diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 846c1104d7..e56b0e1bd8 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -84,9 +84,18 @@ builds/
 # Pass-1 snapshots used by the analysis gate (see .github/prompts/05-analysis-gate.md)
 analysis/daily/*/*/pass1/
 
+# SEO metadata backfill diff reports (see analysis/metadata-backfill/README.md and
+# .github/prompts/seo-metadata-contract.md §6). Intentionally NOT ignored —
+# the dry-run CSV is committed so PRs 3 / 4 / 5 can consume it deterministically
+# and reviewers can inspect tier classification + violation codes in-place.
 # SEO metadata backfill diff reports (see analysis/metadata-backfill/README.md and
 # .github/prompts/seo-metadata-contract.md §6). Intentionally NOT ignored —
 # the dry-run CSV is committed so PRs 3 / 4 / 5 can consume it deterministically
 # and reviewers can inspect tier classification + violation codes in-place.
 !analysis/metadata-backfill/*.csv
 !analysis/metadata-backfill/README.md
+
+# Vendored Mermaid distribution copied from node_modules by
+# scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts during `prebuild`. Reproducible from the
+# pinned `mermaid` devDependency in package.json — do not commit.
+js/lib/mermaid/
diff --git a/Article-Generation.md b/Article-Generation.md
index f45357adce..c0a42bcb9b 100644
--- a/Article-Generation.md
+++ b/Article-Generation.md
@@ -454,18 +454,38 @@ npx tsx scripts/aggregate-analysis.ts --all
 
 ### Cleaning and transformation rules
 
-The aggregator:
+The aggregator (see [`scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts`](scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts) `cleanArtifactBody`):
 
 - Requires `executive-brief.md`.
 - Inserts a `Reader Intelligence Guide` before artifact sections so public readers can find high-value analysis such as media framing and forward indicators without scanning every audit artifact.
 - Strips YAML front matter from each artifact.
 - Removes the first H1 from each artifact and injects its own consistent `## Section Title` heading.
+- **Demotes every internal heading by one level** (`##` → `###`, `###` → `####`, …, capped at H6) before concatenation. Without this, every artifact's own H2s become siblings of the wrapper-injected `## Section Title` and the rendered article ends up with ~170 H2s and a flat outline that violates WCAG 2.4.6 ("Headings and Labels"). Headings inside fenced code blocks are not affected. **Tested by** [`tests/render-lib.test.ts > demoteHeadings`](tests/render-lib.test.ts).
+- **Strips legacy `_Source: file.md_` italic preamble lines** that some artifact templates author at the top of their body. Source attribution now lives in the auto-generated [Reader Intelligence Guide](#-reader-intelligence-guide-deterministic-navigation-layer) and the [`## Article Sources` appendix](#-article-sources-appendix-canonical-source-list) — repeating it under every heading reads like a folder listing, not journalism. Inline prose mentions like *"primary source: data.riksdagen.se/…"* are preserved.
+- **Normalises heading slugs** to drop leading hyphens emitted by `github-slugger` when a heading starts with a stripped character (e.g. emoji like `🎯` in `## 🎯 BLUF` slug to `-bluf` and would otherwise become `id="rm--bluf"` once the `rm-` prefix is applied). Both [`markdown.ts#rehypeSlugWithPrefix`](scripts/render-lib/markdown.ts) and [`aggregator.ts#anchorForTitle`](scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts) collapse leading/trailing hyphens to keep heading IDs and Reader Intelligence Guide anchors in lock-step.
 - Removes leading admin bylines such as `Author`, `Run ID`, `Classification`, `Confidence`, `Prepared by`, `Methodology` and similar metadata fields.
 - Removes trailing `Document control`, `Audit trail`, `Generated by`, template footer and `Pass 2` self-audit sections.
 - Rewrites relative Markdown links to absolute GitHub blob URLs.
 - Keeps Mermaid fences untouched so the renderer can preserve them.
+- Annotates each section heading with an HTML comment of shape `<!-- source: <file> :: <github-blob-url> -->` for offline auditors. The comment is dropped by `rehype-sanitize` so it never reaches rendered HTML.
 - Builds front matter with `title`, `description`, `date`, `subfolder`, `slug`, `source_folder`, `generated_at`, `language` and `layout`.
 
+### 📚 Article Sources appendix (canonical source list)
+
+After every artifact section the aggregator emits a single `## Article Sources` H2 at the very end of the article. Each entry is a markdown list link to the artifact on GitHub:
+
+```markdown
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/.../executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/.../synthesis-summary.md)
+- …
+```
+
+This replaces the legacy per-section `_Source: file.md_` italics. Auditors get one canonical list; readers see clean prose; SEO crawlers see one trustworthy `<ul>` of primary-source links instead of 25+ duplicated italics.
+
 ### Title and description extraction
 
 `article.md` metadata comes from `executive-brief.md`:
@@ -495,14 +515,47 @@ layout: article
 ---
 ```
 
-It then emits deterministic sections such as `## Executive Brief`, `## Synthesis Summary`, `## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments`, `## Significance Scoring`, and so on. Each section includes a source attribution line like:
+It then emits deterministic sections such as `## Executive Brief`, `## Synthesis Summary`, `## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments`, `## Significance Scoring`, and so on. Source attribution is provided by the auto-generated `## Reader Intelligence Guide` (top of article) and `## Article Sources` appendix (bottom of article); the per-section heading carries an HTML comment for offline auditors:
 
 ```markdown
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md)_
+## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md -->
+
+### 🎯 BLUF
+
+…artifact body content, with all internal headings demoted by one level so the outline stays semantically nested…
 ```
 
 The generated first body section is `## Reader Intelligence Guide`, which is intentionally not sourced to a single artifact because it is a deterministic navigation projection of the artifact set.
 
+### ✅ Article minimum-content validator (`scripts/validate-article.ts`)
+
+Every aggregated `analysis/daily/$DATE/$SUBFOLDER/article.md` is checked by [`scripts/validate-article.ts`](scripts/validate-article.ts) — a hard, scripted CI gate that fails the build on any of the following violations:
+
+| Rule code | What it blocks | Why it matters |
+|---|---|---|
+| `unresolved-placeholder` | `[REQUIRED:…]`, `AI_MUST_REPLACE`, `<insert …>`, `TBD:`, `FILL IN` strings surviving Pass-2 | Templates carry these markers on disk; if they reach `article.md` the AI agent skipped a substitution. Article is not publishable. |
+| `missing-reader-guide` | Article missing `## Reader Intelligence Guide` | Aggregator-generated; if missing, the aggregator broke. |
+| `missing-executive-brief` | Article missing `## Executive Brief` H2 | Required artifact malformed. |
+| `missing-bluf` | No `BLUF` heading anywhere | Editorial product cannot ship without a Bottom-Line-Up-Front. |
+| `missing-sources-appendix` | Article missing `## Article Sources` | Aggregator-generated; if missing, re-aggregate. |
+| `bluf-too-short` | BLUF prose < 80 chars | Stub BLUFs (e.g. `TODO`, `pending`) escape Pass-2. A publishable BLUF needs actor + active verb + object + when + so-what. |
+| `bluf-too-long` | BLUF prose > 1200 chars | Runaway dumps belong in Synthesis Summary or Intelligence Assessment, not the 60-second read. |
+| `empty-heading-slug` | Any heading whose permissive slug is empty (e.g. emoji-only) | Empty `#anchor` would break the Reader Intelligence Guide and SERP deep-links. |
+| `per-doc-missing-dok_id` | Any `### HD…`/`### FiU…` per-document subsection lacking at least one dok_id-style code in its body | Every per-document subsection must trace to a primary-source identifier; orphan sections are blocked. |
+
+**Run locally:**
+
+```bash
+# Validate every aggregated article in the repo:
+npm run validate-article
+
+# Validate a single article:
+npx tsx scripts/validate-article.ts analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/article.md
+```
+
+The validator is wired into `npm run validate-all` and runs as a hard CI gate after aggregation. It is **content-only** — structural projections (heading demotion, source-preamble stripping, slug normalisation) are unit-tested in [`tests/render-lib.test.ts`](tests/render-lib.test.ts); this script guards the AI-authored contribution: the artifact contents that the aggregator concatenates.
+
 ---
 
 ## 🌐 How `article.md` Becomes HTML
@@ -659,7 +712,20 @@ The rendering path is:
 2. [`scripts/render-lib/markdown.ts`](scripts/render-lib/markdown.ts) rewrites them to `<pre class="mermaid">` before Markdown parsing.
 3. `rehype-sanitize` allows the `pre.mermaid` class.
 4. [`scripts/render-lib/chrome.ts`](scripts/render-lib/chrome.ts) includes `js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs`.
-5. [`js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs`](js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs) dynamically imports Mermaid `11.4.1` from jsDelivr, initializes a dark theme and renders all Mermaid blocks after page load.
+5. [`js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs`](js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs) dynamically imports Mermaid `11.4.1` from the **same-origin vendored copy under `js/lib/mermaid/`**, initializes a dark theme and renders all Mermaid blocks after page load.
+
+The Mermaid distribution is vendored at build time:
+
+| Step | Location | What it does |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Pin** | [`package.json`](package.json) `devDependencies` | `mermaid` is pinned (currently `11.4.1`) — supply-chain audited like every other dependency, in the npm SBOM. |
+| **Copy** | [`scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts`](scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts) | Run as the first step of `prebuild` (and `predev`). Copies `node_modules/mermaid/dist/mermaid.esm.min.mjs` and its required `chunks/mermaid.esm.min/*.mjs` into `js/lib/mermaid/` (≈2.6 MB, 64 files). Sourcemaps, type declarations, mocks and other ESM variants are excluded. |
+| **Gitignore** | [`.gitignore`](.gitignore) | `js/lib/mermaid/` is intentionally ignored — the directory is reproducible from the pinned dependency, so we don't commit duplicates of `node_modules` content. |
+| **Bundle** | [`.github/workflows/deploy-s3.yml`](.github/workflows/deploy-s3.yml) | The "Copy JS libraries to build output" step merges the full `js/` tree (including `js/lib/mermaid/`) into `dist/js/` after the Vite build, alongside `chart.umd.4.4.1.js`, `d3.7.9.0.min.js`, etc. |
+| **Deploy** | [`scripts/deploy-s3.sh`](scripts/deploy-s3.sh) | `*.mjs` files are uploaded with `Content-Type: application/javascript` and `Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable` — same long-cache treatment as every other vendored asset. |
+| **Guard** | [`tests/no-external-cdn.test.ts`](tests/no-external-cdn.test.ts) | Vitest test that fails CI if any runtime file under `js/` or any rendered article under `news/` references `cdn.jsdelivr.net`, `cdnjs.cloudflare.com`, `unpkg.com`, `esm.sh`, `cdn.skypack.dev`, or `ajax.googleapis.com`. Riksdagsmonitor serves all JavaScript from its own S3/CloudFront origin — no external CDN allowed. |
+
+CSP impact: scripts can be allowed with `script-src 'self'` only — no third-party host needs to be added to the policy. SRI hashes for every Mermaid `.mjs` chunk are produced by `vite-plugin-sri-gen` because the files now live under the build output.
 
 The analysis gate requires color-coded Mermaid through `style` directives or Mermaid `themeVariables` / `%%{init}` blocks.
 
diff --git a/SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md b/SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
index b0dc3fae72..59bd900b31 100644
--- a/SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
+++ b/SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
 Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()
 ```
 
-**Note:** CSP includes `'unsafe-inline'` for Chart.js/D3.js inline styles and large inline dashboard script (946 lines). The `connect-src` directive includes `https://raw.githubusercontent.com` to allow fetching CIA CSV data from the cia repository. Security headers are configured via AWS CloudFront Response Headers Policy for the primary deployment. GitHub Pages disaster recovery inherits default GitHub Pages security headers. Future enhancement: nonce-based CSP for stricter inline script control (roadmap: 2027). Chart.js, D3.js, and chartjs-plugin-annotation are hosted locally on CloudFront (js/lib/) rather than via external CDN, eliminating external script dependencies.
+**Note:** CSP includes `'unsafe-inline'` for Chart.js/D3.js inline styles and large inline dashboard script (946 lines). The `connect-src` directive includes `https://raw.githubusercontent.com` to allow fetching CIA CSV data from the cia repository. Security headers are configured via AWS CloudFront Response Headers Policy for the primary deployment. GitHub Pages disaster recovery inherits default GitHub Pages security headers. Future enhancement: nonce-based CSP for stricter inline script control (roadmap: 2027). Chart.js, D3.js, chartjs-plugin-annotation **and Mermaid** are hosted locally on CloudFront (`js/lib/`) rather than via external CDN, eliminating external script dependencies (CI-enforced by [`tests/no-external-cdn.test.ts`](tests/no-external-cdn.test.ts)).
 
 **Control Mapping:**
 - ISO 27001: A.13.1 Network Security Management
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/article.md
index 5b97e2316e..0525943bd1 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-17
 subfolder: realtime-1434
 slug: 2026-04-17-realtime-1434
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.828Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.625Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
@@ -39,13 +38,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 **Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet advanced two grundlag amendments (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) on 2026-04-17 — the first substantive narrowing of *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* (1766) in the digital-evidence domain in years. Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency.** On the same 24-hour window, FM Maria Malmer Stenergard and PM Ulf Kristersson tabled Sweden's accession to the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine (HD03231) and the International Compensation Commission (HD03232) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg. The cluster reveals a coordinated pre-election legislative sprint across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, housing-market integrity, and quality-of-life deregulation. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | Decision | Evidence Locus | Action Window |
 |----------|---------------|--------------:|
@@ -55,7 +54,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
+### 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
 
 1. **The #1 finding is the KU33 grundlag amendment.** Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan unless *formellt tillförd bevisning*. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the **strategic centre of gravity**. `[HIGH]`
 2. **Ukraine tribunal and compensation commission are co-prominent.** Global news-value high; no direct Swedish fiscal burden; cross-party consensus near-universal (≈ 349 MPs). `[HIGH]`
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
+### 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
 
 | Actor | Role | Why They Matter Now |
 |-------|------|--------------------|
@@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch
+### 🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger | Impact |
 |---------------|---------|--------|
@@ -94,7 +93,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
+### ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md) · [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md) · [SWOT](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md) · [Cross-References](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md) · [Classification](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md)
 
@@ -117,8 +116,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -135,13 +133,13 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 The 24 hours between 2026-04-16 14:00 UTC and 2026-04-17 14:34 UTC produced the **single most consequential democratic-infrastructure development** of the 2025/26 Riksmöte: the **Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)** approved first readings of two **grundlag amendments** — `HD01KU32` (media accessibility under the *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* and *Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen*) and `HD01KU33` (removing "allmän handling" status from digital material seized in husrannsakan). Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes straddling a general election, the 2026 campaign will be shaped by — and will shape — the second reading. KU33 is the **first substantive narrowing of TF transparency in years**, touching a 1766 constitutional text that is older than the United States. Separately, FM **Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)** and PM **Ulf Kristersson (M)** tabled historic Ukraine-accountability propositions `HD03231` (Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression — first since Nuremberg) and `HD03232` (International Compensation Commission), while **Civilutskottet (CU)** advanced the national condominium register (`HD01CU28`) and property-transfer AML rules (`HD01CU27`). The cluster reveals a government executing a coordinated pre-election legislative sprint across four vectors: democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, housing-market integrity, and quality-of-life deregulation. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)
+### 🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)
 
 > **Decision**: Lead article with **Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms** (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33). **Re-weighting rationale**: Raw significance score favours HD03231 (news-value), but **democratic-impact weighting** prioritises grundlag-level changes that are systemic, long-tail, and directly reshape citizens' access rights and press freedom under Sweden's 1766 TF. Ukraine accountability is tabled as **co-prominent secondary coverage** — historically important and globally newsworthy, but institutionally one more step in an already-established Swedish foreign-policy trajectory (Ukraine aid since 2022, NATO March 2024). The KU amendments are the **novel democratic event** of the day.
 
@@ -160,7 +158,7 @@ The 24 hours between 2026-04-16 14:00 UTC and 2026-04-17 14:34 UTC produced the
 
 ---
 
-## 📚 Documents Analysed: 6 (Level-3 depth for KU33; Level-2 for KU32/HD03231/HD03232/CU27/CU28)
+### 📚 Documents Analysed: 6 (Level-3 depth for KU33; Level-2 for KU32/HD03231/HD03232/CU27/CU28)
 
 | Dok ID | Title (short) | Type | Committee | Date | Raw / Weighted | Depth Level |
 |--------|--------------|------|-----------|------|:---:|:-----------:|
@@ -173,7 +171,7 @@ The 24 hours between 2026-04-16 14:00 UTC and 2026-04-17 14:34 UTC produced the
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Cluster Map
+### 🗺️ Cluster Map
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -222,7 +220,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings
+### 🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings
 
 | # | Finding | Evidence (dok_id / source) | Confidence | Democratic Impact |
 |---|---------|---------------------------|:----------:|:-----------------:|
@@ -237,7 +235,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from risk-assessment.md)
+### ⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from risk-assessment.md)
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -258,7 +256,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics
+### 🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics
 
 | Party | KU33 (press freedom) | KU32 (accessibility) | Ukraine Props | Housing (CU) |
 |-------|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|
@@ -275,7 +273,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Forward Indicators (Watch Items with Triggers)
+### 🔮 Forward Indicators (Watch Items with Triggers)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Owner / Source | Target Window |
 |---|-----------|---------|---------------|:-------------:|
@@ -294,7 +292,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter
+### 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -309,7 +307,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Critique
+### 🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Critique
 
 > Before accepting the base narrative, stress-test the assumptions. What if the analyst consensus is wrong?
 
@@ -324,7 +322,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## ❓ Key Uncertainties (What We Cannot Yet Know)
+### ❓ Key Uncertainties (What We Cannot Yet Know)
 
 | # | Uncertainty | Decision Impact | Resolution Window |
 |---|-------------|-----------------|:-----------------:|
@@ -339,7 +337,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🔬 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — KU33 Trajectory
+### 🔬 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — KU33 Trajectory
 
 Testing four hypotheses against the evidence base (adapted from Heuer's ACH methodology):
 
@@ -362,7 +360,7 @@ Testing four hypotheses against the evidence base (adapted from Heuer's ACH meth
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference
+### 🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference
 
 | Combination | Mechanism | Strategic Implication |
 |-------------|-----------|----------------------|
@@ -374,7 +372,7 @@ Testing four hypotheses against the evidence base (adapted from Heuer's ACH meth
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Related Artifacts
+### 📎 Related Artifacts
 
 **Reference-grade dossier files**:
 - [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md) · [Executive Brief](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative International](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md)
@@ -390,8 +388,7 @@ Testing four hypotheses against the evidence base (adapted from Heuer's ACH meth
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.0
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -401,9 +398,9 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 Scoring Method
+### 📐 Scoring Method
 
-### Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 each)
+#### Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 each)
 
 1. **Parliamentary Impact** — committee size, coalition implications, multi-party engagement
 2. **Policy Impact** — scope of policy change, sector reach
@@ -413,7 +410,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; **DIW multiplier** is applied last to reflect democratic-infrastructure durability.
 
-### Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) — v1.0
+#### Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) — v1.0
 
 > **Doctrine**: Raw significance captures news-value. But **democratic-impact weighting** prioritises legislation that shapes the rules under which future politics operates — constitutional amendments, electoral law, grundlag changes, and press-freedom infrastructure. These have **systemic, long-tail effects** that outlast policy cycles. Without DIW, news-value alone can over-weight foreign-policy moments and under-weight constitutional events whose effects compound for decades.
 
@@ -428,7 +425,7 @@ Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; **DIW multiplier** is app
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring
+### 🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring
 
 | Dok ID | Parliamentary | Policy | Public Interest | Urgency | Cross-Party | Raw | DIW | Weighted | Tier | Role |
 |--------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:---:|:---:|:--:|-----|
@@ -441,7 +438,7 @@ Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; **DIW multiplier** is app
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Publication Decision
+### 📊 Publication Decision
 
 | Item | Decision |
 |------|----------|
@@ -455,7 +452,7 @@ Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; **DIW multiplier** is app
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Headline Direction (Enforced Against Weighted Rank)
+### 🎯 Headline Direction (Enforced Against Weighted Rank)
 
 **Primary framing**: *"Sweden's Riksdag Advances Constitutional Press Freedom Reforms"* — reflects the **#1 weighted rank** (HD01KU33).
 
@@ -467,7 +464,7 @@ Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; **DIW multiplier** is app
 
 ---
 
-## 🧮 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Ranking Hold Under Weight Swaps?
+### 🧮 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Ranking Hold Under Weight Swaps?
 
 > How robust is HD01KU33's #1 ranking to plausible variations in the Democratic-Impact Weighting?
 
@@ -481,7 +478,7 @@ Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; **DIW multiplier** is app
 
 **Sensitivity finding** `[HIGH]`: KU33 holds the **#1 position under DIW v1.0 + the two "democratic weighting" variants (3 of 5 scenarios)**. Raw news-value ranking flips to HD03231 (as expected). Foreign-policy bonus (rarely justified) also flips. The DIW v1.0 outcome is **robust to reasonable variation** in democratic-impact weights but **sensitive to whether democratic-impact weighting is applied at all**. This validates the methodology choice but highlights the importance of disciplined application.
 
-### Alternative Rankings — Committee-First View
+#### Alternative Rankings — Committee-First View
 
 If one applies a **committee-first** ranking (heavier weight to constitutional-committee output regardless of document-type), KU33 leads by even wider margin.
 
@@ -494,7 +491,7 @@ If one applies a **committee-first** ranking (heavier weight to constitutional-c
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Publication-Decision Audit
+### 🎯 Publication-Decision Audit
 
 | Decision | Locked At | By | Rationale |
 |----------|:--------:|----|-----------|
@@ -506,7 +503,7 @@ If one applies a **committee-first** ranking (heavier weight to constitutional-c
 
 ---
 
-## 🔍 Anti-Pattern Log
+### 🔍 Anti-Pattern Log
 
 > **Historical failure** (self-documented 2026-04-17 post-review): The original published article **omitted HD03231 and HD03232 entirely**, despite their weighted scores being 8.55 and 7.60. Although the lead-story selection (Constitutional Reforms) was correct under DIW, the failure to include Ukraine accountability as co-prominent coverage represents a **coverage-completeness failure**. The fix is the **Lead-Story Enforcement Gate** added to SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md, which requires articles to cover all documents with weighted score ≥ 7.0.
 
@@ -515,8 +512,7 @@ If one applies a **committee-first** ranking (heavier weight to constitutional-c
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md`
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -528,7 +524,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix (Quantified, 0–10)
+### 📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix (Quantified, 0–10)
 
 | Stakeholder | Power | Interest | KU33 Position (−5 to +5) | Ukraine Props Position | Evidence |
 |-------------|:----:|:-------:|:------------------------:|:----------------------:|----------|
@@ -555,7 +551,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ 1. Citizens & Swedish Public
+### 🏛️ 1. Citizens & Swedish Public
 
 **Position on LEAD (KU33/KU32)**: Low public awareness of grundlag mechanics; amendments typically salient only to attentive publics (~15%) `[MEDIUM]`. Press-freedom framing in 2026 campaign will raise awareness asymmetrically — V/MP electorates mobilise faster than median voter.
 
@@ -567,7 +563,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)
+### 🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)
 
 **Position**: Strongly supportive of all measures — proposing and defending them.
 
@@ -588,7 +584,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)
+### 🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)
 
 **Socialdemokraterna (S)**:
 - **Ukraine**: Strongly supportive — S led Sweden's 2022 Ukraine response under PM Magdalena Andersson `[HIGH]`
@@ -613,7 +609,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏢 4. Business & Industry
+### 🏢 4. Business & Industry
 
 **Real estate sector** (Mäklarsamfundet, FMI): Broadly supportive of CU28 condominium register (reduces market uncertainty and mispricing risk). `[HIGH]`
 
@@ -627,7 +623,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 5. Civil Society
+### 🌐 5. Civil Society
 
 **Press-freedom organisations** (TU, Utgivarna, SJF, Publicistklubben):
 - KU33: **Strongly concerned** — pre-filing remissvar urged; will monitor Lagrådet yttrande closely `[HIGH]`
@@ -646,7 +642,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 6. International Actors
+### 🌍 6. International Actors
 
 | Actor | Ukraine Props Position | KU33 Position | Notes |
 |-------|:----------------------:|:-------------:|-------|
@@ -660,7 +656,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ 7. Judiciary & Constitutional Bodies
+### ⚖️ 7. Judiciary & Constitutional Bodies
 
 - **Lagrådet**: Pending yttrande — the most consequential upcoming stakeholder signal; will scope the interpretive boundary of KU33
 - **KU (Konstitutionsutskottet)**: Self-reviewing; committee record has constitutional weight
@@ -670,7 +666,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 📰 8. Media & Public Opinion
+### 📰 8. Media & Public Opinion
 
 **Swedish mainstream media** (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen, SVT):
 - **KU33**: Extensive editorial engagement expected — press freedom is a live newsroom stake `[HIGH]`
@@ -683,7 +679,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary
+### 🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary
 
 | Package | Coalition Risk | Second-Reading Risk (KU33 only) | Campaign Risk |
 |---------|:-------------:|:-------------------------------:|:-------------:|
@@ -693,7 +689,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Influence-Network Map
+### 🕸️ Influence-Network Map
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -782,7 +778,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🌲 Coalition-Fracture Probability Tree (KU33 Second Reading)
+### 🌲 Coalition-Fracture Probability Tree (KU33 Second Reading)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -821,44 +817,44 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎙️ Named-Actor Briefing Cards
+### 🎙️ Named-Actor Briefing Cards
 
-### Card 1 — Magdalena Andersson (S, former PM, current party leader)
+#### Card 1 — Magdalena Andersson (S, former PM, current party leader)
 - **Position (projected)**: Pragmatic — likely supports constitutional-integrity framing of KU33 if Lagrådet scopes strictly
 - **Leverage**: Decisive for second-reading coalition
 - **Risk to profile**: Left flank mobilising against KU33
 - **Key signal**: First major speech after Lagrådet yttrande
 - **Confidence**: MEDIUM — S-internal dynamics are fluid
 
-### Card 2 — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)
+#### Card 2 — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)
 - **Position**: Owner of investigative-integrity rationale for KU33
 - **Leverage**: Defines how "formellt tillförd bevisning" is prosecutorially applied
 - **Risk to profile**: If interpretation is too narrow → gäng-agenda loses KU33 tool
 - **Key signal**: Guidance to prosecutors post-amendment
 - **Confidence**: HIGH
 
-### Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)
+#### Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)
 - **Position**: Constitutional review body
 - **Leverage**: **Single most consequential upcoming signal** in this run
 - **Risk to profile**: Reputational exposure if yttrande silent on interpretive question
 - **Key signal**: Yttrande text on "formellt tillförd bevisning"
 - **Confidence**: HIGH
 
-### Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V leader)
+#### Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V leader)
 - **Position**: Committed KU33 opposition; press-freedom framing
 - **Leverage**: Amplify attentive-voter mobilisation on press-freedom issue
 - **Risk to profile**: If campaign fails to mobilise beyond 2008 FRA-lagen levels
 - **Key signal**: Campaign launch speech + KU33 salience in polling
 - **Confidence**: HIGH
 
-### Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)
+#### Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)
 - **Position**: Ukraine accountability architect; Nuremberg-framing author
 - **Leverage**: Sweden's foreign-policy capital + norm-entrepreneurship credentials
 - **Risk to profile**: Russian retaliation targeting her personally + diplomatic signalling
 - **Key signal**: Dec 2026 annual foreign-policy speech
 - **Confidence**: HIGH
 
-### Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD leader)
+#### Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD leader)
 - **Position**: Parliamentary-support leverage on all four clusters
 - **Leverage**: 9–10% campaign talking-point reserves
 - **Risk to profile**: European populist-right realignment on Russia
@@ -870,8 +866,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -884,7 +879,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Master Scenario Tree
+### 🧭 Master Scenario Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -937,9 +932,9 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📖 Scenario Narratives
+### 📖 Scenario Narratives
 
-### 🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Proportionate Reform" (P = 0.42)
+#### 🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Proportionate Reform" (P = 0.42)
 
 **Setup**: Lagrådet yttrande calibrates the interpretation; government retains majority; S leadership endorses amendment; second reading passes.
 
@@ -960,7 +955,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🔵 BULL-LITE — "Cross-Party Constitutional Statesmanship" (P = 0.20)
+#### 🔵 BULL-LITE — "Cross-Party Constitutional Statesmanship" (P = 0.20)
 
 **Setup**: S takes leadership, negotiates **stricter interpretive language** into the amendment before second reading. Amendment passes with S+M+KD+L+C joint stamp.
 
@@ -978,7 +973,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading Collapse" (P = 0.15)
+#### 🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading Collapse" (P = 0.15)
 
 **Setup**: Left bloc gains in Sep 2026 election; V+MP+S-left majority blocks KU33 at second reading.
 
@@ -997,7 +992,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift" (P = 0.05)
+#### 🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift" (P = 0.05)
 
 **Setup**: Lagrådet ambivalent; amendment passes; over 5+ years narrow interpretation entrenches in förvaltningsdomstol.
 
@@ -1012,7 +1007,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Crisis" (P = 0.08)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Crisis" (P = 0.08)
 
 **Trigger**: A high-profile case emerges (2026–2028) where investigative journalism was materially blocked by KU33 interpretation.
 
@@ -1027,7 +1022,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "Russian Hybrid Escalation Reshapes Campaign" (P = 0.10)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "Russian Hybrid Escalation Reshapes Campaign" (P = 0.10)
 
 **Trigger**: Major cyber / sabotage / disinformation event attributable to Russia during 2026 campaign — e.g., attack on Swedish government infrastructure, Nordic energy / data cable, or large-scale disinformation op.
 
@@ -1042,7 +1037,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧮 Scenario Probabilities — Rolled Up
+### 🧮 Scenario Probabilities — Rolled Up
 
 | Outcome | Probability |
 |---------|:---------:|
@@ -1056,7 +1051,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Monitoring Indicators (What Flips Priors)
+### 🎯 Monitoring Indicators (What Flips Priors)
 
 | Indicator | Direction | Prior-Update Magnitude |
 |-----------|:---------:|:---------------------:|
@@ -1072,7 +1067,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🛠️ Scenario-Driven Editorial & Policy Implications
+### 🛠️ Scenario-Driven Editorial & Policy Implications
 
 | Scenario | Editorial Framing Implication | Policy Implication |
 |----------|-------------------------------|-------------------|
@@ -1085,7 +1080,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md) §Red-Team Box informs low-probability path consideration
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md) §Bayesian Update Rules drive scenario priors
 - [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md) §TOWS S4×T1 interference explains Mixed pathway
@@ -1096,8 +1091,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24 · **Methodology**: Scenario analysis v1.0
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1109,7 +1103,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape
+### 🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1135,7 +1129,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🗂️ Risk Register
+### 🗂️ Risk Register
 
 | Risk ID | Risk Description | Cluster | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Score | Confidence | Status | Mitigation Owner |
 |:-------:|-----------------|:-------:|:----------------:|:------------:|:-----:|:----------:|:------:|------------------|
@@ -1154,9 +1148,9 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🔴 Priority Risks (Score ≥ 12) — Deep Dive
+### 🔴 Priority Risks (Score ≥ 12) — Deep Dive
 
-### R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score 16, HIGH Confidence)
+#### R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score 16, HIGH Confidence)
 
 **Context**: Russia has conducted hybrid operations against NATO members following Ukraine-support decisions. Sweden's NATO accession (March 2024) combined with founding-member status in the aggression tribunal and reparations commission creates enhanced targeting.
 
@@ -1175,7 +1169,7 @@ quadrantChart
 - MSB cyber-incident bulletins
 - Nordic infrastructure events (cables, power, logistics)
 
-### R2 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation Entrenchment (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)
+#### R2 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation Entrenchment (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)
 
 **Context**: HD01KU33 preserves "allmän handling" status for seized digital material **only** when it is *formellt tillförd bevisning*. The interpretive boundary of "formally incorporated" is **legislatively underspecified** in the public summary. A future government (or shift in prosecutorial practice) could apply a narrow test, functionally shielding large volumes of seized material from offentlighetsprincipen.
 
@@ -1192,7 +1186,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 **Bayesian update trigger**: If Lagrådet yttrande is silent on the interpretive test, update likelihood 3 → 4 (score to 16).
 
-### R3 — Tribunal Effectiveness Without US (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)
+#### R3 — Tribunal Effectiveness Without US (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)
 
 **Context**: The International Criminal Court illustrates the effectiveness cost of US non-participation. Public US statements on HD03231 have been cautious. The tribunal can still operate as a legitimacy platform and set precedent, but enforcement against high-value defendants becomes dependent on arrest-state cooperation.
 
@@ -1202,7 +1196,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 **Mitigation**: EU coalition-building; Council of Europe framework provides legitimacy backstop; G7 asset-policy coordination.
 
-### R5 — KU33 Campaign Weaponisation (Score 12, HIGH Confidence)
+#### R5 — KU33 Campaign Weaponisation (Score 12, HIGH Confidence)
 
 **Context**: V/MP have strong press-freedom commitments and will foreground KU33 in the 2026 campaign. S's leadership has signalled mixed positions — if the S leadership moves against KU33, the second-reading coalition fractures.
 
@@ -1215,7 +1209,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day
+### 📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'themeVariables': {'xyChart': {'plotColorPalette': '#D32F2F'}}}}%%
@@ -1233,7 +1227,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Bayesian Update Rules
+### 🔄 Bayesian Update Rules
 
 | Observable Signal | Direction | Risk Affected | Magnitude |
 |-------------------|:---------:|:-------------:|:---------:|
@@ -1247,7 +1241,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🧮 Bayesian Prior / Posterior Illustration — Risk R2 (KU33 Narrow Interpretation)
+### 🧮 Bayesian Prior / Posterior Illustration — Risk R2 (KU33 Narrow Interpretation)
 
 | Step | State | Likelihood Source | Score |
 |------|-------|-------------------|:-----:|
@@ -1261,7 +1255,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph
+### 🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1307,7 +1301,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)
+### 🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)
 
 | Risk Tier | Score Band | ALARP Status | Action Requirement |
 |-----------|:----------:|:-----------:|--------------------|
@@ -1316,7 +1310,7 @@ graph LR
 | **Medium (yellow)** | 7–11 | 🟡 ALARP — monitor | Owner assigned; quarterly review |
 | **Low (green)** | 1–6 | ✅ Accept | Monitor through standard bulletins |
 
-### Applied to this run
+#### Applied to this run
 
 | Risk | Score | Tier | Treatment Status |
 |------|:----:|:----:|-----------------|
@@ -1334,7 +1328,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)
+### 🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)
 
 | Risk | Current Trajectory | Expected Velocity (next 90 days) | Trigger |
 |------|:-----:|:-----:|---------|
@@ -1350,8 +1344,7 @@ graph LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md`
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1366,11 +1359,11 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Section 1 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (PRIMARY SCOPE)
+### 🏛️ Section 1 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (PRIMARY SCOPE)
 
 Scope: HD01KU32 (media accessibility amendment to TF + YGL) and HD01KU33 (removal of "allmän handling" status from digital material seized at husrannsakan). First reading only; second reading required post-2026 election for entry into force (proposed 2027-01-01).
 
-### ✅ Strengths — Government & Constitutional Framework Position
+#### ✅ Strengths — Government & Constitutional Framework Position
 
 | # | Strength Statement | Evidence (dok_id / source) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-------------------|----------------------------|:----------:|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -1380,7 +1373,7 @@ Scope: HD01KU32 (media accessibility amendment to TF + YGL) and HD01KU33 (remova
 | S4 | Narrow carve-out design — "allmän handling" status retained when material is formally incorporated as evidence — provides **textual safeguard** | HD01KU33 text | **HIGH** | **MEDIUM** | 2026-04-17 |
 | S5 | Disability-rights framing (KU32) unifies M/KD/L/C/MP/L and neutralises opposition | KU32 committee support pattern | **HIGH** | LOW | 2026-04-17 |
 
-### ⚠️ Weaknesses — Democratic-Infrastructure Risks
+#### ⚠️ Weaknesses — Democratic-Infrastructure Risks
 
 | # | Weakness Statement | Evidence | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-------------------|----------|:----------:|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -1390,7 +1383,7 @@ Scope: HD01KU32 (media accessibility amendment to TF + YGL) and HD01KU33 (remova
 | W4 | Timing places constitutional press-freedom debate **inside 2026 campaign** — politicising grundlag in a way previous amendments were shielded from | 8 kap. 14 § RF two-reading rule; election cycle | **HIGH** | **MEDIUM** | 2026-04-17 |
 | W5 | Lagrådet review still pending at publication — constitutional craftsmanship not yet independently vetted | Lagrådet process | **HIGH** | LOW | 2026-04-17 |
 
-### 🚀 Opportunities — Democratic Upside
+#### 🚀 Opportunities — Democratic Upside
 
 | # | Opportunity Statement | Evidence | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|----------------------|----------|:----------:|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -1399,7 +1392,7 @@ Scope: HD01KU32 (media accessibility amendment to TF + YGL) and HD01KU33 (remova
 | O3 | Strengthened investigative integrity (KU33) → improved **organised-crime prosecution** outcomes; feeds government's gäng-agenda policy coherence | Gäng-agenda policy framework | **MEDIUM** | **MEDIUM** | 2026-04-17 |
 | O4 | Second-reading moment after election = **democratic stress-test** — new Riksdag's democratic bona fides judged by how it handles KU33 | 8 kap. RF | **MEDIUM** | **MEDIUM** | 2026-04-17 |
 
-### 🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside
+#### 🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside
 
 | # | Threat Statement | Evidence | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|------------------|----------|:----------:|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -1411,7 +1404,7 @@ Scope: HD01KU32 (media accessibility amendment to TF + YGL) and HD01KU33 (remova
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 SWOT Quadrant Mapping — Constitutional Reforms (Color-Coded)
+### 📊 SWOT Quadrant Mapping — Constitutional Reforms (Color-Coded)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1472,7 +1465,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔀 TOWS Interference Matrix — Constitutional Cluster
+### 🔀 TOWS Interference Matrix — Constitutional Cluster
 
 | Interaction | Mechanism | Strategic Implication | Confidence |
 |-------------|-----------|----------------------|:----------:|
@@ -1485,7 +1478,7 @@ graph TD
 
 > **Cross-SWOT interference finding** `[HIGH]`: The **strategic centre of gravity** of the constitutional package is the interpretation of "*formellt tillförd bevisning*" (S4 / W2). If Lagrådet and Riksdag's legislative history lock in a strict interpretation, KU33 functions as a narrow, proportionate reform and T1/T3/T4 largely dissipate. If the language is left loose, T1+T4 combine into a durable democratic-infrastructure threat. **Recommendation**: press-freedom NGOs and opposition parties should make a **strict interpretive record** the price of second-reading support.
 
-### 🔗 Cross-Cluster Tension — Constitutional × Ukraine
+#### 🔗 Cross-Cluster Tension — Constitutional × Ukraine
 
 | Tension | Description | Strategic Implication |
 |---------|-------------|----------------------|
@@ -1493,9 +1486,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 Section 2 — Ukraine Accountability Package (SECONDARY SCOPE)
+### 🌍 Section 2 — Ukraine Accountability Package (SECONDARY SCOPE)
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|-----------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1504,7 +1497,7 @@ graph TD
 | S3 | **No direct Swedish fiscal burden** for reparations — funded from Russian immobilised assets (~EUR 260B; EUR 191B at Euroclear) | HD03232; G7 Ukraine Loan | HIGH | HIGH |
 | S4 | Sweden's post-NATO (March 2024) norm-entrepreneurship credentials reinforced | HD03231; NATO accession context | HIGH | MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|-----------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1512,14 +1505,14 @@ graph TD
 | W2 | Reparations timeline may span decades (Iraq UNCC: 31 years, $52B) | UNCC historical record | HIGH | MEDIUM |
 | W3 | Sitting-HoS immunity gap in international law | Rome Statute 2017 amendment limits | MEDIUM | MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|-----------|----------|:---:|:---:|
 | O1 | Closes Nuremberg gap in modern international criminal law | First aggression tribunal since 1945-46 | HIGH | HIGH |
 | O2 | Reconstruction-governance voice (USD 486B+ damages per World Bank 2024) | HD03232; World Bank RDNA | HIGH | MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|-----------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1529,7 +1522,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🏠 Section 3 — Housing Reforms (TERTIARY SCOPE)
+### 🏠 Section 3 — Housing Reforms (TERTIARY SCOPE)
 
 | Dimension | HD01CU28 (Register) | HD01CU27 (Identity + Ombildning) | Confidence |
 |-----------|---------------------|----------------------------------|:----------:|
@@ -1543,8 +1536,7 @@ graph TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md`
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1556,7 +1548,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🌳 Attack-Tree — Democratic-Infrastructure Threats (KU33 Focus)
+### 🌳 Attack-Tree — Democratic-Infrastructure Threats (KU33 Focus)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1597,7 +1589,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Threat Register
+### 🎭 Threat Register
 
 | Threat ID | Threat | Cluster | Actor | Method / TTP | Likelihood | Impact | Priority | Confidence |
 |:---------:|--------|:-------:|-------|--------------|:----------:|:------:|:--------:|:----------:|
@@ -1614,7 +1606,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political Adaptation)
+### 🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political Adaptation)
 
 | STRIDE | Threat ID(s) | Political Translation |
 |:------:|:------------:|-----------------------|
@@ -1627,31 +1619,31 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔥 Priority-Mitigation Actions
+### 🔥 Priority-Mitigation Actions
 
-### T1 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation (MITIGATE PRIORITY)
+#### T1 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation (MITIGATE PRIORITY)
 - **Pre-vote**: Lagrådet yttrande must explicitly scope "formellt tillförd bevisning" test
 - **Pre-vote**: KU committee record should document legislator intent (strict interpretation)
 - **Post-vote**: JO/JK annual reporting on KU33 application; NGO monitoring framework
 
-### T2 — Campaign Weaponisation (MITIGATE)
+#### T2 — Campaign Weaponisation (MITIGATE)
 - Cross-party leadership statements on KU33 (avoid partisan capture)
 - Early NGO engagement (SJF, Utgivarna, TU) to co-design interpretive guardrails
 - Government transparency commitment: annual published summary of KU33 applications
 
-### T6 — Russian Hybrid (MITIGATE PRIORITY)
+#### T6 — Russian Hybrid (MITIGATE PRIORITY)
 - SÄPO reinforced posture during valrörelse
 - NCSC continuous monitoring of gov infrastructure
 - NATO CCDCOE and StratCom COE coordination
 - MSB public-awareness campaign on information-operation tactics
 
-### T3 / T10 — Slippery-Slope + Index Downgrade (ACTIVE)
+#### T3 / T10 — Slippery-Slope + Index Downgrade (ACTIVE)
 - UD press-freedom diplomacy pre-brief RSF/Freedom House on amendment scope
 - Constitutional scholars' commentary positioned for international audiences
 
 ---
 
-## 🧪 Threat Severity Matrix
+### 🧪 Threat Severity Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1676,7 +1668,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Cyber-Kill-Chain Adaptation — Hybrid-Warfare Scenario (T6)
+### 🎯 Cyber-Kill-Chain Adaptation — Hybrid-Warfare Scenario (T6)
 
 > Adapting the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain (Hutchins et al. 2011) to Russian hybrid-warfare targeting of Sweden after HD03231 founding-member status.
 
@@ -1701,7 +1693,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style AC fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### Kill-Chain Specific Indicators (for SÄPO / MSB)
+#### Kill-Chain Specific Indicators (for SÄPO / MSB)
 
 | Stage | Observable | Sensor | Detection Confidence |
 |-------|------------|--------|:-------------------:|
@@ -1717,7 +1709,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🔺 Diamond Model — Adversary Profile (T6 Russian Hybrid)
+### 🔺 Diamond Model — Adversary Profile (T6 Russian Hybrid)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1742,7 +1734,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧰 MITRE-Style TTP Library (Hybrid-Warfare Observables)
+### 🧰 MITRE-Style TTP Library (Hybrid-Warfare Observables)
 
 | TTP Code | Tactic | Technique | Observable in Sweden (2023–25 baseline) |
 |----------|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------|
@@ -1765,7 +1757,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ Defensive Recommendations (Prioritised)
+### 🛡️ Defensive Recommendations (Prioritised)
 
 | # | Recommendation | Owner | Horizon |
 |---|---------------|-------|:-------:|
@@ -1784,8 +1776,7 @@ graph TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01CU27\-CU28
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1799,7 +1790,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksd
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Political Significance — A Coherent Housing-Market Integrity + Organised-Crime Architecture
+### 1. Political Significance — A Coherent Housing-Market Integrity + Organised-Crime Architecture
 
 These two betänkanden are **individually tertiary** in this run's DIW ranking but **collectively important** because they institutionalise a **housing-market-integrity + anti-money-laundering** architecture that:
 
@@ -1812,9 +1803,9 @@ These two betänkanden are **individually tertiary** in this run's DIW ranking b
 
 ---
 
-## 2. HD01CU28 — National Condominium Register
+### 2. HD01CU28 — National Condominium Register
 
-### 2.1 Mechanism
+#### 2.1 Mechanism
 
 - Creates a **new national register of all bostadsrätter** (cooperative apartments/condominiums)
 - Register contains:
@@ -1826,7 +1817,7 @@ These two betänkanden are **individually tertiary** in this run's DIW ranking b
 - **Operator**: Lantmäteriet
 - **Effective dates**: Register setup **Jan 1 2027**; other operational provisions per government decision
 
-### 2.2 Context and Scale `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.2 Context and Scale `[HIGH]`
 - ≈ **2 million bostadsrätter** — one of Sweden's most common housing forms
 - Absence of unified register has been repeatedly criticised since 2010s:
   - Credit-market opacity → mispricing risk
@@ -1835,7 +1826,7 @@ These two betänkanden are **individually tertiary** in this run's DIW ranking b
 - Financial sector (SEB, Swedbank, Handelsbanken, SBAB, Nordea) has lobbied for register since mid-2010s
 - SOU-ledda utredning underpinning this reform: estimate SOU 2023/24 (precise reference pending public availability)
 
-### 2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
+#### 2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
 
 | Lens | Finding | Conf. |
 |------|--------|:-----:|
@@ -1848,9 +1839,9 @@ These two betänkanden are **individually tertiary** in this run's DIW ranking b
 
 ---
 
-## 3. HD01CU27 — Identity Requirements + Ombildning Reform
+### 3. HD01CU27 — Identity Requirements + Ombildning Reform
 
-### 3.1 Mechanism — Two Reforms in One Betänkande
+#### 3.1 Mechanism — Two Reforms in One Betänkande
 
 **Reform 1 — Identity Requirements for Lagfart (Property Title Transfer)**:
 - **Physical persons**: Must supply **personnummer** or **samordningsnummer** when applying for lagfart
@@ -1863,14 +1854,14 @@ These two betänkanden are **individually tertiary** in this run's DIW ranking b
 - **New rule**: Tenant must have been **folkbokförd at the address for ≥ 6 months** to count in the 2/3 calculation
 - **Anti-fraud rationale**: Closes the "ghost-tenant" loophole where landlords registered cooperative actors at short-notice to manufacture conversion majorities
 
-### 3.2 Context `[HIGH]`
+#### 3.2 Context `[HIGH]`
 - Ombildning remains politically sensitive — particularly in Stockholm (2010s wave), Göteborg, Malmö
 - Hyresgästföreningen has long documented loophole exploitation
 - Financial press (Dagens industri, SvD Näringsliv) has covered multiple egregious cases
 - Skatteverket Hewlett + SÄPO: property has been a vector for organised-crime laundering — Bitcoin-era enforcement gap
 - EU AMLD6 (6th Anti-Money-Laundering Directive) compliance trajectory
 
-### 3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
+#### 3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
 
 | Lens | Finding | Conf. |
 |------|--------|:-----:|
@@ -1883,7 +1874,7 @@ These two betänkanden are **individually tertiary** in this run's DIW ranking b
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)
+### 4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1940,7 +1931,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Beneficiary Analysis
+### 5. Beneficiary Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
@@ -1953,7 +1944,7 @@ pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors
+### 6. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors
 
 | Stakeholder | CU27 | CU28 | Evidence | Conf. |
 |-------------|:----:|:----:|----------|:-----:|
@@ -1977,7 +1968,7 @@ pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Evidence Table
+### 7. Evidence Table
 
 | # | Claim | Source | Conf. | Impact |
 |---|-------|--------|:-----:|:------:|
@@ -1994,7 +1985,7 @@ pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Indicator Library (What to Watch)
+### 8. Indicator Library (What to Watch)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Decision-Maker | Target |
 |---|-----------|---------|----------------|:------:|
@@ -2008,7 +1999,7 @@ pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Implementation Risk Assessment
+### 9. Implementation Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk | L | I | Score | Mitigation Owner |
 |------|:-:|:-:|:-----:|------------------|
@@ -2021,7 +2012,7 @@ pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Cross-References
+### 10. Cross-References
 
 - **Policy lineage**: Gäng-agenda (Prop 2025/26:100) · HD03246 (juvenile-crime, covered in realtime-0029 earlier today) · EU AMLD6
 - **Fiscal context**: Spring budget 2026 (HD0399)
@@ -2033,8 +2024,7 @@ pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
 **Classification**: Public · **Depth**: L2 Strategic · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ### HD01KU32\-KU33
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2048,7 +2038,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksd
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Political Significance — Why These Are the Lead Story
+### 1. Political Significance — Why These Are the Lead Story
 
 Sweden's **Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF)** is the world's **oldest freedom-of-the-press law** (1766 — ten years before the United States Declaration of Independence, two decades before the U.S. First Amendment, and 83 years before France's 1849 press law). It is a **grundlag** — one of four constitutional laws of the realm. The **Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL, 1991)** extends equivalent protections to modern broadcast and digital media.
 
@@ -2056,7 +2046,7 @@ Sweden's **Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF)** is the world's **oldest freedom-of-t
 
 This mechanism is a deliberate constitutional brake: it forces every grundlag amendment to survive a democratic mandate change. The **2026 election campaign will therefore be partly a referendum on KU32 and KU33.**
 
-### HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility (EU EAA grundlag accommodation)
+#### HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility (EU EAA grundlag accommodation)
 
 - **Mechanism**: Amends TF and YGL to permit tillgänglighetskrav (accessibility requirements) to be imposed via **ordinary law** on products/services that fall within the grundlag-protected sphere.
 - **Three operative elements**:
@@ -2066,7 +2056,7 @@ This mechanism is a deliberate constitutional brake: it forces every grundlag am
 - **EU driver**: **European Accessibility Act (Directive 2019/882)** — full application since June 2025
 - **Beneficiary scale**: ~1.5 million Swedes with disabilities (Myndigheten för delaktighet baseline)
 
-### HD01KU33 — Search/Seizure Digital Evidence (TF transparency narrowing)
+#### HD01KU33 — Search/Seizure Digital Evidence (TF transparency narrowing)
 
 - **Mechanism**: Amends TF so that **digital recordings seized, copied, or taken over during husrannsakan** (criminal search) are **no longer "allmän handling"** — i.e., fall outside offentlighetsprincipen.
 - **Exception**: If seized material is **formally incorporated as evidence** (*formellt tillförd bevisning*) in the investigation, it **retains "allmän handling"** status.
@@ -2075,7 +2065,7 @@ This mechanism is a deliberate constitutional brake: it forces every grundlag am
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermaid)
+### 2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermaid)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -2101,7 +2091,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)
+### 3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)
 
 | Dimension | HD01KU32 (Accessibility) | HD01KU33 (Search/Seizure) | Conf. |
 |-----------|--------------------------|---------------------------|:-----:|
@@ -2112,7 +2102,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 4. "Formellt tillförd bevisning" — The Critical Interpretive Frontier
+### 4. "Formellt tillförd bevisning" — The Critical Interpretive Frontier
 
 The **single most important question** in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions will interpret *"formellt tillförd bevisning"* ("formally incorporated as evidence"). Three interpretive postures are plausible:
 
@@ -2126,7 +2116,7 @@ The **single most important question** in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Stakeholder Perspectives (Named Actors)
+### 5. Stakeholder Perspectives (Named Actors)
 
 | Stakeholder | HD01KU32 | HD01KU33 | Evidence |
 |-------------|:--------:|:--------:|----------|
@@ -2145,7 +2135,7 @@ The **single most important question** in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Evidence Table (with Confidence Labels)
+### 6. Evidence Table (with Confidence Labels)
 
 | # | Claim | Source | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|-------|--------|:----------:|:------:|
@@ -2161,7 +2151,7 @@ The **single most important question** in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Forward Indicators (With Triggers and Dates)
+### 7. Forward Indicators (With Triggers and Dates)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Decision-Maker | Target |
 |---|-----------|---------|----------------|:------:|
@@ -2176,7 +2166,7 @@ The **single most important question** in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Cross-References
+### 8. Cross-References
 
 - **Grundlag text**: [Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF, 1766)](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/tryckfrihetsforordning-19491105_sfs-1949-105) · [Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL, 1991)](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/yttrandefrihetsgrundlag-19911469_sfs-1991-1469) · 8 kap. 14 § [Regeringsformen](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/kungorelse-1974152-om-beslutad-ny-regeringsform_sfs-1974-152)
 - **EU driver**: Directive 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act)
@@ -2186,7 +2176,7 @@ The **single most important question** in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions
 
 ---
 
-## 9. International Comparison — Digital-Evidence Transparency Regimes
+### 9. International Comparison — Digital-Evidence Transparency Regimes
 
 | Country | Regime | RSF 2025 | Parallel to KU33? |
 |---------|--------|:--:|------------------|
@@ -2207,7 +2197,7 @@ The **single most important question** in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branching Tree
+### 10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branching Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -2235,8 +2225,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Analysis Level**: L3 (Intelligence) · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ### HD03231
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03231-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2253,11 +2242,11 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Political Significance — Why This Is a Generational Norm-Entrepreneurship Moment
+### 1. Political Significance — Why This Is a Generational Norm-Entrepreneurship Moment
 
 Sweden formally proposes to become a **founding member** of the **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine** — the **first criminal tribunal established since the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals (1945–1948) to prosecute the crime of aggression specifically**. The tribunal will sit in **The Hague**, operate under the **Council of Europe framework** via an Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA), and have jurisdiction to prosecute the Russian political and military leadership responsible for the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
 
-### Key developments since invasion
+#### Key developments since invasion
 
 | Date | Event | Significance |
 |------|-------|-------------|
@@ -2270,7 +2259,7 @@ Sweden formally proposes to become a **founding member** of the **Special Tribun
 | **Q2–Q3 2026 (projected)** | Swedish kammarvote on both propositions | Constitutional authorisation |
 | **H2 2026 or later** | Tribunal operations commence; first docket opens | Accountability delivery |
 
-### Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's verbatim statement
+#### Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's verbatim statement
 
 > *"Ryssland måste ställas till svars för sitt aggressionsbrott mot Ukraina. Annars riskerar vi en värld där anfallskrig lönar sig. Sverige tar nu nästa steg för att ansluta sig till en särskild tribunal för att åtala och döma ryska politiska och militära ledare för aggressionsbrottet, något som inte skett sedan Nürnbergrättegångarna."*
 
@@ -2278,39 +2267,39 @@ Sweden formally proposes to become a **founding member** of the **Special Tribun
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework
+### 2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework
 
-### 2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens `[HIGH]`
 - Ratification requires Riksdag approval under RF 10 kap. (treaty accession)
 - EPA structure means Sweden contributes assessed dues under Council of Europe framework — no novel domestic-law needed
 - Tribunal jurisdiction covers **crime of aggression** as defined in ICC Rome Statute Art. 8 *bis* (2017 Kampala amendments) — filling the gap where ICC's aggression jurisdiction excludes UNSC permanent-member nationals in most circumstances
 - **Sitting-HoS immunity** remains a frontier legal question — the SCSL precedent (Charles Taylor) and Rome Statute Art. 27 support piercing, but ICJ *Arrest Warrant* (2002, DRC v Belgium) established general HoS immunity under customary international law
 
-### 2.2 Electoral / Political Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.2 Electoral / Political Lens `[HIGH]`
 - **Coalition position (M/KD/L + SD parliamentary support)**: Strongly supportive
 - **Opposition (S/V/MP)**: S and MP strongly supportive; V historically sceptical of NATO framing but consistently pro-accountability since 2022
 - **SD calculus**: Nuremberg framing neutralises SD's prior ambivalence on international-institution deepening; Russia-hostility overlaps with SD voter base
 - **Centre (C)**: Strongly supportive (European international-law tradition)
 - **Projected cross-party consensus**: ≈ **349 MPs** — near-universal
 
-### 2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens `[HIGH]`
 - Sweden's **post-NATO (Mar 2024) norm-entrepreneurship credentials** reinforced — this is the first major multilateral-law commitment since accession
 - Complements the ICC: ICC covers war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide; Special Tribunal fills the **aggression-crime gap** unprosecutable under current ICC rules (Kampala limitations)
 - Message to non-European aggressors (PRC strategic observers): aggression now has a dedicated accountability track even when UNSC is deadlocked
 - Signals to Russia: **no reset pathway** — Swedish commitment is institutional, not policy-cyclical
 
-### 2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens `[HIGH]`
 - Direct precedent: **Nuremberg IMT (1945–46)** — 12 death sentences, 3 life sentences, 4 acquittals
 - Closer structural model: **Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL, 2002–13)** — hybrid Council-of-Europe / state-accession design; convicted sitting-era HoS (Charles Taylor)
 - Parallel structural model: **Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL, 2009–23)** — Council-of-Europe-adjacent framework
 - The tribunal represents a **major evolution in international criminal law since the Rome Statute (1998)** — institutionalising aggression-crime accountability outside UNSC veto politics
 
-### 2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens `[MEDIUM]`
+#### 2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens `[MEDIUM]`
 - Sweden's **direct fiscal contribution**: EPA assessed dues (estimate: SEK 30–80 M annually based on Council-of-Europe EPA patterns) — modest
 - **Indirect fiscal exposure**: Zero — reparations architecture (HD03232) funded from Russian immobilised assets, not Swedish treasury
 - **Asymmetric cost-benefit**: Low direct cost, high signalling value; enhanced reconstruction-contract positioning for Swedish firms (Saab, Volvo, Assa Abloy, Ericsson)
 
-### 2.6 Risk / Threat Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.6 Risk / Threat Lens `[HIGH]`
 - **Diplomatic**: Russia has condemned all accountability mechanisms; additional rhetorical/diplomatic hostility expected
 - **Hybrid-warfare**: See `threat-analysis.md` T6 — MEDIUM-HIGH likelihood, HIGH impact
 - **Legal**: Tribunal effectiveness dependent on non-member cooperation (US, China, Russia not expected to join)
@@ -2319,7 +2308,7 @@ Sweden formally proposes to become a **founding member** of the **Special Tribun
 
 ---
 
-## 3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)
+### 3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -2374,7 +2363,7 @@ graph TD
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### TOWS Interference Highlights
+#### TOWS Interference Highlights
 
 | Interaction | Mechanism | Strategic Implication | Conf. |
 |-------------|-----------|----------------------|:-----:|
@@ -2385,7 +2374,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors
+### 4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors
 
 | Stakeholder | Position | Evidence / Rationale | Conf. |
 |-------------|:--:|---------------------|:-----:|
@@ -2412,7 +2401,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Evidence Table
+### 5. Evidence Table
 
 | # | Claim | Source | Conf. | Impact |
 |---|-------|--------|:-----:|:------:|
@@ -2429,7 +2418,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptation
+### 6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptation
 
 | STRIDE | Applies to HD03231? | Evidence / Translation |
 |--------|:------------------:|-----------------------|
@@ -2442,7 +2431,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)
+### 7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Decision-Maker | Target Window |
 |---|-----------|---------|----------------|:-------------:|
@@ -2457,7 +2446,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Forward Scenarios (Short + Medium Horizon)
+### 8. Forward Scenarios (Short + Medium Horizon)
 
 | Scenario | P | Indicator | Consequence |
 |----------|:-:|-----------|-------------|
@@ -2468,7 +2457,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Cross-References
+### 9. Cross-References
 
 - **Companion**: [`HD03232-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md) — International Compensation Commission
 - **Precedents**: Nuremberg IMT (1945–46); SCSL (Sierra Leone, 2002–13); STL (Lebanon, 2009–23)
@@ -2482,8 +2471,7 @@ graph TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Depth**: L2+ Strategic · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ### HD03232
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03232-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03232-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2500,11 +2488,11 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03232-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Political Significance — Reparations Architecture for the Largest Inter-State Compensation Claim Since WWII
+### 1. Political Significance — Reparations Architecture for the Largest Inter-State Compensation Claim Since WWII
 
 Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an **International Compensation Commission for Ukraine** (the "Hague Compensation Commission" / ICCU). The commission is the institutional mechanism through which **Russia can be held financially liable for the full-scale damages caused by its illegal invasion**. It is the **companion instrument** to HD03231 (Special Tribunal) — together they constitute the Ukraine accountability architecture: **criminal accountability of individuals** (tribunal) + **financial accountability of the state** (commission).
 
-### Origins and foundation
+#### Origins and foundation
 
 | Date | Event | Significance |
 |------|-------|-------------|
@@ -2517,7 +2505,7 @@ Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an **International Comp
 | **Apr 16 2026** | Sweden tables HD03232 | **This document** |
 | **H2 2026 – H1 2027** | Projected commission operational start | Claims-adjudication phase |
 
-### Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's statement
+#### Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's statement
 
 > *"Genom skadeståndskommissionen kan Ryssland hållas ansvarigt för de skador som dess folkrättsvidriga handlingar har orsakat. Det ukrainska folket måste få upprättelse."*
 
@@ -2525,9 +2513,9 @@ Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an **International Comp
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework
+### 2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework
 
-### 2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens `[HIGH]`
 - Riksdag approval required for treaty accession (RF 10 kap.)
 - ICCU is a **treaty-based international organisation** with claims-registration → adjudication → awards → enforcement pipeline
 - **Critical legal question**: enforcement mechanism. Options:
@@ -2536,14 +2524,14 @@ Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an **International Comp
   3. **Post-settlement negotiation**: Part of future peace-settlement package
 - Sweden's accession locks in Swedish **voice in enforcement-mechanism selection**
 
-### 2.2 Electoral / Political Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.2 Electoral / Political Lens `[HIGH]`
 - **Consensus issue**: Same near-universal support as HD03231 (≈349 MPs projected)
 - **Populist-positive framing**: "Russia pays, not Swedish taxpayers" — aligns with SD, C, M, KD messaging
 - **Progressive framing**: UN-backed mechanism, international law, victim restoration — aligns with S, V, MP, C messaging
 - **Rare cross-ideological policy**: Both left and right can champion without compromise
 - Expected Riksdag vote: late spring / early summer 2026
 
-### 2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens `[HIGH]`
 - Reparations mechanism designed to **complement** the tribunal (criminal accountability) with **structural financial accountability**
 - **Immobilised Russian sovereign assets (≈ EUR 260B)**: The primary source contemplated. Distribution:
   - **EUR 191B** at Euroclear (Belgium) — the largest single concentration
@@ -2552,7 +2540,7 @@ Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an **International Comp
 - G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025) uses **profits** from immobilised assets — this is the first institutional use; HD03232 potentially extends to principal use
 - Sweden's membership strengthens its voice in how the mechanism handles asset-use decisions — particularly **EU-internal cleavage** between asset-seizure hawks (Poland, Baltic states, Finland) and state-immunity cautious (Germany, France, Belgium)
 
-### 2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens `[HIGH]`
 - **Most direct precedent: UN Compensation Commission (UNCC) for Iraq/Kuwait, 1991–2022**
   - Paid out ≈ USD 52.4B over **31 years**
   - Funded from 5–30% of Iraqi oil-export revenues (UNSC Res 687/705/1956)
@@ -2562,14 +2550,14 @@ Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an **International Comp
 - **Iran–US Claims Tribunal (1981–)**: Algiers Accords model; still active after 40+ years
 - Ukraine damages (USD 486B+ World Bank 2024) are ≈ 10× the Iraq–Kuwait figure — **unprecedented scale**
 
-### 2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens `[HIGH]`
 - **Sweden's own contribution to ICCU**: Administrative costs only (modest — SEK 10–40M annually estimate based on analogous UN/CoE administrative commissions)
 - **Reparations fund source**: Russian state (immobilised assets + future Russian obligations) — **not Swedish taxpayers**
 - **Total damages (World Bank RDNA3, 2024)**: USD 486B+; continues to rise
 - **Swedish indirect upside**: Reconstruction-contract positioning for Swedish firms (Skanska, NCC, Peab, ABB Sweden, Ericsson, Volvo Construction Equipment) — early-accession status strengthens lobbying position
 - **Fiscal risk**: Zero direct exposure; indirect exposure only if Sweden later contributes to bridging financing (political choice)
 
-### 2.6 Risk / Threat Lens `[HIGH]`
+#### 2.6 Risk / Threat Lens `[HIGH]`
 - **Legal**: Russia will refuse participation; enforcement depends on asset-repurposing coalition sustainability
 - **Diplomatic**: Russian retaliation parallel to HD03231
 - **Political (in Sweden)**: Very low (consensus)
@@ -2579,7 +2567,7 @@ Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an **International Comp
 
 ---
 
-## 3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)
+### 3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -2634,7 +2622,7 @@ graph TD
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### TOWS Interference Highlights
+#### TOWS Interference Highlights
 
 | Interaction | Mechanism | Strategic Implication | Conf. |
 |-------------|-----------|----------------------|:-----:|
@@ -2645,7 +2633,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors
+### 4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors
 
 | Stakeholder | Position | Evidence / Rationale | Conf. |
 |-------------|:--:|---------------------|:-----:|
@@ -2672,7 +2660,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Evidence Table
+### 5. Evidence Table
 
 | # | Claim | Source | Conf. | Impact |
 |---|-------|--------|:-----:|:------:|
@@ -2689,7 +2677,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Bayesian Path Analysis (Conditional Scenarios)
+### 6. Bayesian Path Analysis (Conditional Scenarios)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -2715,7 +2703,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)
+### 7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Decision-Maker | Target Window |
 |---|-----------|---------|----------------|:-------------:|
@@ -2730,7 +2718,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Scenario Snapshot
+### 8. Scenario Snapshot
 
 | Scenario | P | Key Trigger | Consequence |
 |----------|:-:|-------------|-------------|
@@ -2741,7 +2729,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Cross-References
+### 9. Cross-References
 
 - **Companion**: [`HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md) — Special Tribunal for Aggression
 - **Precedents**: UNCC (Iraq–Kuwait, 1991–2022, USD 52.4B over 31 years); Iran–US Claims Tribunal (1981–); Post-WWII German reparations tracks
@@ -2755,8 +2743,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Depth**: L2+ Strategic · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2767,11 +2754,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 1 — Digital-Evidence Transparency: How Other Democracies Balance Investigative Integrity vs Press Freedom
+### 🧭 Section 1 — Digital-Evidence Transparency: How Other Democracies Balance Investigative Integrity vs Press Freedom
 
 > Context: KU33 narrows "allmän handling" status for digital material seized at husrannsakan unless *formellt tillförd bevisning*. How do comparable constitutional democracies reconcile press-freedom doctrine with investigative-integrity concerns over seized digital evidence?
 
-### Comparative Framework
+#### Comparative Framework
 
 | Jurisdiction | Constitutional Anchor | Digital-Evidence Transparency Rule | Press-Freedom Rank (RSF 2025) | Swedish Parallel |
 |-------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------|:--:|------------------|
@@ -2793,7 +2780,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 > 2. The 1766 grundlag history (no Nordic neighbour amends a 260-year-old constitutional text)
 > 3. Slippery-slope precedent for further TF compression
 
-### Nordic Transparency Models — Most-Similar Design
+#### Nordic Transparency Models — Most-Similar Design
 
 | Country | Transparency Law | Digital-Evidence Treatment | Key Protection |
 |---------|------------------|---------------------------|----------------|
@@ -2807,11 +2794,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 2 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Similar Tribunals Have Fared
+### 🧭 Section 2 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Similar Tribunals Have Fared
 
 > Context: HD03231 (Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression) and HD03232 (International Compensation Commission). Historical and comparative benchmarks for assessing likely trajectory.
 
-### Historical Aggression-Tribunal Benchmarks
+#### Historical Aggression-Tribunal Benchmarks
 
 | Tribunal | Era | Structure | Outcome | Relevance to HD03231 |
 |----------|------|-----------|---------|----------------------|
@@ -2823,7 +2810,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | **ICC (Rome Statute)** | 2002– | Treaty-based | 124 states parties; aggression jurisdiction limited (Kampala amendments) | Complementary to HD03231 |
 | **STL** (Lebanon/Hariri) | 2009–23 | UN + Lebanon, Council of Europe-support model | Limited convictions | Structural model for HD03231 |
 
-### HD03231 Distinctive Features
+#### HD03231 Distinctive Features
 
 | Dimension | HD03231 (Ukraine) | Closest Precedent | Assessment |
 |-----------|------------------|-------------------|-----------|
@@ -2834,7 +2821,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | Enforcement mechanism | State-cooperation; parallel asset-immobilisation | ICC | Limited without US participation |
 | Expected caseload | Highest-level Russian officials | IMT scope | Precedent-scale |
 
-### International Compensation Commission Precedents
+#### International Compensation Commission Precedents
 
 | Commission | Era | Mandate | Outcome | Relevance to HD03232 |
 |------------|-----|---------|---------|----------------------|
@@ -2849,7 +2836,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 3 — Press-Freedom Indices — Sweden's Position and Risk
+### 🧭 Section 3 — Press-Freedom Indices — Sweden's Position and Risk
 
 | Index | 2025 Rank | Methodology Sensitivity to KU33 | Projected Direction Post-Amendment |
 |-------|:--:|--------------------------------|------------------------------------|
@@ -2858,7 +2845,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | **V-Dem Civil Liberties** | 0.96 | LOW — absorbs within broader civil-liberties score | Minor `[LOW]` |
 | **Freedom on the Net** | 93/100 | MEDIUM — digital-freedom focus relevant to KU33 | ↓ 1–3 points `[MEDIUM]` |
 
-### Historical Sweden Index Movement (Context)
+#### Historical Sweden Index Movement (Context)
 
 | Year | RSF Rank | Notable Factor |
 |------|:--:|---------------|
@@ -2872,7 +2859,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 4 — EU Accessibility Act Precedent (KU32 Context)
+### 🧭 Section 4 — EU Accessibility Act Precedent (KU32 Context)
 
 | Country | EAA Implementation Approach | Grundlag / Constitutional Adjustment? | Lessons for Sweden |
 |---------|-------------------------------|:-------------------------------------:|--------------------|
@@ -2887,7 +2874,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 5 — Opposition-Exploitation Patterns in Comparable Democracies
+### 🧭 Section 5 — Opposition-Exploitation Patterns in Comparable Democracies
 
 | Jurisdiction | Analogous Case | Opposition Framing | Electoral Impact |
 |-------------|----------------|---------------------|:----:|
@@ -2901,7 +2888,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 6 — Diplomatic Response Patterns to Aggression-Tribunal Founders
+### 🧭 Section 6 — Diplomatic Response Patterns to Aggression-Tribunal Founders
 
 | Founder-State | Year | Russian / Adversary Response | Magnitude |
 |--------------|:--:|------------------------------|:--:|
@@ -2916,7 +2903,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Sources
+### 📎 Sources
 
 - Reporters Without Borders, *World Press Freedom Index 2025*
 - Freedom House, *Freedom in the World 2025* / *Freedom on the Net 2025*
@@ -2931,7 +2918,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md) scenarios Base/Bull-Lite use Nordic-model analogy
 - [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md) T6 Russian hybrid-warfare calibrated against Finland / Estonia / Lithuania precedents
@@ -2943,8 +2930,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24 · **Methodology**: Comparative-politics analysis v1.0
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2954,7 +2940,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🗂️ Document Classification (with Data Depth)
+### 🗂️ Document Classification (with Data Depth)
 
 | Dok ID | Policy Area | Priority | Type | Committee | Sensitivity | Scope | Urgency | Grundlag? | Data Depth |
 |--------|-------------|:-------:|:----:|:---------:|:----------:|:-----:|:-------:|:---------:|:----------:|
@@ -2965,7 +2951,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD01CU28 | Housing Policy / Financial Markets / AML | P2 — Important | Betänkande | CU | Public | Sector | 2027 | No | **L2 Strategic** |
 | HD01CU27 | Property Law / AML / Organised Crime | P2 — Important | Betänkande | CU | Public | Sector | H2 2026 | No | **L2 Strategic** |
 
-### Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid)
+#### Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -2988,7 +2974,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping
+### 🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping
 
 | Domain | Documents | Weighted Weight |
 |--------|-----------|:---------------:|
@@ -3000,7 +2986,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🇪🇺 EU, Council of Europe & International Linkages
+### 🇪🇺 EU, Council of Europe & International Linkages
 
 | Document | International Linkage | Treaty / Instrument | Urgency |
 |----------|-----------------------|---------------------|:-------:|
@@ -3012,7 +2998,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Publication Implications
+### 🎯 Publication Implications
 
 | Classification Signal | Article Impact |
 |----------------------|----------------|
@@ -3023,7 +3009,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied
+### 🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied
 
 | Document | Priority | Depth Tier | Per-Doc File |
 |----------|:-------:|:----------:|--------------|
@@ -3041,7 +3027,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Retention & Review Cadence
+### 📅 Retention & Review Cadence
 
 | Artefact | Retention | Review Cadence | Trigger Events |
 |----------|-----------|:--------------:|----------------|
@@ -3053,7 +3039,7 @@ flowchart TD
 | `methodology-reflection.md` | Permanent | One-off reference artefact | Methodology change |
 | `documents/*-analysis.md` | Permanent | On kammarvote; post-implementation | Voting + operational milestones |
 
-### Trigger Events Requiring Re-Analysis
+#### Trigger Events Requiring Re-Analysis
 
 | Trigger | Owner | Files to Re-Review |
 |---------|-------|--------------------|
@@ -3065,7 +3051,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔐 Access-Control Impact
+### 🔐 Access-Control Impact
 
 Classification **Public** means:
 - All files publishable on `github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor`
@@ -3088,8 +3074,7 @@ Classification **Restricted** (none) would apply to:
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3098,7 +3083,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Document Linkage Graph (Constitutional Lead + Ukraine Context)
+### 🕸️ Document Linkage Graph (Constitutional Lead + Ukraine Context)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -3185,22 +3170,22 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧱 Thematic Clusters
+### 🧱 Thematic Clusters
 
-### Cluster A — Constitutional Reform (LEAD)
+#### Cluster A — Constitutional Reform (LEAD)
 - **HD01KU33 + HD01KU32** (this run, first reading)
 - Constitutional mechanics: TF (1766), YGL (1991), RF 8 kap. 14 §
 - EU driver: Accessibility Act (EAA 2019/882)
 - **Second reading required post-Sep-2026 election** — structurally embeds KU33/KU32 in 2026 valrörelse
 - Institutional review: Lagrådet yttrande pending
 
-### Cluster B — Ukraine Accountability
+#### Cluster B — Ukraine Accountability
 - **HD03231 + HD03232** (this run, propositions)
 - Institutional pillars: Council of Europe, Nuremberg precedent, ICC gap, Hague Convention Dec 2025
 - Financial architecture: G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025), Euroclear EUR 191B, Russian assets ~EUR 260B
 - Security context: NATO accession (March 2024)
 
-### Cluster C — Property / AML
+#### Cluster C — Property / AML
 - **HD01CU28 + HD01CU27** (this run)
 - Policy lineage: gäng-agenda (Prop 2025/26:100), juvenile-crime proposition (HD03246)
 - EU context: AMLD6
@@ -3208,7 +3193,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## ⏱️ Contextual Timeline — Nuremberg → Rome → Hague → Stockholm → 2027
+### ⏱️ Contextual Timeline — Nuremberg → Rome → Hague → Stockholm → 2027
 
 ```mermaid
 timeline
@@ -3233,7 +3218,7 @@ timeline
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Cross-Cluster Interference (Rhetorical)
+### 🔗 Cross-Cluster Interference (Rhetorical)
 
 | Tension | Description | Opposition Exploit Vector |
 |---------|-------------|---------------------------|
@@ -3242,7 +3227,7 @@ timeline
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table
+### 🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table
 
 Continuity with adjacent Riksdagsmonitor runs — so subsequent analysts can find antecedents and the causal chain:
 
@@ -3255,7 +3240,7 @@ Continuity with adjacent Riksdagsmonitor runs — so subsequent analysts can fin
 | HD01CU28 (Apr 17) | SOU 2023/24 on bostadsrätt register | Implementation: register setup Jan 1 2027 |
 | HD01CU27 (Apr 17) | Hyresgästföreningen loophole documentation (2015–24) | Entry into force Jul 1 2026 |
 
-### Continuity Contracts (How Future Runs Inherit from This One)
+#### Continuity Contracts (How Future Runs Inherit from This One)
 
 | Commitment | Where | Inherited Claim |
 |-----------|-------|-----------------|
@@ -3270,8 +3255,7 @@ Continuity with adjacent Riksdagsmonitor runs — so subsequent analysts can fin
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3284,75 +3268,75 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## ✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)
+### ✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)
 
-### 1. DIW-Weighted Lead-Story Selection
+#### 1. DIW-Weighted Lead-Story Selection
 
 The Democratic-Impact Weighting methodology correctly elevated the grundlag package over raw news-value rank. Before DIW v1.0, the lede would have been Ukraine (raw 9). With DIW, the lead is KU33 (weighted 9.8). This is the correct democratic-infrastructure call.
 
 **Codify as**: Mandatory DIW table in every `significance-scoring.md` (see Rule 5 in `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`). `[HIGH]`
 
-### 2. Coverage-Completeness Rule (Weighted ≥ 7.0)
+#### 2. Coverage-Completeness Rule (Weighted ≥ 7.0)
 
 The rule prevents silent omission of co-prominent stories. Ukraine propositions (weighted 8.55 + 7.60) must appear as dedicated H3 sections even when lead is elsewhere.
 
 **Codify as**: Bash enforcement gate in `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` "Lead-Story & Coverage-Completeness Gate". `[HIGH]`
 
-### 3. Confidence Labels on Every Analytical Claim
+#### 3. Confidence Labels on Every Analytical Claim
 
 Every claim in synthesis-summary, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder files carries `[HIGH]` / `[MEDIUM]` / `[LOW]`. This forces the analyst to distinguish observed fact from projection.
 
 **Codify as**: Template checklist item — any analytical sentence without a confidence label is flagged as template-filler in QA. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 4. Color-Coded Mermaid With Real Data
+#### 4. Color-Coded Mermaid With Real Data
 
 Every file has ≥ 1 Mermaid diagram with colour directives and real dok_ids / actor names. Zero placeholder diagrams.
 
 **Codify as**: Template preamble block with Mermaid colour palette (already in `political-style-guide.md`). `[HIGH]`
 
-### 5. TOWS Interference Matrix
+#### 5. TOWS Interference Matrix
 
 The S4 × T1 cross-SWOT interference finding (that the interpretation of "formellt tillförd bevisning" is the strategic centre of gravity) is the **single most actionable insight** in the dossier. It emerged from TOWS, not vanilla SWOT.
 
 **Codify as**: Mandatory TOWS matrix in every `swot-analysis.md` when the run has ≥ 4 entries in any SWOT quadrant. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 6. Cross-Cluster Rhetorical Tension
+#### 6. Cross-Cluster Rhetorical Tension
 
 The "press freedom abroad vs at home" tension was identified, named, and analysed for exploitation vectors. Opposition parties will use this; the government will need a counter-narrative.
 
 **Codify as**: When a run covers ≥ 2 thematic clusters, the synthesis-summary MUST include a §Cross-Cluster Interference subsection. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 7. Attack-Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE
+#### 7. Attack-Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE
 
 The threat-analysis file applies four complementary threat frameworks, each surfacing different dimensions (goal-decomposition, adversary-lifecycle, actor-infrastructure-capability-victim, and STRIDE classification). No single framework would have produced the full threat picture.
 
 **Codify as**: Threat-analysis template §3 (Frameworks) becomes a multi-framework checklist. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 8. Bayesian Update Rules
+#### 8. Bayesian Update Rules
 
 The risk-assessment file specifies **observable signals** (Lagrådet yttrande, S-leader statement, Nordic cable event) that trigger explicit prior/posterior risk-score updates. This makes the analysis **living** rather than static.
 
 **Codify as**: Every risk-assessment file MUST include a Bayesian-update-rules table. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 9. International Comparative Benchmarking
+#### 9. International Comparative Benchmarking
 
 The comparative file situated Swedish reforms against DE, UK, US, FR, Nordic, and EU benchmarks, revealing that Nordic neighbours operate **exactly the regime KU33 proposes** — a finding that directly refutes the strongest version of the "press-freedom regression" framing while preserving the interpretive-frontier concern.
 
 **Codify as**: Runs with P0 or P1 documents MUST include a `comparative-international.md` file. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 10. Scenario Analysis With Probabilities
+#### 10. Scenario Analysis With Probabilities
 
 Base / Bull-Lite / Bear / Mixed / Wildcard-1 / Wildcard-2 scenarios with explicit prior probabilities that sum to 1.0. Monitoring indicators flip priors. The analysis becomes **actionable** for editorial and policy decisions.
 
 **Codify as**: Runs with multiple scenarios should produce a `scenario-analysis.md`; mandatory for P0. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 11. Executive Brief (One-Pager)
+#### 11. Executive Brief (One-Pager)
 
 The `executive-brief.md` compresses the dossier into a 3-minute read for newsroom editors / policy advisors who will not read the full 11-file set.
 
 **Codify as**: Every run MUST produce an `executive-brief.md`. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 12. README / Reading Order
+#### 12. README / Reading Order
 
 Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executive / policy / intelligence / tracker / methodologist), and copy-paste-safe top-line findings. Onboarding time reduced from 30 min to 5 min.
 
@@ -3360,9 +3344,9 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 ---
 
-## ❌ What Failed First-Pass (Documented Anti-Patterns)
+### ❌ What Failed First-Pass (Documented Anti-Patterns)
 
-### AP-A: Silent Omission of Weighted ≥ 7 Documents
+#### AP-A: Silent Omission of Weighted ≥ 7 Documents
 
 **Failure**: First-draft English and Swedish articles **entirely omitted HD03231 and HD03232** despite their weighted scores being 8.55 and 7.60. The author prioritised grundlag lead but silently dropped Ukraine.
 
@@ -3372,7 +3356,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 **Lesson codified**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` Rule 5 Anti-pattern A. `[HIGH]`
 
-### AP-B: News-Value vs Democratic-Impact Confusion
+#### AP-B: News-Value vs Democratic-Impact Confusion
 
 **Failure**: Raw significance score (9 for HD03231) would have led the article — correct for news-value but wrong for democratic-infrastructure impact.
 
@@ -3382,7 +3366,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 **Lesson codified**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` Rule 5 + `significance-scoring.md` mandatory DIW section. `[HIGH]`
 
-### AP-C: Shallow Per-Doc Files for Secondary Clusters
+#### AP-C: Shallow Per-Doc Files for Secondary Clusters
 
 **Failure**: Initial per-doc files for HD03231, HD03232, CU27/CU28 were thin L1 (≈ 70–130 lines) without confidence labels, Mermaid diagrams, forward indicators, or stakeholder named actors — inconsistent with LEAD KU32/33 file (L3, 153 lines with full tradecraft).
 
@@ -3390,7 +3374,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 **Lesson codified**: Template update — `per-file-political-intelligence.md` gains an L1/L2/L3 depth-tier checklist; any document classified P0/P1 must be L2+ minimum. `[HIGH]`
 
-### AP-D: Stale Data Manifest
+#### AP-D: Stale Data Manifest
 
 **Failure**: `data-download-manifest.md` retained obsolete "HD03231 ✅ LEAD / HD01KU32 ✅ Secondary" labels after DIW re-ranking.
 
@@ -3398,7 +3382,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 **Lesson codified**: Template update — data manifest fields use "Selected? (post-DIW)" heading. Automated check: if significance-scoring.md disagrees with data-download-manifest.md on lead-story, block commit. `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### AP-E: Missing Self-Audit Loop
+#### AP-E: Missing Self-Audit Loop
 
 **Failure**: Prior runs had no mechanism to capture lessons-learned and feed them upstream into the methodology guide and templates. Failures kept recurring.
 
@@ -3408,9 +3392,9 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 ---
 
-## 🔧 Recommended Upstream Changes
+### 🔧 Recommended Upstream Changes
 
-### A. `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` — Additions
+#### A. `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` — Additions
 
 1. **§Rule 5 (DIW)**: Already in place — keep, cite realtime-1434 as exemplar
 2. **§Rule 6 — Reference-Grade Depth Tiers**: New rule specifying L1/L2/L3 content floors per document priority:
@@ -3422,7 +3406,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 4. **§Rule 8 — International-Comparative Benchmarking**: P0/P1 runs include `comparative-international.md`
 5. **§Exemplar pointer**: Cite realtime-1434 as canonical reference
 
-### B. Templates — New or Extended
+#### B. Templates — New or Extended
 
 | Template | Status | Action |
 |---------|:------:|--------|
@@ -3440,14 +3424,14 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 | `political-classification.md` | EXTEND | Sensitivity decision tree + data-depth levels |
 | `per-file-political-intelligence.md` | EXTEND | L1/L2/L3 depth tiers with content floor per tier |
 
-### C. Agentic Workflow Changes
+#### C. Agentic Workflow Changes
 
 1. `news-realtime-monitor.md` Step D.2: enforce Lead-Story & Coverage-Completeness Gate (already deployed)
 2. `news-realtime-monitor.md` Step D.3: (new) enforce reference-grade minimum file-set for P0 runs — exec-brief, scenarios, comparative, reflection, README
 3. `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md`: Add new §"Reference-Grade File Set" verifying presence of required files per priority tier
 4. All 12 agentic workflows: replicate the gate pattern consistently
 
-### D. Skills Updates
+#### D. Skills Updates
 
 - `.github/skills/intelligence-analysis-techniques/SKILL.md`: Add ACH, Red-Team, Kill Chain, Diamond, Bayesian, scenario-tree references with pointer to realtime-1434 as exemplar
 - `.github/skills/editorial-standards/SKILL.md`: Already has Gate 0 (Lead-Story) — extend with reference-grade depth-tier guidance
@@ -3456,7 +3440,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs Achieved)
+### 📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs Achieved)
 
 | Metric | Target | Achieved | Gap |
 |--------|:------:|:--------:|:---:|
@@ -3475,7 +3459,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Recommendation to Methodology Owner (CEO)
+### 🎯 Recommendation to Methodology Owner (CEO)
 
 1. **Designate realtime-1434 as Riksdagsmonitor's reference exemplar** for political-intelligence tradecraft. All future runs measure against it.
 2. **Merge this reflection's Section C upstream changes** into `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 and template set.
@@ -3488,8 +3472,7 @@ Directory `README.md` provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executiv
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24 · **Exemplar Lock-In**: 2026-09-01 (CEO sign-off required)
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3502,7 +3485,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🔌 Data Sources
+### 🔌 Data Sources
 
 | Source | MCP Tool | Status | Count |
 |--------|----------|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -3518,7 +3501,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📄 Key Documents Retrieved (Post-DIW Selection)
+### 📄 Key Documents Retrieved (Post-DIW Selection)
 
 | Dok ID | Type | Date | Raw | DIW | Weighted | Role | Depth |
 |--------|:----:|:----:|:---:|:---:|:--------:|------|:-----:|
@@ -3533,7 +3516,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🚫 Excluded Documents (Previously Covered)
+### 🚫 Excluded Documents (Previously Covered)
 
 | Dok ID | Reason |
 |--------|--------|
@@ -3544,7 +3527,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🕐 Data Freshness
+### 🕐 Data Freshness
 
 - **Last riksdagen sync**: 2026-04-17T14:34:37Z (live)
 - **Data age at analysis start**: < 1 minute
@@ -3553,7 +3536,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Provenance & Chain-of-Custody
+### 🔗 Provenance & Chain-of-Custody
 
 | Step | Tool / Responsible | Timestamp (UTC) |
 |------|-------------------|:---------------:|
@@ -3568,3 +3551,25 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 ---
 
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-24
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03232-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/article.md
index d9b8f87716..6d27bf1efd 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-18
 subfolder: realtime-1705
 slug: 2026-04-18-realtime-1705
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.833Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.630Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
@@ -39,13 +38,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 **On 2026-04-13 – 16, the Kristersson government tabled a coordinated four-document pre-election sprint: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100, DIW 9.5) sets the macro frame, an extra supplementary budget (HD03236, DIW 8.5) delivers fuel-tax cuts and electricity/gas subsidies to cost-of-living voters, Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer's youth-offender law (HD03246, DIW 7.5) toughens rules for 15–17 year-olds, and the SfU committee's migration-inhibition order (HD01SfU22, DIW 6.5) replaces temporary residence permits for deportation-blocked individuals.** The package lands against a fragile macro backdrop — GDP growth just 0.82 % (2024) after −0.20 % (2023), unemployment at 8.7 % (≈ 450,000 people, 2025), inflation tamed to 2.84 % (2024 vs 8.55 % 2023). The most acute operational risk is the SiS youth-detention capacity crisis (already 100 %+ utilisation); the most acute legal risk is ECHR Article 3/5 exposure on HD01SfU22; the most acute fiscal-credibility risk is three mini-budgets in two months drawing Riksrevisionen commentary. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | Decision | Evidence Locus | Action Window |
 |----------|---------------|--------------:|
@@ -55,7 +54,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
+### 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
 
 1. **HD03100 is the #1 story** — Svantesson's vårproposition is the macro umbrella under which HD0399 (amendment budget) and HD03236 (extra budget) are being justified. Unemployment 8.7 % is the government's main attack surface. `[HIGH]`
 2. **HD03236 (fuel + energy relief) is the electoral centrepiece** — ~5.2 million car owners, all ~4.9 million household electricity customers benefit. S/V/MP cannot oppose on distributional grounds without electoral cost. `[HIGH]`
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
+### 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
 
 | Actor | Role | Why They Matter Now |
 |-------|------|--------------------|
@@ -86,7 +85,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch
+### 🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger | Impact |
 |---------------|---------|--------|
@@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
+### ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md) · [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md) · [SWOT](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md) · [Cross-References](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md) · [Classification](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md)
 
@@ -124,31 +123,30 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Coverage:** April 13-18, 2026 | **Documents analyzed:** 4 primary
 
-## Key Findings
+### Key Findings
 
 This monitoring cycle captures a dense legislative period in the final weeks before Sweden's 2026 summer recess, featuring an unusually large cluster of government propositions submitted on April 13-16. The dominant theme is **fiscal expansion meeting crime policy escalation** — the Kristersson government has deployed four simultaneous fiscal instruments (spring proposition, amendment budget, extra budget, tax accounts) alongside two justice reforms, signaling an election-oriented policy sprint.
 
-### Top-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 9.5): Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)
+#### Top-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 9.5): Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)
 Sweden's 2026 Vårproposition establishes a fiscal framework in a context of fragile recovery: GDP grew just 0.82% in 2024 after -0.20% in 2023, while unemployment remains at 8.7% (2025). Inflation has been tamed (2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023) but the jobs recovery lags. The proposition frames all other fiscal decisions in this cycle.
 
-### Second-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 8.5): Extra Supplementary Budget — Energy/Fuel Relief (HD03236)
+#### Second-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 8.5): Extra Supplementary Budget — Energy/Fuel Relief (HD03236)
 An extraordinary supplementary budget combining fuel tax cuts with electricity and gas price subsidies represents a significant fiscal intervention. This politically motivated measure — coming weeks before the September 2026 Riksdag election campaign — benefits rural/suburban voters with high car dependency. Estimated cost: reduces state fuel excise revenue; offset partially by EU energy support instruments.
 
-### Third-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 7.5): Stricter Youth Crime Law (HD03246)
+#### Third-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 7.5): Stricter Youth Crime Law (HD03246)
 Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer's proposition to tighten rules for young offenders (ages 15-17) advances the Tidö coalition's core crime agenda. With Sweden's youth gang violence continuing to attract international attention, this measure carries high political salience despite thin evidence of deterrent efficacy.
 
-### Fourth-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 6.5): Migration Inhibition Order System (HD01SfU22)
+#### Fourth-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 6.5): Migration Inhibition Order System (HD01SfU22)
 SfU committee approval of replacing temporary residence permits with inhibition orders for deportation-blocked individuals fundamentally tightens Sweden's migration system. Effective June 2026, this affects an estimated 2,000-4,000 individuals annually and carries significant ECHR litigation risk.
 
-## Cross-Cutting Theme: Election Posturing
+### Cross-Cutting Theme: Election Posturing
 All four major documents advance pre-election positioning: energy subsidies for cost-of-living voters, stricter crime laws for security voters, tighter migration for SD base voters. The spring proposition provides the macro cover for this spending.
 
-## Documents Analyzed
+### Documents Analyzed
 | dok_id | Title | Type | DIW Score |
 |--------|-------|------|-----------|
 | HD03100 | Vårproposition 2026 | prop | 9.5 |
@@ -157,12 +155,11 @@ All four major documents advance pre-election positioning: energy subsidies for
 | HD01SfU22 | Inhibition av verkställigheten | bet | 6.5 |
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Methodology:** DIW (Democratic Impact Weighting)
 
-## Scoring Matrix
+### Scoring Matrix
 
 | dok_id | Title | Party Breadth | Fiscal | Defense | Crime/Social | Named Minister | Committee | DIW Score | Tier |
 |--------|-------|--------------|--------|---------|-------------|----------------|-----------|-----------|------|
@@ -176,34 +173,33 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | HD03242 | Aktivt skogsbruk | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Kullgren | MJU | **5.0** | 🟡 MEDIUM |
 | HD01MJU19 | Avfallslagstiftning reform | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | MJU | **4.5** | 🟡 MEDIUM |
 
-## Lead Story Determination
+### Lead Story Determination
 **#1 DIW-ranked: HD03100 (9.5)** — The Spring Economic Proposition 2026 is the year's defining fiscal document. Article title, meta description, and H1 MUST reference this document first.
 
-## Composite Coverage Decision
+### Composite Coverage Decision
 Generate breaking news article covering:
 1. **PRIMARY**: Spring budget package (HD03100 + HD03236 + HD0399) as unified fiscal story
 2. **SECONDARY**: Youth crime law (HD03246) as social policy layer
 3. **CONTEXT**: Migration inhibition (HD01SfU22) as legislative package supporting evidence
 
-## Article Type: BREAKING (HIGH severity, multi-document cluster)
+### Article Type: BREAKING (HIGH severity, multi-document cluster)
 **Severity Score**: 7+ on all top documents → GENERATE ARTICLE
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Date:** 2026-04-18
 
-## The 8 Mandatory Stakeholder Groups
+### The 8 Mandatory Stakeholder Groups
 
-### 1. Citizens / Swedish Households
+#### 1. Citizens / Swedish Households
 **Impact**: DIRECT AND SIGNIFICANT
 - **Energy/fuel subsidies (HD03236)**: ~5.2 million car owners benefit from lower pump prices; all households benefit from lower electricity/gas costs. Average Swedish household spends ~SEK 28,000/year on energy (2025 estimate).
 - **Unemployment concern (HD03100)**: 8.7% unemployment (2025) = approx. 450,000 Swedes actively seeking work. Spring proposition's labor market chapter critical.
 - **Youth crime (HD03246)**: Parents of young children welcome tougher deterrents; civil liberties advocates express concern.
 - **Migration (HD01SfU22)**: Majority supportive of stricter returns enforcement (SVT/Ipsos polls consistently show ~55-60% backing tough migration measures).
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)
+#### 2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)
 **Position**: STRONGLY SUPPORTIVE across all four measures
 - **M**: Owns economic narrative (inflation tamed), crime reform, energy competitiveness
 - **KD**: Values-based support for youth crime reform (family protection), energy affordability
@@ -212,7 +208,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 **Coalition tension indicator**: NONE significant. All four documents advance coalition priorities simultaneously.
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)
 **Position**: SPLIT by document, unified in critique framing
 
 - **S (Socialdemokraterna)**: 
@@ -232,7 +228,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
   - Demands fuel tax increase, not cut, to fund public transport
   - Youth crime: rehabilitation-first, punishment-last
 
-### 4. Business & Industry
+#### 4. Business & Industry
 **Position**: BROADLY POSITIVE
 - **Logistics sector**: Fuel tax cuts directly reduce operating costs for Sweden's 30,000+ trucking companies
 - **Energy-intensive industry**: Electricity support extends competitive advantage in European market
@@ -240,7 +236,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 - **Tech sector**: Public administration interoperability (HD03244) opens government data market
 - **Forestry/agriculture**: Active forestry regulation (HD03242) provides long-term planning certainty
 
-### 5. Civil Society & NGOs
+#### 5. Civil Society & NGOs
 **Position**: DIVIDED
 - **Rescue (Swedish Red Cross, Civil Rights Defenders)**: Strongly oppose HD01SfU22 — ECHR compliance concerns
 - **Amnesty Sweden**: Opposes both migration inhibition and mandatory reporting requirements
@@ -248,7 +244,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 - **Environmental organizations (Naturskyddsföreningen)**: Oppose fuel tax cuts (HD03236) as climate regressive
 - **Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO)**: Support energy subsidies for lower-income workers; concerned about unemployment
 
-### 6. International & EU Context
+#### 6. International & EU Context
 **Position**: MONITORING WITH CONCERN on migration
 - **EU Commission**: Monitoring HD01SfU22 compatibility with EU returns directive
 - **UNHCR**: Expected statement opposing inhibition order system replacing residence permits
@@ -256,14 +252,14 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 - **Nordic neighbors**: Watching Sweden's migration model as template vs. own more liberal frameworks
 - **European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg)**: Potential future caseload from HD01SfU22 applications
 
-### 7. Judiciary & Constitutional Bodies
+#### 7. Judiciary & Constitutional Bodies
 **Position**: ANALYTICAL/CAUTIONARY
 - **Lagrådet (Law Council)**: Will review HD01SfU22 and HD03246 for constitutional/ECHR compliance
 - **Riksrevisionen**: Has already flagged fiscal framework concerns (HD03241); multiple supplementary budgets will attract scrutiny
 - **Migrationsdomstolarna (Migration Courts)**: Operational burden increase from inhibition order appeals
 - **SiS (youth institutions)**: Warning signs about capacity; HD03246 increases their mandate without resources
 
-### 8. Media & Public Opinion
+#### 8. Media & Public Opinion
 **Position**: HIGH ATTENTION, MIXED FRAMING
 - **Mainstream media (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen)**: Cover spring budget as top story; crime reform as Page 2
 - **Energy/fuel cuts**: Strong positive consumer framing in tabloids; criticism in quality press environmental pages
@@ -271,8 +267,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 - **International media**: Sweden's crime wave coverage (NYT, Guardian) provides backdrop for HD03246 coverage
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -285,7 +280,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Master Scenario Tree
+### 🧭 Master Scenario Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -359,9 +354,9 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📖 Scenario Narratives
+### 📖 Scenario Narratives
 
-### 🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly Delivers" (P = 0.38)
+#### 🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly Delivers" (P = 0.38)
 
 **Setup**: Riksrevisionen signals moderate concern but no adverse finding; Lagrådet yttrande flags rights issues on HD03246 (capacity) and HD01SfU22 (judicial review) but does not recommend withdrawal; SiS enters overflow via private contracts; coalition retains majority.
 
@@ -379,7 +374,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🔵 BULL — "Recovery Story Takes Hold" (P = 0.18)
+#### 🔵 BULL — "Recovery Story Takes Hold" (P = 0.18)
 
 **Setup**: Inflation normalisation accelerates; Riksbank delivers two 25bp cuts in Q2–Q3 2026; unemployment falls below 8.0 % by Q3; US tariff environment moderates; coalition retains majority with an enlarged mandate.
 
@@ -397,7 +392,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🟠 MIXED — "S-led Minority, Package Re-scoped" (P = 0.22)
+#### 🟠 MIXED — "S-led Minority, Package Re-scoped" (P = 0.22)
 
 **Setup**: Coalition loses majority but no left bloc majority emerges. S forms minority with confidence-and-supply from C and MP. Package is partially unwound on legal-risk dimensions.
 
@@ -415,7 +410,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🔴 BEAR — "S+V+MP Majority, Rights-First Rebuild" (P = 0.10)
+#### 🔴 BEAR — "S+V+MP Majority, Rights-First Rebuild" (P = 0.10)
 
 **Setup**: Left bloc gains absolute majority. HD01SfU22 repealed within first 180 days; HD03246 refocused on rehabilitation with SiS capital-investment package; HD03236 replaced with targeted energy-subsidy scheme.
 
@@ -433,7 +428,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD — "Strasbourg Rule 39 Injunction" (P = 0.06)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD — "Strasbourg Rule 39 Injunction" (P = 0.06)
 
 **Trigger**: ECtHR issues interim measure (Rule 39) against Sweden blocking implementation of geographic-restriction orders in specific cases.
 
@@ -445,7 +440,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD — "SiS Capacity Crisis Pre-Election" (P = 0.06)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD — "SiS Capacity Crisis Pre-Election" (P = 0.06)
 
 **Trigger**: A publicly reported SiS capacity-failure incident (e.g., youth transferred to adult facility, escape event, violence incident) within 90 days of election.
 
@@ -457,7 +452,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Indicator Tripwires (Bayesian Update Rules)
+### 📊 Indicator Tripwires (Bayesian Update Rules)
 
 | Indicator | Fires If | Prior Shift |
 |-----------|----------|-------------|
@@ -473,7 +468,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Scenario-Based Decision Recommendations
+### 🎯 Scenario-Based Decision Recommendations
 
 | Role | BASE (0.38) | BULL (0.18) | MIX (0.22) | BEAR (0.10) | WILDCARD (0.12) |
 |------|:-----------:|:-----------:|:----------:|:-----------:|:---------------:|
@@ -484,7 +479,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧪 Red-Team Critique
+### 🧪 Red-Team Critique
 
 **What could make this scenario tree wrong?**
 
@@ -495,7 +490,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md) · [Executive Brief](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md) · [Comparative](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
 
@@ -504,12 +499,11 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Date:** 2026-04-18
 
-## Risk Matrix
+### Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk | Document | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation |
 |------|----------|-------------|--------|----------|------------|
@@ -522,22 +516,21 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | **Economic recovery stall** (external shocks, tariffs) | HD03100 | MEDIUM (30%) | HIGH | 🔴 HIGH | Contingency fiscal plans |
 | **Political crisis before election** | All | LOW (15%) | VERY HIGH | 🟡 MODERATE | Coalition management |
 
-## Top Risk: Youth Detention Capacity Crisis
+### Top Risk: Youth Detention Capacity Crisis
 Sweden's Statens institutionsstyrelse (SiS) — which runs youth detention facilities — was operating at 100%+ capacity throughout 2025. The Skärpta regler proposition (HD03246) will increase the number of young people eligible for closed detention without a corresponding capital investment in new facilities. This is the most immediate operational risk in this legislative package.
 
-## Top Policy Risk: Migration Inhibition Orders (ECHR)
+### Top Policy Risk: Migration Inhibition Orders (ECHR)
 The replacement of temporary residence permits with inhibition orders for individuals facing deportation (HD01SfU22) creates significant litigation exposure. The European Court of Human Rights has consistently ruled that Article 3 (prohibition of torture/inhuman treatment) creates absolute obligations. Geographic restriction requirements and mandatory reporting could face challenges as conditions incompatible with human dignity if applied to vulnerable populations.
 
-## Fiscal Risk: Spring Budget Coherence
+### Fiscal Risk: Spring Budget Coherence
 Sweden has now submitted three fiscal adjustment instruments within two months: the spring proposition (HD03100), the amendment budget (HD0399), and an extra amendment budget (HD03236). While legally permissible, this frequency of budget adjustments signals fiscal policy uncertainty and may attract commentary from Riksrevisionen (Swedish National Audit Office) regarding adherence to the fiscal framework. Riksrevisionen's own report (HD03241) on the fiscal framework application provides a reference benchmark.
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Date:** 2026-04-18
 
-## Overall SWOT: Kristersson Government's Spring Policy Sprint
+### Overall SWOT: Kristersson Government's Spring Policy Sprint
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -552,30 +545,30 @@ graph TD
     style T fill:#B71C1C,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-## Evidence Tables
+### Evidence Tables
 
-### Strengths Evidence
+#### Strengths Evidence
 | Finding | dok_id | Evidence | Confidence |
 |---------|--------|----------|------------|
 | Inflation controlled | HD03100 | World Bank: 2.84% (2024) vs 8.55% (2023) | HIGH |
 | Legislative output high | HD03236, HD03246, HD03240 | 4+ propositions in single week | HIGH |
 | Coalition unity | HD03236, HD03246 | Cross-committee approvals | HIGH |
 
-### Weaknesses Evidence
+#### Weaknesses Evidence
 | Finding | dok_id | Evidence | Confidence |
 |---------|--------|----------|------------|
 | Unemployment elevated | HD03100 | World Bank: 8.7% in 2025 | HIGH |
 | Multiple mini-budgets | HD03236, HD0399 | Third supplementary fiscal measure | MEDIUM |
 | Youth crime evidence gap | HD03246 | BRÅ research on deterrence | MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats Evidence
+#### Threats Evidence
 | Finding | dok_id | Evidence | Confidence |
 |---------|--------|----------|------------|
 | Migration legal risk | HD01SfU22 | ECHR Art. 3 absolute bar | HIGH |
 | Youth detention crisis | HD03246 | SiS reports 2025 | MEDIUM |
 | Economic external shock | HD03100 | US tariff environment | MEDIUM |
 
-## Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc perspective)
+### Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc perspective)
 
 | Dimension | Details |
 |-----------|---------|
@@ -585,12 +578,11 @@ graph TD
 | **S Threat** | SD outflanks on crime and migration; hard to differentiate without alienating center voters |
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Date:** 2026-04-18
 
-## Overall Threat Level
+### Overall Threat Level
 
 | Indicator | Value |
 |-----------|-------|
@@ -600,32 +592,32 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 Rationale: Multiple simultaneous high-probability threats (legal challenge to HD01SfU22, SiS capacity crisis) combined with medium-probability systemic risks (electoral backlash, Riksrevisionen criticism, external tariff shock) produce an elevated aggregate threat posture with medium analytic confidence given dependence on external (ECtHR, US trade policy) variables.
 
-## STRIDE Framework Application
+### STRIDE Framework Application
 
-### Spoofing (Identity/Authority Threats)
+#### Spoofing (Identity/Authority Threats)
 - **Migration inhibition system (HD01SfU22)**: Risk of individuals circumventing mandatory reporting requirements by using false identities. The lack of biometric requirement in some procedures creates vulnerability.
 - **Condominium register (HD01CU28)**: New identity requirements for property registration reduce this threat in real estate fraud.
 
-### Tampering (Data Integrity Threats)
+#### Tampering (Data Integrity Threats)
 - **Public administration interoperability (HD03244)**: New data sharing requirements across government increase attack surface. Requires strong cryptographic protections.
 - **Electronic submissions** to Skatteverket: HD01CU28 enables electronic bouppteckning — introduces digital tampering risk.
 
-### Repudiation (Audit Trail Threats)
+#### Repudiation (Audit Trail Threats)
 - **Fuel tax system (HD03236)**: Complex subsidy/rebate systems historically vulnerable to VAT-style fraud. Requires robust audit mechanisms.
 
-### Information Disclosure (Privacy Threats)
+#### Information Disclosure (Privacy Threats)
 - **Migration inhibition orders (HD01SfU22)**: Mandatory reporting and geographic restriction creates new government databases on vulnerable individuals — GDPR risk.
 - **National condominium register (HD01CU28)**: Property and ownership data aggregation — privacy advocates will flag risks.
 
-### Denial of Service (System Availability Threats)
+#### Denial of Service (System Availability Threats)
 - **SiS youth detention (HD03246)**: Already at capacity; new law will increase demand by estimated 15-20% — actual capacity denial risk is HIGH.
 - **Migrationsverket (HD01SfU22)**: New administrative burden without stated resource allocation.
 
-### Elevation of Privilege (Constitutional Threats)
+#### Elevation of Privilege (Constitutional Threats)
 - **Youth crime law (HD03246)**: Granting prosecutors broader discretion for juvenile detention may enable excessive use without sufficient judicial oversight.
 - **Migration inhibition (HD01SfU22)**: Geographic restriction orders issued by Migrationsverket without automatic court review — ECtHR may consider this insufficient procedural protection.
 
-## Political Threat Matrix
+### Political Threat Matrix
 
 | Threat | Actor | Target | Probability | Countermeasure |
 |--------|-------|--------|-------------|----------------|
@@ -638,23 +630,22 @@ Rationale: Multiple simultaneous high-probability threats (legal challenge to HD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01SfU22
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok-ID:** HD01SfU22 | **Datum:** 2026-04-14 | **Organ:** SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet) | **Typ:** bet
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 The Social Insurance Committee (SfU) proposed on April 14 that the Riksdag approve a government proposition replacing temporary residence permits for individuals facing deportation barriers with a system of "inhibition" (suspension of enforcement). Under the new regime, people who cannot be deported — because of risk of death, torture, or inhuman treatment in their country of origin — will no longer receive temporary residence permits but will instead have their deportation order suspended. They may also be required to report to Migrationsverket or police and confined to a geographic area.
 
 This is a significant tightening of Sweden's migration policy that fundamentally changes the legal status of approximately 2,000-4,000 individuals annually who fall into this category.
 
-## Analytical Lens 1: Political Context
+### Analytical Lens 1: Political Context
 - **Tidö coalition mandate**: The M+KD+L+SD government has systematically reduced migration pathways since 2022
 - **SD influence**: This reform bears the SD fingerprint of closing all alternative pathways to regular stay
 - **Minister**: Migration Minister Johan Forssell (M) is the political owner
 - **Effective date**: June 1, 2026 — just before the September election
 
-## Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
+### Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -676,7 +667,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Opportunity**: Coalition cohesion | SD core demand; strengthens Tidö agreement | HIGH | MEDIUM |
 | **Threat**: Litigation risk | European Court cases on similar frameworks | HIGH | MEDIUM |
 
-## Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives
+### Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives
 | Stakeholder | Position | Rationale |
 |-------------|----------|-----------|
 | **SD** | Strongly supportive | Fulfills core immigration tightening agenda |
@@ -688,19 +679,18 @@ graph TD
 | **Migrationsverket** | Mixed | More clarity on status, but new administrative burden |
 | **Affected individuals** | Severely negatively impacted | Loss of legal status, geographic restriction |
 
-## DIW Score: 6.5/10
+### DIW Score: 6.5/10
 Significant migration policy affecting vulnerable population; politically salient ahead of elections; constitutional and human rights dimensions.
 
 ### HD03100
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03100-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok-ID:** HD03100 | **Datum:** 2026-04-13 | **Organ:** Finansdepartementet | **Typ:** prop
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 The 2026 Spring Economic Proposition (Vårpropositionen) sets the fiscal framework for Sweden's 2026-2029 budget horizon. Presented by Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson, it establishes macroeconomic forecasts, spending priorities, and revenue projections that will guide Sweden through a critical pre-election period. With GDP growth recovering to 0.82% in 2024 (from -0.20% in 2023), unemployment at 8.7% in 2025, and inflation cooling to 2.8% in 2024 (from 8.5% in 2023), this proposition charts Sweden's path out of a dual economic contraction and inflation shock.
 
-## Analytical Lens 1: Macroeconomic Context
+### Analytical Lens 1: Macroeconomic Context
 **Key Economic Indicators (World Bank data):**
 - **GDP Growth**: 0.82% (2024), -0.20% (2023), 1.26% (2022) – recovery underway but fragile
 - **Unemployment**: 8.7% (2025), 8.4% (2024) – structurally elevated, concern for S/V opposition
@@ -709,7 +699,7 @@ The 2026 Spring Economic Proposition (Vårpropositionen) sets the fiscal framewo
 
 **Political framing**: Svantesson will argue recovery is on track under coalition management; opposition will counter that 8.7% unemployment is unacceptable and the extra budget (HD03236) undermines fiscal discipline.
 
-## Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
+### Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -731,7 +721,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Opportunity**: Monetary easing | Riksbank rate cuts if inflation stays low | MEDIUM | HIGH |
 | **Threat**: External shocks | US tariff risks, energy volatility | MEDIUM | HIGH |
 
-## Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Impact Matrix
+### Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Impact Matrix
 | Stakeholder | Position | Impact |
 |-------------|----------|--------|
 | **S (Social Democrats)** | Critical – argues unemployment too high | Jobs data supports criticism |
@@ -741,25 +731,24 @@ graph TD
 | **Households** | Mixed – lower inflation positive, unemployment negative | 8.7% unemployment = 450,000+ Swedes |
 | **Riksbank** | Monitoring for fiscal discipline | Critical of extra budgets |
 
-## Analytical Lens 4: DIW Score
+### Analytical Lens 4: DIW Score
 **DIW Score: 9.5/10** – Spring Economic Proposition is the single most significant annual fiscal document in Swedish politics. It frames the entire year's political-economic debate and sets parameters for all other budget decisions, including HD03236, HD0399.
 
-## Analytical Lens 5: Cross-References
+### Analytical Lens 5: Cross-References
 - **HD0399** (Vårändringsbudget): Sister document with specific expenditure adjustments
 - **HD03236** (Extra ändringsbudget): Energy/fuel subsidies that modify this framework
 - **HD03241** (Riksrevisionens rapport): Independent audit of fiscal framework compliance
 - **HD03101** (Årsredovisning för staten 2025): Financial accounts showing 2025 actuals
 
 ### HD03236
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03236-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok-ID:** HD03236 | **Datum:** 2026-04-13 | **Organ:** Finansdepartementet | **Typ:** prop
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 The Kristersson government submitted a supplementary emergency budget (Extra ändringsbudget) for 2026 reducing fuel taxes and introducing electricity/gas price subsidies. Presented by Finance Minister **Elisabeth Svantesson** with Financial Markets Minister **Niklas Wykman** as co-signatory on the revenue-measure components, this is a politically significant fiscal intervention responding to persistent cost-of-living pressures faced by Swedish households. Coming alongside the Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100 — also authored by Svantesson), this package signals the government's willingness to deploy fiscal tools to address energy costs ahead of the 2026 September elections.
 
-## Analytical Lens 1: Political Context & Actors
+### Analytical Lens 1: Political Context & Actors
 **Principal actors:**
 - **Elisabeth Svantesson** (M) – Finance Minister; owner of the full spring fiscal package (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236) and lead presenter of this extra ändringsbudget
 - **Niklas Wykman** (M) – Financial Markets Minister; co-signatory on the fuel-excise-reduction provisions (Finansdepartementets skatteavdelning)
@@ -769,7 +758,7 @@ The Kristersson government submitted a supplementary emergency budget (Extra än
 
 **Political motivation:** The Tidö agreement (M+KD+L+SD coalition) faces electoral pressure from high energy costs. This supplementary budget serves dual purposes: (1) immediate consumer relief, (2) electoral signal of fiscal competence ahead of September 2026 elections.
 
-## Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
+### Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -791,7 +780,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Opportunity**: Election positioning | Polls show cost-of-living as #1 voter concern entering 2026 | HIGH | HIGH |
 | **Threat**: EU coherence | Sweden committed to carbon pricing; tax cut contradicts climate targets | HIGH | MEDIUM |
 
-## Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives
+### Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives
 | Stakeholder | Position | Rationale | Evidence |
 |-------------|----------|-----------|---------|
 | **S (Social Democrats)** | Critical | Will argue it's regressive, helps wealthy car owners more | Opposition doctrine |
@@ -802,7 +791,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Urban commuters** | Moderately supportive | Public transit alternatives exist | Partial dependency |
 | **Industry (logistics)** | Supportive | Lower operating costs for transport sector | Direct impact |
 
-## Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment
+### Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment
 | Risk | Probability | Impact | Severity |
 |------|-------------|--------|----------|
 | Inflationary signal to market | MEDIUM (30%) | MEDIUM | 🟡 MODERATE |
@@ -810,28 +799,27 @@ graph TD
 | Parliamentary defeat (unlikely with SD support) | LOW (10%) | HIGH | 🟢 LOW |
 | Electoral backlash from green voters | MEDIUM (40%) | MEDIUM | 🟡 MODERATE |
 
-## Analytical Lens 5: Legislative Impact
+### Analytical Lens 5: Legislative Impact
 - **Direct**: Reduces revenue from fuel excise duties; provides credits/subsidies for electricity/gas consumption
 - **Timeline**: Budget changes take effect immediately upon Riksdag approval (Q2 2026)
 - **Constitutional**: Standard budget amendment procedure; requires Finance Committee (FiU) approval
 - **Precedent**: Continues pattern of emergency energy subsidies started in 2022-23 during energy price spike
 
-## Analytical Lens 6: Electoral Implications (2026 Election)
+### Analytical Lens 6: Electoral Implications (2026 Election)
 - **Score: HIGH political salience** – Cost-of-living is Sweden's top electoral issue
 - **Coalition calculus**: SD and M both benefit from this measure; L and KD accept as coalition discipline
 - **Opposition handicap**: S cannot easily oppose consumer relief without appearing out of touch
 - **DIW Score: 8.5/10** – Immediate fiscal impact affecting all Swedish households
 
 ### HD03246
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03246-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03246-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok-ID:** HD03246 | **Datum:** 2026-04-16 | **Organ:** Justitiedepartementet | **Typ:** prop
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) submitted Proposition 2025/26:246 on April 16, 2026 — introducing stricter rules for young offenders (ages 15-17). This is one of the most significant criminal justice measures of the Tidö coalition, expanding punishment frameworks for juvenile crime in response to Sweden's gang-related youth violence epidemic. The proposition follows the government's comprehensive "Agenda för att stärka rättsstat och bekämpa brottslighet" and comes amid heightened public concern about shootings and gang recruitment of minors.
 
-## Analytical Lens 1: Political Context
+### Analytical Lens 1: Political Context
 **Actor:** Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) is the political face of this reform.
 **Coalition driver:** Sweden Democrats (SD) and Moderates have jointly pushed for tougher juvenile justice since 2022.
 **Electoral context:** With September 2026 elections approaching, demonstrating crime-fighting credentials is core to coalition messaging.
@@ -842,7 +830,7 @@ Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) submitted Proposition 2025/26:246 on April
 - Changes to the "ungdomstjänst" (youth service) system to increase deterrence
 - Closer coordination between social services and judiciary for 15-17 year olds
 
-## Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
+### Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -864,7 +852,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Opportunity**: Crime reduction | Targeted early intervention reduces long-term criminal careers | MEDIUM | HIGH |
 | **Threat**: Capacity deficit | SiS youth facilities at 100%+ capacity in 2025 | HIGH | HIGH |
 
-## Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives
+### Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives
 | Stakeholder | Position | Rationale |
 |-------------|----------|-----------|
 | **SD** | Strongly supportive | Core Tidö agenda item; youth crime central to SD narrative |
@@ -877,12 +865,12 @@ graph TD
 | **Social workers/NGOs** | Opposed | Fear punitive approach worsens outcomes |
 | **Police** | Supportive | More tools for persistent young offenders |
 
-## Analytical Lens 4: International Comparison
+### Analytical Lens 4: International Comparison
 - **Denmark**: Introduced similar youth crime crackdown 2020-21; mixed results — repeat offending unchanged
 - **Norway**: Prioritizes restorative justice; lower youth crime rates than Sweden
 - **UK**: Anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) largely failed; lesson for Sweden
 
-## Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment
+### Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment
 | Risk | Probability | Impact | Severity |
 |------|-------------|--------|----------|
 | SiS capacity breach | HIGH (80%) | HIGH | 🔴 CRITICAL |
@@ -890,12 +878,11 @@ graph TD
 | Increased recidivism | MEDIUM (50%) | HIGH | 🔴 HIGH |
 | Electoral benefit materializes | HIGH (70%) | MEDIUM | 🟡 MODERATE |
 
-## DIW Score: 7.5/10
+### DIW Score: 7.5/10
 Criminal justice reform with direct constitutional (rights) and welfare (children) dimensions, politically salient ahead of elections.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -908,9 +895,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 💰 Domain 1 — Fiscal Framework & Supplementary Budgets (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236)
+### 💰 Domain 1 — Fiscal Framework & Supplementary Budgets (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236)
 
-### Comparator Table
+#### Comparator Table
 
 | Jurisdiction | Supplementary-budget frequency norm | Fiscal anchor | Independent audit body | Relevant 2025–2026 practice |
 |--------------|-------------------------------------|----------------|------------------------|------------------------------|
@@ -921,11 +908,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | 🇩🇪 **Germany** | 0–2/year; high political cost | *Schuldenbremse* (constitutional) | Bundesrechnungshof | 2023–2024 Karlsruhe ruling reshaped supplementary-budget politics |
 | 🇳🇱 **Netherlands** | Budget review twice (Voorjaarsnota + Najaarsnota) | *Trendmatig begrotingsbeleid* | Algemene Rekenkamer | 2025 Voorjaarsnota tightened rather than loosened |
 
-### Sweden-Specific Finding
+#### Sweden-Specific Finding
 
 **HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236 together push Sweden above the typical Danish/Norwegian pattern and closer to the Finnish pattern of frequent mid-year adjustment. Riksrevisionen's own report on fiscal-framework application (HD03241) is unusual in timing — an active audit commentary coinciding with the government it is auditing.** `[HIGH]`
 
-### Electoral-Cycle Budget Cluster Comparison
+#### Electoral-Cycle Budget Cluster Comparison
 
 | Country | Pre-election "budget cluster" precedent | Outcome |
 |---------|-----------------------------------------|---------|
@@ -938,9 +925,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 👮 Domain 2 — Youth Criminal Justice Reform (HD03246)
+### 👮 Domain 2 — Youth Criminal Justice Reform (HD03246)
 
-### Comparator Table — Juvenile-Offender Frameworks (ages 15–17)
+#### Comparator Table — Juvenile-Offender Frameworks (ages 15–17)
 
 | Jurisdiction | Detention age-of-liability floor | Closed detention trend (2020–2025) | Rehabilitation / capacity investment | Recidivism rate (18-month) |
 |--------------|:---:|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------|:---:|
@@ -952,13 +939,13 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | 🇳🇱 **Netherlands** | 12 (adapted responsibility) | Stable | "HALT" pre-court diversion | ~32 % |
 | 🇬🇧 UK / England | 10 | ↑ (overcrowding reported) | "Secure schools" programme (2022–) | ~47 % |
 
-### Sweden-Specific Finding
+#### Sweden-Specific Finding
 
 **Sweden's HD03246 moves Sweden closer to the UK/England trajectory (toughening without proportionate capacity investment) and away from the Nordic / Dutch rehabilitation-anchored model (Denmark 2024 expanded capacity first).** `[MEDIUM]`
 
 **BRÅ-analogue research by Netherlands WODC and Norway KRUS consistently finds that deterrence-only reforms without rehabilitation investment increase 18-month recidivism by 3–6 pp. HD03246's implementation design, without paired SiS capital expenditure, matches the failed policy-cluster profile.** `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### Council of Europe / UN-CRC Observations
+#### Council of Europe / UN-CRC Observations
 
 - **UN-CRC Concluding Observations on Sweden (2023)** already flagged juvenile detention overuse. HD03246 will intensify reporting interactions.
 - **CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture)** Sweden report, 2024: SiS overcrowding cited as treatment-integrity risk. HD03246 worsens that vector absent capital response. `[HIGH]`
@@ -966,9 +953,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🛂 Domain 3 — Migration Inhibition / Alternative-Return Schemes (HD01SfU22)
+### 🛂 Domain 3 — Migration Inhibition / Alternative-Return Schemes (HD01SfU22)
 
-### Comparator Table — Alternative Schemes for Deportation-Blocked Individuals
+#### Comparator Table — Alternative Schemes for Deportation-Blocked Individuals
 
 | Jurisdiction | Scheme name | Geographic restriction? | Automatic judicial review? | Reporting obligation? | ECtHR / CJEU case law status |
 |--------------|--------------|:---:|:---:|:---:|-------------------------|
@@ -981,11 +968,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | 🇮🇪 Ireland | *Direct provision* + reporting | Yes | Yes | Yes | Compatible |
 | 🇫🇷 France | *Assignation à résidence* | Yes | Yes (JLD review) | Yes | *K.G. v. France* (2019) — compatible with JLD safeguard |
 
-### Sweden-Specific Finding
+#### Sweden-Specific Finding
 
 **Sweden's HD01SfU22 is the only comparator scheme without mandatory automatic judicial review at the point of inhibition-order issuance. This is the single design feature that converts the scheme from ECtHR-compatible (Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, France) to ECtHR-exposed.** `[HIGH]`
 
-### ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary
+#### ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary
 
 | Legal instrument | Exposure | Mitigation path |
 |------------------|----------|-----------------|
@@ -999,7 +986,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis
+### 📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis
 
 | Design Choice | Sweden (HD03100/HD03236/HD03246/HD01SfU22) | Closest Nordic Peer | Closest "Failed Policy" Peer | Verdict |
 |---------------|----------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------|---------|
@@ -1007,7 +994,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | Youth detention toughening without capacity | HD03246 + static SiS | DK 2024 (toughened WITH capacity) | UK secure schools | Risk-heavy |
 | Migration inhibition without automatic judicial review | HD01SfU22 | DK, NL, DE, FR all have it | None — unique outlier | High-risk |
 
-### Summary Finding
+#### Summary Finding
 
 **Sweden's HD01SfU22 is the single outlier design feature in the package from an international-comparative perspective. The fiscal and youth-justice dimensions follow recognisable peer patterns, but the migration-inhibition scheme diverges from every comparable European scheme by omitting automatic judicial review at issuance.** `[HIGH]`
 
@@ -1015,7 +1002,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🌡️ Index Positioning (Pre- vs Post-Package, Projected)
+### 🌡️ Index Positioning (Pre- vs Post-Package, Projected)
 
 | Index | 2025 Sweden score | 2026 projection (BASE) | 2026 projection (BEAR) |
 |-------|:------:|:------:|:------:|
@@ -1028,13 +1015,13 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md) · [Executive Brief](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md) · [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md)
 
 ---
 
-## Citation Sources
+### Citation Sources
 
 - **OECD Economic Surveys — Sweden** (2024, 2025)
 - **Riksrevisionen — Fiscal Framework Application Reports** (2024, 2025; HD03241 2026)
@@ -1052,12 +1039,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Date:** 2026-04-18
 
-## Document Classification Matrix
+### Document Classification Matrix
 
 | dok_id | Title | Policy Area | Political Valence | Ideological Driver | EU Impact |
 |--------|-------|-------------|-------------------|-------------------|-----------|
@@ -1068,28 +1054,27 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD01SfU22 | Migration inhibition | Migration/asylum | Far-Right | SD core agenda | HIGH (EU returns directive) |
 | HD03240 | Elsystemet laws | Energy policy | Center | Energy security, transition | HIGH (EU electricity directive) |
 
-## Governing Coalition Policy Vector
+### Governing Coalition Policy Vector
 The April 2026 legislative cluster represents a **rightward acceleration** in coalition policy as elections approach:
 - **Criminal justice**: Punitive turn on youth crime (HD03246) advances SD/M joint agenda
 - **Migration**: Systematic closure of alternative legal pathways (HD01SfU22) fulfills SD demands
 - **Energy**: Fossil fuel tax relief (HD03236) prioritizes short-term consumer relief over long-term climate targets
 - **Fiscal**: Spring proposition (HD03100) provides macro legitimacy cover for spending measures
 
-## Conflict Lines
+### Conflict Lines
 **Coalition vs. Opposition**: All four measures have clear left-right fault lines.
 **Coalition internal**: L's liberal values create minor tension with HD03246 juvenile rights provisions and HD01SfU22 humanitarian concerns.
 **Sweden vs. EU**: HD03236 (fuel tax cuts) creates tension with EU's carbon pricing agenda; HD01SfU22 faces EU returns directive compatibility questions.
 
-## Historical Classification
+### Historical Classification
 This legislative sprint is analogous to the Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal expansion (anti-austerity during financial crisis) in its use of supplementary budget mechanisms — but with a more ideologically homogeneous direction (right-populist rather than centrist crisis management).
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **Date:** 2026-04-18
 
-## Document Dependency Graph
+### Document Dependency Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1119,18 +1104,18 @@ graph LR
     style G fill:#F57C00,color:#000000
 ```
 
-## Key Interdependencies
+### Key Interdependencies
 
-### Budget Package Cluster (HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236)
+#### Budget Package Cluster (HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236)
 These three documents form Sweden's spring fiscal package. HD03100 sets the macro framework, HD0399 adjusts existing budget lines, and HD03236 adds an extraordinary measure (energy relief) outside the regular budget cycle. Together they represent the government's pre-election fiscal platform.
 
-### Energy Policy Cluster (HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239)
+#### Energy Policy Cluster (HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239)
 Fuel tax cuts (HD03236), new electricity system laws (HD03240), and wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) form a coherent (if internally tensioned) energy policy agenda: reduce consumer costs in the short-term while building renewable capacity for the long-term.
 
-### Security/Justice Cluster (HD03246 + HD01SfU22)
+#### Security/Justice Cluster (HD03246 + HD01SfU22)
 Youth crime law and migration inhibition orders both belong to the Tidö agreement's security agenda. Both are presented as "firmness" measures and both carry significant implementation risks (SiS capacity, ECHR compliance).
 
-## Previously Covered Documents (April 17 run - NOT duplicated)
+### Previously Covered Documents (April 17 run - NOT duplicated)
 - HD01KU32 (Press freedom TFF amendment)
 - HD01KU33 (Search warrant public records)
 - HD01CU28 (Condominium register)
@@ -1143,14 +1128,13 @@ Youth crime law and migration inhibition orders both belong to the Tidö agreeme
 - HD03232 (Ukraine compensation commission)
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Analysis run:** realtime-1705 | **MCP Status:** LIVE | **Generated:** 2026-04-18T17:10Z
 
-## Data Sources Used
+### Data Sources Used
 
-### riksdag-regering-mcp
+#### riksdag-regering-mcp
 - `get_sync_status()` → LIVE (generated_at: 2026-04-18T17:05:22Z)
 - `get_propositioner(rm: "2025/26", limit: 20)` → 272 propositions total, 20 fetched
 - `get_betankanden(rm: "2025/26", limit: 20)` → 20 fetched
@@ -1160,13 +1144,13 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - `get_dokument_innehall(HD03236)` → snippet only (fulltext_available: true)
 - `get_dokument_innehall(HD03100)` → snippet only (fulltext_available: true)
 
-### World Bank API
+#### World Bank API
 - `get-economic-data(SE, GDP_GROWTH, 10)` → 2016-2024 data fetched ✅
 - `get-economic-data(SE, INFLATION, 5)` → 2021-2024 data fetched ✅
 - `get-economic-data(SE, UNEMPLOYMENT, 5)` → 2021-2025 data fetched ✅
 - `get-economic-data(SE, GDP_PER_CAPITA, 5)` → 2021-2024 data fetched ✅
 
-## Key Statistics Captured
+### Key Statistics Captured
 | Indicator | Latest Value | Year | Source |
 |-----------|-------------|------|--------|
 | GDP Growth | 0.82% | 2024 | World Bank |
@@ -1175,11 +1159,32 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDP per capita | $57,117 | 2024 | World Bank |
 | Riksdag documents (2025/26) | 272 propositions | 2026 | riksdag-regering |
 
-## Documents Analyzed
+### Documents Analyzed
 4 primary documents: HD03100, HD03236, HD03246, HD01SfU22
 Additional context: HD0399, HD03240, HD03239, HD03242, HD03241, HD03101, HD03220
 
-## Data Quality Assessment
+### Data Quality Assessment
 - **Freshness**: Live data as of 2026-04-18T17:05Z — NO STALENESS WARNING
 - **Completeness**: Full metadata + summaries available for all primary documents
 - **Fulltext availability**: Available but not fetched (very large documents) — summaries used
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03246-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/article.md
index 6742a3eaea..f0224459be 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-18
 subfolder: weekly-review
 slug: 2026-04-18-weekly-review
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.840Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.636Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
@@ -40,13 +39,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 > **Sweden's Riksdag delivered the most consequential legislative week of the 2025/26 spring term.** PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled a Spring Fiscal Trilogy (Vårproposition `HD03100` + Vårändringsbudget `HD0399` + Extra ändringsbudget `HD03236` — fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) into a backdrop of 0.82 % 2024 GDP growth (vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 %; World Bank) and 8.7 % 2025 unemployment, the highest since the pandemic. **Konstitutionsutskottet** simultaneously advanced two **grundlag amendments** (`HD01KU32` accessibility + `HD01KU33` digital-evidence search/seizure) — the first substantive narrowing of *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* (1766) in years; because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the **September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency**. **Foreign Minister (Utrikesminister) Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)** and Kristersson tabled Sweden's accession to the **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine** (`HD03231`) and the **International Compensation Commission** (`HD03232`) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg, with Sweden as founding member. The chamber confirmed the Tidöavtalet's working majority on **JuU15** (juvenile-offender tightening, **145–142**) — pure bloc vote, three-vote margin, the thinnest functional majority of the spring term. **HD01UFöU3** authorised 1,200 Swedish troops to Finland under NATO eFP — the first major operational expression of NATO membership. The cluster reveals a **coordinated pre-election legislative sprint** across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, fiscal stimulus, criminal-justice tightening, housing-market integrity, and energy reform. `[VERY HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | Decision | Evidence Locus | Action Window |
 |----------|---------------|--------------:|
@@ -56,7 +55,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
+### 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
 
 1. **The lead story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy** (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236). Fuel-tax cut (82 öre / litre); el/gas relief; Vårproposition reaffirms försvarsanslag glide-path. SEK 60 B+ net stimulus. The **economic-stewardship axis** of the 2026 campaign turns on Q3 2026 macro data. `[VERY HIGH]`
 2. **The democratic-infrastructure story is KU33** (HD01KU33). Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan unless *formellt tillförd bevisning*. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the **strategic centre of gravity**. Two-reading rule embeds the second reading in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag. `[HIGH]`
@@ -69,7 +68,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
+### 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
 
 | Actor | Role | Why They Matter Now |
 |-------|------|--------------------|
@@ -92,7 +91,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Next 30 Days — What to Watch (with Triggers)
+### 🔮 Next 30 Days — What to Watch (with Triggers)
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger | Impact |
 |---------------|---------|--------|
@@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from `risk-assessment.md`)
+### ⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from `risk-assessment.md`)
 
 | Rank | Risk | Score | Status | Mitigation |
 |:----:|------|:-----:|:------:|-----------|
@@ -118,7 +117,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Top-3 Opportunities
+### 🎯 Top-3 Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Source | Window |
 |---|-------------|--------|:------:|
@@ -128,7 +127,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
+### ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -142,7 +141,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md) · [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md) · [Classification](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md) · [SWOT](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md) · [Cross-References](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md) · [Data Manifest](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md)
 
@@ -151,8 +150,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -169,13 +167,13 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 Riksdag Week 16 (2026‑04‑11 → 2026‑04‑17) was the most legislatively consequential week of the 2025/26 spring term and one of the densest pre-election weeks in a decade. The Kristersson government tabled a **Spring Fiscal Trilogy** — Vårproposition (`HD03100`), Vårändringsbudget (`HD0399`) and Extra ändringsbudget (`HD03236`, fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) — into a backdrop of 0.82 % 2024 GDP growth (vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 %) and 8.7 % 2025 unemployment, the highest since the pandemic. Simultaneously, **Konstitutionsutskottet** advanced two grundlag amendments (`HD01KU32` media accessibility under TF + YGL, and `HD01KU33` removing "allmän handling" status from material seized at husrannsakan unless *formellt tillförd bevisning*) — the first substantive narrowing of *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* (1766) in years. **FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)** and **PM Ulf Kristersson (M)** tabled Sweden's accession to the **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine** (`HD03231`, first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg) and the **International Compensation Commission** (`HD03232`). On Wednesday 2026‑04‑15, the chamber confirmed the coalition's working majority on **JuU15** (juvenile-offender tightening, 145–142) — pure bloc vote, three-vote margin, the thinnest functional majority of the spring term. Civilutskottet advanced the **National Condominium Register** (`HD01CU28`, ~2 M bostadsrätter, Lantmäteriet target Jan 2027) and the **Lagfart / ombildning AML rules** (`HD01CU27`). NATO operationalised: **HD01UFöU3** authorised 1,200 Swedish troops to Finland under eFP — Sweden's first major NATO operational deployment. Migration tightened on three vectors (`SfU22` inhibition orders + Prop 235 deportation expansion + Prop 229 reception law) prompting V + C + MP coordinated counter-motions structured for ECHR challenge. The week produced **8 priority risks** (Russian hybrid retaliation post-tribunal at top of register), surfaced **two cross-cluster rhetorical tensions** (press freedom abroad vs at home; green transition vs fuel-tax cut), and consolidated a **coordinated pre-election legislative sprint** across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, fiscal stimulus, criminal-justice tightening, housing-market integrity, and energy reform. `[VERY HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)
+### 🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)
 
 > **Decision**: Lead article with **the Spring Fiscal Trilogy** (`HD03100` + `HD0399` + `HD03236`). **Re-weighting rationale**: Raw significance (10) and DIW-weighted significance (10.0 — fiscal trilogies receive ×1.00 baseline because they are policy-cyclical not democratic-infrastructure) combine with **immediate citizen-impact magnitude** (drivmedel, el/gas, ranta-på-amortering, försvarsanslag) and **electoral salience** (Sweden's economic stewardship is the central 2026 campaign axis). Spring budget weeks are the one fiscal moment of the year when the entire policy mix is on the table in a single editorial frame.
 >
@@ -200,7 +198,7 @@ Riksdag Week 16 (2026‑04‑11 → 2026‑04‑17) was the most legislatively c
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted Rank)
+### 📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted Rank)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -287,7 +285,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📚 Documents Analysed — Depth Level by Document
+### 📚 Documents Analysed — Depth Level by Document
 
 | Dok ID | Title (short) | Type | Committee | Date | Raw / Weighted | Depth | Where Analysed |
 |--------|--------------|------|-----------|------|:--------------:|:-----:|----------------|
@@ -319,7 +317,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings
+### 🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings
 
 > **Note on fuel-tax figures**: This dossier consistently cites **82 öre per litre** as the **statutory excise-duty (energiskatt) reduction** in HD03236 (the Extra ändringsbudget tax-component cut). The PR description's "SEK 2.50 per litre" figure refers to the broader **pump-price effect estimate** including VAT pass-through and prior 2025 indexation reversals as projected by the Finansdepartementet pump-price model. The two figures measure different things; analyses across this package use the statutory tax-component figure (82 öre) for direct comparability with HD03236 fiscal arithmetic.
 
@@ -338,7 +336,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from `risk-assessment.md`)
+### ⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from `risk-assessment.md`)
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -363,7 +361,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix (Week-Aggregate)
+### 🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix (Week-Aggregate)
 
 | Party | Fiscal Pkg (FiU) | KU32/33 (constitutional) | JuU15 (juvenile) | Migration trio (SfU) | Ukraine (UU) | Energy (NU) | NATO eFP (UFöU) | Housing (CU) |
 |-------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -380,7 +378,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Forward Indicators — Next 90 Days (Watch Items with Triggers)
+### 🔮 Forward Indicators — Next 90 Days (Watch Items with Triggers)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Owner / Source | Target Window |
 |---|-----------|---------|---------------|:-------------:|
@@ -399,7 +397,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rule 5/6)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rule 5/6)
 
 | Lens | Specific Implication |
 |------|---------------------|
@@ -411,7 +409,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter
+### 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -426,7 +424,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## 🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Advocate Critique
+### 🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Advocate Critique
 
 | Challenge | Mainstream View | Devil's-Advocate View | Analytic Response |
 |-----------|-----------------|----------------------|-------------------|
@@ -439,7 +437,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference
+### 🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference
 
 | Combination | Mechanism | Strategic Implication |
 |-------------|-----------|----------------------|
@@ -452,7 +450,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## ❓ Key Uncertainties
+### ❓ Key Uncertainties
 
 | # | Uncertainty | Decision Impact | Resolution Window |
 |---|-------------|-----------------|:-----------------:|
@@ -466,7 +464,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Related Artifacts
+### 📎 Related Artifacts
 
 **Reference-grade dossier files**:
 - [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md) · [Executive Brief](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative International](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md)
@@ -483,8 +481,7 @@ Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in [`ri
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied)
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -498,7 +495,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Scoring (0–10 composite)
+### 🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Scoring (0–10 composite)
 
 The composite raw score is the rounded mean of five dimensions per `political-classification-guide.md` v3.0:
 
@@ -514,7 +511,7 @@ The composite raw score is the rounded mean of five dimensions per `political-cl
 
 ---
 
-## 🧮 DIW Multiplier Doctrine (per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1)
+### 🧮 DIW Multiplier Doctrine (per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1)
 
 | Document Class | DIW Multiplier | Rationale |
 |----------------|:--------------:|-----------|
@@ -528,7 +525,7 @@ The composite raw score is the rounded mean of five dimensions per `political-cl
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Master Scoring Table — All Documents Ranked by Weighted Score
+### 📈 Master Scoring Table — All Documents Ranked by Weighted Score
 
 | Rank | Dok ID | Title (short) | Type / Committee | Date | Raw | DIW × | **Weighted** | Confidence | Article Role |
 |:----:|--------|---------------|------------------|------|:---:|:-----:|:-----------:|:----------:|--------------|
@@ -563,7 +560,7 @@ The composite raw score is the rounded mean of five dimensions per `political-cl
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Coverage-Completeness Verification (Rule 5 Gate)
+### 🏛️ Coverage-Completeness Verification (Rule 5 Gate)
 
 > **Rule**: Every document with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 MUST appear as a dedicated H3 section in the published article.
 
@@ -588,7 +585,7 @@ The composite raw score is the rounded mean of five dimensions per `political-cl
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with reasoning)
+### 🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with reasoning)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -619,7 +616,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧪 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Lead Hold Under Alternative Weight Schemes?
+### 🧪 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Lead Hold Under Alternative Weight Schemes?
 
 | Scenario | DIW grundlag-narrowing weight | KU33 weighted | Top-1 Result |
 |----------|:-----------------------------:|:-------------:|--------------|
@@ -634,7 +631,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Significance Distribution Histogram
+### 📊 Significance Distribution Histogram
 
 | Weighted Score Band | Count | Documents |
 |--------------------|:-----:|-----------|
@@ -649,7 +646,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Document Class
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Document Class
 
 | Document Class | Election Salience | Reasoning |
 |---------------|:-----------------:|-----------|
@@ -664,7 +661,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md) §Lead-Story Decision uses this scoring directly
 - [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md) §Per-Document Classification cross-links each row
@@ -676,8 +673,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 5 (DIW v1.0)
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -689,7 +685,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
+### 🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
 
 | Lens | Top Concern Week 16 | Top Action / Posture | Confidence |
 |------|---------------------|---------------------|:----------:|
@@ -702,9 +698,9 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🟦 Lens 1 — Government Coalition (M+KD+L) + SD Parliamentary Support
+### 🟦 Lens 1 — Government Coalition (M+KD+L) + SD Parliamentary Support
 
-### Stakeholder Map
+#### Stakeholder Map
 
 | Actor | Role | Position Week 16 | Election 2026 Stake |
 |-------|------|------------------|---------------------|
@@ -717,19 +713,19 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | **Johan Pehrson** (L, party leader, AM) | Coalition partner | KU33 + migration trio identity strain | Liberal brand under pressure |
 | **Jimmie Åkesson** (SD, leader) | Parliamentary support | 145-142 leverage; migration-trio political owner | Cabinet-entry post-Sep ambition |
 
-### Key Documents Cited
+#### Key Documents Cited
 
 `HD03100` · `HD0399` · `HD03236` · `HD03246` · `HD01KU32` · `HD01KU33` · `HD03231` · `HD03232` · `HD01UFöU3` · `HD01SfU22` · `HD03240`
 
-### Election 2026 Lens
+#### Election 2026 Lens
 
 Coalition will run on a **four-pillar platform**: economic-stewardship (fiscal trilogy + macro execution), law-and-order (JuU15 + police-training HD03237), national security (NATO eFP + Ukraine architecture), migration tightening (SfU22 + Prop 235/229). Vulnerable on Nordic-GDP gap, climate self-contradiction, and L-party identity strain. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🟥 Lens 2 — Parliamentary Opposition (S, V, MP, C)
+### 🟥 Lens 2 — Parliamentary Opposition (S, V, MP, C)
 
-### Stakeholder Map
+#### Stakeholder Map
 
 | Actor | Role | Position Week 16 | Election 2026 Stake |
 |-------|------|------------------|---------------------|
@@ -740,22 +736,22 @@ Coalition will run on a **four-pillar platform**: economic-stewardship (fiscal t
 | **Muharrem Demirok** (C, leader) | Centre-bloc swing | Migration counter-motion architect | Survival via differentiation |
 | **Märta Stenevi** (MP, språkrör) | MP leader | Co-leader on climate + KU33 | MP coalition leverage |
 
-### Counter-Strategies This Week
+#### Counter-Strategies This Week
 
 - **S**: Counter-budget published 2026-04-18 (HD024098 motion class) emphasising Nordic-GDP gap, employment, welfare investment
 - **V**: Sharp KU33 critique; structural opposition to migration trio; demand for Strasbourg challenge
 - **MP**: Fuel-tax-cut climate critique; coalition with V on KU33; constructive engagement on Electricity System Act
 - **C**: Migration counter-motion (with V + MP); own budget alternative; KU33 cross-party negotiation posture
 
-### Election 2026 Lens
+#### Election 2026 Lens
 
 Opposition contests on **cost-of-living + climate + civil-rights**. S best-positioned to claim cost-of-living; V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33 + migration; C survives via differentiation from both blocs. Key risk: opposition fragmentation prevents single PM-alternative narrative. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Lens 3 — Civil Society / General Public
+### 👥 Lens 3 — Civil Society / General Public
 
-### Concerns Mapped to Documents
+#### Concerns Mapped to Documents
 
 | Public Concern | Top Document(s) | Direction |
 |---------------|----------------|:---------:|
@@ -769,7 +765,7 @@ Opposition contests on **cost-of-living + climate + civil-rights**. S best-posit
 | Regional service equity | HD11718 (Skåne), HD11719 | 🔴 Concern |
 | National security | HD01UFöU3, HD03231 | 🟢 Strengthening |
 
-### Civil-Society Voices
+#### Civil-Society Voices
 
 - **Press-freedom NGOs** (SJF, TU, Utgivarna): joint statement on KU33 expected Q2 2026
 - **Domestic-violence shelters** (Roks, Unizon): HD10438 interpellation reflects funding stress
@@ -777,15 +773,15 @@ Opposition contests on **cost-of-living + climate + civil-rights**. S best-posit
 - **Climate / environmental NGOs** (Naturskyddsföreningen, KPR): fuel-tax-cut critique
 - **Lantmäteriet citizen-impact**: bostadsregister change affects ~2 M bostadsrätter holders
 
-### Election 2026 Lens
+#### Election 2026 Lens
 
 Public salience: cost-of-living > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat > migration > grundlag. KU33 only enters top-5 if a chilling-effect case breaks before Sep 2026. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 Lens 4 — International / EU / NATO / Ukraine
+### 🌍 Lens 4 — International / EU / NATO / Ukraine
 
-### Stakeholder Map
+#### Stakeholder Map
 
 | Actor | Role | Position Week 16 |
 |-------|------|------------------|
@@ -798,13 +794,13 @@ Public salience: cost-of-living > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat >
 | **Russia (adversarial)** | Tribunal target + NATO opponent | Hybrid-response posture |
 | **Nordic peers (DK, NO, FI)** | Comparative reference | DK fiscal stewardship benchmark; FI hybrid-response template; NO statutory-trigger model for KU33 |
 
-### Election 2026 Lens
+#### Election 2026 Lens
 
 International reception of Sweden's Ukraine + NATO + grundlag posture is uniformly positive within EU/NATO; Russia + adversarial actors contribute to T1 risk. Cross-party Ukraine consensus precludes effective opposition exploitation; international dimension of campaign therefore **dampened relative to domestic dimensions**. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🏭 Lens 5 — Industry & Business
+### 🏭 Lens 5 — Industry & Business
 
 | Sector | Document Impact | Action |
 |--------|----------------|--------|
@@ -818,15 +814,15 @@ International reception of Sweden's Ukraine + NATO + grundlag posture is uniform
 | Police / public sector | HD03237 (paid police training) | Recruitment ramp-up |
 | Banking & financial services | HD01CU27 (AML) | Onboarding-process update |
 
-### Election 2026 Lens
+#### Election 2026 Lens
 
 Industry generally welcomes the stability of legislative pipeline; concerns on (a) climate signal coherence (HD03236 vs HD03240); (b) implementation timeline for housing register; (c) AML compliance burden. **No major industry actor opposes the package as a whole** — indicating coordinated stakeholder consultation in advance. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 📰 Lens 6 — Media & Investigative Journalism
+### 📰 Lens 6 — Media & Investigative Journalism
 
-### Concerns
+#### Concerns
 
 | Concern | Document(s) | Severity |
 |---------|------------|:--------:|
@@ -836,20 +832,20 @@ Industry generally welcomes the stability of legislative pipeline; concerns on (
 | FOIA/offentlighet workflow disruption | HD01KU33 | 🟠 HIGH |
 | Journalist-source confidentiality | HD01KU33 + JuU15 | 🟠 HIGH |
 
-### Press-Freedom NGO Coordination
+#### Press-Freedom NGO Coordination
 
 - **SJF (Svenska Journalistförbundet)**: prepares remissvar on KU33 + statutory-clarity demand
 - **TU (Tidningsutgivarna)**: industry-association joint statement
 - **Utgivarna**: editorial-independence platform
 - **RSF + Freedom House**: international index implications
 
-### Election 2026 Lens
+#### Election 2026 Lens
 
 Investigative journalism becomes a **double resource**: (a) the operational instrument for accountability through the campaign; (b) the *target* of disinformation under T1 vector. Newsroom resilience programmes + civil-society partnerships are critical defensive infrastructure. `[VERY HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 Influence-Network Map
+### 🌐 Influence-Network Map
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -908,7 +904,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Stakeholder
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Stakeholder
 
 | Stakeholder | Key Election Move | Decisive Window |
 |-------------|------------------|:---------------:|
@@ -925,7 +921,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md) §Cross-Party Vote Matrix maps party-by-document positions
 - [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md) §Stakeholder SWOT compresses these perspectives into 4-quadrant grid
@@ -938,8 +934,7 @@ graph TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 · **Methodology**: 6-lens stakeholder analysis (`political-style-guide.md`) + Election 2026 implication grid (`ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 5 Election lens)
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -951,7 +946,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands
+### 🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands
 
 | # | Scenario | Probability | Trigger Cluster | Pre-Sep / Post-Sep |
 |:-:|----------|:-----------:|----------------|:-------------------:|
@@ -968,13 +963,13 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (P = 0.50)
+### 📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (P = 0.50)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 The M+KD+L government, supported in Riksdag by SD, is re-confirmed after Sep 2026. The Tidö working majority extends. Vårpropositionens fiscal architecture executes; KU32 + KU33 grundlag amendments ratify in second reading; tribunal architecture operationalises; NATO eFP fully deploys.
 
-### Necessary Conditions
+#### Necessary Conditions
 
 | # | Condition | Required Indicator | Probability |
 |---|-----------|--------------------|:------------:|
@@ -984,7 +979,7 @@ The M+KD+L government, supported in Riksdag by SD, is re-confirmed after Sep 202
 | 4 | Russian hybrid response containable (no major event triggering crisis) | SÄPO bulletins | 🟧 M (~0.65) |
 | 5 | ECHR migration challenge does not strike down pre-Sep | Strasbourg docket | 🟩 H (~0.80) |
 
-### Indicators to Monitor
+#### Indicators to Monitor
 
 - Q2/Q3 2026 macro data (KI, SCB)
 - Coalition close-vote frequency post-2026-04-15
@@ -992,7 +987,7 @@ The M+KD+L government, supported in Riksdag by SD, is re-confirmed after Sep 202
 - ECHR docket on inhibition-orders cases
 - Polls trajectory (M+KD+L+SD vs S+V+MP+C)
 
-### Implications
+#### Implications
 
 - ✅ Fiscal trilogy executes; KU33 ratifies; tribunal operationalises; NATO Bn-task-group deploys
 - ✅ Election message: "ekonomin tryggare, brotten färre, försvaret starkare"
@@ -1001,13 +996,13 @@ The M+KD+L government, supported in Riksdag by SD, is re-confirmed after Sep 202
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (S-led minority)  (P = 0.35)
+### 📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (S-led minority)  (P = 0.35)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 S becomes largest party Sep 2026. Government coalition forms on **S minority** + occasional V/MP/C cooperation. KU33 second reading **fails** (or is rewritten). Vårpropositionens fiscal arithmetic re-opened. Migration trio retained but reformed. Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained intact.
 
-### Necessary Conditions
+#### Necessary Conditions
 
 | # | Condition | Required Indicator | Probability |
 |---|-----------|--------------------|:------------:|
@@ -1016,14 +1011,14 @@ S becomes largest party Sep 2026. Government coalition forms on **S minority** +
 | 3 | Climate-credibility erosion mobilises MP/V attentive voters (~1.5 pp) | Polls | 🟧 M (~0.50) |
 | 4 | S leadership crystallises post-election coalition arithmetic credibly | Andersson behaviour | 🟩 H (~0.70) |
 
-### Indicators to Monitor
+#### Indicators to Monitor
 
 - Cost-of-living poll questions + party-of-best-economic-stewardship
 - Climate-policy salience trajectory
 - S counter-budget public reception
 - Government close-vote frequency (signalling weakness)
 
-### Implications
+#### Implications
 
 - ⚠️ Vårpropositionens fiscal architecture re-opened (welfare ↑, försvar ↔)
 - ✅ Climate-policy re-prioritisation (ev fuel-tax retention; HD03240 acceleration)
@@ -1033,13 +1028,13 @@ S becomes largest party Sep 2026. Government coalition forms on **S minority** +
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority  (P = 0.15)
+### 📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority  (P = 0.15)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 S + V + MP combined exceed 175 seats Sep 2026. MP/V enter government. KU33 second reading explicitly rejected. Vårproposition reversed in significant part. Migration trio reversed or partially rewritten. Ukraine + NATO retained.
 
-### Necessary Conditions
+#### Necessary Conditions
 
 | # | Condition | Required Indicator | Probability |
 |---|-----------|--------------------|:------------:|
@@ -1049,14 +1044,14 @@ S + V + MP combined exceed 175 seats Sep 2026. MP/V enter government. KU33 secon
 | 4 | C survives at >5 % parliamentary threshold | Polls | 🟧 M (~0.55) |
 | 5 | V-MP coalition arithmetic with S accepted | Polls + leadership statements | 🟧 M (~0.50) |
 
-### Indicators to Monitor
+#### Indicators to Monitor
 
 - Government close-vote frequency
 - Press-freedom-incident catalysing (KU33 trigger event)
 - Climate-policy salience (Q2/Q3)
 - Polls trajectory (S+V+MP vs M+KD+L+SD)
 
-### Implications
+#### Implications
 
 - ⚠️ Reversal of significant Tidö-deal architecture
 - ✅ Climate-policy strong re-prioritisation
@@ -1067,16 +1062,16 @@ S + V + MP combined exceed 175 seats Sep 2026. MP/V enter government. KU33 secon
 
 ---
 
-## 🌪️ W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation Wildcard (P = 0.20, rising)
+### 🌪️ W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation Wildcard (P = 0.20, rising)
 
-### Trigger Events
+#### Trigger Events
 
 - Major attribution-confirmed cyber attack on Swedish critical infrastructure
 - Sabotage / destruction of Nordic submarine cable
 - Instrumentalised migration on Finnish border (Finnish 2023–24 precedent)
 - Election-disinformation campaign with measurable poll-swing impact
 
-### Cascading Consequences
+#### Cascading Consequences
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1094,7 +1089,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style SD_UP fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### Implications for Base Scenarios
+#### Implications for Base Scenarios
 
 - S1 probability rises to ~0.55
 - S2 probability falls to ~0.30
@@ -1102,15 +1097,15 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🌪️ W2 — ECHR Strike-Down Pre-Sep (P = 0.15)
+### 🌪️ W2 — ECHR Strike-Down Pre-Sep (P = 0.15)
 
-### Trigger Events
+#### Trigger Events
 
 - Strasbourg admits V/C/MP case to merits + issues judgment
 - Partial requirement to add appeal mechanism in inhibition-orders regime
 - Government legal-credibility narrative damaged
 
-### Cascading Consequences
+#### Cascading Consequences
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1128,7 +1123,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style R4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### Implications for Base Scenarios
+#### Implications for Base Scenarios
 
 - S1 probability falls to ~0.42
 - S2 probability rises to ~0.40
@@ -1136,7 +1131,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) — Sep 2026 Outcome
+### 🎯 ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) — Sep 2026 Outcome
 
 > **Doctrine**: ACH evaluates each scenario against each indicator; scenarios that **survive contradiction** with most indicators rank highest.
 
@@ -1156,7 +1151,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🕰️ 90-Day Monitoring Indicators (with Triggers and Bayesian Updates)
+### 🕰️ 90-Day Monitoring Indicators (with Triggers and Bayesian Updates)
 
 | Indicator | Source | Reading Frequency | Direction → Scenario |
 |-----------|--------|------------------|---------------------|
@@ -1172,7 +1167,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
 
 | Lens | S1 | S2 | S3 |
 |------|----|----|-----|
@@ -1184,7 +1179,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md) §Top Risk Indicators feed scenario triggers (R1=W1, R3=W2, R4=S2/S3)
 - [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md) §T1 = W1 trigger
@@ -1197,8 +1192,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if W1/W2 trigger fires) · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian + ACH
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1210,7 +1204,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix)
+### 🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix)
 
 | # | Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Score | Status | Confidence |
 |---|------|:----------------:|:------------:|:-----:|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -1225,7 +1219,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likelihood × Impact)
+### 🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likelihood × Impact)
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1248,7 +1242,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 90-Day Risk Calendar
+### 📅 90-Day Risk Calendar
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger Event | Risk(s) Updated |
 |---------------|---------------|-----------------|
@@ -1265,7 +1259,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Living Risks)
+### 🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Living Risks)
 
 > **Doctrine** (per `political-risk-methodology.md` §Bayesian Updating): each priority risk has named observable signals that trigger explicit prior/posterior updates. Failure to update post-trigger ⇒ stale risk inventory.
 
@@ -1294,7 +1288,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)
+### 🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)
 
 > **Doctrine**: each risk has explicit treatment-ladder rungs. Mitigation success measured against ladder progress.
 
@@ -1311,7 +1305,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🌊 Cascading Risk Map
+### 🌊 Cascading Risk Map
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1347,7 +1341,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Coalition-Fragility Quadrant (Operational Stability)
+### 🎯 Coalition-Fragility Quadrant (Operational Stability)
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1373,7 +1367,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
 
 | Lens | Implication |
 |------|-------------|
@@ -1385,7 +1379,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md) §T1–T8 = same risks viewed as government threats
 - [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md) §T1 deep-dives R1 with STRIDE + Attack Tree
@@ -1397,8 +1391,7 @@ quadrantChart
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if R1 trigger fires) · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md` v2.x (5×5 + Bayesian + ALARP + cascading)
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1410,9 +1403,9 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Government Coalition SWOT (M + KD + L + SD parliamentary support)
+### 🎯 Government Coalition SWOT (M + KD + L + SD parliamentary support)
 
-### 🟢 Strengths
+#### 🟢 Strengths
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence |
 |---|----------|-------------------|:----------:|
@@ -1423,7 +1416,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **S5** | **Cost-of-living relief instrument** — fuel-tax cut (82 öre) + el/gas relief responds to most-cited voter pain point | HD03236; KI Konjunkturinstitutet 2026-Q1 | 🟩 HIGH |
 | **S6** | **Constitutional reform credibility** — KU advancing both KU32 (rights-positive accessibility) + KU33 (investigative integrity) at first reading shows constitutional craftsmanship capacity | HD01KU32; HD01KU33; KU committee record | 🟩 HIGH |
 
-### 🟡 Weaknesses
+#### 🟡 Weaknesses
 
 | # | Weakness | Evidence | Confidence |
 |---|----------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -1434,7 +1427,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **W5** | **Press-freedom-abroad-vs-home contradiction** — championing Nuremberg accountability (HD03231) while narrowing TF at home (HD01KU33) | TOWS S4 × T1; opposition rhetoric library | 🟩 HIGH |
 | **W6** | **L-party identity strain** under migration trio (SfU22 + 235 + 229) — Pehrson must defend liberal brand vs SD-driven tightening | SfU committee record; L party programme | 🟧 MEDIUM |
 
-### 🔵 Opportunities
+#### 🔵 Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Evidence | Confidence |
 |---|-------------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -1445,7 +1438,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O5** | **Anti-money-laundering positioning** via housing reforms (HD01CU27 + HD01CU28) — international financial-integrity signalling | HD01CU27; HD01CU28; AMLD6 | 🟧 MEDIUM |
 | **O6** | **Re-election platform consolidation** — fiscal + brott + ordning + försvar legislative blocks form coherent campaign architecture | HD03100; HD03246; HD01UFöU3 | 🟩 HIGH |
 
-### 🔴 Threats
+#### 🔴 Threats
 
 | # | Threat | Evidence | Confidence |
 |---|--------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -1460,7 +1453,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant Interference Matrix
+### 🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant Interference Matrix
 
 > **Doctrine** (per `political-swot-framework.md` v3.0): cross-quadrant interactions surface strategic centres of gravity that vanilla SWOT misses.
 
@@ -1483,9 +1476,9 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🌈 Stakeholder SWOT — 6 Distinct Perspectives
+### 🌈 Stakeholder SWOT — 6 Distinct Perspectives
 
-### 🟦 S — Socialdemokraterna (Magdalena Andersson)
+#### 🟦 S — Socialdemokraterna (Magdalena Andersson)
 
 | Quadrant | Top Item | Notes |
 |----------|----------|-------|
@@ -1494,7 +1487,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Ukraine consensus participation = statesmanship credit; possible KU33 cross-party negotiation | Both available without giving up core identity |
 | **T** | If KU33 second-reading strategy mishandled, alienates V/MP coalition partners post-Sep | Tactical care required |
 
-### 🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Nooshi Dadgostar)
+#### 🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Nooshi Dadgostar)
 
 | Quadrant | Top Item | Notes |
 |----------|----------|-------|
@@ -1503,7 +1496,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33 (FRA-lagen 2008 precedent suggests 0.5-1.5 pp) | Single-issue framing possible |
 | **T** | Russia's tribunal-retaliation narrative could divide V (anti-NATO faction vs accountability faction) | Internal management challenge |
 
-### 🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharrem Demirok)
+#### 🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharrem Demirok)
 
 | Quadrant | Top Item | Notes |
 |----------|----------|-------|
@@ -1512,7 +1505,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | KU33 cross-party leverage (could broker stricter language in second reading) | Statesmanship moment |
 | **T** | If migration counter-motion fails Strasbourg, brand damaged | Litigation-risk exposure |
 
-### 🟠 SD — Sverigedemokraterna (Jimmie Åkesson)
+#### 🟠 SD — Sverigedemokraterna (Jimmie Åkesson)
 
 | Quadrant | Top Item | Notes |
 |----------|----------|-------|
@@ -1521,7 +1514,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Further coalition leverage on next contentious vote; potentially Cabinet entry post-Sep | Strategic patience |
 | **T** | If Russian hybrid escalation ⇒ campaign reframes to security ⇒ SD's traditional issue ownership questioned | Brand vulnerability |
 
-### 🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel Helldén)
+#### 🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel Helldén)
 
 | Quadrant | Top Item | Notes |
 |----------|----------|-------|
@@ -1530,7 +1523,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Electricity System Act + wind-power municipal share offer climate-policy gains MP can claim | Constructive engagement |
 | **T** | Russian hybrid-event reshapes campaign agenda away from climate | External shock risk |
 
-### 👥 Civil Society / General Public
+#### 👥 Civil Society / General Public
 
 | Quadrant | Top Item | Notes |
 |----------|----------|-------|
@@ -1541,7 +1534,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Mermaid)
+### 🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Mermaid)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1617,7 +1610,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rules 5–6)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rules 5–6)
 
 | Lens | Implication for Government Coalition | Implication for Opposition |
 |------|-------------------------------------|----------------------------|
@@ -1629,7 +1622,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md) §Top-5 Findings + §TOWS Cross-Cluster Interference
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md) §R1 + §R3 trace from T1 + T3 above
@@ -1642,8 +1635,7 @@ graph TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md` v3.0 (TOWS + cross-bloc + scenario-branching)
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1655,7 +1647,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors
+### 🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors
 
 | # | Vector | Severity | Confidence | Frameworks Applied |
 |---|--------|:--------:|:----------:|--------------------|
@@ -1665,9 +1657,9 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧨 T1 — Russian Hybrid Retaliation
+### 🧨 T1 — Russian Hybrid Retaliation
 
-### STRIDE Decomposition
+#### STRIDE Decomposition
 
 | Letter | Threat Class | Manifestation in T1 | Severity |
 |:------:|--------------|---------------------|:--------:|
@@ -1678,7 +1670,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | **D** | DoS | DDoS attacks on Riksdag, Försvarsmakten, Valmyndigheten, energy grid | 🟠 |
 | **E** | Elevation of Privilege | Compromise of Försvarsmakten / SÄPO operational systems via supply-chain or credential attacks | 🔴 |
 
-### Attack Tree
+#### Attack Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1733,7 +1725,7 @@ graph TD
     style L2B1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### Cyber Kill Chain (Election-Disinformation Variant)
+#### Cyber Kill Chain (Election-Disinformation Variant)
 
 | Stage | Manifestation | Mitigation |
 |-------|---------------|-----------|
@@ -1745,7 +1737,7 @@ graph TD
 | 6. Command & Control | Coordinate amplification waves with offline events | Intel-sharing with Nordic-Baltic partners |
 | 7. Actions on Objectives | Reduce coalition margins; suppress voter turnout in critical demographics | Civil-society resilience programmes |
 
-### Diamond Model
+#### Diamond Model
 
 | Vertex | Identification |
 |--------|----------------|
@@ -1754,7 +1746,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Infrastructure** | C2 servers in third countries; social-media bot networks; insider-threat recruiters in diaspora communities |
 | **Victim** | Swedish public sector + critical infrastructure + election integrity + civil-society confidence |
 
-### Mitigation Status
+#### Mitigation Status
 
 | Mitigation | Owner | Status | Confidence |
 |-----------|-------|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -1766,7 +1758,7 @@ graph TD
 | Civil-society resilience programmes | MSB + Civil Defence Agency | 🟡 Underway | 🟧 M |
 | Public information campaign (resilience) | MSB | 🟡 Planned for 2026 | 🟥 L |
 
-### Source Attribution
+#### Source Attribution
 
 - SÄPO Annual Open Threat Assessment 2024
 - Försvarsmakten MUST quarterly briefings (open elements)
@@ -1776,9 +1768,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧨 T2 — Constitutional Accountability Gap (KU33 Narrowing)
+### 🧨 T2 — Constitutional Accountability Gap (KU33 Narrowing)
 
-### Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion)
+#### Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1831,7 +1823,7 @@ graph TD
     style A4_3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping
+#### Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping
 
 | Taxonomy Class | Match | Notes |
 |----------------|:-----:|-------|
@@ -1840,7 +1832,7 @@ graph TD
 | Civil-liberties baseline | ✅ | Investigative-journalism precondition |
 | Electoral-process security | 🟨 partial | Indirect via campaign rhetoric reframing |
 
-### Mitigation Status
+#### Mitigation Status
 
 | Mitigation | Owner | Status | Confidence |
 |-----------|-------|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -1849,7 +1841,7 @@ graph TD
 | Statutory clarity in 2nd-reading amendment | KU + Justitiedepartementet | 🟡 Pending | 🟧 M |
 | International benchmark adoption (Norway-style triggers) | KU | 🟡 Available, not adopted | 🟧 M |
 
-### Source Attribution
+#### Source Attribution
 
 - KU committee record HD01KU33
 - Press-freedom NGO joint statement 2026-Q2 (forthcoming)
@@ -1858,9 +1850,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧨 T3 — Migration-Trio ECHR Challenge
+### 🧨 T3 — Migration-Trio ECHR Challenge
 
-### Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)
+#### Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1894,7 +1886,7 @@ graph TD
     style P5c fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity
+#### STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity
 
 | Letter | Concern | Mitigation |
 |:------:|---------|-----------|
@@ -1905,7 +1897,7 @@ graph TD
 | **D** (DoS) | Court backlog in admissibility processing | Migrationsöverdomstolen capacity |
 | **E** (Elev. Privilege) | Police authority over inhibition orders without judicial pre-review | Judicial-review compatibility text |
 
-### Mitigation Status
+#### Mitigation Status
 
 | Mitigation | Owner | Status |
 |-----------|-------|:------:|
@@ -1914,7 +1906,7 @@ graph TD
 | Judicial-review compatibility text | KU + Lagrådet | 🟡 Pending |
 | UNHCR consultation discipline | UD | 🟢 Active |
 
-### Source Attribution
+#### Source Attribution
 
 - SfU22 betänkande
 - V + C + MP counter-motion text
@@ -1924,7 +1916,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodic Review)
+### 🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodic Review)
 
 | ID | Threat | Likelihood (now) | Status |
 |---|---------|:----------------:|:------:|
@@ -1935,7 +1927,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
 
 | Lens | Implication |
 |------|-------------|
@@ -1947,7 +1939,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md) §R1 + §R2 + §R3 = same threats viewed as risk register
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md) §Wildcards = T1 + T3 escalation paths (W1 → T1 Russian hybrid; W2 → T3 ECHR strike-down)
@@ -1959,8 +1951,7 @@ graph TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if T1 trigger fires) · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md` v2.0 (STRIDE + Attack Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond + Political Threat Taxonomy)
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1973,15 +1964,15 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)
+### 🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)
 
 > A reference-grade analysis must **benchmark against ≥ 5 jurisdictions** so that Swedish developments are interpreted in context, not in isolation. This file places Week 16's six clusters against Nordic + EU peers, and identifies where Sweden *innovates*, where it *follows*, and where it *diverges*.
 
 ---
 
-## 💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context
+### 💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context
 
-### Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)
+#### Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)
 
 | Country | GDP Growth 2024 | GDP Growth 2023 | Unemployment 2025 | Notes |
 |---------|:---------------:|:---------------:|:-----------------:|-------|
@@ -1994,7 +1985,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Key insight** `[VERY HIGH]`: Sweden's 0.82 % growth in 2024 — vs Denmark's 3.48 % — is the **single largest empirical vulnerability** in the government's economic-stewardship narrative. Finland tracks similarly poorly. The fiscal trilogy is a stimulus response to a structural underperformance gap.
 
-### Fiscal Stance Comparison
+#### Fiscal Stance Comparison
 
 | Country | 2026 Fiscal Stance | Comparable to HD03236? |
 |---------|--------------------|:----------------------:|
@@ -2008,9 +1999,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms in Nordic + EU Context
+### 📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms in Nordic + EU Context
 
-### Press-Freedom Baseline (RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025)
+#### Press-Freedom Baseline (RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025)
 
 | Country | RSF Rank 2025 | Score | Press-Freedom Statutory Architecture |
 |---------|:-------------:|:-----:|--------------------------------------|
@@ -2026,7 +2017,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 1. **Sweden uniquely uses constitutional (grundlag) status** for press-freedom architecture; KU33 is a **constitutional** change, not statutory. Norway and Denmark have more flexibility because their architecture is statutory.
 2. The **interpretive variable "formellt tillförd bevisning"** has no direct Nordic peer term — its definition strictness is the primary determinant of post-KU33 press-freedom outcomes.
 
-### EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Context
+#### EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Context
 
 | Country | EAA Implementation Status | Constitutional or Statutory? |
 |---------|---------------------------|------------------------------|
@@ -2040,7 +2031,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ C3 — Criminal Justice (JuU15) in Nordic Context
+### ⚖️ C3 — Criminal Justice (JuU15) in Nordic Context
 
 | Country | Juvenile-offender age threshold | Remand max | Recent tightening |
 |---------|:------------------------------:|:----------:|------------------|
@@ -2053,9 +2044,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 C4 — Ukraine Accountability + NATO eFP
+### 🌍 C4 — Ukraine Accountability + NATO eFP
 
-### Tribunal Architecture Participation (HD03231 / HD03232)
+#### Tribunal Architecture Participation (HD03231 / HD03232)
 
 | Country | Founding member of Special Tribunal? | Damages Commission member? |
 |---------|:------------------------------------:|:-------------------------:|
@@ -2072,7 +2063,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Insight** `[VERY HIGH]`: Tribunal has **broad European participation** but key great-power gaps. Sweden's founding-member status places it squarely in the Nordic + EU consensus; risk R6 (effectiveness without US) is **shared with all participants**.
 
-### NATO eFP (Enhanced Forward Presence) Country Contributions
+#### NATO eFP (Enhanced Forward Presence) Country Contributions
 
 | Country | eFP Battle Group Participation | Operational Year of Maturity |
 |---------|--------------------------------|:----------------------------:|
@@ -2091,9 +2082,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🛂 C5 — Migration / Rights Tightening in EU Context
+### 🛂 C5 — Migration / Rights Tightening in EU Context
 
-### Inhibition-Order Equivalents (SfU22 analogue)
+#### Inhibition-Order Equivalents (SfU22 analogue)
 
 | Country | Inhibition-order regime | Appeal mechanism | ECHR challenges |
 |---------|------------------------|:----------------:|:---------------:|
@@ -2107,9 +2098,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ C6 — Energy + Housing + Sector Reforms in EU Context
+### ⚡ C6 — Energy + Housing + Sector Reforms in EU Context
 
-### Electricity-System Reform (HD03240)
+#### Electricity-System Reform (HD03240)
 
 | Country | Recent comprehensive Electricity Act? | Smart-grid integration |
 |---------|:-------------------------------------:|:----------------------:|
@@ -2121,7 +2112,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Insight**: Sweden's HD03240 places Swedish electricity legislation on par with German + Danish modernisation; the legislative-coherence step is overdue. `[HIGH]`
 
-### Bostadsregister (HD01CU28) — AML Comparative
+#### Bostadsregister (HD01CU28) — AML Comparative
 
 | Country | Comprehensive housing register | AML coverage |
 |---------|:------------------------------:|:------------:|
@@ -2135,9 +2126,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ Russian Hybrid Response Comparative (calibrating R1 / T1)
+### 🛡️ Russian Hybrid Response Comparative (calibrating R1 / T1)
 
-### Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid Incidents
+#### Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid Incidents
 
 | Country | Incident | Year | Sweden-relevant lesson |
 |---------|---------|:----:|------------------------|
@@ -2151,7 +2142,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
 
 | Lens | Comparative Implication |
 |------|------------------------|
@@ -2163,7 +2154,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Summary Table — Sweden's Position vs Nordic + EU Baselines
+### 📊 Summary Table — Sweden's Position vs Nordic + EU Baselines
 
 | Dimension | Sweden vs Nordic peers | Sweden vs EU baselines | Direction |
 |-----------|------------------------|------------------------|:---------:|
@@ -2180,7 +2171,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md) §R1 calibration uses Nordic/Baltic precedents
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md) §W1 wildcard derives from Finland 2023–24 instrumentalised migration
@@ -2193,8 +2184,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 8 (Comparative Benchmarking) + World Bank + RSF + national parliament references
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2206,7 +2196,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary
+### 🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary
 
 | Tier | Definition | Documents This Week |
 |------|------------|---------------------|
@@ -2217,7 +2207,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document
+### 🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document
 
 > Where CIA = **C**onfidentiality (information protection / institutional secrecy), **I**ntegrity (rule-of-law durability + transparency), **A**vailability (citizen access to rights / services). Scored ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦.
 
@@ -2252,7 +2242,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 Domain Distribution
+### 🌐 Domain Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Documents by Policy Domain — Week 16
@@ -2270,7 +2260,7 @@ pie title Documents by Policy Domain — Week 16
 
 ---
 
-## 🎚️ Pre-Election Significance Distribution
+### 🎚️ Pre-Election Significance Distribution
 
 | Salience to Sep 2026 Election | Documents | Total |
 |------------------------------|-----------|:-----:|
@@ -2282,7 +2272,7 @@ pie title Documents by Policy Domain — Week 16
 
 ---
 
-## ⏱️ Urgency Matrix
+### ⏱️ Urgency Matrix
 
 | Decision Horizon | Documents | Action |
 |------------------|-----------|--------|
@@ -2293,7 +2283,7 @@ pie title Documents by Policy Domain — Week 16
 
 ---
 
-## 🔐 Classification Rationale
+### 🔐 Classification Rationale
 
 All 28 documents classified **Public** under [`Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md):
 
@@ -2307,7 +2297,7 @@ All 28 documents classified **Public** under [`Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (Per Classification Tier)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (Per Classification Tier)
 
 | Tier | Election Implication |
 |------|---------------------|
@@ -2318,7 +2308,7 @@ All 28 documents classified **Public** under [`Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md) §Master Scoring uses these classifications as input
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md) §R1–R8 cite the P0/P1 documents for risk-cluster construction
@@ -2329,8 +2319,7 @@ All 28 documents classified **Public** under [`Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md` v3.0
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2341,7 +2330,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Six Thematic Clusters
+### 🎯 Six Thematic Clusters
 
 | # | Cluster | Lead Documents | Total Significance Weight |
 |:-:|---------|---------------|:------------------------:|
@@ -2354,7 +2343,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid Mind-Map)
+### 🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid Mind-Map)
 
 ```mermaid
 mindmap
@@ -2405,7 +2394,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Cross-Cluster Linkages (where the action is)
+### 🔁 Cross-Cluster Linkages (where the action is)
 
 | Linkage | Connecting Documents | Mechanism |
 |---------|---------------------|-----------|
@@ -2419,7 +2408,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Prior-Run Continuity
+### 🔄 Prior-Run Continuity
 
 | Connecting File | Continuity Type | Notes |
 |----------------|-----------------|-------|
@@ -2431,7 +2420,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Forward Continuity (next-run hand-off)
+### 🔭 Forward Continuity (next-run hand-off)
 
 The next analytical runs (daily 2026-04-19 → daily 2026-04-25) should prioritise:
 
@@ -2446,7 +2435,7 @@ Each of those events triggers a **per-event analysis** in the appropriate `analy
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
 
 | Cluster | Election Salience | Notes |
 |---------|:-----------------:|-------|
@@ -2459,7 +2448,7 @@ Each of those events triggers a **per-event analysis** in the appropriate `analy
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md) §Top-5 Developments uses C1–C6 directly
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md) §Master Scoring distributes documents across C1–C6
@@ -2472,8 +2461,7 @@ Each of those events triggers a **per-event analysis** in the appropriate `analy
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 · **Methodology**: Thematic clustering + cross-cluster interference + prior-run continuity (see `political-swot-framework.md` §Cross-Cluster Interference)
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2485,7 +2473,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Purpose
+### 🎯 Purpose
 
 Per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 7, every reference-grade analysis package must include an explicit **methodology self-audit** documenting:
 
@@ -2499,7 +2487,7 @@ This file makes the analysis **legible to readers, auditors, and methodology own
 
 ---
 
-## 📋 Methodology Application Matrix
+### 📋 Methodology Application Matrix
 
 | Methodology | Doctrine Source | Applied to Files | Application Quality |
 |-------------|-----------------|------------------|:-------------------:|
@@ -2525,9 +2513,9 @@ This file makes the analysis **legible to readers, auditors, and methodology own
 
 ---
 
-## 🌫️ Uncertainty Hot-Spots
+### 🌫️ Uncertainty Hot-Spots
 
-### High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)
+#### High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)
 
 These conclusions are well-grounded in evidence and stable under sensitivity analysis:
 
@@ -2537,7 +2525,7 @@ These conclusions are well-grounded in evidence and stable under sensitivity ana
 - **NATO eFP first operational deployment** — official deployment timeline published
 - **Ukraine tribunal architecture** — published treaty text; founding-member status definitive
 
-### Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)
+#### Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)
 
 These rely on interpretation of existing patterns and require update on triggering events:
 
@@ -2547,7 +2535,7 @@ These rely on interpretation of existing patterns and require update on triggeri
 - **Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude** — rising baseline but exact timing uncertain
 - **Q3 2026 macro improvement probability** — fiscal-stimulus lag-time + external-shock risk
 
-### Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)
+#### Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)
 
 These have substantive open questions and benefit from active monitoring:
 
@@ -2558,35 +2546,35 @@ These have substantive open questions and benefit from active monitoring:
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Known Limitations
+### ⚠️ Known Limitations
 
-### 1. Forward-Projection Limits
+#### 1. Forward-Projection Limits
 Scenario analysis (§S1/S2/S3) projects 90-day base + post-Sep behaviour. Beyond Sep 2026, scenario branches collapse to election outcome. Probabilities are **conditional on current conditions** and require Bayesian updates as W1/W2 indicators fire.
 
-### 2. Quantitative Vote-Margin Projections
+#### 2. Quantitative Vote-Margin Projections
 Cross-party vote matrix (`synthesis-summary.md` §Cross-Party Vote Matrix) projects probable positions **for first reading**. Second-reading projections (post-Sep) depend on coalition composition — `[MEDIUM]` confidence at best.
 
-### 3. Russian-Hybrid Magnitude Calibration
+#### 3. Russian-Hybrid Magnitude Calibration
 T1 / R1 calibration relies on **Nordic-Baltic baseline pattern** (Finland 2023–24, Estonia 2024, Lithuania 2021–24). Sweden-specific event probability is interpreted from this baseline. **No insider intel** is incorporated; this is OSINT-only analysis.
 
-### 4. ECHR Docket Speed
+#### 4. ECHR Docket Speed
 T3 / R3 / W2 timing depends on Strasbourg case-admission speed. ECtHR backlog ~22,000 cases; timing genuinely uncertain.
 
-### 5. Stakeholder Position Coverage
+#### 5. Stakeholder Position Coverage
 6 stakeholder lenses cover the major axes but **omit specific industry sub-sectors** (e.g. fishing, maritime, agricultural). For sector-specific impact analysis, additional consultation would be required.
 
-### 6. Macro-Indicator Granularity
+#### 6. Macro-Indicator Granularity
 Economic-data.json provides annual-frequency World Bank data. Quarterly KI + SCB data would be needed for tighter Q3 2026 trajectory analysis.
 
-### 7. Source-Protected Channels
+#### 7. Source-Protected Channels
 This analysis uses only public-domain sources (Riksdagen, Regeringskansliet, World Bank, RSF, FH). No source-protected intel is incorporated. Real-world intelligence operations would augment with classified channels.
 
-### 8. Fiscal-Arithmetic Detail
+#### 8. Fiscal-Arithmetic Detail
 `HD03100` total fiscal package size cited as "SEK 60 B+ net stimulus" — figure approximate from press summaries. Exact number requires FiU committee report parsing.
 
 ---
 
-## 🆕 What Would Strengthen Future Runs
+### 🆕 What Would Strengthen Future Runs
 
 | # | Enhancement | Estimated Value | Implementation Owner |
 |:-:|-------------|:----------------:|----------------------|
@@ -2603,7 +2591,7 @@ This analysis uses only public-domain sources (Riksdagen, Regeringskansliet, Wor
 
 ---
 
-## 📚 Recommendations for Codification
+### 📚 Recommendations for Codification
 
 The following observations are **candidates for promotion into the canonical methodology guides** during the next quarterly methodology sweep (2026-07-18):
 
@@ -2620,7 +2608,7 @@ The following observations are **candidates for promotion into the canonical met
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Quarterly Methodology Sweep Hand-Off
+### 🔁 Quarterly Methodology Sweep Hand-Off
 
 The following items should be raised at the next quarterly methodology sweep:
 
@@ -2632,7 +2620,7 @@ The following items should be raised at the next quarterly methodology sweep:
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)
 
 | Lens | Implication for Methodology |
 |------|----------------------------|
@@ -2644,7 +2632,7 @@ The following items should be raised at the next quarterly methodology sweep:
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`README.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md) §Quality Gate Checklist — verifies methodology-application completeness
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md) §Sensitivity Analysis — methodology stress-test
@@ -2657,8 +2645,7 @@ The following items should be raised at the next quarterly methodology sweep:
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) + Quarterly Methodology Sweep 2026-07-18 · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 7 (Reference-Grade Self-Audit)
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2672,7 +2659,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📄 Persisted Files (in `documents/`)
+### 📄 Persisted Files (in `documents/`)
 
 | File | Dok ID | Title | Type | Committee | Date | MCP Source | Retrieval Timestamp | Selected? (post-DIW) |
 |------|--------|-------|------|-----------|------|-----------|--------------------:|:---------------------:|
@@ -2691,7 +2678,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📚 Documents Referenced But NOT Persisted (in upstream catalog)
+### 📚 Documents Referenced But NOT Persisted (in upstream catalog)
 
 These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream catalogs (week 16 batch download) or in the realtime-1434 deep-dive folder. They are cited by dok_id throughout the analysis package:
 
@@ -2717,7 +2704,7 @@ These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream
 
 ---
 
-## 🔑 Provenance Summary
+### 🔑 Provenance Summary
 
 | Source | Volume This Run | Authentication | Caching |
 |--------|:--------------:|----------------|---------|
@@ -2732,7 +2719,7 @@ These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream
 
 ---
 
-## ✅ Coverage Verification
+### ✅ Coverage Verification
 
 | Check | Result |
 |-------|:------:|
@@ -2746,7 +2733,7 @@ These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Update Cycle
+### 🔁 Update Cycle
 
 | Trigger | Refresh Action |
 |---------|---------------|
@@ -2757,7 +2744,7 @@ These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`README.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md) §File Index lists every persisted + analytical artefact
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md) §Coverage-Completeness Verification mirrors the verification table here
@@ -2766,3 +2753,21 @@ These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream
 ---
 
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-25 · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 2 (separation: data download vs analysis) + §Provenance discipline
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/article.md
index ca04daf3a4..abc5a062a4 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-19
 subfolder: deep-inspection
 slug: 2026-04-19-deep-inspection
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.846Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.642Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, foreign-policy desks, cyber-defence advisors, and senior analysts</em>
@@ -41,13 +40,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 **On 2026-04-16 Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) and PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled Proposition 2025/26:231 (`HD03231`) proposing Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine — the first dedicated aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg (1945–46) and the first criminal court ever to have jurisdiction over the act of starting a war of aggression against a P5-shielded state.** Because HD03231 binds Sweden constitutionally to a Russia-accountability track, it qualitatively elevates Sweden's adversary-threat classification in Russian services' targeting taxonomy — from "Ukraine supporter" to "founding judicial-accountability actor". The 24 months following ratification carry **elevated APT29 (SVR) and GRU Sandworm retaliatory-cyber probability against UD, NCSC, Riksdag IT, and Baltic-undersea-cable infrastructure**, compounding the residual NATO-accession threat wave (March 2024) rather than substituting for it. HD03231 is completely silent on the operational-security requirements of founding membership — **the critical policy gap is not the tribunal itself but the absent SÄPO/NCSC/MSB mandate-expansion package that should accompany it**. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | Decision | Evidence Locus | Action Window |
 |----------|---------------|--------------:|
@@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
+### 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
 
 1. **HD03231 crosses a qualitative threshold in Swedish threat exposure.** The transition from Ukraine-supporter to founding-tribunal-member is the category change that Russian services use to reclassify targets. Historical precedent: ICC staff, systems, and Dutch host infrastructure were targeted by APT29 after the March 2023 Putin arrest warrant. `[HIGH]`
 2. **Constitutional irreversibility is the security-relevant asymmetry.** Unlike arms deliveries (reversible) or sanctions (negotiable), founding membership under a Council of Europe EPA binds Sweden indefinitely — which is both a credible deterrent and a permanent targeting justification. `[HIGH]`
@@ -70,7 +69,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
+### 🎭 Named Actors to Watch
 
 | Actor | Role | Why They Matter Now |
 |-------|------|--------------------|
@@ -88,7 +87,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Next 90 Days — What to Watch (Forward Calendar)
+### 🔮 Next 90 Days — What to Watch (Forward Calendar)
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger | Impact |
 |---------------|---------|--------|
@@ -106,7 +105,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
+### ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -121,7 +120,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧩 What This Brief Does NOT Tell You (Known Limitations)
+### 🧩 What This Brief Does NOT Tell You (Known Limitations)
 
 - **Does not quantify Russian-asset exposure of specific Swedish firms** — Saab civil, Volvo, Ericsson, Nordea Baltics figures are first-order estimates only; a dedicated economic-risk annex would be required for trading desks.
 - **Does not map the full Council of Europe EPA member-state consensus** — 40+ states; the political dynamics inside the Committee of Ministers are summarised but not analysed at depth.
@@ -130,7 +129,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md) · [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md) · [SWOT](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md) · [Cross-References](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md) · [Classification](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md) · [Data Manifest](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md) · [HD03231 L3 analysis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md)
 
@@ -139,8 +138,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-05-03 or event-driven (Lagrådet yttrande, SÄPO bulletin, Baltic cable incident)
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -160,7 +158,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 Sweden's Proposition 2025/26:231 (`HD03231`) formally proposes accession to the **Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA) for the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine** — the first criminal tribunal established to prosecute the crime of aggression since the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (1945–46). Tabled by Foreign Minister **Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)** and PM **Ulf Kristersson (M)** on 2026-04-16, the proposition places Sweden as a **founding member** of an institution directly targeting **Russian political and military leadership** for the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
 
@@ -174,7 +172,7 @@ From the **Russia, cyber threat, and defence** analytical lens, this action trig
 
 4. **Strategic irreversibility and deterrence value**: Unlike policy commitments (arms deliveries, aid packages), founding membership in an international tribunal is **constitutionally binding** and institutionally resistant to reversal. This is the security-relevant asymmetry: the commitment mechanism is stronger than Russia's ability to coerce reversal through below-threshold hybrid operations. `[HIGH]`
 
-### Lead Story Assessment
+#### Lead Story Assessment
 
 | Lens | Significance | Confidence |
 |------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -189,7 +187,7 @@ From the **Russia, cyber threat, and defence** analytical lens, this action trig
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231
+### 🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -206,7 +204,7 @@ From the **Russia, cyber threat, and defence** analytical lens, this action trig
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Document Intelligence Map
+### 🗺️ Document Intelligence Map
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -261,7 +259,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Chronological Framework — HD03231 Timeline
+### 📅 Chronological Framework — HD03231 Timeline
 
 | Date | Event | Significance |
 |------|-------|-------------|
@@ -278,9 +276,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎖️ Strategic Assessment: Security Implications of HD03231
+### 🎖️ Strategic Assessment: Security Implications of HD03231
 
-### Why HD03231 Elevates Sweden's Threat Posture
+#### Why HD03231 Elevates Sweden's Threat Posture
 
 **HD03231 is not just a legal document — it is a strategic signal of permanent adversarial positioning toward Russia's leadership.** Unlike arms deliveries (which can be wound down) or sanctions (which have diplomatic exit ramps), founding membership in a criminal tribunal targeting Putin, Gerasimov, and Shoigu by name (effectively) is **institutionally irreversible** under international law once ratified.
 
@@ -292,7 +290,7 @@ Russia's FSB/GRU threat calculus will process HD03231 through three analytical f
 
 3. **Escalation signal**: Sweden has crossed from "supporter" to "founder" — a qualitative threshold in Russian threat-actor classification. This maps to increased probability of Tier 2 (cyber) and Tier 3 (infrastructure/supply chain) operations.
 
-### Russia's Likely Response Toolkit
+#### Russia's Likely Response Toolkit
 
 | Response Type | Probability | Target | Attribution Challenge | Deterrent |
 |--------------|:--:|--------|:--:|---------|
@@ -307,30 +305,30 @@ Russia's FSB/GRU threat calculus will process HD03231 through three analytical f
 
 ---
 
-## 5W Deep Analysis
+### 5W Deep Analysis
 
-### WHO
+#### WHO
 **Primary actors**: PM Ulf Kristersson (M) and FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) as authors and political owners. Sweden as founding member joins approximately 40+ Council of Europe member states in the EPA framework. The tribunal itself will ultimately target Russian President Vladimir Putin, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu (now Security Council Secretary), and CJGS Valery Gerasimov.
 
 **Affected stakeholders**: SÄPO (Swedish Security Police) — operational response; MSB (Civil Contingencies Agency) — hybrid threat; NCSC (National Cyber Security Centre) — cyber defence; Försvarsmakten — military intelligence; Swedish companies in Russia (Saab civil div, Volvo, Ericsson, IKEA legacy) — economic retaliation exposure; Ukrainian diaspora in Sweden (~50,000) — judicial representation.
 
-### WHAT
+#### WHAT
 Sweden becomes a **founding member** of the world's first dedicated tribunal for the crime of aggression since Nuremberg. The tribunal operates under a **Council of Europe Expanded Partial Agreement** — a legal innovation circumventing UNSC deadlock (Russia's veto blocks ICC aggression jurisdiction over P5 members). Sweden commits to: EPA membership dues (est. SEK 30–80M annually), full cooperation with tribunal subpoenas and evidence requests, extradition regime activation (no immunity for accused).
 
-### WHEN
+#### WHEN
 **Immediate** (Apr 2026): Proposition tabled; SÄPO/NCSC posture should be assessed now. **Q2-Q3 2026**: Committee review and first Riksdag vote. **Sep 2026**: Swedish election — second reading timing post-election. **H1 2027**: Tribunal opens; Russian response escalates to operational phase.
 
-### WHERE
+#### WHERE
 **Legal**: The Hague, Netherlands — tribunal seat. **Political**: Stockholm — Riksdag vote; Brussels — EU foreign-policy coordination. **Operational**: Sweden's CNI (governmental IT, energy grid, telecommunications, undersea cables in Baltic Sea). **Strategic**: Global norm-setting for ICL accountability outside UNSC.
 
-### WHY
+#### WHY
 1. **Legal**: Fills the "aggression gap" in the ICC Rome Statute (Kampala 2017 amendments exclude P5 members from ICC aggression jurisdiction without their consent)
 2. **Strategic**: Irreversibly commits Sweden to Russian accountability track — insurance against future Western wavering
 3. **Domestic**: Cross-party political unanimity (≈349 MPs projected) — rare governance moment
 4. **Security**: NATO framework requires Sweden to align on collective defence commitments; tribunal co-founding is the diplomatic complement to Article 5
 5. **Historical**: Genuine Nuremberg framing — Sweden positions as norm-entrepreneur in the 21st-century iteration of post-WWII order construction
 
-### WINNERS & LOSERS
+#### WINNERS & LOSERS
 
 | Actor | Outcome | Mechanism | Confidence |
 |-------|:---:|---------|:---:|
@@ -346,7 +344,7 @@ Sweden becomes a **founding member** of the world's first dedicated tribunal for
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Forward Indicators (Monitoring Triggers)
+### 🔮 Forward Indicators (Monitoring Triggers)
 
 | Indicator | Timeline | Significance | Action |
 |-----------|---------|-------------|--------|
@@ -359,8 +357,7 @@ Sweden becomes a **founding member** of the world's first dedicated tribunal for
 | Tribunal first indictment | H1–H2 2027 | Russian response will escalate at this moment | Prepare |
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -373,7 +370,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Significance Matrix
+### 📊 Significance Matrix
 
 | Dimension | Raw Score (1-10) | Weight | Weighted Score | Rationale |
 |-----------|:---:|:---:|:---:|---------|
@@ -390,7 +387,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 Ranked Significance Findings
+### 🏆 Ranked Significance Findings
 
 | Rank | Finding | Evidence | Significance Level | Confidence |
 |:---:|---------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -404,7 +401,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 🔍 Sensitivity Analysis
+### 🔍 Sensitivity Analysis
 
 | Scenario Shift | Impact on Significance | Direction |
 |---------------|----------------------|:---:|
@@ -417,7 +414,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 📰 Publication Significance Assessment
+### 📰 Publication Significance Assessment
 
 **Publication Framing Priority**:
 1. **Security dimension** (most underreported, highest analytical value-add): What founding membership means for Sweden's threat posture — cyber, hybrid, disinformation vectors
@@ -433,8 +430,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 - International observers of Swedish foreign policy
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -447,7 +443,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix
+### 📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix
 
 | Stakeholder | Power | Interest | HD03231 Position (−5/+5) | Evidence | Confidence |
 |-------------|:---:|:---:|:---:|---------|:---:|
@@ -471,7 +467,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens & Public
+### 🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens & Public
 
 **Position on HD03231**: Strong public support. SOM Institute and Novus polling consistently show 60-70%+ Swedish public support for Ukraine aid and accountability since February 2022. The **Nuremberg framing** used by FM Stenergard resonates powerfully — "Russia must be held accountable, otherwise aggressive wars will pay off" translates directly to a public that experienced Cold War existential threat and values the post-WWII order.
 
@@ -486,7 +482,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)
+### 🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)
 
 **Position**: Strongly supportive and politically invested — founding-member status is a major foreign-policy achievement PM Kristersson and FM Stenergard will campaign on.
 
@@ -505,7 +501,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)
+### 🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)
 
 **Socialdemokraterna (S)**:
 - **Position on Ukraine/Tribunal**: Strongly supportive. S led Sweden's 2022 response; Magdalena Andersson visited Kyiv. HD03231 represents a continuation of a foreign-policy trajectory that S helped build.
@@ -520,7 +516,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ 4. Security Apparatus (SÄPO / NCSC / MSB / Försvarsmakten)
+### 🏛️ 4. Security Apparatus (SÄPO / NCSC / MSB / Försvarsmakten)
 
 **SÄPO (Security Police)**:
 - **Mission-level impact**: HD03231 ratification is a primary driver of elevated threat posture for SÄPO's FCI (Foreign Counter-Intelligence) and VKT (Violent Extremism) departments. Founding-member status for a tribunal targeting living Russian state leaders creates a **persistent, long-duration threat scenario**.
@@ -541,7 +537,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🏢 5. Business & Industry
+### 🏢 5. Business & Industry
 
 **Saab AB**:
 - **Position**: Net positive. Sweden's sustained Ukraine engagement (confirmed by founding-member tribunal status) creates sustained demand for Saab's Ukraine-relevant systems: AT4 (anti-tank), Carl-Gustaf, RBS-70, Gripen E cooperation. The tribunal signals Sweden will not exit Ukraine engagement — the opposite of Ukraine fatigue.
@@ -557,7 +553,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 6. International Community
+### 🌐 6. International Community
 
 **Council of Europe (CoE)**:
 - Institutional champion; EPA framework architect. Sweden's founding-member commitment is a critical success metric for the CoE post-ECHR reform era.
@@ -577,7 +573,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ 7. Judiciary & Constitutional
+### ⚖️ 7. Judiciary & Constitutional
 
 **Lagrådet**:
 - Review of HD03231 legal text expected before committee consideration.
@@ -589,7 +585,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 📰 8. Media & Public Opinion
+### 📰 8. Media & Public Opinion
 
 **Mainstream Swedish media** (SVT, Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet, TT):
 - Will cover HD03231 through two frames: (1) legal-historical Nuremberg frame (positive, ceremonial); (2) geopolitical-security frame (analytical). The security dimension is significantly **underreported** relative to its significance.
@@ -603,8 +599,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Counter-narrative priority**: The most effective counter-narrative is the Nuremberg frame itself — "holding aggressors accountable is what civilised countries do; Sweden did the right thing." This is also the most politically durable framing across the full Swedish political spectrum.
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -618,7 +613,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Master Scenario Tree
+### 🧭 Master Scenario Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -684,9 +679,9 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📖 Scenario Narratives
+### 📖 Scenario Narratives
 
-### 🟢 BASE — "Ratified + Sustained Below-Threshold Hybrid Pressure" (P = 0.42)
+#### 🟢 BASE — "Ratified + Sustained Below-Threshold Hybrid Pressure" (P = 0.42)
 
 **Setup**: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on security operational gaps (procedural review); Utrikesutskottet betänkande reports broad cross-party support; first Riksdag vote in H2 2026 passes with ≈ 340+ MPs; M-KD-L+SD bloc retains post-election government (or S-led coalition that continues Ukraine line). Tribunal ratified and deposited by Q4 2026; operational commencement H1 2027.
 
@@ -713,7 +708,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🔵 BULL — "Ratified + Security Remediation Package" (P = 0.22)
+#### 🔵 BULL — "Ratified + Security Remediation Package" (P = 0.22)
 
 **Setup**: Lagrådet yttrande explicitly flags the security-gap ("tribunal accession requires Commensurate operational-security posture"); Utrikesutskottet committee recommends a follow-on instruction to the government to propose SÄPO/NCSC/MSB mandate-expansion legislation in H2 2026 vårändringsbudget. Either the current coalition or an incoming S-led coalition adopts the recommendation. A dedicated **Defence Commission 2026 ad-hoc report** on tribunal security obligations is commissioned.
 
@@ -743,7 +738,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### 🔴 BEAR — "Operational Cyber Incident Before Tribunal Opens" (P = 0.18)
+#### 🔴 BEAR — "Operational Cyber Incident Before Tribunal Opens" (P = 0.18)
 
 **Setup**: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on security; government does not upgrade operational posture; SÄPO Hotbildsanalys 2026 flags the risk but is not politically actioned in H2 2026 budget. Between Q4 2026 (Riksdag vote) and Q2 2027 (tribunal operational), a **tier-2 cyber incident** occurs against UD, NCSC, Riksdag IT, or tribunal-adjacent Swedish infrastructure — or a correlated undersea cable sabotage event that is plausibly (but not conclusively) attributed to GRU Sandworm / APT28.
 
@@ -770,7 +765,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Dual-Track Sabotage in Valrörelse Window" (P = 0.10)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Dual-Track Sabotage in Valrörelse Window" (P = 0.10)
 
 **Setup**: A single adversarial campaign combines (1) a Baltic undersea-cable or critical-pipeline incident in the August–September 2026 valrörelse window with (2) a coordinated Swedish-language disinformation surge framing Sweden as an "aggressive US-aligned belligerent". Attribution to Russia is plausible but below formal threshold; amplified by domestic Russia-sympathetic influence networks (legacy Alternative for Sverige / Sverigedemokraterna-adjacent online networks that have since repositioned but whose audiences remain).
 
@@ -790,7 +785,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "US Non-Cooperation Blocks Tribunal" (P = 0.08)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "US Non-Cooperation Blocks Tribunal" (P = 0.08)
 
 **Setup**: The Trump administration (47th US presidency) formally refuses to cooperate with the tribunal on intelligence-sharing, witness deposition, or extradition grounds — framing cooperation as "interference with potential US-Russia negotiation". The refusal undermines the tribunal's evidence-gathering capacity; the first indictments are delayed into 2028 or constrained to evidence available from European intelligence services alone.
 
@@ -808,7 +803,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) Grid
+### 📐 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) Grid
 
 Heuer's ACH is used here to test the **dominant narrative** ("HD03231 triggers elevated Russian cyber threat against Sweden") against competing hypotheses. Consistent = ✅, inconsistent = ❌, ambiguous = ?
 
@@ -831,7 +826,7 @@ Heuer's ACH is used here to test the **dominant narrative** ("HD03231 triggers e
 
 ---
 
-## 🗓️ Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)
+### 🗓️ Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger | Scenario update |
 |---------------|---------|----------------|
@@ -849,7 +844,7 @@ Heuer's ACH is used here to test the **dominant narrative** ("HD03231 triggers e
 
 ---
 
-## 🧩 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work
+### 🧩 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work
 
 | Upstream run | Scenario file | Alignment to this dossier |
 |--------------|--------------|---------------------------|
@@ -861,7 +856,7 @@ Heuer's ACH is used here to test the **dominant narrative** ("HD03231 triggers e
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Bayesian Update Rules (Quick Reference for Analysts)
+### 🔁 Bayesian Update Rules (Quick Reference for Analysts)
 
 If the following signals fire, update priors as shown:
 
@@ -879,7 +874,7 @@ If the following signals fire, update priors as shown:
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md) · [Executive Brief](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md)
 
@@ -888,8 +883,7 @@ If the following signals fire, update priors as shown:
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-05-03 or event-driven (first Lagrådet yttrande or SÄPO bulletin)
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -902,7 +896,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matrix
+### 🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matrix
 
 | Risk ID | Risk Description | Domain | Probability (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Score | Risk Level | Action | Confidence |
 |:---:|----------------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
@@ -919,7 +913,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Risk Heat Map
+### 📊 Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -944,9 +938,9 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🔍 Deep Risk Profiles
+### 🔍 Deep Risk Profiles
 
-### R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score: 20/25 — CRITICAL)
+#### R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score: 20/25 — CRITICAL)
 
 **Context**: Sweden's transition from Ukraine-supporter to co-founding-member of a tribunal targeting Putin/Gerasimov/Shoigu is the most significant qualitative shift in Sweden's threat posture since NATO accession (March 2024). Russia classifies tribunal-supporting states through a threat-actor matrix where "founding member with institutional durability" ranks higher than "arms supplier" (arms can be cut; institutional membership cannot be easily reversed).
 
@@ -975,7 +969,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-### R2 — US Non-Cooperation (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)
+#### R2 — US Non-Cooperation (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)
 
 **Context**: The current US administration's posture toward international criminal accountability mechanisms (ICC, ICJ, multilateral tribunals) is historically reluctant. A second Trump term (2025–2029) creates systematic risk of non-cooperation — or active obstruction — at the tribunal's critical evidence-building phase.
 
@@ -991,7 +985,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-### R3 — APT Compromise of UD Communications (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)
+#### R3 — APT Compromise of UD Communications (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)
 
 **Context**: UD (Utrikesdepartementet) officials are conducting sensitive tribunal planning discussions through government IT systems that are not uniformly classified or isolated. APT29 (SVR Cozy Bear) has a documented pattern of targeting foreign ministry communications in NATO/CoE member states.
 
@@ -1007,7 +1001,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-### R8 — Disinformation and Ukraine Fatigue (Score: 12/25 — HIGH)
+#### R8 — Disinformation and Ukraine Fatigue (Score: 12/25 — HIGH)
 
 **Context**: Russia's active measures infrastructure (IRA, GRU, foreign influence coordination) has demonstrated capability to shift public opinion in Nordic democracies. The 2026 Swedish election provides a uniquely exploitable opportunity: the second reading of HD03231 (ratifying tribunal founding membership) occurs after the election, meaning the newly elected Riksdag decides. If Russian disinformation can shift the election by even 2-3 percentage points toward parties more amenable to Ukraine fatigue narratives, the second reading becomes uncertain.
 
@@ -1021,7 +1015,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis
+### 📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis
 
 | Scenario | Affected Risks | Change | Overall Assessment |
 |----------|---------------|--------|-------------------|
@@ -1033,8 +1027,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | **NCSC cybersecurity uplift for UD** | R3 | −4 points | Score 16→12 (HIGH→MEDIUM) |
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1048,9 +1041,9 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Analysis
+### 🏛️ Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Analysis
 
-### Framework Note
+#### Framework Note
 
 The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 1. **Swedish Government** (policy owner, HD03231 promoter)
@@ -1059,9 +1052,9 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 
 ---
 
-## ✅ Strengths
+### ✅ Strengths
 
-### Strengths — Swedish Government Perspective
+#### Strengths — Swedish Government Perspective
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|---------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1073,14 +1066,14 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 | **S6** | **Low direct fiscal cost** — EPA assessed dues estimated SEK 30–80M annually; reparations architecture (HD03232) funded from Russian immobilised assets (EUR 260B), not Swedish treasury | HD03231 financial annex; HD03232 text | MEDIUM | MEDIUM |
 | **S7** | **Signalling credibility**: Sweden was part of the core working group since February 2022, signed letter of intent March 2026, and now tables founding-member legislation — the commitment trajectory is consistent and verifiable | FM press release timeline | HIGH | HIGH |
 
-### Strengths — Parliamentary/Democratic Perspective
+#### Strengths — Parliamentary/Democratic Perspective
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|---------|----------|:---:|:---:|
 | **S8** | **Two-chamber democratic legitimacy** — unlike executive orders, Riksdag ratification gives the tribunal commitment constitutional durability | RF 10 kap. treaty approval | HIGH | HIGH |
 | **S9** | **Bipartisan geopolitical consensus** cuts across normal coalition/opposition dynamics — the vote on HD03231 will not cleave M vs S but will demonstrate Swedish democratic coherence to international partners | Stakeholder analysis; Swedish foreign-policy tradition | HIGH | HIGH |
 
-### Strengths — Security Apparatus Perspective
+#### Strengths — Security Apparatus Perspective
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|---------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1089,7 +1082,7 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Weaknesses
+### ⚠️ Weaknesses
 
 | # | Weakness | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|---------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1102,7 +1095,7 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 
 ---
 
-## 🚀 Opportunities
+### 🚀 Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
 |---|------------|----------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1116,9 +1109,9 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 
 ---
 
-## 🔴 Threats
+### 🔴 Threats
 
-### Threats — Russia/Hybrid Dimension (Focus Lens)
+#### Threats — Russia/Hybrid Dimension (Focus Lens)
 
 | # | Threat | Probability | Impact | Priority | Confidence |
 |---|-------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1129,7 +1122,7 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 | **T5** | **Economic retaliation against Swedish firms** — Russian government can seize/restrict assets of Swedish companies with remaining Russia exposure (post-2022 exits were not complete; legacy contracts remain) | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 🟡 MANAGE | MEDIUM |
 | **T6** | **Assassination/targeted harassment of Swedish tribunal officials** — historical Russian pattern (Salisbury 2018, Navalny 2020/2024, multiple Baltic/Nordic incidents) elevates personal security risk for tribunal architects | LOW-MEDIUM | HIGH | 🟡 MANAGE | MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats — Legal/Institutional Dimension
+#### Threats — Legal/Institutional Dimension
 
 | # | Threat | Probability | Impact | Priority | Confidence |
 |---|-------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1140,7 +1133,7 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis
+### 🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis
 
 | Interaction | Type | Mechanism | Strategic Response |
 |-------------|:----:|-----------|-------------------|
@@ -1153,7 +1146,7 @@ The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color-Coded Mermaid)
+### 📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color-Coded Mermaid)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1218,8 +1211,7 @@ graph TD
 ```
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1232,7 +1224,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ordered)
+### 🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ordered)
 
 | Threat ID | Threat | Actor | Method | Likelihood | Impact | Priority | Confidence |
 |:---:|--------|:------:|--------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1249,7 +1241,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Cyber Kill Chain Adaptation — Russian Hybrid Campaign Against HD03231
+### 🎯 Cyber Kill Chain Adaptation — Russian Hybrid Campaign Against HD03231
 
 > Adapting Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain (Hutchins et al. 2011) to Russian hybrid-warfare targeting of Sweden after HD03231 founding-member status. This is the **most probable** threat vector given documented Russian APT patterns.
 
@@ -1279,7 +1271,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style AC fill:#880E4F,color:#FFFFFF
 ```
 
-### Kill Chain Stage Analysis — HD03231 Context
+#### Kill Chain Stage Analysis — HD03231 Context
 
 | Stage | Specific Swedish Target | Russian APT Method | Detection Opportunity | Swedish Countermeasure |
 |-------|------------------------|-------------------|----------------------|----------------------|
@@ -1293,7 +1285,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Operation Against Sweden
+### 💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Operation Against Sweden
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1317,7 +1309,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🏗️ Attack Tree — Russian Counter-Tribunal Campaign
+### 🏗️ Attack Tree — Russian Counter-Tribunal Campaign
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1373,7 +1365,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political-Security Adaptation)
+### 🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political-Security Adaptation)
 
 | STRIDE | HD03231 Context | Specific Attack Vector | Countermeasure |
 |:------:|----------------|----------------------|----------------|
@@ -1386,7 +1378,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Threat Severity Matrix
+### 📊 Threat Severity Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1411,34 +1403,34 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🔥 Priority Mitigation Actions
+### 🔥 Priority Mitigation Actions
 
-### T1+T4 — Russian Cyber & Spear-Phishing (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)
+#### T1+T4 — Russian Cyber & Spear-Phishing (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)
 - **Immediate**: NCSC/GovCERT advisory to all UD staff and tribunal-planning personnel
 - **30 days**: Deploy FIDO2-based phishing-resistant MFA across UD Microsoft 365 tenant
 - **60 days**: Conduct adversarial simulation exercise (red team simulating APT29 against UD tribunal planning environment)
 - **90 days**: Establish dedicated SOC monitoring capability for tribunal-related communications
 - **Ongoing**: NATO CCDCOE bilateral engagement for threat intelligence on Russian APT operations targeting tribunal-supporting states
 
-### T2 — Disinformation / Valrörelse (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)
+#### T2 — Disinformation / Valrörelse (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)
 - **Immediate**: MSB Nationellt säkerhetsråd briefing on disinformation threat to HD03231 ratification
 - **30 days**: Prebunking campaign identifying specific Russian narrative templates (Ukraine fatigue, "tribunal is Western propaganda", "cost to Sweden")
 - **Pre-election**: StratCom COE (Riga) engagement for Swedish valrörelse specific disinformation-response support
 - **Operational**: All-party parliamentary group on information security should receive classified briefing on hybrid threat
 
-### T3 — Baltic Sea Infrastructure (🔴 MITIGATE)
+#### T3 — Baltic Sea Infrastructure (🔴 MITIGATE)
 - **Immediate**: NATO MARCOM enhanced monitoring of Baltic Sea suspicious vessel activity
 - **Protocol**: Correlate any Baltic cable incident with tribunal-milestone calendar — attribution signal
 - **Ongoing**: Sweden-Finland-Estonia-Latvia joint patrol agreement for undersea infrastructure
 
-### T4 — Spear-phishing against UD/Tribunal Staff
+#### T4 — Spear-phishing against UD/Tribunal Staff
 - GovCERT advisory (AMBER classification) to all UD personnel
 - Tribunal preparatory committee use of classified communications systems only (no Microsoft 365 for sensitive content)
 - Physical security review of delegation members' devices before international travel
 
 ---
 
-## 🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation
+### 🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation
 
 | Tribunal Milestone | Approximate Date | Expected Russian Response Escalation | Priority |
 |-------------------|:---:|-------------------------------------|:---:|
@@ -1451,8 +1443,7 @@ quadrantChart
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD03231
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03231-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1468,7 +1459,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 
 Prop. 2025/26:231 proposes Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, constituted under the Council of Europe's Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA). The Tribunal — the first dedicated aggression accountability mechanism since Nuremberg — closes the structural gap in the Rome Statute where ICC jurisdiction over aggression requires UNSC approval, making P5 members effectively immune. By joining as a founding state, Sweden:
 1. Acquires co-ownership of a historically precedent-setting international criminal institution
@@ -1479,9 +1470,9 @@ The proposition is expected to receive broad — likely unanimous — UU committ
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Document Intelligence — Six-Lens Analysis
+### 📊 Document Intelligence — Six-Lens Analysis
 
-### Lens 1: Legal Mechanism
+#### Lens 1: Legal Mechanism
 
 **The Aggression Gap**: Under the Rome Statute (Art. 8bis, Kampala 2017), the ICC has jurisdiction over aggression — but only when the UNSC grants authorisation. Russia, as P5 member, can block any referral. The Special Tribunal bypasses this by operating under treaty law outside the Rome framework, with immunity exceptions based on individual criminal responsibility.
 
@@ -1499,7 +1490,7 @@ The proposition is expected to receive broad — likely unanimous — UU committ
 4. Designate national judges for nomination (1-2 Swedish judges typical for such mechanisms)
 5. Cooperate with tribunal requests (evidence, witness protection, asset freezes)
 
-### Lens 2: Political Dynamics
+#### Lens 2: Political Dynamics
 
 **Cross-party alignment** (projected):
 | Party | Position | Rationale |
@@ -1515,7 +1506,7 @@ The proposition is expected to receive broad — likely unanimous — UU committ
 
 **Critical vulnerability**: Second reading requires *new Riksdag* composition post-Sep 2026 elections. If Russian disinformation shifts SD or V, the second vote faces uncertainty. Current projection: 320–349/349.
 
-### Lens 3: Security Implications (PRIMARY LENS — focus_topic: russia, cyber, defence)
+#### Lens 3: Security Implications (PRIMARY LENS — focus_topic: russia, cyber, defence)
 
 **Threat elevation mechanics**:
 
@@ -1531,7 +1522,7 @@ Sweden's founding membership in a tribunal tasked with prosecuting Russian milit
 
 **Gerasimov Doctrine relevance**: HD03231 provides Russia with new escalation rationale under the "existential threat" framing — tribunals challenging the Russian state's legitimacy are classified as hostile acts under Russian strategic doctrine.
 
-### Lens 4: Economic Dimensions
+#### Lens 4: Economic Dimensions
 
 **Direct costs**:
 - EPA assessed dues: SEK 30-80M/year (estimated from comparable mechanisms; not specified in proposition)
@@ -1547,7 +1538,7 @@ Sweden's founding membership in a tribunal tasked with prosecuting Russian milit
 
 **Cost-benefit**: SEK 30-80M annual cost vs EUR 500B+ reconstruction market positioning — a clearly favourable ratio
 
-### Lens 5: Parliamentary Process
+#### Lens 5: Parliamentary Process
 
 **Procedural complexity — two-reading requirement**:
 
@@ -1564,7 +1555,7 @@ Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or ent
 
 **Political risk in election window**: September-November 2026 period is the maximum vulnerability window for disinformation targeting the second vote.
 
-### Lens 6: International Context
+#### Lens 6: International Context
 
 **Founding member status** (confirmed 43 CoE members + potential non-CoE accessions):
 - Nordic bloc: Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Iceland — unanimously supportive
@@ -1576,7 +1567,7 @@ Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or ent
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Evidence Table
+### 🎯 Evidence Table
 
 | Evidence Item | Source | Significance | Confidence |
 |--------------|--------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1593,7 +1584,7 @@ Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or ent
 
 ---
 
-## 🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231
+### 🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231
 
 | Threat | Vector | Target | Severity | Mitigation |
 |--------|--------|--------|:---:|---------|
@@ -1606,7 +1597,7 @@ Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or ent
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Stakeholder Quick Reference (Document-Specific)
+### 📊 Stakeholder Quick Reference (Document-Specific)
 
 | Actor | Role in HD03231 | Position | Evidence |
 |-------|----------------|:---:|---------|
@@ -1620,7 +1611,7 @@ Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or ent
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor
+### 🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Watch Period | Significance if Triggered |
 |-----------|:---:|--------------------------|
@@ -1632,8 +1623,7 @@ Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or ent
 | First indictment issued | 2027-2028 | Maximum political salience moment; tests party cohesion on second vote |
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1645,11 +1635,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 1 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Analogous Tribunals Have Fared
+### 🧭 Section 1 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Analogous Tribunals Have Fared
 
 > Context: HD03231 creates the **first dedicated tribunal for the crime of aggression since Nuremberg (1945–46)**. How did earlier institutional analogues perform — and what does their trajectory tell us about HD03231?
 
-### Historical Benchmarks (≥ 5 Jurisdictional Precedents)
+#### Historical Benchmarks (≥ 5 Jurisdictional Precedents)
 
 | Tribunal | Era | Structural Model | Outcome | Relevance to HD03231 |
 |----------|:----:|------------------|---------|----------------------|
@@ -1664,7 +1654,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 > **Key comparative insight** `[HIGH]`: Of the 8 benchmarked aggression/atrocity tribunals, **zero have failed jurisdictionally once operational** — the primary risk is not institutional collapse but **slow tempo**. ECCC averaged 5.3 years per conviction; ICTY averaged 3.8 years; SCSL averaged 1.2 years (exceptional efficiency, owing to Sierra Leonean state cooperation). HD03231's tribunal operating without Russian-state cooperation and requiring evidence-gathering from active-conflict Ukraine territory implies a projected **4–7 year tempo per conviction**, with first indictments likely H2 2027 and first verdicts no earlier than 2029–2030.
 
-### Head-of-State Immunity — Comparative Outcomes
+#### Head-of-State Immunity — Comparative Outcomes
 
 | Case | Outcome | Signal for Putin indictment |
 |------|---------|----------------------------|
@@ -1675,11 +1665,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 2 — Nordic & EU Comparative: Which States Do What, and Where Does Sweden Position?
+### 🧭 Section 2 — Nordic & EU Comparative: Which States Do What, and Where Does Sweden Position?
 
 > Context: Which comparable European states have taken formal judicial-accountability positions on Russian aggression against Ukraine — and where does Sweden's founding-member status sit in the gradient?
 
-### Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar Design)
+#### Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar Design)
 
 | Country | Tribunal membership | NATO accession | RSF press-freedom rank 2025 | SIPRI 2024 mil-exp % GDP | Posture summary |
 |---------|:-------------------:|:--------------:|:---------------------------:|:------------------------:|-----------------|
@@ -1691,7 +1681,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Comparative takeaway (Nordic cluster)** `[HIGH]`: Sweden's **founding** status differentiates it from Nordic peers. Denmark and Norway are politically fully aligned but have not taken institutional-founding positions. This is the **innovation pattern**: Sweden assumes a norm-entrepreneurship role analogous to its 1966 Palme government's international-mediation tradition. It is also the **exposure pattern**: Sweden's visibility in Russian targeting taxonomy rises relative to Nordic peers.
 
-### EU Baseline (Most-Different Design)
+#### EU Baseline (Most-Different Design)
 
 | Country | Tribunal posture | NATO position | Historical Russia-posture | Comparative note |
 |---------|:----------------:|:-------------:|---------------------------|------------------|
@@ -1706,7 +1696,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **EU takeaway** `[HIGH]`: Within EU, Sweden joins a **founding cluster of 8 states** (SE, DE, NL, FR, PL, EE, LV, LT) at the highest political-will tier. This places Sweden in the **top decile** of EU Russia-accountability posture — a position aligned with the three Baltic states that are already documented APT targets. Sweden's threat exposure over 2026–2028 will resemble the Baltic pattern more than the Nordic pattern.
 
-### Nordic-vs-Baltic Targeting-Rate Comparison (2022–2025, indicative)
+#### Nordic-vs-Baltic Targeting-Rate Comparison (2022–2025, indicative)
 
 | Country | NATO status | Founding-member | Documented APT28/29 campaigns 2022–25 (Mandiant/TAG public reports) | Category |
 |---------|:-----------:|:---------------:|:------------------------------------------------------------------:|---------|
@@ -1723,11 +1713,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 3 — Economic Resilience Against Russian Economic Retaliation
+### 🧭 Section 3 — Economic Resilience Against Russian Economic Retaliation
 
 > Context: Post-HD03231, which Russian economic-retaliation vectors are realistic, and how resilient is the Swedish economy relative to peers?
 
-### Economic Baseline (World Bank WDI 2024)
+#### Economic Baseline (World Bank WDI 2024)
 
 | Country | GDP growth 2024 | Inflation 2024 | Defence spend % GDP | FDI net inflows 2024 ($B) | Exports-to-Russia 2023 ($B est.) |
 |---------|:---------------:|:--------------:|:-------------------:|:-------------------------:|:--------------------------------:|
@@ -1759,7 +1749,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Where Sweden Innovates, Follows, Diverges (Tier-C Required Scorecard)
+### 🎯 Where Sweden Innovates, Follows, Diverges (Tier-C Required Scorecard)
 
 | Dimension | Sweden's position | Classification |
 |-----------|-------------------|:--------------:|
@@ -1778,9 +1768,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 Section 4 — Ukraine Reconstruction Market Benchmarking (Defence-Industry Angle)
+### 🌐 Section 4 — Ukraine Reconstruction Market Benchmarking (Defence-Industry Angle)
 
-### Reconstruction Market Size and Defence-Industry Access
+#### Reconstruction Market Size and Defence-Industry Access
 
 | Source | Estimate (EUR B) | Defence-industry share | Notes |
 |--------|:----------------:|:----------------------:|-------|
@@ -1789,7 +1779,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | EU ReArm package (2025–29) | 150–800 | ≥ 30 % | Includes Ukraine-support budget lines |
 | Ukraine Business Compact (industry initiative) | 500+ cumulative 10-year | ≥ 20 % (defence + dual-use) | Includes air-defence, ground-based replenishment |
 
-### Swedish Defence-Industry Positioning (Post-HD03231)
+#### Swedish Defence-Industry Positioning (Post-HD03231)
 
 | Company | Key product | Ukraine relationship | HD03231 signal benefit |
 |---------|-------------|---------------------|------------------------|
@@ -1803,7 +1793,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignment
+### 🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignment
 
 This comparative-international file aligns with and cites:
 
@@ -1815,7 +1805,7 @@ This comparative-international file aligns with and cites:
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md) · [Executive Brief](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md) · [Scenario Analysis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md)
 
@@ -1824,8 +1814,7 @@ This comparative-international file aligns with and cites:
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-05-03 · **Data freshness**: World Bank WDI 2024 edition · SIPRI 2024 edition · NATO 2024–25 expenditure reports
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1837,7 +1826,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🏷️ Document Classification
+### 🏷️ Document Classification
 
 | Document | Type | Committee (Receiving) | Policy Domains | Priority Tier | Retention |
 |---------|------|:---:|----------------|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1846,7 +1835,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📚 Policy Domain Classification
+### 📚 Policy Domain Classification
 
 | Domain | Primary/Secondary | Evidence | Committee |
 |--------|:---:|---------|:---:|
@@ -1859,7 +1848,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🔒 Access Classification
+### 🔒 Access Classification
 
 | Category | Justification |
 |---------|--------------|
@@ -1869,7 +1858,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Committee Routing
+### 🏛️ Committee Routing
 
 | Stage | Committee | Expected Timeline |
 |-------|-----------|:---:|
@@ -1881,7 +1870,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Content Classification Labels
+### 📊 Content Classification Labels
 
 | Label | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1892,8 +1881,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **Riksmöte** | 2025/26 |
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1905,7 +1893,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Document Relationships
+### 🔗 Document Relationships
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1959,7 +1947,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📚 Reference Documents & Citations
+### 📚 Reference Documents & Citations
 
 | Reference | Type | Relevance to HD03231 | Access |
 |-----------|------|---------------------|:---:|
@@ -1974,7 +1962,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Document Evolution Tracking
+### 🔄 Document Evolution Tracking
 
 | Version | Date | Analysis Depth | Key Changes |
 |---------|------|:---:|------------|
@@ -1983,7 +1971,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 Related Swedish Foreign Policy Instruments (Context Map)
+### 🌐 Related Swedish Foreign Policy Instruments (Context Map)
 
 | Instrument | Date | Relationship to HD03231 |
 |-----------|------|------------------------|
@@ -1994,8 +1982,7 @@ graph TD
 | **GDPR/UD data protection** | Ongoing | UD data security is now relevant to tribunal planning security |
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2008,7 +1995,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Scope of This Reflection
+### 🎯 Scope of This Reflection
 
 This reflection audits **both** the agentic workflow that produced the run (news-article-generator.md with deep-inspection article_types parameter) **and** the analytic tradecraft inside the resulting package. Findings are categorised as:
 
@@ -2018,33 +2005,33 @@ This reflection audits **both** the agentic workflow that produced the run (news
 
 ---
 
-## ✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)
+### ✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)
 
-### 1. Focus-Topic Alignment Gate (existing rule held)
+#### 1. Focus-Topic Alignment Gate (existing rule held)
 
 The pre-existing `focus_topic` gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"DEEP-INSPECTION TOPIC-DATA ALIGNMENT GATE") correctly prevented drift. `focus_topic="Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraina"` matched HD03231 primary content — gate passed → article generation proceeded correctly. **No 2026-04-15 "cyber article from migration data" anti-pattern repeat**.
 
 **Codify as**: Already codified; retain as-is. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 2. Sibling-Run Cross-Referencing
+#### 2. Sibling-Run Cross-Referencing
 
 The baseline synthesis correctly cited `analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/` as reference dossier, inheriting R1 Bayesian prior (16/25 weighted for Russian hybrid retaliation) and upgrading it to 20/25 based on HD03231-specific factors (founding-member visibility, security-silence in the proposition text). This is the pattern that Tier-C §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation" requires.
 
 **Codify as**: Make sibling-run citations MANDATORY for all deep-inspection runs. Add to news-article-generator.md §"Step 1.5" as a 🔴 blocking gate: every deep-inspection run MUST cite ≥ 1 sibling run from the prior 7 days (weekly-review, realtime-monitor, or another deep-inspection). `[HIGH]`
 
-### 3. Per-Document L3 Analysis File
+#### 3. Per-Document L3 Analysis File
 
 `documents/HD03231-analysis.md` (178 lines, 14 KB) contained 6-lens analysis, STRIDE, evidence table, and forward indicators. This is the L3 intelligence-grade depth tier the methodology calls for.
 
 **Codify as**: Retain L3 standard; document the evidence-count minima (≥ 3 evidence points per claim) already in template. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 4. Security-Lens Significance Re-Weighting
+#### 4. Security-Lens Significance Re-Weighting
 
 The synthesis-summary applied a security-specific weighting that elevated HD03231 from raw 9 → weighted 11.5/10 (exceeding the raw-ceiling by design to reflect the pronounced security-lens significance). This honoured the focus_topic without fabricating news value.
 
 **Codify as**: Document the "Security-Lens Weighting v1.0" multipliers in `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` §Rule 5 as a recognised companion to the DIW v1.0 framework. `[MEDIUM-HIGH]`
 
-### 5. Color-Coded Mermaid Coverage
+#### 5. Color-Coded Mermaid Coverage
 
 Every one of the 9 initial artifacts contained ≥ 1 color-coded Mermaid diagram with real dok_ids and actor names. Extended Tier-C files (README, executive-brief, scenario-analysis, comparative-international, methodology-reflection) add another 3–5 diagrams to the package.
 
@@ -2053,8 +2040,7 @@ Every one of the 9 initial artifacts contained ≥ 1 color-coded Mermaid diagram
 ---
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2070,7 +2056,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🔌 Data Sources
+### 🔌 Data Sources
 
 | Source | MCP Tool | Status | Count |
 |--------|----------|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -2086,7 +2072,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📄 Primary Documents Retrieved
+### 📄 Primary Documents Retrieved
 
 | Dok ID | Type | Date | Raw | Security-Lens Weight | Weighted | Role | Depth |
 |--------|:----:|:----:|:---:|:--:|:---:|------|:-----:|
@@ -2099,7 +2085,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Reference Analyses (Cross-Run Evidence Chain)
+### 🧭 Reference Analyses (Cross-Run Evidence Chain)
 
 This deep-inspection package builds on and explicitly cites the following sibling runs within the 72-hour lookback window:
 
@@ -2113,7 +2099,7 @@ This deep-inspection package builds on and explicitly cites the following siblin
 
 ---
 
-## 🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Control)
+### 🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Control)
 
 | Dok ID | Reason |
 |--------|--------|
@@ -2125,7 +2111,7 @@ This deep-inspection package builds on and explicitly cites the following siblin
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 World Bank Economic Context (Captured)
+### 📊 World Bank Economic Context (Captured)
 
 Stored in [`economic-data.json`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/economic-data.json). Indicators matched to detected policy domains (defence, foreign affairs, hybrid threat):
 
@@ -2138,7 +2124,7 @@ Stored in [`economic-data.json`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/
 
 ---
 
-## 🕐 Data Freshness & Staleness Rules
+### 🕐 Data Freshness & Staleness Rules
 
 - **HD03231 publication date**: 2026-04-16 (Regeringen)
 - **HD03231 tabling in Riksdag**: 2026-04-16 (seriously close to this analysis — 3 days)
@@ -2148,7 +2134,7 @@ Stored in [`economic-data.json`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Provenance & Chain-of-Custody
+### 🔗 Provenance & Chain-of-Custody
 
 | Step | Tool / Responsible | Timestamp (UTC) |
 |------|-------------------|:---------------:|
@@ -2162,7 +2148,7 @@ Stored in [`economic-data.json`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/
 
 ---
 
-## 🧪 Quality Gates Applied
+### 🧪 Quality Gates Applied
 
 - ✅ 9-Artifact Completeness Gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"9 REQUIRED Analysis Artifacts")
 - ✅ Tier-C 14-Artifact Gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"14 REQUIRED Artifacts for AGGREGATION Workflows" — extended to `deep-inspection` 2026-04-19)
@@ -2176,3 +2162,22 @@ Stored in [`economic-data.json`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/
 ---
 
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-05-03 or event-driven · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/article.md
index 811016ef61..f70c78db03 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-19
 subfolder: month-ahead
 slug: 2026-04-19-month-ahead
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.851Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.647Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
@@ -41,13 +40,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 > **With 147 days until the 13 September 2026 general election, the Swedish Riksdag enters its most legislatively compressed 30-day window of the 2025/26 term.** PM **Ulf Kristersson (M)** is delivering a **Spring Fiscal Trilogy** — Vårproposition `HD03100` + Vårändringsbudget `HD0399` + Extra ändringsbudget `HD03236` (82-öre fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) — into a macro backdrop of **0.82 % 2024 GDP growth** (Nordic-bottom vs Denmark 3.48 %, Norway 2.10 %, Finland 0.42 %; World Bank) and **8.69 % 2025 unemployment** (the Nordic-highest since 2021). **Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)** advances the **Ukraine accountability architecture** (`HD03231` Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression + `HD03232` Reparations Commission) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg, with Sweden as founding member. **Justice / Migration ministers** table a coordinated **Migration + Criminal-Justice Blitz**: new reception law (`HD03229`), stricter deportation rules (`HD03235`), inhibition orders (`HD01SfU22`), juvenile tightening (`HD03246`), and paid police training (`HD03237`) — met by **7+ coordinated V/MP/C/S counter-motions** structured as an ECHR-litigation predicate. **Konstitutionsutskottet** advances two *vilande* grundlag amendments (`HD01KU32` accessibility + `HD01KU33` digital-evidence search/seizure) — their **2nd reading is embedded in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag**, making the September election a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency. **HD01UFöU3** (NATO Finland eFP, 1,200 Swedish troops) is imminent for chamber vote (**week of 2026-04-20 → 24**) — Sweden's first operational NATO output. The cluster reveals a **pre-election maximalist agenda** across fiscal stimulus, migration closure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, and constitutional restructuring. `[VERY HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | # | Decision | Evidence Locus | Action Window |
 |:-:|----------|---------------|--------------:|
@@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 What Editors Need in 60 Seconds
+### 📐 What Editors Need in 60 Seconds
 
 1. **The economic-stewardship story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy.** Sweden's 0.82 % GDP growth (lowest in Nordics) + 8.69 % unemployment is the **single largest empirical vulnerability** in the Tidö-coalition economic narrative. Fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief is fiscally significant (≈ SEK 40–60 B net stimulus estimate) and politically targeted at rural/car-dependent voters who align with SD base. Nordic benchmark: Denmark + Norway retain carbon-pricing discipline; Sweden's fuel-tax cut is a **Nordic outlier**. `[VERY HIGH]`
 
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named Actors to Watch (April–May 2026)
+### 🎭 Named Actors to Watch (April–May 2026)
 
 | Actor | Role | Why They Matter This Month |
 |-------|------|----------------------------|
@@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Priority)
+### 📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Priority)
 
 | Date | Vote | Committee | Expected Outcome |
 |------|------|-----------|-----------------|
@@ -116,7 +115,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condensed)
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condensed)
 
 | Lens | Specific Implication |
 |------|---------------------|
@@ -128,7 +127,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month
+### ⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month
 
 1. **R2 — Economic credibility under Riksbank/NIER scrutiny** (L×I = 12): Spring budget expansion while unemployment rises; `[VERY HIGH]` confidence on macro baseline
 2. **R6 — Reception-law post-enactment ECHR challenge** (L×I = 12): V/C/MP-prepared litigation predicate; Article 3/8 ECHR plausible
@@ -140,7 +139,7 @@ Full treatment: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter (Monthly Forecast)
+### 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter (Monthly Forecast)
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -154,7 +153,7 @@ Full treatment: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Related Artefacts (full package)
+### 📎 Related Artefacts (full package)
 
 **Tier-A**: [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/README.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md) · this Executive Brief
 **Tier-B**: [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md) · [Classification](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md) · [SWOT](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md) · [Cross-Reference Map](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md)
@@ -168,8 +167,7 @@ Full treatment: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-26 (weekly) · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied).
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19T11:30:00Z
 **Article Type**: month-ahead
@@ -179,7 +177,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 
 The Swedish Riksdag enters a pivotal legislative sprint in late April–May 2026, with the **2026 Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)** and supplementary budgets dominating Finance Committee work, while a multi-bill **Ukraine solidarity cluster** (three interrelated propositions) moves toward plenary votes. A parallel **migration and justice legislative blitz** — encompassing the new reception law, stricter deportation rules, and juvenile justice reform — faces intense opposition from V, MP, C, and S, signalling some of the most contentious votes of the current parliamentary session. With the September 2026 election horizon now dominating political calculations, every vote carries double weight as both governance and campaign positioning.
 
@@ -187,7 +185,7 @@ The Swedish Riksdag enters a pivotal legislative sprint in late April–May 2026
 
 ---
 
-## Key Legislative Milestones (Apr 19 – May 19, 2026)
+### Key Legislative Milestones (Apr 19 – May 19, 2026)
 
 | Priority | Document | Committee | Status | Estimated Vote |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -210,7 +208,7 @@ The Swedish Riksdag enters a pivotal legislative sprint in late April–May 2026
 
 ---
 
-## Thematic Clusters (Cross-Document Pattern Analysis)
+### Thematic Clusters (Cross-Document Pattern Analysis)
 
 **1. Ukraine Solidarity Cluster** [🟩HIGH confidence]: Three Ukraine-related propositions (HD03231, HD03232, HD03220) represent the largest single-day Ukraine legislative push Sweden has undertaken since the February 2022 invasion. The joint foreign affairs/defense committee (UFöU) has already issued its report on NATO Finland deployment. This cluster will likely pass with broad cross-party support.
 
@@ -224,7 +222,7 @@ The Swedish Riksdag enters a pivotal legislative sprint in late April–May 2026
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Watch Points (Specific Triggers)
+### Forward Watch Points (Specific Triggers)
 
 1. **FiU committee report on HD03236 (Fuel Tax Cut)**: Expected within 2 weeks. MP and V motions (HD024092, HD024098) to reject fuel tax cut pending. Vote likely late April / early May 2026. Outcome: Coalition expected to pass, opposition united against. **Trigger**: Committee report publication date.
 
@@ -238,7 +236,7 @@ The Swedish Riksdag enters a pivotal legislative sprint in late April–May 2026
 
 ---
 
-## Election 2026 Implications
+### Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Election date**: September 13, 2026 (expected)
 **Days remaining**: ~147 days
@@ -254,8 +252,7 @@ The legislative agenda April–May 2026 is deeply shaped by election positioning
 **Coalition stability indicator**: 🟩HIGH — Tidö coalition has sufficient votes on all tracked bills. No defection risk identified through May 2026.
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19T11:35:00Z
 **Article Type**: month-ahead
@@ -263,7 +260,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Top-Scoring Legislative Items
+### Top-Scoring Legislative Items
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title | Policy Domain | Score (0-100) | Election Relevance | Cross-Party Conflict |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -290,7 +287,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Scoring Methodology
+### Scoring Methodology
 
 Scores are computed as a weighted composite:
 - **Policy impact** (30%): How many citizens/institutions affected and how deeply
@@ -301,15 +298,14 @@ Scores are computed as a weighted composite:
 
 ---
 
-## Key Insight: Pre-Election Legislative Compression
+### Key Insight: Pre-Election Legislative Compression
 
 The 2025/26 riksmöte is on track to be the most legislatively active session of the Tidö coalition's term. The concentration of high-significance bills in April–May 2026 (all 20 top-scoring items submitted between April 9–17, 2026) indicates deliberate legislative acceleration before the summer recess and September election. This is consistent with international patterns of incumbent governments front-loading their policy agenda in the final parliamentary session before an election.
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19T11:36:00Z
 **Article Type**: month-ahead
@@ -317,7 +313,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Citizens & Households
+### 1. Citizens & Households
 
 **Primary concern**: Economic anxiety — unemployment at 8.69%, weak GDP growth (0.82% in 2024)
 **Immediate benefit**: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) reduces petrol/diesel costs directly; parental allowance simplification (HD01SfU20) reduces administrative burden
@@ -327,7 +323,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)
+### 2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)
 
 **M (Moderaterna) — Ulf Kristersson**:
 - Championing Ukraine solidarity cluster as foreign policy legacy
@@ -354,7 +350,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Opposition Bloc
+### 3. Opposition Bloc
 
 **S (Socialdemokraterna) — Magdalena Andersson**:
 - Filed motions on reception law (HD024080), supplementary budget (HD024082), settlement law (HD024079)
@@ -380,7 +376,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Business & Industry
+### 4. Business & Industry
 
 **Energy sector**: Strongly welcomes new electricity system laws (HD03240) and permanent EV charging tax relief (HD01SkU23). Wind energy companies benefit from revenue-sharing law (HD03239) enabling faster municipal permit approval.
 
@@ -394,7 +390,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Civil Society
+### 5. Civil Society
 
 **Women's rights organisations**: Deep concern about women's shelter closures (HD10438); cautiously positive on violence against women strategy (HD03245) but awaiting funding commitments.
 
@@ -406,7 +402,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 6. International/EU
+### 6. International/EU
 
 **EU Commission**: Monitoring Sweden's implementation of EU accessibility directive (basis for HD01KU32); will receive notification on fuel tax subsidy (state aid assessment).
 
@@ -418,7 +414,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Judiciary/Constitutional Experts
+### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional Experts
 
 **Constitutional law community**: Two "vilande" fundamental law changes (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) following correct procedure; concerns about HD01KU33 implications for press freedom and right to inspect public documents.
 
@@ -428,7 +424,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Media/Public Opinion
+### 8. Media/Public Opinion
 
 **Major focus topics** (predicted high coverage in April–May 2026):
 1. Spring budget and fuel tax cut (HD03236) — economic story of the month
@@ -442,8 +438,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Social media dynamics**: Fuel tax cut and deportation rules expected to trend heavily. Ukraine solidarity likely positive sentiment across partisan lines.
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -455,7 +450,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands (30-day + post-election)
+### 🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands (30-day + post-election)
 
 | # | Scenario | 30-day P | 90-day P | Post-Sep P | Trigger Cluster | Aligned with upstream |
 |:-:|----------|:--------:|:--------:|:----------:|-----------------|----------------------|
@@ -481,13 +476,13 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (30-day P = 0.85 · post-Sep P = 0.50)
+### 📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (30-day P = 0.85 · post-Sep P = 0.50)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 The Tidö working majority (M+KD+L + SD support) passes all five legislative clusters. The JuU15 145–142 signature holds on every cross-bloc vote. Spring fiscal trilogy executes; KU32 + KU33 first readings pass (vilande); Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission architecture passes with ≈ 349 MPs; NATO eFP deploys 1,200 troops to Finland by 2026-Q3. Post-Sep-2026 re-election confirms the coalition, and KU32/KU33 second readings ratify. Migration blitz enters the statute book.
 
-### Necessary Conditions (30-day horizon)
+#### Necessary Conditions (30-day horizon)
 
 | # | Condition | Required Indicator | Probability |
 |---|-----------|--------------------|:------------:|
@@ -498,7 +493,7 @@ The Tidö working majority (M+KD+L + SD support) passes all five legislative clu
 | 5 | No major coalition internal fracture (L defection on migration, KD defection on fuel-tax) | Media tracking · interpellation log | 🟩 H (~0.82) |
 | 6 | Russian hybrid response contained (no major escalation event) | SÄPO bulletins · Nordic event log | 🟧 M (~0.75) |
 
-### Indicators to Monitor (30-day)
+#### Indicators to Monitor (30-day)
 
 - **2026-04-21** FiU committee report on HD03236 (trigger: publication)
 - **2026-04-22** Kammarvote on HD03236 (trigger: chamber protocol)
@@ -509,7 +504,7 @@ The Tidö working majority (M+KD+L + SD support) passes all five legislative clu
 - **2026-05-28** SCB labour-force survey release (trigger: data release)
 - **2026-06-03** KI Konjunkturinstitutet baseline update (trigger: publication)
 
-### Implications (policy + narrative)
+#### Implications (policy + narrative)
 
 - ✅ Fiscal trilogy delivers; government gains pre-election narrative of delivery
 - ✅ Ukraine tribunal architecture operationalises; norm-entrepreneurship campaign asset
@@ -521,13 +516,13 @@ The Tidö working majority (M+KD+L + SD support) passes all five legislative clu
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (post-Sep P = 0.35)
+### 📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (post-Sep P = 0.35)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 September 2026 produces an S-led minority government, with V/MP/C occasional cooperation. KU33 second reading **fails** or is rewritten. Vårpropositionens fiscal arithmetic re-opened in the 2026/27 Riksmöte. Migration trio retained but substantively reformed (SfU22 inhibition tightened; reception-law procedural protections restored). Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained intact (cross-party consensus).
 
-### Necessary Conditions
+#### Necessary Conditions
 
 | # | Condition | Required Indicator | Probability |
 |---|-----------|--------------------|:------------:|
@@ -537,11 +532,11 @@ September 2026 produces an S-led minority government, with V/MP/C occasional coo
 | 4 | No Russian hybrid escalation shifting voter focus to security | SÄPO bulletins | 🟧 M (~0.65) |
 | 5 | MP + V clear the 4 % threshold (so S+V+MP coalition feasible) | Sifo monthly | 🟧 M (~0.55) |
 
-### 30-day manifestation (minimal)
+#### 30-day manifestation (minimal)
 
 In the 30-day window, S2 is pre-manifesting via **counter-motion architecture** rather than vote outcomes. Every government bill in April–May is paired with a systematic S/V/MP/C counter-motion (19 counter-motions tracked in [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md) §Counter-Motion Network). These serve as **alternative-government manifesto documents** for the September campaign. The 30-day indicator is: **Is opposition counter-motion content reported by legacy media as an "alternative government program" or dismissed as procedural?**
 
-### Implications
+#### Implications
 
 - ✅ V/C/MP ECHR-litigation-predicate fully matured; Strasbourg docket H2 2026
 - ✅ Policy legacy preserved where cross-party consensus existed (Ukraine, NATO, KU32 accessibility)
@@ -551,13 +546,13 @@ In the 30-day window, S2 is pre-manifesting via **counter-motion architecture**
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority (post-Sep P = 0.15)
+### 📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority (post-Sep P = 0.15)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 September 2026 produces an S+V+MP majority. KU33 2nd reading **blocked**. Fiscal arithmetic **fully renegotiated** (progressive-tax reforms plausible). Migration trio substantially **revised or repealed** (reception law reopened; inhibition orders repealed). NATO + Ukraine retained as cross-party. Climate reform accelerates (fuel-tax cut reversed).
 
-### Necessary Conditions
+#### Necessary Conditions
 
 | # | Condition | Required Indicator | Probability |
 |---|-----------|--------------------|:------------:|
@@ -566,11 +561,11 @@ September 2026 produces an S+V+MP majority. KU33 2nd reading **blocked**. Fiscal
 | 3 | Coalition rhetorical collapse pre-Sep (L pulls out or KD rhetorical break) | Media events | 🟥 L (~0.25) |
 | 4 | Economic narrative remains decisive (no Russian hybrid or other security event) | Continuous | 🟧 M (~0.60) |
 
-### 30-day manifestation
+#### 30-day manifestation
 
 Minimal direct effect in 30 days. Indirect: **V-block fuel-tax motion (HD024092) and MP-block (HD024098) establish the 2026 campaign's climate-reversal narrative**. If these counter-motions are accepted for committee referral (even if defeated), the narrative architecture is set.
 
-### Implications
+#### Implications
 
 - ✅ Climate reform accelerates; KU33 reversal; full migration-trio redesign
 - ⚠️ Unprecedented rapid policy reversals create regulatory uncertainty
@@ -578,20 +573,20 @@ Minimal direct effect in 30 days. Indirect: **V-block fuel-tax motion (HD024092)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Wildcard W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation (P = 0.22, rising)
+### 📊 Wildcard W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation (P = 0.22, rising)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 A Russian hybrid-warfare event (cyber-attack on Swedish critical infrastructure, airspace incursion, undersea-cable sabotage, election-interference campaign, or kinetic escalation in Baltic region) shifts campaign agenda from cost-of-living to security.
 
-### Trigger Indicators
+#### Trigger Indicators
 
 - SÄPO elevation of threat level (continuous monitoring)
 - Nordic event log (Baltic/Finnish incidents)
 - Undersea-cable incident reports (Baltic)
 - Cybersäkerhetscentrum alert bulletins
 
-### Implications
+#### Implications
 
 | Base scenario | Adjusted P if W1 realised |
 |---------------|:-------------------------:|
@@ -603,19 +598,19 @@ A Russian hybrid-warfare event (cyber-attack on Swedish critical infrastructure,
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Wildcard W2 — ECHR Strike-Down on Inhibition Orders Pre-Sep (P = 0.12)
+### 📊 Wildcard W2 — ECHR Strike-Down on Inhibition Orders Pre-Sep (P = 0.12)
 
-### Description
+#### Description
 
 A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders (`HD01SfU22`) before Sep 2026, finding Article 3 or Article 8 ECHR violation. Government forced to amend mid-campaign.
 
-### Trigger Indicators
+#### Trigger Indicators
 
 - Strasbourg docket monitoring (V parlamentariska kansli)
 - Interim-measures request filings (plausible early 2026-Q3)
 - ECHR press-release calendar
 
-### Implications
+#### Implications
 
 | Base scenario | Adjusted P if W2 realised |
 |---------------|:-------------------------:|
@@ -627,7 +622,7 @@ A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders
 
 ---
 
-## 🔬 ACH Grid — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (30-day resolution only)
+### 🔬 ACH Grid — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (30-day resolution only)
 
 | Evidence | Supports S1 | Supports S2/S3 | Notes |
 |----------|:-----------:|:--------------:|-------|
@@ -644,7 +639,7 @@ A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 90-Day Monitoring Calendar (trigger → scenario-shift mapping)
+### 📅 90-Day Monitoring Calendar (trigger → scenario-shift mapping)
 
 | Date | Event | Scenario-Shift Potential |
 |------|-------|--------------------------|
@@ -663,7 +658,7 @@ A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter
+### 🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -676,7 +671,7 @@ A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work
+### 📎 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work
 
 - [`2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md) — canonical 90-day + post-election scenario baseline (adopted here, extended to 30-day band)
 - [`2026-04-17/week-ahead/synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/week-ahead/synthesis-summary.md) — week-16 forward indicators (now operationalised as 30-day triggers)
@@ -687,8 +682,7 @@ A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-26 (weekly) or on any W1/W2 trigger · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian priors + ACH.
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19T11:33:00Z
 **Article Type**: month-ahead
@@ -696,7 +690,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)
+### Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)
 
 | # | Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | L×I Score | Category | Trigger |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -711,21 +705,21 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Detailed Risk Analysis
+### Detailed Risk Analysis
 
-### R2/R6/R7: Economic Risk Cluster (Combined L×I: High)
+#### R2/R6/R7: Economic Risk Cluster (Combined L×I: High)
 Sweden's GDP growth of 0.82% in 2024 — lagging Denmark (3.48%), Norway (2.10%), Finland (0.42%) — combined with rising unemployment to 8.69% in 2025 creates a fragile economic backdrop for the spring budget season. The government's fiscal stimulus via fuel tax cuts and energy support is expansionary at a time when fiscal consolidation may be more prudent. The Riksbank's assessment of the spring economic proposition will be the key inflection point.
 
 **Forward indicator**: Konjunkturinstitutet economic tendency survey (May) — if confidence falls, amplifies economic risk score.
 **Mitigation**: Government's explicit fiscal framework review (HD03241 — Riksrevisionen report on financial policy framework) provides parliamentary oversight mechanism.
 
-### R5: Climate Coalition Tension
+#### R5: Climate Coalition Tension
 The fuel tax cut (HD03236) explicitly lowers taxes on petrol and diesel — a direct contradiction of L (Liberals) and KD's stated climate positions. Interpellation responses and Alliansen party statements in May will reveal the degree of internal tension. SD's voter base strongly supports lower fuel taxes; this is fundamentally a SD electoral concession within the coalition.
 
 **Forward indicator**: L party conference statements in May; environmental organisations' response.
 **Mitigation**: Simultaneous passage of EV charging tax relief (HD01SkU23) and wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) provides rhetorical balance.
 
-### R8: Social Services Deterioration
+#### R8: Social Services Deterioration
 Women's shelter closures (interpellation HD10438 by Sofia Amloh/S to Minister Nina Larsson/L) signal a systemic underfunding of violence prevention infrastructure. If additional closures are reported during May, this could escalate into a multi-day media event with cross-party condemnation.
 
 **Forward indicator**: Riksorganisationen för kvinnojourer och tjejjourer i Sverige (ROKS) membership survey results.
@@ -733,7 +727,7 @@ Women's shelter closures (interpellation HD10438 by Sofia Amloh/S to Minister Ni
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Heatmap Summary
+### Risk Heatmap Summary
 
 ```
 Impact ↑
@@ -751,13 +745,12 @@ Impact ↑
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 Overall risk confidence: 🟩HIGH — All risks grounded in specific legislative documents and observable economic data. Economic indicators are from World Bank (2024–2025 data). Legislative timeline risks based on committee report dates and known parliamentary procedure.
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19T11:32:00Z
 **Article Type**: month-ahead
@@ -765,7 +758,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Strengths
+### Strengths
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -779,7 +772,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Weaknesses
+### Weaknesses
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -793,7 +786,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Opportunities
+### Opportunities
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -806,7 +799,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Threats
+### Threats
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -818,51 +811,50 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Stakeholder Analysis (8 Mandatory Groups)
+### Stakeholder Analysis (8 Mandatory Groups)
 
-### 1. Citizens [🟩HIGH confidence]
+#### 1. Citizens [🟩HIGH confidence]
 **Benefits**: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) provides immediate household relief — petrol and diesel prices affected directly; parental allowance reform (HD01SfU20) removes bureaucratic burden for parents; housing register (HD01CU28) improves property transparency.
 **Risks**: Unemployment at 8.69% creates economic anxiety; declining housing construction in Stockholm limits affordability; women's shelter closures (HD10438) reduce safety net for vulnerable women.
 **Net assessment**: Mixed — pre-election economic measures provide visible short-term relief while structural employment and housing problems persist.
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L) [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]
+#### 2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L) [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]
 **Benefits**: Massive legislative delivery package demonstrates governing capacity; Ukraine cluster strengthens international credentials; law-and-order narrative via migration/justice bills consolidates core SD voter base.
 **Risks**: Fuel tax cut creates climate credibility gap; unemployment rise undercuts economic management narrative; inter-coalition tensions between KD social policy and SD migration positions possible.
 **Net assessment**: Strong position entering campaign season but vulnerable on economic competence.
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP+C) [🟩HIGH confidence]
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP+C) [🟩HIGH confidence]
 **Benefits**: 19 counter-motions filed create clear policy differentiation for election campaigns; S can position as responsible alternative government; C occupies swing position on multiple bills.
 **Risks**: Opposition lacks votes to block any coalition bill; risk of being seen as obstructionist rather than constructive; V and MP face marginal parliamentary existence risk.
 **Net assessment**: Counter-motions are primarily electoral positioning documents — they will not change outcomes but build manifesto differentiation.
 
-### 4. Business & Industry [🟧MEDIUM confidence]
+#### 4. Business & Industry [🟧MEDIUM confidence]
 **Benefits**: New electricity system laws (HD03240) provide investment certainty; state e-ID reduces administrative burden; data interoperability (HD03244) reduces public sector data friction; paid police training (HD03237) increases security.
 **Risks**: Forestry industry concerns about new regulations (HD03242); shipping industry affected by harbour law (HD03234); construction sector faces ongoing housing demand/supply mismatch.
 **Net assessment**: Net positive from regulatory modernisation and energy security framework.
 
-### 5. Civil Society [🟧MEDIUM confidence]
+#### 5. Civil Society [🟧MEDIUM confidence]
 **Benefits**: National strategy against violence against women (HD03245) represents significant policy commitment; accessibility improvements in fundamental law (HD01KU32) benefit persons with disabilities.
 **Risks**: Women's shelter closures (HD10438) signal funding gaps in violence prevention infrastructure; civil society asylum support organisations affected by new reception law (HD03229).
 **Net assessment**: Concerned — policy commitments not matched by service funding.
 
-### 6. International/EU [🟩HIGH confidence]
+#### 6. International/EU [🟩HIGH confidence]
 **Benefits**: Three Ukraine solidarity bills significantly strengthen Sweden's international standing post-NATO accession; EU accessibility requirements compliance improved (HD01KU32); EU waste legislation compliance improved (HD01MJU19).
 **Risks**: EU wage transparency directive (HD10437) creates compliance pressure; weapons export rules debate (HD024091, HD024096) could affect EU/NATO arms coordination.
 **Net assessment**: Sweden's international posture strengthened substantially by Ukraine legislative cluster.
 
-### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional [🟧MEDIUM confidence]
+#### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional [🟧MEDIUM confidence]
 **Benefits**: Two fundamental law changes being adopted as "vilande" (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) — proper constitutional procedure followed; identity requirements for property registration (HD01CU27) strengthen anti-money-laundering framework.
 **Risks**: Deportation rules (HD03235) face legal scrutiny on proportionality; inhibition order law (HD01SfU22) tested against ECHR standards; freedom of speech protections under scrutiny (HD10429).
 **Net assessment**: Constitutional procedure is sound; specific bills face potential future legal challenge.
 
-### 8. Media/Public Opinion [🟩HIGH confidence]
+#### 8. Media/Public Opinion [🟩HIGH confidence]
 **Benefits**: Fuel tax cut generates positive headline coverage; Ukraine solidarity cluster creates positive international media narrative; police training reform is popular.
 **Risks**: Unemployment at 8.69% is the overriding economic story; women's shelter closures generate negative human interest coverage; migration debate is polarising.
 **Net assessment**: Media environment is contested — government has positive stories but negative economic indicators dominate.
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19T11:34:00Z
 **Article Type**: month-ahead
@@ -870,15 +862,15 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Overall Threat Level: MEDIUM
+### Overall Threat Level: MEDIUM
 
 Sweden's parliamentary system is functioning within normal democratic parameters. The threat landscape is dominated by **political polarisation** around migration policy and **economic vulnerabilities** ahead of the September 2026 election, rather than acute institutional threats.
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Identification
+### Threat Identification
 
-### T1: Democratic Legitimacy Strain on Migration Policy
+#### T1: Democratic Legitimacy Strain on Migration Policy
 **Severity**: 🟠MEDIUM-HIGH
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
@@ -887,7 +879,7 @@ The simultaneous introduction of the new reception law (HD03229), stricter depor
 **Evidence**: HD024079 (S), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C), HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP) — 7 motions against HD03229 and HD03235 alone.
 **Forward indicator**: Administrative court challenges to individual deportation decisions under new rules.
 
-### T2: Constitutional Creep Risk
+#### T2: Constitutional Creep Risk
 **Severity**: 🟡MEDIUM
 **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
@@ -896,7 +888,7 @@ Two bills are being simultaneously adopted as "vilande" fundamental law changes
 **Evidence**: HD01KU33 explicitly exempts seized digital files from being classified as public documents.
 **Forward indicator**: Statement by Swedish Press Photographers' Association or Reporters Without Borders.
 
-### T3: Cybersecurity Legislative Gap
+#### T3: Cybersecurity Legislative Gap
 **Severity**: 🟡MEDIUM
 **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
@@ -905,7 +897,7 @@ The C party motion (HD024093) questioning the cybersecurity centre bill (HD03214
 **Evidence**: HD024093 — Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) and Mikael Larsson (C) motion for further analysis.
 **Forward indicator**: NCSC operational assessment report.
 
-### T4: Economic Security Threat from Low Growth
+#### T4: Economic Security Threat from Low Growth
 **Severity**: 🟠MEDIUM-HIGH
 **Confidence**: 🟦VERY HIGH
 
@@ -916,7 +908,7 @@ Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth in 2024, rising unemployment (8.69% in 2025), and infl
 
 ---
 
-## Severity Ranking
+### Severity Ranking
 
 1. T1: Migration legitimacy strain — **MEDIUM-HIGH** (🟧)
 2. T4: Economic security — **MEDIUM-HIGH** (🟧)
@@ -925,13 +917,12 @@ Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth in 2024, rising unemployment (8.69% in 2025), and infl
 
 ---
 
-## Mitigation Landscape
+### Mitigation Landscape
 
 The Riksdag's constitutional committee processes are functioning; government has parliamentary majority to pass contested legislation; economic policy framework review (HD03241) provides transparency. Threat level is unlikely to escalate to HIGH in the 30-day window absent major external shock.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -944,15 +935,15 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)
+### 🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)
 
 > A reference-grade month-ahead outlook must **benchmark against ≥ 5 jurisdictions** so that Swedish legislative developments are interpreted in context, not in isolation. Every cluster in the 30-day window (fiscal, migration, constitutional, Ukraine accountability, energy) is also a live political battleground in neighbouring jurisdictions — and the comparative lens is the most reliable way to identify where Sweden *innovates*, where it *follows*, and where it *diverges*.
 
 ---
 
-## 💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context
+### 💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context
 
-### Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)
+#### Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)
 
 | Country | GDP Growth 2024 | GDP Growth 2023 | Unemployment 2025 | Inflation 2024 | Notes |
 |---------|:---------------:|:---------------:|:-----------------:|:--------------:|-------|
@@ -967,7 +958,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Key insight** `[VERY HIGH]`: Sweden's 0.82 % growth in 2024 — vs Denmark's 3.48 % — is the **single largest empirical vulnerability** in the Tidö government's economic-stewardship narrative. Finland tracks similarly poorly. The Spring Fiscal Trilogy (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236) is a **stimulus response to a structural underperformance gap**, not a normal cyclical fiscal calibration.
 
-### Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)
+#### Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)
 
 | Country | 2026 Fiscal Stance | Carbon-pricing discipline? | Comparable instrument to HD03236 fuel-tax cut? |
 |---------|--------------------|:--------------------------:|:----------------------------------------------:|
@@ -981,7 +972,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Insight** `[HIGH]`: Among Nordic peers, Denmark and Finland retain **full carbon-pricing discipline** while supporting cost-of-living relief through other instruments (targeted income support, energy-poverty subsidies). Norway has partially adjusted carbon fees — closer to Sweden but not cutting fuel tax directly. **Sweden's 82-öre fuel-tax cut is a Nordic outlier** and will be scrutinised against these peer approaches in the September 2026 campaign.
 
-### Budget-Process Comparison
+#### Budget-Process Comparison
 
 | Country | Pre-election budget sprint? | 2026 session volume |
 |---------|:---------------------------:|--------------------|
@@ -995,9 +986,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33) in Nordic + EU Context
+### 📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33) in Nordic + EU Context
 
-### Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)
+#### Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)
 
 | Country | RSF Rank 2025 | Applicable framework |
 |---------|:-------------:|----------------------|
@@ -1026,9 +1017,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🚪 C3 — Migration Legislative Blitz in EU + Nordic Context
+### 🚪 C3 — Migration Legislative Blitz in EU + Nordic Context
 
-### Migration-Policy Posture (2026)
+#### Migration-Policy Posture (2026)
 
 | Country | 2026 migration-policy direction | ECHR sensitivity |
 |---------|-------------------------------|:----------------:|
@@ -1043,7 +1034,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Insight** `[HIGH]`: Sweden is **part of a broader European tightening wave** (NL, DE, FI, UK). However, the **simultaneous ECHR-litigation-predicate architecture** prepared by V + C + MP is distinctive — only NL has equivalent coordinated civil-society + parliamentary litigation posture. Swedish migration bills therefore face the **most prepared domestic legal-challenge environment** in the Nordic region.
 
-### Reception-Law Comparison (HD03229 specifics)
+#### Reception-Law Comparison (HD03229 specifics)
 
 | Country | Reception standard | Relation to EU Reception Directive (2013/33) |
 |---------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|
@@ -1057,9 +1048,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ C4 — Ukraine Accountability Architecture (HD03231 + HD03232) in International Context
+### 🏛️ C4 — Ukraine Accountability Architecture (HD03231 + HD03232) in International Context
 
-### State-of-Ukraine-Tribunal Participation (as of 2026-04-15)
+#### State-of-Ukraine-Tribunal Participation (as of 2026-04-15)
 
 | State | Formal accession status | Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression |
 |-------|------------------------|:----------------------------------------:|
@@ -1078,7 +1069,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Insight** `[VERY HIGH]`: Sweden joins the **strongest Euro-Atlantic coalition of accountability states** — 20+ European + Commonwealth jurisdictions. Swedish membership adds **Nordic credibility** to the tribunal architecture. US non-participation is the single largest operational question for tribunal effectiveness. Without US cooperation, the tribunal's asset-tracing and extradition authority is constrained.
 
-### Reparations Commission (HD03232) Architecture
+#### Reparations Commission (HD03232) Architecture
 
 | Country | Commission membership | Reparation funding source |
 |---------|----------------------|---------------------------|
@@ -1093,9 +1084,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ C5 — Energy Reform (HD03240 Electricity System + HD03239 Wind-Power Revenue Sharing)
+### ⚡ C5 — Energy Reform (HD03240 Electricity System + HD03239 Wind-Power Revenue Sharing)
 
-### Nordic Electricity-Market Reform Posture (2026)
+#### Nordic Electricity-Market Reform Posture (2026)
 
 | Country | 2026 electricity reform direction | Grid-capacity priority |
 |---------|-----------------------------------|:----------------------:|
@@ -1108,7 +1099,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Insight** `[HIGH]`: Sweden's HD03240 is **aligned with Nordic neighbours** on grid modernisation. Convergent on capacity-mechanism design; divergent on carbon-price interaction (Sweden's fuel-tax cut creates a cross-cluster tension with HD03240's low-carbon goals).
 
-### Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing Models (HD03239)
+#### Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing Models (HD03239)
 
 | Country | Municipal revenue-sharing model |
 |---------|---------------------------------|
@@ -1122,9 +1113,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ C6 — NATO eFP Deployment (HD01UFöU3) in Alliance Context
+### 🛡️ C6 — NATO eFP Deployment (HD01UFöU3) in Alliance Context
 
-### NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026)
+#### NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026)
 
 | Contributor | Deployment posture to Finland | Scale |
 |-------------|------------------------------|:-----:|
@@ -1140,7 +1131,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Summary: Sweden's Position in 5 Cluster-Benchmarks
+### 📊 Summary: Sweden's Position in 5 Cluster-Benchmarks
 
 | Cluster | Sweden's Posture | Vs Nordic Peers | Vs EU Peers |
 |---------|-----------------|-----------------|-------------|
@@ -1154,19 +1145,19 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🔍 Where Sweden Diverges — Narrative Implications
+### 🔍 Where Sweden Diverges — Narrative Implications
 
 1. **Fuel-tax cut = Nordic outlier** ⇒ climate-credibility cost; media attack surface from MP + V; L + KD internal strain
 2. **ECHR-litigation-predicate architecture on migration = uniquely coordinated** ⇒ post-enactment legal exposure higher than DK (which has opt-outs) or FI
 3. **KU33 interpretive ambiguity = idiosyncratic Swedish risk** ⇒ Lagrådet Q2 2026 yttrande is the single most consequential upcoming legal document
 
-## 🔭 Where Sweden Innovates
+### 🔭 Where Sweden Innovates
 
 1. **KU32 accessibility in grundlag** — first Nordic jurisdiction to embed
 2. **HD03232 reparations commission accession timing** — Sweden in founding cohort
 3. **HD03239 wind-power revenue-sharing** — clearest Nordic-convergent municipal-incentive design
 
-## 🔁 Where Sweden Follows
+### 🔁 Where Sweden Follows
 
 1. **Migration tightening** — follows NL, FI, DE, UK wave
 2. **Electricity-system reform** — catches up with Nordic neighbours
@@ -1174,7 +1165,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Reference
+### 📎 Cross-Reference
 
 - [`2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md) — canonical Week-16 benchmark baseline (extended here to 30-day forward)
 - [`2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md) — KU32/KU33 constitutional-cluster deep-dive
@@ -1185,8 +1176,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-26 (weekly checkpoint) or on material jurisdiction-shift · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 8.
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1198,7 +1188,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary
+### 🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary
 
 | Tier | Definition | Documents This Window |
 |------|------------|----------------------|
@@ -1211,7 +1201,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document
+### 🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document
 
 > Where CIA = **C**onfidentiality (information protection / institutional secrecy), **I**ntegrity (rule-of-law durability + transparency), **A**vailability (citizen access to rights / services). Scored ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦.
 
@@ -1246,7 +1236,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Per-Document Classification Matrix (Domain + Controversy + Urgency + EU impact)
+### 🏛️ Per-Document Classification Matrix (Domain + Controversy + Urgency + EU impact)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Policy Domain | Political Valence | Ideological Driver | Controversy | Urgency | Priority | EU Impact |
 |--------|-------|--------------|------------------|-------------------|:-----------:|:-------:|:--------:|:---------:|
@@ -1277,7 +1267,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (visual)
+### 🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (visual)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1297,7 +1287,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 Policy Domain Distribution
+### 🌐 Policy Domain Distribution
 
 | Domain | Count | Example dok_ids | Election-2026 Salience |
 |--------|:-----:|-----------------|:----------------------:|
@@ -1316,7 +1306,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Governing Coalition Policy Vector
+### 🏛️ Governing Coalition Policy Vector
 
 The April–May 2026 legislative cluster represents a **rightward acceleration** in coalition policy as elections approach, but with three domain-specific exceptions:
 
@@ -1340,7 +1330,7 @@ The April–May 2026 legislative cluster represents a **rightward acceleration**
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ Conflict Lines
+### ⚖️ Conflict Lines
 
 **Coalition vs. Opposition**: All fiscal-cut + migration + HD01KU33 measures have clear left-right fault lines. The 19 counter-motions filed by S/V/MP/C are the structural evidence.
 
@@ -1352,7 +1342,7 @@ The April–May 2026 legislative cluster represents a **rightward acceleration**
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 EU / International Impact Summary
+### 🌍 EU / International Impact Summary
 
 | EU / International Regime | Affected dok_ids | Risk type |
 |---------------------------|------------------|-----------|
@@ -1377,7 +1367,7 @@ The April–May 2026 legislative cluster represents a **rightward acceleration**
 
 ---
 
-## 🕰️ Historical Classification Analogy
+### 🕰️ Historical Classification Analogy
 
 This legislative sprint is analogous to the **Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal expansion** (anti-austerity during financial crisis) in its use of supplementary-budget mechanisms — but with three key differences:
 
@@ -1387,7 +1377,7 @@ This legislative sprint is analogous to the **Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 References
+### 📎 References
 
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md) — composite scoring methodology and coverage-completeness gate
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md) — L×I risk-scored per cluster with 30/60/90-day triggers
@@ -1400,57 +1390,56 @@ This legislative sprint is analogous to the **Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-26 · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md` v3.0 + `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 5.
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19T11:37:00Z
 **Article Type**: month-ahead
 
 ---
 
-## Thematic Cross-Reference Network
+### Thematic Cross-Reference Network
 
-### Budget & Fiscal Policy Cluster
+#### Budget & Fiscal Policy Cluster
 - **HD03100** (Spring Economic Proposition) ↔ **HD0399** (Supplementary Budget) ↔ **HD03236** (Extra Budget: Fuel Tax)
 - All three go through FiU (Finance Committee)
 - Counter-motions: HD024082 (S), HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP) opposing fuel tax cut
 - Interpellations: HD10433 (tax reform overview), HD10427 (PostNord/state ownership)
 - Economic framework: HD03241 (Riksrevisionen fiscal framework report), HD03101 (State Annual Report 2025), HD0398 (Tax expenditure report)
 
-### Ukraine & International Security Cluster
+#### Ukraine & International Security Cluster
 - **HD03231** (Ukraine Tribunal) ↔ **HD03232** (Ukraine Compensation Commission) ↔ **HD03220** (NATO Finland)
 - HD03220/HD01UFöU3: UFöU committee report already issued — most advanced in legislative pipeline
 - HD03231/HD03232: Both handled by UU (Foreign Affairs Committee)
 - Cross-party support expected; these bills are not controversial across party lines
 - International context: UN/ICC developments on Ukraine accountability
 
-### Migration & Justice Cluster
+#### Migration & Justice Cluster
 - **HD03229** (Reception Law) ↔ **HD03235** (Deportation Rules) ↔ **HD01SfU22** (Inhibition Orders)
 - All handled by SfU (Social Insurance/Migration Committee)
 - Plus: HD03246 (Young Offenders), HD03237 (Paid Police Training), HD03233 (Anti-fraud telecoms)
 - Counter-motion network: V (HD024090), MP (HD024097), C (HD024095) on deportation; S (HD024080), MP (HD024087), C (HD024089) on reception law
 - Interpellation links: HD10429 (freedom of speech / prop 133), HD10420 (police authority), HD10422 (integration/labour)
 
-### Energy & Climate Cluster
+#### Energy & Climate Cluster
 - **HD03240** (Electricity Laws) ↔ **HD03239** (Wind Power) ↔ **HD01SkU23** (EV Charging Tax Relief)
 - HD03238 (Environmental Permitting Agency) linked to siting of energy infrastructure
 - Counter-motion: HD024098, HD024092 (V, MP opposing fuel tax = climate conflict with HD03236)
 - Constitutional link: HD01MJU19 (Waste Legislation) also in MJU
 
-### Digital Governance Cluster
+#### Digital Governance Cluster
 - **HD03244** (Data Interoperability) ↔ **HD01TU21** (State e-ID)
 - HD03214-related: HD024093 (C motion on cybersecurity centre)
 - All linked to Sweden's EU digital single market obligations
 - Intersects with HD01KU33 (public documents/digital files)
 
-### Housing & Property Cluster
+#### Housing & Property Cluster
 - **HD01CU28** (National Housing Register) ↔ **HD01CU27** (Identity for Property Registration)
 - Interpellation link: HD10434 (Stockholm housing construction decline)
 - Anti-money-laundering dimension: identity requirements connect to financial crime prevention
 
 ---
 
-## Key Decision Dependencies
+### Key Decision Dependencies
 
 ```
 HD03236 (Fuel Tax Vote)
@@ -1472,7 +1461,7 @@ HD03229 + HD03235 (Migration Legislation)
 
 ---
 
-## Document Count by Committee
+### Document Count by Committee
 
 | Committee | Propositions | Betänkanden | Motions | Interpellations |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1492,8 +1481,7 @@ HD03229 + HD03235 (Migration Legislation)
 **Observation**: FiU and SfU carry the heaviest legislative load in this period, reflecting the government's dual priority of economic management and migration control.
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1506,7 +1494,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Purpose
+### 🎯 Purpose
 
 Per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 7, every reference-grade analysis package must include an explicit **methodology self-audit** documenting:
 
@@ -1521,7 +1509,7 @@ This file makes the analysis **legible to readers, auditors, and methodology own
 
 ---
 
-## 📋 Methodology Application Matrix
+### 📋 Methodology Application Matrix
 
 | Methodology | Doctrine Source | Applied to Files | Application Quality |
 |-------------|-----------------|------------------|:-------------------:|
@@ -1545,11 +1533,11 @@ This file makes the analysis **legible to readers, auditors, and methodology own
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory for Aggregation Workflows)
+### 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory for Aggregation Workflows)
 
 > **Per the "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol added to `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md`**, every forward indicator issued in the last 5 days of sibling daily runs MUST be either **carried forward** into this month-ahead package or **explicitly retired** with a one-line reason.
 
-### Forward Indicators Ingested from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18
+#### Forward Indicators Ingested from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18
 
 | Source | Watchpoint | Disposition in this run |
 |--------|-----------|------------------------|
@@ -1577,7 +1565,7 @@ This file makes the analysis **legible to readers, auditors, and methodology own
 
 ---
 
-## 🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots
+### 🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots
 
 The following dimensions of this month-ahead package carry **structural uncertainty** that should be tracked explicitly:
 
@@ -1596,7 +1584,7 @@ The following dimensions of this month-ahead package carry **structural uncertai
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Known Limitations
+### ⚠️ Known Limitations
 
 1. **30-day horizon truncation**: Some upstream watchpoints (e.g., W10 RSF 2027 publication, W11 Lantmäteriet Q3 procurement) fall outside this window and cannot be followed here. They are preserved for annual/quarterly outlooks.
 
@@ -1612,7 +1600,7 @@ The following dimensions of this month-ahead package carry **structural uncertai
 
 ---
 
-## 🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence
+### 🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence
 
 Per the `copilot-instructions.md` **AI FIRST** principle (minimum 2 complete iterations), this package was iterated from a 9-artifact base to a 14-artifact reference-grade package. Specific improvements:
 
@@ -1630,25 +1618,25 @@ Single-pass output (the original 9-artefact base) was **shallow** on upstream co
 
 ---
 
-## 💡 Recommendations for Doctrine Codification
+### 💡 Recommendations for Doctrine Codification
 
-### R1. `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` — Add "14 REQUIRED Artifacts for Aggregation Workflows"
+#### R1. `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` — Add "14 REQUIRED Artifacts for Aggregation Workflows"
 
 > The 9-artefact gate applies to all workflows. **Aggregation workflows** (month-ahead, week-ahead, evening-analysis, weekly-review, monthly-review) should additionally produce 5 Tier-C reference-grade artefacts: `README.md`, `executive-brief.md`, `scenario-analysis.md`, `comparative-international.md`, `methodology-reflection.md`. This brings aggregation workflows to the 14-artefact reference-grade bar established by [`2026-04-18/weekly-review/`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/).
 
-### R2. `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` — Add "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol
+#### R2. `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` — Add "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol
 
 > Aggregation workflows MUST read every `synthesis-summary.md` and `significance-scoring.md` from the last **N days** of sibling daily runs (N = 7 for week-ahead, 14 for month-ahead, 14–30 for monthly-review). Every forward indicator in those upstream files MUST be either **carried forward** or **explicitly retired** in the aggregation package's `methodology-reflection.md` §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation. No silent drops.
 
-### R3. `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` — Promote Upstream Continuity to Rule 9
+#### R3. `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` — Promote Upstream Continuity to Rule 9
 
 > Add **Rule 9: Upstream Continuity Contract** to the canonical rule set. Any aggregation work whose horizon overlaps a prior run's forward indicators MUST reconcile them in a dedicated section. This is the **continuity-of-intelligence discipline** that makes the monitor a coherent ongoing intelligence product rather than a series of disconnected snapshots.
 
-### R4. `news-month-ahead.md` — Update Workflow Prompt
+#### R4. `news-month-ahead.md` — Update Workflow Prompt
 
 > The month-ahead workflow prompt (and peer aggregation workflow prompts) should explicitly require the 14-artefact production and the upstream watchpoint reconciliation before article generation. See PR for proposed diff.
 
-### R5. Template Updates
+#### R5. Template Updates
 
 > Add template stubs to `analysis/templates/`:
 > - `scenario-analysis-template.md` (3 base + wildcards + ACH grid)
@@ -1659,7 +1647,7 @@ Single-pass output (the original 9-artefact base) was **shallow** on upstream co
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 References
+### 📎 References
 
 - `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied; Rule 9 proposed here)
 - `analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md` v3.0
@@ -1673,13 +1661,12 @@ Single-pass output (the original 9-artefact base) was **shallow** on upstream co
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: on any material methodology-doctrine update · **Methodology**: self-audit per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 7.
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19 11:20 UTC · **Pipeline mode**: aggregation (live MCP + upstream synthesis)
 **Produced By**: `news-month-ahead` agentic workflow, consolidated by News Journalist agent
 
-## Ingestion mode
+### Ingestion mode
 
 This month-ahead package is an **aggregation product**: it does not re-download raw documents via the
 `download-parliamentary-data` script (which still reports `0 / 0` in the header block below because the
@@ -1695,7 +1682,7 @@ performed by the AI agent while authoring the 14 artefacts:
 See [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md) §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation" for the
 audit of **16 forward indicators carried forward from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 (0 silent drops)**.
 
-## Live MCP evidence base (cited across the 14 artefacts)
+### Live MCP evidence base (cited across the 14 artefacts)
 
 | Category | Unique `dok_id`s cited | Examples |
 |----------|------------------------|----------|
@@ -1708,7 +1695,7 @@ audit of **16 forward indicators carried forward from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18
 Total unique `dok_id` citations across the 14-artefact package: **≥ 62**. Complete list is machine-extractable via
 `grep -rhoE 'HD[0-9A-Za-zÖöÄäÅå]+' analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/*.md | sort -u`.
 
-## Upstream sibling runs ingested
+### Upstream sibling runs ingested
 
 | Source | Scope | Reconciled indicators |
 |--------|-------|-----------------------|
@@ -1720,14 +1707,14 @@ Total unique `dok_id` citations across the 14-artefact package: **≥ 62**. Comp
 | [`2026-04-16/evening-analysis/`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-16/evening-analysis/) | JuU15 145–142 vote | Vote-discipline signature baseline |
 | [`2026-04-15/evening-analysis/`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-15/evening-analysis/) | Evening analysis | Pre-vote committee positioning |
 
-## External public-data sources
+### External public-data sources
 
 | Source | File | Scope |
 |--------|------|-------|
 | World Bank Open Data API | [`economic-data.json`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/economic-data.json) | Nordic GDP (NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG), unemployment (SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS), inflation (FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG) 2021–2025 |
 | `data.riksdagen.se` calendar feeds | Live queries | Europe Day (9 May), FöU/EUN committee schedules, Open-House weekend (14–15 May) |
 
-## Raw document download (data-only helper — not invoked for this aggregation run)
+### Raw document download (data-only helper — not invoked for this aggregation run)
 
 The fields below are from the `download-parliamentary-data` helper. They are `0` because the aggregation
 workflow does not invoke that helper. This is **not** a data-quality issue — all cited evidence is sourced
@@ -1748,10 +1735,28 @@ through the live MCP channel above and cross-referenced to the upstream sibling
 > performed by the AI agent following `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` and using
 > templates from `analysis/templates/`.
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 
 - All `HD*` documents cited are sourced from the official `riksdag-regering-mcp` API.
 - Upstream synthesis follows the 14-day lookback policy for `month-ahead` per
   `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` §"RECENT DAILY KNOWLEDGE-BASE SYNTHESIS".
 - Upstream watchpoint reconciliation is auditable: **16 indicators in → 16 indicators reconciled →
   0 silent drops** (see `methodology-reflection.md` §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation").
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/article.md
index 2aad9a42b2..167179061a 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-19
 subfolder: monthly-review
 slug: 2026-04-19-monthly-review
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.856Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.651Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts — 30-day retrospective</em>
@@ -42,13 +41,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 > **April 2026 was the single most electorally consequential month of the 2025/26 Riksdag session.** The Tidö-koalitionen (M–SD–KD–L) under PM **Ulf Kristersson (M)** and Finance Minister **Elisabeth Svantesson (M)** concentrated its identity-defining legislation into a four-week pre-election sprint: the **Spring Fiscal Trilogy** (Vårproposition `HD03100` + Vårändringsbudget `HD0399` + Extra ändringsbudget `HD03236` — fuel-tax cut 82 öre/litre + el/gas household relief, ≈ SEK 60 B net stimulus); a **criminal-justice bloc** (`HD03218` double penalties for criminal networks, `HD03217` extended civil-servant liability, `HD03246` stricter youth-offender rules, `HD03245` national men's-violence strategy, `HD03237` paid police education); a **constitutional pair** (`HD01KU32` media-accessibility + `HD01KU33` search-and-seizure of digital evidence — both declared *vilande*, requiring confirmation by the post-September-2026 Riksdag and thereby making the general election a **de-facto referendum on constitutional change**); a **NATO operational first** (`HD03220` Sweden's 1,200-troop contribution to Finnish NATO eFP — first Article-5-era force deployment to allied territory); an **environmental-deregulation package** (`HD03238` new permit authority, `HD03242` active forestry, `HD03239` wind-power municipal veto, `HD03240` new electricity-system law); and **international-justice accession** (`HD03231` Special Tribunal on Crime of Aggression against Ukraine + `HD03232` International Compensation Commission). Against **0.82 % GDP growth 2024** (vs DK 3.48 %, NO 2.10 %, FI 0.42 %; World Bank) and **8.7 % unemployment 2025**, the month crystallises a **dual-positioning strategy**: fiscal stimulus + toughness on crime/border for swing voters, constitutional + environmental deregulation for the coalition's right flank — with the **women's-shelter closure interpellation `HD10438`** opening the central opposition attack vector. `[VERY HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | Decision | Evidence Locus | Action Window |
 |----------|---------------|--------------:|
@@ -58,7 +57,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
+### 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
 
 1. **The lead story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy** (`HD03100` + `HD0399` + `HD03236`). ≈ SEK 60 B net stimulus; 82 öre/litre fuel-tax cut; el/gas relief. Sweden's 0.82 % 2024 growth trails Nordics by **2–3 percentage points** — the trilogy is simultaneously counter-cyclical economics and pre-election household-relief politics. **Q3-2026 macro data** (the release just before the September vote) becomes the campaign's fiscal-credibility verdict. `[VERY HIGH]`
 2. **The constitutional story is the KU32/KU33 pair** (`HD01KU32` media accessibility + `HD01KU33` digital-evidence search/seizure). **Grundlag amendments require two identical Riksdag votes separated by a general election** — the September-2026 campaign thereby becomes a de-facto referendum on narrowing *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* (1766). Interpretive scope of "*formellt tillförd bevisning*" in KU33 is the strategic centre of gravity. `[HIGH]`
@@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 5 ministers / party leaders with dok_id citations)
+### 🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 5 ministers / party leaders with dok_id citations)
 
 | Actor | Role | dok_id Evidence | Why They Matter Now |
 |-------|------|-----------------|--------------------|
@@ -94,7 +93,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🗓 Forward Vote Calendar (Next 90 Days — with Triggers)
+### 🗓 Forward Vote Calendar (Next 90 Days — with Triggers)
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger | Impact |
 |---------------|---------|--------|
@@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from `risk-assessment.md`)
+### ⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from `risk-assessment.md`)
 
 | Rank | Risk | Score | Status | Mitigation |
 |:----:|------|:-----:|:------:|-----------|
@@ -127,7 +126,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Top-5 Opportunities
+### 🎯 Top-5 Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Source | Window |
 |---|-------------|--------|:------:|
@@ -139,7 +138,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
+### ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -154,7 +153,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/README.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md) · [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md) · [Classification](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md) · [SWOT](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md) · [Cross-References](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md) · [Data Manifest](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md)
 
@@ -163,8 +162,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-05-19 (monthly cadence) or event-driven on Lagrådet KU33 yttrande · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.0 · **Upstream Continuity Contract**: `.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Article Type**: monthly-review  
@@ -174,13 +172,13 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 
 April 2026 marks one of the most legislatively intensive months of the 2025/26 parliamentary session. The Tidö-koalitionen government (M–SD–KD–L) tabled its **spring budget package** — including an extra change budget cutting fuel taxes and introducing energy price support — against a backdrop of a Swedish economy growing at a modest 0.82% in 2024, far below Denmark's 3.5%. Simultaneously, a sweeping criminal justice overhaul emerged as the session's defining domestic theme, with three major bills targeting criminal networks, youth offenders, and civil servant accountability. Environmental governance was substantially restructured through a new environmental permit authority and active forestry deregulation. The month's activity provides a clear electoral positioning signal ahead of the September 2026 Riksdag election.
 
 ---
 
-## Key Legislative Developments (Chronological)
+### Key Legislative Developments (Chronological)
 
 ```mermaid
 timeline
@@ -214,7 +212,7 @@ timeline
 
 ---
 
-## Monthly Legislative Statistics
+### Monthly Legislative Statistics
 
 | Metric | Count | Trend vs. Prior Month |
 |--------|-------|----------------------|
@@ -228,7 +226,7 @@ timeline
 
 ---
 
-## Dominant Policy Themes
+### Dominant Policy Themes
 
 ```mermaid
 mindmap
@@ -271,7 +269,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Party Activity Analysis (Last 30 Days)
+### Party Activity Analysis (Last 30 Days)
 
 | Party | Role | Notable Actions | Assessment |
 |-------|------|----------------|------------|
@@ -286,7 +284,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Economic Context
+### Economic Context
 
 Sweden's economy grew at **0.82%** in 2024 — recovering from a -0.20% contraction in 2023 but significantly trailing Denmark (**3.5%**), Norway (**2.1%**), and the EU average. Unemployment hit **8.7%** in 2025, among the highest in the Nordic region. Inflation fell dramatically to **2.84%** in 2024 from a crisis peak of 8.55% in 2023. GDP per capita reached **USD 57,117** in 2024.
 
@@ -294,28 +292,28 @@ The government's extra change budget (HD03236) cutting fuel taxes and providing
 
 ---
 
-## Significance Tiers
+### Significance Tiers
 
-### Tier 1 — National Significance
+#### Tier 1 — National Significance
 - **HD03100** Spring Proposition 2026 — frames entire government economic strategy
 - **HD03236** Extra budget — fuel taxes + energy support (immediate household impact)
 - **HD03218** Double penalties for criminal networks (major criminal justice reform)
 - **HD03220** NATO Finland contribution (national security commitment)
 
-### Tier 2 — Major Policy
+#### Tier 2 — Major Policy
 - **HD03238** New environmental permit authority (institutional restructuring)
 - **HD03245** National violence against women strategy
 - **HD03217** Extended civil servant criminal liability
 - **HD03246** Stricter youth offender rules
 
-### Tier 3 — Procedural/Technical
+#### Tier 3 — Procedural/Technical
 - **HD01CU28** National condominium register
 - **HD01CU27** Property identity requirements
 - **HD01KU32/33** Constitutional changes (vilande — require post-election confirmation)
 
 ---
 
-## Election 2026 Implications
+### Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact**: 🟩 HIGH — Budget season with fuel tax cuts is clearly electorally motivated. The September 2026 election means every major legislative action from April through September carries campaign weight.
 
@@ -328,15 +326,14 @@ The government's extra change budget (HD03236) cutting fuel taxes and providing
 **Policy Legacy**: 🟦 VERY HIGH confidence that this spring session shapes the campaign agenda: the government has staked its identity on crime reduction and economic relief.
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Article Type**: monthly-review
 
 ---
 
-## Scoring Methodology
+### Scoring Methodology
 
 Significance scored on three dimensions:
 - **Legislative Impact** (0-10): Constitutional/structural vs. procedural/technical
@@ -347,7 +344,7 @@ Final score = weighted average (0.4 × Legislative + 0.3 × Public + 0.3 × Elec
 
 ---
 
-## Top 15 Documents by Significance
+### Top 15 Documents by Significance
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -359,7 +356,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Detailed Scores
+### Detailed Scores
 
 | dok_id | Legislative | Public | Electoral | Final | Tier |
 |--------|------------|--------|-----------|-------|------|
@@ -381,7 +378,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Monthly Significance Index
+### Monthly Significance Index
 
 **This month's significance level**: 🟩 HIGH (score: 8.1/10)
 
@@ -403,8 +400,7 @@ xychart-beta
 - April 2026: HIGH (8.1) — spring peak ✓
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Article Type**: monthly-review  
@@ -412,7 +408,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Stakeholder Map
+### Stakeholder Map
 
 ```mermaid
 mindmap
@@ -449,7 +445,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 1: Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L)
+### Perspective 1: Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L)
 
 **Stance**: Satisfied with April productivity  
 **Key interests**: Electoral positioning, crime reduction, fiscal prudence with relief  
@@ -465,7 +461,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)
+### Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)
 
 **Stance**: Actively confrontational but constructive on security  
 **Key interests**: Welfare state integrity, workers' rights, regional equity  
@@ -477,7 +473,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (SD)
+### Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (SD)
 
 **Stance**: Delivering on core programme through coalition  
 **Key interests**: Crime reduction, immigration restriction, national security  
@@ -489,7 +485,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 4: Centerpartiet (C)
+### Perspective 4: Centerpartiet (C)
 
 **Stance**: Selective constructive opposition  
 **Key interests**: Rural business, entrepreneurship, personal liberty, NATO  
@@ -500,7 +496,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 5: Miljöpartiet (MP)
+### Perspective 5: Miljöpartiet (MP)
 
 **Stance**: Principled opposition on environment and climate  
 **Key interests**: Green transition, social justice, EU alignment  
@@ -511,7 +507,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 6: Business Community / Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv)
+### Perspective 6: Business Community / Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv)
 
 **Stance**: Generally supportive of April package  
 **Key interests**: Regulatory simplification, digital infrastructure, labour market flexibility  
@@ -522,7 +518,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 7: Women's Rights and Civil Society Organisations
+### Perspective 7: Women's Rights and Civil Society Organisations
 
 **Stance**: Alarmed — between legislative progress and implementation failures  
 **Key interests**: Protection funding, wage equality, violence prevention  
@@ -534,7 +530,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Perspective 8: Swedish Local Government / SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)
+### Perspective 8: Swedish Local Government / SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)
 
 **Stance**: Concerned about unfunded mandates and service withdrawals  
 **Key interests**: Municipal finance, service delivery standards, regional development  
@@ -544,8 +540,7 @@ mindmap
 **Risk**: Municipal election results in 2026 may see urban-rural divide exploited by all parties
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -558,7 +553,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Framework Overview
+### Framework Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -579,57 +574,57 @@ Probabilities sum to 100 % (three base scenarios) + wildcard overlays; aligned t
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario A — Tidö-koalitionen Re-elected (Probability: **42 %** · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)
+### Scenario A — Tidö-koalitionen Re-elected (Probability: **42 %** · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)
 
-### Trigger conditions (signals that raise this scenario's probability)
+#### Trigger conditions (signals that raise this scenario's probability)
 - Opinion polls retain M+SD+KD+L ≥ 175 seats by August 2026
 - Q3-2026 macro release shows GDP growth ≥ 1.5 % (vs 0.82 % 2024)
 - Unemployment trending below 8.5 % (from 8.7 % 2025 baseline)
 - No major SÄPO-acknowledged Russian hybrid incident
 - Fuel-tax cut `HD03236` reaches households before August 2026
 
-### 30-day policy trajectory
+#### 30-day policy trajectory
 - `HD03100` + `HD0399` + `HD03236` clear chamber (2026-04-22 Extra budget vote passes bloc-vote 175–174)
 - `HD03218` double-penalty law passes first reading with expected SD-kingmaker discipline
 - `HD10438` women's-shelter interpellation answered without emergency supplemental
 
-### 90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)
+#### 90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)
 - Lagrådet KU33 yttrande **silent** on narrow interpretation → government proceeds unchanged
 - `HD03242` active forestry: EU Commission issues letter-of-formal-notice; government defends on subsidiarity
 - `HD03220` NATO eFP Bn-task-group deploys to Finland (July 2026) without incident
 - `HD03231` / `HD03232` Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission: chamber approval with ≥ 300 MPs
 
-### Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)
+#### Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)
 - KU32/KU33 **CONFIRMED** in second reading by new Riksdag (bloc vote ≥ 175)
 - Tidöavtalet 2.0 negotiations open — expanded deportation + migration-tightening mandate
 - `HD03218` expanded to additional offence categories by end-2026
 
-### Confidence indicators to monitor
+#### Confidence indicators to monitor
 - **Raise probability to 50 %+** if: Q2 inflation < 2.5 % AND unemployment < 8.5 % AND no SÄPO hybrid incident
 - **Lower probability to 35 %** if: shelter crisis unresolved AND V+MP+S cross-party motion wins C swing vote
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario B — S-led Government (Probability: **33 %** · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)
+### Scenario B — S-led Government (Probability: **33 %** · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)
 
-### Trigger conditions
+#### Trigger conditions
 - S regains ≥ 30 % polling (from ≈ 26 % April 2026 baseline)
 - Women's-shelter crisis (`HD10438`) dominates August campaign coverage
 - Q3-2026 macro shows GDP < 1 %, unemployment > 9 %
 - C refuses to enter Tidö-koalitionen after the election
 - V delivers parliamentary support tolerance (confidence-and-supply, not formal coalition)
 
-### 30-day policy trajectory
+#### 30-day policy trajectory
 - S + V + MP + C coordinated motion on women's-shelter emergency funding tests coalition discipline
 - S files counter-motion to `HD03236` reframing fuel-tax cut as regressive household-transfer
 - Magdalena Andersson leverages HD10438 as campaign-defining attack vector
 
-### 90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)
+#### 90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)
 - S tables comprehensive counter-budget for 2027 (pre-election)
 - Forestry `HD03242` passes but V + MP mobilisation becomes organising framework for the left bloc
 - `HD03217` civil-servant liability becomes union/LO mobilisation vector
 
-### Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)
+#### Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)
 - **KU32/KU33 FAIL** second reading — grundlag change lapses (political cost: zero; status quo ante)
 - `HD03242` active forestry **REVERSED** — species-inventory compromise (Finland model)
 - Women's-shelter emergency funding passed in first post-election budget
@@ -638,25 +633,25 @@ Probabilities sum to 100 % (three base scenarios) + wildcard overlays; aligned t
 - Criminal-justice bloc (`HD03218` + `HD03246`) **maintained** — cross-party support (rehabilitation supplements added)
 - NATO commitments (`HD03220`) **maintained** — bipartisan foreign-policy consensus since 2024
 
-### Confidence indicators to monitor
+#### Confidence indicators to monitor
 - **Raise probability to 40 %+** if: shelter crisis × fuel-tax regressivity attack-line breaks through by July
 - **Lower probability to 25 %** if: Q3-2026 macro outperforms + no new hybrid incident
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario C — Hung Parliament / Coalition Negotiations (Probability: **22 %** · Confidence 🟥 LOW)
+### Scenario C — Hung Parliament / Coalition Negotiations (Probability: **22 %** · Confidence 🟥 LOW)
 
-### Trigger conditions
+#### Trigger conditions
 - Neither Tidö-bloc nor S+V+MP+C coalition clears 175 seats
 - SD strong enough (≥ 22 %) to demand formal government role; C refuses
 - L drops below 4 % threshold (coalition-arithmetic shock)
 - Novus + SIFO average within ± 3 points of both blocs in the final week
 
-### 30-day policy trajectory (during election campaign)
+#### 30-day policy trajectory (during election campaign)
 - All major legislative files proceed — campaign-trail coverage intensifies, chamber behaviour unchanged
 - Parties position for post-election negotiating leverage
 
-### Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026–Dec 2026)
+#### Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026–Dec 2026)
 - Budget-negotiation stalemate consumes Q4 2026 — statsminister-omröstning may require 3–5 attempts
 - `HD03218` criminal-network law already enacted pre-election — **MAINTAINED** (cross-party consensus)
 - `HD03242` forestry + `HD03239` wind veto **FROZEN** pending coalition agreement
@@ -664,13 +659,13 @@ Probabilities sum to 100 % (three base scenarios) + wildcard overlays; aligned t
 - Women's-shelter emergency funding passed as **coalition-formation concession** (likely)
 - `HD03231` / `HD03232` Ukraine tribunal accession **MAINTAINED** — cross-party
 
-### Confidence indicators to monitor
+#### Confidence indicators to monitor
 - **Raise probability to 30 %+** if: L drops below 4 % in August polling AND C publicly rules out both blocs
 - **Lower probability to 15 %** if: one bloc consolidates > 47 % polling by early September
 
 ---
 
-## Wildcard W-1 — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Escalation (Probability: **8 %** · Impact: HIGH)
+### Wildcard W-1 — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Escalation (Probability: **8 %** · Impact: HIGH)
 
 **Trigger**: SÄPO-confirmed major cyber/hybrid incident attributable to Russia, timed to:
 1. The 2026-Q3 Bn-task-group deployment to Finland, OR
@@ -686,7 +681,7 @@ Probabilities sum to 100 % (three base scenarios) + wildcard overlays; aligned t
 
 ---
 
-## Wildcard W-2 — Early Election / No-Confidence Vote (Probability: **5 %** · Impact: HIGH)
+### Wildcard W-2 — Early Election / No-Confidence Vote (Probability: **5 %** · Impact: HIGH)
 
 **Trigger**: Coalition partner (most likely L given press-freedom / KU33 tensions) withdraws support on a specific grundlag paragraph → cabinet-confidence test.
 
@@ -699,7 +694,7 @@ Probabilities sum to 100 % (three base scenarios) + wildcard overlays; aligned t
 
 ---
 
-## ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid
+### ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid
 
 Legend: ✅ consistent · ⚠️ ambiguous · ❌ inconsistent
 
@@ -722,7 +717,7 @@ Legend: ✅ consistent · ⚠️ ambiguous · ❌ inconsistent
 
 ---
 
-## Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)
+### Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)
 
 | Date | Trigger Event | Scenario Shift Rules |
 |------|--------------|---------------------|
@@ -743,7 +738,7 @@ Legend: ✅ consistent · ⚠️ ambiguous · ❌ inconsistent
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-Reference to Upstream
+### Cross-Reference to Upstream
 
 - Probability bands **aligned** to [`analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md) base of 45 % / 35 % / 20 %, adjusted to **42 % / 33 % / 22 %** on the monthly scope reflecting: (a) visible shelter-crisis attack-vector maturation (H-B +1), (b) arithmetic widening for hung-parliament (H-C +2), (c) corresponding H-A narrowing (-3). Every departure justified per `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` §"Probability alignment".
 - Wildcards **inherited** from [`analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md) with monthly-scope probability adjustment (W-1: 6 % → 8 %; W-2: 4 % → 5 %) as eFP-deployment window approaches.
@@ -753,8 +748,7 @@ Legend: ✅ consistent · ⚠️ ambiguous · ❌ inconsistent
 **Confidence Assessment**: Base-scenario probabilities — 🟧 MEDIUM · Wildcards — 🟥 LOW (inherent tail-risk uncertainty) · Monitoring triggers — 🟩 HIGH (calendar anchored to concrete procedural events).
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Article Type**: monthly-review  
@@ -762,7 +756,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Heat Map
+### Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -774,7 +768,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Register
+### Risk Register
 
 | Risk ID | Risk Description | Likelihood | Impact | Score | Mitigation |
 |---------|-----------------|-----------|--------|-------|-----------|
@@ -791,26 +785,26 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Top Risk Analysis
+### Top Risk Analysis
 
-### R-02: Economic Growth Stall
+#### R-02: Economic Growth Stall
 Sweden's GDP growth at 0.82% in 2024 recovering from -0.20% contraction is fragile. Unemployment at 8.7% in 2025 exceeds the Nordic average. The extra budget fuel tax cut (HD03236) is a short-term stimulus that does not address structural competitiveness gaps. If the Riksbank holds rates elevated into Q3 2026, housing investment and consumer spending may remain suppressed through the election.
 
 **Probability**: 45% | **Impact if realised**: GDP below 0.5% in 2025 triggers fiscal stimulus debate
 
-### R-03: Women's Shelter Crisis
+#### R-03: Women's Shelter Crisis
 The interpellation on women's shelter closures (HD10438) from S signals a politically charged welfare issue. Dozens of shelters across Sweden have closed due to municipal funding cuts. The national violence strategy (HD03245) passed in April but is a framework without immediate ring-fenced funding. Social media amplification potential is high.
 
 **Probability**: 70% | **Impact if realised**: Major opposition campaign issue from May–September 2026
 
-### R-04: EU Environmental Infringement
+#### R-04: EU Environmental Infringement
 Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) removing restrictions on clear-cutting and species protection in productive forests risks EU Taxonomy non-compliance and potential infringement proceedings under the EU Biodiversity Strategy. Sweden's forestry industry generates approximately 3% of GDP — conflict between economic and environmental interests.
 
 **Probability**: 35% | **Impact if realised**: EU formal notice, international reputation damage
 
 ---
 
-## Political Stability Assessment
+### Political Stability Assessment
 
 ```mermaid
 gauge
@@ -824,7 +818,7 @@ gauge
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)
+### Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)
 
 | Assessment Area | Confidence |
 |----------------|-----------|
@@ -836,8 +830,7 @@ gauge
 | Post-election scenarios | 🟥 LOW |
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Article Type**: monthly-review  
@@ -845,7 +838,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## SWOT Matrix Overview
+### SWOT Matrix Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -868,122 +861,122 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## STRENGTHS
+### STRENGTHS
 
-### 1. Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L Perspective)
+#### 1. Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L Perspective)
 - Delivered a comprehensive spring budget package (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236) on schedule
 - Criminal justice reform (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217) demonstrates legislative discipline across coalition partners
 - NATO Finland contribution (HD03220) passed with broad cross-party support, reinforcing security credibility
 - New environmental agency (HD03238) signals institutional modernisation while controlling environmental costs
 - **Evidence**: 272 propositions in 2025/26 session; HD03236 passed FiU by April 14
 
-### 2. Opposition Parties (S, V, MP Perspective)
+#### 2. Opposition Parties (S, V, MP Perspective)
 - Social Democrats produced 25+ interpellations in 30 days demonstrating active parliamentary scrutiny
 - Women's shelter closures (HD10438) and wage transparency (HD10437) create high-visibility attack vectors
 - MP successfully branded extra budget (HD03236) as anti-climate, mobilising green base
 - **Evidence**: HD024098 (MP motion against fuel tax cut), HD10437–HD10438 (S interpellations)
 
-### 3. Democratic Institutions
+#### 3. Democratic Institutions
 - Constitutional amendments properly processed as "vilande" (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) — system integrity maintained
 - Committee system processed 50 betankanden in the spring surge without backlog
 - Property rights strengthened: condominium register (HD01CU28) and ID requirements (HD01CU27) improve housing market transparency
 
-### 4. Economic Policy Framework
+#### 4. Economic Policy Framework
 - Inflation reduced from 8.5% (2023) to 2.84% (2024) — monetary policy normalising
 - GDP per capita at USD 57,117 — solid base despite slow growth
 - Energy price support mechanism (HD03236) provides household relief amid elevated energy costs
 
-### 5. Digital Governance
+#### 5. Digital Governance
 - State e-ID bill (TU21) passed — major milestone for digital public services
 - Data interoperability for public sector (HD03244) modernises government infrastructure
 - Both initiatives align with EU Digital Single Market requirements
 
 ---
 
-## WEAKNESSES
+### WEAKNESSES
 
-### 1. Economic Performance (Citizen/Household Perspective)
+#### 1. Economic Performance (Citizen/Household Perspective)
 - GDP growth at 0.82% (2024) severely lags Denmark (3.5%), Norway (2.1%), and EU average
 - Unemployment at 8.7% (2025) — highest in five years, disproportionately affecting youth
 - Fuel tax cut in extra budget is fiscal stimulus, not structural reform
 - **Evidence**: World Bank indicators SWE 2024 vs. DNK 2024
 
-### 2. Gender Policy (Women's Rights Advocates, Civil Society)
+#### 2. Gender Policy (Women's Rights Advocates, Civil Society)
 - Women's shelter closure wave (HD10438 interpellation) reveals funding gap between national violence strategy (HD03245) and local implementation
 - Wage gap persisting despite EU directive pressure (HD10437) — enforcement mechanism weak
 - State strategic violence prevention strategy passed legislatively but opposition questions resource allocation
 
-### 3. Environmental Governance (Environmental Organisations, Green Economy Stakeholders)
+#### 3. Environmental Governance (Environmental Organisations, Green Economy Stakeholders)
 - Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) risks EU Taxonomy and biodiversity commitments
 - Wind power municipal reform (HD03239) introduces local veto risk, potentially slowing green transition
 - New environmental permit agency (HD03238) raises efficiency questions — whether streamlining helps or weakens environmental protection
 
-### 4. Regional Disparities (Local Government, Rural Communities)
+#### 4. Regional Disparities (Local Government, Rural Communities)
 - Closure of state service offices in peripheral areas (HD11718 — southeastern Skåne question)
 - Municipal harbour reform (TU19) centralises port governance, raising concerns for smaller coastal municipalities
 - Police education reform (HD03237) — whether paying police training will improve rural recruitment unclear
 
-### 5. Constitutional Process (Legal Scholars, Opposition)
+#### 5. Constitutional Process (Legal Scholars, Opposition)
 - Two constitutional changes (HD01KU32, KU33) approved as "vilande" — means post-2026 election parliament must confirm, creating policy uncertainty
 - Digital records privacy in criminal investigations (HD01KU33) raises press freedom concerns
 - Accessibility requirements for media (HD01KU32) welcomed by disability rights groups
 
 ---
 
-## OPPORTUNITIES
+### OPPORTUNITIES
 
-### 1. Electoral Positioning (Government Coalition)
+#### 1. Electoral Positioning (Government Coalition)
 - Crime package (HD03218 double penalties, HD03246 youth, HD03217 civil servants) directly addresses top voter priority
 - Fuel tax cut (HD03236) delivers tangible pre-election relief to households
 - NATO contribution (HD03220) demonstrates security responsibility ahead of September vote
 - Window to consolidate government record before election campaign
 
-### 2. Green Industrial Strategy (Business Sector, EU Context)
+#### 2. Green Industrial Strategy (Business Sector, EU Context)
 - New electricity system law (HD03240) enables renewable energy expansion
 - Environmental permit agency reform (HD03238) could attract clean-tech investment if streamlined effectively
 - Swedish wind energy potential if municipality reform (HD03239) strikes right balance
 - Green Taxonomy-aligned investments could boost sluggish GDP
 
-### 3. Nordic Economic Integration (Business, Nordic Perspective)
+#### 3. Nordic Economic Integration (Business, Nordic Perspective)
 - Sweden's GDP per capita (USD 57,117) remains competitive despite slow growth
 - Housing market reforms (HD01CU28, HD01CU27) improve property rights transparency — foreign investment attractiveness
 - Digital infrastructure (e-ID, data interoperability) positions Sweden for digital economy leadership
 
-### 4. Ukraine/International Leadership (Diplomatic, EU Perspective)
+#### 4. Ukraine/International Leadership (Diplomatic, EU Perspective)
 - Special tribunal accession (HD03231) builds international rule-of-law credentials
 - NATO Finland contribution strengthens Nordic defence cooperation
 - Arms export control modernisation (HD03114) balances security and democratic accountability
 
-### 5. Social Cohesion Reform (Academic, Think-Tank Perspective)
+#### 5. Social Cohesion Reform (Academic, Think-Tank Perspective)
 - Guardianship reform (HD01CU22) strengthens legal protections for vulnerable individuals
 - New violence prevention strategy (HD03245) aligns with EU gender equality commitments
 - Wage transparency directive implementation creates structural market correction opportunity
 
 ---
 
-## THREATS
+### THREATS
 
-### 1. Electoral Volatility (Political Risk Analysts)
+#### 1. Electoral Volatility (Political Risk Analysts)
 - Five months to September 2026 election — legislative agenda increasingly campaign-driven
 - SD maintains legislative influence without formal government membership — creates accountability opacity
 - Opposition unified on cost-of-living and welfare issues; government fiscal conservatism may face backlash
 
-### 2. Economic Deterioration Risk (Economists, Fiscal Analysts)
+#### 2. Economic Deterioration Risk (Economists, Fiscal Analysts)
 - Sweden's GDP growth (0.82%) cannot sustain high unemployment (8.7%) without fiscal stimulus
 - Extra budget fuel tax cuts reduce revenue without structural employment improvements
 - Risk of "stagflation light" if energy prices spike again post-support programme
 
-### 3. Environmental/Climate Commitments (EU, International Institutions)
+#### 3. Environmental/Climate Commitments (EU, International Institutions)
 - Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) risks EU infringement proceedings
 - Wind power municipal veto (HD03239) may undermine Sweden's EU renewable energy targets
 - Climate credibility gap threatens Nordic leadership position
 
-### 4. Security Escalation (Defence Analysts, NATO Context)
+#### 4. Security Escalation (Defence Analysts, NATO Context)
 - NATO forward presence in Finland (HD03220) — cost trajectory unclear
 - Civil preparedness legislation in pipeline — significant budgetary implications
 - Any Baltic security deterioration could overwhelm planned defence spending (spring budget)
 
-### 5. Social Fragmentation (Social Policy Researchers, Media)
+#### 5. Social Fragmentation (Social Policy Researchers, Media)
 - Women's shelter closures (HD10438) signal civil society funding squeeze
 - Youth unemployment elevated — stricter penalties for young offenders (HD03246) without parallel rehabilitation investment risks recidivism
 - Tax demands on trafficking victims (HD11719) — administrative injustice case highlighting systemic issues
@@ -991,7 +984,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Stakeholder Impact Matrix
+### Stakeholder Impact Matrix
 
 | Stakeholder Group | Primary Concern | Outlook | Evidence |
 |------------------|----------------|---------|----------|
@@ -1007,14 +1000,13 @@ quadrantChart
 | Academic/Think-tanks | Constitutional changes | Monitoring | HD01KU32/33 |
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 > **📋 Template reference:** `analysis/templates/threat-analysis.md` v3.3 (2026-06-01). Political Threat Taxonomy · Attack Tree · Kill Chain · Diamond Model — **NOT** STRIDE.
 
 ---
 
-## 📋 Threat Analysis Context
+### 📋 Threat Analysis Context
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1027,11 +1019,11 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment
+### 🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment
 
 > **Severity Scale:** 1=Negligible · 2=Minor · 3=Moderate · 4=Major · 5=Severe. All 6 Political Threat Taxonomy categories assessed below — STRIDE categories are **not** used for political threat analysis.
 
-### Political Threat Landscape
+#### Political Threat Landscape
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1060,7 +1052,7 @@ graph LR
     class NI1,TR1 minor
 ```
 
-### Threat Severity Table (all 6 categories covered)
+#### Threat Severity Table (all 6 categories covered)
 
 | # | Taxonomy Category | Threat (1-sentence) | Sev | Confidence | Evidence (dok_id) |
 |---|-------------------|---------------------|:---:|:----------:|-------------------|
@@ -1076,7 +1068,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat (AC-01: KU33 press-freedom narrowing)
+### 🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat (AC-01: KU33 press-freedom narrowing)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1109,7 +1101,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## ⛓️ Section 3: Kill Chain Assessment (Top Threat AC-01)
+### ⛓️ Section 3: Kill Chain Assessment (Top Threat AC-01)
 
 | Stage | Definition | Current State (2026-04-19) | Confidence |
 |-------|-----------|----------------------------|:----------:|
@@ -1125,7 +1117,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — Primary Threat Actor (PB-01 · Tidö coalition legislative concentration)
+### 💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — Primary Threat Actor (PB-01 · Tidö coalition legislative concentration)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1149,7 +1141,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 👤 Section 5: Threat Actor Profile — ICO (Intent-Capability-Opportunity)
+### 👤 Section 5: Threat Actor Profile — ICO (Intent-Capability-Opportunity)
 
 | Actor | Intent | Capability | Opportunity | Composite |
 |-------|:------:|:----------:|:-----------:|:---------:|
@@ -1163,33 +1155,33 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🚨 Section 6: Identified Threats — Consolidated Register
+### 🚨 Section 6: Identified Threats — Consolidated Register
 
-### TH-01 · Pre-election Legislative Concentration (PB-01)
+#### TH-01 · Pre-election Legislative Concentration (PB-01)
 - **Taxonomy**: Power Balance · **Severity**: 4 / Major · **Confidence**: `[HIGH]`
 - **Evidence (dok_id)**: HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241, HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03242, HD03239
 - **Analysis**: 4 budgets + crime trilogy + environmental deregulation cluster delivered in 30 days represents the legislative apex of the spring session. Velocity is legitimate but compresses Lagrådet review windows and opposition-motion preparation cycles. V + MP + S collectively filed 19 counter-motions but could not reach the 175-MP threshold for procedural blocking.
 - **Mitigation stance**: Lagrådet should receive full allocated review time on all grundlag-adjacent items; opposition should front-load second-reading challenges in new Riksdag.
 
-### TH-02 · KU33 Press-Freedom Narrowing — *vilande* (AC-01)
+#### TH-02 · KU33 Press-Freedom Narrowing — *vilande* (AC-01)
 - **Taxonomy**: Accountability · **Severity**: 4 / Major · **Confidence**: `[HIGH]`
 - **Evidence (dok_id)**: HD01KU33, HD01KU32
 - **Analysis**: Narrow interpretation of *formellt tillförd bevisning* in TF 2:1 — if confirmed in second reading — sets case-law precedent durable for ≥ 8 years. The *vilande* design effectively turns Sep-2026 into a constitutional referendum. See §2 Attack Tree and §3 Kill Chain above.
 - **Mitigation stance**: TU + Pressens Opinionsnämnd + Journalistförbundet co-ordinated remissvar; Lagrådet engagement; post-election statutory-clarity amendments.
 
-### TH-03 · Hybrid-Threat Exposure Post-eFP Deployment (PB-02)
+#### TH-03 · Hybrid-Threat Exposure Post-eFP Deployment (PB-02)
 - **Taxonomy**: Power Balance (external) · **Severity**: 3 / Moderate · **Confidence**: `[MEDIUM]` (SÄPO/MSB source gap — not in monthly MCP sync)
 - **Evidence (dok_id)**: HD03220, HD03231
 - **Analysis**: Battalion-task-group deployment to Finland Q3 2026 + leadership on Ukraine Aggression Tribunal (HD03231) elevate Sweden's public profile. External hybrid-threat actors (Russia per documented posture) may respond with information-ops, cyber probing, or physical-infrastructure harassment — leading indicators track through SÄPO/MSB bulletins, not parliamentary documents.
 - **Mitigation stance**: Nordic-Baltic intel-sharing; civil-society resilience; MSB heightened public-info posture through deployment window.
 
-### TH-04 · Civil-Servant Chilling Effect (LI-01)
+#### TH-04 · Civil-Servant Chilling Effect (LI-01)
 - **Taxonomy**: Legislative Integrity · **Severity**: 3 / Moderate · **Confidence**: `[HIGH]`
 - **Evidence (dok_id)**: HD03217, HD03218, HD03246
 - **Analysis**: Extended criminal liability for civil servants (HD03217) paired with a general punitive legislative turn (HD03218/HD03246) risks risk-aversion in agency decision-making — a measurable effect visible in FOI-response latencies and internal-memo culture. V + MP raised rule-of-law objections in committee.
 - **Mitigation stance**: Parallel expansion of administrative appeal mechanisms; JK (Justitiekanslern) monitoring.
 
-### TH-05 · Environmental-Governance Compliance Friction (LI-02 derivative)
+#### TH-05 · Environmental-Governance Compliance Friction (LI-02 derivative)
 - **Taxonomy**: Legislative Integrity · **Severity**: 3 / Moderate · **Confidence**: `[HIGH]`
 - **Evidence (dok_id)**: HD03242, HD03239, HD03238, HD03240
 - **Analysis**: Active-forestry rules (HD03242) and wind-power municipal veto (HD03239) risk EU Commission infringement procedures on EU Biodiversity 2030 commitments. New environmental-permit authority (HD03238) may be unstaffed before transition (Naturvårdsverket transition risk).
@@ -1197,7 +1189,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Section 7: Severity Distribution
+### 📊 Section 7: Severity Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Threat Distribution by Severity (Political Threat Taxonomy)
@@ -1212,7 +1204,7 @@ pie title Threat Distribution by Severity (Political Threat Taxonomy)
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Section 8: Forward Indicators — MCP-Detectable Escalation Signals
+### 🔭 Section 8: Forward Indicators — MCP-Detectable Escalation Signals
 
 | # | Indicator | Data Source | Trigger Threshold | Horizon |
 |---|-----------|-------------|-------------------|:-------:|
@@ -1227,7 +1219,7 @@ Cross-reference: `scenario-analysis.md` §Monitoring-Trigger Calendar, `executiv
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconciliation
+### 🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconciliation
 
 Threats carried forward from sibling runs in the 30-day lookback window:
 
@@ -1239,8 +1231,7 @@ Threats carried forward from sibling runs in the 30-day lookback window:
 Full reconciliation: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md) §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1253,7 +1244,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## Cluster Overview: Sweden's April 2026 Innovates / Follows / Diverges Scorecard
+### Cluster Overview: Sweden's April 2026 Innovates / Follows / Diverges Scorecard
 
 | Policy Cluster | Flagship Docs | SE Innovates | SE Follows | SE Diverges |
 |---------------|---------------|:------------:|:----------:|:-----------:|
@@ -1272,7 +1263,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Nordic Economic Baseline
+### 1. Nordic Economic Baseline
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -1298,7 +1289,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster
+### 2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster
 
 **Sweden**: `HD03218` mandatory double-penalty enhancement for crimes with gang-network connection; `HD03246` stricter youth-offender rules; `HD03217` extended criminal liability for civil servants acting outside authority.
 
@@ -1314,7 +1305,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Constitutional Press-Freedom Cluster (KU32 + KU33 *vilande*)
+### 3. Constitutional Press-Freedom Cluster (KU32 + KU33 *vilande*)
 
 **Sweden**: `HD01KU32` media-accessibility grundlag change; `HD01KU33` search-and-seizure of digital evidence narrowing "allmän handling" scope.
 
@@ -1331,7 +1322,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Environmental Deregulation Cluster & EU Friction
+### 4. Environmental Deregulation Cluster & EU Friction
 
 **Sweden**: `HD03238` new environmental permit authority · `HD03242` active forestry · `HD03239` wind-power municipal veto · `HD03240` new electricity-system law.
 
@@ -1348,11 +1339,11 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Geopolitical / NATO Cluster
+### 5. Geopolitical / NATO Cluster
 
 **Sweden**: `HD03220` 1,200 troops to Finland under enhanced Forward Presence (first post-accession operational contribution); `HD03231` + `HD03232` Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission.
 
-### NATO operational integration benchmark
+#### NATO operational integration benchmark
 
 | Framework Nation | Battalion in Baltics since | Lead Nation For | Notes |
 |-----------------|:-------------------------:|-----------------|-------|
@@ -1364,7 +1355,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 **SE posture**: Sweden **FOLLOWS** the UK/DE/CA eFP model — contributing a framework-nation-style presence to Finland. No lead-nation role yet; expected 2027+ review cycle.
 
-### International-justice norm entrepreneurship
+#### International-justice norm entrepreneurship
 
 | Instrument | SE Position | EU Position | US Position | Russia Position |
 |-----------|:-----------:|:-----------:|:-----------:|:--------------:|
@@ -1377,11 +1368,11 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Gender / Equality Cluster
+### 6. Gender / Equality Cluster
 
 **Sweden**: `HD03245` national strategy against men's violence; `HD10437` EU Wage Transparency Directive interpellation; `HD10438` women's-shelter-closure interpellation.
 
-### EU Wage Transparency Directive 2023/970 transposition race (deadline **2026-06-07**)
+#### EU Wage Transparency Directive 2023/970 transposition race (deadline **2026-06-07**)
 
 | Jurisdiction | Status April 2026 | Expected Completion |
 |-------------|------------------|:------------------:|
@@ -1395,7 +1386,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Democratic-Resilience Benchmark (V-Dem + RSF + Freedom House)
+### 7. Democratic-Resilience Benchmark (V-Dem + RSF + Freedom House)
 
 | Metric | 🇸🇪 SE 2025 | 🇳🇴 NO 2025 | 🇩🇰 DK 2025 | 🇫🇮 FI 2025 | Δ vs 2020 |
 |-------|:---------:|:---------:|:---------:|:---------:|:--------:|
@@ -1408,7 +1399,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Summary — Sweden's International Positioning in April 2026
+### Summary — Sweden's International Positioning in April 2026
 
 | Axis | Posture | Implication |
 |------|:-------:|-------------|
@@ -1426,7 +1417,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-Reference to Upstream
+### Cross-Reference to Upstream
 
 - Nordic baseline table **aligned** to [`analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md) with the monthly-scope extension to include DE, NL, and EU institutions as required by `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` Tier-C contract (≥ 5 jurisdictions).
 - Wage-transparency benchmarking **updated** to reflect DK completion (Q1 2026) from last weekly-review snapshot.
@@ -1434,15 +1425,14 @@ xychart-beta
 **Classification**: Public · **Next review**: 2026-05-19 (monthly cadence) · **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.0 · `SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` §"WORLD BANK ECONOMIC CONTEXT INTEGRATION"
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Article Type**: monthly-review
 
 ---
 
-## 🔒 ISMS CIA-Triad Classification (Riksdagsmonitor Package)
+### 🔒 ISMS CIA-Triad Classification (Riksdagsmonitor Package)
 
 > **Scope**: This classification governs the **monthly-review intelligence package itself** — the 14 analysis artefacts, the article, and their handling. It is **not** a classification of Swedish government documents (which are classified per *Offentlighets- och sekretesslagen* by the respective authorities).
 
@@ -1452,7 +1442,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **Integrity** | 🟠 **HIGH** | Analysis informs political-accountability reporting and editorial decisions; factual errors (vote-count, dok_id, minister attribution) would propagate to 14 translated articles and cause reputational + informational harm. | `methodology-reflection.md` §Uncertainty Hot-Spots |
 | **Availability** | 🟡 **MEDIUM** | Articles are published daily; a 24-hour outage degrades but does not destroy journalistic value (retrospectives remain retrievable). No real-time operational dependency. | GitHub Pages SLA + dual-deploy (GH Pages + S3) |
 
-### Compliance Framework Mapping
+#### Compliance Framework Mapping
 
 | Framework | Applicable Controls | Status |
 |-----------|---------------------|--------|
@@ -1463,7 +1453,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **CIS Controls v8.1** | CIS 3.1 data-management process · CIS 3.2 data-inventory (dok_id manifest) · CIS 14.9 documentation of data processing | ✅ Covered |
 | **Riksdagsmonitor ISMS policies** | `AI_Policy.md`, `Secure_Development_Policy.md`, `CLASSIFICATION.md`, `Information_Security_Policy.md` (Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC) | ✅ Covered |
 
-### Retention & Handling
+#### Retention & Handling
 
 - **Retention**: Permanent public archive in git history + GitHub Pages. `documents/` raw JSON retained indefinitely for provenance audit.
 - **Sharing**: No restrictions. All artefacts suitable for external distribution, syndication, and academic citation.
@@ -1472,7 +1462,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Document Classification by Policy Domain
+### Document Classification by Policy Domain
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Policy Domain Distribution (April 2026)
@@ -1490,7 +1480,7 @@ pie title Policy Domain Distribution (April 2026)
 
 ---
 
-## Classification Matrix
+### Classification Matrix
 
 | dok_id | Title (EN) | Domain | Type | Significance | Electoral Relevance |
 |--------|-----------|--------|------|-------------|---------------------|
@@ -1516,38 +1506,37 @@ pie title Policy Domain Distribution (April 2026)
 
 ---
 
-## Thematic Clusters
+### Thematic Clusters
 
-### Cluster 1: Pre-Election Crime Package (Very High Electoral Salience)
+#### Cluster 1: Pre-Election Crime Package (Very High Electoral Salience)
 Documents: HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03237
 - Narrative: SD-driven agenda delivered through coalition legislation
 - Opposition stance: S/V abstain or oppose, C partially supportive
 
-### Cluster 2: Spring Budget Package (Very High Electoral Salience)
+#### Cluster 2: Spring Budget Package (Very High Electoral Salience)
 Documents: HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241, HD03243
 - Narrative: Responsible budget + household relief
 - Opposition stance: MP opposes fuel cuts; S demands structural investment
 
-### Cluster 3: Environmental Reform Cluster (High EU/International Relevance)
+#### Cluster 3: Environmental Reform Cluster (High EU/International Relevance)
 Documents: HD03238, HD03239, HD03240, HD03242, MJU19
 - Narrative: Streamlined regulation for green economy growth
 - Opposition stance: V/MP strongly oppose deregulation; C mixed
 
-### Cluster 4: Social Protection Gap (High Public Attention)
+#### Cluster 4: Social Protection Gap (High Public Attention)
 Documents: HD10438, HD10437, HD03245, HD11719
 - Narrative: Gap between legislative intent and implementation funding
 - Opportunity for S to campaign on welfare state restoration
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Article Type**: monthly-review
 
 ---
 
-## Document Relationship Graph
+### Document Relationship Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1606,7 +1595,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-Reference Table
+### Cross-Reference Table
 
 | Primary dok_id | Related dok_id | Relationship | Significance |
 |---------------|----------------|-------------|-------------|
@@ -1622,7 +1611,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Sibling Article Type Connections
+### Sibling Article Type Connections
 
 | This Article | Sibling Type | Connection |
 |-------------|-------------|-----------|
@@ -1632,7 +1621,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Legislative Pipeline Dependencies
+### Legislative Pipeline Dependencies
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1645,8 +1634,7 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1659,7 +1647,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Methodology Application Matrix
+### 1. Methodology Application Matrix
 
 | Rule | Applied? | Evidence |
 |------|:--------:|---------|
@@ -1675,7 +1663,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 2. 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis)
+### 2. 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis)
 
 **Lookback scope**: 30 days of sibling daily runs (2026-03-20 → 2026-04-19) + `weekly-review/2026-04-18` + `month-ahead/2026-04-19` + prior monthly baseline (`2026-03-30`).
 
@@ -1705,8 +1693,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 ---
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-19 15:25 UTC
 **Data Sources**: get_propositioner, get_motioner, get_betankanden, search_voteringar, search_anforanden, get_fragor, get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
@@ -1721,7 +1708,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 > `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` and using templates
 > from `analysis/templates/`.
 
-## Document Counts by Type
+### Document Counts by Type
 
 - **propositions**: 200 documents
 - **motions**: 200 documents
@@ -1731,7 +1718,25 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **questions**: 200 documents
 - **interpellations**: 200 documents
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 
 All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-17 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/article.md
index e8b9a43b69..3e06e71e05 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-19
 subfolder: realtime-1219
 slug: 2026-04-19-realtime-1219
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.861Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.656Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
@@ -40,13 +39,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 **Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) on 2026-04-17 advanced a second *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* (TF) amendment in the same riksmöte — betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — narrowing offentlighetsprincipen by removing digital materials seized during husrannsakan from the definition of *allmän handling* until material is "*formellt tillförd bevisning*." First reading is scheduled for 2026-04-22. Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on the narrowing — the amendment cannot take effect before January 2027.** On the same 24-hour window, PM Ulf Kristersson and FM Maria Malmer Stenergard tabled Sweden's accession to the **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine (HD03231)** — the first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg — and the **Convention on the International Compensation Commission for Ukraine (HD03232)**, whose €260bn frozen-asset framework creates the financial accountability arm. **The coordinated royal visit of H.M. King Carl Gustaf + FM Malmer Stenergard to Kyiv on 2026-04-17 — one day after both Ukraine propositions were tabled — elevates the package to a national-commitment signal that transcends partisan politics.** The cluster reveals a paradox — Sweden narrowing domestic transparency while advancing international accountability — explicitly flagged as the opposition-exploitable campaign theme for September 2026. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | Decision | Evidence Locus | Action Window |
 |----------|---------------|--------------:|
@@ -56,7 +55,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
+### 📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds
 
 1. **The #1 finding is the KU33 grundlag amendment.** Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan until *formellt tillförd bevisning*. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the **strategic centre of gravity** — whether it is read strictly (narrow carve-out) or discretionarily (broad chilling effect) decides whether this is a limited reform or a systemic press-freedom regression. `[HIGH]`
 2. **Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) + compensation commission (HD03232) are co-prominent.** Global news-value 9.0; no direct Swedish fiscal burden for reparations (funded from Russian frozen assets); administrative contribution ≈ SEK 50-200m/yr; cross-party consensus near-universal (≈ 349 MPs). `[HIGH]`
@@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 9 ministers / party leaders / institutional actors)
+### 🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 9 ministers / party leaders / institutional actors)
 
 | Actor | Role | Why They Matter Now | Primary dok_id |
 |-------|------|--------------------|:--------------:|
@@ -89,7 +88,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar — What to Watch
+### 🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar — What to Watch
 
 | Date / Window | Trigger | Impact | Monitoring Source |
 |---------------|---------|--------|-------------------|
@@ -104,7 +103,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ Top-5 Risks (detail in [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md))
+### ⚖️ Top-5 Risks (detail in [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md))
 
 | Rank | Risk | L × I | Score | Trend |
 |:---:|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|
@@ -116,7 +115,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
+### ⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Notes |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -131,7 +130,7 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-Links
+### 📎 Cross-Links
 
 [README](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/README.md) · [Synthesis](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md) · [Significance](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md) · [SWOT](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md) · [Risk](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md) · [Threat](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md) · [Stakeholders](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md) · [Scenarios](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md) · [Comparative](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md) · [Cross-References](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md) · [Classification](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md) · [Methodology Reflection](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md) · [Manifest](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md)
 
@@ -142,8 +141,7 @@ Per-document: [HD01KU33 (LEAD, L3)](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-26 · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 + DIW v1.0
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **SYN-ID**: SYN-20260419-1219
 **Date**: 2026-04-19
@@ -152,7 +150,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 **Confidence**: HIGH on lead selection · MEDIUM on post-election outcomes
 **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 + DIW v1.0
 
-## Intelligence Dashboard
+### Intelligence Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -169,7 +167,7 @@ graph LR
     style E fill:#00aa44,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Top Findings
+### Top Findings
 
 | # | Finding | dok_id | Significance | Confidence |
 |---|---------|--------|-------------|-----------|
@@ -178,7 +176,7 @@ graph LR
 | 3 | **Second grundlag amendment (KU32)** in same riksmöte — accessibility requirements for media; establishes pattern of constitutional modification as routine legislative tool | HD01KU32 | DIW 7.98 | HIGH |
 | 4 | **National housing rights register approved** (CU28) — Riksdag to approve national bostadsrättsregister modernizing mortgage market; part of broader anti-financial-crime package. Tracked as context; DIW 5.93 is below the ≥7.0 article-section threshold so not featured in the breaking-news articles (per article-coverage gate). | HD01CU28 | DIW 5.93 | HIGH |
 
-## Lead Story Decision
+### Lead Story Decision
 
 **PRIMARY LEAD**: KU33 — Sweden's Constitutional Revision Committee has advanced an amendment to Tryckfrihetsförordningen removing police-seized digital materials from public record status, with the first-reading vote scheduled for 2026-04-22. This is the highest DIW-scored item (8.48) because of the 30% democratic infrastructure weighting — a constitutional change takes decades to reverse and directly affects press freedom and government accountability.
 
@@ -186,7 +184,7 @@ graph LR
 
 **MANDATORY RHETORICAL TENSION**: These two lead stories embody a striking contradiction. Sweden, which is cementing itself as an international rule-of-law champion on Ukraine accountability, is simultaneously narrowing its own domestic transparency architecture. This tension is the analytical heart of this monitoring run and MUST be surfaced explicitly in any published article.
 
-## Aggregated SWOT
+### Aggregated SWOT
 
 **Strengths**: Constitutional process integrity (KU33 vilande mechanism ensures democratic deliberation across election); Ukraine norm-entrepreneurship (Special Tribunal + Compensation Commission positions Sweden globally); cross-party consensus on Ukraine.
 
@@ -196,7 +194,7 @@ graph LR
 
 **Threats**: ECHR Article 10 challenge (KU33); election risk that KU33 fails second reading if opposition wins September 2026; SD cost resistance on Ukraine compensation; Russian information operations targeting Sweden's Ukraine tribunal advocacy.
 
-## Risk Landscape Summary
+### Risk Landscape Summary
 
 | Priority | Risk | Score | Horizon |
 |----------|------|-------|---------|
@@ -205,7 +203,7 @@ graph LR
 | 3 | SD cooperation withdrawal | 0.36 | 3-9m |
 | 4 | ECHR challenge to KU33 | 0.35 | 6-24m |
 
-## Forward Indicators — What to Watch
+### Forward Indicators — What to Watch
 
 | Date | Event | Significance | Alert threshold |
 |------|-------|-------------|----------------|
@@ -215,11 +213,11 @@ graph LR
 | 2026-09 | Swedish election | KU33 second reading fate | If S+V+MP win majority |
 | 2027-01 | KU33 second reading (if confirmed election) | Final constitutional decision | Vote outcome |
 
-## Economic Context
+### Economic Context
 
 Sweden's GDP grew 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from -0.20% contraction in 2023), while inflation fell to 2.84% (from 8.55% in 2023). This improving but fragile macroeconomic position shapes the fiscal feasibility of Ukraine compensation contributions. Finance Minister Svantesson's Vårproposition (HD03100) projects continued modest growth, but the fiscal space for open-ended international commitments is constrained — a tension between Ukraine ambition and economic prudence that runs through HD03232.
 
-## 🛡️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Box
+### 🛡️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Box
 
 > *What would a steelman critique of this synthesis say?*
 
@@ -229,7 +227,7 @@ Sweden's GDP grew 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from -0.20% contraction in 2023), wh
 
 **Red-team position on Scenario C (bear)**: We assign Scenario C only 0.20 probability despite meaningful Lagrådet and SD cost-risk. An alternative analysis giving Scenario C 0.30 would require either (a) polling showing Tidö bloc < 44% in May, or (b) an early SD public red-line on HD03232. Neither has materialised as of 2026-04-19. **Verdict**: Scenario C probability will be raised to 0.30 if either trigger fires.
 
-## 🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed)
+### 🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed)
 
 Linked from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md) §ACH:
 
@@ -239,7 +237,7 @@ Linked from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 4. **Will SD hold or defect on HD03232?** SD's cost-transparency demand is the most likely fracture point; no public red line yet. `[MEDIUM]`
 5. **Will Russian hybrid response escalate after HD03231 chamber vote?** Baseline rising post-NATO accession (2024); tribunal accession adds target signature. `[MEDIUM on direction / LOW on magnitude]`
 
-## 🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter
+### 🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Delta from 1434 |
 |-----------|:----------:|:---------------:|
@@ -252,7 +250,7 @@ Linked from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | Russian hybrid response magnitude | **MEDIUM** | → |
 | US tribunal posture | **LOW** | → |
 
-## 🔗 Cross-File Navigation
+### 🔗 Cross-File Navigation
 
 - For the one-page decision brief: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md)
 - For scenario probabilities and ACH grid: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md)
@@ -261,15 +259,14 @@ Linked from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 - For per-document deep-dive: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md) (LEAD, L3)
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **SIG-ID**: SIG-20260419-1219  
 **Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling  
 **Version**: 2.0 (Pass 2 — fully enriched)
 
-## Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) Scoring Matrix
+### Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) Scoring Matrix
 
 | # | dok_id | Document | DI (30%) | ParSig (15%) | PolImp (15%) | PubInt (15%) | Urgency (15%) | Cross-party (10%) | **DIW Score** |
 |---|--------|----------|----------|--------------|--------------|--------------|---------------|-------------------|---------------|
@@ -280,7 +277,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **DIW Weight Formula**: (DI×0.30) + (ParSig×0.15) + (PolImp×0.15) + (PubInt×0.15) + (Urgency×0.15) + (Cross×0.10)
 
-## Lead Story Decision
+### Lead Story Decision
 
 **Lead Story**: **HD01KU33** — Score 8.48 (highest DIW, constitutional amendment)  
 **Co-Lead**: **HD03231+HD03232** — Score 8.33 (Ukraine law package, timely with royal diplomatic visit)  
@@ -288,7 +285,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Rationale**: KU33 scores highest because the 30% Democratic Infrastructure weight captures the constitutional significance of narrowing offentlighetsprincipen — a reversal that can only be undone after an election. The Ukraine propositions score only slightly lower due to extraordinary public interest (9.0) combined with the King's visit to Kyiv.
 
-## Rhetorical Tension
+### Rhetorical Tension
 
 The session presents a striking juxtaposition:
 - KU33 **narrows** public transparency rights (offentlighetsprincipen) for law enforcement seizures
@@ -296,21 +293,21 @@ The session presents a striking juxtaposition:
 
 This tension between domestic transparency restriction and international accountability promotion MUST be surfaced in the article.
 
-## Coverage Completeness Check
+### Coverage Completeness Check
 
 Documents with DIW ≥ 7.0 requiring dedicated H3 sections:
 - [x] HD01KU33 (8.48) → must be H3
 - [x] HD03231+HD03232 (8.33) → must be H3  
 - [x] HD01KU32 (7.98) → must be H3
 
-## Publication Decision
+### Publication Decision
 
 **PUBLISH**: YES — HIGH severity (maximum DIW 8.48 > threshold 7.0)  
 **Type**: Breaking / Realtime update  
 **Languages**: EN + SV  
 **Confidence**: HIGH (live MCP data, government sources confirmed)
 
-## Sensitivity Analysis
+### Sensitivity Analysis
 
 If we increase Cross-party weight to 15% (at expense of DI):
 - Ukraine package moves to #1 (broad cross-party + international weight)
@@ -319,7 +316,7 @@ If we increase Cross-party weight to 15% (at expense of DI):
 
 This sensitivity confirms the article should treat BOTH stories as co-leads.
 
-## Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity Runs
+### Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity Runs
 
 | Perturbation | DI | ParSig | PolImp | PubInt | Urgency | Cross | KU33 | Ukraine | KU32 | CU28 | Lead? |
 |--------------|:--:|:------:|:------:|:------:|:-------:|:-----:|:----:|:-------:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|
@@ -332,7 +329,7 @@ This sensitivity confirms the article should treat BOTH stories as co-leads.
 
 **Verdict**: KU33 wins outright under baseline weights (Democratic-Infrastructure emphasis). Under 4 of 5 alternative weights, Ukraine package takes the lead or ties. This confirms the **co-lead treatment** is analytically sound — either story could plausibly be the lead under minor weight perturbation, justifying equal article prominence.
 
-## Publication Decision Annex
+### Publication Decision Annex
 
 | Parameter | Value | Justification |
 |-----------|-------|---------------|
@@ -346,15 +343,14 @@ This sensitivity confirms the article should treat BOTH stories as co-leads.
 | **Confidence declaration** | HIGH on lead; MEDIUM post-election | Per `executive-brief.md` analyst-confidence meter |
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **STA-ID**: STA-20260419-1219  
 **Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling  
 **Version**: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched — 8 stakeholder groups + named actors)
 
-## Impact Radar
+### Impact Radar
 
 ```mermaid
 radar
@@ -369,9 +365,9 @@ radar
     Media Public Opinion: 9
 ```
 
-## 8 Stakeholder Group Analysis
+### 8 Stakeholder Group Analysis
 
-### 1. Citizens
+#### 1. Citizens
 
 **Impact**: HIGH (7/10) | **Stance**: MIXED
 
@@ -387,7 +383,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 **Named actors**: Individual Swedish citizens represented by TU (Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå) editorial interest; organized through media unions.
 
-### 2. Government parties (M, KD, L) + support party (SD)
+#### 2. Government parties (M, KD, L) + support party (SD)
 
 **Impact**: HIGH (8/10) | **Stance**: SUPPORTIVE
 
@@ -403,7 +399,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 **KD**: Strongly supportive of Ukraine — consistent with Christian democratic values; no risk of defection on HD03231/232.
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)
 
 **Impact**: HIGH (7/10) | **Stance**: MIXED — SUPPORT Ukraine, OPPOSE KU33
 
@@ -415,7 +411,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 **Key tension**: S may feel politically trapped — opposing KU33 civil liberties restrictions while supporting the same government's Ukraine propositions creates messaging complexity.
 
-### 4. Business & Industry
+#### 4. Business & Industry
 
 **Impact**: MEDIUM (5/10) | **Stance**: MIXED
 
@@ -425,7 +421,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 **Technology sector**: HD03244 (public sector interoperability, from April 16) creates new market for digital services; not covered in this run but context for policy trend.
 
-### 5. Civil Society
+#### 5. Civil Society
 
 **Impact**: HIGH (8/10) | **Stance**: CRITICAL of KU33, SUPPORTIVE of Ukraine
 
@@ -439,7 +435,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 **Brottsofferjouren**: CU28 housing register indirectly reduces property crime; supportive.
 
-### 6. International / EU
+#### 6. International / EU
 
 **Impact**: VERY HIGH (9/10) | **Stance**: POSITIVE (Ukraine), WATCHING (KU33)
 
@@ -451,7 +447,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 **Ukraine government**: HD03231 and HD03232 directly advance Ukrainian war accountability interests. Combined with the King's visit, this represents Sweden's strongest pro-Ukraine legislative moment since NATO accession.
 
-### 7. Judiciary & Constitutional
+#### 7. Judiciary & Constitutional
 
 **Impact**: VERY HIGH (9/10) | **Stance**: PROFESSIONAL (implementing); POTENTIALLY CRITICAL on KU33 scope
 
@@ -463,7 +459,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 **International Criminal Court**: Sweden is already an ICC member. Adding Special Tribunal (HD03231) creates a parallel jurisdiction for aggression crimes — complementary to ICC, which cannot try heads-of-state of non-member states (Russia is not an ICC member for this purpose).
 
-### 8. Media & Public Opinion
+#### 8. Media & Public Opinion
 
 **Impact**: VERY HIGH (9/10) | **Stance**: CONFLICTED
 
@@ -477,7 +473,7 @@ Citizens face two countervailing developments:
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Influence Network
+### 🕸️ Influence Network
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -531,7 +527,7 @@ graph TD
 - **Civil-society coalition** (SJF + TU + Utgivarna + RSF-SE) is a coordinated campaign network specific to KU33.
 - **Lagrådet → KU33** is the single most consequential pre-vote edge in the network.
 
-## 🌳 Tidö Coalition Fracture-Probability Tree
+### 🌳 Tidö Coalition Fracture-Probability Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -555,7 +551,7 @@ graph TD
 - Åkesson column / SR Ekot interview referencing HD03232
 - Budget-deal negotiating posture on 2026 Vårändringsbudget
 
-## 📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 sentences per group)
+### 📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 sentences per group)
 
 | Group | 3-Sentence Briefing |
 |-------|---------------------|
@@ -569,8 +565,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Media & public opinion** | Frame the rhetorical tension (domestic narrowing vs international accountability). Royal Kyiv visit is the broadcast-friendly entry point for Ukraine; KU33 is the technical-constitutional narrative. |
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **SCN-ID**: SCN-20260419-1219
 **Date**: 2026-04-19
@@ -581,7 +576,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview
+### 🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -607,9 +602,9 @@ Probabilities are point estimates with a ±0.10 epistemic band. They are updated
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Three Base Scenarios
+### 🧭 Three Base Scenarios
 
-### Scenario A — **Base Case: Orderly Dual-Track Advance** (P = 0.55)
+#### Scenario A — **Base Case: Orderly Dual-Track Advance** (P = 0.55)
 
 **Narrative**: First reading of KU33 + KU32 passes 2026-04-22 with government majority (M + SD + L + KD holding). Lagrådet yttrande interprets "*formellt tillförd bevisning*" conservatively enough to neutralise the strongest civil-liberties critique. HD03231 and HD03232 are referred to UU in late April, return as a betänkande in May–June, and pass chamber with cross-party Ja (SD attaches a cost-transparency reservation to HD03232). Ukraine tribunal accession completes before summer recess. Campaign season frames KU33 as a civil-liberties vs. law-enforcement trade-off; S position remains ambiguous into August polling.
 
@@ -626,7 +621,7 @@ Probabilities are point estimates with a ±0.10 epistemic band. They are updated
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario B — **Bull Case: Lagrådet Narrows, Ukraine Surges** (P = 0.20)
+#### Scenario B — **Bull Case: Lagrådet Narrows, Ukraine Surges** (P = 0.20)
 
 **Narrative**: Lagrådet yttrande on KU33 imposes a strict, literal reading of "*formellt tillförd bevisning*" — requiring formal documentation of incorporation before the carve-out attaches. This neutralises the SJF/RSF critique and lifts opposition uncertainty. Meanwhile, Ukraine propositions become a unifying national moment after the King's Kyiv visit saturates broadcast cycles. Cross-party support on HD03231 + HD03232 becomes unanimous in chamber. SD formally endorses both on Åkesson's public platform. Sweden positions as a norm-entrepreneur, attracting a follow-up invitation to host a preliminary tribunal preparatory conference.
 
@@ -643,7 +638,7 @@ Probabilities are point estimates with a ±0.10 epistemic band. They are updated
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario C — **Bear Case: Procedural Drag + SD Defection** (P = 0.20)
+#### Scenario C — **Bear Case: Procedural Drag + SD Defection** (P = 0.20)
 
 **Narrative**: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on the discretionary dimension of "*formellt tillförd bevisning*," amplifying SJF/RSF criticism. Tidö coalition holds first reading vote but with < 180 Ja votes (signalling internal fracture). SD announces a formal reservation on HD03232 cost projections, forcing a UU-committee compromise that inserts a Swedish contribution ceiling. S seizes on the KU33 ambiguity as a pre-election wedge issue. Press-freedom NGO coalition files a preemptive ECHR complaint. September election produces S-led minority government; KU33 second reading is renegotiated with a statutory (not grundlag) fallback.
 
@@ -661,9 +656,9 @@ Probabilities are point estimates with a ±0.10 epistemic band. They are updated
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ Two Wildcards — Low-Probability / High-Impact
+### ⚡ Two Wildcards — Low-Probability / High-Impact
 
-### Wildcard W1 — **Russian hybrid retaliation after HD03231 chamber vote** (P = 0.04 · Impact = HIGH)
+#### Wildcard W1 — **Russian hybrid retaliation after HD03231 chamber vote** (P = 0.04 · Impact = HIGH)
 
 Sweden's formal accession to the Special Tribunal for Aggression makes it the newest target of a pattern of Russian hybrid operations previously documented against Baltic and Nordic states (e.g., the 2023 SIS/SÄPO reports on Russian information ops targeting Swedish NATO discourse). Attack vectors documented in `threat-analysis.md` §4 include: (a) coordinated inauthentic behaviour amplifying KU33 "hypocrisy" framing in Swedish-language social media; (b) targeted phishing against UD officials working on tribunal accession; (c) DDoS against riksdagen.se during chamber-vote windows; (d) opportunistic diplomatic expulsion retaliation.
 
@@ -674,7 +669,7 @@ Sweden's formal accession to the Special Tribunal for Aggression makes it the ne
 
 ---
 
-### Wildcard W2 — **US administration withdrawal from tribunal coordination** (P = 0.06 · Impact = MEDIUM)
+#### Wildcard W2 — **US administration withdrawal from tribunal coordination** (P = 0.06 · Impact = MEDIUM)
 
 The US political posture on the Special Tribunal has been ambiguous across recent transitions. A formal withdrawal from tribunal coordination, or a public statement questioning its legitimacy, would be damaging — not because US membership is required, but because it would embolden non-European participating states to disengage and would rhetorically weaken the tribunal's claim to be "the international community's" response. Sweden's accession momentum could be seen as the ceiling rather than the floor of Western commitment.
 
@@ -685,7 +680,7 @@ The US political posture on the Special Tribunal has been ambiguous across recen
 
 ---
 
-## 🔬 ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses
+### 🔬 ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses
 
 We test the question: **"What is the probability KU33 second reading confirms the grundlag amendment in January 2027?"**
 
@@ -706,7 +701,7 @@ Aggregating H1 + H2 + modified confirmations gives the `executive-brief.md` seco
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Monitoring Trigger Calendar — Mapped to Scenario Shifts
+### 📅 Monitoring Trigger Calendar — Mapped to Scenario Shifts
 
 | Date | Event | Scenario Updated | New Signal |
 |------|-------|------------------|-----------|
@@ -722,7 +717,7 @@ Aggregating H1 + H2 + modified confirmations gives the `executive-brief.md` seco
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Cross-Reference to Upstream Work
+### 🔗 Cross-Reference to Upstream Work
 
 - **Scenario continuity** with [`analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md): the grundlag base/bull/bear structure introduced in 1434 is retained; probabilities updated downward for base (−0.05) on the basis of HD03232 cost uncertainty emerging in 1219.
 - **Post-election probability priors** drawn from [`analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md) (if present) or the closest weekly-review available; divergences from weekly-review scenarios are justified in `methodology-reflection.md` §Probability-Alignment Audit.
@@ -730,7 +725,7 @@ Aggregating H1 + H2 + modified confirmations gives the `executive-brief.md` seco
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Confidence Markers & Known Limitations
+### ⚠️ Confidence Markers & Known Limitations
 
 1. **Base-case probability (0.55)** has a ±0.10 epistemic band — do not treat as precise.
 2. **Post-election conditional probabilities** depend on poll-to-seat translations that are non-linear near majority boundary (around 175 seats).
@@ -742,15 +737,14 @@ Aggregating H1 + H2 + modified confirmations gives the `executive-brief.md` seco
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-05-01 (after KU33 first reading + Lagrådet yttrande) · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 6 (L3 tier) + ACH doctrine
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **RSK-ID**: RSK-20260419-1219
 **Date**: 2026-04-19
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Version**: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: 10 risks, interconnection graph, ALARP mapping)
 
-## Risk Heat Map
+### Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -770,7 +764,7 @@ quadrantChart
     Ukraine Tribunal Stalls: [0.60, 0.35]
 ```
 
-## Ranked Risk Register
+### Ranked Risk Register
 
 | # | Risk | Likelihood (L) | Impact (I) | L×I | Trend | Mitigation |
 |---|------|---------------|-----------|-----|-------|-----------|
@@ -782,13 +776,13 @@ quadrantChart
 | 6 | **Grundlag amendment rejected** — September 2026 election produces majority that refuses second reading | 0.30 | 0.85 | **0.26** | Stable | Electoral arithmetic: requires both S and V to oppose |
 | 7 | **Ukraine Tribunal stalls** — Geopolitical shifts reduce participation; tribunal loses jurisdiction | 0.35 | 0.65 | **0.23** | Stable | Track Council of Europe participation numbers |
 
-## Cascading Risk Analysis
+### Cascading Risk Analysis
 
 **Primary risk chain**: SD withdrawal (Risk 3) → budget deal collapse → government confidence vote → snap election → KU33 second reading fails (Risk 6) → constitutional amendment abandoned.
 
 **Probability of chain**: P(3) × P(chain given 3) = 0.45 × 0.35 = **0.16 (16%)** — within planning horizon for 2026-2027.
 
-## Bayesian Update
+### Bayesian Update
 
 Prior probability (pre-session): Government stability = 0.65  
 New evidence: Multiple propositions passing committee, Ukraine propositions advancing = moderate positive signal  
@@ -796,7 +790,7 @@ Posterior: Government stability = **0.68** (+0.03 update)
 
 Evidence weight: KU committees advancing government proposals without major dissent signals coalition cohesion is holding.
 
-## Risk by Dimension
+### Risk by Dimension
 
 | Dimension | Top Risk | Score | Time horizon |
 |-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
@@ -806,7 +800,7 @@ Evidence weight: KU committees advancing government proposals without major diss
 | Legal | ECHR challenge to KU33 | 6.0/10 | 6-24 months |
 | Administrative | CU28 implementation delay | 4.5/10 | 12-24 months |
 
-## Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)
+### Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)
 
 The following three additional risks complete the reference-grade register:
 
@@ -816,7 +810,7 @@ The following three additional risks complete the reference-grade register:
 | 9 | **Russian hybrid interference escalation after HD03231 chamber vote** — coordinated inauthentic behaviour, phishing against UD, DDoS against riksdagen.se | 0.40 | 0.75 | **0.30** | 0-90 days post-vote | SÄPO liaison heightened; CERT-SE vigilance; MSB public-communication preparedness |
 | 10 | **US administration withdraws from tribunal coordination** — public statement questioning Special Tribunal legitimacy; emboldens non-European disengagement | 0.25 | 0.65 | **0.16** | 3-12 months | Diplomatic contingency with DE, FR, UK, NL; NATO/CoE escalation path |
 
-## Risk Interconnection Graph
+### Risk Interconnection Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -844,7 +838,7 @@ Key interconnection findings:
 - **R8 amplifies R4 and R1** — a weak Lagrådet yttrande both raises ECHR challenge probability and hardens opposition second-reading stance.
 - **R2 → R3 feedback loop** — if HD03232 passes with tight fiscal budget, subsequent contribution increases could trigger SD withdrawal.
 
-## ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) Mapping
+### ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) Mapping
 
 | Risk | Current level | Target level | Mitigation cost | Effectiveness | ALARP verdict |
 |------|:-------------:|:------------:|:---------------:|:-------------:|:-------------:|
@@ -856,7 +850,7 @@ Key interconnection findings:
 | R9 Russian hybrid | 0.30 | 0.20 | HIGH (hybrid defence investment) | MEDIUM | **Reduce & Accept** — partial |
 | R10 US withdrawal | 0.16 | 0.16 | HIGH (diplomatic capital) | LOW | **Accept** — exogenous |
 
-## Bayesian Forward-Looking Update Rules
+### Bayesian Forward-Looking Update Rules
 
 Given a new signal at time t, update the posterior probability of each risk:
 
@@ -871,15 +865,14 @@ Given a new signal at time t, update the posterior probability of each risk:
 | SOM poll Tidö bloc > 50% | R1 × 0.6 · R3 × 0.8 |
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **SWT-ID**: SWT-20260419-1219
 **Date**: 2026-04-19
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Version**: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: full TOWS matrix, cluster-specific quadrants, Mermaid mindmap retained)
 
-## SWOT Quadrant Mapping
+### SWOT Quadrant Mapping
 
 ```mermaid
 mindmap
@@ -926,9 +919,9 @@ mindmap
         Compensation commission funding unpredictable
 ```
 
-## Quadrant Analysis
+### Quadrant Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 | Strength | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -936,7 +929,7 @@ mindmap
 | Ukraine accountability leadership | Sweden among ~40 states joining Special Tribunal; first European country to propose bilateral compensation framework alongside accession | HD03231, HD03232 | HIGH |
 | Cross-party Ukraine consensus | HD03231/232 submitted by FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M); expected broad support from S, M, L, C, KD, and MP | HD03231 | MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 | Weakness | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -944,7 +937,7 @@ mindmap
 | Law enforcement opacity | Critics (V, MP expected) argue carve-out is disproportionate to stated crime-fighting rationale | HD01KU33 | MEDIUM |
 | Minority government dependency | Kristersson government cannot pass any legislation without SD support; SD can extract policy concessions at each vote | All docs | HIGH |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 | Opportunity | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |-------------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -952,7 +945,7 @@ mindmap
 | Digital modernization | CU28 national bostadsrättsregister will reduce mortgage fraud and improve market transparency | HD01CU28 | HIGH |
 | Housing market integrity | Identity requirements for lagfart (HD01CU27) combined with CU28 register creates anti-money-laundering layer | HD01CU27, HD01CU28 | MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 | Threat | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |--------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -960,7 +953,7 @@ mindmap
 | Election timing risk | KU33 must be confirmed by post-September 2026 riksdag; if opposition wins majority, amendment could be rejected | HD01KU33 | MEDIUM |
 | Compensation commission cost | International Compensation Commission for Ukraine may involve Swedish financial contributions not yet quantified | HD03232 | MEDIUM |
 
-## TOWS Interference Analysis
+### TOWS Interference Analysis
 
 **S1×T1 (Strength-Threat interference)**: Ukraine rule-of-law leadership (S) is in tension with the constitutional narrowing (W) — Sweden cannot credibly champion international accountability while narrowing domestic transparency.
 
@@ -968,7 +961,7 @@ mindmap
 
 **O3×T3 (Opportunity-Threat interaction)**: Housing market modernization creates opportunity for anti-corruption, but Ukraine compensation funding uncertainty creates fiscal pressure that could divert resources from other reforms.
 
-## Full TOWS Interference Matrix
+### Full TOWS Interference Matrix
 
 The TOWS matrix reads *Internal × External* interactions to derive strategic postures:
 
@@ -981,7 +974,7 @@ The TOWS matrix reads *Internal × External* interactions to derive strategic po
 |                 | W1 × O1: Offentlighetsprincipen narrowing *undermines* rule-of-law leadership → fix via strict Lagrådet language | W1 × T1: KU33 narrowing + ECHR challenge = reputational double-hit; prepare defence memorandum |
 |                 | W3 × O3: Minority-government dependency *fits* housing-reform MoU logic — structured consultative reform | W3 × T2: SD cost resistance on HD03232 + tight fiscal space = budget-deal fragility |
 
-### Cluster-Specific Quadrants
+#### Cluster-Specific Quadrants
 
 **Cluster A — KU33 (seizure transparency)**
 
@@ -1017,7 +1010,7 @@ The TOWS matrix reads *Internal × External* interactions to derive strategic po
 | O | Constitutional anchor for future accessibility legislation | MEDIUM |
 | T | Normalises grundlag-as-legislative-tool pattern | MEDIUM |
 
-## Cross-Reference to Stakeholder Influence
+### Cross-Reference to Stakeholder Influence
 
 SWOT entries mapped to influence network in [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md) §Influence Network. Key coupling:
 
@@ -1026,8 +1019,7 @@ SWOT entries mapped to influence network in [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](http
 - **T2 × SD Åkesson** — SD cost posture is the Ukraine-package single point of failure
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **THR-ID**: THR-20260419-1219
 **Date**: 2026-04-19
@@ -1035,7 +1027,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Version**: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: Attack Tree, Diamond Model, STRIDE pass, MITRE-TTP)
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH
 
-## Threat Taxonomy
+### Threat Taxonomy
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1065,9 +1057,9 @@ graph LR
     style C fill:#ffdd44,color:#000
 ```
 
-## 6-Category Threat Analysis
+### 6-Category Threat Analysis
 
-### 1. Constitutional-Institutional Threats
+#### 1. Constitutional-Institutional Threats
 
 **KU33 — Offentlighetsprincipen Narrowing Pattern**  
 *Severity*: HIGH | *Confidence*: HIGH | *Attribution*: Government (Kristersson/KU majority)
@@ -1082,7 +1074,7 @@ The KU33 betänkande proposes to remove seized digital materials from "allmän h
 5. *Installation*: TF amendment takes effect January 2027
 6. *Persistence*: Future governments cannot restore without new grundlag process (2+ years)
 
-### 2. Political Threats
+#### 2. Political Threats
 
 **SD Cooperation Fracture Risk**  
 *Severity*: HIGH | *Confidence*: MEDIUM | *Attribution*: Sweden Democrats (Jimmy Åkesson)
@@ -1091,7 +1083,7 @@ SD's support for Ukraine propositions (HD03231, HD03232) is not guaranteed. SD b
 
 **Evidence**: SD Deputy PM (none — SD not in government) but Tidö Agreement requires SD to "not block" certain proposals. Ukraine propositions are UU-committee matters; SD's UFöU contribution to HD01UFöU3 (NATO Finland) suggests acceptance of defence commitments but stopping short of financial pledges.
 
-### 3. Legal Threats
+#### 3. Legal Threats
 
 **ECHR Article 10 — Freedom of Expression Challenge**  
 *Severity*: MEDIUM | *Confidence*: MEDIUM | *Attribution*: Journalists unions, NGOs
@@ -1101,7 +1093,7 @@ The removal of seized materials from allmän handling status weakens press acces
 **EU Directive Compliance Risk**:  
 KU32 (media accessibility) is driven by EU's Accessibility Act and European Electronic Communications Code. Any failure to correctly transpose could trigger EU infringement proceedings.
 
-### 4. International Threats
+#### 4. International Threats
 
 **Russia Hybrid Interference in Ukraine Accountability Process**  
 *Severity*: HIGH | *Confidence*: MEDIUM | *Attribution*: Russian government, proxies
@@ -1113,7 +1105,7 @@ As Sweden formally accedes to both the Special Tribunal (HD03231) and Compensati
 - T1583.002 — DNS Server: Information manipulation targeting Swedish media covering Ukraine tribunal
 - T1566 — Phishing: Target Swedish Foreign Ministry officials working on tribunal accession
 
-### 5. Democratic Norm Threats
+#### 5. Democratic Norm Threats
 
 **Offentlighetsprincipen Erosion Pattern**  
 *Severity*: CRITICAL | *Confidence*: HIGH | *Attribution*: Systemic — not attributed to single actor
@@ -1128,7 +1120,7 @@ The combination of KU32 and KU33 in the same riksmöte represents a pattern of i
 | Second KU33 reading | January 2027 | Requires same wording post-election | New Riksdag | 2027-01 |
 | ECHR timeline | Not yet filed | Filing → formal ECHR review | Journalists union | TBD |
 
-### 6. Economic Threats
+#### 6. Economic Threats
 
 **Ukraine Compensation Commission Financial Exposure**  
 *Severity*: MEDIUM | *Confidence*: LOW-MEDIUM | *Attribution*: International fiscal commitments
@@ -1139,7 +1131,7 @@ HD03232 commits Sweden to the Convention establishing the International Compensa
 
 ---
 
-## 🌲 Attack Tree — KU33 Transparency Degradation Chain
+### 🌲 Attack Tree — KU33 Transparency Degradation Chain
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1176,7 +1168,7 @@ graph TD
 - A4 — mobilise press-freedom as electoral issue
 - A5 — negotiate modified text post-election (Scenario C pathway)
 
-## 💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Interference Against HD03231
+### 💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Interference Against HD03231
 
 | Vertex | Content |
 |--------|---------|
@@ -1188,7 +1180,7 @@ graph TD
 | **Technology meta** | AI-generated deepfake content capacity rising; LLM-driven content farms |
 | **Event pivot** | 2026-04-22 first-reading vote; Q2 2026 chamber vote on HD03231 |
 
-## 🔐 STRIDE Pass — Sweden's Ukraine-Tribunal Engagement Surface
+### 🔐 STRIDE Pass — Sweden's Ukraine-Tribunal Engagement Surface
 
 | STRIDE | Threat | Target | Severity |
 |--------|--------|--------|:--------:|
@@ -1199,7 +1191,7 @@ graph TD
 | **D**enial of Service | DDoS against riksdagen.se during 2026-04-22 and HD03231 vote | Riksdag public-facing systems | MEDIUM |
 | **E**levation of privilege | Phishing-enabled access to UD personnel working on tribunal | UD endpoints | HIGH |
 
-## 🎯 MITRE-TTP Mapping (adapted to political-threat context)
+### 🎯 MITRE-TTP Mapping (adapted to political-threat context)
 
 | TTP | Technique | Expected use against SE post-HD03231 |
 |-----|-----------|-------------------------------------|
@@ -1212,7 +1204,7 @@ graph TD
 | T1583.002 | Acquire Infrastructure: DNS Server | Content manipulation for Swedish-language Ukraine coverage |
 | T1189 | Drive-by Compromise | Target Swedish journalist community covering KU33 |
 
-## 📊 Threat-Indicator Library (consolidated across §§ 1-6)
+### 📊 Threat-Indicator Library (consolidated across §§ 1-6)
 
 | Indicator | Status | Trigger | Owner | Deadline |
 |-----------|--------|---------|-------|----------|
@@ -1230,8 +1222,7 @@ graph TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01KU32
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01KU32  
 **Depth Tier**: L2+ (P0 Constitutional)  
@@ -1240,7 +1231,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling  
 **Version**: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)
 
-## Document Identity
+### Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1253,20 +1244,20 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 | **Effect date** | 1 January 2027 (if confirmed) |
 | **EU driver** | European Accessibility Act (Directive 2019/882) + EECC |
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 KU32 amends both TF and YGL to allow broader accessibility requirements to be imposed by ordinary law on constitutionally protected media products. Currently, TF and YGL shield products like e-books, streaming services, and digital publications from certain requirements — including accessibility mandates — because imposing such requirements would require constitutional authority. KU32 creates that constitutional authority, enabling Sweden to fully comply with the EU's Accessibility Act.
 
 This is a less controversial constitutional amendment than KU33 — it expands the ability to impose accessibility standards on media rather than restricting public access rights. However, the simultaneous passage of KU32 and KU33 in the same riksmöte establishes a pattern of constitutional amendment as routine legislative tool that warrants monitoring.
 
-## Key Policy Changes
+### Key Policy Changes
 
 - **E-books and digital content**: Accessibility requirements (screen reader compatibility, alt text, captioning) can now be mandated by ordinary law for TF/YGL-protected digital content
 - **E-commerce services**: Accessibility standards for digital shopping platforms with media components
 - **Vidaresändning** (must-carry broadcasting): Accessibility services (subtitling, audio description) must be carried beyond just public service broadcasters
 - **Advertising and product information**: Packaging information requirements can be expanded under ordinary law
 
-## SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)
+### SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)
 
 | SWOT | Entry | Confidence |
 |------|-------|-----------|
@@ -1277,7 +1268,7 @@ This is a less controversial constitutional amendment than KU33 — it expands t
 | T | Media industry compliance costs | LOW |
 | T | Two grundlag amendments in one riksmöte — normalizes process | MEDIUM |
 
-## Named Actors
+### Named Actors
 
 | Actor | Role | Stance |
 |-------|------|-------|
@@ -1286,7 +1277,7 @@ This is a less controversial constitutional amendment than KU33 — it expands t
 | Funktionstillgänglighet | Disability organizations | SUPPORT |
 | Media sector (TV4, SVT) | Compliance obligation | NEUTRAL/CONCERNED about costs |
 
-## Forward Indicators
+### Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Date | Significance |
 |-----------|------|-------------|
@@ -1295,8 +1286,7 @@ This is a less controversial constitutional amendment than KU33 — it expands t
 | Implementation regulation | 2026 H2 | Ordinary law requirements under new constitutional authority |
 
 ### HD01KU33
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01KU33  
 **Depth Tier**: L3 (P0 Constitutional)  
@@ -1305,7 +1295,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling  
 **Version**: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched — full L3 content)
 
-## Document Identity
+### Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1321,31 +1311,31 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 | **Constitutional text** | Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) — fundamental law |
 | **URL** | https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33.html |
 
-## Two-Paragraph Significance
+### Two-Paragraph Significance
 
 KU33 proposes a targeted but constitutionally significant amendment to Sweden's Tryckfrihetsförordningen: digital materials seized or copied during police raids — husrannsakan — would no longer automatically qualify as "allmänna handlingar" (public documents). The current rule means that once material enters a government authority's possession, it presumptively becomes public. KU33 creates an exception for law enforcement seizure contexts, preventing journalists and citizens from requesting access to seized materials during active investigations.
 
 The democratic significance exceeds the narrow legal description. Offentlighetsprincipen — Sweden's 250-year-old public access framework — has been eroded incrementally over recent decades, with each exception justified as proportionate and limited. KU33's carve-out follows the same logic. But constitutional changes of this kind require two riksdag votes separated by an election, precisely because the founders understood that no single legislative majority should be able to permanently narrow fundamental freedoms. The real question is whether the post-September 2026 riksdag will confirm what the current one initiates.
 
-## 6-Lens Analysis
+### 6-Lens Analysis
 
-### Lens 1: Historical Context
+#### Lens 1: Historical Context
 Offentlighetsprincipen dates to the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766 — the world's first. Sweden pioneered public access to government records as a constitutional right. Each amendment to TF carries symbolic weight far exceeding its technical scope. KU33 is the 27th or 28th amendment to TF since it was incorporated into the constitutional framework; however, most prior amendments expanded rights (EU compliance, digital formats). This amendment restricts.
 
-### Lens 2: Legal-Constitutional Impact
+#### Lens 2: Legal-Constitutional Impact
 The amendment removes seized digital materials from the definition of "allmän handling" during: (a) law enforcement investigations, (b) upon transfer of information-bearing devices to authorities, and (c) when an authority takes over custody of seized copying-derived data. The carve-out ends when material is "tillförd en utredning" (incorporated into a formal investigation file) — at that point, normal public access rules resume. Critics note that defining when material is "incorporated" into an investigation file is discretionary, creating enforcement ambiguity.
 
-### Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact
+#### Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact
 For the Kristersson government, KU33 advances the law enforcement agenda consistent with HD03246 (juvenile justice), HD03233 (telecoms fraud), and HD01SfU22 (immigration enforcement). The government is constructing a comprehensive crime-fighting narrative ahead of September 2026 elections. Restricting seizure transparency is framed as protecting ongoing investigations, not restricting press.
 
 For the opposition, KU33 creates a civil liberties argument without risking the nuclear option of blocking Ukraine propositions. S can oppose KU33 while supporting Ukraine — this is a useful positioning move for Magdalena Andersson ahead of the election.
 
-### Lens 4: Media & Press Freedom Impact
+#### Lens 4: Media & Press Freedom Impact
 The Swedish Union of Journalists (SJF) and major media organizations will oppose KU33. Investigative journalism in Sweden regularly uses offentlighetsprincipen to access police seizure inventories — for example, in reporting on organized crime asset seizures, corruption investigations, and environmental violations. The exemption removes this tool for the critical period when seized information is most newsworthy.
 
 **Named actors at risk**: TT (Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå), DN investigations unit, SVT Granskar, SR Ekot investigative journalists all use seizure-related public record requests.
 
-### Lens 5: Election Implications
+#### Lens 5: Election Implications
 KU33's fate hinges on the September 2026 election. Current polling (Tidö coalition ≈ 48%) suggests the coalition could lose its working majority. If S+V+MP+MP elect a new government, they could reject the second reading — but only if they have the will to do so. S has historically been cautious about being seen as opposing law enforcement. V and MP would push for rejection.
 
 **Electoral risk matrix**:
@@ -1355,7 +1345,7 @@ KU33's fate hinges on the September 2026 election. Current polling (Tidö coalit
 | S leads minority government | 40% | S negotiates — likely confirms with modifications |
 | S+V+MP majority | 25% | Likely rejected — second reading fails |
 
-### Lens 6: International Benchmarking
+#### Lens 6: International Benchmarking
 How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?
 
 | Jurisdiction | Approach | Comparison |
@@ -1367,7 +1357,7 @@ How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?
 | Canada | Privacy Act exempts police investigations | Similar to proposed Swedish position |
 | Council of Europe | ECHR Art 10 requires proportionality test | KU33 must pass proportionality — Sweden's legal advisors will need to defend |
 
-## SWOT Table (KU33-specific)
+### SWOT Table (KU33-specific)
 
 | SWOT | Entry | Evidence | Confidence |
 |------|-------|---------|-----------|
@@ -1378,7 +1368,7 @@ How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?
 | T | ECHR Article 10 challenge | Journalists union likely to pursue European Court route | MEDIUM |
 | T | Election-dependent: uncertain second reading | If S+V+MP win September 2026, second reading may fail | MEDIUM |
 
-## Named Actor Table
+### Named Actor Table
 
 | Actor | Institution | Stance | Influence |
 |-------|------------|-------|----------|
@@ -1392,7 +1382,7 @@ How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?
 | Jonas Sjöstedt-era V | Vänsterpartiet | STRONGLY OPPOSE | MEDIUM |
 | Ann-Sofie Alm | KU chair (M) | PROPOSE adoption | HIGH |
 
-## Indicator Library
+### Indicator Library
 
 | Indicator | Status | Trigger | Owner | Deadline |
 |-----------|--------|--------|-------|---------|
@@ -1403,7 +1393,7 @@ How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?
 | Second reading vote | January 2027 | Final constitutional decision | New riksdag | 2027-01 |
 | TF amendment gazette | Jan 2027 if confirmed | SFS publication | Riksdag | 2027-01-01 |
 
-## Red-Team Critique
+### Red-Team Critique
 
 *Steelman for KU33*: The argument that ongoing criminal investigations require protection from evidence-alerting via FOIA-style requests is well-established in virtually every comparable democracy. A criminal suspect whose assets are being seized should not be able to use offentlighetsprincipen to learn what the police have taken before the investigation is complete. The amendment is carefully scoped — material reverts to public access once incorporated into the investigation file.
 
@@ -1412,8 +1402,7 @@ How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?
 **Verdict**: The law enforcement rationale is legitimate, but the constitutional (rather than statutory) implementation is disproportionate and sets a dangerous precedent for grundlag modification as a routine policy tool.
 
 ### HD03231\-HD03232\-ukraine
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_ids**: HD03231, HD03232  
 **Depth Tier**: L2+ (P1 Critical — International Treaty)  
@@ -1422,7 +1411,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Ha
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling  
 **Version**: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)
 
-## Document Identity
+### Document Identity
 
 | Field | HD03231 | HD03232 |
 |-------|---------|---------|
@@ -1434,15 +1423,15 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Ha
 | **Riksdag URL** | https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231 | https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232 |
 | **Diplomatic context** | King Carl Gustaf + FM visited Ukraine 2026-04-17 | Same diplomatic mission |
 
-## Combined Significance Paragraph
+### Combined Significance Paragraph
 
 Sweden is simultaneously acceding to two international legal instruments creating unprecedented accountability mechanisms for the Russia-Ukraine war. HD03231 joins Sweden to the "Expanded Partial Agreement" establishing the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine — designed to prosecute the political and military leaders responsible for Russia's February 2022 full-scale invasion, whom the International Criminal Court cannot reach because Russia is not an ICC member for this purpose. HD03232 accedes to the Convention establishing an International Compensation Commission for Ukraine, designed to ensure victims of Russian aggression receive reparations from Russian frozen assets held in European jurisdictions.
 
 Combined, these two propositions represent Sweden's most significant contribution to the international rule-of-law response to the Ukraine war since Sweden's NATO accession in 2024. The timing — submitted to Riksdag on April 16 and published the same day as the King of Sweden and FM Malmer Stenergard's visit to Kyiv — was deliberate diplomatic signalling.
 
-## 6-Lens Analysis
+### 6-Lens Analysis
 
-### Lens 1: International Law Significance
+#### Lens 1: International Law Significance
 
 **Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)**:  
 The crime of aggression — the "supreme international crime" in the words of the Nuremberg Tribunal — has historically been the hardest to prosecute. The ICC Kampala Amendment (2010) gave the ICC jurisdiction over aggression, but Russia is not a member, and the ICC cannot exercise jurisdiction over nationals of non-member states for this crime. The Special Tribunal closes this gap with a hybrid international-national mechanism. Sweden's accession joins approximately 40 states (as of April 2026) supporting the tribunal.
@@ -1450,13 +1439,13 @@ The crime of aggression — the "supreme international crime" in the words of th
 **Compensation Commission (HD03232)**:  
 The Convention on the International Register of Damage and the Compensation Commission represents the financial accountability dimension. Approximately €260bn in Russian sovereign assets are held frozen in European financial institutions (primarily Euroclear in Belgium). The Commission's mandate is to create a legal pathway for using these assets to compensate Ukrainian victims. Swedish accession strengthens the international legal basis for this asset mobilization.
 
-### Lens 2: Diplomatic Context
+#### Lens 2: Diplomatic Context
 
 The timing of the propositions (April 16) and the King's Kyiv visit (April 17) is explicitly coordinated. H.M. King Carl Gustaf's presence in Kyiv alongside FM Malmer Stenergard sends the strongest possible diplomatic signal: Sweden's head of state endorses the accountability framework being submitted to the Riksdag.
 
 This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign policy statement through a diplomatic visit — previous precedent was Carl Gustaf's Washington visit during Sweden's NATO accession process. The royal dimension elevates both propositions to a level of national commitment that transcends partisan politics.
 
-### Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact
+#### Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact
 
 **For the Kristersson government**: This is a legacy achievement. PM Kristersson has consistently positioned Sweden as a strong Ukraine ally; these propositions deliver concrete legal instruments beyond military aid. They also give the government a strong foreign policy argument heading into the September 2026 election.
 
@@ -1464,13 +1453,13 @@ This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign polic
 
 **For the opposition**: S, V, C, L all strongly support Ukraine accountability. V's historic opposition to NATO has been paused in the context of Ukraine solidarity. MP supports both propositions. This creates a rare all-party moment.
 
-### Lens 4: Coalition and Stakeholder Dynamics
+#### Lens 4: Coalition and Stakeholder Dynamics
 
 **UU committee composition**: UU will handle both propositions. The committee is chaired by a government-aligned member. Cross-party support is expected to be broad. Watch for SD reservations specifically on HD03232 cost dimensions.
 
 **NGO support**: Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, FIDH, and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court all support both instruments. Their domestic Swedish advocacy will reinforce the broad coalition.
 
-### Lens 5: Economic & Fiscal Considerations
+#### Lens 5: Economic & Fiscal Considerations
 
 **HD03232 financial implications**: The Compensation Commission needs operating budget and Swedish contribution. EU member states' contributions are typically GDP-proportional. Sweden's GDP is approximately SEK 7.5 trillion; if Swedish contribution is 2-3% of Commission operating costs, annual exposure could be SEK 50-200m for administration — manageable. The larger question is potential Swedish liability if Russian assets in Swedish jurisdiction are mobilized for compensation payments.
 
@@ -1478,7 +1467,7 @@ This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign polic
 
 **GDP context**: Sweden's 0.82% growth in 2024 (recovering from -0.20% in 2023) and falling inflation (2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023) provide a stable but not abundant fiscal backdrop. Finance Minister Svantesson has room for Ukraine commitments but not unlimited room.
 
-### Lens 6: International Benchmarking
+#### Lens 6: International Benchmarking
 
 | Country | Tribunal | Compensation Commission | Notes |
 |---------|---------|------------------------|-------|
@@ -1492,7 +1481,7 @@ This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign polic
 | Sweden | Acceding | Acceding | HD03231/HD03232 completing accession |
 | USA | Observer | Non-member | Biden admin supported; Trump posture unclear |
 
-## SWOT Table
+### SWOT Table
 
 | SWOT | Entry | Evidence | Confidence |
 |------|-------|---------|-----------|
@@ -1505,7 +1494,7 @@ This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign polic
 | T | Russian information operations | Sweden becomes target for hybrid interference | HIGH |
 | T | Geopolitical reversal risk | If US-Russia settlement bypasses tribunal framework | LOW |
 
-## Named Actor Table
+### Named Actor Table
 
 | Actor | Role | Stance | Impact |
 |-------|------|-------|--------|
@@ -1520,8 +1509,7 @@ This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign polic
 | UU Committee Chair | Committee processing | SUPPORTIVE | HIGH |
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **CMP-ID**: CMP-20260419-1219
 **Date**: 2026-04-19
@@ -1532,7 +1520,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 Jurisdiction Panel
+### 🌍 Jurisdiction Panel
 
 The panel is constructed per cluster:
 
@@ -1544,9 +1532,9 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Cluster 1 — KU33: Seizure Transparency & Offentlighetsprincipen
+### 🏛️ Cluster 1 — KU33: Seizure Transparency & Offentlighetsprincipen
 
-### Tabular benchmark
+#### Tabular benchmark
 
 | Jurisdiction | Legal regime | Presumption of access to seized digital material | Exemption mechanism | When exemption ends | Sweden relative posture |
 |-------------|--------------|:------------------------------------------------:|---------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|
@@ -1561,7 +1549,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 | **🇨🇦 CA — Canada** | Privacy Act s.22 + Access to Information Act | Categorical exemption for law-enforcement investigations | Investigation exemption s.22(1)(b) | Investigation ended or 20 years | Common-law default; SE/KU33 converges |
 | **🌍 CoE / ECHR** | ECHR Art 10 · Art 6 · Art 8 | Proportionality test required for any press-freedom restriction | *Bladet Tromsø v Norway* · *Sürek v Turkey* line | Case-by-case | **Sweden KU33 must survive Art 10 proportionality review — Venice Commission likely to opine** |
 
-### Where Sweden **innovates**, **follows**, **diverges**
+#### Where Sweden **innovates**, **follows**, **diverges**
 
 | Stance | Detail |
 |--------|--------|
@@ -1569,7 +1557,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 | **Diverges** | Sweden is the only state implementing the carve-out via **constitutional amendment** (grundlag), not statutory. DE/FI/DK/NO/UK all use ordinary law. This makes Sweden's reform **harder to reverse** and sets a precedent for grundlag as a routine legislative tool. `[HIGH confidence]` |
 | **Innovates** (negative connotation) | The "*formellt tillförd bevisning*" trigger is **novel** in European practice — comparator jurisdictions use categorical investigation-closed triggers. The interpretive ambiguity is unique to the Swedish proposal. |
 
-### Press-freedom scoring context
+#### Press-freedom scoring context
 
 | Jurisdiction | RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025 | Trend |
 |-------------|:----------------------------------:|:-----:|
@@ -1586,9 +1574,9 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 
 ---
 
-## 🎛️ Cluster 2 — KU32: Accessibility (TF + YGL Amendment)
+### 🎛️ Cluster 2 — KU32: Accessibility (TF + YGL Amendment)
 
-### Tabular benchmark
+#### Tabular benchmark
 
 | Jurisdiction | Transposition instrument | Constitutional obstacle | Deadline compliance (EU Directive 2019/882 — 28 Jun 2025) | Digital-disability population |
 |-------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------:|:-----------------------------:|
@@ -1601,7 +1589,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 | **🇫🇮 FI** | Laki digitaalisten palvelujen tarjoamisesta (transposed) | No obstacle | On-time 2025-06-28 | ~1m |
 | **🇺🇸 US** | ADA Title III + Section 508 | No constitutional obstacle (Title III pre-dates internet) | Independent regime; precedent for 21st-century enforcement | ~61m |
 
-### Where Sweden **innovates**, **follows**, **diverges**
+#### Where Sweden **innovates**, **follows**, **diverges**
 
 | Stance | Detail |
 |--------|--------|
@@ -1611,9 +1599,9 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 
 ---
 
-## 🌐 Cluster 3 — HD03231 + HD03232: Ukraine Accountability Package
+### 🌐 Cluster 3 — HD03231 + HD03232: Ukraine Accountability Package
 
-### Tabular benchmark — Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)
+#### Tabular benchmark — Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)
 
 | Jurisdiction | Status | Date | Contribution (if public) | Stance |
 |-------------|--------|------|--------------------------|--------|
@@ -1630,7 +1618,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 | **🇷🇺 RU — Russia** | Non-member | — | — | Tribunal target |
 | **🌍 CoE — Council of Europe** | Secretariat host | 2025 | Legal infrastructure | Institutional anchor |
 
-### Tabular benchmark — International Compensation Commission (HD03232)
+#### Tabular benchmark — International Compensation Commission (HD03232)
 
 | Jurisdiction | Status | Ratification date | Domestic frozen-asset base | Commitment to mobilise |
 |-------------|--------|:-----------------:|---------------------------|:-----------------------:|
@@ -1645,7 +1633,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 | **🇵🇱 PL — Poland** | Member | 2024 | Limited | Strong political commitment |
 | **🇺🇸 US — United States** | Non-member | — | ~$6bn (Treasury) | REPO Act enables Treasury-side mobilisation independently |
 
-### Where Sweden **innovates**, **follows**, **diverges**
+#### Where Sweden **innovates**, **follows**, **diverges**
 
 | Stance | Detail |
 |--------|--------|
@@ -1656,7 +1644,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Macroeconomic Context (World Bank, OECD, Eurostat)
+### 📊 Macroeconomic Context (World Bank, OECD, Eurostat)
 
 | Metric | SE 2024 | SE 2023 | Nordic peers | EU-27 | Source |
 |--------|:-------:|:-------:|:------------:|:-----:|:------:|
@@ -1669,7 +1657,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 
 ---
 
-## 🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrated Verdict
+### 🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrated Verdict
 
 | Dimension | SE posture 1219 | Peer median | Delta |
 |-----------|-----------------|-------------|:-----:|
@@ -1683,7 +1671,7 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Confidence & Limitations
+### ⚠️ Confidence & Limitations
 
 1. **HD03232 contribution numbers** are extrapolations from GDP shares; no Commission secretariat cost model has been published — estimates carry ±100% error bar.
 2. **RSF index 2025 values** are preliminary; final release typically September; rankings may shift ±2 positions.
@@ -1695,15 +1683,14 @@ The panel is constructed per cluster:
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-05-15 · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 8 (International benchmarking — ≥ 5 jurisdictions per cluster)
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md -->
 
 **CLS-ID**: CLS-20260419-1219  
 **Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling  
 **Version**: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)
 
-## Sensitivity Decision Framework
+### Sensitivity Decision Framework
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1726,7 +1713,7 @@ graph TD
     style H fill:#44aa44,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Per-Document Classification
+### Per-Document Classification
 
 | dok_id | Priority | Classification | Retention | Offentlighetsprincipen | Reasoning |
 |--------|----------|---------------|-----------|----------------------|-----------|
@@ -1736,7 +1723,7 @@ graph TD
 | HD03232 | **P1 Critical** | Public — Full Analysis | 7 years | Public | International treaty, international law institution |
 | HD01CU28 | **P2 Sector** | Public — Sector Summary | 5 years | Public | Property rights reform; market transparency |
 
-## Political Temperature Assessment
+### Political Temperature Assessment
 
 | Document | Temperature | Trend | Parties in conflict |
 |----------|------------|-------|---------------------|
@@ -1746,12 +1733,12 @@ graph TD
 | HD03232 | 🌡️ HIGH (7/10) | Rising | Same as HD03231 |
 | CU28 | 🌡️ LOW (3/10) | Stable | Housing industry concerns but broad agreement |
 
-## Strategic Significance
+### Strategic Significance
 
 - **KU33**: First-reading passage of a constitutional amendment means Sweden has made an irreversible (until next election) commitment to narrow offentlighetsprincipen for law enforcement materials. If the riksdag elected in September 2026 confirms the amendment, it takes effect January 2027 — within 9 months.
 - **Ukraine Package**: Simultaneous accession to both the Special Tribunal for Aggression AND the Compensation Commission represents a comprehensive legal-accountability commitment to Ukraine, coinciding with the King's visit to Kyiv (2026-04-17). Globally only ≈40 states have joined the tribunal; Sweden's accession is norm-entrepreneurship with historical significance.
 
-## Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)
+### Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)
 
 | Priority | Retention period | Legal basis | Access rule |
 |:--------:|:---------------:|-------------|-------------|
@@ -1760,13 +1747,13 @@ graph TD
 | P2 Sector | 5 years | OSL 2009:400 chap 39 — normal sector-policy retention | Public — sector summary published |
 | P3 Routine | 2 years | Allmän retention | Internal only |
 
-## Access Rules
+### Access Rules
 
 - **All P0/P1 analysis files** are published under the Riksdagsmonitor public-transparency commitment — no redactions.
 - **Per-document files in `documents/`** are considered reference-grade intelligence artefacts; they should be preserved for minimum 10 years (P0) or 7 years (P1).
 - **Upstream data dependencies** (riksdagen.se + regeringen.se + World Bank + SCB) are referenced via permanent dok_id URLs — no data copied into the repository beyond what appears in analysis text.
 
-## Cross-Reference to Classification Doctrine
+### Cross-Reference to Classification Doctrine
 
 This run's classification decisions align with Hack23 ISMS `CLASSIFICATION.md` for CIA triad impact:
 
@@ -1781,15 +1768,14 @@ This run's classification decisions align with Hack23 ISMS `CLASSIFICATION.md` f
 No CIA-triad rating change is proposed by this run; existing `CLASSIFICATION.md` baseline holds.
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **XRF-ID**: XRF-20260419-1219  
 **Date**: 2026-04-19  
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling  
 **Version**: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)
 
-## Document Relationships
+### Document Relationships
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1813,7 +1799,7 @@ graph TD
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Forward Chain — Links to Prior Runs
+### Forward Chain — Links to Prior Runs
 
 | Prior dok_id | Prior Run | Link to This Run | Type |
 |-------------|-----------|-----------------|------|
@@ -1823,13 +1809,13 @@ graph TD
 | HD03220 (NATO Finland) | Earlier run | Ukraine security architecture; HD03231 completes legal layer | Direct link |
 | HD01UFöU3 (NATO Finland bet) | 2026-04-13 | Committee approval of NATO contribution; context for Ukraine propositions | Context |
 
-## Continuity Contracts
+### Continuity Contracts
 
 - **KU33 monitoring contract**: This run creates monitoring obligation to track: (a) chamber vote 2026-04-22, (b) any opposition amendments, (c) Lagrådet opinion if published, (d) second reading timeline post-September 2026 election.
 - **Ukraine package monitoring contract**: Track UU committee referral of HD03231/232; expected UU betänkande within 8-10 weeks; vote likely before summer recess.
 - **Housing registry tracking**: CU28 implementation — Lantmäteriet capacity assessment Q3 2026.
 
-## Inter-Document Pattern Analysis
+### Inter-Document Pattern Analysis
 
 **Pattern 1 — Constitutional Double-Move**: KU32 (media accessibility, EU compliance) and KU33 (seizure secrecy, law enforcement) are both grundlag amendments in the same riksmöte. While superficially different in purpose, their simultaneous passage establishes a precedent that grundlag modification is a normal legislative tool. This is historically unusual — Sweden has traditionally treated grundlag amendments with extreme caution.
 
@@ -1837,7 +1823,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Pattern 3 — Property Market Anti-Crime Reform**: CU28 (national housing register) + HD01CU27 (lagfart identity) + HD03233 (telecoms fraud, from April 14) form a coordinated anti-financial-crime package, consistent with the Kristersson government's emphasis on law and order across multiple domains.
 
-## Timeline Spine — Parliamentary Journey of Lead Clusters
+### Timeline Spine — Parliamentary Journey of Lead Clusters
 
 ```mermaid
 timeline
@@ -1858,7 +1844,7 @@ timeline
     2027-01-01 : KU33 + KU32 effect date (if confirmed)
 ```
 
-## Continuity Contract Register
+### Continuity Contract Register
 
 Every open forward watchpoint created by this run is tracked in the central continuity register:
 
@@ -1872,7 +1858,7 @@ Every open forward watchpoint created by this run is tracked in the central cont
 | CC-ELECTION-2026 | Swedish general election impact on KU33 | weekly-review + month-ahead | 2026-09-13 result | Post-election run |
 | CC-CU28-IMPL | CU28 implementation capacity | realtime-monitor | Lantmäteriet Q3 2026 capacity assessment | Weekly-review |
 
-## Cross-Reference to Upstream Exemplar
+### Cross-Reference to Upstream Exemplar
 
 This run extends the **reference-grade exemplar structure** introduced by [`analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/). Pattern reuse:
 
@@ -1890,8 +1876,7 @@ Where 1219 **diverges** from 1434:
 - 1219 scenario-analysis shifts probability slightly toward Scenario C because of emergent HD03232 cost uncertainty
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **MTH-ID**: MTH-20260419-1219
 **Date**: 2026-04-19
@@ -1901,7 +1886,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Methodology Application Matrix
+### 1. Methodology Application Matrix
 
 The guide `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 specifies eight rules. This run's application of each:
 
@@ -1920,7 +1905,7 @@ The guide `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 specifies ei
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence
+### 2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence
 
 | File | Pass-1 size (bytes) | Pass-2 size (bytes) | Gain | Improvements |
 |------|--------------------:|--------------------:|-----:|--------------|
@@ -1947,11 +1932,11 @@ The guide `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 specifies ei
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation
+### 3. Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation
 
 This section reconciles **every forward indicator** issued in sibling runs over the last 5 days (2026-04-14 → 2026-04-19) and states its disposition in 1219. Dispositions: **Carried forward** · **Retired** · **Carried with reduced priority**.
 
-### Sibling runs reviewed
+#### Sibling runs reviewed
 
 | Run | Path | Key watchpoints sampled |
 |-----|------|-------------------------|
@@ -1961,7 +1946,7 @@ This section reconciles **every forward indicator** issued in sibling runs over
 | 2026-04-17 | `analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/` | KU32/KU33 first-reading prep; Ukraine royal-visit signal |
 | 2026-04-18 | `analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/`, `weekly-review/` | Vårproposition; HD03246; September election scenario priors |
 
-### Reconciliation table
+#### Reconciliation table
 
 | # | Upstream Source | Watchpoint | Disposition in 1219 | Reason |
 |:-:|----------------|-----------|---------------------|--------|
@@ -1986,7 +1971,7 @@ This section reconciles **every forward indicator** issued in sibling runs over
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots
+### 4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots
 
 | Dimension | Uncertainty source | Effect on conclusions | Mitigation |
 |-----------|-------------------|----------------------|-----------|
@@ -1998,7 +1983,7 @@ This section reconciles **every forward indicator** issued in sibling runs over
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Known Limitations of This Run
+### 5. Known Limitations of This Run
 
 1. **No primary Swedish-language interview sourcing** — all claims rely on published Riksdag documents, regeringen.se press releases, and secondary academic/NGO material. This is a structural limit of agentic workflow operation.
 2. **Lagrådet yttrande had not been published** at run time (2026-04-19 12:19 UTC) — scenario probabilities must be updated when it is.
@@ -2008,7 +1993,7 @@ This section reconciles **every forward indicator** issued in sibling runs over
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Probability-Alignment Audit
+### 6. Probability-Alignment Audit
 
 | Metric | 1219 value | Upstream anchor | Delta | Justified by |
 |--------|:----------:|:---------------:|:-----:|-------------|
@@ -2023,7 +2008,7 @@ This section reconciles **every forward indicator** issued in sibling runs over
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Recommendations for Doctrine Codification
+### 7. Recommendations for Doctrine Codification
 
 These recommendations are proposed for merge into `.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md` and `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`:
 
@@ -2040,7 +2025,7 @@ These recommendations are proposed for merge into `.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATT
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 8. Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Claim | Evidence | Confidence |
 |-------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -2055,7 +2040,7 @@ These recommendations are proposed for merge into `.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATT
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Recommended Next-Review Triggers
+### 9. Recommended Next-Review Triggers
 
 Trigger a new synthesis for this cluster if any of the following occur within 14 days:
 
@@ -2071,10 +2056,9 @@ Trigger a new synthesis for this cluster if any of the following occur within 14
 **Classification**: Public · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 §Rule 7 (self-audit) + §Rule 8 (international benchmarking) · **Next review**: 2026-05-01
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md)_
-
-## Documents Analyzed
+### Documents Analyzed
 
 **Total**: 5 primary documents + 3 supporting government sources
 
@@ -2086,7 +2070,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03232 | proposition | UD | Sveriges tillträde till konventionen om internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina | 2026-04-16 | P1 (Critical) |
 | HD01CU28 | betänkande | CU | Ett register för alla bostadsrätter | 2026-04-17 | P2 (Sector) |
 
-## Supporting Sources
+### Supporting Sources
 
 | Source | Type | Relevance |
 |--------|------|-----------|
@@ -2095,22 +2079,22 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | World Bank SWE GDP Growth 2024 | Economic data | GDP growth 0.82% (2024), down from 5.2% in 2021 |
 | World Bank SWE Inflation 2024 | Economic data | Inflation 2.836% (2024), down from 8.5% in 2023 |
 
-## Data Freshness
+### Data Freshness
 
 - **Riksdag data**: Live as of 2026-04-19T12:19:53Z (status: "live")
 - **Government data**: g0v.se last synced within 24h
 - **World Bank**: Most recent available (2024 values)
 
-## Previous Run Coverage
+### Previous Run Coverage
 
 The previous realtime run (2026-04-18 1705) covered: HD03100, HD03236, HD03246, HD01SfU22, HD0399. All 5 documents in this run are NEW (not previously covered).
 
-## Methodology
+### Methodology
 
 AI-driven analysis following `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1.
 Per-document depth tiers: KU33 (L3), KU32 (L2+), HD03231+HD03232 (L2+), CU28 (L2).
 
-## Chain-of-Custody Manifest
+### Chain-of-Custody Manifest
 
 | # | Source | URL / Reference | Accessed | Fetched via | Caching | Integrity |
 |:-:|--------|-----------------|----------|-------------|---------|-----------|
@@ -2123,14 +2107,14 @@ Per-document depth tiers: KU33 (L3), KU32 (L2+), HD03231+HD03232 (L2+), CU28 (L2
 | 7 | World Bank — Sweden GDP growth 2024 | https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG | 2026-04-19T12:21Z | world-bank-mcp | Session cache | JSON valid |
 | 8 | World Bank — Sweden CPI 2024 | https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG | 2026-04-19T12:21Z | world-bank-mcp | Session cache | JSON valid |
 
-## Provenance Integrity Rules
+### Provenance Integrity Rules
 
 - All riksdag-regering-mcp calls use HTTPS transport to https://riksdag-regering-ai.onrender.com/mcp with proxy allowlist enforcement.
 - World Bank data retrieved via worldbank-mcp (container `node:25-alpine` per `.github/workflows/news-realtime-monitor.lock.yml` mcp-servers block).
 - No personal data (PII) is cached; all fetched content is official public record.
 - Cache retention: session-scoped only (per agent run); no persistent storage of external data in the repository.
 
-## Document-Quality Rating
+### Document-Quality Rating
 
 | Document | Quality rating | Completeness | Primary-source confidence |
 |----------|:-------------:|:------------:|:-------------------------:|
@@ -2142,7 +2126,7 @@ Per-document depth tiers: KU33 (L3), KU32 (L2+), HD03231+HD03232 (L2+), CU28 (L2
 | Regeringen.se presser (King Kyiv) | Government press release | Full | HIGH |
 | World Bank GDP / CPI | Public API | Full | HIGH |
 
-## Coverage-Completeness Attestation
+### Coverage-Completeness Attestation
 
 All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5.0 appear in the published article with dedicated H2/H3 sections:
 
@@ -2152,3 +2136,24 @@ All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5.0 appear in the published article with d
 - ✅ HD01CU28 (5.93) — H3 under "Sector updates"
 
 All per-document files exist at the declared depth tier. See `methodology-reflection.md` §Pass-1 → Pass-2 improvement evidence for the reference-grade-extension audit.
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/article.md
index cab807a985..2fd20b7e0d 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-20
 subfolder: evening-analysis
 slug: 2026-04-20-evening-analysis
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.864Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.660Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -22,14 +22,13 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Classification**: PUBLIC | **Produced by**: news-evening-analysis
 
 ---
 
-## BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)
+### BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)
 
 Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's pre-election parliamentary accountability campaign. The Riksdag's Environment and Agriculture Committee (MJU) published a committee report (HD01MJU21) on the National Audit Office's finding that **Sweden's state efforts for agricultural climate transition are insufficient** — a legally binding finding from an independent constitutional body that joins the government's controversial fuel tax cut (HD03236) to create a two-source, independently verified climate credibility challenge going into the September 13, 2026 election.
 
@@ -41,7 +40,7 @@ The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation stru
 
 ---
 
-## 60-Second Read (8 Bullets)
+### 60-Second Read (8 Bullets)
 
 - 🌾 **Riksrevisionen finds Sweden's agricultural climate transition insufficient** (HD01MJU21) — independent finding joins fuel tax cut as two-front climate challenge
 - 👮 **S targets Stockholm police shortage** (HD10439: Vepsä → Strömmer) — BRÅ confirmed numbers but distribution gaps remain in capital
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation stru
 
 ---
 
-## 3 Decisions Supported
+### 3 Decisions Supported
 
 1. **Government response strategy**: Justice Minister Strömmer should proactively link HD03237 (paid police training) to HD10439's Stockholm concerns in his response — turning S's question into a government implementation story
 2. **Agricultural climate action**: Climate/Agriculture Ministry should announce an agricultural SOU or consultation process within 30 days to transform MJU21 from a liability into a demonstrated response
@@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation stru
 
 ---
 
-## Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)
+### Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)
 
 | # | Risk | L×I | Timeline |
 |---|------|:---:|:--------:|
@@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation stru
 
 ---
 
-## Named Actors Today
+### Named Actors Today
 
 | Actor | Party/Role | Relevance |
 |-------|-----------|---------|
@@ -89,7 +88,7 @@ The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation stru
 
 ---
 
-## Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)
+### Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)
 
 - **KU deliberations**: KU42 and KU43 move toward plenary scheduling
 - **MJU21 media response**: Watch DN/SvD morning editions for Riksrevisionen agricultural climate coverage
@@ -98,8 +97,7 @@ The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation stru
 - **EU Summit context**: EU-SUMMIT-20260422 (from realtime memory) — Swedish government positioning on climate/security
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <img src="https://hack23.com/icon-192.png" alt="Hack23 Logo" width="96" height="96">
@@ -114,7 +112,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 📋 Synthesis Metadata
+### 📋 Synthesis Metadata
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -129,7 +127,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Intelligence Dashboard
+### 📊 Intelligence Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -156,7 +154,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings
+### 🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings
 
 | Rank | Finding | Source | Significance | Confidence | Electoral Impact |
 |:----:|---------|--------|:------------:|:----------:|:----------------:|
@@ -168,7 +166,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Document Significance Ranking
+### 📈 Document Significance Ranking
 
 | Rank | Dok ID | Committee | Title | Score | Tier | Key Driver |
 |:----:|--------|:---------:|-------|:-----:|:----:|------------|
@@ -182,51 +180,51 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔍 Cross-Document Patterns
+### 🔍 Cross-Document Patterns
 
-### Theme 1: S Accountability Offensive — Constitutional Week
+#### Theme 1: S Accountability Offensive — Constitutional Week
 
 **Confidence: 🟩HIGH** — Reading the day's document flow alongside the week's earlier motions and interpellations, a unified picture emerges: the Social Democrats are running a disciplined, coordinated parliamentary accountability campaign. The August calendar shows S's full-session filing rate has accelerated by ~50% since April 14 (interpellation analysis). Monday April 20's 8 written questions span: infrastructure (Minister Carlson, who faces 6th+ interpellation), energy (alum shale, Minister Busch/Britz), justice (Minister Strömmer, also facing new interpellation HD10439), and constitutional education (Minister Mohammso). No portfolio is left unchallenged.
 
 **Electoral logic**: S is exploiting a "records matter" strategy — each written question creates a timestamped parliamentary exchange before the summer recess. Any non-committal or weak ministerial response becomes usable September-campaign material. The constitutional knowledge question (HD11726) is especially strategically timed: one week after two constitutional amendments (KU33/KU32) passed "vilande", demanding constitutional competence answers from the Education Minister while the government champions constitutional reform is a neat rhetorical trap.
 
-### Theme 2: Climate Credibility Gap Widens
+#### Theme 2: Climate Credibility Gap Widens
 
 **Confidence: 🟩HIGH** — MJU21 (Riksrevisionen on agricultural climate) and HD11725 (alum shale municipal veto) together reinforce the opposition's central Spring 2026 climate narrative established in the motions analysis: the government is simultaneously cutting fuel taxes (HD03236, adding +0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e) and now found to have insufficient agricultural climate transition plans. Agriculture represents ~14% of Sweden's domestic GHG emissions; the Riksrevisionen finding adds a third front of climate accountability to fuel taxes and energy policy.
 
-### Theme 3: Police Quality vs. Quantity Tension
+#### Theme 3: Police Quality vs. Quantity Tension
 
 **Confidence: 🟧MEDIUM** — HD10439 targets Justice Minister Strömmer on the BRÅ evaluation of the 10,000 police officer goal. The BRÅ evaluation confirms the numerical target was reached — but S's framing targets Stockholm-specific distribution failures and quality/deployment issues. This is a sophisticated challenge: the government can defend the headline number while S attacks its operational implementation. The argument is rendered more complex because HD03237 (paid police training) — part of today's sibling proposition package — is precisely the government's answer to recruitment constraints. S is attacking a problem the government claims to have already solved.
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Aggregated SWOT
+### 📊 Aggregated SWOT
 
-### Strengths (Coalition/Government)
+#### Strengths (Coalition/Government)
 - Police 10,000 target met (BRÅ confirmed) — defensible headline number
 - KU42 debate shows constitutional transparency commitment
 - KU43 modernisation demonstrates legislative housekeeping competence
 - Energy reform pipeline (HD03240/39/38) provides forward counter-narrative to climate attacks
 
-### Weaknesses (Coalition/Government)
+#### Weaknesses (Coalition/Government)
 - MJU21/Riksrevisionen finding on agricultural climate is legally on the record — difficult to dismiss
 - Stockholm police distribution gap (HD10439) cannot be erased by numerical targets
 - Minister Carlson (infrastructure) remains most-targeted minister — KD portfolio vulnerability
 - 8 ministerial portfolios challenged in a single day; bandwidth pressure on government responses
 
-### Opportunities (Coalition/Government)
+#### Opportunities (Coalition/Government)
 - KU42 budget structure debate allows government to showcase fiscal responsibility narrative
 - Linking HD03237 (paid police training) proactively to HD10439 concerns would turn S's question into a government success story
 - Agricultural climate: announce SOU or action plan within 30 days to neutralise Riksrevisionen finding
 
-### Threats (Coalition/Government)
+#### Threats (Coalition/Government)
 - S's "constitutional knowledge" question (HD11726) creates a rhetorical trap right as vilande amendments are debated
 - Alum shale veto (HD11725) exposes energy-environment incoherence — C+S aligned against SD
 - S's accelerating filing pace suggests a week-3 interpellation surge likely late April
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Landscape
+### ⚠️ Risk Landscape
 
 | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | L×I | Confidence |
 |------|:----------:|:------:|:---:|:----------:|
@@ -238,7 +236,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Forward Indicators
+### 🔭 Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Timeline | Confidence |
 |-----------|---------|---------|:----------:|
@@ -250,7 +248,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗂️ Artifacts Inventory
+### 🗂️ Artifacts Inventory
 
 | # | Artifact | File | Status |
 |---|---------|------|--------|
@@ -270,15 +268,14 @@ graph TD
 | 14 | Methodology Reflection | methodology-reflection.md | ✅ |
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **SIG ID**: `SIG-2026-04-20-EVE001`
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 17:37 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## Significance Scoring Framework (5 Dimensions × 5 Points)
+### Significance Scoring Framework (5 Dimensions × 5 Points)
 
 | Dimension | Weight | Description |
 |-----------|:------:|-------------|
@@ -290,9 +287,9 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Per-Document Scoring
+### Per-Document Scoring
 
-### HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning
+#### HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning
 
 | Dimension | Score (1–5) | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----------:|---------|
@@ -306,7 +303,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### HD10439 — Brist på poliser i Stockholm (interpellation)
+#### HD10439 — Brist på poliser i Stockholm (interpellation)
 
 | Dimension | Score (1–5) | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----------:|---------|
@@ -320,7 +317,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### HD01KU42 — Indelning i utgiftsområden (committee report)
+#### HD01KU42 — Indelning i utgiftsområden (committee report)
 
 | Dimension | Score (1–5) | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----------:|---------|
@@ -334,7 +331,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### HD11726 — Kunskap om grundlagarna (question)
+#### HD11726 — Kunskap om grundlagarna (question)
 
 | Dimension | Score (1–5) | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----------:|---------|
@@ -348,7 +345,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### Collective Written Questions (HD11720–11727)
+#### Collective Written Questions (HD11720–11727)
 
 | Dimension | Score (1–5) | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----------:|---------|
@@ -362,7 +359,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Overall Evening Analysis Significance Summary
+### Overall Evening Analysis Significance Summary
 
 **Composite Score (weighted)**: 74/100
 **Publication Tier**: TIER-2 (High importance, immediate publication)
@@ -372,15 +369,14 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 **Election 2026 Relevance**: HIGH 🟩 — climate, security, constitutional accountability all live election issues
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **STA ID**: `STA-2026-04-20-EVE001`
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 17:38 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## Impact Radar
+### Impact Radar
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -405,9 +401,9 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Stakeholder Analysis — All 8 Groups
+### Stakeholder Analysis — All 8 Groups
 
-### 1. Citizens
+#### 1. Citizens
 **Impact Level**: HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate–Election 2026 | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 **Analysis**: Monday's parliamentary activity touches three of the top voter concerns: security (police), environment (agricultural climate), and infrastructure (Carlson's portfolio). The HD10439 Stockholm police interpellation directly affects the 970,000 Stockholm municipality residents who experience the policing gap daily. The MJU21 agricultural climate finding affects both urban consumers (food prices, sustainability expectations) and rural citizens (farming communities). HD11726's constitutional knowledge question affects all 7.7 million eligible voters ahead of the first "constitutional election" in modern Swedish history.
@@ -420,7 +416,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (M-KD-L, supported by SD)
+#### 2. Government Coalition (M-KD-L, supported by SD)
 **Impact Level**: HIGH (adverse) | **Timeline**: Immediate | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 **Actor-specific analysis**:
@@ -434,7 +430,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)
 **Impact Level**: HIGH (positive) | **Timeline**: Immediate | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 **Actor-specific analysis**:
@@ -447,7 +443,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### 4. Business/Industry
+#### 4. Business/Industry
 **Impact Level**: MEDIUM | **Timeline**: Medium-term | **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
 - **Farming sector** (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund, LRF): MJU21 agricultural climate transition — mixed. Riksrevisionen finding documents state insufficiency, which LRF will use to argue for better government support rather than regulatory pressure
@@ -458,7 +454,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### 5. Civil Society
+#### 5. Civil Society
 **Impact Level**: HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate–Medium | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 - **Environmental NGOs** (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF): MJU21 agricultural climate finding = major advocacy victory; validates campaigns against agricultural emissions
@@ -468,7 +464,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### 6. International/EU
+#### 6. International/EU
 **Impact Level**: LOW-MEDIUM | **Timeline**: Medium | **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
 - **EU Commission**: MJU21 agricultural climate — Sweden's Riksrevisionen finding will be noted in EU's review of member-state CAP compliance and climate transition progress
@@ -478,7 +474,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional
+#### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional
 **Impact Level**: HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 - **Riksrevisionen**: MJU21 is its own finding — the constitutional body will monitor government response; if no action within 6 months, can escalate
@@ -488,7 +484,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### 8. Media/Public Opinion
+#### 8. Media/Public Opinion
 **Impact Level**: HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 **Expected media framing**:
@@ -503,16 +499,15 @@ graph LR
 - Constitutional awareness: Only 34% of Swedes can name all five fundamental laws (Demoskop 2024) — HD11726 identifies a real gap
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Horizon**: Tomorrow / 7-day / 30-day
 
 ---
 
-## Three Base Scenarios
+### Three Base Scenarios
 
-### Scenario A: Government Containment (35% probability)
+#### Scenario A: Government Containment (35% probability)
 **Label**: "Strömmer Responds, Svantesson Pivots"
 **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
@@ -527,7 +522,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario B: S Accountability Gains Traction (50% probability)
+#### Scenario B: S Accountability Gains Traction (50% probability)
 **Label**: "The Double Climate Indictment"
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
@@ -543,7 +538,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario C: Constitutional Accountability Week (15% probability)
+#### Scenario C: Constitutional Accountability Week (15% probability)
 **Label**: "Four Documents, One Theme: Who Controls the State?"
 **Confidence**: 🟥LOW-MEDIUM
 
@@ -558,9 +553,9 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Two Wildcards
+### Two Wildcards
 
-### Wildcard 1: Klimatpolitiska rådet Rapid Response
+#### Wildcard 1: Klimatpolitiska rådet Rapid Response
 **Probability**: 0.25 | **Impact if realised**: 🔴CRITICAL
 
 The independent climate policy council issues an urgent statement on the MJU21 + fuel tax cut combination within 7 days. This would:
@@ -570,14 +565,14 @@ The independent climate policy council issues an urgent statement on the MJU21 +
 
 ---
 
-### Wildcard 2: KU Summons Reveal Sensitive Budget Documents
+#### Wildcard 2: KU Summons Reveal Sensitive Budget Documents
 **Probability**: 0.20 | **Impact if realised**: 🟠HIGH
 
 The KU summons of Finance Minister Svantesson (flagged in realtime memory for this week) produces unexpected revelations about budgetary decision-making processes. If Svantesson's testimony on the Spring Economic Bill (HD03100) or the extra amendment budget (HD03236) reveals internal disagreements or rushed decision-making, the climate-fiscal accountability narrative widens.
 
 ---
 
-## ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses
+### ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses
 
 | Hypothesis | Scenario A | Scenario B | Scenario C |
 |-----------|:----------:|:----------:|:----------:|
@@ -589,7 +584,7 @@ The KU summons of Finance Minister Svantesson (flagged in realtime memory for th
 
 ---
 
-## 30-Day Forward Indicators
+### 30-Day Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Expected Date | Significance |
 |-----------|:------------:|:------------:|
@@ -601,8 +596,7 @@ The KU summons of Finance Minister Svantesson (flagged in realtime memory for th
 | EU Commission climate review | May–June | Sweden's CAP compliance assessment |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **RSK ID**: `RSK-2026-04-20-EVE001`
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 17:34 UTC
@@ -610,7 +604,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Heat Map
+### Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -633,9 +627,9 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Register
+### Risk Register
 
-### Risk 1: Riksrevisionen Agricultural Climate Finding Escalation
+#### Risk 1: Riksrevisionen Agricultural Climate Finding Escalation
 **Risk ID**: RSK-EA-001
 **Category**: Policy/Regulatory
 **Source**: HD01MJU21 (MJU21 committee report)
@@ -654,7 +648,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-### Risk 2: S Stockholm Police Narrative Gains Media Traction
+#### Risk 2: S Stockholm Police Narrative Gains Media Traction
 **Risk ID**: RSK-EA-002
 **Category**: Political/Reputational
 **Source**: HD10439 (interpellation by Mattias Vepsä, S → Gunnar Strömmer, M)
@@ -673,7 +667,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-### Risk 3: S Interpellation Surge Week 3 (Late April)
+#### Risk 3: S Interpellation Surge Week 3 (Late April)
 **Risk ID**: RSK-EA-003
 **Category**: Political/Parliamentary
 **Source**: Pattern analysis — motions (21 in 6 days), interpellations (7 in 6 days), questions (8 today)
@@ -692,7 +686,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-### Risk 4: Coalition Energy/Environment Fracture on Alum Shale
+#### Risk 4: Coalition Energy/Environment Fracture on Alum Shale
 **Risk ID**: RSK-EA-004
 **Category**: Coalition Stability
 **Source**: HD11725 (question on municipal veto on alum shale mining)
@@ -709,7 +703,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-### Risk 5: Constitutional Knowledge Trap (HD11726)
+#### Risk 5: Constitutional Knowledge Trap (HD11726)
 **Risk ID**: RSK-EA-005
 **Category**: Reputational/Institutional
 **Source**: HD11726 (question on Kunskap om grundlagarna by Eva Lindh, S → Education Minister Mohammso)
@@ -726,7 +720,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Stability Risk Assessment
+### Coalition Stability Risk Assessment
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -748,8 +742,7 @@ graph LR
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **SWOT ID**: `SWT-2026-04-20-EVE001`
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 17:33 UTC
@@ -757,7 +750,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Quadrant Mapping
+### Quadrant Mapping
 
 ```mermaid
 mindmap
@@ -824,55 +817,54 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition SWOT (Tidö: M-KD-L, supported by SD)
+### Coalition SWOT (Tidö: M-KD-L, supported by SD)
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 - **Police delivery**: BRÅ confirmed 10,000 officers target met — rare example of government delivering on a precise numerical commitment. Strömmer can invoke this against HD10439 `[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]`
 - **Energy reform package**: The sibling proposition analysis confirms HD03239/240/238 deliver a coherent industrial policy — positive contrast to the climate-only narrative opposition prefers `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 - **NATO credibility**: HD03220 (EFP Finland) and Ukraine accountability measures (HD03231/32) place Sweden firmly in the mainstream European security architecture `[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]`
 - **Fiscal package**: Three budget propositions (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236) provide election-year economic narrative `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 - **Agricultural climate**: MJU21/Riksrevisionen creates an official record that cannot be redacted. Agriculture = 14% of domestic GHG; documented insufficiency joins fuel tax cut as climate credibility damage `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 - **Stockholm policing**: Quantitative goal vs qualitative/geographic distribution gap — S's framing exposes the limitation of headline-number politics `[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]`
 - **KD infrastructure**: Carlson's portfolio is consistently identified as weakest in coalition; KD cannot afford to lose further seats to M or S `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 - **Alum shale position**: SD's presumed support for mineral extraction puts it at odds with C (coalition-adjacent) and S on HD11725 — a microcosm of wider environmental coalition tension `[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]`
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 - **Agricultural action plan**: A rapid announcement of an SOU or consultation process would transform MJU21 from a liability to a response. Window is April 20–May 10 before Riksdag recess discussions begin `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 - **Constitutional leadership**: KU42 debate on budget structure — if the government champions transparent fiscal architecture, it takes the lead narrative away from opposition `[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]`
 - **Police quality follow-up**: Address Stockholm distribution concern proactively in Strömmer's HD10439 response — cite HD03237 as the structural solution `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 - **Klimatpolitiska rådet escalation**: The council is independent; MJU21 finding likely triggers a council review comment in May–June 2026, amplifying the damage `[MEDIUM-HIGH confidence 🟧]`
 - **HD11726 constitutional trap**: The Education Ministry will have to answer "what is being done to increase constitutional knowledge among citizens?" — any weak answer will be weaponised as the vilande amendments make the constitution a live election issue `[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]`
 - **S filing momentum**: The week-over-week escalation in S's parliamentary activity (motions, interpellations, written questions) is structurally concerning — Riksdag summer recess approaches, each filed question locks in a ministerial record `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 
 ---
 
-## Opposition SWOT (S + V + MP + C)
+### Opposition SWOT (S + V + MP + C)
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 - **Documented government failures**: MJU21 provides an independent audit authority's finding — more durable than political accusations `[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]`
 - **Coordinated accountability campaign**: S's simultaneous coverage of infrastructure, justice, energy, education, and climate demonstrates portfolio breadth that suggests S is ready to govern `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 - **Climate narrative coherence**: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) + agricultural climate failure (MJU21) + MJU25 (forthcoming) = a layered, multi-front climate case `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 - **S silent on deportation** (from motions analysis): S's revealed strategic choice to avoid the security-enforcement immigration narrative limits coalition-building credibility on the right `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 - **V+MP electoral risk**: Their arms-export and immigration positions poll poorly with median voter `[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]`
 - **S must own economic failure too**: Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth and 8.69% unemployment happened under conditions S did not fully prevent when in government 2014–2022 `[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]`
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 - **MJU21 amplification**: Bring Riksrevisionen finding to media at first plenary debate opportunity `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 - **HD11726 timing**: Constitutional knowledge debate immediately post-vilande amendments is symbolically perfect for S `[HIGH confidence 🟩]`
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 - **Government pays its debts**: If Strömmer, Carlson, and other ministers respond substantively to the written question wave, the accountability saturation tactic loses impact `[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]`
 - **Election fatigue**: Voters may tune out escalating accountability campaigns if not tied to vivid personal stories `[LOW confidence 🟥]`
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **THR ID**: `THR-2026-04-20-EVE001`
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 17:35 UTC
@@ -880,7 +872,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Taxonomy Network
+### Threat Taxonomy Network
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -908,9 +900,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Category Analysis
+### Threat Category Analysis
 
-### Category 1: Constitutional Threats
+#### Category 1: Constitutional Threats
 **Severity**: 3/5 | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 | Threat | Source | Severity | Probability | Timeline |
@@ -923,7 +915,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-### Category 2: Climate/Environment Threats
+#### Category 2: Climate/Environment Threats
 **Severity**: 4/5 | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 | Threat | Source | Severity | Probability | Timeline |
@@ -936,7 +928,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-### Category 3: Security/Rule of Law Threats
+#### Category 3: Security/Rule of Law Threats
 **Severity**: 3/5 | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 | Threat | Source | Severity | Probability | Timeline |
@@ -949,7 +941,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-### Category 4: Economic Threats
+#### Category 4: Economic Threats
 **Severity**: 4/5 | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 | Threat | Source | Severity | Probability | Timeline |
@@ -962,7 +954,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-### Category 5: Coalition Stability Threats
+#### Category 5: Coalition Stability Threats
 **Severity**: 3/5 | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 | Threat | Source | Severity | Probability | Timeline |
@@ -973,7 +965,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-### Category 6: Democratic Integrity Threats
+#### Category 6: Democratic Integrity Threats
 **Severity**: 2/5 | **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
 | Threat | Source | Severity | Probability | Timeline |
@@ -985,27 +977,26 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Overall Threat Assessment
+### Overall Threat Assessment
 
 **Confidence level**: Threat near MEDIUM-HIGH (2026-04-20 evening)
 
 The dominant threat cluster is the **climate accountability compound** (MJU21 + HD03236 + HD11725) — independently verified, multi-front, and aligned with three opposition parties (S, MP, C). The secondary threat is the **parliamentary saturation campaign** — S's escalating filing pace is structurally asymmetric in that the government must respond to every question while S pays no cost for filing.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Overview
+### Overview
 
 Today's Swedish parliamentary activity — Riksrevisionen agricultural climate failure, police quality accountability, and constitutional scrutiny — has direct parallels across Nordic and EU peers.
 
 ---
 
-## Jurisdiction Benchmarks
+### Jurisdiction Benchmarks
 
-### 1. Denmark 🇩🇰 — Agricultural Climate Transition (Lead Comparator)
+#### 1. Denmark 🇩🇰 — Agricultural Climate Transition (Lead Comparator)
 **Relevance**: HD01MJU21 agricultural climate findings
 
 Denmark is the most direct comparator for Sweden's agricultural climate challenge. In 2021, Denmark adopted the world's first comprehensive **agricultural climate plan**, including:
@@ -1019,7 +1010,7 @@ Denmark is the most direct comparator for Sweden's agricultural climate challeng
 
 ---
 
-### 2. Finland 🇫🇮 — Police Resource Distribution (Security Comparator)
+#### 2. Finland 🇫🇮 — Police Resource Distribution (Security Comparator)
 **Relevance**: HD10439 Stockholm police shortage
 
 Finland's police reform (2013–2016) provides a cautionary tale for Sweden's HD10439 situation. Finland merged 24 police districts into 11, **reducing operational presence in smaller cities while concentrating resources in Helsinki**. The result was: improved response times in Helsinki (+8%) but **rural policing deterioration** that required emergency reversal 2019–2021.
@@ -1032,7 +1023,7 @@ Sweden faces an analogous challenge: meeting the national 10,000-officer target
 
 ---
 
-### 3. Germany 🇩🇪 — Fuel Tax / Climate Hypocrisy Precedent
+#### 3. Germany 🇩🇪 — Fuel Tax / Climate Hypocrisy Precedent
 **Relevance**: HD03236 fuel tax + MJU21 compound
 
 Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt (fuel tax cut, €3 billion, June–August 2022) is the direct European precedent for Sweden's HD03236. Key findings:
@@ -1048,7 +1039,7 @@ Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt (fuel tax cut, €3 billion, June–August 2022) is th
 
 ---
 
-### 4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Constitutional Education Model
+#### 4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Constitutional Education Model
 **Relevance**: HD11726 constitutional knowledge question
 
 Norway has a relatively strong model for constitutional civic education. In connection with the 2014 bicentenary of the Norwegian constitution, Norway launched:
@@ -1064,7 +1055,7 @@ Norway has a relatively strong model for constitutional civic education. In conn
 
 ---
 
-### 5. Netherlands 🇳🇱 — Audit Authority Climate Escalation
+#### 5. Netherlands 🇳🇱 — Audit Authority Climate Escalation
 **Relevance**: MJU21 Riksrevisionen finding escalation risk
 
 The Netherlands' Algemene Rekenkamer (national audit court) issued a climate-transition finding in 2022 on agricultural emissions — and the institutional response provides a blueprint for Sweden:
@@ -1078,7 +1069,7 @@ The Netherlands' Algemene Rekenkamer (national audit court) issued a climate-tra
 
 ---
 
-### 6. EU Level — Pay Transparency Directive (Cross-Reference)
+#### 6. EU Level — Pay Transparency Directive (Cross-Reference)
 **Relevance**: From sibling interpellation analysis (IP437 — EU pay transparency directive failure)
 
 Sweden's documented failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970) on time is a compliance failure visible at EU level. The directive requires implementation by June 7, 2026. Sweden withdrew its implementation proposal (frs 2025/26:437 confirms). EU infringement proceedings typically take 12–18 months to reach formal decision — but the **political embarrassment** of being called out at EU institutions before September 13, 2026 is a live risk.
@@ -1089,7 +1080,7 @@ Sweden's documented failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023
 
 ---
 
-## Summary Scorecard
+### Summary Scorecard
 
 | Jurisdiction | Area | Sweden's Position | Gap |
 |-------------|------|:-----------------:|:---:|
@@ -1101,15 +1092,14 @@ Sweden's documented failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023
 | EU | Pay transparency | Non-compliant (rare) | Critical |
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md -->
 
 **CLS ID**: `CLS-2026-04-20-EVE001`
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 17:36 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## Sensitivity Decision Tree
+### Sensitivity Decision Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1130,7 +1120,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Per-Document Classification Table
+### Per-Document Classification Table
 
 | Dok ID | Type | Sensitivity | Policy Domain | Urgency | Significance | Publication |
 |--------|------|:-----------:|---------------|:-------:|:------------:|:-----------:|
@@ -1149,7 +1139,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Domain Classification
+### Domain Classification
 
 | Policy Domain | Documents | Weight | Election Relevance |
 |---------------|:---------:|:------:|:-----------------:|
@@ -1159,7 +1149,7 @@ graph TD
 | Infrastructure/Transport | HD11722, HD11723, HD11724 | 🟡 MEDIUM | 🟡 MEDIUM |
 | Rural/Agriculture/Energy | HD11721, HD11725 | 🟡 MEDIUM | 🟡 MEDIUM |
 
-## Urgency Classification
+### Urgency Classification
 
 **Critical (respond within 24h)**: None
 **High (respond within 48–72h)**: HD10439, HD01MJU21
@@ -1167,15 +1157,14 @@ graph TD
 **Low (routine response)**: HD01KU43, HD11720, HD11721, HD11723, HD11727
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **XRF ID**: `XRF-2026-04-20-EVE001`
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 17:39 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## Document Relationship Graph
+### Document Relationship Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1229,7 +1218,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-Reference Table
+### Cross-Reference Table
 
 | This Document | Related Document | Relationship | Source | Type |
 |---------------|-----------------|--------------|--------|------|
@@ -1246,30 +1235,30 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Thematic Clusters
+### Thematic Clusters
 
-### Cluster A: Climate-Accountability Compound
+#### Cluster A: Climate-Accountability Compound
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH | **Electoral Weight**: 🔴CRITICAL
 
 Connects: MJU21 (Riksrevisionen) ↔ HD03236 (fuel tax) ↔ MOT024082+98 (S+MP counter-motions) ↔ HD11725 (alum shale)
 
 This cluster represents the most structurally damaging accountability compound for the government. Three independently-sourced challenges to climate credibility, with an independent constitutional body (Riksrevisionen) as the primary anchor.
 
-### Cluster B: Police Security Debate
+#### Cluster B: Police Security Debate
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH | **Electoral Weight**: 🔴HIGH
 
 Connects: HD10439 (new IP) ↔ HD10437 (previous IP) ↔ HD03237 (paid training)
 
 The police security debate has been running since April 15. HD10439 adds Stockholm specificity — from "national police numbers" to "where are the police in Stockholm?"
 
-### Cluster C: Constitutional Awareness Chain
+#### Cluster C: Constitutional Awareness Chain
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH | **Electoral Weight**: 🟠HIGH
 
 Connects: KU33+KU32 vilande ↔ KU42 budget scrutiny ↔ HD11726 constitutional knowledge
 
 The constitutional awareness chain creates a coherent pre-election narrative: government is changing the constitution (KU33/KU32), managing the fiscal framework (KU42), but not educating citizens about what the constitution is (HD11726).
 
-### Cluster D: Infrastructure Carlson Accountability
+#### Cluster D: Infrastructure Carlson Accountability
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH | **Electoral Weight**: 🟠MEDIUM
 
 Connects: HD11722 ↔ HD11724 ↔ IP434 (sibling interpellation on housing starts)
@@ -1277,14 +1266,13 @@ Connects: HD11722 ↔ HD11724 ↔ IP434 (sibling interpellation on housing start
 S is maintaining consistent pressure on Infrastructure Minister Carlson across multiple parliamentary instruments. Written questions, interpellations — the approach is multi-layered.
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Analysis Version**: v5.0 | **Depth**: deep
 
 ---
 
-## Methodology Application Matrix
+### Methodology Application Matrix
 
 | Method | Applied | Quality | Evidence |
 |--------|:-------:|:-------:|---------|
@@ -1303,9 +1291,9 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation
+### Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation
 
-### Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17)
+#### Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17)
 **Key watchpoints from previous run**:
 
 | Watchpoint (from 2026-04-17) | Status Today (2026-04-20) | Evidence |
@@ -1317,7 +1305,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Bernadotte diplomatic sensitivity (IP435) | 🟡 PENDING | No government response yet; April 30 deadline |
 | Women's shelter closures narrative | 🟡 ONGOING | No new documents today but background risk remains |
 
-### Realtime Monitor Watchpoints (2026-04-20 earlier run — realtime-1428)
+#### Realtime Monitor Watchpoints (2026-04-20 earlier run — realtime-1428)
 **From memory: lead story "KU Summons Finance Minister Svantesson"**
 
 | Watchpoint | This Evening's Relevance | Resolution |
@@ -1327,7 +1315,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD10439 police interpellation (new) | 🟩 NEW TODAY | Added to analysis as major finding |
 | Opposition acceleration pre-EU Summit | 🟩 CONFIRMED | 8 questions today confirms pre-EU Summit pressure |
 
-### Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 14–19)
+#### Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 14–19)
 | Watchpoint | Status | Notes |
 |-----------|:------:|-------|
 | Spring Economic Bill media narrative | 🟧 EVOLVING | GDP gap (0.82% vs Denmark 3.48%) remains problematic |
@@ -1338,24 +1326,23 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence
+### Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence
 
-### Pass 1 (Initial draft)
+#### Pass 1 (Initial draft)
 - Initial analysis focused primarily on individual document summaries
 - Risk scoring was initially 3 risks; expanded to 5 after reading cross-reference patterns
 - International comparative initially had 3 jurisdictions; expanded to 6 on re-read
 - Scenario analysis initially only 2 scenarios; third "constitutional week" scenario added after cross-referencing HD11726 with KU33/KU32 context
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-20 17:31 UTC
 **Analysis Type**: evening-analysis
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
 **Workflow**: news-evening-analysis
 
-## Documents Analyzed
+### Documents Analyzed
 
 **Documents Analyzed**: 14
 
@@ -1376,13 +1363,13 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD11726-1 | fr | — | Kunskap om grundlagarna (svar) | ✅ Summary |
 | HD11727-1 | fr | — | Passkopior (svar) | ✅ Summary |
 
-## Data Sources
+### Data Sources
 
 - riksdag-regering MCP: get_betankanden, get_interpellationer, get_fragor
 - Sibling analysis cross-references: committeeReports, propositions, motions, interpellations
 - Government press releases (g0v.se): Sverige ökar humanitärt stöd till Libanon (2026-04-19)
 
-## Completeness Assessment
+### Completeness Assessment
 
 - **Core committee reports**: 3/3 (KU42, KU43, MJU21) — HIGH completeness
 - **Interpellations (new)**: 1/1 (HD10439) — HIGH completeness
@@ -1390,7 +1377,25 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **Sibling analysis integrated**: committeeReports (6 docs), propositions (9 docs), motions (21 docs), interpellations (10 docs)
 - **Government communications**: 1 press release (Libanon aid increase)
 
-## Download Timestamps
+### Download Timestamps
 
 - Script pipeline: 2026-04-20 17:29 UTC
 - AI analysis: 2026-04-20 17:31 UTC
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/article.md
index d5eca3fcd2..1d493994c3 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-20
 subfolder: interpellations
 slug: 2026-04-20-interpellations
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.870Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.665Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -24,14 +24,13 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 15 interpellations across the period — of which **10 are in scope for this analysis** (`HD10429–HD10438`, including one withdrawal, HD10436). This 10-document set represents the largest concentrated accountability push of riksmöte 2025/26. The decisive signal is that **Sweden will fail to transpose the EU Pay Transparency Directive by its June 7, 2026 deadline**, after the government withdrew its own implementation proposal. This is documented in the official Riksdag record via interpellation 2025/26:437 (HD10437). The Social Democrats (S) are weaponising this failure through a coordinated pre-Election-2026 narrative with two April-17 twin interpellations against Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson (L), five accumulated interpellations against Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD), and an independent MP (El-Haj) pressing Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard (M) on historical Israel accountability with a 10-day response window. **Government response strategy in the April 29–May 5 window will determine whether this wave converts into a durable Election-2026 narrative.**
 
-## Top 5 Strategic Findings
+### Top 5 Strategic Findings
 
 1. 🔴 **Documented EU-directive transposition failure** (HD10437, sig 9.2/10). Sweden's own withdrawal of its implementation proposal creates an **irrefutable factual record** that S will exploit for 6+ months running up to Election 2026. Government loses rhetorical manoeuvre room.
 
@@ -43,7 +42,7 @@ Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 1
 
 5. 🟡 **Tactical withdrawal signal** (HD10436, space industry, S/Wiking). Voluntary withdrawal suggests informal government-industry accommodation on strategic industrial policy — a **positive** signal for Nordic space-sector cooperation despite the broader accountability climate.
 
-## Ministerial Accountability Snapshot
+### Ministerial Accountability Snapshot
 
 | Minister | Party | Interp. count (active) | Nearest deadline | Risk |
 |----------|-------|------------------------|------------------|------|
@@ -57,14 +56,14 @@ Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 1
 | Gunnar Strömmer | M | 1 (HD10429) | April 21 | 🟢 MODERATE |
 | Lotta Edholm | L | 0 (HD10436 withdrawn) | — | 🟢 LOW |
 
-## Strategic Implications (Election 2026)
+### Strategic Implications (Election 2026)
 
 - **S has a campaign spine**: EU directive failure + women's shelters + billionaire tax paradox + housing decline + infrastructure saturation. These themes are mutually reinforcing and give S a coherent narrative arc.
 - **Coalition fault lines surface**: L minister failing on gender equality (core L brand), KD minister most-targeted (housing/infrastructure), SD applying inverted-expected pressure (HD10429 freedom-of-expression), C differentiating on LGBTQI+ rights (HD10431). The Tidö arrangement is showing strain.
 - **The June 7 EU deadline is a countdown clock**: S gains one more headline every week Larsson fails to announce implementation progress. The campaign narrative extends naturally into summer.
 - **Diplomatic exposure**: HD10435 (Bernadotte) forces a Swedish foreign-policy position on Israel that Malmer Stenergard has so far managed to keep general. The three explicit demands (accountability/apology/compensation) prevent general framing.
 
-## Recommended Government Counter-Moves (for situational awareness)
+### Recommended Government Counter-Moves (for situational awareness)
 
 | Threat | Neutralising move | Likely? | Political cost |
 |--------|-------------------|---------|----------------|
@@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 1
 | HD10433 tax | Announcement of a targeted review | P=0.55 | Low |
 | HD10435 Bernadotte | Firm but narrow historical acknowledgement | P=0.65 | Low (satisfies most expectations) |
 
-## What to Watch (Next 14 days)
+### What to Watch (Next 14 days)
 
 - April 21 ANM of HD10437 + HD10438 (chamber announcement)
 - April 21 chamber debate on HD10429 (freedom of expression) and HD10430 (mosques)
@@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 1
 - May 5 responses: HD10437 (EU directive), HD10438 (shelters)
 - Weekly: Swedish polling (Novus, Sifo, Demoskop) — any S bounce from the coordinated attacks
 
-## Bottom Line
+### Bottom Line
 
 This interpellation wave is the **first clear evidence** of S operating in full pre-election accountability mode. The coordination, the documentary record (EU directive withdrawal, Länsstyrelsen data, El-Haj's three demands), and the clustering of response deadlines in April 29 – May 5 make it operationally significant. The next 14 days will determine whether the government neutralises this pressure or allows it to compound into a durable narrative running to September 2026.
 
@@ -95,20 +94,19 @@ This interpellation wave is the **first clear evidence** of S operating in full
 **Next update**: 2026-04-29 (post-Carlson-response review)
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Analysis Depth**: Deep | **Confidence**: HIGH
 
 ---
 
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 
 Sweden's opposition Social Democrats (S) have entered their most intensive pre-election parliamentary accountability phase, filing 7 of 10 interpellations since April 14 and 2 on the same day (April 17) targeting the same minister (Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson, L) on coordinated gender equality themes. The discovery that Sweden will FAIL to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive on time — after the government withdrew its own implementation proposal (frs 2025/26:437) — represents the most politically significant parliamentary development of the current session. Combined with documented women's shelter closures (frs 2025/26:438), this creates a "gender accountability double bind" that L's liberal minister cannot easily escape. Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD) now faces his 6th+ interpellation, cementing S's "infrastructure failure" narrative. Independent MP Jamal El-Haj's interpellation demanding Israeli accountability for the 1948 assassination of Folke Bernadotte (frs 2025/26:435) carries a 10-day response deadline and will force Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard (M) into the most diplomatically sensitive response of the current session.
 
 ---
 
-## Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)
+### Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)
 
 1. **[HIGH] S coordinates dual gender equality attack**: Amloh files two interpellations on same day targeting same minister (Nina Larsson, L) — frs 2025/26:437 (EU directive failure) + frs 2025/26:438 (women's shelter closures). SISVA both May 5.
 
@@ -122,7 +120,7 @@ Sweden's opposition Social Democrats (S) have entered their most intensive pre-e
 
 ---
 
-## Article Decision
+### Article Decision
 
 **Publish**: YES — High newsworthiness  
 **Priority**: 1 (Immediate)  
@@ -131,7 +129,7 @@ Sweden's opposition Social Democrats (S) have entered their most intensive pre-e
 
 ---
 
-## AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 **Recommended Title (EN)**: Sweden Misses EU Pay Equality Deadline as Opposition Mounts Coordinated Pre-Election Accountability Campaign
 
@@ -143,9 +141,9 @@ Sweden's opposition Social Democrats (S) have entered their most intensive pre-e
 
 ---
 
-## Election 2026 Implications
+### Election 2026 Implications
 
-### Electoral Impact Assessment
+#### Electoral Impact Assessment
 | Factor | Analysis | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|-----------|
 | **Gender gap** | S's dual filing on gender equality is explicitly pre-election. Women's shelter closures + EU pay directive = powerful combination for 2026 | 🟩 HIGH |
@@ -154,14 +152,14 @@ Sweden's opposition Social Democrats (S) have entered their most intensive pre-e
 | **Voter salience** | Women's safety (shelters) is top-10 voter issue; housing construction decline affects young voters directly | 🟩 HIGH |
 | **Campaign vulnerability** | Government has no easy answer to EU directive failure — factual record established in parliament | 🟩 HIGH |
 
-### Coalition Scenario Implications
+#### Coalition Scenario Implications
 - **Red-Green government (S-led)**: S's interpellation campaign is laying pre-election foundation. EU directive, women's shelters, housing, tax fairness are all coalition-building themes with V and MP [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]
 - **Continued M-KD-SD-L government**: Can win re-election only if they neutralize the accountability narratives. Carlson's portfolio weakness is the most exposed [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]
 - **Centre-right realignment (M + C + L)**: C's LGBTQ+ interpellation (HD10431) positions them as distinct from SD-leaning government. C may differentiate on human rights [LOW confidence 🟥]
 
 ---
 
-## Ministerial Accountability Summary
+### Ministerial Accountability Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -185,7 +183,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Data Quality Note
+### Data Quality Note
 - Full text available: HD10437, HD10438, HD10435, HD10434, HD10433 (verified via get_dokument)
 - Summary data: HD10432, HD10431, HD10430, HD10429
 - Withdrawn: HD10436 (politically significant absence)
@@ -193,8 +191,7 @@ graph LR
 - World Bank data: Sweden GDP growth 2024 0.82%, unemployment 2025 8.694%, inflation 2024 2.836%
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analytic framework**: Structured Analytic Techniques (SATs) — ACH, Key Assumptions Check, Red Team / Devil's Advocate
 **Analysis date**: 2026-04-20 | **Confidence baseline**: HIGH | **AI-FIRST iterations**: 2
@@ -203,13 +200,13 @@ This document applies three structured analytic techniques to pressure-test the
 
 ---
 
-## Part 1 — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)
+### Part 1 — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)
 
-### Central Question
+#### Central Question
 
 **What is the primary driver of the observed April 14–17 interpellation wave from S?**
 
-### Candidate Hypotheses
+#### Candidate Hypotheses
 
 | # | Hypothesis | A priori plausibility |
 |---|-----------|----------------------|
@@ -219,7 +216,7 @@ This document applies three structured analytic techniques to pressure-test the
 | H4 | **Coalition-partner-signal seeking** — S is attempting to probe where the government coalition is internally weakest (testing Tidö fault lines) | MEDIUM |
 | H5 | **Background base-rate noise** — April is a typical high-interpellation month; no special pattern | LOW |
 
-### Evidence Matrix
+#### Evidence Matrix
 
 Legend: ✓✓ (strongly supports), ✓ (weakly supports), ✗ (weakly inconsistent), ✗✗ (strongly inconsistent), — (neutral)
 
@@ -247,7 +244,7 @@ Legend: ✓✓ (strongly supports), ✓ (weakly supports), ✗ (weakly inconsist
 | H4 Fault-line | 0 | 0 | 0 |
 | H5 Noise | 4 | 2 | 6 |
 
-### ACH Conclusion
+#### ACH Conclusion
 
 Following Heuer's ACH logic (focus on inconsistency, not consistency):
 
@@ -260,11 +257,11 @@ Following Heuer's ACH logic (focus on inconsistency, not consistency):
 
 ---
 
-## Part 2 — Key Assumptions Check
+### Part 2 — Key Assumptions Check
 
 For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and tested for vulnerability.
 
-### Judgement: "Sweden will miss the EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition deadline"
+#### Judgement: "Sweden will miss the EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition deadline"
 
 | Assumption | Validity | Test |
 |-----------|----------|------|
@@ -276,7 +273,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 **Assessment**: Primary assumptions hold. A3 is the only hedged assumption — emergency legislation is theoretically possible but politically unlikely.
 
-### Judgement: "S is operating in coordinated pre-election mode"
+#### Judgement: "S is operating in coordinated pre-election mode"
 
 | Assumption | Validity | Test |
 |-----------|----------|------|
@@ -288,7 +285,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 **Assessment**: B1, B3 are strong. B2, B4, B5 carry more uncertainty — but their combination remains convergent evidence of coordination.
 
-### Judgement: "Carlson (KD) is electorally vulnerable"
+#### Judgement: "Carlson (KD) is electorally vulnerable"
 
 | Assumption | Validity | Test |
 |-----------|----------|------|
@@ -299,7 +296,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 **Assessment**: Main argument holds; specific vulnerability depends on C3 which warrants direct verification of prior Carlson interpellation responses (planned for next iteration).
 
-### Systemic Assumption Check
+#### Systemic Assumption Check
 
 - We assume **S leadership coordinates interpellations**. If this is wrong (e.g., S is more decentralised than modelled), the "campaign" judgement weakens into "spontaneous opportunism" (H2).
 - We assume **interpellations convert to electoral advantage**. This requires media amplification and campaign operationalisation — both are plausible but not guaranteed.
@@ -307,9 +304,9 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 ---
 
-## Part 3 — Red Team / Devil's Advocate
+### Part 3 — Red Team / Devil's Advocate
 
-### Red Team Position 1: "The government will neutralise the wave"
+#### Red Team Position 1: "The government will neutralise the wave"
 
 **Argument**: The government has the institutional resources and ministerial experience to defuse each interpellation individually. By May 5, Larsson will likely announce a Pay Transparency Directive implementation plan (possibly by interim administrative measure). Svantesson will signal tax review. Carlson will announce a housing package. The wave will peak on April 29–May 5 and then dissipate. By June, it will be last-month news.
 
@@ -317,7 +314,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 **Assessment**: This is a **plausible counter-scenario** (P≈0.25). It assumes the government is strategically aware and operationally unified. The counter-counter: the coalition's internal tensions (L minister, KD minister, SD pressure) complicate unified response. But it cannot be dismissed.
 
-### Red Team Position 2: "S is overplaying their hand"
+#### Red Team Position 2: "S is overplaying their hand"
 
 **Argument**: 15 interpellations in 2 weeks is **too much**. Voters do not distinguish between 5 interpellations and 15 interpellations — both register as "noise." By trying to saturate across housing, gender, tax, foreign policy, healthcare, S risks diluting focus. A tighter, punchier campaign would be more effective. The tactical withdrawal of HD10436 supports this critique: S is now recognising the saturation risk.
 
@@ -325,7 +322,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 **Assessment**: **Valid critique** but partially mitigated by (a) parallel targeted attacks on individual ministers (Carlson, Larsson) that *are* focused; (b) the dual-filing choreography which *concentrates* rather than dilutes attention. The saturation risk is real but currently managed.
 
-### Red Team Position 3: "El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation will backfire"
+#### Red Team Position 3: "El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation will backfire"
 
 **Argument**: Sweden's political culture generally avoids open confrontation with allies on historical grievances. El-Haj, as an independent without party backing, lacks institutional weight. The interpellation may attract fringe support but could alienate mainstream voters who view it as excessive. The Foreign Ministry will give a narrow historical-acknowledgement response, and the issue will be parked.
 
@@ -333,7 +330,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 **Assessment**: **Partially valid**. It is likely that the substantive demands will not be met. But the **reputational cost** is not primarily about whether Israel apologises — it is about whether Sweden's foreign minister can articulate a coherent position. Even a "narrow historical acknowledgement" becomes a news event. The Red Team position is too narrow.
 
-### Red Team Position 4: "The economic context undermines S's narrative"
+#### Red Team Position 4: "The economic context undermines S's narrative"
 
 **Argument**: Sweden's inflation has cooled (2.836% in 2024 from 8.5% in 2023); real wages are recovering; unemployment, while elevated at 8.694%, has structural components unrelated to government policy. By September 2026, economic conditions may have improved enough that accountability narratives appear dated. The government could point to macro stabilisation as counter-evidence.
 
@@ -341,7 +338,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 **Assessment**: **Valid macroeconomic critique**. S's narrative leans on micro-level failures (housing, shelters, EU compliance) precisely *because* the macro story is mixed. This is a sophisticated targeting — the macro is harder to attack, so S focuses on verifiable micro-failures. Red Team critique is correct that the macro context is not supportive, but this is *why* S's strategy is what it is.
 
-### Devil's Advocate Summary
+#### Devil's Advocate Summary
 
 | Red Team position | Strength | Update to main judgement |
 |-------------------|----------|--------------------------|
@@ -352,7 +349,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 
 ---
 
-## Analytic Integrity Checklist
+### Analytic Integrity Checklist
 
 - [x] ACH matrix completed across 5 hypotheses
 - [x] Inconsistency-counting (not consistency-counting) applied
@@ -364,7 +361,7 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 - [x] No evidence ignored (including counter-evidence)
 - [x] Analytic integrity: conclusions modified by Red Team where warranted
 
-## Final Intelligence Judgements (Post-SAT)
+### Final Intelligence Judgements (Post-SAT)
 
 1. [HIGH confidence 🟩] S is operating a **coordinated pre-Election-2026 accountability campaign** (H1, with H4 as component)
 2. [HIGH confidence 🟩] Sweden will **fail** to transpose EU Pay Transparency Directive by June 7, 2026 unless emergency legislation is enacted
@@ -381,12 +378,11 @@ For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and teste
 - UK Ministry of Defence, *Red Teaming Handbook* (2021).
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Scoring Framework**: Newsworthiness × Political Impact × Accountability Pressure
 
-## Ranked Significance Matrix
+### Ranked Significance Matrix
 
 | Rank | dok_id | frs | Score | Dimensions |
 |------|--------|-----|-------|-----------|
@@ -401,7 +397,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | 9 | **HD10430** | frs 2025/26:430 | **5.2/10** | Mosque hate-speech scrutiny, SD-KD minister accountability |
 | 10 | **HD10436** | frs 2025/26:436 | **4.0/10** | WITHDRAWN — signals political negotiation in space policy |
 
-## Top Finding Narrative
+### Top Finding Narrative
 
 **PRIMARY SIGNIFICANCE** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Sweden's social democratic opposition (S) has filed two interpellations on the same day (April 17, 2026) targeting the same minister (Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson, L) on related gender equality topics. Interpellation frs 2025/26:437 reveals that Sweden will FAIL to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive on time after the government withdrew its implementation proposal — a serious EU compliance breach that strengthens S's pre-election narrative on gender equality and European commitment. The simultaneous filing of frs 2025/26:438 on women's shelter closures compounds the pressure by adding a direct human cost dimension: women fleeing domestic violence losing access to crisis shelters.
 
@@ -409,14 +405,14 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **TERTIARY SIGNIFICANCE** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The withdrawal of interpellation frs 2025/26:436 on the Swedish space industry by Mats Wiking (S) is politically notable. Withdrawals typically indicate either a negotiated government commitment or tactical repositioning. Given that Sweden's space sector (Kiruna/Esrange) is a key industrial and NATO-adjacent strategic asset, this withdrawal merits monitoring.
 
-## Economic Context Relevance
+### Economic Context Relevance
 
 The following World Bank indicators provide quantitative grounding:
 - Sweden GDP growth 2024: **0.82%** (down from 5.2% in 2021) — supports tax reform urgency (HD10433) [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]
 - Sweden unemployment 2025: **8.694%** (rising trend) — supports labor market/integration interpellations [HIGH confidence 🟩]
 - Sweden inflation 2024: **2.836%** (down from 8.5% in 2023) — cost-of-living context for housing (HD10434) [HIGH confidence 🟩]
 
-## Multi-Dimensional Scoring Methodology
+### Multi-Dimensional Scoring Methodology
 
 Each interpellation is scored across **five dimensions** on a 0–10 scale, with weights reflecting political-intelligence priorities. The aggregate is computed as a weighted mean.
 
@@ -428,7 +424,7 @@ Each interpellation is scored across **five dimensions** on a 0–10 scale, with
 | Evidence Density | 0.15 | Volume of verifiable facts in the interpellation text |
 | Timing Sensitivity | 0.20 | Proximity of response deadline and policy-clock constraints (e.g., EU directive) |
 
-### Detailed Scoring Breakdown
+#### Detailed Scoring Breakdown
 
 | dok_id | News | Pol.Imp | Acct | Evid | Timing | Weighted |
 |--------|:----:|:-------:|:----:|:----:|:------:|:--------:|
@@ -443,7 +439,7 @@ Each interpellation is scored across **five dimensions** on a 0–10 scale, with
 | HD10430 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | **5.30** |
 | HD10436 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | **3.35** |
 
-### Dimension Highlights
+#### Dimension Highlights
 
 **Highest newsworthiness**: HD10437, HD10435 (both 9.5). Documented EU failure + historical-assassination diplomatic demands both have strong media hooks.
 
@@ -455,18 +451,18 @@ Each interpellation is scored across **five dimensions** on a 0–10 scale, with
 
 **Highest timing sensitivity**: HD10435 (9.5). 10-day response window + political urgency.
 
-## Confidence Grading of Scores
+### Confidence Grading of Scores
 
 Scores are analyst estimates on a 10-point scale. Inter-rater reliability was not formally measured (single-analyst process), but scores were stress-tested by:
 1. Cross-check against historical interpellations (*Statsministerdatabasen*, Riksdag records)
 2. Benchmark against published editorial coverage where available
 3. Red-Team re-scoring of top-3 documents (no material change)
 
-## Comparative Historical Context
+### Comparative Historical Context
 
 The top-scoring interpellation of the 2025/26 session prior to this wave was HD10413 *(frs 2025/26:413, energy-supply question to Ebba Busch/KD)* at 7.8/10. **HD10437 (9.24) is the highest-scoring interpellation of rm 2025/26 to date.** This alone is a significant political-intelligence signal: the peak accountability pressure of the session has shifted from energy policy to gender equality / EU compliance.
 
-## Pre/Post-Election Significance Decay
+### Pre/Post-Election Significance Decay
 
 An interpellation's significance decays differently depending on its type:
 
@@ -481,30 +477,29 @@ An interpellation's significance decays differently depending on its type:
 **Implication for Election 2026 campaign planning**: Documented-failure type (HD10437 in particular) should be the **centrepiece** of S's pre-election messaging because its significance grows through summer. Force-position type (HD10435) should be deployed at the April 30 response moment and then retired. Brand-signalling is for steady-state differentiation, not peak moments.
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Framework**: Multi-actor perspective analysis
 
 ---
 
-## Minister Perspectives (Government Side)
+### Minister Perspectives (Government Side)
 
-### Nina Larsson (L — Jämställdhetsminister)
+#### Nina Larsson (L — Jämställdhetsminister)
 **Position**: Under dual coordinated attack from S. Must respond to both frs 2025/26:437 (EU Pay Transparency) and frs 2025/26:438 (women's shelter closures) by May 5.
 
 **Expected Response Strategy**: Larsson will likely argue that (1) the Pay Transparency Directive implementation is complex and quality of Swedish implementation matters more than speed; (2) women's shelters receive support through existing mechanisms, and responsibility is distributed across government. However, the documented withdrawal of the implementation proposal means she cannot dispute the timeline failure on HD10437.
 
 **Vulnerability Assessment**: [HIGH] The withdrawn proposal is a factual record that S will use in election 2026 campaign materials. L as a liberal party claiming gender equality credentials while presiding over directive failure creates internal party contradictions.
 
-### Andreas Carlson (KD — Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)
+#### Andreas Carlson (KD — Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)
 **Position**: Most-targeted minister in rm 2025/26 with 6+ interpellations. Housing/infrastructure portfolio encompasses strategic military bases, regional airports (Torsby/Hagfors via HD10424), emergency airports (Scandinavian Mountain via HD10428), highway safety (Riksväg 62 via HD10418), and now Stockholm housing construction decline (HD10434).
 
 **Expected Response Strategy**: Market-based solutions, municipal responsibility, and long-term planning arguments. However, the breadth of failures documented across his portfolio makes a coherent narrative difficult.
 
 **Vulnerability Assessment**: [HIGH] The cumulative interpellation record creates a pattern narrative that S is actively building. Each response that fails to commit to concrete action becomes another data point.
 
-### Maria Malmer Stenergard (M — Utrikesminister)
+#### Maria Malmer Stenergard (M — Utrikesminister)
 **Position**: Faces the politically sensitive Bernadotte interpellation with an April 30 deadline.
 
 **Expected Response Strategy**: The Swedish government will almost certainly decline to demand compensation and apology from Israel, citing the limitations of diplomatic intervention in historical matters, the complexity of Israel-Sweden relations, and that the 1948 events fall outside current bilateral frameworks. However, the question of Swedish government acknowledgment of Israel's responsibility is harder to evade given that the assassins' identities are documented.
@@ -513,9 +508,9 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Opposition Actor Perspectives
+### Opposition Actor Perspectives
 
-### Socialdemokraterna (S) — Primary Accountability Actor
+#### Socialdemokraterna (S) — Primary Accountability Actor
 **Strategy**: Coordinated, thematic interpellation campaign across gender equality, housing, healthcare, and taxation. The dual April 17 filing targeting Larsson signals S's gender equality campaign is entering its intensive phase.
 
 **Key S Actors**:
@@ -527,42 +522,41 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 **Political Significance**: S's 7 new interpellations since April 14 demonstrate disciplined pre-election strategy, targeting both the government's EU compliance record and domestic welfare failures.
 
-### Sverigedemokraterna (SD) — Secondary Accountability Actor
+#### Sverigedemokraterna (SD) — Secondary Accountability Actor
 **Strategy**: Two interpellations targeting freedom of expression (frs 2025/26:429 — justice minister Strömmer, M) and mosque oversight (frs 2025/26:430 — social minister Forssmed, KD). SD is operating in its traditional lanes: national identity, freedom of expression, and scrutiny of religious institutions.
 
 **Significance**: The mosque interpellation (HD10430 by Richard Jomshof — senior SD MP) targets a KD minister on an issue where SD and KD have policy differences. This represents intra-coalition pressure rather than opposition-government confrontation.
 
-### Centerpartiet (C) — Targeted International Focus
+#### Centerpartiet (C) — Targeted International Focus
 **Anna Lasses** (frs 2025/26:431): LGBTQ+ rights in foreign aid — positions C as a progressive voice on international human rights. This interpellation targets M's development minister Dousa, testing whether the government's foreign aid policy reflects Sweden's human rights commitments.
 
-### Jamal El-Haj (Independent)
+#### Jamal El-Haj (Independent)
 **Background**: Formerly affiliated with S before leaving the party. Now independent (-). His Bernadotte interpellation is the most detailed and historically ambitious of the period — a 1,500-word document connecting 1948 to 2026. 
 
 **Significance**: El-Haj's presence as an independent enables him to raise Israel-Palestine issues more directly than S party leadership would sanction. The three explicit demands (accountability, apology, compensation) go further than Swedish government policy.
 
 ---
 
-## Institutional Perspectives
+### Institutional Perspectives
 
-### Riksdag Chamber
+#### Riksdag Chamber
 The announcement (ANM) of frs 2025/26:437 and frs 2025/26:438 is scheduled for April 21, 2026 (tomorrow). This will place gender equality in the parliamentary spotlight immediately.
 
-### EU Commission (External Stakeholder)
+#### EU Commission (External Stakeholder)
 Sweden's failure to implement the Pay Transparency Directive on time (frs 2025/26:437) creates a compliance obligation for the Commission. If Sweden does not formally respond, infringement proceedings are available under EU law. The Commission typically grants grace periods before formal action but the political accountability occurs domestically through parliamentary scrutiny.
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analysis date**: 2026-04-20 | **Horizon**: 14 days (response window) + 5 months (to Election 2026, September 2026)
 **Method**: Morphological scenario construction with key-uncertainty decomposition
 **AI-FIRST iterations**: 2 (pass 1 draft + pass 2 stress-test)
 
-## Purpose
+### Purpose
 
 Four alternative futures for the April 29 – May 5 response window and subsequent political dynamics through September 2026. Probabilities are analyst estimates, sum to ~1.0 (minor overlap intentional). Each scenario covers: trigger, pathway, political effect, Election 2026 implication, and observable indicators to discriminate between scenarios early.
 
-## Key Uncertainties (2-axis morphology)
+### Key Uncertainties (2-axis morphology)
 
 The scenarios are generated from the **Cartesian product of two decisive uncertainties**:
 
@@ -578,8 +572,8 @@ The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 1 — "Neutralisation" (A1 × B1)
-### Government strong + S sustained
+### Scenario 1 — "Neutralisation" (A1 × B1)
+#### Government strong + S sustained
 
 **Probability**: P = 0.20
 
@@ -601,8 +595,8 @@ The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 2 — "S Campaign Traction" (A2 × B1)
-### Government weak + S sustained
+### Scenario 2 — "S Campaign Traction" (A2 × B1)
+#### Government weak + S sustained
 
 **Probability**: P = 0.35 (MOST LIKELY)
 
@@ -622,8 +616,8 @@ The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 3 — "Fragmentation" (A2 × B2)
-### Government weak + S dissipated
+### Scenario 3 — "Fragmentation" (A2 × B2)
+#### Government weak + S dissipated
 
 **Probability**: P = 0.25
 
@@ -643,8 +637,8 @@ The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 4 — "Coalition Rupture" (A1 × B2)
-### Government strong + S dissipated but coalition fractures internally
+### Scenario 4 — "Coalition Rupture" (A1 × B2)
+#### Government strong + S dissipated but coalition fractures internally
 
 **Probability**: P = 0.10 (TAIL RISK)
 
@@ -664,7 +658,7 @@ The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Probability Summary
+### Scenario Probability Summary
 
 | # | Scenario | Short name | Probability |
 |---|---------|-----------|:-----------:|
@@ -675,7 +669,7 @@ The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.
 | — | Residual / unmodelled | — | 0.10 |
 |   | **Sum** | | **1.00** |
 
-## Decision Indicators Matrix
+### Decision Indicators Matrix
 
 A single indicator grid for rapid scenario discrimination by mid-May 2026:
 
@@ -689,7 +683,7 @@ A single indicator grid for rapid scenario discrimination by mid-May 2026:
 | EU Commission informal signal on Sweden | ✗ | ✓ | Mixed | Mixed |
 | Kvinnojour emergency funding announcement | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ (then blocked) |
 
-## Analytic Judgement
+### Analytic Judgement
 
 The **modal expectation** is S2 "S Traction" at P=0.35, with S3 "Fragmentation" as the most likely alternative at P=0.25. The combined probability of S2 + S3 (weak government response) is **0.60** — the base case is that the government response will be procedural and not neutralising, driven by coalition-internal constraints on issuing concessions.
 
@@ -697,13 +691,13 @@ The **upside scenario for the government** (S1, P=0.20) requires active coordina
 
 The **tail risk** (S4, P=0.10) is low-probability but high-impact — analysts should monitor SD public criticism as the primary leading indicator.
 
-## Red Team Reflection
+### Red Team Reflection
 
 *Could we be over-weighting S2?* The coordination pattern is clear, but it is a single observation (one dual-filing). A counter-case would require S to show similar coordination in ≥2 other waves this session. So far, only this wave shows it at such density. Weakening S2 slightly (from 0.40 to 0.35) and redistributing to S3 (0.20 → 0.25) accounts for this.
 
 *Could we be under-weighting S4?* Coalition tensions have been consistently present but have not produced rupture. P=0.10 is appropriate unless specific trigger events emerge.
 
-## Next-Update Triggers
+### Next-Update Triggers
 
 This scenario set should be **re-evaluated** when any of the following occur:
 - First ministerial response (April 21 for HD10429, HD10430)
@@ -721,12 +715,11 @@ This scenario set should be **re-evaluated** when any of the following occur:
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM — scenarios are probabilistic and depend on decision-maker choices not yet made
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Framework**: Likelihood × Impact (1–5 scale)
 
-## Risk Matrix
+### Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk ID | Risk | Likelihood (L) | Impact (I) | Score (L×I) | Severity |
 |---------|------|---------------|-----------|-------------|---------|
@@ -741,7 +734,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R009 | Freedom of expression debate on prop 2025/26:133 escalates | 2 | 3 | **6** | 🟡 ELEVATED |
 | R010 | Withdrawn interpellation (HD10436/space) signals unresolved industry concerns | 2 | 2 | **4** | 🟢 MODERATE |
 
-## Ministerial Accountability Scorecard
+### Ministerial Accountability Scorecard
 
 | Minister | Party | Interpellations (Active) | Urgency | Accountability Risk |
 |---------|-------|------------------------|---------|-------------------|
@@ -754,20 +747,20 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | **Jakob Forssmed** | KD (Socialminister) | 1 (HD10430) | Pending | 🟢 MODERATE |
 | **Gunnar Strömmer** | M (Justitieminister) | 1 (HD10429) | Pending | 🟢 MODERATE |
 
-## Forward Risk Indicators
+### Forward Risk Indicators
 
-### Immediate (0–14 days, before May 5)
+#### Immediate (0–14 days, before May 5)
 - [ ] Response to frs 2025/26:435 (Bernadotte) by April 30 — diplomatic/historical justice test
 - [ ] Response to frs 2025/26:434 (Stockholm housing) by April 30 — Carlson accountability
 - [ ] Response to frs 2025/26:433 (tax reform) by April 29 — Svantesson legitimacy
 - [ ] Announcement of HD10437/HD10438 announced in chamber April 21 (tomorrow)
 
-### Medium-term (2–6 weeks)
+#### Medium-term (2–6 weeks)
 - [ ] EU Commission reaction to Sweden's failure on Pay Transparency Directive
 - [ ] Potential vote of no confidence against targeted minister if interpellation debate reveals gaps
 - [ ] S campaign integration of interpellation themes into election 2026 messaging
 
-## Economic Risk Context
+### Economic Risk Context
 
 | Indicator | Value | Direction | Risk Implication |
 |-----------|-------|-----------|-----------------|
@@ -776,7 +769,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | Sweden housing starts (Stockholm 2026) | ~11,091 | ↓ -900 | Confirms HD10434 data — Carlson's failure quantified |
 | Sweden inflation (2024) | 2.836% | ↓ Cooling | Cost of living stabilizing but structural issues remain |
 
-## Risk Treatment Options (for Government)
+### Risk Treatment Options (for Government)
 
 | Risk ID | Mitigate | Transfer | Avoid | Accept |
 |---------|----------|----------|-------|--------|
@@ -788,7 +781,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R006 Hospitals | State co-investment mechanism | To regions (current) | — | Structural; hard to neutralise in short term |
 | R007 Coordination signal | Coalition strategic communications | — | — | Requires active coalition coherence |
 
-## Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)
+### Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)
 
 Leading indicators to monitor between now and the summer recess:
 
@@ -803,7 +796,7 @@ Leading indicators to monitor between now and the summer recess:
 | KRI-7: Coalition internal-meeting cadence | Fewer than weekly | Regeringskansliet kalender |
 | KRI-8: S motion of no confidence discussion | Any credible leak | Parliamentary journalists |
 
-## Escalation Triggers
+### Escalation Triggers
 
 **Tier 1 (government must respond within 24h)**:
 - EU Commission formal notice on Pay Transparency Directive
@@ -820,14 +813,14 @@ Leading indicators to monitor between now and the summer recess:
 - Trade union public pressure
 - Opposition committee-hearing requests
 
-## Risk Register Evolution
+### Risk Register Evolution
 
 This risk register replaces the previous interpellation-wave register (2026-04-13) and is the active register until the next wave analysis. Key changes:
 - R001 elevated from score 15 (previous) to 20 (this update) following full-text analysis of HD10437
 - R004 Carlson elevated from score 12 to 16 following 6th-interpellation saturation signal
 - R010 (withdrawn-space) added as new low-severity register entry for tracking
 
-## Residual Risk Assessment
+### Residual Risk Assessment
 
 Even with optimal government risk-treatment, residual risks remain:
 - HD10437: Transposition after June 7 is still transposition failure; residual political cost ≥3/5 severity
@@ -836,7 +829,7 @@ Even with optimal government risk-treatment, residual risks remain:
 
 **Overall residual risk posture**: 🟧 ELEVATED. The interpellation wave has raised the session risk baseline and will not fully dissipate even with strong government responses.
 
-## Risk Ownership and Accountability Chain
+### Risk Ownership and Accountability Chain
 
 | Risk | Primary owner | Secondary owner | Executive accountability |
 |------|---------------|-----------------|-------------------------|
@@ -848,7 +841,7 @@ Even with optimal government risk-treatment, residual risks remain:
 | R006 Hospitals | Lann (KD) | Svantesson (M) | PM Kristersson |
 | R007 Coordination | Regeringskansliet strategic communications | All ministers | PM Kristersson |
 
-## Review Cadence
+### Review Cadence
 
 - Daily monitoring of KRIs during April 29 – May 5 window
 - Weekly review during May 6 – June 7
@@ -856,16 +849,15 @@ Even with optimal government risk-treatment, residual risks remain:
 - Quarterly review until Election 2026
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Focus**: Parliamentary Accountability — April 14–17 Wave
 
 ---
 
-## Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Matrix
+### Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Matrix
 
-### 1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General Public)
+#### 1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General Public)
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -877,7 +869,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Pay gap closure possible via EU directive — if government acts | frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — EU directive mechanism exists | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | +6/10 | 2026-04-17 |
 | **T** | Aging hospital infrastructure creating care gaps — 1960s buildings | frs 2025/26:432 HD10432 — hospital investment crisis | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | -7/10 | 2026-04-15 |
 
-### 2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD, L)
+#### 2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD, L)
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -889,7 +881,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Moderate responses can reframe interpellations as routine scrutiny | Standard parliamentary process | [LOW] 🟥 | +3/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 | **T** | Response to HD10435 (Bernadotte) requires diplomatic precision vs Israel | frs 2025/26:435 deadline April 30, 2026 | [HIGH] 🟩 | -8/10 | 2026-04-16 |
 
-### 3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C dissent)
+#### 3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C dissent)
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -900,7 +892,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Five interpellations with SISVA April 29–May 5 create accountability window before spring recess | Response deadlines clustered | [HIGH] 🟩 | +7/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 | **T** | If ministers respond effectively, parliamentary attention may shift away | Risk of deflection in responses | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | -4/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 
-### 4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv)
+#### 4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv)
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -910,7 +902,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Space industry interpellation withdrawn — signals government-industry dialogue active | frs 2025/26:436 withdrawn | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | +5/10 | 2026-04-16 |
 | **T** | Sweden unemployment at 8.694% (2025, World Bank) — rising trend hurts productivity | World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025 | [HIGH] 🟩 | -6/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 
-### 5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)
+#### 5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -921,7 +913,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Parliamentary pressure may trigger emergency government action on shelter funding | Accountability mechanism working | [LOW] 🟥 | +6/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 | **T** | Hospital infrastructure crisis without state guarantee endangers community care access | frs 2025/26:432 HD10432 | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | -7/10 | 2026-04-15 |
 
-### 6. INTERNATIONAL / EU
+#### 6. INTERNATIONAL / EU
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -931,7 +923,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Bernadotte interpellation creates opportunity for Sweden to lead on historical justice | frs 2025/26:435 — three explicit demands for apology/compensation | [LOW] 🟥 | +5/10 | 2026-04-16 |
 | **T** | Swedish foreign minister must balance Israel relations with LGBTQ/human rights portfolio | frs 2025/26:431 + frs 2025/26:435 combined | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | -6/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 
-### 7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL
+#### 7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -941,7 +933,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **O** | Parliamentary scrutiny of executive compliance with EU law creates constitutional accountability | EU directive obligation | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | +6/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 | **T** | Tax system inequality documented in interpellation creates legitimacy crisis risk | frs 2025/26:433 HD10433 | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | -5/10 | 2026-04-15 |
 
-### 8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION
+#### 8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (frs ID/dok_id) | Confidence | Impact | Entry Date |
 |---|-----------|--------------------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -952,13 +944,12 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | **T** | Mosque/freedom of expression interpellations (SD) may dominate coverage vs. substantive S issues | frs 2025/26:430 + frs 2025/26:429 | [MEDIUM] 🟧 | -5/10 | 2026-04-20 |
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Confidence**: HIGH overall (MCP live data, full text documents)  
 **Threat Level**: 🔴 HIGH — Multiple active accountability threats with near-term response deadlines
 
-## Overview Threat Assessment
+### Overview Threat Assessment
 
 Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase with 8 active interpellations across 8 ministers, 5 response deadlines clustering in the April 29 – May 5 window, and documented government policy failures that the opposition is systematically exploiting ahead of the 2026 general election.
 
@@ -966,7 +957,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 
 ---
 
-## Threat 1: EU Pay Transparency Directive Breach (frs 2025/26:437)
+### Threat 1: EU Pay Transparency Directive Breach (frs 2025/26:437)
 
 **Threat Actor**: S (Socialdemokraterna), Interpellation Sofia Amloh  
 **Target**: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)  
@@ -982,7 +973,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 
 ---
 
-## Threat 2: Women's Shelter Closure Crisis (frs 2025/26:438)
+### Threat 2: Women's Shelter Closure Crisis (frs 2025/26:438)
 
 **Threat Actor**: S (Socialdemokraterna), Interpellation Sofia Amloh  
 **Target**: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)  
@@ -996,7 +987,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 
 ---
 
-## Threat 3: Diplomatic Accountability — Bernadotte/Israel (frs 2025/26:435)
+### Threat 3: Diplomatic Accountability — Bernadotte/Israel (frs 2025/26:435)
 
 **Threat Actor**: Independent MP Jamal El-Haj (formerly S)  
 **Target**: Utrikesminister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)  
@@ -1009,7 +1000,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 
 ---
 
-## Threat 4: Infrastructure Minister Accountability Saturation (frs 2025/26:434)
+### Threat 4: Infrastructure Minister Accountability Saturation (frs 2025/26:434)
 
 **Threat Actor**: S (Leif Nysmed)  
 **Target**: Andreas Carlson (KD, Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)  
@@ -1021,7 +1012,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 
 ---
 
-## Threat 5: Government Tax Reform Resistance (frs 2025/26:433)
+### Threat 5: Government Tax Reform Resistance (frs 2025/26:433)
 
 **Threat Actor**: S (Ida Ekeroth Clausson)  
 **Target**: Finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)  
@@ -1033,7 +1024,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 | Threat | Confidence Level | Evidence Source |
 |--------|----------------|----------------|
@@ -1043,9 +1034,9 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 | Threat 4 (housing) | [HIGH] 🟩 | Länsstyrelsen Stockholm quantified data in frs 2025/26:434 |
 | Threat 5 (tax reform) | [HIGH] 🟩 | Systemic analysis in frs 2025/26:433 full text |
 
-## Threat Actor Profiling
+### Threat Actor Profiling
 
-### TA-1: Social Democrats (S) — Primary Threat Actor
+#### TA-1: Social Democrats (S) — Primary Threat Actor
 
 **Classification**: Institutional opposition party; tier-1 threat actor
 **Capability**: High — 107 MPs, professional party apparatus, coordinated whip system, union affiliations (LO, TCO), media reach
@@ -1065,7 +1056,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 | Exfiltration | Operationalising into election-campaign messaging | Expected post-May 5 |
 | Impact | Electoral gain through accumulated narrative | To be assessed post-September 2026 |
 
-### TA-2: Sweden Democrats (SD) — Secondary Threat Actor
+#### TA-2: Sweden Democrats (SD) — Secondary Threat Actor
 
 **Classification**: Coalition external supply party; tier-2 threat actor (asymmetric)
 **Capability**: Medium–High (72 MPs, coalition arrangement-based leverage)
@@ -1077,7 +1068,7 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 - **Balanced attack** (HD10429 + HD10430 — both liberty expansion and restriction depending on subject)
 - **Agenda visibility maintenance** — keeping religious-extremism issues in public view
 
-### TA-3: Jamal El-Haj (Independent) — Wildcard Actor
+#### TA-3: Jamal El-Haj (Independent) — Wildcard Actor
 
 **Classification**: Individual independent MP; tier-2 threat actor (institutional weight limited; asymmetric impact potential high)
 **Capability**: Low in raw numbers; high in diaspora-community mobilisation
@@ -1086,14 +1077,14 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
 
 **TTPs**: Single-issue concentrated pressure; using independent platform to make demands party-affiliated MPs cannot
 
-### TA-4: Centerpartiet (C) — Tier-3 Actor
+#### TA-4: Centerpartiet (C) — Tier-3 Actor
 
 **Classification**: External supply party; tier-3
 **Capability**: 24 MPs; moderate
 **Intent**: Brand-differentiation more than government-opposition
 **TTPs**: Selective issue-championing (HD10431 LGBTQI+)
 
-## Threat Landscape Matrix
+### Threat Landscape Matrix
 
 ```
         High Impact
@@ -1109,23 +1100,23 @@ Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase w
           Low Intent     High Intent
 ```
 
-## Threat Compound Effects
+### Threat Compound Effects
 
 Individual threats are analytically meaningful; **compound effects** may be greater than the sum:
 
-### Compound Effect 1: Dual-gender attack (HD10437 + HD10438)
+#### Compound Effect 1: Dual-gender attack (HD10437 + HD10438)
 Same day, same MP, same minister. Impact: forces Larsson to formulate a response that addresses both EU compliance *and* service-delivery failure — under constrained time. Impact multiplier: ~1.6x single-interpellation pressure.
 
-### Compound Effect 2: Carlson saturation (HD10434 + 5 other active)
+#### Compound Effect 2: Carlson saturation (HD10434 + 5 other active)
 Cumulative policy-area coverage. Impact: no "safe" portfolio retreat. Impact multiplier: ~2x single-interpellation pressure.
 
-### Compound Effect 3: Fiscal-social attack (HD10433 tax + HD10437 gender + HD10432 hospitals + HD10438 shelters)
+#### Compound Effect 3: Fiscal-social attack (HD10433 tax + HD10437 gender + HD10432 hospitals + HD10438 shelters)
 Constructs a unified "government failing working families" narrative. Impact multiplier: ~1.3x — dilutes focus but reinforces frame.
 
-### Compound Effect 4: Foreign-policy stress (HD10435 + HD10426 Israel death penalty)
+#### Compound Effect 4: Foreign-policy stress (HD10435 + HD10426 Israel death penalty)
 Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — keeps foreign-policy-accountability in news.
 
-## Government Counter-Threat Capabilities
+### Government Counter-Threat Capabilities
 
 | Capability | Current strength | Deployment likelihood |
 |------------|------------------|:---------------------:|
@@ -1138,7 +1129,7 @@ Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — kee
 
 **Assessment**: Government has significant counter-threat capabilities but is constrained by coalition internal dynamics. The most likely counter-move is ministerial rhetorical skill + targeted concessions (see `scenario-analysis.md`).
 
-## Threat Intelligence Indicators (IoCs) — Political-Domain Version
+### Threat Intelligence Indicators (IoCs) — Political-Domain Version
 
 | Indicator type | Examples | Watch priority |
 |----------------|---------|:--------------:|
@@ -1150,7 +1141,7 @@ Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — kee
 | **Coalition IoC** | Public statements by one coalition partner about another | HIGH |
 | **Withdrawal IoC** | Interpellation withdrawals (information-value signal) | MEDIUM |
 
-## Threat Horizon
+### Threat Horizon
 
 **Current horizon (0–14 days)**: All 10 interpellations in active-response phase. Threat level peaks May 5.
 
@@ -1158,7 +1149,7 @@ Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — kee
 
 **Long horizon (90+ days)**: Election 2026 campaign formal launch (August 2026). Interpellation narrative absorbed into campaign messaging. Post-election government formation.
 
-## Intelligence Gaps
+### Intelligence Gaps
 
 1. **Internal S communications**: Coordination structure is inferred, not observed
 2. **Coalition backchannel discussions**: Government coalition internal meetings not observed
@@ -1166,7 +1157,7 @@ Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — kee
 4. **EU Commission informal communications**: Not directly observable
 5. **Union-campaign coordination**: LO/TCO strategic planning not transparent
 
-## Analyst Confidence in Threat Assessment
+### Analyst Confidence in Threat Assessment
 
 - Threat identification: HIGH 🟩 (primary-source interpellation text available for tier-1 threats)
 - Threat actor capability: HIGH 🟩
@@ -1178,24 +1169,23 @@ Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — kee
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD10429
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10429-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10429-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10429 | **frs**: 2025/26:429
 **Datum**: 2026-04-07 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 5.5/10
 **Inlämnare**: Rashid Farivar (SD) | **Mottagare**: Justitieminister Gunnar Strömmer (M)
 **SISVA (response deadline)**: 2026-04-21
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 Rashid Farivar (SD) interpellates Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) on freedom-of-expression protections in relation to government proposition **2025/26:133**. The interpellation opens with an explicit invocation of Sweden's constitutional heritage: *"Sverige har en stolt och i många avseenden unik tradition av att värna det fria ordet. Redan 1766 fick vi världens första grundlagsskyddade tryckfrihet"* — Sweden's 1766 *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* is the oldest press-freedom constitutional act in the world. The rhetorical frame positions SD as the guardian of this tradition against alleged government overreach.
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 
 > "Vad avser ministern att göra för att säkerställa att propositionen 2025/26:133 inte leder till en försvagning av tryck- och yttrandefriheten i Sverige?"
 > (*"What does the minister intend to do to ensure that proposition 2025/26:133 does not lead to a weakening of press and freedom of expression in Sweden?"*)
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is an **inverted-expected interpellation**. SD is typically positioned as favouring stronger law-enforcement/speech-limitation measures. Here, SD is interpellating on **press-freedom** grounds — positioning themselves as **defenders of expression rights** against their own coalition's proposition. This is tactically sophisticated:
 1. Rebuts critiques that SD is anti-free-speech
@@ -1221,7 +1211,7 @@ Rashid Farivar (SD) interpellates Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) on freed
 
 **Coalition-dynamic signal** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Two SD interpellations in one week (HD10429 + HD10430) — one on expression rights against M, one on religious extremism against KD. This is **balanced pressure** across the coalition: SD is simultaneously demanding more liberty (HD10429) and more restriction (HD10430), depending on subject. The pattern reinforces SD's brand as the **"agenda-setter"** within the coalition without appearing ideologically contradictory.
 
-## Constitutional-Law Dimension
+### Constitutional-Law Dimension
 
 [HIGH confidence 🟩] Sweden's press-freedom regime has unique constitutional features:
 - *Tryckfrihetsförordningen* (TF) 1766/1949 — world's oldest
@@ -1232,7 +1222,7 @@ Rashid Farivar (SD) interpellates Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) on freed
 
 Any proposition touching these protections faces constitutional-review scrutiny (Lagrådet). SD's invocation of this heritage positions them rhetorically with a coalition that includes historic press-freedom defenders.
 
-## Response-Strategy Forecast (Strömmer, April 21)
+### Response-Strategy Forecast (Strömmer, April 21)
 
 **Most likely** (P=0.55): Strömmer defends prop 2025/26:133 as compatible with TF/YGL. Cites Lagrådet review. Emphasises narrow scope. Deflects broader free-speech concerns to other venues.
 
@@ -1240,7 +1230,7 @@ Any proposition touching these protections faces constitutional-review scrutiny
 
 **Lower probability** (P=0.15): Strömmer withdraws proposition elements or accepts amendments. Would be a notable defeat but reduces coalition friction.
 
-## Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
+### Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Significance |
 |-----------|---------|--------------|
@@ -1250,7 +1240,7 @@ Any proposition touching these protections faces constitutional-review scrutiny
 | Strömmer's rhetoric ("absolute free speech" vs "balanced") | April 21 debate | Framing indicator |
 | Åkesson public comments | 48 hrs post-debate | Party-leader signal |
 
-## Comparative Framework: Foreign-Influence Laws
+### Comparative Framework: Foreign-Influence Laws
 
 | Jurisdiction | Law | Speech impact |
 |--------------|-----|---------------|
@@ -1262,36 +1252,35 @@ Any proposition touching these protections faces constitutional-review scrutiny
 
 Sweden's historical position has been more liberal than most peers — any perceived erosion is politically charged.
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 
 **Salience**: 🟨 MODERATE-LOW — Free-speech is high-salience for elite but medium for general voter
 **Government vulnerability**: 🟢 LOW-MEDIUM — Strömmer can defend proposition on security grounds; SD won't break coalition
 **SD campaign-utility rating**: 6.0/10 — Brand-positioning more than electoral-swing value
 
-## Related Documents
+### Related Documents
 
 - Prop 2025/26:133 (not in this batch; the target document)
 - HD10430 — Mosque hate-speech (Jomshof/SD) — companion interpellation showing balanced SD pressure
 
 ### HD10430
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10430-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10430-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10430 | **frs**: 2025/26:430
 **Datum**: 2026-04-07 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 5.2/10
 **Inlämnare**: Richard Jomshof (SD) | **Mottagare**: Socialminister Jakob Forssmed (KD)
 **SISVA (response deadline)**: 2026-04-21
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 Richard Jomshof — Chair of the *Justitieutskottet* (Justice Committee) and a long-standing SD senior MP — interpellates Social Affairs Minister Jakob Forssmed (KD) on mosques that allegedly spread hate and threats. The interpellation references an *Expressen* exposé on a Sunni mosque in Kristianstad (Skåne) where an imam reportedly preached hate-incitement content. The interpellation presses the minister on government measures to prevent such institutions from operating.
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 
 > "Vilka åtgärder avser ministern och regeringen att vidta för att säkerställa att moskéer och andra trossamfund som sprider hat och hot inte får fortsätta bedriva sin verksamhet?"
 > (*"What measures do the minister and the government intend to take to ensure that mosques and other religious communities spreading hate and threats are not allowed to continue their operations?"*)
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is an **intra-coalition pressure interpellation**. SD and KD agree broadly on religious-extremism concerns, but diverge on the legal instrument and scope. Jomshof's interpellation is not designed to flip government policy — it is designed to **keep religious-extremism visible** in the run-up to Election 2026 and to signal SD's leadership on the issue to its voter base.
 
@@ -1322,7 +1311,7 @@ Forssmed cannot legally "close mosques" — only prosecute specific actors. The
 - By interpellating a KD minister (coalition partner), SD signals it is **pressing government from the right**
 - Creates headline opportunities for SD's campaign ("SD demands action against extremist mosques")
 
-## Counter-Narrative and Civil-Society Risk
+### Counter-Narrative and Civil-Society Risk
 
 [MEDIUM confidence 🟧] The interpellation carries non-trivial risks:
 - Muslim community organisations may perceive collective stigmatisation
@@ -1332,7 +1321,7 @@ Forssmed cannot legally "close mosques" — only prosecute specific actors. The
 
 **Expected progressive response**: C, V, MP will likely file opposing motions or interpellations emphasising due process and discrimination concerns.
 
-## Response-Strategy Forecast (Forssmed, April 21)
+### Response-Strategy Forecast (Forssmed, April 21)
 
 **Most likely** (P=0.60): Forssmed cites existing legal instruments, ongoing *SST* reforms, and police-led prosecutions. Emphasises rule-of-law procedures. Avoids new commitments.
 
@@ -1340,7 +1329,7 @@ Forssmed cannot legally "close mosques" — only prosecute specific actors. The
 
 **Lower probability** (P=0.10): Forssmed announces a new legal-framework review or a specific targeted mosque-oversight instrument — would require broader coalition sign-off.
 
-## Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
+### Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Significance |
 |-----------|---------|--------------|
@@ -1350,7 +1339,7 @@ Forssmed cannot legally "close mosques" — only prosecute specific actors. The
 | Muslim Council of Sweden statement | Any public reaction | Community response |
 | Headline coverage in DN/SvD/Aftonbladet | Week of April 21 | Media framing indicator |
 
-## Comparative Framework: European Approaches
+### Comparative Framework: European Approaches
 
 | Country | Approach | Outcomes |
 |---------|---------|----------|
@@ -1360,36 +1349,35 @@ Forssmed cannot legally "close mosques" — only prosecute specific actors. The
 | **Germany** | Case-by-case Verfassungsschutz | Varies by Land |
 | **Sweden** | SST funding + hate-speech prosecution | Narrow instrument |
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 
 **Salience**: 🟧 MEDIUM — High for SD base; low for swing voters
 **Government vulnerability**: 🟢 LOW — Within SD-KD policy comfort zone
 **SD campaign-utility rating**: 6.5/10 — Amplifies SD brand without requiring government concession
 
-## Related Documents
+### Related Documents
 
 - HD10429 — Freedom of expression (SD's Farivar) — thematic pair
 - SST annual report 2024 (contextual reference)
 
 ### HD10431
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10431-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10431-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10431 | **frs**: 2025/26:431
 **Datum**: 2026-04-14 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 6.0/10
 **Inlämnare**: Anna Lasses (C) | **Mottagare**: Bistånds- och utrikeshandelsminister Benjamin Dousa (M)
 **SISVA (response deadline)**: 2026-04-28
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 Anna Lasses (C) presses Development Aid and Foreign Trade Minister Benjamin Dousa (M) on Sweden's international work for the human rights of LGBTQI+ people. The interpellation cites mounting global pressure on LGBTQI+ rights defenders and the tightening operating environment for HR organisations in authoritarian contexts. This is the **only Centerpartiet (C) interpellation of the batch** — and it is deliberately positioned to signal C's differentiation from government partners on human-rights doctrine.
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 
 > "Hur avser ministern att säkerställa att Sveriges internationella arbete för hbtqi-personers mänskliga rättigheter upprätthålls och fördjupas?"
 > (*"How does the minister intend to ensure that Sweden's international work for the human rights of LGBTQI+ people is maintained and deepened?"*)
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This interpellation is **strategic positioning rather than pure accountability**. C is one of the Tidö-agreement's external supply partners (not a formal coalition member), and Lasses is using the interpellation instrument to:
 1. Signal to progressive centrist voters that C retains a distinct liberal human-rights profile
@@ -1419,7 +1407,7 @@ By asking *Dousa*, Lasses targets the M minister with maximum internal-coalition
 
 C's interpellation positions them for the first segment, tactically abandoning the second.
 
-## Accountability Dimension
+### Accountability Dimension
 
 **Will Dousa satisfy the interpellation?** [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: Dousa is likely to reaffirm Sweden's historical commitment to LGBTQI+ rights in international aid. However, *how* he phrases this matters:
 - Strong answer → Dousa signals M's liberal values; strains SD relations
@@ -1427,7 +1415,7 @@ C's interpellation positions them for the first segment, tactically abandoning t
 
 **Expected framing**: Dousa likely emphasises Sweden's overall human-rights framework (not LGBTQI+ specifically), cites ongoing Sida programmes, and avoids new commitments. This is the lowest-political-cost response.
 
-## Comparative Framework: Nordic Peers
+### Comparative Framework: Nordic Peers
 
 | Country | LGBTQI+ aid doctrine 2025 | Shift vs 2022 |
 |---------|---------------------------|---------------|
@@ -1439,7 +1427,7 @@ C's interpellation positions them for the first segment, tactically abandoning t
 
 Sweden's previous position as Nordic LGBTQI+-aid leader is slipping — the interpellation implicitly signals this.
 
-## Response-Strategy Forecast (Dousa, April 28)
+### Response-Strategy Forecast (Dousa, April 28)
 
 **Most likely** (P=0.65): Affirmative answer citing Sweden's historical role, ongoing Sida funding, and human-rights framework. No new commitments. Limited specifics.
 
@@ -1447,7 +1435,7 @@ Sweden's previous position as Nordic LGBTQI+-aid leader is slipping — the inte
 
 **Lower probability** (P=0.10): Announcement of a new LGBTQI+-specific Sida funding initiative — would be a political win for C but creates SD tension.
 
-## Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
+### Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Significance |
 |-----------|---------|--------------|
@@ -1457,37 +1445,36 @@ Sweden's previous position as Nordic LGBTQI+-aid leader is slipping — the inte
 | C polling in urban areas | 30–60 days | Campaign traction check |
 | MP/V amplification | Next 14 days | Left-flank positioning |
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 
 **Salience**: 🟨 MODERATE — Low-20s voter priority; high symbolic weight
 **Government vulnerability**: 🟡 ELEVATED — Interpellation designed to stress coalition
 **C campaign-utility rating**: 7.0/10 for *identity positioning* (higher than raw electoral salience because it distinguishes C brand)
 
-## Related Documents
+### Related Documents
 
 - HD10426 — Israel death penalty (Muranovic/S) — related HR pressure vector
 - HD10435 — Bernadotte/Israel accountability (El-Haj) — thematic overlap
 - Prior Sida annual reports (context references)
 
 ### HD10432
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10432-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10432-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10432 | **frs**: 2025/26:432
 **Datum**: 2026-04-15 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 6.5/10
 **Inlämnare**: Robert Olesen (S) | **Mottagare**: Sjukvårdsminister Elisabet Lann (KD)
 **SISVA (response deadline)**: 2026-05-05 (NEAR)
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 Robert Olesen (S) interpellates Health Minister Elisabet Lann (KD) on state guarantees for hospital-building investments. Sweden's healthcare infrastructure backbone is ageing rapidly: a substantial share of hospital buildings date from the 1960s–1970s and require either reconstruction, extension, or full replacement. The 21 *regioner* (regional authorities) carry primary financing responsibility, but rising construction costs and capital-market conditions have narrowed their borrowing capacity.
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 
 > "Vilka åtgärder avser ministern att vidta för att staten ska kunna säkerställa nödvändiga investeringar i vårdbyggnader?"
 > (*"What measures does the minister intend to take to ensure the state can secure necessary investments in healthcare buildings?"*)
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The interpellation operates at the **fiscal-federalism** pressure point in the Swedish welfare model — regions are constitutionally responsible for healthcare but fiscally constrained. By asking what the **state** will do, Olesen forces Lann into the politically charged territory of proposing either (a) direct state financing (expansion of central government responsibility, ideologically difficult for KD), or (b) explicit refusal (politically costly given hospital-closure fears).
 
@@ -1502,7 +1489,7 @@ Robert Olesen (S) interpellates Health Minister Elisabet Lann (KD) on state guar
 
 **Coalition tension vector** [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: KD's traditional position favours expanded state role in healthcare delivery (Christian Democratic "care state" tradition), but the Tidö agreement has pushed the coalition toward *regionernas självstyre* (regional self-government) framing. Lann is caught between her party's historical instincts and the coalition's operational doctrine.
 
-## Quantitative Context
+### Quantitative Context
 
 | Dimension | Value | Source |
 |-----------|-------|--------|
@@ -1512,7 +1499,7 @@ Robert Olesen (S) interpellates Health Minister Elisabet Lann (KD) on state guar
 | Construction-cost inflation 2021–2025 | +30% | SCB PPI |
 | Annual new-hospital starts (Sweden) | ~4–6 major projects | Regioner aggregated |
 
-## Comparative Dimension
+### Comparative Dimension
 
 Other Nordic peers structure hospital financing differently:
 - **Norway**: Central government owns hospital trusts (foretak) — direct state investment
@@ -1522,7 +1509,7 @@ Other Nordic peers structure hospital financing differently:
 
 The interpellation implicitly references that Sweden is **out of step** with the Nordic norm.
 
-## Response-Strategy Forecast (Lann, May 5)
+### Response-Strategy Forecast (Lann, May 5)
 
 **Most likely** (P=0.55): Lann acknowledges the investment gap, cites ongoing state-investment grants for specific projects, and emphasises *"sound regional financial management"* as the primary lever. Avoids committing to systemic state guarantees.
 
@@ -1530,7 +1517,7 @@ The interpellation implicitly references that Sweden is **out of step** with the
 
 **Lower probability** (P=0.15): Announcement of a specific state-guarantee instrument (like *Riksgälden*-backed regional bonds). This would be a significant fiscal-policy shift — would require Svantesson's endorsement.
 
-## Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
+### Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Significance |
 |-----------|---------|--------------|
@@ -1540,37 +1527,36 @@ The interpellation implicitly references that Sweden is **out of step** with the
 | Svantesson statement on regional finances | Next 30 days | Cross-portfolio signal |
 | 2026 budget healthcare line | Autumn 2026 | Budget-cycle test |
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 
 **Salience**: 🟧 MEDIUM-HIGH — Healthcare ranks top-3 voter concern consistently; specific hospital case studies mobilise regional voters
 **Government vulnerability**: 🟧 MEDIUM — Structural issue predates Tidö; can be deflected to long-term planning
 **S campaign-utility rating**: 6.5/10 — Substantial issue, harder to operationalise into single headline; risk of "abstract policy debate"
 
-## Related Documents
+### Related Documents
 
 - HD10415 — *Statligt säkerställande av bra vård* (prior Olesen interpellation to Lann)
 - frs 2024/25 healthcare-budget lines (prior motions)
 - SKR "Ekonomirapporten" 2024 (context reference)
 
 ### HD10433
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10433-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10433-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10433 | **frs**: 2025/26:433
 **Datum**: 2026-04-15 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 7.8/10
 **Inlämnare**: Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S) | **Mottagare**: Finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 **SISVA (response deadline)**: 2026-04-29 (9 days remaining)
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S) — a tax-committee specialist — presses Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) on the "legitimacy, efficiency and distributional profile" (*legitimitet, effektivitet och fördelningsprofil*) of the Swedish tax system. The interpellation frames a systemic paradox: Sweden taxes labour income at one of Europe's highest effective marginal rates while hosting **one of the world's highest per-capita densities of billionaires** (Credit Suisse/Forbes estimates place Sweden in the global top-3 per-capita, behind only Monaco and Switzerland).
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 
 > "Avser ministern att verka för en bred översyn av det svenska skattesystemet i syfte att öka dess legitimitet och effektivitet?"
 > (*"Does the minister intend to work for a broad review of the Swedish tax system with the aim of increasing its legitimacy and efficiency?"*)
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The interpellation is an **ideological accountability ambush** rather than a narrow policy question. By asking Svantesson to endorse a "broad tax review," Ekeroth Clausson forces the minister into a binary choice:
 - Accept → signals that current tax doctrine is failing (politically damaging for M)
@@ -1604,7 +1590,7 @@ S's electoral argument writes itself: *"Why are working Swedes subsidising wealt
 
 **Accountability dimension**: Whatever Svantesson says, S will have a sound-bite. If she promises a review → S claims victory; if she rejects → S has campaign material.
 
-## Structural Data: Sweden Tax Legitimacy
+### Structural Data: Sweden Tax Legitimacy
 
 | Indicator | Value | Source | Confidence |
 |-----------|-------|--------|-----------|
@@ -1617,7 +1603,7 @@ S's electoral argument writes itself: *"Why are working Swedes subsidising wealt
 
 **Interpretation**: Disposable-income Gini is moderate (EU average); wealth Gini is among the highest in Europe. The interpellation implicitly targets the wealth dimension, where S's argument is strongest.
 
-## Analytic Framework: Social-Contract Tension
+### Analytic Framework: Social-Contract Tension
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1634,7 +1620,7 @@ graph LR
     style E fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
+### Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Watch window | Analytical significance |
 |-----------|--------------|------------------------|
@@ -1644,7 +1630,7 @@ graph LR
 | Finansdepartementet budget preview | May 2026 | Tactical tax-policy announcement |
 | Skatteverket analytical publications | Rolling | Structural-data releases |
 
-## Response-Strategy Forecast (Svantesson, April 29)
+### Response-Strategy Forecast (Svantesson, April 29)
 
 **Most likely** (P=0.60): Svantesson announces willingness to "look at targeted elements" without committing to a systemic review. Defends the 2025 budget as "broad-based relief" for ordinary workers. Cites 2026 budget preparation as forum for continued dialogue.
 
@@ -1652,31 +1638,30 @@ graph LR
 
 **Lower probability** (P=0.15): Announcement of a formal *utredning* (government inquiry) into tax-system legitimacy — this would be a strategic concession but gives S a year of narrative control.
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 
 **Salience**: 🟩 HIGH — Fairness framing, top-10 voter issue, sharp ideological contrast
 **Government vulnerability**: 🟧 MEDIUM — Svantesson is skilled; 3:12 is defensible; timeline favours government (budget in autumn)
 **S campaign-utility rating**: 7.8/10 — Strong systemic argument, harder to "quick-win" in single debate
 
 ### HD10434
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10434-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10434-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10434 | **frs**: 2025/26:434
 **Datum**: 2026-04-15 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 7.2/10
 **Inlämnare**: Leif Nysmed (S) | **Mottagare**: Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister Andreas Carlson (KD)
 **SISVA (response deadline)**: 2026-04-29 (9 days remaining as of analysis date)
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 Leif Nysmed (S), a Stockholm-county S MP with a track record of housing-policy interpellations, targets Infrastructure/Housing Minister Andreas Carlson (KD) on the 900-unit year-on-year decline in Stockholm-region housing starts. The interpellation relies on Länsstyrelsen Stockholm's municipality-aggregated forecast: 11,091 starts in 2026 vs ~12,000 in 2025. This is Carlson's 6th+ interpellation of the session and the first quantitatively grounded housing-specific one.
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 
 > "Vilka åtgärder avser ministern och regeringen att vidta för att öka bostadsbyggandet i Stockholmsregionen?"
 > (*"What measures do the minister and the government intend to take to increase housing construction in the Stockholm region?"*)
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The 900-unit decline is a **government-source-confirmed metric** (Länsstyrelsen Stockholm is a state authority under the Ministry of Finance), which removes the government's standard rhetorical defence that opposition housing statistics are contested. Carlson cannot dispute the baseline. This transforms the interpellation from a policy debate into an accountability test: either Carlson announces concrete counter-measures by April 29, or the decline becomes the headline.
 
@@ -1703,7 +1688,7 @@ The pattern is not random: S is systematically covering **every sub-portfolio**
 3. (P=0.40) Pivot to national aggregates where 2026 shows marginal increase in other regions
 4. (P=0.20) Concede the decline and announce an emergency package (politically costly for KD)
 
-## Quantitative Context
+### Quantitative Context
 
 | Metric | 2024 | 2025 (est.) | 2026 (forecast) | YoY % change 25→26 |
 |--------|------|-------------|-----------------|---------------------|
@@ -1713,7 +1698,7 @@ The pattern is not random: S is systematically covering **every sub-portfolio**
 
 **Derived indicator**: Stockholm is **underperforming the national trend**, which weakens the government's "national cycle" defence.
 
-## Cross-Interpellation Linkage
+### Cross-Interpellation Linkage
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1730,7 +1715,7 @@ graph TD
     style NARRATIVE fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
+### Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Significance |
 |-----------|---------|--------------|
@@ -1740,29 +1725,28 @@ graph TD
 | Länsstyrelsen press releases | New municipality warnings | Ground-truth confirmation |
 | LO/Byggnads union statements | Coordinated attack | S-union alignment signal |
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 
 **Salience**: 🟩 HIGH — Top-5 Stockholm-voter issue; 29-seat swing region
 **Government vulnerability**: 🔴 HIGH — State-source data; narrow rhetorical options
 **S campaign-utility rating**: 8.5/10 — Concrete, local, quantified, accountable to a named minister
 
 ### HD10435
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10435-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10435-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10435 | **frs**: 2025/26:435  
 **Datum**: 2026-04-16 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 9.0/10  
 **Inlämnare**: Jamal El-Haj (-) | **Mottagare**: Utrikesminister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 The most substantive and historically ambitious interpellation of the batch. Independent MP El-Haj (former S member) demands that Sweden's government require Israel to: (1) accept accountability for the 1948 Bernadotte assassination, (2) issue public apology, and (3) pay financial compensation to the Bernadotte family.
 
-## Three Explicit Demands (from full text)
+### Three Explicit Demands (from full text)
 1. *"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att staten Israel tar ansvar för mordet på Folke Bernadotte?"*
 2. *"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att Israel framför en offentlig ursäkt till familjen Bernadotte och till Sverige?"*  
 3. *"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att Israel utger ekonomisk kompensation till Bernadottes familj?"*
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Historical background** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Count Folke Bernadotte, Swedish diplomat and UN mediator, was assassinated by the Lehi (Stern Gang) paramilitary group on September 17, 1948 in Jerusalem. The murderers were never prosecuted — one (Yitzhak Shamir) later became Israeli Prime Minister. The interpellation cites that perpetrators were decorated with a "tapperhetsmedalj" (valor medal) for their role in "contributing to Israel's founding."
 
@@ -1772,7 +1756,7 @@ The most substantive and historically ambitious interpellation of the batch. Ind
 
 **Identity of filer** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Jamal El-Haj is listed as independent (-). He was previously associated with S before breaking over Israel-Palestine policy. His willingness to file this interpellation without S party endorsement indicates that S party leadership calculated the demands are too diplomatically extreme for official opposition policy.
 
-## Accountability Assessment
+### Accountability Assessment
 **Will government comply with demands?** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Almost certainly not. Sweden will acknowledge the historical events and maintain its criticism of current Israeli policies, but demanding formal apology and compensation is a diplomatic step not supported by current Swedish foreign policy doctrine.
 
 **Will this embarrass Malmer Stenergard?** [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: The response window (April 30) creates media attention. If the minister gives a weak or evasive answer to three explicit numbered demands, opposition MPs can point to the specific unanswered questions.
@@ -1781,20 +1765,19 @@ The most substantive and historically ambitious interpellation of the batch. Ind
 **ANM**: April 21, 2026
 
 ### HD10436
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10436-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10436-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10436 | **frs**: 2025/26:436
 **Datum**: 2026-04-16 | **Status**: **ÅTERTAGEN (WITHDRAWN)** | **Significance**: 4.0/10 (significance derives from withdrawal pattern, not content)
 **Inlämnare**: Mats Wiking (S) | **Mottagare**: Gymnasie-, högskole- och forskningsminister Lotta Edholm (L)
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 Mats Wiking (S) filed this interpellation on measures to strengthen Sweden's space industry, then **withdrew** it before chamber announcement. The original text emphasised the growing societal importance of space (satellite data, defence-linked infrastructure) and the strategic significance of the Kiruna/Esrange complex as NATO's only operational European satellite-launch site for small launchers.
 
 Because the interpellation was withdrawn, its **political signal** — rather than its policy substance — becomes the analytic focus.
 
-## Why Withdrawals Matter
+### Why Withdrawals Matter
 
 In Swedish parliamentary practice, interpellations are rarely withdrawn. Withdrawal patterns (*återtagen*) typically signal one of four conditions:
 
@@ -1813,7 +1796,7 @@ For HD10436, the most likely explanations (ranked by probability):
 
 **Low probability** (P=0.05): **Internal party coordination**. S leadership may have reviewed the strategic fit and decided this interpellation was off-message.
 
-## Strategic Context: Sweden's Space Industry
+### Strategic Context: Sweden's Space Industry
 
 [HIGH confidence 🟩]
 - Esrange (Kiruna) — Europe's only mainland-based operational sounding-rocket site; rapidly developing small-satellite launch capability
@@ -1831,7 +1814,7 @@ For HD10436, the most likely explanations (ranked by probability):
 
 A lone backbench interpellation cannot do justice to this complexity — which partially explains why it may have been withdrawn in favour of more focused attacks.
 
-## Actor Profile: Mats Wiking
+### Actor Profile: Mats Wiking
 
 [HIGH confidence 🟩]
 - S MP from Västra Götalands län norra
@@ -1840,7 +1823,7 @@ A lone backbench interpellation cannot do justice to this complexity — which p
 - Possible professional interest in space/industrial policy
 - Withdrawal behaviour consistent with collaborative rather than antagonistic positioning
 
-## Target Profile: Lotta Edholm
+### Target Profile: Lotta Edholm
 
 [HIGH confidence 🟩]
 - L Minister for Higher Education and Research
@@ -1850,7 +1833,7 @@ A lone backbench interpellation cannot do justice to this complexity — which p
 
 The combination (non-confrontational S MP + collaborative L minister + strategically important sector) favours the "negotiated resolution" hypothesis.
 
-## Intelligence Value of the Withdrawal
+### Intelligence Value of the Withdrawal
 
 **Counter-intelligence reading**: The withdrawal itself is a **positive signal** for the government's space-industry policy trajectory. It suggests:
 1. Informal cross-party consensus is functional on strategic industrial policy
@@ -1860,7 +1843,7 @@ The combination (non-confrontational S MP + collaborative L minister + strategic
 
 For the S campaign narrative, this is a notable *absence*: S has no concrete accountability material on space industry to deploy in Election 2026 messaging.
 
-## Comparative Context: Space-Industry Politics in Nordic Peers
+### Comparative Context: Space-Industry Politics in Nordic Peers
 
 | Country | Space policy profile | Political salience |
 |---------|---------------------|---------------------|
@@ -1871,7 +1854,7 @@ For the S campaign narrative, this is a notable *absence*: S has no concrete acc
 
 Sweden's position as a launch-host nation is unique in the Nordic peer group and creates strategic leverage within EU and NATO space cooperation.
 
-## Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
+### Intelligence Indicators to Monitor
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Significance |
 |-----------|---------|--------------|
@@ -1881,31 +1864,30 @@ Sweden's position as a launch-host nation is unique in the Nordic peer group and
 | GKN Aerospace announcements | Rolling | Industry-trajectory signal |
 | NATO Space Centre updates | Rolling | Alliance-level indicator |
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 
 **Salience**: 🟢 LOW (direct) / 🟧 MEDIUM (via defence/industry framing)
 **Government vulnerability**: 🟢 LOW — Withdrawal signals no current exploitable failure
 **S campaign-utility rating**: 3.0/10 — Not deployable in current form
 
-## Methodological Note
+### Methodological Note
 
 This analysis treats the **withdrawal itself** as the primary analytical object. In political-intelligence practice, non-events and withdrawals often carry higher signal-to-noise ratios than routine filings because they reveal behind-the-scenes coordination. Monitoring *pattern* deviations (e.g., the ratio of filed vs withdrawn interpellations per party per session) can surface strategic inflection points that raw filing counts miss.
 
 ### HD10437
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10437-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10437-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10437 | **frs**: 2025/26:437  
 **Datum**: 2026-04-17 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 9.2/10
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L) on Sweden's failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive. The government withdrew its own implementation proposal, and Sweden will not meet the EU deadline.
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 > "Varför väljer ministern och regeringen att inte implementera direktivet?"  
 > ("Why does the minister and the government choose not to implement the directive?")
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is the most legally and politically consequential interpellation of the batch. The EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive 2023/970/EU) entered into force in June 2023 with a transposition deadline of June 7, 2026. Sweden's government WITHDREW its implementation proposal, meaning the directive will NOT be implemented on time. This creates: (1) EU infringement risk, (2) electoral vulnerability for coalition on gender equality, and (3) a documented policy failure that S can use in campaign materials.
 
@@ -1916,7 +1898,7 @@ Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L) on Sweden
 **Response deadline**: May 5, 2026 (SISVA)  
 **ANM (announced to chamber)**: April 21, 2026
 
-## Mermaid Diagram: EU Directive Compliance Timeline
+### Mermaid Diagram: EU Directive Compliance Timeline
 
 ```mermaid
 gantt
@@ -1933,26 +1915,25 @@ gantt
     Minister response deadline        :crit, 2026-05-05, 1d
 ```
 
-## Election 2026 Implication
+### Election 2026 Implication
 **Salience**: 🟦 VERY HIGH — Pay equity is top-5 women voters issue  
 **Government vulnerability**: The withdrawal of the proposal is irrevocable — no spin possible
 
 ### HD10438
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10438-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10438-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10438 | **frs**: 2025/26:438  
 **Datum**: 2026-04-17 | **Status**: Skickad | **Significance**: 8.5/10  
 **Inlämnare**: Sofia Amloh (S) | **Mottagare**: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson (L) on the nationwide closure of women's shelters (kvinnojourer). Civil society organizations critical to gender-based violence prevention are shutting down due to funding gaps.
 
-## Key Question (direct from document)
+### Key Question (direct from document)
 > "Hur tänker ministern agera för att kvinnojourer inte ska behöva lägga ned sin viktiga verksamhet?"  
 > ("How does the minister intend to act so that women's shelters do not have to close their important operations?")
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Core finding** [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Women's shelters in Sweden are operated by "idéburna organisationer" (civil society/non-profit organizations). Many are closing due to inadequate state funding. The interpellation frames this as a direct failure of the government's anti-violence against women strategy. The consequence cited: "stora konsekvenser för möjligheten att lämna en våldsam relation" (major consequences for the ability to leave a violent relationship).
 
@@ -1966,15 +1947,14 @@ Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson (L) on the n
 **ANM**: April 21, 2026 (same as HD10437 — simultaneous chamber announcement)
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Analysis date**: 2026-04-20 | **Focus**: HD10437 (frs 2025/26:437) in EU comparative context
 **AI-FIRST iterations**: 2
 
 This document places Sweden's apparent Pay Transparency Directive transposition failure in comparative EU context, which materially strengthens (or weakens) the political-accountability narrative. Directive 2023/970/EU — the "Pay Transparency Directive" — was adopted on 10 May 2023 with a **transposition deadline of 7 June 2026** (Art. 34).
 
-## Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)
+### Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)
 
 Core obligations on Member States:
 - Mandatory gender pay-gap reporting for employers ≥100 workers (phased by size)
@@ -1985,7 +1965,7 @@ Core obligations on Member States:
 - Compensation for workers for proven discrimination (no ceiling)
 - Member-state designation of enforcement bodies
 
-## Transposition Status Across Selected Member States
+### Transposition Status Across Selected Member States
 
 *Based on public legislative tracking as of April 2026 — [MEDIUM confidence 🟧] due to the rapidly-shifting transposition landscape. Sources: Member State government websites, European Commission DG EMPL communications, national union reports.*
 
@@ -2006,7 +1986,7 @@ Core obligations on Member States:
 
 **Confidence** [MEDIUM 🟧]: Transposition tracking requires continuous monitoring; some Member States may have made progress not yet publicly reported. The general picture — that Sweden, Poland, and Hungary are the most visibly behind — is robust.
 
-## Strategic Comparative Takeaway
+### Strategic Comparative Takeaway
 
 Sweden's transposition failure is **not an isolated underperformance**. Poland and Hungary also appear likely to miss the deadline. However, the political significance is different:
 
@@ -2015,7 +1995,7 @@ Sweden's transposition failure is **not an isolated underperformance**. Poland a
 
 This means Sweden's failure carries **higher reputational cost per unit of non-compliance** than Poland's or Hungary's. The EU political economy treats a Swedish gender-equality failure as more damaging to the directive's legitimacy than an Eastern European failure.
 
-## Gender Pay Gap Comparative Context
+### Gender Pay Gap Comparative Context
 
 *Eurostat unadjusted gender pay gap data, most recent available (2023):*
 
@@ -2038,7 +2018,7 @@ This means Sweden's failure carries **higher reputational cost per unit of non-c
 - However, the interpellation's own text (frs 2025/26:437) notes the gap is *"bestående och har till och med ökat de senaste åren"* (persistent and has even increased in recent years) — a specifically Swedish trend-reversal
 - This means: Sweden is comparatively good but *getting worse*, which amplifies the political cost of failing the directive that is meant to reverse the trend
 
-## Legal-Regulatory Environment Comparison
+### Legal-Regulatory Environment Comparison
 
 | Dimension | Sweden (current) | EU Directive (required by 7 Jun 2026) | Gap |
 |-----------|-------------------|---------------------------------------|-----|
@@ -2052,7 +2032,7 @@ This means Sweden's failure carries **higher reputational cost per unit of non-c
 
 **Finding**: Sweden's *lönekartläggning* obligation under *Diskrimineringslagen* is an **early-mover strength**, but the directive's broader scope (recruitment, worker-information rights, compensation, burden of proof) is **not currently met**. Transposition is substantive, not merely formal.
 
-## Trade Union and Civil Society Comparative Response
+### Trade Union and Civil Society Comparative Response
 
 | Country | Trade union position | Employer position |
 |---------|---------------------|-------------------|
@@ -2064,7 +2044,7 @@ This means Sweden's failure carries **higher reputational cost per unit of non-c
 
 **Sweden-specific observation**: Amloh's interpellation (HD10437) is consistent with LO/TCO positioning. The coordinated S–union alignment is a standard Social Democratic play and is facilitated by the interpellation creating a documented minister-accountability record that unions can cite.
 
-## Infringement Risk Assessment
+### Infringement Risk Assessment
 
 If Sweden misses the June 7 deadline, the European Commission has standard infringement procedure options:
 1. **Letter of Formal Notice** (Month 1–3 after deadline)
@@ -2076,13 +2056,13 @@ If Sweden misses the June 7 deadline, the European Commission has standard infri
 
 **Political significance for Election 2026**: Any EU Commission communication during the campaign window (summer 2026) becomes domestic-political ammunition. S's interpellation strategy is timed to create a documentary record *before* this EU process starts, positioning S as the domestic accountability actor and the Commission as the external authority.
 
-## Lessons from Cross-Country Patterns
+### Lessons from Cross-Country Patterns
 
 - **Ireland and Spain** demonstrate that early transposition is possible even in countries with complex industrial relations. The Irish approach (employer-driven reporting with statutory framework) is a viable model that Sweden could replicate rapidly.
 - **France and Germany** show that late-but-active transposition reduces political cost — the problem is **withdrawal of a proposal with no replacement**, which is Sweden's specific situation.
 - **Denmark and Finland** demonstrate that tripartite-negotiation models (Nordic tradition) can produce on-time transposition — raising the question of why Sweden's tripartite structure has not delivered here.
 
-## Recommendations for the Published Article
+### Recommendations for the Published Article
 
 The article should explicitly include:
 1. Sweden's transposition failure in EU context (not an isolated issue, but politically more costly per unit)
@@ -2091,7 +2071,7 @@ The article should explicitly include:
 4. The Irish and Spanish early-transposition models as viable alternatives
 5. The infringement-timeline implications for Election 2026 messaging
 
-## References
+### References
 
 - Directive (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 to strengthen the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms
 - Eurostat: Gender pay gap statistics (2023 most recent)
@@ -2102,14 +2082,13 @@ The article should explicitly include:
 **Confidence grade**: MEDIUM–HIGH 🟧🟩 — Directive and Swedish law facts are HIGH; cross-country transposition status is MEDIUM due to rapidly-shifting legislative landscape across 27 Member States
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Total Interpellations**: 10
 
-## Classification by Policy Domain
+### Classification by Policy Domain
 
-### 🔴 TIER 1 — High Electoral Impact (Pre-Election 2026 Salience)
+#### 🔴 TIER 1 — High Electoral Impact (Pre-Election 2026 Salience)
 
 | dok_id | frs | Policy Domain | Electoral Salience | Key Risk |
 |--------|-----|---------------|-------------------|----------|
@@ -2117,7 +2096,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **HD10438** | frs 2025/26:438 | Gender Equality / Women's Safety | 🟩 HIGH | Women's shelters (kvinnojourer) closing nationwide — direct connection to gender-based violence prevention |
 | **HD10433** | frs 2025/26:433 | Fiscal Policy / Tax Fairness | 🟩 HIGH | Sweden has most billionaires per capita while taxing labor heavily — social contract legitimacy crisis |
 
-### 🟡 TIER 2 — Significant Political Accountability Issues
+#### 🟡 TIER 2 — Significant Political Accountability Issues
 
 | dok_id | frs | Policy Domain | Electoral Salience | Key Risk |
 |--------|-----|---------------|-------------------|----------|
@@ -2126,7 +2105,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **HD10432** | frs 2025/26:432 | Healthcare Infrastructure | 🟧 MEDIUM | Hospital investment crisis — 1960s buildings, no state guarantee mechanism |
 | **HD10431** | frs 2025/26:431 | Foreign Aid / Human Rights | 🟧 MEDIUM | LGBTQ+ rights under global pressure — Dousa's (M) foreign aid alignment questioned |
 
-### 🟢 TIER 3 — Government Accountability / Opposition Scrutiny
+#### 🟢 TIER 3 — Government Accountability / Opposition Scrutiny
 
 | dok_id | frs | Policy Domain | Status |
 |--------|-----|---------------|--------|
@@ -2134,7 +2113,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **HD10429** | frs 2025/26:429 | Freedom of Expression / Justice | SD presses on proposition 2025/26:133 and press freedom tradition |
 | **HD10436** | frs 2025/26:436 | Research Policy / Space Industry | **WITHDRAWN** — Politically significant: S withdrew space industry interpellation suggesting negotiated resolution or internal pressure |
 
-## Classification by Submitting Party
+### Classification by Submitting Party
 
 | Party | Count | Strategy | Ministers Targeted |
 |-------|-------|----------|-------------------|
@@ -2143,7 +2122,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **C (Centerpartiet)** | 1 | Human rights/development aid | Dousa (M) |
 | **Independent (-)** | 1 | Foreign policy accountability — Bernadotte/Israel | Malmer Stenergard (M) |
 
-## Document Confidence Scores
+### Document Confidence Scores
 
 | dok_id | Significance | Evidence Quality | Confidence |
 |--------|-------------|-----------------|-----------|
@@ -2158,9 +2137,9 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD10429 | 5/10 | Summary data — freedom of expression prop 2025/26:133 | [MEDIUM] |
 | HD10436 | 3/10 | WITHDRAWN — politically significant absence | [HIGH] |
 
-## Secondary Classification Dimensions
+### Secondary Classification Dimensions
 
-### By Accountability Target Type
+#### By Accountability Target Type
 
 | Target type | Count | dok_ids |
 |-------------|:-----:|---------|
@@ -2171,7 +2150,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **Security / Civil-liberties balance** | 2 | HD10429 (expression), HD10430 (extremism) |
 | **Industrial policy** (withdrawn) | 1 | HD10436 |
 
-### By Strategic Function
+#### By Strategic Function
 
 | Function | Description | dok_ids |
 |----------|-------------|---------|
@@ -2181,7 +2160,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **Base-mobilisation** | Speaks to party's voter base | HD10430 (SD base), HD10438 (S female voters) |
 | **Saturation-targeting** | Denies minister any safe policy area | HD10434 (6th+ Carlson interpellation) |
 
-### By Evidence Density
+#### By Evidence Density
 
 Interpellations with the highest evidence density (verifiable data points referenced in the text) are the hardest to refute and therefore most durable for accountability purposes:
 
@@ -2194,7 +2173,7 @@ Interpellations with the highest evidence density (verifiable data points refere
 | 5 | HD10438 | MEDIUM | "runt om i landet" (nationwide) — qualitative; would be HIGH with specific closures |
 | 6–10 | Others | MEDIUM / LOW | Thematic rather than quantitative |
 
-### By Coalition Stress Vector
+#### By Coalition Stress Vector
 
 The interpellations place different amounts of stress on different coalition fault lines:
 
@@ -2208,24 +2187,24 @@ The interpellations place different amounts of stress on different coalition fau
 | M ↔ Security vs liberty | HD10429 | 🟡 LOW–MED |
 | SD–KD ↔ Religious oversight instruments | HD10430 | 🟡 LOW–MED |
 
-## Strategic Classification Patterns
+### Strategic Classification Patterns
 
-### Pattern 1: Amloh Dual-Filing
+#### Pattern 1: Amloh Dual-Filing
 Two interpellations filed by the same MP (Sofia Amloh, S) on the same day against the same minister (Nina Larsson, L) on related themes. **Frequency of such dual-filings in rm 2025/26**: This is the first observed instance. This is the defining coordination signal of the wave.
 
-### Pattern 2: Carlson Saturation
+#### Pattern 2: Carlson Saturation
 Andreas Carlson (KD) is the target of 6+ active interpellations in this session across 5 distinct policy sub-areas (housing, aviation, rail, roads, defence infrastructure). **Frequency**: Unprecedented in the 2022–2026 Tidö government. Previous most-targeted minister was the 2023 Justice Minister with 4 interpellations over 6 weeks.
 
-### Pattern 3: Independent-MP Escalation
+#### Pattern 3: Independent-MP Escalation
 Jamal El-Haj (-) — former S, now independent — filing a high-impact foreign-policy interpellation with specific demands. **Frequency**: Rare but not unprecedented. The independent platform allows demands that a party-affiliated MP would not make (for party-discipline reasons).
 
-### Pattern 4: SD Inverted Pressure
+#### Pattern 4: SD Inverted Pressure
 SD filed two interpellations simultaneously on opposite speech-regulation sides (HD10429 free-speech against M; HD10430 religious-extremism against KD). **Frequency**: Deliberate pattern; signals SD's "balanced agenda-setting" brand positioning.
 
-### Pattern 5: Tactical Withdrawal
+#### Pattern 5: Tactical Withdrawal
 HD10436 withdrawn by S after filing. **Frequency**: Rare; typically 1–3 per session out of 400+ filings. Signals either informal resolution or tactical re-prioritisation.
 
-## Classification Confidence Audit
+### Classification Confidence Audit
 
 - All 10 documents assigned to Tier 1/2/3 with explicit evidence
 - All classifications cross-checked against document full text (where available)
@@ -2236,14 +2215,13 @@ HD10436 withdrawn by S after filing. **Frequency**: Rare; typically 1–3 per se
 **Overall classification confidence**: 🟩 HIGH (primary-source evidence for 5 of 10; metadata evidence for 5)
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Purpose**: Connect interpellations to policy patterns, minister records, and prior session events
 
-## Thematic Cross-Reference Clusters
+### Thematic Cross-Reference Clusters
 
-### Cluster 1: Gender Equality & EU Compliance
+#### Cluster 1: Gender Equality & EU Compliance
 ```
 frs 2025/26:437 (HD10437) ─── Pay Transparency Directive failure ─── Nina Larsson (L)
 frs 2025/26:438 (HD10438) ─── Women's shelter closures ─────────── Nina Larsson (L)
@@ -2255,7 +2233,7 @@ frs 2025/26:438 (HD10438) ─── Women's shelter closures ──────
 
 **Supporting context**: Sweden has a persistent gender pay gap. EU directive gives structural mechanism to address it. Government withdrawal of implementation = documented policy failure.
 
-### Cluster 2: Andreas Carlson Infrastructure Accountability
+#### Cluster 2: Andreas Carlson Infrastructure Accountability
 ```
 frs 2025/26:434 (HD10434) ─── Stockholm housing decline (-900 units)
 frs 2025/26:428 (HD10428) ─── Scandinavian Mountain Airport emergency base [from prev batch]
@@ -2266,7 +2244,7 @@ frs 2025/26:417 (HD10417) ─── Södra stambanan double track [from prev bat
 ```
 **Pattern**: Six+ interpellations targeting Carlson over 4 weeks. S is building a comprehensive "infrastructure failure" narrative. Each interpellation adds a new failure domain: airports, rail, roads, housing, defense logistics.
 
-### Cluster 3: Foreign Policy & Human Rights
+#### Cluster 3: Foreign Policy & Human Rights
 ```
 frs 2025/26:435 (HD10435) ─── Folke Bernadotte/Israel (El-Haj, -) ─── Malmer Stenergard (M)
 frs 2025/26:431 (HD10431) ─── LGBTQ+ rights/foreign aid (Lasses, C) ─ Benjamin Dousa (M)
@@ -2274,21 +2252,21 @@ frs 2025/26:426 (HD10426) ─── Israel death penalty (prev batch) ───
 ```
 **Pattern**: Two independent streams targeting Swedish foreign policy on Israel-Palestine and human rights. El-Haj connects HD10435 explicitly to HD10426 (citing same Israeli death penalty legislation). This creates a thematic arc across multiple sessions.
 
-### Cluster 4: Healthcare & Social Infrastructure
+#### Cluster 4: Healthcare & Social Infrastructure
 ```
 frs 2025/26:432 (HD10432) ─── Hospital building investment crisis ─── Elisabet Lann (KD)
 frs 2025/26:415 (HD10415) ─── Statligt säkerställande av bra vård [from prev batch] ─ Lann (KD)
 ```
 **Pattern**: S's Robert Olesen has now filed two interpellations against the same KD health minister on related hospital infrastructure topics. Clear coordinated strategy.
 
-### Cluster 5: Economic Policy & Social Contract
+#### Cluster 5: Economic Policy & Social Contract
 ```
 frs 2025/26:433 (HD10433) ─── Tax reform (S) ──────────────────── Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 frs 2025/26:421 (HD10421) ─── Integration policy (S) [prev batch] ─ Svantesson (M)
 ```
 **Pattern**: Svantesson (M) faces attacks on both tax fairness and integration policy — the economic and social dimensions of the pre-election debate.
 
-## Minister Response Status
+### Minister Response Status
 
 | Minister | Party | Active Interpellations | Responses Received | Response Rate |
 |---------|-------|----------------------|-------------------|--------------|
@@ -2303,21 +2281,20 @@ frs 2025/26:421 (HD10421) ─── Integration policy (S) [prev batch] ─ Svan
 
 **NOTE**: All interpellations have status "Skickad" (sent). No minister responses recorded yet. This reflects the statutory timeline — responses are due April 29 to May 5. Search for anföranden by minister names returned no results, confirming no formal responses have been given in chamber debates yet.
 
-## MCP Cross-Reference Notes
+### MCP Cross-Reference Notes
 
 - `search_anforanden` for minister names (Nina Larsson, Maria Malmer Stenergard) returned 0 results — consistent with "Skickad" status
 - `get_calendar_events` returned HTML instead of JSON (API known issue) — debate scheduling cannot be confirmed via API
 - `get_sync_status` confirmed live data as of 2026-04-20 07:14 UTC
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Analysis date**: 2026-04-20 | **Workflow**: `news-interpellations` (agentic workflow) + reference-class expansion
 **AI-FIRST iterations**: 2 (pass 1 + pass 2 improvement), plus post-review expansion pass
 **Purpose**: Document the analytic pipeline, its strengths and limitations, and lessons for future interpellation-debates runs
 
-## Pipeline Overview
+### Pipeline Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -2347,7 +2324,7 @@ graph TD
     X --> Y[Final review + publish]
 ```
 
-## Data Sources and Provenance
+### Data Sources and Provenance
 
 | Source | Purpose | Status | Confidence grade |
 |--------|---------|--------|:----------------:|
@@ -2360,7 +2337,7 @@ graph TD
 | `search_regering` (Regeringskansliet) | Government-side docs | ✅ Worked | 🟩 HIGH |
 | European Commission DG EMPL | Directive transposition tracking | ⚠️ External source, not via MCP | 🟧 MEDIUM |
 
-## Structured Analytic Techniques Applied
+### Structured Analytic Techniques Applied
 
 | Technique | Artifact | Value delivered |
 |-----------|----------|-----------------|
@@ -2378,11 +2355,11 @@ graph TD
 | **Comparative international** | `comparative-international.md` | Peer-benchmark |
 | **Per-document deep dives** (10) | `documents/*.md` | Granular evidence |
 
-## AI-FIRST Iteration Log
+### AI-FIRST Iteration Log
 
 The AI-FIRST principle mandates **minimum 2 complete iterations** with genuine critical re-evaluation between iterations.
 
-### Pass 1 — Initial generation (~45 minutes of allocated compute)
+#### Pass 1 — Initial generation (~45 minutes of allocated compute)
 
 - Generated 9 top-level artifacts
 - Generated 3 per-document analyses (HD10435, HD10437, HD10438 only — highest significance)
@@ -2398,8 +2375,7 @@ The AI-FIRST principle mandates **minimum 2 complete iterations** with genuine c
 - Red Team: partial (in SWOT 'threats' column only)
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-20 07:16 UTC  
 **Analysis Type**: interpellations  
@@ -2407,7 +2383,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26  
 **Data Sources**: riksdag-regering-mcp (get_interpellationer, get_dokument, get_dokument_innehall, World Bank)
 
-## Key Documents Analyzed (New Since Last Run 2026-04-14)
+### Key Documents Analyzed (New Since Last Run 2026-04-14)
 
 | dok_id | frs ID | Titel | Datum | Inlämnare | Mottagare | Status |
 |--------|--------|-------|-------|-----------|-----------|--------|
@@ -2422,7 +2398,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD10430 | frs 2025/26:430 | Moskéer som sprider hat och hot | 2026-04-07 | Richard Jomshof (SD) | Jakob Forssmed (KD) | Skickad |
 | HD10429 | frs 2025/26:429 | Skyddet för yttrandefriheten | 2026-04-07 | Rashid Farivar (SD) | Gunnar Strömmer (M) | Skickad |
 
-## Response Deadlines
+### Response Deadlines
 
 | dok_id | Sista svarsdatum | Days Remaining | Urgency |
 |--------|-----------------|----------------|---------|
@@ -2432,5 +2408,34 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD10437 | 2026-05-05 | 15 days | 🟡 NEAR |
 | HD10438 | 2026-05-05 | 15 days | 🟡 NEAR |
 
-## Calendar API Status
+### Calendar API Status
 Calendar API returned HTML instead of JSON (known Riksdagen API issue). ANM date for HD10437/HD10438 is 2026-04-21 (tomorrow).
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10429-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10430-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10431-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10432-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10433-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10434-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10435-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10436-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10437-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10438-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/article.md
index 7013ad7353..94ccb94be3 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-20
 subfolder: motions
 slug: 2026-04-20-motions
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.876Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.674Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -35,13 +34,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed **21 coordinated counter-motions** against the government's spring legislative package — the **most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive of the 2025/26 riksmöte**. The **headline finding** is a historically rare **four-party convergence on a single proposition** (prop. 2025/26:229, *New Reception Law*) within 72 hours, with each party filing a distinct but mutually reinforcing frame. This establishes the **twin-pillar campaign architecture** (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Things to Know
+### 🎯 Three Things to Know
 
 1. **This is campaign-narrative construction, not coalition rehearsal.** ACH analysis assigns P=0.50 to the campaign-narrative hypothesis vs P=0.35 to coalition-rehearsal. The opposition is locking in timestamped talking points before the summer recess, not preparing to govern.
 
@@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance
+### 📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance
 
 | # | Cluster | DIW | Parties | Watch Out For |
 |:-:|---------|:---:|---------|---------------|
@@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md))
+### 🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md))
 
 | Scenario | Probability | Opposition outcome |
 |----------|:-----------:|--------------------|
@@ -73,7 +72,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely
+### 🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely
 
 | Risk | Why it matters | Update signal |
 |------|----------------|---------------|
@@ -83,7 +82,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 📣 14-Day Watch Window
+### 📣 14-Day Watch Window
 
 | Timing | Signal | What to prepare |
 |--------|--------|-----------------|
@@ -95,7 +94,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)
+### 🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)
 
 | Frame | Backed by | Confidence |
 |-------|-----------|:----------:|
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## ❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)
+### ❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)
 
 - ❌ "Opposition is coalition-ready for post-2026 government" — ACH P=0.35 only; Red-Team critique applies
 - ❌ "Four-party coordination means S+V+MP+C majority is likely after election" — BEAR scenario P=0.10
@@ -117,7 +116,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Deeper Reading
+### 🔗 Deeper Reading
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — Full ACH + Red-Team + cross-cluster interference
 - [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md) — 4-party division of labour
@@ -130,8 +129,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -147,7 +145,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 the Swedish opposition filed **21 motions** concentrated in **four coordinated clusters**. The April 2026 wave is the **most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive** of the 2025/26 riksmöte and establishes the **twin-pillar campaign architecture** (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. Four of the clusters cross filing-time thresholds that constitute *prima facie* evidence of coordination: the reception-law cluster sees **all four major opposition parties** (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions to a single proposition within **72 hours** — historically rare and the headline finding of this dossier. `[HIGH]`
 
@@ -155,7 +153,7 @@ The dominant strategic-logic hypothesis (ACH: P=0.50) is **campaign-narrative co
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 Twenty-one opposition motions filed between April 13–17, 2026 represent the most coordinated parliamentary opposition offensive in the current riksmöte. In an historically rare manoeuvre, all four major opposition parties — **Socialdemokraterna (S)**, **Vänsterpartiet (V)**, **Miljöpartiet (MP)**, and **Centerpartiet (C)** — simultaneously filed counter-motions against the government's flagship immigration legislation package, signalling that immigration policy will be the defining battleground of Sweden's September 2026 election.
 
@@ -165,9 +163,9 @@ The motions target three simultaneous government propositions on immigration (pr
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)
+### 📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)
 
-### Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ **LEAD**
+#### Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ **LEAD**
 
 All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 (New Reception Law) within a 72-hour window. **Dok_ids**: HD024076 (V, Tony Haddou), HD024080 (S, Ida Karkiainen), HD024087 (MP, Annika Hirvonen), HD024089 (C, Niels Paarup-Petersen). The filings are a **deliberate division of labour**: V stakes the principled-left position, S anchors welfare-state protection (anti-privatisation), MP internationalises via EU Pact compatibility, C occupies pragmatist-centrist ground with a phased amendment.
 
@@ -175,7 +173,7 @@ The absence of a joint press conference is strategic: **claimed coordination wou
 
 **See also**: [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)
 
-### Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 **CO-LEAD**
+#### Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 **CO-LEAD**
 
 Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportation — V outright rejection HD024090, C proportionality amendment HD024095, MP partial rejection HD024097) and three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:215 (time-limited housing — V HD024077, S HD024079, MP HD024086). Total immigration motions: **10 of 21 (48%)** — the opposition has made immigration its primary electoral narrative.
 
@@ -183,7 +181,7 @@ Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportati
 
 **See also**: [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md)
 
-### Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉
+#### Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉
 
 S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose the fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. With Sweden's GDP growth at only 0.82% (2024) and 2023 at –0.2%, the government's choice to cut fuel taxes in a supplementary budget creates a credibility gap on climate.
 
@@ -193,7 +191,7 @@ S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose t
 
 **See also**: [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md) · [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md) §3
 
-### Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶
+#### Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶
 
 V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation modernization. V's motion explicitly requests rejection of the entire proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports including follow-up deliveries to human rights violators.
 
@@ -201,7 +199,7 @@ V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject pro
 
 **See also**: [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md) · [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md) §4
 
-### Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)
+#### Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)
 
 Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject prop. 2025/26:216 on medical competence in municipal healthcare. C's opposition is the most striking given its centre-right profile — the party argues the reform reduces municipal flexibility and should be redesigned.
 
@@ -209,7 +207,7 @@ Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject
 
 ---
 
-## ⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique
+### ⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique
 
 > **Counter-hypothesis**: What if the entire cluster has negligible strategic value?
 
@@ -227,7 +225,7 @@ Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject
 
 ---
 
-## 🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis
+### 🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis
 
 When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fiscal, defence, healthcare), rhetorical interference between clusters creates exploitable vectors.
 
@@ -244,7 +242,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses
+### 🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses
 
 | H | Hypothesis | Prior P | Posterior P | Evidence fit |
 |:-:|------------|:-------:|:-----------:|--------------|
@@ -258,9 +256,9 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ Election 2026 Implications
+### ⚡ Election 2026 Implications
 
-### Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)
+#### Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Confidence |
 |-----------|------------|:----------:|
@@ -271,7 +269,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 | Policy Legacy | If government wins 2026, all four propositions become law and define a decade | 🟩 HIGH |
 | Cluster Value to Opposition | Tactical (talking points) ≫ Strategic (coalition rehearsal) | 🟧 MEDIUM (Red-Team adjusted) |
 
-### Analyst Confidence Meter
+#### Analyst Confidence Meter
 
 | Claim | Confidence |
 |-------|:----------:|
@@ -286,7 +284,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 📣 14-Day Watch Window
+### 📣 14-Day Watch Window
 
 | Timing | Trigger | Updates which analysis |
 |--------|---------|------------------------|
@@ -300,7 +298,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### 🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 **Recommended Title (EN)**:
 "Four Opposition Parties Unite Against Sweden's Immigration Package in Unprecedented Parliamentary Challenge"
@@ -319,7 +317,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)
+### 🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)
 
 | File | Status | Tier | Key content |
 |------|--------|:----:|-------------|
@@ -348,8 +346,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27 · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 + DIW v1.0
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -364,7 +361,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted
+### 🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted
 
 | Rank | Dok_id(s) | Topic | Raw | DIW mult. | **DIW score** | Conf. | Electoral | Coalition risk |
 |:----:|-----------|-------|:---:|:---------:|:-------------:|:-----:|:---------:|:--------------:|
@@ -379,7 +376,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0
+### 📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0
 
 Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **how much the legislative axis changes the political-system reality**:
 
@@ -397,9 +394,9 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)
+### 📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)
 
-### 🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89
+#### 🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89
 
 | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----:|----------|
@@ -411,7 +408,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 | **Raw Significance** | **10.0/10** | Mean across dimensions (normalised to 10) |
 | **DIW Score** | **9.40** | Raw × 0.94 (policy-defining axis) |
 
-### 🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97
+#### 🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97
 
 | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----:|----------|
@@ -423,7 +420,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 | **Raw Significance** | **9.0/10** | |
 | **DIW Score** | **8.80** | Raw × 0.98 (electoral-definitional axis) |
 
-### 🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98
+#### 🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98
 
 | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----:|----------|
@@ -437,7 +434,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)
+### 🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)
 
 | Cluster | Base DIW | Lower (-10% salience) | Upper (+10% coordination) | Rank preserved? |
 |---------|:--------:|:----:|:----:|:---------------:|
@@ -451,9 +448,9 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Top Story Decision
+### 🎯 Top Story Decision
 
-### Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)
+#### Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)
 
 **Why this leads**:
 1. **Historical rarity** — 4-party coordination on single proposition within 72 h is unprecedented in current riksmöte
@@ -461,14 +458,14 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 3. **Policy impact** — replaces a 31-year-old reception act with new architecture
 4. **Division-of-labour messaging** — each party occupies distinct rhetorical space, defence-in-depth narrative
 
-### Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)
+#### Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)
 
 **Why this co-leads despite lower raw**:
 1. **Electoral-definitional axis** (DIW ×0.98) — nearly full weight
 2. **S-silence is analytically revealing** — a rare case where **absence** of evidence is primary evidence
 3. **C's statutory proportionality amendment is the most legally-workable opposition motion** in the entire wave
 
-### Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)
+#### Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)
 
 **Why secondary**:
 1. **Climate-fiscal contradiction** provides the opposition's strongest government-credibility attack
@@ -477,7 +474,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### 📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -499,7 +496,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — BLUF builds from LEAD cluster
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md) — scenario priors use DIW-weighted ranks
@@ -513,26 +510,25 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-motions workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-20 13:07 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## Overview
+### Overview
 
 This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026, with special focus on the immigration cluster (10 motions), fuel tax/climate cluster (2 motions), and arms export cluster (2 motions).
 
 ---
 
-## 1. 👥 Citizens
+### 1. 👥 Citizens
 
 **Primary concerns**: Cost of living, housing, employment security, public safety
 **Motion relevance**: HIGH — immigration, fuel costs, healthcare all directly affect citizens
 
-### Key citizen segments affected:
+#### Key citizen segments affected:
 - **Rural Swedes** (fuel tax): Government's fuel tax cut benefits rural citizens who depend on cars. S's opposition (HD024082) risks alienating this group. Approximately 30% of Swedish workforce commutes by car in rural areas.
 - **Welfare-dependent citizens** (reception law): The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) affects S's and MP's core voter base — those who believe in comprehensive public services for asylum seekers.
 - **Crime victims** (HD024078): S's motion demanding a dedicated crime victim law (mot. 2025/26:4078) directly appeals to citizens affected by violent crime, a growing segment of S's electoral concern.
@@ -542,12 +538,12 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)
+### 2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)
 
 **Position**: Will pass all three immigration propositions plus extra budget
 **Motivation**: Tidö agreement mandate + electoral positioning for 2026
 
-### Coalition dynamics:
+#### Coalition dynamics:
 - **Moderaterna (M)**: Supports all three immigration propositions as part of Tidö agreement. Welcomes the opposition's unified rejection — it confirms M's electoral thesis that only the right-of-centre coalition will enforce Sweden's borders.
 - **Sverigedemokraterna (SD)**: Strongly supports stricter deportation (HD024090/95/97 motivate their base by showing "the establishment is defending criminals"). New reception law validates SD's decade-long campaign.
 - **Kristdemokraterna (KD)**: Supports immigration restrictions but has some tension with crime victim law — KD traditionally advocates for restorative justice, and parent liability provisions in prop. 2025/26:222 (HD024078/84/85) are controversial within KD.
@@ -557,11 +553,11 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)
+### 3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)
 
 **Position**: Coordinated challenge on immigration, fiscal, and defense policy
 
-### Party-by-party strategic analysis:
+#### Party-by-party strategic analysis:
 
 **Socialdemokraterna (S)** — 6 motions (HD024079/80/82/84/78/81):
 - Magdalena Andersson's S is pursuing a two-track strategy: (1) accepting some security reform (not opposing deportation outright) while (2) protecting welfare state principles (anti-privatization in HD024080, integration investment in HD024079)
@@ -586,7 +582,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 4. 💼 Business/Industry
+### 4. 💼 Business/Industry
 
 **Sectors affected**:
 - **Transport/Logistics**: Opposes S+MP fuel tax position; benefits from government's fuel tax cut
@@ -600,7 +596,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 5. 🌿 Civil Society
+### 5. 🌿 Civil Society
 
 **Organizations most vocal**:
 - **Röda Korset Sverige**: Opposes prop. 2025/26:229 (new reception law) — supports S, V, MP, C counter-motions
@@ -616,7 +612,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 6. 🌍 International/EU
+### 6. 🌍 International/EU
 
 **EU Commission concerns**:
 - The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) must comply with EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024)
@@ -631,7 +627,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional
+### 7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional
 
 **Constitutional dimensions**:
 - **Proportionality in deportation**: C's HD024095 is legally robust — "systematic repeated offenses over time" aligns with ECHR Article 8. If the government ignores this, administrative courts may strike down individual deportation orders.
@@ -644,7 +640,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion
+### 8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion
 
 **Dominant media narrative** (expected coverage):
 - **SVT Nyheter**: "Fyra partier mot ny mottagandelag" (Four parties against new reception law) — likely to be front-page story
@@ -661,7 +657,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary
+### 📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -698,11 +694,11 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)
+### 🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)
 
 Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the influence-network analysis below. Listing is grouped by role category.
 
-### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)
+#### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)
 
 | # | Actor | Party | Role | Key motion(s) | Confidence |
 |:-:|-------|:-----:|------|---------------|:----------:|
@@ -719,7 +715,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 11 | **Niels Paarup-Petersen** | C | Lead signatory HD024089/95 | Phased amendment + proportionality | 🟩 HIGH |
 | 12 | **Martin Ådahl** | C | Economic-policy spokesperson | HD024088 consumer credit | 🟧 MEDIUM |
 
-### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition
+#### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition
 
 | # | Actor | Party | Role | Key decision point |
 |:-:|-------|:-----:|------|---------------------|
@@ -729,7 +725,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 16 | **Johan Pehrson** | L | Tidö party leader | **🔶 Weak link** — rule-of-law sensitivity on proportionality |
 | 17 | **Maria Malmer Stenergard** | M | Migration minister | Reception-law defence + SfU engagement |
 
-### ⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight
+#### ⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight
 
 | # | Actor | Institution | Role |
 |:-:|-------|-------------|------|
@@ -738,7 +734,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 20 | **Migrationsöverdomstolen** | Migration Court of Appeal | Post-adoption administrative review venue |
 | 21 | **ECtHR (Strasbourg)** | European Court of Human Rights | 3–5 year pilot-judgment potential on deportation |
 
-### 🌿 Civil-society & NGO network
+#### 🌿 Civil-society & NGO network
 
 | # | Actor | Role in this cluster |
 |:-:|-------|----------------------|
@@ -750,7 +746,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 27 | **Diakonia** | Arms-export human-rights advocacy |
 | 28 | **Svenska Freds- och Skiljedomsföreningen** | Arms-export policy critique |
 
-### 💼 Business / industry
+#### 💼 Business / industry
 
 | # | Actor | Sector | Position |
 |:-:|-------|--------|----------|
@@ -759,7 +755,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 31 | **Transportarbetareförbundet** | Labour union | **🔶 Split risk** — may publicly back government fuel-tax cut |
 | 32 | **Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR)** | Municipal association | Concerned about reception-law municipal-capacity burden |
 
-### 📊 Expert / oversight bodies
+#### 📊 Expert / oversight bodies
 
 | # | Actor | Role |
 |:-:|-------|------|
@@ -773,7 +769,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)
+### 🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -858,7 +854,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree
+### 🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree
 
 Where can the opposition coalition fracture, and with what probability?
 
@@ -908,7 +904,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) §Cross-Cluster Interference — influence patterns
 - [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md) §TOWS — stakeholder-informed strategy derivations
@@ -921,8 +917,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -936,7 +931,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses
+### 🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses
 
 Applied to the central question: *What is the strategic logic of the April 14–17 opposition-motion wave?*
 
@@ -952,7 +947,7 @@ Applied to the central question: *What is the strategic logic of the April 14–
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)
+### 🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1010,9 +1005,9 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives
+### 🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives
 
-### 🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)
+#### 🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)
 
 **Setup**: SfU/FiU/UU straight-reject opposition motions in May–June; government retains majority in September; all four propositions become law; opposition runs them as 2026–2030 campaign material but cannot reverse them.
 
@@ -1034,7 +1029,7 @@ flowchart TD
 - Reputational: moderate (climate, possible ECtHR adverse deportation judgment)
 - Electoral: favourable to government until 2030
 
-### 🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)
+#### 🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)
 
 **Setup**: Election produces S-led minority with MP support (±V) but not C; reception-law partial reversal via amendment in Q1 2027. Deportation law retained (S silence locks in). Fuel tax cut reversed. Arms export framework unchanged.
 
@@ -1052,7 +1047,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 **Partial victory for opposition narrative**: reception and fuel tax reversed; deportation and arms retained.
 
-### 🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)
+#### 🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)
 
 **Setup**: Election produces S+V+MP+C 175+ majority; full reversal of reception law, fuel tax, and partial reversal of deportation via statutory proportionality test (HD024095 adopted).
 
@@ -1071,7 +1066,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 **Low-probability but high-impact**: requires simultaneous Tidö collapse and opposition discipline — historically rare.
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)
 
 **Setup**: Election produces no 175+ majority configuration; months of negotiation; eventual minority government with no clear mandate. Motions cluster becomes **negotiation currency** rather than governing programme.
 
@@ -1082,7 +1077,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare
+### 🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare
 
 | Scenario | Opposition should prepare | Government should prepare | Newsroom should prepare |
 |----------|----------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|
@@ -1093,7 +1088,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique
+### 🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique
 
 > **Devil's Advocate**: What if the entire cluster is strategically irrelevant?
 
@@ -1111,7 +1106,7 @@ The Red-Team case against the cluster's political value:
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules
+### 🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules
 
 | Observable signal | Prior shift direction | Magnitude |
 |-------------------|-----------------------|-----------|
@@ -1130,7 +1125,7 @@ The Red-Team case against the cluster's political value:
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies
+### 🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1171,7 +1166,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Basis |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -1185,7 +1180,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - `synthesis-summary.md` — LEAD story selection and findings
 - `executive-brief.md` — 14-day watch window
@@ -1202,8 +1197,7 @@ flowchart LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1219,9 +1213,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks
+### 🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks
 
-### Scoring Methodology
+#### Scoring Methodology
 
 - **Likelihood (L)**: 1 (very unlikely) → 5 (near-certain). Expressed with Bayesian prior P(L≥3).
 - **Impact (I)**: 1 (minimal) → 5 (transformational). Impact magnitude: electoral seats, legislative outcomes, reputational cost.
@@ -1248,9 +1242,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)
+### 🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)
 
-### R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)
+#### R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)
 
 **Narrative**: The government's three-proposition immigration package (prop. 2025/26:229, 235, 215) will pass with M/SD/KD/L majority. The opposition's 10 counter-motions, while democratically essential, will all fail. This creates a **polarisation lock-in**: the government campaigns on "we secured the borders" while opposition campaigns on "we defended human rights" — both narratives are true and irreconcilable. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (World Bank data), voter anxiety about resource competition makes the government's framing electorally stronger.
 
@@ -1263,7 +1257,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 **Opposition strategic response `[HIGH]`**: S's pivot to "integration investment" narrative (HD024079) frames integration as economic productivity, not welfare spending. Combine with comparative-international evidence (private-operator clauses outlier even in Nordic context) to shift frame from "border security" to "welfare-state defence".
 
-### R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)
+#### R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)
 
 **Economic context**: Sweden's unemployment rose from 8.4% (2024) to 8.69% (2025) while GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (after –0.2% in 2023). Economic fragility makes voters more receptive to government arguments about limiting immigration-related public expenditure.
 
@@ -1277,9 +1271,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)
+### 🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)
 
-### R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)
+#### R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)
 
 **Risk**: Post-adoption, prop. 2025/26:229's private-operator clauses face challenge at Migrationsdomstolen on EU Pact Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 grounds; ultimate ECtHR referral possible within 36 months.
 
@@ -1292,7 +1286,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar → L ↑ to 4
 - Government amends to remove private-operator clauses → L ↓ to 1
 
-### R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)
+#### R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)
 
 **Specific risk**: The extra budget cuts fuel taxes, directly benefiting rural households with longer commutes. S's HD024082 opposing the cut may be read in rural constituencies as "S doesn't care about our fuel costs." S lost Norrland ground in 2022.
 
@@ -1308,7 +1302,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - Rural S MPs issue coordinated statement on HD024082 intent → L ↓ to 2
 - Major fuel-price spike (OPEC / geopolitical) during campaign → L ↑ to 5
 
-### R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)
+#### R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)
 
 **Strategic significance**: C's HD024095 on deportation is distinctively moderate — demands proportionality test (systematic repeated offenses). Positions C as potential negotiating partner with government on immigration. If C negotiates, it breaks the four-party opposition front.
 
@@ -1324,7 +1318,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - Paarup-Petersen rejects amendment talks → L ↓ to 2
 - Lagrådet cites proportionality test → L ↑ to 5 (government forced to negotiate)
 
-### R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)
+#### R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)
 
 **Narrative**: S filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235 despite filing on reception (HD024080), housing (HD024079), and fuel tax (HD024082). Signals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party. Reveals that "opposition unity" is selective.
 
@@ -1335,7 +1329,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - S leadership public statement on deportation proportionality → L ↓ to 2
 - S silence extends through election campaign → L ↑ to 4
 
-### R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)
+#### R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)
 
 **Risk**: Lagrådet explicitly critiques private-operator clauses; government forced to amend. High-impact but uncertain-likelihood.
 
@@ -1343,7 +1337,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph
+### 🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1393,7 +1387,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Risk Visualisation
+### 📊 Risk Visualisation
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1424,7 +1418,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)
+### 🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Timeline | Updates risk |
 |-----------|---------|----------|--------------|
@@ -1445,7 +1439,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment
+### 🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment
 
 **Current coalition stability `[HIGH]`**: STABLE (M/SD/KD/L intact)
 - All immigration propositions will pass as planned
@@ -1465,7 +1459,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md) — Bayesian scenario weighting + risk activation per scenario
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — Red-Team critique adjusts R01 consequence magnitude
@@ -1481,8 +1475,7 @@ quadrantChart
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1495,7 +1488,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework
+### 🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework
 
 The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition counter-strategy against the government's spring legislative package. Analysis below covers:
 1. **Cluster-level SWOT** for the LEAD immigration cluster (primary focus)
@@ -1505,9 +1498,9 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)
+### ⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)
 
-### Strengths of Opposition Motions
+#### Strengths of Opposition Motions
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (dok_id) | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|-------------------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1520,7 +1513,7 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 | **S7** | MP's EU Pact compatibility frame (HD024087) gives cluster international-legitimacy authority | HD024087 cites EU Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 material-conditions standard | 🟩 HIGH | MEDIUM | 2026-04-15 |
 | **S8** | Division-of-labour frames cover all major voter segments (left / welfare / international / pragmatist) | Rhetoric-axis analysis across HD024076/80/87/89 | 🟩 HIGH | HIGH | 2026-04-15 |
 
-### Weaknesses of Opposition Motions
+#### Weaknesses of Opposition Motions
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|----------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1532,7 +1525,7 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 | **W6** | No joint press conference or coalition statement; coordination is visible but unclaimed | Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C | 🟧 MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 2026-04-15 |
 | **W7** | V's consistent-rejection pattern across immigration + arms creates "universal rejectionist" frame vulnerability | HD024076 + HD024090 + HD024091 all rejection-structured | 🟩 HIGH | HIGH | 2026-04-16 |
 
-### Opportunities Created by These Motions
+#### Opportunities Created by These Motions
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|----------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1544,7 +1537,7 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 | **O6** | Post-adoption ECtHR litigation on deportation creates multi-year reputational drag on government | Swedish ECHR adverse-judgment track record | 🟧 MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 2026-04-16 |
 | **O7** | MP's end-user review language on arms (HD024096) aligns with Norwegian/Dutch/German practice — standard-setting | Comparative analysis §4 | 🟧 MEDIUM | LOW | 2026-04-16 |
 
-### Threats to Opposition Strategy
+#### Threats to Opposition Strategy
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|----------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1558,11 +1551,11 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation
+### 🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation
 
 The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves. Below: the **≥3-entry interference cells** with strategic impact on the April 2026 opposition campaign.
 
-### SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves
+#### SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1571,7 +1564,7 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 | **SO3** | **S2 (S anti-privatisation) × O2 (climate narrative)** | **Link housing-privatisation to fuel-tax private-benefit** as "government prioritises private interests over public goods" unified frame |
 | **SO4** | **S7 (MP EU Pact compatibility) × O6 (ECtHR litigation)** | **Pre-stage EU Commission remissvar + Strasbourg litigation path**; MP's HD024087 text is usable as precedent for post-adoption legal challenge |
 
-### ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening
+#### ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1579,7 +1572,7 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 | **ST2** | **S1 (4-party coordination) × T1 (government majority passes)** | **Coordinate SfU vote sequencing** — amendment first, then rejection — to prevent "disarray" framing at chamber vote |
 | **ST3** | **S2 (S anti-privatisation) × T2 (rural-voter alienation)** | **Front Norrland-anchored S MPs** (Joakim Järrebring, Fredrik Lundh Sammeli) in media appearances on welfare-state framing |
 
-### WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required
+#### WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1587,7 +1580,7 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 | **WO2** | **W5 (S-silence on deportation) × O3 (S+V+C healthcare coalition)** | **S should use healthcare coalition as broader S+V+C rehearsal template**; deportation-silence fragments the left only if not compensated by other coordination evidence |
 | **WO3** | **W2 (V–C incompatibility) × O5 (L backbench)** | **Stage-manage SfU voting**: C's amendment goes first; if passed, C-V-MP-S-L vote together on amended law; if failed, they unify on rejection. Avoid simultaneous V-reject + C-amend vote |
 
-### WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities
+#### WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1601,43 +1594,43 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix
+### 👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix
 
-### 1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Swedish citizens experience immigration policy directly through social services, housing markets, and labour competition. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (up from 8.4% in 2024), citizens in lower-income brackets are receptive to government arguments about limiting new arrivals. However, **S's HD024080** appeals to citizens concerned about privatisation of asylum services — a proxy for welfare-state protection values that resonate with S's base. The fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) speaks directly to household budgets but risks appearing out-of-touch with rural drivers. A **divided citizenry** is the realistic baseline — the opposition's job is to move ~3-5% swing voters, not to flip majority opinion. `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 The governing coalition views these counter-motions as expected partisan opposition. For **Tidö-agreement** parties, the immigration cluster validates their legislative agenda. The sheer number of counter-motions (10/21 on immigration) **confirms the opposition's strategy** and allows the government to campaign on "defending Sweden's security" against a unified left-green-centre bloc. **L is the weak link**: Johan Pehrson's historical rule-of-law sensitivity and the comparative evidence backing C's HD024095 proportionality test create a narrow fault line. The fuel-tax counter-motions create a secondary vulnerability — the government must justify why a climate-ambivalent tax cut is in Sweden's interest. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 This batch represents the most coordinated opposition filing in the current riksmöte. **Socialdemokraterna (S)** under party leader Magdalena Andersson is pursuing a "responsible opposition" strategy — accepting some security reforms while drawing clear lines on welfare-state privatisation (HD024080) and integration investment (HD024079). The **S-silence on deportation** is strategic, not accidental. **Vänsterpartiet (V)** under Nooshi Dadgostar maintains a principled rejection stance on all immigration tightening but risks the universal-rejectionist framing. **Miljöpartiet (MP)** under Janine Alm Ericson leads on climate issues (HD024098) and humanitarian concerns. **Centerpartiet (C)** occupies the critical swing position — accepting some deportation reform but demanding proportionality (HD024095); C is the most politically interesting actor in this wave because its amendment posture is the bridge between opposition messaging and European mainstream practice. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Swedish industry faces contradictory pressures. The fuel-tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) benefits transport-dependent industries — making S's HD024082 unpopular with business. However, the time-limited housing law (prop. 2025/26:215) addresses industry's need for a stable, integratable workforce — V's HD024077 argues the housing limitation reduces integration success, which over time damages labour supply. Consumer-credit reform (HD024088, C) affects the financial services sector directly. **Defence industry** (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Karlskoga ~8k jobs) opposes V's HD024091 and will quietly lobby committee MPs. **Transport-sector unions** may publicly split from S on HD024082 — a risk S must pre-empt. `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 NGOs, church organisations, and refugee-advocacy groups are the strongest supporters of all opposition immigration motions. **Röda Korset**, **Rädda Barnen**, and **Caritas Sverige** have publicly opposed prop. 2025/26:229. Civil-society concerns centre on: (1) private-sector asylum housing (S's HD024080), (2) proportionality in deportation (C's HD024095 / MP's HD024097), and (3) integration investment (S's HD024079). Crime-victim organisations have mixed views on HD024078/84/85 — parent-liability provisions in the crime-victim law create tension with child-protection principles. **Svenska Freds, Diakonia, Amnesty Sverige** form a durable pro-opposition coalition on arms-export motions. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Sweden's immigration policy reforms must remain compatible with the **EU Pact on Migration and Asylum** (entered force 2024, phased implementation 2025–2027). **MP's HD024087** explicitly argues the new reception law risks non-compliance with Reg. 2024/1348 Article 17 material-conditions standard. The arms-export motions (HD024091/96) create international friction — **Sweden's NATO partners** (UK, Germany, US) expect continued defence-industry cooperation post-NATO accession. **EU DG CLIMA** is monitoring Swedish fuel-tax policy under Fit-for-55 and ETS II (entering 2027). **ECtHR** remains a durable post-adoption challenge venue on deportation (prop. 2025/26:235). `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Legal scholars have flagged proportionality concerns in prop. 2025/26:235. **C's HD024095** reflects this — requiring "systematic repeated offenses over time" for deportation aligns with European Court of Human Rights proportionality doctrine and converges with Germany/Netherlands/Denmark/Switzerland statutory practice. **V's total rejection (HD024090)** goes further, arguing the entire law conflicts with ECHR Article 8 (family life). **Lagrådet yttrande** on prop. 2025/26:229 and 2025/26:235 is the single most consequential pending signal — expected Q2 2026. Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) has not published a formal opinion. Administrative Courts (Migrationsdomstolen) will become the main post-adoption venue. `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 Swedish media (SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD) will cover the coordinated opposition filing as a major political story. Public polling (Novus Q1 2026) shows immigration as the #1 political concern for Swedish voters in 2025–2026. The "four parties against one law" narrative is highly newsworthy. The fuel-tax story plays differently: tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) will frame it as "opposition opposes affordable fuel" — a potential negative story for S. Regional/local media (Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT) will cover the Norrland angle on fuel tax. Young-voter media (TikTok, Instagram) favours MP's climate frame. **Press editorial lines** will be split: DN/SvD lean cautiously pro-government; Aftonbladet/ETC lean pro-opposition; Expressen variable. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart
+### 🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1694,7 +1687,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — LEAD finding + ACH + Red-Team
 - [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md) — LEAD cluster SWOT
@@ -1709,8 +1702,7 @@ flowchart LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1724,7 +1716,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or security threat — it constitutes **healthy democratic opposition exercising accountability functions**. The threat dimensions below are **strategic threats to narrative control** (who wins the 2026 campaign), **governance threats to policy coherence** (climate-fiscal contradiction), and **institutional-integrity threats** (disinformation, coordinated inauthentic behaviour around immigration narratives).
 
@@ -1739,7 +1731,7 @@ The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Threat Taxonomy
+### ⚠️ Threat Taxonomy
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1778,9 +1770,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)
+### 🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)
 
-### T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
+#### T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
 
 The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration propositions simultaneously risks **locking in a binary political cleavage** that dominates 2026 election discourse to the exclusion of other policy areas. When all major opposition parties align on a single policy dimension:
 
@@ -1792,7 +1784,7 @@ The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration prop
 
 **Confidence**: 🟧 MEDIUM — electoral dynamics are inherently uncertain; the threat materialises only if the opposition successfully executes its framing strategy.
 
-### T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]
+#### T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]
 
 Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), yet the government's prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes in a supplementary budget — a move that adds **+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year** (Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling) at a time when Sweden is ~20% behind its 2030 trajectory under Klimatlagen 2017:720. S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) both challenge this with different framings but reach the same conclusion: the fuel-tax cut is bad policy.
 
@@ -1802,7 +1794,7 @@ Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), ye
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩 HIGH — the climate-fiscal contradiction is factual and measurable.
 
-### T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
+#### T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
 
 V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-export ban including follow-up deliveries) signal that a future left-green government would reverse Sweden's post-NATO defence-industrial policy. This creates **policy uncertainty risk** for defence-industry investment decisions. Swedish arms manufacturers (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Systems Karlskoga ~8k jobs) need long-term policy certainty that their export licences will be maintained.
 
@@ -1810,7 +1802,7 @@ V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-e
 
 **Confidence**: 🟧 MEDIUM — V and MP are currently in opposition with no pathway to government without S.
 
-### T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕
+#### T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕
 
 **Context**: Immigration-salience political moments in Sweden 2018, 2022, and now 2026 have correlated with **foreign state-linked amplification networks** (documented by MSB and FOI) and **domestic anonymous influence operations** on social platforms. The April 2026 opposition-motion wave provides a high-value target for:
 
@@ -1835,7 +1827,7 @@ V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-e
 
 ---
 
-## ⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)
+### ⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)
 
 Modelled from **government-perspective**: how might the government/SD dismantle the opposition's four-party narrative?
 
@@ -1901,7 +1893,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)
+### 🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)
 
 Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-communications counter-operation:
 
@@ -1917,7 +1909,7 @@ Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-co
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats
+### 🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats
 
 Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
@@ -1932,7 +1924,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Threat Level Summary
+### 📊 Threat Level Summary
 
 | Threat | Level | Confidence | Timeline | Framework |
 |--------|:-----:|:----------:|----------|-----------|
@@ -1947,7 +1939,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions
+### 🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions
 
 | # | Action | Priority | Addressed-to |
 |:-:|--------|:--------:|--------------|
@@ -1962,7 +1954,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — Red-Team + ACH ties directly to T1
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md) — R10 (V rejectionist) ↔ T1/A1/C1
@@ -1978,8 +1970,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### arms\-export\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1995,7 +1986,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"
+### 1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"
 
 Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024, ending 200+ years of formal military non-alignment (*alliansfriheten*). Prop. 2025/26:228 modernises the arms-export legal framework (*lag om krigsmateriel* + *lag om vissa produkter som kan användas för dödsstraff eller tortyr*) to align Swedish defence-industrial practice with its new alliance obligations and the post-Ukraine-invasion European armaments market reality.
 
@@ -2011,7 +2002,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence
+### 2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Position | Electoral message |
 |--------|-------|----------------|----------|-------------------|
@@ -2022,7 +2013,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix
+### 3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix
 
 | Dimension | Pre-2024 (non-aligned) | Post-2024 (NATO) | Effect on cluster |
 |-----------|-------------------------|--------------------|-------------------|
@@ -2036,7 +2027,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Cluster SWOT
+### 4. Cluster SWOT
 
 | Dimension | Evidence | Confidence |
 |-----------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -2056,7 +2047,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem
+### 5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2070,7 +2061,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies
+### 6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies
 
 | Jurisdiction | End-user control regime | Human-rights criteria application | Swedish position (post-prop. 2025/26:228) |
 |--------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
@@ -2087,7 +2078,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Risk Matrix
+### 7. Risk Matrix
 
 | R# | Risk | L | I | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:-:|:-:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2100,7 +2091,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Forward Indicators
+### 8. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal | Timeline | Risk |
 |-----------|--------|----------|------|
@@ -2112,7 +2103,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Stakeholder Map
+### 9. Stakeholder Map
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -2173,7 +2164,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Claim | Confidence | Basis |
 |-------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -2185,7 +2176,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 11. Cross-References
+### 11. Cross-References
 
 - **Synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 5 (defence-policy signalling)
 - **Threat analysis**: [`../threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md) T3 (arms export opposition)
@@ -2203,8 +2194,7 @@ graph TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ### deportation\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2221,7 +2211,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics
+### 1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics
 
 Proposition 2025/26:235 expands the grounds on which non-citizens can be deported following a criminal conviction. It lowers the severity threshold, extends to categories of offence previously requiring repeat conviction, and shortens the procedural window for appeal. The government presents it as a **flagship gäng-kriminalitet response** — a direct continuation of the 2023–2025 organised-crime legislative arc.
 
@@ -2237,7 +2227,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation
+### 2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Legal position | ECHR alignment | Post-adoption litigation value |
 |--------|-------|----------------|----------------|:--:|--------------------------------|
@@ -2249,7 +2239,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)
+### 3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)
 
 | Dimension | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence |
 |-----------|-------------------|:----------:|
@@ -2269,7 +2259,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem
+### 4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2283,7 +2273,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis
+### 5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis
 
 The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article 8 (family life) because deportation for criminal conduct has been repeatedly upheld by the European Court of Human Rights when:
 
@@ -2307,7 +2297,7 @@ The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
+### 6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
 
 | R# | Risk | L | I | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:-:|:-:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2320,7 +2310,7 @@ The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Forward Indicators
+### 7. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal | Timeline | Risk |
 |-----------|--------|----------|------|
@@ -2332,7 +2322,7 @@ The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"
+### 8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2392,7 +2382,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)
+### 9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)
 
 | Uncertainty | Current prior | What would update |
 |-------------|--------------:|-------------------|
@@ -2404,7 +2394,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Cross-References
+### 10. Cross-References
 
 - **Synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 2 (triple-pressure immigration)
 - **Related reception cluster**: [`./reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)
@@ -2424,8 +2414,7 @@ graph LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ### fuel\-tax\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2441,7 +2430,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/ri
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important
+### 1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important
 
 The extra budget (*extra ändringsbudget*) is a mid-cycle supplementary fiscal instrument. Reducing fuel tax via an extra budget is unusual: extra budgets are traditionally reserved for crisis response (pandemic, war, natural disaster). Using one to cut fuel tax signals that the government either (a) believes current fuel prices are a **genuine household-budget crisis** or (b) is delivering an **election-adjacent pocketbook signal** to rural voters within the legal envelope of extra-budget practice.
 
@@ -2456,7 +2445,7 @@ These two frames are **substitutable, not competitive**: a reader who rejects th
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division
+### 2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Primary frame | Secondary frame | Target voter segment |
 |--------|-------|----------------|---------------|-----------------|---------------------|
@@ -2467,7 +2456,7 @@ These two frames are **substitutable, not competitive**: a reader who rejects th
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Cluster SWOT
+### 3. Cluster SWOT
 
 | Dimension | Evidence | Confidence |
 |-----------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -2487,7 +2476,7 @@ These two frames are **substitutable, not competitive**: a reader who rejects th
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification
+### 4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification
 
 Sweden's Climate Act (*Klimatlagen 2017:720*) obligates the government to pursue policies consistent with the long-term goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 and interim targets:
 
@@ -2503,7 +2492,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 5. TOWS Interference
+### 5. TOWS Interference
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2517,7 +2506,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax
+### 6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax
 
 | Jurisdiction | Recent fuel-tax policy (2022–2026) | Climate trajectory | Lesson |
 |--------------|------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
@@ -2533,7 +2522,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
+### 7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
 
 | R# | Risk | L | I | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:-:|:-:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2545,7 +2534,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Forward Indicators
+### 8. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal | Timeline | Risk |
 |-----------|--------|----------|------|
@@ -2558,7 +2547,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)
+### 9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2619,7 +2608,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Claim | Confidence | Basis |
 |-------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -2631,7 +2620,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 11. Cross-References
+### 11. Cross-References
 
 - **Synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 3
 - **Risk assessment**: [`../risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md) R03
@@ -2649,8 +2638,7 @@ graph LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ### reception\-law\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2667,7 +2655,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story
+### 1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story
 
 Sweden has not seen **all four major opposition parties** (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions against a single government proposition in a 72-hour window at any point in the current riksmöte. The last comparable four-party convergence on an immigration bill was the 2022 "Migration Package" debates — and even then, motions were staggered across a week and coordinated informally. The April 2026 reception-law cluster is **tighter, more public, and more electorally framed** than that precedent.
 
@@ -2685,7 +2673,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour
+### 2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Committee | Rhetorical frame | Core demand |
 |--------|-------|----------------|-----------|------------------|-------------|
@@ -2698,7 +2686,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)
+### 3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)
 
 | Dimension | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence |
 |-----------|-------------------|:----------:|
@@ -2719,7 +2707,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity
+### 4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2733,7 +2721,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)
+### 5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)
 
 Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but the **combination** of private-sector operation + time-limited benefits + activation duties is on the restrictive end of EU practice.
 
@@ -2750,7 +2738,7 @@ Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)
+### 6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)
 
 | R# | Risk | L (1-5) | I (1-5) | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2762,7 +2750,7 @@ Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Forward Indicators
+### 7. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal to watch | Timeline | Updates which risk |
 |-----------|----------------|----------|--------------------|
@@ -2775,7 +2763,7 @@ Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)
+### 8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -2838,7 +2826,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 9. Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Claim | Confidence | Basis |
 |-------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -2851,7 +2839,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Cross-References
+### 10. Cross-References
 
 - **Cluster-level synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 1
 - **Cross-reference map**: [`../cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md) §Cross-Party Alignment
@@ -2869,8 +2857,7 @@ flowchart LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2883,7 +2870,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer
+### 1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer
 
 SWOT, scenario, and risk artifacts answer *what* and *why*. They do not answer the operational question every editor, civil servant, and foreign desk needs: **which governments are and are not possible after September 2026, and how does the April wave change those numbers?**
 
@@ -2896,7 +2883,7 @@ This artifact provides:
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)
+### 2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)
 
 | Party | 2022 seats | Bloc |
 |-------|:----------:|------|
@@ -2910,9 +2897,9 @@ This artifact provides:
 | **L** — Liberalerna | 16 | Government |
 | **Total** | **349** | |
 
-### Majority threshold: **175 seats**
+#### Majority threshold: **175 seats**
 
-### Current bloc sums
+#### Current bloc sums
 
 | Bloc | Seats | Status |
 |------|:-----:|--------|
@@ -2924,7 +2911,7 @@ This artifact provides:
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)
+### 3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)
 
 Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wave polling effect):
 
@@ -2941,7 +2928,7 @@ Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wa
 
 > **4-percent threshold warning `[HIGH]`**: L at 4.3 % is **within the ±1.5 pp Novus sampling band** of the 4.0 % Riksdag threshold. A single bad polling month pushes L below; if L misses the threshold its seats redistribute (≈ 15 of the 16 flow to M/KD/SD under Sainte-Laguë). This is the **single largest single-party uncertainty** in the 2026 election.
 
-### Pre-wave bloc projection
+#### Pre-wave bloc projection
 
 | Bloc | Projected seats (L in) | Projected seats (L out) |
 |------|:----------------------:|:-----------------------:|
@@ -2953,7 +2940,7 @@ Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wa
 
 ---
 
-## 4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied
+### 4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied
 
 From `historical-baseline.md` §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-year waves is a **−1.3 pp median shift against the government** in the three weeks following a ≥ 10-motion coordinated opposition wave. Applying that prior to the April 2026 polling baseline:
 
@@ -2969,9 +2956,9 @@ From `historical-baseline.md` §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix
+### 5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix
 
-### Notation
+#### Notation
 - ✅ = mathematically possible (≥ 175 seats) AND politically plausible (no ruled-out blocks)
 - 🟧 = mathematically possible but requires political compromises with declared ruled-out actors
 - ❌ = mathematically impossible under April 2026 polling (< 175 seats) OR politically foreclosed
@@ -2986,13 +2973,13 @@ From `historical-baseline.md` §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-
 | 6 | **Tidö + L replaced by C** (M + KD + C + SD) | 62 + 17 + 26 + 65 = **170** | ❌ (5 short) | C has ruled out SD cooperation; would implode C |
 | 7 | **"Grand coalition" S + M** | 119 + 62 = **181** | 🟧 | No mainstream support in either party; historically unprecedented in Sweden |
 
-### Key implication
+#### Key implication
 
 > **Most probable post-2026 government `[HIGH]`**: **Scenario #2 (S + V + MP + C)** is the **only mathematically viable AND politically plausible** configuration under current polling. The April 2026 opposition wave has a specific effect: it **demonstrates operational capacity for exactly this configuration** ahead of post-election negotiations. Whether intentional or not, the wave functions as **coalition-capability signalling** to C's own voters and party apparatus.
 
 ---
 
-## 6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point
+### 6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point
 
 Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government with V — a boundary C has historically policed strongly. The April wave provides **three data points on C's posture**:
 
@@ -3004,7 +2991,7 @@ Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government
 
 > **Interpretation `[HIGH]`**: C's filing pattern is **consistent with conditional post-election cooperation, not fusion**. It signals "we can govern with them on issue-by-issue basis" not "we are a bloc with them". This is exactly the **tolerated minority-government** arithmetic that has characterised Swedish politics since 2014 (Löfven I S-MP with V tolerance; Löfven II S-MP-C-L decemberöverenskommelse; Andersson S minority with V tolerance).
 
-### Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)
+#### Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)
 
 - **Cabinet**: S + MP (two-party cabinet, ~138 seats represented)
 - **Budget confidence**: V + C tolerate with **policy-specific red lines** (V on welfare spending, C on fiscal discipline)
@@ -3014,7 +3001,7 @@ Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026
+### 7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026
 
 Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining five months to the election:
 
@@ -3031,7 +3018,7 @@ Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis
+### 8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis
 
 | Invalidating event | Effect | Re-run trigger |
 |--------------------|--------|----------------|
@@ -3044,7 +3031,7 @@ Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims
+### 9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims
 
 1. **[HIGH]** The Tidö government has already lost its projected majority under April 2026 polling — **before** the wave polling effect is applied.
 2. **[HIGH]** Scenario #2 (S+V+MP+C cooperation) is the only viable post-election government configuration and the April wave is consistent with capability-signalling for it.
@@ -3055,8 +3042,7 @@ Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining
 **Classification**: Public · **Reviewer note**: seat projections use Sainte-Laguë allocation with 4 % threshold; the Novus April mid-month average is the baseline. Update this file when the May 20, 2026 polls are published. The `historical-baseline.md` polling-delta priors feed directly into §4 here.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3070,11 +3056,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties
+### 🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:229 (*En ny mottagandelag*) combines centralised Migrationsverket-run facilities, private-sector operation, time-limited benefits, and activation duties. Four opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024076/80/87/89). S's HD024080 specifically attacks **private-sector operation**. Where does this place Sweden?
 
-### 1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator
+#### 1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator
 
 | Jurisdiction | Reception architecture | Private operation | Time-limiting | Activation duties | RSF 2025 rank | Asylum-grant rate (2024) |
 |--------------|------------------------|:-----------------:|:-------------:|:-----------------:|:-------------:|:------------------------:|
@@ -3089,7 +3075,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 > **Comparative insight `[HIGH]`**: The **private-operation provision** is the **distinctive Swedish outlier** relative to Nordic peers. Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Netherlands all operate state-centred reception without private sub-contracting of housing. Germany permits private operation **under Länder-level oversight** — this is the closest parallel, but it exists because of German federalism, not by design. Austria briefly experimented with BBU-GmbH (state-owned limited company) and private sub-contracting; the experiment generated repeated public scandals over housing conditions (2018–2021) and Austria has since rolled back private contracts. **S's HD024080 anti-privatisation frame is therefore aligned with comparative best practice, not ideological outlier**.
 
-### 1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility
+#### 1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility
 
 The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Conditions) sets **minimum standards** for reception, including:
 
@@ -3102,11 +3088,11 @@ The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Condit
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality
+### 🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:235 expands deportation triggers for non-citizens convicted of crimes. Three opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024090/95/97). C's HD024095 demands **statutory proportionality testing** ("systematic repeated offences over time"). Does this align with European practice?
 
-### 2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator
+#### 2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator
 
 | Jurisdiction | Proportionality test | Statutory or administrative? | ECHR Art. 8 case-law posture | ECtHR adverse judgments (2015–2025) |
 |--------------|---------------------|:---:|------------------------------|:---:|
@@ -3122,7 +3108,7 @@ The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Condit
 
 > **Comparative insight `[HIGH]`**: The **statutory proportionality test is the modal European approach**. Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, UK, and Belgium all codify deportation-proportionality criteria in legislation, not administrative guidance. **C's HD024095 therefore converges with the European statutory mainstream** — framing it as a leftist or liberal outlier would be factually incorrect. It is a rule-of-law convergence proposal.
 
-### 2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation
+#### 2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation
 
 Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower adverse ECtHR judgment counts** (mean 1.67) than administrative-test jurisdictions (Sweden, Norway: mean 3.5). The correlation is not perfectly causal — ECtHR caseload also depends on litigation capacity — but **statutory specificity does correlate with fewer successful Strasbourg challenges**, which is in the government's own interest.
 
@@ -3130,11 +3116,11 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories
+### 🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes via an *extra ändringsbudget*. S (HD024082) attacks fiscal framing; MP (HD024098) attacks climate coherence. How does this compare to peer climate-committed democracies 2022–2026?
 
-### 3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy
+#### 3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy
 
 | Jurisdiction | 2022–2026 fuel-tax policy | Climate trajectory (per national climate-law) | Electoral outcome of cut |
 |--------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
@@ -3148,7 +3134,7 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 > **Comparative insight `[HIGH]`**: Of six peer jurisdictions, **only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt)** is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut. Germany **did not extend it**, and the measure is now cited in German policy discourse as an unproductive use of fiscal space that did not buy political goodwill. The Swedish government is therefore **betting against European comparative experience**.
 
-### 3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators
+#### 3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators
 
 | Jurisdiction | Climate-law mechanism | Parliamentary oversight | Judicial review potential |
 |--------------|-----------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|
@@ -3162,11 +3148,11 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls
+### 🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:228 modernises Sweden's arms-export framework post-NATO accession. V (HD024091) rejects totally; MP (HD024096) demands end-user review. Where does this place Sweden?
 
-### 4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator
+#### 4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator
 
 | Jurisdiction | End-user control regime | Criterion-2 (HR) application | Post-delivery monitoring | Public disclosure |
 |--------------|--------------------------|------------------------------|:------------------------:|------------------:|
@@ -3186,7 +3172,7 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions
+### 🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -3214,7 +3200,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom
+### 🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom
 
 | Finding | Reportable statement | Confidence |
 |---------|---------------------|:----------:|
@@ -3226,7 +3212,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes
+### 🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes
 
 1. **Most-similar design** applied for Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI) — small open-economy parliamentary democracies with welfare states.
 2. **Most-different design** applied for UK, France, Germany — testing whether policy effects replicate across structurally different systems.
@@ -3238,7 +3224,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - `reception-law-cluster-analysis.md` §5 (cluster-specific comparison)
 - `deportation-cluster-analysis.md` §5 (ECHR alignment)
@@ -3252,15 +3238,14 @@ quadrantChart
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-motions workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-20 13:02 UTC | **Data Depth**: SUMMARY (MCP get_motioner)
 
 ---
 
-## 🗂️ Document Classification Overview
+### 🗂️ Document Classification Overview
 
 | # | Dok_id | Motion Nr | Title (EN) | Party | Committee | Domain | Sensitivity | Urgency |
 |---|--------|-----------|------------|-------|-----------|--------|-------------|---------|
@@ -3288,7 +3273,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Classification by Policy Domain
+### 📊 Classification by Policy Domain
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
@@ -3302,7 +3287,7 @@ pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Committee Distribution
+### 🎯 Committee Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -3323,7 +3308,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix
+### 🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix
 
 | Party | SfU | AU | CU | SoU | FiU | UU | Total |
 |-------|-----|----|----|-----|-----|----|-------|
@@ -3335,32 +3320,31 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📌 Key Classification Findings
+### 📌 Key Classification Findings
 
-### 1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
+#### 1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
 All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed motions on **three simultaneous immigration-related propositions** — a coordinated response not seen since the 2022 Migration Package debates. This signals a deliberate opposition strategy to frame immigration as the central political battleground before the September 2026 election.
 
-### 2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
+#### 2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
 Both S (center-left) and MP (Green) oppose the government's fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. This unusual alignment of economic-left and climate-green parties creates a unified messaging opportunity: the government is both economically irresponsible (S) and climate-damaging (MP).
 
-### 3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
+#### 3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
 V and MP both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation, continuing a consistent pattern of opposing Sweden's post-2022 defense-industrial pivot. With NATO membership now settled, this opposition has limited practical effect but strong electoral signaling value for their core voters.
 
-### 4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
+#### 4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
 The unusual alignment of S, V, and C against prop. 2025/26:216 (municipal healthcare medical competence) reflects a substantive policy disagreement about regulatory design, not just partisan positioning.
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-motions workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-20 13:08 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network
+### 🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network
 
-### Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference
+#### Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference
 
 | Proposition | Title | Counter-Motions | Filing Parties | Committee |
 |-------------|-------|-----------------|----------------|-----------|
@@ -3377,7 +3361,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network
+### 🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -3414,9 +3398,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Party Coordination Analysis
+### 📊 Party Coordination Analysis
 
-### Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)
+#### Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -3448,9 +3432,9 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Previous Period Cross-References
+### 🔗 Previous Period Cross-References
 
-### Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)
+#### Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)
 
 The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previous run:
 
@@ -3460,7 +3444,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 | HD024097 (MP, deportation) | HD024090 (V, deportation) | Parallel rejection strategies |
 | HD024093 (C, cybersecurity) | HD024095 (C, deportation) | C's consistent "more analysis needed" framing |
 
-### Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte
+#### Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte
 
 - The immigration motions continue opposition strategy from 2024/25 riksmöte when similar restrictions were resisted
 - V's complete rejection pattern (HD024090, HD024091) mirrors V's consistent "no" to all security-related legislation since 2022
@@ -3468,7 +3452,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context
+### 📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context
 
 | Motion Cluster | Economic Context Link | Data Point |
 |---------------|----------------------|------------|
@@ -3479,7 +3463,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections
+### 🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections
 
 1. **SfU Hearings** (May 2026): All immigration motions will be heard in Social Affairs Committee — expect testimony from Röda Korset, UNHCR Sweden
 2. **FiU Budget Vote** (May 2026): Fuel tax extra budget — HD024082/98 will be voted down but provide campaign material
@@ -3487,8 +3471,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 4. **CIA Platform connection**: Voting records for these motions will appear at https://hack23.github.io/cia/ when chamber votes occur (June 2026)
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3500,7 +3483,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Rule Compliance Matrix
+### 1. Rule Compliance Matrix
 
 Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 
@@ -3521,7 +3504,7 @@ Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File
+### 2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File
 
 | File | Tier | Rationale |
 |------|:----:|-----------|
@@ -3544,9 +3527,9 @@ Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)
+### 3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)
 
-### Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)
+#### Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)
 - Baseline artifacts (classification, significance, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder, cross-ref, synthesis)
 - Single-frame analysis on each cluster
 - No comparative or scenario-tree content
@@ -3554,15 +3537,14 @@ Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 - Synthesis at ~100 lines; SWOT at ~126 lines; risk at ~109 lines
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-motions workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-20 13:09 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## 📦 Data Sources Used
+### 📦 Data Sources Used
 
 | Source | MCP Tool | Documents Fetched | Date Range | Quality |
 |--------|----------|-------------------|------------|---------|
@@ -3573,9 +3555,9 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📋 Documents Selected for Analysis
+### 📋 Documents Selected for Analysis
 
-### Primary Analysis Set (April 14–17, 2026 — not in previous run)
+#### Primary Analysis Set (April 14–17, 2026 — not in previous run)
 
 **Immigration Cluster — New Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229)**:
 - HD024080: mot. 2025/26:4080 — Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) — 2026-04-15
@@ -3616,7 +3598,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Data Quality Notes
+### 📊 Data Quality Notes
 
 - **Full text**: Not available (text field returned null in all get_dokument_innehall calls); snippets available confirm document metadata
 - **Summary quality**: Good — summaries include party, leading signatory, committee referral, and key policy decisions
@@ -3625,19 +3607,19 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## ✅ Analysis Artifacts Generated (Reference-Exemplar File Set)
+### ✅ Analysis Artifacts Generated (Reference-Exemplar File Set)
 
-### Top-level synthesis & navigation
+#### Top-level synthesis & navigation
 - [x] `README.md` — folder index, DIW-ranked reading order
 - [x] `executive-brief.md` — 1-page decision-maker BLUF + 14-day watch window
 - [x] `synthesis-summary.md` — master synthesis (BLUF, ACH, Red-Team, cross-cluster interference, analyst-confidence meter)
 
-### Specialist-audience artifacts
+#### Specialist-audience artifacts
 - [x] `scenario-analysis.md` — ACH 3 hypotheses + 4-scenario tree + Bayesian priors + Red-Team critique
 - [x] `comparative-international.md` — 4 policy axes × 8+ peer jurisdictions (Nordic + DE/NL/FR + RSF/V-Dem + EU law)
 - [x] `methodology-reflection.md` — reference-exemplar self-audit + Rule 1–10 compliance matrix
 
-### Analytic pillars (all L2 or better)
+#### Analytic pillars (all L2 or better)
 - [x] `classification-results.md` — 21 motions taxonomy + L-tier assignment
 - [x] `significance-scoring.md` — Raw + DIW-weighted scoring + sensitivity analysis
 - [x] `swot-analysis.md` — 4-cluster SWOT + **TOWS interference matrix** (4 critical WT vulnerabilities)
@@ -3646,18 +3628,17 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - [x] `stakeholder-perspectives.md` — 8 groups + 37-actor registry + influence network + fracture-probability tree
 - [x] `cross-reference-map.md` — proposition → motion matrix + party coordination network
 
-### Cluster-level deep dives (per-document L2+)
+#### Cluster-level deep dives (per-document L2+)
 - [x] `documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md` — LEAD 4-party cluster L2+
 - [x] `documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md` — co-LEAD 3-party triangulation L2+
 - [x] `documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md` — climate-fiscal cluster L2
 - [x] `documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md` — post-NATO cluster L2
 
-### Data
+#### Data
 - [x] `economic-data.json` — World Bank Sweden macroeconomic context
 
 ## Historical Baseline
-
-_Source: [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-baseline.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3670,7 +3651,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters
+### 1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters
 
 Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and hard to falsify without a baseline. This artifact answers three calibration questions that every other artifact in this dossier depends on:
 
@@ -3680,7 +3661,7 @@ Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and har
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026
+### 2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026
 
 The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where **≥ 3 opposition parties filed ≥ 10 counter-motions against government propositions within a ≤ 14-day window on a common policy cluster**. Inclusion criteria are deliberately strict so that the 2026 event is judged against its real peers, not noise.
 
@@ -3697,7 +3678,7 @@ The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where **≥ 3 opposition p
 | 9 | 2024-10 | Migration — return-centres bill | S, V, MP, C | 18 | Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support) | ❌ |
 | 🔶 10 | **2026-04** | **Reception + Deportation + Housing + Fuel Tax + Arms + Consumer + Healthcare** | **S, V, MP, C** | **21** | **Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)** | **✅ Sept. 2026** |
 
-### Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim
+#### Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim
 
 Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period framing:
 
@@ -3712,7 +3693,7 @@ Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period fra
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves
+### 3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves
 
 Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates discipline this. For each comparable election-year wave (rows 1, 4, 7) the table below records the wave's quantitative features and the electoral outcome six months later.
 
@@ -3723,7 +3704,7 @@ Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates disc
 | 2022-03 | 11 | V+MP+C | −1.1 pp | +1.7 pp | ✅ |
 | **2026 median prior** | **≈ 10–11** | **≥3** | **−1.3 pp (median)** | **+1.2 pp (median)** | **3 / 3 = 100 % — but n = 3** |
 
-### Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling
+#### Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling
 
 The 2026 wave is **larger** (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two reasonable priors follow:
 
@@ -3734,7 +3715,7 @@ The 2026 wave is **larger** (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave
+### 4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave
 
 Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the **most similar** prior event (same four parties, same government, same migration theme, same parliamentary term), it is the strongest comparator. The deltas below isolate what is genuinely new in 2026.
 
@@ -3753,9 +3734,9 @@ Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the **most similar** prior event
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says
+### 5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says
 
-### 5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)
+#### 5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -3767,7 +3748,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 > **Trend observation `[HIGH]`**: Opposition filing volume has risen ~90% from 2014/15 to 2024/25, with the sharpest acceleration from 2022/23 onward (under the current government). The 2025/26 YTD count of 238 (≈ 60% of the riksmöte elapsed) projects to **≈ 397 by end-of-term if the pace holds** — which would be a new record.
 
-### 5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)
+#### 5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)
 
 Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same proposition within ≤ 48 hours** of each other:
 
@@ -3783,7 +3764,7 @@ Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same
 
 ---
 
-## 6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims
+### 6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims
 
 | Dossier claim | Baseline verdict | Suggested edit |
 |---------------|:----------------:|----------------|
@@ -3797,7 +3778,7 @@ Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Data-Quality Notes
+### 7. Data-Quality Notes
 
 - **Coverage**: Riksdagen Öppna Data filing index is complete back to the 2002/03 riksmöte. The 2014–2026 window is chosen because the current five-party bloc structure stabilised post-2014.
 - **Edge cases**: Rows 2 (2015-11) and 6 (2021-06) involve parties in atypical positions (MP partially opposing own government; V at break point with Löfven II). Treated as opposition-side filings.
@@ -3807,3 +3788,27 @@ Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same
 ---
 
 **Classification**: Public · **Confidence on headline baseline claims**: 🟩 HIGH · **Reviewer**: please flag any inter-period comparability concerns (committee reorganisations, rule changes) for the next revision.
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md)
+- [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/article.md
index 1e62dfcbfc..9548fb49c7 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-21
 subfolder: committeeReports
 slug: 2026-04-21-committeeReports
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.882Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.681Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -36,13 +35,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a **14-report package** that operationalises a **three-pillar electoral bet**: fiscal relief (FiU48, 4.1B SEK fuel and energy subsidies), enforcement credibility (SfU22 migration inhibition), and constitutional legacy (KU32/KU33 *vilande* grundlagsändringar that bind the next Riksdag). The **headline finding** is that this is the **first time since the 2014 decemberöverenskommelse** that a sitting government has coordinated pre-election fiscal, enforcement, and constitutional measures within a single committee week. FiU48 and SfU22 both score **22/25** on the significance matrix; their joint adoption defines the spring 2026 inflection point. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Things to Know
+### 🎯 Three Things to Know
 
 1. **FiU48 is simultaneously an election relief measure AND an EU compliance correction.** Cutting petrol tax by 82 öre/liter and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ brings Sweden to the **EU Energy Tax Directive 2003/96/EC floor** — the lowest rate permitted by Brussels. The 4.1B SEK cost is absorbed as a supplementary budget and expires 30 September 2026 — **14 days after the election**. If the government is re-elected it will face pressure to extend; if the opposition wins it inherits a sunset clause that is politically costly to let lapse.
 
@@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a **14-report package** that oper
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Top Five Reports, Ranked by Significance
+### 📊 Top Five Reports, Ranked by Significance
 
 | # | Dok_id | Report | Score | Committee | Watch Out For |
 |:-:|--------|--------|:-----:|-----------|---------------|
@@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ See [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md))
+### 🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md))
 
 | Scenario | Probability | Political outcome |
 |----------|:-----------:|-------------------|
@@ -80,7 +79,7 @@ See [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Closely
+### 🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Closely
 
 | Risk | L×I | Why it matters | Update signal |
 |------|:---:|----------------|---------------|
@@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ See [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/a
 
 ---
 
-## 📣 14-Day Watch Window
+### 📣 14-Day Watch Window
 
 | Timing | Signal | What to prepare |
 |--------|--------|-----------------|
@@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ See [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/a
 
 ---
 
-## 🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)
+### 🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)
 
 | Frame | Backed by | Confidence |
 |-------|-----------|:----------:|
@@ -120,7 +119,7 @@ See [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/a
 
 ---
 
-## ❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak or Oversimplified)
+### ❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak or Oversimplified)
 
 - ❌ "FiU48 is a permanent tax cut" — sunset clause 30 Sept 2026; structural continuation requires separate legislation
 - ❌ "SfU22 deports more people" — it creates a no-status residual cohort, not new removal capacity
@@ -130,7 +129,7 @@ See [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/a
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Deeper Reading
+### 🔗 Deeper Reading
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md) — Cross-document synthesis + mermaid map
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md) — 5-dimension matrix across 15 documents
@@ -152,8 +151,7 @@ See [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/a
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-28
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21  
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26  
@@ -164,7 +162,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Top Story
+### 🎯 Top Story
 
 **Government Fires Election-Year Populist Salvo: Fuel Tax Cut and Energy Price Relief**
 
@@ -176,7 +174,7 @@ SfU22 — introducing "inhibition" (uppskjuten verkställighet) to replace tempo
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Document Rankings by Significance
+### 📊 Document Rankings by Significance
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title | Significance | Domain |
 |------|--------|-------|-------------|--------|
@@ -197,7 +195,7 @@ SfU22 — introducing "inhibition" (uppskjuten verkställighet) to replace tempo
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Committee Activity Overview
+### 🏛️ Committee Activity Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -228,29 +226,29 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 🔑 Key Themes This Cycle
+### 🔑 Key Themes This Cycle
 
-### 1. 🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Relief (HD01FiU48) — TOP STORY
+#### 1. 🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Relief (HD01FiU48) — TOP STORY
 The supplementary budget is the government's most significant economic intervention since the 2022 energy crisis support packages. Fuel tax reduction to EU minimum levels (petrol: 82 öre/liter cut; diesel: 319 SEK/m³ cut) across May-September 2026 will benefit every Swedish driver — approximately 5.7 million licensed drivers and 4.8 million registered vehicles. The el- och gasprisstöd (electricity and gas price support) reimburses January-February 2026 heating costs. Total cost: 4.1 billion SEK. The government's justification — Middle East conflict and high winter heating bills — is technically accurate but politically transparent: this is relief timed to coincide with the final campaign buildup period before September 14, 2026.
 
-### 2. 🔴 Migration Enforcement Tightening (HD01SfU22)
+#### 2. 🔴 Migration Enforcement Tightening (HD01SfU22)
 The inhibition reform closes the temporary-permit pathway while extending deportation enforcement machinery. This is the government's most direct operationalization of its Tidöavtal migration commitments. Risk: ECHR exposure; Opportunity: electoral reward from enforcement-focused voters.
 
-### 3. 🟣 Dual Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU32, HD01KU33)
+#### 3. 🟣 Dual Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU32, HD01KU33)
 Two constitution-level changes adopted as "vilande" (pending) requiring re-affirmation after the September 2026 election. KU32 expands accessibility requirements applicable to press-freedom-protected media; KU33 restricts public access to digitally seized materials in criminal investigations. Both require the post-election Riksdag to pass identical wording — binding the next government to these changes regardless of who wins.
 
-### 4. 🔵 Digital Infrastructure Modernization (HD01TU21)
+#### 4. 🔵 Digital Infrastructure Modernization (HD01TU21)
 The state e-ID proposal moves Sweden toward eIDAS2 compliance and challenges BankID's near-monopoly. Cross-party support likely; implementation timeline 2027-2028. Digital equity benefit for 15-20% of Swedes lacking BankID access.
 
-### 5. 🟢 Agricultural & Climate Accountability (HD01MJU19, MJU20, MJU21)
+#### 5. 🟢 Agricultural & Climate Accountability (HD01MJU19, MJU20, MJU21)
 Three MJU-related reports this cycle: waste legislation reform (circular economy), Riksrevisionen audit of climate policy framework effectiveness, and agricultural emissions audit. Together these constitute the most comprehensive environmental accountability package of the 2025/26 session.
 
-### 6. 🏠 Housing & Property Market Reforms (HD01CU27, CU28)
+#### 6. 🏠 Housing & Property Market Reforms (HD01CU27, CU28)
 Two civil law reforms: a national housing register for all bostadsrätter (condominiums) with improved mortgage transparency, and stricter identity requirements for property registration — targeting money laundering in the real estate sector. Both effective 2026-2027.
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment
+### ⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk Area | Score | Key Driver |
 |-----------|-------|------------|
@@ -263,7 +261,7 @@ Two civil law reforms: a national housing register for all bostadsrätter (condo
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Aggregate Assessment
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Aggregate Assessment
 
 **Most electorally salient**: HD01FiU48 (fuel/energy relief — direct voter pocket benefit)  
 **Second tier**: HD01SfU22 (migration enforcement — top-3 voter issue)  
@@ -274,9 +272,9 @@ Two civil law reforms: a national housing register for all bostadsrätter (condo
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Cross-Document Analysis
+### 🔗 Cross-Document Analysis
 
-### The Election-Year Economic Triangle
+#### The Election-Year Economic Triangle
 The FiU48 supplementary budget, the SfU22 migration enforcement reform, and the KU32/33 constitutional amendments form a deliberate electoral triangle:
 - **FiU48**: "We put money in your pocket" — economic populism targeting centrist/right voters
 - **SfU22**: "We closed the migration loopholes" — enforcement credibility targeting SD/M base
@@ -284,7 +282,7 @@ The FiU48 supplementary budget, the SfU22 migration enforcement reform, and the
 
 This pattern — economic relief + enforcement + constitutional legacy — reflects a government that expects to lose some ground in September 2026 but is positioning for a legacy and a competitive return.
 
-### EU Compliance Chain
+#### EU Compliance Chain
 Four reports this cycle are directly EU-mandated:
 - **FiU48**: EU energy tax directive minimum levels (fuel tax floor)
 - **TU21**: EU eIDAS2 Regulation (state digital identity)
@@ -293,17 +291,16 @@ Four reports this cycle are directly EU-mandated:
 
 Sweden faces simultaneous compliance pressure across four policy domains. The FiU48 fuel tax cut is paradoxically both an election relief measure AND an EU compliance correction — bringing Sweden to directive minimum levels.
 
-### Enforcement Architecture Expansion
+#### Enforcement Architecture Expansion
 Both **SfU22** (migration inhibition) and **TU22** (tachograph) expand state enforcement capacity through surveillance mechanisms (geographic restrictions/mandatory check-ins; digital tachograph monitoring). Together with **TU19** (municipal port security in NATO context) and **CU27** (property registration identity verification), this suggests a broad legislative trend toward enforcement infrastructure buildup across migration, transport, and property domains.
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports | **Method**: 5-dimension scoring  
 **Updated**: 14:45 UTC — includes HD01FiU48 (new top story, extra ändringsbudget 2026)
 
-## Scoring Matrix
+### Scoring Matrix
 
 | dok_id | Electoral | Constitutional | EU Impact | Immediacy | Controversy | TOTAL |
 |--------|-----------|---------------|-----------|-----------|-------------|-------|
@@ -323,7 +320,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | HD01TU22 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | **12/25** |
 | HD01KU43 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | **6/25** |
 
-## Scoring Dimensions
+### Scoring Dimensions
 
 - **Electoral**: Impact on 2026 election voter mobilization (1=marginal, 5=top issue)
 - **Constitutional**: Affects fundamental rights, Riksdag powers, or rule of law (1=admin, 5=constitutional)
@@ -331,7 +328,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 - **Immediacy**: Implementation timeline relative to election (1=long-term, 5=pre-election)
 - **Controversy**: Opposition party resistance strength (1=consensus, 5=fierce opposition)
 
-## Top Story Recommendation
+### Top Story Recommendation
 
 **Co-headline**: HD01FiU48 (22/25 — Extra ändringsbudget: fuel tax cut + energy price relief, 4.1B SEK, election-year relief package) and HD01SfU22 (22/25 — Migration enforcement inhibition reform)
 
@@ -342,19 +339,18 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 **Third tier**: HD01TU21 (17/25 — State e-ID), HD01MJU21 (17/25 — Agriculture climate audit), HD01MJU19 (17/25 — Waste legislation reform)
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Framework**: 8-Group Political Intelligence Model | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports  
 **Updated**: 14:52 UTC — HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget) added as primary document for all 8 groups
 
-## Overview
+### Overview
 
 Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Primary focus on **HD01FiU48** (fuel tax cut + energy price relief, 4.1B SEK) as the most broadly impactful document, **HD01SfU22** (migration enforcement) for political significance, with secondary perspectives on KU32/KU33 (constitutional amendments), TU21 (e-ID), and MJU21 (agriculture climate).
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Citizens
+### 1. Citizens
 
 **HD01SfU22**: Swedish public opinion on migration enforcement remains strongly divided. SIFO polling (Jan 2026) shows 54% support tighter enforcement including stricter return procedures; 31% prioritize humanitarian protection. Working-class voters — SD's strongest demographic — overwhelmingly support deterrence measures. Elderly and welfare-dependent communities track TU21 (e-ID accessibility) as a practical concern.
 
@@ -364,7 +360,7 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Government Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)
+### 2. Government Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)
 
 **Moderaterna (M)**: Champions SfU22 as essential enforcement tool; supports TU21 as digital modernization; endorses MJU21 recommendations for efficiency-first agricultural reform.
 
@@ -378,7 +374,7 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP, C)
+### 3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP, C)
 
 **Socialdemokraterna (S)**: Opposes SfU22's elimination of temporary permits; argues it creates "stateless limbo." Supports TU21 in principle but demands privacy safeguards. Cautiously supports MJU21 recommendations.
 
@@ -390,7 +386,7 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Business/Industry
+### 4. Business/Industry
 
 **SfU22**: Transport and construction sectors (reliant on asylum labor) face labor supply uncertainty. Insurance industry monitors inhibited persons' legal status for contract validity.
 
@@ -400,7 +396,7 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Civil Society
+### 5. Civil Society
 
 **SfU22**: FARR (Flyktinggruppernas Riksråd), Red Cross, and Amnesty International will challenge inhibition orders through legal aid and court challenges. Public advocacy campaigns expected.
 
@@ -410,7 +406,7 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## 6. International/EU
+### 6. International/EU
 
 **SfU22**: EU Returns Directive (2008/115/EC) permits enforcement delay mechanisms; inhibition must comply. European Commission migration compliance reviews monitor Sweden's returns performance.
 
@@ -420,7 +416,7 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Judiciary/Constitutional
+### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional
 
 **SfU22**: Migration Court of Appeal (Migrationsöverdomstolen) will face novel questions on geographic restriction proportionality and ECHR Article 5 (liberty). Constitutional review (KU) should assess compatibility with basic freedoms.
 
@@ -430,7 +426,7 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Media/Public Opinion
+### 8. Media/Public Opinion
 
 **SfU22**: Aftonbladet, Expressen (left-leaning tabloids) will run personal stories of affected families; Svenska Dagbladet, Dagens Nyheter (quality press) will cover legal arguments. SVT will seek balanced reporting. Risk of "Sweden's cruel immigration system" international narrative.
 
@@ -440,51 +436,51 @@ Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Prima
 
 ---
 
-## HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget: Supplementary Analysis Across 8 Groups
+### HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget: Supplementary Analysis Across 8 Groups
 
-### 1. Citizens (FiU48)
+#### 1. Citizens (FiU48)
 All 5.7 million Swedish licensed drivers benefit from the 82 öre/liter petrol reduction. Rural and suburban households — disproportionately car-dependent — gain the most. Elderly households and those with gas heating benefit from el- och gasprisstöd. Transit users and urban apartment renters see minimal direct benefit. **Net verdict**: High positive reception across a broad voter base, though climate-conscious citizens (primarily MP/V voters) may view the measure negatively.
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (FiU48)
+#### 2. Government Coalition (FiU48)
 **M (Moderaterna)**: Embraces fiscal conservatism caveat — supports as temporary, emergency measure; highlights EU compliance angle (directive minimum)
 **SD (Sverigedemokraterna)**: Champions as "government that delivers for ordinary Swedes" — rural drivers are core SD demographic  
 **KD (Kristdemokraterna)**: Frames as family protection — heating costs and commuter costs both benefit family households  
 **L (Liberalerna)**: Most cautious — monitors carbon pricing implications; may emphasize "temporary" framing  
 **Coalition unity**: VERY HIGH on FiU48 — one of strongest cross-party coalition moments since 2022 energy crisis
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (FiU48)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (FiU48)
 **S (Socialdemokraterna)**: Split — working-class drivers benefit, but S climate credibility threatened by supporting fossil fuel price cuts. Expected: accept without enthusiasm, criticize "election-year populism"  
 **V (Vänsterpartiet)**: Will oppose — frames as fossil fuel subsidy; demands that savings be redirected to public transport  
 **MP (Miljöpartiet)**: Will strongly oppose — EU minimum fossil fuel tax is antithema to climate policy  
 **C (Centerpartiet)**: Will welcome privately (rural voter base heavily car-dependent) but may maintain public silence on climate grounds  
 **Opposition fragmentation**: FiU48 splits the opposition, with V/MP opposing and C likely neutral/positive
 
-### 4. Business/Industry (FiU48)
+#### 4. Business/Industry (FiU48)
 **Transport sector (haulage, logistics)**: Significant direct savings on diesel — 319 SEK/m³ cut reduces operating costs for every Swedish haulage company. Estimates: 1.5-2% reduction in per-km fuel costs for heavy goods vehicles  
 **Agriculture (LRF)**: Combined benefit from FiU48 (fuel costs) and SkU23 (EV charging) — agriculture uses both diesel machinery and increasingly electric alternatives  
 **Retail fuel (Circle K, Preem, ST1, OKQ8)**: Volume increase expected as price elasticity triggers additional fill-up frequency  
 **EV sector**: Paradoxically disadvantaged — ICE vehicles made relatively more competitive vs. electric  
 **Energy providers**: El- och gasprisstöd creates one-time balance sheet item; minimal operational impact
 
-### 5. Civil Society (FiU48)
+#### 5. Civil Society (FiU48)
 **Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF, Greenpeace**: Will run "fossil fuel subsidy" campaign framing; pressure government on climate targets  
 **Konsumentverket**: Monitors whether petrol stations pass through full savings (price transparency obligation)  
 **Consumer organizations**: Support — cost-of-living relief visible and immediate  
 **Disability organizations**: Energy support benefits households relying on electric equipment (mobility aids, medical devices)
 
-### 6. International/EU (FiU48)
+#### 6. International/EU (FiU48)
 **European Commission**: Will note Sweden temporarily reducing fossil fuel taxes toward directive minimum — no formal infringement since Sweden remains at or above ETD floor. However, Commission Energy Transition DG may express concern about signal  
 **Nordic partners (DK, NO, FI)**: Norway exempt (non-EU). Denmark and Finland have higher fuel taxes — no competitive harmonization pressure  
 **IPCC/Climate bodies**: Sweden reducing its carbon price signal contradicts Paris Agreement ambition language  
 **NATO partners**: No direct implications for defense posture
 
-### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional (FiU48)
+#### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional (FiU48)
 **Riksdagen (legislative review)**: FiU mechanism legally uncontroversial; Finance Committee finds "special reasons" requirement met  
 **Swedish courts**: No constitutional challenge expected — extraordinary budget is standard legislative tool  
 **Skattemyndigheten (Tax Authority)**: Administrative implementation straightforward — existing systems handle tax rate changes  
 **EU Court of Justice**: Compliance with Energy Taxation Directive minimum levels — no violation
 
-### 8. Media/Public Opinion (FiU48)
+#### 8. Media/Public Opinion (FiU48)
 **Aftonbladet, Expressen**: Will run prominent "How much you save" price comparison graphics — positive coverage for government  
 **Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet**: "Election-year populism" analytical angle; expert quotes on climate consequences  
 **SVT/SR**: Balanced — consumer benefit story + climate policy concern  
@@ -492,8 +488,7 @@ All 5.7 million Swedish licensed drivers benefit from the 82 öre/liter petrol r
 **International media (FT, Politico Europe)**: "Sweden cuts fuel taxes before election" story fits European right-populism narrative
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports workflow
 **Framework**: Bayesian scenario tree per `political-risk-methodology.md` §Scenario Tree Analysis.
@@ -501,7 +496,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Scenario-Space Definition
+### 🎯 Scenario-Space Definition
 
 Five scenarios span the most plausible futures for the tri-pillar package (FiU48, SfU22, KU32/33). Each scenario is conditioned on the 14 September 2026 election and on ECHR/EU-court litigation outcomes through Q2 2027.
 
@@ -527,7 +522,7 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Scenario Probability Matrix
+### 📊 Scenario Probability Matrix
 
 | Scenario | Prior P | Conditional P(Elec outcome) | Posterior P |
 |----------|:-------:|:---------------------------:|:-----------:|
@@ -541,9 +536,9 @@ Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO A
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Scenario Narratives
+### 🎭 Scenario Narratives
 
-### 🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Package Holds
+#### 🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Package Holds
 
 **Political landscape**: Coalition retained with narrower margin (171–178 seats); FiU48 sunsets 30 Sept 2026 as scheduled; post-election Riksdag re-affirms KU32 and KU33 in Q4 2026 / Q1 2027; SfU22 amended minor-procedurally to address Migrationsöverdomstolen preliminary ruling (e.g. narrower geographic-restriction radius).
 
@@ -555,7 +550,7 @@ Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO A
 - Opposition narrative: "They bought your votes and walked"
 - Coalition narrative: "We delivered relief + reform + legacy"
 
-### 🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tailwind
+#### 🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tailwind
 
 **Political landscape**: Coalition retained + gains. FiU48 extended to 31 Dec 2026 then gradually unwound to March 2027. Constitutional package passes with increased margin.
 
@@ -565,7 +560,7 @@ Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO A
 - ECHR challenge filed but government uses electoral mandate to resist
 - SD + M consolidate enforcement credibility narrative
 
-### 🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal
+#### 🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal
 
 **Political landscape**: S-led minority government forms (S+V informal support + MP confidence-and-supply). Coalition unable to form alternative majority.
 
@@ -576,7 +571,7 @@ Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO A
 - KU33: **lapses** — S-led government does not re-propose; 3-year cooling-off period begins
 - Tidöavtal effectively defunct post-2026
 
-### 🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full Reversal + ECHR Strike
+#### 🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full Reversal + ECHR Strike
 
 **Political landscape**: S+V+MP+C majority forms. Migrationsöverdomstolen issues preliminary ruling striking SfU22 §4 before new government takes office.
 
@@ -588,7 +583,7 @@ Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO A
 - Narrative victory: "Courts protected constitutional rights that parliament tried to abolish"
 - ECtHR Strasbourg filing may be withdrawn as moot
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inconclusive Election
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inconclusive Election
 
 **Political landscape**: 4–6 weeks of talks produce a technical-PM government (Schlüter/Johansson-style cross-bloc figure). No working majority.
 
@@ -601,7 +596,7 @@ Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO A
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Decision-Relevant Variables for Each Scenario
+### 📈 Decision-Relevant Variables for Each Scenario
 
 | Variable | BASE | BULL | BEAR | TAIL | WILDCARD |
 |----------|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:--------:|
@@ -615,7 +610,7 @@ Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO A
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol
+### 🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol
 
 Per `political-risk-methodology.md`, scenario probabilities must be updated monthly or when any of these evidence events occur:
 
@@ -631,7 +626,7 @@ Per `political-risk-methodology.md`, scenario probabilities must be updated mont
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Monitoring Triggers
+### 🧭 Monitoring Triggers
 
 | Trigger | Threshold | Action |
 |---------|-----------|--------|
@@ -643,7 +638,7 @@ Per `political-risk-methodology.md`, scenario probabilities must be updated mont
 
 ---
 
-## 📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan Considerations
+### 📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan Considerations
 
 Beyond the five scenarios, three low-probability high-impact events worth monitoring:
 
@@ -653,7 +648,7 @@ Beyond the five scenarios, three low-probability high-impact events worth monito
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage
+### 🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage
 
 - **Risk** [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md) — BEAR/TAIL scenarios materialise top-tier risks R-SfU22-1 + R-FiU48-1
 - **Threat** [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md) — TAIL scenario = realised Threat T1 (SfU22 ECHR strike)
@@ -668,13 +663,12 @@ Beyond the five scenarios, three low-probability high-impact events worth monito
 **Next Bayesian update**: 2026-05-21 (or triggered by monitor events above).
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Framework**: ISO 31000 + ISMS | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports  
 **Updated**: 14:52 UTC — Expanded to 14 documents, FiU48 fiscal risks added
 
-## Risk Heatmap
+### Risk Heatmap
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -696,9 +690,9 @@ quadrantChart
     KU42-Oversight: [0.30, 0.70]
 ```
 
-## Priority Risks
+### Priority Risks
 
-### 🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)
+#### 🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | Score | Owner | Timeline |
 |---------|-------------|---|---|-------|-------|----------|
@@ -707,7 +701,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | R-SfU22-1 | ECHR challenge to inhibition geographic restrictions | 3 | 5 | 15 | Justitiedepartementet | June 2026 |
 | R-SfU22-2 | Political weaponization of "stateless limbo" narrative | 4 | 4 | 16 | Government comms | Election 2026 |
 
-### 🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)
+#### 🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | Score |
 |---------|-------------|---|---|-------|
@@ -719,7 +713,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | R-KU32-1 | Post-election Riksdag fails to re-affirm KU32 (accessibility constitutional amendment) | 3 | 3 | 9 |
 | R-KU33-1 | Press freedom critics mobilize against KU33 (digital seizure ruling) | 3 | 3 | 9 |
 
-### 🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)
+#### 🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | Score |
 |---------|-------------|---|---|-------|
@@ -727,7 +721,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | R-CU28-1 | Housing register implementation delay | 2 | 3 | 6 |
 | R-SkU23-1 | EV charging exemption creates unequal subsidy landscape | 2 | 3 | 6 |
 
-## Mitigation Priority
+### Mitigation Priority
 
 1. **FiU48**: Sunset clause communication — government must proactively frame September 30, 2026 end date to prevent "permanent" expectation from forming
 2. **SfU22**: Legal aid access provisions + geographic restriction proportionality review
@@ -736,13 +730,12 @@ quadrantChart
 5. **MJU21**: Assign lead agency (Jordbruksverket) with binding targets
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports | **Scope**: All 14 committee reports  
 **Updated**: 14:50 UTC — Expanded to 14 documents including HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget)
 
-## Overall Legislative Batch Assessment
+### Overall Legislative Batch Assessment
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -790,9 +783,9 @@ graph LR
     style T4 fill:#cc8844,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Dimension Details
+### Dimension Details
 
-### STRENGTHS
+#### STRENGTHS
 | Strength | Evidence | Docs | Confidence |
 |---------|---------|------|------------|
 | Fiscal relief to voters | Fuel tax cut 82 öre/liter + el/gas support; 5.7M drivers benefit | HD01FiU48 | 🟦VERY HIGH |
@@ -803,7 +796,7 @@ graph LR
 | Constitutional legacy | KU32/KU33 vilande bind next government to accessibility and seizure rules | HD01KU32, HD01KU33 | 🟩HIGH |
 | Circular economy progress | Waste legislation clarifies responsibility, enables circular economy | HD01MJU19 | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### WEAKNESSES
+#### WEAKNESSES
 | Weakness | Evidence | Docs | Confidence |
 |---------|---------|------|------------|
 | Fossil fuel price signal regression | Fuel tax to EU minimum undercuts Sweden's carbon leadership | HD01FiU48 | 🟩HIGH |
@@ -813,7 +806,7 @@ graph LR
 | Technical displacement challenge | BankID monopoly entrenched; state e-ID faces adoption battle | HD01TU21 | 🟩HIGH |
 | Climate audit non-response | MJU20 climate framework audit shows policy fragmentation | HD01MJU20 | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### OPPORTUNITIES
+#### OPPORTUNITIES
 | Opportunity | Evidence | Docs | Confidence |
 |------------|---------|------|------------|
 | Economic narrative dominance | FiU48 gives government "on your side" economic story | HD01FiU48 | 🟦VERY HIGH |
@@ -822,7 +815,7 @@ graph LR
 | Housing market reform credit | Two CU reforms improve consumer protection | HD01CU27, HD01CU28 | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Environmental compliance | MJU19 positions Sweden as circular economy leader | HD01MJU19 | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### THREATS
+#### THREATS
 | Threat | L×I | Docs | Confidence |
 |-------|-----|------|------------|
 | Opposition reframes FiU48 as fossil fuel subsidy | 16 | HD01FiU48 | 🟩HIGH |
@@ -834,8 +827,7 @@ graph LR
 | KU32/KU33 campaign mobilization against constitutional amendments | 10 | HD01KU32, HD01KU33 | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -851,7 +843,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment
+### 🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -877,7 +869,7 @@ graph LR
     style PB1 fill:#FF9800,color:#000
 ```
 
-### Dimension Scores (0–5)
+#### Dimension Scores (0–5)
 
 | Dimension | Score | Primary evidence | Direction |
 |-----------|:-----:|------------------|-----------|
@@ -892,7 +884,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat "SfU22 struck down by court"
+### 🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat "SfU22 struck down by court"
 
 The `political-threat-framework.md` mandates Attack Trees for the top threat.
 
@@ -917,7 +909,7 @@ graph TB
     style A1 fill:#FFC107,color:#000
 ```
 
-### Leaf-Node Attributes (per framework §Attack Tree Construction Protocol)
+#### Leaf-Node Attributes (per framework §Attack Tree Construction Protocol)
 
 | Leaf | Feasibility | Detectability | Cost to actor | Evidence |
 |------|:-----------:|:-------------:|:-------------:|----------|
@@ -931,7 +923,7 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## ⛓️ Section 3: Political Kill Chain — SfU22 ECHR Challenge Progression
+### ⛓️ Section 3: Political Kill Chain — SfU22 ECHR Challenge Progression
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -950,7 +942,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style Ach fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFF
 ```
 
-### Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment
+#### Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment
 
 | Stage | Current status | Disruption opportunity (for government) |
 |-------|----------------|----------------------------------------|
@@ -964,7 +956,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — SfU22 Primary Threat Actor
+### 💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — SfU22 Primary Threat Actor
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -990,7 +982,7 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 👤 Section 5: Threat Actor ICO Profile — FARR-led Coalition
+### 👤 Section 5: Threat Actor ICO Profile — FARR-led Coalition
 
 | Dimension | Assessment |
 |-----------|-----------|
@@ -1002,23 +994,23 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Section 6: Secondary Threats
+### 🎯 Section 6: Secondary Threats
 
-### T2 — FiU48 Climate-Framework Accountability Bypass (Severity 3)
+#### T2 — FiU48 Climate-Framework Accountability Bypass (Severity 3)
 
 **Taxonomy**: Accountability + Narrative Integrity.
 **Mechanism**: Klimatlagen (2017:720) §5 mandates climate-impact assessment of fiscal measures with emission significance. FiU48 was expedited as emergency supplementary budget, compressing that review. Klimatpolitiska rådet's Q3 2026 memo is expected to flag the bypass.
 **Disruption**: Government proactively publishes retrospective climate-impact note before Q3 2026.
 **Evidence**: HD01FiU48 motivering §3 (emergency justification); Skr. 2025/26:95 (MJU20 Riksrevisionen audit of Climate Policy Framework).
 
-### T3 — Dual *Vilande* Post-Election Failure (Severity 3)
+#### T3 — Dual *Vilande* Post-Election Failure (Severity 3)
 
 **Taxonomy**: Democratic Process.
 **Mechanism**: RF 8:14 *vilande* mechanism requires identical wording in next Riksdag. KU33 (digital-seizure *access restriction* via TF-amendment) has ≤50% re-affirmation probability in BEAR scenarios (see [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) §*Vilande* Math) — an S-led government could view the restriction as an undue narrowing of public-records access and decline to re-propose. Failure to re-affirm triggers three-year waiting period before re-proposal.
 **Disruption**: None during this parliament; probability depends on 14 Sept election outcome.
 **Evidence**: HD01KU32, HD01KU33 *vilande* status confirmed in betänkandetexts.
 
-### T4 — Banking Sector Lobbying vs TU21 (Severity 2–3)
+#### T4 — Banking Sector Lobbying vs TU21 (Severity 2–3)
 
 **Taxonomy**: Power Balance + Legislative Integrity.
 **Mechanism**: Svenska Bankföreningen + BankID consortium have demonstrated 2018–2024 pattern of delaying legislation via regulatory capture of utredning references. eIDAS2 deadline 2026 narrows the window.
@@ -1027,7 +1019,7 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Section 7: Cross-Methodology Linkage
+### 🔁 Section 7: Cross-Methodology Linkage
 
 - **Threat T1 (SfU22 ECHR)** → Risk [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md) R-SfU22-1 (L=3, I=5, Score=15) + SWOT [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md) W2 "ECHR exposure" + Stakeholder [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md) §3 opposition framing.
 - **Threat T2 (FiU48 accountability)** → Risk R-FiU48-1 (L=4, I=4, Score=16) + SWOT W1 "fiscal precedent stickiness" + Election lens [`election-2026-implications.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md) §Tier 1.
@@ -1035,7 +1027,7 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 📡 Section 8: Forward MCP-Detectable Indicators
+### 📡 Section 8: Forward MCP-Detectable Indicators
 
 | Indicator | MCP tool | Expected window | Meaning |
 |-----------|----------|-----------------|---------|
@@ -1048,7 +1040,7 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Section 9: Threat Evolution Timeline (v2.3 template requirement)
+### 📅 Section 9: Threat Evolution Timeline (v2.3 template requirement)
 
 ```mermaid
 timeline
@@ -1070,7 +1062,7 @@ timeline
 
 ---
 
-## 📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change
+### 📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change
 
 | Period | Overall level | Drivers |
 |--------|---------------|---------|
@@ -1086,10 +1078,9 @@ timeline
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01CU27
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1108,13 +1099,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 HD01CU27 adopts stricter identity-verification requirements at Lantmäteriet for property-title (*lagfart*) and leasehold-registration applications. This is the civil-affairs committee's **anti-money-laundering** contribution to the coalition's Tidöavtal-era financial-crime agenda: tightened identity checks prevent the use of property transactions to launder proceeds. Expected cross-party majority (≈330–0) reflects broad consensus on the policy direction, though implementation cost to Lantmäteriet is the principal operational concern. **[MEDIUM]** (summary data only)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1139,34 +1130,34 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | AML alignment | Aligns with 6AMLD + Financial Action Task Force recommendations | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Broad cross-party support | All parties back principle; only implementation details debated | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Implementation cost to Lantmäteriet | Agency remissvar cites staffing + IT costs | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Non-resident purchaser friction | Transaction slowdown for foreign buyers | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Contributes to Sweden's FATF compliance | Q3 2026 mutual evaluation cycle | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Integrates with TU21 state e-ID for verification layer | [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md) §4 | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Implementation delay if Lantmäteriet under-resourced | — | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Assessment
+### ⚠️ Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | L×I |
 |---------|-------------|:-:|:-:|:---:|
@@ -1177,7 +1168,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Significance Scoring
+### 📈 Significance Scoring
 
 | Dimension | Score | Rationale |
 |-----------|:-----:|-----------|
@@ -1190,7 +1181,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Impact
+### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
 
 | Group | Position | Impact |
 |-------|----------|--------|
@@ -1201,7 +1192,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
+### 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
 
 - **HD01CU28** (housing register): Thematic sibling; see [`HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md)
 - **HD01TU21** (state e-ID): Provides identity-layer architecture for CU27 verification; [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md) §4
@@ -1209,7 +1200,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📡 Forward Indicators
+### 📡 Forward Indicators
 
 | Signal | Window | MCP tool |
 |--------|--------|----------|
@@ -1220,10 +1211,9 @@ graph LR
 ---
 
 ### HD01CU28
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1242,13 +1232,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 HD01CU28 establishes a national register for bostadsrätter (cooperative apartments) — a long-awaited market-transparency reform correcting an information asymmetry peculiar to Sweden's housing market. Unlike single-family homes and condominiums in most European jurisdictions, Swedish cooperative apartments have historically had no centralised ownership register, creating opacity, financial-crime vulnerability, and difficulty with mortgage-security assessment. The register aligns cooperative apartments with EU transparency norms and integrates with TU21 state e-ID and HD01CU27 identity verification. Implementation timeline spans 2027–2029. **[MEDIUM]** (summary data only)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1273,35 +1263,35 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Closes long-standing market-transparency gap | CU: Finansinspektionen 2023 report cited as basis | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | AML/transparency architecture | Enables systemic financial-crime monitoring | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Mortgage-security valuation | Aligns cooperative apartments with condominium norms | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Privacy concern for individual owners | Register scope (full owner disclosure vs aggregated) debated | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Bostadsrättsföreningar administrative burden | HSB + Riksbyggen remissvar cite small-association cost | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Proptech innovation pipeline | Opens data for third-party mortgage/analytics products | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | EU transparency-directive alignment | — | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | GDPR compliance challenges on full-owner disclosure | — | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Assessment
+### ⚠️ Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | L×I |
 |---------|-------------|:-:|:-:|:---:|
@@ -1313,7 +1303,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Significance Scoring
+### 📈 Significance Scoring
 
 | Dimension | Score | Rationale |
 |-----------|:-----:|-----------|
@@ -1326,7 +1316,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Impact
+### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
 
 | Group | Position | Impact |
 |-------|----------|--------|
@@ -1338,14 +1328,14 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
+### 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
 
 - **HD01CU27** (identity at lagfart): Integrated verification pipeline; see [`HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md)
 - **HD01TU21** (state e-ID): Identity-layer dependency; [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md) §4
 
 ---
 
-## 📡 Forward Indicators
+### 📡 Forward Indicators
 
 | Signal | Window | MCP tool |
 |--------|--------|----------|
@@ -1356,8 +1346,7 @@ graph LR
 ---
 
 ### HD01FiU48
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md -->
 
 **Document**: HD01FiU48  
 **Title**: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd  
@@ -1370,7 +1359,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Document Summary
+### 1. Document Summary
 
 The Finance Committee (FiU) recommends that the Riksdag approve the government's extraordinary supplementary budget for 2026. The budget contains two measures:
 
@@ -1394,14 +1383,14 @@ The Finance Committee (FiU) recommends that the Riksdag approve the government's
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Six Analytical Lenses
+### 2. Six Analytical Lenses
 
-### Lens 1: Constitutional/Legal Dimension
+#### Lens 1: Constitutional/Legal Dimension
 The extraordinary budget (extra ändringsbudget) mechanism requires FiU to find "special reasons" (particularly strong justification). The committee accepts the government's framing. The fuel tax cut specifically aligns energy tax levels with EU minimum thresholds — paradoxically making this a compliance-oriented measure as well as an economic relief measure. No constitutional challenge expected.
 
 **Legal risk**: LOW [HIGH confidence]
 
-### Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dimension
+#### Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dimension
 This is the most electorally transparent measure in the April 2026 batch. The timing — five months before the September 14, 2026 general election — with a measure directly affecting petrol prices at every Swedish gas station — is an unambiguous electoral intervention. The government frames it as emergency relief; political scientists will note that emergency relief packages in election years are a textbook electoral strategy.
 
 **Electoral benefit**: The 82 öre/liter cut represents approximately 5% of typical pump price. With ~5.7 million licensed drivers and ~4.8 million registered cars in Sweden, the measure is personally felt by a majority of eligible voters. The rural and suburban voter profile — already disproportionately car-dependent — aligns with the M+SD+KD+L coalition's core demographic.
@@ -1420,14 +1409,14 @@ graph LR
     style Budget fill:#aa0000,color:#fff
 ```
 
-### Lens 3: Policy Substance Dimension
+#### Lens 3: Policy Substance Dimension
 The fuel tax cut brings Swedish energy taxes to the EU directive minimum — a floor set by the Energy Taxation Directive 2003/96/EC. This is a legitimate EU compliance observation, but the directive minimum was set in 2003 and has not been inflation-adjusted since, meaning it represents an extremely low floor by modern standards. Sweden has historically maintained much higher fuel taxes as part of its carbon pricing strategy.
 
 **Policy reversal significance**: Sweden had among the EU's highest fuel taxes pre-cut. Reducing to minimum temporarily reverses decades of progressive carbon pricing at the pump. If this becomes a political precedent, it complicates Sweden's Climate Action Plan targets and carbon price trajectory.
 
 **Energy support**: The el- och gasprisstöd fills a political gap — the high January-February 2026 heating season coincided with a period of above-normal electricity spot prices (due to cold snap + reduced Norwegian hydro). The government cannot change past prices but can compensate affected households retroactively.
 
-### Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension
+#### Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
     title FiU48 Fiscal Risk Assessment
@@ -1448,7 +1437,7 @@ The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% o
 
 **Economic data (World Bank verified)**: Swedish inflation peaked at 8.5% in 2023 (FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG) before falling to 2.8% in 2024 — household energy cost burden remains politically salient even as headline inflation normalized. GDP growth recovered to 0.82% in 2024 (from -0.20% in 2023), providing fiscal headroom for temporary stimulus. Total 4.1B SEK cost ≈ 0.04% of Swedish GDP (603.7B USD in 2024).
 
-### Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimension
+#### Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimension
 
 | Stakeholder | Impact | Assessment |
 |-------------|--------|------------|
@@ -1461,7 +1450,7 @@ The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% o
 | State budget | -4.1B SEK 2026 | 🟧 MEDIUM risk |
 | EV drivers (SkU23 context) | Fuel competitors benefited not them | 🟧 MEDIUM concern |
 
-### Lens 6: Forward Indicators/Timeline Dimension
+#### Lens 6: Forward Indicators/Timeline Dimension
 | Indicator | Date | Significance |
 |-----------|------|-------------|
 | Fuel tax cut takes effect | May 1, 2026 | Immediate petrol price impact at pumps |
@@ -1473,7 +1462,7 @@ The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% o
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Evidence Table
+### 3. Evidence Table
 
 | Claim | Evidence | Confidence |
 |-------|---------|------------|
@@ -1490,7 +1479,7 @@ The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% o
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)
+### 4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)
 
 | Risk | L | I | L×I | Mitigation |
 |------|---|---|-----|-----------|
@@ -1502,7 +1491,7 @@ The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% o
 
 ---
 
-## 5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)
+### 5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)
 
 | Strengths | Weaknesses |
 |-----------|-----------|
@@ -1519,10 +1508,9 @@ The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% o
 | Precedent for post-election energy policy | Competing with EV charging tax exemption (SkU23) narrative |
 
 ### HD01KU32
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1541,13 +1529,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 HD01KU32 adopts as *vilande* under Regeringsformen 8:14 a grundlagsändring extending digital-accessibility obligations to press-freedom-protected media (TF- and YGL-registered publications). Its consequence is that the next Riksdag — chosen 14 September 2026 — must pass **identical wording** for the amendment to take effect (expected 1 January 2028). Cross-party support is broad; disability-rights organisations and all four opposition parties endorse the policy direction. The threat surface is not political opposition but procedural continuity: if even minor textual amendments are required after the election, the three-year cooling-off period restarts. **[HIGH]**
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1576,35 +1564,35 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | CRPD Article 9 compliance strengthening | KU32 *motivering* cites UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2022 observations | 🟩 HIGH |
 | Aligns with EU Accessibility Act 2025 | KU32 cross-references Directive (EU) 2019/882 implementation | 🟩 HIGH |
 | Disability-rights sector unified in support | Funka + Synskadades Riksförbund remissvar supportive | 🟩 HIGH |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Press-freedom concern from small publishers | TU: SVT Online + large publishers assert cost burden for small TF-registered publications | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Enforcement ambiguity for user-generated content | KU32 §4 leaves implementation to förordning; scope unclear for comment sections | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Aligns Sweden with Nordic accessibility leadership (Norway AT, Finland WCAG) | [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md) §disability | 🟩 HIGH |
 | CRPD 2027 Sweden review reports | Strengthens narrative | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Re-affirmation risk in fragmented post-election Riksdag | [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) §*Vilande* Math: P=0.85–0.95 re-affirm | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Assessment
+### ⚠️ Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | L×I | Mitigation |
 |---------|-------------|:-:|:-:|:---:|-----------|
@@ -1615,7 +1603,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🌳 Attack Tree — "KU32 lapses without re-affirmation" (goal: lapse)
+### 🌳 Attack Tree — "KU32 lapses without re-affirmation" (goal: lapse)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -1633,7 +1621,7 @@ Low-probability threat scenario overall.
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Significance Scoring
+### 📈 Significance Scoring
 
 | Dimension | Score (1–5) | Rationale |
 |-----------|:-----------:|-----------|
@@ -1646,7 +1634,7 @@ Low-probability threat scenario overall.
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Impact
+### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
 
 | Group | Position | Impact |
 |-------|----------|--------|
@@ -1658,7 +1646,7 @@ Low-probability threat scenario overall.
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
+### 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
 
 - **HD01KU33** (dual *vilande*): Shared RF 8:14 procedural vehicle and post-election timing; see [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md) §3
 - **HD01KU42** (utgiftsområden): Constitutional-budget structure; same committee
@@ -1666,7 +1654,7 @@ Low-probability threat scenario overall.
 
 ---
 
-## 📡 Forward Indicators
+### 📡 Forward Indicators
 
 | Signal | Window | MCP tool |
 |--------|--------|----------|
@@ -1679,10 +1667,9 @@ Low-probability threat scenario overall.
 **Related**: [`HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md) (sibling *vilande*)
 
 ### HD01KU33
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1703,7 +1690,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 HD01KU33 adopts as *vilande grundlagsändring* an amendment to Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) establishing that **digital recordings seized or copied during a *husrannsakan* (police search) are not deemed *allmänna handlingar***. The rule also covers copies transferred between authorities pursuant to custody of the seized information carrier. A carve-back preserves public-records status for any recording that is *affixed* to a formal investigation or to separate authority business. As a grundlagsändring, re-affirmation by the post-election Riksdag is required; intended effect date 1 January 2027.
 
@@ -1711,7 +1698,7 @@ Politically this is a **transparency-restricting** move, not a transparency-enha
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1739,9 +1726,9 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Clarifies anomalous TF treatment of bulk digital-evidence copies | KU33 *motivering* references prior cases where whole mirrored drives became searchable public records | 🟩 HIGH |
@@ -1749,20 +1736,20 @@ graph LR
 | Carve-back preserves TF status where material is formally added to investigation file | KU33 §on *allmän handling* retention | 🟩 HIGH |
 | Coalition (M, SD, KD, L) unified in support | Floor-vote readings from KU sitting | 🟩 HIGH |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Narrows *offentlighetsprincipen* in the digital domain | Civil Rights Defenders + Journalistförbundet remissvar critical | 🟩 HIGH |
 | Carve-back scope ambiguous for data-at-rest that is never formally "added" | KU33 *motivering* §on scope | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Creates opaque custody zone for bulk-extracted personal data | IMY (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten) yttrande flags data-minimisation concern | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Förordning-level data-minimisation and retention rules could meaningfully narrow scope | — | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Parallel non-constitutional transparency reforms (e.g., statistical reporting) could offset transparency loss | — | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Post-election lapse — most likely of dual *vilande* to fail | [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) §*Vilande* Math | 🟨 MEDIUM |
@@ -1771,7 +1758,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Assessment
+### ⚠️ Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | L×I | Mitigation |
 |---------|-------------|:-:|:-:|:---:|-----------|
@@ -1783,7 +1770,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33 lapses after election"
+### 🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33 lapses after election"
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -1803,7 +1790,7 @@ Cheapest attack path: A1 (S-led government reluctance to narrow public-records a
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Significance Scoring
+### 📈 Significance Scoring
 
 | Dimension | Score | Rationale |
 |-----------|:-----:|-----------|
@@ -1816,7 +1803,7 @@ Cheapest attack path: A1 (S-led government reluctance to narrow public-records a
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Impact
+### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
 
 | Group | Position | Impact |
 |-------|----------|--------|
@@ -1829,14 +1816,14 @@ Cheapest attack path: A1 (S-led government reluctance to narrow public-records a
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
+### 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
 
 - **HD01KU32** (dual *vilande*): Shared vehicle; see [`HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md) — but thematically opposite (KU32 *expands* accessibility)
 - **HD01SfU22** (inhibition): Adjacent state-surveillance + rule-of-law space; see [`HD01SfU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md)
 
 ---
 
-## 📡 Forward Indicators
+### 📡 Forward Indicators
 
 | Signal | Window | MCP tool |
 |--------|--------|----------|
@@ -1850,10 +1837,9 @@ Cheapest attack path: A1 (S-led government reluctance to narrow public-records a
 **Related**: [`HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md) (sibling *vilande*, contrasting direction)
 
 ### HD01KU42
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1870,13 +1856,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 KU42 concerns the division of Sweden's state budget into expenditure areas (utgiftsområden) — the constitutional architecture that defines how Riksdag controls spending. This seemingly technical matter carries significant political weight: changes to expenditure area classification affect committee jurisdictions, budget flexibility, and governmental accountability. The Constitutional Committee handling this report indicates it has constitutional dimensions, not merely administrative ones. Coming at a time when Sweden's defense budget (utgiftsområde 6) has seen dramatic increases and climate/energy policies are reshaping infrastructure spending (UO21/22/23), the division question directly affects which committees control which funds. **[LOW]** (metadata-only)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1892,34 +1878,34 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Parliamentary control | Clear expenditure areas improve accountability and audit trail | 🟩HIGH |
 | Defense budget clarity | Separating defense infrastructure from general infrastructure UOs aids transparency | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Administrative modernization | Updated classifications reflect post-pandemic policy architecture | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Inter-committee rivalry | Changes to UO classification shift power between committees | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Complexity | Complex cross-UO programs (climate + energy + transport) difficult to segregate cleanly | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Streamlined Riksdag oversight | Consolidated UOs reduce audit fragmentation | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Political manipulation of UO boundaries | Majority may draw UO lines to advantage coalition committees | 🟥LOW |
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (Condensed)
+### 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (Condensed)
 
 | Stakeholder | Position |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -1934,7 +1920,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Matrix
+### ⚠️ Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk | L | I | L×I |
 |------|---|---|-----|
@@ -1943,17 +1929,16 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact** 🟥LOW — Highly technical; not salient to voters.
 
 **Policy Legacy** — Establishes budget architecture for 2027+ electoral cycle governments.
 
 ### HD01KU43
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1970,13 +1955,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 KU43 establishes a new law governing the Riksdag's medal — replacing outdated regulations with a modern legal framework for how parliament honors distinguished service. While ceremonially significant, this is administratively routine and politically non-contentious. The Constitutional Committee's involvement reflects Riksdag's self-governance prerogatives under Chapter 4 of the Instrument of Government. The primary political significance is in how the medal criteria are defined — who qualifies and what types of service are honored shapes Riksdag's institutional identity and its relationship with civil society partners. **[VERY LOW]**
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1989,33 +1974,32 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis (Condensed)
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis (Condensed)
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 - Modernizes outdated medal statute; enhances institutional transparency
 - Clear legal basis for Riksdag's self-governance
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 - Limited substantive policy impact
 - Risk of criteria being perceived as politically partisan if awarded inconsistently
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 - Signal parliamentary institutional health and non-partisan tradition
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 - Minimal (administrative only)
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact** 🟥VERY LOW — No direct electoral relevance.
 
 ### HD01MJU21
+<!-- source: documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2032,13 +2016,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 MJU21 marks the Environment and Agriculture Committee's formal parliamentary response to the National Audit Office (Riksrevisionen) report on state support for agriculture's climate transition. The timing is politically charged: Sweden's agriculture sector produces approximately 13% of national greenhouse gas emissions, yet receives substantial state subsidies (CAP + national co-financing) without demonstrably achieving emissions reductions. The Riksrevisionen's underlying report criticizes the lack of coherent measurement systems, overlapping responsibilities between Jordbruksverket and Naturvårdsverket, and insufficient conditionality in support programs. The committee's response (expected to endorse Riksrevisionen's recommendations) marks a potentially significant shift toward tighter environmental conditions on agricultural subsidies — a direct threat to farming organizations and a potential source of rural voter discontent ahead of the 2026 election. **[LOW]** (metadata-only; analysis based on Riksrevisionen report patterns and MJU political context)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2056,29 +2040,29 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Riksrevisionen legitimacy | Audit findings carry constitutional authority; difficult for government to dismiss | 🟩HIGH |
 | EU CAP alignment | EU Common Agricultural Policy 2023-2027 requires eco-schemes; Sweden underperforming | 🟩HIGH |
 | Coalition opportunity | KD and C support sustainable farming; M supports efficiency; reform could unite coalition | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Rural voter risk | Tightening conditions on farming subsidies alienates C/SD rural voters | 🟩HIGH |
 | Measurement gaps | No established baseline for agricultural GHG emissions reductions at farm level | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Institutional fragmentation | Dual responsibility (Jordbruksverket + Naturvårdsverket) without clear lead agency | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Sweden as EU climate leader | Implementing genuine agricultural climate conditions would position Sweden above EU average | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Technology-driven transition | Precision agriculture, biogas, and cover crops can achieve reductions without income loss | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Farmer organization backlash | LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) fiercely opposes binding conditions | ��HIGH |
@@ -2087,7 +2071,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives
+### 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives
 
 | Stakeholder Group | Position | Key Concern |
 |-------------------|----------|-------------|
@@ -2102,7 +2086,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Matrix
+### ⚠️ Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | L×I | Mitigation |
 |------|-----------|--------|-----|------------|
@@ -2113,7 +2097,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact** 🟧MEDIUM — C-party voters (rural, farming) are sensitive; SD rural voters equally so.
 
@@ -2125,17 +2109,16 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Forward Indicators
+### 📅 Forward Indicators
 
 1. **May 2026** — Chamber vote on MJU21; watch for C-party reservations or amendment demands
 2. **Q3 2026** — Government response to Riksrevisionen with action plan timeline
 3. **2027** — Mid-term CAP review: Sweden assessed against eco-scheme targets
 
 ### HD01SfU22
+<!-- source: documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2152,13 +2135,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 The Social Insurance Committee's report SfU22 proposes a fundamentally new approach to handling aliens with temporary enforcement obstacles — replacing temporary residence permits with a system of "inhibition" (suspension of deportation) combined with mandatory check-ins and geographic restrictions. This represents a significant tightening of migration policy, eliminating the pathway through which individuals blocked from deportation could effectively gain temporary residence. The reform directly advances the SD-M-KD-L government's migration policy agenda and is expected to face fierce opposition from S, V, and MP on humanitarian grounds. The measure significantly reduces the discretion available to Migrationsverket and expands state surveillance capabilities over individuals awaiting deportation. **[MEDIUM]** (summary data only)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2176,9 +2159,9 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Closes legal loophole | Temporary residence permits effectively rewarded individuals who couldn't be deported; inhibition system removes this incentive (HD01SfU22 summary) | 🟧MEDIUM |
@@ -2186,20 +2169,20 @@ graph LR
 | Administrative efficiency | Migrationsverket no longer required to issue and renew temporary permits; reduces administrative burden | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Threat management | Enables geographic restrictions and mandatory check-ins for individuals posing security risks | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Human rights exposure | Inhibited persons with no pathway to residence — prolonged limbo raises ECHR Article 3/5 concerns | 🟩HIGH |
 | Constitutional risk | Creating new surveillance category without full residence rights tests Article 2 Protocol 4 ECHR | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Practicability | Mandatory geographic restrictions unenforceable without significant policing resources | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Broader migration reform anchor | SfU22 signals alignment with EU Returns Directive; positions Sweden favorably in EU migration negotiations | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | Coalition credibility booster | SD base reward — demonstrates government can tighten migration beyond just asylum | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Court overturning | Sweden's Migration Court of Appeal may strike down geographic restrictions as disproportionate | 🟩HIGH |
@@ -2208,7 +2191,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives
+### 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives
 
 | Stakeholder Group | Position | Key Concern | Evidence |
 |-------------------|----------|-------------|----------|
@@ -2223,7 +2206,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Matrix
+### ⚠️ Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | L×I Score | Mitigation |
 |------|-------------------|--------------|-----------|------------|
@@ -2234,7 +2217,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact** 🟧MEDIUM — Migration enforcement is a top-3 voter issue; SfU22 directly activates SD and M voters.
 
@@ -2248,17 +2231,16 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Forward Indicators
+### 📅 Forward Indicators
 
 1. **May 2026 chamber vote** — Will pass with coalition majority (M+SD+KD+L); watch for SD amendment requests to expand restrictions
 2. **June 1, 2026** — Implementation date; first inhibition orders expected within weeks; early court challenges anticipated by July 2026
 3. **Q3 2026** — Migration Court of Appeal first rulings on geographic restriction proportionality; determines if reform survives legally
 
 ### HD01TU16
+<!-- source: documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2277,13 +2259,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 HD01TU16 removes the mandatory introductory driver-training requirement for certain private practice driving situations. The reform addresses a commonly-criticised bureaucratic friction in Sweden's driver-licensing pipeline — practice driving with a family member previously required the supervising adult to complete a one-day introductory course (~1,500 SEK) in addition to other qualifications. TU committee concluded the training requirement did not deliver measurable road-safety benefits relative to its compliance cost. This is a low-salience administrative reform with cross-party support; Transportstyrelsen remissvar cautiously supportive. **[MEDIUM]**
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2308,34 +2290,34 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Reduces household administrative cost | Estimated ~1,500 SEK + half-day per learner household | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Aligns Swedish practice with Nordic norms | Norway and Denmark do not require equivalent training | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Coalition "regelförenkling" deliverable | Part of coalition agreement administrative-simplification agenda | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | STR (Sveriges Trafikutbildares Riksförbund) opposition | Industry body cites road-safety concern; remissvar critical | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | Road-safety evidence ambiguity | Transportstyrelsen 2023 study inconclusive on training's marginal safety contribution | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Reduces driver-licensing backlog (1.5-year wait in 2024) | — | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Road-safety framing if accident statistics spike 2027–2028 | Statistical noise likely but narrative risk present | 🟥 LOW |
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Assessment
+### ⚠️ Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk ID | Description | L | I | L×I |
 |---------|-------------|:-:|:-:|:---:|
@@ -2346,7 +2328,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Significance Scoring
+### 📈 Significance Scoring
 
 | Dimension | Score | Rationale |
 |-----------|:-----:|-----------|
@@ -2359,7 +2341,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Impact
+### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
 
 | Group | Position | Impact |
 |-------|----------|--------|
@@ -2370,7 +2352,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
+### 🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference
 
 - **HD01TU19** (port security): Same committee, different theme
 - **HD01TU21** (e-ID): Same committee but non-comparable policy area
@@ -2378,7 +2360,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📡 Forward Indicators
+### 📡 Forward Indicators
 
 | Signal | Window | MCP tool |
 |--------|--------|----------|
@@ -2391,10 +2373,9 @@ graph LR
 **Confidence note**: Analysis based on SUMMARY depth; full motivtext from `hd01tu16.json` would upgrade confidence to HIGH.
 
 ### HD01TU19
+<!-- source: documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2411,13 +2392,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 TU19 introduces new legislation governing municipal port operations — a sector that intersects infrastructure ownership (kommunal self-governance), commercial port competition, EU state aid rules, and national security (civilian ports' dual-use military significance has grown since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022). Sweden has 52 commercial ports; 30+ are municipally owned. The law likely addresses operational efficiency, competitive conditions relative to private ports, and potentially security classifications. Municipal port governance is directly relevant to Sweden's Total Defence (Totalförsvar) planning, as ports are critical infrastructure for NATO resupply logistics. **[LOW]** (metadata-only)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2433,38 +2414,37 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 - Modernizes port governance for competitive environment
 - Addresses EU state aid compliance issues for municipal port subsidies
 - Can codify security classification requirements for Total Defence
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 - Municipal autonomy constraints may limit operational efficiency reforms
 - Ports vary enormously (Göteborg's massive private port vs. small municipal ferries)
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 - NATO logistics planning requires clear port command structures
 - Standardization can attract private investment partnerships
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 - Municipal lobbying against commercial constraints (SKL/SKR)
 - Security dimensions may create NATO-sensitive information sharing complications
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact** 🟥LOW — Infrastructure and local governance; not a voter hot-button issue.
 
 **Defence Dimension** 🟧MEDIUM — Parties competing on defence credibility should highlight port security improvements.
 
 ### HD01TU21
+<!-- source: documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2481,13 +2461,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 TU21 proposes a state-issued electronic identity (e-legitimation) for Sweden — a policy debated for over a decade with profound implications for digital governance, private sector competition, and citizen rights. A state e-ID would reduce dependency on bank-issued BankID, which currently holds near-monopoly status among Sweden's 8.5 million digital users. The proposal places the Traffic Committee in an unusual lead role on a digital identity issue that crosses ICT, banking, and constitutional domain boundaries. The coalition government frames this as digital equity and security modernization; the opposition and banking sector have historically resisted due to competition and privacy concerns. **[LOW]** (metadata only — full assessment pending chamber debate)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2504,29 +2484,29 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Digital equity | 15-20% of Swedish adults lack BankID access (elderly, migrants, unbanked) | 🟩HIGH |
 | EU eIDAS2 compliance | EU eIDAS2 Regulation (effective 2024) requires member states to offer trusted digital identity wallets | 🟩HIGH |
 | Security standardization | State e-ID enables higher assurance level (LoA3/4) than current commercial offerings | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | BankID entrenched | BankID used by 8.5M Swedes; state e-ID faces major adoption challenge | 🟩HIGH |
 | Implementation cost | State infrastructure build-out estimated in hundreds of millions SEK | 🟥LOW |
 | Privacy risk | Central state identity registry creates honeypot for cyberattacks and government surveillance | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Cross-border EU recognition | eIDAS2 enables Swedish state e-ID use across EU member states | 🟩HIGH |
 | Public service modernization | Enables digital-first government services for all citizens including vulnerable groups | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 | Factor | Evidence | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|------------|
 | Banking sector lobbying | Sweden's major banks (SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Nordea) will resist displacement of BankID revenue | 🟩HIGH |
@@ -2534,7 +2514,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives
+### 👥 Stakeholder Perspectives
 
 | Stakeholder Group | Position | Key Concern |
 |-------------------|----------|-------------|
@@ -2549,7 +2529,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Matrix
+### ⚠️ Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | L×I | Mitigation |
 |------|-----------|--------|-----|------------|
@@ -2560,7 +2540,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact** 🟧MEDIUM — Digitalization is a second-tier issue; salient for tech-savvy voters and elderly communities.
 
@@ -2572,17 +2552,16 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Forward Indicators
+### 📅 Forward Indicators
 
 1. **Q2 2026 chamber vote** — Expected to pass with broad cross-party support
 2. **2026-2027** — DIGG (Agency for Digital Government) designated as implementation authority; pilot program with 50,000 users
 3. **2027-2028** — Full rollout with eIDAS2 cross-border functionality
 
 ### HD01TU22
+<!-- source: documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md)_
-
-## 📋 Document Identity
+### 📋 Document Identity
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2599,13 +2578,13 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 TU22 addresses a serious problem in Sweden's road freight sector: systematic manipulation of digital tachographs (färdskrivare) — devices that record driving and rest times for trucks and buses. Tachograph manipulation enables carriers to circumvent EU working time rules, endangering road safety and creating unfair competition against compliant operators. This is an EU compliance measure with direct road safety and fair competition dimensions. The proposal likely introduces enhanced penalties, improved Transportstyrelsen inspection authority, and technical safeguards against tampering. **[LOW]** (metadata-only)
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Political Classification
+### 📊 Political Classification
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2621,28 +2600,28 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 💪 SWOT Analysis
+### 💪 SWOT Analysis
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 - EU compliance maintains market access for Swedish transport sector
 - Reduces road safety risk from fatigued drivers
 - Levels competitive playing field between Swedish and Eastern European operators
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 - Enforcement capacity of Transportstyrelsen limited relative to traffic volume
 - Swedish operators may lose competitive edge if Eastern European competitors non-compliant
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 - Strengthen Sweden's reputation for compliance in EU transport market
 - Digital tachograph blockchain verification emerging EU standard
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 - Transport company lobbying against inspection costs
 - Cross-border enforcement gaps (non-Swedish registered vehicles)
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Risk Matrix
+### ⚠️ Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk | L | I | L×I |
 |------|---|---|-----|
@@ -2651,17 +2630,16 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 **Electoral Impact** 🟥LOW — Specialist transport sector issue; relevant to union (IF Metall, Transport) voters.
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Riksdag Seat Configuration (Riksmöte 2025/26)
+### 🏛️ Riksdag Seat Configuration (Riksmöte 2025/26)
 
 | Bloc | Parties | Seats | Majority pivot |
 |------|---------|:-----:|:--------------:|
@@ -2675,7 +2653,7 @@ The government majority is a **one-seat margin (176–173)**. This makes every c
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report
+### 📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report
 
 | Dok_id | Expected floor vote | Projected yes–no | Margin | Pivot risk |
 |--------|--------------------|:----------------:|:------:|:----------:|
@@ -2699,28 +2677,28 @@ The government majority is a **one-seat margin (176–173)**. This makes every c
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 The Critical Path: SfU22
+### 🎯 The Critical Path: SfU22
 
 SfU22's expected **176–173** margin is the narrowest of the batch. Three scenarios govern pivot risk:
 
-### Scenario A — Coalition holds (P=0.82)
+#### Scenario A — Coalition holds (P=0.82)
 All 176 coalition MPs vote yes. All 173 opposition MPs vote no. Passes **+3**.
 
-### Scenario B — L-backbench dissent (P=0.12)
+#### Scenario B — L-backbench dissent (P=0.12)
 1–3 L MPs abstain or vote no on ECHR grounds (Protocol 4 Art. 2 exposure). Result:
 - 1 L abstention → 175–172 = **+3** (still passes via reduced-parliament rule if quorum met)
 - 2 L abstention → 174–173 = **+1** (precarious)
 - 3 L abstention → 173–173 = **tie**, proposition referred back
 
-### Scenario C — C-party split (P=0.05)
+#### Scenario C — C-party split (P=0.05)
 C-party (24 MPs) bloc-abstains while signalling intention to negotiate. 176–149 = **+27**, but shifts post-election calculus.
 
-### Scenario D — Tie/referral (P=0.01)
+#### Scenario D — Tie/referral (P=0.01)
 Deputy-speaker's tie-break invoked; coalition retains on tie-break in Swedish parliamentary practice.
 
 ---
 
-## 🧮 *Vilande* Constitutional Math (KU32, KU33)
+### 🧮 *Vilande* Constitutional Math (KU32, KU33)
 
 Regeringsformen 8:14 requires *identical wording* passed by two Riksdags with an election between. **The next Riksdag is unknown** — the math depends on the September 2026 election outcome.
 
@@ -2736,7 +2714,7 @@ Regeringsformen 8:14 requires *identical wording* passed by two Riksdags with an
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Coalition Unity Index (CUI) — This Batch
+### 📈 Coalition Unity Index (CUI) — This Batch
 
 CUI = fraction of coalition MPs voting with the majority on roll-call votes for the batch. Target = 1.00.
 
@@ -2754,7 +2732,7 @@ Compared with Q1 2026 average (0.99), this batch shows **no erosion of coalition
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Opposition Unity Index (OUI) — This Batch
+### 🗳️ Opposition Unity Index (OUI) — This Batch
 
 OUI = fraction of opposition (S+V+MP+C, 173 MPs) voting together.
 
@@ -2769,13 +2747,13 @@ OUI = fraction of opposition (S+V+MP+C, 173 MPs) voting together.
 
 ---
 
-## ⚖️ Reduced-Parliament (Minskad Riksdag) Implications
+### ⚖️ Reduced-Parliament (Minskad Riksdag) Implications
 
 Although the reduced-parliament quorum provisions are a separate constitutional track, the **one-seat government margin** means that if a foreign/security crisis triggered reduced-parliament rules, the current 176-MP coalition coalition could struggle to maintain a working majority within any 175-MP subset. This is the operational fragility the reduced-parliament amendments are designed to address — and is itself a reason the pre-election constitutional package is politically sensitive.
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Related Analyses
+### 🔗 Related Analyses
 
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md) — Why these margins matter
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md) — Bayesian scenario tree
@@ -2788,21 +2766,20 @@ Although the reduced-parliament quorum provisions are a separate constitutional
 **Next Update**: 2026-04-29 (post-kammaren roll calls on FiU48 and SfU22).
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports workflow
 **Framework**: Peer-jurisdiction benchmarking across fiscal, migration, constitutional, and digital policy axes.
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 Overview
+### 🌍 Overview
 
 Sweden's 2026-04-21 committee package contains four internationally comparable policy moves. This document benchmarks each against 4–6 peer jurisdictions to establish whether Sweden is moving toward or away from mainstream European practice.
 
 ---
 
-## 1. **FiU48 — Election-Year Fuel-Tax Relief**
+### 1. **FiU48 — Election-Year Fuel-Tax Relief**
 
 | Country | Year | Measure | Duration | Extended? | Outcome |
 |---------|:----:|---------|----------|:---------:|---------|
@@ -2820,7 +2797,7 @@ Sweden's 2026-04-21 committee package contains four internationally comparable p
 
 ---
 
-## 2. **SfU22 — Migration Inhibition vs Temporary Permit**
+### 2. **SfU22 — Migration Inhibition vs Temporary Permit**
 
 | Country | Analogous regime | Status of inhibited persons | ECHR litigation |
 |---------|------------------|----------------------------|-----------------|
@@ -2835,7 +2812,7 @@ Sweden's 2026-04-21 committee package contains four internationally comparable p
 
 ---
 
-## 3. **KU32/KU33 — Constitutional *Vilande* Amendments**
+### 3. **KU32/KU33 — Constitutional *Vilande* Amendments**
 
 | Country | Two-Riksdag / two-Parliament rule | Post-election reaffirmation rate | Notable failures |
 |---------|-----------------------------------|:---------------------------------:|------------------|
@@ -2849,7 +2826,7 @@ Sweden's 2026-04-21 committee package contains four internationally comparable p
 
 ---
 
-## 4. **TU21 — State e-ID vs Private-Sector Monopoly**
+### 4. **TU21 — State e-ID vs Private-Sector Monopoly**
 
 | Country | State digital identity | Private-sector incumbent | Market share | Year of state scheme |
 |---------|-----------------------|--------------------------|:------------:|:--------------------:|
@@ -2865,7 +2842,7 @@ Sweden's 2026-04-21 committee package contains four internationally comparable p
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Summary Alignment Map
+### 📊 Summary Alignment Map
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2894,7 +2871,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Comparative Framings
+### 🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Comparative Framings
 
 | Frame | Backed by | Confidence |
 |-------|-----------|:----------:|
@@ -2906,7 +2883,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## ❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid
+### ❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid
 
 - ❌ "Sweden is unique in cutting fuel tax" — 6 peer precedents 2022 alone
 - ❌ "SfU22 is harsher than other European countries" — structurally similar to German *Duldung*, less restrictive than Danish *udrejsecenter*
@@ -2918,15 +2895,14 @@ graph LR
 **Confidence**: 🟩 HIGH — Peer data validated against OECD, ECRE, and ECtHR case databases.
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-21 15:10 UTC | **Data Depth**: SUMMARY + FULL TEXT for top 8
 
 ---
 
-## 🗂️ Document Classification Overview
+### 🗂️ Document Classification Overview
 
 | # | Dok_id | Betänkande | Title (EN short) | Committee | Domain | Sensitivity | Urgency |
 |---|--------|-----------|------------------|-----------|--------|-------------|---------|
@@ -2950,7 +2926,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Classification by Policy Domain
+### 📊 Classification by Policy Domain
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
@@ -2966,7 +2942,7 @@ pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
     "Social insurance" : 1
 ```
 
-## 📊 Classification by Committee
+### 📊 Classification by Committee
 
 | Committee | Count | Most significant |
 |-----------|:-----:|------------------|
@@ -2978,7 +2954,7 @@ pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
 | **CU** (Civil Affairs / Housing) | 2 | HD01CU28 |
 | **SkU** (Taxation) | 1 | HD01SkU23 |
 
-## 📊 Sensitivity & Urgency Distribution
+### 📊 Sensitivity & Urgency Distribution
 
 | | 🔴 CRITICAL | 🟠 URGENT | 🟡 STANDARD | 🟢 ROUTINE |
 |:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -2987,7 +2963,7 @@ pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Classification Rules Applied
+### 🧭 Classification Rules Applied
 
 - **CRITICAL urgency**: Implementation < 60 days OR >2B SEK fiscal impact OR ECHR exposure
 - **URGENT**: Implementation < 12 months OR constitutional *vilande* status OR EU Commission deadline
@@ -2997,7 +2973,7 @@ pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Related Documents in This Dossier
+### 🔗 Related Documents in This Dossier
 
 - [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md) — 5-dimension scoring (electoral/constitutional/EU/immediacy/controversy)
 - [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md) — inter-document + related motions/propositions
@@ -3008,15 +2984,14 @@ pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
 **Classification Confidence**: 🟩 HIGH — All 17 documents mapped from official *riksdagen.se* document metadata + committee handling cards.
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports workflow
 **Purpose**: Trace legislative lineage (proposition → remiss → betänkande → motion → beslut) and identify thematic convergence across committees.
 
 ---
 
-## 🧬 Proposition → Betänkande Chain (primary linkages)
+### 🧬 Proposition → Betänkande Chain (primary linkages)
 
 | Betänkande | Upstream proposition / skrivelse | Parallel motions | Downstream vote |
 |-----------|-----------------------------------|------------------|-----------------|
@@ -3035,7 +3010,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages
+### 🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -3082,30 +3057,30 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Key Cross-References (Narrative)
+### 🔗 Key Cross-References (Narrative)
 
-### 1. **FiU48 ↔ MJU20/MJU21 — The Climate-Fiscal Contradiction**
+#### 1. **FiU48 ↔ MJU20/MJU21 — The Climate-Fiscal Contradiction**
 FiU48 cuts fuel tax to the EU Energy Tax Directive **floor** (the lowest rate permitted). The SAME week, MJU20 (Riksrevisionen audit of the Climate Policy Framework) and MJU21 (agricultural emissions audit) are adopted. This produces an **internal contradiction visible in the journal-of-record**: the government formally accepts Riksrevisionen's findings on climate-framework shortfalls while simultaneously cutting the most carbon-relevant consumption tax. Expect this juxtaposition in Klimatpolitiska rådet's Q3 2026 memo and in Greens/Centre opposition framings.
 
-### 2. **SfU22 ↔ TU19 ↔ CU27 — Enforcement-Identity-Border Triangle**
+#### 2. **SfU22 ↔ TU19 ↔ CU27 — Enforcement-Identity-Border Triangle**
 Three seemingly unrelated reports share an underlying enforcement-architecture logic:
 - **SfU22** creates a geographic-restriction regime for inhibited aliens (internal enforcement)
 - **TU19** strengthens municipal port security in the NATO context (external border)
 - **CU27** requires tightened identity verification for property registration (financial enforcement)
 Together they represent a **state-capacity build-out** in identity, mobility, and border control. This is the *operational* expression of the Tidöavtal's security chapter.
 
-### 3. **KU32 ↔ KU33 — The Dual *Vilande* Trap**
+#### 3. **KU32 ↔ KU33 — The Dual *Vilande* Trap**
 Both amendments are *vilande* constitutional amendments under Regeringsformen 8:14 — they lapse unless the **next Riksdag** passes them again in **identical wording**. Adopted together, they function as a **two-sided handover brief**: the incoming government cannot reverse them as ordinary law, and failure to re-affirm is politically costly (forces explicit rejection of disability accessibility in the case of KU32, or press-freedom alignment in the case of KU33). See [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md) for game-theoretic treatment.
 
-### 4. **TU21 ↔ CU28 — The Digital-ID Stack**
+#### 4. **TU21 ↔ CU28 — The Digital-ID Stack**
 State e-ID (TU21) + national housing register (CU28) together form a **digital-administrative stack** that will reshape how Swedes interact with public services 2026–2029. The digital housing register requires a trusted identity layer; state e-ID provides that layer without BankID's commercial contract. Together they displace €400M+ in annual private-sector workflow intermediation — a market that Swedish banks and proptech have controlled for a decade.
 
-### 5. **FiU48 ↔ HD024082/HD024098 (Motions of 2026-04-17)**
+#### 5. **FiU48 ↔ HD024082/HD024098 (Motions of 2026-04-17)**
 The S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) counter-motions on fuel tax were already filed during the prior motions cycle (14–17 April 2026, see [`../motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md)). FiU48's committee adoption on 2026-04-21 is the **government's procedural reply**: the committee majority rejected both counter-motions and advanced the government proposal. This compresses the motion-to-vote cycle to **4 parliamentary days** — the fastest cycle since the 2022 energy-crisis emergency budget.
 
 ---
 
-## 🌍 External Legislative Linkages
+### 🌍 External Legislative Linkages
 
 | Betänkande | EU instrument / international | Status |
 |-----------|-------------------------------|--------|
@@ -3119,7 +3094,7 @@ The S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) counter-motions on fuel tax were already file
 
 ---
 
-## 🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026 Dossier
+### 🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026 Dossier
 
 | Cycle | Relation to 2026-04-21 committee reports |
 |-------|-----------------------------------------|
@@ -3132,7 +3107,7 @@ See [`../motions/cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🔎 Lineage Confidence
+### 🔎 Lineage Confidence
 
 - **FiU48 → Prop. 220**: 🟩 HIGH (explicit in betänkande)
 - **SfU22 → Prop. 214**: 🟩 HIGH (explicit)
@@ -3145,15 +3120,14 @@ See [`../motions/cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 **Next Review**: 2026-04-28 (after kammaren votes on FiU48 + SfU22)
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports workflow
 **Purpose**: Per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` §Methodology Reflection, transparently report method, data depth, confidence calibration, known gaps, and deviation rationale.
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Methodologies Applied
+### 🧭 Methodologies Applied
 
 | Methodology guide | Applied in | Version consulted |
 |-------------------|-----------|-------------------|
@@ -3164,7 +3138,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | [`political-swot-framework.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md) | [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md) | v2.3 |
 | [`political-style-guide.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-style-guide.md) | All outputs — intelligence-grade writing + evidence density + cui bono | v2.2 |
 
-### Templates Applied
+#### Templates Applied
 
 | Template | Applied in |
 |----------|-----------|
@@ -3179,7 +3153,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Data Depth & Confidence Calibration
+### 📊 Data Depth & Confidence Calibration
 
 Per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` §Data Availability Prerequisites:
 
@@ -3194,13 +3168,13 @@ Per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` §Data Availability Prerequisites:
 | HD01CU27, CU28 | SUMMARY | MEDIUM | 🟨 MEDIUM |
 | HD01TU16, TU22, SkU23, SfU20, KU42, KU43, TU19 | METADATA-ONLY | LOW / VERY LOW | 🟥 LOW |
 
-### Confidence-Ceiling Compliance
+#### Confidence-Ceiling Compliance
 
 No analysis in this batch exceeds its permitted confidence ceiling. Per-document analyses for METADATA-ONLY documents carry explicit `Confidence: LOW` labels.
 
 ---
 
-## ✅ Quality-Gate Compliance (per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`)
+### ✅ Quality-Gate Compliance (per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`)
 
 | Gate | Requirement | Status |
 |------|-------------|:------:|
@@ -3217,7 +3191,7 @@ No analysis in this batch exceeds its permitted confidence ceiling. Per-document
 
 ---
 
-## 🕳️ Known Gaps
+### 🕳️ Known Gaps
 
 1. **Vote records not yet available** — Kammaren floor votes for this batch are scheduled 2026-04-22 / 04-23 / 04-24 / 04-28 / 04-29. Coalition-mathematics projections rely on committee-stage positions + historical analogues. Post-vote reconciliation needed 2026-04-30.
 
@@ -3233,7 +3207,7 @@ No analysis in this batch exceeds its permitted confidence ceiling. Per-document
 
 ---
 
-## 🧪 Method Deviations
+### 🧪 Method Deviations
 
 None material. Specifically:
 - Threat analysis explicitly **does not use STRIDE** per `political-threat-framework.md` §Purpose ("This framework deliberately avoids STRIDE"). A prior version of this file (commit `0ae623d`) used STRIDE; it has been rewritten in this run to comply.
@@ -3241,7 +3215,7 @@ None material. Specifically:
 
 ---
 
-## 🔁 Iterative Improvement Log
+### 🔁 Iterative Improvement Log
 
 Per the project's **AI FIRST** principle (never accept first-pass quality), the following improvement passes were performed in this run:
 
@@ -3258,7 +3232,7 @@ Per the project's **AI FIRST** principle (never accept first-pass quality), the
 
 ---
 
-## 🧩 Cross-Check Against Motions Dossier Parity
+### 🧩 Cross-Check Against Motions Dossier Parity
 
 The motions cycle for the prior week (2026-04-14 → 04-17) produced 18 analysis files. This committee-reports cycle now produces 20 analysis files (17 top-level + per-document):
 
@@ -3287,7 +3261,7 @@ The motions cycle for the prior week (2026-04-14 → 04-17) produced 18 analysis
 
 ---
 
-## 🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles
+### 🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles
 
 1. **Do not allow a news-articles run to begin before the analysis parity check** — this cycle's issue originated in a prior "Analysis Only" run that produced only 10 files instead of the full 18-file set.
 
@@ -3302,8 +3276,7 @@ The motions cycle for the prior week (2026-04-14 → 04-17) produced 18 analysis
 **Classification**: Public · **Confidence**: 🟩 HIGH on method compliance; 🟨 MEDIUM on forward-looking claims.
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-21 15:36 UTC
 **Data Sources**: get_betankanden, get_dokument_innehall
@@ -3325,7 +3298,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 > the preceding committee week. Both selections are intentional; they serve different
 > pipeline stages.
 
-## Document Counts by Type
+### Document Counts by Type
 
 - **propositions**: 0 documents
 - **motions**: 0 documents
@@ -3335,24 +3308,23 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **questions**: 0 documents
 - **interpellations**: 0 documents
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 
 All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 
 ## Election 2026 Implications
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-implications.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-implications.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Analyst**: news-committee-reports | **Framework**: v5.0 Election Lens  
 **Updated**: 14:45 UTC — HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget) added as primary electoral document
 
-## Overview
+### Overview
 
 The April 2026 committee reports batch arrives with approximately 5 months until Sweden's general election (September 14, 2026). An extraordinary supplementary budget with fuel tax relief and energy price support now sits alongside the migration enforcement reform as co-leading electoral stories — together they define the government's strategic bet for the final campaign stretch.
 
 ---
 
-## Electoral Impact Matrix
+### Electoral Impact Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -3385,9 +3357,9 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Document-by-Document Electoral Assessment
+### Document-by-Document Electoral Assessment
 
-### HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Relief
+#### HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Relief
 **Confidence**: 🟦VERY HIGH
 
 **Electoral Impact**: VERY HIGH — This is the most direct voter benefit in the April 2026 batch. The fuel tax cut of 82 öre/liter for petrol and 319 SEK/m³ for diesel (May 1 – September 30) will be felt at every Swedish petrol station. With approximately 5.7 million licensed drivers and Sweden's relatively high commute-by-car rates in rural and suburban areas, this measure disproportionately benefits the government's suburban and rural voter bases.
@@ -3410,7 +3382,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### HD01SfU22 — Inhibition av verkställigheten
+#### HD01SfU22 — Inhibition av verkställigheten
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 **Electoral Impact**: VERY HIGH — Migration is consistently Sweden's #2 voter concern (after economy). The inhibition reform directly replaces a humanitarian protection mechanism with a surveillance-enforcement mechanism. SD will campaign: "We delivered — no more residence through the back door." S will counter: "A cruel system that abandons people in legal limbo."
@@ -3430,7 +3402,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### HD01KU32/KU33 — Constitutional Amendments (vilande)
+#### HD01KU32/KU33 — Constitutional Amendments (vilande)
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH (constitutional mechanics well-established)
 
 **Electoral Impact**: MEDIUM but constitutionally unique — Both amendments are adopted "vilande" (pending), meaning the **next** Riksdag after the September 2026 election must re-affirm identical wording. This creates an extraordinary situation: the September 2026 election result directly determines whether KU32 (accessibility requirements for protected media) and KU33 (digital seizure not classified as public records) become law in 2027.
@@ -3439,7 +3411,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### HD01TU21 — En statlig e-legitimation
+#### HD01TU21 — En statlig e-legitimation
 **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
 **Electoral Impact**: MEDIUM — Not a hot-button issue, but digital inclusion resonates with elderly voters (≈22% of electorate) and immigrant communities.
@@ -3450,7 +3422,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-### HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning
+#### HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning
 **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM
 
 **Electoral Impact**: MEDIUM — Sensitive for C-party rural voter base. Green voters (MP, V) want stronger action; farmers (C/SD rural) fear binding conditions.
@@ -3461,7 +3433,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Composite Electoral Risk Assessment
+### Composite Electoral Risk Assessment
 
 | Theme | Risk for Coalition | Risk for Opposition | Net Effect |
 |-------|-------------------|--------------------|----|
@@ -3473,7 +3445,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Key Strategic Indicators (Track Before Sept 2026 Election)
+### Key Strategic Indicators (Track Before Sept 2026 Election)
 
 1. **Petrol price polling** — does FiU48 register as "government helped with cost of living"? (CRITICAL for election narrative)
 2. **Migration Court of Appeal ruling** on first SfU22 inhibition order (expected Q3 2026) — CRITICAL
@@ -3484,18 +3456,17 @@ graph LR
 7. **September 2026 budget debate** — will fuel relief be extended or reversed?
 
 ## Historical Baseline
-
-_Source: [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-baseline.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Purpose
+### 🎯 Purpose
 
 Per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`, every significance claim requires comparative grounding. This document anchors the 2026-04-21 package against twelve prior spring committee weeks to answer: **is this cycle ordinary, elevated, or historically anomalous?**
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Spring Committee-Week Baselines 2014–2026
+### 📊 Spring Committee-Week Baselines 2014–2026
 
 Indexed to mid-April committee weeks (~T-20 weeks to mid-term, ~T-20 weeks before general elections in election years).
 
@@ -3519,15 +3490,15 @@ Indexed to mid-April committee weeks (~T-20 weeks to mid-term, ~T-20 weeks befor
 
 ---
 
-## 🔎 Position of 2026-04-21 in Historical Context
+### 🔎 Position of 2026-04-21 in Historical Context
 
-### 1. **Volume is average** (14 reports vs 13.4 mean 2014–2025)
+#### 1. **Volume is average** (14 reports vs 13.4 mean 2014–2025)
 The report count itself is unremarkable. The concentration at the top of the significance matrix is not.
 
-### 2. **Top-story significance is tied for highest since 2014** (22/25)
+#### 2. **Top-story significance is tied for highest since 2014** (22/25)
 Equals only 2022 (HögElPris energy-crisis subsidies during the Russian energy shock). 2022 and 2026 are the **only two spring cycles** to combine a **>2B SEK supplementary budget with a pre-election timing window ≤5 months**.
 
-### 3. **Triple-pillar convergence is unprecedented**
+#### 3. **Triple-pillar convergence is unprecedented**
 No prior spring cycle 2014–2025 contains all three of:
 - Election-year supplementary budget (>2B SEK) ✅ FiU48
 - Enforcement flagship with ECHR exposure ✅ SfU22
@@ -3535,7 +3506,7 @@ No prior spring cycle 2014–2025 contains all three of:
 
 The closest precedents each feature **one** of these: 2022 (supplementary budget only), 2017 (single *vilande* only), 2023 (enforcement flagship only without fiscal).
 
-### 4. **The fiscal-then-election interval is extraordinarily compressed**
+#### 4. **The fiscal-then-election interval is extraordinarily compressed**
 | Year | Supplementary budget size | Months to election | Structural continuation? |
 |------|:--------------------------:|:------------------:|:------------------------:|
 | 2016 | 3.2B SEK | Non-election | N/A |
@@ -3545,12 +3516,12 @@ The closest precedents each feature **one** of these: 2022 (supplementary budget
 
 The 4.1B SEK FiU48 package matures (sunsets) **14 days after** the election — a structural feature absent from every comparable precedent. This is the **single most politically compressed fiscal cycle of the 2014–2026 era**.
 
-### 5. ***Vilande* amendment dual-adoption is rare**
+#### 5. ***Vilande* amendment dual-adoption is rare**
 Since 1974 (Regeringsformen adoption), only **six** spring committee weeks have adopted two *vilande* amendments simultaneously: 1979, 1988, 1998, 2006, 2017, **2026**. The 2017 cycle is the most recent analogue — its two *vilande* amendments had an 85% and 70% re-affirmation rate respectively.
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Comparative Series — Coalition Fiscal Activism (Election-Year Spring)
+### 📈 Comparative Series — Coalition Fiscal Activism (Election-Year Spring)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -3570,7 +3541,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Constitutional Baseline — *Vilande* Re-Affirmation Rates
+### 🏛️ Constitutional Baseline — *Vilande* Re-Affirmation Rates
 
 Historical re-affirmation outcomes for *vilande* amendments passing to the next Riksdag after an intervening election:
 
@@ -3587,7 +3558,7 @@ KU33 (digital-seizure access restriction) fits the "politically-charged" class w
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 What This Cycle Is *Not* Precedented For
+### 🧭 What This Cycle Is *Not* Precedented For
 
 Claims that would *exceed* historical baselines and require additional evidence before publication:
 
@@ -3598,7 +3569,7 @@ Claims that would *exceed* historical baselines and require additional evidence
 
 ---
 
-## 🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Historical Framings (Verified)
+### 🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Historical Framings (Verified)
 
 | Frame | Backed by | Confidence |
 |-------|-----------|:----------:|
@@ -3610,7 +3581,7 @@ Claims that would *exceed* historical baselines and require additional evidence
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Related Analyses
+### 🔗 Related Analyses
 
 - [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md) — synthesised newsroom summary
 - [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md) — peer-jurisdiction baselines
@@ -3620,3 +3591,37 @@ Claims that would *exceed* historical baselines and require additional evidence
 ---
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩 HIGH on aggregate counts; 🟨 MEDIUM on top-story significance re-scoring for pre-2020 cycles (retrospective methodology reconstruction).
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md)
+- [`election-2026-implications.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md)
+- [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/article.md
index 174570124b..f9cbbd3b80 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-21
 subfolder: evening-analysis
 slug: 2026-04-21-evening-analysis
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.885Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.685Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -22,14 +22,13 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md -->
 
 **Package**: EVE-2026-04-21 | **Classification**: PUBLIC | **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
 ---
 
-## BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)
+### BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)
 
 Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three simultaneous high-stakes policy developments. Finance Committee FiU48 — an extraordinary 4.1 billion SEK supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes to the EU's legal minimum and providing direct energy price support — moved to chamber vote (expected 2026-04-22), delivering tangible household relief to approximately 9 million Swedes at a moment when GDP growth stands at only 0.82% and unemployment has risen to 8.69%. Simultaneously, the government launched a new law requiring wind turbine operators to share revenues with nearby residents — a policy designed to convert local opposition (NIMBY) to support (YIMBY) for Sweden's renewable energy expansion. These two moves together define the coalition's "affordability and green transition" pre-election narrative.
 
@@ -37,7 +36,7 @@ The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantess
 
 ---
 
-## 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Editorial decision**: Publish FiU48 as lead story immediately in EN + SV — affects 9M citizens directly
 2. **Monitoring decision**: Track FiU48 chamber vote (2026-04-22/23) and any L party dissent as coalition stability signal
@@ -45,7 +44,7 @@ The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantess
 
 ---
 
-## 60-Second Read (8 Bullets)
+### 60-Second Read (8 Bullets)
 
 - 🔴 **FiU48 fuel tax cut**: Finance Committee approved extra budget reducing petrol tax by 82 öre/l and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ through September 2026; chamber vote imminent
 - ⚡ **Energy price support**: 4.1B SEK total including household el- och gasprisstöd for ~3M households facing elevated energy costs
@@ -58,7 +57,7 @@ The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantess
 
 ---
 
-## Named Actors (≥5 ministers/party leaders)
+### Named Actors (≥5 ministers/party leaders)
 
 | Actor | Role | Significance Today | dok_id |
 |-------|------|-------------------|--------|
@@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantess
 
 ---
 
-## Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)
+### Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)
 
 | Watch Point | What to Monitor | Significance |
 |-------------|----------------|-------------|
@@ -86,7 +85,7 @@ The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantess
 
 ---
 
-## Top-5 Risks
+### Top-5 Risks
 
 | # | Risk | L×I Score | Timeline |
 |---|------|-----------|---------|
@@ -98,7 +97,7 @@ The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantess
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Meter
+### Confidence Meter
 
 | Domain | Confidence |
 |--------|-----------|
@@ -112,8 +111,7 @@ The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantess
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21*
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 <p align="center">
   <img src="https://hack23.com/icon-192.png" alt="Hack23 Logo" width="96" height="96">
@@ -128,7 +126,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 📋 Synthesis Metadata
+### 📋 Synthesis Metadata
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -143,7 +141,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Intelligence Dashboard
+### 📊 Intelligence Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -170,7 +168,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings
+### 🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings
 
 | Rank | Finding | Source | Significance | Confidence | Electoral Impact |
 |------|---------|--------|-------------|-----------|-----------------|
@@ -182,7 +180,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗂️ SWOT Summary
+### 🗂️ SWOT Summary
 
 | Dimension | Coalition (Tidöalliansen) | Opposition (S/V/MP/C) |
 |-----------|-------------------------|----------------------|
@@ -193,7 +191,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 Risk Landscape
+### 📈 Risk Landscape
 
 | Risk ID | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | L×I Score | Timeline |
 |---------|------|-----------|--------|-----------|----------|
@@ -206,7 +204,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Forward Indicators
+### 🔮 Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Timeline | Significance |
 |-----------|---------|----------|-------------|
@@ -219,7 +217,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📦 Artifacts Inventory
+### 📦 Artifacts Inventory
 
 | # | Artifact | Status | Size (bytes) |
 |---|---------|--------|-------------|
@@ -240,7 +238,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
+### 🗳️ Election 2026 Implications
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Confidence |
 |-----------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -256,8 +254,7 @@ graph TD
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor AI Evening Analysis — Classification: PUBLIC — See full artifacts inventory above*
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **SIG-ID**: SIG-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Scoring Date**: 2026-04-21
@@ -265,7 +262,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 5-Dimension Scoring Matrix
+### 5-Dimension Scoring Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -285,7 +282,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Per-Document Significance Scores
+### Per-Document Significance Scores
 
 | dok_id | Electoral | Constitutional | Fiscal | International | Precedent | **Composite** | DIW Weight |
 |--------|----------|----------------|--------|--------------|-----------|---------------|-----------|
@@ -302,7 +299,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Publication Decision
+### Publication Decision
 
 | Decision | Justification |
 |---------|--------------|
@@ -315,8 +312,7 @@ graph LR
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0*
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **STA-ID**: STA-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21
@@ -325,7 +321,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Impact Radar
+### Impact Radar
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -352,9 +348,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## All 8 Stakeholder Groups
+### All 8 Stakeholder Groups
 
-### 1. Citizens (Allmänheten)
+#### 1. Citizens (Allmänheten)
 **Impact Level**: 🔴 VERY HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate
 
 | Sub-group | Impact | Evidence |
@@ -368,7 +364,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH | **Key actor**: Ordinary Swedish households facing high energy and fuel costs
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (Tidöalliansen: M+SD+KD+L)
+#### 2. Government Coalition (Tidöalliansen: M+SD+KD+L)
 **Impact Level**: 🔴 VERY HIGH | **Timeline**: 0–3 days
 
 | Party | Position | Tension | Evidence |
@@ -380,7 +376,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Assessment**: Coalition message discipline holds for FiU48 vote. L internal tension real but manageable given vindkraft counterweight. Confidence: 🟩HIGH
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)
 **Impact Level**: 🔴 VERY HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate–Campaign 2026
 
 | Party | Position on FiU48 | Strategy | Evidence |
@@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Assessment**: Opposition in strategic bind on FiU48 — welfare concerns require affordability support, climate concerns require opposition. S's silence is strategically rational. Confidence: 🟩HIGH
 
-### 4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)
+#### 4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)
 **Impact Level**: 🟠 HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate–12 months
 
 | Sector | Impact | Evidence |
@@ -405,7 +401,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
-### 5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)
+#### 5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)
 **Impact Level**: 🟠 HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate–Medium
 
 | Group | Impact | Evidence |
@@ -418,7 +414,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH
 
-### 6. International/EU
+#### 6. International/EU
 **Impact Level**: 🔴 VERY HIGH | **Timeline**: 47 days–4 weeks
 
 | Institution | Issue | Timeline | Confidence |
@@ -430,7 +426,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩HIGH — EU infringement risk is structurally certain; FiU48 EU monitoring is probable
 
-### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional
+#### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional
 **Impact Level**: 🟠 HIGH | **Timeline**: 2026-05-05 est.
 
 | Issue | Body | Impact | Evidence |
@@ -442,7 +438,7 @@ graph TD
 
 **Confidence**: 🟧MEDIUM (depends on KU conclusions not yet published)
 
-### 8. Media/Public Opinion
+#### 8. Media/Public Opinion
 **Impact Level**: 🟠 HIGH | **Timeline**: Immediate
 
 | Narrative | Expected Frame | Direction | Evidence |
@@ -459,8 +455,7 @@ graph TD
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 — Confidence: 🟩HIGH*
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **SCN-ID**: SCN-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
@@ -468,7 +463,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Taxonomy
+### Scenario Taxonomy
 
 ```mermaid
 mindmap
@@ -484,9 +479,9 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Base Scenario Analysis
+### Base Scenario Analysis
 
-### B1: Smooth Coalition Passage (Probability: 65%)
+#### B1: Smooth Coalition Passage (Probability: 65%)
 
 **Trigger**: FiU48 passes chamber vote 2026-04-22 without L party defection; Vindkraft law clears committee by 2026-05-15.
 
@@ -513,7 +508,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-### B2: L Party Fracture (Probability: 18%)
+#### B2: L Party Fracture (Probability: 18%)
 
 **Trigger**: L Riksdag caucus splits on FiU48 — 3+ L MPs abstain or vote No, forcing minority passage.
 
@@ -539,7 +534,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-### B3: EU-Forced Policy Recalibration (Probability: 17%)
+#### B3: EU-Forced Policy Recalibration (Probability: 17%)
 
 **Trigger**: European Commission issues formal challenge to FiU48 (Energy Tax Directive violation) within 14 days; Sweden forced to modify or delay implementation.
 
@@ -557,9 +552,9 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Wild Card Scenarios
+### Wild Card Scenarios
 
-### W1: Early Election Triggered (Probability: 3%)
+#### W1: Early Election Triggered (Probability: 3%)
 
 **Trigger**: FiU48 chamber vote fails due to surprise SD-L-M internal split; Kristersson announces confidence vote; early election (before September).
 
@@ -569,7 +564,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-### W2: EU Emergency Injunction (Probability: 2%)
+#### W2: EU Emergency Injunction (Probability: 2%)
 
 **Trigger**: European Commission takes emergency action within 48 hours of FiU48 chamber vote to block implementation; first such action against a member state's supplementary budget.
 
@@ -579,7 +574,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)
+### Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)
 
 For the central question: **"Will FiU48 pass the chamber vote without major incident?"**
 
@@ -594,7 +589,7 @@ For the central question: **"Will FiU48 pass the chamber vote without major inci
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Monitoring Dashboard
+### Scenario Monitoring Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -606,7 +601,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Strategic Implications for 2026 Election
+### Strategic Implications for 2026 Election
 
 | Scenario | Election Outcome Implication |
 |----------|--------------------------|
@@ -618,8 +613,7 @@ xychart-beta
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21*
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **RSK-ID**: RSK-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21
@@ -628,7 +622,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Heat Map
+### Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -651,7 +645,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Detailed Risk Register
+### Detailed Risk Register
 
 | Risk ID | Risk Title | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | L×I Score | Owner | Timeline | Mitigation |
 |---------|-----------|-----------------|-------------|-----------|-------|----------|-----------|
@@ -666,7 +660,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Stability Risk Analysis
+### Coalition Stability Risk Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -690,7 +684,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Trends from Previous Analysis
+### Risk Trends from Previous Analysis
 
 | Risk | Yesterday (2026-04-20) | Today (2026-04-21) | Change |
 |------|----------------------|-------------------|--------|
@@ -701,7 +695,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Summary Risk Assessment
+### Summary Risk Assessment
 
 **Top 3 Risks requiring immediate monitoring:**
 
@@ -714,8 +708,7 @@ graph TD
 *Confidence: 🟩HIGH | Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0*
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **SWOT-ID**: SWT-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21
@@ -724,7 +717,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Quadrant Mapping
+### Quadrant Mapping
 
 ```mermaid
 mindmap
@@ -763,9 +756,9 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Full SWOT Matrix
+### Full SWOT Matrix
 
-### Strengths (Coalition: Tidöalliansen M+SD+KD+L)
+#### Strengths (Coalition: Tidöalliansen M+SD+KD+L)
 
 | Strength | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -775,7 +768,7 @@ mindmap
 | **Constitutional accountability operational** | KU G16 (Svantesson) + G34 (Wallström) hearings proceed — demonstrates functioning parliamentary oversight | HDC220260421ou1/ou2 | 🟩HIGH |
 | **TU16 simplification** | Removal of mandatory introduction course for B-license practice driving — regulatory simplification message | HD01TU16 | 🟩HIGH |
 
-### Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalliansen)
+#### Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalliansen)
 
 | Weakness | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -784,7 +777,7 @@ mindmap
 | **Andreas Carlson infrastructure accumulation** | 9 interpellations against KD Infrastructure Minister covering rail closures, road safety, housing, airports, defense. Creates "minister in crisis" meta-narrative | HD10434 and prior IPs | 🟩HIGH |
 | **L party climate tension** | Liberals historically support green taxation; supporting fossil subsidy is ideological compromise. Risk of "only for the election" framing | RT-1353 scenario B | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)
+#### Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)
 
 | Strength | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -793,7 +786,7 @@ mindmap
 | **Women's welfare dual attack** | Two interpellations against Nina Larsson (L) filed same day: EU Pay Directive + women's shelter closures. "Minister failing women on two fronts" narrative | HD10437, HD10438 | 🟩HIGH |
 | **Systematic accountability documentation** | S filed 11 of 14 most recent interpellations — building a timestamped record of government failures to mobilize in campaign | Interpellations synthesis | 🟩HIGH |
 
-### Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)
+#### Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)
 
 | Weakness | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|---------|--------|-----------|
@@ -801,7 +794,7 @@ mindmap
 | **S silent on deportation** | Despite filing motions on reception and housing immigration laws, S avoided HD024090/95/97 deportation cluster — revealed strategic weakness on enforcement narrative | Motions synthesis | 🟩HIGH |
 | **"Chaos coalition" risk** | When four opposition parties coordinate too visibly, M+SD frame it as "opposition chaos" — hurts opposition messaging | Motions synthesis | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 | Opportunity | Mechanism | Timeline | Confidence |
 |-------------|-----------|----------|-----------|
@@ -809,7 +802,7 @@ mindmap
 | **KU constrains opposition on Wallström** | G34 hearing of Wallström forces S to defend prior government decisions on foreign policy | 2026-05 est. | 🟧MEDIUM |
 | **SiS reform institutional care** | Government commitment to improving conditions for children in institutional care shows social welfare responsiveness | 2026-04-20 (press release) | 🟧MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 | Threat | Mechanism | Probability | Severity | Confidence |
 |--------|-----------|------------|---------|-----------|
@@ -820,7 +813,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition vs Opposition SWOT
+### Coalition vs Opposition SWOT
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -844,8 +837,7 @@ quadrantChart
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor AI Evening Analysis — Confidence: 🟩HIGH*
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **THR-ID**: THR-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21
@@ -854,7 +846,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Taxonomy Network
+### Threat Taxonomy Network
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -895,16 +887,16 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Category Details
+### Threat Category Details
 
-### Category 1: Institutional Threats
+#### Category 1: Institutional Threats
 
 | Threat | Actor | Severity (1-5) | Evidence | Timeline |
 |--------|-------|---------------|---------|---------|
 | KU G16 formal observation on Svantesson | Konstitutionsutskottet | 4 | KU G16 open hearing 2026-04-21 | 2026-05-05 |
 | Constitutional norm erosion via executive overreach | Government | 3 | Background pattern across 2025/26 | Ongoing |
 
-### Category 2: Legislative Threats
+#### Category 2: Legislative Threats
 
 | Threat | Actor | Severity (1-5) | Evidence | Timeline |
 |--------|-------|---------------|---------|---------|
@@ -912,7 +904,7 @@ graph TD
 | SfU22 ECHR incompatibility | Government | 4 | Inhibition replacing temporary permits | 2026-06-01 |
 | 21 opposition motions unaddressed | Opposition | 3 | HD024076-HD024089 etc. | Committee cycles |
 
-### Category 3: External/EU Threats
+#### Category 3: External/EU Threats
 
 | Threat | Actor | Severity (1-5) | Evidence | Timeline |
 |--------|-------|---------------|---------|---------|
@@ -920,21 +912,21 @@ graph TD
 | EU fossil subsidy monitoring FiU48 | EU Commission | 4 | EU Energy Tax Directive minimum breach | 2-4 weeks |
 | Gaza flotilla diplomatic incident | Israel/International | 3 | HD11731 question to Malmer Stenergard | Immediate |
 
-### Category 4: Electoral Threats
+#### Category 4: Electoral Threats
 
 | Threat | Actor | Severity (1-5) | Evidence | Timeline |
 |--------|-------|---------------|---------|---------|
 | Opposition 4-party immigration coordination | S/V/MP/C bloc | 4 | 21 motions including 4-party reception law cluster | Campaign 2026 |
 | S affordability credibility trap | Social Democrats | 3 | Cannot oppose FiU48 without appearing anti-household | Ongoing |
 
-### Category 5: Fiscal Threats
+#### Category 5: Fiscal Threats
 
 | Threat | Actor | Severity (1-5) | Evidence | Timeline |
 |--------|-------|---------------|---------|---------|
 | FiU48 structural deficit impact | Government | 3 | 4.1B SEK in 2026; structural budget impact | 2026 fiscal year |
 | Rural service closures (Skatteverket Vetlanda) | Government | 2 | HD11732 question | Immediate |
 
-### Category 6: Security Threats
+#### Category 6: Security Threats
 
 | Threat | Actor | Severity (1-5) | Evidence | Timeline |
 |--------|-------|---------------|---------|---------|
@@ -943,7 +935,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Overall Threat Level Assessment
+### Overall Threat Level Assessment
 
 **Confidence Near HIGH** | Overall Threat Level: **HIGH**
 
@@ -952,8 +944,7 @@ The combination of a pending EU infringement deadline (47 days), climate law obl
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0*
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **CMP-ID**: CMP-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
@@ -961,13 +952,13 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## Overview
+### Overview
 
 Today's Swedish parliamentary activity — a pre-election fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48), renewable energy revenue-sharing law, and EU Pay Directive compliance deadline — has direct parallels in at least five EU member states. This comparative analysis benchmarks each policy against international experience.
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Pre-Election Fuel Tax Cuts: Cross-EU Comparison
+### 1. Pre-Election Fuel Tax Cuts: Cross-EU Comparison
 
 Sweden's HD01FiU48 reduces petrol excise by 82 öre/litre through September 2026 (election day) at a cost of ~4.1B SEK. How does this compare to peer nations?
 
@@ -986,7 +977,7 @@ Sweden's HD01FiU48 reduces petrol excise by 82 öre/litre through September 2026
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Wind Energy Revenue Sharing: International Benchmarks
+### 2. Wind Energy Revenue Sharing: International Benchmarks
 
 The new Swedish law (announced by Johan Britz 2026-04-21) requires turbine operators to share revenues with residents within 9 turbine-heights radius.
 
@@ -1003,7 +994,7 @@ The new Swedish law (announced by Johan Britz 2026-04-21) requires turbine opera
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Constitutional Review of Finance Ministers: Nordic Comparison
+### 3. Constitutional Review of Finance Ministers: Nordic Comparison
 
 KU G16 hearing on Elisabeth Svantesson (M) on fiscal governance:
 
@@ -1018,7 +1009,7 @@ KU G16 hearing on Elisabeth Svantesson (M) on fiscal governance:
 
 ---
 
-## 4. EU Pay Transparency Directive: Member State Compliance Map
+### 4. EU Pay Transparency Directive: Member State Compliance Map
 
 Sweden (Nina Larsson, L, 47 days remaining):
 
@@ -1037,7 +1028,7 @@ Sweden (Nina Larsson, L, 47 days remaining):
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Opposition Coordination Waves: Comparative Analysis
+### 5. Opposition Coordination Waves: Comparative Analysis
 
 Sweden's 21 coordinated S/V/MP/C counter-motions (2026-04-21) on immigration and fiscal policy:
 
@@ -1053,7 +1044,7 @@ Sweden's 21 coordinated S/V/MP/C counter-motions (2026-04-21) on immigration and
 
 ---
 
-## Summary: Sweden's Position in EU Policy Space (April 2026)
+### Summary: Sweden's Position in EU Policy Space (April 2026)
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1074,8 +1065,7 @@ quadrantChart
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21*
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md -->
 
 **CLS-ID**: CLS-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Classification Date**: 2026-04-21
@@ -1083,7 +1073,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Sensitivity Decision Tree
+### Sensitivity Decision Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1116,7 +1106,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Per-Document Classification Table
+### Per-Document Classification Table
 
 | dok_id | Title (abbreviated) | Sensitivity | Policy Domain | Urgency | Significance |
 |--------|--------------------|-----------|----|---------|-------------|
@@ -1134,7 +1124,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Domain Classification
+### Domain Classification
 
 | Policy Domain | Documents | Combined Significance |
 |---------------|----------|----------------------|
@@ -1147,7 +1137,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Publication Decision
+### Publication Decision
 
 | Article | Status | Classification | Labels |
 |---------|--------|---------------|--------|
@@ -1157,8 +1147,7 @@ graph TD
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis — Classification: PUBLIC*
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **XRF-ID**: XRF-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21
@@ -1166,7 +1155,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Document Relationship Graph
+### Document Relationship Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1204,7 +1193,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-Reference Table
+### Cross-Reference Table
 
 | Primary dok_id | Linked dok_id(s) | Relationship Type | Significance |
 |---------------|-----------------|------------------|-------------|
@@ -1220,7 +1209,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Last 3 Days)
+### Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Last 3 Days)
 
 | Watchpoint | Source | Status |
 |-----------|--------|--------|
@@ -1233,7 +1222,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Government Activity — Cross-Ministry Coherence
+### Government Activity — Cross-Ministry Coherence
 
 | Ministry | Activity Type | Coherence Assessment |
 |---------|--------------|---------------------|
@@ -1245,17 +1234,16 @@ graph TD
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0*
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **MTH-ID**: MTH-2026-04-21-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-21 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
 
 ---
 
-## Analysis Quality Assessment
+### Analysis Quality Assessment
 
-### Methodology Version: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0
+#### Methodology Version: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0
 
 | Phase | Target Duration | Actual Duration | Quality Assessment |
 |-------|---------------|----------------|-------------------|
@@ -1264,7 +1252,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | AI Analysis Pass 1 | 6–21 min | ~14 min (7 core artifacts) | 🟡 Compressed by context compaction |
 | AI Analysis Pass 2 | 21–28 min | ~22 min (7 additional artifacts) | ✅ Full second pass |
 
-### Analysis Depth: `deep`
+#### Analysis Depth: `deep`
 
 | Requirement | Target | Actual | Met? |
 |-------------|--------|--------|------|
@@ -1279,7 +1267,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## MCP Tool Performance
+### MCP Tool Performance
 
 | Tool | Status | Fallback Used |
 |------|--------|--------------|
@@ -1294,7 +1282,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (from 2026-04-20)
+### Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (from 2026-04-20)
 
 | Watchpoint from 2026-04-20 | Today's Update | Resolved? |
 |--------------------------|---------------|---------|
@@ -1307,7 +1295,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## New Watchpoints Created for 2026-04-22+
+### New Watchpoints Created for 2026-04-22+
 
 | Watchpoint | Priority | Trigger Condition |
 |-----------|---------|------------------|
@@ -1320,9 +1308,9 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Coverage Decisions
+### Coverage Decisions
 
-### Documents Analyzed (from 2026-04-21 sources)
+#### Documents Analyzed (from 2026-04-21 sources)
 
 | dok_id | Analysis Depth | Included in Articles |
 |--------|--------------|---------------------|
@@ -1338,7 +1326,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | KU G16 (Svantesson) | ✅ DEEP | ✅ EN + SV section |
 | KU G34 (Wallström) | ✅ DEEP | ✅ EN + SV section |
 
-### Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollination
+#### Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollination
 
 | Source | Elements Borrowed |
 |--------|-----------------|
@@ -1349,7 +1337,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Process Improvement Notes
+### Process Improvement Notes
 
 1. **`get_calendar_events` workaround**: Tool consistently returns HTML rather than calendar data. Reliable fallback: `search_dokument` with `doktyp: "bet"` + `organ: "KU"` for constitutional hearings.
 2. **`populate-analysis-data.ts` timeout**: Script times out when MCP server is slow. Use `download-parliamentary-data.ts` as first-choice — faster, targeted, reliable.
@@ -1359,7 +1347,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Quality Confidence Assessment
+### Quality Confidence Assessment
 
 **Overall Analysis Confidence**: 🟩 HIGH
 
@@ -1375,8 +1363,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 *Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21*
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-21 18:24 UTC
 **Data Sources**: get_propositioner, get_motioner, get_betankanden, search_voteringar, search_anforanden, get_fragor, get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
@@ -1391,7 +1378,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 > `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` and using templates
 > from `analysis/templates/`.
 
-## Document Counts by Type
+### Document Counts by Type
 
 - **propositions**: 30 documents
 - **motions**: 30 documents
@@ -1401,7 +1388,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **questions**: 30 documents
 - **interpellations**: 30 documents
 
-## Date-Filtered Documents for 2026-04-21
+### Date-Filtered Documents for 2026-04-21
 
 | dok_id | Title | Typ | Organ | Significance |
 |--------|-------|-----|-------|-------------|
@@ -1414,7 +1401,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD11731 | Sveriges agerande för att skydda sina medborgare i Gazaflottiljen | frå | - | 6/10 |
 | HD11732 | Planerad nedläggning av Skatteverkets kontor i Vetlanda | frå | - | 4/10 |
 
-## Sibling Analysis Cross-References
+### Sibling Analysis Cross-References
 
 | Sibling Type | Documents | Key Finding |
 |--------------|----------|-------------|
@@ -1423,9 +1410,27 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | motions | 21 (opposition cluster 2026-04-13-17) | 4-party coordinated immigration counter-motions |
 | realtime-1353 | 7 (HD01FiU48 + KU hearings + IPs) | FiU48 + vindkraft law = coalition "affordability+green" |
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 
 All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 World Bank data: GDP 0.82% (2024), Inflation 2.84% (2024), Unemployment 8.69% (2025)
 Calendar API: HTML response (fallback document search used)
 Data freshness: Live (synced 2026-04-21T18:20:23Z)
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/article.md
index fbb128ed79..2f54595a9c 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-21
 subfolder: motions
 slug: 2026-04-21-motions
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.891Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.691Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -35,13 +34,13 @@ _Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed **21 coordinated counter-motions** against the government's spring legislative package — the **most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive of the 2025/26 riksmöte**. The **headline finding** is a historically rare **four-party convergence on a single proposition** (prop. 2025/26:229, *New Reception Law*) within 72 hours, with each party filing a distinct but mutually reinforcing frame. This establishes the **twin-pillar campaign architecture** (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Three Things to Know
+### 🎯 Three Things to Know
 
 1. **This is campaign-narrative construction, not coalition rehearsal.** ACH analysis assigns P=0.50 to the campaign-narrative hypothesis vs P=0.35 to coalition-rehearsal. The opposition is locking in timestamped talking points before the summer recess, not preparing to govern.
 
@@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance
+### 📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance
 
 | # | Cluster | DIW | Parties | Watch Out For |
 |:-:|---------|:---:|---------|---------------|
@@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md))
+### 🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md))
 
 | Scenario | Probability | Opposition outcome |
 |----------|:-----------:|--------------------|
@@ -73,7 +72,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely
+### 🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely
 
 | Risk | Why it matters | Update signal |
 |------|----------------|---------------|
@@ -83,7 +82,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 📣 14-Day Watch Window
+### 📣 14-Day Watch Window
 
 | Timing | Signal | What to prepare |
 |--------|--------|-----------------|
@@ -95,7 +94,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)
+### 🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)
 
 | Frame | Backed by | Confidence |
 |-------|-----------|:----------:|
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## ❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)
+### ❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)
 
 - ❌ "Opposition is coalition-ready for post-2026 government" — ACH P=0.35 only; Red-Team critique applies
 - ❌ "Four-party coordination means S+V+MP+C majority is likely after election" — BEAR scenario P=0.10
@@ -117,7 +116,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Deeper Reading
+### 🔗 Deeper Reading
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — Full ACH + Red-Team + cross-cluster interference
 - [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md) — 4-party division of labour
@@ -130,8 +129,7 @@ Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V,
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -147,7 +145,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### 🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 the Swedish opposition filed **21 motions** concentrated in **four coordinated clusters**. The April 2026 wave is the **most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive** of the 2025/26 riksmöte and establishes the **twin-pillar campaign architecture** (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. Four of the clusters cross filing-time thresholds that constitute *prima facie* evidence of coordination: the reception-law cluster sees **all four major opposition parties** (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions to a single proposition within **72 hours** — historically rare and the headline finding of this dossier. `[HIGH]`
 
@@ -155,7 +153,7 @@ The dominant strategic-logic hypothesis (ACH: P=0.50) is **campaign-narrative co
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 Twenty-one opposition motions filed between April 13–17, 2026 represent the most coordinated parliamentary opposition offensive in the current riksmöte. In an historically rare manoeuvre, all four major opposition parties — **Socialdemokraterna (S)**, **Vänsterpartiet (V)**, **Miljöpartiet (MP)**, and **Centerpartiet (C)** — simultaneously filed counter-motions against the government's flagship immigration legislation package, signalling that immigration policy will be the defining battleground of Sweden's September 2026 election.
 
@@ -165,9 +163,9 @@ The motions target three simultaneous government propositions on immigration (pr
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)
+### 📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)
 
-### Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ **LEAD**
+#### Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ **LEAD**
 
 All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 (New Reception Law) within a 72-hour window. **Dok_ids**: HD024076 (V, Tony Haddou), HD024080 (S, Ida Karkiainen), HD024087 (MP, Annika Hirvonen), HD024089 (C, Niels Paarup-Petersen). The filings are a **deliberate division of labour**: V stakes the principled-left position, S anchors welfare-state protection (anti-privatisation), MP internationalises via EU Pact compatibility, C occupies pragmatist-centrist ground with a phased amendment.
 
@@ -175,7 +173,7 @@ The absence of a joint press conference is strategic: **claimed coordination wou
 
 **See also**: [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)
 
-### Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 **CO-LEAD**
+#### Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 **CO-LEAD**
 
 Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportation — V outright rejection HD024090, C proportionality amendment HD024095, MP partial rejection HD024097) and three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:215 (time-limited housing — V HD024077, S HD024079, MP HD024086). Total immigration motions: **10 of 21 (48%)** — the opposition has made immigration its primary electoral narrative.
 
@@ -183,7 +181,7 @@ Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportati
 
 **See also**: [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md)
 
-### Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉
+#### Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉
 
 S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose the fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. With Sweden's GDP growth at only 0.82% (2024) and 2023 at –0.2%, the government's choice to cut fuel taxes in a supplementary budget creates a credibility gap on climate.
 
@@ -193,7 +191,7 @@ S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose t
 
 **See also**: [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md) · [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md) §3
 
-### Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶
+#### Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶
 
 V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation modernization. V's motion explicitly requests rejection of the entire proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports including follow-up deliveries to human rights violators.
 
@@ -201,7 +199,7 @@ V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject pro
 
 **See also**: [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md) · [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md) §4
 
-### Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)
+#### Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)
 
 Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject prop. 2025/26:216 on medical competence in municipal healthcare. C's opposition is the most striking given its centre-right profile — the party argues the reform reduces municipal flexibility and should be redesigned.
 
@@ -209,7 +207,7 @@ Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject
 
 ---
 
-## ⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique
+### ⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique
 
 > **Counter-hypothesis**: What if the entire cluster has negligible strategic value?
 
@@ -227,7 +225,7 @@ Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject
 
 ---
 
-## 🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis
+### 🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis
 
 When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fiscal, defence, healthcare), rhetorical interference between clusters creates exploitable vectors.
 
@@ -244,7 +242,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses
+### 🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses
 
 | H | Hypothesis | Prior P | Posterior P | Evidence fit |
 |:-:|------------|:-------:|:-----------:|--------------|
@@ -258,9 +256,9 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ Election 2026 Implications
+### ⚡ Election 2026 Implications
 
-### Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)
+#### Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Confidence |
 |-----------|------------|:----------:|
@@ -271,7 +269,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 | Policy Legacy | If government wins 2026, all four propositions become law and define a decade | 🟩 HIGH |
 | Cluster Value to Opposition | Tactical (talking points) ≫ Strategic (coalition rehearsal) | 🟧 MEDIUM (Red-Team adjusted) |
 
-### Analyst Confidence Meter
+#### Analyst Confidence Meter
 
 | Claim | Confidence |
 |-------|:----------:|
@@ -286,7 +284,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 📣 14-Day Watch Window
+### 📣 14-Day Watch Window
 
 | Timing | Trigger | Updates which analysis |
 |--------|---------|------------------------|
@@ -300,7 +298,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### 🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 **Recommended Title (EN)**:
 "Four Opposition Parties Unite Against Sweden's Immigration Package in Unprecedented Parliamentary Challenge"
@@ -319,7 +317,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)
+### 🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)
 
 | File | Status | Tier | Key content |
 |------|--------|:----:|-------------|
@@ -348,8 +346,7 @@ When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fis
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27 · **Methodology**: `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` v5.1 + DIW v1.0
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -364,7 +361,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted
+### 🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted
 
 | Rank | Dok_id(s) | Topic | Raw | DIW mult. | **DIW score** | Conf. | Electoral | Coalition risk |
 |:----:|-----------|-------|:---:|:---------:|:-------------:|:-----:|:---------:|:--------------:|
@@ -379,7 +376,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0
+### 📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0
 
 Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **how much the legislative axis changes the political-system reality**:
 
@@ -397,9 +394,9 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)
+### 📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)
 
-### 🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89
+#### 🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89
 
 | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----:|----------|
@@ -411,7 +408,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 | **Raw Significance** | **10.0/10** | Mean across dimensions (normalised to 10) |
 | **DIW Score** | **9.40** | Raw × 0.94 (policy-defining axis) |
 
-### 🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97
+#### 🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97
 
 | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----:|----------|
@@ -423,7 +420,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 | **Raw Significance** | **9.0/10** | |
 | **DIW Score** | **8.80** | Raw × 0.98 (electoral-definitional axis) |
 
-### 🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98
+#### 🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98
 
 | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
 |-----------|:-----:|----------|
@@ -437,7 +434,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)
+### 🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)
 
 | Cluster | Base DIW | Lower (-10% salience) | Upper (+10% coordination) | Rank preserved? |
 |---------|:--------:|:----:|:----:|:---------------:|
@@ -451,9 +448,9 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Top Story Decision
+### 🎯 Top Story Decision
 
-### Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)
+#### Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)
 
 **Why this leads**:
 1. **Historical rarity** — 4-party coordination on single proposition within 72 h is unprecedented in current riksmöte
@@ -461,14 +458,14 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 3. **Policy impact** — replaces a 31-year-old reception act with new architecture
 4. **Division-of-labour messaging** — each party occupies distinct rhetorical space, defence-in-depth narrative
 
-### Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)
+#### Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)
 
 **Why this co-leads despite lower raw**:
 1. **Electoral-definitional axis** (DIW ×0.98) — nearly full weight
 2. **S-silence is analytically revealing** — a rare case where **absence** of evidence is primary evidence
 3. **C's statutory proportionality amendment is the most legally-workable opposition motion** in the entire wave
 
-### Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)
+#### Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)
 
 **Why secondary**:
 1. **Climate-fiscal contradiction** provides the opposition's strongest government-credibility attack
@@ -477,7 +474,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### 📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -499,7 +496,7 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — BLUF builds from LEAD cluster
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md) — scenario priors use DIW-weighted ranks
@@ -513,26 +510,25 @@ Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects **h
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-motions workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-20 13:07 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## Overview
+### Overview
 
 This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026, with special focus on the immigration cluster (10 motions), fuel tax/climate cluster (2 motions), and arms export cluster (2 motions).
 
 ---
 
-## 1. 👥 Citizens
+### 1. 👥 Citizens
 
 **Primary concerns**: Cost of living, housing, employment security, public safety
 **Motion relevance**: HIGH — immigration, fuel costs, healthcare all directly affect citizens
 
-### Key citizen segments affected:
+#### Key citizen segments affected:
 - **Rural Swedes** (fuel tax): Government's fuel tax cut benefits rural citizens who depend on cars. S's opposition (HD024082) risks alienating this group. Approximately 30% of Swedish workforce commutes by car in rural areas.
 - **Welfare-dependent citizens** (reception law): The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) affects S's and MP's core voter base — those who believe in comprehensive public services for asylum seekers.
 - **Crime victims** (HD024078): S's motion demanding a dedicated crime victim law (mot. 2025/26:4078) directly appeals to citizens affected by violent crime, a growing segment of S's electoral concern.
@@ -542,12 +538,12 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)
+### 2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)
 
 **Position**: Will pass all three immigration propositions plus extra budget
 **Motivation**: Tidö agreement mandate + electoral positioning for 2026
 
-### Coalition dynamics:
+#### Coalition dynamics:
 - **Moderaterna (M)**: Supports all three immigration propositions as part of Tidö agreement. Welcomes the opposition's unified rejection — it confirms M's electoral thesis that only the right-of-centre coalition will enforce Sweden's borders.
 - **Sverigedemokraterna (SD)**: Strongly supports stricter deportation (HD024090/95/97 motivate their base by showing "the establishment is defending criminals"). New reception law validates SD's decade-long campaign.
 - **Kristdemokraterna (KD)**: Supports immigration restrictions but has some tension with crime victim law — KD traditionally advocates for restorative justice, and parent liability provisions in prop. 2025/26:222 (HD024078/84/85) are controversial within KD.
@@ -557,11 +553,11 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)
+### 3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)
 
 **Position**: Coordinated challenge on immigration, fiscal, and defense policy
 
-### Party-by-party strategic analysis:
+#### Party-by-party strategic analysis:
 
 **Socialdemokraterna (S)** — 6 motions (HD024079/80/82/84/78/81):
 - Magdalena Andersson's S is pursuing a two-track strategy: (1) accepting some security reform (not opposing deportation outright) while (2) protecting welfare state principles (anti-privatization in HD024080, integration investment in HD024079)
@@ -586,7 +582,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 4. 💼 Business/Industry
+### 4. 💼 Business/Industry
 
 **Sectors affected**:
 - **Transport/Logistics**: Opposes S+MP fuel tax position; benefits from government's fuel tax cut
@@ -600,7 +596,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 5. 🌿 Civil Society
+### 5. 🌿 Civil Society
 
 **Organizations most vocal**:
 - **Röda Korset Sverige**: Opposes prop. 2025/26:229 (new reception law) — supports S, V, MP, C counter-motions
@@ -616,7 +612,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 6. 🌍 International/EU
+### 6. 🌍 International/EU
 
 **EU Commission concerns**:
 - The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) must comply with EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024)
@@ -631,7 +627,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional
+### 7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional
 
 **Constitutional dimensions**:
 - **Proportionality in deportation**: C's HD024095 is legally robust — "systematic repeated offenses over time" aligns with ECHR Article 8. If the government ignores this, administrative courts may strike down individual deportation orders.
@@ -644,7 +640,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion
+### 8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion
 
 **Dominant media narrative** (expected coverage):
 - **SVT Nyheter**: "Fyra partier mot ny mottagandelag" (Four parties against new reception law) — likely to be front-page story
@@ -661,7 +657,7 @@ This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 oppos
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary
+### 📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -698,11 +694,11 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)
+### 🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)
 
 Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the influence-network analysis below. Listing is grouped by role category.
 
-### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)
+#### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)
 
 | # | Actor | Party | Role | Key motion(s) | Confidence |
 |:-:|-------|:-----:|------|---------------|:----------:|
@@ -719,7 +715,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 11 | **Niels Paarup-Petersen** | C | Lead signatory HD024089/95 | Phased amendment + proportionality | 🟩 HIGH |
 | 12 | **Martin Ådahl** | C | Economic-policy spokesperson | HD024088 consumer credit | 🟧 MEDIUM |
 
-### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition
+#### 🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition
 
 | # | Actor | Party | Role | Key decision point |
 |:-:|-------|:-----:|------|---------------------|
@@ -729,7 +725,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 16 | **Johan Pehrson** | L | Tidö party leader | **🔶 Weak link** — rule-of-law sensitivity on proportionality |
 | 17 | **Maria Malmer Stenergard** | M | Migration minister | Reception-law defence + SfU engagement |
 
-### ⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight
+#### ⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight
 
 | # | Actor | Institution | Role |
 |:-:|-------|-------------|------|
@@ -738,7 +734,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 20 | **Migrationsöverdomstolen** | Migration Court of Appeal | Post-adoption administrative review venue |
 | 21 | **ECtHR (Strasbourg)** | European Court of Human Rights | 3–5 year pilot-judgment potential on deportation |
 
-### 🌿 Civil-society & NGO network
+#### 🌿 Civil-society & NGO network
 
 | # | Actor | Role in this cluster |
 |:-:|-------|----------------------|
@@ -750,7 +746,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 27 | **Diakonia** | Arms-export human-rights advocacy |
 | 28 | **Svenska Freds- och Skiljedomsföreningen** | Arms-export policy critique |
 
-### 💼 Business / industry
+#### 💼 Business / industry
 
 | # | Actor | Sector | Position |
 |:-:|-------|--------|----------|
@@ -759,7 +755,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 | 31 | **Transportarbetareförbundet** | Labour union | **🔶 Split risk** — may publicly back government fuel-tax cut |
 | 32 | **Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR)** | Municipal association | Concerned about reception-law municipal-capacity burden |
 
-### 📊 Expert / oversight bodies
+#### 📊 Expert / oversight bodies
 
 | # | Actor | Role |
 |:-:|-------|------|
@@ -773,7 +769,7 @@ Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the in
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)
+### 🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -858,7 +854,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree
+### 🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree
 
 Where can the opposition coalition fracture, and with what probability?
 
@@ -908,7 +904,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) §Cross-Cluster Interference — influence patterns
 - [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md) §TOWS — stakeholder-informed strategy derivations
@@ -921,8 +917,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -936,7 +931,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses
+### 🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses
 
 Applied to the central question: *What is the strategic logic of the April 14–17 opposition-motion wave?*
 
@@ -952,7 +947,7 @@ Applied to the central question: *What is the strategic logic of the April 14–
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)
+### 🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1010,9 +1005,9 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives
+### 🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives
 
-### 🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)
+#### 🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)
 
 **Setup**: SfU/FiU/UU straight-reject opposition motions in May–June; government retains majority in September; all four propositions become law; opposition runs them as 2026–2030 campaign material but cannot reverse them.
 
@@ -1034,7 +1029,7 @@ flowchart TD
 - Reputational: moderate (climate, possible ECtHR adverse deportation judgment)
 - Electoral: favourable to government until 2030
 
-### 🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)
+#### 🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)
 
 **Setup**: Election produces S-led minority with MP support (±V) but not C; reception-law partial reversal via amendment in Q1 2027. Deportation law retained (S silence locks in). Fuel tax cut reversed. Arms export framework unchanged.
 
@@ -1052,7 +1047,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 **Partial victory for opposition narrative**: reception and fuel tax reversed; deportation and arms retained.
 
-### 🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)
+#### 🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)
 
 **Setup**: Election produces S+V+MP+C 175+ majority; full reversal of reception law, fuel tax, and partial reversal of deportation via statutory proportionality test (HD024095 adopted).
 
@@ -1071,7 +1066,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 **Low-probability but high-impact**: requires simultaneous Tidö collapse and opposition discipline — historically rare.
 
-### ⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)
+#### ⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)
 
 **Setup**: Election produces no 175+ majority configuration; months of negotiation; eventual minority government with no clear mandate. Motions cluster becomes **negotiation currency** rather than governing programme.
 
@@ -1082,7 +1077,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare
+### 🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare
 
 | Scenario | Opposition should prepare | Government should prepare | Newsroom should prepare |
 |----------|----------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|
@@ -1093,7 +1088,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique
+### 🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique
 
 > **Devil's Advocate**: What if the entire cluster is strategically irrelevant?
 
@@ -1111,7 +1106,7 @@ The Red-Team case against the cluster's political value:
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules
+### 🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules
 
 | Observable signal | Prior shift direction | Magnitude |
 |-------------------|-----------------------|-----------|
@@ -1130,7 +1125,7 @@ The Red-Team case against the cluster's political value:
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies
+### 🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1171,7 +1166,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Basis |
 |-----------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -1185,7 +1180,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - `synthesis-summary.md` — LEAD story selection and findings
 - `executive-brief.md` — 14-day watch window
@@ -1202,8 +1197,7 @@ flowchart LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1219,9 +1213,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks
+### 🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks
 
-### Scoring Methodology
+#### Scoring Methodology
 
 - **Likelihood (L)**: 1 (very unlikely) → 5 (near-certain). Expressed with Bayesian prior P(L≥3).
 - **Impact (I)**: 1 (minimal) → 5 (transformational). Impact magnitude: electoral seats, legislative outcomes, reputational cost.
@@ -1248,9 +1242,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)
+### 🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)
 
-### R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)
+#### R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)
 
 **Narrative**: The government's three-proposition immigration package (prop. 2025/26:229, 235, 215) will pass with M/SD/KD/L majority. The opposition's 10 counter-motions, while democratically essential, will all fail. This creates a **polarisation lock-in**: the government campaigns on "we secured the borders" while opposition campaigns on "we defended human rights" — both narratives are true and irreconcilable. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (World Bank data), voter anxiety about resource competition makes the government's framing electorally stronger.
 
@@ -1263,7 +1257,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 **Opposition strategic response `[HIGH]`**: S's pivot to "integration investment" narrative (HD024079) frames integration as economic productivity, not welfare spending. Combine with comparative-international evidence (private-operator clauses outlier even in Nordic context) to shift frame from "border security" to "welfare-state defence".
 
-### R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)
+#### R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)
 
 **Economic context**: Sweden's unemployment rose from 8.4% (2024) to 8.69% (2025) while GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (after –0.2% in 2023). Economic fragility makes voters more receptive to government arguments about limiting immigration-related public expenditure.
 
@@ -1277,9 +1271,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)
+### 🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)
 
-### R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)
+#### R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)
 
 **Risk**: Post-adoption, prop. 2025/26:229's private-operator clauses face challenge at Migrationsdomstolen on EU Pact Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 grounds; ultimate ECtHR referral possible within 36 months.
 
@@ -1292,7 +1286,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar → L ↑ to 4
 - Government amends to remove private-operator clauses → L ↓ to 1
 
-### R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)
+#### R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)
 
 **Specific risk**: The extra budget cuts fuel taxes, directly benefiting rural households with longer commutes. S's HD024082 opposing the cut may be read in rural constituencies as "S doesn't care about our fuel costs." S lost Norrland ground in 2022.
 
@@ -1308,7 +1302,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - Rural S MPs issue coordinated statement on HD024082 intent → L ↓ to 2
 - Major fuel-price spike (OPEC / geopolitical) during campaign → L ↑ to 5
 
-### R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)
+#### R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)
 
 **Strategic significance**: C's HD024095 on deportation is distinctively moderate — demands proportionality test (systematic repeated offenses). Positions C as potential negotiating partner with government on immigration. If C negotiates, it breaks the four-party opposition front.
 
@@ -1324,7 +1318,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - Paarup-Petersen rejects amendment talks → L ↓ to 2
 - Lagrådet cites proportionality test → L ↑ to 5 (government forced to negotiate)
 
-### R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)
+#### R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)
 
 **Narrative**: S filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235 despite filing on reception (HD024080), housing (HD024079), and fuel tax (HD024082). Signals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party. Reveals that "opposition unity" is selective.
 
@@ -1335,7 +1329,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - S leadership public statement on deportation proportionality → L ↓ to 2
 - S silence extends through election campaign → L ↑ to 4
 
-### R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)
+#### R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)
 
 **Risk**: Lagrådet explicitly critiques private-operator clauses; government forced to amend. High-impact but uncertain-likelihood.
 
@@ -1343,7 +1337,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph
+### 🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1393,7 +1387,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Risk Visualisation
+### 📊 Risk Visualisation
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1424,7 +1418,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)
+### 🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)
 
 | Indicator | Trigger | Timeline | Updates risk |
 |-----------|---------|----------|--------------|
@@ -1445,7 +1439,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment
+### 🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment
 
 **Current coalition stability `[HIGH]`**: STABLE (M/SD/KD/L intact)
 - All immigration propositions will pass as planned
@@ -1465,7 +1459,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md) — Bayesian scenario weighting + risk activation per scenario
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — Red-Team critique adjusts R01 consequence magnitude
@@ -1481,8 +1475,7 @@ quadrantChart
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1495,7 +1488,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework
+### 🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework
 
 The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition counter-strategy against the government's spring legislative package. Analysis below covers:
 1. **Cluster-level SWOT** for the LEAD immigration cluster (primary focus)
@@ -1505,9 +1498,9 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)
+### ⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)
 
-### Strengths of Opposition Motions
+#### Strengths of Opposition Motions
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence (dok_id) | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|-------------------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1520,7 +1513,7 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 | **S7** | MP's EU Pact compatibility frame (HD024087) gives cluster international-legitimacy authority | HD024087 cites EU Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 material-conditions standard | 🟩 HIGH | MEDIUM | 2026-04-15 |
 | **S8** | Division-of-labour frames cover all major voter segments (left / welfare / international / pragmatist) | Rhetoric-axis analysis across HD024076/80/87/89 | 🟩 HIGH | HIGH | 2026-04-15 |
 
-### Weaknesses of Opposition Motions
+#### Weaknesses of Opposition Motions
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|----------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1532,7 +1525,7 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 | **W6** | No joint press conference or coalition statement; coordination is visible but unclaimed | Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C | 🟧 MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 2026-04-15 |
 | **W7** | V's consistent-rejection pattern across immigration + arms creates "universal rejectionist" frame vulnerability | HD024076 + HD024090 + HD024091 all rejection-structured | 🟩 HIGH | HIGH | 2026-04-16 |
 
-### Opportunities Created by These Motions
+#### Opportunities Created by These Motions
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|----------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1544,7 +1537,7 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 | **O6** | Post-adoption ECtHR litigation on deportation creates multi-year reputational drag on government | Swedish ECHR adverse-judgment track record | 🟧 MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 2026-04-16 |
 | **O7** | MP's end-user review language on arms (HD024096) aligns with Norwegian/Dutch/German practice — standard-setting | Comparative analysis §4 | 🟧 MEDIUM | LOW | 2026-04-16 |
 
-### Threats to Opposition Strategy
+#### Threats to Opposition Strategy
 
 | # | Statement | Evidence | Conf. | Impact | Entry |
 |:-:|-----------|----------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1558,11 +1551,11 @@ The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation
+### 🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation
 
 The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves. Below: the **≥3-entry interference cells** with strategic impact on the April 2026 opposition campaign.
 
-### SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves
+#### SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1571,7 +1564,7 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 | **SO3** | **S2 (S anti-privatisation) × O2 (climate narrative)** | **Link housing-privatisation to fuel-tax private-benefit** as "government prioritises private interests over public goods" unified frame |
 | **SO4** | **S7 (MP EU Pact compatibility) × O6 (ECtHR litigation)** | **Pre-stage EU Commission remissvar + Strasbourg litigation path**; MP's HD024087 text is usable as precedent for post-adoption legal challenge |
 
-### ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening
+#### ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1579,7 +1572,7 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 | **ST2** | **S1 (4-party coordination) × T1 (government majority passes)** | **Coordinate SfU vote sequencing** — amendment first, then rejection — to prevent "disarray" framing at chamber vote |
 | **ST3** | **S2 (S anti-privatisation) × T2 (rural-voter alienation)** | **Front Norrland-anchored S MPs** (Joakim Järrebring, Fredrik Lundh Sammeli) in media appearances on welfare-state framing |
 
-### WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required
+#### WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1587,7 +1580,7 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 | **WO2** | **W5 (S-silence on deportation) × O3 (S+V+C healthcare coalition)** | **S should use healthcare coalition as broader S+V+C rehearsal template**; deportation-silence fragments the left only if not compensated by other coordination evidence |
 | **WO3** | **W2 (V–C incompatibility) × O5 (L backbench)** | **Stage-manage SfU voting**: C's amendment goes first; if passed, C-V-MP-S-L vote together on amended law; if failed, they unify on rejection. Avoid simultaneous V-reject + C-amend vote |
 
-### WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities
+#### WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities
 
 | # | Interference | Strategy |
 |:-:|--------------|----------|
@@ -1601,43 +1594,43 @@ The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves
 
 ---
 
-## 👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix
+### 👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix
 
-### 1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Swedish citizens experience immigration policy directly through social services, housing markets, and labour competition. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (up from 8.4% in 2024), citizens in lower-income brackets are receptive to government arguments about limiting new arrivals. However, **S's HD024080** appeals to citizens concerned about privatisation of asylum services — a proxy for welfare-state protection values that resonate with S's base. The fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) speaks directly to household budgets but risks appearing out-of-touch with rural drivers. A **divided citizenry** is the realistic baseline — the opposition's job is to move ~3-5% swing voters, not to flip majority opinion. `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 The governing coalition views these counter-motions as expected partisan opposition. For **Tidö-agreement** parties, the immigration cluster validates their legislative agenda. The sheer number of counter-motions (10/21 on immigration) **confirms the opposition's strategy** and allows the government to campaign on "defending Sweden's security" against a unified left-green-centre bloc. **L is the weak link**: Johan Pehrson's historical rule-of-law sensitivity and the comparative evidence backing C's HD024095 proportionality test create a narrow fault line. The fuel-tax counter-motions create a secondary vulnerability — the government must justify why a climate-ambivalent tax cut is in Sweden's interest. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 This batch represents the most coordinated opposition filing in the current riksmöte. **Socialdemokraterna (S)** under party leader Magdalena Andersson is pursuing a "responsible opposition" strategy — accepting some security reforms while drawing clear lines on welfare-state privatisation (HD024080) and integration investment (HD024079). The **S-silence on deportation** is strategic, not accidental. **Vänsterpartiet (V)** under Nooshi Dadgostar maintains a principled rejection stance on all immigration tightening but risks the universal-rejectionist framing. **Miljöpartiet (MP)** under Janine Alm Ericson leads on climate issues (HD024098) and humanitarian concerns. **Centerpartiet (C)** occupies the critical swing position — accepting some deportation reform but demanding proportionality (HD024095); C is the most politically interesting actor in this wave because its amendment posture is the bridge between opposition messaging and European mainstream practice. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Swedish industry faces contradictory pressures. The fuel-tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) benefits transport-dependent industries — making S's HD024082 unpopular with business. However, the time-limited housing law (prop. 2025/26:215) addresses industry's need for a stable, integratable workforce — V's HD024077 argues the housing limitation reduces integration success, which over time damages labour supply. Consumer-credit reform (HD024088, C) affects the financial services sector directly. **Defence industry** (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Karlskoga ~8k jobs) opposes V's HD024091 and will quietly lobby committee MPs. **Transport-sector unions** may publicly split from S on HD024082 — a risk S must pre-empt. `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 NGOs, church organisations, and refugee-advocacy groups are the strongest supporters of all opposition immigration motions. **Röda Korset**, **Rädda Barnen**, and **Caritas Sverige** have publicly opposed prop. 2025/26:229. Civil-society concerns centre on: (1) private-sector asylum housing (S's HD024080), (2) proportionality in deportation (C's HD024095 / MP's HD024097), and (3) integration investment (S's HD024079). Crime-victim organisations have mixed views on HD024078/84/85 — parent-liability provisions in the crime-victim law create tension with child-protection principles. **Svenska Freds, Diakonia, Amnesty Sverige** form a durable pro-opposition coalition on arms-export motions. `[HIGH]`
 
-### 6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Sweden's immigration policy reforms must remain compatible with the **EU Pact on Migration and Asylum** (entered force 2024, phased implementation 2025–2027). **MP's HD024087** explicitly argues the new reception law risks non-compliance with Reg. 2024/1348 Article 17 material-conditions standard. The arms-export motions (HD024091/96) create international friction — **Sweden's NATO partners** (UK, Germany, US) expect continued defence-industry cooperation post-NATO accession. **EU DG CLIMA** is monitoring Swedish fuel-tax policy under Fit-for-55 and ETS II (entering 2027). **ECtHR** remains a durable post-adoption challenge venue on deportation (prop. 2025/26:235). `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
+#### 7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)
 
 Legal scholars have flagged proportionality concerns in prop. 2025/26:235. **C's HD024095** reflects this — requiring "systematic repeated offenses over time" for deportation aligns with European Court of Human Rights proportionality doctrine and converges with Germany/Netherlands/Denmark/Switzerland statutory practice. **V's total rejection (HD024090)** goes further, arguing the entire law conflicts with ECHR Article 8 (family life). **Lagrådet yttrande** on prop. 2025/26:229 and 2025/26:235 is the single most consequential pending signal — expected Q2 2026. Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) has not published a formal opinion. Administrative Courts (Migrationsdomstolen) will become the main post-adoption venue. `[MEDIUM]`
 
-### 8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)
+#### 8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)
 
 Swedish media (SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD) will cover the coordinated opposition filing as a major political story. Public polling (Novus Q1 2026) shows immigration as the #1 political concern for Swedish voters in 2025–2026. The "four parties against one law" narrative is highly newsworthy. The fuel-tax story plays differently: tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) will frame it as "opposition opposes affordable fuel" — a potential negative story for S. Regional/local media (Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT) will cover the Norrland angle on fuel tax. Young-voter media (TikTok, Instagram) favours MP's climate frame. **Press editorial lines** will be split: DN/SvD lean cautiously pro-government; Aftonbladet/ETC lean pro-opposition; Expressen variable. `[HIGH]`
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart
+### 🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1694,7 +1687,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — LEAD finding + ACH + Red-Team
 - [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md) — LEAD cluster SWOT
@@ -1709,8 +1702,7 @@ flowchart LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1724,7 +1716,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Executive Summary
+### 🎯 Executive Summary
 
 The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or security threat — it constitutes **healthy democratic opposition exercising accountability functions**. The threat dimensions below are **strategic threats to narrative control** (who wins the 2026 campaign), **governance threats to policy coherence** (climate-fiscal contradiction), and **institutional-integrity threats** (disinformation, coordinated inauthentic behaviour around immigration narratives).
 
@@ -1739,7 +1731,7 @@ The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Threat Taxonomy
+### ⚠️ Threat Taxonomy
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1778,9 +1770,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)
+### 🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)
 
-### T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
+#### T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
 
 The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration propositions simultaneously risks **locking in a binary political cleavage** that dominates 2026 election discourse to the exclusion of other policy areas. When all major opposition parties align on a single policy dimension:
 
@@ -1792,7 +1784,7 @@ The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration prop
 
 **Confidence**: 🟧 MEDIUM — electoral dynamics are inherently uncertain; the threat materialises only if the opposition successfully executes its framing strategy.
 
-### T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]
+#### T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]
 
 Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), yet the government's prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes in a supplementary budget — a move that adds **+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year** (Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling) at a time when Sweden is ~20% behind its 2030 trajectory under Klimatlagen 2017:720. S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) both challenge this with different framings but reach the same conclusion: the fuel-tax cut is bad policy.
 
@@ -1802,7 +1794,7 @@ Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), ye
 
 **Confidence**: 🟩 HIGH — the climate-fiscal contradiction is factual and measurable.
 
-### T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
+#### T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]
 
 V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-export ban including follow-up deliveries) signal that a future left-green government would reverse Sweden's post-NATO defence-industrial policy. This creates **policy uncertainty risk** for defence-industry investment decisions. Swedish arms manufacturers (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Systems Karlskoga ~8k jobs) need long-term policy certainty that their export licences will be maintained.
 
@@ -1810,7 +1802,7 @@ V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-e
 
 **Confidence**: 🟧 MEDIUM — V and MP are currently in opposition with no pathway to government without S.
 
-### T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕
+#### T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕
 
 **Context**: Immigration-salience political moments in Sweden 2018, 2022, and now 2026 have correlated with **foreign state-linked amplification networks** (documented by MSB and FOI) and **domestic anonymous influence operations** on social platforms. The April 2026 opposition-motion wave provides a high-value target for:
 
@@ -1835,7 +1827,7 @@ V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-e
 
 ---
 
-## ⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)
+### ⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)
 
 Modelled from **government-perspective**: how might the government/SD dismantle the opposition's four-party narrative?
 
@@ -1901,7 +1893,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)
+### 🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)
 
 Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-communications counter-operation:
 
@@ -1917,7 +1909,7 @@ Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-co
 
 ---
 
-## 🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats
+### 🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats
 
 Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
@@ -1932,7 +1924,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Threat Level Summary
+### 📊 Threat Level Summary
 
 | Threat | Level | Confidence | Timeline | Framework |
 |--------|:-----:|:----------:|----------|-----------|
@@ -1947,7 +1939,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions
+### 🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions
 
 | # | Action | Priority | Addressed-to |
 |:-:|--------|:--------:|--------------|
@@ -1962,7 +1954,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) — Red-Team + ACH ties directly to T1
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md) — R10 (V rejectionist) ↔ T1/A1/C1
@@ -1978,8 +1970,7 @@ Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### arms\-export\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1995,7 +1986,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"
+### 1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"
 
 Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024, ending 200+ years of formal military non-alignment (*alliansfriheten*). Prop. 2025/26:228 modernises the arms-export legal framework (*lag om krigsmateriel* + *lag om vissa produkter som kan användas för dödsstraff eller tortyr*) to align Swedish defence-industrial practice with its new alliance obligations and the post-Ukraine-invasion European armaments market reality.
 
@@ -2011,7 +2002,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence
+### 2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Position | Electoral message |
 |--------|-------|----------------|----------|-------------------|
@@ -2022,7 +2013,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix
+### 3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix
 
 | Dimension | Pre-2024 (non-aligned) | Post-2024 (NATO) | Effect on cluster |
 |-----------|-------------------------|--------------------|-------------------|
@@ -2036,7 +2027,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Cluster SWOT
+### 4. Cluster SWOT
 
 | Dimension | Evidence | Confidence |
 |-----------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -2056,7 +2047,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem
+### 5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2070,7 +2061,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies
+### 6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies
 
 | Jurisdiction | End-user control regime | Human-rights criteria application | Swedish position (post-prop. 2025/26:228) |
 |--------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
@@ -2087,7 +2078,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Risk Matrix
+### 7. Risk Matrix
 
 | R# | Risk | L | I | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:-:|:-:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2100,7 +2091,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Forward Indicators
+### 8. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal | Timeline | Risk |
 |-----------|--------|----------|------|
@@ -2112,7 +2103,7 @@ This matters for three audiences:
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Stakeholder Map
+### 9. Stakeholder Map
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -2173,7 +2164,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Claim | Confidence | Basis |
 |-------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -2185,7 +2176,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 11. Cross-References
+### 11. Cross-References
 
 - **Synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 5 (defence-policy signalling)
 - **Threat analysis**: [`../threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md) T3 (arms export opposition)
@@ -2203,8 +2194,7 @@ graph TD
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ### deportation\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2221,7 +2211,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics
+### 1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics
 
 Proposition 2025/26:235 expands the grounds on which non-citizens can be deported following a criminal conviction. It lowers the severity threshold, extends to categories of offence previously requiring repeat conviction, and shortens the procedural window for appeal. The government presents it as a **flagship gäng-kriminalitet response** — a direct continuation of the 2023–2025 organised-crime legislative arc.
 
@@ -2237,7 +2227,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation
+### 2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Legal position | ECHR alignment | Post-adoption litigation value |
 |--------|-------|----------------|----------------|:--:|--------------------------------|
@@ -2249,7 +2239,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)
+### 3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)
 
 | Dimension | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence |
 |-----------|-------------------|:----------:|
@@ -2269,7 +2259,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem
+### 4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2283,7 +2273,7 @@ The three positions **are testable in court**: if the law passes in its current
 
 ---
 
-## 5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis
+### 5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis
 
 The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article 8 (family life) because deportation for criminal conduct has been repeatedly upheld by the European Court of Human Rights when:
 
@@ -2307,7 +2297,7 @@ The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
+### 6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
 
 | R# | Risk | L | I | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:-:|:-:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2320,7 +2310,7 @@ The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Forward Indicators
+### 7. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal | Timeline | Risk |
 |-----------|--------|----------|------|
@@ -2332,7 +2322,7 @@ The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"
+### 8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2392,7 +2382,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)
+### 9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)
 
 | Uncertainty | Current prior | What would update |
 |-------------|--------------:|-------------------|
@@ -2404,7 +2394,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Cross-References
+### 10. Cross-References
 
 - **Synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 2 (triple-pressure immigration)
 - **Related reception cluster**: [`./reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)
@@ -2424,8 +2414,7 @@ graph LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ### fuel\-tax\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2441,7 +2430,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/ri
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important
+### 1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important
 
 The extra budget (*extra ändringsbudget*) is a mid-cycle supplementary fiscal instrument. Reducing fuel tax via an extra budget is unusual: extra budgets are traditionally reserved for crisis response (pandemic, war, natural disaster). Using one to cut fuel tax signals that the government either (a) believes current fuel prices are a **genuine household-budget crisis** or (b) is delivering an **election-adjacent pocketbook signal** to rural voters within the legal envelope of extra-budget practice.
 
@@ -2456,7 +2445,7 @@ These two frames are **substitutable, not competitive**: a reader who rejects th
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division
+### 2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Primary frame | Secondary frame | Target voter segment |
 |--------|-------|----------------|---------------|-----------------|---------------------|
@@ -2467,7 +2456,7 @@ These two frames are **substitutable, not competitive**: a reader who rejects th
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Cluster SWOT
+### 3. Cluster SWOT
 
 | Dimension | Evidence | Confidence |
 |-----------|----------|:----------:|
@@ -2487,7 +2476,7 @@ These two frames are **substitutable, not competitive**: a reader who rejects th
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification
+### 4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification
 
 Sweden's Climate Act (*Klimatlagen 2017:720*) obligates the government to pursue policies consistent with the long-term goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 and interim targets:
 
@@ -2503,7 +2492,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 5. TOWS Interference
+### 5. TOWS Interference
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2517,7 +2506,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax
+### 6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax
 
 | Jurisdiction | Recent fuel-tax policy (2022–2026) | Climate trajectory | Lesson |
 |--------------|------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
@@ -2533,7 +2522,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
+### 7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)
 
 | R# | Risk | L | I | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:-:|:-:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2545,7 +2534,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Forward Indicators
+### 8. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal | Timeline | Risk |
 |-----------|--------|----------|------|
@@ -2558,7 +2547,7 @@ Naturvårdsverket's annual *Klimatredovisning* for 2025 projected that Sweden wa
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)
+### 9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -2619,7 +2608,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 10. Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Claim | Confidence | Basis |
 |-------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -2631,7 +2620,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 11. Cross-References
+### 11. Cross-References
 
 - **Synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 3
 - **Risk assessment**: [`../risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md) R03
@@ -2649,8 +2638,7 @@ graph LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ### reception\-law\-cluster
-
-_Source: [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2667,7 +2655,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story
+### 1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story
 
 Sweden has not seen **all four major opposition parties** (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions against a single government proposition in a 72-hour window at any point in the current riksmöte. The last comparable four-party convergence on an immigration bill was the 2022 "Migration Package" debates — and even then, motions were staggered across a week and coordinated informally. The April 2026 reception-law cluster is **tighter, more public, and more electorally framed** than that precedent.
 
@@ -2685,7 +2673,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour
+### 2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour
 
 | Motion | Party | Lead signatory | Committee | Rhetorical frame | Core demand |
 |--------|-------|----------------|-----------|------------------|-------------|
@@ -2698,7 +2686,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)
+### 3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)
 
 | Dimension | Evidence (dok_id) | Confidence |
 |-----------|-------------------|:----------:|
@@ -2719,7 +2707,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity
+### 4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity
 
 | Interference | Strategy |
 |-------------|----------|
@@ -2733,7 +2721,7 @@ The four counter-motions each attack a **different weak point** of this law whil
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)
+### 5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)
 
 Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but the **combination** of private-sector operation + time-limited benefits + activation duties is on the restrictive end of EU practice.
 
@@ -2750,7 +2738,7 @@ Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)
+### 6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)
 
 | R# | Risk | L (1-5) | I (1-5) | L×I | Mitigation | Trigger |
 |----|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|------------|---------|
@@ -2762,7 +2750,7 @@ Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Forward Indicators
+### 7. Forward Indicators
 
 | Indicator | Signal to watch | Timeline | Updates which risk |
 |-----------|----------------|----------|--------------------|
@@ -2775,7 +2763,7 @@ Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)
+### 8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -2838,7 +2826,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Confidence Self-Assessment
+### 9. Confidence Self-Assessment
 
 | Claim | Confidence | Basis |
 |-------|:----------:|-------|
@@ -2851,7 +2839,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Cross-References
+### 10. Cross-References
 
 - **Cluster-level synthesis**: [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md) Finding 1
 - **Cross-reference map**: [`../cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md) §Cross-Party Alignment
@@ -2869,8 +2857,7 @@ flowchart LR
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -2883,7 +2870,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer
+### 1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer
 
 SWOT, scenario, and risk artifacts answer *what* and *why*. They do not answer the operational question every editor, civil servant, and foreign desk needs: **which governments are and are not possible after September 2026, and how does the April wave change those numbers?**
 
@@ -2896,7 +2883,7 @@ This artifact provides:
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)
+### 2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)
 
 | Party | 2022 seats | Bloc |
 |-------|:----------:|------|
@@ -2910,9 +2897,9 @@ This artifact provides:
 | **L** — Liberalerna | 16 | Government |
 | **Total** | **349** | |
 
-### Majority threshold: **175 seats**
+#### Majority threshold: **175 seats**
 
-### Current bloc sums
+#### Current bloc sums
 
 | Bloc | Seats | Status |
 |------|:-----:|--------|
@@ -2924,7 +2911,7 @@ This artifact provides:
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)
+### 3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)
 
 Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wave polling effect):
 
@@ -2941,7 +2928,7 @@ Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wa
 
 > **4-percent threshold warning `[HIGH]`**: L at 4.3 % is **within the ±1.5 pp Novus sampling band** of the 4.0 % Riksdag threshold. A single bad polling month pushes L below; if L misses the threshold its seats redistribute (≈ 15 of the 16 flow to M/KD/SD under Sainte-Laguë). This is the **single largest single-party uncertainty** in the 2026 election.
 
-### Pre-wave bloc projection
+#### Pre-wave bloc projection
 
 | Bloc | Projected seats (L in) | Projected seats (L out) |
 |------|:----------------------:|:-----------------------:|
@@ -2953,7 +2940,7 @@ Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wa
 
 ---
 
-## 4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied
+### 4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied
 
 From `historical-baseline.md` §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-year waves is a **−1.3 pp median shift against the government** in the three weeks following a ≥ 10-motion coordinated opposition wave. Applying that prior to the April 2026 polling baseline:
 
@@ -2969,9 +2956,9 @@ From `historical-baseline.md` §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix
+### 5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix
 
-### Notation
+#### Notation
 - ✅ = mathematically possible (≥ 175 seats) AND politically plausible (no ruled-out blocks)
 - 🟧 = mathematically possible but requires political compromises with declared ruled-out actors
 - ❌ = mathematically impossible under April 2026 polling (< 175 seats) OR politically foreclosed
@@ -2986,13 +2973,13 @@ From `historical-baseline.md` §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-
 | 6 | **Tidö + L replaced by C** (M + KD + C + SD) | 62 + 17 + 26 + 65 = **170** | ❌ (5 short) | C has ruled out SD cooperation; would implode C |
 | 7 | **"Grand coalition" S + M** | 119 + 62 = **181** | 🟧 | No mainstream support in either party; historically unprecedented in Sweden |
 
-### Key implication
+#### Key implication
 
 > **Most probable post-2026 government `[HIGH]`**: **Scenario #2 (S + V + MP + C)** is the **only mathematically viable AND politically plausible** configuration under current polling. The April 2026 opposition wave has a specific effect: it **demonstrates operational capacity for exactly this configuration** ahead of post-election negotiations. Whether intentional or not, the wave functions as **coalition-capability signalling** to C's own voters and party apparatus.
 
 ---
 
-## 6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point
+### 6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point
 
 Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government with V — a boundary C has historically policed strongly. The April wave provides **three data points on C's posture**:
 
@@ -3004,7 +2991,7 @@ Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government
 
 > **Interpretation `[HIGH]`**: C's filing pattern is **consistent with conditional post-election cooperation, not fusion**. It signals "we can govern with them on issue-by-issue basis" not "we are a bloc with them". This is exactly the **tolerated minority-government** arithmetic that has characterised Swedish politics since 2014 (Löfven I S-MP with V tolerance; Löfven II S-MP-C-L decemberöverenskommelse; Andersson S minority with V tolerance).
 
-### Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)
+#### Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)
 
 - **Cabinet**: S + MP (two-party cabinet, ~138 seats represented)
 - **Budget confidence**: V + C tolerate with **policy-specific red lines** (V on welfare spending, C on fiscal discipline)
@@ -3014,7 +3001,7 @@ Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026
+### 7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026
 
 Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining five months to the election:
 
@@ -3031,7 +3018,7 @@ Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis
+### 8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis
 
 | Invalidating event | Effect | Re-run trigger |
 |--------------------|--------|----------------|
@@ -3044,7 +3031,7 @@ Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims
+### 9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims
 
 1. **[HIGH]** The Tidö government has already lost its projected majority under April 2026 polling — **before** the wave polling effect is applied.
 2. **[HIGH]** Scenario #2 (S+V+MP+C cooperation) is the only viable post-election government configuration and the April wave is consistent with capability-signalling for it.
@@ -3055,8 +3042,7 @@ Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining
 **Classification**: Public · **Reviewer note**: seat projections use Sainte-Laguë allocation with 4 % threshold; the Novus April mid-month average is the baseline. Update this file when the May 20, 2026 polls are published. The `historical-baseline.md` polling-delta priors feed directly into §4 here.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3070,11 +3056,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties
+### 🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:229 (*En ny mottagandelag*) combines centralised Migrationsverket-run facilities, private-sector operation, time-limited benefits, and activation duties. Four opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024076/80/87/89). S's HD024080 specifically attacks **private-sector operation**. Where does this place Sweden?
 
-### 1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator
+#### 1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator
 
 | Jurisdiction | Reception architecture | Private operation | Time-limiting | Activation duties | RSF 2025 rank | Asylum-grant rate (2024) |
 |--------------|------------------------|:-----------------:|:-------------:|:-----------------:|:-------------:|:------------------------:|
@@ -3089,7 +3075,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 > **Comparative insight `[HIGH]`**: The **private-operation provision** is the **distinctive Swedish outlier** relative to Nordic peers. Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Netherlands all operate state-centred reception without private sub-contracting of housing. Germany permits private operation **under Länder-level oversight** — this is the closest parallel, but it exists because of German federalism, not by design. Austria briefly experimented with BBU-GmbH (state-owned limited company) and private sub-contracting; the experiment generated repeated public scandals over housing conditions (2018–2021) and Austria has since rolled back private contracts. **S's HD024080 anti-privatisation frame is therefore aligned with comparative best practice, not ideological outlier**.
 
-### 1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility
+#### 1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility
 
 The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Conditions) sets **minimum standards** for reception, including:
 
@@ -3102,11 +3088,11 @@ The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Condit
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality
+### 🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:235 expands deportation triggers for non-citizens convicted of crimes. Three opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024090/95/97). C's HD024095 demands **statutory proportionality testing** ("systematic repeated offences over time"). Does this align with European practice?
 
-### 2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator
+#### 2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator
 
 | Jurisdiction | Proportionality test | Statutory or administrative? | ECHR Art. 8 case-law posture | ECtHR adverse judgments (2015–2025) |
 |--------------|---------------------|:---:|------------------------------|:---:|
@@ -3122,7 +3108,7 @@ The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Condit
 
 > **Comparative insight `[HIGH]`**: The **statutory proportionality test is the modal European approach**. Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, UK, and Belgium all codify deportation-proportionality criteria in legislation, not administrative guidance. **C's HD024095 therefore converges with the European statutory mainstream** — framing it as a leftist or liberal outlier would be factually incorrect. It is a rule-of-law convergence proposal.
 
-### 2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation
+#### 2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation
 
 Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower adverse ECtHR judgment counts** (mean 1.67) than administrative-test jurisdictions (Sweden, Norway: mean 3.5). The correlation is not perfectly causal — ECtHR caseload also depends on litigation capacity — but **statutory specificity does correlate with fewer successful Strasbourg challenges**, which is in the government's own interest.
 
@@ -3130,11 +3116,11 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories
+### 🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes via an *extra ändringsbudget*. S (HD024082) attacks fiscal framing; MP (HD024098) attacks climate coherence. How does this compare to peer climate-committed democracies 2022–2026?
 
-### 3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy
+#### 3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy
 
 | Jurisdiction | 2022–2026 fuel-tax policy | Climate trajectory (per national climate-law) | Electoral outcome of cut |
 |--------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
@@ -3148,7 +3134,7 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 > **Comparative insight `[HIGH]`**: Of six peer jurisdictions, **only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt)** is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut. Germany **did not extend it**, and the measure is now cited in German policy discourse as an unproductive use of fiscal space that did not buy political goodwill. The Swedish government is therefore **betting against European comparative experience**.
 
-### 3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators
+#### 3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators
 
 | Jurisdiction | Climate-law mechanism | Parliamentary oversight | Judicial review potential |
 |--------------|-----------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|
@@ -3162,11 +3148,11 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls
+### 🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls
 
 > **Context**: prop. 2025/26:228 modernises Sweden's arms-export framework post-NATO accession. V (HD024091) rejects totally; MP (HD024096) demands end-user review. Where does this place Sweden?
 
-### 4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator
+#### 4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator
 
 | Jurisdiction | End-user control regime | Criterion-2 (HR) application | Post-delivery monitoring | Public disclosure |
 |--------------|--------------------------|------------------------------|:------------------------:|------------------:|
@@ -3186,7 +3172,7 @@ Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have **lower ad
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions
+### 🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -3214,7 +3200,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom
+### 🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom
 
 | Finding | Reportable statement | Confidence |
 |---------|---------------------|:----------:|
@@ -3226,7 +3212,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes
+### 🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes
 
 1. **Most-similar design** applied for Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI) — small open-economy parliamentary democracies with welfare states.
 2. **Most-different design** applied for UK, France, Germany — testing whether policy effects replicate across structurally different systems.
@@ -3238,7 +3224,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 📎 Cross-References
+### 📎 Cross-References
 
 - `reception-law-cluster-analysis.md` §5 (cluster-specific comparison)
 - `deportation-cluster-analysis.md` §5 (ECHR alignment)
@@ -3252,15 +3238,14 @@ quadrantChart
 **Classification**: Public · **Next Review**: 2026-04-27
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-motions workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-20 13:02 UTC | **Data Depth**: SUMMARY (MCP get_motioner)
 
 ---
 
-## 🗂️ Document Classification Overview
+### 🗂️ Document Classification Overview
 
 | # | Dok_id | Motion Nr | Title (EN) | Party | Committee | Domain | Sensitivity | Urgency |
 |---|--------|-----------|------------|-------|-----------|--------|-------------|---------|
@@ -3288,7 +3273,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Classification by Policy Domain
+### 📊 Classification by Policy Domain
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
@@ -3302,7 +3287,7 @@ pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Committee Distribution
+### 🎯 Committee Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -3323,7 +3308,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix
+### 🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix
 
 | Party | SfU | AU | CU | SoU | FiU | UU | Total |
 |-------|-----|----|----|-----|-----|----|-------|
@@ -3335,32 +3320,31 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📌 Key Classification Findings
+### 📌 Key Classification Findings
 
-### 1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
+#### 1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
 All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed motions on **three simultaneous immigration-related propositions** — a coordinated response not seen since the 2022 Migration Package debates. This signals a deliberate opposition strategy to frame immigration as the central political battleground before the September 2026 election.
 
-### 2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
+#### 2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)
 Both S (center-left) and MP (Green) oppose the government's fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. This unusual alignment of economic-left and climate-green parties creates a unified messaging opportunity: the government is both economically irresponsible (S) and climate-damaging (MP).
 
-### 3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
+#### 3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
 V and MP both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation, continuing a consistent pattern of opposing Sweden's post-2022 defense-industrial pivot. With NATO membership now settled, this opposition has limited practical effect but strong electoral signaling value for their core voters.
 
-### 4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
+#### 4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)
 The unusual alignment of S, V, and C against prop. 2025/26:216 (municipal healthcare medical competence) reflects a substantive policy disagreement about regulatory design, not just partisan positioning.
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-20 | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26 | **Analyst**: news-motions workflow
 **Analysis Timestamp**: 2026-04-20 13:08 UTC
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network
+### 🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network
 
-### Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference
+#### Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference
 
 | Proposition | Title | Counter-Motions | Filing Parties | Committee |
 |-------------|-------|-----------------|----------------|-----------|
@@ -3377,7 +3361,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network
+### 🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -3414,9 +3398,9 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Party Coordination Analysis
+### 📊 Party Coordination Analysis
 
-### Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)
+#### Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -3448,9 +3432,9 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Previous Period Cross-References
+### 🔗 Previous Period Cross-References
 
-### Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)
+#### Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)
 
 The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previous run:
 
@@ -3460,7 +3444,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 | HD024097 (MP, deportation) | HD024090 (V, deportation) | Parallel rejection strategies |
 | HD024093 (C, cybersecurity) | HD024095 (C, deportation) | C's consistent "more analysis needed" framing |
 
-### Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte
+#### Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte
 
 - The immigration motions continue opposition strategy from 2024/25 riksmöte when similar restrictions were resisted
 - V's complete rejection pattern (HD024090, HD024091) mirrors V's consistent "no" to all security-related legislation since 2022
@@ -3468,7 +3452,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context
+### 📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context
 
 | Motion Cluster | Economic Context Link | Data Point |
 |---------------|----------------------|------------|
@@ -3479,7 +3463,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections
+### 🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections
 
 1. **SfU Hearings** (May 2026): All immigration motions will be heard in Social Affairs Committee — expect testimony from Röda Korset, UNHCR Sweden
 2. **FiU Budget Vote** (May 2026): Fuel tax extra budget — HD024082/98 will be voted down but provide campaign material
@@ -3487,8 +3471,7 @@ The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previo
 4. **CIA Platform connection**: Voting records for these motions will appear at https://hack23.github.io/cia/ when chamber votes occur (June 2026)
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3500,7 +3483,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Rule Compliance Matrix
+### 1. Rule Compliance Matrix
 
 Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 
@@ -3521,7 +3504,7 @@ Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File
+### 2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File
 
 | File | Tier | Rationale |
 |------|:----:|-----------|
@@ -3544,9 +3527,9 @@ Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)
+### 3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)
 
-### Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)
+#### Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)
 - Baseline artifacts (classification, significance, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder, cross-ref, synthesis)
 - Single-frame analysis on each cluster
 - No comparative or scenario-tree content
@@ -3554,8 +3537,7 @@ Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.
 - Synthesis at ~100 lines; SWOT at ~126 lines; risk at ~109 lines
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-21 07:16 UTC
 **Data Sources**: 
@@ -3570,7 +3552,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 > `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` and using templates
 > from `analysis/templates/`.
 
-## Document Counts by Type
+### Document Counts by Type
 
 - **propositions**: 0 documents
 - **motions**: 0 documents
@@ -3580,13 +3562,12 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **questions**: 0 documents
 - **interpellations**: 0 documents
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 
 All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 
 ## Historical Baseline
-
-_Source: [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-baseline.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md -->
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -3599,7 +3580,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters
+### 1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters
 
 Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and hard to falsify without a baseline. This artifact answers three calibration questions that every other artifact in this dossier depends on:
 
@@ -3609,7 +3590,7 @@ Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and har
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026
+### 2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026
 
 The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where **≥ 3 opposition parties filed ≥ 10 counter-motions against government propositions within a ≤ 14-day window on a common policy cluster**. Inclusion criteria are deliberately strict so that the 2026 event is judged against its real peers, not noise.
 
@@ -3626,7 +3607,7 @@ The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where **≥ 3 opposition p
 | 9 | 2024-10 | Migration — return-centres bill | S, V, MP, C | 18 | Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support) | ❌ |
 | 🔶 10 | **2026-04** | **Reception + Deportation + Housing + Fuel Tax + Arms + Consumer + Healthcare** | **S, V, MP, C** | **21** | **Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)** | **✅ Sept. 2026** |
 
-### Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim
+#### Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim
 
 Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period framing:
 
@@ -3641,7 +3622,7 @@ Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period fra
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves
+### 3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves
 
 Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates discipline this. For each comparable election-year wave (rows 1, 4, 7) the table below records the wave's quantitative features and the electoral outcome six months later.
 
@@ -3652,7 +3633,7 @@ Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates disc
 | 2022-03 | 11 | V+MP+C | −1.1 pp | +1.7 pp | ✅ |
 | **2026 median prior** | **≈ 10–11** | **≥3** | **−1.3 pp (median)** | **+1.2 pp (median)** | **3 / 3 = 100 % — but n = 3** |
 
-### Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling
+#### Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling
 
 The 2026 wave is **larger** (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two reasonable priors follow:
 
@@ -3663,7 +3644,7 @@ The 2026 wave is **larger** (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave
+### 4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave
 
 Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the **most similar** prior event (same four parties, same government, same migration theme, same parliamentary term), it is the strongest comparator. The deltas below isolate what is genuinely new in 2026.
 
@@ -3682,9 +3663,9 @@ Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the **most similar** prior event
 
 ---
 
-## 5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says
+### 5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says
 
-### 5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)
+#### 5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -3696,7 +3677,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 > **Trend observation `[HIGH]`**: Opposition filing volume has risen ~90% from 2014/15 to 2024/25, with the sharpest acceleration from 2022/23 onward (under the current government). The 2025/26 YTD count of 238 (≈ 60% of the riksmöte elapsed) projects to **≈ 397 by end-of-term if the pace holds** — which would be a new record.
 
-### 5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)
+#### 5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)
 
 Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same proposition within ≤ 48 hours** of each other:
 
@@ -3712,7 +3693,7 @@ Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same
 
 ---
 
-## 6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims
+### 6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims
 
 | Dossier claim | Baseline verdict | Suggested edit |
 |---------------|:----------------:|----------------|
@@ -3726,7 +3707,7 @@ Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Data-Quality Notes
+### 7. Data-Quality Notes
 
 - **Coverage**: Riksdagen Öppna Data filing index is complete back to the 2002/03 riksmöte. The 2014–2026 window is chosen because the current five-party bloc structure stabilised post-2014.
 - **Edge cases**: Rows 2 (2015-11) and 6 (2021-06) involve parties in atypical positions (MP partially opposing own government; V at break point with Löfven II). Treated as opposition-side filings.
@@ -3736,3 +3717,27 @@ Counting the share of opposition motions where **≥ 3 parties file on the same
 ---
 
 **Classification**: Public · **Confidence on headline baseline claims**: 🟩 HIGH · **Reviewer**: please flag any inter-period comparability concerns (committee reorganisations, rule changes) for the next revision.
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md)
+- [`historical-baseline.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/article.md
index 261620ce1d..38b0ed7389 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-21
 subfolder: realtime-1353
 slug: 2026-04-21-realtime-1353
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.895Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.694Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -22,10 +22,9 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
+### BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
 
 Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) today cutting fuel taxes and providing electricity/gas price support — directly benefiting ~9M citizens. Simultaneously, the government launched a new wind power revenue-sharing law. Both measures are designed to address household affordability while maintaining a "green transition" narrative ahead of the September 2026 elections.
 
@@ -33,7 +32,7 @@ Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) to
 
 ---
 
-## 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Editorial decision**: This is today's lead story — publish EN + SV breaking articles within 2 hours
 2. **Monitoring decision**: Track FiU48 chamber vote outcome (expected 2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24)
@@ -41,7 +40,7 @@ Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) to
 
 ---
 
-## 60-Second Read (8 Bullets)
+### 60-Second Read (8 Bullets)
 
 - 🔴 **FiU48 debate today**: Finance Committee approved extra budget amendment reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support; chamber vote expected within 48 hours
 - 🌬️ **Wind power law announced**: New legislation requires wind turbine operators to share revenues with residents within 9 turbine-heights — third step of Britz's vindkraftspaket
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) to
 
 ---
 
-## Named Actors with dok_id Citations
+### Named Actors with dok_id Citations
 
 | Actor | Role | Significance | dok_id |
 |-------|------|-------------|--------|
@@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) to
 
 ---
 
-## 14-Day Forward Vote Calendar
+### 14-Day Forward Vote Calendar
 
 | Date (approx.) | Event | Significance |
 |----------------|-------|-------------|
@@ -79,7 +78,7 @@ Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) to
 
 ---
 
-## Top-5 Risks
+### Top-5 Risks
 
 1. **Fuel tax cut undermines climate targets** (R01, HIGH probability/HIGH impact)
 2. **FiU48 chamber vote — L dissent possible** (R02, LOW probability/HIGH impact)
@@ -89,7 +88,7 @@ Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) to
 
 ---
 
-## Analyst Confidence Meter
+### Analyst Confidence Meter
 
 ```
 LOW ──────────────────── HIGH
@@ -101,10 +100,9 @@ LOW ──────────────────── HIGH
 **Uncertainty factors**: FiU48 exact vote timeline; KU hearing outcomes; EU Commission response timing.
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md)_
-
-## Executive Summary
+### Executive Summary
 
 Today's parliamentary intelligence reveals **two high-significance fiscal and energy policy developments** in Stockholm: the Riksdag Finance Committee's approval of an extra budget amendment (FiU48) reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support, and the government's launch of a new wind power revenue-sharing law giving residents near turbines legal right to compensation. Together these represent Sweden's largest single-day energy and household economics policy event of the 2025/26 Riksdag session.
 
@@ -114,9 +112,9 @@ Today's parliamentary intelligence reveals **two high-significance fiscal and en
 
 ---
 
-## Key Findings
+### Key Findings
 
-### Finding 1: Extra Budget FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support (HIGH)
+#### Finding 1: Extra Budget FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support (HIGH)
 **dok_id**: HD01FiU48  
 **Organ**: Finansutskottet (FiU)  
 **Status**: Committee approved ("Debatt om förslag" 2026-04-21) — chamber vote expected today
@@ -127,7 +125,7 @@ The Finance Committee (FiU) approved Betänkande 2025/26:FiU48 covering the gove
 
 The committee debate is scheduled for 2026-04-21. A chamber vote is expected to follow within 1-3 days. The Tidöalliansen (M+SD+KD+L) bloc holds 175/349 seats, providing a narrow majority for passage.
 
-### Finding 2: Wind Power Revenue-Sharing Law (HIGH)
+#### Finding 2: Wind Power Revenue-Sharing Law (HIGH)
 **Source**: Regering press release, Johan Britz (acting Climate Minister, L)  
 **Status**: Third step of vindkraftspaket — law announced 2026-04-20
 
@@ -138,7 +136,7 @@ Acting Climate and Environment Minister Johan Britz announced a new law requirin
 
 The policy aims to shift local opposition to wind farms (NIMBY) into stakeholder support (YIMBY) — a critical political challenge for Sweden's electricity expansion plans.
 
-### Finding 3: KU Constitutional Hearings — Svantesson + Wallström (HIGH governance)
+#### Finding 3: KU Constitutional Hearings — Svantesson + Wallström (HIGH governance)
 **dok_ids**: HDC220260421ou1, HDC220260421ou2  
 **Organ**: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)  
 **Status**: Open hearings 2026-04-21 (11:00 Svantesson, 12:00 Wallström)
@@ -149,7 +147,7 @@ The Constitutional Committee held two open public hearings:
 
 These hearings are part of KU's annual constitutional review (granskning) — Sweden's primary mechanism for holding ministers accountable to the Riksdag and constitution.
 
-### Finding 4: Today's Interpellations (MEDIUM)
+#### Finding 4: Today's Interpellations (MEDIUM)
 Three new interpellations filed 2026-04-21:
 - **HD10441**: Elsa Widding → Justice Minister Strömmer on legal system accountability (jurist review of jurists)
 - **HD10440**: Johanna Haraldsson (S) → Labor Minister Britz on occupational physician training shortage
@@ -157,7 +155,7 @@ Three new interpellations filed 2026-04-21:
 
 ---
 
-## Political Intelligence Assessment
+### Political Intelligence Assessment
 
 **Coalition positioning**: Tidöalliansen pushing two simultaneous "affordability" messages — fuel tax relief AND energy price support — in an apparent bid to pre-empt opposition attacks on high living costs ahead of the 2026 election cycle. The wind power law addition signals the coalition can also address green transition while prioritizing affordability.
 
@@ -167,7 +165,7 @@ Three new interpellations filed 2026-04-21:
 
 ---
 
-## Event Coverage Status
+### Event Coverage Status
 
 | dok_id | Title (abbreviated) | Previous run | This run |
 |--------|---------------------|--------------|---------|
@@ -178,12 +176,11 @@ Three new interpellations filed 2026-04-21:
 | HD10441/40/42 | Interpellationer (3 new) | Not covered | ✅ New coverage |
 
 ## Significance Scoring
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md -->
 
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md)_
+### DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix
 
-## DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix
-
-### HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el- och gasprisstöd
+#### HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el- och gasprisstöd
 **DIW Score: 9.0 / 10** *(Lead Story)*
 
 | Factor | Points | Justification |
@@ -202,7 +199,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### Vindkraft Intäktsdelning — Ny lag om ersättning till närboende
+#### Vindkraft Intäktsdelning — Ny lag om ersättning till närboende
 **DIW Score: 8.0 / 10** *(Second Lead)*
 
 | Factor | Points | Justification |
@@ -217,7 +214,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### KU-utfrågning: Svantesson + Wallström — Konstitutionsutskottet
+#### KU-utfrågning: Svantesson + Wallström — Konstitutionsutskottet
 **DIW Score: 7.5 / 10** *(Third Lead)*
 
 | Factor | Points | Justification |
@@ -230,7 +227,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### HD10442 — Interpellation: Ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm (Markus Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M)
+#### HD10442 — Interpellation: Ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm (Markus Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M)
 **DIW Score: 5.5 / 10** *(MEDIUM)*
 
 | Factor | Points | Justification |
@@ -243,7 +240,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### HD10440 — Interpellation: Företagsläkare (Johanna Haraldsson/S → Johan Britz/L)
+#### HD10440 — Interpellation: Företagsläkare (Johanna Haraldsson/S → Johan Britz/L)
 **DIW Score: 4.5 / 10** *(MEDIUM)*
 
 | Factor | Points | Justification |
@@ -256,17 +253,17 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-### HD10441 — Interpellation: Rättssäkerheten (Elsa Widding → Gunnar Strömmer/M)
+#### HD10441 — Interpellation: Rättssäkerheten (Elsa Widding → Gunnar Strömmer/M)
 **DIW Score: 4.0 / 10** *(MEDIUM)*
 
 ---
 
-### HD01TU16 — Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning (TU betänkande)
+#### HD01TU16 — Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning (TU betänkande)
 **DIW Score: 3.0 / 10** *(LOW — skip)*
 
 ---
 
-## Lead-Story Designation
+### Lead-Story Designation
 
 🏆 **Primary Lead**: HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support
 - All article titles, H1 headings, and meta descriptions MUST reference FiU48 and its consumer impact
@@ -276,12 +273,11 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 🥉 **Tertiary**: KU Constitutional Committee open hearings (Svantesson + Wallström)
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
-
-## HD01FiU48 Extra Budget + Vindkraft Law — 8 Stakeholder Groups
+### HD01FiU48 Extra Budget + Vindkraft Law — 8 Stakeholder Groups
 
-### 1. Citizens (10M Swedish residents)
+#### 1. Citizens (10M Swedish residents)
 
 **Impact**: HIGH — Direct financial relief from fuel tax cut + energy price support  
 **Perspective**: Near-universal short-term benefit; division between urban (public transport) and rural (car-dependent) communities  
@@ -289,7 +285,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Losers**: Climate-conscious citizens concerned about fossil incentives; urban residents who don't own cars get less benefit  
 **Evidence**: Sweden's fuel costs among Europe's highest (tax component ~50%); energy support addresses post-2022 elevated prices
 
-### 2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)
+#### 2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)
 
 **Impact**: HIGH — This is their flagship 2026 relief package  
 **Perspective**: Coalition frames FiU48 as essential affordability measure; vindkraft law as green credentials  
@@ -299,7 +295,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Evidence**: FiU48 approval by FiU committee; Britz's three-step vindkraftspaket announcement  
 **dok_ids**: HD01FiU48, gov/vindkraft
 
-### 3. Opposition Bloc (primarily S, but also V, MP, C on specific issues)
+#### 3. Opposition Bloc (primarily S, but also V, MP, C on specific issues)
 
 **Impact**: HIGH — Forced into difficult political position  
 **Perspective**: S faces contradictory pressures: oppose fuel tax cuts (climate) or support them (affordability)?  
@@ -312,7 +308,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Evidence**: Interpellation pattern (Kallifatides on healthcare, Haraldsson on occupational physicians) suggests S prefers tactical probing on social issues rather than direct FiU48 confrontation  
 **dok_ids**: HD10442, HD10440
 
-### 4. Business & Industry
+#### 4. Business & Industry
 
 **Impact**: MEDIUM-HIGH — Fuel cost relief for logistics, agriculture, fishing  
 **Perspective**: Welcomed by transport sector (last-mile logistics, trucking), agriculture (diesel for farm equipment), fishing  
@@ -321,7 +317,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Wind power industry**: New revenue-sharing law adds compliance cost but increases social license → net positive for project approvals  
 **Evidence**: Swedish Transport Agency data shows commercial transport comprises ~35% of fuel consumption; farm diesel tax relief recurring demand from LRF
 
-### 5. Civil Society (environmental NGOs, social welfare organizations)
+#### 5. Civil Society (environmental NGOs, social welfare organizations)
 
 **Impact**: HIGH (split)  
 **Environmental NGOs** (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF Sverige, Greenpeace): STRONGLY NEGATIVE on fuel tax cut — conflicts with Sweden's climate commitments  
@@ -329,7 +325,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Vindkraft opposition groups** (local NIMBY organizations): CAUTIOUSLY POSITIVE on revenue sharing — may reduce opposition but may be insufficient  
 **Evidence**: Naturskyddsföreningen has previously criticized any fossil fuel subsidy; energy poverty affected approximately 180,000 Swedish households in 2023 (Energimyndigheten data)
 
-### 6. International / EU
+#### 6. International / EU
 
 **Impact**: MEDIUM  
 **EU Commission**: Will scrutinize fuel tax reduction under Green Deal; Sweden has one of EU's stronger climate reputations → any backsliding noted  
@@ -337,7 +333,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Ukraine/Baltic dimension**: Sweden's energy security and renewable buildout has NATO/Baltic Sea defense implications — vindkraft expansion aligns with energy independence goals  
 **Evidence**: EU State Aid rules require notification for energy support schemes; Nordic comparisons relevant (DK property inlösen model)
 
-### 7. Judiciary / Constitutional
+#### 7. Judiciary / Constitutional
 
 **Impact**: MEDIUM  
 **Constitutional dimension**: KU hearings today (Svantesson + Wallström) test procedural compliance and ministerial accountability  
@@ -345,7 +341,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Wind power law**: New intäktsdelning law will inevitably face interpretation disputes in courts about compensation calculation methodology  
 **Evidence**: KU hearings 2026-04-21; HD10441; government's new vindkraft law
 
-### 8. Media / Public Opinion
+#### 8. Media / Public Opinion
 
 **Impact**: HIGH — both stories are media-friendly (consumer relief + green technology)  
 **Framing contests**:
@@ -357,12 +353,11 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 **Media attention expected**: SR Ekot, SVT Agenda, DN, SvD will cover FiU48 debate day
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md)_
+### Base Scenarios (30-day and 90-day horizon)
 
-## Base Scenarios (30-day and 90-day horizon)
-
-### Scenario A: "Fuel Tax Relief + Green Transition Succeed" (BASE CASE)
+#### Scenario A: "Fuel Tax Relief + Green Transition Succeed" (BASE CASE)
 **Probability**: 50% (30-day) | 40% (90-day)
 
 **Description**: FiU48 passes Riksdag chamber with M+SD+KD+L bloc intact (175 votes). Fuel tax reduction takes effect, providing measurable household relief. Vindkraft revenue-sharing law passes committee process smoothly. EU Commission issues monitoring note but no formal objection. Coalition's combined "affordability + green" narrative gains political traction.
@@ -379,7 +374,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Policy impact (if achieved)**: ~SEK 3-4B fiscal cost of fuel tax cut; ~SEK 5-8B for energy support; potentially +500-800 MW new wind power capacity approved within 12 months
 
-### Scenario B: "Partial Success — FiU48 Passes but Complications Emerge" (LIKELY)
+#### Scenario B: "Partial Success — FiU48 Passes but Complications Emerge" (LIKELY)
 **Probability**: 35% (30-day) | 45% (90-day)
 
 **Description**: FiU48 passes but with internal L party tension. EU Commission formally queries Sweden under fossil subsidy monitoring framework. Wind power law faces initial legal challenge from developer association. KU G16 hearing results in formal committee observation (not full criticism) of Svantesson's fiscal process documentation.
@@ -396,7 +391,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Political impact**: Coalition appears competent but under pressure; opposition S claims "we said so" on climate tensions
 
-### Scenario C: "Coalition Stress — FiU48 Amended or Climate Crisis" (BEARISH)
+#### Scenario C: "Coalition Stress — FiU48 Amended or Climate Crisis" (BEARISH)
 **Probability**: 15% (30-day) | 15% (90-day)
 
 **Description**: L party unexpectedly votes against or demands significant amendments to FiU48's fuel tax component. EU Commission opens formal State Aid investigation. A major climate event (extreme weather, IPCC report) shifts public opinion sharply against fossil fuel subsidies. Coalition's affordability narrative collapses.
@@ -410,17 +405,17 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Wildcards
+### Wildcards
 
-### Wildcard 1: Energy Price Collapse Before Vote (PROBABILITY: 10%)
+#### Wildcard 1: Energy Price Collapse Before Vote (PROBABILITY: 10%)
 If European energy prices drop sharply before the FiU48 chamber vote, the political urgency for el- och gasprisstöd evaporates. The bill could appear opportunistic or unnecessary, giving opposition S the "we said so" moment. Impact: MEDIUM-HIGH.
 
-### Wildcard 2: Major Wind Power Accident or Turbine Fire (PROBABILITY: 5%)
+#### Wildcard 2: Major Wind Power Accident or Turbine Fire (PROBABILITY: 5%)
 A high-profile wind turbine fire or structural failure, particularly in Sweden or adjacent Nordic country, could shift public opinion against vindkraft revenue sharing and potentially delay the entire package. Denmark experienced turbine fires in 2023-2024 that briefly slowed new approvals. Impact: MEDIUM.
 
 ---
 
-## ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid
+### ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid
 
 **Hypothesis A**: FiU48 is primarily an affordability measure with electoral intent  
 **Hypothesis B**: FiU48 is primarily a fiscal stabilization measure responding to genuine economic stress  
@@ -439,7 +434,7 @@ A high-profile wind turbine fire or structural failure, particularly in Sweden o
 
 ---
 
-## Monitoring-Trigger Calendar
+### Monitoring-Trigger Calendar
 
 | Date | Event | Scenario Implication |
 |------|-------|---------------------|
@@ -450,10 +445,9 @@ A high-profile wind turbine fire or structural failure, particularly in Sweden o
 | 2026-06-01 | First vindkraft revenue-sharing implementation cases | A (smooth) or B (legal challenge) |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md -->
 
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md)_
-
-## Risk Matrix
+### Risk Matrix
 
 | Risk ID | Risk | Probability | Impact | DIW Score | Mitigation |
 |---------|------|-------------|--------|-----------|------------|
@@ -466,36 +460,36 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R07 | Interpellation on ätstörningsvård (HD10442) escalates to formal VU | LOW (0.1) | HIGH | 5.5 | Opposition pattern: interpellation → motion → potential VU if no response |
 | R08 | Wallström KU hearing triggers fresh S-opposition narrative on foreign policy | MEDIUM (0.3) | MEDIUM | 4.5 | Historical review of pre-2022 FP decisions — S leadership may seek to manage narrative |
 
-## Top-5 Risks for Immediate Monitoring
+### Top-5 Risks for Immediate Monitoring
 
-### R01 — Fossil Lock-in from Fuel Tax Cut *(CRITICAL)*
+#### R01 — Fossil Lock-in from Fuel Tax Cut *(CRITICAL)*
 **Probability**: 70% of measurable impact within 12 months  
 **Evidence**: Sweden's transport emissions fell 19% 2020-2024 partly due to high fuel prices; tax cut reverses price signal  
 **Affected parties**: S, MP, C (all have climate commitments); EU Commission  
 **Monitoring trigger**: Any indication that 2026 transport emission statistics diverge from projections
 
-### R02 — Chamber Vote on FiU48 Fails *(LOW but HIGH IMPACT)*
+#### R02 — Chamber Vote on FiU48 Fails *(LOW but HIGH IMPACT)*
 **Probability**: 15%  
 **Scenario**: If Liberals (L) — historically pro-green tax — vote against, coalition loses majority (175 − 16 L seats = 159, below 175 threshold)  
 **Monitoring trigger**: L party statements before chamber vote; any L dissenters emerging
 
-### R03 — EU Green Deal Conflict *(MEDIUM)*
+#### R03 — EU Green Deal Conflict *(MEDIUM)*
 **Probability**: 40%  
 **Context**: European Commission monitoring member-state fossil subsidies; Sweden could face State Aid review  
 **Evidence**: EU Regulation 2024/1679 requires member states to report fossil fuel subsidies  
 **Monitoring trigger**: EC press releases; Swedish EU mission statements
 
-### R05 — KU Hearing Governance Findings *(LOW probability, HIGH democratic impact)*
+#### R05 — KU Hearing Governance Findings *(LOW probability, HIGH democratic impact)*
 **Probability**: 20%  
 **Context**: KU G16 examines Svantesson on fiscal framework processes; KU G34 examines Wallström on foreign policy decisions during S government  
 **Monitoring trigger**: KU draft report language; any dissenting KU committee member statements
 
-### R04 — Wind Power Law Legal Challenge *(MEDIUM)*
+#### R04 — Wind Power Law Legal Challenge *(MEDIUM)*
 **Probability**: 35%  
 **Context**: Developers may argue compensation calculation method violates property law; residents may argue amount too low  
 **Monitoring trigger**: Legal professional organizations' statements; first court filings post-implementation
 
-## Risk Trend (Compared to Previous Realtime Runs)
+### Risk Trend (Compared to Previous Realtime Runs)
 
 | Risk Area | Previous (1130/1240) | Current (1353) | Trend |
 |-----------|---------------------|----------------|-------|
@@ -506,10 +500,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | Climate targets | MEDIUM | HIGH (fuel tax cut) | ↑ |
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md)_
-
-## Context Table
+### Context Table
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -520,7 +513,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Analyst Confidence | HIGH (live MCP data, committee report available) |
 | Political Context | Tidöalliansen (M+SD+KD+L) governing coalition, 2022-2026 mandate |
 
-## SWOT Analysis — Extra Budget FiU48 + Energy Policy
+### SWOT Analysis — Extra Budget FiU48 + Energy Policy
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -541,7 +534,7 @@ quadrantChart
     Fossil fuel lock-in risk: [0.80, 0.72]
 ```
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 | Strength | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|----------|--------|------------|
@@ -551,7 +544,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | FiU approval signals coalition discipline | Finance Committee (FiU) approving extra budget shows M+SD+KD+L bloc cohesion | HD01FiU48 | MEDIUM |
 | Cross-party fiscal pragmatism | Extra budget outside main annual budget cycle demonstrates crisis-response capability | HD01FiU48 | MEDIUM |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 | Weakness | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |----------|----------|--------|------------|
@@ -560,7 +553,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | Vindkraft compensation may be insufficient | Residents closest to turbines may still oppose; law-mandated minimum may not match market | gov/vindkraft | MEDIUM |
 | Extra budget process signals fiscal improvisation | Multiple extra changes budgets in one year suggests reactive rather than strategic fiscal planning | HD01FiU48 | MEDIUM |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 | Opportunity | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |-------------|----------|--------|------------|
@@ -570,7 +563,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | Reframing wind power from NIMBY to YIMBY | Revenue-sharing turns opponents into stakeholders → paradigm shift in local acceptance | gov/vindkraft | MEDIUM |
 | KU hearings strengthen democratic accountability | Svantesson + Wallström hearings reinforce institutional norms of ministerial accountability | KU hearings | MEDIUM |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 | Threat | Evidence | dok_id | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|--------|------------|
@@ -580,7 +573,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | Opposition S may counter with alternative energy support | S-led opposition could propose more targeted support → political embarrassment | HD01FiU48 | MEDIUM |
 | KU scrutiny may surface governance failures | Wallström (S) investigation could reveal policy failures damaging coalition's credibility | KU hearings | LOW |
 
-## Cross-Cutting SWOT Dynamics
+### Cross-Cutting SWOT Dynamics
 
 **Strength–Threat Tension**: The fuel tax cut provides genuine short-term consumer relief (S) but threatens long-term climate targets (T). This tension defines the political debate: coalition argues affordability NOW vs. opposition argues sustainability LATER.
 
@@ -589,10 +582,9 @@ quadrantChart
 **Scenario Dependency**: If energy prices remain elevated through 2026, el- och gasprisstöd becomes politically essential and FiU48 looks prescient. If energy prices drop, the extra budget looks wasteful.
 
 ## Threat Analysis
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md)_
-
-## Threat Level Assessment
+### Threat Level Assessment
 
 **Overall Threat Level**: MEDIUM-HIGH  
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM (parliamentary session data, no classified sources)  
@@ -600,9 +592,9 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Active Threats
+### Active Threats
 
-### T01 — Climate Policy Integrity Threat (SEVERITY: HIGH)
+#### T01 — Climate Policy Integrity Threat (SEVERITY: HIGH)
 **Category**: Policy coherence threat  
 **Actors**: Riksdag coalition (M+SD+KD+L), EU Commission  
 **Description**: The extra budget amendment FiU48 reducing fuel taxes creates a direct structural conflict with Sweden's 2030 climate targets (54% emissions reduction vs. 1990 levels, transport sector currently at -37%). Reduced fuel taxes decrease the economic incentive for EV adoption and carpooling, potentially adding 500,000-1,000,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent annually if sustained beyond 2026.
@@ -614,7 +606,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 **Democratic dimension**: Citizens who voted for parties with climate commitments (S, C, MP, V) may perceive this as a broken promise; trust in climate governance at risk.
 
-### T02 — Constitutional Oversight Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM)
+#### T02 — Constitutional Oversight Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM)
 **Category**: Governance threat  
 **Actors**: KU Committee, Finance Minister Svantesson, former FM Wallström  
 **Description**: The dual KU hearings on 2026-04-21 represent active constitutional scrutiny of both the current government (Svantesson/fiscal processes) and the previous S government (Wallström/foreign policy). If KU hearings reveal ministerial accountability failures, they could trigger formal KU findings that damage reputations and set constitutional precedents.
@@ -625,19 +617,19 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - Dual hearings same day = coordinated KU scrutiny
 - HDA7KU42 (KU granskning meeting) same day suggests active investigation phase
 
-### T03 — Social Cohesion Threat from Eating Disorder Care Failures (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)
+#### T03 — Social Cohesion Threat from Eating Disorder Care Failures (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)
 **Category**: Social welfare governance threat  
 **Actors**: Region Stockholm, Finance Minister Svantesson, S opposition  
 **Description**: HD10442 interpellation (Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M) on eating disorder care in Region Stockholm suggests systemic underfunding of mental health services. If Svantesson's response is inadequate, opposition can escalate to formal motion for increased healthcare funding — potential wedge issue on social welfare vs. fiscal conservatism.
 
-### T04 — Occupational Health Capacity Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)
+#### T04 — Occupational Health Capacity Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)
 **Category**: Labor market governance threat  
 **Actors**: Labor Minister Johan Britz (L), S opposition  
 **Description**: HD10440 interpellation on företagsläkare (occupational physicians) highlights structural gap since Arbetslivsinstitutet abolished 2007. Sweden has approximately 500 active occupational physicians vs. estimated need of 1,500-2,000 — a 60-70% gap. This threatens workplace health monitoring, particularly in sectors with high injury/illness rates.
 
 ---
 
-## Monitoring Triggers
+### Monitoring Triggers
 
 | Trigger Event | Threat | Timeline |
 |---------------|--------|---------|
@@ -649,23 +641,22 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Level: MEDIUM-HIGH
+### Threat Level: MEDIUM-HIGH
 
 The combination of a significant fiscal policy move (FiU48) that tests coalition climate credibility, simultaneous constitutional hearings on both the current and previous governments, and multiple S opposition interpellations on social welfare issues creates a MEDIUM-HIGH aggregate threat environment to Swedish democratic governance quality for the period 2026-04-21 to 2026-05-21.
 
 ## Comparative International
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md -->
 
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md)_
-
-## Overview: Sweden's Fuel Tax Cut + Wind Power Package in Nordic/EU Context
+### Overview: Sweden's Fuel Tax Cut + Wind Power Package in Nordic/EU Context
 
 This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price support) and vindkraft revenue-sharing law against 5+ comparable jurisdictions to assess where Sweden **innovates**, **follows**, or **diverges** from international best practice.
 
 ---
 
-## Nordic Baseline Comparison
+### Nordic Baseline Comparison
 
-### Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)
+#### Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)
 
 | Dimension | Sweden (FiU48/vindkraft) | Denmark | Assessment |
 |-----------|-------------------------|---------|------------|
@@ -676,7 +667,7 @@ This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price suppo
 
 **Key divergence**: Denmark abandoned fossil fuel tax reductions after 2022 energy crisis; Sweden is reintroducing them in 2026. Denmark chose carbon-price stability as a principle; Sweden prioritized short-term affordability. This reflects a fundamental policy philosophy difference.
 
-### Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel Policy)
+#### Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel Policy)
 
 | Dimension | Sweden | Norway | Assessment |
 |-----------|--------|--------|------------|
@@ -685,7 +676,7 @@ This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price suppo
 | Onshore wind opposition | High NIMBY resistance → revenue sharing law | High NIMBY resistance → revenue sharing law | **Sweden FOLLOWS** — Norway's natural damage compensation model predates Sweden's |
 | Data source | FiU48, gov/vindkraft | Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate |
 
-### Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Transition)
+#### Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Transition)
 
 | Dimension | Sweden | Finland | Assessment |
 |-----------|--------|---------|------------|
@@ -696,9 +687,9 @@ This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price suppo
 
 ---
 
-## EU Benchmark Comparison
+### EU Benchmark Comparison
 
-### Sweden vs. Germany (Energiewende Comparison)
+#### Sweden vs. Germany (Energiewende Comparison)
 
 | Dimension | Sweden | Germany | Assessment |
 |-----------|--------|---------|------------|
@@ -707,7 +698,7 @@ This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price suppo
 | Energy price support targeting | Broad (all households) | Targeted (low-income households, Wohngeld) | **Sweden DIVERGES** — Sweden's approach is less targeted, less effective for most vulnerable |
 | Data source | FiU48; German Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz |
 
-### Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy Policy)
+#### Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy Policy)
 
 | Dimension | Sweden | Netherlands | Assessment |
 |-----------|--------|-------------|------------|
@@ -717,21 +708,21 @@ This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price suppo
 
 ---
 
-## Areas of Swedish Innovation
+### Areas of Swedish Innovation
 
-### Innovation 1: Three-Step Vindkraftspaket Architecture
+#### Innovation 1: Three-Step Vindkraftspaket Architecture
 Sweden's coordinated three-step approach (commune subsidies → resident compensation → property buy-out study) is **more systematic** than any single Nordic/EU country's wind acceptance policy. While Denmark has individual elements, Sweden's unified legislative package from one government is structurally innovative.
 
 **Evidence**: gov/vindkraft announcement 2026-04-20; Johan Britz three-step description
 
-### Innovation 2: Combining Fiscal Relief + Green Policy in Single Extra Budget
+#### Innovation 2: Combining Fiscal Relief + Green Policy in Single Extra Budget
 The FiU48 design—cutting fuel taxes while simultaneously providing energy support AND launching a wind power law—creates a "green-fiscal hybrid" that avoids pure fossil subsidy framing. No exact EU parallel found.
 
 **Evidence**: HD01FiU48; gov/vindkraft
 
 ---
 
-## Areas Where Sweden Follows International Models
+### Areas Where Sweden Follows International Models
 
 - **Wind power local compensation**: Sweden explicitly studies Danish property buy-out model (confirmed by Britz statement)
 - **Energy price support**: Follows 2022-2023 Nordic/EU precedents (Denmark, Norway, Finland all implemented similar schemes earlier)
@@ -739,7 +730,7 @@ The FiU48 design—cutting fuel taxes while simultaneously providing energy supp
 
 ---
 
-## Areas Where Sweden Diverges (Risk Flags)
+### Areas Where Sweden Diverges (Risk Flags)
 
 | Divergence | Jurisdictions where Sweden differs | Risk |
 |------------|-----------------------------------|------|
@@ -749,7 +740,7 @@ The FiU48 design—cutting fuel taxes while simultaneously providing energy supp
 
 ---
 
-## Data Sources
+### Data Sources
 
 - World Bank: Energy data Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland
 - EU Commission: State Aid monitoring, fossil subsidy reporting
@@ -759,16 +750,15 @@ The FiU48 design—cutting fuel taxes while simultaneously providing energy supp
 - Finnish Energy Authority (Energiavirasto)
 
 ## Classification Results
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md -->
 
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md)_
-
-## Security Classification: PUBLIC
+### Security Classification: PUBLIC
 
 All documents analyzed are publicly available via Riksdag and Government APIs.
 
 ---
 
-## Document Classification by CIA Triad Impact
+### Document Classification by CIA Triad Impact
 
 | dok_id | Title (abbrev.) | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | RTO | RPO | Overall |
 |--------|----------------|----------------|-----------|--------------|-----|-----|---------|
@@ -778,7 +768,7 @@ All documents analyzed are publicly available via Riksdag and Government APIs.
 | gov/vindkraft | Vindkraft intäktsdelning law | PUBLIC | HIGH (new legislation) | PUBLIC | N/A | Daily | HIGH |
 | HD10441/40/42 | Interpellationer | PUBLIC | MEDIUM (procedural) | PUBLIC | N/A | Weekly | MEDIUM |
 
-## Policy Domain Classification
+### Policy Domain Classification
 
 | Domain | Documents | ISMS Relevance |
 |--------|-----------|----------------|
@@ -788,13 +778,13 @@ All documents analyzed are publicly available via Riksdag and Government APIs.
 | Labor/Health | HD10440, HD10441 | Social welfare governance |
 | Social Welfare | HD10442 | Healthcare accountability |
 
-## GDPR / Privacy Notes
+### GDPR / Privacy Notes
 
 - No personal data beyond publicly elected officials' names
 - KU hearing transcripts are public records
 - No special category personal data processed
 
-## Information Lifecycle
+### Information Lifecycle
 
 | Stage | Action |
 |-------|--------|
@@ -805,15 +795,14 @@ All documents analyzed are publicly available via Riksdag and Government APIs.
 | Retention | Indefinite (public record) |
 | Deletion | N/A |
 
-## Tidöalliansen Mandate Context
+### Tidöalliansen Mandate Context
 
 The Tidöalliansen government (M+SD+KD+L) has governed since October 2022. The 2026 parliamentary election is expected in September 2026, making spring 2026 a critical pre-election period. Both FiU48 and the vindkraft law carry significant electoral framing implications — this classification note is relevant for interpreting the political intent behind simultaneous policy announcements.
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md)_
-
-## Document Relationship Network
+### Document Relationship Network
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -840,27 +829,27 @@ graph TD
     style IP41 fill:#888888,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Thematic Clusters
+### Thematic Clusters
 
-### Cluster A — Affordability + Energy (LEAD)
+#### Cluster A — Affordability + Energy (LEAD)
 - **HD01FiU48** ← LEAD: Extra budget, fuel tax, energy support
 - **gov/vindkraft** ← SECOND: Wind power revenue sharing law
 - **Cross-link**: Both involve Energy/Climate portfolio; both are "relief + green" framing
 - **Minister responsible**: Svantesson (fiscal), Britz (energy/climate)
 
-### Cluster B — Constitutional Accountability
+#### Cluster B — Constitutional Accountability
 - **HDC220260421ou1** ← KU hearing: Svantesson (current M government)
 - **HDC220260421ou2** ← KU hearing: Wallström (previous S government)
 - **HDA7KU42** ← KU granskning meeting (same day)
 - **Cross-link**: KU's annual constitutional review examining both coalition and opposition eras
 
-### Cluster C — Social Policy Probing (Opposition Interpellations)
+#### Cluster C — Social Policy Probing (Opposition Interpellations)
 - **HD10442** ← Ätstörningsvård → Finance Minister (M healthcare accountability)
 - **HD10440** ← Företagsläkare → Labor Minister (occupational health gaps)
 - **HD10441** ← Rättssäkerhet → Justice Minister (court accountability)
 - **Pattern**: S-party interpellations targeting three different ministers = coordinated opposition pressure campaign
 
-## Cross-Run References
+### Cross-Run References
 
 | Prior Run | Key Findings | Status |
 |-----------|-------------|--------|
@@ -868,7 +857,7 @@ graph TD
 | realtime-1240 | KU hearings + FiU48 deep analysis | LOST (session expired) |
 | **realtime-1353** | **REPUBLICATION + vindkraft new addition** | **THIS RUN** |
 
-## Forward Watch
+### Forward Watch
 
 | Forward Event | Expected Date | Linked Docs |
 |---------------|--------------|-------------|
@@ -880,10 +869,9 @@ graph TD
 | IP response: Svantesson on ätstörningsvård | 2026-04-28 | HD10442 |
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md)_
-
-## Methodology Application Matrix
+### Methodology Application Matrix
 
 | Methodology | Applied? | Files Produced | Quality Assessment |
 |------------|----------|----------------|-------------------|
@@ -900,18 +888,18 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation
+### Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation
 
 *(Every forward indicator from last 2 days of sibling realtime-monitor runs, explicitly carried forward or retired with reason)*
 
-### From realtime-1130 (2026-04-21 ~11:30) — LOST run, reconstructed from memory
+#### From realtime-1130 (2026-04-21 ~11:30) — LOST run, reconstructed from memory
 | Watchpoint | Status | Disposition |
 |-----------|--------|-------------|
 | FiU48 committee debate outcome | Carried forward — committee approved | **RESOLVED: FiU48 approved, debate today** |
 | KU hearing G16 Svantesson | Carried forward | **ACTIVE: Hearing completed 11:00, findings pending** |
 | KU hearing G34 Wallström | Carried forward | **ACTIVE: Hearing completed 12:00, findings pending** |
 
-### From realtime-1240 (2026-04-21 ~12:40) — LOST run, memory reconstruction
+#### From realtime-1240 (2026-04-21 ~12:40) — LOST run, memory reconstruction
 | Watchpoint | Status | Disposition |
 |-----------|--------|-------------|
 | FiU48 chamber vote timing | Forward indicator: 24-48h from committee approval | **ACTIVE: Vote expected 2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24** |
@@ -920,7 +908,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Interpellation responses x3 | Forward indicator | **ACTIVE: Expected 2026-04-28** |
 | EU Commission fuel subsidy monitoring | Forward indicator | **ACTIVE: Tracked in R03, scenario-analysis** |
 
-### All Watchpoints Summary
+#### All Watchpoints Summary
 - **4 RESOLVED or progressed**: FiU48 committee → approved
 - **6 ACTIVE**: Chamber vote, KU findings, vindkraft implementation, 3 interpellation responses, EU monitoring
 - **1 NEW (not in prior runs)**: Vindkraft intäktsdelning law (announced after 1240 run, added to this run)
@@ -928,8 +916,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 ---
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-21 13:55 UTC
 **Run ID**: realtime-1353
@@ -937,7 +924,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **MCP Status**: live (2026-04-21T13:53:57Z)
 **Documents Analyzed**: 7 primary + 4 government press releases
 
-## Primary Documents (date-filtered 2026-04-21)
+### Primary Documents (date-filtered 2026-04-21)
 
 | dok_id | Type | Title | Organ | Significance |
 |--------|------|-------|-------|-------------|
@@ -949,7 +936,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD10442 | ip | Uttalanden om ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm | - | MEDIUM |
 | HD01TU16 | bet | Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning | TU | LOW |
 
-## Government Press Releases (2026-04-20)
+### Government Press Releases (2026-04-20)
 
 | ID | Title | Significance |
 |----|-------|-------------|
@@ -958,14 +945,32 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | 154-miljoner-kronor-i-stod-till-demokrati-... | 15,4 miljoner kronor i stöd till Ukraina | MEDIUM |
 | riksrevisionens-rapport-om-tandvardsstodet | Riksrevisionens rapport om Tandvårdsstödet | LOW |
 
-## Previous Run Status
+### Previous Run Status
 
 - Run realtime-1240 (run_id: 24722758908): **FAILED_SESSION_EXPIRED** — articles lost, no published PR
 - Run realtime-1130: Status unknown, likely covered HD01FiU48 but PR may have failed
 - **Conclusion**: All today's content requires republication
 
-## Lead Story Assessment
+### Lead Story Assessment
 
 **Primary Lead**: HD01FiU48 — Riksdag Finance Committee approves extra budget amendment reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support (FiU48 debate scheduled 2026-04-21)
 
 **Secondary**: Wind power revenue-sharing law — new compensation for residents near turbines (new proposition by Acting Climate Minister Johan Britz)
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/article.md
index 1007f031f6..e52e540f4e 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-22
 subfolder: evening-analysis
 slug: 2026-04-22-evening-analysis
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.900Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.699Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,18 +26,17 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package today (HD01FiU48) with an anomalous M+SD+S+KD supermajority — the Social Democrats abandoning their climate counter-motion to avoid being blamed for high fuel costs four months before the September 2026 election. Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) simultaneously faces a concentrated five-interpellation accountability offensive from S, including one (HD10442) citing a court ruling that her public statements on eating disorder care were factually incorrect. The Spring Proposition 2026 (HD03100) sets the pre-election fiscal battleground.
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Media/editorial decision**: Is the "S votes for fuel tax cut while filing counter-motion" narrative the lead story for the day? → **Yes.** The dual-track behaviour (HD01FiU48 vote Ja + HD024082 opposing motion) is the most analytically significant finding of the day. It reveals S's electoral calculation — pre-election cost-of-living calculus overrides climate consistency. Confidence: HIGH [A1].
 
@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package to
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read
+### ⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read
 
 - **ENACTED TODAY**: HD01FiU48 — 4.1 GSEK fuel tax cut & energy support, voted 16:29. M+SD+S+KD voted Ja.
 - **STRATEGIC CONTRADICTION**: S votes Ja on enacted bill but filed opposition motion (HD024082) against same policy.
@@ -60,7 +59,7 @@ Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package to
 
 ---
 
-## 🔮 Top Forward Trigger
+### 🔮 Top Forward Trigger
 
 **Watch for**: Riksdag debate on HD10442 (Svantesson ätstörningsvård IP) — scheduled post-May 5. If Svantesson cannot reconcile her prior public statements with the court ruling, this becomes the biggest ministerial accountability moment of the pre-election period. Probability of significant political damage: **Likely** [B2] (65%).
 
@@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package to
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Confidence Dashboard
+### 📊 Confidence Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1B5E20', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'nodeBorder': '#FFFFFF'}}}%%
@@ -90,8 +89,7 @@ pie title Confidence Distribution by Admiralty Code
 - Svantesson's parliamentary exposure from HD10442 court reference
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Synthesis ID**: SYN-2026-04-22-EVE001
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-22 23:50 UTC
@@ -103,7 +101,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Lead Story Decision
+### 🎯 Lead Story Decision
 
 **PRIMARY: HD01FiU48 ENACTED — Extra Ändringsbudget 4.1 GSEK adopted today by anomalous cross-party supermajority**
 
@@ -123,7 +121,7 @@ Three opposition parties filed nearly identical counter-motions rejecting HD0323
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard
+### 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -156,7 +154,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture
+### 🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -198,7 +196,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings
+### 🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings
 
 | Rank | Finding | Source | Significance | Confidence |
 |------|---------|--------|--------------|------------|
@@ -210,7 +208,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context
 
 **Collection method**: Open-source parliamentary records (riksdagen.se API via riksdag-regering MCP). All documents are publicly filed (GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)).
 **PIR coverage**:
@@ -226,8 +224,7 @@ graph LR
 - Meta Description: "The Riksdag voted through a 4.1 billion SEK fuel tax and energy price relief package on April 22, 2026 — with the opposition Social Democrats joining the governing coalition in an extraordinary cross-party majority, signalling the start of the pre-election economic battle."
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Assessment ID**: IA-2026-04-22-EVE001
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
@@ -237,7 +234,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1)
+### Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1)
 
 **The S dual-track strategy on HD01FiU48 — voting Ja in chamber while filing climate counter-motion — is a deliberate electoral calculation, not a policy incoherence.**
 
@@ -251,7 +248,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2)
+### Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2)
 
 **Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) faces a heightened ministerial accountability risk from interpellation HD10442 because the court documentation attached makes denial structurally difficult.**
 
@@ -265,7 +262,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3)
+### Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3)
 
 **The Spring Proposition 2026 (HD03100) — the last vårproposition before the September 2026 election — defines the central economic battleground, and S will systematically contest every major fiscal assumption.**
 
@@ -279,7 +276,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4)
+### Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4)
 
 **The simultaneous grundlag first readings (HD01KU33 + HD01KU32) reflect an unusually active constitutional reform agenda that will require a second reading in the next riksmöte — creating campaign complications for all parties.**
 
@@ -291,7 +288,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5)
+### Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5)
 
 **Sweden's accession to both the Ukraina compensation commission (HD03232) and the international aggression tribunal (HD03231) on the same day signals a coherent and deepening Western alignment commitment beyond mere NATO membership.**
 
@@ -303,7 +300,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Prior-Cycle PIR Continuity (Carried-Forward from 2026-04-21)
+### Prior-Cycle PIR Continuity (Carried-Forward from 2026-04-21)
 
 | Prior PIR | Status from 2026-04-21 | Updated status 2026-04-22 |
 |-----------|------------------------|---------------------------|
@@ -319,7 +316,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Assumptions Check
+### Key Assumptions Check
 
 | Assumption | Confidence | Sensitivity | If wrong... |
 |------------|------------|-------------|-------------|
@@ -329,8 +326,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 | Election remains on schedule September 13, 2026 | VERY HIGH [A1] | Low | Early election (5% probability, Wild Card W1) |
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Methodology**: DIW weighting per significance-scoring.md template
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
@@ -339,7 +335,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 DIW Scoring Framework
+### 📊 DIW Scoring Framework
 
 | Dimension | Weight | Scale | Description |
 |-----------|--------|-------|-------------|
@@ -351,7 +347,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Ranked Documents
+### Ranked Documents
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -388,7 +384,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## Detailed DIW Scoring Table
+### Detailed DIW Scoring Table
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title (abridged) | D | I | W | DIW | Admiralty | Source |
 |------|--------|-----------------|---|---|---|-----|-----------|--------|
@@ -405,7 +401,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## Sensitivity Analysis
+### Sensitivity Analysis
 
 **If S had voted Nej on HD01FiU48**: The electoral and strategic significance score would drop from 9.2 to 7.0 — the measure would be a standard coalition achievement, not a cross-party anomaly.
 
@@ -414,8 +410,7 @@ flowchart LR
 **If HD03100 Vårproposition fails FiU committee vote**: This would be a constitutional crisis; significance would reach 10.0. Probability: Remote [E5] (<3%).
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Media Framing
@@ -423,7 +418,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Per-Party Framing Predictions
+### Per-Party Framing Predictions
 
 | Party | Expected framing of HD01FiU48 | Expected framing of S interpellations |
 |-------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
@@ -438,7 +433,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Media Quadrant Analysis
+### Media Quadrant Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -460,21 +455,21 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Key Framing Battles
+### Key Framing Battles
 
-### Battle 1: "Relief" vs. "Fossil Subsidy"
+#### Battle 1: "Relief" vs. "Fossil Subsidy"
 
 - **Government + S framing**: This is household cost relief for families facing high fuel bills
 - **V+MP+L framing**: This is a retrograde fossil fuel subsidy at exactly the wrong moment
 - **Prediction**: Relief framing will dominate Swedish tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) in the short term; fossil subsidy framing will dominate opinion/editorial pages (DN, SvD environmental desks)
 
-### Battle 2: S Credibility — "Consistent Opposition" vs. "Opportunist"
+#### Battle 2: S Credibility — "Consistent Opposition" vs. "Opportunist"
 
 - **S framing**: We support families AND hold the government accountable
 - **Government parties framing**: S voted Ja for the measure they filed a motion against — they cannot be trusted
 - **Prediction**: Government parties will use the dual-track contradiction in campaign ads. S will rely on voters not tracking committee motions.
 
-### Battle 3: "Accountability" vs. "Obstruction"
+#### Battle 3: "Accountability" vs. "Obstruction"
 
 - **S framing (interpellations)**: We ask hard questions with court documentation
 - **Government framing**: Opposition filibustering pre-election with procedural tools
@@ -482,7 +477,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Narrative Radar
+### Narrative Radar
 
 **Dominant expected narrative for 2026-04-22 evening news**:
 > "Riksdag enacts fuel tax relief with broad cross-party support, while Socialdemokraterna simultaneously signals opposition through committee motions — and files five accountability interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson."
@@ -492,8 +487,7 @@ quadrantChart
 **Admiralty**: [B3] — media framing prediction based on structural analysis of party positions and historical press coverage patterns; not verified against actual press coverage.
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: stakeholder-impact.md (6-lens matrix, named actors)
@@ -501,7 +495,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Influence Network Overview
+### Influence Network Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -536,9 +530,9 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
+### 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
 
-### Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L+C)
+#### Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L+C)
 
 **Named actors**: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M), Acting PM Lotta Edholm (L), Minister Johan Britz (KD), Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)
 
@@ -549,7 +543,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | L (Liberalerna) | Supported (Edholm co-signed HD03236) | Supported | MEDIUM — wind power YIMBY frictions | HD03239 riksdagen.se |
 | C (Centerpartiet) | Supported | Supported | LOW-MEDIUM — filed partial opposition motion HD024095 on utvisning | HD024095 riksdagen.se |
 
-### Lens 2: Support Party (SD)
+#### Lens 2: Support Party (SD)
 
 **Named actors**: Julia Kronlid, Patrick Reslow, Björn Söder (SD, voted Ja on HD01FiU48)
 
@@ -559,7 +553,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | No counter-motion filed | SD has no climate objections to fuel tax cut — consistent with their anti-green agenda | Absence of SD counter-motion (riksdagen.se) |
 | Ukraine IPs: unclear | SD's position on HD03232 (Ukraina commission) not confirmed in available data | — |
 
-### Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)
+#### Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)
 
 **Named actors**: Kenneth G. Forslund, Anders Ygeman, Mikael Damberg, Fredrik Olovsson (FiU), Markus Kallifatides, Peder Björk, Jonathan Svensson, Åsa Eriksson (interpellants)
 
@@ -569,7 +563,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | Filed 5 interpellations in 48 hours | Pre-election accountability escalation | None — internally consistent strategy | HD10442–HD10446 riksdagen.se |
 | Coordinated HD10442 with court evidence | Strongest possible accountability mechanism — court ruling makes denial impossible | May overreach if Svantesson issues convincing clarification | HD10442 riksdagen.se |
 
-### Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP, V)
+#### Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP, V)
 
 **Named actors**: Opposition MPs filing HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP), HD024090 (V), HD024097 (MP), HD024096 (MP)
 
@@ -579,7 +573,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | V (Vänsterpartiet) | Opposed HD01FiU48; filed HD024092, HD024090-091 | Economic justice + anti-arms export (HD024091) | HD024092 riksdagen.se |
 | Both parties | Opposed new utvisning rules but with different framings | V: rule-of-law; MP: human rights | HD024090/097 riksdagen.se |
 
-### Lens 5: Civil Society / Institutional Actors
+#### Lens 5: Civil Society / Institutional Actors
 
 | Actor | Relevance | Source |
 |-------|-----------|--------|
@@ -588,7 +582,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | Swedish consumers (~5M motorists) | Direct beneficiaries of HD01FiU48 fuel tax cut May–Sep 2026 | HD01FiU48 fiscal note |
 | Ukrainian government | Benefits from HD03232 compensation commission + HD03231 aggression tribunal | HD03232+HD03231 riksdagen.se |
 
-### Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessment
+#### Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessment
 
 | Party | E2026 impact of today's events | Probability of gain/loss |
 |-------|-------------------------------|-------------------------|
@@ -599,8 +593,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | KD/L | No major exposure; KD (Johan Britz) advancing wind power (positive) | STABLE |
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Forward Indicators
@@ -609,7 +602,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## 72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)
+### 72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected signal | Confidence | Admiralty |
 |---|-----------|----------------|------------|-----------|
@@ -620,7 +613,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## 1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)
+### 1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected signal | Confidence | Admiralty |
 |---|-----------|----------------|------------|-----------|
@@ -631,7 +624,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## 1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)
+### 1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected signal | Confidence | Admiralty |
 |---|-----------|----------------|------------|-----------|
@@ -642,7 +635,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Election Horizon (by 2026-09)
+### Election Horizon (by 2026-09)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected signal | Confidence | Admiralty |
 |---|-----------|----------------|------------|-----------|
@@ -653,7 +646,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## PIR Watch Linkage
+### PIR Watch Linkage
 
 | PIR | Lead indicator | Timeline |
 |-----|---------------|---------|
@@ -665,15 +658,14 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Indicator Summary
+### Indicator Summary
 
 **Total indicators**: 16 (exceeds minimum requirement of 10)
 **Horizon coverage**: 4/4 horizons represented (72h: 4, 1-week: 4, 1-month: 4, election: 4)
 **Admiralty range**: [A1] through [C3] — appropriate uncertainty gradient across time horizons
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **SCN-ID**: SCN-2026-04-22-EVE001
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
@@ -682,7 +674,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Taxonomy
+### Scenario Taxonomy
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -699,9 +691,9 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Base Scenario Analysis
+### Base Scenario Analysis
 
-### Scenario 1: Coalition Consolidation (Probability: 45%)
+#### Scenario 1: Coalition Consolidation (Probability: 45%)
 
 **Definition**: HD01FiU48 delivers electoral dividend for the governing coalition; Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100) becomes the positive narrative anchor; S accountability offensive fails to gain traction.
 
@@ -721,7 +713,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario 2: Accountability Crisis (Probability: 30%)
+#### Scenario 2: Accountability Crisis (Probability: 30%)
 
 **Definition**: S's coordinated accountability offensive succeeds; HD10442 forces Svantesson into publicly untenable position; Finance Committee activities become a pre-election liability.
 
@@ -742,7 +734,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario 3: Climate Fracture (Probability: 15%)
+#### Scenario 3: Climate Fracture (Probability: 15%)
 
 **Definition**: S's Ja vote on HD01FiU48 while simultaneously filing counter-motions erodes their climate credibility; MP and V gain at S's expense among climate-prioritising voters.
 
@@ -760,7 +752,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario 4: Wild Card — EU Challenge (Probability: 5%)
+#### Scenario 4: Wild Card — EU Challenge (Probability: 5%)
 
 **Definition**: European Commission challenges HD03236/HD01FiU48 fuel tax reduction as incompatible with EU energy taxation directive or state aid rules.
 
@@ -770,7 +762,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-### Scenario 5: Wild Card — Early Election (Probability: 5%)
+#### Scenario 5: Wild Card — Early Election (Probability: 5%)
 
 **Definition**: Accountability pressure accumulates beyond manageable level; Kristersson government faces confidence vote; early election called.
 
@@ -780,7 +772,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Probability Distribution
+### Scenario Probability Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -794,7 +786,7 @@ pie title Scenario Probabilities (Sums to 100%)
 
 ---
 
-## Leading Indicators Per Scenario
+### Leading Indicators Per Scenario
 
 | Scenario | Indicator | Source | Horizon |
 |----------|-----------|--------|---------|
@@ -807,8 +799,7 @@ pie title Scenario Probabilities (Sums to 100%)
 | W2 | Commission notification on HD03236 | EU Official Journal | 2026-06+ |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Methodology**: political-risk-methodology.md (5-dimension register, L×I scoring)
@@ -816,7 +807,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Overview
+### Risk Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#B71C1C', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -839,7 +830,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 5-Dimension Risk Register
+### 5-Dimension Risk Register
 
 | Risk | L (1–5) | I (1–5) | L×I | Priority | Source | Admiralty |
 |------|---------|---------|-----|----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -854,7 +845,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Cascading Chains
+### Risk Cascading Chains
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -880,7 +871,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Posterior Probabilities
+### Posterior Probabilities
 
 | Risk | Base Rate | Updated P | Trigger |
 |------|-----------|-----------|---------|
@@ -890,8 +881,7 @@ flowchart TD
 | HD10443 social dumpning triggers media investigation | 25% | **45%** | Pattern of multiple S interpellations on same theme is investigative journalism signal |
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: political-swot-framework.md
@@ -900,7 +890,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 SWOT Overview
+### 🎯 SWOT Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1B5E20', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'primaryBorderColor': '#C8E6C9', 'lineColor': '#546E7A', 'secondaryColor': '#0D47A1', 'tertiaryColor': '#37474F', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -924,7 +914,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## ✅ Strengths
+### ✅ Strengths
 
 | Strength | Evidence | Admiralty | Confidence |
 |----------|----------|-----------|------------|
@@ -936,7 +926,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## ⚠️ Weaknesses
+### ⚠️ Weaknesses
 
 | Weakness | Evidence | Admiralty | Confidence |
 |----------|----------|-----------|------------|
@@ -948,7 +938,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🚀 Opportunities
+### 🚀 Opportunities
 
 | Opportunity | Evidence | Admiralty | Confidence |
 |-------------|----------|-----------|------------|
@@ -959,7 +949,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ Threats
+### ⚡ Threats
 
 | Threat | Evidence | Admiralty | Confidence |
 |--------|----------|-----------|------------|
@@ -970,7 +960,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## TOWS Matrix
+### TOWS Matrix
 
 | | External Opportunities | External Threats |
 |---|----------------------|-----------------|
@@ -978,8 +968,7 @@ quadrantChart
 | **Internal Weaknesses** | WO: Address S dual-track contradiction by forcing S to explain their simultaneous Ja vote and opposition motion | WT: Pre-empt Svantesson accountability crisis (HD10442) with proactive ministerial statement before IP debate is scheduled |
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: political-threat-framework.md (Political Threat Taxonomy, attack tree)
@@ -988,7 +977,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy Overview
+### Political Threat Taxonomy Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#C62828', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'lineColor': '#90CAF9'}}}%%
@@ -1019,7 +1008,7 @@ mindmap
 
 ---
 
-## Attack Tree Analysis
+### Attack Tree Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1059,7 +1048,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Parliamentary Accountability Chain
+### Parliamentary Accountability Chain
 
 | Phase | Action | Actor | Status | Source |
 |-------|--------|-------|--------|--------|
@@ -1072,7 +1061,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Tactics)
+### MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Tactics)
 
 | TTP | Tactic | Technique | Procedure | Source |
 |-----|--------|-----------|-----------|--------|
@@ -1083,7 +1072,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Probability Assessment
+### Threat Probability Assessment
 
 | Threat | Current State | Probability | Timeline | Admiralty |
 |--------|--------------|-------------|----------|-----------|
@@ -1095,18 +1084,17 @@ flowchart TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01CU27
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01CU27
 **Title**: Betänkande CU27 — Civilutskottet bostadsrätt/hyresrätt reform
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Betänkande CU27 — Civilutskottet bostadsrätt/hyresrätt reform. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1115,18 +1103,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD01CU28
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01CU28
 **Title**: Betänkande CU28 — Civilutskottet bostadsrättslagen ändring
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Betänkande CU28 — Civilutskottet bostadsrättslagen ändring. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1135,8 +1122,7 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD01FiU48
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01FiU48
 **Type**: Betänkande (committee report — FiU)
@@ -1147,7 +1133,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD01FiU48 is the committee report on the government's extra ändringsbudget for 2026 addressing fuel and energy costs. The proposition HD03236 was the originating government bill. FiU voted to adopt the measure, and it was enacted by the chamber at 16:29 on 2026-04-22.
 
@@ -1158,7 +1144,7 @@ HD01FiU48 is the committee report on the government's extra ändringsbudget for
 
 ---
 
-## Vote Record
+### Vote Record
 
 | Party | Position | Seats |
 |-------|---------|-------|
@@ -1175,7 +1161,7 @@ HD01FiU48 is the committee report on the government's extra ändringsbudget for
 
 ---
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: W (Warning) — Enacted measure immediately affects national budget and sets political precedent for cross-bloc cooperation.
 
@@ -1186,18 +1172,17 @@ HD01FiU48 is the committee report on the government's extra ändringsbudget for
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for vote record; [B2] for political significance assessment.
 
 ### HD01KU32
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01KU32
 **Title**: Betänkande KU32 — Grundlagsändring medietillgänglighet (Stage 1)
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Betänkande KU32 — Grundlagsändring medietillgänglighet (Stage 1). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1206,18 +1191,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD01KU33
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01KU33
 **Title**: Betänkande KU33 — Grundlagsändring husrannsakan insyn (Stage 1)
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Betänkande KU33 — Grundlagsändring husrannsakan insyn (Stage 1). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1226,8 +1210,7 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD024082
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024082-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024082
 **Type**: Motion
@@ -1239,7 +1222,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD024082 is one of three parallel climate counter-motions filed by S, V, and MP respectively against the fuel tax cut measure (HD03236/HD01FiU48). S filed HD024082 while simultaneously voting Ja on HD01FiU48 in the chamber — creating the "dual-track contradiction" that is a central analytical finding.
 
@@ -1250,7 +1233,7 @@ HD024082 is one of three parallel climate counter-motions filed by S, V, and MP
 
 ---
 
-## Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis
+### Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis
 
 | S action | Date | Parliament record |
 |----------|------|------------------|
@@ -1261,7 +1244,7 @@ HD024082 is one of three parallel climate counter-motions filed by S, V, and MP
 
 ---
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — HD024082 is an indicator of S's internal strategic tensions between climate/environmental wing and rural/cost-of-living electoral bloc.
 
@@ -1273,18 +1256,17 @@ HD024082 is one of three parallel climate counter-motions filed by S, V, and MP
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document facts; [B2] for strategic significance.
 
 ### HD024090
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024090-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024090-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024090
 **Title**: Motion 2024/90 — Klimat och energiomställning (relaterad)
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Motion 2024/90 — Klimat och energiomställning (relaterad). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1293,18 +1275,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD024092
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024092-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024092-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024092
 **Title**: Motion V — Klimatmotion mot HD03236 (parallell till HD024082)
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Motion V — Klimatmotion mot HD03236 (parallell till HD024082). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1313,18 +1294,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD024095
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024095-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024095-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024095
 **Title**: Motion 2024/95 — Energipolitik
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Motion 2024/95 — Energipolitik. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1333,18 +1313,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD024097
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024097-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024097-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024097
 **Title**: Motion 2024/97 — Energi och klimat
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Motion 2024/97 — Energi och klimat. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1353,18 +1332,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD024098
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024098-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024098-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024098
 **Title**: Motion MP — Miljöpartiet klimatmotion mot HD03236
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Motion MP — Miljöpartiet klimatmotion mot HD03236. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1373,8 +1351,7 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD03100
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03100-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03100
 **Type**: Proposition (Vårproposition 2026)
@@ -1385,7 +1362,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD03100 is the 2026 Economic Spring Budget (Vårproposition). As a pre-election document, it sets the government's fiscal framework and public spending priorities for the upcoming election campaign period. Filed approximately 5 months before the September 2026 election.
 
@@ -1398,7 +1375,7 @@ HD03100 is the 2026 Economic Spring Budget (Vårproposition). As a pre-election
 
 ---
 
-## Pre-Election Fiscal Manifesto Assessment
+### Pre-Election Fiscal Manifesto Assessment
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Vårproposition is a structural policy statement that anchors fiscal expectations for election campaign period.
 
@@ -1409,7 +1386,7 @@ The Vårproposition is the government's last major economic document before the
 
 ---
 
-## Strategic Significance
+### Strategic Significance
 
 - Locks in the fiscal baseline that any successor government inherits
 - The 4.1 GSEK HD01FiU48 appropriation now embedded in this baseline
@@ -1418,18 +1395,17 @@ The Vårproposition is the government's last major economic document before the
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B2] for content assessment (derived from sibling folder).
 
 ### HD03232
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03232-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03232-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03232
 **Title**: Prop HD03232 — Sverige ansluter sig till ukrainskt skadeståndsregister
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Prop HD03232 — Sverige ansluter sig till ukrainskt skadeståndsregister. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1438,18 +1414,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD03236
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03236-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03236
 **Title**: Prop HD03236 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (source for HD01FiU48)
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Prop HD03236 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (source for HD01FiU48). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1458,18 +1433,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD03239
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03239-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03239-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03239
 **Title**: Prop HD03239 — Stärkt försörjningsberedskap inom energiområdet
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Prop HD03239 — Stärkt försörjningsberedskap inom energiområdet. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1478,18 +1452,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD03240
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03240-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03240-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03240
 **Title**: Prop HD03240 — Nya elsystemlagar och energisäkerhetsramverk
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Prop HD03240 — Nya elsystemlagar och energisäkerhetsramverk. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1498,18 +1471,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD0399
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD0399-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD0399-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD0399
 **Title**: Prop HD0399 — Vårändringbudget 2026
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Prop HD0399 — Vårändringbudget 2026. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1518,8 +1490,7 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD10442
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10442-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10442-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10442
 **Type**: Interpellation
@@ -1531,7 +1502,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD10442-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD10442 is an interpellation to a government minister (Svantesson or Health Ministry) regarding eating disorders and fiscal prioritisation. The filing MP obtained court documentation as evidence — this elevates the interpellation from typical accountability question to documented legal record.
 
@@ -1542,7 +1513,7 @@ HD10442 is an interpellation to a government minister (Svantesson or Health Mini
 
 ---
 
-## Parliamentary Process
+### Parliamentary Process
 
 | Stage | Status | Expected timing |
 |-------|--------|----------------|
@@ -1553,7 +1524,7 @@ HD10442 is an interpellation to a government minister (Svantesson or Health Mini
 
 ---
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: W (Warning) — The court documentation makes this interpellation uniquely persistent. Unlike most IPs that are answered perfunctorily, HD10442 creates a documented record that will outlast the parliamentary session.
 
@@ -1562,18 +1533,17 @@ HD10442 is an interpellation to a government minister (Svantesson or Health Mini
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document/filing facts; [B2] for strategic significance assessment.
 
 ### HD10443
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10443-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10443-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10443
 **Title**: Interpellation HD10443 — Social dumpning (Svantesson)
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Interpellation HD10443 — Social dumpning (Svantesson). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1582,18 +1552,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD10444
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10444-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10444-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10444
 **Title**: Interpellation HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgifter bostadssektor
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Interpellation HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgifter bostadssektor. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1602,18 +1571,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD10445
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10445-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10445-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10445
 **Title**: Interpellation HD10445 — Energikostnader hushåll
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Interpellation HD10445 — Energikostnader hushåll. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1622,18 +1590,17 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ### HD10446
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10446-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10446-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10446
 **Title**: Interpellation HD10446 — Uppföljning socialtjänst
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Interpellation HD10446 — Uppföljning socialtjänst. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 
 **DIW**: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.
 
@@ -1642,8 +1609,7 @@ See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.
 **Admiralty**: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md + Kent Scale WEP
@@ -1652,7 +1618,7 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Seat Projection Context
+### Seat Projection Context
 
 **Current Riksdag composition** (349 seats):
 - Government (Tidökoalitionen): M + SD + KD + L ≈ 176 seats (bare majority)
@@ -1675,9 +1641,9 @@ pie title Current Riksdag Seat Distribution
 
 ---
 
-## Today's Electoral Impact Analysis
+### Today's Electoral Impact Analysis
 
-### HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut (Electoral Dimension)
+#### HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut (Electoral Dimension)
 
 | Party | Vote | Electoral gain/loss |
 |-------|------|---------------------|
@@ -1694,7 +1660,7 @@ pie title Current Riksdag Seat Distribution
 
 ---
 
-### HD10442-HD10446 — Interpellation Offensive (Electoral Dimension)
+#### HD10442-HD10446 — Interpellation Offensive (Electoral Dimension)
 
 The S accountability offensive targeting Svantesson (Finance), housing minister, and social minister is a classic pre-election positioning move. The eating disorder court documentation in HD10442 demonstrates opposition research capacity.
 
@@ -1702,34 +1668,34 @@ The S accountability offensive targeting Svantesson (Finance), housing minister,
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Scenario Analysis (Election 2026)
+### Coalition Scenario Analysis (Election 2026)
 
-### Scenario A: Government coalition wins (Tidökoalitionen majority)
+#### Scenario A: Government coalition wins (Tidökoalitionen majority)
 **Probability**: ~35% (based on current trends)
 - Requires SD to maintain ~20% polling
 - M to consolidate centre-right vote share
 - Key indicator: Fuel tax cut voter credit (→ SD/M benefit)
 
-### Scenario B: S-led government with V+MP support
+#### Scenario B: S-led government with V+MP support
 **Probability**: ~40% (slight S polling advantage)
 - S at ~32% in most polls (post-vårproposition period)
 - V+MP above 4% threshold both needed
 - Key risk: S dual-track strategy may alienate environmental progressive flank
 
-### Scenario C: Hung parliament / Grand coalition pressure
+#### Scenario C: Hung parliament / Grand coalition pressure
 **Probability**: ~20%
 - Neither bloc at 175+
 - C acting as kingmaker from centre
 - Constitutional reform (HD01KU32/KU33) could influence rules for minority government
 
-### Scenario D: Snap election before September
+#### Scenario D: Snap election before September
 **Probability**: ~5%
 - Only if government loses confidence vote on budgetary grounds
 - HD01FiU48 passage with cross-party majority actually REDUCES this risk
 
 ---
 
-## Election Countdown Indicators (144 days)
+### Election Countdown Indicators (144 days)
 
 | Indicator | Current Status | Expected development |
 |-----------|---------------|---------------------|
@@ -1740,8 +1706,7 @@ The S accountability offensive targeting Svantesson (Finance), housing minister,
 | Budget baseline | 4.1 GSEK deterioration | May require austerity framing after election |
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Coalition Mathematics
@@ -1750,7 +1715,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Current Seat Distribution (2025/26 Riksdag)
+### Current Seat Distribution (2025/26 Riksdag)
 
 | Party | Seats | Bloc | Government role |
 |-------|-------|------|-----------------|
@@ -1769,7 +1734,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## HD01FiU48 Vote Record — Pivotal Coalition Analysis
+### HD01FiU48 Vote Record — Pivotal Coalition Analysis
 
 | Party | Vote on HD01FiU48 | Seats contributing to Ja majority |
 |-------|------------------|----------------------------------|
@@ -1789,7 +1754,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Sainte-Laguë Scenario Table (for reference — election 2026 simulation)
+### Sainte-Laguë Scenario Table (for reference — election 2026 simulation)
 
 Using approximate current poll averages (April 2026):
 
@@ -1813,7 +1778,7 @@ Using approximate current poll averages (April 2026):
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Viability Matrix
+### Coalition Viability Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -1836,7 +1801,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Key Mathematical Finding
+### Key Mathematical Finding
 
 The HD01FiU48 cross-party majority (M+SD+KD+S) is **constitutionally and electorally significant** because:
 1. It demonstrates S can cooperate on budget issues across the bloc divide
@@ -1846,8 +1811,7 @@ The HD01FiU48 cross-party majority (M+SD+KD+S) is **constitutionally and elector
 **WEP**: It is **Unlikely** [15–25%] that L would formally withdraw from the government coalition over this single vote. However, it is **Likely** [60–70%] that L will emphasise its Nej vote in campaign materials as environmental credibility marker.
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Voter Segmentation
@@ -1855,7 +1819,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Segment Impact Matrix — HD01FiU48 (Fuel Tax Cut)
+### Segment Impact Matrix — HD01FiU48 (Fuel Tax Cut)
 
 | Segment | Size est. | Impact of HD01FiU48 | Likely primary beneficiary party |
 |---------|-----------|---------------------|----------------------------------|
@@ -1870,7 +1834,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Geographic Segmentation
+### Geographic Segmentation
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#006AA7', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -1891,7 +1855,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## Interpellation Offensive — Voter Segment Impact
+### Interpellation Offensive — Voter Segment Impact
 
 | IP (dok_id) | Issue | Target segment | S positioning |
 |-------------|-------|---------------|---------------|
@@ -1903,7 +1867,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ---
 
-## Key Segmentation Finding
+### Key Segmentation Finding
 
 The critical voter segment is **rural S-leaning voters** (traditional social democrat base that has drifted to SD). Today's events create a complex picture for this group:
 - HD01FiU48 Ja vote from S = direct benefit signal
@@ -1913,8 +1877,7 @@ The critical voter segment is **rural S-leaning voters** (traditional social dem
 **Net assessment**: The fuel cut Ja vote is likely more electorally legible to this segment than the technical counter-motion. S has calculated correctly that the visible action (Ja vote) outweighs the insider opposition (committee motion). **Likelihood this segment returns to S**: Unlikely to Very Unlikely without additional signal; HD01FiU48 Ja vote is necessary but not sufficient. Admiralty: [B3].
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: comparative-international.md template
@@ -1923,13 +1886,13 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator Set
+### Comparator Set
 
 **Comparator set**: Norway (NO), Finland (FI), Germany (DE) — all Nordic/EU neighbours facing similar energy policy and fiscal dilemmas in 2025–2026.
 
 ---
 
-## Comparative Analysis: Fuel Tax Policy (HD01FiU48 Context)
+### Comparative Analysis: Fuel Tax Policy (HD01FiU48 Context)
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -1951,7 +1914,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Jurisdiction Comparison Table
+### Jurisdiction Comparison Table
 
 | Jurisdiction | Measure | Duration | Fiscal Cost | Political Outcome | Admiralty |
 |--------------|---------|----------|-------------|-------------------|-----------|
@@ -1962,7 +1925,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Outside-In Analysis
+### Outside-In Analysis
 
 **Lesson from Norway**: Norway's 2022–23 fuel tax reduction was ~2.5× larger than Sweden's (relative to GDP) and was reversed when energy prices normalised. Swedish policymakers should plan explicit sunset conditions beyond the stated May–September 2026 window to avoid politically painful renewal discussions in an election year.
 
@@ -1973,8 +1936,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Sweden-specific factors not present in comparators**: Sweden has an election in 5 months; none of the comparators faced election-year timing. This amplifies both the political benefit (electoral optics) and the political risk (being held accountable if benefits are not felt by voters).
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Historical Parallels
@@ -1982,7 +1944,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Precedent 1: Cross-Bloc Fiscal Emergency Measures (2008–2009)
+### Precedent 1: Cross-Bloc Fiscal Emergency Measures (2008–2009)
 
 **Parallel**: During the global financial crisis (2008–2009), Sweden's centre-right Alliansregering passed several emergency fiscal measures with tacit S support in key Riksdag votes to stabilise the economy ahead of the 2010 election.
 
@@ -1997,7 +1959,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Precedent 2: S Dual-Track Strategy — The LAS Compromise (2022)
+### Precedent 2: S Dual-Track Strategy — The LAS Compromise (2022)
 
 **Parallel**: In 2022, S simultaneously supported LAS (lagen om anställningsskydd) reform as part of the Tidö negotiations while the S party apparatus formally opposed the reform trajectory through affiliated union lobbying. This created a similar dual-track pattern.
 
@@ -2012,7 +1974,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Precedent 3: Fuel Tax Reduction Reversal Risk — Swedish Fuel Tax History
+### Precedent 3: Fuel Tax Reduction Reversal Risk — Swedish Fuel Tax History
 
 **Parallel**: Sweden introduced the current fuel tax framework under Alliansen 2011–2012. A temporary fuel duty freeze in 2014–2015 was later partially reversed. The pattern of temporary measures becoming permanent political commitments is documented.
 
@@ -2022,7 +1984,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Precedent 4: Interpellation Offensive as Pre-Election Signal (2013–2014)
+### Precedent 4: Interpellation Offensive as Pre-Election Signal (2013–2014)
 
 **Parallel**: S filed a similar concentrated interpellation campaign in 2013–2014 targeting the Alliansregering in the months before the 2014 election, including specific accountability questions about fiscal priorities and social spending. S won the 2014 election.
 
@@ -2037,7 +1999,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Historical Pattern Summary
+### Historical Pattern Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -2060,8 +2022,7 @@ timeline
 **Analyst Note**: The 2022 precedent (S LAS dual-track → election defeat) is the most structurally similar to today's pattern. Whether the outcome repeats depends on whether S can disambiguate the message before September 2026. Admiralty: [B3].
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Implementation Feasibility
@@ -2069,7 +2030,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Matrix
+### Feasibility Matrix
 
 | Measure | dok_id | Legal basis | Timeline | Risk | Pass-through risk |
 |---------|--------|-------------|----------|------|------------------|
@@ -2082,9 +2043,9 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Delivery Risk Assessment
+### Delivery Risk Assessment
 
-### HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut
+#### HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut
 
 **Legal status**: ENACTED 2026-04-22 — legally effective. No remaining approval hurdles.
 
@@ -2097,7 +2058,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 **WEP on effective delivery**: It is **Likely** [60–70%] that fuel stations will pass through at least 70% of the reduction. It is **Unlikely** [20–30%] that the full 82 öre/liter reduction will be consistently visible at the pump.
 
-### HD03100 — Vårproposition
+#### HD03100 — Vårproposition
 
 **Legal status**: Government bill — now in Riksdag budget committee process.
 
@@ -2105,7 +2066,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 **Key risk**: Post-election government may revise HD03100 framework. Pre-election budget commitments are not binding on successor governments.
 
-### HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — Grundlag Reform
+#### HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — Grundlag Reform
 
 **Legal status**: Stage 1 (first-reading) — 2 of 2 required Riksdag decisions needed.
 
@@ -2115,7 +2076,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Administrative Capacity Assessment
+### Administrative Capacity Assessment
 
 | Implementing body | Measure | Capacity status |
 |------------------|---------|-----------------|
@@ -2126,15 +2087,14 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Summary
+### Feasibility Summary
 
 **HD01FiU48 is administratively straightforward** — the primary risk is consumer pass-through. **Grundlag reform is feasible but election-dependent** — high political risk despite legal clarity. **Vårproposition is sound framework** but pre-election in nature.
 
 **Admiralty overall**: [A1] for legal status, [B3] for effective delivery confidence.
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: ACH matrix + Red Team challenge
@@ -2142,9 +2102,9 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Competing Hypotheses (ACH Matrix)
+### Competing Hypotheses (ACH Matrix)
 
-### Hypothesis H1: S's HD01FiU48 Ja Vote was Genuine Policy Support
+#### Hypothesis H1: S's HD01FiU48 Ja Vote was Genuine Policy Support
 
 **Claim**: The Socialdemokraterna voted for HD01FiU48 because they genuinely believe fuel tax relief is the right policy response to high energy costs — not as a purely electoral calculation.
 
@@ -2162,7 +2122,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-### Hypothesis H2: S Accountability Offensive is Opportunistic, Not Strategically Coordinated
+#### Hypothesis H2: S Accountability Offensive is Opportunistic, Not Strategically Coordinated
 
 **Claim**: The 5 interpellations in 48 hours are not a coordinated strategy but individually motivated by specific constituency or committee interests.
 
@@ -2180,7 +2140,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-### Hypothesis H3: HD01FiU48 Budget Deterioration is Fiscally Manageable Without Election-Year Risk
+#### Hypothesis H3: HD01FiU48 Budget Deterioration is Fiscally Manageable Without Election-Year Risk
 
 **Claim**: The 4.1 GSEK budget deterioration from HD01FiU48 is easily absorbed within Sweden's fiscal framework and poses no meaningful election-year risk.
 
@@ -2199,7 +2159,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Red Team Challenge
+### Red Team Challenge
 
 **Red Team position**: The mainstream analysis overestimates the significance of S's dual-track strategy. From a voter perspective, most Swedish citizens do not follow parliamentary procedural details (committee motions vs. chamber votes). S will simply claim credit for the relief in the election campaign, and voters will not know about the counter-motion.
 
@@ -2213,7 +2173,7 @@ It does NOT matter for the median voter unfamiliar with committee motions. This
 
 ---
 
-## Rejected Alternative Hypotheses
+### Rejected Alternative Hypotheses
 
 | Hypothesis | Why Rejected |
 |------------|-------------|
@@ -2222,8 +2182,7 @@ It does NOT matter for the median voter unfamiliar with committee motions. This
 | SD voted Ja on HD01FiU48 under government pressure rather than genuine support | SD consistently supports fuel cost relief; no evidence of coercion |
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: political-classification-guide.md (7-dimension classification per document)
@@ -2231,7 +2190,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Classification Overview
+### Classification Overview
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
@@ -2245,7 +2204,7 @@ pie title Document Priority Tier Distribution
 
 ---
 
-## 7-Dimension Classification Per Key Document
+### 7-Dimension Classification Per Key Document
 
 | dok_id | Policy | Party | Stage | Impact | Urgency | Scope | GDPR basis | Tier |
 |--------|--------|-------|-------|--------|---------|-------|------------|------|
@@ -2264,7 +2223,7 @@ pie title Document Priority Tier Distribution
 
 ---
 
-## Retention and Access Classification
+### Retention and Access Classification
 
 | Classification | Count | Access | Retention |
 |----------------|-------|--------|-----------|
@@ -2275,8 +2234,7 @@ pie title Document Priority Tier Distribution
 **GDPR Note**: All documents analysed are publicly filed parliamentary documents. Political opinions expressed therein are Art. 9(2)(e) (manifestly made public by data subjects). Analysis products are Art. 9(2)(g) (substantial public interest — democratic accountability). No personal profiling beyond publicly declared political positions.
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
 **Framework**: Tier-C cross-type synthesis + structural-metadata-methodology.md
@@ -2285,7 +2243,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry
+### Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry
 
 | Folder | Path | Key Artifact | Status |
 |--------|------|-------------|--------|
@@ -2297,7 +2255,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Document Cross-Reference Matrix
+### Document Cross-Reference Matrix
 
 | dok_id | type | committeeReports | interpellations | motions | propositions | evening-analysis |
 |--------|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
@@ -2320,31 +2278,31 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Thematic Cross-Reference
+### Thematic Cross-Reference
 
-### Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary thread)
+#### Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary thread)
 - **propositions**: HD03100 (vårproposition), HD03236 (extra budget source)
 - **committeeReports**: HD01FiU48 (enacted)
 - **motions**: HD024082/092/098 (S climate counter-positions)
 - **interpellations**: HD10442-HD10446 (accountability response)
 - **Evening synthesis**: All 4 pillars converge → cross-party fiscal supermajority + S dual-track is today's main story
 
-### Theme 2: Constitutional (Secondary thread)
+#### Theme 2: Constitutional (Secondary thread)
 - **committeeReports**: HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — two simultaneous grundlag first readings (KU)
 - **Evening synthesis**: constitutional reform at Stage 1; cross-reference with election 2026 analysis
 
-### Theme 3: International/Ukraine (Tertiary thread)
+#### Theme 3: International/Ukraine (Tertiary thread)
 - **propositions**: HD03232 + HD03231 — Sweden joins Ukraine accountability frameworks
 - **Evening synthesis**: cross-reference with forward-indicators.md
 
-### Theme 4: Opposition Accountability Offensive (Quaternary thread)
+#### Theme 4: Opposition Accountability Offensive (Quaternary thread)
 - **interpellations**: HD10442-HD10446 — S targets Svantesson + housing/social ministers
 - **evening-analysis**: synthesis of coordinated opposition strategy
 - **No sibling overlap**: interpellations folder is the sole data source
 
 ---
 
-## PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)
+### PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)
 
 | Prior PIR (2026-04-21) | Status Today | Current Evening Assessment |
 |------------------------|-------------|---------------------------|
@@ -2357,8 +2315,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 | PIR-7 Election campaign postures | CRITICAL ADVANCE | S dual-track strategy + interpellation offensive = multi-vector campaign evidence |
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Reflection ID**: MR-2026-04-22-EVE001
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
@@ -2367,7 +2324,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Evidence Sufficiency Assessment
+### Evidence Sufficiency Assessment
 
 **Total documents in scope**: 56 (20 primary + 36 via cross-reference)
 **Documents with full text**: 20 (HD01FiU48, HD10442-HD10446, HD03100, HD03232, HD03240, others via sibling folders)
@@ -2380,7 +2337,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Distribution
+### Confidence Distribution
 
 | Level | Count | % | Implication |
 |-------|-------|---|-------------|
@@ -2393,7 +2350,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Source Diversity Assessment
+### Source Diversity Assessment
 
 | Source type | Count | % |
 |-------------|-------|---|
@@ -2406,7 +2363,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Party Neutrality Arithmetic
+### Party Neutrality Arithmetic
 
 | Party coverage | Documents citing | Narratives per party |
 |----------------|-----------------|---------------------|
@@ -2423,7 +2380,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## ICD 203 Compliance Audit
+### ICD 203 Compliance Audit
 
 | ICD 203 Standard | Status | Evidence |
 |-----------------|--------|----------|
@@ -2439,26 +2396,25 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle
+### Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle
 
-### Improvement 1: Real-time vote data integration
+#### Improvement 1: Real-time vote data integration
 The FiU48 vote record (CE14CCEF) was available but grouped party-level data was API-sync-delayed. Future runs should wait 2 hours post-vote for party-level data before finalising significance scoring. This would improve confidence from [B2] to [A1] on vote analysis.
 
-### Improvement 2: IP scheduling database
+#### Improvement 2: IP scheduling database
 Interpellation scheduling (when debates occur) is critical for assessing accountability risk timelines. A persistent PIR tracker mapping IP dok_id → scheduled debate date would improve lead-time on ministerial accountability scenarios. Recommend populating analysis/data/ip-tracker.json with scheduled dates.
 
-### Improvement 3: Cross-type synthesis completeness
+#### Improvement 3: Cross-type synthesis completeness
 Today's sibling folders (committeeReports, interpellations, motions, propositions) each had 9 of 23 required artifacts — partial analyses. Evening analysis had to reconstruct full intelligence from these partial inputs. If sibling folder analyses were complete (all 23), evening synthesis quality would improve significantly. Flag incomplete sibling analyses as a data quality issue.
 
-### Improvement 4: WEP language consistency
+#### Improvement 4: WEP language consistency
 Some artifacts used "probable" (not in canonical WEP 7-band list per political-style-guide.md). Canonical WEP bands are: Almost certain / Very likely / Likely / Roughly even / Unlikely / Very unlikely / Remote. Replace "probable" with "Likely" in next cycle.
 
-### Improvement 5: SAT catalog compliance
+#### Improvement 5: SAT catalog compliance
 This run used: Scenario Analysis, ACH, Red Team, Hypothesis Testing, SWOT, TOWS, Evidence Scoring. Total: 7 techniques. Target: ≥10 named SAT techniques. Add for next cycle: Structured Self-Critique, Key Assumptions Check (explicit table), Indicators and Warning analysis, Premortem Analysis.
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Workflow**: news-evening-analysis
 **Run ID**: 24808228341
@@ -2469,7 +2425,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
 **Days to Election**: ~144 days (September 13, 2026)
 
-## MCP Server Status
+### MCP Server Status
 
 | Server | Status | Note |
 |--------|--------|------|
@@ -2477,7 +2433,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | world-bank | ✅ Available | Sweden GDP/inflation data |
 | scb | ✅ Available | Statistics Sweden |
 
-## Reference Analyses (Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis)
+### Reference Analyses (Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis)
 
 | Folder | Articles | Key dok_ids | Status |
 |--------|----------|-------------|--------|
@@ -2487,7 +2443,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/ | 15 docs | HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03240, HD03232 | ✅ Full |
 | analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/ | Partial | Prior cycle reference | ✅ Available |
 
-## Consolidated Documents for Today's Evening Analysis
+### Consolidated Documents for Today's Evening Analysis
 
 | dok_id | Title | Type | Source folder | Full-text | DIW |
 |--------|-------|------|---------------|-----------|-----|
@@ -2512,7 +2468,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03239 | Vindkraft i kommuner | prop | propositions | ✅ | 7.0 |
 | HD01CU28 | Register för bostadsrätter | bet | committeeReports | ✅ | 7.0 |
 
-## Economic Context
+### Economic Context
 
 - Sweden GDP growth 2024: 0.82% (World Bank)
 - Sweden GDP growth 2023: -0.20%
@@ -2520,8 +2476,57 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - Sweden Unemployment 2025: 8.7%
 - Fiscal impact HD01FiU48: −4.1 billion SEK budget balance
 
-## Notes
+### Notes
 
 - API returned 0 direct hits for 2026-04-22 in real-time search; all data sourced from sibling folder analyses produced during today's earlier workflow runs
 - Cross-type synthesis integrates 56 distinct documents across 4 article types
 - Prior cycle PIRs read from analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/ for continuity
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024090-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024092-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024095-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024097-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024098-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03232-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03239-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03240-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD0399-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10442-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10443-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10444-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10445-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10446-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/article.md
index c4cd1d3493..3fdd9e3f0d 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-22
 subfolder: realtime-2338
 slug: 2026-04-22-realtime-2338
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.904Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.704Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,12 +26,11 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 The Swedish Riksdag enters the final pre-election legislative sprint with three simultaneous breaking-news vectors: (1) the Social Democrats have launched a coordinated four-interpellation accountability offensive against Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) and coalition partners on 2026-04-22, targeting weaknesses in labour, housing, social welfare and civil administration ahead of September 2026 election; (2) the extra supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes was adopted by Riksdag on 2026-04-21, with opposition split along climate-economic lines; and (3) a cluster of substantive propositions on energy, forestry, justice and Ukraine diplomacy signals the Kristersson government's accelerating legislative agenda in the final session before dissolution.
 
@@ -39,7 +38,7 @@ The S accountability offensive — three separate interpellations targeting Fina
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Editorial decision**: Whether to cover the S accountability offensive as a unified political story (coordinated attack on Svantesson) or as separate interpellations — the unified framing is analytically stronger.
 2. **Monitoring priority**: Whether to escalate tracking on the employer contribution exploitation case (HD10444) given the Aftonbladet reporting connection — HIGH priority recommended.
@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ The S accountability offensive — three separate interpellations targeting Fina
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ 60-Second Read
+### ⚡ 60-Second Read
 
 - **S triple-strike on Svantesson** [B2]: HD10444 (employer contribution abuse), HD10442 (eating disorder court case), HD10446 (false death declarations) — three vectors simultaneously
 - **HD10445 housing**: S targets government failure on pre-emption rights for key properties in Stockholm suburbs (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) — segregation policy vector [B2]
@@ -58,17 +57,17 @@ The S accountability offensive — three separate interpellations targeting Fina
 
 ---
 
-## 📅 Top Forward Trigger
+### 📅 Top Forward Trigger
 **Watch 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05**: Ministerial answers to the four interpellations will be debated in the Riksdag chamber. Svantesson's responses to HD10442 (eating disorder court case) and HD10444 (employer contributions) carry the highest media-volatility risk. A single factually contested answer could become the week's dominant political story ahead of the June budget debate.
 
 ---
 
-## 🔍 Confidence Label
+### 🔍 Confidence Label
 **Overall assessment confidence**: HIGH [B2] — based on direct MCP retrieval of parliamentary documents and cross-reference with today's sibling analysis folders (propositions, motions, committeeReports, interpellations).
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Intelligence Landscape Map
+### 📊 Intelligence Landscape Map
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -104,8 +103,7 @@ flowchart TD
 ```
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-22 | **Subfolder**: realtime-2338
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Methodology**: synthesis-methodology.md, ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v6.4
@@ -113,7 +111,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Lead Story Decision
+### 🎯 Lead Story Decision
 
 **PRIMARY STORY**: Social Democrats launch coordinated four-interpellation accountability offensive against the Kristersson coalition on 2026-04-22, with three interpellations targeting Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) in a single day. The employer contribution exploitation case (HD10444) — based on Aftonbladet reporting that retailers diverted the youth employment tax relief into profits rather than new jobs — delivers the sharpest fiscal-policy attack vector ahead of the September 2026 election.
 
@@ -123,7 +121,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking
+### 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Document | D | I | W | DIW | Tier |
 |------|--------|----------|---|---|---|-----|------|
@@ -140,25 +138,25 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture
+### 🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture
 
 The realtime intelligence picture on the evening of 2026-04-22 shows **four concurrent political dynamics**:
 
-### 1. Pre-Election Accountability War (CRITICAL)
+#### 1. Pre-Election Accountability War (CRITICAL)
 Socialdemokraterna are executing a deliberate multi-vector ministerial accountability strategy. The selection of three interpellations targeting Svantesson — the government's most prominent fiscal figure — reflects S research into her past statements on employer contributions (HD10444: Aftonbladet confirmed 20+ retailers diverted the relief), the eating disorder court case (HD10442: court vindication of Region Stockholm), and the Skatteverket false death registration failures (HD10446). Admiralty source: [A1] — all from riksdagen.se direct API.
 
-### 2. Budget Enacted — Relief Narrative Active (HIGH)
+#### 2. Budget Enacted — Relief Narrative Active (HIGH)
 The coalition secured passage of HD01FiU48 despite cross-party opposition, establishing a "government cuts your fuel costs" narrative for the summer driving season (1 May–30 September 2026). S/V/MP objection through motions is now **overridden** — the relief is law. [A1]
 
-### 3. Legislative Sprint — Energy and Security Cluster (HIGH)
+#### 3. Legislative Sprint — Energy and Security Cluster (HIGH)
 The April 14–16 proposition cluster reveals a policy agenda accelerating toward the election: energy laws, forestry liberalisation, arms regulation, Ukraine diplomacy, and youth crime — all areas with documented electoral salience. [A2]
 
-### 4. Opposition Fragmentation (MEDIUM)
+#### 4. Opposition Fragmentation (MEDIUM)
 On deportation (HD024095) and medical care (HD024094), Centerpartiet is attempting to amend rather than reject government proposals — signalling the C's continued attempt to position itself as a responsible alternative at the political centre rather than aligning with S/V/MP on full rejection. [B2]
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context
 
 **Collection method**: riksdag-regering MCP server (live, verified at 23:38Z). Source authority [A] for all riksdagen.se-origin documents. Completeness [2] — documents cover today's interpellations fully; committee betänkanden covers last 5 days; propositions from past 8 days. Cross-reference with four sibling analysis folders (propositions, motions, committeeReports, interpellations) from today's analysis/daily/2026-04-22/ tree.
 
@@ -186,75 +184,74 @@ quadrantChart
     style HD10443 fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 - **SEO title** (EN): "Sweden's Social Democrats Triple-Target Finance Minister Svantesson in Pre-Election Parliamentary Offensive"
 - **SEO title** (SV): "S triplerar attack mot finansminister Svantesson i förvalspolitisk offensiv"
 - **Meta description** (EN): "Four interpellations filed on 22 April 2026 target Finance Minister Svantesson and coalition partners over employer tax abuse, social dumping, housing policy and civil registry failures."
 - **Slug**: breaking-2026-04-22
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Sources**: Riksdag API [A1], Sibling Analysis [A2]
 **Classification**: Public | **Confidence**: See per-KJ labels | **Cycle**: Realtime-2338
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### KJ-1 (Confidence: HIGH — Likely [WEP Level 3/7])
+#### KJ-1 (Confidence: HIGH — Likely [WEP Level 3/7])
 **The Social Democrats have launched a coordinated parliamentary accountability campaign targeting Finance Minister Svantesson as the primary vector for undermining the Tidö coalition's fiscal competence narrative ahead of Election 2026.**
 
 *Basis*: 4 interpellations filed on 2026-04-22 by S MPs, 3 directly targeting Svantesson (HD10442 eating disorder court case, HD10444 employer contributions to social dumping, and one other); the cluster follows a pre-existing HD10442 filed 2026-04-21; the accountability emphasis on Svantesson's stewardship of tax-financed employer contributions aligns with S's positioning as the defender of the Swedish welfare model against labour market exploitation. Source authority: [A1] riksdagen.se API direct retrieval.
 
 *Counter-indicator to watch*: If S files no further interpellations targeting coalition ministers in the 2026-04-23 to 2026-05-15 window, the campaign was a one-day tactical burst rather than a sustained strategy.
 
-### KJ-2 (Confidence: MODERATE — Roughly even [WEP Level 4/7])
+#### KJ-2 (Confidence: MODERATE — Roughly even [WEP Level 4/7])
 **The extra budget fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48, effective 2026-05-01) will deliver a visible but small consumer benefit that serves both an electoral signalling function and a legitimate emergency relief function; it is unlikely to produce decisive electoral movement but will feature prominently in the coalition's May 2026 campaign messaging.**
 
 *Basis*: FiU48 adopted by Riksdag 2026-04-21 with S/V/MP voting against (per opposition motions HD024082, HD024092, HD024098). The 82 öre/litre cut is modest but politically legible. International comparator (Germany Tankrabatt 2022) shows such measures have short political shelf-lives but serve as credibility-building signals of government responsiveness. Confidence limited to MODERATE because consumer response is not yet observable [B2].
 
-### KJ-3 (Confidence: HIGH — Almost certain [WEP Level 1/7])
+#### KJ-3 (Confidence: HIGH — Almost certain [WEP Level 1/7])
 **Sweden's legislative output for spring 2026 (propositions cluster: electricity system, wind power, environmental permitting, Ukraine tribunals, youth offenders, data interoperability) demonstrates an active pre-election legislative sprint by the Tidö coalition with a legacy-building objective.**
 
 *Basis*: 8+ propositions submitted April 13–16, 2026 across Näringsdepartementet, Klimat- och näringsdepartementet, Utrikesdepartementet, Justitiedepartementet — covering cross-cutting domains. This density of legislative activity in the final legislative weeks before an autumn election is consistent with "legislative sprint" patterns identified in prior Swedish election cycles. Source: [A1] riksdagen.se API direct retrieval.
 
 ---
 
-## Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)
+### Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)
 
-### PIR-1 (STANDING): Government Stability
+#### PIR-1 (STANDING): Government Stability
 **Question**: Will the Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L) maintain cohesion through the September 2026 election?
 **Current assessment**: STABLE with LOW-MODERATE attrition risk. The fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) passed with all four coalition parties supporting. No visible internal split on the accountancy interpellations. [B2]
 
-### PIR-2 (STANDING): Election 2026 Forecast
+#### PIR-2 (STANDING): Election 2026 Forecast
 **Question**: Which bloc will form government after September 2026?
 **Current assessment**: UNCERTAIN — polling remains within margin of error. S accountability offensive (HD10444 et al.) is the current best signal of whether S can narrow the gap. [B2]
 
-### PIR-3 (ACTIVE): Svantesson Accountability Track
+#### PIR-3 (ACTIVE): Svantesson Accountability Track
 **Question**: Will the coordinated interpellation campaign produce a factual error by Svantesson that triggers a KU review petition?
 **Current assessment**: WATCH. Debate answers expected 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05. Gate indicator: KU petition filed by S within 14 days of debate. [B2]
 
-### PIR-4 (ACTIVE): Fuel Tax Electoral Impact
+#### PIR-4 (ACTIVE): Fuel Tax Electoral Impact
 **Question**: Does the 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut move consumer sentiment / government approval?
 **Current assessment**: UNKNOWN. Observable from 2026-05-02 pump price data. [not yet rated]
 
-### PIR-5 (ACTIVE): Constitutional Amendment Trajectory
+#### PIR-5 (ACTIVE): Constitutional Amendment Trajectory
 **Question**: What are the HD01KU33/32 constitutional amendments about and do they affect electoral rules?
 **Current assessment**: FLAG for full-text review. Currently title-only assessment [B3].
 
-### PIR-6 (STANDING): Ukraine Diplomatic-Legal Position
+#### PIR-6 (STANDING): Ukraine Diplomatic-Legal Position
 **Question**: How does Sweden's Ukraine tribunal package (HD03231/232) affect Sweden's position within EU diplomatic consensus?
 **Current assessment**: CONSISTENT — both propositions passed through normal procedures; no breakaway signals. [A2]
 
-### PIR-7 (STANDING): Energy Security Legislative Timetable
+#### PIR-7 (STANDING): Energy Security Legislative Timetable
 **Question**: When will the electricity system, wind power, and environmental permitting propositions (HD03240/239/238) receive committee reports?
 **Current assessment**: Committee review phase (NäringsU, MiljöU) expected May–June 2026. [B2]
 
 ---
 
-## Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)
+### Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)
 
 | PIR inherited | Source folder | Resolution status | This-cycle update |
 |--------------|--------------|------------------|-------------------|
@@ -265,7 +262,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Calibration Summary
+### Confidence Calibration Summary
 
 | KJ | WEP Band | Admiralty | Note |
 |----|---------|-----------|------|
@@ -274,15 +271,14 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 | KJ-3 | Almost certain | A1 | Direct API count of propositions submitted |
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Methodology**: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md, significance-scoring.md
 **Classification**: Public | **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
 
 ---
 
-## Scoring Framework
+### Scoring Framework
 - **D** (Depth/Impact): 1–10 scale on policy substance and magnitude
 - **I** (Intelligence Value): 1–10 scale on analytical/predictive utility
 - **W** (Urgency/Timeliness): 1–10 scale on time-sensitivity
@@ -290,7 +286,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Ranked Significance Table
+### 1. Ranked Significance Table
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title | D | I | W | **DIW** | Tier | Admiralty |
 |------|--------|-------|---|---|---|---------|------|-----------|
@@ -312,7 +308,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Sensitivity Analysis
+### 2. Sensitivity Analysis
 
 **High-sensitivity items (DIW ≥ 8.0 with electoral impact)**:
 - HD01FiU48 [A1]: Enacted — fiscal relief narrative is now law. Electoral impact: S/V/MP LOSE this battle in 2026 pre-election. Government gains summer relief narrative.
@@ -324,7 +320,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## 3. DIW Rank Diagram
+### 3. DIW Rank Diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 gantt
@@ -352,7 +348,7 @@ gantt
 
 ---
 
-## 4. Top Forward Triggers (Significance Decay)
+### 4. Top Forward Triggers (Significance Decay)
 
 | dok_id | Significance Decay Date | Trigger Event |
 |--------|------------------------|---------------|
@@ -363,21 +359,20 @@ gantt
 | HD03240 | 2026-06-01 | El-system law enters parliamentary committee |
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Expected Framing by Political Actor
+### Expected Framing by Political Actor
 
-### Government/Coalition Framing
+#### Government/Coalition Framing
 **Primary frame**: "Delivery-focused government protecting Swedish households" — HD01FiU48 fuel cut as headline, energy legislation as long-term security
 **Supporting narrative**: "S is engaging in pre-election theatre while we govern"
 **Vulnerability**: HD10444 employer contributions to social dumping — if Svantesson cannot provide factual rebuttal, "government enables wage exploitation" frame becomes credible
 **Tone**: "Responsible fiscal management, record delivery"
 **Expected media vehicles**: Moderate sympathetic outlets (Expressen, SvD), governmental press conferences
 
-### S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing
+#### S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing
 **Primary frame**: "Coalition ministers fail to protect Swedish workers and vulnerable citizens"
 **Sub-frames**:
 - HD10444: "Svantesson enables tax-funded social dumping" (employer contribution angle)
@@ -387,23 +382,23 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Tone**: Accountability, moral outrage (carefully calibrated to avoid "too strident")
 **Expected media vehicles**: Aftonbladet, LO-Tidningen, S-aligned regional press
 
-### SD (Sverigedemokraterna) Framing
+#### SD (Sverigedemokraterna) Framing
 **Primary frame**: Unlikely to prominently cover S interpellations (different accountability axis). Will focus on fuel tax cut SUCCESS (populist energy nationalism) and youth crime reform (HD03246).
 **Expected media vehicles**: Avpixlat-adjacent outlets, social media
 
-### MP (Miljöpartiet) Framing
+#### MP (Miljöpartiet) Framing
 **Primary frame**: "Fuel tax cut is climate regression; coalition abandons Sweden's climate commitments"
 **Sub-frame**: Energy legislation (HD03239 vindkraft) as insufficient half-measure
 **Expected media vehicles**: Miljömagasinet, urban progressive press
 
-### V (Vänsterpartiet) Framing
+#### V (Vänsterpartiet) Framing
 **Primary frame**: "Government cuts fuel tax instead of investing in public transport — wrong priorities for working class"
 **Sub-frame**: Social dumping (aligns with HD10443/HD10444) — V's traditional labour market accountability frame
 **Expected media vehicles**: Flamman, Proletären, social media
 
 ---
 
-## Expected Mainstream Media Framing (Swedish Press Outlets)
+### Expected Mainstream Media Framing (Swedish Press Outlets)
 
 | Outlet | Expected Frame | Based on past coverage patterns |
 |--------|---------------|--------------------------------|
@@ -415,7 +410,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Framing Risk Matrix
+### Framing Risk Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -435,14 +430,13 @@ quadrantChart
 ```
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
+### 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
 
-### Lens 1: Government Coalition (Tidö Bloc)
+#### Lens 1: Government Coalition (Tidö Bloc)
 
 | Actor | Role | Impact | Position |
 |-------|------|--------|----------|
@@ -453,7 +447,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Johan Britz (KD/L) | Climate & Energy Minister | MEDIUM | HD03240 (electricity laws), HD03239 (wind power) are his core delivery |
 | Lotta Edholm (L) | Acting PM (April) | NEUTRAL | Signed HD03240 — positioned as energy competence |
 
-### Lens 2: Opposition Parties
+#### Lens 2: Opposition Parties
 
 | Actor | Role | Impact | Position |
 |-------|------|--------|----------|
@@ -464,7 +458,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Nooshi Dadgostar (V) | V leader | POSITIVE | V motion HD024092 positions V as climate-social alternative |
 | Janine Alm Ericson (MP) | MP HD024098 | POSITIVE | MP framing fuel cut as climate retreat |
 
-### Lens 3: Directly Affected Citizens/Groups
+#### Lens 3: Directly Affected Citizens/Groups
 
 | Group | Impact | Admiralty |
 |-------|--------|-----------|
@@ -474,7 +468,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Municipal welfare recipients (social dumping victims) | NEGATIVE (transferral without consent documented) | [B2] HD10443 |
 | ~30 citizens/year wrongly declared dead | NEGATIVE (Skatteverket failure ongoing) | [A2] HD10446 |
 
-### Lens 4: Institutional Actors
+#### Lens 4: Institutional Actors
 
 | Institution | Position | Stakes |
 |-------------|----------|--------|
@@ -484,7 +478,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | JO (Justitieombudsman) | Potential | Social dumping (HD10443) could attract JO complaint if interpellation reveals systematic violations |
 | Lantmäteriet | Active | HD01CU27 (identity at land registration) strengthens registration controls |
 
-### Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector
+#### Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector
 
 | Sector | Impact | Admiralty |
 |--------|--------|-----------|
@@ -494,7 +488,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Forestry/Timber sector | POSITIVE (HD03242 clearer active forestry rules) | [A1] |
 | Arms manufacturers | MONITORING (HD024091/096 motions; policy not changed) | [B2] |
 
-### Lens 6: International/EU Context
+#### Lens 6: International/EU Context
 
 | Actor | Impact | Admiralty |
 |-------|--------|-----------|
@@ -504,7 +498,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Influence Network Map
+### Influence Network Map
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -532,40 +526,39 @@ flowchart TD
 ```
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Indicator Framework
+### Indicator Framework
 ≥10 dated indicators across 4 time horizons (Near, Short, Medium, Long)
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 1: Near-Term (0–14 days: 2026-04-22 to 2026-05-06)
+### Horizon 1: Near-Term (0–14 days: 2026-04-22 to 2026-05-06)
 
-### FI-1: Svantesson interpellation debate answers
+#### FI-1: Svantesson interpellation debate answers
 **Watch date**: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 **Indicator**: Did Svantesson provide factual, specific answers to HD10444 (employer contributions) and HD10442 (eating disorder court case)?
 **Green signal**: Detailed factual answer with Finansinspektionen/Tillväxtverket data → narrative containment
 **Red signal**: Vague or deflective answer → S picks up 2-4 points in next poll, KU petition likely
 **Source**: riksdagen.se anföranden, SVT Nyheter coverage
 
-### FI-2: HD10446 false death declaration debate
+#### FI-2: HD10446 false death declaration debate
 **Watch date**: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 **Indicator**: Carlson (KD) provides government's account of Skatteverket/Socialstyrelsen coordination on false death records
 **Green signal**: Documented remediation of process → issue closed
 **Red signal**: No systemic fix documented → JO complaint risk [B2]
 **Source**: riksdagen.se anföranden
 
-### FI-3: HD01FiU48 pump price visibility
+#### FI-3: HD01FiU48 pump price visibility
 **Watch date**: 2026-05-02 to 2026-05-05
 **Indicator**: Do major Swedish fuel retailers (Preem, Circle K, OKQ8) publish pump price reduction reflecting 82 öre tax cut?
 **Green signal**: Visible pump price drop → government can claim HD01FiU48 impact
 **Red signal**: No visible drop → opposition "fake relief" narrative activated
 **Source**: Fuel retailer price data (public websites)
 
-### FI-4: New S/V/MP interpellations after HD10444 cycle
+#### FI-4: New S/V/MP interpellations after HD10444 cycle
 **Watch date**: 2026-04-23 to 2026-05-06
 **Indicator**: How many further accountability interpellations filed by S between now and May 6?
 **Green signal (for coalition)**: 0–1 further interpellations → one-day tactical burst
@@ -574,23 +567,23 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 2: Short-Term (2–6 weeks: 2026-05-06 to 2026-06-03)
+### Horizon 2: Short-Term (2–6 weeks: 2026-05-06 to 2026-06-03)
 
-### FI-5: Energy legislation committee reports (HD03240/239/238)
+#### FI-5: Energy legislation committee reports (HD03240/239/238)
 **Watch date**: 2026-05-15 to 2026-06-15
 **Indicator**: Do NäringsU and MiljöU publish positive committee reports enabling Riksdag votes before summer recess?
 **Green signal**: All three approved → coalition pre-election legacy narrative
 **Red signal**: One or more deferred to autumn → "unfinished business" opposition attack
 **Source**: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=NU,MJU)
 
-### FI-6: Youth offender reform (HD03246) committee report
+#### FI-6: Youth offender reform (HD03246) committee report
 **Watch date**: 2026-05-30 to 2026-06-10
 **Indicator**: Does JuU publish committee report on unga lagöverträdare reform?
 **Green signal**: Approved with broad support → bipartisan crime policy achievement
 **Red signal**: S/V/MP dissents → crime policy dividing line in election campaign
 **Source**: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=JuU)
 
-### FI-7: Polling movement post-interpellation cycle
+#### FI-7: Polling movement post-interpellation cycle
 **Watch date**: 2026-05-10 to 2026-05-20
 **Indicator**: Do Novus/Ipsos/SIFO polls show S moving above 30% following interpellation cycle?
 **Green signal (for S)**: S polling >30% → accountability campaign gaining electoral traction
@@ -599,23 +592,23 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 3: Medium-Term (6 weeks–3 months: 2026-06-03 to 2026-09-01)
+### Horizon 3: Medium-Term (6 weeks–3 months: 2026-06-03 to 2026-09-01)
 
-### FI-8: C (Centerpartiet) coalition signal
+#### FI-8: C (Centerpartiet) coalition signal
 **Watch date**: 2026-06-15 to 2026-08-01
 **Indicator**: Does C party leader (Muharrem Demirok) state a preference for post-election coalition direction?
 **Green signal (for Tidö)**: C signals it will prioritise governing with M over S bloc
 **Green signal (for S bloc)**: C signals openness to S-led government
 **Source**: Press interviews, SVT/SR Almedalen declarations (Almedalen late June)
 
-### FI-9: L (Liberalerna) threshold poll
+#### FI-9: L (Liberalerna) threshold poll
 **Watch date**: 2026-06-01 to 2026-09-13
 **Indicator**: Does L consistently poll above 4% in ≥3 successive polls?
 **Green signal**: L above 4% → Tidö coalition arithmetic stable
 **Red signal**: L polling below 4% in ≥2 polls → threshold risk scenario activated
 **Source**: Published poll aggregates
 
-### FI-10: Ukraine tribunal legislation (HD03231/232) committee report
+#### FI-10: Ukraine tribunal legislation (HD03231/232) committee report
 **Watch date**: 2026-05-20 to 2026-06-15
 **Indicator**: Does UtU publish report approving Ukraine tribunal framework propositions?
 **Green signal**: Approved → Sweden's Ukraine transitional justice role confirmed
@@ -623,21 +616,21 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 4: Long-Term (3+ months: 2026-09-01 onward)
+### Horizon 4: Long-Term (3+ months: 2026-09-01 onward)
 
-### FI-11: Election 2026 result — Riksdag composition
+#### FI-11: Election 2026 result — Riksdag composition
 **Watch date**: 2026-09-13
 **Indicator**: Which bloc achieves majority (175 seats)?
 **Source**: Swedish Election Authority (Valmyndigheten)
 
-### FI-12: HD01KU33/32 constitutional second reading
+#### FI-12: HD01KU33/32 constitutional second reading
 **Watch date**: 2026-10-01 to 2027-03-01
 **Indicator**: Does the newly constituted Riksdag (post-election) advance KU33/32 to second reading and approval?
 **Source**: riksdagen.se post-election session documents
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Indicator Dashboard
+### Forward Indicator Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 gantt
@@ -662,17 +655,16 @@ gantt
 ```
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Framework
+### Scenario Framework
 Three scenarios for the political trajectory of the S accountability offensive and its impact on Election 2026, based on the interpellation cluster filed 2026-04-22.
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 1: "Accountability Breakthrough" (Probability: 25%)
+### Scenario 1: "Accountability Breakthrough" (Probability: 25%)
 
 **Description**: Finance Minister Svantesson provides a factually challenged or evasive answer to one or more of the three interpellations targeting her (HD10444 employer contributions, HD10442 eating disorder court case, HD10446 false death declarations). Media coverage escalates to a sustained news cycle over 10+ days. KU constitutional review petition filed by S group.
 
@@ -687,7 +679,7 @@ Three scenarios for the political trajectory of the S accountability offensive a
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 2: "Narrative Containment" (Probability: 55%)
+### Scenario 2: "Narrative Containment" (Probability: 55%)
 
 **Description**: Finance Minister Svantesson delivers measured, factually defended answers to all three interpellations. Media coverage is routine (one news cycle, 3–5 days). The coalition successfully pivots to the fuel tax relief implementation (2026-05-01) and energy legislation agenda (HD03240, HD03239). The S accountability offensive scores tactical points but does not produce a sustained narrative advantage.
 
@@ -702,7 +694,7 @@ Three scenarios for the political trajectory of the S accountability offensive a
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 3: "Opposition Fragmentation" (Probability: 20%)
+### Scenario 3: "Opposition Fragmentation" (Probability: 20%)
 
 **Description**: The S accountability offensive backfires. The government points to enacted legislation (HD01FiU48 fuel relief, HD03246 youth crime, HD03244 data interoperability) as proof of delivery. Media frames the interpellations as pre-election theatre. Centerpartiet (C) explicitly distances itself from S on deportation (HD024095 amending rather than rejecting prop. 2025/26:235) — fracturing the "alternative bloc" narrative.
 
@@ -717,7 +709,7 @@ Three scenarios for the political trajectory of the S accountability offensive a
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Probability Distribution
+### Scenario Probability Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Scenario Probabilities — Realtime 2026-04-22
@@ -726,7 +718,7 @@ pie title Scenario Probabilities — Realtime 2026-04-22
     "Scenario 3: Opposition Fragmentation" : 20
 ```
 
-## Leading Indicator Matrix
+### Leading Indicator Matrix
 
 | Indicator | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Watch date |
 |-----------|------------|------------|------------|------------|
@@ -737,14 +729,13 @@ pie title Scenario Probabilities — Realtime 2026-04-22
 | Media framing (SVT/DN/Aftonbladet) | "Crisis" framing | "Politics as usual" | "S overreach" framing | Daily from 2026-04-28 |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Register (5 Dimensions × 5 Items)
+### Risk Register (5 Dimensions × 5 Items)
 
-### Dimension Definitions
+#### Dimension Definitions
 - **L**: Likelihood (1–5)
 - **I**: Impact (1–5)
 - **T**: Timing (1=imminent, 5=long-term)
@@ -753,7 +744,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk 1 — Interpellation Debate Escalation to Ministerial Crisis [HD10444/HD10442]
+### Risk 1 — Interpellation Debate Escalation to Ministerial Crisis [HD10444/HD10442]
 
 **Description**: If Finance Minister Svantesson delivers a weak or factually challenged answer to HD10444 (employer contributions) or HD10442 (eating disorders court case) during the parliamentary debate (expected 2026-04-28–05-05), the accountability story will compound. Given the court vindication of Region Stockholm in HD10442 and documented Aftonbladet evidence for HD10444, the evidentiary burden on Svantesson is high.
 
@@ -767,7 +758,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk 2 — Fuel Tax Cut Backfire: Climate Credibility Collapse [HD01FiU48]
+### Risk 2 — Fuel Tax Cut Backfire: Climate Credibility Collapse [HD01FiU48]
 
 **Description**: The enacted 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48) reduces Sweden's energy tax to EU minimum floor. If spring/summer fuel consumption increases significantly and emissions data shows uptick, the opposition will have a documented case that the government prioritised electoral cost relief over climate commitments. Particularly damaging if COP or EU review coincides.
 
@@ -779,7 +770,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk 3 — Social Dumping Litigation / Human Rights Escalation [HD10443]
+### Risk 3 — Social Dumping Litigation / Human Rights Escalation [HD10443]
 
 **Description**: Interpellation HD10443 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443) documents systematic municipal social dumping — transferring vulnerable residents between municipalities without consent. If civil society organizations or the Justitieombudsman (JO) initiate formal complaints, the government faces a dual legislative-judicial track crisis.
 
@@ -791,7 +782,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk 4 — Stockholm Housing Segregation Escalation [HD10445]
+### Risk 4 — Stockholm Housing Segregation Escalation [HD10445]
 
 **Description**: Failure to advance SOU 2024:38 recommendations on municipal pre-emption rights for key suburban properties (HD10445, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10445) creates a structural risk: if a private equity or speculative investor acquires one of the named centre properties (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) before the election, the political fallout for the government's urban policy will be acute.
 
@@ -803,7 +794,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Risk 5 — Energy Law Delay: Electricity System Legislation [HD03240]
+### Risk 5 — Energy Law Delay: Electricity System Legislation [HD03240]
 
 **Description**: The new electricity system laws (HD03240, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240, submitted 2026-04-14 by Climate and Business Dept.) are scheduled for committee review. If the legislative timeline slips past the September 2026 election, the successor government (of any composition) will inherit an unresolved electricity system framework — creating regulatory uncertainty for grid investments.
 
@@ -815,7 +806,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Cascading Risk Chains
+### Cascading Risk Chains
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -842,7 +833,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ```
 
-## Posterior Probability Estimates
+### Posterior Probability Estimates
 
 | Risk | P(Trigger Event) | P(Escalation|Trigger) | P(Full escalation) |
 |------|-----------------|----------------------|-------------------|
@@ -853,29 +844,28 @@ flowchart TD
 | R5: Energy law delay | 0.30 | 0.35 | **0.11** |
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Framework**: political-swot-framework.md
 **Classification**: Public | **Cycle**: Realtime-2338 | **Date**: 2026-04-22
 
 ---
 
-## Context
+### Context
 This SWOT analyses the **political position of the Kristersson coalition government** as revealed by the 2026-04-22 realtime parliamentary intelligence picture — specifically assessing governmental strengths, weaknesses, opposition opportunities, and external threats visible in today's documents.
 
 ---
 
-## Strengths
+### Strengths
 
-### S1 — Budget Enacted: Fiscal Relief Narrative Active [A1]
+#### S1 — Budget Enacted: Fiscal Relief Narrative Active [A1]
 The extra supplementary budget (HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48) passed on 2026-04-21 despite cross-party opposition from S, V and MP. The government now holds a concrete "we cut your fuel costs" narrative deliverable for the summer campaign: 82 öre/litre petrol cut from 1 May 2026. The cross-party majority (M+SD+KD+L+C) demonstrates the Tidö coalition's legislative operability even in contentious fiscal territory.
 
 | Evidence | Admiralty | Weight |
 |----------|-----------|--------|
 | HD01FiU48 enacted 2026-04-21; 82 öre/L cut; 4.1 GSEK fiscal impact | [A1] | 9 |
 
-### S2 — Legislative Sprint Delivering on Agenda [A1]
+#### S2 — Legislative Sprint Delivering on Agenda [A1]
 Five major propositions submitted April 14–16 (HD03240 electricity, HD03242 forestry, HD03246 youth offenders, HD03232/231 Ukraine tribunals) demonstrate legislative productivity. This counters opposition narratives of a "do-nothing government" ahead of the election. Each proposition touches a key constituency: rural (forestry), security (crime), energy (electricity/housing), international (Ukraine).
 
 | Evidence | Admiralty | Weight |
@@ -884,23 +874,23 @@ Five major propositions submitted April 14–16 (HD03240 electricity, HD03242 fo
 
 ---
 
-## Weaknesses
+### Weaknesses
 
-### W1 — Finance Minister Svantesson: Three Simultaneous Accountability Vectors [A2]
+#### W1 — Finance Minister Svantesson: Three Simultaneous Accountability Vectors [A2]
 On 2026-04-22 alone, the S opposition filed three separate interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson (HD10444 employer contributions, HD10446 false deaths, HD10442 eating disorder court case). Each targets a documented past ministerial statement that is either contested or contradicted by subsequent events. The concentration of fire on a single minister signals S has research files ready for a coordinated debate campaign.
 
 | Evidence | Admiralty | Weight |
 |----------|-----------|--------|
 | HD10444 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444), HD10446 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10446) filed 2026-04-22; HD10442 filed 2026-04-21 | [A2] | 9 |
 
-### W2 — Employer Contribution Exploitation Scandal [B2]
+#### W2 — Employer Contribution Exploitation Scandal [B2]
 The HD10444 interpellation cites an Aftonbladet investigation showing major retailers diverted the youth employment tax relief (10.9% reduction from April 2026) into profit margins rather than new jobs. Riksdagen's own legislative intent was youth job creation. If confirmed, this undermines the flagship labour market reform narrative.
 
 | Evidence | Admiralty | Weight |
 |----------|-----------|--------|
 | HD10444 text citing Aftonbladet investigation (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444); employer contribution reduction enacted April 2026 | [B2] | 8 |
 
-### W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed [B2]
+#### W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed [B2]
 Interpellation HD10443 (Peder Björk/S → Civilminister Slottner/KD) documents that vulnerable persons — social welfare recipients, asylum seekers — are being transferred between municipalities without consent, violating their right to self-determination and established residence. This represents a structural failure in the government's social welfare coordination model.
 
 | Evidence | Admiralty | Weight |
@@ -909,33 +899,33 @@ Interpellation HD10443 (Peder Björk/S → Civilminister Slottner/KD) documents
 
 ---
 
-## Opportunities
+### Opportunities
 
-### O1 — Energy Security Narrative Ownership [A1]
+#### O1 — Energy Security Narrative Ownership [A1]
 The combined passage of HD01FiU48 (fuel cut) and submission of HD03240 (new electricity system laws) and HD03239 (wind power revenue sharing) gives the government a coherent "energy security + household relief" narrative going into the election. If electricity prices remain elevated through summer 2026, the government's proactive measures will be politically valuable. Source: HD01FiU48 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48).
 
-### O2 — Ukraine Solidarity Positioning [A1]
+#### O2 — Ukraine Solidarity Positioning [A1]
 The dual Ukraine propositions (HD03231 aggression tribunal + HD03232 damage commission; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232) position Sweden in the front rank of European Ukraine support. Given Sweden's new NATO membership context, this carries strong cross-party consensus value and foreign policy credibility heading into the election.
 
-### O3 — Law and Order Narrative: Youth Offenders [A1]
+#### O3 — Law and Order Narrative: Youth Offenders [A1]
 HD03246 (Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare, Gunnar Strömmer, Justitiedept.; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03246) strengthens the government's law-and-order credentials. Youth crime is a high-salience electoral topic where the Tidö bloc has historically polled strongly, particularly among SD voters.
 
 ---
 
-## Threats
+### Threats
 
-### T1 — Coordinated S Accountability Offensive Could Dominate News Cycle [B2]
+#### T1 — Coordinated S Accountability Offensive Could Dominate News Cycle [B2]
 The four interpellations filed today (HD10444, HD10443, HD10445, HD10446) are structured to generate debate material over the next 7–10 days. If any ministerial answer is factually challenged or contradicted by subsequent evidence, the accountability story will compound. The eating disorder court case (HD10442, where Region Stockholm won 67 MSEK and vindicated its earlier statements) is the pre-existing live risk. Source: interpellations sibling analysis for HD10442.
 
-### T2 — Fuel Tax Cut: Climate Policy Credibility Damage [B2]
+#### T2 — Fuel Tax Cut: Climate Policy Credibility Damage [B2]
 The 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) aligns Sweden with EU minimum levels but is widely framed as a retreat from climate commitments. Opposition motions from MP (HD024098) and V (HD024092) have created a documented record that the government prioritised cost relief over emissions reduction. Ahead of the 2026 election, this may reduce support among climate-sensitive voters (green-conservative segment that traditionally splits between M, C, L, and MP). Source: HD024098, HD024092 (riksdagen.se).
 
-### T3 — Housing Segregation Backlash in Stockholm [B2]
+#### T3 — Housing Segregation Backlash in Stockholm [B2]
 Interpellation HD10445 (Markus Kallifatides/S → Andreas Carlson/KD) documents the government's failure to act on SOU 2024:38 recommendations for municipal pre-emption rights over key suburban properties. The affected suburbs (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) are densely populated Stockholm districts with high immigrant-background populations — this story has the potential to intersect housing policy, segregation, and social cohesion debates in a city where swing voters matter for election outcomes. Source: HD10445 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10445).
 
 ---
 
-## TOWS Matrix
+### TOWS Matrix
 
 | | Strengths | Weaknesses |
 |---|-----------|------------|
@@ -944,7 +934,7 @@ Interpellation HD10445 (Markus Kallifatides/S → Andreas Carlson/KD) documents
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-SWOT Pattern
+### Cross-SWOT Pattern
 The dominant cross-SWOT pattern is **W1/T1 convergence**: the S accountability offensive (W1) directly fuels the media-dominance threat (T1). The single most important risk management action for the coalition is **preparing airtight answers** to the HD10444 employer contribution question and the HD10442 eating disorder case before the interpellation debates scheduled 2026-04-28–05-05.
 
 ```mermaid
@@ -970,12 +960,11 @@ quadrantChart
 ```
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)
+### Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)
 
 | Threat Code | Category | Active | Severity |
 |-------------|----------|--------|----------|
@@ -989,9 +978,9 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Active Threat Profiles
+### Active Threat Profiles
 
-### PTT-1: Ministerial Accountability Offensive
+#### PTT-1: Ministerial Accountability Offensive
 **Actor**: Socialdemokraterna (S)
 **Target**: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M); Civilminister Erik Slottner (KD); Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)
 **Method**: Simultaneous interpellations (HD10444, HD10443, HD10445, HD10446) filed 2026-04-22; pre-existing HD10442 from 2026-04-21
@@ -999,21 +988,21 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Capability**: [A2] — S parliamentary group has documented research capacity; prior interpellation pattern confirms coordinated approach
 **Timing**: Activation window 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-10 (parliamentary debate scheduling)
 
-### PTT-3: Media Cycle Dominance
+#### PTT-3: Media Cycle Dominance
 **Actor**: S + sympathetic media (based on Aftonbladet reporting referenced in HD10444)
 **Target**: Government economic management narrative
 **Method**: Interpellation debates + concurrent Aftonbladet investigation provide a dual parliamentary-journalism combination
 **Goal**: Establish "government serves corporations, not workers" counter-narrative to pre-election budget relief
 **Capability**: [B2] — confirmed Aftonbladet investigation exists per HD10444 text; media cycle risk is high given political salience of employer contributions
 
-### PTT-4: Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack
+#### PTT-4: Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack
 **Actor**: S, MP, V
 **Target**: Svantesson; Kristersson government's fiscal management
 **Method**: Three interpellations + opposition motions on prop. 2025/26:236 (HD024098, HD024092)
 **Goal**: Create narrative that government fiscal policy benefits corporations and top earners, not working families
 **Evidence**: HD10444 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444); HD024098, HD024092 (riksdagen.se)
 
-### PTT-5: Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge
+#### PTT-5: Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge
 **Actor**: S
 **Target**: Civilminister Slottner (KD) + municipal welfare system
 **Method**: HD10443 social dumping interpellation; HD10445 housing segregation interpellation
@@ -1022,7 +1011,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Attack Tree
+### Attack Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1057,7 +1046,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Kill Chain (Parliamentary Accountability)
+### Kill Chain (Parliamentary Accountability)
 
 | Stage | Action | Signal | Response |
 |-------|--------|--------|----------|
@@ -1069,7 +1058,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Parliamentary Tactics)
+### MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Parliamentary Tactics)
 
 | TTP-Code | Tactic | Technique | Procedure |
 |----------|--------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -1082,15 +1071,14 @@ flowchart TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01FiU48
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01FiU48 | **Type**: Betänkande (Committee Report) | **Adopted**: 2026-04-21
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Source authority**: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 **Title**: Finansutskottets betänkande 2025/26:FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget (Vår 2026)
 **Committee**: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 **Status**: ENACTED — voted and approved by Riksdag 2026-04-21
@@ -1099,7 +1087,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 
 ---
 
-## Core Content
+### Core Content
 
 **Primary measure**: 82 öre/litre reduction in fuel excise duty (drivmedelsskatt) effective 1 May 2026. Tax rate kept at EU minimum floor. Duration: May–September 2026 (temporary, aligned with summer driving season).
 
@@ -1110,7 +1098,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 
 ---
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **Significance tier**: 🔴 CRITICAL | **DIW weight**: Highest
 
@@ -1127,29 +1115,28 @@ This is the most directly consequential enacted legislation in today's cycle. Ef
 
 ---
 
-## Admiralty Rating
+### Admiralty Rating
 - Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval — betänkande confirmed adopted
 - Fiscal figure (4.1 GSEK): [A2] — cited in committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md sibling analysis; assumed confirmed
 - Vote outcome (opposition voted against): [A2] — inferred from sibling motions analysis + interpellation context
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Watch
+### Forward Watch
 - Pump price data: 2026-05-01+ (FI-3 forward indicator)
 - Opposition communication: S campaign messaging expected immediately post-May 1
 - FiU48 as election debate touchstone: Will feature in September 2026 campaign debates as "did the cut work?" test case
 - KU review petition: If employer contribution mechanism in FiU48 is linked to HD10444 allegations, KU review is theoretically possible [B3 — speculative]
 
 ### HD10443
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10443-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10443-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10443 | **Type**: Interpellation | **Filed**: 2026-04-22
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Source authority**: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 **Title**: Interpellation to Reconciliation/Housing/Social Dumping Minister regarding inter-municipal transfer of welfare-dependent residents
 **Filed by**: S MP
 **Target minister**: Erik Slottner (KD), Minister for Civil Affairs and Housing
@@ -1157,7 +1144,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD10443-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **Significance tier**: 🟠 HIGH | **DIW weight**: High
 
@@ -1169,28 +1156,27 @@ Inter-municipal social welfare dumping (kommuner "recommending" welfare recipien
 
 ---
 
-## Admiralty Rating
+### Admiralty Rating
 - Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval of interpellation filing
 - Content: [B2] Policy substance inferred from title + governance context
 - Impact assessment: [B2] Pattern recognition from sibling analysis (interpellations/synthesis-summary.md)
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Watch
+### Forward Watch
 - Slottner's debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 - Potential follow-up: JO complaint from affected municipalities or welfare recipients
 - Legislative response: HD10443 raises a genuine governance gap — may appear as government proposal in autumn session
 
 ### HD10444
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10444-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10444-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10444 | **Type**: Interpellation | **Filed**: 2026-04-22
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Source authority**: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 **Title**: Interpellation to Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) regarding employer contributions paid to employers engaged in social dumping
 **Filed by**: S MP (interpellation author — name to be confirmed in debate)
 **Target minister**: Elisabeth Svantesson (Moderaterna), Minister for Finance
@@ -1198,7 +1184,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD10444-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **Significance tier**: 🔴 CRITICAL | **DIW weight**: High
 
@@ -1213,28 +1199,27 @@ This framing is politically devastating for Svantesson because:
 
 ---
 
-## Admiralty Rating
+### Admiralty Rating
 - Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval of interpellation filing
 - Content: [B2] Substantive claims in interpellation text not yet verified (text not retrieved in this run)
 - Impact assessment: [B2] Based on political framing inference from title + context
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Watch
+### Forward Watch
 - Debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05 (riksdagen.se anföranden)
 - KU petition risk: LOW unless Svantesson's answer reveals factual errors in prior statements
 - Follow-on media: Aftonbladet investigation into social dumping employers likely
 
 ### HD10445
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10445-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10445-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10445 | **Type**: Interpellation | **Filed**: 2026-04-22
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Source authority**: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 **Title**: Interpellation to Minister for Housing regarding social segregation and housing allocation
 **Filed by**: S MP
 **Target minister**: Erik Slottner (KD), Minister for Civil Affairs and Housing
@@ -1242,7 +1227,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD10445-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **Significance tier**: 🟠 HIGH | **DIW weight**: Medium-High
 
@@ -1254,28 +1239,27 @@ The housing segregation framing links to committee reports HD01CU27/28 (civil la
 
 ---
 
-## Admiralty Rating
+### Admiralty Rating
 - Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval
 - Content: [B2] Substance inferred from title + betänkande cross-reference HD01CU27/28
 - Impact assessment: [B2] Electoral relevance inferred from voter concern surveys
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Watch
+### Forward Watch
 - Slottner's debate answer (HD10445): 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 - Cross-reference: HD01CU27/28 committee reports — if Slottner's answer points to these as his action, S can rebut with insufficiency claims
 - Media: DN/SVT housing desk likely to use this as hook for housing segregation investigation
 
 ### HD10446
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10446-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10446-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10446 | **Type**: Interpellation | **Filed**: 2026-04-22
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Source authority**: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 **Title**: Interpellation to Minister regarding Skatteverket/Socialstyrelsen false death record declarations affecting living citizens
 **Filed by**: S MP
 **Target minister**: Parisa Liljestrand (M) or Gabriel Wikström-equivalent — Minister for Social Affairs or Digital Governance (minister identity to be confirmed from interpellation text)
@@ -1284,7 +1268,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD10446-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **Significance tier**: 🔴 CRITICAL | **DIW weight**: High
 
@@ -1296,46 +1280,45 @@ False death declarations in Swedish welfare state registers (folkbokföring, Ska
 
 ---
 
-## Admiralty Rating
+### Admiralty Rating
 - Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval (filing confirmed)
 - Content: [B3] Substantial substance inferred from title pattern only — full text not retrieved
 - Impact assessment: [B2] Electoral significance based on comparable welfare-state failure stories in 2022–2025 media
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Watch
+### Forward Watch
 - Minister debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 - JO risk: HIGH — false death declarations are exactly the type of systemic failure JO investigates
 - Media: Personal story angle (citizen falsely declared dead) is highly media-friendly → watch Aftonbladet/Expressen
 - Socialstyrelsen/Skatteverket response: Agency heads may be called to parliamentary committee hearing
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Electoral Context (September 2026)
+### Electoral Context (September 2026)
 
 **Election date**: 13 September 2026 (second Sunday of September, confirmed by electoral calendar)
 **Time remaining**: ~145 days
 
 ---
 
-## Today's Events — Electoral Significance
+### Today's Events — Electoral Significance
 
-### S Accountability Offensive (HIGH significance)
+#### S Accountability Offensive (HIGH significance)
 HD10444, HD10445, HD10446, HD10443 + pre-existing HD10442 represent a coordinated S campaign to frame Finance Minister Svantesson and coalition ministers as managing public funds irresponsibly. Electoral logic: S needs to recover fiscal competence image lost during 2014–2022 government tenure. The interpellation strategy targets the coalition's own fiscal credibility narrative [A1].
 
-### HD01FiU48 Enacted (MODERATE significance)
+#### HD01FiU48 Enacted (MODERATE significance)
 The coalition can point to a tangible consumer-benefit delivery (fuel cost relief from 1 May 2026) in the election campaign. Historically, Swedish voters reward demonstrable delivery in their daily costs. Risk: the cut is small enough (82 öre/L) to be lost in price volatility [A1].
 
-### Energy Legislation Sprint (MODERATE significance)
+#### Energy Legislation Sprint (MODERATE significance)
 8+ propositions submitted April 13–16 creates a legislative legacy narrative for the coalition: electricity system reform (HD03240), wind power (HD03239), environmental permitting (HD03238) = energy security agenda heading into election [A1].
 
 ---
 
-## Current Seat Projections (as of April 2026 polling)
+### Current Seat Projections (as of April 2026 polling)
 
 *Note: Based on polling aggregates — exact figures subject to polling error ±2–3 seats per party*
 
@@ -1358,7 +1341,7 @@ The coalition can point to a tangible consumer-benefit delivery (fuel cost relie
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Impact on Seats (from scenario-analysis.md)
+### Scenario Impact on Seats (from scenario-analysis.md)
 
 | Scenario | Expected seat change | Winner |
 |---------|---------------------|--------|
@@ -1368,7 +1351,7 @@ The coalition can point to a tangible consumer-benefit delivery (fuel cost relie
 
 ---
 
-## Electoral Risk Indicators for This Cycle
+### Electoral Risk Indicators for This Cycle
 
 1. **Svantesson interpellation answer quality** [WATCH 2026-04-28]: Poor answer → S picks up 2–4 points in next poll
 2. **L threshold risk**: Any L internal crisis + low polling → 4% threshold loss → Tidö loses 12–16 seats overnight
@@ -1391,12 +1374,11 @@ quadrantChart
 ```
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Current Riksdag Seat Distribution (2022–2026 mandate)
+### Current Riksdag Seat Distribution (2022–2026 mandate)
 
 | Party | Seats | Bloc |
 |-------|-------|------|
@@ -1415,26 +1397,26 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Post-Election Scenario Mathematics (September 2026)
+### Post-Election Scenario Mathematics (September 2026)
 
-### Coalition A: Tidö Continuation (M+KD+L+SD support)
+#### Coalition A: Tidö Continuation (M+KD+L+SD support)
 - Requires M+KD+L ≥ 100 + SD ≥ 70 → ≥ 175/349
 - Current probability: MODERATE (scenario 2 → 55%)
 - Risk: L drops below 4% threshold → Tidö loses 16 seats → falls to ~159/349 → minority without SD active support
 
-### Coalition B: S-led alternative (S+V+MP+C)
+#### Coalition B: S-led alternative (S+V+MP+C)
 - Requires S ≥ 95 + V ≥ 20 + MP ≥ 15 + C ≥ 24 → ≥ 154/349 (majority = 175 — falls short)
 - S+V+MP+C needs more: requires either S >102 or C > 28 to reach 175
 - Current probability: LOW-MODERATE; only viable under Scenario 1 (accountability breakthrough)
 
-### Coalition C: Grand Centre Bloc (M+C+L+S abstain)
+#### Coalition C: Grand Centre Bloc (M+C+L+S abstain)
 - Requires M+C+L ≥ 115 (passive S abstention or confidence-and-supply)
 - Historically rejected by Swedish political culture; not plausible without crisis
 - Current probability: VERY LOW
 
 ---
 
-## Today's Electoral Mathematics Shifts
+### Today's Electoral Mathematics Shifts
 
 | Event | Direction | Seat impact estimate |
 |-------|-----------|---------------------|
@@ -1445,7 +1427,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitivity
+### Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitivity
 
 **Critical 4% threshold parties**: L (currently ~4.5%) and MP (currently ~3.8–4.2%)
 
@@ -1465,44 +1447,43 @@ xychart-beta
 *Note: 175 = majority threshold. Tidö current projects above threshold; S bloc Scenario 1 projects below.*
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Segment Matrix
+### Segment Matrix
 
-### Segment 1: Rural/Commuter Voters (Fuel-Sensitive)
+#### Segment 1: Rural/Commuter Voters (Fuel-Sensitive)
 **Size**: ~800,000 households outside major metropolitan areas with daily car dependency (SCB transport survey estimate)
 **Impact of HD01FiU48**: DIRECT POSITIVE — 82 öre/litre visible at pump from May 1, 2026. Monthly saving for average commuter (~1,500 km/month, 7L/100km): approximately 87 SEK/month. Tangible but modest. [A2 SCB proxy]
 **Electoral leaning**: Historically split between M/SD/C; this measure targets all three parties' core rural base
 **Risk**: C and M compete for this segment's credit; SD may claim insufficient relief
 
-### Segment 2: Urban Progressive Voters (Climate-Sensitive)
+#### Segment 2: Urban Progressive Voters (Climate-Sensitive)
 **Size**: Stockholm/Gothenburg/Malmö metro — approximately 2.8 million voters
 **Impact of HD01FiU48**: NEGATIVE FRAMING — MP and V interpellations against fuel cut tap into this segment's climate anxiety. HD024098 (MP fuel tax motion) and HD024092 (V motion) directly represent this segment's opposition [A1]
 **Impact of Energy legislation (HD03240/239)**: MIXED — electricity system reform + wind power incentives play positively with this segment; coal → renewables framing resonates
 **Electoral leaning**: S/MP/V core; some L and C voters
 
-### Segment 3: Public Sector Workers (Accountability-Sensitive)
+#### Segment 3: Public Sector Workers (Accountability-Sensitive)
 **Size**: ~700,000 municipal and regional government employees
 **Impact of HD10443** (inter-municipal social welfare transfers): DIRECTLY RELEVANT — social workers and welfare administrators most aware of this policy failure [A1]
 **Impact of HD10444** (employer contributions to social dumping): Secondary relevance — fiscal solidarity frame resonates
 **Electoral leaning**: S core voters; moderate turnout amplification if accountability narrative strengthens
 
-### Segment 4: Youth and First-Time Voters (Agency/Justice-Sensitive)
+#### Segment 4: Youth and First-Time Voters (Agency/Justice-Sensitive)
 **Size**: ~300,000 voters aged 18–25 eligible for first time in 2026
 **Impact of HD03246** (unga lagöverträdare — youth criminal sentencing): DIRECTLY RELEVANT — reform of juvenile justice affects this cohort's peers; reactions split between accountability hawks (SD base) and rehabilitation advocates (S/V/MP base) [A1]
 **Impact of eating disorder court case (HD10442)**: Tangentially relevant — eating disorders disproportionately affect youth; governmental accountability on healthcare resonates
 
-### Segment 5: Business Owners and Self-Employed (Economic-Sensitive)
+#### Segment 5: Business Owners and Self-Employed (Economic-Sensitive)
 **Size**: ~500,000 sole traders and SME owners registered in Bolagsverket (proxy)
 **Impact of HD10444** (employer contribution — S interpellation): COMPLEX — if employers are named as social dumping participants, this creates a defensive reaction in the broader business community even though the interpellation targets bad actors specifically. Risk of S being framed as anti-business [B2]
 **Electoral leaning**: M/C core; some L voters
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmetic
+### Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmetic
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1525,8 +1506,7 @@ flowchart TD
 **Net electoral vector**: NEUTRAL to SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE for coalition among swing segments. S offensive mobilises public sector base (Segment 3) but risks Segment 5 backlash. HD01FiU48 benefits Segment 1 but C/SD/M split credit. Election outcome remains contingent on C pivot (see coalition-mathematics.md).
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md -->
 
 ---
 
@@ -1534,9 +1514,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## Comparative Framework
+### Comparative Framework
 
-### Issue 1: Fuel Tax Cuts as Electoral Relief Measure
+#### Issue 1: Fuel Tax Cuts as Electoral Relief Measure
 
 | Jurisdiction | Recent Action | Comparator Evidence | Source |
 |----------|------|----------|--------|
@@ -1546,7 +1526,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Outside-In analysis**: Sweden's approach most closely parallels Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt in structure (temporary, EU-minimum anchored, justified by external shock). Germany's Tankrabatt was heavily criticised by climate groups as distributional regressive and emissions-inefficient — same critique applies to HD01FiU48. However, the German precedent also shows temporary fuel cuts are generally accepted as legitimate emergency relief and do not produce permanent electoral realignment. Sweden's MP and V opposition (HD024098, HD024092) mirrors German Green/SPD-left criticism in 2022.
 
-### Issue 2: Parliamentary Accountability Interpellations — Ministerial Targeting Patterns
+#### Issue 2: Parliamentary Accountability Interpellations — Ministerial Targeting Patterns
 
 | Jurisdiction | Pattern | Comparator Evidence | Source |
 |-----------|-------|---------|--------|
@@ -1556,7 +1536,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Outside-In analysis**: Sweden's interpellation mechanism is more formally structured than UK PMQs but less frequent. The pattern of 4 interpellations in 24 hours targeting one minister (Svantesson) is the Swedish equivalent of a "PMQ blitz" — an intensification that signals pre-election political season has begun. This is normal behaviour for advanced democratic parliaments in election years; the analytical significance is the target selection (Svantesson, highest-profile fiscal figure) not the tactic itself.
 
-### Issue 3: Municipal Social Dumping — International Comparative
+#### Issue 3: Municipal Social Dumping — International Comparative
 
 | Jurisdiction | Policy | Comparator Evidence | Source |
 |-----------|-------|---------|--------|
@@ -1568,7 +1548,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## Synthesis
+### Synthesis
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1591,12 +1571,11 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 1: The 1994 Fuel Tax Cut Pre-Election
+### Parallel 1: The 1994 Fuel Tax Cut Pre-Election
 
 **Historical event**: In spring 1994, the Bildt government (M-led) faced mounting economic pressure and introduced limited energy cost relief measures before the September 1994 election. The economic crisis context (Sweden's 1990s banking crisis) dominated the campaign. The government lost; S returned to power.
 
@@ -1611,7 +1590,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 2: 2018 SD Accountability Interpellations Against Löfven Government
+### Parallel 2: 2018 SD Accountability Interpellations Against Löfven Government
 
 **Historical event**: In the pre-election period of spring 2018, SD filed a cluster of accountability interpellations targeting S Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson on migration costs. The interpellations received moderate media coverage. SD picked up seats in September 2018 election. 
 
@@ -1626,7 +1605,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 3: 2010 Reinfeldt Alliansen Legislative Sprint
+### Parallel 3: 2010 Reinfeldt Alliansen Legislative Sprint
 
 **Historical event**: In spring 2010, the Reinfeldt Alliansen government (M+C+KD+FP) filed a substantial pre-election legislative package covering work-life reforms, infrastructure, and social insurance modifications. The "work-first" narrative dominated the campaign. Alliansen won re-election with an increased mandate.
 
@@ -1641,7 +1620,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Historical Lessons for 2026
+### Historical Lessons for 2026
 
 | Lesson | Source Parallel | Application to 2026 |
 |--------|----------------|---------------------|
@@ -1669,14 +1648,13 @@ timeline
 ```
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Assessments
+### Feasibility Assessments
 
-### 1. HD01FiU48 — Extra Budget / Fuel Tax Cut (Effective 2026-05-01)
+#### 1. HD01FiU48 — Extra Budget / Fuel Tax Cut (Effective 2026-05-01)
 
 **Implementation status**: ENACTED (Riksdag vote 2026-04-21) [A1]
 **Technical feasibility**: HIGH — fuel tax adjustment via Energiskattelagen. Skatteverket has existing mechanisms for overnight tax rate change.
@@ -1686,7 +1664,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **GDPR/legal risk**: NONE — straightforward tax law amendment
 **Residual risk**: Pump price lag (retailers adjust prices weekly not daily; 82 öre saving may be invisible in first week post-May 1) → media expectation management needed
 
-### 2. HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet (Electricity System Reform)
+#### 2. HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet (Electricity System Reform)
 
 **Implementation status**: SUBMITTED to Riksdag 2026-04-14; awaiting committee report [A1]
 **Technical feasibility**: MODERATE — systemic reform of electricity market regulation requires Energimyndigheten implementation framework
@@ -1695,7 +1673,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Political risk**: LOW-MODERATE — energy system reform has broad support; SD's nuclear preference adds complexity but does not block passage
 **Residual risk**: Election calendar risk — reform adopted May/June but implemented September+ means a different government may administer it
 
-### 3. HD10444–HD10446 Interpellation Accountability Chain
+#### 3. HD10444–HD10446 Interpellation Accountability Chain
 
 **Implementation feasibility**: N/A — interpellations are accountability instruments, not legislation
 **Response feasibility**: Svantesson must provide substantive answers to all 3 within the standard interpellation debate window (approximately 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05)
@@ -1703,7 +1681,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Procedural timeline**: Interpellation filed → speaker schedules debate → minister answers → follow-up questions → debate ends
 **Risk of non-answer**: LOW — Swedish parliamentary convention requires minister to engage substantively; refusal to answer is a political cost signal
 
-### 4. HD03246 — Unga lagöverträdare (Youth Offender Sentencing Reform)
+#### 4. HD03246 — Unga lagöverträdare (Youth Offender Sentencing Reform)
 
 **Implementation status**: SUBMITTED to Riksdag 2026-04-16 [A1]
 **Technical feasibility**: HIGH — judicial reform with clear Domstolsverket implementation pathway
@@ -1712,7 +1690,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Risk Summary
+### Feasibility Risk Summary
 
 | Legislation | Feasibility | Timeline Risk | Political Risk | Overall |
 |-----------|------------|--------------|---------------|---------|
@@ -1739,45 +1717,44 @@ gantt
 ```
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## ACH Matrix
+### ACH Matrix
 
-### Hypothesis H1: S Accountability Offensive Is Election-Year Strategy (Primary Assessment)
+#### Hypothesis H1: S Accountability Offensive Is Election-Year Strategy (Primary Assessment)
 **Evidence for**: 4 interpellations in 24 hours, same MP authorship cluster, identical Svantesson targeting pattern, timing (5 months before September 2026 election) [A1]
 **Evidence against**: Interpellations are a standard parliamentary tool used continuously throughout the term; the 2026-04-22 cluster may coincide with end-of-session filing deadline, not strategic choice [A2]
 **ACH weight**: Strong evidence for [A1]; weak countervailing evidence [A2] → H1 stands as primary
 
-### Hypothesis H2: Fuel Tax Cut (HD01FiU48) Is Genuine Emergency Relief, Not Electioneering
+#### Hypothesis H2: Fuel Tax Cut (HD01FiU48) Is Genuine Emergency Relief, Not Electioneering
 **Evidence for**: FiU48 cites EU energy market conditions, Middle East conflict impacts, inflation spike — all documented real-world triggers [A1]; the measure stays at EU minimum floor, not a maximum cut [A2]
 **Evidence against**: Timing (May 2026 start = 4 months before election) suggests electoral calendar influence; no sunset clause makes "temporary" framing weak [B2]; climate expert consensus is that fuel tax cuts are regressive and emission-inefficient [B2]
 **ACH weight**: Mixed [B2+B2] — both emergency relief AND electoral relief are likely simultaneously true; neither hypothesis excludes the other
 
-### Hypothesis H3: Slottner/Carlson Interpellations (HD10445/HD10446) Represent New Accountability Fronts, Not Follow-On
+#### Hypothesis H3: Slottner/Carlson Interpellations (HD10445/HD10446) Represent New Accountability Fronts, Not Follow-On
 **Evidence for**: Slottner (HD10445, social dumping/KD) and Carlson (HD10446, false death declarations/KD) raise completely different policy domains than Svantesson's financial/fiscal domain [A1]; different S MP authors [A1]
 **Evidence against**: All 4 interpellations filed same day by S MPs — coordination signal regardless of domain [A1]; S parliamentary group coordination meetings would explain simultaneous filing [A2]
 **ACH weight**: H3 (independent fronts) has some support but H1 (coordinated campaign) is more parsimonious given same-day filing [A1]
 
 ---
 
-## Competing Hypotheses — What Could This Analysis Get Wrong?
+### Competing Hypotheses — What Could This Analysis Get Wrong?
 
-### Red Team Challenge 1: "The Accountability Offensive Will Backfire"
+#### Red Team Challenge 1: "The Accountability Offensive Will Backfire"
 
 **Devil's Advocate argument**: Finance Minister Svantesson has survived multiple media cycles including the 2025 budget controversy. S has limited ability to convert interpellation success into vote-switching because their core voters are already committed, and the swingable voters (C, L-leaning) are more concerned about welfare state competence than about ministerial accountability theatrics. HD10444 (employer contributions to social dumping employers) may alienate the very small-business and self-employed voters S needs to win back.
 
 **Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge**: Poll data showing S polling above 31% after the interpellation cycle; media coverage classified as "accountability" not "theatre" by neutral outlets [B2 required].
 
-### Red Team Challenge 2: "HD01FiU48 Has No Electoral Effect"
+#### Red Team Challenge 2: "HD01FiU48 Has No Electoral Effect"
 
 **Devil's Advocate argument**: Fuel tax cuts are politically effective only when consumers see an immediate visible effect at the pump. The 82 öre/litre cut (approximately 8 kr per tankful for a typical car) is smaller than normal pump price volatility (10–15 kr/L swings). Voters do not attribute diffuse tax cuts to specific government decisions. The fuel tax cut will be invisible in election-day retrospective assessments.
 
 **Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge**: Swedish consumer sentiment data showing government approval increase in May 2026 fuel period [B2 required]; or alternatively, opposition research showing the cut is too small to matter (which would validate this red team challenge).
 
-### Red Team Challenge 3: "The Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU33/32) Are the Real Long-Term Story"
+#### Red Team Challenge 3: "The Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU33/32) Are the Real Long-Term Story"
 
 **Devil's Advocate argument**: The realtime monitor analysis is over-indexing on visible interpellation drama and underweighting the structural constitutional amendments (HD01KU33/32) that require a post-2026 election second vote. These amendments — which may concern fundamental rights or electoral rules — will have lasting effects far beyond the current legislative session. The interpellation cycle is ephemeral; the constitutional amendments are permanent.
 
@@ -1785,7 +1762,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ACH Summary Table
+### ACH Summary Table
 
 | Hypothesis | Evidence For | Evidence Against | ACH Weight | Status |
 |------------|-------------|-----------------|------------|--------|
@@ -1797,14 +1774,13 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | RC3: Constitutional amendments underweighted | [B2] structural long-term | [B2] requires full text review | TBD | **FLAG for follow-on** |
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Classification Framework (7 Dimensions)
+### Classification Framework (7 Dimensions)
 
-### Dimensions
+#### Dimensions
 1. **Policy Domain** — Primary policy area
 2. **Political Valence** — Partisan direction (government/opposition/cross-party)
 3. **Legislative Stage** — Current parliamentary position
@@ -1815,9 +1791,9 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Document Classifications
+### Document Classifications
 
-### HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgift Abuse [Interpellation]
+#### HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgift Abuse [Interpellation]
 
 | Dimension | Classification |
 |-----------|---------------|
@@ -1829,7 +1805,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDPR | Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed; Data minimisation applied |
 | Retention | 5 years (electoral significance) |
 
-### HD10443 — Social Dumpning [Interpellation]
+#### HD10443 — Social Dumpning [Interpellation]
 
 | Dimension | Classification |
 |-----------|---------------|
@@ -1841,7 +1817,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDPR | Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed |
 | Retention | 5 years |
 
-### HD10445 — Housing Pre-emption [Interpellation]
+#### HD10445 — Housing Pre-emption [Interpellation]
 
 | Dimension | Classification |
 |-----------|---------------|
@@ -1853,7 +1829,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDPR | Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed |
 | Retention | 5 years |
 
-### HD10446 — False Death Declarations [Interpellation]
+#### HD10446 — False Death Declarations [Interpellation]
 
 | Dimension | Classification |
 |-----------|---------------|
@@ -1865,7 +1841,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDPR | Art. 9(2)(g) public interest; data minimisation |
 | Retention | 3 years |
 
-### HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget [Betänkande ENACTED]
+#### HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget [Betänkande ENACTED]
 
 | Dimension | Classification |
 |-----------|---------------|
@@ -1877,7 +1853,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDPR | N/A (legislative, no personal data) |
 | Retention | Permanent (legislative record) |
 
-### HD03240 — Nya Lagar om Elsystemet [Proposition]
+#### HD03240 — Nya Lagar om Elsystemet [Proposition]
 
 | Dimension | Classification |
 |-----------|---------------|
@@ -1889,7 +1865,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDPR | N/A |
 | Retention | Permanent |
 
-### HD03232/HD03231 — Ukraine Tribunals [Propositions]
+#### HD03232/HD03231 — Ukraine Tribunals [Propositions]
 
 | Dimension | Classification |
 |-----------|---------------|
@@ -1903,21 +1879,21 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Priority Tier Classification
+### Priority Tier Classification
 
-### Tier P0 — Highest Priority (immediate monitoring)
+#### Tier P0 — Highest Priority (immediate monitoring)
 - HD10444, HD10443, HD10445 (interpellations targeting ministers)
 
-### Tier P1 — High Priority (track through committee/debate)
+#### Tier P1 — High Priority (track through committee/debate)
 - HD01FiU48 (enacted — implementation monitoring)
 - HD03240 (new electricity system law — committee)
 
-### Tier P2 — Standard Priority
+#### Tier P2 — Standard Priority
 - HD03232, HD03231, HD03246, HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD03242
 
 ---
 
-## Information Access Control
+### Information Access Control
 - All documents: **Public access** (Offentlighetsprincipen — Swedish Freedom of the Press Act)
 - Source: data.riksdagen.se (official open data)
 - No restricted or classified material in this analysis
@@ -1937,42 +1913,41 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Policy Clusters
+### Policy Clusters
 
-### Cluster A — Fiscal & Economic Coherence
+#### Cluster A — Fiscal & Economic Coherence
 - HD01FiU48 ↔ HD03236 (Extra budget prop.) ↔ HD024098/092 (opposition motions)
 - HD10444 ↔ employer contribution reduction (enacted April 2026) ↔ Aftonbladet investigation
 - Cluster logic: The fuel tax relief and employer contribution policy share the same fiscal instrument (tax reduction for economic stimulus) and the same accountability vulnerability (risk of exploitation)
 
-### Cluster B — Ukraine Diplomatic Package
+#### Cluster B — Ukraine Diplomatic Package
 - HD03232 ↔ HD03231 (both Utrikesdepartementet, both 2026-04-16)
 - Both represent Sweden's commitment to Ukraine's transitional justice architecture
 - Cross-reference: Sweden's NATO membership context (ratified 2024) amplifies the diplomatic significance
 
-### Cluster C — Energy & Climate Transition
+#### Cluster C — Energy & Climate Transition
 - HD03240 (Nya lagar om elsystemet) ↔ HD03239 (Vindkraft i kommuner) ↔ HD03238 (Ny miljöprövningsmyndighet)
 - Three-part energy reform package submitted April 13–14, 2026
 - Thematic coherence: electricity system law + wind power incentives + environmental permitting reform
 
-### Cluster D — Parliamentary Accountability (Today)
+#### Cluster D — Parliamentary Accountability (Today)
 - HD10444 ↔ HD10443 ↔ HD10445 ↔ HD10446 (all S interpellations, 2026-04-22)
 - HD10442 (filed 2026-04-21, S/Svantesson eating disorder)
 - Cluster logic: 5 interpellations in 2 days, 3 targeting Svantesson = coordinated S campaign
 
-### Cluster E — Constitutional Reform
+#### Cluster E — Constitutional Reform
 - HD01KU33 ↔ HD01KU32 (both KU betänkanden, both constitutional amendments first reading, 2026-04-17)
 - Both require second vote after 2026 election to become law — creates a post-election governance agenda
 
 ---
 
-## Legislative Chains
+### Legislative Chains
 
-### Chain 1: Fuel Tax Relief
+#### Chain 1: Fuel Tax Relief
 ```
 prop. 2025/26:236 (HD03236) →
 FiU48 (HD01FiU48, adopted 2026-04-21) →
@@ -1980,7 +1955,7 @@ Law amendment (effective 2026-05-01) →
 Opposition motions HD024098/092 (overridden)
 ```
 
-### Chain 2: Energy System Reform
+#### Chain 2: Energy System Reform
 ```
 prop. 2025/26:240 (HD03240) →
 prop. 2025/26:239 (HD03239) →
@@ -1988,7 +1963,7 @@ prop. 2025/26:238 (HD03238) →
 Committee review (pending)
 ```
 
-### Chain 3: Ministerial Accountability
+#### Chain 3: Ministerial Accountability
 ```
 Past Svantesson statements →
 Aftonbladet investigation →
@@ -1999,31 +1974,31 @@ Debate answer (2026-04-28–05-05) →
 
 ---
 
-## Sibling Folders — Tier-C Cross-Type Citations
+### Sibling Folders — Tier-C Cross-Type Citations
 
-### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/
+#### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/
 - Synthesis summary reviewed: HD03100 (vårproposition), HD03236 (extra budget), HD03240 (el-system), HD03239 (vindkraft), HD03238 (miljöprövning), HD03246 (unga), HD03231/232 (Ukraina)
 - Cross-reference: Propositions cluster C (energy reform) and cluster B (Ukraine) directly feed this realtime analysis
 - PIR inherited: "What is the coalition's energy security legislative timetable before September 2026 election?"
 
-### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/
+#### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/
 - Synthesis summary reviewed: HD024082–HD024098 (fuel tax opposition, deportation, arms)
 - Cross-reference: S/V/MP triple fuel tax rejection (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) establishes the opposition's climate-fiscal dividing line
 - PIR inherited: "How will opposition parties exploit the fuel tax cut in the election campaign?"
 
-### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/
+#### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/
 - Synthesis summary reviewed: HD01FiU48 (extra budget ENACTED), HD01KU33/32 (constitutional), HD01CU27/28 (housing)
 - Cross-reference: HD01FiU48 enacted — direct cause of today's accountability interpellations
 - PIR inherited: "When will KU constitutional amendments (KU33/32) come to second reading post-election?"
 
-### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/
+#### analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/
 - Synthesis summary reviewed: HD10442–HD10446 (S accountability offensive)
 - Cross-reference: HD10442 (eating disorder, filed 2026-04-21) is the pre-existing live risk that today's new interpellations reinforce
 - PIR inherited: "Is the S accountability strategy a one-day event or a sustained multi-week campaign?"
 
 ---
 
-## Coordinated-Activity Patterns
+### Coordinated-Activity Patterns
 
 1. **S interpellation cluster**: 4 interpellations in 24 hours, all authored by S MPs, all targeting coalition ministers on documented past statements or policy failures — clear coordination indicator [B2]
 2. **S+V+MP fuel tax motions**: Three parties simultaneously filed fuel tax rejection motions on the same proposition — opportunistic coordination, not pre-planned (motions filed on different days but same legislative target) [B2]
@@ -2044,15 +2019,14 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Standard**: ICD 203 + Admiralty Code + SAT Catalog
 **Classification**: Public | **Cycle**: Realtime-2338
 
 ---
 
-## ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)
+### ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)
 
 | Standard | Implementation in This Cycle | Assessment |
 |---------|------------------------------|-----------|
@@ -2068,7 +2042,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) Applied
+### Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) Applied
 
 1. **ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)**: Applied in devils-advocate.md — 3 hypotheses + 3 red team challenges with evidentiary requirements specified.
 2. **Scenario analysis**: 3 scenarios (breakthrough, containment, fragmentation) with probability distribution summing to 100% in scenario-analysis.md.
@@ -2083,7 +2057,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Methodology Improvements (Pass 2 Identified)
+### Methodology Improvements (Pass 2 Identified)
 
 1. **Improve KJ-2 confidence**: KJ-2 (fuel tax electoral impact) is currently MODERATE because consumer response is unobservable. Next cycle should include SCB CPI data or consumer confidence indices from the SCB MCP server to provide a quantitative anchor.
 
@@ -2093,7 +2067,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Data Quality Limitations
+### Data Quality Limitations
 
 | Limitation | Impact | Mitigation applied |
 |-----------|--------|-------------------|
@@ -2104,13 +2078,12 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Tradecraft Context
+### Tradecraft Context
 
 All analysis in this cycle follows the osint-tradecraft-standards.md canon: ICD 203 audit above confirms 9/9 standards applied. Admiralty codes are [A1] (authoritative, confirmed), [A2] (authoritative, probably true), [B2] (reliable, probably true), [B3] (reliable, possibly true) — no fabricated or unrated claims committed to artifact files. PIR handoff to next cycle documented in intelligence-assessment.md §Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion with full resolution status.
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Workflow**: news-realtime-monitor
 **Run ID**: 24808210801
@@ -2120,12 +2093,12 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
 **Subfolder**: realtime-2338
 
-## MCP Server Status
+### MCP Server Status
 - riksdag-regering: **LIVE** (verified via get_sync_status at 23:38:04Z)
 - scb: available
 - world-bank: available
 
-## Breaking News Signals Detected
+### Breaking News Signals Detected
 
 | Priority | Category | Count |
 |----------|----------|-------|
@@ -2134,9 +2107,9 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HIGH | Recent propositions (2026-04-14–16) | 10 |
 | MEDIUM | Opposition motions on prop. 2025/26:236 | 5 |
 
-## Document Index
+### Document Index
 
-### Primary: Today's Interpellations (2026-04-22) — Breaking
+#### Primary: Today's Interpellations (2026-04-22) — Breaking
 
 | dok_id | Title | Author | Target Minister | Retrieved | Full-text |
 |--------|-------|--------|----------------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -2145,7 +2118,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD10444 | Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter | Jonathan Svensson (S) | Elisabeth Svantesson (M) | 23:38Z | metadata |
 | HD10443 | Social dumpning mellan kommuner | Peder Björk (S) | Erik Slottner (KD) | 23:38Z | metadata |
 
-### Secondary: Recent Betänkanden (2026-04-21)
+#### Secondary: Recent Betänkanden (2026-04-21)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Committee | Retrieved | Full-text |
 |--------|-------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -2155,7 +2128,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD01KU43 | En ny lag om riksdagens medalj | KU | 23:38Z | metadata |
 | HD01MJU21 | Riksrevisionens rapport — jordbrukets klimatomställning | MJU | 23:38Z | metadata |
 
-### Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)
+#### Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Committee | Retrieved | Full-text |
 |--------|-------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -2165,7 +2138,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD01CU28 | Ett register för alla bostadsrätter | CU | 23:38Z | metadata |
 | HD01CU27 | Identitetskrav vid lagfart | CU | 23:38Z | metadata |
 
-### Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–16)
+#### Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–16)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Department | Date | Retrieved | Full-text |
 |--------|-------|------------|------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -2178,7 +2151,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03239 | Vindkraft i kommuner | Klimat- och näringsliv | 2026-04-14 | 23:38Z | metadata |
 | HD03238 | Ny myndighet för miljöprövning | Klimat- och näringsliv | 2026-04-14 | 23:38Z | metadata |
 
-### Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)
+#### Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Party | Dok-typ | Retrieved | Full-text |
 |--------|-------|-------|---------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -2193,14 +2166,46 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD024093 | Cybersäkerhetscenter (komplettering) | C | mot | 23:38Z | metadata |
 | HD024089 | Ny mottagandelag (kommunalt stöd) | C | mot | 23:38Z | metadata |
 
-## Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C Synthesis)
+### Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C Synthesis)
 - analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/ — 15 docs incl. vårproposition HD03100
 - analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/ — 20 docs incl. HD024082–HD024098
 - analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/ — 10 docs incl. HD01FiU48
 - analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/ — 5 docs incl. HD10442–HD10446
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 - All documents retrieved from data.riksdagen.se via riksdag-regering MCP server
 - Full text not fetched for all documents (metadata-only for most)
 - Sibling folder synthesis summaries read for Tier-C cross-reference
 - No lookback required — documents confirmed for 2026-04-22
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10443-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10444-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10445-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10446-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/article.md
index 77df76c74a..04e38ca7dc 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-23
 subfolder: committeeReports
 slug: 2026-04-23-committeeReports
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.910Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.708Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,18 +26,17 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal package (fuel tax cuts + energy support) and two dormant constitutional amendments (TF/YGL) with significant pre-election implications. The fiscal intervention directly lowers household energy costs five months before the September 2026 election, while the constitutional reforms require post-election ratification — creating legal continuity stakes tied to election outcomes. Three housing market transparency measures (property identity requirements and a national bostadsrättsregister) add up to the most significant housing market reform in over a decade.
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 | # | Decision | Supported By | Confidence |
 |---|----------|--------------|------------|
@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal pack
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ 60-Second Read
+### ⚡ 60-Second Read
 
 ```
 FISCAL EMERGENCY (HIGH PRIORITY)
@@ -78,7 +77,7 @@ ADMINISTRATIVE DEREGULATION (LOW PRIORITY)
 
 ---
 
-## 🚨 Top Forward Trigger
+### 🚨 Top Forward Trigger
 
 **Watch**: How S, V, and MP respond to FiU48 in the Riksdag debate and campaign messaging. If the opposition frames this as fiscal irresponsibility + climate regression, it will define a key election battleground. Monitor Riksbank commentary on inflationary effects of fuel subsidy policy — central bank disagreement would amplify opposition arguments.
 
@@ -86,7 +85,7 @@ ADMINISTRATIVE DEREGULATION (LOW PRIORITY)
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Label Summary
+### Confidence Label Summary
 
 | Area | Confidence | Basis |
 |------|------------|-------|
@@ -98,7 +97,7 @@ ADMINISTRATIVE DEREGULATION (LOW PRIORITY)
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context
 
 **WEP Quick Reference** (Pass 2 improvement — explicit probability anchors):
 - *Almost certain* (95%+): Vilande amendments (KU33/KU32) adopted by current Riksdag — procedure is binding
@@ -110,8 +109,7 @@ ADMINISTRATIVE DEREGULATION (LOW PRIORITY)
 **Admiralty source assessment**: All factual claims [A1] (official Riksdag documents); electoral projection [C3] (structural analyst inference).
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Analysis folder**: `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/`
 **Generated**: 2026-04-23T05:00:00Z
@@ -121,11 +119,11 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Lead Story: Emergency Budget Signals Pre-Election Fiscal Shift
+### 🎯 Lead Story: Emergency Budget Signals Pre-Election Fiscal Shift
 
 The highest-significance decision in this batch is **HD01FiU48** (Extra ändringsbudget 2026), which represents the Tidö coalition deploying SEK 4.1 billion in emergency fiscal measures — fuel tax cuts and energy support — just five months before the September 2026 election. This is the dominant intelligence picture: a government using constitutional emergency budget procedures for what critics will characterize as election-year fiscal stimulus.
 
-## 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking
+### 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title (abbreviated) | D | I | W | DIW Score | Tier |
 |------|--------|---------------------|---|---|---|-----------|------|
@@ -142,7 +140,7 @@ The highest-significance decision in this batch is **HD01FiU48** (Extra ändring
 
 *D = Decision impact, I = Implementation urgency, W = Political weight*
 
-## 🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture
+### 🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","secondaryColor":"#2E7D32","secondaryTextColor":"#ffffff","tertiaryColor":"#FF6B35","tertiaryTextColor":"#ffffff","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
@@ -191,37 +189,37 @@ mindmap
     classDef low fill:#616161,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## 🔍 Five Strategic Themes
+### 🔍 Five Strategic Themes
 
-### 1. Pre-Election Fiscal Stimulus (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)
+#### 1. Pre-Election Fiscal Stimulus (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)
 FiU48 is an election-year emergency measure. The government's use of the extraordinary "extra ändringsbudget" mechanism for household energy cost relief signals that energy/fuel prices are perceived as an existential electoral threat. The SEK 4.1bn cost will feature in the autumn campaign — both as evidence of government responsiveness (coalition framing) and as fiscal irresponsibility (opposition framing).
 
-### 2. Constitutional Modernization Before Election (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)
+#### 2. Constitutional Modernization Before Election (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)
 Two TF/YGL amendments adopted as vilande in KU33 and KU32 require the incoming post-September 2026 Riksdag to ratify them. This creates a constitutional continuity dependency: a changed government or altered parliamentary majority could refuse the second vote. The constitutional package — restricting transparency of seized digital materials (KU33) and enabling accessibility obligations for media (KU32) — reflects a delicate balance between law enforcement modernization and fundamental freedoms.
 
-### 3. Housing Market Integrity (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)
+#### 3. Housing Market Integrity (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)
 CU27 and CU28 together form a comprehensive housing market transparency reform: national bostadsrättsregister + identity requirements for property transfers. These address money laundering (CU27), consumer protection (CU28), and credit market efficiency (CU28). Both effective before election, creating tangible visible improvements for the large Swedish bostadsrätt owner constituency.
 
-### 4. Environmental Governance Under Scrutiny (MEDIUM SIGNIFICANCE)
+#### 4. Environmental Governance Under Scrutiny (MEDIUM SIGNIFICANCE)
 MJU21 (Riksrevisionen agriculture climate audit) and MJU19 (waste law reform) reflect dual pressures: EU compliance obligations (MJU19) and domestic audit scrutiny of climate policy effectiveness (MJU21). The Riksrevisionen finding on agricultural climate transition could emerge as a campaign issue if the government's rural/farming support bloc conflicts with its climate commitments.
 
-### 5. Deregulation and Simplification Micro-signals
+#### 5. Deregulation and Simplification Micro-signals
 SfU20 and TU16 are individually minor but together signal the government's administrative deregulation agenda — removing requirements that no longer serve their stated purpose. Pre-election optics: competent, practical governance.
 
-## 📡 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### 📡 AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 **SEO Title** (EN): "Sweden's Riksdag Approves Emergency Fuel Tax Cut and Constitutional Reform Package, April 2026"
 **SEO Title** (SV): "Riksdagen godkänner nödbromsat drivmedelsskatt och grundlagspaket april 2026"
 **Meta Description** (EN): "Sweden's parliament approved emergency fuel tax cuts worth SEK 4.1 billion and three constitutional amendments in April 2026, setting the stage for a pivotal election-year legislative sprint."
 **Keywords**: committee reports, riksdag, fuel tax, constitutional amendment, bostadsrätt, election 2026, FiU48, KU33, Sweden politics
 
-## Confidence Summary
+### Confidence Summary
 
 Overall analysis confidence: HIGH [B2] — Based on official riksdagen.se primary sources for all 10 documents; fiscal figures confirmed from government budget text as summarized; political analysis MEDIUM [C3] based on structural reasoning from known party positions.
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context
 
 **Source quality**: [A1] Official riksdagen.se API data for all 10 documents — highest evidence grade.
 **Analytic confidence**: PRIMARY = [B2] factual findings; SECONDARY = [C3] electoral interpretations.
@@ -236,14 +234,13 @@ Overall analysis confidence: HIGH [B2] — Based on official riksdagen.se primar
 **Limitations**: No access to internal party polling, coalition agreement revision documents, or Riksdag committee debate records (anföranden) — these would improve confidence on KJ-1 and KJ-4.
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### Key Judgment KJ-1: The Tidö Coalition Will Gain Short-Term Electoral Benefit from FiU48
+#### Key Judgment KJ-1: The Tidö Coalition Will Gain Short-Term Electoral Benefit from FiU48
 
 We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the emergency fuel tax cut and energy support package (HD01FiU48) will provide measurable short-term electoral benefit to the Tidö coalition, particularly with rural and commuter voters. The timing (1 May–30 Sep 2026, covering the election campaign) is deliberately calibrated. However, fiscal responsiveness may be partially offset by opposition framing of the SEK 4.1bn cost as irresponsible pre-election spending.
 
@@ -252,7 +249,7 @@ We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the emergency fuel tax cut and energy
 
 ---
 
-### Key Judgment KJ-2: The Constitutional Package (KU33, KU32) Represents Genuine Policy Need Plus Election-Year Execution
+#### Key Judgment KJ-2: The Constitutional Package (KU33, KU32) Represents Genuine Policy Need Plus Election-Year Execution
 
 We assess with **HIGH confidence** that both TF amendments (KU33 digital seizure transparency; KU32 media accessibility) address genuine legal modernization needs, but are advanced on an accelerated timeline driven by election-cycle deadlines. The vilande status creates post-election constitutional continuity risk — particularly for KU33, which may face partisan opposition from an S-led government.
 
@@ -261,7 +258,7 @@ We assess with **HIGH confidence** that both TF amendments (KU33 digital seizure
 
 ---
 
-### Key Judgment KJ-3: Sweden's Housing Market Transparency Has a Meaningful Post-CU27/CU28 Improvement Floor
+#### Key Judgment KJ-3: Sweden's Housing Market Transparency Has a Meaningful Post-CU27/CU28 Improvement Floor
 
 We assess with **HIGH confidence** that the combined CU27 (identity requirements) + CU28 (national register) reforms represent the most significant structural improvement to Swedish bostadsrätt market transparency in over a decade. Money laundering reduction will be partial (see H3 in devils-advocate.md) but the consumer protection and credit market efficiency gains are substantial and cross-party supported.
 
@@ -270,7 +267,7 @@ We assess with **HIGH confidence** that the combined CU27 (identity requirements
 
 ---
 
-### Key Judgment KJ-4: The Government's Environmental Credibility Is Under Pressure
+#### Key Judgment KJ-4: The Government's Environmental Credibility Is Under Pressure
 
 We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fuel tax cuts (climate-adverse signal) and MJU21 Riksrevisionen criticism of agricultural climate transition support will combine to damage the Tidö coalition's environmental credibility, particularly with C and MP voters. This is partially offset by MJU19 (waste law EU compliance) but not substantially.
 
@@ -279,7 +276,7 @@ We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fue
 
 ---
 
-## Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for Next Cycle
+### Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for Next Cycle
 
 | PIR | Requirement | Trigger | Priority |
 |-----|------------|---------|----------|
@@ -289,7 +286,7 @@ We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fue
 | PIR-4 | What are fuel price levels in September–October 2026 when FiU48 subsidy expires? | Energy market monitoring | MEDIUM |
 | PIR-5 | What does MJU21 full Riksrevisionen report recommend vs. government response? | Full report publication | MEDIUM |
 
-## Key Assumptions Check
+### Key Assumptions Check
 
 | Assumption | Basis | Robustness |
 |-----------|-------|------------|
@@ -299,7 +296,7 @@ We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fue
 | S opposes KU33 second vote | Based on historical S FOI positions [B3] | Medium |
 | FiU48 fuel subsidy expires as scheduled 30 Sep 2026 | Legislative text confirmed [A1] | High |
 
-## Overall Intelligence Confidence
+### Overall Intelligence Confidence
 
 **HIGH confidence** in factual findings (all 10 documents confirmed from primary sources).
 **MEDIUM confidence** in electoral and political impact predictions.
@@ -307,7 +304,7 @@ We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fue
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)
 
 **SAT Technique used**: Key Judgments method per ICD 203; ACH used in devils-advocate.md to stress-test KJ-1.
 **WEP Summary for KJs**:
@@ -319,10 +316,9 @@ We assess with **MEDIUM confidence** that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fue
 **PIR Standing Review**: All 5 PIRs above feed into the standing PIR framework from osint-tradecraft-standards.md. PIR-1 maps to standing PIR-1 (government stability/electoral intent); PIR-2 maps to standing PIR-2 (legislative agenda continuity); PIR-5 maps to standing PIR-5 (environmental policy implementation).
 
 ## Significance Scoring
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md -->
 
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md)_
-
-## DIW Scoring Criteria
+### DIW Scoring Criteria
 
 | Dimension | 5 = Maximum | 1 = Minimum |
 |-----------|-------------|-------------|
@@ -330,7 +326,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | **I** — Implementation impact | National systemic, 1M+ affected | Local/administrative, <1000 affected |
 | **W** — Political weight | Government-opposition divide, election-defining | Procedural/bipartisan, no controversy |
 
-## Ranked Scoring Table
+### Ranked Scoring Table
 
 | Rank | dok_id | D | I | W | DIW | Tier | Source |
 |------|--------|---|---|---|-----|------|--------|
@@ -345,7 +341,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | 9 | HD01SfU20 — Slopat anmälningskrav föräldrapenning | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | L1 | riksdagen.se [A1] |
 | 10 | HD01TU16 — Slopat krav introduktionsutbildning körning | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | L1 | riksdagen.se [A1] |
 
-## 📊 Significance Rank Diagram
+### 📊 Significance Rank Diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
@@ -356,7 +352,7 @@ xychart-beta
     bar [15, 13, 12, 12, 11, 10, 9, 9, 6, 6]
 ```
 
-## Sensitivity Analysis
+### Sensitivity Analysis
 
 **What if FiU48 fiscal impact is larger?** The SEK 4.1bn figure is confirmed from primary source. Even conservative scenarios place the fiscal signal at L2+ — the emergency budget mechanism use alone justifies the highest political weight score regardless of exact amounts.
 
@@ -364,17 +360,16 @@ xychart-beta
 
 **What if CU27/CU28 encounter implementation difficulties?** Register construction for bostadsrätter has been debated for years; the 2027 implementation date gives government time — but delays could become a campaign liability.
 
-## Scoring Methodology Notes
+### Scoring Methodology Notes
 
 DIW weights applied per `synthesis-methodology.md` Part 1. All documents confirmed via riksdagen.se primary source [A1] — Admiralty source reliability: A (completely reliable). All dok_ids verified via MCP API response at 2026-04-23T04:45Z.
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md)_
-
-## Predicted Editorial Frames by Issue
+### Predicted Editorial Frames by Issue
 
-### HD01FiU48 — Emergency Budget (Fuel / Energy)
+#### HD01FiU48 — Emergency Budget (Fuel / Energy)
 
 | Medium type | Likely primary frame | Likely secondary frame |
 |-------------|---------------------|----------------------|
@@ -386,7 +381,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 **Net frame prediction**: Dual-track coverage — economic relief story dominant (reaches ~65% of audience); environmental cost story secondary (~35% of audience). Coalition net benefit: positive, especially among targeted rural/suburban demographic.
 
-### KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments
+#### KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments
 
 | Medium type | Likely frame |
 |-------------|-------------|
@@ -397,7 +392,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 **Net frame**: Low salience in mainstream media; high salience in policy/press-freedom community. Does not benefit or hurt coalition significantly in voter terms.
 
-### CU27/CU28 — Property / Housing Anti-Crime
+#### CU27/CU28 — Property / Housing Anti-Crime
 
 | Medium type | Likely frame |
 |-------------|-------------|
@@ -407,7 +402,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 **Net frame**: Crime-reduction narrative resonates with SD/M base. Industry concerns provide opposition angle.
 
-## Disinformation Risk Assessment
+### Disinformation Risk Assessment
 
 | Risk vector | Probability | Mitigation |
 |-------------|-------------|------------|
@@ -415,15 +410,14 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | KU33 framed as "press censorship" | LOW-MEDIUM | Text clearly expands access; however "vilande" process creates uncertainty window |
 | CU28 registry framed as "surveillance register" | LOW | Register is existing-owner-only; accuracy may reduce concerns |
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 Media framing is predictive analysis [C3] based on pattern recognition from past Swedish legislative coverage. Actual media response depends on editorial decisions not observable in advance. Confidence: LOW [C4].
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
-
-## 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
+### 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
 
 | Stakeholder | Interest | Power | Impact | Position | Named Actor | Source |
 |-------------|----------|-------|--------|----------|-------------|--------|
@@ -443,7 +437,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Farming sector (LRF) | High — FiU48 diesel cuts; MJU21 climate critique | Medium | Mixed: fuel relief positive; climate audit negative | Ambivalent | LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) | [B2] |
 | Car-dependent households (rural, commuter) | High — direct FiU48 beneficiaries | Electoral | Positive | Supportive | Structural — no named actor | [B2] |
 
-## Influence Network
+### Influence Network
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
@@ -483,15 +477,14 @@ flowchart LR
     style MEDIA fill:#F57F17,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Neutrality Audit
+### Neutrality Audit
 
 Analysis covers 8 parties + institutional actors. No party systematically advantaged in framing. Positive and negative assessments applied based on primary source evidence [A1] and structural reasoning [B3], not editorial preference. All named actors hold public positions making their views a matter of public record per GDPR Art. 9(2)(e).
 
 ## Forward Indicators
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md -->
 
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md)_
-
-## 72-Hour Horizon
+### 72-Hour Horizon
 
 | Indicator | Date | Observable sign | Significance |
 |-----------|------|-----------------|--------------|
@@ -500,7 +493,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | I-03: KU32 Riksdag vote | 2026-04-24 | Vilande adoption formal | Constitutional process confirmed |
 | I-04: Party press releases | 2026-04-23 | S, V, MP framing of FiU48 | Measures opposition effectiveness |
 
-## One-Week Horizon
+### One-Week Horizon
 
 | Indicator | Date | Observable sign | Significance |
 |-----------|------|-----------------|--------------|
@@ -509,7 +502,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | I-07: IVO comment on CU22 | 2026-04-28 | IVO press release | Supervisory reform signal |
 | I-08: Riksdag committee follow-up | 2026-04-30 | CU/KU post-decision notes | Any reconsideration signals |
 
-## One-Month Horizon
+### One-Month Horizon
 
 | Indicator | Date | Observable sign | Significance |
 |-----------|------|-----------------|--------------|
@@ -519,7 +512,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | I-12: Riksbank inflation report | 2026-05-15 | Rate decision + forecast | Coalition economic context |
 | I-13: SCB housing price data | 2026-05-06 | Swedish housing market indicators | CU27/CU28 implementation environment |
 
-## Election-Cycle Horizon
+### Election-Cycle Horizon
 
 | Indicator | Date | Observable sign | Significance |
 |-----------|------|-----------------|--------------|
@@ -530,13 +523,13 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | I-18: CU22 new authority established | 2027-01-01 | Authority operational | Guardianship reform completion |
 | I-19: FiU48 renewable energy investment outcome | 2026-12-31 | Government progress report | Policy effectiveness |
 
-## Confidence Note
+### Confidence Note
 
 Indicator dates are derived from legislative timelines stated in KU33/KU32 documentation [A1], government procedural norms [B2], and standard Swedish legislative cycles [B3]. Election date 2026-09-13 is the statutory election Sunday [A1].
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)
 
 **Key milestones matrix**:
 
@@ -550,16 +543,15 @@ Indicator dates are derived from legislative timelines stated in KU33/KU32 docum
 **Collection gap**: No automated trigger monitoring available in current system — all indicators require manual collection. Recommend Agentic Workflow realtime-monitor to watch riksdagen.se for I-01, I-02, I-03 votes.
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)_
-
-## Scenario Framework
+### Scenario Framework
 
 Three scenarios for how April 2026 committee report decisions shape the Swedish political and legal landscape through election and beyond.
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 1 — Continuity: Tidö Re-elected, Full Constitutional Package Confirmed (35%)
+### Scenario 1 — Continuity: Tidö Re-elected, Full Constitutional Package Confirmed (35%)
 
 **Description**: The Tidö coalition wins re-election in September 2026. In the autumn session, the new Riksdag passes the second vote on KU33 and KU32. Both TF/YGL amendments enter into force on 1 January 2027. The bostadsrättsregister (CU28) launches on schedule. Fuel prices stabilize as Middle East tensions ease and the temporary fuel tax subsidy expires 30 September 2026 without cliff-edge shock.
 
@@ -575,7 +567,7 @@ Three scenarios for how April 2026 committee report decisions shape the Swedish
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 2 — Partial Disruption: Government Change, Constitutional Package Blocked (45%)
+### Scenario 2 — Partial Disruption: Government Change, Constitutional Package Blocked (45%)
 
 **Description**: Social Democrats form government with V support after September 2026 election. New KU committee is constituted with different chairperson. The second vote on KU33 is refused or delayed (S traditionally more protective of offentlighetsprincipen). KU32 (accessibility, EU-driven) likely passes regardless. FiU48 energy support creates a cliff-edge debate — S campaign to make energy support permanent vs. Riksbank warning on inflation. CU28 bostadsrättsregister proceeds (cross-party support).
 
@@ -592,7 +584,7 @@ Three scenarios for how April 2026 committee report decisions shape the Swedish
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario 3 — Cliff-Edge Energy Crisis: Fuel Tax Subsidy Expiry Shock (20%)
+### Scenario 3 — Cliff-Edge Energy Crisis: Fuel Tax Subsidy Expiry Shock (20%)
 
 **Description**: The FiU48 temporary fuel tax cut expires 30 September 2026, coinciding with autumn heating season. If geopolitical factors maintain high energy prices, households face a sudden price jump precisely as election results are being processed and coalition negotiations begin. This creates a political crisis: whoever forms government faces immediate pressure to extend the subsidy (fiscal cost: ~SEK 1.5bn per period), while Riksbank and fiscal hawks argue against.
 
@@ -608,7 +600,7 @@ Three scenarios for how April 2026 committee report decisions shape the Swedish
 
 ---
 
-## Probability Summary
+### Probability Summary
 
 | Scenario | Probability | Sum |
 |----------|-------------|-----|
@@ -618,10 +610,9 @@ Three scenarios for how April 2026 committee report decisions shape the Swedish
 | **Total** | **100%** | ✓ |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md -->
 
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md)_
-
-## Risk Register
+### Risk Register
 
 | ID | Risk | Dimension | L | I | L×I | Cascade | Probability |
 |----|------|-----------|---|---|-----|---------|-------------|
@@ -634,7 +625,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R7 | Climate-minded voters (C, MP support) defect due to FiU48 fuel subsidy | Electoral | 3 | 3 | 9 | → R1 | Likely [B3] |
 | R8 | Riksrevisionen MJU21 critique amplified into government negligence narrative | Reputational | 3 | 2 | 6 | → R4 | Roughly even [B3] |
 
-## 5×5 L×I Matrix
+### 5×5 L×I Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
@@ -656,7 +647,7 @@ quadrantChart
     R5 - Register delay: [0.3, 0.3]
 ```
 
-## Cascading Risk Chains
+### Cascading Risk Chains
 
 **Primary chain**: R1 (inflation) → R4 (electoral framing) → R7 (climate voter defection)
 - FiU48 fuel tax cut risks Riksbank concern → triggers S/MP criticism → splits rural vs. urban/educated voter coalitions
@@ -667,7 +658,7 @@ quadrantChart
 - Practical impact: Polisen/Åklagarmyndigheten face legal uncertainty in major digital seizure cases
 - Severity: MEDIUM — operational legal issue, not a political crisis
 
-## Posterior Probabilities
+### Posterior Probabilities
 
 | Scenario | Prior | Conditional update | Posterior |
 |----------|-------|-------------------|-----------|
@@ -675,17 +666,16 @@ quadrantChart
 | KU33 second vote passes post-election | 60% | +20% if Tidö coalition wins; −40% if S wins | 20–80% range |
 | Opposition fiscal framing dominates campaign | 40% | +20% if public polling shows household debt rising | 60% |
 
-## Evidence Sources
+### Evidence Sources
 
 All risk assessments grounded in: HD01FiU48 [A1] (fiscal data); HD01KU33 [A1] (constitutional process); HD01MJU21 [A1] (climate audit); Structural analysis [B3] for electoral impacts.
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md)_
+### SWOT Matrix
 
-## SWOT Matrix
-
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 - **Responsive fiscal governance**: HD01FiU48 demonstrates Tidö coalition's ability to deploy emergency tools to protect households from energy price shocks; politically effective pre-election signal [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se]
 - **Housing market modernization**: CU27+CU28 close significant anti-money laundering and consumer protection gaps in the Swedish property market, building on Tidö's stated agenda to combat organized crime [HD01CU27, HD01CU28, riksdagen.se]
@@ -693,45 +683,44 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 - **CRPD alignment**: CU22 (ställföreträdarskap reform) demonstrates Sweden's commitment to CRPD obligations, improving trust among disability rights advocates [HD01CU22, riksdagen.se]
 - **Deregulation signals**: SfU20, TU16 exemplify practical removal of ineffective administrative burdens — demonstrates competent, evidence-based governance [HD01SfU20, HD01TU16, riksdagen.se]
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 - **Fiscal credibility risk**: FiU48's SEK 4.1bn budget weakening in an election year may undermine the coalition's credibility on fiscal discipline — a key differentiator from S-led alternatives [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se; fiscal risk based on structural analysis B3]
 - **Constitutional second-vote dependency**: KU33/KU32 remain dormant until post-election second vote — the legislation is constitutionally fragile and dependent on political continuity; any government change could undo both [HD01KU33, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]
 - **Agricultural climate transition failure**: MJU21 Riksrevisionen audit signals inadequate state support for agriculture's climate shift — a weakness in the government's environmental credibility, especially with C and MP voters [HD01MJU21, riksdagen.se]
 - **Bostadsrättsregister implementation risk**: CU28's register construction begins 1 January 2027 — post-election; implementation complications would become next government's problem and a campaign accountability issue [HD01CU28, riksdagen.se]
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 - **Election-year tangible delivery**: Seven out of ten measures take effect before or near the September 2026 election — unprecedented wave of tangible legislative delivery creates voter perception of a productive government [HD01FiU48, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD01MJU19, HD01SfU20, HD01TU16, riksdagen.se]
 - **Housing market anti-crime narrative**: CU27's identity/lagfart requirements and bostadsrättsombildning rules play directly into the government's core crime-fighting narrative, popular across partisan divides [HD01CU27, riksdagen.se]
 - **Digital state modernization**: The constitutional framework changes (KU33, KU32) and the planned e-legitimation (HD01TU21 — not yet adopted) together build a modern digital Sweden narrative [HD01KU33, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]
 - **Nordic/EU alignment**: MJU19 waste law reform, KU32 accessibility requirements align Sweden with EU policy mainstreams — reduces isolation risk and demonstrates international responsibility [HD01MJU19, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 - **Opposition fiscal attack surface**: S, V, MP will use FiU48's SEK 4.1bn cost as evidence of irresponsible pre-election spending; Riksbank could provide implicit support for this critique if it comments on inflationary risk [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se; electoral analysis B3]
 - **Climate backlash on fuel tax cuts**: The drivmedelsskatt cut (FiU48) directly contradicts climate-science consensus on carbon pricing; environmental movement and MP/C will make this a campaign issue; potential EU scrutiny if cuts undercut energy taxation directive minimum levels [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se]
 - **Constitutional overreach perception**: KU33's restriction of offentlighetsprincipen in criminal investigations could be framed as erosion of transparency — historically a sensitive issue in Sweden [HD01KU33, riksdagen.se; civil society analysis C3]
 - **Riksrevisionen agriculture critique**: If MJU21 report receives wide media coverage, it feeds an election narrative of Tidö coalition sacrificing long-term climate goals for short-term rural constituency appeasement [HD01MJU21, riksdagen.se]
 
-## TOWS Strategic Matrix
+### TOWS Strategic Matrix
 
 | | Opportunities | Threats |
 |---|---|---|
 | **Strengths** | S-O: Use responsive fiscal governance + housing market delivery as election campaign centrepieces; lead with crime-fighting + household economics narrative | S-T: Proactively communicate climate transition support via agriculture programs to pre-empt Riksrevisionen criticism; brief Riksbank on FiU48 temporary nature |
 | **Weaknesses** | W-O: Frame CU28 register as phased delivery — first vote wins before election, full implementation follows | W-T: Address constitutional fragility of KU33/KU32 by seeking cross-party commitments on second vote; reduce exposure if broad support confirmed |
 
-## Cross-SWOT Interference
+### Cross-SWOT Interference
 
 The most important interference: **FiU48 (Strength: fiscal responsiveness) × MJU21 (Weakness: agriculture climate failure)** — both relate to energy and agriculture. If voters simultaneously receive fuel tax relief AND hear Riksrevisionen criticism of agricultural climate transition support, cognitive dissonance may weaken both messages. The government needs to separate these narratives temporally.
 
 **Admiralty evidence annotation**: All primary evidence rows cite `dok_id` from riksdagen.se [A1]. Interpretive rows annotated [B3] or [C3] where inferential.
 
 ## Threat Analysis
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md)_
-
-## Political Threat Taxonomy
+### Political Threat Taxonomy
 
 | Threat | Taxonomy | Severity | Actor | Source |
 |--------|----------|----------|-------|--------|
@@ -742,7 +731,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | T5: Agricultural climate transition fails — Sweden misses EU targets | Environmental governance threat | MEDIUM | Government, farming lobby | HD01MJU21 [A1] |
 | T6: Energy price volatility recurs after fuel subsidy period ends (1 Oct 2026) | Economic stability threat | MEDIUM | Energy markets | HD01FiU48 [A1] |
 
-## Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fiscal Populism)
+### Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fiscal Populism)
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#C62828","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#7F0000","lineColor":"#EF9A9A","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
@@ -767,7 +756,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style E fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## TTP Analysis (Political)
+### TTP Analysis (Political)
 
 | TTP | Technique | Tactic | Impact |
 |-----|-----------|--------|--------|
@@ -776,22 +765,21 @@ flowchart TD
 | TTP-03 | Residency requirement for ombildning | Prevent conversion manipulation | Tenant protection/enforcement [HD01CU27] |
 | TTP-04 | Digital seizure non-classification | Protect investigations from FOI | Reduced transparency [HD01KU33] |
 
-## Post-Election Constitutional Scenario
+### Post-Election Constitutional Scenario
 
 If S forms government in October 2026, the second vote on KU33 (TF) may be refused:
 - Law enforcement digital investigation framework reverts to pre-2026 uncertainty
 - Civil society may paradoxically benefit from transparency perspective
 - Tidoe coalition would criticize S for weakening crime-fighting capabilities
 
-## Evidence Sources
+### Evidence Sources
 
 All threat assessments grounded in primary documents: HD01FiU48 [A1], HD01KU33 [A1], HD01KU32 [A1], HD01CU27 [A1], HD01MJU21 [A1]. Electoral/political analysis [B3].
 
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01CU22
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01CU22
 **Title**: Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på
@@ -800,7 +788,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **DIW Tier**: L2 Strategic — Major legal guardianship reform affecting vulnerable adults
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen approved a comprehensive reform of the Swedish ställföreträdarskap (legal guardianship/administratorship) system:
 - Clearer mandate boundaries for gode män (advisors) and förvaltare (administrators)
@@ -809,7 +797,7 @@ Riksdagen approved a comprehensive reform of the Swedish ställföreträdarskap
 - National ställföreträdarregister (register) for all appointed representatives
 - Most changes: 1 July 2026; register: 1 January 2028
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 The ställföreträdarskap system affects ~100,000+ adults in Sweden who lack legal capacity to fully manage their own affairs (due to cognitive impairment, mental illness, or age-related incapacity). The existing system has faced criticism for quality inconsistency, lack of oversight, and inadequate protection of individuals' autonomy rights. This reform addresses Sweden's obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which Sweden ratified.
 
@@ -817,8 +805,7 @@ Primary: `HD01CU22` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU22, datum 2026-04-17 [A1
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU22
 
 ### HD01CU27
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01CU27
 **Title**: Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen
@@ -827,7 +814,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **DIW Tier**: L2+ Priority — Housing market integrity, anti-crime, property ownership transparency
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Document Classification
+### Document Classification
 
 | Dimension | Value |
 |-----------|-------|
@@ -836,7 +823,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 | Riksdag decision | Approved (Riksdagen sa ja) |
 | Implementation date | New property transfer identity rules: 1 July 2026 |
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Two distinct legislative packages approved:
 
@@ -844,7 +831,7 @@ Two distinct legislative packages approved:
 
 2. **Bostadsrättslagen anti-circumvention**: When a housing association converts rental apartments to bostadsrätter, the tenant must have been registered at the address for ≥6 months before the vote to count in the required 2/3 majority threshold. Prevents rapid turnover of residents to facilitate conversions without genuine tenant approval.
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 This reform addresses two distinct but related housing market integrity problems. The identity requirements close an anti-money laundering gap — anonymous property ownership has enabled organized crime asset placement. The 6-month residency requirement for bostadsrättsombildning prevents "straw tenant" schemes where landlords rapidly populate a building with compliant tenants to achieve the 2/3 conversion majority.
 
@@ -854,8 +841,7 @@ Primary: `HD01CU27` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU27, datum 2026-04-17 [A1
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU27
 
 ### HD01CU28
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01CU28
 **Title**: Ett register för alla bostadsrätter
@@ -864,14 +850,14 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **DIW Tier**: L2+ Priority — Major housing market infrastructure reform
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen approved creation of a national register for all bostadsrätter (condominium apartments):
 - Records: apartment details, bostadsrättshavare (title holder), bostadsrättsförening (association), pantsättningar (mortgages/pledges)
 - Purpose: Central registry replacing fragmented association records; modern pledging system (registration replaces association notification)
 - Timeline: Register construction rules from 1 January 2027; remainder from date set by government
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 Sweden currently lacks a national register for bostadsrätter — a major gap compared to the fastighetsregister for ordinary real property. This reform modernizes the bostadsrätt market, improves consumer protection, and creates transparent credit information for banks and buyers. The pledge registration shift (away from notifying the association) eliminates a significant legal uncertainty that has caused disputes.
 
@@ -881,8 +867,7 @@ Primary: `HD01CU28` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU28, datum 2026-04-17 [A1
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28
 
 ### HD01FiU48
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01FiU48
 **Title**: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd
@@ -891,7 +876,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 **DIW Tier**: L2+ Priority — Fiscal policy with immediate household impact and election-year political salience
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1] — Riksdagen primary source, confirmed via API
 
-## Document Classification
+### Document Classification
 
 | Dimension | Value |
 |-----------|-------|
@@ -902,7 +887,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 | Implementation date | Fuel tax: 1 May–30 September 2026; Energy support: covers January–February 2026 |
 | Fiscal impact | −SEK 1.56 bn (revenue loss) + SEK 2.4 bn (new expenditure) = SEK 4.1 bn total fiscal weakening |
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen approved the government's (Tidö coalition) proposal for an emergency supplementary budget 2026 comprising two fiscal measures:
 
@@ -912,13 +897,13 @@ Riksdagen approved the government's (Tidö coalition) proposal for an emergency
 
 **Justification cited by government**: Middle East conflict impact on fuel prices; high electricity/gas prices during harsh January–February 2026 winter.
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 This is a politically significant fiscal intervention just five months before the scheduled September 2026 election. The Tidö coalition (M, SD, KD, L) used the emergency budget mechanism — ordinarily reserved for exceptional circumstances — to deliver direct household price relief. **The timing is strategic**: lower fuel prices and energy support will be visible to voters during the election campaign period.
 
 **Fiscal risk signal**: Weakening the budget balance by SEK 4.1 bn in an election year under existing fiscal constraints will strengthen opposition (S, V, MP) arguments about irresponsible pre-election spending. The Centre Party (C), outside the coalition, has historically opposed fuel tax reductions on climate grounds.
 
-## Stakeholder Impact [A1]
+### Stakeholder Impact [A1]
 
 | Stakeholder | Impact | Confidence |
 |-------------|--------|------------|
@@ -931,25 +916,24 @@ This is a politically significant fiscal intervention just five months before th
 | State finances | Negative — SEK 4.1 bn weakening of financial sparande 2026 | HIGH [A1] |
 | Transport sector (haulage, agriculture) | Positive — diesel reduction significant for commercial operations | MEDIUM [B2] |
 
-## Electoral Connection (2026)
+### Electoral Connection (2026)
 
 This measure will dominate for the next five months of election campaign. Fuel prices are a high-salience kitchen-table issue, especially in rural and suburban Sweden where car dependency is high. The SD party, whose voters over-index in rural areas and among manual workers, gains particular electoral benefit. This is a pre-election fiscal stimulus that risks inflationary pressure and clashes with Riksbank's continued tight monetary stance.
 
-## Confidence Assessment [A1]
+### Confidence Assessment [A1]
 
 - Decision approved: VERY HIGH confidence — confirmed via riksdagen.se
 - Fiscal figures SEK 1.56bn + SEK 2.4bn: VERY HIGH — from government budget proposition text as summarized
 - Electoral impact analysis: MEDIUM — based on public polling trends, structural analysis
 - Opposition response: MEDIUM — based on known party positions, not direct quote from this debate
 
-## Source Chain
+### Source Chain
 
 Primary: `HD01FiU48` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:FiU48, datum 2026-04-21 [A1]
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48
 
 ### HD01KU32
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01KU32
 **Title**: Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier
@@ -958,7 +942,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **DIW Tier**: L2 Strategic — Constitutional amendment enabling EU accessibility compliance for media/digital products
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Document Classification
+### Document Classification
 
 | Dimension | Value |
 |-----------|-------|
@@ -968,7 +952,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 | Riksdag decision | Adopted as vilande |
 | Implementation date | 1 January 2027 (contingent on post-election second vote) |
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen adopted (as vilande) amendments to both Tryckfrihetsförordningen and Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen enabling accessibility requirements to be imposed on constitutionally protected media products:
 - Expands scope for product information requirements on packaging and labelling
@@ -976,7 +960,7 @@ Riksdagen adopted (as vilande) amendments to both Tryckfrihetsförordningen and
 - Allows carriage obligations for accessibility services (captioning, interpretation) from non-public-service broadcasters
 - Purpose: Disability accessibility compliance + EU membership obligations
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 Sweden's constitutional press/speech freedoms have historically created tensions with EU digital single market legislation. This amendment resolves a key legal gap by allowing ordinary law to require accessibility features even on constitutionally protected products. The political debate balances disability rights advocates (supportive) against media freedom purists (cautious). This is also required by EU law — delay could create infringement proceedings.
 
@@ -984,8 +968,7 @@ Primary: `HD01KU32` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:KU32, datum 2026-04-17 [A1
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32
 
 ### HD01KU33
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01KU33
 **Title**: Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan
@@ -994,7 +977,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **DIW Tier**: L2+ Priority — Constitutional law, fundamental rights (offentlighetsprincipen vs. criminal investigation effectiveness)
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Document Classification
+### Document Classification
 
 | Dimension | Value |
 |-----------|-------|
@@ -1005,7 +988,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 | Implementation date | 1 January 2027 (contingent on second vote after 2026 election) |
 | Fiscal impact | None direct |
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen adopted (as vilande/dormant) a government proposal amending Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) to restrict public access to digital materials seized or copied during police searches (husrannsakan). Under the proposed rule:
 - Digital recordings seized/copied in criminal investigations will **not** be classified as public documents (allmänna handlingar)
@@ -1013,7 +996,7 @@ Riksdagen adopted (as vilande/dormant) a government proposal amending Tryckfrihe
 - Exception maintained: if the material is later incorporated into a criminal investigation file, it regains public document status
 - Since this is a grundlagsändring (constitutional amendment), it requires TWO identical Riksdag votes with a Riksdag election between them — this April 2026 vote is the FIRST; the second must come after the September 2026 election
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 **Constitutional significance**: TF amendments are among the most significant legislative acts possible in Sweden. The offentlighetsprincipen (principle of public access) is a cornerstone of Swedish democracy, dating to 1766. Restricting access — even temporarily during criminal investigations — is a major policy choice requiring extraordinary process.
 
@@ -1021,7 +1004,7 @@ Riksdagen adopted (as vilande/dormant) a government proposal amending Tryckfrihe
 
 **Post-election lock-in**: The dormant adoption means the incoming Riksdag after September 2026 must confirm this change. If the political balance shifts (e.g., if S forms government), the second vote could be refused — effectively killing the amendment. This creates electoral stakes around constitutional law.
 
-## Stakeholder Impact
+### Stakeholder Impact
 
 | Stakeholder | Impact | Confidence |
 |-------------|--------|------------|
@@ -1031,7 +1014,7 @@ Riksdagen adopted (as vilande/dormant) a government proposal amending Tryckfrihe
 | Government (Tidö coalition) | Supports — framed as crime-fighting measure | HIGH [A1] |
 | Post-election Riksdag | Critical actor — must adopt second vote to make permanent | HIGH [B2] |
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 - Decision adopted as vilande: VERY HIGH [A1]
 - Implementation contingent on post-election second vote: VERY HIGH [A1]
@@ -1041,8 +1024,7 @@ Primary: `HD01KU33` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:KU33, datum 2026-04-17 [A1
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33
 
 ### HD01MJU19
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01MJU19
 **Title**: Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning
@@ -1051,7 +1033,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 **DIW Tier**: L2 Strategic — EU circular economy compliance, waste legislation reform
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen approved amendments to multiple environmental laws to reduce waste and increase material recycling:
 - Clearer rules on waste responsibility (when it begins, when it ends)
@@ -1060,7 +1042,7 @@ Riksdagen approved amendments to multiple environmental laws to reduce waste and
 - Removal of requirement for state/municipal entities to post financial security for landfill operations
 - Entry into force: 1 July 2026
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 This reform implements EU waste framework directive obligations and contributes to Sweden's circular economy transition. The removal of state/municipal financial security requirements is a practical simplification. Clearer waste responsibility rules reduce legal uncertainty for businesses and municipalities. The timing with 1 July 2026 implementation aligns with broader pre-election regulatory modernization.
 
@@ -1068,8 +1050,7 @@ Primary: `HD01MJU19` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:MJU19, datum 2026-04-16 [
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU19
 
 ### HD01MJU21
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01MJU21
 **Title**: Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser för jordbrukets klimatomställning
@@ -1079,11 +1060,11 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 **Data Depth**: METADATA-ONLY (no summary available in API response)
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen considered Riksrevisionen's report on the state's efforts to support agriculture's climate transition. No full summary available in API; based on metadata and Riksrevisionen standard audit format: the report critically assesses whether government programs effectively support agricultural sector decarbonization, and whether targets under Sweden's climate framework are being met.
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 Riksrevisionen audits trigger parliamentary scrutiny of government program effectiveness. Agricultural climate transition is politically contentious: the Tidö coalition has been perceived as less ambitious on climate than previous S-led government. An audit finding inadequate state support for agricultural climate transition would be politically damaging for the government. The MJU committee would need to respond to Riksrevisionen's recommendations.
 
@@ -1093,8 +1074,7 @@ Primary: `HD01MJU21` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:MJU21, datum 2026-04-20 [
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU21
 
 ### HD01SfU20
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01SfU20
 **Title**: Ett slopat krav på anmälan före ansökan om föräldrapenning
@@ -1103,7 +1083,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsm
 **DIW Tier**: L1 Surface — Administrative simplification, social insurance
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen approved removing the requirement to pre-notify (anmäla) before applying for föräldrapenning (parental benefit):
 - Eliminates bureaucratic pre-notification step
@@ -1111,7 +1091,7 @@ Riksdagen approved removing the requirement to pre-notify (anmäla) before apply
 - Technical corrections to socialförsäkringsbalken for alignment with current legislation
 - Implementation: Removal of notification requirement 1 July 2026; other corrections 31 May 2026 (retroactive to 1 Jan 2026)
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 A clear administrative simplification with broad political support. Forsäkringskassan noted the existing notification requirement no longer serves a control function. Benefits families by reducing bureaucratic burden. Relatively low political salience but exemplifies the government's stated deregulation agenda. Before election, such small welfare improvements help demonstrate competent administration.
 
@@ -1119,8 +1099,7 @@ Primary: `HD01SfU20` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:SfU20, datum 2026-04-16 [
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU20
 
 ### HD01TU16
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md -->
 
 **Dok ID**: HD01TU16
 **Title**: Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning
@@ -1129,14 +1108,14 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 **DIW Tier**: L1 Surface — Road safety regulation, driving license reform
 **Admiralty Source Code**: [A1]
 
-## Summary of Decision
+### Summary of Decision
 
 Riksdagen approved removal of the compulsory introductory course (introduktionsutbildning) for supervised driving practice (övningskörning) for B-licence:
 - Course has been mandatory since 2006 for both learner drivers and supervisors
 - Removal justified by lack of evidence of intended effectiveness in improving practice quality
 - Change takes effect 1 August 2026
 
-## Why It Matters
+### Why It Matters
 
 This deregulation removes a requirement that many families found an unnecessary administrative and cost burden. Traffic safety authorities may have mixed views, but the government's assessment is that the course did not achieve its stated goals. The measure has bipartisan appeal as a common-sense deregulation — reduces cost for young drivers and their families.
 
@@ -1144,18 +1123,17 @@ Primary: `HD01TU16` — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:TU16, datum 2026-04-21 [A1
 URL: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU16
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Methodology**: `analysis/methodologies/electoral-domain-methodology.md`
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Election**: Swedish general election, September 2026
 
-## Context
+### Context
 
 Sweden holds its next general election in September 2026 under the current 4-year electoral cycle (last election September 2022). The April 2026 committee reports batch represents the spring legislative sprint — five months before election day.
 
-## Electoral Impact by Document
+### Electoral Impact by Document
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
@@ -1173,7 +1151,7 @@ quadrantChart
     TU16-Driving Course: [0.3, 0.5]
 ```
 
-## Seat Projection Delta
+### Seat Projection Delta
 
 Current seat distribution (est. post-2022):
 | Block | Approx seats | Change signal from April 2026 |
@@ -1183,7 +1161,7 @@ Current seat distribution (est. post-2022):
 
 Net projection impact: **Marginally positive for coalition** on current evidence, driven by household economics salience (FiU48) outweighing climate concerns (MJU21). However, margin is within polling noise — confidence LOW [C4].
 
-## Key Voter Segments Affected
+### Key Voter Segments Affected
 
 | Segment | Size (est.) | Decision Impact | Direction |
 |---------|------------|-----------------|-----------|
@@ -1193,11 +1171,11 @@ Net projection impact: **Marginally positive for coalition** on current evidence
 | Elderly/guardianship affected | ~100,000 adults + families | LOW | Neutral (CU22 cross-party) |
 | Young drivers (18–25) | ~400,000 | LOW | Slightly positive (TU16 deregulation) |
 
-## Coalition Mathematics Context
+### Coalition Mathematics Context
 
 Constitutional amendments (KU33/KU32) require post-election confirmation — this creates a unique electoral dynamic where the constitutional reform agenda itself becomes a campaign issue. Parties must now campaign on whether they will ratify the second vote.
 
-## Forward Electoral Triggers
+### Forward Electoral Triggers
 
 1. **July 2026**: Party manifestos published — will all parties commit to KU33/KU32 second vote?
 2. **August 2026**: Final Riksbank assessment before election — any inflation signal will hurt coalition
@@ -1207,10 +1185,9 @@ Constitutional amendments (KU33/KU32) require post-election confirmation — thi
 **Overall assessment**: The April 2026 legislative sprint has placed the Tidö coalition in a favorable but not decisive pre-election position. FiU48 is the most potent tool — but fiscal and climate narratives will contest its effectiveness. Confidence: MEDIUM [B3].
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md)_
-
-## Current Seat Distribution (2022 election result)
+### Current Seat Distribution (2022 election result)
 
 | Party | Block | Seats | Share |
 |-------|-------|-------|-------|
@@ -1227,7 +1204,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 *Source: valmyndigheten.se election 2022 [A1 equivalent]*
 
-## Pivotal Vote Analysis for Constitutional Amendments
+### Pivotal Vote Analysis for Constitutional Amendments
 
 For KU33 and KU32 to pass the **second vote** in the post-election Riksdag:
 - Required: Absolute majority in new Riksdag (175+ seats of 349)
@@ -1242,7 +1219,7 @@ For KU33 and KU32 to pass the **second vote** in the post-election Riksdag:
 | S + M grand coalition | Ja | Ja | Grand coalition rare but possible |
 | S + C + MP | Nej | Ja | Environmental parties oppose KU33 |
 
-## Sainte-Laguë Sensitivity Analysis
+### Sainte-Laguë Sensitivity Analysis
 
 Seat distribution is sensitive to minor parties near the 4% threshold. Featherstone scenarios:
 - If MP falls below 4%: seats redistribute; likely benefits S or C; opposition loses 18 seats net
@@ -1250,15 +1227,14 @@ Seat distribution is sensitive to minor parties near the 4% threshold. Featherst
 
 Current April 2026 polls suggest both major blocks remain near 50/50 with election outcome highly uncertain. The April 2026 legislative sprint (FiU48 energy support) is a deliberate attempt to move this balance.
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 Seat numbers from official 2022 election [A1]. Polling projections for 2026 based on structural analysis [B3]. Constitutional second-vote mechanics confirmed from KU33/KU32 text [A1].
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md)_
-
-## Demographic Segmentation
+### Demographic Segmentation
 
 | Segment | Estimated size | Primary concern | Relevance to this batch | Direction |
 |---------|--------------|----------------|------------------------|-----------|
@@ -1271,7 +1247,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | Farming sector | ~80,000 workers | Rural subsidies, climate | MJU21 (Riksrevisionen critique), FiU48 diesel | Mixed |
 | Young adults (18–30) | ~900,000 | Housing, employment | CU28 (future homebuyers), TU16 | +Coalition mild |
 
-## Regional Segmentation
+### Regional Segmentation
 
 | Region type | Primary driver | April 2026 relevance |
 |------------|----------------|---------------------|
@@ -1280,27 +1256,26 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | Gothenburg/Malmö | Manufacturing, crime, energy | FiU48 moderate; CU27 moderate |
 | Smaland/rural south | Farming, car dependency | FiU48 high; MJU21 negative |
 
-## Baseline Positions on Key Issues
+### Baseline Positions on Key Issues
 
 For a "procedural day" baseline (no specific legislation): rural Sweden = SD/M stronghold; urban educated = MP/S/C stronghold. The April 2026 batch reinforces these patterns — FiU48 advantages SD/M rural support while climate costs continue to disadvantage them with urban educated.
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 Segmentation estimates based on SCB population data [B2] and Swedish Election Research Program (VALU) typical voter distribution [B3]. Size estimates are approximations; directional signals are more reliable than exact numbers.
 
 Evidence basis: HD01FiU48 [A1], HD01CU27/28 [A1], HD01CU22 [A1], HD01MJU21 [A1]
 
 ## Comparative International
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md -->
 
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md)_
-
-## Comparator Set
+### Comparator Set
 
 **Comparator set**: Norway (NO), Denmark (DK), Finland (FI) — Nordic baseline; Germany (DE) — EU major economy energy policy comparator; European Union level — constitutional accessibility obligations
 
 ---
 
-## Comparative Table
+### Comparative Table
 
 | Jurisdiction | Measure | Analogous Policy | Similarity Score | Key Difference |
 |-------------|---------|-----------------|-----------------|----------------|
@@ -1311,17 +1286,17 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | EU level | KU32 — accessibility for media | EU: European Accessibility Act (EAA) Directive 2019/882 | Direct transposition | SE constitutional protection required extraordinary process (vilande); other MS implemented directly |
 | EU level | MJU19 — waste reform | EU: Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC (revised 2018) | Direct transposition | SE late implementation (2026 vs. 2018/2022 deadline) |
 
-## Outside-In Analysis
+### Outside-In Analysis
 
-### What Sweden can learn from Germany's Tankrabatt (DE → SE)
+#### What Sweden can learn from Germany's Tankrabatt (DE → SE)
 
 Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt lasted 90 days, cost ~€3.1bn, was fiercely contested by environmental groups, and was not renewed. Sweden's FiU48 fuel cut runs 153 days (1 May–30 Sep 2026) at ~SEK 1.5bn revenue loss — similar proportional cost. **German lesson**: The subsidy boosted German election-year approval for the governing coalition (SPD-led) but delivered marginal inflation impact and was criticized by Bundesbank as market-distorting. Sweden should note: Riksbank has an independent mandate and may similarly signal concern. DE experience suggests subsidy expires cleanly if political will holds — but pre-election extensions are tempting (DE did not extend; risk that SE may).
 
-### Norway's experience with constitutional-level media law
+#### Norway's experience with constitutional-level media law
 
 Norway revised its Grunnloven (constitution) in 2014–2016 to better accommodate EU media regulation, using a similar two-vote process. **Norwegian lesson**: The Norwegian constitutional amendments took three years from first to second vote (vs. Sweden's planned 6-month turnaround driven by election cycle). Constitutional speed in Sweden is driven by election scheduling rather than deliberation quality — a procedural risk if legal tensions emerge between KU33 and existing JO/HD jurisprudence.
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 - Comparative fiscal measures (FiU48 vs. NO/DE): HIGH [B2] — based on public data from NO/DE treasury announcements
 - Constitutional comparisons: MEDIUM [B3] — based on general knowledge of Nordic constitutional processes
@@ -1330,10 +1305,9 @@ Norway revised its Grunnloven (constitution) in 2014–2016 to better accommodat
 **Comparator rows**: 6 (meets minimum 2 requirement per gate check)
 
 ## Historical Parallels
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md -->
 
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md)_
-
-## Primary Parallel: 1994 TF Constitutional Reform Process
+### Primary Parallel: 1994 TF Constitutional Reform Process
 
 **Parallel document**: KU33/KU32 — vilande constitutional amendments on TF and YGL
 
@@ -1341,7 +1315,7 @@ The 1994 Fundamental Law (TF) reforms followed an identical two-Riksdag procedur
 
 **Lesson for 2026**: When constitutional amendments align with broad modernization narratives (digital era access to public documents), they typically survive election transitions even when the sponsoring government changes. Confidence: MEDIUM [B2].
 
-## Secondary Parallel: Energy Price Crisis Response 2021–2022
+### Secondary Parallel: Energy Price Crisis Response 2021–2022
 
 **Parallel document**: HD01FiU48 — SEK 4.1bn emergency energy/fuel budget amendment
 
@@ -1349,7 +1323,7 @@ Sweden enacted emergency household energy support in Q4 2021 and Q1 2022 under t
 
 **Lesson for 2026**: Emergency fuel/energy support packages immediately before elections have significant polling effect in Sweden — particularly in rural constituencies. FiU48 replicates this strategy from the government side, not opposition side. [B3]
 
-## Tertiary Parallel: Anti-Money-Laundering Property Reforms (2018–2022)
+### Tertiary Parallel: Anti-Money-Laundering Property Reforms (2018–2022)
 
 **Parallel document**: HD01CU27/CU28 — AML property safeguards
 
@@ -1357,13 +1331,13 @@ Following FATF's 2017 evaluation that rated Sweden's real estate AML compliance
 
 **Precedent**: Similar multi-cycle AML reforms in Denmark (2018) and Finland (2020) took 3–4 years to fully implement and faced industry resistance at each stage. Swedish reforms track the Nordic pattern closely.
 
-## Quaternary Parallel: Guardianship Reform Process 2011–2017
+### Quaternary Parallel: Guardianship Reform Process 2011–2017
 
 **Parallel document**: HD01CU22 — Ställföreträdarskap reform
 
 Sweden's 2011 Föräldrabalken guardianship reforms also proceeded incrementally over multiple sessions. The current CU22 reform represents a third generation of reform (2011 → 2017 → 2026 trajectory), each adding CRPD compliance layers. This incremental pattern suggests continued reform in 2027–2028 regardless of which government takes office.
 
-## Confidence Matrix
+### Confidence Matrix
 
 | Parallel | Recency | Evidence | Confidence |
 |---------|---------|----------|------------|
@@ -1373,10 +1347,9 @@ Sweden's 2011 Föräldrabalken guardianship reforms also proceeded incrementally
 | Guardianship reform | 9 years | Swedish statute history [A1] | HIGH [B2] |
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md)_
-
-## Feasibility Scorecard
+### Feasibility Scorecard
 
 | Document | Implementation type | Risk level | Key bottleneck | Feasibility |
 |----------|--------------------|-----------|--------------|----|
@@ -1391,9 +1364,9 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 | HD01SfU20 | Civil preparedness update | LOW | Existing MSB infrastructure | HIGH |
 | HD01TU16 | Driver education deregulation | LOW | Transport agency rule update | HIGH |
 
-## Critical Path Analysis
+### Critical Path Analysis
 
-### CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister IT System
+#### CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister IT System
 Most complex single implementation item. Sweden's existing property registries are managed by Lantmäteriet; integrating bostadsrätt ownership is novel. Risks:
 - GDPR-compliant data architecture required (personal data + ownership records)
 - Industry resistance from HSB, Riksbyggen, SBC (>700,000 bostadsrätter)
@@ -1402,7 +1375,7 @@ Most complex single implementation item. Sweden's existing property registries a
 
 **Feasibility assessment**: MEDIUM — technically achievable but procurement and compliance delays likely push full implementation to 2027–2028.
 
-### CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet
+#### CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet
 Creating a new oversight authority requires:
 - Government proposition 2026/27 (next parliament)
 - Appropriations from Riksdag
@@ -1411,10 +1384,10 @@ Creating a new oversight authority requires:
 
 **Feasibility assessment**: LOW in the immediate term; MEDIUM over 2027–2028 horizon. Likely requires next government commitment regardless of election outcome.
 
-### KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments
+#### KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments
 Purely procedural; no administration required. The second vote is a Riksdag decision, not an executive implementation task. Risk is political (election outcome) not administrative.
 
-## Resource Requirements Summary
+### Resource Requirements Summary
 
 | Resource type | High demand items | Estimated cost |
 |--------------|-------------------|---------------|
@@ -1427,12 +1400,11 @@ Purely procedural; no administration required. The second vote is a Riksdag deci
 Confidence: Implementation cost estimates are structural [B3]; IT cost estimates are high-uncertainty [C4].
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md -->
 
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md)_
+### ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses
 
-## ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses
-
-### Hypothesis H1: FiU48 is Primarily About Electoral Strategy, Not Genuine Crisis Management
+#### Hypothesis H1: FiU48 is Primarily About Electoral Strategy, Not Genuine Crisis Management
 
 **Claim**: The emergency budget mechanism is being misused for electoral purposes — the "extraordinary circumstances" threshold for extra ändringsbudget is not genuinely met; Middle East conflict and winter energy prices would have normalized without intervention.
 
@@ -1450,7 +1422,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-### Hypothesis H2: KU33 (TF Digital Seizure Amendment) is a Disproportionate Restriction on Offentlighetsprincipen
+#### Hypothesis H2: KU33 (TF Digital Seizure Amendment) is a Disproportionate Restriction on Offentlighetsprincipen
 
 **Claim**: The proposed TF amendment restricting public access to seized digital materials goes further than law enforcement operational need requires and systematically reduces transparency in criminal investigations in ways that could protect government officials from accountability.
 
@@ -1468,7 +1440,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-### Hypothesis H3: CU27/CU28 Housing Reforms Will Not Significantly Reduce Money Laundering
+#### Hypothesis H3: CU27/CU28 Housing Reforms Will Not Significantly Reduce Money Laundering
 
 **Claim**: The property identity requirements (CU27) and bostadsrättsregister (CU28) address surface-level transparency but do not target the sophisticated layering structures used by organized crime networks, which use legitimate legal entities to obscure ultimate beneficial ownership.
 
@@ -1486,7 +1458,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Red Team Challenge
+### Red Team Challenge
 
 **Challenge to lead finding**: The dominant intelligence picture frames FiU48 as the most significant decision. A red team analyst might argue that **KU33 is actually more consequential long-term** because:
 1. Constitutional amendments are extremely hard to reverse (unlike budget measures)
@@ -1495,7 +1467,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 **Red team conclusion**: Both FiU48 (high short-term electoral significance) and KU33 (high long-term constitutional significance) deserve P0 treatment. The framing of FiU48 as "lead story" is justified for election-year purposes but understates the structural importance of KU33.
 
-## Rejected Alternatives
+### Rejected Alternatives
 
 | Alternative | Reason Rejected |
 |-------------|----------------|
@@ -1504,10 +1476,9 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | MJU19 waste reform will face industry opposition | EU-mandate driven; major industry players already aligned; implementation practical |
 
 ## Classification Results
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md -->
 
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md)_
-
-## 7-Dimension Classification
+### 7-Dimension Classification
 
 | Dimension | HD01FiU48 | HD01KU33 | HD01KU32 | HD01CU27 | HD01CU28 | HD01CU22 | HD01MJU21 | HD01MJU19 | HD01SfU20 | HD01TU16 |
 |-----------|-----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|-----------|-----------|----------|---------|
@@ -1519,7 +1490,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **6. EU dimension** | Yes (energy directive) | No | Yes (EU accessibility) | No direct | No direct | CRPD indirect | EU climate | EU circular economy | No | No |
 | **7. Election signal** | Strong positive | Moderate | Neutral | Positive | Positive | Neutral | Negative potential | Neutral | Positive | Positive |
 
-## Priority Tiers
+### Priority Tiers
 
 | Tier | Documents | Justification |
 |------|-----------|---------------|
@@ -1528,7 +1499,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **P2 — Significant** | HD01KU32, HD01CU22, HD01MJU21, HD01MJU19 | Important legislative/EU compliance/audit significance |
 | **P3 — Background** | HD01SfU20, HD01TU16 | Administrative simplification; low controversy |
 
-## Retention & Access
+### Retention & Access
 
 | Classification | Value |
 |----------------|-------|
@@ -1537,40 +1508,39 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | GDPR Article 9 | Not applicable — no individual political opinion data; party positions are public |
 | Sensitivity | Standard public intelligence |
 
-## Source Classification
+### Source Classification
 
 All documents: Primary public source [A1] — Riksdagen API (data.riksdagen.se), confirmed via MCP at 2026-04-23T04:45Z
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)_
+### Policy Clusters
 
-## Policy Clusters
-
-### Cluster 1: Election-Year Fiscal and Energy Policy
+#### Cluster 1: Election-Year Fiscal and Energy Policy
 - **Primary**: HD01FiU48 (Extra ändringsbudget)
 - **Related**: HD01MJU21 (agricultural energy/climate — MJU scrutiny), HD01MJU19 (waste/circular economy EU compliance)
 - **Tension**: FiU48 fuel tax cuts vs. MJU19/MJU21 environmental ambition
 - **Theme**: Household economics vs. long-term climate policy trade-off
 
-### Cluster 2: Constitutional Modernization Package
+#### Cluster 2: Constitutional Modernization Package
 - **Primary**: HD01KU33 (TF — beslag/husrannsakan digital insyn)
 - **Related**: HD01KU32 (TF+YGL — tillgänglighetskrav medier)
 - **Link**: Both are vilande grundlagsändringar decided in same KU session; both require post-election second vote
 - **Theme**: Digital-era constitutional adaptation — crime-fighting efficiency × fundamental freedoms
 
-### Cluster 3: Housing Market Transparency and Anti-Crime
+#### Cluster 3: Housing Market Transparency and Anti-Crime
 - **Primary**: HD01CU27 (Identitetskrav lagfart + bostadsrättslagen)
 - **Related**: HD01CU28 (Nationellt bostadsrättsregister)
 - **Link**: Both CU committee; complementary measures; both effective before/around election
 - **Theme**: Property market integrity, anti-money laundering, consumer protection
 
-### Cluster 4: Social Welfare and Administrative Reform
+#### Cluster 4: Social Welfare and Administrative Reform
 - **Primary**: HD01CU22 (Ställföreträdarskap)
 - **Related**: HD01SfU20 (Föräldrapenning), HD01TU16 (Körkort)
 - **Theme**: State service simplification, CRPD compliance, administrative deregulation
 
-## Legislative Chains
+### Legislative Chains
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
@@ -1604,24 +1574,23 @@ flowchart LR
     style ENERGY fill:#FF8F00,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Coordinated Activity Patterns
+### Coordinated Activity Patterns
 
 The April 2026 legislative sprint shows coordinated committee scheduling:
 - FiU (FiU48) + KU (KU33, KU32) + CU (CU27, CU28, CU22) all reporting in the same week of 17–21 April 2026
 - Pattern: Government tabling and committee approval synchronized for maximum legislative throughput before the summer recess and election campaign
 - This is not unusual: the spring riksmöte sprint is standard, but the political salience of this year's package is higher than typical due to election-year timing
 
-## Sibling Folder Citations
+### Sibling Folder Citations
 
 No sibling analysis folders present for this date (first run). Future Tier-C aggregation should reference:
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/` if props workflow runs same day
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/evening-analysis/` for synthesis integration
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md)_
-
-## ICD 203 Compliance Audit
+### ICD 203 Compliance Audit
 
 | ICD 203 Standard | Compliance | Notes |
 |-----------------|------------|-------|
@@ -1635,7 +1604,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | 8. Structured analytic techniques | PASS | 10 SAT techniques applied |
 | 9. Accurate information collection | PASS | All dok_ids verified via riksdagen.se API 2026-04-23 |
 
-## Confidence Distribution
+### Confidence Distribution
 
 | Level | Count | Pct |
 |-------|-------|-----|
@@ -1645,7 +1614,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | LOW | 3 | 13% |
 | VERY LOW | 0 | 0% |
 
-## SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques)
+### SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques)
 
 | Technique | Applied In |
 |-----------|-----------|
@@ -1660,18 +1629,18 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Comparative International | comparative-international.md (6 comparators) |
 | Historical Parallels | historical-parallels.md |
 
-## Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle
+### Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle
 
-### Improvement 1: Full Text for High-DIW Documents
+#### Improvement 1: Full Text for High-DIW Documents
 HD01MJU21 was METADATA-ONLY. Next cycle: get_dokument_innehall with include_full_text: true for all L2+ documents (DIW >= 10) to improve evidence quality.
 
-### Improvement 2: Vote Record Enrichment
+#### Improvement 2: Vote Record Enrichment
 No get_voteringar calls in this run. For FiU48 and KU33/KU32 vilande votes, party-by-party records would confirm partisan alignment and elevate confidence from B3 to B2.
 
-### Improvement 3: Anforanden Integration
+#### Improvement 3: Anforanden Integration
 Use search_anforanden for FiU48 debates to obtain direct MP quotes, transforming unnamed party position claims into attributed statements with higher evidence quality.
 
-## Party Neutrality Arithmetic
+### Party Neutrality Arithmetic
 
 | Party | Favorable | Critical | Balance |
 |-------|-----------|----------|---------|
@@ -1685,8 +1654,7 @@ Use search_anforanden for FiU48 debates to obtain direct MP quotes, transforming
 | C | 1 | 1 | Balanced |
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Workflow**: news-committee-reports
 **Run ID**: 24817022343
@@ -1697,7 +1665,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Riksdag Session**: 2025/26
 **MCP Status**: live (riksdag-regering: OK, sync confirmed 2026-04-23T04:39:41Z)
 
-## Document Table
+### Document Table
 
 | dok_id | Title | Committee | Date | Type | Data Depth | URL |
 |--------|-------|-----------|------|------|-----------|-----|
@@ -1716,7 +1684,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Full text available**: 0 (API confirms fulltext_available=true; not fetched in this run to preserve rate limits)
 **Summary available**: 9/10 (HD01MJU21 has no summary — METADATA-ONLY)
 
-## MCP Server Notes
+### MCP Server Notes
 
 - `riksdag-regering` MCP: Available and live; sync at 2026-04-23T04:39:41Z
 - Retrieval performed via `get_betankanden` + `search_dokument` + `get_dokument_innehall`
@@ -1724,8 +1692,45 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - `world-bank` MCP: Not queried in this manifest phase
 - IMF data: Not queried in this manifest phase
 
-## Data Quality
+### Data Quality
 
 - All 10 documents confirmed from riksdagen.se primary source [A1] per Admiralty Code
 - Zero hallucinated dok_ids — all verified via API response
 - Article date 2026-04-23 is current; lookback not required (multiple documents from 2026-04-14 to 2026-04-21)
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/article.md
index 10aff2a975..4012de5b9d 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-23
 subfolder: month-ahead
 slug: 2026-04-23-month-ahead
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.914Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.712Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md -->
 
 **Classification**: Public | **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Period**: 2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31 | **Session**: Riksmöte 2025/26 (final spring phase)
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with three interlocking packages dominating the legislative agenda: the 2026 Spring Fiscal Package (HD03100 vårproposition + HD0399 supplementary budget), a Law & Order Package consolidating the Tidöavtalet's criminal justice agenda, and an Energy Transition Package restructuring the electricity market. All three packages will receive final votes before the summer recess, with the vårproposition setting Sweden's fiscal trajectory through a pre-election period of moderate economic recovery and heightened defence spending.
 
@@ -42,7 +41,7 @@ Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with thr
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Editorial priority-setting**: Which legislative package deserves the deepest coverage during the April-May 2026 session? (Answer: Spring Fiscal Package — broadest societal impact, sets 2026-2027 parameters)
 2. **Political risk monitoring**: Where are the most significant coalition stress points likely to emerge before the September 2026 election?
@@ -50,7 +49,7 @@ Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with thr
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ 60-Second Read
+### ⚡ 60-Second Read
 
 - **Fiscal**: Vårproposition HD03100 projects continued recovery (GDP growth recovering from -0.20% in 2023 to 0.82% in 2024); defence spending elevated; energy cost relief via HD03236 (fuel tax cut May–September 2026, energy price support Jan–Feb 2026 retroactively); net fiscal cost ~4.1 billion SEK. Riksdagen's Finance Committee (FiU) already passed HD01FiU48 on 2026-04-21.
 - **Justice**: HD03218 (double sentences for gang crime), HD03246 (youth offenders), HD03217 (civil servant liability), HD03235 (deportation) — all scheduled for spring votes. V, C, and MP have filed opposing motions on deportation; V and MP oppose arms regulation changes.
@@ -60,13 +59,13 @@ Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with thr
 
 ---
 
-## 🔑 Top Forward Trigger
+### 🔑 Top Forward Trigger
 
 **Watch**: Riksdagen vote on HD0399 Vårändringsbudget (expected late May 2026) — if S, V, MP, and C vote against the budget jointly, this signals maximum pre-election opposition unity and provides electoral narrative heading into summer.
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 DIW Priority Ranking
+### 📊 DIW Priority Ranking
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -98,7 +97,7 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## 🔒 Confidence Profile
+### 🔒 Confidence Profile
 
 - **Overall assessment confidence**: HIGH
 - **Economic data confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (World Bank 2024 data, vårproposition not yet full-text parsed)
@@ -108,14 +107,13 @@ quadrantChart
 **Admiralty Code**: [B2] — Reliable source, confirmed by multiple independent parliamentary documents
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23 | **Period**: Apr 23 – May 31, 2026
 
 ---
 
-## Lead Story: Spring Fiscal Package Sets Pre-Election Economic Narrative
+### Lead Story: Spring Fiscal Package Sets Pre-Election Economic Narrative
 
 The Tidökoalition's 2026 Spring Fiscal Package — comprising HD03100 (vårproposition), HD0399 (vårändringsbudget), and HD03236 (extra ändringsbudget, already passed 2026-04-21 via HD01FiU48) — is the most consequential legislative cluster of the spring session. Sweden's GDP growth recovered from -0.20% in 2023 to 0.82% in 2024 (World Bank), and Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson's vårproposition charts a course toward continued but cautious recovery. The extra ändringsbudget cuts energy tax on petrol and diesel by 82 öre/litre and 319 SEK/m³ respectively for May–September 2026, costing approximately 1.56 billion SEK in lost revenue while providing ~2.4 billion SEK in energy price support — net fiscal deterioration of ~4.1 billion SEK in 2026. The Middle East conflict and high electricity prices in early 2026 are cited as justification [HD01FiU48, B2].
 
@@ -123,7 +121,7 @@ The Tidökoalition's 2026 Spring Fiscal Package — comprising HD03100 (vårprop
 
 ---
 
-## Integrated Intelligence Picture
+### Integrated Intelligence Picture
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -178,7 +176,7 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## DIW-Weighted Document Ranking
+### DIW-Weighted Document Ranking
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title | DIW Tier | Priority Rationale |
 |------|--------|-------|----------|--------------------|
@@ -195,20 +193,20 @@ graph TB
 
 ---
 
-## Thematic Synthesis
+### Thematic Synthesis
 
-### Theme 1: Pre-Election Fiscal Management
+#### Theme 1: Pre-Election Fiscal Management
 The government faces a classic pre-election dilemma: demonstrate competent stewardship while providing voter-visible relief. The fuel tax cut (82 öre/litre on petrol) directly targets working-class and rural voters who depend on private transport. Critics from S, V, and MP argue this contradicts climate commitments and is fiscally irresponsible. The vårproposition must balance defence spending growth (NATO commitments) with popular relief measures amid a fiscal framework whose surplus target becomes politically relevant if overshoot signals austerity.
 
-### Theme 2: Law & Order Election Platform
+#### Theme 2: Law & Order Election Platform
 The Tidöavtalet's criminal justice agenda achieves its most concentrated legislative expression in May 2026. Double sentences for gang crime, stricter youth offender rules, expanded public servant accountability, and tighter deportation rules collectively form the government's most politically coherent package. With SD's support secured, these measures will pass — but V, C (partially), and MP opposition creates a clear left-right cleavage the Social Democrats can exploit.
 
-### Theme 3: Energy Market Transformation
+#### Theme 3: Energy Market Transformation
 The electricity laws package (HD03240) represents the most structurally significant legislation of the session. New market architecture, a dedicated environmental permitting authority (replacing regional boards for large projects), and mandatory revenue-sharing for wind power municipalities alter the investment landscape for both renewable energy and fossil fuel alternatives.
 
 ---
 
-## AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 - **Suggested SEO title**: "Sweden's Parliament: Five Weeks of Budget, Crime, and Energy Votes Before Summer Recess"
 - **Meta description (158 chars)**: "Swedish parliament votes on the spring fiscal package, gang crime double penalties, and electricity market reform in the final five weeks before the 2026 election campaign."
@@ -216,8 +214,7 @@ The electricity laws package (HD03240) represents the most structurally signific
 - **Secondary keywords**: vårproposition 2026, Swedish election 2026, Swedish energy reform
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Classification**: PUBLIC — Offentlighetsprincipen basis; data from open Riksdag sources
@@ -225,7 +222,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
 > **KJ-1** (Likely / [B2]): The Tidökoalitionen will complete the 2025/26 spring session with its three core legislative packages (Spring Fiscal, Law & Order, Energy Transition) largely intact, giving PM Kristersson a "delivery" narrative ahead of the September 2026 general election.
 
@@ -239,7 +236,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Profile
+### Confidence Profile
 
 | KJ | WEP Band | Kent % | Admiralty | Basis |
 |----|----------|--------|-----------|-------|
@@ -251,7 +248,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C Requirement)
+### Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C Requirement)
 
 **Carried-forward PIRs from prior analytical cycle**:
 
@@ -269,7 +266,7 @@ This analysis is the first run of the 2026-04-23 period. No prior-cycle month-ah
 
 ---
 
-## Intelligence Gaps
+### Intelligence Gaps
 
 | Gap | Description | Implication |
 |-----|-------------|-------------|
@@ -281,7 +278,7 @@ This analysis is the first run of the 2026-04-23 period. No prior-cycle month-ah
 
 ---
 
-## Collection Requirements for Next Cycle
+### Collection Requirements for Next Cycle
 
 1. Monitor C parliamentary group statements on HD03235 (weekly)
 2. Monitor JuU committee hearing schedule for HD03218 (next 2 weeks)
@@ -290,12 +287,11 @@ This analysis is the first run of the 2026-04-23 period. No prior-cycle month-ah
 5. Track NATO/SACEUR announcements on HD03220 deployment timeline
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## DIW Scoring Framework
+### DIW Scoring Framework
 
 | Dimension | Description | Weight |
 |-----------|-------------|--------|
@@ -305,7 +301,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Ranked DIW Scores
+### Ranked DIW Scores
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title | D | I | W | DIW Score | Tier | Evidence |
 |------|--------|-------|---|---|---|-----------|------|----------|
@@ -329,7 +325,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Sensitivity Analysis
+### Sensitivity Analysis
 
 **If vårproposition projects GDP contraction**: Significance of HD03100 rises to DIW 10.0 — entire fiscal framework under threat, opposition gains electoral momentum.
 
@@ -339,7 +335,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Significance Distribution
+### Significance Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -353,7 +349,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Pass-2 Improvement Notes
+### Pass-2 Improvement Notes
 
 - Evidence Admiralty codes added to each ranked item
 - Sensitivity analysis expanded to three scenarios
@@ -361,12 +357,11 @@ xychart-beta
 - DIW weights explicitly defined and applied consistently [Methodology per synthesis-methodology.md]
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Party Framing Map
+### Party Framing Map
 
 | Party | Core narrative frame | Key evidence |
 |-------|---------------------|-------------|
@@ -381,7 +376,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Press Framing (Expected)
+### Press Framing (Expected)
 
 | Media type | Expected angle | Basis |
 |------------|---------------|-------|
@@ -392,7 +387,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Media Risk Indicators
+### Media Risk Indicators
 
 1. **Women's shelter story** (HD10438) — high viral potential; human interest angle; negative for government
 2. **Fuel tax cut = climate betrayal** framing — sustained NGO campaign likely through summer
@@ -401,17 +396,16 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Admiralty**: [C3] — media framing projections; no actual press coverage reviewed (open-access Swedish press not queried)
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: 6-lens stakeholder impact matrix per stakeholder-impact.md template
 
 ---
 
-## Stakeholder Impact Matrix
+### Stakeholder Impact Matrix
 
-### 6 Lenses
+#### 6 Lenses
 
 1. **Government/Coalition** — Tidökoalitionen (M+KD+L+SD support)
 2. **Opposition** — S, V, MP, C (outside coalition)
@@ -422,7 +416,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-### Lens 1: Government/Coalition
+#### Lens 1: Government/Coalition
 
 | Actor | Role | Impact | Stance | Admiralty |
 |-------|------|--------|--------|-----------|
@@ -435,7 +429,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-### Lens 2: Opposition
+#### Lens 2: Opposition
 
 | Actor | Role | Impact | Stance | Admiralty |
 |-------|------|--------|--------|-----------|
@@ -446,7 +440,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-### Lens 3: Citizens
+#### Lens 3: Citizens
 
 | Group | Impact | Concern | Admiralty |
 |-------|--------|---------|-----------|
@@ -460,7 +454,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-### Lens 4: International Actors
+#### Lens 4: International Actors
 
 | Actor | Impact | Stance | Admiralty |
 |-------|--------|--------|-----------|
@@ -473,7 +467,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-### Lens 5: Institutions
+#### Lens 5: Institutions
 
 | Institution | Impact | Stance | Admiralty |
 |-------------|--------|--------|-----------|
@@ -485,7 +479,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-### Lens 6: Civil Society
+#### Lens 6: Civil Society
 
 | Actor | Impact | Stance | Admiralty |
 |-------|--------|--------|-----------|
@@ -497,7 +491,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Influence Network
+### Influence Network
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -532,15 +526,14 @@ graph TD
 ```
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Gate requirement**: ≥10 indicators with date patterns across 4 horizons
 
 ---
 
-## Indicator Set
+### Indicator Set
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected date | Horizon | Significance | Admiralty |
 |---|-----------|--------------|---------|-------------|-----------|
@@ -568,7 +561,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Indicator Dashboard
+### Indicator Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 gantt
@@ -594,15 +587,14 @@ gantt
 ```
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: strategic-extensions-methodology.md — F3EAD Exploit→Analyze
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Framing
+### Scenario Framing
 
 **Central Question**: What are the dominant alternative futures for Sweden's political landscape by May 31, 2026 (end of spring session)?
 
@@ -611,7 +603,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Set (3 Alternatives — Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)
+### Scenario Set (3 Alternatives — Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)
 
 | Scenario | Name | WEP Probability | Admiralty |
 |----------|------|-----------------|-----------|
@@ -623,7 +615,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Likely — 60%)
+### Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Likely — 60%)
 
 **Narrative**: The Tidökoalitionen manages SD support and keeps C/L on key votes. The full Law & Order Package passes JuU; the Energy Transition Package passes NU+MJU. SD accepts HD03235 deportation rules as "adequate first step." C supports HD03235 after amendment to require systematic + repeated crime threshold (per motion HD024095). The vårproposition (HD03100) and supplementary budget (HD0399) pass FiU with government majority. PM Kristersson enters the summer break with three legislative packages delivered.
 
@@ -642,7 +634,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario S-2: Legislative Fracture (Unlikely — 25%)
+### Scenario S-2: Legislative Fracture (Unlikely — 25%)
 
 **Narrative**: C withdraws support for HD03235 over proportionality concerns (motion HD024095 rejected by coalition). V and MP join S in a surprise vote defeating HD03235. Alternatively, HD0399 fails because SD demands amendments on welfare cuts that M rejects. The government is forced into extended committee negotiations, delaying one or more packages past the May 31 session-end.
 
@@ -660,7 +652,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Remote — 10%)
+### Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Remote — 10%)
 
 **Narrative**: External shock — Russia escalates Baltic Sea military activity following HD03220 deployment in Finland; energy price spike driven by Middle East escalation; or IMF revises Sweden growth outlook sharply negative after Q1 data — forces government to abandon normal spring session schedule. Emergency session called; fiscal framework revised; Riksdag recess cancelled.
 
@@ -678,7 +670,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Probability Validation
+### Scenario Probability Validation
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Scenario Probability Distribution (% of futures)
@@ -690,15 +682,14 @@ pie title Scenario Probability Distribution (% of futures)
 **Confidence assessment**: [C2] — Assessed from public parliamentary record; coalition defection risks inferred from motion/interpellation patterns. External shock probability based on geopolitical baseline, not confirmed intelligence.
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: 5-dimension × 5-level Likelihood × Impact register per political-risk-methodology.md
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Register
+### Risk Register
 
 | ID | Risk | Domain | L (1–5) | I (1–5) | Score | Tier |
 |----|------|--------|---------|---------|-------|------|
@@ -715,7 +706,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 5×5 Risk Heat Map
+### 5×5 Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -751,20 +742,20 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Cascading Risk Chains
+### Cascading Risk Chains
 
-### Chain 1: Fiscal Dominoes
+#### Chain 1: Fiscal Dominoes
 **R09** (GDP revision down) → **R01** (budget defeat risk rises) → Opposition exploits fiscal weakness → **R04** (SD demands more) → Coalition credibility crisis ahead of September election
 
-### Chain 2: Law & Order Backlash
+#### Chain 2: Law & Order Backlash
 **R02** (deportation court challenge) → EU compliance pressure → **R05** (sentencing proportionality) → Government retreats on headline policy → SD loses confidence in coalition effectiveness
 
-### Chain 3: Energy–Climate Conflict
+#### Chain 3: Energy–Climate Conflict
 **R03** (high energy prices) → Government doubles down on fossil fuel relief → **T3 from SWOT** (climate credibility gap) → EU / international criticism → Election-year reputational damage
 
 ---
 
-## Posterior Probability Estimates
+### Posterior Probability Estimates
 
 | Risk | Prior Probability | Updating Event | Posterior |
 |------|------------------|----------------|-----------|
@@ -774,14 +765,13 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Notes
+### Confidence Notes
 
 All risk assessments are based on public parliamentary documents. Likelihood scores reflect political dynamics observable from parliamentary record; they are not probabilistic models.  
 **Admiralty Code**: [B2] — Reliable source, confirmed by multiple independent documents.
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Scope**: Tidökoalitionen's legislative agenda, April 23 – May 31, 2026
@@ -789,9 +779,9 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## SWOT Matrix
+### SWOT Matrix
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |---|----------|----------|-----------|
@@ -801,7 +791,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | S4 | NATO integration (HD03220) enjoys broad cross-party support — even S voted for NATO accession in 2022; Finnish forward presence strengthens Nordic-Baltic deterrence | riksdagen.se/HD03220; cross-party context from 2022 NATO vote | [B2] |
 | S5 | Strong institutional capacity — Finance Committee (FiU) processed extra ändringsbudget within 8 days of submission; committee system functioning effectively | HD01FiU48 dated 2026-04-21 vs HD03236 dated 2026-04-13 | [A1] |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 | # | Weakness | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |---|----------|----------|-----------|
@@ -810,7 +800,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | W3 | Police shortage undermines law & order narrative — interpellation HD10439 (Mattias Vepsä, S) highlights persistent regional gaps despite achievement of 10,000 police recruitment target | HD10439 filed 2026-04-20: BRÅ evaluation noted gaps in Stockholm deployment | [A2] |
 | W4 | Women's shelters closures contradict gender equality strategy — interpellation HD10438 documents closure of multiple shelters while HD03245 positions government as champion of women's safety | HD10438 (Sofia Amloh, S → Nina Larsson, L) filed 2026-04-17 | [A2] |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |---|-------------|----------|-----------|
@@ -819,7 +809,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | O3 | Condominium register (HD01CU28) + identity requirements (HD01CU27) address housing market opacity — government can position these as anti-crime/anti-money-laundering measures | HD01CU28 passed 2026-04-17; HD01CU27 effective 2026-07-01 | [A1] |
 | O4 | Interoperability proposal (HD03244) builds digital government credentials — data-sharing modernisation positions Sweden at EU NIS2/data-act frontier | riksdagen.se/HD03244; EU regulatory alignment context | [B2] |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 | # | Threat | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |---|--------|----------|-----------|
@@ -830,7 +820,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## TOWS Matrix
+### TOWS Matrix
 
 | | **Strengths (S1–S5)** | **Weaknesses (W1–W4)** |
 |---|----------------------|----------------------|
@@ -839,7 +829,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-SWOT Interference
+### Cross-SWOT Interference
 
 - S2 (extra budget passed) **amplifies** T3 (climate credibility gap) — the fastest legislative win is simultaneously the most environmentally damaging symbol
 - W4 (shelter closures) **directly contradicts** S1 (law & order coherence) — the government's own social safety net strategy undermines its gender equality narrative
@@ -847,7 +837,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## SWOT Visualisation
+### SWOT Visualisation
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -880,17 +870,16 @@ quadrantChart
 ```
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Political Threat Taxonomy per political-threat-framework.md
 
 ---
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy
+### Political Threat Taxonomy
 
-### Category I: Legislative Threats
+#### Category I: Legislative Threats
 
 | Threat ID | Threat | Actor | Vector | Severity |
 |-----------|--------|-------|--------|----------|
@@ -898,14 +887,14 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | LT-02 | Constitutional amendment (HD01KU33 — digital seizure) requires second reading after 2026 election | KU process | Constitutional procedural constraint | MEDIUM |
 | LT-03 | V/C/MP jointly amend or defeat HD03235 deportation rules | V+C+MP | Opposition motions HD024090, HD024095, HD024097 | HIGH |
 
-### Category II: Institutional Threats
+#### Category II: Institutional Threats
 
 | Threat ID | Threat | Actor | Vector | Severity |
 |-----------|--------|-------|--------|----------|
 | IT-01 | New environmental permitting authority (HD03238) faces delay — conflicts with existing Naturvårdsverket authority | Bureaucratic | Implementation gap | MEDIUM |
 | IT-02 | Riksrevisionen (National Audit Office) broadens fiscal scrutiny scope — second report (HD03241) triggers parliamentary accountability hearings | Riksrevisionen | Audit findings | MEDIUM |
 
-### Category III: Electoral Threats
+#### Category III: Electoral Threats
 
 | Threat ID | Threat | Actor | Vector | Severity |
 |-----------|--------|-------|--------|----------|
@@ -913,7 +902,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | ET-02 | SD outbids M/KD/L on crime/immigration hardness, eroding coalition right flank | SD | Media positioning | MEDIUM |
 | ET-03 | MP and V campaign on climate rollback (HD03236 fuel tax cut) — younger urban voters shift | MP+V | Campaign framing | MEDIUM |
 
-### Category IV: External/Security Threats
+#### Category IV: External/Security Threats
 
 | Threat ID | Threat | Actor | Vector | Severity |
 |-----------|--------|-------|--------|----------|
@@ -923,7 +912,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Attack Tree — ET-01 (Opposition Coordinated Interpellation Campaign)
+### Attack Tree — ET-01 (Opposition Coordinated Interpellation Campaign)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -960,7 +949,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Kill Chain Analysis — LT-01 (Budget Defeat)
+### Kill Chain Analysis — LT-01 (Budget Defeat)
 
 | Phase | Description | Current State |
 |-------|-------------|---------------|
@@ -973,7 +962,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Context)
+### MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Context)
 
 | TTP-ID | Technique | Example |
 |--------|-----------|---------|
@@ -987,15 +976,14 @@ graph TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD03100
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03100-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **dok_id**: HD03100 | **Tier**: L3 (full analysis)
 
 ---
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 **Title**: Proposition 2025/26:100 — Vårpropositionen 2026 (Spring Fiscal Policy Bill)
 **Filed by**: Regeringen (Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson, M)
@@ -1006,7 +994,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 
 1. GDP growth revised upward from 2025/26 budget assumptions — World Bank data confirms +0.82% 2024
 2. Fiscal space identified for spring relief measures (HD03236 fuel tax, retroactive energy support)
@@ -1015,7 +1003,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Political Context
+### Political Context
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Admiralty |
 |-----------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -1026,7 +1014,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## DIW Score
+### DIW Score
 
 | Dimension | Score | Rationale |
 |-----------|-------|-----------|
@@ -1037,7 +1025,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Flags
+### Risk Flags
 
 - R-01: Revenue miss → fiscal adjustment (see risk-assessment.md)
 - R-06: EU fiscal rules scrutiny
@@ -1045,8 +1033,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — primary source, directly from Riksdagen API
 
 ### HD03217
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03217-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03217-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03217 | **Tier**: L2
 
@@ -1056,8 +1043,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03217-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **BLUF**: Expands criminal liability for public officials for abuse of office. Strengthens public sector accountability. DIW Score: 4.8/10 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 
 ### HD03218
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03218-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03218-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03218 | **Tier**: L2+
 
@@ -1075,8 +1061,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03218-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Admiralty**: [A1]
 
 ### HD03220
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03220-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03220-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03220 | **Tier**: L2
 
@@ -1090,8 +1075,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03220-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Risk**: Russian diplomatic reaction (XT-01 in threat-analysis.md) possible.
 
 ### HD03235
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03235-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03235-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03235 | **Tier**: L2+
 
@@ -1109,8 +1093,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03235-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Admiralty**: [A1] + [C2] for legal risk assessment
 
 ### HD03236
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03236-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03236 | **Tier**: L2+ | **Status**: ENACTED via HD01FiU48 (2026-04-21)
 
@@ -1127,8 +1110,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Admiralty**: [A1] — enacted law; primary source confirmed.
 
 ### HD03238
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03238-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03238-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03238 | **Tier**: L2
 
@@ -1139,8 +1121,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03238-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Implementation risk**: New agency start-up — HIGH institutional risk (see implementation-feasibility.md)
 
 ### HD03239
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03239-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03239-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03239 | **Tier**: L2
 
@@ -1150,8 +1131,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03239-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **BLUF**: Introduces mandatory revenue sharing between wind power developers and host municipalities. Addresses "not in my backyard" opposition. DIW Score: 5.8/10 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 
 ### HD03240
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03240-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03240-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03240 | **Tier**: L2+
 
@@ -1169,8 +1149,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03240-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Admiralty**: [A1]
 
 ### HD03246
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03246-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03246-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03246 | **Tier**: L2
 
@@ -1183,8 +1162,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03246-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Opposition**: S+V+MP oppose on rehabilitation grounds. C silent.
 
 ### HD0399
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD0399-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD0399-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD0399 | **Tier**: L3
 
@@ -1205,76 +1183,74 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD0399-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 **Admiralty**: [A1]
 
 ### cluster\-remaining
-
-_Source: [`documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-23 | **Tier**: L2 cluster
 
 ---
 
-## HD03228 — Modernised Arms Export Rules
+### HD03228 — Modernised Arms Export Rules
 **Committee**: UU | **DIW**: 5.0 | **Admiralty**: [A1]
 Opposition motions: HD024091 (V — stricter controls), HD024096 (MP — human rights conditionality)
 **BLUF**: Updates Swedish arms export framework; modernises KIMAB oversight.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03232 — International Tribunal for Ukraine
+### HD03232 — International Tribunal for Ukraine
 **Committee**: UU | **DIW**: 5.2 | **Admiralty**: [A1]
 **BLUF**: Sweden accedes to international tribunal mechanism for Ukraine war crimes accountability.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03231 — Ukraine Compensation Commission
+### HD03231 — Ukraine Compensation Commission
 **Committee**: UU | **DIW**: 4.5 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 **BLUF**: Sweden joins compensation mechanism for Ukrainian civilian losses.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03245 — Women's Rights Strategy
+### HD03245 — Women's Rights Strategy
 **Committee**: AU | **DIW**: 4.2 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 **Tension**: HD10438 interpellation notes women's shelters closing simultaneously — implementation gap.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03242 — Forestry Environmental Rules
+### HD03242 — Forestry Environmental Rules
 **Committee**: MJU | **DIW**: 3.8 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 **BLUF**: Revises forest environmental requirements; industry/NGO tension.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03237 — Paid Police Training
+### HD03237 — Paid Police Training
 **Committee**: JuU | **DIW**: 3.5 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 **BLUF**: Officers receive pay during training; addresses recruitment/retention gap.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03244 — Government Interoperability
+### HD03244 — Government Interoperability
 **Committee**: TU | **DIW**: 3.2 | **Admiralty**: [B2]
 **BLUF**: Mandates interoperability between government IT systems.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03233 — Medical Technology Accessibility
+### HD03233 — Medical Technology Accessibility
 **Committee**: SoU | **DIW**: 3.5 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 **BLUF**: Improves patient access to medical technologies; disability rights impact.
 
 ---
 
-## HD03243 — Tax Adjustment Measure
+### HD03243 — Tax Adjustment Measure
 **Committee**: SkU | **DIW**: 3.0 | **Admiralty**: [A2]
 **BLUF**: Technical tax adjustment; low political salience.
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: electoral-domain-methodology.md
 
 ---
 
-## Election Context
+### Election Context
 
 **Election date**: 2026-09-13 (Sunday)
 **Days remaining**: ~143 days from 2026-04-23
@@ -1282,7 +1258,7 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Current Parliamentary Composition (Approximate — 2022 Election Result)
+### Current Parliamentary Composition (Approximate — 2022 Election Result)
 
 | Party | Bloc | Seats (2022) | Status |
 |-------|------|-------------|--------|
@@ -1306,7 +1282,7 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Spring 2026 Package Electoral Implications
+### Spring 2026 Package Electoral Implications
 
 | Package | Electoral target group | Expected impact |
 |---------|----------------------|-----------------|
@@ -1317,30 +1293,30 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Viability Scenarios (September 2026)
+### Coalition Viability Scenarios (September 2026)
 
-### Scenario A: Tidökoalitionen continues (requires ~175+ seats)
+#### Scenario A: Tidökoalitionen continues (requires ~175+ seats)
 - Current estimated seats: 176 (bare majority)
 - If M gains 3–5 seats from delivering on fiscal promises: +3 seats
 - If SD holds: stays at 73
 - If L holds (currently fragile at 16 seats — 4% threshold): critical
 - **Risk**: L polling near 4% threshold — loss of L would drop bloc to 160 seats
 
-### Scenario B: S-led bloc majority
+#### Scenario B: S-led bloc majority
 - Current: 173 seats
 - If MP survives 4% threshold: stays at 18 seats
 - If V holds at 24: bloc stays at 173
 - If C swings back toward centre-left: potentially +10–15 seats
 - **Key swing factor**: C — if C moves toward S collaboration, S-led bloc reaches 175+
 
-### Scenario C: Cross-bloc grand coalition
+#### Scenario C: Cross-bloc grand coalition
 - Only if A and B both fail to reach 175
 - Historical precedent: Sweden has managed minority configurations but not grand coalitions in modern era
 - Probability: Remote [D4]
 
 ---
 
-## Electoral Risk Assessment
+### Electoral Risk Assessment
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -1353,12 +1329,11 @@ xychart-beta
 **Highest risk parties**: L (threshold risk), MP (threshold risk), C (swing potential)
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Current Riksdag Seat Distribution
+### Current Riksdag Seat Distribution
 
 | Party | Seats | Bloc |
 |-------|-------|------|
@@ -1377,7 +1352,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills)
+### Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills)
 
 | Bill | Ja needed | Gov (M+KD+L+SD) | S | V | C | MP | Outcome |
 |------|-----------|------------------|---|---|---|----|---------|
@@ -1390,7 +1365,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Sainte-Laguë Projection (September 2026 — Illustrative)
+### Sainte-Laguë Projection (September 2026 — Illustrative)
 
 Assuming 5% threshold applies. Illustrative scenarios only (no polling data — [D4]):
 
@@ -1405,12 +1380,11 @@ Assuming 5% threshold applies. Illustrative scenarios only (no polling data —
 **Admiralty**: [D4] — No polling data; pure structural projection.
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Segment Matrix
+### Segment Matrix
 
 | Segment | Description | Key policy concern | Package impact | Likely shift |
 |---------|-------------|-------------------|---------------|-------------|
@@ -1425,7 +1399,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Electoral Volatility Map
+### Electoral Volatility Map
 
 High-volatility segments (most likely to switch):
 1. **Young urban** — 15% shift potential toward left-green bloc if climate framing dominates
@@ -1435,15 +1409,14 @@ High-volatility segments (most likely to switch):
 **Admiralty**: [C3] — Segment analysis derived from policy content + demographic inference; no direct polling data available (Gap G-2 in intelligence-assessment.md)
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: strategic-extensions-methodology.md — comparative analysis
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator Selection
+### Comparator Selection
 
 Two comparator jurisdictions selected per methodology requirements:
 1. **Norway (NO)** — Nordic peer; similar energy economy, minority government history
@@ -1451,12 +1424,12 @@ Two comparator jurisdictions selected per methodology requirements:
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator 1: Norway
+### Comparator 1: Norway
 
-### Context
+#### Context
 Norway's Ap-Sp minority government under PM Jonas Gahr Støre faced energy price shock politics in 2022–24. The government implemented temporary electricity price subsidies (strømstøtte) directly analogous to Sweden's retroactive energy price support in HD01FiU48 and HD0399.
 
-### Key parallels with Swedish HD0399/HD03236
+#### Key parallels with Swedish HD0399/HD03236
 
 | Dimension | Sweden 2026 | Norway 2022–24 |
 |-----------|-------------|----------------|
@@ -1473,12 +1446,12 @@ Norway's Ap-Sp minority government under PM Jonas Gahr Støre faced energy price
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator 2: Germany
+### Comparator 2: Germany
 
-### Context
+#### Context
 Germany's Ampelkoalition (SPD+Greens+FDP) collapsed in November 2024 over a budget dispute. FDP withdrew from coalition when SPD proposed debt brake suspension. Germany held snap elections February 2025, producing CDU/CSU-led coalition.
 
-### Key parallels with Swedish SD support dynamics
+#### Key parallels with Swedish SD support dynamics
 
 | Dimension | Sweden 2026 | Germany 2024–25 |
 |-----------|-------------|-----------------|
@@ -1494,9 +1467,9 @@ Germany's Ampelkoalition (SPD+Greens+FDP) collapsed in November 2024 over a budg
 
 ---
 
-## EU Policy Context
+### EU Policy Context
 
-### EU Climate Law vs HD03236
+#### EU Climate Law vs HD03236
 
 Sweden's fuel tax cut (82 öre/litre petrol) runs against EU Fit for 55 trajectory. EU Climate Law 2021/1119 requires progressive decarbonisation. While the measure does not formally violate current directives (Sweden retains national competence on fuel taxes until ETS2 2027), it sends a negative signal ahead of:
 - ETS2 carbon pricing implementation (2027)
@@ -1506,7 +1479,7 @@ Sweden's fuel tax cut (82 öre/litre petrol) runs against EU Fit for 55 trajecto
 
 ---
 
-## NATO Eastern Flank Comparison
+### NATO Eastern Flank Comparison
 
 | Country | Forward presence deployment | Date |
 |---------|----------------------------|------|
@@ -1520,12 +1493,11 @@ Sweden's contribution is consistent with Allied commitments but smaller in scale
 **Admiralty**: [B2]
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 1: 2010 Alliansen Pre-Election Spring Session
+### Parallel 1: 2010 Alliansen Pre-Election Spring Session
 
 **Date**: Spring 2010 — 5 months before September 2010 election
 **Government**: Alliansen (M+C+L+KD) under PM Fredrik Reinfeldt
@@ -1543,7 +1515,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Crisis 2021
+### Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Crisis 2021
 
 **Date**: June 2021
 **Government**: S-MP minority under PM Stefan Löfven
@@ -1562,21 +1534,20 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Lessons Applied
+### Lessons Applied
 
 1. Pre-election "delivery" narratives can secure re-election (Alliansen 2010 precedent suggests yes — won September 2010)
 2. Single party defection in minority parliament was survivable in 2021; 2026 coalition has more buffer
 3. Fuel tax cuts as pre-election "gift" have Norwegian precedent of temporary relief → future reversal = political cost
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Assessment by Package
+### Feasibility Assessment by Package
 
-### Package A: Spring Fiscal (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236)
+#### Package A: Spring Fiscal (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Risk | Admiralty |
 |-----------|-----------|------|-----------|
@@ -1589,7 +1560,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-### Package B: Law & Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235, HD03237)
+#### Package B: Law & Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235, HD03237)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Risk | Admiralty |
 |-----------|-----------|------|-----------|
@@ -1602,7 +1573,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-### Package C: Energy Transition (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238, HD03242)
+#### Package C: Energy Transition (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238, HD03242)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Risk | Admiralty |
 |-----------|-----------|------|-----------|
@@ -1615,7 +1586,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Key Implementation Risks Summary
+### Key Implementation Risks Summary
 
 | Risk | Package | Severity |
 |------|---------|---------|
@@ -1627,23 +1598,22 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Admiralty**: [B2-C2] depending on dimension
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) per strategic-extensions-methodology.md
 
 ---
 
-## Purpose
+### Purpose
 
 This document stress-tests the dominant assessment (Scenario S-1: Stable Close) by systematically examining three competing hypotheses. Each hypothesis is evaluated against available evidence.
 
 ---
 
-## Hypothesis Matrix
+### Hypothesis Matrix
 
-### H-1: SD withdrawal is imminent (contradicts S-1)
+#### H-1: SD withdrawal is imminent (contradicts S-1)
 
 **Hypothesis**: SD will withdraw support before May 31, triggering a government confidence crisis.
 
@@ -1663,7 +1633,7 @@ This document stress-tests the dominant assessment (Scenario S-1: Stable Close)
 
 ---
 
-### H-2: Centre's (C) selective opposition is strategic — they will ultimately vote with government
+#### H-2: Centre's (C) selective opposition is strategic — they will ultimately vote with government
 
 **Hypothesis**: C's formal opposing motions (HD024095 on HD03235) are positional theatre — they will ultimately support the government to preserve governing influence.
 
@@ -1682,7 +1652,7 @@ This document stress-tests the dominant assessment (Scenario S-1: Stable Close)
 
 ---
 
-### H-3: The fuel tax cut (HD03236) is already enacted — its political consequences are front-loaded
+#### H-3: The fuel tax cut (HD03236) is already enacted — its political consequences are front-loaded
 
 **Hypothesis**: Because HD01FiU48 enacted the fuel tax cut on 2026-04-21, the political salience of this issue is already priced in. There will be no further material opposition effect in the remaining 38-day window.
 
@@ -1700,7 +1670,7 @@ This document stress-tests the dominant assessment (Scenario S-1: Stable Close)
 
 ---
 
-## ACH Consistency Matrix
+### ACH Consistency Matrix
 
 | Evidence Item | H-1 (SD withdraws) | H-2 (C theatrics) | H-3 (Front-loaded) |
 |--------------|--------------------|--------------------|---------------------|
@@ -1713,22 +1683,21 @@ This document stress-tests the dominant assessment (Scenario S-1: Stable Close)
 
 ---
 
-## Conclusions
+### Conclusions
 
 1. **S-1 (Stable Close) remains the dominant scenario** — all three devil's advocate hypotheses either fail to dislodge it (H-1) or are partially compatible with it (H-2, H-3).
 2. **Highest residual risk**: C tactical voting (H-2) — if C defects fully on HD03235, the deportation bill may fail. Probability: 10–15%.
 3. **Lowest risk domain**: Fuel tax cut (H-3) — already enacted; legislative risk is closed.
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: 7-dimension political classification per political-classification-guide.md
 
 ---
 
-## Classification Dimensions
+### Classification Dimensions
 
 1. **Issue Area** (policy domain)
 2. **Ideological Positioning** (left-right, libertarian-authoritarian)
@@ -1740,7 +1709,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Per-Document Classification
+### Per-Document Classification
 
 | dok_id | Issue Area | Ideological Positioning | Legislative Stage | Urgency | Partisan Alignment | Constitutional | Public Salience | Admiralty |
 |--------|-----------|------------------------|-------------------|---------|-------------------|----------------|-----------------|-----------|
@@ -1767,7 +1736,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Issue Area Clustering
+### Issue Area Clustering
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Issue Area Distribution (20 documents)
@@ -1783,7 +1752,7 @@ pie title Issue Area Distribution (20 documents)
 
 ---
 
-## Ideological Spectrum Map
+### Ideological Spectrum Map
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -1798,7 +1767,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Constitutional Sensitivity Summary
+### Constitutional Sensitivity Summary
 
 | Category | Count | Examples |
 |----------|-------|---------|
@@ -1807,17 +1776,16 @@ xychart-beta
 | Ordinary law | 17 | All others |
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Generated**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: structural-metadata-methodology.md
 
 ---
 
-## Policy Clusters
+### Policy Clusters
 
-### Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package
+#### Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package
 
 | dok_id | Title summary | Link |
 |--------|--------------|------|
@@ -1830,7 +1798,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-### Cluster B — Law & Order Package
+#### Cluster B — Law & Order Package
 
 | dok_id | Title summary | Link |
 |--------|--------------|------|
@@ -1844,7 +1812,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-### Cluster C — Energy Transition Package
+#### Cluster C — Energy Transition Package
 
 | dok_id | Title summary | Link |
 |--------|--------------|------|
@@ -1857,7 +1825,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-### Cluster D — Defence & Foreign Affairs
+#### Cluster D — Defence & Foreign Affairs
 
 | dok_id | Title summary | Link |
 |--------|--------------|------|
@@ -1868,7 +1836,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-### Cluster E — Social & Welfare
+#### Cluster E — Social & Welfare
 
 | dok_id | Title summary | Link |
 |--------|--------------|------|
@@ -1878,7 +1846,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Legislative Chain Diagram
+### Legislative Chain Diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1904,7 +1872,7 @@ graph LR
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-Reference to Sibling Analysis Folders
+### Cross-Reference to Sibling Analysis Folders
 
 **Tier-C Aggregation Note**: This is the first run of 2026-04-23. No prior-cycle sibling analysis folders exist under `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/` at time of writing. When parallel workflows run (propositions, committee-reports, interpellations, evening-analysis), this cross-reference map should be updated to link:
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/` — single-type proposition analysis
@@ -1920,7 +1888,7 @@ For PIR continuity, carry-forward from prior monthly analysis:
 
 ---
 
-## Interpellation → Minister Mapping
+### Interpellation → Minister Mapping
 
 | Interpellation | Filed by | Target Minister | Policy Cluster |
 |----------------|----------|-----------------|----------------|
@@ -1938,7 +1906,7 @@ For PIR continuity, carry-forward from prior monthly analysis:
 
 ---
 
-## Opposing Motions → Proposition Mapping
+### Opposing Motions → Proposition Mapping
 
 | Motion | Filed by | Against | Policy Cluster |
 |--------|----------|---------|----------------|
@@ -1953,12 +1921,11 @@ For PIR continuity, carry-forward from prior monthly analysis:
 | HD024098 | MP | HD03236 fuel tax | Climate |
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## ICD 203 Audit
+### ICD 203 Audit
 
 ICD 203 establishes 9 analytic standards. Below is the audit for this analysis:
 
@@ -1978,7 +1945,7 @@ ICD 203 establishes 9 analytic standards. Below is the audit for this analysis:
 
 ---
 
-## SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Required)
+### SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Required)
 
 | # | Technique | Applied In | Notes |
 |---|-----------|------------|-------|
@@ -1998,26 +1965,26 @@ ICD 203 establishes 9 analytic standards. Below is the audit for this analysis:
 
 ---
 
-## Methodology Improvements Identified
+### Methodology Improvements Identified
 
-### Improvement 1: Real-time committee schedule integration
+#### Improvement 1: Real-time committee schedule integration
 **Problem**: The analysis cannot identify precise chamber vote dates because the Riksdag calendar API returned HTML rather than JSON. This creates a timing gap — we know bills are in committee but not when they come to a floor vote.  
 **Recommendation**: Implement a retry/fallback parser for the calendar endpoint that handles HTML responses; or periodically scrape the public calendar page for key bills.  
 **Impact**: Would improve TIMELINESS (S-3) and enable forward indicators with precise dates.
 
-### Improvement 2: Swedish opinion poll data integration
+#### Improvement 2: Swedish opinion poll data integration
 **Problem**: The election-2026-analysis.md and voter-segmentation.md artifacts rely on document-derived inferences for voter sentiment, not actual polling data. No Swedish polling MCP tool is currently available.  
 **Recommendation**: Integrate a public polls aggregator (e.g., Wikipedia Swedish polls page or Statistikon.se) into the download pipeline.  
 **Impact**: Would improve KEY JUDGMENTS confidence by grounding KJ-1 and KJ-2 in real voter sentiment data.
 
-### Improvement 3: Riksdag vote record cross-reference
+#### Improvement 3: Riksdag vote record cross-reference
 **Problem**: The coaliti on-mathematics.md seat table uses approximate figures (M≈69, S≈105, SD≈73) rather than verified current Riksdag membership. Vacancies, absences, or changes since election could affect pivotal vote counts.  
 **Recommendation**: Call `get_ledamot` API for all 349 current seats and compute exact party tallies; cross-reference with known departures/appointments.  
 **Impact**: Would improve PRECISION of coalition mathematics and avoid reporting approximation as fact.
 
 ---
 
-## Limitations
+### Limitations
 
 1. **Calendar API failure**: Committee hearing dates and floor vote dates are approximate/inferred. See G-1 in intelligence-assessment.md.
 2. **No polling data**: Public opinion analysis uses structural/legislative inference, not survey data.
@@ -2026,7 +1993,7 @@ ICD 203 establishes 9 analytic standards. Below is the audit for this analysis:
 
 ---
 
-## Tradecraft Context
+### Tradecraft Context
 
 This analysis applies OSINT methodology per ICD 203, using:
 - **Source authority**: Riksdag API (primary), World Bank data, published motions/interpellations
@@ -2037,8 +2004,7 @@ This analysis applies OSINT methodology per ICD 203, using:
 ---
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Workflow**: news-month-ahead
 **Run ID**: 24810574623
@@ -2048,7 +2014,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Lookback Window**: Current session riksmöte 2025/26 (recent 30 days)
 **Analysis Period**: 2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31 (38 days)
 
-## MCP Server Availability
+### MCP Server Availability
 
 | Server | Status | Retries | Notes |
 |--------|--------|---------|-------|
@@ -2056,7 +2022,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | world-bank | ✅ Live | 0 | GDP growth + inflation retrieved |
 | scb | Not queried | — | Not required for month-ahead scope |
 
-## Primary Legislative Corpus (Propositions — L2/L2+/L3)
+### Primary Legislative Corpus (Propositions — L2/L2+/L3)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Type | Department | Date | Tier |
 |--------|-------|------|------------|------|------|
@@ -2081,7 +2047,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03233 | Regler mot bedrägerier via elektroniska kommunikationer | prop | Finansdepartementet | 2026-04-14 | L2 |
 | HD03243 | Förbättrade regler för tonnagebeskattning | prop | Finansdepartementet | 2026-04-14 | L2 |
 
-## Committee Reports (Betänkanden — Recently Passed or Pending)
+### Committee Reports (Betänkanden — Recently Passed or Pending)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Committee | Date | Status |
 |--------|-------|-----------|------|--------|
@@ -2093,7 +2059,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD01TU21 | En statlig e-legitimation | TU | 2026-04-14 | Pending vote |
 | HD01MJU19 | Reformering av avfallslagstiftning | MJU | 2026-04-16 | Pending vote |
 
-## Key Opposition Motions (Against Government Proposals)
+### Key Opposition Motions (Against Government Proposals)
 
 | dok_id | Party | Against | Date |
 |--------|-------|---------|------|
@@ -2108,7 +2074,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD024087 | MP | HD03229 reception law | 2026-04-15 |
 | HD024080 | S | HD03229 reception law | 2026-04-15 |
 
-## Active Interpellations (Selected — Past 14 Days)
+### Active Interpellations (Selected — Past 14 Days)
 
 | dok_id | Topic | Party | To Minister | Date |
 |--------|-------|-------|-------------|------|
@@ -2122,14 +2088,14 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD10433 | Bred skatteöversyn | S | Finance/Svantesson | 2026-04-15 |
 | HD10432 | Statligt säkerställande — investeringar i vårdbyggnader | S | Health/Lann | 2026-04-15 |
 
-## Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)
+### Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)
 
 | Indicator | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
 |-----------|------|------|------|------|
 | GDP Growth (%) | 0.82 | -0.20 | 1.26 | 5.23 |
 | Inflation CPI (%) | 2.84 | 8.55 | 8.37 | 2.16 |
 
-## Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C)
+### Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C)
 
 | Folder | Status | Notes |
 |--------|--------|-------|
@@ -2137,10 +2103,49 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | analysis/daily/2026-04-21/propositions/ | Prior cycle | Not yet available |
 | analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/ | Prior cycle | Not yet available |
 
-## Data Quality Assessment
+### Data Quality Assessment
 
 - **Completeness**: 20 primary documents retrieved, covering all major policy domains
 - **Depth distribution**: L3 (2), L2+ (9), L2 (9)
 - **Calendar API**: HTML error (known issue) — calendar data inferred from document submission dates and standard Riksdag spring session norms
 - **Full-text**: Available for all listed propositions via riksdagen.se
 - **Session context**: Riksmöte 2025/26 spring session ends June 2026; ~38 days of parliamentary activity covered
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03217-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03218-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03220-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03235-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03238-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03239-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03240-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03246-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD0399-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/article.md
index 771175b5d5..928c251eb2 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-23
 subfolder: monthly-review
 slug: 2026-04-23-monthly-review
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.919Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.716Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,37 +26,36 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md -->
 
 **Classification**: PUBLIC | **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Confidence**: HIGH [A1] | **Days to Election**: ~143
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Sweden's April 2026 parliamentary sprint delivered the Kristersson government's final pre-election legislative package. The month's political signature is a **fiscal-electoral pivot**: HD01FiU48 (4.1 billion SEK fuel tax emergency relief) passed April 22 with an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD supermajority, revealing S's inability to oppose household energy relief 143 days before the September 2026 election. Combined with NATO deployments (UFöU3), energy governance restructuring (HD03240/238/239), and a criminal justice sweep, the government has executed a high-confidence electoral positioning strategy — though healthcare (77 combined reservations across SfU18/SoU16/SoU17) and coalition stress (SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15) present credible vulnerabilities.
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
-### Decision 1: Electoral Strategy Assessment (September 2026)
+#### Decision 1: Electoral Strategy Assessment (September 2026)
 The government's pre-election positioning is coherent and professionally executed — fiscal responsibility + household relief + security + immigration delivery. The main risk is the healthcare battleground, where 77 combined committee reservations signal a well-organized opposition offensive.
 **Analyst Recommendation**: Monitor SfU committee deliberations and healthcare regional data for S campaign ammunition. Watch SD-KD healthcare split for escalation signals.
 
-### Decision 2: Energy Policy and Investment Timing
+#### Decision 2: Energy Policy and Investment Timing
 The energy triptych (HD03240/238/239) creates new investment opportunities and regulatory clarity for electricity infrastructure. Miljöprövningsmyndigheten will accelerate permitting. Wind power municipal revenue sharing (HD03239) resolves a key local opposition barrier.
 **Analyst Recommendation**: Investors in Swedish electricity production and renewable energy should note the regulatory framework stabilization as a positive signal.
 
-### Decision 3: Defence and Security Business Impact
+#### Decision 3: Defence and Security Business Impact
 UFöU3 (1,200 troops eFP Finland) + HD03214 (cybersecurity) + HD03228 (war materiel) signal continued high defence spending. Sweden's defence industrial base is being modernized through cleaner war materiel regulations.
 **Analyst Recommendation**: Defence and cybersecurity sector companies should note accelerated procurement and regulatory modernization signals.
 
 ---
 
-## 60-Second Read: Key Bullets
+### 60-Second Read: Key Bullets
 
 - 🔴 **April 22**: HD01FiU48 (4.1 GSEK fuel tax relief) enacted — M+SD+**S**+KD supermajority signals S's electoral vulnerability on energy costs
 - 🔴 **April 13**: Vårproposition (HD03100) + Vårändringsbudget (HD0399) — final pre-election fiscal framework
@@ -69,14 +68,14 @@ UFöU3 (1,200 troops eFP Finland) + HD03214 (cybersecurity) + HD03228 (war mater
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ Top Forward Trigger
+### ⚡ Top Forward Trigger
 
 **Monitor**: FiU48's post-adoption public opinion tracking — if household energy cost relief translates to M/KD/L polling gains, S's dual-track "symbolic opposition + practical support" strategy has failed. If S maintains or gains polling share despite April 22 vote, their message discipline is effective.
 **Trigger date**: First post-April 22 opinion polls (expected late April/early May 2026).
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Confidence Distribution
+### 📊 Confidence Distribution
 
 | Domain | Confidence | Admiralty |
 |--------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -97,7 +96,7 @@ pie title Confidence Distribution — Monthly Review
 
 ---
 
-## 🔗 Full Analysis References
+### 🔗 Full Analysis References
 
 - [Synthesis Summary](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md)
 - [Significance Scoring](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md)
@@ -108,8 +107,7 @@ pie title Confidence Distribution — Monthly Review
 - [Forward Indicators](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md)
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Analysis Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling
@@ -122,7 +120,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 Lead Story Decision
+### 🎯 Lead Story Decision
 
 **PRIMARY: The Spring 2026 Electoral Pivot — Government's Pre-Election Legislative Blitz and Fiscal Gamble**
 
@@ -138,7 +136,7 @@ UFöU3 authorizing 1,200 troops for NATO enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) in Finl
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard
+### 📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0', 'primaryBorderColor': '#00d9ff', 'lineColor': '#ff006e', 'secondaryColor': '#0a0e27', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -172,31 +170,31 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## Integrated Intelligence Picture
+### Integrated Intelligence Picture
 
-### Theme 1: The Electoral Fiscal Gamble [HIGH confidence — A1]
+#### Theme 1: The Electoral Fiscal Gamble [HIGH confidence — A1]
 
 The government's spring budget package is its last major fiscal statement before voters. Three interconnected propositions — the Vårproposition (HD03100/Prop. 2025/26:100), Vårändringsbudget (HD0399/Prop. 2025/26:99), and the Extra Ändringsbudget cutting fuel taxes (HD03236/Prop. 2025/26:236) — represent a carefully calibrated pre-election offer. The April 22 adoption of HD01FiU48 by an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD majority demonstrates that S was unwilling to be seen as blocking household energy relief, even at the cost of strategic consistency on climate. Finance Minister Svantesson (M) has positioned the Tidö government as fiscally responsible defenders of household purchasing power.
 
-### Theme 2: Energy Transition — Triptych Reform [HIGH confidence — A1]
+#### Theme 2: Energy Transition — Triptych Reform [HIGH confidence — A1]
 
 Three propositions tabled April 14 — HD03240 (new electricity system laws), HD03238 (new environmental permitting authority Miljöprövningsmyndigheten), and HD03239 (wind power municipal revenue reform) — represent the most comprehensive restructuring of Sweden's energy governance framework in a decade. The creation of Miljöprövningsmyndigheten is particularly significant: it explicitly accelerates permitting for electricity production infrastructure.
 
-### Theme 3: Security and Defence Legislative Framework [HIGH confidence — A1]
+#### Theme 3: Security and Defence Legislative Framework [HIGH confidence — A1]
 
 Sweden's NATO membership has generated a substantial legislative agenda. UFöU3 (1,200 troops eFP Finland), HD03214 (cybersecurity center), and HD03228 (war materiel modernization) represent the core legislative architecture of post-NATO Sweden. The cross-party consensus on defence is structurally important — it isolates SD's occasional dissent on social policy and positions security as a government strength heading into the election.
 
-### Theme 4: Healthcare and Social Insurance Battleground [HIGH confidence — A1]
+#### Theme 4: Healthcare and Social Insurance Battleground [HIGH confidence — A1]
 
 With 77 total reservations across SfU18 + SoU16 + SoU17, healthcare and social insurance are the opposition's primary vulnerability-targeting domain. The SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15 is the most analytically significant coalition signal of the month — representing a substantive policy disagreement between the government's two most conservative support pillars. This will be amplified during the election campaign.
 
-### Theme 5: Immigration Enforcement Acceleration [HIGH confidence — A1]
+#### Theme 5: Immigration Enforcement Acceleration [HIGH confidence — A1]
 
 Three immigration measures (HD03235 criminal deportation, new reception act, settlement act) represent the Tidö coalition's most ideologically SD-driven deliverables. HD03235 carries the highest ECHR risk (L×I score 15/25) but is also the most electorally potent for SD.
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context
 
 | Evidence item | Source | Admiralty | WEP expression |
 |--------------|--------|-----------|----------------|
@@ -215,7 +213,7 @@ Three immigration measures (HD03235 criminal deportation, new reception act, set
 
 ---
 
-## AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 - **Recommended Title (EN)**: "Sweden's April 2026 Parliamentary Sprint: How the Kristersson Government Positioned Itself for September's Election"
 - **Recommended Title (SV)**: "Sveriges riksdag april 2026: Hur Kristerssonregeringen positionerade sig inför septembervalet"
@@ -223,8 +221,7 @@ Three immigration measures (HD03235 criminal deportation, new reception act, set
 - **Meta Description (SV)**: "Månadsöversikt: 30 dagars riksdagspolitik — bränsleskattelättnader, NATO-insatser, energireform och sjukvårdsstriden inför valet 2026."
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: ICD 203 Key Judgments + Admiralty Code + WEP Kent Scale
@@ -233,30 +230,30 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### KJ-1: HD01FiU48 Enactment Strengthens Government's Pre-Election Positioning [HIGH — A1]
+#### KJ-1: HD01FiU48 Enactment Strengthens Government's Pre-Election Positioning [HIGH — A1]
 
 The Kristersson government enacted HD01FiU48 on April 22 with M+SD+S+KD majority support, delivering 82 öre/litre fuel tax relief effective May 2026. This represents the government's most significant pre-election economic win. S's tactical affirmative vote further validates the measure's cross-spectrum appeal and may blunt opposition criticism on household living costs.
 
 **Confidence basis**: [A1] — multiple primary sources confirming enactment; World Bank economic data supports stable macro baseline; cross-party vote is verifiable parliamentary record.
 **WEP expression**: **Highly likely** the fuel relief will be a positive electoral factor for the governing coalition.
 
-### KJ-2: 77 Committee Reservations Represent the Opposition's Primary Electoral Weapon [HIGH — A2]
+#### KJ-2: 77 Committee Reservations Represent the Opposition's Primary Electoral Weapon [HIGH — A2]
 
 The aggregated 77 committee reservations across SfU18 (39), SoU16 (20), and SoU17 (18) constitute the largest coordinated opposition documentation campaign in the 2024/25 riksmöte. Combined with S's Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) and SD's challenges to M (HD10429), the opposition's welfare-state narrative is fully operationalised.
 
 **Confidence basis**: [A2] — official parliamentary documents; committee reservation counts are verifiable from riksdagen.se.
 **WEP expression**: **Likely** the welfare narrative will remain the opposition's primary attack vector through September 2026.
 
-### KJ-3: SD-M Demonstrations Fracture Does Not Yet Threaten Coalition Survival [MEDIUM — B2]
+#### KJ-3: SD-M Demonstrations Fracture Does Not Yet Threaten Coalition Survival [MEDIUM — B2]
 
 SD's formal interpellation HD10429 against Justice Minister Strömmer on demonstration rights represents an unprecedented intra-coalition challenge, but does not constitute a vote against the government. SD retains every incentive to maintain coalition support through the September 2026 election. The fracture remains symbolic and tactical.
 
 **Confidence basis**: [B2] — HD10429 confirms the interpellation exists; absence of SD motion or vote signal is inferential.
 **WEP expression**: **Unlikely** the SD-M fracture will lead to a government collapse before September 2026.
 
-### KJ-4: UFöU3 NATO Finland Deployment Establishes Sweden as Credible Alliance Member [HIGH — A1]
+#### KJ-4: UFöU3 NATO Finland Deployment Establishes Sweden as Credible Alliance Member [HIGH — A1]
 
 The Foreign Affairs Committee's UFöU3 authorising deployment of 1,200 Swedish troops to NATO's eFP in Finland pending June 4 Chamber vote has broad cross-party support. This represents Sweden's most significant NATO post-accession commitment and cements Sweden's security contribution.
 
@@ -265,9 +262,9 @@ The Foreign Affairs Committee's UFöU3 authorising deployment of 1,200 Swedish t
 
 ---
 
-## Prior-Cycle PIR Resolution (Tier-C Continuity Contract)
+### Prior-Cycle PIR Resolution (Tier-C Continuity Contract)
 
-### Carried-forward PIRs from analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/
+#### Carried-forward PIRs from analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/
 
 | Prior-cycle PIR | Status | Evidence | Residual PIR? |
 |-----------------|--------|---------|---------------|
@@ -278,7 +275,7 @@ The Foreign Affairs Committee's UFöU3 authorising deployment of 1,200 Swedish t
 
 ---
 
-## Issued PIRs — Carrying Forward to May 2026
+### Issued PIRs — Carrying Forward to May 2026
 
 | PIR | Question | Priority | Horizon |
 |-----|---------|---------|--------|
@@ -290,7 +287,7 @@ The Foreign Affairs Committee's UFöU3 authorising deployment of 1,200 Swedish t
 
 ---
 
-## 🔄 Tradecraft Context
+### 🔄 Tradecraft Context
 
 | Analytic product | SAT used | ICD 203 standard | Improvement flag |
 |-----------------|----------|------------------|-----------------|
@@ -304,7 +301,7 @@ The Foreign Affairs Committee's UFöU3 authorising deployment of 1,200 Swedish t
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Distribution Summary
+### Confidence Distribution Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -317,8 +314,7 @@ pie title Admiralty Confidence Distribution — April 2026 Assessment
 ```
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Methodology**: DIW weighting (Depth × Impact × Width) — ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0
@@ -326,9 +322,9 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## DIW-Weighted Rankings
+### DIW-Weighted Rankings
 
-### Tier 1 — Critical Significance (DIW 9.0–10.0)
+#### Tier 1 — Critical Significance (DIW 9.0–10.0)
 
 1. **HD01FiU48 / HD03236** — Extra Ändringsbudget: Fuel tax relief 4.1 GSEK [A1]
    - Depth: 9 (direct economic impact on every Swedish household)
@@ -342,7 +338,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
    - Width: 9 (government's definitive economic narrative)
    - **DIW Score: 9.2/10** | Source: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html
 
-### Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW 7.5–8.9)
+#### Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW 7.5–8.9)
 
 3. **UFöU3** — NATO eFP Finland: 1,200 troops authorized [A1]
    - Depth: 8 (major military commitment)
@@ -362,7 +358,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
    - Width: 7 (energy sector + climate impact)
    - **DIW Score: 8.0/10** | Source: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240.html
 
-### Tier 3 — Medium Significance (DIW 6.0–7.4)
+#### Tier 3 — Medium Significance (DIW 6.0–7.4)
 
 6. **HD03235** — Criminal deportation rules [A1]
    - Depth: 7 | Impact: 8 | Width: 6 | **DIW: 7.5/10**
@@ -401,7 +397,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Sensitivity Analysis
+### Sensitivity Analysis
 
 | Scenario | Effect on Rankings | Confidence |
 |----------|-------------------|-----------|
@@ -412,7 +408,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Ranking Mermaid Diagram
+### Ranking Mermaid Diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -424,8 +420,7 @@ xychart-beta
 ```
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Per-party framing analysis + narrative control assessment
@@ -433,9 +428,9 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Governing Bloc Framing
+### Governing Bloc Framing
 
-### M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Competence Frame
+#### M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Competence Frame
 **Core narrative**: "We manage Sweden's economy responsibly — HD03100 spring bill + HD01FiU48 household relief proves fiscal leadership."
 **Key messages**:
 1. "Household energy costs relieved — 82 öre/litre from May 1" (HD01FiU48)
@@ -444,19 +439,19 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 **Framing risk**: S's interpellation series (HD10442) targets Finance Minister Svantesson directly — court ruling potentially contradicting Svantesson's statements. M must counter with factual rebuttal.
 
-### SD (Sverigedemokraterna) — Order and Identity Frame
+#### SD (Sverigedemokraterna) — Order and Identity Frame
 **Core narrative**: "SD delivers on immigration and enforcement — HD03235 is SD's biggest win in 2025/26."
 **Contradictory signal**: HD10429 interpellation against M's Strömmer on demonstrations — SD must reconcile "order" frame with civil-liberties dispute.
 
-### KD — Social-Christian Values Frame
+#### KD — Social-Christian Values Frame
 **Core narrative**: "Family, healthcare, Christian values — SoU17 R15 signals we will not accept healthcare cuts."
 **Framing vulnerability**: KD's SoU17 R15 reservation publicly distances KD from SD on healthcare — useful for KD differentiation but signals coalition fragility to voters.
 
 ---
 
-## Opposition Framing
+### Opposition Framing
 
-### S — Responsible Opposition Frame
+#### S — Responsible Opposition Frame
 **Core narrative**: "We vote yes when it helps Swedes (FiU48), no when it hurts (SfU18/SoU16/SoU17). We are the responsible alternative."
 **Strategic advantage**: Cross-party FiU48 vote appears "statesmanlike." Simultaneous interpellation offensive (HD10442) maintains critical distance.
 **Key messages**:
@@ -464,21 +459,21 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 2. "Finance Minister Svantesson misled the Riksdag" (HD10442 claim)
 3. "We supported fuel relief because Swedes needed it — not the government"
 
-### V — Progressive Flank Frame
+#### V — Progressive Flank Frame
 **Core narrative**: "S is too centrist — V is the party of real welfare state defence."
 **Risk**: If S moves to centre, V may lose voters who prefer a clear left alternative.
 
-### MP — Climate First Frame
+#### MP — Climate First Frame
 **Core narrative**: "HD024082 fuel counter-motion shows only MP puts climate first."
 **Risk**: FiU48 + S's yes vote signals climate concerns secondary to household costs — MP narrative is weakened.
 
-### C — Market Liberal Pragmatist Frame
+#### C — Market Liberal Pragmatist Frame
 **Core narrative**: "We support energy reform (HD03240 abstained on FiU48) and housing (HC023443) — we are the sensible centre."
 **Strategic opportunity**: C abstained on FiU48 — preserves both coalition and opposition options. C is the true pivot party.
 
 ---
 
-## Narrative Control Assessment
+### Narrative Control Assessment
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -492,8 +487,7 @@ xychart-beta
 **Top finding**: S has the strongest current narrative (8/10) — responsible opposition + accountability offensive. M and SD tied at 7/10. MP weakest at 4/10 following FiU48 cross-party energy passage.
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: 6-lens stakeholder matrix + influence network
@@ -501,7 +495,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
+### 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
 
 | Stakeholder | Position | Interest | Influence | Stance | Named actors | Source |
 |-------------|----------|---------|-----------|--------|--------------|--------|
@@ -518,7 +512,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Influence Network
+### Influence Network
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -568,7 +562,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Winner/Loser Analysis — April 2026
+### Winner/Loser Analysis — April 2026
 
 | Actor | Win/Loss | Evidence |
 |-------|----------|---------|
@@ -581,8 +575,7 @@ graph TD
 | Ukraine accountability | **WIN** — HD03231 + HD03232 establish Sweden as serious rule-of-law actor | riksdagen.se [A2] |
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: ≥10 dated forward indicators across 4 horizons
@@ -590,7 +583,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 1: Immediate (April 24 – May 31, 2026)
+### Horizon 1: Immediate (April 24 – May 31, 2026)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected date | Watch signal | Risk |
 |---|-----------|--------------|--------------|------|
@@ -599,7 +592,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | FI-03 | Strömmer responds to HD10429 SD interpellation | April–May 2026 | Tone: conciliatory vs. dismissive affects SD cooperation | MEDIUM |
 | FI-04 | HD03235 criminal deportation first enforcement case | May 2026 | ECHR interim measure filing triggered? | HIGH |
 
-## Horizon 2: Short-term (June – August 2026)
+### Horizon 2: Short-term (June – August 2026)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected date | Watch signal | Risk |
 |---|-----------|--------------|--------------|------|
@@ -610,14 +603,14 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | FI-09 | Party leader polls — SD vs. M dynamic | June 2026 | If SD > 25%: SD demands greater coalition role | HIGH |
 | FI-10 | Energy committee final report on HD03240 | August 2026 | Legislative timeline for autumn confirms energy reform pace | MEDIUM |
 
-## Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2026)
+### Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2026)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected date | Watch signal | Risk |
 |---|-----------|--------------|--------------|------|
 | FI-11 | Valmyndigheten advance voting opens | August 26, 2026 | Turnout patterns indicate which bloc is mobilised | MEDIUM |
 | FI-12 | September 13 election result | September 13, 2026 | S+V+MP+C ≥ 175: government change; Governing bloc ≥ 175: re-election | CRITICAL |
 
-## Horizon 4: Post-Election (October 2026+)
+### Horizon 4: Post-Election (October 2026+)
 
 | # | Indicator | Expected date | Watch signal | Risk |
 |---|-----------|--------------|--------------|------|
@@ -626,7 +619,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Indicators Summary
+### Indicators Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -656,8 +649,7 @@ gantt
 **Total indicators**: 14 across 4 horizons. Threshold requirement met (≥10). [A1]
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: F3EAD Exploit→Analyze; Kent Scale probability bands
@@ -665,7 +657,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Probability Summary
+### Scenario Probability Summary
 
 | Scenario | Name | Probability | Kent | Timeframe |
 |----------|------|-------------|------|-----------|
@@ -678,45 +670,45 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## S-1: Government Survives — Fiscal Wins Dominate (40%)
+### S-1: Government Survives — Fiscal Wins Dominate (40%)
 
-### Narrative
+#### Narrative
 
 The Kristersson government capitalizes on HD01FiU48 household fuel relief, HD03100 spring economic bill, and NATO-deployment achievement (UFöU3). Unemployment declining, inflation contained at 2.84% — economic management narrative holds. SD and KD demonstrations-healthcare fractures remain verbal, not structural. Election: M+SD+KD+L return with slim majority (≥175 seats).
 
-### Evidence supporting this scenario
+#### Evidence supporting this scenario
 
 - HD01FiU48 enacted April 22 — cross-party support (M+SD+S+KD) signals economic competence [A1]
 - World Bank: GDP growth 0.82%, unemployment 8.69% — stable base
 - NATO Finland deployment (UFöU3) plays to security-focused voters
 - S's tactical FiU48 vote reduces opposition's ability to attack government on energy
 
-### Conditions required
+#### Conditions required
 
 1. SD-M demonstrations fracture does not escalate beyond interpellation
 2. ECHR does not issue interim measure on HD03235 before election
 3. No major scandal emerges before September 13
 
-### Wild card
+#### Wild card
 
 KD-SD healthcare fracture (SoU17 R15) escalates — KD signals it will not pass next healthcare funding bill without additional appropriation.
 
 ---
 
-## S-2: Narrow S-Led Government After Election (30%)
+### S-2: Narrow S-Led Government After Election (30%)
 
-### Narrative
+#### Narrative
 
 S successfully exploits welfare-state narrative built on 77 committee reservations (SfU18+SoU16+SoU17). S+V+MP+C form narrow majority (≥175 seats). FiU48 energy relief proves insufficient — voters prioritise healthcare. New government rolls back HD03235, re-opens NATO deployment for debate.
 
-### Evidence supporting this scenario
+#### Evidence supporting this scenario
 
 - 77 cumulative opposition reservations represent largest coordinated campaign in 2025/26 [A2]
 - S's Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) shows strategic focus
 - SoU17 R15: KD fracture provides S with cross-coalition evidence of government failure
 - Historical: S recovered from 2022 defeat faster than expected
 
-### Conditions required
+#### Conditions required
 
 1. Healthcare spending remains top voter concern through September
 2. S successfully converts Svantesson accountability offensive into voter movement
@@ -724,19 +716,19 @@ S successfully exploits welfare-state narrative built on 77 committee reservatio
 
 ---
 
-## S-3: SD Major Gains — M Pushed Further Right (20%)
+### S-3: SD Major Gains — M Pushed Further Right (20%)
 
-### Narrative
+#### Narrative
 
 SD achieves 25%+ in polls. SD demands larger role in government, potentially PM candidacy or formal coalition membership. M forced to concede more on immigration/criminal justice. ECHR challenge to HD03235 dismissed — SD vindicated.
 
-### Evidence supporting this scenario
+#### Evidence supporting this scenario
 
 - HD10429 (SD challenges M) signals SD's growing assertiveness [B2]
 - HD03235 (criminal deportation) is SD's core voter-mobilization policy
 - If ECHR upholds HD03235: SD gains major credibility boost
 
-### Conditions required
+#### Conditions required
 
 1. ECHR does not issue adverse ruling on HD03235 before election
 2. Major immigration/crime incident amplified in media
@@ -744,19 +736,19 @@ SD achieves 25%+ in polls. SD demands larger role in government, potentially PM
 
 ---
 
-## S-4: Coalition Collapse Before Election (10%)
+### S-4: Coalition Collapse Before Election (10%)
 
-### Narrative
+#### Narrative
 
 SD withholds support on a critical budget vote in June/July. Emergency SD-S-V situation. Early election or minority government operating under SD's demands escalate beyond acceptable levels for M/KD/L.
 
-### Evidence supporting this scenario
+#### Evidence supporting this scenario
 
 - HD10429: SD publicly challenges M on demonstrations — crossing formal interpellation line [B2]
 - SoU17 R15: KD healthcare fracture creates second pressure point
 - If both fractures converge on same autumn bill, loss of majority in chamber possible
 
-### Conditions required
+#### Conditions required
 
 1. SD and KD jointly oppose a government bill in same vote
 2. S refuses to provide replacement support
@@ -764,7 +756,7 @@ SD withholds support on a critical budget vote in June/July. Emergency SD-S-V si
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Timeline
+### Scenario Timeline
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -784,8 +776,7 @@ gantt
 ```
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: 5-dimension register, L×I scoring, cascading chains
@@ -793,7 +784,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## 5-Dimension Risk Register
+### 5-Dimension Risk Register
 
 | # | Risk | Likelihood (1–5) | Impact (1–5) | L×I | Category | Admiralty |
 |---|------|-----------------|--------------|-----|----------|-----------|
@@ -810,9 +801,9 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Cascading Risk Chains
+### Cascading Risk Chains
 
-### Chain A: Healthcare → Coalition Collapse
+#### Chain A: Healthcare → Coalition Collapse
 ```
 SoU17 R15 SD-KD fracture [R1 → L3/I5]
 → Healthcare debate escalation in campaign
@@ -822,7 +813,7 @@ SoU17 R15 SD-KD fracture [R1 → L3/I5]
 ```
 **Probability**: 15% (Unlikely, WEP standard). Source: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html
 
-### Chain B: Accountability → Finance Minister Resignation
+#### Chain B: Accountability → Finance Minister Resignation
 ```
 Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) [R3]
 → Potential false-statement allegation
@@ -832,7 +823,7 @@ Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) [R3]
 ```
 **Probability**: 10% (Very unlikely, WEP). Source: https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html
 
-### Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narrative
+#### Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narrative
 ```
 77 reservations [R8 → L4/I4]
 → S + V + MP coordinated healthcare campaign
@@ -844,7 +835,7 @@ Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) [R3]
 
 ---
 
-## Posterior Probability Assessment (Bayesian update)
+### Posterior Probability Assessment (Bayesian update)
 
 | Risk | Prior P | Update trigger | Posterior P |
 |------|---------|---------------|-------------|
@@ -855,7 +846,7 @@ Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) [R3]
 
 ---
 
-## Risk Heatmap
+### Risk Heatmap
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -867,17 +858,16 @@ xychart-beta
 ```
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: SWOT + TOWS matrix | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
 ---
 
-## SWOT Framework
+### SWOT Framework
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 - **Comprehensive pre-election delivery**: Government tabled its final legislative package including spring budget (HD03100, https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html), fuel relief (HD01FiU48, https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html), and energy reform (HD03240) [A1]
 - **Cross-party defence consensus**: UFöU3 (NATO Finland, 1,200 troops) passed with cross-party support — security is a government strength [A1]
@@ -885,7 +875,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 - **Fiscal credibility**: Surplus rule maintained in Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100); Svantesson framing "responsible but caring" fiscal management [A2]
 - **Energy governance modernization**: Miljöprövningsmyndigheten (HD03238) addresses Sweden's notoriously slow permitting — business community broadly supportive [A2]
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 - **Healthcare vulnerability**: SfU18 (39 reservations), SoU16 (20 reservations), SoU17 (18 reservations) = 77 total reservations across 3 committees — deepest opposition battleground of the session [A1, https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html]
 - **SD-KD coalition stress**: Joint SD-KD reservation on SoU17 R15 reveals healthcare prioritization disagreement within governing support base [A1, https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html]
@@ -893,7 +883,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 - **Fiscal deterioration signal**: 4.1 GSEK HD01FiU48 emergency spending increases deficit — critics note structural inconsistency with surplus rule narrative [A2]
 - **Unemployment elevated**: 8.69% unemployment (2025 World Bank data) — highest in a decade among Nordic peers; S's main economic attack vector [A1]
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 - **Electoral energy narrative**: If fuel price relief reduces household energy bills visibly before September 2026, it directly validates the government's pre-election promise [B2]
 - **Wind power local buy-in**: HD03239 (municipal revenue from wind power) resolves the key local acceptance barrier for renewable buildout — potential for M+C+L joint electoral appeal on climate-economy integration [A2]
@@ -901,7 +891,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 - **Paid police education (HD03237)**: Broadens police recruitment pipeline — visible anti-crime commitment ahead of election [B2]
 - **Digital infrastructure**: TU21 (state e-ID) + TU17 (anti-fraud telecoms) create observable digital governance improvements valued by younger voters [B2]
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 - **Healthcare campaign**: S, V, and MP have built a coherent welfare-state narrative across 77 combined reservations — organized opposition attack on government's most vulnerable flank [A1]
 - **Energy price reversal**: If Middle East tensions ease and energy prices fall before election, HD01FiU48's electoral value diminishes and fiscal deterioration looks opportunistic [B3]
@@ -911,7 +901,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## TOWS Matrix
+### TOWS Matrix
 
 | | Strengths | Weaknesses |
 |---|-----------|-----------|
@@ -920,7 +910,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-SWOT Pattern
+### Cross-SWOT Pattern
 
 The month's dominant pattern is **electoral positioning under fiscal constraint**: the government uses targeted household relief (energy costs) to compensate for structural weaknesses (healthcare, unemployment) while banking on security/NATO as a non-contested strength. The SD-KD healthcare fracture is the single most dangerous SWOT element — if it widens, it could force a headline coalition crisis during the campaign.
 
@@ -945,8 +935,7 @@ quadrantChart
 ```
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Political Threat Taxonomy + Attack Tree + MITRE-style TTP mapping
@@ -954,9 +943,9 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy
+### Political Threat Taxonomy
 
-### Threat T1: Electoral Welfare Narrative Attack [HIGH — A1]
+#### Threat T1: Electoral Welfare Narrative Attack [HIGH — A1]
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -967,7 +956,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | **Timing** | Now through September 13, 2026 election |
 | **MITRE-style TTP** | T-POL-001: Coordinated legislative opposition documentation → T-POL-002: Public opinion amplification → T-POL-003: Ministerial accountability targeting |
 
-### Threat T2: Intra-Coalition Defection — SD Challenges M [MEDIUM — B2]
+#### Threat T2: Intra-Coalition Defection — SD Challenges M [MEDIUM — B2]
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -978,7 +967,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | **Timing** | Immediate; interpellation pending response |
 | **MITRE-style TTP** | T-COA-001: Support-party formal dissent → T-COA-002: Public signals to SD voter base → T-COA-003: Coalition renegotiation pressure |
 
-### Threat T3: Legal/ECHR Challenge to Criminal Deportation [MEDIUM — B3]
+#### Threat T3: Legal/ECHR Challenge to Criminal Deportation [MEDIUM — B3]
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -989,7 +978,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | **Timing** | 6–18 months from enactment |
 | **MITRE-style TTP** | T-LEG-001: Challenge filing → T-LEG-002: Interim measures request → T-LEG-003: High-profile case selection |
 
-### Threat T4: S Accountability Offensive — Svantesson [HIGH — A2]
+#### Threat T4: S Accountability Offensive — Svantesson [HIGH — A2]
 
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
@@ -1002,7 +991,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Attack Tree
+### Attack Tree
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -1045,7 +1034,7 @@ graph TD
 
 ---
 
-## Threat Vector Phase Analysis — Threat T1 (Welfare Narrative)
+### Threat Vector Phase Analysis — Threat T1 (Welfare Narrative)
 
 | Phase | Activity | Observable indicator |
 |-------|----------|---------------------|
@@ -1061,24 +1050,23 @@ graph TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01FiU48
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01FiU48 | **Type**: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 **Committee**: Finansutskottet | **Date**: April 22, 2026 (enacted)
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD01FiU48 is the Finance Committee's report authorising a temporary reduction in fuel excise tax of approximately 82 öre per litre effective May 1 through September 30, 2026. The measure provides direct household relief on transport energy costs.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW Score**: 10/10 (Tier 1 Critical)
 
 This is the most politically significant enactment of April 2026. Passed with M+SD+S+KD majority — the opposition S party's tactical affirmative vote validates cross-spectrum appeal and creates an unusual cross-coalition consensus on a flagship economic measure.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 
 | Element | Value |
 |---------|-------|
@@ -1086,40 +1074,39 @@ This is the most politically significant enactment of April 2026. Passed with M+
 | Information quality | 1 — Confirmed by multiple sources |
 | Confidence | **A1** |
 
-## Key Stakeholders
+### Key Stakeholders
 
 - **Proponents**: M (fiscal relief), SD (voter cost-of-living), KD (family budgets), S (tactical)
 - **Opponents**: V and MP (environmental: petrol demand increase); L (abstained)
 - **Beneficiaries**: Swedish households — particularly rural and suburban car-dependent
 
-## Policy Domain
+### Policy Domain
 
 Fiscal / Energy / Household economics
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html
 - HD01FiU48 Riksdagen committee report
 
 ### HD01SfU18
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD01SfU18 | **Type**: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 **Committee**: Socialförsäkringsutskottet | **Date**: 2026
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD01SfU18 is the Social Insurance Committee's report on social insurance reform. It contains 39 opposition reservations — the largest single-document reservation count in the 2025/26 riksmöte.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW Score**: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)
 
 39 reservations represent the primary documented evidence for the opposition's welfare-state attack narrative. Combined with SoU16 (20) and SoU17 (18), total 77 reservations.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 
 | Element | Value |
 |---------|-------|
@@ -1127,29 +1114,28 @@ HD01SfU18 is the Social Insurance Committee's report on social insurance reform.
 | Information quality | 1 — Confirmed |
 | Confidence | **A1** |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html
 
 ### HD03100
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03100-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03100 | **Type**: Proposition (Government Bill)
 **Ministry**: Finansdepartementet | **Date**: April 2026
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD03100 is the government's spring economic proposition — Vårproposition 2026. It contains the fiscal framework for 2026/27, including tax and expenditure adjustments.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW Score**: 9/10 (Tier 1 Critical)
 
 The spring economic bill is the government's central pre-election economic message. It establishes the fiscal space narrative for the September 2026 election.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 
 | Element | Value |
 |---------|-------|
@@ -1157,33 +1143,32 @@ The spring economic bill is the government's central pre-election economic messa
 | Information quality | 1 — Confirmed |
 | Confidence | **A1** |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html
 
 ### HD03235
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03235-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03235-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03235 | **Type**: Proposition (Government Bill)
 **Ministry**: Justitiedepartementet | **Date**: 2026
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD03235 extends criminal deportation rules — individuals convicted of serious crimes can face deportation even if granted Swedish residency/citizenship. This is a Tidöavtalet flagship delivery.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW Score**: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)
 
 SD's central immigration enforcement demand. High ECHR proportionality challenge risk (L×I: 15/25). Passed with M+SD majority.
 
-## Key Risk
+### Key Risk
 
 ECHR challenge timing is critical. An adverse ECHR ruling before September 13, 2026 would significantly harm SD and M's law-and-order narrative.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 
 | Element | Value |
 |---------|-------|
@@ -1191,30 +1176,29 @@ ECHR challenge timing is critical. An adverse ECHR ruling before September 13, 2
 | Information quality | 1 — Confirmed |
 | Confidence | **A1** |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html
 
 ### HD10429
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10429-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10429-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10429 | **Type**: Interpellation
 **From**: SD | **To**: Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)
 **Date**: April 2026
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD10429 is SD's interpellation challenging Justice Minister Strömmer on the Prop. 133 demonstration rights restriction. SD objects that the restrictions are too broad and may limit legitimate demonstrations.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW Score**: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)
 
 This is an unprecedented intra-coalition challenge — a support party formally interpellating a minister from the governing bloc. Signals SD's growing assertiveness and its potential to leverage formal parliamentary mechanisms.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 
 | Element | Value |
 |---------|-------|
@@ -1222,30 +1206,29 @@ This is an unprecedented intra-coalition challenge — a support party formally
 | Information quality | 1 — Confirmed |
 | Confidence | **A1** |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html
 
 ### HD10442
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10442-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10442-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD10442 | **Type**: Interpellation
 **From**: S | **To**: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 **Date**: April 2026
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 HD10442 is one of S's 5 interpellations filed against Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson in a 48-hour period in April 2026. This interpellation concerns ätstörningsvård (eating disorder care) funding, citing a court ruling that potentially contradicts Svantesson's public statements.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW Score**: 7/10 (Tier 2 High)
 
 The five-interpellation series represents a coordinated accountability offensive. The eating disorder care angle — which resonates with healthcare narrative — adds emotional weight to a financial accountability argument.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 
 | Element | Value |
 |---------|-------|
@@ -1253,29 +1236,28 @@ The five-interpellation series represents a coordinated accountability offensive
 | Information quality | 1 — Confirmed |
 | Confidence | **A1** |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html
 
 ### UFöU3
-
-_Source: [`documents/UFöU3-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UFöU3-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/UFöU3-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UFöU3-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: UFöU3 | **Type**: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 **Committee**: Utrikesutskottet/Försvarsutskottet | **Date**: April 2026 (pending Chamber vote June 4)
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH [A1]
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 UFöU3 authorises the deployment of 1,200 Swedish troops to NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) battalion in Finland. This is Sweden's largest single military commitment since NATO accession in March 2024.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW Score**: 9/10 (Tier 1 Critical)
 
 UFöU3 represents Sweden's most significant NATO post-accession commitment. The broad parliamentary consensus (cross-party support anticipated) signals Sweden's credibility as a NATO ally.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 
 | Element | Value |
 |---------|-------|
@@ -1283,14 +1265,13 @@ UFöU3 represents Sweden's most significant NATO post-accession commitment. The
 | Information quality | 1 — Confirmed |
 | Confidence | **A1** |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UFöU3.html
 - Riksdag committee report on defence deployment
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Electoral projection + coalition viability assessment
@@ -1299,7 +1280,7 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Current Seat Projection (April 2026)
+### Current Seat Projection (April 2026)
 
 | Party | Current seats (2022) | April 2026 projection | Change | Coalition |
 |-------|---------------------|----------------------|--------|---------|
@@ -1318,21 +1299,21 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Key Electoral Dynamics
+### Key Electoral Dynamics
 
-### 1. SD Polarisation Effect
+#### 1. SD Polarisation Effect
 
 SD at 73 seats is the second-largest party. If SD gains from HD03235 criminal deportation narrative, it could reach 78–80 seats — the most in Swedish electoral history. Counter-risk: ECHR adverse ruling diminishes SD's legal credibility on deportation.
 
 **Source**: Current seat distribution from riksdag-regering.se ledamöter statistics; WEP: **Roughly even** whether SD gains or holds.
 
-### 2. KD Fragility
+#### 2. KD Fragility
 
 KD's 19 seats in 2022 represents a historical minimum. SoU17 R15 healthcare fracture signals KD voters may migrate to M or S. If KD falls below 4% threshold: **governing bloc loses 19 seats** — potentially catastrophic.
 
 **KD threshold risk**: WEP: **Unlikely** but non-negligible (10%) if healthcare narrative dominates.
 
-### 3. S's Strategic Position
+#### 3. S's Strategic Position
 
 S at 107 seats needs C (24 seats) to form majority. C's position is ambiguous — market liberal, could support either bloc. S's FiU48 tactical vote signals S is willing to cooperate with right on energy — may attract C.
 
@@ -1340,7 +1321,7 @@ S at 107 seats needs C (24 seats) to form majority. C's position is ambiguous 
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Viability Matrix
+### Coalition Viability Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -1353,7 +1334,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 ---
 
-## Forward Electoral Indicators (April → September)
+### Forward Electoral Indicators (April → September)
 
 | Indicator | Target | Current status | Risk if missed |
 |-----------|--------|----------------|----------------|
@@ -1364,8 +1345,7 @@ xychart-beta
 | S-C coalition signal | Before August | Not yet signalled | Medium |
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Riksdag vote mathematics — 349 seats, 175-seat majority threshold
@@ -1373,7 +1353,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Seat Distribution — Current Riksdag (2022 election result)
+### Seat Distribution — Current Riksdag (2022 election result)
 
 | Party | Seats | Bloc | Notes |
 |-------|-------|------|-------|
@@ -1391,7 +1371,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — April 22, 2026
+### HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — April 22, 2026
 
 | Party | Ja | Nej | Avstår | Absent | Notes |
 |-------|-----|-----|--------|--------|-------|
@@ -1409,7 +1389,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Pivotal Vote Table — Key Upcoming Votes
+### Pivotal Vote Table — Key Upcoming Votes
 
 | Vote | Date | Threshold | Required support | Governing bloc sufficient? |
 |------|------|-----------|-----------------|---------------------------|
@@ -1419,7 +1399,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Fragility Map
+### Coalition Fragility Map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -1458,12 +1438,11 @@ graph TD
 ```
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Demographic Impact Analysis
+### Demographic Impact Analysis
 
 | Segment | Policy impact | Key document | Net effect | Electoral implication |
 |---------|--------------|--------------|-----------|----------------------|
@@ -1478,7 +1457,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Regional Analysis
+### Regional Analysis
 
 | Region | Key concerns | Governing bloc advantage | Opposition advantage |
 |--------|-------------|--------------------------|---------------------|
@@ -1490,7 +1469,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Mobilisation Index
+### Mobilisation Index
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -1504,8 +1483,7 @@ xychart-beta
 **Top insight**: Healthcare is the highest-mobilisation issue (9/10) and favours the opposition — this is the government's primary vulnerability heading into September 2026.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Nordic + EU comparator analysis
@@ -1513,9 +1491,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator 1: Finland — Coalition Stability Under Security Pressure
+### Comparator 1: Finland — Coalition Stability Under Security Pressure
 
-### Parallels to Sweden 2026
+#### Parallels to Sweden 2026
 
 Finland's Orpo government (2023-present) has maintained a right-wing coalition (KOK+PS+SFP+KD) under similar pressures: immigration restrictive policies, welfare-state opposition criticism, and enhanced NATO commitments. Key parallels:
 
@@ -1533,9 +1511,9 @@ Finland's Orpo government (2023-present) has maintained a right-wing coalition (
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator 2: Germany — Bundestag Post-2025 Coalition Math
+### Comparator 2: Germany — Bundestag Post-2025 Coalition Math
 
-### Parallels to Sweden 2026
+#### Parallels to Sweden 2026
 
 Germany's CDU/CSU-SPD grand coalition (2025-present) represents a model of pragmatic cross-aisle cooperation on energy and security. Relevant to Sweden's HD01FiU48 passage (S voted yes with government on energy relief):
 
@@ -1553,9 +1531,9 @@ Germany's CDU/CSU-SPD grand coalition (2025-present) represents a model of pragm
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator 3: Denmark — Mette Frederiksen's Welfare-Security Synthesis
+### Comparator 3: Denmark — Mette Frederiksen's Welfare-Security Synthesis
 
-### Parallels to Sweden 2026
+#### Parallels to Sweden 2026
 
 Denmark's SVM-government (S+V+M) under Frederiksen demonstrates that a social-democratic party can govern with right-wing support while maintaining welfare credibility:
 
@@ -1572,7 +1550,7 @@ Denmark's SVM-government (S+V+M) under Frederiksen demonstrates that a social-de
 
 ---
 
-## Summary Assessment
+### Summary Assessment
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
@@ -1593,8 +1571,7 @@ quadrantChart
 **Conclusion**: Sweden's coalition stability is on par with Finland's comparable right-wing government. The key vulnerability relative to Denmark is healthcare investment — the dimension where S can differentiate.
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Named precedents ≤40 years from analysis date
@@ -1602,14 +1579,14 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 1: Bildt Government Fiscal Consolidation (1991–94) — Direct Analogy
+### Parallel 1: Bildt Government Fiscal Consolidation (1991–94) — Direct Analogy
 
-### Summary
+#### Summary
 Carl Bildt's (M) bourgeois four-party coalition (M+KD+FP+C) governed 1991–94. The coalition managed a severe banking crisis while delivering fiscal consolidation. The coalition fractured on several issues but survived to 1994 — only losing to S after three years.
 
 **Period**: 1991–1994 — within 40 years from 2026.
 
-### Parallels to 2026
+#### Parallels to 2026
 
 | Dimension | Bildt 1991–94 | Kristersson 2022–26 |
 |-----------|--------------|---------------------|
@@ -1625,14 +1602,14 @@ Carl Bildt's (M) bourgeois four-party coalition (M+KD+FP+C) governed 1991–94.
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 2: Reinfeldt Alliance (2006–2014) — Success Model
+### Parallel 2: Reinfeldt Alliance (2006–2014) — Success Model
 
-### Summary
+#### Summary
 Fredrik Reinfeldt's "Alliance" (M+KD+FP+C) governed for two terms (2006–10, 2010–14). Key achievement: "arbetslinjen" — lowering unemployment by reducing social insurance generosity. Reinfeldt's 2010 re-election (first in M history) came after clear economic messaging.
 
 **Period**: 2006–2014 — within 40 years from 2026.
 
-### Parallels to 2026
+#### Parallels to 2026
 
 | Dimension | Reinfeldt 2006–14 | Kristersson 2022–26 |
 |-----------|-----------------|---------------------|
@@ -1648,14 +1625,14 @@ Fredrik Reinfeldt's "Alliance" (M+KD+FP+C) governed for two terms (2006–10, 20
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 3: 2021 Löfven Government Crisis — Support-Party Leverage
+### Parallel 3: 2021 Löfven Government Crisis — Support-Party Leverage
 
-### Summary
+#### Summary
 PM Stefan Löfven lost a vote of no confidence in June 2021 when SD + right-wing parties voted against the government. Löfven initially chose dissolution election, then resigned — Magdalena Andersson became PM. Lesson: support-party leverage can destabilise a minority government.
 
 **Period**: 2021 — within 40 years from 2026.
 
-### Parallels to 2026
+#### Parallels to 2026
 
 | Dimension | Löfven 2021 | Kristersson 2026 |
 |-----------|------------|-----------------|
@@ -1669,8 +1646,7 @@ PM Stefan Löfven lost a vote of no confidence in June 2021 when SD + right-wing
 **Source**: Riksdag records, konstitutionsutskottet proceedings (public records)
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Delivery-risk assessment per major legislation
@@ -1678,7 +1654,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Key Legislation Delivery Risk Register
+### Key Legislation Delivery Risk Register
 
 | Document | Type | Status | Implementation deadline | Delivery risk | Notes |
 |----------|------|--------|------------------------|---------------|-------|
@@ -1692,7 +1668,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Delivery Feasibility Matrix
+### Delivery Feasibility Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -1714,26 +1690,25 @@ quadrantChart
 
 ---
 
-## Critical Path Items
+### Critical Path Items
 
-### 1. May 1 — FiU48 tax relief activation
+#### 1. May 1 — FiU48 tax relief activation
 **Owner**: Skatteverket + Energimyndigheten
 **Risk**: Very low — administrative mechanism exists
 **Monitoring indicator**: Petrol station price data week of May 5
 
-### 2. June 4 — UFöU3 Chamber vote
+#### 2. June 4 — UFöU3 Chamber vote
 **Owner**: Riksdag + Försvarsdepartementet
 **Risk**: Low — cross-party support confirmed
 **Monitoring indicator**: Final vote margin > 200
 
-### 3. Q3 2026 — SfU18 social insurance implementation
+#### 3. Q3 2026 — SfU18 social insurance implementation
 **Owner**: Försäkringskassan
 **Risk**: HIGH — 39 reservations suggest political pressure to revise
 **Monitoring indicator**: Government announcement of implementation date before/after election
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — minimum 3 competing hypotheses
@@ -1741,9 +1716,9 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## ACH Matrix
+### ACH Matrix
 
-### Hypotheses
+#### Hypotheses
 
 | # | Hypothesis | Prior probability |
 |---|------------|-----------------|
@@ -1753,7 +1728,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-### Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix
+#### Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix
 
 | Evidence item | H1 | H2 | H3 |
 |---------------|----|----|-----|
@@ -1766,7 +1741,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | World Bank: stable GDP 0.82% | Consistent | Neutral | Neutral |
 | UFöU3 NATO deployment broad support | Consistent | Neutral | Neutral |
 
-### Hypothesis scores (+ = supports, - = contradicts, 0 = neutral)
+#### Hypothesis scores (+ = supports, - = contradicts, 0 = neutral)
 
 | Hypothesis | Score | Assessment |
 |------------|-------|-----------|
@@ -1776,7 +1751,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Counter-argument 1: H1 Challenge — "Fiscal Package is Pre-Election Spending, Not Consolidation"
+### Counter-argument 1: H1 Challenge — "Fiscal Package is Pre-Election Spending, Not Consolidation"
 
 **Claim**: HD03100 + HD01FiU48 represent electoral give-aways, not genuine fiscal management. The government is spending its fiscal space before September 2026.
 
@@ -1794,7 +1769,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Counter-argument 2: H2 Challenge — "S's FiU48 Vote Was Actually Strategically Wise"
+### Counter-argument 2: H2 Challenge — "S's FiU48 Vote Was Actually Strategically Wise"
 
 **Claim**: S's vote for HD01FiU48 is rational — it shows S as responsible, not reflexively oppositional. Voters trust a party that can vote for useful measures.
 
@@ -1812,7 +1787,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Counter-argument 3: H3 Refinement — "SD-M Fracture Is Real, Not Just Theater"
+### Counter-argument 3: H3 Refinement — "SD-M Fracture Is Real, Not Just Theater"
 
 **Claim**: SD's HD10429 interpellation represents a genuine policy dispute (demonstration rights) where SD believes the Prop. 133 restriction goes too far — exposing SD's civil-libertarian streak.
 
@@ -1829,8 +1804,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 **Net verdict**: H3 partially revised — 60% deliberate signal + 40% genuine policy dispute. [B2]
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: 7-dimension political classification
@@ -1838,9 +1812,9 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## 7-Dimension Classification
+### 7-Dimension Classification
 
-### Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment
+#### Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment
 
 | Document | Ideological alignment | Party | Notes |
 |----------|----------------------|-------|-------|
@@ -1851,7 +1825,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | SfU18 (social insurance) | Centre-left opposition | S/V/MP/C | 39 reservations against government |
 | HD03231 (Ukraine tribunal) | Liberal international order | Broad coalition | Human rights, rule of law |
 
-### Dimension 2: Policy Domain
+#### Dimension 2: Policy Domain
 
 | Domain | Key documents | Priority tier |
 |--------|---------------|---------------|
@@ -1863,7 +1837,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Foreign Affairs | HD03231, HD03232 | Tier 3 — Medium |
 | Digital/Infrastructure | HD01TU21, HD01TU17 | Tier 3 — Medium |
 
-### Dimension 3: Political Salience (Election 2026)
+#### Dimension 3: Political Salience (Election 2026)
 
 | Document | Electoral salience | Notes |
 |----------|--------------------|-------|
@@ -1874,7 +1848,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | UFöU3 | MEDIUM | Cross-party consensus, not divisive |
 | HD03240 | MEDIUM | Technical but structurally important |
 
-### Dimension 4: Constitutional Sensitivity
+#### Dimension 4: Constitutional Sensitivity
 
 | Document | Constitutional sensitivity | Notes |
 |----------|---------------------------|-------|
@@ -1883,7 +1857,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03235 | HIGH | ECHR proportionality challenge |
 | HD10429 | MEDIUM | Demonstration rights (fundamental freedom) |
 
-### Dimension 5: International Dimension
+#### Dimension 5: International Dimension
 
 | Document | International dimension | Treaty/agreement |
 |----------|------------------------|-----------------|
@@ -1894,7 +1868,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03214 | MEDIUM | EU NIS2 directive implementation |
 | HD03240 | MEDIUM | EU electricity market directive |
 
-### Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline
+#### Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline
 
 | Document | Urgency | Deadline |
 |----------|---------|---------|
@@ -1904,7 +1878,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03235 | MEDIUM | Enactment summer 2026 |
 | HD03240 | MEDIUM | Implementation autumn 2026 |
 
-### Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR Art. 9)
+#### Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR Art. 9)
 
 | Data type | Legal basis | Risk level |
 |-----------|------------|------------|
@@ -1915,7 +1889,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Priority Tier Summary
+### Priority Tier Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -1927,8 +1901,7 @@ pie title Document Distribution by Priority Tier
 ```
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: Tier-C Aggregation Cross-Reference (ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)
@@ -1936,7 +1909,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Sibling Analysis Folder References (Tier-C Gate Check 1)
+### Sibling Analysis Folder References (Tier-C Gate Check 1)
 
 This monthly review synthesises all single-type analyses from the period March 24–April 23, 2026:
 
@@ -1957,7 +1930,7 @@ This monthly review synthesises all single-type analyses from the period March 2
 
 ---
 
-## Document Cross-Reference Table
+### Document Cross-Reference Table
 
 | dok_id | Type | Referenced in | Connection |
 |--------|------|---------------|-----------|
@@ -1977,7 +1950,7 @@ This monthly review synthesises all single-type analyses from the period March 2
 
 ---
 
-## Thematic Continuity — Prior Monthly Review (Apr 19)
+### Thematic Continuity — Prior Monthly Review (Apr 19)
 
 | PIR from Apr 19 monthly-review | April 23 status | Evidence |
 |--------------------------------|-----------------|---------|
@@ -1987,15 +1960,14 @@ This monthly review synthesises all single-type analyses from the period March 2
 | PIR-7: Energy reform pace | **PROGRESSING** — HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239 in committee | Energy committee bills |
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
 **Framework**: ICD 203 audit + SAT catalog + osint-tradecraft-standards.md
 
 ---
 
-## ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)
+### ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)
 
 | ICD 203 Standard | Applied? | Notes |
 |------------------|---------|-------|
@@ -2011,7 +1983,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)
+### SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)
 
 | # | SAT Technique | Applied in | Notes |
 |---|---------------|-----------|-------|
@@ -2030,23 +2002,23 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Methodology Improvements for Future Runs
+### Methodology Improvements for Future Runs
 
-### Improvement 1: Early MCP Data Validation
+#### Improvement 1: Early MCP Data Validation
 **Issue observed**: Data download relied on meta-summaries from sibling folders; direct MCP queries for April 20–23 documents were not comprehensively executed.
 **Improvement**: Future monthly-review runs should explicitly query `search_dokument` with `from_date: "$PERIOD_END - 7 days"` to ensure the most recent period (which most prior runs have not covered) is fully downloaded.
 
-### Improvement 2: Automated PIR Tracking
+#### Improvement 2: Automated PIR Tracking
 **Issue observed**: Prior-cycle PIR resolution required manual reading of April 19 monthly-review `synthesis-summary.md`. This is error-prone and time-consuming.
 **Improvement**: Implement a `pir-tracking.md` artifact in each monthly-review folder that is machine-readable. Each run should parse the prior cycle's file and auto-populate the "Carried-forward PIRs" table.
 
-### Improvement 3: Coalition Mathematics Automation
+#### Improvement 3: Coalition Mathematics Automation
 **Issue observed**: Seat counts for Mermaid diagrams required manual tallying against 349-seat Riksdag.
 **Improvement**: Create a `scripts/coalition-calculator.ts` script that accepts a list of parties and their current seat counts (from riksdag-regering MCP ledamöter statistics) and outputs both a seat-count table and Mermaid gantt chart. This would be reusable across all monthly, weekly, and election workflows.
 
 ---
 
-## Information Gaps Identified
+### Information Gaps Identified
 
 | Gap | Impact | PIR? |
 |-----|--------|------|
@@ -2058,7 +2030,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Tradecraft Standards Met
+### Tradecraft Standards Met
 
 - **Offentlighetsprincipen**: All sources public — riksdagen.se, regeringen.se, World Bank open data
 - **GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)**: Political opinions referenced only where publicly made by MPs in official capacity
@@ -2066,8 +2038,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **Data minimisation**: No private contact information, personal health data, or non-public communications referenced
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Workflow**: news-monthly-review
 **Run ID**: 24810587515
@@ -2080,7 +2051,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Reference Analyses Ingested (Tier-C cross-type synthesis)
+### Reference Analyses Ingested (Tier-C cross-type synthesis)
 
 | Date | Subfolder | Synthesis Summary | Key PIRs |
 |------|-----------|-------------------|----------|
@@ -2100,7 +2071,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Key Documents (Primary Sources)
+### Key Documents (Primary Sources)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Type | Date | Committee | Full-text | Source URL |
 |--------|-------|------|------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -2131,7 +2102,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Economic Data Sources
+### Economic Data Sources
 
 | Source | Indicator | Value | Year |
 |--------|-----------|-------|------|
@@ -2144,8 +2115,42 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## MCP Server Notes
+### MCP Server Notes
 
 - riksdag-regering: LIVE — all tools responsive, `get_sync_status` confirmed at 2026-04-23T00:55:40Z
 - world-bank: LIVE — economic data retrieved successfully
 - scb: Not queried (monthly review uses cross-type synthesis from sibling analysis)
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03235-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10429-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10442-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/UFöU3-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UFöU3-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/article.md
index 494387a938..ce57f18140 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-23
 subfolder: motions
 slug: 2026-04-23-motions
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.923Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.721Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,18 +26,17 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 April 2026 challenging the government's extra supplementary budget (prop. 2025/26:236), deportation law reform (prop. 2025/26:235), new arms export framework (prop. 2025/26:228), and new asylum reception law (prop. 2025/26:229). The sharpest cleavage is over the government's temporary fuel tax cut to EU minimum levels: S, V, and MP all oppose it but for divergent reasons, signalling that the centre-left opposition cannot coalesce behind a single counter-proposal ahead of the autumn 2026 election.
 
 ---
 
-## 🧭 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Media & editorial framing**: Determine whether the energy/budget dispute should lead as a "fiscal credibility" or "climate policy" story — evidence below supports both framings simultaneously.
 2. **Election intelligence**: Assess whether opposition fragmentation on fiscal and migration issues reduces the probability of a left-of-centre government change in autumn 2026.
@@ -45,7 +44,7 @@ Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 Ap
 
 ---
 
-## ⚡ 60-Second Read
+### ⚡ 60-Second Read
 
 - **Budget clash**: S wants better-targeted electricity support and flexible use of grid-congestion revenues (HD024082 by Mikael Damberg). V demands the entire fuel tax cut be rejected — cites RUT analysis showing government reforms benefiting top half of income distribution 5× more than the bottom half (HD024092, Nooshi Dadgostar). MP likewise opposes fuel cut; cites Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, and Trafikverket as opposing the proposal (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson).
 - **Deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235)**: V demands full rejection of stricter deportation rules (HD024090, Tony Haddou); C accepts with conditions requiring systematic repeat offences (HD024095, Niels Paarup-Petersen); MP partial rejection (HD024097, Annika Hirvonen).
@@ -55,13 +54,13 @@ Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 Ap
 
 ---
 
-## 🔭 Top Forward Trigger
+### 🔭 Top Forward Trigger
 
 **FiU committee vote on Extra ändringsbudget (prop. 2025/26:236)** — expected within 3–4 weeks. If SD votes with the government as expected, the fuel tax cut will pass. Watch for any SD amendment demands as a pivotal indicator of coalition stability.
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 Significance Ranking (DIW weighted)
+### 📊 Significance Ranking (DIW weighted)
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
@@ -84,18 +83,17 @@ quadrantChart
 *Confidence: HIGH overall [B2]; individual document scores reflect manifest data + full text where available.*
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Lead Story: Energy-Climate Fault Line Fractures Opposition Bloc
+### Lead Story: Energy-Climate Fault Line Fractures Opposition Bloc
 
 The week of 13–17 April 2026 produced the spring session's most revealing clash of opposition values: three parties — Socialdemokraterna (S), Vänsterpartiet (V), and Miljöpartiet (MP) — all oppose the government's extra supplementary budget for 2026 (prop. 2025/26:236) but cannot agree on a common alternative. S demands better-designed electricity support and more flexible use of grid-congestion (flaskhals) revenues (dok_id: HD024082, Mikael Damberg m.fl.). V invokes a RUT distributional analysis showing the government's mandate-period reforms have benefited the top income half 5× more than the bottom half, and demands the fuel tax cut be rejected outright (HD024092, Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl.). MP cites a coalition of expert agencies — Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Trafikverket — as opposing the fuel tax reduction on climate and investment-certainty grounds (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson m.fl.).
 
 ---
 
-## DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking
+### DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title (abbreviated) | Submitter | DIW | Significance |
 |------|--------|---------------------|-----------|-----|-------------|
@@ -113,29 +111,29 @@ The week of 13–17 April 2026 produced the spring session's most revealing clas
 
 ---
 
-## Integrated Intelligence Picture
+### Integrated Intelligence Picture
 
 Three interlocking policy battles define this week's opposition motions:
 
-### 1. Fiscal-Energy Battle (FiU jurisdiction)
+#### 1. Fiscal-Energy Battle (FiU jurisdiction)
 
 The government's Extra ändringsbudget (prop. 2025/26:236) proposes: (a) temporary fuel tax reduction to EU energy directive minimum 1 May–30 Sep 2026 and (b) 3.4 billion SEK in electricity support (1 bn previously allocated + 2.4 bn new). **S** (HD024082) does not oppose the electricity support amount but criticises its design — approximately 800,000 households in housing cooperatives with shared electricity contracts will not qualify. S demands the government return with proposals for targeted, equitable electricity support and for more flexible use of grid-congestion revenues. **V** (HD024092) goes further: rejects the fuel tax cut entirely, cites RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158 and 2025:1607) showing regressive distributional effects, and argues climate transition requirements override short-term relief. **MP** (HD024098) aligns with V on the fuel tax but grounds the argument in expert agency consensus — the proposal "risks deepening Sweden's fossil fuel dependency."
 
 Intelligence assessment: The fuel tax cut is likely to pass (SD will vote with government), but the opposition's fragmented response reflects a deeper strategic disagreement about whether to fight the government on fiscal credibility (S's approach), distributional justice (V), or climate integrity (MP). This fragmentation is a structural vulnerability ahead of 2026 elections.
 
-### 2. Migration/Crime Nexus (SfU jurisdiction)
+#### 2. Migration/Crime Nexus (SfU jurisdiction)
 
 **Prop. 2025/26:235** (stricter deportation): Would lower threshold so any sentence stricter than a fine is deportation-eligible; remove protection for those who arrived before age 15; require prosecutors to seek deportation in all eligible cases; and ignore enforcement barriers at the general courts stage. Both **Lagrådet** (the Council on Legislation) and numerous remiss bodies opposed the reforms. V (HD024090) demands full rejection. C (HD024095) accepts deportation in principle but wants systematic repeated offences to be required, not single incidents. MP (HD024097) partly rejects — supports some changes (aggravated assault provisions, 8 kap. 1 §) but not the broad lowering of the threshold.
 
 **Prop. 2025/26:229** (new reception law/Mottagandelag): Would centralise asylum housing; the government takes over full responsibility from municipalities. C (HD024089) broadly supports the framework but opposes: (a) removing municipalities' right to give emergency welfare assistance and (b) "areas restrictions" (områdespolicies). S (HD024080) opposes privatisation of asylum housing. MP (HD024087) rejects the entire proposition.
 
-### 3. Arms Export Regulation (UU jurisdiction)
+#### 3. Arms Export Regulation (UU jurisdiction)
 
 **Prop. 2025/26:228** (new krigsmateriel framework): MP (HD024096) demands: (1) a complete ban on arms exports to dictatorships, warring nations, and major human rights violators; (2) mandatory consideration of third-country diversion risk; (3) rejection of the new secrecy provisions on software/technology (citing Lagrådet criticism). V (HD024091) opposes the entire proposition.
 
 ---
 
-## AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 - **Title**: "Split Opposition Challenges Sweden's Fuel-Tax Budget and Deportation Laws"  
 - **Meta description**: "Sweden's Social Democrats, Left Party and Greens all oppose the government's fuel tax cut — but offer incompatible alternatives, revealing a fractured opposition ahead of autumn 2026 elections."  
@@ -143,7 +141,7 @@ Intelligence assessment: The fuel tax cut is likely to pass (SD will vote with g
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Policy Battle Map
+### Mermaid: Policy Battle Map
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TB
@@ -179,8 +177,7 @@ flowchart TB
 ```
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
 **Classification**: PUBLIC  
@@ -188,7 +185,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment KJ-1: Opposition Fragmentation is the Dominant Political Story
+### Key Judgment KJ-1: Opposition Fragmentation is the Dominant Political Story
 
 **Confidence: HIGH**
 
@@ -198,7 +195,7 @@ The most significant intelligence output from this week's motions is not any ind
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment KJ-2: Government's Legislative Program is Expert-Isolated
+### Key Judgment KJ-2: Government's Legislative Program is Expert-Isolated
 
 **Confidence: HIGH**
 
@@ -208,7 +205,7 @@ The government faces unprecedented expert agency opposition to its supplementary
 
 ---
 
-## Key Judgment KJ-3: Migration Policy Arena is the Key 2026 Electoral Battleground
+### Key Judgment KJ-3: Migration Policy Arena is the Key 2026 Electoral Battleground
 
 **Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH**
 
@@ -218,7 +215,7 @@ The week's migration motions (HD024089, HD024090, HD024095, HD024097, HD024080,
 
 ---
 
-## PIR Handoff for Next Intelligence Cycle
+### PIR Handoff for Next Intelligence Cycle
 
 - **PIR-1 (Government stability)**: Monitor SD's FiU vote on prop. 2025/26:236. Any SD amendment demands = first crack in coalition.
 - **PIR-3 (Policy reform)**: Track FiU and SfU committee dates. If FiU fast-tracks before May 15, opposition loses deliberation window.
@@ -227,7 +224,7 @@ The week's migration motions (HD024089, HD024090, HD024095, HD024097, HD024080,
 
 ---
 
-## Key Assumptions Check
+### Key Assumptions Check
 
 | Assumption | Validity | Risk if wrong |
 |-----------|----------|---------------|
@@ -237,12 +234,11 @@ The week's migration motions (HD024089, HD024090, HD024095, HD024097, HD024080,
 | Courts will not issue interim stay on deportation law | HIGH confidence short-term | If ECtHR acts unusually fast, scenario 3 activated |
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix
+### DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Depth | Intelligence | Width | DIW Score | Tier |
 |------|--------|-------|-------------|-------|-----------|------|
@@ -260,7 +256,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Ranked Items with Evidence
+### Ranked Items with Evidence
 
 1. **HD024082** — S motion on Extra ändringsbudget: Mikael Damberg och Socialdemokraterna kräver ett rättvisare elstöd för 800,000 bostadsrättsinnehavare som exkluderats av regeringens design. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] `[B2]` IMPACT: HIGH — defines S budget profile pre-election.
 
@@ -276,14 +272,14 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Sensitivity Analysis
+### Sensitivity Analysis
 
 - **Downside risk**: If FiU adds conditions making the fuel tax cut contingent on SD support for other measures, the entire budget picture shifts.
 - **Upside**: If the Mottagandelag passes with C support but faces constitutional review, the judicial dimension adds a new policy layer.
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram
+### Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d", "textColor": "#e0e0e0"}}}%%
@@ -298,12 +294,11 @@ xychart-beta
 *Sources: riksdagen.se document metadata + full-text analysis. Admiralty [B2] for document-derived scores; [A2] for multi-agency corroborated items.*
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Primary Frame War: "Relief" vs. "Justice"
+### Primary Frame War: "Relief" vs. "Justice"
 
 The dominant narrative battle this week is between the government's "relief" frame and the opposition's "justice" frame:
 
@@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ The dominant narrative battle this week is between the government's "relief" fra
 
 ---
 
-## Secondary Frame: "Rule of Law" vs. "Deterrence"
+### Secondary Frame: "Rule of Law" vs. "Deterrence"
 
 **V/MP frame (HD024090)**: The deportation law is unconstitutional, legally incoherent, and Lagrådet-rejected. "Rättssäkerheten" (rule of law) is under attack.
 
@@ -327,7 +322,7 @@ The dominant narrative battle this week is between the government's "relief" fra
 
 ---
 
-## Media Amplification Probability
+### Media Amplification Probability
 
 | Topic | Predicted amplification | Reason |
 |-------|------------------------|--------|
@@ -339,21 +334,20 @@ The dominant narrative battle this week is between the government's "relief" fra
 
 ---
 
-## Social Media Hypothesis
+### Social Media Hypothesis
 
 On platforms prioritising emotional resonance (Instagram, TikTok), the "800,000 households excluded" narrative (S) and "Lagrådet says it's illegal" narrative (V/MP) are the most shareable. The distributional data in V's motion requires more text than a social post allows.
 
 *Note: No social media monitoring data available. Assessment is structural inference from content analysis [C3].*
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
+### 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
 
-### Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties
+#### Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties
 
 | Party | Position | Key Actor | Primary Motion | Strategic Interest |
 |-------|----------|-----------|----------------|-------------------|
@@ -364,7 +358,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | SD — Sverigedemokraterna | Expected to support government across all four propositions | (no motions filed in this cluster) | — | Coalition stability; border control narrative |
 | M, L, KD | Expected to support government | — | — | Government parties |
 
-### Lens 2: Civil Society & Expert Bodies
+#### Lens 2: Civil Society & Expert Bodies
 
 | Actor | Position | Basis | Admiralty |
 |-------|----------|-------|-----------|
@@ -376,7 +370,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Trafikverket | Opposed fuel tax cut | Transport sector mandate | [A2] |
 | Remiss bodies on HD024090 | Extensive criticism of deportation reform | Rule-of-law analysis | [A2] |
 
-### Lens 3: Voters & Affected Populations
+#### Lens 3: Voters & Affected Populations
 
 | Group | Affected by | Stakes |
 |-------|-------------|--------|
@@ -386,7 +380,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Environment-concerned voters (~25–30% of electorate) | MP motion HD024098 — climate signal from fuel tax cut | Long-term fossil fuel dependency |
 | Asylum seekers and municipalities | Reception law prop. 2025/26:229 | Municipal welfare, area restrictions |
 
-### Lens 4: Media & Narrative Agents
+#### Lens 4: Media & Narrative Agents
 
 | Frame | Promoted by | Risk for opposition |
 |-------|-------------|---------------------|
@@ -395,7 +389,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | "Climate backslide" | MP + green media | True but niche; low penetration in election swing voters |
 | "Rule of law erosion" | V + legal NGOs | Strong for base mobilisation; limited mainstream appeal |
 
-### Lens 5: International Actors
+#### Lens 5: International Actors
 
 | Actor | Concern | Basis |
 |-------|---------|-------|
@@ -403,7 +397,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | Arms recipient states | Stricter Swedish export controls (MP demands) would restrict flows | HD024096 — explicit demand for export bans [B2] |
 | UNHCR / EU migration agencies | Stricter deportation thresholds and new reception framework | HD024090, HD024089 [B2] |
 
-### Lens 6: Institutional Actors
+#### Lens 6: Institutional Actors
 
 | Actor | Role | Interest |
 |-------|------|---------|
@@ -414,7 +408,7 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 
 ---
 
-## Influence Network
+### Influence Network
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
@@ -441,95 +435,94 @@ graph LR
 ```
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Indicator Framework
+### Indicator Framework
 
 This file tracks 12 dated indicators across 4 horizons (30-day, 90-day, 6-month, 12-month) that would confirm or refute the key judgments in `intelligence-assessment.md`.
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 1: 30-Day Indicators (May 2026)
+### Horizon 1: 30-Day Indicators (May 2026)
 
-### IND-01: FiU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)
+#### IND-01: FiU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)
 - **Expected date**: ~May 5, 2026 (FiU scheduled)
 - **Indicator**: Does FiU adopt S's design amendment (HD024082)? Yes = KJ-1 partially refuted (opposition succeeded). No = KJ-1 confirmed.
 - **Trigger threshold**: Any S, V, or MP amendment adopted by FiU majority
 - **Confidence**: HIGH [A2] that vote will occur; MEDIUM [B2] that government amendments will prevail
 
-### IND-02: Skatteverket Implementation Notice
+#### IND-02: Skatteverket Implementation Notice
 - **Expected date**: ~May 1, 2026 (law comes into force)
 - **Indicator**: Does official implementation guidance include or exclude cooperative housing (*bostadsrättsföreningar*)? Exclusion confirmed = HD024082 validated; political cost to government elevated.
 - **Confidence**: HIGH [A1] that notice will be published
 
-### IND-03: SfU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law)
+#### IND-03: SfU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law)
 - **Expected date**: ~May 12, 2026
 - **Indicator**: Does SfU include any C amendments? C amendment adopted = coalition complexity signal.
 - **Confidence**: HIGH [A1] that vote will occur
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 2: 90-Day Indicators (June–July 2026)
+### Horizon 2: 90-Day Indicators (June–July 2026)
 
-### IND-04: First Deportation Under New Law
+#### IND-04: First Deportation Under New Law
 - **Expected date**: June–July 2026 (Migrationsverket implementation)
 - **Indicator**: Is the first deportation case published? Does it produce a court challenge?
 - **Confidence**: MEDIUM [B2] that early cases will be filed quickly
 
-### IND-05: MP Poll Result (4% threshold)
+#### IND-05: MP Poll Result (4% threshold)
 - **Expected date**: Any major poll, June–July 2026
 - **Indicator**: MP at/above 4% = electoral calculation shifts. MP below 4% = coalition arithmetic for S+V more difficult.
 - **Confidence**: HIGH [A1] that polls will be published; threshold outcome is MEDIUM [C3]
 
-### IND-06: S+V+MP Joint Election Platform Statement
+#### IND-06: S+V+MP Joint Election Platform Statement
 - **Expected date**: June 2026 (traditional alliance-building period)
 - **Indicator**: A joint platform on energy would refute H1 (fragmentation is strategic differentiation) and confirm H1-alt (genuine coordination).
 - **Confidence**: MEDIUM [B3] that some form of coordination statement emerges; quality uncertain
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 3: 6-Month Indicators (September–October 2026)
+### Horizon 3: 6-Month Indicators (September–October 2026)
 
-### IND-07: 2026 Election Polling Trend
+#### IND-07: 2026 Election Polling Trend
 - **Expected date**: Ongoing, key snapshot September 2026
 - **Indicator**: If government coalition (M+SD+KD+L) polling above 175 seats → KJ-1 (fragmentation = government advantage) confirmed.
 - **Confidence**: HIGH [A1] that polls will be published
 
-### IND-08: C's Final Alliance Declaration
+#### IND-08: C's Final Alliance Declaration
 - **Expected date**: C autumn congress, September 2026 (est.)
 - **Indicator**: C declares coalition preference. C → left = major political realignment. C → right = status quo confirmed.
 - **Confidence**: MEDIUM [B2] that C will clarify before election campaign
 
-### IND-09: Arms Export Policy Development
+#### IND-09: Arms Export Policy Development
 - **Expected date**: Summer/autumn 2026 (Riksdag follows up HD024096)
 - **Indicator**: Any governmental communication on arms export secrecy provisions (opposed by MP in HD024096). Government concession = small HD024096 victory.
 - **Confidence**: LOW [C3]
 
 ---
 
-## Horizon 4: 12-Month Indicators (Spring 2027)
+### Horizon 4: 12-Month Indicators (Spring 2027)
 
-### IND-10: ECtHR Case Registration
+#### IND-10: ECtHR Case Registration
 - **Expected date**: Autumn 2026–Spring 2027 (cases filed after law implementation)
 - **Indicator**: ECtHR registers case against Sweden under ECHR Art. 8 related to prop. 2025/26:235. Registration = medium-term legal risk elevated (KJ-2 confirmed on legal dimension).
 - **Confidence**: MEDIUM [B2]
 
-### IND-11: Migrationsverket Capacity Report
+#### IND-11: Migrationsverket Capacity Report
 - **Expected date**: Q1 2027 (annual report)
 - **Indicator**: Migrationsverket reports implementation difficulties with new Mottagandelagen. Friction confirmed = C's HD024089 concerns validated.
 - **Confidence**: MEDIUM [B3]
 
-### IND-12: Post-Election Coalition Negotiations
+#### IND-12: Post-Election Coalition Negotiations
 - **Expected date**: September–November 2026 (post-election)
 - **Indicator**: Who negotiates with whom? If S+C talks emerge seriously, KJ-3 (C as pivotal actor) fully confirmed. If Tidö 2.0 forms without modification, KJ-1 (fragmentation cost opposition the election) confirmed.
 - **Confidence**: HIGH [A1] that negotiations will occur
 
 ---
 
-## Indicator Summary Matrix
+### Indicator Summary Matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark"}}%%
@@ -555,28 +548,27 @@ gantt
 ```
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Scenarios for Spring 2026 Parliamentary Outcome
+### Scenarios for Spring 2026 Parliamentary Outcome
 
-### Scenario 1: Government Wins All Four Propositions (Most Likely)
+#### Scenario 1: Government Wins All Four Propositions (Most Likely)
 **Probability**: 65% [C2]  
 **Narrative**: SD and the four-party government coalition pass prop. 2025/26:235, 236, 228, and 229 intact. Opposition motions (HD024082–098, HD024090–097, HD024096, HD024089–091) are voted down in committee and plenary. The fuel tax cut takes effect 1 May 2026. Deportation rules tighten 1 September 2026.  
 **Why likely**: SD has been reliable since the Tidö agreement; no by-election pressure; C partially supporting migration proposals.  
 **Leading indicator**: Monitor FiU committee vote date (est. late April/early May 2026). If S/V/MP cannot coordinate to delay, Scenario 1 is confirmed.  
 **Impact on opposition**: Deepens fragmentation narrative; V/MP locked into protest stance; S under pressure to differentiate from V.
 
-### Scenario 2: Budget Propositions Modified — C Demands Concessions (Plausible)
+#### Scenario 2: Budget Propositions Modified — C Demands Concessions (Plausible)
 **Probability**: 22% [C3]  
 **Narrative**: C leverages its SfU position to demand changes to the Mottagandelag area-restriction provisions (HD024089) in exchange for abstention on the fuel tax supplementary. Government makes minor concessions. S, V, MP motions still voted down. Electricity support design is tweaked but 800k cooperative households remain partially excluded.  
 **Why plausible**: C has a track record of extracting symbolic wins on migration (see 2023 Tidö addendum). Niels Paarup-Petersen's motion (HD024089) is specifically calibrated to be acceptable as a negotiating position.  
 **Leading indicator**: Any informal contact between C leadership and government whips in the two weeks before FiU vote.  
 **Impact**: Partial vindication for C; S/V/MP still lose but narrative shifts to "C saves municipal welfare."
 
-### Scenario 3: Lagrådet Rejection Creates Constitutional Crisis on Deportation Law (Low probability, High impact)
+#### Scenario 3: Lagrådet Rejection Creates Constitutional Crisis on Deportation Law (Low probability, High impact)
 **Probability**: 13% [D3]  
 **Narrative**: After prop. 2025/26:235 passes, an immediate constitutional challenge is mounted by legal NGOs citing Lagrådet's opinion. The Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) issues an interim stay on the deportation expansion for those who arrived before age 15. Government embarrassed; V (HD024090, Tony Haddou) vindicated. This delays implementation beyond the September 2026 target and becomes a major election issue.  
 **Why low probability**: Courts rarely issue interim stays on legislation; Lagrådet opinions are advisory, not binding. But the specific removal of childhood-arrival protections is a ECHR Art. 8 (family life) flashpoint.  
@@ -585,7 +577,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Probability Summary
+### Scenario Probability Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
@@ -599,7 +591,7 @@ pie title Scenario Probability Distribution — Spring 2026 Legislative Outcome
 
 ---
 
-## Leading Indicators per Scenario
+### Leading Indicators per Scenario
 
 | Indicator | Triggers | Timeline |
 |-----------|----------|----------|
@@ -610,12 +602,11 @@ pie title Scenario Probability Distribution — Spring 2026 Legislative Outcome
 | SD amendment demand on energy proposition | New Scenario possible | April–May 2026 |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 5-Dimension Risk Register
+### 5-Dimension Risk Register
 
 | Risk ID | Description | Likelihood (1–5) | Impact (1–5) | L×I | Trend | Evidence |
 |---------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|-----|-------|----------|
@@ -629,15 +620,15 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 10)
+### Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 10)
 
-### R-04 — Opposition Fragmentation [HIGH RISK, L×I = 15]
+#### R-04 — Opposition Fragmentation [HIGH RISK, L×I = 15]
 
 The most severe risk for democratic accountability: when S, V, and MP cannot agree on a budget alternative, the government faces no unified opposition. Evidence: three separate motions (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) against the same government proposition, each with a different analytical framework and policy demand. This is structurally worse than the 2022–23 budget period when S and V coordinated more frequently.
 
 **Cascading chain**: Fragmentation → no alternative budget → government wins FiU vote → fuel tax implemented → climate agencies increase criticism → media shifts to "government vs experts" framing → opposition fails to capture narrative.
 
-### R-02 + R-03 — Social Policy Double Jeopardy [HIGH RISK, L×I = 12 each]
+#### R-02 + R-03 — Social Policy Double Jeopardy [HIGH RISK, L×I = 12 each]
 
 Two simultaneous social policy risks create a compound exposure: (1) electricity support design flaw disproportionately affects cooperative housing (S: HD024082); (2) deportation law challenged as unconstitutional by Lagrådet with likely court litigation (V: HD024090). Either alone is manageable; together they strain public trust in government competence.
 
@@ -645,7 +636,7 @@ Two simultaneous social policy risks create a compound exposure: (1) electricity
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Risk Heat Map
+### Mermaid: Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
@@ -669,38 +660,37 @@ quadrantChart
 *Confidence: MEDIUM [B2–C3]. Risk scores based on parliamentary patterns + primary documents.*
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23 | **Confidence**: HIGH [B2]  
 **Framing**: Strengths/Weaknesses of the *opposition bloc's* motion strategy; Opportunities/Threats from *their* political perspective.
 
 ---
 
-## SWOT Matrix
+### SWOT Matrix
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 - **Expert agency backing for climate framing**: MP's HD024098 cites Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet and Trafikverket as opposing the fuel tax cut — an unusually strong expert consensus. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098] `[A2]`
 - **Lagrådet criticism of deportation law**: V's HD024090 highlights that Lagrådet explicitly advised against prop. 2025/26:235, strengthening the human rights argument. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090] `[A1]`
 - **Distributional evidence for V**: V's HD024092 invokes RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158 + dnr 2025:1607) showing the government's reforms disproportionately benefit top-income deciles. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092] `[A2]`
 - **S credibility on electricity design flaw**: 800,000 households in shared-grid housing cooperatives excluded from S-identified design flaw, giving S a concrete, relatable grievance. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] `[B1]`
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 - **Fragmentation undermines narrative unity**: S, V, and MP all oppose the budget supplementary but offer incompatible alternatives (different electricity support models, different rationales). No single motion by multiple parties. [HD024082, HD024092, HD024098 — three separate dok_ids, same proposition, zero joint motion] `[B1]`
 - **C defection on migration**: C (HD024089, HD024095) broadly accepts both the new Mottagandelag and the deportation framework with modifications, breaking centre-left solidarity. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089, HD024095] `[B1]`
 - **No budget alternative quantified**: S (HD024082) demands better electricity support design but does not specify a costed alternative in the motion text. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] `[B2]`
 - **Arms export motion (HD024096) unlikely to pass**: With SD, M, L, KD backing government arms policy, MP's export ban demand is politically isolated. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096] `[B2]`
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 - **Election framing window**: The 2026 election provides a six-month window to build a joint opposition narrative around energy transition + distributional justice — the motion cluster provides raw material. [aggregate assessment, no single dok_id] `[C3]`
 - **Constitutional review potential**: If Mottagandelag area-restrictions violate kommunal självstyre principles, judicial review could embarrass the government. [HD024089 cites constitutional concerns; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089] `[C3]`
 - **Agency credibility cascade**: If Konjunkturinstitutet issues a formal advisory against the fuel tax (beyond the remiss stage), it upgrades the opposition's credibility posture. [HD024098 — remiss phase already hostile] `[B3]`
 - **Lagrådet precedent on deportation**: If courts challenge prop. 2025/26:235 implementation (as Lagrådet suggested they might), V's motion record becomes prescient. [HD024090] `[C3]`
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 - **SD-government bloc solidarity**: SD's reliable coalition support for the government means all three motion clusters will likely be voted down. [structural observation based on riksmöte 2025/26 voting patterns] `[B1]`
 - **Economic relief narrative overrides climate concerns**: Rising energy prices give the government a populist justification; opposition parties risk appearing elitist by opposing fuel price relief. [HD024092, HD024098 acknowledge this framing risk] `[B2]`
@@ -709,7 +699,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## TOWS Matrix
+### TOWS Matrix
 
 | | Strengths (Expert consensus, Lagrådet) | Weaknesses (Fragmentation, no costed alt.) |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -718,13 +708,13 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 
 ---
 
-## Cross-SWOT: Migration vs Energy
+### Cross-SWOT: Migration vs Energy
 
 The opposition's tactical problem: energy opponents (V, MP) and migration opponents (all but C) are the same parties, but their framing strategies diverge. MP emphasises expert consensus; V emphasises distributional justice; S emphasises design quality. A unified "alternative governance" framing would require S to explicitly endorse V's distributional frame — currently politically infeasible.
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: SWOT Summary
+### Mermaid: SWOT Summary
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
@@ -749,16 +739,15 @@ quadrantChart
 *Admiralty codes assigned per evidence type: government documents [A1], corroborated reports [A2], single-source official [B1], peer-reviewed public [B2], unconfirmed open-source [C3]*
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy
+### Political Threat Taxonomy
 
 Threats assessed against **democratic accountability norms** and **opposition party viability**.
 
-### T-1: Legislative Steamrolling (Primary Threat)
+#### T-1: Legislative Steamrolling (Primary Threat)
 - **Category**: Institutional integrity
 - **Actor**: Tidewater coalition (M, SD, KD, L) + occasional C
 - **Mechanism**: Majority votes all motions down in committee (FiU, SfU, UU) without substantive engagement with expert agency criticism
@@ -766,7 +755,7 @@ Threats assessed against **democratic accountability norms** and **opposition pa
 - **TTP analog**: "Vote dominance" — structural majority used without negotiation
 - **Admiralty**: [A2]
 
-### T-2: Distributional Justice Erosion (Social Threat)
+#### T-2: Distributional Justice Erosion (Social Threat)
 - **Category**: Social cohesion
 - **Actor**: Government fiscal policy
 - **Mechanism**: Successive reforms favoring upper-income deciles; RUT analysis cited in V motion (HD024092) shows 5:1 ratio of benefit to top vs. bottom income halves
@@ -774,7 +763,7 @@ Threats assessed against **democratic accountability norms** and **opposition pa
 - **Kill chain stage**: Policy formulation → implementation → distributional outcome → public trust erosion
 - **Admiralty**: [A2]
 
-### T-3: Constitutional Overreach on Deportation (Rule-of-Law Threat)
+#### T-3: Constitutional Overreach on Deportation (Rule-of-Law Threat)
 - **Category**: Constitutional order
 - **Actor**: Government (prop. 2025/26:235)
 - **Mechanism**: Removing age-based protections for migrants who arrived before 15; removing enforcement-barrier review from general courts; mandatory prosecution of all eligible cases
@@ -782,7 +771,7 @@ Threats assessed against **democratic accountability norms** and **opposition pa
 - **TTP**: "Incremental erosion" of judicial review rights
 - **Admiralty**: [A1]
 
-### T-4: Climate Policy Regression (Environmental Threat)
+#### T-4: Climate Policy Regression (Environmental Threat)
 - **Category**: Long-term governance
 - **Actor**: Government energy policy
 - **Mechanism**: Temporary fuel tax cut undermines carbon pricing signals; 2030 emissions targets at risk
@@ -791,7 +780,7 @@ Threats assessed against **democratic accountability norms** and **opposition pa
 
 ---
 
-## Attack Tree: Democratic Accountability Degradation
+### Attack Tree: Democratic Accountability Degradation
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
@@ -830,7 +819,7 @@ flowchart TD
 
 ---
 
-## MITRE-Style TTP Mapping
+### MITRE-Style TTP Mapping
 
 | TTP ID | Name | Tactic | Technique | Evidence |
 |--------|------|--------|-----------|----------|
@@ -844,8 +833,7 @@ flowchart TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD024077
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024077-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024077-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024077
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -853,27 +841,26 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024077-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true`.
 
 **Action required (Run 2)**: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.
 
 ### HD024079
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024079-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024079-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024079
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -881,27 +868,26 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024079-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true`.
 
 **Action required (Run 2)**: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.
 
 ### HD024080
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024080-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024080-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024080
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -909,27 +895,26 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024080-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true`.
 
 **Action required (Run 2)**: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.
 
 ### HD024082
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024082-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024082  
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
@@ -939,33 +924,32 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 S motion opposing prop. 2025/26:236's supplementary budget. Core argument: the electricity support scheme has a design flaw that excludes approximately 800,000 cooperative housing (*bostadsrätt*) households. S proposes amending the design to include these households, not cancelling the energy support overall.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 8/10. This is the flagship opposition budget motion from the largest opposition party, filed by the former Prime Minister (Damberg). It will attract maximal media attention and define S's pre-election fiscal narrative.
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 1. 800,000 cooperative housing households are excluded from electricity support by a design flaw.
 2. The design flaw is amendable — does not require rejecting the entire proposition.
 3. S positions itself as the "competent alternative" that would fix, not block, energy support.
 
-## Cross-Reference
+### Cross-Reference
 
 - Links to HD024092 (V: reject entire fuel tax cut), HD024098 (MP: same rejection) — shows S is the moderate among the three opposition actors.
 - Links to `coalition-mathematics.md` — S's amendment (if adopted by FiU) would require government concession.
 - Links to `forward-indicators.md` IND-01 (FiU vote) and IND-02 (Skatteverket implementation notice).
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 The exact number of excluded households (800,000) is S's figure — not independently verified from Skatteverket data. [B2]
 
 ### HD024086
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024086-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024086-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024086
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -973,27 +957,26 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024086-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true`.
 
 **Action required (Run 2)**: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.
 
 ### HD024087
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024087-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024087-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024087
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -1001,27 +984,26 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024087-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true`.
 
 **Action required (Run 2)**: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.
 
 ### HD024089
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024089-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024089-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024089  
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
@@ -1031,34 +1013,33 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024089-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 C motion on the new reception law (*Mottagandelagen*). C broadly accepts the framework but opposes specific provisions: area restrictions on asylum seekers and the absence of guaranteed emergency welfare rights for municipalities hosting large reception centres.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 7/10. Reveals C's pragmatic liberalism on migration — neither fully supporting the restrictive government framework nor opposing it entirely. This is the key "swing vote" document in the migration cluster.
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 1. C accepts the Mottagandelagen framework broadly — Sweden needs a new reception framework.
 2. Area restrictions on asylum seekers are disproportionate and should be removed.
 3. Municipalities must have guaranteed emergency welfare rights when hosting reception centres (financial protection for local authorities).
 
-## Cross-Reference
+### Cross-Reference
 
 - Links to HD024095 (C: same conditional acceptance pattern on deportation law)
 - Links to `coalition-mathematics.md` §Mottagandelagen vote prediction
 - Links to `implementation-feasibility.md` — C's municipal welfare demand is noted as unlikely to be accepted
 - Links to `voter-segmentation.md` §C section — rural pragmatic liberal base
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Whether C will press its amendments to a committee vote or accept the law without amendment is uncertain. [B3]. The financial scale of C's municipal welfare demand is not costed.
 
 ### HD024090
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024090-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024090-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024090  
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
@@ -1068,34 +1049,33 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024090-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 V motion demanding rejection of the deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235) on rule-of-law grounds. V cites Lagrådet's explicit rejection of the proposition as evidence of constitutional deficiency.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 9/10. Highest-stakes motion in the migration cluster. Lagrådet citation gives it maximum institutional legitimacy for rule-of-law argument.
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 1. Lagrådet explicitly rejected prop. 2025/26:235 as "clearly ill-advised."
 2. The law targets individuals who arrived in Sweden before age 15 — ECHR Art. 8 protection is particularly strong for this group.
 3. V demands the proposition be withdrawn entirely.
 
-## Cross-Reference
+### Cross-Reference
 
 - Links to HD024095 (C: conditional acceptance — weaker stance than V's full rejection)
 - Links to `intelligence-assessment.md` KJ-2 (expert isolation of government's legislative program)
 - Links to `historical-parallels.md` §Lagrådet Rejections
 - Links to `forward-indicators.md` IND-10 (ECtHR case registration)
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Lagrådet opinion text not independently fetched — cited as reported in V's motion. [B2]. "Clearly ill-advised" quote is V's paraphrase, not the verbatim Lagrådet text.
 
 ### HD024091
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024091-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024091-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024091
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -1103,27 +1083,26 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024091-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true`.
 
 **Action required (Run 2)**: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.
 
 ### HD024092
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024092-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024092-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024092  
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
@@ -1133,33 +1112,32 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024092-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 V motion opposing the fuel tax cut element of prop. 2025/26:236. V argues the measure is distributionally regressive, citing RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158) showing that the benefit accrues disproportionately to high-income households (5:1 income-skew ratio).
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 7/10. Strong analytical foundation via RUT cite. V is positioning itself as the distributional-justice voice in the opposition.
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 1. RUT dnr 2026:158 shows the fuel tax cut benefits high-income households 5x more than low-income households.
 2. The measure is economically inefficient and regressive.
 3. V proposes rejecting the fuel tax cut and redirecting funds to targeted household support.
 
-## Cross-Reference
+### Cross-Reference
 
 - Links to HD024098 (MP agrees on rejection; V and MP aligned on outcome, not on alternative)
 - Links to `voter-segmentation.md` §V section — distributional argument targets different voter segment than S
 - Links to `devils-advocate.md` H2 — electoral vs. economic rationale
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 RUT dnr 2026:158 document not independently fetched — cited as reported in V's motion. [B2]. V's proposed alternative (targeted household support) is not costed in the motion.
 
 ### HD024095
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024095-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024095-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024095  
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
@@ -1169,34 +1147,33 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024095-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 C motion on the deportation law. Unlike V (HD024090), C does not demand full rejection — instead accepts the framework conditionally, demanding that deportation orders include adequate procedural safeguards and proportionality assessment.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 7/10. C's conditional acceptance is politically consequential — it means C will likely vote for the law despite reservations, giving the government a margin of safety beyond its bare 176 majority.
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 1. The deportation framework has legitimacy — Sweden must be able to deport criminals.
 2. Individual cases must receive proportionality assessment (balancing Article 8 ECHR rights).
 3. C does not endorse V/MP's full rejection.
 
-## Cross-Reference
+### Cross-Reference
 
 - Links to HD024090 (V: full rejection — starkly different from C's position)
 - Links to HD024089 (C: parallel conditional-acceptance pattern on Mottagandelag)
 - Links to `coalition-mathematics.md` — C's vote behaviour is the key swing variable
 - Links to `voter-segmentation.md` §C section
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Whether C's amendment demands will be adopted by SfU committee is uncertain. If adopted (unlikely given government majority), this becomes a signal of coalition complexity. [B3]
 
 ### HD024096
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024096-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024096-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024096  
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
@@ -1206,34 +1183,33 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024096-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 MP motion demanding an arms export ban to dictatorships and opposing new secrecy provisions in the arms export control framework. This motion is separate from the budget and migration clusters.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 4/10. Arms export policy is important but less electorally salient than budget and migration in the current cycle.
 
-## Key Claims (from metadata and title)
+### Key Claims (from metadata and title)
 
 1. MP demands a ban on arms exports to authoritarian states.
 2. MP opposes new secrecy provisions that would reduce parliamentary oversight of arms exports.
 3. This motion continues MP's longstanding foreign policy profile on arms control.
 
-## Cross-Reference
+### Cross-Reference
 
 - Links to `comparative-international.md` — Sweden's arms export policy is under European scrutiny
 - Links to `forward-indicators.md` IND-09 (arms export policy development)
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched — analysis based on title and metadata only. [C3]. The specific secrecy provisions being opposed are not detailed in available data. This is a significant evidence gap.
 
 **Note**: This document should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 if full text is fetched.
 
 ### HD024097
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024097-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024097-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024097
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -1241,27 +1217,26 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024097-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true`.
 
 **Action required (Run 2)**: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.
 
 ### HD024098
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024098-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024098-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024098  
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-23  
@@ -1271,37 +1246,36 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024098-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 
 ---
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 MP motion opposing the fuel tax cut, citing five expert agencies: Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet, and Trafikverket. MP argues the measure undermines climate targets and contradicts expert advice.
 
-## Political Significance
+### Political Significance
 
 **DIW**: 7/10. Five-agency citation gives this motion unusually strong expert legitimacy. MP is positioning as the "expert-aligned" voice.
 
-## Key Claims
+### Key Claims
 
 1. Five named government agencies opposed the measure in remiss.
 2. The fuel tax cut contradicts Sweden's climate commitments and 2030 targets.
 3. MP endorses the V position (reject cut) and adds a climate reinvestment requirement.
 
-## Cross-Reference
+### Cross-Reference
 
 - Links to HD024092 (V: same rejection; MP endorses V's distributional argument and adds climate dimension)
 - Links to `methodology-reflection.md` — agency documents not independently fetched
 - Links to `comparative-international.md` — Norway and Germany have similar expert-vs-government tensions on energy taxation
 
-## Outstanding Uncertainty
+### Outstanding Uncertainty
 
 The five agency remiss documents are not independently fetched — cited as reported in MP's motion. [B2]. MP's threshold risk (currently near 4%) means this motion may be the party's last major pre-election policy statement.
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Seat-Projection Deltas (as of April 2026)
+### Seat-Projection Deltas (as of April 2026)
 
 Based on recent opinion polling patterns (no specific poll cited — structural assessment):
 
@@ -1320,9 +1294,9 @@ Based on recent opinion polling patterns (no specific poll cited — structural
 
 ---
 
-## Coalition Viability Post-2026
+### Coalition Viability Post-2026
 
-### Current (Tidö) coalition logic
+#### Current (Tidö) coalition logic
 
 The motions confirm the current alignment: M + SD + KD + L govern; C is a partial ally. Opposition (S + V + MP) is fragmented. For a 2026 government change:
 
@@ -1332,7 +1306,7 @@ The motions confirm the current alignment: M + SD + KD + L govern; C is a partia
 
 ---
 
-## This Week's Motion Impact on 2026 Electoral Positioning
+### This Week's Motion Impact on 2026 Electoral Positioning
 
 | Party | Motion impact on 2026 positioning |
 |-------|----------------------------------|
@@ -1344,7 +1318,7 @@ The motions confirm the current alignment: M + SD + KD + L govern; C is a partia
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Coalition Mathematics Snapshot
+### Mermaid: Coalition Mathematics Snapshot
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
@@ -1362,12 +1336,11 @@ pie title Current Parliament Approximate Seat Distribution
 *Seat counts based on 2022 election results — 349 total seats. Government coalition (M+SD+KD+L) = 176; Opposition (S+V+MP) = 145; C = 24 pivotal. Sources: riksdagen.se official data [A1]*
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 2022 Election Seat Allocation (official, riksdagen.se)
+### 2022 Election Seat Allocation (official, riksdagen.se)
 
 | Party | Seats | Bloc |
 |-------|-------|------|
@@ -1389,7 +1362,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## This Week's Motions: Predicted Vote Outcomes
+### This Week's Motions: Predicted Vote Outcomes
 
 | Proposition | Ja (expect) | Nej (expect) | Avstår | Outcome |
 |------------|-------------|--------------|--------|---------|
@@ -1402,7 +1375,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Governing Majority Sensitivity Analysis
+### Governing Majority Sensitivity Analysis
 
 | Scenario | Government seats | Margin | Stable? |
 |---------|-----------------|--------|---------|
@@ -1415,7 +1388,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Vote Prediction for prop. 2025/26:236
+### Mermaid: Vote Prediction for prop. 2025/26:236
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "pie1": "#00d9ff", "pie2": "#ff006e", "pie3": "#ffbe0b"}}}%%
@@ -1426,14 +1399,13 @@ pie title Predicted Vote: prop 2025/26:236 (Fuel Tax)
 ```
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Target Voter Segments by Party (this week's motions)
+### Target Voter Segments by Party (this week's motions)
 
-### S — Socialdemokraterna (HD024082)
+#### S — Socialdemokraterna (HD024082)
 
 **Primary target**: Cooperative housing residents (*bostadsrättsinnehavare*) — approximately 800,000 households who were excluded from the electricity support scheme by a design flaw in prop. 2025/26:236. These are primarily urban and suburban middle-income households, core S electoral territory that drifted toward M/SD in 2022.
 
@@ -1441,7 +1413,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-### V — Vänsterpartiet (HD024092)
+#### V — Vänsterpartiet (HD024092)
 
 **Primary target**: Low-income workers and renters in car-dependent areas who spend a disproportionate share of income on fuel. V's motion cites RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158) showing that the fuel tax cut skews 5:1 toward higher-income households — the inverse of V's target segment.
 
@@ -1449,7 +1421,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-### MP — Miljöpartiet (HD024098)
+#### MP — Miljöpartiet (HD024098)
 
 **Primary target**: Climate-concerned voters, primarily urban, highly educated, who frame energy pricing as a climate tool. MP's motion's five-agency citation strategy appeals to voters who trust scientific and bureaucratic expertise.
 
@@ -1457,7 +1429,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-### C — Centerpartiet (HD024089, HD024095)
+#### C — Centerpartiet (HD024089, HD024095)
 
 **Primary target**: Rural and small-town voters with pragmatic liberal instincts. C's moderate positioning on migration (accepting the framework, opposing extreme elements) and absence of opposition on energy reflect a rural electorate that is culturally conservative but economically pragmatic.
 
@@ -1465,7 +1437,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 ---
 
-## Segment Map
+### Segment Map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
@@ -1488,20 +1460,19 @@ quadrantChart
 *Assessment confidence: MEDIUM [C3]. Quadrant placement is structural inference from motion content, not polling data.*
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator Set
+### Comparator Set
 - **Primary**: Norway (Nordic welfare state comparator), Germany (EU arms export + energy policy)  
 - **Secondary**: Denmark (migration/reception policy), Netherlands (deportation reform)
 
 ---
 
-## Comparator Analysis
+### Comparator Analysis
 
-### Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy
+#### Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy
 
 | Dimension | Sweden (2026) | Norway | Germany | Assessment |
 |-----------|--------------|--------|---------|------------|
@@ -1513,7 +1484,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-### Issue 2: Deportation of Foreign Nationals
+#### Issue 2: Deportation of Foreign Nationals
 
 | Dimension | Sweden (prop. 2025/26:235) | Denmark | Netherlands |
 |-----------|---------------------------|---------|-------------|
@@ -1526,7 +1497,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-### Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation
+#### Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation
 
 | Dimension | Sweden (prop. 2025/26:228) | Germany | Netherlands |
 |-----------|---------------------------|---------|-------------|
@@ -1540,7 +1511,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Policy Position Comparison
+### Mermaid: Policy Position Comparison
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
@@ -1555,12 +1526,11 @@ xychart-beta
 *Sources: riksdagen.se (primary documents) + ECHR case law (general knowledge baseline). Admiralty [B2].*
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 1: 2002–2006 — Opposition Fragmentation Before Bloc Politics
+### Parallel 1: 2002–2006 — Opposition Fragmentation Before Bloc Politics
 
 **Context**: Before the "Alliansen" coalition was formalized in 2004–2006, the centre-right parties (M, C, L, KD) often filed competing motions on the same government propositions, offering incompatible alternatives. This fragmentation allowed the Social Democratic government to portray the opposition as ungovernable.
 
@@ -1572,7 +1542,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 2: 2014 "Decemberöverenskommelsen" — Managing a Thin Majority
+### Parallel 2: 2014 "Decemberöverenskommelsen" — Managing a Thin Majority
 
 **Context**: In December 2014, after the 2014 election produced no clear majority, the Decemberöverenskommelse (the "December agreement") between the red-green government and the Alliance created a norm that a minority government should be allowed to govern via its own budget.
 
@@ -1582,7 +1552,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Parallel 3: Lagrådet Rejections — Historical Pattern
+### Parallel 3: Lagrådet Rejections — Historical Pattern
 
 **Context**: Lagrådet's rejection of prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law) continues a pattern of Lagrådet expressing serious concern about migration-related legislation. Similar concerns were raised about prop. 2021/22:131 (on residence permits) and prop. 2015/16:174 (temporary asylum restrictions).
 
@@ -1592,7 +1562,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Historical Timeline
+### Mermaid: Historical Timeline
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark"}}%%
@@ -1607,12 +1577,11 @@ timeline
 ```
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:236 (Supplementary Budget)
+### Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:236 (Supplementary Budget)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Evidence |
 |-----------|-----------|---------|
@@ -1625,7 +1594,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:235 (Deportation Law)
+### Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:235 (Deportation Law)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Evidence |
 |-----------|-----------|---------|
@@ -1636,7 +1605,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Feasibility Assessment: Mottagandelagen (new reception law)
+### Feasibility Assessment: Mottagandelagen (new reception law)
 
 | Dimension | Assessment | Evidence |
 |-----------|-----------|---------|
@@ -1646,7 +1615,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 ---
 
-## Opposition's Counterfactual Feasibility
+### Opposition's Counterfactual Feasibility
 
 If the opposition's alternative budget were implemented:
 - **S's design fix (HD024082)**: Technically straightforward — would require extending support mechanism to cooperative housing associations. Net cost: estimated 500 MSEK–1.5 GSEK (not costed in motion — gap noted [C3]).
@@ -1656,14 +1625,13 @@ If the opposition's alternative budget were implemented:
 *Cost assessment confidence: LOW [C3] — no official costing document available for opposition alternatives.*
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses
+### ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses
 
-### Hypothesis H1: Opposition Fragmentation is Strategic, Not Accidental
+#### Hypothesis H1: Opposition Fragmentation is Strategic, Not Accidental
 
 **Claim**: S, V, and MP filed separate budget motions (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) deliberately to address different voter segments — S targets cooperative housing residents, V targets low-income workers, MP targets climate voters. This is coordinated differentiation, not genuine disagreement.
 
@@ -1681,7 +1649,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-### Hypothesis H2: Government's Fuel Tax Cut is Primarily Electoral, Not Economic
+#### Hypothesis H2: Government's Fuel Tax Cut is Primarily Electoral, Not Economic
 
 **Claim**: The fuel tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) has no credible economic rationale (Konjunkturinstitutet says it won't solve household budget pressure effectively) and is primarily designed to generate a pre-election "relief" narrative, with SD and suburban car-dependent voters as the target.
 
@@ -1700,7 +1668,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-### Hypothesis H3: Lagrådet Rejection of Deportation Law Will Have No Lasting Effect
+#### Hypothesis H3: Lagrådet Rejection of Deportation Law Will Have No Lasting Effect
 
 **Claim**: Despite Lagrådet's explicit rejection of prop. 2025/26:235, the law will pass, be implemented, and face no successful constitutional challenge — Lagrådet opinions are advisory, not binding, and courts rarely strike down parliamentary legislation.
 
@@ -1718,24 +1686,23 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 ---
 
-## Red-Team Challenge
+### Red-Team Challenge
 
 **Weakest point in the opposition's overall strategy**: The opposition's biggest vulnerability is that the government can credibly claim to be "doing something" about energy prices and migration — two of the top 2–3 voter concerns. The opposition offers better design and rule-of-law arguments, but these are process arguments, not outcome arguments. Voters who pay high energy bills do not primarily care about distributional efficiency — they care about relief. The opposition is winning the technocratic argument while losing the emotional one.
 
 ---
 
-## Rejected Alternatives
+### Rejected Alternatives
 
 - **Hypothesis R1: SD will vote against the fuel tax cut** — Rejected. SD's electoral base in car-dependent peripheral Sweden makes opposing a fuel tax cut politically impossible. [B1]
 - **Hypothesis R2: S and V will file a joint motion** — Rejected. The documentary record shows three separate motions with no joint sponsor. The distributional framing (V's RUT citation) and design-quality framing (S) are politically incompatible. [B1]
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## 7-Dimension Classification
+### 7-Dimension Classification
 
 | Dimension | HD024082 (S) | HD024092 (V) | HD024090 (V) | HD024096 (MP) | HD024089 (C) |
 |-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|-------------|
@@ -1749,13 +1716,13 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 ---
 
-## Document Access Classification
+### Document Access Classification
 
 All documents are publicly available under Offentlighetsprincipen (Swedish freedom of information law). No special handling required. GDPR Art. 9 special categories (political opinion) apply but are publicly made per Art. 9(2)(e).
 
 ---
 
-## Retention Guidelines
+### Retention Guidelines
 
 - Analysis files: Retain for 24 months (electoral cycle documentation)
 - Raw MCP data: 12 months
@@ -1763,7 +1730,7 @@ All documents are publicly available under Offentlighetsprincipen (Swedish freed
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Policy Domain Distribution
+### Mermaid: Policy Domain Distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
@@ -1778,14 +1745,13 @@ pie title Policy Domain Distribution — 2026-04-23 Motions
 *Based on 14 analysed motions. Sources: riksdagen.se official document metadata [A1]*
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Policy Clusters
+### Policy Clusters
 
-### Cluster 1: Extra Ändringsbudget för 2026 (FiU)
+#### Cluster 1: Extra Ändringsbudget för 2026 (FiU)
 
 - **Primary proposition**: prop. 2025/26:236
 - **Motions**: HD024082 (S), HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP)
@@ -1793,7 +1759,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 - **Linked files**: risk-assessment.md §R-02, swot-analysis.md §Strengths, election-2026-analysis.md §Budget dimension
 - **External cross-references**: RUT analysis dnr 2026:158 (cited in HD024092); 5 agency remiss responses (cited in HD024098)
 
-### Cluster 2: Utvisning på grund av brott (SfU)
+#### Cluster 2: Utvisning på grund av brott (SfU)
 
 - **Primary proposition**: prop. 2025/26:235 / SOU 2025:54
 - **Motions**: HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)
@@ -1801,7 +1767,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 - **Linked files**: threat-analysis.md §T-3, stakeholder-perspectives.md §Civil Society, historical-parallels.md
 - **Cross-reference**: HD024090 cites prop. 2021/22:224 (2022 reform) as context for why another reform is premature
 
-### Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)
+#### Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)
 
 - **Primary proposition**: prop. 2025/26:228
 - **Motions**: HD024096 (MP), HD024091 (V)
@@ -1809,7 +1775,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 - **Linked files**: comparative-international.md (EU arms export regime comparison), threat-analysis.md §T-3
 - **Cross-reference**: HD024096 cites Lagrådet criticism of secrecy provisions
 
-### Cluster 4: Mottagandelag + Bosättning (SfU / AU)
+#### Cluster 4: Mottagandelag + Bosättning (SfU / AU)
 
 - **Primary propositions**: prop. 2025/26:229 (Mottagandelag), prop. 2025/26:215 (Bosättning)
 - **Motions**: HD024089, HD024087, HD024080 (Mottagandelag); HD024079, HD024077, HD024086 (Bosättning)
@@ -1818,7 +1784,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Coordinated Activity Patterns
+### Coordinated Activity Patterns
 
 - **No joint motions**: Despite opposing the same propositions, S/V/MP filed separate motions against prop. 2025/26:236 — a coordination failure.
 - **C as partial government ally**: C supported the migration reform framework (HD024089) while opposing specific provisions — diverges from typical opposition coalition.
@@ -1826,7 +1792,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 
 ---
 
-## Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network
+### Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
@@ -1854,47 +1820,46 @@ graph LR
 ```
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## § ICD 203 Audit
+### § ICD 203 Audit
 
-### Standard 1: Objectivity
+#### Standard 1: Objectivity
 - Maintained: Analysis covers S, V, MP, C motions with equal depth. No party's arguments are dismissed without evidence.
 - Limitation: Government's counter-arguments are inferred from proposition text, not from direct government motion analysis. This is a structural limitation of the opposition-motions workflow.
 
-### Standard 2: Independence
+#### Standard 2: Independence
 - Maintained: No partisan communication influenced the analysis. Sources are all publicly available via riksdagen.se.
 
-### Standard 3: Timeliness
+#### Standard 3: Timeliness
 - Maintained: Motions dated 2026-04-13–17; analysis produced 2026-04-23. Lag: 6–10 days. Acceptable for strategic analysis; not suitable for breaking news.
 
-### Standard 4: Sourcing and Provenance
+#### Standard 4: Sourcing and Provenance
 - **Strength**: Core claims all cite dok_ids (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024095, HD024096, HD024098, HD024089). External sources (RUT dnr 2026:158, five agencies) are cited as reported in the motions rather than independently verified.
 - **Gap**: RUT dnr 2026:158 and specific agency remiss documents were not independently fetched. Confidence in those specific figures is therefore [B2] rather than [A1].
 - **Action required (Run 2)**: If agency remiss documents are fetched directly, confidence in distributional claims could be upgraded to [A1–A2].
 
-### Standard 5: Uncertainty
+#### Standard 5: Uncertainty
 - Maintained: Confidence levels applied throughout. WEP language (Likely, Very likely, etc.) used consistently. Coalition scenarios assigned probability bands.
 
-### Standard 6: Consistency
+#### Standard 6: Consistency
 - Maintained: The lead narrative (opposition fragmentation as key story) is consistent across executive-brief, synthesis-summary, intelligence-assessment, and scenario-analysis.
 
-### Standard 7: Completeness
+#### Standard 7: Completeness
 - **Gap**: Arms export motion (HD024096) received less analytical depth than budget and migration motions. Jacob Risberg's full text was not fetched. The secrecy provisions element is underanalysed.
 - **Mitigation**: Arms export was identified as significance rank 4 of 4 clusters — lower priority is analytically justified.
 
-### Standard 8: Accuracy
+#### Standard 8: Accuracy
 - Maintained: Seat counts (349 total, exact per-party figures) sourced from official riksdagen.se election data [A1]. All dok_ids verified against manifest.
 
-### Standard 9: Appropriate Use of Analogies
+#### Standard 9: Appropriate Use of Analogies
 - Historical parallels (2002–2006 opposition fragmentation, Decemberöverenskommelsen, Lagrådet rejection pattern) are structural analogies, not direct precedent. Limitations noted in `historical-parallels.md`.
 
 ---
 
-## SAT Catalog — Structured Analytic Techniques Used
+### SAT Catalog — Structured Analytic Techniques Used
 
 | Technique | Where used | Quality assessment |
 |-----------|-----------|-------------------|
@@ -1914,10 +1879,9 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 ---
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md)_
-
-## Workflow Metadata
+### Workflow Metadata
 - **Workflow**: news-motions
 - **Run date**: 2026-04-23T07:16:27Z
 - **Article date**: 2026-04-23
@@ -1926,7 +1890,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **MCP status**: riksdag-regering LIVE (generated_at: 2026-04-23T07:16:36Z)
 - **Analysis subfolder**: analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/
 
-## Downloaded Documents
+### Downloaded Documents
 
 | dok_id | Title | Type | Date | Committee | Submitter | Full-text | DIW tier |
 |--------|-------|------|------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----------|
@@ -1945,14 +1909,55 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD024077 | Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända | mot | 2026-04-14 | AU | Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) | Metadata | L1 Surface |
 | HD024086 | Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända | mot | 2026-04-15 | AU | Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) | Metadata | L1 Surface |
 
-## Policy Clusters Identified
+### Policy Clusters Identified
 
 1. **Fiscal / Energy cluster**: HD024082, HD024092, HD024098 — Extra ändringsbudget, bränslesskatt, elstöd
 2. **Migration / Crime nexus cluster**: HD024090, HD024095, HD024097 — Utvisning på grund av brott
 3. **Arms exports cluster**: HD024096, HD024091 — Krigsmateriel regulation
 4. **Asylum reception cluster**: HD024089, HD024087, HD024080, HD024079, HD024077, HD024086 — Mottagandelag, bosättning
 
-## MCP Server Notes
+### MCP Server Notes
 - riksdag-regering: All requests successful, no retries required
 - Total motions in 2025/26 riksmöte: 4,098 (as of 2026-04-23)
 - Retrieval timestamp: 2026-04-23T07:18:00Z
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024077-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024079-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024080-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024086-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024087-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024089-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024090-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024091-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024092-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024095-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024096-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024097-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024098-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/article.md
index 682dce1519..f7c9c95db5 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-24
 subfolder: committeeReports
 slug: 2026-04-24-committeeReports
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.929Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.727Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,20 +26,19 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's three pre-election signature pillars — **criminal-justice capacity** (`HD01CU25`), **migration enforcement with a research-mobility carve-out** (`HD01SfU23`), and **monetary-institutional stewardship** (`HD01FiU23`) — supplemented by two broad-consensus dossiers on **ILO labour-rights ratification** (`HD01AU15`) and **EV home-charging** (`HD01CU29`). The cluster is a deliberate signalling composition ~5 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election: it lets M/KD/SD claim delivery on law-and-order and migration while L and centrist actors anchor EU-compatible labour and climate wins. Real implementation risk concentrates in `HD01CU25` (Kriminalvården capacity absorption) and `HD01SfU23` (Migrationsverket case-handling bifurcation); reputational risk concentrates in `HD01FiU23` (Riksbank balance-sheet losses and independence narratives).
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Election-cycle messaging** — Government communicators should sequence CU25 (law-and-order) + SfU23 (migration) floor speeches together during May 2026 to maximise pre-recess coverage; opposition should counter-frame SfU23 on researcher-mobility carve-out to split M from L and avoid S being boxed in as anti-research.
 2. **Implementation oversight** — KU and Riksrevisionen should pre-flag CU25 (procurement/environmental shortcut exposure) and SfU23 (Migrationsverket dual-track IT and staffing) for 2026/27 audit scope; FiU23 confirms standing Riksbank independence review cadence.
 3. **International positioning** — Ratification of ILO C190 (AU15) should be paired in government talking points with EU Platform Work Directive transposition and Nordic counterparts' earlier ratifications (Denmark, Finland, Norway) to maximise reputational dividend.
 
-## ⏱ 60-second read
+### ⏱ 60-second read
 
 - **Lead story**: `HD01CU25` — the prison-capacity expansion bill is the highest-weighted item (DIW 85) because it combines large fiscal exposure (Kriminalvården expansion programme), compressed timelines, and pre-election symbolism. See `synthesis-summary.md` and `risk-assessment.md §Institutional`.
 - **Second line**: `HD01SfU23` (DIW 80) bifurcates migration policy — tightening on study permits while opening for researchers — creating both coalition-internal tension (SD–L) and an Opposition opening on competitiveness framing. See `stakeholder-perspectives.md` and `devils-advocate.md H3`.
@@ -47,11 +46,11 @@ Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's thr
 - **Consensus items**: `HD01AU15` (ILO, DIW 72) and `HD01CU29` (EV charging, DIW 58) are broad-support dossiers that provide bipartisan cover for the government to claim delivery width.
 - **Top forward trigger**: watch the **Kriminalvården 2026 Q2 capacity status report** (expected +60 days, ~2026-06-23). A deviation ≥ 10 % from planned bed count would falsify the CU25 timeline and invert the government's crime-delivery narrative into the election. See `forward-indicators.md`.
 
-## 🧠 Confidence & assumptions
+### 🧠 Confidence & assumptions
 
 Key Judgments carry **HIGH** confidence on cluster composition and DIW ranking (based on primary `get_dokument` metadata, consistent with Riksdag committee calendar). **MEDIUM** confidence on implementation deltas (dependent on 2026 Q2 status reports not yet published). **LOW** confidence on voter-level framing effects pending 2026 Q3 polling waves. See `intelligence-assessment.md §Key Assumptions Check` and `methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 audit`.
 
-## 📊 Composition diagram
+### 📊 Composition diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -78,7 +77,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style L fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument({dok_id: "HD01CU25"})` → https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25 [A1]
 - `get_dokument({dok_id: "HD01SfU23"})` → https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23 [A1]
@@ -89,14 +88,13 @@ flowchart LR
 - See `intelligence-assessment.md` for full judgement-level source mapping.
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md)_
-
-## Lead story / decision
+### Lead story / decision
 
 The dominant signal in today's five-report cluster is a **cross-committee signalling composition** rather than any single blockbuster bill. The Tidö coalition (M, KD, L, SD supply) has staged its two politically hottest pillars — **prison-capacity expansion** (`HD01CU25`) and **migration tightening with a research carve-out** (`HD01SfU23`) — alongside an **institutional-stewardship** report (`HD01FiU23`, Riksbank 2025) and two **consensus dossiers** (`HD01AU15` ILO, `HD01CU29` EV charging) that provide breadth cover. This pattern — concentrating signature items in a single tabling window ~5 months before the **September 2026 Riksdag election** ([riksdagen.se election calendar](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/sa-fungerar-riksdagen/riksdagens-uppgifter/val/) [A1]) — is strategically rational for the government but creates **three concentrated implementation risks** (CU25 procurement, SfU23 Migrationsverket IT, FiU23 balance-sheet narrative) that any of them materialising would damage delivery credibility simultaneously.
 
-## DIW-weighted ranking
+### DIW-weighted ranking
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -115,79 +113,78 @@ flowchart TD
 
 See `significance-scoring.md` for per-item DIW decomposition.
 
-## Integrated intelligence picture
+### Integrated intelligence picture
 
-### 1. Pre-election signalling cluster (CU25 + SfU23 + FiU23)
+#### 1. Pre-election signalling cluster (CU25 + SfU23 + FiU23)
 
 The three high-DIW items (CU25, SfU23, FiU23 — `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`) are **not coincidentally tabled together**. The Civilutskottet CU channel is being used unusually heavily for penal policy (CU25) alongside its standard housing/family-law remit, reflecting the government's decision to route capacity-expansion legislation through CU rather than JuU to accelerate planning-law carve-outs. SfU23 follows the 2024–25 migration tightening trajectory (see `historical-parallels.md §2024-SfU trajectory`) while opening a researcher carve-out that L and C can defend. FiU23 is the annual Riksbank review ([riksdagen.se/utskott/finansutskottet](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/finansutskottet/) [A1]), unusually salient in 2026 because the Riksbank booked balance-sheet losses in 2023–24 that the recapitalisation statute addresses.
 
-### 2. Consensus-breadth cluster (AU15 + CU29)
+#### 2. Consensus-breadth cluster (AU15 + CU29)
 
 `HD01AU15` (ILO C190 on workplace violence/harassment + C155/C187 occupational safety) and `HD01CU29` (EV home-charging) serve as **narrative-breadth** items. AU15 signals EU-compatible, ILO-aligned labour rights (Denmark ratified C190 in 2022, Finland 2023, Norway 2023 — see `comparative-international.md`); CU29 signals climate-mobility delivery. Both are expected to attract broad-party support and give the government cover to claim width on workers' rights and climate alongside the harder CU25/SfU23 signals.
 
-### 3. Coalition-internal tensions
+#### 3. Coalition-internal tensions
 
 SfU23 is the most likely intra-coalition friction point: SD will push maximalist framing on permit-abuse; L will defend researcher mobility; M/KD balance. CU25 will see S split — labour-union tradition vs. law-and-order triangulation — with V/MP opposing on environmental-carve-out grounds. FiU23 will see V/MP raise Riksbank mandate/ESG questions while M/L defend independence. See `devils-advocate.md §H2`.
 
-### 4. Post-election implementation cliff
+#### 4. Post-election implementation cliff
 
 All five items will clear chamber in 2026 before dissolution, but **execution lands with whichever government forms after September 2026**. CU25's Kriminalvården capacity timeline extends into 2027–2030 (see `forward-indicators.md`); SfU23's Migrationsverket IT build extends into 2027. A government transition ↔ delivery handover mismatch is the cluster's single largest cascading risk. See `risk-assessment.md §Institutional`.
 
-## AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 - **Suggested headline (EN)**: "Riksdag Committee Reports Stack Tidö Pre-Election Pillars: Prisons, Migration, Riksbank"
 - **Suggested headline (SV)**: "Tidöpartierna staplar sina valsignaler: fängelser, migration och Riksbank i utskottsvågen"
 - **Meta description**: "Five committee reports tabled 23 April cluster Tidö's law-and-order, migration and monetary-stewardship signals five months before the September 2026 election."
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument` calls on HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29 [A1]
 - riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/ [A1]
 - regeringen.se — Tidöavtalet reference context [A2]
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling   **Audience**: analyst-desk, newsroom, KU oversight interests.
 **Standards**: ICD 203 (analytic standards); WEP / Kent confidence scale; Admiralty Code on all source citations.
 **Base date**: 2026-04-24.
 
-## Bottom Line Up Front
+### Bottom Line Up Front
 
 Tidö has staged its pre-election committee-report cluster with three signature items (CU25 prison capacity, SfU23 migration/researchers, FiU23 Riksbank 2025) and two consensus items (AU15 ILO, CU29 EV charging). Delivery credibility over the next 60–120 days — dominated by the Kriminalvården Q2 capacity report and Migrationsverket dual-track IT milestone — will determine whether this cluster becomes a 2026 campaign asset (~40 % likelihood) or a narrative liability (~40 % combined S2 + S3 likelihood).
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### KJ-1 — The five-report cluster is strategically composed, not calendar-driven (**HIGH** confidence, B2)
+#### KJ-1 — The five-report cluster is strategically composed, not calendar-driven (**HIGH** confidence, B2)
 
 We assess with **HIGH** confidence that the composition reflects coordinated signalling and coalition-internal horse-trading (H1 + H4 in `devils-advocate.md`). Evidence: simultaneous tabling across 4 committees with 3 signature items; coalition-internal balance visible in SfU23 carve-out structure; Tidö April 2026 delivery-ledger communications pattern. Analytic technique: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — 1 inconsistency against mainline H1, 0 against H4. Confidence rated HIGH because coordination is structurally visible; the residual 20 % accounts for partial contribution from calendar mechanics (H2). Primary source: `get_dokument` × 5 [A1].
 
-### KJ-2 — CU25 (prison capacity) is the single highest-weight item and highest-risk delivery exposure (**HIGH** confidence, B2)
+#### KJ-2 — CU25 (prison capacity) is the single highest-weight item and highest-risk delivery exposure (**HIGH** confidence, B2)
 
 DIW 85 (bounded 78–88) reflects convergence of electoral salience (95), fiscal/regulatory impact (90), and precedent value (80 — planning-law carve-outs). Implementation risk concentrates on Kriminalvården capacity absorption and procurement; probability of ≥ 10 % timeline slippage at 55 % posterior (Bayesian update from 2020/2023 capacity-plan miss base rate). Primary source: `HD01CU25` + [kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/) [A2].
 
-### KJ-3 — SfU23 is the single most coalition-internally stressed item (**MEDIUM** confidence, C3)
+#### KJ-3 — SfU23 is the single most coalition-internally stressed item (**MEDIUM** confidence, C3)
 
 DIW 80 with coalition-stress sub-score 85 — the highest on the cluster table. Tension is between SD maximalist framing of abuse-prevention and L defence of researcher carve-out; M/KD balance. We assess **MEDIUM** confidence that visible L position-paper defence will emerge pre-summer recess; L defection on floor vote is **LOW** (< 20 %) because carve-out structure accommodates L preference. Primary source: `HD01SfU23` + L party published positions [B3].
 
-### KJ-4 — FiU23 (Riksbank 2025) is standing annual review but unusually salient given 2024–25 balance-sheet narrative (**HIGH** confidence, A2)
+#### KJ-4 — FiU23 (Riksbank 2025) is standing annual review but unusually salient given 2024–25 balance-sheet narrative (**HIGH** confidence, A2)
 
 Probability (~ 45 %) that Riksbank recapitalisation becomes a 2026 chamber-floor debate rather than a contained standing-review item. Indicator: FiU scheduling a separate recapitalisation hearing. Primary source: `HD01FiU23` + [riksbank.se](https://www.riksbank.se/) annual reports [A1].
 
-### KJ-5 — AU15 + CU29 function as breadth cover, producing low-probability but non-trivial reputational dividend potential (**MEDIUM** confidence, C3)
+#### KJ-5 — AU15 + CU29 function as breadth cover, producing low-probability but non-trivial reputational dividend potential (**MEDIUM** confidence, C3)
 
 Scenario 5 ("broad-consensus windfall") sits at 8 %. Principal mechanism: pairing C190 ratification with EU Platform Work Directive transposition for Nordic / EU media. Primary source: `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` + ILO ratification dates [A1].
 
-### KJ-6 — The cluster's cascading-risk exposure is larger than any single item (**MEDIUM** confidence, C3)
+#### KJ-6 — The cluster's cascading-risk exposure is larger than any single item (**MEDIUM** confidence, C3)
 
 Joint probability of ≥ 1 delivery failure (R1, R3, R5, R10 in `risk-assessment.md`) within Q3 2026 is ~ 70 %; joint probability of ≥ 2 is ~ 40 %. A combined CU25 timeline slip + SfU23 judicial/IT cascade + FiU23 recapitalisation debate is the low-probability (< 10 %) but high-impact worst case. Primary source: Bayesian update on 2022–24 base rates [B2].
 
-### KJ-7 — Sweden's late ratification of ILO C190 is framing-rather-than-substance disadvantage (**HIGH** confidence, A1)
+#### KJ-7 — Sweden's late ratification of ILO C190 is framing-rather-than-substance disadvantage (**HIGH** confidence, A1)
 
 Denmark (2022), Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands ratified before Sweden. Substantive reason: legal compatibility work in Diskrimineringslagen + Arbetsmiljölagen. `HD01AU15` completes Nordic parity with a measurable lag that opposition actors may frame as stewardship deficit. Primary source: [ilo.org NORMLEX](https://www.ilo.org/) [A1].
 
-## Key Assumptions Check
+### Key Assumptions Check
 
 | # | Assumption | Source | If wrong | Action |
 |:-:|-----------|--------|----------|--------|
@@ -197,7 +194,7 @@ Denmark (2022), Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands ratified before Sweden. Su
 | A4 | Kriminalvården 2026 capacity plan remains as published | [kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/) | Revised plan invalidates CU25 baseline | Re-run KJ-2 |
 | A5 | No EU directive change altering AU15 ratification landscape | [eur-lex.europa.eu](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/) | EU change would re-frame KJ-7 | Re-run comparative analysis |
 
-## Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs for next cycle)
+### Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs for next cycle)
 
 - **PIR-1** (CU25): Kriminalvården Q2 2026 capacity status — target date ~ 2026-06-23; detection: report publication at [kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/).
 - **PIR-2** (SfU23): any Migrationsöverdomstolen prövningstillstånd on SfU23 test case — rolling; detection: [domstol.se](https://www.domstol.se/) press releases.
@@ -207,7 +204,7 @@ Denmark (2022), Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands ratified before Sweden. Su
 - **PIR-6** (CU25 politics): L party position-paper releases on CU25 / SfU23 — detection: [liberalerna.se](https://www.liberalerna.se/).
 - **PIR-7** (standing): any disinformation / narrative-amplification surge around CU25 slippage or SfU23 abuse framing — detection: [msb.se](https://www.msb.se/) disinformation observatory.
 
-## Confidence distribution
+### Confidence distribution
 
 - **HIGH / VERY HIGH**: KJ-1, KJ-2, KJ-4, KJ-7 (4 judgments)
 - **MEDIUM**: KJ-3, KJ-5, KJ-6 (3 judgments)
@@ -215,18 +212,17 @@ Denmark (2022), Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands ratified before Sweden. Su
 
 Ratio HIGH:MEDIUM:LOW = 4:3:0. Absence of LOW judgments is consistent with a high-information base (5 attested `dok_id` + well-documented implementing agencies) and consistent with ICD 203 discipline on confidence-to-evidence mapping — see `methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 audit`.
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 All key judgments cite at least one `get_dokument` call + one primary-source URL on data.riksdagen.se / regeringen.se / riksbank.se / ilo.org / kriminalvarden.se / migrationsverket.se / domstol.se.
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Method**: Decision-Impact Weighting (DIW) from `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §DIW`.
 **Components** (0–100 each, weighted): Stakeholder reach (20 %), Fiscal/regulatory impact (20 %), Institutional change (15 %), Electoral salience (15 %), Precedent value (10 %), Time-criticality (10 %), Coalition stress (10 %).
 
-## Ranking table
+### Ranking table
 
 | Rank | `dok_id` | Committee | Stake | Fiscal | Inst | Elect | Prec | Time | Coal | **DIW** | Tier | Source |
 |:---:|----------|:---------:|:-----:|:------:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-------:|------|--------|
@@ -236,7 +232,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | 4 | `HD01AU15` | AU | 75 | 60 | 70 | 70 | 85 | 65 | 65 | **72** | L2 | https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15 [A1] |
 | 5 | `HD01CU29` | CU | 65 | 55 | 50 | 60 | 55 | 55 | 55 | **58** | L2 | https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29 [A1] |
 
-## Ranking diagram
+### Ranking diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -257,7 +253,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style E fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sensitivity analysis
+### Sensitivity analysis
 
 - **CU25 → 85** (`HD01CU25`): bounded 78–88. If Kriminalvården publishes its Q2 2026 capacity report confirming on-track delivery (see `forward-indicators.md` +60d trigger), electoral salience stays at 95; if status slips, institutional weight rises and DIW trends to 88. Source: `HD01CU25` at [data.riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/) [A1].
 - **SfU23 → 80**: bounded 74–84. Coalition-stress sub-score (85) is the single highest on the table because SD–L friction is the modal public dispute pattern; a visible L defection (or pre-election L position-paper on research mobility) pushes DIW to 84. Source: party communications [riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1].
@@ -265,16 +261,16 @@ flowchart LR
 - **AU15 → 72** (`HD01AU15`): bounded 68–75. Stable. Precedent value (85) dominates because C190 ratification anchors future gender-equality and harassment litigation framework in Swedish labour-market model. Source: `HD01AU15` at [data.riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/) [A1].
 - **CU29 → 58**: bounded 52–62. Stable consensus item. Precedent value (55) is only moderate because home-charging regulation is incremental against the existing electricity and property legislation. Source: [regeringen.se/infrastrukturdepartementet](https://www.regeringen.se/) [A2].
 
-## Priority tier assignment
+### Priority tier assignment
 
 - **L2+ Priority** (`HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`): depth-tier L2+ per-document analysis, chart data file, stakeholder network. [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/)
 - **L2 Strategic** (`HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29`): standard L2 per-document analysis. [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/)
 
-## Evidence completeness
+### Evidence completeness
 
 All 5 rows cite a live `dok_id` resolvable via `get_dokument` + a primary-source URL on `data.riksdagen.se`. All auxiliary claims cite Kriminalvården, Riksbank, ILO, Regeringen primary URLs.
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument` × 5 (`HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29`) at [data.riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/) [A1]
 - [riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/) committee calendar (A1)
@@ -283,13 +279,12 @@ All 5 rows cite a live `dok_id` resolvable via `get_dokument` + a primary-source
 - [riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/) — ILO C190 / C155 / C187 citations for `HD01AU15` (A1)
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 **Framework**: narrative-ecosystem analysis per `osint-tradecraft-standards.md` §Strategic Communication.
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM (C3) on framing uptake.
 
-## Likely outlet-level framings
+### Likely outlet-level framings
 
 | Outlet | CU25 | SfU23 | FiU23 | AU15 | CU29 |
 |--------|------|-------|-------|------|------|
@@ -300,7 +295,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | **SVT Nyheter** | Balanced delivery + risk | Balanced tightening + carve-out | Institutional-review explainer | Positive ratification | Balanced regressivity discussion |
 | **Sveriges Radio Ekot** | Procedural + delivery detail | Institutional-balance focus | Central-bank governance | Positive | Distributive discussion |
 
-## Narrative lines to monitor
+### Narrative lines to monitor
 
 1. **"Fängelser före välfärd"** (prisons before welfare) — S/V/MP-aligned inversion of Tidö delivery claim (CU25 focus).
 2. **"Konkurrenskraft vs. kontroll"** (competitiveness vs. control) — L/C/business-oriented critique of SfU23 balance.
@@ -308,7 +303,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 4. **"Sverige sist i Norden"** (Sweden last in the Nordics) — opposition re-framing of AU15 delay.
 5. **"Elbil åt de redan rika"** (EVs for those already wealthy) — V/MP/C distributive critique of CU29.
 
-## Disinformation vulnerability assessment
+### Disinformation vulnerability assessment
 
 | Item | Vulnerability | Amplification vectors | Mitigation |
 |------|---------------|----------------------|------------|
@@ -318,7 +313,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | AU15 | LOW | — | — |
 | CU29 | MEDIUM — regressivity meme amplification | X/Twitter | [naturvardsverket.se](https://www.naturvardsverket.se/) + [energimyndigheten.se](https://www.energimyndigheten.se/) data clarity [A2] |
 
-## Framing-propagation diagram
+### Framing-propagation diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -345,20 +340,19 @@ flowchart LR
     style Pub fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` [A1]
 - Regeringskansliet communications trend ([regeringen.se](https://www.regeringen.se/)) [A2]
 - MSB disinformation observatory ([msb.se](https://www.msb.se/)) [A2]
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Framework**: 6-lens matrix from `analysis/methodologies/synthesis-methodology.md` — (1) Parties, (2) Government agencies, (3) Affected citizens / demographic groups, (4) Civil society / unions / employers, (5) Subnational government, (6) International / EU.
 **Confidence**: HIGH on party positions (A1–B2); MEDIUM on agency and civil society inference (B3–C3).
 
-## Master stakeholder table
+### Master stakeholder table
 
 | Stakeholder | CU25 | SfU23 | FiU23 | AU15 | CU29 | Dominant lens |
 |------------|:----:|:-----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|---------------|
@@ -385,24 +379,24 @@ Legend: `+++` strong support, `++` support, `+` mild support, `±` split / condi
 
 Sources: party group communications at [riksdagen.se/partierna](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]; agency mandate references at [kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/), [migrationsverket.se](https://www.migrationsverket.se/), [riksbank.se](https://www.riksbank.se/), [av.se](https://www.av.se/), [boverket.se](https://www.boverket.se/), [energimyndigheten.se](https://www.energimyndigheten.se/) [A2]; civil-society baselines at [suhf.se](https://www.suhf.se/), [lo.se](https://www.lo.se/), [svensktnaringsliv.se](https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/) [B2]; SKR baseline at [skr.se](https://www.skr.se/) [A2].
 
-## Per-document stakeholder narrative
+### Per-document stakeholder narrative
 
-### HD01CU25 — prison capacity
+#### HD01CU25 — prison capacity
 **Winners**: Kriminalvården (mandate expansion), local councils hosting new sites (employment + infrastructure), construction sector. **Losers**: local councils at risk of environmental-carve-out procedural strain; MP/V constituencies on environmental grounds. **Decisive actor**: Kriminalvården Q2 status report — sets delivery credibility. Evidence: [kriminalvarden.se/om-oss/verksamhet/anstalter-och-hakten](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/), `HD01CU25` [A2].
 
-### HD01SfU23 — migration / researchers
+#### HD01SfU23 — migration / researchers
 **Winners**: Sweden's university sector (SUHF advocacy group) on carve-out; Migrationsverket enforcement division. **Losers**: international students under abuse-prevention tightening; civil-society immigrant-rights orgs. **Decisive actor**: SUHF + individual research-university rectors (KTH, KI, Lund, Uppsala) — their position determines L defection probability. Evidence: [suhf.se](https://www.suhf.se/), `HD01SfU23` [A2/B2].
 
-### HD01FiU23 — Riksbank 2025
+#### HD01FiU23 — Riksbank 2025
 **Winners**: Riksbank General Council (standing affirmation); financial-stability interests. **Losers**: none direct; V rhetorical loss. **Decisive actor**: FiU chair — sequencing of recapitalisation hearing vs. annual review. Evidence: [riksdagen.se/finansutskottet](https://www.riksdagen.se/), `HD01FiU23` [A1].
 
-### HD01AU15 — ILO conventions
+#### HD01AU15 — ILO conventions
 **Winners**: LO/TCO/Saco (negotiating leverage); Arbetsmiljöverket/DO (mandate clarification); women and gender-minority workers (C190 scope). **Losers**: small employers on compliance-cost margin. **Decisive actor**: Arbetsmiljöverket guidance capacity. Evidence: [av.se](https://www.av.se/), [lo.se](https://www.lo.se/), `HD01AU15` [A1/B2].
 
-### HD01CU29 — EV charging
+#### HD01CU29 — EV charging
 **Winners**: homeowners with detached dwellings (primary subsidy beneficiaries); EV OEMs; Energimyndigheten. **Losers**: tenants in multi-dwelling buildings without assigned parking (design gap); grid-peak cost allocation may fall on non-EV households. **Decisive actor**: Boverket regulatory draft. Evidence: [boverket.se](https://www.boverket.se/), `HD01CU29` [A2].
 
-## Influence network
+### Influence network
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -433,19 +427,18 @@ flowchart LR
     style LO fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 See master table for per-row citations. All party positions inferred from published 2025–26 party group statements and prior-vote record at [riksdagen.se/voteringar](https://www.riksdagen.se/).
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: leading indicator register for +30 d / +60 d / +90 d / +180 d horizons.
 **Standards**: each indicator has owner, source URL, expected date, and detection signal.
 **Confidence**: HIGH (B2) on sources; MEDIUM (C3) on expected-date predictions.
 
-## Indicator register (≥ 10 dated indicators)
+### Indicator register (≥ 10 dated indicators)
 
 | # | Indicator | Horizon | Expected date | Owner/Source | Signal | PIR link |
 |:-:|-----------|:-------:|:-------------:|--------------|--------|----------|
@@ -465,7 +458,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | I14 | Opposition motion filings referencing CU25 / SfU23 | rolling | weekly to 2026-06 | [riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1] | Volume surge → framing intensification | — |
 | I15 | S/V/MP coordinated press-event windows | +30 d → +60 d | 2026-05 → 2026-06 | [socialdemokraterna.se](https://www.socialdemokraterna.se/) [B3] | Coordinated timing → campaign alignment signal | — |
 
-## Horizon-stacked diagram
+### Horizon-stacked diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -515,48 +508,47 @@ gantt
     I13 Nordic/EU coverage        :d4, 2026-05-01, 90d
 ```
 
-## Priority score
+### Priority score
 
 - **P0** (report-triggering): I1, I2, I4, I11 — directly drive scenario transitions.
 - **P1** (signal-confirming): I3, I5, I7, I10, I12 — confirm/disconfirm mainline judgments.
 - **P2** (contextual): I6, I8, I9, I13, I14, I15 — frame movement in surrounding narrative space.
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - All indicator sources cited above [A1–B3]
 - `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` [A1]
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Framework**: `analysis/methodologies/strategic-extensions-methodology.md` (Alternative futures + leading indicators).
 **Horizon**: baseline 2026-04-24 → Sep 2026 general election → 2027 H1 implementation.
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM overall (C3); HIGH on event set (B2), MEDIUM on probability weighting.
 
-## Scenario set (probabilities sum to 100 %)
+### Scenario set (probabilities sum to 100 %)
 
-### Scenario 1 — "Signature delivery locked in" (p = 40 %)
+#### Scenario 1 — "Signature delivery locked in" (p = 40 %)
 
 CU25 Kriminalvården capacity report (+60 d) confirms on-track delivery; SfU23 transposes cleanly with researcher-carve-out operational by 2026 Q3; FiU23 passes without recapitalisation drama. Tidö enters Sep 2026 election with credible delivery ledger. Leading indicator: **Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status within ± 5 % of plan** ([kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/) [A2], `HD01CU25`).
 
-### Scenario 2 — "Partial inversion on CU25" (p = 25 %)
+#### Scenario 2 — "Partial inversion on CU25" (p = 25 %)
 
 CU25 timeline slips ≥ 10 %; SfU23 and FiU23 land cleanly. Opposition weaponises delivery gap; Tidö still holds net-positive delivery narrative on migration and monetary stewardship. Leading indicator: **Kriminalvården Q2 report reveals > 10 % capacity shortfall OR Riksrevisionen audit flags procurement** ([riksrevisionen.se](https://www.riksrevisionen.se/) [A2]).
 
-### Scenario 3 — "Migration legal cascade" (p = 15 %)
+#### Scenario 3 — "Migration legal cascade" (p = 15 %)
 
 Migrationsöverdomstolen issues adverse proportionality ruling on SfU23 abuse-prevention provisions; Migrationsverket IT build slips ≥ 6 months. SfU23 becomes a liability. Leading indicator: **Domstolsväsendet prövningstillstånd on SfU23 test case OR MV transformation-programme status flagged at Digg** ([domstol.se](https://www.domstol.se/), [digg.se](https://www.digg.se/) [B2], `HD01SfU23`).
 
-### Scenario 4 — "Institutional-credibility crisis" (p = 12 %)
+#### Scenario 4 — "Institutional-credibility crisis" (p = 12 %)
 
 Riksbank recapitalisation becomes 2026 chamber-floor debate triggered by FiU23 review, dragging out into June 2026. V and MP amplify mandate questions; L and C protect independence. Leading indicator: **FiU scheduling a separate recapitalisation hearing OR Riksbank publication of extraordinary balance-sheet communication** ([riksbank.se](https://www.riksbank.se/) [A1], `HD01FiU23`).
 
-### Scenario 5 — "Broad-consensus windfall" (p = 8 %)
+#### Scenario 5 — "Broad-consensus windfall" (p = 8 %)
 
 AU15 ratification + CU29 EV-charging rollout generate unexpectedly large reputational dividends (Nordic + EU media); Tidö leverages into a L-led pre-election consensus pivot. Probability low because these are not campaign-decisive issues. Leading indicator: **Nordic Council coverage of AU15 ratification debate OR major EU climate outlet coverage of CU29 model** ([norden.org](https://www.norden.org/) [B3], `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29`).
 
-## Scenario likelihood diagram
+### Scenario likelihood diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 pie title Scenario probabilities (Sep 2026 horizon)
@@ -567,7 +559,7 @@ pie title Scenario probabilities (Sep 2026 horizon)
     "S5 Broad-consensus windfall" : 8
 ```
 
-## Branching tree
+### Branching tree
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -596,7 +588,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style E5 fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Key indicators summary
+### Key indicators summary
 
 | Scenario | Leading indicator | Source | Horizon |
 |----------|-------------------|--------|---------|
@@ -606,19 +598,18 @@ flowchart TD
 | S4 | FiU separate recap hearing scheduled | [riksdagen.se/finansutskottet](https://www.riksdagen.se/) | +30 d to +60 d |
 | S5 | Nordic Council or EU media major AU15 / CU29 coverage | [norden.org](https://www.norden.org/) | +60 d to +180 d |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 `get_dokument` × 5 at data.riksdagen.se; agency + judicial leading indicators cited above.
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Framework**: `analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md` (5 dimensions: Institutional, Operational, Fiscal, Political-reputational, Legal-compliance).
 **Method**: Likelihood (L, 1–5) × Impact (I, 1–5) → Risk score (1–25). Cascading chains + posterior probabilities via Bayesian update where prior data exists.
 **Confidence**: HIGH on top-3 risks (B2); MEDIUM on tail risks (C3).
 
-## Risk register
+### Risk register
 
 | # | Dimension | Risk | Source doc | L | I | Score | Posterior | Evidence |
 |:-:|-----------|------|-----------|:-:|:-:|:-----:|:---------:|----------|
@@ -633,7 +624,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R9 | Operational | AU15 Arbetsmiljöverket guidance gap creates employer-compliance ambiguity | `HD01AU15` | 3 | 2 | 6 | 45 % | https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15, [av.se](https://www.av.se/) [B3] |
 | R10 | Institutional | Post-2026 government change disrupts CU25 multi-year delivery commitment | `HD01CU25` | 3 | 4 | 12 | 40 % | https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25 [B2] |
 
-## Risk heat map
+### Risk heat map
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -656,9 +647,9 @@ quadrantChart
     "R10 Post-election handover": [0.55, 0.78]
 ```
 
-## Cascading chains
+### Cascading chains
 
-### Chain A: Delivery-credibility collapse
+#### Chain A: Delivery-credibility collapse
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -677,7 +668,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 Joint probability ≥ 1 R1/R3/R10 event within 2026 Q3: ~ 0.70. If joint ≥ 2 events: ~ 0.40. Source: Bayesian update on 2022–24 base rates — `kriminalvarden.se` annual reports, ESV major-project tracking.
 
-### Chain B: Migration legal–operational cascade
+#### Chain B: Migration legal–operational cascade
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -694,27 +685,26 @@ flowchart LR
     style Pol fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Mitigations (recommended)
+### Mitigations (recommended)
 
 1. **R1 / R3 / R10** — Kriminalvården quarterly capacity-status publication cadence, with KU pre-flagging the Q2 2026 status report. Cost: low. Source: `HD01CU25` + Kriminalvården standard reporting.
 2. **R2 / R5** — Pre-enactment Migrationsverket IT architecture review by PTS/Digg; proportionality impact assessment published alongside ordinance. Source: `HD01SfU23`.
 3. **R4** — FiU to schedule Riksbank recapitalisation hearing separately from annual review to separate narratives. Source: `HD01FiU23`.
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 Every row cites `dok_id` + authoritative implementation agency URL (kriminalvarden.se, migrationsverket.se, riksbank.se, ilo.org, ei.se, domstol.se, av.se).
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Framework**: `analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md` + TOWS matrix.
 **Scope**: the 5-report cluster tabled 2026-04-23.
 **Confidence**: HIGH (B2).
 
-## SWOT matrix
+### SWOT matrix
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |:-:|----------|----------|:---------:|
@@ -724,7 +714,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | S4 | Researcher carve-out in SfU23 protects competitiveness narrative | `HD01SfU23` carve-out for forskare/doktorander at [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23) | A1 |
 | S5 | Cross-committee composition demonstrates coalition working throughput | CU+SfU+FiU+AU all tabled same day (5 reports) per [riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/) calendar | A1 |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 | # | Weakness | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |:-:|----------|----------|:---------:|
@@ -734,7 +724,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | W4 | AU15 ratification timing (Sweden among the later ratifiers of C190) is defensive framing | ILO ratifications list at [ilo.org](https://www.ilo.org/); Denmark 2022, Finland 2023 | A1 |
 | W5 | CU29 funding model for home-charging subsidies is underspecified in the report title scope | `HD01CU29` at [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29) | A1 |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |:-:|-------------|----------|:---------:|
@@ -744,7 +734,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | O4 | FiU23 review anchors standing inflation-credibility message pre-election | `HD01FiU23` + [riksbank.se Penningpolitisk rapport](https://www.riksbank.se/) | A1 |
 | O5 | CU25 procurement velocity creates civil-construction jobs in low-population regions | `HD01CU25` + Kriminalvården planned sites at [kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/) | B2 |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 | # | Threat | Evidence | Admiralty |
 |:-:|--------|----------|:---------:|
@@ -754,20 +744,20 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | T4 | ILO ratification + transposition creates compliance litigation baseline for employers | `HD01AU15` + Svenskt Näringsliv position papers at [svensktnaringsliv.se](https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/) | B2 |
 | T5 | CU29 home-charging incentives capture by grid-peak cost allocation creates regressive effect | `HD01CU29` + Energimarknadsinspektionen tariff framework [ei.se](https://www.ei.se/) | C3 |
 
-## TOWS matrix (derived strategies)
+### TOWS matrix (derived strategies)
 
 | | S (internal +) | W (internal -) |
 |---|----------------|----------------|
 | **O (external +)** | **SO**: Pair S1+S3 with O1+O2 — message "delivery + EU-compatible workers' rights + climate" (`HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29`) | **WO**: Use O1 (EU PWD pair) to offset W4 (late ratification) narrative on `HD01AU15` |
 | **T (external -)** | **ST**: Use S2 institutional credibility (`HD01FiU23`) to preempt T3 balance-sheet narrative | **WT**: Pre-publish Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status to defuse W1+T1 combination on `HD01CU25` |
 
-## Cross-SWOT integration (policy clusters)
+### Cross-SWOT integration (policy clusters)
 
 - **Law-and-order delivery cluster** (CU25 ↔ SfU23): S1+S4 combine with T1+T2 — if CU25 timeline slips *and* SfU23 gets judicial pushback, the combined narrative inversion is larger than either alone. Source: `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`.
 - **Institutional-stewardship cluster** (FiU23 ↔ AU15): S2+O4 combine to anchor a pre-election "responsible management" frame; T3 is the counter-frame. Source: `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`.
 - **Climate-mobility cluster** (CU29 only): isolated; O2 creates option to pair with future CU committee agenda. Source: `HD01CU29`.
 
-## Cluster diagram
+### Cluster diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TB
@@ -790,21 +780,20 @@ flowchart TB
     style NarrInv fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 All rows cite `dok_id` + primary-source URL. See `cross-reference-map.md` for policy-cluster citations.
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Framework**: `analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md` — Political Threat Taxonomy with attack tree + kill chain + MITRE-style TTP mapping.
 **Scope**: threats to democratic institutions, policy integrity, and epistemic environment arising from today's 5-report cluster.
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM (C3) — intent signals are indirect; capability signals are well-attested.
 
-## Threat taxonomy (per-category)
+### Threat taxonomy (per-category)
 
-### Institutional threats
+#### Institutional threats
 
 | T# | Threat | Source | Kill-chain stage | Admiralty |
 |:-:|--------|--------|------------------|:---------:|
@@ -812,7 +801,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | TI-2 | CU25 planning-law carve-outs normalising shortcut procedure for future infra | `HD01CU25` + Miljöbalken 6 kap references ([riksdagen.se/dokument/1998:808](https://www.riksdagen.se/)) | Install (precedent) | B2 |
 | TI-3 | Migrationsöverdomstolen caseload surge degrading appeal-quality on SfU23 | `HD01SfU23` + [domstol.se](https://www.domstol.se/) appeal-handling-time metric | Impact (institutional capacity) | B3 |
 
-### Policy-integrity threats
+#### Policy-integrity threats
 
 | T# | Threat | Source | Kill-chain stage | Admiralty |
 |:-:|--------|--------|------------------|:---------:|
@@ -820,7 +809,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | TP-2 | CU29 subsidy capture by property-developer lobby re-routing design | `HD01CU29` + public consultation history on energy/property interface ([boverket.se](https://www.boverket.se/)) | Exploit (regulatory-design) | C3 |
 | TP-3 | AU15 employer-compliance guidance thinning under ratification-without-resources dynamic | `HD01AU15` + [av.se](https://www.av.se/) resource trajectory | Impact (enforcement gap) | B3 |
 
-### Epistemic / information threats
+#### Epistemic / information threats
 
 | T# | Threat | Source | Kill-chain stage | Admiralty |
 |:-:|--------|--------|------------------|:---------:|
@@ -828,7 +817,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | TE-2 | Social-media narrative lock-in on SfU23 "abuse" framing ahead of researcher-carve-out media cycle | `HD01SfU23` + MSB / Diggs reports | Reconnaissance/Amplify | C3 |
 | TE-3 | Polarised framing of ILO C190 as foreign-imposed on Swedish labour model | `HD01AU15` + [ilo.org](https://www.ilo.org/) ratification coverage | Weaponise | D3 |
 
-## Attack tree — CU25 delegitimisation (illustrative)
+### Attack tree — CU25 delegitimisation (illustrative)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -863,7 +852,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style C2 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Kill chain mapping
+### Kill chain mapping
 
 | Stage | CU25 pathway | SfU23 pathway | FiU23 pathway |
 |-------|--------------|---------------|----------------|
@@ -874,7 +863,7 @@ flowchart TD
 | Install | Precedent on planning-law shortcut | Precedent on proportionality threshold | Precedent on recapitalisation procedure |
 | Impact | Delivery credibility | Appeal capacity + research mobility | Monetary-policy credibility |
 
-## MITRE-style political TTP map
+### MITRE-style political TTP map
 
 | TTP ID | Technique | Instantiation |
 |--------|-----------|---------------|
@@ -885,48 +874,47 @@ flowchart TD
 | PT-IN-005 | Install: precedent anchoring | Planning-law carve-out on `HD01CU25` |
 | PT-IM-006 | Impact: institutional-credibility erosion | Riksbank independence narrative on `HD01FiU23` |
 
-## Threat prioritisation
+### Threat prioritisation
 
 - **P1 (active, monitor)**: TI-1 (Riksbank narrative), TI-2 (CU25 planning precedent), TI-3 (Migration court capacity).
 - **P2 (latent, prepare)**: TP-1 (SfU23 ordinance scope-creep), TE-1 (CU25 disinfo).
 - **P3 (watch)**: TP-2 / TP-3 / TE-2 / TE-3.
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 All threats cited with `dok_id` + primary agency URL. Epistemic threats calibrated against [msb.se](https://www.msb.se/) disinformation baseline (2023–25 reports, B2).
 
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01AU15
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md -->
 
 **Committee**: Arbetsmarknadsutskottet (AU)
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26   **Tabling date**: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 **DIW**: 45
 **Confidence on analysis**: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Internationell arbetsrätt; ILO C190 trolig huvudfokus. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md), [`../cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)).
 
-## Document identifiers
+### Document identifiers
 
 - **`dok_id`**: `HD01AU15`
 - **Primary source**: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15) [A1]
 - **Committee landing**: [riksdagen.se/au](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/) [A1]
 
-## Key content inferred
+### Key content inferred
 
 - Title: "Internationella arbetsorganisationens (ILO) konventioner, protokoll och rekommendationer"
 - Committee discipline: Arbetsmarknadsutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.
 - Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per `../coalition-mathematics.md`.
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 This report carries **DIW 45** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md). Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`.
 
-## Linked artifacts
+### Linked artifacts
 
 - Cluster overview: [`../README.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md)
 - Executive brief: [`../executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
@@ -938,7 +926,7 @@ This report carries **DIW 45** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-
 - Scenarios: [`../scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
 - Intelligence assessment: [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)
 
-## Document-specific Mermaid
+### Document-specific Mermaid
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -951,45 +939,44 @@ flowchart LR
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Pass-2 note
+### Pass-2 note
 
 Pass 2 revalidated DIW 45 against sensitivity band documented in `../significance-scoring.md` and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with [`../coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) and [`../election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md).
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01AU15"})` → data.riksdagen.se [A1]
 - Committee context: [riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]
 
 ### HD01CU25
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md -->
 
 **Committee**: Civilutskottet (CU)
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26   **Tabling date**: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 **DIW**: 85
 **Confidence on analysis**: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 +8 500 häktes-/anstaltsplatser över 2026–2030; planlagsundantag. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md), [`../cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)).
 
-## Document identifiers
+### Document identifiers
 
 - **`dok_id`**: `HD01CU25`
 - **Primary source**: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25) [A1]
 - **Committee landing**: [riksdagen.se/cu](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/) [A1]
 
-## Key content inferred
+### Key content inferred
 
 - Title: "Kriminalvårdens kapacitet"
 - Committee discipline: Civilutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.
 - Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per `../coalition-mathematics.md`.
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 This report carries **DIW 85** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md). Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`.
 
-## Linked artifacts
+### Linked artifacts
 
 - Cluster overview: [`../README.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md)
 - Executive brief: [`../executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
@@ -1001,7 +988,7 @@ This report carries **DIW 85** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-
 - Scenarios: [`../scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
 - Intelligence assessment: [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)
 
-## Document-specific Mermaid
+### Document-specific Mermaid
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1014,45 +1001,44 @@ flowchart LR
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Pass-2 note
+### Pass-2 note
 
 Pass 2 revalidated DIW 85 against sensitivity band documented in `../significance-scoring.md` and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with [`../coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) and [`../election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md).
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01CU25"})` → data.riksdagen.se [A1]
 - Committee context: [riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]
 
 ### HD01CU29
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md -->
 
 **Committee**: Civilutskottet (CU)
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26   **Tabling date**: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 **DIW**: 50
 **Confidence on analysis**: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Laddbox/typ-2 subsidieregim; Boverket + Energimyndigheten. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md), [`../cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)).
 
-## Document identifiers
+### Document identifiers
 
 - **`dok_id`**: `HD01CU29`
 - **Primary source**: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29) [A1]
 - **Committee landing**: [riksdagen.se/cu](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/) [A1]
 
-## Key content inferred
+### Key content inferred
 
 - Title: "Laddning av elfordon i det egna hemmet"
 - Committee discipline: Civilutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.
 - Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per `../coalition-mathematics.md`.
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 This report carries **DIW 50** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md). Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`.
 
-## Linked artifacts
+### Linked artifacts
 
 - Cluster overview: [`../README.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md)
 - Executive brief: [`../executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
@@ -1064,7 +1050,7 @@ This report carries **DIW 50** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-
 - Scenarios: [`../scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
 - Intelligence assessment: [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)
 
-## Document-specific Mermaid
+### Document-specific Mermaid
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1077,45 +1063,44 @@ flowchart LR
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Pass-2 note
+### Pass-2 note
 
 Pass 2 revalidated DIW 50 against sensitivity band documented in `../significance-scoring.md` and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with [`../coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) and [`../election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md).
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01CU29"})` → data.riksdagen.se [A1]
 - Committee context: [riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]
 
 ### HD01FiU23
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md -->
 
 **Committee**: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26   **Tabling date**: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 **DIW**: 65
 **Confidence on analysis**: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Balansräkning 2024–25, rekapitaliseringsfråga latent. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md), [`../cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)).
 
-## Document identifiers
+### Document identifiers
 
 - **`dok_id`**: `HD01FiU23`
 - **Primary source**: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23) [A1]
 - **Committee landing**: [riksdagen.se/fiu](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/) [A1]
 
-## Key content inferred
+### Key content inferred
 
 - Title: "Riksbankens verksamhet 2025"
 - Committee discipline: Finansutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.
 - Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per `../coalition-mathematics.md`.
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 This report carries **DIW 65** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md). Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`.
 
-## Linked artifacts
+### Linked artifacts
 
 - Cluster overview: [`../README.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md)
 - Executive brief: [`../executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
@@ -1127,7 +1112,7 @@ This report carries **DIW 65** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-
 - Scenarios: [`../scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
 - Intelligence assessment: [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)
 
-## Document-specific Mermaid
+### Document-specific Mermaid
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1140,45 +1125,44 @@ flowchart LR
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Pass-2 note
+### Pass-2 note
 
 Pass 2 revalidated DIW 65 against sensitivity band documented in `../significance-scoring.md` and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with [`../coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) and [`../election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md).
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01FiU23"})` → data.riksdagen.se [A1]
 - Committee context: [riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]
 
 ### HD01SfU23
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md -->
 
 **Committee**: Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)
 **Riksmöte**: 2025/26   **Tabling date**: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 **DIW**: 80
 **Confidence on analysis**: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Dubbelspår: skärpning + forskarundantag. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see [`../synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md), [`../cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)).
 
-## Document identifiers
+### Document identifiers
 
 - **`dok_id`**: `HD01SfU23`
 - **Primary source**: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23) [A1]
 - **Committee landing**: [riksdagen.se/sfu](https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/) [A1]
 
-## Key content inferred
+### Key content inferred
 
 - Title: "Migration, arbetskraft och forskare"
 - Committee discipline: Socialförsäkringsutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.
 - Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per `../coalition-mathematics.md`.
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 This report carries **DIW 80** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md). Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`.
 
-## Linked artifacts
+### Linked artifacts
 
 - Cluster overview: [`../README.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md)
 - Executive brief: [`../executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
@@ -1190,7 +1174,7 @@ This report carries **DIW 80** in the cluster ranking — see [`../significance-
 - Scenarios: [`../scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
 - Intelligence assessment: [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)
 
-## Document-specific Mermaid
+### Document-specific Mermaid
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1203,23 +1187,22 @@ flowchart LR
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Pass-2 note
+### Pass-2 note
 
 Pass 2 revalidated DIW 80 against sensitivity band documented in `../significance-scoring.md` and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with [`../coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md) and [`../election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md).
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01SfU23"})` → data.riksdagen.se [A1]
 - Committee context: [riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Horizon**: Sep 2026 general election (~140 days from base date).
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM (C3) on electoral impact inferences; HIGH (B2) on delivery-indicator logic.
 
-## Electoral salience ranking of cluster items
+### Electoral salience ranking of cluster items
 
 | Item | Electoral salience (0-100) | Base for rating | Expected voter segments activated |
 |------|:--------------------------:|-----------------|----------------------------------|
@@ -1229,19 +1212,19 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | `HD01AU15` ILO | 35 | Low mass-salient, HR/labour niche | Unionised workers, liberal professional |
 | `HD01CU29` EV home charging | 45 | Moderate suburban-detached-housing salient | M suburban, MP climate, L suburban |
 
-## Likely campaign framings
+### Likely campaign framings
 
-### Tidö framings (pro)
+#### Tidö framings (pro)
 1. **Delivery ledger**: "Vi levererar: 8 500 nya häktes-/anstaltsplatser (CU25), stramare migration med kompetensskydd (SfU23), ansvarsfull ekonomi (FiU23)."
 2. **Breadth**: "Vi ratificerar också internationella arbetsnormer (AU15) och stöttar omställningen (CU29)."
 
-### Opposition framings (contra)
+#### Opposition framings (contra)
 1. **S** — "Tidö misslyckas med välfärd medan man bygger fängelser" (social-priority inversion).
 2. **V** — "Institutionella fundament urholkas" (Riksbank + Riksrevisionen framing).
 3. **MP** — "Klimatomställning underprioriteras jämfört med straffskärpning."
 4. **C** — "Kommunalt självbestämmande undergrävs av CU25-planlagsundantag."
 
-## Potential inflection points
+### Potential inflection points
 
 | Date (approx) | Event | Expected electoral consequence |
 |---------------|-------|-------------------------------|
@@ -1251,12 +1234,12 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | 2026-08 | Migration-permit Q2 stats | If abuse-statistic drops: SfU23 asset; else liability |
 | 2026-09 | General election | Outcome |
 
-## Coalition-stress electoral implication
+### Coalition-stress electoral implication
 
 - **SD–L stress** on SfU23 is contained (< 20 % defection probability per KJ-3). L electorate (urban liberal, university towns) responsive to carve-out framing.
 - **M–KD stress** on CU29 subsidy cost is low-grade; KD electorate (suburban family) receptive to distributive framing.
 
-## Expected polling impact
+### Expected polling impact
 
 Based on Bayesian update on 2022–24 committee-report clusters:
 - **If delivery on CU25 + SfU23**: Tidö bloc +1.5 to +3 pp through August 2026.
@@ -1265,7 +1248,7 @@ Based on Bayesian update on 2022–24 committee-report clusters:
 
 Prior distribution P(delivery-on-track) = 0.45; P(CU25-only-slip) = 0.30; P(both-slip) = 0.25.
 
-## Cluster-level electoral impact diagram
+### Cluster-level electoral impact diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1295,20 +1278,19 @@ flowchart TD
     style Sep fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` [A1]
 - [val.se](https://www.val.se/) (election calendar) [A1]
 - Novus/Sifo 2025 Q4 priority rankings ([novus.se](https://novus.se/)) [B2]
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Current 2022–2026 Riksdag arithmetic applied to cluster-item voting scenarios.
 **Confidence**: HIGH (B2) on seat counts; MEDIUM (C3) on defection probabilities.
 
-## Current Riksdag seat distribution (349 mandat)
+### Current Riksdag seat distribution (349 mandat)
 
 | Parti | Mandat | Block |
 |-------|:------:|-------|
@@ -1325,9 +1307,9 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 Source: [riksdagen.se/ledamoter-och-partier](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1].
 
-## Expected floor vote projections
+### Expected floor vote projections
 
-### `HD01CU25` prison capacity — Expected outcome
+#### `HD01CU25` prison capacity — Expected outcome
 
 | Result | S | SD | M | V | C | KD | MP | L | Total |
 |--------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-----:|
@@ -1339,7 +1321,7 @@ Source: [riksdagen.se/ledamoter-och-partier](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1].
 
 Outcome: adopted 176-173. Tidö margin 3 seats — no defections tolerable.
 
-### `HD01SfU23` migration/researchers — Expected outcome
+#### `HD01SfU23` migration/researchers — Expected outcome
 
 | Result | S | SD | M | V | C | KD | MP | L | Total |
 |--------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-----:|
@@ -1351,7 +1333,7 @@ Outcome: adopted 176-173. Tidö margin 3 seats — no defections tolerable.
 
 Conditional on L staying: adopted 176-173. If L defects (< 20 % probability per KJ-3): 160-189, defeated.
 
-### `HD01FiU23` Riksbank 2025 — Expected outcome
+#### `HD01FiU23` Riksbank 2025 — Expected outcome
 
 | Result | S | SD | M | V | C | KD | MP | L | Total |
 |--------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-----:|
@@ -1363,7 +1345,7 @@ Conditional on L staying: adopted 176-173. If L defects (< 20 % probability per
 
 Broad-consensus review — expected adoption 307-42.
 
-### `HD01AU15` ILO ratification — Expected outcome
+#### `HD01AU15` ILO ratification — Expected outcome
 
 | Result | S | SD | M | V | C | KD | MP | L | Total |
 |--------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-----:|
@@ -1375,7 +1357,7 @@ Broad-consensus review — expected adoption 307-42.
 
 Expected adoption 276-73 with SD opposition likely (nationalist frame).
 
-### `HD01CU29` EV home charging — Expected outcome
+#### `HD01CU29` EV home charging — Expected outcome
 
 | Result | S | SD | M | V | C | KD | MP | L | Total |
 |--------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-----:|
@@ -1387,7 +1369,7 @@ Expected adoption 276-73 with SD opposition likely (nationalist frame).
 
 Adopted 176-0; opposition abstains (distributive critique but not full opposition).
 
-## Post-election 2026 scenarios (350 polling + Sifo baseline)
+### Post-election 2026 scenarios (350 polling + Sifo baseline)
 
 | Scenario (Q4 2025) | Tidö Σ | Opposition Σ | Delta from current |
 |--------------------|:------:|:------------:|:------------------:|
@@ -1395,7 +1377,7 @@ Adopted 176-0; opposition abstains (distributive critique but not full oppositio
 | Optimistic-delivery projection | 172-178 | 171-177 | Knife-edge |
 | Pessimistic-slip projection | 158-164 | 185-191 | Opposition majority ≥ 12 |
 
-## Coalition arithmetic diagram
+### Coalition arithmetic diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1431,20 +1413,19 @@ flowchart LR
     style MP fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - [riksdagen.se/ledamoter-och-partier](https://www.riksdagen.se/) seat distribution [A1]
 - `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` [A1]
 - Q4 2025 polling: Novus, Sifo, Demoskop aggregates [B2]
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 **Segmentation framework**: Swedish voter archetypes (7 segments) × cluster items.
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM (C3) on activation probabilities.
 
-## Segment × item activation matrix
+### Segment × item activation matrix
 
 | Segment | CU25 | SfU23 | FiU23 | AU15 | CU29 | Net activation |
 |---------|:---:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:--------------:|
@@ -1458,19 +1439,19 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 
 Percentages approximate 2025 Q4 electorate structure per SCB [A1] + Novus segmentation ([novus.se](https://novus.se/)) [B2].
 
-## Swing-voter identification
+### Swing-voter identification
 
 Two segments are pivotal for September:
 - **Segment 3 (urban liberal professionals)** — moved between L/C/M/S historically. SfU23 carve-out + AU15 ratification can lock in L vote; CU25 net neutral.
 - **Segment 4 (suburban family voters)** — swing between M/KD and S. CU25 + CU29 combination can reinforce M/KD cohesion; CU29 is a distributional test.
 
-## Activation pathways
+### Activation pathways
 
 1. **Tidö-favourable pathway**: CU25 on-track + SfU23 carve-out operational + CU29 subsidy delivered → activation in segments 1, 4, with partial 3 — net + 1.5 to + 3 pp.
 2. **Opposition-favourable pathway**: CU25 slip + SfU23 legal cascade + welfare-priority inversion framing effective → activation in segments 2, 5, 6 — net + 1 to + 2 pp opposition.
 3. **Institutional-independence pathway**: FiU23 recapitalisation becomes central debate → activation in segments 3, 5 — ambiguous net effect; depends on framing.
 
-## Segment diagram
+### Segment diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1506,21 +1487,20 @@ flowchart LR
     style Sep fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - 2025 Q4 SCB electorate structure ([scb.se](https://www.scb.se/)) [A1]
 - Novus/Sifo segmentation ([novus.se](https://novus.se/)) [B2]
 - `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` [A1]
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Outside-In analysis with Nordic + EU comparator set.
 **Comparator set**: Denmark (primary Nordic), Finland (primary Nordic), Norway (Nordic non-EU), Germany (EU large-state), Netherlands (EU mid-state).
 **Confidence**: HIGH on ratification dates and formal regimes (A1); MEDIUM on implementation quality inferences (B2).
 
-## Comparator summary table
+### Comparator summary table
 
 | Jurisdiction | ILO C190 ratified | Prison-capacity model | Central-bank recap precedent | Migration-research carve-out | EV home-charging regime |
 |--------------|:-----------------:|-----------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------|
@@ -1531,24 +1511,24 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | **Germany** | 2022 ([bmas.de](https://www.bmas.de/)) | Federal-state co-investment on Justizvollzug | Bundesbank statutory framework (ECB) | Blaue Karte + research fast-track | KfW home-charging programme ([kfw.de](https://www.kfw.de/)) |
 | **Netherlands** | 2023 ([rijksoverheid.nl](https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/)) | Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen long-term capacity plan | DNB recap via statutory process ([dnb.nl](https://www.dnb.nl/)) | Kennismigrant visa regime ([ind.nl](https://ind.nl/)) | Subsidieregeling elektrische personenauto's ([rvo.nl](https://www.rvo.nl/)) |
 
-## Outside-In lessons
+### Outside-In lessons
 
-### For `HD01AU15` (ILO ratification)
+#### For `HD01AU15` (ILO ratification)
 Sweden is among the later ratifiers — Denmark 2022, Finland/Norway/Netherlands 2023, Germany 2022. The late-ratification framing is quantitatively supported: of 5 Nordic/EU comparators, 4 ratified C190 before Sweden. Defence: Swedish legal compatibility review ([regeringen.se](https://www.regeringen.se/)) treated C190 as requiring transposition work in Diskrimineringslagen and Arbetsmiljölagen — a substantive rather than symbolic approach. [Source A1 ilo.org]
 
-### For `HD01CU25` (prison capacity)
+#### For `HD01CU25` (prison capacity)
 Denmark's 2021 leased-capacity + Kosovo pilot is the most aggressive Nordic precedent; Finland's 2023 bill is closest in shape to CU25. Comparative risk signal: both neighbours faced procedural legal challenges before construction began — Sweden's planning-law carve-out pathway has to be evaluated against those experiences. [Source A2 om.fi / justitsministeriet.dk]
 
-### For `HD01FiU23` (Riksbank 2025)
+#### For `HD01FiU23` (Riksbank 2025)
 The Nordic / Eurozone central-bank recap framework precedents — Nationalbanken (DK, statutory reserve), Norges Bank (NO, petroleum-fund interaction), Bundesbank/DNB (EU, Eurosystem framework) — show the **procedural separation** between annual review and recapitalisation as standard practice. FiU should sequence accordingly. [Source A1 riksbank.se + comparator central-bank sites]
 
-### For `HD01SfU23` (migration / research)
+#### For `HD01SfU23` (migration / research)
 Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands all operate researcher fast-tracks. Sweden's SfU23 carve-out brings it into parity. The abuse-prevention framing is the Swedish-specific differentiator — Denmark's NyiDanmark enforcement model is the closest analogue. [Source A2 nyidanmark.dk]
 
-### For `HD01CU29` (EV home-charging)
+#### For `HD01CU29` (EV home-charging)
 Finland's ARA subsidy and Norway's Enova schemes are the most mature Nordic comparators; both show that take-up concentrates in detached-housing demographics without multi-dwelling provisions — the regressivity concern in R7 of `risk-assessment.md` is replicated internationally. [Source A2 enova.no / ara.fi]
 
-## Comparator diagram
+### Comparator diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1572,42 +1552,41 @@ flowchart LR
     style ILO fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 All ratification dates from ilo.org NORMLEX database [A1]; all comparator agencies cited above.
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 **Framework**: historical-pattern analysis with ≥ 3 prior precedents; Admiralty-coded sources.
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM (C3) on causal analogies.
 
-## Parallel 1 — Pre-election committee-report clustering (2022, 2018, 2014)
+### Parallel 1 — Pre-election committee-report clustering (2022, 2018, 2014)
 
 Incumbent governments have historically front-loaded committee reports in the final spring before September elections. 2018 S+MP government tabled ≥ 5 signature committee reports in April-May; 2014 S-led opposition-constraining cluster in spring 2014; 2022 S government in April 2022. Base rate for pre-election cluster: ~ 80 % of incumbencies. [B2, riksdagen.se/kalender archives]
 
-## Parallel 2 — Kriminalvården capacity plans (2020, 2023)
+### Parallel 2 — Kriminalvården capacity plans (2020, 2023)
 
 Two prior capacity-expansion plans (2020, 2023) — both missed original timelines by ≥ 15 % within 18 months ([kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/) annual reports) [A2]. This is the base-rate input to KJ-2's 55 % slippage posterior on CU25. The 2023 plan additionally triggered two Riksrevisionen follow-up reviews ([riksrevisionen.se](https://www.riksrevisionen.se/)) [A2].
 
-## Parallel 3 — Central-bank recapitalisation episodes (Sweden 2013, Denmark 2020)
+### Parallel 3 — Central-bank recapitalisation episodes (Sweden 2013, Denmark 2020)
 
 Sweden 2013 Riksbank profit-distribution reform occurred quietly without chamber debate — counter-example to our FiU23 recapitalisation-debate scenario, suggesting the ~ 45 % probability is in line with the base rate rather than above it. Denmark 2020 Nationalbanken statutory-reserve framework — closer parallel: the FiU comparator-reference point for a separate recap hearing. ([riksbank.se](https://www.riksbank.se/), [nationalbanken.dk](https://www.nationalbanken.dk/)) [A1].
 
-## Parallel 4 — Migration-permit abuse-prevention / carve-out pairing (2014, 2017, 2021)
+### Parallel 4 — Migration-permit abuse-prevention / carve-out pairing (2014, 2017, 2021)
 
 The pairing of tightening + specialist carve-out is a repeat pattern in Swedish migration legislation: 2014 S carve-out for IT/researchers; 2017 S-MP carve-out for doctoral candidates; 2021 S tightening with doctoral retention. [B2, riksdagen.se] SfU23 fits this pattern; risk that implementation ordinance narrows the carve-out in practice is empirically supported — 2014 carve-out was operationally narrowed within 12 months.
 
-## Parallel 5 — ILO convention ratification delays (C189, C183, C190)
+### Parallel 5 — ILO convention ratification delays (C189, C183, C190)
 
 Sweden has a recurring pattern of ratifying ILO conventions several years after Nordic peers: C189 (domestic workers, 2011): Sweden 2019 vs DK 2014; C183 (maternity): Sweden 2020 vs DK 2013; C190 now 2026 vs DK 2022. Pattern is substantive-compatibility-review culture rather than neglect. [A1, ilo.org NORMLEX]
 
-## Parallel 6 — EV subsidy / distributive risk (2017 Elbilspremien, 2022 Klimatbonus)
+### Parallel 6 — EV subsidy / distributive risk (2017 Elbilspremien, 2022 Klimatbonus)
 
 Both prior EV-subsidy regimes were critiqued as regressive by Riksrevisionen and S/V/MP opposition. Both were eventually re-scoped with income / housing-type caps. CU29's regressivity risk is historically reliably materialised. [A2, riksrevisionen.se]
 
-## Mini-diagram of historical-parallel pattern match
+### Mini-diagram of historical-parallel pattern match
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1631,7 +1610,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style M6 fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - [riksdagen.se/kalender](https://www.riksdagen.se/) historical calendar archives [A1]
 - [kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/) annual reports 2020-2024 [A2]
@@ -1640,13 +1619,12 @@ flowchart TD
 - `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` [A1]
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 **Framework**: agency-capacity assessment + risk-adjusted implementation scoring.
 **Confidence**: HIGH (B2) on agency-mandate; MEDIUM (C3) on capacity forecasts.
 
-## Feasibility matrix (0-100 composite)
+### Feasibility matrix (0-100 composite)
 
 | Item | Agency capacity | Budget allocation | Legal complexity | Political alignment | Timeline realism | Composite |
 |------|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:---:|
@@ -1656,28 +1634,28 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 | `HD01AU15` ILO ratification | 80 | 80 | 75 | 85 | 80 | **80** |
 | `HD01CU29` EV home charging | 75 | 70 | 80 | 75 | 75 | **75** |
 
-## Critical-path items
+### Critical-path items
 
-### CU25 — Kriminalvården capacity expansion (composite 65)
+#### CU25 — Kriminalvården capacity expansion (composite 65)
 - **Primary constraint**: capacity-absorption of + 8 500 platser requires sustained recruitment and procurement. Historical base rate: 85 % of such plans slip ≥ 10 %. [A2, kriminalvarden.se]
 - **Secondary constraint**: planning-law carve-out faces municipal-level legal challenges (2014–2023 base rate: 3–5 challenges per large capacity project).
 - **Key milestone**: Q2 2026 capacity-status report.
 
-### SfU23 — Migration/researchers (composite 63)
+#### SfU23 — Migration/researchers (composite 63)
 - **Primary constraint**: Migrationsverket transformation programme — dependencies on Digg ([digg.se](https://www.digg.se/)) [A2].
 - **Secondary constraint**: dual-track permit processing IT requires ordinance + system integration. Historical base rate: migration-system changes take 12–18 months to operationalise.
 - **Key milestone**: implementation ordinance (summer 2026) + Migrationsverket IT milestone (Q3 2026).
 
-### FiU23 — Riksbank 2025 review (composite 86)
+#### FiU23 — Riksbank 2025 review (composite 86)
 - Standing review; no novel implementation workload. Recapitalisation decision (separate ordinance if needed) is the only contingent operational load.
 
-### AU15 — ILO ratification (composite 80)
+#### AU15 — ILO ratification (composite 80)
 - Diskrimineringslagen + Arbetsmiljölagen transposition straightforward. DO + AV implementation guidance cycle ([do.se](https://www.do.se/), [av.se](https://www.av.se/)) [A2].
 
-### CU29 — EV home-charging (composite 75)
+#### CU29 — EV home-charging (composite 75)
 - Energimyndigheten ([energimyndigheten.se](https://www.energimyndigheten.se/)) + Boverket ([boverket.se](https://www.boverket.se/)) implementation [A2]. Subsidy-rollout mechanics well-understood; regressivity mitigation requires separate ordinance.
 
-## Feasibility-stress diagram
+### Feasibility-stress diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1705,33 +1683,32 @@ flowchart TD
     style R5 fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - [kriminalvarden.se](https://www.kriminalvarden.se/), [migrationsverket.se](https://www.migrationsverket.se/), [riksbank.se](https://www.riksbank.se/), [do.se](https://www.do.se/), [av.se](https://www.av.se/), [energimyndigheten.se](https://www.energimyndigheten.se/), [boverket.se](https://www.boverket.se/), [digg.se](https://www.digg.se/) [A2]
 - `HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`, `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29` [A1]
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — Heuer methodology; Red-Team challenge.
 **Confidence**: MEDIUM (C3) — hypotheses test analytic robustness of the mainline reading.
 
-## Competing hypotheses
+### Competing hypotheses
 
-### H1 — Mainline: Coordinated pre-election signalling cluster
+#### H1 — Mainline: Coordinated pre-election signalling cluster
 The five-report tabling is a deliberate Tidö composition to front-load delivery signals ahead of Sep 2026.
 
-### H2 — Bureaucratic coincidence
+#### H2 — Bureaucratic coincidence
 The clustering is a mechanical consequence of the Riksdag calendar — betänkanden accumulate for chamber decision before summer recess; committee-chair scheduling is the driver, not strategic messaging.
 
-### H3 — Defensive scrambling
+#### H3 — Defensive scrambling
 The cluster reflects Tidö anxiety about slipping delivery metrics; signature items are being rushed through committee to lock in a pre-election record before unfavourable data emerges.
 
-### H4 — Coalition-internal settlement
+#### H4 — Coalition-internal settlement
 The composition is the output of intra-coalition horse-trading: SD got CU25 + SfU23 hard framing; L got SfU23 carve-out + AU15 ratification; M balances; KD neutralised on CU29 cost caution — each party gets enough to defend its vote.
 
-## ACH matrix
+### ACH matrix
 
 Evidence mapped to consistency with each hypothesis (C = consistent, I = inconsistent, N = neutral, ? = ambiguous).
 
@@ -1752,7 +1729,7 @@ Evidence mapped to consistency with each hypothesis (C = consistent, I = inconsi
 
 **Decision**: present H1 as mainline, with explicit acknowledgement that H4 (horse-trading) is the likely intra-coalition mechanism. H3 is the **downside scenario** to monitor.
 
-## Red-Team challenge
+### Red-Team challenge
 
 **Claim we are most likely wrong about**: the CU25 DIW of 85. Red team contends: (a) CU25 may be operationally blocked by local-council procedural challenges before construction starts, reducing actual impact despite high symbolic weight; (b) prior Kriminalvården capacity-plan misses (2020, 2023) suggest a base rate of under-delivery that should drag CU25's implementation-impact sub-score down; (c) if delivery is performative rather than operational, DIW may reflect attention-weight more than decision-weight.
 
@@ -1760,25 +1737,24 @@ Evidence mapped to consistency with each hypothesis (C = consistent, I = inconsi
 
 **Second challenge**: SfU23 may be overrated as a coalition-stress driver (DIW 80, coalition-stress 85). Red team: L may not actually defect because the researcher carve-out already accommodates its preference; the "SD–L tension" narrative may be media framing more than institutional reality. **Response**: carve-out acceptance depends on ministerial ordinance scope, which is TBD — residual tension real but conditional. Retain current scoring.
 
-## Rejected hypothesis log
+### Rejected hypothesis log
 
 - **H2 (bureaucratic coincidence)**: retained as null hypothesis for methodology purposes only. Inconsistent with E1 (simultaneous signature + breadth mix) and E2 (three signature items > base rate).
 - **Sub-hypothesis**: "the cluster signals Tidö pivot away from S-type welfare agenda". Rejected — no evidence in tabled items supports a welfare pivot; AU15 is labour-protection and CU29 is distributive.
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument` × 5 [A1]
 - regeringen.se communications trend [A2]
 - Historical Riksdag calendar: [riksdagen.se/kalender](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Method**: 7-dimension classification from `analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md`.
 **Dimensions**: (1) Policy domain, (2) Coalition alignment, (3) Salience, (4) Time-horizon, (5) Contestedness, (6) Institutional locus, (7) Classification (sensitivity).
 
-## Per-document classification
+### Per-document classification
 
 | `dok_id` | Policy domain | Coalition alignment | Salience | Horizon | Contestedness | Institutional locus | Classification / retention |
 |----------|---------------|--------------------|:-------:|---------|--------------|--------------------|--------------------------|
@@ -1788,17 +1764,17 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | `HD01AU15` | Labour / International (AU) | Broad cross-party | MEDIUM | Medium (ratification + transposition 2026–2027) | LOW (symbolic consensus) | AU committee; Arbetsmiljöverket + Diskrimineringsombudsmannen | PUBLIC; retention 25 y; open access |
 | `HD01CU29` | Climate / Housing / Mobility (CU) | Broad (MP/C/L advocate; M/KD/SD concur; SD cost-caution) | LOW–MEDIUM | Short (2026–2027 rollout) | LOW (consensus on direction, quibble on cost) | CU committee; Boverket + Energimyndigheten | PUBLIC; retention 10 y; open access |
 
-## Priority tiers (for publishing + downstream processing)
+### Priority tiers (for publishing + downstream processing)
 
 - **P0 (lead story)**: `HD01CU25` — CU25 prison capacity.
 - **P1 (secondary lead)**: `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`.
 - **P2 (breadth)**: `HD01AU15`, `HD01CU29`.
 
-## Retention & access
+### Retention & access
 
 All five classified **PUBLIC** per Offentlighetsprincipen (Public Access to Information Act, Tryckfrihetsförordningen 2:1). No personal-data processing beyond named public officials in their public role — GDPR Art. 9 basis: 9(2)(e) publicly made + 9(2)(g) substantial public interest. Retention 10 y standard for legislative records; 25 y for monetary-policy and ILO-related records (constitutional / international treaty reference value).
 
-## Classification diagram
+### Classification diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1828,45 +1804,44 @@ flowchart LR
     style Cons fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - `get_dokument` × 5 (A1), all at https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{{dok_id}}
 - Tryckfrihetsförordningen 2 kap 1 § — [riksdagen.se/TF](https://www.riksdagen.se/) (A1)
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: map policy clusters, legislative chains, coordinated-activity patterns, and sibling-folder references across the five tabled reports.
 **Confidence**: HIGH on direct committee + legislative chains (A1); MEDIUM on cluster inference (B2).
 
-## Policy clusters
+### Policy clusters
 
-### Cluster 1 — Law-and-order delivery
+#### Cluster 1 — Law-and-order delivery
 **Members**: `HD01CU25` (prison capacity), with narrative tie to earlier 2024/25 criminal-justice legislation.
 **Legislative chain**: CU25 descends from 2023 Tidöavtal priority on `straffrättslig reform + kapacitetsutbyggnad` ([regeringen.se/tidoavtalet](https://www.regeringen.se/) [A2]); connects forward to pending 2026 Q3 Kriminalvården capital-expenditure proposition.
 **Coordinated activity**: Pre-debate CU25 + SfU23 pairing in plenary is the documented pattern from prior Tidö sessions (2024 motsvarande cluster on criminal-justice + migration).
 
-### Cluster 2 — Migration enforcement + competitiveness carve-out
+#### Cluster 2 — Migration enforcement + competitiveness carve-out
 **Members**: `HD01SfU23`.
 **Legislative chain**: Descends from 2024 SfU permit-tightening legislation ([riksdagen.se/voteringar](https://www.riksdagen.se/) previous SfU votes [A1]); anchors forward to pending 2026 Migrationsverket budget (BP 2026/27).
 **Sibling folders**: `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/` (migration-related pending propositions may intersect); `analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/` (opposition motions on researcher mobility).
 
-### Cluster 3 — Monetary / institutional stewardship
+#### Cluster 3 — Monetary / institutional stewardship
 **Members**: `HD01FiU23`.
 **Legislative chain**: Standing annual review per Sveriges Riksbankslag (2022:1568) ([riksdagen.se/SFS](https://www.riksdagen.se/) [A1]); FiU23 follows 2024/25 HD01FiU23 predecessor.
 **Forward tie**: 2026 Q2 Riksbank penningpolitisk rapport ([riksbank.se](https://www.riksbank.se/)); potential 2026 Q3 recapitalisation ordinance.
 
-### Cluster 4 — International labour compliance
+#### Cluster 4 — International labour compliance
 **Members**: `HD01AU15`.
 **Legislative chain**: Descends from Regeringens skrivelse on ILO ratifications (standing periodic cycle); forward-ties to 2026–27 Arbetsmiljöverket + Diskrimineringsombudsmannen guidance updates.
 **Sibling activity**: 2026-04-14 AU propositions on workplace-safety modernisation.
 
-### Cluster 5 — Climate-mobility transition
+#### Cluster 5 — Climate-mobility transition
 **Members**: `HD01CU29`.
 **Legislative chain**: Descends from Klimatpolitiska handlingsplanen 2023–24 commitments ([regeringen.se/klimatpolitiska-handlingsplanen](https://www.regeringen.se/) [A2]); forward-ties to Boverket charging-infrastructure BBR updates.
 
-## Cross-cluster coordination matrix
+### Cross-cluster coordination matrix
 
 | | CU25 | SfU23 | FiU23 | AU15 | CU29 |
 |---|:---:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
@@ -1876,7 +1851,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 | **AU15** | None | Labour-mobility overlap | None | — | None |
 | **CU29** | CU committee shared | None | None | None | — |
 
-## Legislative chains diagram
+### Legislative chains diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1904,25 +1879,24 @@ flowchart LR
     style BBR fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sibling-folder cross-references
+### Sibling-folder cross-references
 
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/` — predecessor committee-report cluster; compare DIW ranking drift.
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/` — opposition motions that may cross-reference CU25 / SfU23 via amendment text.
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/` — proposition source material for CU25 / SfU23 (if applicable).
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-21/monthly-review/` — monthly frame anchoring, for comparative positioning.
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 All cluster references cite `dok_id` + primary URL on data.riksdagen.se, regeringen.se, riksbank.se, or riksdagen.se/SFS (constitutional text).
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: run-audit gate per `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Methodology Reflection`.
 **Standards audited**: ICD 203 (9 analytic standards), Admiralty Code, WEP/Kent confidence, OSINT tradecraft ethics, DIW weighting.
 
-## 1. Evidence sufficiency
+### 1. Evidence sufficiency
 
 - All 5 attested `dok_id` sourced via `get_dokument` (A1).
 - Implementing agency coverage: Kriminalvården, Migrationsverket, Riksbank, Arbetsmiljöverket, DO, Boverket, Energimyndigheten — all with primary-source URLs (A1–A2).
@@ -1930,7 +1904,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **Gap**: full text of the 5 reports not fetched in this run (titles + metadata only). Mitigated by committee-calendar and Tidöavtal trajectory knowledge; flagged as limitation.
 - **Gap**: current polling data not integrated. Mitigated by structural analysis; flagged as PIR-6 + PIR-7 for cross-session-intelligence in next aggregation cycle.
 
-## 2. Confidence distribution
+### 2. Confidence distribution
 
 | Level | Count | Share |
 |-------|:-----:|:-----:|
@@ -1942,7 +1916,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 HIGH:MEDIUM ratio (4:3) is calibrated — absence of VERY HIGH reflects that no judgments are derived from settled ground truth (election has not happened; Q2 reports not yet published). Absence of LOW reflects that judgments for which we lacked evidence were instead flagged as **assumptions** in §Key Assumptions Check (A1–A5), not promoted to judgments.
 
-## 3. Source diversity
+### 3. Source diversity
 
 - **Parliamentary primary**: data.riksdagen.se, riksdagen.se (A1)
 - **Government primary**: regeringen.se (A2)
@@ -1953,7 +1927,7 @@ HIGH:MEDIUM ratio (4:3) is calibrated — absence of VERY HIGH reflects that no
 
 Diversity satisfies **Source Diversity Rule**: every P0/P1 claim (KJ-1, KJ-2, KJ-3, KJ-4, KJ-7) cites ≥ 3 independent sources across categories.
 
-## 4. Party-neutrality arithmetic
+### 4. Party-neutrality arithmetic
 
 SWOT + stakeholder + scenario analysis applied evenly across parties:
 
@@ -1970,7 +1944,7 @@ SWOT + stakeholder + scenario analysis applied evenly across parties:
 
 Variance is ≤ ±3 for all parties — within neutrality tolerance (tolerance threshold: ≤ ±5 per `political-style-guide.md`). No party exceeds ±5. SD's mildly negative score reflects its own hardline positions on CU25 / SfU23 being flagged as coalition-stress factors, not analyst bias.
 
-## 5. ICD 203 audit
+### 5. ICD 203 audit
 
 | ICD 203 standard | Applied? | Evidence |
 |------------------|:--------:|----------|
@@ -1986,7 +1960,7 @@ Variance is ≤ ±3 for all parties — within neutrality tolerance (tolerance t
 
 Standard 8 is retrospective — marked as action item in §Methodology Improvements.
 
-## 6. SAT technique attestation
+### 6. SAT technique attestation
 
 Structured Analytic Techniques used in this run:
 
@@ -2004,7 +1978,7 @@ Structured Analytic Techniques used in this run:
 
 11 distinct SATs applied; meets the ≥ 10 threshold in `osint-tradecraft-standards.md`.
 
-## 7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance
+### 7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance
 
 - All data from Offentlighetsprincipen / public-data MCPs.
 - Named actors are public officials or party groups in their public capacity. No private personal data.
@@ -2012,7 +1986,7 @@ Structured Analytic Techniques used in this run:
 - No voter-level or psychographic inference beyond aggregate party positioning.
 - No third-party data sources; no scraping; no leaked/hacked material.
 
-## 8. Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)
+### 8. Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)
 
 1. **Pre-fetch full text** for at least the P0 and P1 committee reports (`HD01CU25`, `HD01SfU23`, `HD01FiU23`) by using `get_dokument_innehall` with `include_full_text: true` in the download pipeline. This will let per-document analyses cite specific paragraphs rather than inferring from titles.
 2. **Integrate Riksdag voting history on predecessor items** via `get_voteringar` — e.g. pull the prior year's corresponding bet votes to quantify coalition-stress baseline for KJ-3. Add a `prior-votes-context.json` enrichment step.
@@ -2020,20 +1994,19 @@ Structured Analytic Techniques used in this run:
 4. **Test H3 (defensive scrambling) hypothesis explicitly** at +60 d by comparing the Kriminalvården Q2 capacity figure against the CU25 implied baseline. If deviation ≥ 10 %, update hypothesis weighting.
 5. **Add comparator-side prison-capacity and migration-permit metrics** as structured JSON (`comparator-metrics.json`) so future Outside-In analyses can quantitatively compare rather than narratively compare.
 
-## 9. Limitations
+### 9. Limitations
 
 - Full text of committee reports not fetched this run (title + metadata only).
 - Polling data not integrated (relies on published 2025 Q4 / 2026 Q1 baselines).
 - Implementation-agency status reports for Q1 2026 not all available yet; some inference on capacity trajectory.
 - Comparative analysis depth varies by comparator (DK / FI deepest; DE / NL lighter).
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 This reflection cites: `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`, `osint-tradecraft-standards.md`, `political-style-guide.md`, and all 15 other artifacts in this folder.
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-24 01:06 UTC
 **Data Sources**: get_betankanden, get_dokument_innehall
@@ -2048,7 +2021,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 > `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` and using templates
 > from `analysis/templates/`.
 
-## Document Counts by Type
+### Document Counts by Type
 
 - **propositions**: 0 documents
 - **motions**: 0 documents
@@ -2058,7 +2031,39 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **questions**: 0 documents
 - **interpellations**: 0 documents
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 
 All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-23 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/article.md
index 953276c26d..0d148ee09d 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-24
 subfolder: evening-analysis
 slug: 2026-04-24-evening-analysis
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.936Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.731Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,20 +26,19 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a **four-bill pre-election delivery package** (EU Banking Package HD03253, detainee benefit restriction HD03252, tachograph enforcement HD03256, debt-management review HD03104) while the Riksdag received **five committee reports** (CU25 prison capacity, SfU23 migration bifurcation, FiU23 Riksbank review, AU15 ILO, CU29 EV charging) and fielded **16 opposition interpellations** (12 filed by S). In the preceding 72 hours the opposition filed **20 counter-motions** against 9 propositions, with SD filing **zero**. The integrated picture is of a coalition executing a **tightly synchronised pre-election legacy sprint** with SD maintaining full Tidö discipline, while S concentrates attacks on economic wedges (drivmedel, SME sick-pay) and V/MP hold the civil-liberty and foreign-policy flanks. Admiralty **A1** on document identity and filings; **B2** on strategic interpretation. **ICD 203 compliant**.
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Editorial lead selection** — evening story leads with the *pre-election legacy sprint* frame (KJ-1), not with any single dok_id, because the cross-type pattern is the story.
 2. **Forward-watch prioritisation** — FiU calendar for HD03253/HD01FiU23 and JuU calendar for HD03252 are the next 14-day pressure points (IT-1…IT-3, see `forward-indicators.md`).
 3. **Coalition stability signal** — SD's zero motions against 9 props confirms the Tidö bloc is structurally intact through summer recess; L's absence from lead ministry roles persists (see `coalition-mathematics.md §Intra-coalition load`).
 
-## ⏱ 60-second read
+### ⏱ 60-second read
 
 - **Volume**: 4 props + 5 betänkanden + 20 motions + 16 interpellations = **45 active Riksdag documents** in the 24-April cycle window.
 - **Lead story**: Pre-election legacy sprint — Kristersson government converting Tidö agenda into visible enforcement ahead of September 2026.
@@ -49,11 +48,11 @@ On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a **four-bill pre-election deliv
 - **V/MP signal**: Own civil-liberty (HD024091, HD024096) and foreign-policy (MP krigsmateriel ban) cleavages — creates narrow but durable left-bloc wedge.
 - **C signal**: Motions on 5 bills with *procedural tightening* framing — positioning for bourgeois-curious voters.
 
-## 🔮 Top forward trigger (72 h)
+### 🔮 Top forward trigger (72 h)
 
 **FT-1 · 2026-04-27 (FiU committee calendar)**: First FiU hearing on HD03253 EU Banking Package will reveal committee timetable for summer-recess enactment. A delay beyond May would signal EU transposition risk (→ scenario S3 in `scenario-analysis.md`).
 
-## 📊 Key decisions matrix
+### 📊 Key decisions matrix
 
 | Decision | Owner | Trigger | Deadline | Downstream |
 |----------|-------|---------|----------|-----------|
@@ -61,7 +60,7 @@ On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a **four-bill pre-election deliv
 | Prep HD03252 civil-liberty angle | Editorial | ECtHR precedent research | 2026-05-01 | Wedge story + ECHR context |
 | Forward-watch HD03252 enactment | Editorial | Riksdag vote ≥ 1 Aug 2026 | 2026-08-01 | Fact-based follow-up |
 
-## Risk summary
+### Risk summary
 
 - **Tier 1 (systemic)**: HD03253 transposition delay → EU infringement exposure; HD01FiU23 Riksbank independence debate.
 - **Tier 2 (political)**: HD03252 ECHR/ECtHR rights challenge; drivmedel climate framing by S/V/MP.
@@ -69,7 +68,7 @@ On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a **four-bill pre-election deliv
 
 **Evidence base**: 19 primary-source Riksdag documents + cross-type patterns from 4 sibling folders. Single-source dependency mitigated by cross-validation with `sibling executive-brief.md`s and stakeholder role-verification. See `methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 compliance audit`.
 
-## 🧠 Confidence & assumptions
+### 🧠 Confidence & assumptions
 
 - **HIGH (A1)**: Document identity, filings, party attribution, committee routing.
 - **MEDIUM (B2)**: Pre-election-sprint narrative framing (strategic interpretation).
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a **four-bill pre-election deliv
 
 **Key assumption (flagged for next-cycle check per `methodology-reflection.md`)**: That the Tidö coalition's summer-recess timetable holds — if a coalition crisis emerges (e.g. L–KD on HD03252 proportionality), the sprint collapses into autumn, reshaping the election framing.
 
-## 🔗 Companion files
+### 🔗 Companion files
 
 - [synthesis-summary.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md) — integrated picture
 - [intelligence-assessment.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md) — Key Judgments + PIRs (ICD-203)
@@ -88,14 +87,13 @@ On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a **four-bill pre-election deliv
 - [methodology-reflection.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md) — run-audit + ICD 203 compliance
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)_
-
-## Lead story (decision-grade)
+### Lead story (decision-grade)
 
 > The Kristersson government on 2026-04-24 simultaneously advanced a **four-bill legislative package** (detainee benefits, EU banking, tachograph enforcement, debt review), received **five committee reports** clustering its Tidö pre-election signals (prisons, migration, Riksbank, ILO, EV), and fielded **16 opposition interpellations** — while SD filed **zero counter-motions** against any of the 9 open government bills. This is the profile of a coalition entering **pre-election delivery mode** roughly 16 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election, with the SD party-of-confidence remaining structurally disciplined and S concentrating opposition firepower on economic wedges rather than identity politics.
 
-## DIW-weighted ranking (cross-type, top 10)
+### DIW-weighted ranking (cross-type, top 10)
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Type | DIW | Theme | Admiralty | Source folder |
 |------|--------|------|-----|-------|-----------|---------------|
@@ -112,9 +110,9 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Sensitivity**: Ranking robust under ±1 DIW tier perturbation. HD03253 and HD03252 remain co-leaders under any sensible re-weighting because both carry systemic-grade exposure (one fiscal, one rights-based).
 
-## Integrated intelligence picture
+### Integrated intelligence picture
 
-### Thematic convergence
+#### Thematic convergence
 
 Today's 45 active documents cluster into **four coherent narrative threads** that together describe the Tidö coalition's final pre-election positioning:
 
@@ -123,13 +121,13 @@ Today's 45 active documents cluster into **four coherent narrative threads** tha
 3. **Migration and labour** — HD01SfU23 (study/research permit bifurcation), HD01AU15 (ILO ratification). The coalition is threading a needle — tightening on irregular migration while loosening on highly-skilled arrivals. Bifurcation is a concession to M's business-vote flank over SD's closed-border preference.
 4. **Opposition counter-choreography** — 20 motions concentrated on drivmedel (FiU), utvisning (SfU), and krigsmateriel (UU); 16 interpellations 75% S-filed. The opposition is running a *three-party division-of-labour* — S holds the economic centre, V holds the rights-flank, MP holds foreign policy — with C on procedural tightening only.
 
-### Cross-type signals
+#### Cross-type signals
 
 - **Prop → Motion → Committee → Interpellation pipeline** is unusually complete today: HD03252 (prop) will generate JuU counter-motion(s) by 8 May, then the JuU betänkande, then interpellation debate. The full legislative arc is visible.
 - **SD silence** is the single most structurally revealing signal. Zero motions against 9 props means SD will vote the Tidö line on all current bills — closing the right-flank escape route for opposition messaging.
 - **S economic-wedge concentration** (drivmedel + sick-pay + Riksbank critique) signals S has decided the 2026 campaign will be fought on *cost of living and SME resilience* rather than migration or identity.
 
-## Mermaid — cross-type narrative architecture
+### Mermaid — cross-type narrative architecture
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -166,7 +164,7 @@ flowchart LR
   classDef outcome fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## AI-recommended article metadata
+### AI-recommended article metadata
 
 - **EN headline (72 chars)**: "Tidö's pre-election sprint: banks, prisons, detainees, and SD silence"
 - **SV headline (74 chars)**: "Tidöregeringens valspurt: banker, fängelser, häkten — och SD:s tystnad"
@@ -174,7 +172,7 @@ flowchart LR
 - **SV meta description (158 chars)**: "Regeringen driver fyra propositioner och fem betänkanden; oppositionen lämnar 20 motioner på 72 timmar — SD noll. Kvällsanalys av valspurtens politiska arkitektur."
 - **Primary keywords**: Tidöavtalet, Riksdagen 2026, EU bankpaket CRR3, säkerhetsförvaring, drivmedelsskatt, Patrik Lundqvist, Ulf Kristersson, Niklas Wykman, Gunnar Strömmer, SD-disciplin, valet 2026.
 
-## Confidence & uncertainty
+### Confidence & uncertainty
 
 - **HIGH (A1)**: Document identity, authors, effective dates, filings, committee routing, SD zero-count.
 - **MEDIUM (B2)**: Pre-election-sprint narrative (SAT used: **Key Assumptions Check** + **Red-Team challenge** in `devils-advocate.md`).
@@ -186,61 +184,58 @@ flowchart LR
 - PIR-2: Will any L minister publicly dissent on HD03252 proportionality before 2026-05-31?
 - PIR-3: Will S escalate HD10447 to a motion/budget amendment after Busch's 2026-05-07 answer?
 
-## Tradecraft summary
+### Tradecraft summary
 
 - **ICD 203** applied: sources characterised, confidence labelled, alternative hypotheses entertained (`devils-advocate.md`), key assumptions identified (`methodology-reflection.md`).
 - **Admiralty 6×6**: every evidence row annotated; source diversity ≥ 3 for P0/P1 claims (cross-validated across sibling folders).
 - **SATs invoked**: ACH (in `devils-advocate.md`), Red-Team (scenario S4 in `scenario-analysis.md`), Key Assumptions Check, Outside-In (`comparative-international.md`).
 - **Neutrality arithmetic**: Each of the 8 parties is named and treated by observable action — Regeringspartier (M, KD, L) as bill-drivers, SD by its zero motions, S/V/MP/C by their filed motions and interpellations.
 
-_Source: cross-reads of `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions|motions|committeeReports|interpellations/synthesis-summary.md` + `intelligence-assessment.md` + `executive-brief.md`._
-
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling · **Classification**: Public OSINT · **ICD 203 compliant**
 **Confidence framework**: VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / VERY LOW (5-level Admiralty-aligned)
 **Tradecraft**: ICD 203 Standards 1–9; Kent Scale (WEP); SATs (ACH, Red Team, Key Assumptions Check)
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### KJ-1 — Pre-election legacy sprint is the dominant organizing logic
+#### KJ-1 — Pre-election legacy sprint is the dominant organizing logic
 **Confidence: HIGH (B2)**
 
 The simultaneous tabling of four propositions (HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104), landing of five committee reports (HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29), and absorption of 16 opposition interpellations on a single reporting day is **highly likely** a coordinated pre-election positioning sprint rather than a coincidence of the Riksdag calendar. **Indicators**: (a) all four propositions signed personally by PM Kristersson; (b) hard effective dates front-loaded into summer 2026 (1 Jul — HD03256; 1 Aug — HD03252); (c) Finance Minister Wykman leads two of four bills, concentrating fiscal-credibility messaging; (d) Tidöavtalet framing explicitly present in committee-report clustering (CU25 prisons + SfU23 migration). **Alternative considered** (`devils-advocate.md` H1): random calendar clustering — rejected because the effective-date alignment to September 2026 election cycle is too structurally precise for chance.
 
-### KJ-2 — SD party-of-confidence discipline is structurally intact
+#### KJ-2 — SD party-of-confidence discipline is structurally intact
 **Confidence: VERY HIGH (A1)**
 
 SD filed **zero** counter-motions against any of the nine active government propositions in the 72-hour filing window (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17). This is **highly likely** (Kent Scale: ≥ 85%) a signal that SD will vote the Tidö line on all current bills through summer recess. **Indicators**: (a) primary-source count from riksdagen.se motion index — A1; (b) consistent with SD's pattern since Tidöavtalet (2022): fewer than 5 counter-motions against government bills across the 2022–2026 mandate; (c) no public SD parliamentary-group dissent recorded in the past 30 days. **Forward linkage**: PIR-4 monitors SD on HD03252 proportionality debate in JuU — a late dissent would force immediate KJ revision.
 
-### KJ-3 — S has decided the 2026 campaign is an economic campaign
+#### KJ-3 — S has decided the 2026 campaign is an economic campaign
 **Confidence: HIGH (B2)**
 
 Filing 12 of 16 interpellations (75%) in the HD10428–HD10447 window and leading the drivmedel counter-motion (HD024082) while **not** filing on krigsmateriel (MP-only, HD024096) is **likely** (Kent Scale: 55–70%) evidence that S's pre-election war-planning has pivoted away from migration/identity politics toward **cost of living, SME resilience, and fiscal critique**. **Indicators**: HD10447 lead dok explicitly reopens the 2024 sick-pay reimbursement decision; S motions cluster in FiU (fiscal) rather than JuU (justice). **Alternative considered**: S is splitting the issue-space with V/MP (division of labour rather than genuine pivot) — partially true but not mutually exclusive with the primary judgment.
 
-### KJ-4 — HD03253 (EU Banking) carries the highest latent transposition risk
+#### KJ-4 — HD03253 (EU Banking) carries the highest latent transposition risk
 **Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)**
 
 **Possible** (Kent Scale: 30–45%) that Sweden misses the CRR3/CRD6 transposition deadline if FiU does not schedule first hearing by 2026-05-15 (PIR-1). **Indicators**: EU deadline pressure; Swedish big-4 bank RWA concerns slow political process; QIS studies not yet published by Finansinspektionen. Mitigating factors: Wykman is a technocratic finance minister with EU-law experience; FiU's 2026 agenda has bandwidth after summer recess. **See** `scenario-analysis.md §Scenario S3`.
 
-### KJ-5 — HD03252 (detainee benefits) carries the highest rights-litigation risk
+#### KJ-5 — HD03252 (detainee benefits) carries the highest rights-litigation risk
 **Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)**
 
 **Likely** (Kent Scale: 55–70%) that HD03252 will face an ECHR Article 3 / Article 8 challenge within 18 months of entry into force (1 Aug 2026). **Indicators**: (a) ECtHR case law on detainee conditions (e.g. *Khlaifia v. Italy*, *Muršić v. Croatia*) establishes a low threshold for collective rights restrictions; (b) V filed HD024095 seeking full avslag on a related utvisning bill — signalling a ready legal-advocacy ecosystem; (c) absence of a formal Justitieombudsmannen pre-assessment. **Not alternative to KJ-1**: an ECtHR challenge would not necessarily derail the bill's enactment; it would reshape the 2027+ political framing.
 
-### KJ-6 — L (Liberals) has structurally exited the lead ministry pool for the remainder of the mandate
+#### KJ-6 — L (Liberals) has structurally exited the lead ministry pool for the remainder of the mandate
 **Confidence: HIGH (B2)**
 
 **Likely** (Kent Scale: 55–70%) that L will not regain a lead ministerial role on any new Tidö bill before September 2026. **Indicators**: (a) today's 4-bill batch has zero L-lead ministers; (b) L has held fewer lead roles each quarter since the 2024–25 coalition strain over criminal-justice proportionality; (c) L's internal polling pressure on civil liberty flank (including HD03252). **Implication**: L will seek differentiation via constitutional-committee work rather than ministerial delivery — shifts where pre-election dissent will appear.
 
-### KJ-7 — The Riksbank independence debate has re-emerged as a sleeper controversy
+#### KJ-7 — The Riksbank independence debate has re-emerged as a sleeper controversy
 **Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)**
 
 **Possible** (Kent Scale: 30–45%) that HD01FiU23 (Riksbank annual review) will escalate into a public debate on Riksbank independence after 2024–25 balance-sheet losses. **Indicators**: (a) the 2022 Sveriges Riksbank Act overhaul is still within its first-five-years review window; (b) SD has previously expressed interest in political oversight of Riksbank; (c) FiU23 is a standing annual review but the 2026 iteration has unusually thick pre-reading bandwidth. This is the most latent, but highest-optionality, institutional risk in the set.
 
-## Confidence distribution
+### Confidence distribution
 
 | Confidence | Count | KJ IDs |
 |------------|-------|--------|
@@ -252,7 +247,7 @@ Filing 12 of 16 interpellations (75%) in the HD10428–HD10447 window and leadin
 
 **Source diversity check** (ICD 203 Standard 2): every KJ cites ≥ 2 independent sources (sibling folder corroboration + primary Riksdag document). Single-source dependencies flagged in individual KJs are candidates for next-cycle PIR follow-up.
 
-## PIRs for next cycle
+### PIRs for next cycle
 
 | PIR | Question | Trigger | Deadline | Owner |
 |-----|----------|---------|----------|-------|
@@ -270,7 +265,7 @@ Standing PIRs (always-on, per `osint-tradecraft-standards.md §PIR handoff`):
 - **Standing PIR-B**: Election-cycle wedge escalations (any party escalating beyond normal parliamentary tools)
 - **Standing PIR-C**: ECHR / ECtHR filings against Swedish law
 
-## Prior-cycle PIR ingestion (Tier-C requirement)
+### Prior-cycle PIR ingestion (Tier-C requirement)
 
 Carried forward from sibling folders' intelligence-assessments (2026-04-24 morning runs):
 
@@ -282,7 +277,7 @@ Carried forward from sibling folders' intelligence-assessments (2026-04-24 morni
 
 All inherited PIRs have been incorporated; no orphan PIRs from the 7-day lookback window remain unaddressed.
 
-## Key Assumptions Check (ICD 203 Standard 3)
+### Key Assumptions Check (ICD 203 Standard 3)
 
 | # | Assumption | Evidence strength | Fragility |
 |---|-----------|-------------------|-----------|
@@ -292,7 +287,7 @@ All inherited PIRs have been incorporated; no orphan PIRs from the 7-day lookbac
 | 4 | Opposition inter-party coordination is real (S+V+MP on drivmedel) | MEDIUM — three motions filed within 72h window | MEDIUM — may be independent convergence |
 | 5 | Kriminalvården can scale capacity per plan | LOW — history of capacity slippage | HIGH |
 
-## Source characterisation (ICD 203 Standard 2)
+### Source characterisation (ICD 203 Standard 2)
 
 - **Primary (A1)**: Riksdag open data (data.riksdagen.se) — definitive for document identity and filings
 - **Secondary (A1–A2)**: Regeringen pressroom (regeringen.se) — definitive for ministerial signings
@@ -301,7 +296,7 @@ All inherited PIRs have been incorporated; no orphan PIRs from the 7-day lookbac
 
 No single-source-of-concern dependency (ICD 203 Standard 4 satisfied).
 
-## ICD 203 Standards checklist
+### ICD 203 Standards checklist
 
 | # | Standard | Status |
 |---|----------|--------|
@@ -315,16 +310,13 @@ No single-source-of-concern dependency (ICD 203 Standard 4 satisfied).
 | 8 | Distinguishes assumptions from judgments | ✅ Key Assumptions Check table above |
 | 9 | Incorporates alternative analysis | ✅ `devils-advocate.md` with 3 competing hypotheses |
 
-_Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling intelligence-assessments; ICD 203 framework per `analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md`._
-
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling · **Framework**: DIW (Decision-Information-Worth) weighting per `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 4`
 **Scale**: 1.0 (Surface / L1) → 4.0 (Intelligence-grade / L3). Weights combine salience × novelty × downstream-dependency × uncertainty-reduction.
 
-## DIW scores per document (top 20, cross-type)
+### DIW scores per document (top 20, cross-type)
 
 | # | dok_id | Type | Committee | DIW | Salience | Novelty | Dependency | Unc-reduction | Tier | Admiralty |
 |---|--------|------|-----------|-----|----------|---------|-----------|---------------|------|-----------|
@@ -349,7 +341,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | 19 | HD10446 | Ip | — | **2.20** | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.5 | L1 | A2 |
 | 20 | HD10445 | Ip | — | **2.20** | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.5 | L1 | A2 |
 
-## Mermaid — significance rank diagram
+### Mermaid — significance rank diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TB
@@ -379,7 +371,7 @@ flowchart TB
   classDef l1 fill:#6a4c93,stroke:#6a4c93,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Sensitivity analysis
+### Sensitivity analysis
 
 | Perturbation | Effect on ranking |
 |--------------|-------------------|
@@ -390,7 +382,7 @@ flowchart TB
 
 **Robustness**: The top-5 DIW ranking (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252, HD01CU25, HD024082) is stable under any ±0.3 perturbation — all lead items remain in the top-5 under sensible re-weighting.
 
-## Rank-ordering logic (ICD 203 Standard 5 — tradecraft transparency)
+### Rank-ordering logic (ICD 203 Standard 5 — tradecraft transparency)
 
 **Salience** — how many stakeholders care today? HD03253 and HD03252 rank top because they generate cross-constituency attention (banks, civil-liberty NGOs, EU institutions, opposition parties).
 
@@ -400,7 +392,7 @@ flowchart TB
 
 **Uncertainty reduction** — does reading this reduce future ambiguity? HD10447 scores top because Minister Busch's response on 2026-05-07 will directly resolve PIR-3.
 
-## Cluster-level scoring (where individual items roll up)
+### Cluster-level scoring (where individual items roll up)
 
 | Cluster | Member dok_ids | Cluster DIW | Rationale |
 |---------|---------------|-------------|-----------|
@@ -409,7 +401,7 @@ flowchart TB
 | S interpellation cluster | HD10428–HD10446 (12 S-filed) | 3.20 | Strategic-pattern weight exceeds any single dok |
 | Krigsmateriel cluster | HD024091 + HD024096 | 2.90 | V+MP with S silence — structurally narrow |
 
-## Why today is a high-DIW day
+### Why today is a high-DIW day
 
 Three factors place today in the **top-5% of reporting-day signal density** for the 2026 mandate period to date:
 
@@ -417,41 +409,38 @@ Three factors place today in the **top-5% of reporting-day signal density** for
 2. Full legislative-arc visibility (prop → motion → bet → ip on the same cycle) is rare.
 3. SD's zero motions on 9 bills is itself a high-DIW "null-event" signal — the **dog that did not bark** is informative.
 
-_Source: sibling folder significance-scoring.md files + cross-type DIW re-weighting per `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §DIW Output Matrix`._
-
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: Analyze how today's legislative batch is likely to be framed across major Swedish media categories and what this implies for narrative contestation.
 
-## Expected framing by outlet category
+### Expected framing by outlet category
 
-### Public-service (SVT, SR, DN public-facing)
+#### Public-service (SVT, SR, DN public-facing)
 - **Likely frame**: "Riksdagen behandlade fyra viktiga förslag" — procedurally balanced coverage
 - **Emphasis**: HD03252 and HD01CU25 will receive prominent coverage as most newsworthy
 - **Risk**: Proportionality framing on HD03252 — likely to be cautious/balanced
 
-### Major morning papers (Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet)
+#### Major morning papers (Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet)
 - **DN likely frame**: Rights-centric on HD03252; technocratic on HD03253; business-section on banking
 - **SvD likely frame**: Economic-competence framing on HD03253; fiscal-credibility framing on HD03104; business section for banking + SME sick-pay
 - **Divergence**: DN emphasizes rights/governance; SvD emphasizes fiscal/institutional
 
-### Tabloids (Aftonbladet, Expressen)
+#### Tabloids (Aftonbladet, Expressen)
 - **Aftonbladet likely frame**: "Regeringen försämrar levnadsvillkor för dömda" — rights framing; SME sick-pay as welfare story
 - **Expressen likely frame**: "Tidöavtalet levererar" — coalition-delivery framing; cost-of-living framed as opposition weakness
 - **Divergence**: Sharp — these outlets anchor opposition and coalition narratives respectively
 
-### Business press (Affärsvärlden, Veckans Affärer)
+#### Business press (Affärsvärlden, Veckans Affärer)
 - **Frame**: HD03253 + HD01FiU23 take center stage; political framing ignored
 - **Emphasis**: Bank RWA impact; Riksbank annual review; Swedish financial-supervisory stance
 
-### Partisan/campaign media (various)
+#### Partisan/campaign media (various)
 - **S-aligned framing**: Cost-of-living; SME workers; drivmedel as "regressive"
 - **M/coalition-aligned framing**: Discipline + delivery; EU compliance; capacity expansion
 - **SD-aligned framing**: Migration + rights-restriction victories; the interpellation storm as opposition weakness signals
 
-## Framing contest on HD03252
+### Framing contest on HD03252
 
 Critical contested story. Expected framings:
 
@@ -466,7 +455,7 @@ Critical contested story. Expected framings:
 
 **Framing-battle prediction**: 5–10 days of contested framing; dominant national frame will be somewhere between "stramare åtgärder" (neutral-government-leaning) and "proportionalitetsfråga" (neutral-rights-leaning). Aftonbladet and Expressen poles rarely capture majority framing in Swedish public discourse.
 
-## Framing contest on HD03253
+### Framing contest on HD03253
 
 Less contested. Technocratic dominance likely:
 - Business press: "CRR3/CRD6 transposition announced" — factual
@@ -474,7 +463,7 @@ Less contested. Technocratic dominance likely:
 - Tabloids: Minimal coverage (low newsworthiness)
 - Political framing risk: SD could frame as "EU overreach" — low probability given SD's pro-coalition position today
 
-## Framing contest on HD10447
+### Framing contest on HD10447
 
 S's most successful lever. Expected framings:
 - Aftonbladet: "Företag tvingas betala för sjuka anställda" — sympathetic to SME narrative
@@ -484,7 +473,7 @@ S's most successful lever. Expected framings:
 
 **Framing-battle prediction**: S will gain narrative ground if Busch's 2026-05-07 response is pure refusal. If Busch offers any compromise or review, framing neutralizes.
 
-## Narrative dominance matrix
+### Narrative dominance matrix
 
 | Narrative | Coalition-favourable | Opposition-favourable |
 |-----------|----------------------|------------------------|
@@ -497,11 +486,11 @@ S's most successful lever. Expected framings:
 
 Net media-framing advantage over the next 14 days: **narrowly opposition-favourable** on volume (cost-of-living narrative has Segment F pull); **narrowly coalition-favourable** on institutional credibility.
 
-## Framing-to-polling conversion
+### Framing-to-polling conversion
 
 Historically, a 14-day dominant media frame shifts polling by approximately 0.5–1.5 pp in the favoured party. Today's contested framing batch could produce a **0.5–1.0 pp net shift** toward opposition on cost-of-living, partially offset by **0.3–0.5 pp** coalition shift on institutional credibility. **Net expected shift: 0.0 to +0.5 pp toward opposition** over 14 days.
 
-## Journalism quality and ICD 203 source-evaluation
+### Journalism quality and ICD 203 source-evaluation
 
 This analysis is framed-prediction, not primary-observation. Sources:
 - Content analysis from sibling folder media-framing-analysis files
@@ -510,16 +499,13 @@ This analysis is framed-prediction, not primary-observation. Sources:
 
 **Admiralty code for framings above**: B2 (reliable source category, but framed prediction, not observation).
 
-_Source: Synthesis of sibling media-framing artifacts + journalism-coverage-pattern base rates._
-
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Framework**: 6-lens stakeholder matrix per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 5`.
 Lenses: Government · Opposition · Civil society · Industry / market · Administrative / expert · International.
 
-## Matrix
+### Matrix
 
 | Lens | Key actors today | Reading of the day | Prevailing frame | Evidence |
 |------|-------------------|---------------------|------------------|----------|
@@ -530,33 +516,33 @@ Lenses: Government · Opposition · Civil society · Industry / market · Admini
 | **Administrative / expert** | Kriminalvården (capacity); Migrationsverket (bifurcation); Riksbank (FiU23); Finansinspektionen (CRR3) | "Three of four top bills land directly on administrative agencies — capacity is the binding constraint, not politics." | *Political ambition must match operational capacity* | CU25 capacity concerns; SfU23 bifurcation operationalization |
 | **International / EU** | EU Commission (banking + migration); Council of Europe / ECtHR (detainee conditions); Nordic peers (DK/NO/FI parallel tracks) | "EU prudential file is on the critical path; ECHR watchdogs are priming challenges; Nordic comparators observe Sweden's detainee-rights experiment." | *Sweden sets, then sometimes corrects, Nordic norms* | CRR3 EU calendar; ECtHR Article 3 case law |
 
-## Role-playing exercises
+### Role-playing exercises
 
-### Red team perspective — opposition strategy operator
+#### Red team perspective — opposition strategy operator
 
 > *"We've chosen our ground. Drivmedel is our pre-election anchor because it translates trivially to household budgets; HD10447 is our strategic reopening of the 2024 sick-pay fight; and we refuse to engage on krigsmateriel or utvisning because those are ideological traps. Let V/MP/C signal-differentiate on rights; we own the wallet."*
 
 This reading is consistent with S filing the sole drivmedel motion (HD024082) and leading 12/16 interpellations in one window — a **strategic concentration**, not a shotgun approach.
 
-### Red team perspective — PMO chief of staff
+#### Red team perspective — PMO chief of staff
 
 > *"Four bills, two weeks of session left before summer recess, all signed by the PM personally. Message: the government has delivered. SD filed nothing. L is quiet. The interpellation storm is routine opposition theatre — we respond within rules. The one landmine is HD03252: if L blinks in JuU on proportionality, we lose our coalition-discipline narrative. We watch L, not S."*
 
 This reading is consistent with the observed ministerial signing pattern and the lack of any L-lead ministry in today's batch.
 
-### Red team perspective — Civil Rights Defenders counsel
+#### Red team perspective — Civil Rights Defenders counsel
 
 > *"HD03252 is a ECHR Article 3 / Article 8 test case waiting to happen. We coordinate with Amnesty SE and Advokatsamfundet. We file an amicus brief before third reading. We prepare litigation readiness for Q4 2026. We do not over-mobilize now — we let V carry the parliamentary fight and we win the courtroom fight."*
 
 This reading predicts a 12–18-month latency between bill enactment (Aug 2026) and the first substantive ECtHR filing (est. 2027–2028).
 
-### Red team perspective — banking sector CRO
+#### Red team perspective — banking sector CRO
 
 > *"CRR3/CRD6 transposition could add 15–35 bps to our RWA. We cannot tolerate a late or overzealous Swedish transposition. We brief FiU, we brief Finansinspektionen, we publish our own QIS. We push for a minimal-transposition, straight-EU-compliance approach. We treat HD03253 as operationally urgent even if politically quiet."*
 
 This reading explains why HD03253 carries such high DIW despite low public controversy — the markets and regulators treat it as priority-1.
 
-## Cross-stakeholder tension map
+### Cross-stakeholder tension map
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -583,7 +569,7 @@ flowchart LR
   class EU,ECHR intl
 ```
 
-## Stakeholder pressure weight summary
+### Stakeholder pressure weight summary
 
 For each top-5 dok_id, weighted sum of aligned-vs-opposed stakeholders:
 
@@ -595,17 +581,14 @@ For each top-5 dok_id, weighted sum of aligned-vs-opposed stakeholders:
 | HD01CU25 | Gov + CivSoc (on standards) | Admin (capacity concerns) | +1 | Passage with amendments |
 | HD024082 | S + V + MP + consumers | Gov + M-KD-L | 0 | Defeated in plenum but wedge value retained |
 
-_Source: sibling folder stakeholder-perspectives.md + synthesis of industry-briefing precedent._
-
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Four-horizon dated-indicator system per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 10`.
 **Horizons**: T+7 days · T+30 days · T+90 days · T+12 months.
 **Indicator types**: Calendar-anchored · Event-triggered · Threshold-triggered.
 
-## T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)
+### T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Expected signal | Interpretation if YES | Interpretation if NO |
 |---|-----------|---------|------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
@@ -613,7 +596,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | F2 | DN/SvD editorial on HD03252 | editorial publication | Proportionality framing | Framing contest live | Coalition framing dominant |
 | F3 | Aftonbladet front-page on SME sick-pay | front page | HD10447 narrative amplification | S wedge traction | Wedge contained |
 
-## T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)
+### T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Expected signal | Interpretation if YES | Interpretation if NO |
 |---|-----------|---------|------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
@@ -623,7 +606,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | F7 | Kriminalvården monthly capacity update | end of May publication | Capacity trend | On-track | PIR-5 pre-flag |
 | F8 | FiU schedule HD03253 (PIR-1) | 2026-05-15 deadline | Scheduling event | S1 reinforced | S3 activated |
 
-## T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)
+### T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Expected signal | Interpretation if YES | Interpretation if NO |
 |---|-----------|---------|------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
@@ -634,7 +617,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | F13 | ECHR filing signal on HD03252 | post-enactment | Filing preliminaries | R2 activated | Latent remains |
 | F14 | SD 30-day motion-filing rate | rolling | Coalition discipline index | < 2 motions = S1 | > 3 motions = signal |
 
-## T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)
+### T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)
 
 | # | Indicator | Trigger | Expected signal | Interpretation |
 |---|-----------|---------|------------------|-----------------|
@@ -645,7 +628,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | F19 | SME sick-pay legislation under new government? | post-election | Legislative proposal | Post-S1 or post-S2 directly |
 | F20 | Riksbank-independence debate escalation | ongoing | Institutional debate | Black-swan latent |
 
-## Indicator priority ranking
+### Indicator priority ranking
 
 **Tier-1 (decision-forcing, < 30 days)**:
 - F4 (Busch response 2026-05-07)
@@ -662,7 +645,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 - F15 (election outcome)
 - F16-F20 (post-election)
 
-## Calendar placement
+### Calendar placement
 
 ```mermaid
 gantt
@@ -685,7 +668,7 @@ gantt
   ECHR preliminary filing  :f17, 2027-04-01, 90d
 ```
 
-## Indicator-to-PIR mapping
+### Indicator-to-PIR mapping
 
 | Forward Indicator | Linked PIR |
 |-------------------|------------|
@@ -699,7 +682,7 @@ gantt
 | F16 | PIR-1 final resolution |
 | F20 | PIR-7 |
 
-## Null-indicator watch
+### Null-indicator watch
 
 Three **absence** signals to monitor (dog-that-did-not-bark):
 
@@ -707,7 +690,7 @@ Three **absence** signals to monitor (dog-that-did-not-bark):
 - **L silence on HD03252**: if L declines public comment for 30 days, coalition internal-management succeeded
 - **MP silence on drivmedel**: if MP joins drivmedel cluster (currently S-led), opposition consolidation sharpened
 
-## Monitoring cadence
+### Monitoring cadence
 
 - **Daily**: F1-F3 (T+7 watch)
 - **Weekly**: F4-F8 + null-indicators
@@ -715,19 +698,16 @@ Three **absence** signals to monitor (dog-that-did-not-bark):
 - **Monthly**: F9-F14 comprehensive review
 - **Quarterly**: F15-F20 strategic review
 
-_Source: Synthesis of sibling forward-indicators artifacts; calendar-anchoring per published Riksdag session plan._
-
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Three-scenario baseline + branching (ICD 203 Standard 9 — alternative analysis)
 **Horizon**: T+30 days (pre-summer-recess) → T+4 months (early election campaign) → T+12 months (post-election)
 **Baseline date**: 2026-04-24
 
-## Scenario set (probabilities sum to 1.00)
+### Scenario set (probabilities sum to 1.00)
 
-### Scenario S1 — "Sprint succeeds, coalition consolidates" (Prob: 0.50)
+#### Scenario S1 — "Sprint succeeds, coalition consolidates" (Prob: 0.50)
 
 **Storyline**: All 4 propositions pass committee by mid-June, floor by end-June. HD03253 transposition schedule holds. HD01CU25 Kriminalvården Q2 report shows on-plan capacity. SD maintains zero-motion discipline through summer. L publicly supports HD03252 after a cosmetic proportionality amendment. S's cost-of-living campaign gains traction in July but coalition responds with a pre-recess communication package. The Tidö coalition enters summer recess with a delivery-legacy narrative largely intact.
 
@@ -739,7 +719,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Falsifiers**: Any of the four signposts fails → downgrade to S2.
 
-### Scenario S2 — "Wedge works, opposition gains ground" (Prob: 0.35)
+#### Scenario S2 — "Wedge works, opposition gains ground" (Prob: 0.35)
 
 **Storyline**: S's HD10447 + drivmedel combination gains media traction during May. Minister Busch gives a flat-footed response. Q2 Kriminalvården capacity data disappoints. Polling shifts 3–5pp toward S–V–MP bloc by August. Coalition still holds formally but loses pre-election momentum. HD03252 passes with minor amendment but faces first ECHR filing signal in Q4. HD03253 transposition slips to autumn session.
 
@@ -751,7 +731,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Falsifiers**: Coalition response to the above blunts wedge → upgrade back to S1 (conditional).
 
-### Scenario S3 — "Institutional stress — EU deadline slips + L fracture" (Prob: 0.12)
+#### Scenario S3 — "Institutional stress — EU deadline slips + L fracture" (Prob: 0.12)
 
 **Storyline**: HD03253 FiU schedule slips past 2026-05-15. Summer recess consumed. Autumn session rushed. L publicly dissents on HD03252 proportionality, forcing a coalition crisis-management episode in JuU. SD silence broken by an unexpected counter-signal on detainee benefits. Opposition unity strengthens. Coalition enters election campaign with fractured L flank, late EU-banking transposition, and one ECHR filing.
 
@@ -763,7 +743,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Falsifiers**: L internal resolution on HD03252 → conditional downgrade.
 
-### Scenario S4 — "Black swan — Riksbank independence flashpoint" (Prob: 0.03)
+#### Scenario S4 — "Black swan — Riksbank independence flashpoint" (Prob: 0.03)
 
 **Storyline**: HD01FiU23 debate takes an unexpected turn with SD or KD raising a political-oversight proposal. Media frames as "government challenges Riksbank". Markets respond with currency volatility. Opposition pivots to constitutional-defender narrative. Coalition dominates the news cycle for the wrong reason. All other bills become secondary.
 
@@ -774,7 +754,7 @@ _Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Falsifiers**: HD01FiU23 passes as routine annual review.
 
-## Scenario tree diagram
+### Scenario tree diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -798,7 +778,7 @@ flowchart LR
   class S4 s4
 ```
 
-## Probability rationale
+### Probability rationale
 
 | Scenario | Prior | Evidence pull | Posterior |
 |----------|-------|---------------|-----------|
@@ -808,7 +788,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | S4 | 0.05 | −no current catalyst visible | 0.03 |
 | **Sum** | **1.00** | | **1.00** ✅ |
 
-## Implications by scenario
+### Implications by scenario
 
 | Scenario | Implication for coalition | Implication for opposition | Implication for markets | Implication for civil society |
 |----------|---------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------|
@@ -817,7 +797,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | S3 | Crisis management | Windfall | High volatility; bank equities weak | Accelerated ECHR prep |
 | S4 | Worst case; crisis | Windfall; constitutional frame | High SEK/bond volatility | Neutral (institutional, not rights) |
 
-## Cross-scenario monitoring plan
+### Cross-scenario monitoring plan
 
 **Week of 2026-04-28**: FiU agenda publication (HD03253 scheduling) — binary signal for S1 vs S3.
 **Week of 2026-05-05**: Minister Busch response on HD10447 — signal for S1 vs S2.
@@ -825,15 +805,12 @@ flowchart LR
 **Week of 2026-06-09**: JuU passage of HD03252 — signal on L flank.
 **Week of 2026-06-23**: Kriminalvården Q2 capacity report — S1 stability signal.
 
-_Source: cross-scenario synthesis of sibling scenario analyses; Bayesian re-weighting of priors based on today's signals._
-
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Framework**: 5-dimension risk register (Political × Legal × Operational × Financial × Reputational) with L×I (Likelihood × Impact) scoring on a 1–5 scale.
 
-## Risk register (ranked by L×I)
+### Risk register (ranked by L×I)
 
 | ID | Risk | Dimensions | L | I | L×I | Mitigation / monitor | Linked dok_ids |
 |----|------|------------|---|---|-----|-----------------------|-----------------|
@@ -853,7 +830,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R14 | Summer-recess schedule compression — bills rushed | Operational × Legal | 3 | 3 | 9 | Earlier committee scheduling | HD03253, HD03252 |
 | R15 | Interpellation backlog → administrative fatigue | Operational | 3 | 2 | 6 | Minister response triage | HD10428–47 |
 
-## Heat map (L × I)
+### Heat map (L × I)
 
 ```
         I=1   I=2   I=3   I=4   I=5
@@ -869,52 +846,49 @@ L=1      ·     ·     ·     ·     ·
 - **Sleeper cell (L=2, I=4–5)**: R1, R5, R8 — low-likelihood but catastrophic-if-triggered institutional risks.
 - **Chronic cell (L≥3, I=3)**: R6, R7, R14 — ongoing political/operational threats requiring sustained monitoring.
 
-## Top-5 risk deep dives
+### Top-5 risk deep dives
 
-### R2 — HD03252 ECHR challenge (L×I = 12)
+#### R2 — HD03252 ECHR challenge (L×I = 12)
 
 **Pathway**: Bill passes → enters force 2026-08-01 → first operational incident Q4 2026 → domestic court appeals → ECtHR filing Q2–Q4 2027 → judgment 2028–2029.
 **Early signals**: NGO statements within 30 days of promulgation; academic-commentary pattern.
 **Mitigation**: A formal proportionality clause added before third reading.
 
-### R3 — Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss (L×I = 12)
+#### R3 — Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss (L×I = 12)
 
 **Pathway**: HD01CU25 sets capacity baseline → Q2 actual falls short → HD03252 operational impacts amplify → legal exposure under R2 compounds.
 **Early signals**: PIR-5 Q2 report.
 **Mitigation**: Pre-emptive Kriminalvården communication on capacity realism.
 
-### R6 — S cost-of-living campaign traction (L×I = 12)
+#### R6 — S cost-of-living campaign traction (L×I = 12)
 
 **Pathway**: S HD10447 traction during May → drivmedel cluster gains summer salience → pre-election polling shift by August.
 **Early signals**: DN/SvD editorial alignment by 2026-05-15; YouGov/Novus polling shift.
 **Mitigation**: Coalition positive-agenda launch.
 
-### R1 — CRR3/CRD6 transposition miss (L×I = 10)
+#### R1 — CRR3/CRD6 transposition miss (L×I = 10)
 
 **Pathway**: FiU fails to schedule by 2026-05-15 → summer recess consumed → autumn rush → incomplete transposition by 2027 deadline → EU infraction.
 **Early signals**: PIR-1 FiU calendar.
 
-### R14 — Summer-recess compression (L×I = 9)
+#### R14 — Summer-recess compression (L×I = 9)
 
 **Pathway**: 4 bills + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations = high schedule compression → substantive debate quality degrades.
 **Early signals**: Any bill withdrawn or postponed from committee in May 2026.
 
-## Aggregate risk posture
+### Aggregate risk posture
 
 - **Net risk score**: 15 risks × average L×I of 8.3 = **baseline political risk environment: ELEVATED**
 - **Direction of change vs prior 7 days** (from sibling risk-assessments): ↑ +1 quintile — driven by simultaneous legal+operational+financial triple.
 - **Heat cell concentration**: 2 risks in the (3,4)-(4,4) quadrant — both on HD03252.
 
-_Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling risk-assessment.md files._
-
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Kent-SWOT with TOWS matrix per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 6`.
 Actor of analysis: **The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)** as it approaches September 2026 election.
 
-## Strengths
+### Strengths
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence (dok_id) |
 |---|----------|-------------------|
@@ -924,7 +898,7 @@ Actor of analysis: **The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)*
 | S4 | Personal PM signature on all four props — concentrates credibility | Signing block on HD03252/253/256/3104 |
 | S5 | Administrative capacity backbone — Kriminalvården Q2 reporting | HD01CU25 |
 
-## Weaknesses
+### Weaknesses
 
 | # | Weakness | Evidence (dok_id) |
 |---|----------|-------------------|
@@ -934,7 +908,7 @@ Actor of analysis: **The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)*
 | W4 | Kriminalvården capacity plan unproven against demand curve | CU25 subtext |
 | W5 | No positive agenda on cost-of-living — exposed to S wedge | HD024082 + HD10447 |
 
-## Opportunities
+### Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Evidence / path |
 |---|-------------|-----------------|
@@ -944,7 +918,7 @@ Actor of analysis: **The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)*
 | O4 | Quiet co-option of MP's krigsmateriel bill (peel ethical voters) | HD024096 (low-cost signal) |
 | O5 | Economic-credibility narrative via skr debt management | HD03104 |
 
-## Threats
+### Threats
 
 | # | Threat | Evidence / trigger |
 |---|--------|---------------------|
@@ -956,14 +930,14 @@ Actor of analysis: **The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)*
 | T6 | Opposition coordination on utvisning/bifurcation | HD024090/95/97, HD01SfU23 |
 | T7 | Late-cycle capacity slippage in Kriminalvården | CU25 operational risk |
 
-## TOWS matrix
+### TOWS matrix
 
 | | Opportunities | Threats |
 |---|---------------|---------|
 | **Strengths** | **SO — Delivery-credibility sprint**: S1/S4 × O1/O3. Finish 4 bills + CU25 Q2 delivery milestone on the same pre-recess timeline. Yields "We deliver" narrative. | **ST — Proportionality defence**: S1 × T1/T4. Leverage parliamentary majority to add a formal proportionality safeguard to HD03252, pre-empting ECHR challenge and L fracture. |
 | **Weaknesses** | **WO — Positive-agenda gap close**: W5 × O5. Use HD03104 debt-management skr as platform for a pre-recess cost-of-living communication push. Partial, but better than silence. | **WT — Defensive containment**: W1/W3 × T2/T3. Accept that HD03253 may slip to autumn; pre-announce a transposition roadmap. On L, pre-emptively float a minor HD03252 amendment to prevent open fracture. |
 
-## TOWS strategic recommendations (for intelligence consumers, not the coalition)
+### TOWS strategic recommendations (for intelligence consumers, not the coalition)
 
 **For parliamentary watchers**:
 - Monitor L's JuU statements on HD03252 for the first-week-of-May proportionality amendment. If L supports amendment, coalition is reinforced; if L opposes, first real fracture of mandate.
@@ -979,22 +953,19 @@ Actor of analysis: **The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)*
 **For opposition analysts**:
 - S has chosen its campaign terrain (economy). V has chosen rights. MP has chosen ethics. C has chosen migration-flank differentiation. **Four separate campaign arcs in one reporting day** — a first in this mandate.
 
-## Net SWOT balance
+### Net SWOT balance
 
 - **Strengths (5) > Weaknesses (5)** but substantively equal — Tidöavtalet delivery is real but fragile.
 - **Opportunities (5) ≈ Threats (7)** — threats narrowly outnumber opportunities.
 - **Net strategic position**: *coalition is delivering on its legacy agenda but accumulating latent risks* — precisely the position a pre-election incumbent adopts when converting political capital to policy durability.
 
-_Source: Kent-SWOT synthesis of all sibling SWOT analyses + cross-type strategic framing._
-
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Political-threat taxonomy + attack-tree per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 8`.
 **Scope**: Threats to democratic accountability, institutional integrity, and rule-of-law durability exposed by today's legislative batch — not security threats to individuals or infrastructure.
 
-## Threat taxonomy
+### Threat taxonomy
 
 | # | Threat class | Manifestation today | Severity | Direction (↑/↓/→) |
 |---|--------------|----------------------|----------|--------------------|
@@ -1007,7 +978,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | T7 | Coalition discipline hardening (SD zero motions) | 9-bill silence | LOW (not a threat today) | ↑ |
 | T8 | Populist media framing of coalition-discipline | "SD vetoes everything" narrative risk | LOW | → |
 
-## Attack tree — "HD03252 becomes a legitimacy-damaging rights case"
+### Attack tree — "HD03252 becomes a legitimacy-damaging rights case"
 
 ```
 ROOT: HD03252 enters force 2026-08-01 and triggers domestic/ECHR challenge
@@ -1029,7 +1000,7 @@ ROOT: HD03252 enters force 2026-08-01 and triggers domestic/ECHR challenge
 
 **Compound probability of adverse ECHR judgment within 30 months**: ≈ 5–9% (0.7 × 0.5 × 0.3). **Low absolute but high-impact.**
 
-## Threat × stakeholder mapping
+### Threat × stakeholder mapping
 
 | Threat | Coalition | Opposition | Civil society | EU | Markets |
 |--------|-----------|------------|----------------|-----|---------|
@@ -1042,13 +1013,13 @@ ROOT: HD03252 enters force 2026-08-01 and triggers domestic/ECHR challenge
 | T7 | Benefits | **Loses** | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral |
 | T8 | Loses slightly | Benefits | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral |
 
-## Asymmetric-threat assessment
+### Asymmetric-threat assessment
 
 Most of today's threats are **structural-institutional** rather than acute. The one acute threat surface is HD03252's rights-regime footprint: a single operational incident in Q3 2026 could catalyze an outsized rights-NGO and international response.
 
 The sleeper asymmetric threat is **T3 (Riksbank independence)**: very low probability in the next quarter, but if activated, would have an outsized effect on Swedish financial-market reputation — a classic black-swan-shaped risk.
 
-## Threat-to-PIR mapping
+### Threat-to-PIR mapping
 
 - T1 → PIR-2 (L fracture) + PIR-4 (SD discipline on HD03252)
 - T2 → Watchlist (HD01SfU23 Q2 audit)
@@ -1059,20 +1030,17 @@ The sleeper asymmetric threat is **T3 (Riksbank independence)**: very low probab
 - T7 → Standing PIR-A (SD motion filings)
 - T8 → N/A (media-framing watchlist only)
 
-## Counter-threat recommendations (for intelligence consumers)
+### Counter-threat recommendations (for intelligence consumers)
 
 - **Parliamentary observers**: Prioritize attention to L in May on HD03252 proportionality; attention to FiU calendar on HD03253.
 - **Market analysts**: Monitor HD03253 transposition timeline + HD01FiU23 speaker list.
 - **Civil-liberty NGOs**: Pre-position legal-readiness for HD03252 ECHR challenge starting 2026-Q4.
 - **EU desk officers**: Track Swedish CRR3 transposition status weekly.
 
-_Source: cross-type synthesis of threat profiles from sibling threat-analysis artifacts._
-
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01CU25
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md -->
 
 See aggregated analysis in:
 - [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)
@@ -1084,8 +1052,7 @@ See aggregated analysis in:
 Primary sibling folder analyses under `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/` carry the single-type deep treatment.
 
 ### HD024082
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024082-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md -->
 
 See aggregated analysis in:
 - [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)
@@ -1097,8 +1064,7 @@ See aggregated analysis in:
 Primary sibling folder analyses under `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/` carry the single-type deep treatment.
 
 ### HD03252
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03252-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03252-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md -->
 
 See aggregated analysis in:
 - [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)
@@ -1110,8 +1076,7 @@ See aggregated analysis in:
 Primary sibling folder analyses under `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/` carry the single-type deep treatment.
 
 ### HD03253
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03253-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03253-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md -->
 
 See aggregated analysis in:
 - [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)
@@ -1123,8 +1088,7 @@ See aggregated analysis in:
 Primary sibling folder analyses under `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/` carry the single-type deep treatment.
 
 ### HD10447
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10447-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10447-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md -->
 
 See aggregated analysis in:
 - [`../intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)
@@ -1136,14 +1100,13 @@ See aggregated analysis in:
 Primary sibling folder analyses under `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/` carry the single-type deep treatment.
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Election date**: September 2026 (statutory cycle)
 **T-minus**: ~5 months
 **Baseline question**: How does today's legislative batch reshape the 2026 campaign arc?
 
-## Today's election-relevant signals
+### Today's election-relevant signals
 
 | Signal | Campaign implication |
 |--------|----------------------|
@@ -1155,34 +1118,34 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | C three utvisning counter-motions | C targets migration-policy flank; differentiates from S |
 | L absent from lead ministries | L's campaign faces "what did we actually deliver?" question |
 
-## Campaign-arc reading
+### Campaign-arc reading
 
-### Coalition (M-KD-L + SD)
+#### Coalition (M-KD-L + SD)
 - **Core message**: "We delivered" — 4-bill legacy + SD discipline + Kriminalvården capacity + banking transposition
 - **Vulnerability**: Cost-of-living exposure; no positive fiscal story; L internal tension
 - **Key pre-election event**: Summer-recess communication sprint on all 4 bills passed
 
-### S (Social Democrats)
+#### S (Social Democrats)
 - **Core message**: "Cost of living; government serves large capital, not families" — drivmedel + SME sick-pay + fiscal critique
 - **Strategy**: Concentrate fire on economic axis; cede rights/ethics to V/MP/C
 - **Key test**: Does Busch's HD10447 response on 2026-05-07 open a pathway for S to pivot to "failed response" narrative?
 
-### V (Left)
+#### V (Left)
 - **Core message**: Rights-maximalism; defense of migrants and detainees
 - **Strategy**: Differentiate left flank from S on identity issues
 - **Key test**: Will HD024095 vote pattern reveal V-MP-C coordination or fragmentation?
 
-### MP (Green)
+#### MP (Green)
 - **Core message**: Ethical/climate-adjacent wedges (krigsmateriel)
 - **Strategy**: Revival of traditional MP identity via ethical-policy motions
 - **Key test**: Do MP polling numbers move on the krigsmateriel angle?
 
-### C (Centre)
+#### C (Centre)
 - **Core message**: Migration-flank differentiation
 - **Strategy**: Maintain urban-rural-centre voter base
 - **Risk**: Visibility remains low
 
-## Coalition scenario probabilities (T+5 months, forward-looking)
+### Coalition scenario probabilities (T+5 months, forward-looking)
 
 | Coalition outcome 2026 | Probability | Driver |
 |------------------------|-------------|--------|
@@ -1193,7 +1156,7 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 **Probabilities sum**: 1.00 ✅
 
-## Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)
+### Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)
 
 | Party | 2022 result (seats) | Current polling est. | Pre-election trajectory (est) |
 |-------|-----|----------------------|-------------------------------|
@@ -1208,7 +1171,7 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 _Note: Placeholder estimates; primary polling data ingest pending; this artifact's purpose is campaign-narrative inference, not precision seat forecast._
 
-## Pre-election strategic map
+### Pre-election strategic map
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1228,16 +1191,13 @@ flowchart LR
   class Summer,Campaign,Election stage
 ```
 
-_Source: cross-type inference from sibling folder materials; placeholder quantitative estimates for next-cycle refinement._
-
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 **Current Riksdag composition** (2022–2026 mandate):
 - Total: 349 seats · Majority threshold: 175 seats
 
-## Seat distribution
+### Seat distribution
 
 | Party | Seats | Role |
 |-------|-------|------|
@@ -1252,9 +1212,9 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 | **Government coalition + SD** | **176** | **Majority** |
 | **Opposition (S+V+C+MP)** | **173** | **Minority** |
 
-## Projected vote breakdown on today's top-5 dok_ids
+### Projected vote breakdown on today's top-5 dok_ids
 
-### HD03253 (EU banking) — expected vote breakdown
+#### HD03253 (EU banking) — expected vote breakdown
 
 | Party | Ja | Nej | Avstår | Mandat |
 |-------|----|----|--------|--------|
@@ -1270,7 +1230,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 **Projected outcome**: Bifall med stor majoritet. EU-compliance bills typically pass with broad assent. S abstains (standard on EU-mandated packages); C supports as EU-pragmatist; V likely opposes on ideological grounds; MP abstains.
 
-### HD03252 (detainee benefit restrictions) — expected vote breakdown
+#### HD03252 (detainee benefit restrictions) — expected vote breakdown
 
 | Party | Ja | Nej | Avstår | Mandat |
 |-------|----|----|--------|--------|
@@ -1286,7 +1246,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 **Projected outcome**: Bifall (170 Ja vs 48 Nej). **However L split (10/6) is a PIR-2 critical signal** — if L unity holds on Ja (16/0), coalition discipline is reinforced. If L dissent is larger (e.g., 6/10 split against), the bill passes with an unusual government-whip failure.
 
-### HD10447 (interpellation, SME sick-pay)
+#### HD10447 (interpellation, SME sick-pay)
 
 Not a vote — Minister Busch responds orally. Formal vote risk: if the interpellation is later converted to a motion or budget amendment, vote arithmetic becomes:
 
@@ -1301,7 +1261,7 @@ Not a vote — Minister Busch responds orally. Formal vote risk: if the interpel
 
 **Motion outcome**: Avslag (rejected). But the **campaign value** of 149 Ja seats is high — it sets up a 2026 election narrative.
 
-### HD01CU25 (prison capacity committee report)
+#### HD01CU25 (prison capacity committee report)
 
 | Party | Ja | Nej | Avstår | Mandat |
 |-------|----|----|--------|--------|
@@ -1314,7 +1274,7 @@ Not a vote — Minister Busch responds orally. Formal vote risk: if the interpel
 
 **Projected outcome**: Bifall with broad majority. Coalition + S + C all align on prison capacity; V alone on principled opposition.
 
-### HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)
+#### HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)
 
 | Party | Ja (for motion) | Nej | Avstår | Mandat |
 |-------|----------------|-----|--------|--------|
@@ -1327,7 +1287,7 @@ Not a vote — Minister Busch responds orally. Formal vote risk: if the interpel
 
 **Projected outcome**: Avslag. Classic S-V-MP bloc vs. M-KD-L-SD bloc with C abstaining.
 
-## Coalition-discipline diagnostic
+### Coalition-discipline diagnostic
 
 | Party | Disciplined vote today? | Evidence |
 |-------|--------------------------|----------|
@@ -1340,7 +1300,7 @@ Not a vote — Minister Busch responds orally. Formal vote risk: if the interpel
 | MP | Yes (ethical signalling) | Krigsmateriel motion |
 | C | Yes (flank differentiation) | Utvisning motions |
 
-## Mandatsiffror scenario check
+### Mandatsiffror scenario check
 
 **If election were held today** (per most recent polling, rounded):
 
@@ -1361,22 +1321,19 @@ Opposition (S+V+MP): 115+28+14 = **157** (below threshold, needs C)
 
 **Under current polling, S + V + MP + C has a narrow majority. But C's willingness to join is an open question — and L's 4%-threshold risk adds volatility.**
 
-## Implication of today's bills on coalition math
+### Implication of today's bills on coalition math
 
 - **HD03253 passage**: neutral coalition math (no swing votes at risk).
 - **HD03252 passage**: depends on L's internal cohesion — if L fractures publicly, coalition narrative weakens in Segment E.
 - **HD10447 response by Busch**: shapes S's ability to consolidate B + F segments.
 - **HD024082 + cluster**: baseline campaign fight; vote outcome immaterial, narrative value significant.
 
-_Source: Current Riksdag composition per data.riksdagen.se; projected vote distributions modeled on prior 2022–2026 mandate votes for analogous bills; L split scenarios per PIR-2._
-
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 **Framework**: 7-segment post-2022-election taxonomy (refined by 2024 Eurobarometer + SCB socio-economic data).
 
-## Segment matrix × today's issues
+### Segment matrix × today's issues
 
 | Segment | Size (est) | Core concerns | Today's issue relevance |
 |---------|-----------|---------------|-------------------------|
@@ -1388,35 +1345,35 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | **F. Low-information / occasional voters** | 18% | Headline issues; cost of living | Responsive to HD024082; low engagement on prudential HD03253 |
 | **G. Disengaged / protest** | 7% | None salient | Inert today |
 
-## Issue-to-segment mapping
+### Issue-to-segment mapping
 
-### HD03252 (detainee benefits)
+#### HD03252 (detainee benefits)
 - Gains: Segments A (+), D (+)
 - Neutral/ambivalent: F, G
 - Loses: C (--), E (-)
 - **Net coalition gain**: +3pp nominal; erodes with each rights-litigation event
 
-### HD03253 (EU banking)
+#### HD03253 (EU banking)
 - Gains: None directly; perceived as "technocratic EU compliance"
 - Risk: B (-), F (-) if framed as bank-friendly
 - **Net electoral effect**: 0 ± 0.5pp; a technocratic file
 
-### HD10447 (SME sick-pay)
+#### HD10447 (SME sick-pay)
 - S campaign asset: B (+), E (+), F (+)
 - Coalition defensive: A (neutral), D (slight +)
 - **Net electoral effect**: S net +1.5pp if Busch response is flat-footed
 
-### HD024082 (drivmedel)
+#### HD024082 (drivmedel)
 - S campaign asset: B (+), D (+), F (+)
 - Coalition risk: A (neutral), E (-)
 - **Net electoral effect**: S net +1pp; classic fuel-politics dynamic
 
-### HD024096 (krigsmateriel MP)
+#### HD024096 (krigsmateriel MP)
 - MP base signal: C (++) (high-engagement segment)
 - No cross-segment reach
 - **Net electoral effect**: MP +0.3pp; defensive of left flank
 
-## Segment-level coalition mathematics
+### Segment-level coalition mathematics
 
 If by September 2026:
 - Segments A + D solidly hold for coalition → 29% floor
@@ -1426,7 +1383,7 @@ If by September 2026:
 
 **Pre-election working model**: S-V-MP bloc has a narrow polling advantage (46% vs 43%) with 11% undecided pending cost-of-living debate resolution.
 
-## Turnout sensitivity
+### Turnout sensitivity
 
 | Scenario | Turnout | Coalition advantage |
 |----------|---------|---------------------|
@@ -1434,7 +1391,7 @@ If by September 2026:
 | Medium turnout (80–85%) | Standard 2022 dynamics | Coalition holds |
 | Low turnout (< 80%) | Segment G dropout benefits concentrated SD/coalition bloc | Coalition benefits |
 
-## Messaging alignment (observed from today's filings)
+### Messaging alignment (observed from today's filings)
 
 **Coalition observed messaging**: Delivery + discipline. Aligned with Segments A, D.
 **S observed messaging**: Cost-of-living + SME resilience. Aligned with Segments B, D, F.
@@ -1443,20 +1400,17 @@ If by September 2026:
 **C observed messaging**: Migration flank. Aligned with Segment E narrow.
 **L observed messaging**: Silent today. **Risk of Segment E attrition.**
 
-## Key voter-segmentation takeaway
+### Key voter-segmentation takeaway
 
 Today's battle lines favor S structurally (B + D + F are economy-responsive). Coalition holds A + D partial; vulnerable on L's representation of E. **MP and V compete for C — to the mutual detriment of S narrative consolidation.**
 
-_Source: Synthesis of 2022 election data + 2024–25 Eurobarometer segmentation + sibling-folder inference; primary SCB polling not queried this cycle (use sparingly until monthly refresh)._
-
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Comparator set**: Nordic + EU minimum (Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, Netherlands)
 **Framework**: Cross-country parallel-case analysis with normalization for political-system differences, per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 9`.
 
-## Comparator table — policy analogs to today's Swedish batch
+### Comparator table — policy analogs to today's Swedish batch
 
 | SE policy | Closest comparator(s) | Parallel analogue | Status abroad | Lesson for Sweden |
 |-----------|-----------------------|-------------------|----------------|--------------------|
@@ -1471,9 +1425,9 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | **HD024096 krigsmateriel export ban (MP motion)** | Germany SPD/Greens coalition 2021 debates; Norway 2024 export restrictions | Arms-export ethics | DE: eventual tightening; NO: selective tightening | Ethical-wedge motions rarely pass but reshape party positioning |
 | **Tidö pre-election legacy sprint** | Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election bill push; Germany Scholz 2024 pre-election push | Pre-election legacy legislation | DK: effective, Frederiksen re-elected; DE: ineffective, SPD lost | Pre-election legacy pushes help coalitions that have successfully delivered; hurt those with unfulfilled promises |
 
-## Cross-case patterns
+### Cross-case patterns
 
-### Pattern 1 — "Rights restrictions + migration = litigation magnet"
+#### Pattern 1 — "Rights restrictions + migration = litigation magnet"
 
 HD03252 + HD01SfU23 follow the Danish and Dutch template of tightening state coercion on migration/justice populations. In both comparator cases:
 - Implementation was operational within 12–18 months.
@@ -1482,19 +1436,19 @@ HD03252 + HD01SfU23 follow the Danish and Dutch template of tightening state coe
 
 **Implication for Sweden**: Expect the same trajectory — operational before election, litigation after. The political question is whether the Tidö coalition can frame enforcement as strengthening rule-of-law rather than eroding rights.
 
-### Pattern 2 — "EU prudential transposition is administrative, not political"
+#### Pattern 2 — "EU prudential transposition is administrative, not political"
 
 HD03253 CRR3/CRD6 transposition: Germany and Finland demonstrate that prudential transposition rarely becomes a public controversy. **If Sweden slips the deadline, the issue becomes visibility for EU institutional critique — not voter salience.** This is a **regulatory risk, not electoral risk**.
 
-### Pattern 3 — "Fuel-tax politics are durable but rarely decisive"
+#### Pattern 3 — "Fuel-tax politics are durable but rarely decisive"
 
 HD024082: Fuel-tax debates are common in Nordic pre-election windows but have not independently flipped an election in the comparator set. Combined with sick-pay (HD10447), they acquire more salience. S's strategy is to bundle these into a cost-of-living omnibus narrative.
 
-### Pattern 4 — "Central-bank independence — latent but unique to Sweden"
+#### Pattern 4 — "Central-bank independence — latent but unique to Sweden"
 
 HD01FiU23: Norway and Finland have not shown political appetite for reviewing central-bank independence. Sweden's latent willingness (SD history) makes this the **only uniquely Swedish institutional risk** in today's batch.
 
-## Nordic comparator matrix (condensed)
+### Nordic comparator matrix (condensed)
 
 | Dimension | DK | NO | FI | SE today |
 |-----------|----|----|----|----------|
@@ -1504,76 +1458,73 @@ HD01FiU23: Norway and Finland have not shown political appetite for reviewing ce
 | SME sick-pay politics | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | MEDIUM |
 | Legislative throughput in pre-election quarter | HIGH | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | HIGH (today = top-5% day) |
 
-## EU-level comparator
+### EU-level comparator
 
 - **CRR3/CRD6**: 25/27 member states on track; Sweden currently flag-yellow on timeline.
 - **ECHR litigation volume**: Sweden historically low (per capita); HD03252 could raise the profile.
 - **Tachograph compliance**: Routine; no EU risk.
 
-## Key comparative observation
+### Key comparative observation
 
 Sweden's distinguishing feature in this reporting day is not any single policy — each has a Nordic or EU parallel — but the **simultaneous layering** of rights, banking, migration, and fiscal items on a single day. The Danish 2015 "jewellery-law" day was a single-issue spectacle; the German 2024 pre-election push was fiscally concentrated. **Sweden 2026-04-24 is unusual in scope and rhythm combined.**
 
-_Source: cross-case synthesis drawing on sibling folder comparative analyses + Nordic/EU institutional knowledge from prior monthly-reviews._
-
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: Place today's reporting signals in historical context — Swedish and Nordic parliamentary history, with disciplined analogical reasoning.
 
-## Swedish historical parallels
+### Swedish historical parallels
 
-### Parallel 1 — Pre-election sprint of Bildt 1994
+#### Parallel 1 — Pre-election sprint of Bildt 1994
 **Analogue**: Carl Bildt's coalition government in spring 1994 similarly pushed a concentrated reform agenda before the autumn 1994 election.
 **Differences**: Bildt had a weaker parliamentary base; Tidöavtalet has SD support-party architecture.
 **Lesson**: Concentrated pre-election reform agendas can project competence but require delivery proof — Bildt lost, partly on unemployment. Today's coalition must avoid a similar fate on cost-of-living.
 
-### Parallel 2 — Reinfeldt 2010 pre-election legacy
+#### Parallel 2 — Reinfeldt 2010 pre-election legacy
 **Analogue**: Fredrik Reinfeldt's 2010 pre-election legacy-consolidation — tax reforms, school reforms, healthcare standards.
 **Differences**: Reinfeldt held two mandates already; Tidöavtalet is first-mandate.
 **Lesson**: Legacy consolidation worked for Reinfeldt in 2010 but not in 2014. Today's coalition is in a first-mandate position structurally similar to 2010.
 
-### Parallel 3 — Löfven 2018 pre-formation crisis
+#### Parallel 3 — Löfven 2018 pre-formation crisis
 **Analogue**: 134-day government formation in late 2018–early 2019 demonstrates that Swedish politics tolerates extended formation.
 **Lesson**: If the Sept 2026 election produces fragmentation, formation could again be protracted — S's interpellation strategy (HD10447) could become important for post-election bargaining.
 
-### Parallel 4 — Persson 2006 SME sick-pay revisited
+#### Parallel 4 — Persson 2006 SME sick-pay revisited
 **Analogue**: Göran Persson's government made SME sick-pay a campaign issue in 2006. Outcome: S lost narrowly.
 **Lesson**: SME sick-pay (HD10447) is a recurring Swedish campaign axis. Historical base rate suggests it shifts about 1–2 pp but rarely decides elections alone.
 
-### Parallel 5 — Riksbank Act 2022 overhaul
+#### Parallel 5 — Riksbank Act 2022 overhaul
 **Analogue**: Sweden's 2022 Riksbank Act overhaul was the largest institutional change to central-bank governance in decades.
 **Differences**: It was bipartisan.
 **Lesson**: Riksbank governance rarely polarizes — but if HD01FiU23 opens a political-oversight debate, this would be a **break from the 2022 consensus pattern**.
 
-## Nordic historical parallels
+### Nordic historical parallels
 
-### Parallel 6 — Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election push
+#### Parallel 6 — Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election push
 **Analogue**: Mette Frederiksen's SD government pushed a concentrated pre-election agenda on immigration and welfare in 2019, benefiting from the 2018 sentiment shift.
 **Differences**: SD had just emerged; Frederiksen's base was more centrist.
 **Lesson**: Pre-election legacy-push succeeded when backed by consistent narrative. Today's Tidöavtalet has discipline (SD) but risks narrative fragmentation (L's quiet absence).
 
-### Parallel 7 — Norway Solberg 2021 defeat
+#### Parallel 7 — Norway Solberg 2021 defeat
 **Analogue**: Erna Solberg's coalition lost 2021 election despite visible pre-election activity.
 **Lesson**: Legislative throughput alone is insufficient. What matters is how throughput is framed — Solberg's 2021 messaging was diffuse; Frederiksen's 2019 was concentrated.
 
-### Parallel 8 — Finland Orpo 2023 victory
+#### Parallel 8 — Finland Orpo 2023 victory
 **Analogue**: Petteri Orpo's coalition came to power in 2023 on a very similar M-KD-SD-like framework (Kokoomus-PS-KD-RKP).
 **Relevant lesson**: Fiscal-discipline narrative + coalition-partner-of-confidence strategy can carry centre-right coalitions through pre-election periods — especially if SD-equivalent party maintains support-party discipline. **This is the most direct positive analogue for Sweden's coalition.**
 
-## Legal-historical parallels
+### Legal-historical parallels
 
-### Parallel 9 — 2011 migration bifurcation attempt
+#### Parallel 9 — 2011 migration bifurcation attempt
 **Analogue**: The 2011 Reinfeldt coalition attempted a bifurcated protection regime for migrants; aborted by political-complexity concerns.
 **Differences**: Today's HD01SfU23 is a committee report working on a similar structural idea, with an SD support architecture that was unavailable in 2011.
 **Lesson**: What was legally possible but politically infeasible in 2011 may now be achievable — but at the cost of litigation trail.
 
-### Parallel 10 — ECHR cases against Sweden (2010s)
+#### Parallel 10 — ECHR cases against Sweden (2010s)
 **Analogue**: Sweden has received a handful of ECHR adverse judgments on migration/asylum matters in the 2010s, consistently with proportionality gaps.
 **Lesson**: Proportionality safeguards added before enactment reduce ECHR exposure substantially — a pre-3rd-reading amendment to HD03252 could move KJ-5 confidence from MEDIUM (55–70%) to LOW (15–30%).
 
-## Historical-base-rate summary
+### Historical-base-rate summary
 
 | Class of event | Historical base rate | Today's evidence lean |
 |----------------|-----------------------|------------------------|
@@ -1584,19 +1535,16 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 | EU transposition deadline miss | 8–15% | HD03253 within risk band |
 | Central-bank politicization debate triggered | < 5% (post-2000) | HD01FiU23 latent only |
 
-## Conclusion from historical reasoning
+### Conclusion from historical reasoning
 
 Today's reporting day fits recurrent Swedish + Nordic patterns but with one distinctive feature: the **simultaneous layering of four policy axes** (rights, banking, migration, fiscal) on a single reporting day. In 25 years of post-2000 Nordic pre-election pushes, single-axis concentration is the norm. A four-axis push is a high-stakes gambit: if executed, it creates a legacy; if any axis breaks, it creates cascading doubt.
 
-_Source: Historical synthesis from general Swedish/Nordic parliamentary record; not primary-source queried this cycle._
-
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 **Framework**: 4-dimension feasibility assessment (Operational × Fiscal × Legal × Political) per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 7`.
 
-## Feasibility matrix — top legislative items
+### Feasibility matrix — top legislative items
 
 | dok_id | Operational | Fiscal | Legal | Political | Overall |
 |--------|-------------|--------|-------|-----------|---------|
@@ -1610,43 +1558,43 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 | **HD10447** SME sick-pay (proposal from interpellation) | **MEDIUM** | **LOW** — fiscal cost | **HIGH** | **LOW** — government opposed | **LOW-MEDIUM** |
 | **HD024096** krigsmateriel ban | **MEDIUM** | **MEDIUM** | **MEDIUM** — WTO/EU considerations | **LOW** | **LOW** (if reached vote) |
 
-## Implementation risk by item
+### Implementation risk by item
 
-### HD03252 (detainee benefits) — MEDIUM feasibility
+#### HD03252 (detainee benefits) — MEDIUM feasibility
 **Operational path**: Kriminalvården must redesign benefit-delivery systems. Capacity expansion required (HD01CU25 tie-in).
 **Fiscal path**: Manageable — estimated ~ 50–150 MSEK in implementation costs.
 **Legal path**: ECHR proportionality test is the binding constraint. If proportionality amendment absent, 15–30% chance of adverse ECtHR judgment within 30 months (per `devils-advocate.md` ACH).
 **Political path**: L flank is the binding risk. Pre-3rd-reading amendment signals probable (coalition incentive to avoid fracture).
 
-### HD03253 (EU banking) — HIGH feasibility
+#### HD03253 (EU banking) — HIGH feasibility
 **Operational path**: FI operationally ready; transposition is regulatory-text work.
 **Fiscal path**: RWA redistribution is industry-internal; no fiscal cost to Treasury.
 **Legal path**: EU-mandated; no domestic legal challenge vector.
 **Political path**: Unified coalition + silent S + supportive C. Opposition on ideological grounds limited to V.
 **Binding constraint**: Parliamentary calendar. If FiU schedules by 2026-05-15, probability of on-time transposition > 85%.
 
-### HD01CU25 (prison capacity) — MEDIUM feasibility
+#### HD01CU25 (prison capacity) — MEDIUM feasibility
 **Operational path**: Capacity scaling is real and challenging. Q2 report will reveal if plan is achievable.
 **Fiscal path**: Costed in current budget cycle; no new funds.
 **Legal path**: Uncontested.
 **Political path**: Broad majority support.
 **Binding constraint**: Actual ability to commission beds per timeline.
 
-### HD10447 (SME sick-pay, if converted to motion) — LOW feasibility
+#### HD10447 (SME sick-pay, if converted to motion) — LOW feasibility
 **Operational path**: Redesign of Försäkringskassan reimbursement rules.
 **Fiscal path**: Estimated 500–1500 MSEK/year in reimbursements — politically charged cost.
 **Legal path**: Straightforward.
 **Political path**: Government refuses under current coalition math. Opposition push for campaign narrative value, not immediate legislation.
 **Implementation realistic only post-2026 election under S government**.
 
-### HD024096 (krigsmateriel export ban) — LOW feasibility
+#### HD024096 (krigsmateriel export ban) — LOW feasibility
 **Operational path**: Redesign of ISP approval regime. Significant.
 **Fiscal path**: Indirect costs via industrial contraction.
 **Legal path**: Potential WTO and EU considerations.
 **Political path**: No government majority; symbolic vote.
 **Implementation realistic only under a different coalition**.
 
-## Capacity-versus-ambition gap
+### Capacity-versus-ambition gap
 
 The key finding: today's legislative ambition **exceeds** current administrative capacity in two places:
 1. **Kriminalvården** (HD03252 × HD01CU25) — bed capacity plan tight
@@ -1654,7 +1602,7 @@ The key finding: today's legislative ambition **exceeds** current administrative
 
 Capacity gaps do not prevent enactment but create operational-risk pathways (R3, R7 in `risk-assessment.md`).
 
-## Fiscal absorption
+### Fiscal absorption
 
 | Item | Est. direct cost 2026–2028 (MSEK) | Budget line |
 |------|-----------------------------------|-------------|
@@ -1667,7 +1615,7 @@ Capacity gaps do not prevent enactment but create operational-risk pathways (R3,
 
 **Total new estimated direct fiscal exposure**: ~ 2.0–3.2 BSEK 2026–2028 — modest against national budget; concentrated in justice + migration lines.
 
-## Capacity bottleneck mapping
+### Capacity bottleneck mapping
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1683,27 +1631,24 @@ graph TD
   class FI,TS,RB nominal
 ```
 
-## Implementation-feasibility conclusion
+### Implementation-feasibility conclusion
 
 Of the four PM-signed propositions, **HD03253, HD03256, and HD03104** are structurally feasible with high confidence. **HD03252** is feasible but depends on capacity delivery at Kriminalvården and proportionality safeguards. The committee reports are similarly tiered — FiU23 and CU25 are high-feasibility; SfU23 faces operational risk.
 
 The **opposition motion cluster** is structurally infeasible under current coalition math — these motions are campaign-signal tools, not immediate legislative risks.
 
-_Source: Synthesis of sibling implementation-feasibility sections + operational-knowledge cross-reference._
-
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) per Heuer, plus formal devil's-advocate challenge to the base narrative (ICD 203 Standard 9).
 
-## The base narrative (what the synthesis claims)
+### The base narrative (what the synthesis claims)
 
 > "Tidö coalition is running a coordinated pre-election legacy sprint — 4 PM-signed propositions + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations on one day. SD discipline is intact (zero motions). Opposition has atomized into 4 separate arcs (S economy, V rights, MP ethics, C migration-flank). The day reveals a high-confidence political-rhythm reading."
 
-## Competing hypotheses
+### Competing hypotheses
 
-### H1 — "Calendar coincidence, not coordination"
+#### H1 — "Calendar coincidence, not coordination"
 
 **Claim**: The 4-prop + 5-bet + 16-ip concentration is a calendar-rhythm coincidence driven by committee deadlines, session pacing, and parliamentary filing windows — not a deliberately orchestrated sprint.
 
@@ -1719,7 +1664,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 **Verdict**: H1 accounts for 15–25% of variance. The baseline narrative (H0) is still more parsimonious.
 
-### H2 — "Coalition-fragility signal, not confidence signal"
+#### H2 — "Coalition-fragility signal, not confidence signal"
 
 **Claim**: The PM-signature concentration is not a sign of confidence but of **crisis management** — the PM personally shepherds bills because ministerial trust is low, not high. L's absence from lead roles is not structural; it is a current crisis.
 
@@ -1735,7 +1680,7 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 **Verdict**: H2 accounts for 10–15% of variance. A latent warning to monitor, not the primary reading.
 
-### H3 — "Strategic convergence, not sprint"
+#### H3 — "Strategic convergence, not sprint"
 
 **Claim**: The appearance of a "sprint" is a retrospective frame. What the coalition is doing is **routine legacy consolidation** — bills that have been in pipeline for 6–18 months happen to mature at similar cadence. The political-rhythm reading assigns strategy to what is pipeline physics.
 
@@ -1750,11 +1695,11 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 **Verdict**: H3 accounts for 20–30% of variance. Part-true but incomplete.
 
-### H0 — The base narrative ("coordinated pre-election legacy sprint")
+#### H0 — The base narrative ("coordinated pre-election legacy sprint")
 
 Still carries 55–65% of variance — the most parsimonious explanation combining signing-pattern + SD-discipline + opposition-atomization + effective-date clustering.
 
-## ACH Matrix
+### ACH Matrix
 
 | Evidence | H0 (sprint) | H1 (coincidence) | H2 (fragility) | H3 (convergence) |
 |----------|-------------|------------------|----------------|-------------------|
@@ -1772,7 +1717,7 @@ Legend: ++ strong support · + moderate support · 0 neutral · - mild contradic
 
 **Weighted ACH result**: H0 dominates (+11) vs H1 (-2), H2 (+1), H3 (+3). H3 is the most viable alternative.
 
-## Falsification tests
+### Falsification tests
 
 **For H0 to be falsified**:
 1. SD files a counter-motion on any of the 9 active bills within 30 days
@@ -1784,7 +1729,7 @@ Legend: ++ strong support · + moderate support · 0 neutral · - mild contradic
 1. Historical average shows that 4 PM-signed bills in one day is normal (it is not — this is top-1% rare)
 2. Other Nordic or EU governments show identical cyclic pattern
 
-## Red-team challenge to the DIW ranking
+### Red-team challenge to the DIW ranking
 
 **Challenge**: "You rank HD10447 (single interpellation) at DIW 3.85, higher than HD03253 (EU-mandated transposition) at 3.80. This is wrong — an interpellation is non-binding, a transposition is legally binding."
 
@@ -1795,7 +1740,7 @@ Legend: ++ strong support · + moderate support · 0 neutral · - mild contradic
 - The two are near-tied (3.85 vs 3.80); the ranking is sensitive to ±0.1 perturbation.
 - **Concession**: If the audience is legal/market, HD03253 should be first. If political-strategy, HD10447 first. The synthesis leads with HD03253 on consequence grounds — this resolves the apparent contradiction.
 
-## Alternative-framework check
+### Alternative-framework check
 
 **If we apply a pure legalist framework (rather than political-rhythm)**:
 - Ranking becomes: HD03253 > HD03252 > HD01FiU23 > HD03256 > HD01CU25 > HD03104 > HD10447 > motions cluster
@@ -1809,16 +1754,13 @@ Legend: ++ strong support · + moderate support · 0 neutral · - mild contradic
 
 The choice of framework matters. The base narrative has been tested under three framings; the political-rhythm framing best accommodates all the evidence.
 
-_Source: internal devil's-advocate challenge; ACH matrix per Heuer ICD 203-compliant methodology; red-team ranking challenge._
-
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Framework**: 7-dimension taxonomy per `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 3 · Classification`.
 Dimensions: Topic · Stakeholder · Urgency · Scope · Impact · Controversy · Decision-lens.
 
-## Top-tier document classification matrix
+### Top-tier document classification matrix
 
 | dok_id | Topic | Primary stakeholder | Urgency | Scope | Impact | Controversy | Decision-lens |
 |--------|-------|---------------------|---------|-------|--------|-------------|---------------|
@@ -1833,41 +1775,41 @@ Dimensions: Topic · Stakeholder · Urgency · Scope · Impact · Controversy ·
 | **HD024096** | Arms-export ethics | MP ethical-policy team + UU + defense industry | LOW (signaling) | Domestic | LOW (no majority) | MEDIUM — moral-wedge | Coalition-fracture test |
 | **HD03104** | Debt-management skr | FiU + Riksgälden | LOW (annual) | Domestic | MEDIUM — fiscal credibility | LOW | Budget-context framing |
 
-## Topic clustering
+### Topic clustering
 
-### Cluster A · Coercive-authority expansion
+#### Cluster A · Coercive-authority expansion
 - HD03252 (detainee benefits)
 - HD01CU25 (prison capacity)
 - HD01SfU23 (migration law)
 - **Common feature**: State-to-individual coercion in the Tidöavtalet framework
 - **Cluster controversy**: HIGH (L + V + MP + civil liberty NGOs active)
 
-### Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional
+#### Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional
 - HD03253 (EU banking)
 - HD01FiU23 (Riksbank)
 - HD03104 (debt-management skr)
 - **Common feature**: Macro-institutional architecture
 - **Cluster controversy**: MEDIUM (technical debates, ideological latent)
 
-### Cluster C · Opposition economic counter-choreography
+#### Cluster C · Opposition economic counter-choreography
 - HD024082 + HD024092 + HD024098 (drivmedel)
 - HD10447 + 11 other S interpellations
 - **Common feature**: S-led cost-of-living campaign sequencing
 - **Cluster controversy**: MEDIUM (classic left-right but high pre-election salience)
 
-### Cluster D · Low-controversy throughput
+#### Cluster D · Low-controversy throughput
 - HD03256 (tachograph)
 - HD01AU15 (ILO)
 - HD01CU29 (EV infrastructure)
 - **Common feature**: Routine EU-harmonization or bipartisan passages
 
-## Urgency distribution
+### Urgency distribution
 
 - **HIGH (within 30 days of action trigger)**: 1 · HD03253
 - **MEDIUM (within 90 days)**: 6 · HD03252, HD10447, HD01CU25, HD024082, HD01SfU23, (drivmedel cluster)
 - **LOW (routine cycle)**: 10 · remaining items
 
-## Stakeholder coverage map
+### Stakeholder coverage map
 
 | Stakeholder | Count of today's dokuments touching them |
 |-------------|------------------------------------------|
@@ -1882,13 +1824,13 @@ Dimensions: Topic · Stakeholder · Urgency · Scope · Impact · Controversy ·
 | EU Commission | 2 (HD03253, HD01SfU23) |
 | Markets / investors | 3 (HD01FiU23, HD03253, HD03104) |
 
-## Cross-classification coverage check (ICD 203 Standard 4)
+### Cross-classification coverage check (ICD 203 Standard 4)
 
 - All 19 consolidated dok_ids appear in at least one row above.
 - All top-5 DIW items (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252, HD01CU25, HD024082) appear in the top block.
 - No dok_id appears in more than one cluster without explicit cross-reference (Cluster A — HD01SfU23; Cluster C — HD024082; handled as cluster-level memberships only).
 
-## Decision-lens output
+### Decision-lens output
 
 For each high-DIW item, the **single decision** this classification enables:
 
@@ -1898,15 +1840,12 @@ For each high-DIW item, the **single decision** this classification enables:
 - **HD01CU25**: Will Q2 Kriminalvården capacity report confirm the +5200 bed plan? → PIR-5.
 - **HD024082 + cluster**: Will a formal summer-recess fuel-price interpellation round be scheduled? → Watchlist.
 
-_Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling classification-results.md files; cross-type topic-cluster synthesis._
-
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Function**: Traceability web linking every claim to source artifacts per Tier-C aggregation contract.
 
-## Internal artifact dependencies
+### Internal artifact dependencies
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1934,11 +1873,11 @@ graph LR
   CRM --> README[README]
 ```
 
-## Sibling-folder citations (Tier-C mandatory)
+### Sibling-folder citations (Tier-C mandatory)
 
 Evening analysis aggregates and cross-references today's four single-type analyses. Sibling paths — all under `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/`:
 
-### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/`
+#### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/`
 **Source artifacts ingested**:
 - `executive-brief.md` — coalition prop-signing pattern
 - `significance-scoring.md` — HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104 DIW scores
@@ -1946,7 +1885,7 @@ Evening analysis aggregates and cross-references today's four single-type analys
 - `devils-advocate.md` — H1/H2/H3 on sprint thesis
 - `forward-indicators.md` — PIR-1 anchor date
 
-### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/`
+#### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/`
 **Source artifacts ingested**:
 - `classification-results.md` — S/V/MP motion clustering
 - `stakeholder-perspectives.md` — 6-lens on drivmedel motion HD024082
@@ -1954,19 +1893,19 @@ Evening analysis aggregates and cross-references today's four single-type analys
 - `election-2026-analysis.md` — campaign-narrative mapping
 - `voter-segmentation.md` — segment targeting per motion
 
-### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/`
+#### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/`
 **Source artifacts ingested**:
 - `intelligence-assessment.md` — CU25/SfU23/FiU23/AU15/CU29 committee-floor signal
 - `scenario-analysis.md` — coalition durability per committee signal
 - `methodology-reflection.md` — committee-floor-signal methodology
 
-### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/`
+#### `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/`
 **Source artifacts ingested**:
 - `executive-brief.md` — S-party 12-of-16 interpellation-filing dominance
 - `significance-scoring.md` — HD10447 SME sick-pay tier placement
 - `media-framing-analysis.md` — Aftonbladet amplification
 
-## Claim-to-source matrix (high-value claims)
+### Claim-to-source matrix (high-value claims)
 
 | Claim in evening-analysis | Source artifact | Source folder |
 |---------------------------|-----------------|---------------|
@@ -1981,7 +1920,7 @@ Evening analysis aggregates and cross-references today's four single-type analys
 | "Coalition math Ja/Nej breakdown per dok_id" | coalition-mathematics | evening-analysis |
 | "Historical parallel: 2005/2018 pre-election sprints" | historical-parallels | evening-analysis |
 
-## External authoritative sources
+### External authoritative sources
 
 | Type | Source | Usage |
 |------|--------|-------|
@@ -1993,21 +1932,21 @@ Evening analysis aggregates and cross-references today's four single-type analys
 | SCB | Statistics Sweden | Base-rate referents |
 | ISP | Inspektionen för strategiska produkter | HD024091/96 export-control context |
 
-## Prior-cycle ingestion
+### Prior-cycle ingestion
 
 Per Tier-C contract, today's analysis ingests **prior-cycle PIRs** from:
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/` (prior day's evening-analysis, if present) — see `intelligence-assessment.md`
 - `analysis/weekly/2026-W17/` (prior-week review, if present) — see `intelligence-assessment.md`
 - `analysis/monthly/2026-04/` (April monthly review, if present) — see `intelligence-assessment.md`
 
-## Forward-reference targets
+### Forward-reference targets
 
 This evening-analysis cascade will feed forward to:
 - `analysis/weekly/2026-W17/` (end-of-week review)
 - `analysis/monthly/2026-04/` (end-of-April review)
 - `analysis/daily/2026-09-*/` (election-period analyses)
 
-## Traceability verification
+### Traceability verification
 
 Every Key Judgment (KJ1–KJ7) in `intelligence-assessment.md` links to ≥ 2 sibling artifacts.
 Every scenario (S1–S4) in `scenario-analysis.md` links to ≥ 1 PIR in `intelligence-assessment.md`.
@@ -2016,16 +1955,13 @@ Every forward indicator (F1–F20) in `forward-indicators.md` links to ≥ 1 PIR
 
 **No orphan claims detected.**
 
-_Source: Internal artifact graph + sibling-folder ingestion table._
-
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: Self-audit against ICD 203 + Admiralty + WEP standards; explicit Methodology Improvements for next-cycle application.
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling
 
-## Compliance matrix — tradecraft standards applied
+### Compliance matrix — tradecraft standards applied
 
 | Standard | Requirement | Where applied in this artifact set | Status |
 |----------|-------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
@@ -2042,7 +1978,7 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | WEP / Kent Scale | Verbal-probability-to-numeric calibration | Highly likely = 70–85%; possible = 30–45% | ✅ |
 | Structured Analytic Techniques | ACH, Red Team, Devil's Advocate, Key Assumptions Check, SWOT, TOWS | All applied across artifact set | ✅ |
 
-## Party-neutrality arithmetic audit
+### Party-neutrality arithmetic audit
 
 Count of party mentions across the 23 artifacts (indicative):
 
@@ -2059,7 +1995,7 @@ Count of party mentions across the 23 artifacts (indicative):
 
 **Audit conclusion**: All 8 parties mentioned; 8/8 framed in terms of observable actions and strategic-logic interpretation, not moral judgment. The ratio of opposition-to-government mentions (74:74) is perfectly balanced — though this is not a virtue in itself, it reflects the day's genuine political symmetry.
 
-## Ambiguity and uncertainty handling
+### Ambiguity and uncertainty handling
 
 Where today's artifacts deploy explicit uncertainty markers:
 
@@ -2071,35 +2007,35 @@ Where today's artifacts deploy explicit uncertainty markers:
 
 **Prohibition check**: ✅ No weasel words ("could", "may", "some analysts suggest") without a numeric anchor.
 
-## Methodology strengths observed
+### Methodology strengths observed
 
 1. **Cross-type synthesis** is structurally superior to any single-type analysis — the pre-election-sprint reading emerges only by joining prop + motion + bet + ip.
 2. **SD zero-motion silence** was treated as positive evidence (high DIW null-event) rather than absence — a tradecraft maturity marker.
 3. **Prior-cycle PIR ingestion** was completed (Tier-C requirement) — no orphan PIRs remain from prior cycles.
 
-## Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)
+### Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)
 
 Three named improvements for the next reporting cycle:
 
-### Methodology Improvement 1 — **Quantitative coalition-discipline index**
+#### Methodology Improvement 1 — **Quantitative coalition-discipline index**
 
 Today I inferred "SD discipline intact" from a zero-motion count over 72 hours. A more rigorous measurement would construct a discipline index over a rolling 30-day window comparing SD motion-filing rate against prior Tidö periods and the 2022–2026 mandate baseline.
 
 **Action for next run**: Build `scripts/coalition-discipline-index.ts` using `riksdag-regering-search_dokument` with filter `parti=SD` + `doktyp=mot` + rolling window. Record baseline and today's delta.
 
-### Methodology Improvement 2 — **ECHR-case-law-anchored confidence for rights judgments**
+#### Methodology Improvement 2 — **ECHR-case-law-anchored confidence for rights judgments**
 
 Today I asserted (KJ-5) that HD03252 has a ~55–70% probability of ECHR challenge within 18 months. This confidence rests on subject-matter intuition rather than a structured case-law taxonomy.
 
 **Action for next run**: Build a reference table of recent ECtHR Article 3/8 cases on detainee conditions (win/loss rates, timelines, facts) and anchor future rights-litigation probabilities to the empirical base rate.
 
-### Methodology Improvement 3 — **Pre-election-sprint comparator database**
+#### Methodology Improvement 3 — **Pre-election-sprint comparator database**
 
 Today I used Nordic + EU comparators (Denmark 2019, Germany 2024, etc.) qualitatively. For recurrent Tier-C evening analyses during the pre-election window, a structured comparator database with normalized features (seats-swing, pre-election bill volume, coalition-party count) would elevate the comparative-international artifact from descriptive to explanatory.
 
 **Action for next run**: Build `analysis/references/pre-election-sprint-comparators.md` with 8–12 normalized cases from 2015–2024.
 
-## Limitations of today's analysis
+### Limitations of today's analysis
 
 1. **Single-day snapshot** — today's high-DIW reading could be smoothed against a 30-day moving average.
 2. **No primary survey data** — polling inferences rely on secondary market commentary.
@@ -2107,7 +2043,7 @@ Today I used Nordic + EU comparators (Denmark 2019, Germany 2024, etc.) qualitat
 4. **Sibling-folder dependence** — this evening analysis inherits framing from morning analyses; independent re-derivation was partial.
 5. **IMF/SCB data not directly queried this cycle** — carried forward from monthly-review.
 
-## Process audit — time and iteration
+### Process audit — time and iteration
 
 - **Wall-clock budget**: 60 minutes end-to-end (Timer A) | 28 minutes to PR call (Timer B)
 - **Pass 1 time**: Approximately 20–25 minutes to produce 23 artifacts
@@ -2115,7 +2051,7 @@ Today I used Nordic + EU comparators (Denmark 2019, Germany 2024, etc.) qualitat
 - **AI-FIRST compliance**: Minimum 2 iterations met; all claims reviewed against alternatives
 - **Shortcut discipline**: All 23 artifacts produced with substantive content; no boilerplate
 
-## Next-cycle handoff package (for tomorrow's morning analysis)
+### Next-cycle handoff package (for tomorrow's morning analysis)
 
 1. PIR-1–PIR-7 explicit in intelligence-assessment.md
 2. Standing PIRs A/B/C carried forward
@@ -2123,11 +2059,8 @@ Today I used Nordic + EU comparators (Denmark 2019, Germany 2024, etc.) qualitat
 4. Methodology Improvements 1–3 flagged for implementation
 5. Carried-forward Scenario monitoring plan
 
-_Source: self-audit against `analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md` + `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Self-Audit Checklist`._
-
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Workflow**: `news-evening-analysis` · **Run ID**: 24906725202 · **UTC**: 2026-04-24T19:00:52Z
 **Requested date**: 2026-04-24 · **Effective date**: 2026-04-24 · **Window**: today + 7-day lookback for sibling integration
@@ -2135,7 +2068,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling · **Classification**: OPEN · Public sources only (GDPR Art. 9(2)(e,g))
 **Confidence**: HIGH (A1) — primary Riksdag open-data via MCP `get_sync_status` returned `status: live` at 19:00:52Z
 
-## MCP health at start
+### MCP health at start
 
 | Server | Status | Latency | Notes |
 |--------|--------|---------|-------|
@@ -2144,11 +2077,11 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | world-bank | available | — | Non-economic residue only (WGI), not required today |
 | github | available | — | Used for artifact staging |
 
-## Primary data sources (Tier-C ingestion model)
+### Primary data sources (Tier-C ingestion model)
 
 This is a **Tier-C aggregation workflow** — the primary data inputs are the four sibling per-type analyses already produced for 2026-04-24. Per `ext/tier-c-aggregation.md §Cross-type synthesis`, the evening-analysis reads sibling folders and cites them. No fresh per-`dok_id` downloads are required at this stage; all `dok_id` provenance is already resolved in the sibling manifests.
 
-### Sibling folders read (today)
+#### Sibling folders read (today)
 
 | Sibling folder | Path | Lead documents ingested |
 |----------------|------|--------------------------|
@@ -2157,11 +2090,11 @@ This is a **Tier-C aggregation workflow** — the primary data inputs are the fo
 | committeeReports | `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/` | HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29 |
 | interpellations | `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/` | HD10447 (lead) + HD10428–HD10446 (15 additional) |
 
-### Reference Analyses (sibling synthesis ingestion per ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)
+#### Reference Analyses (sibling synthesis ingestion per ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)
 
 Every sibling `synthesis-summary.md`, `intelligence-assessment.md`, and `executive-brief.md` was read and incorporated into this evening-analysis. Unique `dok_id` references extracted: **44** (4 propositions + 20 motions + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations − overlap). Open PIRs carried forward: see `intelligence-assessment.md §Prior-cycle PIR ingestion`.
 
-### Per-document table (consolidated across siblings)
+#### Per-document table (consolidated across siblings)
 
 | dok_id | Title | Type | Committee | Party/Actor | Admiralty | Full-text status |
 |--------|-------|------|-----------|-------------|-----------|------------------|
@@ -2187,17 +2120,17 @@ Every sibling `synthesis-summary.md`, `intelligence-assessment.md`, and `executi
 
 Full per-document detail lives in each sibling folder's `documents/` subdirectory. This evening-analysis references but does **not duplicate** those files (see `cross-reference-map.md §Sibling folders`).
 
-## MCP server availability notes
+### MCP server availability notes
 
 - `riksdag-regering`: healthy throughout the run. No retries required.
 - `scb`: not queried (economic context carried forward from sibling analyses and IMF cache).
 - `world-bank`: not queried (non-economic residue not required for today's themes).
 
-## Retrieval timestamps
+### Retrieval timestamps
 
 All sibling folders last written 2026-04-24 between 06:00Z (propositions) and 18:30Z (interpellations) per `git log` on each folder. This evening-analysis folder created 2026-04-24T19:01Z.
 
-## Provenance hash
+### Provenance hash
 
 - **Primary**: Swedish Riksdag open data (data.riksdagen.se) — A1
 - **Secondary**: Regeringen pressroom / regeringen.se — A1–A2
@@ -2205,3 +2138,35 @@ All sibling folders last written 2026-04-24 between 06:00Z (propositions) and 18
 - **Tradecraft**: ICD 203, Admiralty 6×6, SATs (ACH, Red Team, Key Assumptions Check) applied per `analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md`
 
 — End of manifest —
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03252-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03253-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10447-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/article.md
index f6bf3d16ba..98d920bc22 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-24
 subfolder: interpellations
 slug: 2026-04-24-interpellations
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.940Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.735Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,31 +26,30 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 A single new interpellation ([HD10447](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html), S) was announced today, forcing Energy- och näringsminister **Ebba Busch (KD)** to defend the 2024 abolition of the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement by **2026-05-07**. The item is low in legislative velocity but strategically significant because it reopens the SME-growth narrative four months before the September 2026 election. Confidence MEDIUM — single-source day with rich policy history (`A2` Admiralty).
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Editorial**: Should today's political-intelligence lede lead with HD10447 or cluster it as part of the week's S-interpellation campaign pattern (HD10428–HD10447, 16 items in 3 weeks, 12 of them S)? *Recommendation: cluster-frame with HD10447 as anchor* — see [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md).
 2. **Analyst**: Should we escalate the sick-pay-cost reimbursement to the **election-2026** watchlist as a defined SME-economics wedge? *Recommendation: yes, tier-2 indicator* — see [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md) and [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md).
 3. **Editorial calendar**: Should we pre-schedule a follow-up piece for the **2026-05-07** ministerial response window? *Recommendation: yes, lock 05-07/05-08 window* — see [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md) trigger IT-1.
 
-## 📌 60-second Read
+### 📌 60-second Read
 
 - **What happened** — Patrik Lundqvist (S) filed an interpellation asking whether Minister Busch (KD) will review the effects on SMEs of abolishing the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement (in force 2016–2024). `dok_id: HD10447` `A2`.
 - **Why it matters** — Frames the Kristersson government's 2024 SME-cost decision as a growth drag vs Europe; Sweden's underperformance vs EU average since 2023 is embedded in the text. Economic wedge, pre-election.
 - **Who's on the hook** — Minister Busch (KD) must respond by **2026-05-07**; pressure also implicates Finance Minister Svantesson (M) on fiscal trade-offs.
 - **Second-order signal** — S has filed **12 of 16** interpellations in the HD10428–HD10447 window (75%); SD 2, C 1, independent 1. Pattern: opposition stress-testing the government's economic record.
 
-## 🔮 Top Forward Trigger
+### 🔮 Top Forward Trigger
 
 **IT-1 · 2026-05-07** — Minister Busch's written answer. If the minister declines to re-examine the policy, expect S to escalate via a subsequent motion or budget amendment in the 2026/27 budget round (autumn).
 
-## 📊 Visual — Significance snapshot
+### 📊 Visual — Significance snapshot
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -67,7 +66,7 @@ quadrantChart
     "HD10439 police shortage": [0.22, 0.62]
 ```
 
-## 🔗 Companion files
+### 🔗 Companion files
 
 - [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md) — integrated picture
 - [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md) — Key Judgments + PIRs
@@ -75,7 +74,7 @@ quadrantChart
 - [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md) — dated triggers
 - [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md) — 5-dimension register
 
-## 📜 Sources
+### 📜 Sources
 
 - Primary: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html> (A2)
 - SCB labour-market tables (referenced for SME cost context): <https://www.scb.se/> (A2)
@@ -84,14 +83,13 @@ quadrantChart
 ---
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md)_
-
-## Lead decision
+### Lead decision
 
 The single new interpellation announced in chamber today — [`HD10447`](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html) *Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader* (Patrik Lundqvist, S → Energi- och näringsminister Ebba Busch, KD) — should be framed as the **anchor of a three-week S-opposition interpellation campaign** on SME-cost and labour-market issues rather than a standalone procedural filing. Evidence: 12 of 16 interpellations in the HD10428–HD10447 window (75%) are S-filed; at least 4 (HD10443 social dumping, HD10444 *arbetsgivaravgifter* loopholes, HD10446 false death declarations, HD10447 sick-pay) target labour/social-protection policy.
 
-## DIW-weighted ranking
+### DIW-weighted ranking
 
 | Rank | `dok_id` | Title | DIW | Horizon | Rationale |
 |:-:|---|---|:-:|---|---|
@@ -102,14 +100,14 @@ The single new interpellation announced in chamber today — [`HD10447`](https:/
 
 DIW inputs: document-type weight (interpellation = 0.4 base) × ministerial-seniority weight (Energy/Industry = high for SME issues, 1.4) × electoral-horizon multiplier (1.1 for SME economics) × stakeholder-concentration factor (1.0).
 
-## Integrated intelligence picture
+### Integrated intelligence picture
 
 1. **Opposition strategy** — S is using the interpellation tool (low legislative cost, public chamber answer) to force televised ministerial accountability on **SME cost structure** in the five-month window before the September 2026 election. The HD10447 text explicitly frames Sweden's post-2023 underperformance vs EU growth as partly attributable to the government's removal of the sick-pay reimbursement.
 2. **Minister exposure** — Ebba Busch (KD), as Energy- och näringsminister, personally owns both the SME narrative and (via the 2024 budget decision) the removal of the reimbursement. Answering on 2026-05-07 she will be forced to either defend the 2024 decision, promise a review, or signal no change. All three answers have electoral costs.
 3. **Structural context** — Small-business sick-pay burden has been studied by Tillväxtverket and Svenskt Näringsliv for two decades. The 2016–2024 *ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader* was the main state-borne mitigation. Abolishing it shifted ~SEK 1–1.5 bn/year of risk onto employers (baseline estimate, 2023 budget bill impact assessment).
 4. **Pattern signal** — Interpellation volume from S is rising: 12 in 3 weeks is above the 2025/26 session average (~3/week from S). This is consistent with a pre-summer accountability push targeting the autumn budget debate.
 
-## Recommended article framing
+### Recommended article framing
 
 - **Lede**: HD10447 as anchor + cluster-level take on the S economic campaign.
 - **Nut graf**: Why the 2024 reimbursement removal is back on the agenda now.
@@ -117,13 +115,13 @@ DIW inputs: document-type weight (interpellation = 0.4 base) × ministerial-seni
 - **Section 3**: Broader interpellation pattern (HD10428–HD10447) — 12/16 S-filed, showing opposition's use of the tool.
 - **Section 4**: Election-2026 linkage — SME-cost wedge as one of five emerging S campaign themes.
 
-## AI-Recommended article metadata
+### AI-Recommended article metadata
 
 - **Headline** (EN, 68 chars): "Opposition reopens Sweden's sick-pay reimbursement fight ahead of 2026"
 - **Headline** (SV, 76 chars): "Oppositionen återöppnar striden om ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader"
 - **Meta description** (EN, 156 chars): "Socialdemokraten Patrik Lundqvist has filed interpellation HD10447, pressing Minister Ebba Busch (KD) to review the 2024 abolition of SME sick-pay aid."
 
-## Visual
+### Visual
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TB
@@ -144,7 +142,7 @@ flowchart TB
   style E fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - HD10447 full text: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html> (A2)
 - HD10428–HD10447 interpellation set: `get_interpellationer` batch, 2026-04-24 (A2)
@@ -153,12 +151,11 @@ flowchart TB
 ---
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Standing PIRs addressed**: PIR-2 (legislative activity), PIR-3 (opposition coordination), PIR-5 (pre-election narrative formation), PIR-6 (coalition fissures).
 
-## Key Judgment 1 — Coordinated S campaign (Confidence: **HIGH**)
+### Key Judgment 1 — Coordinated S campaign (Confidence: **HIGH**)
 
 S is waging a pre-budget and pre-election coordinated interpellation campaign on SME / labour-cost policy, of which HD10447 is the fourth labour-policy filing in three weeks. *[Source: internal cluster HD10428–HD10447 · Admiralty A2 · cluster count 12/16 S-filed]*
 
@@ -167,7 +164,7 @@ S is waging a pre-budget and pre-election coordinated interpellation campaign on
 - **Sensitivity**: Low — judgment holds even if HD10447 alone were isolated; the cluster is independently attested.
 - **Addresses**: PIR-3 (opposition coordination), PIR-5.
 
-## Key Judgment 2 — Minister likely to defend (Confidence: **MEDIUM-HIGH**)
+### Key Judgment 2 — Minister likely to defend (Confidence: **MEDIUM-HIGH**)
 
 Minister Busch is most likely (50% + 20% = 70%) to respond with either a full defence (Scenario 1) or a partial-review offer (Scenario 2) on 2026-05-07, not a reinstatement signal. *[Source: 2022–2025 Tidö IP answers pattern · A2]*
 
@@ -176,7 +173,7 @@ Minister Busch is most likely (50% + 20% = 70%) to respond with either a full de
 - **Sensitivity**: Medium — a surprise review offer would flip S's rhetorical payoff.
 - **Addresses**: PIR-2, PIR-5.
 
-## Key Judgment 3 — KD brand vulnerability (Confidence: **MEDIUM**)
+### Key Judgment 3 — KD brand vulnerability (Confidence: **MEDIUM**)
 
 KD carries asymmetric political risk from HD10447: its "*företagens parti*" self-branding is tested by a policy its minister implemented. A visible misstep — even absent coalition fracture — hands S a lasting rhetorical asset. *[Source: 2022 KD manifesto + 2024 abolition timeline · A2]*
 
@@ -185,7 +182,7 @@ KD carries asymmetric political risk from HD10447: its "*företagens parti*" sel
 - **Sensitivity**: High — depends on whether press picks up the story.
 - **Addresses**: PIR-5, PIR-6.
 
-## Key Judgment 4 — Narrow policy-surprise window (Confidence: **LOW-MEDIUM**)
+### Key Judgment 4 — Narrow policy-surprise window (Confidence: **LOW-MEDIUM**)
 
 There is a narrow (10–15%) window in which HD10447 catalyses either a formal review or informal KD policy drift (Scenarios 2+4 cumulative = 30%). Window closes after 2026-05-07 answer.
 
@@ -194,7 +191,7 @@ There is a narrow (10–15%) window in which HD10447 catalyses either a formal r
 - **Sensitivity**: Very High — small evidence shifts move probability markedly.
 - **Addresses**: PIR-2, PIR-6.
 
-## Information gaps / collection requirements
+### Information gaps / collection requirements
 
 | Gap | Collection action | By when |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -203,36 +200,35 @@ There is a narrow (10–15%) window in which HD10447 catalyses either a formal r
 | Additional S interpellations on SME labour cost | Daily riksdag-regering poll for `parti:S iid:SME` | daily |
 | Regeringen internal M-KD positioning | Not publicly observable — caveat | — |
 
-## Alternative analysis (Devil's Advocate summary)
+### Alternative analysis (Devil's Advocate summary)
 
 See `devils-advocate.md`. Alternative framings H2 (constituency-driven) and H3 (KD-fracture signalling) scored lower but remain logged; rebase if coordination signals fail to emerge by 2026-05-06.
 
-## Confidence scale legend
+### Confidence scale legend
 
 - **VERY HIGH**: convergent high-quality A1 sources; multi-method corroboration.
 - **HIGH**: strong A2 sources + internally-consistent pattern; independent corroboration.
 - **MEDIUM-HIGH / MEDIUM**: partial corroboration or base-rate extrapolation.
 - **LOW-MEDIUM / LOW**: single source or speculative inference.
 
-## Consistency & change
+### Consistency & change
 
 Consistent with `historical-parallels.md` pattern of pre-election S wedge campaigns. Material change if 2026-05-07 answer is a review signal — rebase Judgments 2 and 3.
 
 ---
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Method**: DIW weighting (Data-Importance-Weight) per [`ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md) §DIW.
 
-## Ranking
+### Ranking
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title (shortened) | DIW | Tier | Rationale |
 |:-:|---|---|:-:|:-:|---|
 | 1 | [HD10447](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html) | Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader | **0.62** | L2+ Priority | Only new IP today; reopens a 2024 fiscal decision with measurable SME impact; directly cites Sweden-vs-EU growth gap; wedge-ready |
 
-## DIW breakdown — HD10447
+### DIW breakdown — HD10447
 
 | Factor | Weight | Value | Contribution |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -245,13 +241,13 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 Base 0.40 → adjusted 0.62 after multipliers. Keeps item inside the L2+ Priority tier.
 
-## Sensitivity
+### Sensitivity
 
 - If the minister's 2026-05-07 answer signals review → DIW rises to ~0.75 (L3 Intelligence-grade).
 - If the answer is flat refusal with no new data → DIW drops back to 0.48 (L2 Strategic).
 - If S escalates with a motion before 2026-06-21 session-end → cluster DIW rises to 0.82 (L3).
 
-## Cluster-level scoring (contextual)
+### Cluster-level scoring (contextual)
 
 | Cluster (HD10428–HD10447 window) | Member dok_ids | Cluster DIW | Tier |
 |---|---|:-:|:-:|
@@ -260,14 +256,14 @@ Base 0.40 → adjusted 0.62 after multipliers. Keeps item inside the L2+ Priorit
 | Security / policing | HD10439 Stockholm police shortage (S, 04-20) | 0.62 | L2+ |
 | Healthcare | HD10432 · HD10442 (S, 04-15/21) | 0.55 | L2 |
 
-## Priority signal — bullet ranking
+### Priority signal — bullet ranking
 
 1. [HD10447](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html) — *Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader*, DIW 0.62 — wedge-ready (A2).
 2. HD10444 — *Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter*, DIW 0.55 — complementary SME-cost IP (A2), source: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html>.
 3. HD10439 — *Brist på poliser i Stockholm*, DIW 0.62 — separate salience axis (A2), source: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10439.html>.
 4. HD10443 — *Social dumpning mellan kommuner*, DIW 0.48 — labour cluster (A2), source: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443.html>.
 
-## Visual
+### Visual
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -285,7 +281,7 @@ flowchart LR
   style CL1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html> (A2, primary)
 - <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html> (A2)
@@ -295,42 +291,41 @@ flowchart LR
 ---
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 **Subject**: Likely media frames for HD10447 and the cluster campaign.
 
-## Frame candidates
+### Frame candidates
 
-### Frame A — "Regeringen tog bort stödet — och företagen lider" (S-preferred)
+#### Frame A — "Regeringen tog bort stödet — och företagen lider" (S-preferred)
 
 S narrative frame. Emphasises small-business pain, Swedish growth gap vs EU, KD's "*företagens parti*" contradiction.
 
 - **Outlets most likely to carry**: Dagens Arbete, ETC, Aftonbladet (ledar), Arbetet.
 - **Amplifiers**: Företagarna partial amplification (if they pick the business-cost angle without partisan tie-in).
 
-### Frame B — "Effektiviserad företagshjälp — inget att ångra" (Tidö-preferred)
+#### Frame B — "Effektiviserad företagshjälp — inget att ångra" (Tidö-preferred)
 
 Government counter-frame. Emphasises other measures (arbetsgivaravgifter-sänkningar, växa-stöd), administrativ förenkling.
 
 - **Outlets most likely to carry**: Svenska Dagbladet (borgerlig ledar), Expressen ledar, Bulletin.
 - **Amplifiers**: Skattebetalarnas förening, Timbro.
 
-### Frame C — "En kostnad man inte räknat på" (neutral/wonkish)
+#### Frame C — "En kostnad man inte räknat på" (neutral/wonkish)
 
 Analytical / data-centric frame. Cites SCB data, Tillväxtverket rapporter, Finanspolitiska rådet.
 
 - **Outlets most likely to carry**: Dagens industri, Dagens Nyheter economy section, Sveriges Radio Ekonomiekot.
 - **Amplifiers**: Academic economists; think tanks.
 
-### Frame D — "Sverige ut ur Norden" (comparative)
+#### Frame D — "Sverige ut ur Norden" (comparative)
 
 Comparative/Nordic frame — Sweden as Nordic outlier on SME-sick-pay buffer.
 
 - **Outlets most likely to carry**: Nordic-oriented outlets, Europaportalen, Altinget.
 - **Amplifiers**: Nordic labour-market researchers.
 
-## Frame volume forecast (7-day horizon from 2026-05-07)
+### Frame volume forecast (7-day horizon from 2026-05-07)
 
 ```mermaid
 xychart-beta
@@ -345,7 +340,7 @@ xychart-beta
 
 Legend (line order): A (S-frame) · B (Tidö-frame) · C (wonkish) · D (comparative).
 
-## Narrative contestation matrix
+### Narrative contestation matrix
 
 | Frame | Source authority (Admiralty) | Public resonance | Policy-shift leverage |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -354,30 +349,29 @@ Legend (line order): A (S-frame) · B (Tidö-frame) · C (wonkish) · D (compara
 | C — wonkish | A2–B1 | LOW-MEDIUM | HIGH (drives review scenarios) |
 | D — comparative | A1 | LOW (abstract) | MEDIUM (intellectual asset for opposition) |
 
-## Disinformation / manipulation risk
+### Disinformation / manipulation risk
 
 - **Statistics cherry-picking**: both sides likely to cherry-pick start/end years on sick-leave cost trends. Standard political-communication pattern; no evidence of malicious disinformation.
 - **Deepfake / synthetic media**: none detected in prior Tidö-opposition exchanges on this issue; residual baseline risk.
 
-## Recommended narrative-monitoring indicators
+### Recommended narrative-monitoring indicators
 
 - Word-frequency tracking on Mediearkivet: "sjuklönekostnad" · "småföretag" · "företagens parti" · "sjuklön".
 - Lead-editorial endorsements DN, SvD, Expressen, Aftonbladet D0–D3.
 - Social-media amplification: @socialdemokraterna, @kd, @SvensktNLiv accounts.
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM** — frame typology is grounded in past cluster-campaigns (B2); specific volume forecast is indicative (C3 model output).
 
 ---
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Subject**: HD10447 *Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader*. **Lens**: 6-lens stakeholder matrix per [`stakeholder-impact.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md).
 
-## 6-lens matrix
+### 6-lens matrix
 
 | Lens | Stakeholder | Position | Influence | Evidence |
 |---|---|---|:-:|---|
@@ -395,13 +389,13 @@ _Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonit
 | 6. International | **OECD** | Historically flagged SME sick-pay burden as growth-sensitive | MEDIUM | OECD Economic Survey: Sweden 2023 (A1) <https://www.oecd.org/> |
 | 6. International | **EU Commission** | Monitors Swedish fiscal-policy trajectory; no direct line on sick-pay | LOW | European Semester 2025 report (A1) |
 
-## Named actors (summary)
+### Named actors (summary)
 
 - **Patrik Lundqvist (S)** — interpellation filer, labour-market focus.
 - **Ebba Busch (KD)** — Energy & Industry Minister, KD party leader since 2015.
 - **Elisabeth Svantesson (M)** — Finance Minister, fiscal-rule custodian.
 
-## Influence network
+### Influence network
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -422,7 +416,7 @@ flowchart LR
   style S_party fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Winners / losers matrix
+### Winners / losers matrix
 
 | Actor | If minister refuses review | If minister announces review |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -432,31 +426,30 @@ flowchart LR
 | LO | Neutral | Indirect win (worker protection) |
 | M / Svantesson | Fiscal-rule held | Potential fiscal-rule friction |
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM** — named stakeholders and their historical positions are well-documented; individual response calibration awaits the 2026-05-07 answer.
 
 ---
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: Dated, observable indicators that will update probability estimates across scenarios. 4 horizons: 72h · week · month · election.
 
-## Horizon 1 — Next 72h (through 2026-04-27)
+### Horizon 1 — Next 72h (through 2026-04-27)
 
 1. **2026-04-25**: Additional S interpellation on labour-cost or SME theme filed. (Tests H1 coordinated campaign.) Source: data.riksdagen.se/dokumentstatus daily poll.
 2. **2026-04-26**: Företagarna or Svenskt Näringsliv public comment on the abolition or HD10447. Source: organization press pages.
 3. **2026-04-27**: First national press reference to HD10447 (Mediearkivet scan). Absence = lower H1 weight.
 
-## Horizon 2 — Next 7 days (through 2026-05-01)
+### Horizon 2 — Next 7 days (through 2026-05-01)
 
 4. **2026-04-29**: S front-bench coordinated statement or op-ed on SME costs. Presence → reinforces H1; absence → shift toward H2.
 5. **2026-04-30**: KD internal signalling (KD MP op-ed, Företagarna survey release). Presence → reinforces H3 KD-fracture.
 6. **2026-05-01**: Total count of S labour-cost IPs filed April 2026. Threshold: ≥ 6 = clear coordinated campaign; 3–5 = ambiguous; ≤ 2 = weak H1.
 
-## Horizon 3 — Month window (through 2026-05-24)
+### Horizon 3 — Month window (through 2026-05-24)
 
 7. **2026-05-07**: **SISVA — Minister Busch answers HD10447.** Pivotal indicator. Keyword scan of the answer for: "*översyn*", "*utvärdering*", "*Tillväxtverket*" (→ Scenario 2), "*överskottsmålet*", "*Finanspolitiska rådet*" (→ Scenario 3), "*förenklat*", "*växa-stöd*" (→ Scenario 1).
 8. **2026-05-08**: Media coverage volume D+1 after answer (target: ≥ 5 national outlets = narrative capture; ≤ 2 = frame failed).
@@ -464,7 +457,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 10. **2026-05-20**: Tidö budget-signal leak or FI spring proposition contains any mitigating SME measure.
 11. **2026-05-24**: 4-week polling update: S vs Tidö delta movement. Baseline delta currently +5 pp red-green; > +6 pp = HD10447 cluster landing; < +4 pp = narrative stalled.
 
-## Horizon 4 — Election window (through 2026-09-13)
+### Horizon 4 — Election window (through 2026-09-13)
 
 12. **2026-06-18**: Riksdagens sommaruppehåll begins — narrative locks for summer. Track final positions of all actors heading into recess.
 13. **2026-07Q3**: Sommaravtal (party summer agreements / pre-campaign positioning). Watch for S manifesto inclusion.
@@ -472,7 +465,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 15. **2026-08-31**: Late-summer polling snapshot: KD vs 4% threshold (existential for Tidö); S vs 35% (outright-majority reach).
 16. **2026-09-13**: **Valdag — seat allocation**. Ex-post test of voter-segmentation.md shift predictions.
 
-## Indicator tracking matrix
+### Indicator tracking matrix
 
 | # | Indicator | Horizon | Probability-moves scenario | Direction |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -489,26 +482,25 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | 15 | KD 4% threshold | election | coalition-math | existential |
 | 16 | Valdag | election | ex-post | final |
 
-## Expected update frequency
+### Expected update frequency
 
 - Indicators 1–3: poll daily.
 - Indicators 4–6: weekly poll.
 - Indicators 7–11: event-driven; auto-trigger on 2026-05-07 answer publication.
 - Indicators 12–16: monthly cadence through Sep 2026.
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM-HIGH** on indicator specification (observable, dated, falsifiable). **LOW-MEDIUM** on implied probability updates (subject to news-cycle noise).
 
 ---
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Subject**: Possible outcomes from HD10447 between 2026-05-07 (SISVA) and the 2026-09-13 general election. **Method**: 4 distinct scenarios, probabilities sum to 100%, leading indicator per scenario.
 
-## Scenario 1 — "Defensive defend" (P = 50%)
+### Scenario 1 — "Defensive defend" (P = 50%)
 
 Minister Busch answers on 2026-05-07 defending the 2024 abolition, citing offsetting measures (arbetsgivaravgifter reductions, växa-stöd). No policy change; brief media cycle.
 
@@ -516,7 +508,7 @@ Minister Busch answers on 2026-05-07 defending the 2024 abolition, citing offset
 - **Second-order**: S files a motion in autumn 2026 budget round; narrative persists but narrow audience.
 - **Election impact**: Neutral for Tidö; marginal S gain in SME-owner cohort.
 
-## Scenario 2 — "Partial review opens" (P = 20%)
+### Scenario 2 — "Partial review opens" (P = 20%)
 
 Minister signals a Tillväxtverket-led review of effects on micro-firms (< 10 employees). Plays as partial S win, partial KD de-escalation.
 
@@ -524,7 +516,7 @@ Minister signals a Tillväxtverket-led review of effects on micro-firms (< 10 em
 - **Second-order**: Review terms released within 60 days; industry federations publish input.
 - **Election impact**: KD neutralises wedge; S loses unique-ownership claim.
 
-## Scenario 3 — "Fiscal-rule wall" (P = 20%)
+### Scenario 3 — "Fiscal-rule wall" (P = 20%)
 
 Minister — likely backed by Finance Minister Svantesson — answers with a firm fiscal-rule line: no reinstatement path compatible with overskottsmålet at current trajectory. Harder defensive tone than Scenario 1.
 
@@ -532,7 +524,7 @@ Minister — likely backed by Finance Minister Svantesson — answers with a fir
 - **Second-order**: S escalates with a co-signed motion invoking V or C to split the fiscal-rule argument.
 - **Election impact**: Polarises electorate on fiscal-rule question itself; risk for both sides.
 
-## Scenario 4 — "Coalition drift on KD" (P = 10%)
+### Scenario 4 — "Coalition drift on KD" (P = 10%)
 
 KD internal business-base pressure (Företagarna, SME owners) produces a quiet policy realignment: partial reinstatement floated informally via KD MPs, even without a formal minister commitment.
 
@@ -540,7 +532,7 @@ KD internal business-base pressure (Företagarna, SME owners) produces a quiet p
 - **Second-order**: Tidö internal negotiation — M / SD resist; public friction visible in press.
 - **Election impact**: High — exposes Tidö internal divergence on SME policy, core KD brand risk.
 
-## Probability table
+### Probability table
 
 | Scenario | P | Cumulative |
 |---|:-:|:-:|
@@ -549,7 +541,7 @@ KD internal business-base pressure (Företagarna, SME owners) produces a quiet p
 | 3 Fiscal-rule wall | 20% | 90% |
 | 4 Coalition drift on KD | 10% | 100% |
 
-## Visual
+### Visual
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -568,7 +560,7 @@ graph TD
   style S4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Key Assumptions Check
+### Key Assumptions Check
 
 | Assumption | Risk if wrong |
 |---|---|
@@ -576,19 +568,18 @@ graph TD
 | FI fiscal path unchanged by then | Low — no BP revision expected before May |
 | No cross-opposition co-signing before May | Medium — V could still co-file supporting IPs |
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM** — scenarios reflect the observable distribution of past ministerial answers on reopened budget decisions (base-rate ~60% defensive, ~20% partial review, ~15% fiscal-rule wall, ~5% coalition drift based on 2022–2025 IP archive).
 
 ---
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Subject**: Risks triggered by HD10447 and the wider S-opposition interpellation campaign. **Method**: 5-dimension register (Political / Economic / Institutional / Social / Reputational), L × I scoring.
 
-## Risk register
+### Risk register
 
 | # | Dimension | Risk | Likelihood (1–5) | Impact (1–5) | Score | Evidence |
 |:-:|---|---|:-:|:-:|:-:|---|
@@ -598,7 +589,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R4 | Social | SME hiring behaviour remains depressed through 2026 H2, reinforcing S claim empirically | 3 | 3 | 9 | SCB arbetsmarknad 2025 Q4 (A2) <https://www.scb.se/> |
 | R5 | Reputational | KD loses credibility on pro-business narrative among SME owners | 3 | 3 | 9 | Företagarna 2024 position paper (A2) |
 
-## Cascading chains
+### Cascading chains
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -616,7 +607,7 @@ flowchart LR
   style EL fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Posterior probabilities (Bayesian updates)
+### Posterior probabilities (Bayesian updates)
 
 | Event | Prior P | Posterior P (given HD10447) | Δ |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -625,25 +616,24 @@ flowchart LR
 | SME-cost wedge enters top-5 S campaign themes | 0.50 | **0.75** | +0.25 |
 | Cross-opposition IP co-signing in next 30 days | 0.20 | 0.25 | +0.05 |
 
-## Mitigations (for an observer, not a partisan stance)
+### Mitigations (for an observer, not a partisan stance)
 
 - Track SCB arbetsmarknad + företagsdynamik releases monthly to empirically test the growth-drag claim.
 - Monitor 2026-05-07 response verbatim (chamber transcript) for *review / oversight* keywords.
 - Watch BP2026/27 autumn proposition draft for reinstatement language.
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM** — single new document today but rich historical record (2016–2024 programme) and strong cluster context. Admiralty `A2` for all primary sources.
 
 ---
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md)_
+### S / W / O / T
 
-## S / W / O / T
-
-### Strengths (of the opposition's position on HD10447)
+#### Strengths (of the opposition's position on HD10447)
 
 - **Concrete fiscal reference point** — the 2016–2024 *ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader* is a documented, costed programme (SEK 1.0–1.5 bn/year) — not abstract rhetoric. Evidence: HD10447 text paragraph 2, <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html> (A2).
 - **Coalitional arithmetic** — pressure targets KD specifically, stressing the junior Tidö partner most sensitive to SME narrative. Evidence: `HD10447` addressed directly to Busch (KD).
@@ -655,7 +645,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Targets junior Tidö partner (KD) | HD10447 addressee metadata (A2) |
 | Coordinated opposition pattern | 12/16 S-filed IPs in HD10428–HD10447 window (A2) |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 - **Low legislative velocity** — an interpellation cannot amend or repeal; it produces a response on the floor, nothing more. Evidence: Riksdagsordningen 8 kap. (A1) <https://riksdagen.se/>.
 - **No alternative financing** — HD10447 asks the minister to "see over" the issue but proposes no S alternative funding source. Evidence: text paragraph 6 of `HD10447` (A2).
@@ -667,7 +657,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | No funding alternative | HD10447 text, final paragraph (A2) |
 | Single signatory | HD10447 metadata (A2) |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 - **May 2026 answer** as a televised setpiece (2026-05-07 SISVA). Evidence: HD10447 workflow *SISVA: 2026-05-07* (A2). Source: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html>.
 - **Budget-debate linkage** — reopens a 2024 decision, enabling S to loop it into the autumn 2026/27 budget proposal (BP). Evidence: pattern of S budget amendments cataloged at <https://www.regeringen.se/> (A2).
@@ -679,7 +669,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Budget-round re-entry | 2024 budget bill record <https://www.regeringen.se/> (A2) |
 | SME lobby alignment | 2024 consultation submissions <https://www.regeringen.se/> (A2) |
 
-### Threats (to the opposition's position)
+#### Threats (to the opposition's position)
 
 - **Government counter-framing** — Busch can pivot to ongoing *arbetsgivaravgifter* reductions for young workers and argue the net burden fell. Evidence: 2024 budget bill <https://www.regeringen.se/> (A2).
 - **Fiscal constraint line** — Finance Minister Svantesson (M) can frame reinstatement as incompatible with FI's fiscal targets. Evidence: Finanspolitiska rådet 2025 report <https://www.finanspolitiskaradet.se/> (A2).
@@ -691,19 +681,19 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | FI fiscal-rule line | Finanspolitiska rådet 2025 report (A2) |
 | IP-topic dilution | HD10444 at <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html> (A2) |
 
-## TOWS matrix
+### TOWS matrix
 
 | | Strengths | Weaknesses |
 |---|---|---|
 | **Opportunities** | **SO:** Use the televised 2026-05-07 answer to loop the SME-cost claim into the BP2026/27 debate. | **WO:** Co-sign with V and MP ahead of budget round to multiply pressure. |
 | **Threats** | **ST:** Pre-empt minister counter-frame by citing FR 2025 own assessment of SME cost-sensitivity. | **WT:** Narrow HD10447 narrative to differentiate from HD10444 to avoid dilution. |
 
-## Cross-SWOT
+### Cross-SWOT
 
 - S-Strength 1 ↔ O-Opportunity 2: documented cost base directly supports a budget-round amendment. Evidence: HD10447 + 2024 BP record.
 - W-Weakness 1 ↔ T-Threat 2: procedural ceiling + FI constraint compound into a "symbolic-only" outcome unless paired with a BP motion.
 
-## Visual
+### Visual
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -727,8 +717,7 @@ quadrantChart
 ---
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Frame**: Political-threat taxonomy applied to HD10447 as an opposition accountability instrument. **Method**: [`political-threat-framework.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md) + lightweight MITRE-style TTP mapping for political action.
 
@@ -736,7 +725,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 
 > **Scope note**: "Threat" in this political intelligence context means *actions that may degrade the governing coalition's electoral and legislative standing*, not cyber/physical threats. The subject is a legitimate, constitutionally-sanctioned instrument (interpellation). This analysis is descriptive, neutral, and public-source only.
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy hits
+### Political Threat Taxonomy hits
 
 | Category | Observed? | Evidence |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -747,7 +736,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | Disinformation | NO | Claims are verifiable against 2024 BP record |
 | Procedural obstruction | NO | Single IP does not block legislation |
 
-## Attack tree (political-action tree)
+### Attack tree (political-action tree)
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -770,7 +759,7 @@ graph TD
   style A1x fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Chain of political-communications stages
+### Chain of political-communications stages
 
 | Stage | Activity | HD10447 observation |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -782,7 +771,7 @@ graph TD
 | Command & Control | Campaign coordination with parallel IPs, press, budget round | HD10444 companion filed; BP2026/27 pipeline |
 | Actions on objective | Vote-share shift on SME-cost axis | Polling Nov 2025 through Sep 2026 |
 
-## MITRE-style TTP annotation (informal, political-action analogue)
+### MITRE-style TTP annotation (informal, political-action analogue)
 
 | TTP (political) | Observed | Reference |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -792,13 +781,13 @@ graph TD
 | T4: Cross-opposition coalition (multi-party co-signing) | NO | Single signatory |
 | T5: Budget-amendment follow-through | PENDING | Watch BP2026/27 |
 
-## Counter-posture (government side)
+### Counter-posture (government side)
 
 - **CT-1** — Minister prepares data-backed response citing *arbetsgivaravgifter* reductions for young workers and net SME burden change.
 - **CT-2** — Finance ministry publishes budget-rule line: "no reinstatement compatible with FI framework at current fiscal path".
 - **CT-3** — KD-specific messaging emphasises SME-growth measures already implemented (for example *växa-stöd*).
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM** — reasoning from a single new document plus 3-week cluster; baseline supported by open parliamentary archive.
 
@@ -807,8 +796,7 @@ graph TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD10447
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10447-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10447-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md -->
 
 **Document**: HD10447 — *Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader*
 **Type**: Interpellation
@@ -817,7 +805,7 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD10447-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Filed**: 2026-04-23 · **SISVA**: 2026-05-07
 **Primary source**: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447> (Admiralty A1)
 
-## Document summary
+### Document summary
 
 Lundqvist asks Minister Busch:
 
@@ -826,7 +814,7 @@ Lundqvist asks Minister Busch:
 
 Framing: Sweden's growth gap vs EU, SME employment importance, abolition cost borne specifically by small firms.
 
-## Classification (7-dimension)
+### Classification (7-dimension)
 
 | Dimension | Value |
 |---|---|
@@ -838,7 +826,7 @@ Framing: Sweden's growth gap vs EU, SME employment importance, abolition cost bo
 | Geografisk räckvidd | National, with Gävleborg constituency amplification |
 | Admiralty rating | A1 |
 
-## DIW weighting
+### DIW weighting
 
 | Dimension | Score (1-5) | Weight | Contribution |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -851,43 +839,43 @@ Framing: Sweden's growth gap vs EU, SME employment importance, abolition cost bo
 
 Cluster-adjusted: +0.5 for campaign membership → **3.85** (above analysis threshold of 3.0).
 
-## SWOT (one-pager)
+### SWOT (one-pager)
 
 - **S**: Concrete policy target, KD-specific addressee, cluster coherence.
 - **W**: Single signatory, no press tie-in, soft evidence on SME growth-gap causation.
 - **O**: Pre-election window; KD brand vulnerability; Nordic comparative framing.
 - **T**: Minister defensive reply (70% likely); fiscal-rule wall; S over-reach if overplayed.
 
-## Risk posture
+### Risk posture
 
 Low procedural risk; medium political risk for KD (brand); low risk for S (downside: narrative fails to land).
 
-## Stakeholder map (abbreviated)
+### Stakeholder map (abbreviated)
 
 - **Patrik Lundqvist (S)**: Gävleborg MP; prior labour-policy IPs. Motivation: constituency SME service + party alignment.
 - **Ebba Busch (KD)**: Must answer personally; brand risk; likely defensive answer.
 - **Företagarna**: Potential amplifier; brand-aligned with S framing on this issue.
 - **Finance Minister Svantesson (M)**: Non-addressee but fiscal backstop; may signal through written press.
 
-## Scenario routing (links to folder-level `scenario-analysis.md`)
+### Scenario routing (links to folder-level `scenario-analysis.md`)
 
 - S1 Defensive defend — 50% — Busch answer cites växa-stöd / arbetsgivaravgifter
 - S2 Partial review — 20% — Tillväxtverket review signalled
 - S3 Fiscal-rule wall — 20% — överskottsmål cited
 - S4 Coalition drift — 10% — KD-internal movement
 
-## Key Judgment (document-level)
+### Key Judgment (document-level)
 
 HD10447 is a credible, well-targeted opposition interpellation functioning as a **narrative-capture instrument**, not a realistic policy-change lever. Expected outcome: narrative gain for S, minor brand cost for KD, no policy change in the 2026–2026 mandate period. **Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH.**
 
-## Cross-references
+### Cross-references
 
 - Folder index: `../README.md`
 - Cluster context: `../cross-reference-map.md`
 - Scenario probabilities: `../scenario-analysis.md`
 - Election impact: `../election-2026-analysis.md`
 
-## Source summary
+### Source summary
 
 | Source | URL | Admiralty |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -899,12 +887,11 @@ HD10447 is a credible, well-targeted opposition interpellation functioning as a
 ---
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Context**: Swedish general election 2026-09-13 — ~20 weeks from analysis date. HD10447 lands mid-pre-campaign window where narrative positioning hardens before summer recess.
 
-## Pre-campaign timeline
+### Pre-campaign timeline
 
 ```mermaid
 timeline
@@ -916,7 +903,7 @@ timeline
   2026-09-13 : Valdag
 ```
 
-## Polling baseline (April 2026, aggregated Novus + SCB + Demoskop)
+### Polling baseline (April 2026, aggregated Novus + SCB + Demoskop)
 
 | Party | 2025H2 avg | 2026Q1 avg | Trend | 2022 result |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -931,25 +918,25 @@ timeline
 
 **Coalition math**: Tidö (M+SD+KD+L) = 45% (down from ~49% at 2022 election). S+MP+V+C = 50%. KD/L sit at or near 4% threshold — existential risk.
 
-## HD10447 impact vectors
+### HD10447 impact vectors
 
-### Vector 1 — SME-owner cohort (~240k eligible voters; est. 4.1% of electorate)
+#### Vector 1 — SME-owner cohort (~240k eligible voters; est. 4.1% of electorate)
 
 Most directly targeted by the narrative. 2022 split ~35% KD/M, ~20% S. A 5-percentage-point KD/M→S shift in this cohort = ~12k votes nationally, ~0.2% absolute.
 
-### Vector 2 — SME employees (~1.2M voters; est. 20% of electorate)
+#### Vector 2 — SME employees (~1.2M voters; est. 20% of electorate)
 
 Indirect — narrative of "unstable employer" and "labour-insecurity" plays here. Small but non-zero shift possible; base-rate ~2 pp shifts in similar past wedge campaigns.
 
-### Vector 3 — Rural Gävleborg / northern industrial belt
+#### Vector 3 — Rural Gävleborg / northern industrial belt
 
 Lundqvist's home base. Visible constituency service amplifies S local brand; marginal seat impact in valkrets Gävleborg (≈5 S mandat, 2 M, 1 SD at current aggregate).
 
-### Vector 4 — KD brand damage (no new voters; existential cost)
+#### Vector 4 — KD brand damage (no new voters; existential cost)
 
 If KD drops below 4%, entire Tidö coalition math collapses (no cabinet). This makes the marginal cost of HD10447 to KD disproportionately high relative to the marginal benefit to S.
 
-## Wedge-axis assessment
+### Wedge-axis assessment
 
 | Axis | Strength | Why |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -958,30 +945,29 @@ If KD drops below 4%, entire Tidö coalition math collapses (no cabinet). This m
 | Welfare / fairness | LOW-MEDIUM | Not the core S frame here — more "competence" angle |
 | Fiscal responsibility | MEDIUM | Counter-frame available to Tidö; risk cuts both ways |
 
-## Election impact — most-likely case (combining scenarios)
+### Election impact — most-likely case (combining scenarios)
 
 **Weighted expected shift**: S +0.1 to +0.3 pp nationally; KD −0.1 to −0.4 pp. Small in isolation. **Cumulative effect matters**: HD10447 is 1 of an expected 12–15 S wedge IPs this cycle; stacked effect could reach 1.5–2.5 pp.
 
-## Recommended indicator set (feeds forward-indicators.md)
+### Recommended indicator set (feeds forward-indicators.md)
 
 - Weekly polling delta Tidö vs red-green bloc
 - KD small-business cohort favourability (Företagarna surveys)
 - Volume of S labour-policy IPs by week (target: 2–3 per week through June)
 - Regeringen press responses mentioning "företagare" / "småföretag"
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM** — polling baseline and cohort math are A2; attribution of individual IP to measurable shift is B3 (base-rate extrapolation).
 
 ---
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 **Frame**: Current Riksdag (2022–2026) 349 seats. Tidö = M + SD + KD + L. Red-green opposition = S + MP + V + C.
 
-## Current seat distribution (post-2022 val, adjusted through 2026-04)
+### Current seat distribution (post-2022 val, adjusted through 2026-04)
 
 | Party | Seats | Bloc |
 |---|---:|---|
@@ -997,7 +983,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 **Majority**: 175 seats. Tidö: 176 (M 68 + SD 73 + KD 19 + L 16). Opposition: 173 (S 107 + V 24 + C 24 + MP 18) — note C is not in the Tidö agreement but votes case-by-case; excluded from Tidö.
 
-## Hypothetical vote on a HD10447-derived motion
+### Hypothetical vote on a HD10447-derived motion
 
 Assume S files a motion proposing partial reinstatement of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader. Probable vote breakdown:
 
@@ -1015,9 +1001,9 @@ Assume S files a motion proposing partial reinstatement of ersättning för hög
 
 Outcome: **Avslag** (Tidö 176 vs Opposition 167). Motion fails on coalition discipline alone.
 
-## Fissure scenarios
+### Fissure scenarios
 
-### Fissure A — KD defection (2 KD MPs abstain)
+#### Fissure A — KD defection (2 KD MPs abstain)
 
 | Parti | Ja | Nej | Avstår |
 |---|---:|---:|---:|
@@ -1027,7 +1013,7 @@ Outcome: **Avslag** (Tidö 176 vs Opposition 167). Motion fails on coalition dis
 
 Even 2 KD abstentions don't flip the vote. KD brand harm outpaces vote-level impact.
 
-### Fissure B — Full KD breaks (entire KD 19 votes Ja)
+#### Fissure B — Full KD breaks (entire KD 19 votes Ja)
 
 | Parti | Ja | Nej | Avstår |
 |---|---:|---:|---:|
@@ -1037,7 +1023,7 @@ Even 2 KD abstentions don't flip the vote. KD brand harm outpaces vote-level imp
 
 Full KD defection flips the vote but is politically implausible — would trigger coalition collapse before the vote.
 
-### Fissure C — L defection (L sometimes votes with opposition on SME matters)
+#### Fissure C — L defection (L sometimes votes with opposition on SME matters)
 
 | Parti | Ja | Nej | Avstår |
 |---|---:|---:|---:|
@@ -1047,7 +1033,7 @@ Full KD defection flips the vote but is politically implausible — would trigge
 
 L has more history of selective defection than KD; still politically unlikely on a government-wedge issue.
 
-## Post-2026 projection (if polling holds)
+### Post-2026 projection (if polling holds)
 
 Applying 2026Q1 polling (S 33%, M 17%, SD 21%, V 7%, C 5%, MP 5%, KD 4%, L 3%) to 349 seats:
 
@@ -1065,7 +1051,7 @@ Applying 2026Q1 polling (S 33%, M 17%, SD 21%, V 7%, C 5%, MP 5%, KD 4%, L 3%) t
 
 **Post-2026 Tidö** (if L falls below threshold): 148 (M+SD+KD), short of 175 majority. **Red-green bloc**: 176 (S+V+C+MP), majority. HD10447's KD-damage vector matters more for the coalition post-2026 than pre-2026.
 
-## Visual
+### Visual
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -1084,19 +1070,18 @@ graph TB
   style O2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **HIGH** on current seats (A1 — Valmyndigheten). **MEDIUM** on 2026 projection (B2 — polling aggregates, seat allocation via Sainte-Laguë).
 
 ---
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 **Question**: Which voter segments does HD10447 move, and how much?
 
-## Primary segments
+### Primary segments
 
 | Segment | Size (eligible) | 2022 vote split | Relevance to HD10447 | Est. movement |
 |---|---:|---|---|---|
@@ -1109,7 +1094,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | Soft M voters (centrist) | ~0.6M | M 2022 | MEDIUM — sensitive to "competence" frame | M → S, C, MP micro-shifts |
 | Soft KD voters | ~0.3M | KD 2022 | HIGH — central to KD brand risk | KD → L, M, abstain |
 
-## Narrative receptivity
+### Narrative receptivity
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -1129,35 +1114,34 @@ quadrantChart
   "Public-sector workers": [0.10, 0.88]
 ```
 
-## Movement model (weighted)
+### Movement model (weighted)
 
 Expected net S gain from HD10447 = Σ(segment size × movement prob) / electorate ≈ **+0.1–0.3 pp nationally**. Expected KD loss ≈ **−0.1–0.4 pp**. See `election-2026-analysis.md` for stacking effect across the full S IP campaign.
 
-## High-information segments for tracking
+### High-information segments for tracking
 
 1. **Soft KD voters** — KD brand-damage canary; watch Företagarna panels.
 2. **SME owners** — direct narrative target; watch Svenskt Näringsliv surveys.
 3. **Rural Gävleborg** — constituency amplification; watch local press coverage.
 
-## Source rating
+### Source rating
 
 Segment sizes from SCB 2025 labour-market tables (A1). 2022 vote splits from Valmyndigheten (A1). Movement projections from cluster base-rate modelling (B2).
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM** — segment sizes A1; projected shifts B2 (extrapolated from prior wedge-campaign analogs).
 
 ---
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Subject**: How comparable jurisdictions treat SME high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement. **Method**: Outside-In comparator analysis per [`ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md).
 
 **Comparator set**: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany, EU baseline (Nordic + EU minimum).
 
-## Comparator table
+### Comparator table
 
 | Jurisdiction | Equivalent scheme | Current status | Employer cost share | Primary source |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1168,13 +1152,13 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | **Germany** | Entgeltfortzahlung + Umlageverfahren U1 (EFZG) | Mandatory pooling scheme for small firms (< 30 employees); state covers up to 80% | Employer 6 weeks, but U1 pools the SME burden | <https://www.bmas.de/> (A1) |
 | **EU average** | Varies | ~7/27 member states operate explicit SME reimbursement; another ~8 have shorter employer windows | Mixed | EU-OSHA 2024 report (A1) |
 
-## Key findings
+### Key findings
 
 1. **Sweden post-2024 is the Nordic outlier.** All three Nordic comparators maintain an explicit mechanism to shorten or pool SME sick-pay exposure. Denmark, Finland, Norway all cap employer burden in weeks, not month. After 2024, Sweden effectively extends employer-borne cost beyond the Nordic norm.
 2. **Germany's U1 Umlageverfahren** offers a design precedent often cited by Företagarna: mandatory small-firm pooling, 60–80% reimbursement, funded by employer levy. Relevant to HD10447 because it is a "reinstate with a twist" option.
 3. **EU policy trajectory** (European Semester 2025) flags employer sick-pay burden as an SME-productivity factor for several member states — Sweden not yet on that list, but the HD10447 narrative could raise its profile.
 
-## Lessons applicable to HD10447
+### Lessons applicable to HD10447
 
 | Lesson | Implication |
 |---|---|
@@ -1182,7 +1166,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | German U1 pooling is a revenue-neutral design | KD/M could propose pooling rather than reinstatement |
 | Short employer windows (Norway 16 days) are politically stable across left/right governments | Political risk of abolition is asymmetric — hard to re-establish once removed |
 
-## Visual
+### Visual
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TB
@@ -1204,19 +1188,18 @@ graph TB
   style EU fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **HIGH (A1–A2)** — comparator statutes and scheme designs are matter of open public law.
 
 ---
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 **Question**: What past episodes most closely resemble HD10447 + cluster, and what did they predict?
 
-## Parallel 1 — 2021-22 S wedge campaign on pensioners' tax (pre-2022 election)
+### Parallel 1 — 2021-22 S wedge campaign on pensioners' tax (pre-2022 election)
 
 S coordinated 9 interpellations on pensioners' skatt Jan–May 2022, addressing Finance Minister Damberg and PM Andersson. Pattern: single-signatory, topic-clustered, pre-election. Led to a budget concession on the sänkta skatten för pensionärer.
 
@@ -1224,7 +1207,7 @@ S coordinated 9 interpellations on pensioners' skatt Jan–May 2022, addressing
 - **Outcome**: Coalition held; opposition captured narrative; concession made 2 months before election.
 - **Predictive value**: High for narrative-capture, medium for concession (Tidö has less vote slack than the 2021 minority government).
 
-## Parallel 2 — 2018-19 M campaign on energipolitik
+### Parallel 2 — 2018-19 M campaign on energipolitik
 
 M filed 11 IPs Feb–Jun 2018 on energipolitik ahead of 2018 val, addressing then-minister Baylan (S). Produced narrative traction but no policy change; contributed to 2018 close result.
 
@@ -1232,7 +1215,7 @@ M filed 11 IPs Feb–Jun 2018 on energipolitik ahead of 2018 val, addressing the
 - **Outcome**: Narrative win, no policy move.
 - **Predictive value**: Medium — Tidö likely follows Löfven-government pattern of holding line.
 
-## Parallel 3 — 2024 abolition itself (the policy being contested)
+### Parallel 3 — 2024 abolition itself (the policy being contested)
 
 The ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader was abolished in the 2024 budget proposition. Tidö argued the scheme was administratively costly relative to its reach. Opposition IPs on the abolition were filed in 2024 Q4 but narrative did not cohere then.
 
@@ -1240,21 +1223,21 @@ The ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader was abolished in the 2024 budget p
 - **Outcome then**: Minimal political cost to Tidö.
 - **Predictive implication**: Re-activation with election context materially changes the risk profile.
 
-## Parallel 4 — 2014 FP (now L) small-business motion cluster
+### Parallel 4 — 2014 FP (now L) small-business motion cluster
 
 Pre-2014 election, FP filed a cluster of motions/IPs on small-business cost pressures. Policy effect near-zero; narrative effect moderate; FP lost ground anyway.
 
 - **Relevance**: Opposite ideological direction but similar tactic.
 - **Predictive value**: Narrative alone is not sufficient — must be tied to a broader economic frame.
 
-## Parallel 5 — German Entgeltfortzahlung debate (1996)
+### Parallel 5 — German Entgeltfortzahlung debate (1996)
 
 Germany's Kohl government cut sick-pay continuation from 100% to 80% in 1996 — faced mass opposition, partly reversed 1999 after Rot-Grün won. Shows the long shadow of sick-pay policy cuts on a ruling coalition.
 
 - **Relevance**: Different jurisdiction; same political physics (sick-pay cuts as durable wedge).
 - **Predictive value**: Medium-long-term — cuts of this type tend to return as election issues for many cycles.
 
-## Synthesis
+### Synthesis
 
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
@@ -1271,31 +1254,30 @@ graph LR
   style P5 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Net historical signal
+### Net historical signal
 
 - Narrative capture is achievable and consistent across all 5 parallels (high prior).
 - Concession is conditional on coalition vote-slack — Tidö has **less** slack than the 2022 Andersson government had → **lower** concession probability.
 - Wedge-issue durability across cycles (Parallel 5) argues against treating HD10447 as a one-off.
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM-HIGH** — parallels 1–3 are directly analogous with well-documented A2 sourcing; parallel 5 is international and loosely analogous.
 
 ---
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 **Subject**: How feasible is partial or full reinstatement of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader, if a future government chose to do so?
 
-## Administrative readiness
+### Administrative readiness
 
 - **Legacy system**: Försäkringskassan administered the scheme 2016–2024. Infrastructure de-commissioned but **not fully dismantled**; code paths and reporting schemas are archived. Reactivation estimate: 6–9 months from political decision to operational payout.
 - **Data flows**: Arbetsgivardeklaration på individnivå (AGI) already reports sick-pay data monthly; the scheme's threshold check is a database query, not a new data collection.
 - **Complexity**: LOW — scheme was revenue-checked not behaviour-checked.
 
-## Fiscal readiness
+### Fiscal readiness
 
 | Design | Annual cost estimate (2024 SEK) | Commentary |
 |---|---:|---|
@@ -1305,13 +1287,13 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 Tidö fiscal space in 2025 is tight (overskottsmål under pressure); partial or pooling designs more credible than full reinstatement.
 
-## Legal readiness
+### Legal readiness
 
 - **Statutory vehicle**: Socialförsäkringsbalken 24 kap. — minor amendment required to reinstate § on reimbursement. Well-understood drafting.
 - **EU state-aid**: the original scheme was de-minimis-compatible; reinstatement similarly unproblematic under EU 2023/2831.
 - **Coordination with arbetsgivaravgifter**: requires parallel change to SFB 24 kap. to avoid double-compensation.
 
-## Political feasibility path
+### Political feasibility path
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1329,7 +1311,7 @@ flowchart LR
   style END2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Feasibility summary table
+### Feasibility summary table
 
 | Dimension | Score (1-5) | Commentary |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -1340,26 +1322,25 @@ flowchart LR
 | Political (red-green) | 4 | Likely to include in 2026 manifesto |
 | **Overall (post-2026 red-green)** | **3.5** | Feasible with partial or pooling design |
 
-## Risk of botched implementation
+### Risk of botched implementation
 
 - If reinstated hurriedly post-2026 election without clarified thresholds, could cause administrative flux and temporary under-payment of legitimate claims.
 - Mitigation: 6-month transition window with legacy parameters.
 
-## Confidence
+### Confidence
 
 **MEDIUM-HIGH** — administrative and legal feasibility A1–A2; political feasibility B2 (based on polling and manifesto signalling).
 
 ---
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: Challenge the lead framing via ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses). **Reference**: [`ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md) §Red-team.
 
-## Competing hypotheses
+### Competing hypotheses
 
-### Hypothesis H1 — Coordinated pre-election campaign
+#### Hypothesis H1 — Coordinated pre-election campaign
 
 HD10447 is part of a deliberate, centrally-coordinated S campaign to build an SME-cost wedge ahead of the September 2026 election.
 
@@ -1367,7 +1348,7 @@ HD10447 is part of a deliberate, centrally-coordinated S campaign to build an SM
 
 **Contradicting**: No public press tie-in yet; single signatory (not co-signed across S front-bench); no parallel S press release.
 
-### Hypothesis H2 — Constituency-driven individual filing
+#### Hypothesis H2 — Constituency-driven individual filing
 
 HD10447 is a constituency-driven individual filing by Lundqvist responding to SME owners in Gävleborg, not a party campaign. The cluster pattern is coincidence plus opposition baseline.
 
@@ -1375,7 +1356,7 @@ HD10447 is a constituency-driven individual filing by Lundqvist responding to SM
 
 **Contradicting**: Topic density in the cluster (4 labour-policy IPs in 3 weeks) is 4× baseline; similar patterns preceded 2022 and 2018 S campaigns.
 
-### Hypothesis H3 — Signalling to internal Tidö fracture
+#### Hypothesis H3 — Signalling to internal Tidö fracture
 
 HD10447 is primarily aimed not at Tidö as a whole but at exploiting a latent M-KD tension on SME burden. The KD-specific addressee is the signal.
 
@@ -1383,7 +1364,7 @@ HD10447 is primarily aimed not at Tidö as a whole but at exploiting a latent M-
 
 **Contradicting**: Energy/Industry ministry is the conventional addressee for SME matters regardless of party — the addressee choice is structural, not tactical.
 
-## ACH matrix
+### ACH matrix
 
 | Evidence | H1 (campaign) | H2 (constituency) | H3 (KD-fracture) |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -1399,13 +1380,13 @@ HD10447 is primarily aimed not at Tidö as a whole but at exploiting a latent M-
 
 Legend: `++` strong supporting · `+` weak supporting · `0` neutral · `−` contradicting.
 
-## Ranking
+### Ranking
 
 1. **H1 Coordinated campaign** — strongest fit (net +7). Adopted as working hypothesis.
 2. **H3 KD-fracture signalling** — secondary, consistent with H1 (not mutually exclusive).
 3. **H2 Constituency-driven** — weakest fit; useful as null hypothesis.
 
-## Red-team challenge
+### Red-team challenge
 
 - **Challenge A**: If this were a coordinated campaign we would expect co-signers. Why none?
   - Response: S front-bench may be sequencing sole-authored IPs to cover more topics faster (one filer per topic). Test: watch for 2026-04-25 through 2026-05-06 additional S IPs on new axes.
@@ -1414,24 +1395,23 @@ Legend: `++` strong supporting · `+` weak supporting · `0` neutral · `−` co
 - **Challenge C**: Election-wedge framing presumes SME-cost is an elector-salient axis. Is it?
   - Response: SCB 2025 undersökning attitudes to företagande shows 32% of SME owners cite "kostnader för sjukdom" as a top-3 concern. Modest but non-trivial salience. Source: <https://www.scb.se/> (A2).
 
-## Rejected / logged alternatives
+### Rejected / logged alternatives
 
 - **Policy-wonk filing** (Lundqvist raising a wonkish issue irrespective of campaign) — rejected: text framing is overtly political (Sweden-EU growth gap, "den här regeringen").
 - **Intra-S factional signalling** (left-S pushing economic-populist agenda over centrist) — logged but not supported by current evidence.
 
-## Confidence on outcome
+### Confidence on outcome
 
 **MEDIUM-HIGH** that H1 is the dominant hypothesis. Reassess after 2026-05-06 if no press coordination emerges (then shift weight toward H2/H3).
 
 ---
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md -->
 
 **Method**: 7-dimension political-classification per [`political-classification-guide.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md).
 
-## HD10447 — Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader
+### HD10447 — Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader
 
 | Dimension | Value | Evidence |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -1443,14 +1423,14 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | 6. Public interest | High — affects ~1.2M SMEs, ~60% of private-sector employment | SCB företagsstatistik 2024 (A2) <https://www.scb.se/> |
 | 7. Election relevance | High — wedge-ready, 5 months before Sep 2026 | Direct cite of Sweden-vs-EU growth comparison is an electoral-narrative frame (A2) |
 
-## Priority tier
+### Priority tier
 
 **L2+ Priority** — one tier above default L2 Strategic because:
 - Reopens a closed 2024 budget decision with quantifiable fiscal footprint (~SEK 1.0–1.5 bn/year).
 - Cabinet-level minister personally exposed.
 - Pre-election wedge posture.
 
-## Retention & access
+### Retention & access
 
 | Attribute | Value |
 |---|---|
@@ -1459,7 +1439,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Retention | Keep indefinitely in `analysis/daily/`; primary source URL is permanent |
 | Access | Analysts + public via news pipeline |
 
-## Cluster classifications (HD10428–HD10447 window)
+### Cluster classifications (HD10428–HD10447 window)
 
 | Cluster | Items | Domain | Intensity | Election relevance |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1469,7 +1449,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Healthcare | HD10432, HD10434, HD10442 | Health, regional | Medium | High |
 | Foreign / diaspora | HD10435, HD10431 | Foreign, rights | Low | Low |
 
-## Visual
+### Visual
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
@@ -1485,7 +1465,7 @@ graph TD
   style D4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 - <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html> (A2, primary)
 - SCB företagsstatistik: <https://www.scb.se/> (A2)
@@ -1494,21 +1474,20 @@ graph TD
 ---
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: Map HD10447 to adjacent policy clusters, legislative chains, and coordinated-activity patterns.
 
-## Policy clusters
+### Policy clusters
 
-### SME-cost economics cluster
+#### SME-cost economics cluster
 
 | dok_id | Title | Filer | Date | Link |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
 | HD10447 | Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader | S Lundqvist | 2026-04-23 | <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html> |
 | HD10444 | Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter | S | 2026-04-22 | <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html> |
 
-### Labour / social-protection cluster
+#### Labour / social-protection cluster
 
 | dok_id | Title | Filer | Date |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -1518,7 +1497,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 | HD10438 | Nedläggning av kvinnojourer | S | 2026-04-17 |
 | HD10437 | Lönetransparensdirektivet | S | 2026-04-17 |
 
-### Security / policing cluster
+#### Security / policing cluster
 
 | dok_id | Title | Filer | Date |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -1527,7 +1506,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 | HD10430 | Moskéer som sprider hat och hot | SD | 2026-04-07 |
 | HD10429 | Skyddet för yttrandefriheten prop 2025/26:133 | SD | 2026-04-07 |
 
-### Healthcare / regional cluster
+#### Healthcare / regional cluster
 
 | dok_id | Title | Filer | Date |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -1535,7 +1514,7 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 | HD10432 | Statligt säkerställande vårdbyggnader | S | 2026-04-15 |
 | HD10434 | Bostadsbyggandet Stockholmsregionen | S | 2026-04-15 |
 
-## Legislative chain (HD10447)
+### Legislative chain (HD10447)
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1551,7 +1530,7 @@ flowchart LR
   style EL fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## Coordinated-activity pattern
+### Coordinated-activity pattern
 
 | Indicator | Observation | Source |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -1561,12 +1540,12 @@ flowchart LR
 | Baseline (2025/26 session) | S files ~3 IPs/week on average | <https://data.riksdagen.se/> |
 | Campaign index | 4× baseline in cluster weeks | Ratio calc |
 
-## Sibling-folder citations
+### Sibling-folder citations
 
 - Propositions folder `2026-04-24/propositions/` — cross-check for any SME-cost government proposition.
 - Budget artefacts — historical reimbursement programme references in `analysis/worldbank/` and `analysis/imf/` economic context.
 
-## External-source references (Admiralty annotated)
+### External-source references (Admiralty annotated)
 
 | Source | Grade | Use |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -1581,12 +1560,11 @@ flowchart LR
 ---
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Purpose**: Audit the analytical process itself against ICD 203 and OSINT tradecraft canon; log what worked, what didn't, and concrete improvements.
 
-## ICD 203 audit
+### ICD 203 audit
 
 | ICD 203 standard | How addressed | Gap |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -1600,11 +1578,11 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | 8. Logical argumentation | ACH matrix with explicit net-support scoring; transparent scenario probabilities | — |
 | 9. Consistency | Cross-reference map aligns synthesis, threat, SWOT, risk, scenario, intel-assessment | — |
 
-## Admiralty Code usage
+### Admiralty Code usage
 
 Evidence rated A1–F6 throughout. Primary sources (Riksdagen, Regeringen, Kela, NAV) rated A1–A2. Base-rate extrapolations rated B2–B3. No source below C3 used in Key Judgments.
 
-## Structured Analytic Techniques applied
+### Structured Analytic Techniques applied
 
 1. Key Assumptions Check (scenario-analysis.md)
 2. ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (devils-advocate.md)
@@ -1617,25 +1595,25 @@ Evidence rated A1–F6 throughout. Primary sources (Riksdagen, Regeringen, Kela,
 9. What-If / leading-indicator bait (forward-indicators.md)
 10. Red-team challenge (devils-advocate.md challenges A–C)
 
-## WEP / Kent Scale usage
+### WEP / Kent Scale usage
 
 Probabilities expressed both as percentages (50 / 20 / 20 / 10) and anchored to WEP bands:
 - 50% → *Even chance* / *Sannolikt*
 - 20% → *Unlikely* / *Osannolikt*
 - 10% → *Very unlikely* / *Mycket osannolikt*
 
-## What worked
+### What worked
 
 - Batched heredoc writing kept the 30-min PR deadline feasible.
 - Using the 29-IP cluster as cluster-context allowed strong H1 framing without over-claiming on a single doc.
 - Pre-flight check correctly routed to Analysis mode.
 
-## What didn't
+### What didn't
 
 - Initial threat-analysis.md heredoc triggered sandbox block on word "kill-chain"; had to rewrite (cost ~60 s).
 - Only one date-filtered document for 2026-04-24 required lookback to 2026-04-23 and wider cluster context — acceptable but reduces narrative variety.
 
-## Methodology Improvements (for next run)
+### Methodology Improvements (for next run)
 
 1. **Avoid sandbox hot-words**: add a pre-check for banned strings (`kill-chain`, etc.) before heredoc write.
 2. **Parallelise Family D**: batch 7 Family D files into one multi-heredoc bash call once cluster data is confirmed stable.
@@ -1643,7 +1621,7 @@ Probabilities expressed both as percentages (50 / 20 / 20 / 10) and anchored to
 4. **Earlier Pass 1 snapshot**: snapshot at the 8-file mark rather than 22-file mark to reduce end-of-run risk if deadline approaches.
 5. **Press-source watch list**: add a standing A3-quality comparator to `forward-indicators.md` so the 2026-05-07 answer auto-triggers a follow-up workflow.
 
-## OSINT ethics check
+### OSINT ethics check
 
 - Only public sources (Riksdagen open data, Regeringen.se, public comparator government data).
 - No personal data beyond what MPs and ministers publish in their official capacity (GDPR Art. 9 lawful basis 9(2)(e)).
@@ -1653,8 +1631,7 @@ Probabilities expressed both as percentages (50 / 20 / 20 / 10) and anchored to
 ---
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-24 01:36 UTC
 **Data Sources**: get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
@@ -1669,7 +1646,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 > `analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` and using templates
 > from `analysis/templates/`.
 
-## Document Counts by Type
+### Document Counts by Type
 
 - **propositions**: 0 documents
 - **motions**: 0 documents
@@ -1679,8 +1656,36 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **questions**: 0 documents
 - **interpellations**: 30 documents
 
-## Data Quality Notes
+### Data Quality Notes
 
 All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-23 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.
 ---
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10447-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/article.md
index ded255e3a5..abd14ea4c9 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-24
 subfolder: motions
 slug: 2026-04-24-motions
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.946Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.741Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,20 +26,19 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed **20 counter-motions** against **9 Tidö-government propositions** — a coordinated legislative response concentrated in three utskott (FiU/SfU/SoU) and anchored on the drivmedelsbudget (prop 2025/26:236, [HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html)). **Sverigedemokraterna filed zero counter-motions**, preserving complete Tidö-bloc discipline. The wave telegraphs 2026-election positioning: S owns the fiscal-climate axis; V owns the distributional axis; MP owns the vapenexport axis; C owns the procedural-reform axis; SD stays silent.
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Editorial priority ranking** — Lead coverage on drivmedel cluster (3 motions, election-salient), secondary on utvisning cluster (rule-of-law) and vapenexport (foreign-policy cleavage).
 2. **Coalition-signal tracking** — Log that S has *not* joined MP on the vapenexport motion (HD024096 vs absent S counterpart). This is a load-bearing red-green scenario constraint for 2026 government formation.
 3. **Forecast update** — Raise probability of Tidö bills passing substantially unchanged from baseline 65% → 72%. SD's zero-motion posture removes the only plausible right-flank defection path on migration/justice.
 
-## 60-second bullets
+### 60-second bullets
 
 - **Scale**: 20 motions / 72 hours / 9 propositions / 6 utskott. **Admiralty B2**.
 - **Battleground**: Drivmedelsbudget (prop 236) is the single hottest file — S ([HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html)), V ([HD024092](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html)) and MP ([HD024098](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html)) all filed.
@@ -49,11 +48,11 @@ Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) fil
 - **Centre track**: C filed on 5 bills (prop 215, 216, 222, 223, 229, 235) but consistently motions for procedural tightening rather than rejection — positioning for bourgeois-curious voters.
 - **Regering risk**: FiU vote on drivmedelspaket is the most likely outcome to generate floor-visible dissent; the coalition retains the arithmetic but opposition will use the debate for election-cycle framing.
 
-## Top forward trigger
+### Top forward trigger
 
 📍 **Watch**: FiU's betänkande timeline on prop 2025/26:236 — if reported out before 2026-06-01, drivmedel becomes the defining pre-summer political narrative. If delayed into autumn, S's framing hardens and coalition cohesion faces stress on fuel-tax permanence.
 
-## Mermaid — decision landscape
+### Mermaid — decision landscape
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -90,16 +89,15 @@ flowchart TB
 ---
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 ---
 
-## Lead decision
+### Lead decision
 
 > **BLUF**: The four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) have filed a **coordinated counter-motion wave** of 20 motions against 9 Tidö-government propositions in a 72-hour window (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17). The dominant battleground is the Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (prop 236) drivmedelsskatt, attracting motions from all three left-bloc parties (S/V/MP). The wave is concentrated in three utskott — **FiU** (economy), **SfU** (migration), **SoU** (health) — mirroring the salience hierarchy heading into the 2026 election. Sverigedemokraterna's complete absence from the counter-motion set is the single most structurally revealing signal: SD remains fully Tidö-aligned, foreclosing any opposition-from-right scenario on these bills.
 
-## DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)
+### DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)
 
 | Rank | dok_id | DIW tier | Why it matters |
 |-----:|--------|---------|----------------|
@@ -116,7 +114,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Sensitivity**: Ranking robust under ±1 tier perturbation — drivmedel cluster remains top by weight-of-evidence regardless of scoring adjustment. Rank sensitivity is formalised in `significance-scoring.md`.
 
-## Integrated intelligence picture
+### Integrated intelligence picture
 
 The counter-motion flow decomposes into four behaviour signatures:
 
@@ -125,7 +123,7 @@ The counter-motion flow decomposes into four behaviour signatures:
 3. **Centre-track reform-not-reject** by C across five bills (215, 216, 222, 223, 229, 235) — C consistently motions for procedural tightening rather than outright avslag. Signals C's positioning as the "responsible alternative" for bourgeois-curious voters. **Admiralty: B2**.
 4. **SD silence** — zero counter-motions from SD despite SD being the largest party by 2022 vote share and formal non-member of Tidö government. Full coalition discipline intact. **Admiralty: A1**.
 
-## Policy-area heat map
+### Policy-area heat map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -151,7 +149,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style P fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Key judgments preview
+### Key judgments preview
 
 - **KJ-1 [HIGH]**: The S-led drivmedel counter-motion (HD024082) positions S as the fiscal anchor of a potential red-green coalition in 2026 — S frames the regeringsproposition not as a tax cut but as a climate-policy regression.
 - **KJ-2 [HIGH]**: The MP vapenexport motion (HD024096) creates a narrow but durable left-bloc cleavage — S has not filed a parallel motion, preserving S's Nato-era defence-industry consensus with M/KD.
@@ -159,7 +157,7 @@ flowchart LR
 
 Full judgments, uncertainty and drivers → `intelligence-assessment.md`. Forward triggers → `forward-indicators.md`.
 
-## AI-Recommended Article Metadata
+### AI-Recommended Article Metadata
 
 - **Headline (EN)**: "Opposition Files 20-Motion Counter-Wave Against Tidö Budget, Justice Package"
 - **Headline (SV)**: "Oppositionen svarar med 20 motioner mot Tidö-budget och rättspaket"
@@ -171,51 +169,50 @@ Full judgments, uncertainty and drivers → `intelligence-assessment.md`. Forwar
 *Sources: riksdag-regering MCP `get_motioner` (2026-04-24T01:05:50Z); all dok_id verifiable at data.riksdagen.se.*
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md)_
-
-## Bottom Line Up Front
+### Bottom Line Up Front
 
 Opposition filed **20 motions across 9 Tidö bills in 3 days (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17)**, with **zero SD counter-motions**. The pattern reveals disciplined Tidö support on the government side and fragmented-but-parallel opposition on the other. Tidö retains procedural majority (176/349 seats); passage of most bills intact is the most likely outcome (~55%), but election-cycle amplification makes the motion content a narrative-shaping instrument for 2026.
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### KJ-1 — Tidö discipline remains intact
+#### KJ-1 — Tidö discipline remains intact
 *We judge with **high confidence** (Admiralty B2) that Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L = 176/349) will deliver all 9 Tidö bills to floor vote in 2026-05/06 with coalition parties voting Ja.*
 
 **Basis**: Zero SD counter-motions in this wave; Tidö has passed every prior legislative package 2022–2026. 
 **Analytic confidence**: High (consistent evidence, long baseline).  
 **PIR reference**: PIR-2 (coalition discipline).
 
-### KJ-2 — Opposition coordination is parallel, not unified
+#### KJ-2 — Opposition coordination is parallel, not unified
 *We judge with **moderate confidence** (B3) that opposition (S/V/MP/C) remains structurally fragmented; the 2.2 motions/bill density reflects parallel filings, not coordinated opposition.*
 
 **Basis**: No co-signed motions; divergent framing (S fiscal-anchor, V distributional, MP ethical, C reform). Four-party convergence only on prop 216 healthcare.  
 **Analytic confidence**: Moderate (evidence consistent with null hypothesis also — see [devils-advocate.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md)).  
 **PIR reference**: PIR-4 (opposition bloc dynamics).
 
-### KJ-3 — Drivmedel cluster has highest 2026 electoral salience
+#### KJ-3 — Drivmedel cluster has highest 2026 electoral salience
 *We judge with **moderate confidence** (B3) that the prop 236 / drivmedel cluster ([HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html), [HD024092](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html), [HD024098](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html)) will dominate post-summer 2026 election discourse.*
 
 **Basis**: Three-party opposition convergence; SCB fuel-price indicators trending; rural/urban distributional cleavage aligned with existing S/V/MP base-building.  
 **Analytic confidence**: Moderate (economic-voting literature supports; salience depends on further ECB / oil-price trajectory).  
 **PIR reference**: PIR-1 (election 2026 salience).
 
-### KJ-4 — Prop 216 is the bill with highest amendment probability
+#### KJ-4 — Prop 216 is the bill with highest amendment probability
 *We judge with **low-moderate confidence** (C3) that prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens — healthcare workforce) faces the highest probability of substantial amendment due to the four-party wave ([HD024078](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html), [HD024083](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html), [HD024087](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html), [HD024094](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html)) incl. C offering reform path.*
 
 **Basis**: Only bill in the wave with opposition across all four opposition parties; SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner) has standing interest in kommun-sector workforce policy and may weigh in.  
 **Analytic confidence**: Low-Moderate (depends on SKR stance).  
 **PIR reference**: PIR-3 (healthcare policy implementation risk).
 
-### KJ-5 — MP vapenexport framework opens new opposition axis
+#### KJ-5 — MP vapenexport framework opens new opposition axis
 *We judge with **low confidence** (C4) that MP motion [HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html) (ethical vapenexport framework) represents a durable new opposition axis that could fragment opposition further in 2026.*
 
 **Basis**: First substantive MP policy on defence-industry ethics in current mandatperiod; differentiates MP from S (silent) and V (softer framing); creates wedge with defence industry + Nato-alignment camp.  
 **Analytic confidence**: Low (single data point; dependent on media uptake).  
 **PIR reference**: PIR-5 (foreign policy positioning).
 
-## Confidence-level calibration
+### Confidence-level calibration
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -233,7 +230,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style KJ5 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Priority Intelligence Requirements (standing PIRs)
+### Priority Intelligence Requirements (standing PIRs)
 
 - **PIR-1** — Does the drivmedel issue gain >5% public salience by summer 2026? (SCB / Novus surveys.)
 - **PIR-2** — Does SD publicly dissent on any Tidö bill before floor vote? (Press monitoring.)
@@ -243,13 +240,13 @@ flowchart LR
 - **PIR-6** — Does any Tidö party abstain on ändringsbudget vote for prop 236? (Kammarvote record.)
 - **PIR-7** — Does V or MP receive +1% in next Novus following utvisning debate? (Polling.)
 
-## Analytic caveats
+### Analytic caveats
 
 - Motion-filing ≠ floor-vote outcome; all judgments are probabilistic.
 - Baseline motion-density series (2018–2025) would strengthen KJ-2; flagged for acquisition ([methodology-reflection.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md)).
 - No classified sources used; all dok_ids verifiable on [data.riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/).
 
-## Dissemination
+### Dissemination
 
 - Primary audience: political analysts, journalists, policy researchers.
 - Handoff: Next daily brief incorporates updates from utskott hearings.
@@ -262,12 +259,11 @@ flowchart LR
 ---
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 DIW (Dimension · Intensity · Weight) composite scoring per [`ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md). Composite = Political (30%) + Fiscal (20%) + Legal (15%) + Distributional (15%) + International (10%) + Electoral (10%).
 
-## Ranking table (all 20 motions)
+### Ranking table (all 20 motions)
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Party | Cluster | Pol | Fiscal | Legal | Dist | Intl | Elect | DIW | Tier | Evidence |
 |-----:|--------|-------|---------|----:|-------:|------:|-----:|-----:|------:|----:|------|----------|
@@ -292,13 +288,13 @@ DIW (Dimension · Intensity · Weight) composite scoring per [`ai-driven-analysi
 | 19 | HD024084 | V | ersättningsregler | 4 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 | **3.95** | L1 | [HD024084](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html) |
 | 20 | HD024088 | C | konsumentkredit | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | **3.80** | L1 | [HD024088](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html) |
 
-## Sensitivity analysis
+### Sensitivity analysis
 
 - **Weight perturbation (±5% on each axis)**: Top-5 ranking stable. HD024096 (krigsmateriel) rank sensitivity: drops to 6 if International weight reduced to 5%, rises to 3 if weighted 15%.
 - **Tier cut-off (DIW ≥ 7.0 = L2+)**: Three documents qualify — all three drivmedel motions. Robust finding.
 - **Party-balance audit**: Scores do not systematically favour any bloc — top-3 are S (1), MP (1), V (1). Audit trail in `methodology-reflection.md §Party neutrality arithmetic`.
 
-## Mermaid — DIW tier distribution
+### Mermaid — DIW tier distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -321,7 +317,7 @@ quadrantChart
     style HD024082 fill:#ff006e
 ```
 
-## Methodology notes
+### Methodology notes
 
 - **Scale**: Each axis 1–10. Weights documented in [`ai-driven-analysis-guide.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md).
 - **Composite formula**: `DIW = 0.30·Pol + 0.20·Fiscal + 0.15·Legal + 0.15·Dist + 0.10·Intl + 0.10·Elect`.
@@ -333,12 +329,11 @@ quadrantChart
 *Evidence: every row cites a verifiable `dok_id` resolvable via `get_dokument`. Source: riksdag-regering MCP.*
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 Analyses anticipated media framing across Swedish outlets for the 9-bill + 20-motion cluster.
 
-## Expected framing by outlet
+### Expected framing by outlet
 
 | Outlet | Orientation | Likely frame | Evidence-framed motion |
 |--------|-------------|--------------|-------------------------|
@@ -352,7 +347,7 @@ Analyses anticipated media framing across Swedish outlets for the 9-bill + 20-mo
 | Fokus | Nyhetsmagasin | Analys av Tidö-dynamiken | Cross-cluster |
 | DI — Dagens Industri | Näringsliv-orienterat | "Vapenexportsystemet under tryck — MP motion" | [HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html) |
 
-## Frame cluster map
+### Frame cluster map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -373,29 +368,29 @@ flowchart TB
     style Wedge fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Framing vectors by motion cluster
+### Framing vectors by motion cluster
 
-### Drivmedel (prop 236)
+#### Drivmedel (prop 236)
 - **Mobiliserande frame** (S/V/MP): "Tidö väljer biltrafik över klimat" / "Skattesänkning på bekostnad av rurala vårdbehov"
 - **Motrörelse frame** (Tidö): "Sänkta drivmedelspriser hjälper vanliga familjer"
 - **Neutral frame** (SR): "Budget-effekten av drivmedelsänkningen — 2.5 mdkr"
 
-### Utvisning (prop 235)
+#### Utvisning (prop 235)
 - **Mobiliserande frame** (V/MP): "Rättssäkerheten urholkas" / "Europas hårdaste utvisningslag"
 - **Motrörelse frame** (Tidö/SD): "Tidö levererar svensk asylreform"
 - **Neutral frame**: "Vad ändras konkret? Juridisk analys"
 
-### Krigsmateriel (prop 228)
+#### Krigsmateriel (prop 228)
 - **MP-frame**: "Etisk kontroll av svenska vapen" ([HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html))
 - **Motrörelse**: "Försvarsindustrin viktig för svensk säkerhet"
 - **Neutral**: "Nuvarande kontrollsystem — hur fungerar det?"
 
-### Medicinsk kompetens (prop 216)
+#### Medicinsk kompetens (prop 216)
 - **4-partsfronten**: "Sällsynt enighet mot regeringens reform"
 - **Motrörelse**: "Snabb behandling av vårdpersonalbristen"
 - **Kommunsektor-frame**: "SKR bekymrad över finansiering"
 
-## Social-media framing predictions
+### Social-media framing predictions
 
 | Platform | Expected framing dynamic | Amplification risk |
 |----------|--------------------------|--------------------|
@@ -406,14 +401,14 @@ flowchart TB
 | LinkedIn | Näringsliv perspective on vapenexport, cybersäk | Low |
 | Telegram | Konspirationsnarrativ risk on migration bills | Medium-High |
 
-## Frame-war indicators
+### Frame-war indicators
 
 1. **Who defines "obstruction"**: Tidö frames 20 motions as opposition obstruction; opposition frames as democratic oversight.
 2. **Who owns "drivmedel"**: S fiscal-anchor frame vs Tidö "familjeekonomi" frame — contested.
 3. **Who owns "rättssäkerhet"**: V/MP civil-rights frame vs Tidö "rättssäker utvisning" frame — contested.
 4. **SD frame absent**: SD does not frame this wave; absence itself is a frame Tidö exploits as "disciplinerat stöd".
 
-## Editorial recommendations (for riksdagsmonitor journalism)
+### Editorial recommendations (for riksdagsmonitor journalism)
 
 1. Identify each motion by dok_id in every article — avoid generic "opposition motion".
 2. Explain extra ändringsbudget procedure on prop 236 in plain language.
@@ -421,7 +416,7 @@ flowchart TB
 4. Do not over-claim "opposition coordination" — evidence supports parallel filing more than unified strategy.
 5. Give MP vapenexport framework its own dedicated explanation — underreported axis.
 
-## Counterspin and balance checklist
+### Counterspin and balance checklist
 
 - ✓ Name every primary author by party
 - ✓ Link every dok_id to [data.riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/)
@@ -435,12 +430,11 @@ flowchart TB
 *Media framing predictions based on historical outlet patterns 2014–2025. No individual journalist targeting — outlet-level orientation only.*
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 Six-lens stakeholder analysis. Lenses: **Government coalition**, **Opposition bloc**, **Business/industry**, **Civil society**, **Voters/regional**, **Foreign/EU**.
 
-## Stakeholder matrix
+### Stakeholder matrix
 
 | Stakeholder | Interest | Power | Position | Named actor(s) | Evidence |
 |-------------|----------|------:|----------|----------------|----------|
@@ -458,7 +452,7 @@ Six-lens stakeholder analysis. Lenses: **Government coalition**, **Opposition bl
 | **EU (Commission, Member States)** | Compatibility of utvisning with ECHR/EU law | Medium | Silent-monitoring | DG Home; Nordic partners | [ec.europa.eu](https://ec.europa.eu/) |
 | **Media ecosystem** | Stories for election cycle | Medium | Amplify drivmedel, utvisning, krigsmateriel | DN, SvD, SR, SVT | — |
 
-## Interest/Power grid
+### Interest/Power grid
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -485,7 +479,7 @@ quadrantChart
     "Media": [0.65, 0.65]
 ```
 
-## Influence network
+### Influence network
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -515,7 +509,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style C fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Winners and losers
+### Winners and losers
 
 | # | Winner / Loser | Actor | Reason | Evidence |
 |--:|----------------|-------|--------|----------|
@@ -533,12 +527,11 @@ flowchart LR
 *Every named actor is a public officeholder or public-interest organisation. GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) — data made manifestly public by data subjects.*
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgments from this analysis.
 
-## Near-term indicators (next 4 weeks, 2026-04-24 → 2026-05-22)
+### Near-term indicators (next 4 weeks, 2026-04-24 → 2026-05-22)
 
 | # | Indicator | Threshold | Trigger date | Source | Updates KJ |
 |--:|-----------|-----------|--------------|--------|------------|
@@ -548,7 +541,7 @@ Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgm
 | 4 | First kammardebatt on prop 236 | Scheduled kammardebatt | +21d (~2026-05-15) | [riksdagen.se calendar](https://www.riksdagen.se/) | KJ-3 |
 | 5 | SOFF response to MP vapenexport framework | First public statement | +21d (~2026-05-15) | [soff.se](https://soff.se/) | KJ-5 |
 
-## Mid-term indicators (4–12 weeks, 2026-05-22 → 2026-07-17)
+### Mid-term indicators (4–12 weeks, 2026-05-22 → 2026-07-17)
 
 | # | Indicator | Threshold | Trigger date | Source | Updates KJ |
 |--:|-----------|-----------|--------------|--------|------------|
@@ -560,7 +553,7 @@ Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgm
 | 11 | Kammarvote on prop 216 | Final count + any amendment | +8 weeks (~2026-06-15) | [riksdagen.se voteringar](https://www.riksdagen.se/) | KJ-4 |
 | 12 | Any Tidö MP abstain on ändringsbudget vote | Single abstention | +8 weeks (~2026-06-15) | Kammarvote record | KJ-1, S3 |
 
-## Long-term indicators (12+ weeks, toward 2026-09-13)
+### Long-term indicators (12+ weeks, toward 2026-09-13)
 
 | # | Indicator | Threshold | Trigger date | Source | Updates KJ |
 |--:|-----------|-----------|--------------|--------|------------|
@@ -571,7 +564,7 @@ Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgm
 | 17 | Election 2026-09-13 result | Final seat distribution | 2026-09-13 | [val.se](https://www.val.se/) | All KJs |
 | 18 | Post-election coalition formation | Regering formed / fails | 2026-09..2026-10 | [regeringen.se](https://www.regeringen.se/) | Scenario set |
 
-## Trigger-response mapping
+### Trigger-response mapping
 
 | If indicator fires | Expected action (next analysis pipeline) |
 |---------------------|------------------------------------------|
@@ -583,7 +576,7 @@ Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgm
 | #12 Tidö abstention | Immediate triage; S3 scenario update |
 | #17 L below 4% | Trigger post-election coalition re-analysis |
 
-## PIR coverage
+### PIR coverage
 
 | PIR | Covered by indicators |
 |-----|------------------------|
@@ -595,7 +588,7 @@ Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgm
 | PIR-6 Procedural integrity | #9, #12 |
 | PIR-7 Polling shift | #13 |
 
-## Update cadence
+### Update cadence
 
 - Next full re-run: 2026-05-15 (after 3 weeks of indicator data).
 - Interim spot-check: +7d (first utskott calendar entry).
@@ -608,12 +601,11 @@ Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgm
 ---
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 Three futures for the 9 Tidö bills (prop 214, 215, 216, 222, 223, 228, 229, 235, 236) given the motion wave. Probabilities sum to 100%.
 
-## Scenario overview
+### Scenario overview
 
 | Scenario | Probability | Confidence | Horizon |
 |----------|------------:|:----------:|---------|
@@ -621,7 +613,7 @@ Three futures for the 9 Tidö bills (prop 214, 215, 216, 222, 223, 228, 229, 235
 | S2 — Partial amendment, 2 bills fall | 30% | Moderate (B3) | 60–90 days |
 | S3 — Coalition stress, extra-budget vote fails | 15% | Low (C3) | 60–180 days |
 
-## S1 — Tidö holds (55%)
+### S1 — Tidö holds (55%)
 
 **Description**: All 9 bills adopted with minor utskott amendments. Tidö 176/349 seats prove durable despite fragmented opposition.
 
@@ -637,7 +629,7 @@ Three futures for the 9 Tidö bills (prop 214, 215, 216, 222, 223, 228, 229, 235
 
 **Evidence**: Tidö discipline across 2025–2026 ([regeringen.se](https://www.regeringen.se/)); zero SD counter-motions on this wave (dok_id manifest).
 
-## S2 — Partial amendment (30%)
+### S2 — Partial amendment (30%)
 
 **Description**: 2 of 9 bills substantially amended or withdrawn. Likely candidates: prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens — 4-party wave incl. C) and prop 236 (drivmedel — fiscal amplification).
 
@@ -653,7 +645,7 @@ Three futures for the 9 Tidö bills (prop 214, 215, 216, 222, 223, 228, 229, 235
 
 **Evidence**: C filed 5 motions including reform-not-reject on [HD024094](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html); 4-party convergence on prop 216.
 
-## S3 — Coalition stress / extra-budget fails (15%)
+### S3 — Coalition stress / extra-budget fails (15%)
 
 **Description**: Extra ändringsbudget route used for prop 236 fails; at least one Tidö party abstains. Triggers ordningsfråga and possible förtroendeomröstning.
 
@@ -669,7 +661,7 @@ Three futures for the 9 Tidö bills (prop 214, 215, 216, 222, 223, 228, 229, 235
 
 **Evidence**: Historical pattern — minority+support coalitions rarely complete without 1 stress event per mandatperiod. Tidö has been unusually stable 2022–2026.
 
-## Decision tree
+### Decision tree
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -693,7 +685,7 @@ flowchart TB
     style S3Path fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Scenario probability distribution
+### Scenario probability distribution
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -703,7 +695,7 @@ pie title Scenario probabilities (sum = 100%)
     "S3 Coalition stress" : 15
 ```
 
-## Early-warning indicators (F3EAD Disseminate → Find)
+### Early-warning indicators (F3EAD Disseminate → Find)
 
 | Indicator | Threshold | Source | Timing |
 |-----------|-----------|--------|--------|
@@ -721,12 +713,11 @@ pie title Scenario probabilities (sum = 100%)
 ---
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 Five-dimension risk register. **L** = Likelihood (1–5), **I** = Impact (1–5), **R** = L × I.
 
-## Risk register
+### Risk register
 
 | ID | Dimension | Risk description | L | I | **R** | Evidence | Mitigation |
 |----|-----------|------------------|--:|--:|------:|----------|-----------|
@@ -741,27 +732,27 @@ Five-dimension risk register. **L** = Likelihood (1–5), **I** = Impact (1–5)
 | R-9 | Legal | Utvisning regime (prop 235) produces ECHR-compatibility challenge; rapid LR case | 2 | 4 | **8** | [HD024090](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html) Motivering, prop 235 | Reserve analysis for betänkande hearing; cite MR-expert testimony |
 | R-10 | Institutional | Extra ändringsbudget procedure compresses debate time → reduces opposition visibility | 3 | 3 | **9** | FiU calendar, prop 236 special-budget route | Demand extended debate; file ordningsfråga |
 
-## Cascading-risk chains
+### Cascading-risk chains
 
-### Chain A — Drivmedel narrative lock-in
+#### Chain A — Drivmedel narrative lock-in
 ```
 R-1 (prop 236 passes) → R-4 (fiscal-anchor frame) → R-7 (Tidö incumbent advantage) → 2026 result
 ```
 If R-1 materialises without effective opposition counter-framing, R-4 and R-7 compound. **Posterior probability chain passes**: 0.70 × 0.55 × 0.60 ≈ **0.23**.
 
-### Chain B — Utvisning rule-of-law frame
+#### Chain B — Utvisning rule-of-law frame
 ```
 R-2 (V framed soft on crime) → R-9 (ECHR challenge surfaces late) → 2027 judicial correction
 ```
 **Posterior**: 0.55 × 0.25 × 0.40 ≈ **0.055**. Low but election-relevant if V response is slow.
 
-### Chain C — Foreign policy drift
+#### Chain C — Foreign policy drift
 ```
 R-6 (MP krigsmateriel instrumentalised) → S-MP alignment breach → post-election coalition failure
 ```
 **Posterior**: 0.30 × 0.40 × 0.35 ≈ **0.042**. Non-negligible for 2026 government formation.
 
-## Heat map
+### Heat map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -786,7 +777,7 @@ quadrantChart
     style R-1 fill:#ff006e
 ```
 
-## Posterior-probability update (Bayesian)
+### Posterior-probability update (Bayesian)
 
 Prior `P(Tidö bills pass substantially unchanged) = 0.65` (structural coalition math).
 Likelihood observations:
@@ -795,7 +786,7 @@ Likelihood observations:
 - Extra-budget procedural route → raise posterior
 Posterior `P(pass | observations) ≈ 0.72`. Distribution: 72% pass substantially unchanged, 18% pass with marginal amendment, 6% significant amendment, 4% withdrawal or replacement.
 
-## Top 3 actionable risks
+### Top 3 actionable risks
 
 1. **R-1** (R=16): Drivmedel narrative lock-in — highest combined score.
 2. **R-2** (R=12): V soft-on-crime frame — reputational risk for V coalition value.
@@ -806,10 +797,9 @@ Posterior `P(pass | observations) ≈ 0.72`. Distribution: 72% pass substantiall
 *Evidence standard: all scores substantiated by at least one `dok_id` or primary-source URL. Cross-reference → `threat-analysis.md` for adversary-perspective complement.*
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md)_
-
-## Executive SWOT grid
+### Executive SWOT grid
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -829,63 +819,63 @@ quadrantChart
     "Coalition math 349 seats": [0.85, 0.20]
 ```
 
-## Strengths
+### Strengths
 
-### S-1 · Coordinated trilateral framing on fiscal axis
+#### S-1 · Coordinated trilateral framing on fiscal axis
 Three left-bloc parties simultaneously filed motions against prop 2025/26:236 within 48 hours — S ([HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html)), V ([HD024092](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html)), MP ([HD024098](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html)). Evidence: temporal clustering (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17), all filed in same utskott (FiU). Demonstrates operational coordination capacity for 2026 campaign.
 
-### S-2 · S positions as fiscal anchor
+#### S-2 · S positions as fiscal anchor
 S under Mikael Damberg ([HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html)) proposes constructive alternative rather than pure avslag — institutional competence signalling for 2026 government-formation credibility. Evidence: motion text calls for regeringen to "återkomma till riksdagen" with revised framework rather than rejecting outright.
 
-### S-3 · MP owns climate and vapenexport axes cleanly
+#### S-3 · MP owns climate and vapenexport axes cleanly
 MP is the only party filing on prop 228 ([HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html)) with a full export-ban proposition — gives MP unique ownership of two election-relevant frames (climate via drivmedel, ethics via vapenexport). Evidence: no parallel S or V motion proposing full ban.
 
-### S-4 · C differentiated centre-reform profile
+#### S-4 · C differentiated centre-reform profile
 C filed on 5 distinct propositions ([HD024088](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html), [HD024089](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html), [HD024093](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html), [HD024094](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html), [HD024095](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html)) with consistently procedural/reform language — maintains C as a non-Tidö bourgeois alternative.
 
-## Weaknesses
+### Weaknesses
 
-### W-1 · Absence of coordinated judicial-policy counter-frame
+#### W-1 · Absence of coordinated judicial-policy counter-frame
 Opposition filed 3 motions on prop 235 (utvisning) but with fundamentally divergent lines: V wants full avslag ([HD024090](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html)), MP wants partial avslag ([HD024097](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html)), C wants systematik-krav ([HD024095](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html)). This is three parallel messages, not one — weakens narrative cohesion.
 
-### W-2 · S silence on vapenexport
+#### W-2 · S silence on vapenexport
 S filed zero motions against prop 228 (krigsmateriel). Leaves MP (and partly V) to carry the line alone. A red-green coalition scenario requires S-MP alignment on foreign policy; this divergence will be used by Tidö parties in 2026 campaign framing.
 
-### W-3 · No cross-bloc bridge on welfare
+#### W-3 · No cross-bloc bridge on welfare
 Three motions on prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens) from S/V/C — but no sign of coordinated amendment package. Opposition is parallel, not integrated. Evidence: three distinct utskott filings with different legal pathways.
 
-### W-4 · Limited full-text signalling
+#### W-4 · Limited full-text signalling
 All 20 motions retrieved as metadata-only summaries at retrieval time; deeper textual coordination (wording overlap, shared legal analysis) cannot be verified at this resolution. Pass-2 remediation: prioritise `get_dokument_innehall` for P0/P1 documents in next run.
 
-## Opportunities
+### Opportunities
 
-### O-1 · Election-cycle narrative peg
+#### O-1 · Election-cycle narrative peg
 Drivmedel is Sweden's most-polled cost-of-living issue in 2026 (SCB KPI-F fuel indices persistently salient). The S motion ([HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html)) can anchor a broader oppositions-own-the-economy narrative through summer.
 
-### O-2 · Rule-of-law debate on prop 235
+#### O-2 · Rule-of-law debate on prop 235
 Three opposition motions ([HD024090](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html), [HD024095](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html), [HD024097](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html)) collectively put proportionality/legal-certainty back on the agenda — creates coverage window for constitutional-committee (KU) scrutiny lines in opposition.
 
-### O-3 · Coalition demarcation for 2026
+#### O-3 · Coalition demarcation for 2026
 The motion wave crystallises the S-V-MP-C quartet's distinct positions. Election debates can now reference concrete differentiation rather than abstract positioning.
 
-### O-4 · Committee-work visibility
+#### O-4 · Committee-work visibility
 With 6 different utskott touched (FiU, UU, SoU, SfU, CU, AU, FöU), opposition gains recurring media moments throughout the betänkande calendar — each utskott report surfaces the opposition line separately.
 
-## Threats
+### Threats
 
-### T-1 · Tidö arithmetic remains intact
+#### T-1 · Tidö arithmetic remains intact
 M (68 seats) + SD (73) + KD (19) + L (16) = 176 seats vs 173-seat opposition. Motion wave does not alter coalition math. Evidence: Riksdag seat distribution 2022 baseline. **Admiralty A1**.
 
-### T-2 · SD lock-in removes right-flank pressure
+#### T-2 · SD lock-in removes right-flank pressure
 SD filed zero motions against any of the 9 propositions. This means there is no realistic path to Tidö amendment from internal-coalition dissent. Full base available via [search_voteringar](https://data.riksdagen.se/voteringlista/?rm=2025/26).
 
-### T-3 · Drivmedel tax cut is popular even among opposition voters
+#### T-3 · Drivmedel tax cut is popular even among opposition voters
 KPI trend since 2022 makes fuel-price relief broadly popular. Opposition avslag position risks class-cleavage backlash (rural/commuter vs urban). The V full-avslag line ([HD024092](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html)) carries distributional risk.
 
-### T-4 · Parallel bill flow crowds out narrative
+#### T-4 · Parallel bill flow crowds out narrative
 The 9 propositions in one 72-hour motion window dilute media attention per bill — drivmedel may dominate, but prop 216 (kommun-vård) risks being under-covered.
 
-## TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)
+### TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)
 
 | Factor | Leverage for | Exploit by |
 |--------|-------------|-----------|
@@ -895,7 +885,7 @@ The 9 propositions in one 72-hour motion window dilute media attention per bill
 | S4 × O3 | C differentiated + coalition demarcation | C targets bourgeois-curious M/L voters who reject SD but approve of Tidö economics |
 | W2 × T2 | S silence on vapenexport + SD lock-in | S's silence ensures Tidö defence-industry consensus holds regardless of MP pressure |
 
-## Cross-SWOT
+### Cross-SWOT
 
 - **S/W pairing**: S-1 (trilateral coord) is real only on fiscal; W-1 (divergent justice) shows it does not generalise. Coordination is issue-specific, not structural.
 - **S/O**: S-3 (MP clean ownership) × O-3 (coalition demarcation) strengthens a multi-party Left narrative where each party has a distinct role.
@@ -908,14 +898,13 @@ The 9 propositions in one 72-hour motion window dilute media attention per bill
 ---
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Overall Threat Level**: HIGH · **Severity**: HIGH (T-4, T-7) / MEDIUM (T-1, T-2, T-3, T-5) / LOW (T-6) · **Confidence**: MEDIUM (B2 — multi-source motion-wave pattern, plausibility judgements per row).
 
 This analysis adopts the Political Threat Taxonomy — adversarial actors, techniques, and targets that could exploit or undermine the democratic process around this motion wave. **This is NOT political opposition research**; it is threat modelling against democratic legitimacy.
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy
+### Political Threat Taxonomy
 
 | Threat ID | Actor class | Technique | Target | Plausibility |
 |-----------|-------------|-----------|--------|-------------:|
@@ -927,7 +916,7 @@ This analysis adopts the Political Threat Taxonomy — adversarial actors, techn
 | T-6 | Cyber | Attempt to compromise Riksdag.se delivery of motion documents during debate window | Information integrity | Low |
 | T-7 | Institutional | Utskott-chair use of extra-budget procedure ([prop 236](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html) FiU route) to compress opposition time | Deliberative quality | High |
 
-## Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo on drivmedel)
+### Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo on drivmedel)
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -952,7 +941,7 @@ flowchart TB
     style B fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Kill chain — T-2 (Nato-alliance framing on krigsmateriel)
+### Kill chain — T-2 (Nato-alliance framing on krigsmateriel)
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -968,7 +957,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style Ob fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## MITRE-style TTP mapping
+### MITRE-style TTP mapping
 
 | Tactic | Technique | Procedure (observed / plausible) | Evidence |
 |--------|-----------|----------------------------------|----------|
@@ -978,7 +967,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | TA-Amplify | Bot / coordinated inauthentic | Reshare cycles on X/Facebook during utskott hearings | riksdagen.se calendar |
 | TA-Suppress | Procedural compression | Extra ändringsbudget route (prop 236) | [HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html) FiU timeline |
 
-## Adversary goals & cost/impact ranking
+### Adversary goals & cost/impact ranking
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -999,14 +988,14 @@ quadrantChart
     "T-7 procedural compression": [0.85, 0.65]
 ```
 
-## Defensive recommendations
+### Defensive recommendations
 
 1. **Against T-4**: S and V independently publish plain-language explainers of their drivmedel motions within 72 hours of first debate; cite [HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html) and [HD024092](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html) directly.
 2. **Against T-2**: MP coordinates with Swedish embassy comms on English-language explanation of [HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html), distinguishing ethical-export framework from Nato alignment.
 3. **Against T-7**: Opposition files ordningsfråga at extra-budget procedural votes; document compression in KU annual report.
 4. **Against T-3**: Coordination with MSB (Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap) on monitoring extremist mobilisation around prop 235 debate windows ([msb.se](https://www.msb.se/)).
 
-## Residual threat posture
+### Residual threat posture
 
 - High-plausibility / high-impact quadrant: T-4, T-2, T-7.
 - Watch list next 30 days: platform-level content around drivmedel and utvisning debates.
@@ -1019,27 +1008,26 @@ quadrantChart
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD024078
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024078-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024078-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024078 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html) · **Party**: S · **Committee**: SoU · **Responds to**: Prop 216 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 S motion demanding broader kommun-sektor consultation before any reform to medicinsk legitimationsprocess. Flags risk that the Tidö proposition moves too fast without workforce-pipeline data.
 
-## Key yrkanden (inferred)
+### Key yrkanden (inferred)
 1. Kommunsektor-samråd must precede final utformning.
 2. Socialstyrelsen kapacitet måste bekräftas.
 3. Begär återkomma till riksdagen med förslag.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW score**: 6.8 (high — 4-party wave context)
 - **Classification**: Welfare / implementation risk / P1
 - **Political significance**: S positioning on kommun-sektor worker interests pre-election; consistent with segment A and E mobilisation ([voter-segmentation.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md)).
 - **Implementation risk**: High for prop 216 overall ([implementation-feasibility.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md)).
 - **Coordination signal**: Part of 4-party wave with [HD024083](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md), [HD024087](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md), [HD024094](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Low probability of motion passage standalone; high influence on betänkande amendment text.
 - Narrative value for S: fiscal-ansvarsfull + kommun-sektor ansvar framing.
 
@@ -1047,26 +1035,25 @@ S motion demanding broader kommun-sektor consultation before any reform to medic
 *Source: `get_motioner` (riksdag-regering MCP).*
 
 ### HD024079
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024079-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024079-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024079 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html) · **Party**: S · **Committee**: UU · **Responds to**: Prop 228 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 S motion on proposed amendments to the swedish arms-export regime (prop 228). S frames as pragmatic support with amendment; not a ban.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Utvidgad transparens.
 2. ISP-kapacitet måste säkerställas.
 3. Återrapportering till UU årligen.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 6.2 (med-high)
 - **Classification**: Defence / foreign-policy / P1
 - **Political significance**: S positions between MP ethical framework and Tidö status quo — centre-pragmatic.
 - **Coordination signal**: Three-party cluster with [HD024091](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md) (V) and [HD024096](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md) (MP) — divergent content.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Motion likely to be absorbed into betänkande as minority reservation.
 - Clarifies S–MP policy distance.
 
@@ -1074,52 +1061,50 @@ S motion on proposed amendments to the swedish arms-export regime (prop 228). S
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024080
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024080-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024080-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024080 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024080.html) · **Party**: S · **Committee**: AU · **Responds to**: Prop 222 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 S motion seeking amendments to ersättningsregler in prop 222. Focus on pensioner/sickness-benefit integrity.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Mildare trappor vid långvarig sjukfrånvaro.
 2. Administrativ förenkling.
 3. Bevaka pensionärsinkomst.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 4.1 (medium)
 - **Classification**: Welfare / labour / P2
 - **Political significance**: Targets segment E (pensioners, 22% of electorate, S-strong).
 - **Coordination**: Paired with MP [HD024086](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Moderate salience; stable S-base motion.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024081
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024081-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024081-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024081 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html) · **Party**: S · **Committee**: SfU · **Responds to**: Prop 235 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 S motion with rättssäkerhets-amendments to prop 235 utvisning reform. Not an avslag; a technical reform motion.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Domstolsprövning-tillgång måste säkerställas.
 2. Tidsramar för överklaganden rimliga.
 3. ECHR-kompatibilitet bekräftas.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 6.5 (high)
 - **Classification**: Migration / rule-of-law / P1
 - **Political significance**: S centrist positioning — accepts Tidö hardening framework but amends implementation.
 - **Coordination**: Paired with [HD024090](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md) V full avslag and [HD024097](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md) MP reform.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Distinguishes S from both Tidö and V on this axis.
 - Retains centre-right swing voter potential.
 
@@ -1127,28 +1112,27 @@ S motion with rättssäkerhets-amendments to prop 235 utvisning reform. Not an a
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024082
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024082-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024082 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html) · **Party**: S · **Committee**: FiU · **Responds to**: Prop 236 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 **Lead motion of the entire wave.** S positions as fiscal-anchor — challenges extra ändringsbudget-finansieringen för drivmedel-reduktion utan tydlig motsvarande besparing.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Riksdagen begär regeringens fullständiga finansieringsförslag.
 2. FiU måste granska makroekonomisk effekt.
 3. Extra ändringsbudget-proceduren ifrågasätts.
 4. Återkomma till riksdagen.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 8.4 (highest in wave)
 - **Classification**: Fiscal / macroeconomic / P0
 - **Political significance**: Central narrative hook — "S tar fighten om drivmedel" per [media-framing-analysis.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md).
 - **Electoral relevance**: Segment A (rural, 18%) + E (pensioners, 22%) = 40% of electorate mobilisation potential ([voter-segmentation.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md)).
 - **Coordination**: Lead of 3-party cluster with [HD024092](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md) (V) + [HD024098](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md) (MP).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Highest 2026 electoral salience of any single motion in the wave.
 - Procedural challenge to ändringsbudget route creates S3 scenario trigger.
 - Setter the frame for Almedalsveckan 2026 speeches.
@@ -1157,26 +1141,25 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmo
 *Source: `get_motioner`. Primary campaign-narrative document.*
 
 ### HD024083
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024083-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024083-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024083 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html) · **Party**: V · **Committee**: SoU · **Responds to**: Prop 216 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 V motion calling for avslag on prop 216 absent funded workforce pipeline; argues the reform erodes kommun-sector capacity.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Riksdagen avslår prop 216.
 2. Begär återkomma med finansierat förslag.
 3. Kommunsektor-ekonomisk analys krävs.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 6.4 (high)
 - **Classification**: Welfare / implementation risk / P1
 - **Political significance**: V base mobilisation on public-sector worker rights.
 - **Coordination**: Part of **4-party wave** on prop 216 with S/MP/C — strongest coordination of entire motion wave.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Binary avslag position; differs from S amendment approach.
 - Raises SoU betänkande amendment probability.
 
@@ -1184,125 +1167,120 @@ V motion calling for avslag on prop 216 absent funded workforce pipeline; argues
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024084
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024084-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024084-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024084 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html) · **Party**: V · **Committee**: CU · **Responds to**: Prop 223 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 V motion demands stricter konsumentskydd än prop 223 som drafted; specifically högre räntetak and stricter marknadsföringsförbud.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Lägre räntetak än regeringens förslag.
 2. Marknadsföringsförbud för snabblån.
 3. Förstärkt Konsumentverket-tillsyn.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 4.4 (medium)
 - **Classification**: Consumer protection / civil rights / P2
 - **Coordination**: Paired with C [HD024088](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md) — 2-party.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Technical policy motion; low campaign salience but stable V-base signal.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024085
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024085-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024085-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024085 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html) · **Party**: MP · **Committee**: FöU · **Responds to**: Prop 214 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 MP motion on prop 214 cyber reform — adds privacy/civil-liberty dimensions to cybersäkerhetsreformen.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Integritetsskydd måste balansera NIS2-implementering.
 2. PTS-tillsyn oberoende.
 3. Medborgarrättsligt perspektiv i utformning.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 3.8 (medium-low)
 - **Classification**: Cyber / civil rights / P2
 - **Coordination**: Paired with C [HD024095](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Niche but differentiating; positions MP on civil-liberties axis.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024086
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024086-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024086-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024086 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html) · **Party**: MP · **Committee**: AU · **Responds to**: Prop 222 · **Filed**: 2026-04-15
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 MP motion on ersättningsreformen; adds jämställdhets- and miljö-dimensioner till arbetslöshets-/sjukersättning.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Jämställd utformning av trappor.
 2. Omställningsstöd i klimatomställning ska ingå.
 3. Återkomma med förslag.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 3.9 (medium)
 - **Classification**: Welfare / labour / P2
 - **Coordination**: 2-party with S [HD024080](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Moderate salience; differentiates MP on klimat+omställning integration.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024087
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024087-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024087-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024087 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html) · **Party**: MP · **Committee**: SoU · **Responds to**: Prop 216 · **Filed**: 2026-04-16
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 MP motion mot prop 216 — kräver klimatkompetens-integration i hälso- och sjukvårdsutbildning; betonar jämlikhet.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Klimatkompetens i utbildningsreformen.
 2. Regional jämlik tillgång.
 3. Icke-diskriminering i legitimationsprocess.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 4.8 (medium)
 - **Classification**: Welfare / climate integration / P2
 - **Coordination**: **4-party wave** with S [HD024078](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md), V [HD024083](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md), C [HD024094](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Specialised angle; contributes to wave coordination signal but unique framing.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024088
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024088-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024088-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024088 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html) · **Party**: C · **Committee**: CU · **Responds to**: Prop 223 · **Filed**: 2026-04-16
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 C motion med reform-inte-avslag stance på prop 223 — fokus på småföretagens kreditgivning.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. SME-anpassning av regelverket.
 2. Digital tillsyn.
 3. Utvärdering efter 24 månader.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 3.6 (medium-low)
 - **Classification**: Consumer / SME / P2
 - **Coordination**: 2-party with V [HD024084](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md) — divergent content.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Positioning: centre-reform, not oppositionell avslag.
 - Part of C 5-motion differentiation strategy.
 
@@ -1310,25 +1288,24 @@ C motion med reform-inte-avslag stance på prop 223 — fokus på småföretagen
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024089
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024089-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024089-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024089 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html) · **Party**: C · **Committee**: SfU · **Responds to**: Prop 229 · **Filed**: 2026-04-16
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 C motion på kommunal ersättningsnivå i prop 229 mottagandelag — krever kommunkompensation vid kapacitetskrav.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Full kommunersättning.
 2. Regional fördelningsmekanism.
 3. SKR-samråd före ikraftträdande.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 5.4 (medium-high)
 - **Classification**: Migration / kommun economy / P1
 - **Coordination**: Solo C motion (no other party matches).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Plays kommunsektor-expertise card — C's traditional strength.
 - Links mottagandelag to [HD024094](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md) (healthcare workforce) thematically.
 
@@ -1336,25 +1313,24 @@ C motion på kommunal ersättningsnivå i prop 229 mottagandelag — krever komm
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024090
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024090-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024090-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024090 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html) · **Party**: V · **Committee**: SfU · **Responds to**: Prop 235 · **Filed**: 2026-04-16
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 V full avslag på prop 235 — ECHR-kompatibilitet ifrågasatt, rättssäkerhetsrisk.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Riksdagen avslår prop 235 i sin helhet.
 2. Begär ECHR-analys.
 3. Rättspraxis-sammanställning.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 7.2 (high)
 - **Classification**: Migration / human-rights / P0
 - **Coordination**: 3-party with S [HD024081](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md), MP [HD024097](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md) — **divergent** (S amendment vs V avslag vs MP reform).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Maximal differentiation V vs Tidö on migration.
 - Mobilises V base but may alienate swing voters.
 
@@ -1362,50 +1338,48 @@ V full avslag på prop 235 — ECHR-kompatibilitet ifrågasatt, rättssäkerhets
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024091
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024091-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024091-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024091 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html) · **Party**: V · **Committee**: UU · **Responds to**: Prop 228 · **Filed**: 2026-04-16
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 V full avslag på prop 228 — vapenexport-liberalisering avvisas principiellt.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Avslag.
 2. Översyn av svensk vapenexportpolicy.
 3. UN Arms Trade Treaty-stärkning.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 6.8 (high)
 - **Classification**: Defence / foreign-policy / P1
 - **Coordination**: 3-party with S [HD024079](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md), MP [HD024096](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md) — divergent content.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - V-base signal on pacifism + anti-imperialist framing.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024092
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024092-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024092-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024092 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html) · **Party**: V · **Committee**: FiU · **Responds to**: Prop 236 · **Filed**: 2026-04-17
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 V motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktionen — begär förstärkt kollektivtrafik i stället.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Avvisning av drivmedels-reduktionsprincipen.
 2. Motförslag: förstärkt regional kollektivtrafik.
 3. Klimatskatteprincip bevaras.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 7.6 (high)
 - **Classification**: Fiscal / climate / P0
 - **Coordination**: 3-party with S [HD024082](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md) lead + MP [HD024098](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - V differentierar sig från S finanspolitisk framing → klimatmoralisk framing.
 - Urban segment (D, 20%) mobilisation potential.
 
@@ -1413,50 +1387,48 @@ V motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktionen — begär förstärkt kollektivtraf
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024093
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024093-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024093-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024093 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html) · **Party**: C · **Committee**: TU · **Responds to**: Prop 215 · **Filed**: 2026-04-17
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 C motion på digitaliseringsreformen — fokus på rural bredbandsutbyggnad och SME-access.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Geografisk jämlikhet i utrullning.
 2. SME-skräddarsydda e-tjänster.
 3. PTS-rapportering per kvartal.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 3.3 (medium-low)
 - **Classification**: Digital / regional / P2
 - **Coordination**: Solo C motion.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Rural-voter positioning (segment A overlap).
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024094
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024094-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024094-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024094 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html) · **Party**: C · **Committee**: SoU · **Responds to**: Prop 216 · **Filed**: 2026-04-17
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 C motion på prop 216 — regional jämlik tillgång, SKR-samråd, kommunekonomisk analys.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Regional tillgänglighet.
 2. SKR-samråd.
 3. Kommunersättning vid ny capacitetsförfrågan.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 5.0 (medium)
 - **Classification**: Welfare / kommun / P1
 - **Coordination**: **4-party wave** with S/V/MP — strongest coordination signal of the wave.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - C sätter kommun-sektor expertise-stämpel på wave.
 - Lägger grunden till SoU betänkande-amendment.
 
@@ -1464,100 +1436,96 @@ C motion på prop 216 — regional jämlik tillgång, SKR-samråd, kommunekonomi
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024095
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024095-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024095-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024095 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html) · **Party**: C · **Committee**: FöU · **Responds to**: Prop 214 · **Filed**: 2026-04-17
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 C motion på prop 214 cybersäkerhet — SME-fokus + implementation cost.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. SME-anpassning av NIS2.
 2. Implementeringskostnad till små företag begränsad.
 3. Utvärdering efter 24 månader.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 3.1 (medium-low)
 - **Classification**: Cyber / SME / P2
 - **Coordination**: 2-party with MP [HD024085](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md) — divergent content.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Low salience; stable reform-framing signature C pursues.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024096
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024096-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024096-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024096 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html) · **Party**: MP · **Committee**: UU · **Responds to**: Prop 228 · **Filed**: 2026-04-17
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 MP motion på prop 228 vapenexport — etisk ramverks-amendment, klimatdimension.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Etisk ramverk före export-liberalisering.
 2. Klimatsäkerhetsperspektiv integreras.
 3. Demokratiklausul stärks.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 5.8 (medium-high)
 - **Classification**: Defence / ethics / P1
 - **Coordination**: 3-party with S [HD024079](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md), V [HD024091](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md) — divergent.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Distinguishes MP on etisk/klimat integration.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024097
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024097-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024097-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024097 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html) · **Party**: MP · **Committee**: SfU · **Responds to**: Prop 235 · **Filed**: 2026-04-17
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 MP motion på prop 235 — reform-ansats, ECHR-kompatibilitet säkerställs, humanitära hänsyn.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. ECHR-analys.
 2. Humanitära skyddsregler.
 3. Återkomma med reformerat förslag.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 6.4 (high)
 - **Classification**: Migration / human-rights / P1
 - **Coordination**: 3-party with S [HD024081](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md), V [HD024090](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md) — divergent.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - Positions MP mellan S amendment och V avslag.
 
 ---
 *Source: `get_motioner`.*
 
 ### HD024098
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD024098-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD024098-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD024098 · [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html) · **Party**: MP · **Committee**: FiU · **Responds to**: Prop 236 · **Filed**: 2026-04-17
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 MP motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktion — klimat-principiell avslag.
 
-## Key yrkanden
+### Key yrkanden
 1. Avslag på drivmedelsreduktionen.
 2. Klimatpolitiska ramverket försvaras.
 3. Istället: utvidgad bidrag till omställningen.
 
-## Analysis
+### Analysis
 - **DIW**: 7.2 (high)
 - **Classification**: Fiscal / climate / P0
 - **Coordination**: 3-party with S [HD024082](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md) lead + V [HD024092](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md).
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 - MP mobiliserar segment D (urban climate) mot Tidö.
 - Central klimatnarrativ inför 2026.
 
@@ -1565,12 +1533,11 @@ MP motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktion — klimat-principiell avslag.
 *Source: `get_motioner`. Part of highest-salience 3-motion cluster.*
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 The motion wave of 2026-04-24 lands ~4.5 months before the Swedish parliamentary election of 2026-09-13. This analysis maps motion content to 2026 campaign axes.
 
-## Electoral landscape pre-motion
+### Electoral landscape pre-motion
 
 | Party | 2022 result | Trend (Novus avg Q1 2026) | Trajectory |
 |-------|-----------:|------------:|------------|
@@ -1585,7 +1552,7 @@ The motion wave of 2026-04-24 lands ~4.5 months before the Swedish parliamentary
 
 *Source: aggregate of publicly reported Novus/Demoskop/Ipsos; April 2026.*
 
-## Campaign axes activated by motion wave
+### Campaign axes activated by motion wave
 
 1. **Fiscal / cost-of-living** — drivmedel cluster (prop 236) mobilises rural/commuter vote.
 2. **Migration / rule-of-law** — utvisning cluster (prop 235) mobilises centre-right identity vote + V/MP civil-rights base.
@@ -1594,7 +1561,7 @@ The motion wave of 2026-04-24 lands ~4.5 months before the Swedish parliamentary
 5. **Civil rights / cyber** — prop 214 creates smaller axis but differentiates MP/C.
 6. **Social policy / protection of vulnerable** — ersättning (prop 222) + konsumkredit (prop 223) mobilise welfare-sensitive voters.
 
-## Motion-to-vote translation matrix
+### Motion-to-vote translation matrix
 
 | Motion cluster | Voter segment targeted | Expected net effect (party) | Evidence |
 |----------------|-----------------------|------------------------------|----------|
@@ -1606,7 +1573,7 @@ The motion wave of 2026-04-24 lands ~4.5 months before the Swedish parliamentary
 | Krigsmateriel | Ethical-foreign-policy voters | +0.2 to +0.4% MP | [HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html) |
 | Cybersäk | Reform-centre voters | +0.1 to +0.2% C | [HD024095](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html) |
 
-## Seat-projection sensitivity
+### Seat-projection sensitivity
 
 | Scenario (Sep 2026) | S | M | SD | V | C | KD | MP | L | Tidö total |
 |---------------------|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|
@@ -1617,14 +1584,14 @@ The motion wave of 2026-04-24 lands ~4.5 months before the Swedish parliamentary
 
 *Seat allocation via Sainte-Laguë method; 349 seats, 4% national threshold.*
 
-## Threshold-risk parties
+### Threshold-risk parties
 
 - **C** (4.5%): motion filings (5 motions incl. reform content) aim to differentiate from S — critical survival lever.
 - **L** (3.8%): zero motions this wave; L relies on Tidö coalition visibility, not parliamentary activism.
 - **MP** (4.2%): 6 motions create signal but threshold vulnerability remains.
 - **KD** (5.1%): safely above threshold, no motion activity in wave.
 
-## Campaign narrative construction
+### Campaign narrative construction
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -1648,7 +1615,7 @@ flowchart TB
     style SD fill:#ffd700,stroke:#000,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Electoral key dates
+### Electoral key dates
 
 | Date | Event | Motion relevance |
 |------|-------|-----------------|
@@ -1658,7 +1625,7 @@ flowchart TB
 | 2026-08 | Formal campaign start | Motions cited in party manifestos |
 | 2026-09-13 | Election day | Motion-mobilised blocs go to polls |
 
-## Judgments
+### Judgments
 
 - Motion wave amplifies S fiscal-anchor narrative more than any other single event Q2 2026.
 - C needs every motion-driven differentiation event to survive 4% threshold; MP in similar position.
@@ -1670,10 +1637,9 @@ flowchart TB
 *All percentages are public polling averages. All seat projections are analyst estimates, not predictions.*
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)_
-
-## Current Riksdag seat distribution (2022–2026 mandate)
+### Current Riksdag seat distribution (2022–2026 mandate)
 
 | Party | Seats | Mandat | Bloc | Ja / Nej / Avstår on Tidö bills 214–236 (expected) |
 |-------|------:|------:|------|----------------------------------------------------:|
@@ -1687,7 +1653,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 | L | 16 | 16 | Tidö | Ja |
 | **Total** | **349** | **349** | | |
 
-## Tidö vote-math on each bill
+### Tidö vote-math on each bill
 
 | Bill | Expected Ja | Expected Nej | Expected Avstår | Margin | Pass? |
 |------|:-----------:|:------------:|:---------------:|:------:|:-----:|
@@ -1703,31 +1669,31 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 *Extra ändringsbudget route requires Finansutskottet majority + kammarmajoritet; Tidö holds both 176/349.*
 
-## Opposition coalition pathways
+### Opposition coalition pathways
 
-### Path A — Classical red-green-centre (S+V+MP+C)
+#### Path A — Classical red-green-centre (S+V+MP+C)
 **Seats**: 107 + 24 + 18 + 24 = **173/349** → 3 seats short of majority.  
 **Feasibility**: Low — requires all 4 opposition parties in lockstep; C-V ideological gap historical barrier.  
 **Motion evidence**: Only prop 216 shows 4-party wave; other bills show fragmentation.
 
-### Path B — Red-red (S+V+MP)
+#### Path B — Red-red (S+V+MP)
 **Seats**: 107 + 24 + 18 = **149/349** → 26 seats short. Non-viable without C.
 
-### Path C — Red + centre (S+C)
+#### Path C — Red + centre (S+C)
 **Seats**: 107 + 24 = **131/349** → 44 seats short. Non-viable.
 
-### Path D — Tidö defection scenario (Tidö − L = 160)
+#### Path D — Tidö defection scenario (Tidö − L = 160)
 **Seats**: 176 − 16 = **160/349** → 14 seats short. If L leaves Tidö, government falls.  
 **Feasibility**: Low in 2026 mandate; L polling below threshold disincentivises defection (lose-lose).
 
-## Motion-to-vote mapping
+### Motion-to-vote mapping
 
 - **Motion filings do not alter seat math**. 20 motions produce floor speeches + betänkande content, not vote changes.
 - **Motion content can alter public opinion** which influences 2026-09 election, which reshapes post-election coalition math.
 
-## Post-2026 election scenarios (projected)
+### Post-2026 election scenarios (projected)
 
-### Scenario P1 — Tidö continuation (probable if no major shift)
+#### Scenario P1 — Tidö continuation (probable if no major shift)
 | Party | Projected seats | Bloc |
 |-------|---------------:|------|
 | S | 111 | Opp |
@@ -1743,16 +1709,16 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 **Judgment**: Near tie; L's threshold survival is decisive. If L drops below 4%, Tidö falls to 161; opposition potentially 179.
 
-### Scenario P2 — S-led government (requires S+V+MP+C)
+#### Scenario P2 — S-led government (requires S+V+MP+C)
 | Need | Seat requirement |
 |------|:----------------:|
 | Red-green-centre majority | ≥ 175 |
 | Feasible only if MP ≥ 5%, C ≥ 5% | Both near threshold |
 
-### Scenario P3 — Grand coalition S+M
+#### Scenario P3 — Grand coalition S+M
 **Historical precedent**: None in modern era; improbable.
 
-## Coalition stability indicators
+### Coalition stability indicators
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -1770,7 +1736,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style RedGreen fill:#e30613,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Key judgments
+### Key judgments
 
 - Tidö 176/349 is sufficient for every single vote in the 2026-04-24 motion cluster; no opposition coalition can block passage.
 - Post-2026 coalition math depends almost entirely on L threshold survival and SD/M relative share; motion content influences this indirectly.
@@ -1784,56 +1750,55 @@ flowchart LR
 ---
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
-
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md)_
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
 Maps motions to Swedish voter segments. Based on publicly available SCB demography, Novus/Demoskop issue-salience surveys, and published electoral-research typologies.
 
-## Primary voter segments
+### Primary voter segments
 
-### Segment A — Rural/Commuter (~18% of electorate)
+#### Segment A — Rural/Commuter (~18% of electorate)
 **Demographics**: Geographic rural, high fuel dependency, median age 45–65.  
 **Top issues**: Fuel price, healthcare access, school closures.  
 **Motion relevance**: Drivmedel cluster ([HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html), [HD024092](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html), [HD024098](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html)); prop 216 (rural healthcare).  
 **2022 vote split**: S 28%, M 20%, SD 25%, KD 7%, C 10%, other 10%.  
 **Likely shift from motion wave**: +0.5–1.0% S, −0.5% M.
 
-### Segment B — Urban professional (~22%)
+#### Segment B — Urban professional (~22%)
 **Demographics**: Stockholm/Göteborg/Malmö urban cores, tertiary educated.  
 **Top issues**: Climate, international policy, welfare.  
 **Motion relevance**: Krigsmateriel ([HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html)); drivmedel (climate framing MP/V).  
 **2022 split**: S 32%, M 22%, V 12%, MP 8%, L 7%, C 5%, SD 8%, KD 2%, other 4%.  
 **Likely shift**: +0.3–0.5% V/MP, stable S.
 
-### Segment C — Suburban middle (~24%)
+#### Segment C — Suburban middle (~24%)
 **Demographics**: Medelinkomst, småhus, 30–55 years, kommun vs kommun varierande.  
 **Top issues**: Migration, healthcare queues, trygghet.  
 **Motion relevance**: Utvisning (prop 235); prop 216 (healthcare).  
 **2022 split**: S 26%, M 22%, SD 22%, KD 7%, C 6%, L 5%, V 5%, MP 5%, other 2%.  
 **Likely shift**: stable to +0.5% SD on migration salience; +0.3% S on healthcare.
 
-### Segment D — Young voter (18–29, ~15%)
+#### Segment D — Young voter (18–29, ~15%)
 **Demographics**: Urban, high education, high climate concern, high migration tolerance.  
 **Top issues**: Climate, housing, civil rights.  
 **Motion relevance**: Krigsmateriel (MP), drivmedel (climate framing), utvisning (V rights framing).  
 **2022 split**: S 20%, M 10%, SD 15%, V 20%, MP 15%, C 8%, KD 4%, L 3%, other 5%.  
 **Likely shift**: +0.5–1.0% V, +0.3–0.5% MP.
 
-### Segment E — Retired pensioners (65+, ~22%)
+#### Segment E — Retired pensioners (65+, ~22%)
 **Demographics**: Pensionsmottagare, geographic mixed, heavy healthcare reliance.  
 **Top issues**: Pension, healthcare, trygghet.  
 **Motion relevance**: prop 222 (ersättning); prop 216 (healthcare).  
 **2022 split**: S 34%, M 20%, SD 20%, KD 10%, C 6%, V 4%, MP 2%, L 2%, other 2%.  
 **Likely shift**: +0.3% S, stable SD.
 
-### Segment F — Civil-society activist (~5%)
+#### Segment F — Civil-society activist (~5%)
 **Demographics**: Cross-generation, high political engagement, media-connected.  
 **Top issues**: Rättssäkerhet, human rights, environmental policy.  
 **Motion relevance**: Utvisning (V/MP framing); vapenexport (MP).  
 **2022 split**: V 30%, MP 25%, S 20%, C 10%, L 5%, M 5%, SD 3%, KD 2%.  
 **Likely shift**: high mobilisation amplification for V/MP.
 
-## Segment-motion mobilisation matrix
+### Segment-motion mobilisation matrix
 
 | Segment | Drivmedel | Utvisning | Prop 216 | Krigsmateriel | Ersättning | Cyber |
 |---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
@@ -1844,7 +1809,7 @@ Maps motions to Swedish voter segments. Based on publicly available SCB demograp
 | E Pensioners | Low | Med | **High** | Low | **High** | Low |
 | F Civil-society | Low | **High** | Low | **High** | Low | Low |
 
-## Communication channel map
+### Communication channel map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -1863,7 +1828,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style C_motion fill:#009933,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Implications for campaign strategy
+### Implications for campaign strategy
 
 1. **S** should frame drivmedel motion for A+E (rural + pensioner) — combined 40% of electorate.
 2. **V** should frame utvisning motion for D+F (young + civil-society) — combined 20% but high-activism multiplier.
@@ -1875,35 +1840,34 @@ flowchart LR
 *Voter segment sizes are published SCB demographic approximations. Issue salience is reported Novus/Demoskop data. No individual voter targeting — aggregate segments only.*
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md -->
 
 Comparator jurisdictions for the Swedish motion wave. Three comparators: **Denmark**, **Germany**, **United Kingdom**. Purpose: triangulate how equivalent opposition behaviour plays out under different parliamentary systems.
 
-## Comparators
+### Comparators
 
-### 1. Denmark — Folketing motion culture
+#### 1. Denmark — Folketing motion culture
 **System**: Unicameral, minority governments norm, "parliamentarism".
 **Relevant pattern**: Opposition files "beslutningsforslag" (B) motions prolifically — norm rather than signal. 
 **Analogue to SWE 2026-04-24**: Danish opposition similarly fragmented S/SF/EL on fiscal questions; government routinely negotiates per-bill deals ("forligspolitik") unavailable in Swedish Tidö context.
 **Difference**: Denmark's tradition of broad cross-bloc "forlig" dampens motion-wave impact; Sweden's Tidö agreement locks support pre-vote, reducing motion leverage.
 **Source**: [ft.dk](https://www.ft.dk/), Danish research "Forhandlingspolitik og fragmenterede majoriteter" (Christiansen, Pedersen).
 
-### 2. Germany — Bundestag opposition motions
+#### 2. Germany — Bundestag opposition motions
 **System**: Federal bicameral, coalition government norm, constitutional review.
 **Relevant pattern**: SPD/Grüne/FDP Ampel (2021-2024) faced CDU/CSU + AfD + Linke opposition; opposition "Anträge" often parallel, rarely co-signed across bloc.
 **Analogue**: German opposition fragmentation on Heizungsgesetz (2023) mirrors Swedish fragmentation on drivmedel 2026 — three opposition parties, three parallel tracks.
 **Difference**: Bundesrat (Länder chamber) adds veto point absent in Swedish system; Swedish Regering faces only Riksdag floor.
 **Source**: [bundestag.de](https://www.bundestag.de/).
 
-### 3. United Kingdom — Commons opposition
+#### 3. United Kingdom — Commons opposition
 **System**: Westminster unitary, single-party majorities common.
 **Relevant pattern**: HoC opposition amendments on government bills; Labour 2019–2024 in opposition filed reasoned amendments on Conservative migration legislation (Illegal Migration Act 2023, Rwanda Act 2024).
 **Analogue**: Labour reasoned amendments on Rwanda scheme structurally similar to V/MP avslag on Swedish [HD024090](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html).
 **Difference**: First-past-the-post produces single-axis opposition; PR produces multi-axis (fiscal/defence/migration) as seen 2026-04-24.
 **Source**: [parliament.uk](https://www.parliament.uk/).
 
-## Comparative matrix
+### Comparative matrix
 
 | Dimension | Sweden 2026-04-24 | Denmark | Germany | UK |
 |-----------|-------------------|---------|---------|-----|
@@ -1914,18 +1878,18 @@ Comparator jurisdictions for the Swedish motion wave. Three comparators: **Denma
 | Ethical vapenexport precedent | MP HD024096 | 2015 Bahrain debate | Saudi arms freeze 2018 | Rwanda scheme 2023 |
 | Migration opposition framing | Rättssäkerhet (V/MP) | Folkeoplysning (EL) | Verfassungsmäßigkeit (Linke) | Human rights (Labour) |
 
-## Key insight
+### Key insight
 
 **PR + formal coalition agreement is unusually rigid**. The comparator jurisdictions show that opposition motion waves in minority/coalition systems typically produce either forlig (Denmark) or per-bill coalition flexibility (Germany Ampel). Tidö's formal written agreement + SD's coalition discipline produces less flexibility than comparable regimes — which means 2026-04-24 motions likely have **less** impact than opposition-motion density would predict.
 
-## Implications
+### Implications
 
 1. Swedish opposition cannot replicate Danish forligspolitik because Tidö-avtal precludes bilateral bill-by-bill deals.
 2. German Bundesrat-style veto point absent — no fallback forum for opposition.
 3. UK-style single-bill reasoned amendments more impactful per unit effort than Swedish multi-axis motions.
 4. Election-cycle effect (SE 2026) more determinative of motion impact than parliamentary math.
 
-## Cross-national lessons for Swedish opposition
+### Cross-national lessons for Swedish opposition
 
 - **S** (take Denmark's book): Build durable fiscal-anchor narrative that survives one election cycle; don't expect per-motion wins.
 - **V** (take Germany's book): Build extra-parliamentary pressure (civil society + media) to amplify motions.
@@ -1937,12 +1901,11 @@ Comparator jurisdictions for the Swedish motion wave. Three comparators: **Denma
 *Comparator data sourced from public parliamentary archives. No classified or private sources.*
 
 ## Historical Parallels
-
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md)_
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md -->
 
 Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identifies five relevant parallels.
 
-## Parallel 1 — 2014 spring motion wave vs. Alliansregeringen
+### Parallel 1 — 2014 spring motion wave vs. Alliansregeringen
 
 **Period**: March–May 2014.  
 **Context**: Alliansregeringen (M+FP+C+KD) minority government with Tidö-analogous support from opposition Ds on migration.  
@@ -1951,7 +1914,7 @@ Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identif
 **Lesson**: Bill passage ≠ electoral success; motion content shapes campaign.  
 **Source**: Riksdagen archives, [riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/).
 
-## Parallel 2 — 2018 fuel price / drivmedel politisk debate
+### Parallel 2 — 2018 fuel price / drivmedel politisk debate
 
 **Period**: 2018 pre-election.  
 **Context**: SD mobilised around drivmedel prices against Löfven-S regering.  
@@ -1959,7 +1922,7 @@ Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identif
 **Outcome**: SD grew from 12.9% (2014) to 17.5% (2018) on rural fiscal grievance.  
 **Lesson**: Drivmedel is recurring Swedish politicum with measurable electoral traction.
 
-## Parallel 3 — 2015–2016 utvisning / asylum policy shift
+### Parallel 3 — 2015–2016 utvisning / asylum policy shift
 
 **Period**: Autumn 2015 → spring 2016.  
 **Context**: Löfven-S/MP regering shifted migration policy from "our hearts are wide open" to tougher controls.  
@@ -1967,7 +1930,7 @@ Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identif
 **Outcome**: S lost migration-liberal voters to V; gained some centre voters; net near zero.  
 **Lesson**: Migration hardening produces realignment without net shift; V gains at S expense.
 
-## Parallel 4 — 2022 krigsmateriel / vapenexport debate (pre-Nato application)
+### Parallel 4 — 2022 krigsmateriel / vapenexport debate (pre-Nato application)
 
 **Period**: March–May 2022.  
 **Context**: Post-invasion of Ukraine; Sweden's Nato application; MP split from S.  
@@ -1975,7 +1938,7 @@ Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identif
 **Outcome**: Swedish Nato accession 2024; MP's ethical critique absorbed into mainstream through qualified support.  
 **Lesson**: MP's ethical-defence framework has durability but limited single-election traction.
 
-## Parallel 5 — 1994 spring motion wave vs. Bildt regering
+### Parallel 5 — 1994 spring motion wave vs. Bildt regering
 
 **Period**: March–June 1994.  
 **Context**: Bildt (M) borgerlig minority government with Ny Demokrati support.  
@@ -1983,7 +1946,7 @@ Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identif
 **Outcome**: Carlsson (S) won 1994 election; Bildt out; ND vanished.  
 **Lesson**: Dependence on non-traditional support parties creates narrative fragility; motion wave amplifies this.
 
-## Historical motion-density baselines
+### Historical motion-density baselines
 
 | Year | Post-proposition-package window | Motions filed | Opposition parties |
 |-----:|--------------------------------|--------------:|---------------------|
@@ -1999,7 +1962,7 @@ Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identif
 
 **Context**: 2026-04-24 wave is within normal range but compressed into 3 days — pattern consistent with coordinated pre-election positioning.
 
-## Comparative table
+### Comparative table
 
 | Parallel | Regering | Tidö-analogue? | Election impact | Motion wave size |
 |----------|----------|:-------:|:---------------:|:----------------:|
@@ -2009,7 +1972,7 @@ Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identif
 | 2022 Andersson | S | No | Regering fell | Large |
 | **2026 Kristersson** | **M+KD+L+SD support** | **Yes** | **TBD 2026-09-13** | **Medium** |
 
-## Timeline
+### Timeline
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -2022,7 +1985,7 @@ timeline
     2026 : Kristersson regering — TBD
 ```
 
-## Judgments from historical pattern
+### Judgments from historical pattern
 
 1. Every spring motion wave before a Swedish election since 1994 has preceded a regering change.
 2. This is **not a universal rule** — but baseline probability of regering change in 2026-09 is ≥ 50% per pattern-base rate.
@@ -2035,14 +1998,13 @@ timeline
 *Historical data from [Riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/) archives and [SCB election tables](https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/demokrati/allmanna-val/). No forecasting claim; pattern base-rate only.*
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
-
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md)_
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
 Assesses the implementation feasibility of the 9 Tidö bills **if passed**, independent of political outcome. Focus: administrative, fiscal, legal, and temporal realism.
 
-## Per-bill feasibility
+### Per-bill feasibility
 
-### Prop 214 — Cybersäkerhet reform
+#### Prop 214 — Cybersäkerhet reform
 **Administrative**: Requires MSB capacity expansion; coordination with PTS (Post- och telestyrelsen).  
 **Fiscal**: ~500 MSEK/year ramp-up; within budget feasibility.  
 **Legal**: Compatible with NIS2 directive; implementation 12–18 months.  
@@ -2050,14 +2012,14 @@ Assesses the implementation feasibility of the 9 Tidö bills **if passed**, inde
 **Evidence**: C motion [HD024095](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html) flags implementation risk.  
 **Feasibility score**: **Medium**.
 
-### Prop 215 — Tidsbegränsat boende
+#### Prop 215 — Tidsbegränsat boende
 **Administrative**: Migrationsverket + kommunal samordning.  
 **Fiscal**: Neutral to slight saving.  
 **Legal**: ECHR Art. 8 (family life) compatibility concerns flagged by C [HD024093](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html).  
 **Blockers**: Legal challenge risk; Migrationsdomstol caseload.  
 **Feasibility score**: **Low-Medium**.
 
-### Prop 216 — Medicinsk kompetens reform
+#### Prop 216 — Medicinsk kompetens reform
 **Administrative**: Major — SKR kommunsektor engagement required; legitimationsprocess ändras.  
 **Fiscal**: Kommunsektor-kostnad unclear; 4-party motion wave flags finansiering.  
 **Legal**: EU-direktiv (2005/36/EC) compatibility must be verified.  
@@ -2065,35 +2027,35 @@ Assesses the implementation feasibility of the 9 Tidö bills **if passed**, inde
 **Evidence**: All 4 opposition parties flag implementation concerns.  
 **Feasibility score**: **Low** — highest implementation risk in wave.
 
-### Prop 222 — Ersättningsregler
+#### Prop 222 — Ersättningsregler
 **Administrative**: Försäkringskassan IT-system update; moderate.  
 **Fiscal**: Neutral.  
 **Legal**: Väl avgränsat; minimal risk.  
 **Blockers**: IT-modernisering timeline.  
 **Feasibility score**: **Medium-High**.
 
-### Prop 223 — Konsumentkredit
+#### Prop 223 — Konsumentkredit
 **Administrative**: Finansinspektionen + Konsumentverket tillsyn.  
 **Fiscal**: Neutral.  
 **Legal**: Kompatibel med EU-direktiv 2008/48/EC som uppdaterat 2023/2225.  
 **Blockers**: Kreditgivare-anpassning 6–12 mån.  
 **Feasibility score**: **High**.
 
-### Prop 228 — Krigsmateriel
+#### Prop 228 — Krigsmateriel
 **Administrative**: ISP (Inspektionen för strategiska produkter) capacity.  
 **Fiscal**: ISP-budget ~50 MSEK/år sufficient.  
 **Legal**: Kompatibel med EU-gemensam ståndpunkt 2008/944/CFSP.  
 **Blockers**: MP-motion [HD024096](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html) framework would add review burden.  
 **Feasibility score**: **High** as drafted; **Medium** if MP framework adopted.
 
-### Prop 229 — Mottagandelag
+#### Prop 229 — Mottagandelag
 **Administrative**: Migrationsverket + kommunal mottagandekapacitet.  
 **Fiscal**: Kommunal ersättningssystem ändringar; ~800 MSEK omfördelning.  
 **Legal**: Dublin III / CEAS compatibility.  
 **Blockers**: Kommunal opposition; C motion [HD024089](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html) flags kommun ersättning.  
 **Feasibility score**: **Medium-Low**.
 
-### Prop 235 — Utvisning
+#### Prop 235 — Utvisning
 **Administrative**: Migrationsverket + Migrationsdomstolar + Polisen.  
 **Fiscal**: Migrationsverket + Polisen kapacitet ~1.5 mdkr ramp.  
 **Legal**: ECHR Art. 3 + 8 + EU return directive (2008/115/EC) compliance non-trivial.  
@@ -2101,14 +2063,14 @@ Assesses the implementation feasibility of the 9 Tidö bills **if passed**, inde
 **Evidence**: V/MP motions flag rättssäkerhet concerns.  
 **Feasibility score**: **Low-Medium**.
 
-### Prop 236 — Drivmedel (ändringsbudget)
+#### Prop 236 — Drivmedel (ändringsbudget)
 **Administrative**: Skatteverket systemändring enkel; ~3 månader.  
 **Fiscal**: ~2.5 mdkr statsbudgetkostnad; S motion [HD024082](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html) begär finansiering.  
 **Legal**: EU energiskattedirektiv (2003/96/EC) golvnivå måste hållas.  
 **Blockers**: Extra ändringsbudget procedur — FiU majoritetsmust hållas.  
 **Feasibility score**: **High administrativt**; **Medium politiskt** (extra procedur).
 
-## Feasibility matrix
+### Feasibility matrix
 
 | Bill | Admin | Fiscal | Legal | Temporal | Overall |
 |------|:-----:|:------:|:-----:|:--------:|:-------:|
@@ -2122,7 +2084,7 @@ Assesses the implementation feasibility of the 9 Tidö bills **if passed**, inde
 | 235 utvisning | Low-Med | Med | Low | Low | **Low-Medium** |
 | 236 drivmedel | High | Med | Med | High | **High** procedural risk |
 
-## Cross-bill dependencies
+### Cross-bill dependencies
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -2141,7 +2103,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style 236 fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Judgments
+### Judgments
 
 1. **Prop 216** is the highest implementation-risk bill; motion wave correctly identifies weakest link.
 2. **Prop 235 + 229** combined create kommunal kapacitet stress.
@@ -2149,7 +2111,7 @@ flowchart LR
 4. **Prop 214 + 223 + 228** är relativt oproblematiska administrativt.
 5. Opposition-motioner fokuserar — korrekt — på de bilar med reell implementationsrisk (216, 229, 235, 236).
 
-## Implementation timeline
+### Implementation timeline
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -2175,14 +2137,13 @@ gantt
 *Implementation feasibility is independent of political feasibility. Sources: [regeringen.se](https://www.regeringen.se/), [riksdagen.se](https://www.riksdagen.se/), [ec.europa.eu](https://ec.europa.eu/) for EU directive references.*
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses). Purpose: ensure the dominant narrative is not adopted by default.
 
-## Hypothesis ledger
+### Hypothesis ledger
 
-### H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthesis claims)
+#### H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthesis claims)
 **Statement**: The 20-motion wave reveals coordinated opposition resistance to Tidö's legislative package; SD silence amplifies Tidö discipline; motions shape 2026 election cycle.
 
 **Evidence for**:
@@ -2197,7 +2158,7 @@ Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH 
 
 **Confidence**: Moderate (Admiralty B3)
 
-### H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis
+#### H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis
 **Statement**: This motion wave is routine parliamentary procedure; the 20-motion count is statistically within normal post-proposition activity and has no predictive value for 2026.
 
 **Evidence for**:
@@ -2212,7 +2173,7 @@ Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH 
 
 **Confidence**: Moderate (Admiralty B3)
 
-### H3 — Contrarian hypothesis (Tidö is the vulnerable party)
+#### H3 — Contrarian hypothesis (Tidö is the vulnerable party)
 **Statement**: The real political story is not opposition coordination but Tidö fragility — the need for 9 bills in a single wave is itself a signal of rushed implementation pre-election, and SD silence is preparation to claim credit if bills pass or to break away if they fail.
 
 **Evidence for**:
@@ -2227,7 +2188,7 @@ Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH 
 
 **Confidence**: Low-Moderate (C3)
 
-### H4 — Economic-determinist hypothesis
+#### H4 — Economic-determinist hypothesis
 **Statement**: Fuel-price politics (prop 236 / HD024082 / HD024092 / HD024098) dominates everything; migration/defence/welfare motions are noise around the real axis of rural-urban fiscal conflict, already mediated by SCB KPI data and ECB rate cycle.
 
 **Evidence for**:
@@ -2242,7 +2203,7 @@ Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH 
 
 **Confidence**: Low (C4)
 
-## ACH matrix (consistency scoring)
+### ACH matrix (consistency scoring)
 
 | Evidence | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 |
 |----------|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|
@@ -2258,13 +2219,13 @@ Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH 
 
 **Reading**: + = consistent, − = inconsistent, 0 = neutral. H1 is best-supported but not decisively. H2 is plausible null; analyst should not over-claim.
 
-## Key uncertainties
+### Key uncertainties
 
 1. Is 20 motions statistically above baseline? (Answer requires multi-year motion-density dataset — flagged for ingest in [methodology-reflection.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md).)
 2. Will SD break silence if any Tidö bill fails? (Watch: public statements next 30 days.)
 3. Will SKR formally object to prop 216? (Direct validator for H1 vs H2.)
 
-## Red-team recommendations
+### Red-team recommendations
 
 - **Add**: motion-density baseline from Riksdagen archives 2018–2025 before next run.
 - **Add**: SCB public-opinion data on drivmedel and migration salience.
@@ -2276,12 +2237,11 @@ Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH 
 *Structured challenge does not reject the lead synthesis but recommends hedging on confidence where evidence is thin. All dok_id citations are verifiable at [data.riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/).*
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md -->
 
 Seven-dimension classification per document. Dimensions: **Policy Area**, **Process Stage**, **Partisan Axis**, **Electoral Salience**, **Legal Intensity**, **Fiscal Impact**, **Distributional Effect**.
 
-## Per-document classification
+### Per-document classification
 
 | dok_id | Policy Area | Stage | Partisan Axis | Elect Salience | Legal | Fiscal | Distributional | Priority | Retention | Access |
 |--------|-------------|-------|---------------|----------------|-------|--------|----------------|----------|-----------|--------|
@@ -2306,7 +2266,7 @@ Seven-dimension classification per document. Dimensions: **Policy Area**, **Proc
 | [HD024093](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html) | Defence/cyber | Counter-motion | Centre vs Tidö | Low | Moderate | Low | Neutral | **P3** | Permanent | Public |
 | [HD024088](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html) | Consumer finance | Counter-motion | Centre vs Tidö | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Progressive | **P3** | Permanent | Public |
 
-## Priority tier distribution
+### Priority tier distribution
 
 | Tier | Count | Share | Response |
 |------|------:|------:|----------|
@@ -2315,11 +2275,11 @@ Seven-dimension classification per document. Dimensions: **Policy Area**, **Proc
 | P2 (medium) | 9 | 45% | Cluster analysis |
 | P3 (routine) | 6 | 30% | Briefly noted in table |
 
-## Retention & access
+### Retention & access
 
 All 20 documents are **Offentliga handlingar** (public documents) under Offentlighetsprincipen. Retention: permanent (Riksdagsdata long-term archive). Access control: none required. GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) — data manifestly made public by data subjects (MPs acting in official capacity). No special-category masking required.
 
-## Mermaid — classification heat map
+### Mermaid — classification heat map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -2369,12 +2329,11 @@ flowchart LR
 *Classification cross-validated against significance-scoring.md DIW tiers (L3 ↔ P0, L2+ ↔ P1, L2 ↔ P2, L1 ↔ P3).*
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 Maps policy clusters, legislative chains, opposition coordination patterns across 20 motions.
 
-## Policy cluster graph
+### Policy cluster graph
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -2418,7 +2377,7 @@ flowchart TB
     style Civil fill:#3a86ff,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
 ```
 
-## Legislative chain
+### Legislative chain
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
@@ -2437,7 +2396,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style Law fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Opposition coordination matrix
+### Opposition coordination matrix
 
 | Cluster | S | V | MP | C | Coordination pattern |
 |---------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|----------------------|
@@ -2451,19 +2410,19 @@ flowchart LR
 | Konsumentkredit (223) |  | ✓ |  | ✓ | Two-party |
 | Cybersäk (214) |  |  | ✓ | ✓ | Two-party |
 
-## Issue-linkage network
+### Issue-linkage network
 
 - **Drivmedel ↔ migration**: V explicitly frames both as distributional questions (HD024092 + HD024090). Rhetorical thread: "who pays".
 - **Krigsmateriel ↔ cyber**: MP links defence-industry scrutiny to civil cyber resilience (HD024096 + HD024085).
 - **Medicinsk kompetens ↔ mottagandelag**: C links healthcare workforce to migration system capacity (HD024094 + HD024089).
 - **Utvisning ↔ tidsbeg boende**: Both migration-regime bills; C on one, V/MP/S on the other — divergent issue selection among opposition.
 
-## Historical precedents (same-day cross-ref)
+### Historical precedents (same-day cross-ref)
 
 - 2026-04-23 motions cluster (see [`../2026-04-23/motions/`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/)) — previous day's motion wave preceded this one; check continuity.
 - 2026-04-18 propositions cluster — originating Tidö legislative package.
 
-## External links
+### External links
 
 - Riksdagen open data: [data.riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/)
 - All dok_ids resolvable at `https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html`
@@ -2474,10 +2433,9 @@ flowchart LR
 *Cross-reference map generated from 20 motion manifest. Verifiable via `search_dokument` on any dok_id.*
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md)_
-
-## §ICD 203 audit
+### §ICD 203 audit
 
 Checklist against the ICD 203 nine standards:
 
@@ -2493,7 +2451,7 @@ Checklist against the ICD 203 nine standards:
 | 8 | Distinguishes intelligence from assumptions | ✓ | Key assumptions flagged (e.g. baseline motion density unknown) |
 | 9 | Incorporates alternative analysis | ✓ | [devils-advocate.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md) H2/H3/H4 considered |
 
-## Structured analytic techniques (SAT) attestation
+### Structured analytic techniques (SAT) attestation
 
 At least 10 SATs applied to this run:
 
@@ -2510,7 +2468,7 @@ At least 10 SATs applied to this run:
 11. **Bayesian posterior estimation** — [risk-assessment.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md)
 12. **Decision-tree modelling** — [scenario-analysis.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md)
 
-## Admiralty Code source rating (WEP / Kent Scale reconciled)
+### Admiralty Code source rating (WEP / Kent Scale reconciled)
 
 | Source | Reliability | Credibility | Combined | Note |
 |--------|:-----------:|:-----------:|:--------:|------|
@@ -2521,7 +2479,7 @@ At least 10 SATs applied to this run:
 | Historical parliamentary archives (inferred baselines) | C | 3 | C3 | Fairly reliable, possibly true |
 | Expert commentary (not used as primary evidence) | C | 4 | C4 | — |
 
-## Data quality & gaps
+### Data quality & gaps
 
 **Present**:
 - 20 verified dok_ids, full metadata per [data-download-manifest.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md)
@@ -2536,8 +2494,7 @@ At least 10 SATs applied to this run:
 5. **Cross-border comparators** — Danish/German/UK equivalents described but not quantified on motion-density metric.
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Workflow**: news-motions
 **Run ID**: 24866827737
@@ -2548,7 +2505,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 > **Lookback used**: The current riksmöte 2025/26 motion window for counter-motions to government propositions peaked 2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17 (motion deadline following prop tabling). 2026-04-24 is a procedural day; the most recent 20 motions below form today's analytical corpus per §3 lookback policy.
 
-## Per-document inventory (20 motions)
+### Per-document inventory (20 motions)
 
 | # | dok_id | Datum | Organ | Party | Responds to | Title (short) | Full text |
 |--:|--------|-------|-------|-------|-------------|---------------|-----------|
@@ -2573,17 +2530,17 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | 19 | HD024089 | 2026-04-15 | SfU | C | prop 2025/26:229 | En ny mottagandelag | metadata-only |
 | 20 | HD024087 | 2026-04-15 | SfU | MP | prop 2025/26:229 | En ny mottagandelag — avslag | metadata-only |
 
-## Source URLs (primary)
+### Source URLs (primary)
 
 All accessible at `https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html`. Example: <https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html>.
 
-## MCP server availability notes
+### MCP server availability notes
 
 - `get_sync_status`: live (2026-04-24T01:05:50Z)
 - `get_motioner`: successful on first call, 20 records retrieved
 - No retries required. No partial failures.
 
-## Cluster summary
+### Cluster summary
 
 | Cluster | Responds to | Parties | Count |
 |---------|-------------|---------|------:|
@@ -2602,3 +2559,51 @@ All accessible at `https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html`. Example: <
 ---
 
 *Author: James Pether Sörling · Generated via riksdag-regering MCP*
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024078-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024079-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024080-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024081-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024082-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024083-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024084-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024085-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024086-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024087-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024088-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024089-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024090-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024091-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024092-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024093-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024094-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024095-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024096-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024097-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD024098-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/article.md
index cdb969f909..02d6dddd0e 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-24
 subfolder: propositions
 slug: 2026-04-24-propositions
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T11:09:59.950Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.745Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,10 +26,9 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 On 23 April 2026 the Kristersson government (Tidö coalition — M, KD, L + SD confidence partner) tabled **4 parliamentary documents** dominated by two strategic priorities: (1) **EU-driven financial regulation** with Prop. 2025/26:253 (EU Banking Package, CRR3/CRD6 transposition — Admiralty B2) and (2) **Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation** with Prop. 2025/26:252 (benefit restrictions for detainees). A debt-management evaluation skrivelse (Skr. 2025/26:104) and a tachograph-enforcement bill (Prop. 2025/26:256) complete the batch. The highest-weight item (Prop. 2025/26:253, DIW **3.8**) is systemic — it reshapes capital requirements for Sweden's four systemically-important banks ahead of Riksbanken's next rate decision.
 
@@ -50,13 +49,13 @@ flowchart LR
     style C2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
 ```
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Financial-markets desk**: Brief clients on Prop. 2025/26:253 capital-floor impact for Handelsbanken/SEB IRB books ahead of Q2 earnings. **Trigger**: Riksbanken MPC comment at next meeting. Confidence: **HIGH**.
 2. **Civil-society / legal**: Prepare Advokatsamfundet remiss challenge to Prop. 2025/26:252 proportionality (Art. 9 GDPR special-category data in benefits assessment; ECHR Art. 8 privacy). **Trigger**: SfU committee referral opens. Confidence: **MEDIUM**.
 3. **Political-risk desk**: Monitor V/S/MP pushback framing on Prop. 2025/26:252 as "punishment of poverty" — potential coalition-cohesion test for Tidö parties (L historically more reluctant on punitive social-policy). Confidence: **MEDIUM**.
 
-## 60-second read
+### 60-second read
 
 - **Most significant**: Prop. 2025/26:253 — EU bankpaket (DIW 3.8, Admiralty B2). Transposes CRR3/CRD6; raises RWA floors for big-4 Swedish banks.
 - **Most controversial**: Prop. 2025/26:252 — benefit restrictions for detainees (DIW 3.5). Civil-liberty flashpoint.
@@ -64,11 +63,11 @@ flowchart LR
 - **Most symbolic**: Skr. 2025/26:104 — 5-year debt-management evaluation; fiscal-credibility signal into 2026 election cycle.
 - **Common thread**: All 4 signed by PM Kristersson; 2 by Finance Minister Wykman → Finansdepartementet carries 50% of the day's legislative load.
 
-## Top forward trigger (72 h)
+### Top forward trigger (72 h)
 
 🔴 **SfU committee referral for Prop. 2025/26:252** — if opposition (V, S, MP) coordinate on proportionality objections, this becomes the first Tidö criminal-justice bill to face unified opposition legal challenge in 2026.
 
-## Key decisions matrix
+### Key decisions matrix
 
 | Decision | Trigger | Horizon | Confidence |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -76,7 +75,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | Remiss challenge preparation | Prop. 2025/26:252 SfU referral | 1 week | MEDIUM |
 | Coalition-cohesion monitoring | L/KD divergence signal | 4–8 weeks | MEDIUM |
 
-## Risk summary
+### Risk summary
 
 - **Tier 1 (systemic)**: Prop. 2025/26:253 transposition delay → EU infringement exposure.
 - **Tier 2 (political)**: Prop. 2025/26:252 — ECHR/ECtHR-based rights challenge possible.
@@ -87,14 +86,13 @@ flowchart LR
 ---
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md)_
-
-## Lead story (decision-grade)
+### Lead story (decision-grade)
 
 > The Kristersson government's 23 April 2026 proposition bundle combines **EU-mandated financial regulation** (HD03253 — EU Banking Package) with **Tidö-era criminal-justice operationalisation** (HD03252 — detainee benefit restrictions), positioning both for summer-session enactment. The package signals a government pivoting from "new laws" to "implementation mode" roughly 16 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election.
 
-## DIW-weighted ranking
+### DIW-weighted ranking
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title | DIW | Tier | Rationale |
 |:-:|---|---|:-:|---|---|
@@ -122,7 +120,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style CJ fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
 ```
 
-## Integrated intelligence picture
+### Integrated intelligence picture
 
 **Thematic convergence**: Two propositions (HD03252, HD03256) expand **state coercive authority** (benefit restriction, search powers); two (HD03253, HD03104) **institutionalise financial governance**. This is the profile of a government preparing its **election legacy**: "We delivered financial stability + public order." Whether the Riksdag will enact all four before the summer recess (late June) depends on FiU and SfU committee bandwidth.
 
@@ -130,20 +128,20 @@ flowchart TD
 
 **Coalition load-bearing**: All 4 documents signed by PM Kristersson. Ministerial diversity: Wykman (M, finance ×2), Strömmer (M, justice), Carlson (KD, infra). L gets no lead ministry role in today's batch — **consistent with L's reduced legislative footprint since the 2024–25 coalition strain over criminal-justice proportionality**.
 
-## AI-recommended article metadata
+### AI-recommended article metadata
 
 - **EN headline (72 chars)**: "Kristersson's pivot: EU bank rules, detainee benefits, truck-fraud law"
 - **SV headline (75 chars)**: "Kristerssons växel: EU-bankregler, häktesförmåner och färdskrivarlag"
 - **EN meta description (158 chars)**: "Four government bills signed 23 April 2026 reshape Sweden's banking capital rules, restrict detainee benefits, target tachograph fraud, and evaluate debt mgmt."
 - **Primary keywords**: EU banking package, Basel III endgame, säkerhetsförvaring, kontrollerat boende, färdskrivare, Tidö-avtalet, Niklas Wykman, Ulf Kristersson.
 
-## Cross-type signals
+### Cross-type signals
 
 - **With motions pipeline**: Opposition motions on HD03252 expected within 15-day deadline (by ~8 May 2026).
 - **With committee-reports pipeline**: FiU will need to report HD03253 ahead of summer recess (~20 June).
 - **With interpellations**: V/S likely to file on HD03252 proportionality; KD to support HD03256.
 
-## Confidence & uncertainty
+### Confidence & uncertainty
 
 - **HIGH**: Document identity, authors, effective dates (A1 primary-source).
 - **MEDIUM**: Enactment probability (depends on party whip behaviour — see `coalition-mathematics.md`).
@@ -152,16 +150,15 @@ flowchart TD
 ---
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Audience**: Decision-makers in financial markets, political risk, civil society.
 **Classification**: Public OSINT.
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling.
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1) — HIGH confidence
+#### Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1) — HIGH confidence
 
 **Judgment**: The Kristersson government has transitioned from "new policy" to "implementation mode" 16 months ahead of the September 2026 Riksdag election, as evidenced by 2 bills in today's batch carrying hard pre-election effective dates.
 
@@ -169,7 +166,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 **Confidence**: **HIGH** (multiple corroborating documents; Admiralty B2).
 
-### Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2) — HIGH confidence
+#### Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2) — HIGH confidence
 
 **Judgment**: [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) (EU Banking Package transposition) is the single most consequential document in today's batch for Sweden's financial sector, reshaping capital requirements for the 4 systemically-important banks (Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea).
 
@@ -177,7 +174,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 **Confidence**: **HIGH**.
 
-### Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3) — MEDIUM confidence
+#### Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3) — MEDIUM confidence
 
 **Judgment**: [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) is the politically highest-risk document of the batch. Probability of material amendment during committee stage is **~25%** (P2 scenario — see `scenario-analysis.md`).
 
@@ -185,7 +182,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 **Confidence**: **MEDIUM** (single-source dependency on document text; opposition positioning not yet public).
 
-### Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4) — MEDIUM confidence
+#### Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4) — MEDIUM confidence
 
 **Judgment**: Sweden faces an EU Commission infringement-risk window of ~90 days on late CRR3 transposition (scenario S3, probability 20%).
 
@@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 **Confidence**: **MEDIUM**.
 
-### Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5) — LOW confidence
+#### Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5) — LOW confidence
 
 **Judgment**: Coalition cohesion will hold on all 4 votes, including [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html).
 
@@ -201,7 +198,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 
 **Confidence**: **LOW** — single precedent class, future behaviour contingent on whip calibration. See `coalition-mathematics.md`.
 
-## Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for next cycle
+### Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for next cycle
 
 - **PIR-1**: FiU committee referral decisions on [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) — publication of hearing list (expected within 2 weeks).
 - **PIR-2**: SfU committee referral + remiss summary on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) — flag any dissenting remissinstans position from Advokatsamfundet, Barnombudsmannen, or JO.
@@ -211,7 +208,7 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 - **PIR-6**: Lagrådet yttrande text — deep-read for proportionality specifics on HD03252.
 - **PIR-7**: Försäkringskassan IT readiness statement for 1 Aug 2026 cut-over.
 
-## Key Assumptions Check
+### Key Assumptions Check
 
 | Assumption | Evidence base | If wrong, then … |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -220,19 +217,18 @@ _Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonito
 | Lagrådet critique is mild | Bilaga 5 of [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) (not yet parsed) | Scenario S2 probability rises |
 | Försäkringskassan can deliver IT in 3 months | §7 konsekvenser of [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) | Effective date slips |
 
-## Intelligence gaps
+### Intelligence gaps
 
 - No SCB data on current incarcerated-persons benefits baseline (would improve KJ-3 confidence).
 - No Riksbanken statement on CRR3 interaction with monetary policy.
 - No internal party-group position statements yet.
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Framework**: Decision-Informational-Weighting (DIW) per `ai-driven-analysis-guide.md` §DIW. Scores on 0–5 scale.
 
-## Scoring table (ranked)
+### Scoring table (ranked)
 
 | Rank | dok_id | D (Decision impact) | I (Information novelty) | W (Wider salience) | **DIW** | Tier | Primary evidence |
 |:-:|---|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|---|---|
@@ -254,22 +250,21 @@ flowchart LR
     style R4 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
 ```
 
-## Sensitivity analysis
+### Sensitivity analysis
 
 - If **HD03253's** RWA-floor impact turns out bigger than QIS (> 8% CET1 hit on Handelsbanken), score rises to **4.3** (L3 Intelligence-grade). **Trigger indicator**: Finansinspektionen QIS publication, expected Q3 2026.
 - If **HD03252** triggers Lagrådet second opinion on proportionality, score rises to **4.0**. **Trigger**: Lagrådet yttrande already exists per Bilaga 5 of the proposition — scope for Pass-2 deep-read (HD03252 text page ~49).
 - If **HD03256** enforcement provokes union response (Transportarbetareförbundet), political salience multiplies.
 - If **HD03104** evaluation attracts IMF Article IV citation, external-credibility weight rises.
 
-## Anti-fabrication check
+### Anti-fabrication check
 
 Every ranked item cites its `dok_id` and resolvable URL on riksdagen.se. No claim in this table is unevidenced. Sources diversity is **single-channel** (Riksdagen API only) — flagged for Pass-2 enrichment with SCB / Riksbanken / Finansinspektionen statements in a later aggregation run.
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md)_
-
-## Per-party framing (predicted)
+### Per-party framing (predicted)
 
 | Party | HD03252 frame | HD03253 frame | HD03256 frame |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -282,7 +277,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | MP | "Rights erosion — where is proportionality?" | neutral | "Good intent, but oversight?" |
 | C | Split — business-friendly on HD03256; cautious on HD03252 | Small-bank proportionality concerns | Support |
 
-## Press-quadrant framing (predicted)
+### Press-quadrant framing (predicted)
 
 | Quadrant | Expected frame on HD03252 |
 |---|---|
@@ -291,26 +286,25 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Centre-left (Aftonbladet ledarsida) | Critical — "justice, not punishment" |
 | Left-of-centre (ETC, Flamman) | Strongly critical |
 
-## Platform framing (predicted)
+### Platform framing (predicted)
 
 - **X / Twitter Sweden**: Polarised — M/KD/SD supporters amplify "fair consequence"; V/MP amplify "rights erosion". [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) gets low engagement (technical).
 - **TV4 / SVT news**: Framing as bundle — expect 2-minute explainer on all four bills (high production), 15-minute Agenda segment on HD03252 alone.
 - **Podcasts (Aftonbladet Ledaren, DN Åsikt)**: HD03252 deep-dive likely within 7 days.
 
-## Longitudinal frame record entry
+### Longitudinal frame record entry
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-24. **Bundle**: HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104. **Dominant elite frame**: "government delivers on Tidö-avtalet". **Dominant critical frame**: "proportionality question on HD03252". **Next inflection point**: SfU committee hearing schedule publication.
 
-## Cross-reference
+### Cross-reference
 All framings are predictive, based on 2023–2025 editorial pattern observation. Empirical confirmation awaits Day+1 to Day+7 media capture — recommended follow-up in `evening-analysis` or `weekly-review` workflow.
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 Per `analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md` — lenses: Government, Opposition, Institutions, Affected citizens, Economic actors, International.
 
-## Matrix
+### Matrix
 
 | Lens | Actor | Position on bundle | Key document | Leverage |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -337,7 +331,7 @@ Per `analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md` — lenses: Government, Oppositio
 | International | EU Commission | Expects prompt CRR3 transposition | [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) | Infringement procedure |
 | International | IMF Article IV | Will reference HD03104 evaluation | [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) | External credibility |
 
-## Influence network
+### Influence network
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -362,7 +356,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style IM fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
 ```
 
-## Winners / losers summary
+### Winners / losers summary
 
 | Bill | Winners | Losers |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -372,31 +366,30 @@ flowchart LR
 | HD03104 | Finansdep. narrative; Riksgälden validation | Opposition critique bandwidth |
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Horizons**: 72 h / 1 week / 1 month / Election (Sep 2026).
 
-## 72-hour window (by 2026-04-27)
+### 72-hour window (by 2026-04-27)
 
 1. **2026-04-24 to 2026-04-27** — Opposition party-group first statements on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) (V, MP, S coordination signal).
 2. **2026-04-25** — Swedish financial press (DI, Affärsvärlden) commentary on [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) RWA impact.
 3. **+72h** — SvD and DN ledarsida editorials on bundle.
 
-## 1-week window (by 2026-05-01)
+### 1-week window (by 2026-05-01)
 
 4. **2026-04-28 to 2026-05-01** — Committee referral decisions (FiU for [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html), SfU for [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html), TU for [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html)).
 5. **2026-05-01** — Advokatsamfundet position statement on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) proportionality.
 6. **+1 week** — Bankföreningen public comment on CRR3 output-floor ([HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html)).
 
-## 1-month window (by 2026-05-24)
+### 1-month window (by 2026-05-24)
 
 7. **2026-05-08** — Opposition motion-filing deadline (15 days) on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html).
 8. **2026-05-15** — First FiU hearing on [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) (typical timetable).
 9. **2026-05-24** — Finansinspektionen QIS snapshot for CRR3.
 10. **2026-05-30** — Försäkringskassan IT readiness statement for [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) 1 Aug cut-over.
 
-## Election window (by 2026-09-13, election day)
+### Election window (by 2026-09-13, election day)
 
 11. **2026-06-15** — Kammaren vote on [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) (pre-recess target).
 12. **2026-06-20** — Kammaren vote on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) (or deferred post-recess if Scenario S2).
@@ -404,7 +397,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 14. **2026-08-01** — [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) effective date — election-year operational reality.
 15. **2026-09-13** — Riksdag election — retrospective scorecard on bundle delivery.
 
-## Indicator scoring dashboard
+### Indicator scoring dashboard
 
 ```mermaid
 timeline
@@ -423,35 +416,34 @@ timeline
         2026-09-13 : Election day
 ```
 
-## Anti-vagueness check
+### Anti-vagueness check
 
 All 15 indicators have an explicit date, source anchor, and evidenced mechanism. Admiralty codes B2-C3 depending on whether the indicator is scheduled (deterministic) vs. behavioural (probabilistic).
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Horizon**: Riksdag summer recess (June 2026) → September 2026 election → first post-election cycle.
 
-## Scenario 1 — "Clean enactment" (probability 45%)
+### Scenario 1 — "Clean enactment" (probability 45%)
 
 **Narrative**: All 4 bills enacted on schedule. HD03256 effective 1 July, HD03252 effective 1 August, HD03253 in force per EU timetable, HD03104 noted. Tidö framing succeeds: "law and order + sound money."
 
 **Leading indicator**: FiU committee report on [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) published without amendments by mid-June 2026.
 
-## Scenario 2 — "Lagrådet-forced redraft of HD03252" (probability 25%)
+### Scenario 2 — "Lagrådet-forced redraft of HD03252" (probability 25%)
 
 **Narrative**: Lagrådet yttrande critique on proportionality (visible in Bilaga 5 of [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html)) prompts SfU to amend. Effective date slips to 1 Oct 2026 — post-election. Electoral "delivered" message weakens.
 
 **Leading indicator**: SfU schedules ≥ 2 hearings with rights-focused remissinstanser in May 2026.
 
-## Scenario 3 — "EU infringement squeeze on HD03253" (probability 20%)
+### Scenario 3 — "EU infringement squeeze on HD03253" (probability 20%)
 
 **Narrative**: EU Commission issues reasoned opinion on late CRR3 transposition before Swedish enactment. Government accelerates FiU timetable. Industry consultation short-circuited → harsher-than-necessary output-floor calibration for Handelsbanken/SEB.
 
 **Leading indicator**: DG FISMA communication to Stockholm in May; press leak to Financial Times.
 
-## Scenario 4 — "Bundle dilution success" (probability 10%)
+### Scenario 4 — "Bundle dilution success" (probability 10%)
 
 **Narrative**: 4-bill bundle strategy works: media attention fragmented; opposition coordination fails. All enacted without significant amendment.
 
@@ -467,7 +459,7 @@ pie title Scenario probabilities
     "S4 Bundle dilution" : 10
 ```
 
-## Scenario-specific forward indicators
+### Scenario-specific forward indicators
 
 | Scenario | 72-h indicator | 1-week indicator | 1-month indicator |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -477,12 +469,11 @@ pie title Scenario probabilities
 | S4 | < 500 words press coverage | Opposition fragmented on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) | All 4 in summer recess schedule |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Framework**: per `analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md` — dimensions: Political, Institutional, Economic, Social/Rights, Operational.
 
-## Risk register
+### Risk register
 
 | # | Dimension | Risk | L (1–5) | I (1–5) | Score | dok_id anchor | Mitigation |
 |---|---|---|:-:|:-:|:-:|---|---|
@@ -497,7 +488,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R9 | Economic | Debt-management evaluation (HD03104) exposes opposition attack lines on pandemic-era borrowing | 2 | 2 | 4 | [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) | Government narrative preparation |
 | R10 | Social/Rights | Expanded search powers (HD03256) criticised by Advokatsamfundet | 2 | 2 | 4 | [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) | Proportionality safeguards in §5.2 |
 
-## Heat map (L × I)
+### Heat map (L × I)
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -520,12 +511,12 @@ quadrantChart
     "R10 Search-power critique": [0.35, 0.35]
 ```
 
-## Cascading chains
+### Cascading chains
 
 1. **R7 → R2 → R3 → R6**: Försäkringskassan IT slippage delays [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) implementation, opening the door for rights-based critique, enabling opposition motion, escalating to 2026 election attack.
 2. **R5 → R1**: Late CRR3 transposition → accelerated FiU timetable → insufficient industry consultation → harsher-than-necessary capital impact on Swedish banks.
 
-## Bayesian posterior notes
+### Bayesian posterior notes
 
 - **Prior (P(Tidö delivers HD03252 on schedule))**: 0.7 (based on Tidö's 2023–25 legislative track record).
 - **Posterior given Lagrådet yttrande exists but with proportionality comments**: 0.55 — reduced by the signal that legal review flagged issues.
@@ -534,12 +525,11 @@ quadrantChart
 **Sources**: All risks anchored to document text at [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) and [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html). Admiralty code B2 (usually reliable source, probably true — government proposition text).
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Unit of analysis**: The Kristersson government's 23 April 2026 proposition bundle as a whole (HD03253, HD03252, HD03256, HD03104).
 
-## Strengths
+### Strengths
 
 | # | Strength | Evidence |
 |:-:|---|---|
@@ -548,7 +538,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | S3 | Deliverable record before September 2026 election — hard effective dates (1 Jul, 1 Aug 2026). | Explicit in [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) "träda i kraft den 1 augusti 2026"; [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) "1 juli 2026". |
 | S4 | Reporting discipline — debt-management evaluation per Budgetlagen submitted on cycle. | [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) submitted to Riksdagen on statutory quinquennial schedule. |
 
-## Weaknesses
+### Weaknesses
 
 | # | Weakness | Evidence |
 |:-:|---|---|
@@ -557,7 +547,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | W3 | Enforcement-capacity gap — tachograph law requires new investigative capability at Polismyndigheten and bilinspektörer. | [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) §5 on new powers; implicit resource question. |
 | W4 | Narrow messaging bandwidth — 4 bills on same day dilute press coverage. | Pattern observation across [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) batch-publication days. |
 
-## Opportunities
+### Opportunities
 
 | # | Opportunity | Evidence |
 |:-:|---|---|
@@ -566,7 +556,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | O3 | Business-community goodwill: tachograph crackdown protects legitimate hauliers. | [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) supports Transportföretagen competitive fairness. |
 | O4 | Frame 2021–2025 debt management as success story. | [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) skrivelse lets government set the narrative. |
 
-## Threats
+### Threats
 
 | # | Threat | Evidence |
 |:-:|---|---|
@@ -575,24 +565,23 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | T3 | Opportunity-cost narrative — "government pushing 4 bills while neglecting X". | Opposition framing risk; no concrete evidence yet on [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html). |
 | T4 | Lagrådet critique on HD03252 could force redraft during committee stage. | [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) Bilaga 5 Lagrådets yttrande already issued — depth of critique to be assessed in Pass 2. |
 
-## TOWS matrix (integrated strategies)
+### TOWS matrix (integrated strategies)
 
 | | Opportunities | Threats |
 |---|---|---|
 | **Strengths** | **SO**: Combine S1 technocratic credibility with O1 EU alignment → position Kristersson as "competent EU player" into election. Evidence: [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html). | **ST**: Use S2 cohesion to suppress T1 coordination — whip discipline on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) vote. |
 | **Weaknesses** | **WO**: Address W1 late transposition by invoking O1 completion narrative. Evidence: [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html). | **WT**: If W2 proportionality challenge + T4 Lagrådet line up, government must redraft — monitor [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) committee timetable. |
 
-## Cross-SWOT
+### Cross-SWOT
 
 The dominant pattern is **"competence vs. rights"** — the government's execution strengths (S1, S2) are challenged by proportionality threats (W2, T4) on HD03252. [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) is structurally safer (EU-mandated, technical); [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) is where political risk concentrates.
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Overall Threat Level**: HIGH · **Severity**: HIGH (TH1, TH2, TH4) / MEDIUM (TH3, TH5) · **Confidence**: HIGH (A2 — primary-source proposition texts HD03252/HD03253/HD03256, FiU referral phase observable).
 
-## Threat taxonomy mapping
+### Threat taxonomy mapping
 
 | # | Threat category | Specific threat | Actor | Target | Evidence |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -602,7 +591,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | TH4 | Information asymmetry | 4-bill bundle on same day suppresses individual scrutiny of HD03252 | Government comms | Media / opposition oversight | Pattern observation 23 April 2026 |
 | TH5 | Coalition instability | L party (historically more liberal on criminal justice) may rebel on HD03252 | L parliamentary group | Tidö cohesion | See `coalition-mathematics.md` |
 
-## Attack tree — HD03252 rights-erosion path
+### Attack tree — HD03252 rights-erosion path
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -618,7 +607,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style E1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
 ```
 
-## Kill-chain-style mapping (TH1 regulatory capture)
+### Kill-chain-style mapping (TH1 regulatory capture)
 
 1. **Recon**: Bankföreningen reviews [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) §3 ärendet-och-dess-beredning.
 2. **Weaponisation**: Technical impact study commissioned (CET1 hit estimation).
@@ -628,7 +617,7 @@ flowchart TD
 6. **Command & control**: Minority-government whip calibration.
 7. **Objective**: Softer effective capital requirements in Swedish implementation than pure EU baseline.
 
-## MITRE-style TTP map (political-analogy)
+### MITRE-style TTP map (political-analogy)
 
 | Tactic | Technique | Proposition locus |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -643,8 +632,7 @@ flowchart TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD03104
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03104-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03104-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html)
 **Document type**: Skrivelse (evaluation report)
@@ -656,19 +644,19 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03104-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Effective date**: N/A (reporting document)
 **Signed**: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Statutory 4-year evaluation of state debt management 2021–2025, including cost-minimisation outcomes, Riksgälden's strategy, and interaction with Riksbanken monetary policy. Covers pandemic-era borrowing, quantitative-tightening environment, and real-rate normalisation.
 
-## Primary-source anchors
+### Primary-source anchors
 
 - Full text and bilagor: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html)
 - Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Niklas Wykman (M))
 - Committee page on riksdagen.se (FiU) — will update when referral decision is announced
 
-## Key provisions (Skr. 2025/26:104)
+### Key provisions (Skr. 2025/26:104)
 
-### Section map
+#### Section map
 
 Contents of HD03104 organised by chapter:
 
@@ -679,27 +667,27 @@ Contents of HD03104 organised by chapter:
 | 3 | Kostnad + risk 2021–2025 | Outcome metrics |
 | 4 | Reflektioner | Forward strategy |
 
-## Analytical notes
+### Analytical notes
 
-### Evidence strength
+#### Evidence strength
 
 - **Primary source**: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).
 - **Secondary source**: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).
 - **Corroboration opportunities**: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).
 
-### DIW calibration
+#### DIW calibration
 
 DIW 2.5 reflects:
 - Annual reporting cadence, moderate market-shaping power, low electoral salience → solid mid-band.
 
-### Stakeholder pressure points
+#### Stakeholder pressure points
 
 - Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.
 - Opposition: partial-cycle framing power (V/MP on rights, S on EU compliance credit).
 - Sector actors:
   - Riksgälden, Riksbanken, Debt-management Advisory Council, institutional bond investors.
 
-### Cross-references to batch
+#### Cross-references to batch
 
 - See [executive-brief.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md) §"HD03104" row.
 - See [significance-scoring.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md) for DIW methodology.
@@ -707,7 +695,7 @@ DIW 2.5 reflects:
 - See [implementation-feasibility.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md) for HD03104 delivery-risk lenses.
 - See [forward-indicators.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md) for dated indicators tied to HD03104.
 
-## Confidence assessment
+### Confidence assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Note |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -716,19 +704,18 @@ DIW 2.5 reflects:
 | Stakeholder impact prediction | MEDIUM | Based on historical parallels + sector structure |
 | Electoral-effect estimate | LOW | 20 weeks to election; segment movement < 0.3 pp at referral phase |
 
-## Provenance
+### Provenance
 
 - **Retrieval**: `get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03104", include_full_text=True)` via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.
 - **JSON snapshot**: `documents/hd03104.json` (same folder).
 - **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling.
 
-## Methodology footer
+### Methodology footer
 
 Per `osint-tradecraft-standards.md` — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.
 
 ### HD03252
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03252-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03252-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md -->
 
 *Traceability note: This heading is a shortened paraphrase for readability. For authoritative cross-referencing, use the official document title (`titel`) in `documents/hd03252.json` together with dok_id `HD03252`.*
 
@@ -742,19 +729,19 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03252-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Effective date**: 1 August 2026
 **Signed**: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Restricts access to specified social-insurance benefits (bostadstillägg, aktivitetsersättning, sjukersättning components) for persons placed in kontrollerat boende or säkerhetsförvaring (security detention). Introduces calibrated exceptions for dependant-support. Lagrådet yttrande attached as Bilaga 5.
 
-## Primary-source anchors
+### Primary-source anchors
 
 - Full text and bilagor: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html)
 - Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Gunnar Strömmer (M))
 - Committee page on riksdagen.se (SfU) — will update when referral decision is announced
 
-## Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:252)
+### Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:252)
 
-### Section map
+#### Section map
 
 Contents of HD03252 organised by chapter:
 
@@ -767,21 +754,21 @@ Contents of HD03252 organised by chapter:
 | 5 | Konsekvenser | Budget/IT/operational impact |
 | Bilaga 5 | Lagrådets yttrande | Constitutional review |
 
-## Analytical notes
+### Analytical notes
 
-### Evidence strength
+#### Evidence strength
 
 - **Primary source**: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).
 - **Secondary source**: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).
 - **Corroboration opportunities**: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).
 
-### DIW calibration
+#### DIW calibration
 
 DIW 3.5 reflects:
 
 - Rights-dimension interaction + pre-election effective date + opposition-polarisation potential → upper mid-band.
 
-### Stakeholder pressure points
+#### Stakeholder pressure points
 
 - Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.
 - Opposition: partial-cycle framing power (V/MP on rights, S on EU compliance credit).
@@ -789,7 +776,7 @@ DIW 3.5 reflects:
 
   - Kriminalvården, Försäkringskassan, Advokatsamfundet, JO, Barnombudsmannen.
 
-### Cross-references to batch
+#### Cross-references to batch
 
 - See [executive-brief.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md) §"HD03252" row.
 - See [significance-scoring.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md) for DIW methodology.
@@ -797,7 +784,7 @@ DIW 3.5 reflects:
 - See [implementation-feasibility.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md) for HD03252 delivery-risk lenses.
 - See [forward-indicators.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md) for dated indicators tied to HD03252.
 
-## Confidence assessment
+### Confidence assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Note |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -806,19 +793,18 @@ DIW 3.5 reflects:
 | Stakeholder impact prediction | MEDIUM | Based on historical parallels + sector structure |
 | Electoral-effect estimate | LOW | 20 weeks to election; segment movement < 0.3 pp at referral phase |
 
-## Provenance
+### Provenance
 
 - **Retrieval**: `get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03252", include_full_text=True)` via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.
 - **JSON snapshot**: `documents/hd03252.json` (same folder).
 - **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling.
 
-## Methodology footer
+### Methodology footer
 
 Per `osint-tradecraft-standards.md` — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.
 
 ### HD03253
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03253-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03253-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html)
 **Document type**: Proposition (EU transposition)
@@ -830,19 +816,19 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03253-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Effective date**: Staggered per EU timetable (main provisions 1 January 2027 with transitional output-floor phase-in)
 **Signed**: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Transposes CRR3 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1623) and CRD6 (Directive (EU) 2024/1619) into Swedish law. Implements Basel III endgame framework — output floor, revised standardised approach, operational-risk calibration. Amends kapitaltäckningslagen (2014:966) and lag om kapitalbuffertar (2014:966).
 
-## Primary-source anchors
+### Primary-source anchors
 
 - Full text and bilagor: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html)
 - Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Niklas Wykman (M))
 - Committee page on riksdagen.se (FiU) — will update when referral decision is announced
 
-## Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:253)
+### Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:253)
 
-### Section map
+#### Section map
 
 Contents of HD03253 organised by chapter:
 
@@ -854,21 +840,21 @@ Contents of HD03253 organised by chapter:
 | 4 | Ikraftträdande | Effective date + transitional | 
 | 5 | Konsekvenser | Budget/IT/operational impact |
 
-## Analytical notes
+### Analytical notes
 
-### Evidence strength
+#### Evidence strength
 
 - **Primary source**: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).
 - **Secondary source**: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).
 - **Corroboration opportunities**: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).
 
-### DIW calibration
+#### DIW calibration
 
 DIW 3.8 reflects:
 
 - Systemic financial impact (4 banks), EU mandate, late transposition, sector lobbying → top of batch.
 
-### Stakeholder pressure points
+#### Stakeholder pressure points
 
 - Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.
 - Opposition: partial-cycle framing power (V/MP on rights, S on EU compliance credit).
@@ -876,7 +862,7 @@ DIW 3.8 reflects:
 
   - Finansinspektionen, Bankföreningen, Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea, LEI-registered investors.
 
-### Cross-references to batch
+#### Cross-references to batch
 
 - See [executive-brief.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md) §"HD03253" row.
 - See [significance-scoring.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md) for DIW methodology.
@@ -884,7 +870,7 @@ DIW 3.8 reflects:
 - See [implementation-feasibility.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md) for HD03253 delivery-risk lenses.
 - See [forward-indicators.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md) for dated indicators tied to HD03253.
 
-## Confidence assessment
+### Confidence assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Note |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -893,19 +879,18 @@ DIW 3.8 reflects:
 | Stakeholder impact prediction | MEDIUM | Based on historical parallels + sector structure |
 | Electoral-effect estimate | LOW | 20 weeks to election; segment movement < 0.3 pp at referral phase |
 
-## Provenance
+### Provenance
 
 - **Retrieval**: `get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03253", include_full_text=True)` via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.
 - **JSON snapshot**: `documents/hd03253.json` (same folder).
 - **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling.
 
-## Methodology footer
+### Methodology footer
 
 Per `osint-tradecraft-standards.md` — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.
 
 ### HD03256
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03256-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03256-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html)
 **Document type**: Proposition (ordinary law)
@@ -917,19 +902,19 @@ _Source: [`documents/HD03256-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Effective date**: 1 July 2026
 **Signed**: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Expands enforcement powers for police and vehicle inspectors to detect and prosecute tachograph manipulation in heavy-goods road transport. Raises fines, expands inspection authority, clarifies criminal liability for fleet operators. Implements parts of EU Mobility Package enforcement directive.
 
-## Primary-source anchors
+### Primary-source anchors
 
 - Full text and bilagor: [data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html)
 - Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Andreas Carlson (KD))
 - Committee page on riksdagen.se (TU) — will update when referral decision is announced
 
-## Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:256)
+### Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:256)
 
-### Section map
+#### Section map
 
 Contents of HD03256 organised by chapter:
 
@@ -941,21 +926,21 @@ Contents of HD03256 organised by chapter:
 | 4 | Ikraftträdande | Effective date + transitional | 
 | 5 | Konsekvenser | Budget/IT/operational impact |
 
-## Analytical notes
+### Analytical notes
 
-### Evidence strength
+#### Evidence strength
 
 - **Primary source**: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).
 - **Secondary source**: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).
 - **Corroboration opportunities**: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).
 
-### DIW calibration
+#### DIW calibration
 
 DIW 2.8 reflects:
 
 - Sectoral (road transport) with narrow direct electorate; enforcement lever vs. sectoral manipulation base rates → mid-band.
 
-### Stakeholder pressure points
+#### Stakeholder pressure points
 
 - Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.
 - Opposition: partial-cycle framing power (V/MP on rights, S on EU compliance credit).
@@ -963,7 +948,7 @@ DIW 2.8 reflects:
 
   - Polismyndigheten, Transportstyrelsen, Sveriges Åkeriföretag, TYA, trade unions (Transport).
 
-### Cross-references to batch
+#### Cross-references to batch
 
 - See [executive-brief.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md) §"HD03256" row.
 - See [significance-scoring.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md) for DIW methodology.
@@ -971,7 +956,7 @@ DIW 2.8 reflects:
 - See [implementation-feasibility.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md) for HD03256 delivery-risk lenses.
 - See [forward-indicators.md](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md) for dated indicators tied to HD03256.
 
-## Confidence assessment
+### Confidence assessment
 
 | Dimension | Confidence | Note |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -980,23 +965,22 @@ DIW 2.8 reflects:
 | Stakeholder impact prediction | MEDIUM | Based on historical parallels + sector structure |
 | Electoral-effect estimate | LOW | 20 weeks to election; segment movement < 0.3 pp at referral phase |
 
-## Provenance
+### Provenance
 
 - **Retrieval**: `get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03256", include_full_text=True)` via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.
 - **JSON snapshot**: `documents/hd03256.json` (same folder).
 - **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling.
 
-## Methodology footer
+### Methodology footer
 
 Per `osint-tradecraft-standards.md` — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Electoral horizon**: September 2026 Riksdag general election (~20 weeks out).
 
-## Seat-projection deltas (qualitative)
+### Seat-projection deltas (qualitative)
 
 | Bill | Likely net M/KD/L/SD effect | Likely net S/V/MP/C effect |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -1007,7 +991,7 @@ _Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 Net effect: **Tidö parties gain marginal advantage from bundle** — ~0.5–1.5 percentage points in aggregate, clustered in law-and-order-sensitive voter segments. See `voter-segmentation.md`.
 
-## Coalition viability post-election
+### Coalition viability post-election
 
 - If Tidö parties (M, KD, L, SD) retain majority → bundle's enforcement dates (1 Jul, 1 Aug) fall before election day — "delivered" narrative available.
 - If opposition (S-led) wins → probability of repeal: HD03252 **30%**, HD03253 **< 5%** (EU-mandated), HD03256 **< 10%**, HD03104 **0%** (reporting only).
@@ -1027,16 +1011,15 @@ flowchart TD
     style L fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
 ```
 
-## Risk to electoral delivery
+### Risk to electoral delivery
 
 - [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) slippage (S2 scenario, 25%) would strip Tidö's "delivered" line → estimated -0.3 pp net.
 - [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) is election-neutral for voters but salient for elite opinion (editorial boards, business lobby).
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md)_
-
-## Current seat map (Riksdag 2022 mandate)
+### Current seat map (Riksdag 2022 mandate)
 
 | Party | Seats | Coalition | Whip discipline |
 |---|:-:|---|---|
@@ -1052,7 +1035,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 | **Tidö bloc** (M+KD+L+SD) | **176** | | Majority = 175 — Tidö holds **+1** |
 | **Opposition** (S+V+C+MP) | **173** | | |
 
-## Pivotal votes per bill
+### Pivotal votes per bill
 
 | Bill | Majority needed | Tidö bloc | Margin | Pivotal scenario |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|---|
@@ -1061,7 +1044,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 | [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) | 175 Ja | 176 Ja (likely + C) | ~+50 | Safe |
 | [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) | Notering (no vote) | — | — | — |
 
-## Critical vote: HD03252
+### Critical vote: HD03252
 
 **+1 margin** is the binding constraint of the Tidö minority-support framework. Two scenarios change arithmetic:
 
@@ -1071,7 +1054,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 | 1 L MP abstains | 175 Ja → still passes (simple majority on Ja count) | 20% |
 | 2+ L MPs abstain or vote Nej | Bill fails or must be amended | 10% |
 
-## Sainte-Laguë projection (2026 baseline scenario)
+### Sainte-Laguë projection (2026 baseline scenario)
 
 Assuming +2pp M/KD aggregate shift (partly attributable to delivery bundle) and -1.5pp L shift:
 
@@ -1097,7 +1080,7 @@ xychart-beta
     line [173, 170]
 ```
 
-## Vote-count discipline historical reference
+### Vote-count discipline historical reference
 
 | Past vote | Tidö bloc Ja | L rebels |
 |---|:-:|:-:|
@@ -1108,10 +1091,9 @@ xychart-beta
 On [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html)-type rights-adjacent bills, whip has held 2/2 historically. Not a guarantee.
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md)_
-
-## Demographic segments
+### Demographic segments
 
 | Segment | HD03252 impact | HD03253 impact | HD03256 impact | HD03104 impact |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1123,7 +1105,7 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | C-leaning (rural business owners) | 0 | – (small-bank proportionality) | + | 0 |
 | Swing voters (decided in last 2 weeks, 2022) | + slight, law-and-order framing | 0 | 0 | 0 |
 
-## Regional segments
+### Regional segments
 
 | Region | Key interaction |
 |---|---|
@@ -1132,23 +1114,22 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | Norrland (Norrbotten, Västerbotten) | HD03252 (per-capita correctional use higher) |
 | Skåne | All (mixed urban/rural) |
 
-## Ideological segments
+### Ideological segments
 
 - **Authoritarian-security axis**: strongly pro-[HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html), pro-[HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html).
 - **Libertarian-rights axis**: opposed to expanded state coercion.
 - **Pro-EU pragmatists**: neutral on [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) (alignment positive but late); positive on [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) fiscal discipline.
 
-## Baseline positions on procedural days
+### Baseline positions on procedural days
 
 On a low-drama propositions day (which today is, electorally — high-salience items but procedural not legislative stage), voter movement is **<0.3 pp** in any segment. Real movement occurs at committee-report stage and Kammaren vote.
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Comparator set**: Nordic (Denmark, Finland, Norway) + EU (Germany, Netherlands).
 
-## Comparator analysis
+### Comparator analysis
 
 | Jurisdiction | CRR3/CRD6 transposition status (April 2026) | Detainee benefit regime | Notes |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -1158,17 +1139,17 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 | Germany | ✅ Transposed Jan 2026 (BaFin implementation) | Differentiated by sentence type; constitutional proportionality bar high | BVerfG case law central |
 | Netherlands | ⚠️ Partial transposition (DNB flagged gaps) | Active reform debate; no full restriction yet | Sweden + NL both late |
 
-## Outside-In analysis
+### Outside-In analysis
 
 1. **Sweden's CRR3 late transposition** ([HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html)) places it in the NL-led late cohort, not the DK/FI-led on-time cohort. EU Commission pattern suggests reasoned-opinion letters precede infringement procedures by ~90 days — putting Sweden in the Q3 2026 risk window.
 2. **Detainee benefit restriction** ([HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html)) aligns Sweden with DK, which has 5+ years of operational experience. Swedish implementation risk lower because of DK template availability; civil-liberty pushback likely to cite DK proportionality litigation.
 
-## Lessons-learned transfer
+### Lessons-learned transfer
 
 - **From DK**: Pre-empt proportionality challenge by embedding carve-outs for dependant-support in regulation (not primary law) — allows faster adjustment.
 - **From DE**: Bundesverfassungsgericht precedents establish that indefinite preventive detention (säkerhetsförvaring equivalent — *Sicherungsverwahrung*) requires robust therapeutic element; [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) benefit restrictions may face similar scrutiny if not paired with rehabilitative investment.
 
-## Mermaid comparison
+### Mermaid comparison
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1186,10 +1167,9 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Historical Parallels
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md -->
 
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md)_
-
-## Parallel 1 — 2014 Basel III transposition (Lag 2014:968)
+### Parallel 1 — 2014 Basel III transposition (Lag 2014:968)
 
 **Similarity score**: **0.75**
 **Comparator**: [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) vs. 2014 Basel III domestic legislation.
@@ -1203,7 +1183,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Lesson**: Committee phase in 2014 saw substantive amendments to output-floor phasing. Expect similar in 2026.
 
-## Parallel 2 — 2006 Fängelsestraff + social-insurance reform (Prop. 2005/06:156)
+### Parallel 2 — 2006 Fängelsestraff + social-insurance reform (Prop. 2005/06:156)
 
 **Similarity score**: **0.65**
 **Comparator**: [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) vs. 2006 benefit-restriction reform for inmates.
@@ -1216,7 +1196,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Lesson**: 2006 amendments eventually survived with carve-outs for dependant-support. Path of least resistance for 2026 is similar compromise.
 
-## Parallel 3 — 2019 Körtidsregler (driving-time enforcement reform)
+### Parallel 3 — 2019 Körtidsregler (driving-time enforcement reform)
 
 **Similarity score**: **0.80**
 **Comparator**: [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) vs. 2019 driving-time enforcement bill.
@@ -1228,7 +1208,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Lesson**: 2019 enforcement took ~18 months to ramp; expect similar for HD03256 post 1 July 2026.
 
-## No-precedent finding: HD03104 evaluation content
+### No-precedent finding: HD03104 evaluation content
 
 The 2021–2025 evaluation period overlaps with unprecedented pandemic-era borrowing (2020–2021). No clean pre-2000 parallel exists. **Historical pattern search returns no match.** Treat HD03104 as *sui generis* for precedent purposes; evaluate on first-principles cost-minimisation-vs-risk metrics.
 
@@ -1246,12 +1226,11 @@ timeline
 ```
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md)_
-
-## Delivery-risk register (four lenses per bill)
+### Delivery-risk register (four lenses per bill)
 
-### HD03252 — Detainee benefits restriction
+#### HD03252 — Detainee benefits restriction
 
 | Lens | Risk level | Notes |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -1260,7 +1239,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 | Regulatory | Medium | Lagrådet proportionality feedback (Bilaga 5) may force implementing-regulation language changes |
 | Workforce | Medium | Kriminalvården + Försäkringskassan case-worker retraining |
 
-### HD03253 — EU Banking Package
+#### HD03253 — EU Banking Package
 
 | Lens | Risk level | Notes |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -1269,7 +1248,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 | Regulatory | **HIGH** | Interplay with existing Swedish systemic-risk buffers; Basel III endgame complexity |
 | Workforce | Low | FI hiring plan already in motion from 2023 QIS work |
 
-### HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement
+#### HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement
 
 | Lens | Risk level | Notes |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -1278,11 +1257,11 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 | Regulatory | Low | Clear EU framework |
 | Workforce | **HIGH** | Bilinspektör role expansion requires cert program; 1 July 2026 deadline tight |
 
-### HD03104 — Debt-mgmt evaluation
+#### HD03104 — Debt-mgmt evaluation
 
 Reporting only — no implementation risk.
 
-## Backlog audit
+### Backlog audit
 
 | Adjacent pending reform | Interaction with today's bundle |
 |---|---|
@@ -1290,7 +1269,7 @@ Reporting only — no implementation risk.
 | FI AI-risk supervisory framework | CRR3 disclosure co-dependencies |
 | Transport planning bill 2026 | Tachograph enforcement sync |
 
-## Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map
+### Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1305,37 +1284,36 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md -->
 
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md)_
-
-## Working hypothesis
+### Working hypothesis
 
 **H0 (working)**: The 23 April 2026 bundle represents a coherent Tidö "pre-election delivery" strategy combining financial-stability institutionalisation with criminal-justice operationalisation.
 
-## Competing hypotheses
+### Competing hypotheses
 
-### H1: Bundle is artefact, not strategy
+#### H1: Bundle is artefact, not strategy
 
 **Claim**: The 4 bills were ready on 23 April by legal-drafting coincidence, not political choreography.
 **Supporting evidence**: Documents span 4 different ministries (Finansdep. × 2, Justitiedep., Landsbygdsdep.) — unusual coordination cost for intentional bundling.
 **Against**: All 4 signed by PM Kristersson personally on the same day — that IS coordination.
 **Assessment**: **LIKELY** for [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) (statutory calendar), **UNLIKELY** for HD03252+HD03253 which required cabinet approval alignment.
 
-### H2: EU pressure, not Tidö priorities, drives the batch
+#### H2: EU pressure, not Tidö priorities, drives the batch
 
 **Claim**: [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) is EU-mandated; [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) implements EU Mobility Package. Tidö fingerprint is weaker than public narrative.
 **Supporting evidence**: 2 of 4 documents are EU transpositions. Finance Minister Wykman is the workhorse, not Justice Minister Strömmer.
 **Against**: [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) is purely domestic and carries clearest Tidö signature.
 **Assessment**: **PARTIAL SUPPORT** — H2 is correct for 2/4 documents; narrative framing conflates Tidö with EU compliance.
 
-### H3: Pre-election "flooding the zone" to suppress individual scrutiny
+#### H3: Pre-election "flooding the zone" to suppress individual scrutiny
 
 **Claim**: Releasing 4 bills same day is intentional information-asymmetry tactic.
 **Supporting evidence**: Pattern seen in Tidö comms strategy 2023–2025; [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) is the most politically sensitive and benefits from dilution.
 **Against**: Lagrådet and FiU/SfU referral processes ensure substantive scrutiny regardless of release timing.
 **Assessment**: **PLAUSIBLE** — probability ~30%. Hard to falsify without inside-comms documentation.
 
-## ACH matrix
+### ACH matrix
 
 | Evidence | H0 Strategy | H1 Artefact | H2 EU-driven | H3 Zone-flood |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -1346,24 +1324,23 @@ _Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | Lagrådet process ongoing | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
 | **Posterior weight** | **0.40** | **0.15** | **0.25** | **0.20** |
 
-## Red-team challenge
+### Red-team challenge
 
 - **Assumption under challenge**: We assume Tidö cohesion holds. What if L backbenchers rebel on [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html)? — see `coalition-mathematics.md`.
 - **Assumption under challenge**: We assume Swedish banks lobby AGAINST [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html). Counter: some banks may actually prefer strict EU alignment for cross-border competitive parity.
 - **Assumption under challenge**: We assume [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) is low-salience. Counter: if it reveals fiscal slippage, it becomes a major opposition weapon.
 
-## Rejected alternatives logged
+### Rejected alternatives logged
 
 - "The batch is a response to a specific crisis" — rejected: no crisis reported in Riksdag chamber record 21–23 April 2026.
 - "HD03252 is constitutionally unsafe and will be struck by HFD" — rejected for now: Lagrådet yttrande exists (Bilaga 5 of [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html)) and the proposition proceeded — threshold evidence is against full unconstitutionality.
 
 ## Classification Results
-
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md)_
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md -->
 
 Per `analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md`.
 
-## Classification matrix
+### Classification matrix
 
 | dok_id | 1. Policy domain | 2. Actor | 3. Geography | 4. Time horizon | 5. Salience | 6. Controversy | 7. Data sensitivity |
 |---|---|---|---|---|:-:|:-:|---|
@@ -1372,13 +1349,13 @@ Per `analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md`.
 | HD03253 | Financial regulation / EU | Finansdep. (Wykman) + FI supervisory | Supra-national (EU) / national | Rolling transposition | **High** | Low-Med | Public OSINT |
 | HD03256 | Transport / criminal law | Landsbygdsdep. (Carlson) + Polisen | National (heavy-goods corridors) | Forward (1 Jul 2026) | Med | Low-Med | Public OSINT |
 
-## Priority tiers
+### Priority tiers
 
 - **T1 (Immediate action)**: HD03253, HD03252
 - **T2 (Active monitoring)**: HD03256
 - **T3 (Contextual)**: HD03104
 
-## Retention & access
+### Retention & access
 
 - **Retention**: 5 years (analysis artifacts), indefinite (public source URLs).
 - **Access**: Public (all source documents are official Regeringen/Riksdagen publications).
@@ -1400,22 +1377,21 @@ flowchart TD
 ```
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md)_
-
-## Policy clusters
+### Policy clusters
 
-### Cluster A: Financial stability & EU alignment
+#### Cluster A: Financial stability & EU alignment
 - [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) EU bankpaket (primary)
 - [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) Statens skuldförvaltning (context)
 - Linkage: Both Finansdepartementet; both position government on macro-financial credibility into 2026 election.
 
-### Cluster B: Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation
+#### Cluster B: Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation
 - [HD03252](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html) Detainee benefit restriction (primary)
 - [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) Tachograph enforcement (adjacent — expands search powers)
 - Linkage: Both expand state coercive authority (HD03252 over benefits; HD03256 over search). Both carry 2026 effective dates.
 
-## Legislative chains
+### Legislative chains
 
 | Parent reform | Today's document | Next step |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -1424,13 +1400,13 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 | EU Mobility Package II (2020) | [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) | TU referral → vote pre-1 July 2026 deadline |
 | Budgetlagen §5:6 (quinquennial reporting) | [HD03104](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html) | FiU assesses; report to Kammaren |
 
-## Coordinated-activity patterns
+### Coordinated-activity patterns
 
 1. **Batch-day publication** — 4 bills same day suggests comms-coordinated release; dilutes per-bill scrutiny (documented pattern on high-agenda days at [riksdagen.se](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html)).
 2. **Pre-recess enactment window** — effective dates (1 Jul HD03256, 1 Aug HD03252) require Kammaren votes by mid-June.
 3. **Minister load balancing** — Wykman carries 2 (finance dossier strong); Strömmer 1 (justice high-salience); Carlson 1 (KD visibility on infra).
 
-## Sibling-folder citations
+### Sibling-folder citations
 
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/` (if produced) — source day for 3 of 4 documents (lookback).
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/` — check for opposition counter-motions.
@@ -1456,18 +1432,17 @@ flowchart TB
 ```
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **VITAL audit of this run's methodology.** Per `osint-tradecraft-standards.md` §ICD 203.
 
-## Evidence sufficiency
+### Evidence sufficiency
 
 - **4 primary source documents** retrieved with full text ≥ 100 000 chars each via `get_dokument_innehall`.
 - Every analytical claim in this run is anchored to either a `dok_id` or a primary-source URL on `riksdagen.se`.
 - **Gap**: No SCB, Riksbanken, IMF, or EU Commission cross-corroboration in this run (single-type workflow scope; reserved for aggregation runs). Flagged.
 
-## Confidence distribution
+### Confidence distribution
 
 | Confidence band | Count | Example |
 |---|:-:|---|
@@ -1477,12 +1452,12 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 
 Balance is appropriate — no false-precision claims; LOW flagged honestly.
 
-## Source diversity
+### Source diversity
 
 - **Single-channel**: All evidence from one MCP server (`riksdag-regering`). Source Diversity Rule says P0/P1 claims need ≥ 3 independent sources; this run has none at P0/P1 threshold, which is acceptable for a referral-phase analysis. Future runs should enrich with FI, Riksbanken, EU Commission sources.
 - Admiralty codes: predominantly **B2** (usually reliable — government official source; probably true — text not yet independently corroborated).
 
-## Party-neutrality arithmetic
+### Party-neutrality arithmetic
 
 | Party mentioned | Positive frames | Negative frames | Neutral |
 |---|:-:|:-:|:-:|
@@ -1497,7 +1472,7 @@ Balance is appropriate — no false-precision claims; LOW flagged honestly.
 
 **Balance check**: Coverage skews government-side due to bundle authorship (unavoidable for a propositions-only run). Opposition stakeholder modelling is mapped but lacks primary-source statements (opposition hasn't spoken yet — referral phase). **Acceptable**, flagged for aggregation enrichment.
 
-## ICD 203 compliance audit (9 standards)
+### ICD 203 compliance audit (9 standards)
 
 | # | Standard | Status | Evidence |
 |:-:|---|:-:|---|
@@ -1511,31 +1486,31 @@ Balance is appropriate — no false-precision claims; LOW flagged honestly.
 | 8 | Accurate judgments of change | ✅ | KJ-1 frames the "implementation-mode" shift |
 | 9 | Authorship clearly identified | ✅ | James Pether Sörling |
 
-## Methodology Improvements (for next run)
+### Methodology Improvements (for next run)
 
-### Improvement 1 — Parse Lagrådet yttrande (Bilaga 5 of HD03252)
+#### Improvement 1 — Parse Lagrådet yttrande (Bilaga 5 of HD03252)
 
 **Current gap**: This run references Lagrådet yttrande existence but did not parse its substance (time-constrained Pass 1). Pass 2 would ideally extract proportionality critique text to raise KJ-3 confidence from MEDIUM to HIGH.
 
 **Action next run**: Script-driven extraction of proposition §"Lagrådet" sections into dedicated artifact.
 
-### Improvement 2 — SCB / Riksbanken cross-source enrichment
+#### Improvement 2 — SCB / Riksbanken cross-source enrichment
 
 **Current gap**: Single-channel MCP sourcing. Missing SCB baseline on incarcerated-persons population and Riksbanken stance on CRR3.
 
 **Action next run**: Budget 5 minutes for SCB `search_tables` + `query_table` on relevant series; include Riksbanken statement if press release is linkable.
 
-### Improvement 3 — Opposition reaction monitoring
+#### Improvement 3 — Opposition reaction monitoring
 
 **Current gap**: Analysis written before opposition party-group statements issued. Stakeholder mapping is predictive, not empirical.
 
 **Action next run**: Schedule a follow-up evening-analysis run for 2026-04-25 or 26 to capture reactions; cross-reference with this analysis via `cross-run-diff.md`.
 
-### Improvement 4 (bonus) — Tier-upgrade candidate flagging
+#### Improvement 4 (bonus) — Tier-upgrade candidate flagging
 
 Current run scoped as Standard tier due to 28-min MCP idle budget. Budget compression prevented DIW ≥ 3.5 items from getting L2+ Priority treatment they arguably deserve. Next time: explicitly flag L3 candidates for immediate aggregation run rather than deferring.
 
-## Known limitations of this run
+### Known limitations of this run
 
 1. Compressed time budget (~28 min) required scope triage — per-document coverage maintained but each file shorter than ideal.
 2. Pass 2 depth calibrated to MCP-session survival; any Pass 2 under 5 minutes should be treated as "mitigation pass" rather than true iterative improvement.
@@ -1544,8 +1519,7 @@ Current run scoped as Standard tier due to 28-min MCP idle budget. Budget compre
 ---
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
-
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md)_
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
 **Generated**: 2026-04-24 00:28 UTC
 **Workflow**: news-propositions
@@ -1557,7 +1531,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 **Window used**: 2026-04-23 00:00–23:59 Europe/Stockholm
 **MCP availability**: `riksdag-regering` ✅ live (get_sync_status OK at 00:27Z); `scb`, `world-bank` not called this run (single-type propositions scope).
 
-## Documents
+### Documents
 
 | dok_id | Title | Type | Ministry | Committee | Retrieval UTC | Full text |
 |--------|-------|------|----------|-----------|---------------|-----------|
@@ -1566,7 +1540,7 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | [HD03253](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html) | EU:s bankpaket | Proposition (Government Bill) | Finansdepartementet | FiU (Finansutskottet) | 2026-04-24T00:27Z | ✅ 100 KB retrieved |
 | [HD03256](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html) | Kraftfullare åtgärder mot manipulation och allvarligt missbruk av färdskrivare | Proposition (Government Bill) | Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdepartementet | TU (Trafikutskottet) | 2026-04-24T00:27Z | ✅ 100 KB retrieved |
 
-## Coverage
+### Coverage
 
 - **propositions**: 30 downloaded, 4 date-matched, 26 excluded (non-matching dates in the MCP window).
 - **motions**: 0 (out of scope — `--doc-type propositions`)
@@ -1574,13 +1548,44 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **votes**: 0 (not in scope — no vote rounds matched for these document IDs yet; referral phase)
 - **speeches / questions / interpellations**: 0 (out of scope)
 
-## Data-quality notes
+### Data-quality notes
 
 1. **Lookback fallback active** — 0 docs published under 2026-04-24; falling back to 2026-04-23 retrieved 4 bills signed by PM Kristersson on 2026-04-23. Normal Swedish government pattern (Thursday release, Friday indexing).
 2. **Full text**: All 4 documents have `fullContent` ≥ 100 000 chars via `get_dokument_innehall` — none flagged `metadata-only`.
 3. **Tachograph document (HD03256)** cross-references transport-law enforcement discussions but no vote record yet — committee referral (TU) expected within 14 days.
 4. **No SCB/IMF calls** this run — fiscal context sourced from MCP document text only. Economic enrichment deferred to evening-analysis or weekly-review workflows.
 
-## Provenance
+### Provenance
 
 All `dok_id` are resolvable at `https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html` (verified pattern). No private or leaked data.
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03104-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03252-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03253-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03256-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/article.md
index c361e2096f..b42c3a653d 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-25
 subfolder: month-ahead
 slug: 2026-04-25-month-ahead
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T14:46:39.097Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:52:21.589Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,20 +26,19 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md -->
 
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md)_
-
-## 🎯 BLUF
+### 🎯 BLUF
 
 Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-election legislative package: the 2026 Spring Budget (HD03100) projecting continued but slow economic recovery, an emergency fuel and energy cost relief (HD03236), and a 19-proposition legislative sprint across justice, energy, environment, and foreign policy. With elections exactly five months away (September 2026), the political risk is firmly centred on economic sentiment — whether household cost relief arrives in time to shift voter preferences — and on the government's credibility on rule-of-law reforms that have been central to the Tidö coalition's mandate since 2022.
 
-## 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
 1. **Economic risk assessment**: Should stakeholders price in accelerated political instability risk before the September 2026 election given the extended recession and the emergency relief budget?
 2. **Legislative pipeline tracking**: Which of the 19 current propositions carry the highest risk of opposition delay or committee blockage before the summer recess (June 2026)?
 3. **Coalition stability**: Does the fuel-tax cut (HD03236) signal SD pressure on the government, and how does that shift coalition mathematics heading into election season?
 
-## 60-Second Intelligence Read
+### 60-Second Intelligence Read
 
 - 🔴 **Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100)** — Spring budget framework projects slow recovery; lågkonjunktur persists longer than earlier forecast. Government targets growth, welfare, security. FiU scrutiny June.
 - 🔴 **Emergency fuel+energy relief (HD03236)** — Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el/gasprisstöd; election-cycle fiscal signal. Cost estimated at several billion SEK.
@@ -48,11 +47,11 @@ Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-elect
 - 🟢 **Ukraine accountability**: Sweden joins aggression tribunal (HD03231) and damages commission (HD03232) — foreign policy cohesion across parties.
 - 🔵 **Forestry deregulation (HD03242)** — contentious Alliansen/landsbygd vote; MP/S/V opposed.
 
-## Top Forward Trigger for May
+### Top Forward Trigger for May
 
 > **Trigger**: Finance Committee (FiU) vote on Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100) and extra ändringsbudget (HD03236) — expected late May / early June. A negative committee opinion or SD abstention on the fiscal framework would be the single most significant political event before the summer recess.
 
-## Confidence Assessment
+### Confidence Assessment
 
 **HIGH** [B2] — Based on 20 verified government propositions and skrivelser from data.riksdagen.se, riksmöte 2025/26.
 
@@ -76,18 +75,17 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-25 | **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Tier**: Tier-C Month-Ahead
 
-## Lead Intelligence Picture
+### Lead Intelligence Picture
 
 May 2026 represents Sweden's most consequential legislative month of the election cycle. The Tidö government (M, SD, KD, L with MP support on energy) is racing to deliver tangible voter benefits before the September 2026 election. The concurrent filing of Vårpropositionen 2026 (HD03100), an emergency relief budget (HD03236), and 17 additional propositions in a single April wave signals a politically motivated legislative sprint.
 
 **Central intelligence assessment**: The government is executing a pre-election delivery strategy targeting three voter segments — cost-pressured households (fuel/energy relief), law-and-order prioritisers (justice package), and rural/landsbygd voters (forestry, wind revenue, harbour law). The strategy is coherent but vulnerable: if economic data for Q1 2026 show continued contraction when released in May, the government's narrative of "recovery under way" collapses.
 
-## DIW-Weighted Document Ranking
+### DIW-Weighted Document Ranking
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Title | DIW Weight | Intelligence Tier |
 |------|--------|-------|-----------|-------------------|
@@ -107,7 +105,7 @@ May 2026 represents Sweden's most consequential legislative month of the electio
 | 14 | HD03244 | Interoperabilitet datadelning | 5.5 | L1 Surface |
 | 15 | HD03252 | Socialförsäkring vid fängelse | 5.5 | L1 Surface |
 
-## Integrated Intelligence Picture
+### Integrated Intelligence Picture
 
 **Economic security vector (CRITICAL)**: The spring budget and emergency relief reflect a government reading household cost pain as the primary electoral vulnerability. The fuel tax cut combined with electricity/gas price support sends a direct signal to households that costs are being addressed. This is responsive governance or election-cycle pandering depending on the observer's frame — the fiscal cost is real (est. SEK 4–8 bn for the combined package based on proportional estimates from HD03236 scope).
 
@@ -138,7 +136,7 @@ quadrantChart
     "Wind Revenue HD03239": [0.50, 0.70]
 ```
 
-## PIR Handoff (Priority Intelligence Requirements for Next Cycle)
+### PIR Handoff (Priority Intelligence Requirements for Next Cycle)
 
 - **PIR-1**: Q1 2026 GDP data release (Statistics Sweden, likely May 2026) — will it confirm or contradict the government's "recovery under way" narrative?
 - **PIR-2**: FiU committee position on HD03100/HD03236 — first opposition position statements expected May 2026.
@@ -146,45 +144,44 @@ quadrantChart
 - **PIR-4**: Environmental review authority (HD03238) — Länsstyrelse and NGO responses to institutional restructuring.
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+### Key Judgments
 
-## Key Judgments
-
-### Key Judgment 1 — Economic Recovery Remains Fragile [MEDIUM confidence]
+#### Key Judgment 1 — Economic Recovery Remains Fragile [MEDIUM confidence]
 
 The Tidö government's Spring Budget 2026 (HD03100 [riksdagen.se]) projects recovery, but the explicit acknowledgement in HC01FiU20 [riksdagen.se] that lågkonjunktur is "more prolonged than expected" indicates the government is managing downside scenarios rather than celebrating growth. **We assess with MEDIUM confidence that Q1 2026 GDP data will show growth between 0% and 0.5% — insufficient to validate the government's recovery narrative but not catastrophic.** The risk of negative Q1 GDP is estimated at 15–20% given external trade headwinds.
 
 Confidence label: **MEDIUM**
 PIR: PIR-1 (Q1 GDP data release date, expected May 2026)
 
-### Key Judgment 2 — Tidö Coalition Will Remain Intact Through September Election [HIGH confidence]
+#### Key Judgment 2 — Tidö Coalition Will Remain Intact Through September Election [HIGH confidence]
 
 Despite fiscal pressure and opposition attacks, **we assess with HIGH confidence that the Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L) will not fracture before the September 2026 election.** SD has a strong electoral incentive to remain associated with the government's law-and-order delivery (HD03237, HD03246 [riksdagen.se]). M/KD/L have no viable alternative coalition partner. The emergency relief budget (HD03236) is a concession designed precisely to manage SD demands. The marginal risk is SD abstention on specific votes, not a confidence crisis.
 
 Confidence label: **HIGH**
 PIR: PIR-3 (SD official position on Vårpropositionen framework)
 
-### Key Judgment 3 — Energy Legislative Package Will Pass With Minor Amendments [HIGH confidence]
+#### Key Judgment 3 — Energy Legislative Package Will Pass With Minor Amendments [HIGH confidence]
 
 The electricity system law (HD03240 [riksdagen.se]) and wind power municipality revenue law (HD03239 [riksdagen.se]) reflect a rare area of broad cross-party support (M, SD, C, L, and conditionally MP). **We assess with HIGH confidence that both will pass the Riksdag before the summer recess**, with possible amendments requiring higher transparency on revenue distribution mechanisms. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) is more contentious and may face one-year implementation delay.
 
 Confidence label: **HIGH**
 PIR: PIR-4 (Environmental review authority legal challenges, Länsstyrelse response)
 
-### Key Judgment 4 — Ukraine International Legal Instruments Will Achieve Near-Unanimous Ratification [VERY HIGH confidence]
+#### Key Judgment 4 — Ukraine International Legal Instruments Will Achieve Near-Unanimous Ratification [VERY HIGH confidence]
 
 Sweden's accession to the special tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine (HD03231 [riksdagen.se]) and the international compensation commission (HD03232 [riksdagen.se]) enjoy support across all eight Riksdag parties. **We assess with VERY HIGH confidence that both propositions will be ratified in May 2026** with near-unanimous votes (expected <5 Nej votes from isolated exceptions).
 
 Confidence label: **VERY HIGH**
 
-### Key Judgment 5 — Government's Election Messaging Will Emphasise Security and Rule of Law [HIGH confidence]
+#### Key Judgment 5 — Government's Election Messaging Will Emphasise Security and Rule of Law [HIGH confidence]
 
 The concentration of justice reform propositions (HD03237, HD03246, HD03252 [riksdagen.se]) in the final pre-election legislative sprint confirms that M/KD leads are prioritising their mandate-delivery narrative on safety and rule of law. **We assess with HIGH confidence that the government's formal election campaign will lead with the crime/justice agenda, with the economic recovery as a secondary but essential supporting theme.** This reflects internal polling awareness that the government's weakest ground is the economy.
 
 Confidence label: **HIGH**
 
-## Key Assumptions Check
+### Key Assumptions Check
 
 | Assumption | Basis | Sensitivity |
 |-----------|-------|-------------|
@@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ Confidence label: **HIGH**
 | FiU committee approves HD03100 | M+SD+KD majority ≥ 175 seats | LOW sensitivity — structural majority |
 | Ukraine treaties: cross-party consensus | Unanimous foreign policy position since 2022 | VERY LOW sensitivity |
 
-## PIR Handoff — Priority Intelligence Requirements
+### PIR Handoff — Priority Intelligence Requirements
 
 - **PIR-1**: Q1 2026 GDP release (SCB, ~May 2026) — key for Scenario A/B/C determination
 - **PIR-2**: FiU committee first reading on HD03100/HD03236 — expected second week of May
@@ -203,7 +200,7 @@ Confidence label: **HIGH**
 - **PIR-6**: First polls post-Vårpropositionen publication — electoral impact measurement
 - **PIR-7**: EU Commission response to HD03242 (forestry) — formal notification risk
 
-## Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)
+### Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)
 
 - **Carried forward from monthly-review (analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/)**: The monthly review's PIR on coalition cohesion (post-SD budget demands) remains open; this assessment provides updated HIGH confidence on coalition stability.
 - **Open PIR on Riksbank rate path** from prior cycles: now partially resolved — KPIF stabilised at 1.9% (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]).
@@ -224,18 +221,17 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Significance Scoring
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md -->
 
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md)_
-
-## Scoring Methodology
+### Scoring Methodology
 - **D** (Domestic Impact): 1–10, parliamentary/electoral/societal significance
 - **I** (International Resonance): 1–10, EU/NATO/Nordic/global implications
 - **W** (Welfare Effect): 1–10, direct citizen welfare impact
 - **DIW Total**: weighted average (D×0.5 + I×0.2 + W×0.3)
 
-## Priority Tier Rankings
+### Priority Tier Rankings
 
-### Tier P0 — Critical National Significance
+#### Tier P0 — Critical National Significance
 
 1. **HD03100 — 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition** [riksdagen.se]
    - D:9.8 | I:7.5 | W:9.2 | **DIW: 9.2**
@@ -247,7 +243,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
    - Direct household cost relief with electoral timing signal; cross-party debate on fiscal responsibility
    - Admiralty: [A1] — primary government document, confirmed
 
-### Tier P1 — High Significance
+#### Tier P1 — High Significance
 
 3. **HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet** [riksdagen.se]
    - D:8.2 | I:7.8 | W:8.0 | **DIW: 8.1**
@@ -269,7 +265,7 @@ _Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
    - D:7.2 | I:6.0 | W:7.0 | **DIW: 7.1**
    - Revenue sharing for host municipalities; critical for renewable rollout acceptance
 
-### Tier P2 — Significant
+#### Tier P2 — Significant
 
 8. **HD03231 — Ukraine aggression tribunal** [riksdagen.se]
    - D:6.5 | I:9.5 | W:5.0 | **DIW: 6.8**
@@ -301,58 +297,57 @@ xychart-beta
 ```
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
-
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-25 | **Note**: Qualitative assessment only — no systematic media corpus gathered in this run.
 
-## Government/Coalition Party Framing
+### Government/Coalition Party Framing
 
-### Moderaterna (M)
+#### Moderaterna (M)
 **Predicted framing**: "Ansvar och reform — leverans på löften" (Responsibility and reform — delivery on promises)
 - Will present HD03100 as proof of economic management competence
 - Energy package (HD03240, HD03239) framed as "green competitiveness" not just "green transition"
 - Crime laws (HD03237, HD03246) framed as "trygghet" — safety and security delivery
 
-### Sverigedemokraterna (SD)
+#### Sverigedemokraterna (SD)
 **Predicted framing**: "Sverige först — kostnader ned, brott upp, vi levererar" (Sweden first — costs down, crime up, we deliver)
 - HD03236 (fuel tax cut) will be the primary SD-branded win
 - Juvenile justice (HD03246) presented as SD's distinctive policy victory
 - Will avoid taking credit for energy transition aspects (ideological tension)
 
-### Kristdemokraterna (KD)
+#### Kristdemokraterna (KD)
 **Predicted framing**: "Familjer och trygghet" (Families and safety)
 - KD will focus on HD03246 (juvenile justice) — crime/family values intersection
 - Will present HD03237 (police education) as long-term investment in community safety
 
-### Liberalerna (L)
+#### Liberalerna (L)
 **Predicted framing**: "Reformer för frihet och integration" (Reforms for freedom and integration)
 - Most likely to frame energy transition as EU alignment
 - Weakest position in the sprint — will struggle to differentiate from M
 
-## Opposition Framing
+### Opposition Framing
 
-### Socialdemokraterna (S)
+#### Socialdemokraterna (S)
 **Predicted framing**: "För lite, för sent, för dyrt" (Too little, too late, too expensive)
 - Will attack HD03236 as inadequate compared to household cost pressures
 - Will present HD03100 (spring budget) as a "budget för valvinst, inte för Sverige" (budget for electoral victory, not for Sweden)
 - Will attack HD03238 (env authority) as weakening environmental protection
 
-### Vänsterpartiet (V)
+#### Vänsterpartiet (V)
 **Predicted framing**: "Skattelättnad för bil, ingenting för boende" (Tax cuts for cars, nothing for housing)
 - Sharpest critique will focus on housing absence from legislative sprint
 - Will use HD03236 to frame Tidö as "the car lobby's government"
 
-### Miljöpartiet (MP)
+#### Miljöpartiet (MP)
 **Predicted framing**: "Klimatbrott mot framtida generationer" (Climate crime against future generations)
 - Sharpest opposition to HD03242 (forestry) and potential HD03238 weakening
 - Will use any implementation delays in env authority as confirmation of green regression
 
-### Centerpartiet (C)
+#### Centerpartiet (C)
 **Predicted framing**: Mixed — will support energy reforms (HD03239/HD03240) while attacking fiscal framework
 - C is internally divided on supporting Tidö energy policies; rural wing supports HD03239
 
-## Press Coverage Predicted Polarisation
+### Press Coverage Predicted Polarisation
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -369,7 +364,7 @@ flowchart LR
     style Mixed fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)
+### Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)
 
 | Date | Event | Expected framing shift |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -379,12 +374,11 @@ flowchart LR
 | June 2026 | Riksdag summer recess | Campaign mode begins formally |
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-25 | **Lens**: 6-Dimension Stakeholder Matrix
 
-## Stakeholder Influence Network
+### Stakeholder Influence Network
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -404,41 +398,41 @@ flowchart LR
     style K fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
 ```
 
-## 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
+### 6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix
 
-### Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalition)
+#### Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalition)
 - **Key actors**: PM Ulf Kristersson (M), Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M), Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M), Energy/Climate: Lotta Edholm/Johan Britz (KD/M)
 - **Primary interest**: Deliver visible reforms before September election; maintain coalition coherence; manage economic narrative
 - **Position on May 2026 package**: Strongly supportive; package is core election preparation
 - **Influence**: HIGH (government controls legislative agenda via Riksdag majority)
 - **Source**: HD03100, HD03237, HD03246 [riksdagen.se]
 
-### Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)
+#### Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)
 - **Key actors**: S party leader (parliamentary opposition), V (Nooshi Dadgostar), MP leadership, C (Muharrem Demirok)
 - **Primary interest**: Maximise opposition visibility; frame government as incompetent economic manager
 - **Position**: S — relief insufficient and late; V — structural inequality ignored; MP — environmental reforms rushed; C — supports some deregulation (HD03242) but criticises justice overreach
 - **Influence**: MEDIUM (132 seats; cannot block with votes but strong media/committee presence)
 - **Source**: HC01FiU20 opposition positions [riksdagen.se]
 
-### Lens 3: Business/Industry
+#### Lens 3: Business/Industry
 - **Key actors**: Svenskt Näringsliv, Energiföretagen Sverige, Skogsindustrierna, banking sector (EU bankpaket HD03253)
 - **Primary interest**: Predictable regulatory environment; energy cost competitiveness; fast permitting (HD03238)
 - **Position**: Broadly supportive of deregulation package; concerns about new environmental authority's operational readiness
 - **Influence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (economic feedback loops; employer associations inform FiU)
 
-### Lens 4: Labour/Civil Society
+#### Lens 4: Labour/Civil Society
 - **Key actors**: LO (blue-collar), TCO (white-collar), SACO (academic), BRIS, Civil Rights Defenders, Naturskyddsföreningen
 - **Primary interest**: LO — real wage recovery; BRIS — juvenile justice rights; Naturskyddsföreningen — HD03238/HD03242 opposition
 - **Position**: LO cautious on spring budget adequacy; BRIS opposes HD03246; Naturskyddsföreningen ready to challenge HD03238
 - **Influence**: MEDIUM (civil society litigation capacity; LO's voter bloc signal to S)
 
-### Lens 5: International/EU
+#### Lens 5: International/EU
 - **Key actors**: European Commission (EU Banking Package HD03253, EIA Directive HD03238), CoE (ECHR HD03246), ICC/UN (Ukraine tribunals HD03231/232), NATO allies
 - **Primary interest**: Swedish compliance with EU directives; rule-of-law standards; Ukraine accountability participation
 - **Position**: Supportive on Ukraine; monitoring HD03238 for EIA compliance; neutral on domestic fiscal measures
 - **Influence**: MEDIUM-HIGH on regulatory compliance; LOW on domestic politics
 
-### Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)
+#### Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)
 - **Key actors**: Governor (vacant replacement post-Thedéen term?), executive board
 - **Primary interest**: KPIF stability at 2% target; ECB coordination; exchange rate stability
 - **Position**: HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se] notes KPIF ~1.9% in 2024; further rate cuts possible if recession deepens
@@ -446,10 +440,9 @@ flowchart LR
 - **Evidence**: HC01FiU24 FiU evaluation of Riksbankens penningpolitik 2024 [riksdagen.se]
 
 ## Forward Indicators
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md -->
 
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md)_
-
-## 72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)
+### 72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)
 
 | # | Indicator | Source | Significance | Trigger |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -458,7 +451,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | 3 | M party spokesperson statement on economic narrative | M press office | MEDIUM | Sets framing for media cycle |
 | 4 | Environmental NGO (Naturskyddsföreningen) response to HD03238 | NGO press release | MEDIUM | Early legal challenge signal |
 
-## One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)
+### One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)
 
 | # | Indicator | Source | Significance | Trigger |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -469,7 +462,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | 9 | SiS (Statens institutionsstyrelse) response to HD03246 | SiS press office | MEDIUM | Juvenile justice implementation signal |
 | 10 | HD03231/232 committee scheduling (UtU) | riksdagen.se/utskott | LOW | Ukraine ratification timeline confirmed |
 
-## One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)
+### One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)
 
 | # | Indicator | Source | Significance | Trigger |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -480,7 +473,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | 15 | Environmental review authority NGO court filing | Administrative court | MEDIUM | PIR-4 confirmation |
 | 16 | Riksdag final vote HD03100 (Vårpropositionen) | riksdagen.se | HIGH | Coalition majority confirmed |
 
-## Election Horizon (September 2026)
+### Election Horizon (September 2026)
 
 | # | Indicator | Source | Significance | Trigger |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -489,7 +482,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | 19 | Final Sifo pre-election poll | Sifo | VERY HIGH | Seat projection update |
 | 20 | KD and L final poll numbers vs 4% threshold | Multiple pollsters | HIGH | Tidö continuation feasibility |
 
-## Indicators Summary Chart
+### Indicators Summary Chart
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -510,16 +503,15 @@ timeline
 ```
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md)_
-
-## Scenario Framework
+### Scenario Framework
 
 Three scenarios are constructed for the May–June 2026 window (before summer Riksdag recess).
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario A: Economic Recovery Signal — "Soft Landing" (Probability: 30%)
+### Scenario A: Economic Recovery Signal — "Soft Landing" (Probability: 30%)
 
 **Description**: Q1 2026 GDP data released in May shows modest positive growth (0.5–1.5%). Riksbanken signals a possible additional rate cut. The fuel and energy relief package (HD03236) is welcomed by households. The legislative sprint completes on schedule. The government enters summer recess with an economic credibility boost.
 
@@ -537,7 +529,7 @@ Three scenarios are constructed for the May–June 2026 window (before summer Ri
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario B: Prolonged Stagnation — "More of the Same" (Probability: 55%)
+### Scenario B: Prolonged Stagnation — "More of the Same" (Probability: 55%)
 
 **Description**: Q1 2026 GDP is flat (0–0.5%) or marginally positive. Recession continues but doesn't deepen significantly. The spring budget and emergency relief pass but are deemed insufficient by opposition. Legislative sprint completes for all non-contested items; forestry (HD03242) and youth justice (HD03246) face prolonged committee scrutiny. The government governs competently but without a transformative narrative.
 
@@ -555,7 +547,7 @@ Three scenarios are constructed for the May–June 2026 window (before summer Ri
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario C: Economic Deterioration — "Crisis Narrative" (Probability: 15%)
+### Scenario C: Economic Deterioration — "Crisis Narrative" (Probability: 15%)
 
 **Description**: Q1 2026 GDP is negative (below -0.5%). US tariff escalation hits Swedish industrial exports in May. Riksbanken signals emergency rate cuts. The emergency relief package is judged too small by public opinion. SD makes public demands for a larger relief budget or threatens abstentions. The "crisis government" narrative takes hold.
 
@@ -574,7 +566,7 @@ Three scenarios are constructed for the May–June 2026 window (before summer Ri
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario D: Foreign Policy Escalation — "Ukraine Emergency" (Probability: <5%, monitored)
+### Scenario D: Foreign Policy Escalation — "Ukraine Emergency" (Probability: <5%, monitored)
 
 **Description**: Russia escalates hybrid warfare against Sweden following ratification of Ukraine aggression tribunal accession (HD03231). Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure; disinformation campaign; energy supply disruption. Riksdag enters emergency session.
 
@@ -584,7 +576,7 @@ Three scenarios are constructed for the May–June 2026 window (before summer Ri
 
 ---
 
-## Scenario Probability Summary
+### Scenario Probability Summary
 
 | Scenario | Probability | WEP Term | Leading Indicator |
 |----------|-------------|----------|-------------------|
@@ -604,10 +596,9 @@ pie title Scenario Probability Distribution — May 2026
 ```
 
 ## Risk Assessment
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md -->
 
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md)_
-
-## Risk Register
+### Risk Register
 
 | Risk ID | Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | L×I | Category | Mitigation | Admiralty |
 |---------|------|-----------------|--------------|-----|----------|------------|-----------|
@@ -622,24 +613,24 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R-09 | Energy system law (HD03240) creates market uncertainty | 2 | 4 | 8 | Economic | Clarity in transitional rules; stakeholder consultation | [B2] |
 | R-10 | Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) faces non-ratification delay | 1 | 3 | 3 | Foreign | Cross-party whip management | [A2] |
 
-## Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 12)
+### Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 12)
 
-### R-01: Economic Narrative Collapse (L×I = 20) — CRITICAL
+#### R-01: Economic Narrative Collapse (L×I = 20) — CRITICAL
 Sweden has been in lågkonjunktur since 2023. The Riksbank cut rates in 2024, and KPIF stabilised at ~1.9% (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]). However, HD03100 [riksdagen.se] explicitly acknowledges the recession is "more prolonged than expected." If Statistics Sweden (SCB) releases Q1 2026 GDP showing negative or flat growth in May, the government's narrative of "recovery under way" — the central premise of the Spring Budget — is contradicted by data.
 
 **Posterior probability**: ~40% that Q1 2026 GDP growth will be negative or below 0.5% [C2]
 
-### R-03: Environmental Review Authority Legal Challenges (L×I = 16)
+#### R-03: Environmental Review Authority Legal Challenges (L×I = 16)
 The new authority (HD03238 [riksdagen.se]) is designed to replace multiple Länsstyrelse functions and streamline permit processing. NGOs (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF) are likely to challenge the constitutional basis of removing environmental checks from regional authorities. Administrative courts could issue injunctions.
 
 **Cascading chain**: HD03238 delay → renewable energy project delays → energy system law (HD03240) implementation gaps → Sweden's climate targets slip
 
-### R-04: "Crisis Government" Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)
+#### R-04: "Crisis Government" Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)
 S, V, MP collectively hold 132 seats. With the spring budget providing cover for unified messaging, S's economic policy team (under assumed leadership) will frame every relief measure as "inadequate" and every reform as "hurried and legally fragile before the election."
 
 **Cascading chain**: Negative economic data → opposition credibility gain → voter intention shift → SD reassessment of coalition value
 
-## Risk Heat Map
+### Risk Heat Map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -664,12 +655,11 @@ xychart-beta
 | R-10 Ukraine non-ratification | 1 | 3 | 3 | 🟢 LOW |
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md)_
-
-## SWOT Matrix
+### SWOT Matrix
 
-### Strengths
+#### Strengths
 
 | Strength | Evidence | Impact | Admiralty |
 |----------|----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -679,7 +669,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Ukraine solidarity (cross-party) | HD03231 + HD03232 [riksdagen.se] enjoy near-universal Riksdag support; Sweden's NATO/rule-of-law standing reinforced | HIGH | [A1] |
 | Police reform credibility | HD03237 [riksdagen.se] — paid police education addresses the force's staffing crisis directly | MEDIUM-HIGH | [A1] |
 
-### Weaknesses
+#### Weaknesses
 
 | Weakness | Evidence | Impact | Admiralty |
 |----------|----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -689,7 +679,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Juvenile justice reform (HD03246) ECHR vulnerability | Tougher rules for under-18s may face Council of Europe scrutiny | MEDIUM | [B2] |
 | Forestry deregulation (HD03242) divides Sweden's international image | Green credentials questioned by NGOs citing Natura 2000 [riksdagen.se context] | MEDIUM | [B3] |
 
-### Opportunities
+#### Opportunities
 
 | Opportunity | Evidence | Impact | Admiralty |
 |-------------|----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -698,7 +688,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Ukraine leadership position builds NATO credibility | HD03231/HD03232 [riksdagen.se] — Sweden as early mover on accountability mechanisms | MEDIUM | [A1] |
 | Police reform delivers visible quick wins | HD03237 [riksdagen.se] — increased police presence measurable before September election | MEDIUM-HIGH | [A2] |
 
-### Threats
+#### Threats
 
 | Threat | Evidence | Impact | Admiralty |
 |--------|----------|--------|-----------|
@@ -708,14 +698,14 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Environmental review authority implementation failure | HD03238 [riksdagen.se] — tight timeline to establish new authority by 2027; legal challenges from NGOs likely | MEDIUM | [B3] |
 | International trade risk (US tariffs) | Global trade uncertainty (WEO Apr-2026 context) affects Swedish export-dependent industries | HIGH | [C2] |
 
-## TOWS Strategic Matrix
+### TOWS Strategic Matrix
 
 | | **Strengths** | **Weaknesses** |
 |---|---|---|
 | **Opportunities** | **SO**: Deploy Ukraine leadership to reinforce security credibility before election; use police reform delivery as election-season visible win | **WO**: Use energy package (HD03240/239) to counter recession weakness; frame environmental reform as pro-growth |
 | **Threats** | **ST**: Strong legislative sprint insulates against single-issue opposition attacks; coalition breadth provides buffer against SD ultimatums | **WT**: Economic weakness + fiscal ad-hoc measures + extended recession = narrative crisis if Q1 GDP is negative |
 
-## Cross-SWOT Theme: Election Countdown Compression
+### Cross-SWOT Theme: Election Countdown Compression
 
 All SWOT elements are compressed by the 5-month election countdown. Strengths must translate to voter perception before September 2026. Weaknesses — especially the economic data — are existential if Q1 2026 shows no recovery. The window for corrective action closes in July (Riksdag summer recess).
 
@@ -741,12 +731,11 @@ quadrantChart
 ```
 
 ## Threat Analysis
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md)_
+### Political Threat Taxonomy
 
-## Political Threat Taxonomy
-
-### Category 1: Electoral Threats
+#### Category 1: Electoral Threats
 
 **T-E01**: Opposition "crisis economy" attack campaign
 - **Vector**: Unified S/V/MP messaging on economic failure
@@ -764,7 +753,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Severity**: HIGH
 - Source: HD03236 scope (fuel tax cut — magnitude unknown without full text) [riksdagen.se]
 
-### Category 2: Institutional/Legal Threats
+#### Category 2: Institutional/Legal Threats
 
 **T-L01**: Constitutional Court/Administrative Court challenge to HD03238 (Environmental Review Authority)
 - **Vector**: NGO coalition (Naturskyddsföreningen, ClientEarth, WWF Sweden) seeking injunction
@@ -779,7 +768,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Severity**: MEDIUM (long-term)
 - Source: HD03246 [riksdagen.se]
 
-### Category 3: Economic/External Threats
+#### Category 3: Economic/External Threats
 
 **T-X01**: US tariff escalation on Swedish manufactured goods
 - **Vector**: WTO-incompatible tariffs on Swedish automotive, steel, pharmaceutical exports
@@ -794,7 +783,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Severity**: MEDIUM-HIGH
 - Source: HD03231 [riksdagen.se]; Sweden's NATO status (2024)
 
-### Category 4: Coalition Threats
+#### Category 4: Coalition Threats
 
 **T-C01**: SD threatens to vote against Vårproposition if fuel relief insufficient
 - **Vector**: SD leadership signals insufficient cost-of-living support; demands more
@@ -803,7 +792,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Severity**: HIGH (but low probability given election proximity — SD also benefits from Tidö success)
 - Source: Tidö coalition structure; HD03236 [riksdagen.se]
 
-## Attack Tree: Coalition Collapse Scenario
+### Attack Tree: Coalition Collapse Scenario
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -827,247 +816,237 @@ flowchart TD
     style F fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Intelligence Summary
+### Intelligence Summary
 
 The most credible threat combination is: **economic data shock (T-X01/T-E01) + opposition narrative exploitation (T-E01)** creating a "lame duck" perception of the government in its final legislative months. This is not likely to trigger coalition collapse (SD has no electoral incentive to destabilise before September), but it could significantly damage the government's vote share and undermine mandate-continuity arguments.
 
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD03100
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03100-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03100 | **Type**: Proposition | **Level**: L3 | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 The 2026 Spring Budget (Ekonomisk vårproposition) is the government's primary macroeconomic policy statement before the September 2026 election. It establishes the fiscal framework, growth projections, and spending priorities for 2026–2030.
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03100/
 
-## Political Significance [DIW: 10/10 | Admiralty: B1]
+### Political Significance [DIW: 10/10 | Admiralty: B1]
 This is the highest-significance document of the legislative sprint. It defines the government's economic record and campaign narrative. The Vårpropositionen is:
 - The primary tool for framing "economic recovery" as a government achievement
 - The fiscal foundation upon which HD03236 (emergency relief) and HD0399 (spring amendment) layer
 - The document that opposition parties (S) will attack most vigorously
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 - GDP growth forecast 2026: ~1.5% (recovering from lågkonjunktur)
 - Inflation projection: ~2.0% (aligned with Riksbank target)
 - Employment target: Unemployment declining from current ~8.5%
 - Structural surplus: Budget balance target maintained
 - Defence spending: Continued increase to NATO 2% target
 
-## Legislative Risk
+### Legislative Risk
 - Must pass FiU committee first reading (expected 2026-05-06)
 - Coalition vote: M+SD+KD+L = 176 seats (1 seat majority)
 - Risk of SD demanding amendments to fiscal relief component before final vote
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 HD03100 is the PIR-1 anchor: if Q1 GDP release (SCB, May 2026) confirms ≥1.5% growth, the Vårpropositionen narrative holds. If GDP is negative, the document becomes the government's primary vulnerability.
 
 ### HD03231
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03231-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03231 | **Type**: Proposition | **Level**: L2 | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03231/
 
-## Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
+### Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
 This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.
 
-## Intelligence Note
+### Intelligence Note
 Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.
 
 ### HD03236
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03236-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03236 | **Type**: Ändringsbudget | **Level**: L3 | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 An extra ändringsbudget providing emergency cost-of-living relief via fuel tax reductions and electricity/gas price support for households and businesses.
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03236/
 
-## Political Significance [DIW: 9/10 | Admiralty: B1]
+### Political Significance [DIW: 9/10 | Admiralty: B1]
 This is the most politically contentious fiscal document in the sprint. Its use of the extra ändringsbudget instrument signals urgency and executive action. It is the primary visible concession to SD's cost-of-living demands.
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 - Reduced drivmedelsskatt (fuel excise) estimated at 0.50–1.00 SEK/litre
 - Electricity price support for households above a consumption threshold
 - Gas price relief mechanism
 - Total estimated fiscal cost: 5–8 billion SEK (based on typical relief scope)
 
-## Intelligence Significance
+### Intelligence Significance
 The H3 hypothesis (SD ultimatum) in devils-advocate.md finds its primary support in this document. The extraordinary use of an extra ändringsbudget for what is essentially a routine relief measure suggests a political forcing event.
 
 ### HD03237
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03237-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03237-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03237 | **Type**: Proposition | **Level**: L2 | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03237/
 
-## Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
+### Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
 This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.
 
-## Intelligence Note
+### Intelligence Note
 Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.
 
 ### HD03238
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03238-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03238-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03238 | **Type**: Proposition | **Level**: L2 | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03238/
 
-## Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
+### Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
 This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.
 
-## Intelligence Note
+### Intelligence Note
 Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.
 
 ### HD03239
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03239-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03239-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03239 | **Type**: Proposition | **Level**: L2 | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03239/
 
-## Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
+### Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
 This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.
 
-## Intelligence Note
+### Intelligence Note
 Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.
 
 ### HD03240
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03240-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03240-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03240 | **Type**: Proposition | **Level**: L2+ | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 Comprehensive legislation restructuring the Swedish electricity grid regulatory framework, including new balancing rules, consumer rights, and grid capacity planning mandates.
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03240/
 
-## Political Significance [DIW: 8/10 | Admiralty: B2]
+### Political Significance [DIW: 8/10 | Admiralty: B2]
 Part of the integrated energy reform trilogy (HD03238+HD03239+HD03240). The broadest cross-party support among all three — even V and MP are likely to support or abstain. Aligns with EU electricity market reform agenda.
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 - New balancing mechanism requirements for grid operators
 - Enhanced consumer rights for commercial electricity buyers
 - Long-term grid capacity planning obligation for Svenska kraftnät
 - Smart meter data access standards
 
-## Implementation Feasibility [Score: 7/10]
+### Implementation Feasibility [Score: 7/10]
 Svenska kraftnät has existing capacity. Primary risk is industry consultation phase extending timelines.
 
 ### HD03246
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD03246-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD03246-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md -->
 
 **dok_id**: HD03246 | **Type**: Proposition | **Level**: L2 | **Date**: 2026-04
 
-## Document Summary
+### Document Summary
 
 See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).
 
 **URL**: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03246/
 
-## Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
+### Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]
 This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.
 
-## Key Provisions
+### Key Provisions
 See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.
 
-## Intelligence Note
+### Intelligence Note
 Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.
 
 ### cluster\-remaining
-
-_Source: [`documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md -->
 
 **Cluster**: HD03242, HD03232, HD03233, HD03234, HD03243, HD03244, HD03245, HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD0399, HD03104
 
-## Cluster Overview
+### Cluster Overview
 
 These 12 documents complement the 8 top-priority propositions analyzed individually. They are grouped by policy domain.
 
-## Sub-cluster A: International Law & Cooperation
+### Sub-cluster A: International Law & Cooperation
 - **HD03232** — Ukraine international compensation commission (companion to HD03231 tribunal accession)
 - **HD03233** — International treaty measure (companion)
 - **HD03234** — Europol protocol — Swedish participation in enhanced enforcement cooperation
 
 **Assessment**: All three have near-unanimous Riksdag support. HD03232 and HD03231 form an integrated Ukraine accountability framework. See coalition-mathematics.md for voting pattern.
 
-## Sub-cluster B: Criminal Justice
+### Sub-cluster B: Criminal Justice
 - **HD03252** — Detention conditions reform (SiS capacity + EU compliance)
 - **HD03253** — Court process reform — companion to juvenile justice package (HD03246)
 - **HD03245** — Criminal sanction reform
 
 **Assessment**: These three form the secondary layer of the "rule of law sprint" (see cross-reference-map.md). They add depth to the M/SD/KD electoral narrative on safety.
 
-## Sub-cluster C: Environment & Land Use
+### Sub-cluster C: Environment & Land Use
 - **HD03242** — Forestry regulation reform (EU deforestation regulation compatibility)
 - **HD03243** — Land management reform
 - **HD03244** — Rural property rights
 
 **Assessment**: HD03242 is the most contentious in this cluster — faces EU Commission compatibility scrutiny under the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). Risk of formal EU notification.
 
-## Sub-cluster D: Budget Mechanisms
+### Sub-cluster D: Budget Mechanisms
 - **HD0399** — Spring amendment budget (riksmöte 2025/26 formal vehicle)
 - **HD03104** — Supplementary budget mechanism
 
 **Assessment**: Fiscal implementation vehicles for HD03100/HD03236 policy objectives. High procedural significance, low political drama.
 
-## Sub-cluster E: Miscellaneous
+### Sub-cluster E: Miscellaneous
 - **HD03256** — Administrative reform (Statskontoret delegation area)
 
 **Assessment**: Low political visibility; implementation efficiency in government operations.
 
-## Admiralty Assessment
+### Admiralty Assessment
 [B2] for all documents in this cluster — secondary legislative significance confirmed by riksdagen.se publication dates and cross-committee referral patterns.
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-25 | **Election**: Sweden General Election, September 2026
 
-## Current Seat Projections (2026-Q1 estimates; no new polling in this run)
+### Current Seat Projections (2026-Q1 estimates; no new polling in this run)
 
 Based on polling through Q1 2026 (Novus/Sifo tracking, most recent available):
 
@@ -1086,14 +1065,14 @@ Based on polling through Q1 2026 (Novus/Sifo tracking, most recent available):
 **Bloc estimate**: Tidö (M+SD+KD+L): ~165 seats | S-bloc (S+V+MP+C): ~184 seats
 **Threshold concerns**: KD (17) and L (14) both approaching 4% threshold
 
-## Key Electoral Variables for May–September 2026
+### Key Electoral Variables for May–September 2026
 
 1. **Q1 GDP release** (PIR-1): If ≥ 0%, reduces S-bloc economic advantage by ~3pp
 2. **Crime statistics** (May 2026 BRÅ release): Tidö's strongest electoral ground
 3. **Energy prices** (electricity spot price trajectory): Direct voter sentiment impact
 4. **SD moderation signals**: SD may make tactical moderation moves to attract centre-right swing voters
 
-## Coalition Formation Scenarios Post-Election
+### Coalition Formation Scenarios Post-Election
 
 | Scenario | Probability | Composition | Feasibility |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -1112,12 +1091,11 @@ pie title Coalition Formation Probability
 ```
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
-
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md)_
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-25 | **Riksdag**: 349 seats | **Majority threshold**: 175
 
-## Current Tidö Vote Distribution (2022 mandate)
+### Current Tidö Vote Distribution (2022 mandate)
 
 | Party | Seats | Coalition role |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -1127,7 +1105,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 | L | 16 | Core |
 | **Tidö total** | **176** | 1 seat majority |
 
-## May 2026 Legislative Votes — Expected Ja/Nej Distribution
+### May 2026 Legislative Votes — Expected Ja/Nej Distribution
 
 | Proposition | M | SD | KD | L | S | V | MP | C | Expected outcome |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1142,7 +1120,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 *Note: Seat counts are 2022 election values. Frånvarande/abstention patterns typical; effective majority may differ. C party position on HD03239 (wind revenue) is assumed supportive based on rural energy interests but not formally confirmed.*
 
-## Threshold Vulnerability Analysis
+### Threshold Vulnerability Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -1156,10 +1134,9 @@ xychart-beta
 **Critical observation**: Four of the eight key May votes have a projected margin of just 1 seat (176 seats = threshold 175 + 1). A single MP absence or SD rebellion on any of these votes creates a forced revote. This is the primary legislative risk for May 2026.
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md)_
-
-## Key Segments Relevant to Legislative Sprint
+### Key Segments Relevant to Legislative Sprint
 
 | Segment | Size est. | Current alignment | Policy driver | Legislative response |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1171,11 +1148,11 @@ _Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | SME entrepreneurs | ~7% | M | Business regulation, energy costs | HD03240 (electricity) |
 | Young voters 18–29 | ~10% | S+MP | Climate, housing, jobs | No direct legislative response in this sprint |
 
-## Implications for May–August Campaign Messaging
+### Implications for May–August Campaign Messaging
 
 The legislative sprint targets the Southern working class (HD03236), security-concerned suburban (HD03237/HD03246), and rural energy (HD03239) segments most precisely. The young voter segment (10%) is notably absent from the legislative priorities — a structural gap that could become a S/MP attack surface.
 
-## Regional Analysis
+### Regional Analysis
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -1188,16 +1165,15 @@ pie title Voter Segment Targeting Reach
 ```
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Comparator set**: Nordic peers (Denmark, Norway, Finland) + Germany + UK (post-Labour)
 
-## Outside-In Framework
+### Outside-In Framework
 
 Sweden's current political-economic positioning is assessed against comparable democratic governance systems facing similar structural pressures.
 
-## Comparator Analysis
+### Comparator Analysis
 
 | Jurisdiction | GDP Growth 2025 | Election Context | Policy Parallelism | Key Divergence |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1209,21 +1185,21 @@ Sweden's current political-economic positioning is assessed against comparable d
 
 *Note: GDP figures are approximate based on IMF WEO Apr-2026 context. Admiralty [C2] for cross-country estimates.*
 
-## Detailed Comparator Profiles
+### Detailed Comparator Profiles
 
-### Denmark — Model for Pre-Election Energy Reform
+#### Denmark — Model for Pre-Election Energy Reform
 Denmark's revenue-sharing model for offshore wind (Havmøllefond) predates Sweden's HD03239 by six years. Danish municipalities hosting offshore wind receive substantial fiscal compensation, with studies showing ~30% local approval increase. Sweden's HD03239 adopts a similar principle but focuses on onshore revenue sharing. **Lesson**: Denmark's early adoption shows the policy works at reducing local opposition; Sweden's implementation timing (pre-election) accelerates the political benefit timeline.
 
-### Finland — Parallel Fiscal Austerity Narrative
+#### Finland — Parallel Fiscal Austerity Narrative
 Finland entered fiscal consolidation in 2024 under PM Orpo (Kokoomus-led coalition), implementing spending cuts and tax increases. Sweden's Tidö government has avoided Finnish-scale austerity, but both face the same political challenge: structural deficits require consolidation while recession constrains household spending. Finland's experience shows that consolidation with strong rule-of-law reform can maintain coalition stability. **Sweden comparison**: Sweden's spring budget is less austere than Finland's; the political risk is lower but the long-term fiscal trajectory raises similar questions.
 
-### Germany — Environmental Permitting Reform Comparison
+#### Germany — Environmental Permitting Reform Comparison
 Germany's Bundesimmissionsschutzgesetz (BImSchG) reform (2023) and the establishment of the Bundesnetzagentur's new fast-track permitting function parallels Sweden's HD03238 (new environmental review authority). Germany achieved a 40% reduction in wind energy permit processing time (18→11 months average) within two years of institutional reform. **Sweden comparison**: HD03238 targets similar efficiency gains. Germany's implementation shows a 12–18 month lag before measurable improvement — Sweden's new authority is unlikely to show results before the September 2026 election.
 
-### UK (post-Labour 2024) — Crime-Focused Pre-Election Delivery
+#### UK (post-Labour 2024) — Crime-Focused Pre-Election Delivery
 Labour's 2024 manifesto focused on "neighbourhood policing" and justice system reform. Sweden's HD03237 (paid police education) parallels UK's recruitment-first police strategy, though Sweden's approach is more structured. The UK experience shows that police reform announcements have a 6–12 month lag before voter impact. Sweden's announcement in April 2026 may not translate to voter perception change before September.
 
-## Nordic Horizontal Comparison: Energy Policy
+### Nordic Horizontal Comparison: Energy Policy
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -1234,14 +1210,13 @@ xychart-beta
     bar [6.5, 9.2, 7.8, 5.5]
 ```
 
-## Key Analytical Finding
+### Key Analytical Finding
 Sweden is neither the Nordic leader nor the laggard in this pre-election reform sprint. It is executing a broadly coherent centre-right reform agenda under greater political time pressure (imminent election) than comparable Nordic governments. The primary distinguishing feature is the co-occurrence of economic fragility and legislative ambition — a combination that creates higher delivery risk than in Denmark or Norway.
 
 ## Historical Parallels
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md -->
 
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md)_
-
-## Primary Parallel: Reinfeldt Alliance Government Spring Sprint 2010
+### Primary Parallel: Reinfeldt Alliance Government Spring Sprint 2010
 
 **Period**: April–June 2010 | **Similarity score**: 78/100
 
@@ -1265,7 +1240,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Lesson for 2026**: The model works if GDP data cooperates. If Q1 2026 GDP is negative, the 2010 parallel breaks down and the relevant parallel shifts to Persson 2006 (see below).
 
-## Secondary Parallel: Persson Social Democrat Government 2006 (Failure Case)
+### Secondary Parallel: Persson Social Democrat Government 2006 (Failure Case)
 
 **Period**: Spring 2006 | **Similarity score**: 42/100
 
@@ -1279,7 +1254,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Lesson for 2026**: If the unemployment rate (currently ~8–9%) does not show measurable decline before September, the Persson 2006 parallel becomes more relevant than the Reinfeldt 2010 parallel.
 
-## Tertiary Parallel: Reinfeldt Government 2014 (Narrow Majority Risk)
+### Tertiary Parallel: Reinfeldt Government 2014 (Narrow Majority Risk)
 
 **Period**: 2013–2014 | **Similarity score**: 55/100
 
@@ -1300,12 +1275,11 @@ xychart-beta
 ```
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md)_
-
-## High-Priority Reform Feasibility Assessment
+### High-Priority Reform Feasibility Assessment
 
-### 1. HD03238 — New Environmental Review Authority
+#### 1. HD03238 — New Environmental Review Authority
 **Risk rating**: HIGH delivery risk
 
 | Factor | Assessment |
@@ -1319,7 +1293,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Feasibility score**: 4/10 for 2026 delivery, 7/10 for 2027 implementation
 **Key constraint**: Institution-building cannot be accelerated beyond recruitment capacity
 
-### 2. HD03240 — Electricity System Laws
+#### 2. HD03240 — Electricity System Laws
 **Risk rating**: MEDIUM delivery risk
 
 | Factor | Assessment |
@@ -1333,7 +1307,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Feasibility score**: 7/10 for 2027 delivery
 **Key constraint**: Industry stakeholder alignment (Energiföretagen, Vattenfall) required for implementation rules
 
-### 3. HD03237 — Paid Police Education
+#### 3. HD03237 — Paid Police Education
 **Risk rating**: LOW delivery risk
 
 | Factor | Assessment |
@@ -1347,7 +1321,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 **Feasibility score**: 8/10 for 2027 delivery
 **Key constraint**: Physical capacity of Polishögskolan campuses; may require new facility investment
 
-### 4. HD03239 — Wind Revenue Municipality Sharing
+#### 4. HD03239 — Wind Revenue Municipality Sharing
 **Risk rating**: LOW-MEDIUM delivery risk
 
 | Factor | Assessment |
@@ -1360,7 +1334,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 
 **Feasibility score**: 7/10
 
-### 5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice Reform
+#### 5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice Reform
 **Risk rating**: MEDIUM delivery risk
 
 | Factor | Assessment |
@@ -1383,16 +1357,15 @@ xychart-beta
 ```
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md -->
 
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md)_
-
-## ACH Matrix
+### ACH Matrix
 
 Three primary competing hypotheses are evaluated against the evidence base.
 
 ---
 
-## Hypothesis H1: The Legislative Sprint Is Genuine Governance Reform (Mainstream View)
+### Hypothesis H1: The Legislative Sprint Is Genuine Governance Reform (Mainstream View)
 
 **Statement**: The April 2026 legislative package represents coherent policy delivery — a government executing its mandate across multiple domains with genuine long-term reform intent, not merely election positioning.
 
@@ -1410,7 +1383,7 @@ Three primary competing hypotheses are evaluated against the evidence base.
 
 ---
 
-## Hypothesis H2: The Government Is in Pre-Election Panic Mode (Alternative View)
+### Hypothesis H2: The Government Is in Pre-Election Panic Mode (Alternative View)
 
 **Statement**: The legislative sprint reflects internal awareness that the government's economic record is weak and voters are dissatisfied, prompting a rush of visible deliverables before the summer recess closes the window for action.
 
@@ -1429,7 +1402,7 @@ Three primary competing hypotheses are evaluated against the evidence base.
 
 ---
 
-## Hypothesis H3: The Coalition Is Managing a Silent SD Ultimatum (Red Team)
+### Hypothesis H3: The Coalition Is Managing a Silent SD Ultimatum (Red Team)
 
 **Statement**: The emergency fuel/energy relief budget (HD03236) is a direct response to an SD ultimatum delivered in private — SD signalled it would abstain on the spring budget framework unless household cost relief was accelerated.
 
@@ -1449,7 +1422,7 @@ Three primary competing hypotheses are evaluated against the evidence base.
 
 ---
 
-## Rejected Hypotheses
+### Rejected Hypotheses
 
 - **H4 (Government will call early election)**: Rejected. No constitutional basis; election is September 2026 by schedule; no party has incentive for early call.
 - **H5 (Ukraine propositions will fail)**: Rejected. Cross-party consensus confirmed; H5 score 1/10.
@@ -1467,19 +1440,18 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Classification Results
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md -->
 
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md)_
-
-## 7-Dimension Classification Framework
+### 7-Dimension Classification Framework
 
-### Dimension 1: Policy Domain
+#### Dimension 1: Policy Domain
 - **Primary**: Economic/Fiscal Policy (HD03100, HD03236, HD0399, HD03253)
 - **Secondary**: Criminal Justice (HD03246, HD03237, HD03252)
 - **Tertiary**: Energy/Environment (HD03240, HD03238, HD03239, HD03242)
 - **Quaternary**: Foreign/Security Policy (HD03231, HD03232)
 - **Quinary**: Social/Welfare (HD03245, HD03244)
 
-### Dimension 2: Political Alignment
+#### Dimension 2: Political Alignment
 | Block | Propositions Favoured | Opposition Focus |
 |-------|----------------------|-----------------|
 | M/KD/L (Alliansen) | Justice reform, deregulation (HD03242), fiscal framework | Fiscal sufficiency questions |
@@ -1489,34 +1461,34 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | V | All relief inadequate; demand wealth redistribution | HD03252, HD03246 (rights concerns) |
 | C | Support deregulation (HD03242), rural infrastructure | Mixed on justice |
 
-### Dimension 3: Constitutional/Legal Sensitivity
+#### Dimension 3: Constitutional/Legal Sensitivity
 - **High**: HD03246 (juvenile rights, ECHR Art. 6), HD03252 (welfare state principles)
 - **Medium**: HD03238 (administrative law restructuring), HD03240 (electricity market regulation)
 - **Low**: HD03231, HD03232 (treaty accession, straightforward ratification)
 
-### Dimension 4: EU/International Compliance
+#### Dimension 4: EU/International Compliance
 - HD03253 (EU Banking Package): mandatory EU transposition
 - HD03244 (Interoperability): EU Data Act compliance
 - HD03238 (Environmental review): EU EIA Directive implications
 - HD03231, HD03232: UN/EU rule-of-law architecture
 
-### Dimension 5: Electoral Salience (5 months to election)
+#### Dimension 5: Electoral Salience (5 months to election)
 - **Maximum salience**: HD03236 (fuel/energy cost), HD03100 (economic direction), HD03237 (police), HD03246 (crime)
 - **Moderate salience**: HD03239 (rural energy), HD03238 (permitting speed), HD03242 (forestry)
 - **Low salience**: HD03253, HD03244, HD03256 (technical)
 
-### Dimension 6: Implementation Complexity
+#### Dimension 6: Implementation Complexity
 - **Complex (18+ months)**: HD03238 (new authority establishment), HD03240 (electricity system overhaul)
 - **Medium (6–18 months)**: HD03237 (education funding system), HD03239 (revenue distribution mechanism)
 - **Simple (<6 months)**: HD03236 (tax change), HD03252 (legal restriction), HD03231/232 (treaty ratification)
 
-### Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR/ISMS)
+#### Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR/ISMS)
 - All documents: PUBLIC data [PUBLIC classification]
 - Source: data.riksdagen.se (Offentlighetsprincipen applies)
 - GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made; Art. 9(2)(g) substantial public interest
 - No DPIA required; no personal data processed
 
-## Priority Tiers
+### Priority Tiers
 
 | Tier | Documents | Monitoring frequency |
 |------|-----------|----------------------|
@@ -1538,17 +1510,16 @@ pie title Policy Domain Distribution — May 2026 Propositions
 ```
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis** | **Date**: 2026-04-25
 
-## Sibling Analysis Folders (Tier-C Requirement)
+### Sibling Analysis Folders (Tier-C Requirement)
 
 - **Primary sibling**: `analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/` — all 23 artifacts present; same-day companion analysis covering full April 2026 review period
 - This month-ahead analysis MUST be read in conjunction with the monthly-review folder for a complete intelligence picture
 
-## Cross-Reference with Monthly-Review
+### Cross-Reference with Monthly-Review
 
 | Theme | Monthly-Review Assessment | Month-Ahead Forward Projection | Convergence |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -1557,29 +1528,29 @@ _Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/bl
 | Economic recovery | April GDP context | Q1 GDP release is PIR-1 for May | ✅ Continuous |
 | Ukraine instruments | April foreign policy review | HD03231/232 ratification expected May | ✅ Consistent |
 
-## Legislative Cross-Reference: Document Clusters
+### Legislative Cross-Reference: Document Clusters
 
-### Energy Policy Legislative Chain
+#### Energy Policy Legislative Chain
 - HD03240 → Electricity System Laws → links to HD03239 (wind revenue) → links to HD03238 (env authority)
 - These three form an integrated energy infrastructure reform package; amendments to one will likely affect the others
 - See significance-scoring.md: HD03240 (DIW 9/10), HD03239 (DIW 7/10), HD03238 (DIW 6/10)
 
-### Security and Justice Legislative Chain
+#### Security and Justice Legislative Chain
 - HD03237 (paid police education) → HD03246 (juvenile justice) → HD03252 (detention conditions)
 - These form a "rule of law sprint" addressing the full crime-policing chain
 - See stakeholder-perspectives.md: SD and M share leadership on this chain; KD provides credibility
 
-### Budget and Fiscal Chain
+#### Budget and Fiscal Chain
 - HD03100 (Vårpropositionen 2026) → HD03236 (emergency ändringsbudget) → HD0399 (spring amendment)
 - HD03100 is the macro framework; HD03236 is the SD-facing concession layer; HD0399 provides legislative basis
 - Fiscal coherence: these three must be read together; surface contradictions between HD03100 macro-targets and HD03236 fiscal cost
 
-### International Commitments Chain
+#### International Commitments Chain
 - HD03231 (Ukraine tribunal accession) → HD03232 (Ukraine compensation commission) → HD03234 (Europol protocol)
 - Aligns Sweden's international legal posture post-NATO; all three have near-zero domestic opposition
 - Cross-reference: monthly-review covers the diplomatic context of these commitments
 
-## Policy Cluster Map
+### Policy Cluster Map
 
 ```mermaid
 %%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
@@ -1610,7 +1581,7 @@ flowchart TD
     style UKT fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
 ```
 
-## Analysis Artifact Cross-References
+### Analysis Artifact Cross-References
 
 | Artifact | Key Link | Forward Reference |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -1621,83 +1592,82 @@ flowchart TD
 | swot-analysis.md | All 4 quadrants cite dok_ids | Feeds significance-scoring.md ranking |
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Date**: 2026-04-25 | **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Review type**: AI FIRST Pass 2 retrospective
 
-## §ICD 203 Audit
+### §ICD 203 Audit
 
-### Standard 1 — Proper Disclaimer
+#### Standard 1 — Proper Disclaimer
 Analytical judgments in this report reflect the analyst's assessment and do not represent official government positions. Confidence levels follow the Intelligence Community Directive 203 and Admiralty Code.
 
-### Standard 2 — Source Summary
+#### Standard 2 — Source Summary
 Primary sources: Riksdagen API (riksdag-regering MCP), doktyp `prop`, riksmöte 2025/26. 20 primary legislative documents downloaded. MCP health: live. No external intelligence sources. Economic context from HC01FiU20/FiU24 [riksdagen.se] committee reports. No classified, hacked, or private data used.
 
-### Standard 3 — Uncertainties
+#### Standard 3 — Uncertainties
 - Economic GDP trajectory: LOW confidence on precise Q1 2026 figure (no SCB release yet)
 - SD internal deliberations: no primary source; inferred from public statements and structural incentives
 - German/Danish comparator GDP figures: approximate, based on IMF WEO Apr-2026 context [Admiralty C2]
 - Media framing data: no systematic media monitoring; qualitative assessment only
 
-### Standard 4 — Distinguished Analysis from Intelligence
+#### Standard 4 — Distinguished Analysis from Intelligence
 All 5 Key Judgments in intelligence-assessment.md are explicitly marked as analytical assessments, not confirmed facts. The "H3: SD Ultimatum" scenario is explicitly red-teamed and marked unprovable.
 
-### Standard 5 — Analyst Identity
+#### Standard 5 — Analyst Identity
 All analysis attributed to: James Pether Sörling, Riksdagsmonitor. No anonymous claims. AI-assisted analysis subject to human review per Hack23 AI Policy.
 
-### Standard 6 — Analytical Assumptions
+#### Standard 6 — Analytical Assumptions
 Explicitly documented in intelligence-assessment.md (Key Assumptions Check table). Four assumptions identified, with sensitivity ratings.
 
-### Standard 7 — Context for Dissemination
+#### Standard 7 — Context for Dissemination
 Public intelligence product. GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)/(g) lawful basis for political opinion references. All politicians named are in public roles performing official functions.
 
-### Standard 8 — Analytic Terminology
+#### Standard 8 — Analytic Terminology
 WEP terms used: "Very likely", "Likely", "Roughly even", "Unlikely" — drawn from canon in political-style-guide.md. Admirable Code ratings [A-F][1-6] applied in evidence tables. Banned term "probable" not used.
 
-### Standard 9 — Calibration
+#### Standard 9 — Calibration
 Scenario probabilities sum to 100% (25+45+20+10). Key Judgments paired with specific PIR triggers. One scenario (Scenario D, 10%) explicitly assigned as low-probability catastrophic risk.
 
 ---
 
-## Named Methodology Improvements (Pass 2)
+### Named Methodology Improvements (Pass 2)
 
-### Improvement 1 — Economic Data Depth
+#### Improvement 1 — Economic Data Depth
 **Gap identified**: This analysis relies on HC01FiU20 committee reports for economic context rather than direct IMF WEO data. The IMF CLI (`scripts/imf-fetch.ts`) should have been invoked.
 
 **Action taken in Pass 2**: Economic data assertions in executive-brief.md and stakeholder-perspectives.md strengthened with explicit vintage notation. Full IMF data call deferred due to session time pressure but piped Admiralty rating downgraded for unverified figures from [B2] to [C2].
 
 **Future improvement**: Next month-ahead run should call `npx tsx scripts/imf-fetch.ts weo --country SWE --indicator NGDP_RPCH --years 5 --persist` at the start of the data download phase, before legislative document analysis.
 
-### Improvement 2 — SD Internal Deliberation Evidence Gap
+#### Improvement 2 — SD Internal Deliberation Evidence Gap
 **Gap identified**: The H3 (SD Ultimatum) hypothesis in devils-advocate.md is structurally sound but lacks primary evidence (speech text, formal declaration, or interview). The Riksdag anföranden search (`search_anforanden`) for SD spokesperson statements was not executed.
 
 **Action taken in Pass 2**: H3 was explicitly marked as unprovable and given 5/10 certainty score. The hypothesis is preserved as a RED TEAM contribution rather than a key finding.
 
 **Future improvement**: Run `search_anforanden({parti: "SD", rm: "2025/26", text: "drivmedel OR bränsleskatt"})` before concluding devils-advocate analysis.
 
-### Improvement 3 — Media Framing Systematic Monitoring
+#### Improvement 3 — Media Framing Systematic Monitoring
 **Gap identified**: media-framing-analysis.md relies on qualitative assessment. No systematic corpus of media headlines was gathered using the news archive tools or web fetch.
 
 **Action taken in Pass 2**: All media claims in media-framing-analysis.md are hedged with "qualitative assessment only — no systematic media corpus" qualifier.
 
 **Future improvement**: Implement a 10-headline sample per major document using web_fetch from Riksdagen press page before writing media-framing section.
 
-### Improvement 4 — Family D Electoral Analysis Depth
+#### Improvement 4 — Family D Electoral Analysis Depth
 **Gap identified**: Family D files (election-2026-analysis, coalition-mathematics, voter-segmentation) could not access current polling data. All seat projections are based on last known SCB/Sifo polling.
 
 **Action taken in Pass 2**: All seat projections explicitly marked with "(2026-Q1 estimate; no new polling data in this run)".
 
 **Future improvement**: SCB Statsborgen or direct fetch of Novus/Sifo tracking poll pages via web_fetch at start of each month-ahead run.
 
-### Improvement 5 — Tier-C Cross-Reference Depth
+#### Improvement 5 — Tier-C Cross-Reference Depth
 **Gap identified**: cross-reference-map.md cites sibling monthly-review folder but does not perform deep content-level comparison. The two analyses were produced independently.
 
 **Action taken in Pass 2**: Added explicit note in cross-reference-map.md that full synthesis required reading both analyses jointly.
 
 **Future improvement**: Month-ahead workflows should read the executive-brief.md from the same-day monthly-review folder before starting analysis, to identify and integrate overlapping assessment.
 
-## SAT Techniques Attested
+### SAT Techniques Attested
 
 | Technique | Applied In |
 |---|---|
@@ -1718,10 +1688,9 @@ Scenario probabilities sum to 100% (25+45+20+10). Key Judgments paired with spec
 Total named SAT techniques: **13** (meets ≥10 requirement)
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md)_
-
-## Workflow Metadata
+### Workflow Metadata
 - **Workflow**: news-month-ahead
 - **Run ID**: 24933129778
 - **UTC Timestamp**: 2026-04-25T14:35:00Z
@@ -1730,10 +1699,10 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 - **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
 - **MCP Server**: riksdag-regering (live, HTTP)
 
-## MCP Health
+### MCP Health
 - `get_sync_status` → `{"status":"live"}` on first attempt. No retries needed.
 
-## Documents Downloaded
+### Documents Downloaded
 
 | dok_id | Title | Type | Organ | Date | Full-text | Admiralty |
 |--------|-------|------|-------|------|-----------|-----------|
@@ -1758,15 +1727,51 @@ _Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | HD03239 | Vindkraft i kommuner | prop | Klimat/Näringsliv | 2026-04-14 | available | A1 |
 | HD03104 | Utvärdering statens upplåning 2021-2025 | skr | Finansdepartementet | 2026-04-23 | available | B2 |
 
-## Sibling Analysis Folders Read (Tier-C Cross-type Synthesis)
+### Sibling Analysis Folders Read (Tier-C Cross-type Synthesis)
 - `analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/` — Today's monthly review (all 23 artifacts present)
 
-## Cross-Source Enrichment
+### Cross-Source Enrichment
 - **Statskontoret**: No specific agency-capacity source found for direct May 2026 implementation issues. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) will warrant Statskontoret follow-up once established.
 - **SCB**: Riksbank monetary policy evaluation data available from 2024 (KPIF 1.9% average 2024, GDP +1.0% 2024)
 - **IMF**: WEO Apr-2026 projections consulted for Swedish macroeconomic context
 
-## Notes
+### Notes
 - Calendar API returned HTML (known API issue). Calendar data obtained through document analysis.
 - Total documents: 20 propositions/skrivelser
 - Full-text available but not fetched given time constraints; summary/snippet level sufficient
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03100-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03231-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03236-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03237-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03238-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03239-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03240-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD03246-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/article.md b/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/article.md
index a01e52fa4d..d273bf5261 100644
--- a/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/article.md
+++ b/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/article.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date: 2026-04-25
 subfolder: monthly-review
 slug: 2026-04-25-monthly-review
 source_folder: analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review
-generated_at: 2026-04-25T13:40:32.732Z
+generated_at: 2026-04-25T15:36:04.749Z
 language: en
 layout: article
 ---
@@ -26,37 +26,36 @@ Use this guide to read the article as a political-intelligence product rather th
 | [Audit appendix](#rm-classification-results) | classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers | appendix artifacts |
 
 ## Executive Brief
-
-_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md)_
+<!-- source: executive-brief.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md -->
 
 **Classification**: PUBLIC | **Analyst**: James Pether Sörling | **Date**: 2026-04-25
 **Confidence**: HIGH [A1] | **Days to Election**: ~141 | **Window**: 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25
 
 ---
 
-## BLUF
+### BLUF
 
 Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) **completing its pre-election regulatory portfolio**. The April 24 committee batch — **HD01JuU10 (new firearms law), HD01JuU31 (police-reform follow-up), HD01SoU25 (elderly-care reinforcement), HD01CU24 (construction-process efficiency)** — clamps the regulatory closure on top of the April 22 fiscal climax (HD01FiU48 fuel-tax relief, M+SD+S+KD supermajority) [riksdagen.se]. Healthcare and crime remain the dominant *electoral* wedges; opposition interpellation traffic (HD10448 wind-power disinformation, HD11747 work-environment subsidies, HD11749 rights-of-detained children, HD11748 consular-protection in Burundi) shows S/V/MP running a **disciplined three-track narrative** while **SD has filed zero counter-motions** against the four April-24 committee reports — a structural-confidence signal that has now persisted for 18 consecutive sitting days.
 
 ---
 
-## 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
+### 3 Decisions This Brief Supports
 
-### Decision 1: Pre-election delivery confidence assessment
+#### Decision 1: Pre-election delivery confidence assessment
 
 The Tidö coalition has now passed its **complete declared 2025/26 legislative portfolio** in the four core domains — fiscal (HD03100/HD0399), energy (HD03240/HD03238/HD03239), security/defence (UFöU3/HD03214/HD03228), and criminal-justice/welfare (HD01JuU10/HD01JuU31/HD01SoU25) — within 141 days of the September 2026 election. Implementation, not legislation, is now the binding risk. **Recommendation**: pivot monitoring to *implementation feasibility* (Polismyndigheten capacity post-RiR 2026:6, Miljöprövningsmyndigheten permit throughput, Försäkringskassan elderly-care administrative load).
 
-### Decision 2: Healthcare-and-crime wedge probability
+#### Decision 2: Healthcare-and-crime wedge probability
 
 The opposition has *not* succeeded in fracturing the coalition on its primary attack surfaces: SfU18's 39 reservations did not flip a single vote; SD-KD healthcare split on SoU17 R15 was contained. The HD01JuU10 firearms law and HD01JuU31 police-reform audit both pass with M+SD+KD+L unity. **Recommendation**: investors and stakeholders should treat the welfare/security legislation as *durable through September 2026*; opposition wedge messaging will dominate but legislative reversal probability is LOW (≤ 25%).
 
-### Decision 3: Pre-campaign opposition narrative architecture
+#### Decision 3: Pre-campaign opposition narrative architecture
 
 Three opposition wedges crystallised in April: (a) economic — drivmedel/SME-sjuklön (S, HD024082, HD10447); (b) environmental-disinformation — HD10448; (c) rights-of-the-detained / migrant minors / consular protection (V/MP, HD11749, HD11748). **Recommendation**: communicators preparing for the late-summer campaign should expect the disinformation frame (HD10448) to expand into a coalition stress-test for SD specifically; the rights-of-detained frame (HD11749) is V's primary post-prison-expansion attack vector.
 
 ---
 
-## 60-Second Read
+### 60-Second Read
 
 - 🔴 **April 24 committee batch closes regulatory portfolio** — HD01JuU10 + HD01JuU31 + HD01SoU25 + HD01CU24 — pre-election delivery on schedule
 - 🔴 **April 22 supermajority** (HD01FiU48, M+SD+S+KD): S could not oppose 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax relief 141 days before election
@@ -69,13 +68,13 @@ Three opposition wedges crystallised in April: (a) economic — drivmedel/SME-sj
 
 ---
 
-## Top Forward Trigger
+### Top Forward Trigger
 
 **Monitor**: First post-April-24 SOM Institute or Demoskop opinion poll. If S regains > 28% headline support despite the April 22 fuel-tax-relief vote, S's "symbolic opposition + practical support" message has held under stress and the September election remains a structural toss-up. If S lags below 26%, the M+KD+L bloc's pre-election positioning has demonstrably converted. **Trigger date**: 2026-05-08 ± 5 days (next Demoskop monthly).
 
 ---
 
-## Confidence Distribution
+### Confidence Distribution
 
 | Confidence | KJs | Basis |
 |------------|-----|-------|
@@ -100,8 +99,7 @@ flowchart TD
 ```
 
 ## Synthesis Summary
-
-_Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md)_
+<!-- source: synthesis-summary.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling · **Confidence**: HIGH (A1) · **Mode**: Tier-C monthly aggregation
 **Window**: 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25 (30 days) · **Riksmöte**: 2025/26
@@ -109,11 +107,11 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 **Documents analysed**: 8 primary (April 24 closure batch) + 13 sibling synthesis references in window
 **Days to Election 2026**: 141 (target 2026-09-13)
 
-## Lead story (decision-grade)
+### Lead story (decision-grade)
 
 > The 30-day window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25 closes Sweden's **most consequential pre-election parliamentary month** of riksmöte 2025/26. The Kristersson government has now legislated the entirety of its declared 2025/26 portfolio across four domains: **fiscal pivot** (HD03100 spring proposition + HD0399 spring-amending budget + HD01FiU48 emergency fuel-tax relief, the latter passing 2026-04-22 with an extraordinary M+SD+**S**+KD supermajority), **energy transformation triptych** (HD03240 / HD03238 / HD03239), **security and defence cluster** (UFöU3 NATO eFP Finland deployment + HD03214 cybersecurity centre + HD03228 war-materiel reform), and the **April 24 closure batch** of four committee reports — HD01JuU10 (ny vapenlag), HD01JuU31 (Polisreformen 2015 RiR-uppföljning), HD01SoU25 (äldreomsorg + anhörigstöd), HD01CU24 (effektiv och säker byggprocess). The opposition's parliamentary firepower in the closing week (HD10448 wind-power desinformation; HD11747 lönestöd vs arbetsmiljö; HD11748 Sahabo/Burundi; HD11749 children's right to schooling in custody) signals a clean S–V–MP division of labour entering the 18-week pre-campaign. SD continues to file **zero counter-motions** against open government bills — an 18-day structural-confidence streak.
 
-## DIW-weighted ranking (top 10, this window)
+### DIW-weighted ranking (top 10, this window)
 
 | Rank | dok_id | Type | DIW | Theme | Admiralty | Source |
 |------|--------|------|-----|-------|-----------|--------|
@@ -130,9 +128,9 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 
 **Sensitivity**: Under ±1 DIW tier perturbation the top-3 set is robust. HD01SoU25 ↔ HD01JuU10 swap order possible if pre-campaign issue salience tilts crime-ward; HD01JuU31's *implementation* weight (Polismyndigheten capacity) gives it the largest forward-leverage among the April-24 batch.
 
-## Integrated intelligence picture
+### Integrated intelligence picture
 
-### Thematic convergence — five threads
+#### Thematic convergence — five threads
 
 1. **Fiscal-electoral pivot** (HD03100, HD0399, HD01FiU48). The 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax-relief vote (M+SD+S+KD) on 2026-04-22 is the political signature of the month: S's inability to oppose direct household relief 141 days before the election is the single largest *measured* opposition constraint of the riksmöte.
 2. **Energy transformation** (HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239). The triptych passes by April 13–22; the April-24 wind-power disinformation interpellation (HD10448) is *post hoc* opposition counter-framing, not legislative obstruction.
@@ -140,7 +138,7 @@ _Source: [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob
 4. **Criminal-justice / welfare closure** — *the April-24 batch*. HD01JuU10 (vapenlag) + HD01JuU31 (RiR-uppföljning) modernise crime regulation; HD01SoU25 strengthens elderly-care delivery; HD01CU24 reduces handling time in construction permitting. Together they fill the pre-election regulatory ledger.
 5. **Opposition wedge architecture** — S/V/MP three-track. Economic (HD024082, HD10447), environmental-information (HD10448), rights-of-detained / consular (HD11748, HD11749). C remains procedural-only.
 
-### Cross-type signals (Tier-C synthesis)
+#### Cross-type signals (Tier-C synthesis)
 
 - **Prop → Motion → Bet → Ip pipeline** is fully visible across the window: HD03100/0399 (fiscal prop) → HD024082 (S counter-motion) → HD01FiU48 (committee → vote) → HD10447 (S interpellation on SME sjuklön).
 - **Implementation pivot** is the dominant new trend: HD01JuU31 (RiR Polisreformen) recasts criminal-justice debate from *legislation* to *capacity*; HD11747 (lönestöd vs farlig arbetsmiljö) raises the same theme on labour side.
@@ -169,31 +167,30 @@ flowchart TB
   style F3 stroke-width:3px
 ```
 
-## Confidence statement
+### Confidence statement
 
 Overall analytic confidence is **HIGH (A1)** for the structural picture (delivery complete, opposition wedge taxonomy stable, SD discipline visible). Confidence is **MEDIUM (B2)** for forward-poll dynamics (single-source dependence on Demoskop / SOM-lag) and for the precise *implementation* trajectory of HD01JuU31 (RiR 2026:6 contains 9 open recommendations, none yet closed).
 
-## Open PIRs carried forward
+### Open PIRs carried forward
 
 - **PIR-1**: Will the M+KD+L bloc convert HD01FiU48 to durable polling lift by 2026-06-01? (carried from 2026-04-23 monthly review)
 - **PIR-2**: Does HD01JuU31's audit produce a Polismyndigheten reorganisation announcement before 2026-08-31?
 - **PIR-3**: Will SD's zero-counter-motion discipline survive the September manifesto launch window?
 
 ## Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments
-
-_Source: [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: intelligence-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Issuing officer**: Pether Sörling, Analyst-of-record
 **Date**: 2026-04-25 | **Sourcing**: A1–C3 Admiralty range
 **Standards**: ICD 203 (Analytic Standards) compliance asserted
 
-## Bottom Line Up Front
+### Bottom Line Up Front
 
 Sweden's Tidö coalition (M-SD-KD-L) has, within the 30-day window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25, **committed and structurally locked-in** its declared 2025/26 legislative portfolio across all four core domains (fiscal, energy, security/defence, criminal-justice/welfare). The April-24 closure batch (HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24) completes the regulatory ledger. The strategic decision-relevant pivot is from *legislation* to *implementation*, with Polismyndigheten capacity (RiR 2026:6) the most binding constraint and healthcare-financing the most exposed wedge.
 
-## Key Judgments
+### Key Judgments
 
-### Key Judgment KJ-1 — Legislative completion
+#### Key Judgment KJ-1 — Legislative completion
 
 **We assess with HIGH confidence** that the Tidö coalition has committed its declared 2025/26 portfolio in all four domains. The April-24 batch is structurally locked-in even where formal chamber votes are scheduled May, given the 2025/26 confidence-coalition >97% committee-to-chamber conversion rate.
 
@@ -201,7 +198,7 @@ Sweden's Tidö coalition (M-SD-KD-L) has, within the 30-day window 2026-03-26 
 - **Confidence**: **HIGH** (multi-source, internally consistent, robust to red-team H1)
 - **Admiralty**: A2
 
-### Key Judgment KJ-2 — Wedge effectiveness LOW; implementation risk HIGH
+#### Key Judgment KJ-2 — Wedge effectiveness LOW; implementation risk HIGH
 
 **We assess with HIGH confidence** that opposition wedge architecture (S/V/MP three-track) will not produce *legislative reversals* in the 141-day pre-election window. **We assess with MEDIUM confidence** that implementation friction (R-2 police capacity, R-1 healthcare financing, R-6 construction throughput) will produce *politically displaced* outcomes that opposition can exploit narratively.
 
@@ -209,7 +206,7 @@ Sweden's Tidö coalition (M-SD-KD-L) has, within the 30-day window 2026-03-26 
 - **Confidence**: **HIGH** for legislative claim; **MEDIUM** for implementation pathway (single-source on Polismyndigheten timeline)
 - **Admiralty**: B2
 
-### Key Judgment KJ-3 — Pre-campaign architecture stable through July; uncertain June 15+
+#### Key Judgment KJ-3 — Pre-campaign architecture stable through July; uncertain June 15+
 
 **We assess with MEDIUM confidence** that SD's structural discipline (18-day zero-counter-motion streak) is durable through May–early June, but uncertain after the formal pre-campaign window opens (~June 15). Past cycles (2018, 2022) show SD pivot in final 12 weeks.
 
@@ -217,16 +214,16 @@ Sweden's Tidö coalition (M-SD-KD-L) has, within the 30-day window 2026-03-26 
 - **Confidence**: **MEDIUM** (calibrated downward by H2)
 - **Admiralty**: B3
 
-## Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)
+### Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)
 
-### Open PIRs (this cycle)
+#### Open PIRs (this cycle)
 
 - **PIR-A**: Will M+KD+L bloc reach Demoskop ≥ 44% by 2026-07-01? (decision-relevant: Scenario A vs B)
 - **PIR-B**: Does HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 produce a Polismyndigheten reorganisation announcement by 2026-08-31?
 - **PIR-C**: Does SD discipline survive to manifesto launch (~2026-08-15)?
 - **PIR-D**: Does the wind-power disinfo frame (HD10448) escalate to a SOM-Institut salience peak by 2026-06-30?
 
-### Prior-cycle PIRs — carried forward from 2026-04-23 monthly review
+#### Prior-cycle PIRs — carried forward from 2026-04-23 monthly review
 
 - **PIR carried**: ✅ "Will HD01FiU48 receive a chamber vote before April 25?" — *Closed:* YES, 2026-04-22 supermajoritet documented
 - **PIR carried (open)**: 🟡 "Will the M-KD-L bloc convert HD01FiU48 into durable polling lift by 2026-06-01?" — *Still open* (renamed PIR-A above)
@@ -236,7 +233,7 @@ Sweden's Tidö coalition (M-SD-KD-L) has, within the 30-day window 2026-03-26 
 
 The prior-cycle PIR ledger is maintained in `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md` for full audit lineage.
 
-## Confidence summary
+### Confidence summary
 
 | KJ | Confidence | Admiralty | Drivers |
 |----|------------|-----------|---------|
@@ -244,7 +241,7 @@ The prior-cycle PIR ledger is maintained in `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-r
 | KJ-2 | HIGH (legislative) / MEDIUM (impl) | B2 | Implementation pathway single-source |
 | KJ-3 | MEDIUM | B3 | Historical base rate uncertainty |
 
-## ICD 203 self-attestation
+### ICD 203 self-attestation
 
 This product:
 - (a) Is **independent of political consideration** — analyst attests no advisory role with any party.
@@ -253,17 +250,16 @@ This product:
 - (d) Has been **stress-tested** via devils-advocate.md (4 hypotheses).
 
 ## Significance Scoring
-
-_Source: [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md)_
+<!-- source: significance-scoring.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1) | **Mode**: DIW (Decision-Impact Weighting)
 
-## Methodology
+### Methodology
 
 DIW = 0.30·Decisional Salience + 0.25·Reach + 0.20·Reversibility + 0.15·Time-to-Effect + 0.10·Evidence Strength.
 Tier-C monthly multiplier 1.5× applied to base scores; ceiling 4.50.
 
-## Top-10 ranked items (this 30-day window)
+### Top-10 ranked items (this 30-day window)
 
 | Rank | dok_id | DIW | DS | R | Rev | TTE | ES | Theme | Source |
 |------|--------|-----|----|---|----|----|----|-------|--------|
@@ -278,7 +274,7 @@ Tier-C monthly multiplier 1.5× applied to base scores; ceiling 4.50.
 | 9 | HD10448 | 2.95 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | Desinformation om vindkraft (Ip) | primary HD10448 |
 | 10 | HD11749 | 2.55 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | Utbildning för barn i kriminalvård | primary HD11749 |
 
-## Scoring rationale
+### Scoring rationale
 
 - **HD01FiU48** retains top rank from prior window: M+SD+S+KD supermajority is the single hardest-to-reverse pre-election fiscal commitment of riksmöte 2025/26.
 - **HD01SoU25** scores 3.60 because elderly-care + carer support is both an electoral salience peak (SOM 2025: omsorg #1 issue) and structurally sticky (kommunalt åtagande, full-cycle implementation > 18 months) [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25].
@@ -317,15 +313,14 @@ flowchart LR
   style H stroke-width:2px
 ```
 
-## Sensitivity analysis
+### Sensitivity analysis
 
 Removing HD01JuU31 (lowest-confidence in committee tier) leaves top-3 unchanged. Adding +0.5 DIW to all April-24 batch items (counterfactual: opposition-led media salience) does not change top-3 rank.
 
 ## Media Framing Analysis
+<!-- source: media-framing-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md -->
 
-_Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md)_
-
-## Frame inventory (this window)
+### Frame inventory (this window)
 
 | Frame | Owner | Hot dok_ids | Audience |
 |-------|-------|-------------|----------|
@@ -339,7 +334,7 @@ _Source: [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | "Rättigheter / mänskliga rättigheter" | V+MP | HD11748, HD11749 | Yngre, akademiker |
 | "Arbetsmiljö och stöd" | S | HD11747 | LO-väljare |
 
-## Frame contest matrix
+### Frame contest matrix
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -357,19 +352,19 @@ quadrantChart
   Arbetsmiljö: [0.45, 0.2]
 ```
 
-## Pre-campaign salience forecast (2026-09-13 horizon)
+### Pre-campaign salience forecast (2026-09-13 horizon)
 
 - **Trygghet** likely peaks August (HD01JuU10 ikraftträdande Q3) → high benefit to M+SD.
 - **Anhörig + äldreomsorg** likely peaks early summer (HD01SoU25 implementation) → KD core.
 - **Polisens kapacitet** is the *opposition's* peak frame; depends on RiR-uppföljning and any incidents.
 - **Desinformation** uncertain; H3 (devils-advocate) implies the frame is double-edged for SD. [riksdagen.se HD10448]
 
-## Notable absences
+### Notable absences
 
 - C is largely *off* the framing map this window — neither owner nor amplifier of major frames.
 - L's media framing is tied to M; insufficient stand-alone identity in window.
 
-## Frame ownership network
+### Frame ownership network
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -386,13 +381,12 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Stakeholder Perspectives
-
-_Source: [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)_
+<!-- source: stakeholder-perspectives.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Lens**: 6-stakeholder map — government parties, opposition parties, agencies, kommuner, media, väljargrupper
 
-## Stakeholder map
+### Stakeholder map
 
 | Stakeholder | Position | Key documents (window) | Interest | Influence |
 |-------------|----------|------------------------|----------|-----------|
@@ -439,7 +433,7 @@ flowchart LR
   style G stroke-width:3px
 ```
 
-## Cross-stakeholder dynamics
+### Cross-stakeholder dynamics
 
 - **Government–SD**: closure-batch unanimity confirms confidence relationship through pre-campaign.
 - **S–government**: HD01FiU48 reveals tactical complexity — S supports popular pieces while attacking adjacent themes.
@@ -447,13 +441,12 @@ flowchart LR
 - **Kommuner + Försäkringskassan**: HD01SoU25 + HD01CU24 both rely on kommunal kapacitet — overlap creates implementation risk.
 
 ## Forward Indicators
-
-_Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md)_
+<!-- source: forward-indicators.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Window**: 2026-04-26 → 2026-09-13 (election day)
 
-## Dated indicator ledger (≥10)
+### Dated indicator ledger (≥10)
 
 | Date | Indicator | Decision relevance | Source |
 |------|-----------|---------------------|--------|
@@ -474,7 +467,7 @@ _Source: [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blo
 | 2026-08-31 | Polismyndigheten reorg-meddelande window close | PIR-B | HD01JuU31 |
 | 2026-09-13 | Election day | terminal | calendar |
 
-## Indicator dependencies
+### Indicator dependencies
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -493,7 +486,7 @@ flowchart LR
   style D8 stroke-width:3px
 ```
 
-## Indicator ranks by decision-leverage
+### Indicator ranks by decision-leverage
 
 | Rank | Indicator | Why it matters most |
 |------|-----------|---------------------|
@@ -505,17 +498,16 @@ flowchart LR
 [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48] [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]
 
 ## Scenario Analysis
-
-_Source: [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: scenario-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Method**: Three-scenario cone + sensitivity ladder; 141-day horizon to 2026-09-13
 
-## Baseline anchor
+### Baseline anchor
 
 Tidö delivers complete legislative portfolio (HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, April-24 batch) with HD01FiU48 supermajority capping the fiscal pivot. Implementation pivot (HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD01CU24) is now the binding constraint. Opposition has tactical capture but no legislative reversals.
 
-## Scenario A — *Delivery-Lock* (probability 0.45)
+### Scenario A — *Delivery-Lock* (probability 0.45)
 
 > Tidö converts the legislative completeness into measurable polling lift; Demoskop shows M+KD+L bloc reaching 47% by mid-July; SD holds 18%; S stuck at 25–27%.
 
@@ -525,7 +517,7 @@ Tidö delivers complete legislative portfolio (HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, April-2
 - **Evidence base**: HD01FiU48, HD01JuU10, HD01SoU25 [riksdagen.se]
 - **Admiralty**: B2
 
-## Scenario B — *Wedge Stalemate* (probability 0.35) — most-likely
+### Scenario B — *Wedge Stalemate* (probability 0.35) — most-likely
 
 > M+KD+L bloc holds 41–43% but does not break above; S resilient at 28–30%; SD 17–19%; September election reverts to coalition-arithmetic uncertainty.
 
@@ -535,7 +527,7 @@ Tidö delivers complete legislative portfolio (HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, April-2
 - **Evidence base**: HD01SoU25 + HD01SoU17 sibling, HD11749 [riksdagen.se]
 - **Admiralty**: B2
 
-## Scenario C — *Implementation Cascade* (probability 0.15)
+### Scenario C — *Implementation Cascade* (probability 0.15)
 
 > RiR 2026:6 follow-up reveals deeper Polismyndigheten dysfunction; Brå Q2 brottsstatistik shows uptick; HD01JuU10's launch is overshadowed by capacity story; SD frustration with Polismyndigheten ledning becomes overt.
 
@@ -545,7 +537,7 @@ Tidö delivers complete legislative portfolio (HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, April-2
 - **Evidence base**: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6, sibling 2026-04-24 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]
 - **Admiralty**: C3
 
-## Scenario D — *Tail risk: Geopolitical shock* (probability 0.05)
+### Scenario D — *Tail risk: Geopolitical shock* (probability 0.05)
 
 > Russia/NATO incident or Burundi-style consular escalation reframes campaign mid-cycle; HD11748-class cases multiply.
 
@@ -553,7 +545,7 @@ Tidö delivers complete legislative portfolio (HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, April-2
 - **Evidence**: HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]
 - **Admiralty**: C4
 
-## Scenario summary
+### Scenario summary
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -570,7 +562,7 @@ quadrantChart
   D Tail Geopolitical: [0.05, 0.9]
 ```
 
-## Decision implications
+### Decision implications
 
 | Audience | Plan around | Hedge against |
 |----------|-------------|---------------|
@@ -579,12 +571,11 @@ quadrantChart
 | Policy planners | Scenario A → implementation focus | Scenario C |
 
 ## Risk Assessment
-
-_Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md)_
+<!-- source: risk-assessment.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1) | **Horizon**: April–September 2026
 
-## 5-dimension risk register
+### 5-dimension risk register
 
 | ID | Dimension | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Inherent | Mitigation | Residual | Evidence |
 |----|-----------|------|------------|--------|----------|------------|----------|----------|
@@ -597,7 +588,7 @@ _Source: [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | R-7 | Information | Lönestöd-arbetsmiljö samordningsbrist eskalerar | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | Tillväxtverket-Arbetsmiljöverket MoU | LOW | HD11747 [riksdagen.se HD11747] |
 | R-8 | Rights | V/MP-frame om barn i kriminalvård når mediegenombrott | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | Skolverket-IVO-kriminalvård gemensamt direktiv | MEDIUM | HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749] |
 
-## Heat map (likelihood × impact, residual)
+### Heat map (likelihood × impact, residual)
 
 ```mermaid
 quadrantChart
@@ -630,7 +621,7 @@ flowchart TD
   style A stroke-width:2px
 ```
 
-## Top-3 risks expanded
+### Top-3 risks expanded
 
 **R-5 (Electoral conversion)**: Most consequential — even with perfect legislative delivery, polling lift is not automatic. Demoskop/SOM lag 4–6 weeks. **Trigger date**: Demoskop 2026-05-08 ± 5 d.
 
@@ -639,20 +630,19 @@ flowchart TD
 **R-1 (Healthcare wedge)**: HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi has no dedicated funding line in HD03100 — opposition will exploit. Needs Q3 2026 amendment.
 
 ## SWOT Analysis
-
-_Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: swot-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Subject**: Tidö coalition position 141 days before September 2026 election
 
-## TOWS matrix
+### TOWS matrix
 
 | | Opportunities | Threats |
 |---|---|---|
 | **Strengths** | SO: Convert delivered portfolio (HD01FiU48 + April-24 batch) into pre-campaign frame [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48] | ST: Use SD discipline (zero counter-motions) to deflect coalition-cohesion attacks [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10] |
 | **Weaknesses** | WO: Address Polismyndigheten capacity gap with budget signal [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31] | WT: Healthcare opposition (S+V+MP+C+L division-of-labour) on SoU17/SoU25 reservations [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25] |
 
-## Strengths
+### Strengths
 
 | Item | Evidence |
 |------|----------|
@@ -662,7 +652,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | New firearms framework modernises crime regulation | HD01JuU10 — JuU vote pending May [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10] |
 | Construction-permit acceleration unlocks bostadsbyggande | HD01CU24 — civilutskottet betänkande [riksdagen.se HD01CU24] |
 
-## Weaknesses
+### Weaknesses
 
 | Item | Evidence |
 |------|----------|
@@ -671,7 +661,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Lönestöd-vs-arbetsmiljö samordning brister institutionellt | HD11747 [riksdagen.se HD11747] |
 | Konsulärt skydd har resursbegränsningar (Sahabo-fallet) | HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748] |
 
-## Opportunities
+### Opportunities
 
 | Item | Evidence |
 |------|----------|
@@ -680,7 +670,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Energy disinformation frame kan stärka SD som "common-sense"-aktör | HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448] |
 | Construction-permit reform alignerar med urban väljarskifte | HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01CU24] |
 
-## Threats
+### Threats
 
 | Item | Evidence |
 |------|----------|
@@ -689,7 +679,7 @@ _Source: [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/mai
 | Polisreform-RiR ger oppositionen kapacitetskritik | HD01JuU31 + RiR 2026:6 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31] |
 | Wind-power disinformation-frame är dubbelriktad — kan slå tillbaka mot SD | HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448] |
 
-## Visual TOWS overview
+### Visual TOWS overview
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -708,15 +698,14 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Threat Analysis
-
-_Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: threat-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Framework**: Political Threat Taxonomy (institutional, electoral, informational, implementation)
 
-## Threat register
+### Threat register
 
-### T-1: Coalition cohesion erosion (institutional)
+#### T-1: Coalition cohesion erosion (institutional)
 
 - **Vector**: SoU17 R15 (sibling) flagged SD–KD healthcare divergence; HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi could re-trigger.
 - **Likelihood**: LOW (≤25%) — SD has held discipline 18 sitting days.
@@ -725,7 +714,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Evidence**: HD01SoU25, sibling SoU17 [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]
 - **Admiralty**: B2
 
-### T-2: Implementation deficit cascade (implementation)
+#### T-2: Implementation deficit cascade (implementation)
 
 - **Vector**: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 reveals 9 open Polismyndigheten recommendations; HD01CU24 depends on kommunal kapacitet.
 - **Likelihood**: HIGH — historical base rate from prior reform cycles.
@@ -734,7 +723,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Evidence**: HD01JuU31, HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]
 - **Admiralty**: A2
 
-### T-3: Information-environment threat (informational)
+#### T-3: Information-environment threat (informational)
 
 - **Vector**: HD10448 explicitly raises wind-power disinformation as a *parliamentary* concern. The frame can be turned against any actor — including the originator.
 - **Likelihood**: MEDIUM — ongoing anti-renewable campaigns documented in Sweden since 2023.
@@ -743,7 +732,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Evidence**: HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]
 - **Admiralty**: B2
 
-### T-4: Electoral wedge effectiveness (electoral)
+#### T-4: Electoral wedge effectiveness (electoral)
 
 - **Vector**: S/V/MP three-track wedges (economic / informational / rights-of-detained) coordinate without formal coalition.
 - **Likelihood**: MEDIUM — wedge architecture is mature.
@@ -752,7 +741,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Evidence**: HD024082 sibling, HD11747, HD11748, HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749]
 - **Admiralty**: B2
 
-### T-5: Foreign-policy reputational threat (institutional / external)
+#### T-5: Foreign-policy reputational threat (institutional / external)
 
 - **Vector**: Sahabo-fallet (HD11748) — Swedish citizen detained abroad raises consular-protection capacity question.
 - **Likelihood**: LOW — single case.
@@ -760,7 +749,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 - **Evidence**: HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]
 - **Admiralty**: B3
 
-## Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping
+### Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping
 
 | Threat | Confidence | NATO ATP-2.33.4 alignment |
 |--------|------------|---------------------------|
@@ -770,7 +759,7 @@ _Source: [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/m
 | T-4 | MEDIUM | political opposition dynamics |
 | T-5 | LOW | consular / diaspora |
 
-## Threat surface diagram
+### Threat surface diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -789,260 +778,251 @@ flowchart TD
 ## Per-document intelligence
 
 ### HD01CU24
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: CU | **dok_id**: HD01CU24 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Reformpaket för förenklad byggprocess och kortare kommunala handläggningstider; instämmer i regeringens förslag med vissa följdmotioner.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - M (regeringsförslag)
 - KD/L medverkar
 - S följdmotion finansiering
 - C tekniska reservationer
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 Tidö-leverans i bostadsfrågan; mätbar effekt via SCB BO0101 från Q3 2026; relevant för storstad-pendlare-segmentet.
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Implementeringsrisken ligger på kommunal handläggar­kapacitet, inte på lagtexten. Effekt på påbörjade bostäder syns tidigast 2026-Q3.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD01CU24](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01cu24.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd01cu24.json`
 
 ### HD01JuU10
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: JuU | **dok_id**: HD01JuU10 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Ny vapenlag med skärpta tillstånds- och vapenregister­krav; IT-modernisering av vapenregistret krävs; ikraftträdande planerat Q3 2026.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - M+SD primära avsändare
 - KD/L stöder
 - V/MP partiella reservationer
 - Polismyndigheten implementeringsbärare
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 Centralt narrativ för 'trygghet'-frame; Tidöns största kriminalpolitiska leverans i 2025/26-mötet; konsoliderar SD-väljare.
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Implementeringen är beroende av att RiR-rekommendationerna i HD01JuU31 stängs; risk för operativ flaskhals hos Polismyndigheten.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01juu10.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd01juu10.json`
 
 ### HD01JuU31
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: JuU | **dok_id**: HD01JuU31 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Riksrevisionens andra uppföljning av Polisreformen 2015; 9 öppna rekommendationer; utskottet kräver statusrapport Q3 2026.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - RiR (Riksrevisionen) avsändare
 - JuU-utskott (S+M+SD+KD+L+V+MP+C konsensus)
 - Polismyndigheten implementeringsbärare
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 Avslöjar kapacitetsglappet bakom HD01JuU10; politiskt verktyg för opposition men formellt accepterat av Tidö.
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Operativ förändring osannolik före september-valet 2026; effekten är narrativ — exponerar gap mellan ambition och kapacitet.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01juu31.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd01juu31.json`
 
 ### HD01SoU25
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: SoU | **dok_id**: HD01SoU25 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Nationell anhörigstrategi och förstärkt äldreomsorg; KD primär avsändare; finansiering ej fullt täckt i HD03100 vårpropositionen.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - KD primär
 - M+L stöder
 - S följdmotion fokus på finansiering
 - V kompletterande reservation
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 Direkt-leverans till pensionärs- och kvinnor-50+-segmenten; bär KD:s identitetspolitik; finansieringsbristen är fragility (R-1).
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Implementeringen kräver nationell direktör (utses 2026-06-30) och kommunal kapacitet; effekt synlig först 2026 H2.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01sou25.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd01sou25.json`
 
 ### HD10448
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD10448-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD10448-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: Ip | **dok_id**: HD10448 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Interpellation från MP/S till energiminister om systematisk desinformation om vindkraft i kommunala beslutsprocesser; svar 2026-05-06.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - MP+S avsändare
 - Energiminister svarsbärare
 - kommuner Norrbotten/Västerbotten primär kontext
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 Första parlamentariska eko av 2023 års vindkraftsmotståndsvåg; testar regeringens förmåga att hantera disinformation utan att alienera SD-bas.
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Frame är dubbelbottnad — gynnar opposition på storstad/yngre men kan förlora för MP+S i glesbygd; H3 i devils-advocate.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD10448](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd10448.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd10448.json`
 
 ### HD11747
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD11747-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD11747-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: Fr | **dok_id**: HD11747 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Skriftlig fråga från S-ledamot om bristande arbetsmiljöuppföljning vid lönestödsanställningar; svar inom 4 dagar.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - S-ledamot avsändare
 - Arbetsmarknadsminister svarsbärare
 - Arbetsförmiljöverket
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 S:s primära attackkanal mot Tidö i förvärvsarbetande LO/TCO-segmentet; etablerar 'arbetsmiljö och stöd'-frame inför kampanj.
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Liten omedelbar effekt men bygger berättelse-arsenal till manifest-fasen 2026-08.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD11747](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11747.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd11747.json`
 
 ### HD11748
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD11748-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD11748-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: Fr | **dok_id**: HD11748 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Skriftlig fråga från V-ledamot om svensk hantering av Burundi-tolken Sahabo; mänskliga rättigheter och utlämning.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - V-ledamot avsändare
 - Migrationsminister + UD svarsbärare
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 Mindre väljarbas-relevans men hög aktivist-betydelse; bygger V:s mänskliga-rättigheter-profil i yngre/akademiker-segment.
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Ingen omedelbar policy-effekt; ingår i V:s pre-kampanjnarrativ.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD11748](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11748.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd11748.json`
 
 ### HD11749
-
-_Source: [`documents/HD11749-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: documents/HD11749-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md -->
 
 **Organ**: Fr | **dok_id**: HD11749 | **Window**: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)
 
-## Summary
+### Summary
 
 Skriftlig fråga från V-ledamot om brister i undervisning för barn placerade i förvar; barnkonventionsöverväganden.
 
-## Key actors
+### Key actors
 
 - V-ledamot avsändare
 - Migrationsminister + utbildningsminister svarsbärare
 
-## Significance
+### Significance
 
 V:s starkaste yngre-väljare-signal i window; rättigheter-frame; potentiell följdmotion i SoU eller UbU.
 
-## Evidence and reading
+### Evidence and reading
 
 Liten omedelbar effekt men hög sammanlänkning med Yngre 18-29-segmentet.
 
-## Source
+### Source
 
 - Primary: [riksdagen.se HD11749](https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11749.json)
 - Companion JSON: `documents/hd11749.json`
 
 ## Election 2026 Analysis
-
-_Source: [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md)_
+<!-- source: election-2026-analysis.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM (B2)
 **Election date**: 2026-09-13 | **Days remaining**: 141
 
-## Pre-campaign architecture
+### Pre-campaign architecture
 
 - **Government bloc**: M, KD, L, SD-confidence — entered window with 173/349-seat working majority
 - **Opposition**: S 107 / V 24 / MP 18 / C 24 — 173 (mirror)
 - **Tied chamber arithmetic** is the structural feature; wedge politics dominates
 
-## Window-end snapshot
+### Window-end snapshot
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TB
@@ -1069,7 +1049,7 @@ flowchart TB
   style O stroke-width:2px
 ```
 
-## Window dynamics summary
+### Window dynamics summary
 
 | Driver | Effect on M+KD+L | Effect on S | Effect on SD |
 |--------|-------------------|-------------|--------------|
@@ -1081,7 +1061,7 @@ flowchart TB
 
 **Net window effect**: M+KD+L bloc +2.0 ppt, S +0.6 ppt, SD +0.4 ppt — **inside polling noise**, not yet structural shift.
 
-## Key forward dates
+### Key forward dates
 
 | Date | Event | Decision relevance |
 |------|-------|--------------------|
@@ -1091,15 +1071,14 @@ flowchart TB
 | 2026-08-15 | Manifesto launches expected | KJ-3 |
 | 2026-09-13 | Election | terminal |
 
-## Sources
+### Sources
 
 HD01FiU48 sibling, HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD10448 [riksdagen.se]
 
 ## Coalition Mathematics
+<!-- source: coalition-mathematics.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md -->
 
-_Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md)_
-
-## Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)
+### Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)
 
 | Party | Seats | Bloc |
 |-------|-------|------|
@@ -1115,7 +1094,7 @@ _Source: [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/
 
 Government bloc (M+KD+L): 103. With SD confidence: 176. **Working majority: 3 seats above 175 threshold** (4 with SD discipline).
 
-## Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (carried)
+### Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (carried)
 
 | Party | Ja | Nej | Avstår | Frånvarande |
 |-------|----|----|--------|-------------|
@@ -1133,7 +1112,7 @@ Government bloc (M+KD+L): 103. With SD confidence: 176. **Working majority: 3 se
 
 **Reading**: M+SD+S+KD = 263 Ja → unprecedented multi-bloc supermajority on fuel-tax relief.
 
-## Forward votes (pending May 2026)
+### Forward votes (pending May 2026)
 
 | dok_id | Issue | Ja-projection | Nej-projection |
 |--------|-------|----------------|-----------------|
@@ -1142,7 +1121,7 @@ Government bloc (M+KD+L): 103. With SD confidence: 176. **Working majority: 3 se
 | HD01SoU25 | Äldreomsorg | M+SD+KD+L+ partial S | partial V |
 | HD01CU24 | Byggprocess | M+SD+KD+L+C | partial V/MP |
 
-## Coalition arithmetic — September 2026 election
+### Coalition arithmetic — September 2026 election
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1167,10 +1146,9 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Voter Segmentation
+<!-- source: voter-segmentation.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md -->
 
-_Source: [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md)_
-
-## Segments tracked (this window)
+### Segments tracked (this window)
 
 | Segment | Size (est) | Cycle dynamics |
 |---------|------------|----------------|
@@ -1193,14 +1171,14 @@ pie showData
   "Övriga" : 5
 ```
 
-## Window movement (qualitative)
+### Window movement (qualitative)
 
 - **Pensionärer**: HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi is *direct delivery*; finansieringsbrist (R-1) is the only fragility.
 - **Glesbygd**: HD01FiU48 fuel-tax is consolidating; HD10448 wind-disinfo frame is divisive within segment.
 - **Förvärvsarbetande LO/TCO**: HD11747 lönestöd-arbetsmiljö story is S's primary attack channel; HD01JuU10 firearms law popular.
 - **Yngre**: HD11749 rights-of-detained children scheme is V's strongest young-voter signal.
 
-## Cross-segment messaging map
+### Cross-segment messaging map
 
 | Coalition | Primary segments | Key window evidence |
 |-----------|------------------|---------------------|
@@ -1211,7 +1189,7 @@ pie showData
 | MP | Yngre + Storstad-pendlare | HD10448 |
 | C | Företagare + Glesbygd | (procedural this window) |
 
-## Cross-segment flow
+### Cross-segment flow
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1230,15 +1208,14 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Comparative International
-
-_Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md)_
+<!-- source: comparative-international.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Method**: Cross-Nordic + EU peer comparison on the four delivered portfolios
 
 **Comparator set**: Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, Netherlands
 
-## Comparator table — fiscal pivot to election
+### Comparator table — fiscal pivot to election
 
 | Jurisdiction | Election | Pre-election fiscal action | Coalition pattern | Outcome lesson |
 |--------------|----------|----------------------------|---------------------|----------------|
@@ -1251,7 +1228,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Pattern**: Across 5 Nordic + EU peers, fiscal pre-election household relief delivered 4–6 months before vote correlates with polling stability (median +1.8 ppt for incumbent block) but rarely delivers >3 ppt lift. Sweden's HD01FiU48 sits within this band — supports Scenario B (Wedge Stalemate).
 
-## Comparator table — police-reform follow-up
+### Comparator table — police-reform follow-up
 
 | Jurisdiction | Reform | Audit follow-up | Outcome | Sweden parallel |
 |--------------|--------|------------------|---------|-----------------|
@@ -1262,7 +1239,7 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 
 **Pattern**: Police reorganisation audits in the Nordic region typically cycle through two follow-up rounds before recommendations close. RiR 2026:6 + HD01JuU31 represent the *first* follow-up; expect a second around 2029.
 
-## Cross-Nordic coalition-discipline benchmark
+### Cross-Nordic coalition-discipline benchmark
 
 | Country | Coalition type | Pre-election counter-motion rate | Sweden 2026 |
 |---------|----------------|----------------------------------|-------------|
@@ -1274,12 +1251,11 @@ _Source: [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmoni
 **Implication**: SD's 18-day zero-counter-motion streak is **outside the Nordic norm** and reads as a deliberate pre-election signal of confidence-relationship durability.
 
 ## Historical Parallels
+<!-- source: historical-parallels.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md -->
 
-_Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md)_
-
-## Selected parallels
+### Selected parallels
 
-### Pre-election fiscal pivot
+#### Pre-election fiscal pivot
 
 - **2014 Reinfeldt → Löfven**: Spring 2014 alliance-bloc tax restraint pre-election; opposition won despite delivery.
 - **2018 Löfven I-II transition**: Fiscal package autumn 2017; supermajority not achieved; tied election result.
@@ -1287,14 +1263,14 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Lesson**: Fiscal pre-election delivery is necessary but rarely sufficient (mean polling lift 4-6 weeks post-vote: +1.8 ppt for incumbent bloc, n=4 cycles).
 
-### Police-reform follow-up
+#### Police-reform follow-up
 
 - **2010 Politireformen DK**: Two follow-up audits; 7-yr stabilisation cycle; HD01JuU31 ≈ first follow-up. [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]
 - **Polisreformen 2015 (Sweden)**: Riksrevisionen 2018, 2021, now 2026:6. Recommendations close at ~30%/audit cycle.
 
 **Lesson**: HD01JuU31 will not produce visible operational change before September election; political effect is *narrative*.
 
-### Confidence-coalition discipline
+#### Confidence-coalition discipline
 
 - **2014–2018 alliance under Löfven**: counter-motion rate ≈ 8%; modest discipline.
 - **2018–2022 januariavtal**: ~5%; high discipline because formal contract.
@@ -1302,7 +1278,7 @@ _Source: [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/b
 
 **Lesson**: Tidöavtalet's discipline is *outside* historical norms; explanations either institutional (formal contract effect) or strategic (single-cycle pre-election) — H2 in devils-advocate stresses the latter.
 
-### Wind-power disinformation cycle
+#### Wind-power disinformation cycle
 
 - **2023 vindkraftsmotstånd Q3**: Norrbotten/Västerbotten kommunala vetoexplosion. HD10448 is the first parliamentary echo of that cycle. [riksdagen.se HD10448]
 
@@ -1315,7 +1291,7 @@ timeline
   2026 : Tidö portfolio + supermajoritet : pending September
 ```
 
-## Cycle parallels diagram
+### Cycle parallels diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart LR
@@ -1330,10 +1306,9 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Implementation Feasibility
+<!-- source: implementation-feasibility.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md -->
 
-_Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md)_
-
-## Implementation matrix
+### Implementation matrix
 
 | dok_id | Owner | Critical-path constraint | Window to visible effect | Feasibility |
 |--------|-------|---------------------------|---------------------------|-------------|
@@ -1346,7 +1321,7 @@ _Source: [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmon
 | UFöU3 NATO eFP | FM | Förbandsutbyggnad 1200 trupp | 6–9 months | HIGH (sibling) |
 | HD01FiU48 fuel | Treasury (live) | Implementerat 2026-05-01 | live | HIGH |
 
-## Capacity-bottleneck panorama
+### Capacity-bottleneck panorama
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
@@ -1366,7 +1341,7 @@ flowchart TD
   style F1 stroke-width:2px
 ```
 
-## Forward implementation triggers
+### Forward implementation triggers
 
 - HD01JuU10 vapenregister IT-modernisering: status report expected Q3 2026 from Polismyndigheten.
 - HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi national director: appointment expected 2026-06-30.
@@ -1376,19 +1351,18 @@ flowchart TD
 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31] [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10] [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25] [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]
 
 ## Devil's Advocate
-
-_Source: [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md)_
+<!-- source: devils-advocate.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: MEDIUM (B2)
 **Method**: ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) + structured red-team
 
-## Mainline finding under stress
+### Mainline finding under stress
 
 > *Tidö coalition has completed its 2025/26 portfolio; implementation is the binding risk; opposition has tactical capture without legislative reversals.*
 
 The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is **wrong** and tests three competing hypotheses.
 
-### Hypothesis H1: The April-24 batch is *electoral theatre*, not delivery
+#### Hypothesis H1: The April-24 batch is *electoral theatre*, not delivery
 
 **Claim**: HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24 are scheduled for committee but not finalised in chamber. The "delivered portfolio" thesis is therefore premature; April-24 is closer to *commitments* than *outcomes*.
 
@@ -1398,7 +1372,7 @@ The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is **wrong** and tests three co
 
 **Verdict**: Mainline is **structurally correct, terminologically loose**. Replace "delivered" with "committed and structurally locked-in" in formal claims.
 
-### Hypothesis H2: SD discipline is *strategic patience*, not durable
+#### Hypothesis H2: SD discipline is *strategic patience*, not durable
 
 **Claim**: SD's zero-counter-motion streak is calculated short-term restraint. Once campaigning begins (≈2026-06-15), SD will publicly differentiate from M on migration/healthcare to mobilise its base, ending the discipline streak.
 
@@ -1408,7 +1382,7 @@ The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is **wrong** and tests three co
 
 **Verdict**: Mainline confidence on SD discipline should drop from VERY HIGH to **HIGH** for the 2026-06-15 → 2026-09-13 window. Add explicit indicator (T-1).
 
-### Hypothesis H3: HD10448 disinformation frame is a Trojan attack on SD
+#### Hypothesis H3: HD10448 disinformation frame is a Trojan attack on SD
 
 **Claim**: MP/V's HD10448 wind-power-disinformation interpellation is not a sincere policy concern but a frame designed to force SD into either *defending* anti-renewable rhetoric (alienating moderate voters) or *renouncing* it (alienating its base).
 
@@ -1418,7 +1392,7 @@ The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is **wrong** and tests three co
 
 **Verdict**: Plausible but not actionable. Track post-reply media uptake for confirmation.
 
-### Hypothesis H4: Implementation pivot is the *opposition's* opportunity, not a coalition risk
+#### Hypothesis H4: Implementation pivot is the *opposition's* opportunity, not a coalition risk
 
 **Claim**: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 hands the opposition a Polismyndigheten capacity stick that they can use through the entire campaign without ever proposing legislation. Tidö's "delivery" claim becomes a liability if implementation falters.
 
@@ -1428,7 +1402,7 @@ The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is **wrong** and tests three co
 
 **Verdict**: Real risk. Strengthens R-2 in risk register; ought to be cross-referenced.
 
-## Structured red-team summary
+### Structured red-team summary
 
 | Hypothesis | Plausibility | Mainline correction needed? |
 |-----------|--------------|------------------------------|
@@ -1437,16 +1411,15 @@ The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is **wrong** and tests three co
 | H3 — Trojan disinfo frame | LOW-MEDIUM | No |
 | H4 — opposition opportunity | MEDIUM-HIGH | Yes — risk emphasis |
 
-## Mainline carries forward, with two corrections
+### Mainline carries forward, with two corrections
 
 1. Reword "delivered" → "committed and structurally locked-in" (H1).
 2. Drop SD-discipline confidence VERY HIGH → HIGH for June–September (H2).
 
 ## Classification Results
+<!-- source: classification-results.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md -->
 
-_Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md)_
-
-## 7-dimension classification
+### 7-dimension classification
 
 | Dimension | Value | Source |
 |-----------|-------|--------|
@@ -1458,7 +1431,7 @@ _Source: [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | Sensitivity | PUBLIC | open-source riksdagen.se data only |
 | Confidence ceiling | A1 (structural) / B2 (forward) | per Admiralty |
 
-## Document-level classification
+### Document-level classification
 
 | dok_id | Type | Organ | Stage | Forward leverage |
 |--------|------|-------|-------|------------------|
@@ -1494,13 +1467,12 @@ flowchart LR
 ```
 
 ## Cross-Reference Map
-
-_Source: [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md)_
+<!-- source: cross-reference-map.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Mode**: Tier-C aggregation — siblings ingested per `ext/tier-c-aggregation.md`
 
-## Sibling synthesis files ingested
+### Sibling synthesis files ingested
 
 The following sibling folders matching `analysis/daily/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<type>` were read into Pass 1 to establish the 30-day longitudinal picture and carry forward open PIRs:
 
@@ -1519,7 +1491,7 @@ The following sibling folders matching `analysis/daily/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<type>` were
 | `analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md` | HD024082, HD024096 | Counter-motion choreography |
 | `analysis/daily/2026-04-13/propositions/synthesis-summary.md` | HD03100, HD0399, HD03240 | Spring fiscal/energy origin |
 
-## Cross-reference matrix (this window vs siblings)
+### Cross-reference matrix (this window vs siblings)
 
 | Theme | This window (primary) | Sibling reinforcement | Forward leverage |
 |-------|----------------------|------------------------|------------------|
@@ -1545,46 +1517,45 @@ flowchart LR
   style M25 stroke-width:3px
 ```
 
-## Continuity of analytic line
+### Continuity of analytic line
 
 This monthly review extends `analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/` by 2 calendar days and integrates the 2026-04-24 closure batch. The dominant analytic claim — *the Tidö coalition has completed its declared 2025/26 portfolio with implementation now the binding risk* — is **strengthened** by HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24 evidence and **unaltered** in direction.
 
 ## Methodology Reflection & Limitations
-
-_Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md)_
+<!-- source: methodology-reflection.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md -->
 
 **Author**: James Pether Sörling | **Confidence**: HIGH (A1)
 **Standards reference**: ICD 203 (Analytic Standards), Heuer & Pherson Structured Analytic Techniques
 
-## ICD 203 audit
+### ICD 203 audit
 
-### (a) Objectivity / independence of political consideration
+#### (a) Objectivity / independence of political consideration
 
 ✅ Analyst attestation: no advisory, employment, or financial relationship with any Riksdag party, ministry, or affiliated body in the past 24 months. Source diet (riksdagen.se primary documents + sibling self-references) eliminates source-side political bias.
 
 ⚠️ Residual concern: confirmation bias toward Tidö-delivery thesis given prior monthly review's same conclusion. Mitigation: explicit devils-advocate.md with four competing hypotheses; H1/H2 corrections accepted into mainline.
 
-### (b) Clear distinction between facts, assumptions, and judgments
+#### (b) Clear distinction between facts, assumptions, and judgments
 
 ✅ Each KJ explicitly labelled with confidence band; PIRs separated from KJs; carried-forward PIRs are explicitly tagged as such.
 
 ⚠️ Forward-poll claims (PIR-A) rely on single-source Demoskop projection — flagged as MEDIUM confidence rather than HIGH; assumption of 4–6 week SOM-lag is methodological assumption, not fact.
 
-### (c) WEP language
+#### (c) WEP language
 
 ✅ Used "highly likely / likely / possible / unlikely" mapped to numeric probability ranges per Kent Scale; confidence labels (VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / VERY LOW) used consistently.
 
-### (d) Stress-testing via competing hypotheses
+#### (d) Stress-testing via competing hypotheses
 
 ✅ Devils-advocate.md applies ACH against 4 hypotheses; H1 (theatre vs delivery) and H2 (SD discipline duration) accepted as mainline corrections.
 
-### (e) Source citation
+#### (e) Source citation
 
 ✅ All claims trace to either (i) primary `dok_id` (HD01CU24, HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD10448, HD11747, HD11748, HD11749), (ii) sibling synthesis files, or (iii) named institutional sources (RiR 2026:6, riksdagen.se).
 
 ⚠️ One claim ("Demoskop 4–6 week SOM-lag") cites general methodology rather than specific report; weakest link in source chain.
 
-## ACH worksheet status
+### ACH worksheet status
 
 | Hypothesis | Status | Action |
 |------------|--------|--------|
@@ -1594,41 +1565,40 @@ _Source: [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor
 | H3 — Trojan disinfo frame | rejected (insufficient evidence) | track post-reply media |
 | H4 — opposition opportunity | accepted | strengthens R-2 |
 
-## Methodology Improvements
+### Methodology Improvements
 
-### Improvement 1: Quantify SOM-lag explicitly
+#### Improvement 1: Quantify SOM-lag explicitly
 
 **Issue**: Vague "4–6 week SOM-lag" reference. **Action**: Codify in `analysis/methodologies/` a calibrated SOM-Demoskop transmission table with citations. **Owner**: data-pipeline-specialist. **Target**: 2026-05-15.
 
-### Improvement 2: Add Polismyndigheten capacity dashboard
+#### Improvement 2: Add Polismyndigheten capacity dashboard
 
 **Issue**: HD01JuU31 implementation tracking is currently narrative-only. **Action**: Build a recurring dashboard on (a) RiR 2026:6 recommendation closure rate, (b) Polismyndigheten Q-on-Q personnel changes, (c) Brå crime statistics. **Owner**: intelligence-operative + data-visualization-specialist. **Target**: 2026-06-01.
 
-### Improvement 3: Counter-motion-rate baseline benchmark
+#### Improvement 3: Counter-motion-rate baseline benchmark
 
 **Issue**: SD's zero-counter-motion claim relies on sibling synthesis files; lacks Nordic-wide benchmark. **Action**: Build comparator dataset for Denmark/Norway/Finland confidence-coalition counter-motion rates 2018–2025. **Owner**: comparative-international skills set. **Target**: 2026-06-30.
 
-### Improvement 4: Earlier wedge-architecture detection
+#### Improvement 4: Earlier wedge-architecture detection
 
 **Issue**: HD11747/11748/11749 wedge taxonomy was identified *after* documents appeared rather than predicted. **Action**: Forward-indicators.md template should pre-register wedge categories so detection is faster. **Owner**: news-journalist + analyst-of-record. **Target**: 2026-05-08.
 
-## What worked well this cycle
+### What worked well this cycle
 
 - ✅ Tier-C sibling-folder ingestion gave robust 30-day picture from only 8 fresh primaries.
 - ✅ DIW ranking remained stable across sensitivity perturbation (top-3 unchanged).
 - ✅ Carried-forward PIR ledger from 2026-04-23 closed cleanly with vote evidence.
 
-## What didn't
+### What didn't
 
 - ⚠️ HD03100 fiscal text not directly read this cycle (sibling-only); should refresh quarterly.
 - ⚠️ Lookback fallback (1-day) means "monthly" is arithmetic only on siblings; document this explicitly in manifest.
 - ⚠️ One MCP enrichment retry needed.
 
 ## Data Download Manifest
+<!-- source: data-download-manifest.md :: https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md -->
 
-_Source: [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md)_
-
-## Documents in this aggregation
+### Documents in this aggregation
 
 This monthly review aggregates 8 primary documents from the 2026-04-24 chamber day, supplemented by sibling-day analyses (2026-04-23 monthly-review and the drivmedelsskattepaketet carry-narrative covered in cross-reference-map.md).
 
@@ -1645,12 +1615,47 @@ This monthly review aggregates 8 primary documents from the 2026-04-24 chamber d
 
 Source JSON copies stored in `documents/`. Per-document analyses in `documents/<DOK_ID>-analysis.md`.
 
-## Sibling-month context (cross-reference only — not aggregated)
+### Sibling-month context (cross-reference only — not aggregated)
 
 The `cross-reference-map.md` cites prior siblings: 2026-04-23 monthly-review, 2026-04-22 propositions (vårpropositionen), and 2026-04-21 committee-reports (drivmedelsskattepaketet). These are referenced for narrative continuity, not re-aggregated here. Refer to those sibling folders for primary dok_id analyses.
 
-## Provenance
+### Provenance
 
 - API: `https://data.riksdagen.se` open data
 - Fetched: 2026-04-25 by `scripts/download-parliamentary-data.ts` with date=2026-04-24 lookback fallback
 - Manifest at `manifest.json`
+
+## Article Sources
+
+Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:
+
+- [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md)
+- [`synthesis-summary.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md)
+- [`intelligence-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md)
+- [`significance-scoring.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md)
+- [`media-framing-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md)
+- [`stakeholder-perspectives.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md)
+- [`forward-indicators.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md)
+- [`scenario-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md)
+- [`risk-assessment.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md)
+- [`swot-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md)
+- [`threat-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD10448-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD11747-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD11748-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md)
+- [`documents/HD11749-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md)
+- [`election-2026-analysis.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md)
+- [`coalition-mathematics.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md)
+- [`voter-segmentation.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md)
+- [`comparative-international.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md)
+- [`historical-parallels.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md)
+- [`implementation-feasibility.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md)
+- [`devils-advocate.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md)
+- [`classification-results.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md)
+- [`cross-reference-map.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md)
+- [`methodology-reflection.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md)
+- [`data-download-manifest.md`](https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md)
diff --git a/analysis/templates/README.md b/analysis/templates/README.md
index 07f8fafe6d..c1ce710ece 100644
--- a/analysis/templates/README.md
+++ b/analysis/templates/README.md
@@ -170,6 +170,37 @@ Key findings in `intelligence-assessment.md`, `executive-brief.md`, and `synthes
 
 Every `methodology-reflection.md` includes an ICD 203 compliance checklist verifying all 9 analytic tradecraft standards are met.
 
+### 📰 Reader-Facing Output Contract (script-enforced)
+
+Tradecraft alone does not produce **publication-quality** articles — strong intelligence content can still render as a flat artifact concatenation if the reader-facing scaffolding is weak. Every aggregated `analysis/daily/$DATE/$SUBFOLDER/article.md` is therefore validated by [`scripts/validate-article.ts`](../../scripts/validate-article.ts) (run via `npm run validate-article` and as part of `npm run validate-all`). The validator fails CI on any of these violations:
+
+| Rule code | What it blocks |
+|---|---|
+| `unresolved-placeholder` | `[REQUIRED:…]`, `AI_MUST_REPLACE`, `<insert …>`, `TBD:`, `FILL IN` strings surviving Pass-2. **Templates carry these markers on disk; if any reach the article, the AI agent skipped a substitution.** |
+| `missing-reader-guide` / `missing-executive-brief` / `missing-bluf` / `missing-sources-appendix` | Required article landmarks. |
+| `bluf-too-short` (< 80 chars) / `bluf-too-long` (> 1200 chars) | Stub or runaway BLUFs. A publishable BLUF needs actor + active verb + object + when + so-what. |
+| `empty-heading-slug` | Any heading whose permissive slug is empty (e.g. emoji-only). Empty `#anchor` would break the Reader Intelligence Guide and SERP deep-links. |
+| `per-doc-missing-dok_id` | Any `### HD…`/`### FiU…` per-document subsection lacking at least one dok_id-style code in its body. Every per-document subsection must trace to a primary-source identifier. |
+
+Authoring guidance:
+
+1. **Never ship a placeholder.** Pass-2 must replace every `[REQUIRED: …]`, `AI_MUST_REPLACE`, `<insert …>`, `TBD:` and `FILL IN` marker with concrete prose. The validator scans the **aggregated** article — there is nowhere to hide.
+2. **BLUF prose, not bullet stub.** The first prose paragraph after `## 🎯 BLUF` is what the aggregator extracts as the article `<meta description>` and as the SERP snippet. Write 1–4 evidence-bearing sentences, ≥ 80 chars, ≤ 1200 chars.
+3. **Heading hierarchy is auto-corrected.** The aggregator demotes every internal `##` to `###`, `###` to `####`, etc. so your template's `## 🎯 BLUF` becomes a properly-nested H3 under the wrapper `## Executive Brief`. **Do not pre-flatten** your template's headings to compensate — author them at the natural depth (BLUF, 60-second read, top forward trigger as `##`; their sub-bullets as `###`/`####`).
+4. **Avoid `_Source: file.md_` italics at the top of the body.** Source attribution is now generated centrally in the Reader Intelligence Guide and the `## Article Sources` appendix. Inline prose mentions like *"primary source: data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD12345"* are preserved (they're real journalism).
+5. **Avoid emoji-only headings.** A heading like `## 🎯` slugs to an empty string and the validator blocks it. Always pair the emoji with at least one word: `## 🎯 BLUF`, `## 🔮 Top Forward Trigger`.
+6. **Cite dok_id in every per-document analysis.** The aggregator emits one `### HD12345` (or `### FiU17`) per file under `documents/`; the body must mention that identifier (or another riksdagen identifier) at least once for primary-source traceability.
+
+Run the contract locally before commit:
+
+```bash
+# Re-aggregate, then validate every article in the repo:
+npx tsx scripts/aggregate-analysis.ts --all
+npm run validate-article
+```
+
+The aggregator's structural projections (heading demotion, source-preamble stripping, slug normalisation) are unit-tested in [`tests/render-lib.test.ts`](../../tests/render-lib.test.ts); the validator guards the AI-authored contribution that the aggregator concatenates. See [`Article-Generation.md`](../../Article-Generation.md) §"Article minimum-content validator" for the full contract reference.
+
 ---
 
 ## 🤖 Artifact → workflow → gate check mapping
diff --git a/js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs b/js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs
index 88d9a15db0..a2d6e6e396 100644
--- a/js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs
+++ b/js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs
@@ -1,17 +1,23 @@
 /**
- * Lightweight Mermaid loader — static-site safe.
+ * Lightweight Mermaid loader — static-site safe, served from our own origin.
  *
- * Pulls the ESM build from the pinned jsDelivr path and renders every
- * `<pre class="mermaid">` block on the page. Kept out of the critical
- * rendering path (module-deferred + idle-callback) so articles remain
- * fast to first paint.
+ * Imports the ESM build from `js/lib/mermaid/` (vendored from the pinned
+ * `mermaid` devDependency by `scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts` during
+ * `prebuild`) and renders every `<pre class="mermaid">` block on the page.
+ * Kept out of the critical rendering path (module-deferred + idle-callback)
+ * so articles remain fast to first paint.
  *
- * CSP note: `riksdagsmonitor.com`'s CSP allows `script-src` from
- * `cdn.jsdelivr.net` and `https:` for mermaid's font loads. If that
- * ever changes, pin a local copy under `js/lib/mermaid/`.
+ * CSP note: by serving Mermaid from the same S3/CloudFront origin as the
+ * articles, `riksdagsmonitor.com`'s CSP can use `script-src 'self'` for
+ * scripts and no third-party CDN allowlist entry is required. The local
+ * copy is also covered by `vite-plugin-sri-gen` for Subresource Integrity.
+ *
+ * The relative URL resolves against this loader's own URL — when the page
+ * imports `/js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs`, this becomes
+ * `/js/lib/mermaid/mermaid.esm.min.mjs`.
  */
 
-const MERMAID_ESM = 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mermaid@11.4.1/dist/mermaid.esm.min.mjs';
+const MERMAID_ESM = new URL('./mermaid/mermaid.esm.min.mjs', import.meta.url).href;
 
 async function boot() {
   const blocks = document.querySelectorAll('pre.mermaid');
diff --git a/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html b/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html
index 4c599cf42f..b08bcd6da7 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Realtime Monitor 1434">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:00.821Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:22.469Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:00.821Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:22.469Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-17T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1434","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet advanced two grundlag amendments (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) on 2026-04-17 — the first substantive narrowing of Tryckfrihetsförordningen (1766) in the digital-evidence…","datePublished":"2026-04-17T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:00.821Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1434","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet advanced two grundlag amendments (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) on 2026-04-17 — the first substantive narrowing of Tryckfrihetsförordningen (1766) in the digital-evidence…","datePublished":"2026-04-17T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:22.469Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -232,10 +232,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs / 2 weeks / post-election 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet advanced two grundlag amendments (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) on 2026-04-17 — the first substantive narrowing of <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) in the digital-evidence domain in years. Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency.</strong> On the same 24-hour window, FM Maria Malmer Stenergard and PM Ulf Kristersson tabled Sweden's accession to the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine (HD03231) and the International Compensation Commission (HD03232) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg. The cluster reveals a coordinated pre-election legislative sprint across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, housing-market integrity, and quality-of-life deregulation. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Publication Decision</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> S4 × T1</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-posture threat monitoring</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T6 · Kill Chain §3</td><td align="right">Continuous, heightened post-vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The #1 finding is the KU33 grundlag amendment.</strong> Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong>. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine tribunal and compensation commission are co-prominent.</strong> Global news-value high; no direct Swedish fiscal burden; cross-party consensus near-universal (≈ 349 MPs). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met.</strong> All six documents with weighted significance ≥ 5 are covered in the published article. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td>Government leader, Ukraine co-signatory</td><td>Political owner of both constitutional and foreign-policy packages</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td>Tribunal architect</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; norm-entrepreneurship capital</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)</strong></td><td>KU33 investigative-integrity champion</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation in practice</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S, party leader)</strong></td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Her position on KU33 will decide second-reading coalition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td>Liberal identity</td><td>Coalition partner most press-freedom sensitive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</strong></td><td>V leader</td><td>Campaign voice against KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP, språkrör)</strong></td><td>MP leader</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional review</td><td>Pending yttrande is the single most consequential upcoming signal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong></td><td>Ukraine President</td><td>Hague Convention co-signatory Dec 2025</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/KU32</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict language ⇒ R2 ↓ 4; silent ⇒ R2 ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>May–Jun 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote (vilande beslut)</strong> on KU33/KU32</td><td>First-reading confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>Late-May / Jun 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote on HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Tribunal + reparations accession</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous</td><td><strong>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins</strong></td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO joint remissvar (SJF, TU, Utgivarna)</strong></td><td>Sets interpretive record on "formellt tillförd bevisning"</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td><strong>Swedish general election</strong></td><td>Post-election composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -421,12 +421,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>DIW v1.0 methodology applied; sensitivity analysis confirms top rank</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All 6 documents with weighted ≥ 5.0 covered</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (first reading)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Established patterns; committee record clear</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (<strong>second</strong> reading)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on 2026 election outcome — inherent uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation prediction</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Interpretively fragile; three plausible postures documented</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Historical pattern suggests rising, but exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US administration tribunal position</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; shift possible</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -478,10 +478,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SYN-ID</strong></td><td>SYN-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>realtime-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-16 14:00 UTC → 2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-realtime-monitor (Copilot Opus 4.7)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodologies Applied</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.0, political-swot-framework, political-risk-methodology, political-threat-framework, political-classification-guide</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>get_propositioner</code>, <code>get_betankanden</code>, <code>search_dokument</code>, <code>search_regering</code>, <code>get_dokument</code>, <code>get_g0v_document_content</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Freshness</strong></td><td>&#x3C; 1 minute at query time — FRESH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The 24 hours between 2026-04-16 14:00 UTC and 2026-04-17 14:34 UTC produced the <strong>single most consequential democratic-infrastructure development</strong> of the 2025/26 Riksmöte: the <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</strong> approved first readings of two <strong>grundlag amendments</strong> — <code>HD01KU32</code> (media accessibility under the <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> and <em>Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen</em>) and <code>HD01KU33</code> (removing "allmän handling" status from digital material seized in husrannsakan). Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes straddling a general election, the 2026 campaign will be shaped by — and will shape — the second reading. KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF transparency in years</strong>, touching a 1766 constitutional text that is older than the United States. Separately, FM <strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> tabled historic Ukraine-accountability propositions <code>HD03231</code> (Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression — first since Nuremberg) and <code>HD03232</code> (International Compensation Commission), while <strong>Civilutskottet (CU)</strong> advanced the national condominium register (<code>HD01CU28</code>) and property-transfer AML rules (<code>HD01CU27</code>). The cluster reveals a government executing a coordinated pre-election legislative sprint across four vectors: democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, housing-market integrity, and quality-of-life deregulation. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Decision</strong>: Lead article with <strong>Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms</strong> (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33). <strong>Re-weighting rationale</strong>: Raw significance score favours HD03231 (news-value), but <strong>democratic-impact weighting</strong> prioritises grundlag-level changes that are systemic, long-tail, and directly reshape citizens' access rights and press freedom under Sweden's 1766 TF. Ukraine accountability is tabled as <strong>co-prominent secondary coverage</strong> — historically important and globally newsworthy, but institutionally one more step in an already-established Swedish foreign-policy trajectory (Ukraine aid since 2022, NATO March 2024). The KU amendments are the <strong>novel democratic event</strong> of the day.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision
 <p><strong>Democratic-impact weighting doctrine</strong> (documented in <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> update): grundlag amendments receive +25% to +40% weight because their effects are <strong>systemic, constitutional, and durable</strong> rather than policy-cyclical. This prevents news-value bias from crowding out democratic-infrastructure stories.</p>
 <p><strong>Anti-pattern avoidance</strong>: Earlier draft of this synthesis ordered Ukraine as LEAD on raw significance; corrected after <code>[NEW REQUIREMENT]</code> signal that democratic-impact weighting must dominate when grundlag amendments are in play.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28">📚 Documents Analysed: 6 (Level-3 depth for KU33; Level-2 for KU32/HD03231/HD03232/CU27/CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28">📚 Documents Analysed: 6 (Level-3 depth for KU33; Level-2 for KU32/HD03231/HD03232/CU27/CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231h
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Date</th><th align="center">Raw / Weighted</th><th align="center">Depth Level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Search/Seizure Digital Materials (constitutional)</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">7 / <strong>9.8</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 L3 Intelligence</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Media Accessibility (constitutional)</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">6.6 / <strong>8.25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 L3 Intelligence</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine Aggression Tribunal</td><td>Prop</td><td>UU (receiving)</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td align="center">9 / 8.55</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Compensation Commission</td><td>Prop</td><td>UU (receiving)</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td align="center">8 / 7.60</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>National Condominium Register</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property Transfer Identity Requirements</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cluster-map">🗺️ Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cluster-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-map">🗺️ Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph CL1["📜 Cluster 1 — Constitutional First Reading (KU) — LEAD / Democratic Tier-1"]
         HD01KU33["HD01KU33&#x3C;br/>Search &#x26; Seizure&#x3C;br/>Bet 2025/26:KU33&#x3C;br/>🏛️ LEAD"]
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-cluster-map">🗺️ Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style CONTEXT_ZEL fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF
     style CONTEXT_CRIME fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Finding</th><th>Evidence (dok_id / source)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Democratic Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td>KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF's offentlighetsprincip</strong> in the digital-evidence sphere — modifies a 1766 text that predates the U.S. Constitution</td><td>HD01KU33 betänkande; TF 1766 original text; KU committee record</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>Two-reading requirement (8 kap. RF) means KU32/KU33 become <strong>election-campaign material</strong> — the 2026 valrörelse will shape the second reading in the new Riksdag</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33 summaries; 8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>KU33's exception — "allmän handling" status preserved only when material is <em>formally incorporated as evidence</em> — creates an interpretive frontier; narrow interpretation by a future government could systematically shield police operations from insyn</td><td>HD01KU33 text; Lagrådet review pending</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F4</td><td>KU32 establishes a <strong>precedent</strong> that EU obligations can expand ordinary-law intrusion into grundlag-protected sphere (e-books, e-commerce, streaming) — future Parliaments may use this template to further compress grundlag protections</td><td>HD01KU32 betänkande; EU Accessibility Act 2019/882</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) = founding-member status → Sweden's largest norm-entrepreneurship commitment since NATO accession; no direct fiscal burden (reparations funded from Russian immobilised assets EUR 260B)</td><td>HD03231 proposition; HD03232 proposition; G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM (foreign-policy)</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td>Nuremberg framing is <strong>politically deliberate</strong> — unifies cross-party support and pre-empts SD/domestic criticism</td><td>FM Stenergard verbatim statement 2026-04-16</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>CU27/CU28 extend government's organised-crime agenda into property markets (~2M bostadsrätter); CU28's Lantmäteriet register is a 2M-record IT migration by Jan 2027</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28; organised-crime policy lineage</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td><strong>Cross-cluster interference</strong>: the government's political bandwidth is split between defending KU33 (domestic press-freedom scrutiny) and championing HD03231 (international press-freedom positioning via accountability for Russian war crimes); this is a <strong>rhetorical tension</strong> opposition parties may exploit</td><td>political-swot-framework.md §"TOWS Interference"; campaign-rhetoric analysis</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from risk-assessment.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from risk-assessment.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Composite Political Risk — Apr 10-17 2026"
     x-axis ["Apr 10", "Apr 11", "Apr 12", "Apr 13", "Apr 14", "Apr 15", "Apr 16", "Apr 17"]
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Land
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1 — Russian hybrid retaliation (post-tribunal)</td><td align="center">16 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2 — KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>MITIGATE</strong> (press freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>R3 — Tribunal effectiveness without US</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE MITIGATION</td></tr><tr><td>R4 — KU32 precedent for further grundlag erosion</td><td align="center">10 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R5 — Reparations fatigue (decadal)</td><td align="center">9 / 25</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R6 — Property register implementation</td><td align="center">8 / 25</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-party-political-dynamics">🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-party-political-dynamics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-party-political-dynamics">🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-political-dynamics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-party-political-dynamics">🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics<
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">KU33 (press freedom)</th><th align="center">KU32 (accessibility)</th><th align="center">Ukraine Props</th><th align="center">Housing (CU)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>M (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For (proposing)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Support)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For (AML angle)</td><td align="center">🟡 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (Nuremberg framing aligns)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 <strong>Divided</strong> (press-freedom history)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Against</strong> likely at 2nd reading</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (accountability lens)</td><td align="center">🟡 Divided</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Against</strong> likely at 2nd reading</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Synthesis</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: KU33 passes the first reading comfortably but the <strong>second reading</strong> after Sep 2026 election is <strong>not guaranteed</strong> — V/MP will almost certainly vote against; S fractures possible. If the new Riksdag produces a left-leaning majority, KU33 could fall. Ukraine consensus ≈ 349 MPs (near-universal). KU32 cross-party. CU broad.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicator
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner / Source</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Riksdag chamber vote on HD01KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>KU referral → kammarvote (vilande beslut)</td><td>Kammaren, KU</td><td align="center"><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td>Press-freedom NGO positions (TU, Utgivarna, SJF)</td><td>Remissvar + debate submissions</td><td><code>search_anforanden</code></td><td align="center">Continuous to 2nd reading</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td>S leadership position on KU33 (hardens for/against)</td><td>Partiledarskap statements</td><td>Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td>Lagrådets yttrande on KU amendments</td><td>Published opinion</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>US administration position on tribunal</td><td>White House statement</td><td><code>search_regering</code></td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W6</td><td>Russian hybrid-warfare escalation</td><td>SÄPO annual report; Nordic events</td><td>SÄPO, MUST</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>W7</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition → KU33 2nd-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten preliminary</td><td>Valmyndigheten</td><td align="center">Oct–Nov 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W8</td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on HD03231/HD03232</td><td>UU committee → kammarvote</td><td>Kammaren, UU</td><td align="center">Late May / June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W9</td><td>Lantmäteriet register IT procurement (HD01CU28)</td><td>Anbud notice</td><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W10</td><td>First case filed at Hague tribunal</td><td>Docket opens</td><td>Council of Europe</td><td align="center">H2 2026 or later</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Sensitivity analysis in <code>significance-scoring.md</code> confirms top rank under all plausible weight swaps</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All six documents with weighted ≥ 5.0 covered</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Established patterns; committee record clear</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party <strong>second-reading</strong> vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on 2026 election outcome</td></tr><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation prediction</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Interpretively fragile; three plausible postures in <code>HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md</code> §4</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Rising baseline, exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal-cooperation trajectory</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation-commission payout speed</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>UNCC precedent is 31 years; asset-use architecture in flux</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Before accepting the base narrative, stress-test the assumptions. What if the analyst consensus is wrong?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Ad
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Challenge</th><th>Mainstream View</th><th>Devil's-Advocate View</th><th>Analytic Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>KU33 = "press-freedom regression"?</strong></td><td>Narrowing of 1766 TF is a democratic step backwards</td><td>Norway (RSF #1), Finland (#5), Denmark (#3) operate <strong>equivalent regimes</strong> and have higher press-freedom rankings than Sweden. KU33 may normalise the Nordic mainstream rather than regress from it.</td><td>Both true simultaneously: Nordic normalisation is real; interpretive-frontier risk is real. The deciding variable is whether "formellt tillförd bevisning" is statutorily anchored (Nordic-model) or administratively fluid (Swedish-specific risk).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine tribunal as "historic"?</strong></td><td>First aggression tribunal since Nuremberg</td><td>Without US + China + major Global South participation, tribunal could be <strong>symbolically historic but operationally marginal</strong> — ICC's aggression limitation applies to the same state actors</td><td>Symbolic value has independent weight (deterrence + norm-building). Operational effectiveness is a separable question. Both analyses required.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet will calibrate interpretation?</strong></td><td>Sweden's constitutional-review tradition usually produces strict scoping</td><td>Lagrådet yttranden can be silent or ambivalent on specific interpretive questions; historical examples: FRA-lagen 2008</td><td>Base rate of Lagrådet silence on specific interpretive questions ≈ 25–35%. Plan for the silent-Lagrådet scenario (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Wildcard-1).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-cluster rhetorical tension will be exploited?</strong></td><td>V/MP will lead "press freedom abroad vs home" framing</td><td>Opposition may struggle to mobilise attentive-voter base beyond 2008 FRA-lagen levels (Piratpartiet 7.13% in EP 2009); Ukraine consensus is sticky</td><td>Tension exists as <strong>latent</strong> threat vector. Activation requires specific triggering event (Wildcard-1 scenario).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD realignment risk on Ukraine?</strong></td><td>Very low (consistent 2022–26 support)</td><td>Populist-right parties across Europe have shown realignment in 2024–26; Swedish-specific resistance not permanent</td><td>Watch R10 indicator: SD national-programme language + Åkesson speeches during 2026 campaign.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Housing register as AML success?</strong></td><td>Closes laundering blind spot</td><td>Organised-crime actors adapt rapidly (crypto, offshore entities); register may only displace rather than eliminate</td><td>Displacement effect real but measurable; KPI: prosecution conviction rate in AML+property cases 2027–29.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know">❓ Key Uncertainties (What We Cannot Yet Know)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know">❓ Key Uncertainties (What We Cannot Yet Know)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know">❓ Key Uncertainties (Wh
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Uncertainty</th><th>Decision Impact</th><th align="center">Resolution Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>U1</td><td><strong>Will Lagrådet scope "formellt tillförd bevisning" strictly?</strong></td><td>Primary driver of KU33 interpretive trajectory</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U2</td><td><strong>Will S party leadership endorse or oppose KU33?</strong></td><td>Decisive for second-reading coalition</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U3</td><td><strong>Will post-Sep-2026 Riksdag composition support KU33 ratification?</strong></td><td>Go / no-go for grundlag change</td><td align="center">Sep 13 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U4</td><td><strong>Will US administration cooperate with HD03231 tribunal?</strong></td><td>Tribunal effectiveness</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U5</td><td><strong>Will G7 coalition sustain asset-immobilisation architecture?</strong></td><td>Reparations funding viability</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>U6</td><td><strong>Will Russian hybrid-warfare response escalate above threshold?</strong></td><td>Security posture + campaign dynamics</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened pre-election)</td></tr><tr><td>U7</td><td><strong>Will Lantmäteriet register IT delivery hit Jan 2027 target?</strong></td><td>HD01CU28 policy credibility</td><td align="center">Q4 2026 procurement</td></tr><tr><td>U8</td><td><strong>Will interpretive drift in förvaltningsdomstolar favour police discretion?</strong></td><td>Long-term R2 trajectory</td><td align="center">2027–2030 first rulings</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory">🔬 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — KU33 Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory">🔬 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — KU33 Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory"></a></h3>
 <p>Testing four hypotheses against the evidence base (adapted from Heuer's ACH methodology):</p>
 
 
@@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory">🔬 Analysis
 <p><strong>ACH conclusion</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: H1 (Proportionate Reform) and H2 (Narrow Interpretation — "chilling") have <strong>equal evidentiary weight</strong>. This is consistent with the <strong>interpretive-frontier finding</strong> — the reform is literally two reforms in superposition, and the collapse is triggered by Lagrådet + legislator intent + prosecutorial practice.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster S
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Combination</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine S × KU33 T</strong></td><td>Government championing Nuremberg-style accountability abroad while narrowing TF at home → rhetorical exposure</td><td>Opposition talking point: <em>"Sweden defends press freedom elsewhere while compressing it at home"</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Housing O × Constitutional W</strong></td><td>AML register (CU28) architecture synergy with KU33 investigative-integrity rhetoric → coherent "clean institutions" narrative</td><td>Government legitimising frame: <em>"modernising institutions under rule of law"</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine T × Constitutional S</strong></td><td>Russian retaliation may target both foreign-policy signal (Stockholm embassies, cable infrastructure) and campaign discourse (KU33 framing)</td><td>Threat compounding: two independent targets, one adversary</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>(Full TOWS matrix in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS.)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-artifacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-artifacts"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Reference-grade dossier files</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md">Comparative International</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></li>
@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1289,8 +1289,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SIG-ID</strong></td><td>SIG-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-16 → 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 + <strong>Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) v1.0</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scoring-method">📐 Scoring Method<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scoring-method"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each">Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 each)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-method">📐 Scoring Method<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-method"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each">Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 each)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Parliamentary Impact</strong> — committee size, coalition implications, multi-party engagement</li>
 <li><strong>Policy Impact</strong> — scope of policy change, sector reach</li>
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each">Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 ea
 <li><strong>Cross-Party Significance</strong> — coalition strain or cross-party consensus</li>
 </ol>
 <p>Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; <strong>DIW multiplier</strong> is applied last to reflect democratic-infrastructure durability.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) — v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) — v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong>: Raw significance captures news-value. But <strong>democratic-impact weighting</strong> prioritises legislation that shapes the rules under which future politics operates — constitutional amendments, electoral law, grundlag changes, and press-freedom infrastructure. These have <strong>systemic, long-tail effects</strong> that outlast policy cycles. Without DIW, news-value alone can over-weight foreign-policy moments and under-weight constitutional events whose effects compound for decades.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document Type</th><th align="center">DIW Multiplier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Grundlag amendment (TF / YGL / RF / SO) — narrowing public access / press freedom</td><td align="center"><strong>×1.40</strong></td><td>Irreversible without second constitutional amendment; compounds over decades</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag amendment — expanding rights</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td>Durable; positive asymmetry</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law — electoral / democratic-process</td><td align="center">×1.20</td><td>Rules-of-the-game change</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign-policy proposition — historic precedent</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td>High news-value; institutional continuity with prior commitments</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law — policy-cyclical</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td>Baseline</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law — market / AML</td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td>Marginal durability premium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-five-dimension-scoring">🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-five-dimension-scoring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-scoring">🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-scoring"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-five-dimension-scoring">🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Parliamentary</th><th align="center">Policy</th><th align="center">Public Interest</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Cross-Party</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th align="center">Weighted</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>7.0</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>×1.40</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.8</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center"><strong>6.6</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>×1.25</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>📜 CO-LEAD</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>9.0</strong></td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>🌍 Secondary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>8.0</strong></td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>🤝 Secondary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU28</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>5.8</strong></td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>5.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MEDIUM</td><td>🏠 Tertiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU27</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>5.4</strong></td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>5.67</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MEDIUM</td><td>🏠 Tertiary</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-decision">📊 Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision">📊 Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-decision">📊 Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Decision</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Publication threshold</strong></td><td>Weighted ≥ 7.0 → publish as featured; ≥ 5.0 → publish as secondary coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lead Story</strong></td><td><strong>HD01KU33 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Narrowing</strong> (Weighted 9.8)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Co-Lead</strong></td><td><strong>HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility Constitutional Amendment</strong> (Weighted 8.25)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Prominent Secondary</strong></td><td><strong>HD03231 + HD03232 Ukraine Accountability</strong> (Weighted 8.55 / 7.60)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tertiary</strong></td><td><strong>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 Housing/AML</strong> (Weighted 5.67 / 5.80)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td>🔴 Breaking (multi-cluster package)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Languages</strong></td><td>EN + SV (primary); 12 others via news-translate workflow</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank">🎯 Headline Direction (Enforced Against Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank">🎯 Headline Direction (Enforced Against Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary framing</strong>: <em>"Sweden's Riksdag Advances Constitutional Press Freedom Reforms"</em> — reflects the <strong>#1 weighted rank</strong> (HD01KU33).</p>
 <p><strong>Co-prominent coverage</strong>: Ukraine accountability architecture (HD03231/HD03232) — <strong>MUST be covered as a major section</strong>; omission is an editorial failure (see <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"Lead-Story Enforcement Gate").</p>
 <p><strong>Banned omissions</strong> in published article:</p>
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank">🎯 Headline Dir
 <li>❌ Leading with document whose weighted score is not the run's #1</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps">🧮 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Ranking Hold Under Weight Swaps?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps">🧮 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Ranking Hold Under Weight Swaps?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>How robust is HD01KU33's #1 ranking to plausible variations in the Democratic-Impact Weighting?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps">🧮
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">HD01KU33 Weight</th><th align="center">HD03231 Weight</th><th align="center">HD01KU32 Weight</th><th>Top 3 Result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Baseline (DIW v1.0)</strong></td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td><strong>KU33 (9.80), HD03231 (8.55), KU32 (8.25)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>News-value dominant (no DIW)</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td>HD03231 (9.00), <strong>KU33 (7.00)</strong>, HD03232 (8.00)</td></tr><tr><td>Aggressive democratic weighting</td><td align="center">×1.60</td><td align="center">×0.90</td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td><strong>KU33 (11.20)</strong>, <strong>KU32 (9.24)</strong>, HD03231 (8.10)</td></tr><tr><td>Conservative democratic weighting</td><td align="center">×1.20</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">×1.10</td><td><strong>KU33 (8.40)</strong>, HD03231 (9.00), KU32 (7.26)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign-policy bonus (rare)</td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center">×1.30</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td>HD03231 (11.70), <strong>KU33 (9.80)</strong>, HD03232 (10.40)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity finding</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: KU33 holds the <strong>#1 position under DIW v1.0 + the two "democratic weighting" variants (3 of 5 scenarios)</strong>. Raw news-value ranking flips to HD03231 (as expected). Foreign-policy bonus (rarely justified) also flips. The DIW v1.0 outcome is <strong>robust to reasonable variation</strong> in democratic-impact weights but <strong>sensitive to whether democratic-impact weighting is applied at all</strong>. This validates the methodology choice but highlights the importance of disciplined application.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view">Alternative Rankings — Committee-First View<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view">Alternative Rankings — Committee-First View<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view"></a></h4>
 <p>If one applies a <strong>committee-first</strong> ranking (heavier weight to constitutional-committee output regardless of document-type), KU33 leads by even wider margin.</p>
 
 
@@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view">Alternative Rankings —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Committee-First Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">10.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">9.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">8.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">7.20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-decision-audit">🎯 Publication-Decision Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-decision-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision-audit">🎯 Publication-Decision Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1624,14 +1624,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-decision-audit">🎯 Publication-Decision Audit<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th align="center">Locked At</th><th>By</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead = HD01KU33</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Analyst + DIW</td><td>Top weighted score (9.80); constitutional significance</td></tr><tr><td>Co-lead = HD01KU32</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Analyst + DIW</td><td>Same grundlag package; interpretive pairing</td></tr><tr><td>Co-prominent = HD03231 + HD03232</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Coverage-completeness rule</td><td>Both weighted > 7.0</td></tr><tr><td>Secondary = HD01CU28 + HD01CU27</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Broad-coverage rule</td><td>Weighted 5.80 + 5.67</td></tr><tr><td>Excluded = HD03246</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>De-duplication</td><td>Already covered realtime-0029</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--anti-pattern-log">🔍 Anti-Pattern Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--anti-pattern-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-anti-pattern-log">🔍 Anti-Pattern Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-pattern-log"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Historical failure</strong> (self-documented 2026-04-17 post-review): The original published article <strong>omitted HD03231 and HD03232 entirely</strong>, despite their weighted scores being 8.55 and 7.60. Although the lead-story selection (Constitutional Reforms) was correct under DIW, the failure to include Ukraine accountability as co-prominent coverage represents a <strong>coverage-completeness failure</strong>. The fix is the <strong>Lead-Story Enforcement Gate</strong> added to SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md, which requires articles to cover all documents with weighted score ≥ 7.0.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>STK-ID</strong></td><td>STK-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>6-lens stakeholder matrix (power × interest × position × capacity × resource × time-horizon)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Focus</strong></td><td>Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (LEAD) · Ukraine Accountability · Housing/AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-stakeholder-framework.md</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix (Quantified, 0–10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix (Quantified, 0–10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1839,13 +1839,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010">📊 Stakeholder Positio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Power</th><th align="center">Interest</th><th align="center">KU33 Position (−5 to +5)</th><th align="center">Ukraine Props Position</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government (M/KD/L)</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">+5</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>Kristersson, Stenergard co-sign; M-KD-L party statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (parliamentary support)</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">+4 (AML/gäng alignment)</td><td align="center">+3 (Nuremberg framing)</td><td>SD law-and-order + Nuremberg-compatible rhetoric</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>0 to −2</strong> (divided)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>Historical press-freedom doctrine vs law-and-order bloc internal tension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong></td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>−4</strong></td><td align="center">+3 (accountability only)</td><td>V's Riksdag press-freedom record 2018-2025</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>−4</strong></td><td align="center">+5</td><td>MP's grundlag-protection doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">+2 (cautious)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>C liberal-centrist profile</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Journalistförbundet (SJF)</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>−5</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td>Historical TF-protection stance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Utgivarna / TU</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>−4</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td>Publisher-editor professional mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Amnesty Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">−3 (privacy/access concerns)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>International accountability priority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polismyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td align="center">+2</td><td>Operational beneficiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Åklagarmyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">+5</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>Prosecution effectiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lantmäteriet</strong></td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Executes CU28 register Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Handikappförbund (DHR/FUB)</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9 (KU32)</td><td align="center"><strong>+5 (KU32)</strong></td><td align="center">+1</td><td>KU32 accessibility beneficiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">Pending</td><td align="center">Pending</td><td>Review in progress</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky gov)</strong></td><td align="center">7 (in Ukraine context)</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Co-architect of Hague Convention Dec 2025</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF gov)</strong></td><td align="center">8 (hostile)</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center"><strong>−5</strong></td><td>Designated SE "unfriendly" 2022</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU institutions</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">+2 (EAA compliance)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>EU foreign-policy alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">+1</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>Tribunal framework body</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration</strong></td><td align="center">10 (global)</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center"><strong>0 to +2</strong> (ambiguous)</td><td>Historical ICC reluctance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden public (polling)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">0 (low awareness)</td><td align="center">+4 (60-70% support since 2022)</td><td>Novus/SOM polling patterns</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-1-citizens--swedish-public">🏛️ 1. Citizens &#x26; Swedish Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-1-citizens--swedish-public"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-public">🏛️ 1. Citizens &#x26; Swedish Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--swedish-public"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position on LEAD (KU33/KU32)</strong>: Low public awareness of grundlag mechanics; amendments typically salient only to attentive publics (~15%) <code>[MEDIUM]</code>. Press-freedom framing in 2026 campaign will raise awareness asymmetrically — V/MP electorates mobilise faster than median voter.</p>
 <p><strong>Position on Ukraine Accountability</strong>: Strong support — polling consistently <strong>60-70%+ support for Ukraine aid</strong> since 2022 (SOM Institute, Novus) <code>[HIGH]</code>. Nuremberg framing resonates.</p>
 <p><strong>Position on Housing (CU27/CU28)</strong>: Direct impact on ~2M bostadsrätter households; generally positive consumer-protection reception <code>[MEDIUM]</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral implications</strong>: KU33 risks becoming a <strong>second-order campaign issue</strong> that shifts attentive-voter preferences at the margin — V/MP could gain 0.5-1.5 pp each; S faces internal tension over whether to counter-position.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Strongly supportive of all measures — proposing and defending them.</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The package demonstrates "governing competence across domains — constitutional reform, foreign-policy leadership, housing-market modernisation, everyday-life simplification."</p>
 <p><strong>Risk exposure</strong>:</p>
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition
 <li><strong>Erik Slottner (KD, Civil Affairs)</strong>: Housing/register execution</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Ukraine</strong>: Strongly supportive — S led Sweden's 2022 Ukraine response under PM Magdalena Andersson <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -1891,14 +1891,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / M
 <li><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP, språkrör)</strong>: Grundlag-protection advocate</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--4-business--industry">🏢 4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--4-business--industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">🏢 4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Real estate sector</strong> (Mäklarsamfundet, FMI): Broadly supportive of CU28 condominium register (reduces market uncertainty and mispricing risk). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Banks &#x26; mortgage lenders</strong> (SEB, Swedbank, Handelsbanken, SBAB): Supportive — cleaner pledge/mortgage registration reduces collateral risk; AML compliance cost offset by data-quality gain. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Defence industry</strong> (Saab, BAE Bofors): Neutral on accountability measures; benefits from general Ukraine support sustaining procurement trajectory. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Tech / publishing sector</strong>: Interest in accessibility compliance (KU32 e-books, streaming, e-commerce); mixed — cost of implementation vs market-expansion opportunity. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Media</strong> (Bonnier, Schibsted, Stampen): <strong>Concerned about KU33</strong> — see risk of source-erosion affecting investigative desks. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--5-civil-society">🌐 5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--5-civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">🌐 5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Press-freedom organisations</strong> (TU, Utgivarna, SJF, Publicistklubben):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>KU33: <strong>Strongly concerned</strong> — pre-filing remissvar urged; will monitor Lagrådet yttrande closely <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -1919,7 +1919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--5-civil-society">🌐 5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>CU27: Supportive of six-month folkbokförd rule — closes ombildning ghost-tenant loophole <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--6-international-actors">🌍 6. International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--6-international-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-actors">🌍 6. International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--6-international-actors">🌍 6. International Actors<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Ukraine Props Position</th><th align="center">KU33 Position</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Central proponent</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td>Hague Convention signed Dec 16 2025 with Zelensky present</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Framework body</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td>Tribunal legitimacy backstop; Venice Commission may later comment on KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU institutions</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly supportive</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral (supportive of KU32 via EAA)</td><td>Foreign-policy alignment; EAA compliance box ticked</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NATO allies</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Positive</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Sweden's norm-entrepreneurship as new member</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 Hostile</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Will respond rhetorically + hybrid ops</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Ambiguous</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Historical ICC reluctance; tribunal-specific position pending</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RSF / Freedom House</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Will scrutinise</strong></td><td>Sweden's press-freedom index score at risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet</strong>: Pending yttrande — the most consequential upcoming stakeholder signal; will scope the interpretive boundary of KU33</li>
 <li><strong>KU (Konstitutionsutskottet)</strong>: Self-reviewing; committee record has constitutional weight</li>
@@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Co
 <li><strong>ICC</strong>: Complementary relationship — HD03231 fills aggression-jurisdiction gap</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-media--public-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Swedish mainstream media</strong> (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen, SVT):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU33</strong>: Extensive editorial engagement expected — press freedom is a live newsroom stake <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -1994,7 +1994,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class
 <p><strong>International media</strong> (Reuters, AP, AFP, FT, NYT): HD03231 will be picked up globally; KU33 secondary but noted by press-freedom beats (CPJ, RSF blog). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Social media</strong>: Ukraine solidarity performs; KU33 likely to generate polarised engagement patterns — attentive-voter / activist clusters dominate. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-impact-summary">🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-impact-summary">🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-impact-summary">🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Package</th><th align="center">Coalition Risk</th><th align="center">Second-Reading Risk (KU33 only)</th><th align="center">Campaign Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Constitutional (KU32/KU33)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Low (first reading secured)</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> — depends on post-election composition</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH — KU33 salient wedge</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine Accountability</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Minimal</td><td align="center">N/A (ordinary law)</td><td align="center">🟢 Low — universal consensus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Housing (CU27/CU28)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Minimal</td><td align="center">N/A</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-map">🕸️ Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-map">🕸️ Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Gov["Government Triangle"]
         PM["👤 Kristersson PM (M)"]
@@ -2110,7 +2110,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-map">🕸️ Influence-Network Map<a class="" a
     style Ms fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style Mu fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading">🌲 Coalition-Fracture Probability Tree (KU33 Second Reading)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading">🌲 Coalition-Fracture Probability Tree (KU33 Second Reading)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T["🟡 Post-Sep 2026 Election"]
     T --> COMP{"Riksdag&#x3C;br/>composition"}
@@ -2145,8 +2145,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading">🌲 Coalit
 <li><strong>P(revised / stricter language path)</strong> ≈ <strong>0.15</strong></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-named-actor-briefing-cards">🎙️ Named-Actor Briefing Cards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-named-actor-briefing-cards"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader">Card 1 — Magdalena Andersson (S, former PM, current party leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actor-briefing-cards">🎙️ Named-Actor Briefing Cards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-briefing-cards"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader">Card 1 — Magdalena Andersson (S, former PM, current party leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position (projected)</strong>: Pragmatic — likely supports constitutional-integrity framing of KU33 if Lagrådet scopes strictly</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Decisive for second-reading coalition</li>
@@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader">Card 1
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: First major speech after Lagrådet yttrande</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — S-internal dynamics are fluid</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister">Card 2 — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister">Card 2 — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Owner of investigative-integrity rationale for KU33</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Defines how "formellt tillförd bevisning" is prosecutorially applied</li>
@@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister">Card 2 — Gunnar Ström
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Guidance to prosecutors post-amendment</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective">Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective">Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Constitutional review body</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: <strong>Single most consequential upcoming signal</strong> in this run</li>
@@ -2170,7 +2170,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective">Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)<a cla
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Yttrande text on "formellt tillförd bevisning"</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader">Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader">Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Committed KU33 opposition; press-freedom framing</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Amplify attentive-voter mobilisation on press-freedom issue</li>
@@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader">Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V lea
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Campaign launch speech + KU33 salience in polling</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm">Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm">Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Ukraine accountability architect; Nuremberg-framing author</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Sweden's foreign-policy capital + norm-entrepreneurship credentials</li>
@@ -2186,7 +2186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm">Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenerg
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Dec 2026 annual foreign-policy speech</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader">Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader">Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Parliamentary-support leverage on all four clusters</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: 9–10% campaign talking-point reserves</li>
@@ -2197,7 +2197,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader">Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD lea
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2228,7 +2228,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative, surface wildcards, and assign prior probabilities analysts can update as forward indicators fire.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scenario-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scenario-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-17&#x3C;br/>KU first reading"]
     L["⚖️ Lagrådet yttrande&#x3C;br/>Q2 2026"]
@@ -2277,8 +2277,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p>Probabilities are <strong>analyst priors</strong> expressed in a zero-sum tree. They will be Bayesian-updated as Lagrådet and polling signals arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Proportionate Reform" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Proportionate Reform" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande calibrates the interpretation; government retains majority; S leadership endorses amendment; second reading passes.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals confirming this scenario:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Pro
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH — this is the DIW-consistent central projection.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020">🔵 BULL-LITE — "Cross-Party Constitutional Statesmanship" (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020">🔵 BULL-LITE — "Cross-Party Constitutional Statesmanship" (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: S takes leadership, negotiates <strong>stricter interpretive language</strong> into the amendment before second reading. Amendment passes with S+M+KD+L+C joint stamp.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020">🔵 BUL
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Watch</strong>: S-internal dynamics (Tage Erlander / Olof Palme tradition vs law-and-order wing).</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015">🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading Collapse" (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015">🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading Collapse" (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Left bloc gains in Sep 2026 election; V+MP+S-left majority blocks KU33 at second reading.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015">🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading
 <li>Opposition governing in 2026–2030 faces coalition-composition challenges on Ukraine, housing, defence</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005">🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005">🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet ambivalent; amendment passes; over 5+ years narrow interpretation entrenches in förvaltningsdomstol.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005">🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift
 <p><strong>Consequences</strong>: Long-tail democratic-infrastructure harm without acute crisis — the <strong>slow-rot scenario</strong> that's hardest to counter politically.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this scenario matters</strong>: It is the most likely path for S4 × T1 interference to become T4 (systemic chilling).</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Crisis" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Crisis" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: A high-profile case emerges (2026–2028) where investigative journalism was materially blocked by KU33 interpretation.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade:</strong></p>
 <ol>
@@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Cri
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Probability reasoning</strong>: Moderate baseline × chilling-effect prior; elevated if Lagrådet leaves language loose.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "Russian Hybrid Escalation Reshapes Campaign" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "Russian Hybrid Escalation Reshapes Campaign" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: Major cyber / sabotage / disinformation event attributable to Russia during 2026 campaign — e.g., attack on Swedish government infrastructure, Nordic energy / data cable, or large-scale disinformation op.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade:</strong></p>
 <ol>
@@ -2366,7 +2366,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010">⚡
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Probability reasoning</strong>: Historical pattern after Sweden's NATO accession + tribunal founding-member status; SÄPO 2024 assessment signals elevated baseline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities--rolled-up">🧮 Scenario Probabilities — Rolled Up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities--rolled-up"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities--rolled-up">🧮 Scenario Probabilities — Rolled Up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities--rolled-up"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities--rolled-up">🧮 Scenario Probabilities — R
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outcome</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 enters force in any form</td><td align="center"><strong>0.67</strong> (Base 0.42 + Bull-Lite 0.20 + Mixed 0.05)</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 enters force with strict / narrow-test lock-in</td><td align="center"><strong>0.55</strong> (Base 0.42 × strict-interpretation share + Bull-Lite 0.20)</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 fails in post-election Riksdag</td><td align="center"><strong>0.15</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom-index downgrade within 3 years</td><td align="center"><strong>0.25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid event reshapes campaign</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal achieves first case by 2028</td><td align="center"><strong>0.55</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal stalled or boycotted</td><td align="center"><strong>0.30</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors">🎯 Monitoring Indicators (What Flips Priors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors">🎯 Monitoring Indicators (What Flips Priors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors">🎯 Monitoring Indicators
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Direction</th><th align="center">Prior-Update Magnitude</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande strict</td><td align="center">↑ Base, Bull-Lite</td><td align="center">+0.15 combined</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet silent on interpretation</td><td align="center">↑ Mixed, Wildcard-1</td><td align="center">+0.10 combined</td></tr><tr><td>S party-leader pro-KU33 speech</td><td align="center">↑ Base, Bull-Lite</td><td align="center">+0.10</td></tr><tr><td>S party-leader anti-KU33 speech</td><td align="center">↑ Bear</td><td align="center">+0.10</td></tr><tr><td>RSF/Freedom House downgrade</td><td align="center">↑ Wildcard-1</td><td align="center">+0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic cable / cyber event</td><td align="center">↑ Wildcard-2</td><td align="center">+0.05–0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Opinion polling: press-freedom > 10 % campaign salience</td><td align="center">↑ Bear</td><td align="center">+0.05</td></tr><tr><td>US public tribunal endorsement</td><td align="center">N/A for KU; ↓ Tribunal-stalled</td><td align="center">−0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine HD03231 commencement date slips > 6 months</td><td align="center">↑ Tribunal-stalled</td><td align="center">+0.10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications">🛠️ Scenario-Driven Editorial &#x26; Policy Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications">🛠️ Scenario-Driven Editorial &#x26; Policy Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2507,7 +2507,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications">🛠️ Scenario-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Editorial Framing Implication</th><th>Policy Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BASE</td><td>Frame as <em>"narrow, proportionate reform"</em>; foreground Lagrådet role</td><td>Government should pre-publish interpretive guidance</td></tr><tr><td>BULL-LITE</td><td>Frame as <em>"constitutional craftsmanship moment"</em>; credit cross-party S</td><td>S/M joint statesmanship opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR</td><td>Frame as <em>"democratic brake working as designed"</em></td><td>Opposition needs clear alternative investigative-integrity plan</td></tr><tr><td>MIXED</td><td>Frame as <em>"interpretive vigilance required"</em>; JO centrality</td><td>NGO litigation fund activation</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD-1</td><td>Frame as <em>"chilling crisis"</em> — accountability lens</td><td>Counter-amendment drafting begins</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD-2</td><td>Frame as <em>"hybrid war changes calculus"</em>; national-security lens</td><td>SÄPO / MSB doctrinal updates</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Red-Team Box informs low-probability path consideration</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Bayesian Update Rules drive scenario priors</li>
@@ -2517,7 +2517,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: Scenario analysis v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RISK-ID</strong></td><td>RSK-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> v3.0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scope</strong></td><td>Constitutional Reforms (PRIMARY) · Ukraine Accountability (SECONDARY) · Housing/AML (TERTIARY)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--aggregate-risk-landscape">🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--aggregate-risk-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregate-risk-landscape">🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-landscape"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Likelihood × Impact (Realtime 1434)
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--aggregate-risk-landscape">🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape<a class="" a
     R10-SD-Ukraine-Reversal: [0.25, 0.75]
     R11-Register-IT-Delivery-Delay: [0.55, 0.70]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-register">🗂️ Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">🗂️ Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2721,8 +2721,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-register">🗂️ Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Risk ID</th><th>Risk Description</th><th align="center">Cluster</th><th align="center">Likelihood (1-5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1-5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Mitigation Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Russian hybrid retaliation (cyber, disinformation, sabotage) against Sweden as tribunal founding member</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td>SÄPO, MSB, NATO StratCom COE</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R2</strong></td><td>KU33's "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation drifts narrow under a future government — systemic transparency loss</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td>Lagrådet, KU (legislative history), Riksdag ombudsman</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Tribunal (HD03231) effectiveness collapses if US refuses cooperation</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>UD, EU External Action Service, Council of Europe</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R4</strong></td><td>KU32's EU-obligation template reused to justify further grundlag compression (digital platforms, AI content, national security)</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3-4</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>KU, Riksdag constitutional scholars</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R5</strong></td><td>KU33 weaponised in 2026 valrörelse — polarises press freedom into partisan wedge; second-reading coalition fractures</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>Party leaders, party-strategy teams</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R6</strong></td><td>Reparations commission (HD03232) takes decades → political fatigue erodes Ukraine support</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td>Commission secretariat, UD</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R7</strong></td><td>International press-freedom index (RSF, Freedom House) downgrades Sweden after TF amendments</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td>UD, Sida, press-freedom diplomacy</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R8</strong></td><td>Russia seizes assets of Swedish firms in retaliation</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td>Kommerskollegium, EU sanctions policy</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R9</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet register (HD01CU28) IT procurement delayed or suffers data-security breach</td><td align="center">Housing</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td>Lantmäteriet, MSB, Finansdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>SD reverses Ukraine support in 2026 campaign (populist realignment)</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">1-2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>7</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td>Coalition monitoring, cross-party statesmanship</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R11</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet register (HD01CU28) IT delivery delay or procurement slippage → 2027 rollout misses statutory deadline</td><td align="center">Housing</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>Lantmäteriet, Finansdepartementet, MSB</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R12</strong></td><td>KU32 accessibility implementation cost exceeds impact assessment → business pushback</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>4</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td>MPRT, Näringsdepartementet</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive">🔴 Priority Risks (Score ≥ 12) — Deep Dive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score 16, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive">🔴 Priority Risks (Score ≥ 12) — Deep Dive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score 16, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Russia has conducted hybrid operations against NATO members following Ukraine-support decisions. Sweden's NATO accession (March 2024) combined with founding-member status in the aggression tribunal and reparations commission creates enhanced targeting.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2739,7 +2739,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence">R1 — Russian H
 <li>MSB cyber-incident bulletins</li>
 <li>Nordic infrastructure events (cables, power, logistics)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence">R2 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation Entrenchment (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence">R2 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation Entrenchment (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: HD01KU33 preserves "allmän handling" status for seized digital material <strong>only</strong> when it is <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive boundary of "formally incorporated" is <strong>legislatively underspecified</strong> in the public summary. A future government (or shift in prosecutorial practice) could apply a narrow test, functionally shielding large volumes of seized material from offentlighetsprincipen.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2754,7 +2754,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidenc
 <li><strong>Post-vote</strong> (2027-): JO/JK oversight; annual press-freedom reporting; NGO litigation in förvaltningsdomstol.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Bayesian update trigger</strong>: If Lagrådet yttrande is silent on the interpretive test, update likelihood 3 → 4 (score to 16).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence">R3 — Tribunal Effectiveness Without US (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence">R3 — Tribunal Effectiveness Without US (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: The International Criminal Court illustrates the effectiveness cost of US non-participation. Public US statements on HD03231 have been cautious. The tribunal can still operate as a legitimacy platform and set precedent, but enforcement against high-value defendants becomes dependent on arrest-state cooperation.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2762,7 +2762,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence">R3
 <li>Recent US reticence on similar jurisdictional innovations <code>[MEDIUM]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: EU coalition-building; Council of Europe framework provides legitimacy backstop; G7 asset-policy coordination.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence">R5 — KU33 Campaign Weaponisation (Score 12, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence">R5 — KU33 Campaign Weaponisation (Score 12, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: V/MP have strong press-freedom commitments and will foreground KU33 in the 2026 campaign. S's leadership has signalled mixed positions — if the S leadership moves against KU33, the second-reading coalition fractures.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2772,7 +2772,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence">R5 — KU33
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Cross-party statesmanship; early Lagrådet yttrande; NGO engagement by government to pre-empt legitimate concerns.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-trend--7-day">📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-trend--7-day"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-trend--7-day">📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trend--7-day"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'themeVariables': {'xyChart': {'plotColorPalette': '#D32F2F'}}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Composite Political Risk — April 10-17, 2026"
@@ -2786,7 +2786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-trend--7-day">📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <li>Apr 16-17 — Ukraine propositions + KU betänkanden compound into highest reading of week</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-rules">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2842,7 +2842,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Observable Signal</th><th align="center">Direction</th><th align="center">Risk Affected</th><th align="center">Magnitude</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande strict on KU33</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R2</td><td align="center">−4</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande silent on KU33 interpretation</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">R2</td><td align="center">+4</td></tr><tr><td>S-leadership statement supporting KU33</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R5</td><td align="center">−3</td></tr><tr><td>S-leadership statement opposing KU33</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">R5</td><td align="center">+3</td></tr><tr><td>US public statement supporting HD03231</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R3</td><td align="center">−4</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic cable-sabotage or cyber event</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">R1</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr><tr><td>RSF Sweden score unchanged post-amendment</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R7</td><td align="center">−2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation">🧮 Bayesian Prior / Posterior Illustration — Risk R2 (KU33 Narrow Interpretation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation">🧮 Bayesian Prior / Posterior Illustration — Risk R2 (KU33 Narrow Interpretation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2889,7 +2889,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpre
 <p><strong>Interpretation</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Risk R2 is <strong>most sensitive to Lagrådet yttrande content</strong>. The expected posterior after strict yttrande drops R2 by 4 points; silent yttrande raises R2 by 4 points. This makes the Lagrådet yttrande the single most consequential upcoming monitoring indicator — it can move a risk by ± 33% of its scale in a single trigger.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     R1["R1 Russian hybrid&#x3C;br/>16/25"]
     R2["R2 KU33 narrow interp&#x3C;br/>12/25"]
@@ -2931,7 +2931,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a
 <li><strong>R3 and R4 co-vary</strong>: US tribunal non-cooperation directly extends the compensation-commission timeline</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2968,7 +2968,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk Tier</th><th align="center">Score Band</th><th align="center">ALARP Status</th><th>Action Requirement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Critical (red)</strong></td><td align="center">16–25</td><td align="center">❌ UNACCEPTABLE without treatment</td><td>Immediate mitigation plan; executive review; published watch-list</td></tr><tr><td><strong>High (orange)</strong></td><td align="center">12–15</td><td align="center">⚠️ ALARP — treatment required</td><td>Documented mitigation; Bayesian update cadence defined</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Medium (yellow)</strong></td><td align="center">7–11</td><td align="center">🟡 ALARP — monitor</td><td>Owner assigned; quarterly review</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Low (green)</strong></td><td align="center">1–6</td><td align="center">✅ Accept</td><td>Monitor through standard bulletins</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-applied-to-this-run">Applied to this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-applied-to-this-run"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-applied-to-this-run">Applied to this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-applied-to-this-run"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3048,7 +3048,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-applied-to-this-run">Applied to this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Treatment Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1 Russian hybrid</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">🔴 Critical</td><td>SÄPO / MSB active posture; partnership with Nordic/Baltic services; ALARP reached with active mitigation</td></tr><tr><td>R2 KU33 narrow interpretation</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO remissvar; strict-interpretation legislative-record lobbying</td></tr><tr><td>R3 US non-cooperation tribunal</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>EU coalition-building; UK + Nordic engagement; diplomatic insurance</td></tr><tr><td>R5 KU33 campaign weaponisation</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>Government narrative discipline; Nordic-comparison framing preparation</td></tr><tr><td>R11 Register IT delivery delay</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>Lantmäteriet procurement oversight; Riksrevisionen audit scheduling</td></tr><tr><td>R7 RSF-index downgrade</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">🟡 Medium</td><td>Monitor; early-indicator reporting</td></tr><tr><td>R4 Reparations timeline slip</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">🟡 Medium</td><td>Institutional-continuity investment</td></tr><tr><td>R8 Russian asset retaliation</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">🟡 Medium</td><td>Swedish business continuity planning</td></tr><tr><td>R9 Register cyber-incident</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td><td>MSB baseline controls</td></tr><tr><td>R6 Reparations fatigue</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td><td>Standard political messaging</td></tr><tr><td>R10 SD Ukraine realignment</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td><td>Standard political monitoring</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-velocity-rate-of-change">🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-velocity-rate-of-change"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-velocity-rate-of-change">🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-velocity-rate-of-change"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3100,7 +3100,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-velocity-rate-of-change">🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)<a
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3144,9 +3144,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SWOT-ID</strong></td><td>SWT-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Scope</strong></td><td>Primary: Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33). Secondary: Ukraine Accountability Package (HD03231 + HD03232). Tertiary: Housing/AML (HD01CU27 + HD01CU28)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reference Period</strong></td><td>2025/26 Riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-realtime-monitor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code>, <code>get_propositioner</code>, <code>search_regering</code>, <code>search_dokument</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>political-swot-framework v3.0 (TOWS interference applied)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope">🏛️ Section 1 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (PRIMARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope">🏛️ Section 1 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (PRIMARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope"></a></h3>
 <p>Scope: HD01KU32 (media accessibility amendment to TF + YGL) and HD01KU33 (removal of "allmän handling" status from digital material seized at husrannsakan). First reading only; second reading required post-2026 election for entry into force (proposed 2027-01-01).</p>
-<h3 id="rm--strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position">✅ Strengths — Government &#x26; Constitutional Framework Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position">✅ Strengths — Government &#x26; Constitutional Framework Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3201,7 +3201,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position">✅ Streng
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id / source)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>KU secured cross-party support for <strong>first reading</strong> of two grundlag amendments — politically rare achievement</td><td>KU committee record; HD01KU32, HD01KU33 betänkanden</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>KU32 discharges a clear <strong>EU legal obligation</strong> (Accessibility Act 2019/882, in force since June 2025) — forecloses infringement-proceeding risk</td><td>HD01KU32 betänkande; EAA 2019/882</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>KU33 solves a <strong>concrete investigative problem</strong> — premature disclosure of seized digital material was compromising ongoing criminal investigations (gäng-/organised-crime cases)</td><td>HD01KU33 rationale; police operational experience</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Narrow carve-out design — "allmän handling" status retained when material is formally incorporated as evidence — provides <strong>textual safeguard</strong></td><td>HD01KU33 text</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Disability-rights framing (KU32) unifies M/KD/L/C/MP/L and neutralises opposition</td><td>KU32 committee support pattern</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks">⚠️ Weaknesses — Democratic-Infrastructure Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks">⚠️ Weaknesses — Democratic-Infrastructure Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3256,7 +3256,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks">⚠️ Weaknesses 
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing</strong> of TF's offentlighetsprincip in the digital-evidence sphere — compresses a 260-year-old transparency guarantee (TF 1766)</td><td>TF 1766 text; KU33 betänkande comparison; press-freedom literature</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Definition of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" is <strong>interpretively fragile</strong> — a future government interpreting narrowly could systematically shield police operations from insyn</td><td>HD01KU33 text; förvaltningsrätt interpretation risk</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>KU32 establishes <strong>precedent</strong> that EU obligations can justify ordinary-law intrusion into grundlag sphere — template for future grundlag compression (digital services, platform regulation)</td><td>HD01KU32 structural change; EAA implementation pattern</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Timing places constitutional press-freedom debate <strong>inside 2026 campaign</strong> — politicising grundlag in a way previous amendments were shielded from</td><td>8 kap. 14 § RF two-reading rule; election cycle</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>Lagrådet review still pending at publication — constitutional craftsmanship not yet independently vetted</td><td>Lagrådet process</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--opportunities--democratic-upside">🚀 Opportunities — Democratic Upside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities--democratic-upside"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities--democratic-upside">🚀 Opportunities — Democratic Upside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities--democratic-upside"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3303,7 +3303,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--opportunities--democratic-upside">🚀 Opportunities — Democratic
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Sweden continues to <strong>modernise world's oldest press-freedom framework</strong> — balancing investigative integrity with transparency; could become model for other democracies facing digital-evidence dilemmas</td><td>TF 1766 text; comparative press-freedom research</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>KU32 improves real-world accessibility (e-books, streaming, e-commerce) for ~1.5M Swedes with disabilities — <strong>tangible human-rights delivery</strong></td><td>EAA 2019/882 impact assessments</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>Strengthened investigative integrity (KU33) → improved <strong>organised-crime prosecution</strong> outcomes; feeds government's gäng-agenda policy coherence</td><td>Gäng-agenda policy framework</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Second-reading moment after election = <strong>democratic stress-test</strong> — new Riksdag's democratic bona fides judged by how it handles KU33</td><td>8 kap. RF</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--threats--democratic-downside">🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats--democratic-downside"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats--democratic-downside">🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--democratic-downside"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3359,7 +3359,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--threats--democratic-downside">🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td><strong>Chilling effect on investigative journalism</strong> — sources may fear material seized at husrannsakan becomes un-inspectable; possible source-protection erosion</td><td>SJF, Utgivarna press-freedom doctrine; historical journalist-source patterns</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td><strong>Campaign instrumentalisation</strong> of KU33 by opposition — V, MP, S-left may frame government as press-freedom revisionist; could harden into political polarisation</td><td>2026 valrörelse dynamics</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td><strong>International press-freedom index</strong> erosion signal — Reporters Without Borders and similar indices may downgrade Sweden's score based on TF amendment, weakening soft-power posture (especially vis-à-vis Ukraine-tribunal leadership rhetoric — see Cluster 2 tension)</td><td>RSF methodology; comparable index events</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td><strong>Slippery-slope</strong> grundlag compression: KU32's EU-obligation template + KU33's investigative-integrity template, combined, could be used to justify further TF/YGL narrowings on digital platforms, AI content moderation, or national-security grounds</td><td>Grundlag erosion pattern analysis</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td><strong>Second-reading failure</strong> if post-election Riksdag has V/MP-strengthened left majority — amendments fall, but government loses political capital</td><td>Opinion polling; mandate distribution scenarios</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded">📊 SWOT Quadrant Mapping — Constitutional Reforms (Color-Coded)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded">📊 SWOT Quadrant Mapping — Constitutional Reforms (Color-Coded)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["Political SWOT — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) — LEAD"]
         direction TB
@@ -3415,7 +3415,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded">📊 SWOT
     style T4N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T5N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster">🔀 TOWS Interference Matrix — Constitutional Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster">🔀 TOWS Interference Matrix — Constitutional Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3467,7 +3467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster">🔀 TOWS Interfer
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Cross-SWOT interference finding</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong> of the constitutional package is the interpretation of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" (S4 / W2). If Lagrådet and Riksdag's legislative history lock in a strict interpretation, KU33 functions as a narrow, proportionate reform and T1/T3/T4 largely dissipate. If the language is left loose, T1+T4 combine into a durable democratic-infrastructure threat. <strong>Recommendation</strong>: press-freedom NGOs and opposition parties should make a <strong>strict interpretive record</strong> the price of second-reading support.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm--cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine">🔗 Cross-Cluster Tension — Constitutional × Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine">🔗 Cross-Cluster Tension — Constitutional × Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3485,8 +3485,8 @@ <h3 id="rm--cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine">🔗 Cross-Cluster T
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tension</th><th>Description</th><th>Strategic Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Rhetorical coherence</strong></td><td>Government simultaneously championing HD03231 (aggression-tribunal — implicitly valorises press freedom, journalists documenting war crimes) while narrowing TF via HD01KU33</td><td>Opposition parties can <strong>weaponise the inconsistency</strong>: "Sweden defends press freedom abroad while compressing it at home." Government counter: KU33 is narrow and investigation-specific, not a press-freedom retreat.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope">🌍 Section 2 — Ukraine Accountability Package (SECONDARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope">🌍 Section 2 — Ukraine Accountability Package (SECONDARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3528,7 +3528,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Sweden <strong>founding member</strong> of first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg (HD03231)</td><td>HD03231; Stenergard press release</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Cross-party Riksdag consensus (all 8 parties historically supported Ukraine measures since 2022)</td><td>Ukrainepaket voting record 2022-2025</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td><strong>No direct Swedish fiscal burden</strong> for reparations — funded from Russian immobilised assets (~EUR 260B; EUR 191B at Euroclear)</td><td>HD03232; G7 Ukraine Loan</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Sweden's post-NATO (March 2024) norm-entrepreneurship credentials reinforced</td><td>HD03231; NATO accession context</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3563,7 +3563,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>Enforcement depends on non-member cooperation (US, China, Russia not expected to join)</td><td>ICC precedent; US historical reluctance</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Reparations timeline may span decades (Iraq UNCC: 31 years, $52B)</td><td>UNCC historical record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>Sitting-HoS immunity gap in international law</td><td>Rome Statute 2017 amendment limits</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3591,7 +3591,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Closes Nuremberg gap in modern international criminal law</td><td>First aggression tribunal since 1945-46</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Reconstruction-governance voice (USD 486B+ damages per World Bank 2024)</td><td>HD03232; World Bank RDNA</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3627,7 +3627,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Russian hybrid warfare intensifies against Sweden as tribunal founder</td><td>Nordic sabotage events 2024; "unfriendly state" designation</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>US defection from asset immobilisation undermines enforcement (EUR 191B at Euroclear)</td><td>Transatlantic policy volatility</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Tribunal legitimacy erosion if boycotted by key states</td><td>ICC 124 states parties, major absences</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope">🏠 Section 3 — Housing Reforms (TERTIARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope">🏠 Section 3 — Housing Reforms (TERTIARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3667,7 +3667,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope">🏠 Section 3 — Housin
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>THR-ID</strong></td><td>THR-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>STRIDE (political-adapted) + <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scope</strong></td><td>Constitutional Reforms (LEAD) · Ukraine Accountability · Housing/AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus">🌳 Attack-Tree — Democratic-Infrastructure Threats (KU33 Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus">🌳 Attack-Tree — Democratic-Infrastructure Threats (KU33 Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Erode TF transparency&#x3C;br/>post KU33 entry into force"]
     A1["A1 Narrow interpretation&#x3C;br/>of formellt tillförd bevisning"]
@@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus">🌳 Atta
     style A3 fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style A4 fill:#FFC107,color:#000000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-register">🎭 Threat Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-register">🎭 Threat Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-register">🎭 Threat Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Cluster</th><th>Actor</th><th>Method / TTP</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>Future gov / prosecutorial practice / förvaltningsrätt</td><td>Interpretation drift; administrative discretion without legislative-history anchor</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Campaign weaponisation of KU33</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>V, MP, S-left; journalism NGOs</td><td>Framing amendment as press-freedom regression; 2026 valrörelse talking points</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Slippery-slope via KU32 EU-obligation template</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>Future legislation (digital platforms, AI, national security)</td><td>Re-use of EU-obligation → grundlag-compression template</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Source-chilling effect on investigative journalism</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>Structural / systemic</td><td>Source avoidance of physical evidence handover; reduced tips to journalists</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>Russian diplomatic pressure</strong> (post-HD03231/232)</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>RF MFA</td><td>Official protests, diplomatic notes; status quo pattern since 2022</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 MONITOR</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid warfare</strong> (cyber, disinformation, sabotage)</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>GRU, SVR, FSB</td><td>Cyber ops on SE gov infra; disinformation in valrörelse; Nordic infrastructure sabotage</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal legal counter-challenges</strong></td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>Russia + sympathetic fora</td><td>Jurisdictional challenges; forum shopping</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Ukraine fatigue narrative</strong></td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>Domestic populist actors</td><td>Framing continued engagement as economically costly</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MONITOR</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T9</strong></td><td><strong>Property-register cyber attack</strong> (post-Jan 2027)</td><td align="center">Housing</td><td>State + criminal actors</td><td>Data exfiltration from Lantmäteriet; ransomware</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T10</strong></td><td><strong>International press-freedom index downgrade</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>RSF, Freedom House</td><td>Downgrade of Sweden post-TF amendment; reputational blowback for UD press-freedom diplomacy</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-mapping-political-adaptation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-mapping-political-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-mapping-political-adaptation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3907,33 +3907,33 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th align="center">Threat ID(s)</th><th>Political Translation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td align="center">T6</td><td>Disinformation campaigns impersonating Swedish authorities during valrörelse</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td align="center">T1, T3</td><td>Interpretive tampering with KU33 test; legal-template tampering via KU32 precedent</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td align="center">T7</td><td>Russia repudiates tribunal jurisdiction</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation Disclosure</td><td align="center">T4, T9</td><td>Chilling effect suppresses legitimate disclosure; cyber attacks force illegitimate disclosure</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td align="center">T6, T9</td><td>Cyber ops against gov infrastructure; register DoS</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of Privilege</td><td align="center">T1, T3</td><td>Administrative actors obtain grundlag-level discretion by interpretive creep</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority-Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority">T1 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority-Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority">T1 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Pre-vote</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande must explicitly scope "formellt tillförd bevisning" test</li>
 <li><strong>Pre-vote</strong>: KU committee record should document legislator intent (strict interpretation)</li>
 <li><strong>Post-vote</strong>: JO/JK annual reporting on KU33 application; NGO monitoring framework</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate">T2 — Campaign Weaponisation (MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate">T2 — Campaign Weaponisation (MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Cross-party leadership statements on KU33 (avoid partisan capture)</li>
 <li>Early NGO engagement (SJF, Utgivarna, TU) to co-design interpretive guardrails</li>
 <li>Government transparency commitment: annual published summary of KU33 applications</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority">T6 — Russian Hybrid (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority">T6 — Russian Hybrid (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SÄPO reinforced posture during valrörelse</li>
 <li>NCSC continuous monitoring of gov infrastructure</li>
 <li>NATO CCDCOE and StratCom COE coordination</li>
 <li>MSB public-awareness campaign on information-operation tactics</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active">T3 / T10 — Slippery-Slope + Index Downgrade (ACTIVE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active">T3 / T10 — Slippery-Slope + Index Downgrade (ACTIVE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>UD press-freedom diplomacy pre-brief RSF/Freedom House on amendment scope</li>
 <li>Constitutional scholars' commentary positioned for international audiences</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">🧪 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-severity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-severity-matrix">🧪 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Threat Severity — Realtime 1434
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -3953,7 +3953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">🧪 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-
     T9-Register-Cyber: [0.70, 0.30]
     T10-Index-Downgrade: [0.55, 0.50]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6">🎯 Cyber-Kill-Chain Adaptation — Hybrid-Warfare Scenario (T6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6">🎯 Cyber-Kill-Chain Adaptation — Hybrid-Warfare Scenario (T6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Adapting the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain (Hutchins et al. 2011) to Russian hybrid-warfare targeting of Sweden after HD03231 founding-member status.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3975,7 +3975,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6">🎯 Cyber-
     style IN fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style CC fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style AC fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb">Kill-Chain Specific Indicators (for SÄPO / MSB)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb">Kill-Chain Specific Indicators (for SÄPO / MSB)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4032,7 +4032,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb">Kill-Chain Specific In
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Observable</th><th>Sensor</th><th align="center">Detection Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Reconnaissance</td><td>OSINT scraping of Riksdag / UD / SÄPO personnel; social-engineering LinkedIn contacts</td><td>MSB CERT; SÄPO</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>2. Weaponisation</td><td>Fake-document kit prepared; deepfake/audio tooling activity</td><td>Signals intel</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>3. Delivery</td><td>Spear-phishing against key officials; subsea-cable anomalies; suspicious vessel tracking; bot-network seeding</td><td>MSB, Kustbevakningen, MUST</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>4. Exploitation</td><td>Account compromise; narrative traction (Twitter/X, TikTok)</td><td>Internal IR teams; civil-society monitors</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>5. Installation</td><td>Persistent access (implants, dormant accounts); long-term troll-network warm-up</td><td>SÄPO, FRA</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>6. C2</td><td>Beaconing patterns; coordinated amplification campaigns</td><td>FRA, Graphika / civil-society</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>7. Actions</td><td>DoS on Swedish infrastructure; public-opinion shift; specific policy reversal attempts</td><td>Broad sensor set</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Defence posture</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The defensive goal is interception <strong>before stage 5</strong> (Installation). Post-Installation displacement costs are an order of magnitude higher than pre-Installation prevention.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid">🔺 Diamond Model — Adversary Profile (T6 Russian Hybrid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid">🔺 Diamond Model — Adversary Profile (T6 Russian Hybrid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Diamond["Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Threat Actor"]
         ADV["🎭 ADVERSARY&#x3C;br/>GRU Unit 26165 (APT28)&#x3C;br/>GRU Unit 74455 (Sandworm)&#x3C;br/>FSB Centre 18&#x3C;br/>PMC Wagner-descendent influence ops&#x3C;br/>Internet Research Agency successor entities"]
@@ -4051,7 +4051,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid">🔺 Diamond Mod
     style VIC fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH — mapping consistent with SÄPO annual assessments (2023–25) and FOI / Nordic-Baltic intelligence-sharing findings.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables">🧰 MITRE-Style TTP Library (Hybrid-Warfare Observables)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables">🧰 MITRE-Style TTP Library (Hybrid-Warfare Observables)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4150,7 +4150,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables">🧰 MITRE-Style
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP Code</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Observable in Sweden (2023–25 baseline)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TA-01</td><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Target-list harvesting (LinkedIn, registries)</td><td>Observed — officials, journalists, military</td></tr><tr><td>TA-02</td><td>Resource Development</td><td>Shell-company acquisitions</td><td>Documented (Fastighetsmäklarinspektionen cases)</td></tr><tr><td>TA-03</td><td>Initial Access</td><td>Spear-phishing</td><td>Consistently observed; 2024 SÄPO report</td></tr><tr><td>TA-04</td><td>Persistence</td><td>Dormant accounts, long-cycle troll operators</td><td>Graphika / EUvsDisinfo documentation</td></tr><tr><td>TA-05</td><td>Defense Evasion</td><td>Proxy-state laundering of attribution</td><td>Standard tradecraft</td></tr><tr><td>TA-06</td><td>Credential Access</td><td>Password spraying, credential stuffing</td><td>Routine observation</td></tr><tr><td>TA-07</td><td>Discovery</td><td>Internal lateral mapping post-compromise</td><td>Routine in compromised-account investigations</td></tr><tr><td>TA-08</td><td>Lateral Movement</td><td>Email-chain compromise</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td>TA-09</td><td>Collection</td><td>Document exfiltration</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td>TA-10</td><td>C2</td><td>Telegram channels, alternative platforms</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td>TA-11</td><td>Exfiltration</td><td>Dead drops via cloud services</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TA-12</strong></td><td><strong>Impact — Narrative</strong></td><td><strong>Coordinated disinformation campaigns</strong></td><td><strong>Observed and escalating 2022→2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>TA-13</strong></td><td><strong>Impact — Physical</strong></td><td><strong>Cable-cutting, GPS spoofing, migration instrumentalisation</strong></td><td><strong>Elevated 2023–24</strong></td></tr><tr><td>TA-14</td><td>Impact — Legal</td><td>SLAPP / GDPR-abuse litigation</td><td>Observed in Nordic context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Cross-reference</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Compare with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Diplomatic Response Patterns — Estonia (2022–), Finland (2023–), Netherlands (sustained). Sweden's expected pattern interpolates between Finland and Netherlands severity.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-defensive-recommendations-prioritised">🛡️ Defensive Recommendations (Prioritised)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-defensive-recommendations-prioritised"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-defensive-recommendations-prioritised">🛡️ Defensive Recommendations (Prioritised)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-defensive-recommendations-prioritised"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4209,7 +4209,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-defensive-recommendations-prioritised">🛡️ Defensive Recommen
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27-cu28">HD01CU27-CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27-cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4249,7 +4249,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27-cu28">HD01CU27-CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok IDs</strong></td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 (Civilutskottet betänkanden 2025/26:CU27 &#x26; CU28)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Civilutskottet (CU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Area</strong></td><td>Housing / Property Law / Anti-Money-Laundering (AML)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>CU28: 5.8 · CU27: 5.4 · <strong>DIW</strong> CU28 ×1.00 = 5.80 · CU27 ×1.05 = 5.67</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in this run</strong></td><td>🏠 Secondary (tertiary within dossier)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>🟠 <strong>L2 Strategic</strong> (upgraded from L1 in reference-grade iteration)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture">1. Political Significance — A Coherent Housing-Market Integrity + Organised-Crime Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture">1. Political Significance — A Coherent Housing-Market Integrity + Organised-Crime Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture"></a></h3>
 <p>These two betänkanden are <strong>individually tertiary</strong> in this run's DIW ranking but <strong>collectively important</strong> because they institutionalise a <strong>housing-market-integrity + anti-money-laundering</strong> architecture that:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Closes a known loophole</strong> in the <em>ombildning</em> (rental → bostadsrätt conversion) process (CU27)</li>
@@ -4261,8 +4261,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organi
 <p><strong>Cross-cluster insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: CU27 + CU28 form a <em>rhetorical unit</em> with KU33 — all three invoke organised-crime integrity. Opposition actors (V, MP, civil-liberties NGOs) can exploit this coupling by framing the trio as <strong>"coordinated surveillance-adjacent creep"</strong>. Government actors conversely frame it as <strong>"coherent institutional modernisation"</strong>. Both framings are available; 2026 valrörelse will choose.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register">2. HD01CU28 — National Condominium Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-21-mechanism">2.1 Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-mechanism"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register">2. HD01CU28 — National Condominium Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-mechanism">2.1 Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-mechanism"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Creates a <strong>new national register of all bostadsrätter</strong> (cooperative apartments/condominiums)</li>
 <li>Register contains:
@@ -4277,7 +4277,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-mechanism">2.1 Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-
 <li><strong>Operator</strong>: Lantmäteriet</li>
 <li><strong>Effective dates</strong>: Register setup <strong>Jan 1 2027</strong>; other operational provisions per government decision</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-22-context-and-scale-high">2.2 Context and Scale <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-context-and-scale-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-context-and-scale-high">2.2 Context and Scale <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-context-and-scale-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>≈ <strong>2 million bostadsrätter</strong> — one of Sweden's most common housing forms</li>
 <li>Absence of unified register has been repeatedly criticised since 2010s:
@@ -4290,7 +4290,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-22-context-and-scale-high">2.2 Context and Scale <code>[HIGH]</code><
 <li>Financial sector (SEB, Swedbank, Handelsbanken, SBAB, Nordea) has lobbied for register since mid-2010s</li>
 <li>SOU-ledda utredning underpinning this reform: estimate SOU 2023/24 (precise reference pending public availability)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4333,8 +4333,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Finding</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Legal</strong></td><td>Straightforward ordinary-law reform; no grundlag engagement; integrates into existing fastighetsregister doctrine</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral</strong></td><td>Low salience but broad consumer-positive framing; cross-party support expected</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic</strong></td><td>Cleaner credit market; reduced collateral risk; ≈ SEK 100–300M annual pledge-registration fees (estimated); Lantmäteriet IT procurement cost</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security</strong></td><td>Closes AML blind spot; contributes to organised-crime architecture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data-protection</strong></td><td>Centralised register of sensitive financial data → cyber-target; see R9 and T9</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Implementation</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet IT procurement timeline: tight for Jan 2027 target</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform">3. HD01CU27 — Identity Requirements + Ombildning Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande">3.1 Mechanism — Two Reforms in One Betänkande<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform">3. HD01CU27 — Identity Requirements + Ombildning Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande">3.1 Mechanism — Two Reforms in One Betänkande<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Reform 1 — Identity Requirements for Lagfart (Property Title Transfer)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Physical persons</strong>: Must supply <strong>personnummer</strong> or <strong>samordningsnummer</strong> when applying for lagfart</li>
@@ -4348,7 +4348,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande">3.1 Mechanism — Two R
 <li><strong>New rule</strong>: Tenant must have been <strong>folkbokförd at the address for ≥ 6 months</strong> to count in the 2/3 calculation</li>
 <li><strong>Anti-fraud rationale</strong>: Closes the "ghost-tenant" loophole where landlords registered cooperative actors at short-notice to manufacture conversion majorities</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-32-context-high">3.2 Context <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-context-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-32-context-high">3.2 Context <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-context-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Ombildning remains politically sensitive — particularly in Stockholm (2010s wave), Göteborg, Malmö</li>
 <li>Hyresgästföreningen has long documented loophole exploitation</li>
@@ -4356,7 +4356,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-32-context-high">3.2 Context <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidd
 <li>Skatteverket Hewlett + SÄPO: property has been a vector for organised-crime laundering — Bitcoin-era enforcement gap</li>
 <li>EU AMLD6 (6th Anti-Money-Laundering Directive) compliance trajectory</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4399,7 +4399,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Finding</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Legal</strong></td><td>Ordinary-law reform; straightforward</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral</strong></td><td>Hyresgästföreningen support; Fastighetsägarna / landlord associations likely neutral-to-opposed; tenant-protection framing positive</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic</strong></td><td>Fewer ombildning conversions on the margin → slight rental-market stabilisation</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Privacy</strong></td><td>Personnummer centralisation increases re-identification risk; standard Swedish doctrine (low sensitivity domestically)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>AML / crime</strong></td><td>Closes known laundering channel</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Implementation</strong></td><td>July 1 2026 deadline is tight; Lantmäteriet administrative burden</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid">4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid">4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["SWOT — CU27 + CU28 Housing / AML Architecture"]
         direction TB
@@ -4451,7 +4451,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid">4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-h
     style T3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-beneficiary-analysis">5. Beneficiary Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-beneficiary-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-beneficiary-analysis">5. Beneficiary Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-beneficiary-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
     "Homebuyers / borrowers" : 30
     "Banks / mortgage lenders" : 25
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-beneficiary-analysis">5. Beneficiary Analysis<a class="" aria-hidde
     "Existing tenants (anti-ombildning-fraud)" : 15
     "Lantmäteriet + Skatteverket" : 10</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">6. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">6. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4593,7 +4593,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">6. Stakeholder Positions — N
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">CU27</th><th align="center">CU28</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Erik Slottner (KD, Civil Affairs)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Government champion</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Crime-fighting alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>AML compliance</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lantmäteriet (Director-General)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4 (execution stress)</td><td>Implementation responsibility</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Skatteverket</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Operational tool</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polismyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>AML enforcement benefit</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finansinspektionen</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>AML supervision</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SEB / Swedbank / Handelsbanken / SBAB / Nordea</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Long-standing sector lobby</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mäklarsamfundet</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Market-transparency benefit</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fastighetsmäklarinspektionen (FMI)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Regulatory clarity</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Hyresgästföreningen</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +2</td><td>Ombildning loophole closure</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fastighetsägarna</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +1</td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Landlord-association mixed</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil-liberties orgs (V-aligned)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 −1</td><td align="center">🟡 −2</td><td>Privacy-centralisation concerns</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Consumer-protection alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td align="center">🟡 +1</td><td>Anti-ombildning-fraud positive; privacy concerns on register</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Transparency positive</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Law-and-order alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-evidence-table">7. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-evidence-table">7. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4678,7 +4678,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-evidence-table">7. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>CU proposes national register for all ≈2M bostadsrätter</td><td>HD01CU28 betänkande</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>Register includes property, owner, association, and pledge data</td><td>HD01CU28 summary</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>Register operator Lantmäteriet</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Operational</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>Register effective Jan 1 2027</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Timeline</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>Personnummer / samordningsnummer required for lagfart</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (AML)</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>Organisationsnummer required for legal entities</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>6-month folkbokföring requirement for ombildning majority count</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (loophole)</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>CU27 effective July 1 2026</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Timeline</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>Banking sector multi-year advocacy for register</td><td>Sector public statements 2015–2024</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Support</td></tr><tr><td>E10</td><td>EU AMLD6 alignment</td><td>Policy context</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">EU compliance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch">8. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch">8. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4742,7 +4742,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch">8. Indicator Library (What to Watc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I1</td><td>CU27 kammarvote</td><td>Committee → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I2</td><td>CU28 kammarvote</td><td>Committee → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I3</td><td>Lantmäteriet register IT procurement announcement</td><td>Upphandling</td><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td align="center">Q3–Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I4</td><td>Hyresgästföreningen first documented CU27 effect case</td><td>Public statement</td><td>HGF</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I5</td><td>First AML prosecution citing CU27</td><td>Prosecution announcement</td><td>Åklagarmyndigheten</td><td align="center">H2 2026+</td></tr><tr><td>I6</td><td>Register cyber-incident (R9/T9 realisation)</td><td>SÄPO / MSB bulletin</td><td>—</td><td align="center">Post Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td>I7</td><td>Opposition reframing ("surveillance creep")</td><td>Political statements</td><td>V, MP, civil-liberties NGOs</td><td align="center">Campaign 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment">9. Implementation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment">9. Implementation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4786,7 +4786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment">9. Implementation Risk Assessment<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Mitigation Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lantmäteriet IT delivery delay</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td>Lantmäteriet, Finansdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td>Register data-security incident</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">8</td><td>Lantmäteriet, MSB</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative burden on Bostadsrättsföreningar</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Boverket, consumer guidance</td></tr><tr><td>Privacy / surveillance-creep narrative success</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Government communications</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>(Cross-ref: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R9 · R11)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Policy lineage</strong>: Gäng-agenda (Prop 2025/26:100) · HD03246 (juvenile-crime, covered in realtime-0029 earlier today) · EU AMLD6</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal context</strong>: Spring budget 2026 (HD0399)</li>
@@ -4796,7 +4796,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Depth</strong>: L2 Strategic · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32-ku33">HD01KU32-KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32-ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4836,13 +4836,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32-ku33">HD01KU32-KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Betänkande 2025/26:KU32 — <em>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — <em>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading</strong></td><td><strong>First reading (vilande)</strong> under 8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Effective (if adopted)</strong></td><td>Proposed 2027-01-01, conditional on second reading in post-2026-election Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>7/10 each · <strong>DIW Weighted</strong>: 9.8 (KU33) / 8.25 (KU32)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> (KU33) · 📜 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> (KU32)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story">1. Political Significance — Why These Are the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story">1. Political Significance — Why These Are the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's <strong>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF)</strong> is the world's <strong>oldest freedom-of-the-press law</strong> (1766 — ten years before the United States Declaration of Independence, two decades before the U.S. First Amendment, and 83 years before France's 1849 press law). It is a <strong>grundlag</strong> — one of four constitutional laws of the realm. The <strong>Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL, 1991)</strong> extends equivalent protections to modern broadcast and digital media.</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Two-reading requirement (8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen)</strong>: A grundlag amendment requires <strong>two identical votes by two separately-elected Riksdags</strong>, with at least one <strong>general election</strong> between them. The first reading (today) is called the <em>vilande beslut</em> — it "rests" until the post-election Riksdag either ratifies or rejects.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This mechanism is a deliberate constitutional brake: it forces every grundlag amendment to survive a democratic mandate change. The <strong>2026 election campaign will therefore be partly a referendum on KU32 and KU33.</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation">HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility (EU EAA grundlag accommodation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation">HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility (EU EAA grundlag accommodation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mechanism</strong>: Amends TF and YGL to permit tillgänglighetskrav (accessibility requirements) to be imposed via <strong>ordinary law</strong> on products/services that fall within the grundlag-protected sphere.</li>
 <li><strong>Three operative elements</strong>:
@@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation">HD01KU32
 <li><strong>EU driver</strong>: <strong>European Accessibility Act (Directive 2019/882)</strong> — full application since June 2025</li>
 <li><strong>Beneficiary scale</strong>: ~1.5 million Swedes with disabilities (Myndigheten för delaktighet baseline)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing">HD01KU33 — Search/Seizure Digital Evidence (TF transparency narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing">HD01KU33 — Search/Seizure Digital Evidence (TF transparency narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mechanism</strong>: Amends TF so that <strong>digital recordings seized, copied, or taken over during husrannsakan</strong> (criminal search) are <strong>no longer "allmän handling"</strong> — i.e., fall outside offentlighetsprincipen.</li>
 <li><strong>Exception</strong>: If seized material is <strong>formally incorporated as evidence</strong> (<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>) in the investigation, it <strong>retains "allmän handling"</strong> status.</li>
@@ -4863,7 +4863,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing">H
 <li><strong>Constitutional significance</strong>: This is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF's offentlighetsprincip</strong> in the digital-evidence domain in years. Although scoped to a specific context (seized digital material), it modifies a text dating to <strong>1766</strong>.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid">2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid">2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A["📅 2026-04-17&#x3C;br/>KU Committee Report&#x3C;br/>(Betänkande 2025/26:KU32/KU33)"] --> B{"Kammarvote&#x3C;br/>(vilande beslut)&#x3C;br/>May-June 2026"}
     B -->|"Passes"| C["🗳️ September 2026&#x3C;br/>General Election&#x3C;br/>(Constitutional brake)"]
@@ -4884,7 +4884,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid">2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermai
     style I fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style J fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments">3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments">3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4922,7 +4922,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments">3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD01KU32 (Accessibility)</th><th>HD01KU33 (Search/Seizure)</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong></td><td>Discharges binding EU obligation (EAA 2019/882); unifies coalition; disability-rights delivery</td><td>Solves real investigative-integrity problem in gäng-era prosecutions; narrow carve-out preserves transparency when material becomes evidence</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong></td><td>Establishes precedent that EU obligations can expand ordinary-law intrusion into grundlag sphere</td><td>Interpretive boundary of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" underspecified; narrow future interpretation could systemically shield police operations from offentlighetsprincipen</td><td align="center">HIGH / MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong></td><td>Modernises grundlag for digital accessibility without triggering broader overhaul; Nordic benchmark leadership</td><td>Strengthens investigative output → gäng-agenda policy coherence; paired with CU27/CU28 AML architecture</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong></td><td>Precedent risk: future legislation cites KU32's EU-obligation template to narrow TF/YGL in other digital domains (platform regulation, AI content, national security)</td><td>Campaign weaponisation (V/MP, press-freedom NGOs, possibly S); source-chilling effect on investigative journalism; RSF/Freedom House index downgrade</td><td align="center">MEDIUM / HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier">4. "Formellt tillförd bevisning" — The Critical Interpretive Frontier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier">4. "Formellt tillförd bevisning" — The Critical Interpretive Frontier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier"></a></h3>
 <p>The <strong>single most important question</strong> in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions will interpret <em>"formellt tillförd bevisning"</em> ("formally incorporated as evidence"). Three interpretive postures are plausible:</p>
 
 
@@ -4956,7 +4956,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier">4
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Posture</th><th>Description</th><th>Effect</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strict</strong> (press-friendly)</td><td>Material considered "incorporated" once referred to in any protokoll/stämningsansökan/tjänsteanteckning</td><td>Narrow carve-out; most material retains allmän handling status relatively quickly</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Intermediate</strong></td><td>Material incorporated upon formal inclusion in förundersökningsprotokoll</td><td>Substantial volume excluded during multi-year investigations</td><td align="center">HIGH (default)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Narrow</strong> (police-friendly)</td><td>Material incorporated only upon inclusion in stämningsansökan or as bevis i rättegång</td><td>Large volumes of seized digital material permanently outside offentlighetsprincipen</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Recommendation (for press-freedom advocates)</strong>: Focus remissvar and Lagrådet engagement on <strong>locking a strict or intermediate interpretation into legislative history</strong>. This is the leverage point that transforms KU33 from "press-freedom regression" to "narrow, proportionate reform."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors">5. Stakeholder Perspectives (Named Actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors">5. Stakeholder Perspectives (Named Actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5042,7 +5042,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors">5. Stakeholder Perspectives
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">HD01KU32</th><th align="center">HD01KU33</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>KU (proposing)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td>Committee record</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gov ministers</strong> — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice)</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Strongly supports</strong> (prosecution rationale)</td><td>Ministerial portfolio</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🟡 Watches press-freedom impact</td><td>L liberal-identity risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> — Nooshi Dadgostar (party leader)</td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🔴 Opposes (expected)</td><td>V press-freedom doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> — Daniel Helldén (språkrör)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly supports</td><td align="center">🔴 Opposes (expected)</td><td>Grundlag-protection doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong> — Magdalena Andersson (party leader)</td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🟡 <strong>Divided</strong> — position critical</td><td>S press-freedom historical vs law-and-order wing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Journalistförbundet (SJF)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Strong concern</strong></td><td>Professional press-freedom mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TU / Utgivarna</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Strong concern</strong></td><td>Publisher mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polismyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Strongly supports</strong></td><td>Operational beneficiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Åklagarmyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly supports</td><td>Prosecution effectiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DHR / FUB / SRF</strong> (disability NGOs)</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Enthusiastically supports</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td>KU32 accessibility gain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td align="center">Pending</td><td align="center">Pending</td><td>Yttrande expected Q2 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels">6. Evidence Table (with Confidence Labels)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels">6. Evidence Table (with Confidence Labels)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5120,7 +5120,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels">6. Evidence Table (with Conf
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>KU proposes first reading (vilande) of two grundlag amendments</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33 betänkanden</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>TF / YGL changes require two votes across a general election</td><td>8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Context</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>KU33 removes allmän handling status from digital material seized at husrannsakan</td><td>HD01KU33 summary text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (press freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>KU33 preserves allmän handling status when material is formellt tillförd bevisning</td><td>HD01KU33 summary text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (mitigation)</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>KU32 enables accessibility requirements via ordinary law on e-books, e-handel, broadcasters</td><td>HD01KU32 summary text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>EAA 2019/882 is the EU obligation driver for KU32</td><td>HD01KU32 rationale; EAA text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>Proposed entry-into-force 2027-01-01 conditional on post-2026-election ratification</td><td>Both betänkanden</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Timeline</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>Sweden's TF dates to 1766 — world's oldest press-freedom law</td><td>TF archival record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Framing</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande pending</td><td>Lagrådet process</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Risk signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates">7. Forward Indicators (With Triggers and Dates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates">7. Forward Indicators (With Triggers and Dates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5191,7 +5191,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates">7. Forward Indicators (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande</strong> published</td><td>Formal delivery</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>Kammarvote (vilande beslut)</td><td>KU → kammaren schedule</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">May-June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>Press-freedom NGO joint statement</td><td>Remissvar or public statement</td><td>SJF, TU, Utgivarna, PK</td><td align="center">Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>F4</td><td>S leadership definitive position on KU33</td><td>Andersson speech / partistämma</td><td>S</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>2026 valrörelse press-freedom salience</td><td>Media coverage tracking</td><td>—</td><td align="center">Aug-Sep 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td><strong>Post-election Riksdag composition</strong> — KU33 2nd-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten preliminary</td><td>Voters</td><td align="center">2026-09-13</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>Second reading in new Riksdag</td><td>Kammarvote</td><td>Next Riksdag</td><td align="center">Oct-Dec 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td>Entry into force (or rejection)</td><td>Kungörelse</td><td>Gov + Riksdag</td><td align="center">2027-01-01</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-cross-references">8. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-cross-references">8. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Grundlag text</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/tryckfrihetsforordning-19491105_sfs-1949-105">Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF, 1766)</a> · <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/yttrandefrihetsgrundlag-19911469_sfs-1991-1469">Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL, 1991)</a> · 8 kap. 14 § <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/kungorelse-1974152-om-beslutad-ny-regeringsform_sfs-1974-152">Regeringsformen</a></li>
 <li><strong>EU driver</strong>: Directive 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act)</li>
@@ -5200,7 +5200,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-cross-references">8. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Methodologies</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md">political-swot-framework</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md">political-risk-methodology</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md">political-threat-framework</a></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes">9. International Comparison — Digital-Evidence Transparency Regimes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes">9. International Comparison — Digital-Evidence Transparency Regimes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5278,7 +5278,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes">9.
 </blockquote>
 <p>(Full comparative analysis: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>../comparative-international.md</code></a> §Section 1)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree">10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branching Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree">10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branching Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     LP["🟡 Lagrådet pending Q2 2026"]
     LP --> LS{"Yttrande content"}
@@ -5300,7 +5300,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree">10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branchin
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Analysis Level</strong>: L3 (Intelligence) · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5352,9 +5352,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok ID</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td><em>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Department</strong></td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Responsible Minister</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) — Foreign Minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Countersigned by</strong></td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9/10</strong> · <strong>DIW ×0.95 = 8.55</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in this run</strong></td><td>🌍 Prominent Secondary (Co-prominent with HD03232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>🟠 <strong>L2+ Strategic</strong> (upgraded from L2 in reference-grade iteration)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment">1. Political Significance — Why This Is a Generational Norm-Entrepreneurship Moment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment">1. Political Significance — Why This Is a Generational Norm-Entrepreneurship Moment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden formally proposes to become a <strong>founding member</strong> of the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> — the <strong>first criminal tribunal established since the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals (1945–1948) to prosecute the crime of aggression specifically</strong>. The tribunal will sit in <strong>The Hague</strong>, operate under the <strong>Council of Europe framework</strong> via an Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA), and have jurisdiction to prosecute the Russian political and military leadership responsible for the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-developments-since-invasion">Key developments since invasion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-developments-since-invasion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-developments-since-invasion">Key developments since invasion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-developments-since-invasion"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5406,21 +5406,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-developments-since-invasion">Key developments since invasion<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feb 24 2022</strong></td><td>Russia launches full-scale invasion</td><td>Trigger event</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nov 2022</strong></td><td>UNGA Resolution (A/RES/ES-11/5) on reparations and accountability</td><td>Foundation for HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Feb 2022 onward</strong></td><td>Sweden joins core working group on aggression tribunal</td><td>Foundational role</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dec 16 2025</strong></td><td>Hague Convention signed in The Hague with President Zelensky present</td><td>Treaty text finalised</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mar 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden among first states to sign letter of intent</td><td>Founding-member status locked</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Apr 16 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden tables HD03231 + HD03232 in Riksdag</td><td><strong>This document</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2–Q3 2026 (projected)</strong></td><td>Swedish kammarvote on both propositions</td><td>Constitutional authorisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026 or later</strong></td><td>Tribunal operations commence; first docket opens</td><td>Accountability delivery</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's verbatim statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's verbatim statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"Ryssland måste ställas till svars för sitt aggressionsbrott mot Ukraina. Annars riskerar vi en värld där anfallskrig lönar sig. Sverige tar nu nästa steg för att ansluta sig till en särskild tribunal för att åtala och döma ryska politiska och militära ledare för aggressionsbrottet, något som inte skett sedan Nürnbergrättegångarna."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p><strong>Analyst note</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>Nuremberg framing</strong> is politically deliberate — it unifies cross-party support (M, KD, L, C, SD, S, V, MP historically all aligned with anti-aggression posture), pre-empts SD-populist ambivalence (Nuremberg is rhetorically compatible with law-and-order conservatism), and positions Sweden as <strong>norm entrepreneur rather than security-dependent free-rider</strong>. This is Sweden's largest international-legal commitment since NATO accession (March 2024).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Ratification requires Riksdag approval under RF 10 kap. (treaty accession)</li>
 <li>EPA structure means Sweden contributes assessed dues under Council of Europe framework — no novel domestic-law needed</li>
 <li>Tribunal jurisdiction covers <strong>crime of aggression</strong> as defined in ICC Rome Statute Art. 8 <em>bis</em> (2017 Kampala amendments) — filling the gap where ICC's aggression jurisdiction excludes UNSC permanent-member nationals in most circumstances</li>
 <li><strong>Sitting-HoS immunity</strong> remains a frontier legal question — the SCSL precedent (Charles Taylor) and Rome Statute Art. 27 support piercing, but ICJ <em>Arrest Warrant</em> (2002, DRC v Belgium) established general HoS immunity under customary international law</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coalition position (M/KD/L + SD parliamentary support)</strong>: Strongly supportive</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition (S/V/MP)</strong>: S and MP strongly supportive; V historically sceptical of NATO framing but consistently pro-accountability since 2022</li>
@@ -5428,27 +5428,27 @@ <h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <co
 <li><strong>Centre (C)</strong>: Strongly supportive (European international-law tradition)</li>
 <li><strong>Projected cross-party consensus</strong>: ≈ <strong>349 MPs</strong> — near-universal</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's <strong>post-NATO (Mar 2024) norm-entrepreneurship credentials</strong> reinforced — this is the first major multilateral-law commitment since accession</li>
 <li>Complements the ICC: ICC covers war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide; Special Tribunal fills the <strong>aggression-crime gap</strong> unprosecutable under current ICC rules (Kampala limitations)</li>
 <li>Message to non-European aggressors (PRC strategic observers): aggression now has a dedicated accountability track even when UNSC is deadlocked</li>
 <li>Signals to Russia: <strong>no reset pathway</strong> — Swedish commitment is institutional, not policy-cyclical</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Direct precedent: <strong>Nuremberg IMT (1945–46)</strong> — 12 death sentences, 3 life sentences, 4 acquittals</li>
 <li>Closer structural model: <strong>Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL, 2002–13)</strong> — hybrid Council-of-Europe / state-accession design; convicted sitting-era HoS (Charles Taylor)</li>
 <li>Parallel structural model: <strong>Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL, 2009–23)</strong> — Council-of-Europe-adjacent framework</li>
 <li>The tribunal represents a <strong>major evolution in international criminal law since the Rome Statute (1998)</strong> — institutionalising aggression-crime accountability outside UNSC veto politics</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[MEDIUM]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[MEDIUM]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's <strong>direct fiscal contribution</strong>: EPA assessed dues (estimate: SEK 30–80 M annually based on Council-of-Europe EPA patterns) — modest</li>
 <li><strong>Indirect fiscal exposure</strong>: Zero — reparations architecture (HD03232) funded from Russian immobilised assets, not Swedish treasury</li>
 <li><strong>Asymmetric cost-benefit</strong>: Low direct cost, high signalling value; enhanced reconstruction-contract positioning for Swedish firms (Saab, Volvo, Assa Abloy, Ericsson)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Diplomatic</strong>: Russia has condemned all accountability mechanisms; additional rhetorical/diplomatic hostility expected</li>
 <li><strong>Hybrid-warfare</strong>: See <code>threat-analysis.md</code> T6 — MEDIUM-HIGH likelihood, HIGH impact</li>
@@ -5457,7 +5457,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code>
 <li><strong>Reputational</strong>: Low downside, high upside</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["SWOT — HD03231 Ukraine Aggression Tribunal"]
         direction TB
@@ -5508,7 +5508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Me
     style T2 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5546,7 +5546,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interaction</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1 × T1</strong></td><td>Founding-member status elevates hybrid-targeting probability</td><td>SÄPO / MSB heightened readiness during operational phase</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3 × W1</strong></td><td>NATO alignment partially compensates for non-member cooperation gap via allied intelligence-sharing</td><td>Sweden → Council of Europe tribunal liaison via NATO channels</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4 × W3</strong></td><td>Nuremberg rhetoric harder to counter legally than jurisdictional technicalities</td><td>Opposition argumentation forced onto weaker ground</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O2 × T2</strong></td><td>Multilateral leadership posture hedges against US volatility</td><td>EU coalition-building is primary mitigator</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5680,7 +5680,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">4. Stakeholder Positions — N
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Evidence / Rationale</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Countersigned HD03231 / HD03232; political owner</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Tribunal architect; Nuremberg-framing author</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Legal-framework support role</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Liberal internationalism</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch (KD, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Coalition party-leader</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>S led 2022 Ukraine response</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Accountability support with NATO-framing caution</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP, språkrör)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>International-law alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>SD has consistently supported Ukraine since 2022</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok (C, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Liberal European internationalism</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky (Ukraine)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Central proponent; Hague Convention co-signatory</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF MFA)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 −5</td><td>Designated SE "unfriendly" 2022; hostile posture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Framework body</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU External Action Service</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Foreign-policy alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration (2026)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +0 to +2</td><td>Historical ICC reluctance; tribunal-specific position ambiguous</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICC</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Complementary relationship — fills aggression gap</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Amnesty International (Sweden)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Accountability priority</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Rights Defenders (Stockholm)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>War-crimes accountability focus</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral ops</td><td>Threat-response mandate</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish defence industry (Saab, BAE Bofors, Volvo)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Reconstruction positioning benefit</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-evidence-table">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5765,7 +5765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>Sweden becomes founding member of Special Tribunal</td><td>HD03231 proposition text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>Tribunal seated at The Hague</td><td>HD03231 + Stenergard press release</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>Sweden signed letter of intent March 2026</td><td>Press release (Stenergard)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Context</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>First aggression tribunal since Nuremberg (1945–46)</td><td>FM Stenergard verbatim; ICC jurisdictional history</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (framing)</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>Hague Convention adopted Dec 16 2025 with Zelensky</td><td>UD press release; diplomatic record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>Sweden part of core working group since Feb 2022</td><td>Press release timeline</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Context</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>Tribunal operates under Council of Europe EPA framework</td><td>HD03231 structural design</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Institutional</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>Russia has rejected all accountability mechanisms to date</td><td>Public record since 2022</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Prediction anchor</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>US tribunal-specific position not yet publicly committed</td><td>Open-source analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">Risk signal</td></tr><tr><td>E10</td><td>Swedish direct fiscal contribution limited to CoE EPA dues</td><td>HD03231 financial annex (not yet public in summary)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">Fiscal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation">6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation">6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5808,7 +5808,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation">6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>STRIDE</th><th align="center">Applies to HD03231?</th><th>Evidence / Translation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Russian disinfo impersonating tribunal communications; Swedish diplomatic-channel phishing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td align="center">Partial</td><td>Legal-interpretation tampering by hostile fora; narrative tampering via propaganda</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Russia will repudiate jurisdiction; some Global South states may follow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I</strong>nformation Disclosure</td><td align="center">Limited</td><td>Leaks of tribunal working-group documents (unlikely, but not zero)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Cyber ops against tribunal infrastructure at The Hague; Swedish embassy/UD DoS</td></tr><tr><td><strong>E</strong>levation of Privilege</td><td align="center">No</td><td>Tribunal design constrains expansionary claims</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5879,7 +5879,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch">7. Indicator Library (What to Watc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I1</td><td><strong>Riksdag kammarvote on HD03231</strong></td><td>UU referral → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Late May / June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I2</td><td><strong>US administration tribunal statement</strong></td><td>White House / State Dept</td><td>US Gov</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I3</td><td>Council of Europe first founder list published</td><td>EPA instrument ratification count</td><td>Council of Europe</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I4</td><td>First tribunal docket opens</td><td>Tribunal registrar</td><td>Tribunal</td><td align="center">H2 2026 or later</td></tr><tr><td>I5</td><td>Russian rhetorical / diplomatic escalation</td><td>MFA spokesperson statements</td><td>RF</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>I6</td><td>Hybrid-warfare event targeting Sweden</td><td>SÄPO / MSB bulletins</td><td>SÄPO, MSB</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened)</td></tr><tr><td>I7</td><td>EU allied state co-accession pace</td><td>Instrument deposits</td><td>EU MS</td><td align="center">Q2–Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I8</td><td>Global South reception (India, Brazil, South Africa)</td><td>Diplomatic statements</td><td>Those states</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon">8. Forward Scenarios (Short + Medium Horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon">8. Forward Scenarios (Short + Medium Horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5917,7 +5917,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon">8. Forward Scenarios (Shor
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">P</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Consequence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Riksdag ratification + broad European support</strong></td><td align="center">0.65</td><td>I1 passes; I3 shows 25+ founders</td><td>Tribunal operational by H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag ratification + limited European depth</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>I3 shows &#x3C; 15 founders</td><td>Operational but legitimacy-constrained</td></tr><tr><td>Delay / procedural hurdles</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td>Committee amendments</td><td>Entry-into-force 2027+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Major US defection</strong></td><td align="center">0.05</td><td>I2 hostile; asset-policy reversal</td><td>Reparations architecture weakened</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-cross-references">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-cross-references">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Companion</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>HD03232-analysis.md</code></a> — International Compensation Commission</li>
 <li><strong>Precedents</strong>: Nuremberg IMT (1945–46); SCSL (Sierra Leone, 2002–13); STL (Lebanon, 2009–23)</li>
@@ -5929,7 +5929,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-cross-references">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Depth</strong>: L2+ Strategic · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03232">HD03232<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5981,9 +5981,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03232">HD03232<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok ID</strong></td><td>HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td><em>Sveriges tillträde till konventionen om inrättande av en internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Department</strong></td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Responsible Minister</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) — Foreign Minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Countersigned by</strong></td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8/10</strong> · <strong>DIW ×0.95 = 7.60</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in this run</strong></td><td>🤝 Prominent Secondary (Co-prominent with HD03231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>🟠 <strong>L2+ Strategic</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii">1. Political Significance — Reparations Architecture for the Largest Inter-State Compensation Claim Since WWII<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii">1. Political Significance — Reparations Architecture for the Largest Inter-State Compensation Claim Since WWII<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an <strong>International Compensation Commission for Ukraine</strong> (the "Hague Compensation Commission" / ICCU). The commission is the institutional mechanism through which <strong>Russia can be held financially liable for the full-scale damages caused by its illegal invasion</strong>. It is the <strong>companion instrument</strong> to HD03231 (Special Tribunal) — together they constitute the Ukraine accountability architecture: <strong>criminal accountability of individuals</strong> (tribunal) + <strong>financial accountability of the state</strong> (commission).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-origins-and-foundation">Origins and foundation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-origins-and-foundation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-origins-and-foundation">Origins and foundation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-origins-and-foundation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6035,14 +6035,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-origins-and-foundation">Origins and foundation<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feb 24 2022</strong></td><td>Russia launches full-scale invasion</td><td>Damages begin accumulating</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nov 14 2022</strong></td><td>UNGA Resolution A/RES/ES-11/5 on reparations</td><td>Political foundation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May 2023</strong></td><td>Council of Europe Register of Damage established in The Hague</td><td>Claims-registration pre-commission</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2024</strong></td><td>World Bank RDNA3 estimates USD 486B+ damages (continues to grow)</td><td>Scale anchor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jan 2025</strong></td><td>G7 Ukraine Loan mechanism launches (profits from immobilised Russian assets)</td><td>Precursor asset-use architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dec 16 2025</strong></td><td>Hague Convention adopted at diplomatic conference (Zelensky present)</td><td>Treaty finalised</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Apr 16 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden tables HD03232</td><td><strong>This document</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026 – H1 2027</strong></td><td>Projected commission operational start</td><td>Claims-adjudication phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"Genom skadeståndskommissionen kan Ryssland hållas ansvarigt för de skador som dess folkrättsvidriga handlingar har orsakat. Det ukrainska folket måste få upprättelse."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p><strong>Analyst note</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>"upprättelse" (vindication/restoration)</strong> framing is doctrinally important — it positions the commission within the <strong>ius cogens reparations doctrine</strong> (state responsibility for internationally wrongful acts) rather than as mere transactional transfer. This distinguishes ICCU from G7-profit distribution and grounds it in customary international law.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Riksdag approval required for treaty accession (RF 10 kap.)</li>
 <li>ICCU is a <strong>treaty-based international organisation</strong> with claims-registration → adjudication → awards → enforcement pipeline</li>
@@ -6055,7 +6055,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens
 </li>
 <li>Sweden's accession locks in Swedish <strong>voice in enforcement-mechanism selection</strong></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Consensus issue</strong>: Same near-universal support as HD03231 (≈349 MPs projected)</li>
 <li><strong>Populist-positive framing</strong>: "Russia pays, not Swedish taxpayers" — aligns with SD, C, M, KD messaging</li>
@@ -6063,7 +6063,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <
 <li><strong>Rare cross-ideological policy</strong>: Both left and right can champion without compromise</li>
 <li>Expected Riksdag vote: late spring / early summer 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Reparations mechanism designed to <strong>complement</strong> the tribunal (criminal accountability) with <strong>structural financial accountability</strong></li>
 <li><strong>Immobilised Russian sovereign assets (≈ EUR 260B)</strong>: The primary source contemplated. Distribution:
@@ -6076,7 +6076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Le
 <li>G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025) uses <strong>profits</strong> from immobilised assets — this is the first institutional use; HD03232 potentially extends to principal use</li>
 <li>Sweden's membership strengthens its voice in how the mechanism handles asset-use decisions — particularly <strong>EU-internal cleavage</strong> between asset-seizure hawks (Poland, Baltic states, Finland) and state-immunity cautious (Germany, France, Belgium)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Most direct precedent: UN Compensation Commission (UNCC) for Iraq/Kuwait, 1991–2022</strong>
 <ul>
@@ -6090,7 +6090,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens
 <li><strong>Iran–US Claims Tribunal (1981–)</strong>: Algiers Accords model; still active after 40+ years</li>
 <li>Ukraine damages (USD 486B+ World Bank 2024) are ≈ 10× the Iraq–Kuwait figure — <strong>unprecedented scale</strong></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Sweden's own contribution to ICCU</strong>: Administrative costs only (modest — SEK 10–40M annually estimate based on analogous UN/CoE administrative commissions)</li>
 <li><strong>Reparations fund source</strong>: Russian state (immobilised assets + future Russian obligations) — <strong>not Swedish taxpayers</strong></li>
@@ -6098,7 +6098,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[HIGH
 <li><strong>Swedish indirect upside</strong>: Reconstruction-contract positioning for Swedish firms (Skanska, NCC, Peab, ABB Sweden, Ericsson, Volvo Construction Equipment) — early-accession status strengthens lobbying position</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal risk</strong>: Zero direct exposure; indirect exposure only if Sweden later contributes to bridging financing (political choice)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Legal</strong>: Russia will refuse participation; enforcement depends on asset-repurposing coalition sustainability</li>
 <li><strong>Diplomatic</strong>: Russian retaliation parallel to HD03231</li>
@@ -6108,7 +6108,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</cod
 <li><strong>Coalition</strong>: G7 disagreements on asset-use could undermine funding</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["SWOT — HD03232 International Compensation Commission"]
         direction TB
@@ -6159,7 +6159,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded
     style T2 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights-1">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights-1">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6197,7 +6197,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights-1">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interaction</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S3 × T4</strong></td><td>Zero-taxpayer framing inoculates against Swedish reparations-fatigue</td><td>Narrative discipline: keep "Russia pays" in public messaging</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4 × O2</strong></td><td>Unprecedented-scale claims → unprecedented-scale reconstruction contracts</td><td>Industrial strategy opportunity — Swedish firms should prepare</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W1 × T2</strong></td><td>Compound coalition-fragility risk</td><td>Nordic + EU + UK axis critical as US hedge</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S1 × O3</strong></td><td>Founding membership locks in decision-making voice through decadal timeline</td><td>Institutional persistence pays off across political cycles</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6331,7 +6331,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1">4. Stakeholder Positions —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Evidence / Rationale</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Countersigned HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Champion; signed Dec 2025 Hague Convention</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance Minister)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Fiscal framing support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Liberal internationalism</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch (KD, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Coalition support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Former PM; led 2022 Ukraine response</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>"Russia pays" framing aligns with SD messaging</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Accountability support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>International-law focus</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky (Ukraine)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Central proponent</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>G7 finance ministers</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4 to +5</td><td>G7 Ukraine Loan precedent; varied on principal-use</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>European Commission (von der Leyen)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Continued asset-immobilisation advocacy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Belgian government (Euroclear host)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +1 to +3</td><td>Legal-exposure concerns on principal-use</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>German Finance Ministry</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +2</td><td>State-immunity caution</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US Treasury</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +0 to +3</td><td>Position-dependent on 2026+ administration</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF MFA)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 −5</td><td>Calls mechanism "illegal"</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UN Secretary-General</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>UNGA resolution author</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>World Bank</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>RDNA3 damages-estimate provider</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICRC (Geneva)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +2</td><td>Victim-focus alignment; cautious on political frames</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish construction / reconstruction firms</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Long-horizon contract opportunity</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table-1">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-evidence-table-1">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6416,7 +6416,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table-1">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>Hague Convention adopted Dec 16 2025 with Zelensky present</td><td>UD press release; diplomatic record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>UNGA Resolution Nov 2022 establishes political basis</td><td>A/RES/ES-11/5</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Institutional</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>Sweden signed at Dec 16 2025 conference (founding signatory)</td><td>UD; HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>Total Ukraine damages USD 486B+</td><td>World Bank RDNA3 (2024); continues rising</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Scale anchor</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>Immobilised Russian sovereign assets ≈ EUR 260B</td><td>EU + G7 reports</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Funding source</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>EUR 191B concentrated at Euroclear Belgium</td><td>Euroclear disclosures</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Operational</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025) uses profits, not principal</td><td>G7 communiqué Jan 2025</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Precedent</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>UNCC precedent: USD 52.4B over 31 years</td><td>UN records</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Benchmark</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>HD03232 is companion to HD03231 (criminal + civil accountability)</td><td>HD03231 / HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Architecture</td></tr><tr><td>E10</td><td>Sweden's direct fiscal contribution limited to administrative costs</td><td>HD03232 (inferred; full financial annex pending)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">Fiscal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios">6. Bayesian Path Analysis (Conditional Scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios">6. Bayesian Path Analysis (Conditional Scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 2026-04-16&#x3C;br/>HD03232 tabled"]
     RV{"Riksdag vote&#x3C;br/>late spring 2026"}
@@ -6437,7 +6437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios">6. Bayesian Path Anal
     style PRIN fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style COLL fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6508,7 +6508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1">7. Indicator Library (What to Wa
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I1</td><td><strong>Riksdag kammarvote on HD03232</strong></td><td>UU referral → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Late May / June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I2</td><td>G7 finance-ministers statement on asset-use architecture</td><td>G7 communiqué</td><td>G7 FMs</td><td align="center">Next summit</td></tr><tr><td>I3</td><td>Belgian parliament asset-principal legislation</td><td>Legislative action</td><td>Belgian parliament</td><td align="center">Q3–Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I4</td><td>First ICCU claim adjudicated</td><td>Commission registrar</td><td>ICCU</td><td align="center">H2 2026 / 2027</td></tr><tr><td>I5</td><td>US Treasury asset-policy statement</td><td>Public guidance</td><td>US Gov</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>I6</td><td>Russian diplomatic response (note verbale)</td><td>MFA</td><td>RF</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>I7</td><td>Ukrainian war-damage baseline update</td><td>World Bank RDNA4</td><td>World Bank</td><td align="center">2026–2027</td></tr><tr><td>I8</td><td>EU member state ratification count</td><td>Deposits with depositary</td><td>EU MS</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-scenario-snapshot">8. Scenario Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-scenario-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-scenario-snapshot">8. Scenario Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-scenario-snapshot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6546,7 +6546,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-scenario-snapshot">8. Scenario Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">P</th><th>Key Trigger</th><th>Consequence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Profits-distribution (baseline)</strong></td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>Current G7 approach persists</td><td>Incremental payouts; decadal timeline; broad legitimacy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Principal-use breakthrough</strong></td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Belgian legislative change + G7 coordination</td><td>Faster large payouts; heightened legal contestation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition fragility</strong></td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>US policy shift 2026+</td><td>Reduced asset pool; political fragmentation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Commission stall</strong></td><td align="center">0.05</td><td>Structural dysfunction</td><td>Process-without-delivery failure mode</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-cross-references-1">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-cross-references-1">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Companion</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>HD03231-analysis.md</code></a> — Special Tribunal for Aggression</li>
 <li><strong>Precedents</strong>: UNCC (Iraq–Kuwait, 1991–2022, USD 52.4B over 31 years); Iran–US Claims Tribunal (1981–); Post-WWII German reparations tracks</li>
@@ -6558,7 +6558,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-cross-references-1">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Depth</strong>: L2+ Strategic · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6586,11 +6586,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Situate Swedish reforms within comparative democratic practice — press-freedom / digital-evidence law (KU-cluster) and aggression-accountability architecture (Ukraine cluster)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>Structured comparative-politics analysis (most-similar / most-different design)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Calibration</strong></td><td>Each comparison labelled with <code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> based on source depth</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom">🧭 Section 1 — Digital-Evidence Transparency: How Other Democracies Balance Investigative Integrity vs Press Freedom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom">🧭 Section 1 — Digital-Evidence Transparency: How Other Democracies Balance Investigative Integrity vs Press Freedom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: KU33 narrows "allmän handling" status for digital material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. How do comparable constitutional democracies reconcile press-freedom doctrine with investigative-integrity concerns over seized digital evidence?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6696,7 +6696,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Slippery-slope precedent for further TF compression</li>
 </ol>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design">Nordic Transparency Models — Most-Similar Design<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design">Nordic Transparency Models — Most-Similar Design<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6743,11 +6743,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design">Nordic Transparency
 <p><strong>Recommendation from comparative analysis</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's Lagrådet and Riksdag should <strong>benchmark "formellt tillförd bevisning" against Norway's clearer statutory triggers and Finland's "investigation concluded" standard</strong>. The comparative weakness of the current draft is lack of sunset / trigger clarity, not the carve-out itself.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 2 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Similar Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 2 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Similar Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: HD03231 (Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression) and HD03232 (International Compensation Commission). Historical and comparative benchmarks for assessing likely trajectory.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks">Historical Aggression-Tribunal Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks">Historical Aggression-Tribunal Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6810,7 +6810,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks">Historical Aggression-Trib
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tribunal</th><th>Era</th><th>Structure</th><th>Outcome</th><th>Relevance to HD03231</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Nuremberg (IMT)</strong></td><td>1945–46</td><td>4-power occupier tribunal</td><td>12 death sentences, 3 life sentences, 4 acquittals</td><td>Direct precedent; explicitly invoked by FM Stenergard</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tokyo (IMTFE)</strong></td><td>1946–48</td><td>11-nation tribunal</td><td>7 death sentences, 16 life sentences</td><td>Also aggression-crime precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICTY</strong> (Yugoslavia)</td><td>1993–2017</td><td>UNSC ad hoc</td><td>90 sentenced (Milošević died pre-verdict)</td><td>Jurisdictional innovation precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICTR</strong> (Rwanda)</td><td>1994–2015</td><td>UNSC ad hoc</td><td>62 convictions</td><td>Complete record of operations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SCSL</strong> (Sierra Leone)</td><td>2002–13</td><td>UN + Sierra Leone</td><td>Convicted Charles Taylor (sitting HoS era)</td><td>Sitting-HoS immunity piercing precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICC (Rome Statute)</strong></td><td>2002–</td><td>Treaty-based</td><td>124 states parties; aggression jurisdiction limited (Kampala amendments)</td><td>Complementary to HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>STL</strong> (Lebanon/Hariri)</td><td>2009–23</td><td>UN + Lebanon, Council of Europe-support model</td><td>Limited convictions</td><td>Structural model for HD03231</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03231-distinctive-features">HD03231 Distinctive Features<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231-distinctive-features"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03231-distinctive-features">HD03231 Distinctive Features<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231-distinctive-features"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6859,7 +6859,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03231-distinctive-features">HD03231 Distinctive Features<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD03231 (Ukraine)</th><th>Closest Precedent</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Jurisdictional base</td><td>Council of Europe + state accessions</td><td>STL (Council of Europe support)</td><td>Novel at this scale</td></tr><tr><td>Crime coverage</td><td>Aggression only (gap-filler vs ICC)</td><td>IMT Nuremberg Count Two</td><td>Narrow, focused design</td></tr><tr><td>Sitting-HoS immunity</td><td><strong>Targets Russian leadership despite</strong></td><td>ICJ <em>Arrest Warrant</em> (2002) — general immunity; SCSL Taylor carve-out</td><td><strong>Legal frontier</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Victim state involvement</td><td>Ukraine co-founder</td><td>ICTY (Bosnia), SCSL (Sierra Leone)</td><td>Consistent pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement mechanism</td><td>State-cooperation; parallel asset-immobilisation</td><td>ICC</td><td>Limited without US participation</td></tr><tr><td>Expected caseload</td><td>Highest-level Russian officials</td><td>IMT scope</td><td>Precedent-scale</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents">International Compensation Commission Precedents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents">International Compensation Commission Precedents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6919,7 +6919,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents">International Compe
 <p><strong>Key comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The UNCC (Iraq–Kuwait) is the closest modern precedent. It distributed USD 52.4 B over 31 years funded from Iraqi oil-export revenues. HD03232's architecture is <strong>structurally similar but with a larger funding source</strong> (≈ EUR 260 B immobilised Russian assets at Euroclear + other G7 venues) and a <strong>larger damage envelope</strong> (~USD 486 B World Bank 2024 estimate). The analytic prior is: <strong>decadal-timeline, partial satisfaction, political sustainability challenges</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk">🧭 Section 3 — Press-Freedom Indices — Sweden's Position and Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk">🧭 Section 3 — Press-Freedom Indices — Sweden's Position and Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6956,7 +6956,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk">🧭 Se
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Index</th><th align="center">2025 Rank</th><th>Methodology Sensitivity to KU33</th><th>Projected Direction Post-Amendment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RSF World Press Freedom Index</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>4</strong></td><td>HIGH — specifically tracks constitutional press-freedom changes</td><td>↓ 2–5 ranks plausible <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom House (Press component)</strong></td><td align="center">98/100</td><td>MEDIUM — tracks legal framework</td><td>↓ 2–4 points plausible <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V-Dem Civil Liberties</strong></td><td align="center">0.96</td><td>LOW — absorbs within broader civil-liberties score</td><td>Minor <code>[LOW]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom on the Net</strong></td><td align="center">93/100</td><td>MEDIUM — digital-freedom focus relevant to KU33</td><td>↓ 1–3 points <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context">Historical Sweden Index Movement (Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context">Historical Sweden Index Movement (Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6997,7 +6997,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context">Historical Sweden Index Mov
 <p><strong>Comparative framing</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's RSF rank is currently <strong>higher than</strong> Germany (10), UK (23), US (45), France (21) — giving room to decline somewhat without falling below comparable democracies. The <strong>reputational risk is reputational headline-grabbing more than substantive ranking collapse</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context">🧭 Section 4 — EU Accessibility Act Precedent (KU32 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context">🧭 Section 4 — EU Accessibility Act Precedent (KU32 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7050,7 +7050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context">🧭 Section
 <p><strong>Comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden is <strong>the only EU member state requiring a grundlag amendment</strong> to implement EAA. This reflects the unusual constitutional scope of TF/YGL over grundlag-protected publishing activity. The novel Swedish grundlag route is <strong>not a regulatory over-reach</strong> but a constitutional necessity. This fact rebuts some "constitutional sprawl" framings.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies">🧭 Section 5 — Opposition-Exploitation Patterns in Comparable Democracies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies">🧭 Section 5 — Opposition-Exploitation Patterns in Comparable Democracies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7097,7 +7097,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracie
 <p><strong>Comparative insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: The 2008 FRA-lagen episode is Sweden's most directly analogous prior — an intelligence/privacy constitutional reform that produced an <strong>attentive-voter mobilisation</strong> (Piratpartiet surge). KU33 carries similar risk structure but without a current single-issue vehicle for mobilisation; <strong>V/MP are the most likely beneficiaries</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders">🧭 Section 6 — Diplomatic Response Patterns to Aggression-Tribunal Founders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders">🧭 Section 6 — Diplomatic Response Patterns to Aggression-Tribunal Founders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7150,7 +7150,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-found
 <p><strong>Comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The Finnish precedent (instrumentalised migration pressure at border 2023–24) and the Baltic cable-sabotage pattern (2023–24) give the strongest priors for what Sweden faces. Riksdagsmonitor's R1 score of 16/25 is <strong>consistent with comparative observations</strong>, not alarmist.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sources">📎 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">📎 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Reporters Without Borders, <em>World Press Freedom Index 2025</em></li>
 <li>Freedom House, <em>Freedom in the World 2025</em> / <em>Freedom on the Net 2025</em></li>
@@ -7164,7 +7164,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sources">📎 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li>Various national public-records / transparency acts (Offentleglova, IFG, FOIA, Loi 1881, etc.)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> scenarios Base/Bull-Lite use Nordic-model analogy</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T6 Russian hybrid-warfare calibrated against Finland / Estonia / Lithuania precedents</li>
@@ -7174,7 +7174,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: Comparative-politics analysis v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7198,7 +7198,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-with-data-depth">🗂️ Document Classification (with Data Depth)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-with-data-depth"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-with-data-depth">🗂️ Document Classification (with Data Depth)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-with-data-depth"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7289,7 +7289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-with-data-depth">🗂️ Document Classif
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Policy Area</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Type</th><th align="center">Committee</th><th align="center">Sensitivity</th><th align="center">Scope</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Grundlag?</th><th align="center">Data Depth</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Constitutional Law / Press Freedom / Criminal Procedure</td><td align="center"><strong>P0 — Constitutional</strong></td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">KU</td><td align="center">Public-interest high</td><td align="center">National + durable</td><td align="center">Pre-election</td><td align="center"><strong>YES (TF)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>L3 Intelligence</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Constitutional Law / Media / Accessibility</td><td align="center"><strong>P0 — Constitutional</strong></td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">KU</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">National + durable</td><td align="center">Pre-election</td><td align="center"><strong>YES (TF + YGL)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>L3 Intelligence</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Foreign Policy / International Criminal Law / Ukraine</td><td align="center">P1 — Critical</td><td align="center">Proposition</td><td align="center">UU</td><td align="center">Public-interest high</td><td align="center">International</td><td align="center">H1 2026</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>Foreign Policy / Reparations / Ukraine</td><td align="center">P1 — Critical</td><td align="center">Proposition</td><td align="center">UU</td><td align="center">Public-interest high</td><td align="center">International</td><td align="center">H1 2026</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Housing Policy / Financial Markets / AML</td><td align="center">P2 — Important</td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">Sector</td><td align="center">2027</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property Law / AML / Organised Crime</td><td align="center">P2 — Important</td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">Sector</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid">Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid">Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Q1{"Does the document&#x3C;br/>amend a grundlag?"}
     Q1 -->|YES| P0["🔴 P0 — Constitutional&#x3C;br/>(KU32, KU33)"]
@@ -7307,7 +7307,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid">Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid
     style P2b fill:#FFC107,color:#000000
     style P3 fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-policy-domain-mapping">🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-policy-domain-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-mapping">🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7345,7 +7345,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-policy-domain-mapping">🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Documents</th><th align="center">Weighted Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Constitutional Law / Press Freedom / Democratic Infrastructure</strong></td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGHEST</strong> (DIW-weighted lead)</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine / Foreign Policy / International Criminal Law</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Housing / Property / AML</td><td>HD01CU28, HD01CU27</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal Justice / Organised Crime</td><td>HD01KU33 (partial), HD01CU27</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (cross-cutting)</td></tr><tr><td>Disability Rights / EU Compliance</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages">🇪🇺 EU, Council of Europe &#x26; International Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages">🇪🇺 EU, Council of Europe &#x26; International Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7389,7 +7389,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages">🇪🇺 EU, Council o
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>International Linkage</th><th>Treaty / Instrument</th><th align="center">Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>EU Accessibility Act</td><td>Directive 2019/882 (in force Jun 2025)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Venice Commission / RSF Index</td><td>Council of Europe press-freedom benchmarks</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong> (post-entry-into-force monitoring)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression</td><td>Council of Europe framework; Rome Statute aggression gap</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>International Compensation Commission</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 2025; UNGA 2022 reparations resolution</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>EU AML Directive (AMLD6)</td><td>EU AML framework</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-implications">🎯 Publication Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-implications">🎯 Publication Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7417,7 +7417,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-implications">🎯 Publication Implications<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Classification Signal</th><th>Article Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Two P0 Constitutional docs in same run</td><td>Lead MUST be constitutional</td></tr><tr><td>Two P1 Critical foreign-policy docs</td><td>MUST have prominent dedicated section</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag + historic foreign-policy in same day</td><td>Coverage-completeness mandate: no omissions</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande pending</td><td>Uncertainty signal to flag in article</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-data-depth-levels-applied">🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-data-depth-levels-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-depth-levels-applied">🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-depth-levels-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7473,7 +7473,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-data-depth-levels-applied">🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied<a cl
 <li><strong>L2 Strategic</strong>: SWOT Mermaid; named-actor table; evidence table; indicator library; implementation-risk table</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--retention--review-cadence">📅 Retention &#x26; Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--retention--review-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--review-cadence">📅 Retention &#x26; Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--review-cadence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7528,7 +7528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--retention--review-cadence">📅 Retention &#x26; Review Cadence<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Artefact</th><th>Retention</th><th align="center">Review Cadence</th><th>Trigger Events</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>All analysis files</td><td>Permanent (public archive)</td><td align="center">Quarterly (or event-driven)</td><td>See triggers below</td></tr><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">On next Lagrådet yttrande publication</td><td>Lagrådet ruling</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">Bi-weekly during legislative tempo</td><td>R1/R2/R11 indicator fires</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">Event-driven (major signals)</td><td>Any scenario indicator fires</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">Annual (RSF/FH/V-Dem cycle)</td><td>Index-publication dates</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">One-off reference artefact</td><td>Methodology change</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">On kammarvote; post-implementation</td><td>Voting + operational milestones</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis">Trigger Events Requiring Re-Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis">Trigger Events Requiring Re-Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7566,7 +7566,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis">Trigger Events Requiring Re-Ana
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Files to Re-Review</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td>Analyst on duty</td><td>risk-assessment, swot-analysis, documents/HD01KU32-KU33, synthesis-summary, executive-brief, scenarios</td></tr><tr><td>Kammarvote on KU33 (first reading)</td><td>Analyst</td><td>documents/HD01KU32-KU33, stakeholder-perspectives, synthesis-summary</td></tr><tr><td>Kammarvote on HD03231/HD03232</td><td>Analyst</td><td>documents/HD03231, documents/HD03232, threat-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare event attributable</td><td>Analyst</td><td>threat-analysis, risk-assessment</td></tr><tr><td>2026 election result</td><td>Analyst</td><td>ALL files (full re-derivation of post-election scenarios)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--access-control-impact">🔐 Access-Control Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--access-control-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-access-control-impact">🔐 Access-Control Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-control-impact"></a></h3>
 <p>Classification <strong>Public</strong> means:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All files publishable on <code>github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor</code></li>
@@ -7589,7 +7589,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--access-control-impact">🔐 Access-Control Impact<a class="" aria-hi
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7609,7 +7609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>XREF-ID</strong></td><td>XRF-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context">🕸️ Document Linkage Graph (Constitutional Lead + Ukraine Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context">🕸️ Document Linkage Graph (Constitutional Lead + Ukraine Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     %% Constitutional cluster (LEAD)
     HD01KU33["HD01KU33&#x3C;br/>Search/Seizure Digital&#x3C;br/>🏛️ LEAD"]
@@ -7691,8 +7691,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context">🕸
     style NUREMBERG fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style ELECT2026 fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--thematic-clusters">🧱 Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead">Cluster A — Constitutional Reform (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">🧱 Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead">Cluster A — Constitutional Reform (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32</strong> (this run, first reading)</li>
 <li>Constitutional mechanics: TF (1766), YGL (1991), RF 8 kap. 14 §</li>
@@ -7700,14 +7700,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead">Cluster A — Constitutional R
 <li><strong>Second reading required post-Sep-2026 election</strong> — structurally embeds KU33/KU32 in 2026 valrörelse</li>
 <li>Institutional review: Lagrådet yttrande pending</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability">Cluster B — Ukraine Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability">Cluster B — Ukraine Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03231 + HD03232</strong> (this run, propositions)</li>
 <li>Institutional pillars: Council of Europe, Nuremberg precedent, ICC gap, Hague Convention Dec 2025</li>
 <li>Financial architecture: G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025), Euroclear EUR 191B, Russian assets ~EUR 260B</li>
 <li>Security context: NATO accession (March 2024)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--property--aml">Cluster C — Property / AML<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--property--aml"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--property--aml">Cluster C — Property / AML<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--property--aml"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28 + HD01CU27</strong> (this run)</li>
 <li>Policy lineage: gäng-agenda (Prop 2025/26:100), juvenile-crime proposition (HD03246)</li>
@@ -7715,7 +7715,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-c--property--aml">Cluster C — Property / AML<a class="" ari
 <li>Fiscal context: Spring budget 2026 (HD0399)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027">⏱️ Contextual Timeline — Nuremberg → Rome → Hague → Stockholm → 2027<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027">⏱️ Contextual Timeline — Nuremberg → Rome → Hague → Stockholm → 2027<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title Accountability Architecture Timeline
     1945-1946 : Nuremberg Tribunal : First aggression prosecution
@@ -7735,7 +7735,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027">⏱
     2026 : Sep 13 Swedish general election : Constitutional brake
     2027 : Jan 1 proposed entry into force : KU amendments + CU28 register</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical">🔗 Cross-Cluster Interference (Rhetorical)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical">🔗 Cross-Cluster Interference (Rhetorical)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7758,7 +7758,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical">🔗 Cross-Cluster Interferen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tension</th><th>Description</th><th>Opposition Exploit Vector</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Constitutional × Ukraine</strong></td><td>Government championing aggression-tribunal (implicitly valorises journalists documenting Russian war crimes) while narrowing TF at home (KU33)</td><td>"Sweden defends press freedom abroad while compressing it at home" — V/MP/NGO talking point</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional × Housing</strong></td><td>AML/anti-crime rationale frames KU33 carve-out while CU27/CU28 expand registries — together suggest a coherent surveillance-adjacent trajectory</td><td>Privacy/V talking point — "mission creep"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--prior-run-forward-chain-table">🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--prior-run-forward-chain-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-run-forward-chain-table">🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-run-forward-chain-table"></a></h3>
 <p>Continuity with adjacent Riksdagsmonitor runs — so subsequent analysts can find antecedents and the causal chain:</p>
 
 
@@ -7801,7 +7801,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--prior-run-forward-chain-table">🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>This Run</th><th>Prior-Run Context</th><th>Next Expected Run Event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong> (Apr 17)</td><td>Prop 2025/26:56 (gäng-agenda policy lineage, Q4 2025)</td><td>Kammarvote first reading May–Jun 2026 (separate run)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 (Apr 17)</td><td>2022 EU Accessibility Act transposition planning (Q2 2022)</td><td>Kammarvote first reading May–Jun 2026 (separate run)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong> (Apr 16)</td><td>Ukraine core-working-group Feb 2022; Hague Convention Dec 16 2025</td><td>Kammarvote late May / Jun 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 (Apr 16)</td><td>UNGA A/RES/ES-11/5 (Nov 2022); CoE Register of Damage (May 2023); Hague Convention Dec 16 2025</td><td>Kammarvote late May / Jun 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 (Apr 17)</td><td>SOU 2023/24 on bostadsrätt register</td><td>Implementation: register setup Jan 1 2027</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27 (Apr 17)</td><td>Hyresgästföreningen loophole documentation (2015–24)</td><td>Entry into force Jul 1 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one">Continuity Contracts (How Future Runs Inherit from This One)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one">Continuity Contracts (How Future Runs Inherit from This One)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7841,7 +7841,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one">Continuit
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7872,70 +7872,70 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 <p>Every reference-grade analysis should include a self-audit. This file is the one for realtime-1434 — the <strong>first run designated as Riksdagsmonitor's gold-standard exemplar</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection">1. DIW-Weighted Lead-Story Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection">1. DIW-Weighted Lead-Story Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection"></a></h4>
 <p>The Democratic-Impact Weighting methodology correctly elevated the grundlag package over raw news-value rank. Before DIW v1.0, the lede would have been Ukraine (raw 9). With DIW, the lead is KU33 (weighted 9.8). This is the correct democratic-infrastructure call.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Mandatory DIW table in every <code>significance-scoring.md</code> (see Rule 5 in <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70">2. Coverage-Completeness Rule (Weighted ≥ 7.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70">2. Coverage-Completeness Rule (Weighted ≥ 7.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70"></a></h4>
 <p>The rule prevents silent omission of co-prominent stories. Ukraine propositions (weighted 8.55 + 7.60) must appear as dedicated H3 sections even when lead is elsewhere.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Bash enforcement gate in <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> "Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate". <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim">3. Confidence Labels on Every Analytical Claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim">3. Confidence Labels on Every Analytical Claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim"></a></h4>
 <p>Every claim in synthesis-summary, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder files carries <code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code>. This forces the analyst to distinguish observed fact from projection.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Template checklist item — any analytical sentence without a confidence label is flagged as template-filler in QA. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data">4. Color-Coded Mermaid With Real Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data">4. Color-Coded Mermaid With Real Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data"></a></h4>
 <p>Every file has ≥ 1 Mermaid diagram with colour directives and real dok_ids / actor names. Zero placeholder diagrams.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Template preamble block with Mermaid colour palette (already in <code>political-style-guide.md</code>). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference-matrix">5. TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-tows-interference-matrix">5. TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h4>
 <p>The S4 × T1 cross-SWOT interference finding (that the interpretation of "formellt tillförd bevisning" is the strategic centre of gravity) is the <strong>single most actionable insight</strong> in the dossier. It emerged from TOWS, not vanilla SWOT.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Mandatory TOWS matrix in every <code>swot-analysis.md</code> when the run has ≥ 4 entries in any SWOT quadrant. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension">6. Cross-Cluster Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension">6. Cross-Cluster Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension"></a></h4>
 <p>The "press freedom abroad vs at home" tension was identified, named, and analysed for exploitation vectors. Opposition parties will use this; the government will need a counter-narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: When a run covers ≥ 2 thematic clusters, the synthesis-summary MUST include a §Cross-Cluster Interference subsection. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride">7. Attack-Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride">7. Attack-Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride"></a></h4>
 <p>The threat-analysis file applies four complementary threat frameworks, each surfacing different dimensions (goal-decomposition, adversary-lifecycle, actor-infrastructure-capability-victim, and STRIDE classification). No single framework would have produced the full threat picture.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Threat-analysis template §3 (Frameworks) becomes a multi-framework checklist. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-bayesian-update-rules">8. Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-bayesian-update-rules">8. Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h4>
 <p>The risk-assessment file specifies <strong>observable signals</strong> (Lagrådet yttrande, S-leader statement, Nordic cable event) that trigger explicit prior/posterior risk-score updates. This makes the analysis <strong>living</strong> rather than static.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Every risk-assessment file MUST include a Bayesian-update-rules table. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking">9. International Comparative Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking">9. International Comparative Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking"></a></h4>
 <p>The comparative file situated Swedish reforms against DE, UK, US, FR, Nordic, and EU benchmarks, revealing that Nordic neighbours operate <strong>exactly the regime KU33 proposes</strong> — a finding that directly refutes the strongest version of the "press-freedom regression" framing while preserving the interpretive-frontier concern.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Runs with P0 or P1 documents MUST include a <code>comparative-international.md</code> file. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities">10. Scenario Analysis With Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities">10. Scenario Analysis With Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities"></a></h4>
 <p>Base / Bull-Lite / Bear / Mixed / Wildcard-1 / Wildcard-2 scenarios with explicit prior probabilities that sum to 1.0. Monitoring indicators flip priors. The analysis becomes <strong>actionable</strong> for editorial and policy decisions.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Runs with multiple scenarios should produce a <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>; mandatory for P0. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager">11. Executive Brief (One-Pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager">11. Executive Brief (One-Pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager"></a></h4>
 <p>The <code>executive-brief.md</code> compresses the dossier into a 3-minute read for newsroom editors / policy advisors who will not read the full 11-file set.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Every run MUST produce an <code>executive-brief.md</code>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-12-readme--reading-order">12. README / Reading Order<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-readme--reading-order"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-12-readme--reading-order">12. README / Reading Order<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-readme--reading-order"></a></h4>
 <p>Directory <code>README.md</code> provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executive / policy / intelligence / tracker / methodologist), and copy-paste-safe top-line findings. Onboarding time reduced from 30 min to 5 min.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Every run MUST produce a folder-level <code>README.md</code>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns">❌ What Failed First-Pass (Documented Anti-Patterns)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents">AP-A: Silent Omission of Weighted ≥ 7 Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns">❌ What Failed First-Pass (Documented Anti-Patterns)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents">AP-A: Silent Omission of Weighted ≥ 7 Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: First-draft English and Swedish articles <strong>entirely omitted HD03231 and HD03232</strong> despite their weighted scores being 8.55 and 7.60. The author prioritised grundlag lead but silently dropped Ukraine.</p>
 <p><strong>Root cause</strong>: No coverage-completeness check between analysis and article rendering.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed)</strong>: "Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate" in <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — bash verification step that greps article for every document with weighted ≥ 7 before commit.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> Rule 5 Anti-pattern A. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion">AP-B: News-Value vs Democratic-Impact Confusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion">AP-B: News-Value vs Democratic-Impact Confusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: Raw significance score (9 for HD03231) would have led the article — correct for news-value but wrong for democratic-infrastructure impact.</p>
 <p><strong>Root cause</strong>: No systematic weighting framework distinguishing news-value from democratic-durability.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed)</strong>: DIW v1.0 methodology with specified multipliers per document type (×1.40 for TF narrowing, ×1.25 for TF expansion, ×0.95 for foreign-policy continuity).</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> Rule 5 + <code>significance-scoring.md</code> mandatory DIW section. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters">AP-C: Shallow Per-Doc Files for Secondary Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters">AP-C: Shallow Per-Doc Files for Secondary Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: Initial per-doc files for HD03231, HD03232, CU27/CU28 were thin L1 (≈ 70–130 lines) without confidence labels, Mermaid diagrams, forward indicators, or stakeholder named actors — inconsistent with LEAD KU32/33 file (L3, 153 lines with full tradecraft).</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed in this iteration)</strong>: All per-doc files upgraded to at least L2+ quality — Mermaid, confidence labels on every claim, forward indicators with dates, named stakeholders, international comparison anchors.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: Template update — <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> gains an L1/L2/L3 depth-tier checklist; any document classified P0/P1 must be L2+ minimum. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest">AP-D: Stale Data Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest">AP-D: Stale Data Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> retained obsolete "HD03231 ✅ LEAD / HD01KU32 ✅ Secondary" labels after DIW re-ranking.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed)</strong>: Manifest refreshed to show DIW-corrected selection status.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: Template update — data manifest fields use "Selected? (post-DIW)" heading. Automated check: if significance-scoring.md disagrees with data-download-manifest.md on lead-story, block commit. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop">AP-E: Missing Self-Audit Loop<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop">AP-E: Missing Self-Audit Loop<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: Prior runs had no mechanism to capture lessons-learned and feed them upstream into the methodology guide and templates. Failures kept recurring.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (this file)</strong>: <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> becomes a <strong>template artefact</strong> for future reference-grade runs.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: Runs designated as reference exemplars MUST produce a methodology-reflection file. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommended-upstream-changes">🔧 Recommended Upstream Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommended-upstream-changes"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions">A. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Additions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-upstream-changes">🔧 Recommended Upstream Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-upstream-changes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions">A. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Additions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>§Rule 5 (DIW)</strong>: Already in place — keep, cite realtime-1434 as exemplar</li>
 <li><strong>§Rule 6 — Reference-Grade Depth Tiers</strong>: New rule specifying L1/L2/L3 content floors per document priority:
@@ -7950,7 +7950,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions">A. <code>ai-driven-analysis-
 <li><strong>§Rule 8 — International-Comparative Benchmarking</strong>: P0/P1 runs include <code>comparative-international.md</code></li>
 <li><strong>§Exemplar pointer</strong>: Cite realtime-1434 as canonical reference</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-b-templates--new-or-extended">B. Templates — New or Extended<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-templates--new-or-extended"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b-templates--new-or-extended">B. Templates — New or Extended<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-templates--new-or-extended"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -8027,14 +8027,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-b-templates--new-or-extended">B. Templates — New or Extended<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Template</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template (this file becomes reference content)</td></tr><tr><td><code>README.md</code> (folder index)</td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Add Red-Team Box, Key-Uncertainties, ACH sections</td></tr><tr><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Mandatory TOWS matrix block</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Bayesian prior/posterior table + interconnection graph + ALARP ladder</td></tr><tr><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Kill Chain + Diamond Model + MITRE-style TTP library</td></tr><tr><td><code>stakeholder-impact.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Influence-network Mermaid + fracture-probability tree</td></tr><tr><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Sensitivity analysis + alternative rankings</td></tr><tr><td><code>political-classification.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Sensitivity decision tree + data-depth levels</td></tr><tr><td><code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>L1/L2/L3 depth tiers with content floor per tier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes">C. Agentic Workflow Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes">C. Agentic Workflow Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><code>news-realtime-monitor.md</code> Step D.2: enforce Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate (already deployed)</li>
 <li><code>news-realtime-monitor.md</code> Step D.3: (new) enforce reference-grade minimum file-set for P0 runs — exec-brief, scenarios, comparative, reflection, README</li>
 <li><code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code>: Add new §"Reference-Grade File Set" verifying presence of required files per priority tier</li>
 <li>All 12 agentic workflows: replicate the gate pattern consistently</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-d-skills-updates">D. Skills Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-skills-updates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-d-skills-updates">D. Skills Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-skills-updates"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>.github/skills/intelligence-analysis-techniques/SKILL.md</code>: Add ACH, Red-Team, Kill Chain, Diamond, Bayesian, scenario-tree references with pointer to realtime-1434 as exemplar</li>
 <li><code>.github/skills/editorial-standards/SKILL.md</code>: Already has Gate 0 (Lead-Story) — extend with reference-grade depth-tier guidance</li>
@@ -8042,7 +8042,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-d-skills-updates">D. Skills Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><code>.github/skills/investigative-journalism/SKILL.md</code>: Add interpretive-frontier analytic pattern (KU33 "formellt tillförd bevisning" as worked example)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved">📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs Achieved)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved">📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs Achieved)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8128,7 +8128,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved">📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">Target</th><th align="center">Achieved</th><th align="center">Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Files produced</td><td align="center">≥ 9</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong> (+5 new reference)</td><td align="center">+7</td></tr><tr><td>Mermaid diagrams</td><td align="center">≥ 1 per file</td><td align="center">≈ 1.3 per file</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labels</td><td align="center">Every claim</td><td align="center">✓ pervasive</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>dok_id citations</td><td align="center">Every major claim</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Named actors</td><td align="center">≥ 20</td><td align="center">25+</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>International benchmarks</td><td align="center">≥ 5</td><td align="center">12 jurisdictions</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Analyst frameworks applied</td><td align="center">≥ 2</td><td align="center">7 (DIW, TOWS, Attack-Tree, Kill Chain, Diamond, STRIDE, Bayesian, ACH)</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Forward indicators w/ dates</td><td align="center">≥ 8</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Scenarios with probabilities</td><td align="center">≥ 3</td><td align="center">6 (Base, Bull-Lite, Bear, Mixed, Wildcard-1, Wildcard-2)</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster tension analysis</td><td align="center">Required if ≥ 2 clusters</td><td align="center">✓ explicit</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Red-Team / ACH critique</td><td align="center">Recommended</td><td align="center">✓ in synthesis-summary</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Self-audit</td><td align="center">Required for exemplar</td><td align="center">✓ this file</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo">🎯 Recommendation to Methodology Owner (CEO)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo">🎯 Recommendation to Methodology Owner (CEO)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Designate realtime-1434 as Riksdagsmonitor's reference exemplar</strong> for political-intelligence tradecraft. All future runs measure against it.</li>
 <li><strong>Merge this reflection's Section C upstream changes</strong> into <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 and template set.</li>
@@ -8139,7 +8139,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo">🎯 Recommendation to Meth
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Exemplar Lock-In</strong>: 2026-09-01 (CEO sign-off required)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -8170,7 +8170,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>v5.1 note</strong>: "Selected?" column reflects <strong>post-DIW</strong> publication decision. See <code>significance-scoring.md</code> for weighting rationale.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8238,7 +8238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>MCP Tool</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Count</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdag propositioner (2025/26)</td><td><code>get_propositioner</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">272 total, 6 recent</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag betänkanden (2025/26)</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">20 retrieved</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag dokument search</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (2026-04-16 → 2026-04-17)</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">2,818 total</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag voteringar (2025/26)</td><td><code>search_voteringar</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">20 retrieved (latest: March 2026)</td></tr><tr><td>Regering pressmeddelanden</td><td><code>search_regering</code> (2026-04-16 → 2026-04-17)</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">15 found</td></tr><tr><td>Regering propositioner</td><td><code>search_regering</code> propositioner</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">3 found</td></tr><tr><td>Document content</td><td><code>get_g0v_document_content</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">1 fetched (Ukraine press release)</td></tr><tr><td>Document details</td><td><code>get_dokument</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">6 fetched</td></tr><tr><td>Sync status</td><td><code>get_sync_status</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Status: live</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection">📄 Key Documents Retrieved (Post-DIW Selection)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection">📄 Key Documents Retrieved (Post-DIW Selection)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8336,7 +8336,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection">📄 Key Documents Retri
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Type</th><th align="center">Date</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th align="center">Weighted</th><th>Role</th><th align="center">Depth</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center"><strong>9.80</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong></td><td align="center">L3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td align="center">Prop</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td>🌍 Prominent</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td align="center"><strong>8.25</strong></td><td>📜 CO-LEAD</td><td align="center">L3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td align="center">Prop</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td>🤝 Prominent</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">5.80</td><td>🏠 Secondary</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td align="center">5.67</td><td>🏠 Secondary</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU22</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Context only</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-14</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Context (prev. covered)</td><td align="center">—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--excluded-documents-previously-covered">🚫 Excluded Documents (Previously Covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--excluded-documents-previously-covered"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-excluded-documents-previously-covered">🚫 Excluded Documents (Previously Covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-excluded-documents-previously-covered"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8364,7 +8364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--excluded-documents-previously-covered">🚫 Excluded Documents (Prev
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Covered in realtime-0029 (today, 00:29 UTC)</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Published Apr 13 — covered by other workflows</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Published Apr 13 — spring economic proposition</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Published Apr 13 — spring extra budget</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-freshness">🕐 Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-freshness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-freshness">🕐 Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Last riksdagen sync</strong>: 2026-04-17T14:34:37Z (live)</li>
 <li><strong>Data age at analysis start</strong>: &#x3C; 1 minute</li>
@@ -8372,7 +8372,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-freshness">🕐 Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Validity window</strong>: Until 2026-04-24 (next realtime scan) or event-driven refresh</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8421,6 +8421,27 @@ <h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custod
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Step</th><th>Tool / Responsible</th><th align="center">Timestamp (UTC)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MCP query batch</td><td>news-realtime-monitor agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:34</td></tr><tr><td>Document selection (post-DIW)</td><td>Agent + significance-scoring.md</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:36</td></tr><tr><td>Per-file analysis generation</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:38–15:10</td></tr><tr><td>Synthesis + cross-reference</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 15:12</td></tr><tr><td>Article rendering</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7 + rendering script</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 15:18</td></tr><tr><td>Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate</td><td>bash verification</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 15:20</td></tr><tr><td>Reference-grade upgrade (this version)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7 (2026-04-18 session)</td><td align="center">2026-04-18 07:30–</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -8461,7 +8482,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:00.821Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:22.469Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html b/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html
index 42f8644434..9896d27ab8 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Realtime Monitor 1434">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:01.459Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.100Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:01.459Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.100Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-17T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1434","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet advanced two grundlag amendments (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) on 2026-04-17 — the first substantive narrowing of Tryckfrihetsförordningen (1766) in the digital-evidence…","datePublished":"2026-04-17T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:01.459Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1434","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet advanced two grundlag amendments (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) on 2026-04-17 — the first substantive narrowing of Tryckfrihetsförordningen (1766) in the digital-evidence…","datePublished":"2026-04-17T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:23.100Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-17-realtime-1434-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -232,10 +232,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs / 2 weeks / post-election 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet advanced two grundlag amendments (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) on 2026-04-17 — the first substantive narrowing of <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) in the digital-evidence domain in years. Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency.</strong> On the same 24-hour window, FM Maria Malmer Stenergard and PM Ulf Kristersson tabled Sweden's accession to the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine (HD03231) and the International Compensation Commission (HD03232) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg. The cluster reveals a coordinated pre-election legislative sprint across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, housing-market integrity, and quality-of-life deregulation. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Publication Decision</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> S4 × T1</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-posture threat monitoring</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T6 · Kill Chain §3</td><td align="right">Continuous, heightened post-vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The #1 finding is the KU33 grundlag amendment.</strong> Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong>. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine tribunal and compensation commission are co-prominent.</strong> Global news-value high; no direct Swedish fiscal burden; cross-party consensus near-universal (≈ 349 MPs). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met.</strong> All six documents with weighted significance ≥ 5 are covered in the published article. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td>Government leader, Ukraine co-signatory</td><td>Political owner of both constitutional and foreign-policy packages</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td>Tribunal architect</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; norm-entrepreneurship capital</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)</strong></td><td>KU33 investigative-integrity champion</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation in practice</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S, party leader)</strong></td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Her position on KU33 will decide second-reading coalition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td>Liberal identity</td><td>Coalition partner most press-freedom sensitive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</strong></td><td>V leader</td><td>Campaign voice against KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP, språkrör)</strong></td><td>MP leader</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional review</td><td>Pending yttrande is the single most consequential upcoming signal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong></td><td>Ukraine President</td><td>Hague Convention co-signatory Dec 2025</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/KU32</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict language ⇒ R2 ↓ 4; silent ⇒ R2 ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>May–Jun 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote (vilande beslut)</strong> on KU33/KU32</td><td>First-reading confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>Late-May / Jun 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote on HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Tribunal + reparations accession</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous</td><td><strong>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins</strong></td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO joint remissvar (SJF, TU, Utgivarna)</strong></td><td>Sets interpretive record on "formellt tillförd bevisning"</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td><strong>Swedish general election</strong></td><td>Post-election composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -421,12 +421,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>DIW v1.0 methodology applied; sensitivity analysis confirms top rank</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All 6 documents with weighted ≥ 5.0 covered</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (first reading)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Established patterns; committee record clear</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (<strong>second</strong> reading)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on 2026 election outcome — inherent uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation prediction</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Interpretively fragile; three plausible postures documented</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Historical pattern suggests rising, but exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US administration tribunal position</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; shift possible</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -478,10 +478,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SYN-ID</strong></td><td>SYN-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>realtime-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-16 14:00 UTC → 2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-realtime-monitor (Copilot Opus 4.7)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodologies Applied</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.0, political-swot-framework, political-risk-methodology, political-threat-framework, political-classification-guide</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>get_propositioner</code>, <code>get_betankanden</code>, <code>search_dokument</code>, <code>search_regering</code>, <code>get_dokument</code>, <code>get_g0v_document_content</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Freshness</strong></td><td>&#x3C; 1 minute at query time — FRESH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The 24 hours between 2026-04-16 14:00 UTC and 2026-04-17 14:34 UTC produced the <strong>single most consequential democratic-infrastructure development</strong> of the 2025/26 Riksmöte: the <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</strong> approved first readings of two <strong>grundlag amendments</strong> — <code>HD01KU32</code> (media accessibility under the <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> and <em>Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen</em>) and <code>HD01KU33</code> (removing "allmän handling" status from digital material seized in husrannsakan). Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes straddling a general election, the 2026 campaign will be shaped by — and will shape — the second reading. KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF transparency in years</strong>, touching a 1766 constitutional text that is older than the United States. Separately, FM <strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> tabled historic Ukraine-accountability propositions <code>HD03231</code> (Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression — first since Nuremberg) and <code>HD03232</code> (International Compensation Commission), while <strong>Civilutskottet (CU)</strong> advanced the national condominium register (<code>HD01CU28</code>) and property-transfer AML rules (<code>HD01CU27</code>). The cluster reveals a government executing a coordinated pre-election legislative sprint across four vectors: democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, housing-market integrity, and quality-of-life deregulation. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Decision</strong>: Lead article with <strong>Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms</strong> (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33). <strong>Re-weighting rationale</strong>: Raw significance score favours HD03231 (news-value), but <strong>democratic-impact weighting</strong> prioritises grundlag-level changes that are systemic, long-tail, and directly reshape citizens' access rights and press freedom under Sweden's 1766 TF. Ukraine accountability is tabled as <strong>co-prominent secondary coverage</strong> — historically important and globally newsworthy, but institutionally one more step in an already-established Swedish foreign-policy trajectory (Ukraine aid since 2022, NATO March 2024). The KU amendments are the <strong>novel democratic event</strong> of the day.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision
 <p><strong>Democratic-impact weighting doctrine</strong> (documented in <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> update): grundlag amendments receive +25% to +40% weight because their effects are <strong>systemic, constitutional, and durable</strong> rather than policy-cyclical. This prevents news-value bias from crowding out democratic-infrastructure stories.</p>
 <p><strong>Anti-pattern avoidance</strong>: Earlier draft of this synthesis ordered Ukraine as LEAD on raw significance; corrected after <code>[NEW REQUIREMENT]</code> signal that democratic-impact weighting must dominate when grundlag amendments are in play.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28">📚 Documents Analysed: 6 (Level-3 depth for KU33; Level-2 for KU32/HD03231/HD03232/CU27/CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28">📚 Documents Analysed: 6 (Level-3 depth for KU33; Level-2 for KU32/HD03231/HD03232/CU27/CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231hd03232cu27cu28"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-analysed-6-level-3-depth-for-ku33-level-2-for-ku32hd03231h
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Date</th><th align="center">Raw / Weighted</th><th align="center">Depth Level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Search/Seizure Digital Materials (constitutional)</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">7 / <strong>9.8</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 L3 Intelligence</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Media Accessibility (constitutional)</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">6.6 / <strong>8.25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 L3 Intelligence</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine Aggression Tribunal</td><td>Prop</td><td>UU (receiving)</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td align="center">9 / 8.55</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Compensation Commission</td><td>Prop</td><td>UU (receiving)</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td align="center">8 / 7.60</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>National Condominium Register</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property Transfer Identity Requirements</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">🟠 L2 Strategic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cluster-map">🗺️ Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cluster-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-map">🗺️ Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph CL1["📜 Cluster 1 — Constitutional First Reading (KU) — LEAD / Democratic Tier-1"]
         HD01KU33["HD01KU33&#x3C;br/>Search &#x26; Seizure&#x3C;br/>Bet 2025/26:KU33&#x3C;br/>🏛️ LEAD"]
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-cluster-map">🗺️ Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style CONTEXT_ZEL fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF
     style CONTEXT_CRIME fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Finding</th><th>Evidence (dok_id / source)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Democratic Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td>KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF's offentlighetsprincip</strong> in the digital-evidence sphere — modifies a 1766 text that predates the U.S. Constitution</td><td>HD01KU33 betänkande; TF 1766 original text; KU committee record</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>Two-reading requirement (8 kap. RF) means KU32/KU33 become <strong>election-campaign material</strong> — the 2026 valrörelse will shape the second reading in the new Riksdag</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33 summaries; 8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>KU33's exception — "allmän handling" status preserved only when material is <em>formally incorporated as evidence</em> — creates an interpretive frontier; narrow interpretation by a future government could systematically shield police operations from insyn</td><td>HD01KU33 text; Lagrådet review pending</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F4</td><td>KU32 establishes a <strong>precedent</strong> that EU obligations can expand ordinary-law intrusion into grundlag-protected sphere (e-books, e-commerce, streaming) — future Parliaments may use this template to further compress grundlag protections</td><td>HD01KU32 betänkande; EU Accessibility Act 2019/882</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) = founding-member status → Sweden's largest norm-entrepreneurship commitment since NATO accession; no direct fiscal burden (reparations funded from Russian immobilised assets EUR 260B)</td><td>HD03231 proposition; HD03232 proposition; G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM (foreign-policy)</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td>Nuremberg framing is <strong>politically deliberate</strong> — unifies cross-party support and pre-empts SD/domestic criticism</td><td>FM Stenergard verbatim statement 2026-04-16</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>CU27/CU28 extend government's organised-crime agenda into property markets (~2M bostadsrätter); CU28's Lantmäteriet register is a 2M-record IT migration by Jan 2027</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28; organised-crime policy lineage</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td><strong>Cross-cluster interference</strong>: the government's political bandwidth is split between defending KU33 (domestic press-freedom scrutiny) and championing HD03231 (international press-freedom positioning via accountability for Russian war crimes); this is a <strong>rhetorical tension</strong> opposition parties may exploit</td><td>political-swot-framework.md §"TOWS Interference"; campaign-rhetoric analysis</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from risk-assessment.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from risk-assessment.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Composite Political Risk — Apr 10-17 2026"
     x-axis ["Apr 10", "Apr 11", "Apr 12", "Apr 13", "Apr 14", "Apr 15", "Apr 16", "Apr 17"]
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Land
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1 — Russian hybrid retaliation (post-tribunal)</td><td align="center">16 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2 — KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>MITIGATE</strong> (press freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>R3 — Tribunal effectiveness without US</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE MITIGATION</td></tr><tr><td>R4 — KU32 precedent for further grundlag erosion</td><td align="center">10 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R5 — Reparations fatigue (decadal)</td><td align="center">9 / 25</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R6 — Property register implementation</td><td align="center">8 / 25</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-party-political-dynamics">🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-party-political-dynamics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-party-political-dynamics">🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-political-dynamics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-party-political-dynamics">🎭 Cross-Party Political Dynamics<
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">KU33 (press freedom)</th><th align="center">KU32 (accessibility)</th><th align="center">Ukraine Props</th><th align="center">Housing (CU)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>M (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For (proposing)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Support)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For (AML angle)</td><td align="center">🟡 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (Nuremberg framing aligns)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 <strong>Divided</strong> (press-freedom history)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Against</strong> likely at 2nd reading</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (accountability lens)</td><td align="center">🟡 Divided</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Against</strong> likely at 2nd reading</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Synthesis</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: KU33 passes the first reading comfortably but the <strong>second reading</strong> after Sep 2026 election is <strong>not guaranteed</strong> — V/MP will almost certainly vote against; S fractures possible. If the new Riksdag produces a left-leaning majority, KU33 could fall. Ukraine consensus ≈ 349 MPs (near-universal). KU32 cross-party. CU broad.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicator
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner / Source</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Riksdag chamber vote on HD01KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>KU referral → kammarvote (vilande beslut)</td><td>Kammaren, KU</td><td align="center"><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td>Press-freedom NGO positions (TU, Utgivarna, SJF)</td><td>Remissvar + debate submissions</td><td><code>search_anforanden</code></td><td align="center">Continuous to 2nd reading</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td>S leadership position on KU33 (hardens for/against)</td><td>Partiledarskap statements</td><td>Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td>Lagrådets yttrande on KU amendments</td><td>Published opinion</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>US administration position on tribunal</td><td>White House statement</td><td><code>search_regering</code></td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W6</td><td>Russian hybrid-warfare escalation</td><td>SÄPO annual report; Nordic events</td><td>SÄPO, MUST</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>W7</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition → KU33 2nd-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten preliminary</td><td>Valmyndigheten</td><td align="center">Oct–Nov 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W8</td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on HD03231/HD03232</td><td>UU committee → kammarvote</td><td>Kammaren, UU</td><td align="center">Late May / June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W9</td><td>Lantmäteriet register IT procurement (HD01CU28)</td><td>Anbud notice</td><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W10</td><td>First case filed at Hague tribunal</td><td>Docket opens</td><td>Council of Europe</td><td align="center">H2 2026 or later</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Sensitivity analysis in <code>significance-scoring.md</code> confirms top rank under all plausible weight swaps</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All six documents with weighted ≥ 5.0 covered</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Established patterns; committee record clear</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party <strong>second-reading</strong> vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on 2026 election outcome</td></tr><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation prediction</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Interpretively fragile; three plausible postures in <code>HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md</code> §4</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Rising baseline, exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal-cooperation trajectory</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation-commission payout speed</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>UNCC precedent is 31 years; asset-use architecture in flux</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Before accepting the base narrative, stress-test the assumptions. What if the analyst consensus is wrong?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's Ad
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Challenge</th><th>Mainstream View</th><th>Devil's-Advocate View</th><th>Analytic Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>KU33 = "press-freedom regression"?</strong></td><td>Narrowing of 1766 TF is a democratic step backwards</td><td>Norway (RSF #1), Finland (#5), Denmark (#3) operate <strong>equivalent regimes</strong> and have higher press-freedom rankings than Sweden. KU33 may normalise the Nordic mainstream rather than regress from it.</td><td>Both true simultaneously: Nordic normalisation is real; interpretive-frontier risk is real. The deciding variable is whether "formellt tillförd bevisning" is statutorily anchored (Nordic-model) or administratively fluid (Swedish-specific risk).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine tribunal as "historic"?</strong></td><td>First aggression tribunal since Nuremberg</td><td>Without US + China + major Global South participation, tribunal could be <strong>symbolically historic but operationally marginal</strong> — ICC's aggression limitation applies to the same state actors</td><td>Symbolic value has independent weight (deterrence + norm-building). Operational effectiveness is a separable question. Both analyses required.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet will calibrate interpretation?</strong></td><td>Sweden's constitutional-review tradition usually produces strict scoping</td><td>Lagrådet yttranden can be silent or ambivalent on specific interpretive questions; historical examples: FRA-lagen 2008</td><td>Base rate of Lagrådet silence on specific interpretive questions ≈ 25–35%. Plan for the silent-Lagrådet scenario (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Wildcard-1).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-cluster rhetorical tension will be exploited?</strong></td><td>V/MP will lead "press freedom abroad vs home" framing</td><td>Opposition may struggle to mobilise attentive-voter base beyond 2008 FRA-lagen levels (Piratpartiet 7.13% in EP 2009); Ukraine consensus is sticky</td><td>Tension exists as <strong>latent</strong> threat vector. Activation requires specific triggering event (Wildcard-1 scenario).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD realignment risk on Ukraine?</strong></td><td>Very low (consistent 2022–26 support)</td><td>Populist-right parties across Europe have shown realignment in 2024–26; Swedish-specific resistance not permanent</td><td>Watch R10 indicator: SD national-programme language + Åkesson speeches during 2026 campaign.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Housing register as AML success?</strong></td><td>Closes laundering blind spot</td><td>Organised-crime actors adapt rapidly (crypto, offshore entities); register may only displace rather than eliminate</td><td>Displacement effect real but measurable; KPI: prosecution conviction rate in AML+property cases 2027–29.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know">❓ Key Uncertainties (What We Cannot Yet Know)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know">❓ Key Uncertainties (What We Cannot Yet Know)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-what-we-cannot-yet-know">❓ Key Uncertainties (Wh
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Uncertainty</th><th>Decision Impact</th><th align="center">Resolution Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>U1</td><td><strong>Will Lagrådet scope "formellt tillförd bevisning" strictly?</strong></td><td>Primary driver of KU33 interpretive trajectory</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U2</td><td><strong>Will S party leadership endorse or oppose KU33?</strong></td><td>Decisive for second-reading coalition</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U3</td><td><strong>Will post-Sep-2026 Riksdag composition support KU33 ratification?</strong></td><td>Go / no-go for grundlag change</td><td align="center">Sep 13 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U4</td><td><strong>Will US administration cooperate with HD03231 tribunal?</strong></td><td>Tribunal effectiveness</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U5</td><td><strong>Will G7 coalition sustain asset-immobilisation architecture?</strong></td><td>Reparations funding viability</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>U6</td><td><strong>Will Russian hybrid-warfare response escalate above threshold?</strong></td><td>Security posture + campaign dynamics</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened pre-election)</td></tr><tr><td>U7</td><td><strong>Will Lantmäteriet register IT delivery hit Jan 2027 target?</strong></td><td>HD01CU28 policy credibility</td><td align="center">Q4 2026 procurement</td></tr><tr><td>U8</td><td><strong>Will interpretive drift in förvaltningsdomstolar favour police discretion?</strong></td><td>Long-term R2 trajectory</td><td align="center">2027–2030 first rulings</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory">🔬 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — KU33 Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory">🔬 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — KU33 Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory"></a></h3>
 <p>Testing four hypotheses against the evidence base (adapted from Heuer's ACH methodology):</p>
 
 
@@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach--ku33-trajectory">🔬 Analysis
 <p><strong>ACH conclusion</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: H1 (Proportionate Reform) and H2 (Narrow Interpretation — "chilling") have <strong>equal evidentiary weight</strong>. This is consistent with the <strong>interpretive-frontier finding</strong> — the reform is literally two reforms in superposition, and the collapse is triggered by Lagrådet + legislator intent + prosecutorial practice.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster S
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Combination</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine S × KU33 T</strong></td><td>Government championing Nuremberg-style accountability abroad while narrowing TF at home → rhetorical exposure</td><td>Opposition talking point: <em>"Sweden defends press freedom elsewhere while compressing it at home"</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Housing O × Constitutional W</strong></td><td>AML register (CU28) architecture synergy with KU33 investigative-integrity rhetoric → coherent "clean institutions" narrative</td><td>Government legitimising frame: <em>"modernising institutions under rule of law"</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine T × Constitutional S</strong></td><td>Russian retaliation may target both foreign-policy signal (Stockholm embassies, cable infrastructure) and campaign discourse (KU33 framing)</td><td>Threat compounding: two independent targets, one adversary</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>(Full TOWS matrix in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS.)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-artifacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-artifacts"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Reference-grade dossier files</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md">Comparative International</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></li>
@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1289,8 +1289,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SIG-ID</strong></td><td>SIG-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-16 → 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 + <strong>Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) v1.0</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scoring-method">📐 Scoring Method<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scoring-method"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each">Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 each)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-method">📐 Scoring Method<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-method"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each">Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 each)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Parliamentary Impact</strong> — committee size, coalition implications, multi-party engagement</li>
 <li><strong>Policy Impact</strong> — scope of policy change, sector reach</li>
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-score-0-10-each">Five-Dimension Raw Score (0-10 ea
 <li><strong>Cross-Party Significance</strong> — coalition strain or cross-party consensus</li>
 </ol>
 <p>Composite Score = weighted average of five dimensions; <strong>DIW multiplier</strong> is applied last to reflect democratic-infrastructure durability.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) — v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) — v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong>: Raw significance captures news-value. But <strong>democratic-impact weighting</strong> prioritises legislation that shapes the rules under which future politics operates — constitutional amendments, electoral law, grundlag changes, and press-freedom infrastructure. These have <strong>systemic, long-tail effects</strong> that outlast policy cycles. Without DIW, news-value alone can over-weight foreign-policy moments and under-weight constitutional events whose effects compound for decades.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw--v10">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document Type</th><th align="center">DIW Multiplier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Grundlag amendment (TF / YGL / RF / SO) — narrowing public access / press freedom</td><td align="center"><strong>×1.40</strong></td><td>Irreversible without second constitutional amendment; compounds over decades</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag amendment — expanding rights</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td>Durable; positive asymmetry</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law — electoral / democratic-process</td><td align="center">×1.20</td><td>Rules-of-the-game change</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign-policy proposition — historic precedent</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td>High news-value; institutional continuity with prior commitments</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law — policy-cyclical</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td>Baseline</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law — market / AML</td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td>Marginal durability premium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-five-dimension-scoring">🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-five-dimension-scoring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-scoring">🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-scoring"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-five-dimension-scoring">🏛️ Five-Dimension Scoring<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Parliamentary</th><th align="center">Policy</th><th align="center">Public Interest</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Cross-Party</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th align="center">Weighted</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>7.0</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>×1.40</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.8</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center"><strong>6.6</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>×1.25</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>📜 CO-LEAD</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>9.0</strong></td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>🌍 Secondary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>8.0</strong></td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td>🤝 Secondary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU28</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>5.8</strong></td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>5.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MEDIUM</td><td>🏠 Tertiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU27</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>5.4</strong></td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>5.67</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MEDIUM</td><td>🏠 Tertiary</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-decision">📊 Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision">📊 Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-decision">📊 Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Decision</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Publication threshold</strong></td><td>Weighted ≥ 7.0 → publish as featured; ≥ 5.0 → publish as secondary coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lead Story</strong></td><td><strong>HD01KU33 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Narrowing</strong> (Weighted 9.8)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Co-Lead</strong></td><td><strong>HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility Constitutional Amendment</strong> (Weighted 8.25)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Prominent Secondary</strong></td><td><strong>HD03231 + HD03232 Ukraine Accountability</strong> (Weighted 8.55 / 7.60)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tertiary</strong></td><td><strong>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 Housing/AML</strong> (Weighted 5.67 / 5.80)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td>🔴 Breaking (multi-cluster package)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Languages</strong></td><td>EN + SV (primary); 12 others via news-translate workflow</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank">🎯 Headline Direction (Enforced Against Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank">🎯 Headline Direction (Enforced Against Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary framing</strong>: <em>"Sweden's Riksdag Advances Constitutional Press Freedom Reforms"</em> — reflects the <strong>#1 weighted rank</strong> (HD01KU33).</p>
 <p><strong>Co-prominent coverage</strong>: Ukraine accountability architecture (HD03231/HD03232) — <strong>MUST be covered as a major section</strong>; omission is an editorial failure (see <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"Lead-Story Enforcement Gate").</p>
 <p><strong>Banned omissions</strong> in published article:</p>
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--headline-direction-enforced-against-weighted-rank">🎯 Headline Dir
 <li>❌ Leading with document whose weighted score is not the run's #1</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps">🧮 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Ranking Hold Under Weight Swaps?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps">🧮 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Ranking Hold Under Weight Swaps?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>How robust is HD01KU33's #1 ranking to plausible variations in the Democratic-Impact Weighting?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-ranking-hold-under-weight-swaps">🧮
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">HD01KU33 Weight</th><th align="center">HD03231 Weight</th><th align="center">HD01KU32 Weight</th><th>Top 3 Result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Baseline (DIW v1.0)</strong></td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td><strong>KU33 (9.80), HD03231 (8.55), KU32 (8.25)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>News-value dominant (no DIW)</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td>HD03231 (9.00), <strong>KU33 (7.00)</strong>, HD03232 (8.00)</td></tr><tr><td>Aggressive democratic weighting</td><td align="center">×1.60</td><td align="center">×0.90</td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td><strong>KU33 (11.20)</strong>, <strong>KU32 (9.24)</strong>, HD03231 (8.10)</td></tr><tr><td>Conservative democratic weighting</td><td align="center">×1.20</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">×1.10</td><td><strong>KU33 (8.40)</strong>, HD03231 (9.00), KU32 (7.26)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign-policy bonus (rare)</td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center">×1.30</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td>HD03231 (11.70), <strong>KU33 (9.80)</strong>, HD03232 (10.40)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity finding</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: KU33 holds the <strong>#1 position under DIW v1.0 + the two "democratic weighting" variants (3 of 5 scenarios)</strong>. Raw news-value ranking flips to HD03231 (as expected). Foreign-policy bonus (rarely justified) also flips. The DIW v1.0 outcome is <strong>robust to reasonable variation</strong> in democratic-impact weights but <strong>sensitive to whether democratic-impact weighting is applied at all</strong>. This validates the methodology choice but highlights the importance of disciplined application.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view">Alternative Rankings — Committee-First View<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view">Alternative Rankings — Committee-First View<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view"></a></h4>
 <p>If one applies a <strong>committee-first</strong> ranking (heavier weight to constitutional-committee output regardless of document-type), KU33 leads by even wider margin.</p>
 
 
@@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-alternative-rankings--committee-first-view">Alternative Rankings —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Committee-First Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">10.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">9.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">8.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">7.20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-decision-audit">🎯 Publication-Decision Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-decision-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision-audit">🎯 Publication-Decision Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1624,14 +1624,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-decision-audit">🎯 Publication-Decision Audit<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th align="center">Locked At</th><th>By</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead = HD01KU33</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Analyst + DIW</td><td>Top weighted score (9.80); constitutional significance</td></tr><tr><td>Co-lead = HD01KU32</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Analyst + DIW</td><td>Same grundlag package; interpretive pairing</td></tr><tr><td>Co-prominent = HD03231 + HD03232</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Coverage-completeness rule</td><td>Both weighted > 7.0</td></tr><tr><td>Secondary = HD01CU28 + HD01CU27</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>Broad-coverage rule</td><td>Weighted 5.80 + 5.67</td></tr><tr><td>Excluded = HD03246</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:45</td><td>De-duplication</td><td>Already covered realtime-0029</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--anti-pattern-log">🔍 Anti-Pattern Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--anti-pattern-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-anti-pattern-log">🔍 Anti-Pattern Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-pattern-log"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Historical failure</strong> (self-documented 2026-04-17 post-review): The original published article <strong>omitted HD03231 and HD03232 entirely</strong>, despite their weighted scores being 8.55 and 7.60. Although the lead-story selection (Constitutional Reforms) was correct under DIW, the failure to include Ukraine accountability as co-prominent coverage represents a <strong>coverage-completeness failure</strong>. The fix is the <strong>Lead-Story Enforcement Gate</strong> added to SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md, which requires articles to cover all documents with weighted score ≥ 7.0.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>STK-ID</strong></td><td>STK-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>6-lens stakeholder matrix (power × interest × position × capacity × resource × time-horizon)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Focus</strong></td><td>Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (LEAD) · Ukraine Accountability · Housing/AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-stakeholder-framework.md</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix (Quantified, 0–10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix (Quantified, 0–10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1839,13 +1839,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix-quantified-010">📊 Stakeholder Positio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Power</th><th align="center">Interest</th><th align="center">KU33 Position (−5 to +5)</th><th align="center">Ukraine Props Position</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government (M/KD/L)</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">+5</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>Kristersson, Stenergard co-sign; M-KD-L party statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (parliamentary support)</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">+4 (AML/gäng alignment)</td><td align="center">+3 (Nuremberg framing)</td><td>SD law-and-order + Nuremberg-compatible rhetoric</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>0 to −2</strong> (divided)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>Historical press-freedom doctrine vs law-and-order bloc internal tension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong></td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>−4</strong></td><td align="center">+3 (accountability only)</td><td>V's Riksdag press-freedom record 2018-2025</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>−4</strong></td><td align="center">+5</td><td>MP's grundlag-protection doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">+2 (cautious)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>C liberal-centrist profile</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Journalistförbundet (SJF)</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>−5</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td>Historical TF-protection stance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Utgivarna / TU</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>−4</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td>Publisher-editor professional mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Amnesty Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">−3 (privacy/access concerns)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>International accountability priority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polismyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td align="center">+2</td><td>Operational beneficiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Åklagarmyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">+5</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>Prosecution effectiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lantmäteriet</strong></td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Executes CU28 register Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Handikappförbund (DHR/FUB)</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9 (KU32)</td><td align="center"><strong>+5 (KU32)</strong></td><td align="center">+1</td><td>KU32 accessibility beneficiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">Pending</td><td align="center">Pending</td><td>Review in progress</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky gov)</strong></td><td align="center">7 (in Ukraine context)</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Co-architect of Hague Convention Dec 2025</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF gov)</strong></td><td align="center">8 (hostile)</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center"><strong>−5</strong></td><td>Designated SE "unfriendly" 2022</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU institutions</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">+2 (EAA compliance)</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>EU foreign-policy alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">+1</td><td align="center">+5</td><td>Tribunal framework body</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration</strong></td><td align="center">10 (global)</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center"><strong>0 to +2</strong> (ambiguous)</td><td>Historical ICC reluctance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden public (polling)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">0 (low awareness)</td><td align="center">+4 (60-70% support since 2022)</td><td>Novus/SOM polling patterns</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-1-citizens--swedish-public">🏛️ 1. Citizens &#x26; Swedish Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-1-citizens--swedish-public"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-public">🏛️ 1. Citizens &#x26; Swedish Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--swedish-public"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position on LEAD (KU33/KU32)</strong>: Low public awareness of grundlag mechanics; amendments typically salient only to attentive publics (~15%) <code>[MEDIUM]</code>. Press-freedom framing in 2026 campaign will raise awareness asymmetrically — V/MP electorates mobilise faster than median voter.</p>
 <p><strong>Position on Ukraine Accountability</strong>: Strong support — polling consistently <strong>60-70%+ support for Ukraine aid</strong> since 2022 (SOM Institute, Novus) <code>[HIGH]</code>. Nuremberg framing resonates.</p>
 <p><strong>Position on Housing (CU27/CU28)</strong>: Direct impact on ~2M bostadsrätter households; generally positive consumer-protection reception <code>[MEDIUM]</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral implications</strong>: KU33 risks becoming a <strong>second-order campaign issue</strong> that shifts attentive-voter preferences at the margin — V/MP could gain 0.5-1.5 pp each; S faces internal tension over whether to counter-position.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Strongly supportive of all measures — proposing and defending them.</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The package demonstrates "governing competence across domains — constitutional reform, foreign-policy leadership, housing-market modernisation, everyday-life simplification."</p>
 <p><strong>Risk exposure</strong>:</p>
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition
 <li><strong>Erik Slottner (KD, Civil Affairs)</strong>: Housing/register execution</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Ukraine</strong>: Strongly supportive — S led Sweden's 2022 Ukraine response under PM Magdalena Andersson <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -1891,14 +1891,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / M
 <li><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP, språkrör)</strong>: Grundlag-protection advocate</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--4-business--industry">🏢 4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--4-business--industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">🏢 4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Real estate sector</strong> (Mäklarsamfundet, FMI): Broadly supportive of CU28 condominium register (reduces market uncertainty and mispricing risk). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Banks &#x26; mortgage lenders</strong> (SEB, Swedbank, Handelsbanken, SBAB): Supportive — cleaner pledge/mortgage registration reduces collateral risk; AML compliance cost offset by data-quality gain. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Defence industry</strong> (Saab, BAE Bofors): Neutral on accountability measures; benefits from general Ukraine support sustaining procurement trajectory. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Tech / publishing sector</strong>: Interest in accessibility compliance (KU32 e-books, streaming, e-commerce); mixed — cost of implementation vs market-expansion opportunity. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Media</strong> (Bonnier, Schibsted, Stampen): <strong>Concerned about KU33</strong> — see risk of source-erosion affecting investigative desks. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--5-civil-society">🌐 5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--5-civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">🌐 5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Press-freedom organisations</strong> (TU, Utgivarna, SJF, Publicistklubben):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>KU33: <strong>Strongly concerned</strong> — pre-filing remissvar urged; will monitor Lagrådet yttrande closely <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -1919,7 +1919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--5-civil-society">🌐 5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>CU27: Supportive of six-month folkbokförd rule — closes ombildning ghost-tenant loophole <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--6-international-actors">🌍 6. International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--6-international-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-actors">🌍 6. International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--6-international-actors">🌍 6. International Actors<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Ukraine Props Position</th><th align="center">KU33 Position</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Central proponent</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td>Hague Convention signed Dec 16 2025 with Zelensky present</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Framework body</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td>Tribunal legitimacy backstop; Venice Commission may later comment on KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU institutions</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly supportive</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral (supportive of KU32 via EAA)</td><td>Foreign-policy alignment; EAA compliance box ticked</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NATO allies</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Positive</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Sweden's norm-entrepreneurship as new member</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 Hostile</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Will respond rhetorically + hybrid ops</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Ambiguous</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Historical ICC reluctance; tribunal-specific position pending</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RSF / Freedom House</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Will scrutinise</strong></td><td>Sweden's press-freedom index score at risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet</strong>: Pending yttrande — the most consequential upcoming stakeholder signal; will scope the interpretive boundary of KU33</li>
 <li><strong>KU (Konstitutionsutskottet)</strong>: Self-reviewing; committee record has constitutional weight</li>
@@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Co
 <li><strong>ICC</strong>: Complementary relationship — HD03231 fills aggression-jurisdiction gap</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-media--public-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Swedish mainstream media</strong> (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen, SVT):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU33</strong>: Extensive editorial engagement expected — press freedom is a live newsroom stake <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -1994,7 +1994,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class
 <p><strong>International media</strong> (Reuters, AP, AFP, FT, NYT): HD03231 will be picked up globally; KU33 secondary but noted by press-freedom beats (CPJ, RSF blog). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>Social media</strong>: Ukraine solidarity performs; KU33 likely to generate polarised engagement patterns — attentive-voter / activist clusters dominate. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-impact-summary">🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-impact-summary">🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-impact-summary">🎯 Coalition-Impact Summary<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Package</th><th align="center">Coalition Risk</th><th align="center">Second-Reading Risk (KU33 only)</th><th align="center">Campaign Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Constitutional (KU32/KU33)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Low (first reading secured)</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> — depends on post-election composition</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH — KU33 salient wedge</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine Accountability</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Minimal</td><td align="center">N/A (ordinary law)</td><td align="center">🟢 Low — universal consensus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Housing (CU27/CU28)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Minimal</td><td align="center">N/A</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-map">🕸️ Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-map">🕸️ Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Gov["Government Triangle"]
         PM["👤 Kristersson PM (M)"]
@@ -2110,7 +2110,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-map">🕸️ Influence-Network Map<a class="" a
     style Ms fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style Mu fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading">🌲 Coalition-Fracture Probability Tree (KU33 Second Reading)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading">🌲 Coalition-Fracture Probability Tree (KU33 Second Reading)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T["🟡 Post-Sep 2026 Election"]
     T --> COMP{"Riksdag&#x3C;br/>composition"}
@@ -2145,8 +2145,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-fracture-probability-tree-ku33-second-reading">🌲 Coalit
 <li><strong>P(revised / stricter language path)</strong> ≈ <strong>0.15</strong></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-named-actor-briefing-cards">🎙️ Named-Actor Briefing Cards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-named-actor-briefing-cards"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader">Card 1 — Magdalena Andersson (S, former PM, current party leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actor-briefing-cards">🎙️ Named-Actor Briefing Cards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-briefing-cards"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader">Card 1 — Magdalena Andersson (S, former PM, current party leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position (projected)</strong>: Pragmatic — likely supports constitutional-integrity framing of KU33 if Lagrådet scopes strictly</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Decisive for second-reading coalition</li>
@@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-1--magdalena-andersson-s-former-pm-current-party-leader">Card 1
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: First major speech after Lagrådet yttrande</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — S-internal dynamics are fluid</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister">Card 2 — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister">Card 2 — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Owner of investigative-integrity rationale for KU33</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Defines how "formellt tillförd bevisning" is prosecutorially applied</li>
@@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-2--gunnar-strömmer-m-justice-minister">Card 2 — Gunnar Ström
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Guidance to prosecutors post-amendment</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective">Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective">Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Constitutional review body</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: <strong>Single most consequential upcoming signal</strong> in this run</li>
@@ -2170,7 +2170,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-3--lagrådet-collective">Card 3 — Lagrådet (Collective)<a cla
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Yttrande text on "formellt tillförd bevisning"</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader">Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader">Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Committed KU33 opposition; press-freedom framing</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Amplify attentive-voter mobilisation on press-freedom issue</li>
@@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-4--nooshi-dadgostar-v-leader">Card 4 — Nooshi Dadgostar (V lea
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Campaign launch speech + KU33 salience in polling</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm">Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm">Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Ukraine accountability architect; Nuremberg-framing author</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: Sweden's foreign-policy capital + norm-entrepreneurship credentials</li>
@@ -2186,7 +2186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-5--maria-malmer-stenergard-m-fm">Card 5 — Maria Malmer Stenerg
 <li><strong>Key signal</strong>: Dec 2026 annual foreign-policy speech</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader">Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader">Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD leader)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Parliamentary-support leverage on all four clusters</li>
 <li><strong>Leverage</strong>: 9–10% campaign talking-point reserves</li>
@@ -2197,7 +2197,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-card-6--jimmie-åkesson-sd-leader">Card 6 — Jimmie Åkesson (SD lea
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2228,7 +2228,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative, surface wildcards, and assign prior probabilities analysts can update as forward indicators fire.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scenario-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scenario-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-17&#x3C;br/>KU first reading"]
     L["⚖️ Lagrådet yttrande&#x3C;br/>Q2 2026"]
@@ -2277,8 +2277,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p>Probabilities are <strong>analyst priors</strong> expressed in a zero-sum tree. They will be Bayesian-updated as Lagrådet and polling signals arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Proportionate Reform" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Proportionate Reform" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande calibrates the interpretation; government retains majority; S leadership endorses amendment; second reading passes.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals confirming this scenario:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--narrow-proportionate-reform-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Narrow, Pro
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH — this is the DIW-consistent central projection.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020">🔵 BULL-LITE — "Cross-Party Constitutional Statesmanship" (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020">🔵 BULL-LITE — "Cross-Party Constitutional Statesmanship" (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: S takes leadership, negotiates <strong>stricter interpretive language</strong> into the amendment before second reading. Amendment passes with S+M+KD+L+C joint stamp.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull-lite--cross-party-constitutional-statesmanship-p--020">🔵 BUL
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Watch</strong>: S-internal dynamics (Tage Erlander / Olof Palme tradition vs law-and-order wing).</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015">🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading Collapse" (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015">🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading Collapse" (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Left bloc gains in Sep 2026 election; V+MP+S-left majority blocks KU33 at second reading.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear--second-reading-collapse-p--015">🔴 BEAR — "Second-Reading
 <li>Opposition governing in 2026–2030 faces coalition-composition challenges on Ukraine, housing, defence</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005">🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005">🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet ambivalent; amendment passes; over 5+ years narrow interpretation entrenches in förvaltningsdomstol.</p>
 <p><strong>Key signals:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--mixed--interpretive-drift-p--005">🟠 MIXED — "Interpretive Drift
 <p><strong>Consequences</strong>: Long-tail democratic-infrastructure harm without acute crisis — the <strong>slow-rot scenario</strong> that's hardest to counter politically.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this scenario matters</strong>: It is the most likely path for S4 × T1 interference to become T4 (systemic chilling).</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Crisis" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Crisis" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: A high-profile case emerges (2026–2028) where investigative journalism was materially blocked by KU33 interpretation.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade:</strong></p>
 <ol>
@@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--chilling-crisis-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Chilling Cri
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Probability reasoning</strong>: Moderate baseline × chilling-effect prior; elevated if Lagrådet leaves language loose.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "Russian Hybrid Escalation Reshapes Campaign" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "Russian Hybrid Escalation Reshapes Campaign" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: Major cyber / sabotage / disinformation event attributable to Russia during 2026 campaign — e.g., attack on Swedish government infrastructure, Nordic energy / data cable, or large-scale disinformation op.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade:</strong></p>
 <ol>
@@ -2366,7 +2366,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--russian-hybrid-escalation-reshapes-campaign-p--010">⚡
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Probability reasoning</strong>: Historical pattern after Sweden's NATO accession + tribunal founding-member status; SÄPO 2024 assessment signals elevated baseline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities--rolled-up">🧮 Scenario Probabilities — Rolled Up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities--rolled-up"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities--rolled-up">🧮 Scenario Probabilities — Rolled Up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities--rolled-up"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities--rolled-up">🧮 Scenario Probabilities — R
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outcome</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 enters force in any form</td><td align="center"><strong>0.67</strong> (Base 0.42 + Bull-Lite 0.20 + Mixed 0.05)</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 enters force with strict / narrow-test lock-in</td><td align="center"><strong>0.55</strong> (Base 0.42 × strict-interpretation share + Bull-Lite 0.20)</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 fails in post-election Riksdag</td><td align="center"><strong>0.15</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom-index downgrade within 3 years</td><td align="center"><strong>0.25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid event reshapes campaign</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal achieves first case by 2028</td><td align="center"><strong>0.55</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal stalled or boycotted</td><td align="center"><strong>0.30</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors">🎯 Monitoring Indicators (What Flips Priors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors">🎯 Monitoring Indicators (What Flips Priors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--monitoring-indicators-what-flips-priors">🎯 Monitoring Indicators
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Direction</th><th align="center">Prior-Update Magnitude</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande strict</td><td align="center">↑ Base, Bull-Lite</td><td align="center">+0.15 combined</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet silent on interpretation</td><td align="center">↑ Mixed, Wildcard-1</td><td align="center">+0.10 combined</td></tr><tr><td>S party-leader pro-KU33 speech</td><td align="center">↑ Base, Bull-Lite</td><td align="center">+0.10</td></tr><tr><td>S party-leader anti-KU33 speech</td><td align="center">↑ Bear</td><td align="center">+0.10</td></tr><tr><td>RSF/Freedom House downgrade</td><td align="center">↑ Wildcard-1</td><td align="center">+0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic cable / cyber event</td><td align="center">↑ Wildcard-2</td><td align="center">+0.05–0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Opinion polling: press-freedom > 10 % campaign salience</td><td align="center">↑ Bear</td><td align="center">+0.05</td></tr><tr><td>US public tribunal endorsement</td><td align="center">N/A for KU; ↓ Tribunal-stalled</td><td align="center">−0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine HD03231 commencement date slips > 6 months</td><td align="center">↑ Tribunal-stalled</td><td align="center">+0.10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications">🛠️ Scenario-Driven Editorial &#x26; Policy Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications">🛠️ Scenario-Driven Editorial &#x26; Policy Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2507,7 +2507,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-scenario-driven-editorial--policy-implications">🛠️ Scenario-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Editorial Framing Implication</th><th>Policy Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BASE</td><td>Frame as <em>"narrow, proportionate reform"</em>; foreground Lagrådet role</td><td>Government should pre-publish interpretive guidance</td></tr><tr><td>BULL-LITE</td><td>Frame as <em>"constitutional craftsmanship moment"</em>; credit cross-party S</td><td>S/M joint statesmanship opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR</td><td>Frame as <em>"democratic brake working as designed"</em></td><td>Opposition needs clear alternative investigative-integrity plan</td></tr><tr><td>MIXED</td><td>Frame as <em>"interpretive vigilance required"</em>; JO centrality</td><td>NGO litigation fund activation</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD-1</td><td>Frame as <em>"chilling crisis"</em> — accountability lens</td><td>Counter-amendment drafting begins</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD-2</td><td>Frame as <em>"hybrid war changes calculus"</em>; national-security lens</td><td>SÄPO / MSB doctrinal updates</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Red-Team Box informs low-probability path consideration</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Bayesian Update Rules drive scenario priors</li>
@@ -2517,7 +2517,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: Scenario analysis v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RISK-ID</strong></td><td>RSK-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> v3.0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scope</strong></td><td>Constitutional Reforms (PRIMARY) · Ukraine Accountability (SECONDARY) · Housing/AML (TERTIARY)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--aggregate-risk-landscape">🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--aggregate-risk-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregate-risk-landscape">🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-landscape"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Likelihood × Impact (Realtime 1434)
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--aggregate-risk-landscape">🎯 Aggregate Risk Landscape<a class="" a
     R10-SD-Ukraine-Reversal: [0.25, 0.75]
     R11-Register-IT-Delivery-Delay: [0.55, 0.70]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-register">🗂️ Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">🗂️ Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2721,8 +2721,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-register">🗂️ Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Risk ID</th><th>Risk Description</th><th align="center">Cluster</th><th align="center">Likelihood (1-5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1-5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Mitigation Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Russian hybrid retaliation (cyber, disinformation, sabotage) against Sweden as tribunal founding member</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td>SÄPO, MSB, NATO StratCom COE</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R2</strong></td><td>KU33's "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation drifts narrow under a future government — systemic transparency loss</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td>Lagrådet, KU (legislative history), Riksdag ombudsman</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Tribunal (HD03231) effectiveness collapses if US refuses cooperation</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>UD, EU External Action Service, Council of Europe</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R4</strong></td><td>KU32's EU-obligation template reused to justify further grundlag compression (digital platforms, AI content, national security)</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3-4</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>KU, Riksdag constitutional scholars</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R5</strong></td><td>KU33 weaponised in 2026 valrörelse — polarises press freedom into partisan wedge; second-reading coalition fractures</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>Party leaders, party-strategy teams</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R6</strong></td><td>Reparations commission (HD03232) takes decades → political fatigue erodes Ukraine support</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td>Commission secretariat, UD</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R7</strong></td><td>International press-freedom index (RSF, Freedom House) downgrades Sweden after TF amendments</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td>UD, Sida, press-freedom diplomacy</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R8</strong></td><td>Russia seizes assets of Swedish firms in retaliation</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td>Kommerskollegium, EU sanctions policy</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R9</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet register (HD01CU28) IT procurement delayed or suffers data-security breach</td><td align="center">Housing</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td>Lantmäteriet, MSB, Finansdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>SD reverses Ukraine support in 2026 campaign (populist realignment)</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td align="center">1-2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>7</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td>Coalition monitoring, cross-party statesmanship</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R11</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet register (HD01CU28) IT delivery delay or procurement slippage → 2027 rollout misses statutory deadline</td><td align="center">Housing</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td>Lantmäteriet, Finansdepartementet, MSB</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R12</strong></td><td>KU32 accessibility implementation cost exceeds impact assessment → business pushback</td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>4</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td>MPRT, Näringsdepartementet</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive">🔴 Priority Risks (Score ≥ 12) — Deep Dive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score 16, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive">🔴 Priority Risks (Score ≥ 12) — Deep Dive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-score--12--deep-dive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score 16, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Russia has conducted hybrid operations against NATO members following Ukraine-support decisions. Sweden's NATO accession (March 2024) combined with founding-member status in the aggression tribunal and reparations commission creates enhanced targeting.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2739,7 +2739,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-16-high-confidence">R1 — Russian H
 <li>MSB cyber-incident bulletins</li>
 <li>Nordic infrastructure events (cables, power, logistics)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence">R2 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation Entrenchment (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence">R2 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation Entrenchment (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: HD01KU33 preserves "allmän handling" status for seized digital material <strong>only</strong> when it is <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive boundary of "formally incorporated" is <strong>legislatively underspecified</strong> in the public summary. A future government (or shift in prosecutorial practice) could apply a narrow test, functionally shielding large volumes of seized material from offentlighetsprincipen.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2754,7 +2754,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r2--ku33-narrow-interpretation-entrenchment-score-12-medium-confidenc
 <li><strong>Post-vote</strong> (2027-): JO/JK oversight; annual press-freedom reporting; NGO litigation in förvaltningsdomstol.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Bayesian update trigger</strong>: If Lagrådet yttrande is silent on the interpretive test, update likelihood 3 → 4 (score to 16).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence">R3 — Tribunal Effectiveness Without US (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence">R3 — Tribunal Effectiveness Without US (Score 12, MEDIUM Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: The International Criminal Court illustrates the effectiveness cost of US non-participation. Public US statements on HD03231 have been cautious. The tribunal can still operate as a legitimacy platform and set precedent, but enforcement against high-value defendants becomes dependent on arrest-state cooperation.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2762,7 +2762,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r3--tribunal-effectiveness-without-us-score-12-medium-confidence">R3
 <li>Recent US reticence on similar jurisdictional innovations <code>[MEDIUM]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: EU coalition-building; Council of Europe framework provides legitimacy backstop; G7 asset-policy coordination.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence">R5 — KU33 Campaign Weaponisation (Score 12, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence">R5 — KU33 Campaign Weaponisation (Score 12, HIGH Confidence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: V/MP have strong press-freedom commitments and will foreground KU33 in the 2026 campaign. S's leadership has signalled mixed positions — if the S leadership moves against KU33, the second-reading coalition fractures.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2772,7 +2772,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r5--ku33-campaign-weaponisation-score-12-high-confidence">R5 — KU33
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Cross-party statesmanship; early Lagrådet yttrande; NGO engagement by government to pre-empt legitimate concerns.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-trend--7-day">📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-trend--7-day"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-trend--7-day">📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trend--7-day"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'themeVariables': {'xyChart': {'plotColorPalette': '#D32F2F'}}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Composite Political Risk — April 10-17, 2026"
@@ -2786,7 +2786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-trend--7-day">📉 Risk Trend — 7-Day<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <li>Apr 16-17 — Ukraine propositions + KU betänkanden compound into highest reading of week</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-rules">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2842,7 +2842,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Observable Signal</th><th align="center">Direction</th><th align="center">Risk Affected</th><th align="center">Magnitude</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande strict on KU33</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R2</td><td align="center">−4</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande silent on KU33 interpretation</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">R2</td><td align="center">+4</td></tr><tr><td>S-leadership statement supporting KU33</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R5</td><td align="center">−3</td></tr><tr><td>S-leadership statement opposing KU33</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">R5</td><td align="center">+3</td></tr><tr><td>US public statement supporting HD03231</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R3</td><td align="center">−4</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic cable-sabotage or cyber event</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">R1</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr><tr><td>RSF Sweden score unchanged post-amendment</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">R7</td><td align="center">−2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation">🧮 Bayesian Prior / Posterior Illustration — Risk R2 (KU33 Narrow Interpretation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation">🧮 Bayesian Prior / Posterior Illustration — Risk R2 (KU33 Narrow Interpretation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpretation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2889,7 +2889,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-prior--posterior-illustration--risk-r2-ku33-narrow-interpre
 <p><strong>Interpretation</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Risk R2 is <strong>most sensitive to Lagrådet yttrande content</strong>. The expected posterior after strict yttrande drops R2 by 4 points; silent yttrande raises R2 by 4 points. This makes the Lagrådet yttrande the single most consequential upcoming monitoring indicator — it can move a risk by ± 33% of its scale in a single trigger.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     R1["R1 Russian hybrid&#x3C;br/>16/25"]
     R2["R2 KU33 narrow interp&#x3C;br/>12/25"]
@@ -2931,7 +2931,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a
 <li><strong>R3 and R4 co-vary</strong>: US tribunal non-cooperation directly extends the compensation-commission timeline</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2968,7 +2968,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk Tier</th><th align="center">Score Band</th><th align="center">ALARP Status</th><th>Action Requirement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Critical (red)</strong></td><td align="center">16–25</td><td align="center">❌ UNACCEPTABLE without treatment</td><td>Immediate mitigation plan; executive review; published watch-list</td></tr><tr><td><strong>High (orange)</strong></td><td align="center">12–15</td><td align="center">⚠️ ALARP — treatment required</td><td>Documented mitigation; Bayesian update cadence defined</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Medium (yellow)</strong></td><td align="center">7–11</td><td align="center">🟡 ALARP — monitor</td><td>Owner assigned; quarterly review</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Low (green)</strong></td><td align="center">1–6</td><td align="center">✅ Accept</td><td>Monitor through standard bulletins</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-applied-to-this-run">Applied to this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-applied-to-this-run"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-applied-to-this-run">Applied to this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-applied-to-this-run"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3048,7 +3048,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-applied-to-this-run">Applied to this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Treatment Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1 Russian hybrid</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">🔴 Critical</td><td>SÄPO / MSB active posture; partnership with Nordic/Baltic services; ALARP reached with active mitigation</td></tr><tr><td>R2 KU33 narrow interpretation</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO remissvar; strict-interpretation legislative-record lobbying</td></tr><tr><td>R3 US non-cooperation tribunal</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>EU coalition-building; UK + Nordic engagement; diplomatic insurance</td></tr><tr><td>R5 KU33 campaign weaponisation</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>Government narrative discipline; Nordic-comparison framing preparation</td></tr><tr><td>R11 Register IT delivery delay</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">🟠 High</td><td>Lantmäteriet procurement oversight; Riksrevisionen audit scheduling</td></tr><tr><td>R7 RSF-index downgrade</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">🟡 Medium</td><td>Monitor; early-indicator reporting</td></tr><tr><td>R4 Reparations timeline slip</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">🟡 Medium</td><td>Institutional-continuity investment</td></tr><tr><td>R8 Russian asset retaliation</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">🟡 Medium</td><td>Swedish business continuity planning</td></tr><tr><td>R9 Register cyber-incident</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td><td>MSB baseline controls</td></tr><tr><td>R6 Reparations fatigue</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td><td>Standard political messaging</td></tr><tr><td>R10 SD Ukraine realignment</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">🟢 Low</td><td>Standard political monitoring</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-velocity-rate-of-change">🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-velocity-rate-of-change"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-velocity-rate-of-change">🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-velocity-rate-of-change"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3100,7 +3100,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-velocity-rate-of-change">🚀 Risk Velocity (Rate of Change)<a
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3144,9 +3144,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SWOT-ID</strong></td><td>SWT-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Scope</strong></td><td>Primary: Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33). Secondary: Ukraine Accountability Package (HD03231 + HD03232). Tertiary: Housing/AML (HD01CU27 + HD01CU28)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reference Period</strong></td><td>2025/26 Riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-realtime-monitor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code>, <code>get_propositioner</code>, <code>search_regering</code>, <code>search_dokument</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>political-swot-framework v3.0 (TOWS interference applied)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope">🏛️ Section 1 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (PRIMARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope">🏛️ Section 1 — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (PRIMARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--constitutional-press-freedom-reforms-primary-scope"></a></h3>
 <p>Scope: HD01KU32 (media accessibility amendment to TF + YGL) and HD01KU33 (removal of "allmän handling" status from digital material seized at husrannsakan). First reading only; second reading required post-2026 election for entry into force (proposed 2027-01-01).</p>
-<h3 id="rm--strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position">✅ Strengths — Government &#x26; Constitutional Framework Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position">✅ Strengths — Government &#x26; Constitutional Framework Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3201,7 +3201,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--strengths--government--constitutional-framework-position">✅ Streng
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id / source)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>KU secured cross-party support for <strong>first reading</strong> of two grundlag amendments — politically rare achievement</td><td>KU committee record; HD01KU32, HD01KU33 betänkanden</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>KU32 discharges a clear <strong>EU legal obligation</strong> (Accessibility Act 2019/882, in force since June 2025) — forecloses infringement-proceeding risk</td><td>HD01KU32 betänkande; EAA 2019/882</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>KU33 solves a <strong>concrete investigative problem</strong> — premature disclosure of seized digital material was compromising ongoing criminal investigations (gäng-/organised-crime cases)</td><td>HD01KU33 rationale; police operational experience</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Narrow carve-out design — "allmän handling" status retained when material is formally incorporated as evidence — provides <strong>textual safeguard</strong></td><td>HD01KU33 text</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Disability-rights framing (KU32) unifies M/KD/L/C/MP/L and neutralises opposition</td><td>KU32 committee support pattern</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks">⚠️ Weaknesses — Democratic-Infrastructure Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks">⚠️ Weaknesses — Democratic-Infrastructure Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3256,7 +3256,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-weaknesses--democratic-infrastructure-risks">⚠️ Weaknesses 
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing</strong> of TF's offentlighetsprincip in the digital-evidence sphere — compresses a 260-year-old transparency guarantee (TF 1766)</td><td>TF 1766 text; KU33 betänkande comparison; press-freedom literature</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Definition of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" is <strong>interpretively fragile</strong> — a future government interpreting narrowly could systematically shield police operations from insyn</td><td>HD01KU33 text; förvaltningsrätt interpretation risk</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>KU32 establishes <strong>precedent</strong> that EU obligations can justify ordinary-law intrusion into grundlag sphere — template for future grundlag compression (digital services, platform regulation)</td><td>HD01KU32 structural change; EAA implementation pattern</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Timing places constitutional press-freedom debate <strong>inside 2026 campaign</strong> — politicising grundlag in a way previous amendments were shielded from</td><td>8 kap. 14 § RF two-reading rule; election cycle</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>Lagrådet review still pending at publication — constitutional craftsmanship not yet independently vetted</td><td>Lagrådet process</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--opportunities--democratic-upside">🚀 Opportunities — Democratic Upside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities--democratic-upside"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities--democratic-upside">🚀 Opportunities — Democratic Upside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities--democratic-upside"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3303,7 +3303,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--opportunities--democratic-upside">🚀 Opportunities — Democratic
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Sweden continues to <strong>modernise world's oldest press-freedom framework</strong> — balancing investigative integrity with transparency; could become model for other democracies facing digital-evidence dilemmas</td><td>TF 1766 text; comparative press-freedom research</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>KU32 improves real-world accessibility (e-books, streaming, e-commerce) for ~1.5M Swedes with disabilities — <strong>tangible human-rights delivery</strong></td><td>EAA 2019/882 impact assessments</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>Strengthened investigative integrity (KU33) → improved <strong>organised-crime prosecution</strong> outcomes; feeds government's gäng-agenda policy coherence</td><td>Gäng-agenda policy framework</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Second-reading moment after election = <strong>democratic stress-test</strong> — new Riksdag's democratic bona fides judged by how it handles KU33</td><td>8 kap. RF</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--threats--democratic-downside">🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats--democratic-downside"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats--democratic-downside">🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--democratic-downside"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3359,7 +3359,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--threats--democratic-downside">🔴 Threats — Democratic Downside<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td><strong>Chilling effect on investigative journalism</strong> — sources may fear material seized at husrannsakan becomes un-inspectable; possible source-protection erosion</td><td>SJF, Utgivarna press-freedom doctrine; historical journalist-source patterns</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td><strong>Campaign instrumentalisation</strong> of KU33 by opposition — V, MP, S-left may frame government as press-freedom revisionist; could harden into political polarisation</td><td>2026 valrörelse dynamics</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td><strong>International press-freedom index</strong> erosion signal — Reporters Without Borders and similar indices may downgrade Sweden's score based on TF amendment, weakening soft-power posture (especially vis-à-vis Ukraine-tribunal leadership rhetoric — see Cluster 2 tension)</td><td>RSF methodology; comparable index events</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td><strong>Slippery-slope</strong> grundlag compression: KU32's EU-obligation template + KU33's investigative-integrity template, combined, could be used to justify further TF/YGL narrowings on digital platforms, AI content moderation, or national-security grounds</td><td>Grundlag erosion pattern analysis</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td><strong>Second-reading failure</strong> if post-election Riksdag has V/MP-strengthened left majority — amendments fall, but government loses political capital</td><td>Opinion polling; mandate distribution scenarios</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded">📊 SWOT Quadrant Mapping — Constitutional Reforms (Color-Coded)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded">📊 SWOT Quadrant Mapping — Constitutional Reforms (Color-Coded)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["Political SWOT — Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms (HD01KU32 + HD01KU33) — LEAD"]
         direction TB
@@ -3415,7 +3415,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-mapping--constitutional-reforms-color-coded">📊 SWOT
     style T4N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T5N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster">🔀 TOWS Interference Matrix — Constitutional Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster">🔀 TOWS Interference Matrix — Constitutional Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3467,7 +3467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--constitutional-cluster">🔀 TOWS Interfer
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Cross-SWOT interference finding</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong> of the constitutional package is the interpretation of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" (S4 / W2). If Lagrådet and Riksdag's legislative history lock in a strict interpretation, KU33 functions as a narrow, proportionate reform and T1/T3/T4 largely dissipate. If the language is left loose, T1+T4 combine into a durable democratic-infrastructure threat. <strong>Recommendation</strong>: press-freedom NGOs and opposition parties should make a <strong>strict interpretive record</strong> the price of second-reading support.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm--cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine">🔗 Cross-Cluster Tension — Constitutional × Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine">🔗 Cross-Cluster Tension — Constitutional × Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3485,8 +3485,8 @@ <h3 id="rm--cross-cluster-tension--constitutional--ukraine">🔗 Cross-Cluster T
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tension</th><th>Description</th><th>Strategic Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Rhetorical coherence</strong></td><td>Government simultaneously championing HD03231 (aggression-tribunal — implicitly valorises press freedom, journalists documenting war crimes) while narrowing TF via HD01KU33</td><td>Opposition parties can <strong>weaponise the inconsistency</strong>: "Sweden defends press freedom abroad while compressing it at home." Government counter: KU33 is narrow and investigation-specific, not a press-freedom retreat.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope">🌍 Section 2 — Ukraine Accountability Package (SECONDARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope">🌍 Section 2 — Ukraine Accountability Package (SECONDARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--ukraine-accountability-package-secondary-scope"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3528,7 +3528,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Sweden <strong>founding member</strong> of first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg (HD03231)</td><td>HD03231; Stenergard press release</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Cross-party Riksdag consensus (all 8 parties historically supported Ukraine measures since 2022)</td><td>Ukrainepaket voting record 2022-2025</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td><strong>No direct Swedish fiscal burden</strong> for reparations — funded from Russian immobilised assets (~EUR 260B; EUR 191B at Euroclear)</td><td>HD03232; G7 Ukraine Loan</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Sweden's post-NATO (March 2024) norm-entrepreneurship credentials reinforced</td><td>HD03231; NATO accession context</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3563,7 +3563,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>Enforcement depends on non-member cooperation (US, China, Russia not expected to join)</td><td>ICC precedent; US historical reluctance</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Reparations timeline may span decades (Iraq UNCC: 31 years, $52B)</td><td>UNCC historical record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>Sitting-HoS immunity gap in international law</td><td>Rome Statute 2017 amendment limits</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3591,7 +3591,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Closes Nuremberg gap in modern international criminal law</td><td>First aggression tribunal since 1945-46</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Reconstruction-governance voice (USD 486B+ damages per World Bank 2024)</td><td>HD03232; World Bank RDNA</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3627,7 +3627,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Russian hybrid warfare intensifies against Sweden as tribunal founder</td><td>Nordic sabotage events 2024; "unfriendly state" designation</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>US defection from asset immobilisation undermines enforcement (EUR 191B at Euroclear)</td><td>Transatlantic policy volatility</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Tribunal legitimacy erosion if boycotted by key states</td><td>ICC 124 states parties, major absences</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope">🏠 Section 3 — Housing Reforms (TERTIARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope">🏠 Section 3 — Housing Reforms (TERTIARY SCOPE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3667,7 +3667,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-3--housing-reforms-tertiary-scope">🏠 Section 3 — Housin
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>THR-ID</strong></td><td>THR-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>STRIDE (political-adapted) + <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scope</strong></td><td>Constitutional Reforms (LEAD) · Ukraine Accountability · Housing/AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus">🌳 Attack-Tree — Democratic-Infrastructure Threats (KU33 Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus">🌳 Attack-Tree — Democratic-Infrastructure Threats (KU33 Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Erode TF transparency&#x3C;br/>post KU33 entry into force"]
     A1["A1 Narrow interpretation&#x3C;br/>of formellt tillförd bevisning"]
@@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--democratic-infrastructure-threats-ku33-focus">🌳 Atta
     style A3 fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style A4 fill:#FFC107,color:#000000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-register">🎭 Threat Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-register">🎭 Threat Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-register">🎭 Threat Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Cluster</th><th>Actor</th><th>Method / TTP</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>Future gov / prosecutorial practice / förvaltningsrätt</td><td>Interpretation drift; administrative discretion without legislative-history anchor</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Campaign weaponisation of KU33</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>V, MP, S-left; journalism NGOs</td><td>Framing amendment as press-freedom regression; 2026 valrörelse talking points</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Slippery-slope via KU32 EU-obligation template</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>Future legislation (digital platforms, AI, national security)</td><td>Re-use of EU-obligation → grundlag-compression template</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Source-chilling effect on investigative journalism</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>Structural / systemic</td><td>Source avoidance of physical evidence handover; reduced tips to journalists</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>Russian diplomatic pressure</strong> (post-HD03231/232)</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>RF MFA</td><td>Official protests, diplomatic notes; status quo pattern since 2022</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 MONITOR</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid warfare</strong> (cyber, disinformation, sabotage)</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>GRU, SVR, FSB</td><td>Cyber ops on SE gov infra; disinformation in valrörelse; Nordic infrastructure sabotage</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal legal counter-challenges</strong></td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>Russia + sympathetic fora</td><td>Jurisdictional challenges; forum shopping</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Ukraine fatigue narrative</strong></td><td align="center">Ukraine</td><td>Domestic populist actors</td><td>Framing continued engagement as economically costly</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MONITOR</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T9</strong></td><td><strong>Property-register cyber attack</strong> (post-Jan 2027)</td><td align="center">Housing</td><td>State + criminal actors</td><td>Data exfiltration from Lantmäteriet; ransomware</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T10</strong></td><td><strong>International press-freedom index downgrade</strong></td><td align="center">Constitutional</td><td>RSF, Freedom House</td><td>Downgrade of Sweden post-TF amendment; reputational blowback for UD press-freedom diplomacy</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-mapping-political-adaptation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-mapping-political-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-mapping-political-adaptation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3907,33 +3907,33 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th align="center">Threat ID(s)</th><th>Political Translation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td align="center">T6</td><td>Disinformation campaigns impersonating Swedish authorities during valrörelse</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td align="center">T1, T3</td><td>Interpretive tampering with KU33 test; legal-template tampering via KU32 precedent</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td align="center">T7</td><td>Russia repudiates tribunal jurisdiction</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation Disclosure</td><td align="center">T4, T9</td><td>Chilling effect suppresses legitimate disclosure; cyber attacks force illegitimate disclosure</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td align="center">T6, T9</td><td>Cyber ops against gov infrastructure; register DoS</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of Privilege</td><td align="center">T1, T3</td><td>Administrative actors obtain grundlag-level discretion by interpretive creep</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority-Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority">T1 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority-Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority">T1 — KU33 Narrow-Interpretation (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--ku33-narrow-interpretation-mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Pre-vote</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande must explicitly scope "formellt tillförd bevisning" test</li>
 <li><strong>Pre-vote</strong>: KU committee record should document legislator intent (strict interpretation)</li>
 <li><strong>Post-vote</strong>: JO/JK annual reporting on KU33 application; NGO monitoring framework</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate">T2 — Campaign Weaponisation (MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate">T2 — Campaign Weaponisation (MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--campaign-weaponisation-mitigate"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Cross-party leadership statements on KU33 (avoid partisan capture)</li>
 <li>Early NGO engagement (SJF, Utgivarna, TU) to co-design interpretive guardrails</li>
 <li>Government transparency commitment: annual published summary of KU33 applications</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority">T6 — Russian Hybrid (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority">T6 — Russian Hybrid (MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--russian-hybrid-mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SÄPO reinforced posture during valrörelse</li>
 <li>NCSC continuous monitoring of gov infrastructure</li>
 <li>NATO CCDCOE and StratCom COE coordination</li>
 <li>MSB public-awareness campaign on information-operation tactics</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active">T3 / T10 — Slippery-Slope + Index Downgrade (ACTIVE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active">T3 / T10 — Slippery-Slope + Index Downgrade (ACTIVE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--t10--slippery-slope--index-downgrade-active"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>UD press-freedom diplomacy pre-brief RSF/Freedom House on amendment scope</li>
 <li>Constitutional scholars' commentary positioned for international audiences</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">🧪 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-severity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-severity-matrix">🧪 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Threat Severity — Realtime 1434
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -3953,7 +3953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">🧪 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-
     T9-Register-Cyber: [0.70, 0.30]
     T10-Index-Downgrade: [0.55, 0.50]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6">🎯 Cyber-Kill-Chain Adaptation — Hybrid-Warfare Scenario (T6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6">🎯 Cyber-Kill-Chain Adaptation — Hybrid-Warfare Scenario (T6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Adapting the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain (Hutchins et al. 2011) to Russian hybrid-warfare targeting of Sweden after HD03231 founding-member status.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3975,7 +3975,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--hybrid-warfare-scenario-t6">🎯 Cyber-
     style IN fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style CC fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style AC fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb">Kill-Chain Specific Indicators (for SÄPO / MSB)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb">Kill-Chain Specific Indicators (for SÄPO / MSB)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4032,7 +4032,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-kill-chain-specific-indicators-for-säpo--msb">Kill-Chain Specific In
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Observable</th><th>Sensor</th><th align="center">Detection Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Reconnaissance</td><td>OSINT scraping of Riksdag / UD / SÄPO personnel; social-engineering LinkedIn contacts</td><td>MSB CERT; SÄPO</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>2. Weaponisation</td><td>Fake-document kit prepared; deepfake/audio tooling activity</td><td>Signals intel</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>3. Delivery</td><td>Spear-phishing against key officials; subsea-cable anomalies; suspicious vessel tracking; bot-network seeding</td><td>MSB, Kustbevakningen, MUST</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>4. Exploitation</td><td>Account compromise; narrative traction (Twitter/X, TikTok)</td><td>Internal IR teams; civil-society monitors</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>5. Installation</td><td>Persistent access (implants, dormant accounts); long-term troll-network warm-up</td><td>SÄPO, FRA</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>6. C2</td><td>Beaconing patterns; coordinated amplification campaigns</td><td>FRA, Graphika / civil-society</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>7. Actions</td><td>DoS on Swedish infrastructure; public-opinion shift; specific policy reversal attempts</td><td>Broad sensor set</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Defence posture</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The defensive goal is interception <strong>before stage 5</strong> (Installation). Post-Installation displacement costs are an order of magnitude higher than pre-Installation prevention.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid">🔺 Diamond Model — Adversary Profile (T6 Russian Hybrid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid">🔺 Diamond Model — Adversary Profile (T6 Russian Hybrid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Diamond["Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Threat Actor"]
         ADV["🎭 ADVERSARY&#x3C;br/>GRU Unit 26165 (APT28)&#x3C;br/>GRU Unit 74455 (Sandworm)&#x3C;br/>FSB Centre 18&#x3C;br/>PMC Wagner-descendent influence ops&#x3C;br/>Internet Research Agency successor entities"]
@@ -4051,7 +4051,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diamond-model--adversary-profile-t6-russian-hybrid">🔺 Diamond Mod
     style VIC fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH — mapping consistent with SÄPO annual assessments (2023–25) and FOI / Nordic-Baltic intelligence-sharing findings.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables">🧰 MITRE-Style TTP Library (Hybrid-Warfare Observables)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables">🧰 MITRE-Style TTP Library (Hybrid-Warfare Observables)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4150,7 +4150,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--mitre-style-ttp-library-hybrid-warfare-observables">🧰 MITRE-Style
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP Code</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Observable in Sweden (2023–25 baseline)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TA-01</td><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Target-list harvesting (LinkedIn, registries)</td><td>Observed — officials, journalists, military</td></tr><tr><td>TA-02</td><td>Resource Development</td><td>Shell-company acquisitions</td><td>Documented (Fastighetsmäklarinspektionen cases)</td></tr><tr><td>TA-03</td><td>Initial Access</td><td>Spear-phishing</td><td>Consistently observed; 2024 SÄPO report</td></tr><tr><td>TA-04</td><td>Persistence</td><td>Dormant accounts, long-cycle troll operators</td><td>Graphika / EUvsDisinfo documentation</td></tr><tr><td>TA-05</td><td>Defense Evasion</td><td>Proxy-state laundering of attribution</td><td>Standard tradecraft</td></tr><tr><td>TA-06</td><td>Credential Access</td><td>Password spraying, credential stuffing</td><td>Routine observation</td></tr><tr><td>TA-07</td><td>Discovery</td><td>Internal lateral mapping post-compromise</td><td>Routine in compromised-account investigations</td></tr><tr><td>TA-08</td><td>Lateral Movement</td><td>Email-chain compromise</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td>TA-09</td><td>Collection</td><td>Document exfiltration</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td>TA-10</td><td>C2</td><td>Telegram channels, alternative platforms</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td>TA-11</td><td>Exfiltration</td><td>Dead drops via cloud services</td><td>Observed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TA-12</strong></td><td><strong>Impact — Narrative</strong></td><td><strong>Coordinated disinformation campaigns</strong></td><td><strong>Observed and escalating 2022→2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>TA-13</strong></td><td><strong>Impact — Physical</strong></td><td><strong>Cable-cutting, GPS spoofing, migration instrumentalisation</strong></td><td><strong>Elevated 2023–24</strong></td></tr><tr><td>TA-14</td><td>Impact — Legal</td><td>SLAPP / GDPR-abuse litigation</td><td>Observed in Nordic context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Cross-reference</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Compare with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Diplomatic Response Patterns — Estonia (2022–), Finland (2023–), Netherlands (sustained). Sweden's expected pattern interpolates between Finland and Netherlands severity.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-defensive-recommendations-prioritised">🛡️ Defensive Recommendations (Prioritised)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-defensive-recommendations-prioritised"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-defensive-recommendations-prioritised">🛡️ Defensive Recommendations (Prioritised)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-defensive-recommendations-prioritised"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4209,7 +4209,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-defensive-recommendations-prioritised">🛡️ Defensive Recommen
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27-cu28">HD01CU27-CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27-cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4249,7 +4249,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27-cu28">HD01CU27-CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok IDs</strong></td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 (Civilutskottet betänkanden 2025/26:CU27 &#x26; CU28)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Civilutskottet (CU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Area</strong></td><td>Housing / Property Law / Anti-Money-Laundering (AML)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>CU28: 5.8 · CU27: 5.4 · <strong>DIW</strong> CU28 ×1.00 = 5.80 · CU27 ×1.05 = 5.67</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in this run</strong></td><td>🏠 Secondary (tertiary within dossier)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>🟠 <strong>L2 Strategic</strong> (upgraded from L1 in reference-grade iteration)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture">1. Political Significance — A Coherent Housing-Market Integrity + Organised-Crime Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture">1. Political Significance — A Coherent Housing-Market Integrity + Organised-Crime Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organised-crime-architecture"></a></h3>
 <p>These two betänkanden are <strong>individually tertiary</strong> in this run's DIW ranking but <strong>collectively important</strong> because they institutionalise a <strong>housing-market-integrity + anti-money-laundering</strong> architecture that:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Closes a known loophole</strong> in the <em>ombildning</em> (rental → bostadsrätt conversion) process (CU27)</li>
@@ -4261,8 +4261,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--a-coherent-housing-market-integrity--organi
 <p><strong>Cross-cluster insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: CU27 + CU28 form a <em>rhetorical unit</em> with KU33 — all three invoke organised-crime integrity. Opposition actors (V, MP, civil-liberties NGOs) can exploit this coupling by framing the trio as <strong>"coordinated surveillance-adjacent creep"</strong>. Government actors conversely frame it as <strong>"coherent institutional modernisation"</strong>. Both framings are available; 2026 valrörelse will choose.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register">2. HD01CU28 — National Condominium Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-21-mechanism">2.1 Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-mechanism"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register">2. HD01CU28 — National Condominium Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd01cu28--national-condominium-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-mechanism">2.1 Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-mechanism"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Creates a <strong>new national register of all bostadsrätter</strong> (cooperative apartments/condominiums)</li>
 <li>Register contains:
@@ -4277,7 +4277,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-mechanism">2.1 Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-
 <li><strong>Operator</strong>: Lantmäteriet</li>
 <li><strong>Effective dates</strong>: Register setup <strong>Jan 1 2027</strong>; other operational provisions per government decision</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-22-context-and-scale-high">2.2 Context and Scale <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-context-and-scale-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-context-and-scale-high">2.2 Context and Scale <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-context-and-scale-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>≈ <strong>2 million bostadsrätter</strong> — one of Sweden's most common housing forms</li>
 <li>Absence of unified register has been repeatedly criticised since 2010s:
@@ -4290,7 +4290,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-22-context-and-scale-high">2.2 Context and Scale <code>[HIGH]</code><
 <li>Financial sector (SEB, Swedbank, Handelsbanken, SBAB, Nordea) has lobbied for register since mid-2010s</li>
 <li>SOU-ledda utredning underpinning this reform: estimate SOU 2023/24 (precise reference pending public availability)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4333,8 +4333,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-23-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">2.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Finding</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Legal</strong></td><td>Straightforward ordinary-law reform; no grundlag engagement; integrates into existing fastighetsregister doctrine</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral</strong></td><td>Low salience but broad consumer-positive framing; cross-party support expected</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic</strong></td><td>Cleaner credit market; reduced collateral risk; ≈ SEK 100–300M annual pledge-registration fees (estimated); Lantmäteriet IT procurement cost</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security</strong></td><td>Closes AML blind spot; contributes to organised-crime architecture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data-protection</strong></td><td>Centralised register of sensitive financial data → cyber-target; see R9 and T9</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Implementation</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet IT procurement timeline: tight for Jan 2027 target</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform">3. HD01CU27 — Identity Requirements + Ombildning Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande">3.1 Mechanism — Two Reforms in One Betänkande<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform">3. HD01CU27 — Identity Requirements + Ombildning Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd01cu27--identity-requirements--ombildning-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande">3.1 Mechanism — Two Reforms in One Betänkande<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Reform 1 — Identity Requirements for Lagfart (Property Title Transfer)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Physical persons</strong>: Must supply <strong>personnummer</strong> or <strong>samordningsnummer</strong> when applying for lagfart</li>
@@ -4348,7 +4348,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-31-mechanism--two-reforms-in-one-betänkande">3.1 Mechanism — Two R
 <li><strong>New rule</strong>: Tenant must have been <strong>folkbokförd at the address for ≥ 6 months</strong> to count in the 2/3 calculation</li>
 <li><strong>Anti-fraud rationale</strong>: Closes the "ghost-tenant" loophole where landlords registered cooperative actors at short-notice to manufacture conversion majorities</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-32-context-high">3.2 Context <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-context-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-32-context-high">3.2 Context <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-context-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Ombildning remains politically sensitive — particularly in Stockholm (2010s wave), Göteborg, Malmö</li>
 <li>Hyresgästföreningen has long documented loophole exploitation</li>
@@ -4356,7 +4356,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-32-context-high">3.2 Context <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidd
 <li>Skatteverket Hewlett + SÄPO: property has been a vector for organised-crime laundering — Bitcoin-era enforcement gap</li>
 <li>EU AMLD6 (6th Anti-Money-Laundering Directive) compliance trajectory</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4399,7 +4399,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-33-six-lens-analysis-abbreviated">3.3 Six-Lens Analysis (Abbreviated)
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Finding</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Legal</strong></td><td>Ordinary-law reform; straightforward</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral</strong></td><td>Hyresgästföreningen support; Fastighetsägarna / landlord associations likely neutral-to-opposed; tenant-protection framing positive</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic</strong></td><td>Fewer ombildning conversions on the margin → slight rental-market stabilisation</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Privacy</strong></td><td>Personnummer centralisation increases re-identification risk; standard Swedish doctrine (low sensitivity domestically)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>AML / crime</strong></td><td>Closes known laundering channel</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Implementation</strong></td><td>July 1 2026 deadline is tight; Lantmäteriet administrative burden</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid">4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid">4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["SWOT — CU27 + CU28 Housing / AML Architecture"]
         direction TB
@@ -4451,7 +4451,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-combined-swot-mermaid">4. Combined SWOT (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-h
     style T3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-beneficiary-analysis">5. Beneficiary Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-beneficiary-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-beneficiary-analysis">5. Beneficiary Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-beneficiary-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title "Direct Beneficiaries — CU27 + CU28 Housing/AML"
     "Homebuyers / borrowers" : 30
     "Banks / mortgage lenders" : 25
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-beneficiary-analysis">5. Beneficiary Analysis<a class="" aria-hidde
     "Existing tenants (anti-ombildning-fraud)" : 15
     "Lantmäteriet + Skatteverket" : 10</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">6. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">6. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4593,7 +4593,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">6. Stakeholder Positions — N
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">CU27</th><th align="center">CU28</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Erik Slottner (KD, Civil Affairs)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Government champion</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Crime-fighting alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>AML compliance</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lantmäteriet (Director-General)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4 (execution stress)</td><td>Implementation responsibility</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Skatteverket</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Operational tool</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polismyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>AML enforcement benefit</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finansinspektionen</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>AML supervision</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SEB / Swedbank / Handelsbanken / SBAB / Nordea</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Long-standing sector lobby</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mäklarsamfundet</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Market-transparency benefit</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fastighetsmäklarinspektionen (FMI)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Regulatory clarity</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Hyresgästföreningen</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +2</td><td>Ombildning loophole closure</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fastighetsägarna</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +1</td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Landlord-association mixed</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil-liberties orgs (V-aligned)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 −1</td><td align="center">🟡 −2</td><td>Privacy-centralisation concerns</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Consumer-protection alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td align="center">🟡 +1</td><td>Anti-ombildning-fraud positive; privacy concerns on register</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Transparency positive</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Law-and-order alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-evidence-table">7. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-evidence-table">7. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4678,7 +4678,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-evidence-table">7. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>CU proposes national register for all ≈2M bostadsrätter</td><td>HD01CU28 betänkande</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>Register includes property, owner, association, and pledge data</td><td>HD01CU28 summary</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>Register operator Lantmäteriet</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Operational</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>Register effective Jan 1 2027</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Timeline</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>Personnummer / samordningsnummer required for lagfart</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (AML)</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>Organisationsnummer required for legal entities</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>6-month folkbokföring requirement for ombildning majority count</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (loophole)</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>CU27 effective July 1 2026</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Timeline</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>Banking sector multi-year advocacy for register</td><td>Sector public statements 2015–2024</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Support</td></tr><tr><td>E10</td><td>EU AMLD6 alignment</td><td>Policy context</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">EU compliance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch">8. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch">8. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4742,7 +4742,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-indicator-library-what-to-watch">8. Indicator Library (What to Watc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I1</td><td>CU27 kammarvote</td><td>Committee → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I2</td><td>CU28 kammarvote</td><td>Committee → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I3</td><td>Lantmäteriet register IT procurement announcement</td><td>Upphandling</td><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td align="center">Q3–Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I4</td><td>Hyresgästföreningen first documented CU27 effect case</td><td>Public statement</td><td>HGF</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I5</td><td>First AML prosecution citing CU27</td><td>Prosecution announcement</td><td>Åklagarmyndigheten</td><td align="center">H2 2026+</td></tr><tr><td>I6</td><td>Register cyber-incident (R9/T9 realisation)</td><td>SÄPO / MSB bulletin</td><td>—</td><td align="center">Post Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td>I7</td><td>Opposition reframing ("surveillance creep")</td><td>Political statements</td><td>V, MP, civil-liberties NGOs</td><td align="center">Campaign 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment">9. Implementation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment">9. Implementation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4786,7 +4786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-implementation-risk-assessment">9. Implementation Risk Assessment<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Mitigation Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lantmäteriet IT delivery delay</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td>Lantmäteriet, Finansdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td>Register data-security incident</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">8</td><td>Lantmäteriet, MSB</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative burden on Bostadsrättsföreningar</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Boverket, consumer guidance</td></tr><tr><td>Privacy / surveillance-creep narrative success</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Government communications</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>(Cross-ref: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R9 · R11)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Policy lineage</strong>: Gäng-agenda (Prop 2025/26:100) · HD03246 (juvenile-crime, covered in realtime-0029 earlier today) · EU AMLD6</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal context</strong>: Spring budget 2026 (HD0399)</li>
@@ -4796,7 +4796,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Depth</strong>: L2 Strategic · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32-ku33">HD01KU32-KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32-ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4836,13 +4836,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32-ku33">HD01KU32-KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Betänkande 2025/26:KU32 — <em>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — <em>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading</strong></td><td><strong>First reading (vilande)</strong> under 8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Effective (if adopted)</strong></td><td>Proposed 2027-01-01, conditional on second reading in post-2026-election Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>7/10 each · <strong>DIW Weighted</strong>: 9.8 (KU33) / 8.25 (KU32)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> (KU33) · 📜 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> (KU32)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story">1. Political Significance — Why These Are the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story">1. Political Significance — Why These Are the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-these-are-the-lead-story"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's <strong>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF)</strong> is the world's <strong>oldest freedom-of-the-press law</strong> (1766 — ten years before the United States Declaration of Independence, two decades before the U.S. First Amendment, and 83 years before France's 1849 press law). It is a <strong>grundlag</strong> — one of four constitutional laws of the realm. The <strong>Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL, 1991)</strong> extends equivalent protections to modern broadcast and digital media.</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Two-reading requirement (8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen)</strong>: A grundlag amendment requires <strong>two identical votes by two separately-elected Riksdags</strong>, with at least one <strong>general election</strong> between them. The first reading (today) is called the <em>vilande beslut</em> — it "rests" until the post-election Riksdag either ratifies or rejects.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This mechanism is a deliberate constitutional brake: it forces every grundlag amendment to survive a democratic mandate change. The <strong>2026 election campaign will therefore be partly a referendum on KU32 and KU33.</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation">HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility (EU EAA grundlag accommodation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation">HD01KU32 — Media Accessibility (EU EAA grundlag accommodation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mechanism</strong>: Amends TF and YGL to permit tillgänglighetskrav (accessibility requirements) to be imposed via <strong>ordinary law</strong> on products/services that fall within the grundlag-protected sphere.</li>
 <li><strong>Three operative elements</strong>:
@@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32--media-accessibility-eu-eaa-grundlag-accommodation">HD01KU32
 <li><strong>EU driver</strong>: <strong>European Accessibility Act (Directive 2019/882)</strong> — full application since June 2025</li>
 <li><strong>Beneficiary scale</strong>: ~1.5 million Swedes with disabilities (Myndigheten för delaktighet baseline)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing">HD01KU33 — Search/Seizure Digital Evidence (TF transparency narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing">HD01KU33 — Search/Seizure Digital Evidence (TF transparency narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mechanism</strong>: Amends TF so that <strong>digital recordings seized, copied, or taken over during husrannsakan</strong> (criminal search) are <strong>no longer "allmän handling"</strong> — i.e., fall outside offentlighetsprincipen.</li>
 <li><strong>Exception</strong>: If seized material is <strong>formally incorporated as evidence</strong> (<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>) in the investigation, it <strong>retains "allmän handling"</strong> status.</li>
@@ -4863,7 +4863,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33--searchseizure-digital-evidence-tf-transparency-narrowing">H
 <li><strong>Constitutional significance</strong>: This is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF's offentlighetsprincip</strong> in the digital-evidence domain in years. Although scoped to a specific context (seized digital material), it modifies a text dating to <strong>1766</strong>.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid">2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid">2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A["📅 2026-04-17&#x3C;br/>KU Committee Report&#x3C;br/>(Betänkande 2025/26:KU32/KU33)"] --> B{"Kammarvote&#x3C;br/>(vilande beslut)&#x3C;br/>May-June 2026"}
     B -->|"Passes"| C["🗳️ September 2026&#x3C;br/>General Election&#x3C;br/>(Constitutional brake)"]
@@ -4884,7 +4884,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-constitutional-timeline-mermaid">2. Constitutional Timeline (Mermai
     style I fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style J fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments">3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments">3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4922,7 +4922,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-detailed-swot-both-amendments">3. Detailed SWOT (Both Amendments)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD01KU32 (Accessibility)</th><th>HD01KU33 (Search/Seizure)</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong></td><td>Discharges binding EU obligation (EAA 2019/882); unifies coalition; disability-rights delivery</td><td>Solves real investigative-integrity problem in gäng-era prosecutions; narrow carve-out preserves transparency when material becomes evidence</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong></td><td>Establishes precedent that EU obligations can expand ordinary-law intrusion into grundlag sphere</td><td>Interpretive boundary of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" underspecified; narrow future interpretation could systemically shield police operations from offentlighetsprincipen</td><td align="center">HIGH / MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong></td><td>Modernises grundlag for digital accessibility without triggering broader overhaul; Nordic benchmark leadership</td><td>Strengthens investigative output → gäng-agenda policy coherence; paired with CU27/CU28 AML architecture</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong></td><td>Precedent risk: future legislation cites KU32's EU-obligation template to narrow TF/YGL in other digital domains (platform regulation, AI content, national security)</td><td>Campaign weaponisation (V/MP, press-freedom NGOs, possibly S); source-chilling effect on investigative journalism; RSF/Freedom House index downgrade</td><td align="center">MEDIUM / HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier">4. "Formellt tillförd bevisning" — The Critical Interpretive Frontier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier">4. "Formellt tillförd bevisning" — The Critical Interpretive Frontier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier"></a></h3>
 <p>The <strong>single most important question</strong> in KU33 is how Swedish legal institutions will interpret <em>"formellt tillförd bevisning"</em> ("formally incorporated as evidence"). Three interpretive postures are plausible:</p>
 
 
@@ -4956,7 +4956,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-formellt-tillförd-bevisning--the-critical-interpretive-frontier">4
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Posture</th><th>Description</th><th>Effect</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strict</strong> (press-friendly)</td><td>Material considered "incorporated" once referred to in any protokoll/stämningsansökan/tjänsteanteckning</td><td>Narrow carve-out; most material retains allmän handling status relatively quickly</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Intermediate</strong></td><td>Material incorporated upon formal inclusion in förundersökningsprotokoll</td><td>Substantial volume excluded during multi-year investigations</td><td align="center">HIGH (default)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Narrow</strong> (police-friendly)</td><td>Material incorporated only upon inclusion in stämningsansökan or as bevis i rättegång</td><td>Large volumes of seized digital material permanently outside offentlighetsprincipen</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Recommendation (for press-freedom advocates)</strong>: Focus remissvar and Lagrådet engagement on <strong>locking a strict or intermediate interpretation into legislative history</strong>. This is the leverage point that transforms KU33 from "press-freedom regression" to "narrow, proportionate reform."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors">5. Stakeholder Perspectives (Named Actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors">5. Stakeholder Perspectives (Named Actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5042,7 +5042,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-stakeholder-perspectives-named-actors">5. Stakeholder Perspectives
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">HD01KU32</th><th align="center">HD01KU33</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>KU (proposing)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td>Committee record</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gov ministers</strong> — Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice)</td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Strongly supports</strong> (prosecution rationale)</td><td>Ministerial portfolio</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🟡 Watches press-freedom impact</td><td>L liberal-identity risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> — Nooshi Dadgostar (party leader)</td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🔴 Opposes (expected)</td><td>V press-freedom doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> — Daniel Helldén (språkrör)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly supports</td><td align="center">🔴 Opposes (expected)</td><td>Grundlag-protection doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong> — Magdalena Andersson (party leader)</td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🟡 <strong>Divided</strong> — position critical</td><td>S press-freedom historical vs law-and-order wing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Journalistförbundet (SJF)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 Supports</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Strong concern</strong></td><td>Professional press-freedom mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TU / Utgivarna</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>Strong concern</strong></td><td>Publisher mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polismyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Strongly supports</strong></td><td>Operational beneficiary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Åklagarmyndigheten</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly supports</td><td>Prosecution effectiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DHR / FUB / SRF</strong> (disability NGOs)</td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Enthusiastically supports</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral</td><td>KU32 accessibility gain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td align="center">Pending</td><td align="center">Pending</td><td>Yttrande expected Q2 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels">6. Evidence Table (with Confidence Labels)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels">6. Evidence Table (with Confidence Labels)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5120,7 +5120,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-evidence-table-with-confidence-labels">6. Evidence Table (with Conf
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>KU proposes first reading (vilande) of two grundlag amendments</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33 betänkanden</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>TF / YGL changes require two votes across a general election</td><td>8 kap. 14 § Regeringsformen</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Context</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>KU33 removes allmän handling status from digital material seized at husrannsakan</td><td>HD01KU33 summary text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (press freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>KU33 preserves allmän handling status when material is formellt tillförd bevisning</td><td>HD01KU33 summary text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (mitigation)</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>KU32 enables accessibility requirements via ordinary law on e-books, e-handel, broadcasters</td><td>HD01KU32 summary text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>EAA 2019/882 is the EU obligation driver for KU32</td><td>HD01KU32 rationale; EAA text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>Proposed entry-into-force 2027-01-01 conditional on post-2026-election ratification</td><td>Both betänkanden</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Timeline</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>Sweden's TF dates to 1766 — world's oldest press-freedom law</td><td>TF archival record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Framing</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande pending</td><td>Lagrådet process</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Risk signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates">7. Forward Indicators (With Triggers and Dates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates">7. Forward Indicators (With Triggers and Dates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5191,7 +5191,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-with-triggers-and-dates">7. Forward Indicators (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande</strong> published</td><td>Formal delivery</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>Kammarvote (vilande beslut)</td><td>KU → kammaren schedule</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">May-June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>Press-freedom NGO joint statement</td><td>Remissvar or public statement</td><td>SJF, TU, Utgivarna, PK</td><td align="center">Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>F4</td><td>S leadership definitive position on KU33</td><td>Andersson speech / partistämma</td><td>S</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>2026 valrörelse press-freedom salience</td><td>Media coverage tracking</td><td>—</td><td align="center">Aug-Sep 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td><strong>Post-election Riksdag composition</strong> — KU33 2nd-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten preliminary</td><td>Voters</td><td align="center">2026-09-13</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>Second reading in new Riksdag</td><td>Kammarvote</td><td>Next Riksdag</td><td align="center">Oct-Dec 2026</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td>Entry into force (or rejection)</td><td>Kungörelse</td><td>Gov + Riksdag</td><td align="center">2027-01-01</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-cross-references">8. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-cross-references">8. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Grundlag text</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/tryckfrihetsforordning-19491105_sfs-1949-105">Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF, 1766)</a> · <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/yttrandefrihetsgrundlag-19911469_sfs-1991-1469">Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL, 1991)</a> · 8 kap. 14 § <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/kungorelse-1974152-om-beslutad-ny-regeringsform_sfs-1974-152">Regeringsformen</a></li>
 <li><strong>EU driver</strong>: Directive 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act)</li>
@@ -5200,7 +5200,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-cross-references">8. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Methodologies</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md">political-swot-framework</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md">political-risk-methodology</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md">political-threat-framework</a></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes">9. International Comparison — Digital-Evidence Transparency Regimes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes">9. International Comparison — Digital-Evidence Transparency Regimes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5278,7 +5278,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-international-comparison--digital-evidence-transparency-regimes">9.
 </blockquote>
 <p>(Full comparative analysis: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>../comparative-international.md</code></a> §Section 1)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree">10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branching Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree">10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branching Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     LP["🟡 Lagrådet pending Q2 2026"]
     LP --> LS{"Yttrande content"}
@@ -5300,7 +5300,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-lagrådet-scenario-branching-tree">10. Lagrådet-Scenario Branchin
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Analysis Level</strong>: L3 (Intelligence) · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5352,9 +5352,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok ID</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td><em>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Department</strong></td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Responsible Minister</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) — Foreign Minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Countersigned by</strong></td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9/10</strong> · <strong>DIW ×0.95 = 8.55</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in this run</strong></td><td>🌍 Prominent Secondary (Co-prominent with HD03232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>🟠 <strong>L2+ Strategic</strong> (upgraded from L2 in reference-grade iteration)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment">1. Political Significance — Why This Is a Generational Norm-Entrepreneurship Moment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment">1. Political Significance — Why This Is a Generational Norm-Entrepreneurship Moment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--why-this-is-a-generational-norm-entrepreneurship-moment"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden formally proposes to become a <strong>founding member</strong> of the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> — the <strong>first criminal tribunal established since the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals (1945–1948) to prosecute the crime of aggression specifically</strong>. The tribunal will sit in <strong>The Hague</strong>, operate under the <strong>Council of Europe framework</strong> via an Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA), and have jurisdiction to prosecute the Russian political and military leadership responsible for the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-developments-since-invasion">Key developments since invasion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-developments-since-invasion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-developments-since-invasion">Key developments since invasion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-developments-since-invasion"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5406,21 +5406,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-developments-since-invasion">Key developments since invasion<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feb 24 2022</strong></td><td>Russia launches full-scale invasion</td><td>Trigger event</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nov 2022</strong></td><td>UNGA Resolution (A/RES/ES-11/5) on reparations and accountability</td><td>Foundation for HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Feb 2022 onward</strong></td><td>Sweden joins core working group on aggression tribunal</td><td>Foundational role</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dec 16 2025</strong></td><td>Hague Convention signed in The Hague with President Zelensky present</td><td>Treaty text finalised</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mar 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden among first states to sign letter of intent</td><td>Founding-member status locked</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Apr 16 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden tables HD03231 + HD03232 in Riksdag</td><td><strong>This document</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2–Q3 2026 (projected)</strong></td><td>Swedish kammarvote on both propositions</td><td>Constitutional authorisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026 or later</strong></td><td>Tribunal operations commence; first docket opens</td><td>Accountability delivery</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's verbatim statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's verbatim statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-verbatim-statement"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"Ryssland måste ställas till svars för sitt aggressionsbrott mot Ukraina. Annars riskerar vi en värld där anfallskrig lönar sig. Sverige tar nu nästa steg för att ansluta sig till en särskild tribunal för att åtala och döma ryska politiska och militära ledare för aggressionsbrottet, något som inte skett sedan Nürnbergrättegångarna."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p><strong>Analyst note</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>Nuremberg framing</strong> is politically deliberate — it unifies cross-party support (M, KD, L, C, SD, S, V, MP historically all aligned with anti-aggression posture), pre-empts SD-populist ambivalence (Nuremberg is rhetorically compatible with law-and-order conservatism), and positions Sweden as <strong>norm entrepreneur rather than security-dependent free-rider</strong>. This is Sweden's largest international-legal commitment since NATO accession (March 2024).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Ratification requires Riksdag approval under RF 10 kap. (treaty accession)</li>
 <li>EPA structure means Sweden contributes assessed dues under Council of Europe framework — no novel domestic-law needed</li>
 <li>Tribunal jurisdiction covers <strong>crime of aggression</strong> as defined in ICC Rome Statute Art. 8 <em>bis</em> (2017 Kampala amendments) — filling the gap where ICC's aggression jurisdiction excludes UNSC permanent-member nationals in most circumstances</li>
 <li><strong>Sitting-HoS immunity</strong> remains a frontier legal question — the SCSL precedent (Charles Taylor) and Rome Statute Art. 27 support piercing, but ICJ <em>Arrest Warrant</em> (2002, DRC v Belgium) established general HoS immunity under customary international law</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coalition position (M/KD/L + SD parliamentary support)</strong>: Strongly supportive</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition (S/V/MP)</strong>: S and MP strongly supportive; V historically sceptical of NATO framing but consistently pro-accountability since 2022</li>
@@ -5428,27 +5428,27 @@ <h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <co
 <li><strong>Centre (C)</strong>: Strongly supportive (European international-law tradition)</li>
 <li><strong>Projected cross-party consensus</strong>: ≈ <strong>349 MPs</strong> — near-universal</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's <strong>post-NATO (Mar 2024) norm-entrepreneurship credentials</strong> reinforced — this is the first major multilateral-law commitment since accession</li>
 <li>Complements the ICC: ICC covers war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide; Special Tribunal fills the <strong>aggression-crime gap</strong> unprosecutable under current ICC rules (Kampala limitations)</li>
 <li>Message to non-European aggressors (PRC strategic observers): aggression now has a dedicated accountability track even when UNSC is deadlocked</li>
 <li>Signals to Russia: <strong>no reset pathway</strong> — Swedish commitment is institutional, not policy-cyclical</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Direct precedent: <strong>Nuremberg IMT (1945–46)</strong> — 12 death sentences, 3 life sentences, 4 acquittals</li>
 <li>Closer structural model: <strong>Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL, 2002–13)</strong> — hybrid Council-of-Europe / state-accession design; convicted sitting-era HoS (Charles Taylor)</li>
 <li>Parallel structural model: <strong>Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL, 2009–23)</strong> — Council-of-Europe-adjacent framework</li>
 <li>The tribunal represents a <strong>major evolution in international criminal law since the Rome Statute (1998)</strong> — institutionalising aggression-crime accountability outside UNSC veto politics</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[MEDIUM]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[MEDIUM]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-medium"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's <strong>direct fiscal contribution</strong>: EPA assessed dues (estimate: SEK 30–80 M annually based on Council-of-Europe EPA patterns) — modest</li>
 <li><strong>Indirect fiscal exposure</strong>: Zero — reparations architecture (HD03232) funded from Russian immobilised assets, not Swedish treasury</li>
 <li><strong>Asymmetric cost-benefit</strong>: Low direct cost, high signalling value; enhanced reconstruction-contract positioning for Swedish firms (Saab, Volvo, Assa Abloy, Ericsson)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Diplomatic</strong>: Russia has condemned all accountability mechanisms; additional rhetorical/diplomatic hostility expected</li>
 <li><strong>Hybrid-warfare</strong>: See <code>threat-analysis.md</code> T6 — MEDIUM-HIGH likelihood, HIGH impact</li>
@@ -5457,7 +5457,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code>
 <li><strong>Reputational</strong>: Low downside, high upside</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["SWOT — HD03231 Ukraine Aggression Tribunal"]
         direction TB
@@ -5508,7 +5508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Me
     style T2 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5546,7 +5546,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interaction</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1 × T1</strong></td><td>Founding-member status elevates hybrid-targeting probability</td><td>SÄPO / MSB heightened readiness during operational phase</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3 × W1</strong></td><td>NATO alignment partially compensates for non-member cooperation gap via allied intelligence-sharing</td><td>Sweden → Council of Europe tribunal liaison via NATO channels</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4 × W3</strong></td><td>Nuremberg rhetoric harder to counter legally than jurisdictional technicalities</td><td>Opposition argumentation forced onto weaker ground</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O2 × T2</strong></td><td>Multilateral leadership posture hedges against US volatility</td><td>EU coalition-building is primary mitigator</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5680,7 +5680,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors">4. Stakeholder Positions — N
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Evidence / Rationale</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Countersigned HD03231 / HD03232; political owner</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Tribunal architect; Nuremberg-framing author</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Legal-framework support role</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Liberal internationalism</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch (KD, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Coalition party-leader</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>S led 2022 Ukraine response</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Accountability support with NATO-framing caution</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP, språkrör)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>International-law alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>SD has consistently supported Ukraine since 2022</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok (C, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Liberal European internationalism</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky (Ukraine)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Central proponent; Hague Convention co-signatory</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF MFA)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 −5</td><td>Designated SE "unfriendly" 2022; hostile posture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Framework body</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU External Action Service</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Foreign-policy alignment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration (2026)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +0 to +2</td><td>Historical ICC reluctance; tribunal-specific position ambiguous</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICC</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Complementary relationship — fills aggression gap</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Amnesty International (Sweden)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Accountability priority</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Rights Defenders (Stockholm)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>War-crimes accountability focus</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Neutral ops</td><td>Threat-response mandate</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish defence industry (Saab, BAE Bofors, Volvo)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>Reconstruction positioning benefit</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-evidence-table">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5765,7 +5765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>Sweden becomes founding member of Special Tribunal</td><td>HD03231 proposition text</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>Tribunal seated at The Hague</td><td>HD03231 + Stenergard press release</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>Sweden signed letter of intent March 2026</td><td>Press release (Stenergard)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Context</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>First aggression tribunal since Nuremberg (1945–46)</td><td>FM Stenergard verbatim; ICC jurisdictional history</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH (framing)</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>Hague Convention adopted Dec 16 2025 with Zelensky</td><td>UD press release; diplomatic record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>Sweden part of core working group since Feb 2022</td><td>Press release timeline</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Context</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>Tribunal operates under Council of Europe EPA framework</td><td>HD03231 structural design</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Institutional</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>Russia has rejected all accountability mechanisms to date</td><td>Public record since 2022</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Prediction anchor</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>US tribunal-specific position not yet publicly committed</td><td>Open-source analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">Risk signal</td></tr><tr><td>E10</td><td>Swedish direct fiscal contribution limited to CoE EPA dues</td><td>HD03231 financial annex (not yet public in summary)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">Fiscal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation">6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation">6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5808,7 +5808,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-threat-model--stride-adaptation">6. Threat Model — STRIDE Adaptat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>STRIDE</th><th align="center">Applies to HD03231?</th><th>Evidence / Translation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Russian disinfo impersonating tribunal communications; Swedish diplomatic-channel phishing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td align="center">Partial</td><td>Legal-interpretation tampering by hostile fora; narrative tampering via propaganda</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Russia will repudiate jurisdiction; some Global South states may follow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I</strong>nformation Disclosure</td><td align="center">Limited</td><td>Leaks of tribunal working-group documents (unlikely, but not zero)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Cyber ops against tribunal infrastructure at The Hague; Swedish embassy/UD DoS</td></tr><tr><td><strong>E</strong>levation of Privilege</td><td align="center">No</td><td>Tribunal design constrains expansionary claims</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5879,7 +5879,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch">7. Indicator Library (What to Watc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I1</td><td><strong>Riksdag kammarvote on HD03231</strong></td><td>UU referral → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Late May / June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I2</td><td><strong>US administration tribunal statement</strong></td><td>White House / State Dept</td><td>US Gov</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I3</td><td>Council of Europe first founder list published</td><td>EPA instrument ratification count</td><td>Council of Europe</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I4</td><td>First tribunal docket opens</td><td>Tribunal registrar</td><td>Tribunal</td><td align="center">H2 2026 or later</td></tr><tr><td>I5</td><td>Russian rhetorical / diplomatic escalation</td><td>MFA spokesperson statements</td><td>RF</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>I6</td><td>Hybrid-warfare event targeting Sweden</td><td>SÄPO / MSB bulletins</td><td>SÄPO, MSB</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened)</td></tr><tr><td>I7</td><td>EU allied state co-accession pace</td><td>Instrument deposits</td><td>EU MS</td><td align="center">Q2–Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I8</td><td>Global South reception (India, Brazil, South Africa)</td><td>Diplomatic statements</td><td>Those states</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon">8. Forward Scenarios (Short + Medium Horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon">8. Forward Scenarios (Short + Medium Horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5917,7 +5917,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-scenarios-short--medium-horizon">8. Forward Scenarios (Shor
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">P</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Consequence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Riksdag ratification + broad European support</strong></td><td align="center">0.65</td><td>I1 passes; I3 shows 25+ founders</td><td>Tribunal operational by H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag ratification + limited European depth</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>I3 shows &#x3C; 15 founders</td><td>Operational but legitimacy-constrained</td></tr><tr><td>Delay / procedural hurdles</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td>Committee amendments</td><td>Entry-into-force 2027+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Major US defection</strong></td><td align="center">0.05</td><td>I2 hostile; asset-policy reversal</td><td>Reparations architecture weakened</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-cross-references">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-cross-references">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Companion</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>HD03232-analysis.md</code></a> — International Compensation Commission</li>
 <li><strong>Precedents</strong>: Nuremberg IMT (1945–46); SCSL (Sierra Leone, 2002–13); STL (Lebanon, 2009–23)</li>
@@ -5929,7 +5929,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-cross-references">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Depth</strong>: L2+ Strategic · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03232">HD03232<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5981,9 +5981,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03232">HD03232<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok ID</strong></td><td>HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td><em>Sveriges tillträde till konventionen om inrättande av en internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Department</strong></td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Responsible Minister</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) — Foreign Minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Countersigned by</strong></td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8/10</strong> · <strong>DIW ×0.95 = 7.60</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in this run</strong></td><td>🤝 Prominent Secondary (Co-prominent with HD03231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>🟠 <strong>L2+ Strategic</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii">1. Political Significance — Reparations Architecture for the Largest Inter-State Compensation Claim Since WWII<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii">1. Political Significance — Reparations Architecture for the Largest Inter-State Compensation Claim Since WWII<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-political-significance--reparations-architecture-for-the-largest-inter-state-compensation-claim-since-wwii"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden proposes to accede to the convention establishing an <strong>International Compensation Commission for Ukraine</strong> (the "Hague Compensation Commission" / ICCU). The commission is the institutional mechanism through which <strong>Russia can be held financially liable for the full-scale damages caused by its illegal invasion</strong>. It is the <strong>companion instrument</strong> to HD03231 (Special Tribunal) — together they constitute the Ukraine accountability architecture: <strong>criminal accountability of individuals</strong> (tribunal) + <strong>financial accountability of the state</strong> (commission).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-origins-and-foundation">Origins and foundation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-origins-and-foundation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-origins-and-foundation">Origins and foundation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-origins-and-foundation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6035,14 +6035,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-origins-and-foundation">Origins and foundation<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feb 24 2022</strong></td><td>Russia launches full-scale invasion</td><td>Damages begin accumulating</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nov 14 2022</strong></td><td>UNGA Resolution A/RES/ES-11/5 on reparations</td><td>Political foundation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May 2023</strong></td><td>Council of Europe Register of Damage established in The Hague</td><td>Claims-registration pre-commission</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2024</strong></td><td>World Bank RDNA3 estimates USD 486B+ damages (continues to grow)</td><td>Scale anchor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jan 2025</strong></td><td>G7 Ukraine Loan mechanism launches (profits from immobilised Russian assets)</td><td>Precursor asset-use architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dec 16 2025</strong></td><td>Hague Convention adopted at diplomatic conference (Zelensky present)</td><td>Treaty finalised</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Apr 16 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden tables HD03232</td><td><strong>This document</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026 – H1 2027</strong></td><td>Projected commission operational start</td><td>Claims-adjudication phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement">Strategic framing — FM Stenergard's statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-framing--fm-stenergards-statement"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"Genom skadeståndskommissionen kan Ryssland hållas ansvarigt för de skador som dess folkrättsvidriga handlingar har orsakat. Det ukrainska folket måste få upprättelse."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p><strong>Analyst note</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>"upprättelse" (vindication/restoration)</strong> framing is doctrinally important — it positions the commission within the <strong>ius cogens reparations doctrine</strong> (state responsibility for internationally wrongful acts) rather than as mere transactional transfer. This distinguishes ICCU from G7-profit distribution and grounds it in customary international law.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1">2. Six-Lens Analytical Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-lens-analytical-framework-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Riksdag approval required for treaty accession (RF 10 kap.)</li>
 <li>ICCU is a <strong>treaty-based international organisation</strong> with claims-registration → adjudication → awards → enforcement pipeline</li>
@@ -6055,7 +6055,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-constitutional--legal-lens-high-1">2.1 Constitutional / Legal Lens
 </li>
 <li>Sweden's accession locks in Swedish <strong>voice in enforcement-mechanism selection</strong></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Consensus issue</strong>: Same near-universal support as HD03231 (≈349 MPs projected)</li>
 <li><strong>Populist-positive framing</strong>: "Russia pays, not Swedish taxpayers" — aligns with SD, C, M, KD messaging</li>
@@ -6063,7 +6063,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-22-electoral--political-lens-high-1">2.2 Electoral / Political Lens <
 <li><strong>Rare cross-ideological policy</strong>: Both left and right can champion without compromise</li>
 <li>Expected Riksdag vote: late spring / early summer 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Reparations mechanism designed to <strong>complement</strong> the tribunal (criminal accountability) with <strong>structural financial accountability</strong></li>
 <li><strong>Immobilised Russian sovereign assets (≈ EUR 260B)</strong>: The primary source contemplated. Distribution:
@@ -6076,7 +6076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-23-geopolitical--security-lens-high-1">2.3 Geopolitical / Security Le
 <li>G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025) uses <strong>profits</strong> from immobilised assets — this is the first institutional use; HD03232 potentially extends to principal use</li>
 <li>Sweden's membership strengthens its voice in how the mechanism handles asset-use decisions — particularly <strong>EU-internal cleavage</strong> between asset-seizure hawks (Poland, Baltic states, Finland) and state-immunity cautious (Germany, France, Belgium)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Most direct precedent: UN Compensation Commission (UNCC) for Iraq/Kuwait, 1991–2022</strong>
 <ul>
@@ -6090,7 +6090,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-24-historical--precedent-lens-high-1">2.4 Historical / Precedent Lens
 <li><strong>Iran–US Claims Tribunal (1981–)</strong>: Algiers Accords model; still active after 40+ years</li>
 <li>Ukraine damages (USD 486B+ World Bank 2024) are ≈ 10× the Iraq–Kuwait figure — <strong>unprecedented scale</strong></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Sweden's own contribution to ICCU</strong>: Administrative costs only (modest — SEK 10–40M annually estimate based on analogous UN/CoE administrative commissions)</li>
 <li><strong>Reparations fund source</strong>: Russian state (immobilised assets + future Russian obligations) — <strong>not Swedish taxpayers</strong></li>
@@ -6098,7 +6098,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-25-economic--fiscal-lens-high">2.5 Economic / Fiscal Lens <code>[HIGH
 <li><strong>Swedish indirect upside</strong>: Reconstruction-contract positioning for Swedish firms (Skanska, NCC, Peab, ABB Sweden, Ericsson, Volvo Construction Equipment) — early-accession status strengthens lobbying position</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal risk</strong>: Zero direct exposure; indirect exposure only if Sweden later contributes to bridging financing (political choice)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Legal</strong>: Russia will refuse participation; enforcement depends on asset-repurposing coalition sustainability</li>
 <li><strong>Diplomatic</strong>: Russian retaliation parallel to HD03231</li>
@@ -6108,7 +6108,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-26-risk--threat-lens-high-1">2.6 Risk / Threat Lens <code>[HIGH]</cod
 <li><strong>Coalition</strong>: G7 disagreements on asset-use could undermine funding</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["SWOT — HD03232 International Compensation Commission"]
         direction TB
@@ -6159,7 +6159,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-swot-analysis-color-coded-mermaid-1">3. SWOT Analysis (Color-Coded
     style T2 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights-1">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights-1">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-highlights-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6197,7 +6197,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tows-interference-highlights-1">TOWS Interference Highlights<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interaction</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S3 × T4</strong></td><td>Zero-taxpayer framing inoculates against Swedish reparations-fatigue</td><td>Narrative discipline: keep "Russia pays" in public messaging</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4 × O2</strong></td><td>Unprecedented-scale claims → unprecedented-scale reconstruction contracts</td><td>Industrial strategy opportunity — Swedish firms should prepare</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W1 × T2</strong></td><td>Compound coalition-fragility risk</td><td>Nordic + EU + UK axis critical as US hedge</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S1 × O3</strong></td><td>Founding membership locks in decision-making voice through decadal timeline</td><td>Institutional persistence pays off across political cycles</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1">4. Stakeholder Positions — Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6331,7 +6331,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-stakeholder-positions--named-actors-1">4. Stakeholder Positions —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Evidence / Rationale</th><th align="center">Conf.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Countersigned HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>+5</strong></td><td>Champion; signed Dec 2025 Hague Convention</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance Minister)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Fiscal framing support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson (L, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Liberal internationalism</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch (KD, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Coalition support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Former PM; led 2022 Ukraine response</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +3</td><td>"Russia pays" framing aligns with SD messaging</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V, party leader)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Accountability support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>International-law focus</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky (Ukraine)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +5</td><td>Central proponent</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>G7 finance ministers</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4 to +5</td><td>G7 Ukraine Loan precedent; varied on principal-use</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>European Commission (von der Leyen)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Continued asset-immobilisation advocacy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Belgian government (Euroclear host)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +1 to +3</td><td>Legal-exposure concerns on principal-use</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>German Finance Ministry</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +2</td><td>State-immunity caution</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US Treasury</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +0 to +3</td><td>Position-dependent on 2026+ administration</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (RF MFA)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 −5</td><td>Calls mechanism "illegal"</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UN Secretary-General</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>UNGA resolution author</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>World Bank</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>RDNA3 damages-estimate provider</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICRC (Geneva)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 +2</td><td>Victim-focus alignment; cautious on political frames</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish construction / reconstruction firms</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 +4</td><td>Long-horizon contract opportunity</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table-1">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-evidence-table-1">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-evidence-table-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6416,7 +6416,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-evidence-table-1">5. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Claim</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>E1</td><td>Hague Convention adopted Dec 16 2025 with Zelensky present</td><td>UD press release; diplomatic record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E2</td><td>UNGA Resolution Nov 2022 establishes political basis</td><td>A/RES/ES-11/5</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Institutional</td></tr><tr><td>E3</td><td>Sweden signed at Dec 16 2025 conference (founding signatory)</td><td>UD; HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>E4</td><td>Total Ukraine damages USD 486B+</td><td>World Bank RDNA3 (2024); continues rising</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Scale anchor</td></tr><tr><td>E5</td><td>Immobilised Russian sovereign assets ≈ EUR 260B</td><td>EU + G7 reports</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Funding source</td></tr><tr><td>E6</td><td>EUR 191B concentrated at Euroclear Belgium</td><td>Euroclear disclosures</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Operational</td></tr><tr><td>E7</td><td>G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025) uses profits, not principal</td><td>G7 communiqué Jan 2025</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Precedent</td></tr><tr><td>E8</td><td>UNCC precedent: USD 52.4B over 31 years</td><td>UN records</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Benchmark</td></tr><tr><td>E9</td><td>HD03232 is companion to HD03231 (criminal + civil accountability)</td><td>HD03231 / HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">Architecture</td></tr><tr><td>E10</td><td>Sweden's direct fiscal contribution limited to administrative costs</td><td>HD03232 (inferred; full financial annex pending)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">Fiscal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios">6. Bayesian Path Analysis (Conditional Scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios">6. Bayesian Path Analysis (Conditional Scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 2026-04-16&#x3C;br/>HD03232 tabled"]
     RV{"Riksdag vote&#x3C;br/>late spring 2026"}
@@ -6437,7 +6437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-bayesian-path-analysis-conditional-scenarios">6. Bayesian Path Anal
     style PRIN fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style COLL fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1">7. Indicator Library (What to Watch)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6508,7 +6508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-indicator-library-what-to-watch-1">7. Indicator Library (What to Wa
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Decision-Maker</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I1</td><td><strong>Riksdag kammarvote on HD03232</strong></td><td>UU referral → kammaren</td><td>Riksdag</td><td align="center">Late May / June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I2</td><td>G7 finance-ministers statement on asset-use architecture</td><td>G7 communiqué</td><td>G7 FMs</td><td align="center">Next summit</td></tr><tr><td>I3</td><td>Belgian parliament asset-principal legislation</td><td>Legislative action</td><td>Belgian parliament</td><td align="center">Q3–Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>I4</td><td>First ICCU claim adjudicated</td><td>Commission registrar</td><td>ICCU</td><td align="center">H2 2026 / 2027</td></tr><tr><td>I5</td><td>US Treasury asset-policy statement</td><td>Public guidance</td><td>US Gov</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>I6</td><td>Russian diplomatic response (note verbale)</td><td>MFA</td><td>RF</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>I7</td><td>Ukrainian war-damage baseline update</td><td>World Bank RDNA4</td><td>World Bank</td><td align="center">2026–2027</td></tr><tr><td>I8</td><td>EU member state ratification count</td><td>Deposits with depositary</td><td>EU MS</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-scenario-snapshot">8. Scenario Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-scenario-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-scenario-snapshot">8. Scenario Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-scenario-snapshot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6546,7 +6546,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-scenario-snapshot">8. Scenario Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">P</th><th>Key Trigger</th><th>Consequence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Profits-distribution (baseline)</strong></td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>Current G7 approach persists</td><td>Incremental payouts; decadal timeline; broad legitimacy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Principal-use breakthrough</strong></td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Belgian legislative change + G7 coordination</td><td>Faster large payouts; heightened legal contestation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition fragility</strong></td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>US policy shift 2026+</td><td>Reduced asset pool; political fragmentation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Commission stall</strong></td><td align="center">0.05</td><td>Structural dysfunction</td><td>Process-without-delivery failure mode</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-cross-references-1">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-cross-references-1">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Companion</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>HD03231-analysis.md</code></a> — Special Tribunal for Aggression</li>
 <li><strong>Precedents</strong>: UNCC (Iraq–Kuwait, 1991–2022, USD 52.4B over 31 years); Iran–US Claims Tribunal (1981–); Post-WWII German reparations tracks</li>
@@ -6558,7 +6558,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-cross-references-1">9. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Depth</strong>: L2+ Strategic · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6586,11 +6586,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Situate Swedish reforms within comparative democratic practice — press-freedom / digital-evidence law (KU-cluster) and aggression-accountability architecture (Ukraine cluster)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>Structured comparative-politics analysis (most-similar / most-different design)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Calibration</strong></td><td>Each comparison labelled with <code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> based on source depth</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom">🧭 Section 1 — Digital-Evidence Transparency: How Other Democracies Balance Investigative Integrity vs Press Freedom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom">🧭 Section 1 — Digital-Evidence Transparency: How Other Democracies Balance Investigative Integrity vs Press Freedom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--digital-evidence-transparency-how-other-democracies-balance-investigative-integrity-vs-press-freedom"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: KU33 narrows "allmän handling" status for digital material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. How do comparable constitutional democracies reconcile press-freedom doctrine with investigative-integrity concerns over seized digital evidence?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6696,7 +6696,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Slippery-slope precedent for further TF compression</li>
 </ol>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design">Nordic Transparency Models — Most-Similar Design<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design">Nordic Transparency Models — Most-Similar Design<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6743,11 +6743,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-transparency-models--most-similar-design">Nordic Transparency
 <p><strong>Recommendation from comparative analysis</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's Lagrådet and Riksdag should <strong>benchmark "formellt tillförd bevisning" against Norway's clearer statutory triggers and Finland's "investigation concluded" standard</strong>. The comparative weakness of the current draft is lack of sunset / trigger clarity, not the carve-out itself.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 2 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Similar Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 2 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Similar Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-similar-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: HD03231 (Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression) and HD03232 (International Compensation Commission). Historical and comparative benchmarks for assessing likely trajectory.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks">Historical Aggression-Tribunal Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks">Historical Aggression-Tribunal Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6810,7 +6810,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-historical-aggression-tribunal-benchmarks">Historical Aggression-Trib
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tribunal</th><th>Era</th><th>Structure</th><th>Outcome</th><th>Relevance to HD03231</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Nuremberg (IMT)</strong></td><td>1945–46</td><td>4-power occupier tribunal</td><td>12 death sentences, 3 life sentences, 4 acquittals</td><td>Direct precedent; explicitly invoked by FM Stenergard</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tokyo (IMTFE)</strong></td><td>1946–48</td><td>11-nation tribunal</td><td>7 death sentences, 16 life sentences</td><td>Also aggression-crime precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICTY</strong> (Yugoslavia)</td><td>1993–2017</td><td>UNSC ad hoc</td><td>90 sentenced (Milošević died pre-verdict)</td><td>Jurisdictional innovation precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICTR</strong> (Rwanda)</td><td>1994–2015</td><td>UNSC ad hoc</td><td>62 convictions</td><td>Complete record of operations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SCSL</strong> (Sierra Leone)</td><td>2002–13</td><td>UN + Sierra Leone</td><td>Convicted Charles Taylor (sitting HoS era)</td><td>Sitting-HoS immunity piercing precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ICC (Rome Statute)</strong></td><td>2002–</td><td>Treaty-based</td><td>124 states parties; aggression jurisdiction limited (Kampala amendments)</td><td>Complementary to HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>STL</strong> (Lebanon/Hariri)</td><td>2009–23</td><td>UN + Lebanon, Council of Europe-support model</td><td>Limited convictions</td><td>Structural model for HD03231</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03231-distinctive-features">HD03231 Distinctive Features<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231-distinctive-features"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03231-distinctive-features">HD03231 Distinctive Features<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231-distinctive-features"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6859,7 +6859,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03231-distinctive-features">HD03231 Distinctive Features<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD03231 (Ukraine)</th><th>Closest Precedent</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Jurisdictional base</td><td>Council of Europe + state accessions</td><td>STL (Council of Europe support)</td><td>Novel at this scale</td></tr><tr><td>Crime coverage</td><td>Aggression only (gap-filler vs ICC)</td><td>IMT Nuremberg Count Two</td><td>Narrow, focused design</td></tr><tr><td>Sitting-HoS immunity</td><td><strong>Targets Russian leadership despite</strong></td><td>ICJ <em>Arrest Warrant</em> (2002) — general immunity; SCSL Taylor carve-out</td><td><strong>Legal frontier</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Victim state involvement</td><td>Ukraine co-founder</td><td>ICTY (Bosnia), SCSL (Sierra Leone)</td><td>Consistent pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement mechanism</td><td>State-cooperation; parallel asset-immobilisation</td><td>ICC</td><td>Limited without US participation</td></tr><tr><td>Expected caseload</td><td>Highest-level Russian officials</td><td>IMT scope</td><td>Precedent-scale</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents">International Compensation Commission Precedents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents">International Compensation Commission Precedents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6919,7 +6919,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-international-compensation-commission-precedents">International Compe
 <p><strong>Key comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The UNCC (Iraq–Kuwait) is the closest modern precedent. It distributed USD 52.4 B over 31 years funded from Iraqi oil-export revenues. HD03232's architecture is <strong>structurally similar but with a larger funding source</strong> (≈ EUR 260 B immobilised Russian assets at Euroclear + other G7 venues) and a <strong>larger damage envelope</strong> (~USD 486 B World Bank 2024 estimate). The analytic prior is: <strong>decadal-timeline, partial satisfaction, political sustainability challenges</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk">🧭 Section 3 — Press-Freedom Indices — Sweden's Position and Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk">🧭 Section 3 — Press-Freedom Indices — Sweden's Position and Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6956,7 +6956,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-3--press-freedom-indices--swedens-position-and-risk">🧭 Se
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Index</th><th align="center">2025 Rank</th><th>Methodology Sensitivity to KU33</th><th>Projected Direction Post-Amendment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RSF World Press Freedom Index</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>4</strong></td><td>HIGH — specifically tracks constitutional press-freedom changes</td><td>↓ 2–5 ranks plausible <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom House (Press component)</strong></td><td align="center">98/100</td><td>MEDIUM — tracks legal framework</td><td>↓ 2–4 points plausible <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V-Dem Civil Liberties</strong></td><td align="center">0.96</td><td>LOW — absorbs within broader civil-liberties score</td><td>Minor <code>[LOW]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom on the Net</strong></td><td align="center">93/100</td><td>MEDIUM — digital-freedom focus relevant to KU33</td><td>↓ 1–3 points <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context">Historical Sweden Index Movement (Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context">Historical Sweden Index Movement (Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6997,7 +6997,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-historical-sweden-index-movement-context">Historical Sweden Index Mov
 <p><strong>Comparative framing</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's RSF rank is currently <strong>higher than</strong> Germany (10), UK (23), US (45), France (21) — giving room to decline somewhat without falling below comparable democracies. The <strong>reputational risk is reputational headline-grabbing more than substantive ranking collapse</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context">🧭 Section 4 — EU Accessibility Act Precedent (KU32 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context">🧭 Section 4 — EU Accessibility Act Precedent (KU32 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7050,7 +7050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4--eu-accessibility-act-precedent-ku32-context">🧭 Section
 <p><strong>Comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden is <strong>the only EU member state requiring a grundlag amendment</strong> to implement EAA. This reflects the unusual constitutional scope of TF/YGL over grundlag-protected publishing activity. The novel Swedish grundlag route is <strong>not a regulatory over-reach</strong> but a constitutional necessity. This fact rebuts some "constitutional sprawl" framings.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies">🧭 Section 5 — Opposition-Exploitation Patterns in Comparable Democracies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies">🧭 Section 5 — Opposition-Exploitation Patterns in Comparable Democracies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7097,7 +7097,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--opposition-exploitation-patterns-in-comparable-democracie
 <p><strong>Comparative insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: The 2008 FRA-lagen episode is Sweden's most directly analogous prior — an intelligence/privacy constitutional reform that produced an <strong>attentive-voter mobilisation</strong> (Piratpartiet surge). KU33 carries similar risk structure but without a current single-issue vehicle for mobilisation; <strong>V/MP are the most likely beneficiaries</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders">🧭 Section 6 — Diplomatic Response Patterns to Aggression-Tribunal Founders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders">🧭 Section 6 — Diplomatic Response Patterns to Aggression-Tribunal Founders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-founders"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7150,7 +7150,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--diplomatic-response-patterns-to-aggression-tribunal-found
 <p><strong>Comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The Finnish precedent (instrumentalised migration pressure at border 2023–24) and the Baltic cable-sabotage pattern (2023–24) give the strongest priors for what Sweden faces. Riksdagsmonitor's R1 score of 16/25 is <strong>consistent with comparative observations</strong>, not alarmist.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sources">📎 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">📎 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Reporters Without Borders, <em>World Press Freedom Index 2025</em></li>
 <li>Freedom House, <em>Freedom in the World 2025</em> / <em>Freedom on the Net 2025</em></li>
@@ -7164,7 +7164,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sources">📎 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li>Various national public-records / transparency acts (Offentleglova, IFG, FOIA, Loi 1881, etc.)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> scenarios Base/Bull-Lite use Nordic-model analogy</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T6 Russian hybrid-warfare calibrated against Finland / Estonia / Lithuania precedents</li>
@@ -7174,7 +7174,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: Comparative-politics analysis v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7198,7 +7198,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-with-data-depth">🗂️ Document Classification (with Data Depth)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-with-data-depth"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-with-data-depth">🗂️ Document Classification (with Data Depth)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-with-data-depth"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7289,7 +7289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-with-data-depth">🗂️ Document Classif
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Policy Area</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Type</th><th align="center">Committee</th><th align="center">Sensitivity</th><th align="center">Scope</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Grundlag?</th><th align="center">Data Depth</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Constitutional Law / Press Freedom / Criminal Procedure</td><td align="center"><strong>P0 — Constitutional</strong></td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">KU</td><td align="center">Public-interest high</td><td align="center">National + durable</td><td align="center">Pre-election</td><td align="center"><strong>YES (TF)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>L3 Intelligence</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Constitutional Law / Media / Accessibility</td><td align="center"><strong>P0 — Constitutional</strong></td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">KU</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">National + durable</td><td align="center">Pre-election</td><td align="center"><strong>YES (TF + YGL)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>L3 Intelligence</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Foreign Policy / International Criminal Law / Ukraine</td><td align="center">P1 — Critical</td><td align="center">Proposition</td><td align="center">UU</td><td align="center">Public-interest high</td><td align="center">International</td><td align="center">H1 2026</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>Foreign Policy / Reparations / Ukraine</td><td align="center">P1 — Critical</td><td align="center">Proposition</td><td align="center">UU</td><td align="center">Public-interest high</td><td align="center">International</td><td align="center">H1 2026</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Housing Policy / Financial Markets / AML</td><td align="center">P2 — Important</td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">Sector</td><td align="center">2027</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property Law / AML / Organised Crime</td><td align="center">P2 — Important</td><td align="center">Betänkande</td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">Sector</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center"><strong>L2 Strategic</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid">Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid">Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Q1{"Does the document&#x3C;br/>amend a grundlag?"}
     Q1 -->|YES| P0["🔴 P0 — Constitutional&#x3C;br/>(KU32, KU33)"]
@@ -7307,7 +7307,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-mermaid">Sensitivity Decision Tree (Mermaid
     style P2b fill:#FFC107,color:#000000
     style P3 fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-policy-domain-mapping">🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-policy-domain-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-mapping">🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7345,7 +7345,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-policy-domain-mapping">🗺️ Policy Domain Mapping<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Documents</th><th align="center">Weighted Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Constitutional Law / Press Freedom / Democratic Infrastructure</strong></td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGHEST</strong> (DIW-weighted lead)</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine / Foreign Policy / International Criminal Law</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Housing / Property / AML</td><td>HD01CU28, HD01CU27</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal Justice / Organised Crime</td><td>HD01KU33 (partial), HD01CU27</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (cross-cutting)</td></tr><tr><td>Disability Rights / EU Compliance</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages">🇪🇺 EU, Council of Europe &#x26; International Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages">🇪🇺 EU, Council of Europe &#x26; International Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7389,7 +7389,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--eu-council-of-europe--international-linkages">🇪🇺 EU, Council o
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>International Linkage</th><th>Treaty / Instrument</th><th align="center">Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>EU Accessibility Act</td><td>Directive 2019/882 (in force Jun 2025)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Venice Commission / RSF Index</td><td>Council of Europe press-freedom benchmarks</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong> (post-entry-into-force monitoring)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression</td><td>Council of Europe framework; Rome Statute aggression gap</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>International Compensation Commission</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 2025; UNGA 2022 reparations resolution</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>EU AML Directive (AMLD6)</td><td>EU AML framework</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-implications">🎯 Publication Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-implications">🎯 Publication Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7417,7 +7417,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-implications">🎯 Publication Implications<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Classification Signal</th><th>Article Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Two P0 Constitutional docs in same run</td><td>Lead MUST be constitutional</td></tr><tr><td>Two P1 Critical foreign-policy docs</td><td>MUST have prominent dedicated section</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag + historic foreign-policy in same day</td><td>Coverage-completeness mandate: no omissions</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande pending</td><td>Uncertainty signal to flag in article</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-data-depth-levels-applied">🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-data-depth-levels-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-depth-levels-applied">🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-depth-levels-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7473,7 +7473,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-data-depth-levels-applied">🗄️ Data Depth Levels Applied<a cl
 <li><strong>L2 Strategic</strong>: SWOT Mermaid; named-actor table; evidence table; indicator library; implementation-risk table</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--retention--review-cadence">📅 Retention &#x26; Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--retention--review-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--review-cadence">📅 Retention &#x26; Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--review-cadence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7528,7 +7528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--retention--review-cadence">📅 Retention &#x26; Review Cadence<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Artefact</th><th>Retention</th><th align="center">Review Cadence</th><th>Trigger Events</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>All analysis files</td><td>Permanent (public archive)</td><td align="center">Quarterly (or event-driven)</td><td>See triggers below</td></tr><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">On next Lagrådet yttrande publication</td><td>Lagrådet ruling</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">Bi-weekly during legislative tempo</td><td>R1/R2/R11 indicator fires</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">Event-driven (major signals)</td><td>Any scenario indicator fires</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">Annual (RSF/FH/V-Dem cycle)</td><td>Index-publication dates</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">One-off reference artefact</td><td>Methodology change</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td><td>Permanent</td><td align="center">On kammarvote; post-implementation</td><td>Voting + operational milestones</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis">Trigger Events Requiring Re-Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis">Trigger Events Requiring Re-Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7566,7 +7566,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-trigger-events-requiring-re-analysis">Trigger Events Requiring Re-Ana
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Files to Re-Review</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td>Analyst on duty</td><td>risk-assessment, swot-analysis, documents/HD01KU32-KU33, synthesis-summary, executive-brief, scenarios</td></tr><tr><td>Kammarvote on KU33 (first reading)</td><td>Analyst</td><td>documents/HD01KU32-KU33, stakeholder-perspectives, synthesis-summary</td></tr><tr><td>Kammarvote on HD03231/HD03232</td><td>Analyst</td><td>documents/HD03231, documents/HD03232, threat-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare event attributable</td><td>Analyst</td><td>threat-analysis, risk-assessment</td></tr><tr><td>2026 election result</td><td>Analyst</td><td>ALL files (full re-derivation of post-election scenarios)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--access-control-impact">🔐 Access-Control Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--access-control-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-access-control-impact">🔐 Access-Control Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-control-impact"></a></h3>
 <p>Classification <strong>Public</strong> means:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All files publishable on <code>github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor</code></li>
@@ -7589,7 +7589,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--access-control-impact">🔐 Access-Control Impact<a class="" aria-hi
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7609,7 +7609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>XREF-ID</strong></td><td>XRF-2026-04-17-1434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-17 14:34 UTC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context">🕸️ Document Linkage Graph (Constitutional Lead + Ukraine Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context">🕸️ Document Linkage Graph (Constitutional Lead + Ukraine Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     %% Constitutional cluster (LEAD)
     HD01KU33["HD01KU33&#x3C;br/>Search/Seizure Digital&#x3C;br/>🏛️ LEAD"]
@@ -7691,8 +7691,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-linkage-graph-constitutional-lead--ukraine-context">🕸
     style NUREMBERG fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style ELECT2026 fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--thematic-clusters">🧱 Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead">Cluster A — Constitutional Reform (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">🧱 Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead">Cluster A — Constitutional Reform (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32</strong> (this run, first reading)</li>
 <li>Constitutional mechanics: TF (1766), YGL (1991), RF 8 kap. 14 §</li>
@@ -7700,14 +7700,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-a--constitutional-reform-lead">Cluster A — Constitutional R
 <li><strong>Second reading required post-Sep-2026 election</strong> — structurally embeds KU33/KU32 in 2026 valrörelse</li>
 <li>Institutional review: Lagrådet yttrande pending</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability">Cluster B — Ukraine Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability">Cluster B — Ukraine Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-accountability"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03231 + HD03232</strong> (this run, propositions)</li>
 <li>Institutional pillars: Council of Europe, Nuremberg precedent, ICC gap, Hague Convention Dec 2025</li>
 <li>Financial architecture: G7 Ukraine Loan (Jan 2025), Euroclear EUR 191B, Russian assets ~EUR 260B</li>
 <li>Security context: NATO accession (March 2024)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--property--aml">Cluster C — Property / AML<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--property--aml"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--property--aml">Cluster C — Property / AML<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--property--aml"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28 + HD01CU27</strong> (this run)</li>
 <li>Policy lineage: gäng-agenda (Prop 2025/26:100), juvenile-crime proposition (HD03246)</li>
@@ -7715,7 +7715,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-c--property--aml">Cluster C — Property / AML<a class="" ari
 <li>Fiscal context: Spring budget 2026 (HD0399)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027">⏱️ Contextual Timeline — Nuremberg → Rome → Hague → Stockholm → 2027<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027">⏱️ Contextual Timeline — Nuremberg → Rome → Hague → Stockholm → 2027<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title Accountability Architecture Timeline
     1945-1946 : Nuremberg Tribunal : First aggression prosecution
@@ -7735,7 +7735,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-contextual-timeline--nuremberg--rome--hague--stockholm--2027">⏱
     2026 : Sep 13 Swedish general election : Constitutional brake
     2027 : Jan 1 proposed entry into force : KU amendments + CU28 register</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical">🔗 Cross-Cluster Interference (Rhetorical)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical">🔗 Cross-Cluster Interference (Rhetorical)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7758,7 +7758,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-rhetorical">🔗 Cross-Cluster Interferen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tension</th><th>Description</th><th>Opposition Exploit Vector</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Constitutional × Ukraine</strong></td><td>Government championing aggression-tribunal (implicitly valorises journalists documenting Russian war crimes) while narrowing TF at home (KU33)</td><td>"Sweden defends press freedom abroad while compressing it at home" — V/MP/NGO talking point</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional × Housing</strong></td><td>AML/anti-crime rationale frames KU33 carve-out while CU27/CU28 expand registries — together suggest a coherent surveillance-adjacent trajectory</td><td>Privacy/V talking point — "mission creep"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--prior-run-forward-chain-table">🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--prior-run-forward-chain-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-run-forward-chain-table">🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-run-forward-chain-table"></a></h3>
 <p>Continuity with adjacent Riksdagsmonitor runs — so subsequent analysts can find antecedents and the causal chain:</p>
 
 
@@ -7801,7 +7801,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--prior-run-forward-chain-table">🔄 Prior-Run Forward-Chain Table<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>This Run</th><th>Prior-Run Context</th><th>Next Expected Run Event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong> (Apr 17)</td><td>Prop 2025/26:56 (gäng-agenda policy lineage, Q4 2025)</td><td>Kammarvote first reading May–Jun 2026 (separate run)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 (Apr 17)</td><td>2022 EU Accessibility Act transposition planning (Q2 2022)</td><td>Kammarvote first reading May–Jun 2026 (separate run)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong> (Apr 16)</td><td>Ukraine core-working-group Feb 2022; Hague Convention Dec 16 2025</td><td>Kammarvote late May / Jun 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 (Apr 16)</td><td>UNGA A/RES/ES-11/5 (Nov 2022); CoE Register of Damage (May 2023); Hague Convention Dec 16 2025</td><td>Kammarvote late May / Jun 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 (Apr 17)</td><td>SOU 2023/24 on bostadsrätt register</td><td>Implementation: register setup Jan 1 2027</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27 (Apr 17)</td><td>Hyresgästföreningen loophole documentation (2015–24)</td><td>Entry into force Jul 1 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one">Continuity Contracts (How Future Runs Inherit from This One)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one">Continuity Contracts (How Future Runs Inherit from This One)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7841,7 +7841,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-continuity-contracts-how-future-runs-inherit-from-this-one">Continuit
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7872,70 +7872,70 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 <p>Every reference-grade analysis should include a self-audit. This file is the one for realtime-1434 — the <strong>first run designated as Riksdagsmonitor's gold-standard exemplar</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection">1. DIW-Weighted Lead-Story Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection">1. DIW-Weighted Lead-Story Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-diw-weighted-lead-story-selection"></a></h4>
 <p>The Democratic-Impact Weighting methodology correctly elevated the grundlag package over raw news-value rank. Before DIW v1.0, the lede would have been Ukraine (raw 9). With DIW, the lead is KU33 (weighted 9.8). This is the correct democratic-infrastructure call.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Mandatory DIW table in every <code>significance-scoring.md</code> (see Rule 5 in <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70">2. Coverage-Completeness Rule (Weighted ≥ 7.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70">2. Coverage-Completeness Rule (Weighted ≥ 7.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-coverage-completeness-rule-weighted--70"></a></h4>
 <p>The rule prevents silent omission of co-prominent stories. Ukraine propositions (weighted 8.55 + 7.60) must appear as dedicated H3 sections even when lead is elsewhere.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Bash enforcement gate in <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> "Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate". <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim">3. Confidence Labels on Every Analytical Claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim">3. Confidence Labels on Every Analytical Claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-confidence-labels-on-every-analytical-claim"></a></h4>
 <p>Every claim in synthesis-summary, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder files carries <code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code>. This forces the analyst to distinguish observed fact from projection.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Template checklist item — any analytical sentence without a confidence label is flagged as template-filler in QA. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data">4. Color-Coded Mermaid With Real Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data">4. Color-Coded Mermaid With Real Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-color-coded-mermaid-with-real-data"></a></h4>
 <p>Every file has ≥ 1 Mermaid diagram with colour directives and real dok_ids / actor names. Zero placeholder diagrams.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Template preamble block with Mermaid colour palette (already in <code>political-style-guide.md</code>). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference-matrix">5. TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-tows-interference-matrix">5. TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h4>
 <p>The S4 × T1 cross-SWOT interference finding (that the interpretation of "formellt tillförd bevisning" is the strategic centre of gravity) is the <strong>single most actionable insight</strong> in the dossier. It emerged from TOWS, not vanilla SWOT.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Mandatory TOWS matrix in every <code>swot-analysis.md</code> when the run has ≥ 4 entries in any SWOT quadrant. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension">6. Cross-Cluster Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension">6. Cross-Cluster Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-cross-cluster-rhetorical-tension"></a></h4>
 <p>The "press freedom abroad vs at home" tension was identified, named, and analysed for exploitation vectors. Opposition parties will use this; the government will need a counter-narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: When a run covers ≥ 2 thematic clusters, the synthesis-summary MUST include a §Cross-Cluster Interference subsection. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride">7. Attack-Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride">7. Attack-Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-attack-tree--kill-chain--diamond-model--stride"></a></h4>
 <p>The threat-analysis file applies four complementary threat frameworks, each surfacing different dimensions (goal-decomposition, adversary-lifecycle, actor-infrastructure-capability-victim, and STRIDE classification). No single framework would have produced the full threat picture.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Threat-analysis template §3 (Frameworks) becomes a multi-framework checklist. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-bayesian-update-rules">8. Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-bayesian-update-rules">8. Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h4>
 <p>The risk-assessment file specifies <strong>observable signals</strong> (Lagrådet yttrande, S-leader statement, Nordic cable event) that trigger explicit prior/posterior risk-score updates. This makes the analysis <strong>living</strong> rather than static.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Every risk-assessment file MUST include a Bayesian-update-rules table. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking">9. International Comparative Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking">9. International Comparative Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-international-comparative-benchmarking"></a></h4>
 <p>The comparative file situated Swedish reforms against DE, UK, US, FR, Nordic, and EU benchmarks, revealing that Nordic neighbours operate <strong>exactly the regime KU33 proposes</strong> — a finding that directly refutes the strongest version of the "press-freedom regression" framing while preserving the interpretive-frontier concern.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Runs with P0 or P1 documents MUST include a <code>comparative-international.md</code> file. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities">10. Scenario Analysis With Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities">10. Scenario Analysis With Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-scenario-analysis-with-probabilities"></a></h4>
 <p>Base / Bull-Lite / Bear / Mixed / Wildcard-1 / Wildcard-2 scenarios with explicit prior probabilities that sum to 1.0. Monitoring indicators flip priors. The analysis becomes <strong>actionable</strong> for editorial and policy decisions.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Runs with multiple scenarios should produce a <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>; mandatory for P0. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager">11. Executive Brief (One-Pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager">11. Executive Brief (One-Pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-executive-brief-one-pager"></a></h4>
 <p>The <code>executive-brief.md</code> compresses the dossier into a 3-minute read for newsroom editors / policy advisors who will not read the full 11-file set.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Every run MUST produce an <code>executive-brief.md</code>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-12-readme--reading-order">12. README / Reading Order<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-readme--reading-order"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-12-readme--reading-order">12. README / Reading Order<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-readme--reading-order"></a></h4>
 <p>Directory <code>README.md</code> provides quality tier, reading order by audience (executive / policy / intelligence / tracker / methodologist), and copy-paste-safe top-line findings. Onboarding time reduced from 30 min to 5 min.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Every run MUST produce a folder-level <code>README.md</code>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns">❌ What Failed First-Pass (Documented Anti-Patterns)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents">AP-A: Silent Omission of Weighted ≥ 7 Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns">❌ What Failed First-Pass (Documented Anti-Patterns)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-failed-first-pass-documented-anti-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents">AP-A: Silent Omission of Weighted ≥ 7 Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-a-silent-omission-of-weighted--7-documents"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: First-draft English and Swedish articles <strong>entirely omitted HD03231 and HD03232</strong> despite their weighted scores being 8.55 and 7.60. The author prioritised grundlag lead but silently dropped Ukraine.</p>
 <p><strong>Root cause</strong>: No coverage-completeness check between analysis and article rendering.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed)</strong>: "Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate" in <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — bash verification step that greps article for every document with weighted ≥ 7 before commit.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> Rule 5 Anti-pattern A. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion">AP-B: News-Value vs Democratic-Impact Confusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion">AP-B: News-Value vs Democratic-Impact Confusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-b-news-value-vs-democratic-impact-confusion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: Raw significance score (9 for HD03231) would have led the article — correct for news-value but wrong for democratic-infrastructure impact.</p>
 <p><strong>Root cause</strong>: No systematic weighting framework distinguishing news-value from democratic-durability.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed)</strong>: DIW v1.0 methodology with specified multipliers per document type (×1.40 for TF narrowing, ×1.25 for TF expansion, ×0.95 for foreign-policy continuity).</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> Rule 5 + <code>significance-scoring.md</code> mandatory DIW section. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters">AP-C: Shallow Per-Doc Files for Secondary Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters">AP-C: Shallow Per-Doc Files for Secondary Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-c-shallow-per-doc-files-for-secondary-clusters"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: Initial per-doc files for HD03231, HD03232, CU27/CU28 were thin L1 (≈ 70–130 lines) without confidence labels, Mermaid diagrams, forward indicators, or stakeholder named actors — inconsistent with LEAD KU32/33 file (L3, 153 lines with full tradecraft).</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed in this iteration)</strong>: All per-doc files upgraded to at least L2+ quality — Mermaid, confidence labels on every claim, forward indicators with dates, named stakeholders, international comparison anchors.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: Template update — <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> gains an L1/L2/L3 depth-tier checklist; any document classified P0/P1 must be L2+ minimum. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest">AP-D: Stale Data Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest">AP-D: Stale Data Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-d-stale-data-manifest"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> retained obsolete "HD03231 ✅ LEAD / HD01KU32 ✅ Secondary" labels after DIW re-ranking.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (deployed)</strong>: Manifest refreshed to show DIW-corrected selection status.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: Template update — data manifest fields use "Selected? (post-DIW)" heading. Automated check: if significance-scoring.md disagrees with data-download-manifest.md on lead-story, block commit. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop">AP-E: Missing Self-Audit Loop<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop">AP-E: Missing Self-Audit Loop<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ap-e-missing-self-audit-loop"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Failure</strong>: Prior runs had no mechanism to capture lessons-learned and feed them upstream into the methodology guide and templates. Failures kept recurring.</p>
 <p><strong>Fix (this file)</strong>: <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> becomes a <strong>template artefact</strong> for future reference-grade runs.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson codified</strong>: Runs designated as reference exemplars MUST produce a methodology-reflection file. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommended-upstream-changes">🔧 Recommended Upstream Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommended-upstream-changes"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions">A. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Additions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-upstream-changes">🔧 Recommended Upstream Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-upstream-changes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions">A. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Additions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>§Rule 5 (DIW)</strong>: Already in place — keep, cite realtime-1434 as exemplar</li>
 <li><strong>§Rule 6 — Reference-Grade Depth Tiers</strong>: New rule specifying L1/L2/L3 content floors per document priority:
@@ -7950,7 +7950,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-a-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--additions">A. <code>ai-driven-analysis-
 <li><strong>§Rule 8 — International-Comparative Benchmarking</strong>: P0/P1 runs include <code>comparative-international.md</code></li>
 <li><strong>§Exemplar pointer</strong>: Cite realtime-1434 as canonical reference</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-b-templates--new-or-extended">B. Templates — New or Extended<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-templates--new-or-extended"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b-templates--new-or-extended">B. Templates — New or Extended<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-templates--new-or-extended"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -8027,14 +8027,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-b-templates--new-or-extended">B. Templates — New or Extended<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Template</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template (this file becomes reference content)</td></tr><tr><td><code>README.md</code> (folder index)</td><td align="center"><strong>NEW</strong></td><td>Create template based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Add Red-Team Box, Key-Uncertainties, ACH sections</td></tr><tr><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Mandatory TOWS matrix block</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Bayesian prior/posterior table + interconnection graph + ALARP ladder</td></tr><tr><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Kill Chain + Diamond Model + MITRE-style TTP library</td></tr><tr><td><code>stakeholder-impact.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Influence-network Mermaid + fracture-probability tree</td></tr><tr><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Sensitivity analysis + alternative rankings</td></tr><tr><td><code>political-classification.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>Sensitivity decision tree + data-depth levels</td></tr><tr><td><code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code></td><td align="center">EXTEND</td><td>L1/L2/L3 depth tiers with content floor per tier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes">C. Agentic Workflow Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes">C. Agentic Workflow Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-agentic-workflow-changes"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><code>news-realtime-monitor.md</code> Step D.2: enforce Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate (already deployed)</li>
 <li><code>news-realtime-monitor.md</code> Step D.3: (new) enforce reference-grade minimum file-set for P0 runs — exec-brief, scenarios, comparative, reflection, README</li>
 <li><code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code>: Add new §"Reference-Grade File Set" verifying presence of required files per priority tier</li>
 <li>All 12 agentic workflows: replicate the gate pattern consistently</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-d-skills-updates">D. Skills Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-skills-updates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-d-skills-updates">D. Skills Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-skills-updates"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>.github/skills/intelligence-analysis-techniques/SKILL.md</code>: Add ACH, Red-Team, Kill Chain, Diamond, Bayesian, scenario-tree references with pointer to realtime-1434 as exemplar</li>
 <li><code>.github/skills/editorial-standards/SKILL.md</code>: Already has Gate 0 (Lead-Story) — extend with reference-grade depth-tier guidance</li>
@@ -8042,7 +8042,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-d-skills-updates">D. Skills Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><code>.github/skills/investigative-journalism/SKILL.md</code>: Add interpretive-frontier analytic pattern (KU33 "formellt tillförd bevisning" as worked example)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved">📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs Achieved)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved">📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs Achieved)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8128,7 +8128,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--quality-metrics-target-vs-achieved">📈 Quality Metrics (Target vs
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">Target</th><th align="center">Achieved</th><th align="center">Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Files produced</td><td align="center">≥ 9</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong> (+5 new reference)</td><td align="center">+7</td></tr><tr><td>Mermaid diagrams</td><td align="center">≥ 1 per file</td><td align="center">≈ 1.3 per file</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labels</td><td align="center">Every claim</td><td align="center">✓ pervasive</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>dok_id citations</td><td align="center">Every major claim</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Named actors</td><td align="center">≥ 20</td><td align="center">25+</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>International benchmarks</td><td align="center">≥ 5</td><td align="center">12 jurisdictions</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Analyst frameworks applied</td><td align="center">≥ 2</td><td align="center">7 (DIW, TOWS, Attack-Tree, Kill Chain, Diamond, STRIDE, Bayesian, ACH)</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Forward indicators w/ dates</td><td align="center">≥ 8</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Scenarios with probabilities</td><td align="center">≥ 3</td><td align="center">6 (Base, Bull-Lite, Bear, Mixed, Wildcard-1, Wildcard-2)</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster tension analysis</td><td align="center">Required if ≥ 2 clusters</td><td align="center">✓ explicit</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Red-Team / ACH critique</td><td align="center">Recommended</td><td align="center">✓ in synthesis-summary</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>Self-audit</td><td align="center">Required for exemplar</td><td align="center">✓ this file</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo">🎯 Recommendation to Methodology Owner (CEO)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo">🎯 Recommendation to Methodology Owner (CEO)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Designate realtime-1434 as Riksdagsmonitor's reference exemplar</strong> for political-intelligence tradecraft. All future runs measure against it.</li>
 <li><strong>Merge this reflection's Section C upstream changes</strong> into <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 and template set.</li>
@@ -8139,7 +8139,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommendation-to-methodology-owner-ceo">🎯 Recommendation to Meth
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Exemplar Lock-In</strong>: 2026-09-01 (CEO sign-off required)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -8170,7 +8170,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>v5.1 note</strong>: "Selected?" column reflects <strong>post-DIW</strong> publication decision. See <code>significance-scoring.md</code> for weighting rationale.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8238,7 +8238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>MCP Tool</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Count</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdag propositioner (2025/26)</td><td><code>get_propositioner</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">272 total, 6 recent</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag betänkanden (2025/26)</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">20 retrieved</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag dokument search</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (2026-04-16 → 2026-04-17)</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">2,818 total</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag voteringar (2025/26)</td><td><code>search_voteringar</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">20 retrieved (latest: March 2026)</td></tr><tr><td>Regering pressmeddelanden</td><td><code>search_regering</code> (2026-04-16 → 2026-04-17)</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">15 found</td></tr><tr><td>Regering propositioner</td><td><code>search_regering</code> propositioner</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">3 found</td></tr><tr><td>Document content</td><td><code>get_g0v_document_content</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">1 fetched (Ukraine press release)</td></tr><tr><td>Document details</td><td><code>get_dokument</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">6 fetched</td></tr><tr><td>Sync status</td><td><code>get_sync_status</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Status: live</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection">📄 Key Documents Retrieved (Post-DIW Selection)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection">📄 Key Documents Retrieved (Post-DIW Selection)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8336,7 +8336,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-documents-retrieved-post-diw-selection">📄 Key Documents Retri
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Type</th><th align="center">Date</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th align="center">Weighted</th><th>Role</th><th align="center">Depth</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center"><strong>9.80</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong></td><td align="center">L3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td align="center">Prop</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td>🌍 Prominent</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td align="center"><strong>8.25</strong></td><td>📜 CO-LEAD</td><td align="center">L3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td align="center">Prop</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td>🤝 Prominent</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">5.80</td><td>🏠 Secondary</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td align="center">5.67</td><td>🏠 Secondary</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU22</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-17</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Context only</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">Bet</td><td align="center">2026-04-14</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Context (prev. covered)</td><td align="center">—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--excluded-documents-previously-covered">🚫 Excluded Documents (Previously Covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--excluded-documents-previously-covered"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-excluded-documents-previously-covered">🚫 Excluded Documents (Previously Covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-excluded-documents-previously-covered"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8364,7 +8364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--excluded-documents-previously-covered">🚫 Excluded Documents (Prev
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Covered in realtime-0029 (today, 00:29 UTC)</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Published Apr 13 — covered by other workflows</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Published Apr 13 — spring economic proposition</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Published Apr 13 — spring extra budget</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-freshness">🕐 Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-freshness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-freshness">🕐 Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Last riksdagen sync</strong>: 2026-04-17T14:34:37Z (live)</li>
 <li><strong>Data age at analysis start</strong>: &#x3C; 1 minute</li>
@@ -8372,7 +8372,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-freshness">🕐 Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Validity window</strong>: Until 2026-04-24 (next realtime scan) or event-driven refresh</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8421,6 +8421,27 @@ <h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custod
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Step</th><th>Tool / Responsible</th><th align="center">Timestamp (UTC)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MCP query batch</td><td>news-realtime-monitor agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:34</td></tr><tr><td>Document selection (post-DIW)</td><td>Agent + significance-scoring.md</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:36</td></tr><tr><td>Per-file analysis generation</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 14:38–15:10</td></tr><tr><td>Synthesis + cross-reference</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 15:12</td></tr><tr><td>Article rendering</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7 + rendering script</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 15:18</td></tr><tr><td>Lead-Story &#x26; Coverage-Completeness Gate</td><td>bash verification</td><td align="center">2026-04-17 15:20</td></tr><tr><td>Reference-grade upgrade (this version)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7 (2026-04-18 session)</td><td align="center">2026-04-18 07:30–</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -8461,7 +8482,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:01.459Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:23.100Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html b/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html
index c3897fafab..f4e5b71b33 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Realtime Monitor 1705">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:01.983Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.571Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:01.983Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.571Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-18T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1705","description":"On 2026-04-13 – 16, the Kristersson government tabled a coordinated four-document pre-election sprint: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100, DIW 9.5) sets the macro frame, an extra supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:01.983Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1705","description":"On 2026-04-13 – 16, the Kristersson government tabled a coordinated four-document pre-election sprint: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100, DIW 9.5) sets the macro frame, an extra supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:23.571Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -232,10 +232,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-18-1705</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or fiscal commentary based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs / 2 weeks / 2026-09-13 election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>On 2026-04-13 – 16, the Kristersson government tabled a coordinated four-document pre-election sprint: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100, DIW 9.5) sets the macro frame, an extra supplementary budget (HD03236, DIW 8.5) delivers fuel-tax cuts and electricity/gas subsidies to cost-of-living voters, Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer's youth-offender law (HD03246, DIW 7.5) toughens rules for 15–17 year-olds, and the SfU committee's migration-inhibition order (HD01SfU22, DIW 6.5) replaces temporary residence permits for deportation-blocked individuals.</strong> The package lands against a fragile macro backdrop — GDP growth just 0.82 % (2024) after −0.20 % (2023), unemployment at 8.7 % (≈ 450,000 people, 2025), inflation tamed to 2.84 % (2024 vs 8.55 % 2023). The most acute operational risk is the SiS youth-detention capacity crisis (already 100 %+ utilisation); the most acute legal risk is ECHR Article 3/5 exposure on HD01SfU22; the most acute fiscal-credibility risk is three mini-budgets in two months drawing Riksrevisionen commentary. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> · DIW rank 1 = HD03100</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition fiscal-credibility posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Fiscal Risk · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> BEAR scenario</td><td align="right">Before Riksrevisionen response on HD03241 (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ECHR / rights-NGO engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §Elevation of Privilege · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Migration</td><td align="right">Before HD01SfU22 enters force (target: June 2026)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03100 is the #1 story</strong> — Svantesson's vårproposition is the macro umbrella under which HD0399 (amendment budget) and HD03236 (extra budget) are being justified. Unemployment 8.7 % is the government's main attack surface. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>HD03236 (fuel + energy relief) is the electoral centrepiece</strong> — ~5.2 million car owners, all ~4.9 million household electricity customers benefit. S/V/MP cannot oppose on distributional grounds without electoral cost. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met</strong> — all four DIW ≥ 6.5 documents have dedicated article sections; HD0399 is cited inside HD03100. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance Minister)</strong></td><td>Vårproposition author</td><td>Political owner of the fiscal-competence narrative; Riksrevisionen exposure lands on her</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)</strong></td><td>HD03246 champion</td><td>Owns SiS-capacity implementation risk; BRÅ evidence-base critiques land on him</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance Minister) / Niklas Wykman (M, Financial Markets Minister)</strong></td><td>HD03236 fuel/energy budget architects</td><td>Coalition authors of cost-of-living measure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Forssell (M, Migration Minister)</strong></td><td>HD01SfU22 sponsor</td><td>Political owner of ECHR exposure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td>Package-level coordinator</td><td>Owns electoral framing; Tidö-agreement alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S, opposition leader)</strong></td><td>Labour-economics critic</td><td>Unemployment 8.7 % = her primary attack line</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</strong></td><td>Distribution critic</td><td>Energy-subsidy distributional critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Märta Stenevi / Amanda Lind (MP)</strong></td><td>Climate critic</td><td>Fuel-tax cut vs. EU-ETS / climate-target tension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</strong></td><td>Coalition-external partner</td><td>HD03246 + HD01SfU22 are SD core demands</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksrevisionen</strong></td><td>Independent audit</td><td>HD03241 fiscal-framework audit is the benchmark document</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional review</td><td>Expected pre-vote yttrande on HD03246 + HD01SfU22</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ECtHR (Strasbourg)</strong></td><td>Supra-national court</td><td>HD01SfU22 Article 3/5 litigation pathway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SiS (Statens institutionsstyrelse)</strong></td><td>Youth-detention operator</td><td>100 %+ capacity status is operational blocking indicator</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission (DG HOME)</strong></td><td>Returns-directive custodian</td><td>HD01SfU22 compatibility with Directive 2008/115/EC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Late April 2026</td><td><strong>FiU betänkande</strong> on HD03100</td><td>First committee amendments — opposition fiscal-credibility attack crystallises</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on HD03246 + HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>ECHR / rights-of-child flags; capacity-funding flags</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026</td><td><strong>SCB labour-market statistics</strong></td><td>If unemployment ticks up from 8.7 % baseline, HD03100 narrative falters</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026</td><td><strong>Riksrevisionen response on HD03241</strong></td><td>If adverse → fiscal-credibility BEAR scenario activates</td></tr><tr><td>Jun 2026</td><td><strong>HD01SfU22 entry into force</strong></td><td>First geographic-restriction orders issued → ECHR litigation window opens</td></tr><tr><td>Jun 2026</td><td><strong>First NGO joint remissvar</strong> (Rädda Barnen, Amnesty Sweden, Asylrättscentrum)</td><td>Public record on ECHR compatibility</td></tr><tr><td>Q3 2026</td><td><strong>First SiS capacity bulletin post-HD03246 enactment</strong></td><td>Operational implementation risk materialises</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td><strong>Swedish general election</strong></td><td>Package's electoral ROI measured</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -456,26 +456,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>HD03100 scores 9.5; next is 8.5 — stable gap</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All 4 DIW ≥ 6.5 documents in article</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal-framework stress projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Three mini-budgets in two months is empirically documented</td></tr><tr><td>SiS capacity crisis projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>100 %+ utilisation publicly reported by SiS in 2025</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR litigation probability (HD01SfU22)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Near-certain filings; adverse ruling magnitude is the uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment trajectory (2026)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>External tariff environment is the dominant variable</td></tr><tr><td>Election outcome (Sep 13 2026)</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Still five months out; campaign dynamics can shift significantly</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md">Classification</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Coverage:</strong> April 13-18, 2026 | <strong>Documents analyzed:</strong> 4 primary</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h3>
 <p>This monitoring cycle captures a dense legislative period in the final weeks before Sweden's 2026 summer recess, featuring an unusually large cluster of government propositions submitted on April 13-16. The dominant theme is <strong>fiscal expansion meeting crime policy escalation</strong> — the Kristersson government has deployed four simultaneous fiscal instruments (spring proposition, amendment budget, extra budget, tax accounts) alongside two justice reforms, signaling an election-oriented policy sprint.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100">Top-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 9.5): Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100">Top-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 9.5): Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's 2026 Vårproposition establishes a fiscal framework in a context of fragile recovery: GDP grew just 0.82% in 2024 after -0.20% in 2023, while unemployment remains at 8.7% (2025). Inflation has been tamed (2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023) but the jobs recovery lags. The proposition frames all other fiscal decisions in this cycle.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236">Second-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 8.5): Extra Supplementary Budget — Energy/Fuel Relief (HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236">Second-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 8.5): Extra Supplementary Budget — Energy/Fuel Relief (HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236"></a></h4>
 <p>An extraordinary supplementary budget combining fuel tax cuts with electricity and gas price subsidies represents a significant fiscal intervention. This politically motivated measure — coming weeks before the September 2026 Riksdag election campaign — benefits rural/suburban voters with high car dependency. Estimated cost: reduces state fuel excise revenue; offset partially by EU energy support instruments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246">Third-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 7.5): Stricter Youth Crime Law (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246">Third-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 7.5): Stricter Youth Crime Law (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246"></a></h4>
 <p>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer's proposition to tighten rules for young offenders (ages 15-17) advances the Tidö coalition's core crime agenda. With Sweden's youth gang violence continuing to attract international attention, this measure carries high political salience despite thin evidence of deterrent efficacy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22">Fourth-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 6.5): Migration Inhibition Order System (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22">Fourth-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 6.5): Migration Inhibition Order System (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22"></a></h4>
 <p>SfU committee approval of replacing temporary residence permits with inhibition orders for deportation-blocked individuals fundamentally tightens Sweden's migration system. Effective June 2026, this affects an estimated 2,000-4,000 individuals annually and carries significant ECHR litigation risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing">Cross-Cutting Theme: Election Posturing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing">Cross-Cutting Theme: Election Posturing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing"></a></h3>
 <p>All four major documents advance pre-election positioning: energy subsidies for cost-of-living voters, stricter crime laws for security voters, tighter migration for SD base voters. The spring proposition provides the macro cover for this spending.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -513,9 +513,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>DIW Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>9.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (fuel/energy)</td><td>prop</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>prop</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition av verkställigheten</td><td>bet</td><td>6.5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Methodology:</strong> DIW (Democratic Impact Weighting)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -642,22 +642,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Party Breadth</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>Defense</th><th>Crime/Social</th><th>Named Minister</th><th>Committee</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>8</td><td>+2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Svantesson</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>9.5</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (energy)</td><td>6</td><td>+2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Svantesson/Wykman</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>8.5</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga</td><td>5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>+2</td><td>Strömmer</td><td>JuU</td><td><strong>7.5</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>8</td><td>+2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Svantesson</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition av verkst.</td><td>5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>+1</td><td>Forssell</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>6.5</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Lann/Edholm</td><td>NU</td><td><strong>6.0</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Britz</td><td>NU</td><td><strong>5.5</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Kullgren</td><td>MJU</td><td><strong>5.0</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Avfallslagstiftning reform</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>—</td><td>MJU</td><td><strong>4.5</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-determination">Lead Story Determination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-determination"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-determination">Lead Story Determination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-determination"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>#1 DIW-ranked: HD03100 (9.5)</strong> — The Spring Economic Proposition 2026 is the year's defining fiscal document. Article title, meta description, and H1 MUST reference this document first.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-composite-coverage-decision">Composite Coverage Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-coverage-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-composite-coverage-decision">Composite Coverage Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-coverage-decision"></a></h3>
 <p>Generate breaking news article covering:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>PRIMARY</strong>: Spring budget package (HD03100 + HD03236 + HD0399) as unified fiscal story</li>
 <li><strong>SECONDARY</strong>: Youth crime law (HD03246) as social policy layer</li>
 <li><strong>CONTEXT</strong>: Migration inhibition (HD01SfU22) as legislative package supporting evidence</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster">Article Type: BREAKING (HIGH severity, multi-document cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster">Article Type: BREAKING (HIGH severity, multi-document cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Severity Score</strong>: 7+ on all top documents → GENERATE ARTICLE</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups">The 8 Mandatory Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-households">1. Citizens / Swedish Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--swedish-households"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups">The 8 Mandatory Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-households">1. Citizens / Swedish Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--swedish-households"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: DIRECT AND SIGNIFICANT</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Energy/fuel subsidies (HD03236)</strong>: ~5.2 million car owners benefit from lower pump prices; all households benefit from lower electricity/gas costs. Average Swedish household spends ~SEK 28,000/year on energy (2025 estimate).</li>
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-households">1. Citizens / Swedish Households<a cl
 <li><strong>Youth crime (HD03246)</strong>: Parents of young children welcome tougher deterrents; civil liberties advocates express concern.</li>
 <li><strong>Migration (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Majority supportive of stricter returns enforcement (SVT/Ipsos polls consistently show ~55-60% backing tough migration measures).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd">2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd">2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: STRONGLY SUPPORTIVE across all four measures</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>M</strong>: Owns economic narrative (inflation tamed), crime reform, energy competitiveness</li>
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd">2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)<a
 <li><strong>SD</strong>: Full-throated support for migration tightening (HD01SfU22) and youth crime (HD03246); energy subsidies for working-class base</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Coalition tension indicator</strong>: NONE significant. All four documents advance coalition priorities simultaneously.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: SPLIT by document, unified in critique framing</p>
 <ul>
 <li>
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-h
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: BROADLY POSITIVE</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Logistics sector</strong>: Fuel tax cuts directly reduce operating costs for Sweden's 30,000+ trucking companies</li>
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hid
 <li><strong>Tech sector</strong>: Public administration interoperability (HD03244) opens government data market</li>
 <li><strong>Forestry/agriculture</strong>: Active forestry regulation (HD03242) provides long-term planning certainty</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--ngos">5. Civil Society &#x26; NGOs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--ngos"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society--ngos">5. Civil Society &#x26; NGOs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--ngos"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: DIVIDED</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Rescue (Swedish Red Cross, Civil Rights Defenders)</strong>: Strongly oppose HD01SfU22 — ECHR compliance concerns</li>
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--ngos">5. Civil Society &#x26; NGOs<a class="" aria-h
 <li><strong>Environmental organizations (Naturskyddsföreningen)</strong>: Oppose fuel tax cuts (HD03236) as climate regressive</li>
 <li><strong>Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO)</strong>: Support energy subsidies for lower-income workers; concerned about unemployment</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu-context">6. International &#x26; EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu-context">6. International &#x26; EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu-context"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: MONITORING WITH CONCERN on migration</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EU Commission</strong>: Monitoring HD01SfU22 compatibility with EU returns directive</li>
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-international--eu-context">6. International &#x26; EU Context<a cla
 <li><strong>Nordic neighbors</strong>: Watching Sweden's migration model as template vs. own more liberal frameworks</li>
 <li><strong>European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg)</strong>: Potential future caseload from HD01SfU22 applications</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: ANALYTICAL/CAUTIONARY</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet (Law Council)</strong>: Will review HD01SfU22 and HD03246 for constitutional/ECHR compliance</li>
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutiona
 <li><strong>Migrationsdomstolarna (Migration Courts)</strong>: Operational burden increase from inhibition order appeals</li>
 <li><strong>SiS (youth institutions)</strong>: Warning signs about capacity; HD03246 increases their mandate without resources</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: HIGH ATTENTION, MIXED FRAMING</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mainstream media (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen)</strong>: Cover spring budget as top story; crime reform as Page 2</li>
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" ar
 <li><strong>International media</strong>: Sweden's crime wave coverage (NYT, Guardian) provides backdrop for HD03246 coverage</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Stress-test the dominant "election-sprint-works" narrative, surface wildcards, assign prior probabilities for Bayesian updating as forward indicators fire. All probabilities are analyst priors; see §Indicator Tripwires for update rules.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scenario-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scenario-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-18&#x3C;br/>Package tabled"]
 
@@ -849,8 +849,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p>Priors sum to ≈ 1.00. Probabilities will be Bayesian-updated as Lagrådet yttrande, Riksrevisionen response, SCB labour stats, SiS bulletins, and polling signals arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038">🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly Delivers" (P = 0.38)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038">🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly Delivers" (P = 0.38)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Riksrevisionen signals moderate concern but no adverse finding; Lagrådet yttrande flags rights issues on HD03246 (capacity) and HD01SfU22 (judicial review) but does not recommend withdrawal; SiS enters overflow via private contracts; coalition retains majority.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038">🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly De
 <li>HD01SfU22: first geographic-restriction orders issued; first NGO litigation filed; merits-stage only</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018">🔵 BULL — "Recovery Story Takes Hold" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018">🔵 BULL — "Recovery Story Takes Hold" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Inflation normalisation accelerates; Riksbank delivers two 25bp cuts in Q2–Q3 2026; unemployment falls below 8.0 % by Q3; US tariff environment moderates; coalition retains majority with an enlarged mandate.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018">🔵 BULL — "Recovery Stor
 <li>Post-election: moderate supply-side reforms become the 2026–2030 agenda</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022">🟠 MIXED — "S-led Minority, Package Re-scoped" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022">🟠 MIXED — "S-led Minority, Package Re-scoped" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Coalition loses majority but no left bloc majority emerges. S forms minority with confidence-and-supply from C and MP. Package is partially unwound on legal-risk dimensions.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022">🟠 MIXED — "S-le
 <li>Ukraine-support trajectory unchanged (cross-bloc consensus)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010">🔴 BEAR — "S+V+MP Majority, Rights-First Rebuild" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010">🔴 BEAR — "S+V+MP Majority, Rights-First Rebuild" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Left bloc gains absolute majority. HD01SfU22 repealed within first 180 days; HD03246 refocused on rehabilitation with SiS capital-investment package; HD03236 replaced with targeted energy-subsidy scheme.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010">🔴 BEAR — "S+V+
 <li>Riksrevisionen relationship strengthened (S-led govt uses audit as agenda-setter)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "Strasbourg Rule 39 Injunction" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "Strasbourg Rule 39 Injunction" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: ECtHR issues interim measure (Rule 39) against Sweden blocking implementation of geographic-restriction orders in specific cases.</p>
 <p><strong>Implications</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "St
 <li>Electoral impact: polarising — mobilises both base and opposition</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "SiS Capacity Crisis Pre-Election" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "SiS Capacity Crisis Pre-Election" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: A publicly reported SiS capacity-failure incident (e.g., youth transferred to adult facility, escape event, violence incident) within 90 days of election.</p>
 <p><strong>Implications</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD —
 <li>Electoral impact: net-negative for coalition (≈ 2–3 pp in polling swing)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules">📊 Indicator Tripwires (Bayesian Update Rules)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules">📊 Indicator Tripwires (Bayesian Update Rules)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules">📊 Indicator Tripwires
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Fires If</th><th>Prior Shift</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen verdict on HD03241</td><td>Adverse finding</td><td>F2 → 0.60; BEAR + MIX combined ↑ 0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on HD01SfU22</td><td>Recommends withdrawal</td><td>L3 → 0.35; WILD1 ↑ 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on HD03246</td><td>Flags SiS capacity as blocking</td><td>S3 → 0.35; MIX ↑ 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>SCB AKU unemployment (July 2026 report)</td><td>> 9.0 %</td><td>F3 → 0.30; BEAR ↑ 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>SCB CPIF (July 2026 report)</td><td>Annual &#x3C; 2.0 %</td><td>BULL ↑ 0.06</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Rule 39 request</td><td>Filed</td><td>WILD1 → 0.15; L3 → 0.30</td></tr><tr><td>SiS public incident</td><td>Major reported</td><td>WILD2 → 0.20; BEAR ↑ 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank reporäntan</td><td>Cut below 2.5 % by Aug 2026</td><td>BULL ↑ 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>M-bloc polling (August 2026 SVT/Ipsos)</td><td>&#x3C; 45 % total</td><td>E1 ↓ 0.15; E2 ↑ 0.10; E3 ↑ 0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-based-decision-recommendations">🎯 Scenario-Based Decision Recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-based-decision-recommendations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-based-decision-recommendations">🎯 Scenario-Based Decision Recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-based-decision-recommendations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-based-decision-recommendations">🎯 Scenario-Based Decisio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Role</th><th align="center">BASE (0.38)</th><th align="center">BULL (0.18)</th><th align="center">MIX (0.22)</th><th align="center">BEAR (0.10)</th><th align="center">WILDCARD (0.12)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Newsroom editorial</strong></td><td align="center">Lead with fiscal competence; sub-lead SiS capacity</td><td align="center">Lead with recovery story</td><td align="center">Lead with coalition pivot</td><td align="center">Lead with rights-first mandate</td><td align="center">Breaking news posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy analyst</strong></td><td align="center">Monitor Riksrevisionen + SiS monthly</td><td align="center">Model post-2026 supply-side reform</td><td align="center">Model HD01SfU22 repeal mechanics</td><td align="center">Model fiscal-rule redesign</td><td align="center">Model crisis-response protocols</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rights NGO</strong></td><td align="center">Plan merits-stage litigation</td><td align="center">Standby monitoring</td><td align="center">Plan legislative amendments</td><td align="center">Plan capital-investment advocacy</td><td align="center">Plan emergency response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Foreign ministries</strong></td><td align="center">Baseline Sweden posture</td><td align="center">Expect re-engagement on supply side</td><td align="center">Expect MIX partner tilt</td><td align="center">Expect rights-first re-alignment</td><td align="center">Expect crisis-driven volatility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--red-team-critique">🧪 Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-critique">🧪 Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>What could make this scenario tree wrong?</strong></p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Unmodelled shock from outside the Swedish system</strong> — e.g., Russia-related event reshaping campaign attention away from domestic package. Mitigation: monitor SÄPO bulletins; foreign-policy-salience tripwire.</li>
@@ -1053,14 +1053,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--red-team-critique">🧪 Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>Riksbank independence signalling</strong> — if the bank publicly resists coalition pressure, BULL scenario inflation narrative is politically usable only via a confrontation frame.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-1"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1139,16 +1139,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Document</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>Severity</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SiS capacity breach</strong> (youth detention overload)</td><td>HD03246</td><td>HIGH (80%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>Capital investment required</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ECHR challenge</strong> (migration inhibition orders)</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>MEDIUM (40%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Legal drafting precision</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal credibility loss</strong> (multiple extra budgets)</td><td>HD03236, HD0399</td><td>MEDIUM (35%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Fiscal framework adherence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral backfire</strong> (energy subsidies aid wealthy more)</td><td>HD03236</td><td>LOW (25%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Targeted supplementation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Youth recidivism increase</strong> (punishment without rehab)</td><td>HD03246</td><td>MEDIUM (50%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Rehabilitation component</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carbon pricing credibility</strong> (EU ETS compatibility)</td><td>HD03236</td><td>LOW (20%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>EU dialogue</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic recovery stall</strong> (external shocks, tariffs)</td><td>HD03100</td><td>MEDIUM (30%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Contingency fiscal plans</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Political crisis before election</strong></td><td>All</td><td>LOW (15%)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Coalition management</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis">Top Risk: Youth Detention Capacity Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis">Top Risk: Youth Detention Capacity Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Statens institutionsstyrelse (SiS) — which runs youth detention facilities — was operating at 100%+ capacity throughout 2025. The Skärpta regler proposition (HD03246) will increase the number of young people eligible for closed detention without a corresponding capital investment in new facilities. This is the most immediate operational risk in this legislative package.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr">Top Policy Risk: Migration Inhibition Orders (ECHR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr">Top Policy Risk: Migration Inhibition Orders (ECHR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr"></a></h3>
 <p>The replacement of temporary residence permits with inhibition orders for individuals facing deportation (HD01SfU22) creates significant litigation exposure. The European Court of Human Rights has consistently ruled that Article 3 (prohibition of torture/inhuman treatment) creates absolute obligations. Geographic restriction requirements and mandatory reporting could face challenges as conditions incompatible with human dignity if applied to vulnerable populations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence">Fiscal Risk: Spring Budget Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence">Fiscal Risk: Spring Budget Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has now submitted three fiscal adjustment instruments within two months: the spring proposition (HD03100), the amendment budget (HD0399), and an extra amendment budget (HD03236). While legally permissible, this frequency of budget adjustments signals fiscal policy uncertainty and may attract commentary from Riksrevisionen (Swedish National Audit Office) regarding adherence to the fiscal framework. Riksrevisionen's own report (HD03241) on the fiscal framework application provides a reference benchmark.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint">Overall SWOT: Kristersson Government's Spring Policy Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint">Overall SWOT: Kristersson Government's Spring Policy Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Inflation tamed: 2.84% (2024) vs 8.55% (2023)\n• Comprehensive legislative agenda shows competence\n• Coalition unity maintained across M+KD+L+SD\n• Energy subsidies demonstrate fiscal responsiveness"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Unemployment at 8.7% (2025) — highest since 2021\n• Multiple supplementary budgets signal fiscal instability\n• Youth crime laws lack evidence base (BRÅ)\n• Migration policy faces ECHR legal risks"]:::weakness
@@ -1159,8 +1159,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint">Overall SW
     style W fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style O fill:#0D47A1,color:#FFFFFF
     style T fill:#B71C1C,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-tables">Evidence Tables<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-tables"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-evidence">Strengths Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-tables">Evidence Tables<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-tables"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-evidence">Strengths Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-evidence"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-evidence">Strengths Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Inflation controlled</td><td>HD03100</td><td>World Bank: 2.84% (2024) vs 8.55% (2023)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative output high</td><td>HD03236, HD03246, HD03240</td><td>4+ propositions in single week</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition unity</td><td>HD03236, HD03246</td><td>Cross-committee approvals</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-evidence">Weaknesses Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-evidence">Weaknesses Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-evidence"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-evidence">Weaknesses Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Unemployment elevated</td><td>HD03100</td><td>World Bank: 8.7% in 2025</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Multiple mini-budgets</td><td>HD03236, HD0399</td><td>Third supplementary fiscal measure</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Youth crime evidence gap</td><td>HD03246</td><td>BRÅ research on deterrence</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-evidence">Threats Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-evidence">Threats Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-evidence"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-evidence">Threats Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Migration legal risk</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>ECHR Art. 3 absolute bar</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Youth detention crisis</td><td>HD03246</td><td>SiS reports 2025</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Economic external shock</td><td>HD03100</td><td>US tariff environment</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective">Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective">Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1281,9 +1281,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective">Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc p
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Details</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S Strength</strong></td><td>High unemployment creates natural attack platform; 8.7% = 450,000+ Swedes out of work</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S Weakness</strong></td><td>Cannot oppose cost-of-living relief (energy subsidies) without electoral cost</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S Opportunity</strong></td><td>Migration policy humanitarian angle; youth crime rehabilitation narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S Threat</strong></td><td>SD outflanks on crime and migration; hard to differentiate without alienating center voters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level">Overall Threat Level<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-level">Overall Threat Level<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1307,37 +1307,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level">Overall Threat Level<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Severity</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Rationale: Multiple simultaneous high-probability threats (legal challenge to HD01SfU22, SiS capacity crisis) combined with medium-probability systemic risks (electoral backlash, Riksrevisionen criticism, external tariff shock) produce an elevated aggregate threat posture with medium analytic confidence given dependence on external (ECtHR, US trade policy) variables.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stride-framework-application">STRIDE Framework Application<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-framework-application"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats">Spoofing (Identity/Authority Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-framework-application">STRIDE Framework Application<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-framework-application"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats">Spoofing (Identity/Authority Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Migration inhibition system (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Risk of individuals circumventing mandatory reporting requirements by using false identities. The lack of biometric requirement in some procedures creates vulnerability.</li>
 <li><strong>Condominium register (HD01CU28)</strong>: New identity requirements for property registration reduce this threat in real estate fraud.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats">Tampering (Data Integrity Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats">Tampering (Data Integrity Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Public administration interoperability (HD03244)</strong>: New data sharing requirements across government increase attack surface. Requires strong cryptographic protections.</li>
 <li><strong>Electronic submissions</strong> to Skatteverket: HD01CU28 enables electronic bouppteckning — introduces digital tampering risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats">Repudiation (Audit Trail Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats">Repudiation (Audit Trail Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax system (HD03236)</strong>: Complex subsidy/rebate systems historically vulnerable to VAT-style fraud. Requires robust audit mechanisms.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats">Information Disclosure (Privacy Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats">Information Disclosure (Privacy Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Migration inhibition orders (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Mandatory reporting and geographic restriction creates new government databases on vulnerable individuals — GDPR risk.</li>
 <li><strong>National condominium register (HD01CU28)</strong>: Property and ownership data aggregation — privacy advocates will flag risks.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats">Denial of Service (System Availability Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats">Denial of Service (System Availability Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SiS youth detention (HD03246)</strong>: Already at capacity; new law will increase demand by estimated 15-20% — actual capacity denial risk is HIGH.</li>
 <li><strong>Migrationsverket (HD01SfU22)</strong>: New administrative burden without stated resource allocation.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats">Elevation of Privilege (Constitutional Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats">Elevation of Privilege (Constitutional Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Youth crime law (HD03246)</strong>: Granting prosecutors broader discretion for juvenile detention may enable excessive use without sufficient judicial oversight.</li>
 <li><strong>Migration inhibition (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Geographic restriction orders issued by Migrationsverket without automatic court review — ECtHR may consider this insufficient procedural protection.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-matrix">Political Threat Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-matrix">Political Threat Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1388,19 +1388,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-matrix">Political Threat Matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Target</th><th>Probability</th><th>Countermeasure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legal challenge to HD01SfU22</td><td>ECHR applicants + NGOs</td><td>Migration policy</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Pre-emptive legal review by Lagrådet</td></tr><tr><td>Capacity crisis at SiS</td><td>HD03246 implementation</td><td>Youth detention system</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Capital investment, private partnerships</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral backlash on fuel cuts</td><td>S+MP opposition framing</td><td>Coalition voters</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Target rural voter messaging</td></tr><tr><td>Riksrevisionen criticism</td><td>HD03100/HD03236/HD0399</td><td>Fiscal framework credibility</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Adhere to surplus target</td></tr><tr><td>US tariff shock derailing recovery</td><td>External economic</td><td>Spring proposition forecast</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Trade diversification</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22">HD01SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD01SfU22 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-14 | <strong>Organ:</strong> SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet) | <strong>Typ:</strong> bet</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The Social Insurance Committee (SfU) proposed on April 14 that the Riksdag approve a government proposition replacing temporary residence permits for individuals facing deportation barriers with a system of "inhibition" (suspension of enforcement). Under the new regime, people who cannot be deported — because of risk of death, torture, or inhuman treatment in their country of origin — will no longer receive temporary residence permits but will instead have their deportation order suspended. They may also be required to report to Migrationsverket or police and confined to a geographic area.</p>
 <p>This is a significant tightening of Sweden's migration policy that fundamentally changes the legal status of approximately 2,000-4,000 individuals annually who fall into this category.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Tidö coalition mandate</strong>: The M+KD+L+SD government has systematically reduced migration pathways since 2022</li>
 <li><strong>SD influence</strong>: This reform bears the SD fingerprint of closing all alternative pathways to regular stay</li>
 <li><strong>Minister</strong>: Migration Minister Johan Forssell (M) is the political owner</li>
 <li><strong>Effective date</strong>: June 1, 2026 — just before the September election</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Closes perceived 'back-door' to residence\n• Strengthens return policy effectiveness\n• Aligns with EU returns directive framework"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Risk of stateless/limbo population growing\n• UNHCR likely to criticize\n• Creates humanitarian monitoring burden"]:::weakness
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a c
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Returns effectiveness</td><td>Removes incentive to receive TRP instead of leaving</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Human rights concern</td><td>ECHR Art. 3 absolute bar on refoulement</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Coalition cohesion</td><td>SD core demand; strengthens Tidö agreement</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: Litigation risk</td><td>European Court cases on similar frameworks</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1499,14 +1499,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeh
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Fulfills core immigration tightening agenda</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M, KD, L</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Coalition discipline + "orderly returns" narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Critical</td><td>Humanitarian concerns, institutional harshness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Fundamental rights violations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Contradicts refugee protection norms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UNHCR/ECRE</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>International refugee law concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Migrationsverket</strong></td><td>Mixed</td><td>More clarity on status, but new administrative burden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Affected individuals</strong></td><td>Severely negatively impacted</td><td>Loss of legal status, geographic restriction</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-score-6510">DIW Score: 6.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-6510"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-score-6510">DIW Score: 6.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-6510"></a></h3>
 <p>Significant migration policy affecting vulnerable population; politically salient ahead of elections; constitutional and human rights dimensions.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD03100 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-13 | <strong>Organ:</strong> Finansdepartementet | <strong>Typ:</strong> prop</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary-1">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2026 Spring Economic Proposition (Vårpropositionen) sets the fiscal framework for Sweden's 2026-2029 budget horizon. Presented by Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson, it establishes macroeconomic forecasts, spending priorities, and revenue projections that will guide Sweden through a critical pre-election period. With GDP growth recovering to 0.82% in 2024 (from -0.20% in 2023), unemployment at 8.7% in 2025, and inflation cooling to 2.8% in 2024 (from 8.5% in 2023), this proposition charts Sweden's path out of a dual economic contraction and inflation shock.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context">Analytical Lens 1: Macroeconomic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context">Analytical Lens 1: Macroeconomic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Key Economic Indicators (World Bank data):</strong></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>GDP Growth</strong>: 0.82% (2024), -0.20% (2023), 1.26% (2022) – recovery underway but fragile</li>
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context">Analytical Lens 1: Macroecon
 <li><strong>GDP per capita</strong>: $57,117 (2024) – slight recovery from $54,950 (2023)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political framing</strong>: Svantesson will argue recovery is on track under coalition management; opposition will counter that 8.7% unemployment is unacceptable and the extra budget (HD03236) undermines fiscal discipline.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Inflation controlled (2.8% 2024 vs 8.5% 2023)\n• Fiscal framework established\n• Recovery trajectory confirmed"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• 8.7% unemployment still high\n• GDP growth 0.82% - below EU average\n• Multiple supplementary budgets signal instability"]:::weakness
@@ -1562,7 +1562,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Inflation tamed</td><td>CPI 2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023</td><td>HIGH (World Bank)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Jobs crisis</td><td>Unemployment 8.7% in 2025</td><td>HIGH (World Bank)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Monetary easing</td><td>Riksbank rate cuts if inflation stays low</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: External shocks</td><td>US tariff risks, energy volatility</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1604,9 +1604,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Analytical Lens 3: Stake
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Social Democrats)</strong></td><td>Critical – argues unemployment too high</td><td>Jobs data supports criticism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M (Moderaterna)</strong></td><td>Supportive – owns inflation success narrative</td><td>Will cite CPI numbers</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td>Supportive – benefits from energy subsidies agenda</td><td>Fiscal expansion aligns with voter base</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Cautiously positive – stable framework, concern on labor costs</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Households</strong></td><td>Mixed – lower inflation positive, unemployment negative</td><td>8.7% unemployment = 450,000+ Swedes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksbank</strong></td><td>Monitoring for fiscal discipline</td><td>Critical of extra budgets</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score">Analytical Lens 4: DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score">Analytical Lens 4: DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 9.5/10</strong> – Spring Economic Proposition is the single most significant annual fiscal document in Swedish politics. It frames the entire year's political-economic debate and sets parameters for all other budget decisions, including HD03236, HD0399.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references">Analytical Lens 5: Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references">Analytical Lens 5: Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD0399</strong> (Vårändringsbudget): Sister document with specific expenditure adjustments</li>
 <li><strong>HD03236</strong> (Extra ändringsbudget): Energy/fuel subsidies that modify this framework</li>
@@ -1614,11 +1614,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references">Analytical Lens 5: Cross-Referenc
 <li><strong>HD03101</strong> (Årsredovisning för staten 2025): Financial accounts showing 2025 actuals</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD03236 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-13 | <strong>Organ:</strong> Finansdepartementet | <strong>Typ:</strong> prop</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary-2">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-2">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>The Kristersson government submitted a supplementary emergency budget (Extra ändringsbudget) for 2026 reducing fuel taxes and introducing electricity/gas price subsidies. Presented by Finance Minister <strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> with Financial Markets Minister <strong>Niklas Wykman</strong> as co-signatory on the revenue-measure components, this is a politically significant fiscal intervention responding to persistent cost-of-living pressures faced by Swedish households. Coming alongside the Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100 — also authored by Svantesson), this package signals the government's willingness to deploy fiscal tools to address energy costs ahead of the 2026 September elections.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context &#x26; Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context &#x26; Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Principal actors:</strong></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M) – Finance Minister; owner of the full spring fiscal package (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236) and lead presenter of this extra ändringsbudget</li>
@@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors">Analytical Lens 1: Polit
 <li><strong>Opposition</strong> (S, V, MP): likely to criticize fossil fuel tax cuts as environmentally regressive</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political motivation:</strong> The Tidö agreement (M+KD+L+SD coalition) faces electoral pressure from high energy costs. This supplementary budget serves dual purposes: (1) immediate consumer relief, (2) electoral signal of fiscal competence ahead of September 2026 elections.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Direct consumer relief on fuel/energy\n• Demonstrates fiscal responsiveness\n• Cross-coalition unity (SD, M, KD, L)"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Regressive (benefits car owners more)\n• Undermines Sweden's carbon tax system\n• Increases deficit pressure"]:::weakness
@@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Consumer relief</td><td>Fuel tax cuts directly lower pump prices for 5M+ car owners</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Fiscal cost</td><td>Supplementary budgets reduce fiscal space; deficit implications unclear</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Election positioning</td><td>Polls show cost-of-living as #1 voter concern entering 2026</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: EU coherence</td><td>Sweden committed to carbon pricing; tax cut contradicts climate targets</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1730,7 +1730,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1">Analytical Lens 3: Stak
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Rationale</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Social Democrats)</strong></td><td>Critical</td><td>Will argue it's regressive, helps wealthy car owners more</td><td>Opposition doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>Critical</td><td>Ideologically opposed to fossil fuel subsidies</td><td>dok_id: HD03236</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Direct contradiction of climate policy</td><td>Environmental mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Aligns with cost-of-living agenda</td><td>Tidö coalition partner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rural voters</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Higher car dependency, disproportionate fuel cost burden</td><td>Demographics</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Urban commuters</strong></td><td>Moderately supportive</td><td>Public transit alternatives exist</td><td>Partial dependency</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Industry (logistics)</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Lower operating costs for transport sector</td><td>Direct impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1767,14 +1767,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Inflationary signal to market</td><td>MEDIUM (30%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>EU carbon pricing credibility undermined</td><td>LOW (20%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Parliamentary defeat (unlikely with SD support)</td><td>LOW (10%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral backlash from green voters</td><td>MEDIUM (40%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact">Analytical Lens 5: Legislative Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact">Analytical Lens 5: Legislative Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Direct</strong>: Reduces revenue from fuel excise duties; provides credits/subsidies for electricity/gas consumption</li>
 <li><strong>Timeline</strong>: Budget changes take effect immediately upon Riksdag approval (Q2 2026)</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional</strong>: Standard budget amendment procedure; requires Finance Committee (FiU) approval</li>
 <li><strong>Precedent</strong>: Continues pattern of emergency energy subsidies started in 2022-23 during energy price spike</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election">Analytical Lens 6: Electoral Implications (2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election">Analytical Lens 6: Electoral Implications (2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Score: HIGH political salience</strong> – Cost-of-living is Sweden's top electoral issue</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition calculus</strong>: SD and M both benefit from this measure; L and KD accept as coalition discipline</li>
@@ -1782,11 +1782,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election">Analytical Le
 <li><strong>DIW Score: 8.5/10</strong> – Immediate fiscal impact affecting all Swedish households</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03246"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD03246 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-16 | <strong>Organ:</strong> Justitiedepartementet | <strong>Typ:</strong> prop</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary-3">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-3">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) submitted Proposition 2025/26:246 on April 16, 2026 — introducing stricter rules for young offenders (ages 15-17). This is one of the most significant criminal justice measures of the Tidö coalition, expanding punishment frameworks for juvenile crime in response to Sweden's gang-related youth violence epidemic. The proposition follows the government's comprehensive "Agenda för att stärka rättsstat och bekämpa brottslighet" and comes amid heightened public concern about shootings and gang recruitment of minors.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Actor:</strong> Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) is the political face of this reform.
 <strong>Coalition driver:</strong> Sweden Democrats (SD) and Moderates have jointly pushed for tougher juvenile justice since 2022.
 <strong>Electoral context:</strong> With September 2026 elections approaching, demonstrating crime-fighting credentials is core to coalition messaging.</p>
@@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1">Analytical Lens 1: Political C
 <li>Changes to the "ungdomstjänst" (youth service) system to increase deterrence</li>
 <li>Closer coordination between social services and judiciary for 15-17 year olds</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Addresses genuine public safety crisis\n• Cross-party support on tough crime rhetoric\n• Clear electoral mandate from 2022"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Research shows punitive approach fails young offenders\n• Social care system underfunded\n• Risk of EU/CoE criticism on juvenile rights"]:::weakness
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Public demand</td><td>70%+ of Swedes cite crime as top concern in polls</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Evidence gap</td><td>BROTTSFÖREBYGGANDE RÅDET (BRÅ) data shows punishment has limited deterrent effect for youth</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Crime reduction</td><td>Targeted early intervention reduces long-term criminal careers</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: Capacity deficit</td><td>SiS youth facilities at 100%+ capacity in 2025</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1901,13 +1901,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2">Analytical Lens 3: Stak
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Core Tidö agenda item; youth crime central to SD narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Justice Minister's flagship reform</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Family/law-order values alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong></td><td>Cautiously supportive</td><td>Concerned about rehabilitation component</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Mixed</td><td>Accepts toughness on crime but demands social investment parallel</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Believes social root causes must be primary focus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Advocates rehabilitation over punishment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Social workers/NGOs</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Fear punitive approach worsens outcomes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Police</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>More tools for persistent young offenders</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison">Analytical Lens 4: International Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison">Analytical Lens 4: International Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Denmark</strong>: Introduced similar youth crime crackdown 2020-21; mixed results — repeat offending unchanged</li>
 <li><strong>Norway</strong>: Prioritizes restorative justice; lower youth crime rates than Sweden</li>
 <li><strong>UK</strong>: Anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) largely failed; lesson for Sweden</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1944,10 +1944,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SiS capacity breach</td><td>HIGH (80%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR compliance challenge</td><td>MEDIUM (40%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Increased recidivism</td><td>MEDIUM (50%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral benefit materializes</td><td>HIGH (70%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-score-7510">DIW Score: 7.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-7510"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-score-7510">DIW Score: 7.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-7510"></a></h3>
 <p>Criminal justice reform with direct constitutional (rights) and welfare (children) dimensions, politically salient ahead of elections.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1978,8 +1978,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Situate Sweden's spring 2026 legislative package in international context. Sweden does not legislate in isolation — each reform is measured against comparable democracies' practice, institutional choices, and legal-risk outcomes.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">💰 Domain 1 — Fiscal Framework &#x26; Supplementary Budgets (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">💰 Domain 1 — Fiscal Framework &#x26; Supplementary Budgets (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2035,9 +2035,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Supplementary-budget frequency norm</th><th>Fiscal anchor</th><th>Independent audit body</th><th>Relevant 2025–2026 practice</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>2/year typical; 2026 = 3 mid-year instruments</td><td>Surplus target 1/3 over cycle</td><td>Riksrevisionen (HD03241 is reference)</td><td>Three mini-budgets in 8 weeks — outlier vs. own baseline</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 <strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>1/year norm</td><td>Balanced-budget rule (FinansPol)</td><td>Rigsrevisionen</td><td>Budget revision kept inside annual cycle</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 <strong>Finland</strong></td><td>2–3/year (standard practice)</td><td>Debt-ratio limit (~60 % GDP)</td><td>Valtiontalouden tarkastusvirasto (VTV)</td><td>Post-2024 consolidation on fixed expenditure ceilings</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 <strong>Norway</strong></td><td>1/year (Revidert Nasjonalbudsjett)</td><td>Sovereign-wealth fund rule (3 %)</td><td>Riksrevisjonen</td><td>Kept mid-year adjustments minimal</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 <strong>Germany</strong></td><td>0–2/year; high political cost</td><td><em>Schuldenbremse</em> (constitutional)</td><td>Bundesrechnungshof</td><td>2023–2024 Karlsruhe ruling reshaped supplementary-budget politics</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 <strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Budget review twice (Voorjaarsnota + Najaarsnota)</td><td><em>Trendmatig begrotingsbeleid</em></td><td>Algemene Rekenkamer</td><td>2025 Voorjaarsnota tightened rather than loosened</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236 together push Sweden above the typical Danish/Norwegian pattern and closer to the Finnish pattern of frequent mid-year adjustment. Riksrevisionen's own report on fiscal-framework application (HD03241) is unusual in timing — an active audit commentary coinciding with the government it is auditing.</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison">Electoral-Cycle Budget Cluster Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison">Electoral-Cycle Budget Cluster Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2073,8 +2073,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison">Electoral-Cycle Budget Clu
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: Electoral-sprint fiscal packages have a 50 / 50 historical track record. Fiscal-credibility critiques (like the UK 2024 case) are the dominant failure mode.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246">👮 Domain 2 — Youth Criminal Justice Reform (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517">Comparator Table — Juvenile-Offender Frameworks (ages 15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246">👮 Domain 2 — Youth Criminal Justice Reform (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517">Comparator Table — Juvenile-Offender Frameworks (ages 15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2137,18 +2137,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517">Comparator
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th align="center">Detention age-of-liability floor</th><th>Closed detention trend (2020–2025)</th><th>Rehabilitation / capacity investment</th><th align="center">Recidivism rate (18-month)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>↑ (HD03246 extends)</td><td>SiS at 100 %+ capacity 2025; <strong>no paired capital investment</strong> in HD03100</td><td align="center">~45 % (latest BRÅ)</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 <strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>Slight ↑</td><td>2024 youth-unit expansion programme</td><td align="center">~38 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 <strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>Stable</td><td>Preventive intervention emphasis</td><td align="center">~34 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 <strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>↓</td><td>Court-ordered treatment programmes</td><td align="center">~30 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 <strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">14</td><td>Stable</td><td>Jugendarrest + Weisungen hybrid</td><td align="center">~36 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 <strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">12 (adapted responsibility)</td><td>Stable</td><td>"HALT" pre-court diversion</td><td align="center">~32 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK / England</td><td align="center">10</td><td>↑ (overcrowding reported)</td><td>"Secure schools" programme (2022–)</td><td align="center">~47 %</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-1">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-1">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-1"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's HD03246 moves Sweden closer to the UK/England trajectory (toughening without proportionate capacity investment) and away from the Nordic / Dutch rehabilitation-anchored model (Denmark 2024 expanded capacity first).</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <p><strong>BRÅ-analogue research by Netherlands WODC and Norway KRUS consistently finds that deterrence-only reforms without rehabilitation investment increase 18-month recidivism by 3–6 pp. HD03246's implementation design, without paired SiS capital expenditure, matches the failed policy-cluster profile.</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations">Council of Europe / UN-CRC Observations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations">Council of Europe / UN-CRC Observations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>UN-CRC Concluding Observations on Sweden (2023)</strong> already flagged juvenile detention overuse. HD03246 will intensify reporting interactions.</li>
 <li><strong>CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture)</strong> Sweden report, 2024: SiS overcrowding cited as treatment-integrity risk. HD03246 worsens that vector absent capital response. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Venice Commission</strong> has not commented on HD03246 specifically (it is not constitutional); but Council-of-Europe soft law trends against rebuilding deterrence-only frameworks for minors.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22">🛂 Domain 3 — Migration Inhibition / Alternative-Return Schemes (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals">Comparator Table — Alternative Schemes for Deportation-Blocked Individuals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22">🛂 Domain 3 — Migration Inhibition / Alternative-Return Schemes (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals">Comparator Table — Alternative Schemes for Deportation-Blocked Individuals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2227,9 +2227,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individ
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Scheme name</th><th align="center">Geographic restriction?</th><th align="center">Automatic judicial review?</th><th align="center">Reporting obligation?</th><th>ECtHR / CJEU case law status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden (HD01SfU22)</strong></td><td>Inhibition-order system</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center"><strong>No</strong></td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Pending — structurally comparable schemes have lost</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td><em>Udrejsekontrollerede</em></td><td align="center">Yes (Udrejsecenter Kærshovedgård)</td><td align="center">Yes (automatic periodic review)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>M.K. v. Denmark</em> (2023) — scheme survived with judicial-review safeguards</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>Alternatives to detention</td><td align="center">No (light reporting)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Compatible</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>Restricted-freedom regime</td><td align="center">Yes (Ter Apel)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>A.B. v. Netherlands</em> (2020) — compatible with Article 3/5 with judicial-review</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td><em>Residenzpflicht</em> + <em>Duldung</em></td><td align="center">Yes (residenzpflicht)</td><td align="center">Yes (administrative court)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>Khlaifia analogues</em> — compatible with judicial oversight</td></tr><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK</td><td>Immigration bail conditions</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Strasbourg litigation ongoing but compatible structurally</td></tr><tr><td>🇮🇪 Ireland</td><td><em>Direct provision</em> + reporting</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Compatible</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇷 France</td><td><em>Assignation à résidence</em></td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes (JLD review)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>K.G. v. France</em> (2019) — compatible with JLD safeguard</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-2">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-2">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-2"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's HD01SfU22 is the only comparator scheme without mandatory automatic judicial review at the point of inhibition-order issuance. This is the single design feature that converts the scheme from ECtHR-compatible (Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, France) to ECtHR-exposed.</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary">ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary">ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2270,7 +2270,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary">ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary<a c
 <p><strong>Litigation pathway</strong>: NGO-supported test case → Migrationsöverdomstolen → ECtHR. Realistic time to first merits ruling: 24–36 months. A Rule 39 interim measure could compress timeline materially (see scenario-analysis WILD1).</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-domain-synthesis">📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-domain-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-domain-synthesis">📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-domain-synthesis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2305,11 +2305,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-domain-synthesis">📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Design Choice</th><th>Sweden (HD03100/HD03236/HD03246/HD01SfU22)</th><th>Closest Nordic Peer</th><th>Closest "Failed Policy" Peer</th><th>Verdict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election fiscal sprint</td><td>3 mini-budgets in 8 weeks</td><td>DK — 1/year</td><td>UK 2024 (credibility loss)</td><td>Cautionary mid-risk</td></tr><tr><td>Youth detention toughening without capacity</td><td>HD03246 + static SiS</td><td>DK 2024 (toughened WITH capacity)</td><td>UK secure schools</td><td>Risk-heavy</td></tr><tr><td>Migration inhibition without automatic judicial review</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>DK, NL, DE, FR all have it</td><td>None — unique outlier</td><td>High-risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-summary-finding">Summary Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-finding"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary-finding">Summary Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-finding"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's HD01SfU22 is the single outlier design feature in the package from an international-comparative perspective. The fiscal and youth-justice dimensions follow recognisable peer patterns, but the migration-inhibition scheme diverges from every comparable European scheme by omitting automatic judicial review at issuance.</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>If Sweden retains HD01SfU22 unamended and loses at Strasbourg (scenario WILD1), Sweden would be the first Nordic state to lose an ECtHR Article 5 §1(f) case on migration-inhibition architecture since Denmark's 2019 re-engineering of Kærshovedgård.</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected">🌡️ Index Positioning (Pre- vs Post-Package, Projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected">🌡️ Index Positioning (Pre- vs Post-Package, Projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2359,10 +2359,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected">🌡️ Index P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Index</th><th align="center">2025 Sweden score</th><th align="center">2026 projection (BASE)</th><th align="center">2026 projection (BEAR)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>V-Dem Liberal Democracy Index</strong></td><td align="center">0.88 (band: "Liberal democracy")</td><td align="center">0.87 (stable)</td><td align="center">0.86 (slight slip, migration-driven)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom House — Freedom in the World</strong></td><td align="center">100/100</td><td align="center">99/100</td><td align="center">98/100</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom House — Internet Freedom</strong></td><td align="center">89/100</td><td align="center">88/100</td><td align="center">87/100</td></tr><tr><td><strong>World Justice Project Rule of Law</strong></td><td align="center">0.85 (top-5)</td><td align="center">0.84</td><td align="center">0.82 (procedural-rights sub-score weakens)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RSF Press Freedom Index</strong></td><td align="center">rank ~4</td><td align="center">rank 4–6</td><td align="center">rank 6–8 (if KU33 narrow-interpretation also materialises — cross-run)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>OECD Fiscal Framework Compliance</strong> (internal)</td><td align="center">"Compliant"</td><td align="center">"Compliant with observations"</td><td align="center">"Non-compliant on surplus target"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-2"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-citation-sources">Citation Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-citation-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-citation-sources">Citation Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-citation-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>OECD Economic Surveys — Sweden</strong> (2024, 2025)</li>
 <li><strong>Riksrevisionen — Fiscal Framework Application Reports</strong> (2024, 2025; HD03241 2026)</li>
@@ -2378,9 +2378,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-citation-sources">Citation Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-matrix">Document Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-matrix">Document Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2443,7 +2443,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-matrix">Document Classification Matrix<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Policy Area</th><th>Political Valence</th><th>Ideological Driver</th><th>EU Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>Macroeconomic policy</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Fiscal conservatism + election spending</td><td>MEDIUM (Stability Pact)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget</td><td>Energy/fiscal policy</td><td>Right-populist</td><td>Cost-of-living relief + fossil industry</td><td>HIGH (EU carbon pricing)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Youth crime law</td><td>Criminal justice</td><td>Right-Conservative</td><td>Law and order, SD-aligned</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget</td><td>Fiscal policy</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Budget management</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Migration inhibition</td><td>Migration/asylum</td><td>Far-Right</td><td>SD core agenda</td><td>HIGH (EU returns directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Elsystemet laws</td><td>Energy policy</td><td>Center</td><td>Energy security, transition</td><td>HIGH (EU electricity directive)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 2026 legislative cluster represents a <strong>rightward acceleration</strong> in coalition policy as elections approach:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Criminal justice</strong>: Punitive turn on youth crime (HD03246) advances SD/M joint agenda</li>
@@ -2451,16 +2451,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">Governing Coalition Policy Vector<
 <li><strong>Energy</strong>: Fossil fuel tax relief (HD03236) prioritizes short-term consumer relief over long-term climate targets</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal</strong>: Spring proposition (HD03100) provides macro legitimacy cover for spending measures</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-conflict-lines">Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conflict-lines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conflict-lines">Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conflict-lines"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition vs. Opposition</strong>: All four measures have clear left-right fault lines.
 <strong>Coalition internal</strong>: L's liberal values create minor tension with HD03246 juvenile rights provisions and HD01SfU22 humanitarian concerns.
 <strong>Sweden vs. EU</strong>: HD03236 (fuel tax cuts) creates tension with EU's carbon pricing agenda; HD01SfU22 faces EU returns directive compatibility questions.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-classification">Historical Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-classification">Historical Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-classification"></a></h3>
 <p>This legislative sprint is analogous to the Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal expansion (anti-austerity during financial crisis) in its use of supplementary budget mechanisms — but with a more ideologically homogeneous direction (right-populist rather than centrist crisis management).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-dependency-graph">Document Dependency Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-dependency-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-dependency-graph">Document Dependency Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-dependency-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD03100\nVårproposition 2026\nFiscal Framework]
     B[HD0399\nVårändringsbudget\nExpenditure Changes]
@@ -2486,14 +2486,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-dependency-graph">Document Dependency Graph<a class="" aria-
     style C fill:#ff006e,color:#FFFFFF
     style F fill:#ff006e,color:#FFFFFF
     style G fill:#F57C00,color:#000000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-interdependencies">Key Interdependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-interdependencies"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">Budget Package Cluster (HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-interdependencies">Key Interdependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-interdependencies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">Budget Package Cluster (HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h4>
 <p>These three documents form Sweden's spring fiscal package. HD03100 sets the macro framework, HD0399 adjusts existing budget lines, and HD03236 adds an extraordinary measure (energy relief) outside the regular budget cycle. Together they represent the government's pre-election fiscal platform.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239">Energy Policy Cluster (HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239">Energy Policy Cluster (HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239"></a></h4>
 <p>Fuel tax cuts (HD03236), new electricity system laws (HD03240), and wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) form a coherent (if internally tensioned) energy policy agenda: reduce consumer costs in the short-term while building renewable capacity for the long-term.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22">Security/Justice Cluster (HD03246 + HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22">Security/Justice Cluster (HD03246 + HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22"></a></h4>
 <p>Youth crime law and migration inhibition orders both belong to the Tidö agreement's security agenda. Both are presented as "firmness" measures and both carry significant implementation risks (SiS capacity, ECHR compliance).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated">Previously Covered Documents (April 17 run - NOT duplicated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated">Previously Covered Documents (April 17 run - NOT duplicated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01KU32 (Press freedom TFF amendment)</li>
 <li>HD01KU33 (Search warrant public records)</li>
@@ -2507,10 +2507,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated">Previousl
 <li>HD03232 (Ukraine compensation commission)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>MCP Status:</strong> LIVE | <strong>Generated:</strong> 2026-04-18T17:10Z</p>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources-used">Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-used"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-riksdag-regering-mcp">riksdag-regering-mcp<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-regering-mcp"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources-used">Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-used"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-riksdag-regering-mcp">riksdag-regering-mcp<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-regering-mcp"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_sync_status()</code> → LIVE (generated_at: 2026-04-18T17:05:22Z)</li>
 <li><code>get_propositioner(rm: "2025/26", limit: 20)</code> → 272 propositions total, 20 fetched</li>
@@ -2521,14 +2521,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-riksdag-regering-mcp">riksdag-regering-mcp<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><code>get_dokument_innehall(HD03236)</code> → snippet only (fulltext_available: true)</li>
 <li><code>get_dokument_innehall(HD03100)</code> → snippet only (fulltext_available: true)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-world-bank-api">World Bank API<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-world-bank-api"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-world-bank-api">World Bank API<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-world-bank-api"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, GDP_GROWTH, 10)</code> → 2016-2024 data fetched ✅</li>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, INFLATION, 5)</code> → 2021-2024 data fetched ✅</li>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, UNEMPLOYMENT, 5)</code> → 2021-2025 data fetched ✅</li>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, GDP_PER_CAPITA, 5)</code> → 2021-2024 data fetched ✅</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-statistics-captured">Key Statistics Captured<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-statistics-captured"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-statistics-captured">Key Statistics Captured<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-statistics-captured"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2571,14 +2571,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-statistics-captured">Key Statistics Captured<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Latest Value</th><th>Year</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP Growth</td><td>0.82%</td><td>2024</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation (CPI)</td><td>2.84%</td><td>2024</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment</td><td>8.7%</td><td>2025</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>GDP per capita</td><td>$57,117</td><td>2024</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag documents (2025/26)</td><td>272 propositions</td><td>2026</td><td>riksdag-regering</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed-1">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed-1">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-1"></a></h3>
 <p>4 primary documents: HD03100, HD03236, HD03246, HD01SfU22
 Additional context: HD0399, HD03240, HD03239, HD03242, HD03241, HD03101, HD03220</p>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Freshness</strong>: Live data as of 2026-04-18T17:05Z — NO STALENESS WARNING</li>
 <li><strong>Completeness</strong>: Full metadata + summaries available for all primary documents</li>
 <li><strong>Fulltext availability</strong>: Available but not fetched (very large documents) — summaries used</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -2619,7 +2639,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:01.983Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:23.571Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html b/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html
index 6f09fb5439..aecc7e9bab 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Realtime Monitor 1705">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:02.166Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.734Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:02.166Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.734Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-18T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1705","description":"On 2026-04-13 – 16, the Kristersson government tabled a coordinated four-document pre-election sprint: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100, DIW 9.5) sets the macro frame, an extra supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:02.166Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1705","description":"On 2026-04-13 – 16, the Kristersson government tabled a coordinated four-document pre-election sprint: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100, DIW 9.5) sets the macro frame, an extra supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:23.734Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-realtime-1705-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -232,10 +232,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-18-1705</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or fiscal commentary based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs / 2 weeks / 2026-09-13 election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>On 2026-04-13 – 16, the Kristersson government tabled a coordinated four-document pre-election sprint: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100, DIW 9.5) sets the macro frame, an extra supplementary budget (HD03236, DIW 8.5) delivers fuel-tax cuts and electricity/gas subsidies to cost-of-living voters, Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer's youth-offender law (HD03246, DIW 7.5) toughens rules for 15–17 year-olds, and the SfU committee's migration-inhibition order (HD01SfU22, DIW 6.5) replaces temporary residence permits for deportation-blocked individuals.</strong> The package lands against a fragile macro backdrop — GDP growth just 0.82 % (2024) after −0.20 % (2023), unemployment at 8.7 % (≈ 450,000 people, 2025), inflation tamed to 2.84 % (2024 vs 8.55 % 2023). The most acute operational risk is the SiS youth-detention capacity crisis (already 100 %+ utilisation); the most acute legal risk is ECHR Article 3/5 exposure on HD01SfU22; the most acute fiscal-credibility risk is three mini-budgets in two months drawing Riksrevisionen commentary. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> · DIW rank 1 = HD03100</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition fiscal-credibility posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Fiscal Risk · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> BEAR scenario</td><td align="right">Before Riksrevisionen response on HD03241 (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ECHR / rights-NGO engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §Elevation of Privilege · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Migration</td><td align="right">Before HD01SfU22 enters force (target: June 2026)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03100 is the #1 story</strong> — Svantesson's vårproposition is the macro umbrella under which HD0399 (amendment budget) and HD03236 (extra budget) are being justified. Unemployment 8.7 % is the government's main attack surface. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>HD03236 (fuel + energy relief) is the electoral centrepiece</strong> — ~5.2 million car owners, all ~4.9 million household electricity customers benefit. S/V/MP cannot oppose on distributional grounds without electoral cost. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met</strong> — all four DIW ≥ 6.5 documents have dedicated article sections; HD0399 is cited inside HD03100. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance Minister)</strong></td><td>Vårproposition author</td><td>Political owner of the fiscal-competence narrative; Riksrevisionen exposure lands on her</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M, Justice Minister)</strong></td><td>HD03246 champion</td><td>Owns SiS-capacity implementation risk; BRÅ evidence-base critiques land on him</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M, Finance Minister) / Niklas Wykman (M, Financial Markets Minister)</strong></td><td>HD03236 fuel/energy budget architects</td><td>Coalition authors of cost-of-living measure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Forssell (M, Migration Minister)</strong></td><td>HD01SfU22 sponsor</td><td>Political owner of ECHR exposure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td>Package-level coordinator</td><td>Owns electoral framing; Tidö-agreement alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S, opposition leader)</strong></td><td>Labour-economics critic</td><td>Unemployment 8.7 % = her primary attack line</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</strong></td><td>Distribution critic</td><td>Energy-subsidy distributional critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Märta Stenevi / Amanda Lind (MP)</strong></td><td>Climate critic</td><td>Fuel-tax cut vs. EU-ETS / climate-target tension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</strong></td><td>Coalition-external partner</td><td>HD03246 + HD01SfU22 are SD core demands</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksrevisionen</strong></td><td>Independent audit</td><td>HD03241 fiscal-framework audit is the benchmark document</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional review</td><td>Expected pre-vote yttrande on HD03246 + HD01SfU22</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ECtHR (Strasbourg)</strong></td><td>Supra-national court</td><td>HD01SfU22 Article 3/5 litigation pathway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SiS (Statens institutionsstyrelse)</strong></td><td>Youth-detention operator</td><td>100 %+ capacity status is operational blocking indicator</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission (DG HOME)</strong></td><td>Returns-directive custodian</td><td>HD01SfU22 compatibility with Directive 2008/115/EC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-14-days--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-14-days--what-to-watch">🔮 Next 14 Days — What to Watch<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Late April 2026</td><td><strong>FiU betänkande</strong> on HD03100</td><td>First committee amendments — opposition fiscal-credibility attack crystallises</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on HD03246 + HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>ECHR / rights-of-child flags; capacity-funding flags</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026</td><td><strong>SCB labour-market statistics</strong></td><td>If unemployment ticks up from 8.7 % baseline, HD03100 narrative falters</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026</td><td><strong>Riksrevisionen response on HD03241</strong></td><td>If adverse → fiscal-credibility BEAR scenario activates</td></tr><tr><td>Jun 2026</td><td><strong>HD01SfU22 entry into force</strong></td><td>First geographic-restriction orders issued → ECHR litigation window opens</td></tr><tr><td>Jun 2026</td><td><strong>First NGO joint remissvar</strong> (Rädda Barnen, Amnesty Sweden, Asylrättscentrum)</td><td>Public record on ECHR compatibility</td></tr><tr><td>Q3 2026</td><td><strong>First SiS capacity bulletin post-HD03246 enactment</strong></td><td>Operational implementation risk materialises</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td><strong>Swedish general election</strong></td><td>Package's electoral ROI measured</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -456,26 +456,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>HD03100 scores 9.5; next is 8.5 — stable gap</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All 4 DIW ≥ 6.5 documents in article</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal-framework stress projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Three mini-budgets in two months is empirically documented</td></tr><tr><td>SiS capacity crisis projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>100 %+ utilisation publicly reported by SiS in 2025</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR litigation probability (HD01SfU22)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Near-certain filings; adverse ruling magnitude is the uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment trajectory (2026)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>External tariff environment is the dominant variable</td></tr><tr><td>Election outcome (Sep 13 2026)</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Still five months out; campaign dynamics can shift significantly</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md">Classification</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Coverage:</strong> April 13-18, 2026 | <strong>Documents analyzed:</strong> 4 primary</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h3>
 <p>This monitoring cycle captures a dense legislative period in the final weeks before Sweden's 2026 summer recess, featuring an unusually large cluster of government propositions submitted on April 13-16. The dominant theme is <strong>fiscal expansion meeting crime policy escalation</strong> — the Kristersson government has deployed four simultaneous fiscal instruments (spring proposition, amendment budget, extra budget, tax accounts) alongside two justice reforms, signaling an election-oriented policy sprint.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100">Top-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 9.5): Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100">Top-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 9.5): Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-ranked-finding-diw-score-95-spring-economic-proposition-hd03100"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's 2026 Vårproposition establishes a fiscal framework in a context of fragile recovery: GDP grew just 0.82% in 2024 after -0.20% in 2023, while unemployment remains at 8.7% (2025). Inflation has been tamed (2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023) but the jobs recovery lags. The proposition frames all other fiscal decisions in this cycle.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236">Second-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 8.5): Extra Supplementary Budget — Energy/Fuel Relief (HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236">Second-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 8.5): Extra Supplementary Budget — Energy/Fuel Relief (HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-second-ranked-finding-diw-score-85-extra-supplementary-budget--energyfuel-relief-hd03236"></a></h4>
 <p>An extraordinary supplementary budget combining fuel tax cuts with electricity and gas price subsidies represents a significant fiscal intervention. This politically motivated measure — coming weeks before the September 2026 Riksdag election campaign — benefits rural/suburban voters with high car dependency. Estimated cost: reduces state fuel excise revenue; offset partially by EU energy support instruments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246">Third-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 7.5): Stricter Youth Crime Law (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246">Third-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 7.5): Stricter Youth Crime Law (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-third-ranked-finding-diw-score-75-stricter-youth-crime-law-hd03246"></a></h4>
 <p>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer's proposition to tighten rules for young offenders (ages 15-17) advances the Tidö coalition's core crime agenda. With Sweden's youth gang violence continuing to attract international attention, this measure carries high political salience despite thin evidence of deterrent efficacy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22">Fourth-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 6.5): Migration Inhibition Order System (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22">Fourth-Ranked Finding (DIW Score 6.5): Migration Inhibition Order System (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fourth-ranked-finding-diw-score-65-migration-inhibition-order-system-hd01sfu22"></a></h4>
 <p>SfU committee approval of replacing temporary residence permits with inhibition orders for deportation-blocked individuals fundamentally tightens Sweden's migration system. Effective June 2026, this affects an estimated 2,000-4,000 individuals annually and carries significant ECHR litigation risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing">Cross-Cutting Theme: Election Posturing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing">Cross-Cutting Theme: Election Posturing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-theme-election-posturing"></a></h3>
 <p>All four major documents advance pre-election positioning: energy subsidies for cost-of-living voters, stricter crime laws for security voters, tighter migration for SD base voters. The spring proposition provides the macro cover for this spending.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -513,9 +513,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>DIW Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>9.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (fuel/energy)</td><td>prop</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>prop</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition av verkställigheten</td><td>bet</td><td>6.5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Methodology:</strong> DIW (Democratic Impact Weighting)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -642,22 +642,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Party Breadth</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>Defense</th><th>Crime/Social</th><th>Named Minister</th><th>Committee</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>8</td><td>+2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Svantesson</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>9.5</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (energy)</td><td>6</td><td>+2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Svantesson/Wykman</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>8.5</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga</td><td>5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>+2</td><td>Strömmer</td><td>JuU</td><td><strong>7.5</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>8</td><td>+2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Svantesson</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition av verkst.</td><td>5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>+1</td><td>Forssell</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>6.5</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Lann/Edholm</td><td>NU</td><td><strong>6.0</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Britz</td><td>NU</td><td><strong>5.5</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Kullgren</td><td>MJU</td><td><strong>5.0</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Avfallslagstiftning reform</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>—</td><td>MJU</td><td><strong>4.5</strong></td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-determination">Lead Story Determination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-determination"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-determination">Lead Story Determination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-determination"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>#1 DIW-ranked: HD03100 (9.5)</strong> — The Spring Economic Proposition 2026 is the year's defining fiscal document. Article title, meta description, and H1 MUST reference this document first.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-composite-coverage-decision">Composite Coverage Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-coverage-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-composite-coverage-decision">Composite Coverage Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-coverage-decision"></a></h3>
 <p>Generate breaking news article covering:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>PRIMARY</strong>: Spring budget package (HD03100 + HD03236 + HD0399) as unified fiscal story</li>
 <li><strong>SECONDARY</strong>: Youth crime law (HD03246) as social policy layer</li>
 <li><strong>CONTEXT</strong>: Migration inhibition (HD01SfU22) as legislative package supporting evidence</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster">Article Type: BREAKING (HIGH severity, multi-document cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster">Article Type: BREAKING (HIGH severity, multi-document cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-type-breaking-high-severity-multi-document-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Severity Score</strong>: 7+ on all top documents → GENERATE ARTICLE</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups">The 8 Mandatory Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-households">1. Citizens / Swedish Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--swedish-households"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups">The 8 Mandatory Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-8-mandatory-stakeholder-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-households">1. Citizens / Swedish Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--swedish-households"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: DIRECT AND SIGNIFICANT</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Energy/fuel subsidies (HD03236)</strong>: ~5.2 million car owners benefit from lower pump prices; all households benefit from lower electricity/gas costs. Average Swedish household spends ~SEK 28,000/year on energy (2025 estimate).</li>
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens--swedish-households">1. Citizens / Swedish Households<a cl
 <li><strong>Youth crime (HD03246)</strong>: Parents of young children welcome tougher deterrents; civil liberties advocates express concern.</li>
 <li><strong>Migration (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Majority supportive of stricter returns enforcement (SVT/Ipsos polls consistently show ~55-60% backing tough migration measures).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd">2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd">2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: STRONGLY SUPPORTIVE across all four measures</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>M</strong>: Owns economic narrative (inflation tamed), crime reform, energy competitiveness</li>
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-mkdlsd">2. Government Coalition (M+KD+L+SD)<a
 <li><strong>SD</strong>: Full-throated support for migration tightening (HD01SfU22) and youth crime (HD03246); energy subsidies for working-class base</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Coalition tension indicator</strong>: NONE significant. All four documents advance coalition priorities simultaneously.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: SPLIT by document, unified in critique framing</p>
 <ul>
 <li>
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmp">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-h
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: BROADLY POSITIVE</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Logistics sector</strong>: Fuel tax cuts directly reduce operating costs for Sweden's 30,000+ trucking companies</li>
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hid
 <li><strong>Tech sector</strong>: Public administration interoperability (HD03244) opens government data market</li>
 <li><strong>Forestry/agriculture</strong>: Active forestry regulation (HD03242) provides long-term planning certainty</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--ngos">5. Civil Society &#x26; NGOs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--ngos"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society--ngos">5. Civil Society &#x26; NGOs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--ngos"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: DIVIDED</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Rescue (Swedish Red Cross, Civil Rights Defenders)</strong>: Strongly oppose HD01SfU22 — ECHR compliance concerns</li>
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--ngos">5. Civil Society &#x26; NGOs<a class="" aria-h
 <li><strong>Environmental organizations (Naturskyddsföreningen)</strong>: Oppose fuel tax cuts (HD03236) as climate regressive</li>
 <li><strong>Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO)</strong>: Support energy subsidies for lower-income workers; concerned about unemployment</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu-context">6. International &#x26; EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu-context">6. International &#x26; EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu-context"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: MONITORING WITH CONCERN on migration</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EU Commission</strong>: Monitoring HD01SfU22 compatibility with EU returns directive</li>
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-international--eu-context">6. International &#x26; EU Context<a cla
 <li><strong>Nordic neighbors</strong>: Watching Sweden's migration model as template vs. own more liberal frameworks</li>
 <li><strong>European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg)</strong>: Potential future caseload from HD01SfU22 applications</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: ANALYTICAL/CAUTIONARY</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet (Law Council)</strong>: Will review HD01SfU22 and HD03246 for constitutional/ECHR compliance</li>
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional-bodies">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutiona
 <li><strong>Migrationsdomstolarna (Migration Courts)</strong>: Operational burden increase from inhibition order appeals</li>
 <li><strong>SiS (youth institutions)</strong>: Warning signs about capacity; HD03246 increases their mandate without resources</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: HIGH ATTENTION, MIXED FRAMING</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mainstream media (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen)</strong>: Cover spring budget as top story; crime reform as Page 2</li>
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" ar
 <li><strong>International media</strong>: Sweden's crime wave coverage (NYT, Guardian) provides backdrop for HD03246 coverage</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Stress-test the dominant "election-sprint-works" narrative, surface wildcards, assign prior probabilities for Bayesian updating as forward indicators fire. All probabilities are analyst priors; see §Indicator Tripwires for update rules.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scenario-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scenario-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-18&#x3C;br/>Package tabled"]
 
@@ -849,8 +849,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p>Priors sum to ≈ 1.00. Probabilities will be Bayesian-updated as Lagrådet yttrande, Riksrevisionen response, SCB labour stats, SiS bulletins, and polling signals arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038">🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly Delivers" (P = 0.38)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038">🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly Delivers" (P = 0.38)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Riksrevisionen signals moderate concern but no adverse finding; Lagrådet yttrande flags rights issues on HD03246 (capacity) and HD01SfU22 (judicial review) but does not recommend withdrawal; SiS enters overflow via private contracts; coalition retains majority.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--sprint-mostly-delivers-p--038">🟢 BASE — "Sprint Mostly De
 <li>HD01SfU22: first geographic-restriction orders issued; first NGO litigation filed; merits-stage only</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018">🔵 BULL — "Recovery Story Takes Hold" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018">🔵 BULL — "Recovery Story Takes Hold" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Inflation normalisation accelerates; Riksbank delivers two 25bp cuts in Q2–Q3 2026; unemployment falls below 8.0 % by Q3; US tariff environment moderates; coalition retains majority with an enlarged mandate.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--recovery-story-takes-hold-p--018">🔵 BULL — "Recovery Stor
 <li>Post-election: moderate supply-side reforms become the 2026–2030 agenda</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022">🟠 MIXED — "S-led Minority, Package Re-scoped" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022">🟠 MIXED — "S-led Minority, Package Re-scoped" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Coalition loses majority but no left bloc majority emerges. S forms minority with confidence-and-supply from C and MP. Package is partially unwound on legal-risk dimensions.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--mixed--s-led-minority-package-re-scoped-p--022">🟠 MIXED — "S-le
 <li>Ukraine-support trajectory unchanged (cross-bloc consensus)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010">🔴 BEAR — "S+V+MP Majority, Rights-First Rebuild" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010">🔴 BEAR — "S+V+MP Majority, Rights-First Rebuild" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Left bloc gains absolute majority. HD01SfU22 repealed within first 180 days; HD03246 refocused on rehabilitation with SiS capital-investment package; HD03236 replaced with targeted energy-subsidy scheme.</p>
 <p><strong>Key confirming signals</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear--svmp-majority-rights-first-rebuild-p--010">🔴 BEAR — "S+V+
 <li>Riksrevisionen relationship strengthened (S-led govt uses audit as agenda-setter)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "Strasbourg Rule 39 Injunction" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "Strasbourg Rule 39 Injunction" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: ECtHR issues interim measure (Rule 39) against Sweden blocking implementation of geographic-restriction orders in specific cases.</p>
 <p><strong>Implications</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--strasbourg-rule-39-injunction-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "St
 <li>Electoral impact: polarising — mobilises both base and opposition</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "SiS Capacity Crisis Pre-Election" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD — "SiS Capacity Crisis Pre-Election" (P = 0.06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: A publicly reported SiS capacity-failure incident (e.g., youth transferred to adult facility, escape event, violence incident) within 90 days of election.</p>
 <p><strong>Implications</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--sis-capacity-crisis-pre-election-p--006">⚡ WILDCARD —
 <li>Electoral impact: net-negative for coalition (≈ 2–3 pp in polling swing)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules">📊 Indicator Tripwires (Bayesian Update Rules)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules">📊 Indicator Tripwires (Bayesian Update Rules)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--indicator-tripwires-bayesian-update-rules">📊 Indicator Tripwires
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Fires If</th><th>Prior Shift</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen verdict on HD03241</td><td>Adverse finding</td><td>F2 → 0.60; BEAR + MIX combined ↑ 0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on HD01SfU22</td><td>Recommends withdrawal</td><td>L3 → 0.35; WILD1 ↑ 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on HD03246</td><td>Flags SiS capacity as blocking</td><td>S3 → 0.35; MIX ↑ 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>SCB AKU unemployment (July 2026 report)</td><td>> 9.0 %</td><td>F3 → 0.30; BEAR ↑ 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>SCB CPIF (July 2026 report)</td><td>Annual &#x3C; 2.0 %</td><td>BULL ↑ 0.06</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Rule 39 request</td><td>Filed</td><td>WILD1 → 0.15; L3 → 0.30</td></tr><tr><td>SiS public incident</td><td>Major reported</td><td>WILD2 → 0.20; BEAR ↑ 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank reporäntan</td><td>Cut below 2.5 % by Aug 2026</td><td>BULL ↑ 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>M-bloc polling (August 2026 SVT/Ipsos)</td><td>&#x3C; 45 % total</td><td>E1 ↓ 0.15; E2 ↑ 0.10; E3 ↑ 0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-based-decision-recommendations">🎯 Scenario-Based Decision Recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-based-decision-recommendations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-based-decision-recommendations">🎯 Scenario-Based Decision Recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-based-decision-recommendations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-based-decision-recommendations">🎯 Scenario-Based Decisio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Role</th><th align="center">BASE (0.38)</th><th align="center">BULL (0.18)</th><th align="center">MIX (0.22)</th><th align="center">BEAR (0.10)</th><th align="center">WILDCARD (0.12)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Newsroom editorial</strong></td><td align="center">Lead with fiscal competence; sub-lead SiS capacity</td><td align="center">Lead with recovery story</td><td align="center">Lead with coalition pivot</td><td align="center">Lead with rights-first mandate</td><td align="center">Breaking news posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy analyst</strong></td><td align="center">Monitor Riksrevisionen + SiS monthly</td><td align="center">Model post-2026 supply-side reform</td><td align="center">Model HD01SfU22 repeal mechanics</td><td align="center">Model fiscal-rule redesign</td><td align="center">Model crisis-response protocols</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rights NGO</strong></td><td align="center">Plan merits-stage litigation</td><td align="center">Standby monitoring</td><td align="center">Plan legislative amendments</td><td align="center">Plan capital-investment advocacy</td><td align="center">Plan emergency response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Foreign ministries</strong></td><td align="center">Baseline Sweden posture</td><td align="center">Expect re-engagement on supply side</td><td align="center">Expect MIX partner tilt</td><td align="center">Expect rights-first re-alignment</td><td align="center">Expect crisis-driven volatility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--red-team-critique">🧪 Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-critique">🧪 Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>What could make this scenario tree wrong?</strong></p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Unmodelled shock from outside the Swedish system</strong> — e.g., Russia-related event reshaping campaign attention away from domestic package. Mitigation: monitor SÄPO bulletins; foreign-policy-salience tripwire.</li>
@@ -1053,14 +1053,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--red-team-critique">🧪 Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>Riksbank independence signalling</strong> — if the bank publicly resists coalition pressure, BULL scenario inflation narrative is politically usable only via a confrontation frame.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-1"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1139,16 +1139,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Document</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>Severity</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SiS capacity breach</strong> (youth detention overload)</td><td>HD03246</td><td>HIGH (80%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>Capital investment required</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ECHR challenge</strong> (migration inhibition orders)</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>MEDIUM (40%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Legal drafting precision</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal credibility loss</strong> (multiple extra budgets)</td><td>HD03236, HD0399</td><td>MEDIUM (35%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Fiscal framework adherence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral backfire</strong> (energy subsidies aid wealthy more)</td><td>HD03236</td><td>LOW (25%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Targeted supplementation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Youth recidivism increase</strong> (punishment without rehab)</td><td>HD03246</td><td>MEDIUM (50%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Rehabilitation component</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carbon pricing credibility</strong> (EU ETS compatibility)</td><td>HD03236</td><td>LOW (20%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>EU dialogue</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic recovery stall</strong> (external shocks, tariffs)</td><td>HD03100</td><td>MEDIUM (30%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Contingency fiscal plans</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Political crisis before election</strong></td><td>All</td><td>LOW (15%)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td><td>Coalition management</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis">Top Risk: Youth Detention Capacity Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis">Top Risk: Youth Detention Capacity Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-youth-detention-capacity-crisis"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Statens institutionsstyrelse (SiS) — which runs youth detention facilities — was operating at 100%+ capacity throughout 2025. The Skärpta regler proposition (HD03246) will increase the number of young people eligible for closed detention without a corresponding capital investment in new facilities. This is the most immediate operational risk in this legislative package.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr">Top Policy Risk: Migration Inhibition Orders (ECHR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr">Top Policy Risk: Migration Inhibition Orders (ECHR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-policy-risk-migration-inhibition-orders-echr"></a></h3>
 <p>The replacement of temporary residence permits with inhibition orders for individuals facing deportation (HD01SfU22) creates significant litigation exposure. The European Court of Human Rights has consistently ruled that Article 3 (prohibition of torture/inhuman treatment) creates absolute obligations. Geographic restriction requirements and mandatory reporting could face challenges as conditions incompatible with human dignity if applied to vulnerable populations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence">Fiscal Risk: Spring Budget Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence">Fiscal Risk: Spring Budget Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-risk-spring-budget-coherence"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has now submitted three fiscal adjustment instruments within two months: the spring proposition (HD03100), the amendment budget (HD0399), and an extra amendment budget (HD03236). While legally permissible, this frequency of budget adjustments signals fiscal policy uncertainty and may attract commentary from Riksrevisionen (Swedish National Audit Office) regarding adherence to the fiscal framework. Riksrevisionen's own report (HD03241) on the fiscal framework application provides a reference benchmark.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint">Overall SWOT: Kristersson Government's Spring Policy Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint">Overall SWOT: Kristersson Government's Spring Policy Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Inflation tamed: 2.84% (2024) vs 8.55% (2023)\n• Comprehensive legislative agenda shows competence\n• Coalition unity maintained across M+KD+L+SD\n• Energy subsidies demonstrate fiscal responsiveness"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Unemployment at 8.7% (2025) — highest since 2021\n• Multiple supplementary budgets signal fiscal instability\n• Youth crime laws lack evidence base (BRÅ)\n• Migration policy faces ECHR legal risks"]:::weakness
@@ -1159,8 +1159,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-swot-kristersson-governments-spring-policy-sprint">Overall SW
     style W fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style O fill:#0D47A1,color:#FFFFFF
     style T fill:#B71C1C,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-tables">Evidence Tables<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-tables"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-evidence">Strengths Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-tables">Evidence Tables<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-tables"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-evidence">Strengths Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-evidence"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-evidence">Strengths Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Inflation controlled</td><td>HD03100</td><td>World Bank: 2.84% (2024) vs 8.55% (2023)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative output high</td><td>HD03236, HD03246, HD03240</td><td>4+ propositions in single week</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition unity</td><td>HD03236, HD03246</td><td>Cross-committee approvals</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-evidence">Weaknesses Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-evidence">Weaknesses Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-evidence"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-evidence">Weaknesses Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Unemployment elevated</td><td>HD03100</td><td>World Bank: 8.7% in 2025</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Multiple mini-budgets</td><td>HD03236, HD0399</td><td>Third supplementary fiscal measure</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Youth crime evidence gap</td><td>HD03246</td><td>BRÅ research on deterrence</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-evidence">Threats Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-evidence">Threats Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-evidence"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-evidence">Threats Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Migration legal risk</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>ECHR Art. 3 absolute bar</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Youth detention crisis</td><td>HD03246</td><td>SiS reports 2025</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Economic external shock</td><td>HD03100</td><td>US tariff environment</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective">Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective">Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1281,9 +1281,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-opposition-swot-s-led-bloc-perspective">Opposition SWOT (S-led bloc p
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Details</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S Strength</strong></td><td>High unemployment creates natural attack platform; 8.7% = 450,000+ Swedes out of work</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S Weakness</strong></td><td>Cannot oppose cost-of-living relief (energy subsidies) without electoral cost</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S Opportunity</strong></td><td>Migration policy humanitarian angle; youth crime rehabilitation narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S Threat</strong></td><td>SD outflanks on crime and migration; hard to differentiate without alienating center voters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level">Overall Threat Level<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-level">Overall Threat Level<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1307,37 +1307,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level">Overall Threat Level<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Severity</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Rationale: Multiple simultaneous high-probability threats (legal challenge to HD01SfU22, SiS capacity crisis) combined with medium-probability systemic risks (electoral backlash, Riksrevisionen criticism, external tariff shock) produce an elevated aggregate threat posture with medium analytic confidence given dependence on external (ECtHR, US trade policy) variables.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stride-framework-application">STRIDE Framework Application<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-framework-application"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats">Spoofing (Identity/Authority Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-framework-application">STRIDE Framework Application<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-framework-application"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats">Spoofing (Identity/Authority Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spoofing-identityauthority-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Migration inhibition system (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Risk of individuals circumventing mandatory reporting requirements by using false identities. The lack of biometric requirement in some procedures creates vulnerability.</li>
 <li><strong>Condominium register (HD01CU28)</strong>: New identity requirements for property registration reduce this threat in real estate fraud.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats">Tampering (Data Integrity Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats">Tampering (Data Integrity Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tampering-data-integrity-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Public administration interoperability (HD03244)</strong>: New data sharing requirements across government increase attack surface. Requires strong cryptographic protections.</li>
 <li><strong>Electronic submissions</strong> to Skatteverket: HD01CU28 enables electronic bouppteckning — introduces digital tampering risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats">Repudiation (Audit Trail Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats">Repudiation (Audit Trail Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-repudiation-audit-trail-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax system (HD03236)</strong>: Complex subsidy/rebate systems historically vulnerable to VAT-style fraud. Requires robust audit mechanisms.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats">Information Disclosure (Privacy Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats">Information Disclosure (Privacy Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-disclosure-privacy-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Migration inhibition orders (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Mandatory reporting and geographic restriction creates new government databases on vulnerable individuals — GDPR risk.</li>
 <li><strong>National condominium register (HD01CU28)</strong>: Property and ownership data aggregation — privacy advocates will flag risks.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats">Denial of Service (System Availability Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats">Denial of Service (System Availability Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denial-of-service-system-availability-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SiS youth detention (HD03246)</strong>: Already at capacity; new law will increase demand by estimated 15-20% — actual capacity denial risk is HIGH.</li>
 <li><strong>Migrationsverket (HD01SfU22)</strong>: New administrative burden without stated resource allocation.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats">Elevation of Privilege (Constitutional Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats">Elevation of Privilege (Constitutional Threats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-elevation-of-privilege-constitutional-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Youth crime law (HD03246)</strong>: Granting prosecutors broader discretion for juvenile detention may enable excessive use without sufficient judicial oversight.</li>
 <li><strong>Migration inhibition (HD01SfU22)</strong>: Geographic restriction orders issued by Migrationsverket without automatic court review — ECtHR may consider this insufficient procedural protection.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-matrix">Political Threat Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-matrix">Political Threat Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1388,19 +1388,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-matrix">Political Threat Matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Target</th><th>Probability</th><th>Countermeasure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legal challenge to HD01SfU22</td><td>ECHR applicants + NGOs</td><td>Migration policy</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Pre-emptive legal review by Lagrådet</td></tr><tr><td>Capacity crisis at SiS</td><td>HD03246 implementation</td><td>Youth detention system</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Capital investment, private partnerships</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral backlash on fuel cuts</td><td>S+MP opposition framing</td><td>Coalition voters</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Target rural voter messaging</td></tr><tr><td>Riksrevisionen criticism</td><td>HD03100/HD03236/HD0399</td><td>Fiscal framework credibility</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Adhere to surplus target</td></tr><tr><td>US tariff shock derailing recovery</td><td>External economic</td><td>Spring proposition forecast</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Trade diversification</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22">HD01SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD01SfU22 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-14 | <strong>Organ:</strong> SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet) | <strong>Typ:</strong> bet</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The Social Insurance Committee (SfU) proposed on April 14 that the Riksdag approve a government proposition replacing temporary residence permits for individuals facing deportation barriers with a system of "inhibition" (suspension of enforcement). Under the new regime, people who cannot be deported — because of risk of death, torture, or inhuman treatment in their country of origin — will no longer receive temporary residence permits but will instead have their deportation order suspended. They may also be required to report to Migrationsverket or police and confined to a geographic area.</p>
 <p>This is a significant tightening of Sweden's migration policy that fundamentally changes the legal status of approximately 2,000-4,000 individuals annually who fall into this category.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Tidö coalition mandate</strong>: The M+KD+L+SD government has systematically reduced migration pathways since 2022</li>
 <li><strong>SD influence</strong>: This reform bears the SD fingerprint of closing all alternative pathways to regular stay</li>
 <li><strong>Minister</strong>: Migration Minister Johan Forssell (M) is the political owner</li>
 <li><strong>Effective date</strong>: June 1, 2026 — just before the September election</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Closes perceived 'back-door' to residence\n• Strengthens return policy effectiveness\n• Aligns with EU returns directive framework"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Risk of stateless/limbo population growing\n• UNHCR likely to criticize\n• Creates humanitarian monitoring burden"]:::weakness
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a c
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Returns effectiveness</td><td>Removes incentive to receive TRP instead of leaving</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Human rights concern</td><td>ECHR Art. 3 absolute bar on refoulement</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Coalition cohesion</td><td>SD core demand; strengthens Tidö agreement</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: Litigation risk</td><td>European Court cases on similar frameworks</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1499,14 +1499,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeh
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Fulfills core immigration tightening agenda</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M, KD, L</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Coalition discipline + "orderly returns" narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Critical</td><td>Humanitarian concerns, institutional harshness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Fundamental rights violations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Contradicts refugee protection norms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UNHCR/ECRE</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>International refugee law concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Migrationsverket</strong></td><td>Mixed</td><td>More clarity on status, but new administrative burden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Affected individuals</strong></td><td>Severely negatively impacted</td><td>Loss of legal status, geographic restriction</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-score-6510">DIW Score: 6.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-6510"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-score-6510">DIW Score: 6.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-6510"></a></h3>
 <p>Significant migration policy affecting vulnerable population; politically salient ahead of elections; constitutional and human rights dimensions.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD03100 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-13 | <strong>Organ:</strong> Finansdepartementet | <strong>Typ:</strong> prop</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary-1">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2026 Spring Economic Proposition (Vårpropositionen) sets the fiscal framework for Sweden's 2026-2029 budget horizon. Presented by Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson, it establishes macroeconomic forecasts, spending priorities, and revenue projections that will guide Sweden through a critical pre-election period. With GDP growth recovering to 0.82% in 2024 (from -0.20% in 2023), unemployment at 8.7% in 2025, and inflation cooling to 2.8% in 2024 (from 8.5% in 2023), this proposition charts Sweden's path out of a dual economic contraction and inflation shock.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context">Analytical Lens 1: Macroeconomic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context">Analytical Lens 1: Macroeconomic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Key Economic Indicators (World Bank data):</strong></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>GDP Growth</strong>: 0.82% (2024), -0.20% (2023), 1.26% (2022) – recovery underway but fragile</li>
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-macroeconomic-context">Analytical Lens 1: Macroecon
 <li><strong>GDP per capita</strong>: $57,117 (2024) – slight recovery from $54,950 (2023)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political framing</strong>: Svantesson will argue recovery is on track under coalition management; opposition will counter that 8.7% unemployment is unacceptable and the extra budget (HD03236) undermines fiscal discipline.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Inflation controlled (2.8% 2024 vs 8.5% 2023)\n• Fiscal framework established\n• Recovery trajectory confirmed"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• 8.7% unemployment still high\n• GDP growth 0.82% - below EU average\n• Multiple supplementary budgets signal instability"]:::weakness
@@ -1562,7 +1562,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-1">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Inflation tamed</td><td>CPI 2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023</td><td>HIGH (World Bank)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Jobs crisis</td><td>Unemployment 8.7% in 2025</td><td>HIGH (World Bank)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Monetary easing</td><td>Riksbank rate cuts if inflation stays low</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: External shocks</td><td>US tariff risks, energy volatility</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1604,9 +1604,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Analytical Lens 3: Stake
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Social Democrats)</strong></td><td>Critical – argues unemployment too high</td><td>Jobs data supports criticism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M (Moderaterna)</strong></td><td>Supportive – owns inflation success narrative</td><td>Will cite CPI numbers</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td>Supportive – benefits from energy subsidies agenda</td><td>Fiscal expansion aligns with voter base</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Cautiously positive – stable framework, concern on labor costs</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Households</strong></td><td>Mixed – lower inflation positive, unemployment negative</td><td>8.7% unemployment = 450,000+ Swedes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksbank</strong></td><td>Monitoring for fiscal discipline</td><td>Critical of extra budgets</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score">Analytical Lens 4: DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score">Analytical Lens 4: DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-diw-score"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 9.5/10</strong> – Spring Economic Proposition is the single most significant annual fiscal document in Swedish politics. It frames the entire year's political-economic debate and sets parameters for all other budget decisions, including HD03236, HD0399.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references">Analytical Lens 5: Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references">Analytical Lens 5: Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD0399</strong> (Vårändringsbudget): Sister document with specific expenditure adjustments</li>
 <li><strong>HD03236</strong> (Extra ändringsbudget): Energy/fuel subsidies that modify this framework</li>
@@ -1614,11 +1614,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-cross-references">Analytical Lens 5: Cross-Referenc
 <li><strong>HD03101</strong> (Årsredovisning för staten 2025): Financial accounts showing 2025 actuals</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD03236 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-13 | <strong>Organ:</strong> Finansdepartementet | <strong>Typ:</strong> prop</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary-2">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-2">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>The Kristersson government submitted a supplementary emergency budget (Extra ändringsbudget) for 2026 reducing fuel taxes and introducing electricity/gas price subsidies. Presented by Finance Minister <strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> with Financial Markets Minister <strong>Niklas Wykman</strong> as co-signatory on the revenue-measure components, this is a politically significant fiscal intervention responding to persistent cost-of-living pressures faced by Swedish households. Coming alongside the Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100 — also authored by Svantesson), this package signals the government's willingness to deploy fiscal tools to address energy costs ahead of the 2026 September elections.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context &#x26; Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context &#x26; Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Principal actors:</strong></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M) – Finance Minister; owner of the full spring fiscal package (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236) and lead presenter of this extra ändringsbudget</li>
@@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context--actors">Analytical Lens 1: Polit
 <li><strong>Opposition</strong> (S, V, MP): likely to criticize fossil fuel tax cuts as environmentally regressive</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political motivation:</strong> The Tidö agreement (M+KD+L+SD coalition) faces electoral pressure from high energy costs. This supplementary budget serves dual purposes: (1) immediate consumer relief, (2) electoral signal of fiscal competence ahead of September 2026 elections.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Direct consumer relief on fuel/energy\n• Demonstrates fiscal responsiveness\n• Cross-coalition unity (SD, M, KD, L)"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Regressive (benefits car owners more)\n• Undermines Sweden's carbon tax system\n• Increases deficit pressure"]:::weakness
@@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-2">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Consumer relief</td><td>Fuel tax cuts directly lower pump prices for 5M+ car owners</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Fiscal cost</td><td>Supplementary budgets reduce fiscal space; deficit implications unclear</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Election positioning</td><td>Polls show cost-of-living as #1 voter concern entering 2026</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: EU coherence</td><td>Sweden committed to carbon pricing; tax cut contradicts climate targets</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1730,7 +1730,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-1">Analytical Lens 3: Stak
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Rationale</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Social Democrats)</strong></td><td>Critical</td><td>Will argue it's regressive, helps wealthy car owners more</td><td>Opposition doctrine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>Critical</td><td>Ideologically opposed to fossil fuel subsidies</td><td>dok_id: HD03236</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Direct contradiction of climate policy</td><td>Environmental mandate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Aligns with cost-of-living agenda</td><td>Tidö coalition partner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rural voters</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Higher car dependency, disproportionate fuel cost burden</td><td>Demographics</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Urban commuters</strong></td><td>Moderately supportive</td><td>Public transit alternatives exist</td><td>Partial dependency</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Industry (logistics)</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Lower operating costs for transport sector</td><td>Direct impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1767,14 +1767,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 4: Risk Assessment
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Inflationary signal to market</td><td>MEDIUM (30%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>EU carbon pricing credibility undermined</td><td>LOW (20%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Parliamentary defeat (unlikely with SD support)</td><td>LOW (10%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral backlash from green voters</td><td>MEDIUM (40%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact">Analytical Lens 5: Legislative Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact">Analytical Lens 5: Legislative Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-legislative-impact"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Direct</strong>: Reduces revenue from fuel excise duties; provides credits/subsidies for electricity/gas consumption</li>
 <li><strong>Timeline</strong>: Budget changes take effect immediately upon Riksdag approval (Q2 2026)</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional</strong>: Standard budget amendment procedure; requires Finance Committee (FiU) approval</li>
 <li><strong>Precedent</strong>: Continues pattern of emergency energy subsidies started in 2022-23 during energy price spike</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election">Analytical Lens 6: Electoral Implications (2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election">Analytical Lens 6: Electoral Implications (2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Score: HIGH political salience</strong> – Cost-of-living is Sweden's top electoral issue</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition calculus</strong>: SD and M both benefit from this measure; L and KD accept as coalition discipline</li>
@@ -1782,11 +1782,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-6-electoral-implications-2026-election">Analytical Le
 <li><strong>DIW Score: 8.5/10</strong> – Immediate fiscal impact affecting all Swedish households</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03246"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok-ID:</strong> HD03246 | <strong>Datum:</strong> 2026-04-16 | <strong>Organ:</strong> Justitiedepartementet | <strong>Typ:</strong> prop</p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary-3">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-3">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) submitted Proposition 2025/26:246 on April 16, 2026 — introducing stricter rules for young offenders (ages 15-17). This is one of the most significant criminal justice measures of the Tidö coalition, expanding punishment frameworks for juvenile crime in response to Sweden's gang-related youth violence epidemic. The proposition follows the government's comprehensive "Agenda för att stärka rättsstat och bekämpa brottslighet" and comes amid heightened public concern about shootings and gang recruitment of minors.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1">Analytical Lens 1: Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Actor:</strong> Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) is the political face of this reform.
 <strong>Coalition driver:</strong> Sweden Democrats (SD) and Moderates have jointly pushed for tougher juvenile justice since 2022.
 <strong>Electoral context:</strong> With September 2026 elections approaching, demonstrating crime-fighting credentials is core to coalition messaging.</p>
@@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-1-political-context-1">Analytical Lens 1: Political C
 <li>Changes to the "ungdomstjänst" (youth service) system to increase deterrence</li>
 <li>Closer coordination between social services and judiciary for 15-17 year olds</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     S["✅ STRENGTHS\n• Addresses genuine public safety crisis\n• Cross-party support on tough crime rhetoric\n• Clear electoral mandate from 2022"]:::strength
     W["⚠️ WEAKNESSES\n• Research shows punitive approach fails young offenders\n• Social care system underfunded\n• Risk of EU/CoE criticism on juvenile rights"]:::weakness
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-2-swot-analysis-3">Analytical Lens 2: SWOT Analysis<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength</strong>: Public demand</td><td>70%+ of Swedes cite crime as top concern in polls</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness</strong>: Evidence gap</td><td>BROTTSFÖREBYGGANDE RÅDET (BRÅ) data shows punishment has limited deterrent effect for youth</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong>: Crime reduction</td><td>Targeted early intervention reduces long-term criminal careers</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat</strong>: Capacity deficit</td><td>SiS youth facilities at 100%+ capacity in 2025</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2">Analytical Lens 3: Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1901,13 +1901,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-3-stakeholder-perspectives-2">Analytical Lens 3: Stak
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SD</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Core Tidö agenda item; youth crime central to SD narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Justice Minister's flagship reform</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Family/law-order values alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong></td><td>Cautiously supportive</td><td>Concerned about rehabilitation component</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Mixed</td><td>Accepts toughness on crime but demands social investment parallel</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Believes social root causes must be primary focus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Advocates rehabilitation over punishment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Social workers/NGOs</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Fear punitive approach worsens outcomes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Police</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>More tools for persistent young offenders</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison">Analytical Lens 4: International Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison">Analytical Lens 4: International Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-4-international-comparison"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Denmark</strong>: Introduced similar youth crime crackdown 2020-21; mixed results — repeat offending unchanged</li>
 <li><strong>Norway</strong>: Prioritizes restorative justice; lower youth crime rates than Sweden</li>
 <li><strong>UK</strong>: Anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) largely failed; lesson for Sweden</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1944,10 +1944,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytical-lens-5-risk-assessment">Analytical Lens 5: Risk Assessment
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SiS capacity breach</td><td>HIGH (80%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR compliance challenge</td><td>MEDIUM (40%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Increased recidivism</td><td>MEDIUM (50%)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral benefit materializes</td><td>HIGH (70%)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟡 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-score-7510">DIW Score: 7.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-7510"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-score-7510">DIW Score: 7.5/10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score-7510"></a></h3>
 <p>Criminal justice reform with direct constitutional (rights) and welfare (children) dimensions, politically salient ahead of elections.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1978,8 +1978,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Situate Sweden's spring 2026 legislative package in international context. Sweden does not legislate in isolation — each reform is measured against comparable democracies' practice, institutional choices, and legal-risk outcomes.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">💰 Domain 1 — Fiscal Framework &#x26; Supplementary Budgets (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">💰 Domain 1 — Fiscal Framework &#x26; Supplementary Budgets (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-1--fiscal-framework--supplementary-budgets-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2035,9 +2035,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Supplementary-budget frequency norm</th><th>Fiscal anchor</th><th>Independent audit body</th><th>Relevant 2025–2026 practice</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>2/year typical; 2026 = 3 mid-year instruments</td><td>Surplus target 1/3 over cycle</td><td>Riksrevisionen (HD03241 is reference)</td><td>Three mini-budgets in 8 weeks — outlier vs. own baseline</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 <strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>1/year norm</td><td>Balanced-budget rule (FinansPol)</td><td>Rigsrevisionen</td><td>Budget revision kept inside annual cycle</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 <strong>Finland</strong></td><td>2–3/year (standard practice)</td><td>Debt-ratio limit (~60 % GDP)</td><td>Valtiontalouden tarkastusvirasto (VTV)</td><td>Post-2024 consolidation on fixed expenditure ceilings</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 <strong>Norway</strong></td><td>1/year (Revidert Nasjonalbudsjett)</td><td>Sovereign-wealth fund rule (3 %)</td><td>Riksrevisjonen</td><td>Kept mid-year adjustments minimal</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 <strong>Germany</strong></td><td>0–2/year; high political cost</td><td><em>Schuldenbremse</em> (constitutional)</td><td>Bundesrechnungshof</td><td>2023–2024 Karlsruhe ruling reshaped supplementary-budget politics</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 <strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Budget review twice (Voorjaarsnota + Najaarsnota)</td><td><em>Trendmatig begrotingsbeleid</em></td><td>Algemene Rekenkamer</td><td>2025 Voorjaarsnota tightened rather than loosened</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236 together push Sweden above the typical Danish/Norwegian pattern and closer to the Finnish pattern of frequent mid-year adjustment. Riksrevisionen's own report on fiscal-framework application (HD03241) is unusual in timing — an active audit commentary coinciding with the government it is auditing.</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison">Electoral-Cycle Budget Cluster Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison">Electoral-Cycle Budget Cluster Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2073,8 +2073,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-cycle-budget-cluster-comparison">Electoral-Cycle Budget Clu
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: Electoral-sprint fiscal packages have a 50 / 50 historical track record. Fiscal-credibility critiques (like the UK 2024 case) are the dominant failure mode.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246">👮 Domain 2 — Youth Criminal Justice Reform (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517">Comparator Table — Juvenile-Offender Frameworks (ages 15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246">👮 Domain 2 — Youth Criminal Justice Reform (HD03246)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-2--youth-criminal-justice-reform-hd03246"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517">Comparator Table — Juvenile-Offender Frameworks (ages 15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2137,18 +2137,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparator-table--juvenile-offender-frameworks-ages-1517">Comparator
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th align="center">Detention age-of-liability floor</th><th>Closed detention trend (2020–2025)</th><th>Rehabilitation / capacity investment</th><th align="center">Recidivism rate (18-month)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>↑ (HD03246 extends)</td><td>SiS at 100 %+ capacity 2025; <strong>no paired capital investment</strong> in HD03100</td><td align="center">~45 % (latest BRÅ)</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 <strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>Slight ↑</td><td>2024 youth-unit expansion programme</td><td align="center">~38 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 <strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>Stable</td><td>Preventive intervention emphasis</td><td align="center">~34 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 <strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">15</td><td>↓</td><td>Court-ordered treatment programmes</td><td align="center">~30 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 <strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">14</td><td>Stable</td><td>Jugendarrest + Weisungen hybrid</td><td align="center">~36 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 <strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">12 (adapted responsibility)</td><td>Stable</td><td>"HALT" pre-court diversion</td><td align="center">~32 %</td></tr><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK / England</td><td align="center">10</td><td>↑ (overcrowding reported)</td><td>"Secure schools" programme (2022–)</td><td align="center">~47 %</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-1">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-1">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-1"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's HD03246 moves Sweden closer to the UK/England trajectory (toughening without proportionate capacity investment) and away from the Nordic / Dutch rehabilitation-anchored model (Denmark 2024 expanded capacity first).</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <p><strong>BRÅ-analogue research by Netherlands WODC and Norway KRUS consistently finds that deterrence-only reforms without rehabilitation investment increase 18-month recidivism by 3–6 pp. HD03246's implementation design, without paired SiS capital expenditure, matches the failed policy-cluster profile.</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations">Council of Europe / UN-CRC Observations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations">Council of Europe / UN-CRC Observations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-council-of-europe--un-crc-observations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>UN-CRC Concluding Observations on Sweden (2023)</strong> already flagged juvenile detention overuse. HD03246 will intensify reporting interactions.</li>
 <li><strong>CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture)</strong> Sweden report, 2024: SiS overcrowding cited as treatment-integrity risk. HD03246 worsens that vector absent capital response. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Venice Commission</strong> has not commented on HD03246 specifically (it is not constitutional); but Council-of-Europe soft law trends against rebuilding deterrence-only frameworks for minors.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22">🛂 Domain 3 — Migration Inhibition / Alternative-Return Schemes (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals">Comparator Table — Alternative Schemes for Deportation-Blocked Individuals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22">🛂 Domain 3 — Migration Inhibition / Alternative-Return Schemes (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-3--migration-inhibition--alternative-return-schemes-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals">Comparator Table — Alternative Schemes for Deportation-Blocked Individuals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individuals"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2227,9 +2227,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-comparator-table--alternative-schemes-for-deportation-blocked-individ
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Scheme name</th><th align="center">Geographic restriction?</th><th align="center">Automatic judicial review?</th><th align="center">Reporting obligation?</th><th>ECtHR / CJEU case law status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden (HD01SfU22)</strong></td><td>Inhibition-order system</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center"><strong>No</strong></td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Pending — structurally comparable schemes have lost</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td><em>Udrejsekontrollerede</em></td><td align="center">Yes (Udrejsecenter Kærshovedgård)</td><td align="center">Yes (automatic periodic review)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>M.K. v. Denmark</em> (2023) — scheme survived with judicial-review safeguards</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>Alternatives to detention</td><td align="center">No (light reporting)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Compatible</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>Restricted-freedom regime</td><td align="center">Yes (Ter Apel)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>A.B. v. Netherlands</em> (2020) — compatible with Article 3/5 with judicial-review</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td><em>Residenzpflicht</em> + <em>Duldung</em></td><td align="center">Yes (residenzpflicht)</td><td align="center">Yes (administrative court)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>Khlaifia analogues</em> — compatible with judicial oversight</td></tr><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK</td><td>Immigration bail conditions</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Strasbourg litigation ongoing but compatible structurally</td></tr><tr><td>🇮🇪 Ireland</td><td><em>Direct provision</em> + reporting</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td>Compatible</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇷 France</td><td><em>Assignation à résidence</em></td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes (JLD review)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td><em>K.G. v. France</em> (2019) — compatible with JLD safeguard</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-2">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-specific-finding-2">Sweden-Specific Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-specific-finding-2"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's HD01SfU22 is the only comparator scheme without mandatory automatic judicial review at the point of inhibition-order issuance. This is the single design feature that converts the scheme from ECtHR-compatible (Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, France) to ECtHR-exposed.</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary">ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary">ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2270,7 +2270,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-echr--eu-legal-exposure-summary">ECHR / EU Legal Exposure Summary<a c
 <p><strong>Litigation pathway</strong>: NGO-supported test case → Migrationsöverdomstolen → ECtHR. Realistic time to first merits ruling: 24–36 months. A Rule 39 interim measure could compress timeline materially (see scenario-analysis WILD1).</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-domain-synthesis">📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-domain-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-domain-synthesis">📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-domain-synthesis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2305,11 +2305,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-domain-synthesis">📊 Cross-Domain Synthesis<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Design Choice</th><th>Sweden (HD03100/HD03236/HD03246/HD01SfU22)</th><th>Closest Nordic Peer</th><th>Closest "Failed Policy" Peer</th><th>Verdict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election fiscal sprint</td><td>3 mini-budgets in 8 weeks</td><td>DK — 1/year</td><td>UK 2024 (credibility loss)</td><td>Cautionary mid-risk</td></tr><tr><td>Youth detention toughening without capacity</td><td>HD03246 + static SiS</td><td>DK 2024 (toughened WITH capacity)</td><td>UK secure schools</td><td>Risk-heavy</td></tr><tr><td>Migration inhibition without automatic judicial review</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>DK, NL, DE, FR all have it</td><td>None — unique outlier</td><td>High-risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-summary-finding">Summary Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-finding"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary-finding">Summary Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-finding"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's HD01SfU22 is the single outlier design feature in the package from an international-comparative perspective. The fiscal and youth-justice dimensions follow recognisable peer patterns, but the migration-inhibition scheme diverges from every comparable European scheme by omitting automatic judicial review at issuance.</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>If Sweden retains HD01SfU22 unamended and loses at Strasbourg (scenario WILD1), Sweden would be the first Nordic state to lose an ECtHR Article 5 §1(f) case on migration-inhibition architecture since Denmark's 2019 re-engineering of Kærshovedgård.</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected">🌡️ Index Positioning (Pre- vs Post-Package, Projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected">🌡️ Index Positioning (Pre- vs Post-Package, Projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2359,10 +2359,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-index-positioning-pre--vs-post-package-projected">🌡️ Index P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Index</th><th align="center">2025 Sweden score</th><th align="center">2026 projection (BASE)</th><th align="center">2026 projection (BEAR)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>V-Dem Liberal Democracy Index</strong></td><td align="center">0.88 (band: "Liberal democracy")</td><td align="center">0.87 (stable)</td><td align="center">0.86 (slight slip, migration-driven)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom House — Freedom in the World</strong></td><td align="center">100/100</td><td align="center">99/100</td><td align="center">98/100</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Freedom House — Internet Freedom</strong></td><td align="center">89/100</td><td align="center">88/100</td><td align="center">87/100</td></tr><tr><td><strong>World Justice Project Rule of Law</strong></td><td align="center">0.85 (top-5)</td><td align="center">0.84</td><td align="center">0.82 (procedural-rights sub-score weakens)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>RSF Press Freedom Index</strong></td><td align="center">rank ~4</td><td align="center">rank 4–6</td><td align="center">rank 6–8 (if KU33 narrow-interpretation also materialises — cross-run)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>OECD Fiscal Framework Compliance</strong> (internal)</td><td align="center">"Compliant"</td><td align="center">"Compliant with observations"</td><td align="center">"Non-compliant on surplus target"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-2"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-citation-sources">Citation Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-citation-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-citation-sources">Citation Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-citation-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>OECD Economic Surveys — Sweden</strong> (2024, 2025)</li>
 <li><strong>Riksrevisionen — Fiscal Framework Application Reports</strong> (2024, 2025; HD03241 2026)</li>
@@ -2378,9 +2378,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-citation-sources">Citation Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-matrix">Document Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-matrix">Document Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2443,7 +2443,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-matrix">Document Classification Matrix<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Policy Area</th><th>Political Valence</th><th>Ideological Driver</th><th>EU Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>Macroeconomic policy</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Fiscal conservatism + election spending</td><td>MEDIUM (Stability Pact)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget</td><td>Energy/fiscal policy</td><td>Right-populist</td><td>Cost-of-living relief + fossil industry</td><td>HIGH (EU carbon pricing)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Youth crime law</td><td>Criminal justice</td><td>Right-Conservative</td><td>Law and order, SD-aligned</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget</td><td>Fiscal policy</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Budget management</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Migration inhibition</td><td>Migration/asylum</td><td>Far-Right</td><td>SD core agenda</td><td>HIGH (EU returns directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Elsystemet laws</td><td>Energy policy</td><td>Center</td><td>Energy security, transition</td><td>HIGH (EU electricity directive)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 2026 legislative cluster represents a <strong>rightward acceleration</strong> in coalition policy as elections approach:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Criminal justice</strong>: Punitive turn on youth crime (HD03246) advances SD/M joint agenda</li>
@@ -2451,16 +2451,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">Governing Coalition Policy Vector<
 <li><strong>Energy</strong>: Fossil fuel tax relief (HD03236) prioritizes short-term consumer relief over long-term climate targets</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal</strong>: Spring proposition (HD03100) provides macro legitimacy cover for spending measures</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-conflict-lines">Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conflict-lines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conflict-lines">Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conflict-lines"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition vs. Opposition</strong>: All four measures have clear left-right fault lines.
 <strong>Coalition internal</strong>: L's liberal values create minor tension with HD03246 juvenile rights provisions and HD01SfU22 humanitarian concerns.
 <strong>Sweden vs. EU</strong>: HD03236 (fuel tax cuts) creates tension with EU's carbon pricing agenda; HD01SfU22 faces EU returns directive compatibility questions.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-classification">Historical Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-classification">Historical Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-classification"></a></h3>
 <p>This legislative sprint is analogous to the Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal expansion (anti-austerity during financial crisis) in its use of supplementary budget mechanisms — but with a more ideologically homogeneous direction (right-populist rather than centrist crisis management).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>Date:</strong> 2026-04-18</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-dependency-graph">Document Dependency Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-dependency-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-dependency-graph">Document Dependency Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-dependency-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD03100\nVårproposition 2026\nFiscal Framework]
     B[HD0399\nVårändringsbudget\nExpenditure Changes]
@@ -2486,14 +2486,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-dependency-graph">Document Dependency Graph<a class="" aria-
     style C fill:#ff006e,color:#FFFFFF
     style F fill:#ff006e,color:#FFFFFF
     style G fill:#F57C00,color:#000000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-interdependencies">Key Interdependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-interdependencies"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">Budget Package Cluster (HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-interdependencies">Key Interdependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-interdependencies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236">Budget Package Cluster (HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-package-cluster-hd03100--hd0399--hd03236"></a></h4>
 <p>These three documents form Sweden's spring fiscal package. HD03100 sets the macro framework, HD0399 adjusts existing budget lines, and HD03236 adds an extraordinary measure (energy relief) outside the regular budget cycle. Together they represent the government's pre-election fiscal platform.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239">Energy Policy Cluster (HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239">Energy Policy Cluster (HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-cluster-hd03236--hd03240--hd03239"></a></h4>
 <p>Fuel tax cuts (HD03236), new electricity system laws (HD03240), and wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) form a coherent (if internally tensioned) energy policy agenda: reduce consumer costs in the short-term while building renewable capacity for the long-term.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22">Security/Justice Cluster (HD03246 + HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22">Security/Justice Cluster (HD03246 + HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-securityjustice-cluster-hd03246--hd01sfu22"></a></h4>
 <p>Youth crime law and migration inhibition orders both belong to the Tidö agreement's security agenda. Both are presented as "firmness" measures and both carry significant implementation risks (SiS capacity, ECHR compliance).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated">Previously Covered Documents (April 17 run - NOT duplicated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated">Previously Covered Documents (April 17 run - NOT duplicated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01KU32 (Press freedom TFF amendment)</li>
 <li>HD01KU33 (Search warrant public records)</li>
@@ -2507,10 +2507,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-previously-covered-documents-april-17-run---not-duplicated">Previousl
 <li>HD03232 (Ukraine compensation commission)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis run:</strong> realtime-1705 | <strong>MCP Status:</strong> LIVE | <strong>Generated:</strong> 2026-04-18T17:10Z</p>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources-used">Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-used"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-riksdag-regering-mcp">riksdag-regering-mcp<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-regering-mcp"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources-used">Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-used"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-riksdag-regering-mcp">riksdag-regering-mcp<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-regering-mcp"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_sync_status()</code> → LIVE (generated_at: 2026-04-18T17:05:22Z)</li>
 <li><code>get_propositioner(rm: "2025/26", limit: 20)</code> → 272 propositions total, 20 fetched</li>
@@ -2521,14 +2521,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-riksdag-regering-mcp">riksdag-regering-mcp<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><code>get_dokument_innehall(HD03236)</code> → snippet only (fulltext_available: true)</li>
 <li><code>get_dokument_innehall(HD03100)</code> → snippet only (fulltext_available: true)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-world-bank-api">World Bank API<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-world-bank-api"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-world-bank-api">World Bank API<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-world-bank-api"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, GDP_GROWTH, 10)</code> → 2016-2024 data fetched ✅</li>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, INFLATION, 5)</code> → 2021-2024 data fetched ✅</li>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, UNEMPLOYMENT, 5)</code> → 2021-2025 data fetched ✅</li>
 <li><code>get-economic-data(SE, GDP_PER_CAPITA, 5)</code> → 2021-2024 data fetched ✅</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-statistics-captured">Key Statistics Captured<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-statistics-captured"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-statistics-captured">Key Statistics Captured<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-statistics-captured"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2571,14 +2571,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-statistics-captured">Key Statistics Captured<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Latest Value</th><th>Year</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP Growth</td><td>0.82%</td><td>2024</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation (CPI)</td><td>2.84%</td><td>2024</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment</td><td>8.7%</td><td>2025</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>GDP per capita</td><td>$57,117</td><td>2024</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag documents (2025/26)</td><td>272 propositions</td><td>2026</td><td>riksdag-regering</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed-1">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed-1">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-1"></a></h3>
 <p>4 primary documents: HD03100, HD03236, HD03246, HD01SfU22
 Additional context: HD0399, HD03240, HD03239, HD03242, HD03241, HD03101, HD03220</p>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Freshness</strong>: Live data as of 2026-04-18T17:05Z — NO STALENESS WARNING</li>
 <li><strong>Completeness</strong>: Full metadata + summaries available for all primary documents</li>
 <li><strong>Fulltext availability</strong>: Available but not fetched (very large documents) — summaries used</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -2619,7 +2639,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:02.166Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:23.734Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html b/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html
index 3c2799b1cc..fad95506a4 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Riksdag Week 16, 2026">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:02.332Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.885Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:02.332Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:23.885Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-18T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Week 16, 2026","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:02.332Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Week 16, 2026","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:23.885Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -235,12 +235,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 4 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision based on Week 16 (2026-04-11 → 2026-04-17)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs · 30 days · post-Sep 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Author</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent, James Pether Sörling editorial responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 Rules 0–8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Sweden's Riksdag delivered the most consequential legislative week of the 2025/26 spring term.</strong> PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled a Spring Fiscal Trilogy (Vårproposition <code>HD03100</code> + Vårändringsbudget <code>HD0399</code> + Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code> — fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) into a backdrop of 0.82 % 2024 GDP growth (vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 %; World Bank) and 8.7 % 2025 unemployment, the highest since the pandemic. <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet</strong> simultaneously advanced two <strong>grundlag amendments</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> digital-evidence search/seizure) — the first substantive narrowing of <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) in years; because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the <strong>September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency</strong>. <strong>Foreign Minister (Utrikesminister) Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and Kristersson tabled Sweden's accession to the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> (<code>HD03231</code>) and the <strong>International Compensation Commission</strong> (<code>HD03232</code>) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg, with Sweden as founding member. The chamber confirmed the Tidöavtalet's working majority on <strong>JuU15</strong> (juvenile-offender tightening, <strong>145–142</strong>) — pure bloc vote, three-vote margin, the thinnest functional majority of the spring term. <strong>HD01UFöU3</strong> authorised 1,200 Swedish troops to Finland under NATO eFP — the first major operational expression of NATO membership. The cluster reveals a <strong>coordinated pre-election legislative sprint</strong> across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, fiscal stimulus, criminal-justice tightening, housing-market integrity, and energy reform. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong> for Week-16 print + digital</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Five-Dimension Scoring — Spring Fiscal Trilogy weighted <strong>10.0</strong> ⇒ lead; KU33 weighted <strong>9.80</strong> ⇒ co-prominent</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO + foreign-policy commentariat engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 + R6 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> S4 × T1 TOWS</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-posture + ECHR-litigation threat monitoring</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T1 + T3 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R1 + R3</td><td align="right">Continuous; heightened post-2026-04-22</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The lead story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236). Fuel-tax cut (82 öre / litre); el/gas relief; Vårproposition reaffirms försvarsanslag glide-path. SEK 60 B+ net stimulus. The <strong>economic-stewardship axis</strong> of the 2026 campaign turns on Q3 2026 macro data. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>The democratic-infrastructure story is KU33</strong> (HD01KU33). Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong>. Two-reading rule embeds the second reading in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met</strong>: all 14 documents with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 receive dedicated H3 sections in the published article (per <code>significance-scoring.md</code> coverage gate). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader, Ukraine + budget co-signatory</td><td>Political owner of fiscal trilogy + foreign-policy package</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, Finance Minister)</td><td>Architect of Vårproposition + Extra ändringsbudget</td><td>Fiscal credibility custodian; Q3 2026 macro = legacy variable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, Foreign Minister / Utrikesminister)</td><td>Tribunal architect</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; norm-entrepreneurship capital since NATO accession</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, Justice Minister)</td><td>KU33 + JuU15 owner</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation; juvenile-offender execution responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson</strong> (M, Defence Minister)</td><td>NATO eFP owner</td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deployment 2026-Q3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, party leader)</td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Position on KU33 will decide second-reading coalition; counter-budget construction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong> (S, finance spokesman)</td><td>S budget critique architect</td><td>Counter-budget arithmetic + cost-of-living narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader, Labour Minister)</td><td>Coalition partner most press-freedom &#x26; migration sensitive</td><td>Watch for liberal-identity friction on KU33 + migration trio</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong> (KD, party leader, Energy Minister)</td><td>KD law-and-order alignment</td><td>Underwrites JuU15 + KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong> (SD, party leader)</td><td>Parliamentary support kingmaker</td><td>145–142 leverage; migration trio political owner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, party leader)</td><td>V leader</td><td>Campaign voice against KU33 + migration trio + budget</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>MP leader</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong> (C, party leader)</td><td>Centre-bloc swing</td><td>Migration counter-motion architect; budget alternative custodian</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Collective)</td><td>Constitutional review body</td><td>Pending KU33/KU32 yttrande = single most consequential upcoming signal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong> (Ukraine President)</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 2025 co-signatory</td><td>Tribunal political guarantor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Försvarsmakten ÖB Micael Bydén</strong></td><td>Operational owner for eFP deployment</td><td>Bn-task-group readiness Q3 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers">🔮 Next 30 Days — What to Watch (with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers">🔮 Next 30 Days — What to Watch (with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers">🔮 Next 30 Days — Wha
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong> (scheduled)</td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on Extra ändringsbudget (HD03236)</td><td>Confirms (or stresses) fiscal-package coherence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-27</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>First political-accountability drumbeat of post-Easter cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026 (April–June)</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict language ⇒ R2 ↓ 4; silent ⇒ R2 ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>May–June 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote (vilande beslut)</strong> on KU33/KU32 first reading</td><td>First-reading confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>Late May / June 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote on HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Tribunal + reparations accession</td></tr><tr><td>2026-Q3</td><td>Försvarsmakten deploys Bn-task-group to Finland</td><td>First operational NATO posture milestone</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td><strong>V + C + MP file ECHR challenge on inhibition orders</strong></td><td>Migration-trio durability test</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous (heightened)</td><td><strong>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins</strong></td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators (R1 monitoring)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Swedish general election</td><td>Post-election composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects (<code>scenario-analysis.md</code> priors)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from <cod
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare retaliation</strong> post-tribunal + NATO eFP</td><td align="center">18 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td><td>SÄPO/MSB heightened posture; Nordic-Baltic intel-sharing; civil-society resilience</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> (interpretive frontier)</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO remissvar; statutory clarity in 2nd reading</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Migration trio ECHR strike-down</strong></td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Government legal review; appeal-mechanism build-out; UNHCR consultation discipline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-3-opportunities">🎯 Top-3 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-3-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-opportunities">🎯 Top-3 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-3-opportunities">🎯 Top-3 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneurship dividend</strong> from Ukraine tribunal — Sweden positions as Nordic accountability leader</td><td>HD03231 + Council of Europe framework</td><td align="center">Decadal</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Cross-party constitutional statesmanship</strong> on KU33 if S leadership endorses Norway-style statutory triggers (<code>comparative-international.md</code> §Nordic models)</td><td>HD01KU33 + Lagrådet review</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>Coalition-stability narrative</strong> if JuU15 is followed by Q2/Q3 fiscal-package execution without further close votes</td><td>Voteringsregister + macro indicators</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -547,12 +547,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW + immediate-impact balance)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>Sensitivity analysis confirms top rank under 5 plausible weight variations</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>All 11 documents with weighted ≥ 7.0 covered as dedicated H3 sections</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>JuU15 = operationally validated; other patterns established</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party second-reading vote projection (KU33)</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on Sep 2026 election outcome — three plausible coalition compositions</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP + tribunal; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US administration tribunal cooperation</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; shift possible</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR ruling on migration trio</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Counter-motion text shows preparedness; Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md">Data Manifest</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -604,10 +604,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SYN-ID</strong></td><td>SYN-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>weekly-review-2026-04-18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17 (Riksmöte 2025/26)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent (Copilot Sonnet 4.x)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodologies Applied</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8) · DIW v1.0 · TOWS · Attack-Tree · Kill Chain · Bayesian · ACH · Scenario Analysis · Comparative Politics</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>get_propositioner</code> · <code>get_betankanden</code> · <code>get_motioner</code> · <code>search_dokument</code> · <code>search_voteringar</code> · <code>search_anforanden</code> · <code>search_regering</code> · <code>get_g0v_document_content</code> · World Bank GDP/unemployment series</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Tracked</strong></td><td>23 high-significance documents (top of ≈150 in weekly catalog)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Persisted in <code>documents/</code></strong></td><td>11 dok files + <code>economic-data.json</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong> for fiscal package + KU constitutional package + Ukraine; 🟩 HIGH for migration trio; 🟧 MEDIUM for prospective coalition trajectory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-25 (next review event-driven)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdag Week 16 (2026‑04‑11 → 2026‑04‑17) was the most legislatively consequential week of the 2025/26 spring term and one of the densest pre-election weeks in a decade. The Kristersson government tabled a <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> — Vårproposition (<code>HD03100</code>), Vårändringsbudget (<code>HD0399</code>) and Extra ändringsbudget (<code>HD03236</code>, fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) — into a backdrop of 0.82 % 2024 GDP growth (vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 %) and 8.7 % 2025 unemployment, the highest since the pandemic. Simultaneously, <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet</strong> advanced two grundlag amendments (<code>HD01KU32</code> media accessibility under TF + YGL, and <code>HD01KU33</code> removing "allmän handling" status from material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>) — the first substantive narrowing of <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) in years. <strong>FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and <strong>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> tabled Sweden's accession to the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> (<code>HD03231</code>, first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg) and the <strong>International Compensation Commission</strong> (<code>HD03232</code>). On Wednesday 2026‑04‑15, the chamber confirmed the coalition's working majority on <strong>JuU15</strong> (juvenile-offender tightening, 145–142) — pure bloc vote, three-vote margin, the thinnest functional majority of the spring term. Civilutskottet advanced the <strong>National Condominium Register</strong> (<code>HD01CU28</code>, ~2 M bostadsrätter, Lantmäteriet target Jan 2027) and the <strong>Lagfart / ombildning AML rules</strong> (<code>HD01CU27</code>). NATO operationalised: <strong>HD01UFöU3</strong> authorised 1,200 Swedish troops to Finland under eFP — Sweden's first major NATO operational deployment. Migration tightened on three vectors (<code>SfU22</code> inhibition orders + Prop 235 deportation expansion + Prop 229 reception law) prompting V + C + MP coordinated counter-motions structured for ECHR challenge. The week produced <strong>8 priority risks</strong> (Russian hybrid retaliation post-tribunal at top of register), surfaced <strong>two cross-cluster rhetorical tensions</strong> (press freedom abroad vs at home; green transition vs fuel-tax cut), and consolidated a <strong>coordinated pre-election legislative sprint</strong> across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, fiscal stimulus, criminal-justice tightening, housing-market integrity, and energy reform. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Decision</strong>: Lead article with <strong>the Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (<code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> + <code>HD03236</code>). <strong>Re-weighting rationale</strong>: Raw significance (10) and DIW-weighted significance (10.0 — fiscal trilogies receive ×1.00 baseline because they are policy-cyclical not democratic-infrastructure) combine with <strong>immediate citizen-impact magnitude</strong> (drivmedel, el/gas, ranta-på-amortering, försvarsanslag) and <strong>electoral salience</strong> (Sweden's economic stewardship is the central 2026 campaign axis). Spring budget weeks are the one fiscal moment of the year when the entire policy mix is on the table in a single editorial frame.</p>
 <p>The <strong>Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> + <code>HD01KU33</code>) carry <strong>higher democratic-infrastructure durability</strong> and rank <strong>#2 / #3 by DIW</strong> — they receive a dedicated H3 section in the article with the cross-reference to realtime-1434 in-depth analysis. The Coverage-Completeness Rule (≥ 7.0 weighted) is <strong>enforced</strong>: every document below also receives mandatory H3 coverage.</p>
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision
 <p><strong>Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) doctrine</strong>: documented in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a> §Rule 5. Grundlag amendments narrowing public access receive ×1.40; expanding rights ×1.25; foreign-policy continuity ×0.95; ordinary policy-cyclical ×1.00; AML premium ×1.05.</p>
 <p><strong>Anti-pattern avoidance</strong>: This week's lead is fiscal not constitutional, but the synthesis explicitly flags KU33 as the highest <em>durable democratic-infrastructure</em> development — to prevent the realtime-1434 anti-pattern (silent omission of constitutional package). Sensitivity analysis in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Sensitivity confirms the ranking under five plausible weight variations.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-developments-weighted-rank">📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-developments-weighted-rank"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-developments-weighted-rank">📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-developments-weighted-rank"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph CL1["💰 Cluster 1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy — LEAD"]
         HD03100["HD03100&#x3C;br/>Vårproposition&#x3C;br/>📊 LEAD"]
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-developments-weighted-rank">📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted
     style GANG fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style ECHR_RISK fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document">📚 Documents Analysed — Depth Level by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document">📚 Documents Analysed — Depth Level by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document">📚 Documents Analysed
 <p>Documents <strong>HD10437 (Lönetransparensdirektivet)</strong>, <strong>HD10438 (Nedläggning av kvinnojourer)</strong>, <strong>HD11718 (Statlig närvaro sydöstra Skåne)</strong>, <strong>HD11719 (Skattekrav mot kvinnor i tvångsprostitution)</strong> are interpellations / EU reports persisted in <code>documents/</code>. They appear as L1 quick-classified rows in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a>. HD10438 cross-references HD03245 (women's-violence strategy).</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Note on fuel-tax figures</strong>: This dossier consistently cites <strong>82 öre per litre</strong> as the <strong>statutory excise-duty (energiskatt) reduction</strong> in HD03236 (the Extra ändringsbudget tax-component cut). The PR description's "SEK 2.50 per litre" figure refers to the broader <strong>pump-price effect estimate</strong> including VAT pass-through and prior 2025 indexation reversals as projected by the Finansdepartementet pump-price model. The two figures measure different things; analyses across this package use the statutory tax-component figure (82 öre) for direct comparability with HD03236 fiscal arithmetic.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Finding</th><th>Evidence (dok_id / source)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Democratic Impact</th><th align="center">Election 2026 Salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td>The fiscal trilogy is the <strong>most consequential pre-election fiscal moment of the term</strong>. Fuel-tax cut (82 öre / litre) + el/gas relief target consumer cost-of-living; Vårproposition reaffirms försvarsanslag glide-path; SEK 60 B+ in net stimulus across the package.</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236; economic-data.json (GDP 0.82 %, unemployment 8.7 %); FiU committee record</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>The <strong>JuU15 chamber vote (145–142)</strong> is the <strong>thinnest functional government majority of the spring term</strong> — pure bloc vote, zero cross-aisle defections; SD voted with government on every paragraph; demonstrates the Tidö working majority holds <strong>but only just</strong>.</td><td>JuU15 protokoll; voteringsregister 2026-04-15</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH (coalition stability)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF's offentlighetsprincip</strong> in the digital-evidence sphere — modifies a 1766 text that predates the U.S. Constitution. Two-reading rule (8 kap. RF) embeds the second reading in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag.</td><td>HD01KU33 betänkande; TF 1766 original text; KU committee record; 8 kap. 14 § RF</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F4</td><td>The <strong>Migration tightening triple</strong> (SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229) is met by <strong>coordinated V + C + MP counter-motions</strong> structured as an ECHR-litigation predicate. The opposition is preparing a Strasbourg case on inhibition-order proportionality.</td><td>SfU22 betänkande; V + C + MP motioner counter-text; ECHR Convention Art. 8 + 13; UNHCR consultation record</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) = founding-member status → Sweden's <strong>largest norm-entrepreneurship commitment since NATO accession</strong>; no direct fiscal burden (reparations funded from Russian immobilised assets EUR 260 B at Euroclear + G7 venues); Nuremberg framing pre-empts SD/domestic criticism.</td><td>HD03231 proposition; HD03232 proposition; G7 Ukraine Loan Jan 2025; FM Stenergard verbatim 2026-04-16</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH (foreign-policy)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (universal consensus)</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td><strong>HD01UFöU3 = first operational NATO output</strong>: 1,200 Swedish troops authorised to Finland under eFP. Marks the <strong>shift from accession (March 2024) to operational integration</strong>. Försvarsmakten will deploy Bn-task-group elements 2026-Q3.</td><td>HD01UFöU3 betänkande; UFöU committee record; Försvarsmakten deployment timeline</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH (sovereignty doctrine)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>The <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy carries an internal coherence problem</strong>: the Extra ändringsbudget cuts fuel tax 82 öre / litre while Prop 240 (Electricity System Act) and Prop 239 (wind-power municipal revenue sharing) signal serious climate ambition. The fiscal package undermines the green-transition rhetorical brand at exactly the moment the electricity-system reform peaks.</td><td>HD03236 fiscal arithmetic; HD03240 + HD03239 propositions; Klimatpolitiska rådet 2025 report</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td><strong>Cross-cluster rhetorical tension</strong>: government championing Nuremberg-style accountability abroad (HD03231) while narrowing TF at home (HD01KU33) — opposition will frame as "Sweden defends press freedom elsewhere while compressing it at home." Latent T2 threat (<code>threat-analysis.md</code>).</td><td>HD03231 + HD01KU33 juxtaposition; political-swot-framework §TOWS Interference; campaign-rhetoric analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F9</td><td><strong>Civilutskottet AML cluster</strong> (HD01CU27 ghost-tenant rule + HD01CU28 ~2 M-bostadsrätt register Jan 2027) extends government's organised-crime agenda into property markets. Lantmäteriet IT delivery is the binding constraint — procurement notice expected Q3 2026.</td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 betänkanden; gäng-agenda Prop 2025/26:100; Lantmäteriet capacity assessment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>F10</td><td>Average weekly significance score <strong>7.5 / 10</strong> — exceptional vs the parliamentary-week baseline (~3.8). Week 16 sits in the <strong>top 5 % of legislatively-loaded weeks since 2010</strong> and structurally <strong>front-loads the entire 2026 spring agenda before the summer recess (Jul 1)</strong>.</td><td>Weekly aggregator; historical Riksmöte tempo data 2010–2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Composite Political Risk — Apr 11-17, 2026"
     x-axis ["Apr 11", "Apr 12", "Apr 13", "Apr 14", "Apr 15", "Apr 16", "Apr 17"]
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Land
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1 — Russian hybrid retaliation</strong> (post-tribunal + NATO eFP)</td><td align="center"><strong>18 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td></tr><tr><td>R2 — KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment (interpretive frontier)</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE (press freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>R3 — Migration trio ECHR strike-down</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td></tr><tr><td>R4 — Coalition fracture under SD pressure (post-145–142)</td><td align="center">11 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R5 — Fuel-tax cut undermines climate brand</td><td align="center">9 / 25</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R6 — Tribunal effectiveness without US</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE MITIGATION</td></tr><tr><td>R7 — Lantmäteriet register IT delivery delay</td><td align="center">9 / 25</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R8 — Reparations fatigue (decadal)</td><td align="center">7 / 25</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate">🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix (Week-Aggregate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate">🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix (Week-Aggregate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate">🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Fiscal Pkg (FiU)</th><th align="center">KU32/33 (constitutional)</th><th align="center">JuU15 (juvenile)</th><th align="center">Migration trio (SfU)</th><th align="center">Ukraine (UU)</th><th align="center">Energy (NU)</th><th align="center">NATO eFP (UFöU)</th><th align="center">Housing (CU)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>M (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (proposing)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns (KU33)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Support)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (AML angle)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For (Nuremberg framing aligns)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Against (counter-budget)</td><td align="center">🟡 Divided (KU33)</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (142)</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 Against</td><td align="center">🔴 Against KU33 likely 2nd reading</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (142)</td><td align="center">🔴 Strongly against (counter-motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (accountability)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🟡 Divided</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 Against</td><td align="center">🔴 Against KU33</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (142)</td><td align="center">🔴 Strongly against (counter-motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Against (own budget)</td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (counter-motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Synthesis</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: The week confirmed the four-bloc structure: (M+KD+L+SD), (S center-left), (V+MP rights-bloc), (C swing). The 145–142 JuU15 vote is the operational signature. Ukraine + KU32 + NATO consensus ≈ 349 MPs (near-universal). KU33 second reading after Sep 2026 election is <strong>structurally uncertain</strong> because the V+MP-strengthened left bloc would block.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators — Next 90 Days (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators — Next 90 Days (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 For
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner / Source</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on Extra ändringsbudget (HD03236)</td><td>FiU committee → kammarvote</td><td>Kammaren, FiU</td><td align="center"><strong>2026-04-22</strong> (scheduled)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>Committee schedule</td><td>KU</td><td align="center">2026-04-27</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</td><td>Published opinion</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on HD01KU32/KU33 first reading</td><td>KU referral → kammarvote (vilande beslut)</td><td>Kammaren, KU</td><td align="center"><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W5</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on HD03231/HD03232</td><td>UU committee → kammarvote</td><td>Kammaren, UU</td><td align="center"><strong>Late May / June 2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W6</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deploys to Finland</td><td>Operations order</td><td>Försvarsmakten</td><td align="center"><strong>2026-Q3</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W7</strong></td><td>V/C/MP ECHR challenge filing on inhibition orders</td><td>Strasbourg docket</td><td>V parlamentariska kansli</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W8</strong></td><td>S leadership position on KU33 (hardens for/against)</td><td>Partiledarskap statements</td><td>Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W9</td><td>Russian hybrid-warfare escalation</td><td>SÄPO annual report; Nordic events</td><td>SÄPO, MUST</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened)</td></tr><tr><td>W10</td><td>RSF / Freedom House publication on KU33 effects</td><td>Annual index cycle</td><td>RSF, FH</td><td align="center">2027-Q2</td></tr><tr><td>W11</td><td>Lantmäteriet register IT procurement</td><td>Anbud notice</td><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W12</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition → KU33 2nd-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten preliminary</td><td>Valmyndigheten</td><td align="center">Oct–Nov 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rule 5/6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rule 5/6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56">🗳️ Elect
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Specific Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy + JuU15 = government's central campaign assets ("ekonomin tryggare, brotten färre"). KU33 = secondary risk (V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation 0.5–1.5 pp; reverse-2008-FRA effect). Migration trio = SD-base reinforcement but ECHR risk if struck before Sep.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>M+KD+L+SD continuity (P=0.50) preserves all four legislative streams; S-led minority (P=0.35) likely re-opens budget arithmetic + may revise KU33 language; S+V+MP majority (P=0.15) blocks KU33 2nd reading + opens Vårändringsbudget renegotiation. Detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living (fuel, el, hyror) > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat > migration > grundlag. KU33 only enters top-5 if a chilling-effect case breaks before Sep 2026 (Wildcard-1).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Government most exposed on: (a) Nordic GDP gap (Sweden 0.82 % vs Denmark 3.5 %); (b) cross-cluster tension (press freedom abroad/at home); (c) ECHR ruling on inhibition orders. Opposition most exposed on: alternative fiscal arithmetic; Ukraine consensus (cannot break); JuU15 vote-against framing as "soft on crime".</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy = annual cyclical policy (resets each year). KU33 = decadal grundlag change (only reversible by another grundlag change ⇒ 2 elections). HD03231 = institutional commitment binding for tribunal lifespan (10–25 yrs precedent). HD01UFöU3 = doctrinal precedent for further NATO-integration deployments.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW + immediate-impact balance)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Sensitivity analysis in <code>significance-scoring.md</code> confirms top rank under 5 plausible weight variations</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness (≥ 7.0 weighted)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>All 11 documents above the gate appear as dedicated H3 sections in the published article</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>JuU15 = operationally validated 145–142; other patterns established</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party <strong>second-reading</strong> vote projection (KU33)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Depends on 2026 election outcome — three plausible coalition compositions</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture risk (R4)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>145–142 = stable but minimal margin; SD leverage measurable</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude (R1)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP + tribunal; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal cooperation (R6)</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Public statements ambiguous</td></tr><tr><td>Migration ECHR-strike-down probability (R3)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Counter-motion text shows preparedness; Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1553,7 +1553,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Ad
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Challenge</th><th>Mainstream View</th><th>Devil's-Advocate View</th><th>Analytic Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Spring fiscal package as "election bribe"?</strong></td><td>Stimulus targets cost-of-living pressure citizens genuinely face</td><td>Fuel-tax cut benefits high-mileage / rural voters disproportionately and undermines green credibility</td><td>Both true. The intervention is regressive on climate but genuinely targeted on income groups with highest fuel-cost share. Nordic comparators (DK fuel surtax retained; NO carbon-fee adjusted) show alternative fiscal designs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>JuU15 145–142 = stability or fragility?</strong></td><td>3-vote margin = fragile coalition</td><td>145 vs 142 = pure bloc vote with zero defections = remarkable discipline</td><td>Operational stability <strong>for legislation that fits the four-party agenda</strong>; fragility re-emerges on issues that split SD from L (most plausibly: any further constitutional / international-law commitment)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU33 = press-freedom regression?</strong></td><td>1766 narrowing is a step backwards</td><td>Norway (RSF #1), Denmark (#3), Finland (#5) operate equivalent regimes</td><td>Both true: Nordic normalisation is real; interpretive-frontier risk is real. The deciding variable is "formellt tillförd bevisning" definition strictness (<code>comparative-international.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Migration trio = ECHR strike-down inevitable?</strong></td><td>V/C/MP have prepared a litigation predicate</td><td>ECHR Article 8 jurisprudence supports proportionate inhibition orders if appeal mechanisms exist</td><td>Probability of full strike-down ≈ 0.20; partial requirement to add appeal mechanism ≈ 0.45; clean pass ≈ 0.35 (<code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Migration scenarios)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine tribunal = symbolic only without US?</strong></td><td>Without US, China, major Global South, tribunal is symbolically historic but operationally marginal</td><td>Symbolic deterrence + norm-building have independent weight; ECCC / SCSL operated effectively without all great powers</td><td>Both analyses required. Operational caseload depends on (a) Russian-asset access; (b) successor-state behaviour</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition fracture under cost-of-living = high prob?</strong></td><td>Polls show economic stewardship as #1 issue ⇒ government most exposed</td><td>Government has tabled visible relief (fuel, el, gas) ⇒ exposure is mitigated</td><td>Stewardship vulnerability persists; mitigation is partial. Outcome conditional on Q2/Q3 2026 macro data</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster S
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Combination</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine S × KU33 T</strong></td><td>Government championing Nuremberg-style accountability abroad while narrowing TF at home → rhetorical exposure</td><td>Opposition talking point: <em>"Sweden defends press freedom elsewhere while compressing it at home"</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal S × Migration T</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living relief sells well to median voter; migration tightening sells to SD base; tension is between coalition partner L (most uncomfortable on migration) and SD</td><td>L–SD friction is the strategic centre of gravity for coalition stability through Sep 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Energy O × Fiscal W</strong></td><td>Electricity System Act + wind-power municipal share = green ambition; fuel-tax cut = climate inversion</td><td>Government must hold both narratives simultaneously; opposition (MP especially) will exploit</td></tr><tr><td><strong>JuU15 razor-thin × SD leverage</strong></td><td>145–142 with SD as kingmaker on every paragraph = coalition cannot afford SD defection on any subsequent vote</td><td>Effective rightward agenda pull; L most exposed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>(Full TOWS matrix in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS.)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties">❓ Key Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-uncertainties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties">❓ Key Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1643,7 +1643,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties">❓ Key Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Uncertainty</th><th>Decision Impact</th><th align="center">Resolution Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>U1</td><td>Will Lagrådet scope "formellt tillförd bevisning" strictly?</td><td>Primary driver of KU33 interpretive trajectory</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U2</td><td>Will V/C/MP win partial or full ECHR ruling on inhibition orders?</td><td>Reverses or narrows SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229</td><td align="center">H2 2026 / 2027</td></tr><tr><td>U3</td><td>Will the spring fiscal package translate into measurable Q3 2026 economic indicators?</td><td>Decisive for Sep 2026 government economic-stewardship narrative</td><td align="center">2026-07-01 (KI prognos)</td></tr><tr><td>U4</td><td>Will post-Sep-2026 Riksdag composition support KU33 ratification?</td><td>Go / no-go for grundlag change</td><td align="center">2026-09-13</td></tr><tr><td>U5</td><td>Will US administration cooperate with HD03231 tribunal?</td><td>Tribunal effectiveness</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U6</td><td>Will Russian hybrid-warfare response escalate above threshold?</td><td>Security posture + campaign dynamics</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened pre-election)</td></tr><tr><td>U7</td><td>Will the JuU15 145–142 majority hold for the next contentious vote?</td><td>Coalition stability indicator</td><td align="center">2026-Q2 / Q3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-artifacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-artifacts"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Reference-grade dossier files</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md">Comparative International</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></li>
@@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1700,7 +1700,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SIG-ID</strong></td><td>SIG-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>DIW v1.0 (Democratic-Impact Weighting) per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scoring Scale</strong></td><td>Raw 0–10 (5-dimension composite) → DIW multiplier → Weighted 0–10 (capped at 10.0 for documents whose weighted score would otherwise exceed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Scored</strong></td><td>23 high-significance + 8 supplementary (rapid quick-classify)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Persisted</strong></td><td>11 dok files in <code>documents/</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite">🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Scoring (0–10 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite">🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Scoring (0–10 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite"></a></h3>
 <p>The composite raw score is the rounded mean of five dimensions per <code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0:</p>
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite">🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Sc
 <p><strong>Why raw scoring exists</strong>: The raw score is the news-value rank. The DIW multiplier converts it into the <strong>democratic-infrastructure-aware editorial rank</strong> (per Rule 5). Both are reported below.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51">🧮 DIW Multiplier Doctrine (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51">🧮 DIW Multiplier Doctrine (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51">🧮 DIW
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document Class</th><th align="center">DIW Multiplier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Grundlag amendment narrowing public access</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>×1.40</strong></td><td>Reversal window measured in decades (two-election rule) ⇒ highest weight</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag amendment expanding rights</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td>Decadal durability + rights-positive framing</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional / electoral / institutional reform (ordinary law)</td><td align="center">×1.15</td><td>Rule-of-law durability above policy cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Anti-money-laundering / financial-integrity premium</td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td>Cross-cutting institutional value</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary policy-cyclical (budget, tax, spending)</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td>Annual reset cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign-policy continuity (treaty accession in established framework)</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td>Substantively important but in established direction</td></tr><tr><td>Routine procedural / administrative</td><td align="center">×0.85</td><td>High volume, low marginal-impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score">📈 Master Scoring Table — All Documents Ranked by Weighted Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score">📈 Master Scoring Table — All Documents Ranked by Weighted Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score">📈 M
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Type / Committee</th><th>Date</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW ×</th><th align="center"><strong>Weighted</strong></th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Article Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>HD03100</strong></td><td>Vårpropositionen 2026</td><td>Prop / FiU</td><td>04-13</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>10.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> (fiscal trilogy lead)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Insyn vid husrannsakan (constitutional)</td><td>Bet / KU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>1.40</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>📜 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> (constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>HD0399</strong></td><td>Vårändringsbudgeten 2026</td><td>Prop / FiU</td><td>04-13</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🏛️ Co-prominent (fiscal trilogy)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>HD03236</strong></td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel + el/gas</td><td>Prop / FiU</td><td>04-13</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🏛️ Co-prominent (fiscal trilogy)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>HD03246</strong></td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>Prop / JuU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>⚖️ Co-prominent (JuU15 vote 145–142)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav vissa medier (constitutional)</td><td>Bet / KU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>1.25</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.75</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>📜 Co-prominent (constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Ukraine Special Tribunal</td><td>Prop / UU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🌍 Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>Inhibition orders (migration)</td><td>Bet / SfU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🛂 Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>Ukraine Damages Commission</td><td>Prop / UU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🤝 Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>HD01UFöU3</strong></td><td>NATO eFP Finland 1,200 troops</td><td>Bet / UFöU</td><td>04-15</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🛡️ Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td>Prop 235</td><td>Deportation expansion</td><td>Prop / SfU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🛂 Mandatory H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td>Prop 229</td><td>New reception law</td><td>Prop / SfU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🛂 Mandatory H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">13</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity System Act</td><td>Prop / NU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>⚡ Mandatory H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategy on men's violence vs women</td><td>Skr / AU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>🆘 Mandatory H3 (HD10438 cross-link)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning</td><td>Prop / JuU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>6.30</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>⚖️ Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Lagfart + ombildning + AML</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>1.05</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>6.30</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🏠 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">17</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperability data sharing</td><td>Prop / TU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>💻 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">18</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Active forestry framework</td><td>Prop / MJU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>🌲 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">19</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power municipal share</td><td>Prop / NU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>⚡ Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">20</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Bostadsrättsregister</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🏠 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">21</td><td>HD03233</td><td>Anti-fraud electronic communications</td><td>Prop / TU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>5.25</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>Section reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">22</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion mot Extra ändringsbudget (counter-budget)</td><td>Mot / FiU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>5.25</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Counter-narrative reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">23</td><td>HD01CU22</td><td>Ställföreträdarskap att lita på</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">24</td><td>HD01CU42</td><td>Riksrevisionen om dödsbon</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">25</td><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">26</td><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Cross-link to HD03245</td></tr><tr><td align="center">27</td><td>HD11718</td><td>Statlig närvaro sydöstra Skåne (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>3.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">28</td><td>HD11719</td><td>Skattekrav mot kvinnor i tvångsprostitution (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate">🏛️ Coverage-Completeness Verification (Rule 5 Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate">🏛️ Coverage-Completeness Verification (Rule 5 Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Rule</strong>: Every document with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 MUST appear as a dedicated H3 section in the published article.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate">🏛️ Coverage-
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Weighted</th><th align="center">Article H3?</th><th>Verification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td align="center">10.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>LEAD section "Spring Fiscal Package"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">9.80</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms"</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>LEAD section</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>LEAD section</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Criminal Justice / JuU15"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">8.75</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">8.55</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Ukraine Accountability"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">8.55</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Migration Tightening"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Ukraine Accountability"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"NATO Operationalisation"</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Migration Tightening"</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Migration Tightening"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Energy &#x26; Green Transition"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Women's Violence Strategy"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Result</strong>: ✅ <strong>PASS</strong> — 14 / 14 weighted-≥-7 documents covered as dedicated sections.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision-with-reasoning">🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with reasoning)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision-with-reasoning"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-with-reasoning">🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with reasoning)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-with-reasoning"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Q["❓ Lead-Story Decision Process&#x3C;br/>Week 16, 2026"]
     Q --> R1["1. Compute raw score&#x3C;br/>5-dim composite"]
@@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision-with-reasoning">🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with r
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Anti-pattern avoidance</strong>: The synthesis-summary explicitly flags KU33 as the highest <em>democratic-infrastructure durability</em> development of the week — preventing the realtime-1434 anti-pattern (silent omission of the constitutional package).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes">🧪 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Lead Hold Under Alternative Weight Schemes?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes">🧪 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Lead Hold Under Alternative Weight Schemes?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2325,7 +2325,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-sc
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">DIW grundlag-narrowing weight</th><th align="center">KU33 weighted</th><th>Top-1 Result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Baseline (DIW v1.0)</strong></td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center">9.80</td><td><strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy (10.00)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Scenario A: very strong democratic-infrastructure preference</td><td align="center">×1.50</td><td align="center">10.50</td><td><strong>KU33 (10.50)</strong> ← lead would shift</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario B: moderate preference</td><td align="center">×1.30</td><td align="center">9.10</td><td>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario C: news-value purist</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario D: foreign-policy elevated (×1.15)</td><td align="center">grundlag ×1.40</td><td align="center">9.80; HD03231 = 10.35</td><td><strong>HD03231 (10.35)</strong> ← lead would shift</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario E: ordinary fiscal de-prioritised (×0.85)</td><td align="center">grundlag ×1.40, fiscal ×0.85</td><td align="center">9.80; HD03100 = 8.50</td><td><strong>KU33 (9.80)</strong> ← lead would shift</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The lead-story decision is <strong>stable for baseline</strong> and <strong>stable for scenarios B, C</strong> (3 / 5 scenarios). It would shift to KU33 only under a stronger democratic-infrastructure preference (Scenario A) or fiscal-de-prioritisation (Scenario E), and to HD03231 only under foreign-policy elevation (Scenario D). The baseline DIW v1.0 weights remain the canonical methodology call. No alternative scheme produces a fourth alternative leader.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-distribution-histogram">📊 Significance Distribution Histogram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-distribution-histogram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-distribution-histogram">📊 Significance Distribution Histogram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-distribution-histogram"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-distribution-histogram">📊 Significance Distribution
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weighted Score Band</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Documents</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.5 – 10.0</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03100 (10.0), HD01KU33 (9.8)</td></tr><tr><td>8.5 – 9.4</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD0399 (9.0), HD03236 (9.0), HD03246 (9.0), HD01KU32 (8.75), HD03231 (8.55), HD01SfU22 (8.55)</td></tr><tr><td>7.0 – 8.4</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD03232, HD01UFöU3, Prop 235, Prop 229, HD03240, HD03245</td></tr><tr><td>5.5 – 6.9</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD03237, HD01CU27, HD03244, HD03242, HD03239, HD01CU28</td></tr><tr><td>4.0 – 5.4</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD03233, HD024098, HD01CU22, HD01CU42, HD10438, HD11719</td></tr><tr><td>&#x3C; 4.0</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10437, HD11718</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Average weighted significance</strong>: 6.85 / 10 (across 28 scored items). 14 documents above the 7.0 mandatory-H3 gate. <strong>Average rank places Week 16 in the top 5 % of legislatively-loaded weeks since 2010</strong> (parliamentary-week baseline mean ≈ 3.8). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-document-class">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Document Class<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-document-class"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-by-document-class">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Document Class<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-by-document-class"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-document-class">🗳️ Election 20
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document Class</th><th align="center">Election Salience</th><th>Reasoning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Spring Fiscal Trilogy (HD03100/0399/236)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Cost-of-living is #1 voter issue; Q3 2026 macro = Sep 2026 verdict</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>KU33 second reading post-election ⇒ becomes campaign vector</td></tr><tr><td>JuU15 (HD03246)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Brott + ordning is #2 voter issue; Tidö centerpiece</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine package (HD03231/HD03232)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Universal cross-party consensus dampens electoral exploit</td></tr><tr><td>Migration trio</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>SD-base reinforcement; ECHR challenge could reverse pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP (UFöU3)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Försvar is #4 voter issue; symbolic NATO operationalisation</td></tr><tr><td>Energy (NU 240/239)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Climate vs fuel-tax cut creates internal contradictions</td></tr><tr><td>Housing/AML (CU27/CU28)</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Implementation-window 2026/27; minimal Sep salience</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Lead-Story Decision uses this scoring directly</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a> §Per-Document Classification cross-links each row</li>
@@ -2432,7 +2432,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5 (DIW v1.0)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>STK-ID</strong></td><td>STK-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-style-guide.md</code> (6-lens stakeholder analysis) + Election 2026 implication grid</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Lenses</strong></td><td>6 — Government coalition · Parliamentary opposition · Civil society / general public · International / EU / NATO · Industry &#x26; business · Media &#x26; investigative journalism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--six-lens-stakeholder-matrix">🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--six-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-six-lens-stakeholder-matrix">🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-six-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2514,8 +2514,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--six-lens-stakeholder-matrix">🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Top Concern Week 16</th><th>Top Action / Posture</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟦 <strong>Government coalition (M+KD+L) + SD</strong></td><td>Execute fiscal trilogy + JuU15 + KU + Ukraine package without coalition fracture</td><td>Sequencing discipline, narrative co-ordination, Lagrådet engagement</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>🟥 <strong>Parliamentary opposition (S, V, MP, C)</strong></td><td>Counter-budget, KU33 critique, migration counter-motions, climate framing</td><td>S budget presentation; V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation; C swing positioning; ECHR predicate</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>👥 <strong>Civil society / general public</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living, security, women's-violence services, regional services</td><td>Demand for relief; concern over R1 hybrid; vigilance on KU33</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>🌍 <strong>International / EU / NATO / Ukraine</strong></td><td>Sweden's eFP operationalisation; Council-of-Europe tribunal architecture</td><td>Coordinated tribunal advocacy; NATO operational integration</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>🏭 <strong>Industry &#x26; business</strong></td><td>Energy-system reform; forestry framework; bostadsregister; AML compliance; police-recruitment investment</td><td>Compliance preparation; investment alignment with HD03240 + HD03242; AML costs absorbed</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>📰 <strong>Media &#x26; investigative journalism</strong></td><td>KU33 chilling-effect risk; cross-cluster rhetorical exposure; election-cycle disinformation pressure</td><td>Press-freedom NGO coordination; verification-discipline against T1</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support">🟦 Lens 1 — Government Coalition (M+KD+L) + SD Parliamentary Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support">🟦 Lens 1 — Government Coalition (M+KD+L) + SD Parliamentary Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2576,13 +2576,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Position Week 16</th><th>Election 2026 Stake</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader, package signatory</td><td>Personally tabled fiscal trilogy + Ukraine architecture</td><td>Owns economic-stewardship narrative; Nuremberg framing for SD-friction prevention</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, FM)</td><td>Vårproposition author</td><td>Fiscal credibility custodian; defended Nordic-GDP gap with stimulus framing</td><td>Q3 2026 macro = Sep verdict</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, FM)</td><td>Tribunal architect</td><td>Norm-entrepreneurship voice 2026-04-16</td><td>Norm-leadership capital</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, JM)</td><td>KU33 + JuU15 owner</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning"; juvenile-offender execution</td><td>Legacy on rule-of-law definition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson</strong> (M, DM)</td><td>NATO eFP owner</td><td>Försvarsmakten operational owner</td><td>First-NATO-deployment legacy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong> (KD, party leader, EM)</td><td>Coalition partner</td><td>Energy / law-and-order alignment</td><td>Coalition continuity stake</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader, AM)</td><td>Coalition partner</td><td>KU33 + migration trio identity strain</td><td>Liberal brand under pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong> (SD, leader)</td><td>Parliamentary support</td><td>145-142 leverage; migration-trio political owner</td><td>Cabinet-entry post-Sep ambition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-key-documents-cited">Key Documents Cited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-cited"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-documents-cited">Key Documents Cited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-cited"></a></h4>
 <p><code>HD03100</code> · <code>HD0399</code> · <code>HD03236</code> · <code>HD03246</code> · <code>HD01KU32</code> · <code>HD01KU33</code> · <code>HD03231</code> · <code>HD03232</code> · <code>HD01UFöU3</code> · <code>HD01SfU22</code> · <code>HD03240</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens"></a></h4>
 <p>Coalition will run on a <strong>four-pillar platform</strong>: economic-stewardship (fiscal trilogy + macro execution), law-and-order (JuU15 + police-training HD03237), national security (NATO eFP + Ukraine architecture), migration tightening (SfU22 + Prop 235/229). Vulnerable on Nordic-GDP gap, climate self-contradiction, and L-party identity strain. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c">🟥 Lens 2 — Parliamentary Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-1">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c">🟥 Lens 2 — Parliamentary Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-map-1">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2631,18 +2631,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-1">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Position Week 16</th><th>Election 2026 Stake</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, leader)</td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Counter-budget arithmetic; KU33 position decisive variable</td><td>PM-candidate; coalition arithmetic owner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong> (S, finance spokesman)</td><td>Counter-budget architect</td><td>Cost-of-living narrative + Nordic-GDP-gap framing</td><td>Economic credibility duel with Svantesson</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, leader)</td><td>V leader</td><td>Against migration trio + KU33 + budget</td><td>Attentive-voter mobilisation 0.5–1.5 pp on KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>MP leader</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate; climate-credibility critic</td><td>Green-vote ceiling expansion via fuel-tax-cut critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong> (C, leader)</td><td>Centre-bloc swing</td><td>Migration counter-motion architect</td><td>Survival via differentiation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Märta Stenevi</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>MP leader</td><td>Co-leader on climate + KU33</td><td>MP coalition leverage</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-counter-strategies-this-week">Counter-Strategies This Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-strategies-this-week"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-counter-strategies-this-week">Counter-Strategies This Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-strategies-this-week"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S</strong>: Counter-budget published 2026-04-18 (HD024098 motion class) emphasising Nordic-GDP gap, employment, welfare investment</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong>: Sharp KU33 critique; structural opposition to migration trio; demand for Strasbourg challenge</li>
 <li><strong>MP</strong>: Fuel-tax-cut climate critique; coalition with V on KU33; constructive engagement on Electricity System Act</li>
 <li><strong>C</strong>: Migration counter-motion (with V + MP); own budget alternative; KU33 cross-party negotiation posture</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-1">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-1">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Opposition contests on <strong>cost-of-living + climate + civil-rights</strong>. S best-positioned to claim cost-of-living; V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33 + migration; C survives via differentiation from both blocs. Key risk: opposition fragmentation prevents single PM-alternative narrative. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-3--civil-society--general-public">👥 Lens 3 — Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-3--civil-society--general-public"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents">Concerns Mapped to Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-3--civil-society--general-public">👥 Lens 3 — Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3--civil-society--general-public"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents">Concerns Mapped to Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2699,7 +2699,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents">Concerns Mapped to Documents<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Public Concern</th><th>Top Document(s)</th><th align="center">Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cost of living (fuel, electricity, food)</td><td>HD03236, HD0399, HD03100</td><td align="center">🟢 Relief</td></tr><tr><td>Crime + safety</td><td>HD03246, HD03237, HD01CU27</td><td align="center">🟢 Tightening</td></tr><tr><td>Women's violence services</td><td>HD03245, HD10438</td><td align="center">🟡 Policy + funding gap</td></tr><tr><td>Press freedom + transparency</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Migration / asylum-seeker rights</td><td>HD01SfU22, Prop 235, Prop 229</td><td align="center">🔴 Tightening</td></tr><tr><td>Climate + energy</td><td>HD03240, HD03239, HD03236, HD03242</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market integrity</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td align="center">🟢 Improvement</td></tr><tr><td>Regional service equity</td><td>HD11718 (Skåne), HD11719</td><td align="center">🔴 Concern</td></tr><tr><td>National security</td><td>HD01UFöU3, HD03231</td><td align="center">🟢 Strengthening</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-civil-society-voices">Civil-Society Voices<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society-voices"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society-voices">Civil-Society Voices<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society-voices"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Press-freedom NGOs</strong> (SJF, TU, Utgivarna): joint statement on KU33 expected Q2 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Domestic-violence shelters</strong> (Roks, Unizon): HD10438 interpellation reflects funding stress</li>
@@ -2707,11 +2707,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-civil-society-voices">Civil-Society Voices<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>Climate / environmental NGOs</strong> (Naturskyddsföreningen, KPR): fuel-tax-cut critique</li>
 <li><strong>Lantmäteriet citizen-impact</strong>: bostadsregister change affects ~2 M bostadsrätter holders</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-2">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-2">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-2"></a></h4>
 <p>Public salience: cost-of-living > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat > migration > grundlag. KU33 only enters top-5 if a chilling-effect case breaks before Sep 2026. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine">🌍 Lens 4 — International / EU / NATO / Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-2">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine">🌍 Lens 4 — International / EU / NATO / Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-map-2">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2763,10 +2763,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-2">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Position Week 16</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong> (Ukraine)</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 2025 co-signatory</td><td>Tribunal political guarantor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NATO HQ + Allied Command</strong></td><td>NATO eFP framework</td><td>Welcomes Sweden Bn-task-group as full-spectrum operational integration</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td>Tribunal framework</td><td>Founding-member processing for HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Euroclear / Russian assets venues</strong></td><td>Reparations architecture</td><td>EUR 260 B immobilised — operational base for HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>EAA implementation oversight (KU32)</td><td>Welcomes grundlag entrenchment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UNHCR Sweden country office</strong></td><td>Migration-trio scrutiny</td><td>Concerns to be reflected in country report</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (adversarial)</strong></td><td>Tribunal target + NATO opponent</td><td>Hybrid-response posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nordic peers (DK, NO, FI)</strong></td><td>Comparative reference</td><td>DK fiscal stewardship benchmark; FI hybrid-response template; NO statutory-trigger model for KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-3">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-3">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-3"></a></h4>
 <p>International reception of Sweden's Ukraine + NATO + grundlag posture is uniformly positive within EU/NATO; Russia + adversarial actors contribute to T1 risk. Cross-party Ukraine consensus precludes effective opposition exploitation; international dimension of campaign therefore <strong>dampened relative to domestic dimensions</strong>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-5--industry--business">🏭 Lens 5 — Industry &#x26; Business<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-5--industry--business"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-5--industry--business">🏭 Lens 5 — Industry &#x26; Business<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5--industry--business"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2823,11 +2823,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--lens-5--industry--business">🏭 Lens 5 — Industry &#x26; Business
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sector</th><th>Document Impact</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Energy (utilities, grid)</td><td>HD03240 (Electricity System Act)</td><td>Investment alignment for smart-grid + storage</td></tr><tr><td>Renewable energy</td><td>HD03239 (wind power municipal)</td><td>Re-engage stalled projects</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry</td><td>HD03242 (active forestry framework)</td><td>Resume deferred capital allocation</td></tr><tr><td>Telecom</td><td>HD03244 (interoperability) + HD03233 (anti-fraud)</td><td>Compliance + EU alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel retail / logistics</td><td>HD03236 (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>Pricing pass-through; demand-side response</td></tr><tr><td>Real estate / housing</td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 + HD01CU22</td><td>AML controls + register-data feed integration</td></tr><tr><td>Defence industry (Saab, BAE, etc.)</td><td>HD01UFöU3 + försvarsanslag</td><td>Operational support contracts</td></tr><tr><td>Police / public sector</td><td>HD03237 (paid police training)</td><td>Recruitment ramp-up</td></tr><tr><td>Banking &#x26; financial services</td><td>HD01CU27 (AML)</td><td>Onboarding-process update</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-4">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-4">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-4"></a></h4>
 <p>Industry generally welcomes the stability of legislative pipeline; concerns on (a) climate signal coherence (HD03236 vs HD03240); (b) implementation timeline for housing register; (c) AML compliance burden. <strong>No major industry actor opposes the package as a whole</strong> — indicating coordinated stakeholder consultation in advance. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-6--media--investigative-journalism">📰 Lens 6 — Media &#x26; Investigative Journalism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-6--media--investigative-journalism"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-concerns">Concerns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-6--media--investigative-journalism">📰 Lens 6 — Media &#x26; Investigative Journalism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6--media--investigative-journalism"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-concerns">Concerns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2864,17 +2864,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-concerns">Concerns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Concern</th><th>Document(s)</th><th align="center">Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 chilling effect on source-protection</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH (decadal)</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster rhetorical exposure (press-freedom-abroad-vs-home)</td><td>HD03231 + HD01KU33 juxtaposition</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH (campaign cycle)</td></tr><tr><td>Election-cycle disinformation pressure (T1 vector)</td><td>T1 (threat-analysis.md)</td><td align="center">🔴 CRITICAL (continuous)</td></tr><tr><td>FOIA/offentlighet workflow disruption</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Journalist-source confidentiality</td><td>HD01KU33 + JuU15</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination">Press-Freedom NGO Coordination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination">Press-Freedom NGO Coordination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SJF (Svenska Journalistförbundet)</strong>: prepares remissvar on KU33 + statutory-clarity demand</li>
 <li><strong>TU (Tidningsutgivarna)</strong>: industry-association joint statement</li>
 <li><strong>Utgivarna</strong>: editorial-independence platform</li>
 <li><strong>RSF + Freedom House</strong>: international index implications</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-5">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-5">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-5"></a></h4>
 <p>Investigative journalism becomes a <strong>double resource</strong>: (a) the operational instrument for accountability through the campaign; (b) the <em>target</em> of disinformation under T1 vector. Newsroom resilience programmes + civil-society partnerships are critical defensive infrastructure. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--influence-network-map">🌐 Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--influence-network-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-map">🌐 Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOV["🟦 Government Coalition&#x3C;br/>M+KD+L+SD"]
     OPP["🟥 Opposition Bloc&#x3C;br/>S+V+MP+C"]
@@ -2928,7 +2928,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--influence-network-map">🌐 Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hi
     style IND fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style MED fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Stakeholder<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Stakeholder<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2991,7 +2991,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder">🗳️ Election 2026
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Key Election Move</th><th align="center">Decisive Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government</td><td>Fiscal-stewardship + JuU15 + NATO + Ukraine campaign messaging</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3 (macro-data lock-in)</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Counter-budget definition + KU33 second-reading position</td><td align="center">2026-Q3 (manifesto lock-in)</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Single-issue mobilisation on KU33 + migration</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Climate-credibility framing + KU33 alliance with V</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Centre-positioning + survival messaging</td><td align="center">2026-Q3 (poll trajectory)</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Migration-delivery showcase + Cabinet-entry signalling</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>Civil society</td><td>Cost-of-living, services protection, KU33 vigilance</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>EU/NATO solidarity in early Q3 if Russian hybrid event</td><td align="center">Event-driven</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Investment-stability messaging</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3</td></tr><tr><td>Media</td><td>Election-disinformation defensive operations</td><td align="center">2026-Q3 (campaign peak)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Cross-Party Vote Matrix maps party-by-document positions</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §Stakeholder SWOT compresses these perspectives into 4-quadrant grid</li>
@@ -3002,7 +3002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder analysis (<code>political-style-guide.md</code>) + Election 2026 implication grid (<code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5 Election lens)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3034,7 +3034,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SCN-ID</strong></td><td>SCN-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>Forward horizon 2026-04-18 → 2026-Q4 (90-day base + post-Sep election)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian priors + ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scenarios</strong></td><td>3 base + 2 wildcards</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3095,10 +3095,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands">🎯 Three Base Scenarios 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Wildcard</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Impact if realised</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid escalation</strong> materially shifts campaign agenda</td><td align="center">P = 0.20 (rising)</td><td>Adds ~5 pp to government continuity probability; shifts S3 → ~0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W2</strong></td><td><strong>ECHR strike-down on inhibition orders</strong> lands pre-Sep</td><td align="center">P = 0.15</td><td>Damages government legal credibility; shifts S2 → ~0.40</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s1--continuity-scenario-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s1--continuity-scenario-p--050"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s1--continuity-scenario-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--continuity-scenario-p--050"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h4>
 <p>The M+KD+L government, supported in Riksdag by SD, is re-confirmed after Sep 2026. The Tidö working majority extends. Vårpropositionens fiscal architecture executes; KU32 + KU33 grundlag amendments ratify in second reading; tribunal architecture operationalises; NATO eFP fully deploys.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3141,7 +3141,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Q3 2026 macro improvement (GDP > 1.5 % run-rate, unemployment ↓ to ~8.3 %)</td><td>KI Konjunkturinstitutet + SCB Q3 report</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>JuU15 vote pattern repeats (no SD defection on subsequent close votes)</td><td>Voteringsregister</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.70)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>KU33 second reading passes (post-election Riksdag composition supports)</td><td>Sep 2026 election result</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Russian hybrid response containable (no major event triggering crisis)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.65)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ECHR migration challenge does not strike down pre-Sep</td><td>Strasbourg docket</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.80)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Q2/Q3 2026 macro data (KI, SCB)</li>
 <li>Coalition close-vote frequency post-2026-04-15</li>
@@ -3149,7 +3149,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>ECHR docket on inhibition-orders cases</li>
 <li>Polls trajectory (M+KD+L+SD vs S+V+MP+C)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Fiscal trilogy executes; KU33 ratifies; tribunal operationalises; NATO Bn-task-group deploys</li>
 <li>✅ Election message: "ekonomin tryggare, brotten färre, försvaret starkare"</li>
@@ -3157,10 +3157,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>⚠️ Continued L-party identity strain on migration trio</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (S-led minority)  (P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (S-led minority)  (P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h4>
 <p>S becomes largest party Sep 2026. Government coalition forms on <strong>S minority</strong> + occasional V/MP/C cooperation. KU33 second reading <strong>fails</strong> (or is rewritten). Vårpropositionens fiscal arithmetic re-opened. Migration trio retained but reformed. Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained intact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3197,14 +3197,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Cost-of-living salience captures voters</td><td>Pre-Sep poll trajectory</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Q3 2026 macro disappoints (GDP &#x3C; 1.0 %, unemployment > 8.5 %)</td><td>KI + SCB</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.45)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Climate-credibility erosion mobilises MP/V attentive voters (~1.5 pp)</td><td>Polls</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>S leadership crystallises post-election coalition arithmetic credibly</td><td>Andersson behaviour</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.70)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-1">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-1">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Cost-of-living poll questions + party-of-best-economic-stewardship</li>
 <li>Climate-policy salience trajectory</li>
 <li>S counter-budget public reception</li>
 <li>Government close-vote frequency (signalling weakness)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>⚠️ Vårpropositionens fiscal architecture re-opened (welfare ↑, försvar ↔)</li>
 <li>✅ Climate-policy re-prioritisation (ev fuel-tax retention; HD03240 acceleration)</li>
@@ -3213,10 +3213,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li>✅ Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained (cross-party consensus durability)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority  (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority  (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h4>
 <p>S + V + MP combined exceed 175 seats Sep 2026. MP/V enter government. KU33 second reading explicitly rejected. Vårproposition reversed in significant part. Migration trio reversed or partially rewritten. Ukraine + NATO retained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-2">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-2">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3259,14 +3259,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-2">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Major coalition fracture pre-Sep (multi-vote government losses)</td><td>Voteringsregister</td><td align="center">🟥 L (~0.20)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>KU33 + migration + climate critiques converge as single campaign frame</td><td>Polls + media</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.30)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Russian hybrid event does not catalyse security-frame (would benefit government)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>C survives at >5 % parliamentary threshold</td><td>Polls</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>V-MP coalition arithmetic with S accepted</td><td>Polls + leadership statements</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-2">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-2">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Government close-vote frequency</li>
 <li>Press-freedom-incident catalysing (KU33 trigger event)</li>
 <li>Climate-policy salience (Q2/Q3)</li>
 <li>Polls trajectory (S+V+MP vs M+KD+L+SD)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>⚠️ Reversal of significant Tidö-deal architecture</li>
 <li>✅ Climate-policy strong re-prioritisation</li>
@@ -3276,15 +3276,15 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li>⚠️ Cabinet learning-curve dampens early-term execution</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising">🌪️ W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation Wildcard (P = 0.20, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-events">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising">🌪️ W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation Wildcard (P = 0.20, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-events">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Major attribution-confirmed cyber attack on Swedish critical infrastructure</li>
 <li>Sabotage / destruction of Nordic submarine cable</li>
 <li>Instrumentalised migration on Finnish border (Finnish 2023–24 precedent)</li>
 <li>Election-disinformation campaign with measurable poll-swing impact</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cascading-consequences">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     W1["W1 Trigger:&#x3C;br/>Major Russian hybrid event"]
     W1 --> SHIFT["Campaign agenda shift to security"]
@@ -3298,21 +3298,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden
     style SHIFT fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style GOV_UP fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style SD_UP fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S1 probability rises to ~0.55</li>
 <li>S2 probability falls to ~0.30</li>
 <li>S3 probability falls to ~0.05</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015">🌪️ W2 — ECHR Strike-Down Pre-Sep (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-events-1">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015">🌪️ W2 — ECHR Strike-Down Pre-Sep (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-events-1">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Strasbourg admits V/C/MP case to merits + issues judgment</li>
 <li>Partial requirement to add appeal mechanism in inhibition-orders regime</li>
 <li>Government legal-credibility narrative damaged</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences-1">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cascading-consequences-1">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences-1"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     W2["W2 Trigger:&#x3C;br/>ECHR strike-down on migration trio"]
     W2 --> LEGAL["Government legal-credibility hit"]
@@ -3326,14 +3326,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences-1">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidd
     style LEGAL fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style S_UP fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style R4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S1 probability falls to ~0.42</li>
 <li>S2 probability rises to ~0.40</li>
 <li>S3 probability rises to ~0.18</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome">🎯 ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) — Sep 2026 Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome">🎯 ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) — Sep 2026 Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong>: ACH evaluates each scenario against each indicator; scenarios that <strong>survive contradiction</strong> with most indicators rank highest.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3405,7 +3405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome">🎯 ACH (An
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">S1 (Continuity)</th><th align="center">S2 (S-led)</th><th align="center">S3 (S+V+MP)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q3 macro improves (≥ 1.5 % GDP)</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">I</td></tr><tr><td>Q3 macro disappoints (≤ 1.0 %)</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Major Russian hybrid event</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">I</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR strike-down pre-Sep</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Climate salience top-3</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Cost-of-living top-1</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">I (S+V+MP arithmetic)</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture (multi-vote losses)</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Universal Ukraine consensus durable</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 chilling case pre-Sep</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>C = consistent with scenario · I = inconsistent</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates">🕰️ 90-Day Monitoring Indicators (with Triggers and Bayesian Updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates">🕰️ 90-Day Monitoring Indicators (with Triggers and Bayesian Updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3473,7 +3473,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates">
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Reading Frequency</th><th>Direction → Scenario</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q2/Q3 GDP / unemployment data</td><td>KI + SCB</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>Up → S1; Down → S2</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition close-vote count</td><td>Voteringsregister</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Many → S2/S3; Few → S1</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO hybrid bulletins</td><td>SÄPO open assessment</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Major event → W1 → S1↑</td></tr><tr><td>Strasbourg ECHR docket</td><td>ECtHR</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Admission → W2 → S2/S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom NGO incidents</td><td>RSF + SJF</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Trigger event → S2/S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 second-reading polls</td><td>SVT/SCB</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>S+V+MP advantage → S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet KU32/KU33 yttrande</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>One-off</td><td>Strict scoping → R2↓</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-policy salience polls</td><td>Polls</td><td>Continuous</td><td>High salience → S2/S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>Polls (party-by-party)</td><td>Demoskop, Sifo, Inizio</td><td>Continuous</td><td>M+KD+L+SD ≥ 175 → S1; S+V+MP+C ≥ 175 → S3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3517,7 +3517,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory">🗳️ Election 2026 Impli
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>S1</th><th>S2</th><th>S3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Government re-elected</td><td>S largest, minority</td><td>S+V+MP majority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>M+KD+L+SD repeated</td><td>S minority + cooperation</td><td>S+V+MP government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Security + economy</td><td>Cost-of-living + climate</td><td>Civil-rights + climate + cost-of-living</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Climate self-contradiction</td><td>Coalition arithmetic</td><td>Cabinet learning-curve</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>KU33 ratifies; fiscal architecture executes</td><td>Fiscal re-opened; KU33 fails</td><td>Fiscal reversed; KU33 fails; migration reformed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Top Risk Indicators feed scenario triggers (R1=W1, R3=W2, R4=S2/S3)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §T1 = W1 trigger</li>
@@ -3528,7 +3528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if W1/W2 trigger fires) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian + ACH</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3560,7 +3560,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RSK-ID</strong></td><td>RSK-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x (5×5 Likelihood × Impact + Bayesian update + ALARP + cascading-risk)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Risk Inventory</strong></td><td>8 priority risks · 4 watch-list items</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-risk-indicators-55-matrix">🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-risk-indicators-55-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-risk-indicators-55-matrix">🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-indicators-55-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3649,7 +3649,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-risk-indicators-55-matrix">🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Likelihood (1-5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1-5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare retaliation</strong> post-tribunal (HD03231) + NATO eFP (HD01UFöU3) — cyber, sabotage, disinformation, infrastructure harassment, instrumentalised migration</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>20 / 25</strong> → <strong>18 / 25</strong> with mitigation</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> — "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretive frontier; chilling effect on investigative journalism over 5+ years</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td><strong>Migration trio ECHR strike-down or partial reversal</strong> (SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229) under Article 8 + 13 challenge</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition fracture under SD pressure</strong> — post-145–142 JuU15 vote, future close votes risky; SD as kingmaker</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong> → <strong>11 / 25</strong> with sequencing discipline</td><td align="center">🟠 MANAGE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td><strong>Climate-credibility erosion</strong> — fuel-tax cut (HD03236) + activity-coupled forestry (HD03242) undermine green brand at exactly the green-policy peak (HD03240)</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal effectiveness without US</strong> — limited operational caseload if US, China, major Global South do not cooperate</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE MITIGATION</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td><strong>Lantmäteriet bostadsregister IT delivery slip</strong> — Jan 2027 deadline (HD01CU28); political cost of delivery failure</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R8</strong></td><td><strong>Reparations-fatigue / decadal commitment burden</strong> (HD03232) — UNCC precedent suggests 30-year horizon; political-sustainability challenges</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8 / 25</strong> → <strong>7 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact">🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact">🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Coalition + Geopolitical Risks — Week 16
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -3667,7 +3667,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact">🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likeliho
     R7 Lantmäteriet IT slip: [0.55, 0.55]
     R8 Reparations fatigue: [0.35, 0.75]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--90-day-risk-calendar">📅 90-Day Risk Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--90-day-risk-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-90-day-risk-calendar">📅 90-Day Risk Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-risk-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3730,7 +3730,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--90-day-risk-calendar">📅 90-Day Risk Calendar<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger Event</th><th>Risk(s) Updated</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td>HD03236 chamber vote</td><td>R4 (coalition discipline test) · R5 (climate framing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-27</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>R2 + R4 (parliamentary accountability)</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>R2 (Bayesian decisive update)</td></tr><tr><td>May–Jun 2026</td><td>KU33/KU32 first chamber reading (vilande beslut)</td><td>R2 + R4</td></tr><tr><td>Late May / Jun 2026</td><td>Ukraine HD03231/HD03232 chamber vote</td><td>R1 (escalation trigger) · R6</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-Q3</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deploys to Finland</td><td>R1 (operational visibility ↑)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>V + C + MP file ECHR challenge on inhibition orders</td><td>R3 (litigation predicate)</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous (heightened)</td><td>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins, Nordic-Baltic intel</td><td>R1 (continuous monitoring)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-13</strong></td><td>General election</td><td>R2 (post-election Riksdag composition) · R4 (coalition arithmetic resets)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-Q4</td><td>Lantmäteriet IT procurement notice</td><td>R7 (delivery confirmation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-living-risks">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Living Risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-rules-living-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-rules-living-risks">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Living Risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-rules-living-risks"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong> (per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> §Bayesian Updating): each priority risk has named observable signals that trigger explicit prior/posterior updates. Failure to update post-trigger ⇒ stale risk inventory.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3888,7 +3888,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-living-risks">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Livi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Observable Signal</th><th align="center">Direction</th><th align="center">Magnitude</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Major cyber/sabotage event attributed to Russia</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+4 to +6</td><td>SÄPO bulletin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Quiet 6-month period</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Continuous</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>NATO Article 5 invocation by another member</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>NATO HQ</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Lagrådet strict scoping of "formellt tillförd bevisning"</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−4</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Lagrådet silent on interpretive test</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+4</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Press-freedom-NGO joint remissvar critical of language</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+1</td><td>SJF / TU / Utgivarna</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>UNHCR reports concerns on Swedish migration practice</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>UNHCR Sweden country report</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Government adds appeal mechanism in 2nd-reading amendment</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−4</td><td>SfU committee record</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Strasbourg admits V/C/MP case to merits</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>ECtHR docket</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>Successful close-vote (≤ 5-vote margin) post-JuU15</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+1 each</td><td>Voteringsregister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>SD parliamentary leader publicly threatens withdrawal</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>Public statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>L party-leader publicly distances from migration trio</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>Public statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Q3 2026 emissions-trajectory data (Naturvårdsverket) shows reversal</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>Naturvårdsverket bulletin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet flags fuel-tax-cut emissions impact</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+1</td><td>KPR annual report</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>US public tribunal endorsement</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−4</td><td>US State Department</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>First Russian official summoned by tribunal</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Council of Europe</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>US explicit non-participation statement</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>US official statement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet IT procurement notice published Q3 2026</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Lantmäteriet procurement portal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td>Procurement notice slip beyond Q3 2026</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>Procurement portal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R8</strong></td><td>First reparations-payment disbursement</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Damages Commission Secretariat</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong>: each risk has explicit treatment-ladder rungs. Mitigation success measured against ladder progress.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3953,7 +3953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Current Rung</th><th>Next Rung</th><th>Decision-Maker</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Heightened SÄPO/MSB posture; Nordic-Baltic intel coordination</td><td>Public-resilience information campaign + critical-infrastructure hardening audit</td><td>SÄPO + MSB + Justitiedepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO consultation</td><td>Statutory clarification of "formellt tillförd bevisning" in 2nd-reading amendment</td><td>Justitiedepartementet + KU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Government legal review; UNHCR consultation</td><td>Add explicit appeal-mechanism + judicial-review compatibility text</td><td>Justitiedepartementet + SfU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>Sequencing discipline post-JuU15; pre-vote SD-buy-in management</td><td>Cabinet-level coalition dialogue + L-party brand-management coordination</td><td>PM Office + SD parliamentary leader</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Communications strategy elevating HD03240 visibility</td><td>Compensatory climate-policy commitment (e.g. accelerated EV-charge investment)</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>Quiet US engagement; Council of Europe leadership</td><td>Bilateral state-cooperation agreements with G7 + EU members</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet capacity assessment; political backstop budget</td><td>Procurement supplier ramp-up + delivery-milestone publication</td><td>Lantmäteriet + Civilutskottet oversight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R8</strong></td><td>Reparations-secretariat staffing</td><td>Public-narrative discipline + multi-year budget commitment</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cascading-risk-map">🌊 Cascading Risk Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cascading-risk-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-map">🌊 Cascading Risk Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     R1["R1&#x3C;br/>Russian hybrid event"] --> CASCADE1["Public-confidence shock"]
     CASCADE1 --> R4["R4&#x3C;br/>Coalition fracture risk ↑"]
@@ -3984,7 +3984,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cascading-risk-map">🌊 Cascading Risk Map<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style NORM fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style MP_RISE fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability">🎯 Coalition-Fragility Quadrant (Operational Stability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability">🎯 Coalition-Fragility Quadrant (Operational Stability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Coalition Fragility — Per Issue Domain
     x-axis Tight Discipline --> Loose Discipline
@@ -4006,7 +4006,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability">🎯 Coalition-F
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: top-right quadrant (Migration trio + JuU15) = highest fragility under SD leverage; bottom-left (Ukraine + NATO + KU32) = stable consensus. Future-vote risk concentrates in top half. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4038,7 +4038,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Risk realisation pre-Sep 2026 disproportionately damages government incumbency narrative; R1 + R3 + R5 = highest pre-Sep impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>Continuity (P=0.50) preserves R8 burden but mitigates R4; S-led (P=0.35) renegotiates R3 + R5; S+V+MP (P=0.15) reverses KU33 ⇒ extinguishes R2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>R1 (security) + R5 (climate) most likely to enter voter consideration; R2 (constitutional) requires triggering case to register</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>R4 = most exposed if government close-vote tally rises; R3 = most exposed if Strasbourg ruling lands pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>R8 = decadal — reparations sustainment crosses multiple governments</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §T1–T8 = same risks viewed as government threats</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §T1 deep-dives R1 with STRIDE + Attack Tree</li>
@@ -4048,7 +4048,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if R1 trigger fires) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x (5×5 + Bayesian + ALARP + cascading)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4080,8 +4080,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SWOT-ID</strong></td><td>SWOT-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0 (TOWS interference + scenario branching + cross-bloc evaluation)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Lenses</strong></td><td>Government coalition (M+KD+L) + parliamentary support (SD); Opposition blocs (S; V; MP; C); Civil society / general public — <strong>6 distinct perspectives</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support">🎯 Government Coalition SWOT (M + KD + L + SD parliamentary support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--strengths">🟢 Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support">🎯 Government Coalition SWOT (M + KD + L + SD parliamentary support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">🟢 Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4130,7 +4130,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--strengths">🟢 Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1</strong></td><td><strong>Tidö working majority operationally validated</strong> — JuU15 vote 145–142, pure bloc, zero defections</td><td>JuU15 voteringsregister 2026-04-15 (chamber vote date per voteringsprotokoll; PR description's 2026-04-16 reflects publication date); HD03246</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S2</strong></td><td><strong>Comprehensive legislative agenda execution</strong> — fiscal trilogy + criminal-justice + migration + foreign-policy + energy delivered in single week</td><td>HD03100/0399/236; HD03246; SfU22; HD03231; HD03240</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3</strong></td><td><strong>NATO operational integration</strong> — first major Försvarsmakten deployment under eFP (1,200 troops to Finland); shifts from accession to operational posture</td><td>HD01UFöU3; UFöU committee record; Försvarsmakten timeline</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4</strong></td><td><strong>Cross-party Ukraine consensus</strong> — tribunal + reparations propositions enjoy near-universal support (~349 MPs); pre-empts SD/domestic opposition via Nuremberg framing</td><td>HD03231; HD03232; FM Stenergard verbatim 2026-04-16</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S5</strong></td><td><strong>Cost-of-living relief instrument</strong> — fuel-tax cut (82 öre) + el/gas relief responds to most-cited voter pain point</td><td>HD03236; KI Konjunkturinstitutet 2026-Q1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S6</strong></td><td><strong>Constitutional reform credibility</strong> — KU advancing both KU32 (rights-positive accessibility) + KU33 (investigative integrity) at first reading shows constitutional craftsmanship capacity</td><td>HD01KU32; HD01KU33; KU committee record</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--weaknesses">🟡 Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">🟡 Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4179,7 +4179,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--weaknesses">🟡 Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Razor-thin majority</strong> — 3-vote margin (145-142) in JuU15 = no slack for further close votes; one defection ⇒ government loses</td><td>JuU15 protokoll</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td><strong>Sweden underperforms Nordic peers</strong> on growth — 0.82 % 2024 vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 % (World Bank); narrative vulnerability</td><td><code>economic-data.json</code>; World Bank GDP series</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td><strong>Unemployment at 8.7 % 2025</strong> — highest since pandemic; structural challenge undermines fiscal-success framing</td><td><code>economic-data.json</code>; SCB AKU</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td><strong>Rhetorical self-contradiction</strong> — fuel-tax cut (HD03236) undercuts simultaneous green-transition narrative (HD03240 + HD03239); MP/V exploit-ready</td><td>HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239 juxtaposition; Klimatpolitiska rådet 2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>Press-freedom-abroad-vs-home contradiction</strong> — championing Nuremberg accountability (HD03231) while narrowing TF at home (HD01KU33)</td><td>TOWS S4 × T1; opposition rhetoric library</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W6</strong></td><td><strong>L-party identity strain</strong> under migration trio (SfU22 + 235 + 229) — Pehrson must defend liberal brand vs SD-driven tightening</td><td>SfU committee record; L party programme</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--opportunities">🔵 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">🔵 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4228,7 +4228,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--opportunities">🔵 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>O1</strong></td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneurship dividend</strong> from Ukraine tribunal — Sweden as Nordic accountability leader</td><td>HD03231; CoE framework</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O2</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition-stability narrative</strong> if fiscal package executes without further close votes through Q2/Q3</td><td>Voteringsregister; macro indicators</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O3</strong></td><td><strong>Cross-party constitutional statesmanship</strong> if S endorses Norway-style statutory triggers in KU33 second reading</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> §Nordic models</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O4</strong></td><td><strong>Energy modernisation legacy</strong> — Electricity System Act (HD03240) + wind power (HD03239) lay foundation for 2030 100 % renewable target</td><td>HD03240; HD03239</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O5</strong></td><td><strong>Anti-money-laundering positioning</strong> via housing reforms (HD01CU27 + HD01CU28) — international financial-integrity signalling</td><td>HD01CU27; HD01CU28; AMLD6</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O6</strong></td><td><strong>Re-election platform consolidation</strong> — fiscal + brott + ordning + försvar legislative blocks form coherent campaign architecture</td><td>HD03100; HD03246; HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4290,7 +4290,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid retaliation</strong> post-tribunal + NATO eFP — cyber, sabotage, disinformation, infrastructure harassment</td><td>SÄPO 2024 assessment; Baltic cable pattern; Finnish border instrumentalisation 2023–24</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> — interpretive-frontier risk on "formellt tillförd bevisning"; chilling effect on investigative journalism</td><td>HD01KU33 betänkande; press-freedom NGO joint statement</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Migration trio ECHR strike-down</strong> — V/C/MP counter-motion text shows coordinated Strasbourg-litigation predicate</td><td>SfU22 + counter-motions; ECHR Article 8 + 13</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition fracture under SD pressure</strong> — 145-142 = SD as kingmaker on every paragraph; future close votes risky</td><td>JuU15 protokoll; SD parliamentary leverage</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>US tribunal non-cooperation</strong> — undermines tribunal effectiveness and Swedish founding-member credibility</td><td>Public statements; ICC US history</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Climate-credibility erosion</strong> — fuel-tax cut + activity-coupled forestry rules (HD03242) undermine green brand</td><td>HD03236; HD03242; Klimatpolitiska rådet</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>Q3 2026 macro shock</strong> — fiscal stimulus fails to translate to measurable growth/employment improvement</td><td>KI prognos 2026-Q1; macro lag-time analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Lantmäteriet IT delivery slip</strong> — bostadsregister (HD01CU28) Jan 2027 deadline at risk; political cost of delivery failure</td><td>Lantmäteriet capacity assessment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix">🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix">🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong> (per <code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0): cross-quadrant interactions surface strategic centres of gravity that vanilla SWOT misses.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -4362,8 +4362,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix">🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant In
 <li><strong>Russian-hybrid response capacity</strong> (S4 × T1; O1 × T1) — security variable</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives">🌈 Stakeholder SWOT — 6 Distinct Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson">🟦 S — Socialdemokraterna (Magdalena Andersson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives">🌈 Stakeholder SWOT — 6 Distinct Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson">🟦 S — Socialdemokraterna (Magdalena Andersson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4395,7 +4395,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson">🟦 S — Socialdemokrat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living + Nordic-GDP-gap critique armed with World Bank data</td><td>Counter-budget can frame fiscal-stewardship failure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Internal split on KU33 (gäng-agenda alignment vs press-freedom tradition)</td><td>Andersson personal position is decisive variable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Ukraine consensus participation = statesmanship credit; possible KU33 cross-party negotiation</td><td>Both available without giving up core identity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If KU33 second-reading strategy mishandled, alienates V/MP coalition partners post-Sep</td><td>Tactical care required</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar">🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Nooshi Dadgostar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar">🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Nooshi Dadgostar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4427,7 +4427,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar">🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Noo
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Clear ideological position against migration trio + KU33 + fiscal package</td><td>Mobilises base efficiently</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Limited coalition leverage; voter ceiling ~9-10 %</td><td>Dependent on S to operationalise positions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33 (FRA-lagen 2008 precedent suggests 0.5-1.5 pp)</td><td>Single-issue framing possible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Russia's tribunal-retaliation narrative could divide V (anti-NATO faction vs accountability faction)</td><td>Internal management challenge</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok">🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharrem Demirok)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok">🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharrem Demirok)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok">🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharre
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Migration-counter-motion authority (rural / liberal voter coalition); fiscal alternatives credibility</td><td>Strategic position between blocs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Stuck below 5 % parliamentary threshold in some polls; existential risk</td><td>Must differentiate vs both blocs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>KU33 cross-party leverage (could broker stricter language in second reading)</td><td>Statesmanship moment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If migration counter-motion fails Strasbourg, brand damaged</td><td>Litigation-risk exposure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson">🟠 SD — Sverigedemokraterna (Jimmie Åkesson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson">🟠 SD — Sverigedemokraterna (Jimmie Åkesson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4491,7 +4491,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson">🟠 SD — Sverigedemokrat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Migration trio = direct policy delivery for SD-base; JuU15 145-142 confirms kingmaker leverage</td><td>Tidö-deal cashing in</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>No formal cabinet seats = limited credit-claiming on broad agenda</td><td>Wants more visible policy ownership</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Further coalition leverage on next contentious vote; potentially Cabinet entry post-Sep</td><td>Strategic patience</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If Russian hybrid escalation ⇒ campaign reframes to security ⇒ SD's traditional issue ownership questioned</td><td>Brand vulnerability</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén">🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel Helldén)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén">🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel Helldén)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4523,7 +4523,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén">🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Unique green-credibility; KU33 + migration trio both align with MP identity</td><td>Voter-attentive items</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Bloc dependency on S; ceiling ~6-7 %; no cabinet in 4 years</td><td>Operational constraints</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Electricity System Act + wind-power municipal share offer climate-policy gains MP can claim</td><td>Constructive engagement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Russian hybrid-event reshapes campaign agenda away from climate</td><td>External shock risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--civil-society--general-public">👥 Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--civil-society--general-public"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society--general-public">👥 Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society--general-public"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4556,7 +4556,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--civil-society--general-public">👥 Civil Society / General Public<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Broad-based access to relief (fuel + el/gas + welfare); Ukrainian solidarity high; NATO membership consensus</td><td>Public legitimacy strong</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living pain real (8.7 % unemp); regional inequality (sydöstra Skåne, HD11718); domestic-violence services strain (HD10438)</td><td>Distributional concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Bostadsregister + AML housing reforms could improve market integrity</td><td>Welfare-state modernisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>KU33 chilling effect could reduce investigative journalism; Russian hybrid could disrupt critical infrastructure</td><td>Institutional resilience risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid">🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid">🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOV["🟦 Government&#x3C;br/>M + KD + L&#x3C;br/>(151 seats)"]
     SD["🟠 SD&#x3C;br/>parliamentary support&#x3C;br/>(73 seats)"]
@@ -4627,7 +4627,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid">🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Merma
     style BUDGET fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style ENERGY fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rules 5–6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rules 5–6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4665,7 +4665,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56">🗳️ Elec
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication for Government Coalition</th><th>Implication for Opposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy + JuU15 + NATO eFP form coherent campaign block; KU33 a manageable secondary risk</td><td>S best-positioned to capture cost-of-living; V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33; C-survival depends on differentiation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>Continuity (P=0.50) preserves agenda; close-vote risk persists</td><td>S-led minority (P=0.35) plausible; S+V+MP (P=0.15) blocks KU33 second reading</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living + brott + ordning + försvar = government's selling deck</td><td>Climate + welfare + civil rights = opposition's deck</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Nordic-GDP gap + climate self-contradiction + cross-cluster tension</td><td>Universal-Ukraine consensus precludes effective opposition there</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>Fiscal annual + JuU15 4-year + KU33 decadal + NATO eFP strategic</td><td>Counter-motions establish opposition record but no immediate policy legacy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Top-5 Findings + §TOWS Cross-Cluster Interference</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1 + §R3 trace from T1 + T3 above</li>
@@ -4676,7 +4676,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0 (TOWS + cross-bloc + scenario-branching)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4708,7 +4708,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>THR-ID</strong></td><td>THR-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0 (STRIDE · Attack Tree · Cyber Kill Chain · Diamond Model · Political Threat Taxonomy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat Inventory</strong></td><td>3 priority vectors decomposed multi-framework + 4 watch-list</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-priority-threat-vectors">🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-priority-threat-vectors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-priority-threat-vectors">🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-priority-threat-vectors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4744,8 +4744,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-priority-threat-vectors">🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Vector</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Frameworks Applied</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid retaliation</strong> post-tribunal (HD03231) + NATO eFP (HD01UFöU3)</td><td align="center">🔴 CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>STRIDE + Cyber Kill Chain + Diamond Model</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Constitutional accountability gap</strong> — KU33 narrowing + opposition rhetorical exposure</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Attack Tree + Political Threat Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Migration-trio ECHR challenge</strong> — V/C/MP coordinated litigation against SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Attack Tree + STRIDE on legal-process integrity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation">🧨 T1 — Russian Hybrid Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stride-decomposition">STRIDE Decomposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-decomposition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation">🧨 T1 — Russian Hybrid Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stride-decomposition">STRIDE Decomposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-decomposition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4794,7 +4794,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stride-decomposition">STRIDE Decomposition<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Letter</th><th>Threat Class</th><th>Manifestation in T1</th><th align="center">Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong></td><td>Spoofing</td><td>Disinformation impersonating Swedish government, parties, journalists — election-disinformation campaigns</td><td align="center">🔴</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong></td><td>Tampering</td><td>Cyber-intrusion of public-sector + critical-infrastructure systems (energy, water, hospitals)</td><td align="center">🔴</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong></td><td>Repudiation</td><td>Plausibly-deniable proxy operations (e.g. via third-country actors); attribution lag</td><td align="center">🟠</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong></td><td>Info Disclosure</td><td>Leak of classified materials to embarrass government or foment internal division</td><td align="center">🟠</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong></td><td>DoS</td><td>DDoS attacks on Riksdag, Försvarsmakten, Valmyndigheten, energy grid</td><td align="center">🟠</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong></td><td>Elevation of Privilege</td><td>Compromise of Försvarsmakten / SÄPO operational systems via supply-chain or credential attacks</td><td align="center">🔴</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL["🎯 Adversary Goal:&#x3C;br/>Degrade Swedish capacity&#x3C;br/>to support Ukraine + advance NATO eFP"]
     
@@ -4845,7 +4845,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     style L2C1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style L2D1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style L2B1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant">Cyber Kill Chain (Election-Disinformation Variant)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant">Cyber Kill Chain (Election-Disinformation Variant)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4892,7 +4892,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant">Cyber Kill Chain (E
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Manifestation</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Reconnaissance</td><td>Map Swedish political fault-lines (KU33 press-freedom, fuel-tax cut climate tension, migration trio)</td><td>OSINT defensive monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>2. Weaponisation</td><td>Build deep-fake content; create amplification networks</td><td>MSB / SÄPO offensive intel</td></tr><tr><td>3. Delivery</td><td>Social media + alternative-media seeding</td><td>Platform partnerships</td></tr><tr><td>4. Exploitation</td><td>Trigger campaign narrative shift away from Sweden's chosen frames</td><td>Media-literacy programmes</td></tr><tr><td>5. Installation</td><td>Establish persistent disinformation channels</td><td>Platform takedowns</td></tr><tr><td>6. Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Coordinate amplification waves with offline events</td><td>Intel-sharing with Nordic-Baltic partners</td></tr><tr><td>7. Actions on Objectives</td><td>Reduce coalition margins; suppress voter turnout in critical demographics</td><td>Civil-society resilience programmes</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-diamond-model">Diamond Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diamond-model">Diamond Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4919,7 +4919,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-diamond-model">Diamond Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Vertex</th><th>Identification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Adversary</strong></td><td>GRU Unit 26165 (cyber); FSB (HUMINT + influence); Internet Research Agency successors (disinformation); proxy actors (RT, Sputnik successors)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Capability</strong></td><td>Established cyber-offensive (NotPetya 2017, SolarWinds 2020, Viasat 2022); industrial-scale disinformation; demonstrated infrastructure-sabotage capacity (Nord Stream pipelines 2022 contested)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Infrastructure</strong></td><td>C2 servers in third countries; social-media bot networks; insider-threat recruiters in diaspora communities</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Victim</strong></td><td>Swedish public sector + critical infrastructure + election integrity + civil-society confidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-mitigation-status">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mitigation-status">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4974,7 +4974,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-mitigation-status">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Mitigation</th><th>Owner</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SÄPO threat-actor monitoring</td><td>SÄPO</td><td align="center">🟢 Active (heightened)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>MSB civil-defence preparedness</td><td>MSB</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Critical-infrastructure hardening (NIS2)</td><td>Sektorsmyndigheter</td><td align="center">🟡 Implementation phase</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Election-infrastructure security</td><td>Valmyndigheten + SÄPO</td><td align="center">🟡 Pre-2026 hardening</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic-Baltic intel sharing</td><td>NORDEFCO + NIC</td><td align="center">🟢 Operational</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-society resilience programmes</td><td>MSB + Civil Defence Agency</td><td align="center">🟡 Underway</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Public information campaign (resilience)</td><td>MSB</td><td align="center">🟡 Planned for 2026</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-source-attribution">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-source-attribution">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SÄPO Annual Open Threat Assessment 2024</li>
 <li>Försvarsmakten MUST quarterly briefings (open elements)</li>
@@ -4983,8 +4983,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-source-attribution">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>Hybrid CoE (Helsinki) — Russian sub-conventional operations dataset</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing">🧨 T2 — Constitutional Accountability Gap (KU33 Narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion">Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing">🧨 T2 — Constitutional Accountability Gap (KU33 Narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion">Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL2["🎯 Threat Goal:&#x3C;br/>Reduce investigative-journalism capacity&#x3C;br/>over Swedish public sector"]
     
@@ -5033,7 +5033,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion">Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion
     style A3 fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style A1_1 fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style A4_3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5065,7 +5065,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Taxonomy Class</th><th align="center">Match</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Democratic-process integrity</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Press-freedom infrastructure compromise</td></tr><tr><td>Rule-of-law durability</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Grundlag narrowing without complete second-reading certainty</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-liberties baseline</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Investigative-journalism precondition</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-process security</td><td align="center">🟨 partial</td><td>Indirect via campaign rhetoric reframing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-1">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mitigation-status-1">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5102,7 +5102,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-1">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Mitigation</th><th>Owner</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet engagement</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom NGO coordination</td><td>SJF / TU / Utgivarna</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Statutory clarity in 2nd-reading amendment</td><td>KU + Justitiedepartementet</td><td align="center">🟡 Pending</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>International benchmark adoption (Norway-style triggers)</td><td>KU</td><td align="center">🟡 Available, not adopted</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-source-attribution-1">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-source-attribution-1">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>KU committee record HD01KU33</li>
 <li>Press-freedom NGO joint statement 2026-Q2 (forthcoming)</li>
@@ -5110,8 +5110,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-source-attribution-1">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>BVerfG Staatstrojaner ruling (1 BvR 2664/17, 2019) for comparative reasoning</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge">🧨 T3 — Migration-Trio ECHR Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate">Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge">🧨 T3 — Migration-Trio ECHR Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate">Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL3["🎯 Counter-Goal:&#x3C;br/>Reverse SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229&#x3C;br/>via Strasbourg ruling"]
 
@@ -5141,7 +5141,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate">Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)<
     style P5a fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style P5b fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style P5c fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity">STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity">STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5183,7 +5183,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity">STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Letter</th><th>Concern</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong> (Spoofing)</td><td>Misrepresentation of UNHCR or ECHR positions in domestic debate</td><td>Verbatim citation discipline</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong> (Tampering)</td><td>Procedural irregularities in inhibition-order issuance</td><td>JO + Justitiekanslern oversight</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong> (Repudiation)</td><td>Government denial of practice patterns</td><td>SfU + Regeringsförhör accountability</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong> (Info Disclosure)</td><td>Unauthorised release of asylum-seeker case data</td><td>DPO oversight per GDPR</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong> (DoS)</td><td>Court backlog in admissibility processing</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen capacity</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong> (Elev. Privilege)</td><td>Police authority over inhibition orders without judicial pre-review</td><td>Judicial-review compatibility text</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-2">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mitigation-status-2">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5215,7 +5215,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-2">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Mitigation</th><th>Owner</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government legal review</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td></tr><tr><td>Appeal-mechanism build-out</td><td>Justitiedepartementet + SfU</td><td align="center">🟡 Considered</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial-review compatibility text</td><td>KU + Lagrådet</td><td align="center">🟡 Pending</td></tr><tr><td>UNHCR consultation discipline</td><td>UD</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-source-attribution-2">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-source-attribution-2">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SfU22 betänkande</li>
 <li>V + C + MP counter-motion text</li>
@@ -5224,7 +5224,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-source-attribution-2">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>UNHCR Sweden country report</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--watch-list-threats-periodic-review">🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodic Review)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--watch-list-threats-periodic-review"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-watch-list-threats-periodic-review">🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodic Review)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-watch-list-threats-periodic-review"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5262,7 +5262,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--watch-list-threats-periodic-review">🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Likelihood (now)</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T4</strong></td><td>Coalition fracture leading to election trigger</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Monitor close votes; SD-relations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T5</strong></td><td>US public non-cooperation on Ukraine tribunal</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">UD bilateral track</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T6</strong></td><td>Climate-credibility erosion enabling MP/V attentive-voter mobilisation</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">Communications strategy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T7</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet IT-delivery failure on bostadsregister</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Procurement-portal monitoring</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5294,7 +5294,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>T1 (Russian hybrid) most likely to reshape campaign agenda if event materialises; T2 (KU33) requires triggering case to register publicly; T3 (ECHR) damages government legal credibility if struck down pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>T1 event ⇒ security-frame consensus expands ⇒ government continuity probability ↑; T3 strike-down ⇒ S-led minority more plausible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>T1 = top-tier salience if event; T2 = low unless catalysed; T3 = medium if Strasbourg ruling pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Government vs T1 (preparedness narrative) + T3 (legal arrogance critique); Opposition vs T2 (constitutional craftsmanship critique) + T6 (climate critique)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>T1 mitigation = decadal security-architecture investment; T2 = decadal grundlag durability; T3 = ECHR jurisprudence shapes future migration-policy boundaries</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1 + §R2 + §R3 = same threats viewed as risk register</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §Wildcards = T1 + T3 escalation paths (W1 → T1 Russian hybrid; W2 → T3 ECHR strike-down)</li>
@@ -5304,7 +5304,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if T1 trigger fires) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0 (STRIDE + Attack Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond + Political Threat Taxonomy)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5340,13 +5340,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>Week 16, 2026 (2026-04-11 → 2026-04-17)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (Comparative Benchmarking) + Nordic + EU baseline references</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jurisdictions</strong></td><td>6 — Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, United Kingdom (+ Ireland, Estonia for migration / digital cluster)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Sources</strong></td><td>World Bank (<code>economic-data.json</code>); RSF Press Freedom Index 2025; OECD; Eurostat; national parliament sources</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>A reference-grade analysis must <strong>benchmark against ≥ 5 jurisdictions</strong> so that Swedish developments are interpreted in context, not in isolation. This file places Week 16's six clusters against Nordic + EU peers, and identifies where Sweden <em>innovates</em>, where it <em>follows</em>, and where it <em>diverges</em>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5403,7 +5403,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2024</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2023</th><th align="center">Unemployment 2025</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.82 %</strong></td><td align="center">−0.20 %</td><td align="center"><strong>8.69 %</strong></td><td>Lowest Nordic GDP; unemployment at 5-year high</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">3.48 %</td><td align="center">2.50 %</td><td align="center">~5.6 %</td><td>Highest Nordic GDP — pharma/Novo Nordisk effect</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">2.10 %</td><td align="center">0.50 %</td><td align="center">~3.8 %</td><td>Stable; sovereign-wealth buffer</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">0.42 %</td><td align="center">−0.96 %</td><td align="center">~8.4 %</td><td>Sweden-comparable trajectory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany (EU benchmark)</strong></td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">~3.0 %</td><td>EU sluggish; Mittelstand challenges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">~0.9 %</td><td align="center">0.1 %</td><td align="center">~4.4 %</td><td>Comparable to Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden's 0.82 % growth in 2024 — vs Denmark's 3.48 % — is the <strong>single largest empirical vulnerability</strong> in the government's economic-stewardship narrative. Finland tracks similarly poorly. The fiscal trilogy is a stimulus response to a structural underperformance gap.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison">Fiscal Stance Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison">Fiscal Stance Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5442,8 +5442,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison">Fiscal Stance Comparison<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 Fiscal Stance</th><th align="center">Comparable to HD03236?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Mild stimulus (vårproposition + extra ändringsbudget; fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief + försvarsanslag)</td><td align="center">Reference</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Restrictive (surplus discipline; carbon fee retained; defence ↑)</td><td align="center">Sweden has <em>less</em> restrictive stance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Moderate (oil-fund withdrawal at structural rate; carbon-fee adjusted)</td><td align="center">Norway's carbon-fee discipline contrasts Sweden's fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Cautious-restrictive (debt-brake compatible)</td><td align="center">Sweden uses more political fiscal space</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Cautious; Schuldenbremse constraint</td><td align="center">Sweden has more fiscal flexibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Among Nordic peers, Denmark + Norway retain <strong>carbon-pricing discipline</strong> even while supporting cost-of-living relief through other instruments. Sweden's fuel-tax-cut approach is a Nordic outlier. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025">Press-Freedom Baseline (RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025">Press-Freedom Baseline (RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5497,7 +5497,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025">Press-Free
 <li><strong>Sweden uniquely uses constitutional (grundlag) status</strong> for press-freedom architecture; KU33 is a <strong>constitutional</strong> change, not statutory. Norway and Denmark have more flexibility because their architecture is statutory.</li>
 <li>The <strong>interpretive variable "formellt tillförd bevisning"</strong> has no direct Nordic peer term — its definition strictness is the primary determinant of post-KU33 press-freedom outcomes.</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context">EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context">EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5536,7 +5536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context">EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Contex
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>EAA Implementation Status</th><th>Constitutional or Statutory?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>KU32 = <strong>constitutional grundlag entrenchment</strong></td><td>Constitutional</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>BFSG 2022 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Ordonnance 2023-839 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Wet toegankelijkheid 2022 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>EAA 2023 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden is the <strong>only EU jurisdiction implementing EAA at constitutional grundlag level</strong> — uniquely strong rights protection but creates path-dependence for amendments. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context">⚖️ C3 — Criminal Justice (JuU15) in Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context">⚖️ C3 — Criminal Justice (JuU15) in Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5575,8 +5575,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context">⚖️ C3 — Crimi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Juvenile-offender age threshold</th><th align="center">Remand max</th><th>Recent tightening</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">15 (criminal responsibility); JuU15 extends remand + earlier responsibility assessment</td><td align="center">Extended via JuU15</td><td>🟢 2026 (Tidö centerpiece)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">15; lowered by 2010 reform from 14 + reverted in 2012</td><td align="center">Standard</td><td>Recent tightening 2018+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">15; emphasis on rehab</td><td align="center">Standard</td><td>Limited change</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">15; rehabilitation-focus</td><td align="center">Standard</td><td>Stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden's juvenile-offender tightening tracks Denmark + UK trends; Norway + Finland retain rehabilitation focus. The JuU15 145-142 vote suggests significant cross-Nordic divergence is now established. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp">🌍 C4 — Ukraine Accountability + NATO eFP<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232">Tribunal Architecture Participation (HD03231 / HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp">🌍 C4 — Ukraine Accountability + NATO eFP<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232">Tribunal Architecture Participation (HD03231 / HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5639,7 +5639,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232">Tribunal Archit
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Founding member of Special Tribunal?</th><th align="center">Damages Commission member?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">✅ (HD03231)</td><td align="center">✅ (HD03232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">✅ (non-EU)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (ambiguous — concerns over reciprocity)</td><td align="center">Partial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (target state)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td><strong>China</strong></td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Tribunal has <strong>broad European participation</strong> but key great-power gaps. Sweden's founding-member status places it squarely in the Nordic + EU consensus; risk R6 (effectiveness without US) is <strong>shared with all participants</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions">NATO eFP (Enhanced Forward Presence) Country Contributions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions">NATO eFP (Enhanced Forward Presence) Country Contributions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5703,8 +5703,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions">NATO eFP (E
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>eFP Battle Group Participation</th><th align="center">Operational Year of Maturity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td>Lead nation Poland; multiple BG contributions</td><td align="center">2017+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United Kingdom</strong></td><td>Lead nation Estonia</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Lead nation Latvia</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Lead nation Lithuania; <strong>Slovakia 2024+</strong></td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Lead nation Romania (2022); contributions Estonia</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Italy</strong></td><td>Lead nation Bulgaria (2022)</td><td align="center">2022</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Major contributor Lithuania</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>NATO since April 2023; recipient + contributor</td><td align="center">2024+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Contributor multiple BGs</td><td align="center">2017+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>NATO since March 2024; <strong>eFP Finland 1,200 troops 2026-Q3 (HD01UFöU3)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>2026</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden is among the <strong>last NATO members to operationalise</strong> post-accession (March 2024 → Q3 2026 ≈ 30-month accession-to-operations cycle, comparable to Finland's 2023→2024 cycle of ≈14 months). Faster Finnish operationalisation reflects geographic urgency vs Sweden's strategic-depth role.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context">🛂 C5 — Migration / Rights Tightening in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue">Inhibition-Order Equivalents (SfU22 analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context">🛂 C5 — Migration / Rights Tightening in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue">Inhibition-Order Equivalents (SfU22 analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5749,8 +5749,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue">Inhibition-Order Equival
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Inhibition-order regime</th><th align="center">Appeal mechanism</th><th align="center">ECHR challenges</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>HD01SfU22 — new regime; appeal mechanism contested</td><td align="center">🟡 Limited</td><td align="center">V/C/MP-prepared</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Similar (Udlændingelov § 32 + 36); strong appeal mechanism</td><td align="center">🟢 Yes</td><td align="center">Some past challenges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>UK Borders Act 2007 — extensive inhibition orders</td><td align="center">🟡 Limited</td><td align="center">Multiple ECHR cases (NA v UK 2008+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Aufenthaltsgesetz — moderately strong</td><td align="center">🟢 Yes</td><td align="center">BVerwG precedents</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Vw 2000 — moderate</td><td align="center">🟢 Yes</td><td align="center">Limited ECHR challenges</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's HD01SfU22 + Prop 235/229 push Swedish migration policy toward UK + Danish models. The <strong>appeal-mechanism gap is the primary ECHR-vulnerability variable</strong>. Adding judicial-review compatibility would significantly reduce R3 / W2 magnitude.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context">⚡ C6 — Energy + Housing + Sector Reforms in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240">Electricity-System Reform (HD03240)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context">⚡ C6 — Energy + Housing + Sector Reforms in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240">Electricity-System Reform (HD03240)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5788,7 +5788,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240">Electricity-System Reform (HD03240
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Recent comprehensive Electricity Act?</th><th align="center">Smart-grid integration</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">HD03240 — comprehensive rewrite 2026</td><td align="center">Smart-grid + storage + prosumer rights</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">EnWG amendments ongoing</td><td align="center">Smart-grid significant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">Continuous statutory updates</td><td align="center">Strong wind-integration</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">Statlig regulering Energiloven</td><td align="center">Hydro-dominant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">Sähkömarkkinalaki 2013 + revisions</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden's HD03240 places Swedish electricity legislation on par with German + Danish modernisation; the legislative-coherence step is overdue. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative">Bostadsregister (HD01CU28) — AML Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative">Bostadsregister (HD01CU28) — AML Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5827,8 +5827,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative">Bostadsregister (HD01CU28)
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Comprehensive housing register</th><th align="center">AML coverage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">HD01CU28 — Jan 2027 target</td><td align="center"><strong>First time</strong> for bostadsrätter</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">Tinglysning + ejendomsregister</td><td align="center">Long-established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">Land Registry + Companies House BO register</td><td align="center">Strong AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">Kadaster + UBO register</td><td align="center">Strong AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estonia</strong></td><td align="center">Kinnistusraamat</td><td align="center">Digital-first</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden is <strong>catching up</strong> on bostadsrätter visibility. The Lantmäteriet IT-delivery dependency (R7) determines actual implementation. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1">🛡️ Russian Hybrid Response Comparative (calibrating R1 / T1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents">Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid Incidents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1">🛡️ Russian Hybrid Response Comparative (calibrating R1 / T1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents">Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid Incidents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5873,7 +5873,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents">Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Incident</th><th align="center">Year</th><th>Sweden-relevant lesson</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Border instrumentalisation (asylum seekers driven to crossings)</td><td align="center">2023–24</td><td>Sweden could face similar via Finnmark</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estonia</strong></td><td>Multiple cyber attacks; border tension</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Election-disinformation precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lithuania</strong></td><td>Belarus-coordinated border pressure</td><td align="center">2021–24</td><td>Cross-border coordination capacity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Grindavik gas-pipeline + cable surveillance</td><td align="center">2022–25</td><td>Critical-infrastructure exposure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Baltic-cable incidents (e.g. Hong Kong-flagged ship 2024)</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Nordic-wide pattern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden faces a <strong>Nordic-Baltic baseline pattern</strong> of hybrid pressure. R1 magnitude calibration places Sweden <strong>above Norway</strong> (less direct exposure) and <strong>comparable to Finland</strong> (similar vulnerability to instrumentalisation + cyber). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5905,7 +5905,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Comparative Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Sweden's economic-stewardship narrative challenged by Nordic-GDP-gap data; Denmark's success is rhetorical reference for opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>S-led coalition structure resembles current Danish + Norwegian models; mid-2020s Norden trend</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living + climate salience in Sweden tracks Finland; differs from Denmark (where climate-policy is more consensual)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Sweden's outlier status on fuel-tax-cut (vs DK + NO carbon-pricing discipline) is opposition-exploitable in cross-Nordic comparison</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>KU33 places Sweden on Nordic baseline; implementation-strictness (formellt tillförd bevisning) determines whether Sweden remains a press-freedom leader</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines">📊 Summary Table — Sweden's Position vs Nordic + EU Baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines">📊 Summary Table — Sweden's Position vs Nordic + EU Baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5979,7 +5979,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines">📊 Summar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden vs Nordic peers</th><th>Sweden vs EU baselines</th><th align="center">Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP growth 2024</td><td><strong>Below DK + NO; comparable to FI</strong></td><td>Comparable to UK + DE</td><td align="center">🔴 Underperforms</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom architecture</td><td><strong>Stricter (constitutional)</strong></td><td>Stricter</td><td align="center">🟢 Leader</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom outcome (RSF)</td><td>Among top-5</td><td>Top quintile</td><td align="center">🟢 Leader</td></tr><tr><td>Juvenile-offender tightening</td><td>Tracks DK trend</td><td>Tracks UK trend</td><td align="center">🟡 Following</td></tr><tr><td>Migration tightening</td><td>Tracks DK + UK</td><td>Tracks general EU restrictiveness 2024+</td><td align="center">🟡 Following</td></tr><tr><td>Electricity-system reform</td><td>Tracks DE + DK</td><td>Tracks EU baseline</td><td align="center">🟡 Catching up</td></tr><tr><td>Bostadsrätter AML coverage</td><td>Behind DK + Estonia</td><td>Behind UK</td><td align="center">🟡 Catching up</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP operationalisation</td><td>Behind FI; comparable to other late accession</td><td>Behind US/UK</td><td align="center">🟡 Following</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal participation</td><td>Founding member among Nordic + EU</td><td>Founding member among 30+ jurisdictions</td><td align="center">🟢 Leader</td></tr><tr><td>Carbon-pricing discipline</td><td><strong>Below DK + NO</strong> (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>Below EU baseline</td><td align="center">🔴 Outlier-down</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1 calibration uses Nordic/Baltic precedents</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §W1 wildcard derives from Finland 2023–24 instrumentalised migration</li>
@@ -5990,7 +5990,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (Comparative Benchmarking) + World Bank + RSF + national parliament references</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6022,7 +6022,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 (CIA triad + sensitivity tier + domain taxonomy + urgency matrix)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Classified</strong></td><td>28 (23 weekly significant + 5 supplementary)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6055,7 +6055,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classif
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Definition</th><th>Documents This Week</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🔴 P0 — Constitutional / Critical</strong></td><td>Grundlag amendments; democratic-infrastructure changes; reversal window decadal</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟠 P1 — Strategic National</strong></td><td>Foreign-policy treaty accession; major fiscal commitments; criminal-justice frame; security operations</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03231, HD03232, HD03246, HD01SfU22, HD01UFöU3, Prop 235, Prop 229</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟡 P2 — Sector / Regulated</strong></td><td>Energy, housing, accessibility, sector-specific reforms</td><td>HD03240, HD03245, HD03237, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD03244, HD03242, HD03239, HD03233</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟢 P3 — Routine / Administrative</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen reports, motions, EU directive transposition, interpellations</td><td>HD024098, HD01CU22, HD01CU42, HD10437, HD10438, HD11718, HD11719</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Where CIA = <strong>C</strong>onfidentiality (information protection / institutional secrecy), <strong>I</strong>ntegrity (rule-of-law durability + transparency), <strong>A</strong>vailability (citizen access to rights / services). Scored ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -6255,7 +6255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Confidentiality</th><th align="center">Integrity</th><th align="center">Availability</th><th align="center">Net Democratic Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (raises confidentiality of police-seized digital material)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (narrows transparency / "allmän handling")</td><td align="center">🟧 M (citizens lose insight into investigations)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on transparency</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M (no change)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rights-positive — accessibility entrenched in grundlag)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (citizens with disabilities gain access)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>Net positive on rights</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 (Vårproposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (fiscal accountability framework intact)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (welfare delivery + relief)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399 / HD03236</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (fuel + el/gas relief)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (JuU15)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (juvenile-data confidentiality concerns from longer remand)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (extends carceral state vs rehab)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (police investigative capacity ↑; juvenile rights ↓)</td><td align="center">🟧 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 (Tribunal)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rule-of-law + accountability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (no direct citizen impact)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 (Damages Comm.)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (reparations rule-of-law architecture)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22 (Inhibition)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces appeal mechanism)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (asylum-seeker access ↓)</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative on rights (ECHR risk)</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235 (Deportation)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces procedural protection)</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative on rights</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229 (Reception law)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (eligibility narrowed)</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3 (NATO eFP)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (military operational secrecy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (NATO Article 5 credibility)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (förändrar säkerhetsläget)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (Electricity Sys)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (legal coherence ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (smart-grid investment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239 (Wind power municipal)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H (municipal revenue + climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245 (Strategy violence)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (victim privacy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H (services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237 (Police training)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (recruitment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (police capacity)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27 (Lagfart + AML)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (data integrity)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (AML enforcement ↑)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (consumer protection ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 (Bostadsregister)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (register data)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (market integrity ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (bostadsrätter buyers)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244 (Interoperability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (cross-agency services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242 (Forestry)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Mixed (climate trade-off)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233 (Anti-fraud)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (consumer protection)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098 (Counter-budget motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 —</td><td align="center">🟢 —</td><td align="center">🟢 —</td><td align="center">Procedural</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU22 / HD01CU42</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (Riksrevisionen oversight)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437 (Lönetransparens)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438 (Kvinnojourer)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (services at risk)</td><td align="center">🟥 Concern</td></tr><tr><td>HD11718 (Statlig närvaro Skåne)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Procedural</td></tr><tr><td>HD11719 (Skattekrav prostitution)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟥 L (victim re-victimisation risk)</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative for victims</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-distribution">🌐 Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-distribution">🌐 Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Documents by Policy Domain — Week 16
     "Constitutional / Democratic Infrastructure" : 2
     "Fiscal / Economic" : 4
@@ -6268,7 +6268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--domain-distribution">🌐 Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden
     "Digital / Telecom" : 2
     "Other" : 2</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-pre-election-significance-distribution">🎚️ Pre-Election Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-pre-election-significance-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-election-significance-distribution">🎚️ Pre-Election Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-significance-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6306,7 +6306,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-pre-election-significance-distribution">🎚️ Pre-Election Sign
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Salience to Sep 2026 Election</th><th>Documents</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03246, HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">5</td></tr><tr><td>🟩 <strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD03231, HD01SfU22, Prop 235, Prop 229, HD03245</td><td align="center">7</td></tr><tr><td>🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>HD03232, HD03240, HD03237, HD03239, HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>🟥 <strong>LOW</strong></td><td>HD03244, HD03242, HD03233, HD024098, HD01CU22, HD01CU42, HD10437, HD11718</td><td align="center">8</td></tr><tr><td>⬛ <strong>VERY LOW</strong></td><td>HD10438, HD11719 (procedural relevance)</td><td align="center">2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-urgency-matrix">⏱️ Urgency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-urgency-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-urgency-matrix">⏱️ Urgency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6339,7 +6339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-urgency-matrix">⏱️ Urgency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision Horizon</th><th>Documents</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Immediate (≤ 7 days)</strong></td><td>HD03236 chamber vote 2026-04-22; KU annual hearings 2026-04-27</td><td>Live monitoring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Near (30 days)</strong></td><td>Lagrådet KU32/KU33 yttrande Q2; chamber votes on KU and Ukraine</td><td>Track for editorial follow-up</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Medium (90 days)</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Q3 deployment; budget execution data</td><td>Forward-watch list</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Long (1+ years)</strong></td><td>KU33 second reading; ECHR ruling; tribunal first case</td><td>Post-election briefings</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-rationale">🔐 Classification Rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-rationale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-rationale">🔐 Classification Rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-rationale"></a></h3>
 <p>All 28 documents classified <strong>Public</strong> under <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md"><code>Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION.md</code></a>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents already published by Riksdagen / Regeringskansliet</li>
@@ -6350,7 +6350,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-rationale">🔐 Classification Rationale<a class="" a
 <p><strong>Classification Internal would apply to</strong> (none in this run): pre-disclosure embargoed material, source-protected intelligence.
 <strong>Classification Restricted would apply to</strong> (none): threat-information enabling adversary action.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (Per Classification Tier)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (Per Classification Tier)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6378,7 +6378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier">🗳️ Elect
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Election Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>P0</strong></td><td>KU32/KU33 second reading is post-election — the Sep 13 result determines whether grundlag changes ratify. Coalition arithmetic is the binding variable.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy + JuU15 + migration trio are central campaign-frame documents. Government economic-stewardship narrative depends on Q3 macro execution.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Energy + housing + digital sector reforms are 2026/27 implementation windows; minimal Sep salience but legacy assets.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Procedural / oversight items provide background drumbeat for accountability narratives but rarely top-of-fold.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-7">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-7">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Master Scoring uses these classifications as input</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1–R8 cite the P0/P1 documents for risk-cluster construction</li>
@@ -6387,7 +6387,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-7">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6415,7 +6415,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CRX-ID</strong></td><td>CRX-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>Thematic clustering + cross-cluster interference + prior-run continuity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--six-thematic-clusters">🎯 Six Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--six-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-six-thematic-clusters">🎯 Six Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-six-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6465,7 +6465,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--six-thematic-clusters">🎯 Six Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Cluster</th><th>Lead Documents</th><th align="center">Total Significance Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>C1</strong></td><td>💰 <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong></td><td>HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236; HD024098 (counter-budget motion)</td><td align="center">28.0 (lead)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C2</strong></td><td>📜 <strong>Constitutional First Reading</strong></td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32</td><td align="center">18.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C3</strong></td><td>⚖️ <strong>Criminal Justice / Tidö Centerpiece</strong></td><td>HD03246 (JuU15) + HD03237</td><td align="center">15.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C4</strong></td><td>🌍 <strong>Ukraine Accountability + NATO Operationalisation</strong></td><td>HD03231 + HD03232 + HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">23.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C5</strong></td><td>🛂 <strong>Migration / Rights Tightening</strong></td><td>HD01SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229</td><td align="center">23.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C6</strong></td><td>🏠 <strong>Housing AML + Energy + Sector Reforms</strong></td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 + HD01CU22 + HD01CU42 + HD03240 + HD03239 + HD03242 + HD03244 + HD03233 + HD03245</td><td align="center">53.85 (high count, lower per-document)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map">🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid Mind-Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map">🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid Mind-Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Week 16&#x3C;br/>2026))
     Fiscal C1
@@ -6511,7 +6511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map">🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid
       HD03245 women's violence strategy
         HD10438 kvinnojourer interp</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is">🔁 Cross-Cluster Linkages (where the action is)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is">🔁 Cross-Cluster Linkages (where the action is)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6559,7 +6559,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is">🔁 Cross-Cluster Linka
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Linkage</th><th>Connecting Documents</th><th>Mechanism</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>C1 ↔ C6 (Climate-coherence tension)</strong></td><td>HD03236 fuel-tax cut <strong>vs</strong> HD03240 Electricity System Act + HD03239 wind power</td><td>Government climate brand under pressure: relief mechanism contradicts green ambition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C2 ↔ C4 (Press-freedom-abroad-vs-home)</strong></td><td>HD01KU33 narrowing <strong>vs</strong> HD03231 Nuremberg-style accountability</td><td>Cross-cluster rhetorical contradiction; opposition-frame target</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C3 ↔ C5 (Brott-och-ordning + migration alignment)</strong></td><td>HD03246 JuU15 + HD01SfU22 / Prop 235 / Prop 229</td><td>Tidö-deal coherence; SD-base reinforcement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C4 ↔ Threat T1</strong></td><td>HD03231 + HD01UFöU3 → Russian retaliation</td><td>Tribunal + NATO eFP elevate Sweden's adversary visibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C5 ↔ Threat T3</strong></td><td>Migration trio → V/C/MP ECHR challenge</td><td>Litigation predicate prepared in counter-motion text</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C6 ↔ Lantmäteriet capacity</strong></td><td>HD01CU28 register Jan 2027</td><td>IT-delivery dependency on Lantmäteriet capacity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C6 ↔ HD10438 (Kvinnojourer)</strong></td><td>HD03245 strategy + HD10438 interpellation</td><td>Strategy + funding-stress accountability moment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--prior-run-continuity">🔄 Prior-Run Continuity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--prior-run-continuity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-run-continuity">🔄 Prior-Run Continuity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-run-continuity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6597,7 +6597,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--prior-run-continuity">🔄 Prior-Run Continuity<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Connecting File</th><th>Continuity Type</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md</code></a></td><td><strong>Direct precedent</strong></td><td>Per-document deep dives on KU32, KU33, HD03231, HD03232, CU27, CU28</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>realtime-1434/comparative-international.md</code></a></td><td><strong>Direct precedent</strong></td><td>Nordic + EU benchmarks for KU33 / KU32 / Ukraine cluster</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td><td><strong>Direct precedent</strong></td><td>Scenario branches inherited and extended for fiscal+migration trios</td></tr><tr><td>Daily analysis 2026-04-15 → 2026-04-17</td><td><strong>Catalogue continuity</strong></td><td>JuU15 chamber-vote details (145–142) sourced from voteringar 2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>Quarterly NATO eFP risk assessment 2026-Q1</td><td><strong>Risk continuity</strong></td><td>T1 baseline established; this run upgrades to operational integration phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off">🔭 Forward Continuity (next-run hand-off)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off">🔭 Forward Continuity (next-run hand-off)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off"></a></h3>
 <p>The next analytical runs (daily 2026-04-19 → daily 2026-04-25) should prioritise:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03236 chamber vote (2026-04-22)</strong> — fiscal trilogy validation; risk R4 update</li>
@@ -6609,7 +6609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off">🔭 Forward Continuity (next-
 </ol>
 <p>Each of those events triggers a <strong>per-event analysis</strong> in the appropriate <code>analysis/daily/YYYY-MM-DD/{type}/</code> folder per Rule 1 isolation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6652,7 +6652,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">Election Salience</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>C1 Fiscal</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Cost-of-living = #1 voter issue; Q3 2026 macro = Sep verdict</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C2 Constitutional</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>KU33 second reading post-election ⇒ campaign vector</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C3 Criminal Justice</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Brott + ordning = #2 voter issue; Tidö centerpiece</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C4 Foreign Policy</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Cross-party consensus dampens electoral exploit</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C5 Migration</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>SD-base reinforcement; ECHR risk if struck pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C6 Sector Reforms</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Implementation-window 2026/27; minimal Sep salience</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-8">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-8">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-8"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Top-5 Developments uses C1–C6 directly</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Master Scoring distributes documents across C1–C6</li>
@@ -6663,7 +6663,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-8">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: Thematic clustering + cross-cluster interference + prior-run continuity (see <code>political-swot-framework.md</code> §Cross-Cluster Interference)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6695,7 +6695,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>MET-ID</strong></td><td>MET-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology Audited</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Self-Audit Type</strong></td><td>Per Rule 7 (Reference-Grade Self-Audit)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7, every reference-grade analysis package must include an explicit <strong>methodology self-audit</strong> documenting:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Which methodologies were applied to which analytical artefacts</li>
@@ -6706,7 +6706,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ol>
 <p>This file makes the analysis <strong>legible to readers, auditors, and methodology owners</strong> and creates a feedback loop into the canonical methodology guides.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6834,8 +6834,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology</th><th>Doctrine Source</th><th>Applied to Files</th><th align="center">Application Quality</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DIW v1.0 (Democratic-Impact Weighting)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code>; <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §Lead-Story Decision</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (with sensitivity analysis under 5 weight variants)</td></tr><tr><td>5-dimension significance composite</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Five-Dimension Raw Scoring</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>CIA-triad classification</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code> §CIA-Triad Impact</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (per-document)</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage-Completeness gate (≥ 7.0 weighted)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Coverage-Completeness Verification</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>TOWS interference matrix</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code> §TOWS Cross-Quadrant; <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §TOWS</td><td align="center">🟩 H (8 cross-quadrant pairs documented)</td></tr><tr><td>6-lens stakeholder perspective</td><td><code>political-style-guide.md</code></td><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td align="center">🟩 H (6 distinct lenses, election-2026 grid)</td></tr><tr><td>5×5 risk matrix + Bayesian + ALARP + cascading</td><td><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (8 risks, Bayesian rules, ALARP ladder, cascading map)</td></tr><tr><td>STRIDE</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1 §T3</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (full per-letter decomposition)</td></tr><tr><td>Attack Tree</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1 §T2 §T3</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (Mermaid trees)</td></tr><tr><td>Cyber Kill Chain</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1 (election-disinformation variant)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Diamond Model</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Scenario Analysis</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §ACH</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian priors with named triggers</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code></td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code> §Bayesian Update Rules; <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §90-Day Indicators</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative benchmarking</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> (6 jurisdictions)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster thematic mapping</td><td>Internal practice</td><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code> (6 clusters + linkages)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Election-2026 lens</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5/6</td><td>All Tier-A/B files</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (mandatory section, met)</td></tr><tr><td>Provenance discipline</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2</td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (timestamps + MCP attribution + selection status)</td></tr><tr><td>5-level confidence scale</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 4</td><td>All files (visible in tables)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Color-coded Mermaid diagrams</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 4</td><td>All 13 analytical files</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-uncertainty-hot-spots">🌫️ Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-high-confidence-findings--vh">High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-confidence-findings--vh"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-uncertainty-hot-spots">🌫️ Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-high-confidence-findings--vh">High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-confidence-findings--vh"></a></h4>
 <p>These conclusions are well-grounded in evidence and stable under sensitivity analysis:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lead-story selection</strong> — Spring Fiscal Trilogy as lead is stable under 3 / 5 sensitivity variants</li>
@@ -6844,7 +6844,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-high-confidence-findings--vh">High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)<a cl
 <li><strong>NATO eFP first operational deployment</strong> — official deployment timeline published</li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine tribunal architecture</strong> — published treaty text; founding-member status definitive</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-medium-confidence-findings--m">Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-confidence-findings--m"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-medium-confidence-findings--m">Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-confidence-findings--m"></a></h4>
 <p>These rely on interpretation of existing patterns and require update on triggering events:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coalition fracture probability under SD pressure</strong> — depends on SD strategic patience and L brand-management</li>
@@ -6853,7 +6853,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-medium-confidence-findings--m">Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)<a
 <li><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</strong> — rising baseline but exact timing uncertain</li>
 <li><strong>Q3 2026 macro improvement probability</strong> — fiscal-stimulus lag-time + external-shock risk</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-low-confidence-findings--l">Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-low-confidence-findings--l"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-low-confidence-findings--l">Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-low-confidence-findings--l"></a></h4>
 <p>These have substantive open questions and benefit from active monitoring:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>US administration cooperation with HD03231 tribunal</strong> — public statements ambiguous</li>
@@ -6862,25 +6862,25 @@ <h3 id="rm-low-confidence-findings--l">Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)<a class=
 <li><strong>Lantmäteriet IT delivery on Jan 2027 deadline</strong> — capacity constraints not publicly disclosed</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-known-limitations"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-forward-projection-limits">1. Forward-Projection Limits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-forward-projection-limits"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-forward-projection-limits">1. Forward-Projection Limits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-forward-projection-limits"></a></h4>
 <p>Scenario analysis (§S1/S2/S3) projects 90-day base + post-Sep behaviour. Beyond Sep 2026, scenario branches collapse to election outcome. Probabilities are <strong>conditional on current conditions</strong> and require Bayesian updates as W1/W2 indicators fire.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections">2. Quantitative Vote-Margin Projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections">2. Quantitative Vote-Margin Projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections"></a></h4>
 <p>Cross-party vote matrix (<code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §Cross-Party Vote Matrix) projects probable positions <strong>for first reading</strong>. Second-reading projections (post-Sep) depend on coalition composition — <code>[MEDIUM]</code> confidence at best.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration">3. Russian-Hybrid Magnitude Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration">3. Russian-Hybrid Magnitude Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration"></a></h4>
 <p>T1 / R1 calibration relies on <strong>Nordic-Baltic baseline pattern</strong> (Finland 2023–24, Estonia 2024, Lithuania 2021–24). Sweden-specific event probability is interpreted from this baseline. <strong>No insider intel</strong> is incorporated; this is OSINT-only analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-echr-docket-speed">4. ECHR Docket Speed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-echr-docket-speed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-echr-docket-speed">4. ECHR Docket Speed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-echr-docket-speed"></a></h4>
 <p>T3 / R3 / W2 timing depends on Strasbourg case-admission speed. ECtHR backlog ~22,000 cases; timing genuinely uncertain.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage">5. Stakeholder Position Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage">5. Stakeholder Position Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage"></a></h4>
 <p>6 stakeholder lenses cover the major axes but <strong>omit specific industry sub-sectors</strong> (e.g. fishing, maritime, agricultural). For sector-specific impact analysis, additional consultation would be required.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity">6. Macro-Indicator Granularity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity">6. Macro-Indicator Granularity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity"></a></h4>
 <p>Economic-data.json provides annual-frequency World Bank data. Quarterly KI + SCB data would be needed for tighter Q3 2026 trajectory analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-source-protected-channels">7. Source-Protected Channels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-source-protected-channels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-source-protected-channels">7. Source-Protected Channels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-source-protected-channels"></a></h4>
 <p>This analysis uses only public-domain sources (Riksdagen, Regeringskansliet, World Bank, RSF, FH). No source-protected intel is incorporated. Real-world intelligence operations would augment with classified channels.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail">8. Fiscal-Arithmetic Detail<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail">8. Fiscal-Arithmetic Detail<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail"></a></h4>
 <p><code>HD03100</code> total fiscal package size cited as "SEK 60 B+ net stimulus" — figure approximate from press summaries. Exact number requires FiU committee report parsing.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-would-strengthen-future-runs">🆕 What Would Strengthen Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-would-strengthen-future-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-would-strengthen-future-runs">🆕 What Would Strengthen Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-would-strengthen-future-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6954,7 +6954,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-would-strengthen-future-runs">🆕 What Would Strengthen Future
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Enhancement</th><th align="center">Estimated Value</th><th>Implementation Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>Quarterly KI / SCB macro-data integration</strong> for fiscal scenarios</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Real-time FiU committee report parsing</strong> for fiscal arithmetic precision</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>MCP server enhancement</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>SÄPO open-source bulletin RSS integration</strong> for R1 monitoring</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Strasbourg ECtHR docket scraper</strong> for R3 / W2 monitoring</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Cross-Nordic comparative dataset library</strong> (DK Folketing, NO Storting, FI Eduskunta)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Methodology + MCP</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Polls aggregator integration</strong> (Demoskop, Sifo, Inizio) for scenario tracking</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO joint-statement archive</strong> for R2 trigger detection</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>News journalist + curator</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>Lantmäteriet capacity dashboard</strong> (capacity assessment + IT-procurement portal) for R7</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>Industry-sector consultation database</strong> for stakeholder-perspective expansion</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Curator + business-development</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>Federated bayesian-prior memory</strong> across daily / weekly / monthly runs</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Methodology + AI infrastructure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommendations-for-codification">📚 Recommendations for Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommendations-for-codification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendations-for-codification">📚 Recommendations for Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-codification"></a></h3>
 <p>The following observations are <strong>candidates for promotion into the canonical methodology guides</strong> during the next quarterly methodology sweep (2026-07-18):</p>
 
 
@@ -7008,7 +7008,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommendations-for-codification">📚 Recommendations for Codificat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Observation</th><th>Promote To</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sensitivity-analysis under ≥ 5 weight variants</strong> as standard for lead-story decisions</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.2 §Rule 5</td><td>Prevents lead-story-bias under single-doctrine fragility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>6-lens stakeholder matrix</strong> as default for weekly/monthly</td><td><code>political-style-guide.md</code></td><td>Civil-society + media lenses are routinely under-weighted in 4-perspective approaches</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-cluster TOWS interference matrix</strong> as standard for SWOT</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.1</td><td>Identifies strategic centres of gravity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Bayesian update rules with named triggers</strong> as standard for risk register</td><td><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x</td><td>Prevents stale risk inventories</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Comparative benchmarking ≥ 6 jurisdictions</strong> as default</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 8</td><td>Currently ≥ 5 minimum; 6 provides better Nordic + EU + Anglosphere coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ACH on scenario branches</strong> as standard</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Scenario Analysis</td><td>Surfaces inconsistent indicator combinations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Election-2026 lens grid</strong> as MANDATORY for all Tier-A/B files in 2026</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 6</td><td>Ensures every analysis is election-aware</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology-reflection self-audit</strong> as MANDATORY for all reference-grade packages</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 7</td><td>Already in v5.1 — confirm performance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off">🔁 Quarterly Methodology Sweep Hand-Off<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off">🔁 Quarterly Methodology Sweep Hand-Off<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off"></a></h3>
 <p>The following items should be raised at the next quarterly methodology sweep:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>DIW multiplier calibration</strong> — current grundlag-narrowing ×1.40 vs grundlag-expanding ×1.25 spread should be tested against historical decisions over 2024–2026 for predictive accuracy</li>
@@ -7018,7 +7018,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off">🔁 Quarterly Methodology Swe
 <li><strong>Bayesian integration across runs</strong> — current updates are within-package; cross-run prior-passing not yet automated</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7050,7 +7050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication for Methodology</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Methodology stress-test: every weekly run between now and Sep 2026 will be reviewed against actual election outcome — high-stakes calibration moment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>Three scenario probabilities (S1=0.50; S2=0.35; S3=0.15) are themselves the <strong>target</strong> of Bayesian update across the next 5 monthly + 22 weekly runs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>If voter-salience rankings (cost-of-living > brott > försvar > klimat > migration > grundlag) are validated post-election, this methodology becomes a permanent prior</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Methodology will be <strong>directly judged</strong> by whether predicted vulnerabilities (Nordic-GDP gap, climate self-contradiction, cross-cluster tensions) translated to vote movement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>Methodology codification by 2026-Q4 → standard for 2027–2030 cycles</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-9">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-9">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-9"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md"><code>README.md</code></a> §Quality Gate Checklist — verifies methodology-application completeness</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Sensitivity Analysis — methodology stress-test</li>
@@ -7061,7 +7061,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-9">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) + Quarterly Methodology Sweep 2026-07-18 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7 (Reference-Grade Self-Audit)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7101,7 +7101,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>DLM-ID</strong></td><td>DLM-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17 (Riksmöte 2025/26)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>weekly-review-2026-04-18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total Documents Tracked</strong></td><td>23 high-significance documents (top of ≈150 in weekly catalog)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Persisted</strong></td><td>11 dok JSON files + <code>economic-data.json</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>riksdag-regering</code> (32+ tools) · <code>world-bank</code> · <code>scb</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2 (AI performs analysis; scripts only download data)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--persisted-files-in-documents">📄 Persisted Files (in <code>documents/</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--persisted-files-in-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-persisted-files-in-documents">📄 Persisted Files (in <code>documents/</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-persisted-files-in-documents"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7252,7 +7252,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--persisted-files-in-documents">📄 Persisted Files (in <code>documen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Date</th><th>MCP Source</th><th align="right">Retrieval Timestamp</th><th align="center">Selected? (post-DIW)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>hd01cu22.json</code></td><td>HD01CU22</td><td>Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference (L1)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01cu27.json</code></td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Section H3 (L2)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01cu28.json</code></td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Section H3 (L2)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01cu42.json</code></td><td>HD01CU42</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser vid hantering av dödsbon</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference (L1)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01ku32.json</code></td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:22Z</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>CO-PROMINENT (L3)</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01ku33.json</code></td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:22Z</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>CO-LEAD (L3)</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>hd024098.json</code></td><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion mot Extra ändringsbudget 2025/26:236</td><td>Mot</td><td>FiU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (typ=mot, rm=2025/26)</td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:23Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Counter-narrative reference (L2)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd10437.json</code></td><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet (interpellation)</td><td>Interp</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (typ=ip)</td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd10438.json</code></td><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Cross-link to HD03245</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd11718.json</code></td><td>HD11718</td><td>Statlig närvaro i sydöstra Skåne</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd11719.json</code></td><td>HD11719</td><td>Skattekrav mot kvinnor i tvångsprostitution</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td><code>economic-data.json</code></td><td>(n/a)</td><td>World Bank GDP / unemployment time series — Sweden + Nordic peers</td><td>Reference</td><td>—</td><td>n/a</td><td><code>world-bank</code> MCP</td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:25Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Backdrop for fiscal analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog">📚 Documents Referenced But NOT Persisted (in upstream catalog)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog">📚 Documents Referenced But NOT Persisted (in upstream catalog)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog"></a></h3>
 <p>These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream catalogs (week 16 batch download) or in the realtime-1434 deep-dive folder. They are cited by dok_id throughout the analysis package:</p>
 
 
@@ -7351,7 +7351,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog">📚 Doc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Source Where Persisted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårpropositionen 2026</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudgeten 2026</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel + el/gas</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine Special Tribunal</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Damages Commission</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperability data sharing</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Active forestry framework</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-16 (JuU15 protokoll separately)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategy on men's violence vs women</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity System Act</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power municipal share</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Anti-fraud electronic communications</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3</td><td>NATO eFP Finland</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition orders (migration)</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235</td><td>Deportation expansion</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229</td><td>New reception law</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--provenance-summary">🔑 Provenance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--provenance-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-summary">🔑 Provenance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7404,7 +7404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--provenance-summary">🔑 Provenance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Source-protected information</strong>: NONE in this run. All claims sourced from public Riksdagen / Regeringskansliet / World Bank data per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md"><code>Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION</code></a>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coverage-verification">✅ Coverage Verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coverage-verification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-verification">✅ Coverage Verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-verification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7444,7 +7444,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coverage-verification">✅ Coverage Verification<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Check</th><th align="center">Result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>All 11 persisted JSONs match a dok_id referenced in synthesis-summary.md</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>All documents with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 cited in synthesis-summary.md and significance-scoring.md</td><td align="center">✅ (14/14)</td></tr><tr><td>economic-data.json values cited in synthesis-summary.md and swot-analysis.md (W2, W3)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098 (counter-budget motion) referenced in cross-reference-map.md C1</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438 cross-linked to HD03245 in stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD11718 + HD11719 referenced in stakeholder-perspectives.md (Civil Society lens)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Realtime-1434 cross-references resolve to existing files</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--update-cycle">🔁 Update Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--update-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-update-cycle">🔁 Update Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-update-cycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7472,7 +7472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--update-cycle">🔁 Update Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger</th><th>Refresh Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>New persisted dok JSON</td><td>Re-run <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> row insert + verify selection status</td></tr><tr><td>Significance-scoring re-rank</td><td>Update "Selected? (post-DIW)" column</td></tr><tr><td>Article published</td><td>Verify each H3 section maps to a persisted or referenced dok_id</td></tr><tr><td>MCP source schema change</td><td>Re-validate retrieval timestamps + caching annotations</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-10">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-10">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-10"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md"><code>README.md</code></a> §File Index lists every persisted + analytical artefact</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Coverage-Completeness Verification mirrors the verification table here</li>
@@ -7480,6 +7480,23 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-10">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2 (separation: data download vs analysis) + §Provenance discipline</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -7527,7 +7544,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:02.332Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:23.885Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html b/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html
index 11ee50ae6f..1ac1194e21 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Riksdag Week 16, 2026">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:02.740Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:24.239Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:02.740Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:24.239Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-18T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Week 16, 2026","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:02.740Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Week 16, 2026","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-18T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:24.239Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-18-weekly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -235,12 +235,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 4 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision based on Week 16 (2026-04-11 → 2026-04-17)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs · 30 days · post-Sep 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Author</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent, James Pether Sörling editorial responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 Rules 0–8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Sweden's Riksdag delivered the most consequential legislative week of the 2025/26 spring term.</strong> PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled a Spring Fiscal Trilogy (Vårproposition <code>HD03100</code> + Vårändringsbudget <code>HD0399</code> + Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code> — fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) into a backdrop of 0.82 % 2024 GDP growth (vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 %; World Bank) and 8.7 % 2025 unemployment, the highest since the pandemic. <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet</strong> simultaneously advanced two <strong>grundlag amendments</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> digital-evidence search/seizure) — the first substantive narrowing of <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) in years; because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the <strong>September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency</strong>. <strong>Foreign Minister (Utrikesminister) Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and Kristersson tabled Sweden's accession to the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> (<code>HD03231</code>) and the <strong>International Compensation Commission</strong> (<code>HD03232</code>) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg, with Sweden as founding member. The chamber confirmed the Tidöavtalet's working majority on <strong>JuU15</strong> (juvenile-offender tightening, <strong>145–142</strong>) — pure bloc vote, three-vote margin, the thinnest functional majority of the spring term. <strong>HD01UFöU3</strong> authorised 1,200 Swedish troops to Finland under NATO eFP — the first major operational expression of NATO membership. The cluster reveals a <strong>coordinated pre-election legislative sprint</strong> across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, fiscal stimulus, criminal-justice tightening, housing-market integrity, and energy reform. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong> for Week-16 print + digital</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Five-Dimension Scoring — Spring Fiscal Trilogy weighted <strong>10.0</strong> ⇒ lead; KU33 weighted <strong>9.80</strong> ⇒ co-prominent</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO + foreign-policy commentariat engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 + R6 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> S4 × T1 TOWS</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-posture + ECHR-litigation threat monitoring</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T1 + T3 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R1 + R3</td><td align="right">Continuous; heightened post-2026-04-22</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The lead story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236). Fuel-tax cut (82 öre / litre); el/gas relief; Vårproposition reaffirms försvarsanslag glide-path. SEK 60 B+ net stimulus. The <strong>economic-stewardship axis</strong> of the 2026 campaign turns on Q3 2026 macro data. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>The democratic-infrastructure story is KU33</strong> (HD01KU33). Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong>. Two-reading rule embeds the second reading in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met</strong>: all 14 documents with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 receive dedicated H3 sections in the published article (per <code>significance-scoring.md</code> coverage gate). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader, Ukraine + budget co-signatory</td><td>Political owner of fiscal trilogy + foreign-policy package</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, Finance Minister)</td><td>Architect of Vårproposition + Extra ändringsbudget</td><td>Fiscal credibility custodian; Q3 2026 macro = legacy variable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, Foreign Minister / Utrikesminister)</td><td>Tribunal architect</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; norm-entrepreneurship capital since NATO accession</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, Justice Minister)</td><td>KU33 + JuU15 owner</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretation; juvenile-offender execution responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson</strong> (M, Defence Minister)</td><td>NATO eFP owner</td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deployment 2026-Q3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, party leader)</td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Position on KU33 will decide second-reading coalition; counter-budget construction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong> (S, finance spokesman)</td><td>S budget critique architect</td><td>Counter-budget arithmetic + cost-of-living narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader, Labour Minister)</td><td>Coalition partner most press-freedom &#x26; migration sensitive</td><td>Watch for liberal-identity friction on KU33 + migration trio</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong> (KD, party leader, Energy Minister)</td><td>KD law-and-order alignment</td><td>Underwrites JuU15 + KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong> (SD, party leader)</td><td>Parliamentary support kingmaker</td><td>145–142 leverage; migration trio political owner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, party leader)</td><td>V leader</td><td>Campaign voice against KU33 + migration trio + budget</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>MP leader</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong> (C, party leader)</td><td>Centre-bloc swing</td><td>Migration counter-motion architect; budget alternative custodian</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Collective)</td><td>Constitutional review body</td><td>Pending KU33/KU32 yttrande = single most consequential upcoming signal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong> (Ukraine President)</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 2025 co-signatory</td><td>Tribunal political guarantor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Försvarsmakten ÖB Micael Bydén</strong></td><td>Operational owner for eFP deployment</td><td>Bn-task-group readiness Q3 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers">🔮 Next 30 Days — What to Watch (with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers">🔮 Next 30 Days — What to Watch (with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-30-days--what-to-watch-with-triggers">🔮 Next 30 Days — Wha
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong> (scheduled)</td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on Extra ändringsbudget (HD03236)</td><td>Confirms (or stresses) fiscal-package coherence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-27</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>First political-accountability drumbeat of post-Easter cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026 (April–June)</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict language ⇒ R2 ↓ 4; silent ⇒ R2 ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>May–June 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote (vilande beslut)</strong> on KU33/KU32 first reading</td><td>First-reading confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>Late May / June 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote on HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Tribunal + reparations accession</td></tr><tr><td>2026-Q3</td><td>Försvarsmakten deploys Bn-task-group to Finland</td><td>First operational NATO posture milestone</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td><strong>V + C + MP file ECHR challenge on inhibition orders</strong></td><td>Migration-trio durability test</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous (heightened)</td><td><strong>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins</strong></td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators (R1 monitoring)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Swedish general election</td><td>Post-election composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects (<code>scenario-analysis.md</code> priors)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-3-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-3 Risks (from <cod
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare retaliation</strong> post-tribunal + NATO eFP</td><td align="center">18 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td><td>SÄPO/MSB heightened posture; Nordic-Baltic intel-sharing; civil-society resilience</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> (interpretive frontier)</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO remissvar; statutory clarity in 2nd reading</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Migration trio ECHR strike-down</strong></td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Government legal review; appeal-mechanism build-out; UNHCR consultation discipline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-3-opportunities">🎯 Top-3 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-3-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-opportunities">🎯 Top-3 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-3-opportunities">🎯 Top-3 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneurship dividend</strong> from Ukraine tribunal — Sweden positions as Nordic accountability leader</td><td>HD03231 + Council of Europe framework</td><td align="center">Decadal</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Cross-party constitutional statesmanship</strong> on KU33 if S leadership endorses Norway-style statutory triggers (<code>comparative-international.md</code> §Nordic models)</td><td>HD01KU33 + Lagrådet review</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>Coalition-stability narrative</strong> if JuU15 is followed by Q2/Q3 fiscal-package execution without further close votes</td><td>Voteringsregister + macro indicators</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -547,12 +547,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW + immediate-impact balance)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>Sensitivity analysis confirms top rank under 5 plausible weight variations</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>All 11 documents with weighted ≥ 7.0 covered as dedicated H3 sections</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>JuU15 = operationally validated; other patterns established</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party second-reading vote projection (KU33)</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on Sep 2026 election outcome — three plausible coalition compositions</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP + tribunal; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US administration tribunal cooperation</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; shift possible</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR ruling on migration trio</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Counter-motion text shows preparedness; Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md">Data Manifest</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -604,10 +604,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SYN-ID</strong></td><td>SYN-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>weekly-review-2026-04-18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17 (Riksmöte 2025/26)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent (Copilot Sonnet 4.x)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodologies Applied</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8) · DIW v1.0 · TOWS · Attack-Tree · Kill Chain · Bayesian · ACH · Scenario Analysis · Comparative Politics</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>get_propositioner</code> · <code>get_betankanden</code> · <code>get_motioner</code> · <code>search_dokument</code> · <code>search_voteringar</code> · <code>search_anforanden</code> · <code>search_regering</code> · <code>get_g0v_document_content</code> · World Bank GDP/unemployment series</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Tracked</strong></td><td>23 high-significance documents (top of ≈150 in weekly catalog)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Persisted in <code>documents/</code></strong></td><td>11 dok files + <code>economic-data.json</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong> for fiscal package + KU constitutional package + Ukraine; 🟩 HIGH for migration trio; 🟧 MEDIUM for prospective coalition trajectory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-04-25 (next review event-driven)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdag Week 16 (2026‑04‑11 → 2026‑04‑17) was the most legislatively consequential week of the 2025/26 spring term and one of the densest pre-election weeks in a decade. The Kristersson government tabled a <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> — Vårproposition (<code>HD03100</code>), Vårändringsbudget (<code>HD0399</code>) and Extra ändringsbudget (<code>HD03236</code>, fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) — into a backdrop of 0.82 % 2024 GDP growth (vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 %) and 8.7 % 2025 unemployment, the highest since the pandemic. Simultaneously, <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet</strong> advanced two grundlag amendments (<code>HD01KU32</code> media accessibility under TF + YGL, and <code>HD01KU33</code> removing "allmän handling" status from material seized at husrannsakan unless <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>) — the first substantive narrowing of <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) in years. <strong>FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and <strong>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> tabled Sweden's accession to the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> (<code>HD03231</code>, first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg) and the <strong>International Compensation Commission</strong> (<code>HD03232</code>). On Wednesday 2026‑04‑15, the chamber confirmed the coalition's working majority on <strong>JuU15</strong> (juvenile-offender tightening, 145–142) — pure bloc vote, three-vote margin, the thinnest functional majority of the spring term. Civilutskottet advanced the <strong>National Condominium Register</strong> (<code>HD01CU28</code>, ~2 M bostadsrätter, Lantmäteriet target Jan 2027) and the <strong>Lagfart / ombildning AML rules</strong> (<code>HD01CU27</code>). NATO operationalised: <strong>HD01UFöU3</strong> authorised 1,200 Swedish troops to Finland under eFP — Sweden's first major NATO operational deployment. Migration tightened on three vectors (<code>SfU22</code> inhibition orders + Prop 235 deportation expansion + Prop 229 reception law) prompting V + C + MP coordinated counter-motions structured for ECHR challenge. The week produced <strong>8 priority risks</strong> (Russian hybrid retaliation post-tribunal at top of register), surfaced <strong>two cross-cluster rhetorical tensions</strong> (press freedom abroad vs at home; green transition vs fuel-tax cut), and consolidated a <strong>coordinated pre-election legislative sprint</strong> across democratic infrastructure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, fiscal stimulus, criminal-justice tightening, housing-market integrity, and energy reform. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision (Publication Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-publication-gate"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Decision</strong>: Lead article with <strong>the Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (<code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> + <code>HD03236</code>). <strong>Re-weighting rationale</strong>: Raw significance (10) and DIW-weighted significance (10.0 — fiscal trilogies receive ×1.00 baseline because they are policy-cyclical not democratic-infrastructure) combine with <strong>immediate citizen-impact magnitude</strong> (drivmedel, el/gas, ranta-på-amortering, försvarsanslag) and <strong>electoral salience</strong> (Sweden's economic stewardship is the central 2026 campaign axis). Spring budget weeks are the one fiscal moment of the year when the entire policy mix is on the table in a single editorial frame.</p>
 <p>The <strong>Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> + <code>HD01KU33</code>) carry <strong>higher democratic-infrastructure durability</strong> and rank <strong>#2 / #3 by DIW</strong> — they receive a dedicated H3 section in the article with the cross-reference to realtime-1434 in-depth analysis. The Coverage-Completeness Rule (≥ 7.0 weighted) is <strong>enforced</strong>: every document below also receives mandatory H3 coverage.</p>
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-lead-story-decision-publication-gate">🏛️ Lead-Story Decision
 <p><strong>Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) doctrine</strong>: documented in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a> §Rule 5. Grundlag amendments narrowing public access receive ×1.40; expanding rights ×1.25; foreign-policy continuity ×0.95; ordinary policy-cyclical ×1.00; AML premium ×1.05.</p>
 <p><strong>Anti-pattern avoidance</strong>: This week's lead is fiscal not constitutional, but the synthesis explicitly flags KU33 as the highest <em>durable democratic-infrastructure</em> development — to prevent the realtime-1434 anti-pattern (silent omission of constitutional package). Sensitivity analysis in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Sensitivity confirms the ranking under five plausible weight variations.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-developments-weighted-rank">📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-developments-weighted-rank"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-developments-weighted-rank">📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted Rank)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-developments-weighted-rank"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph CL1["💰 Cluster 1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy — LEAD"]
         HD03100["HD03100&#x3C;br/>Vårproposition&#x3C;br/>📊 LEAD"]
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-developments-weighted-rank">📊 Top-5 Developments (Weighted
     style GANG fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style ECHR_RISK fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document">📚 Documents Analysed — Depth Level by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document">📚 Documents Analysed — Depth Level by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-analysed--depth-level-by-document">📚 Documents Analysed
 <p>Documents <strong>HD10437 (Lönetransparensdirektivet)</strong>, <strong>HD10438 (Nedläggning av kvinnojourer)</strong>, <strong>HD11718 (Statlig närvaro sydöstra Skåne)</strong>, <strong>HD11719 (Skattekrav mot kvinnor i tvångsprostitution)</strong> are interpellations / EU reports persisted in <code>documents/</code>. They appear as L1 quick-classified rows in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a>. HD10438 cross-references HD03245 (women's-violence strategy).</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-political-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Note on fuel-tax figures</strong>: This dossier consistently cites <strong>82 öre per litre</strong> as the <strong>statutory excise-duty (energiskatt) reduction</strong> in HD03236 (the Extra ändringsbudget tax-component cut). The PR description's "SEK 2.50 per litre" figure refers to the broader <strong>pump-price effect estimate</strong> including VAT pass-through and prior 2025 indexation reversals as projected by the Finansdepartementet pump-price model. The two figures measure different things; analyses across this package use the statutory tax-component figure (82 öre) for direct comparability with HD03236 fiscal arithmetic.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-political-intelligence-findings">🔑 Key Political Intelligence
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Finding</th><th>Evidence (dok_id / source)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Democratic Impact</th><th align="center">Election 2026 Salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td>The fiscal trilogy is the <strong>most consequential pre-election fiscal moment of the term</strong>. Fuel-tax cut (82 öre / litre) + el/gas relief target consumer cost-of-living; Vårproposition reaffirms försvarsanslag glide-path; SEK 60 B+ in net stimulus across the package.</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236; economic-data.json (GDP 0.82 %, unemployment 8.7 %); FiU committee record</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>The <strong>JuU15 chamber vote (145–142)</strong> is the <strong>thinnest functional government majority of the spring term</strong> — pure bloc vote, zero cross-aisle defections; SD voted with government on every paragraph; demonstrates the Tidö working majority holds <strong>but only just</strong>.</td><td>JuU15 protokoll; voteringsregister 2026-04-15</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH (coalition stability)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>KU33 is the <strong>first substantive narrowing of TF's offentlighetsprincip</strong> in the digital-evidence sphere — modifies a 1766 text that predates the U.S. Constitution. Two-reading rule (8 kap. RF) embeds the second reading in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag.</td><td>HD01KU33 betänkande; TF 1766 original text; KU committee record; 8 kap. 14 § RF</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F4</td><td>The <strong>Migration tightening triple</strong> (SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229) is met by <strong>coordinated V + C + MP counter-motions</strong> structured as an ECHR-litigation predicate. The opposition is preparing a Strasbourg case on inhibition-order proportionality.</td><td>SfU22 betänkande; V + C + MP motioner counter-text; ECHR Convention Art. 8 + 13; UNHCR consultation record</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) = founding-member status → Sweden's <strong>largest norm-entrepreneurship commitment since NATO accession</strong>; no direct fiscal burden (reparations funded from Russian immobilised assets EUR 260 B at Euroclear + G7 venues); Nuremberg framing pre-empts SD/domestic criticism.</td><td>HD03231 proposition; HD03232 proposition; G7 Ukraine Loan Jan 2025; FM Stenergard verbatim 2026-04-16</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH (foreign-policy)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (universal consensus)</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td><strong>HD01UFöU3 = first operational NATO output</strong>: 1,200 Swedish troops authorised to Finland under eFP. Marks the <strong>shift from accession (March 2024) to operational integration</strong>. Försvarsmakten will deploy Bn-task-group elements 2026-Q3.</td><td>HD01UFöU3 betänkande; UFöU committee record; Försvarsmakten deployment timeline</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH (sovereignty doctrine)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>The <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy carries an internal coherence problem</strong>: the Extra ändringsbudget cuts fuel tax 82 öre / litre while Prop 240 (Electricity System Act) and Prop 239 (wind-power municipal revenue sharing) signal serious climate ambition. The fiscal package undermines the green-transition rhetorical brand at exactly the moment the electricity-system reform peaks.</td><td>HD03236 fiscal arithmetic; HD03240 + HD03239 propositions; Klimatpolitiska rådet 2025 report</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td><strong>Cross-cluster rhetorical tension</strong>: government championing Nuremberg-style accountability abroad (HD03231) while narrowing TF at home (HD01KU33) — opposition will frame as "Sweden defends press freedom elsewhere while compressing it at home." Latent T2 threat (<code>threat-analysis.md</code>).</td><td>HD03231 + HD01KU33 juxtaposition; political-swot-framework §TOWS Interference; campaign-rhetoric analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>F9</td><td><strong>Civilutskottet AML cluster</strong> (HD01CU27 ghost-tenant rule + HD01CU28 ~2 M-bostadsrätt register Jan 2027) extends government's organised-crime agenda into property markets. Lantmäteriet IT delivery is the binding constraint — procurement notice expected Q3 2026.</td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 betänkanden; gäng-agenda Prop 2025/26:100; Lantmäteriet capacity assessment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>F10</td><td>Average weekly significance score <strong>7.5 / 10</strong> — exceptional vs the parliamentary-week baseline (~3.8). Week 16 sits in the <strong>top 5 % of legislatively-loaded weeks since 2010</strong> and structurally <strong>front-loads the entire 2026 spring agenda before the summer recess (Jul 1)</strong>.</td><td>Weekly aggregator; historical Riksmöte tempo data 2010–2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Landscape (Aggregate from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Composite Political Risk — Apr 11-17, 2026"
     x-axis ["Apr 11", "Apr 12", "Apr 13", "Apr 14", "Apr 15", "Apr 16", "Apr 17"]
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape-aggregate-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Risk Land
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1 — Russian hybrid retaliation</strong> (post-tribunal + NATO eFP)</td><td align="center"><strong>18 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td></tr><tr><td>R2 — KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment (interpretive frontier)</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE (press freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>R3 — Migration trio ECHR strike-down</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td></tr><tr><td>R4 — Coalition fracture under SD pressure (post-145–142)</td><td align="center">11 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R5 — Fuel-tax cut undermines climate brand</td><td align="center">9 / 25</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R6 — Tribunal effectiveness without US</td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE MITIGATION</td></tr><tr><td>R7 — Lantmäteriet register IT delivery delay</td><td align="center">9 / 25</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td></tr><tr><td>R8 — Reparations fatigue (decadal)</td><td align="center">7 / 25</td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Full risk register, Bayesian update rules, ALARP ladder, 90-day calendar in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate">🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix (Week-Aggregate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate">🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix (Week-Aggregate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-party-vote-matrix-week-aggregate">🎭 Cross-Party Vote Matrix
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Fiscal Pkg (FiU)</th><th align="center">KU32/33 (constitutional)</th><th align="center">JuU15 (juvenile)</th><th align="center">Migration trio (SfU)</th><th align="center">Ukraine (UU)</th><th align="center">Energy (NU)</th><th align="center">NATO eFP (UFöU)</th><th align="center">Housing (CU)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>M (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (proposing)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L (Gov)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns (KU33)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Support)</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For (AML angle)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (145)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For (Nuremberg framing aligns)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Against (counter-budget)</td><td align="center">🟡 Divided (KU33)</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (142)</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 Against</td><td align="center">🔴 Against KU33 likely 2nd reading</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (142)</td><td align="center">🔴 Strongly against (counter-motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 For (accountability)</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🟡 Divided</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 Against</td><td align="center">🔴 Against KU33</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (142)</td><td align="center">🔴 Strongly against (counter-motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 Against (own budget)</td><td align="center">🟡 For with concerns</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td><td align="center">🔴 Against (counter-motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 Strongly for</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td><td align="center">🟢 For</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Synthesis</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: The week confirmed the four-bloc structure: (M+KD+L+SD), (S center-left), (V+MP rights-bloc), (C swing). The 145–142 JuU15 vote is the operational signature. Ukraine + KU32 + NATO consensus ≈ 349 MPs (near-universal). KU33 second reading after Sep 2026 election is <strong>structurally uncertain</strong> because the V+MP-strengthened left bloc would block.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators — Next 90 Days (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators — Next 90 Days (Watch Items with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators--next-90-days-watch-items-with-triggers">🔮 For
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner / Source</th><th align="center">Target Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on Extra ändringsbudget (HD03236)</td><td>FiU committee → kammarvote</td><td>Kammaren, FiU</td><td align="center"><strong>2026-04-22</strong> (scheduled)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>Committee schedule</td><td>KU</td><td align="center">2026-04-27</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</td><td>Published opinion</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on HD01KU32/KU33 first reading</td><td>KU referral → kammarvote (vilande beslut)</td><td>Kammaren, KU</td><td align="center"><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W5</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on HD03231/HD03232</td><td>UU committee → kammarvote</td><td>Kammaren, UU</td><td align="center"><strong>Late May / June 2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W6</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deploys to Finland</td><td>Operations order</td><td>Försvarsmakten</td><td align="center"><strong>2026-Q3</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>W7</strong></td><td>V/C/MP ECHR challenge filing on inhibition orders</td><td>Strasbourg docket</td><td>V parlamentariska kansli</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W8</strong></td><td>S leadership position on KU33 (hardens for/against)</td><td>Partiledarskap statements</td><td>Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W9</td><td>Russian hybrid-warfare escalation</td><td>SÄPO annual report; Nordic events</td><td>SÄPO, MUST</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened)</td></tr><tr><td>W10</td><td>RSF / Freedom House publication on KU33 effects</td><td>Annual index cycle</td><td>RSF, FH</td><td align="center">2027-Q2</td></tr><tr><td>W11</td><td>Lantmäteriet register IT procurement</td><td>Anbud notice</td><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>W12</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition → KU33 2nd-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten preliminary</td><td>Valmyndigheten</td><td align="center">Oct–Nov 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rule 5/6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rule 5/6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rule-56">🗳️ Elect
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Specific Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy + JuU15 = government's central campaign assets ("ekonomin tryggare, brotten färre"). KU33 = secondary risk (V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation 0.5–1.5 pp; reverse-2008-FRA effect). Migration trio = SD-base reinforcement but ECHR risk if struck before Sep.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>M+KD+L+SD continuity (P=0.50) preserves all four legislative streams; S-led minority (P=0.35) likely re-opens budget arithmetic + may revise KU33 language; S+V+MP majority (P=0.15) blocks KU33 2nd reading + opens Vårändringsbudget renegotiation. Detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living (fuel, el, hyror) > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat > migration > grundlag. KU33 only enters top-5 if a chilling-effect case breaks before Sep 2026 (Wildcard-1).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Government most exposed on: (a) Nordic GDP gap (Sweden 0.82 % vs Denmark 3.5 %); (b) cross-cluster tension (press freedom abroad/at home); (c) ECHR ruling on inhibition orders. Opposition most exposed on: alternative fiscal arithmetic; Ukraine consensus (cannot break); JuU15 vote-against framing as "soft on crime".</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy = annual cyclical policy (resets each year). KU33 = decadal grundlag change (only reversible by another grundlag change ⇒ 2 elections). HD03231 = institutional commitment binding for tribunal lifespan (10–25 yrs precedent). HD01UFöU3 = doctrinal precedent for further NATO-integration deployments.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW + immediate-impact balance)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Sensitivity analysis in <code>significance-scoring.md</code> confirms top rank under 5 plausible weight variations</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness (≥ 7.0 weighted)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>All 11 documents above the gate appear as dedicated H3 sections in the published article</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>JuU15 = operationally validated 145–142; other patterns established</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party <strong>second-reading</strong> vote projection (KU33)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Depends on 2026 election outcome — three plausible coalition compositions</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture risk (R4)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>145–142 = stable but minimal margin; SD leverage measurable</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude (R1)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP + tribunal; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal cooperation (R6)</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Public statements ambiguous</td></tr><tr><td>Migration ECHR-strike-down probability (R3)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Counter-motion text shows preparedness; Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1553,7 +1553,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-critique">🕵️ Red-Team / Devil's-Ad
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Challenge</th><th>Mainstream View</th><th>Devil's-Advocate View</th><th>Analytic Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Spring fiscal package as "election bribe"?</strong></td><td>Stimulus targets cost-of-living pressure citizens genuinely face</td><td>Fuel-tax cut benefits high-mileage / rural voters disproportionately and undermines green credibility</td><td>Both true. The intervention is regressive on climate but genuinely targeted on income groups with highest fuel-cost share. Nordic comparators (DK fuel surtax retained; NO carbon-fee adjusted) show alternative fiscal designs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>JuU15 145–142 = stability or fragility?</strong></td><td>3-vote margin = fragile coalition</td><td>145 vs 142 = pure bloc vote with zero defections = remarkable discipline</td><td>Operational stability <strong>for legislation that fits the four-party agenda</strong>; fragility re-emerges on issues that split SD from L (most plausibly: any further constitutional / international-law commitment)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU33 = press-freedom regression?</strong></td><td>1766 narrowing is a step backwards</td><td>Norway (RSF #1), Denmark (#3), Finland (#5) operate equivalent regimes</td><td>Both true: Nordic normalisation is real; interpretive-frontier risk is real. The deciding variable is "formellt tillförd bevisning" definition strictness (<code>comparative-international.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Migration trio = ECHR strike-down inevitable?</strong></td><td>V/C/MP have prepared a litigation predicate</td><td>ECHR Article 8 jurisprudence supports proportionate inhibition orders if appeal mechanisms exist</td><td>Probability of full strike-down ≈ 0.20; partial requirement to add appeal mechanism ≈ 0.45; clean pass ≈ 0.35 (<code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Migration scenarios)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine tribunal = symbolic only without US?</strong></td><td>Without US, China, major Global South, tribunal is symbolically historic but operationally marginal</td><td>Symbolic deterrence + norm-building have independent weight; ECCC / SCSL operated effectively without all great powers</td><td>Both analyses required. Operational caseload depends on (a) Russian-asset access; (b) successor-state behaviour</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition fracture under cost-of-living = high prob?</strong></td><td>Polls show economic stewardship as #1 issue ⇒ government most exposed</td><td>Government has tabled visible relief (fuel, el, gas) ⇒ exposure is mitigated</td><td>Stewardship vulnerability persists; mitigation is partial. Outcome conditional on Q2/Q3 2026 macro data</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster Strategic Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-cross-cluster-strategic-interference">🔁 TOWS Cross-Cluster S
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Combination</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine S × KU33 T</strong></td><td>Government championing Nuremberg-style accountability abroad while narrowing TF at home → rhetorical exposure</td><td>Opposition talking point: <em>"Sweden defends press freedom elsewhere while compressing it at home"</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal S × Migration T</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living relief sells well to median voter; migration tightening sells to SD base; tension is between coalition partner L (most uncomfortable on migration) and SD</td><td>L–SD friction is the strategic centre of gravity for coalition stability through Sep 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Energy O × Fiscal W</strong></td><td>Electricity System Act + wind-power municipal share = green ambition; fuel-tax cut = climate inversion</td><td>Government must hold both narratives simultaneously; opposition (MP especially) will exploit</td></tr><tr><td><strong>JuU15 razor-thin × SD leverage</strong></td><td>145–142 with SD as kingmaker on every paragraph = coalition cannot afford SD defection on any subsequent vote</td><td>Effective rightward agenda pull; L most exposed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>(Full TOWS matrix in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS.)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties">❓ Key Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-uncertainties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties">❓ Key Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1643,7 +1643,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties">❓ Key Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Uncertainty</th><th>Decision Impact</th><th align="center">Resolution Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>U1</td><td>Will Lagrådet scope "formellt tillförd bevisning" strictly?</td><td>Primary driver of KU33 interpretive trajectory</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U2</td><td>Will V/C/MP win partial or full ECHR ruling on inhibition orders?</td><td>Reverses or narrows SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229</td><td align="center">H2 2026 / 2027</td></tr><tr><td>U3</td><td>Will the spring fiscal package translate into measurable Q3 2026 economic indicators?</td><td>Decisive for Sep 2026 government economic-stewardship narrative</td><td align="center">2026-07-01 (KI prognos)</td></tr><tr><td>U4</td><td>Will post-Sep-2026 Riksdag composition support KU33 ratification?</td><td>Go / no-go for grundlag change</td><td align="center">2026-09-13</td></tr><tr><td>U5</td><td>Will US administration cooperate with HD03231 tribunal?</td><td>Tribunal effectiveness</td><td align="center">H2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>U6</td><td>Will Russian hybrid-warfare response escalate above threshold?</td><td>Security posture + campaign dynamics</td><td align="center">Continuous (heightened pre-election)</td></tr><tr><td>U7</td><td>Will the JuU15 145–142 majority hold for the next contentious vote?</td><td>Coalition stability indicator</td><td align="center">2026-Q2 / Q3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-artifacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-artifacts"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Reference-grade dossier files</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md">Comparative International</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></li>
@@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-artifacts">📎 Related Artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1700,7 +1700,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SIG-ID</strong></td><td>SIG-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>DIW v1.0 (Democratic-Impact Weighting) per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scoring Scale</strong></td><td>Raw 0–10 (5-dimension composite) → DIW multiplier → Weighted 0–10 (capped at 10.0 for documents whose weighted score would otherwise exceed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Scored</strong></td><td>23 high-significance + 8 supplementary (rapid quick-classify)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Persisted</strong></td><td>11 dok files in <code>documents/</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite">🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Scoring (0–10 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite">🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Scoring (0–10 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite"></a></h3>
 <p>The composite raw score is the rounded mean of five dimensions per <code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0:</p>
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--five-dimension-raw-scoring-010-composite">🎯 Five-Dimension Raw Sc
 <p><strong>Why raw scoring exists</strong>: The raw score is the news-value rank. The DIW multiplier converts it into the <strong>democratic-infrastructure-aware editorial rank</strong> (per Rule 5). Both are reported below.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51">🧮 DIW Multiplier Doctrine (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51">🧮 DIW Multiplier Doctrine (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-multiplier-doctrine-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v51">🧮 DIW
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document Class</th><th align="center">DIW Multiplier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Grundlag amendment narrowing public access</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>×1.40</strong></td><td>Reversal window measured in decades (two-election rule) ⇒ highest weight</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag amendment expanding rights</td><td align="center">×1.25</td><td>Decadal durability + rights-positive framing</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional / electoral / institutional reform (ordinary law)</td><td align="center">×1.15</td><td>Rule-of-law durability above policy cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Anti-money-laundering / financial-integrity premium</td><td align="center">×1.05</td><td>Cross-cutting institutional value</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary policy-cyclical (budget, tax, spending)</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td>Annual reset cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign-policy continuity (treaty accession in established framework)</td><td align="center">×0.95</td><td>Substantively important but in established direction</td></tr><tr><td>Routine procedural / administrative</td><td align="center">×0.85</td><td>High volume, low marginal-impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score">📈 Master Scoring Table — All Documents Ranked by Weighted Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score">📈 Master Scoring Table — All Documents Ranked by Weighted Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scoring-table--all-documents-ranked-by-weighted-score">📈 M
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Type / Committee</th><th>Date</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW ×</th><th align="center"><strong>Weighted</strong></th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Article Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>HD03100</strong></td><td>Vårpropositionen 2026</td><td>Prop / FiU</td><td>04-13</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>10.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> (fiscal trilogy lead)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Insyn vid husrannsakan (constitutional)</td><td>Bet / KU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>1.40</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>📜 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> (constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>HD0399</strong></td><td>Vårändringsbudgeten 2026</td><td>Prop / FiU</td><td>04-13</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🏛️ Co-prominent (fiscal trilogy)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>HD03236</strong></td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel + el/gas</td><td>Prop / FiU</td><td>04-13</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🏛️ Co-prominent (fiscal trilogy)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>HD03246</strong></td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>Prop / JuU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>⚖️ Co-prominent (JuU15 vote 145–142)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav vissa medier (constitutional)</td><td>Bet / KU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>1.25</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.75</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>📜 Co-prominent (constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Ukraine Special Tribunal</td><td>Prop / UU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🌍 Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>Inhibition orders (migration)</td><td>Bet / SfU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>8.55</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🛂 Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>Ukraine Damages Commission</td><td>Prop / UU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🤝 Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>HD01UFöU3</strong></td><td>NATO eFP Finland 1,200 troops</td><td>Bet / UFöU</td><td>04-15</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>🛡️ Co-prominent</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td>Prop 235</td><td>Deportation expansion</td><td>Prop / SfU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🛂 Mandatory H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td>Prop 229</td><td>New reception law</td><td>Prop / SfU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center"><strong>7.60</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🛂 Mandatory H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">13</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity System Act</td><td>Prop / NU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>⚡ Mandatory H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategy on men's violence vs women</td><td>Skr / AU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>🆘 Mandatory H3 (HD10438 cross-link)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning</td><td>Prop / JuU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>6.30</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>⚖️ Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Lagfart + ombildning + AML</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>1.05</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>6.30</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🏠 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">17</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperability data sharing</td><td>Prop / TU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>💻 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">18</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Active forestry framework</td><td>Prop / MJU</td><td>04-16</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>🌲 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">19</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power municipal share</td><td>Prop / NU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>⚡ Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">20</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Bostadsrättsregister</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>🏠 Section H3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">21</td><td>HD03233</td><td>Anti-fraud electronic communications</td><td>Prop / TU</td><td>04-14</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>5.25</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>Section reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">22</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion mot Extra ändringsbudget (counter-budget)</td><td>Mot / FiU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center"><strong>5.25</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Counter-narrative reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">23</td><td>HD01CU22</td><td>Ställföreträdarskap att lita på</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">24</td><td>HD01CU42</td><td>Riksrevisionen om dödsbon</td><td>Bet / CU</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">25</td><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">26</td><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Cross-link to HD03245</td></tr><tr><td align="center">27</td><td>HD11718</td><td>Statlig närvaro sydöstra Skåne (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>3.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td align="center">28</td><td>HD11719</td><td>Skattekrav mot kvinnor i tvångsprostitution (interp)</td><td>Interp</td><td>04-17</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center"><strong>4.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Brief reference</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate">🏛️ Coverage-Completeness Verification (Rule 5 Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate">🏛️ Coverage-Completeness Verification (Rule 5 Gate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Rule</strong>: Every document with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 MUST appear as a dedicated H3 section in the published article.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-coverage-completeness-verification-rule-5-gate">🏛️ Coverage-
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Weighted</th><th align="center">Article H3?</th><th>Verification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td align="center">10.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>LEAD section "Spring Fiscal Package"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">9.80</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms"</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>LEAD section</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>LEAD section</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Criminal Justice / JuU15"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">8.75</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Constitutional Press-Freedom Reforms"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">8.55</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Ukraine Accountability"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">8.55</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Migration Tightening"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Ukraine Accountability"</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"NATO Operationalisation"</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Migration Tightening"</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229</td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Migration Tightening"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Energy &#x26; Green Transition"</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"Women's Violence Strategy"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Result</strong>: ✅ <strong>PASS</strong> — 14 / 14 weighted-≥-7 documents covered as dedicated sections.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision-with-reasoning">🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with reasoning)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision-with-reasoning"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-with-reasoning">🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with reasoning)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-with-reasoning"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Q["❓ Lead-Story Decision Process&#x3C;br/>Week 16, 2026"]
     Q --> R1["1. Compute raw score&#x3C;br/>5-dim composite"]
@@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision-with-reasoning">🎯 Lead-Story Decision (with r
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Anti-pattern avoidance</strong>: The synthesis-summary explicitly flags KU33 as the highest <em>democratic-infrastructure durability</em> development of the week — preventing the realtime-1434 anti-pattern (silent omission of the constitutional package).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes">🧪 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Lead Hold Under Alternative Weight Schemes?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes">🧪 Sensitivity Analysis — Does the Lead Hold Under Alternative Weight Schemes?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-schemes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2325,7 +2325,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis--does-the-lead-hold-under-alternative-weight-sc
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">DIW grundlag-narrowing weight</th><th align="center">KU33 weighted</th><th>Top-1 Result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Baseline (DIW v1.0)</strong></td><td align="center">×1.40</td><td align="center">9.80</td><td><strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy (10.00)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Scenario A: very strong democratic-infrastructure preference</td><td align="center">×1.50</td><td align="center">10.50</td><td><strong>KU33 (10.50)</strong> ← lead would shift</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario B: moderate preference</td><td align="center">×1.30</td><td align="center">9.10</td><td>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario C: news-value purist</td><td align="center">×1.00</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario D: foreign-policy elevated (×1.15)</td><td align="center">grundlag ×1.40</td><td align="center">9.80; HD03231 = 10.35</td><td><strong>HD03231 (10.35)</strong> ← lead would shift</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario E: ordinary fiscal de-prioritised (×0.85)</td><td align="center">grundlag ×1.40, fiscal ×0.85</td><td align="center">9.80; HD03100 = 8.50</td><td><strong>KU33 (9.80)</strong> ← lead would shift</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The lead-story decision is <strong>stable for baseline</strong> and <strong>stable for scenarios B, C</strong> (3 / 5 scenarios). It would shift to KU33 only under a stronger democratic-infrastructure preference (Scenario A) or fiscal-de-prioritisation (Scenario E), and to HD03231 only under foreign-policy elevation (Scenario D). The baseline DIW v1.0 weights remain the canonical methodology call. No alternative scheme produces a fourth alternative leader.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-distribution-histogram">📊 Significance Distribution Histogram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-distribution-histogram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-distribution-histogram">📊 Significance Distribution Histogram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-distribution-histogram"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-distribution-histogram">📊 Significance Distribution
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weighted Score Band</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Documents</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>9.5 – 10.0</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03100 (10.0), HD01KU33 (9.8)</td></tr><tr><td>8.5 – 9.4</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD0399 (9.0), HD03236 (9.0), HD03246 (9.0), HD01KU32 (8.75), HD03231 (8.55), HD01SfU22 (8.55)</td></tr><tr><td>7.0 – 8.4</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD03232, HD01UFöU3, Prop 235, Prop 229, HD03240, HD03245</td></tr><tr><td>5.5 – 6.9</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD03237, HD01CU27, HD03244, HD03242, HD03239, HD01CU28</td></tr><tr><td>4.0 – 5.4</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD03233, HD024098, HD01CU22, HD01CU42, HD10438, HD11719</td></tr><tr><td>&#x3C; 4.0</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10437, HD11718</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Average weighted significance</strong>: 6.85 / 10 (across 28 scored items). 14 documents above the 7.0 mandatory-H3 gate. <strong>Average rank places Week 16 in the top 5 % of legislatively-loaded weeks since 2010</strong> (parliamentary-week baseline mean ≈ 3.8). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-document-class">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Document Class<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-document-class"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-by-document-class">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Document Class<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-by-document-class"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-document-class">🗳️ Election 20
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document Class</th><th align="center">Election Salience</th><th>Reasoning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Spring Fiscal Trilogy (HD03100/0399/236)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Cost-of-living is #1 voter issue; Q3 2026 macro = Sep 2026 verdict</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>KU33 second reading post-election ⇒ becomes campaign vector</td></tr><tr><td>JuU15 (HD03246)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Brott + ordning is #2 voter issue; Tidö centerpiece</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine package (HD03231/HD03232)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Universal cross-party consensus dampens electoral exploit</td></tr><tr><td>Migration trio</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>SD-base reinforcement; ECHR challenge could reverse pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP (UFöU3)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Försvar is #4 voter issue; symbolic NATO operationalisation</td></tr><tr><td>Energy (NU 240/239)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Climate vs fuel-tax cut creates internal contradictions</td></tr><tr><td>Housing/AML (CU27/CU28)</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Implementation-window 2026/27; minimal Sep salience</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Lead-Story Decision uses this scoring directly</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a> §Per-Document Classification cross-links each row</li>
@@ -2432,7 +2432,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5 (DIW v1.0)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>STK-ID</strong></td><td>STK-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-style-guide.md</code> (6-lens stakeholder analysis) + Election 2026 implication grid</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Lenses</strong></td><td>6 — Government coalition · Parliamentary opposition · Civil society / general public · International / EU / NATO · Industry &#x26; business · Media &#x26; investigative journalism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--six-lens-stakeholder-matrix">🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--six-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-six-lens-stakeholder-matrix">🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-six-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2514,8 +2514,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--six-lens-stakeholder-matrix">🎯 Six-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Top Concern Week 16</th><th>Top Action / Posture</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟦 <strong>Government coalition (M+KD+L) + SD</strong></td><td>Execute fiscal trilogy + JuU15 + KU + Ukraine package without coalition fracture</td><td>Sequencing discipline, narrative co-ordination, Lagrådet engagement</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>🟥 <strong>Parliamentary opposition (S, V, MP, C)</strong></td><td>Counter-budget, KU33 critique, migration counter-motions, climate framing</td><td>S budget presentation; V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation; C swing positioning; ECHR predicate</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>👥 <strong>Civil society / general public</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living, security, women's-violence services, regional services</td><td>Demand for relief; concern over R1 hybrid; vigilance on KU33</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>🌍 <strong>International / EU / NATO / Ukraine</strong></td><td>Sweden's eFP operationalisation; Council-of-Europe tribunal architecture</td><td>Coordinated tribunal advocacy; NATO operational integration</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>🏭 <strong>Industry &#x26; business</strong></td><td>Energy-system reform; forestry framework; bostadsregister; AML compliance; police-recruitment investment</td><td>Compliance preparation; investment alignment with HD03240 + HD03242; AML costs absorbed</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>📰 <strong>Media &#x26; investigative journalism</strong></td><td>KU33 chilling-effect risk; cross-cluster rhetorical exposure; election-cycle disinformation pressure</td><td>Press-freedom NGO coordination; verification-discipline against T1</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support">🟦 Lens 1 — Government Coalition (M+KD+L) + SD Parliamentary Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support">🟦 Lens 1 — Government Coalition (M+KD+L) + SD Parliamentary Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1--government-coalition-mkdl--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2576,13 +2576,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Position Week 16</th><th>Election 2026 Stake</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader, package signatory</td><td>Personally tabled fiscal trilogy + Ukraine architecture</td><td>Owns economic-stewardship narrative; Nuremberg framing for SD-friction prevention</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, FM)</td><td>Vårproposition author</td><td>Fiscal credibility custodian; defended Nordic-GDP gap with stimulus framing</td><td>Q3 2026 macro = Sep verdict</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, FM)</td><td>Tribunal architect</td><td>Norm-entrepreneurship voice 2026-04-16</td><td>Norm-leadership capital</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, JM)</td><td>KU33 + JuU15 owner</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning"; juvenile-offender execution</td><td>Legacy on rule-of-law definition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson</strong> (M, DM)</td><td>NATO eFP owner</td><td>Försvarsmakten operational owner</td><td>First-NATO-deployment legacy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong> (KD, party leader, EM)</td><td>Coalition partner</td><td>Energy / law-and-order alignment</td><td>Coalition continuity stake</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader, AM)</td><td>Coalition partner</td><td>KU33 + migration trio identity strain</td><td>Liberal brand under pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong> (SD, leader)</td><td>Parliamentary support</td><td>145-142 leverage; migration-trio political owner</td><td>Cabinet-entry post-Sep ambition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-key-documents-cited">Key Documents Cited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-cited"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-documents-cited">Key Documents Cited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-cited"></a></h4>
 <p><code>HD03100</code> · <code>HD0399</code> · <code>HD03236</code> · <code>HD03246</code> · <code>HD01KU32</code> · <code>HD01KU33</code> · <code>HD03231</code> · <code>HD03232</code> · <code>HD01UFöU3</code> · <code>HD01SfU22</code> · <code>HD03240</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens"></a></h4>
 <p>Coalition will run on a <strong>four-pillar platform</strong>: economic-stewardship (fiscal trilogy + macro execution), law-and-order (JuU15 + police-training HD03237), national security (NATO eFP + Ukraine architecture), migration tightening (SfU22 + Prop 235/229). Vulnerable on Nordic-GDP gap, climate self-contradiction, and L-party identity strain. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c">🟥 Lens 2 — Parliamentary Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-1">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c">🟥 Lens 2 — Parliamentary Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2--parliamentary-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-map-1">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2631,18 +2631,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-1">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Position Week 16</th><th>Election 2026 Stake</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, leader)</td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Counter-budget arithmetic; KU33 position decisive variable</td><td>PM-candidate; coalition arithmetic owner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong> (S, finance spokesman)</td><td>Counter-budget architect</td><td>Cost-of-living narrative + Nordic-GDP-gap framing</td><td>Economic credibility duel with Svantesson</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, leader)</td><td>V leader</td><td>Against migration trio + KU33 + budget</td><td>Attentive-voter mobilisation 0.5–1.5 pp on KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>MP leader</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate; climate-credibility critic</td><td>Green-vote ceiling expansion via fuel-tax-cut critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong> (C, leader)</td><td>Centre-bloc swing</td><td>Migration counter-motion architect</td><td>Survival via differentiation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Märta Stenevi</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>MP leader</td><td>Co-leader on climate + KU33</td><td>MP coalition leverage</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-counter-strategies-this-week">Counter-Strategies This Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-strategies-this-week"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-counter-strategies-this-week">Counter-Strategies This Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-strategies-this-week"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S</strong>: Counter-budget published 2026-04-18 (HD024098 motion class) emphasising Nordic-GDP gap, employment, welfare investment</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong>: Sharp KU33 critique; structural opposition to migration trio; demand for Strasbourg challenge</li>
 <li><strong>MP</strong>: Fuel-tax-cut climate critique; coalition with V on KU33; constructive engagement on Electricity System Act</li>
 <li><strong>C</strong>: Migration counter-motion (with V + MP); own budget alternative; KU33 cross-party negotiation posture</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-1">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-1">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Opposition contests on <strong>cost-of-living + climate + civil-rights</strong>. S best-positioned to claim cost-of-living; V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33 + migration; C survives via differentiation from both blocs. Key risk: opposition fragmentation prevents single PM-alternative narrative. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-3--civil-society--general-public">👥 Lens 3 — Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-3--civil-society--general-public"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents">Concerns Mapped to Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-3--civil-society--general-public">👥 Lens 3 — Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3--civil-society--general-public"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents">Concerns Mapped to Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2699,7 +2699,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-concerns-mapped-to-documents">Concerns Mapped to Documents<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Public Concern</th><th>Top Document(s)</th><th align="center">Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cost of living (fuel, electricity, food)</td><td>HD03236, HD0399, HD03100</td><td align="center">🟢 Relief</td></tr><tr><td>Crime + safety</td><td>HD03246, HD03237, HD01CU27</td><td align="center">🟢 Tightening</td></tr><tr><td>Women's violence services</td><td>HD03245, HD10438</td><td align="center">🟡 Policy + funding gap</td></tr><tr><td>Press freedom + transparency</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Migration / asylum-seeker rights</td><td>HD01SfU22, Prop 235, Prop 229</td><td align="center">🔴 Tightening</td></tr><tr><td>Climate + energy</td><td>HD03240, HD03239, HD03236, HD03242</td><td align="center">🟡 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market integrity</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td align="center">🟢 Improvement</td></tr><tr><td>Regional service equity</td><td>HD11718 (Skåne), HD11719</td><td align="center">🔴 Concern</td></tr><tr><td>National security</td><td>HD01UFöU3, HD03231</td><td align="center">🟢 Strengthening</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-civil-society-voices">Civil-Society Voices<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society-voices"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society-voices">Civil-Society Voices<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society-voices"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Press-freedom NGOs</strong> (SJF, TU, Utgivarna): joint statement on KU33 expected Q2 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Domestic-violence shelters</strong> (Roks, Unizon): HD10438 interpellation reflects funding stress</li>
@@ -2707,11 +2707,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-civil-society-voices">Civil-Society Voices<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>Climate / environmental NGOs</strong> (Naturskyddsföreningen, KPR): fuel-tax-cut critique</li>
 <li><strong>Lantmäteriet citizen-impact</strong>: bostadsregister change affects ~2 M bostadsrätter holders</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-2">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-2">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-2"></a></h4>
 <p>Public salience: cost-of-living > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat > migration > grundlag. KU33 only enters top-5 if a chilling-effect case breaks before Sep 2026. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine">🌍 Lens 4 — International / EU / NATO / Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-2">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine">🌍 Lens 4 — International / EU / NATO / Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4--international--eu--nato--ukraine"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-map-2">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2763,10 +2763,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-2">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Position Week 16</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong> (Ukraine)</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 2025 co-signatory</td><td>Tribunal political guarantor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NATO HQ + Allied Command</strong></td><td>NATO eFP framework</td><td>Welcomes Sweden Bn-task-group as full-spectrum operational integration</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td>Tribunal framework</td><td>Founding-member processing for HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Euroclear / Russian assets venues</strong></td><td>Reparations architecture</td><td>EUR 260 B immobilised — operational base for HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>EAA implementation oversight (KU32)</td><td>Welcomes grundlag entrenchment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UNHCR Sweden country office</strong></td><td>Migration-trio scrutiny</td><td>Concerns to be reflected in country report</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (adversarial)</strong></td><td>Tribunal target + NATO opponent</td><td>Hybrid-response posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nordic peers (DK, NO, FI)</strong></td><td>Comparative reference</td><td>DK fiscal stewardship benchmark; FI hybrid-response template; NO statutory-trigger model for KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-3">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-3">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-3"></a></h4>
 <p>International reception of Sweden's Ukraine + NATO + grundlag posture is uniformly positive within EU/NATO; Russia + adversarial actors contribute to T1 risk. Cross-party Ukraine consensus precludes effective opposition exploitation; international dimension of campaign therefore <strong>dampened relative to domestic dimensions</strong>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-5--industry--business">🏭 Lens 5 — Industry &#x26; Business<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-5--industry--business"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-5--industry--business">🏭 Lens 5 — Industry &#x26; Business<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5--industry--business"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2823,11 +2823,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--lens-5--industry--business">🏭 Lens 5 — Industry &#x26; Business
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sector</th><th>Document Impact</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Energy (utilities, grid)</td><td>HD03240 (Electricity System Act)</td><td>Investment alignment for smart-grid + storage</td></tr><tr><td>Renewable energy</td><td>HD03239 (wind power municipal)</td><td>Re-engage stalled projects</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry</td><td>HD03242 (active forestry framework)</td><td>Resume deferred capital allocation</td></tr><tr><td>Telecom</td><td>HD03244 (interoperability) + HD03233 (anti-fraud)</td><td>Compliance + EU alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel retail / logistics</td><td>HD03236 (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>Pricing pass-through; demand-side response</td></tr><tr><td>Real estate / housing</td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 + HD01CU22</td><td>AML controls + register-data feed integration</td></tr><tr><td>Defence industry (Saab, BAE, etc.)</td><td>HD01UFöU3 + försvarsanslag</td><td>Operational support contracts</td></tr><tr><td>Police / public sector</td><td>HD03237 (paid police training)</td><td>Recruitment ramp-up</td></tr><tr><td>Banking &#x26; financial services</td><td>HD01CU27 (AML)</td><td>Onboarding-process update</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-4">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-4">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-4"></a></h4>
 <p>Industry generally welcomes the stability of legislative pipeline; concerns on (a) climate signal coherence (HD03236 vs HD03240); (b) implementation timeline for housing register; (c) AML compliance burden. <strong>No major industry actor opposes the package as a whole</strong> — indicating coordinated stakeholder consultation in advance. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lens-6--media--investigative-journalism">📰 Lens 6 — Media &#x26; Investigative Journalism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lens-6--media--investigative-journalism"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-concerns">Concerns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-lens-6--media--investigative-journalism">📰 Lens 6 — Media &#x26; Investigative Journalism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6--media--investigative-journalism"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-concerns">Concerns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-concerns"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2864,17 +2864,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-concerns">Concerns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Concern</th><th>Document(s)</th><th align="center">Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 chilling effect on source-protection</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH (decadal)</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster rhetorical exposure (press-freedom-abroad-vs-home)</td><td>HD03231 + HD01KU33 juxtaposition</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH (campaign cycle)</td></tr><tr><td>Election-cycle disinformation pressure (T1 vector)</td><td>T1 (threat-analysis.md)</td><td align="center">🔴 CRITICAL (continuous)</td></tr><tr><td>FOIA/offentlighet workflow disruption</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Journalist-source confidentiality</td><td>HD01KU33 + JuU15</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination">Press-Freedom NGO Coordination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination">Press-Freedom NGO Coordination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-ngo-coordination"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SJF (Svenska Journalistförbundet)</strong>: prepares remissvar on KU33 + statutory-clarity demand</li>
 <li><strong>TU (Tidningsutgivarna)</strong>: industry-association joint statement</li>
 <li><strong>Utgivarna</strong>: editorial-independence platform</li>
 <li><strong>RSF + Freedom House</strong>: international index implications</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-5">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-election-2026-lens-5">Election 2026 Lens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-5"></a></h4>
 <p>Investigative journalism becomes a <strong>double resource</strong>: (a) the operational instrument for accountability through the campaign; (b) the <em>target</em> of disinformation under T1 vector. Newsroom resilience programmes + civil-society partnerships are critical defensive infrastructure. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--influence-network-map">🌐 Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--influence-network-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-map">🌐 Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOV["🟦 Government Coalition&#x3C;br/>M+KD+L+SD"]
     OPP["🟥 Opposition Bloc&#x3C;br/>S+V+MP+C"]
@@ -2928,7 +2928,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--influence-network-map">🌐 Influence-Network Map<a class="" aria-hi
     style IND fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style MED fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Stakeholder<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications by Stakeholder<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2991,7 +2991,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-by-stakeholder">🗳️ Election 2026
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Key Election Move</th><th align="center">Decisive Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government</td><td>Fiscal-stewardship + JuU15 + NATO + Ukraine campaign messaging</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3 (macro-data lock-in)</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Counter-budget definition + KU33 second-reading position</td><td align="center">2026-Q3 (manifesto lock-in)</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Single-issue mobilisation on KU33 + migration</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Climate-credibility framing + KU33 alliance with V</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Centre-positioning + survival messaging</td><td align="center">2026-Q3 (poll trajectory)</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Migration-delivery showcase + Cabinet-entry signalling</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>Civil society</td><td>Cost-of-living, services protection, KU33 vigilance</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>EU/NATO solidarity in early Q3 if Russian hybrid event</td><td align="center">Event-driven</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Investment-stability messaging</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3</td></tr><tr><td>Media</td><td>Election-disinformation defensive operations</td><td align="center">2026-Q3 (campaign peak)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Cross-Party Vote Matrix maps party-by-document positions</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §Stakeholder SWOT compresses these perspectives into 4-quadrant grid</li>
@@ -3002,7 +3002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder analysis (<code>political-style-guide.md</code>) + Election 2026 implication grid (<code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5 Election lens)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3034,7 +3034,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SCN-ID</strong></td><td>SCN-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>Forward horizon 2026-04-18 → 2026-Q4 (90-day base + post-Sep election)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian priors + ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scenarios</strong></td><td>3 base + 2 wildcards</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3095,10 +3095,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands">🎯 Three Base Scenarios 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Wildcard</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Impact if realised</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid escalation</strong> materially shifts campaign agenda</td><td align="center">P = 0.20 (rising)</td><td>Adds ~5 pp to government continuity probability; shifts S3 → ~0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W2</strong></td><td><strong>ECHR strike-down on inhibition orders</strong> lands pre-Sep</td><td align="center">P = 0.15</td><td>Damages government legal credibility; shifts S2 → ~0.40</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s1--continuity-scenario-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s1--continuity-scenario-p--050"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s1--continuity-scenario-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--continuity-scenario-p--050"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h4>
 <p>The M+KD+L government, supported in Riksdag by SD, is re-confirmed after Sep 2026. The Tidö working majority extends. Vårpropositionens fiscal architecture executes; KU32 + KU33 grundlag amendments ratify in second reading; tribunal architecture operationalises; NATO eFP fully deploys.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3141,7 +3141,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Q3 2026 macro improvement (GDP > 1.5 % run-rate, unemployment ↓ to ~8.3 %)</td><td>KI Konjunkturinstitutet + SCB Q3 report</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>JuU15 vote pattern repeats (no SD defection on subsequent close votes)</td><td>Voteringsregister</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.70)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>KU33 second reading passes (post-election Riksdag composition supports)</td><td>Sep 2026 election result</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Russian hybrid response containable (no major event triggering crisis)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.65)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ECHR migration challenge does not strike down pre-Sep</td><td>Strasbourg docket</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.80)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Q2/Q3 2026 macro data (KI, SCB)</li>
 <li>Coalition close-vote frequency post-2026-04-15</li>
@@ -3149,7 +3149,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>ECHR docket on inhibition-orders cases</li>
 <li>Polls trajectory (M+KD+L+SD vs S+V+MP+C)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Fiscal trilogy executes; KU33 ratifies; tribunal operationalises; NATO Bn-task-group deploys</li>
 <li>✅ Election message: "ekonomin tryggare, brotten färre, försvaret starkare"</li>
@@ -3157,10 +3157,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>⚠️ Continued L-party identity strain on migration trio</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (S-led minority)  (P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (S-led minority)  (P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-s-led-minority--p--035"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h4>
 <p>S becomes largest party Sep 2026. Government coalition forms on <strong>S minority</strong> + occasional V/MP/C cooperation. KU33 second reading <strong>fails</strong> (or is rewritten). Vårpropositionens fiscal arithmetic re-opened. Migration trio retained but reformed. Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained intact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3197,14 +3197,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Cost-of-living salience captures voters</td><td>Pre-Sep poll trajectory</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Q3 2026 macro disappoints (GDP &#x3C; 1.0 %, unemployment > 8.5 %)</td><td>KI + SCB</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.45)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Climate-credibility erosion mobilises MP/V attentive voters (~1.5 pp)</td><td>Polls</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>S leadership crystallises post-election coalition arithmetic credibly</td><td>Andersson behaviour</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.70)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-1">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-1">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Cost-of-living poll questions + party-of-best-economic-stewardship</li>
 <li>Climate-policy salience trajectory</li>
 <li>S counter-budget public reception</li>
 <li>Government close-vote frequency (signalling weakness)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>⚠️ Vårpropositionens fiscal architecture re-opened (welfare ↑, försvar ↔)</li>
 <li>✅ Climate-policy re-prioritisation (ev fuel-tax retention; HD03240 acceleration)</li>
@@ -3213,10 +3213,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li>✅ Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained (cross-party consensus durability)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority  (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority  (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority--p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h4>
 <p>S + V + MP combined exceed 175 seats Sep 2026. MP/V enter government. KU33 second reading explicitly rejected. Vårproposition reversed in significant part. Migration trio reversed or partially rewritten. Ukraine + NATO retained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-2">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-2">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3259,14 +3259,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-2">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Major coalition fracture pre-Sep (multi-vote government losses)</td><td>Voteringsregister</td><td align="center">🟥 L (~0.20)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>KU33 + migration + climate critiques converge as single campaign frame</td><td>Polls + media</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.30)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Russian hybrid event does not catalyse security-frame (would benefit government)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>C survives at >5 % parliamentary threshold</td><td>Polls</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>V-MP coalition arithmetic with S accepted</td><td>Polls + leadership statements</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-2">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-2">Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Government close-vote frequency</li>
 <li>Press-freedom-incident catalysing (KU33 trigger event)</li>
 <li>Climate-policy salience (Q2/Q3)</li>
 <li>Polls trajectory (S+V+MP vs M+KD+L+SD)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>⚠️ Reversal of significant Tidö-deal architecture</li>
 <li>✅ Climate-policy strong re-prioritisation</li>
@@ -3276,15 +3276,15 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li>⚠️ Cabinet learning-curve dampens early-term execution</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising">🌪️ W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation Wildcard (P = 0.20, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-events">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising">🌪️ W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation Wildcard (P = 0.20, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-wildcard-p--020-rising"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-events">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Major attribution-confirmed cyber attack on Swedish critical infrastructure</li>
 <li>Sabotage / destruction of Nordic submarine cable</li>
 <li>Instrumentalised migration on Finnish border (Finnish 2023–24 precedent)</li>
 <li>Election-disinformation campaign with measurable poll-swing impact</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cascading-consequences">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     W1["W1 Trigger:&#x3C;br/>Major Russian hybrid event"]
     W1 --> SHIFT["Campaign agenda shift to security"]
@@ -3298,21 +3298,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden
     style SHIFT fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style GOV_UP fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style SD_UP fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S1 probability rises to ~0.55</li>
 <li>S2 probability falls to ~0.30</li>
 <li>S3 probability falls to ~0.05</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015">🌪️ W2 — ECHR Strike-Down Pre-Sep (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-events-1">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015">🌪️ W2 — ECHR Strike-Down Pre-Sep (P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2--echr-strike-down-pre-sep-p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-events-1">Trigger Events<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-events-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Strasbourg admits V/C/MP case to merits + issues judgment</li>
 <li>Partial requirement to add appeal mechanism in inhibition-orders regime</li>
 <li>Government legal-credibility narrative damaged</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences-1">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cascading-consequences-1">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-consequences-1"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     W2["W2 Trigger:&#x3C;br/>ECHR strike-down on migration trio"]
     W2 --> LEGAL["Government legal-credibility hit"]
@@ -3326,14 +3326,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-cascading-consequences-1">Cascading Consequences<a class="" aria-hidd
     style LEGAL fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style S_UP fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style R4 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1">Implications for Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-base-scenarios-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S1 probability falls to ~0.42</li>
 <li>S2 probability rises to ~0.40</li>
 <li>S3 probability rises to ~0.18</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome">🎯 ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) — Sep 2026 Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome">🎯 ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) — Sep 2026 Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong>: ACH evaluates each scenario against each indicator; scenarios that <strong>survive contradiction</strong> with most indicators rank highest.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3405,7 +3405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses--sep-2026-outcome">🎯 ACH (An
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">S1 (Continuity)</th><th align="center">S2 (S-led)</th><th align="center">S3 (S+V+MP)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q3 macro improves (≥ 1.5 % GDP)</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">I</td></tr><tr><td>Q3 macro disappoints (≤ 1.0 %)</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Major Russian hybrid event</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">I</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR strike-down pre-Sep</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Climate salience top-3</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Cost-of-living top-1</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">I (S+V+MP arithmetic)</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture (multi-vote losses)</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>Universal Ukraine consensus durable</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 chilling case pre-Sep</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">C</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>C = consistent with scenario · I = inconsistent</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates">🕰️ 90-Day Monitoring Indicators (with Triggers and Bayesian Updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates">🕰️ 90-Day Monitoring Indicators (with Triggers and Bayesian Updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3473,7 +3473,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-90-day-monitoring-indicators-with-triggers-and-bayesian-updates">
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Reading Frequency</th><th>Direction → Scenario</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q2/Q3 GDP / unemployment data</td><td>KI + SCB</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>Up → S1; Down → S2</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition close-vote count</td><td>Voteringsregister</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Many → S2/S3; Few → S1</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO hybrid bulletins</td><td>SÄPO open assessment</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Major event → W1 → S1↑</td></tr><tr><td>Strasbourg ECHR docket</td><td>ECtHR</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Admission → W2 → S2/S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom NGO incidents</td><td>RSF + SJF</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Trigger event → S2/S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 second-reading polls</td><td>SVT/SCB</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>S+V+MP advantage → S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet KU32/KU33 yttrande</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>One-off</td><td>Strict scoping → R2↓</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-policy salience polls</td><td>Polls</td><td>Continuous</td><td>High salience → S2/S3↑</td></tr><tr><td>Polls (party-by-party)</td><td>Demoskop, Sifo, Inizio</td><td>Continuous</td><td>M+KD+L+SD ≥ 175 → S1; S+V+MP+C ≥ 175 → S3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3517,7 +3517,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory">🗳️ Election 2026 Impli
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>S1</th><th>S2</th><th>S3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Government re-elected</td><td>S largest, minority</td><td>S+V+MP majority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>M+KD+L+SD repeated</td><td>S minority + cooperation</td><td>S+V+MP government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Security + economy</td><td>Cost-of-living + climate</td><td>Civil-rights + climate + cost-of-living</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Climate self-contradiction</td><td>Coalition arithmetic</td><td>Cabinet learning-curve</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>KU33 ratifies; fiscal architecture executes</td><td>Fiscal re-opened; KU33 fails</td><td>Fiscal reversed; KU33 fails; migration reformed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Top Risk Indicators feed scenario triggers (R1=W1, R3=W2, R4=S2/S3)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §T1 = W1 trigger</li>
@@ -3528,7 +3528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if W1/W2 trigger fires) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian + ACH</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3560,7 +3560,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RSK-ID</strong></td><td>RSK-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x (5×5 Likelihood × Impact + Bayesian update + ALARP + cascading-risk)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Risk Inventory</strong></td><td>8 priority risks · 4 watch-list items</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-risk-indicators-55-matrix">🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-risk-indicators-55-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-risk-indicators-55-matrix">🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-indicators-55-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3649,7 +3649,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-risk-indicators-55-matrix">🎯 Top Risk Indicators (5×5 Matrix
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Likelihood (1-5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1-5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare retaliation</strong> post-tribunal (HD03231) + NATO eFP (HD01UFöU3) — cyber, sabotage, disinformation, infrastructure harassment, instrumentalised migration</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>20 / 25</strong> → <strong>18 / 25</strong> with mitigation</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> — "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretive frontier; chilling effect on investigative journalism over 5+ years</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td><strong>Migration trio ECHR strike-down or partial reversal</strong> (SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229) under Article 8 + 13 challenge</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition fracture under SD pressure</strong> — post-145–142 JuU15 vote, future close votes risky; SD as kingmaker</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong> → <strong>11 / 25</strong> with sequencing discipline</td><td align="center">🟠 MANAGE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td><strong>Climate-credibility erosion</strong> — fuel-tax cut (HD03236) + activity-coupled forestry (HD03242) undermine green brand at exactly the green-policy peak (HD03240)</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal effectiveness without US</strong> — limited operational caseload if US, China, major Global South do not cooperate</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE MITIGATION</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td><strong>Lantmäteriet bostadsregister IT delivery slip</strong> — Jan 2027 deadline (HD01CU28); political cost of delivery failure</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R8</strong></td><td><strong>Reparations-fatigue / decadal commitment burden</strong> (HD03232) — UNCC precedent suggests 30-year horizon; political-sustainability challenges</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8 / 25</strong> → <strong>7 / 25</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 TOLERATE</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact">🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact">🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Coalition + Geopolitical Risks — Week 16
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -3667,7 +3667,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-heat-map-likelihood--impact">🌡️ Risk Heat Map (Likeliho
     R7 Lantmäteriet IT slip: [0.55, 0.55]
     R8 Reparations fatigue: [0.35, 0.75]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--90-day-risk-calendar">📅 90-Day Risk Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--90-day-risk-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-90-day-risk-calendar">📅 90-Day Risk Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-risk-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3730,7 +3730,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--90-day-risk-calendar">📅 90-Day Risk Calendar<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger Event</th><th>Risk(s) Updated</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td>HD03236 chamber vote</td><td>R4 (coalition discipline test) · R5 (climate framing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-27</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>R2 + R4 (parliamentary accountability)</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>R2 (Bayesian decisive update)</td></tr><tr><td>May–Jun 2026</td><td>KU33/KU32 first chamber reading (vilande beslut)</td><td>R2 + R4</td></tr><tr><td>Late May / Jun 2026</td><td>Ukraine HD03231/HD03232 chamber vote</td><td>R1 (escalation trigger) · R6</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-Q3</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deploys to Finland</td><td>R1 (operational visibility ↑)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>V + C + MP file ECHR challenge on inhibition orders</td><td>R3 (litigation predicate)</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous (heightened)</td><td>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins, Nordic-Baltic intel</td><td>R1 (continuous monitoring)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-13</strong></td><td>General election</td><td>R2 (post-election Riksdag composition) · R4 (coalition arithmetic resets)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-Q4</td><td>Lantmäteriet IT procurement notice</td><td>R7 (delivery confirmation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-living-risks">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Living Risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-rules-living-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-rules-living-risks">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Living Risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-rules-living-risks"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong> (per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> §Bayesian Updating): each priority risk has named observable signals that trigger explicit prior/posterior updates. Failure to update post-trigger ⇒ stale risk inventory.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3888,7 +3888,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-living-risks">🔄 Bayesian Update Rules (Livi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Observable Signal</th><th align="center">Direction</th><th align="center">Magnitude</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Major cyber/sabotage event attributed to Russia</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+4 to +6</td><td>SÄPO bulletin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Quiet 6-month period</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Continuous</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>NATO Article 5 invocation by another member</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>NATO HQ</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Lagrådet strict scoping of "formellt tillförd bevisning"</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−4</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Lagrådet silent on interpretive test</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+4</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Press-freedom-NGO joint remissvar critical of language</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+1</td><td>SJF / TU / Utgivarna</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>UNHCR reports concerns on Swedish migration practice</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>UNHCR Sweden country report</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Government adds appeal mechanism in 2nd-reading amendment</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−4</td><td>SfU committee record</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Strasbourg admits V/C/MP case to merits</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>ECtHR docket</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>Successful close-vote (≤ 5-vote margin) post-JuU15</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+1 each</td><td>Voteringsregister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>SD parliamentary leader publicly threatens withdrawal</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>Public statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>L party-leader publicly distances from migration trio</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>Public statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Q3 2026 emissions-trajectory data (Naturvårdsverket) shows reversal</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>Naturvårdsverket bulletin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet flags fuel-tax-cut emissions impact</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+1</td><td>KPR annual report</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>US public tribunal endorsement</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−4</td><td>US State Department</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>First Russian official summoned by tribunal</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Council of Europe</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>US explicit non-participation statement</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+2</td><td>US official statement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet IT procurement notice published Q3 2026</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Lantmäteriet procurement portal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td>Procurement notice slip beyond Q3 2026</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">+3</td><td>Procurement portal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R8</strong></td><td>First reparations-payment disbursement</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">−2</td><td>Damages Commission Secretariat</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As Low As Reasonably Practicable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong>: each risk has explicit treatment-ladder rungs. Mitigation success measured against ladder progress.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3953,7 +3953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--alarp-ladder-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable">🪜 ALARP Ladder (As
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Current Rung</th><th>Next Rung</th><th>Decision-Maker</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Heightened SÄPO/MSB posture; Nordic-Baltic intel coordination</td><td>Public-resilience information campaign + critical-infrastructure hardening audit</td><td>SÄPO + MSB + Justitiedepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R2</strong></td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO consultation</td><td>Statutory clarification of "formellt tillförd bevisning" in 2nd-reading amendment</td><td>Justitiedepartementet + KU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Government legal review; UNHCR consultation</td><td>Add explicit appeal-mechanism + judicial-review compatibility text</td><td>Justitiedepartementet + SfU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R4</strong></td><td>Sequencing discipline post-JuU15; pre-vote SD-buy-in management</td><td>Cabinet-level coalition dialogue + L-party brand-management coordination</td><td>PM Office + SD parliamentary leader</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Communications strategy elevating HD03240 visibility</td><td>Compensatory climate-policy commitment (e.g. accelerated EV-charge investment)</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R6</strong></td><td>Quiet US engagement; Council of Europe leadership</td><td>Bilateral state-cooperation agreements with G7 + EU members</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R7</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet capacity assessment; political backstop budget</td><td>Procurement supplier ramp-up + delivery-milestone publication</td><td>Lantmäteriet + Civilutskottet oversight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R8</strong></td><td>Reparations-secretariat staffing</td><td>Public-narrative discipline + multi-year budget commitment</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cascading-risk-map">🌊 Cascading Risk Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cascading-risk-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-map">🌊 Cascading Risk Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     R1["R1&#x3C;br/>Russian hybrid event"] --> CASCADE1["Public-confidence shock"]
     CASCADE1 --> R4["R4&#x3C;br/>Coalition fracture risk ↑"]
@@ -3984,7 +3984,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cascading-risk-map">🌊 Cascading Risk Map<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style NORM fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style MP_RISE fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability">🎯 Coalition-Fragility Quadrant (Operational Stability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability">🎯 Coalition-Fragility Quadrant (Operational Stability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Coalition Fragility — Per Issue Domain
     x-axis Tight Discipline --> Loose Discipline
@@ -4006,7 +4006,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-fragility-quadrant-operational-stability">🎯 Coalition-F
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: top-right quadrant (Migration trio + JuU15) = highest fragility under SD leverage; bottom-left (Ukraine + NATO + KU32) = stable consensus. Future-vote risk concentrates in top half. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4038,7 +4038,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Risk realisation pre-Sep 2026 disproportionately damages government incumbency narrative; R1 + R3 + R5 = highest pre-Sep impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>Continuity (P=0.50) preserves R8 burden but mitigates R4; S-led (P=0.35) renegotiates R3 + R5; S+V+MP (P=0.15) reverses KU33 ⇒ extinguishes R2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>R1 (security) + R5 (climate) most likely to enter voter consideration; R2 (constitutional) requires triggering case to register</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>R4 = most exposed if government close-vote tally rises; R3 = most exposed if Strasbourg ruling lands pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>R8 = decadal — reparations sustainment crosses multiple governments</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §T1–T8 = same risks viewed as government threats</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §T1 deep-dives R1 with STRIDE + Attack Tree</li>
@@ -4048,7 +4048,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if R1 trigger fires) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x (5×5 + Bayesian + ALARP + cascading)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4080,8 +4080,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SWOT-ID</strong></td><td>SWOT-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0 (TOWS interference + scenario branching + cross-bloc evaluation)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Lenses</strong></td><td>Government coalition (M+KD+L) + parliamentary support (SD); Opposition blocs (S; V; MP; C); Civil society / general public — <strong>6 distinct perspectives</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support">🎯 Government Coalition SWOT (M + KD + L + SD parliamentary support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--strengths">🟢 Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support">🎯 Government Coalition SWOT (M + KD + L + SD parliamentary support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-coalition-swot-m--kd--l--sd-parliamentary-support"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">🟢 Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4130,7 +4130,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--strengths">🟢 Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1</strong></td><td><strong>Tidö working majority operationally validated</strong> — JuU15 vote 145–142, pure bloc, zero defections</td><td>JuU15 voteringsregister 2026-04-15 (chamber vote date per voteringsprotokoll; PR description's 2026-04-16 reflects publication date); HD03246</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S2</strong></td><td><strong>Comprehensive legislative agenda execution</strong> — fiscal trilogy + criminal-justice + migration + foreign-policy + energy delivered in single week</td><td>HD03100/0399/236; HD03246; SfU22; HD03231; HD03240</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3</strong></td><td><strong>NATO operational integration</strong> — first major Försvarsmakten deployment under eFP (1,200 troops to Finland); shifts from accession to operational posture</td><td>HD01UFöU3; UFöU committee record; Försvarsmakten timeline</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4</strong></td><td><strong>Cross-party Ukraine consensus</strong> — tribunal + reparations propositions enjoy near-universal support (~349 MPs); pre-empts SD/domestic opposition via Nuremberg framing</td><td>HD03231; HD03232; FM Stenergard verbatim 2026-04-16</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S5</strong></td><td><strong>Cost-of-living relief instrument</strong> — fuel-tax cut (82 öre) + el/gas relief responds to most-cited voter pain point</td><td>HD03236; KI Konjunkturinstitutet 2026-Q1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S6</strong></td><td><strong>Constitutional reform credibility</strong> — KU advancing both KU32 (rights-positive accessibility) + KU33 (investigative integrity) at first reading shows constitutional craftsmanship capacity</td><td>HD01KU32; HD01KU33; KU committee record</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--weaknesses">🟡 Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">🟡 Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4179,7 +4179,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--weaknesses">🟡 Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Razor-thin majority</strong> — 3-vote margin (145-142) in JuU15 = no slack for further close votes; one defection ⇒ government loses</td><td>JuU15 protokoll</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td><strong>Sweden underperforms Nordic peers</strong> on growth — 0.82 % 2024 vs Denmark 3.5 %, Norway 2.1 % (World Bank); narrative vulnerability</td><td><code>economic-data.json</code>; World Bank GDP series</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td><strong>Unemployment at 8.7 % 2025</strong> — highest since pandemic; structural challenge undermines fiscal-success framing</td><td><code>economic-data.json</code>; SCB AKU</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td><strong>Rhetorical self-contradiction</strong> — fuel-tax cut (HD03236) undercuts simultaneous green-transition narrative (HD03240 + HD03239); MP/V exploit-ready</td><td>HD03236 + HD03240 + HD03239 juxtaposition; Klimatpolitiska rådet 2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>Press-freedom-abroad-vs-home contradiction</strong> — championing Nuremberg accountability (HD03231) while narrowing TF at home (HD01KU33)</td><td>TOWS S4 × T1; opposition rhetoric library</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W6</strong></td><td><strong>L-party identity strain</strong> under migration trio (SfU22 + 235 + 229) — Pehrson must defend liberal brand vs SD-driven tightening</td><td>SfU committee record; L party programme</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--opportunities">🔵 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">🔵 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4228,7 +4228,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--opportunities">🔵 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>O1</strong></td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneurship dividend</strong> from Ukraine tribunal — Sweden as Nordic accountability leader</td><td>HD03231; CoE framework</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O2</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition-stability narrative</strong> if fiscal package executes without further close votes through Q2/Q3</td><td>Voteringsregister; macro indicators</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O3</strong></td><td><strong>Cross-party constitutional statesmanship</strong> if S endorses Norway-style statutory triggers in KU33 second reading</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> §Nordic models</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O4</strong></td><td><strong>Energy modernisation legacy</strong> — Electricity System Act (HD03240) + wind power (HD03239) lay foundation for 2030 100 % renewable target</td><td>HD03240; HD03239</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O5</strong></td><td><strong>Anti-money-laundering positioning</strong> via housing reforms (HD01CU27 + HD01CU28) — international financial-integrity signalling</td><td>HD01CU27; HD01CU28; AMLD6</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O6</strong></td><td><strong>Re-election platform consolidation</strong> — fiscal + brott + ordning + försvar legislative blocks form coherent campaign architecture</td><td>HD03100; HD03246; HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4290,7 +4290,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid retaliation</strong> post-tribunal + NATO eFP — cyber, sabotage, disinformation, infrastructure harassment</td><td>SÄPO 2024 assessment; Baltic cable pattern; Finnish border instrumentalisation 2023–24</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> — interpretive-frontier risk on "formellt tillförd bevisning"; chilling effect on investigative journalism</td><td>HD01KU33 betänkande; press-freedom NGO joint statement</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Migration trio ECHR strike-down</strong> — V/C/MP counter-motion text shows coordinated Strasbourg-litigation predicate</td><td>SfU22 + counter-motions; ECHR Article 8 + 13</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition fracture under SD pressure</strong> — 145-142 = SD as kingmaker on every paragraph; future close votes risky</td><td>JuU15 protokoll; SD parliamentary leverage</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>US tribunal non-cooperation</strong> — undermines tribunal effectiveness and Swedish founding-member credibility</td><td>Public statements; ICC US history</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Climate-credibility erosion</strong> — fuel-tax cut + activity-coupled forestry rules (HD03242) undermine green brand</td><td>HD03236; HD03242; Klimatpolitiska rådet</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>Q3 2026 macro shock</strong> — fiscal stimulus fails to translate to measurable growth/employment improvement</td><td>KI prognos 2026-Q1; macro lag-time analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Lantmäteriet IT delivery slip</strong> — bostadsregister (HD01CU28) Jan 2027 deadline at risk; political cost of delivery failure</td><td>Lantmäteriet capacity assessment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix">🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix">🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Doctrine</strong> (per <code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0): cross-quadrant interactions surface strategic centres of gravity that vanilla SWOT misses.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -4362,8 +4362,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-cross-quadrant-interference-matrix">🔁 TOWS Cross-Quadrant In
 <li><strong>Russian-hybrid response capacity</strong> (S4 × T1; O1 × T1) — security variable</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives">🌈 Stakeholder SWOT — 6 Distinct Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson">🟦 S — Socialdemokraterna (Magdalena Andersson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives">🌈 Stakeholder SWOT — 6 Distinct Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-swot--6-distinct-perspectives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson">🟦 S — Socialdemokraterna (Magdalena Andersson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4395,7 +4395,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--s--socialdemokraterna-magdalena-andersson">🟦 S — Socialdemokrat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living + Nordic-GDP-gap critique armed with World Bank data</td><td>Counter-budget can frame fiscal-stewardship failure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Internal split on KU33 (gäng-agenda alignment vs press-freedom tradition)</td><td>Andersson personal position is decisive variable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Ukraine consensus participation = statesmanship credit; possible KU33 cross-party negotiation</td><td>Both available without giving up core identity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If KU33 second-reading strategy mishandled, alienates V/MP coalition partners post-Sep</td><td>Tactical care required</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar">🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Nooshi Dadgostar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar">🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Nooshi Dadgostar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4427,7 +4427,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--v--vänsterpartiet-nooshi-dadgostar">🟥 V — Vänsterpartiet (Noo
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Clear ideological position against migration trio + KU33 + fiscal package</td><td>Mobilises base efficiently</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Limited coalition leverage; voter ceiling ~9-10 %</td><td>Dependent on S to operationalise positions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33 (FRA-lagen 2008 precedent suggests 0.5-1.5 pp)</td><td>Single-issue framing possible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Russia's tribunal-retaliation narrative could divide V (anti-NATO faction vs accountability faction)</td><td>Internal management challenge</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok">🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharrem Demirok)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok">🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharrem Demirok)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--c--centerpartiet-muharrem-demirok">🟢 C — Centerpartiet (Muharre
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Migration-counter-motion authority (rural / liberal voter coalition); fiscal alternatives credibility</td><td>Strategic position between blocs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Stuck below 5 % parliamentary threshold in some polls; existential risk</td><td>Must differentiate vs both blocs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>KU33 cross-party leverage (could broker stricter language in second reading)</td><td>Statesmanship moment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If migration counter-motion fails Strasbourg, brand damaged</td><td>Litigation-risk exposure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson">🟠 SD — Sverigedemokraterna (Jimmie Åkesson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson">🟠 SD — Sverigedemokraterna (Jimmie Åkesson)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4491,7 +4491,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--sd--sverigedemokraterna-jimmie-åkesson">🟠 SD — Sverigedemokrat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Migration trio = direct policy delivery for SD-base; JuU15 145-142 confirms kingmaker leverage</td><td>Tidö-deal cashing in</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>No formal cabinet seats = limited credit-claiming on broad agenda</td><td>Wants more visible policy ownership</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Further coalition leverage on next contentious vote; potentially Cabinet entry post-Sep</td><td>Strategic patience</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If Russian hybrid escalation ⇒ campaign reframes to security ⇒ SD's traditional issue ownership questioned</td><td>Brand vulnerability</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén">🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel Helldén)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén">🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel Helldén)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4523,7 +4523,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--mp--miljöpartiet-daniel-helldén">🟢 MP — Miljöpartiet (Daniel
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Unique green-credibility; KU33 + migration trio both align with MP identity</td><td>Voter-attentive items</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Bloc dependency on S; ceiling ~6-7 %; no cabinet in 4 years</td><td>Operational constraints</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Electricity System Act + wind-power municipal share offer climate-policy gains MP can claim</td><td>Constructive engagement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Russian hybrid-event reshapes campaign agenda away from climate</td><td>External shock risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--civil-society--general-public">👥 Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--civil-society--general-public"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society--general-public">👥 Civil Society / General Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society--general-public"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4556,7 +4556,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--civil-society--general-public">👥 Civil Society / General Public<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Top Item</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Broad-based access to relief (fuel + el/gas + welfare); Ukrainian solidarity high; NATO membership consensus</td><td>Public legitimacy strong</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living pain real (8.7 % unemp); regional inequality (sydöstra Skåne, HD11718); domestic-violence services strain (HD10438)</td><td>Distributional concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Bostadsregister + AML housing reforms could improve market integrity</td><td>Welfare-state modernisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>KU33 chilling effect could reduce investigative journalism; Russian hybrid could disrupt critical infrastructure</td><td>Institutional resilience risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid">🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid">🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOV["🟦 Government&#x3C;br/>M + KD + L&#x3C;br/>(151 seats)"]
     SD["🟠 SD&#x3C;br/>parliamentary support&#x3C;br/>(73 seats)"]
@@ -4627,7 +4627,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-bloc-alliance-map-mermaid">🔁 Cross-Bloc Alliance Map (Merma
     style BUDGET fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style ENERGY fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rules 5–6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory under Rules 5–6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4665,7 +4665,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-under-rules-56">🗳️ Elec
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication for Government Coalition</th><th>Implication for Opposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy + JuU15 + NATO eFP form coherent campaign block; KU33 a manageable secondary risk</td><td>S best-positioned to capture cost-of-living; V/MP attentive-voter mobilisation on KU33; C-survival depends on differentiation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>Continuity (P=0.50) preserves agenda; close-vote risk persists</td><td>S-led minority (P=0.35) plausible; S+V+MP (P=0.15) blocks KU33 second reading</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living + brott + ordning + försvar = government's selling deck</td><td>Climate + welfare + civil rights = opposition's deck</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Nordic-GDP gap + climate self-contradiction + cross-cluster tension</td><td>Universal-Ukraine consensus precludes effective opposition there</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>Fiscal annual + JuU15 4-year + KU33 decadal + NATO eFP strategic</td><td>Counter-motions establish opposition record but no immediate policy legacy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Top-5 Findings + §TOWS Cross-Cluster Interference</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1 + §R3 trace from T1 + T3 above</li>
@@ -4676,7 +4676,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0 (TOWS + cross-bloc + scenario-branching)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4708,7 +4708,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>THR-ID</strong></td><td>THR-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0 (STRIDE · Attack Tree · Cyber Kill Chain · Diamond Model · Political Threat Taxonomy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat Inventory</strong></td><td>3 priority vectors decomposed multi-framework + 4 watch-list</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-priority-threat-vectors">🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-priority-threat-vectors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-priority-threat-vectors">🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-priority-threat-vectors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4744,8 +4744,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-priority-threat-vectors">🎯 Three Priority Threat Vectors<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Vector</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Frameworks Applied</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid retaliation</strong> post-tribunal (HD03231) + NATO eFP (HD01UFöU3)</td><td align="center">🔴 CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>STRIDE + Cyber Kill Chain + Diamond Model</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Constitutional accountability gap</strong> — KU33 narrowing + opposition rhetorical exposure</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Attack Tree + Political Threat Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Migration-trio ECHR challenge</strong> — V/C/MP coordinated litigation against SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Attack Tree + STRIDE on legal-process integrity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation">🧨 T1 — Russian Hybrid Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-stride-decomposition">STRIDE Decomposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-decomposition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation">🧨 T1 — Russian Hybrid Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--russian-hybrid-retaliation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stride-decomposition">STRIDE Decomposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-decomposition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4794,7 +4794,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stride-decomposition">STRIDE Decomposition<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Letter</th><th>Threat Class</th><th>Manifestation in T1</th><th align="center">Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong></td><td>Spoofing</td><td>Disinformation impersonating Swedish government, parties, journalists — election-disinformation campaigns</td><td align="center">🔴</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong></td><td>Tampering</td><td>Cyber-intrusion of public-sector + critical-infrastructure systems (energy, water, hospitals)</td><td align="center">🔴</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong></td><td>Repudiation</td><td>Plausibly-deniable proxy operations (e.g. via third-country actors); attribution lag</td><td align="center">🟠</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong></td><td>Info Disclosure</td><td>Leak of classified materials to embarrass government or foment internal division</td><td align="center">🟠</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong></td><td>DoS</td><td>DDoS attacks on Riksdag, Försvarsmakten, Valmyndigheten, energy grid</td><td align="center">🟠</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong></td><td>Elevation of Privilege</td><td>Compromise of Försvarsmakten / SÄPO operational systems via supply-chain or credential attacks</td><td align="center">🔴</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL["🎯 Adversary Goal:&#x3C;br/>Degrade Swedish capacity&#x3C;br/>to support Ukraine + advance NATO eFP"]
     
@@ -4845,7 +4845,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     style L2C1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style L2D1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style L2B1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant">Cyber Kill Chain (Election-Disinformation Variant)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant">Cyber Kill Chain (Election-Disinformation Variant)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4892,7 +4892,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-election-disinformation-variant">Cyber Kill Chain (E
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Manifestation</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Reconnaissance</td><td>Map Swedish political fault-lines (KU33 press-freedom, fuel-tax cut climate tension, migration trio)</td><td>OSINT defensive monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>2. Weaponisation</td><td>Build deep-fake content; create amplification networks</td><td>MSB / SÄPO offensive intel</td></tr><tr><td>3. Delivery</td><td>Social media + alternative-media seeding</td><td>Platform partnerships</td></tr><tr><td>4. Exploitation</td><td>Trigger campaign narrative shift away from Sweden's chosen frames</td><td>Media-literacy programmes</td></tr><tr><td>5. Installation</td><td>Establish persistent disinformation channels</td><td>Platform takedowns</td></tr><tr><td>6. Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Coordinate amplification waves with offline events</td><td>Intel-sharing with Nordic-Baltic partners</td></tr><tr><td>7. Actions on Objectives</td><td>Reduce coalition margins; suppress voter turnout in critical demographics</td><td>Civil-society resilience programmes</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-diamond-model">Diamond Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diamond-model">Diamond Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4919,7 +4919,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-diamond-model">Diamond Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Vertex</th><th>Identification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Adversary</strong></td><td>GRU Unit 26165 (cyber); FSB (HUMINT + influence); Internet Research Agency successors (disinformation); proxy actors (RT, Sputnik successors)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Capability</strong></td><td>Established cyber-offensive (NotPetya 2017, SolarWinds 2020, Viasat 2022); industrial-scale disinformation; demonstrated infrastructure-sabotage capacity (Nord Stream pipelines 2022 contested)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Infrastructure</strong></td><td>C2 servers in third countries; social-media bot networks; insider-threat recruiters in diaspora communities</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Victim</strong></td><td>Swedish public sector + critical infrastructure + election integrity + civil-society confidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-mitigation-status">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mitigation-status">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4974,7 +4974,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-mitigation-status">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Mitigation</th><th>Owner</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SÄPO threat-actor monitoring</td><td>SÄPO</td><td align="center">🟢 Active (heightened)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>MSB civil-defence preparedness</td><td>MSB</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Critical-infrastructure hardening (NIS2)</td><td>Sektorsmyndigheter</td><td align="center">🟡 Implementation phase</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Election-infrastructure security</td><td>Valmyndigheten + SÄPO</td><td align="center">🟡 Pre-2026 hardening</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic-Baltic intel sharing</td><td>NORDEFCO + NIC</td><td align="center">🟢 Operational</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-society resilience programmes</td><td>MSB + Civil Defence Agency</td><td align="center">🟡 Underway</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Public information campaign (resilience)</td><td>MSB</td><td align="center">🟡 Planned for 2026</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-source-attribution">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-source-attribution">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SÄPO Annual Open Threat Assessment 2024</li>
 <li>Försvarsmakten MUST quarterly briefings (open elements)</li>
@@ -4983,8 +4983,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-source-attribution">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>Hybrid CoE (Helsinki) — Russian sub-conventional operations dataset</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing">🧨 T2 — Constitutional Accountability Gap (KU33 Narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion">Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing">🧨 T2 — Constitutional Accountability Gap (KU33 Narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--constitutional-accountability-gap-ku33-narrowing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion">Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL2["🎯 Threat Goal:&#x3C;br/>Reduce investigative-journalism capacity&#x3C;br/>over Swedish public sector"]
     
@@ -5033,7 +5033,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-attack-tree-press-freedom-erosion">Attack Tree (Press-Freedom Erosion
     style A3 fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style A1_1 fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style A4_3 fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5065,7 +5065,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Political Threat Taxonomy Mapping<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Taxonomy Class</th><th align="center">Match</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Democratic-process integrity</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Press-freedom infrastructure compromise</td></tr><tr><td>Rule-of-law durability</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Grundlag narrowing without complete second-reading certainty</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-liberties baseline</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Investigative-journalism precondition</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-process security</td><td align="center">🟨 partial</td><td>Indirect via campaign rhetoric reframing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-1">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mitigation-status-1">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5102,7 +5102,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-1">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Mitigation</th><th>Owner</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet engagement</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom NGO coordination</td><td>SJF / TU / Utgivarna</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Statutory clarity in 2nd-reading amendment</td><td>KU + Justitiedepartementet</td><td align="center">🟡 Pending</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>International benchmark adoption (Norway-style triggers)</td><td>KU</td><td align="center">🟡 Available, not adopted</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-source-attribution-1">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-source-attribution-1">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>KU committee record HD01KU33</li>
 <li>Press-freedom NGO joint statement 2026-Q2 (forthcoming)</li>
@@ -5110,8 +5110,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-source-attribution-1">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>BVerfG Staatstrojaner ruling (1 BvR 2664/17, 2019) for comparative reasoning</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge">🧨 T3 — Migration-Trio ECHR Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate">Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge">🧨 T3 — Migration-Trio ECHR Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--migration-trio-echr-challenge"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate">Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL3["🎯 Counter-Goal:&#x3C;br/>Reverse SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229&#x3C;br/>via Strasbourg ruling"]
 
@@ -5141,7 +5141,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-attack-tree-litigation-predicate">Attack Tree (Litigation Predicate)<
     style P5a fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style P5b fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style P5c fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity">STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity">STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5183,7 +5183,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stride-on-legal-process-integrity">STRIDE on Legal-Process Integrity<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Letter</th><th>Concern</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong> (Spoofing)</td><td>Misrepresentation of UNHCR or ECHR positions in domestic debate</td><td>Verbatim citation discipline</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong> (Tampering)</td><td>Procedural irregularities in inhibition-order issuance</td><td>JO + Justitiekanslern oversight</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong> (Repudiation)</td><td>Government denial of practice patterns</td><td>SfU + Regeringsförhör accountability</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong> (Info Disclosure)</td><td>Unauthorised release of asylum-seeker case data</td><td>DPO oversight per GDPR</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong> (DoS)</td><td>Court backlog in admissibility processing</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen capacity</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong> (Elev. Privilege)</td><td>Police authority over inhibition orders without judicial pre-review</td><td>Judicial-review compatibility text</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-2">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mitigation-status-2">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-status-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5215,7 +5215,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-mitigation-status-2">Mitigation Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Mitigation</th><th>Owner</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government legal review</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td></tr><tr><td>Appeal-mechanism build-out</td><td>Justitiedepartementet + SfU</td><td align="center">🟡 Considered</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial-review compatibility text</td><td>KU + Lagrådet</td><td align="center">🟡 Pending</td></tr><tr><td>UNHCR consultation discipline</td><td>UD</td><td align="center">🟢 Active</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-source-attribution-2">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-source-attribution-2">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-attribution-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SfU22 betänkande</li>
 <li>V + C + MP counter-motion text</li>
@@ -5224,7 +5224,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-source-attribution-2">Source Attribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>UNHCR Sweden country report</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--watch-list-threats-periodic-review">🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodic Review)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--watch-list-threats-periodic-review"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-watch-list-threats-periodic-review">🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodic Review)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-watch-list-threats-periodic-review"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5262,7 +5262,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--watch-list-threats-periodic-review">🚨 Watch-List Threats (Periodi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Likelihood (now)</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T4</strong></td><td>Coalition fracture leading to election trigger</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Monitor close votes; SD-relations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T5</strong></td><td>US public non-cooperation on Ukraine tribunal</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">UD bilateral track</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T6</strong></td><td>Climate-credibility erosion enabling MP/V attentive-voter mobilisation</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">Communications strategy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T7</strong></td><td>Lantmäteriet IT-delivery failure on bostadsregister</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Procurement-portal monitoring</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5294,7 +5294,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>T1 (Russian hybrid) most likely to reshape campaign agenda if event materialises; T2 (KU33) requires triggering case to register publicly; T3 (ECHR) damages government legal credibility if struck down pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>T1 event ⇒ security-frame consensus expands ⇒ government continuity probability ↑; T3 strike-down ⇒ S-led minority more plausible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>T1 = top-tier salience if event; T2 = low unless catalysed; T3 = medium if Strasbourg ruling pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Government vs T1 (preparedness narrative) + T3 (legal arrogance critique); Opposition vs T2 (constitutional craftsmanship critique) + T6 (climate critique)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>T1 mitigation = decadal security-architecture investment; T2 = decadal grundlag durability; T3 = ECHR jurisprudence shapes future migration-policy boundaries</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1 + §R2 + §R3 = same threats viewed as risk register</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §Wildcards = T1 + T3 escalation paths (W1 → T1 Russian hybrid; W2 → T3 ECHR strike-down)</li>
@@ -5304,7 +5304,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven; immediate update if T1 trigger fires) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0 (STRIDE + Attack Tree + Kill Chain + Diamond + Political Threat Taxonomy)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5340,13 +5340,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>Week 16, 2026 (2026-04-11 → 2026-04-17)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (Comparative Benchmarking) + Nordic + EU baseline references</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jurisdictions</strong></td><td>6 — Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, United Kingdom (+ Ireland, Estonia for migration / digital cluster)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Sources</strong></td><td>World Bank (<code>economic-data.json</code>); RSF Press Freedom Index 2025; OECD; Eurostat; national parliament sources</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>A reference-grade analysis must <strong>benchmark against ≥ 5 jurisdictions</strong> so that Swedish developments are interpreted in context, not in isolation. This file places Week 16's six clusters against Nordic + EU peers, and identifies where Sweden <em>innovates</em>, where it <em>follows</em>, and where it <em>diverges</em>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5403,7 +5403,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2024</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2023</th><th align="center">Unemployment 2025</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.82 %</strong></td><td align="center">−0.20 %</td><td align="center"><strong>8.69 %</strong></td><td>Lowest Nordic GDP; unemployment at 5-year high</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">3.48 %</td><td align="center">2.50 %</td><td align="center">~5.6 %</td><td>Highest Nordic GDP — pharma/Novo Nordisk effect</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">2.10 %</td><td align="center">0.50 %</td><td align="center">~3.8 %</td><td>Stable; sovereign-wealth buffer</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">0.42 %</td><td align="center">−0.96 %</td><td align="center">~8.4 %</td><td>Sweden-comparable trajectory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany (EU benchmark)</strong></td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">~3.0 %</td><td>EU sluggish; Mittelstand challenges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">~0.9 %</td><td align="center">0.1 %</td><td align="center">~4.4 %</td><td>Comparable to Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden's 0.82 % growth in 2024 — vs Denmark's 3.48 % — is the <strong>single largest empirical vulnerability</strong> in the government's economic-stewardship narrative. Finland tracks similarly poorly. The fiscal trilogy is a stimulus response to a structural underperformance gap.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison">Fiscal Stance Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison">Fiscal Stance Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5442,8 +5442,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison">Fiscal Stance Comparison<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 Fiscal Stance</th><th align="center">Comparable to HD03236?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Mild stimulus (vårproposition + extra ändringsbudget; fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief + försvarsanslag)</td><td align="center">Reference</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Restrictive (surplus discipline; carbon fee retained; defence ↑)</td><td align="center">Sweden has <em>less</em> restrictive stance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Moderate (oil-fund withdrawal at structural rate; carbon-fee adjusted)</td><td align="center">Norway's carbon-fee discipline contrasts Sweden's fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Cautious-restrictive (debt-brake compatible)</td><td align="center">Sweden uses more political fiscal space</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Cautious; Schuldenbremse constraint</td><td align="center">Sweden has more fiscal flexibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Among Nordic peers, Denmark + Norway retain <strong>carbon-pricing discipline</strong> even while supporting cost-of-living relief through other instruments. Sweden's fuel-tax-cut approach is a Nordic outlier. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025">Press-Freedom Baseline (RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025">Press-Freedom Baseline (RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5497,7 +5497,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-press-freedom-baseline-rsf-world-press-freedom-index-2025">Press-Free
 <li><strong>Sweden uniquely uses constitutional (grundlag) status</strong> for press-freedom architecture; KU33 is a <strong>constitutional</strong> change, not statutory. Norway and Denmark have more flexibility because their architecture is statutory.</li>
 <li>The <strong>interpretive variable "formellt tillförd bevisning"</strong> has no direct Nordic peer term — its definition strictness is the primary determinant of post-KU33 press-freedom outcomes.</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context">EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context">EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5536,7 +5536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-accessibility-act-ku32-context">EU Accessibility Act (KU32) Contex
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>EAA Implementation Status</th><th>Constitutional or Statutory?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>KU32 = <strong>constitutional grundlag entrenchment</strong></td><td>Constitutional</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>BFSG 2022 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Ordonnance 2023-839 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Wet toegankelijkheid 2022 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>EAA 2023 — statutory</td><td>Statutory</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden is the <strong>only EU jurisdiction implementing EAA at constitutional grundlag level</strong> — uniquely strong rights protection but creates path-dependence for amendments. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context">⚖️ C3 — Criminal Justice (JuU15) in Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context">⚖️ C3 — Criminal Justice (JuU15) in Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5575,8 +5575,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-c3--criminal-justice-juu15-in-nordic-context">⚖️ C3 — Crimi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Juvenile-offender age threshold</th><th align="center">Remand max</th><th>Recent tightening</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">15 (criminal responsibility); JuU15 extends remand + earlier responsibility assessment</td><td align="center">Extended via JuU15</td><td>🟢 2026 (Tidö centerpiece)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">15; lowered by 2010 reform from 14 + reverted in 2012</td><td align="center">Standard</td><td>Recent tightening 2018+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">15; emphasis on rehab</td><td align="center">Standard</td><td>Limited change</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">15; rehabilitation-focus</td><td align="center">Standard</td><td>Stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden's juvenile-offender tightening tracks Denmark + UK trends; Norway + Finland retain rehabilitation focus. The JuU15 145-142 vote suggests significant cross-Nordic divergence is now established. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp">🌍 C4 — Ukraine Accountability + NATO eFP<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232">Tribunal Architecture Participation (HD03231 / HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp">🌍 C4 — Ukraine Accountability + NATO eFP<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c4--ukraine-accountability--nato-efp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232">Tribunal Architecture Participation (HD03231 / HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5639,7 +5639,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tribunal-architecture-participation-hd03231--hd03232">Tribunal Archit
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Founding member of Special Tribunal?</th><th align="center">Damages Commission member?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">✅ (HD03231)</td><td align="center">✅ (HD03232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">✅ (non-EU)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (ambiguous — concerns over reciprocity)</td><td align="center">Partial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (target state)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td><strong>China</strong></td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Tribunal has <strong>broad European participation</strong> but key great-power gaps. Sweden's founding-member status places it squarely in the Nordic + EU consensus; risk R6 (effectiveness without US) is <strong>shared with all participants</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions">NATO eFP (Enhanced Forward Presence) Country Contributions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions">NATO eFP (Enhanced Forward Presence) Country Contributions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5703,8 +5703,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-nato-efp-enhanced-forward-presence-country-contributions">NATO eFP (E
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>eFP Battle Group Participation</th><th align="center">Operational Year of Maturity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td>Lead nation Poland; multiple BG contributions</td><td align="center">2017+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United Kingdom</strong></td><td>Lead nation Estonia</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Lead nation Latvia</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Lead nation Lithuania; <strong>Slovakia 2024+</strong></td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Lead nation Romania (2022); contributions Estonia</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Italy</strong></td><td>Lead nation Bulgaria (2022)</td><td align="center">2022</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Major contributor Lithuania</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>NATO since April 2023; recipient + contributor</td><td align="center">2024+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Contributor multiple BGs</td><td align="center">2017+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>NATO since March 2024; <strong>eFP Finland 1,200 troops 2026-Q3 (HD01UFöU3)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>2026</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden is among the <strong>last NATO members to operationalise</strong> post-accession (March 2024 → Q3 2026 ≈ 30-month accession-to-operations cycle, comparable to Finland's 2023→2024 cycle of ≈14 months). Faster Finnish operationalisation reflects geographic urgency vs Sweden's strategic-depth role.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context">🛂 C5 — Migration / Rights Tightening in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue">Inhibition-Order Equivalents (SfU22 analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context">🛂 C5 — Migration / Rights Tightening in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c5--migration--rights-tightening-in-eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue">Inhibition-Order Equivalents (SfU22 analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5749,8 +5749,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-inhibition-order-equivalents-sfu22-analogue">Inhibition-Order Equival
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Inhibition-order regime</th><th align="center">Appeal mechanism</th><th align="center">ECHR challenges</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>HD01SfU22 — new regime; appeal mechanism contested</td><td align="center">🟡 Limited</td><td align="center">V/C/MP-prepared</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Similar (Udlændingelov § 32 + 36); strong appeal mechanism</td><td align="center">🟢 Yes</td><td align="center">Some past challenges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>UK Borders Act 2007 — extensive inhibition orders</td><td align="center">🟡 Limited</td><td align="center">Multiple ECHR cases (NA v UK 2008+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Aufenthaltsgesetz — moderately strong</td><td align="center">🟢 Yes</td><td align="center">BVerwG precedents</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Vw 2000 — moderate</td><td align="center">🟢 Yes</td><td align="center">Limited ECHR challenges</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's HD01SfU22 + Prop 235/229 push Swedish migration policy toward UK + Danish models. The <strong>appeal-mechanism gap is the primary ECHR-vulnerability variable</strong>. Adding judicial-review compatibility would significantly reduce R3 / W2 magnitude.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context">⚡ C6 — Energy + Housing + Sector Reforms in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240">Electricity-System Reform (HD03240)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context">⚡ C6 — Energy + Housing + Sector Reforms in EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c6--energy--housing--sector-reforms-in-eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240">Electricity-System Reform (HD03240)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5788,7 +5788,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-electricity-system-reform-hd03240">Electricity-System Reform (HD03240
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Recent comprehensive Electricity Act?</th><th align="center">Smart-grid integration</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">HD03240 — comprehensive rewrite 2026</td><td align="center">Smart-grid + storage + prosumer rights</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">EnWG amendments ongoing</td><td align="center">Smart-grid significant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">Continuous statutory updates</td><td align="center">Strong wind-integration</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">Statlig regulering Energiloven</td><td align="center">Hydro-dominant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">Sähkömarkkinalaki 2013 + revisions</td><td align="center">Continuous</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden's HD03240 places Swedish electricity legislation on par with German + Danish modernisation; the legislative-coherence step is overdue. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative">Bostadsregister (HD01CU28) — AML Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative">Bostadsregister (HD01CU28) — AML Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5827,8 +5827,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-bostadsregister-hd01cu28--aml-comparative">Bostadsregister (HD01CU28)
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Comprehensive housing register</th><th align="center">AML coverage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">HD01CU28 — Jan 2027 target</td><td align="center"><strong>First time</strong> for bostadsrätter</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">Tinglysning + ejendomsregister</td><td align="center">Long-established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">Land Registry + Companies House BO register</td><td align="center">Strong AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">Kadaster + UBO register</td><td align="center">Strong AML</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estonia</strong></td><td align="center">Kinnistusraamat</td><td align="center">Digital-first</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden is <strong>catching up</strong> on bostadsrätter visibility. The Lantmäteriet IT-delivery dependency (R7) determines actual implementation. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1">🛡️ Russian Hybrid Response Comparative (calibrating R1 / T1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents">Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid Incidents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1">🛡️ Russian Hybrid Response Comparative (calibrating R1 / T1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-russian-hybrid-response-comparative-calibrating-r1--t1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents">Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid Incidents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5873,7 +5873,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-recent-nordic--baltic-hybrid-incidents">Recent Nordic / Baltic Hybrid
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Incident</th><th align="center">Year</th><th>Sweden-relevant lesson</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Border instrumentalisation (asylum seekers driven to crossings)</td><td align="center">2023–24</td><td>Sweden could face similar via Finnmark</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estonia</strong></td><td>Multiple cyber attacks; border tension</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Election-disinformation precedent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lithuania</strong></td><td>Belarus-coordinated border pressure</td><td align="center">2021–24</td><td>Cross-border coordination capacity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Grindavik gas-pipeline + cable surveillance</td><td align="center">2022–25</td><td>Critical-infrastructure exposure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Baltic-cable incidents (e.g. Hong Kong-flagged ship 2024)</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Nordic-wide pattern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong>: Sweden faces a <strong>Nordic-Baltic baseline pattern</strong> of hybrid pressure. R1 magnitude calibration places Sweden <strong>above Norway</strong> (less direct exposure) and <strong>comparable to Finland</strong> (similar vulnerability to instrumentalisation + cyber). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5905,7 +5905,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Comparative Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Sweden's economic-stewardship narrative challenged by Nordic-GDP-gap data; Denmark's success is rhetorical reference for opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>S-led coalition structure resembles current Danish + Norwegian models; mid-2020s Norden trend</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living + climate salience in Sweden tracks Finland; differs from Denmark (where climate-policy is more consensual)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Sweden's outlier status on fuel-tax-cut (vs DK + NO carbon-pricing discipline) is opposition-exploitable in cross-Nordic comparison</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>KU33 places Sweden on Nordic baseline; implementation-strictness (formellt tillförd bevisning) determines whether Sweden remains a press-freedom leader</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines">📊 Summary Table — Sweden's Position vs Nordic + EU Baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines">📊 Summary Table — Sweden's Position vs Nordic + EU Baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5979,7 +5979,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--summary-table--swedens-position-vs-nordic--eu-baselines">📊 Summar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden vs Nordic peers</th><th>Sweden vs EU baselines</th><th align="center">Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP growth 2024</td><td><strong>Below DK + NO; comparable to FI</strong></td><td>Comparable to UK + DE</td><td align="center">🔴 Underperforms</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom architecture</td><td><strong>Stricter (constitutional)</strong></td><td>Stricter</td><td align="center">🟢 Leader</td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom outcome (RSF)</td><td>Among top-5</td><td>Top quintile</td><td align="center">🟢 Leader</td></tr><tr><td>Juvenile-offender tightening</td><td>Tracks DK trend</td><td>Tracks UK trend</td><td align="center">🟡 Following</td></tr><tr><td>Migration tightening</td><td>Tracks DK + UK</td><td>Tracks general EU restrictiveness 2024+</td><td align="center">🟡 Following</td></tr><tr><td>Electricity-system reform</td><td>Tracks DE + DK</td><td>Tracks EU baseline</td><td align="center">🟡 Catching up</td></tr><tr><td>Bostadsrätter AML coverage</td><td>Behind DK + Estonia</td><td>Behind UK</td><td align="center">🟡 Catching up</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP operationalisation</td><td>Behind FI; comparable to other late accession</td><td>Behind US/UK</td><td align="center">🟡 Following</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal participation</td><td>Founding member among Nordic + EU</td><td>Founding member among 30+ jurisdictions</td><td align="center">🟢 Leader</td></tr><tr><td>Carbon-pricing discipline</td><td><strong>Below DK + NO</strong> (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>Below EU baseline</td><td align="center">🔴 Outlier-down</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1 calibration uses Nordic/Baltic precedents</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §W1 wildcard derives from Finland 2023–24 instrumentalised migration</li>
@@ -5990,7 +5990,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (Comparative Benchmarking) + World Bank + RSF + national parliament references</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6022,7 +6022,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 (CIA triad + sensitivity tier + domain taxonomy + urgency matrix)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Classified</strong></td><td>28 (23 weekly significant + 5 supplementary)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6055,7 +6055,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classif
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Definition</th><th>Documents This Week</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🔴 P0 — Constitutional / Critical</strong></td><td>Grundlag amendments; democratic-infrastructure changes; reversal window decadal</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟠 P1 — Strategic National</strong></td><td>Foreign-policy treaty accession; major fiscal commitments; criminal-justice frame; security operations</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03231, HD03232, HD03246, HD01SfU22, HD01UFöU3, Prop 235, Prop 229</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟡 P2 — Sector / Regulated</strong></td><td>Energy, housing, accessibility, sector-specific reforms</td><td>HD03240, HD03245, HD03237, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD03244, HD03242, HD03239, HD03233</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟢 P3 — Routine / Administrative</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen reports, motions, EU directive transposition, interpellations</td><td>HD024098, HD01CU22, HD01CU42, HD10437, HD10438, HD11718, HD11719</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Where CIA = <strong>C</strong>onfidentiality (information protection / institutional secrecy), <strong>I</strong>ntegrity (rule-of-law durability + transparency), <strong>A</strong>vailability (citizen access to rights / services). Scored ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -6255,7 +6255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Confidentiality</th><th align="center">Integrity</th><th align="center">Availability</th><th align="center">Net Democratic Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (raises confidentiality of police-seized digital material)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (narrows transparency / "allmän handling")</td><td align="center">🟧 M (citizens lose insight into investigations)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on transparency</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M (no change)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rights-positive — accessibility entrenched in grundlag)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (citizens with disabilities gain access)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>Net positive on rights</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 (Vårproposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (fiscal accountability framework intact)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (welfare delivery + relief)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399 / HD03236</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (fuel + el/gas relief)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (JuU15)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (juvenile-data confidentiality concerns from longer remand)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (extends carceral state vs rehab)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (police investigative capacity ↑; juvenile rights ↓)</td><td align="center">🟧 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 (Tribunal)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rule-of-law + accountability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (no direct citizen impact)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 (Damages Comm.)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (reparations rule-of-law architecture)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22 (Inhibition)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces appeal mechanism)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (asylum-seeker access ↓)</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative on rights (ECHR risk)</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235 (Deportation)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces procedural protection)</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative on rights</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229 (Reception law)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (eligibility narrowed)</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3 (NATO eFP)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (military operational secrecy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (NATO Article 5 credibility)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (förändrar säkerhetsläget)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (Electricity Sys)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (legal coherence ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (smart-grid investment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239 (Wind power municipal)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H (municipal revenue + climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245 (Strategy violence)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (victim privacy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H (services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237 (Police training)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (recruitment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (police capacity)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27 (Lagfart + AML)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (data integrity)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (AML enforcement ↑)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (consumer protection ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 (Bostadsregister)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (register data)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (market integrity ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (bostadsrätter buyers)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244 (Interoperability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (cross-agency services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242 (Forestry)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Mixed (climate trade-off)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233 (Anti-fraud)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (consumer protection)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098 (Counter-budget motion)</td><td align="center">🟢 —</td><td align="center">🟢 —</td><td align="center">🟢 —</td><td align="center">Procedural</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU22 / HD01CU42</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (Riksrevisionen oversight)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437 (Lönetransparens)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438 (Kvinnojourer)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (services at risk)</td><td align="center">🟥 Concern</td></tr><tr><td>HD11718 (Statlig närvaro Skåne)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Procedural</td></tr><tr><td>HD11719 (Skattekrav prostitution)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟥 L (victim re-victimisation risk)</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟥 Net negative for victims</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--domain-distribution">🌐 Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--domain-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-distribution">🌐 Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Documents by Policy Domain — Week 16
     "Constitutional / Democratic Infrastructure" : 2
     "Fiscal / Economic" : 4
@@ -6268,7 +6268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--domain-distribution">🌐 Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden
     "Digital / Telecom" : 2
     "Other" : 2</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-pre-election-significance-distribution">🎚️ Pre-Election Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-pre-election-significance-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-election-significance-distribution">🎚️ Pre-Election Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-significance-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6306,7 +6306,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-pre-election-significance-distribution">🎚️ Pre-Election Sign
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Salience to Sep 2026 Election</th><th>Documents</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03246, HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">5</td></tr><tr><td>🟩 <strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD03231, HD01SfU22, Prop 235, Prop 229, HD03245</td><td align="center">7</td></tr><tr><td>🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>HD03232, HD03240, HD03237, HD03239, HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>🟥 <strong>LOW</strong></td><td>HD03244, HD03242, HD03233, HD024098, HD01CU22, HD01CU42, HD10437, HD11718</td><td align="center">8</td></tr><tr><td>⬛ <strong>VERY LOW</strong></td><td>HD10438, HD11719 (procedural relevance)</td><td align="center">2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-urgency-matrix">⏱️ Urgency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-urgency-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-urgency-matrix">⏱️ Urgency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6339,7 +6339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-urgency-matrix">⏱️ Urgency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision Horizon</th><th>Documents</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Immediate (≤ 7 days)</strong></td><td>HD03236 chamber vote 2026-04-22; KU annual hearings 2026-04-27</td><td>Live monitoring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Near (30 days)</strong></td><td>Lagrådet KU32/KU33 yttrande Q2; chamber votes on KU and Ukraine</td><td>Track for editorial follow-up</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Medium (90 days)</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Q3 deployment; budget execution data</td><td>Forward-watch list</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Long (1+ years)</strong></td><td>KU33 second reading; ECHR ruling; tribunal first case</td><td>Post-election briefings</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-rationale">🔐 Classification Rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-rationale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-rationale">🔐 Classification Rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-rationale"></a></h3>
 <p>All 28 documents classified <strong>Public</strong> under <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md"><code>Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION.md</code></a>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents already published by Riksdagen / Regeringskansliet</li>
@@ -6350,7 +6350,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-rationale">🔐 Classification Rationale<a class="" a
 <p><strong>Classification Internal would apply to</strong> (none in this run): pre-disclosure embargoed material, source-protected intelligence.
 <strong>Classification Restricted would apply to</strong> (none): threat-information enabling adversary action.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (Per Classification Tier)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (Per Classification Tier)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6378,7 +6378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-per-classification-tier">🗳️ Elect
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Election Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>P0</strong></td><td>KU32/KU33 second reading is post-election — the Sep 13 result determines whether grundlag changes ratify. Coalition arithmetic is the binding variable.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy + JuU15 + migration trio are central campaign-frame documents. Government economic-stewardship narrative depends on Q3 macro execution.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Energy + housing + digital sector reforms are 2026/27 implementation windows; minimal Sep salience but legacy assets.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Procedural / oversight items provide background drumbeat for accountability narratives but rarely top-of-fold.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-7">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-7">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Master Scoring uses these classifications as input</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §R1–R8 cite the P0/P1 documents for risk-cluster construction</li>
@@ -6387,7 +6387,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-7">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6415,7 +6415,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CRX-ID</strong></td><td>CRX-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>Thematic clustering + cross-cluster interference + prior-run continuity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--six-thematic-clusters">🎯 Six Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--six-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-six-thematic-clusters">🎯 Six Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-six-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6465,7 +6465,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--six-thematic-clusters">🎯 Six Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Cluster</th><th>Lead Documents</th><th align="center">Total Significance Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>C1</strong></td><td>💰 <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong></td><td>HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236; HD024098 (counter-budget motion)</td><td align="center">28.0 (lead)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C2</strong></td><td>📜 <strong>Constitutional First Reading</strong></td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32</td><td align="center">18.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C3</strong></td><td>⚖️ <strong>Criminal Justice / Tidö Centerpiece</strong></td><td>HD03246 (JuU15) + HD03237</td><td align="center">15.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C4</strong></td><td>🌍 <strong>Ukraine Accountability + NATO Operationalisation</strong></td><td>HD03231 + HD03232 + HD01UFöU3</td><td align="center">23.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C5</strong></td><td>🛂 <strong>Migration / Rights Tightening</strong></td><td>HD01SfU22 + Prop 235 + Prop 229</td><td align="center">23.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>C6</strong></td><td>🏠 <strong>Housing AML + Energy + Sector Reforms</strong></td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 + HD01CU22 + HD01CU42 + HD03240 + HD03239 + HD03242 + HD03244 + HD03233 + HD03245</td><td align="center">53.85 (high count, lower per-document)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map">🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid Mind-Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map">🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid Mind-Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Week 16&#x3C;br/>2026))
     Fiscal C1
@@ -6511,7 +6511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-policy-mindmap-mermaid-mind-map">🗺️ Policy Mindmap (Mermaid
       HD03245 women's violence strategy
         HD10438 kvinnojourer interp</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is">🔁 Cross-Cluster Linkages (where the action is)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is">🔁 Cross-Cluster Linkages (where the action is)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6559,7 +6559,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-linkages-where-the-action-is">🔁 Cross-Cluster Linka
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Linkage</th><th>Connecting Documents</th><th>Mechanism</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>C1 ↔ C6 (Climate-coherence tension)</strong></td><td>HD03236 fuel-tax cut <strong>vs</strong> HD03240 Electricity System Act + HD03239 wind power</td><td>Government climate brand under pressure: relief mechanism contradicts green ambition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C2 ↔ C4 (Press-freedom-abroad-vs-home)</strong></td><td>HD01KU33 narrowing <strong>vs</strong> HD03231 Nuremberg-style accountability</td><td>Cross-cluster rhetorical contradiction; opposition-frame target</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C3 ↔ C5 (Brott-och-ordning + migration alignment)</strong></td><td>HD03246 JuU15 + HD01SfU22 / Prop 235 / Prop 229</td><td>Tidö-deal coherence; SD-base reinforcement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C4 ↔ Threat T1</strong></td><td>HD03231 + HD01UFöU3 → Russian retaliation</td><td>Tribunal + NATO eFP elevate Sweden's adversary visibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C5 ↔ Threat T3</strong></td><td>Migration trio → V/C/MP ECHR challenge</td><td>Litigation predicate prepared in counter-motion text</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C6 ↔ Lantmäteriet capacity</strong></td><td>HD01CU28 register Jan 2027</td><td>IT-delivery dependency on Lantmäteriet capacity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C6 ↔ HD10438 (Kvinnojourer)</strong></td><td>HD03245 strategy + HD10438 interpellation</td><td>Strategy + funding-stress accountability moment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--prior-run-continuity">🔄 Prior-Run Continuity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--prior-run-continuity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-run-continuity">🔄 Prior-Run Continuity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-run-continuity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6597,7 +6597,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--prior-run-continuity">🔄 Prior-Run Continuity<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Connecting File</th><th>Continuity Type</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md"><code>realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md</code></a></td><td><strong>Direct precedent</strong></td><td>Per-document deep dives on KU32, KU33, HD03231, HD03232, CU27, CU28</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>realtime-1434/comparative-international.md</code></a></td><td><strong>Direct precedent</strong></td><td>Nordic + EU benchmarks for KU33 / KU32 / Ukraine cluster</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td><td><strong>Direct precedent</strong></td><td>Scenario branches inherited and extended for fiscal+migration trios</td></tr><tr><td>Daily analysis 2026-04-15 → 2026-04-17</td><td><strong>Catalogue continuity</strong></td><td>JuU15 chamber-vote details (145–142) sourced from voteringar 2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>Quarterly NATO eFP risk assessment 2026-Q1</td><td><strong>Risk continuity</strong></td><td>T1 baseline established; this run upgrades to operational integration phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off">🔭 Forward Continuity (next-run hand-off)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off">🔭 Forward Continuity (next-run hand-off)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off"></a></h3>
 <p>The next analytical runs (daily 2026-04-19 → daily 2026-04-25) should prioritise:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03236 chamber vote (2026-04-22)</strong> — fiscal trilogy validation; risk R4 update</li>
@@ -6609,7 +6609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-continuity-next-run-hand-off">🔭 Forward Continuity (next-
 </ol>
 <p>Each of those events triggers a <strong>per-event analysis</strong> in the appropriate <code>analysis/daily/YYYY-MM-DD/{type}/</code> folder per Rule 1 isolation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6652,7 +6652,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">Election Salience</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>C1 Fiscal</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Cost-of-living = #1 voter issue; Q3 2026 macro = Sep verdict</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C2 Constitutional</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>KU33 second reading post-election ⇒ campaign vector</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C3 Criminal Justice</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Brott + ordning = #2 voter issue; Tidö centerpiece</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C4 Foreign Policy</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Cross-party consensus dampens electoral exploit</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C5 Migration</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>SD-base reinforcement; ECHR risk if struck pre-Sep</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C6 Sector Reforms</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Implementation-window 2026/27; minimal Sep salience</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-8">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-8">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-8"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Top-5 Developments uses C1–C6 directly</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Master Scoring distributes documents across C1–C6</li>
@@ -6663,7 +6663,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-8">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: Thematic clustering + cross-cluster interference + prior-run continuity (see <code>political-swot-framework.md</code> §Cross-Cluster Interference)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6695,7 +6695,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>MET-ID</strong></td><td>MET-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology Audited</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Self-Audit Type</strong></td><td>Per Rule 7 (Reference-Grade Self-Audit)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7, every reference-grade analysis package must include an explicit <strong>methodology self-audit</strong> documenting:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Which methodologies were applied to which analytical artefacts</li>
@@ -6706,7 +6706,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ol>
 <p>This file makes the analysis <strong>legible to readers, auditors, and methodology owners</strong> and creates a feedback loop into the canonical methodology guides.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6834,8 +6834,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology</th><th>Doctrine Source</th><th>Applied to Files</th><th align="center">Application Quality</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DIW v1.0 (Democratic-Impact Weighting)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code>; <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §Lead-Story Decision</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (with sensitivity analysis under 5 weight variants)</td></tr><tr><td>5-dimension significance composite</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Five-Dimension Raw Scoring</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>CIA-triad classification</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code> §CIA-Triad Impact</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (per-document)</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage-Completeness gate (≥ 7.0 weighted)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Coverage-Completeness Verification</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>TOWS interference matrix</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code> §TOWS Cross-Quadrant; <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §TOWS</td><td align="center">🟩 H (8 cross-quadrant pairs documented)</td></tr><tr><td>6-lens stakeholder perspective</td><td><code>political-style-guide.md</code></td><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td align="center">🟩 H (6 distinct lenses, election-2026 grid)</td></tr><tr><td>5×5 risk matrix + Bayesian + ALARP + cascading</td><td><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (8 risks, Bayesian rules, ALARP ladder, cascading map)</td></tr><tr><td>STRIDE</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1 §T3</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (full per-letter decomposition)</td></tr><tr><td>Attack Tree</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1 §T2 §T3</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (Mermaid trees)</td></tr><tr><td>Cyber Kill Chain</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1 (election-disinformation variant)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Diamond Model</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Scenario Analysis</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §ACH</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian priors with named triggers</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code></td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code> §Bayesian Update Rules; <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §90-Day Indicators</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative benchmarking</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> (6 jurisdictions)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster thematic mapping</td><td>Internal practice</td><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code> (6 clusters + linkages)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Election-2026 lens</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5/6</td><td>All Tier-A/B files</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (mandatory section, met)</td></tr><tr><td>Provenance discipline</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2</td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (timestamps + MCP attribution + selection status)</td></tr><tr><td>5-level confidence scale</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 4</td><td>All files (visible in tables)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Color-coded Mermaid diagrams</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 4</td><td>All 13 analytical files</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-uncertainty-hot-spots">🌫️ Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-high-confidence-findings--vh">High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-confidence-findings--vh"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-uncertainty-hot-spots">🌫️ Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-high-confidence-findings--vh">High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-confidence-findings--vh"></a></h4>
 <p>These conclusions are well-grounded in evidence and stable under sensitivity analysis:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lead-story selection</strong> — Spring Fiscal Trilogy as lead is stable under 3 / 5 sensitivity variants</li>
@@ -6844,7 +6844,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-high-confidence-findings--vh">High-Confidence Findings (🟦 VH)<a cl
 <li><strong>NATO eFP first operational deployment</strong> — official deployment timeline published</li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine tribunal architecture</strong> — published treaty text; founding-member status definitive</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-medium-confidence-findings--m">Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-confidence-findings--m"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-medium-confidence-findings--m">Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-confidence-findings--m"></a></h4>
 <p>These rely on interpretation of existing patterns and require update on triggering events:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coalition fracture probability under SD pressure</strong> — depends on SD strategic patience and L brand-management</li>
@@ -6853,7 +6853,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-medium-confidence-findings--m">Medium-Confidence Findings (🟧 M)<a
 <li><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</strong> — rising baseline but exact timing uncertain</li>
 <li><strong>Q3 2026 macro improvement probability</strong> — fiscal-stimulus lag-time + external-shock risk</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-low-confidence-findings--l">Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-low-confidence-findings--l"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-low-confidence-findings--l">Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-low-confidence-findings--l"></a></h4>
 <p>These have substantive open questions and benefit from active monitoring:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>US administration cooperation with HD03231 tribunal</strong> — public statements ambiguous</li>
@@ -6862,25 +6862,25 @@ <h3 id="rm-low-confidence-findings--l">Low-Confidence Findings (🟥 L)<a class=
 <li><strong>Lantmäteriet IT delivery on Jan 2027 deadline</strong> — capacity constraints not publicly disclosed</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-known-limitations"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-forward-projection-limits">1. Forward-Projection Limits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-forward-projection-limits"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-forward-projection-limits">1. Forward-Projection Limits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-forward-projection-limits"></a></h4>
 <p>Scenario analysis (§S1/S2/S3) projects 90-day base + post-Sep behaviour. Beyond Sep 2026, scenario branches collapse to election outcome. Probabilities are <strong>conditional on current conditions</strong> and require Bayesian updates as W1/W2 indicators fire.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections">2. Quantitative Vote-Margin Projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections">2. Quantitative Vote-Margin Projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-quantitative-vote-margin-projections"></a></h4>
 <p>Cross-party vote matrix (<code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §Cross-Party Vote Matrix) projects probable positions <strong>for first reading</strong>. Second-reading projections (post-Sep) depend on coalition composition — <code>[MEDIUM]</code> confidence at best.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration">3. Russian-Hybrid Magnitude Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration">3. Russian-Hybrid Magnitude Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-russian-hybrid-magnitude-calibration"></a></h4>
 <p>T1 / R1 calibration relies on <strong>Nordic-Baltic baseline pattern</strong> (Finland 2023–24, Estonia 2024, Lithuania 2021–24). Sweden-specific event probability is interpreted from this baseline. <strong>No insider intel</strong> is incorporated; this is OSINT-only analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-echr-docket-speed">4. ECHR Docket Speed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-echr-docket-speed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-echr-docket-speed">4. ECHR Docket Speed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-echr-docket-speed"></a></h4>
 <p>T3 / R3 / W2 timing depends on Strasbourg case-admission speed. ECtHR backlog ~22,000 cases; timing genuinely uncertain.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage">5. Stakeholder Position Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage">5. Stakeholder Position Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-stakeholder-position-coverage"></a></h4>
 <p>6 stakeholder lenses cover the major axes but <strong>omit specific industry sub-sectors</strong> (e.g. fishing, maritime, agricultural). For sector-specific impact analysis, additional consultation would be required.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity">6. Macro-Indicator Granularity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity">6. Macro-Indicator Granularity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-macro-indicator-granularity"></a></h4>
 <p>Economic-data.json provides annual-frequency World Bank data. Quarterly KI + SCB data would be needed for tighter Q3 2026 trajectory analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-source-protected-channels">7. Source-Protected Channels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-source-protected-channels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-source-protected-channels">7. Source-Protected Channels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-source-protected-channels"></a></h4>
 <p>This analysis uses only public-domain sources (Riksdagen, Regeringskansliet, World Bank, RSF, FH). No source-protected intel is incorporated. Real-world intelligence operations would augment with classified channels.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail">8. Fiscal-Arithmetic Detail<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail">8. Fiscal-Arithmetic Detail<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-fiscal-arithmetic-detail"></a></h4>
 <p><code>HD03100</code> total fiscal package size cited as "SEK 60 B+ net stimulus" — figure approximate from press summaries. Exact number requires FiU committee report parsing.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-would-strengthen-future-runs">🆕 What Would Strengthen Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-would-strengthen-future-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-would-strengthen-future-runs">🆕 What Would Strengthen Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-would-strengthen-future-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6954,7 +6954,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-would-strengthen-future-runs">🆕 What Would Strengthen Future
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Enhancement</th><th align="center">Estimated Value</th><th>Implementation Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>Quarterly KI / SCB macro-data integration</strong> for fiscal scenarios</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Real-time FiU committee report parsing</strong> for fiscal arithmetic precision</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>MCP server enhancement</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>SÄPO open-source bulletin RSS integration</strong> for R1 monitoring</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Strasbourg ECtHR docket scraper</strong> for R3 / W2 monitoring</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Cross-Nordic comparative dataset library</strong> (DK Folketing, NO Storting, FI Eduskunta)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Methodology + MCP</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Polls aggregator integration</strong> (Demoskop, Sifo, Inizio) for scenario tracking</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO joint-statement archive</strong> for R2 trigger detection</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>News journalist + curator</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>Lantmäteriet capacity dashboard</strong> (capacity assessment + IT-procurement portal) for R7</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Data-pipeline-specialist</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>Industry-sector consultation database</strong> for stakeholder-perspective expansion</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Curator + business-development</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>Federated bayesian-prior memory</strong> across daily / weekly / monthly runs</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Methodology + AI infrastructure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommendations-for-codification">📚 Recommendations for Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommendations-for-codification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendations-for-codification">📚 Recommendations for Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-codification"></a></h3>
 <p>The following observations are <strong>candidates for promotion into the canonical methodology guides</strong> during the next quarterly methodology sweep (2026-07-18):</p>
 
 
@@ -7008,7 +7008,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommendations-for-codification">📚 Recommendations for Codificat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Observation</th><th>Promote To</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sensitivity-analysis under ≥ 5 weight variants</strong> as standard for lead-story decisions</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.2 §Rule 5</td><td>Prevents lead-story-bias under single-doctrine fragility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>6-lens stakeholder matrix</strong> as default for weekly/monthly</td><td><code>political-style-guide.md</code></td><td>Civil-society + media lenses are routinely under-weighted in 4-perspective approaches</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-cluster TOWS interference matrix</strong> as standard for SWOT</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.1</td><td>Identifies strategic centres of gravity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Bayesian update rules with named triggers</strong> as standard for risk register</td><td><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x</td><td>Prevents stale risk inventories</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Comparative benchmarking ≥ 6 jurisdictions</strong> as default</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 8</td><td>Currently ≥ 5 minimum; 6 provides better Nordic + EU + Anglosphere coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ACH on scenario branches</strong> as standard</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Scenario Analysis</td><td>Surfaces inconsistent indicator combinations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Election-2026 lens grid</strong> as MANDATORY for all Tier-A/B files in 2026</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 6</td><td>Ensures every analysis is election-aware</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology-reflection self-audit</strong> as MANDATORY for all reference-grade packages</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 7</td><td>Already in v5.1 — confirm performance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off">🔁 Quarterly Methodology Sweep Hand-Off<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off">🔁 Quarterly Methodology Sweep Hand-Off<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off"></a></h3>
 <p>The following items should be raised at the next quarterly methodology sweep:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>DIW multiplier calibration</strong> — current grundlag-narrowing ×1.40 vs grundlag-expanding ×1.25 spread should be tested against historical decisions over 2024–2026 for predictive accuracy</li>
@@ -7018,7 +7018,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--quarterly-methodology-sweep-hand-off">🔁 Quarterly Methodology Swe
 <li><strong>Bayesian integration across runs</strong> — current updates are within-package; cross-run prior-passing not yet automated</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications (mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7050,7 +7050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-mandatory-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Imp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Implication for Methodology</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Electoral Impact</strong></td><td>Methodology stress-test: every weekly run between now and Sep 2026 will be reviewed against actual election outcome — high-stakes calibration moment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong></td><td>Three scenario probabilities (S1=0.50; S2=0.35; S3=0.15) are themselves the <strong>target</strong> of Bayesian update across the next 5 monthly + 22 weekly runs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter Salience</strong></td><td>If voter-salience rankings (cost-of-living > brott > försvar > klimat > migration > grundlag) are validated post-election, this methodology becomes a permanent prior</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong></td><td>Methodology will be <strong>directly judged</strong> by whether predicted vulnerabilities (Nordic-GDP gap, climate self-contradiction, cross-cluster tensions) translated to vote movement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy Legacy</strong></td><td>Methodology codification by 2026-Q4 → standard for 2027–2030 cycles</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-9">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-9">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-9"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md"><code>README.md</code></a> §Quality Gate Checklist — verifies methodology-application completeness</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Sensitivity Analysis — methodology stress-test</li>
@@ -7061,7 +7061,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-9">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 (event-driven) + Quarterly Methodology Sweep 2026-07-18 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7 (Reference-Grade Self-Audit)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7101,7 +7101,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>DLM-ID</strong></td><td>DLM-2026-W16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>2026-04-11 — 2026-04-17 (Riksmöte 2025/26)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>weekly-review-2026-04-18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total Documents Tracked</strong></td><td>23 high-significance documents (top of ≈150 in weekly catalog)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Persisted</strong></td><td>11 dok JSON files + <code>economic-data.json</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MCP Sources</strong></td><td><code>riksdag-regering</code> (32+ tools) · <code>world-bank</code> · <code>scb</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2 (AI performs analysis; scripts only download data)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--persisted-files-in-documents">📄 Persisted Files (in <code>documents/</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--persisted-files-in-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-persisted-files-in-documents">📄 Persisted Files (in <code>documents/</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-persisted-files-in-documents"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7252,7 +7252,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--persisted-files-in-documents">📄 Persisted Files (in <code>documen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Date</th><th>MCP Source</th><th align="right">Retrieval Timestamp</th><th align="center">Selected? (post-DIW)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>hd01cu22.json</code></td><td>HD01CU22</td><td>Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference (L1)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01cu27.json</code></td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Section H3 (L2)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01cu28.json</code></td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Section H3 (L2)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01cu42.json</code></td><td>HD01CU42</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser vid hantering av dödsbon</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:21Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference (L1)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01ku32.json</code></td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:22Z</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>CO-PROMINENT (L3)</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>hd01ku33.json</code></td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</td><td>Bet</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:22Z</td><td align="center">🔴 <strong>CO-LEAD (L3)</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>hd024098.json</code></td><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion mot Extra ändringsbudget 2025/26:236</td><td>Mot</td><td>FiU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (typ=mot, rm=2025/26)</td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:23Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Counter-narrative reference (L2)</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd10437.json</code></td><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet (interpellation)</td><td>Interp</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (typ=ip)</td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd10438.json</code></td><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟠 Cross-link to HD03245</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd11718.json</code></td><td>HD11718</td><td>Statlig närvaro i sydöstra Skåne</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td><code>hd11719.json</code></td><td>HD11719</td><td>Skattekrav mot kvinnor i tvångsprostitution</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:24Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Brief reference</td></tr><tr><td><code>economic-data.json</code></td><td>(n/a)</td><td>World Bank GDP / unemployment time series — Sweden + Nordic peers</td><td>Reference</td><td>—</td><td>n/a</td><td><code>world-bank</code> MCP</td><td align="right">2026-04-18T05:25Z</td><td align="center">🟢 Backdrop for fiscal analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog">📚 Documents Referenced But NOT Persisted (in upstream catalog)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog">📚 Documents Referenced But NOT Persisted (in upstream catalog)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog"></a></h3>
 <p>These documents are referenced extensively in this analysis but live in upstream catalogs (week 16 batch download) or in the realtime-1434 deep-dive folder. They are cited by dok_id throughout the analysis package:</p>
 
 
@@ -7351,7 +7351,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-referenced-but-not-persisted-in-upstream-catalog">📚 Doc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Source Where Persisted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårpropositionen 2026</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudgeten 2026</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel + el/gas</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine Special Tribunal</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Damages Commission</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperability data sharing</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Active forestry framework</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-16 (JuU15 protokoll separately)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategy on men's violence vs women</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity System Act</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power municipal share</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Anti-fraud electronic communications</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3</td><td>NATO eFP Finland</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition orders (migration)</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235</td><td>Deportation expansion</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229</td><td>New reception law</td><td>Daily catalog 2026-04-14</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--provenance-summary">🔑 Provenance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--provenance-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-summary">🔑 Provenance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7404,7 +7404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--provenance-summary">🔑 Provenance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Source-protected information</strong>: NONE in this run. All claims sourced from public Riksdagen / Regeringskansliet / World Bank data per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md"><code>Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION</code></a>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coverage-verification">✅ Coverage Verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coverage-verification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-verification">✅ Coverage Verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-verification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7444,7 +7444,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coverage-verification">✅ Coverage Verification<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Check</th><th align="center">Result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>All 11 persisted JSONs match a dok_id referenced in synthesis-summary.md</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>All documents with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 cited in synthesis-summary.md and significance-scoring.md</td><td align="center">✅ (14/14)</td></tr><tr><td>economic-data.json values cited in synthesis-summary.md and swot-analysis.md (W2, W3)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098 (counter-budget motion) referenced in cross-reference-map.md C1</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438 cross-linked to HD03245 in stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD11718 + HD11719 referenced in stakeholder-perspectives.md (Civil Society lens)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Realtime-1434 cross-references resolve to existing files</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--update-cycle">🔁 Update Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--update-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-update-cycle">🔁 Update Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-update-cycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7472,7 +7472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--update-cycle">🔁 Update Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger</th><th>Refresh Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>New persisted dok JSON</td><td>Re-run <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> row insert + verify selection status</td></tr><tr><td>Significance-scoring re-rank</td><td>Update "Selected? (post-DIW)" column</td></tr><tr><td>Article published</td><td>Verify each H3 section maps to a persisted or referenced dok_id</td></tr><tr><td>MCP source schema change</td><td>Re-validate retrieval timestamps + caching annotations</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-10">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-10">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-10"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/README.md"><code>README.md</code></a> §File Index lists every persisted + analytical artefact</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Coverage-Completeness Verification mirrors the verification table here</li>
@@ -7480,6 +7480,23 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-10">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-25 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2 (separation: data download vs analysis) + §Provenance discipline</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -7527,7 +7544,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:02.740Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:24.239Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html b/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html
index 817fe4ee0a..7d36ce9f92 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Deep Inspection HD03231 (Russia · Cyber · Defence · Ukraine)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.199Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:24.575Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.199Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:24.575Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Deep Inspection HD03231 (Russia · Cyber · Defence · Ukraine)","description":"On 2026-04-16 Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) and PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled Proposition 2025/26:231 (HD03231) proposing Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:03.199Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/hd03231.json","name":"documents/hd03231.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Deep Inspection HD03231 (Russia · Cyber · Defence · Ukraine)","description":"On 2026-04-16 Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) and PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled Proposition 2025/26:231 (HD03231) proposing Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:24.575Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/hd03231.json","name":"documents/hd03231.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, foreign-policy desks, cyber-defence advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -240,10 +240,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, cyber-defence posture, or procurement decision citing HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs (SÄPO/NCSC posture) · Q2–Q3 2026 (Riksdag vote) · H1 2027 (tribunal operational)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-article-generator deep-inspection (Copilot Opus 4.7)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Ceiling</strong></td><td>HIGH on tribunal legal effects; MEDIUM on Russian-response timing; LOW on US-cooperation trajectory</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>On 2026-04-16 Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) and PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled Proposition 2025/26:231 (<code>HD03231</code>) proposing Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine — the first dedicated aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg (1945–46) and the first criminal court ever to have jurisdiction over the act of starting a war of aggression against a P5-shielded state.</strong> Because HD03231 binds Sweden constitutionally to a Russia-accountability track, it qualitatively elevates Sweden's adversary-threat classification in Russian services' targeting taxonomy — from "Ukraine supporter" to "founding judicial-accountability actor". The 24 months following ratification carry <strong>elevated APT29 (SVR) and GRU Sandworm retaliatory-cyber probability against UD, NCSC, Riksdag IT, and Baltic-undersea-cable infrastructure</strong>, compounding the residual NATO-accession threat wave (March 2024) rather than substituting for it. HD03231 is completely silent on the operational-security requirements of founding membership — <strong>the critical policy gap is not the tribunal itself but the absent SÄPO/NCSC/MSB mandate-expansion package that should accompany it</strong>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cyber-defence posture elevation (UD/NCSC/Riksdag IT)</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> Kill-Chain §3 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R1 = 20/25</td><td align="right">Immediate · before first Riksdag vote</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead-story framing (security-lens vs legal-historical lens)</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Security-Weighted · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Lead-Story Assessment</td><td align="right">Pre-publication</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Defence-industry engagement posture (Saab/BAE Bofors/Nammo)</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §Business · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> O3</td><td align="right">Q2–Q3 2026 procurement cycle</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03231 crosses a qualitative threshold in Swedish threat exposure.</strong> The transition from Ukraine-supporter to founding-tribunal-member is the category change that Russian services use to reclassify targets. Historical precedent: ICC staff, systems, and Dutch host infrastructure were targeted by APT29 after the March 2023 Putin arrest warrant. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional irreversibility is the security-relevant asymmetry.</strong> Unlike arms deliveries (reversible) or sanctions (negotiable), founding membership under a Council of Europe EPA binds Sweden indefinitely — which is both a credible deterrent and a permanent targeting justification. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Defence-industry window.</strong> Saab AB (Gripen E/F, Carl-Gustaf M4, AT4), BAE Systems Bofors (Archer SPH, BONUS), and Nammo (small/medium munitions) gain a sustained Ukraine-reconstruction and EU ReArm procurement signal. EUR 500 B+ reconstruction market is the concrete defence-industry upside. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td>Political owner of tribunal accession</td><td>Continuity of commitment across post-election cabinet transitions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td>HD03231 architect</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; decides UD security posture under tribunal obligations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson (M, Defence Minister)</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten lead</td><td>HD01UFöU3 co-signatory; tribunal security-posture complement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carl-Oskar Bohlin (M, Civil-Defence Minister)</strong></td><td>MSB political lead</td><td>Hybrid-threat communication architecture owner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Charlotte von Essen (SÄPO Director-General)</strong></td><td>Operational threat-response lead</td><td>Annual Hotbildsanalys (H1 2026) will be first post-HD03231 assessment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Åke Holmgren (MSB DG)</strong></td><td>Civil-contingencies lead</td><td>Responsible for MSB Hotbildsanalys 2026 update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S, party leader)</strong></td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Cross-party tribunal consensus — maintains if party discipline holds</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD, party leader)</strong></td><td>Formerly Russia-sympathetic; now Ukraine-supporter</td><td>SD voting record on HD03231 is the diagnostic signal for realignment durability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong></td><td>Ukraine President</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 16 2025 co-signatory; political owner of the accountability architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional review</td><td>Yttrande on HD03231 — timing and findings affect committee tempo</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Utrikesutskottet (UU) chair</strong></td><td>Committee lead</td><td>Parliamentary processing pathway; the formal betänkande will carry security-posture references or not</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar">🔮 Next 90 Days — What to Watch (Forward Calendar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar">🔮 Next 90 Days — What to Watch (Forward Calendar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar">🔮 Next 90 Days —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Q2 2026 (May)</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on HD03231</td><td>Bayesian update on R1: if silent on security implications ⇒ R1 confirmed at 20/25; if flagged ⇒ R1 ↓ 2-3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jun–Jul 2026</strong></td><td><strong>Utrikesutskottet betänkande</strong> on HD03231</td><td>Committee record — will security gap be remediated via reservations?</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jun 2026</strong></td><td>SÄPO annual <em>Hotbildsanalys</em> (2026 edition)</td><td>Will HD03231 appear as a <strong>new</strong> threat-factor line item? First post-tribunal doctrine statement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2 2026 (continuous)</strong></td><td>MSB <em>Hotbildsanalys</em> update</td><td>Russian hybrid-threat posture baseline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2–Q3 2026</strong></td><td>NCSC cyber-bulletin frequency spike against UD/tribunal-adjacent targets</td><td>Early-warning signal for Russian cyber response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Continuous</strong></td><td>Baltic undersea cable incidents (SE-FI, SE-DE, SE-PL, Nord Stream shadow)</td><td>Correlation with HD03231 timeline strengthens Russian-attribution case</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sep 13 2026</strong></td><td><strong>Swedish general election (riksdagsval)</strong></td><td>Post-election composition → second-reading viability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sep–Nov 2026</strong></td><td><strong>Valrörelse-window Russian disinformation intensification</strong></td><td>Peak hybrid-influence period overlapping second-reading window</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>First Riksdag kammarvote on HD03231</td><td>First reading — SD position diagnostic</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H1 2027</strong></td><td>Tribunal operations commence (expected)</td><td>Threat curve steepens as first indictments approach</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2027</strong></td><td>First tribunal indictments (projected)</td><td>Russian response escalates to operational tier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tribunal legal architecture effects (EPA structure, jurisdiction)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Direct legal-doctrinal reading</td></tr><tr><td>Russian cyber-retaliation probability elevation</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Consistent with documented APT29/GRU targeting of ICC post-Putin-warrant and ICJ post-South-Africa-genocide-filing</td></tr><tr><td>Russian cyber-retaliation timing (24–36 mo)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Historic lag between announcement and operational response is 6–18 months</td></tr><tr><td>SD voting position on first reading</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong></td><td>Current SD posture is Ukraine-supportive; post-NATO realignment appears durable but not certain</td></tr><tr><td>US (Trump-era 47th admin) cooperation posture</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; veto/non-cooperation possible; no hard signal yet</td></tr><tr><td>Defence-industry benefit magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Saab Gripen E/F export pipeline strong; reconstruction procurement timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario probabilities (base / wildcard bands)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>42 % base case; wide CI on high-impact wildcards</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO/NCSC mandate-expansion uptake</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM-LOW</strong></td><td>Political will for mid-cycle budget expansion uncertain; Defence Commission 2025 had no post-tribunal rider</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations">🧩 What This Brief Does NOT Tell You (Known Limitations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations">🧩 What This Brief Does NOT Tell You (Known Limitations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Does not quantify Russian-asset exposure of specific Swedish firms</strong> — Saab civil, Volvo, Ericsson, Nordea Baltics figures are first-order estimates only; a dedicated economic-risk annex would be required for trading desks.</li>
 <li><strong>Does not map the full Council of Europe EPA member-state consensus</strong> — 40+ states; the political dynamics inside the Committee of Ministers are summarised but not analysed at depth.</li>
@@ -480,12 +480,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations">🧩 What This
 <li><strong>Does not forecast 2027+ tribunal docket composition</strong> — which defendants, in which sequence, under which jurisdictional gateway is beyond a 90-day horizon.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md">Data Manifest</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md">HD03231 L3 analysis</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 or event-driven (Lagrådet yttrande, SÄPO bulletin, Baltic cable incident)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SYN-ID</strong></td><td>SYN-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>news-article-generator deep-inspection</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:18 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-article-generator (Copilot Opus 4.7 — per workflow <code>engine.model</code> in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/.github/workflows/news-article-generator.md"><code>news-article-generator.md</code></a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodologies Applied</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1, political-swot-framework, political-risk-methodology, political-threat-framework, STRIDE, Kill-Chain Adaptation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Documents</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231 — Ukraine Aggression Tribunal)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reference Analyses</strong></td><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/ (gold-standard dossier)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus Topic</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraine — security dimensions of HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Freshness</strong></td><td>HD03231 tabled 2026-04-16 — FRESH (3 days old)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>1 primary (HD03231) + 1 companion (HD03232) + reference dossier (6 docs)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Depth</strong></td><td>L3 — Intelligence Grade (deep-inspection tier)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Proposition 2025/26:231 (<code>HD03231</code>) formally proposes accession to the <strong>Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA) for the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> — the first criminal tribunal established to prosecute the crime of aggression since the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (1945–46). Tabled by Foreign Minister <strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> on 2026-04-16, the proposition places Sweden as a <strong>founding member</strong> of an institution directly targeting <strong>Russian political and military leadership</strong> for the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.</p>
 <p>From the <strong>Russia, cyber threat, and defence</strong> analytical lens, this action triggers four analytically distinct but interconnected security consequences:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Strategic irreversibility and deterrence value</strong>: Unlike policy commitments (arms deliveries, aid packages), founding membership in an international tribunal is <strong>constitutionally binding</strong> and institutionally resistant to reversal. This is the security-relevant asymmetry: the commitment mechanism is stronger than Russia's ability to coerce reversal through below-threshold hybrid operations. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Russia/hybrid threat</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cyber threat to Sweden</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Defence implications</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>International criminal law</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral/domestic</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Recommended framing for publication</strong>: The security-dimension story is the <strong>most underreported angle</strong> — most coverage focuses on the legal-historical Nuremberg frame. The deep-inspection value-add is the <strong>threat intelligence perspective</strong>: what does founding membership mean for Sweden's threat posture, and how does it integrate with post-NATO security architecture?</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-lead-document-hd03231">🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-lead-document-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-document-hd03231">🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-document-hd03231"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-lead-document-hd03231">🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok ID</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td><em>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Companion</strong></td><td>HD03232 (Reparations Commission — Prop. 2025/26:232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Department</strong></td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Responsible Minister</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) — Foreign Minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9/10</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>L3 Intelligence Grade (deep-inspection)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security Classification</strong></td><td>PUBLIC but HIGH strategic sensitivity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-intelligence-map">🗺️ Document Intelligence Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-intelligence-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-intelligence-map">🗺️ Document Intelligence Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-intelligence-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph CORE["🎯 HD03231 — Core Document"]
         DOC["Prop. 2025/26:231&#x3C;br/>Ukraine Aggression Tribunal&#x3C;br/>2026-04-16"]
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-intelligence-map">🗺️ Document Intelligence Map<a cl
     style ICC_GAP fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style SCSL fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline">📅 Chronological Framework — HD03231 Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline">📅 Chronological Framework — HD03231 Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -775,8 +775,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline">📅 Chronological Framew
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feb 24 2022</strong></td><td>Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine</td><td>Trigger event</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Feb 2022+</strong></td><td>Sweden joins core working group on aggression tribunal</td><td>Foundational role established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mar 2024</strong></td><td>Sweden joins NATO (Article 5)</td><td>Security anchor — changes threat calculus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mar 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden signs letter of intent as founding member</td><td>Pre-accession commitment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Apr 16 2026</strong></td><td>Riksdag proposition HD03231 tabled</td><td><strong>This document</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2–Q3 2026</strong></td><td>Committee review (Utrikesutskottet)</td><td>Parliamentary processing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sep 2026</strong></td><td>General Election (Riksdag val)</td><td>Political context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>Projected Riksdag kammar vote (first reading)</td><td>Constitutional authorisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H1 2027</strong></td><td>Tribunal operations commence</td><td>Operational activation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2027+</strong></td><td>First docket opens — potential indictments</td><td>Putin/Gerasimov accountability trigger</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231">🎖️ Strategic Assessment: Security Implications of HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture">Why HD03231 Elevates Sweden's Threat Posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231">🎖️ Strategic Assessment: Security Implications of HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture">Why HD03231 Elevates Sweden's Threat Posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>HD03231 is not just a legal document — it is a strategic signal of permanent adversarial positioning toward Russia's leadership.</strong> Unlike arms deliveries (which can be wound down) or sanctions (which have diplomatic exit ramps), founding membership in a criminal tribunal targeting Putin, Gerasimov, and Shoigu by name (effectively) is <strong>institutionally irreversible</strong> under international law once ratified.</p>
 <p>Russia's FSB/GRU threat calculus will process HD03231 through three analytical frames:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture">Why HD03231 Elevates Swe
 <p><strong>Escalation signal</strong>: Sweden has crossed from "supporter" to "founder" — a qualitative threshold in Russian threat-actor classification. This maps to increased probability of Tier 2 (cyber) and Tier 3 (infrastructure/supply chain) operations.</p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit">Russia's Likely Response Toolkit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit">Russia's Likely Response Toolkit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -848,17 +848,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit">Russia's Likely Response Toolkit<a c
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Response Type</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Target</th><th align="center">Attribution Challenge</th><th>Deterrent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Disinformation</strong> — valrörelse-targeted</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Swedish public opinion, SD voters</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>MSB/StratCom</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cyber ops</strong> — governmental IT</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>UD, Riksdag, NCSC</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>NCSC hardening</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Phishing</strong> — diplomat/official targeting</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>UD officials, tribunal staff</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>GovCERT</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Infrastructure sabotage</strong> — Baltic cables</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Undersea cables (SE-FI, SE-DE)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>NATO MARCOM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic retaliation</strong> — SE firms in Russia</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Saab (civil), Volvo, Ericsson</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>EU sanctions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Proxy information operations</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Pro-Russia domestic voices</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Digital literacy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><code>[HIGH confidence on disinformation trajectory; MEDIUM confidence on cyber/physical targeting probability]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5w-deep-analysis">5W Deep Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5w-deep-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-who">WHO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-who"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5w-deep-analysis">5W Deep Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5w-deep-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-who">WHO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-who"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary actors</strong>: PM Ulf Kristersson (M) and FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) as authors and political owners. Sweden as founding member joins approximately 40+ Council of Europe member states in the EPA framework. The tribunal itself will ultimately target Russian President Vladimir Putin, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu (now Security Council Secretary), and CJGS Valery Gerasimov.</p>
 <p><strong>Affected stakeholders</strong>: SÄPO (Swedish Security Police) — operational response; MSB (Civil Contingencies Agency) — hybrid threat; NCSC (National Cyber Security Centre) — cyber defence; Försvarsmakten — military intelligence; Swedish companies in Russia (Saab civil div, Volvo, Ericsson, IKEA legacy) — economic retaliation exposure; Ukrainian diaspora in Sweden (~50,000) — judicial representation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-what">WHAT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-what">WHAT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden becomes a <strong>founding member</strong> of the world's first dedicated tribunal for the crime of aggression since Nuremberg. The tribunal operates under a <strong>Council of Europe Expanded Partial Agreement</strong> — a legal innovation circumventing UNSC deadlock (Russia's veto blocks ICC aggression jurisdiction over P5 members). Sweden commits to: EPA membership dues (est. SEK 30–80M annually), full cooperation with tribunal subpoenas and evidence requests, extradition regime activation (no immunity for accused).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-when">WHEN<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-when"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-when">WHEN<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-when"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Immediate</strong> (Apr 2026): Proposition tabled; SÄPO/NCSC posture should be assessed now. <strong>Q2-Q3 2026</strong>: Committee review and first Riksdag vote. <strong>Sep 2026</strong>: Swedish election — second reading timing post-election. <strong>H1 2027</strong>: Tribunal opens; Russian response escalates to operational phase.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-where">WHERE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where">WHERE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal</strong>: The Hague, Netherlands — tribunal seat. <strong>Political</strong>: Stockholm — Riksdag vote; Brussels — EU foreign-policy coordination. <strong>Operational</strong>: Sweden's CNI (governmental IT, energy grid, telecommunications, undersea cables in Baltic Sea). <strong>Strategic</strong>: Global norm-setting for ICL accountability outside UNSC.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-why">WHY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-why">WHY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Legal</strong>: Fills the "aggression gap" in the ICC Rome Statute (Kampala 2017 amendments exclude P5 members from ICC aggression jurisdiction without their consent)</li>
 <li><strong>Strategic</strong>: Irreversibly commits Sweden to Russian accountability track — insurance against future Western wavering</li>
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-why">WHY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why"><
 <li><strong>Security</strong>: NATO framework requires Sweden to align on collective defence commitments; tribunal co-founding is the diplomatic complement to Article 5</li>
 <li><strong>Historical</strong>: Genuine Nuremberg framing — Sweden positions as norm-entrepreneur in the 21st-century iteration of post-WWII order construction</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-winners--losers">WINNERS &#x26; LOSERS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-winners--losers">WINNERS &#x26; LOSERS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-winners--losers">WINNERS &#x26; LOSERS<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Outcome</th><th>Mechanism</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky government)</strong></td><td align="center">🏆 WIN</td><td>Founding member secured; accountability mechanism operational</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish diplomatic corps (UD)</strong></td><td align="center">🏆 WIN</td><td>International standing, tribunal leadership roles</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish defence industry (Saab, BAE Bofors)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ NET POSITIVE</td><td>Ukraine relationship deepens procurement; tribunal signals sustained engagement</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO/NCSC/MSB</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 INCREASED MANDATE</td><td>Elevated threat = elevated budget justification</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish civil society (Amnesty, Civil Rights Defenders)</strong></td><td align="center">🏆 WIN</td><td>Accountability mandate fulfilled</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (Putin/Kremlin)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 LOSS</td><td>Accountability mechanism directly targeting leadership</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish firms in Russia</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 EXPOSURE</td><td>Potential retaliation target (asset freezes, market exclusion)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD voters (Russia-adjacent)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 NEUTRAL-NEGATIVE</td><td>Tribunal forces SD to maintain Ukraine-support position</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Global South states</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 MIXED</td><td>Some see positive accountability norm; others see Western selectivity</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Monitoring Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Monitoring Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Mon
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Significance</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SÄPO annual threat report (2026 edition)</td><td>H1 2026</td><td>Will Sweden's tribunal role appear as new factor?</td><td>Read carefully</td></tr><tr><td>MSB Hotbildsanalys 2026</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Russian hybrid threat to Sweden updated assessment</td><td>Monitor</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic cable incident (Baltic Sea)</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Correlation with tribunal timeline = strong attribution signal</td><td>Escalate</td></tr><tr><td>NCSC cyber bulletin spike</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Increased phishing/intrusion attempts against UD</td><td>Response</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag vote on HD03231</td><td>Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>First reading — SD position diagnostic</td><td>Monitor</td></tr><tr><td>Trump administration position</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>US cooperation with tribunal affects effectiveness</td><td>Key risk</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal first indictment</td><td>H1–H2 2027</td><td>Russian response will escalate at this moment</td><td>Prepare</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SIG-ID</strong></td><td>SIG-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>DIW (Democratic-Impact Weighting) + security-significance multiplier</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber, defence, Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-matrix">📊 Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-matrix">📊 Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-matrix">📊 Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Raw Score (1-10)</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Weighted Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>News Value</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td>First tribunal since Nuremberg; founding-member status; historic global news</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Democratic Impact</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td>Parliamentary ratification required; treaty commitment; public significance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security Impact</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.2</td><td align="center">12.0</td><td>Elevates Russia threat posture; hybrid warfare trigger; cyber threat escalation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International Law</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td>Closes Nuremberg gap; first aggression tribunal since 1945; precedent-setting</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Domestic Politics</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">0.9</td><td align="center">6.3</td><td>Cross-party consensus reduces political drama; election-cycle timing adds interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic Impact</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">0.8</td><td align="center">4.0</td><td>Limited direct fiscal cost (SEK 30-80M/year); indirect economic implications</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strategic/Geopolitical</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.1</td><td align="center">11.0</td><td>Norm-entrepreneurship; NATO-alignment; Ukraine negotiating leverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Long-term Durability</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td>Institutional commitment; constitutionally binding; irreversible once ratified</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Raw significance: 9/10 | Security-weighted significance: 11.5/10 (security dimension elevates above raw)</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ranked-significance-findings">🏆 Ranked Significance Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ranked-significance-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-significance-findings">🏆 Ranked Significance Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-significance-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ranked-significance-findings">🏆 Ranked Significance Findings<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Significance Level</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>First dedicated aggression tribunal since Nuremberg (1945-46)</strong> — Sweden as founding member of a historic ICL institution</td><td>HD03231 text; FM Stenergard press release; ICL historical record</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Sweden's threat posture permanently elevated vs Russia</strong> — founding membership in a tribunal targeting living Russian leadership creates durable targeting incentive for GRU/SVR/FSB</td><td>Risk R1 (score 20/25); threat T1-T4</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Closes the ICC aggression gap</strong> — Kampala 2017 amendments left UNSC P5 members practically immune from ICC aggression jurisdiction; the Special Tribunal fills this gap via CoE EPA architecture</td><td>ICC Rome Statute Art. 8bis; Kampala Review Conference; HD03231 legal framework</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Swedish defence industry positioning in Ukraine reconstruction</strong> — the tribunal signals Sweden's sustained commitment, enhancing Saab/Ericsson/Volvo competitive positioning for EUR 500B+ reconstruction market</td><td>WB/EBRD Ukraine reconstruction estimates; Swedish defence export record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Russian disinformation will target Sweden's 2026 valrörelse</strong> specifically through tribunal-linked narratives — Ukraine fatigue, "endangers Sweden", cost arguments</td><td>Russian disinformation pattern analysis; MSB/StratCom assessments</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>NATO-CoE synergy</strong> — tribunal co-founding is the diplomatic complement to NATO Article 5 commitment; represents Sweden's "two-track" security architecture (military + legal accountability)</td><td>NATO framework; CoE EPA structure; HD03231 strategic framing</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Second reading timing (post-Sep 2026 election) is the critical vulnerability window</strong> — if Russian disinformation successfully shifts election composition toward Ukraine-fatigue parties, second reading faces uncertainty</td><td>RF 8 kap.; election cycle analysis; stakeholder positions</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis">🔍 Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">🔍 Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis">🔍 Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario Shift</th><th>Impact on Significance</th><th align="center">Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>US explicitly supports tribunal</td><td>+1.5 (reduces R2 risk; increases effectiveness)</td><td align="center">↑</td></tr><tr><td>Russia-Ukraine ceasefire before Riksdag vote</td><td>−2.0 (political urgency reduced)</td><td align="center">↓</td></tr><tr><td>Baltic cable incident pre-election</td><td>+1.0 (galvanises support; increases security salience)</td><td align="center">↑</td></tr><tr><td>NCSC announces UD-specific security hardening</td><td>−0.5 R3 risk (reduces vulnerability)</td><td align="center">↑ net positive</td></tr><tr><td>SD reversal on Ukraine support</td><td>−1.5 (second reading uncertainty increases)</td><td align="center">↓</td></tr><tr><td>First tribunal indictment (2027+)</td><td>+3.0 (political and security significance peaks)</td><td align="center">↑</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-significance-assessment">📰 Publication Significance Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-significance-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-significance-assessment">📰 Publication Significance Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-significance-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Publication Framing Priority</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Security dimension</strong> (most underreported, highest analytical value-add): What founding membership means for Sweden's threat posture — cyber, hybrid, disinformation vectors</li>
@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-significance-assessment">📰 Publication Significance A
 <li>International observers of Swedish foreign policy</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>STK-ID</strong></td><td>STK-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:32 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>8-stakeholder political intelligence framework · Security-enhanced lens</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia/security dimensions + parliamentary actors</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-position-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-position-matrix">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-position-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Power</th><th align="center">Interest</th><th align="center">HD03231 Position (−5/+5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government (M/KD/L)</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Kristersson + Stenergard co-sign; founding-member architects</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (parliamentary support)</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center"><strong>+3</strong></td><td>Nuremberg framing compatible; Ukraine support since 2022; populist Russia-hostility</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>S led 2022 Ukraine response; cross-party accountability consensus</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong></td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+3</strong></td><td>Accountability support; NATO-framing caution; ultimately pro-Ukraine</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>International law + human rights alignment; MP strong Ukraine support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Liberal European internationalism; C strongly pro-Ukraine</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky government)</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Co-architect; Hague Convention Dec 2025 with Zelensky present</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (Putin government)</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>−5</strong></td><td>Directly targeted; "unfriendly state" designation; hostile posture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">Operational</td><td>Elevated threat mandate; increasing security responsibilities</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NCSC</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">Operational</td><td>Cyber defence mandate; APT monitoring escalation</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MSB</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">Operational</td><td>Civil defence against hybrid threats; MSB Hotbildsanalys</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Framework body; institutional architect</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU institutions</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>EU foreign-policy alignment; frozen assets architecture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>0 to +2</strong></td><td>Historical ICC reluctance; tribunal-specific ambiguous</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab AB</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>+3</strong></td><td>Defence relationship deepens; reconstruction positioning</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Amnesty Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Accountability mandate</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish public (SOM/Novus polling)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>+4</strong></td><td>60-70% Ukraine support since 2022; Nuremberg resonates</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-1-swedish-citizens--public">🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens &#x26; Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-1-swedish-citizens--public"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-swedish-citizens--public">🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens &#x26; Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-swedish-citizens--public"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position on HD03231</strong>: Strong public support. SOM Institute and Novus polling consistently show 60-70%+ Swedish public support for Ukraine aid and accountability since February 2022. The <strong>Nuremberg framing</strong> used by FM Stenergard resonates powerfully — "Russia must be held accountable, otherwise aggressive wars will pay off" translates directly to a public that experienced Cold War existential threat and values the post-WWII order.</p>
 <p><strong>Differential exposure</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-1-swedish-citizens--public">🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens &#x26; Pu
 <p><strong>Electoral implications</strong>: HD03231 is not a polarising issue like KU33 (press freedom). It is a <strong>unifying issue</strong> that serves government narrative of responsible international leadership. Risk: disinformation-driven fatigue could make it mildly polarising by election day (Sep 2026).</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH for support; MEDIUM for durability under sustained Russian disinformation campaign.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Strongly supportive and politically invested — founding-member status is a major foreign-policy achievement PM Kristersson and FM Stenergard will campaign on.</p>
 <p><strong>Key individuals</strong>:</p>
 
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: "Sweden is a founding member of the first tribunal to hold aggressors accountable since Nuremberg. This is Sweden at its best — leading on international law and standing up for a rules-based world order."</p>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: <strong>Zero significant domestic risk</strong> on HD03231 itself. Primary vulnerability is if disinformation campaigns successfully reframe the tribunal as "provocative toward Russia" in ways that create valrörelse dialogue costs.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position on Ukraine/Tribunal</strong>: Strongly supportive. S led Sweden's 2022 response; Magdalena Andersson visited Kyiv. HD03231 represents a continuation of a foreign-policy trajectory that S helped build.</li>
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / M
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Enthusiastically supportive. International law, human rights, and accountability are core MP values. Daniel Helldén will likely frame HD03231 as a model for future conflict accountability.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten">🏛️ 4. Security Apparatus (SÄPO / NCSC / MSB / Försvarsmakten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten">🏛️ 4. Security Apparatus (SÄPO / NCSC / MSB / Försvarsmakten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SÄPO (Security Police)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mission-level impact</strong>: HD03231 ratification is a primary driver of elevated threat posture for SÄPO's FCI (Foreign Counter-Intelligence) and VKT (Violent Extremism) departments. Founding-member status for a tribunal targeting living Russian state leaders creates a <strong>persistent, long-duration threat scenario</strong>.</li>
@@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten">🏛️ 4
 <li><strong>NATO integration</strong>: SACEUR planning integrates Swedish tribunal co-founding as a factor in Russian motivation analysis for below-threshold operations.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--5-business--industry">🏢 5. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--5-business--industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-business--industry">🏢 5. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-business--industry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Saab AB</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Net positive. Sweden's sustained Ukraine engagement (confirmed by founding-member tribunal status) creates sustained demand for Saab's Ukraine-relevant systems: AT4 (anti-tank), Carl-Gustaf, RBS-70, Gripen E cooperation. The tribunal signals Sweden will not exit Ukraine engagement — the opposite of Ukraine fatigue.</li>
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--5-business--industry">🏢 5. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" ar
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: Russian court-ordered asset seizures on remaining Volvo legal entities in Russia.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--6-international-community">🌐 6. International Community<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--6-international-community"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-community">🌐 6. International Community<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-community"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Council of Europe (CoE)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Institutional champion; EPA framework architect. Sweden's founding-member commitment is a critical success metric for the CoE post-ECHR reform era.</li>
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--6-international-community">🌐 6. International Community<a class="
 <li><strong>Actively hostile</strong>. Russia will pursue every available pathway to undermine the tribunal: diplomatic isolation of supporters, legal challenges, economic coercion, and — at elevated probability — hybrid operations against founding-member states.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Review of HD03231 legal text expected before committee consideration.</li>
@@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitut
 <li>Key issue: What safeguards does UU recommend for tribunal communications security?</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-media--public-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Mainstream Swedish media</strong> (SVT, Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet, TT):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Will cover HD03231 through two frames: (1) legal-historical Nuremberg frame (positive, ceremonial); (2) geopolitical-security frame (analytical). The security dimension is significantly <strong>underreported</strong> relative to its significance.</li>
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Counter-narrative priority</strong>: The most effective counter-narrative is the Nuremberg frame itself — "holding aggressors accountable is what civilised countries do; Sweden did the right thing." This is also the most politically durable framing across the full Swedish political spectrum.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative (Russian cyber retaliation over 24 months), surface wildcards (US non-cooperation, dual-track sabotage), and assign priors that analysts can update as Lagrådet yttrande, SÄPO bulletin, and first-vote outcomes arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scenario-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scenario-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-19&#x3C;br/>HD03231 tabled"]
     L["⚖️ Lagrådet yttrande&#x3C;br/>Q2 2026"]
@@ -1666,8 +1666,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p>Probabilities are zero-sum within each branch, cumulative across the full tree. Bayesian update rules are defined per scenario below.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Ratified + Sustained Below-Threshold Hybrid Pressure" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Ratified + Sustained Below-Threshold Hybrid Pressure" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on security operational gaps (procedural review); Utrikesutskottet betänkande reports broad cross-party support; first Riksdag vote in H2 2026 passes with ≈ 340+ MPs; M-KD-L+SD bloc retains post-election government (or S-led coalition that continues Ukraine line). Tribunal ratified and deposited by Q4 2026; operational commencement H1 2027.</p>
 <p><strong>Russian response — base-case profile (2026-06 → 2027-12):</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042">
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH — this is the central projection reflecting base rates of Russian retaliation against aggression-accountability actions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022">🔵 BULL — "Ratified + Security Remediation Package" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022">🔵 BULL — "Ratified + Security Remediation Package" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande explicitly flags the security-gap ("tribunal accession requires Commensurate operational-security posture"); Utrikesutskottet committee recommends a follow-on instruction to the government to propose SÄPO/NCSC/MSB mandate-expansion legislation in H2 2026 vårändringsbudget. Either the current coalition or an incoming S-led coalition adopts the recommendation. A dedicated <strong>Defence Commission 2026 ad-hoc report</strong> on tribunal security obligations is commissioned.</p>
 <p><strong>What's different from BASE:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022">🔵 BULL — "
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — requires opposition policy entrepreneurship OR government self-correction; both are possible but not highly likely.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018">🔴 BEAR — "Operational Cyber Incident Before Tribunal Opens" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018">🔴 BEAR — "Operational Cyber Incident Before Tribunal Opens" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on security; government does not upgrade operational posture; SÄPO Hotbildsanalys 2026 flags the risk but is not politically actioned in H2 2026 budget. Between Q4 2026 (Riksdag vote) and Q2 2027 (tribunal operational), a <strong>tier-2 cyber incident</strong> occurs against UD, NCSC, Riksdag IT, or tribunal-adjacent Swedish infrastructure — or a correlated undersea cable sabotage event that is plausibly (but not conclusively) attributed to GRU Sandworm / APT28.</p>
 <p><strong>Impact profile:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1749,7 +1749,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018">🔴
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — consistent with Russian pattern; specific targeting vector and timing are uncertain.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Dual-Track Sabotage in Valrörelse Window" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Dual-Track Sabotage in Valrörelse Window" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: A single adversarial campaign combines (1) a Baltic undersea-cable or critical-pipeline incident in the August–September 2026 valrörelse window with (2) a coordinated Swedish-language disinformation surge framing Sweden as an "aggressive US-aligned belligerent". Attribution to Russia is plausible but below formal threshold; amplified by domestic Russia-sympathetic influence networks (legacy Alternative for Sverige / Sverigedemokraterna-adjacent online networks that have since repositioned but whose audiences remain).</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010">⚡ WI
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Analyst confidence</strong>: MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "US Non-Cooperation Blocks Tribunal" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "US Non-Cooperation Blocks Tribunal" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: The Trump administration (47th US presidency) formally refuses to cooperate with the tribunal on intelligence-sharing, witness deposition, or extradition grounds — framing cooperation as "interference with potential US-Russia negotiation". The refusal undermines the tribunal's evidence-gathering capacity; the first indictments are delayed into 2028 or constrained to evidence available from European intelligence services alone.</p>
 <p><strong>Swedish implications:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Analyst confidence</strong>: LOW-MEDIUM — US posture is the single largest uncertainty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid">📐 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid">📐 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid"></a></h3>
 <p>Heuer's ACH is used here to test the <strong>dominant narrative</strong> ("HD03231 triggers elevated Russian cyber threat against Sweden") against competing hypotheses. Consistent = ✅, inconsistent = ❌, ambiguous = ?</p>
 
 
@@ -1882,7 +1882,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid">📐 Analysis of Competin
 <p><strong>ACH result</strong>: H1 (elevated cyber retaliation) is the strongest-supported hypothesis. H3 (dual-track sabotage including physical) is a secondary credible hypothesis. H2, H4, H5 are weakly supported individually.</p>
 <p><strong>Prior weighted by ACH</strong>: <code>P(cyber) = 0.60–0.70</code> over 24 months from HD03231 tabling; <code>P(dual-track) = 0.18–0.22</code>; <code>P(status-quo) = 0.10–0.15</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">🗓️ Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">🗓️ Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">🗓️ Mo
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Scenario update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande explicit security language</td><td>If YES → BULL probability +0.10; BEAR −0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Jun 2026</td><td>SÄPO Hotbildsanalys 2026</td><td>If flags HD03231 as new factor → BEAR +0.05; BULL +0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Jul 2026</td><td>Utrikesutskottet betänkande tone</td><td>Silent on security → BEAR baseline; flags gap → BULL</td></tr><tr><td>Aug–Sep 2026</td><td>Valrörelse disinformation volume</td><td>High volume → WILDCARD 1 probability +0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Aug–Sep 2026</td><td>Baltic cable incident (SE-FI/SE-DE)</td><td>Incident → WILDCARD 1 +0.10; BEAR +0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td>Election result</td><td>E1 retained → BASE; E2/E3 → BULL viability +0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Oct–Nov 2026</td><td>Government-formation period</td><td>Extended (>30 days) → WILDCARD 1 vote-swing confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td>First Riksdag kammarvote</td><td>Unanimous → stability signal → BASE holds</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2027</td><td>US DoJ/State tribunal-cooperation posture</td><td>Non-cooperation → WILDCARD 2 +0.15</td></tr><tr><td>H1 2027</td><td>Tribunal operational</td><td>If smooth + no incident → R1 drifts to 12/25</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2027</td><td>First indictment (Putin / Gerasimov / Shoigu)</td><td>Operational-tier Russian response window opens</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">🧩 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">🧩 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1979,7 +1979,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">🧩 Cross-Reference to U
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Upstream run</th><th>Scenario file</th><th>Alignment to this dossier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>realtime-1434</code> (2026-04-17)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>BASE aligned with realtime-1434 BASE on HD03231 (ratification prob 0.50 vs this dossier's ratification-across-all-branches = 0.89 — <strong>this dossier raises ratification prob because 3 days of additional signal intake confirms cross-party consensus</strong>)</td></tr><tr><td><code>month-ahead</code> (2026-04-19)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Forward-vote calendar aligned; month-ahead tracks HD03231 as "H2 2026 vote, high confidence" — this dossier refines the post-vote Russian-response scenario tree</td></tr><tr><td><code>monthly-review</code> (2026-04-19)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>30-day retrospective supports the "elevated threat baseline" — this dossier provides the operational scenario branches for the next 24 months</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Probability alignment check</strong>: this dossier's BASE (0.42) is consistent with realtime-1434 KU33 BASE (0.42). The ratification probability across BASE+BULL = 0.64 is broadly aligned with weekly-review's "high cross-party consensus on Ukraine" qualitative assessment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts">🔁 Bayesian Update Rules (Quick Reference for Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts">🔁 Bayesian Update Rules (Quick Reference for Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts"></a></h3>
 <p>If the following signals fire, update priors as shown:</p>
 
 
@@ -2063,12 +2063,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts">🔁 Bayesian Up
 <p>These updates should be applied in the <strong>next</strong> realtime-monitor or weekly-review dossier after any signal fires — not in this one. This is a monitoring instrument, not a current state.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-1"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 or event-driven (first Lagrådet yttrande or SÄPO bulletin)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2104,7 +2104,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RSK-ID</strong></td><td>RSK-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:30 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>ISO 27005 + political risk methodology; probability × impact (1–5 scale)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber, defence, Ukraine security dimensions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-register--priority-matrix">🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-register--priority-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register--priority-matrix">🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register--priority-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-register--priority-matrix">🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Risk ID</th><th>Risk Description</th><th align="center">Domain</th><th align="center">Probability (1-5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1-5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Risk Level</th><th align="center">Action</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Russian hybrid warfare (cyber + disinfo + sabotage) targeting Sweden as tribunal founding member</td><td align="center">Russia/Security</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>20</strong></td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R2</strong></td><td>US non-cooperation with tribunal — evidentiary and enforcement gap</td><td align="center">Institutional</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Spear-phishing / APT compromise of UD tribunal planning communications</td><td align="center">Cyber</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R4</strong></td><td>Baltic Sea infrastructure sabotage correlated with tribunal milestones</td><td align="center">Physical/Russia</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Tribunal second-reading vote failure (2027) if post-election Riksdag composition shifts</td><td align="center">Domestic/Political</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R6</strong></td><td>Russian asset seizure targeting Swedish firms</td><td align="center">Economic</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R7</strong></td><td>ICJ jurisdictional challenge filed by Russia</td><td align="center">Legal</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R8</strong></td><td>Disinformation-driven Ukraine fatigue affecting second-reading consensus</td><td align="center">Political</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R9</strong></td><td>SD reversal on Ukraine support — Nuremberg framing fails</td><td align="center">Domestic</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MONITOR</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>US-brokered ceasefire shields Russian leadership; tribunal effectiveness collapses</td><td align="center">Geopolitical</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-heat-map">📊 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">📊 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title HD03231 Risk Heat Map
     x-axis Low Impact --> Critical Impact
@@ -2253,8 +2253,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-heat-map">📊 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
     R9-SD-Reversal: [0.75, 0.35]
     R10-Ceasefire: [0.90, 0.55]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deep-risk-profiles">🔍 Deep Risk Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deep-risk-profiles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score: 20/25 — CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-deep-risk-profiles">🔍 Deep Risk Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deep-risk-profiles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score: 20/25 — CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Sweden's transition from Ukraine-supporter to co-founding-member of a tribunal targeting Putin/Gerasimov/Shoigu is the most significant qualitative shift in Sweden's threat posture since NATO accession (March 2024). Russia classifies tribunal-supporting states through a threat-actor matrix where "founding member with institutional durability" ranks higher than "arms supplier" (arms can be cut; institutional membership cannot be easily reversed).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2282,7 +2282,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical">R1 — Russian Hybri
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Residual risk after mitigation</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (4/25 → 12/25 with mitigations; below-threshold operations persist)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high">R2 — US Non-Cooperation (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high">R2 — US Non-Cooperation (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: The current US administration's posture toward international criminal accountability mechanisms (ICC, ICJ, multilateral tribunals) is historically reluctant. A second Trump term (2025–2029) creates systematic risk of non-cooperation — or active obstruction — at the tribunal's critical evidence-building phase.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high">R2 — US Non-Cooperation (S
 <p><strong>Trajectory</strong>: The risk increases rather than decreases as tribunal operations commence. The US cooperation question will become acute at the prosecutorial evidence-gathering phase (2027+).</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: EU intelligence pooling (INTCEN); UK/Australia Five Eyes sharing; national intelligence from Nordic/Baltic coalition; OSINT (open-source intelligence) is legally admissible for elements of aggression crime prosecution.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high">R3 — APT Compromise of UD Communications (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high">R3 — APT Compromise of UD Communications (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: UD (Utrikesdepartementet) officials are conducting sensitive tribunal planning discussions through government IT systems that are not uniformly classified or isolated. APT29 (SVR Cozy Bear) has a documented pattern of targeting foreign ministry communications in NATO/CoE member states.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high">R3 — APT
 <p><strong>Trajectory</strong>: Active risk from the moment HD03231 was tabled (April 16, 2026). Tribunal planning correspondence is now a priority intelligence target.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: GovCERT monitoring; NCSC hardening requirements; FIDO2 deployment (in progress per MSB cybersecurity programme). <strong>Critical gap</strong>: Tribunal planning communications should move to air-gapped classified systems immediately.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high">R8 — Disinformation and Ukraine Fatigue (Score: 12/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high">R8 — Disinformation and Ukraine Fatigue (Score: 12/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Russia's active measures infrastructure (IRA, GRU, foreign influence coordination) has demonstrated capability to shift public opinion in Nordic democracies. The 2026 Swedish election provides a uniquely exploitable opportunity: the second reading of HD03231 (ratifying tribunal founding membership) occurs after the election, meaning the newly elected Riksdag decides. If Russian disinformation can shift the election by even 2-3 percentage points toward parties more amenable to Ukraine fatigue narratives, the second reading becomes uncertain.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high">R8 — Disin
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Trajectory</strong>: ESCALATING into valrörelse 2026. MSB prebunking capacity needs significant scale-up before September 2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-sensitivity-analysis">📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-sensitivity-analysis">📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2367,7 +2367,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-sensitivity-analysis">📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Affected Risks</th><th>Change</th><th>Overall Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>US rejoins international institutions</strong></td><td>R2</td><td>−3 points</td><td>Score 16→13 (HIGH→MEDIUM-HIGH)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Baltic cable incident pre-election</strong></td><td>R1, R8</td><td>+2 each</td><td>Galvanising effect — actually strengthens pro-tribunal consensus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden election: left majority</strong></td><td>R5, R9</td><td>R5 score +3</td><td>KD/L/M lose — second reading risk increases</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tribunal first indictment of Putin</strong></td><td>R1, R4, R6</td><td>+2 each</td><td>Peak hybrid-response phase</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-Ukraine ceasefire (Dec 2026)</strong></td><td>R10</td><td>+2</td><td>Political will may erode for second reading</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NCSC cybersecurity uplift for UD</strong></td><td>R3</td><td>−4 points</td><td>Score 16→12 (HIGH→MEDIUM)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2407,8 +2407,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SWOT-ID</strong></td><td>SWT-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:25 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>political-swot-framework v3.0 (TOWS interference applied) · Security-enhanced for Russia/cyber/defence lens</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraine — security dimensions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-article-generator (deep-inspection)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis">🏛️ Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-framework-note">Framework Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-note"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis">🏛️ Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-framework-note">Framework Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-note"></a></h4>
 <p>The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Swedish Government</strong> (policy owner, HD03231 promoter)</li>
@@ -2416,8 +2416,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-framework-note">Framework Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li><strong>Civil Society/Security Apparatus</strong> (implementation and defence actors)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective">Strengths — Swedish Government Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective">Strengths — Swedish Government Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective">Strengths — Swedish Gove
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1</strong></td><td>Sweden is a <strong>founding member</strong> — not merely a participant — meaning Sweden shapes institutional design, rules of procedure, and prosecutorial priorities from day one</td><td>HD03231 text; FM Stenergard press release; "core group" participation since Feb 2022</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S2</strong></td><td><strong>Cross-party political unanimity</strong> (≈349/349 MPs projected) — KU33 shows splits, but Ukraine accountability commands near-consensus; this insulates the proposition from populist reversal</td><td>Stakeholder position matrix; SD Nuremberg-framing compatibility</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3</strong></td><td><strong>NATO Article 5 anchor</strong> (since Mar 2024) means Sweden's tribunal co-founding occurs within a collective-defence framework — hybrid attacks below armed-attack threshold are partially deterred</td><td>RF 10 kap.; NATO Charter Art. 5; SACEUR guidelines</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4</strong></td><td><strong>Council of Europe EPA structure</strong> avoids need for UNSC approval — the single most important legal innovation; circumvents Russian veto</td><td>HD03231 legal analysis; CoE EPA statute</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S5</strong></td><td>FM Stenergard's <strong>Nuremberg framing</strong> is rhetorically cross-partisan — unifies conservative law-and-order base with liberal internationalist base; SD cannot oppose without opposing Nuremberg legacy</td><td>Stenergard verbatim; historical analysis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S6</strong></td><td><strong>Low direct fiscal cost</strong> — EPA assessed dues estimated SEK 30–80M annually; reparations architecture (HD03232) funded from Russian immobilised assets (EUR 260B), not Swedish treasury</td><td>HD03231 financial annex; HD03232 text</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S7</strong></td><td><strong>Signalling credibility</strong>: Sweden was part of the core working group since February 2022, signed letter of intent March 2026, and now tables founding-member legislation — the commitment trajectory is consistent and verifiable</td><td>FM press release timeline</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective">Strengths — Parliamentary/Democratic Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective">Strengths — Parliamentary/Democratic Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective">Strengths — Parliam
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S8</strong></td><td><strong>Two-chamber democratic legitimacy</strong> — unlike executive orders, Riksdag ratification gives the tribunal commitment constitutional durability</td><td>RF 10 kap. treaty approval</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S9</strong></td><td><strong>Bipartisan geopolitical consensus</strong> cuts across normal coalition/opposition dynamics — the vote on HD03231 will not cleave M vs S but will demonstrate Swedish democratic coherence to international partners</td><td>Stakeholder analysis; Swedish foreign-policy tradition</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective">Strengths — Security Apparatus Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective">Strengths — Security Apparatus Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective">Strengths — Security App
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S10</strong></td><td><strong>SÄPO and MSB already operate at elevated posture</strong> post-NATO accession; tribunal co-founding is an incremental rather than step-change addition to threat exposure</td><td>MSB Hotbildsanalys 2025; SÄPO annual report 2025</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S11</strong></td><td>NATO CCDCOE (Tallinn), StratCom COE (Riga), and JFC Norfolk provide allied intelligence-sharing that partially compensates for Sweden's bilateral operational gap vs Russia</td><td>NATO framework; bilateral intelligence relationships</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2594,7 +2594,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal effectiveness fundamentally depends on non-member cooperation</strong> — Russia, US (currently), China, and India are not members. Without US cooperation, evidence access, enforcement mechanisms, and asset-seizure coordination are severely constrained</td><td>ICC effectiveness literature; tribunal statute; US historical position on ICL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td><strong>In absentia proceedings</strong> — the tribunal will function without the accused present. Historical precedent (SCSL) shows this is legally viable but limits political impact; Putin/Gerasimov will not appear, making the tribunal partly symbolic</td><td>SCSL comparative analysis; tribunal statute</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td><strong>Sitting head-of-state immunity</strong> under customary international law (ICJ <em>Arrest Warrant</em> 2002) may protect current Russian leadership — the tribunal's design partially addresses this, but legal uncertainty remains</td><td>ICJ 2002 DRC v Belgium; Rome Statute Art. 27; Art. 98</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td><strong>Russia-facing hybrid threat increased without commensurate counter-capability uplift</strong> — HD03231 elevates Sweden's targeting priority in Russian threat-actor classification, but the Riksdag vote and public debate do not include a compensating security-investment announcement</td><td>SÄPO threat assessment; MSB capacity analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>UD communications security</strong> is not systematically hardened against state-sponsored spear-phishing at the level required by the tribunal's operational sensitivity — tribunal-planning communications (witness lists, evidence handling, prosecutorial strategy) may be vulnerable</td><td>GovCERT assessment pattern; comparative APT analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W6</strong></td><td><strong>Global South buy-in is limited</strong> — the tribunal's legitimacy (and thus deterrent value) depends on broad adherence; many African, Asian, and Latin American states see the ICC and associated mechanisms as Western instruments</td><td>UNGA vote analysis on Ukraine accountability; African Union position</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2658,8 +2658,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>O1</strong></td><td><strong>Closes the Nuremberg Gap</strong> — establishes that aggression by a UNSC P5 member can be prosecuted; durable precedent for 21st-century ICL</td><td>Legal analysis; tribunal statute comparison</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O2</strong></td><td><strong>Sweden as ICL norm-entrepreneur</strong> — tribunal co-founding enhances Sweden's international standing in areas (UN Human Rights Council, international arbitration, ICC Assembly of States) where credibility requires demonstrated commitment</td><td>Comparative norm-entrepreneurship analysis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O3</strong></td><td><strong>Reconstruction positioning</strong> — founding membership in tribunal signals sustained political commitment to Ukraine that enhances Saab, Ericsson, Volvo, and other Swedish firms' competitive positioning for Ukraine reconstruction contracts (estimated EUR 500B+ over 10 years)</td><td>WB/EBRD reconstruction estimates; procurement patterns</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O4</strong></td><td><strong>Strengthens Ukrainian leverage</strong> — operational tribunal is a deterrent against ceasefire terms that shield Russian leadership from accountability; Sweden's founding role supports Ukraine's negotiating position</td><td>Ceasefire scenario analysis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O5</strong></td><td><strong>Baltic Sea security benefit</strong> — tribunal signals to Russia that NATO eastern flank states coordinate not just militarily but through international law; reduces ambiguity about Western resolve</td><td>NATO cohesion analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O6</strong></td><td><strong>Defence industry catalyst</strong> — the tribunal's visibility creates political space for further Saab Gripen E sales to Ukraine, Carl-Gustaf deliveries, AT4 anti-tank system transfers; the legal-moral framing reduces domestic political friction for weapon transfers</td><td>Swedish defence export policy</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O7</strong></td><td><strong>Hybrid threat intelligence sharing opportunity</strong> — Sweden can leverage tribunal-membership relationships with ~40 CoE EPA member states for structured intelligence sharing on Russian hybrid operations targeting tribunal-supporting states</td><td>CoE framework; Five Eyes / EU intelligence corridors</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens">Threats — Russia/Hybrid Dimension (Focus Lens)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens">Threats — Russia/Hybrid Dimension (Focus Lens)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens">Threats — Russia/Hybrid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Cyber operations against Swedish government infrastructure</strong> — GRU/SVR APTs (Sandworm, APT29, Gamaredon) will escalate targeting of UD, Riksdag IT, NCSC, and Försvarsmakten following HD03231 ratification</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Disinformation campaign targeting valrörelse-2026</strong> — Russia's IRA/GRU active measures will embed anti-tribunal, anti-Ukraine-aid narratives in Swedish social media; SD voter base is primary target for narrative seeding</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Baltic Sea infrastructure sabotage</strong> — undersea cables (SE-FI Estlink, SE-DE Balticconnector-analogue), rail infrastructure, and logistics nodes are potential targets for "plausibly deniable" sabotage operations correlated with tribunal milestones</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Diplomatic isolation pressure</strong> — Russia will leverage relationships with non-Western partners to build a coalition opposing the tribunal's legitimacy; each state defection from tribunal support reduces effectiveness</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>Economic retaliation against Swedish firms</strong> — Russian government can seize/restrict assets of Swedish companies with remaining Russia exposure (post-2022 exits were not complete; legacy contracts remain)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Assassination/targeted harassment of Swedish tribunal officials</strong> — historical Russian pattern (Salisbury 2018, Navalny 2020/2024, multiple Baltic/Nordic incidents) elevates personal security risk for tribunal architects</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension">Threats — Legal/Institutional Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension">Threats — Legal/Institutional Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2770,7 +2770,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension">Threats — Legal/Institutiona
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>US refusal to cooperate</strong> — a second Trump term (2025-2029) creates systematic US non-cooperation with international criminal accountability mechanisms; without US intelligence, evidence base is severely weakened</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Jurisdictional challenge at ICJ</strong> — Russia could seek an ICJ advisory opinion or contentious case arguing the tribunal lacks jurisdiction; even a partial ICJ ruling against the tribunal would be a significant setback</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T9</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal funding shortfall</strong> — if major contributors withdraw or reduce assessed dues, tribunal operations could be curtailed before indictments are issued</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T10</strong></td><td><strong>Trump administration recognition of Russian territorial gains</strong> — a US-brokered ceasefire that "freezes" Russian occupation could fatally undermine the political will to prosecute aggression that ended with a US-negotiated settlement</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-analysis">🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-analysis">🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2820,7 +2820,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-interference-analysis">🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interaction</th><th align="center">Type</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1 × T1</strong>: Founding-member status elevates cyber-targeting priority</td><td align="center">S–T</td><td>GRU/SVR classify Sweden as Tier-1 tribunal target; UD and NCSC now face enhanced APT operations</td><td>SÄPO/NCSC immediate posture review; NATO CCDCOE bilateral engagement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4 × W1</strong>: EPA design circumvents UNSC but cannot enforce against non-members</td><td align="center">S–W</td><td>Structural limitation persists despite legal innovation</td><td>EU leverage via SWIFT/sanctions to incentivise cooperation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3 × T7</strong>: NATO Art. 5 partially compensates for US non-cooperation on ICL</td><td align="center">S–T</td><td>Alliance intelligence-sharing partially fills evidentiary gap</td><td>Five Eyes bilateral intelligence-sharing arrangement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O7 × T1</strong>: Tribunal intelligence-sharing network enables faster APT attribution</td><td align="center">O–T</td><td>CoE EPA member-state network creates structured threat-intel sharing channel</td><td>Formalise cyber-threat intel sharing among EPA members</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4 × T1+T3</strong>: Elevated threat without compensating security uplift creates window of vulnerability</td><td align="center">W–T</td><td>Sweden's threat posture increases before defensive measures are fully scaled</td><td>Emergency NCSC/MSB funding allocation; NATO force posture review</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S7 × T4</strong>: Commitment credibility reduces Russia's ability to deter through pre-ratification coercion</td><td align="center">S–T</td><td>Russia cannot credibly threaten to reverse HD03231 before vote; coercion window is short</td><td>Accelerate parliamentary vote timeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid">📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid">📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["Multi-Stakeholder SWOT — HD03231 Ukraine Aggression Tribunal"]
         direction TB
@@ -2881,7 +2881,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid">📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color
     style T7N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T10N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2917,7 +2917,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>THR-ID</strong></td><td>THR-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:28 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>STRIDE (political-adapted) · Cyber Kill Chain · Diamond Model · MITRE ATT&#x26;CK Framework</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraine hybrid warfare</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-register-priority-ordered">🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ordered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-register-priority-ordered"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-register-priority-ordered">🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ordered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register-priority-ordered"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-register-priority-ordered">🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ord
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Actor</th><th>Method</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian cyber operations</strong> against Swedish government infrastructure (UD, Riksdag IT, NCSC) post-HD03231 ratification</td><td align="center">GRU Sandworm, SVR APT29, FSB Turla</td><td>Spear-phishing, supply-chain compromise, zero-day exploitation</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Disinformation campaign</strong> targeting Sweden's 2026 valrörelse — embedding anti-tribunal narratives, Ukraine-aid fatigue messaging, SD voter manipulation</td><td align="center">IRA, GRU Unit 26165</td><td>Fake social media accounts, Swedish-language troll farms, deepfake video</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Baltic Sea undersea cable sabotage</strong> — correlation with tribunal-milestone events provides deniable timing signal</td><td align="center">GRU/military intelligence naval units</td><td>Vessel-based cutting/tampering; AIS spoofing</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Spear-phishing against tribunal-planning personnel</strong> — UD diplomats, tribunal preparatory committee staff, Swedish delegation</td><td align="center">SVR APT29 (Cozy Bear)</td><td>Credential harvesting; Microsoft 365 exploitation; OAuth token theft</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>Physical targeting of Swedish tribunal officials</strong> — low probability but asymmetric impact; pattern from Salisbury (2018), Vilnius poisoning attempts</td><td align="center">SVR / GRU special operations</td><td>Polonium/Novichok poisoning, staged accidents, intimidation</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Energy grid disruption</strong> — targeting Swedish power infrastructure in coordination with tribunal vote timeline</td><td align="center">GRU Sandworm (precedent: Ukraine 2015–16)</td><td>SCADA/ICS exploitation; pre-positioned malware</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>Supply-chain attack on Swedish defence industry</strong> — Saab, BAE Systems Bofors, Nammo supply chains contain Russia-adjacent contractors</td><td align="center">GRU, state-sponsored criminal groups</td><td>Third-party software injection; hardware tampering</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Legal counter-challenges</strong> — Russia seeks ICJ advisory opinion against tribunal jurisdiction</td><td align="center">Russia (legal &#x26; diplomatic)</td><td>ICJ contentious case, UN General Assembly lobbying, bilateral pressure</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T9</strong></td><td><strong>Ukraine fatigue narrative acceleration</strong> — domestic political exploitation by populist actors to undermine second-reading consensus in 2027</td><td align="center">Domestic actors (proxies possible)</td><td>Parliamentary questioning, media campaigns, economic-cost framing</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MONITOR</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T10</strong></td><td><strong>Russian asset seizure</strong> targeting Swedish companies with Russia exposure (Saab civil, Volvo legacy, Ericsson network equipment)</td><td align="center">Russian government</td><td>Administrative decree; court orders; regulatory pressure</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231">🎯 Cyber Kill Chain Adaptation — Russian Hybrid Campaign Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231">🎯 Cyber Kill Chain Adaptation — Russian Hybrid Campaign Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Adapting Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain (Hutchins et al. 2011) to Russian hybrid-warfare targeting of Sweden after HD03231 founding-member status. This is the <strong>most probable</strong> threat vector given documented Russian APT patterns.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3062,7 +3062,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231
     style IN fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style CC fill:#B71C1C,color:#FFFFFF
     style AC fill:#880E4F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context">Kill Chain Stage Analysis — HD03231 Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context">Kill Chain Stage Analysis — HD03231 Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3126,7 +3126,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context">Kill Chain Stage Analysis
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Specific Swedish Target</th><th>Russian APT Method</th><th>Detection Opportunity</th><th>Swedish Countermeasure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></td><td>UD official LinkedIn profiles; tribunal preparatory committee membership (public); MSB org chart</td><td>OSINT automation; targeted social media profiling</td><td>Threat-intel monitoring of suspicious LinkedIn activity</td><td>SÄPO/UD awareness training; profile minimisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaponisation</strong></td><td>MS Office macro exploits; PDF zero-days; LNK files; stolen credentials from dark web</td><td>CVE stockpiling; 0-day market purchases</td><td>Threat-intel feeds (NCSC)</td><td>Patch management; GovCERT bulletin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Delivery</strong></td><td>Email to UD officials with tribunal-related lures ("Draft tribunal statute", "Meeting agenda CoE")</td><td>Spear-phishing; watering hole attacks on CoE websites</td><td>Email gateway scanning; anomalous attachment analysis</td><td>NCSC email security; GovCERT filtering</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Exploitation</strong></td><td>Microsoft 365 tenant; VPN authentication; Citrix gateway</td><td>OAuth token theft; MFA bypass; password spraying</td><td>SIEM anomaly detection; failed-auth monitoring</td><td>Phishing-resistant MFA (FIDO2); Privileged Identity Management</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Installation</strong></td><td>UD network; Riksdag IT; MSB crisis management systems</td><td>Custom implants (SUNBURST-family); scheduled tasks</td><td>EDR telemetry; process creation monitoring</td><td>NCSC-certified EDR deployment; threat hunting</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C&#x26;C</strong></td><td>Beaconing through Azure/Office365 channels; Cloudflare Workers</td><td>HTTPS/443 exfil; DNS tunnelling; cloud-service abuse</td><td>Network traffic analysis; DNS monitoring; cloud-app access logs</td><td>NCSC SOC; DNS RPZ; CASB deployment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Actions</strong></td><td>Tribunal evidence exfiltration; witness list compromise; coalition disruption data</td><td>Archive collection; data staging; destructive payload pre-positioning</td><td>DLP alerts; data-transfer monitoring</td><td>Data classification; access controls; DLP</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Operation Against Sweden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Operation Against Sweden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ADV["⚔️ Adversary&#x3C;br/>GRU Unit 26165&#x3C;br/>SVR APT29&#x3C;br/>FSB Centre 18&#x3C;br/>+ IRA information ops"]
     CAP["🔧 Capability&#x3C;br/>SUNBURST/GOLDMAX malware&#x3C;br/>Sandworm ICS toolkit&#x3C;br/>Active measures (disinformation)&#x3C;br/>Physical sabotage (naval units)"]
@@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden">💎 Diamond
     style INF fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style VIC fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign">🏗️ Attack Tree — Russian Counter-Tribunal Campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign">🏗️ Attack Tree — Russian Counter-Tribunal Campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Prevent tribunal&#x3C;br/>from becoming operationally&#x3C;br/>effective against Russian leadership"]
     
@@ -3196,7 +3196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign">🏗️ Attack Tr
     style A2b fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style A2c fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political-Security Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political-Security Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3246,7 +3246,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th>HD03231 Context</th><th>Specific Attack Vector</th><th>Countermeasure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Russian disinformation actors impersonate Swedish officials announcing "tribunal position reversal"; deepfake video of FM Stenergard</td><td>AI-generated video of FM retracting HD03231 support</td><td>UD official channel verification; rapid-response comms</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Digital evidence chain-of-custody tampering before tribunal proceedings; altering intercepted communications metadata</td><td>Man-in-the-middle attacks on UD secure communications; evidence-database injection</td><td>End-to-end encryption; air-gapped evidence systems; blockchain evidence chains</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Russia repudiates tribunal jurisdiction; pro-Russia states issue counter-declarations; "tribunal legitimacy" narrative campaign</td><td>Global South diplomatic lobbying; ICJ advisory opinion request</td><td>Pre-emptive diplomatic outreach; UNGA coalition building</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation Disclosure</td><td>UD tribunal planning documents leaked; witness/evidence list exfiltration enabling witness intimidation</td><td>APT29-style spear-phishing; insider threat; stolen laptop</td><td>Classified handling; secure comms; FIDO2 MFA; DLP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td>Swedish government crisis management capability degraded during Baltic crisis (tribunal-correlated timing)</td><td>DDoS on Riksdag.se + MSB.se during key vote; Baltic cable cut</td><td>Redundant connectivity; DDoS protection; NATO CCDCOE support</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of Privilege</td><td>Russian intelligence personnel infiltrate CoE EPA secretariat or Swedish delegation</td><td>Long-term insider placement; social engineering of CoE administrative staff</td><td>Background check protocols; CoE security screening; insider-threat programme</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">📊 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-severity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-severity-matrix">📊 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title HD03231 Threat Severity Matrix (Russia/Hybrid Focus)
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -3266,8 +3266,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">📊 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-
     T9-Ukraine-Fatigue: [0.50, 0.35]
     T10-Asset-Seizure: [0.55, 0.45]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority">T1+T4 — Russian Cyber &#x26; Spear-Phishing (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority">T1+T4 — Russian Cyber &#x26; Spear-Phishing (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Immediate</strong>: NCSC/GovCERT advisory to all UD staff and tribunal-planning personnel</li>
 <li><strong>30 days</strong>: Deploy FIDO2-based phishing-resistant MFA across UD Microsoft 365 tenant</li>
@@ -3275,27 +3275,27 @@ <h3 id="rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority">T1+T4 — Rus
 <li><strong>90 days</strong>: Establish dedicated SOC monitoring capability for tribunal-related communications</li>
 <li><strong>Ongoing</strong>: NATO CCDCOE bilateral engagement for threat intelligence on Russian APT operations targeting tribunal-supporting states</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority">T2 — Disinformation / Valrörelse (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority">T2 — Disinformation / Valrörelse (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Immediate</strong>: MSB Nationellt säkerhetsråd briefing on disinformation threat to HD03231 ratification</li>
 <li><strong>30 days</strong>: Prebunking campaign identifying specific Russian narrative templates (Ukraine fatigue, "tribunal is Western propaganda", "cost to Sweden")</li>
 <li><strong>Pre-election</strong>: StratCom COE (Riga) engagement for Swedish valrörelse specific disinformation-response support</li>
 <li><strong>Operational</strong>: All-party parliamentary group on information security should receive classified briefing on hybrid threat</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate">T3 — Baltic Sea Infrastructure (🔴 MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate">T3 — Baltic Sea Infrastructure (🔴 MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Immediate</strong>: NATO MARCOM enhanced monitoring of Baltic Sea suspicious vessel activity</li>
 <li><strong>Protocol</strong>: Correlate any Baltic cable incident with tribunal-milestone calendar — attribution signal</li>
 <li><strong>Ongoing</strong>: Sweden-Finland-Estonia-Latvia joint patrol agreement for undersea infrastructure</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff">T4 — Spear-phishing against UD/Tribunal Staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff">T4 — Spear-phishing against UD/Tribunal Staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>GovCERT advisory (AMBER classification) to all UD personnel</li>
 <li>Tribunal preparatory committee use of classified communications systems only (no Microsoft 365 for sensitive content)</li>
 <li>Physical security review of delegation members' devices before international travel</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-timeline-correlation">🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-timeline-correlation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-timeline-correlation">🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-timeline-correlation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3340,7 +3340,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-timeline-correlation">🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tribunal Milestone</th><th align="center">Approximate Date</th><th>Expected Russian Response Escalation</th><th align="center">Priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdag first reading vote</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>Disinformation surge; spear-phishing intensification</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>General election (valrörelse)</td><td align="center">Sep 2026</td><td>Peak disinformation; potential Baltic Sea incident</td><td align="center">🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag second reading</td><td align="center">Q1-Q2 2027</td><td>Cyber operations against government infrastructure</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal statute enters force</td><td align="center">H1 2027</td><td>Diplomatic isolation campaign; ICJ challenge filing</td><td align="center">🟠 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>First indictments</td><td align="center">2027–2028</td><td>Peak hybrid response; possible targeted harassment</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3388,7 +3388,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Analysis ID</strong></td><td>DOC-HD03231-DI-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dok-ID</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Regeringens proposition)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tabled by</strong></td><td>Regeringen (UD: Maria Malmer Stenergard + PM Ulf Kristersson co-signed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Depth</strong></td><td>L3 — Intelligence Grade (Security Focus)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:37 UTC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop. 2025/26:231 proposes Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, constituted under the Council of Europe's Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA). The Tribunal — the first dedicated aggression accountability mechanism since Nuremberg — closes the structural gap in the Rome Statute where ICC jurisdiction over aggression requires UNSC approval, making P5 members effectively immune. By joining as a founding state, Sweden:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Acquires co-ownership of a historically precedent-setting international criminal institution</li>
@@ -3397,8 +3397,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 </ol>
 <p>The proposition is expected to receive broad — likely unanimous — UU committee backing (committee stage projected May–June 2026) and is projected to pass by ≈349/349 votes in first reading.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis">📊 Document Intelligence — Six-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism">Lens 1: Legal Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis">📊 Document Intelligence — Six-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism">Lens 1: Legal Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>The Aggression Gap</strong>: Under the Rome Statute (Art. 8bis, Kampala 2017), the ICC has jurisdiction over aggression — but only when the UNSC grants authorisation. Russia, as P5 member, can block any referral. The Special Tribunal bypasses this by operating under treaty law outside the Rome framework, with immunity exceptions based on individual criminal responsibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural Design</strong>: The Tribunal follows a hybrid model:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3416,7 +3416,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism">Lens 1: Legal Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidde
 <li>Designate national judges for nomination (1-2 Swedish judges typical for such mechanisms)</li>
 <li>Cooperate with tribunal requests (evidence, witness protection, asset freezes)</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-political-dynamics">Lens 2: Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-political-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-political-dynamics">Lens 2: Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-political-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Cross-party alignment</strong> (projected):</p>
 
 
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-political-dynamics">Lens 2: Political Dynamics<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>International law champions; EU alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M (Moderaterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>PM Kristersson co-signed; NATO partnership</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Support (confirmed)</td><td>Ukraine support evolved; anti-Russia posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>EU/international law proponent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Support</td><td>Anti-imperialism; ICL advocacy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>Human rights; rule of law</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>Coalition member; values alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L (Liberalerna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>Liberal international order advocates</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Critical vulnerability</strong>: Second reading requires <em>new Riksdag</em> composition post-Sep 2026 elections. If Russian disinformation shifts SD or V, the second vote faces uncertainty. Current projection: 320–349/349.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence">Lens 3: Security Implications (PRIMARY LENS — focus_topic: russia, cyber, defence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence">Lens 3: Security Implications (PRIMARY LENS — focus_topic: russia, cyber, defence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Threat elevation mechanics</strong>:</p>
 <p>Sweden's founding membership in a tribunal tasked with prosecuting Russian military/political leadership for the crime of aggression creates a <strong>permanent targeting incentive</strong> for Russian intelligence services (GRU, SVR, FSB). This is not speculative — historical precedent:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3485,7 +3485,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-d
 <li><strong>Legal proceedings data</strong>: Tribunal evidence chains, Swedish judicial nominations, cooperation requests</li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Gerasimov Doctrine relevance</strong>: HD03231 provides Russia with new escalation rationale under the "existential threat" framing — tribunals challenging the Russian state's legitimacy are classified as hostile acts under Russian strategic doctrine.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions">Lens 4: Economic Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions">Lens 4: Economic Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Direct costs</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>EPA assessed dues: SEK 30-80M/year (estimated from comparable mechanisms; not specified in proposition)</li>
@@ -3501,7 +3501,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions">Lens 4: Economic Dimensions<a class="" ar
 <li>LKAB/Boliden: Natural resource extraction JVs in post-war Ukraine</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Cost-benefit</strong>: SEK 30-80M annual cost vs EUR 500B+ reconstruction market positioning — a clearly favourable ratio</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process">Lens 5: Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process">Lens 5: Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Procedural complexity — two-reading requirement</strong>:</p>
 <p>Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or entail significant financial obligations require Riksdag approval. The critical constitutional question is whether <strong>two readings</strong> (requiring elections in between) are needed, which would stretch ratification to Q1-Q2 2027.</p>
 <p><strong>Timeline projection</strong>:</p>
@@ -3515,7 +3515,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process">Lens 5: Parliamentary Process<a class="
 <li>Tribunal operational: 2027-2028</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political risk in election window</strong>: September-November 2026 period is the maximum vulnerability window for disinformation targeting the second vote.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-context">Lens 6: International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-international-context">Lens 6: International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-context"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Founding member status</strong> (confirmed 43 CoE members + potential non-CoE accessions):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Nordic bloc: Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Iceland — unanimously supportive</li>
@@ -3525,7 +3525,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-context">Lens 6: International Context<a class="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ICC-Tribunal relationship</strong>: The Special Tribunal operates in parallel with ICC; not substitutive. ICC's Ukraine investigation (aggression + war crimes) continues. The Tribunal is <em>aggression-only</em> — a narrower but politically stronger mandate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--evidence-table">🎯 Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-table">🎯 Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3599,7 +3599,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--evidence-table">🎯 Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence Item</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden signed Hague Convention Dec 16, 2025</td><td>HD03231 proposition text</td><td align="center">Established legal basis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FM Stenergard + PM Kristersson co-signed</td><td>Proposition metadata</td><td align="center">Highest political commitment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ICC Putin arrest warrant issued March 2023</td><td>ICC press office</td><td align="center">Establishes aggression accountability precedent</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Russian cyber targeting of ICC post-warrant</td><td>NCSC Netherlands advisory (public)</td><td align="center">Evidence of Russian retaliation pattern</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 companion proposition (reparations)</td><td>Riksdag dok-search</td><td align="center">Dual-track accountability + reparations</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EBRD Ukraine reconstruction estimate EUR 500B+</td><td>EBRD (2023); World Bank Joint Needs Assessment</td><td align="center">Swedish economic opportunity quantification</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Gerasimov Doctrine: tribunals as hostile acts</td><td>Russian strategic literature; IISS analysis</td><td align="center">Threat escalation rationale</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>APT29 persistent targeting of Swedish govt</td><td>NCSC Sverige; SÄPO Annual Report 2024</td><td align="center">Baseline Russian cyber threat confirmed</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>SEK 30-80M annual dues estimate</td><td>Comparable mechanisms (SCSL, ICTY cost ratios)</td><td align="center">Fiscal impact estimate</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Riksmöte 2025/26 = potentially two-reading</td><td>RF 10 kap. 7 § constitutional analysis</td><td align="center">Second-reading risk to ratification</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-analysis-for-hd03231">🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-analysis-for-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-analysis-for-hd03231">🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-analysis-for-hd03231"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3656,7 +3656,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-analysis-for-hd03231">🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Vector</th><th>Target</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Spoofing</strong></td><td>Fake tribunal communications; spoofed UD emails</td><td>Swedish legal team; UU members</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Certificate-based email auth (DMARC/DKIM/SPF); out-of-band verification</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tampering</strong></td><td>Evidence chain manipulation; document forgery</td><td>Tribunal evidence Sweden contributes</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td>Blockchain-based evidence integrity; HSM signing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Repudiation</strong></td><td>Russian denial of aggression (state level); disavowal of actions</td><td>Historical record; legal proceedings</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Immutable evidence archive; multiple custodians</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Information Disclosure</strong></td><td>APT exfiltration from UD of tribunal planning materials</td><td>Swedish classified coordination docs</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td>CK-based ("Cosmic Key") compartmentalization; NCSC monitoring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denial of Service</strong></td><td>DDoS on tribunal IT systems; ransomware on cooperating national systems</td><td>Swedish judicial cooperation infrastructure</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Redundant hosting; offline backup; DDoS protection</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elevation of Privilege</strong></td><td>Insider threat within UD; social engineering of tribunal staff</td><td>Tribunal leadership access; evidence custodians</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Background checks; continuous monitoring; need-to-know</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific">📊 Stakeholder Quick Reference (Document-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific">📊 Stakeholder Quick Reference (Document-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3712,7 +3712,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific">📊 Stakeholder Quic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role in HD03231</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong></td><td>Co-signatory FM</td><td align="center">Strong support</td><td>Proposition signature; UD press release</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong></td><td>Co-signatory PM</td><td align="center">Strong support</td><td>Proposition signature</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UU Ordförande</strong></td><td>Committee lead</td><td align="center">Expected support</td><td>Cross-party alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO</strong></td><td>Security implementation</td><td align="center">Neutral/supportive</td><td>Enhanced mandate needed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NCSC</strong></td><td>Cyber threat response</td><td align="center">Neutral/supportive</td><td>Elevated alert protocol needed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab</strong></td><td>Defence industry beneficiary</td><td align="center">Support</td><td>Reconstruction positioning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia/GRU/SVR</strong></td><td>Primary adversary</td><td align="center"><strong>HOSTILE</strong></td><td>Documented retaliatory cyber pattern post-ICC warrant</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-to-monitor">🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-to-monitor">🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3755,7 +3755,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-to-monitor">🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Watch Period</th><th>Significance if Triggered</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UD announces enhanced security protocols</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>Confirms institutional awareness of elevated threat posture</td></tr><tr><td>Russian disinformation campaign targeting Sweden on Ukraine tribunal</td><td align="center">Sep 2026</td><td>Confirms T2 threat vector active; note MSB/StratCom responses</td></tr><tr><td>APT29 spearphishing targeting UU members</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>T1 threat active; NCSC advisory expected</td></tr><tr><td>UK/France announce tribunal funding contributions</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td><td>Reduces Swedish relative financial burden; increases political momentum</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal Statute enters into force</td><td align="center">2026-2027</td><td>Operational phase triggers; Swedish ratification required before this</td></tr><tr><td>First indictment issued</td><td align="center">2027-2028</td><td>Maximum political salience moment; tests party cohesion on second vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3787,11 +3787,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Situate Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine within comparative practice across: (1) <strong>aggression-accountability jurisprudence</strong> (historic and contemporary tribunals); (2) <strong>Russia-accountability foreign-policy posture</strong> (Nordic + EU benchmarking); (3) <strong>post-accountability-action hybrid-threat exposure</strong> patterns.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>Structured comparative-politics analysis (most-similar / most-different design) · Heuer's <em>Psychology of Intelligence Analysis</em> §9 · Mill's Methods of Agreement / Difference</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Calibration</strong></td><td>Each comparison labelled with <code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> based on source depth</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data sources</strong></td><td>World Bank WDI, NATO Public Diplomacy Division, Council of Europe Treaty Office, SIPRI Military Expenditure DB, Mandiant/Google TAG APT reports 2022–2025, academic literature on Nuremberg/SCSL/STL/ICTY</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 1 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Analogous Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 1 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Analogous Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: HD03231 creates the <strong>first dedicated tribunal for the crime of aggression since Nuremberg (1945–46)</strong>. How did earlier institutional analogues perform — and what does their trajectory tell us about HD03231?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents">Historical Benchmarks (≥ 5 Jurisdictional Precedents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents">Historical Benchmarks (≥ 5 Jurisdictional Precedents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents">Historical Benchm
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Key comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Of the 8 benchmarked aggression/atrocity tribunals, <strong>zero have failed jurisdictionally once operational</strong> — the primary risk is not institutional collapse but <strong>slow tempo</strong>. ECCC averaged 5.3 years per conviction; ICTY averaged 3.8 years; SCSL averaged 1.2 years (exceptional efficiency, owing to Sierra Leonean state cooperation). HD03231's tribunal operating without Russian-state cooperation and requiring evidence-gathering from active-conflict Ukraine territory implies a projected <strong>4–7 year tempo per conviction</strong>, with first indictments likely H2 2027 and first verdicts no earlier than 2029–2030.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes">Head-of-State Immunity — Comparative Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes">Head-of-State Immunity — Comparative Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3897,11 +3897,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes">Head-of-State Immunity
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Case</th><th>Outcome</th><th>Signal for Putin indictment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Slobodan Milošević (ICTY, 2002–06)</td><td>Died during trial; no conviction</td><td>Procedural mortality risk</td></tr><tr><td>Charles Taylor (SCSL, 2006–12)</td><td>Convicted 50 years</td><td><strong>Direct positive precedent</strong> — hybrid tribunal can convict a sitting/former head of state <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td>Omar al-Bashir (ICC, 2009+)</td><td>Arrest warrant outstanding 16 years; state-cooperation failures</td><td>Negative precedent — political-will decay over time <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td>Vladimir Putin (ICC, 2023+)</td><td>Arrest warrant; no movement</td><td>Direct peer case; HD03231 tribunal is the <strong>aggression-crime complement</strong> (ICC covers war crimes + children; tribunal covers aggression) <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position">🧭 Section 2 — Nordic &#x26; EU Comparative: Which States Do What, and Where Does Sweden Position?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position">🧭 Section 2 — Nordic &#x26; EU Comparative: Which States Do What, and Where Does Sweden Position?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: Which comparable European states have taken formal judicial-accountability positions on Russian aggression against Ukraine — and where does Sweden's founding-member status sit in the gradient?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design">Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design">Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3957,7 +3957,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design">Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar De
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Tribunal membership</th><th align="center">NATO accession</th><th align="center">RSF press-freedom rank 2025</th><th align="center">SIPRI 2024 mil-exp % GDP</th><th>Posture summary</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Founding member (HD03231)</strong></td><td align="center">March 2024</td><td align="center">4th</td><td align="center">≥ 2.0 % (NATO target met)</td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneur position</strong> (innovation pattern)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 Norway</strong></td><td align="center">Member (pre-accession track)</td><td align="center">1949</td><td align="center">1st</td><td align="center">2.23 %</td><td>Follower pattern — strong support but not founding</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">Member</td><td align="center">1949</td><td align="center">3rd</td><td align="center">2.37 %</td><td>Follower pattern — with F-35 donations to Ukraine (2023+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 Finland</strong></td><td align="center">Member</td><td align="center">April 2023</td><td align="center">5th</td><td align="center">2.41 %</td><td>Follower pattern — NATO accession is primary positioning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇮🇸 Iceland</strong></td><td align="center">Member (supports via CoE)</td><td align="center">1949 (no military)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">N/A (no armed forces)</td><td>Diplomatic support only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Comparative takeaway (Nordic cluster)</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's <strong>founding</strong> status differentiates it from Nordic peers. Denmark and Norway are politically fully aligned but have not taken institutional-founding positions. This is the <strong>innovation pattern</strong>: Sweden assumes a norm-entrepreneurship role analogous to its 1966 Palme government's international-mediation tradition. It is also the <strong>exposure pattern</strong>: Sweden's visibility in Russian targeting taxonomy rises relative to Nordic peers.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design">EU Baseline (Most-Different Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design">EU Baseline (Most-Different Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4028,7 +4028,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design">EU Baseline (Most-Different Design
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Tribunal posture</th><th align="center">NATO position</th><th>Historical Russia-posture</th><th>Comparative note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 Germany</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member (with Sweden)</td><td align="center">1955</td><td>Historic Ostpolitik → post-2022 Zeitenwende</td><td>Sweden's most similar large-state partner in the tribunal architecture; Germany's EUR 100 B Bundeswehr special fund parallels Swedish defence uplift <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member (Hague host)</td><td align="center">1949</td><td>Post-MH17 (2014) accountability activism</td><td>The Netherlands is the <strong>operational</strong> anchor (Hague seat); Sweden is a <strong>founding-legitimacy</strong> anchor <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 France</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">1949 (partial withdrawal 1966–2009)</td><td>Traditional diplomatic engagement with Russia</td><td>Active founding-member participation represents a departure from French Russia-hedging pattern <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇵🇱 Poland</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">1999</td><td>Historical enmity; front-line state</td><td>Strongest political-will member; provides evidence-gathering infrastructure via front-line access <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇪🇪 Estonia / 🇱🇻 Latvia / 🇱🇹 Lithuania</strong></td><td align="center">Members</td><td align="center">2004</td><td>Existential-threat framing</td><td>Highest per-capita commitment; already targeted by Russian cyber (Sandworm operations 2022–2025) — <strong>direct peer case for Sweden's expected targeting profile</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇭🇺 Hungary</strong></td><td align="center">Non-participant (ambiguous)</td><td align="center">1999</td><td>Orbán-era Russia-friendliness</td><td>The <strong>anti-innovation</strong> posture; highlights EU-wide fracture lines on Russia policy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇮🇹 Italy</strong></td><td align="center">Participant (non-founding)</td><td align="center">1949</td><td>Historic ENI-era Russian energy ties</td><td>Mid-ground position; less exposed than Sweden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇪🇸 Spain</strong></td><td align="center">Participant (non-founding)</td><td align="center">1982</td><td>Traditional passivity on Russia</td><td>Mid-ground; similar to Italy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>EU takeaway</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Within EU, Sweden joins a <strong>founding cluster of 8 states</strong> (SE, DE, NL, FR, PL, EE, LV, LT) at the highest political-will tier. This places Sweden in the <strong>top decile</strong> of EU Russia-accountability posture — a position aligned with the three Baltic states that are already documented APT targets. Sweden's threat exposure over 2026–2028 will resemble the Baltic pattern more than the Nordic pattern.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative">Nordic-vs-Baltic Targeting-Rate Comparison (2022–2025, indicative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative">Nordic-vs-Baltic Targeting-Rate Comparison (2022–2025, indicative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4102,11 +4102,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative">Nordi
 <p><strong>Analytical finding</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Pre-HD03231 Sweden's targeting profile matched the <strong>mid-Nordic</strong> pattern. Post-HD03231 the founding-member signal combined with the NATO-accession recency moves Sweden toward the <strong>Baltic-peer pattern</strong> over 24 months. The executive-brief R1 risk score (20/25 CRITICAL) is calibrated to this convergence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation">🧭 Section 3 — Economic Resilience Against Russian Economic Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation">🧭 Section 3 — Economic Resilience Against Russian Economic Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: Post-HD03231, which Russian economic-retaliation vectors are realistic, and how resilient is the Swedish economy relative to peers?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024">Economic Baseline (World Bank WDI 2024)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024">Economic Baseline (World Bank WDI 2024)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4192,7 +4192,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024">Economic Baseline (World Bank
 <li>NATO Article 5 security umbrella reduces asymmetric-economic-coercion risk (Russia cannot isolate Sweden without confronting alliance)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard">🎯 Where Sweden Innovates, Follows, Diverges (Tier-C Required Scorecard)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard">🎯 Where Sweden Innovates, Follows, Diverges (Tier-C Required Scorecard)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4256,8 +4256,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden's position</th><th align="center">Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Founding-member status in aggression tribunal</td><td>First Nordic + Baltic founding-tier participant</td><td align="center"><strong>🆕 INNOVATES</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Nuremberg-framing in official rhetoric</td><td>FM Stenergard explicit references</td><td align="center"><strong>🆕 INNOVATES</strong> (Germany is more cautious with Nuremberg framing for historical reasons)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional commitment depth (two-reading grundlag process)</td><td>Follows German and Dutch parliamentary-ratification patterns</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Defence-spending compliance (≥ 2 % GDP NATO target)</td><td>Met 2024; aligned with NATO commitment</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Cyber/hybrid-defence institutional architecture (NCSC, SÄPO, MSB, FRA)</td><td>Existing institutions; no HD03231-specific upgrade</td><td align="center">⚠️ <strong>DIVERGES</strong> (from Baltic-state model which treated NATO accession as catalyst for institutional uplift; Sweden treated NATO accession and now tribunal accession as <strong>communications</strong> events not institutional-design events)</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal security-posture accompaniment</td><td><strong>Absent</strong> — HD03231 contains no operational-security rider</td><td align="center">⚠️ <strong>DIVERGES</strong> (Estonia's 2004 NATO accession was accompanied by a formal cyber-defence strategy update; Sweden has produced no equivalent)</td></tr><tr><td>Trans-Atlantic alignment (US-UK-FR coordination in tribunal)</td><td>Strong European coordination; ambiguous US-cooperation signal</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> European pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Information-warfare doctrine and MSB coordination</td><td>Existing doctrine; not updated for tribunal context</td><td align="center">⚠️ <strong>DIVERGES</strong> (Finland's 2022 NATO-accession included formal disinformation-resilience programme update)</td></tr><tr><td>Defence-industry coordination with tribunal signalling</td><td>Saab/BAE Bofors/Nammo commercial pipelines support the strategic line</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> (coherent with foreign-policy direction)</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial independence and ICL contribution (attorneys, academics)</td><td>Swedish legal community has strong international-law pedigree (Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration, Raoul Wallenberg Institute)</td><td align="center"><strong>🆕 INNOVATES</strong> (provides specific jurist talent pool)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Summary scorecard</strong>: Sweden <strong>innovates</strong> in 3 dimensions (founding status, Nuremberg rhetoric, jurist talent), <strong>follows</strong> in 3 (constitutional process, defence spending, EU coordination), and <strong>diverges</strong> in 3 (cyber/hybrid institutional accompaniment, security-posture rider, information-warfare doctrine update) — with the <strong>divergences being the systematic policy-gap signal</strong> that the executive-brief flags as the editorially highest-value finding.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle">🌐 Section 4 — Ukraine Reconstruction Market Benchmarking (Defence-Industry Angle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access">Reconstruction Market Size and Defence-Industry Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle">🌐 Section 4 — Ukraine Reconstruction Market Benchmarking (Defence-Industry Angle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access">Reconstruction Market Size and Defence-Industry Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4294,7 +4294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access">Reconstructio
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th align="center">Estimate (EUR B)</th><th align="center">Defence-industry share</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>World Bank Rapid Damage Assessment (2024)</td><td align="center">486</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Civilian reconstruction-focused</td></tr><tr><td>European Commission Ukraine Facility (2024–27)</td><td align="center">50</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Budget-support + investment</td></tr><tr><td>EU ReArm package (2025–29)</td><td align="center">150–800</td><td align="center">≥ 30 %</td><td>Includes Ukraine-support budget lines</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine Business Compact (industry initiative)</td><td align="center">500+ cumulative 10-year</td><td align="center">≥ 20 % (defence + dual-use)</td><td>Includes air-defence, ground-based replenishment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231">Swedish Defence-Industry Positioning (Post-HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231">Swedish Defence-Industry Positioning (Post-HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4339,7 +4339,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231">Swedish Defence-In
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Company</th><th>Key product</th><th>Ukraine relationship</th><th>HD03231 signal benefit</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Saab AB</strong></td><td>Gripen E/F; Carl-Gustaf M4; AT4; RBS 70 NG</td><td>Carl-Gustaf confirmed Ukraine donation; Gripen F discussion ongoing</td><td>Sustained institutional signal = procurement-pipeline credibility <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>BAE Systems Bofors</strong></td><td>Archer SPH; BONUS guided artillery; CV90 IFV</td><td>Archer donated 2022; CV90 procurement pipeline with CZ/SK/UA</td><td>Reconstruction-phase armour procurement viable <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nammo</strong> (SE-NO)</td><td>Medium-calibre ammunition; rocket motors</td><td>Supplies to Ukraine via bilateral channels</td><td>EU Ammunition Production Act alignment <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ericsson</strong> (dual-use)</td><td>5G/critical comms</td><td>Partial exit from Russia 2022; Ukraine comms re-entry</td><td>Reconstruction-phase telecom infrastructure <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>SSAB</strong></td><td>Armour-grade steel (Hardox, Armox)</td><td>Base-material supplier to armour manufacturers</td><td>Reconstruction industrial base <code>[LOW]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Reconstruction-market comparative</strong>: Sweden's defence-industrial base is <strong>mid-tier in absolute terms</strong> (smaller than Germany's Rheinmetall/KMW, UK's BAE, France's Thales/Dassault) but <strong>top-tier in per-capita terms</strong> (comparable to Israel in technology-intensity). HD03231's founding-member signalling improves Saab/BAE Bofors/Nammo competitive positioning against Korean, Turkish, and Polish competitors in the same segment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-run-comparative-alignment">🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-run-comparative-alignment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-run-comparative-alignment">🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-run-comparative-alignment"></a></h3>
 <p>This comparative-international file aligns with and cites:</p>
 
 
@@ -4368,12 +4368,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-run-comparative-alignment">🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignmen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling run</th><th>Comparative file</th><th>Alignment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>realtime-1434/comparative-international.md</code></td><td>Nuremberg → Hague → Stockholm timeline</td><td>This dossier extends with <strong>Baltic-peer targeting convergence</strong> analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>monthly-review/comparative-international.md</code> (2026-04-19)</td><td>30-day Nordic + EU benchmarking</td><td>This dossier sharpens for the <strong>Russia/cyber/defence</strong> cluster</td></tr><tr><td><code>weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code> (2026-04-18)</td><td>Week-16 Nordic economic + defence snapshot</td><td>Confirms the 2024 economic baselines used in Section 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-2"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md">Scenario Analysis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 · <strong>Data freshness</strong>: World Bank WDI 2024 edition · SIPRI 2024 edition · NATO 2024–25 expenditure reports</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4405,7 +4405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:35 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>political-classification-guide; Riksdagsmonitor policy-domain taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification">🏷️ Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification">🏷️ Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4437,7 +4437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification">🏷️ Document Classification<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Type</th><th align="center">Committee (Receiving)</th><th>Policy Domains</th><th align="center">Priority Tier</th><th align="center">Retention</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td><td align="center">Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td><td>Foreign policy; International law; Security/Defence; Ukraine</td><td align="center"><strong>Tier 1 — Critical</strong></td><td align="center">7 years</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:232)</td><td align="center">Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td><td>Foreign policy; International law; Ukraine; Reparations</td><td align="center"><strong>Tier 1 — Critical</strong></td><td align="center">7 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--policy-domain-classification">📚 Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--policy-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">📚 Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4487,7 +4487,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--policy-domain-classification">📚 Policy Domain Classification<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th align="center">Primary/Secondary</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Committee</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>International Criminal Law</strong></td><td align="center">PRIMARY</td><td>Special Tribunal founding; aggression crime jurisdiction</td><td align="center">UU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Foreign Policy</strong></td><td align="center">PRIMARY</td><td>Sweden's international commitments; NATO context; CoE EPA</td><td align="center">UU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security and Defence</strong></td><td align="center">PRIMARY</td><td>Russian hybrid threat elevation; SÄPO/NCSC mandate</td><td align="center">FöU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rule of Law / Human Rights</strong></td><td align="center">SECONDARY</td><td>Accountability for war crimes; ICL norms</td><td align="center">KU (adjacent)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finance / Budget</strong></td><td align="center">TERTIARY</td><td>EPA assessed dues (SEK 30-80M/year)</td><td align="center">FiU (adjacent)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Affairs</strong></td><td align="center">SECONDARY</td><td>EU foreign-policy alignment; EEAS coordination</td><td align="center">EUN (adjacent)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--access-classification">🔒 Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--access-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-access-classification">🔒 Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4511,7 +4511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--access-classification">🔒 Access Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>PUBLIC</strong></td><td>HD03231 is a tabled Riksdag proposition — publicly available</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis sensitivity</strong></td><td>MEDIUM — security analysis of threat escalation contains operational information that should be handled carefully</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Distribution</strong></td><td>Open publication on Riksdagsmonitor; defence/security caveats noted in article</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-committee-routing">🏛️ Committee Routing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-committee-routing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-routing">🏛️ Committee Routing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-routing"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4549,7 +4549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-committee-routing">🏛️ Committee Routing<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Committee</th><th align="center">Expected Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Primary review</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Advisory review</strong></td><td>Försvarsutskottet (FöU)</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Budget impact</strong></td><td>Finansutskottet (FiU) — if dues require appropriation</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>First Riksdag vote</strong></td><td>Kammaren</td><td align="center">Q3-Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Second vote (post-election)</strong></td><td>Kammaren (new composition)</td><td align="center">Q1-Q2 2027</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--content-classification-labels">📊 Content Classification Labels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--content-classification-labels"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-content-classification-labels">📊 Content Classification Labels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-content-classification-labels"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4581,7 +4581,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--content-classification-labels">📊 Content Classification Labels<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Label</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Topic tags</strong></td><td>Ukraine; Russia; International Criminal Law; Special Tribunal; Aggression; Nuremberg; Security; Hybrid Warfare; Cyber; Defence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Named entities</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard; Ulf Kristersson; Vladimir Putin; Volodymyr Zelensky; Valery Gerasimov; Council of Europe; Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Geographic scope</strong></td><td>Sweden; Ukraine; Russia; The Hague; European Union; Global</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Time horizon</strong></td><td>Immediate (ratification 2026-27); Medium (tribunal operational 2027-28); Long-term (prosecution 2028+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4613,7 +4613,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>XRF-ID</strong></td><td>XRF-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:36 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>Cross-document intelligence map; reference ecosystem</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-relationships">🔗 Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-relationships"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationships">🔗 Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationships"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     HD03231["📜 HD03231&#x3C;br/>Prop. 2025/26:231&#x3C;br/>Ukraine Aggression Tribunal&#x3C;br/>2026-04-16"]
     HD03232["📜 HD03232&#x3C;br/>Prop. 2025/26:232&#x3C;br/>International Compensation&#x3C;br/>Commission (Ukraine)&#x3C;br/>2026-04-16"]
@@ -4662,7 +4662,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-relationships">🔗 Document Relationships<a class="" aria-
     style COE_EPA fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style NATO_ART5 fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--reference-documents--citations">📚 Reference Documents &#x26; Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--reference-documents--citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-documents--citations">📚 Reference Documents &#x26; Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-documents--citations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4724,7 +4724,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--reference-documents--citations">📚 Reference Documents &#x26; Cita
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reference</th><th>Type</th><th>Relevance to HD03231</th><th align="center">Access</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></td><td>Prior AI analysis (L2+)</td><td>Gold-standard per-document analysis; this deep-inspection upgrades to L3</td><td align="center">Local</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md</code></td><td>Prior threat analysis</td><td>T6 (Russian hybrid) at MEDIUM-HIGH/HIGH first established here</td><td align="center">Local</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>Prior synthesis</td><td>HD03231 as "Secondary" in realtime-1434; now LEAD in deep-inspection</td><td align="center">Local</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf">ICC Rome Statute Art. 8bis</a></td><td>International treaty</td><td>Defines "crime of aggression"; Special Tribunal fills gap where ICC cannot act</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.coe.int">Council of Europe EPA framework</a></td><td>Institutional framework</td><td>HD03231 ratifies Sweden's accession to EPA structure</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.rscsl.org">SCSL Statute (2002)</a></td><td>Precedent</td><td>Hybrid international tribunal design; in absentia procedures</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.nato.int">NATO Art. 5 (Washington Treaty)</a></td><td>Strategic context</td><td>Sweden's collective-defence anchor; changes threat calculus</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.msb.se">MSB Hotbildsanalys 2025</a></td><td>Security context</td><td>Current Swedish security posture vs Russian hybrid threats</td><td align="center">External</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-evolution-tracking">🔄 Document Evolution Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-evolution-tracking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-evolution-tracking">🔄 Document Evolution Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-evolution-tracking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4750,7 +4750,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-evolution-tracking">🔄 Document Evolution Tracking<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Version</th><th>Date</th><th align="center">Analysis Depth</th><th>Key Changes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Initial analysis</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">L2+ Strategic</td><td>Security dimensions identified; T6 flagged MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Deep-inspection</strong></td><td><strong>2026-04-19</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>L3 Intelligence Grade</strong></td><td>Full Kill Chain; Diamond Model; Attack Tree; 8-stakeholder SWOT; risk scored 20/25 for R1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map">🌐 Related Swedish Foreign Policy Instruments (Context Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map">🌐 Related Swedish Foreign Policy Instruments (Context Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4788,7 +4788,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map">🌐 Related
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Instrument</th><th>Date</th><th>Relationship to HD03231</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>NATO accession</strong></td><td>March 2024</td><td>Security anchor; changes Russia threat calculus for HD03231 targeting</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine aid package</strong> (annual)</td><td>2022–2026</td><td>Policy continuity; HD03231 is legal-institutional complement to aid</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232 (Reparations Commission)</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Companion proposition; EUR 260B immobilised Russian assets framework</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish humanitarian aid to Ukraine</strong></td><td>2022–2026</td><td>Humanitarian track; HD03231 is accountability track</td></tr><tr><td><strong>GDPR/UD data protection</strong></td><td>Ongoing</td><td>UD data security is now relevant to tribunal planning security</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4819,7 +4819,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 <p>This file is the self-audit for the first <code>deep-inspection</code> run designated to carry the <strong>Tier-C 14-artifact reference-grade requirement</strong>. All prior deep-inspection runs (2026-04-03, 2026-04-15) produced the 9-core-artifact set only; this run is the first to cross the 14-artifact threshold after explicit PR reviewer guidance on 2026-04-19 (see PR comment 4276581622).</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scope-of-this-reflection">🎯 Scope of This Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scope-of-this-reflection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scope-of-this-reflection">🎯 Scope of This Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scope-of-this-reflection"></a></h3>
 <p>This reflection audits <strong>both</strong> the agentic workflow that produced the run (news-article-generator.md with deep-inspection article_types parameter) <strong>and</strong> the analytic tradecraft inside the resulting package. Findings are categorised as:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>✅ Preserve</strong> — worked well, should be propagated via codification</li>
@@ -4827,25 +4827,25 @@ <h2 id="rm--scope-of-this-reflection">🎯 Scope of This Reflection<a class="" a
 <li><strong>🔴 Systemic</strong> — requires a workflow-level or methodology-level change</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held">1. Focus-Topic Alignment Gate (existing rule held)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held">1. Focus-Topic Alignment Gate (existing rule held)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held"></a></h4>
 <p>The pre-existing <code>focus_topic</code> gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"DEEP-INSPECTION TOPIC-DATA ALIGNMENT GATE") correctly prevented drift. <code>focus_topic="Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraina"</code> matched HD03231 primary content — gate passed → article generation proceeded correctly. <strong>No 2026-04-15 "cyber article from migration data" anti-pattern repeat</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Already codified; retain as-is. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing">2. Sibling-Run Cross-Referencing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing">2. Sibling-Run Cross-Referencing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing"></a></h4>
 <p>The baseline synthesis correctly cited <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code> as reference dossier, inheriting R1 Bayesian prior (16/25 weighted for Russian hybrid retaliation) and upgrading it to 20/25 based on HD03231-specific factors (founding-member visibility, security-silence in the proposition text). This is the pattern that Tier-C §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation" requires.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Make sibling-run citations MANDATORY for all deep-inspection runs. Add to news-article-generator.md §"Step 1.5" as a 🔴 blocking gate: every deep-inspection run MUST cite ≥ 1 sibling run from the prior 7 days (weekly-review, realtime-monitor, or another deep-inspection). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file">3. Per-Document L3 Analysis File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file">3. Per-Document L3 Analysis File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file"></a></h4>
 <p><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code> (178 lines, 14 KB) contained 6-lens analysis, STRIDE, evidence table, and forward indicators. This is the L3 intelligence-grade depth tier the methodology calls for.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Retain L3 standard; document the evidence-count minima (≥ 3 evidence points per claim) already in template. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting">4. Security-Lens Significance Re-Weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting">4. Security-Lens Significance Re-Weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting"></a></h4>
 <p>The synthesis-summary applied a security-specific weighting that elevated HD03231 from raw 9 → weighted 11.5/10 (exceeding the raw-ceiling by design to reflect the pronounced security-lens significance). This honoured the focus_topic without fabricating news value.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Document the "Security-Lens Weighting v1.0" multipliers in <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 5 as a recognised companion to the DIW v1.0 framework. <code>[MEDIUM-HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage">5. Color-Coded Mermaid Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage">5. Color-Coded Mermaid Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage"></a></h4>
 <p>Every one of the 9 initial artifacts contained ≥ 1 color-coded Mermaid diagram with real dok_ids and actor names. Extended Tier-C files (README, executive-brief, scenario-analysis, comparative-international, methodology-reflection) add another 3–5 diagrams to the package.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Already a mandatory standard; retain. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4888,7 +4888,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Note on manifest retrofit</strong>: This manifest is the retrofit data-provenance file added during the Tier-C reference-grade upgrade (2026-04-19 post-review). The downstream analyses in this package were already built on the documented MCP queries below; this file formalises the chain-of-custody.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4956,7 +4956,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>MCP Tool</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Count</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdag propositioner (2025/26)</td><td><code>get_propositioner({rm: "2025/26"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232 retrieved</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag document by ID</td><td><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD03231"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Full text + metadata fetched</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag document by ID</td><td><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD03232"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Companion (reparations commission)</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag committee calendar</td><td><code>get_calendar_events({from: "2026-04-19", tom: "2026-06-30", org: "UU"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">UU agenda for tribunal processing</td></tr><tr><td>Regering press releases</td><td><code>search_regering({query: "tribunal ukraina", dateFrom: "2026-04-15", dateTo: "2026-04-19"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">2 press releases (UD)</td></tr><tr><td>Government document content</td><td><code>get_g0v_document_content(...)</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">UD tribunal framework press release</td></tr><tr><td>Sync status</td><td><code>get_sync_status({})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Status: live; last sync fresh</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data</td><td><code>get-economic-data({countryCode:"SE",...})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">GDP growth, inflation, defence % GDP</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data</td><td>Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI)</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Defence spending, FDI net inflows</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--primary-documents-retrieved">📄 Primary Documents Retrieved<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--primary-documents-retrieved"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-documents-retrieved">📄 Primary Documents Retrieved<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-documents-retrieved"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4999,7 +4999,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--primary-documents-retrieved">📄 Primary Documents Retrieved<a clas
 <li>Companion fiscal/legal measure without direct security vector → ×1.00 baseline</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain">🧭 Reference Analyses (Cross-Run Evidence Chain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain">🧭 Reference Analyses (Cross-Run Evidence Chain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain"></a></h3>
 <p>This deep-inspection package builds on and explicitly cites the following sibling runs within the 72-hour lookback window:</p>
 
 
@@ -5038,7 +5038,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain">🧭 Reference Analyses
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling Run</th><th>Files Used</th><th>Evidence Carried Forward</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>risk-assessment.md</code> (R1 = 16/25 Russian hybrid retaliation), <code>threat-analysis.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Gold-standard HD03231 strategic framing; baseline R1 Bayesian prior</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> (Week 16), <code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td>Week-16 lead-story decision hierarchy; HD01UFöU3 NATO eFP deployment context (1,200 troops to Finland)</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, <code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td>30-day forward vote calendar; watchpoint reconciliation baseline</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td>30-day retrospective; benchmark exemplar for Tier-C scaling</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-15/deep-inspection/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>Prior deep-inspection structural template</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-excluded-scope-control">🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Control)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-excluded-scope-control"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-excluded-scope-control">🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Control)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-excluded-scope-control"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5070,7 +5070,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-excluded-scope-control">🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Con
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>Covered by realtime-1434 (constitutional package); off-topic for Russia/cyber focus</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Spring fiscal trilogy — covered in week-16 review</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Juvenile-offender package — off-topic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Migration trio — off-topic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>Housing/AML — off-topic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--world-bank-economic-context-captured">📊 World Bank Economic Context (Captured)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--world-bank-economic-context-captured"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-world-bank-economic-context-captured">📊 World Bank Economic Context (Captured)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-world-bank-economic-context-captured"></a></h3>
 <p>Stored in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/economic-data.json"><code>economic-data.json</code></a>. Indicators matched to detected policy domains (defence, foreign affairs, hybrid threat):</p>
 
 
@@ -5119,7 +5119,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--world-bank-economic-context-captured">📊 World Bank Economic Conte
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">SE 2024</th><th align="center">DK 2024</th><th align="center">NO 2024</th><th align="center">FI 2024</th><th>Usage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP growth (% annual)</td><td align="center">0.82 %</td><td align="center">3.50 %</td><td align="center">2.10 %</td><td align="center">1.04 %</td><td>Economic-resilience baseline for sanctions absorption</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation (CPI, % annual)</td><td align="center">2.836 %</td><td align="center">1.95 %</td><td align="center">3.58 %</td><td align="center">1.28 %</td><td>Hybrid-war narrative sensitivity</td></tr><tr><td>Military expenditure (% GDP)</td><td align="center">≥ 2.0 % (NATO target)</td><td align="center">2.37 %</td><td align="center">2.23 %</td><td align="center">2.41 %</td><td>Defence posture context for tribunal signalling</td></tr><tr><td>FDI net inflows ($)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Economic-retaliation exposure baseline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-freshness--staleness-rules">🕐 Data Freshness &#x26; Staleness Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-freshness--staleness-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-freshness--staleness-rules">🕐 Data Freshness &#x26; Staleness Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness--staleness-rules"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03231 publication date</strong>: 2026-04-16 (Regeringen)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03231 tabling in Riksdag</strong>: 2026-04-16 (seriously close to this analysis — 3 days)</li>
@@ -5128,7 +5128,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-freshness--staleness-rules">🕐 Data Freshness &#x26; Stalenes
 <li><strong>Validity window</strong>: Until 2026-05-03 (earliest Utrikesutskottet betänkande window) or event-driven refresh (Lagrådet yttrande, SÄPO threat-bulletin update)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5176,7 +5176,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custod
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Step</th><th>Tool / Responsible</th><th align="center">Timestamp (UTC)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MCP health gate + <code>get_sync_status</code></td><td>agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:18</td></tr><tr><td>Document query batch (HD03231, HD03232)</td><td>agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:20</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data fetch</td><td>agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:24</td></tr><tr><td>Per-file analysis (HD03231-analysis.md L3)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:30–18:40</td></tr><tr><td>9-core artifact synthesis</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:40–18:52</td></tr><tr><td>Tier-C reference-grade upgrade (this version)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7 (post-review session)</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 19:00+</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-reference to sibling runs (realtime-1434, weekly-review, month-ahead)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 19:10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quality-gates-applied">🧪 Quality Gates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quality-gates-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-gates-applied">🧪 Quality Gates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-gates-applied"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ 9-Artifact Completeness Gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"9 REQUIRED Analysis Artifacts")</li>
 <li>✅ Tier-C 14-Artifact Gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"14 REQUIRED Artifacts for AGGREGATION Workflows" — extended to <code>deep-inspection</code> 2026-04-19)</li>
@@ -5189,6 +5189,24 @@ <h2 id="rm--quality-gates-applied">🧪 Quality Gates Applied<a class="" aria-hi
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 or event-driven · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -5227,7 +5245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:03.199Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:24.575Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html b/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html
index 27358c6d87..e36a396841 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Deep Inspection HD03231 (Russia · Cyber · Defence · Ukraine)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.449Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:24.853Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.449Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:24.853Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Deep Inspection HD03231 (Russia · Cyber · Defence · Ukraine)","description":"On 2026-04-16 Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) and PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled Proposition 2025/26:231 (HD03231) proposing Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:03.449Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/hd03231.json","name":"documents/hd03231.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Deep Inspection HD03231 (Russia · Cyber · Defence · Ukraine)","description":"On 2026-04-16 Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) and PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled Proposition 2025/26:231 (HD03231) proposing Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:24.853Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-deep-inspection-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/hd03231.json","name":"documents/hd03231.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, foreign-policy desks, cyber-defence advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -240,10 +240,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, cyber-defence posture, or procurement decision citing HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs (SÄPO/NCSC posture) · Q2–Q3 2026 (Riksdag vote) · H1 2027 (tribunal operational)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-article-generator deep-inspection (Copilot Opus 4.7)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Ceiling</strong></td><td>HIGH on tribunal legal effects; MEDIUM on Russian-response timing; LOW on US-cooperation trajectory</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>On 2026-04-16 Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) and PM Ulf Kristersson (M) tabled Proposition 2025/26:231 (<code>HD03231</code>) proposing Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine — the first dedicated aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg (1945–46) and the first criminal court ever to have jurisdiction over the act of starting a war of aggression against a P5-shielded state.</strong> Because HD03231 binds Sweden constitutionally to a Russia-accountability track, it qualitatively elevates Sweden's adversary-threat classification in Russian services' targeting taxonomy — from "Ukraine supporter" to "founding judicial-accountability actor". The 24 months following ratification carry <strong>elevated APT29 (SVR) and GRU Sandworm retaliatory-cyber probability against UD, NCSC, Riksdag IT, and Baltic-undersea-cable infrastructure</strong>, compounding the residual NATO-accession threat wave (March 2024) rather than substituting for it. HD03231 is completely silent on the operational-security requirements of founding membership — <strong>the critical policy gap is not the tribunal itself but the absent SÄPO/NCSC/MSB mandate-expansion package that should accompany it</strong>. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cyber-defence posture elevation (UD/NCSC/Riksdag IT)</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> Kill-Chain §3 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R1 = 20/25</td><td align="right">Immediate · before first Riksdag vote</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead-story framing (security-lens vs legal-historical lens)</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Security-Weighted · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Lead-Story Assessment</td><td align="right">Pre-publication</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Defence-industry engagement posture (Saab/BAE Bofors/Nammo)</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §Business · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> O3</td><td align="right">Q2–Q3 2026 procurement cycle</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03231 crosses a qualitative threshold in Swedish threat exposure.</strong> The transition from Ukraine-supporter to founding-tribunal-member is the category change that Russian services use to reclassify targets. Historical precedent: ICC staff, systems, and Dutch host infrastructure were targeted by APT29 after the March 2023 Putin arrest warrant. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional irreversibility is the security-relevant asymmetry.</strong> Unlike arms deliveries (reversible) or sanctions (negotiable), founding membership under a Council of Europe EPA binds Sweden indefinitely — which is both a credible deterrent and a permanent targeting justification. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Defence-industry window.</strong> Saab AB (Gripen E/F, Carl-Gustaf M4, AT4), BAE Systems Bofors (Archer SPH, BONUS), and Nammo (small/medium munitions) gain a sustained Ukraine-reconstruction and EU ReArm procurement signal. EUR 500 B+ reconstruction market is the concrete defence-industry upside. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch">🎭 Named Actors to Watch<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M, PM)</strong></td><td>Political owner of tribunal accession</td><td>Continuity of commitment across post-election cabinet transitions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M, FM)</strong></td><td>HD03231 architect</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; decides UD security posture under tribunal obligations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson (M, Defence Minister)</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten lead</td><td>HD01UFöU3 co-signatory; tribunal security-posture complement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carl-Oskar Bohlin (M, Civil-Defence Minister)</strong></td><td>MSB political lead</td><td>Hybrid-threat communication architecture owner</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Charlotte von Essen (SÄPO Director-General)</strong></td><td>Operational threat-response lead</td><td>Annual Hotbildsanalys (H1 2026) will be first post-HD03231 assessment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Åke Holmgren (MSB DG)</strong></td><td>Civil-contingencies lead</td><td>Responsible for MSB Hotbildsanalys 2026 update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson (S, party leader)</strong></td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Cross-party tribunal consensus — maintains if party discipline holds</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson (SD, party leader)</strong></td><td>Formerly Russia-sympathetic; now Ukraine-supporter</td><td>SD voting record on HD03231 is the diagnostic signal for realignment durability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong></td><td>Ukraine President</td><td>Hague Convention Dec 16 2025 co-signatory; political owner of the accountability architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional review</td><td>Yttrande on HD03231 — timing and findings affect committee tempo</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Utrikesutskottet (UU) chair</strong></td><td>Committee lead</td><td>Parliamentary processing pathway; the formal betänkande will carry security-posture references or not</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar">🔮 Next 90 Days — What to Watch (Forward Calendar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar">🔮 Next 90 Days — What to Watch (Forward Calendar)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--next-90-days--what-to-watch-forward-calendar">🔮 Next 90 Days —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Q2 2026 (May)</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on HD03231</td><td>Bayesian update on R1: if silent on security implications ⇒ R1 confirmed at 20/25; if flagged ⇒ R1 ↓ 2-3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jun–Jul 2026</strong></td><td><strong>Utrikesutskottet betänkande</strong> on HD03231</td><td>Committee record — will security gap be remediated via reservations?</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jun 2026</strong></td><td>SÄPO annual <em>Hotbildsanalys</em> (2026 edition)</td><td>Will HD03231 appear as a <strong>new</strong> threat-factor line item? First post-tribunal doctrine statement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2 2026 (continuous)</strong></td><td>MSB <em>Hotbildsanalys</em> update</td><td>Russian hybrid-threat posture baseline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2–Q3 2026</strong></td><td>NCSC cyber-bulletin frequency spike against UD/tribunal-adjacent targets</td><td>Early-warning signal for Russian cyber response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Continuous</strong></td><td>Baltic undersea cable incidents (SE-FI, SE-DE, SE-PL, Nord Stream shadow)</td><td>Correlation with HD03231 timeline strengthens Russian-attribution case</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sep 13 2026</strong></td><td><strong>Swedish general election (riksdagsval)</strong></td><td>Post-election composition → second-reading viability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sep–Nov 2026</strong></td><td><strong>Valrörelse-window Russian disinformation intensification</strong></td><td>Peak hybrid-influence period overlapping second-reading window</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>First Riksdag kammarvote on HD03231</td><td>First reading — SD position diagnostic</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H1 2027</strong></td><td>Tribunal operations commence (expected)</td><td>Threat curve steepens as first indictments approach</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2027</strong></td><td>First tribunal indictments (projected)</td><td>Russian response escalates to operational tier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tribunal legal architecture effects (EPA structure, jurisdiction)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Direct legal-doctrinal reading</td></tr><tr><td>Russian cyber-retaliation probability elevation</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Consistent with documented APT29/GRU targeting of ICC post-Putin-warrant and ICJ post-South-Africa-genocide-filing</td></tr><tr><td>Russian cyber-retaliation timing (24–36 mo)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Historic lag between announcement and operational response is 6–18 months</td></tr><tr><td>SD voting position on first reading</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong></td><td>Current SD posture is Ukraine-supportive; post-NATO realignment appears durable but not certain</td></tr><tr><td>US (Trump-era 47th admin) cooperation posture</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; veto/non-cooperation possible; no hard signal yet</td></tr><tr><td>Defence-industry benefit magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Saab Gripen E/F export pipeline strong; reconstruction procurement timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario probabilities (base / wildcard bands)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>42 % base case; wide CI on high-impact wildcards</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO/NCSC mandate-expansion uptake</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM-LOW</strong></td><td>Political will for mid-cycle budget expansion uncertain; Defence Commission 2025 had no post-tribunal rider</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations">🧩 What This Brief Does NOT Tell You (Known Limitations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations">🧩 What This Brief Does NOT Tell You (Known Limitations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Does not quantify Russian-asset exposure of specific Swedish firms</strong> — Saab civil, Volvo, Ericsson, Nordea Baltics figures are first-order estimates only; a dedicated economic-risk annex would be required for trading desks.</li>
 <li><strong>Does not map the full Council of Europe EPA member-state consensus</strong> — 40+ states; the political dynamics inside the Committee of Ministers are summarised but not analysed at depth.</li>
@@ -480,12 +480,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-this-brief-does-not-tell-you-known-limitations">🧩 What This
 <li><strong>Does not forecast 2027+ tribunal docket composition</strong> — which defendants, in which sequence, under which jurisdictional gateway is beyond a 90-day horizon.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md">Data Manifest</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md">HD03231 L3 analysis</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 or event-driven (Lagrådet yttrande, SÄPO bulletin, Baltic cable incident)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SYN-ID</strong></td><td>SYN-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Run</strong></td><td>news-article-generator deep-inspection</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:18 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-article-generator (Copilot Opus 4.7 — per workflow <code>engine.model</code> in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/.github/workflows/news-article-generator.md"><code>news-article-generator.md</code></a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodologies Applied</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1, political-swot-framework, political-risk-methodology, political-threat-framework, STRIDE, Kill-Chain Adaptation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Documents</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231 — Ukraine Aggression Tribunal)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reference Analyses</strong></td><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/ (gold-standard dossier)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus Topic</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraine — security dimensions of HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Freshness</strong></td><td>HD03231 tabled 2026-04-16 — FRESH (3 days old)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>1 primary (HD03231) + 1 companion (HD03232) + reference dossier (6 docs)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Depth</strong></td><td>L3 — Intelligence Grade (deep-inspection tier)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Proposition 2025/26:231 (<code>HD03231</code>) formally proposes accession to the <strong>Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA) for the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine</strong> — the first criminal tribunal established to prosecute the crime of aggression since the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (1945–46). Tabled by Foreign Minister <strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> and PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> on 2026-04-16, the proposition places Sweden as a <strong>founding member</strong> of an institution directly targeting <strong>Russian political and military leadership</strong> for the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.</p>
 <p>From the <strong>Russia, cyber threat, and defence</strong> analytical lens, this action triggers four analytically distinct but interconnected security consequences:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Strategic irreversibility and deterrence value</strong>: Unlike policy commitments (arms deliveries, aid packages), founding membership in an international tribunal is <strong>constitutionally binding</strong> and institutionally resistant to reversal. This is the security-relevant asymmetry: the commitment mechanism is stronger than Russia's ability to coerce reversal through below-threshold hybrid operations. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Russia/hybrid threat</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cyber threat to Sweden</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Defence implications</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>International criminal law</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral/domestic</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Recommended framing for publication</strong>: The security-dimension story is the <strong>most underreported angle</strong> — most coverage focuses on the legal-historical Nuremberg frame. The deep-inspection value-add is the <strong>threat intelligence perspective</strong>: what does founding membership mean for Sweden's threat posture, and how does it integrate with post-NATO security architecture?</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-lead-document-hd03231">🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-lead-document-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-document-hd03231">🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-document-hd03231"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-lead-document-hd03231">🏛️ Lead Document: HD03231<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dok ID</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td><em>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Companion</strong></td><td>HD03232 (Reparations Commission — Prop. 2025/26:232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Department</strong></td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Responsible Minister</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) — Foreign Minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9/10</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td>L3 Intelligence Grade (deep-inspection)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security Classification</strong></td><td>PUBLIC but HIGH strategic sensitivity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-intelligence-map">🗺️ Document Intelligence Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-intelligence-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-intelligence-map">🗺️ Document Intelligence Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-intelligence-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph CORE["🎯 HD03231 — Core Document"]
         DOC["Prop. 2025/26:231&#x3C;br/>Ukraine Aggression Tribunal&#x3C;br/>2026-04-16"]
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-intelligence-map">🗺️ Document Intelligence Map<a cl
     style ICC_GAP fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF
     style SCSL fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline">📅 Chronological Framework — HD03231 Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline">📅 Chronological Framework — HD03231 Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -775,8 +775,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--chronological-framework--hd03231-timeline">📅 Chronological Framew
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feb 24 2022</strong></td><td>Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine</td><td>Trigger event</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Feb 2022+</strong></td><td>Sweden joins core working group on aggression tribunal</td><td>Foundational role established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mar 2024</strong></td><td>Sweden joins NATO (Article 5)</td><td>Security anchor — changes threat calculus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mar 2026</strong></td><td>Sweden signs letter of intent as founding member</td><td>Pre-accession commitment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Apr 16 2026</strong></td><td>Riksdag proposition HD03231 tabled</td><td><strong>This document</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2–Q3 2026</strong></td><td>Committee review (Utrikesutskottet)</td><td>Parliamentary processing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sep 2026</strong></td><td>General Election (Riksdag val)</td><td>Political context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>Projected Riksdag kammar vote (first reading)</td><td>Constitutional authorisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H1 2027</strong></td><td>Tribunal operations commence</td><td>Operational activation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2027+</strong></td><td>First docket opens — potential indictments</td><td>Putin/Gerasimov accountability trigger</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231">🎖️ Strategic Assessment: Security Implications of HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture">Why HD03231 Elevates Sweden's Threat Posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231">🎖️ Strategic Assessment: Security Implications of HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-assessment-security-implications-of-hd03231"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture">Why HD03231 Elevates Sweden's Threat Posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>HD03231 is not just a legal document — it is a strategic signal of permanent adversarial positioning toward Russia's leadership.</strong> Unlike arms deliveries (which can be wound down) or sanctions (which have diplomatic exit ramps), founding membership in a criminal tribunal targeting Putin, Gerasimov, and Shoigu by name (effectively) is <strong>institutionally irreversible</strong> under international law once ratified.</p>
 <p>Russia's FSB/GRU threat calculus will process HD03231 through three analytical frames:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-why-hd03231-elevates-swedens-threat-posture">Why HD03231 Elevates Swe
 <p><strong>Escalation signal</strong>: Sweden has crossed from "supporter" to "founder" — a qualitative threshold in Russian threat-actor classification. This maps to increased probability of Tier 2 (cyber) and Tier 3 (infrastructure/supply chain) operations.</p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit">Russia's Likely Response Toolkit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit">Russia's Likely Response Toolkit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -848,17 +848,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-russias-likely-response-toolkit">Russia's Likely Response Toolkit<a c
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Response Type</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Target</th><th align="center">Attribution Challenge</th><th>Deterrent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Disinformation</strong> — valrörelse-targeted</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Swedish public opinion, SD voters</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>MSB/StratCom</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cyber ops</strong> — governmental IT</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>UD, Riksdag, NCSC</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>NCSC hardening</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Phishing</strong> — diplomat/official targeting</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>UD officials, tribunal staff</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>GovCERT</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Infrastructure sabotage</strong> — Baltic cables</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Undersea cables (SE-FI, SE-DE)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>NATO MARCOM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic retaliation</strong> — SE firms in Russia</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Saab (civil), Volvo, Ericsson</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>EU sanctions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Proxy information operations</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Pro-Russia domestic voices</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Digital literacy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><code>[HIGH confidence on disinformation trajectory; MEDIUM confidence on cyber/physical targeting probability]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5w-deep-analysis">5W Deep Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5w-deep-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-who">WHO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-who"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5w-deep-analysis">5W Deep Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5w-deep-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-who">WHO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-who"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary actors</strong>: PM Ulf Kristersson (M) and FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) as authors and political owners. Sweden as founding member joins approximately 40+ Council of Europe member states in the EPA framework. The tribunal itself will ultimately target Russian President Vladimir Putin, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu (now Security Council Secretary), and CJGS Valery Gerasimov.</p>
 <p><strong>Affected stakeholders</strong>: SÄPO (Swedish Security Police) — operational response; MSB (Civil Contingencies Agency) — hybrid threat; NCSC (National Cyber Security Centre) — cyber defence; Försvarsmakten — military intelligence; Swedish companies in Russia (Saab civil div, Volvo, Ericsson, IKEA legacy) — economic retaliation exposure; Ukrainian diaspora in Sweden (~50,000) — judicial representation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-what">WHAT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-what">WHAT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden becomes a <strong>founding member</strong> of the world's first dedicated tribunal for the crime of aggression since Nuremberg. The tribunal operates under a <strong>Council of Europe Expanded Partial Agreement</strong> — a legal innovation circumventing UNSC deadlock (Russia's veto blocks ICC aggression jurisdiction over P5 members). Sweden commits to: EPA membership dues (est. SEK 30–80M annually), full cooperation with tribunal subpoenas and evidence requests, extradition regime activation (no immunity for accused).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-when">WHEN<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-when"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-when">WHEN<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-when"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Immediate</strong> (Apr 2026): Proposition tabled; SÄPO/NCSC posture should be assessed now. <strong>Q2-Q3 2026</strong>: Committee review and first Riksdag vote. <strong>Sep 2026</strong>: Swedish election — second reading timing post-election. <strong>H1 2027</strong>: Tribunal opens; Russian response escalates to operational phase.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-where">WHERE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where">WHERE<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal</strong>: The Hague, Netherlands — tribunal seat. <strong>Political</strong>: Stockholm — Riksdag vote; Brussels — EU foreign-policy coordination. <strong>Operational</strong>: Sweden's CNI (governmental IT, energy grid, telecommunications, undersea cables in Baltic Sea). <strong>Strategic</strong>: Global norm-setting for ICL accountability outside UNSC.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-why">WHY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-why">WHY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Legal</strong>: Fills the "aggression gap" in the ICC Rome Statute (Kampala 2017 amendments exclude P5 members from ICC aggression jurisdiction without their consent)</li>
 <li><strong>Strategic</strong>: Irreversibly commits Sweden to Russian accountability track — insurance against future Western wavering</li>
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-why">WHY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why"><
 <li><strong>Security</strong>: NATO framework requires Sweden to align on collective defence commitments; tribunal co-founding is the diplomatic complement to Article 5</li>
 <li><strong>Historical</strong>: Genuine Nuremberg framing — Sweden positions as norm-entrepreneur in the 21st-century iteration of post-WWII order construction</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-winners--losers">WINNERS &#x26; LOSERS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-winners--losers">WINNERS &#x26; LOSERS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-winners--losers">WINNERS &#x26; LOSERS<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Outcome</th><th>Mechanism</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky government)</strong></td><td align="center">🏆 WIN</td><td>Founding member secured; accountability mechanism operational</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish diplomatic corps (UD)</strong></td><td align="center">🏆 WIN</td><td>International standing, tribunal leadership roles</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish defence industry (Saab, BAE Bofors)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ NET POSITIVE</td><td>Ukraine relationship deepens procurement; tribunal signals sustained engagement</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO/NCSC/MSB</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 INCREASED MANDATE</td><td>Elevated threat = elevated budget justification</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish civil society (Amnesty, Civil Rights Defenders)</strong></td><td align="center">🏆 WIN</td><td>Accountability mandate fulfilled</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (Putin/Kremlin)</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 LOSS</td><td>Accountability mechanism directly targeting leadership</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish firms in Russia</strong></td><td align="center">🔴 EXPOSURE</td><td>Potential retaliation target (asset freezes, market exclusion)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD voters (Russia-adjacent)</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 NEUTRAL-NEGATIVE</td><td>Tribunal forces SD to maintain Ukraine-support position</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Global South states</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 MIXED</td><td>Some see positive accountability norm; others see Western selectivity</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Monitoring Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Monitoring Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-monitoring-triggers">🔮 Forward Indicators (Mon
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Significance</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SÄPO annual threat report (2026 edition)</td><td>H1 2026</td><td>Will Sweden's tribunal role appear as new factor?</td><td>Read carefully</td></tr><tr><td>MSB Hotbildsanalys 2026</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Russian hybrid threat to Sweden updated assessment</td><td>Monitor</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic cable incident (Baltic Sea)</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Correlation with tribunal timeline = strong attribution signal</td><td>Escalate</td></tr><tr><td>NCSC cyber bulletin spike</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Increased phishing/intrusion attempts against UD</td><td>Response</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag vote on HD03231</td><td>Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>First reading — SD position diagnostic</td><td>Monitor</td></tr><tr><td>Trump administration position</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>US cooperation with tribunal affects effectiveness</td><td>Key risk</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal first indictment</td><td>H1–H2 2027</td><td>Russian response will escalate at this moment</td><td>Prepare</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SIG-ID</strong></td><td>SIG-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:34 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>DIW (Democratic-Impact Weighting) + security-significance multiplier</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber, defence, Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-matrix">📊 Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-matrix">📊 Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-matrix">📊 Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Raw Score (1-10)</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Weighted Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>News Value</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td>First tribunal since Nuremberg; founding-member status; historic global news</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Democratic Impact</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td>Parliamentary ratification required; treaty commitment; public significance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security Impact</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.2</td><td align="center">12.0</td><td>Elevates Russia threat posture; hybrid warfare trigger; cyber threat escalation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International Law</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td>Closes Nuremberg gap; first aggression tribunal since 1945; precedent-setting</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Domestic Politics</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">0.9</td><td align="center">6.3</td><td>Cross-party consensus reduces political drama; election-cycle timing adds interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Economic Impact</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">0.8</td><td align="center">4.0</td><td>Limited direct fiscal cost (SEK 30-80M/year); indirect economic implications</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strategic/Geopolitical</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1.1</td><td align="center">11.0</td><td>Norm-entrepreneurship; NATO-alignment; Ukraine negotiating leverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Long-term Durability</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td>Institutional commitment; constitutionally binding; irreversible once ratified</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Raw significance: 9/10 | Security-weighted significance: 11.5/10 (security dimension elevates above raw)</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ranked-significance-findings">🏆 Ranked Significance Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ranked-significance-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-significance-findings">🏆 Ranked Significance Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-significance-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ranked-significance-findings">🏆 Ranked Significance Findings<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Significance Level</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>First dedicated aggression tribunal since Nuremberg (1945-46)</strong> — Sweden as founding member of a historic ICL institution</td><td>HD03231 text; FM Stenergard press release; ICL historical record</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Sweden's threat posture permanently elevated vs Russia</strong> — founding membership in a tribunal targeting living Russian leadership creates durable targeting incentive for GRU/SVR/FSB</td><td>Risk R1 (score 20/25); threat T1-T4</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Closes the ICC aggression gap</strong> — Kampala 2017 amendments left UNSC P5 members practically immune from ICC aggression jurisdiction; the Special Tribunal fills this gap via CoE EPA architecture</td><td>ICC Rome Statute Art. 8bis; Kampala Review Conference; HD03231 legal framework</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Swedish defence industry positioning in Ukraine reconstruction</strong> — the tribunal signals Sweden's sustained commitment, enhancing Saab/Ericsson/Volvo competitive positioning for EUR 500B+ reconstruction market</td><td>WB/EBRD Ukraine reconstruction estimates; Swedish defence export record</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Russian disinformation will target Sweden's 2026 valrörelse</strong> specifically through tribunal-linked narratives — Ukraine fatigue, "endangers Sweden", cost arguments</td><td>Russian disinformation pattern analysis; MSB/StratCom assessments</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>NATO-CoE synergy</strong> — tribunal co-founding is the diplomatic complement to NATO Article 5 commitment; represents Sweden's "two-track" security architecture (military + legal accountability)</td><td>NATO framework; CoE EPA structure; HD03231 strategic framing</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Second reading timing (post-Sep 2026 election) is the critical vulnerability window</strong> — if Russian disinformation successfully shifts election composition toward Ukraine-fatigue parties, second reading faces uncertainty</td><td>RF 8 kap.; election cycle analysis; stakeholder positions</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis">🔍 Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">🔍 Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis">🔍 Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario Shift</th><th>Impact on Significance</th><th align="center">Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>US explicitly supports tribunal</td><td>+1.5 (reduces R2 risk; increases effectiveness)</td><td align="center">↑</td></tr><tr><td>Russia-Ukraine ceasefire before Riksdag vote</td><td>−2.0 (political urgency reduced)</td><td align="center">↓</td></tr><tr><td>Baltic cable incident pre-election</td><td>+1.0 (galvanises support; increases security salience)</td><td align="center">↑</td></tr><tr><td>NCSC announces UD-specific security hardening</td><td>−0.5 R3 risk (reduces vulnerability)</td><td align="center">↑ net positive</td></tr><tr><td>SD reversal on Ukraine support</td><td>−1.5 (second reading uncertainty increases)</td><td align="center">↓</td></tr><tr><td>First tribunal indictment (2027+)</td><td>+3.0 (political and security significance peaks)</td><td align="center">↑</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--publication-significance-assessment">📰 Publication Significance Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--publication-significance-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-significance-assessment">📰 Publication Significance Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-significance-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Publication Framing Priority</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Security dimension</strong> (most underreported, highest analytical value-add): What founding membership means for Sweden's threat posture — cyber, hybrid, disinformation vectors</li>
@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--publication-significance-assessment">📰 Publication Significance A
 <li>International observers of Swedish foreign policy</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>STK-ID</strong></td><td>STK-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:32 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>8-stakeholder political intelligence framework · Security-enhanced lens</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia/security dimensions + parliamentary actors</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-position-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-position-matrix">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-position-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-position-matrix">📊 Stakeholder Position Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">Power</th><th align="center">Interest</th><th align="center">HD03231 Position (−5/+5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government (M/KD/L)</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Kristersson + Stenergard co-sign; founding-member architects</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (parliamentary support)</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center"><strong>+3</strong></td><td>Nuremberg framing compatible; Ukraine support since 2022; populist Russia-hostility</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>S led 2022 Ukraine response; cross-party accountability consensus</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong></td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+3</strong></td><td>Accountability support; NATO-framing caution; ultimately pro-Ukraine</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>International law + human rights alignment; MP strong Ukraine support</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Liberal European internationalism; C strongly pro-Ukraine</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine (Zelensky government)</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Co-architect; Hague Convention Dec 2025 with Zelensky present</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia (Putin government)</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>−5</strong></td><td>Directly targeted; "unfriendly state" designation; hostile posture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO</strong></td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">Operational</td><td>Elevated threat mandate; increasing security responsibilities</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NCSC</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">Operational</td><td>Cyber defence mandate; APT monitoring escalation</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MSB</strong></td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">Operational</td><td>Civil defence against hybrid threats; MSB Hotbildsanalys</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Council of Europe</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Framework body; institutional architect</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU institutions</strong></td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>EU foreign-policy alignment; frozen assets architecture</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US administration</strong></td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center"><strong>0 to +2</strong></td><td>Historical ICC reluctance; tribunal-specific ambiguous</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab AB</strong></td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center"><strong>+3</strong></td><td>Defence relationship deepens; reconstruction positioning</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Amnesty Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td><td>Accountability mandate</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish public (SOM/Novus polling)</strong></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>+4</strong></td><td>60-70% Ukraine support since 2022; Nuremberg resonates</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-1-swedish-citizens--public">🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens &#x26; Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-1-swedish-citizens--public"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-swedish-citizens--public">🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens &#x26; Public<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-swedish-citizens--public"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position on HD03231</strong>: Strong public support. SOM Institute and Novus polling consistently show 60-70%+ Swedish public support for Ukraine aid and accountability since February 2022. The <strong>Nuremberg framing</strong> used by FM Stenergard resonates powerfully — "Russia must be held accountable, otherwise aggressive wars will pay off" translates directly to a public that experienced Cold War existential threat and values the post-WWII order.</p>
 <p><strong>Differential exposure</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-1-swedish-citizens--public">🏛️ 1. Swedish Citizens &#x26; Pu
 <p><strong>Electoral implications</strong>: HD03231 is not a polarising issue like KU33 (press freedom). It is a <strong>unifying issue</strong> that serves government narrative of responsible international leadership. Risk: disinformation-driven fatigue could make it mildly polarising by election day (Sep 2026).</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH for support; MEDIUM for durability under sustained Russian disinformation campaign.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition (M / KD / L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Strongly supportive and politically invested — founding-member status is a major foreign-policy achievement PM Kristersson and FM Stenergard will campaign on.</p>
 <p><strong>Key individuals</strong>:</p>
 
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-2-government-coalition-m--kd--l">🏛️ 2. Government Coalition
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: "Sweden is a founding member of the first tribunal to hold aggressors accountable since Nuremberg. This is Sweden at its best — leading on international law and standing up for a rules-based world order."</p>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: <strong>Zero significant domestic risk</strong> on HD03231 itself. Primary vulnerability is if disinformation campaigns successfully reframe the tribunal as "provocative toward Russia" in ways that create valrörelse dialogue costs.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position on Ukraine/Tribunal</strong>: Strongly supportive. S led Sweden's 2022 response; Magdalena Andersson visited Kyiv. HD03231 represents a continuation of a foreign-policy trajectory that S helped build.</li>
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp">🏛️ 3. Opposition Bloc (S / V / M
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Enthusiastically supportive. International law, human rights, and accountability are core MP values. Daniel Helldén will likely frame HD03231 as a model for future conflict accountability.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten">🏛️ 4. Security Apparatus (SÄPO / NCSC / MSB / Försvarsmakten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten">🏛️ 4. Security Apparatus (SÄPO / NCSC / MSB / Försvarsmakten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SÄPO (Security Police)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mission-level impact</strong>: HD03231 ratification is a primary driver of elevated threat posture for SÄPO's FCI (Foreign Counter-Intelligence) and VKT (Violent Extremism) departments. Founding-member status for a tribunal targeting living Russian state leaders creates a <strong>persistent, long-duration threat scenario</strong>.</li>
@@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-4-security-apparatus-säpo--ncsc--msb--försvarsmakten">🏛️ 4
 <li><strong>NATO integration</strong>: SACEUR planning integrates Swedish tribunal co-founding as a factor in Russian motivation analysis for below-threshold operations.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--5-business--industry">🏢 5. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--5-business--industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-business--industry">🏢 5. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-business--industry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Saab AB</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Net positive. Sweden's sustained Ukraine engagement (confirmed by founding-member tribunal status) creates sustained demand for Saab's Ukraine-relevant systems: AT4 (anti-tank), Carl-Gustaf, RBS-70, Gripen E cooperation. The tribunal signals Sweden will not exit Ukraine engagement — the opposite of Ukraine fatigue.</li>
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--5-business--industry">🏢 5. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" ar
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: Russian court-ordered asset seizures on remaining Volvo legal entities in Russia.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--6-international-community">🌐 6. International Community<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--6-international-community"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-community">🌐 6. International Community<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-community"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Council of Europe (CoE)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Institutional champion; EPA framework architect. Sweden's founding-member commitment is a critical success metric for the CoE post-ECHR reform era.</li>
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--6-international-community">🌐 6. International Community<a class="
 <li><strong>Actively hostile</strong>. Russia will pursue every available pathway to undermine the tribunal: diplomatic isolation of supporters, legal challenges, economic coercion, and — at elevated probability — hybrid operations against founding-member states.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Review of HD03231 legal text expected before committee consideration.</li>
@@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-7-judiciary--constitutional">⚖️ 7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitut
 <li>Key issue: What safeguards does UU recommend for tribunal communications security?</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-media--public-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Mainstream Swedish media</strong> (SVT, Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet, TT):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Will cover HD03231 through two frames: (1) legal-historical Nuremberg frame (positive, ceremonial); (2) geopolitical-security frame (analytical). The security dimension is significantly <strong>underreported</strong> relative to its significance.</li>
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--8-media--public-opinion">📰 8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Counter-narrative priority</strong>: The most effective counter-narrative is the Nuremberg frame itself — "holding aggressors accountable is what civilised countries do; Sweden did the right thing." This is also the most politically durable framing across the full Swedish political spectrum.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative (Russian cyber retaliation over 24 months), surface wildcards (US non-cooperation, dual-track sabotage), and assign priors that analysts can update as Lagrådet yttrande, SÄPO bulletin, and first-vote outcomes arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--master-scenario-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-scenario-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-19&#x3C;br/>HD03231 tabled"]
     L["⚖️ Lagrådet yttrande&#x3C;br/>Q2 2026"]
@@ -1666,8 +1666,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--master-scenario-tree">🧭 Master Scenario Tree<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p>Probabilities are zero-sum within each branch, cumulative across the full tree. Bayesian update rules are defined per scenario below.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Ratified + Sustained Below-Threshold Hybrid Pressure" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">📖 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042">🟢 BASE — "Ratified + Sustained Below-Threshold Hybrid Pressure" (P = 0.42)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on security operational gaps (procedural review); Utrikesutskottet betänkande reports broad cross-party support; first Riksdag vote in H2 2026 passes with ≈ 340+ MPs; M-KD-L+SD bloc retains post-election government (or S-led coalition that continues Ukraine line). Tribunal ratified and deposited by Q4 2026; operational commencement H1 2027.</p>
 <p><strong>Russian response — base-case profile (2026-06 → 2027-12):</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--ratified--sustained-below-threshold-hybrid-pressure-p--042">
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH — this is the central projection reflecting base rates of Russian retaliation against aggression-accountability actions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022">🔵 BULL — "Ratified + Security Remediation Package" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022">🔵 BULL — "Ratified + Security Remediation Package" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande explicitly flags the security-gap ("tribunal accession requires Commensurate operational-security posture"); Utrikesutskottet committee recommends a follow-on instruction to the government to propose SÄPO/NCSC/MSB mandate-expansion legislation in H2 2026 vårändringsbudget. Either the current coalition or an incoming S-led coalition adopts the recommendation. A dedicated <strong>Defence Commission 2026 ad-hoc report</strong> on tribunal security obligations is commissioned.</p>
 <p><strong>What's different from BASE:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--ratified--security-remediation-package-p--022">🔵 BULL — "
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — requires opposition policy entrepreneurship OR government self-correction; both are possible but not highly likely.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018">🔴 BEAR — "Operational Cyber Incident Before Tribunal Opens" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018">🔴 BEAR — "Operational Cyber Incident Before Tribunal Opens" (P = 0.18)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on security; government does not upgrade operational posture; SÄPO Hotbildsanalys 2026 flags the risk but is not politically actioned in H2 2026 budget. Between Q4 2026 (Riksdag vote) and Q2 2027 (tribunal operational), a <strong>tier-2 cyber incident</strong> occurs against UD, NCSC, Riksdag IT, or tribunal-adjacent Swedish infrastructure — or a correlated undersea cable sabotage event that is plausibly (but not conclusively) attributed to GRU Sandworm / APT28.</p>
 <p><strong>Impact profile:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1749,7 +1749,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear--operational-cyber-incident-before-tribunal-opens-p--018">🔴
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — consistent with Russian pattern; specific targeting vector and timing are uncertain.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Dual-Track Sabotage in Valrörelse Window" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010">⚡ WILDCARD 1 — "Dual-Track Sabotage in Valrörelse Window" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: A single adversarial campaign combines (1) a Baltic undersea-cable or critical-pipeline incident in the August–September 2026 valrörelse window with (2) a coordinated Swedish-language disinformation surge framing Sweden as an "aggressive US-aligned belligerent". Attribution to Russia is plausible but below formal threshold; amplified by domestic Russia-sympathetic influence networks (legacy Alternative for Sverige / Sverigedemokraterna-adjacent online networks that have since repositioned but whose audiences remain).</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-1--dual-track-sabotage-in-valrörelse-window-p--010">⚡ WI
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Analyst confidence</strong>: MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "US Non-Cooperation Blocks Tribunal" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD 2 — "US Non-Cooperation Blocks Tribunal" (P = 0.08)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: The Trump administration (47th US presidency) formally refuses to cooperate with the tribunal on intelligence-sharing, witness deposition, or extradition grounds — framing cooperation as "interference with potential US-Russia negotiation". The refusal undermines the tribunal's evidence-gathering capacity; the first indictments are delayed into 2028 or constrained to evidence available from European intelligence services alone.</p>
 <p><strong>Swedish implications:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-2--us-non-cooperation-blocks-tribunal-p--008">⚡ WILDCARD
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Analyst confidence</strong>: LOW-MEDIUM — US posture is the single largest uncertainty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid">📐 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid">📐 Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid"></a></h3>
 <p>Heuer's ACH is used here to test the <strong>dominant narrative</strong> ("HD03231 triggers elevated Russian cyber threat against Sweden") against competing hypotheses. Consistent = ✅, inconsistent = ❌, ambiguous = ?</p>
 
 
@@ -1882,7 +1882,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach-grid">📐 Analysis of Competin
 <p><strong>ACH result</strong>: H1 (elevated cyber retaliation) is the strongest-supported hypothesis. H3 (dual-track sabotage including physical) is a secondary credible hypothesis. H2, H4, H5 are weakly supported individually.</p>
 <p><strong>Prior weighted by ACH</strong>: <code>P(cyber) = 0.60–0.70</code> over 24 months from HD03231 tabling; <code>P(dual-track) = 0.18–0.22</code>; <code>P(status-quo) = 0.10–0.15</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">🗓️ Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">🗓️ Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">🗓️ Mo
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Scenario update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande explicit security language</td><td>If YES → BULL probability +0.10; BEAR −0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Jun 2026</td><td>SÄPO Hotbildsanalys 2026</td><td>If flags HD03231 as new factor → BEAR +0.05; BULL +0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Jul 2026</td><td>Utrikesutskottet betänkande tone</td><td>Silent on security → BEAR baseline; flags gap → BULL</td></tr><tr><td>Aug–Sep 2026</td><td>Valrörelse disinformation volume</td><td>High volume → WILDCARD 1 probability +0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Aug–Sep 2026</td><td>Baltic cable incident (SE-FI/SE-DE)</td><td>Incident → WILDCARD 1 +0.10; BEAR +0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td>Election result</td><td>E1 retained → BASE; E2/E3 → BULL viability +0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Oct–Nov 2026</td><td>Government-formation period</td><td>Extended (>30 days) → WILDCARD 1 vote-swing confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td>First Riksdag kammarvote</td><td>Unanimous → stability signal → BASE holds</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2027</td><td>US DoJ/State tribunal-cooperation posture</td><td>Non-cooperation → WILDCARD 2 +0.15</td></tr><tr><td>H1 2027</td><td>Tribunal operational</td><td>If smooth + no incident → R1 drifts to 12/25</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2027</td><td>First indictment (Putin / Gerasimov / Shoigu)</td><td>Operational-tier Russian response window opens</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">🧩 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">🧩 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1979,7 +1979,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">🧩 Cross-Reference to U
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Upstream run</th><th>Scenario file</th><th>Alignment to this dossier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>realtime-1434</code> (2026-04-17)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>BASE aligned with realtime-1434 BASE on HD03231 (ratification prob 0.50 vs this dossier's ratification-across-all-branches = 0.89 — <strong>this dossier raises ratification prob because 3 days of additional signal intake confirms cross-party consensus</strong>)</td></tr><tr><td><code>month-ahead</code> (2026-04-19)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Forward-vote calendar aligned; month-ahead tracks HD03231 as "H2 2026 vote, high confidence" — this dossier refines the post-vote Russian-response scenario tree</td></tr><tr><td><code>monthly-review</code> (2026-04-19)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>30-day retrospective supports the "elevated threat baseline" — this dossier provides the operational scenario branches for the next 24 months</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Probability alignment check</strong>: this dossier's BASE (0.42) is consistent with realtime-1434 KU33 BASE (0.42). The ratification probability across BASE+BULL = 0.64 is broadly aligned with weekly-review's "high cross-party consensus on Ukraine" qualitative assessment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts">🔁 Bayesian Update Rules (Quick Reference for Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts">🔁 Bayesian Update Rules (Quick Reference for Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts"></a></h3>
 <p>If the following signals fire, update priors as shown:</p>
 
 
@@ -2063,12 +2063,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-rules-quick-reference-for-analysts">🔁 Bayesian Up
 <p>These updates should be applied in the <strong>next</strong> realtime-monitor or weekly-review dossier after any signal fires — not in this one. This is a monitoring instrument, not a current state.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-1">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-1"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 or event-driven (first Lagrådet yttrande or SÄPO bulletin)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2104,7 +2104,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>RSK-ID</strong></td><td>RSK-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:30 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>ISO 27005 + political risk methodology; probability × impact (1–5 scale)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber, defence, Ukraine security dimensions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-register--priority-matrix">🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-register--priority-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register--priority-matrix">🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register--priority-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-register--priority-matrix">🎯 Risk Register — Priority Matr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Risk ID</th><th>Risk Description</th><th align="center">Domain</th><th align="center">Probability (1-5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1-5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Risk Level</th><th align="center">Action</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R1</strong></td><td>Russian hybrid warfare (cyber + disinfo + sabotage) targeting Sweden as tribunal founding member</td><td align="center">Russia/Security</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>20</strong></td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R2</strong></td><td>US non-cooperation with tribunal — evidentiary and enforcement gap</td><td align="center">Institutional</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R3</strong></td><td>Spear-phishing / APT compromise of UD tribunal planning communications</td><td align="center">Cyber</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R4</strong></td><td>Baltic Sea infrastructure sabotage correlated with tribunal milestones</td><td align="center">Physical/Russia</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R5</strong></td><td>Tribunal second-reading vote failure (2027) if post-election Riksdag composition shifts</td><td align="center">Domestic/Political</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R6</strong></td><td>Russian asset seizure targeting Swedish firms</td><td align="center">Economic</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R7</strong></td><td>ICJ jurisdictional challenge filed by Russia</td><td align="center">Legal</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R8</strong></td><td>Disinformation-driven Ukraine fatigue affecting second-reading consensus</td><td align="center">Political</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R9</strong></td><td>SD reversal on Ukraine support — Nuremberg framing fails</td><td align="center">Domestic</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MONITOR</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>US-brokered ceasefire shields Russian leadership; tribunal effectiveness collapses</td><td align="center">Geopolitical</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-heat-map">📊 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">📊 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title HD03231 Risk Heat Map
     x-axis Low Impact --> Critical Impact
@@ -2253,8 +2253,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-heat-map">📊 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
     R9-SD-Reversal: [0.75, 0.35]
     R10-Ceasefire: [0.90, 0.55]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deep-risk-profiles">🔍 Deep Risk Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deep-risk-profiles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score: 20/25 — CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-deep-risk-profiles">🔍 Deep Risk Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deep-risk-profiles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical">R1 — Russian Hybrid Warfare (Score: 20/25 — CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Sweden's transition from Ukraine-supporter to co-founding-member of a tribunal targeting Putin/Gerasimov/Shoigu is the most significant qualitative shift in Sweden's threat posture since NATO accession (March 2024). Russia classifies tribunal-supporting states through a threat-actor matrix where "founding member with institutional durability" ranks higher than "arms supplier" (arms can be cut; institutional membership cannot be easily reversed).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2282,7 +2282,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r1--russian-hybrid-warfare-score-2025--critical">R1 — Russian Hybri
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Residual risk after mitigation</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (4/25 → 12/25 with mitigations; below-threshold operations persist)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high">R2 — US Non-Cooperation (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high">R2 — US Non-Cooperation (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: The current US administration's posture toward international criminal accountability mechanisms (ICC, ICJ, multilateral tribunals) is historically reluctant. A second Trump term (2025–2029) creates systematic risk of non-cooperation — or active obstruction — at the tribunal's critical evidence-building phase.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r2--us-non-cooperation-score-1625--high">R2 — US Non-Cooperation (S
 <p><strong>Trajectory</strong>: The risk increases rather than decreases as tribunal operations commence. The US cooperation question will become acute at the prosecutorial evidence-gathering phase (2027+).</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: EU intelligence pooling (INTCEN); UK/Australia Five Eyes sharing; national intelligence from Nordic/Baltic coalition; OSINT (open-source intelligence) is legally admissible for elements of aggression crime prosecution.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high">R3 — APT Compromise of UD Communications (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high">R3 — APT Compromise of UD Communications (Score: 16/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: UD (Utrikesdepartementet) officials are conducting sensitive tribunal planning discussions through government IT systems that are not uniformly classified or isolated. APT29 (SVR Cozy Bear) has a documented pattern of targeting foreign ministry communications in NATO/CoE member states.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r3--apt-compromise-of-ud-communications-score-1625--high">R3 — APT
 <p><strong>Trajectory</strong>: Active risk from the moment HD03231 was tabled (April 16, 2026). Tribunal planning correspondence is now a priority intelligence target.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: GovCERT monitoring; NCSC hardening requirements; FIDO2 deployment (in progress per MSB cybersecurity programme). <strong>Critical gap</strong>: Tribunal planning communications should move to air-gapped classified systems immediately.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high">R8 — Disinformation and Ukraine Fatigue (Score: 12/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high">R8 — Disinformation and Ukraine Fatigue (Score: 12/25 — HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Russia's active measures infrastructure (IRA, GRU, foreign influence coordination) has demonstrated capability to shift public opinion in Nordic democracies. The 2026 Swedish election provides a uniquely exploitable opportunity: the second reading of HD03231 (ratifying tribunal founding membership) occurs after the election, meaning the newly elected Riksdag decides. If Russian disinformation can shift the election by even 2-3 percentage points toward parties more amenable to Ukraine fatigue narratives, the second reading becomes uncertain.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r8--disinformation-and-ukraine-fatigue-score-1225--high">R8 — Disin
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Trajectory</strong>: ESCALATING into valrörelse 2026. MSB prebunking capacity needs significant scale-up before September 2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-sensitivity-analysis">📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-sensitivity-analysis">📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2367,7 +2367,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-sensitivity-analysis">📈 Risk Sensitivity Analysis<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Affected Risks</th><th>Change</th><th>Overall Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>US rejoins international institutions</strong></td><td>R2</td><td>−3 points</td><td>Score 16→13 (HIGH→MEDIUM-HIGH)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Baltic cable incident pre-election</strong></td><td>R1, R8</td><td>+2 each</td><td>Galvanising effect — actually strengthens pro-tribunal consensus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden election: left majority</strong></td><td>R5, R9</td><td>R5 score +3</td><td>KD/L/M lose — second reading risk increases</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tribunal first indictment of Putin</strong></td><td>R1, R4, R6</td><td>+2 each</td><td>Peak hybrid-response phase</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-Ukraine ceasefire (Dec 2026)</strong></td><td>R10</td><td>+2</td><td>Political will may erode for second reading</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NCSC cybersecurity uplift for UD</strong></td><td>R3</td><td>−4 points</td><td>Score 16→12 (HIGH→MEDIUM)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2407,8 +2407,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SWOT-ID</strong></td><td>SWT-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:25 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>political-swot-framework v3.0 (TOWS interference applied) · Security-enhanced for Russia/cyber/defence lens</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraine — security dimensions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-article-generator (deep-inspection)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis">🏛️ Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-framework-note">Framework Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-note"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis">🏛️ Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-framework-note">Framework Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-note"></a></h4>
 <p>The deep-inspection SWOT applies three stakeholder lenses simultaneously:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Swedish Government</strong> (policy owner, HD03231 promoter)</li>
@@ -2416,8 +2416,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-framework-note">Framework Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li><strong>Civil Society/Security Apparatus</strong> (implementation and defence actors)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective">Strengths — Swedish Government Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective">Strengths — Swedish Government Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths--swedish-government-perspective">Strengths — Swedish Gove
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1</strong></td><td>Sweden is a <strong>founding member</strong> — not merely a participant — meaning Sweden shapes institutional design, rules of procedure, and prosecutorial priorities from day one</td><td>HD03231 text; FM Stenergard press release; "core group" participation since Feb 2022</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S2</strong></td><td><strong>Cross-party political unanimity</strong> (≈349/349 MPs projected) — KU33 shows splits, but Ukraine accountability commands near-consensus; this insulates the proposition from populist reversal</td><td>Stakeholder position matrix; SD Nuremberg-framing compatibility</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3</strong></td><td><strong>NATO Article 5 anchor</strong> (since Mar 2024) means Sweden's tribunal co-founding occurs within a collective-defence framework — hybrid attacks below armed-attack threshold are partially deterred</td><td>RF 10 kap.; NATO Charter Art. 5; SACEUR guidelines</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4</strong></td><td><strong>Council of Europe EPA structure</strong> avoids need for UNSC approval — the single most important legal innovation; circumvents Russian veto</td><td>HD03231 legal analysis; CoE EPA statute</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S5</strong></td><td>FM Stenergard's <strong>Nuremberg framing</strong> is rhetorically cross-partisan — unifies conservative law-and-order base with liberal internationalist base; SD cannot oppose without opposing Nuremberg legacy</td><td>Stenergard verbatim; historical analysis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S6</strong></td><td><strong>Low direct fiscal cost</strong> — EPA assessed dues estimated SEK 30–80M annually; reparations architecture (HD03232) funded from Russian immobilised assets (EUR 260B), not Swedish treasury</td><td>HD03231 financial annex; HD03232 text</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S7</strong></td><td><strong>Signalling credibility</strong>: Sweden was part of the core working group since February 2022, signed letter of intent March 2026, and now tables founding-member legislation — the commitment trajectory is consistent and verifiable</td><td>FM press release timeline</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective">Strengths — Parliamentary/Democratic Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective">Strengths — Parliamentary/Democratic Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths--parliamentarydemocratic-perspective">Strengths — Parliam
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S8</strong></td><td><strong>Two-chamber democratic legitimacy</strong> — unlike executive orders, Riksdag ratification gives the tribunal commitment constitutional durability</td><td>RF 10 kap. treaty approval</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S9</strong></td><td><strong>Bipartisan geopolitical consensus</strong> cuts across normal coalition/opposition dynamics — the vote on HD03231 will not cleave M vs S but will demonstrate Swedish democratic coherence to international partners</td><td>Stakeholder analysis; Swedish foreign-policy tradition</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective">Strengths — Security Apparatus Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective">Strengths — Security Apparatus Perspective<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths--security-apparatus-perspective">Strengths — Security App
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S10</strong></td><td><strong>SÄPO and MSB already operate at elevated posture</strong> post-NATO accession; tribunal co-founding is an incremental rather than step-change addition to threat exposure</td><td>MSB Hotbildsanalys 2025; SÄPO annual report 2025</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S11</strong></td><td>NATO CCDCOE (Tallinn), StratCom COE (Riga), and JFC Norfolk provide allied intelligence-sharing that partially compensates for Sweden's bilateral operational gap vs Russia</td><td>NATO framework; bilateral intelligence relationships</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2594,7 +2594,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>W1</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal effectiveness fundamentally depends on non-member cooperation</strong> — Russia, US (currently), China, and India are not members. Without US cooperation, evidence access, enforcement mechanisms, and asset-seizure coordination are severely constrained</td><td>ICC effectiveness literature; tribunal statute; US historical position on ICL</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W2</strong></td><td><strong>In absentia proceedings</strong> — the tribunal will function without the accused present. Historical precedent (SCSL) shows this is legally viable but limits political impact; Putin/Gerasimov will not appear, making the tribunal partly symbolic</td><td>SCSL comparative analysis; tribunal statute</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W3</strong></td><td><strong>Sitting head-of-state immunity</strong> under customary international law (ICJ <em>Arrest Warrant</em> 2002) may protect current Russian leadership — the tribunal's design partially addresses this, but legal uncertainty remains</td><td>ICJ 2002 DRC v Belgium; Rome Statute Art. 27; Art. 98</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4</strong></td><td><strong>Russia-facing hybrid threat increased without commensurate counter-capability uplift</strong> — HD03231 elevates Sweden's targeting priority in Russian threat-actor classification, but the Riksdag vote and public debate do not include a compensating security-investment announcement</td><td>SÄPO threat assessment; MSB capacity analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>UD communications security</strong> is not systematically hardened against state-sponsored spear-phishing at the level required by the tribunal's operational sensitivity — tribunal-planning communications (witness lists, evidence handling, prosecutorial strategy) may be vulnerable</td><td>GovCERT assessment pattern; comparative APT analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W6</strong></td><td><strong>Global South buy-in is limited</strong> — the tribunal's legitimacy (and thus deterrent value) depends on broad adherence; many African, Asian, and Latin American states see the ICC and associated mechanisms as Western instruments</td><td>UNGA vote analysis on Ukraine accountability; African Union position</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2658,8 +2658,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>O1</strong></td><td><strong>Closes the Nuremberg Gap</strong> — establishes that aggression by a UNSC P5 member can be prosecuted; durable precedent for 21st-century ICL</td><td>Legal analysis; tribunal statute comparison</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O2</strong></td><td><strong>Sweden as ICL norm-entrepreneur</strong> — tribunal co-founding enhances Sweden's international standing in areas (UN Human Rights Council, international arbitration, ICC Assembly of States) where credibility requires demonstrated commitment</td><td>Comparative norm-entrepreneurship analysis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O3</strong></td><td><strong>Reconstruction positioning</strong> — founding membership in tribunal signals sustained political commitment to Ukraine that enhances Saab, Ericsson, Volvo, and other Swedish firms' competitive positioning for Ukraine reconstruction contracts (estimated EUR 500B+ over 10 years)</td><td>WB/EBRD reconstruction estimates; procurement patterns</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O4</strong></td><td><strong>Strengthens Ukrainian leverage</strong> — operational tribunal is a deterrent against ceasefire terms that shield Russian leadership from accountability; Sweden's founding role supports Ukraine's negotiating position</td><td>Ceasefire scenario analysis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O5</strong></td><td><strong>Baltic Sea security benefit</strong> — tribunal signals to Russia that NATO eastern flank states coordinate not just militarily but through international law; reduces ambiguity about Western resolve</td><td>NATO cohesion analysis</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O6</strong></td><td><strong>Defence industry catalyst</strong> — the tribunal's visibility creates political space for further Saab Gripen E sales to Ukraine, Carl-Gustaf deliveries, AT4 anti-tank system transfers; the legal-moral framing reduces domestic political friction for weapon transfers</td><td>Swedish defence export policy</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O7</strong></td><td><strong>Hybrid threat intelligence sharing opportunity</strong> — Sweden can leverage tribunal-membership relationships with ~40 CoE EPA member states for structured intelligence sharing on Russian hybrid operations targeting tribunal-supporting states</td><td>CoE framework; Five Eyes / EU intelligence corridors</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens">Threats — Russia/Hybrid Dimension (Focus Lens)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">🔴 Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens">Threats — Russia/Hybrid Dimension (Focus Lens)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats--russiahybrid-dimension-focus-lens">Threats — Russia/Hybrid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Cyber operations against Swedish government infrastructure</strong> — GRU/SVR APTs (Sandworm, APT29, Gamaredon) will escalate targeting of UD, Riksdag IT, NCSC, and Försvarsmakten following HD03231 ratification</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Disinformation campaign targeting valrörelse-2026</strong> — Russia's IRA/GRU active measures will embed anti-tribunal, anti-Ukraine-aid narratives in Swedish social media; SD voter base is primary target for narrative seeding</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Baltic Sea infrastructure sabotage</strong> — undersea cables (SE-FI Estlink, SE-DE Balticconnector-analogue), rail infrastructure, and logistics nodes are potential targets for "plausibly deniable" sabotage operations correlated with tribunal milestones</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Diplomatic isolation pressure</strong> — Russia will leverage relationships with non-Western partners to build a coalition opposing the tribunal's legitimacy; each state defection from tribunal support reduces effectiveness</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>Economic retaliation against Swedish firms</strong> — Russian government can seize/restrict assets of Swedish companies with remaining Russia exposure (post-2022 exits were not complete; legacy contracts remain)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Assassination/targeted harassment of Swedish tribunal officials</strong> — historical Russian pattern (Salisbury 2018, Navalny 2020/2024, multiple Baltic/Nordic incidents) elevates personal security risk for tribunal architects</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension">Threats — Legal/Institutional Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension">Threats — Legal/Institutional Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2770,7 +2770,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats--legalinstitutional-dimension">Threats — Legal/Institutiona
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>US refusal to cooperate</strong> — a second Trump term (2025-2029) creates systematic US non-cooperation with international criminal accountability mechanisms; without US intelligence, evidence base is severely weakened</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Jurisdictional challenge at ICJ</strong> — Russia could seek an ICJ advisory opinion or contentious case arguing the tribunal lacks jurisdiction; even a partial ICJ ruling against the tribunal would be a significant setback</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T9</strong></td><td><strong>Tribunal funding shortfall</strong> — if major contributors withdraw or reduce assessed dues, tribunal operations could be curtailed before indictments are issued</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T10</strong></td><td><strong>Trump administration recognition of Russian territorial gains</strong> — a US-brokered ceasefire that "freezes" Russian occupation could fatally undermine the political will to prosecute aggression that ended with a US-negotiated settlement</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-analysis">🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-analysis">🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2820,7 +2820,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tows-interference-analysis">🔄 TOWS Interference Analysis<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interaction</th><th align="center">Type</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Strategic Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S1 × T1</strong>: Founding-member status elevates cyber-targeting priority</td><td align="center">S–T</td><td>GRU/SVR classify Sweden as Tier-1 tribunal target; UD and NCSC now face enhanced APT operations</td><td>SÄPO/NCSC immediate posture review; NATO CCDCOE bilateral engagement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S4 × W1</strong>: EPA design circumvents UNSC but cannot enforce against non-members</td><td align="center">S–W</td><td>Structural limitation persists despite legal innovation</td><td>EU leverage via SWIFT/sanctions to incentivise cooperation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S3 × T7</strong>: NATO Art. 5 partially compensates for US non-cooperation on ICL</td><td align="center">S–T</td><td>Alliance intelligence-sharing partially fills evidentiary gap</td><td>Five Eyes bilateral intelligence-sharing arrangement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O7 × T1</strong>: Tribunal intelligence-sharing network enables faster APT attribution</td><td align="center">O–T</td><td>CoE EPA member-state network creates structured threat-intel sharing channel</td><td>Formalise cyber-threat intel sharing among EPA members</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W4 × T1+T3</strong>: Elevated threat without compensating security uplift creates window of vulnerability</td><td align="center">W–T</td><td>Sweden's threat posture increases before defensive measures are fully scaled</td><td>Emergency NCSC/MSB funding allocation; NATO force posture review</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S7 × T4</strong>: Commitment credibility reduces Russia's ability to deter through pre-ratification coercion</td><td align="center">S–T</td><td>Russia cannot credibly threaten to reverse HD03231 before vote; coercion window is short</td><td>Accelerate parliamentary vote timeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid">📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid">📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color-Coded Mermaid)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph SWOT["Multi-Stakeholder SWOT — HD03231 Ukraine Aggression Tribunal"]
         direction TB
@@ -2881,7 +2881,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--swot-quadrant-map-color-coded-mermaid">📊 SWOT Quadrant Map (Color
     style T7N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style T10N fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2917,7 +2917,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>THR-ID</strong></td><td>THR-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:28 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>STRIDE (political-adapted) · Cyber Kill Chain · Diamond Model · MITRE ATT&#x26;CK Framework</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231 (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraine hybrid warfare</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-register-priority-ordered">🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ordered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-register-priority-ordered"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-register-priority-ordered">🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ordered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register-priority-ordered"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-register-priority-ordered">🎭 Threat Register (Priority-Ord
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Actor</th><th>Method</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian cyber operations</strong> against Swedish government infrastructure (UD, Riksdag IT, NCSC) post-HD03231 ratification</td><td align="center">GRU Sandworm, SVR APT29, FSB Turla</td><td>Spear-phishing, supply-chain compromise, zero-day exploitation</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td><strong>Disinformation campaign</strong> targeting Sweden's 2026 valrörelse — embedding anti-tribunal narratives, Ukraine-aid fatigue messaging, SD voter manipulation</td><td align="center">IRA, GRU Unit 26165</td><td>Fake social media accounts, Swedish-language troll farms, deepfake video</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td><strong>Baltic Sea undersea cable sabotage</strong> — correlation with tribunal-milestone events provides deniable timing signal</td><td align="center">GRU/military intelligence naval units</td><td>Vessel-based cutting/tampering; AIS spoofing</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td><strong>Spear-phishing against tribunal-planning personnel</strong> — UD diplomats, tribunal preparatory committee staff, Swedish delegation</td><td align="center">SVR APT29 (Cozy Bear)</td><td>Credential harvesting; Microsoft 365 exploitation; OAuth token theft</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td><strong>Physical targeting of Swedish tribunal officials</strong> — low probability but asymmetric impact; pattern from Salisbury (2018), Vilnius poisoning attempts</td><td align="center">SVR / GRU special operations</td><td>Polonium/Novichok poisoning, staged accidents, intimidation</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td><strong>Energy grid disruption</strong> — targeting Swedish power infrastructure in coordination with tribunal vote timeline</td><td align="center">GRU Sandworm (precedent: Ukraine 2015–16)</td><td>SCADA/ICS exploitation; pre-positioned malware</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td><strong>Supply-chain attack on Swedish defence industry</strong> — Saab, BAE Systems Bofors, Nammo supply chains contain Russia-adjacent contractors</td><td align="center">GRU, state-sponsored criminal groups</td><td>Third-party software injection; hardware tampering</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 ACTIVE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T8</strong></td><td><strong>Legal counter-challenges</strong> — Russia seeks ICJ advisory opinion against tribunal jurisdiction</td><td align="center">Russia (legal &#x26; diplomatic)</td><td>ICJ contentious case, UN General Assembly lobbying, bilateral pressure</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T9</strong></td><td><strong>Ukraine fatigue narrative acceleration</strong> — domestic political exploitation by populist actors to undermine second-reading consensus in 2027</td><td align="center">Domestic actors (proxies possible)</td><td>Parliamentary questioning, media campaigns, economic-cost framing</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MONITOR</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T10</strong></td><td><strong>Russian asset seizure</strong> targeting Swedish companies with Russia exposure (Saab civil, Volvo legacy, Ericsson network equipment)</td><td align="center">Russian government</td><td>Administrative decree; court orders; regulatory pressure</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MANAGE</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231">🎯 Cyber Kill Chain Adaptation — Russian Hybrid Campaign Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231">🎯 Cyber Kill Chain Adaptation — Russian Hybrid Campaign Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Adapting Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain (Hutchins et al. 2011) to Russian hybrid-warfare targeting of Sweden after HD03231 founding-member status. This is the <strong>most probable</strong> threat vector given documented Russian APT patterns.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3062,7 +3062,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cyber-kill-chain-adaptation--russian-hybrid-campaign-against-hd03231
     style IN fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style CC fill:#B71C1C,color:#FFFFFF
     style AC fill:#880E4F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context">Kill Chain Stage Analysis — HD03231 Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context">Kill Chain Stage Analysis — HD03231 Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3126,7 +3126,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-kill-chain-stage-analysis--hd03231-context">Kill Chain Stage Analysis
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Specific Swedish Target</th><th>Russian APT Method</th><th>Detection Opportunity</th><th>Swedish Countermeasure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></td><td>UD official LinkedIn profiles; tribunal preparatory committee membership (public); MSB org chart</td><td>OSINT automation; targeted social media profiling</td><td>Threat-intel monitoring of suspicious LinkedIn activity</td><td>SÄPO/UD awareness training; profile minimisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaponisation</strong></td><td>MS Office macro exploits; PDF zero-days; LNK files; stolen credentials from dark web</td><td>CVE stockpiling; 0-day market purchases</td><td>Threat-intel feeds (NCSC)</td><td>Patch management; GovCERT bulletin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Delivery</strong></td><td>Email to UD officials with tribunal-related lures ("Draft tribunal statute", "Meeting agenda CoE")</td><td>Spear-phishing; watering hole attacks on CoE websites</td><td>Email gateway scanning; anomalous attachment analysis</td><td>NCSC email security; GovCERT filtering</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Exploitation</strong></td><td>Microsoft 365 tenant; VPN authentication; Citrix gateway</td><td>OAuth token theft; MFA bypass; password spraying</td><td>SIEM anomaly detection; failed-auth monitoring</td><td>Phishing-resistant MFA (FIDO2); Privileged Identity Management</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Installation</strong></td><td>UD network; Riksdag IT; MSB crisis management systems</td><td>Custom implants (SUNBURST-family); scheduled tasks</td><td>EDR telemetry; process creation monitoring</td><td>NCSC-certified EDR deployment; threat hunting</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C&#x26;C</strong></td><td>Beaconing through Azure/Office365 channels; Cloudflare Workers</td><td>HTTPS/443 exfil; DNS tunnelling; cloud-service abuse</td><td>Network traffic analysis; DNS monitoring; cloud-app access logs</td><td>NCSC SOC; DNS RPZ; CASB deployment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Actions</strong></td><td>Tribunal evidence exfiltration; witness list compromise; coalition disruption data</td><td>Archive collection; data staging; destructive payload pre-positioning</td><td>DLP alerts; data-transfer monitoring</td><td>Data classification; access controls; DLP</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Operation Against Sweden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Operation Against Sweden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ADV["⚔️ Adversary&#x3C;br/>GRU Unit 26165&#x3C;br/>SVR APT29&#x3C;br/>FSB Centre 18&#x3C;br/>+ IRA information ops"]
     CAP["🔧 Capability&#x3C;br/>SUNBURST/GOLDMAX malware&#x3C;br/>Sandworm ICS toolkit&#x3C;br/>Active measures (disinformation)&#x3C;br/>Physical sabotage (naval units)"]
@@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-operation-against-sweden">💎 Diamond
     style INF fill:#FF9800,color:#FFFFFF
     style VIC fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign">🏗️ Attack Tree — Russian Counter-Tribunal Campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign">🏗️ Attack Tree — Russian Counter-Tribunal Campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Prevent tribunal&#x3C;br/>from becoming operationally&#x3C;br/>effective against Russian leadership"]
     
@@ -3196,7 +3196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--russian-counter-tribunal-campaign">🏗️ Attack Tr
     style A2b fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF
     style A2c fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political-Security Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (Political-Security Adaptation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3246,7 +3246,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-mapping-political-security-adaptation">🧭 STRIDE Mapping (P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th>HD03231 Context</th><th>Specific Attack Vector</th><th>Countermeasure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Russian disinformation actors impersonate Swedish officials announcing "tribunal position reversal"; deepfake video of FM Stenergard</td><td>AI-generated video of FM retracting HD03231 support</td><td>UD official channel verification; rapid-response comms</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Digital evidence chain-of-custody tampering before tribunal proceedings; altering intercepted communications metadata</td><td>Man-in-the-middle attacks on UD secure communications; evidence-database injection</td><td>End-to-end encryption; air-gapped evidence systems; blockchain evidence chains</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Russia repudiates tribunal jurisdiction; pro-Russia states issue counter-declarations; "tribunal legitimacy" narrative campaign</td><td>Global South diplomatic lobbying; ICJ advisory opinion request</td><td>Pre-emptive diplomatic outreach; UNGA coalition building</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation Disclosure</td><td>UD tribunal planning documents leaked; witness/evidence list exfiltration enabling witness intimidation</td><td>APT29-style spear-phishing; insider threat; stolen laptop</td><td>Classified handling; secure comms; FIDO2 MFA; DLP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td>Swedish government crisis management capability degraded during Baltic crisis (tribunal-correlated timing)</td><td>DDoS on Riksdag.se + MSB.se during key vote; Baltic cable cut</td><td>Redundant connectivity; DDoS protection; NATO CCDCOE support</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of Privilege</td><td>Russian intelligence personnel infiltrate CoE EPA secretariat or Swedish delegation</td><td>Long-term insider placement; social engineering of CoE administrative staff</td><td>Background check protocols; CoE security screening; insider-threat programme</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">📊 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-severity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-severity-matrix">📊 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title HD03231 Threat Severity Matrix (Russia/Hybrid Focus)
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -3266,8 +3266,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-severity-matrix">📊 Threat Severity Matrix<a class="" aria-
     T9-Ukraine-Fatigue: [0.50, 0.35]
     T10-Asset-Seizure: [0.55, 0.45]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority">T1+T4 — Russian Cyber &#x26; Spear-Phishing (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-mitigation-actions">🔥 Priority Mitigation Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-mitigation-actions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority">T1+T4 — Russian Cyber &#x26; Spear-Phishing (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Immediate</strong>: NCSC/GovCERT advisory to all UD staff and tribunal-planning personnel</li>
 <li><strong>30 days</strong>: Deploy FIDO2-based phishing-resistant MFA across UD Microsoft 365 tenant</li>
@@ -3275,27 +3275,27 @@ <h3 id="rm-t1t4--russian-cyber--spear-phishing--mitigate-priority">T1+T4 — Rus
 <li><strong>90 days</strong>: Establish dedicated SOC monitoring capability for tribunal-related communications</li>
 <li><strong>Ongoing</strong>: NATO CCDCOE bilateral engagement for threat intelligence on Russian APT operations targeting tribunal-supporting states</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority">T2 — Disinformation / Valrörelse (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority">T2 — Disinformation / Valrörelse (🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--disinformation--valrörelse--mitigate-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Immediate</strong>: MSB Nationellt säkerhetsråd briefing on disinformation threat to HD03231 ratification</li>
 <li><strong>30 days</strong>: Prebunking campaign identifying specific Russian narrative templates (Ukraine fatigue, "tribunal is Western propaganda", "cost to Sweden")</li>
 <li><strong>Pre-election</strong>: StratCom COE (Riga) engagement for Swedish valrörelse specific disinformation-response support</li>
 <li><strong>Operational</strong>: All-party parliamentary group on information security should receive classified briefing on hybrid threat</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate">T3 — Baltic Sea Infrastructure (🔴 MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate">T3 — Baltic Sea Infrastructure (🔴 MITIGATE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--baltic-sea-infrastructure--mitigate"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Immediate</strong>: NATO MARCOM enhanced monitoring of Baltic Sea suspicious vessel activity</li>
 <li><strong>Protocol</strong>: Correlate any Baltic cable incident with tribunal-milestone calendar — attribution signal</li>
 <li><strong>Ongoing</strong>: Sweden-Finland-Estonia-Latvia joint patrol agreement for undersea infrastructure</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff">T4 — Spear-phishing against UD/Tribunal Staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff">T4 — Spear-phishing against UD/Tribunal Staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--spear-phishing-against-udtribunal-staff"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>GovCERT advisory (AMBER classification) to all UD personnel</li>
 <li>Tribunal preparatory committee use of classified communications systems only (no Microsoft 365 for sensitive content)</li>
 <li>Physical security review of delegation members' devices before international travel</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-timeline-correlation">🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-timeline-correlation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-timeline-correlation">🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-timeline-correlation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3340,7 +3340,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-timeline-correlation">🕐 Threat Timeline Correlation<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tribunal Milestone</th><th align="center">Approximate Date</th><th>Expected Russian Response Escalation</th><th align="center">Priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdag first reading vote</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>Disinformation surge; spear-phishing intensification</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>General election (valrörelse)</td><td align="center">Sep 2026</td><td>Peak disinformation; potential Baltic Sea incident</td><td align="center">🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag second reading</td><td align="center">Q1-Q2 2027</td><td>Cyber operations against government infrastructure</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal statute enters force</td><td align="center">H1 2027</td><td>Diplomatic isolation campaign; ICJ challenge filing</td><td align="center">🟠 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>First indictments</td><td align="center">2027–2028</td><td>Peak hybrid response; possible targeted harassment</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3388,7 +3388,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Analysis ID</strong></td><td>DOC-HD03231-DI-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dok-ID</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (Regeringens proposition)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tabled by</strong></td><td>Regeringen (UD: Maria Malmer Stenergard + PM Ulf Kristersson co-signed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Depth</strong></td><td>L3 — Intelligence Grade (Security Focus)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:37 UTC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop. 2025/26:231 proposes Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, constituted under the Council of Europe's Expanded Partial Agreement (EPA). The Tribunal — the first dedicated aggression accountability mechanism since Nuremberg — closes the structural gap in the Rome Statute where ICC jurisdiction over aggression requires UNSC approval, making P5 members effectively immune. By joining as a founding state, Sweden:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Acquires co-ownership of a historically precedent-setting international criminal institution</li>
@@ -3397,8 +3397,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 </ol>
 <p>The proposition is expected to receive broad — likely unanimous — UU committee backing (committee stage projected May–June 2026) and is projected to pass by ≈349/349 votes in first reading.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis">📊 Document Intelligence — Six-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism">Lens 1: Legal Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis">📊 Document Intelligence — Six-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-intelligence--six-lens-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism">Lens 1: Legal Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>The Aggression Gap</strong>: Under the Rome Statute (Art. 8bis, Kampala 2017), the ICC has jurisdiction over aggression — but only when the UNSC grants authorisation. Russia, as P5 member, can block any referral. The Special Tribunal bypasses this by operating under treaty law outside the Rome framework, with immunity exceptions based on individual criminal responsibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural Design</strong>: The Tribunal follows a hybrid model:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3416,7 +3416,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-legal-mechanism">Lens 1: Legal Mechanism<a class="" aria-hidde
 <li>Designate national judges for nomination (1-2 Swedish judges typical for such mechanisms)</li>
 <li>Cooperate with tribunal requests (evidence, witness protection, asset freezes)</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-political-dynamics">Lens 2: Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-political-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-political-dynamics">Lens 2: Political Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-political-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Cross-party alignment</strong> (projected):</p>
 
 
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-political-dynamics">Lens 2: Political Dynamics<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>International law champions; EU alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M (Moderaterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>PM Kristersson co-signed; NATO partnership</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Support (confirmed)</td><td>Ukraine support evolved; anti-Russia posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>EU/international law proponent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Support</td><td>Anti-imperialism; ICL advocacy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>Human rights; rule of law</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>Coalition member; values alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L (Liberalerna)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Full support</td><td>Liberal international order advocates</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Critical vulnerability</strong>: Second reading requires <em>new Riksdag</em> composition post-Sep 2026 elections. If Russian disinformation shifts SD or V, the second vote faces uncertainty. Current projection: 320–349/349.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence">Lens 3: Security Implications (PRIMARY LENS — focus_topic: russia, cyber, defence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence">Lens 3: Security Implications (PRIMARY LENS — focus_topic: russia, cyber, defence)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-defence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Threat elevation mechanics</strong>:</p>
 <p>Sweden's founding membership in a tribunal tasked with prosecuting Russian military/political leadership for the crime of aggression creates a <strong>permanent targeting incentive</strong> for Russian intelligence services (GRU, SVR, FSB). This is not speculative — historical precedent:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3485,7 +3485,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-security-implications-primary-lens--focus_topic-russia-cyber-d
 <li><strong>Legal proceedings data</strong>: Tribunal evidence chains, Swedish judicial nominations, cooperation requests</li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Gerasimov Doctrine relevance</strong>: HD03231 provides Russia with new escalation rationale under the "existential threat" framing — tribunals challenging the Russian state's legitimacy are classified as hostile acts under Russian strategic doctrine.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions">Lens 4: Economic Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions">Lens 4: Economic Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Direct costs</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>EPA assessed dues: SEK 30-80M/year (estimated from comparable mechanisms; not specified in proposition)</li>
@@ -3501,7 +3501,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-economic-dimensions">Lens 4: Economic Dimensions<a class="" ar
 <li>LKAB/Boliden: Natural resource extraction JVs in post-war Ukraine</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Cost-benefit</strong>: SEK 30-80M annual cost vs EUR 500B+ reconstruction market positioning — a clearly favourable ratio</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process">Lens 5: Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process">Lens 5: Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Procedural complexity — two-reading requirement</strong>:</p>
 <p>Under RF (Regeringsformen) 10 kap. 7 §, treaties that affect Swedish law or entail significant financial obligations require Riksdag approval. The critical constitutional question is whether <strong>two readings</strong> (requiring elections in between) are needed, which would stretch ratification to Q1-Q2 2027.</p>
 <p><strong>Timeline projection</strong>:</p>
@@ -3515,7 +3515,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-parliamentary-process">Lens 5: Parliamentary Process<a class="
 <li>Tribunal operational: 2027-2028</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political risk in election window</strong>: September-November 2026 period is the maximum vulnerability window for disinformation targeting the second vote.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-context">Lens 6: International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-international-context">Lens 6: International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-context"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Founding member status</strong> (confirmed 43 CoE members + potential non-CoE accessions):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Nordic bloc: Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Iceland — unanimously supportive</li>
@@ -3525,7 +3525,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-context">Lens 6: International Context<a class="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ICC-Tribunal relationship</strong>: The Special Tribunal operates in parallel with ICC; not substitutive. ICC's Ukraine investigation (aggression + war crimes) continues. The Tribunal is <em>aggression-only</em> — a narrower but politically stronger mandate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--evidence-table">🎯 Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-table">🎯 Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3599,7 +3599,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--evidence-table">🎯 Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence Item</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden signed Hague Convention Dec 16, 2025</td><td>HD03231 proposition text</td><td align="center">Established legal basis</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FM Stenergard + PM Kristersson co-signed</td><td>Proposition metadata</td><td align="center">Highest political commitment</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ICC Putin arrest warrant issued March 2023</td><td>ICC press office</td><td align="center">Establishes aggression accountability precedent</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Russian cyber targeting of ICC post-warrant</td><td>NCSC Netherlands advisory (public)</td><td align="center">Evidence of Russian retaliation pattern</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 companion proposition (reparations)</td><td>Riksdag dok-search</td><td align="center">Dual-track accountability + reparations</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EBRD Ukraine reconstruction estimate EUR 500B+</td><td>EBRD (2023); World Bank Joint Needs Assessment</td><td align="center">Swedish economic opportunity quantification</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Gerasimov Doctrine: tribunals as hostile acts</td><td>Russian strategic literature; IISS analysis</td><td align="center">Threat escalation rationale</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>APT29 persistent targeting of Swedish govt</td><td>NCSC Sverige; SÄPO Annual Report 2024</td><td align="center">Baseline Russian cyber threat confirmed</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>SEK 30-80M annual dues estimate</td><td>Comparable mechanisms (SCSL, ICTY cost ratios)</td><td align="center">Fiscal impact estimate</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Riksmöte 2025/26 = potentially two-reading</td><td>RF 10 kap. 7 § constitutional analysis</td><td align="center">Second-reading risk to ratification</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-analysis-for-hd03231">🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-analysis-for-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-analysis-for-hd03231">🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-analysis-for-hd03231"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3656,7 +3656,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-analysis-for-hd03231">🔒 STRIDE Analysis for HD03231<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Vector</th><th>Target</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Spoofing</strong></td><td>Fake tribunal communications; spoofed UD emails</td><td>Swedish legal team; UU members</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Certificate-based email auth (DMARC/DKIM/SPF); out-of-band verification</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tampering</strong></td><td>Evidence chain manipulation; document forgery</td><td>Tribunal evidence Sweden contributes</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td>Blockchain-based evidence integrity; HSM signing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Repudiation</strong></td><td>Russian denial of aggression (state level); disavowal of actions</td><td>Historical record; legal proceedings</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Immutable evidence archive; multiple custodians</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Information Disclosure</strong></td><td>APT exfiltration from UD of tribunal planning materials</td><td>Swedish classified coordination docs</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td>CK-based ("Cosmic Key") compartmentalization; NCSC monitoring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denial of Service</strong></td><td>DDoS on tribunal IT systems; ransomware on cooperating national systems</td><td>Swedish judicial cooperation infrastructure</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Redundant hosting; offline backup; DDoS protection</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elevation of Privilege</strong></td><td>Insider threat within UD; social engineering of tribunal staff</td><td>Tribunal leadership access; evidence custodians</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Background checks; continuous monitoring; need-to-know</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific">📊 Stakeholder Quick Reference (Document-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific">📊 Stakeholder Quick Reference (Document-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3712,7 +3712,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-quick-reference-document-specific">📊 Stakeholder Quic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role in HD03231</th><th align="center">Position</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong></td><td>Co-signatory FM</td><td align="center">Strong support</td><td>Proposition signature; UD press release</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong></td><td>Co-signatory PM</td><td align="center">Strong support</td><td>Proposition signature</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UU Ordförande</strong></td><td>Committee lead</td><td align="center">Expected support</td><td>Cross-party alignment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SÄPO</strong></td><td>Security implementation</td><td align="center">Neutral/supportive</td><td>Enhanced mandate needed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NCSC</strong></td><td>Cyber threat response</td><td align="center">Neutral/supportive</td><td>Elevated alert protocol needed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab</strong></td><td>Defence industry beneficiary</td><td align="center">Support</td><td>Reconstruction positioning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia/GRU/SVR</strong></td><td>Primary adversary</td><td align="center"><strong>HOSTILE</strong></td><td>Documented retaliatory cyber pattern post-ICC warrant</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-to-monitor">🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-to-monitor">🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3755,7 +3755,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-to-monitor">🔮 Forward Indicators to Monitor<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Watch Period</th><th>Significance if Triggered</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UD announces enhanced security protocols</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>Confirms institutional awareness of elevated threat posture</td></tr><tr><td>Russian disinformation campaign targeting Sweden on Ukraine tribunal</td><td align="center">Sep 2026</td><td>Confirms T2 threat vector active; note MSB/StratCom responses</td></tr><tr><td>APT29 spearphishing targeting UU members</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>T1 threat active; NCSC advisory expected</td></tr><tr><td>UK/France announce tribunal funding contributions</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td><td>Reduces Swedish relative financial burden; increases political momentum</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal Statute enters into force</td><td align="center">2026-2027</td><td>Operational phase triggers; Swedish ratification required before this</td></tr><tr><td>First indictment issued</td><td align="center">2027-2028</td><td>Maximum political salience moment; tests party cohesion on second vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3787,11 +3787,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Situate Sweden's founding membership in the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine within comparative practice across: (1) <strong>aggression-accountability jurisprudence</strong> (historic and contemporary tribunals); (2) <strong>Russia-accountability foreign-policy posture</strong> (Nordic + EU benchmarking); (3) <strong>post-accountability-action hybrid-threat exposure</strong> patterns.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>Structured comparative-politics analysis (most-similar / most-different design) · Heuer's <em>Psychology of Intelligence Analysis</em> §9 · Mill's Methods of Agreement / Difference</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Calibration</strong></td><td>Each comparison labelled with <code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> based on source depth</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data sources</strong></td><td>World Bank WDI, NATO Public Diplomacy Division, Council of Europe Treaty Office, SIPRI Military Expenditure DB, Mandiant/Google TAG APT reports 2022–2025, academic literature on Nuremberg/SCSL/STL/ICTY</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 1 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Analogous Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared">🧭 Section 1 — Aggression-Accountability Architecture: How Analogous Tribunals Have Fared<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--aggression-accountability-architecture-how-analogous-tribunals-have-fared"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: HD03231 creates the <strong>first dedicated tribunal for the crime of aggression since Nuremberg (1945–46)</strong>. How did earlier institutional analogues perform — and what does their trajectory tell us about HD03231?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents">Historical Benchmarks (≥ 5 Jurisdictional Precedents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents">Historical Benchmarks (≥ 5 Jurisdictional Precedents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-historical-benchmarks--5-jurisdictional-precedents">Historical Benchm
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Key comparative insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Of the 8 benchmarked aggression/atrocity tribunals, <strong>zero have failed jurisdictionally once operational</strong> — the primary risk is not institutional collapse but <strong>slow tempo</strong>. ECCC averaged 5.3 years per conviction; ICTY averaged 3.8 years; SCSL averaged 1.2 years (exceptional efficiency, owing to Sierra Leonean state cooperation). HD03231's tribunal operating without Russian-state cooperation and requiring evidence-gathering from active-conflict Ukraine territory implies a projected <strong>4–7 year tempo per conviction</strong>, with first indictments likely H2 2027 and first verdicts no earlier than 2029–2030.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes">Head-of-State Immunity — Comparative Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes">Head-of-State Immunity — Comparative Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3897,11 +3897,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-head-of-state-immunity--comparative-outcomes">Head-of-State Immunity
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Case</th><th>Outcome</th><th>Signal for Putin indictment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Slobodan Milošević (ICTY, 2002–06)</td><td>Died during trial; no conviction</td><td>Procedural mortality risk</td></tr><tr><td>Charles Taylor (SCSL, 2006–12)</td><td>Convicted 50 years</td><td><strong>Direct positive precedent</strong> — hybrid tribunal can convict a sitting/former head of state <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td>Omar al-Bashir (ICC, 2009+)</td><td>Arrest warrant outstanding 16 years; state-cooperation failures</td><td>Negative precedent — political-will decay over time <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td>Vladimir Putin (ICC, 2023+)</td><td>Arrest warrant; no movement</td><td>Direct peer case; HD03231 tribunal is the <strong>aggression-crime complement</strong> (ICC covers war crimes + children; tribunal covers aggression) <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position">🧭 Section 2 — Nordic &#x26; EU Comparative: Which States Do What, and Where Does Sweden Position?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position">🧭 Section 2 — Nordic &#x26; EU Comparative: Which States Do What, and Where Does Sweden Position?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--nordic--eu-comparative-which-states-do-what-and-where-does-sweden-position"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: Which comparable European states have taken formal judicial-accountability positions on Russian aggression against Ukraine — and where does Sweden's founding-member status sit in the gradient?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design">Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design">Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3957,7 +3957,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-baseline-most-similar-design">Nordic Baseline (Most-Similar De
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Tribunal membership</th><th align="center">NATO accession</th><th align="center">RSF press-freedom rank 2025</th><th align="center">SIPRI 2024 mil-exp % GDP</th><th>Posture summary</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Founding member (HD03231)</strong></td><td align="center">March 2024</td><td align="center">4th</td><td align="center">≥ 2.0 % (NATO target met)</td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneur position</strong> (innovation pattern)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 Norway</strong></td><td align="center">Member (pre-accession track)</td><td align="center">1949</td><td align="center">1st</td><td align="center">2.23 %</td><td>Follower pattern — strong support but not founding</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">Member</td><td align="center">1949</td><td align="center">3rd</td><td align="center">2.37 %</td><td>Follower pattern — with F-35 donations to Ukraine (2023+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 Finland</strong></td><td align="center">Member</td><td align="center">April 2023</td><td align="center">5th</td><td align="center">2.41 %</td><td>Follower pattern — NATO accession is primary positioning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇮🇸 Iceland</strong></td><td align="center">Member (supports via CoE)</td><td align="center">1949 (no military)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">N/A (no armed forces)</td><td>Diplomatic support only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Comparative takeaway (Nordic cluster)</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's <strong>founding</strong> status differentiates it from Nordic peers. Denmark and Norway are politically fully aligned but have not taken institutional-founding positions. This is the <strong>innovation pattern</strong>: Sweden assumes a norm-entrepreneurship role analogous to its 1966 Palme government's international-mediation tradition. It is also the <strong>exposure pattern</strong>: Sweden's visibility in Russian targeting taxonomy rises relative to Nordic peers.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design">EU Baseline (Most-Different Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design">EU Baseline (Most-Different Design)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4028,7 +4028,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-baseline-most-different-design">EU Baseline (Most-Different Design
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Tribunal posture</th><th align="center">NATO position</th><th>Historical Russia-posture</th><th>Comparative note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 Germany</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member (with Sweden)</td><td align="center">1955</td><td>Historic Ostpolitik → post-2022 Zeitenwende</td><td>Sweden's most similar large-state partner in the tribunal architecture; Germany's EUR 100 B Bundeswehr special fund parallels Swedish defence uplift <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member (Hague host)</td><td align="center">1949</td><td>Post-MH17 (2014) accountability activism</td><td>The Netherlands is the <strong>operational</strong> anchor (Hague seat); Sweden is a <strong>founding-legitimacy</strong> anchor <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 France</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">1949 (partial withdrawal 1966–2009)</td><td>Traditional diplomatic engagement with Russia</td><td>Active founding-member participation represents a departure from French Russia-hedging pattern <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇵🇱 Poland</strong></td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">1999</td><td>Historical enmity; front-line state</td><td>Strongest political-will member; provides evidence-gathering infrastructure via front-line access <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇪🇪 Estonia / 🇱🇻 Latvia / 🇱🇹 Lithuania</strong></td><td align="center">Members</td><td align="center">2004</td><td>Existential-threat framing</td><td>Highest per-capita commitment; already targeted by Russian cyber (Sandworm operations 2022–2025) — <strong>direct peer case for Sweden's expected targeting profile</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇭🇺 Hungary</strong></td><td align="center">Non-participant (ambiguous)</td><td align="center">1999</td><td>Orbán-era Russia-friendliness</td><td>The <strong>anti-innovation</strong> posture; highlights EU-wide fracture lines on Russia policy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇮🇹 Italy</strong></td><td align="center">Participant (non-founding)</td><td align="center">1949</td><td>Historic ENI-era Russian energy ties</td><td>Mid-ground position; less exposed than Sweden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇪🇸 Spain</strong></td><td align="center">Participant (non-founding)</td><td align="center">1982</td><td>Traditional passivity on Russia</td><td>Mid-ground; similar to Italy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>EU takeaway</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Within EU, Sweden joins a <strong>founding cluster of 8 states</strong> (SE, DE, NL, FR, PL, EE, LV, LT) at the highest political-will tier. This places Sweden in the <strong>top decile</strong> of EU Russia-accountability posture — a position aligned with the three Baltic states that are already documented APT targets. Sweden's threat exposure over 2026–2028 will resemble the Baltic pattern more than the Nordic pattern.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative">Nordic-vs-Baltic Targeting-Rate Comparison (2022–2025, indicative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative">Nordic-vs-Baltic Targeting-Rate Comparison (2022–2025, indicative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4102,11 +4102,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-vs-baltic-targeting-rate-comparison-20222025-indicative">Nordi
 <p><strong>Analytical finding</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Pre-HD03231 Sweden's targeting profile matched the <strong>mid-Nordic</strong> pattern. Post-HD03231 the founding-member signal combined with the NATO-accession recency moves Sweden toward the <strong>Baltic-peer pattern</strong> over 24 months. The executive-brief R1 risk score (20/25 CRITICAL) is calibrated to this convergence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation">🧭 Section 3 — Economic Resilience Against Russian Economic Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation">🧭 Section 3 — Economic Resilience Against Russian Economic Retaliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--economic-resilience-against-russian-economic-retaliation"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Context: Post-HD03231, which Russian economic-retaliation vectors are realistic, and how resilient is the Swedish economy relative to peers?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024">Economic Baseline (World Bank WDI 2024)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024">Economic Baseline (World Bank WDI 2024)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4192,7 +4192,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-economic-baseline-world-bank-wdi-2024">Economic Baseline (World Bank
 <li>NATO Article 5 security umbrella reduces asymmetric-economic-coercion risk (Russia cannot isolate Sweden without confronting alliance)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard">🎯 Where Sweden Innovates, Follows, Diverges (Tier-C Required Scorecard)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard">🎯 Where Sweden Innovates, Follows, Diverges (Tier-C Required Scorecard)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4256,8 +4256,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-tier-c-required-scorecard">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden's position</th><th align="center">Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Founding-member status in aggression tribunal</td><td>First Nordic + Baltic founding-tier participant</td><td align="center"><strong>🆕 INNOVATES</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Nuremberg-framing in official rhetoric</td><td>FM Stenergard explicit references</td><td align="center"><strong>🆕 INNOVATES</strong> (Germany is more cautious with Nuremberg framing for historical reasons)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional commitment depth (two-reading grundlag process)</td><td>Follows German and Dutch parliamentary-ratification patterns</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Defence-spending compliance (≥ 2 % GDP NATO target)</td><td>Met 2024; aligned with NATO commitment</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Cyber/hybrid-defence institutional architecture (NCSC, SÄPO, MSB, FRA)</td><td>Existing institutions; no HD03231-specific upgrade</td><td align="center">⚠️ <strong>DIVERGES</strong> (from Baltic-state model which treated NATO accession as catalyst for institutional uplift; Sweden treated NATO accession and now tribunal accession as <strong>communications</strong> events not institutional-design events)</td></tr><tr><td>Tribunal security-posture accompaniment</td><td><strong>Absent</strong> — HD03231 contains no operational-security rider</td><td align="center">⚠️ <strong>DIVERGES</strong> (Estonia's 2004 NATO accession was accompanied by a formal cyber-defence strategy update; Sweden has produced no equivalent)</td></tr><tr><td>Trans-Atlantic alignment (US-UK-FR coordination in tribunal)</td><td>Strong European coordination; ambiguous US-cooperation signal</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> European pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Information-warfare doctrine and MSB coordination</td><td>Existing doctrine; not updated for tribunal context</td><td align="center">⚠️ <strong>DIVERGES</strong> (Finland's 2022 NATO-accession included formal disinformation-resilience programme update)</td></tr><tr><td>Defence-industry coordination with tribunal signalling</td><td>Saab/BAE Bofors/Nammo commercial pipelines support the strategic line</td><td align="center">✅ <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> (coherent with foreign-policy direction)</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial independence and ICL contribution (attorneys, academics)</td><td>Swedish legal community has strong international-law pedigree (Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration, Raoul Wallenberg Institute)</td><td align="center"><strong>🆕 INNOVATES</strong> (provides specific jurist talent pool)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Summary scorecard</strong>: Sweden <strong>innovates</strong> in 3 dimensions (founding status, Nuremberg rhetoric, jurist talent), <strong>follows</strong> in 3 (constitutional process, defence spending, EU coordination), and <strong>diverges</strong> in 3 (cyber/hybrid institutional accompaniment, security-posture rider, information-warfare doctrine update) — with the <strong>divergences being the systematic policy-gap signal</strong> that the executive-brief flags as the editorially highest-value finding.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle">🌐 Section 4 — Ukraine Reconstruction Market Benchmarking (Defence-Industry Angle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access">Reconstruction Market Size and Defence-Industry Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle">🌐 Section 4 — Ukraine Reconstruction Market Benchmarking (Defence-Industry Angle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--ukraine-reconstruction-market-benchmarking-defence-industry-angle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access">Reconstruction Market Size and Defence-Industry Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4294,7 +4294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reconstruction-market-size-and-defence-industry-access">Reconstructio
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th align="center">Estimate (EUR B)</th><th align="center">Defence-industry share</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>World Bank Rapid Damage Assessment (2024)</td><td align="center">486</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Civilian reconstruction-focused</td></tr><tr><td>European Commission Ukraine Facility (2024–27)</td><td align="center">50</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Budget-support + investment</td></tr><tr><td>EU ReArm package (2025–29)</td><td align="center">150–800</td><td align="center">≥ 30 %</td><td>Includes Ukraine-support budget lines</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine Business Compact (industry initiative)</td><td align="center">500+ cumulative 10-year</td><td align="center">≥ 20 % (defence + dual-use)</td><td>Includes air-defence, ground-based replenishment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231">Swedish Defence-Industry Positioning (Post-HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231">Swedish Defence-Industry Positioning (Post-HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4339,7 +4339,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-swedish-defence-industry-positioning-post-hd03231">Swedish Defence-In
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Company</th><th>Key product</th><th>Ukraine relationship</th><th>HD03231 signal benefit</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Saab AB</strong></td><td>Gripen E/F; Carl-Gustaf M4; AT4; RBS 70 NG</td><td>Carl-Gustaf confirmed Ukraine donation; Gripen F discussion ongoing</td><td>Sustained institutional signal = procurement-pipeline credibility <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>BAE Systems Bofors</strong></td><td>Archer SPH; BONUS guided artillery; CV90 IFV</td><td>Archer donated 2022; CV90 procurement pipeline with CZ/SK/UA</td><td>Reconstruction-phase armour procurement viable <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nammo</strong> (SE-NO)</td><td>Medium-calibre ammunition; rocket motors</td><td>Supplies to Ukraine via bilateral channels</td><td>EU Ammunition Production Act alignment <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ericsson</strong> (dual-use)</td><td>5G/critical comms</td><td>Partial exit from Russia 2022; Ukraine comms re-entry</td><td>Reconstruction-phase telecom infrastructure <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>SSAB</strong></td><td>Armour-grade steel (Hardox, Armox)</td><td>Base-material supplier to armour manufacturers</td><td>Reconstruction industrial base <code>[LOW]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Reconstruction-market comparative</strong>: Sweden's defence-industrial base is <strong>mid-tier in absolute terms</strong> (smaller than Germany's Rheinmetall/KMW, UK's BAE, France's Thales/Dassault) but <strong>top-tier in per-capita terms</strong> (comparable to Israel in technology-intensity). HD03231's founding-member signalling improves Saab/BAE Bofors/Nammo competitive positioning against Korean, Turkish, and Polish competitors in the same segment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-run-comparative-alignment">🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-run-comparative-alignment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-run-comparative-alignment">🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-run-comparative-alignment"></a></h3>
 <p>This comparative-international file aligns with and cites:</p>
 
 
@@ -4368,12 +4368,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-run-comparative-alignment">🔎 Cross-Run Comparative Alignmen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling run</th><th>Comparative file</th><th>Alignment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>realtime-1434/comparative-international.md</code></td><td>Nuremberg → Hague → Stockholm timeline</td><td>This dossier extends with <strong>Baltic-peer targeting convergence</strong> analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>monthly-review/comparative-international.md</code> (2026-04-19)</td><td>30-day Nordic + EU benchmarking</td><td>This dossier sharpens for the <strong>Russia/cyber/defence</strong> cluster</td></tr><tr><td><code>weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code> (2026-04-18)</td><td>Week-16 Nordic economic + defence snapshot</td><td>Confirms the 2024 economic baselines used in Section 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links-2">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links-2"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md">Executive Brief</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md">Scenario Analysis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 · <strong>Data freshness</strong>: World Bank WDI 2024 edition · SIPRI 2024 edition · NATO 2024–25 expenditure reports</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4405,7 +4405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:35 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>political-classification-guide; Riksdagsmonitor policy-domain taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification">🏷️ Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification">🏷️ Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4437,7 +4437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification">🏷️ Document Classification<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Type</th><th align="center">Committee (Receiving)</th><th>Policy Domains</th><th align="center">Priority Tier</th><th align="center">Retention</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03231</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td><td align="center">Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td><td>Foreign policy; International law; Security/Defence; Ukraine</td><td align="center"><strong>Tier 1 — Critical</strong></td><td align="center">7 years</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232</strong></td><td>Proposition (Prop. 2025/26:232)</td><td align="center">Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td><td>Foreign policy; International law; Ukraine; Reparations</td><td align="center"><strong>Tier 1 — Critical</strong></td><td align="center">7 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--policy-domain-classification">📚 Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--policy-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">📚 Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4487,7 +4487,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--policy-domain-classification">📚 Policy Domain Classification<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th align="center">Primary/Secondary</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Committee</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>International Criminal Law</strong></td><td align="center">PRIMARY</td><td>Special Tribunal founding; aggression crime jurisdiction</td><td align="center">UU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Foreign Policy</strong></td><td align="center">PRIMARY</td><td>Sweden's international commitments; NATO context; CoE EPA</td><td align="center">UU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security and Defence</strong></td><td align="center">PRIMARY</td><td>Russian hybrid threat elevation; SÄPO/NCSC mandate</td><td align="center">FöU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rule of Law / Human Rights</strong></td><td align="center">SECONDARY</td><td>Accountability for war crimes; ICL norms</td><td align="center">KU (adjacent)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finance / Budget</strong></td><td align="center">TERTIARY</td><td>EPA assessed dues (SEK 30-80M/year)</td><td align="center">FiU (adjacent)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Affairs</strong></td><td align="center">SECONDARY</td><td>EU foreign-policy alignment; EEAS coordination</td><td align="center">EUN (adjacent)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--access-classification">🔒 Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--access-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-access-classification">🔒 Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4511,7 +4511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--access-classification">🔒 Access Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>PUBLIC</strong></td><td>HD03231 is a tabled Riksdag proposition — publicly available</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis sensitivity</strong></td><td>MEDIUM — security analysis of threat escalation contains operational information that should be handled carefully</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Distribution</strong></td><td>Open publication on Riksdagsmonitor; defence/security caveats noted in article</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-committee-routing">🏛️ Committee Routing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-committee-routing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-routing">🏛️ Committee Routing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-routing"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4549,7 +4549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-committee-routing">🏛️ Committee Routing<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Committee</th><th align="center">Expected Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Primary review</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Advisory review</strong></td><td>Försvarsutskottet (FöU)</td><td align="center">Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Budget impact</strong></td><td>Finansutskottet (FiU) — if dues require appropriation</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>First Riksdag vote</strong></td><td>Kammaren</td><td align="center">Q3-Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Second vote (post-election)</strong></td><td>Kammaren (new composition)</td><td align="center">Q1-Q2 2027</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--content-classification-labels">📊 Content Classification Labels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--content-classification-labels"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-content-classification-labels">📊 Content Classification Labels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-content-classification-labels"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4581,7 +4581,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--content-classification-labels">📊 Content Classification Labels<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Label</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Topic tags</strong></td><td>Ukraine; Russia; International Criminal Law; Special Tribunal; Aggression; Nuremberg; Security; Hybrid Warfare; Cyber; Defence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Named entities</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard; Ulf Kristersson; Vladimir Putin; Volodymyr Zelensky; Valery Gerasimov; Council of Europe; Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Geographic scope</strong></td><td>Sweden; Ukraine; Russia; The Hague; European Union; Global</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Time horizon</strong></td><td>Immediate (ratification 2026-27); Medium (tribunal operational 2027-28); Long-term (prosecution 2028+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4613,7 +4613,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>XRF-ID</strong></td><td>XRF-2026-04-19-DI</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 18:36 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>Cross-document intelligence map; reference ecosystem</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary Document</strong></td><td>HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Validity Window</strong></td><td>Valid until 2026-05-03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-relationships">🔗 Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-relationships"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationships">🔗 Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationships"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     HD03231["📜 HD03231&#x3C;br/>Prop. 2025/26:231&#x3C;br/>Ukraine Aggression Tribunal&#x3C;br/>2026-04-16"]
     HD03232["📜 HD03232&#x3C;br/>Prop. 2025/26:232&#x3C;br/>International Compensation&#x3C;br/>Commission (Ukraine)&#x3C;br/>2026-04-16"]
@@ -4662,7 +4662,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-relationships">🔗 Document Relationships<a class="" aria-
     style COE_EPA fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style NATO_ART5 fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--reference-documents--citations">📚 Reference Documents &#x26; Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--reference-documents--citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-documents--citations">📚 Reference Documents &#x26; Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-documents--citations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4724,7 +4724,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--reference-documents--citations">📚 Reference Documents &#x26; Cita
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reference</th><th>Type</th><th>Relevance to HD03231</th><th align="center">Access</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></td><td>Prior AI analysis (L2+)</td><td>Gold-standard per-document analysis; this deep-inspection upgrades to L3</td><td align="center">Local</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/threat-analysis.md</code></td><td>Prior threat analysis</td><td>T6 (Russian hybrid) at MEDIUM-HIGH/HIGH first established here</td><td align="center">Local</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>Prior synthesis</td><td>HD03231 as "Secondary" in realtime-1434; now LEAD in deep-inspection</td><td align="center">Local</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf">ICC Rome Statute Art. 8bis</a></td><td>International treaty</td><td>Defines "crime of aggression"; Special Tribunal fills gap where ICC cannot act</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.coe.int">Council of Europe EPA framework</a></td><td>Institutional framework</td><td>HD03231 ratifies Sweden's accession to EPA structure</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.rscsl.org">SCSL Statute (2002)</a></td><td>Precedent</td><td>Hybrid international tribunal design; in absentia procedures</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.nato.int">NATO Art. 5 (Washington Treaty)</a></td><td>Strategic context</td><td>Sweden's collective-defence anchor; changes threat calculus</td><td align="center">External</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.msb.se">MSB Hotbildsanalys 2025</a></td><td>Security context</td><td>Current Swedish security posture vs Russian hybrid threats</td><td align="center">External</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-evolution-tracking">🔄 Document Evolution Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-evolution-tracking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-evolution-tracking">🔄 Document Evolution Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-evolution-tracking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4750,7 +4750,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-evolution-tracking">🔄 Document Evolution Tracking<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Version</th><th>Date</th><th align="center">Analysis Depth</th><th>Key Changes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Initial analysis</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td align="center">L2+ Strategic</td><td>Security dimensions identified; T6 flagged MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Deep-inspection</strong></td><td><strong>2026-04-19</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>L3 Intelligence Grade</strong></td><td>Full Kill Chain; Diamond Model; Attack Tree; 8-stakeholder SWOT; risk scored 20/25 for R1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map">🌐 Related Swedish Foreign Policy Instruments (Context Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map">🌐 Related Swedish Foreign Policy Instruments (Context Map)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4788,7 +4788,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-swedish-foreign-policy-instruments-context-map">🌐 Related
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Instrument</th><th>Date</th><th>Relationship to HD03231</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>NATO accession</strong></td><td>March 2024</td><td>Security anchor; changes Russia threat calculus for HD03231 targeting</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ukraine aid package</strong> (annual)</td><td>2022–2026</td><td>Policy continuity; HD03231 is legal-institutional complement to aid</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03232 (Reparations Commission)</strong></td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Companion proposition; EUR 260B immobilised Russian assets framework</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Swedish humanitarian aid to Ukraine</strong></td><td>2022–2026</td><td>Humanitarian track; HD03231 is accountability track</td></tr><tr><td><strong>GDPR/UD data protection</strong></td><td>Ongoing</td><td>UD data security is now relevant to tribunal planning security</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4819,7 +4819,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 <p>This file is the self-audit for the first <code>deep-inspection</code> run designated to carry the <strong>Tier-C 14-artifact reference-grade requirement</strong>. All prior deep-inspection runs (2026-04-03, 2026-04-15) produced the 9-core-artifact set only; this run is the first to cross the 14-artifact threshold after explicit PR reviewer guidance on 2026-04-19 (see PR comment 4276581622).</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scope-of-this-reflection">🎯 Scope of This Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scope-of-this-reflection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scope-of-this-reflection">🎯 Scope of This Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scope-of-this-reflection"></a></h3>
 <p>This reflection audits <strong>both</strong> the agentic workflow that produced the run (news-article-generator.md with deep-inspection article_types parameter) <strong>and</strong> the analytic tradecraft inside the resulting package. Findings are categorised as:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>✅ Preserve</strong> — worked well, should be propagated via codification</li>
@@ -4827,25 +4827,25 @@ <h2 id="rm--scope-of-this-reflection">🎯 Scope of This Reflection<a class="" a
 <li><strong>🔴 Systemic</strong> — requires a workflow-level or methodology-level change</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held">1. Focus-Topic Alignment Gate (existing rule held)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates">✅ What Worked (Preserve in Templates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-preserve-in-templates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held">1. Focus-Topic Alignment Gate (existing rule held)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-focus-topic-alignment-gate-existing-rule-held"></a></h4>
 <p>The pre-existing <code>focus_topic</code> gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"DEEP-INSPECTION TOPIC-DATA ALIGNMENT GATE") correctly prevented drift. <code>focus_topic="Russia, cyber threat, defence, Ukraina"</code> matched HD03231 primary content — gate passed → article generation proceeded correctly. <strong>No 2026-04-15 "cyber article from migration data" anti-pattern repeat</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Already codified; retain as-is. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing">2. Sibling-Run Cross-Referencing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing">2. Sibling-Run Cross-Referencing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sibling-run-cross-referencing"></a></h4>
 <p>The baseline synthesis correctly cited <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code> as reference dossier, inheriting R1 Bayesian prior (16/25 weighted for Russian hybrid retaliation) and upgrading it to 20/25 based on HD03231-specific factors (founding-member visibility, security-silence in the proposition text). This is the pattern that Tier-C §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation" requires.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Make sibling-run citations MANDATORY for all deep-inspection runs. Add to news-article-generator.md §"Step 1.5" as a 🔴 blocking gate: every deep-inspection run MUST cite ≥ 1 sibling run from the prior 7 days (weekly-review, realtime-monitor, or another deep-inspection). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file">3. Per-Document L3 Analysis File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file">3. Per-Document L3 Analysis File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-per-document-l3-analysis-file"></a></h4>
 <p><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code> (178 lines, 14 KB) contained 6-lens analysis, STRIDE, evidence table, and forward indicators. This is the L3 intelligence-grade depth tier the methodology calls for.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Retain L3 standard; document the evidence-count minima (≥ 3 evidence points per claim) already in template. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting">4. Security-Lens Significance Re-Weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting">4. Security-Lens Significance Re-Weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-lens-significance-re-weighting"></a></h4>
 <p>The synthesis-summary applied a security-specific weighting that elevated HD03231 from raw 9 → weighted 11.5/10 (exceeding the raw-ceiling by design to reflect the pronounced security-lens significance). This honoured the focus_topic without fabricating news value.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Document the "Security-Lens Weighting v1.0" multipliers in <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Rule 5 as a recognised companion to the DIW v1.0 framework. <code>[MEDIUM-HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage">5. Color-Coded Mermaid Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage">5. Color-Coded Mermaid Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-color-coded-mermaid-coverage"></a></h4>
 <p>Every one of the 9 initial artifacts contained ≥ 1 color-coded Mermaid diagram with real dok_ids and actor names. Extended Tier-C files (README, executive-brief, scenario-analysis, comparative-international, methodology-reflection) add another 3–5 diagrams to the package.</p>
 <p><strong>Codify as</strong>: Already a mandatory standard; retain. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4888,7 +4888,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Note on manifest retrofit</strong>: This manifest is the retrofit data-provenance file added during the Tier-C reference-grade upgrade (2026-04-19 post-review). The downstream analyses in this package were already built on the documented MCP queries below; this file formalises the chain-of-custody.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4956,7 +4956,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-sources">🔌 Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>MCP Tool</th><th align="center">Status</th><th align="center">Count</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdag propositioner (2025/26)</td><td><code>get_propositioner({rm: "2025/26"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232 retrieved</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag document by ID</td><td><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD03231"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Full text + metadata fetched</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag document by ID</td><td><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD03232"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Companion (reparations commission)</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag committee calendar</td><td><code>get_calendar_events({from: "2026-04-19", tom: "2026-06-30", org: "UU"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">UU agenda for tribunal processing</td></tr><tr><td>Regering press releases</td><td><code>search_regering({query: "tribunal ukraina", dateFrom: "2026-04-15", dateTo: "2026-04-19"})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">2 press releases (UD)</td></tr><tr><td>Government document content</td><td><code>get_g0v_document_content(...)</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">UD tribunal framework press release</td></tr><tr><td>Sync status</td><td><code>get_sync_status({})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Status: live; last sync fresh</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data</td><td><code>get-economic-data({countryCode:"SE",...})</code></td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">GDP growth, inflation, defence % GDP</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data</td><td>Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI)</td><td align="center">✅ Live</td><td align="center">Defence spending, FDI net inflows</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--primary-documents-retrieved">📄 Primary Documents Retrieved<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--primary-documents-retrieved"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-documents-retrieved">📄 Primary Documents Retrieved<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-documents-retrieved"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4999,7 +4999,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--primary-documents-retrieved">📄 Primary Documents Retrieved<a clas
 <li>Companion fiscal/legal measure without direct security vector → ×1.00 baseline</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain">🧭 Reference Analyses (Cross-Run Evidence Chain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain">🧭 Reference Analyses (Cross-Run Evidence Chain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain"></a></h3>
 <p>This deep-inspection package builds on and explicitly cites the following sibling runs within the 72-hour lookback window:</p>
 
 
@@ -5038,7 +5038,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--reference-analyses-cross-run-evidence-chain">🧭 Reference Analyses
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling Run</th><th>Files Used</th><th>Evidence Carried Forward</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>risk-assessment.md</code> (R1 = 16/25 Russian hybrid retaliation), <code>threat-analysis.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Gold-standard HD03231 strategic framing; baseline R1 Bayesian prior</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> (Week 16), <code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td>Week-16 lead-story decision hierarchy; HD01UFöU3 NATO eFP deployment context (1,200 troops to Finland)</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, <code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td>30-day forward vote calendar; watchpoint reconciliation baseline</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td>30-day retrospective; benchmark exemplar for Tier-C scaling</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-15/deep-inspection/</code></td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>Prior deep-inspection structural template</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-excluded-scope-control">🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Control)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-excluded-scope-control"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-excluded-scope-control">🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Control)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-excluded-scope-control"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5070,7 +5070,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--documents-excluded-scope-control">🚫 Documents Excluded (Scope Con
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>Covered by realtime-1434 (constitutional package); off-topic for Russia/cyber focus</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Spring fiscal trilogy — covered in week-16 review</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Juvenile-offender package — off-topic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Migration trio — off-topic</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>Housing/AML — off-topic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--world-bank-economic-context-captured">📊 World Bank Economic Context (Captured)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--world-bank-economic-context-captured"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-world-bank-economic-context-captured">📊 World Bank Economic Context (Captured)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-world-bank-economic-context-captured"></a></h3>
 <p>Stored in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/economic-data.json"><code>economic-data.json</code></a>. Indicators matched to detected policy domains (defence, foreign affairs, hybrid threat):</p>
 
 
@@ -5119,7 +5119,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--world-bank-economic-context-captured">📊 World Bank Economic Conte
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">SE 2024</th><th align="center">DK 2024</th><th align="center">NO 2024</th><th align="center">FI 2024</th><th>Usage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP growth (% annual)</td><td align="center">0.82 %</td><td align="center">3.50 %</td><td align="center">2.10 %</td><td align="center">1.04 %</td><td>Economic-resilience baseline for sanctions absorption</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation (CPI, % annual)</td><td align="center">2.836 %</td><td align="center">1.95 %</td><td align="center">3.58 %</td><td align="center">1.28 %</td><td>Hybrid-war narrative sensitivity</td></tr><tr><td>Military expenditure (% GDP)</td><td align="center">≥ 2.0 % (NATO target)</td><td align="center">2.37 %</td><td align="center">2.23 %</td><td align="center">2.41 %</td><td>Defence posture context for tribunal signalling</td></tr><tr><td>FDI net inflows ($)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Economic-retaliation exposure baseline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-freshness--staleness-rules">🕐 Data Freshness &#x26; Staleness Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-freshness--staleness-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-freshness--staleness-rules">🕐 Data Freshness &#x26; Staleness Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness--staleness-rules"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03231 publication date</strong>: 2026-04-16 (Regeringen)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03231 tabling in Riksdag</strong>: 2026-04-16 (seriously close to this analysis — 3 days)</li>
@@ -5128,7 +5128,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-freshness--staleness-rules">🕐 Data Freshness &#x26; Stalenes
 <li><strong>Validity window</strong>: Until 2026-05-03 (earliest Utrikesutskottet betänkande window) or event-driven refresh (Lagrådet yttrande, SÄPO threat-bulletin update)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custody<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance--chain-of-custody"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5176,7 +5176,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--provenance--chain-of-custody">🔗 Provenance &#x26; Chain-of-Custod
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Step</th><th>Tool / Responsible</th><th align="center">Timestamp (UTC)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MCP health gate + <code>get_sync_status</code></td><td>agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:18</td></tr><tr><td>Document query batch (HD03231, HD03232)</td><td>agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:20</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data fetch</td><td>agent</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:24</td></tr><tr><td>Per-file analysis (HD03231-analysis.md L3)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:30–18:40</td></tr><tr><td>9-core artifact synthesis</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 18:40–18:52</td></tr><tr><td>Tier-C reference-grade upgrade (this version)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7 (post-review session)</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 19:00+</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-reference to sibling runs (realtime-1434, weekly-review, month-ahead)</td><td>Copilot Opus 4.7</td><td align="center">2026-04-19 19:10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quality-gates-applied">🧪 Quality Gates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quality-gates-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-gates-applied">🧪 Quality Gates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-gates-applied"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ 9-Artifact Completeness Gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"9 REQUIRED Analysis Artifacts")</li>
 <li>✅ Tier-C 14-Artifact Gate (SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §"14 REQUIRED Artifacts for AGGREGATION Workflows" — extended to <code>deep-inspection</code> 2026-04-19)</li>
@@ -5189,6 +5189,24 @@ <h2 id="rm--quality-gates-applied">🧪 Quality Gates Applied<a class="" aria-hi
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-03 or event-driven · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/deep-inspection/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -5227,7 +5245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:03.449Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:24.853Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html b/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html
index 98657784b2..4f07410506 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden Month-Ahead Strategic Outlook (19 April → 19 May 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.690Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.103Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.690Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.103Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden Month-Ahead Strategic Outlook (19 April → 19 May 2026)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:03.690Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden Month-Ahead Strategic Outlook (19 April → 19 May 2026)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:25.103Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -239,12 +239,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 4 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision framed against April–May 2026 Riksdag calendar</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>30 days (pre-summer recess) · 90 days (pre-election) · post-2026-09-13 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Author</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent, James Pether Sörling editorial responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 Rules 0–8 + DIW v1.0 + Bayesian scenario priors</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream ingested</strong></td><td>2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 sibling daily analyses (evening-analysis, realtime-*, week-ahead, weekly-review)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>With 147 days until the 13 September 2026 general election, the Swedish Riksdag enters its most legislatively compressed 30-day window of the 2025/26 term.</strong> PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> is delivering a <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> — Vårproposition <code>HD03100</code> + Vårändringsbudget <code>HD0399</code> + Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code> (82-öre fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) — into a macro backdrop of <strong>0.82 % 2024 GDP growth</strong> (Nordic-bottom vs Denmark 3.48 %, Norway 2.10 %, Finland 0.42 %; World Bank) and <strong>8.69 % 2025 unemployment</strong> (the Nordic-highest since 2021). <strong>Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> advances the <strong>Ukraine accountability architecture</strong> (<code>HD03231</code> Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression + <code>HD03232</code> Reparations Commission) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg, with Sweden as founding member. <strong>Justice / Migration ministers</strong> table a coordinated <strong>Migration + Criminal-Justice Blitz</strong>: new reception law (<code>HD03229</code>), stricter deportation rules (<code>HD03235</code>), inhibition orders (<code>HD01SfU22</code>), juvenile tightening (<code>HD03246</code>), and paid police training (<code>HD03237</code>) — met by <strong>7+ coordinated V/MP/C/S counter-motions</strong> structured as an ECHR-litigation predicate. <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet</strong> advances two <em>vilande</em> grundlag amendments (<code>HD01KU32</code> accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> digital-evidence search/seizure) — their <strong>2nd reading is embedded in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag</strong>, making the September election a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency. <strong>HD01UFöU3</strong> (NATO Finland eFP, 1,200 Swedish troops) is imminent for chamber vote (<strong>week of 2026-04-20 → 24</strong>) — Sweden's first operational NATO output. The cluster reveals a <strong>pre-election maximalist agenda</strong> across fiscal stimulus, migration closure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, and constitutional restructuring. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>D1</strong></td><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong> for the 19-Apr → 19-May news cycle</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Top-20 Ranking — Spring Fiscal Trilogy composite 98/96/95 ⇒ lead; Migration blitz ranks 94/93 ⇒ co-prominent; Ukraine tribunal 90/89 ⇒ foreign-policy lead</td><td align="right"><strong>Immediate</strong> (daily throughout horizon)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D2</strong></td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO + foreign-policy commentariat engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 + R6 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T1 + T2 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §C2</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33 (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D3</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition-stability + ECHR-litigation threat monitoring</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T1 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R1/R5/R6 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §Wildcards W2</td><td align="right">Continuous; heightened post-2026-05-01</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-editors-need-in-60-seconds">📐 What Editors Need in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-editors-need-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-editors-need-in-60-seconds">📐 What Editors Need in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-editors-need-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>The economic-stewardship story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy.</strong> Sweden's 0.82 % GDP growth (lowest in Nordics) + 8.69 % unemployment is the <strong>single largest empirical vulnerability</strong> in the Tidö-coalition economic narrative. Fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief is fiscally significant (≈ SEK 40–60 B net stimulus estimate) and politically targeted at rural/car-dependent voters who align with SD base. Nordic benchmark: Denmark + Norway retain carbon-pricing discipline; Sweden's fuel-tax cut is a <strong>Nordic outlier</strong>. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-editors-need-in-60-seconds">📐 What Editors Need in 60 Second
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (April–May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (April–May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (Apr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter This Month</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong></td><td>Statsminister (M)</td><td>Owns the Spring Fiscal Trilogy narrative; KU32/KU33 grundlag change will be a campaign pillar</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong></td><td>Finansminister (M)</td><td>Defends fuel-tax cut fiscal arithmetic; must respond to Nordic-GDP gap critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td>Utrikesminister (M)</td><td>Tables Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission; will respond to US tribunal-cooperation uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong></td><td>Justitieminister (M)</td><td>Owns migration + criminal-justice blitz; ECHR-litigation exposure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong></td><td>Arbetsmarknads- och integrationsminister (L)</td><td>L identity strain on migration trio; unemployment narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson</strong></td><td>Jämställdhets- och biträdande arbetsmarknadsminister (L)</td><td>Women's-shelter closure interpellation (<code>HD10438</code>); national strategy against violence against women (<code>HD03245</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jakob Forssmed</strong></td><td>Socialminister (KD)</td><td>Hate-speech / mosques interpellation (<code>HD10430</code>); KD internal strain on fuel-tax climate dimension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong></td><td>S partiledare</td><td>Systematic counter-motion architecture — alternative-government manifesto signals</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong></td><td>V partiledare</td><td>Most aggressive blocking strategy; ECHR-litigation architect; 4 %-threshold sensitivity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Märta Stenevi</strong></td><td>MP partiledare</td><td>Climate critique of fuel-tax cut; ECHR-migration coordination with V</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong></td><td>C partiledare</td><td>Swing-position — supports some gov't energy/housing bills, opposes deportation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong></td><td>SD partiledare</td><td>Kingmaker on migration + fuel-tax; JuU15 145–142 signature holder</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU ordförande (M-led)</strong></td><td>KU committee chair</td><td>Carries vilande grundlag vote schedule</td></tr><tr><td><strong>FiU ordförande</strong></td><td>FiU committee chair</td><td>Controls pace of HD03100/HD0399/HD03236 committee reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SfU ordförande</strong></td><td>SfU committee chair</td><td>Schedules hearings on HD03229/HD03235</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority">📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Priority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority">📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Priority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority">📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Prio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Vote</th><th>Committee</th><th>Expected Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td><code>HD03236</code> Extra ändringsbudget (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>FiU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes (bloc vote 145–142 signature); V+MP+S counter-motions rejected</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-20 → 24</strong></td><td><code>HD01UFöU3</code> NATO Finland eFP (1,200 troops)</td><td>UFöU → Kammaren</td><td>Broad majority ≈ 300+ MPs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late April 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU32</code> first-reading vilande (accessibility grundlag)</td><td>KU → Kammaren</td><td>Near-unanimous support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late April 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU33</code> first-reading vilande (digital-evidence)</td><td>KU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes; opposition concerns recorded</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03237</code> Paid police training</td><td>JuU → Kammaren</td><td>Broad majority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early–mid May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03229</code> Reception law + <code>HD03235</code> Deportation rules</td><td>SfU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes on Tidö majority; 145–142 signature likely; ECHR-litigation predicate established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mid–late May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03231</code> + <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal + reparations</td><td>UU → Kammaren</td><td>Cross-party consensus ≈ 349 MPs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> Spring Economic Proposition + Supplementary</td><td>FiU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes; FiU-hearing-driven amendments possible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03240</code> Electricity system laws + <code>HD03239</code> Wind-power revenue sharing</td><td>NU → Kammaren</td><td>Broad support with MP-V climate critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03246</code> Juvenile tightening</td><td>JuU → Kammaren</td><td>Tidö majority likely ≈ 145–142</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-lens-condensed">🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-lens-condensed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-condensed">🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-condensed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-lens-condensed">🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condens
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Specific Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Campaign assets (government)</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy ("ekonomin tryggare") · Migration blitz ("brotten färre, gränsen starkare") · Ukraine tribunal ("Sverige försvarar rätten") · NATO eFP ("säkerheten först")</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign vulnerabilities (government)</strong></td><td>Nordic GDP gap (Sweden 0.82 % vs DK 3.5 %) · Fuel-tax cut vs climate (L + KD strain) · 8.69 % unemployment · Potential ECHR strike-down on migration trio · KU33 press-freedom critique abroad</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition scenarios</strong></td><td>S1 Continuity (P ≈ 0.50) · S2 Opposition success (S-led minority, P ≈ 0.35) · S3 S+V+MP majority (P ≈ 0.15) — full detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy legacy</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax cut = 1-year cyclical · KU32/KU33 = <strong>decadal grundlag change</strong> (only reversible by another grundlag change ⇒ 2 elections) · HD03231 = <strong>10–25 yr tribunal commitment</strong> · HD01UFöU3 = doctrinal NATO precedent · Migration trio = law-book legacy but ECHR-strike-down-sensitive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat > migration > grundlag (unless a chilling-effect case breaks pre-Sep)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-for-the-month">⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-5-risks-for-the-month"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-for-the-month">⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-for-the-month"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R2 — Economic credibility under Riksbank/NIER scrutiny</strong> (L×I = 12): Spring budget expansion while unemployment rises; <code>[VERY HIGH]</code> confidence on macro baseline</li>
 <li><strong>R6 — Reception-law post-enactment ECHR challenge</strong> (L×I = 12): V/C/MP-prepared litigation predicate; Article 3/8 ECHR plausible</li>
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-for-the-month">⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month<a cla
 </ol>
 <p>Full treatment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Risk Matrix + 30/60/90-day trigger calendar.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter (Monthly Forecast)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter (Monthly Forecast)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast">🎯 Analyst Confidence M
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>30-day legislative calendar (P1 vote order)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Committee reports already issued or scheduled</td></tr><tr><td>Vote-outcome projection on Tidö majority bills</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>JuU15 145–142 signature validated 2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 2nd-reading prospects (post-Sep Riksdag)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Entirely conditional on Sep 2026 election outcome</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 macro-data effect on government narrative</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>SCB baseline weak; direction directional</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR migration strike-down timing</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US cooperation on Ukraine tribunal</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Public US statements ambiguous through H1 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid response to NATO eFP</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP deployment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-artefacts-full-package">📎 Related Artefacts (full package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-artefacts-full-package"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-artefacts-full-package">📎 Related Artefacts (full package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-artefacts-full-package"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier-A</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · this Executive Brief
 <strong>Tier-B</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-Reference Map</a>
 <strong>Tier-C</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md">Scenario Analysis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md">Comparative International</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a>
@@ -565,18 +565,18 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-artefacts-full-package">📎 Related Artefacts (full package
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 (weekly) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:30:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (based on 20+ confirmed legislative documents)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The Swedish Riksdag enters a pivotal legislative sprint in late April–May 2026, with the <strong>2026 Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)</strong> and supplementary budgets dominating Finance Committee work, while a multi-bill <strong>Ukraine solidarity cluster</strong> (three interrelated propositions) moves toward plenary votes. A parallel <strong>migration and justice legislative blitz</strong> — encompassing the new reception law, stricter deportation rules, and juvenile justice reform — faces intense opposition from V, MP, C, and S, signalling some of the most contentious votes of the current parliamentary session. With the September 2026 election horizon now dominating political calculations, every vote carries double weight as both governance and campaign positioning.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden's economic backdrop is challenging</strong>: GDP growth of 0.82% in 2024 trails all Nordic peers (Denmark 3.48%, Norway 2.10%, Finland 0.42%), unemployment has climbed to 8.69% in 2025, and the spring budget offers modest relief via fuel tax cuts and energy support targeted at price-sensitive households — but critics argue the measures are pre-election optics rather than structural reform.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026">Key Legislative Milestones (Apr 19 – May 19, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026">Key Legislative Milestones (Apr 19 – May 19, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -703,14 +703,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026">Key Legislative Miles
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Priority</th><th>Document</th><th>Committee</th><th>Status</th><th>Estimated Vote</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🔴CRITICAL</td><td>HD03100 – Spring Economic Proposition 2026</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-13</td><td>Late May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🔴CRITICAL</td><td>HD0399 – Spring Supplementary Budget</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-13</td><td>Late May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🔴CRITICAL</td><td>HD03236 – Extra Budget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Support</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-13</td><td>Late April 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03220 / HD01UFöU3 – NATO Finland Deployment</td><td>UFöU</td><td>Committee report issued</td><td>Imminent vote</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03231 – Ukraine Tribunal Membership</td><td>UU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03232 – Ukraine Compensation Commission</td><td>UU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03229 – New Reception Law (Asylum)</td><td>SfU</td><td>Multiple opposition motions</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03235 – Stricter Deportation Rules</td><td>SfU</td><td>3 opposition motions (V, MP, C)</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03246 – Stricter Rules for Young Offenders</td><td>JuU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03237 – Paid Police Training</td><td>JuU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03240 – New Electricity System Laws</td><td>NU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03239 – Wind Power Revenue Sharing</td><td>NU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03238 – New Environmental Permitting Agency</td><td>MJU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03244 – Public Sector Data Interoperability</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟢LOW</td><td>HD03242 – Active Forestry Framework</td><td>MJU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟢LOW</td><td>HD03245 – National Strategy: Violence Against Women</td><td>AU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>June 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis">Thematic Clusters (Cross-Document Pattern Analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis">Thematic Clusters (Cross-Document Pattern Analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>1. Ukraine Solidarity Cluster</strong> [🟩HIGH confidence]: Three Ukraine-related propositions (HD03231, HD03232, HD03220) represent the largest single-day Ukraine legislative push Sweden has undertaken since the February 2022 invasion. The joint foreign affairs/defense committee (UFöU) has already issued its report on NATO Finland deployment. This cluster will likely pass with broad cross-party support.</p>
 <p><strong>2. Migration &#x26; Justice Blitz</strong> [🟩HIGH confidence]: Five interconnected bills (reception law HD03229, deportation rules HD03235, juvenile justice HD03246, police training HD03237, inhibition order HD01SfU22) form a coordinated pre-election law-and-order narrative. Opposition from S, V, MP, and C on key provisions signals intense committee debates and possible amendment votes.</p>
 <p><strong>3. Spring Budget Package</strong> [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]: The unprecedented triple-submission of HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236 on April 13 represents a carefully orchestrated pre-election economic package. The fuel tax cut and energy support (HD03236) is particularly significant as a direct household relief measure ahead of the election.</p>
 <p><strong>4. Energy Transition Cluster</strong> [🟧MEDIUM confidence]: Three energy bills (electricity system laws HD03240, wind power HD03239, workplace EV charging tax relief HD01SkU23) form an energy policy modernisation package. Cross-party tensions exist on wind power (local government vs. national energy security).</p>
 <p><strong>5. Digital Governance Cluster</strong> [🟧MEDIUM confidence]: State e-ID (HD01TU21) + data interoperability (HD03244) + cybersecurity centre (HD03214-related motion HD024093) form Sweden's digital governance agenda for 2026–2027.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers">Forward Watch Points (Specific Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers">Forward Watch Points (Specific Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>FiU committee report on HD03236 (Fuel Tax Cut)</strong>: Expected within 2 weeks. MP and V motions (HD024092, HD024098) to reject fuel tax cut pending. Vote likely late April / early May 2026. Outcome: Coalition expected to pass, opposition united against. <strong>Trigger</strong>: Committee report publication date.</p>
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers">Forward Watch Points (Specifi
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: September 13, 2026 (expected)
 <strong>Days remaining</strong>: ~147 days</p>
 <p>The legislative agenda April–May 2026 is deeply shaped by election positioning:</p>
@@ -742,12 +742,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" ari
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Coalition stability indicator</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Tidö coalition has sufficient votes on all tracked bills. No defection risk identified through May 2026.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:35:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-scoring-legislative-items">Top-Scoring Legislative Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-scoring-legislative-items"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-scoring-legislative-items">Top-Scoring Legislative Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-scoring-legislative-items"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-scoring-legislative-items">Top-Scoring Legislative Items<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Score (0-100)</th><th>Election Relevance</th><th>Cross-Party Conflict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 Spring Economic Proposition</td><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td><strong>98</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Spring Supplementary Budget</td><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td><strong>96</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra Budget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Support</td><td>Fiscal/Energy/Climate</td><td><strong>95</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03229</td><td>New Reception Law (Asylum)</td><td>Migration</td><td><strong>94</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Stricter Deportation Rules</td><td>Justice/Migration</td><td><strong>93</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03220</td><td>Swedish Contribution to NATO Finland</td><td>Defence/Foreign</td><td><strong>92</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine Tribunal Membership</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td><strong>90</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Compensation Commission</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td><strong>89</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Paid Police Training</td><td>Justice/Security</td><td><strong>85</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Stricter Rules for Young Offenders</td><td>Justice</td><td><strong>83</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD03240</td><td>New Electricity System Laws</td><td>Energy</td><td><strong>82</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind Power Revenue Sharing</td><td>Energy/Climate</td><td><strong>80</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Public Sector Data Interoperability</td><td>Digital/Admin</td><td><strong>78</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD03238</td><td>New Environmental Permitting Agency</td><td>Environment</td><td><strong>77</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Accessibility in Fundamental Law</td><td>Constitutional</td><td><strong>76</strong></td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Digital Files from Search Seizure</td><td>Constitutional/Press</td><td><strong>75</strong></td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD03245</td><td>National Strategy: Violence Against Women</td><td>Social/Gender</td><td><strong>74</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>National Housing Register</td><td>Housing</td><td><strong>72</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition Orders for Deportation</td><td>Migration/Legal</td><td><strong>70</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Waste Legislation Reform</td><td>Environment/EU</td><td><strong>65</strong></td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>Scores are computed as a weighted composite:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Policy impact</strong> (30%): How many citizens/institutions affected and how deeply</li>
@@ -954,23 +954,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>Urgency/timeline</strong> (10%): How soon the vote is expected</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression">Key Insight: Pre-Election Legislative Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression">Key Insight: Pre-Election Legislative Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2025/26 riksmöte is on track to be the most legislatively active session of the Tidö coalition's term. The concentration of high-significance bills in April–May 2026 (all 20 top-scoring items submitted between April 9–17, 2026) indicates deliberate legislative acceleration before the summer recess and September election. This is consistent with international patterns of incumbent governments front-loading their policy agenda in the final parliamentary session before an election.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:36:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-citizens--households">1. Citizens &#x26; Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--households"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--households">1. Citizens &#x26; Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--households"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary concern</strong>: Economic anxiety — unemployment at 8.69%, weak GDP growth (0.82% in 2024)
 <strong>Immediate benefit</strong>: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) reduces petrol/diesel costs directly; parental allowance simplification (HD01SfU20) reduces administrative burden
 <strong>Concern</strong>: Women's shelter closures (HD10438) reduce safety net; declining Stockholm housing construction (HD10434)
 <strong>Awareness level</strong>: HIGH for fuel tax cut (widely reported); LOW for most regulatory bills
 <strong>Likely response</strong>: Cautious welcome for price relief; continued concern over employment prospects</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>M (Moderaterna) — Ulf Kristersson</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Championing Ukraine solidarity cluster as foreign policy legacy</li>
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a
 <li>NATO/Ukraine cluster strongly supported</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc">3. Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc">3. Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna) — Magdalena Andersson</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Filed motions on reception law (HD024080), supplementary budget (HD024082), settlement law (HD024079)</li>
@@ -1027,31 +1027,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc">3. Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 <li>LGBTQ rights interpellation (HD10431) filed by C member</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Energy sector</strong>: Strongly welcomes new electricity system laws (HD03240) and permanent EV charging tax relief (HD01SkU23). Wind energy companies benefit from revenue-sharing law (HD03239) enabling faster municipal permit approval.</p>
 <p><strong>Financial/Banking sector</strong>: Consumer credit law (HD03223) and new harbour law (HD03234) create compliance obligations but also legal clarity.</p>
 <p><strong>Tech sector</strong>: Data interoperability requirements (HD03244) create new market for public sector integration services; state e-ID reduces authentication friction.</p>
 <p><strong>Forestry/Agriculture</strong>: New active forestry framework (HD03242) — industry cautiously positive but watching implementation details.</p>
 <p><strong>Shipping</strong>: New harbour law (HD03234) modernises regulatory framework.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Women's rights organisations</strong>: Deep concern about women's shelter closures (HD10438); cautiously positive on violence against women strategy (HD03245) but awaiting funding commitments.</p>
 <p><strong>Asylum/refugee support</strong>: Strongly opposing new reception law (HD03229) and deportation rules (HD03235); calling for parliamentary hearings with affected communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Environmental NGOs</strong>: Welcome waste legislation reform (HD01MJU19) and EU circular economy compliance; strongly oppose fuel tax cut (HD03236); cautious on new environmental permitting agency (HD03238) — fear reduced procedural protection.</p>
 <p><strong>LGBTQ organisations</strong>: HD10431 interpellation (C party) on LGBTQ rights internationally signals awareness; domestic legal framework stable.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>EU Commission</strong>: Monitoring Sweden's implementation of EU accessibility directive (basis for HD01KU32); will receive notification on fuel tax subsidy (state aid assessment).</p>
 <p><strong>NATO allies</strong>: Strongly supportive of NATO Finland deployment (HD03220); Ukraine tribunal and compensation commission (HD03231, HD03232) reinforce rule-of-law credentials.</p>
 <p><strong>Ukraine</strong>: Three solidarity bills represent significant political and legal support; compensation commission membership has direct material implications for Ukrainian reparations claims.</p>
 <p><strong>Nordic neighbours</strong>: Denmark, Norway, Finland all benefiting from stronger Swedish security posture; Finland directly affected by HD03220.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts">7. Judiciary/Constitutional Experts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts">7. Judiciary/Constitutional Experts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional law community</strong>: Two "vilande" fundamental law changes (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) following correct procedure; concerns about HD01KU33 implications for press freedom and right to inspect public documents.</p>
 <p><strong>Administrative courts</strong>: New inhibition order system (HD01SfU22, entering force 2026-06-01) will create new case categories requiring judicial interpretation.</p>
 <p><strong>ECHR/Human rights lawyers</strong>: Deportation rules (HD03235) and new reception law (HD03229) will face scrutiny under Article 3 (prohibition of torture/inhuman treatment) and Article 8 (family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Major focus topics</strong> (predicted high coverage in April–May 2026):</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Spring budget and fuel tax cut (HD03236) — economic story of the month</li>
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Media sentiment</strong>: Split along existing political lines. State broadcaster SVT expected to give balanced coverage of budget debate; tabloids (Expressen, Aftonbladet) likely to focus on migration and crime legislation for high reader engagement.</p>
 <p><strong>Social media dynamics</strong>: Fuel tax cut and deportation rules expected to trend heavily. Ukraine solidarity likely positive sentiment across partisan lines.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SCN-ID</strong></td><td>SCN-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>30-day base (2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19) · 90-day extension (→ 2026-07-19) · post-Sep-election horizon (2026-Q4)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian priors + ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) + Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 continuity)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scenarios</strong></td><td>3 base + 2 wildcards + 1 black-swan</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands (30-day + post-election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands (30-day + post-election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1189,10 +1189,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election">🎯
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Event</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>B1</strong></td><td>US withdraws or delays cooperation on Ukraine Special Tribunal (<code>HD03231</code>)</td><td>Reduces tribunal effectiveness; Sweden's norm-entrepreneurship claim softened; foreign-policy narrative loses one pillar</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>B2</strong></td><td>Major fuel-tax-cut EU state-aid challenge lands pre-Sep</td><td>Forces government to defend subsidy architecture at campaign peak</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (30-day P = 0.85 · post-Sep P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (30-day P = 0.85 · post-Sep P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidö working majority (M+KD+L + SD support) passes all five legislative clusters. The JuU15 145–142 signature holds on every cross-bloc vote. Spring fiscal trilogy executes; KU32 + KU33 first readings pass (vilande); Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission architecture passes with ≈ 349 MPs; NATO eFP deploys 1,200 troops to Finland by 2026-Q3. Post-Sep-2026 re-election confirms the coalition, and KU32/KU33 second readings ratify. Migration blitz enters the statute book.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon">Necessary Conditions (30-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon">Necessary Conditions (30-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon">Necessary Conditions (30-day hor
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>FiU committee delivers HD03236 report on schedule</td><td>FiU committee calendar, 2026-04-21/22</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (~0.95)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>UFöU report on HD01UFöU3 produces majority chamber support</td><td>Already issued; plenary scheduling</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (~0.98)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SfU holds hearings on HD03229/HD03235 without blocking-coalition emergence</td><td>SfU committee schedule</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.88)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>UU delivers report on HD03231/HD03232 by mid-May</td><td>UU committee calendar</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.90)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>No major coalition internal fracture (L defection on migration, KD defection on fuel-tax)</td><td>Media tracking · interpellation log</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.82)</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Russian hybrid response contained (no major escalation event)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins · Nordic event log</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.75)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day">Indicators to Monitor (30-day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day">Indicators to Monitor (30-day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2026-04-21</strong> FiU committee report on HD03236 (trigger: publication)</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-22</strong> Kammarvote on HD03236 (trigger: chamber protocol)</li>
@@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day">Indicators to Monitor (30-day)<a class=
 <li><strong>2026-05-28</strong> SCB labour-force survey release (trigger: data release)</li>
 <li><strong>2026-06-03</strong> KI Konjunkturinstitutet baseline update (trigger: publication)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-policy--narrative">Implications (policy + narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-policy--narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-policy--narrative">Implications (policy + narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-policy--narrative"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Fiscal trilogy delivers; government gains pre-election narrative of delivery</li>
 <li>✅ Ukraine tribunal architecture operationalises; norm-entrepreneurship campaign asset</li>
@@ -1263,10 +1263,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-policy--narrative">Implications (policy + narrative)<a c
 <li>⚠️ Q1 2026 macro data (SCB 2026-05-28) decisive for economic-stewardship narrative</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (post-Sep P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (post-Sep P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h4>
 <p>September 2026 produces an S-led minority government, with V/MP/C occasional cooperation. KU33 second reading <strong>fails</strong> or is rewritten. Vårpropositionens fiscal arithmetic re-opened in the 2026/27 Riksmöte. Migration trio retained but substantively reformed (SfU22 inhibition tightened; reception-law procedural protections restored). Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained intact (cross-party consensus).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1309,9 +1309,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>S polling above M+KD+L combined by late Aug 2026</td><td>SCB/Sifo/Novus/Ipsos trackers</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Cost-of-living remains top-salience issue (not migration or Ukraine)</td><td>Sifo/Novus salience trackers</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.70)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>At least one major coalition fracture event (L identity crisis on migration; KD climate defection)</td><td>Media tracking · interpellation log</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.45)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>No Russian hybrid escalation shifting voter focus to security</td><td>SÄPO bulletins</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.65)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>MP + V clear the 4 % threshold (so S+V+MP coalition feasible)</td><td>Sifo monthly</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal">30-day manifestation (minimal)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal">30-day manifestation (minimal)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal"></a></h4>
 <p>In the 30-day window, S2 is pre-manifesting via <strong>counter-motion architecture</strong> rather than vote outcomes. Every government bill in April–May is paired with a systematic S/V/MP/C counter-motion (19 counter-motions tracked in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §Counter-Motion Network). These serve as <strong>alternative-government manifesto documents</strong> for the September campaign. The 30-day indicator is: <strong>Is opposition counter-motion content reported by legacy media as an "alternative government program" or dismissed as procedural?</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ V/C/MP ECHR-litigation-predicate fully matured; Strasbourg docket H2 2026</li>
 <li>✅ Policy legacy preserved where cross-party consensus existed (Ukraine, NATO, KU32 accessibility)</li>
@@ -1320,10 +1320,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>⚠️ Migration-trio reform tested against SD-base backlash for successor government</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority (post-Sep P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority (post-Sep P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h4>
 <p>September 2026 produces an S+V+MP majority. KU33 2nd reading <strong>blocked</strong>. Fiscal arithmetic <strong>fully renegotiated</strong> (progressive-tax reforms plausible). Migration trio substantially <strong>revised or repealed</strong> (reception law reopened; inhibition orders repealed). NATO + Ukraine retained as cross-party. Climate reform accelerates (fuel-tax cut reversed).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1360,26 +1360,26 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>S + V + MP combined > 175 seats in Sep 2026</td><td>Sifo final trackers</td><td align="center">🟥 L (~0.20)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>V above 6 % threshold (rising base); MP above 5 %</td><td>Monthly trackers</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.45)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Coalition rhetorical collapse pre-Sep (L pulls out or KD rhetorical break)</td><td>Media events</td><td align="center">🟥 L (~0.25)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Economic narrative remains decisive (no Russian hybrid or other security event)</td><td>Continuous</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.60)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-manifestation">30-day manifestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-manifestation">30-day manifestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation"></a></h4>
 <p>Minimal direct effect in 30 days. Indirect: <strong>V-block fuel-tax motion (HD024092) and MP-block (HD024098) establish the 2026 campaign's climate-reversal narrative</strong>. If these counter-motions are accepted for committee referral (even if defeated), the narrative architecture is set.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Climate reform accelerates; KU33 reversal; full migration-trio redesign</li>
 <li>⚠️ Unprecedented rapid policy reversals create regulatory uncertainty</li>
 <li>⚠️ Credibility cost with EU + NATO allies on fiscal discipline</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising">📊 Wildcard W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation (P = 0.22, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-3">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising">📊 Wildcard W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation (P = 0.22, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-3">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-3"></a></h4>
 <p>A Russian hybrid-warfare event (cyber-attack on Swedish critical infrastructure, airspace incursion, undersea-cable sabotage, election-interference campaign, or kinetic escalation in Baltic region) shifts campaign agenda from cost-of-living to security.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-indicators">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-indicators">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SÄPO elevation of threat level (continuous monitoring)</li>
 <li>Nordic event log (Baltic/Finnish incidents)</li>
 <li>Undersea-cable incident reports (Baltic)</li>
 <li>Cybersäkerhetscentrum alert bulletins</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1404,16 +1404,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Base scenario</th><th align="center">Adjusted P if W1 realised</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 Continuity</td><td align="center"><strong>+7 pp → ~0.57 (post-Sep)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>S2 Opposition success</td><td align="center">−4 pp → ~0.31</td></tr><tr><td>S3 S+V+MP majority</td><td align="center"><strong>−3 pp → ~0.12</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Narrative shift</strong>: NATO eFP and Ukraine tribunal become campaign centrepieces; migration + fiscal fall in salience; SD-government hardens; coalition-internal strain reduced.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012">📊 Wildcard W2 — ECHR Strike-Down on Inhibition Orders Pre-Sep (P = 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-4">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-4"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012">📊 Wildcard W2 — ECHR Strike-Down on Inhibition Orders Pre-Sep (P = 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-4">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-4"></a></h4>
 <p>A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders (<code>HD01SfU22</code>) before Sep 2026, finding Article 3 or Article 8 ECHR violation. Government forced to amend mid-campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-indicators-1">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-indicators-1">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Strasbourg docket monitoring (V parlamentariska kansli)</li>
 <li>Interim-measures request filings (plausible early 2026-Q3)</li>
 <li>ECHR press-release calendar</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Base scenario</th><th align="center">Adjusted P if W2 realised</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 Continuity</td><td align="center"><strong>−8 pp → ~0.42 (post-Sep)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>S2 Opposition success</td><td align="center"><strong>+7 pp → ~0.42</strong></td></tr><tr><td>S3 S+V+MP majority</td><td align="center">+1 pp → ~0.16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Narrative shift</strong>: Government legal-credibility cost; "rule of law" narrative weaponised against migration blitz; fuel-tax-cut pairing amplified as "law-of-convenience" critique.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only">🔬 ACH Grid — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (30-day resolution only)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only">🔬 ACH Grid — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (30-day resolution only)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1501,7 +1501,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Supports S1</th><th align="center">Supports S2/S3</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU committee calendar on track</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>Strong S1 signal</td></tr><tr><td>JuU15 145–142 signature validated 2026-04-16</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>Pure bloc discipline → S1</td></tr><tr><td>19 coordinated opposition counter-motions filed</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Opposition architecture maturing → S2/S3 base-rate</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish 2024 GDP 0.82 % (lowest Nordic)</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Economic-vulnerability argument → S2</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition internal silence on fuel-tax climate tension (no L defection yet)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>S1 holding</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal cross-party consensus ≈ 349 MPs</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Neutral (consensus cuts across bloc)</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid baseline (no escalation event in 30-day horizon)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>S1 path preserved</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR docket pace slow for inhibition orders</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>W2 held in abeyance → S1 path</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>ACH conclusion</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: In the 30-day horizon, S1 continuity is dominant (P ≈ 0.85). S2/S3 crystallise via post-Sep dynamics, not April–May votes. The 30-day window's strategic function is <strong>manifesto architecture</strong> (S2/S3 counter-motions) rather than vote outcomes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping">📅 90-Day Monitoring Calendar (trigger → scenario-shift mapping)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping">📅 90-Day Monitoring Calendar (trigger → scenario-shift mapping)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping">📅 90-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Scenario-Shift Potential</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>HD03236 chamber vote</td><td>Confirms S1 if passes on 145–142 bloc signature</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-24</td><td>HD01UFöU3 chamber vote</td><td>Confirms S1; strengthens narrative on NATO integration</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-30</td><td>KU first-reading KU32/KU33</td><td>Embeds 2nd-reading decision in Sep 2026 result</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-15</td><td>SfU report on HD03229/HD03235</td><td>Opposition's counter-motion architecture published</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-20</td><td>Chamber votes on migration blitz</td><td>145–142 signature tested; shift to S1 if holds</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-05-28</strong></td><td><strong>SCB Q1 labour-force survey</strong></td><td><strong>Most decisive pre-summer macro datapoint</strong> — directional for S1 vs S2</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-03</td><td>KI baseline economic update</td><td>Confirms/disconfirms macro trajectory</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Summer-recess begins</td><td>Last pre-campaign chamber activity</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-01</td><td>KI medium-term prognosis</td><td>Election-season baseline established</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-13</td><td>Opinion-poll campaign window opens</td><td>Crystallisation of S1/S2/S3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-13</strong></td><td><strong>General election</strong></td><td>Definitive resolution</td></tr><tr><td>2026-10-01</td><td>Post-election Riksdag convenes</td><td>KU33 2nd-reading prospects determined</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>30-day P bands (S1 dominant)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Derived from upstream weekly-review + committee schedules</td></tr><tr><td>Post-Sep P bands</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Conditional on macro Q3 data + opposition-manifesto reception</td></tr><tr><td>W1 rising baseline (Russian hybrid)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>Post-eFP deployment increases incentive</td></tr><tr><td>W2 ECHR docket pace</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Strasbourg timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>ACH 30-day resolution</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Evidence asymmetry clear</td></tr><tr><td>Counter-motion → manifesto translation success</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Media framing contingent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">📎 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">📎 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — canonical 90-day + post-election scenario baseline (adopted here, extended to 30-day band)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/week-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>2026-04-17/week-ahead/synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — week-16 forward indicators (now operationalised as 30-day triggers)</li>
@@ -1626,12 +1626,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">📎 Cross-Reference to U
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 (weekly) or on any W1/W2 trigger · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian priors + ACH.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:33:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep (≥4 risks with numeric L×I scores required)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact">Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact">Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1720,21 +1720,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact">Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Category</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>SfU committee blocks or significantly amends deportation rules (HD03235) under opposition pressure</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Legislative/Political</td><td>V+MP+C forming blocking coalition in committee</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>Spring budget (HD03100) triggers Riksbank credibility debate — high unemployment + deficit spending</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Economic/Fiscal</td><td>Riksbank or NIER economic assessment</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>NATO Finland deployment vote (HD01UFöU3) delayed by procedural challenge</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>Security/International</td><td>Opposition procedural motion</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Fuel tax cut (HD03236) generates EU state aid scrutiny</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>EU/Legal</td><td>European Commission notification</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>Coalition tension on climate — energy support contradicts green commitments</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Coalition/Reputational</td><td>L or KD public dissent on fuel subsidy</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>New reception law (HD03229) faces constitutional court challenge post-enactment</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Legal/Constitutional</td><td>Legal challenge filed by NGO or municipality</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Unemployment climbs further above 8.69% — undermines government's economic narrative</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Economic</td><td>SCB/Statistics Sweden monthly labour data</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Women's shelter closure crisis escalates — interpellation becomes media crisis</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Reputational/Social</td><td>More shelter closures reported in May 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-risk-analysis">Detailed Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high">R2/R6/R7: Economic Risk Cluster (Combined L×I: High)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-risk-analysis">Detailed Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high">R2/R6/R7: Economic Risk Cluster (Combined L×I: High)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth of 0.82% in 2024 — lagging Denmark (3.48%), Norway (2.10%), Finland (0.42%) — combined with rising unemployment to 8.69% in 2025 creates a fragile economic backdrop for the spring budget season. The government's fiscal stimulus via fuel tax cuts and energy support is expansionary at a time when fiscal consolidation may be more prudent. The Riksbank's assessment of the spring economic proposition will be the key inflection point.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Konjunkturinstitutet economic tendency survey (May) — if confidence falls, amplifies economic risk score.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Government's explicit fiscal framework review (HD03241 — Riksrevisionen report on financial policy framework) provides parliamentary oversight mechanism.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension">R5: Climate Coalition Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension">R5: Climate Coalition Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension"></a></h4>
 <p>The fuel tax cut (HD03236) explicitly lowers taxes on petrol and diesel — a direct contradiction of L (Liberals) and KD's stated climate positions. Interpellation responses and Alliansen party statements in May will reveal the degree of internal tension. SD's voter base strongly supports lower fuel taxes; this is fundamentally a SD electoral concession within the coalition.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: L party conference statements in May; environmental organisations' response.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Simultaneous passage of EV charging tax relief (HD01SkU23) and wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) provides rhetorical balance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r8-social-services-deterioration">R8: Social Services Deterioration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8-social-services-deterioration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r8-social-services-deterioration">R8: Social Services Deterioration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8-social-services-deterioration"></a></h4>
 <p>Women's shelter closures (interpellation HD10438 by Sofia Amloh/S to Minister Nina Larsson/L) signal a systemic underfunding of violence prevention infrastructure. If additional closures are reported during May, this could escalate into a multi-day media event with cross-party condemnation.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Riksorganisationen för kvinnojourer och tjejjourer i Sverige (ROKS) membership survey results.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: National strategy against violence against women (HD03245 skrivelse) provides a policy response framework but no immediate funding commitment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap-summary">Risk Heatmap Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heatmap-summary">Risk Heatmap Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>Impact ↑
   5 |  R3
   4 |      R1  R2  R6  R7
@@ -1747,15 +1747,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap-summary">Risk Heatmap Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Highest priority</strong>: R2 (economic credibility), R6 (reception law legal risk), R7 (unemployment trajectory)
 <strong>Most urgent</strong>: R1 (deportation rules — vote imminent), R3 (NATO Finland — imminent vote)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Overall risk confidence: 🟩HIGH — All risks grounded in specific legislative documents and observable economic data. Economic indicators are from World Bank (2024–2025 data). Legislative timeline risks based on committee report dates and known parliamentary procedure.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:32:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep (8 stakeholder groups required)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Government delivers historic Ukraine solidarity package — 3 interlinked propositions on tribunal, compensation commission, and NATO Finland deployment submitted in single week</td><td>HD03231, HD03232, HD03220</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Spring Economic Proposition + 2 supplementary budgets submitted simultaneously, showing coordinated fiscal planning</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Fuel tax cut and energy support demonstrate direct household relief capacity before election</td><td>HD03236</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Paid police training (HD03237) addresses chronic recruitment problem with structural solution</td><td>HD03237</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Constitutional law committee (KU) advancing two fundamental law modernisations simultaneously</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S6</td><td>Wind power revenue-sharing law (HD03239) creates new financial incentive model for municipal acceptance</td><td>HD03239</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>S7</td><td>National housing register (HD01CU28) improves property market transparency and crime prevention</td><td>HD01CU28, HD01CU27</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>Sweden GDP growth 2024 only 0.82%, significantly lagging Denmark (3.48%) and Norway (2.10%)</td><td>World Bank data</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Unemployment risen to 8.69% in 2025, highest among Nordic peers, eroding government's economic credibility</td><td>World Bank data</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>Fuel tax cut (HD03236) contradicts climate commitments — MP motion HD024098, V motion HD024092 cite contradiction with net-zero targets</td><td>HD024098, HD024092</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Multiple coalition bills face strong opposition motions, indicating contested electoral legitimacy</td><td>HD024079-HD024097 (19 counter-motions)</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>Women's shelter closures (interpellation HD10438) expose gap between government rhetoric and social services funding</td><td>HD10438</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W6</td><td>Housing construction declining in Stockholm region — 11,091 units planned for 2026 vs. higher demand</td><td>HD10434</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>W7</td><td>New environmental permitting agency (HD03238) adds institutional complexity in the short term</td><td>HD03238</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Spring budget package creates pre-election economic narrative — government can campaign on delivered fiscal relief</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Ukraine legislative cluster enhances Sweden's international standing as a NATO ally and rule-of-law advocate</td><td>HD03231, HD03232, HD03220</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>New electricity system laws (HD03240) provide regulatory certainty for energy investment</td><td>HD03240</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Data interoperability requirements (HD03244) position Sweden as digital governance leader in EU context</td><td>HD03244</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>O5</td><td>State e-ID (HD01TU21) reduces fraud and enables digital public services</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>O6</td><td>Waste legislation reform (HD01MJU19) improves circular economy compliance with EU targets</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2019,75 +2019,75 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Opposition unity on migration/reception law (V+MP+C+S all filing counter-motions) risks making HD03229 the most contested vote of the session</td><td>HD024079-HD024089</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>Deportation rules (HD03235) face constitutional challenge risk — C motion (HD024095) seeks significant amendment</td><td>HD024090, HD024095, HD024097</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Tax system review pressure (interpellation HD10433) signals post-election risk of fundamental fiscal restructuring</td><td>HD10433</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>EU wage transparency directive (interpellation HD10437) creates compliance obligation that may require further legislation</td><td>HD10437</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td>Defence infrastructure cost burden (interpellation HD10425) signals fiscal stress from NATO expansion obligations</td><td>HD10425</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-03-31</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups">Stakeholder Analysis (8 Mandatory Groups)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-high-confidence">1. Citizens [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups">Stakeholder Analysis (8 Mandatory Groups)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-high-confidence">1. Citizens [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) provides immediate household relief — petrol and diesel prices affected directly; parental allowance reform (HD01SfU20) removes bureaucratic burden for parents; housing register (HD01CU28) improves property transparency.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Unemployment at 8.69% creates economic anxiety; declining housing construction in Stockholm limits affordability; women's shelter closures (HD10438) reduce safety net for vulnerable women.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Mixed — pre-election economic measures provide visible short-term relief while structural employment and housing problems persist.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L) [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L) [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Massive legislative delivery package demonstrates governing capacity; Ukraine cluster strengthens international credentials; law-and-order narrative via migration/justice bills consolidates core SD voter base.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Fuel tax cut creates climate credibility gap; unemployment rise undercuts economic management narrative; inter-coalition tensions between KD social policy and SD migration positions possible.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Strong position entering campaign season but vulnerable on economic competence.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP+C) [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP+C) [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: 19 counter-motions filed create clear policy differentiation for election campaigns; S can position as responsible alternative government; C occupies swing position on multiple bills.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Opposition lacks votes to block any coalition bill; risk of being seen as obstructionist rather than constructive; V and MP face marginal parliamentary existence risk.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Counter-motions are primarily electoral positioning documents — they will not change outcomes but build manifesto differentiation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence">4. Business &#x26; Industry [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence">4. Business &#x26; Industry [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: New electricity system laws (HD03240) provide investment certainty; state e-ID reduces administrative burden; data interoperability (HD03244) reduces public sector data friction; paid police training (HD03237) increases security.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Forestry industry concerns about new regulations (HD03242); shipping industry affected by harbour law (HD03234); construction sector faces ongoing housing demand/supply mismatch.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Net positive from regulatory modernisation and energy security framework.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence">5. Civil Society [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence">5. Civil Society [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: National strategy against violence against women (HD03245) represents significant policy commitment; accessibility improvements in fundamental law (HD01KU32) benefit persons with disabilities.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Women's shelter closures (HD10438) signal funding gaps in violence prevention infrastructure; civil society asylum support organisations affected by new reception law (HD03229).
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Concerned — policy commitments not matched by service funding.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence">6. International/EU [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence">6. International/EU [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Three Ukraine solidarity bills significantly strengthen Sweden's international standing post-NATO accession; EU accessibility requirements compliance improved (HD01KU32); EU waste legislation compliance improved (HD01MJU19).
 <strong>Risks</strong>: EU wage transparency directive (HD10437) creates compliance pressure; weapons export rules debate (HD024091, HD024096) could affect EU/NATO arms coordination.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Sweden's international posture strengthened substantially by Ukraine legislative cluster.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence">7. Judiciary/Constitutional [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence">7. Judiciary/Constitutional [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Two fundamental law changes being adopted as "vilande" (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) — proper constitutional procedure followed; identity requirements for property registration (HD01CU27) strengthen anti-money-laundering framework.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Deportation rules (HD03235) face legal scrutiny on proportionality; inhibition order law (HD01SfU22) tested against ECHR standards; freedom of speech protections under scrutiny (HD10429).
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Constitutional procedure is sound; specific bills face potential future legal challenge.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence">8. Media/Public Opinion [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence">8. Media/Public Opinion [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Fuel tax cut generates positive headline coverage; Ukraine solidarity cluster creates positive international media narrative; police training reform is popular.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Unemployment at 8.69% is the overriding economic story; women's shelter closures generate negative human interest coverage; migration debate is polarising.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Media environment is contested — government has positive stories but negative economic indicators dominate.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:34:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level-medium">Overall Threat Level: MEDIUM<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-medium"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-level-medium">Overall Threat Level: MEDIUM<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-medium"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliamentary system is functioning within normal democratic parameters. The threat landscape is dominated by <strong>political polarisation</strong> around migration policy and <strong>economic vulnerabilities</strong> ahead of the September 2026 election, rather than acute institutional threats.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-identification">Threat Identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-identification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy">T1: Democratic Legitimacy Strain on Migration Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-identification">Threat Identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-identification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy">T1: Democratic Legitimacy Strain on Migration Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟠MEDIUM-HIGH
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p>The simultaneous introduction of the new reception law (HD03229), stricter deportation rules (HD03235), and inhibition orders (HD01SfU22) creates a trifecta of migration tightening that has generated the most intensive parliamentary opposition of the 2025/26 session. With 19 counter-motions filed by S, V, MP, and C parties, and civil society organisations raising human rights concerns, the risk is that democratic legitimacy of these laws is contested post-enactment.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024079 (S), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C), HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP) — 7 motions against HD03229 and HD03235 alone.
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Administrative court challenges to individual deportation decisions under new rules.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk">T2: Constitutional Creep Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk">T2: Constitutional Creep Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟡MEDIUM
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p>Two bills are being simultaneously adopted as "vilande" fundamental law changes (HD01KU32 accessibility in media, HD01KU33 documents obtained by search and seizure). While the procedure is constitutionally sound, the substance of HD01KU33 — removing seized digital files from public records — raises press freedom concerns noted in KU's own reasoning. The Swedish Press Freedom Foundation and journalist organisations are expected to scrutinise this closely.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01KU33 explicitly exempts seized digital files from being classified as public documents.
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Statement by Swedish Press Photographers' Association or Reporters Without Borders.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap">T3: Cybersecurity Legislative Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap">T3: Cybersecurity Legislative Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟡MEDIUM
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p>The C party motion (HD024093) questioning the cybersecurity centre bill (HD03214-related) calls for further analysis before enactment. Sweden's cybersecurity posture is critical given NATO membership and the Ukraine conflict. Legislative delay in strengthening the National Cybersecurity Centre creates a potential capability gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024093 — Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) and Mikael Larsson (C) motion for further analysis.
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: NCSC operational assessment report.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth">T4: Economic Security Threat from Low Growth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth">T4: Economic Security Threat from Low Growth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟠MEDIUM-HIGH
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟦VERY HIGH</p>
 <p>Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth in 2024, rising unemployment (8.69% in 2025), and inflation now at 2.84% (down from 8.55% in 2023) represent an economic security threat. The government's spring budget offers modest stimulus, but structural reforms needed for sustained growth are not visible in the current legislative pipeline. This economic fragility increases Sweden's vulnerability to external shocks (trade war, energy price spikes, global recession).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: World Bank data; HD03100 (Spring Economic Proposition), HD0399 (Supplementary Budget).
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: May unemployment statistics from SCB.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-severity-ranking">Severity Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-severity-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-severity-ranking">Severity Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-severity-ranking"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>T1: Migration legitimacy strain — <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> (🟧)</li>
 <li>T4: Economic security — <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> (🟧)</li>
@@ -2095,10 +2095,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-severity-ranking">Severity Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>T3: Cybersecurity gap — <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (🟡)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigation-landscape">Mitigation Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigation-landscape">Mitigation Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-landscape"></a></h3>
 <p>The Riksdag's constitutional committee processes are functioning; government has parliamentary majority to pass contested legislation; economic policy framework review (HD03241) provides transparency. Threat level is unlikely to escalate to HIGH in the 30-day window absent major external shock.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2134,13 +2134,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>30-day forward (2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19) with 90-day fiscal/migration/constitutional trajectory extension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (Comparative Benchmarking) + Nordic + EU baseline references</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jurisdictions Benchmarked</strong></td><td>8 — Sweden · Denmark · Norway · Finland · Germany · Netherlands · United Kingdom · Estonia (+ Ireland for migration cluster)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Sources</strong></td><td>World Bank (<code>economic-data.json</code>); RSF Press Freedom Index 2025; OECD; Eurostat; national parliament sources; UN/ICC (Ukraine tribunal context)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>A reference-grade month-ahead outlook must <strong>benchmark against ≥ 5 jurisdictions</strong> so that Swedish legislative developments are interpreted in context, not in isolation. Every cluster in the 30-day window (fiscal, migration, constitutional, Ukraine accountability, energy) is also a live political battleground in neighbouring jurisdictions — and the comparative lens is the most reliable way to identify where Sweden <em>innovates</em>, where it <em>follows</em>, and where it <em>diverges</em>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2024</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2023</th><th align="center">Unemployment 2025</th><th align="center">Inflation 2024</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.82 %</strong></td><td align="center">−0.20 %</td><td align="center"><strong>8.69 %</strong></td><td align="center">2.84 %</td><td>Nordic-lowest GDP; unemployment at 5-year high</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">3.48 %</td><td align="center">2.50 %</td><td align="center">~5.6 %</td><td align="center">~1.3 %</td><td>Nordic-highest — pharma (Novo Nordisk) + green-tech effect</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">2.10 %</td><td align="center">0.50 %</td><td align="center">~3.8 %</td><td align="center">~3.1 %</td><td>Sovereign-wealth buffer; carbon-fee retained</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">0.42 %</td><td align="center">−0.96 %</td><td align="center">~8.4 %</td><td align="center">~1.4 %</td><td>Sweden-comparable trajectory; EU-sensitive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong> (EU benchmark)</td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">~3.0 %</td><td align="center">~2.2 %</td><td>EU-sluggish; Mittelstand headwinds</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">~0.9 %</td><td align="center">~0.1 %</td><td align="center">~3.7 %</td><td align="center">~3.3 %</td><td>Comparable, tight labour market</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">~0.9 %</td><td align="center">0.1 %</td><td align="center">~4.4 %</td><td align="center">~2.5 %</td><td>Comparable to Sweden on GDP; unemployment lower</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estonia</strong></td><td align="center">~0.6 %</td><td align="center">−3.0 %</td><td align="center">~7.5 %</td><td align="center">~2.1 %</td><td>Post-shock recovery; Baltic outlier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden's 0.82 % growth in 2024 — vs Denmark's 3.48 % — is the <strong>single largest empirical vulnerability</strong> in the Tidö government's economic-stewardship narrative. Finland tracks similarly poorly. The Spring Fiscal Trilogy (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236) is a <strong>stimulus response to a structural underperformance gap</strong>, not a normal cyclical fiscal calibration.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026">Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026">Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2276,7 +2276,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026">Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 Fiscal Stance</th><th align="center">Carbon-pricing discipline?</th><th align="center">Comparable instrument to HD03236 fuel-tax cut?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Mild-moderate stimulus (vårproposition + extra ändringsbudget; fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief + försvarsanslag)</td><td align="center"><strong>Partially reversed (fuel tax)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Reference (HD03236)</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Restrictive (surplus discipline; carbon fee retained; defence ↑)</td><td align="center"><strong>Full retention</strong></td><td align="center">❌ No fuel-tax cut; uses targeted income support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Moderate (oil-fund withdrawal at structural rate; carbon-fee <strong>adjusted downward but retained</strong>)</td><td align="center"><strong>Partial — carbon fee reduced in 2026 budget</strong></td><td align="center">❌ Carbon-fee adjustment, not tax cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Cautious-restrictive (debt-brake compatible)</td><td align="center">Retained</td><td align="center">❌ No fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Cautious; Schuldenbremse constraint</td><td align="center">Retained (ETS + Brennstoffemissionshandelsgesetz)</td><td align="center">❌ No cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Mild-cautious</td><td align="center">Retained</td><td align="center">❌ No cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Mild-restrictive (OBR fiscal rules)</td><td align="center">Retained post-Brexit (carbon pricing floor)</td><td align="center">❌ No cut</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Among Nordic peers, Denmark and Finland retain <strong>full carbon-pricing discipline</strong> while supporting cost-of-living relief through other instruments (targeted income support, energy-poverty subsidies). Norway has partially adjusted carbon fees — closer to Sweden but not cutting fuel tax directly. <strong>Sweden's 82-öre fuel-tax cut is a Nordic outlier</strong> and will be scrutinised against these peer approaches in the September 2026 campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-budget-process-comparison">Budget-Process Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-process-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget-process-comparison">Budget-Process Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-process-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2315,8 +2315,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-budget-process-comparison">Budget-Process Comparison<a class="" aria-
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Pre-election budget sprint?</th><th>2026 session volume</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Aggressive (3 fiscal instruments simultaneously in 1 week)</td><td>Maximalist</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">— (no 2026 election)</td><td>Routine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Moderate (storting election Sep 2025 already occurred)</td><td>Moderate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">— (no 2026 election)</td><td>Routine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Routine</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: The triple-submission HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236 on 2026-04-13 has no Nordic precedent in a pre-election term. It represents the <strong>most compressed fiscal-package submission</strong> in the Tidö term.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33) in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025">Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33) in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025">Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2408,8 +2408,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025">Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)<a class=
 <p><strong>Key insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>Nordic normalisation argument is genuine</strong> — KU33 brings Sweden closer to Nordic peer defaults rather than deviating from them. However, <strong>the interpretive-frontier risk is real</strong>: the phrase <em>"formellt tillförd bevisning"</em> is the strategic centre of gravity. Nordic peers rely on administrative-decision chains to narrow access; HD01KU33 relies on a constitutional formulation that Lagrådet must interpret (Q2 2026 trigger).</p>
 <p><strong>HD01KU32 contextualisation</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Embedding accessibility rights in grundlag is <strong>ahead of Nordic peers</strong> — neither Denmark, Norway, nor Finland has accessibility in the constitutional canon. Sweden innovates here.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context">🚪 C3 — Migration Legislative Blitz in EU + Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-migration-policy-posture-2026">Migration-Policy Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration-policy-posture-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context">🚪 C3 — Migration Legislative Blitz in EU + Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-migration-policy-posture-2026">Migration-Policy Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration-policy-posture-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2462,7 +2462,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-migration-policy-posture-2026">Migration-Policy Posture (2026)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 migration-policy direction</th><th align="center">ECHR sensitivity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Tightening: new reception law (HD03229) + deportation (HD03235) + inhibition (HD01SfU22)</td><td align="center"><strong>High — V/C/MP litigation predicate prepared</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Already-tightened 2015–2024; marginal additional tightening</td><td align="center">Low (tested through litigation already)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Moderate — Støre government recalibrating</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Tightening under Orpo coalition (2024/25 reforms)</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Tightening under Schoof cabinet (2024–)</td><td align="center">High (litigation active)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Tightening under Scholz/Merz transition</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Post-Rwanda policy shift; Labour recalibration</td><td align="center">Medium-High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>Tightening ongoing</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden is <strong>part of a broader European tightening wave</strong> (NL, DE, FI, UK). However, the <strong>simultaneous ECHR-litigation-predicate architecture</strong> prepared by V + C + MP is distinctive — only NL has equivalent coordinated civil-society + parliamentary litigation posture. Swedish migration bills therefore face the <strong>most prepared domestic legal-challenge environment</strong> in the Nordic region.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics">Reception-Law Comparison (HD03229 specifics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics">Reception-Law Comparison (HD03229 specifics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2501,8 +2501,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics">Reception-Law Comparison
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Reception standard</th><th>Relation to EU Reception Directive (2013/33)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03229)</td><td>Tightened — narrower eligibility, tighter conditions</td><td>Approaches minimum floor of directive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Opt-out from RCEU; domestic regime</td><td>n/a (opt-out)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Implementation of 2024 EU Pact revisions</td><td>Directive-compliant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Tightened</td><td>At minimum floor; challenged</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Rebalancing 2024/25</td><td>Above minimum</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: HD03229 takes Sweden closer to the <strong>minimum floor of the EU Reception Directive</strong>. Below-floor implementation creates Commission infringement risk; at-floor creates litigation risk via individual applications to ECHR and CJEU. Likely trigger: H2 2026 NGO-filed individual applications.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context">🏛️ C4 — Ukraine Accountability Architecture (HD03231 + HD03232) in International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15">State-of-Ukraine-Tribunal Participation (as of 2026-04-15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context">🏛️ C4 — Ukraine Accountability Architecture (HD03231 + HD03232) in International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15">State-of-Ukraine-Tribunal Participation (as of 2026-04-15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2575,7 +2575,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15">State-of-Uk
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>State</th><th>Formal accession status</th><th align="center">Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03231)</td><td><strong>Submitted 2026-04-16; vote May 2026</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Founding member</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Poland</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Czechia</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Baltic states</strong> (EE, LV, LT)</td><td>Founding members</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Japan</strong></td><td>Observer/support</td><td align="center">△</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td><strong>Ambiguous — no formal accession as of 2026-04-15</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (pending)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden joins the <strong>strongest Euro-Atlantic coalition of accountability states</strong> — 20+ European + Commonwealth jurisdictions. Swedish membership adds <strong>Nordic credibility</strong> to the tribunal architecture. US non-participation is the single largest operational question for tribunal effectiveness. Without US cooperation, the tribunal's asset-tracing and extradition authority is constrained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture">Reparations Commission (HD03232) Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture">Reparations Commission (HD03232) Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2619,8 +2619,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture">Reparations Commission (
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Commission membership</th><th>Reparation funding source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03232)</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>Immobilised Russian assets (Euroclear, SE)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU</strong> (joint position)</td><td>Common framework</td><td>EUR 260 B immobilised (Euroclear BE + member-state holdings)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Active</td><td>BoE + crown-asset freeze</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Active</td><td>Bank-asset freeze</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Japan</strong></td><td>Observer</td><td>Sanctions-framework-aligned</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td>Active on sanctions, ambiguous on reparations</td><td>Asset freeze only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Swedish accession to the Reparations Commission carries <strong>no direct fiscal burden</strong> — reparations are funded from immobilised Russian sovereign and individual assets. However, the Nuremberg framing of the parent tribunal pre-empts domestic SD-led fiscal critique.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing">⚡ C5 — Energy Reform (HD03240 Electricity System + HD03239 Wind-Power Revenue Sharing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026">Nordic Electricity-Market Reform Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing">⚡ C5 — Energy Reform (HD03240 Electricity System + HD03239 Wind-Power Revenue Sharing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026">Nordic Electricity-Market Reform Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2663,7 +2663,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026">Nordic Electricity-Mar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 electricity reform direction</th><th align="center">Grid-capacity priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03240)</td><td>New electricity-system law (market design update + capacity mechanism)</td><td align="center">High — SE3/SE4 bottleneck</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Offshore-wind + interconnection expansion</td><td align="center">High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Oil-fund-funded grid investment</td><td align="center">High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>OL3 online; grid modernisation</td><td align="center">Medium-high</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Kraftwerkssicherheitsgesetz (2024)</td><td align="center">High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>REMA (Review of Electricity Market Arrangements)</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's HD03240 is <strong>aligned with Nordic neighbours</strong> on grid modernisation. Convergent on capacity-mechanism design; divergent on carbon-price interaction (Sweden's fuel-tax cut creates a cross-cluster tension with HD03240's low-carbon goals).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239">Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing Models (HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239">Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing Models (HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2696,8 +2696,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239">Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Municipal revenue-sharing model</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03239)</td><td><strong>New — revenue share to host municipalities</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Eiendomsskatt + landowner rent; established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>VE-bonus; established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>EEG / Bürgerenergie provisions; established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Community benefit funds; established</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: HD03239 <strong>catches Sweden up with Nordic + German peers</strong> on a widely-adopted revenue-sharing model. This is <strong>follower legislation</strong>, not innovation — but the Swedish framing is unusually clear on municipal-financial incentive design.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context">🛡️ C6 — NATO eFP Deployment (HD01UFöU3) in Alliance Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026">NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context">🛡️ C6 — NATO eFP Deployment (HD01UFöU3) in Alliance Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026">NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026">NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Contributor</th><th>Deployment posture to Finland</th><th align="center">Scale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD01UFöU3)</td><td><strong>First major deployment post-NATO accession</strong></td><td align="center">1,200 troops</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Estonia (Tapa) — persistent</td><td align="center">≈ 900</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Lithuania (Rukla → Kaunas) — expanding</td><td align="center">≈ 4,800 (2027 target)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Latvia (Adazi)</td><td align="center">≈ 2,200 (expanding to brigade)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US</strong></td><td>Poland (persistent)</td><td align="center">≈ 10,000</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Romania (eVA)</td><td align="center">≈ 1,500</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Lithuania (rotational) + Finland support</td><td align="center">≈ 200–400</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden's 1,200-troop deployment to Finland is <strong>proportionate to mid-tier European contributors</strong> and establishes operational integration immediately post-accession. Comparable to French Romania deployment in scale. Doctrinal precedent: Sweden moves from accession (March 2024) to operational contribution within 2 years — a <strong>rapid integration timeline</strong> by Nordic historical standards.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks">📊 Summary: Sweden's Position in 5 Cluster-Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks">📊 Summary: Sweden's Position in 5 Cluster-Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2802,26 +2802,26 @@ <h2 id="rm--summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks">📊 Summary: Swed
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Sweden's Posture</th><th>Vs Nordic Peers</th><th>Vs EU Peers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal trilogy</td><td>Stimulus + fuel-tax cut</td><td><strong>Nordic outlier (carbon-policy reversal)</strong></td><td>Below Nordic benchmarks on climate; comparable on targeted relief</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 constitutional</td><td>Narrowing digital FOI on seized material</td><td><strong>Nordic-aligned</strong></td><td>Stricter than DE (StPO); Nordic-normal</td></tr><tr><td>KU32 constitutional</td><td>Accessibility in grundlag</td><td><strong>Nordic-leading</strong></td><td>Nordic-leading</td></tr><tr><td>Migration blitz</td><td>Tightening</td><td><strong>Part of Nordic wave (FI, DK parallel)</strong></td><td>Part of EU wave; most-prepared litigation-predicate environment</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal</td><td>Founding member</td><td><strong>Aligned with NATO-Europe + UK</strong></td><td>Joined the core coalition</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP</td><td>1,200 troops to Finland</td><td><strong>First operational NATO output</strong></td><td>Mid-tier contribution</td></tr><tr><td>Energy reform</td><td>Electricity-system + wind-revenue share</td><td><strong>Follower</strong> (Nordic catch-up)</td><td>Comparable to DE, DK, NO</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications">🔍 Where Sweden Diverges — Narrative Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications">🔍 Where Sweden Diverges — Narrative Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fuel-tax cut = Nordic outlier</strong> ⇒ climate-credibility cost; media attack surface from MP + V; L + KD internal strain</li>
 <li><strong>ECHR-litigation-predicate architecture on migration = uniquely coordinated</strong> ⇒ post-enactment legal exposure higher than DK (which has opt-outs) or FI</li>
 <li><strong>KU33 interpretive ambiguity = idiosyncratic Swedish risk</strong> ⇒ Lagrådet Q2 2026 yttrande is the single most consequential upcoming legal document</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-innovates">🔭 Where Sweden Innovates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-innovates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates">🔭 Where Sweden Innovates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>KU32 accessibility in grundlag</strong> — first Nordic jurisdiction to embed</li>
 <li><strong>HD03232 reparations commission accession timing</strong> — Sweden in founding cohort</li>
 <li><strong>HD03239 wind-power revenue-sharing</strong> — clearest Nordic-convergent municipal-incentive design</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-follows">🔁 Where Sweden Follows<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-follows"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-follows">🔁 Where Sweden Follows<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-follows"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Migration tightening</strong> — follows NL, FI, DE, UK wave</li>
 <li><strong>Electricity-system reform</strong> — catches up with Nordic neighbours</li>
 <li><strong>NATO eFP</strong> — mid-tier contribution post-accession</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference">📎 Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference">📎 Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code></a> — canonical Week-16 benchmark baseline (extended here to 30-day forward)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md</code></a> — KU32/KU33 constitutional-cluster deep-dive</li>
@@ -2830,7 +2830,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-reference">📎 Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 (weekly checkpoint) or on material jurisdiction-shift · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2862,7 +2862,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>30-day forward (2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19); 90-day supplementary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 (CIA triad + sensitivity tier + domain taxonomy + urgency matrix) + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5 coverage-completeness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Classified</strong></td><td>24 primary + 19 counter-motions tracked</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2896,7 +2896,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classif
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Definition</th><th>Documents This Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🔴 P0 — Constitutional / Critical</strong></td><td>Grundlag amendments; democratic-infrastructure changes; reversal window decadal</td><td><code>HD01KU32</code> (accessibility · rights-positive), <code>HD01KU33</code> (digital-evidence search/seizure · press-freedom risk)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟠 P1 — Strategic National</strong></td><td>Foreign-policy treaty accession; major fiscal commitments; criminal-justice frame; security operations</td><td><code>HD03100</code>, <code>HD0399</code>, <code>HD03236</code> (fiscal trilogy); <code>HD03220</code>, <code>HD01UFöU3</code> (NATO eFP); <code>HD03231</code>, <code>HD03232</code> (Ukraine accountability); <code>HD03229</code>, <code>HD03235</code>, <code>HD01SfU22</code> (migration blitz); <code>HD03246</code> (juvenile tightening); <code>HD03237</code> (police training)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟡 P2 — Sector / Regulated</strong></td><td>Energy, housing, accessibility, sector-specific reforms</td><td><code>HD03240</code>, <code>HD03239</code>, <code>HD01SkU23</code> (energy); <code>HD03244</code>, <code>HD01TU21</code> (digital); <code>HD03238</code> (environmental permitting); <code>HD03245</code> (violence-against-women strategy); <code>HD01CU27</code>, <code>HD01CU28</code> (housing register)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟢 P3 — Routine / Administrative</strong></td><td>EU-directive transposition, sector updates, Riksrevisionen reports</td><td><code>HD01MJU19</code> (waste legislation), <code>HD03242</code> (forestry framework), <code>HD03241</code> (Riksrevisionen fiscal-framework report), <code>HD0398</code> (tax-expenditure report), <code>HD03101</code> (state annual report 2025)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity-tier insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: The 30-day window contains <strong>2 P0 constitutional items</strong>, <strong>12 P1 strategic-national items</strong>, and <strong>9 P2 sector-regulated items</strong> — the highest concentration of P0 + P1 in a single 30-day window observed in the 2025/26 session. This confirms the <strong>pre-election maximalist legislative posture</strong> identified at the aggregate level.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Where CIA = <strong>C</strong>onfidentiality (information protection / institutional secrecy), <strong>I</strong>ntegrity (rule-of-law durability + transparency), <strong>A</strong>vailability (citizen access to rights / services). Scored ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3083,7 +3083,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Confidentiality</th><th align="center">Integrity</th><th align="center">Availability</th><th align="center">Net Democratic Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (raises confidentiality of police-seized digital material)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (narrows transparency / "allmän handling")</td><td align="center">🟧 M (citizens lose insight into investigations)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on transparency</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M (no change)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rights-positive — accessibility entrenched in grundlag)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (citizens with disabilities gain access)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>Net positive on rights</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 (Vårproposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (fiscal accountability framework intact)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (welfare delivery + relief)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399 (Vårändringsbudget)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236 (Extra ändringsbudget — fuel-tax cut)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (direct household relief)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive (climate-caveat)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (JuU juvenile tightening)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (juvenile-data confidentiality concerns from longer remand)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (extends carceral state vs rehab)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (police investigative capacity ↑; juvenile rights ↓)</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>Mixed</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 (Ukraine Special Tribunal)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rule-of-law + accountability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (no direct citizen impact)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 (Reparations Commission)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (reparations rule-of-law architecture)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03229 (Reception law)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (eligibility narrowed)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on rights</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03235 (Deportation rules)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces procedural protection)</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on rights (ECHR risk)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22 (Inhibition orders)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces appeal mechanism)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (asylum-seeker access ↓)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on rights (ECHR risk)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3 / HD03220 (NATO eFP Finland)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (military operational secrecy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (NATO Article 5 credibility)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (förändrar säkerhetsläget)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (Electricity-system laws)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (legal coherence ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (smart-grid investment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239 (Wind-power revenue sharing)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H (municipal revenue + climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23 (EV-charging tax relief)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H (green-mobility incentive)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238 (New environmental permitting agency)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M (institutional complexity short-term)</td><td align="center">🟧 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245 (Violence-against-women strategy)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (victim privacy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H (services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237 (Paid police training)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (recruitment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (police capacity)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27 (Identity for property registration)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (data integrity)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (AML enforcement ↑)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (consumer protection ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 (National housing register)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (register data)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (market integrity ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (property-market transparency ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244 (Data interoperability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (cross-agency services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21 (State e-ID)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (authentication)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (fraud reduction ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (digital services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242 (Forestry framework)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Mixed (climate trade-off)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19 (Waste legislation)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU compliance ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (circular economy ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net democratic impact summary</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: 14 documents are <strong>net positive</strong> on democratic impact; 3 documents are <strong>net negative on rights</strong> (migration trio: HD03229, HD03235, HD01SfU22); 2 documents are <strong>mixed</strong> (HD03246 juvenile, HD03238 permitting); 1 document is <strong>net negative on transparency</strong> (HD01KU33). The rights-negative cluster is the <strong>single most concentrated rights-sensitive package</strong> in the 2025/26 session, validating the ECHR-litigation-predicate analysis.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact">🏛️ Per-Document Classification Matrix (Domain + Controversy + Urgency + EU impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact">🏛️ Per-Document Classification Matrix (Domain + Controversy + Urgency + EU impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3366,7 +3366,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Political Valence</th><th>Ideological Driver</th><th align="center">Controversy</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">EU Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>Macroeconomic</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Fiscal conservatism + election spending</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟧 M (Stability Pact)</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Budget management</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>Energy/fiscal</td><td>Right-populist</td><td>Cost-of-living relief + fossil industry</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU carbon pricing / state aid)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03229</td><td>Reception law</td><td>Migration</td><td>Far-Right</td><td>SD core agenda</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU Reception Directive 2013/33)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Deportation rules</td><td>Justice/Migration</td><td>Right-populist</td><td>SD agenda</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU returns directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition orders</td><td>Migration/Legal</td><td>Far-Right</td><td>SD core agenda</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (ECHR Art 3/8 exposure)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Juvenile tightening</td><td>Criminal justice</td><td>Right-Conservative</td><td>Law and order, SD-aligned</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Paid police training</td><td>Justice/Security</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Recruitment pragmatism</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220 / HD01UFöU3</td><td>NATO eFP Finland</td><td>Defence/Foreign</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>NATO Article 5 commitment</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (NATO integration)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Special Tribunal (Ukraine)</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Rule-of-law norm entrepreneurship</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU common foreign policy)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Reparations Commission (Ukraine)</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Rule-of-law norm entrepreneurship</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (immobilised Russian assets)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Accessibility in grundlag</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Disability rights</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P0</td><td align="center">🟧 M (EU accessibility directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Digital-evidence narrowing</td><td>Constitutional/Press</td><td>Right-Conservative</td><td>Investigation efficacy</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P0</td><td align="center">🟧 M (ECHR Art 10 exposure)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity-system laws</td><td>Energy</td><td>Center</td><td>Energy security, transition</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU electricity directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind-power revenue sharing</td><td>Energy/Local Gov</td><td>Center</td><td>Municipal acceptance</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>EV-charging tax relief</td><td>Tax/Energy</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Green-mobility pragmatism</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Environmental permitting agency</td><td>Environment</td><td>Center</td><td>Institutional modernisation</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M (EU water/air directives)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Data interoperability</td><td>Digital/Admin</td><td>Center</td><td>EU digital single market</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (EU Data Act / Interoperability Act)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>State e-ID</td><td>Digital</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Fraud reduction</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU eIDAS 2.0)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Violence-against-women strategy</td><td>Social/Gender</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Rights-frame</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M (Istanbul Convention)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property-registration identity</td><td>Housing/Crime</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>AML-frame</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU AML-package)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Housing register</td><td>Housing</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Market integrity</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Waste legislation</td><td>Environment/EU</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>EU compliance</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P3</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (EU waste framework)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Forestry framework</td><td>Agriculture/Environment</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Forestry-industry pragmatism</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">P3</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU Forest Strategy, LULUCF)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-decision-tree-visual">🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (visual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-decision-tree-visual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-visual">🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (visual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-visual"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A[New dok in 30-day window] --> B{Constitutional&#x3C;br/>grundlag change?}
     B -->|Yes| P0["🔴 P0 — Constitutional/Critical&#x3C;br/>Requires 2 Riksdag votes bracketing election"]
@@ -3381,7 +3381,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-decision-tree-visual">🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (vi
     P2 --> Z[Cover in week-ahead + weekly-review]
     P3 --> W[Cover in monthly / quarterly review]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--policy-domain-distribution">🌐 Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--policy-domain-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-distribution">🌐 Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3456,7 +3456,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--policy-domain-distribution">🌐 Policy Domain Distribution<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Example dok_ids</th><th align="center">Election-2026 Salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal / Economic</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (cost-of-living)</td></tr><tr><td>Migration / Justice</td><td align="center">5</td><td>HD03229, HD03235, HD01SfU22, HD03246, HD03237</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign / Defence (Ukraine+NATO)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03220, HD01UFöU3, HD03231, HD03232</td><td align="center">🟧 M (cross-party)</td></tr><tr><td>Energy / Climate</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03236 (overlap), HD03240, HD03239, HD01SkU23</td><td align="center">🟩 H (climate dimension)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td align="center">🟥 L (unless chilling-effect case breaks)</td></tr><tr><td>Digital / Admin</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03244, HD01TU21</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>Social / Gender / Rights</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03245, HD10438 (interpellation)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Housing / Property</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Environment (pure)</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03238, HD01MJU19</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry / Agriculture</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD03242</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The four highest-salience domains (Fiscal, Migration/Justice, Foreign/Defence, Energy/Climate) contain <strong>17 of 24 documents</strong> — this confirms the month-ahead has a <strong>concentrated campaign-relevance footprint</strong> that maps directly onto the expected 2026 campaign themes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-governing-coalition-policy-vector">🏛️ Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">🏛️ Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h3>
 <p>The April–May 2026 legislative cluster represents a <strong>rightward acceleration</strong> in coalition policy as elections approach, but with three domain-specific exceptions:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Criminal justice</strong>: Punitive turn on juvenile crime (HD03246) + paid police training (HD03237) advances SD/M joint agenda</li>
@@ -3523,13 +3523,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-governing-coalition-policy-vector">🏛️ Governing Coalition Po
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">Tension level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03236 (fuel-tax cut)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (climate)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (climate)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟧 Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD03229 / HD03235 (migration)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (liberal-humanitarian)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟧 Medium (L identity strain)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (juvenile)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (juvenile-rights)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟥 Low-Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33 (digital-evidence)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (transparency)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟥 Low-Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 / HD03239 (energy)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (local-impact)</td><td align="center">🟥 Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-conflict-lines">⚖️ Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-conflict-lines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conflict-lines">⚖️ Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conflict-lines"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition vs. Opposition</strong>: All fiscal-cut + migration + HD01KU33 measures have clear left-right fault lines. The 19 counter-motions filed by S/V/MP/C are the structural evidence.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition internal</strong>: L's liberal values create tension with HD03246 juvenile rights provisions, HD01SfU22 humanitarian concerns, and HD03236 climate reversal. KD's climate/family-values profile creates minor tension on fuel-tax cut.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden vs. EU</strong>: HD03236 (fuel-tax cuts) creates tension with EU's carbon-pricing agenda + potential state-aid scrutiny; HD01SfU22 + HD03229 face EU Reception-Directive and ECHR compatibility questions.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden vs. Nordic peers</strong>: HD03236 is a <strong>Nordic outlier on climate discipline</strong> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §C1.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--eu--international-impact-summary">🌍 EU / International Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--eu--international-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-eu--international-impact-summary">🌍 EU / International Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu--international-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3632,7 +3632,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--eu--international-impact-summary">🌍 EU / International Impact Sum
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>EU / International Regime</th><th>Affected dok_ids</th><th>Risk type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EU Reception Directive (2013/33)</td><td>HD03229</td><td>Infringement / minimum-floor compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU Returns Directive</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR Art 3 (prohibition of torture)</td><td>HD01SfU22, HD03229, HD03235</td><td>Individual-application litigation</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR Art 8 (family life)</td><td>HD01SfU22, HD03229</td><td>Individual-application litigation</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR Art 10 (expression)</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Press-freedom case-law exposure</td></tr><tr><td>EU Stability &#x26; Growth Pact</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Fiscal surveillance</td></tr><tr><td>EU State Aid (Art 107 TFEU)</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Commission notification required</td></tr><tr><td>EU Carbon Pricing / EU ETS</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Climate-policy coherence</td></tr><tr><td>EU Electricity Directive</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU eIDAS 2.0</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU Data Act / Interoperability Act</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU AML-package</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU Forest Strategy / LULUCF</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Climate-reporting coherence</td></tr><tr><td>EU Waste Framework</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>NATO / Washington Treaty</td><td>HD01UFöU3, HD03220</td><td>Operational integration</td></tr><tr><td>Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression (UN-framed)</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Founding-member status</td></tr><tr><td>International Compensation Commission (Ukraine)</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Founding-member status</td></tr><tr><td>Istanbul Convention</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Compliance + narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-historical-classification-analogy">🕰️ Historical Classification Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-historical-classification-analogy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-classification-analogy">🕰️ Historical Classification Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-classification-analogy"></a></h3>
 <p>This legislative sprint is analogous to the <strong>Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal expansion</strong> (anti-austerity during financial crisis) in its use of supplementary-budget mechanisms — but with three key differences:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Direction</strong>: Reinfeldt 2009 was centrist crisis-management; Tidö 2026 is ideologically homogeneous (right-populist). The fuel-tax cut is the signature ideological marker.</li>
@@ -3640,7 +3640,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-historical-classification-analogy">🕰️ Historical Classificat
 <li><strong>International commitments</strong>: Reinfeldt 2009 used financial-crisis cooperation; Tidö 2026 makes <strong>2 decadal commitments</strong> (Ukraine tribunal, NATO eFP) that outlast any single parliamentary term.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--references">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-references">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — composite scoring methodology and coverage-completeness gate</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — L×I risk-scored per cluster with 30/60/90-day triggers</li>
@@ -3651,12 +3651,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--references">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:37:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-network">Thematic Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster">Budget &#x26; Fiscal Policy Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-network">Thematic Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster">Budget &#x26; Fiscal Policy Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03100</strong> (Spring Economic Proposition) ↔ <strong>HD0399</strong> (Supplementary Budget) ↔ <strong>HD03236</strong> (Extra Budget: Fuel Tax)</li>
 <li>All three go through FiU (Finance Committee)</li>
@@ -3664,7 +3664,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster">Budget &#x26; Fiscal Policy Cluster<a
 <li>Interpellations: HD10433 (tax reform overview), HD10427 (PostNord/state ownership)</li>
 <li>Economic framework: HD03241 (Riksrevisionen fiscal framework report), HD03101 (State Annual Report 2025), HD0398 (Tax expenditure report)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster">Ukraine &#x26; International Security Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster">Ukraine &#x26; International Security Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03231</strong> (Ukraine Tribunal) ↔ <strong>HD03232</strong> (Ukraine Compensation Commission) ↔ <strong>HD03220</strong> (NATO Finland)</li>
 <li>HD03220/HD01UFöU3: UFöU committee report already issued — most advanced in legislative pipeline</li>
@@ -3672,7 +3672,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster">Ukraine &#x26; International
 <li>Cross-party support expected; these bills are not controversial across party lines</li>
 <li>International context: UN/ICC developments on Ukraine accountability</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-migration--justice-cluster">Migration &#x26; Justice Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration--justice-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-migration--justice-cluster">Migration &#x26; Justice Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration--justice-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03229</strong> (Reception Law) ↔ <strong>HD03235</strong> (Deportation Rules) ↔ <strong>HD01SfU22</strong> (Inhibition Orders)</li>
 <li>All handled by SfU (Social Insurance/Migration Committee)</li>
@@ -3680,28 +3680,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-migration--justice-cluster">Migration &#x26; Justice Cluster<a class=
 <li>Counter-motion network: V (HD024090), MP (HD024097), C (HD024095) on deportation; S (HD024080), MP (HD024087), C (HD024089) on reception law</li>
 <li>Interpellation links: HD10429 (freedom of speech / prop 133), HD10420 (police authority), HD10422 (integration/labour)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-energy--climate-cluster">Energy &#x26; Climate Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy--climate-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy--climate-cluster">Energy &#x26; Climate Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy--climate-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03240</strong> (Electricity Laws) ↔ <strong>HD03239</strong> (Wind Power) ↔ <strong>HD01SkU23</strong> (EV Charging Tax Relief)</li>
 <li>HD03238 (Environmental Permitting Agency) linked to siting of energy infrastructure</li>
 <li>Counter-motion: HD024098, HD024092 (V, MP opposing fuel tax = climate conflict with HD03236)</li>
 <li>Constitutional link: HD01MJU19 (Waste Legislation) also in MJU</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-digital-governance-cluster">Digital Governance Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-digital-governance-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-digital-governance-cluster">Digital Governance Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-digital-governance-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03244</strong> (Data Interoperability) ↔ <strong>HD01TU21</strong> (State e-ID)</li>
 <li>HD03214-related: HD024093 (C motion on cybersecurity centre)</li>
 <li>All linked to Sweden's EU digital single market obligations</li>
 <li>Intersects with HD01KU33 (public documents/digital files)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-housing--property-cluster">Housing &#x26; Property Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-housing--property-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-housing--property-cluster">Housing &#x26; Property Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-housing--property-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28</strong> (National Housing Register) ↔ <strong>HD01CU27</strong> (Identity for Property Registration)</li>
 <li>Interpellation link: HD10434 (Stockholm housing construction decline)</li>
 <li>Anti-money-laundering dimension: identity requirements connect to financial crime prevention</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-decision-dependencies">Key Decision Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decision-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-decision-dependencies">Key Decision Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decision-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>HD03236 (Fuel Tax Vote)
     → FiU committee report [2-3 weeks]
     → Plenary vote [late April/early May]
@@ -3719,7 +3719,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-decision-dependencies">Key Decision Dependencies<a class="" aria-
     → Post-enactment: court challenges likely
 </code></pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-count-by-committee">Document Count by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-count-by-committee"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-count-by-committee">Document Count by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-count-by-committee"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3819,7 +3819,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-count-by-committee">Document Count by Committee<a class="" a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Committee</th><th>Propositions</th><th>Betänkanden</th><th>Motions</th><th>Interpellations</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU (Finance)</td><td>6 (budgets + fiscal)</td><td>2+</td><td>4</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>SfU (Social/Migration)</td><td>3 (migration)</td><td>2</td><td>7</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU (Foreign/Defence)</td><td>3 (Ukraine/NATO)</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>UU (Foreign Affairs)</td><td>2 (Ukraine)</td><td>0</td><td>2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>JuU (Justice)</td><td>3 (crime/police)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>NU/KlN (Energy)</td><td>3 (electricity)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>KU (Constitutional)</td><td>0</td><td>2 (vilande)</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>MJU (Environment)</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>TU (Transport)</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>0</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>AU (Labour)</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>SoU (Health)</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>CU (Civil)</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Observation</strong>: FiU and SfU carry the heaviest legislative load in this period, reflecting the government's dual priority of economic management and migration control.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3855,7 +3855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>MET-ID</strong></td><td>MET-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19 (30-day base; 90-day and post-election extensions)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology Audited</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Self-Audit Type</strong></td><td>Per Rule 7 (Reference-Grade Self-Audit)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Continuity Window</strong></td><td>2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 (5 days, 7 sibling runs)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7, every reference-grade analysis package must include an explicit <strong>methodology self-audit</strong> documenting:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Which methodologies were applied to which analytical artefacts</li>
@@ -3867,7 +3867,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ol>
 <p>This file makes the analysis <strong>legible to readers, auditors, and methodology owners</strong> and creates a feedback loop into the canonical methodology guides.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3983,11 +3983,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology</th><th>Doctrine Source</th><th>Applied to Files</th><th align="center">Application Quality</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DIW v1.0 (Democratic-Impact Weighting)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>significance-scoring.md</code>, <code>README.md</code> §Lead-Story Decision, <code>executive-brief.md</code> §BLUF</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (lead-story DIW weighted 9.8/9.5/9.3 across three co-prominent clusters)</td></tr><tr><td>5-dimension significance composite</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Top-20 Ranking</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (20 documents scored)</td></tr><tr><td>CIA-triad classification</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code> §CIA-Triad Impact</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (per-document)</td></tr><tr><td>Sensitivity-tier classification (P0–P3)</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code> §Tier Summary</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage-Completeness gate (composite ≥ 70)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Coverage gate, <code>executive-brief.md</code> §Bullet 8</td><td align="center">🟩 H (all 20 ≥ 65 → all candidate for article coverage)</td></tr><tr><td>8-stakeholder SWOT</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code> (mandatory 8 groups completed)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>TOWS cross-cluster interference</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code> §Stakeholder Analysis cross-cluster, <code>README.md</code> §cross-cluster tension</td><td align="center">🟧 M (implicit; could be made explicit in future runs)</td></tr><tr><td>5×5 risk matrix + Bayesian + ALARP + cascading</td><td><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center">🟩 H (8 risks; heatmap; cascading mentioned in R2→R7 chain)</td></tr><tr><td>STRIDE / Attack-tree / Kill-chain / Diamond</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1–T4</td><td align="center">🟧 M (severity ranking present; per-letter STRIDE decomposition abbreviated — acceptable for 30-day horizon)</td></tr><tr><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Scenario Analysis</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §ACH Grid</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian priors with named triggers</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code></td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §90-Day Monitoring Calendar; <code>risk-assessment.md</code> §Forward Indicators</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative benchmarking (Rule 8)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> (8 jurisdictions)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster thematic mapping</td><td>Internal practice</td><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code> (6 clusters + counter-motion network)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Election-2026 lens</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5/6</td><td>All Tier-A/B files §Election 2026</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (mandatory section met)</td></tr><tr><td>Provenance discipline</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2</td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>5-level confidence scale</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 4</td><td>All files (visible in tables)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (NEW)</strong></td><td><strong>Added as Rule 9 candidate</strong> (see Recommendations §3)</td><td>This file §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows">🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory for Aggregation Workflows)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows">🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory for Aggregation Workflows)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Per the "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol added to <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code></strong>, every forward indicator issued in the last 5 days of sibling daily runs MUST be either <strong>carried forward</strong> into this month-ahead package or <strong>explicitly retired</strong> with a one-line reason.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18">Forward Indicators Ingested from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18">Forward Indicators Ingested from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4087,7 +4087,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18">Forward Indi
 <p><strong>Reconciliation summary</strong>: 14 of 16 upstream watchpoints carried forward; 2 explicitly retired (outside 30-day horizon); 1 carried with reduced priority (S-leadership KU33 position, since 30-day window pre-dates likely crystallisation).</p>
 <p><strong>No silent drops</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>. This establishes the <strong>continuity-of-intelligence contract</strong> required for reference-grade aggregation work.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--uncertainty-hot-spots">🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-uncertainty-hot-spots">🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h3>
 <p>The following dimensions of this month-ahead package carry <strong>structural uncertainty</strong> that should be tracked explicitly:</p>
 
 
@@ -4160,7 +4160,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--uncertainty-hot-spots">🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Hot-Spot</th><th>Source of Uncertainty</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">U1</td><td>Post-Sep Riksdag composition</td><td>Entirely contingent on election</td><td align="center">🟥 L (post-Sep)</td><td>Treated via scenario bands (S1/S2/S3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U2</td><td>Lagrådet interpretation of <em>"formellt tillförd bevisning"</em> in HD01KU33</td><td>Legal-interpretive uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Comparative benchmark (Nordic press-freedom regimes) provides prior</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U3</td><td>US cooperation with HD03231 tribunal</td><td>Public US statements ambiguous</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td>Black-swan B1 path modelled</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U4</td><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response timing/magnitude</td><td>Strategic-actor choice</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Wildcard W1 baseline rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U5</td><td>ECHR docket pace on inhibition-orders challenge</td><td>Court-scheduling uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Wildcard W2 tracks</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U6</td><td>Q1 2026 macro data direction (SCB 2026-05-28)</td><td>Data-release uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟩 H (baseline direction)</td><td>Single most decisive pre-summer indicator</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U7</td><td>Coalition-internal discipline on fuel-tax-cut climate tension</td><td>L + KD identity strain</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Watched via Alliansen party-conference statements</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U8</td><td>Counter-motion → manifesto translation success</td><td>Media-framing contingent</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Track legacy-media coverage of HD024079-HD024097 series</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall confidence</strong> for this package <code>[HIGH — 🟩]</code>: 30-day legislative calendar is near-certain; vote outcomes on Tidö majority bills are highly certain (JuU15 145–142 signature validated); scenario bands beyond 30 days carry irreducible election-year uncertainty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-known-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>30-day horizon truncation</strong>: Some upstream watchpoints (e.g., W10 RSF 2027 publication, W11 Lantmäteriet Q3 procurement) fall outside this window and cannot be followed here. They are preserved for annual/quarterly outlooks.</p>
@@ -4182,7 +4182,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidde
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h3>
 <p>Per the <code>copilot-instructions.md</code> <strong>AI FIRST</strong> principle (minimum 2 complete iterations), this package was iterated from a 9-artifact base to a 14-artifact reference-grade package. Specific improvements:</p>
 
 
@@ -4224,24 +4224,24 @@ <h2 id="rm--pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvem
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Improvement</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5 new Tier-C artefacts added</td><td><code>README.md</code> · <code>executive-brief.md</code> · <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> · <code>comparative-international.md</code> · <code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>Upstream watchpoint reconciliation added</td><td>This file §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation — 16 watchpoints audited</td></tr><tr><td><code>classification-results.md</code> expanded from composite-table only to CIA-triad + sensitivity-tier + domain distribution + Nordic + EU benchmarks</td><td>See enriched file</td></tr><tr><td>Named-politician attribution increased</td><td>13+ ministers/party leaders named in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a> §Named Actors</td></tr><tr><td>30-day vote calendar added</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a> §30-Day Vote Calendar</td></tr><tr><td>ACH grid for 30-day resolution added</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §ACH Grid</td></tr><tr><td>8-jurisdiction comparative benchmark added</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Single-pass output (the original 9-artefact base) was <strong>shallow</strong> on upstream continuity and comparative benchmarking. The Pass-2 improvement transforms the package into a <strong>reference-grade aggregation artefact</strong> matching the 2026-04-18/weekly-review exemplar bar.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">💡 Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows">R1. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "14 REQUIRED Artifacts for Aggregation Workflows"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">💡 Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows">R1. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "14 REQUIRED Artifacts for Aggregation Workflows"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The 9-artefact gate applies to all workflows. <strong>Aggregation workflows</strong> (month-ahead, week-ahead, evening-analysis, weekly-review, monthly-review) should additionally produce 5 Tier-C reference-grade artefacts: <code>README.md</code>, <code>executive-brief.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, <code>comparative-international.md</code>, <code>methodology-reflection.md</code>. This brings aggregation workflows to the 14-artefact reference-grade bar established by <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/</code></a>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol">R2. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol">R2. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Aggregation workflows MUST read every <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>significance-scoring.md</code> from the last <strong>N days</strong> of sibling daily runs (N = 7 for week-ahead, 14 for month-ahead, 14–30 for monthly-review). Every forward indicator in those upstream files MUST be either <strong>carried forward</strong> or <strong>explicitly retired</strong> in the aggregation package's <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation. No silent drops.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9">R3. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Promote Upstream Continuity to Rule 9<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9">R3. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Promote Upstream Continuity to Rule 9<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Add <strong>Rule 9: Upstream Continuity Contract</strong> to the canonical rule set. Any aggregation work whose horizon overlaps a prior run's forward indicators MUST reconcile them in a dedicated section. This is the <strong>continuity-of-intelligence discipline</strong> that makes the monitor a coherent ongoing intelligence product rather than a series of disconnected snapshots.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt">R4. <code>news-month-ahead.md</code> — Update Workflow Prompt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt">R4. <code>news-month-ahead.md</code> — Update Workflow Prompt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The month-ahead workflow prompt (and peer aggregation workflow prompts) should explicitly require the 14-artefact production and the upstream watchpoint reconciliation before article generation. See PR for proposed diff.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r5-template-updates">R5. Template Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-template-updates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r5-template-updates">R5. Template Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-template-updates"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Add template stubs to <code>analysis/templates/</code>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -4253,7 +4253,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r5-template-updates">R5. Template Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--references-1">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-references-1">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied; Rule 9 proposed here)</li>
 <li><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</li>
@@ -4265,10 +4265,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--references-1">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: on any material methodology-doctrine update · <strong>Methodology</strong>: self-audit per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19 11:20 UTC · <strong>Pipeline mode</strong>: aggregation (live MCP + upstream synthesis)
 <strong>Produced By</strong>: <code>news-month-ahead</code> agentic workflow, consolidated by News Journalist agent</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ingestion-mode">Ingestion mode<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ingestion-mode"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ingestion-mode">Ingestion mode<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ingestion-mode"></a></h3>
 <p>This month-ahead package is an <strong>aggregation product</strong>: it does not re-download raw documents via the
 <code>download-parliamentary-data</code> script (which still reports <code>0 / 0</code> in the header block below because the
 data-download helper was not invoked for this run). Instead, evidence was gathered through two live channels
@@ -4282,7 +4282,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ingestion-mode">Ingestion mode<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 </ol>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a> §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation" for the
 audit of <strong>16 forward indicators carried forward from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 (0 silent drops)</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts">Live MCP evidence base (cited across the 14 artefacts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts">Live MCP evidence base (cited across the 14 artefacts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4321,7 +4321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts">Live MCP eviden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th>Unique <code>dok_id</code>s cited</th><th>Examples</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government propositions</strong></td><td>24</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03220, HD03229, HD03231, HD03232, HD03235, HD03237, HD03239, HD03240, HD03242, HD03244, HD03245, HD03246, HD03238, HD03241, HD03101, HD0398</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition motions</strong></td><td>15</td><td>HD024079, HD024082, HD024087, HD024088, HD024089, HD024091, HD024092, HD024097, HD024098</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee reports / vilande grundlag</strong></td><td>9</td><td>HD01UFöU3, HD01KU32, HD01KU33, HD01SfU20, HD01SfU22, HD01SkU23, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD01TU21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Parliamentary questions / interpellations</strong></td><td>13</td><td>HD10420, HD10430, HD10438, HD10427, HD10429, HD10431–HD10434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>JuU15 145–142 chamber vote</strong></td><td>1</td><td>JuU15 (2026-04-16) — working-majority discipline signature</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Total unique <code>dok_id</code> citations across the 14-artefact package: <strong>≥ 62</strong>. Complete list is machine-extractable via
 <code>grep -rhoE 'HD[0-9A-Za-zÖöÄäÅå]+' analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/*.md | sort -u</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested">Upstream sibling runs ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested">Upstream sibling runs ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4368,7 +4368,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested">Upstream sibling runs ingested<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Scope</th><th>Reconciled indicators</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/</code></a></td><td>Full 14-artefact Tier-C exemplar</td><td>Scenario bands + 16 upstream watchpoints</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/evening-analysis/"><code>2026-04-18/evening-analysis/</code></a></td><td>Evening analysis</td><td>Working-day indicators</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/"><code>2026-04-18/realtime-1705/</code></a></td><td>Late-day realtime</td><td>End-of-day chamber state</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/week-ahead/"><code>2026-04-17/week-ahead/</code></a></td><td>Week-ahead forecast</td><td>Carries week-ahead vote calendar</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/"><code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></a></td><td>Afternoon realtime</td><td>Intraday committee signals</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-16/evening-analysis/"><code>2026-04-16/evening-analysis/</code></a></td><td>JuU15 145–142 vote</td><td>Vote-discipline signature baseline</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-15/evening-analysis/"><code>2026-04-15/evening-analysis/</code></a></td><td>Evening analysis</td><td>Pre-vote committee positioning</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-external-public-data-sources">External public-data sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-public-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-public-data-sources">External public-data sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-public-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4390,7 +4390,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-public-data-sources">External public-data sources<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>File</th><th>Scope</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>World Bank Open Data API</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/economic-data.json"><code>economic-data.json</code></a></td><td>Nordic GDP (NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG), unemployment (SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS), inflation (FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG) 2021–2025</td></tr><tr><td><code>data.riksdagen.se</code> calendar feeds</td><td>Live queries</td><td>Europe Day (9 May), FöU/EUN committee schedules, Open-House weekend (14–15 May)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run">Raw document download (data-only helper — not invoked for this aggregation run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run">Raw document download (data-only helper — not invoked for this aggregation run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run"></a></h3>
 <p>The fields below are from the <code>download-parliamentary-data</code> helper. They are <code>0</code> because the aggregation
 workflow does not invoke that helper. This is <strong>not</strong> a data-quality issue — all cited evidence is sourced
 through the live MCP channel above and cross-referenced to the upstream sibling runs.</p>
@@ -4411,13 +4411,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregat
 performed by the AI agent following <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using
 templates from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All <code>HD*</code> documents cited are sourced from the official <code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> API.</li>
 <li>Upstream synthesis follows the 14-day lookback policy for <code>month-ahead</code> per
 <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"RECENT DAILY KNOWLEDGE-BASE SYNTHESIS".</li>
 <li>Upstream watchpoint reconciliation is auditable: <strong>16 indicators in → 16 indicators reconciled →
 0 silent drops</strong> (see <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation").</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4455,7 +4472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:03.690Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:25.103Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html b/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html
index b36cf3c6ab..00150287d5 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden Month-Ahead Strategic Outlook (19 April → 19 May 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.924Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.333Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:03.924Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.333Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden Month-Ahead Strategic Outlook (19 April → 19 May 2026)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:03.924Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden Month-Ahead Strategic Outlook (19 April → 19 May 2026)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:25.333Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-month-ahead-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -239,12 +239,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 4 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision framed against April–May 2026 Riksdag calendar</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>30 days (pre-summer recess) · 90 days (pre-election) · post-2026-09-13 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Author</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent, James Pether Sörling editorial responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 Rules 0–8 + DIW v1.0 + Bayesian scenario priors</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream ingested</strong></td><td>2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 sibling daily analyses (evening-analysis, realtime-*, week-ahead, weekly-review)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>With 147 days until the 13 September 2026 general election, the Swedish Riksdag enters its most legislatively compressed 30-day window of the 2025/26 term.</strong> PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> is delivering a <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> — Vårproposition <code>HD03100</code> + Vårändringsbudget <code>HD0399</code> + Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code> (82-öre fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief) — into a macro backdrop of <strong>0.82 % 2024 GDP growth</strong> (Nordic-bottom vs Denmark 3.48 %, Norway 2.10 %, Finland 0.42 %; World Bank) and <strong>8.69 % 2025 unemployment</strong> (the Nordic-highest since 2021). <strong>Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong> advances the <strong>Ukraine accountability architecture</strong> (<code>HD03231</code> Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression + <code>HD03232</code> Reparations Commission) — the first aggression-crime tribunal since Nuremberg, with Sweden as founding member. <strong>Justice / Migration ministers</strong> table a coordinated <strong>Migration + Criminal-Justice Blitz</strong>: new reception law (<code>HD03229</code>), stricter deportation rules (<code>HD03235</code>), inhibition orders (<code>HD01SfU22</code>), juvenile tightening (<code>HD03246</code>), and paid police training (<code>HD03237</code>) — met by <strong>7+ coordinated V/MP/C/S counter-motions</strong> structured as an ECHR-litigation predicate. <strong>Konstitutionsutskottet</strong> advances two <em>vilande</em> grundlag amendments (<code>HD01KU32</code> accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> digital-evidence search/seizure) — their <strong>2nd reading is embedded in the post-Sep-2026 Riksdag</strong>, making the September election a de-facto referendum on press-freedom transparency. <strong>HD01UFöU3</strong> (NATO Finland eFP, 1,200 Swedish troops) is imminent for chamber vote (<strong>week of 2026-04-20 → 24</strong>) — Sweden's first operational NATO output. The cluster reveals a <strong>pre-election maximalist agenda</strong> across fiscal stimulus, migration closure, foreign-policy norm entrepreneurship, and constitutional restructuring. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>D1</strong></td><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong> for the 19-Apr → 19-May news cycle</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Top-20 Ranking — Spring Fiscal Trilogy composite 98/96/95 ⇒ lead; Migration blitz ranks 94/93 ⇒ co-prominent; Ukraine tribunal 90/89 ⇒ foreign-policy lead</td><td align="right"><strong>Immediate</strong> (daily throughout horizon)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D2</strong></td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO + foreign-policy commentariat engagement posture</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 + R6 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T1 + T2 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §C2</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33 (Q2 2026)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D3</strong></td><td><strong>Coalition-stability + ECHR-litigation threat monitoring</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> T1 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R1/R5/R6 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §Wildcards W2</td><td align="right">Continuous; heightened post-2026-05-01</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-editors-need-in-60-seconds">📐 What Editors Need in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-editors-need-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-editors-need-in-60-seconds">📐 What Editors Need in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-editors-need-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>The economic-stewardship story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy.</strong> Sweden's 0.82 % GDP growth (lowest in Nordics) + 8.69 % unemployment is the <strong>single largest empirical vulnerability</strong> in the Tidö-coalition economic narrative. Fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief is fiscally significant (≈ SEK 40–60 B net stimulus estimate) and politically targeted at rural/car-dependent voters who align with SD base. Nordic benchmark: Denmark + Norway retain carbon-pricing discipline; Sweden's fuel-tax cut is a <strong>Nordic outlier</strong>. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-editors-need-in-60-seconds">📐 What Editors Need in 60 Second
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (April–May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (April–May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch-aprilmay-2026">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (Apr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter This Month</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong></td><td>Statsminister (M)</td><td>Owns the Spring Fiscal Trilogy narrative; KU32/KU33 grundlag change will be a campaign pillar</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong></td><td>Finansminister (M)</td><td>Defends fuel-tax cut fiscal arithmetic; must respond to Nordic-GDP gap critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td>Utrikesminister (M)</td><td>Tables Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission; will respond to US tribunal-cooperation uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong></td><td>Justitieminister (M)</td><td>Owns migration + criminal-justice blitz; ECHR-litigation exposure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong></td><td>Arbetsmarknads- och integrationsminister (L)</td><td>L identity strain on migration trio; unemployment narrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson</strong></td><td>Jämställdhets- och biträdande arbetsmarknadsminister (L)</td><td>Women's-shelter closure interpellation (<code>HD10438</code>); national strategy against violence against women (<code>HD03245</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jakob Forssmed</strong></td><td>Socialminister (KD)</td><td>Hate-speech / mosques interpellation (<code>HD10430</code>); KD internal strain on fuel-tax climate dimension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong></td><td>S partiledare</td><td>Systematic counter-motion architecture — alternative-government manifesto signals</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong></td><td>V partiledare</td><td>Most aggressive blocking strategy; ECHR-litigation architect; 4 %-threshold sensitivity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Märta Stenevi</strong></td><td>MP partiledare</td><td>Climate critique of fuel-tax cut; ECHR-migration coordination with V</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong></td><td>C partiledare</td><td>Swing-position — supports some gov't energy/housing bills, opposes deportation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong></td><td>SD partiledare</td><td>Kingmaker on migration + fuel-tax; JuU15 145–142 signature holder</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU ordförande (M-led)</strong></td><td>KU committee chair</td><td>Carries vilande grundlag vote schedule</td></tr><tr><td><strong>FiU ordförande</strong></td><td>FiU committee chair</td><td>Controls pace of HD03100/HD0399/HD03236 committee reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SfU ordförande</strong></td><td>SfU committee chair</td><td>Schedules hearings on HD03229/HD03235</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority">📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Priority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority">📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Priority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--30-day-vote-calendar-p1-priority">📅 30-Day Vote Calendar (P1 Prio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Vote</th><th>Committee</th><th>Expected Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td><code>HD03236</code> Extra ändringsbudget (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>FiU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes (bloc vote 145–142 signature); V+MP+S counter-motions rejected</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-20 → 24</strong></td><td><code>HD01UFöU3</code> NATO Finland eFP (1,200 troops)</td><td>UFöU → Kammaren</td><td>Broad majority ≈ 300+ MPs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late April 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU32</code> first-reading vilande (accessibility grundlag)</td><td>KU → Kammaren</td><td>Near-unanimous support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late April 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU33</code> first-reading vilande (digital-evidence)</td><td>KU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes; opposition concerns recorded</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03237</code> Paid police training</td><td>JuU → Kammaren</td><td>Broad majority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early–mid May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03229</code> Reception law + <code>HD03235</code> Deportation rules</td><td>SfU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes on Tidö majority; 145–142 signature likely; ECHR-litigation predicate established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mid–late May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03231</code> + <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal + reparations</td><td>UU → Kammaren</td><td>Cross-party consensus ≈ 349 MPs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late May 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> Spring Economic Proposition + Supplementary</td><td>FiU → Kammaren</td><td>Government passes; FiU-hearing-driven amendments possible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03240</code> Electricity system laws + <code>HD03239</code> Wind-power revenue sharing</td><td>NU → Kammaren</td><td>Broad support with MP-V climate critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td><td><code>HD03246</code> Juvenile tightening</td><td>JuU → Kammaren</td><td>Tidö majority likely ≈ 145–142</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-lens-condensed">🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-lens-condensed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-lens-condensed">🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-lens-condensed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-lens-condensed">🗳️ Election 2026 Lens (Condens
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Specific Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Campaign assets (government)</strong></td><td>Fiscal trilogy ("ekonomin tryggare") · Migration blitz ("brotten färre, gränsen starkare") · Ukraine tribunal ("Sverige försvarar rätten") · NATO eFP ("säkerheten först")</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign vulnerabilities (government)</strong></td><td>Nordic GDP gap (Sweden 0.82 % vs DK 3.5 %) · Fuel-tax cut vs climate (L + KD strain) · 8.69 % unemployment · Potential ECHR strike-down on migration trio · KU33 press-freedom critique abroad</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition scenarios</strong></td><td>S1 Continuity (P ≈ 0.50) · S2 Opposition success (S-led minority, P ≈ 0.35) · S3 S+V+MP majority (P ≈ 0.15) — full detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy legacy</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax cut = 1-year cyclical · KU32/KU33 = <strong>decadal grundlag change</strong> (only reversible by another grundlag change ⇒ 2 elections) · HD03231 = <strong>10–25 yr tribunal commitment</strong> · HD01UFöU3 = doctrinal NATO precedent · Migration trio = law-book legacy but ECHR-strike-down-sensitive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter salience</strong></td><td>Cost-of-living > brott + ordning > försvar/Ukraina > klimat > migration > grundlag (unless a chilling-effect case breaks pre-Sep)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-for-the-month">⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-5-risks-for-the-month"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-for-the-month">⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-for-the-month"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R2 — Economic credibility under Riksbank/NIER scrutiny</strong> (L×I = 12): Spring budget expansion while unemployment rises; <code>[VERY HIGH]</code> confidence on macro baseline</li>
 <li><strong>R6 — Reception-law post-enactment ECHR challenge</strong> (L×I = 12): V/C/MP-prepared litigation predicate; Article 3/8 ECHR plausible</li>
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-for-the-month">⚠️ Top-5 Risks for the Month<a cla
 </ol>
 <p>Full treatment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> §Risk Matrix + 30/60/90-day trigger calendar.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter (Monthly Forecast)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter (Monthly Forecast)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter-monthly-forecast">🎯 Analyst Confidence M
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>30-day legislative calendar (P1 vote order)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Committee reports already issued or scheduled</td></tr><tr><td>Vote-outcome projection on Tidö majority bills</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>JuU15 145–142 signature validated 2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 2nd-reading prospects (post-Sep Riksdag)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Entirely conditional on Sep 2026 election outcome</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 macro-data effect on government narrative</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>SCB baseline weak; direction directional</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR migration strike-down timing</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US cooperation on Ukraine tribunal</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Public US statements ambiguous through H1 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid response to NATO eFP</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP deployment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-artefacts-full-package">📎 Related Artefacts (full package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-artefacts-full-package"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-artefacts-full-package">📎 Related Artefacts (full package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-artefacts-full-package"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier-A</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · this Executive Brief
 <strong>Tier-B</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-Reference Map</a>
 <strong>Tier-C</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md">Scenario Analysis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md">Comparative International</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a>
@@ -565,18 +565,18 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-artefacts-full-package">📎 Related Artefacts (full package
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 (weekly) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:30:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (based on 20+ confirmed legislative documents)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The Swedish Riksdag enters a pivotal legislative sprint in late April–May 2026, with the <strong>2026 Spring Economic Proposition (HD03100)</strong> and supplementary budgets dominating Finance Committee work, while a multi-bill <strong>Ukraine solidarity cluster</strong> (three interrelated propositions) moves toward plenary votes. A parallel <strong>migration and justice legislative blitz</strong> — encompassing the new reception law, stricter deportation rules, and juvenile justice reform — faces intense opposition from V, MP, C, and S, signalling some of the most contentious votes of the current parliamentary session. With the September 2026 election horizon now dominating political calculations, every vote carries double weight as both governance and campaign positioning.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden's economic backdrop is challenging</strong>: GDP growth of 0.82% in 2024 trails all Nordic peers (Denmark 3.48%, Norway 2.10%, Finland 0.42%), unemployment has climbed to 8.69% in 2025, and the spring budget offers modest relief via fuel tax cuts and energy support targeted at price-sensitive households — but critics argue the measures are pre-election optics rather than structural reform.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026">Key Legislative Milestones (Apr 19 – May 19, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026">Key Legislative Milestones (Apr 19 – May 19, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -703,14 +703,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-legislative-milestones-apr-19--may-19-2026">Key Legislative Miles
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Priority</th><th>Document</th><th>Committee</th><th>Status</th><th>Estimated Vote</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🔴CRITICAL</td><td>HD03100 – Spring Economic Proposition 2026</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-13</td><td>Late May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🔴CRITICAL</td><td>HD0399 – Spring Supplementary Budget</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-13</td><td>Late May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🔴CRITICAL</td><td>HD03236 – Extra Budget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Support</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-13</td><td>Late April 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03220 / HD01UFöU3 – NATO Finland Deployment</td><td>UFöU</td><td>Committee report issued</td><td>Imminent vote</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03231 – Ukraine Tribunal Membership</td><td>UU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03232 – Ukraine Compensation Commission</td><td>UU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03229 – New Reception Law (Asylum)</td><td>SfU</td><td>Multiple opposition motions</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟠HIGH</td><td>HD03235 – Stricter Deportation Rules</td><td>SfU</td><td>3 opposition motions (V, MP, C)</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03246 – Stricter Rules for Young Offenders</td><td>JuU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03237 – Paid Police Training</td><td>JuU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03240 – New Electricity System Laws</td><td>NU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03239 – Wind Power Revenue Sharing</td><td>NU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03238 – New Environmental Permitting Agency</td><td>MJU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟡MEDIUM</td><td>HD03244 – Public Sector Data Interoperability</td><td>FiU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟢LOW</td><td>HD03242 – Active Forestry Framework</td><td>MJU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🟢LOW</td><td>HD03245 – National Strategy: Violence Against Women</td><td>AU</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-14</td><td>June 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis">Thematic Clusters (Cross-Document Pattern Analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis">Thematic Clusters (Cross-Document Pattern Analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters-cross-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>1. Ukraine Solidarity Cluster</strong> [🟩HIGH confidence]: Three Ukraine-related propositions (HD03231, HD03232, HD03220) represent the largest single-day Ukraine legislative push Sweden has undertaken since the February 2022 invasion. The joint foreign affairs/defense committee (UFöU) has already issued its report on NATO Finland deployment. This cluster will likely pass with broad cross-party support.</p>
 <p><strong>2. Migration &#x26; Justice Blitz</strong> [🟩HIGH confidence]: Five interconnected bills (reception law HD03229, deportation rules HD03235, juvenile justice HD03246, police training HD03237, inhibition order HD01SfU22) form a coordinated pre-election law-and-order narrative. Opposition from S, V, MP, and C on key provisions signals intense committee debates and possible amendment votes.</p>
 <p><strong>3. Spring Budget Package</strong> [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]: The unprecedented triple-submission of HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236 on April 13 represents a carefully orchestrated pre-election economic package. The fuel tax cut and energy support (HD03236) is particularly significant as a direct household relief measure ahead of the election.</p>
 <p><strong>4. Energy Transition Cluster</strong> [🟧MEDIUM confidence]: Three energy bills (electricity system laws HD03240, wind power HD03239, workplace EV charging tax relief HD01SkU23) form an energy policy modernisation package. Cross-party tensions exist on wind power (local government vs. national energy security).</p>
 <p><strong>5. Digital Governance Cluster</strong> [🟧MEDIUM confidence]: State e-ID (HD01TU21) + data interoperability (HD03244) + cybersecurity centre (HD03214-related motion HD024093) form Sweden's digital governance agenda for 2026–2027.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers">Forward Watch Points (Specific Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers">Forward Watch Points (Specific Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>FiU committee report on HD03236 (Fuel Tax Cut)</strong>: Expected within 2 weeks. MP and V motions (HD024092, HD024098) to reject fuel tax cut pending. Vote likely late April / early May 2026. Outcome: Coalition expected to pass, opposition united against. <strong>Trigger</strong>: Committee report publication date.</p>
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch-points-specific-triggers">Forward Watch Points (Specifi
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: September 13, 2026 (expected)
 <strong>Days remaining</strong>: ~147 days</p>
 <p>The legislative agenda April–May 2026 is deeply shaped by election positioning:</p>
@@ -742,12 +742,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" ari
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Coalition stability indicator</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Tidö coalition has sufficient votes on all tracked bills. No defection risk identified through May 2026.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:35:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-scoring-legislative-items">Top-Scoring Legislative Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-scoring-legislative-items"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-scoring-legislative-items">Top-Scoring Legislative Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-scoring-legislative-items"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-scoring-legislative-items">Top-Scoring Legislative Items<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Score (0-100)</th><th>Election Relevance</th><th>Cross-Party Conflict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 Spring Economic Proposition</td><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td><strong>98</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Spring Supplementary Budget</td><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td><strong>96</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra Budget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Support</td><td>Fiscal/Energy/Climate</td><td><strong>95</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03229</td><td>New Reception Law (Asylum)</td><td>Migration</td><td><strong>94</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Stricter Deportation Rules</td><td>Justice/Migration</td><td><strong>93</strong></td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03220</td><td>Swedish Contribution to NATO Finland</td><td>Defence/Foreign</td><td><strong>92</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine Tribunal Membership</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td><strong>90</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Compensation Commission</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td><strong>89</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Paid Police Training</td><td>Justice/Security</td><td><strong>85</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Stricter Rules for Young Offenders</td><td>Justice</td><td><strong>83</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD03240</td><td>New Electricity System Laws</td><td>Energy</td><td><strong>82</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind Power Revenue Sharing</td><td>Energy/Climate</td><td><strong>80</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Public Sector Data Interoperability</td><td>Digital/Admin</td><td><strong>78</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD03238</td><td>New Environmental Permitting Agency</td><td>Environment</td><td><strong>77</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Accessibility in Fundamental Law</td><td>Constitutional</td><td><strong>76</strong></td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Digital Files from Search Seizure</td><td>Constitutional/Press</td><td><strong>75</strong></td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD03245</td><td>National Strategy: Violence Against Women</td><td>Social/Gender</td><td><strong>74</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>National Housing Register</td><td>Housing</td><td><strong>72</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition Orders for Deportation</td><td>Migration/Legal</td><td><strong>70</strong></td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Waste Legislation Reform</td><td>Environment/EU</td><td><strong>65</strong></td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>Scores are computed as a weighted composite:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Policy impact</strong> (30%): How many citizens/institutions affected and how deeply</li>
@@ -954,23 +954,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>Urgency/timeline</strong> (10%): How soon the vote is expected</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression">Key Insight: Pre-Election Legislative Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression">Key Insight: Pre-Election Legislative Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight-pre-election-legislative-compression"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2025/26 riksmöte is on track to be the most legislatively active session of the Tidö coalition's term. The concentration of high-significance bills in April–May 2026 (all 20 top-scoring items submitted between April 9–17, 2026) indicates deliberate legislative acceleration before the summer recess and September election. This is consistent with international patterns of incumbent governments front-loading their policy agenda in the final parliamentary session before an election.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:36:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-citizens--households">1. Citizens &#x26; Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--households"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--households">1. Citizens &#x26; Households<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--households"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary concern</strong>: Economic anxiety — unemployment at 8.69%, weak GDP growth (0.82% in 2024)
 <strong>Immediate benefit</strong>: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) reduces petrol/diesel costs directly; parental allowance simplification (HD01SfU20) reduces administrative burden
 <strong>Concern</strong>: Women's shelter closures (HD10438) reduce safety net; declining Stockholm housing construction (HD10434)
 <strong>Awareness level</strong>: HIGH for fuel tax cut (widely reported); LOW for most regulatory bills
 <strong>Likely response</strong>: Cautious welcome for price relief; continued concern over employment prospects</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>M (Moderaterna) — Ulf Kristersson</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Championing Ukraine solidarity cluster as foreign policy legacy</li>
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a
 <li>NATO/Ukraine cluster strongly supported</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc">3. Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc">3. Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna) — Magdalena Andersson</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Filed motions on reception law (HD024080), supplementary budget (HD024082), settlement law (HD024079)</li>
@@ -1027,31 +1027,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc">3. Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 <li>LGBTQ rights interpellation (HD10431) filed by C member</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Energy sector</strong>: Strongly welcomes new electricity system laws (HD03240) and permanent EV charging tax relief (HD01SkU23). Wind energy companies benefit from revenue-sharing law (HD03239) enabling faster municipal permit approval.</p>
 <p><strong>Financial/Banking sector</strong>: Consumer credit law (HD03223) and new harbour law (HD03234) create compliance obligations but also legal clarity.</p>
 <p><strong>Tech sector</strong>: Data interoperability requirements (HD03244) create new market for public sector integration services; state e-ID reduces authentication friction.</p>
 <p><strong>Forestry/Agriculture</strong>: New active forestry framework (HD03242) — industry cautiously positive but watching implementation details.</p>
 <p><strong>Shipping</strong>: New harbour law (HD03234) modernises regulatory framework.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Women's rights organisations</strong>: Deep concern about women's shelter closures (HD10438); cautiously positive on violence against women strategy (HD03245) but awaiting funding commitments.</p>
 <p><strong>Asylum/refugee support</strong>: Strongly opposing new reception law (HD03229) and deportation rules (HD03235); calling for parliamentary hearings with affected communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Environmental NGOs</strong>: Welcome waste legislation reform (HD01MJU19) and EU circular economy compliance; strongly oppose fuel tax cut (HD03236); cautious on new environmental permitting agency (HD03238) — fear reduced procedural protection.</p>
 <p><strong>LGBTQ organisations</strong>: HD10431 interpellation (C party) on LGBTQ rights internationally signals awareness; domestic legal framework stable.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>EU Commission</strong>: Monitoring Sweden's implementation of EU accessibility directive (basis for HD01KU32); will receive notification on fuel tax subsidy (state aid assessment).</p>
 <p><strong>NATO allies</strong>: Strongly supportive of NATO Finland deployment (HD03220); Ukraine tribunal and compensation commission (HD03231, HD03232) reinforce rule-of-law credentials.</p>
 <p><strong>Ukraine</strong>: Three solidarity bills represent significant political and legal support; compensation commission membership has direct material implications for Ukrainian reparations claims.</p>
 <p><strong>Nordic neighbours</strong>: Denmark, Norway, Finland all benefiting from stronger Swedish security posture; Finland directly affected by HD03220.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts">7. Judiciary/Constitutional Experts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts">7. Judiciary/Constitutional Experts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-experts"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional law community</strong>: Two "vilande" fundamental law changes (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) following correct procedure; concerns about HD01KU33 implications for press freedom and right to inspect public documents.</p>
 <p><strong>Administrative courts</strong>: New inhibition order system (HD01SfU22, entering force 2026-06-01) will create new case categories requiring judicial interpretation.</p>
 <p><strong>ECHR/Human rights lawyers</strong>: Deportation rules (HD03235) and new reception law (HD03229) will face scrutiny under Article 3 (prohibition of torture/inhuman treatment) and Article 8 (family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Major focus topics</strong> (predicted high coverage in April–May 2026):</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Spring budget and fuel tax cut (HD03236) — economic story of the month</li>
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Media sentiment</strong>: Split along existing political lines. State broadcaster SVT expected to give balanced coverage of budget debate; tabloids (Expressen, Aftonbladet) likely to focus on migration and crime legislation for high reader engagement.</p>
 <p><strong>Social media dynamics</strong>: Fuel tax cut and deportation rules expected to trend heavily. Ukraine solidarity likely positive sentiment across partisan lines.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SCN-ID</strong></td><td>SCN-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>30-day base (2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19) · 90-day extension (→ 2026-07-19) · post-Sep-election horizon (2026-Q4)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian priors + ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) + Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 continuity)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scenarios</strong></td><td>3 base + 2 wildcards + 1 black-swan</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands (30-day + post-election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election">🎯 Three Base Scenarios — Probability Bands (30-day + post-election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1189,10 +1189,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios--probability-bands-30-day--post-election">🎯
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Event</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>B1</strong></td><td>US withdraws or delays cooperation on Ukraine Special Tribunal (<code>HD03231</code>)</td><td>Reduces tribunal effectiveness; Sweden's norm-entrepreneurship claim softened; foreign-policy narrative loses one pillar</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>B2</strong></td><td>Major fuel-tax-cut EU state-aid challenge lands pre-Sep</td><td>Forces government to defend subsidy architecture at campaign peak</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (30-day P = 0.85 · post-Sep P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050">📊 S1 — Continuity Scenario (30-day P = 0.85 · post-Sep P = 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--continuity-scenario-30-day-p--085--post-sep-p--050"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidö working majority (M+KD+L + SD support) passes all five legislative clusters. The JuU15 145–142 signature holds on every cross-bloc vote. Spring fiscal trilogy executes; KU32 + KU33 first readings pass (vilande); Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission architecture passes with ≈ 349 MPs; NATO eFP deploys 1,200 troops to Finland by 2026-Q3. Post-Sep-2026 re-election confirms the coalition, and KU32/KU33 second readings ratify. Migration blitz enters the statute book.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon">Necessary Conditions (30-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon">Necessary Conditions (30-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-30-day-horizon">Necessary Conditions (30-day hor
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>FiU committee delivers HD03236 report on schedule</td><td>FiU committee calendar, 2026-04-21/22</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (~0.95)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>UFöU report on HD01UFöU3 produces majority chamber support</td><td>Already issued; plenary scheduling</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (~0.98)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SfU holds hearings on HD03229/HD03235 without blocking-coalition emergence</td><td>SfU committee schedule</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.88)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>UU delivers report on HD03231/HD03232 by mid-May</td><td>UU committee calendar</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.90)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>No major coalition internal fracture (L defection on migration, KD defection on fuel-tax)</td><td>Media tracking · interpellation log</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.82)</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Russian hybrid response contained (no major escalation event)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins · Nordic event log</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.75)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day">Indicators to Monitor (30-day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day">Indicators to Monitor (30-day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2026-04-21</strong> FiU committee report on HD03236 (trigger: publication)</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-22</strong> Kammarvote on HD03236 (trigger: chamber protocol)</li>
@@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-indicators-to-monitor-30-day">Indicators to Monitor (30-day)<a class=
 <li><strong>2026-05-28</strong> SCB labour-force survey release (trigger: data release)</li>
 <li><strong>2026-06-03</strong> KI Konjunkturinstitutet baseline update (trigger: publication)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-policy--narrative">Implications (policy + narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-policy--narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-policy--narrative">Implications (policy + narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-policy--narrative"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Fiscal trilogy delivers; government gains pre-election narrative of delivery</li>
 <li>✅ Ukraine tribunal architecture operationalises; norm-entrepreneurship campaign asset</li>
@@ -1263,10 +1263,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-policy--narrative">Implications (policy + narrative)<a c
 <li>⚠️ Q1 2026 macro data (SCB 2026-05-28) decisive for economic-stewardship narrative</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (post-Sep P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035">📊 S2 — Opposition Success Scenario (post-Sep P = 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--opposition-success-scenario-post-sep-p--035"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-1">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-1"></a></h4>
 <p>September 2026 produces an S-led minority government, with V/MP/C occasional cooperation. KU33 second reading <strong>fails</strong> or is rewritten. Vårpropositionens fiscal arithmetic re-opened in the 2026/27 Riksmöte. Migration trio retained but substantively reformed (SfU22 inhibition tightened; reception-law procedural protections restored). Ukraine + NATO + KU32 retained intact (cross-party consensus).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1309,9 +1309,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>S polling above M+KD+L combined by late Aug 2026</td><td>SCB/Sifo/Novus/Ipsos trackers</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.50)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Cost-of-living remains top-salience issue (not migration or Ukraine)</td><td>Sifo/Novus salience trackers</td><td align="center">🟩 H (~0.70)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>At least one major coalition fracture event (L identity crisis on migration; KD climate defection)</td><td>Media tracking · interpellation log</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.45)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>No Russian hybrid escalation shifting voter focus to security</td><td>SÄPO bulletins</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.65)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>MP + V clear the 4 % threshold (so S+V+MP coalition feasible)</td><td>Sifo monthly</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.55)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal">30-day manifestation (minimal)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal">30-day manifestation (minimal)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation-minimal"></a></h4>
 <p>In the 30-day window, S2 is pre-manifesting via <strong>counter-motion architecture</strong> rather than vote outcomes. Every government bill in April–May is paired with a systematic S/V/MP/C counter-motion (19 counter-motions tracked in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §Counter-Motion Network). These serve as <strong>alternative-government manifesto documents</strong> for the September campaign. The 30-day indicator is: <strong>Is opposition counter-motion content reported by legacy media as an "alternative government program" or dismissed as procedural?</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ V/C/MP ECHR-litigation-predicate fully matured; Strasbourg docket H2 2026</li>
 <li>✅ Policy legacy preserved where cross-party consensus existed (Ukraine, NATO, KU32 accessibility)</li>
@@ -1320,10 +1320,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>⚠️ Migration-trio reform tested against SD-base backlash for successor government</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority (post-Sep P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015">📊 S3 — Coalition Collapse / S+V+MP Majority (post-Sep P = 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-collapse--svmp-majority-post-sep-p--015"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-2">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-2"></a></h4>
 <p>September 2026 produces an S+V+MP majority. KU33 2nd reading <strong>blocked</strong>. Fiscal arithmetic <strong>fully renegotiated</strong> (progressive-tax reforms plausible). Migration trio substantially <strong>revised or repealed</strong> (reception law reopened; inhibition orders repealed). NATO + Ukraine retained as cross-party. Climate reform accelerates (fuel-tax cut reversed).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-necessary-conditions-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1360,26 +1360,26 @@ <h3 id="rm-necessary-conditions-1">Necessary Conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Condition</th><th>Required Indicator</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>S + V + MP combined > 175 seats in Sep 2026</td><td>Sifo final trackers</td><td align="center">🟥 L (~0.20)</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>V above 6 % threshold (rising base); MP above 5 %</td><td>Monthly trackers</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.45)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Coalition rhetorical collapse pre-Sep (L pulls out or KD rhetorical break)</td><td>Media events</td><td align="center">🟥 L (~0.25)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Economic narrative remains decisive (no Russian hybrid or other security event)</td><td>Continuous</td><td align="center">🟧 M (~0.60)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-manifestation">30-day manifestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-manifestation">30-day manifestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-manifestation"></a></h4>
 <p>Minimal direct effect in 30 days. Indirect: <strong>V-block fuel-tax motion (HD024092) and MP-block (HD024098) establish the 2026 campaign's climate-reversal narrative</strong>. If these counter-motions are accepted for committee referral (even if defeated), the narrative architecture is set.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Climate reform accelerates; KU33 reversal; full migration-trio redesign</li>
 <li>⚠️ Unprecedented rapid policy reversals create regulatory uncertainty</li>
 <li>⚠️ Credibility cost with EU + NATO allies on fiscal discipline</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising">📊 Wildcard W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation (P = 0.22, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-3">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising">📊 Wildcard W1 — Russian Hybrid Escalation (P = 0.22, rising)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-escalation-p--022-rising"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-3">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-3"></a></h4>
 <p>A Russian hybrid-warfare event (cyber-attack on Swedish critical infrastructure, airspace incursion, undersea-cable sabotage, election-interference campaign, or kinetic escalation in Baltic region) shifts campaign agenda from cost-of-living to security.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-indicators">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-indicators">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>SÄPO elevation of threat level (continuous monitoring)</li>
 <li>Nordic event log (Baltic/Finnish incidents)</li>
 <li>Undersea-cable incident reports (Baltic)</li>
 <li>Cybersäkerhetscentrum alert bulletins</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1404,16 +1404,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Base scenario</th><th align="center">Adjusted P if W1 realised</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 Continuity</td><td align="center"><strong>+7 pp → ~0.57 (post-Sep)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>S2 Opposition success</td><td align="center">−4 pp → ~0.31</td></tr><tr><td>S3 S+V+MP majority</td><td align="center"><strong>−3 pp → ~0.12</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Narrative shift</strong>: NATO eFP and Ukraine tribunal become campaign centrepieces; migration + fiscal fall in salience; SD-government hardens; coalition-internal strain reduced.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012">📊 Wildcard W2 — ECHR Strike-Down on Inhibition Orders Pre-Sep (P = 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-description-4">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-4"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012">📊 Wildcard W2 — ECHR Strike-Down on Inhibition Orders Pre-Sep (P = 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w2--echr-strike-down-on-inhibition-orders-pre-sep-p--012"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-description-4">Description<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-description-4"></a></h4>
 <p>A lightning ECHR docket (V/C/MP-prepared) produces a ruling on inhibition orders (<code>HD01SfU22</code>) before Sep 2026, finding Article 3 or Article 8 ECHR violation. Government forced to amend mid-campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-indicators-1">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-indicators-1">Trigger Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-indicators-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Strasbourg docket monitoring (V parlamentariska kansli)</li>
 <li>Interim-measures request filings (plausible early 2026-Q3)</li>
 <li>ECHR press-release calendar</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Base scenario</th><th align="center">Adjusted P if W2 realised</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 Continuity</td><td align="center"><strong>−8 pp → ~0.42 (post-Sep)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>S2 Opposition success</td><td align="center"><strong>+7 pp → ~0.42</strong></td></tr><tr><td>S3 S+V+MP majority</td><td align="center">+1 pp → ~0.16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Narrative shift</strong>: Government legal-credibility cost; "rule of law" narrative weaponised against migration blitz; fuel-tax-cut pairing amplified as "law-of-convenience" critique.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only">🔬 ACH Grid — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (30-day resolution only)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only">🔬 ACH Grid — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (30-day resolution only)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1501,7 +1501,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach-grid--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-30-day-resolution-only">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Supports S1</th><th align="center">Supports S2/S3</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU committee calendar on track</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>Strong S1 signal</td></tr><tr><td>JuU15 145–142 signature validated 2026-04-16</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>Pure bloc discipline → S1</td></tr><tr><td>19 coordinated opposition counter-motions filed</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Opposition architecture maturing → S2/S3 base-rate</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish 2024 GDP 0.82 % (lowest Nordic)</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Economic-vulnerability argument → S2</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition internal silence on fuel-tax climate tension (no L defection yet)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>S1 holding</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal cross-party consensus ≈ 349 MPs</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Neutral (consensus cuts across bloc)</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid baseline (no escalation event in 30-day horizon)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>S1 path preserved</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR docket pace slow for inhibition orders</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⬛</td><td>W2 held in abeyance → S1 path</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>ACH conclusion</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: In the 30-day horizon, S1 continuity is dominant (P ≈ 0.85). S2/S3 crystallise via post-Sep dynamics, not April–May votes. The 30-day window's strategic function is <strong>manifesto architecture</strong> (S2/S3 counter-motions) rather than vote outcomes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping">📅 90-Day Monitoring Calendar (trigger → scenario-shift mapping)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping">📅 90-Day Monitoring Calendar (trigger → scenario-shift mapping)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--90-day-monitoring-calendar-trigger--scenario-shift-mapping">📅 90-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Scenario-Shift Potential</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>HD03236 chamber vote</td><td>Confirms S1 if passes on 145–142 bloc signature</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-24</td><td>HD01UFöU3 chamber vote</td><td>Confirms S1; strengthens narrative on NATO integration</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-30</td><td>KU first-reading KU32/KU33</td><td>Embeds 2nd-reading decision in Sep 2026 result</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-15</td><td>SfU report on HD03229/HD03235</td><td>Opposition's counter-motion architecture published</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-20</td><td>Chamber votes on migration blitz</td><td>145–142 signature tested; shift to S1 if holds</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-05-28</strong></td><td><strong>SCB Q1 labour-force survey</strong></td><td><strong>Most decisive pre-summer macro datapoint</strong> — directional for S1 vs S2</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-03</td><td>KI baseline economic update</td><td>Confirms/disconfirms macro trajectory</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Summer-recess begins</td><td>Last pre-campaign chamber activity</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-01</td><td>KI medium-term prognosis</td><td>Election-season baseline established</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-13</td><td>Opinion-poll campaign window opens</td><td>Crystallisation of S1/S2/S3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-13</strong></td><td><strong>General election</strong></td><td>Definitive resolution</td></tr><tr><td>2026-10-01</td><td>Post-election Riksdag convenes</td><td>KU33 2nd-reading prospects determined</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🎯 Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>30-day P bands (S1 dominant)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Derived from upstream weekly-review + committee schedules</td></tr><tr><td>Post-Sep P bands</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Conditional on macro Q3 data + opposition-manifesto reception</td></tr><tr><td>W1 rising baseline (Russian hybrid)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td>Post-eFP deployment increases incentive</td></tr><tr><td>W2 ECHR docket pace</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Strasbourg timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>ACH 30-day resolution</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td>Evidence asymmetry clear</td></tr><tr><td>Counter-motion → manifesto translation success</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Media framing contingent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">📎 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">📎 Cross-Reference to Upstream Scenario Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — canonical 90-day + post-election scenario baseline (adopted here, extended to 30-day band)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/week-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>2026-04-17/week-ahead/synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — week-16 forward indicators (now operationalised as 30-day triggers)</li>
@@ -1626,12 +1626,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-scenario-work">📎 Cross-Reference to U
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 (weekly) or on any W1/W2 trigger · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Scenario Analysis + Bayesian priors + ACH.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:33:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep (≥4 risks with numeric L×I scores required)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact">Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact">Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1720,21 +1720,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix-likelihood--impact">Risk Matrix (Likelihood × Impact)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Category</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>SfU committee blocks or significantly amends deportation rules (HD03235) under opposition pressure</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Legislative/Political</td><td>V+MP+C forming blocking coalition in committee</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>Spring budget (HD03100) triggers Riksbank credibility debate — high unemployment + deficit spending</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Economic/Fiscal</td><td>Riksbank or NIER economic assessment</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>NATO Finland deployment vote (HD01UFöU3) delayed by procedural challenge</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>Security/International</td><td>Opposition procedural motion</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Fuel tax cut (HD03236) generates EU state aid scrutiny</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>EU/Legal</td><td>European Commission notification</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>Coalition tension on climate — energy support contradicts green commitments</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Coalition/Reputational</td><td>L or KD public dissent on fuel subsidy</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>New reception law (HD03229) faces constitutional court challenge post-enactment</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Legal/Constitutional</td><td>Legal challenge filed by NGO or municipality</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Unemployment climbs further above 8.69% — undermines government's economic narrative</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Economic</td><td>SCB/Statistics Sweden monthly labour data</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Women's shelter closure crisis escalates — interpellation becomes media crisis</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Reputational/Social</td><td>More shelter closures reported in May 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-risk-analysis">Detailed Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high">R2/R6/R7: Economic Risk Cluster (Combined L×I: High)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-risk-analysis">Detailed Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high">R2/R6/R7: Economic Risk Cluster (Combined L×I: High)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2r6r7-economic-risk-cluster-combined-li-high"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth of 0.82% in 2024 — lagging Denmark (3.48%), Norway (2.10%), Finland (0.42%) — combined with rising unemployment to 8.69% in 2025 creates a fragile economic backdrop for the spring budget season. The government's fiscal stimulus via fuel tax cuts and energy support is expansionary at a time when fiscal consolidation may be more prudent. The Riksbank's assessment of the spring economic proposition will be the key inflection point.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Konjunkturinstitutet economic tendency survey (May) — if confidence falls, amplifies economic risk score.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Government's explicit fiscal framework review (HD03241 — Riksrevisionen report on financial policy framework) provides parliamentary oversight mechanism.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension">R5: Climate Coalition Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension">R5: Climate Coalition Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-climate-coalition-tension"></a></h4>
 <p>The fuel tax cut (HD03236) explicitly lowers taxes on petrol and diesel — a direct contradiction of L (Liberals) and KD's stated climate positions. Interpellation responses and Alliansen party statements in May will reveal the degree of internal tension. SD's voter base strongly supports lower fuel taxes; this is fundamentally a SD electoral concession within the coalition.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: L party conference statements in May; environmental organisations' response.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Simultaneous passage of EV charging tax relief (HD01SkU23) and wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) provides rhetorical balance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r8-social-services-deterioration">R8: Social Services Deterioration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8-social-services-deterioration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r8-social-services-deterioration">R8: Social Services Deterioration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r8-social-services-deterioration"></a></h4>
 <p>Women's shelter closures (interpellation HD10438 by Sofia Amloh/S to Minister Nina Larsson/L) signal a systemic underfunding of violence prevention infrastructure. If additional closures are reported during May, this could escalate into a multi-day media event with cross-party condemnation.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Riksorganisationen för kvinnojourer och tjejjourer i Sverige (ROKS) membership survey results.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: National strategy against violence against women (HD03245 skrivelse) provides a policy response framework but no immediate funding commitment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap-summary">Risk Heatmap Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heatmap-summary">Risk Heatmap Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>Impact ↑
   5 |  R3
   4 |      R1  R2  R6  R7
@@ -1747,15 +1747,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap-summary">Risk Heatmap Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Highest priority</strong>: R2 (economic credibility), R6 (reception law legal risk), R7 (unemployment trajectory)
 <strong>Most urgent</strong>: R1 (deportation rules — vote imminent), R3 (NATO Finland — imminent vote)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Overall risk confidence: 🟩HIGH — All risks grounded in specific legislative documents and observable economic data. Economic indicators are from World Bank (2024–2025 data). Legislative timeline risks based on committee report dates and known parliamentary procedure.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:32:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep (8 stakeholder groups required)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Government delivers historic Ukraine solidarity package — 3 interlinked propositions on tribunal, compensation commission, and NATO Finland deployment submitted in single week</td><td>HD03231, HD03232, HD03220</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Spring Economic Proposition + 2 supplementary budgets submitted simultaneously, showing coordinated fiscal planning</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Fuel tax cut and energy support demonstrate direct household relief capacity before election</td><td>HD03236</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Paid police training (HD03237) addresses chronic recruitment problem with structural solution</td><td>HD03237</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Constitutional law committee (KU) advancing two fundamental law modernisations simultaneously</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>S6</td><td>Wind power revenue-sharing law (HD03239) creates new financial incentive model for municipal acceptance</td><td>HD03239</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>S7</td><td>National housing register (HD01CU28) improves property market transparency and crime prevention</td><td>HD01CU28, HD01CU27</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>Sweden GDP growth 2024 only 0.82%, significantly lagging Denmark (3.48%) and Norway (2.10%)</td><td>World Bank data</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Unemployment risen to 8.69% in 2025, highest among Nordic peers, eroding government's economic credibility</td><td>World Bank data</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>Fuel tax cut (HD03236) contradicts climate commitments — MP motion HD024098, V motion HD024092 cite contradiction with net-zero targets</td><td>HD024098, HD024092</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Multiple coalition bills face strong opposition motions, indicating contested electoral legitimacy</td><td>HD024079-HD024097 (19 counter-motions)</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>Women's shelter closures (interpellation HD10438) expose gap between government rhetoric and social services funding</td><td>HD10438</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>W6</td><td>Housing construction declining in Stockholm region — 11,091 units planned for 2026 vs. higher demand</td><td>HD10434</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>W7</td><td>New environmental permitting agency (HD03238) adds institutional complexity in the short term</td><td>HD03238</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Spring budget package creates pre-election economic narrative — government can campaign on delivered fiscal relief</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-13</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Ukraine legislative cluster enhances Sweden's international standing as a NATO ally and rule-of-law advocate</td><td>HD03231, HD03232, HD03220</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>New electricity system laws (HD03240) provide regulatory certainty for energy investment</td><td>HD03240</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Data interoperability requirements (HD03244) position Sweden as digital governance leader in EU context</td><td>HD03244</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>O5</td><td>State e-ID (HD01TU21) reduces fraud and enables digital public services</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td>O6</td><td>Waste legislation reform (HD01MJU19) improves circular economy compliance with EU targets</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2019,75 +2019,75 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Opposition unity on migration/reception law (V+MP+C+S all filing counter-motions) risks making HD03229 the most contested vote of the session</td><td>HD024079-HD024089</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>Deportation rules (HD03235) face constitutional challenge risk — C motion (HD024095) seeks significant amendment</td><td>HD024090, HD024095, HD024097</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Tax system review pressure (interpellation HD10433) signals post-election risk of fundamental fiscal restructuring</td><td>HD10433</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>EU wage transparency directive (interpellation HD10437) creates compliance obligation that may require further legislation</td><td>HD10437</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td>Defence infrastructure cost burden (interpellation HD10425) signals fiscal stress from NATO expansion obligations</td><td>HD10425</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>2026-03-31</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups">Stakeholder Analysis (8 Mandatory Groups)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-high-confidence">1. Citizens [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups">Stakeholder Analysis (8 Mandatory Groups)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis-8-mandatory-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-high-confidence">1. Citizens [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) provides immediate household relief — petrol and diesel prices affected directly; parental allowance reform (HD01SfU20) removes bureaucratic burden for parents; housing register (HD01CU28) improves property transparency.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Unemployment at 8.69% creates economic anxiety; declining housing construction in Stockholm limits affordability; women's shelter closures (HD10438) reduce safety net for vulnerable women.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Mixed — pre-election economic measures provide visible short-term relief while structural employment and housing problems persist.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L) [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L) [🟦VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl-very-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Massive legislative delivery package demonstrates governing capacity; Ukraine cluster strengthens international credentials; law-and-order narrative via migration/justice bills consolidates core SD voter base.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Fuel tax cut creates climate credibility gap; unemployment rise undercuts economic management narrative; inter-coalition tensions between KD social policy and SD migration positions possible.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Strong position entering campaign season but vulnerable on economic competence.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP+C) [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence">3. Opposition Bloc (S+V+MP+C) [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: 19 counter-motions filed create clear policy differentiation for election campaigns; S can position as responsible alternative government; C occupies swing position on multiple bills.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Opposition lacks votes to block any coalition bill; risk of being seen as obstructionist rather than constructive; V and MP face marginal parliamentary existence risk.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Counter-motions are primarily electoral positioning documents — they will not change outcomes but build manifesto differentiation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence">4. Business &#x26; Industry [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence">4. Business &#x26; Industry [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: New electricity system laws (HD03240) provide investment certainty; state e-ID reduces administrative burden; data interoperability (HD03244) reduces public sector data friction; paid police training (HD03237) increases security.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Forestry industry concerns about new regulations (HD03242); shipping industry affected by harbour law (HD03234); construction sector faces ongoing housing demand/supply mismatch.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Net positive from regulatory modernisation and energy security framework.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence">5. Civil Society [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence">5. Civil Society [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: National strategy against violence against women (HD03245) represents significant policy commitment; accessibility improvements in fundamental law (HD01KU32) benefit persons with disabilities.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Women's shelter closures (HD10438) signal funding gaps in violence prevention infrastructure; civil society asylum support organisations affected by new reception law (HD03229).
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Concerned — policy commitments not matched by service funding.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence">6. International/EU [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence">6. International/EU [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Three Ukraine solidarity bills significantly strengthen Sweden's international standing post-NATO accession; EU accessibility requirements compliance improved (HD01KU32); EU waste legislation compliance improved (HD01MJU19).
 <strong>Risks</strong>: EU wage transparency directive (HD10437) creates compliance pressure; weapons export rules debate (HD024091, HD024096) could affect EU/NATO arms coordination.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Sweden's international posture strengthened substantially by Ukraine legislative cluster.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence">7. Judiciary/Constitutional [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence">7. Judiciary/Constitutional [🟧MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Two fundamental law changes being adopted as "vilande" (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) — proper constitutional procedure followed; identity requirements for property registration (HD01CU27) strengthen anti-money-laundering framework.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Deportation rules (HD03235) face legal scrutiny on proportionality; inhibition order law (HD01SfU22) tested against ECHR standards; freedom of speech protections under scrutiny (HD10429).
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Constitutional procedure is sound; specific bills face potential future legal challenge.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence">8. Media/Public Opinion [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence">8. Media/Public Opinion [🟩HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Benefits</strong>: Fuel tax cut generates positive headline coverage; Ukraine solidarity cluster creates positive international media narrative; police training reform is popular.
 <strong>Risks</strong>: Unemployment at 8.69% is the overriding economic story; women's shelter closures generate negative human interest coverage; migration debate is polarising.
 <strong>Net assessment</strong>: Media environment is contested — government has positive stories but negative economic indicators dominate.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:34:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level-medium">Overall Threat Level: MEDIUM<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-medium"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-level-medium">Overall Threat Level: MEDIUM<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-medium"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliamentary system is functioning within normal democratic parameters. The threat landscape is dominated by <strong>political polarisation</strong> around migration policy and <strong>economic vulnerabilities</strong> ahead of the September 2026 election, rather than acute institutional threats.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-identification">Threat Identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-identification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy">T1: Democratic Legitimacy Strain on Migration Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-identification">Threat Identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-identification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy">T1: Democratic Legitimacy Strain on Migration Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1-democratic-legitimacy-strain-on-migration-policy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟠MEDIUM-HIGH
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p>The simultaneous introduction of the new reception law (HD03229), stricter deportation rules (HD03235), and inhibition orders (HD01SfU22) creates a trifecta of migration tightening that has generated the most intensive parliamentary opposition of the 2025/26 session. With 19 counter-motions filed by S, V, MP, and C parties, and civil society organisations raising human rights concerns, the risk is that democratic legitimacy of these laws is contested post-enactment.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024079 (S), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C), HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP) — 7 motions against HD03229 and HD03235 alone.
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Administrative court challenges to individual deportation decisions under new rules.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk">T2: Constitutional Creep Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk">T2: Constitutional Creep Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2-constitutional-creep-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟡MEDIUM
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p>Two bills are being simultaneously adopted as "vilande" fundamental law changes (HD01KU32 accessibility in media, HD01KU33 documents obtained by search and seizure). While the procedure is constitutionally sound, the substance of HD01KU33 — removing seized digital files from public records — raises press freedom concerns noted in KU's own reasoning. The Swedish Press Freedom Foundation and journalist organisations are expected to scrutinise this closely.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01KU33 explicitly exempts seized digital files from being classified as public documents.
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Statement by Swedish Press Photographers' Association or Reporters Without Borders.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap">T3: Cybersecurity Legislative Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap">T3: Cybersecurity Legislative Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3-cybersecurity-legislative-gap"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟡MEDIUM
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p>The C party motion (HD024093) questioning the cybersecurity centre bill (HD03214-related) calls for further analysis before enactment. Sweden's cybersecurity posture is critical given NATO membership and the Ukraine conflict. Legislative delay in strengthening the National Cybersecurity Centre creates a potential capability gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024093 — Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) and Mikael Larsson (C) motion for further analysis.
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: NCSC operational assessment report.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth">T4: Economic Security Threat from Low Growth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth">T4: Economic Security Threat from Low Growth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4-economic-security-threat-from-low-growth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 🟠MEDIUM-HIGH
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟦VERY HIGH</p>
 <p>Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth in 2024, rising unemployment (8.69% in 2025), and inflation now at 2.84% (down from 8.55% in 2023) represent an economic security threat. The government's spring budget offers modest stimulus, but structural reforms needed for sustained growth are not visible in the current legislative pipeline. This economic fragility increases Sweden's vulnerability to external shocks (trade war, energy price spikes, global recession).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: World Bank data; HD03100 (Spring Economic Proposition), HD0399 (Supplementary Budget).
 <strong>Forward indicator</strong>: May unemployment statistics from SCB.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-severity-ranking">Severity Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-severity-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-severity-ranking">Severity Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-severity-ranking"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>T1: Migration legitimacy strain — <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> (🟧)</li>
 <li>T4: Economic security — <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> (🟧)</li>
@@ -2095,10 +2095,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-severity-ranking">Severity Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>T3: Cybersecurity gap — <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (🟡)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigation-landscape">Mitigation Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigation-landscape">Mitigation Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-landscape"></a></h3>
 <p>The Riksdag's constitutional committee processes are functioning; government has parliamentary majority to pass contested legislation; economic policy framework review (HD03241) provides transparency. Threat level is unlikely to escalate to HIGH in the 30-day window absent major external shock.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2134,13 +2134,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CMP-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>30-day forward (2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19) with 90-day fiscal/migration/constitutional trajectory extension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (Comparative Benchmarking) + Nordic + EU baseline references</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jurisdictions Benchmarked</strong></td><td>8 — Sweden · Denmark · Norway · Finland · Germany · Netherlands · United Kingdom · Estonia (+ Ireland for migration cluster)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Sources</strong></td><td>World Bank (<code>economic-data.json</code>); RSF Press Freedom Index 2025; OECD; Eurostat; national parliament sources; UN/ICC (Ukraine tribunal context)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8">🎯 Why Comparative? (per Rule 8)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-comparative-per-rule-8"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>A reference-grade month-ahead outlook must <strong>benchmark against ≥ 5 jurisdictions</strong> so that Swedish legislative developments are interpreted in context, not in isolation. Every cluster in the 30-day window (fiscal, migration, constitutional, Ukraine accountability, energy) is also a live political battleground in neighbouring jurisdictions — and the comparative lens is the most reliable way to identify where Sweden <em>innovates</em>, where it <em>follows</em>, and where it <em>diverges</em>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context">💰 C1 — Spring Fiscal Trilogy in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c1--spring-fiscal-trilogy-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment">Macroeconomic Backdrop (World Bank, 2024 GDP growth · 2025 unemployment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-backdrop-world-bank-2024-gdp-growth--2025-unemployment"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2024</th><th align="center">GDP Growth 2023</th><th align="center">Unemployment 2025</th><th align="center">Inflation 2024</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.82 %</strong></td><td align="center">−0.20 %</td><td align="center"><strong>8.69 %</strong></td><td align="center">2.84 %</td><td>Nordic-lowest GDP; unemployment at 5-year high</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">3.48 %</td><td align="center">2.50 %</td><td align="center">~5.6 %</td><td align="center">~1.3 %</td><td>Nordic-highest — pharma (Novo Nordisk) + green-tech effect</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">2.10 %</td><td align="center">0.50 %</td><td align="center">~3.8 %</td><td align="center">~3.1 %</td><td>Sovereign-wealth buffer; carbon-fee retained</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">0.42 %</td><td align="center">−0.96 %</td><td align="center">~8.4 %</td><td align="center">~1.4 %</td><td>Sweden-comparable trajectory; EU-sensitive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong> (EU benchmark)</td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">−0.30 %</td><td align="center">~3.0 %</td><td align="center">~2.2 %</td><td>EU-sluggish; Mittelstand headwinds</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">~0.9 %</td><td align="center">~0.1 %</td><td align="center">~3.7 %</td><td align="center">~3.3 %</td><td>Comparable, tight labour market</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td align="center">~0.9 %</td><td align="center">0.1 %</td><td align="center">~4.4 %</td><td align="center">~2.5 %</td><td>Comparable to Sweden on GDP; unemployment lower</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estonia</strong></td><td align="center">~0.6 %</td><td align="center">−3.0 %</td><td align="center">~7.5 %</td><td align="center">~2.1 %</td><td>Post-shock recovery; Baltic outlier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden's 0.82 % growth in 2024 — vs Denmark's 3.48 % — is the <strong>single largest empirical vulnerability</strong> in the Tidö government's economic-stewardship narrative. Finland tracks similarly poorly. The Spring Fiscal Trilogy (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236) is a <strong>stimulus response to a structural underperformance gap</strong>, not a normal cyclical fiscal calibration.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026">Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026">Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2276,7 +2276,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fiscal-stance-comparison-2026">Fiscal Stance Comparison (2026)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 Fiscal Stance</th><th align="center">Carbon-pricing discipline?</th><th align="center">Comparable instrument to HD03236 fuel-tax cut?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Mild-moderate stimulus (vårproposition + extra ändringsbudget; fuel-tax cut + el/gas relief + försvarsanslag)</td><td align="center"><strong>Partially reversed (fuel tax)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Reference (HD03236)</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Restrictive (surplus discipline; carbon fee retained; defence ↑)</td><td align="center"><strong>Full retention</strong></td><td align="center">❌ No fuel-tax cut; uses targeted income support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Moderate (oil-fund withdrawal at structural rate; carbon-fee <strong>adjusted downward but retained</strong>)</td><td align="center"><strong>Partial — carbon fee reduced in 2026 budget</strong></td><td align="center">❌ Carbon-fee adjustment, not tax cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Cautious-restrictive (debt-brake compatible)</td><td align="center">Retained</td><td align="center">❌ No fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Cautious; Schuldenbremse constraint</td><td align="center">Retained (ETS + Brennstoffemissionshandelsgesetz)</td><td align="center">❌ No cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Mild-cautious</td><td align="center">Retained</td><td align="center">❌ No cut</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Mild-restrictive (OBR fiscal rules)</td><td align="center">Retained post-Brexit (carbon pricing floor)</td><td align="center">❌ No cut</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Among Nordic peers, Denmark and Finland retain <strong>full carbon-pricing discipline</strong> while supporting cost-of-living relief through other instruments (targeted income support, energy-poverty subsidies). Norway has partially adjusted carbon fees — closer to Sweden but not cutting fuel tax directly. <strong>Sweden's 82-öre fuel-tax cut is a Nordic outlier</strong> and will be scrutinised against these peer approaches in the September 2026 campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-budget-process-comparison">Budget-Process Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-process-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget-process-comparison">Budget-Process Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-process-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2315,8 +2315,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-budget-process-comparison">Budget-Process Comparison<a class="" aria-
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th align="center">Pre-election budget sprint?</th><th>2026 session volume</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Aggressive (3 fiscal instruments simultaneously in 1 week)</td><td>Maximalist</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">— (no 2026 election)</td><td>Routine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">✅ Moderate (storting election Sep 2025 already occurred)</td><td>Moderate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">— (no 2026 election)</td><td>Routine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Routine</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: The triple-submission HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236 on 2026-04-13 has no Nordic precedent in a pre-election term. It represents the <strong>most compressed fiscal-package submission</strong> in the Tidö term.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33) in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025">Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context">📜 C2 — Constitutional Reforms (KU32/KU33) in Nordic + EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c2--constitutional-reforms-ku32ku33-in-nordic--eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025">Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2408,8 +2408,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-press-freedom-index-rsf-2025">Press-Freedom Index (RSF 2025)<a class=
 <p><strong>Key insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The <strong>Nordic normalisation argument is genuine</strong> — KU33 brings Sweden closer to Nordic peer defaults rather than deviating from them. However, <strong>the interpretive-frontier risk is real</strong>: the phrase <em>"formellt tillförd bevisning"</em> is the strategic centre of gravity. Nordic peers rely on administrative-decision chains to narrow access; HD01KU33 relies on a constitutional formulation that Lagrådet must interpret (Q2 2026 trigger).</p>
 <p><strong>HD01KU32 contextualisation</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Embedding accessibility rights in grundlag is <strong>ahead of Nordic peers</strong> — neither Denmark, Norway, nor Finland has accessibility in the constitutional canon. Sweden innovates here.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context">🚪 C3 — Migration Legislative Blitz in EU + Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-migration-policy-posture-2026">Migration-Policy Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration-policy-posture-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context">🚪 C3 — Migration Legislative Blitz in EU + Nordic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c3--migration-legislative-blitz-in-eu--nordic-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-migration-policy-posture-2026">Migration-Policy Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration-policy-posture-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2462,7 +2462,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-migration-policy-posture-2026">Migration-Policy Posture (2026)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 migration-policy direction</th><th align="center">ECHR sensitivity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Tightening: new reception law (HD03229) + deportation (HD03235) + inhibition (HD01SfU22)</td><td align="center"><strong>High — V/C/MP litigation predicate prepared</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Already-tightened 2015–2024; marginal additional tightening</td><td align="center">Low (tested through litigation already)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Moderate — Støre government recalibrating</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Tightening under Orpo coalition (2024/25 reforms)</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Tightening under Schoof cabinet (2024–)</td><td align="center">High (litigation active)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Tightening under Scholz/Merz transition</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Post-Rwanda policy shift; Labour recalibration</td><td align="center">Medium-High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>Tightening ongoing</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden is <strong>part of a broader European tightening wave</strong> (NL, DE, FI, UK). However, the <strong>simultaneous ECHR-litigation-predicate architecture</strong> prepared by V + C + MP is distinctive — only NL has equivalent coordinated civil-society + parliamentary litigation posture. Swedish migration bills therefore face the <strong>most prepared domestic legal-challenge environment</strong> in the Nordic region.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics">Reception-Law Comparison (HD03229 specifics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics">Reception-Law Comparison (HD03229 specifics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2501,8 +2501,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-reception-law-comparison-hd03229-specifics">Reception-Law Comparison
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Reception standard</th><th>Relation to EU Reception Directive (2013/33)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03229)</td><td>Tightened — narrower eligibility, tighter conditions</td><td>Approaches minimum floor of directive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Opt-out from RCEU; domestic regime</td><td>n/a (opt-out)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Implementation of 2024 EU Pact revisions</td><td>Directive-compliant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Tightened</td><td>At minimum floor; challenged</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Rebalancing 2024/25</td><td>Above minimum</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: HD03229 takes Sweden closer to the <strong>minimum floor of the EU Reception Directive</strong>. Below-floor implementation creates Commission infringement risk; at-floor creates litigation risk via individual applications to ECHR and CJEU. Likely trigger: H2 2026 NGO-filed individual applications.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context">🏛️ C4 — Ukraine Accountability Architecture (HD03231 + HD03232) in International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15">State-of-Ukraine-Tribunal Participation (as of 2026-04-15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context">🏛️ C4 — Ukraine Accountability Architecture (HD03231 + HD03232) in International Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c4--ukraine-accountability-architecture-hd03231--hd03232-in-international-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15">State-of-Ukraine-Tribunal Participation (as of 2026-04-15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2575,7 +2575,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-state-of-ukraine-tribunal-participation-as-of-2026-04-15">State-of-Uk
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>State</th><th>Formal accession status</th><th align="center">Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03231)</td><td><strong>Submitted 2026-04-16; vote May 2026</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Founding member</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Poland</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Czechia</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Baltic states</strong> (EE, LV, LT)</td><td>Founding members</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Founding member</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Japan</strong></td><td>Observer/support</td><td align="center">△</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td><strong>Ambiguous — no formal accession as of 2026-04-15</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (pending)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden joins the <strong>strongest Euro-Atlantic coalition of accountability states</strong> — 20+ European + Commonwealth jurisdictions. Swedish membership adds <strong>Nordic credibility</strong> to the tribunal architecture. US non-participation is the single largest operational question for tribunal effectiveness. Without US cooperation, the tribunal's asset-tracing and extradition authority is constrained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture">Reparations Commission (HD03232) Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture">Reparations Commission (HD03232) Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2619,8 +2619,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-reparations-commission-hd03232-architecture">Reparations Commission (
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Commission membership</th><th>Reparation funding source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03232)</td><td>Submitted 2026-04-16</td><td>Immobilised Russian assets (Euroclear, SE)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU</strong> (joint position)</td><td>Common framework</td><td>EUR 260 B immobilised (Euroclear BE + member-state holdings)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Active</td><td>BoE + crown-asset freeze</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Active</td><td>Bank-asset freeze</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Japan</strong></td><td>Observer</td><td>Sanctions-framework-aligned</td></tr><tr><td><strong>United States</strong></td><td>Active on sanctions, ambiguous on reparations</td><td>Asset freeze only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Swedish accession to the Reparations Commission carries <strong>no direct fiscal burden</strong> — reparations are funded from immobilised Russian sovereign and individual assets. However, the Nuremberg framing of the parent tribunal pre-empts domestic SD-led fiscal critique.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing">⚡ C5 — Energy Reform (HD03240 Electricity System + HD03239 Wind-Power Revenue Sharing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026">Nordic Electricity-Market Reform Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing">⚡ C5 — Energy Reform (HD03240 Electricity System + HD03239 Wind-Power Revenue Sharing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c5--energy-reform-hd03240-electricity-system--hd03239-wind-power-revenue-sharing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026">Nordic Electricity-Market Reform Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2663,7 +2663,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nordic-electricity-market-reform-posture-2026">Nordic Electricity-Mar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>2026 electricity reform direction</th><th align="center">Grid-capacity priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03240)</td><td>New electricity-system law (market design update + capacity mechanism)</td><td align="center">High — SE3/SE4 bottleneck</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Offshore-wind + interconnection expansion</td><td align="center">High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Oil-fund-funded grid investment</td><td align="center">High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>OL3 online; grid modernisation</td><td align="center">Medium-high</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Kraftwerkssicherheitsgesetz (2024)</td><td align="center">High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>REMA (Review of Electricity Market Arrangements)</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: Sweden's HD03240 is <strong>aligned with Nordic neighbours</strong> on grid modernisation. Convergent on capacity-mechanism design; divergent on carbon-price interaction (Sweden's fuel-tax cut creates a cross-cluster tension with HD03240's low-carbon goals).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239">Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing Models (HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239">Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing Models (HD03239)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2696,8 +2696,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-wind-power-revenue-sharing-models-hd03239">Wind-Power Revenue-Sharing
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Municipal revenue-sharing model</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD03239)</td><td><strong>New — revenue share to host municipalities</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Eiendomsskatt + landowner rent; established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>VE-bonus; established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>EEG / Bürgerenergie provisions; established</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Community benefit funds; established</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[MEDIUM]</code>: HD03239 <strong>catches Sweden up with Nordic + German peers</strong> on a widely-adopted revenue-sharing model. This is <strong>follower legislation</strong>, not innovation — but the Swedish framing is unusually clear on municipal-financial incentive design.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context">🛡️ C6 — NATO eFP Deployment (HD01UFöU3) in Alliance Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026">NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context">🛡️ C6 — NATO eFP Deployment (HD01UFöU3) in Alliance Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c6--nato-efp-deployment-hd01uföu3-in-alliance-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026">NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nato-efp-contributor-posture-2026">NATO eFP Contributor Posture (2026
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Contributor</th><th>Deployment posture to Finland</th><th align="center">Scale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (HD01UFöU3)</td><td><strong>First major deployment post-NATO accession</strong></td><td align="center">1,200 troops</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Estonia (Tapa) — persistent</td><td align="center">≈ 900</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Lithuania (Rukla → Kaunas) — expanding</td><td align="center">≈ 4,800 (2027 target)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Canada</strong></td><td>Latvia (Adazi)</td><td align="center">≈ 2,200 (expanding to brigade)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US</strong></td><td>Poland (persistent)</td><td align="center">≈ 10,000</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Romania (eVA)</td><td align="center">≈ 1,500</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Lithuania (rotational) + Finland support</td><td align="center">≈ 200–400</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: Sweden's 1,200-troop deployment to Finland is <strong>proportionate to mid-tier European contributors</strong> and establishes operational integration immediately post-accession. Comparable to French Romania deployment in scale. Doctrinal precedent: Sweden moves from accession (March 2024) to operational contribution within 2 years — a <strong>rapid integration timeline</strong> by Nordic historical standards.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks">📊 Summary: Sweden's Position in 5 Cluster-Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks">📊 Summary: Sweden's Position in 5 Cluster-Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2802,26 +2802,26 @@ <h2 id="rm--summary-swedens-position-in-5-cluster-benchmarks">📊 Summary: Swed
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Sweden's Posture</th><th>Vs Nordic Peers</th><th>Vs EU Peers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal trilogy</td><td>Stimulus + fuel-tax cut</td><td><strong>Nordic outlier (carbon-policy reversal)</strong></td><td>Below Nordic benchmarks on climate; comparable on targeted relief</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 constitutional</td><td>Narrowing digital FOI on seized material</td><td><strong>Nordic-aligned</strong></td><td>Stricter than DE (StPO); Nordic-normal</td></tr><tr><td>KU32 constitutional</td><td>Accessibility in grundlag</td><td><strong>Nordic-leading</strong></td><td>Nordic-leading</td></tr><tr><td>Migration blitz</td><td>Tightening</td><td><strong>Part of Nordic wave (FI, DK parallel)</strong></td><td>Part of EU wave; most-prepared litigation-predicate environment</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal</td><td>Founding member</td><td><strong>Aligned with NATO-Europe + UK</strong></td><td>Joined the core coalition</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP</td><td>1,200 troops to Finland</td><td><strong>First operational NATO output</strong></td><td>Mid-tier contribution</td></tr><tr><td>Energy reform</td><td>Electricity-system + wind-revenue share</td><td><strong>Follower</strong> (Nordic catch-up)</td><td>Comparable to DE, DK, NO</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications">🔍 Where Sweden Diverges — Narrative Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications">🔍 Where Sweden Diverges — Narrative Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-diverges--narrative-implications"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fuel-tax cut = Nordic outlier</strong> ⇒ climate-credibility cost; media attack surface from MP + V; L + KD internal strain</li>
 <li><strong>ECHR-litigation-predicate architecture on migration = uniquely coordinated</strong> ⇒ post-enactment legal exposure higher than DK (which has opt-outs) or FI</li>
 <li><strong>KU33 interpretive ambiguity = idiosyncratic Swedish risk</strong> ⇒ Lagrådet Q2 2026 yttrande is the single most consequential upcoming legal document</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-innovates">🔭 Where Sweden Innovates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-innovates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates">🔭 Where Sweden Innovates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>KU32 accessibility in grundlag</strong> — first Nordic jurisdiction to embed</li>
 <li><strong>HD03232 reparations commission accession timing</strong> — Sweden in founding cohort</li>
 <li><strong>HD03239 wind-power revenue-sharing</strong> — clearest Nordic-convergent municipal-incentive design</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--where-sweden-follows">🔁 Where Sweden Follows<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--where-sweden-follows"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-follows">🔁 Where Sweden Follows<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-follows"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Migration tightening</strong> — follows NL, FI, DE, UK wave</li>
 <li><strong>Electricity-system reform</strong> — catches up with Nordic neighbours</li>
 <li><strong>NATO eFP</strong> — mid-tier contribution post-accession</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference">📎 Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference">📎 Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code></a> — canonical Week-16 benchmark baseline (extended here to 30-day forward)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md"><code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/comparative-international.md</code></a> — KU32/KU33 constitutional-cluster deep-dive</li>
@@ -2830,7 +2830,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-reference">📎 Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 (weekly checkpoint) or on material jurisdiction-shift · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2862,7 +2862,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CLS-ID</strong></td><td>CLS-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>30-day forward (2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19); 90-day supplementary</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 (CIA triad + sensitivity tier + domain taxonomy + urgency matrix) + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5 coverage-completeness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VERY LOW · 🟥 LOW · 🟧 MEDIUM · 🟩 HIGH · 🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Classified</strong></td><td>24 primary + 19 counter-motions tracked</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classification Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity--classification-tier-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2896,7 +2896,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity--classification-tier-summary">🎯 Sensitivity / Classif
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Definition</th><th>Documents This Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🔴 P0 — Constitutional / Critical</strong></td><td>Grundlag amendments; democratic-infrastructure changes; reversal window decadal</td><td><code>HD01KU32</code> (accessibility · rights-positive), <code>HD01KU33</code> (digital-evidence search/seizure · press-freedom risk)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟠 P1 — Strategic National</strong></td><td>Foreign-policy treaty accession; major fiscal commitments; criminal-justice frame; security operations</td><td><code>HD03100</code>, <code>HD0399</code>, <code>HD03236</code> (fiscal trilogy); <code>HD03220</code>, <code>HD01UFöU3</code> (NATO eFP); <code>HD03231</code>, <code>HD03232</code> (Ukraine accountability); <code>HD03229</code>, <code>HD03235</code>, <code>HD01SfU22</code> (migration blitz); <code>HD03246</code> (juvenile tightening); <code>HD03237</code> (police training)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟡 P2 — Sector / Regulated</strong></td><td>Energy, housing, accessibility, sector-specific reforms</td><td><code>HD03240</code>, <code>HD03239</code>, <code>HD01SkU23</code> (energy); <code>HD03244</code>, <code>HD01TU21</code> (digital); <code>HD03238</code> (environmental permitting); <code>HD03245</code> (violence-against-women strategy); <code>HD01CU27</code>, <code>HD01CU28</code> (housing register)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🟢 P3 — Routine / Administrative</strong></td><td>EU-directive transposition, sector updates, Riksrevisionen reports</td><td><code>HD01MJU19</code> (waste legislation), <code>HD03242</code> (forestry framework), <code>HD03241</code> (Riksrevisionen fiscal-framework report), <code>HD0398</code> (tax-expenditure report), <code>HD03101</code> (state annual report 2025)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity-tier insight</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>: The 30-day window contains <strong>2 P0 constitutional items</strong>, <strong>12 P1 strategic-national items</strong>, and <strong>9 P2 sector-regulated items</strong> — the highest concentration of P0 + P1 in a single 30-day window observed in the 2025/26 session. This confirms the <strong>pre-election maximalist legislative posture</strong> identified at the aggregate level.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cia-triad-impact-per-document"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Where CIA = <strong>C</strong>onfidentiality (information protection / institutional secrecy), <strong>I</strong>ntegrity (rule-of-law durability + transparency), <strong>A</strong>vailability (citizen access to rights / services). Scored ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -3083,7 +3083,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cia-triad-impact-per-document">🧮 CIA-Triad Impact per Document<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Confidentiality</th><th align="center">Integrity</th><th align="center">Availability</th><th align="center">Net Democratic Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td align="center">🟦 VH (raises confidentiality of police-seized digital material)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (narrows transparency / "allmän handling")</td><td align="center">🟧 M (citizens lose insight into investigations)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on transparency</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 M (no change)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rights-positive — accessibility entrenched in grundlag)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (citizens with disabilities gain access)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>Net positive on rights</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 (Vårproposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (fiscal accountability framework intact)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (welfare delivery + relief)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399 (Vårändringsbudget)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236 (Extra ändringsbudget — fuel-tax cut)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (direct household relief)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive (climate-caveat)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (JuU juvenile tightening)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (juvenile-data confidentiality concerns from longer remand)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (extends carceral state vs rehab)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (police investigative capacity ↑; juvenile rights ↓)</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>Mixed</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 (Ukraine Special Tribunal)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (rule-of-law + accountability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (no direct citizen impact)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 (Reparations Commission)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (reparations rule-of-law architecture)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03229 (Reception law)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (eligibility narrowed)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on rights</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03235 (Deportation rules)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces procedural protection)</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on rights (ECHR risk)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22 (Inhibition orders)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟥 L (reduces appeal mechanism)</td><td align="center">🟥 L (asylum-seeker access ↓)</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>Net negative on rights (ECHR risk)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3 / HD03220 (NATO eFP Finland)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (military operational secrecy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (NATO Article 5 credibility)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (förändrar säkerhetsläget)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (Electricity-system laws)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (legal coherence ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (smart-grid investment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239 (Wind-power revenue sharing)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H (municipal revenue + climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23 (EV-charging tax relief)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H (green-mobility incentive)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238 (New environmental permitting agency)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M (institutional complexity short-term)</td><td align="center">🟧 Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245 (Violence-against-women strategy)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (victim privacy)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H (services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237 (Paid police training)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H (recruitment ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (police capacity)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27 (Identity for property registration)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (data integrity)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (AML enforcement ↑)</td><td align="center">🟧 M (consumer protection ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 (National housing register)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (register data)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (market integrity ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (property-market transparency ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244 (Data interoperability)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (cross-agency services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21 (State e-ID)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (authentication)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (fraud reduction ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (digital services ↑)</td><td align="center">🟦 Net positive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242 (Forestry framework)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">Mixed (climate trade-off)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19 (Waste legislation)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU compliance ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 H (circular economy ↑)</td><td align="center">🟩 Net positive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net democratic impact summary</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: 14 documents are <strong>net positive</strong> on democratic impact; 3 documents are <strong>net negative on rights</strong> (migration trio: HD03229, HD03235, HD01SfU22); 2 documents are <strong>mixed</strong> (HD03246 juvenile, HD03238 permitting); 1 document is <strong>net negative on transparency</strong> (HD01KU33). The rights-negative cluster is the <strong>single most concentrated rights-sensitive package</strong> in the 2025/26 session, validating the ECHR-litigation-predicate analysis.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact">🏛️ Per-Document Classification Matrix (Domain + Controversy + Urgency + EU impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact">🏛️ Per-Document Classification Matrix (Domain + Controversy + Urgency + EU impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--eu-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3366,7 +3366,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-per-document-classification-matrix-domain--controversy--urgency--
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Political Valence</th><th>Ideological Driver</th><th align="center">Controversy</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">EU Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>Macroeconomic</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Fiscal conservatism + election spending</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟧 M (Stability Pact)</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Budget management</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (fuel-tax cut)</td><td>Energy/fiscal</td><td>Right-populist</td><td>Cost-of-living relief + fossil industry</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU carbon pricing / state aid)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03229</td><td>Reception law</td><td>Migration</td><td>Far-Right</td><td>SD core agenda</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU Reception Directive 2013/33)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Deportation rules</td><td>Justice/Migration</td><td>Right-populist</td><td>SD agenda</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU returns directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition orders</td><td>Migration/Legal</td><td>Far-Right</td><td>SD core agenda</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (ECHR Art 3/8 exposure)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Juvenile tightening</td><td>Criminal justice</td><td>Right-Conservative</td><td>Law and order, SD-aligned</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Paid police training</td><td>Justice/Security</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Recruitment pragmatism</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220 / HD01UFöU3</td><td>NATO eFP Finland</td><td>Defence/Foreign</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>NATO Article 5 commitment</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (NATO integration)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Special Tribunal (Ukraine)</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Rule-of-law norm entrepreneurship</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU common foreign policy)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Reparations Commission (Ukraine)</td><td>Foreign/Rule of Law</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Rule-of-law norm entrepreneurship</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">🟩 H (immobilised Russian assets)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Accessibility in grundlag</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Disability rights</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P0</td><td align="center">🟧 M (EU accessibility directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Digital-evidence narrowing</td><td>Constitutional/Press</td><td>Right-Conservative</td><td>Investigation efficacy</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P0</td><td align="center">🟧 M (ECHR Art 10 exposure)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity-system laws</td><td>Energy</td><td>Center</td><td>Energy security, transition</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU electricity directive)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind-power revenue sharing</td><td>Energy/Local Gov</td><td>Center</td><td>Municipal acceptance</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>EV-charging tax relief</td><td>Tax/Energy</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Green-mobility pragmatism</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Environmental permitting agency</td><td>Environment</td><td>Center</td><td>Institutional modernisation</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M (EU water/air directives)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Data interoperability</td><td>Digital/Admin</td><td>Center</td><td>EU digital single market</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (EU Data Act / Interoperability Act)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>State e-ID</td><td>Digital</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Fraud reduction</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU eIDAS 2.0)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Violence-against-women strategy</td><td>Social/Gender</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Rights-frame</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M (Istanbul Convention)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property-registration identity</td><td>Housing/Crime</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>AML-frame</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU AML-package)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Housing register</td><td>Housing</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Market integrity</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Waste legislation</td><td>Environment/EU</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>EU compliance</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">P3</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (EU waste framework)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Forestry framework</td><td>Agriculture/Environment</td><td>Center-Right</td><td>Forestry-industry pragmatism</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td align="center">P3</td><td align="center">🟩 H (EU Forest Strategy, LULUCF)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-decision-tree-visual">🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (visual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-decision-tree-visual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-visual">🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (visual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree-visual"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A[New dok in 30-day window] --> B{Constitutional&#x3C;br/>grundlag change?}
     B -->|Yes| P0["🔴 P0 — Constitutional/Critical&#x3C;br/>Requires 2 Riksdag votes bracketing election"]
@@ -3381,7 +3381,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-decision-tree-visual">🧭 Sensitivity Decision Tree (vi
     P2 --> Z[Cover in week-ahead + weekly-review]
     P3 --> W[Cover in monthly / quarterly review]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--policy-domain-distribution">🌐 Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--policy-domain-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-distribution">🌐 Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3456,7 +3456,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--policy-domain-distribution">🌐 Policy Domain Distribution<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Example dok_ids</th><th align="center">Election-2026 Salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal / Economic</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (cost-of-living)</td></tr><tr><td>Migration / Justice</td><td align="center">5</td><td>HD03229, HD03235, HD01SfU22, HD03246, HD03237</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign / Defence (Ukraine+NATO)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03220, HD01UFöU3, HD03231, HD03232</td><td align="center">🟧 M (cross-party)</td></tr><tr><td>Energy / Climate</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD03236 (overlap), HD03240, HD03239, HD01SkU23</td><td align="center">🟩 H (climate dimension)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td align="center">🟥 L (unless chilling-effect case breaks)</td></tr><tr><td>Digital / Admin</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03244, HD01TU21</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>Social / Gender / Rights</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03245, HD10438 (interpellation)</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Housing / Property</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td></tr><tr><td>Environment (pure)</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD03238, HD01MJU19</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry / Agriculture</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD03242</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Insight</strong> <code>[HIGH]</code>: The four highest-salience domains (Fiscal, Migration/Justice, Foreign/Defence, Energy/Climate) contain <strong>17 of 24 documents</strong> — this confirms the month-ahead has a <strong>concentrated campaign-relevance footprint</strong> that maps directly onto the expected 2026 campaign themes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-governing-coalition-policy-vector">🏛️ Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector">🏛️ Governing Coalition Policy Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-coalition-policy-vector"></a></h3>
 <p>The April–May 2026 legislative cluster represents a <strong>rightward acceleration</strong> in coalition policy as elections approach, but with three domain-specific exceptions:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Criminal justice</strong>: Punitive turn on juvenile crime (HD03246) + paid police training (HD03237) advances SD/M joint agenda</li>
@@ -3523,13 +3523,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-governing-coalition-policy-vector">🏛️ Governing Coalition Po
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">Tension level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03236 (fuel-tax cut)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (climate)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (climate)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟧 Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD03229 / HD03235 (migration)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (liberal-humanitarian)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟧 Medium (L identity strain)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (juvenile)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (juvenile-rights)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟥 Low-Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33 (digital-evidence)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (transparency)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">🟥 Low-Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 / HD03239 (energy)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️ (local-impact)</td><td align="center">🟥 Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-conflict-lines">⚖️ Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-conflict-lines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conflict-lines">⚖️ Conflict Lines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conflict-lines"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition vs. Opposition</strong>: All fiscal-cut + migration + HD01KU33 measures have clear left-right fault lines. The 19 counter-motions filed by S/V/MP/C are the structural evidence.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition internal</strong>: L's liberal values create tension with HD03246 juvenile rights provisions, HD01SfU22 humanitarian concerns, and HD03236 climate reversal. KD's climate/family-values profile creates minor tension on fuel-tax cut.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden vs. EU</strong>: HD03236 (fuel-tax cuts) creates tension with EU's carbon-pricing agenda + potential state-aid scrutiny; HD01SfU22 + HD03229 face EU Reception-Directive and ECHR compatibility questions.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden vs. Nordic peers</strong>: HD03236 is a <strong>Nordic outlier on climate discipline</strong> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §C1.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--eu--international-impact-summary">🌍 EU / International Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--eu--international-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-eu--international-impact-summary">🌍 EU / International Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu--international-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3632,7 +3632,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--eu--international-impact-summary">🌍 EU / International Impact Sum
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>EU / International Regime</th><th>Affected dok_ids</th><th>Risk type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EU Reception Directive (2013/33)</td><td>HD03229</td><td>Infringement / minimum-floor compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU Returns Directive</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR Art 3 (prohibition of torture)</td><td>HD01SfU22, HD03229, HD03235</td><td>Individual-application litigation</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR Art 8 (family life)</td><td>HD01SfU22, HD03229</td><td>Individual-application litigation</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR Art 10 (expression)</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Press-freedom case-law exposure</td></tr><tr><td>EU Stability &#x26; Growth Pact</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Fiscal surveillance</td></tr><tr><td>EU State Aid (Art 107 TFEU)</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Commission notification required</td></tr><tr><td>EU Carbon Pricing / EU ETS</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Climate-policy coherence</td></tr><tr><td>EU Electricity Directive</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU eIDAS 2.0</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU Data Act / Interoperability Act</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU AML-package</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>EU Forest Strategy / LULUCF</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Climate-reporting coherence</td></tr><tr><td>EU Waste Framework</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Compliance</td></tr><tr><td>NATO / Washington Treaty</td><td>HD01UFöU3, HD03220</td><td>Operational integration</td></tr><tr><td>Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression (UN-framed)</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Founding-member status</td></tr><tr><td>International Compensation Commission (Ukraine)</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Founding-member status</td></tr><tr><td>Istanbul Convention</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Compliance + narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-historical-classification-analogy">🕰️ Historical Classification Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-historical-classification-analogy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-classification-analogy">🕰️ Historical Classification Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-classification-analogy"></a></h3>
 <p>This legislative sprint is analogous to the <strong>Reinfeldt government's 2009 fiscal expansion</strong> (anti-austerity during financial crisis) in its use of supplementary-budget mechanisms — but with three key differences:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Direction</strong>: Reinfeldt 2009 was centrist crisis-management; Tidö 2026 is ideologically homogeneous (right-populist). The fuel-tax cut is the signature ideological marker.</li>
@@ -3640,7 +3640,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-historical-classification-analogy">🕰️ Historical Classificat
 <li><strong>International commitments</strong>: Reinfeldt 2009 used financial-crisis cooperation; Tidö 2026 makes <strong>2 decadal commitments</strong> (Ukraine tribunal, NATO eFP) that outlast any single parliamentary term.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--references">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-references">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — composite scoring methodology and coverage-completeness gate</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — L×I risk-scored per cluster with 30/60/90-day triggers</li>
@@ -3651,12 +3651,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--references">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0 + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19T11:37:00Z
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: month-ahead</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-network">Thematic Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster">Budget &#x26; Fiscal Policy Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-network">Thematic Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster">Budget &#x26; Fiscal Policy Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03100</strong> (Spring Economic Proposition) ↔ <strong>HD0399</strong> (Supplementary Budget) ↔ <strong>HD03236</strong> (Extra Budget: Fuel Tax)</li>
 <li>All three go through FiU (Finance Committee)</li>
@@ -3664,7 +3664,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-budget--fiscal-policy-cluster">Budget &#x26; Fiscal Policy Cluster<a
 <li>Interpellations: HD10433 (tax reform overview), HD10427 (PostNord/state ownership)</li>
 <li>Economic framework: HD03241 (Riksrevisionen fiscal framework report), HD03101 (State Annual Report 2025), HD0398 (Tax expenditure report)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster">Ukraine &#x26; International Security Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster">Ukraine &#x26; International Security Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03231</strong> (Ukraine Tribunal) ↔ <strong>HD03232</strong> (Ukraine Compensation Commission) ↔ <strong>HD03220</strong> (NATO Finland)</li>
 <li>HD03220/HD01UFöU3: UFöU committee report already issued — most advanced in legislative pipeline</li>
@@ -3672,7 +3672,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ukraine--international-security-cluster">Ukraine &#x26; International
 <li>Cross-party support expected; these bills are not controversial across party lines</li>
 <li>International context: UN/ICC developments on Ukraine accountability</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-migration--justice-cluster">Migration &#x26; Justice Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration--justice-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-migration--justice-cluster">Migration &#x26; Justice Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-migration--justice-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03229</strong> (Reception Law) ↔ <strong>HD03235</strong> (Deportation Rules) ↔ <strong>HD01SfU22</strong> (Inhibition Orders)</li>
 <li>All handled by SfU (Social Insurance/Migration Committee)</li>
@@ -3680,28 +3680,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-migration--justice-cluster">Migration &#x26; Justice Cluster<a class=
 <li>Counter-motion network: V (HD024090), MP (HD024097), C (HD024095) on deportation; S (HD024080), MP (HD024087), C (HD024089) on reception law</li>
 <li>Interpellation links: HD10429 (freedom of speech / prop 133), HD10420 (police authority), HD10422 (integration/labour)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-energy--climate-cluster">Energy &#x26; Climate Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy--climate-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy--climate-cluster">Energy &#x26; Climate Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy--climate-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03240</strong> (Electricity Laws) ↔ <strong>HD03239</strong> (Wind Power) ↔ <strong>HD01SkU23</strong> (EV Charging Tax Relief)</li>
 <li>HD03238 (Environmental Permitting Agency) linked to siting of energy infrastructure</li>
 <li>Counter-motion: HD024098, HD024092 (V, MP opposing fuel tax = climate conflict with HD03236)</li>
 <li>Constitutional link: HD01MJU19 (Waste Legislation) also in MJU</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-digital-governance-cluster">Digital Governance Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-digital-governance-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-digital-governance-cluster">Digital Governance Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-digital-governance-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03244</strong> (Data Interoperability) ↔ <strong>HD01TU21</strong> (State e-ID)</li>
 <li>HD03214-related: HD024093 (C motion on cybersecurity centre)</li>
 <li>All linked to Sweden's EU digital single market obligations</li>
 <li>Intersects with HD01KU33 (public documents/digital files)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-housing--property-cluster">Housing &#x26; Property Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-housing--property-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-housing--property-cluster">Housing &#x26; Property Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-housing--property-cluster"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28</strong> (National Housing Register) ↔ <strong>HD01CU27</strong> (Identity for Property Registration)</li>
 <li>Interpellation link: HD10434 (Stockholm housing construction decline)</li>
 <li>Anti-money-laundering dimension: identity requirements connect to financial crime prevention</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-decision-dependencies">Key Decision Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decision-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-decision-dependencies">Key Decision Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decision-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>HD03236 (Fuel Tax Vote)
     → FiU committee report [2-3 weeks]
     → Plenary vote [late April/early May]
@@ -3719,7 +3719,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-decision-dependencies">Key Decision Dependencies<a class="" aria-
     → Post-enactment: court challenges likely
 </code></pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-count-by-committee">Document Count by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-count-by-committee"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-count-by-committee">Document Count by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-count-by-committee"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3819,7 +3819,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-count-by-committee">Document Count by Committee<a class="" a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Committee</th><th>Propositions</th><th>Betänkanden</th><th>Motions</th><th>Interpellations</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU (Finance)</td><td>6 (budgets + fiscal)</td><td>2+</td><td>4</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>SfU (Social/Migration)</td><td>3 (migration)</td><td>2</td><td>7</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU (Foreign/Defence)</td><td>3 (Ukraine/NATO)</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>UU (Foreign Affairs)</td><td>2 (Ukraine)</td><td>0</td><td>2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>JuU (Justice)</td><td>3 (crime/police)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>NU/KlN (Energy)</td><td>3 (electricity)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>KU (Constitutional)</td><td>0</td><td>2 (vilande)</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>MJU (Environment)</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>TU (Transport)</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>0</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>AU (Labour)</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>SoU (Health)</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>CU (Civil)</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Observation</strong>: FiU and SfU carry the heaviest legislative load in this period, reflecting the government's dual priority of economic management and migration control.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3855,7 +3855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>MET-ID</strong></td><td>MET-MA-2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Period Covered</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 → 2026-05-19 (30-day base; 90-day and post-election extensions)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology Audited</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Self-Audit Type</strong></td><td>Per Rule 7 (Reference-Grade Self-Audit)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Continuity Window</strong></td><td>2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 (5 days, 7 sibling runs)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence Scale</strong></td><td>⬛ VL · 🟥 L · 🟧 M · 🟩 H · 🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7, every reference-grade analysis package must include an explicit <strong>methodology self-audit</strong> documenting:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Which methodologies were applied to which analytical artefacts</li>
@@ -3867,7 +3867,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ol>
 <p>This file makes the analysis <strong>legible to readers, auditors, and methodology owners</strong> and creates a feedback loop into the canonical methodology guides.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3983,11 +3983,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--methodology-application-matrix">📋 Methodology Application Matrix<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology</th><th>Doctrine Source</th><th>Applied to Files</th><th align="center">Application Quality</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DIW v1.0 (Democratic-Impact Weighting)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>significance-scoring.md</code>, <code>README.md</code> §Lead-Story Decision, <code>executive-brief.md</code> §BLUF</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (lead-story DIW weighted 9.8/9.5/9.3 across three co-prominent clusters)</td></tr><tr><td>5-dimension significance composite</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Top-20 Ranking</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (20 documents scored)</td></tr><tr><td>CIA-triad classification</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code> §CIA-Triad Impact</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (per-document)</td></tr><tr><td>Sensitivity-tier classification (P0–P3)</td><td><code>political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code> §Tier Summary</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage-Completeness gate (composite ≥ 70)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Coverage gate, <code>executive-brief.md</code> §Bullet 8</td><td align="center">🟩 H (all 20 ≥ 65 → all candidate for article coverage)</td></tr><tr><td>8-stakeholder SWOT</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code> (mandatory 8 groups completed)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>TOWS cross-cluster interference</td><td><code>political-swot-framework.md</code> v3.0</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code> §Stakeholder Analysis cross-cluster, <code>README.md</code> §cross-cluster tension</td><td align="center">🟧 M (implicit; could be made explicit in future runs)</td></tr><tr><td>5×5 risk matrix + Bayesian + ALARP + cascading</td><td><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> v2.x</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center">🟩 H (8 risks; heatmap; cascading mentioned in R2→R7 chain)</td></tr><tr><td>STRIDE / Attack-tree / Kill-chain / Diamond</td><td><code>political-threat-framework.md</code> v2.0</td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code> §T1–T4</td><td align="center">🟧 M (severity ranking present; per-letter STRIDE decomposition abbreviated — acceptable for 30-day horizon)</td></tr><tr><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Scenario Analysis</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §ACH Grid</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian priors with named triggers</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code></td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §90-Day Monitoring Calendar; <code>risk-assessment.md</code> §Forward Indicators</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative benchmarking (Rule 8)</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> (8 jurisdictions)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-cluster thematic mapping</td><td>Internal practice</td><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code> (6 clusters + counter-motion network)</td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>Election-2026 lens</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 5/6</td><td>All Tier-A/B files §Election 2026</td><td align="center">🟦 VH (mandatory section met)</td></tr><tr><td>Provenance discipline</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 2</td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></td><td align="center">🟩 H</td></tr><tr><td>5-level confidence scale</td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 4</td><td>All files (visible in tables)</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (NEW)</strong></td><td><strong>Added as Rule 9 candidate</strong> (see Recommendations §3)</td><td>This file §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation</td><td align="center">🟦 VH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows">🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory for Aggregation Workflows)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows">🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory for Aggregation Workflows)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Per the "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol added to <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code></strong>, every forward indicator issued in the last 5 days of sibling daily runs MUST be either <strong>carried forward</strong> into this month-ahead package or <strong>explicitly retired</strong> with a one-line reason.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18">Forward Indicators Ingested from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18">Forward Indicators Ingested from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4087,7 +4087,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-ingested-from-2026-04-14--2026-04-18">Forward Indi
 <p><strong>Reconciliation summary</strong>: 14 of 16 upstream watchpoints carried forward; 2 explicitly retired (outside 30-day horizon); 1 carried with reduced priority (S-leadership KU33 position, since 30-day window pre-dates likely crystallisation).</p>
 <p><strong>No silent drops</strong> <code>[VERY HIGH]</code>. This establishes the <strong>continuity-of-intelligence contract</strong> required for reference-grade aggregation work.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--uncertainty-hot-spots">🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-uncertainty-hot-spots">🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h3>
 <p>The following dimensions of this month-ahead package carry <strong>structural uncertainty</strong> that should be tracked explicitly:</p>
 
 
@@ -4160,7 +4160,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--uncertainty-hot-spots">🔥 Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Hot-Spot</th><th>Source of Uncertainty</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">U1</td><td>Post-Sep Riksdag composition</td><td>Entirely contingent on election</td><td align="center">🟥 L (post-Sep)</td><td>Treated via scenario bands (S1/S2/S3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U2</td><td>Lagrådet interpretation of <em>"formellt tillförd bevisning"</em> in HD01KU33</td><td>Legal-interpretive uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Comparative benchmark (Nordic press-freedom regimes) provides prior</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U3</td><td>US cooperation with HD03231 tribunal</td><td>Public US statements ambiguous</td><td align="center">🟥 L</td><td>Black-swan B1 path modelled</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U4</td><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response timing/magnitude</td><td>Strategic-actor choice</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Wildcard W1 baseline rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U5</td><td>ECHR docket pace on inhibition-orders challenge</td><td>Court-scheduling uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Wildcard W2 tracks</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U6</td><td>Q1 2026 macro data direction (SCB 2026-05-28)</td><td>Data-release uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟩 H (baseline direction)</td><td>Single most decisive pre-summer indicator</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U7</td><td>Coalition-internal discipline on fuel-tax-cut climate tension</td><td>L + KD identity strain</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Watched via Alliansen party-conference statements</td></tr><tr><td align="center">U8</td><td>Counter-motion → manifesto translation success</td><td>Media-framing contingent</td><td align="center">🟧 M</td><td>Track legacy-media coverage of HD024079-HD024097 series</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall confidence</strong> for this package <code>[HIGH — 🟩]</code>: 30-day legislative calendar is near-certain; vote outcomes on Tidö majority bills are highly certain (JuU15 145–142 signature validated); scenario bands beyond 30 days carry irreducible election-year uncertainty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-known-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>30-day horizon truncation</strong>: Some upstream watchpoints (e.g., W10 RSF 2027 publication, W11 Lantmäteriet Q3 procurement) fall outside this window and cannot be followed here. They are preserved for annual/quarterly outlooks.</p>
@@ -4182,7 +4182,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-known-limitations">⚠️ Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidde
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h3>
 <p>Per the <code>copilot-instructions.md</code> <strong>AI FIRST</strong> principle (minimum 2 complete iterations), this package was iterated from a 9-artifact base to a 14-artifact reference-grade package. Specific improvements:</p>
 
 
@@ -4224,24 +4224,24 @@ <h2 id="rm--pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">🔬 Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvem
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Improvement</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5 new Tier-C artefacts added</td><td><code>README.md</code> · <code>executive-brief.md</code> · <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> · <code>comparative-international.md</code> · <code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>Upstream watchpoint reconciliation added</td><td>This file §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation — 16 watchpoints audited</td></tr><tr><td><code>classification-results.md</code> expanded from composite-table only to CIA-triad + sensitivity-tier + domain distribution + Nordic + EU benchmarks</td><td>See enriched file</td></tr><tr><td>Named-politician attribution increased</td><td>13+ ministers/party leaders named in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a> §Named Actors</td></tr><tr><td>30-day vote calendar added</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a> §30-Day Vote Calendar</td></tr><tr><td>ACH grid for 30-day resolution added</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §ACH Grid</td></tr><tr><td>8-jurisdiction comparative benchmark added</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Single-pass output (the original 9-artefact base) was <strong>shallow</strong> on upstream continuity and comparative benchmarking. The Pass-2 improvement transforms the package into a <strong>reference-grade aggregation artefact</strong> matching the 2026-04-18/weekly-review exemplar bar.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">💡 Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows">R1. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "14 REQUIRED Artifacts for Aggregation Workflows"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">💡 Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows">R1. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "14 REQUIRED Artifacts for Aggregation Workflows"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-14-required-artifacts-for-aggregation-workflows"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The 9-artefact gate applies to all workflows. <strong>Aggregation workflows</strong> (month-ahead, week-ahead, evening-analysis, weekly-review, monthly-review) should additionally produce 5 Tier-C reference-grade artefacts: <code>README.md</code>, <code>executive-brief.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, <code>comparative-international.md</code>, <code>methodology-reflection.md</code>. This brings aggregation workflows to the 14-artefact reference-grade bar established by <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/</code></a>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol">R2. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol">R2. <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> — Add "Recent Daily Knowledge Base Synthesis" protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2-shared_prompt_patternsmd--add-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis-protocol"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Aggregation workflows MUST read every <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>significance-scoring.md</code> from the last <strong>N days</strong> of sibling daily runs (N = 7 for week-ahead, 14 for month-ahead, 14–30 for monthly-review). Every forward indicator in those upstream files MUST be either <strong>carried forward</strong> or <strong>explicitly retired</strong> in the aggregation package's <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation. No silent drops.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9">R3. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Promote Upstream Continuity to Rule 9<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9">R3. <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> — Promote Upstream Continuity to Rule 9<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd--promote-upstream-continuity-to-rule-9"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Add <strong>Rule 9: Upstream Continuity Contract</strong> to the canonical rule set. Any aggregation work whose horizon overlaps a prior run's forward indicators MUST reconcile them in a dedicated section. This is the <strong>continuity-of-intelligence discipline</strong> that makes the monitor a coherent ongoing intelligence product rather than a series of disconnected snapshots.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt">R4. <code>news-month-ahead.md</code> — Update Workflow Prompt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt">R4. <code>news-month-ahead.md</code> — Update Workflow Prompt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r4-news-month-aheadmd--update-workflow-prompt"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The month-ahead workflow prompt (and peer aggregation workflow prompts) should explicitly require the 14-artefact production and the upstream watchpoint reconciliation before article generation. See PR for proposed diff.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-r5-template-updates">R5. Template Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-template-updates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r5-template-updates">R5. Template Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r5-template-updates"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Add template stubs to <code>analysis/templates/</code>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -4253,7 +4253,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r5-template-updates">R5. Template Updates<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--references-1">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-references-1">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 (Rules 0–8 applied; Rule 9 proposed here)</li>
 <li><code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code> v3.0</li>
@@ -4265,10 +4265,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--references-1">📎 References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: on any material methodology-doctrine update · <strong>Methodology</strong>: self-audit per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19 11:20 UTC · <strong>Pipeline mode</strong>: aggregation (live MCP + upstream synthesis)
 <strong>Produced By</strong>: <code>news-month-ahead</code> agentic workflow, consolidated by News Journalist agent</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ingestion-mode">Ingestion mode<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ingestion-mode"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ingestion-mode">Ingestion mode<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ingestion-mode"></a></h3>
 <p>This month-ahead package is an <strong>aggregation product</strong>: it does not re-download raw documents via the
 <code>download-parliamentary-data</code> script (which still reports <code>0 / 0</code> in the header block below because the
 data-download helper was not invoked for this run). Instead, evidence was gathered through two live channels
@@ -4282,7 +4282,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ingestion-mode">Ingestion mode<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 </ol>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a> §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation" for the
 audit of <strong>16 forward indicators carried forward from 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-18 (0 silent drops)</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts">Live MCP evidence base (cited across the 14 artefacts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts">Live MCP evidence base (cited across the 14 artefacts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4321,7 +4321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-live-mcp-evidence-base-cited-across-the-14-artefacts">Live MCP eviden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th>Unique <code>dok_id</code>s cited</th><th>Examples</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government propositions</strong></td><td>24</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03220, HD03229, HD03231, HD03232, HD03235, HD03237, HD03239, HD03240, HD03242, HD03244, HD03245, HD03246, HD03238, HD03241, HD03101, HD0398</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition motions</strong></td><td>15</td><td>HD024079, HD024082, HD024087, HD024088, HD024089, HD024091, HD024092, HD024097, HD024098</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee reports / vilande grundlag</strong></td><td>9</td><td>HD01UFöU3, HD01KU32, HD01KU33, HD01SfU20, HD01SfU22, HD01SkU23, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD01TU21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Parliamentary questions / interpellations</strong></td><td>13</td><td>HD10420, HD10430, HD10438, HD10427, HD10429, HD10431–HD10434</td></tr><tr><td><strong>JuU15 145–142 chamber vote</strong></td><td>1</td><td>JuU15 (2026-04-16) — working-majority discipline signature</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Total unique <code>dok_id</code> citations across the 14-artefact package: <strong>≥ 62</strong>. Complete list is machine-extractable via
 <code>grep -rhoE 'HD[0-9A-Za-zÖöÄäÅå]+' analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/*.md | sort -u</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested">Upstream sibling runs ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested">Upstream sibling runs ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4368,7 +4368,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-upstream-sibling-runs-ingested">Upstream sibling runs ingested<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Scope</th><th>Reconciled indicators</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/"><code>2026-04-18/weekly-review/</code></a></td><td>Full 14-artefact Tier-C exemplar</td><td>Scenario bands + 16 upstream watchpoints</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/evening-analysis/"><code>2026-04-18/evening-analysis/</code></a></td><td>Evening analysis</td><td>Working-day indicators</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/"><code>2026-04-18/realtime-1705/</code></a></td><td>Late-day realtime</td><td>End-of-day chamber state</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/week-ahead/"><code>2026-04-17/week-ahead/</code></a></td><td>Week-ahead forecast</td><td>Carries week-ahead vote calendar</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/"><code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></a></td><td>Afternoon realtime</td><td>Intraday committee signals</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-16/evening-analysis/"><code>2026-04-16/evening-analysis/</code></a></td><td>JuU15 145–142 vote</td><td>Vote-discipline signature baseline</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-15/evening-analysis/"><code>2026-04-15/evening-analysis/</code></a></td><td>Evening analysis</td><td>Pre-vote committee positioning</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-external-public-data-sources">External public-data sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-public-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-public-data-sources">External public-data sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-public-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4390,7 +4390,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-public-data-sources">External public-data sources<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>File</th><th>Scope</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>World Bank Open Data API</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/economic-data.json"><code>economic-data.json</code></a></td><td>Nordic GDP (NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG), unemployment (SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS), inflation (FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG) 2021–2025</td></tr><tr><td><code>data.riksdagen.se</code> calendar feeds</td><td>Live queries</td><td>Europe Day (9 May), FöU/EUN committee schedules, Open-House weekend (14–15 May)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run">Raw document download (data-only helper — not invoked for this aggregation run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run">Raw document download (data-only helper — not invoked for this aggregation run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregation-run"></a></h3>
 <p>The fields below are from the <code>download-parliamentary-data</code> helper. They are <code>0</code> because the aggregation
 workflow does not invoke that helper. This is <strong>not</strong> a data-quality issue — all cited evidence is sourced
 through the live MCP channel above and cross-referenced to the upstream sibling runs.</p>
@@ -4411,13 +4411,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-raw-document-download-data-only-helper--not-invoked-for-this-aggregat
 performed by the AI agent following <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using
 templates from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All <code>HD*</code> documents cited are sourced from the official <code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> API.</li>
 <li>Upstream synthesis follows the 14-day lookback policy for <code>month-ahead</code> per
 <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"RECENT DAILY KNOWLEDGE-BASE SYNTHESIS".</li>
 <li>Upstream watchpoint reconciliation is auditable: <strong>16 indicators in → 16 indicators reconciled →
 0 silent drops</strong> (see <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §"Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation").</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4455,7 +4472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:03.924Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:25.333Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html b/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html
index e985fbd318..be81056a7d 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Riksdag Monthly Review: April 2026 (Spring Term Peak)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.164Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.563Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.164Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.563Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Monthly Review: April 2026 (Spring Term Peak)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:04.164Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Monthly Review: April 2026 (Spring Term Peak)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:25.563Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts — 30-day retrospective</em>
 </p>
@@ -243,12 +243,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-M04 (Monthly-Review)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>PUBLIC · Time-to-read ≤ 5 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coverage Window</strong></td><td>2026-03-20 → 2026-04-19 (Riksmöte 2025/26, spring budget peak)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision spanning the pre-election 30 days</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>30 days · 90 days · post-Sep 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Author</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent · James Pether Sörling editorial responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 Rules 0–8 · Pass 2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Continuity</strong></td><td>Ingests 30 daily sibling runs + <code>weekly-review/2026-04-18</code> + <code>month-ahead/2026-04-19</code> (see <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>April 2026 was the single most electorally consequential month of the 2025/26 Riksdag session.</strong> The Tidö-koalitionen (M–SD–KD–L) under PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> and Finance Minister <strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong> concentrated its identity-defining legislation into a four-week pre-election sprint: the <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (Vårproposition <code>HD03100</code> + Vårändringsbudget <code>HD0399</code> + Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code> — fuel-tax cut 82 öre/litre + el/gas household relief, ≈ SEK 60 B net stimulus); a <strong>criminal-justice bloc</strong> (<code>HD03218</code> double penalties for criminal networks, <code>HD03217</code> extended civil-servant liability, <code>HD03246</code> stricter youth-offender rules, <code>HD03245</code> national men's-violence strategy, <code>HD03237</code> paid police education); a <strong>constitutional pair</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> media-accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> search-and-seizure of digital evidence — both declared <em>vilande</em>, requiring confirmation by the post-September-2026 Riksdag and thereby making the general election a <strong>de-facto referendum on constitutional change</strong>); a <strong>NATO operational first</strong> (<code>HD03220</code> Sweden's 1,200-troop contribution to Finnish NATO eFP — first Article-5-era force deployment to allied territory); an <strong>environmental-deregulation package</strong> (<code>HD03238</code> new permit authority, <code>HD03242</code> active forestry, <code>HD03239</code> wind-power municipal veto, <code>HD03240</code> new electricity-system law); and <strong>international-justice accession</strong> (<code>HD03231</code> Special Tribunal on Crime of Aggression against Ukraine + <code>HD03232</code> International Compensation Commission). Against <strong>0.82 % GDP growth 2024</strong> (vs DK 3.48 %, NO 2.10 %, FI 0.42 %; World Bank) and <strong>8.7 % unemployment 2025</strong>, the month crystallises a <strong>dual-positioning strategy</strong>: fiscal stimulus + toughness on crime/border for swing voters, constitutional + environmental deregulation for the coalition's right flank — with the <strong>women's-shelter closure interpellation <code>HD10438</code></strong> opening the central opposition attack vector. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Election-campaign coverage architecture</strong> (2026-05-01 → 2026-09-13)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §Three Base Scenarios + ACH grid · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> Top-14</td><td align="right">Now — before May-1 political holiday cycle</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom + constitutional-continuity editorial posture</strong> in light of KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> S2×T3 TOWS · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Nordic constitutional models · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R-06</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026) and first post-election Riksdag (2026-09-24)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-hybrid + ECHR-litigation threat monitoring posture</strong> given NATO operational footprint + migration tightening</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> TH-01 + TH-03 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R-01 + R-04</td><td align="right">Continuous; heightened 2026-Q3 (deployment window)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The lead story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (<code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> + <code>HD03236</code>). ≈ SEK 60 B net stimulus; 82 öre/litre fuel-tax cut; el/gas relief. Sweden's 0.82 % 2024 growth trails Nordics by <strong>2–3 percentage points</strong> — the trilogy is simultaneously counter-cyclical economics and pre-election household-relief politics. <strong>Q3-2026 macro data</strong> (the release just before the September vote) becomes the campaign's fiscal-credibility verdict. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>The constitutional story is the KU32/KU33 pair</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> media accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> digital-evidence search/seizure). <strong>Grundlag amendments require two identical Riksdag votes separated by a general election</strong> — the September-2026 campaign thereby becomes a de-facto referendum on narrowing <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766). Interpretive scope of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" in KU33 is the strategic centre of gravity. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met</strong>: all <strong>17 documents</strong> with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 receive dedicated treatment in the companion monthly article; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a>. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 5 ministers / party leaders with dok_id citations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 5 ministers / party leaders with dok_id citations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citati
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>dok_id Evidence</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader; trilogy + foreign-policy co-signatory</td><td>HD03100, HD03220, HD03231</td><td>Owns the fiscal + NATO + international-justice package</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, Finance)</td><td>Architect of Vårproposition + Extra budget</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Q3-2026 macro-release = legacy variable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, Justice)</td><td>KU33 + criminal-justice bloc owner</td><td>HD01KU33, HD03218, HD03246, HD03217</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning"; youth-offender execution</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson</strong> (M, Defence)</td><td>NATO eFP + Ukraine-tribunal pairing</td><td>HD03220, HD03231</td><td>Bn-task-group deployment 2026-Q3; operational NATO posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, Foreign)</td><td>Tribunal + reparations architect</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; norm-entrepreneurship dividend</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong> (KD, party leader, Energy)</td><td>Electricity-system law + coalition anchor</td><td>HD03240, HD03239</td><td>Underwrites energy trilogy + wind-power reform</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader, Labour)</td><td>Coalition partner most press-freedom sensitive</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33, HD10437</td><td>Watch for liberal-identity friction on KU33 + wage-transparency transposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong> (SD, party leader)</td><td>Parliamentary-support kingmaker</td><td>HD03218, HD03246</td><td>Crime-package political owner; migration-trio demands</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, opposition leader)</td><td>Counter-budget architect</td><td>HD10438 (shelter interpellation), counter-motions on HD03236</td><td>Position on KU33 second-reading = post-election swing factor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong> (S, finance spokesman)</td><td>S budget critique</td><td>Counter-motion to HD03100</td><td>Cost-of-living narrative construction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, party leader)</td><td>Anti-deregulation + anti-KU33 voice</td><td>Counter-motions to HD03242, HD03239</td><td>Left-bloc mobilisation architect</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate</td><td>Opposition filings to HD01KU32/33</td><td>Environmental + constitutional dual-axis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong> (C, party leader)</td><td>Centre-bloc swing</td><td>C budget-alternative</td><td>Migration counter-motion; coalition-formation pivot under Scenario C</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Micael Bydén</strong> (ÖB, Försvarsmakten)</td><td>Operational owner for eFP deployment</td><td>HD03220</td><td>Bn-task-group readiness Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Collective)</td><td>Constitutional review body</td><td>Pending KU32/KU33 yttrande</td><td>Single most consequential upcoming institutional signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers">🗓 Forward Vote Calendar (Next 90 Days — with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers">🗓 Forward Vote Calendar (Next 90 Days — with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers">🗓 Forward Vote
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code></td><td>Confirms fiscal-package coherence; bloc-vote stress-test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-27</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>First post-Easter political-accountability drumbeat</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early May 2026</strong></td><td>Vote on <code>HD03218</code> double-penalty law</td><td>Bloc-vote prediction: 145–147 for, SD kingmaker visibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mid May 2026</strong></td><td>Vote on <code>HD03242</code> active forestry + <code>HD03239</code> wind veto</td><td>V + MP + S co-ordinated no-vote; EU-friction escalator</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2 2026</strong> (April–June)</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict language ⇒ R-06 ↓ 4; silent ⇒ R-06 ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td><td><em>Kammarvote</em> (vilande beslut) on KU33/KU32 first reading</td><td>First-reading confirmation — second reading in post-election Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late May / June 2026</strong></td><td>Chamber vote on <code>HD03231</code> + <code>HD03232</code> tribunal/reparations</td><td>Cross-party ≈ 349 MPs; no direct Swedish fiscal burden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>June 2026</strong></td><td>EU Commission response to forestry package</td><td>Environmental-compliance trigger for R-02</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-Q3</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deploys to Finland</td><td>First operational NATO-posture milestone</td></tr><tr><td><strong>July–August 2026</strong></td><td>Women's-shelter emergency-funding decision (expected)</td><td>S attack-line intensity modulator</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>V + C + MP file ECHR challenge on migration trio + civil-servant liability</td><td>Migration-trio durability test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Continuous (heightened)</strong></td><td>SÄPO + MSB hybrid-threat bulletins</td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators (R-01)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-13</strong></td><td>Swedish general election</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects (<code>scenario-analysis.md</code> priors)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-24</strong></td><td>First post-election Riksdag</td><td>KU32/KU33 confirmation window opens</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from <cod
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare retaliation</strong> post-eFP + tribunal accession</td><td align="center">20 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td><td>SÄPO/MSB heightened posture; Nordic-Baltic intel-sharing; civil-society resilience</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>EU Commission infringement</strong> on HD03242 forestry + HD03239 wind-veto</td><td align="center">16 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td>Pre-notification to DG ENV; species-inventory compromise (Finland model)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> (interpretive frontier)</td><td align="center">15 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO remissvar; statutory clarity in 2nd reading</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Migration trio + civil-servant liability ECHR strike-down</strong></td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Government legal review; appeal-mechanism build-out; UNHCR consultation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Women's-shelter crisis politicisation without funding resolution</strong></td><td align="center">10 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Emergency-budget supplemental; coordinated municipal-state response</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-opportunities">🎯 Top-5 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-opportunities">🎯 Top-5 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-opportunities">🎯 Top-5 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneurship dividend</strong> from Ukraine tribunal — Sweden positions as Nordic international-justice leader</td><td>HD03231 + CoE framework</td><td align="center">Decadal</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Cross-party constitutional statesmanship</strong> on KU33 if S endorses Norway-style statutory triggers (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Nordic models)</td><td>HD01KU33 + Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>NATO-integration reputational capital</strong> if eFP deployment proceeds without incidents</td><td>HD03220 + Försvarsmakten readiness</td><td align="center">2026-Q3/Q4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>Coalition-stability narrative</strong> if Spring Trilogy executes without further close votes</td><td>Voteringsregister + macro indicators</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>EU climate-leadership recovery path</strong> via forestry compromise (Finland Natura-2000 precedent)</td><td>HD03242 revision</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -623,22 +623,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (fiscal trilogy + electoral balance)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>Sensitivity analysis confirms top rank under 5 weight variations</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>All 17 documents with weighted ≥ 7.0 covered</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center">🟩 <strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>JuU-style bloc votes operationally validated; SD discipline zero-defection pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election KU33 second-reading outcome</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on Sep-2026 composition — three plausible coalitions (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP + tribunal; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission forestry-package response</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Finland precedent informs likely compromise path</td></tr><tr><td>Women's-shelter funding resolution pre-election</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Political-cost calculus uncertain; S attack-vector durability visible</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR ruling on migration trio</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Counter-motion text shows preparedness; Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md">Data Manifest</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-19 (monthly cadence) or event-driven on Lagrådet KU33 yttrande · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 · <strong>Upstream Continuity Contract</strong>: <code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26<br>
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: AI Political Intelligence (Pass 2 — iteratively improved)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>April 2026 marks one of the most legislatively intensive months of the 2025/26 parliamentary session. The Tidö-koalitionen government (M–SD–KD–L) tabled its <strong>spring budget package</strong> — including an extra change budget cutting fuel taxes and introducing energy price support — against a backdrop of a Swedish economy growing at a modest 0.82% in 2024, far below Denmark's 3.5%. Simultaneously, a sweeping criminal justice overhaul emerged as the session's defining domestic theme, with three major bills targeting criminal networks, youth offenders, and civil servant accountability. Environmental governance was substantially restructured through a new environmental permit authority and active forestry deregulation. The month's activity provides a clear electoral positioning signal ahead of the September 2026 Riksdag election.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological">Key Legislative Developments (Chronological)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological">Key Legislative Developments (Chronological)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title April 2026 Legislative Calendar
     section March 20–31
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological">Key Legislative Developme
         HD10437 : Interpellation — wage transparency directive
         HD10438 : Interpellation — women's shelter closures</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monthly-legislative-statistics">Monthly Legislative Statistics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-legislative-statistics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monthly-legislative-statistics">Monthly Legislative Statistics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-legislative-statistics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-monthly-legislative-statistics">Monthly Legislative Statistics<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th>Count</th><th>Trend vs. Prior Month</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Total propositioner (session)</td><td>272</td><td>↑ +30 since March 12</td></tr><tr><td>Total betankanden fetched</td><td>50</td><td>Spring peak</td></tr><tr><td>Total motioner (session)</td><td>4,098</td><td>Active opposition cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Interpellationer filed (last 30 days)</td><td>41</td><td>↑ High opposition scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td>Written questions (last 30 days)</td><td>~80 est.</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional amendments (vilande)</td><td>2</td><td>Notable</td></tr><tr><td>Budget propositions tabled</td><td>4</td><td>Spring budget package</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-dominant-policy-themes">Dominant Policy Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dominant-policy-themes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dominant-policy-themes">Dominant Policy Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dominant-policy-themes"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((April 2026 Parliament))
     FISCAL POLICY
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-dominant-policy-themes">Dominant Policy Themes<a class="" aria-hidden
       Ukraine tribunal HD03231
       Arms export HD03114</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days">Party Activity Analysis (Last 30 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days">Party Activity Analysis (Last 30 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -815,44 +815,44 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days">Party Activity Analysis (Last 3
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Notable Actions</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>M</strong> (Moderaterna)</td><td>Government lead</td><td>Budget leadership, energy/climate</td><td>Central to coalition cohesion</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong> (Sverigedemokraterna)</td><td>Government partner</td><td>Crime legislation, deportation</td><td>Pushed double-penalty criminal bill</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong> (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td>Government support</td><td>Social policy, civil services</td><td>Guardianship reform support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong> (Liberalerna)</td><td>Government support</td><td>E-ID, transparency, gender equality</td><td>Wage transparency questioned</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong> (Socialdemokraterna)</td><td>Main opposition</td><td>25+ interpellations, women's shelters</td><td>Active legislative scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Social insurance, forestry opposition</td><td>Voted against forestry bill</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong> (Centerpartiet)</td><td>Mixed/constructive</td><td>E-ID support, NATO presence</td><td>Supported key security bills</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> (Miljöpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Anti-fuel-tax cut, environment</td><td>Opposed extra budget HD03236</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's economy grew at <strong>0.82%</strong> in 2024 — recovering from a -0.20% contraction in 2023 but significantly trailing Denmark (<strong>3.5%</strong>), Norway (<strong>2.1%</strong>), and the EU average. Unemployment hit <strong>8.7%</strong> in 2025, among the highest in the Nordic region. Inflation fell dramatically to <strong>2.84%</strong> in 2024 from a crisis peak of 8.55% in 2023. GDP per capita reached <strong>USD 57,117</strong> in 2024.</p>
 <p>The government's extra change budget (HD03236) cutting fuel taxes and providing energy support directly responds to household cost pressures — a clear electoral move with only five months to the September 2026 vote.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-tiers">Significance Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-tiers"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-1--national-significance">Tier 1 — National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--national-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-tiers">Significance Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-tiers"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-1--national-significance">Tier 1 — National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--national-significance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03100</strong> Spring Proposition 2026 — frames entire government economic strategy</li>
 <li><strong>HD03236</strong> Extra budget — fuel taxes + energy support (immediate household impact)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03218</strong> Double penalties for criminal networks (major criminal justice reform)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03220</strong> NATO Finland contribution (national security commitment)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-2--major-policy">Tier 2 — Major Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--major-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-2--major-policy">Tier 2 — Major Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--major-policy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03238</strong> New environmental permit authority (institutional restructuring)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03245</strong> National violence against women strategy</li>
 <li><strong>HD03217</strong> Extended civil servant criminal liability</li>
 <li><strong>HD03246</strong> Stricter youth offender rules</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical">Tier 3 — Procedural/Technical<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical">Tier 3 — Procedural/Technical<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28</strong> National condominium register</li>
 <li><strong>HD01CU27</strong> Property identity requirements</li>
 <li><strong>HD01KU32/33</strong> Constitutional changes (vilande — require post-election confirmation)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Budget season with fuel tax cuts is clearly electorally motivated. The September 2026 election means every major legislative action from April through September carries campaign weight.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM confidence — Current coalition appears stable. SD's crime agenda being legislated keeps SD aligned. L's support for e-ID and digital transparency pleases liberals. Risk: MP and V energized by environmental rollbacks could galvanize left-green voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Crime (double penalties) and cost of living (fuel tax) are polling as top concerns. Women's shelter crisis (HD10438) creates visible S ammunition.</p>
 <p><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — Government exposed on: (1) women's shelter closures, (2) sluggish economic growth vs. Nordic peers, (3) active forestry deregulation facing environmental opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong>: 🟦 VERY HIGH confidence that this spring session shapes the campaign agenda: the government has staked its identity on crime reduction and economic relief.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>Significance scored on three dimensions:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Legislative Impact</strong> (0-10): Constitutional/structural vs. procedural/technical</li>
@@ -861,14 +861,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 </ul>
 <p>Final score = weighted average (0.4 × Legislative + 0.3 × Public + 0.3 × Electoral)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-15-documents-by-significance">Top 15 Documents by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-15-documents-by-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-15-documents-by-significance">Top 15 Documents by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-15-documents-by-significance"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Document Significance Scores (Top 10)"
     x-axis ["HD03100", "HD03236", "HD03218", "HD03220", "HD03245", "HD03246", "HD03238", "HD10438", "HD03242", "HD03217"]
     y-axis "Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [9.2, 9.0, 8.8, 8.3, 8.1, 8.0, 7.5, 7.4, 7.2, 7.1]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-scores">Detailed Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-scores">Detailed Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-detailed-scores">Detailed Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Legislative</th><th>Public</th><th>Electoral</th><th>Final</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.2</strong></td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.8</strong></td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td>7</td><td><strong>8.1</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.5</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>4</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.4</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.2</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.1</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>4</td><td><strong>5.8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>7</td><td>5</td><td>3</td><td><strong>5.2</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>5.2</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>4</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>5.2</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>5.1</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monthly-significance-index">Monthly Significance Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-significance-index"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monthly-significance-index">Monthly Significance Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-significance-index"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>This month's significance level</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (score: 8.1/10)</p>
 <p><strong>Factors elevating significance</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -1027,12 +1027,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-monthly-significance-index">Monthly Significance Index<a class="" ari
 <li>April 2026: HIGH (8.1) — spring peak ✓</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Minimum perspectives required</strong>: 7 (deep depth)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((April 2026 Stakeholders))
     Government Coalition
@@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
       Trafficking Victims
       Condominium Owners</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl">Perspective 1: Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl">Perspective 1: Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Satisfied with April productivity<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Electoral positioning, crime reduction, fiscal prudence with relief<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: The spring package delivers on all four coalition partners' priority lists:</p>
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl">Perspective 1: Government
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: Moderate voters relieved by fuel tax cuts; conservative base satisfied with crime bills<br>
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Women's shelter crisis creates visible S attack surface that KD in particular may find uncomfortable given its Christian social values platform</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s">Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s">Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Actively confrontational but constructive on security<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Welfare state integrity, workers' rights, regional equity<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: S is in effective pre-campaign mode. The 25+ interpellations in 30 days — on topics ranging from women's shelters (HD10438) to the Folke Bernadotte murder anniversary (HD10435) to housing in Stockholm (HD10434) to broad tax reform (HD10433) — constitute a deliberate narrative-building exercise. S supported NATO Finland contribution (HD03220) bipartisanly, demonstrating security credibility.</p>
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s">Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: Core S message: "Government builds prisons while closing shelters"<br>
 <strong>Vulnerability</strong>: S must distance from perceived economic incompetence of 2021–2022 inflation surge under their watch</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd">Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd">Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Delivering on core programme through coalition<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Crime reduction, immigration restriction, national security<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: SD's legislative fingerprints are visible on two flagship bills: double penalties for criminal networks (HD03218) and stricter youth offender rules (HD03246). Both were SD priorities in coalition negotiations. The interpellation on mosque extremism (HD10430) signals SD continuing to shape the debate agenda from inside the coalition orbit.</p>
@@ -1094,28 +1094,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd">Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (S
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: SD consolidating right-of-centre crime voters; risk of losing voters to KD on social issues if welfare state perception hardens<br>
 <strong>Risk</strong>: September election polling will determine whether SD holds current ~20% share or loses ground to M</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c">Perspective 4: Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c">Perspective 4: Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Selective constructive opposition<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Rural business, entrepreneurship, personal liberty, NATO<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: C supported the NATO Finland contribution (HD03220) and the e-ID initiative (TU21) but has expressed reservations about active forestry deregulation details and women's shelter closures. C's positioning as a "liberal conscience" of Swedish politics means it is increasingly differentiating from both the government coalition and the S-led opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: Interpellations on international LGBTQ+ rights (HD10431 from C), constructive security votes<br>
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: C aims to recover from 2022 below-4% scare; rural business voters attracted by forestry deregulation</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp">Perspective 5: Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp">Perspective 5: Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Principled opposition on environment and climate<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Green transition, social justice, EU alignment<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: MP filed a motion directly opposing the extra budget fuel tax cut (HD024098), positioning itself as the uncompromising green option. MP's parliamentary group voted against the active forestry bill and the renewable energy permit changes. This positions MP to capture protest votes from climate-motivated centre-left voters who feel S has compromised too much on environment.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: HD024098 (motion opposing fuel tax cut), consistent committee votes against deregulation<br>
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: MP needs to reach 4% threshold in September 2026 — green mobilisation depends on environment being top-of-mind for voters</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv">Perspective 6: Business Community / Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv">Perspective 6: Business Community / Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Generally supportive of April package<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Regulatory simplification, digital infrastructure, labour market flexibility<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: The business community welcomes the new environmental permit agency (HD03238) if it genuinely reduces permitting backlogs (currently 3–5 years for major industrial projects). The data interoperability proposition (HD03244) is welcomed as reducing administrative burden. Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) benefits timber companies. Energy price support (HD03236) reduces operational cost pressure.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: HD03238 (permit agency), HD03244 (interoperability), HD03240 (electricity law)<br>
 <strong>Concern</strong>: Double civil servant liability (HD03217) creates regulatory uncertainty for public procurement interactions</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations">Perspective 7: Women's Rights and Civil Society Organisations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations">Perspective 7: Women's Rights and Civil Society Organisations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Alarmed — between legislative progress and implementation failures<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Protection funding, wage equality, violence prevention<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: April 2026 presents a cruel paradox for women's rights advocates: the government tabled a National Strategy against Men's Violence (HD03245) on April 14 while women's shelters are closing across the country (interpellation HD10438 filed April 17). Wage transparency directive progress (interpellation HD10437) is stalled. The tax authority demanding back-taxes from trafficking victims (HD11719) represents a systemic failure of state protection.</p>
@@ -1123,14 +1123,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations">Perspect
 <strong>Demand</strong>: Ring-fenced funding in autumn budget for shelter operations; immediate halt to prosecution of trafficking victims for tax arrears<br>
 <strong>Electoral mobilisation</strong>: High potential — women's rights issues have strong social media resonance; S and MP will amplify</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner">Perspective 8: Swedish Local Government / SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner">Perspective 8: Swedish Local Government / SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Concerned about unfunded mandates and service withdrawals<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Municipal finance, service delivery standards, regional development<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: Multiple April propositions create implementation challenges for municipalities: paid police training (HD03237) requires coordination, new reception law (HD03229 — motions HD024080-89) imposes integration obligations, national violence strategy requires local co-funding. HD11718 (state service withdrawal from southeastern Skåne) illustrates the broader problem of national government retreating from peripheral communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: HD11718 (Skåne service withdrawal), HD024080-89 (reception law motions), HD01CU22 (guardianship — local authority implications)<br>
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Municipal election results in 2026 may see urban-rural divide exploited by all parties</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>File-ID</strong></td><td>SCN-2026-M04</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td><code>monthly-review</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Horizon</strong></td><td>30 days · 90 days · post-Sep 2026 election (13-month look-forward)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) · probability bands · monitoring-trigger calendar</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Probability Anchor</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-framework-overview">Framework Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framework-overview">Framework Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A[April 2026 Legislative Cluster&#x3C;br/>Spring Trilogy + Crime Bloc + KU32/33 + NATO eFP + Env Deregulation] --> T1{30-day Trigger&#x3C;br/>Lagrådet KU33 yttrande}
     A --> T2{90-day Trigger&#x3C;br/>EU Commission forestry response}
@@ -1181,8 +1181,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-framework-overview">Framework Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     S_C --> O_C[Budget STALEMATE · KU32/33 LAPSES · Crime MAINTAINED]</pre>
 <p>Probabilities sum to 100 % (three base scenarios) + wildcard overlays; aligned to the weekly-review anchor (2026-04-18) with the monthly-scope adjustment noted in the ACH grid below.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium">Scenario A — Tidö-koalitionen Re-elected (Probability: <strong>42 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability">Trigger conditions (signals that raise this scenario's probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium">Scenario A — Tidö-koalitionen Re-elected (Probability: <strong>42 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability">Trigger conditions (signals that raise this scenario's probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Opinion polls retain M+SD+KD+L ≥ 175 seats by August 2026</li>
 <li>Q3-2026 macro release shows GDP growth ≥ 1.5 % (vs 0.82 % 2024)</li>
@@ -1190,33 +1190,33 @@ <h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability">Tri
 <li>No major SÄPO-acknowledged Russian hybrid incident</li>
 <li>Fuel-tax cut <code>HD03236</code> reaches households before August 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> + <code>HD03236</code> clear chamber (2026-04-22 Extra budget vote passes bloc-vote 175–174)</li>
 <li><code>HD03218</code> double-penalty law passes first reading with expected SD-kingmaker discipline</li>
 <li><code>HD10438</code> women's-shelter interpellation answered without emergency supplemental</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Lagrådet KU33 yttrande <strong>silent</strong> on narrow interpretation → government proceeds unchanged</li>
 <li><code>HD03242</code> active forestry: EU Commission issues letter-of-formal-notice; government defends on subsidiarity</li>
 <li><code>HD03220</code> NATO eFP Bn-task-group deploys to Finland (July 2026) without incident</li>
 <li><code>HD03231</code> / <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission: chamber approval with ≥ 300 MPs</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>KU32/KU33 <strong>CONFIRMED</strong> in second reading by new Riksdag (bloc vote ≥ 175)</li>
 <li>Tidöavtalet 2.0 negotiations open — expanded deportation + migration-tightening mandate</li>
 <li><code>HD03218</code> expanded to additional offence categories by end-2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Raise probability to 50 %+</strong> if: Q2 inflation &#x3C; 2.5 % AND unemployment &#x3C; 8.5 % AND no SÄPO hybrid incident</li>
 <li><strong>Lower probability to 35 %</strong> if: shelter crisis unresolved AND V+MP+S cross-party motion wins C swing vote</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium">Scenario B — S-led Government (Probability: <strong>33 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium">Scenario B — S-led Government (Probability: <strong>33 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-conditions">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S regains ≥ 30 % polling (from ≈ 26 % April 2026 baseline)</li>
 <li>Women's-shelter crisis (<code>HD10438</code>) dominates August campaign coverage</li>
@@ -1224,19 +1224,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>C refuses to enter Tidö-koalitionen after the election</li>
 <li>V delivers parliamentary support tolerance (confidence-and-supply, not formal coalition)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S + V + MP + C coordinated motion on women's-shelter emergency funding tests coalition discipline</li>
 <li>S files counter-motion to <code>HD03236</code> reframing fuel-tax cut as regressive household-transfer</li>
 <li>Magdalena Andersson leverages HD10438 as campaign-defining attack vector</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S tables comprehensive counter-budget for 2027 (pre-election)</li>
 <li>Forestry <code>HD03242</code> passes but V + MP mobilisation becomes organising framework for the left bloc</li>
 <li><code>HD03217</code> civil-servant liability becomes union/LO mobilisation vector</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU32/KU33 FAIL</strong> second reading — grundlag change lapses (political cost: zero; status quo ante)</li>
 <li><code>HD03242</code> active forestry <strong>REVERSED</strong> — species-inventory compromise (Finland model)</li>
@@ -1246,26 +1246,26 @@ <h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1">Post-election policy tra
 <li>Criminal-justice bloc (<code>HD03218</code> + <code>HD03246</code>) <strong>maintained</strong> — cross-party support (rehabilitation supplements added)</li>
 <li>NATO commitments (<code>HD03220</code>) <strong>maintained</strong> — bipartisan foreign-policy consensus since 2024</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Raise probability to 40 %+</strong> if: shelter crisis × fuel-tax regressivity attack-line breaks through by July</li>
 <li><strong>Lower probability to 25 %</strong> if: Q3-2026 macro outperforms + no new hybrid incident</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low">Scenario C — Hung Parliament / Coalition Negotiations (Probability: <strong>22 %</strong> · Confidence 🟥 LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions-1">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low">Scenario C — Hung Parliament / Coalition Negotiations (Probability: <strong>22 %</strong> · Confidence 🟥 LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-conditions-1">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Neither Tidö-bloc nor S+V+MP+C coalition clears 175 seats</li>
 <li>SD strong enough (≥ 22 %) to demand formal government role; C refuses</li>
 <li>L drops below 4 % threshold (coalition-arithmetic shock)</li>
 <li>Novus + SIFO average within ± 3 points of both blocs in the final week</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign">30-day policy trajectory (during election campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign">30-day policy trajectory (during election campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>All major legislative files proceed — campaign-trail coverage intensifies, chamber behaviour unchanged</li>
 <li>Parties position for post-election negotiating leverage</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026–Dec 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026–Dec 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Budget-negotiation stalemate consumes Q4 2026 — statsminister-omröstning may require 3–5 attempts</li>
 <li><code>HD03218</code> criminal-network law already enacted pre-election — <strong>MAINTAINED</strong> (cross-party consensus)</li>
@@ -1274,13 +1274,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026">Post-election polic
 <li>Women's-shelter emergency funding passed as <strong>coalition-formation concession</strong> (likely)</li>
 <li><code>HD03231</code> / <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal accession <strong>MAINTAINED</strong> — cross-party</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Raise probability to 30 %+</strong> if: L drops below 4 % in August polling AND C publicly rules out both blocs</li>
 <li><strong>Lower probability to 15 %</strong> if: one bloc consolidates > 47 % polling by early September</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high">Wildcard W-1 — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Escalation (Probability: <strong>8 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high">Wildcard W-1 — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Escalation (Probability: <strong>8 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: SÄPO-confirmed major cyber/hybrid incident attributable to Russia, timed to:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>The 2026-Q3 Bn-task-group deployment to Finland, OR</li>
@@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impac
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Monitoring triggers</strong>: SÄPO quarterly-threat-assessment publication; MSB annual resilience-audit; Försvarsmakten signals-intelligence bulletins (unclass.)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high">Wildcard W-2 — Early Election / No-Confidence Vote (Probability: <strong>5 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high">Wildcard W-2 — Early Election / No-Confidence Vote (Probability: <strong>5 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: Coalition partner (most likely L given press-freedom / KU33 tensions) withdraws support on a specific grundlag paragraph → cabinet-confidence test.</p>
 <p><strong>Impact on scenarios</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impa
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Monitoring triggers</strong>: Public L party-board statements on KU33 interpretation; Lagrådet yttrande language; any L minister resignation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h3>
 <p>Legend: ✅ consistent · ⚠️ ambiguous · ❌ inconsistent</p>
 
 
@@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence (April 2026)</th><th align="center">H-A: Tidö re-elected</th><th align="center">H-B: S-led</th><th align="center">H-C: Hung</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Spring fuel-tax cut <code>HD03236</code> tabled 4 weeks before poll window</td><td align="center">✅ (household relief)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (attackable as regressive)</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>HD03236</td></tr><tr><td>Women's-shelter closures + <code>HD10438</code> interpellation filed</td><td align="center">⚠️ (attackable)</td><td align="center">✅ (campaign vector)</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>41 interpellations / 30 days — highest monthly rate of session</td><td align="center">⚠️ (opposition energy signal)</td><td align="center">✅ (scrutiny capacity)</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>Interpellations log</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal-justice bloc operational, SD-aligned</td><td align="center">✅ (SD-loyalty reward)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (cross-party acceptance)</td><td align="center">✅ (crime cross-party)</td><td>HD03218/HD03246/HD03217</td></tr><tr><td>NATO operational deployment <code>HD03220</code></td><td align="center">✅ (security-competence)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (maintained but not owned)</td><td align="center">✅ (cross-party)</td><td>HD03220</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal <code>HD03231</code> + reparations <code>HD03232</code></td><td align="center">✅ (norm entrepreneurship)</td><td align="center">✅ (S-compatible)</td><td align="center">✅ (cross-party)</td><td>HD03231/HD03232</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental deregulation package (forestry/wind/permit/electricity)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (left-bloc mobiliser)</td><td align="center">✅ (opposition organising frame)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (stalls in coalition negotiations)</td><td>HD03238/39/40/42</td></tr><tr><td>KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em> → election as referendum</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌ (coalition-arithmetic breaks)</td><td>HD01KU32/33</td></tr><tr><td>GDP 0.82 % 2024 vs Nordics 2–3.5 %</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment 8.7 % 2025</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation 2.84 % 2024 (stabilised from 8.55 %)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>L declining polling + press-freedom friction</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅ (trigger for W-2)</td><td>Opinion polls + KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>ACH inconsistency count</strong> (❌): H-A = 0 · H-B = 1 · H-C = 2 → <strong>H-B most internally consistent with April-2026 evidence</strong>, but <strong>H-A has highest prior</strong> from coalition-discipline voting record; net probability favours H-A by a narrow margin (≈ 9 points) — consistent with the 42 % / 33 % / 22 % base.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">Monitoring-Tri
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Trigger Event</th><th>Scenario Shift Rules</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Chamber vote on <code>HD03236</code> Extra budget</td><td>Pass 175–174 bloc vote → H-A ↑ 2 · Pass with defections → H-C ↑ 3</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-27</td><td>KU annual granskning open</td><td>Major disclosure → H-B ↑ 3</td></tr><tr><td>Early May</td><td><code>HD03218</code> double-penalty first-reading vote</td><td>SD-kingmaker visibility → H-A ↑ 1</td></tr><tr><td>Mid May</td><td><code>HD03242</code> forestry first-reading</td><td>Pass with L defection → H-C ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet KU33 yttrande</strong></td><td>Strict → H-B ↑ 5 · Silent → H-A ↑ 3 · Ambiguous → H-C ↑ 2</td></tr><tr><td>Late May</td><td>Q1-2026 macro release (SCB)</td><td>GDP > 1.5 % → H-A ↑ 3 · &#x3C; 0.5 % → H-B ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>June 2026</td><td>EU Commission forestry letter-of-formal-notice</td><td>Issued → H-B ↑ 2 + W-1 no-change</td></tr><tr><td>June 2026</td><td><strong>Chamber vote HD03231/HD03232</strong></td><td>Cross-party ≥ 300 MPs → H-A/B/C all stable</td></tr><tr><td>July 2026</td><td>Women's-shelter emergency-funding decision</td><td>Funded → H-A ↑ 2 · Refused → H-B ↑ 5</td></tr><tr><td>2026-Q3</td><td>eFP Bn-task-group deployment start</td><td>Incident-free → H-A ↑ 2 · Incident → W-1 triggered</td></tr><tr><td>August 2026</td><td>Q2 2026 macro release</td><td>GDP > 1.7 % → H-A ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>Early Sep</td><td>Final-week polling Novus + SIFO</td><td>Within ± 3 both blocs → H-C ↑ 6</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td><strong>Election Day</strong></td><td>Result crystallises H-A/B/C</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-24</td><td>First post-election Riksdag</td><td>KU32/33 confirmation window opens — H-A → CONFIRMED, H-B/C → LAPSES</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Probability bands <strong>aligned</strong> to <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> base of 45 % / 35 % / 20 %, adjusted to <strong>42 % / 33 % / 22 %</strong> on the monthly scope reflecting: (a) visible shelter-crisis attack-vector maturation (H-B +1), (b) arithmetic widening for hung-parliament (H-C +2), (c) corresponding H-A narrowing (-3). Every departure justified per <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"Probability alignment".</li>
 <li>Wildcards <strong>inherited</strong> from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> with monthly-scope probability adjustment (W-1: 6 % → 8 %; W-2: 4 % → 5 %) as eFP-deployment window approaches.</li>
@@ -1497,19 +1497,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" a
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence Assessment</strong>: Base-scenario probabilities — 🟧 MEDIUM · Wildcards — 🟥 LOW (inherent tail-risk uncertainty) · Monitoring triggers — 🟩 HIGH (calendar anchored to concrete procedural events).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Risk Framework</strong>: NIST CSF / Political Risk Matrix</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Political Risk Matrix — April 2026"
     x-axis ["Very Low", "Low", "Medium", "High", "Very High"]
     y-axis "Impact Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [1, 3, 6, 9, 8]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1605,18 +1605,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk Description</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>Score</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01</td><td>Coalition fracture before Sept 2026 election</td><td>LOW</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>6/10</td><td>Crime/budget package unifies coalition</td></tr><tr><td>R-02</td><td>Economic growth stall — GDP below 1% in 2025</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>7/10</td><td>Extra budget stimulus; Riksbank rate policy</td></tr><tr><td>R-03</td><td>Women's shelter crisis escalation — media pressure</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>7/10</td><td>National violence strategy (HD03245) announced</td></tr><tr><td>R-04</td><td>Environmental EU infringement (forestry HD03242)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>7/10</td><td>Monitoring EU reaction; legal review</td></tr><tr><td>R-05</td><td>NATO Finland cost overrun (HD03220)</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td>5/10</td><td>Budget allocation in vårändringsbudget</td></tr><tr><td>R-06</td><td>Youth offender recidivism despite HD03246</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5/10</td><td>Rehabilitation components in bill</td></tr><tr><td>R-07</td><td>Constitutional change (HD01KU32/33) rejection post-election</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td><td>4/10</td><td>Vilande process requires new parliament confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>R-08</td><td>Digital infrastructure security (e-ID, HD03244)</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td>5/10</td><td>Government security review; NCSC oversight</td></tr><tr><td>R-09</td><td>Wage transparency non-compliance (HD10437)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5/10</td><td>EU enforcement mechanism still being finalised</td></tr><tr><td>R-10</td><td>Regional service withdrawal backlash (HD11718)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td><td>4/10</td><td>Limited political capital to reverse</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-risk-analysis">Top Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall">R-02: Economic Growth Stall<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-risk-analysis">Top Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall">R-02: Economic Growth Stall<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth at 0.82% in 2024 recovering from -0.20% contraction is fragile. Unemployment at 8.7% in 2025 exceeds the Nordic average. The extra budget fuel tax cut (HD03236) is a short-term stimulus that does not address structural competitiveness gaps. If the Riksbank holds rates elevated into Q3 2026, housing investment and consumer spending may remain suppressed through the election.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 45% | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: GDP below 0.5% in 2025 triggers fiscal stimulus debate</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis">R-03: Women's Shelter Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis">R-03: Women's Shelter Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis"></a></h4>
 <p>The interpellation on women's shelter closures (HD10438) from S signals a politically charged welfare issue. Dozens of shelters across Sweden have closed due to municipal funding cuts. The national violence strategy (HD03245) passed in April but is a framework without immediate ring-fenced funding. Social media amplification potential is high.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 70% | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: Major opposition campaign issue from May–September 2026</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement">R-04: EU Environmental Infringement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement">R-04: EU Environmental Infringement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement"></a></h4>
 <p>Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) removing restrictions on clear-cutting and species protection in productive forests risks EU Taxonomy non-compliance and potential infringement proceedings under the EU Biodiversity Strategy. Sweden's forestry industry generates approximately 3% of GDP — conflict between economic and environmental interests.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 35% | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: EU formal notice, international reputation damage</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-stability-assessment">Political Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-stability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-stability-assessment">Political Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-stability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gauge
     title "Coalition Stability Index — April 2026"
     accDescr "Coalition stability measured 0-100"
@@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-stability-assessment">Political Stability Assessment<a clas
     "Stability" : 72</pre>
 <p><strong>Overall assessment</strong>: Coalition STABLE through election. Budget discipline, crime agenda alignment, and electoral incentives keep M–SD–KD–L unified. Primary risk is any SD demand that L or KD cannot accept in the final pre-election session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale">Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale">Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1660,12 +1660,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale">Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assessment Area</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative volume assessment</td><td>🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Economic trend analysis</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral impact predictions</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>EU compliance risks</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition stability 6-month</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election scenarios</td><td>🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep (5+ stakeholder perspectives per quadrant)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix-overview">SWOT Matrix Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix-overview">SWOT Matrix Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT — Swedish Parliament April 2026
     x-axis Negative --> Positive
@@ -1683,8 +1683,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-matrix-overview">SWOT Matrix Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     Green Transition Investment: [0.70, 0.28]
     Election 2026 Pressure: [0.35, 0.22]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective">1. Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective">1. Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Delivered a comprehensive spring budget package (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236) on schedule</li>
 <li>Criminal justice reform (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217) demonstrates legislative discipline across coalition partners</li>
@@ -1692,125 +1692,125 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective">1. Government Coalition (M
 <li>New environmental agency (HD03238) signals institutional modernisation while controlling environmental costs</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: 272 propositions in 2025/26 session; HD03236 passed FiU by April 14</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective">2. Opposition Parties (S, V, MP Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective">2. Opposition Parties (S, V, MP Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Social Democrats produced 25+ interpellations in 30 days demonstrating active parliamentary scrutiny</li>
 <li>Women's shelter closures (HD10438) and wage transparency (HD10437) create high-visibility attack vectors</li>
 <li>MP successfully branded extra budget (HD03236) as anti-climate, mobilising green base</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024098 (MP motion against fuel tax cut), HD10437–HD10438 (S interpellations)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-democratic-institutions">3. Democratic Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-democratic-institutions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-democratic-institutions">3. Democratic Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-democratic-institutions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Constitutional amendments properly processed as "vilande" (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) — system integrity maintained</li>
 <li>Committee system processed 50 betankanden in the spring surge without backlog</li>
 <li>Property rights strengthened: condominium register (HD01CU28) and ID requirements (HD01CU27) improve housing market transparency</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-economic-policy-framework">4. Economic Policy Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-economic-policy-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-economic-policy-framework">4. Economic Policy Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-economic-policy-framework"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Inflation reduced from 8.5% (2023) to 2.84% (2024) — monetary policy normalising</li>
 <li>GDP per capita at USD 57,117 — solid base despite slow growth</li>
 <li>Energy price support mechanism (HD03236) provides household relief amid elevated energy costs</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-digital-governance">5. Digital Governance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-digital-governance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-digital-governance">5. Digital Governance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-digital-governance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>State e-ID bill (TU21) passed — major milestone for digital public services</li>
 <li>Data interoperability for public sector (HD03244) modernises government infrastructure</li>
 <li>Both initiatives align with EU Digital Single Market requirements</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective">1. Economic Performance (Citizen/Household Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective">1. Economic Performance (Citizen/Household Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>GDP growth at 0.82% (2024) severely lags Denmark (3.5%), Norway (2.1%), and EU average</li>
 <li>Unemployment at 8.7% (2025) — highest in five years, disproportionately affecting youth</li>
 <li>Fuel tax cut in extra budget is fiscal stimulus, not structural reform</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: World Bank indicators SWE 2024 vs. DNK 2024</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society">2. Gender Policy (Women's Rights Advocates, Civil Society)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society">2. Gender Policy (Women's Rights Advocates, Civil Society)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Women's shelter closure wave (HD10438 interpellation) reveals funding gap between national violence strategy (HD03245) and local implementation</li>
 <li>Wage gap persisting despite EU directive pressure (HD10437) — enforcement mechanism weak</li>
 <li>State strategic violence prevention strategy passed legislatively but opposition questions resource allocation</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders">3. Environmental Governance (Environmental Organisations, Green Economy Stakeholders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders">3. Environmental Governance (Environmental Organisations, Green Economy Stakeholders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) risks EU Taxonomy and biodiversity commitments</li>
 <li>Wind power municipal reform (HD03239) introduces local veto risk, potentially slowing green transition</li>
 <li>New environmental permit agency (HD03238) raises efficiency questions — whether streamlining helps or weakens environmental protection</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities">4. Regional Disparities (Local Government, Rural Communities)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities">4. Regional Disparities (Local Government, Rural Communities)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Closure of state service offices in peripheral areas (HD11718 — southeastern Skåne question)</li>
 <li>Municipal harbour reform (TU19) centralises port governance, raising concerns for smaller coastal municipalities</li>
 <li>Police education reform (HD03237) — whether paying police training will improve rural recruitment unclear</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition">5. Constitutional Process (Legal Scholars, Opposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition">5. Constitutional Process (Legal Scholars, Opposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Two constitutional changes (HD01KU32, KU33) approved as "vilande" — means post-2026 election parliament must confirm, creating policy uncertainty</li>
 <li>Digital records privacy in criminal investigations (HD01KU33) raises press freedom concerns</li>
 <li>Accessibility requirements for media (HD01KU32) welcomed by disability rights groups</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition">1. Electoral Positioning (Government Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition">1. Electoral Positioning (Government Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Crime package (HD03218 double penalties, HD03246 youth, HD03217 civil servants) directly addresses top voter priority</li>
 <li>Fuel tax cut (HD03236) delivers tangible pre-election relief to households</li>
 <li>NATO contribution (HD03220) demonstrates security responsibility ahead of September vote</li>
 <li>Window to consolidate government record before election campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context">2. Green Industrial Strategy (Business Sector, EU Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context">2. Green Industrial Strategy (Business Sector, EU Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>New electricity system law (HD03240) enables renewable energy expansion</li>
 <li>Environmental permit agency reform (HD03238) could attract clean-tech investment if streamlined effectively</li>
 <li>Swedish wind energy potential if municipality reform (HD03239) strikes right balance</li>
 <li>Green Taxonomy-aligned investments could boost sluggish GDP</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective">3. Nordic Economic Integration (Business, Nordic Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective">3. Nordic Economic Integration (Business, Nordic Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's GDP per capita (USD 57,117) remains competitive despite slow growth</li>
 <li>Housing market reforms (HD01CU28, HD01CU27) improve property rights transparency — foreign investment attractiveness</li>
 <li>Digital infrastructure (e-ID, data interoperability) positions Sweden for digital economy leadership</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective">4. Ukraine/International Leadership (Diplomatic, EU Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective">4. Ukraine/International Leadership (Diplomatic, EU Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Special tribunal accession (HD03231) builds international rule-of-law credentials</li>
 <li>NATO Finland contribution strengthens Nordic defence cooperation</li>
 <li>Arms export control modernisation (HD03114) balances security and democratic accountability</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective">5. Social Cohesion Reform (Academic, Think-Tank Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective">5. Social Cohesion Reform (Academic, Think-Tank Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Guardianship reform (HD01CU22) strengthens legal protections for vulnerable individuals</li>
 <li>New violence prevention strategy (HD03245) aligns with EU gender equality commitments</li>
 <li>Wage transparency directive implementation creates structural market correction opportunity</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts">1. Electoral Volatility (Political Risk Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts">1. Electoral Volatility (Political Risk Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Five months to September 2026 election — legislative agenda increasingly campaign-driven</li>
 <li>SD maintains legislative influence without formal government membership — creates accountability opacity</li>
 <li>Opposition unified on cost-of-living and welfare issues; government fiscal conservatism may face backlash</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts">2. Economic Deterioration Risk (Economists, Fiscal Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts">2. Economic Deterioration Risk (Economists, Fiscal Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's GDP growth (0.82%) cannot sustain high unemployment (8.7%) without fiscal stimulus</li>
 <li>Extra budget fuel tax cuts reduce revenue without structural employment improvements</li>
 <li>Risk of "stagflation light" if energy prices spike again post-support programme</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions">3. Environmental/Climate Commitments (EU, International Institutions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions">3. Environmental/Climate Commitments (EU, International Institutions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) risks EU infringement proceedings</li>
 <li>Wind power municipal veto (HD03239) may undermine Sweden's EU renewable energy targets</li>
 <li>Climate credibility gap threatens Nordic leadership position</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context">4. Security Escalation (Defence Analysts, NATO Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context">4. Security Escalation (Defence Analysts, NATO Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>NATO forward presence in Finland (HD03220) — cost trajectory unclear</li>
 <li>Civil preparedness legislation in pipeline — significant budgetary implications</li>
 <li>Any Baltic security deterioration could overwhelm planned defence spending (spring budget)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media">5. Social Fragmentation (Social Policy Researchers, Media)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media">5. Social Fragmentation (Social Policy Researchers, Media)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Women's shelter closures (HD10438) signal civil society funding squeeze</li>
 <li>Youth unemployment elevated — stricter penalties for young offenders (HD03246) without parallel rehabilitation investment risks recidivism</li>
@@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media">5. Social Fra
 <li>Regional public service withdrawal (southeastern Skåne HD11718) deepens urban-rural divide</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1892,12 +1892,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Primary Concern</th><th>Outlook</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government Coalition</td><td>Electoral positioning</td><td>Cautiously optimistic</td><td>Crime + budget package</td></tr><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>Accountability + welfare</td><td>Active opposition mode</td><td>41 interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>SD Supporters</td><td>Crime, immigration</td><td>Satisfied</td><td>HD03218 double penalties</td></tr><tr><td>Women's Rights Orgs</td><td>Shelter closures, wage gap</td><td>Alarmed</td><td>HD10438, HD10437</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental NGOs</td><td>Forestry, wind power</td><td>Critical</td><td>HD03242, HD03239</td></tr><tr><td>Business Sector</td><td>Energy costs, digital infra</td><td>Mixed positive</td><td>HD03236, HD03244</td></tr><tr><td>Local Government</td><td>Service withdrawals, ports</td><td>Concerned</td><td>HD11718, TU19</td></tr><tr><td>Legal Professionals</td><td>Civil servant liability</td><td>Watching</td><td>HD03217</td></tr><tr><td>Defence/Security</td><td>NATO costs</td><td>Supportive</td><td>HD03220</td></tr><tr><td>Academic/Think-tanks</td><td>Constitutional changes</td><td>Monitoring</td><td>HD01KU32/33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>📋 Template reference:</strong> <code>analysis/templates/threat-analysis.md</code> v3.3 (2026-06-01). Political Threat Taxonomy · Attack Tree · Kill Chain · Diamond Model — <strong>NOT</strong> STRIDE.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-analysis-context">📋 Threat Analysis Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-analysis-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-analysis-context">📋 Threat Analysis Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1933,11 +1933,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-analysis-context">📋 Threat Analysis Context<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat Analysis ID</strong></td><td><code>THR-2026-04-19-001</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 16:00 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>Monthly review — 2026-03-20 to 2026-04-19 (Riksmöte 2025/26, spring sprint)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td><code>news-monthly-review</code> workflow (Tier-C, 1.5× multiplier)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Political Context</strong></td><td>Sweden is 147 days from the 2026-09-13 general election. The Tidö-constellation coalition (M+KD+L + SD parliamentary support) has accelerated its legislative delivery with 4 budget propositions, a crime-reform trilogy (HD03218 / HD03246 / HD03217), and two <em>vilande</em> grundlag changes (HD01KU32 / HD01KU33). Opposition (S/V/C/MP) activity has intensified (41 interpellations in 30 days — highest rate of the session).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td><strong>MODERATE</strong> (trending HIGH on accountability + power-balance axes, LOW on narrative-integrity axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Severity Scale:</strong> 1=Negligible · 2=Minor · 3=Moderate · 4=Major · 5=Severe. All 6 Political Threat Taxonomy categories assessed below — STRIDE categories are <strong>not</strong> used for political threat analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-political-threat-landscape">Political Threat Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-landscape"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-political-threat-landscape">Political Threat Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-landscape"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "🏷️ Political Threat Taxonomy"
         NI["🎭 Narrative Integrity&#x3C;br/>Disinformation &#x26; False Framing"]
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-political-threat-landscape">Political Threat Landscape<a class="" ari
     class AC1,PB1 major
     class DP1,LI1 moderate
     class NI1,TR1 minor</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered">Threat Severity Table (all 6 categories covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered">Threat Severity Table (all 6 categories covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered">Threat Severity Table
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Taxonomy Category</th><th>Threat (1-sentence)</th><th align="center">Sev</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>NI-01</td><td><strong>Narrative Integrity</strong></td><td>Electoral framing of fuel-tax cut (HD03236) as "household relief" elides structural unemployment 8.7% and fiscal cost</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD03236, HD03100, HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>LI-01</td><td><strong>Legislative Integrity</strong></td><td>Expanded civil-servant criminal liability HD03217 + double-penalty HD03218 combination creates punitive legislative stack without parallel appeal-mechanism expansion</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD03217, HD03218, HD03246</td></tr><tr><td>AC-01</td><td><strong>Accountability</strong></td><td>KU33 narrowing of "formellt tillförd bevisning" + press-freedom scope (TF 2:1) limits investigative journalism access to evidence in searches — <em>vilande</em> pending second-reading post-election</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td>TR-01</td><td><strong>Transparency</strong></td><td>Baseline g0v.se department attribution gap (266/268 monthly documents return <em>"unknown"</em>) persists — documented limitation, not new risk; risk is entrenchment</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code>, HD03244</td></tr><tr><td>DP-01</td><td><strong>Democratic Process</strong></td><td>KU32 + KU33 <em>vilande</em> design turns Sep 2026 election into de-facto constitutional referendum; post-election Riksdag composition gates whether the grundlag changes confirm or lapse</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td>PB-01</td><td><strong>Power Balance</strong></td><td>Pre-election legislative concentration: 4 budgets (HD03100/HD0399/HD03236/HD03241) + 3 crime bills + 4 environmental deregulation bills in 30 days concentrated in executive-coalition arithmetic with SD as kingmaker</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD03218, HD03239, HD03242, HD03236</td></tr><tr><td>PB-02</td><td><strong>Power Balance</strong></td><td>Swedish contribution to NATO eFP in Finland (HD03220) transfers operational discretion to ÖB / NATO SACEUR — broad cross-party support but reduces parliamentary operational oversight</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td><td>HD03220, HD03231</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net coverage</strong>: All 6 Political Threat Taxonomy categories covered with ≥ 1 threat each; 2 threats rated <strong>Major (4)</strong>, 3 rated <strong>Moderate (3)</strong>, 2 rated <strong>Minor (2)</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat (AC-01: KU33 press-freedom narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat (AC-01: KU33 press-freedom narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: Entrench narrow interpretation of&#x3C;br/>'formellt tillförd bevisning' in TF 2:1&#x3C;br/>post-2026-09-13 election"]
     ROOT --> A1["Path A: Second-reading pass&#x3C;br/>in same-composition Riksdag"]
@@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing
     style A3a fill:#ffc107,color:#000</pre>
 <p><strong>Attack-tree reading</strong>: The top threat (AC-01) succeeds if <strong>any one of three paths</strong> completes. Disrupting the threat requires mitigation on <strong>all three</strong> paths simultaneously — electorally (Path A), institutionally (Path B via Lagrådet engagement), and civil-society (Path C via co-ordinated remissvar). See <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Monitoring Triggers for the timeline. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01">⛓️ Section 3: Kill Chain Assessment (Top Threat AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01">⛓️ Section 3: Kill Chain Assessment (Top Threat AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2119,7 +2119,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01">⛓️ Section
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Definition</th><th>Current State (2026-04-19)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></td><td>Identify constitutional opportunity</td><td>✅ Complete — KU33 drafted, coalition consensus reached</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaponisation</strong></td><td>Draft legal text</td><td>✅ Complete — proposition framed; <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em> clause embedded</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Delivery</strong></td><td>Introduce in chamber</td><td>✅ Complete — first reading tabled, <em>vilande</em> vote taken</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Exploitation</strong></td><td>Second-reading confirmation</td><td>🟡 Pending — blocked until post-2026-09-13 Riksdag</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Installation</strong></td><td>Grundlag-level entrenchment</td><td>⛔ Not yet — requires second-reading pass in new Riksdag</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C2 / Persistence</strong></td><td>Case-law precedent via early prosecutions</td><td>⛔ Not yet — depends on installation</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Action on Objectives</strong></td><td>Systematic narrowing of investigative-journalism access</td><td>⛔ Not yet — downstream of installation</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Kill-chain reading</strong>: The threat has progressed through <strong>Delivery</strong> and is held at <strong>Exploitation</strong>. The <strong>decisive disruption window</strong> is <strong>pre-second-reading</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026) + election campaign (summer 2026) + new Riksdag composition (2026-09-24). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — Primary Threat Actor (PB-01 · Tidö coalition legislative concentration)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — Primary Threat Actor (PB-01 · Tidö coalition legislative concentration)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A["👤 ADVERSARY&#x3C;br/>Tidö coalition legislative machinery&#x3C;br/>M+KD+L + SD parliamentary support"]
     I["🏗️ INFRASTRUCTURE&#x3C;br/>- Regeringskansliet legislative pipeline&#x3C;br/>- Coalition-discipline voting record (0 SD-defections)&#x3C;br/>- Budget-proposition scheduling authority"]
@@ -2137,7 +2137,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition
     style V fill:#ffc107,color:#000</pre>
 <p><strong>Diamond reading</strong>: The adversary is <strong>not a malicious actor</strong> — it is the <strong>legitimate exercise of parliamentary majority under coalition discipline</strong>. The threat is not to democracy itself but to <strong>deliberative depth</strong>: capability × infrastructure produces legislative velocity that may outpace victim-side (opposition + Lagrådet + civil society) review bandwidth. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor Profile — ICO (Intent-Capability-Opportunity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor Profile — ICO (Intent-Capability-Opportunity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2188,36 +2188,36 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Intent</th><th align="center">Capability</th><th align="center">Opportunity</th><th align="center">Composite</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Tidö coalition (M+KD+L)</strong></td><td align="center">8/10 — explicit pre-election delivery agenda</td><td align="center">9/10 — operational legislative pipeline</td><td align="center">9/10 — parliamentary majority, 147 days to election</td><td align="center"><strong>8.7/10 HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (kingmaker)</strong></td><td align="center">7/10 — crime-package and migration ownership</td><td align="center">6/10 — no ministerial portfolios</td><td align="center">8/10 — confidence-and-supply leverage</td><td align="center"><strong>7.0/10 MODERATE</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>S-led opposition bloc</strong></td><td align="center">9/10 — election-campaign positioning</td><td align="center">5/10 — no majority leverage</td><td align="center">6/10 — 41 interpellations / 30 days</td><td align="center"><strong>6.7/10 MODERATE</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V + MP (grundlag-protection advocates)</strong></td><td align="center">9/10 — KU32/KU33 opposition</td><td align="center">4/10 — small parliamentary footprint</td><td align="center">5/10 — may build ECHR challenge H2 2026</td><td align="center"><strong>6.0/10 MODERATE</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>External — Russia (hybrid-threat vector)</strong></td><td align="center">8/10 — documented interest in Nordic destabilisation</td><td align="center">7/10 — MSB/SÄPO-assessed capability</td><td align="center">7/10 — eFP Finland + Ukraine tribunal create friction</td><td align="center"><strong>7.3/10 HIGH</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><code>[HIGH]</code> for domestic actor scores; <code>[MEDIUM]</code> for external actor (dependent on SÄPO/MSB threat bulletins — see <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> for source gap).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register">🚨 Section 6: Identified Threats — Consolidated Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01">TH-01 · Pre-election Legislative Concentration (PB-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register">🚨 Section 6: Identified Threats — Consolidated Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01">TH-01 · Pre-election Legislative Concentration (PB-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Power Balance · <strong>Severity</strong>: 4 / Major · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241, HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03242, HD03239</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: 4 budgets + crime trilogy + environmental deregulation cluster delivered in 30 days represents the legislative apex of the spring session. Velocity is legitimate but compresses Lagrådet review windows and opposition-motion preparation cycles. V + MP + S collectively filed 19 counter-motions but could not reach the 175-MP threshold for procedural blocking.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Lagrådet should receive full allocated review time on all grundlag-adjacent items; opposition should front-load second-reading challenges in new Riksdag.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01">TH-02 · KU33 Press-Freedom Narrowing — <em>vilande</em> (AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01">TH-02 · KU33 Press-Freedom Narrowing — <em>vilande</em> (AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Accountability · <strong>Severity</strong>: 4 / Major · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD01KU33, HD01KU32</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: Narrow interpretation of <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em> in TF 2:1 — if confirmed in second reading — sets case-law precedent durable for ≥ 8 years. The <em>vilande</em> design effectively turns Sep-2026 into a constitutional referendum. See §2 Attack Tree and §3 Kill Chain above.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: TU + Pressens Opinionsnämnd + Journalistförbundet co-ordinated remissvar; Lagrådet engagement; post-election statutory-clarity amendments.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02">TH-03 · Hybrid-Threat Exposure Post-eFP Deployment (PB-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02">TH-03 · Hybrid-Threat Exposure Post-eFP Deployment (PB-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Power Balance (external) · <strong>Severity</strong>: 3 / Moderate · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[MEDIUM]</code> (SÄPO/MSB source gap — not in monthly MCP sync)</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03220, HD03231</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: Battalion-task-group deployment to Finland Q3 2026 + leadership on Ukraine Aggression Tribunal (HD03231) elevate Sweden's public profile. External hybrid-threat actors (Russia per documented posture) may respond with information-ops, cyber probing, or physical-infrastructure harassment — leading indicators track through SÄPO/MSB bulletins, not parliamentary documents.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Nordic-Baltic intel-sharing; civil-society resilience; MSB heightened public-info posture through deployment window.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01">TH-04 · Civil-Servant Chilling Effect (LI-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01">TH-04 · Civil-Servant Chilling Effect (LI-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Legislative Integrity · <strong>Severity</strong>: 3 / Moderate · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03217, HD03218, HD03246</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: Extended criminal liability for civil servants (HD03217) paired with a general punitive legislative turn (HD03218/HD03246) risks risk-aversion in agency decision-making — a measurable effect visible in FOI-response latencies and internal-memo culture. V + MP raised rule-of-law objections in committee.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Parallel expansion of administrative appeal mechanisms; JK (Justitiekanslern) monitoring.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative">TH-05 · Environmental-Governance Compliance Friction (LI-02 derivative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative">TH-05 · Environmental-Governance Compliance Friction (LI-02 derivative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Legislative Integrity · <strong>Severity</strong>: 3 / Moderate · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03242, HD03239, HD03238, HD03240</li>
@@ -2225,7 +2225,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative"
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Pre-notification to DG ENV; species-inventory compromise per Finland 2023 precedent; staggered transition timing.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7-severity-distribution">📊 Section 7: Severity Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7-severity-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7-severity-distribution">📊 Section 7: Severity Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7-severity-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Threat Distribution by Severity (Political Threat Taxonomy)
     "Severe (5)" : 0
     "Major (4)" : 2
@@ -2234,7 +2234,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7-severity-distribution">📊 Section 7: Severity Distributi
     "Negligible (1)" : 0</pre>
 <p><strong>Net assessment</strong>: <strong>No Severe (5) threats</strong> — parliamentary guardrails, Lagrådet review, opposition activity and MCP-observable data flows all function. <strong>Two Major (4) threats</strong> require priority mitigation: legislative concentration (PB-01) and KU33 press-freedom narrowing (AC-01). Overall monthly threat level: <strong>MODERATE</strong>, trending HIGH on accountability + power-balance axes in Q3 2026 post-election window. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals">🔭 Section 8: Forward Indicators — MCP-Detectable Escalation Signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals">🔭 Section 8: Forward Indicators — MCP-Detectable Escalation Signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Data Source</th><th>Trigger Threshold</th><th align="center">Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-01</td><td>Lagrådet issues critical yttrande on KU32 or KU33</td><td><code>get_propositioner</code> + Lagrådet web feed</td><td>Keywords "oförenligt", "avstyrka"</td><td align="center">30 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-02</td><td>SD defects on any coalition bill (first defection of session)</td><td><code>search_voteringar</code> with <code>parti=SD</code> + <code>rost≠Ja</code></td><td>≥ 1 SD "Nej" on government bill</td><td align="center">45 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-03</td><td>EU Commission issues formal notice on HD03242 / HD03239</td><td>EU Commission press releases (outside MCP)</td><td>Infringement reference number</td><td align="center">60 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-04</td><td>Parliamentary procedural blocking attempt (1/3 rule)</td><td><code>search_dokument?typ=yrkande</code></td><td>≥ 110 MPs co-sign</td><td align="center">30 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-05</td><td>SÄPO/MSB public threat-level change (hybrid)</td><td>Outside MCP — manual tracking</td><td>Level raise to "elevated"</td><td align="center">90 days (eFP window)</td></tr><tr><td>FI-06</td><td>TU / Journalistförbundet formal remissvar filed on KU33</td><td>g0v.se remiss registry</td><td>Non-null response-id</td><td align="center">45 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Cross-reference: <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Monitoring-Trigger Calendar, <code>executive-brief.md</code> §90-Day Forward Vote Calendar.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-9-upstream-reconciliation">🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-9-upstream-reconciliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-9-upstream-reconciliation">🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-9-upstream-reconciliation"></a></h3>
 <p>Threats carried forward from sibling runs in the 30-day lookback window:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md</code> → TH-01 PB-01 <strong>escalated 3→4</strong> (legislative concentration intensified)</li>
@@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-9-upstream-reconciliation">🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconcil
 </ul>
 <p>Full reconciliation: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a> §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2338,7 +2338,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>File-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-M04</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td><code>monthly-review</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jurisdictions Benchmarked</strong></td><td>🇸🇪 Sweden · 🇩🇰 Denmark · 🇳🇴 Norway · 🇫🇮 Finland · 🇩🇪 Germany · 🇳🇱 Netherlands · 🇪🇺 EU institutions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Sources</strong></td><td>World Bank · OECD · Eurostat · Reporters Without Borders (RSF) · Council of Europe · EU Commission DG ENV / DG JUST</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Reference</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard">Cluster Overview: Sweden's April 2026 Innovates / Follows / Diverges Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard">Cluster Overview: Sweden's April 2026 Innovates / Follows / Diverges Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2437,7 +2437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scor
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Policy Cluster</th><th>Flagship Docs</th><th align="center">SE Innovates</th><th align="center">SE Follows</th><th align="center">SE Diverges</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal stimulus + fuel-tax cut</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DK 2023, DE 2022)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Criminal-networks double penalty</td><td>HD03218</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DK 2018 gang zones)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Youth-offender tightening</td><td>HD03246</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (NL, DK)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Civil-servant criminal liability</td><td>HD03217</td><td align="center">✅ (among strongest in EU)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom / TF narrowing (KU33)</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">⚠️ (EU average tightens)</td></tr><tr><td>Accessibility-oriented TF change (KU32)</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Active forestry + wind municipal veto</td><td>HD03242, HD03239</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">❌ (EU Biodiversity 2030)</td></tr><tr><td>New permit authority</td><td>HD03238</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DE UBA, FI Tukes/SYKE)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine Crime-of-Aggression Tribunal</td><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">✅ (founding member)</td><td align="center">✅ (EU position)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>International Compensation Commission</td><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP operational contribution</td><td>HD03220</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DE/UK/CA Baltic models)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>EU Wage-Transparency transposition pace</td><td>HD10437</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">⚠️ (DK Q1, DE Q2, SE lagging)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline">1. Nordic Economic Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline">1. Nordic Economic Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Nordic GDP Growth Comparison 2024 (%)"
     x-axis ["Sweden", "Denmark", "Norway", "Finland"]
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline">1. Nordic Economic Baseline<a class="" ar
 <li>Inflation has <strong>re-converged</strong> with Nordic peers (2.84 % vs. 2.1–3.2 % band) — the 2023 crisis peak of 8.55 % is resolved. Reduces Riksbank-policy noise from the election.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster">2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster">2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03218</code> mandatory double-penalty enhancement for crimes with gang-network connection; <code>HD03246</code> stricter youth-offender rules; <code>HD03217</code> extended criminal liability for civil servants acting outside authority.</p>
 
 
@@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster">2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Instrument</th><th align="center">Entered Force</th><th>Comparability to HD03218</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>Gang-zone law (<em>visitationszoner</em> + penalty-doubling)</td><td align="center">2018, expanded 2023</td><td><strong>Closest precedent</strong> — zone-based penalty doubling; SE's HD03218 adopts network-based trigger instead (broader)</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td><em>Ondermijningswet</em> (organised-crime financial-tracing)</td><td align="center">2022</td><td>Parallel toolkit; SE lacks equivalent financial-tracing provisions</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>§ 129a / § 129b StGB (terror/organised-crime)</td><td align="center">Long-standing</td><td>Different trigger (membership) but similar enhancement logic</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>Penalty-enhancement <em>straffeloven</em> § 79 (c)</td><td align="center">2021</td><td>Similar conceptually; narrower in scope</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>RL 6:5 aggravation (organised-crime element)</td><td align="center">Stable</td><td>Most restrained Nordic approach</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> the DK gang-zone precedent but with a <strong>broader network-based trigger</strong>. SE's <code>HD03217</code> civil-servant liability is <strong>AMONG THE STRONGEST IN EU</strong> (only NO has a comparably broad inner-authority liability rule). ECHR-litigation risk: see <code>risk-assessment.md</code> R-04.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande">3. Constitutional Press-Freedom Cluster (KU32 + KU33 <em>vilande</em>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande">3. Constitutional Press-Freedom Cluster (KU32 + KU33 <em>vilande</em>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD01KU32</code> media-accessibility grundlag change; <code>HD01KU33</code> search-and-seizure of digital evidence narrowing "allmän handling" scope.</p>
 
 
@@ -2624,7 +2624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande">3. Constit
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Baseline Press-Freedom Framework</th><th align="center">2024–2026 Direction</th><th align="center">RSF 2025 Index</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden</td><td><em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) — world's oldest</td><td align="center">⬇ Narrowing (KU33)</td><td align="center">4</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td><em>Grunnloven</em> § 100; <em>Offentleglova</em></td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td><em>Grundloven</em> § 77; <em>Offentlighedsloven</em> 2014</td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">3</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td><em>Perustuslaki</em> § 12; <em>Julkisuuslaki</em> 1999</td><td align="center">↑ Slight strengthening</td><td align="center">5</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>Art. 5 Grundgesetz</td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">10</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>Art. 7 Grondwet</td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>DIVERGES</strong> from Nordic peers. Every other Nordic country is stable or strengthening press-freedom baselines; Sweden narrows via KU33. <strong>Norway's statutory-trigger model</strong> (<em>Offentleglova</em> enumerated exceptions with written-reason requirement) is the most credible cross-bloc compromise path for the KU33 second-reading debate — <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> H-B monitors this.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction">4. Environmental Deregulation Cluster &#x26; EU Friction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction">4. Environmental Deregulation Cluster &#x26; EU Friction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03238</code> new environmental permit authority · <code>HD03242</code> active forestry · <code>HD03239</code> wind-power municipal veto · <code>HD03240</code> new electricity-system law.</p>
 
 
@@ -2669,9 +2669,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction">4. Environmental D
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>EU Instrument</th><th>Sweden Compliance Risk</th><th>Comparable Precedent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 (30 % protected)</td><td>🔴 HIGH — HD03242 active-forestry narrows species protection</td><td>🇫🇮 FI faced 2023 Natura-2000 peatland scrutiny → species-inventory compromise</td></tr><tr><td>EU Taxonomy Regulation (sustainable-finance TEG)</td><td>🟠 MEDIUM — forestry company financing classification at risk</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>EU Forest Strategy for 2030</td><td>🟠 MEDIUM — binding elements under revision</td><td>🇩🇪 DE holding-pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Renewable Energy Directive III</td><td>🟡 LOW — HD03239 wind-veto adds local-opt-out but meets target pathway</td><td>🇳🇱 NL has comparable local-veto mechanisms</td></tr><tr><td>Water Framework Directive</td><td>🟢 None — unchanged</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC</td><td>🟠 MEDIUM — active-forestry interaction with Article 6(3)</td><td>🇫🇮 FI precedent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>DIVERGES</strong> from EU trajectory on biodiversity. Finland's 2023 Natura-2000 species-inventory compromise is the credible de-escalation path — see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> H-A 90-day trajectory and <code>risk-assessment.md</code> R-02.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster">5. Geopolitical / NATO Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster">5. Geopolitical / NATO Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03220</code> 1,200 troops to Finland under enhanced Forward Presence (first post-accession operational contribution); <code>HD03231</code> + <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark">NATO operational integration benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark">NATO operational integration benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2715,7 +2715,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark">NATO operational integration
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Framework Nation</th><th align="center">Battalion in Baltics since</th><th>Lead Nation For</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Estonia eFP</td><td>Original eFP architect</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Lithuania eFP</td><td>Brigade upgrade 2024</td></tr><tr><td>🇨🇦 Canada</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Latvia eFP</td><td>Recently reinforced</td></tr><tr><td>🇺🇸 US</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Poland (framework)</td><td>Continuous rotational</td></tr><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>2026 (new)</strong></td><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td><strong>First Swedish operational output post-accession</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: Sweden <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> the UK/DE/CA eFP model — contributing a framework-nation-style presence to Finland. No lead-nation role yet; expected 2027+ review cycle.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship">International-justice norm entrepreneurship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship">International-justice norm entrepreneurship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2759,9 +2759,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship">International-justice no
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Instrument</th><th align="center">SE Position</th><th align="center">EU Position</th><th align="center">US Position</th><th align="center">Russia Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Council of Europe Crime-of-Aggression Tribunal (HD03231)</td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">Supportive</td><td align="center">Ambiguous (post-admin shift)</td><td align="center">Hostile</td></tr><tr><td>International Compensation Commission (HD03232)</td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">Supportive (EUR 260 B Euroclear asset frozen)</td><td align="center">Fluctuating</td><td align="center">Hostile</td></tr><tr><td>ICC Rome Statute</td><td align="center">Party</td><td align="center">Parties</td><td align="center">Not party</td><td align="center">Withdrew</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR</td><td align="center">Party</td><td align="center">Parties</td><td align="center">n/a</td><td align="center">Expelled 2022</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>INNOVATES</strong> — Sweden is a <strong>founding member</strong> of the first Crime-of-Aggression tribunal since Nuremberg. This is a decadal norm-entrepreneurship play (see <code>swot-analysis.md</code> §Opportunity O-1 and <code>executive-brief.md</code> §Top-5 Opportunities).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-gender--equality-cluster">6. Gender / Equality Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-gender--equality-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-gender--equality-cluster">6. Gender / Equality Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-gender--equality-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03245</code> national strategy against men's violence; <code>HD10437</code> EU Wage Transparency Directive interpellation; <code>HD10438</code> women's-shelter-closure interpellation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07">EU Wage Transparency Directive 2023/970 transposition race (deadline <strong>2026-06-07</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07">EU Wage Transparency Directive 2023/970 transposition race (deadline <strong>2026-06-07</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2800,7 +2800,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-20
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Status April 2026</th><th align="center">Expected Completion</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>✅ <strong>Transposed</strong> Q1 2026</td><td align="center">Done</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>🟡 Draft in Bundestag (Gesetzentwurf)</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>🟡 Draft in Tweede Kamer</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>🟡 HE prepared</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>🔴 <strong>Remissförfarande open</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Q3 2026 risk</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>DIVERGES</strong> — Sweden risks being among the <strong>last</strong> EU-27 to transpose despite a strong gender-equality reputation. <code>HD10437</code> interpellation makes this a campaign issue. <strong>Electoral implication</strong>: opposition attack vector paired with <code>HD10438</code> shelter crisis.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house">7. Democratic-Resilience Benchmark (V-Dem + RSF + Freedom House)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house">7. Democratic-Resilience Benchmark (V-Dem + RSF + Freedom House)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2849,7 +2849,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house">7. Democ
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">🇸🇪 SE 2025</th><th align="center">🇳🇴 NO 2025</th><th align="center">🇩🇰 DK 2025</th><th align="center">🇫🇮 FI 2025</th><th align="center">Δ vs 2020</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>V-Dem Liberal Democracy Index</td><td align="center">0.88</td><td align="center">0.90</td><td align="center">0.89</td><td align="center">0.88</td><td align="center">SE: -0.02</td></tr><tr><td>RSF Press Freedom Index (rank)</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">SE: ↓ 3</td></tr><tr><td>Freedom House (score /100)</td><td align="center">100</td><td align="center">100</td><td align="center">97</td><td align="center">100</td><td align="center">SE: ± 0</td></tr><tr><td>Corruption Perceptions (TI)</td><td align="center">82</td><td align="center">84</td><td align="center">88</td><td align="center">87</td><td align="center">SE: -3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: Sweden has experienced a <strong>mild liberal-democracy erosion</strong> (V-Dem -0.02, RSF -3 rank) since 2020, driven in part by TF narrowing and institutional-trust trends. <strong>Still highest-tier globally</strong> but <strong>no longer the Nordic leader</strong> on press freedom.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026">Summary — Sweden's International Positioning in April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026">Summary — Sweden's International Positioning in April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2908,18 +2908,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026">Summary —
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Posture</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal policy</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS (cautious Nordic mainstream)</td><td>No reputational friction</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal justice</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS (DK gang-zone precedent + broader network trigger)</td><td>Aligned with Nordic-tough trend</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-servant liability</td><td align="center">🟢 INNOVATES</td><td>Positive ISMS signal; minor ECHR risk</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional press freedom (KU33)</td><td align="center">🔴 DIVERGES</td><td><strong>Reputational-risk vector</strong> — RSF impact likely</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental deregulation</td><td align="center">🔴 DIVERGES from EU Biodiversity 2030</td><td><strong>Infringement-proceeding risk</strong></td></tr><tr><td>EU Wage-Transparency transposition</td><td align="center">🟠 LAGS</td><td>Campaign attack-vector</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine international-justice accession</td><td align="center">🟢 INNOVATES (founding member)</td><td>Decadal norm-entrepreneurship dividend</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP Finland contribution</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS (UK/DE/CA framework model)</td><td>Operational credibility; no lead-nation role yet</td></tr><tr><td>Gender-equality strategy</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS Nordic baseline; shelter-crisis drag</td><td>Policy/rhetoric mismatch is visible</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net cluster verdict</strong>: Sweden in April 2026 is a <strong>norm entrepreneur abroad</strong> (Ukraine tribunal, reparations commission) while <strong>normatively diverging domestically</strong> on press freedom and environmental compliance. This tension is the April 2026 <strong>international-reputation fulcrum</strong> — see <code>swot-analysis.md</code> §Opportunities and <code>threat-analysis.md</code> §TH-04.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Nordic baseline table <strong>aligned</strong> to <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code></a> with the monthly-scope extension to include DE, NL, and EU institutions as required by <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> Tier-C contract (≥ 5 jurisdictions).</li>
 <li>Wage-transparency benchmarking <strong>updated</strong> to reflect DK completion (Q1 2026) from last weekly-review snapshot.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next review</strong>: 2026-05-19 (monthly cadence) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 · <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"WORLD BANK ECONOMIC CONTEXT INTEGRATION"</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package">🔒 ISMS CIA-Triad Classification (Riksdagsmonitor Package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package">🔒 ISMS CIA-Triad Classification (Riksdagsmonitor Package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Scope</strong>: This classification governs the <strong>monthly-review intelligence package itself</strong> — the 14 analysis artefacts, the article, and their handling. It is <strong>not</strong> a classification of Swedish government documents (which are classified per <em>Offentlighets- och sekretesslagen</em> by the respective authorities).</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2953,7 +2953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package">🔒 ISMS CIA
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Rating</th><th>Justification</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Confidentiality</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Public</strong></td><td>All inputs are <em>allmänna handlingar</em> (public documents from <code>data.riksdagen.se</code> + <code>regeringen.se</code>) + open data (World Bank, SCB, g0v.se). No personal data beyond named public officials acting in political capacity.</td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code> §Source Registry</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Integrity</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 <strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Analysis informs political-accountability reporting and editorial decisions; factual errors (vote-count, dok_id, minister attribution) would propagate to 14 translated articles and cause reputational + informational harm.</td><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Uncertainty Hot-Spots</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Availability</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Articles are published daily; a 24-hour outage degrades but does not destroy journalistic value (retrospectives remain retrievable). No real-time operational dependency.</td><td>GitHub Pages SLA + dual-deploy (GH Pages + S3)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-compliance-framework-mapping">Compliance Framework Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-framework-mapping"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compliance-framework-mapping">Compliance Framework Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-framework-mapping"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2995,7 +2995,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-compliance-framework-mapping">Compliance Framework Mapping<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Framework</th><th>Applicable Controls</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>GDPR (EU 2016/679)</strong></td><td>Art. 6(1)(e) public interest · Art. 6(1)(f) legitimate interest · Art. 85 journalism derogation — covers processing of named politicians in political capacity</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU AI Act (2024/1689)</strong></td><td>Art. 50 AI-transparency disclosure — article carries AI-authored-with-human-review disclosure; news-journalist agent documented in <code>.github/agents/</code></td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ISO 27001:2022</strong></td><td>A.5.10 information classification · A.5.12 labelling · A.5.14 information transfer · A.8.11 data masking (not applicable — public only)</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NIST CSF 2.0</strong></td><td>ID.AM-5 data classified · ID.RA risk assessed (see <code>risk-assessment.md</code>) · PR.DS-2 in-transit protection (HTTPS)</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>CIS Controls v8.1</strong></td><td>CIS 3.1 data-management process · CIS 3.2 data-inventory (dok_id manifest) · CIS 14.9 documentation of data processing</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdagsmonitor ISMS policies</strong></td><td><code>AI_Policy.md</code>, <code>Secure_Development_Policy.md</code>, <code>CLASSIFICATION.md</code>, <code>Information_Security_Policy.md</code> (Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC)</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-retention--handling">Retention &#x26; Handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--handling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-retention--handling">Retention &#x26; Handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--handling"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retention</strong>: Permanent public archive in git history + GitHub Pages. <code>documents/</code> raw JSON retained indefinitely for provenance audit.</li>
 <li><strong>Sharing</strong>: No restrictions. All artefacts suitable for external distribution, syndication, and academic citation.</li>
@@ -3003,7 +3003,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-retention--handling">Retention &#x26; Handling<a class="" aria-hidden
 <li><strong>AI governance</strong>: Article header declares AI-authored-with-human-review per EU AI Act Art. 50. Prompt-injection defences per <code>.github/skills/ai-governance/</code>.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain">Document Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain">Document Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Policy Domain Distribution (April 2026)
     "Justice &#x26; Crime" : 18
     "Fiscal &#x26; Economy" : 15
@@ -3016,7 +3016,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain">Document Classification by
     "Constitutional" : 4
     "Other" : 14</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3184,37 +3184,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (EN)</th><th>Domain</th><th>Type</th><th>Significance</th><th>Electoral Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Double penalties for criminal networks</td><td>Justice</td><td>Proposition</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Spring Economic Proposition 2026</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Proposition</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra budget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Proposition</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>NATO Finland contribution</td><td>Defence</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>New environmental permit agency</td><td>Environment</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>National strategy against men's violence</td><td>Social</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Stricter youth offender rules</td><td>Justice</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Extended civil servant criminal liability</td><td>Justice</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Active forestry regulation</td><td>Environment</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Data interoperability public sector</td><td>Digital</td><td>Proposition</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power in municipalities</td><td>Energy</td><td>Proposition</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>New electricity system law</td><td>Energy</td><td>Proposition</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>National condominium register</td><td>Housing</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property ID requirements</td><td>Housing</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Media accessibility (vilande)</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Digital records in searches (vilande)</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>Women's shelter closures</td><td>Social</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>Wage transparency directive</td><td>Labour</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion — oppose fuel tax cut</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Motion</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 1: Pre-Election Crime Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 1: Pre-Election Crime Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03237</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: SD-driven agenda delivered through coalition legislation</li>
 <li>Opposition stance: S/V abstain or oppose, C partially supportive</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 2: Spring Budget Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 2: Spring Budget Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241, HD03243</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: Responsible budget + household relief</li>
 <li>Opposition stance: MP opposes fuel cuts; S demands structural investment</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance">Cluster 3: Environmental Reform Cluster (High EU/International Relevance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance">Cluster 3: Environmental Reform Cluster (High EU/International Relevance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD03238, HD03239, HD03240, HD03242, MJU19</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: Streamlined regulation for green economy growth</li>
 <li>Opposition stance: V/MP strongly oppose deregulation; C mixed</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention">Cluster 4: Social Protection Gap (High Public Attention)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention">Cluster 4: Social Protection Gap (High Public Attention)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD10438, HD10437, HD03245, HD11719</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: Gap between legislative intent and implementation funding</li>
 <li>Opportunity for S to campaign on welfare state restoration</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     BUDGET["📊 SPRING BUDGET PACKAGE"]
     HD03100["HD03100\nSpring Economic Proposition"]
@@ -3268,7 +3268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" a
     HD03238 -.->|"Interacts with"| HD03239
     HD03238 -.->|"Interacts with"| HD03242</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3336,7 +3336,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Primary dok_id</th><th>Related dok_id</th><th>Relationship</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Supplementary budget to spring prop</td><td>Critical fiscal linkage</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Crime bill needs police capacity</td><td>Implementation dependency</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>HD10438</td><td>Strategy vs. on-the-ground reality</td><td>Policy credibility gap</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Same agency will handle wind power</td><td>Institutional overlap</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Permit agency + forestry = deregulation agenda</td><td>Thematic cluster</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>HD0399</td><td>NATO costs financed through spring budget</td><td>Budget dependency</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Both constitutional changes — same vilande cycle</td><td>Process linkage</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Wage gap + violence — gender equality cluster</td><td>Thematic</td></tr><tr><td>HD11719</td><td>HD10438</td><td>Both reveal state protection failures for women</td><td>Social cohesion signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-article-type-connections">Sibling Article Type Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-article-type-connections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-article-type-connections">Sibling Article Type Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-article-type-connections"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3364,7 +3364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-article-type-connections">Sibling Article Type Connections<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>This Article</th><th>Sibling Type</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Monthly review (2026-04-19)</td><td>Week-ahead (2026-04-14)</td><td>Month-end review captures week-ahead items that concluded</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly review (2026-04-19)</td><td>Propositions (2026-04-14)</td><td>Validates proposition-level analysis with monthly synthesis</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly review (2026-04-19)</td><td>Monthly review (2026-03-19)</td><td>Prior month comparative baseline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies">Legislative Pipeline Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies">Legislative Pipeline Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     A[Spring Prop HD03100] -->|Frames| B[Autumn Budget Sept 2026]
     B -->|Influences| C[Post-election government programme]
@@ -3373,7 +3373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies">Legislative Pipeline Dependencies<
     F[Environmental reforms] -->|Subject to| G[EU compliance review Q3 2026]
     H[Constitutional changes KU32/33] -->|Require| I[Post-election parliament confirmation]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3409,7 +3409,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>File-ID</strong></td><td>MET-2026-M04</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td><code>monthly-review</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 — Rules 0–8</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Contract</strong></td><td><code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §14-Artifact Reference-Grade Gate · §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lookback Window</strong></td><td><strong>30 days</strong> (sibling-run ingestion per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3467,7 +3467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rule</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R-0</strong> Two-pass iteration (Pass 1 + Pass 2 improvement)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Pass 1 synthesis + analysis created at t+0–15 min; Pass 2 critical re-read replaced generic language with dok_id citations, added Election-2026 lens, expanded Nordic benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-1</strong> MCP-only factual sourcing (no fabrication)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>7 Riksdag MCP tool calls (sync_status, propositioner, betankanden, motioner, interpellationer, fragor, voteringar), 8 World Bank indicators, g0v.se department-analysis call</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-2</strong> Evidence tables with dok_id citations throughout</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Every SWOT entry, stakeholder perspective, scenario trigger, and risk register row carries explicit dok_id (HD03100, HD03218, HD01KU33, etc.)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-3</strong> Mermaid diagrams (≥ 1 per major file)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> timeline + mindmap · <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> decision flowchart · <code>comparative-international.md</code> xychart-beta · <code>swot-analysis.md</code> quadrant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-4</strong> 8-party coverage (M, SD, KD, L, S, V, C, MP)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §Party Activity Analysis + <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-5</strong> Election-2026 lens (confidence-scaled)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Every scenario, stakeholder, and risk carries ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦 confidence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-6</strong> Tier-C 14-artifact completeness</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>14 files present; all at or above byte-threshold after Pass 2 retrofit (see §3 below)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-7</strong> Upstream watchpoint reconciliation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>See §2 below — 16 upstream watchpoints reconciled, zero silent drops</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-8</strong> Depth tier match (<code>deep</code> = 3 iterations, ≥ 5 SWOT stakeholders, ≥ 2 charts, mindmap)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>3 iterations completed; 8-stakeholder SWOT; 4+ charts; Mermaid mindmap in synthesis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis">2. 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis">2. 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lookback scope</strong>: 30 days of sibling daily runs (2026-03-20 → 2026-04-19) + <code>weekly-review/2026-04-18</code> + <code>month-ahead/2026-04-19</code> + prior monthly baseline (<code>2026-03-30</code>).</p>
 <p><strong>Hard rule</strong>: Every forward indicator issued by a sibling run within the lookback window is explicitly reconciled. No silent drops.</p>
 
@@ -3615,7 +3615,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_pat
 <p><strong>Reconciliation integrity</strong>: 16 watchpoints · 13 carried forward · 2 carried with justified adjustment · 1 retired with reason · 0 silent drops. <strong>Contract satisfied.</strong></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19 15:25 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_propositioner, get_motioner, get_betankanden, search_voteringar, search_anforanden, get_fragor, get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 1200
@@ -3629,7 +3629,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 200 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 200 documents</li>
@@ -3639,9 +3639,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 200 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 200 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-17 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3689,7 +3706,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:04.164Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:25.563Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html b/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html
index b9e60c7592..17162aae65 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Riksdag Monthly Review: April 2026 (Spring Term Peak)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.374Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.739Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.374Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.739Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Monthly Review: April 2026 (Spring Term Peak)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:04.374Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Monthly Review: April 2026 (Spring Term Peak)","description":"---","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:25.739Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-monthly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu22.json","name":"documents/hd01cu22.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu27.json","name":"documents/hd01cu27.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu28.json","name":"documents/hd01cu28.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu42.json","name":"documents/hd01cu42.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku32.json","name":"documents/hd01ku32.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd01ku33.json","name":"documents/hd01ku33.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd024098.json","name":"documents/hd024098.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10437.json","name":"documents/hd10437.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd10438.json","name":"documents/hd10438.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11718.json","name":"documents/hd11718.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/documents/hd11719.json","name":"documents/hd11719.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts — 30-day retrospective</em>
 </p>
@@ -243,12 +243,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-M04 (Monthly-Review)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>PUBLIC · Time-to-read ≤ 5 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coverage Window</strong></td><td>2026-03-20 → 2026-04-19 (Riksmöte 2025/26, spring budget peak)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or investment decision spanning the pre-election 30 days</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>30 days · 90 days · post-Sep 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Author</strong></td><td>News Journalist agent · James Pether Sörling editorial responsibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 Rules 0–8 · Pass 2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Continuity</strong></td><td>Ingests 30 daily sibling runs + <code>weekly-review/2026-04-18</code> + <code>month-ahead/2026-04-19</code> (see <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>April 2026 was the single most electorally consequential month of the 2025/26 Riksdag session.</strong> The Tidö-koalitionen (M–SD–KD–L) under PM <strong>Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong> and Finance Minister <strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong> concentrated its identity-defining legislation into a four-week pre-election sprint: the <strong>Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (Vårproposition <code>HD03100</code> + Vårändringsbudget <code>HD0399</code> + Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code> — fuel-tax cut 82 öre/litre + el/gas household relief, ≈ SEK 60 B net stimulus); a <strong>criminal-justice bloc</strong> (<code>HD03218</code> double penalties for criminal networks, <code>HD03217</code> extended civil-servant liability, <code>HD03246</code> stricter youth-offender rules, <code>HD03245</code> national men's-violence strategy, <code>HD03237</code> paid police education); a <strong>constitutional pair</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> media-accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> search-and-seizure of digital evidence — both declared <em>vilande</em>, requiring confirmation by the post-September-2026 Riksdag and thereby making the general election a <strong>de-facto referendum on constitutional change</strong>); a <strong>NATO operational first</strong> (<code>HD03220</code> Sweden's 1,200-troop contribution to Finnish NATO eFP — first Article-5-era force deployment to allied territory); an <strong>environmental-deregulation package</strong> (<code>HD03238</code> new permit authority, <code>HD03242</code> active forestry, <code>HD03239</code> wind-power municipal veto, <code>HD03240</code> new electricity-system law); and <strong>international-justice accession</strong> (<code>HD03231</code> Special Tribunal on Crime of Aggression against Ukraine + <code>HD03232</code> International Compensation Commission). Against <strong>0.82 % GDP growth 2024</strong> (vs DK 3.48 %, NO 2.10 %, FI 0.42 %; World Bank) and <strong>8.7 % unemployment 2025</strong>, the month crystallises a <strong>dual-positioning strategy</strong>: fiscal stimulus + toughness on crime/border for swing voters, constitutional + environmental deregulation for the coalition's right flank — with the <strong>women's-shelter closure interpellation <code>HD10438</code></strong> opening the central opposition attack vector. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Election-campaign coverage architecture</strong> (2026-05-01 → 2026-09-13)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §Three Base Scenarios + ACH grid · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> Top-14</td><td align="right">Now — before May-1 political holiday cycle</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom + constitutional-continuity editorial posture</strong> in light of KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> S2×T3 TOWS · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Nordic constitutional models · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R-06</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026) and first post-election Riksdag (2026-09-24)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia-hybrid + ECHR-litigation threat monitoring posture</strong> given NATO operational footprint + migration tightening</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> TH-01 + TH-03 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R-01 + R-04</td><td align="right">Continuous; heightened 2026-Q3 (deployment window)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The lead story is the Spring Fiscal Trilogy</strong> (<code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> + <code>HD03236</code>). ≈ SEK 60 B net stimulus; 82 öre/litre fuel-tax cut; el/gas relief. Sweden's 0.82 % 2024 growth trails Nordics by <strong>2–3 percentage points</strong> — the trilogy is simultaneously counter-cyclical economics and pre-election household-relief politics. <strong>Q3-2026 macro data</strong> (the release just before the September vote) becomes the campaign's fiscal-credibility verdict. <code>[VERY HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>The constitutional story is the KU32/KU33 pair</strong> (<code>HD01KU32</code> media accessibility + <code>HD01KU33</code> digital-evidence search/seizure). <strong>Grundlag amendments require two identical Riksdag votes separated by a general election</strong> — the September-2026 campaign thereby becomes a de-facto referendum on narrowing <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766). Interpretive scope of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" in KU33 is the strategic centre of gravity. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met</strong>: all <strong>17 documents</strong> with weighted significance ≥ 7.0 receive dedicated treatment in the companion monthly article; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a>. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 5 ministers / party leaders with dok_id citations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 5 ministers / party leaders with dok_id citations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--5-ministers--party-leaders-with-dok_id-citati
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>dok_id Evidence</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader; trilogy + foreign-policy co-signatory</td><td>HD03100, HD03220, HD03231</td><td>Owns the fiscal + NATO + international-justice package</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, Finance)</td><td>Architect of Vårproposition + Extra budget</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Q3-2026 macro-release = legacy variable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, Justice)</td><td>KU33 + criminal-justice bloc owner</td><td>HD01KU33, HD03218, HD03246, HD03217</td><td>Defines "formellt tillförd bevisning"; youth-offender execution</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pål Jonson</strong> (M, Defence)</td><td>NATO eFP + Ukraine-tribunal pairing</td><td>HD03220, HD03231</td><td>Bn-task-group deployment 2026-Q3; operational NATO posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, Foreign)</td><td>Tribunal + reparations architect</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>Nuremberg-framing author; norm-entrepreneurship dividend</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong> (KD, party leader, Energy)</td><td>Electricity-system law + coalition anchor</td><td>HD03240, HD03239</td><td>Underwrites energy trilogy + wind-power reform</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader, Labour)</td><td>Coalition partner most press-freedom sensitive</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33, HD10437</td><td>Watch for liberal-identity friction on KU33 + wage-transparency transposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong> (SD, party leader)</td><td>Parliamentary-support kingmaker</td><td>HD03218, HD03246</td><td>Crime-package political owner; migration-trio demands</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, opposition leader)</td><td>Counter-budget architect</td><td>HD10438 (shelter interpellation), counter-motions on HD03236</td><td>Position on KU33 second-reading = post-election swing factor</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong> (S, finance spokesman)</td><td>S budget critique</td><td>Counter-motion to HD03100</td><td>Cost-of-living narrative construction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, party leader)</td><td>Anti-deregulation + anti-KU33 voice</td><td>Counter-motions to HD03242, HD03239</td><td>Left-bloc mobilisation architect</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate</td><td>Opposition filings to HD01KU32/33</td><td>Environmental + constitutional dual-axis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Muharrem Demirok</strong> (C, party leader)</td><td>Centre-bloc swing</td><td>C budget-alternative</td><td>Migration counter-motion; coalition-formation pivot under Scenario C</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Micael Bydén</strong> (ÖB, Försvarsmakten)</td><td>Operational owner for eFP deployment</td><td>HD03220</td><td>Bn-task-group readiness Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Collective)</td><td>Constitutional review body</td><td>Pending KU32/KU33 yttrande</td><td>Single most consequential upcoming institutional signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers">🗓 Forward Vote Calendar (Next 90 Days — with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers">🗓 Forward Vote Calendar (Next 90 Days — with Triggers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-vote-calendar-next-90-days--with-triggers">🗓 Forward Vote
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td>Riksdag chamber vote on Extra ändringsbudget <code>HD03236</code></td><td>Confirms fiscal-package coherence; bloc-vote stress-test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-27</strong></td><td>KU annual granskning hearings open</td><td>First post-Easter political-accountability drumbeat</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early May 2026</strong></td><td>Vote on <code>HD03218</code> double-penalty law</td><td>Bloc-vote prediction: 145–147 for, SD kingmaker visibility</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mid May 2026</strong></td><td>Vote on <code>HD03242</code> active forestry + <code>HD03239</code> wind veto</td><td>V + MP + S co-ordinated no-vote; EU-friction escalator</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q2 2026</strong> (April–June)</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU32/KU33</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict language ⇒ R-06 ↓ 4; silent ⇒ R-06 ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>May–June 2026</strong></td><td><em>Kammarvote</em> (vilande beslut) on KU33/KU32 first reading</td><td>First-reading confirmation — second reading in post-election Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Late May / June 2026</strong></td><td>Chamber vote on <code>HD03231</code> + <code>HD03232</code> tribunal/reparations</td><td>Cross-party ≈ 349 MPs; no direct Swedish fiscal burden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>June 2026</strong></td><td>EU Commission response to forestry package</td><td>Environmental-compliance trigger for R-02</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-Q3</strong></td><td>Försvarsmakten Bn-task-group deploys to Finland</td><td>First operational NATO-posture milestone</td></tr><tr><td><strong>July–August 2026</strong></td><td>Women's-shelter emergency-funding decision (expected)</td><td>S attack-line intensity modulator</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H2 2026</strong></td><td>V + C + MP file ECHR challenge on migration trio + civil-servant liability</td><td>Migration-trio durability test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Continuous (heightened)</strong></td><td>SÄPO + MSB hybrid-threat bulletins</td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators (R-01)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-13</strong></td><td>Swedish general election</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects (<code>scenario-analysis.md</code> priors)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-09-24</strong></td><td>First post-election Riksdag</td><td>KU32/KU33 confirmation window opens</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from <code>risk-assessment.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-from-risk-assessmentmd">⚠️ Top-5 Risks (from <cod
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>Russian hybrid-warfare retaliation</strong> post-eFP + tribunal accession</td><td align="center">20 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE PRIORITY</td><td>SÄPO/MSB heightened posture; Nordic-Baltic intel-sharing; civil-society resilience</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>EU Commission infringement</strong> on HD03242 forestry + HD03239 wind-veto</td><td align="center">16 / 25</td><td align="center">🔴 MITIGATE</td><td>Pre-notification to DG ENV; species-inventory compromise (Finland model)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>KU33 narrow-interpretation entrenchment</strong> (interpretive frontier)</td><td align="center">15 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Lagrådet engagement; press-freedom NGO remissvar; statutory clarity in 2nd reading</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Migration trio + civil-servant liability ECHR strike-down</strong></td><td align="center">12 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Government legal review; appeal-mechanism build-out; UNHCR consultation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Women's-shelter crisis politicisation without funding resolution</strong></td><td align="center">10 / 25</td><td align="center">🟠 MITIGATE</td><td>Emergency-budget supplemental; coordinated municipal-state response</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-opportunities">🎯 Top-5 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-opportunities">🎯 Top-5 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-opportunities">🎯 Top-5 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Norm-entrepreneurship dividend</strong> from Ukraine tribunal — Sweden positions as Nordic international-justice leader</td><td>HD03231 + CoE framework</td><td align="center">Decadal</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Cross-party constitutional statesmanship</strong> on KU33 if S endorses Norway-style statutory triggers (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §Nordic models)</td><td>HD01KU33 + Lagrådet</td><td align="center">Q2–Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>NATO-integration reputational capital</strong> if eFP deployment proceeds without incidents</td><td>HD03220 + Försvarsmakten readiness</td><td align="center">2026-Q3/Q4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>Coalition-stability narrative</strong> if Spring Trilogy executes without further close votes</td><td>Voteringsregister + macro indicators</td><td align="center">2026-Q2/Q3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>EU climate-leadership recovery path</strong> via forestry compromise (Finland Natura-2000 precedent)</td><td>HD03242 revision</td><td align="center">Q3 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -623,22 +623,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (fiscal trilogy + electoral balance)</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>Sensitivity analysis confirms top rank under 5 weight variations</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center">🟦 <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></td><td>All 17 documents with weighted ≥ 7.0 covered</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party first-reading vote projection</td><td align="center">🟩 <strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>JuU-style bloc votes operationally validated; SD discipline zero-defection pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election KU33 second-reading outcome</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends on Sep-2026 composition — three plausible coalitions (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Rising baseline post-eFP + tribunal; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission forestry-package response</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Finland precedent informs likely compromise path</td></tr><tr><td>Women's-shelter funding resolution pre-election</td><td align="center">🟥 <strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Political-cost calculus uncertain; S attack-vector durability visible</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR ruling on migration trio</td><td align="center">🟧 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Counter-motion text shows preparedness; Strasbourg docket pace uncertain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md">Data Manifest</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-19 (monthly cadence) or event-driven on Lagrådet KU33 yttrande · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 · <strong>Upstream Continuity Contract</strong>: <code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26<br>
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: AI Political Intelligence (Pass 2 — iteratively improved)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>April 2026 marks one of the most legislatively intensive months of the 2025/26 parliamentary session. The Tidö-koalitionen government (M–SD–KD–L) tabled its <strong>spring budget package</strong> — including an extra change budget cutting fuel taxes and introducing energy price support — against a backdrop of a Swedish economy growing at a modest 0.82% in 2024, far below Denmark's 3.5%. Simultaneously, a sweeping criminal justice overhaul emerged as the session's defining domestic theme, with three major bills targeting criminal networks, youth offenders, and civil servant accountability. Environmental governance was substantially restructured through a new environmental permit authority and active forestry deregulation. The month's activity provides a clear electoral positioning signal ahead of the September 2026 Riksdag election.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological">Key Legislative Developments (Chronological)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological">Key Legislative Developments (Chronological)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title April 2026 Legislative Calendar
     section March 20–31
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-legislative-developments-chronological">Key Legislative Developme
         HD10437 : Interpellation — wage transparency directive
         HD10438 : Interpellation — women's shelter closures</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monthly-legislative-statistics">Monthly Legislative Statistics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-legislative-statistics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monthly-legislative-statistics">Monthly Legislative Statistics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-legislative-statistics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-monthly-legislative-statistics">Monthly Legislative Statistics<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th>Count</th><th>Trend vs. Prior Month</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Total propositioner (session)</td><td>272</td><td>↑ +30 since March 12</td></tr><tr><td>Total betankanden fetched</td><td>50</td><td>Spring peak</td></tr><tr><td>Total motioner (session)</td><td>4,098</td><td>Active opposition cycle</td></tr><tr><td>Interpellationer filed (last 30 days)</td><td>41</td><td>↑ High opposition scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td>Written questions (last 30 days)</td><td>~80 est.</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional amendments (vilande)</td><td>2</td><td>Notable</td></tr><tr><td>Budget propositions tabled</td><td>4</td><td>Spring budget package</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-dominant-policy-themes">Dominant Policy Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dominant-policy-themes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dominant-policy-themes">Dominant Policy Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dominant-policy-themes"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((April 2026 Parliament))
     FISCAL POLICY
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-dominant-policy-themes">Dominant Policy Themes<a class="" aria-hidden
       Ukraine tribunal HD03231
       Arms export HD03114</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days">Party Activity Analysis (Last 30 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days">Party Activity Analysis (Last 30 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -815,44 +815,44 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-activity-analysis-last-30-days">Party Activity Analysis (Last 3
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Notable Actions</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>M</strong> (Moderaterna)</td><td>Government lead</td><td>Budget leadership, energy/climate</td><td>Central to coalition cohesion</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong> (Sverigedemokraterna)</td><td>Government partner</td><td>Crime legislation, deportation</td><td>Pushed double-penalty criminal bill</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong> (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td>Government support</td><td>Social policy, civil services</td><td>Guardianship reform support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong> (Liberalerna)</td><td>Government support</td><td>E-ID, transparency, gender equality</td><td>Wage transparency questioned</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong> (Socialdemokraterna)</td><td>Main opposition</td><td>25+ interpellations, women's shelters</td><td>Active legislative scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Social insurance, forestry opposition</td><td>Voted against forestry bill</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong> (Centerpartiet)</td><td>Mixed/constructive</td><td>E-ID support, NATO presence</td><td>Supported key security bills</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> (Miljöpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Anti-fuel-tax cut, environment</td><td>Opposed extra budget HD03236</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's economy grew at <strong>0.82%</strong> in 2024 — recovering from a -0.20% contraction in 2023 but significantly trailing Denmark (<strong>3.5%</strong>), Norway (<strong>2.1%</strong>), and the EU average. Unemployment hit <strong>8.7%</strong> in 2025, among the highest in the Nordic region. Inflation fell dramatically to <strong>2.84%</strong> in 2024 from a crisis peak of 8.55% in 2023. GDP per capita reached <strong>USD 57,117</strong> in 2024.</p>
 <p>The government's extra change budget (HD03236) cutting fuel taxes and providing energy support directly responds to household cost pressures — a clear electoral move with only five months to the September 2026 vote.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-tiers">Significance Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-tiers"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-1--national-significance">Tier 1 — National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--national-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-tiers">Significance Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-tiers"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-1--national-significance">Tier 1 — National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--national-significance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03100</strong> Spring Proposition 2026 — frames entire government economic strategy</li>
 <li><strong>HD03236</strong> Extra budget — fuel taxes + energy support (immediate household impact)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03218</strong> Double penalties for criminal networks (major criminal justice reform)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03220</strong> NATO Finland contribution (national security commitment)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-2--major-policy">Tier 2 — Major Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--major-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-2--major-policy">Tier 2 — Major Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--major-policy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03238</strong> New environmental permit authority (institutional restructuring)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03245</strong> National violence against women strategy</li>
 <li><strong>HD03217</strong> Extended civil servant criminal liability</li>
 <li><strong>HD03246</strong> Stricter youth offender rules</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical">Tier 3 — Procedural/Technical<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical">Tier 3 — Procedural/Technical<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--proceduraltechnical"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28</strong> National condominium register</li>
 <li><strong>HD01CU27</strong> Property identity requirements</li>
 <li><strong>HD01KU32/33</strong> Constitutional changes (vilande — require post-election confirmation)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Budget season with fuel tax cuts is clearly electorally motivated. The September 2026 election means every major legislative action from April through September carries campaign weight.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM confidence — Current coalition appears stable. SD's crime agenda being legislated keeps SD aligned. L's support for e-ID and digital transparency pleases liberals. Risk: MP and V energized by environmental rollbacks could galvanize left-green voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Crime (double penalties) and cost of living (fuel tax) are polling as top concerns. Women's shelter crisis (HD10438) creates visible S ammunition.</p>
 <p><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — Government exposed on: (1) women's shelter closures, (2) sluggish economic growth vs. Nordic peers, (3) active forestry deregulation facing environmental opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong>: 🟦 VERY HIGH confidence that this spring session shapes the campaign agenda: the government has staked its identity on crime reduction and economic relief.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>Significance scored on three dimensions:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Legislative Impact</strong> (0-10): Constitutional/structural vs. procedural/technical</li>
@@ -861,14 +861,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 </ul>
 <p>Final score = weighted average (0.4 × Legislative + 0.3 × Public + 0.3 × Electoral)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-15-documents-by-significance">Top 15 Documents by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-15-documents-by-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-15-documents-by-significance">Top 15 Documents by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-15-documents-by-significance"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Document Significance Scores (Top 10)"
     x-axis ["HD03100", "HD03236", "HD03218", "HD03220", "HD03245", "HD03246", "HD03238", "HD10438", "HD03242", "HD03217"]
     y-axis "Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [9.2, 9.0, 8.8, 8.3, 8.1, 8.0, 7.5, 7.4, 7.2, 7.1]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-scores">Detailed Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-scores">Detailed Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-detailed-scores">Detailed Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Legislative</th><th>Public</th><th>Electoral</th><th>Final</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.2</strong></td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.8</strong></td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td>7</td><td><strong>8.1</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.5</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>4</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.4</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.2</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.1</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>4</td><td><strong>5.8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>7</td><td>5</td><td>3</td><td><strong>5.2</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>5.2</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>4</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>5.2</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>5.1</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monthly-significance-index">Monthly Significance Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-significance-index"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monthly-significance-index">Monthly Significance Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monthly-significance-index"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>This month's significance level</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (score: 8.1/10)</p>
 <p><strong>Factors elevating significance</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -1027,12 +1027,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-monthly-significance-index">Monthly Significance Index<a class="" ari
 <li>April 2026: HIGH (8.1) — spring peak ✓</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Minimum perspectives required</strong>: 7 (deep depth)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((April 2026 Stakeholders))
     Government Coalition
@@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
       Trafficking Victims
       Condominium Owners</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl">Perspective 1: Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl">Perspective 1: Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Satisfied with April productivity<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Electoral positioning, crime reduction, fiscal prudence with relief<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: The spring package delivers on all four coalition partners' priority lists:</p>
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-1-government-coalition-msdkdl">Perspective 1: Government
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: Moderate voters relieved by fuel tax cuts; conservative base satisfied with crime bills<br>
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Women's shelter crisis creates visible S attack surface that KD in particular may find uncomfortable given its Christian social values platform</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s">Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s">Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Actively confrontational but constructive on security<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Welfare state integrity, workers' rights, regional equity<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: S is in effective pre-campaign mode. The 25+ interpellations in 30 days — on topics ranging from women's shelters (HD10438) to the Folke Bernadotte murder anniversary (HD10435) to housing in Stockholm (HD10434) to broad tax reform (HD10433) — constitute a deliberate narrative-building exercise. S supported NATO Finland contribution (HD03220) bipartisanly, demonstrating security credibility.</p>
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-2-social-democrats-s">Perspective 2: Social Democrats (S)
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: Core S message: "Government builds prisons while closing shelters"<br>
 <strong>Vulnerability</strong>: S must distance from perceived economic incompetence of 2021–2022 inflation surge under their watch</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd">Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd">Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Delivering on core programme through coalition<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Crime reduction, immigration restriction, national security<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: SD's legislative fingerprints are visible on two flagship bills: double penalties for criminal networks (HD03218) and stricter youth offender rules (HD03246). Both were SD priorities in coalition negotiations. The interpellation on mosque extremism (HD10430) signals SD continuing to shape the debate agenda from inside the coalition orbit.</p>
@@ -1094,28 +1094,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-3-sweden-democrats-sd">Perspective 3: Sweden Democrats (S
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: SD consolidating right-of-centre crime voters; risk of losing voters to KD on social issues if welfare state perception hardens<br>
 <strong>Risk</strong>: September election polling will determine whether SD holds current ~20% share or loses ground to M</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c">Perspective 4: Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c">Perspective 4: Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-4-centerpartiet-c"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Selective constructive opposition<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Rural business, entrepreneurship, personal liberty, NATO<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: C supported the NATO Finland contribution (HD03220) and the e-ID initiative (TU21) but has expressed reservations about active forestry deregulation details and women's shelter closures. C's positioning as a "liberal conscience" of Swedish politics means it is increasingly differentiating from both the government coalition and the S-led opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: Interpellations on international LGBTQ+ rights (HD10431 from C), constructive security votes<br>
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: C aims to recover from 2022 below-4% scare; rural business voters attracted by forestry deregulation</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp">Perspective 5: Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp">Perspective 5: Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-5-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Principled opposition on environment and climate<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Green transition, social justice, EU alignment<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: MP filed a motion directly opposing the extra budget fuel tax cut (HD024098), positioning itself as the uncompromising green option. MP's parliamentary group voted against the active forestry bill and the renewable energy permit changes. This positions MP to capture protest votes from climate-motivated centre-left voters who feel S has compromised too much on environment.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: HD024098 (motion opposing fuel tax cut), consistent committee votes against deregulation<br>
 <strong>Electoral calculation</strong>: MP needs to reach 4% threshold in September 2026 — green mobilisation depends on environment being top-of-mind for voters</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv">Perspective 6: Business Community / Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv">Perspective 6: Business Community / Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-6-business-community--confederation-of-swedish-enterprise-svenskt-näringsliv"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Generally supportive of April package<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Regulatory simplification, digital infrastructure, labour market flexibility<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: The business community welcomes the new environmental permit agency (HD03238) if it genuinely reduces permitting backlogs (currently 3–5 years for major industrial projects). The data interoperability proposition (HD03244) is welcomed as reducing administrative burden. Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) benefits timber companies. Energy price support (HD03236) reduces operational cost pressure.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: HD03238 (permit agency), HD03244 (interoperability), HD03240 (electricity law)<br>
 <strong>Concern</strong>: Double civil servant liability (HD03217) creates regulatory uncertainty for public procurement interactions</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations">Perspective 7: Women's Rights and Civil Society Organisations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations">Perspective 7: Women's Rights and Civil Society Organisations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Alarmed — between legislative progress and implementation failures<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Protection funding, wage equality, violence prevention<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: April 2026 presents a cruel paradox for women's rights advocates: the government tabled a National Strategy against Men's Violence (HD03245) on April 14 while women's shelters are closing across the country (interpellation HD10438 filed April 17). Wage transparency directive progress (interpellation HD10437) is stalled. The tax authority demanding back-taxes from trafficking victims (HD11719) represents a systemic failure of state protection.</p>
@@ -1123,14 +1123,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-perspective-7-womens-rights-and-civil-society-organisations">Perspect
 <strong>Demand</strong>: Ring-fenced funding in autumn budget for shelter operations; immediate halt to prosecution of trafficking victims for tax arrears<br>
 <strong>Electoral mobilisation</strong>: High potential — women's rights issues have strong social media resonance; S and MP will amplify</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner">Perspective 8: Swedish Local Government / SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner">Perspective 8: Swedish Local Government / SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-perspective-8-swedish-local-government--skr-sveriges-kommuner-och-regioner"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Stance</strong>: Concerned about unfunded mandates and service withdrawals<br>
 <strong>Key interests</strong>: Municipal finance, service delivery standards, regional development<br>
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: Multiple April propositions create implementation challenges for municipalities: paid police training (HD03237) requires coordination, new reception law (HD03229 — motions HD024080-89) imposes integration obligations, national violence strategy requires local co-funding. HD11718 (state service withdrawal from southeastern Skåne) illustrates the broader problem of national government retreating from peripheral communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Critical evidence</strong>: HD11718 (Skåne service withdrawal), HD024080-89 (reception law motions), HD01CU22 (guardianship — local authority implications)<br>
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Municipal election results in 2026 may see urban-rural divide exploited by all parties</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>File-ID</strong></td><td>SCN-2026-M04</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td><code>monthly-review</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Horizon</strong></td><td>30 days · 90 days · post-Sep 2026 election (13-month look-forward)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) · probability bands · monitoring-trigger calendar</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Upstream Probability Anchor</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-framework-overview">Framework Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framework-overview">Framework Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framework-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A[April 2026 Legislative Cluster&#x3C;br/>Spring Trilogy + Crime Bloc + KU32/33 + NATO eFP + Env Deregulation] --> T1{30-day Trigger&#x3C;br/>Lagrådet KU33 yttrande}
     A --> T2{90-day Trigger&#x3C;br/>EU Commission forestry response}
@@ -1181,8 +1181,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-framework-overview">Framework Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     S_C --> O_C[Budget STALEMATE · KU32/33 LAPSES · Crime MAINTAINED]</pre>
 <p>Probabilities sum to 100 % (three base scenarios) + wildcard overlays; aligned to the weekly-review anchor (2026-04-18) with the monthly-scope adjustment noted in the ACH grid below.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium">Scenario A — Tidö-koalitionen Re-elected (Probability: <strong>42 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability">Trigger conditions (signals that raise this scenario's probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium">Scenario A — Tidö-koalitionen Re-elected (Probability: <strong>42 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--tidö-koalitionen-re-elected-probability-42---confidence--medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability">Trigger conditions (signals that raise this scenario's probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Opinion polls retain M+SD+KD+L ≥ 175 seats by August 2026</li>
 <li>Q3-2026 macro release shows GDP growth ≥ 1.5 % (vs 0.82 % 2024)</li>
@@ -1190,33 +1190,33 @@ <h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions-signals-that-raise-this-scenarios-probability">Tri
 <li>No major SÄPO-acknowledged Russian hybrid incident</li>
 <li>Fuel-tax cut <code>HD03236</code> reaches households before August 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><code>HD03100</code> + <code>HD0399</code> + <code>HD03236</code> clear chamber (2026-04-22 Extra budget vote passes bloc-vote 175–174)</li>
 <li><code>HD03218</code> double-penalty law passes first reading with expected SD-kingmaker discipline</li>
 <li><code>HD10438</code> women's-shelter interpellation answered without emergency supplemental</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Lagrådet KU33 yttrande <strong>silent</strong> on narrow interpretation → government proceeds unchanged</li>
 <li><code>HD03242</code> active forestry: EU Commission issues letter-of-formal-notice; government defends on subsidiarity</li>
 <li><code>HD03220</code> NATO eFP Bn-task-group deploys to Finland (July 2026) without incident</li>
 <li><code>HD03231</code> / <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission: chamber approval with ≥ 300 MPs</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026-"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>KU32/KU33 <strong>CONFIRMED</strong> in second reading by new Riksdag (bloc vote ≥ 175)</li>
 <li>Tidöavtalet 2.0 negotiations open — expanded deportation + migration-tightening mandate</li>
 <li><code>HD03218</code> expanded to additional offence categories by end-2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Raise probability to 50 %+</strong> if: Q2 inflation &#x3C; 2.5 % AND unemployment &#x3C; 8.5 % AND no SÄPO hybrid incident</li>
 <li><strong>Lower probability to 35 %</strong> if: shelter crisis unresolved AND V+MP+S cross-party motion wins C swing vote</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium">Scenario B — S-led Government (Probability: <strong>33 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium">Scenario B — S-led Government (Probability: <strong>33 %</strong> · Confidence 🟧 MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--s-led-government-probability-33---confidence--medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-conditions">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S regains ≥ 30 % polling (from ≈ 26 % April 2026 baseline)</li>
 <li>Women's-shelter crisis (<code>HD10438</code>) dominates August campaign coverage</li>
@@ -1224,19 +1224,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>C refuses to enter Tidö-koalitionen after the election</li>
 <li>V delivers parliamentary support tolerance (confidence-and-supply, not formal coalition)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1">30-day policy trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S + V + MP + C coordinated motion on women's-shelter emergency funding tests coalition discipline</li>
 <li>S files counter-motion to <code>HD03236</code> reframing fuel-tax cut as regressive household-transfer</li>
 <li>Magdalena Andersson leverages HD10438 as campaign-defining attack vector</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1">90-day policy trajectory (through July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-90-day-policy-trajectory-through-july-2026-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S tables comprehensive counter-budget for 2027 (pre-election)</li>
 <li>Forestry <code>HD03242</code> passes but V + MP mobilisation becomes organising framework for the left bloc</li>
 <li><code>HD03217</code> civil-servant liability becomes union/LO mobilisation vector</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026 +)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU32/KU33 FAIL</strong> second reading — grundlag change lapses (political cost: zero; status quo ante)</li>
 <li><code>HD03242</code> active forestry <strong>REVERSED</strong> — species-inventory compromise (Finland model)</li>
@@ -1246,26 +1246,26 @@ <h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026--1">Post-election policy tra
 <li>Criminal-justice bloc (<code>HD03218</code> + <code>HD03246</code>) <strong>maintained</strong> — cross-party support (rehabilitation supplements added)</li>
 <li>NATO commitments (<code>HD03220</code>) <strong>maintained</strong> — bipartisan foreign-policy consensus since 2024</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Raise probability to 40 %+</strong> if: shelter crisis × fuel-tax regressivity attack-line breaks through by July</li>
 <li><strong>Lower probability to 25 %</strong> if: Q3-2026 macro outperforms + no new hybrid incident</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low">Scenario C — Hung Parliament / Coalition Negotiations (Probability: <strong>22 %</strong> · Confidence 🟥 LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-trigger-conditions-1">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low">Scenario C — Hung Parliament / Coalition Negotiations (Probability: <strong>22 %</strong> · Confidence 🟥 LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--hung-parliament--coalition-negotiations-probability-22---confidence--low"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-trigger-conditions-1">Trigger conditions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-conditions-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Neither Tidö-bloc nor S+V+MP+C coalition clears 175 seats</li>
 <li>SD strong enough (≥ 22 %) to demand formal government role; C refuses</li>
 <li>L drops below 4 % threshold (coalition-arithmetic shock)</li>
 <li>Novus + SIFO average within ± 3 points of both blocs in the final week</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign">30-day policy trajectory (during election campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign">30-day policy trajectory (during election campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-policy-trajectory-during-election-campaign"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>All major legislative files proceed — campaign-trail coverage intensifies, chamber behaviour unchanged</li>
 <li>Parties position for post-election negotiating leverage</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026–Dec 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026">Post-election policy trajectory (Sep 2026–Dec 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Budget-negotiation stalemate consumes Q4 2026 — statsminister-omröstning may require 3–5 attempts</li>
 <li><code>HD03218</code> criminal-network law already enacted pre-election — <strong>MAINTAINED</strong> (cross-party consensus)</li>
@@ -1274,13 +1274,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-post-election-policy-trajectory-sep-2026dec-2026">Post-election polic
 <li>Women's-shelter emergency funding passed as <strong>coalition-formation concession</strong> (likely)</li>
 <li><code>HD03231</code> / <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal accession <strong>MAINTAINED</strong> — cross-party</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Confidence indicators to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Raise probability to 30 %+</strong> if: L drops below 4 % in August polling AND C publicly rules out both blocs</li>
 <li><strong>Lower probability to 15 %</strong> if: one bloc consolidates > 47 % polling by early September</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high">Wildcard W-1 — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Escalation (Probability: <strong>8 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high">Wildcard W-1 — Russian Hybrid-Warfare Escalation (Probability: <strong>8 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impact-high"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: SÄPO-confirmed major cyber/hybrid incident attributable to Russia, timed to:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>The 2026-Q3 Bn-task-group deployment to Finland, OR</li>
@@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-1--russian-hybrid-warfare-escalation-probability-8---impac
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Monitoring triggers</strong>: SÄPO quarterly-threat-assessment publication; MSB annual resilience-audit; Försvarsmakten signals-intelligence bulletins (unclass.)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high">Wildcard W-2 — Early Election / No-Confidence Vote (Probability: <strong>5 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high">Wildcard W-2 — Early Election / No-Confidence Vote (Probability: <strong>5 %</strong> · Impact: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impact-high"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: Coalition partner (most likely L given press-freedom / KU33 tensions) withdraws support on a specific grundlag paragraph → cabinet-confidence test.</p>
 <p><strong>Impact on scenarios</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-wildcard-w-2--early-election--no-confidence-vote-probability-5---impa
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Monitoring triggers</strong>: Public L party-board statements on KU33 interpretation; Lagrådet yttrande language; any L minister resignation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h3>
 <p>Legend: ✅ consistent · ⚠️ ambiguous · ❌ inconsistent</p>
 
 
@@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence (April 2026)</th><th align="center">H-A: Tidö re-elected</th><th align="center">H-B: S-led</th><th align="center">H-C: Hung</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Spring fuel-tax cut <code>HD03236</code> tabled 4 weeks before poll window</td><td align="center">✅ (household relief)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (attackable as regressive)</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>HD03236</td></tr><tr><td>Women's-shelter closures + <code>HD10438</code> interpellation filed</td><td align="center">⚠️ (attackable)</td><td align="center">✅ (campaign vector)</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>41 interpellations / 30 days — highest monthly rate of session</td><td align="center">⚠️ (opposition energy signal)</td><td align="center">✅ (scrutiny capacity)</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>Interpellations log</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal-justice bloc operational, SD-aligned</td><td align="center">✅ (SD-loyalty reward)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (cross-party acceptance)</td><td align="center">✅ (crime cross-party)</td><td>HD03218/HD03246/HD03217</td></tr><tr><td>NATO operational deployment <code>HD03220</code></td><td align="center">✅ (security-competence)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (maintained but not owned)</td><td align="center">✅ (cross-party)</td><td>HD03220</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine tribunal <code>HD03231</code> + reparations <code>HD03232</code></td><td align="center">✅ (norm entrepreneurship)</td><td align="center">✅ (S-compatible)</td><td align="center">✅ (cross-party)</td><td>HD03231/HD03232</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental deregulation package (forestry/wind/permit/electricity)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (left-bloc mobiliser)</td><td align="center">✅ (opposition organising frame)</td><td align="center">⚠️ (stalls in coalition negotiations)</td><td>HD03238/39/40/42</td></tr><tr><td>KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em> → election as referendum</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌ (coalition-arithmetic breaks)</td><td>HD01KU32/33</td></tr><tr><td>GDP 0.82 % 2024 vs Nordics 2–3.5 %</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment 8.7 % 2025</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation 2.84 % 2024 (stabilised from 8.55 %)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>L declining polling + press-freedom friction</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td align="center">✅ (trigger for W-2)</td><td>Opinion polls + KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>ACH inconsistency count</strong> (❌): H-A = 0 · H-B = 1 · H-C = 2 → <strong>H-B most internally consistent with April-2026 evidence</strong>, but <strong>H-A has highest prior</strong> from coalition-discipline voting record; net probability favours H-A by a narrow margin (≈ 9 points) — consistent with the 42 % / 33 % / 22 % base.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar (Mapped to Scenario Shifts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar-mapped-to-scenario-shifts">Monitoring-Tri
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Trigger Event</th><th>Scenario Shift Rules</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Chamber vote on <code>HD03236</code> Extra budget</td><td>Pass 175–174 bloc vote → H-A ↑ 2 · Pass with defections → H-C ↑ 3</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-27</td><td>KU annual granskning open</td><td>Major disclosure → H-B ↑ 3</td></tr><tr><td>Early May</td><td><code>HD03218</code> double-penalty first-reading vote</td><td>SD-kingmaker visibility → H-A ↑ 1</td></tr><tr><td>Mid May</td><td><code>HD03242</code> forestry first-reading</td><td>Pass with L defection → H-C ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td><strong>Lagrådet KU33 yttrande</strong></td><td>Strict → H-B ↑ 5 · Silent → H-A ↑ 3 · Ambiguous → H-C ↑ 2</td></tr><tr><td>Late May</td><td>Q1-2026 macro release (SCB)</td><td>GDP > 1.5 % → H-A ↑ 3 · &#x3C; 0.5 % → H-B ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>June 2026</td><td>EU Commission forestry letter-of-formal-notice</td><td>Issued → H-B ↑ 2 + W-1 no-change</td></tr><tr><td>June 2026</td><td><strong>Chamber vote HD03231/HD03232</strong></td><td>Cross-party ≥ 300 MPs → H-A/B/C all stable</td></tr><tr><td>July 2026</td><td>Women's-shelter emergency-funding decision</td><td>Funded → H-A ↑ 2 · Refused → H-B ↑ 5</td></tr><tr><td>2026-Q3</td><td>eFP Bn-task-group deployment start</td><td>Incident-free → H-A ↑ 2 · Incident → W-1 triggered</td></tr><tr><td>August 2026</td><td>Q2 2026 macro release</td><td>GDP > 1.7 % → H-A ↑ 4</td></tr><tr><td>Early Sep</td><td>Final-week polling Novus + SIFO</td><td>Within ± 3 both blocs → H-C ↑ 6</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td><strong>Election Day</strong></td><td>Result crystallises H-A/B/C</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-24</td><td>First post-election Riksdag</td><td>KU32/33 confirmation window opens — H-A → CONFIRMED, H-B/C → LAPSES</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Probability bands <strong>aligned</strong> to <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> base of 45 % / 35 % / 20 %, adjusted to <strong>42 % / 33 % / 22 %</strong> on the monthly scope reflecting: (a) visible shelter-crisis attack-vector maturation (H-B +1), (b) arithmetic widening for hung-parliament (H-C +2), (c) corresponding H-A narrowing (-3). Every departure justified per <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"Probability alignment".</li>
 <li>Wildcards <strong>inherited</strong> from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> with monthly-scope probability adjustment (W-1: 6 % → 8 %; W-2: 4 % → 5 %) as eFP-deployment window approaches.</li>
@@ -1497,19 +1497,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" a
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence Assessment</strong>: Base-scenario probabilities — 🟧 MEDIUM · Wildcards — 🟥 LOW (inherent tail-risk uncertainty) · Monitoring triggers — 🟩 HIGH (calendar anchored to concrete procedural events).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Risk Framework</strong>: NIST CSF / Political Risk Matrix</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Political Risk Matrix — April 2026"
     x-axis ["Very Low", "Low", "Medium", "High", "Very High"]
     y-axis "Impact Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [1, 3, 6, 9, 8]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1605,18 +1605,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk Description</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>Score</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01</td><td>Coalition fracture before Sept 2026 election</td><td>LOW</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>6/10</td><td>Crime/budget package unifies coalition</td></tr><tr><td>R-02</td><td>Economic growth stall — GDP below 1% in 2025</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>7/10</td><td>Extra budget stimulus; Riksbank rate policy</td></tr><tr><td>R-03</td><td>Women's shelter crisis escalation — media pressure</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>7/10</td><td>National violence strategy (HD03245) announced</td></tr><tr><td>R-04</td><td>Environmental EU infringement (forestry HD03242)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>7/10</td><td>Monitoring EU reaction; legal review</td></tr><tr><td>R-05</td><td>NATO Finland cost overrun (HD03220)</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td>5/10</td><td>Budget allocation in vårändringsbudget</td></tr><tr><td>R-06</td><td>Youth offender recidivism despite HD03246</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5/10</td><td>Rehabilitation components in bill</td></tr><tr><td>R-07</td><td>Constitutional change (HD01KU32/33) rejection post-election</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td><td>4/10</td><td>Vilande process requires new parliament confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>R-08</td><td>Digital infrastructure security (e-ID, HD03244)</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td>5/10</td><td>Government security review; NCSC oversight</td></tr><tr><td>R-09</td><td>Wage transparency non-compliance (HD10437)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5/10</td><td>EU enforcement mechanism still being finalised</td></tr><tr><td>R-10</td><td>Regional service withdrawal backlash (HD11718)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td><td>4/10</td><td>Limited political capital to reverse</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-risk-analysis">Top Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall">R-02: Economic Growth Stall<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-risk-analysis">Top Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall">R-02: Economic Growth Stall<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02-economic-growth-stall"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth at 0.82% in 2024 recovering from -0.20% contraction is fragile. Unemployment at 8.7% in 2025 exceeds the Nordic average. The extra budget fuel tax cut (HD03236) is a short-term stimulus that does not address structural competitiveness gaps. If the Riksbank holds rates elevated into Q3 2026, housing investment and consumer spending may remain suppressed through the election.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 45% | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: GDP below 0.5% in 2025 triggers fiscal stimulus debate</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis">R-03: Women's Shelter Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis">R-03: Women's Shelter Crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-womens-shelter-crisis"></a></h4>
 <p>The interpellation on women's shelter closures (HD10438) from S signals a politically charged welfare issue. Dozens of shelters across Sweden have closed due to municipal funding cuts. The national violence strategy (HD03245) passed in April but is a framework without immediate ring-fenced funding. Social media amplification potential is high.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 70% | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: Major opposition campaign issue from May–September 2026</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement">R-04: EU Environmental Infringement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement">R-04: EU Environmental Infringement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-eu-environmental-infringement"></a></h4>
 <p>Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) removing restrictions on clear-cutting and species protection in productive forests risks EU Taxonomy non-compliance and potential infringement proceedings under the EU Biodiversity Strategy. Sweden's forestry industry generates approximately 3% of GDP — conflict between economic and environmental interests.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 35% | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: EU formal notice, international reputation damage</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-stability-assessment">Political Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-stability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-stability-assessment">Political Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-stability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gauge
     title "Coalition Stability Index — April 2026"
     accDescr "Coalition stability measured 0-100"
@@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-stability-assessment">Political Stability Assessment<a clas
     "Stability" : 72</pre>
 <p><strong>Overall assessment</strong>: Coalition STABLE through election. Budget discipline, crime agenda alignment, and electoral incentives keep M–SD–KD–L unified. Primary risk is any SD demand that L or KD cannot accept in the final pre-election session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale">Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale">Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1660,12 +1660,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-levels-5-point-scale">Confidence Levels (5-Point Scale)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assessment Area</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative volume assessment</td><td>🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Economic trend analysis</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral impact predictions</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>EU compliance risks</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition stability 6-month</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election scenarios</td><td>🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review<br>
 <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: deep (5+ stakeholder perspectives per quadrant)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix-overview">SWOT Matrix Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix-overview">SWOT Matrix Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT — Swedish Parliament April 2026
     x-axis Negative --> Positive
@@ -1683,8 +1683,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-matrix-overview">SWOT Matrix Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     Green Transition Investment: [0.70, 0.28]
     Election 2026 Pressure: [0.35, 0.22]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective">1. Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective">1. Government Coalition (M–SD–KD–L Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Delivered a comprehensive spring budget package (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236) on schedule</li>
 <li>Criminal justice reform (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217) demonstrates legislative discipline across coalition partners</li>
@@ -1692,125 +1692,125 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-government-coalition-msdkdl-perspective">1. Government Coalition (M
 <li>New environmental agency (HD03238) signals institutional modernisation while controlling environmental costs</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: 272 propositions in 2025/26 session; HD03236 passed FiU by April 14</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective">2. Opposition Parties (S, V, MP Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective">2. Opposition Parties (S, V, MP Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-opposition-parties-s-v-mp-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Social Democrats produced 25+ interpellations in 30 days demonstrating active parliamentary scrutiny</li>
 <li>Women's shelter closures (HD10438) and wage transparency (HD10437) create high-visibility attack vectors</li>
 <li>MP successfully branded extra budget (HD03236) as anti-climate, mobilising green base</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024098 (MP motion against fuel tax cut), HD10437–HD10438 (S interpellations)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-democratic-institutions">3. Democratic Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-democratic-institutions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-democratic-institutions">3. Democratic Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-democratic-institutions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Constitutional amendments properly processed as "vilande" (HD01KU32, HD01KU33) — system integrity maintained</li>
 <li>Committee system processed 50 betankanden in the spring surge without backlog</li>
 <li>Property rights strengthened: condominium register (HD01CU28) and ID requirements (HD01CU27) improve housing market transparency</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-economic-policy-framework">4. Economic Policy Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-economic-policy-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-economic-policy-framework">4. Economic Policy Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-economic-policy-framework"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Inflation reduced from 8.5% (2023) to 2.84% (2024) — monetary policy normalising</li>
 <li>GDP per capita at USD 57,117 — solid base despite slow growth</li>
 <li>Energy price support mechanism (HD03236) provides household relief amid elevated energy costs</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-digital-governance">5. Digital Governance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-digital-governance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-digital-governance">5. Digital Governance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-digital-governance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>State e-ID bill (TU21) passed — major milestone for digital public services</li>
 <li>Data interoperability for public sector (HD03244) modernises government infrastructure</li>
 <li>Both initiatives align with EU Digital Single Market requirements</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective">1. Economic Performance (Citizen/Household Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective">1. Economic Performance (Citizen/Household Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-economic-performance-citizenhousehold-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>GDP growth at 0.82% (2024) severely lags Denmark (3.5%), Norway (2.1%), and EU average</li>
 <li>Unemployment at 8.7% (2025) — highest in five years, disproportionately affecting youth</li>
 <li>Fuel tax cut in extra budget is fiscal stimulus, not structural reform</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: World Bank indicators SWE 2024 vs. DNK 2024</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society">2. Gender Policy (Women's Rights Advocates, Civil Society)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society">2. Gender Policy (Women's Rights Advocates, Civil Society)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-gender-policy-womens-rights-advocates-civil-society"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Women's shelter closure wave (HD10438 interpellation) reveals funding gap between national violence strategy (HD03245) and local implementation</li>
 <li>Wage gap persisting despite EU directive pressure (HD10437) — enforcement mechanism weak</li>
 <li>State strategic violence prevention strategy passed legislatively but opposition questions resource allocation</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders">3. Environmental Governance (Environmental Organisations, Green Economy Stakeholders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders">3. Environmental Governance (Environmental Organisations, Green Economy Stakeholders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmental-governance-environmental-organisations-green-economy-stakeholders"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) risks EU Taxonomy and biodiversity commitments</li>
 <li>Wind power municipal reform (HD03239) introduces local veto risk, potentially slowing green transition</li>
 <li>New environmental permit agency (HD03238) raises efficiency questions — whether streamlining helps or weakens environmental protection</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities">4. Regional Disparities (Local Government, Rural Communities)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities">4. Regional Disparities (Local Government, Rural Communities)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-regional-disparities-local-government-rural-communities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Closure of state service offices in peripheral areas (HD11718 — southeastern Skåne question)</li>
 <li>Municipal harbour reform (TU19) centralises port governance, raising concerns for smaller coastal municipalities</li>
 <li>Police education reform (HD03237) — whether paying police training will improve rural recruitment unclear</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition">5. Constitutional Process (Legal Scholars, Opposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition">5. Constitutional Process (Legal Scholars, Opposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-constitutional-process-legal-scholars-opposition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Two constitutional changes (HD01KU32, KU33) approved as "vilande" — means post-2026 election parliament must confirm, creating policy uncertainty</li>
 <li>Digital records privacy in criminal investigations (HD01KU33) raises press freedom concerns</li>
 <li>Accessibility requirements for media (HD01KU32) welcomed by disability rights groups</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition">1. Electoral Positioning (Government Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition">1. Electoral Positioning (Government Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-positioning-government-coalition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Crime package (HD03218 double penalties, HD03246 youth, HD03217 civil servants) directly addresses top voter priority</li>
 <li>Fuel tax cut (HD03236) delivers tangible pre-election relief to households</li>
 <li>NATO contribution (HD03220) demonstrates security responsibility ahead of September vote</li>
 <li>Window to consolidate government record before election campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context">2. Green Industrial Strategy (Business Sector, EU Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context">2. Green Industrial Strategy (Business Sector, EU Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-green-industrial-strategy-business-sector-eu-context"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>New electricity system law (HD03240) enables renewable energy expansion</li>
 <li>Environmental permit agency reform (HD03238) could attract clean-tech investment if streamlined effectively</li>
 <li>Swedish wind energy potential if municipality reform (HD03239) strikes right balance</li>
 <li>Green Taxonomy-aligned investments could boost sluggish GDP</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective">3. Nordic Economic Integration (Business, Nordic Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective">3. Nordic Economic Integration (Business, Nordic Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-nordic-economic-integration-business-nordic-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's GDP per capita (USD 57,117) remains competitive despite slow growth</li>
 <li>Housing market reforms (HD01CU28, HD01CU27) improve property rights transparency — foreign investment attractiveness</li>
 <li>Digital infrastructure (e-ID, data interoperability) positions Sweden for digital economy leadership</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective">4. Ukraine/International Leadership (Diplomatic, EU Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective">4. Ukraine/International Leadership (Diplomatic, EU Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-ukraineinternational-leadership-diplomatic-eu-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Special tribunal accession (HD03231) builds international rule-of-law credentials</li>
 <li>NATO Finland contribution strengthens Nordic defence cooperation</li>
 <li>Arms export control modernisation (HD03114) balances security and democratic accountability</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective">5. Social Cohesion Reform (Academic, Think-Tank Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective">5. Social Cohesion Reform (Academic, Think-Tank Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-cohesion-reform-academic-think-tank-perspective"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Guardianship reform (HD01CU22) strengthens legal protections for vulnerable individuals</li>
 <li>New violence prevention strategy (HD03245) aligns with EU gender equality commitments</li>
 <li>Wage transparency directive implementation creates structural market correction opportunity</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts">1. Electoral Volatility (Political Risk Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts">1. Electoral Volatility (Political Risk Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-electoral-volatility-political-risk-analysts"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Five months to September 2026 election — legislative agenda increasingly campaign-driven</li>
 <li>SD maintains legislative influence without formal government membership — creates accountability opacity</li>
 <li>Opposition unified on cost-of-living and welfare issues; government fiscal conservatism may face backlash</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts">2. Economic Deterioration Risk (Economists, Fiscal Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts">2. Economic Deterioration Risk (Economists, Fiscal Analysts)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-economic-deterioration-risk-economists-fiscal-analysts"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden's GDP growth (0.82%) cannot sustain high unemployment (8.7%) without fiscal stimulus</li>
 <li>Extra budget fuel tax cuts reduce revenue without structural employment improvements</li>
 <li>Risk of "stagflation light" if energy prices spike again post-support programme</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions">3. Environmental/Climate Commitments (EU, International Institutions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions">3. Environmental/Climate Commitments (EU, International Institutions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-environmentalclimate-commitments-eu-international-institutions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Active forestry deregulation (HD03242) risks EU infringement proceedings</li>
 <li>Wind power municipal veto (HD03239) may undermine Sweden's EU renewable energy targets</li>
 <li>Climate credibility gap threatens Nordic leadership position</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context">4. Security Escalation (Defence Analysts, NATO Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context">4. Security Escalation (Defence Analysts, NATO Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-security-escalation-defence-analysts-nato-context"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>NATO forward presence in Finland (HD03220) — cost trajectory unclear</li>
 <li>Civil preparedness legislation in pipeline — significant budgetary implications</li>
 <li>Any Baltic security deterioration could overwhelm planned defence spending (spring budget)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media">5. Social Fragmentation (Social Policy Researchers, Media)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media">5. Social Fragmentation (Social Policy Researchers, Media)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Women's shelter closures (HD10438) signal civil society funding squeeze</li>
 <li>Youth unemployment elevated — stricter penalties for young offenders (HD03246) without parallel rehabilitation investment risks recidivism</li>
@@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-social-fragmentation-social-policy-researchers-media">5. Social Fra
 <li>Regional public service withdrawal (southeastern Skåne HD11718) deepens urban-rural divide</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1892,12 +1892,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Primary Concern</th><th>Outlook</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government Coalition</td><td>Electoral positioning</td><td>Cautiously optimistic</td><td>Crime + budget package</td></tr><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>Accountability + welfare</td><td>Active opposition mode</td><td>41 interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>SD Supporters</td><td>Crime, immigration</td><td>Satisfied</td><td>HD03218 double penalties</td></tr><tr><td>Women's Rights Orgs</td><td>Shelter closures, wage gap</td><td>Alarmed</td><td>HD10438, HD10437</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental NGOs</td><td>Forestry, wind power</td><td>Critical</td><td>HD03242, HD03239</td></tr><tr><td>Business Sector</td><td>Energy costs, digital infra</td><td>Mixed positive</td><td>HD03236, HD03244</td></tr><tr><td>Local Government</td><td>Service withdrawals, ports</td><td>Concerned</td><td>HD11718, TU19</td></tr><tr><td>Legal Professionals</td><td>Civil servant liability</td><td>Watching</td><td>HD03217</td></tr><tr><td>Defence/Security</td><td>NATO costs</td><td>Supportive</td><td>HD03220</td></tr><tr><td>Academic/Think-tanks</td><td>Constitutional changes</td><td>Monitoring</td><td>HD01KU32/33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>📋 Template reference:</strong> <code>analysis/templates/threat-analysis.md</code> v3.3 (2026-06-01). Political Threat Taxonomy · Attack Tree · Kill Chain · Diamond Model — <strong>NOT</strong> STRIDE.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-analysis-context">📋 Threat Analysis Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-analysis-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-analysis-context">📋 Threat Analysis Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1933,11 +1933,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-analysis-context">📋 Threat Analysis Context<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat Analysis ID</strong></td><td><code>THR-2026-04-19-001</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19 16:00 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>Monthly review — 2026-03-20 to 2026-04-19 (Riksmöte 2025/26, spring sprint)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td><code>news-monthly-review</code> workflow (Tier-C, 1.5× multiplier)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Political Context</strong></td><td>Sweden is 147 days from the 2026-09-13 general election. The Tidö-constellation coalition (M+KD+L + SD parliamentary support) has accelerated its legislative delivery with 4 budget propositions, a crime-reform trilogy (HD03218 / HD03246 / HD03217), and two <em>vilande</em> grundlag changes (HD01KU32 / HD01KU33). Opposition (S/V/C/MP) activity has intensified (41 interpellations in 30 days — highest rate of the session).</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td><strong>MODERATE</strong> (trending HIGH on accountability + power-balance axes, LOW on narrative-integrity axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Severity Scale:</strong> 1=Negligible · 2=Minor · 3=Moderate · 4=Major · 5=Severe. All 6 Political Threat Taxonomy categories assessed below — STRIDE categories are <strong>not</strong> used for political threat analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-political-threat-landscape">Political Threat Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-landscape"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-political-threat-landscape">Political Threat Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-landscape"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "🏷️ Political Threat Taxonomy"
         NI["🎭 Narrative Integrity&#x3C;br/>Disinformation &#x26; False Framing"]
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-political-threat-landscape">Political Threat Landscape<a class="" ari
     class AC1,PB1 major
     class DP1,LI1 moderate
     class NI1,TR1 minor</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered">Threat Severity Table (all 6 categories covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered">Threat Severity Table (all 6 categories covered)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-severity-table-all-6-categories-covered">Threat Severity Table
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Taxonomy Category</th><th>Threat (1-sentence)</th><th align="center">Sev</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>NI-01</td><td><strong>Narrative Integrity</strong></td><td>Electoral framing of fuel-tax cut (HD03236) as "household relief" elides structural unemployment 8.7% and fiscal cost</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD03236, HD03100, HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>LI-01</td><td><strong>Legislative Integrity</strong></td><td>Expanded civil-servant criminal liability HD03217 + double-penalty HD03218 combination creates punitive legislative stack without parallel appeal-mechanism expansion</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD03217, HD03218, HD03246</td></tr><tr><td>AC-01</td><td><strong>Accountability</strong></td><td>KU33 narrowing of "formellt tillförd bevisning" + press-freedom scope (TF 2:1) limits investigative journalism access to evidence in searches — <em>vilande</em> pending second-reading post-election</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td>TR-01</td><td><strong>Transparency</strong></td><td>Baseline g0v.se department attribution gap (266/268 monthly documents return <em>"unknown"</em>) persists — documented limitation, not new risk; risk is entrenchment</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code>, HD03244</td></tr><tr><td>DP-01</td><td><strong>Democratic Process</strong></td><td>KU32 + KU33 <em>vilande</em> design turns Sep 2026 election into de-facto constitutional referendum; post-election Riksdag composition gates whether the grundlag changes confirm or lapse</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td>PB-01</td><td><strong>Power Balance</strong></td><td>Pre-election legislative concentration: 4 budgets (HD03100/HD0399/HD03236/HD03241) + 3 crime bills + 4 environmental deregulation bills in 30 days concentrated in executive-coalition arithmetic with SD as kingmaker</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td><td>HD03218, HD03239, HD03242, HD03236</td></tr><tr><td>PB-02</td><td><strong>Power Balance</strong></td><td>Swedish contribution to NATO eFP in Finland (HD03220) transfers operational discretion to ÖB / NATO SACEUR — broad cross-party support but reduces parliamentary operational oversight</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td><td>HD03220, HD03231</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net coverage</strong>: All 6 Political Threat Taxonomy categories covered with ≥ 1 threat each; 2 threats rated <strong>Major (4)</strong>, 3 rated <strong>Moderate (3)</strong>, 2 rated <strong>Minor (2)</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat (AC-01: KU33 press-freedom narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat (AC-01: KU33 press-freedom narrowing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: Entrench narrow interpretation of&#x3C;br/>'formellt tillförd bevisning' in TF 2:1&#x3C;br/>post-2026-09-13 election"]
     ROOT --> A1["Path A: Second-reading pass&#x3C;br/>in same-composition Riksdag"]
@@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-ac-01-ku33-press-freedom-narrowing
     style A3a fill:#ffc107,color:#000</pre>
 <p><strong>Attack-tree reading</strong>: The top threat (AC-01) succeeds if <strong>any one of three paths</strong> completes. Disrupting the threat requires mitigation on <strong>all three</strong> paths simultaneously — electorally (Path A), institutionally (Path B via Lagrådet engagement), and civil-society (Path C via co-ordinated remissvar). See <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Monitoring Triggers for the timeline. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01">⛓️ Section 3: Kill Chain Assessment (Top Threat AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01">⛓️ Section 3: Kill Chain Assessment (Top Threat AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2119,7 +2119,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-section-3-kill-chain-assessment-top-threat-ac-01">⛓️ Section
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Definition</th><th>Current State (2026-04-19)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></td><td>Identify constitutional opportunity</td><td>✅ Complete — KU33 drafted, coalition consensus reached</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaponisation</strong></td><td>Draft legal text</td><td>✅ Complete — proposition framed; <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em> clause embedded</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Delivery</strong></td><td>Introduce in chamber</td><td>✅ Complete — first reading tabled, <em>vilande</em> vote taken</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Exploitation</strong></td><td>Second-reading confirmation</td><td>🟡 Pending — blocked until post-2026-09-13 Riksdag</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Installation</strong></td><td>Grundlag-level entrenchment</td><td>⛔ Not yet — requires second-reading pass in new Riksdag</td><td align="center"><code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C2 / Persistence</strong></td><td>Case-law precedent via early prosecutions</td><td>⛔ Not yet — depends on installation</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Action on Objectives</strong></td><td>Systematic narrowing of investigative-journalism access</td><td>⛔ Not yet — downstream of installation</td><td align="center"><code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Kill-chain reading</strong>: The threat has progressed through <strong>Delivery</strong> and is held at <strong>Exploitation</strong>. The <strong>decisive disruption window</strong> is <strong>pre-second-reading</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande (Q2 2026) + election campaign (summer 2026) + new Riksdag composition (2026-09-24). <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — Primary Threat Actor (PB-01 · Tidö coalition legislative concentration)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — Primary Threat Actor (PB-01 · Tidö coalition legislative concentration)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition-legislative-concentration"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A["👤 ADVERSARY&#x3C;br/>Tidö coalition legislative machinery&#x3C;br/>M+KD+L + SD parliamentary support"]
     I["🏗️ INFRASTRUCTURE&#x3C;br/>- Regeringskansliet legislative pipeline&#x3C;br/>- Coalition-discipline voting record (0 SD-defections)&#x3C;br/>- Budget-proposition scheduling authority"]
@@ -2137,7 +2137,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--primary-threat-actor-pb-01--tidö-coalition
     style V fill:#ffc107,color:#000</pre>
 <p><strong>Diamond reading</strong>: The adversary is <strong>not a malicious actor</strong> — it is the <strong>legitimate exercise of parliamentary majority under coalition discipline</strong>. The threat is not to democracy itself but to <strong>deliberative depth</strong>: capability × infrastructure produces legislative velocity that may outpace victim-side (opposition + Lagrådet + civil society) review bandwidth. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor Profile — ICO (Intent-Capability-Opportunity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor Profile — ICO (Intent-Capability-Opportunity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2188,36 +2188,36 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-profile--ico-intent-capability-opportunity">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Intent</th><th align="center">Capability</th><th align="center">Opportunity</th><th align="center">Composite</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Tidö coalition (M+KD+L)</strong></td><td align="center">8/10 — explicit pre-election delivery agenda</td><td align="center">9/10 — operational legislative pipeline</td><td align="center">9/10 — parliamentary majority, 147 days to election</td><td align="center"><strong>8.7/10 HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (kingmaker)</strong></td><td align="center">7/10 — crime-package and migration ownership</td><td align="center">6/10 — no ministerial portfolios</td><td align="center">8/10 — confidence-and-supply leverage</td><td align="center"><strong>7.0/10 MODERATE</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>S-led opposition bloc</strong></td><td align="center">9/10 — election-campaign positioning</td><td align="center">5/10 — no majority leverage</td><td align="center">6/10 — 41 interpellations / 30 days</td><td align="center"><strong>6.7/10 MODERATE</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V + MP (grundlag-protection advocates)</strong></td><td align="center">9/10 — KU32/KU33 opposition</td><td align="center">4/10 — small parliamentary footprint</td><td align="center">5/10 — may build ECHR challenge H2 2026</td><td align="center"><strong>6.0/10 MODERATE</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>External — Russia (hybrid-threat vector)</strong></td><td align="center">8/10 — documented interest in Nordic destabilisation</td><td align="center">7/10 — MSB/SÄPO-assessed capability</td><td align="center">7/10 — eFP Finland + Ukraine tribunal create friction</td><td align="center"><strong>7.3/10 HIGH</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><code>[HIGH]</code> for domestic actor scores; <code>[MEDIUM]</code> for external actor (dependent on SÄPO/MSB threat bulletins — see <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> for source gap).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register">🚨 Section 6: Identified Threats — Consolidated Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01">TH-01 · Pre-election Legislative Concentration (PB-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register">🚨 Section 6: Identified Threats — Consolidated Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6-identified-threats--consolidated-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01">TH-01 · Pre-election Legislative Concentration (PB-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-01--pre-election-legislative-concentration-pb-01"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Power Balance · <strong>Severity</strong>: 4 / Major · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241, HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03242, HD03239</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: 4 budgets + crime trilogy + environmental deregulation cluster delivered in 30 days represents the legislative apex of the spring session. Velocity is legitimate but compresses Lagrådet review windows and opposition-motion preparation cycles. V + MP + S collectively filed 19 counter-motions but could not reach the 175-MP threshold for procedural blocking.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Lagrådet should receive full allocated review time on all grundlag-adjacent items; opposition should front-load second-reading challenges in new Riksdag.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01">TH-02 · KU33 Press-Freedom Narrowing — <em>vilande</em> (AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01">TH-02 · KU33 Press-Freedom Narrowing — <em>vilande</em> (AC-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-02--ku33-press-freedom-narrowing--vilande-ac-01"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Accountability · <strong>Severity</strong>: 4 / Major · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD01KU33, HD01KU32</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: Narrow interpretation of <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em> in TF 2:1 — if confirmed in second reading — sets case-law precedent durable for ≥ 8 years. The <em>vilande</em> design effectively turns Sep-2026 into a constitutional referendum. See §2 Attack Tree and §3 Kill Chain above.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: TU + Pressens Opinionsnämnd + Journalistförbundet co-ordinated remissvar; Lagrådet engagement; post-election statutory-clarity amendments.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02">TH-03 · Hybrid-Threat Exposure Post-eFP Deployment (PB-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02">TH-03 · Hybrid-Threat Exposure Post-eFP Deployment (PB-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-03--hybrid-threat-exposure-post-efp-deployment-pb-02"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Power Balance (external) · <strong>Severity</strong>: 3 / Moderate · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[MEDIUM]</code> (SÄPO/MSB source gap — not in monthly MCP sync)</li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03220, HD03231</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: Battalion-task-group deployment to Finland Q3 2026 + leadership on Ukraine Aggression Tribunal (HD03231) elevate Sweden's public profile. External hybrid-threat actors (Russia per documented posture) may respond with information-ops, cyber probing, or physical-infrastructure harassment — leading indicators track through SÄPO/MSB bulletins, not parliamentary documents.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Nordic-Baltic intel-sharing; civil-society resilience; MSB heightened public-info posture through deployment window.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01">TH-04 · Civil-Servant Chilling Effect (LI-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01">TH-04 · Civil-Servant Chilling Effect (LI-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-04--civil-servant-chilling-effect-li-01"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Legislative Integrity · <strong>Severity</strong>: 3 / Moderate · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03217, HD03218, HD03246</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis</strong>: Extended criminal liability for civil servants (HD03217) paired with a general punitive legislative turn (HD03218/HD03246) risks risk-aversion in agency decision-making — a measurable effect visible in FOI-response latencies and internal-memo culture. V + MP raised rule-of-law objections in committee.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Parallel expansion of administrative appeal mechanisms; JK (Justitiekanslern) monitoring.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative">TH-05 · Environmental-Governance Compliance Friction (LI-02 derivative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative">TH-05 · Environmental-Governance Compliance Friction (LI-02 derivative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Legislative Integrity · <strong>Severity</strong>: 3 / Moderate · <strong>Confidence</strong>: <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Evidence (dok_id)</strong>: HD03242, HD03239, HD03238, HD03240</li>
@@ -2225,7 +2225,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-th-05--environmental-governance-compliance-friction-li-02-derivative"
 <li><strong>Mitigation stance</strong>: Pre-notification to DG ENV; species-inventory compromise per Finland 2023 precedent; staggered transition timing.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7-severity-distribution">📊 Section 7: Severity Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7-severity-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7-severity-distribution">📊 Section 7: Severity Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7-severity-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Threat Distribution by Severity (Political Threat Taxonomy)
     "Severe (5)" : 0
     "Major (4)" : 2
@@ -2234,7 +2234,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7-severity-distribution">📊 Section 7: Severity Distributi
     "Negligible (1)" : 0</pre>
 <p><strong>Net assessment</strong>: <strong>No Severe (5) threats</strong> — parliamentary guardrails, Lagrådet review, opposition activity and MCP-observable data flows all function. <strong>Two Major (4) threats</strong> require priority mitigation: legislative concentration (PB-01) and KU33 press-freedom narrowing (AC-01). Overall monthly threat level: <strong>MODERATE</strong>, trending HIGH on accountability + power-balance axes in Q3 2026 post-election window. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals">🔭 Section 8: Forward Indicators — MCP-Detectable Escalation Signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals">🔭 Section 8: Forward Indicators — MCP-Detectable Escalation Signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-indicators--mcp-detectable-escalation-signals">
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Data Source</th><th>Trigger Threshold</th><th align="center">Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-01</td><td>Lagrådet issues critical yttrande on KU32 or KU33</td><td><code>get_propositioner</code> + Lagrådet web feed</td><td>Keywords "oförenligt", "avstyrka"</td><td align="center">30 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-02</td><td>SD defects on any coalition bill (first defection of session)</td><td><code>search_voteringar</code> with <code>parti=SD</code> + <code>rost≠Ja</code></td><td>≥ 1 SD "Nej" on government bill</td><td align="center">45 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-03</td><td>EU Commission issues formal notice on HD03242 / HD03239</td><td>EU Commission press releases (outside MCP)</td><td>Infringement reference number</td><td align="center">60 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-04</td><td>Parliamentary procedural blocking attempt (1/3 rule)</td><td><code>search_dokument?typ=yrkande</code></td><td>≥ 110 MPs co-sign</td><td align="center">30 days</td></tr><tr><td>FI-05</td><td>SÄPO/MSB public threat-level change (hybrid)</td><td>Outside MCP — manual tracking</td><td>Level raise to "elevated"</td><td align="center">90 days (eFP window)</td></tr><tr><td>FI-06</td><td>TU / Journalistförbundet formal remissvar filed on KU33</td><td>g0v.se remiss registry</td><td>Non-null response-id</td><td align="center">45 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Cross-reference: <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> §Monitoring-Trigger Calendar, <code>executive-brief.md</code> §90-Day Forward Vote Calendar.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-9-upstream-reconciliation">🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-9-upstream-reconciliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-9-upstream-reconciliation">🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-9-upstream-reconciliation"></a></h3>
 <p>Threats carried forward from sibling runs in the 30-day lookback window:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/threat-analysis.md</code> → TH-01 PB-01 <strong>escalated 3→4</strong> (legislative concentration intensified)</li>
@@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-9-upstream-reconciliation">🔁 Section 9: Upstream Reconcil
 </ul>
 <p>Full reconciliation: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a> §Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2338,7 +2338,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>File-ID</strong></td><td>CMP-2026-M04</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td><code>monthly-review</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jurisdictions Benchmarked</strong></td><td>🇸🇪 Sweden · 🇩🇰 Denmark · 🇳🇴 Norway · 🇫🇮 Finland · 🇩🇪 Germany · 🇳🇱 Netherlands · 🇪🇺 EU institutions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Sources</strong></td><td>World Bank · OECD · Eurostat · Reporters Without Borders (RSF) · Council of Europe · EU Commission DG ENV / DG JUST</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Reference</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/month-ahead/comparative-international.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard">Cluster Overview: Sweden's April 2026 Innovates / Follows / Diverges Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard">Cluster Overview: Sweden's April 2026 Innovates / Follows / Diverges Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2437,7 +2437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-overview-swedens-april-2026-innovates--follows--diverges-scor
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Policy Cluster</th><th>Flagship Docs</th><th align="center">SE Innovates</th><th align="center">SE Follows</th><th align="center">SE Diverges</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal stimulus + fuel-tax cut</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DK 2023, DE 2022)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Criminal-networks double penalty</td><td>HD03218</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DK 2018 gang zones)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Youth-offender tightening</td><td>HD03246</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (NL, DK)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Civil-servant criminal liability</td><td>HD03217</td><td align="center">✅ (among strongest in EU)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Press-freedom / TF narrowing (KU33)</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">⚠️ (EU average tightens)</td></tr><tr><td>Accessibility-oriented TF change (KU32)</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Active forestry + wind municipal veto</td><td>HD03242, HD03239</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">❌ (EU Biodiversity 2030)</td></tr><tr><td>New permit authority</td><td>HD03238</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DE UBA, FI Tukes/SYKE)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine Crime-of-Aggression Tribunal</td><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">✅ (founding member)</td><td align="center">✅ (EU position)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>International Compensation Commission</td><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP operational contribution</td><td>HD03220</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✅ (DE/UK/CA Baltic models)</td><td align="center"></td></tr><tr><td>EU Wage-Transparency transposition pace</td><td>HD10437</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">⚠️ (DK Q1, DE Q2, SE lagging)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline">1. Nordic Economic Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline">1. Nordic Economic Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Nordic GDP Growth Comparison 2024 (%)"
     x-axis ["Sweden", "Denmark", "Norway", "Finland"]
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-nordic-economic-baseline">1. Nordic Economic Baseline<a class="" ar
 <li>Inflation has <strong>re-converged</strong> with Nordic peers (2.84 % vs. 2.1–3.2 % band) — the 2023 crisis peak of 8.55 % is resolved. Reduces Riksbank-policy noise from the election.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster">2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster">2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03218</code> mandatory double-penalty enhancement for crimes with gang-network connection; <code>HD03246</code> stricter youth-offender rules; <code>HD03217</code> extended criminal liability for civil servants acting outside authority.</p>
 
 
@@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-criminal-justice-reform-cluster">2. Criminal-Justice Reform Cluster
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Instrument</th><th align="center">Entered Force</th><th>Comparability to HD03218</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>Gang-zone law (<em>visitationszoner</em> + penalty-doubling)</td><td align="center">2018, expanded 2023</td><td><strong>Closest precedent</strong> — zone-based penalty doubling; SE's HD03218 adopts network-based trigger instead (broader)</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td><em>Ondermijningswet</em> (organised-crime financial-tracing)</td><td align="center">2022</td><td>Parallel toolkit; SE lacks equivalent financial-tracing provisions</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>§ 129a / § 129b StGB (terror/organised-crime)</td><td align="center">Long-standing</td><td>Different trigger (membership) but similar enhancement logic</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>Penalty-enhancement <em>straffeloven</em> § 79 (c)</td><td align="center">2021</td><td>Similar conceptually; narrower in scope</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>RL 6:5 aggravation (organised-crime element)</td><td align="center">Stable</td><td>Most restrained Nordic approach</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> the DK gang-zone precedent but with a <strong>broader network-based trigger</strong>. SE's <code>HD03217</code> civil-servant liability is <strong>AMONG THE STRONGEST IN EU</strong> (only NO has a comparably broad inner-authority liability rule). ECHR-litigation risk: see <code>risk-assessment.md</code> R-04.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande">3. Constitutional Press-Freedom Cluster (KU32 + KU33 <em>vilande</em>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande">3. Constitutional Press-Freedom Cluster (KU32 + KU33 <em>vilande</em>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD01KU32</code> media-accessibility grundlag change; <code>HD01KU33</code> search-and-seizure of digital evidence narrowing "allmän handling" scope.</p>
 
 
@@ -2624,7 +2624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-press-freedom-cluster-ku32--ku33-vilande">3. Constit
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Baseline Press-Freedom Framework</th><th align="center">2024–2026 Direction</th><th align="center">RSF 2025 Index</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden</td><td><em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (1766) — world's oldest</td><td align="center">⬇ Narrowing (KU33)</td><td align="center">4</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td><em>Grunnloven</em> § 100; <em>Offentleglova</em></td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td><em>Grundloven</em> § 77; <em>Offentlighedsloven</em> 2014</td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">3</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td><em>Perustuslaki</em> § 12; <em>Julkisuuslaki</em> 1999</td><td align="center">↑ Slight strengthening</td><td align="center">5</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>Art. 5 Grundgesetz</td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">10</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>Art. 7 Grondwet</td><td align="center">↔ Stable</td><td align="center">6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>DIVERGES</strong> from Nordic peers. Every other Nordic country is stable or strengthening press-freedom baselines; Sweden narrows via KU33. <strong>Norway's statutory-trigger model</strong> (<em>Offentleglova</em> enumerated exceptions with written-reason requirement) is the most credible cross-bloc compromise path for the KU33 second-reading debate — <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> H-B monitors this.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction">4. Environmental Deregulation Cluster &#x26; EU Friction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction">4. Environmental Deregulation Cluster &#x26; EU Friction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03238</code> new environmental permit authority · <code>HD03242</code> active forestry · <code>HD03239</code> wind-power municipal veto · <code>HD03240</code> new electricity-system law.</p>
 
 
@@ -2669,9 +2669,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-environmental-deregulation-cluster--eu-friction">4. Environmental D
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>EU Instrument</th><th>Sweden Compliance Risk</th><th>Comparable Precedent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 (30 % protected)</td><td>🔴 HIGH — HD03242 active-forestry narrows species protection</td><td>🇫🇮 FI faced 2023 Natura-2000 peatland scrutiny → species-inventory compromise</td></tr><tr><td>EU Taxonomy Regulation (sustainable-finance TEG)</td><td>🟠 MEDIUM — forestry company financing classification at risk</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>EU Forest Strategy for 2030</td><td>🟠 MEDIUM — binding elements under revision</td><td>🇩🇪 DE holding-pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Renewable Energy Directive III</td><td>🟡 LOW — HD03239 wind-veto adds local-opt-out but meets target pathway</td><td>🇳🇱 NL has comparable local-veto mechanisms</td></tr><tr><td>Water Framework Directive</td><td>🟢 None — unchanged</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC</td><td>🟠 MEDIUM — active-forestry interaction with Article 6(3)</td><td>🇫🇮 FI precedent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>DIVERGES</strong> from EU trajectory on biodiversity. Finland's 2023 Natura-2000 species-inventory compromise is the credible de-escalation path — see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> H-A 90-day trajectory and <code>risk-assessment.md</code> R-02.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster">5. Geopolitical / NATO Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster">5. Geopolitical / NATO Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-geopolitical--nato-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03220</code> 1,200 troops to Finland under enhanced Forward Presence (first post-accession operational contribution); <code>HD03231</code> + <code>HD03232</code> Ukraine tribunal + reparations commission.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark">NATO operational integration benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark">NATO operational integration benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2715,7 +2715,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-nato-operational-integration-benchmark">NATO operational integration
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Framework Nation</th><th align="center">Battalion in Baltics since</th><th>Lead Nation For</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Estonia eFP</td><td>Original eFP architect</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Lithuania eFP</td><td>Brigade upgrade 2024</td></tr><tr><td>🇨🇦 Canada</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Latvia eFP</td><td>Recently reinforced</td></tr><tr><td>🇺🇸 US</td><td align="center">2017</td><td>Poland (framework)</td><td>Continuous rotational</td></tr><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>2026 (new)</strong></td><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td><strong>First Swedish operational output post-accession</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: Sweden <strong>FOLLOWS</strong> the UK/DE/CA eFP model — contributing a framework-nation-style presence to Finland. No lead-nation role yet; expected 2027+ review cycle.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship">International-justice norm entrepreneurship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship">International-justice norm entrepreneurship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2759,9 +2759,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-international-justice-norm-entrepreneurship">International-justice no
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Instrument</th><th align="center">SE Position</th><th align="center">EU Position</th><th align="center">US Position</th><th align="center">Russia Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Council of Europe Crime-of-Aggression Tribunal (HD03231)</td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">Supportive</td><td align="center">Ambiguous (post-admin shift)</td><td align="center">Hostile</td></tr><tr><td>International Compensation Commission (HD03232)</td><td align="center">Founding member</td><td align="center">Supportive (EUR 260 B Euroclear asset frozen)</td><td align="center">Fluctuating</td><td align="center">Hostile</td></tr><tr><td>ICC Rome Statute</td><td align="center">Party</td><td align="center">Parties</td><td align="center">Not party</td><td align="center">Withdrew</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR</td><td align="center">Party</td><td align="center">Parties</td><td align="center">n/a</td><td align="center">Expelled 2022</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>INNOVATES</strong> — Sweden is a <strong>founding member</strong> of the first Crime-of-Aggression tribunal since Nuremberg. This is a decadal norm-entrepreneurship play (see <code>swot-analysis.md</code> §Opportunity O-1 and <code>executive-brief.md</code> §Top-5 Opportunities).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-gender--equality-cluster">6. Gender / Equality Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-gender--equality-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-gender--equality-cluster">6. Gender / Equality Cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-gender--equality-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden</strong>: <code>HD03245</code> national strategy against men's violence; <code>HD10437</code> EU Wage Transparency Directive interpellation; <code>HD10438</code> women's-shelter-closure interpellation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07">EU Wage Transparency Directive 2023/970 transposition race (deadline <strong>2026-06-07</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07">EU Wage Transparency Directive 2023/970 transposition race (deadline <strong>2026-06-07</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-2026-06-07"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2800,7 +2800,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-wage-transparency-directive-2023970-transposition-race-deadline-20
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Status April 2026</th><th align="center">Expected Completion</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>✅ <strong>Transposed</strong> Q1 2026</td><td align="center">Done</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>🟡 Draft in Bundestag (Gesetzentwurf)</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>🟡 Draft in Tweede Kamer</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>🟡 HE prepared</td><td align="center">Q2 2026</td></tr><tr><td>🇸🇪 <strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>🔴 <strong>Remissförfarande open</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Q3 2026 risk</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>SE posture</strong>: <strong>DIVERGES</strong> — Sweden risks being among the <strong>last</strong> EU-27 to transpose despite a strong gender-equality reputation. <code>HD10437</code> interpellation makes this a campaign issue. <strong>Electoral implication</strong>: opposition attack vector paired with <code>HD10438</code> shelter crisis.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house">7. Democratic-Resilience Benchmark (V-Dem + RSF + Freedom House)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house">7. Democratic-Resilience Benchmark (V-Dem + RSF + Freedom House)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2849,7 +2849,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-democratic-resilience-benchmark-v-dem--rsf--freedom-house">7. Democ
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">🇸🇪 SE 2025</th><th align="center">🇳🇴 NO 2025</th><th align="center">🇩🇰 DK 2025</th><th align="center">🇫🇮 FI 2025</th><th align="center">Δ vs 2020</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>V-Dem Liberal Democracy Index</td><td align="center">0.88</td><td align="center">0.90</td><td align="center">0.89</td><td align="center">0.88</td><td align="center">SE: -0.02</td></tr><tr><td>RSF Press Freedom Index (rank)</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">SE: ↓ 3</td></tr><tr><td>Freedom House (score /100)</td><td align="center">100</td><td align="center">100</td><td align="center">97</td><td align="center">100</td><td align="center">SE: ± 0</td></tr><tr><td>Corruption Perceptions (TI)</td><td align="center">82</td><td align="center">84</td><td align="center">88</td><td align="center">87</td><td align="center">SE: -3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: Sweden has experienced a <strong>mild liberal-democracy erosion</strong> (V-Dem -0.02, RSF -3 rank) since 2020, driven in part by TF narrowing and institutional-trust trends. <strong>Still highest-tier globally</strong> but <strong>no longer the Nordic leader</strong> on press freedom.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026">Summary — Sweden's International Positioning in April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026">Summary — Sweden's International Positioning in April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2908,18 +2908,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary--swedens-international-positioning-in-april-2026">Summary —
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Posture</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal policy</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS (cautious Nordic mainstream)</td><td>No reputational friction</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal justice</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS (DK gang-zone precedent + broader network trigger)</td><td>Aligned with Nordic-tough trend</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-servant liability</td><td align="center">🟢 INNOVATES</td><td>Positive ISMS signal; minor ECHR risk</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional press freedom (KU33)</td><td align="center">🔴 DIVERGES</td><td><strong>Reputational-risk vector</strong> — RSF impact likely</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental deregulation</td><td align="center">🔴 DIVERGES from EU Biodiversity 2030</td><td><strong>Infringement-proceeding risk</strong></td></tr><tr><td>EU Wage-Transparency transposition</td><td align="center">🟠 LAGS</td><td>Campaign attack-vector</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine international-justice accession</td><td align="center">🟢 INNOVATES (founding member)</td><td>Decadal norm-entrepreneurship dividend</td></tr><tr><td>NATO eFP Finland contribution</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS (UK/DE/CA framework model)</td><td>Operational credibility; no lead-nation role yet</td></tr><tr><td>Gender-equality strategy</td><td align="center">🟡 FOLLOWS Nordic baseline; shelter-crisis drag</td><td>Policy/rhetoric mismatch is visible</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net cluster verdict</strong>: Sweden in April 2026 is a <strong>norm entrepreneur abroad</strong> (Ukraine tribunal, reparations commission) while <strong>normatively diverging domestically</strong> on press freedom and environmental compliance. This tension is the April 2026 <strong>international-reputation fulcrum</strong> — see <code>swot-analysis.md</code> §Opportunities and <code>threat-analysis.md</code> §TH-04.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1">Cross-Reference to Upstream<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Nordic baseline table <strong>aligned</strong> to <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/comparative-international.md</code></a> with the monthly-scope extension to include DE, NL, and EU institutions as required by <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> Tier-C contract (≥ 5 jurisdictions).</li>
 <li>Wage-transparency benchmarking <strong>updated</strong> to reflect DK completion (Q1 2026) from last weekly-review snapshot.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next review</strong>: 2026-05-19 (monthly cadence) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 · <code>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §"WORLD BANK ECONOMIC CONTEXT INTEGRATION"</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package">🔒 ISMS CIA-Triad Classification (Riksdagsmonitor Package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package">🔒 ISMS CIA-Triad Classification (Riksdagsmonitor Package)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Scope</strong>: This classification governs the <strong>monthly-review intelligence package itself</strong> — the 14 analysis artefacts, the article, and their handling. It is <strong>not</strong> a classification of Swedish government documents (which are classified per <em>Offentlighets- och sekretesslagen</em> by the respective authorities).</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2953,7 +2953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--isms-cia-triad-classification-riksdagsmonitor-package">🔒 ISMS CIA
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Rating</th><th>Justification</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Confidentiality</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 <strong>Public</strong></td><td>All inputs are <em>allmänna handlingar</em> (public documents from <code>data.riksdagen.se</code> + <code>regeringen.se</code>) + open data (World Bank, SCB, g0v.se). No personal data beyond named public officials acting in political capacity.</td><td><code>data-download-manifest.md</code> §Source Registry</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Integrity</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 <strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Analysis informs political-accountability reporting and editorial decisions; factual errors (vote-count, dok_id, minister attribution) would propagate to 14 translated articles and cause reputational + informational harm.</td><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Uncertainty Hot-Spots</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Availability</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Articles are published daily; a 24-hour outage degrades but does not destroy journalistic value (retrospectives remain retrievable). No real-time operational dependency.</td><td>GitHub Pages SLA + dual-deploy (GH Pages + S3)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-compliance-framework-mapping">Compliance Framework Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-framework-mapping"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compliance-framework-mapping">Compliance Framework Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-framework-mapping"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2995,7 +2995,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-compliance-framework-mapping">Compliance Framework Mapping<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Framework</th><th>Applicable Controls</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>GDPR (EU 2016/679)</strong></td><td>Art. 6(1)(e) public interest · Art. 6(1)(f) legitimate interest · Art. 85 journalism derogation — covers processing of named politicians in political capacity</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU AI Act (2024/1689)</strong></td><td>Art. 50 AI-transparency disclosure — article carries AI-authored-with-human-review disclosure; news-journalist agent documented in <code>.github/agents/</code></td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ISO 27001:2022</strong></td><td>A.5.10 information classification · A.5.12 labelling · A.5.14 information transfer · A.8.11 data masking (not applicable — public only)</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>NIST CSF 2.0</strong></td><td>ID.AM-5 data classified · ID.RA risk assessed (see <code>risk-assessment.md</code>) · PR.DS-2 in-transit protection (HTTPS)</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>CIS Controls v8.1</strong></td><td>CIS 3.1 data-management process · CIS 3.2 data-inventory (dok_id manifest) · CIS 14.9 documentation of data processing</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdagsmonitor ISMS policies</strong></td><td><code>AI_Policy.md</code>, <code>Secure_Development_Policy.md</code>, <code>CLASSIFICATION.md</code>, <code>Information_Security_Policy.md</code> (Hack23 ISMS-PUBLIC)</td><td>✅ Covered</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-retention--handling">Retention &#x26; Handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--handling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-retention--handling">Retention &#x26; Handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--handling"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retention</strong>: Permanent public archive in git history + GitHub Pages. <code>documents/</code> raw JSON retained indefinitely for provenance audit.</li>
 <li><strong>Sharing</strong>: No restrictions. All artefacts suitable for external distribution, syndication, and academic citation.</li>
@@ -3003,7 +3003,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-retention--handling">Retention &#x26; Handling<a class="" aria-hidden
 <li><strong>AI governance</strong>: Article header declares AI-authored-with-human-review per EU AI Act Art. 50. Prompt-injection defences per <code>.github/skills/ai-governance/</code>.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain">Document Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain">Document Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Policy Domain Distribution (April 2026)
     "Justice &#x26; Crime" : 18
     "Fiscal &#x26; Economy" : 15
@@ -3016,7 +3016,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-policy-domain">Document Classification by
     "Constitutional" : 4
     "Other" : 14</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3184,37 +3184,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (EN)</th><th>Domain</th><th>Type</th><th>Significance</th><th>Electoral Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Double penalties for criminal networks</td><td>Justice</td><td>Proposition</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Spring Economic Proposition 2026</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Proposition</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra budget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Proposition</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>NATO Finland contribution</td><td>Defence</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>New environmental permit agency</td><td>Environment</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>National strategy against men's violence</td><td>Social</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Stricter youth offender rules</td><td>Justice</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Extended civil servant criminal liability</td><td>Justice</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Active forestry regulation</td><td>Environment</td><td>Proposition</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Data interoperability public sector</td><td>Digital</td><td>Proposition</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power in municipalities</td><td>Energy</td><td>Proposition</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>New electricity system law</td><td>Energy</td><td>Proposition</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>National condominium register</td><td>Housing</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property ID requirements</td><td>Housing</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Media accessibility (vilande)</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Digital records in searches (vilande)</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Committee</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>Women's shelter closures</td><td>Social</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>Wage transparency directive</td><td>Labour</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion — oppose fuel tax cut</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Motion</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 1: Pre-Election Crime Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 1: Pre-Election Crime Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-pre-election-crime-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03237</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: SD-driven agenda delivered through coalition legislation</li>
 <li>Opposition stance: S/V abstain or oppose, C partially supportive</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 2: Spring Budget Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience">Cluster 2: Spring Budget Package (Very High Electoral Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-spring-budget-package-very-high-electoral-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03241, HD03243</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: Responsible budget + household relief</li>
 <li>Opposition stance: MP opposes fuel cuts; S demands structural investment</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance">Cluster 3: Environmental Reform Cluster (High EU/International Relevance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance">Cluster 3: Environmental Reform Cluster (High EU/International Relevance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-environmental-reform-cluster-high-euinternational-relevance"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD03238, HD03239, HD03240, HD03242, MJU19</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: Streamlined regulation for green economy growth</li>
 <li>Opposition stance: V/MP strongly oppose deregulation; C mixed</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention">Cluster 4: Social Protection Gap (High Public Attention)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention">Cluster 4: Social Protection Gap (High Public Attention)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-protection-gap-high-public-attention"></a></h4>
 <p>Documents: HD10438, HD10437, HD03245, HD11719</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative: Gap between legislative intent and implementation funding</li>
 <li>Opportunity for S to campaign on welfare state restoration</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Article Type</strong>: monthly-review</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     BUDGET["📊 SPRING BUDGET PACKAGE"]
     HD03100["HD03100\nSpring Economic Proposition"]
@@ -3268,7 +3268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" a
     HD03238 -.->|"Interacts with"| HD03239
     HD03238 -.->|"Interacts with"| HD03242</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3336,7 +3336,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Primary dok_id</th><th>Related dok_id</th><th>Relationship</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Supplementary budget to spring prop</td><td>Critical fiscal linkage</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Crime bill needs police capacity</td><td>Implementation dependency</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>HD10438</td><td>Strategy vs. on-the-ground reality</td><td>Policy credibility gap</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Same agency will handle wind power</td><td>Institutional overlap</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Permit agency + forestry = deregulation agenda</td><td>Thematic cluster</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>HD0399</td><td>NATO costs financed through spring budget</td><td>Budget dependency</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Both constitutional changes — same vilande cycle</td><td>Process linkage</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Wage gap + violence — gender equality cluster</td><td>Thematic</td></tr><tr><td>HD11719</td><td>HD10438</td><td>Both reveal state protection failures for women</td><td>Social cohesion signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-article-type-connections">Sibling Article Type Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-article-type-connections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-article-type-connections">Sibling Article Type Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-article-type-connections"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3364,7 +3364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-article-type-connections">Sibling Article Type Connections<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>This Article</th><th>Sibling Type</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Monthly review (2026-04-19)</td><td>Week-ahead (2026-04-14)</td><td>Month-end review captures week-ahead items that concluded</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly review (2026-04-19)</td><td>Propositions (2026-04-14)</td><td>Validates proposition-level analysis with monthly synthesis</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly review (2026-04-19)</td><td>Monthly review (2026-03-19)</td><td>Prior month comparative baseline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies">Legislative Pipeline Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies">Legislative Pipeline Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     A[Spring Prop HD03100] -->|Frames| B[Autumn Budget Sept 2026]
     B -->|Influences| C[Post-election government programme]
@@ -3373,7 +3373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-pipeline-dependencies">Legislative Pipeline Dependencies<
     F[Environmental reforms] -->|Subject to| G[EU compliance review Q3 2026]
     H[Constitutional changes KU32/33] -->|Require| I[Post-election parliament confirmation]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3409,7 +3409,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>File-ID</strong></td><td>MET-2026-M04</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-19</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Article Type</strong></td><td><code>monthly-review</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Methodology</strong></td><td><code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.0 — Rules 0–8</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Contract</strong></td><td><code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> §14-Artifact Reference-Grade Gate · §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lookback Window</strong></td><td><strong>30 days</strong> (sibling-run ingestion per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3467,7 +3467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rule</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R-0</strong> Two-pass iteration (Pass 1 + Pass 2 improvement)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Pass 1 synthesis + analysis created at t+0–15 min; Pass 2 critical re-read replaced generic language with dok_id citations, added Election-2026 lens, expanded Nordic benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-1</strong> MCP-only factual sourcing (no fabrication)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>7 Riksdag MCP tool calls (sync_status, propositioner, betankanden, motioner, interpellationer, fragor, voteringar), 8 World Bank indicators, g0v.se department-analysis call</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-2</strong> Evidence tables with dok_id citations throughout</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Every SWOT entry, stakeholder perspective, scenario trigger, and risk register row carries explicit dok_id (HD03100, HD03218, HD01KU33, etc.)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-3</strong> Mermaid diagrams (≥ 1 per major file)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> timeline + mindmap · <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> decision flowchart · <code>comparative-international.md</code> xychart-beta · <code>swot-analysis.md</code> quadrant</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-4</strong> 8-party coverage (M, SD, KD, L, S, V, C, MP)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> §Party Activity Analysis + <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-5</strong> Election-2026 lens (confidence-scaled)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Every scenario, stakeholder, and risk carries ⬛/🟥/🟧/🟩/🟦 confidence</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-6</strong> Tier-C 14-artifact completeness</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>14 files present; all at or above byte-threshold after Pass 2 retrofit (see §3 below)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-7</strong> Upstream watchpoint reconciliation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>See §2 below — 16 upstream watchpoints reconciled, zero silent drops</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-8</strong> Depth tier match (<code>deep</code> = 3 iterations, ≥ 5 SWOT stakeholders, ≥ 2 charts, mindmap)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>3 iterations completed; 8-stakeholder SWOT; 4+ charts; Mermaid mindmap in synthesis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis">2. 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis">2. 🔁 Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Mandatory per SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Recent Daily Knowledge-Base Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_patternsmd-recent-daily-knowledge-base-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lookback scope</strong>: 30 days of sibling daily runs (2026-03-20 → 2026-04-19) + <code>weekly-review/2026-04-18</code> + <code>month-ahead/2026-04-19</code> + prior monthly baseline (<code>2026-03-30</code>).</p>
 <p><strong>Hard rule</strong>: Every forward indicator issued by a sibling run within the lookback window is explicitly reconciled. No silent drops.</p>
 
@@ -3615,7 +3615,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2--upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-mandatory-per-shared_prompt_pat
 <p><strong>Reconciliation integrity</strong>: 16 watchpoints · 13 carried forward · 2 carried with justified adjustment · 1 retired with reason · 0 silent drops. <strong>Contract satisfied.</strong></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-19 15:25 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_propositioner, get_motioner, get_betankanden, search_voteringar, search_anforanden, get_fragor, get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 1200
@@ -3629,7 +3629,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 200 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 200 documents</li>
@@ -3639,9 +3639,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 200 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 200 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-17 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3689,7 +3706,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:04.374Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:25.739Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html b/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html
index 02cbc9e31a..ac53004b91 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Realtime Monitor 1219">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.558Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.940Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.558Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:25.940Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1219","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) on 2026-04-17 advanced a second Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) amendment in the same riksmöte — betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — narrowing offentlighetsprincipen by…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:04.558Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1219","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) on 2026-04-17 advanced a second Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) amendment in the same riksmöte — betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — narrowing offentlighetsprincipen by…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:25.940Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -236,10 +236,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-19-1219</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or international-affairs decision based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs / 2 weeks / post-election 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH on lead selection; MEDIUM on post-election outcomes</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) on 2026-04-17 advanced a second <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (TF) amendment in the same riksmöte — betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — narrowing offentlighetsprincipen by removing digital materials seized during husrannsakan from the definition of <em>allmän handling</em> until material is "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>." First reading is scheduled for 2026-04-22. Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on the narrowing — the amendment cannot take effect before January 2027.</strong> On the same 24-hour window, PM Ulf Kristersson and FM Maria Malmer Stenergard tabled Sweden's accession to the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine (HD03231)</strong> — the first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg — and the <strong>Convention on the International Compensation Commission for Ukraine (HD03232)</strong>, whose €260bn frozen-asset framework creates the financial accountability arm. <strong>The coordinated royal visit of H.M. King Carl Gustaf + FM Malmer Stenergard to Kyiv on 2026-04-17 — one day after both Ukraine propositions were tabled — elevates the package to a national-commitment signal that transcends partisan politics.</strong> The cluster reveals a paradox — Sweden narrowing domestic transparency while advancing international accountability — explicitly flagged as the opposition-exploitable campaign theme for September 2026. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Publication Decision; DIW 8.48 vs 8.33</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO engagement posture</strong> (SJF, RSF-SE, TU, Utgivarna)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> W1 × T1 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §KU33 benchmarks</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande / Chamber vote 2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia hybrid-threat monitoring heightening</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §4 Russia ops · Kill Chain §3 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> Wildcard W1</td><td align="right">Continuous; step-up immediately on HD03231 chamber vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The #1 finding is the KU33 grundlag amendment.</strong> Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan until <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong> — whether it is read strictly (narrow carve-out) or discretionarily (broad chilling effect) decides whether this is a limited reform or a systemic press-freedom regression. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) + compensation commission (HD03232) are co-prominent.</strong> Global news-value 9.0; no direct Swedish fiscal burden for reparations (funded from Russian frozen assets); administrative contribution ≈ SEK 50-200m/yr; cross-party consensus near-universal (≈ 349 MPs). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met.</strong> All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5 are covered in the published article (KU33, KU32, Ukraine package, CU28). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 9 ministers / party leaders / institutional actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 9 ministers / party leaders / institutional actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-act
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th><th align="center">Primary dok_id</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader; signatory HD03231 + HD03232</td><td>Political owner of both the constitutional and foreign-policy packages; legacy bet on Ukraine accountability</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232, HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, FM)</td><td>Tribunal architect; Kyiv visit with King</td><td>First-aggression-tribunal-since-Nuremberg framing; norm-entrepreneurship capital</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, Justitieminister)</td><td>KU33 investigative-integrity champion</td><td>Defines "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" interpretation in practice; owner of Strömmer crime-enforcement agenda (KU33, HD03246 juvenile justice)</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, Finansminister)</td><td>Spring budget architect</td><td>Sets fiscal envelope for HD03232 administrative contribution; tight 2026 margins</td><td align="center">HD0399, HD03100 (upstream context)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, party leader)</td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Her position on KU33 second reading will decide post-election coalition arithmetic</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader)</td><td>Liberal identity; coalition partner</td><td>Most press-freedom sensitive inside Tidö; Lagrådet outcome may force repositioning</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, party leader)</td><td>Left opposition</td><td>Campaign voice against KU33 on civil-liberties grounds</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>Green opposition</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate; environmental-inspection access at stake in KU33</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmy Åkesson</strong> (SD, party leader)</td><td>Tidö coalition partner</td><td>Owner of SD cost-resistance line on HD03232; can break cooperation</td><td align="center">HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H.M. King Carl Gustaf XVI</strong></td><td>Swedish head of state</td><td>Kyiv visit 2026-04-17 elevates HD03231/232 beyond partisan frame</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional-review council</td><td>Pending proportionality yttrande on KU33 is the single most consequential pre-vote signal</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Justitieombudsman Erik Nymansson</strong></td><td>Riksdagens JO</td><td>Post-implementation monitoring of "tillförd" discretion</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ann-Sofie Alm</strong> (M, KU chair)</td><td>Committee chair</td><td>Formally proposed adoption of both KU32 and KU33</td><td align="center">HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong></td><td>Ukraine President</td><td>Hosted Kyiv visit; international counter-signatory</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch">🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch">🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch">🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th><th>Monitoring Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td><strong>Chamber vote on KU33 + KU32 (first reading)</strong></td><td>Constitutional-vote opportunity; watch for minority Ja-vote or SD abstention</td><td>Riksdag kammare protokoll</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026 (TBD)</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/KU32</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict "formellt tillförd" language ⇒ R2 ↓ 4 points; silent ⇒ R2 ↑ 4</td><td>Lagrådet publications</td></tr><tr><td>Apr–Jun 2026</td><td><strong>UU committee referral + hearing of HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Cross-party stance crystallisation; SD cost-reservations surface here</td><td>UU committee calendar</td></tr><tr><td>Late-May / Jun 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote on HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Tribunal + reparations accession vote; expected broad cross-party Ja</td><td>Riksdag kammare</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous</td><td><strong>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins</strong></td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators after HD03231 accession</td><td>SÄPO PUBLIKATIONER</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO joint remissvar (SJF, TU, Utgivarna, RSF-SE)</strong></td><td>Sets interpretive record on "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>"</td><td>Media-union statements</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td><strong>Swedish general election</strong></td><td>Post-election riksdag composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten</td></tr><tr><td>Jan 2027</td><td><strong>Post-election riksdag second reading of KU32 + KU33</strong></td><td>Binding constitutional vote; effect date 2027-01-01 if confirmed</td><td>Riksdag protokoll</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Top-5 Risks (detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Top-5 Risks (detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Top-5 Risks (deta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L × I</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Trend</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Ukraine Compensation Commission cost escalation beyond Swedish fiscal envelope</td><td align="center">0.55 × 0.75</td><td align="center">0.41</td><td align="center">↗ Rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>KU33 second-reading reversal after September 2026 election</td><td align="center">0.40 × 0.90</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">↗ Rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>SD cooperation withdrawal on HD03232 financing</td><td align="center">0.45 × 0.80</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">→ Stable</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>ECHR Article 10 legal challenge to KU33</td><td align="center">0.50 × 0.70</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">↗ Rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Russian hybrid interference targeting Swedish tribunal-advocacy posture</td><td align="center">0.40 × 0.75</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">↗ Rising (post-vote)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -541,20 +541,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>DIW v1.0 sensitivity-tested; KU33 remains #1 under all plausible weight permutations (see <code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Sensitivity)</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5.0 covered in article and per-document files</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (<strong>first</strong> reading, 2026-04-22)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Established KU patterns; coalition majority secure on first reading</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (<strong>second</strong> reading, Jan 2027)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends entirely on 2026 election outcome — inherent electoral uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td>"<em>Formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" interpretation prediction</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Interpretively fragile; three plausible postures documented in <code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 Swedish administrative contribution estimate</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong></td><td>GDP-proportional extrapolation; Commission secretariat cost model not yet published</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Historical pattern (post-NATO accession 2024) suggests rising baseline; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US administration position on HD03231 tribunal</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; administration may shift toward disengagement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md">Manifest</a></p>
 <p>Per-document: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md">HD01KU33 (LEAD, L3)</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md">HD03231 + HD03232 (L2+)</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md">HD01KU32 (L2+)</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SYN-ID</strong>: SYN-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: red-team box, analyst-confidence meter, ACH anchor)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on lead selection · MEDIUM on post-election outcomes
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[📰 Lead: KU33&#x3C;br/>Constitutional Amendment&#x3C;br/>DIW 8.48] --> B{Twin Tension}
     C[🌍 Co-Lead: Ukraine Package&#x3C;br/>Tribunal + Commission&#x3C;br/>DIW 8.33] --> B
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden
     style C fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style D fill:#ff6600,color:#fff
     style E fill:#00aa44,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-top-findings">Top Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-findings">Top Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -609,16 +609,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-findings">Top Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Significance</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Riksdag to vote on constitutional amendment (KU33) removing seized digital materials from offentlighetsprincipen</strong> — first reading scheduled for 2026-04-22; second reading required post-September 2026 election</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>DIW 8.48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Sweden joins both Ukraine Special Tribunal (for Aggression) AND Compensation Commission</strong> — twin propositions (HD03231/HD03232) submitted to Riksdag 2026-04-16, coinciding with King Carl Gustaf + FM Malmer Stenergard's Kyiv visit</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>DIW 8.33</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>Second grundlag amendment (KU32)</strong> in same riksmöte — accessibility requirements for media; establishes pattern of constitutional modification as routine legislative tool</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>DIW 7.98</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>National housing rights register approved</strong> (CU28) — Riksdag to approve national bostadsrättsregister modernizing mortgage market; part of broader anti-financial-crime package. Tracked as context; DIW 5.93 is below the ≥7.0 article-section threshold so not featured in the breaking-news articles (per article-coverage gate).</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>DIW 5.93</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY LEAD</strong>: KU33 — Sweden's Constitutional Revision Committee has advanced an amendment to Tryckfrihetsförordningen removing police-seized digital materials from public record status, with the first-reading vote scheduled for 2026-04-22. This is the highest DIW-scored item (8.48) because of the 30% democratic infrastructure weighting — a constitutional change takes decades to reverse and directly affects press freedom and government accountability.</p>
 <p><strong>CO-LEAD</strong>: Ukraine Package — Sweden's simultaneous accession to the Special Tribunal for Aggression AND the International Compensation Commission for Ukraine, concurrent with the King's diplomatic Kyiv visit (2026-04-17), represents a historic commitment to Ukraine accountability that deserves equal prominence due to extraordinary news value.</p>
 <p><strong>MANDATORY RHETORICAL TENSION</strong>: These two lead stories embody a striking contradiction. Sweden, which is cementing itself as an international rule-of-law champion on Ukraine accountability, is simultaneously narrowing its own domestic transparency architecture. This tension is the analytical heart of this monitoring run and MUST be surfaced explicitly in any published article.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-aggregated-swot">Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregated-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregated-swot">Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregated-swot"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Strengths</strong>: Constitutional process integrity (KU33 vilande mechanism ensures democratic deliberation across election); Ukraine norm-entrepreneurship (Special Tribunal + Compensation Commission positions Sweden globally); cross-party consensus on Ukraine.</p>
 <p><strong>Weaknesses</strong>: Offentlighetsprincipen erosion risk — KU33 removes publicity presumption for seized materials; minority government dependency on SD (Tidö Agreement); pattern of incremental grundlag modification.</p>
 <p><strong>Opportunities</strong>: Sweden as EU rule-of-law leader; digital property market modernization (CU28 reduces mortgage fraud); NATO credibility deepening via Ukraine legal commitment.</p>
 <p><strong>Threats</strong>: ECHR Article 10 challenge (KU33); election risk that KU33 fails second reading if opposition wins September 2026; SD cost resistance on Ukraine compensation; Russian information operations targeting Sweden's Ukraine tribunal advocacy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-landscape-summary">Risk Landscape Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape-summary">Risk Landscape Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-landscape-summary">Risk Landscape Summary<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Priority</th><th>Risk</th><th>Score</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Ukraine cost escalation</td><td>0.41</td><td>24-36m</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>KU33 post-election reversal</td><td>0.36</td><td>12-18m</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SD cooperation withdrawal</td><td>0.36</td><td>3-9m</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ECHR challenge to KU33</td><td>0.35</td><td>6-24m</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch">Forward Indicators — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch">Forward Indicators — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -698,16 +698,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch">Forward Indicators — What to Wat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th><th>Alert threshold</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Chamber vote on KU33 + KU32</td><td>Constitutional votes; watch for minority opposition</td><td>Any Ja vote &#x3C; 175</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05 (est)</td><td>UU committee referral of HD03231/232</td><td>Ukraine propositions move to committee</td><td>Committee chair appointment</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06 (est)</td><td>UU betänkande on Ukraine package</td><td>Committee recommendation</td><td>Any SD reservation</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09</td><td>Swedish election</td><td>KU33 second reading fate</td><td>If S+V+MP win majority</td></tr><tr><td>2027-01</td><td>KU33 second reading (if confirmed election)</td><td>Final constitutional decision</td><td>Vote outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's GDP grew 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from -0.20% contraction in 2023), while inflation fell to 2.84% (from 8.55% in 2023). This improving but fragile macroeconomic position shapes the fiscal feasibility of Ukraine compensation contributions. Finance Minister Svantesson's Vårproposition (HD03100) projects continued modest growth, but the fiscal space for open-ended international commitments is constrained — a tension between Ukraine ambition and economic prudence that runs through HD03232.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-box">🛡️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Box<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-box"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team--devils-advocate-box">🛡️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Box<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team--devils-advocate-box"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>What would a steelman critique of this synthesis say?</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p><strong>Red-team position on the lead-story ranking</strong>: The DIW weighting gives KU33 (8.48) a 0.15-point edge over the Ukraine package (8.33). But this is within the epistemic error band of the DIW instrument itself (±0.20). Under a weight perturbation where Democratic Infrastructure falls from 0.30 to 0.25 and Cross-party rises from 0.10 to 0.15, the Ukraine package overtakes KU33. <strong>Verdict retained</strong> — KU33 remains the robust lead under 4 of 5 plausible weight permutations; the co-lead treatment explicitly handles the remaining case.</p>
 <p><strong>Red-team position on the rhetorical tension</strong>: The "domestic retrenchment vs international accountability" framing assumes these are in tension. An alternative framing: the two packages are <strong>coherent</strong> — both assert state prerogative over information (law-enforcement investigation integrity domestically; international-law enforcement integrity abroad). Under this framing there is no contradiction, only consistent state-capacity assertion. <strong>Verdict retained but surfaced</strong> — the tension framing is the <em>opposition's</em> expected rhetorical move, not the government's; article acknowledges both framings.</p>
 <p><strong>Red-team position on Scenario C (bear)</strong>: We assign Scenario C only 0.20 probability despite meaningful Lagrådet and SD cost-risk. An alternative analysis giving Scenario C 0.30 would require either (a) polling showing Tidö bloc &#x3C; 44% in May, or (b) an early SD public red-line on HD03232. Neither has materialised as of 2026-04-19. <strong>Verdict</strong>: Scenario C probability will be raised to 0.30 if either trigger fires.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-ach-informed">🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-uncertainties-ach-informed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties-ach-informed">🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-ach-informed"></a></h3>
 <p>Linked from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §ACH:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Will "formellt tillförd bevisning" be read strictly or discretionarily?</strong> Strict ⇒ narrow reform; discretionary ⇒ systemic chilling. This single interpretive question dominates KU33 downstream impact. Lagrådet yttrande is the decisive early signal. <code>[Confidence: MEDIUM; will update on Lagrådet publication]</code></li>
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-ach-informed">🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed
 <li><strong>Will SD hold or defect on HD03232?</strong> SD's cost-transparency demand is the most likely fracture point; no public red line yet. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Will Russian hybrid response escalate after HD03231 chamber vote?</strong> Baseline rising post-NATO accession (2024); tribunal accession adds target signature. <code>[MEDIUM on direction / LOW on magnitude]</code></li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Delta from 1434</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>First-reading vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>Second-reading vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd" interpretation</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 contribution sizing</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">new</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal posture</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-file-navigation">🔗 Cross-File Navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-file-navigation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-file-navigation">🔗 Cross-File Navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-file-navigation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>For the one-page decision brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
 <li>For scenario probabilities and ACH grid: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
@@ -777,12 +777,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-file-navigation">🔗 Cross-File Navigation<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>For per-document deep-dive: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a> (LEAD, L3)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SIG-ID</strong>: SIG-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 — fully enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -850,31 +850,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix">Democratic-Impact Wei
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Document</th><th>DI (30%)</th><th>ParSig (15%)</th><th>PolImp (15%)</th><th>PubInt (15%)</th><th>Urgency (15%)</th><th>Cross-party (10%)</th><th><strong>DIW Score</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar från beslag/husrannsakan</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>9.5</td><td>8.0</td><td>7.5</td><td>8.5</td><td>7.0</td><td><strong>8.48</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03231+HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Tribunal + Compensation Commission</td><td>7.0</td><td>8.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.5</td><td>9.5</td><td><strong>8.33</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>9.5</td><td>7.0</td><td>6.5</td><td>8.5</td><td>8.0</td><td><strong>7.98</strong></td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>4.0</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.5</td><td>6.5</td><td>7.0</td><td>6.5</td><td><strong>5.93</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>DIW Weight Formula</strong>: (DI×0.30) + (ParSig×0.15) + (PolImp×0.15) + (PubInt×0.15) + (Urgency×0.15) + (Cross×0.10)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-1">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-1">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lead Story</strong>: <strong>HD01KU33</strong> — Score 8.48 (highest DIW, constitutional amendment)<br>
 <strong>Co-Lead</strong>: <strong>HD03231+HD03232</strong> — Score 8.33 (Ukraine law package, timely with royal diplomatic visit)<br>
 <strong>Secondary</strong>: <strong>HD01KU32</strong> — Score 7.98 (constitutional amendment, accessibility)</p>
 <p><strong>Rationale</strong>: KU33 scores highest because the 30% Democratic Infrastructure weight captures the constitutional significance of narrowing offentlighetsprincipen — a reversal that can only be undone after an election. The Ukraine propositions score only slightly lower due to extraordinary public interest (9.0) combined with the King's visit to Kyiv.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rhetorical-tension">Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rhetorical-tension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rhetorical-tension">Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rhetorical-tension"></a></h3>
 <p>The session presents a striking juxtaposition:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>KU33 <strong>narrows</strong> public transparency rights (offentlighetsprincipen) for law enforcement seizures</li>
 <li>The Ukraine package simultaneously advances Sweden's role in establishing international rule-of-law accountability mechanisms</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This tension between domestic transparency restriction and international accountability promotion MUST be surfaced in the article.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage-completeness-check">Coverage Completeness Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-completeness-check">Coverage Completeness Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-check"></a></h3>
 <p>Documents with DIW ≥ 7.0 requiring dedicated H3 sections:</p>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> HD01KU33 (8.48) → must be H3</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> HD03231+HD03232 (8.33) → must be H3</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> HD01KU32 (7.98) → must be H3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PUBLISH</strong>: YES — HIGH severity (maximum DIW 8.48 > threshold 7.0)<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Breaking / Realtime update<br>
 <strong>Languages</strong>: EN + SV<br>
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (live MCP data, government sources confirmed)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>If we increase Cross-party weight to 15% (at expense of DI):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Ukraine package moves to #1 (broad cross-party + international weight)</li>
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Result: Ukraine package becomes co-equal lead, rhetorical tension becomes more prominent</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This sensitivity confirms the article should treat BOTH stories as co-leads.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs">Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs">Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs">Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity R
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Perturbation</th><th align="center">DI</th><th align="center">ParSig</th><th align="center">PolImp</th><th align="center">PubInt</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Cross</th><th align="center">KU33</th><th align="center">Ukraine</th><th align="center">KU32</th><th align="center">CU28</th><th align="center">Lead?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Baseline (published)</strong></td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center"><strong>8.48</strong></td><td align="center">8.33</td><td align="center">7.98</td><td align="center">5.93</td><td align="center">KU33 ✅</td></tr><tr><td>DI −0.05, Cross +0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">8.15</td><td align="center"><strong>8.35</strong></td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">5.95</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td>PubInt +0.05, DI −0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">8.10</td><td align="center"><strong>8.43</strong></td><td align="center">7.50</td><td align="center">5.98</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency +0.05, DI −0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center"><strong>8.45</strong></td><td align="center">8.48</td><td align="center">7.90</td><td align="center">5.87</td><td align="center">Tied</td></tr><tr><td>PolImp +0.05, DI −0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">8.28</td><td align="center"><strong>8.45</strong></td><td align="center">7.75</td><td align="center">5.95</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>All equal (baseline check)</strong></td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">8.25</td><td align="center"><strong>8.67</strong></td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">6.25</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: KU33 wins outright under baseline weights (Democratic-Infrastructure emphasis). Under 4 of 5 alternative weights, Ukraine package takes the lead or ties. This confirms the <strong>co-lead treatment</strong> is analytically sound — either story could plausibly be the lead under minor weight perturbation, justifying equal article prominence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision-annex">Publication Decision Annex<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-annex"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision-annex">Publication Decision Annex<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-annex"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1041,12 +1041,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-publication-decision-annex">Publication Decision Annex<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Value</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Article type</strong></td><td>Breaking / Realtime</td><td>Maximum DIW 8.48 ≥ 7.0 threshold</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Languages published</strong></td><td>EN + SV</td><td>Standard for breaking realtime runs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Future translations</strong></td><td>All 14 languages</td><td>Queue via news-translate workflow, priority HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Headline structure</strong></td><td>Lead (KU33) + Co-Lead (Ukraine)</td><td>DIW sensitivity confirms co-lead</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coverage of CU28</strong></td><td>Secondary section (weighted 5.93)</td><td>Meets coverage-completeness threshold</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Royal-visit framing</strong></td><td>Included in lede paragraph</td><td>S2 strength amplifies HD03231/232 package</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rhetorical tension framing</strong></td><td>Explicitly named</td><td>Mandatory per R5; tension is analytical heart</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence declaration</strong></td><td>HIGH on lead; MEDIUM post-election</td><td>Per <code>executive-brief.md</code> analyst-confidence meter</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>STA-ID</strong>: STA-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched — 8 stakeholder groups + named actors)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">radar
     title Stakeholder Impact Scores (0-10)
     Citizens: 7
@@ -1057,8 +1057,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     International EU: 9
     Judiciary Constitutional: 9
     Media Public Opinion: 9</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis">8 Stakeholder Group Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis">8 Stakeholder Group Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (7/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: MIXED</p>
 <p>Citizens face two countervailing developments:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" h
 <li>Action available: Contact MP before chamber vote 2026-04-22</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Individual Swedish citizens represented by TU (Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå) editorial interest; organized through media unions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd">2. Government parties (M, KD, L) + support party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd">2. Government parties (M, KD, L) + support party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (8/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: SUPPORTIVE</p>
 <p><strong>Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong>: Leading the Ukraine proposition package personally (signed HD03231, HD03232). The King's Kyiv visit coinciding with parliamentary accession creates a diplomatic legacy moment. Kristersson faces pressure from SD on cost limits.</p>
 <p><strong>Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong>: Accompanied King Carl Gustaf to Ukraine on 2026-04-17; her signature on both Ukraine propositions places her at the centre of Swedish norm-leadership on international accountability.</p>
@@ -1081,44 +1081,44 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd">2. Government parties
 <p><strong>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)</strong>: KU33 advances law enforcement interests (seizure secrecy); HD03246 (juvenile justice, from previous run) continues his tough-on-crime agenda.</p>
 <p><strong>SD</strong>: Jimmy Åkesson's party must balance NATO/Ukraine support (for credibility) against voter base skepticism about international financial commitments. SD's cooperation in the Tidö Agreement is not unconditional; Ukraine costs are a potential red line.</p>
 <p><strong>KD</strong>: Strongly supportive of Ukraine — consistent with Christian democratic values; no risk of defection on HD03231/232.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (7/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: MIXED — SUPPORT Ukraine, OPPOSE KU33</p>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>: Generally supportive of Ukraine accountability; former Foreign Minister Ann Linde championed similar international justice initiatives. However, S will scrutinize the proportionality of KU33's secrecy carve-out.</p>
 <p><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>: Strong Ukraine support (unusual alignment with government); LIKELY TO OPPOSE KU33 on civil liberties grounds. V's press freedom record suggests they will seek the narrowest possible reading of the amendment.</p>
 <p><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>: Support Ukraine; LIKELY TO RAISE CONCERNS about KU33's impact on environmental inspection transparency — seized documents in environmental enforcement are directly affected.</p>
 <p><strong>Key tension</strong>: S may feel politically trapped — opposing KU33 civil liberties restrictions while supporting the same government's Ukraine propositions creates messaging complexity.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM (5/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: MIXED</p>
 <p><strong>Real estate sector</strong>: Strongly supportive of CU28 (national housing register) — the sector has lobbied for this for years to reduce bostadsrätts fraud and enable digital mortgage processing. SBAB, Swedbank, and major mortgage lenders benefit from accurate pledge registration.</p>
 <p><strong>Media companies (TV4, SVT, commercial press)</strong>: KU33 and KU32 directly affect their operating environment. KU32 (accessibility requirements) adds compliance costs; KU33 reduces their access to seized material.</p>
 <p><strong>Technology sector</strong>: HD03244 (public sector interoperability, from April 16) creates new market for digital services; not covered in this run but context for policy trend.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (8/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: CRITICAL of KU33, SUPPORTIVE of Ukraine</p>
 <p><strong>Transparency International Sweden</strong>: Will likely issue statement against KU33 — seizure document exemptions reduce accountability for law enforcement misconduct.</p>
 <p><strong>Reportrar utan gränser / Swedish section of RSF</strong>: Specifically threatened by KU33 — investigative journalists rely on access to seized materials to document police operations.</p>
 <p><strong>Amnesty International Sweden</strong>: Strongly supportive of Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) — consistent with their mandate on accountability for international crimes including aggression.</p>
 <p><strong>Human Rights Watch</strong>: HD03232 (Compensation Commission) represents a model they have promoted globally; Sweden's accession strengthens the institution.</p>
 <p><strong>Brottsofferjouren</strong>: CU28 housing register indirectly reduces property crime; supportive.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH (9/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: POSITIVE (Ukraine), WATCHING (KU33)</p>
 <p><strong>Council of Europe</strong>: Monitoring KU33 for compatibility with European Convention on Human Rights Article 10 (freedom of expression). Sweden's accession to Special Tribunal (HD03231) aligns with Council of Europe's Reykjavik Declaration (2023) on Ukraine accountability.</p>
 <p><strong>European Commission</strong>: KU32 implements EU Accessibility Act 2025 into Swedish grundlag — positive compliance signal. KU33 is a national matter but ECHR review could involve Commission amicus.</p>
 <p><strong>NATO allies</strong>: Sweden's contribution to NATO's forward presence in Finland (HD03220, from previous run) and the Ukraine propositions reinforce Sweden's credibility as a committed alliance member — especially important as Sweden is still relatively new to NATO (2024 accession).</p>
 <p><strong>Ukraine government</strong>: HD03231 and HD03232 directly advance Ukrainian war accountability interests. Combined with the King's visit, this represents Sweden's strongest pro-Ukraine legislative moment since NATO accession.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH (9/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: PROFESSIONAL (implementing); POTENTIALLY CRITICAL on KU33 scope</p>
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong>: Has already reviewed the government's grundlag proposals. Lagrådet's scrutiny of KU33's proportionality — specifically whether the seizure exemption is narrowly tailored enough — determines whether the first reading vote generates legal controversy.</p>
 <p><strong>Riksdagens justitieombudsman (JO)</strong>: Erik Nymansson (current Chefsjustitieombudsman) oversees public administration transparency. JO has jurisdiction to investigate instances where the KU33 carve-out is misapplied. JO will be an important monitoring actor post-implementation.</p>
 <p><strong>Justitiekanslern (JK)</strong>: Ultimate defender of state compliance with ECHR and EU law. If KU33 generates ECHR complaints, JK's position becomes significant.</p>
 <p><strong>International Criminal Court</strong>: Sweden is already an ICC member. Adding Special Tribunal (HD03231) creates a parallel jurisdiction for aggression crimes — complementary to ICC, which cannot try heads-of-state of non-member states (Russia is not an ICC member for this purpose).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH (9/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: CONFLICTED</p>
 <p><strong>Dagens Nyheter / Svenska Dagbladet</strong>: Both major broadsheets will editorialize strongly on KU33 — this is precisely the kind of constitutional change that Swedish press has historically contested vigorously.</p>
 <p><strong>SVT Nyheter / Aktuellt</strong>: King's Ukraine visit provides compelling broadcast news hook; easy to under-report the technical constitutional dimensions of KU33.</p>
 <p><strong>Social media</strong>: KU33 unlikely to break through to mass audience unless media frame it as "press freedom restriction." Ukraine tribunal has higher virality due to royal diplomatic dimension.</p>
 <p><strong>Public polling context</strong>: Latest Riksdagen confidence polling (early April 2026) shows Tidö coalition at approximately 48% combined — still below 50% majority, making the autumn election highly competitive. Ukraine policy enjoys cross-party public support (~68% in most recent SOM Institute data).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network">🕸️ Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">🕸️ Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     PM[Ulf Kristersson&#x3C;br/>PM · M] --> FM[Maria Malmer Stenergard&#x3C;br/>FM · M]
     PM --> JM[Gunnar Strömmer&#x3C;br/>Justitieminister · M]
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network">🕸️ Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>Civil-society coalition</strong> (SJF + TU + Utgivarna + RSF-SE) is a coordinated campaign network specific to KU33.</li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet → KU33</strong> is the single most consequential pre-vote edge in the network.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree">🌳 Tidö Coalition Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree">🌳 Tidö Coalition Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[Tidö Coalition Stability] --> Q1{HD03232 costs&#x3C;br/>published?}
     Q1 -->|Yes, capped| P1[P breach = 0.10]
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree">🌳 Tidö Coalition Frac
 <li>Åkesson column / SR Ekot interview referencing HD03232</li>
 <li>Budget-deal negotiating posture on 2026 Vårändringsbudget</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group">📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 sentences per group)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group">📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 sentences per group)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group">📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 se
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>3-Sentence Briefing</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens (pro-access)</strong></td><td>Your right to access seized-material records is being narrowed by KU33. The amendment cannot take effect until post-election second reading in 2027. Contact your MP before 2026-04-22 chamber vote.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government coalition</strong></td><td>KU33 advances law-enforcement integrity; HD03231/232 delivers Ukraine-accountability legacy. King's Kyiv visit provides diplomatic signal. SD cost-resistance on HD03232 is the coalition vulnerability.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S opposition</strong></td><td>KU33 gives you a civil-liberties argument without Ukraine-aid trade-off. Second-reading veto requires post-election majority. Messaging complexity — narrow "not anti-Ukraine" framing.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V + MP opposition</strong></td><td>Grundlag-protection is your established brand. Coordinate with press-freedom coalition. Raise environmental-inspection access concern for MP.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media companies</strong></td><td>KU33 removes an investigative-journalism access channel. KU32 adds digital-accessibility compliance cost. Lagrådet yttrande is your earliest intervention window.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil society (press freedom)</strong></td><td>File coordinated remissvar. Prepare ECHR complaint draft. Engage Venice Commission through CoE channels.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International EU / CoE</strong></td><td>Watch Venice Commission engagement on KU33 Art 10 proportionality. HD03231 accession closes ICC jurisdictional gap on Russia aggression.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media &#x26; public opinion</strong></td><td>Frame the rhetorical tension (domestic narrowing vs international accountability). Royal Kyiv visit is the broadcast-friendly entry point for Ukraine; KU33 is the technical-constitutional narrative.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SCN-ID</strong>: SCN-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH on base scenarios; LOW-MEDIUM on wildcards
 <strong>Horizon Bands</strong>: 30 days · 90 days · post-September-2026 election</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-landscape-overview">🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-landscape-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-landscape-overview">🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-landscape-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     Now[2026-04-19 12:19 UTC&#x3C;br/>State: Both clusters submitted&#x3C;br/>KU33 + Ukraine package] --> D1[2026-04-22&#x3C;br/>First Reading Vote]
     D1 -->|Ja ≥ 175, SD holds| B1[Base Scenario&#x3C;br/>P = 0.55]
@@ -1262,8 +1262,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-landscape-overview">🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview<a clas
     style W1 fill:#c0392b,color:#fff</pre>
 <p>Probabilities are point estimates with a ±0.10 epistemic band. They are updated against new Lagrådet, SÄPO, and polling signals per the Bayesian procedure in <code>risk-assessment.md</code> §Bayesian Update.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios">🧭 Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-base-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055">Scenario A — <strong>Base Case: Orderly Dual-Track Advance</strong> (P = 0.55)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios">🧭 Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055">Scenario A — <strong>Base Case: Orderly Dual-Track Advance</strong> (P = 0.55)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: First reading of KU33 + KU32 passes 2026-04-22 with government majority (M + SD + L + KD holding). Lagrådet yttrande interprets "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" conservatively enough to neutralise the strongest civil-liberties critique. HD03231 and HD03232 are referred to UU in late April, return as a betänkande in May–June, and pass chamber with cross-party Ja (SD attaches a cost-transparency reservation to HD03232). Ukraine tribunal accession completes before summer recess. Campaign season frames KU33 as a civil-liberties vs. law-enforcement trade-off; S position remains ambiguous into August polling.</p>
 
 
@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055">Scenario A 
 <li>SOM-institute September poll shows Tidö bloc below 44% ⇒ downgrade post-election confirmation probability by 15 points</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020">Scenario B — <strong>Bull Case: Lagrådet Narrows, Ukraine Surges</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020">Scenario B — <strong>Bull Case: Lagrådet Narrows, Ukraine Surges</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande on KU33 imposes a strict, literal reading of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" — requiring formal documentation of incorporation before the carve-out attaches. This neutralises the SJF/RSF critique and lifts opposition uncertainty. Meanwhile, Ukraine propositions become a unifying national moment after the King's Kyiv visit saturates broadcast cycles. Cross-party support on HD03231 + HD03232 becomes unanimous in chamber. SD formally endorses both on Åkesson's public platform. Sweden positions as a norm-entrepreneur, attracting a follow-up invitation to host a preliminary tribunal preparatory conference.</p>
 
 
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020">Scenar
 <li>Magdalena Andersson makes a public statement supporting KU33 proportionality</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020">Scenario C — <strong>Bear Case: Procedural Drag + SD Defection</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020">Scenario C — <strong>Bear Case: Procedural Drag + SD Defection</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on the discretionary dimension of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>," amplifying SJF/RSF criticism. Tidö coalition holds first reading vote but with &#x3C; 180 Ja votes (signalling internal fracture). SD announces a formal reservation on HD03232 cost projections, forcing a UU-committee compromise that inserts a Swedish contribution ceiling. S seizes on the KU33 ambiguity as a pre-election wedge issue. Press-freedom NGO coalition files a preemptive ECHR complaint. September election produces S-led minority government; KU33 second reading is renegotiated with a statutory (not grundlag) fallback.</p>
 
 
@@ -1369,8 +1369,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020">Scenario
 <li>SOM poll shows Tidö bloc ≤ 44% combined in May/June 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact">⚡ Two Wildcards — Low-Probability / High-Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high">Wildcard W1 — <strong>Russian hybrid retaliation after HD03231 chamber vote</strong> (P = 0.04 · Impact = HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact">⚡ Two Wildcards — Low-Probability / High-Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high">Wildcard W1 — <strong>Russian hybrid retaliation after HD03231 chamber vote</strong> (P = 0.04 · Impact = HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's formal accession to the Special Tribunal for Aggression makes it the newest target of a pattern of Russian hybrid operations previously documented against Baltic and Nordic states (e.g., the 2023 SIS/SÄPO reports on Russian information ops targeting Swedish NATO discourse). Attack vectors documented in <code>threat-analysis.md</code> §4 include: (a) coordinated inauthentic behaviour amplifying KU33 "hypocrisy" framing in Swedish-language social media; (b) targeted phishing against UD officials working on tribunal accession; (c) DDoS against riksdagen.se during chamber-vote windows; (d) opportunistic diplomatic expulsion retaliation.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators to promote P from 0.04 → 0.15</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p-
 <li>Russian embassy (or FSB-linked channels) public commentary naming Swedish officials</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium">Wildcard W2 — <strong>US administration withdrawal from tribunal coordination</strong> (P = 0.06 · Impact = MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium">Wildcard W2 — <strong>US administration withdrawal from tribunal coordination</strong> (P = 0.06 · Impact = MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium"></a></h4>
 <p>The US political posture on the Special Tribunal has been ambiguous across recent transitions. A formal withdrawal from tribunal coordination, or a public statement questioning its legitimacy, would be damaging — not because US membership is required, but because it would embolden non-European participating states to disengage and would rhetorically weaken the tribunal's claim to be "the international community's" response. Sweden's accession momentum could be seen as the ceiling rather than the floor of Western commitment.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators to promote P from 0.06 → 0.20</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-
 <li>Withdrawal of at least one non-European tribunal participant in the 30-day window</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses">🔬 ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses">🔬 ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <p>We test the question: <strong>"What is the probability KU33 second reading confirms the grundlag amendment in January 2027?"</strong></p>
 <p>Five hypotheses are weighed against six pieces of evidence (each marked Consistent <strong>C</strong> / Inconsistent <strong>I</strong> / Neutral <strong>N</strong> with the hypothesis).</p>
 
@@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses">🔬 ACH — Analysis of Comp
 <p><strong>Converted base probability</strong>: P(H2) ≈ 0.40 · P(H1) ≈ 0.25 · P(H3) ≈ 0.20 · P(H4) ≈ 0.10 · P(H5) ≈ 0.05.
 Aggregating H1 + H2 + modified confirmations gives the <code>executive-brief.md</code> second-reading confirmation forecast of <strong>≈ 0.55</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts">📅 Monitoring Trigger Calendar — Mapped to Scenario Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts">📅 Monitoring Trigger Calendar — Mapped to Scenario Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1529,14 +1529,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts">📅 Monitor
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Scenario Updated</th><th>New Signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>KU33 + KU32 first reading vote</td><td>A/B/C</td><td>Ja count; SD abstention pattern</td></tr><tr><td>≤ 2026-05-15</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/32</td><td>A → B or A → C</td><td>Language on "<em>formellt tillförd</em>"</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05</td><td>UU committee hearing HD03231</td><td>A</td><td>SD reservation filing</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05</td><td>UU committee hearing HD03232</td><td>A → C on cost objection</td><td>SD cost-ceiling demand</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06 (est)</td><td>Chamber vote HD03231/232</td><td>A</td><td>Cross-party Ja count</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06 to 09</td><td>Monthly SOM polling</td><td>Bayesian update on post-election P</td><td>Tidö bloc vs. opposition bloc</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Swedish general election</td><td>Terminal scenario fork</td><td>New riksdag composition</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09 → 12</td><td>Government formation</td><td>H1/H2/H3 conditional on majority</td><td>KU33 coalition arithmetic</td></tr><tr><td>2026-12 or 2027-01</td><td>KU33 second reading</td><td>TERMINAL</td><td>Confirmed / modified / rejected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-work">🔗 Cross-Reference to Upstream Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-work"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-work">🔗 Cross-Reference to Upstream Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-work"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scenario continuity</strong> with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md</code></a>: the grundlag base/bull/bear structure introduced in 1434 is retained; probabilities updated downward for base (−0.05) on the basis of HD03232 cost uncertainty emerging in 1219.</li>
 <li><strong>Post-election probability priors</strong> drawn from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> (if present) or the closest weekly-review available; divergences from weekly-review scenarios are justified in <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Probability-Alignment Audit.</li>
 <li><strong>Russia hybrid W1</strong> priors: leverage SÄPO and MUST documented post-NATO-accession hybrid posture; see <code>threat-analysis.md</code> §4 for the intelligence base.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-confidence-markers--known-limitations">⚠️ Confidence Markers &#x26; Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-confidence-markers--known-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-markers--known-limitations">⚠️ Confidence Markers &#x26; Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-markers--known-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Base-case probability (0.55)</strong> has a ±0.10 epistemic band — do not treat as precise.</li>
 <li><strong>Post-election conditional probabilities</strong> depend on poll-to-seat translations that are non-linear near majority boundary (around 175 seats).</li>
@@ -1546,12 +1546,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-confidence-markers--known-limitations">⚠️ Confidence Markers
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-01 (after KU33 first reading + Lagrådet yttrande) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 6 (L3 tier) + ACH doctrine</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>RSK-ID</strong>: RSK-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: 10 risks, interconnection graph, ALARP mapping)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Parliamentary Activity 2026-04-19
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     Housing Registry Delay: [0.40, 0.60]
     Grundlag Rejection 2027: [0.85, 0.30]
     Ukraine Tribunal Stalls: [0.60, 0.35]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-risk-register">Ranked Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-risk-register">Ranked Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1646,15 +1646,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-risk-register">Ranked Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (L)</th><th>Impact (I)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Trend</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>KU33 confirmed by post-2026 riksdag</strong> — opposition wins September 2026 election and rejects second reading</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.90</td><td><strong>0.36</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Monitor election polls; alert if opposition bloc exceeds 50%</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Ukraine compensation costs exceed projections</strong> — International Compensation Commission levies exceed SEK 2bn annually</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.75</td><td><strong>0.41</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Track commission establishment milestones; fiscal provisions in spring budget</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>SD withdraws cooperation on Ukraine financing</strong> — SD voter base resistant to open-ended Ukraine financial commitments</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.80</td><td><strong>0.36</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Track SD party statements on Ukraine cost; watch Åkesson statements</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>KU33 challenged under ECHR Art 10 (free expression)</strong> — Swedish journalists union or Reporters Without Borders files complaint</td><td>0.50</td><td>0.70</td><td><strong>0.35</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Monitor Council of Europe response; track JK (Justitiekanslern) guidance</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>Housing register (CU28) delayed</strong> — Industry opposition slows implementation past Jan 2027</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.45</td><td><strong>0.18</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Monitor Lantmäteriet capacity; track industry consultation</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td><strong>Grundlag amendment rejected</strong> — September 2026 election produces majority that refuses second reading</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.85</td><td><strong>0.26</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Electoral arithmetic: requires both S and V to oppose</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td><strong>Ukraine Tribunal stalls</strong> — Geopolitical shifts reduce participation; tribunal loses jurisdiction</td><td>0.35</td><td>0.65</td><td><strong>0.23</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Track Council of Europe participation numbers</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-analysis">Cascading Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-analysis">Cascading Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary risk chain</strong>: SD withdrawal (Risk 3) → budget deal collapse → government confidence vote → snap election → KU33 second reading fails (Risk 6) → constitutional amendment abandoned.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability of chain</strong>: P(3) × P(chain given 3) = 0.45 × 0.35 = <strong>0.16 (16%)</strong> — within planning horizon for 2026-2027.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-bayesian-update">Bayesian Update<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update">Bayesian Update<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update"></a></h3>
 <p>Prior probability (pre-session): Government stability = 0.65<br>
 New evidence: Multiple propositions passing committee, Ukraine propositions advancing = moderate positive signal<br>
 Posterior: Government stability = <strong>0.68</strong> (+0.03 update)</p>
 <p>Evidence weight: KU committees advancing government proposals without major dissent signals coalition cohesion is holding.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-by-dimension">Risk by Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-by-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-by-dimension">Risk by Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-by-dimension"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-by-dimension">Risk by Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Top Risk</th><th>Score</th><th>Time horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td>KU33 rejection in 2027</td><td>7.5/10</td><td>12-18 months</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>Ukraine cost escalation</td><td>7.0/10</td><td>24-36 months</td></tr><tr><td>Political</td><td>SD withdrawal from cooperation</td><td>6.5/10</td><td>3-9 months</td></tr><tr><td>Legal</td><td>ECHR challenge to KU33</td><td>6.0/10</td><td>6-24 months</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative</td><td>CU28 implementation delay</td><td>4.5/10</td><td>12-24 months</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks">Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks">Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks"></a></h3>
 <p>The following three additional risks complete the reference-grade register:</p>
 
 
@@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks">Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8</td><td><strong>Lagrådet silent on "formellt tillförd" discretion</strong> — weak yttrande amplifies SJF/RSF critique and hardens opposition position on KU33</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center"><strong>0.27</strong></td><td>0-30 days</td><td>Monitor Lagrådet publication calendar; prepare amendment draft</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td><strong>Russian hybrid interference escalation after HD03231 chamber vote</strong> — coordinated inauthentic behaviour, phishing against UD, DDoS against riksdagen.se</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td align="center"><strong>0.30</strong></td><td>0-90 days post-vote</td><td>SÄPO liaison heightened; CERT-SE vigilance; MSB public-communication preparedness</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td><strong>US administration withdraws from tribunal coordination</strong> — public statement questioning Special Tribunal legitimacy; emboldens non-European disengagement</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center"><strong>0.16</strong></td><td>3-12 months</td><td>Diplomatic contingency with DE, FR, UK, NL; NATO/CoE escalation path</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     R3[R3 SD Withdrawal] -->|triggers| R1[R1 Election reversal&#x3C;br/>of KU33]
     R3 -->|triggers| R2[R2 Ukraine cost escalation&#x3C;br/>harder to absorb]
@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>R8 amplifies R4 and R1</strong> — a weak Lagrådet yttrande both raises ECHR challenge probability and hardens opposition second-reading stance.</li>
 <li><strong>R2 → R3 feedback loop</strong> — if HD03232 passes with tight fiscal budget, subsequent contribution increases could trigger SD withdrawal.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping">ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping">ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping">ALARP (As Low As Reas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Current level</th><th align="center">Target level</th><th align="center">Mitigation cost</th><th align="center">Effectiveness</th><th align="center">ALARP verdict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1 KU33 election reversal</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">HIGH (coalition politics)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center"><strong>Accept</strong> — democratic design, cannot be mitigated away</td></tr><tr><td>R2 Ukraine cost escalation</td><td align="center">0.41</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (UU cost ceiling)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — attach cost cap in UU betänkande</td></tr><tr><td>R3 SD withdrawal</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (coalition renegotiation)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — transparency on HD03232 costs</td></tr><tr><td>R4 ECHR challenge</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">LOW (strict Lagrådet language)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — drive narrow "formellt tillförd" reading</td></tr><tr><td>R8 Weak Lagrådet</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">LOW (government submission quality)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — prepare responsive memorandum</td></tr><tr><td>R9 Russian hybrid</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">HIGH (hybrid defence investment)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce &#x26; Accept</strong> — partial</td></tr><tr><td>R10 US withdrawal</td><td align="center">0.16</td><td align="center">0.16</td><td align="center">HIGH (diplomatic capital)</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center"><strong>Accept</strong> — exogenous</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules">Bayesian Forward-Looking Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules">Bayesian Forward-Looking Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules"></a></h3>
 <p>Given a new signal at time t, update the posterior probability of each risk:</p>
 
 
@@ -1877,12 +1877,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules">Bayesian Forward-Looking Updat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Effect on</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande <strong>strict</strong> on "formellt tillförd"</td><td>R4 × 0.5 · R8 × 0.3 · R1 × 0.85</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande <strong>silent / discretionary</strong></td><td>R4 × 1.5 · R8 × 1.8 · R1 × 1.2</td></tr><tr><td>SD red-line on HD03232 costs</td><td>R3 × 2.0 · R1 × 1.3 · R2 × 0.7</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO threat-level increase (hybrid)</td><td>R9 × 2.0</td></tr><tr><td>US senior-official statement questioning tribunal</td><td>R10 × 2.5</td></tr><tr><td>SOM poll Tidö bloc &#x3C; 44%</td><td>R1 × 1.5 · R3 × 1.3</td></tr><tr><td>SOM poll Tidö bloc > 50%</td><td>R1 × 0.6 · R3 × 0.8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SWT-ID</strong>: SWT-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: full TOWS matrix, cluster-specific quadrants, Mermaid mindmap retained)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping">SWOT Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping">SWOT Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Swedish Parliament&#x3C;br/>April 19 2026))
     Strengths
@@ -1925,8 +1925,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping">SWOT Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="
       Ukraine Commitment vs. SD Voter Base Tension
         SD base less enthusiastic about Ukraine financial commitments
         Compensation commission funding unpredictable</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-quadrant-analysis">Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-quadrant-analysis">Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional process integrity</td><td>KU33 and KU32 both adopted as "vilande" — second reading must occur after election, ensuring democratic legitimacy</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability leadership</td><td>Sweden among ~40 states joining Special Tribunal; first European country to propose bilateral compensation framework alongside accession</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party Ukraine consensus</td><td>HD03231/232 submitted by FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M); expected broad support from S, M, L, C, KD, and MP</td><td>HD03231</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Offentlighetsprincipen narrowing</td><td>KU33 removes seized digital materials from "allmän handling" status — a carve-out that removes presumption of publicity</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Law enforcement opacity</td><td>Critics (V, MP expected) argue carve-out is disproportionate to stated crime-fighting rationale</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Minority government dependency</td><td>Kristersson government cannot pass any legislation without SD support; SD can extract policy concessions at each vote</td><td>All docs</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ukraine norm leadership premium</td><td>Sweden positioning as credible international law-builder strengthens EU standing</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Digital modernization</td><td>CU28 national bostadsrättsregister will reduce mortgage fraud and improve market transparency</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market integrity</td><td>Identity requirements for lagfart (HD01CU27) combined with CU28 register creates anti-money-laundering layer</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2050,11 +2050,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional backsliding</td><td>KU33 is the second grundlag narrowing in current riksmöte; pattern may draw international criticism</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Election timing risk</td><td>KU33 must be confirmed by post-September 2026 riksdag; if opposition wins majority, amendment could be rejected</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation commission cost</td><td>International Compensation Commission for Ukraine may involve Swedish financial contributions not yet quantified</td><td>HD03232</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-interference-analysis">TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-analysis">TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>S1×T1 (Strength-Threat interference)</strong>: Ukraine rule-of-law leadership (S) is in tension with the constitutional narrowing (W) — Sweden cannot credibly champion international accountability while narrowing domestic transparency.</p>
 <p><strong>W1×O1 (Weakness-Opportunity interference)</strong>: If KU33 attracts Council of Europe criticism, it could undermine Sweden's Ukraine norm-leadership narrative, turning an asset into a liability.</p>
 <p><strong>O3×T3 (Opportunity-Threat interaction)</strong>: Housing market modernization creates opportunity for anti-corruption, but Ukraine compensation funding uncertainty creates fiscal pressure that could divert resources from other reforms.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-full-tows-interference-matrix">Full TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-full-tows-interference-matrix">Full TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>The TOWS matrix reads <em>Internal × External</em> interactions to derive strategic postures:</p>
 
 
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-full-tows-interference-matrix">Full TOWS Interference Matrix<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th><strong>Opportunities (O)</strong></th><th><strong>Threats (T)</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths (S)</strong></td><td><strong>SO — Maxi-Maxi (leverage)</strong></td><td><strong>ST — Maxi-Mini (defend)</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>S2 × O1: Royal Kyiv visit + tribunal accession = EU rule-of-law leadership premium</td><td>S1 × T1: Grundlag two-reading design is itself the defence against election-driven reversal</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>S3 × O2: Cross-party Ukraine consensus + housing modernization = coherent law-and-order narrative</td><td>S2 × T2: Ukraine norm-entrepreneurship creates reputational shield against KU33 criticism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses (W)</strong></td><td><strong>WO — Mini-Maxi (fix)</strong></td><td><strong>WT — Mini-Mini (retreat)</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>W1 × O1: Offentlighetsprincipen narrowing <em>undermines</em> rule-of-law leadership → fix via strict Lagrådet language</td><td>W1 × T1: KU33 narrowing + ECHR challenge = reputational double-hit; prepare defence memorandum</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>W3 × O3: Minority-government dependency <em>fits</em> housing-reform MoU logic — structured consultative reform</td><td>W3 × T2: SD cost resistance on HD03232 + tight fiscal space = budget-deal fragility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-specific-quadrants">Cluster-Specific Quadrants<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-specific-quadrants"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-specific-quadrants">Cluster-Specific Quadrants<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-specific-quadrants"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Cluster A — KU33 (seizure transparency)</strong></p>
 
 
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-specific-quadrants">Cluster-Specific Quadrants<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Entry</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>EU compliance trajectory (EAA 2025)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>1.2m Swedes with disabilities gain enforceable rights</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>18-month compliance gap vs. 28 Jun 2025 EAA deadline</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Constitutional anchor for future accessibility legislation</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Normalises grundlag-as-legislative-tool pattern</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence">Cross-Reference to Stakeholder Influence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence">Cross-Reference to Stakeholder Influence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT entries mapped to influence network in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §Influence Network. Key coupling:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>W1 × Opposition bloc</strong> (S, V, MP) — KU33 civil-liberties critique is the structural opposition leverage</li>
@@ -2237,13 +2237,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence">Cross-Reference to Stakehol
 <li><strong>T2 × SD Åkesson</strong> — SD cost posture is the Ukraine-package single point of failure</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>THR-ID</strong>: THR-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: Attack Tree, Diamond Model, STRIDE pass, MITRE-TTP)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[Threat Sources] --> B[Institutional Threats]
     A --> C[Political Threats]
@@ -2269,8 +2269,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style D fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style E fill:#ffbb00,color:#000
     style C fill:#ffdd44,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-6-category-threat-analysis">6-Category Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-category-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats">1. Constitutional-Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-category-threat-analysis">6-Category Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-category-threat-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats">1. Constitutional-Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>KU33 — Offentlighetsprincipen Narrowing Pattern</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: HIGH | <em>Confidence</em>: HIGH | <em>Attribution</em>: Government (Kristersson/KU majority)</p>
 <p>The KU33 betänkande proposes to remove seized digital materials from "allmän handling" status. While the stated rationale is protecting ongoing criminal investigations, the structural effect is to exempt an entire category of government-held information from the public record. This is the second grundlag carve-out in the 2025/26 riksmöte (KU32 being the first, though KU32 expands media accessibility obligations — a different vector).</p>
@@ -2283,18 +2283,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats">1. Constitutional-Institution
 <li><em>Installation</em>: TF amendment takes effect January 2027</li>
 <li><em>Persistence</em>: Future governments cannot restore without new grundlag process (2+ years)</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-2-political-threats">2. Political Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-political-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-political-threats">2. Political Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-political-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>SD Cooperation Fracture Risk</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: HIGH | <em>Confidence</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: Sweden Democrats (Jimmy Åkesson)</p>
 <p>SD's support for Ukraine propositions (HD03231, HD03232) is not guaranteed. SD base voters are less enthusiastic about open-ended international financial commitments. Party leadership has been careful to frame support in national interest terms (NATO Article 5 parallel), but if cost projections for the Compensation Commission escalate, SD may signal opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: SD Deputy PM (none — SD not in government) but Tidö Agreement requires SD to "not block" certain proposals. Ukraine propositions are UU-committee matters; SD's UFöU contribution to HD01UFöU3 (NATO Finland) suggests acceptance of defence commitments but stopping short of financial pledges.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-legal-threats">3. Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-legal-threats">3. Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legal-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>ECHR Article 10 — Freedom of Expression Challenge</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Confidence</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: Journalists unions, NGOs</p>
 <p>The removal of seized materials from allmän handling status weakens press access to law enforcement materials. Investigative journalists who rely on offentlighetsprincipen to access court seizure inventories would lose this tool. A challenge under ECHR Article 10 (freedom of expression) or Article 6 (fair trial — public access) is plausible.</p>
 <p><strong>EU Directive Compliance Risk</strong>:<br>
 KU32 (media accessibility) is driven by EU's Accessibility Act and European Electronic Communications Code. Any failure to correctly transpose could trigger EU infringement proceedings.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-international-threats">4. International Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-international-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-international-threats">4. International Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-international-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Russia Hybrid Interference in Ukraine Accountability Process</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: HIGH | <em>Confidence</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: Russian government, proxies</p>
 <p>As Sweden formally accedes to both the Special Tribunal (HD03231) and Compensation Commission (HD03232), it becomes a target for Russian information operations designed to delegitimize these institutions. The King's visit to Kyiv (2026-04-17) provides symbolic ammunition for Russian narratives about Swedish "regime change" pressure.</p>
@@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-international-threats">4. International Threats<a class="" aria-hid
 <li>T1583.002 — DNS Server: Information manipulation targeting Swedish media covering Ukraine tribunal</li>
 <li>T1566 — Phishing: Target Swedish Foreign Ministry officials working on tribunal accession</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-democratic-norm-threats">5. Democratic Norm Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-democratic-norm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-democratic-norm-threats">5. Democratic Norm Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-democratic-norm-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Offentlighetsprincipen Erosion Pattern</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: CRITICAL | <em>Confidence</em>: HIGH | <em>Attribution</em>: Systemic — not attributed to single actor</p>
 <p>The combination of KU32 and KU33 in the same riksmöte represents a pattern of incremental grundlag modification. Each individual change may be justified; the cumulative effect is a narrowing of constitutional freedoms of information. From a democratic norm perspective, the most significant threat is normalizing the grundlag amendment process as a tool for routine policy adjustments.</p>
@@ -2350,13 +2350,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-democratic-norm-threats">5. Democratic Norm Threats<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Current Status</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 chamber vote</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Minority opposition fails → amendment passes</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>Election outcome</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Opposition bloc wins → KU33 risks rejection</td><td>Voters</td><td>2026-09</td></tr><tr><td>Second KU33 reading</td><td>January 2027</td><td>Requires same wording post-election</td><td>New Riksdag</td><td>2027-01</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR timeline</td><td>Not yet filed</td><td>Filing → formal ECHR review</td><td>Journalists union</td><td>TBD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-6-economic-threats">6. Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-economic-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-economic-threats">6. Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-economic-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Ukraine Compensation Commission Financial Exposure</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Confidence</em>: LOW-MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: International fiscal commitments</p>
 <p>HD03232 commits Sweden to the Convention establishing the International Compensation Commission for Ukraine. The Commission's operating model and Swedish contribution level are not yet specified in the proposition. If Sweden's contribution is proportional to GDP (as is common in international treaty financing), the annual cost could reach SEK 500m-2bn — material against the backdrop of the Spring Supplementary Budget (HD0399) showing tight fiscal space.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward Scenario</strong>: The Compensation Commission begins operations 2026-2027. Russia refuses to participate. The Commission pursues Russian frozen assets held in European jurisdictions. Sweden as a member state of the treaty has obligations to support enforcement — potentially creating tensions with trade and financial sector.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain">🌲 Attack Tree — KU33 Transparency Degradation Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain">🌲 Attack Tree — KU33 Transparency Degradation Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[ATTACK GOAL:&#x3C;br/>Permanently narrow offentlighetsprincipen&#x3C;br/>via grundlag]
     ROOT --> A1[Step 1: Frame as&#x3C;br/>proportionate reform]
@@ -2390,7 +2390,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain">🌲 Attack Tree 
 <li>A4 — mobilise press-freedom as electoral issue</li>
 <li>A5 — negotiate modified text post-election (Scenario C pathway)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Interference Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Interference Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231">💎 Dia
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Vertex</th><th>Content</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Adversary</strong></td><td>Russian state + affiliated proxies (GRU Unit 29155, FSB CIO, RT/Sputnik, commercial IO vendors)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Infrastructure</strong></td><td>Baltic-proximate server farms; coordinated inauthentic accounts on X/Telegram/VK; cryptocurrency-funded ad buys</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Capability</strong></td><td>T1583 (Acquire Infrastructure), T1566 (Phishing), T1071 (Application Layer C2), T1491 (Defacement), T1588 (Obtain Capabilities), T1498 (Network Denial of Service)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Victim</strong></td><td>Swedish MFA / UD personnel working on HD03231 · Riksdag infrastructure (riksdagen.se chamber-vote endpoints) · Swedish-language public-discourse space on HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socio-political meta</strong></td><td>Weaponising the KU33-vs-Ukraine "hypocrisy" framing; amplifying SD cost objections; targeting Magdalena Andersson posture ambiguity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Technology meta</strong></td><td>AI-generated deepfake content capacity rising; LLM-driven content farms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Event pivot</strong></td><td>2026-04-22 first-reading vote; Q2 2026 chamber vote on HD03231</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface">🔐 STRIDE Pass — Sweden's Ukraine-Tribunal Engagement Surface<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface">🔐 STRIDE Pass — Sweden's Ukraine-Tribunal Engagement Surface<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2478,7 +2478,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface">🔐 STRID
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>STRIDE</th><th>Threat</th><th>Target</th><th align="center">Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Fake Swedish diplomatic cables to Kyiv during King's visit</td><td>UD comms infrastructure</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Altered riksdagen.se votum records post-chamber vote</td><td>Riksdag IT</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Non-attributable "civil-society" campaigns questioning tribunal</td><td>Swedish public sphere</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I</strong>nformation disclosure</td><td>KU33 creates info-gap; adversary exploits lack of public oversight</td><td>Offentlighetsprincipen carve-out</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td>DDoS against riksdagen.se during 2026-04-22 and HD03231 vote</td><td>Riksdag public-facing systems</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>E</strong>levation of privilege</td><td>Phishing-enabled access to UD personnel working on tribunal</td><td>UD endpoints</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context">🎯 MITRE-TTP Mapping (adapted to political-threat context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context">🎯 MITRE-TTP Mapping (adapted to political-threat context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2530,7 +2530,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context">🎯 MITRE-TT
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Technique</th><th>Expected use against SE post-HD03231</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1583.001</td><td>Acquire Infrastructure: Domains</td><td>Typosquat domains targeting UD + Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td>T1566.002</td><td>Phishing: Spearphishing Link</td><td>Target UD tribunal team</td></tr><tr><td>T1598</td><td>Phishing for Information</td><td>Harvest UD personnel credentials</td></tr><tr><td>T1588.006</td><td>Obtain Capabilities: Vulnerabilities</td><td>Pre-positioned exploit capability against Riksdag IT</td></tr><tr><td>T1498.001</td><td>Network Denial of Service: Direct</td><td>Chamber-vote-day DDoS</td></tr><tr><td>T1491.002</td><td>Defacement: External</td><td>riksdagen.se compromise attempt</td></tr><tr><td>T1583.002</td><td>Acquire Infrastructure: DNS Server</td><td>Content manipulation for Swedish-language Ukraine coverage</td></tr><tr><td>T1189</td><td>Drive-by Compromise</td><td>Target Swedish journalist community covering KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6">📊 Threat-Indicator Library (consolidated across §§ 1-6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6">📊 Threat-Indicator Library (consolidated across §§ 1-6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2616,14 +2616,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6">📊 Threat-Indic
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Status</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Deadline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 chamber vote</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Ja-vote minority fails → amendment passes</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>KU32 chamber vote</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Same window</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td>Pending</td><td>Language on "formellt tillförd"</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 UU referral</td><td>Expected late April</td><td>Committee chair appointment</td><td>UU</td><td>≤ 2026-05-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 UU referral</td><td>Expected late April</td><td>SD cost reservation filing</td><td>UU</td><td>≤ 2026-05-15</td></tr><tr><td>Election outcome</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Opposition bloc wins → KU33 risks rejection</td><td>Voters</td><td>2026-09</td></tr><tr><td>Second KU33 reading</td><td>January 2027</td><td>Requires same wording post-election</td><td>New Riksdag</td><td>2027-01</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR timeline</td><td>Not yet filed</td><td>Filing → formal ECHR review</td><td>Journalists union</td><td>TBD</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO threat-level bulletins</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Any public adjustment mentioning tribunal</td><td>SÄPO</td><td>Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>SOM poll Tidö bloc</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Bloc &#x3C; 44% or > 50% triggers Bayesian update</td><td>SOM Institute</td><td>Monthly</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU32<br>
 <strong>Depth Tier</strong>: L2+ (P0 Constitutional)<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17<br>
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identity">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2666,17 +2666,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-identity">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Betänkande (committee report)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Beteckning</strong></td><td>2025/26:KU32</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional texts</strong></td><td>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) + Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>First reading</strong></td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22 chamber debate (same day as KU33)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Effect date</strong></td><td>1 January 2027 (if confirmed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU driver</strong></td><td>European Accessibility Act (Directive 2019/882) + EECC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>KU32 amends both TF and YGL to allow broader accessibility requirements to be imposed by ordinary law on constitutionally protected media products. Currently, TF and YGL shield products like e-books, streaming services, and digital publications from certain requirements — including accessibility mandates — because imposing such requirements would require constitutional authority. KU32 creates that constitutional authority, enabling Sweden to fully comply with the EU's Accessibility Act.</p>
 <p>This is a less controversial constitutional amendment than KU33 — it expands the ability to impose accessibility standards on media rather than restricting public access rights. However, the simultaneous passage of KU32 and KU33 in the same riksmöte establishes a pattern of constitutional amendment as routine legislative tool that warrants monitoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-policy-changes">Key Policy Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-policy-changes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-policy-changes">Key Policy Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-policy-changes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>E-books and digital content</strong>: Accessibility requirements (screen reader compatibility, alt text, captioning) can now be mandated by ordinary law for TF/YGL-protected digital content</li>
 <li><strong>E-commerce services</strong>: Accessibility standards for digital shopping platforms with media components</li>
 <li><strong>Vidaresändning</strong> (must-carry broadcasting): Accessibility services (subtitling, audio description) must be carried beyond just public service broadcasters</li>
 <li><strong>Advertising and product information</strong>: Packaging information requirements can be expanded under ordinary law</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific">SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific">SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific">SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SWOT</th><th>Entry</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>EU compliance — avoids infringement proceedings</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Enables meaningful accessibility for disabled persons</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Constitutional modification for EU compliance sets precedent</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Digital inclusion for 1.2m Swedes with disabilities</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Media industry compliance costs</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Two grundlag amendments in one riksmöte — normalizes process</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors">Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors">Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2750,7 +2750,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors">Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Stance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ann-Sofie Alm</td><td>KU chair (M)</td><td>PROPOSE adoption</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>External driver</td><td>Accessibility Act compliance</td></tr><tr><td>Funktionstillgänglighet</td><td>Disability organizations</td><td>SUPPORT</td></tr><tr><td>Media sector (TV4, SVT)</td><td>Compliance obligation</td><td>NEUTRAL/CONCERNED about costs</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2778,14 +2778,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Chamber vote KU32</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Simultaneous with KU33</td></tr><tr><td>Second reading</td><td>Post-election 2027</td><td>Same timeline as KU33</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation regulation</td><td>2026 H2</td><td>Ordinary law requirements under new constitutional authority</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU33<br>
 <strong>Depth Tier</strong>: L3 (P0 Constitutional)<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17<br>
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched — full L3 content)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identity-1">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-1">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2840,21 +2840,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-identity-1">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Betänkande (committee report)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Beteckning</strong></td><td>2025/26:KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Underlying prop</strong></td><td>Government proposition (KU recommends adoption)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>First reading</strong></td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22 chamber debate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Second reading</strong></td><td>Required after September 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Effect date</strong></td><td>1 January 2027 (if confirmed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional text</strong></td><td>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) — fundamental law</td></tr><tr><td><strong>URL</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33.html</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-two-paragraph-significance">Two-Paragraph Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-paragraph-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-two-paragraph-significance">Two-Paragraph Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-paragraph-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>KU33 proposes a targeted but constitutionally significant amendment to Sweden's Tryckfrihetsförordningen: digital materials seized or copied during police raids — husrannsakan — would no longer automatically qualify as "allmänna handlingar" (public documents). The current rule means that once material enters a government authority's possession, it presumptively becomes public. KU33 creates an exception for law enforcement seizure contexts, preventing journalists and citizens from requesting access to seized materials during active investigations.</p>
 <p>The democratic significance exceeds the narrow legal description. Offentlighetsprincipen — Sweden's 250-year-old public access framework — has been eroded incrementally over recent decades, with each exception justified as proportionate and limited. KU33's carve-out follows the same logic. But constitutional changes of this kind require two riksdag votes separated by an election, precisely because the founders understood that no single legislative majority should be able to permanently narrow fundamental freedoms. The real question is whether the post-September 2026 riksdag will confirm what the current one initiates.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-analysis">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-historical-context">Lens 1: Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-historical-context"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-analysis">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-historical-context">Lens 1: Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-historical-context"></a></h4>
 <p>Offentlighetsprincipen dates to the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766 — the world's first. Sweden pioneered public access to government records as a constitutional right. Each amendment to TF carries symbolic weight far exceeding its technical scope. KU33 is the 27th or 28th amendment to TF since it was incorporated into the constitutional framework; however, most prior amendments expanded rights (EU compliance, digital formats). This amendment restricts.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact">Lens 2: Legal-Constitutional Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact">Lens 2: Legal-Constitutional Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>The amendment removes seized digital materials from the definition of "allmän handling" during: (a) law enforcement investigations, (b) upon transfer of information-bearing devices to authorities, and (c) when an authority takes over custody of seized copying-derived data. The carve-out ends when material is "tillförd en utredning" (incorporated into a formal investigation file) — at that point, normal public access rules resume. Critics note that defining when material is "incorporated" into an investigation file is discretionary, creating enforcement ambiguity.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>For the Kristersson government, KU33 advances the law enforcement agenda consistent with HD03246 (juvenile justice), HD03233 (telecoms fraud), and HD01SfU22 (immigration enforcement). The government is constructing a comprehensive crime-fighting narrative ahead of September 2026 elections. Restricting seizure transparency is framed as protecting ongoing investigations, not restricting press.</p>
 <p>For the opposition, KU33 creates a civil liberties argument without risking the nuclear option of blocking Ukraine propositions. S can oppose KU33 while supporting Ukraine — this is a useful positioning move for Magdalena Andersson ahead of the election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Press Freedom Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Press Freedom Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>The Swedish Union of Journalists (SJF) and major media organizations will oppose KU33. Investigative journalism in Sweden regularly uses offentlighetsprincipen to access police seizure inventories — for example, in reporting on organized crime asset seizures, corruption investigations, and environmental violations. The exemption removes this tool for the critical period when seized information is most newsworthy.</p>
 <p><strong>Named actors at risk</strong>: TT (Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå), DN investigations unit, SVT Granskar, SR Ekot investigative journalists all use seizure-related public record requests.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-election-implications">Lens 5: Election Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-election-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-election-implications">Lens 5: Election Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-election-implications"></a></h4>
 <p>KU33's fate hinges on the September 2026 election. Current polling (Tidö coalition ≈ 48%) suggests the coalition could lose its working majority. If S+V+MP+MP elect a new government, they could reject the second reading — but only if they have the will to do so. S has historically been cautious about being seen as opposing law enforcement. V and MP would push for rejection.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral risk matrix</strong>:</p>
 
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-election-implications">Lens 5: Election Implications<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Probability</th><th>KU33 outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition wins majority</td><td>35%</td><td>Confirmed — TF amended Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td>S leads minority government</td><td>40%</td><td>S negotiates — likely confirms with modifications</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP majority</td><td>25%</td><td>Likely rejected — second reading fails</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking"></a></h4>
 <p>How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?</p>
 
 
@@ -2926,7 +2926,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking">Lens 6: International Benchmarking
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Approach</th><th>Comparison</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Investigative secrets protected under §406e StPO; no constitutional right to access</td><td>More restrictive than Swedish baseline; KU33 moves Sweden toward German model</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Forvaltningsloven § 24 allows exemption for investigations</td><td>Similar trajectory; DK has had this exemption for decades</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>JulkL 24 § excludes investigation materials — permanent exemption</td><td>Finland has always been more restrictive; Sweden moving in Finnish direction</td></tr><tr><td>UK</td><td>FOIA 2000 s.30 exempts investigations</td><td>Long-established exemption; UK model justifies Swedish direction</td></tr><tr><td>Canada</td><td>Privacy Act exempts police investigations</td><td>Similar to proposed Swedish position</td></tr><tr><td>Council of Europe</td><td>ECHR Art 10 requires proportionality test</td><td>KU33 must pass proportionality — Sweden's legal advisors will need to defend</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-table-ku33-specific">SWOT Table (KU33-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table-ku33-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-table-ku33-specific">SWOT Table (KU33-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table-ku33-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2975,7 +2975,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-table-ku33-specific">SWOT Table (KU33-specific)<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SWOT</th><th>Entry</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>Protects active investigations from interference</td><td>Law enforcement need to complete investigations without evidence being signalled via public access</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Narrows 250-year constitutional freedom</td><td>TF has stood since 1766; this removes a category of access rights</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Creates discretionary "incorporation" determination</td><td>When material is "incorporated into investigation" is undefined and discretionary</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Models successful approach used by Germany, UK, Finland</td><td>International precedent supports proportionate exemption</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>ECHR Article 10 challenge</td><td>Journalists union likely to pursue European Court route</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Election-dependent: uncertain second reading</td><td>If S+V+MP win September 2026, second reading may fail</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actor-table">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actor-table">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3042,7 +3042,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actor-table">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Institution</th><th>Stance</th><th>Influence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ulf Kristersson</td><td>PM (M)</td><td>Proposer</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer</td><td>Justice Minister (M)</td><td>Strong advocate</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Andreas Norlén</td><td>Speaker/former KU</td><td>Overseer</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Erik Nymansson</td><td>Chefsjustitieombudsman</td><td>Implementing authority</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>SJF (Journalist Union)</td><td>Civil society</td><td>STRONGLY OPPOSE</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>TT</td><td>News agency</td><td>OPPOSE</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Magdalena Andersson</td><td>S party leader</td><td>LIKELY OPPOSE (election calculation)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Jonas Sjöstedt-era V</td><td>Vänsterpartiet</td><td>STRONGLY OPPOSE</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Ann-Sofie Alm</td><td>KU chair (M)</td><td>PROPOSE adoption</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-library">Indicator Library<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-library"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-library">Indicator Library<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-library"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3098,19 +3098,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-library">Indicator Library<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Status</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Deadline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Chamber vote KU33</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Vote outcome → adoption as vilande</td><td>KU/kammarkansliet</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet opinion</td><td>Published</td><td>Proportionality determination</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>SJF public statement</td><td>Expected</td><td>Press freedom lobbying begins</td><td>SJF</td><td>Post-debate</td></tr><tr><td>Election result</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Determines second reading outcome</td><td>Voters</td><td>2026-09</td></tr><tr><td>Second reading vote</td><td>January 2027</td><td>Final constitutional decision</td><td>New riksdag</td><td>2027-01</td></tr><tr><td>TF amendment gazette</td><td>Jan 2027 if confirmed</td><td>SFS publication</td><td>Riksdag</td><td>2027-01-01</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-critique">Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-critique">Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Steelman for KU33</em>: The argument that ongoing criminal investigations require protection from evidence-alerting via FOIA-style requests is well-established in virtually every comparable democracy. A criminal suspect whose assets are being seized should not be able to use offentlighetsprincipen to learn what the police have taken before the investigation is complete. The amendment is carefully scoped — material reverts to public access once incorporated into the investigation file.</p>
 <p><em>Counter to steelman</em>: The existing law already has exceptions for ongoing investigations (sekretesslagen § 18 chap). KU33 adds a constitutional (not statutory) exemption, which is harder to reverse and broader in principle. The additional layer of constitutional protection is not needed to achieve the stated law enforcement goal — a statutory amendment would suffice and would be easier to calibrate and reverse.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: The law enforcement rationale is legitimate, but the constitutional (rather than statutory) implementation is disproportionate and sets a dangerous precedent for grundlag modification as a routine policy tool.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231-hd03232-ukraine">HD03231-HD03232-ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231-hd03232-ukraine"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_ids</strong>: HD03231, HD03232<br>
 <strong>Depth Tier</strong>: L2+ (P1 Critical — International Treaty)<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-16<br>
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Utrikesdepartementet<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identity-2">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-2">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3157,30 +3157,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-identity-2">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>HD03231</th><th>HD03232</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till konventionen om inrättande av en internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (prop 2025/26:231)</td><td>Proposition (prop 2025/26:232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee referral</strong></td><td>UU (Utrikesutskottet)</td><td>UU (Utrikesutskottet)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Signatory PM</strong></td><td>Ulf Kristersson</td><td>Ulf Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Signatory FM</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag URL</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231</a></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Diplomatic context</strong></td><td>King Carl Gustaf + FM visited Ukraine 2026-04-17</td><td>Same diplomatic mission</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-combined-significance-paragraph">Combined Significance Paragraph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-combined-significance-paragraph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-combined-significance-paragraph">Combined Significance Paragraph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-combined-significance-paragraph"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden is simultaneously acceding to two international legal instruments creating unprecedented accountability mechanisms for the Russia-Ukraine war. HD03231 joins Sweden to the "Expanded Partial Agreement" establishing the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine — designed to prosecute the political and military leaders responsible for Russia's February 2022 full-scale invasion, whom the International Criminal Court cannot reach because Russia is not an ICC member for this purpose. HD03232 accedes to the Convention establishing an International Compensation Commission for Ukraine, designed to ensure victims of Russian aggression receive reparations from Russian frozen assets held in European jurisdictions.</p>
 <p>Combined, these two propositions represent Sweden's most significant contribution to the international rule-of-law response to the Ukraine war since Sweden's NATO accession in 2024. The timing — submitted to Riksdag on April 16 and published the same day as the King of Sweden and FM Malmer Stenergard's visit to Kyiv — was deliberate diplomatic signalling.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-analysis-1">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-international-law-significance">Lens 1: International Law Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-international-law-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-analysis-1">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-international-law-significance">Lens 1: International Law Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-international-law-significance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)</strong>:<br>
 The crime of aggression — the "supreme international crime" in the words of the Nuremberg Tribunal — has historically been the hardest to prosecute. The ICC Kampala Amendment (2010) gave the ICC jurisdiction over aggression, but Russia is not a member, and the ICC cannot exercise jurisdiction over nationals of non-member states for this crime. The Special Tribunal closes this gap with a hybrid international-national mechanism. Sweden's accession joins approximately 40 states (as of April 2026) supporting the tribunal.</p>
 <p><strong>Compensation Commission (HD03232)</strong>:<br>
 The Convention on the International Register of Damage and the Compensation Commission represents the financial accountability dimension. Approximately €260bn in Russian sovereign assets are held frozen in European financial institutions (primarily Euroclear in Belgium). The Commission's mandate is to create a legal pathway for using these assets to compensate Ukrainian victims. Swedish accession strengthens the international legal basis for this asset mobilization.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context">Lens 2: Diplomatic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context">Lens 2: Diplomatic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context"></a></h4>
 <p>The timing of the propositions (April 16) and the King's Kyiv visit (April 17) is explicitly coordinated. H.M. King Carl Gustaf's presence in Kyiv alongside FM Malmer Stenergard sends the strongest possible diplomatic signal: Sweden's head of state endorses the accountability framework being submitted to the Riksdag.</p>
 <p>This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign policy statement through a diplomatic visit — previous precedent was Carl Gustaf's Washington visit during Sweden's NATO accession process. The royal dimension elevates both propositions to a level of national commitment that transcends partisan politics.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>For the Kristersson government</strong>: This is a legacy achievement. PM Kristersson has consistently positioned Sweden as a strong Ukraine ally; these propositions deliver concrete legal instruments beyond military aid. They also give the government a strong foreign policy argument heading into the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>For SD</strong>: Sweden Democrats have generally supported Ukraine aid but remain watchful about cost. The Compensation Commission (HD03232) has uncertain Swedish financial obligations. SD's cooperation in UU committee will be crucial. Jimmy Åkesson has publicly supported Ukraine's sovereignty but consistently sought to limit open-ended financial exposure.</p>
 <p><strong>For the opposition</strong>: S, V, C, L all strongly support Ukraine accountability. V's historic opposition to NATO has been paused in the context of Ukraine solidarity. MP supports both propositions. This creates a rare all-party moment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics">Lens 4: Coalition and Stakeholder Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics">Lens 4: Coalition and Stakeholder Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>UU committee composition</strong>: UU will handle both propositions. The committee is chaired by a government-aligned member. Cross-party support is expected to be broad. Watch for SD reservations specifically on HD03232 cost dimensions.</p>
 <p><strong>NGO support</strong>: Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, FIDH, and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court all support both instruments. Their domestic Swedish advocacy will reinforce the broad coalition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations">Lens 5: Economic &#x26; Fiscal Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations">Lens 5: Economic &#x26; Fiscal Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>HD03232 financial implications</strong>: The Compensation Commission needs operating budget and Swedish contribution. EU member states' contributions are typically GDP-proportional. Sweden's GDP is approximately SEK 7.5 trillion; if Swedish contribution is 2-3% of Commission operating costs, annual exposure could be SEK 50-200m for administration — manageable. The larger question is potential Swedish liability if Russian assets in Swedish jurisdiction are mobilized for compensation payments.</p>
 <p><strong>Frozen assets in Sweden</strong>: Riksbanken and Swedish commercial banks hold some Russian sovereign assets, though the major Euroclear positions are Belgian. Sweden would need to adapt domestic legislation (separate from these propositions) to enable asset mobilization.</p>
 <p><strong>GDP context</strong>: Sweden's 0.82% growth in 2024 (recovering from -0.20% in 2023) and falling inflation (2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023) provide a stable but not abundant fiscal backdrop. Finance Minister Svantesson has room for Ukraine commitments but not unlimited room.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3247,7 +3247,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1">Lens 6: International Benchmarki
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Tribunal</th><th>Compensation Commission</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>EU leader in both instruments</td></tr><tr><td>France</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Strong support, Macron initiative</td></tr><tr><td>UK</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Post-Brexit still engaged</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Nordic solidarity</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>NATO partner, strong Ukraine support</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Nordic pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Host of ICC; natural jurisdiction</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>Acceding</td><td>Acceding</td><td>HD03231/HD03232 completing accession</td></tr><tr><td>USA</td><td>Observer</td><td>Non-member</td><td>Biden admin supported; Trump posture unclear</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-table">SWOT Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-table">SWOT Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3308,7 +3308,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-table">SWOT Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SWOT</th><th>Entry</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>Cross-party political consensus</td><td>All 8 parties support Ukraine; V/MP despite historic NATO skepticism</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Royal diplomatic reinforcement</td><td>King Carl Gustaf's Kyiv visit elevates commitment</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>SD cost resistance</td><td>SD base skeptical of open-ended financial obligations</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Financial exposure uncertain</td><td>HD03232 contribution calculation not yet specified</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>EU rule-of-law leadership</td><td>Sweden positions as norm-entrepreneur alongside Germany, France</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Russian asset mobilization legal foundation</td><td>HD03232 creates legal basis for compensation payments</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Russian information operations</td><td>Sweden becomes target for hybrid interference</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Geopolitical reversal risk</td><td>If US-Russia settlement bypasses tribunal framework</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actor-table-1">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actor-table-1">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3376,7 +3376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actor-table-1">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Stance</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>FM (M), proposition signer</td><td>CHAMPION</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Ulf Kristersson</td><td>PM (M), proposition signer</td><td>STRONG SUPPORT</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>King Carl Gustaf</td><td>Swedish head of state</td><td>Diplomatic signal via Kyiv visit</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Jimmy Åkesson</td><td>SD party leader</td><td>Cautious support, watching costs</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Magdalena Andersson</td><td>S party leader</td><td>STRONG SUPPORT</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Nooshi Dadgostar</td><td>V party leader</td><td>SUPPORT</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Per Bolund</td><td>MP party leader</td><td>STRONG SUPPORT</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Andreas Norlén</td><td>Riksdag Speaker</td><td>Process facilitator</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>UU Committee Chair</td><td>Committee processing</td><td>SUPPORTIVE</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CMP-ID</strong>: CMP-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
@@ -3384,7 +3384,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Benchmarks KU33 (seizure transparency), KU32 (accessibility), and HD03231 + HD03232 (Ukraine accountability) against ≥ 5 comparator jurisdictions per cluster
 <strong>Data sources</strong>: Council of Europe (Venice Commission, ECHR), RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025, OECD Open Government Index, Euroclear public disclosures, Eurostat, World Bank, national statutes</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--jurisdiction-panel">🌍 Jurisdiction Panel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--jurisdiction-panel"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-jurisdiction-panel">🌍 Jurisdiction Panel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-panel"></a></h3>
 <p>The panel is constructed per cluster:</p>
 
 
@@ -3413,8 +3413,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--jurisdiction-panel">🌍 Jurisdiction Panel<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Jurisdiction Panel</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>KU33</strong> (seizure transparency)</td><td>🇩🇪 DE · 🇫🇮 FI · 🇩🇰 DK · 🇳🇴 NO · 🇬🇧 UK · 🇳🇱 NL · 🇨🇦 CA · CoE / ECHR</td><td>Nordic baseline + Germanic civil-law + Anglo FOIA + CoE oversight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU32</strong> (accessibility)</td><td>🇪🇺 EU (Directive 2019/882) · 🇩🇪 DE · 🇫🇷 FR · 🇮🇪 IE · 🇩🇰 DK · 🇫🇮 FI · 🇺🇸 US (ADA Title III)</td><td>EU baseline + national transpositions + US extraterritorial reference</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231/232</strong> (Ukraine tribunal + compensation)</td><td>🇳🇱 NL · 🇩🇪 DE · 🇫🇷 FR · 🇬🇧 UK · 🇳🇴 NO · 🇫🇮 FI · 🇩🇰 DK · 🇵🇱 PL · 🇺🇸 US · CoE</td><td>ICC host + G7/EU core + Nordic cluster + front-line Ukraine neighbour</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen">🏛️ Cluster 1 — KU33: Seizure Transparency &#x26; Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen">🏛️ Cluster 1 — KU33: Seizure Transparency &#x26; Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3509,7 +3509,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Legal regime</th><th align="center">Presumption of access to seized digital material</th><th>Exemption mechanism</th><th>When exemption ends</th><th>Sweden relative posture</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SE — Sweden (current)</strong></td><td>TF 1766 + OSL 2009:400 + RB 27 kap.</td><td align="center">Presumption of public access; sekretesslagen §18 kap. allows temporary exemption</td><td>Statutory secrecy (sekretess) during active investigation</td><td>Case closed or material filed</td><td>Baseline (pre-KU33)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SE — Sweden (KU33 if confirmed)</strong></td><td>TF amended</td><td align="center"><strong>No presumption</strong> until "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>"</td><td><strong>Constitutional</strong> carve-out</td><td>Formal incorporation into investigation file</td><td>Proposed shift toward DE/FI model</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE — Germany</strong></td><td>StPO §406e · IFG 2005</td><td align="center">No presumption; investigation files secret by default</td><td>StGB §353b; StPO §406e only grants <em>Akteneinsicht</em> to parties</td><td>When investigation closes and file is released</td><td>More restrictive than Swedish baseline; KU33 moves Sweden toward German model</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI — Finland</strong></td><td>Julkisuuslaki 621/1999 §24 + Förundersökningslagen</td><td align="center">Permanent exemption for ongoing investigation materials</td><td>§24 permanent (not time-limited)</td><td>Case closed, with balancing</td><td>Finland stricter than Sweden — Sweden converging on Finnish baseline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 DK — Denmark</strong></td><td>Offentlighedsloven 2013 §27 + Retsplejeloven</td><td align="center">No presumption during investigation</td><td>§27 categorical investigation exemption</td><td>Case closed</td><td>Similar to post-KU33 Swedish posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 NO — Norway</strong></td><td>Offentlighetsloven 2006 §24</td><td align="center">Conditional presumption; §24 blanket exemption for investigation materials</td><td>§24 investigation-material carve-out</td><td>Case closure + review</td><td>Norway has had KU33-equivalent since 2006</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇬🇧 UK — United Kingdom</strong></td><td>FOIA 2000 s.30 + PACE 1984</td><td align="center">No presumption; s.30 exempts information relating to investigations</td><td>Categorical investigation exemption</td><td>Not time-limited; balance-of-public-interest test</td><td>Long-established exemption; UK posture validates Swedish direction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 NL — Netherlands</strong></td><td>Wet open overheid 2022 + Wetboek van Strafvordering</td><td align="center">Conditional presumption with broad investigation carve-out</td><td>§5.1 investigation exemption</td><td>Investigation closed</td><td>Similar to UK/DK; Swedish KU33 aligns with NL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇨🇦 CA — Canada</strong></td><td>Privacy Act s.22 + Access to Information Act</td><td align="center">Categorical exemption for law-enforcement investigations</td><td>Investigation exemption s.22(1)(b)</td><td>Investigation ended or 20 years</td><td>Common-law default; SE/KU33 converges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🌍 CoE / ECHR</strong></td><td>ECHR Art 10 · Art 6 · Art 8</td><td align="center">Proportionality test required for any press-freedom restriction</td><td><em>Bladet Tromsø v Norway</em> · <em>Sürek v Turkey</em> line</td><td>Case-by-case</td><td><strong>Sweden KU33 must survive Art 10 proportionality review — Venice Commission likely to opine</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3532,7 +3532,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges">Where Sweden <strong>innovat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stance</th><th>Detail</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>By adopting a seizure-material carve-out, Sweden aligns with DE/FI/DK/NO/UK/CA — the restrictive-default Nordic and Germanic pattern.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Diverges</strong></td><td>Sweden is the only state implementing the carve-out via <strong>constitutional amendment</strong> (grundlag), not statutory. DE/FI/DK/NO/UK all use ordinary law. This makes Sweden's reform <strong>harder to reverse</strong> and sets a precedent for grundlag as a routine legislative tool. <code>[HIGH confidence]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Innovates</strong> (negative connotation)</td><td>The "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" trigger is <strong>novel</strong> in European practice — comparator jurisdictions use categorical investigation-closed triggers. The interpretive ambiguity is unique to the Swedish proposal.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-scoring-context">Press-freedom scoring context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-scoring-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-scoring-context">Press-freedom scoring context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-scoring-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3586,8 +3586,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-press-freedom-scoring-context">Press-freedom scoring context<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th align="center">RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025</th><th align="center">Trend</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇳🇴 NO</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 DK</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇸🇪 SE (current)</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 FI</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 NL</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">↗</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 DE</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">↘</td></tr><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK</td><td align="center">23</td><td align="center">↘</td></tr><tr><td>🇨🇦 CA</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">↘</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: Sweden currently holds #3 globally. Constitutional narrowing at this altitude is visible internationally; any ECHR challenge from SJF/TU/Utgivarna/RSF-SE will be high-profile.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment">🎛️ Cluster 2 — KU32: Accessibility (TF + YGL Amendment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark-1">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment">🎛️ Cluster 2 — KU32: Accessibility (TF + YGL Amendment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark-1">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3657,7 +3657,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark-1">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Transposition instrument</th><th>Constitutional obstacle</th><th align="center">Deadline compliance (EU Directive 2019/882 — 28 Jun 2025)</th><th align="center">Digital-disability population</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 SE</strong></td><td><strong>KU32 + ordinary-law framework</strong></td><td>TF + YGL shielded media products from accessibility obligations</td><td align="center"><strong>Non-compliant until KU32 effect date 2027-01-01</strong> (9-month overrun)</td><td align="center">~1.2m Swedes with disabilities</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇪🇺 EU</strong></td><td>Directive (EU) 2019/882 (EAA)</td><td>n/a (directive sets minimum)</td><td align="center">2025-06-28 deadline</td><td align="center">~87m Europeans</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE</strong></td><td>Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz (BFSG) 2021</td><td>No constitutional obstacle; ordinary law sufficient</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~7.8m</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 FR</strong></td><td>Décret n° 2023-778 + L. 2005-102 amendments</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~12m</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇮🇪 IE</strong></td><td>European Union (Accessibility Requirements) Regs 2023</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~640 000</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 DK</strong></td><td>Tilgængelighedsloven 2025</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~700 000</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI</strong></td><td>Laki digitaalisten palvelujen tarjoamisesta (transposed)</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~1m</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇺🇸 US</strong></td><td>ADA Title III + Section 508</td><td>No constitutional obstacle (Title III pre-dates internet)</td><td align="center">Independent regime; precedent for 21st-century enforcement</td><td align="center">~61m</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3681,8 +3681,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1">Where Sweden <strong>innov
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stance</th><th>Detail</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Diverges (negatively)</strong></td><td>Sweden is the <strong>only EU member state</strong> that needed a constitutional amendment to transpose EAA — a consequence of the constitutional protection of media products under TF/YGL. This is a unique civil-law artefact. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>Once KU32 takes effect in January 2027, Sweden aligns with the rest of EU-27. The 18-month compliance gap (2025-06-28 → 2027-01-01) is Commission-reportable but unlikely to trigger infringement proceedings given the good-faith constitutional-reform path. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Innovates</strong></td><td>KU32 explicitly amends both TF and YGL rather than creating an ordinary-law carve-out — giving future accessibility regulations a constitutional anchor. This is unique and potentially exported as a model for other constitutionally-protected-press jurisdictions. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package">🌐 Cluster 3 — HD03231 + HD03232: Ukraine Accountability Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231">Tabular benchmark — Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package">🌐 Cluster 3 — HD03231 + HD03232: Ukraine Accountability Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231">Tabular benchmark — Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3780,7 +3780,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231">Tabular b
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Status</th><th>Date</th><th>Contribution (if public)</th><th>Stance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 NL — Netherlands</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>Jun 2024</td><td>Tribunal seat — The Hague (likely)</td><td>Host candidate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE — Germany</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Co-leader; significant secretariat funding</td><td>Founding driver</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 FR — France</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>G7 co-signatory</td><td>Strong political support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇬🇧 UK — United Kingdom</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Core Group participant</td><td>Legal-infrastructure support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇵🇱 PL — Poland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Regional proximity</td><td>Frontline advocate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 NO — Norway</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Nordic pattern</td><td>Early supporter</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI — Finland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>NATO partner (Apr 2023)</td><td>Frontline with Russia</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 DK — Denmark</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Nordic pattern</td><td>Parliament ratified swiftly</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 SE — Sweden (HD03231)</strong></td><td><strong>Acceding</strong></td><td><strong>Apr 2026</strong></td><td>TBD — UU budget pending</td><td><strong>Cluster latecomer</strong> (NATO-accession sequencing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇺🇸 US — United States</strong></td><td>Observer</td><td>2024</td><td>Intelligence/legal cooperation</td><td>Ambiguous political posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇷🇺 RU — Russia</strong></td><td>Non-member</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Tribunal target</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🌍 CoE — Council of Europe</strong></td><td>Secretariat host</td><td>2025</td><td>Legal infrastructure</td><td>Institutional anchor</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232">Tabular benchmark — International Compensation Commission (HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232">Tabular benchmark — International Compensation Commission (HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232">Tab
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Status</th><th align="center">Ratification date</th><th>Domestic frozen-asset base</th><th align="center">Commitment to mobilise</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇧🇪 BE — Belgium</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td><strong>€191bn</strong> (Euroclear)</td><td align="center">Operationally coordinating</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE — Germany</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>€2.5bn (est.)</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 FR — France</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>€12bn (est.)</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇬🇧 UK — United Kingdom</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>~£26bn frozen</td><td align="center">Mobilisation legislation being prepared</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 NL — Netherlands</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>~€1bn (est.)</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 NO — Norway</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Limited</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI — Finland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Limited</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 SE — Sweden (HD03232)</strong></td><td><strong>Acceding</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Apr 2026</strong></td><td>Limited (Riksbanken + commercial banks)</td><td align="center"><strong>To be determined</strong> — no domestic mobilisation bill yet tabled</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇵🇱 PL — Poland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Limited</td><td align="center">Strong political commitment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇺🇸 US — United States</strong></td><td>Non-member</td><td align="center">—</td><td>~$6bn (Treasury)</td><td align="center">REPO Act enables Treasury-side mobilisation independently</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3892,7 +3892,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2">Where Sweden <strong>innov
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stance</th><th>Detail</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>Sweden is the ninth+ country joining the tribunal in the April 2026 cluster. Policy direction is entirely aligned with the G7 + Nordic + front-line-state consensus. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>Swedish contribution profile is modest (limited frozen asset base, modest GDP-proportional administrative share). Compensation Commission funding burden sits primarily with BE, UK, DE, FR. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Innovates</strong></td><td>Sweden is the <strong>only Nordic state</strong> joining tribunal and compensation commission <strong>simultaneously with a royal diplomatic visit to Kyiv</strong> — the coordination is unique. This elevates Sweden's norm-entrepreneurship signal above comparable Nordic contributions. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Diverges</strong></td><td>Sweden's accession comes <strong>~2 years after most founding members</strong> — this is a consequence of Sweden's NATO-accession sequencing (Sweden joined NATO in March 2024). Late-follower posture rather than first-mover. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat">📊 Macroeconomic Context (World Bank, OECD, Eurostat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat">📊 Macroeconomic Context (World Bank, OECD, Eurostat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat">📊 Macroeconomic C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">SE 2024</th><th align="center">SE 2023</th><th align="center">Nordic peers</th><th align="center">EU-27</th><th align="center">Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP growth (real)</td><td align="center"><strong>+0.82%</strong></td><td align="center">−0.20%</td><td align="center">NO +1.1 · DK +1.8 · FI −0.2</td><td align="center">+0.4%</td><td align="center">World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation (CPI, YoY)</td><td align="center"><strong>2.84%</strong></td><td align="center">8.55%</td><td align="center">NO 3.1 · DK 1.2 · FI 1.0</td><td align="center">2.6%</td><td align="center">World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Public debt / GDP</td><td align="center">~31%</td><td align="center">~31%</td><td align="center">NO 44 · DK 30 · FI 76</td><td align="center">~82%</td><td align="center">Eurostat</td></tr><tr><td>Defence spending / GDP</td><td align="center">~2.2%</td><td align="center">~1.8%</td><td align="center">Rising post-NATO</td><td align="center">1.9%</td><td align="center">SIPRI</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication for HD03232 affordability</strong>: Sweden's fiscal posture (~31% debt/GDP, ~2% defence) provides <strong>room for moderate Compensation-Commission administrative contribution</strong> but <strong>limited room for open-ended reparation underwriting</strong>. SD cost-resistance is thus fiscally rational, not purely political.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict">🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrated Verdict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict">🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrated Verdict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3986,7 +3986,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict">🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrate
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>SE posture 1219</th><th>Peer median</th><th align="center">Delta</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Domestic transparency (offentlighetsprincipen)</td><td>Narrowing (KU33)</td><td>Mixed</td><td align="center"><strong>↘</strong></td></tr><tr><td>EU legal-compliance posture</td><td>Catching up (KU32)</td><td>On-time 2025</td><td align="center"><strong>↘</strong></td></tr><tr><td>International accountability engagement</td><td>Advancing (HD03231/232)</td><td>Strong</td><td align="center"><strong>↗</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal commitment to Ukraine accountability</td><td>Conservative</td><td>Varied</td><td align="center"><strong>→</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Royal / head-of-state diplomatic signalling</td><td>Active (King's Kyiv visit)</td><td>Rare</td><td align="center"><strong>↑</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net</strong>: Sweden is <strong>strategically asymmetric</strong> — advancing aggressively on the international rule-of-law front while retrenching on the domestic press-freedom front. This asymmetry is the core rhetorical tension flagged in the article.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-confidence--limitations">⚠️ Confidence &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-confidence--limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--limitations">⚠️ Confidence &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03232 contribution numbers</strong> are extrapolations from GDP shares; no Commission secretariat cost model has been published — estimates carry ±100% error bar.</li>
 <li><strong>RSF index 2025 values</strong> are preliminary; final release typically September; rankings may shift ±2 positions.</li>
@@ -3996,12 +3996,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-confidence--limitations">⚠️ Confidence &#x26; Limitations<a c
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-15 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (International benchmarking — ≥ 5 jurisdictions per cluster)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CLS-ID</strong>: CLS-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-framework">Sensitivity Decision Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-framework">Sensitivity Decision Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-framework"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Document Received] --> B{Constitutional Change?}
     B -->|Yes| C[P0 - Constitutional Priority]
@@ -4020,7 +4020,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-framework">Sensitivity Decision Framework<a clas
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style G fill:#ffbb00,color:#000
     style H fill:#44aa44,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4075,7 +4075,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Priority</th><th>Classification</th><th>Retention</th><th>Offentlighetsprincipen</th><th>Reasoning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td><strong>P0 Constitutional</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>10 years</td><td>Public</td><td>Grundlag (TF) amendment; affects democratic transparency infrastructure</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td><strong>P0 Constitutional</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>10 years</td><td>Public</td><td>Grundlag (TF+YGL) amendment; EU accessibility implementation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td><strong>P1 Critical</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>7 years</td><td>Public</td><td>International treaty, Ukraine war accountability</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td><strong>P1 Critical</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>7 years</td><td>Public</td><td>International treaty, international law institution</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td><strong>P2 Sector</strong></td><td>Public — Sector Summary</td><td>5 years</td><td>Public</td><td>Property rights reform; market transparency</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-political-temperature-assessment">Political Temperature Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-temperature-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-temperature-assessment">Political Temperature Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-temperature-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4118,12 +4118,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-temperature-assessment">Political Temperature Assessment<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Temperature</th><th>Trend</th><th>Parties in conflict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33</td><td>🌡️ HIGH (7/10)</td><td>Rising</td><td>Civil liberties advocates vs. law enforcement proponents</td></tr><tr><td>KU32</td><td>🌡️ MODERATE (5/10)</td><td>Stable</td><td>Broad consensus; EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>🌡️ HIGH (8/10)</td><td>Peak</td><td>Broad cross-party support; SD cautious</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>🌡️ HIGH (7/10)</td><td>Rising</td><td>Same as HD03231</td></tr><tr><td>CU28</td><td>🌡️ LOW (3/10)</td><td>Stable</td><td>Housing industry concerns but broad agreement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU33</strong>: First-reading passage of a constitutional amendment means Sweden has made an irreversible (until next election) commitment to narrow offentlighetsprincipen for law enforcement materials. If the riksdag elected in September 2026 confirms the amendment, it takes effect January 2027 — within 9 months.</li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine Package</strong>: Simultaneous accession to both the Special Tribunal for Aggression AND the Compensation Commission represents a comprehensive legal-accountability commitment to Ukraine, coinciding with the King's visit to Kyiv (2026-04-17). Globally only ≈40 states have joined the tribunal; Sweden's accession is norm-entrepreneurship with historical significance.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis">Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis">Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4160,13 +4160,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis">Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Retention period</th><th>Legal basis</th><th>Access rule</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">P0 Constitutional</td><td align="center">10 years</td><td>Arkivlagen 1990:782 §3 + Riksdag ordning 1991:877 — grundlag-related material treated as permanent evidentiary record</td><td>Public — full analysis published</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P1 Critical (treaty)</td><td align="center">7 years</td><td>SOU-series standard; international-treaty material at UD retention schedule</td><td>Public — full analysis published</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P2 Sector</td><td align="center">5 years</td><td>OSL 2009:400 chap 39 — normal sector-policy retention</td><td>Public — sector summary published</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P3 Routine</td><td align="center">2 years</td><td>Allmän retention</td><td>Internal only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-access-rules">Access Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-access-rules">Access Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-rules"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>All P0/P1 analysis files</strong> are published under the Riksdagsmonitor public-transparency commitment — no redactions.</li>
 <li><strong>Per-document files in <code>documents/</code></strong> are considered reference-grade intelligence artefacts; they should be preserved for minimum 10 years (P0) or 7 years (P1).</li>
 <li><strong>Upstream data dependencies</strong> (riksdagen.se + regeringen.se + World Bank + SCB) are referenced via permanent dok_id URLs — no data copied into the repository beyond what appears in analysis text.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine">Cross-Reference to Classification Doctrine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine">Cross-Reference to Classification Doctrine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine"></a></h3>
 <p>This run's classification decisions align with Hack23 ISMS <code>CLASSIFICATION.md</code> for CIA triad impact:</p>
 
 
@@ -4212,12 +4212,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine">Cross-Reference to Classi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th align="center">Confidentiality</th><th align="center">Integrity</th><th align="center">Availability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH (constitutional record)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH (international treaty)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>No CIA-triad rating change is proposed by this run; existing <code>CLASSIFICATION.md</code> baseline holds.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>XRF-ID</strong>: XRF-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationships">Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationships"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationships">Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationships"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[HD01KU33&#x3C;br/>Beslag/offentlighetsprincip&#x3C;br/>P0 Constitutional] --> B[HD01KU32&#x3C;br/>Media Accessibility&#x3C;br/>P0 Constitutional]
     B --> C[KU Committee Pattern:&#x3C;br/>Two grundlag amendments&#x3C;br/>same riksmöte]
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationships">Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden
     style B fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style D fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs">Forward Chain — Links to Prior Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs">Forward Chain — Links to Prior Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4280,17 +4280,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs">Forward Chain — Links to Prior
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior dok_id</th><th>Prior Run</th><th>Link to This Run</th><th>Type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD0399 (Vårändringsbudget)</td><td>2026-04-18 1705</td><td>Fiscal envelope for Ukraine costs</td><td>Background</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 (Vårproposition)</td><td>2026-04-18 1705</td><td>Economic framework</td><td>Background</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (Juvenile justice)</td><td>2026-04-18 1705</td><td>Part of Strömmer reform agenda (alongside KU33 law enforcement)</td><td>Thematic</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220 (NATO Finland)</td><td>Earlier run</td><td>Ukraine security architecture; HD03231 completes legal layer</td><td>Direct link</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3 (NATO Finland bet)</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>Committee approval of NATO contribution; context for Ukraine propositions</td><td>Context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-continuity-contracts">Continuity Contracts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-continuity-contracts">Continuity Contracts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU33 monitoring contract</strong>: This run creates monitoring obligation to track: (a) chamber vote 2026-04-22, (b) any opposition amendments, (c) Lagrådet opinion if published, (d) second reading timeline post-September 2026 election.</li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine package monitoring contract</strong>: Track UU committee referral of HD03231/232; expected UU betänkande within 8-10 weeks; vote likely before summer recess.</li>
 <li><strong>Housing registry tracking</strong>: CU28 implementation — Lantmäteriet capacity assessment Q3 2026.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis">Inter-Document Pattern Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis">Inter-Document Pattern Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Pattern 1 — Constitutional Double-Move</strong>: KU32 (media accessibility, EU compliance) and KU33 (seizure secrecy, law enforcement) are both grundlag amendments in the same riksmöte. While superficially different in purpose, their simultaneous passage establishes a precedent that grundlag modification is a normal legislative tool. This is historically unusual — Sweden has traditionally treated grundlag amendments with extreme caution.</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern 2 — Ukraine Norm Entrepreneurship</strong>: The combination of HD03231 (Special Tribunal) + HD03232 (Compensation Commission) + HD03220 (NATO Finland contribution) + the King's Kyiv visit forms a coherent pattern: Sweden is actively positioning itself as a Ukraine accountability leader in the post-NATO-accession period. This represents a strategic foreign policy repositioning.</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern 3 — Property Market Anti-Crime Reform</strong>: CU28 (national housing register) + HD01CU27 (lagfart identity) + HD03233 (telecoms fraud, from April 14) form a coordinated anti-financial-crime package, consistent with the Kristersson government's emphasis on law and order across multiple domains.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters">Timeline Spine — Parliamentary Journey of Lead Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters">Timeline Spine — Parliamentary Journey of Lead Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title KU33 + Ukraine Package Parliamentary Journey
     2026-04-16 : HD03231 tabled (UD)
@@ -4307,7 +4307,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters">Timeline Spin
     2027-01 : Post-election riksdag
               : Second reading KU33 + KU32
     2027-01-01 : KU33 + KU32 effect date (if confirmed)</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-continuity-contract-register">Continuity Contract Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contract-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-continuity-contract-register">Continuity Contract Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contract-register"></a></h3>
 <p>Every open forward watchpoint created by this run is tracked in the central continuity register:</p>
 
 
@@ -4371,7 +4371,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-continuity-contract-register">Continuity Contract Register<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Contract ID</th><th>Subject</th><th>Owner</th><th>Closure trigger</th><th>Owner of next check</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CC-KU33-2026-04</td><td>KU33 chamber vote</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>Chamber protokoll 2026-04-22</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-LAGR-KU33</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>Yttrande publication</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-UU-HD03231</td><td>UU referral of HD03231</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>UU committee chair announcement</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-UU-HD03232</td><td>UU referral of HD03232</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>UU committee chair announcement + SD position</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-SAPO-2026</td><td>SÄPO posture post-HD03231</td><td>realtime-monitor + evening-analysis</td><td>Any public SÄPO threat-level update</td><td>Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>CC-ELECTION-2026</td><td>Swedish general election impact on KU33</td><td>weekly-review + month-ahead</td><td>2026-09-13 result</td><td>Post-election run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-CU28-IMPL</td><td>CU28 implementation capacity</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>Lantmäteriet Q3 2026 capacity assessment</td><td>Weekly-review</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar">Cross-Reference to Upstream Exemplar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar">Cross-Reference to Upstream Exemplar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar"></a></h3>
 <p>This run extends the <strong>reference-grade exemplar structure</strong> introduced by <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></a>. Pattern reuse:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Same 14-artifact registry</li>
@@ -4388,14 +4388,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar">Cross-Reference to Upstream Exe
 <li>1219 scenario-analysis shifts probability slightly toward Scenario C because of emergent HD03232 cost uncertainty</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>MTH-ID</strong>: MTH-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 1.0 (Tier-C reference-grade extension)
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Self-audit of the analytic tradecraft applied in realtime-1219, upstream watchpoint reconciliation across 5 sibling runs, and doctrine-level recommendations for codification into <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and <code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>The guide <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 specifies eight rules. This run's application of each:</p>
 
 
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rule</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence / Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">R1</td><td>Pre-article universal gate (read all analysis before writing article)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Pre-Article Gate — all 9 core files read before article emitted</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R2</td><td>Article-type isolation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>All analysis written to <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/</code> — no cross-write</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R3</td><td>Coverage-completeness rule (all DIW ≥ 5 documents appear in article)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>KU33, KU32, HD03231, HD03232, CU28 all covered</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R4</td><td>DIW-weighted lead-story selection</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Sensitivity confirms KU33 lead robust</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R5</td><td>Rhetorical-tension gate</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Domestic-transparency-vs-international-accountability tension surfaced in article lede and every analysis file</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R6</td><td>Depth tiers (L1/L2/L2+/L3)</td><td align="center">⚠️ Partial → ✅</td><td>Pass-1: per-document files @ L2 tier (62-114 lines). Pass-2: expanded per plans; registry now at 14 files</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R7</td><td>Self-audit matrix (this file)</td><td align="center">❌ → ✅</td><td>Pass-1: missing entirely. Pass-2: file created with upstream reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R8</td><td>International benchmarking (≥ 5 jurisdictions per cluster)</td><td align="center">⚠️ Partial → ✅</td><td>Pass-1: 6 jurisdictions inside <code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code> only. Pass-2: full <code>comparative-international.md</code> with ≥ 8 jurisdictions for all three clusters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: the initial 1219 draft was L2 / 9-artifact — the new Tier-C extension (README + executive-brief + scenario-analysis + comparative-international + methodology-reflection) brings the run to L3 / 14-artifact reference-grade parity with <code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4595,9 +4595,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improveme
 <p><strong>Pass-1 baseline</strong>: 9 registry files totalling ~40 KB, 3 per-document files totalling ~20 KB → 60 KB dossier.
 <strong>Pass-2 target</strong>: 14 registry files totalling ~120 KB + 3 per-document files → ~140 KB dossier — <strong>matches the <code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code> reference exemplar</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">3. Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">3. Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h3>
 <p>This section reconciles <strong>every forward indicator</strong> issued in sibling runs over the last 5 days (2026-04-14 → 2026-04-19) and states its disposition in 1219. Dispositions: <strong>Carried forward</strong> · <strong>Retired</strong> · <strong>Carried with reduced priority</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sibling-runs-reviewed">Sibling runs reviewed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-runs-reviewed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sibling-runs-reviewed">Sibling runs reviewed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-runs-reviewed"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4634,7 +4634,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sibling-runs-reviewed">Sibling runs reviewed<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Run</th><th>Path</th><th>Key watchpoints sampled</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/*</code></td><td>Spring budget signals; NATO-Finland betänkande</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-15</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-15/*</code></td><td>Government fortnight calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-16</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-16/*</code></td><td>HD03231/232 tabling indicator</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></td><td>KU32/KU33 first-reading prep; Ukraine royal-visit signal</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-18</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/</code>, <code>weekly-review/</code></td><td>Vårproposition; HD03246; September election scenario priors</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-reconciliation-table">Reconciliation table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconciliation-table"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reconciliation-table">Reconciliation table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconciliation-table"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4762,7 +4762,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reconciliation-table">Reconciliation table<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Upstream Source</th><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Disposition in 1219</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>KU33 chamber-vote scheduling</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Chamber vote now scheduled 2026-04-22 — tracked in <code>executive-brief.md</code> calendar</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>KU32 chamber-vote scheduling</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Same 2026-04-22 window — tracked</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>HD03231 tabling</td><td><strong>Closed</strong></td><td>Tabled 2026-04-16; now per-document analysis in 1219</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>HD03232 tabling</td><td><strong>Closed</strong></td><td>Tabled 2026-04-16; now per-document analysis in 1219</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Not yet published; retained in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> trigger calendar</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>Russian hybrid-response leading indicators post-tribunal vote</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Retained as wildcard W1 in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>; MITRE-TTP in <code>threat-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>US tribunal posture</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Retained as wildcard W2; LOW confidence label</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>Vårproposition fiscal envelope</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Used as fiscal context for HD03232 affordability in <code>comparative-international.md</code> §Macro</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>Vårändringsbudget (HD0399)</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Same use</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>HD03246 juvenile-justice Strömmer agenda</td><td><strong>Carried forward (thematic)</strong></td><td>KU33 is continuation of same crime-enforcement posture</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>HD03236 (not in 1219 cluster)</td><td><strong>Retired</strong></td><td>Outside 1219 document window; handled by date-specific coverage</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>HD01SfU22 (immigration)</td><td><strong>Retired</strong></td><td>Outside cluster; handled elsewhere</td></tr><tr><td align="center">13</td><td>2026-04-18 weekly-review</td><td>September 2026 election scenario priors</td><td><strong>Carried forward — aligned</strong></td><td>Post-election probability priors in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> aligned to weekly-review values</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td>2026-04-16 (if present)</td><td>HD03244 public-sector interoperability</td><td><strong>Retired</strong></td><td>Outside current cluster; referenced only as policy-trend context in stakeholder perspectives §4</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>HD01UFöU3 NATO-Finland</td><td><strong>Carried forward (background)</strong></td><td>Context for Ukraine-package credibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>HD03233 telecoms fraud</td><td><strong>Carried forward (thematic)</strong></td><td>Context for law-and-order policy pattern in <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> §Pattern 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Hard rule compliance</strong>: every watchpoint is either carried forward with a named continuation or retired with an explicit reason. No silent drops. ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots">4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots">4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4806,7 +4806,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots">4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Uncertainty source</th><th>Effect on conclusions</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd bevisning" judicial interpretation</td><td>Novel phrase, no direct comparator jurisprudence</td><td>Scenario A/C probabilities swing ±0.10</td><td>Track Lagrådet yttrande; update on publication</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish contribution to HD03232 administrative budget</td><td>Commission secretariat cost model not published</td><td>±100% error bar on SEK 50-200m/yr estimate</td><td>Track UU committee budget demand on HD03232</td></tr><tr><td>September 2026 election outcome</td><td>5 months to election; inherent volatility</td><td>Post-election confirmation P(KU33) swings 0.25-0.75</td><td>Monthly SOM-poll Bayesian updates</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-response magnitude</td><td>Baseline rising post-NATO accession (2024)</td><td>W1 probability 0.04 (with ±0.05 band)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins; coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour detection</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal posture</td><td>Administration-transition volatility</td><td>W2 probability 0.06 (with ±0.10 band)</td><td>White House + Treasury public statements</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run">5. Known Limitations of This Run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run">5. Known Limitations of This Run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>No primary Swedish-language interview sourcing</strong> — all claims rely on published Riksdag documents, regeringen.se press releases, and secondary academic/NGO material. This is a structural limit of agentic workflow operation.</li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet yttrande had not been published</strong> at run time (2026-04-19 12:19 UTC) — scenario probabilities must be updated when it is.</li>
@@ -4815,7 +4815,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run">5. Known Limitations of This Run<a c
 <li><strong>Red-team / steelman coverage</strong> on KU32 is lighter than on KU33 because KU32 is the secondary cluster — acceptable per R6 depth-tier doctrine.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-probability-alignment-audit">6. Probability-Alignment Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-probability-alignment-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-probability-alignment-audit">6. Probability-Alignment Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-probability-alignment-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4873,7 +4873,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-probability-alignment-audit">6. Probability-Alignment Audit<a class
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">1219 value</th><th align="center">Upstream anchor</th><th align="center">Delta</th><th>Justified by</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Base scenario A probability</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">1434 base = 0.60</td><td align="center">−0.05</td><td>HD03232 cost uncertainty emerged 1219</td></tr><tr><td>Bull scenario B probability</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">1434 bull = 0.20</td><td align="center">0</td><td>No new evidence for strengthening</td></tr><tr><td>Bear scenario C probability</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">1434 bear = 0.15</td><td align="center">+0.05</td><td>Added SD cost-resistance channel</td></tr><tr><td>Wildcard combined</td><td align="center">0.05</td><td align="center">1434 wildcards = 0.05</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Same</td></tr><tr><td>P(KU33 second reading confirmed)</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">weekly-review = 0.60</td><td align="center">−0.05</td><td>Same HD03232 cost-uncertainty drag</td></tr><tr><td>P(Tidö retains majority Sep 2026)</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">weekly-review = 0.38</td><td align="center">−0.03</td><td>Minor poll drift</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Audit finding</strong>: all divergences are within epistemic-band tolerance (±0.10) and have an explicit evidentiary reason. ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">7. Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">7. Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h3>
 <p>These recommendations are proposed for merge into <code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> and <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>:</p>
 
 
@@ -4936,7 +4936,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">7. Recommendations for D
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Recommendation</th><th>Rationale</th><th>Proposed destination</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">D1</td><td><strong>Promote <code>news-realtime-monitor</code> to the 14-artifact Tier-C reference-grade tier</strong></td><td>Realtime-monitor is the flagship editorial surface; every breaking run is consumed externally and must carry the same decision-maker entry points as a weekly review.</td><td>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §14 REQUIRED Artifacts — add <code>news-realtime-monitor</code> to AGGREGATION_TYPES</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D2</td><td><strong>Extend the 14-artifact gate to breaking-news runs</strong> with a <code>breaking_override</code> flag so routine daily runs remain at 9-artifact</td><td>Avoid overwhelming daily runs with Tier-C burden when no lead-story DIW ≥ 7.0 exists</td><td>Workflow-level pre-check gate</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D3</td><td><strong>Make <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> upstream-reconciliation table mandatory</strong> for realtime-monitor runs that carry forward indicators from ≥ 3 sibling runs</td><td>Prevents silent-drop of forward indicators</td><td>Guide §Rule 7 + R7 self-audit doctrine</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D4</td><td><strong>Codify "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretive tracking</strong> as a long-lived watchpoint</td><td>The phrase is the strategic centre of gravity for KU33; needs multi-month tracking</td><td>Continuity-contract template in cross-reference-map.md</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D5</td><td><strong>Require ≥ 5-jurisdiction <code>comparative-international.md</code> for every cluster with DIW ≥ 7.0</strong> regardless of workflow type</td><td>Currently only required for aggregation workflows; KU33 demonstrates the need in realtime-monitor</td><td>Guide §Rule 8 threshold rewrite</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D6</td><td><strong>Require per-document depth-tier declaration in run header</strong> (L1/L2/L2+/L3) with evidence trigger</td><td>The current 1219 per-document files did not declare tier-trigger reasons explicitly</td><td>Per-file template header</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D7</td><td><strong>Add 14-artifact gate test to <code>scripts/analysis-references.ts</code></strong> so the scanner recognises realtime-monitor 14-artifact runs as reference-grade</td><td>Build-time enforcement complements runtime gate</td><td>scripts/analysis-references.ts KNOWN_ANALYSIS_FILES</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D8</td><td><strong>Standardise "Pass-1 → Pass-2 improvement evidence" table</strong> as required section in every methodology-reflection.md</td><td>Provides reproducible quality metric for AI-FIRST iteration principle</td><td>Template in analysis/templates/methodology-reflection.md (new template)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-confidence-self-assessment">8. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-confidence-self-assessment">8. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4989,7 +4989,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-confidence-self-assessment">8. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 lead-story correct per DIW</td><td>Sensitivity analysis robust across 3 weight perturbations</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Rhetorical tension is the analytical heart of the run</td><td>Surfaced in every analysis file and article</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario base-case P = 0.55</td><td>Upstream alignment + independent Bayesian update</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 Swedish contribution SEK 50-200m/yr</td><td>GDP-proportional extrapolation</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Second-reading confirmation forecast 0.55</td><td>Heavy dependency on 2026 election outcome</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid W1 P = 0.04</td><td>Order-of-magnitude from post-NATO-accession base rate</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (direction) / LOW (magnitude)</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative panel ≥ 5 jurisdictions per cluster</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> tabular benchmark</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Upstream watchpoint reconciliation (16 items, 5 runs)</td><td>Reconciliation table above</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers">9. Recommended Next-Review Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers">9. Recommended Next-Review Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers"></a></h3>
 <p>Trigger a new synthesis for this cluster if any of the following occur within 14 days:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/KU32 published (any content)</li>
@@ -5002,8 +5002,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers">9. Recommended Next-Review Trigge
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7 (self-audit) + §Rule 8 (international benchmarking) · <strong>Next review</strong>: 2026-05-01</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Total</strong>: 5 primary documents + 3 supporting government sources</p>
 
 
@@ -5059,7 +5059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Title</th><th>Date</th><th>Priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>betänkande</td><td>KU</td><td>Insyn i handlingar från beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>P0 (Constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>betänkande</td><td>KU</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>P1 (Constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>proposition</td><td>UD</td><td>Sveriges anslutning till tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>P1 (Critical)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>proposition</td><td>UD</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till konventionen om internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>P1 (Critical)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>betänkande</td><td>CU</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>P2 (Sector)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-supporting-sources">Supporting Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-supporting-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-supporting-sources">Supporting Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-supporting-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5091,18 +5091,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-supporting-sources">Supporting Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Type</th><th>Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Regeringen press release 2026-04-17</td><td>Pressmeddelande</td><td>H.M. Konungen + FM Malmer Stenergard besöker Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen press release 2026-04-18</td><td>Pressmeddelande</td><td>Stöd till kulturarvsbevarande i Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank SWE GDP Growth 2024</td><td>Economic data</td><td>GDP growth 0.82% (2024), down from 5.2% in 2021</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank SWE Inflation 2024</td><td>Economic data</td><td>Inflation 2.836% (2024), down from 8.5% in 2023</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-freshness">Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-freshness">Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Riksdag data</strong>: Live as of 2026-04-19T12:19:53Z (status: "live")</li>
 <li><strong>Government data</strong>: g0v.se last synced within 24h</li>
 <li><strong>World Bank</strong>: Most recent available (2024 values)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-previous-run-coverage">Previous Run Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-coverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-run-coverage">Previous Run Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-coverage"></a></h3>
 <p>The previous realtime run (2026-04-18 1705) covered: HD03100, HD03236, HD03246, HD01SfU22, HD0399. All 5 documents in this run are NEW (not previously covered).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>AI-driven analysis following <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1.
 Per-document depth tiers: KU33 (L3), KU32 (L2+), HD03231+HD03232 (L2+), CU28 (L2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-chain-of-custody-manifest">Chain-of-Custody Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-custody-manifest"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-chain-of-custody-manifest">Chain-of-Custody Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-custody-manifest"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5190,14 +5190,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-chain-of-custody-manifest">Chain-of-Custody Manifest<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Source</th><th>URL / Reference</th><th>Accessed</th><th>Fetched via</th><th>Caching</th><th>Integrity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD01KU33</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache (run-scoped)</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD01KU32</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD03231</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD03232</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD01CU28</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Regeringen.se — 2026-04-17 presser</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/">https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:20Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>World Bank — Sweden GDP growth 2024</td><td><a href="https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG">https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:21Z</td><td>world-bank-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>JSON valid</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>World Bank — Sweden CPI 2024</td><td><a href="https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG">https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:21Z</td><td>world-bank-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>JSON valid</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-integrity-rules">Provenance Integrity Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-integrity-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-integrity-rules">Provenance Integrity Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-integrity-rules"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All riksdag-regering-mcp calls use HTTPS transport to <a href="https://riksdag-regering-ai.onrender.com/mcp">https://riksdag-regering-ai.onrender.com/mcp</a> with proxy allowlist enforcement.</li>
 <li>World Bank data retrieved via worldbank-mcp (container <code>node:25-alpine</code> per <code>.github/workflows/news-realtime-monitor.lock.yml</code> mcp-servers block).</li>
 <li>No personal data (PII) is cached; all fetched content is official public record.</li>
 <li>Cache retention: session-scoped only (per agent run); no persistent storage of external data in the repository.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-quality-rating">Document-Quality Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-quality-rating"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-quality-rating">Document-Quality Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-quality-rating"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5252,7 +5252,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-quality-rating">Document-Quality Rating<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th align="center">Quality rating</th><th align="center">Completeness</th><th align="center">Primary-source confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33 betänkande</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 betänkande</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 proposition</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 proposition</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 betänkande</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen.se presser (King Kyiv)</td><td align="center">Government press release</td><td align="center">Full</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank GDP / CPI</td><td align="center">Public API</td><td align="center">Full</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage-completeness-attestation">Coverage-Completeness Attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-completeness-attestation">Coverage-Completeness Attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5.0 appear in the published article with dedicated H2/H3 sections:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ HD01KU33 (8.48) — H2 lead-story section</li>
@@ -5261,6 +5261,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-coverage-completeness-attestation">Coverage-Completeness Attestation<
 <li>✅ HD01CU28 (5.93) — H3 under "Sector updates"</li>
 </ul>
 <p>All per-document files exist at the declared depth tier. See <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Pass-1 → Pass-2 improvement evidence for the reference-grade-extension audit.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -5300,7 +5320,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:04.558Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:25.940Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html b/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html
index d8af81a72f..afffca90c1 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Realtime Monitor 1219">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.832Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.222Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:04.832Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.222Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-19T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1219","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) on 2026-04-17 advanced a second Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) amendment in the same riksmöte — betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — narrowing offentlighetsprincipen by…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:04.832Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Realtime Monitor 1219","description":"Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) on 2026-04-17 advanced a second Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) amendment in the same riksmöte — betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — narrowing offentlighetsprincipen by…","datePublished":"2026-04-19T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:26.222Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-19-realtime-1219-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <em>One-page decision-maker briefing for newsroom editors, policy advisors, and senior analysts</em>
 </p>
@@ -236,10 +236,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>BRIEF-ID</strong></td><td>BRF-2026-04-19-1219</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public · Time-to-read ≤ 3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Read Before</strong></td><td>Any editorial, policy, or international-affairs decision based on this run</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decision Horizon</strong></td><td>24 hrs / 2 weeks / post-election 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH on lead selection; MEDIUM on post-election outcomes</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden's Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) on 2026-04-17 advanced a second <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (TF) amendment in the same riksmöte — betänkande 2025/26:KU33 — narrowing offentlighetsprincipen by removing digital materials seized during husrannsakan from the definition of <em>allmän handling</em> until material is "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>." First reading is scheduled for 2026-04-22. Because grundlag change requires two identical Riksdag votes spanning a general election, the September 2026 campaign becomes a de-facto referendum on the narrowing — the amendment cannot take effect before January 2027.</strong> On the same 24-hour window, PM Ulf Kristersson and FM Maria Malmer Stenergard tabled Sweden's accession to the <strong>Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine (HD03231)</strong> — the first aggression tribunal since Nuremberg — and the <strong>Convention on the International Compensation Commission for Ukraine (HD03232)</strong>, whose €260bn frozen-asset framework creates the financial accountability arm. <strong>The coordinated royal visit of H.M. King Carl Gustaf + FM Malmer Stenergard to Kyiv on 2026-04-17 — one day after both Ukraine propositions were tabled — elevates the package to a national-commitment signal that transcends partisan politics.</strong> The cluster reveals a paradox — Sweden narrowing domestic transparency while advancing international accountability — explicitly flagged as the opposition-exploitable campaign theme for September 2026. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-decisions-this-brief-supports">🎯 Three Decisions This Brief
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Evidence Locus</th><th align="right">Action Window</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> §Publication Decision; DIW 8.48 vs 8.33</td><td align="right">Immediate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO engagement posture</strong> (SJF, RSF-SE, TU, Utgivarna)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R2 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> W1 × T1 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §KU33 benchmarks</td><td align="right">Before Lagrådet yttrande / Chamber vote 2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Russia hybrid-threat monitoring heightening</strong></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §4 Russia ops · Kill Chain §3 · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> Wildcard W1</td><td align="right">Continuous; step-up immediately on HD03231 chamber vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to Know in 60 Seconds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The #1 finding is the KU33 grundlag amendment.</strong> Narrows "allmän handling" status on digital material seized at husrannsakan until <em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>. The interpretive scope of that phrase is the <strong>strategic centre of gravity</strong> — whether it is read strictly (narrow carve-out) or discretionarily (broad chilling effect) decides whether this is a limited reform or a systemic press-freedom regression. <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) + compensation commission (HD03232) are co-prominent.</strong> Global news-value 9.0; no direct Swedish fiscal burden for reparations (funded from Russian frozen assets); administrative contribution ≈ SEK 50-200m/yr; cross-party consensus near-universal (≈ 349 MPs). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-readers-need-to-know-in-60-seconds">📐 What Readers Need to K
 <li><strong>Coverage-completeness rule met.</strong> All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5 are covered in the published article (KU33, KU32, Ukraine package, CU28). <code>[HIGH]</code></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 9 ministers / party leaders / institutional actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors">🎭 Named Actors to Watch (≥ 9 ministers / party leaders / institutional actors)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--named-actors-to-watch--9-ministers--party-leaders--institutional-act
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Why They Matter Now</th><th align="center">Primary dok_id</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong> (M, PM)</td><td>Government leader; signatory HD03231 + HD03232</td><td>Political owner of both the constitutional and foreign-policy packages; legacy bet on Ukraine accountability</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232, HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong> (M, FM)</td><td>Tribunal architect; Kyiv visit with King</td><td>First-aggression-tribunal-since-Nuremberg framing; norm-entrepreneurship capital</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong> (M, Justitieminister)</td><td>KU33 investigative-integrity champion</td><td>Defines "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" interpretation in practice; owner of Strömmer crime-enforcement agenda (KU33, HD03246 juvenile justice)</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong> (M, Finansminister)</td><td>Spring budget architect</td><td>Sets fiscal envelope for HD03232 administrative contribution; tight 2026 margins</td><td align="center">HD0399, HD03100 (upstream context)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong> (S, party leader)</td><td>Opposition leader</td><td>Her position on KU33 second reading will decide post-election coalition arithmetic</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong> (L, party leader)</td><td>Liberal identity; coalition partner</td><td>Most press-freedom sensitive inside Tidö; Lagrådet outcome may force repositioning</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong> (V, party leader)</td><td>Left opposition</td><td>Campaign voice against KU33 on civil-liberties grounds</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Daniel Helldén</strong> (MP, språkrör)</td><td>Green opposition</td><td>Grundlag-protection advocate; environmental-inspection access at stake in KU33</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jimmy Åkesson</strong> (SD, party leader)</td><td>Tidö coalition partner</td><td>Owner of SD cost-resistance line on HD03232; can break cooperation</td><td align="center">HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>H.M. King Carl Gustaf XVI</strong></td><td>Swedish head of state</td><td>Kyiv visit 2026-04-17 elevates HD03231/232 beyond partisan frame</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Constitutional-review council</td><td>Pending proportionality yttrande on KU33 is the single most consequential pre-vote signal</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Justitieombudsman Erik Nymansson</strong></td><td>Riksdagens JO</td><td>Post-implementation monitoring of "tillförd" discretion</td><td align="center">HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ann-Sofie Alm</strong> (M, KU chair)</td><td>Committee chair</td><td>Formally proposed adoption of both KU32 and KU33</td><td align="center">HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Volodymyr Zelensky</strong></td><td>Ukraine President</td><td>Hosted Kyiv visit; international counter-signatory</td><td align="center">HD03231, HD03232</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch">🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch">🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-forward-calendar--what-to-watch">🔮 14-Day Forward Calendar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date / Window</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Impact</th><th>Monitoring Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-22</strong></td><td><strong>Chamber vote on KU33 + KU32 (first reading)</strong></td><td>Constitutional-vote opportunity; watch for minority Ja-vote or SD abstention</td><td>Riksdag kammare protokoll</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026 (TBD)</td><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/KU32</strong></td><td>Bayesian update: strict "formellt tillförd" language ⇒ R2 ↓ 4 points; silent ⇒ R2 ↑ 4</td><td>Lagrådet publications</td></tr><tr><td>Apr–Jun 2026</td><td><strong>UU committee referral + hearing of HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Cross-party stance crystallisation; SD cost-reservations surface here</td><td>UU committee calendar</td></tr><tr><td>Late-May / Jun 2026</td><td><strong>Kammarvote on HD03231 / HD03232</strong></td><td>Tribunal + reparations accession vote; expected broad cross-party Ja</td><td>Riksdag kammare</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous</td><td><strong>SÄPO cyber/hybrid bulletins</strong></td><td>Russia-posture leading indicators after HD03231 accession</td><td>SÄPO PUBLIKATIONER</td></tr><tr><td>H2 2026</td><td><strong>Press-freedom NGO joint remissvar (SJF, TU, Utgivarna, RSF-SE)</strong></td><td>Sets interpretive record on "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>"</td><td>Media-union statements</td></tr><tr><td>Sep 13 2026</td><td><strong>Swedish general election</strong></td><td>Post-election riksdag composition ⇒ KU33 second-reading prospects</td><td>Valmyndigheten</td></tr><tr><td>Jan 2027</td><td><strong>Post-election riksdag second reading of KU32 + KU33</strong></td><td>Binding constitutional vote; effect date 2027-01-01 if confirmed</td><td>Riksdag protokoll</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Top-5 Risks (detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Top-5 Risks (detail in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-top-5-risks-detail-in-risk-assessmentmd">⚖️ Top-5 Risks (deta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L × I</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Trend</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Ukraine Compensation Commission cost escalation beyond Swedish fiscal envelope</td><td align="center">0.55 × 0.75</td><td align="center">0.41</td><td align="center">↗ Rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>KU33 second-reading reversal after September 2026 election</td><td align="center">0.40 × 0.90</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">↗ Rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>SD cooperation withdrawal on HD03232 financing</td><td align="center">0.45 × 0.80</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">→ Stable</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>ECHR Article 10 legal challenge to KU33</td><td align="center">0.50 × 0.70</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">↗ Rising</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Russian hybrid interference targeting Swedish tribunal-advocacy posture</td><td align="center">0.40 × 0.75</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">↗ Rising (post-vote)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confidence — Honest Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -541,20 +541,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-analyst-confidence--honest-self-assessment">⚠️ Analyst Confid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW-correct)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>DIW v1.0 sensitivity-tested; KU33 remains #1 under all plausible weight permutations (see <code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Sensitivity)</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5.0 covered in article and per-document files</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (<strong>first</strong> reading, 2026-04-22)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Established KU patterns; coalition majority secure on first reading</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party vote projection (<strong>second</strong> reading, Jan 2027)</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Depends entirely on 2026 election outcome — inherent electoral uncertainty</td></tr><tr><td>"<em>Formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" interpretation prediction</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Interpretively fragile; three plausible postures documented in <code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 Swedish administrative contribution estimate</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong></td><td>GDP-proportional extrapolation; Commission secretariat cost model not yet published</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-warfare response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>Historical pattern (post-NATO accession 2024) suggests rising baseline; exact timing uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>US administration position on HD03231 tribunal</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td>Public statements ambiguous; administration may shift toward disengagement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-links">📎 Cross-Links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-links"></a></h3>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/README.md">README</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md">Significance</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md">SWOT</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md">Risk</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md">Threat</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md">Stakeholders</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md">Scenarios</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md">Comparative</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md">Cross-References</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md">Classification</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md">Methodology Reflection</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md">Manifest</a></p>
 <p>Per-document: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md">HD01KU33 (LEAD, L3)</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md">HD03231 + HD03232 (L2+)</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md">HD01KU32 (L2+)</a></p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-26 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SYN-ID</strong>: SYN-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: red-team box, analyst-confidence meter, ACH anchor)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on lead selection · MEDIUM on post-election outcomes
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[📰 Lead: KU33&#x3C;br/>Constitutional Amendment&#x3C;br/>DIW 8.48] --> B{Twin Tension}
     C[🌍 Co-Lead: Ukraine Package&#x3C;br/>Tribunal + Commission&#x3C;br/>DIW 8.33] --> B
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden
     style C fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style D fill:#ff6600,color:#fff
     style E fill:#00aa44,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-top-findings">Top Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-findings">Top Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -609,16 +609,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-findings">Top Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Finding</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Significance</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Riksdag to vote on constitutional amendment (KU33) removing seized digital materials from offentlighetsprincipen</strong> — first reading scheduled for 2026-04-22; second reading required post-September 2026 election</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>DIW 8.48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Sweden joins both Ukraine Special Tribunal (for Aggression) AND Compensation Commission</strong> — twin propositions (HD03231/HD03232) submitted to Riksdag 2026-04-16, coinciding with King Carl Gustaf + FM Malmer Stenergard's Kyiv visit</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>DIW 8.33</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>Second grundlag amendment (KU32)</strong> in same riksmöte — accessibility requirements for media; establishes pattern of constitutional modification as routine legislative tool</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>DIW 7.98</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>National housing rights register approved</strong> (CU28) — Riksdag to approve national bostadsrättsregister modernizing mortgage market; part of broader anti-financial-crime package. Tracked as context; DIW 5.93 is below the ≥7.0 article-section threshold so not featured in the breaking-news articles (per article-coverage gate).</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>DIW 5.93</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY LEAD</strong>: KU33 — Sweden's Constitutional Revision Committee has advanced an amendment to Tryckfrihetsförordningen removing police-seized digital materials from public record status, with the first-reading vote scheduled for 2026-04-22. This is the highest DIW-scored item (8.48) because of the 30% democratic infrastructure weighting — a constitutional change takes decades to reverse and directly affects press freedom and government accountability.</p>
 <p><strong>CO-LEAD</strong>: Ukraine Package — Sweden's simultaneous accession to the Special Tribunal for Aggression AND the International Compensation Commission for Ukraine, concurrent with the King's diplomatic Kyiv visit (2026-04-17), represents a historic commitment to Ukraine accountability that deserves equal prominence due to extraordinary news value.</p>
 <p><strong>MANDATORY RHETORICAL TENSION</strong>: These two lead stories embody a striking contradiction. Sweden, which is cementing itself as an international rule-of-law champion on Ukraine accountability, is simultaneously narrowing its own domestic transparency architecture. This tension is the analytical heart of this monitoring run and MUST be surfaced explicitly in any published article.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-aggregated-swot">Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregated-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregated-swot">Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregated-swot"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Strengths</strong>: Constitutional process integrity (KU33 vilande mechanism ensures democratic deliberation across election); Ukraine norm-entrepreneurship (Special Tribunal + Compensation Commission positions Sweden globally); cross-party consensus on Ukraine.</p>
 <p><strong>Weaknesses</strong>: Offentlighetsprincipen erosion risk — KU33 removes publicity presumption for seized materials; minority government dependency on SD (Tidö Agreement); pattern of incremental grundlag modification.</p>
 <p><strong>Opportunities</strong>: Sweden as EU rule-of-law leader; digital property market modernization (CU28 reduces mortgage fraud); NATO credibility deepening via Ukraine legal commitment.</p>
 <p><strong>Threats</strong>: ECHR Article 10 challenge (KU33); election risk that KU33 fails second reading if opposition wins September 2026; SD cost resistance on Ukraine compensation; Russian information operations targeting Sweden's Ukraine tribunal advocacy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-landscape-summary">Risk Landscape Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape-summary">Risk Landscape Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-landscape-summary">Risk Landscape Summary<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Priority</th><th>Risk</th><th>Score</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Ukraine cost escalation</td><td>0.41</td><td>24-36m</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>KU33 post-election reversal</td><td>0.36</td><td>12-18m</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SD cooperation withdrawal</td><td>0.36</td><td>3-9m</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ECHR challenge to KU33</td><td>0.35</td><td>6-24m</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch">Forward Indicators — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch">Forward Indicators — What to Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -698,16 +698,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators--what-to-watch">Forward Indicators — What to Wat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th><th>Alert threshold</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Chamber vote on KU33 + KU32</td><td>Constitutional votes; watch for minority opposition</td><td>Any Ja vote &#x3C; 175</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05 (est)</td><td>UU committee referral of HD03231/232</td><td>Ukraine propositions move to committee</td><td>Committee chair appointment</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06 (est)</td><td>UU betänkande on Ukraine package</td><td>Committee recommendation</td><td>Any SD reservation</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09</td><td>Swedish election</td><td>KU33 second reading fate</td><td>If S+V+MP win majority</td></tr><tr><td>2027-01</td><td>KU33 second reading (if confirmed election)</td><td>Final constitutional decision</td><td>Vote outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's GDP grew 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from -0.20% contraction in 2023), while inflation fell to 2.84% (from 8.55% in 2023). This improving but fragile macroeconomic position shapes the fiscal feasibility of Ukraine compensation contributions. Finance Minister Svantesson's Vårproposition (HD03100) projects continued modest growth, but the fiscal space for open-ended international commitments is constrained — a tension between Ukraine ambition and economic prudence that runs through HD03232.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-box">🛡️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Box<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team--devils-advocate-box"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team--devils-advocate-box">🛡️ Red-Team / Devil's Advocate Box<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team--devils-advocate-box"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>What would a steelman critique of this synthesis say?</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p><strong>Red-team position on the lead-story ranking</strong>: The DIW weighting gives KU33 (8.48) a 0.15-point edge over the Ukraine package (8.33). But this is within the epistemic error band of the DIW instrument itself (±0.20). Under a weight perturbation where Democratic Infrastructure falls from 0.30 to 0.25 and Cross-party rises from 0.10 to 0.15, the Ukraine package overtakes KU33. <strong>Verdict retained</strong> — KU33 remains the robust lead under 4 of 5 plausible weight permutations; the co-lead treatment explicitly handles the remaining case.</p>
 <p><strong>Red-team position on the rhetorical tension</strong>: The "domestic retrenchment vs international accountability" framing assumes these are in tension. An alternative framing: the two packages are <strong>coherent</strong> — both assert state prerogative over information (law-enforcement investigation integrity domestically; international-law enforcement integrity abroad). Under this framing there is no contradiction, only consistent state-capacity assertion. <strong>Verdict retained but surfaced</strong> — the tension framing is the <em>opposition's</em> expected rhetorical move, not the government's; article acknowledges both framings.</p>
 <p><strong>Red-team position on Scenario C (bear)</strong>: We assign Scenario C only 0.20 probability despite meaningful Lagrådet and SD cost-risk. An alternative analysis giving Scenario C 0.30 would require either (a) polling showing Tidö bloc &#x3C; 44% in May, or (b) an early SD public red-line on HD03232. Neither has materialised as of 2026-04-19. <strong>Verdict</strong>: Scenario C probability will be raised to 0.30 if either trigger fires.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-ach-informed">🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-uncertainties-ach-informed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties-ach-informed">🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-ach-informed"></a></h3>
 <p>Linked from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §ACH:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Will "formellt tillförd bevisning" be read strictly or discretionarily?</strong> Strict ⇒ narrow reform; discretionary ⇒ systemic chilling. This single interpretive question dominates KU33 downstream impact. Lagrådet yttrande is the decisive early signal. <code>[Confidence: MEDIUM; will update on Lagrådet publication]</code></li>
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-uncertainties-ach-informed">🎯 Key Uncertainties (ACH-informed
 <li><strong>Will SD hold or defect on HD03232?</strong> SD's cost-transparency demand is the most likely fracture point; no public red line yet. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Will Russian hybrid response escalate after HD03231 chamber vote?</strong> Baseline rising post-NATO accession (2024); tribunal accession adds target signature. <code>[MEDIUM on direction / LOW on magnitude]</code></li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analyst-confidence-meter">🧭 Analyst-Confidence Meter<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Delta from 1434</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead-story selection (DIW)</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>Coverage completeness</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>First-reading vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>Second-reading vote projection</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd" interpretation</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 contribution sizing</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">new</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid response magnitude</td><td align="center"><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal posture</td><td align="center"><strong>LOW</strong></td><td align="center">→</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-file-navigation">🔗 Cross-File Navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-file-navigation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-file-navigation">🔗 Cross-File Navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-file-navigation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>For the one-page decision brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
 <li>For scenario probabilities and ACH grid: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
@@ -777,12 +777,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-file-navigation">🔗 Cross-File Navigation<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>For per-document deep-dive: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a> (LEAD, L3)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SIG-ID</strong>: SIG-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 — fully enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix">Democratic-Impact Weighting (DIW) Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -850,31 +850,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-democratic-impact-weighting-diw-scoring-matrix">Democratic-Impact Wei
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Document</th><th>DI (30%)</th><th>ParSig (15%)</th><th>PolImp (15%)</th><th>PubInt (15%)</th><th>Urgency (15%)</th><th>Cross-party (10%)</th><th><strong>DIW Score</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar från beslag/husrannsakan</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>9.5</td><td>8.0</td><td>7.5</td><td>8.5</td><td>7.0</td><td><strong>8.48</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03231+HD03232</td><td>Ukraine Tribunal + Compensation Commission</td><td>7.0</td><td>8.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.5</td><td>9.5</td><td><strong>8.33</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>9.5</td><td>7.0</td><td>6.5</td><td>8.5</td><td>8.0</td><td><strong>7.98</strong></td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>4.0</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.5</td><td>6.5</td><td>7.0</td><td>6.5</td><td><strong>5.93</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>DIW Weight Formula</strong>: (DI×0.30) + (ParSig×0.15) + (PolImp×0.15) + (PubInt×0.15) + (Urgency×0.15) + (Cross×0.10)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-1">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-1">Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lead Story</strong>: <strong>HD01KU33</strong> — Score 8.48 (highest DIW, constitutional amendment)<br>
 <strong>Co-Lead</strong>: <strong>HD03231+HD03232</strong> — Score 8.33 (Ukraine law package, timely with royal diplomatic visit)<br>
 <strong>Secondary</strong>: <strong>HD01KU32</strong> — Score 7.98 (constitutional amendment, accessibility)</p>
 <p><strong>Rationale</strong>: KU33 scores highest because the 30% Democratic Infrastructure weight captures the constitutional significance of narrowing offentlighetsprincipen — a reversal that can only be undone after an election. The Ukraine propositions score only slightly lower due to extraordinary public interest (9.0) combined with the King's visit to Kyiv.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rhetorical-tension">Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rhetorical-tension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rhetorical-tension">Rhetorical Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rhetorical-tension"></a></h3>
 <p>The session presents a striking juxtaposition:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>KU33 <strong>narrows</strong> public transparency rights (offentlighetsprincipen) for law enforcement seizures</li>
 <li>The Ukraine package simultaneously advances Sweden's role in establishing international rule-of-law accountability mechanisms</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This tension between domestic transparency restriction and international accountability promotion MUST be surfaced in the article.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage-completeness-check">Coverage Completeness Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-completeness-check">Coverage Completeness Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-check"></a></h3>
 <p>Documents with DIW ≥ 7.0 requiring dedicated H3 sections:</p>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> HD01KU33 (8.48) → must be H3</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> HD03231+HD03232 (8.33) → must be H3</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> HD01KU32 (7.98) → must be H3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PUBLISH</strong>: YES — HIGH severity (maximum DIW 8.48 > threshold 7.0)<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Breaking / Realtime update<br>
 <strong>Languages</strong>: EN + SV<br>
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (live MCP data, government sources confirmed)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>If we increase Cross-party weight to 15% (at expense of DI):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Ukraine package moves to #1 (broad cross-party + international weight)</li>
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Result: Ukraine package becomes co-equal lead, rhetorical tension becomes more prominent</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This sensitivity confirms the article should treat BOTH stories as co-leads.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs">Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs">Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-five-dimension-diw-sensitivity-runs">Five-Dimension DIW Sensitivity R
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Perturbation</th><th align="center">DI</th><th align="center">ParSig</th><th align="center">PolImp</th><th align="center">PubInt</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Cross</th><th align="center">KU33</th><th align="center">Ukraine</th><th align="center">KU32</th><th align="center">CU28</th><th align="center">Lead?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Baseline (published)</strong></td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center"><strong>8.48</strong></td><td align="center">8.33</td><td align="center">7.98</td><td align="center">5.93</td><td align="center">KU33 ✅</td></tr><tr><td>DI −0.05, Cross +0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">8.15</td><td align="center"><strong>8.35</strong></td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">5.95</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td>PubInt +0.05, DI −0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">8.10</td><td align="center"><strong>8.43</strong></td><td align="center">7.50</td><td align="center">5.98</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency +0.05, DI −0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center"><strong>8.45</strong></td><td align="center">8.48</td><td align="center">7.90</td><td align="center">5.87</td><td align="center">Tied</td></tr><tr><td>PolImp +0.05, DI −0.05</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">8.28</td><td align="center"><strong>8.45</strong></td><td align="center">7.75</td><td align="center">5.95</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>All equal (baseline check)</strong></td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">8.25</td><td align="center"><strong>8.67</strong></td><td align="center">7.60</td><td align="center">6.25</td><td align="center">Ukraine</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: KU33 wins outright under baseline weights (Democratic-Infrastructure emphasis). Under 4 of 5 alternative weights, Ukraine package takes the lead or ties. This confirms the <strong>co-lead treatment</strong> is analytically sound — either story could plausibly be the lead under minor weight perturbation, justifying equal article prominence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision-annex">Publication Decision Annex<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-annex"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision-annex">Publication Decision Annex<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-annex"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1041,12 +1041,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-publication-decision-annex">Publication Decision Annex<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Value</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Article type</strong></td><td>Breaking / Realtime</td><td>Maximum DIW 8.48 ≥ 7.0 threshold</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Languages published</strong></td><td>EN + SV</td><td>Standard for breaking realtime runs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Future translations</strong></td><td>All 14 languages</td><td>Queue via news-translate workflow, priority HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Headline structure</strong></td><td>Lead (KU33) + Co-Lead (Ukraine)</td><td>DIW sensitivity confirms co-lead</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coverage of CU28</strong></td><td>Secondary section (weighted 5.93)</td><td>Meets coverage-completeness threshold</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Royal-visit framing</strong></td><td>Included in lede paragraph</td><td>S2 strength amplifies HD03231/232 package</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rhetorical tension framing</strong></td><td>Explicitly named</td><td>Mandatory per R5; tension is analytical heart</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence declaration</strong></td><td>HIGH on lead; MEDIUM post-election</td><td>Per <code>executive-brief.md</code> analyst-confidence meter</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>STA-ID</strong>: STA-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched — 8 stakeholder groups + named actors)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">radar
     title Stakeholder Impact Scores (0-10)
     Citizens: 7
@@ -1057,8 +1057,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     International EU: 9
     Judiciary Constitutional: 9
     Media Public Opinion: 9</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis">8 Stakeholder Group Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis">8 Stakeholder Group Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-group-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (7/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: MIXED</p>
 <p>Citizens face two countervailing developments:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" h
 <li>Action available: Contact MP before chamber vote 2026-04-22</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Individual Swedish citizens represented by TU (Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå) editorial interest; organized through media unions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd">2. Government parties (M, KD, L) + support party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd">2. Government parties (M, KD, L) + support party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (8/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: SUPPORTIVE</p>
 <p><strong>Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson (M)</strong>: Leading the Ukraine proposition package personally (signed HD03231, HD03232). The King's Kyiv visit coinciding with parliamentary accession creates a diplomatic legacy moment. Kristersson faces pressure from SD on cost limits.</p>
 <p><strong>Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong>: Accompanied King Carl Gustaf to Ukraine on 2026-04-17; her signature on both Ukraine propositions places her at the centre of Swedish norm-leadership on international accountability.</p>
@@ -1081,44 +1081,44 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-parties-m-kd-l--support-party-sd">2. Government parties
 <p><strong>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)</strong>: KU33 advances law enforcement interests (seizure secrecy); HD03246 (juvenile justice, from previous run) continues his tough-on-crime agenda.</p>
 <p><strong>SD</strong>: Jimmy Åkesson's party must balance NATO/Ukraine support (for credibility) against voter base skepticism about international financial commitments. SD's cooperation in the Tidö Agreement is not unconditional; Ukraine costs are a potential red line.</p>
 <p><strong>KD</strong>: Strongly supportive of Ukraine — consistent with Christian democratic values; no risk of defection on HD03231/232.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (7/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: MIXED — SUPPORT Ukraine, OPPOSE KU33</p>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>: Generally supportive of Ukraine accountability; former Foreign Minister Ann Linde championed similar international justice initiatives. However, S will scrutinize the proportionality of KU33's secrecy carve-out.</p>
 <p><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>: Strong Ukraine support (unusual alignment with government); LIKELY TO OPPOSE KU33 on civil liberties grounds. V's press freedom record suggests they will seek the narrowest possible reading of the amendment.</p>
 <p><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>: Support Ukraine; LIKELY TO RAISE CONCERNS about KU33's impact on environmental inspection transparency — seized documents in environmental enforcement are directly affected.</p>
 <p><strong>Key tension</strong>: S may feel politically trapped — opposing KU33 civil liberties restrictions while supporting the same government's Ukraine propositions creates messaging complexity.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM (5/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: MIXED</p>
 <p><strong>Real estate sector</strong>: Strongly supportive of CU28 (national housing register) — the sector has lobbied for this for years to reduce bostadsrätts fraud and enable digital mortgage processing. SBAB, Swedbank, and major mortgage lenders benefit from accurate pledge registration.</p>
 <p><strong>Media companies (TV4, SVT, commercial press)</strong>: KU33 and KU32 directly affect their operating environment. KU32 (accessibility requirements) adds compliance costs; KU33 reduces their access to seized material.</p>
 <p><strong>Technology sector</strong>: HD03244 (public sector interoperability, from April 16) creates new market for digital services; not covered in this run but context for policy trend.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (8/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: CRITICAL of KU33, SUPPORTIVE of Ukraine</p>
 <p><strong>Transparency International Sweden</strong>: Will likely issue statement against KU33 — seizure document exemptions reduce accountability for law enforcement misconduct.</p>
 <p><strong>Reportrar utan gränser / Swedish section of RSF</strong>: Specifically threatened by KU33 — investigative journalists rely on access to seized materials to document police operations.</p>
 <p><strong>Amnesty International Sweden</strong>: Strongly supportive of Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) — consistent with their mandate on accountability for international crimes including aggression.</p>
 <p><strong>Human Rights Watch</strong>: HD03232 (Compensation Commission) represents a model they have promoted globally; Sweden's accession strengthens the institution.</p>
 <p><strong>Brottsofferjouren</strong>: CU28 housing register indirectly reduces property crime; supportive.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH (9/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: POSITIVE (Ukraine), WATCHING (KU33)</p>
 <p><strong>Council of Europe</strong>: Monitoring KU33 for compatibility with European Convention on Human Rights Article 10 (freedom of expression). Sweden's accession to Special Tribunal (HD03231) aligns with Council of Europe's Reykjavik Declaration (2023) on Ukraine accountability.</p>
 <p><strong>European Commission</strong>: KU32 implements EU Accessibility Act 2025 into Swedish grundlag — positive compliance signal. KU33 is a national matter but ECHR review could involve Commission amicus.</p>
 <p><strong>NATO allies</strong>: Sweden's contribution to NATO's forward presence in Finland (HD03220, from previous run) and the Ukraine propositions reinforce Sweden's credibility as a committed alliance member — especially important as Sweden is still relatively new to NATO (2024 accession).</p>
 <p><strong>Ukraine government</strong>: HD03231 and HD03232 directly advance Ukrainian war accountability interests. Combined with the King's visit, this represents Sweden's strongest pro-Ukraine legislative moment since NATO accession.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary &#x26; Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH (9/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: PROFESSIONAL (implementing); POTENTIALLY CRITICAL on KU33 scope</p>
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong>: Has already reviewed the government's grundlag proposals. Lagrådet's scrutiny of KU33's proportionality — specifically whether the seizure exemption is narrowly tailored enough — determines whether the first reading vote generates legal controversy.</p>
 <p><strong>Riksdagens justitieombudsman (JO)</strong>: Erik Nymansson (current Chefsjustitieombudsman) oversees public administration transparency. JO has jurisdiction to investigate instances where the KU33 carve-out is misapplied. JO will be an important monitoring actor post-implementation.</p>
 <p><strong>Justitiekanslern (JK)</strong>: Ultimate defender of state compliance with ECHR and EU law. If KU33 generates ECHR complaints, JK's position becomes significant.</p>
 <p><strong>International Criminal Court</strong>: Sweden is already an ICC member. Adding Special Tribunal (HD03231) creates a parallel jurisdiction for aggression crimes — complementary to ICC, which cannot try heads-of-state of non-member states (Russia is not an ICC member for this purpose).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media &#x26; Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH (9/10) | <strong>Stance</strong>: CONFLICTED</p>
 <p><strong>Dagens Nyheter / Svenska Dagbladet</strong>: Both major broadsheets will editorialize strongly on KU33 — this is precisely the kind of constitutional change that Swedish press has historically contested vigorously.</p>
 <p><strong>SVT Nyheter / Aktuellt</strong>: King's Ukraine visit provides compelling broadcast news hook; easy to under-report the technical constitutional dimensions of KU33.</p>
 <p><strong>Social media</strong>: KU33 unlikely to break through to mass audience unless media frame it as "press freedom restriction." Ukraine tribunal has higher virality due to royal diplomatic dimension.</p>
 <p><strong>Public polling context</strong>: Latest Riksdagen confidence polling (early April 2026) shows Tidö coalition at approximately 48% combined — still below 50% majority, making the autumn election highly competitive. Ukraine policy enjoys cross-party public support (~68% in most recent SOM Institute data).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network">🕸️ Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">🕸️ Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     PM[Ulf Kristersson&#x3C;br/>PM · M] --> FM[Maria Malmer Stenergard&#x3C;br/>FM · M]
     PM --> JM[Gunnar Strömmer&#x3C;br/>Justitieminister · M]
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network">🕸️ Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>Civil-society coalition</strong> (SJF + TU + Utgivarna + RSF-SE) is a coordinated campaign network specific to KU33.</li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet → KU33</strong> is the single most consequential pre-vote edge in the network.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree">🌳 Tidö Coalition Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree">🌳 Tidö Coalition Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[Tidö Coalition Stability] --> Q1{HD03232 costs&#x3C;br/>published?}
     Q1 -->|Yes, capped| P1[P breach = 0.10]
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tidö-coalition-fracture-probability-tree">🌳 Tidö Coalition Frac
 <li>Åkesson column / SR Ekot interview referencing HD03232</li>
 <li>Budget-deal negotiating posture on 2026 Vårändringsbudget</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group">📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 sentences per group)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group">📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 sentences per group)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--briefing-cards--3-sentences-per-group">📋 Briefing Cards (≤ 3 se
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>3-Sentence Briefing</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens (pro-access)</strong></td><td>Your right to access seized-material records is being narrowed by KU33. The amendment cannot take effect until post-election second reading in 2027. Contact your MP before 2026-04-22 chamber vote.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government coalition</strong></td><td>KU33 advances law-enforcement integrity; HD03231/232 delivers Ukraine-accountability legacy. King's Kyiv visit provides diplomatic signal. SD cost-resistance on HD03232 is the coalition vulnerability.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S opposition</strong></td><td>KU33 gives you a civil-liberties argument without Ukraine-aid trade-off. Second-reading veto requires post-election majority. Messaging complexity — narrow "not anti-Ukraine" framing.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V + MP opposition</strong></td><td>Grundlag-protection is your established brand. Coordinate with press-freedom coalition. Raise environmental-inspection access concern for MP.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media companies</strong></td><td>KU33 removes an investigative-journalism access channel. KU32 adds digital-accessibility compliance cost. Lagrådet yttrande is your earliest intervention window.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil society (press freedom)</strong></td><td>File coordinated remissvar. Prepare ECHR complaint draft. Engage Venice Commission through CoE channels.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International EU / CoE</strong></td><td>Watch Venice Commission engagement on KU33 Art 10 proportionality. HD03231 accession closes ICC jurisdictional gap on Russia aggression.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media &#x26; public opinion</strong></td><td>Frame the rhetorical tension (domestic narrowing vs international accountability). Royal Kyiv visit is the broadcast-friendly entry point for Ukraine; KU33 is the technical-constitutional narrative.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SCN-ID</strong>: SCN-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH on base scenarios; LOW-MEDIUM on wildcards
 <strong>Horizon Bands</strong>: 30 days · 90 days · post-September-2026 election</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-landscape-overview">🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-landscape-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-landscape-overview">🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-landscape-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     Now[2026-04-19 12:19 UTC&#x3C;br/>State: Both clusters submitted&#x3C;br/>KU33 + Ukraine package] --> D1[2026-04-22&#x3C;br/>First Reading Vote]
     D1 -->|Ja ≥ 175, SD holds| B1[Base Scenario&#x3C;br/>P = 0.55]
@@ -1262,8 +1262,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-landscape-overview">🎲 Scenario Landscape Overview<a clas
     style W1 fill:#c0392b,color:#fff</pre>
 <p>Probabilities are point estimates with a ±0.10 epistemic band. They are updated against new Lagrådet, SÄPO, and polling signals per the Bayesian procedure in <code>risk-assessment.md</code> §Bayesian Update.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-base-scenarios">🧭 Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-base-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055">Scenario A — <strong>Base Case: Orderly Dual-Track Advance</strong> (P = 0.55)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios">🧭 Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055">Scenario A — <strong>Base Case: Orderly Dual-Track Advance</strong> (P = 0.55)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: First reading of KU33 + KU32 passes 2026-04-22 with government majority (M + SD + L + KD holding). Lagrådet yttrande interprets "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" conservatively enough to neutralise the strongest civil-liberties critique. HD03231 and HD03232 are referred to UU in late April, return as a betänkande in May–June, and pass chamber with cross-party Ja (SD attaches a cost-transparency reservation to HD03232). Ukraine tribunal accession completes before summer recess. Campaign season frames KU33 as a civil-liberties vs. law-enforcement trade-off; S position remains ambiguous into August polling.</p>
 
 
@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a--base-case-orderly-dual-track-advance-p--055">Scenario A 
 <li>SOM-institute September poll shows Tidö bloc below 44% ⇒ downgrade post-election confirmation probability by 15 points</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020">Scenario B — <strong>Bull Case: Lagrådet Narrows, Ukraine Surges</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020">Scenario B — <strong>Bull Case: Lagrådet Narrows, Ukraine Surges</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande on KU33 imposes a strict, literal reading of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" — requiring formal documentation of incorporation before the carve-out attaches. This neutralises the SJF/RSF critique and lifts opposition uncertainty. Meanwhile, Ukraine propositions become a unifying national moment after the King's Kyiv visit saturates broadcast cycles. Cross-party support on HD03231 + HD03232 becomes unanimous in chamber. SD formally endorses both on Åkesson's public platform. Sweden positions as a norm-entrepreneur, attracting a follow-up invitation to host a preliminary tribunal preparatory conference.</p>
 
 
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b--bull-case-lagrådet-narrows-ukraine-surges-p--020">Scenar
 <li>Magdalena Andersson makes a public statement supporting KU33 proportionality</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020">Scenario C — <strong>Bear Case: Procedural Drag + SD Defection</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020">Scenario C — <strong>Bear Case: Procedural Drag + SD Defection</strong> (P = 0.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande is silent on the discretionary dimension of "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>," amplifying SJF/RSF criticism. Tidö coalition holds first reading vote but with &#x3C; 180 Ja votes (signalling internal fracture). SD announces a formal reservation on HD03232 cost projections, forcing a UU-committee compromise that inserts a Swedish contribution ceiling. S seizes on the KU33 ambiguity as a pre-election wedge issue. Press-freedom NGO coalition files a preemptive ECHR complaint. September election produces S-led minority government; KU33 second reading is renegotiated with a statutory (not grundlag) fallback.</p>
 
 
@@ -1369,8 +1369,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-c--bear-case-procedural-drag--sd-defection-p--020">Scenario
 <li>SOM poll shows Tidö bloc ≤ 44% combined in May/June 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact">⚡ Two Wildcards — Low-Probability / High-Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high">Wildcard W1 — <strong>Russian hybrid retaliation after HD03231 chamber vote</strong> (P = 0.04 · Impact = HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact">⚡ Two Wildcards — Low-Probability / High-Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-wildcards--low-probability--high-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high">Wildcard W1 — <strong>Russian hybrid retaliation after HD03231 chamber vote</strong> (P = 0.04 · Impact = HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p--004--impact--high"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's formal accession to the Special Tribunal for Aggression makes it the newest target of a pattern of Russian hybrid operations previously documented against Baltic and Nordic states (e.g., the 2023 SIS/SÄPO reports on Russian information ops targeting Swedish NATO discourse). Attack vectors documented in <code>threat-analysis.md</code> §4 include: (a) coordinated inauthentic behaviour amplifying KU33 "hypocrisy" framing in Swedish-language social media; (b) targeted phishing against UD officials working on tribunal accession; (c) DDoS against riksdagen.se during chamber-vote windows; (d) opportunistic diplomatic expulsion retaliation.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators to promote P from 0.04 → 0.15</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wildcard-w1--russian-hybrid-retaliation-after-hd03231-chamber-vote-p-
 <li>Russian embassy (or FSB-linked channels) public commentary naming Swedish officials</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium">Wildcard W2 — <strong>US administration withdrawal from tribunal coordination</strong> (P = 0.06 · Impact = MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium">Wildcard W2 — <strong>US administration withdrawal from tribunal coordination</strong> (P = 0.06 · Impact = MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-p--006--impact--medium"></a></h4>
 <p>The US political posture on the Special Tribunal has been ambiguous across recent transitions. A formal withdrawal from tribunal coordination, or a public statement questioning its legitimacy, would be damaging — not because US membership is required, but because it would embolden non-European participating states to disengage and would rhetorically weaken the tribunal's claim to be "the international community's" response. Sweden's accession momentum could be seen as the ceiling rather than the floor of Western commitment.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators to promote P from 0.06 → 0.20</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wildcard-w2--us-administration-withdrawal-from-tribunal-coordination-
 <li>Withdrawal of at least one non-European tribunal participant in the 30-day window</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses">🔬 ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses">🔬 ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <p>We test the question: <strong>"What is the probability KU33 second reading confirms the grundlag amendment in January 2027?"</strong></p>
 <p>Five hypotheses are weighed against six pieces of evidence (each marked Consistent <strong>C</strong> / Inconsistent <strong>I</strong> / Neutral <strong>N</strong> with the hypothesis).</p>
 
@@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses">🔬 ACH — Analysis of Comp
 <p><strong>Converted base probability</strong>: P(H2) ≈ 0.40 · P(H1) ≈ 0.25 · P(H3) ≈ 0.20 · P(H4) ≈ 0.10 · P(H5) ≈ 0.05.
 Aggregating H1 + H2 + modified confirmations gives the <code>executive-brief.md</code> second-reading confirmation forecast of <strong>≈ 0.55</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts">📅 Monitoring Trigger Calendar — Mapped to Scenario Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts">📅 Monitoring Trigger Calendar — Mapped to Scenario Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1529,14 +1529,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--monitoring-trigger-calendar--mapped-to-scenario-shifts">📅 Monitor
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Scenario Updated</th><th>New Signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>KU33 + KU32 first reading vote</td><td>A/B/C</td><td>Ja count; SD abstention pattern</td></tr><tr><td>≤ 2026-05-15</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/32</td><td>A → B or A → C</td><td>Language on "<em>formellt tillförd</em>"</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05</td><td>UU committee hearing HD03231</td><td>A</td><td>SD reservation filing</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05</td><td>UU committee hearing HD03232</td><td>A → C on cost objection</td><td>SD cost-ceiling demand</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06 (est)</td><td>Chamber vote HD03231/232</td><td>A</td><td>Cross-party Ja count</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06 to 09</td><td>Monthly SOM polling</td><td>Bayesian update on post-election P</td><td>Tidö bloc vs. opposition bloc</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Swedish general election</td><td>Terminal scenario fork</td><td>New riksdag composition</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09 → 12</td><td>Government formation</td><td>H1/H2/H3 conditional on majority</td><td>KU33 coalition arithmetic</td></tr><tr><td>2026-12 or 2027-01</td><td>KU33 second reading</td><td>TERMINAL</td><td>Confirmed / modified / rejected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-work">🔗 Cross-Reference to Upstream Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-reference-to-upstream-work"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-work">🔗 Cross-Reference to Upstream Work<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-work"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scenario continuity</strong> with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/scenario-analysis.md</code></a>: the grundlag base/bull/bear structure introduced in 1434 is retained; probabilities updated downward for base (−0.05) on the basis of HD03232 cost uncertainty emerging in 1219.</li>
 <li><strong>Post-election probability priors</strong> drawn from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/weekly-review/scenario-analysis.md</code></a> (if present) or the closest weekly-review available; divergences from weekly-review scenarios are justified in <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Probability-Alignment Audit.</li>
 <li><strong>Russia hybrid W1</strong> priors: leverage SÄPO and MUST documented post-NATO-accession hybrid posture; see <code>threat-analysis.md</code> §4 for the intelligence base.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-confidence-markers--known-limitations">⚠️ Confidence Markers &#x26; Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-confidence-markers--known-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-markers--known-limitations">⚠️ Confidence Markers &#x26; Known Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-markers--known-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Base-case probability (0.55)</strong> has a ±0.10 epistemic band — do not treat as precise.</li>
 <li><strong>Post-election conditional probabilities</strong> depend on poll-to-seat translations that are non-linear near majority boundary (around 175 seats).</li>
@@ -1546,12 +1546,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-confidence-markers--known-limitations">⚠️ Confidence Markers
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-01 (after KU33 first reading + Lagrådet yttrande) · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 6 (L3 tier) + ACH doctrine</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>RSK-ID</strong>: RSK-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: 10 risks, interconnection graph, ALARP mapping)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Parliamentary Activity 2026-04-19
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     Housing Registry Delay: [0.40, 0.60]
     Grundlag Rejection 2027: [0.85, 0.30]
     Ukraine Tribunal Stalls: [0.60, 0.35]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-risk-register">Ranked Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-risk-register">Ranked Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1646,15 +1646,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-risk-register">Ranked Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (L)</th><th>Impact (I)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Trend</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>KU33 confirmed by post-2026 riksdag</strong> — opposition wins September 2026 election and rejects second reading</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.90</td><td><strong>0.36</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Monitor election polls; alert if opposition bloc exceeds 50%</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Ukraine compensation costs exceed projections</strong> — International Compensation Commission levies exceed SEK 2bn annually</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.75</td><td><strong>0.41</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Track commission establishment milestones; fiscal provisions in spring budget</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>SD withdraws cooperation on Ukraine financing</strong> — SD voter base resistant to open-ended Ukraine financial commitments</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.80</td><td><strong>0.36</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Track SD party statements on Ukraine cost; watch Åkesson statements</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>KU33 challenged under ECHR Art 10 (free expression)</strong> — Swedish journalists union or Reporters Without Borders files complaint</td><td>0.50</td><td>0.70</td><td><strong>0.35</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Monitor Council of Europe response; track JK (Justitiekanslern) guidance</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>Housing register (CU28) delayed</strong> — Industry opposition slows implementation past Jan 2027</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.45</td><td><strong>0.18</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Monitor Lantmäteriet capacity; track industry consultation</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td><strong>Grundlag amendment rejected</strong> — September 2026 election produces majority that refuses second reading</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.85</td><td><strong>0.26</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Electoral arithmetic: requires both S and V to oppose</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td><strong>Ukraine Tribunal stalls</strong> — Geopolitical shifts reduce participation; tribunal loses jurisdiction</td><td>0.35</td><td>0.65</td><td><strong>0.23</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>Track Council of Europe participation numbers</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-analysis">Cascading Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-analysis">Cascading Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary risk chain</strong>: SD withdrawal (Risk 3) → budget deal collapse → government confidence vote → snap election → KU33 second reading fails (Risk 6) → constitutional amendment abandoned.</p>
 <p><strong>Probability of chain</strong>: P(3) × P(chain given 3) = 0.45 × 0.35 = <strong>0.16 (16%)</strong> — within planning horizon for 2026-2027.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-bayesian-update">Bayesian Update<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update">Bayesian Update<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update"></a></h3>
 <p>Prior probability (pre-session): Government stability = 0.65<br>
 New evidence: Multiple propositions passing committee, Ukraine propositions advancing = moderate positive signal<br>
 Posterior: Government stability = <strong>0.68</strong> (+0.03 update)</p>
 <p>Evidence weight: KU committees advancing government proposals without major dissent signals coalition cohesion is holding.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-by-dimension">Risk by Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-by-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-by-dimension">Risk by Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-by-dimension"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-by-dimension">Risk by Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Top Risk</th><th>Score</th><th>Time horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td>KU33 rejection in 2027</td><td>7.5/10</td><td>12-18 months</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>Ukraine cost escalation</td><td>7.0/10</td><td>24-36 months</td></tr><tr><td>Political</td><td>SD withdrawal from cooperation</td><td>6.5/10</td><td>3-9 months</td></tr><tr><td>Legal</td><td>ECHR challenge to KU33</td><td>6.0/10</td><td>6-24 months</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative</td><td>CU28 implementation delay</td><td>4.5/10</td><td>12-24 months</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks">Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks">Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks"></a></h3>
 <p>The following three additional risks complete the reference-grade register:</p>
 
 
@@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expanded-risk-register-10-risks">Expanded Risk Register (10 risks)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>8</td><td><strong>Lagrådet silent on "formellt tillförd" discretion</strong> — weak yttrande amplifies SJF/RSF critique and hardens opposition position on KU33</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center"><strong>0.27</strong></td><td>0-30 days</td><td>Monitor Lagrådet publication calendar; prepare amendment draft</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td><strong>Russian hybrid interference escalation after HD03231 chamber vote</strong> — coordinated inauthentic behaviour, phishing against UD, DDoS against riksdagen.se</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td align="center"><strong>0.30</strong></td><td>0-90 days post-vote</td><td>SÄPO liaison heightened; CERT-SE vigilance; MSB public-communication preparedness</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td><strong>US administration withdraws from tribunal coordination</strong> — public statement questioning Special Tribunal legitimacy; emboldens non-European disengagement</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center"><strong>0.16</strong></td><td>3-12 months</td><td>Diplomatic contingency with DE, FR, UK, NL; NATO/CoE escalation path</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     R3[R3 SD Withdrawal] -->|triggers| R1[R1 Election reversal&#x3C;br/>of KU33]
     R3 -->|triggers| R2[R2 Ukraine cost escalation&#x3C;br/>harder to absorb]
@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>R8 amplifies R4 and R1</strong> — a weak Lagrådet yttrande both raises ECHR challenge probability and hardens opposition second-reading stance.</li>
 <li><strong>R2 → R3 feedback loop</strong> — if HD03232 passes with tight fiscal budget, subsequent contribution increases could trigger SD withdrawal.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping">ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping">ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-alarp-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-mapping">ALARP (As Low As Reas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Current level</th><th align="center">Target level</th><th align="center">Mitigation cost</th><th align="center">Effectiveness</th><th align="center">ALARP verdict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1 KU33 election reversal</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">HIGH (coalition politics)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center"><strong>Accept</strong> — democratic design, cannot be mitigated away</td></tr><tr><td>R2 Ukraine cost escalation</td><td align="center">0.41</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (UU cost ceiling)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — attach cost cap in UU betänkande</td></tr><tr><td>R3 SD withdrawal</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (coalition renegotiation)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — transparency on HD03232 costs</td></tr><tr><td>R4 ECHR challenge</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">LOW (strict Lagrådet language)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — drive narrow "formellt tillförd" reading</td></tr><tr><td>R8 Weak Lagrådet</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">LOW (government submission quality)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce</strong> — prepare responsive memorandum</td></tr><tr><td>R9 Russian hybrid</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">HIGH (hybrid defence investment)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center"><strong>Reduce &#x26; Accept</strong> — partial</td></tr><tr><td>R10 US withdrawal</td><td align="center">0.16</td><td align="center">0.16</td><td align="center">HIGH (diplomatic capital)</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center"><strong>Accept</strong> — exogenous</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules">Bayesian Forward-Looking Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules">Bayesian Forward-Looking Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules"></a></h3>
 <p>Given a new signal at time t, update the posterior probability of each risk:</p>
 
 
@@ -1877,12 +1877,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-bayesian-forward-looking-update-rules">Bayesian Forward-Looking Updat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Effect on</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande <strong>strict</strong> on "formellt tillförd"</td><td>R4 × 0.5 · R8 × 0.3 · R1 × 0.85</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande <strong>silent / discretionary</strong></td><td>R4 × 1.5 · R8 × 1.8 · R1 × 1.2</td></tr><tr><td>SD red-line on HD03232 costs</td><td>R3 × 2.0 · R1 × 1.3 · R2 × 0.7</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO threat-level increase (hybrid)</td><td>R9 × 2.0</td></tr><tr><td>US senior-official statement questioning tribunal</td><td>R10 × 2.5</td></tr><tr><td>SOM poll Tidö bloc &#x3C; 44%</td><td>R1 × 1.5 · R3 × 1.3</td></tr><tr><td>SOM poll Tidö bloc > 50%</td><td>R1 × 0.6 · R3 × 0.8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SWT-ID</strong>: SWT-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: full TOWS matrix, cluster-specific quadrants, Mermaid mindmap retained)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping">SWOT Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping">SWOT Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-quadrant-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Swedish Parliament&#x3C;br/>April 19 2026))
     Strengths
@@ -1925,8 +1925,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-quadrant-mapping">SWOT Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="
       Ukraine Commitment vs. SD Voter Base Tension
         SD base less enthusiastic about Ukraine financial commitments
         Compensation commission funding unpredictable</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-quadrant-analysis">Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-quadrant-analysis">Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional process integrity</td><td>KU33 and KU32 both adopted as "vilande" — second reading must occur after election, ensuring democratic legitimacy</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability leadership</td><td>Sweden among ~40 states joining Special Tribunal; first European country to propose bilateral compensation framework alongside accession</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party Ukraine consensus</td><td>HD03231/232 submitted by FM Maria Malmer Stenergard (M); expected broad support from S, M, L, C, KD, and MP</td><td>HD03231</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Offentlighetsprincipen narrowing</td><td>KU33 removes seized digital materials from "allmän handling" status — a carve-out that removes presumption of publicity</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Law enforcement opacity</td><td>Critics (V, MP expected) argue carve-out is disproportionate to stated crime-fighting rationale</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Minority government dependency</td><td>Kristersson government cannot pass any legislation without SD support; SD can extract policy concessions at each vote</td><td>All docs</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ukraine norm leadership premium</td><td>Sweden positioning as credible international law-builder strengthens EU standing</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Digital modernization</td><td>CU28 national bostadsrättsregister will reduce mortgage fraud and improve market transparency</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market integrity</td><td>Identity requirements for lagfart (HD01CU27) combined with CU28 register creates anti-money-laundering layer</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2050,11 +2050,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional backsliding</td><td>KU33 is the second grundlag narrowing in current riksmöte; pattern may draw international criticism</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Election timing risk</td><td>KU33 must be confirmed by post-September 2026 riksdag; if opposition wins majority, amendment could be rejected</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation commission cost</td><td>International Compensation Commission for Ukraine may involve Swedish financial contributions not yet quantified</td><td>HD03232</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-interference-analysis">TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-analysis">TOWS Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>S1×T1 (Strength-Threat interference)</strong>: Ukraine rule-of-law leadership (S) is in tension with the constitutional narrowing (W) — Sweden cannot credibly champion international accountability while narrowing domestic transparency.</p>
 <p><strong>W1×O1 (Weakness-Opportunity interference)</strong>: If KU33 attracts Council of Europe criticism, it could undermine Sweden's Ukraine norm-leadership narrative, turning an asset into a liability.</p>
 <p><strong>O3×T3 (Opportunity-Threat interaction)</strong>: Housing market modernization creates opportunity for anti-corruption, but Ukraine compensation funding uncertainty creates fiscal pressure that could divert resources from other reforms.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-full-tows-interference-matrix">Full TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-full-tows-interference-matrix">Full TOWS Interference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-tows-interference-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>The TOWS matrix reads <em>Internal × External</em> interactions to derive strategic postures:</p>
 
 
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-full-tows-interference-matrix">Full TOWS Interference Matrix<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th><strong>Opportunities (O)</strong></th><th><strong>Threats (T)</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths (S)</strong></td><td><strong>SO — Maxi-Maxi (leverage)</strong></td><td><strong>ST — Maxi-Mini (defend)</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>S2 × O1: Royal Kyiv visit + tribunal accession = EU rule-of-law leadership premium</td><td>S1 × T1: Grundlag two-reading design is itself the defence against election-driven reversal</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>S3 × O2: Cross-party Ukraine consensus + housing modernization = coherent law-and-order narrative</td><td>S2 × T2: Ukraine norm-entrepreneurship creates reputational shield against KU33 criticism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses (W)</strong></td><td><strong>WO — Mini-Maxi (fix)</strong></td><td><strong>WT — Mini-Mini (retreat)</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>W1 × O1: Offentlighetsprincipen narrowing <em>undermines</em> rule-of-law leadership → fix via strict Lagrådet language</td><td>W1 × T1: KU33 narrowing + ECHR challenge = reputational double-hit; prepare defence memorandum</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>W3 × O3: Minority-government dependency <em>fits</em> housing-reform MoU logic — structured consultative reform</td><td>W3 × T2: SD cost resistance on HD03232 + tight fiscal space = budget-deal fragility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-specific-quadrants">Cluster-Specific Quadrants<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-specific-quadrants"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-specific-quadrants">Cluster-Specific Quadrants<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-specific-quadrants"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Cluster A — KU33 (seizure transparency)</strong></p>
 
 
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-specific-quadrants">Cluster-Specific Quadrants<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Entry</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>EU compliance trajectory (EAA 2025)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>1.2m Swedes with disabilities gain enforceable rights</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>18-month compliance gap vs. 28 Jun 2025 EAA deadline</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Constitutional anchor for future accessibility legislation</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Normalises grundlag-as-legislative-tool pattern</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence">Cross-Reference to Stakeholder Influence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence">Cross-Reference to Stakeholder Influence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT entries mapped to influence network in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §Influence Network. Key coupling:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>W1 × Opposition bloc</strong> (S, V, MP) — KU33 civil-liberties critique is the structural opposition leverage</li>
@@ -2237,13 +2237,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-stakeholder-influence">Cross-Reference to Stakehol
 <li><strong>T2 × SD Åkesson</strong> — SD cost posture is the Ukraine-package single point of failure</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>THR-ID</strong>: THR-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 3.0 (Pass 3 — reference-grade extension: Attack Tree, Diamond Model, STRIDE pass, MITRE-TTP)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[Threat Sources] --> B[Institutional Threats]
     A --> C[Political Threats]
@@ -2269,8 +2269,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style D fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style E fill:#ffbb00,color:#000
     style C fill:#ffdd44,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-6-category-threat-analysis">6-Category Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-category-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats">1. Constitutional-Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-category-threat-analysis">6-Category Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-category-threat-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats">1. Constitutional-Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>KU33 — Offentlighetsprincipen Narrowing Pattern</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: HIGH | <em>Confidence</em>: HIGH | <em>Attribution</em>: Government (Kristersson/KU majority)</p>
 <p>The KU33 betänkande proposes to remove seized digital materials from "allmän handling" status. While the stated rationale is protecting ongoing criminal investigations, the structural effect is to exempt an entire category of government-held information from the public record. This is the second grundlag carve-out in the 2025/26 riksmöte (KU32 being the first, though KU32 expands media accessibility obligations — a different vector).</p>
@@ -2283,18 +2283,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-constitutional-institutional-threats">1. Constitutional-Institution
 <li><em>Installation</em>: TF amendment takes effect January 2027</li>
 <li><em>Persistence</em>: Future governments cannot restore without new grundlag process (2+ years)</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-2-political-threats">2. Political Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-political-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-political-threats">2. Political Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-political-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>SD Cooperation Fracture Risk</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: HIGH | <em>Confidence</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: Sweden Democrats (Jimmy Åkesson)</p>
 <p>SD's support for Ukraine propositions (HD03231, HD03232) is not guaranteed. SD base voters are less enthusiastic about open-ended international financial commitments. Party leadership has been careful to frame support in national interest terms (NATO Article 5 parallel), but if cost projections for the Compensation Commission escalate, SD may signal opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: SD Deputy PM (none — SD not in government) but Tidö Agreement requires SD to "not block" certain proposals. Ukraine propositions are UU-committee matters; SD's UFöU contribution to HD01UFöU3 (NATO Finland) suggests acceptance of defence commitments but stopping short of financial pledges.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-legal-threats">3. Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-legal-threats">3. Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legal-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>ECHR Article 10 — Freedom of Expression Challenge</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Confidence</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: Journalists unions, NGOs</p>
 <p>The removal of seized materials from allmän handling status weakens press access to law enforcement materials. Investigative journalists who rely on offentlighetsprincipen to access court seizure inventories would lose this tool. A challenge under ECHR Article 10 (freedom of expression) or Article 6 (fair trial — public access) is plausible.</p>
 <p><strong>EU Directive Compliance Risk</strong>:<br>
 KU32 (media accessibility) is driven by EU's Accessibility Act and European Electronic Communications Code. Any failure to correctly transpose could trigger EU infringement proceedings.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-international-threats">4. International Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-international-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-international-threats">4. International Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-international-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Russia Hybrid Interference in Ukraine Accountability Process</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: HIGH | <em>Confidence</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: Russian government, proxies</p>
 <p>As Sweden formally accedes to both the Special Tribunal (HD03231) and Compensation Commission (HD03232), it becomes a target for Russian information operations designed to delegitimize these institutions. The King's visit to Kyiv (2026-04-17) provides symbolic ammunition for Russian narratives about Swedish "regime change" pressure.</p>
@@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-international-threats">4. International Threats<a class="" aria-hid
 <li>T1583.002 — DNS Server: Information manipulation targeting Swedish media covering Ukraine tribunal</li>
 <li>T1566 — Phishing: Target Swedish Foreign Ministry officials working on tribunal accession</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-5-democratic-norm-threats">5. Democratic Norm Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-democratic-norm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-democratic-norm-threats">5. Democratic Norm Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-democratic-norm-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Offentlighetsprincipen Erosion Pattern</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: CRITICAL | <em>Confidence</em>: HIGH | <em>Attribution</em>: Systemic — not attributed to single actor</p>
 <p>The combination of KU32 and KU33 in the same riksmöte represents a pattern of incremental grundlag modification. Each individual change may be justified; the cumulative effect is a narrowing of constitutional freedoms of information. From a democratic norm perspective, the most significant threat is normalizing the grundlag amendment process as a tool for routine policy adjustments.</p>
@@ -2350,13 +2350,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-democratic-norm-threats">5. Democratic Norm Threats<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Current Status</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 chamber vote</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Minority opposition fails → amendment passes</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>Election outcome</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Opposition bloc wins → KU33 risks rejection</td><td>Voters</td><td>2026-09</td></tr><tr><td>Second KU33 reading</td><td>January 2027</td><td>Requires same wording post-election</td><td>New Riksdag</td><td>2027-01</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR timeline</td><td>Not yet filed</td><td>Filing → formal ECHR review</td><td>Journalists union</td><td>TBD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-6-economic-threats">6. Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-economic-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-economic-threats">6. Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-economic-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Ukraine Compensation Commission Financial Exposure</strong><br>
 <em>Severity</em>: MEDIUM | <em>Confidence</em>: LOW-MEDIUM | <em>Attribution</em>: International fiscal commitments</p>
 <p>HD03232 commits Sweden to the Convention establishing the International Compensation Commission for Ukraine. The Commission's operating model and Swedish contribution level are not yet specified in the proposition. If Sweden's contribution is proportional to GDP (as is common in international treaty financing), the annual cost could reach SEK 500m-2bn — material against the backdrop of the Spring Supplementary Budget (HD0399) showing tight fiscal space.</p>
 <p><strong>Forward Scenario</strong>: The Compensation Commission begins operations 2026-2027. Russia refuses to participate. The Commission pursues Russian frozen assets held in European jurisdictions. Sweden as a member state of the treaty has obligations to support enforcement — potentially creating tensions with trade and financial sector.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain">🌲 Attack Tree — KU33 Transparency Degradation Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain">🌲 Attack Tree — KU33 Transparency Degradation Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[ATTACK GOAL:&#x3C;br/>Permanently narrow offentlighetsprincipen&#x3C;br/>via grundlag]
     ROOT --> A1[Step 1: Frame as&#x3C;br/>proportionate reform]
@@ -2390,7 +2390,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-transparency-degradation-chain">🌲 Attack Tree 
 <li>A4 — mobilise press-freedom as electoral issue</li>
 <li>A5 — negotiate modified text post-election (Scenario C pathway)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Interference Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231">💎 Diamond Model — Russian Hybrid Interference Against HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diamond-model--russian-hybrid-interference-against-hd03231">💎 Dia
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Vertex</th><th>Content</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Adversary</strong></td><td>Russian state + affiliated proxies (GRU Unit 29155, FSB CIO, RT/Sputnik, commercial IO vendors)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Infrastructure</strong></td><td>Baltic-proximate server farms; coordinated inauthentic accounts on X/Telegram/VK; cryptocurrency-funded ad buys</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Capability</strong></td><td>T1583 (Acquire Infrastructure), T1566 (Phishing), T1071 (Application Layer C2), T1491 (Defacement), T1588 (Obtain Capabilities), T1498 (Network Denial of Service)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Victim</strong></td><td>Swedish MFA / UD personnel working on HD03231 · Riksdag infrastructure (riksdagen.se chamber-vote endpoints) · Swedish-language public-discourse space on HD03231</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Socio-political meta</strong></td><td>Weaponising the KU33-vs-Ukraine "hypocrisy" framing; amplifying SD cost objections; targeting Magdalena Andersson posture ambiguity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Technology meta</strong></td><td>AI-generated deepfake content capacity rising; LLM-driven content farms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Event pivot</strong></td><td>2026-04-22 first-reading vote; Q2 2026 chamber vote on HD03231</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface">🔐 STRIDE Pass — Sweden's Ukraine-Tribunal Engagement Surface<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface">🔐 STRIDE Pass — Sweden's Ukraine-Tribunal Engagement Surface<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2478,7 +2478,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stride-pass--swedens-ukraine-tribunal-engagement-surface">🔐 STRID
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>STRIDE</th><th>Threat</th><th>Target</th><th align="center">Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Fake Swedish diplomatic cables to Kyiv during King's visit</td><td>UD comms infrastructure</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Altered riksdagen.se votum records post-chamber vote</td><td>Riksdag IT</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Non-attributable "civil-society" campaigns questioning tribunal</td><td>Swedish public sphere</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I</strong>nformation disclosure</td><td>KU33 creates info-gap; adversary exploits lack of public oversight</td><td>Offentlighetsprincipen carve-out</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>D</strong>enial of Service</td><td>DDoS against riksdagen.se during 2026-04-22 and HD03231 vote</td><td>Riksdag public-facing systems</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>E</strong>levation of privilege</td><td>Phishing-enabled access to UD personnel working on tribunal</td><td>UD endpoints</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context">🎯 MITRE-TTP Mapping (adapted to political-threat context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context">🎯 MITRE-TTP Mapping (adapted to political-threat context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2530,7 +2530,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--mitre-ttp-mapping-adapted-to-political-threat-context">🎯 MITRE-TT
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Technique</th><th>Expected use against SE post-HD03231</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1583.001</td><td>Acquire Infrastructure: Domains</td><td>Typosquat domains targeting UD + Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td>T1566.002</td><td>Phishing: Spearphishing Link</td><td>Target UD tribunal team</td></tr><tr><td>T1598</td><td>Phishing for Information</td><td>Harvest UD personnel credentials</td></tr><tr><td>T1588.006</td><td>Obtain Capabilities: Vulnerabilities</td><td>Pre-positioned exploit capability against Riksdag IT</td></tr><tr><td>T1498.001</td><td>Network Denial of Service: Direct</td><td>Chamber-vote-day DDoS</td></tr><tr><td>T1491.002</td><td>Defacement: External</td><td>riksdagen.se compromise attempt</td></tr><tr><td>T1583.002</td><td>Acquire Infrastructure: DNS Server</td><td>Content manipulation for Swedish-language Ukraine coverage</td></tr><tr><td>T1189</td><td>Drive-by Compromise</td><td>Target Swedish journalist community covering KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6">📊 Threat-Indicator Library (consolidated across §§ 1-6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6">📊 Threat-Indicator Library (consolidated across §§ 1-6)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2616,14 +2616,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-indicator-library-consolidated-across--1-6">📊 Threat-Indic
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Status</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Deadline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 chamber vote</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Ja-vote minority fails → amendment passes</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>KU32 chamber vote</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Same window</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td>Pending</td><td>Language on "formellt tillförd"</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 UU referral</td><td>Expected late April</td><td>Committee chair appointment</td><td>UU</td><td>≤ 2026-05-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 UU referral</td><td>Expected late April</td><td>SD cost reservation filing</td><td>UU</td><td>≤ 2026-05-15</td></tr><tr><td>Election outcome</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Opposition bloc wins → KU33 risks rejection</td><td>Voters</td><td>2026-09</td></tr><tr><td>Second KU33 reading</td><td>January 2027</td><td>Requires same wording post-election</td><td>New Riksdag</td><td>2027-01</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR timeline</td><td>Not yet filed</td><td>Filing → formal ECHR review</td><td>Journalists union</td><td>TBD</td></tr><tr><td>SÄPO threat-level bulletins</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Any public adjustment mentioning tribunal</td><td>SÄPO</td><td>Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>SOM poll Tidö bloc</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Bloc &#x3C; 44% or > 50% triggers Bayesian update</td><td>SOM Institute</td><td>Monthly</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU32<br>
 <strong>Depth Tier</strong>: L2+ (P0 Constitutional)<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17<br>
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identity">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2666,17 +2666,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-identity">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Betänkande (committee report)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Beteckning</strong></td><td>2025/26:KU32</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional texts</strong></td><td>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) + Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>First reading</strong></td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22 chamber debate (same day as KU33)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Effect date</strong></td><td>1 January 2027 (if confirmed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU driver</strong></td><td>European Accessibility Act (Directive 2019/882) + EECC</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>KU32 amends both TF and YGL to allow broader accessibility requirements to be imposed by ordinary law on constitutionally protected media products. Currently, TF and YGL shield products like e-books, streaming services, and digital publications from certain requirements — including accessibility mandates — because imposing such requirements would require constitutional authority. KU32 creates that constitutional authority, enabling Sweden to fully comply with the EU's Accessibility Act.</p>
 <p>This is a less controversial constitutional amendment than KU33 — it expands the ability to impose accessibility standards on media rather than restricting public access rights. However, the simultaneous passage of KU32 and KU33 in the same riksmöte establishes a pattern of constitutional amendment as routine legislative tool that warrants monitoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-policy-changes">Key Policy Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-policy-changes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-policy-changes">Key Policy Changes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-policy-changes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>E-books and digital content</strong>: Accessibility requirements (screen reader compatibility, alt text, captioning) can now be mandated by ordinary law for TF/YGL-protected digital content</li>
 <li><strong>E-commerce services</strong>: Accessibility standards for digital shopping platforms with media components</li>
 <li><strong>Vidaresändning</strong> (must-carry broadcasting): Accessibility services (subtitling, audio description) must be carried beyond just public service broadcasters</li>
 <li><strong>Advertising and product information</strong>: Packaging information requirements can be expanded under ordinary law</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific">SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific">SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-summary-ku32-specific">SWOT Summary (KU32-specific)<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SWOT</th><th>Entry</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>EU compliance — avoids infringement proceedings</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Enables meaningful accessibility for disabled persons</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Constitutional modification for EU compliance sets precedent</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Digital inclusion for 1.2m Swedes with disabilities</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Media industry compliance costs</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Two grundlag amendments in one riksmöte — normalizes process</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors">Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors">Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2750,7 +2750,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors">Named Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Stance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ann-Sofie Alm</td><td>KU chair (M)</td><td>PROPOSE adoption</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>External driver</td><td>Accessibility Act compliance</td></tr><tr><td>Funktionstillgänglighet</td><td>Disability organizations</td><td>SUPPORT</td></tr><tr><td>Media sector (TV4, SVT)</td><td>Compliance obligation</td><td>NEUTRAL/CONCERNED about costs</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2778,14 +2778,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Chamber vote KU32</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Simultaneous with KU33</td></tr><tr><td>Second reading</td><td>Post-election 2027</td><td>Same timeline as KU33</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation regulation</td><td>2026 H2</td><td>Ordinary law requirements under new constitutional authority</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU33<br>
 <strong>Depth Tier</strong>: L3 (P0 Constitutional)<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17<br>
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched — full L3 content)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identity-1">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-1">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2840,21 +2840,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-identity-1">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Betänkande (committee report)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Beteckning</strong></td><td>2025/26:KU33</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Underlying prop</strong></td><td>Government proposition (KU recommends adoption)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>First reading</strong></td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22 chamber debate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Second reading</strong></td><td>Required after September 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Effect date</strong></td><td>1 January 2027 (if confirmed)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional text</strong></td><td>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) — fundamental law</td></tr><tr><td><strong>URL</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33.html</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-two-paragraph-significance">Two-Paragraph Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-paragraph-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-two-paragraph-significance">Two-Paragraph Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-paragraph-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>KU33 proposes a targeted but constitutionally significant amendment to Sweden's Tryckfrihetsförordningen: digital materials seized or copied during police raids — husrannsakan — would no longer automatically qualify as "allmänna handlingar" (public documents). The current rule means that once material enters a government authority's possession, it presumptively becomes public. KU33 creates an exception for law enforcement seizure contexts, preventing journalists and citizens from requesting access to seized materials during active investigations.</p>
 <p>The democratic significance exceeds the narrow legal description. Offentlighetsprincipen — Sweden's 250-year-old public access framework — has been eroded incrementally over recent decades, with each exception justified as proportionate and limited. KU33's carve-out follows the same logic. But constitutional changes of this kind require two riksdag votes separated by an election, precisely because the founders understood that no single legislative majority should be able to permanently narrow fundamental freedoms. The real question is whether the post-September 2026 riksdag will confirm what the current one initiates.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-analysis">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-historical-context">Lens 1: Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-historical-context"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-analysis">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-historical-context">Lens 1: Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-historical-context"></a></h4>
 <p>Offentlighetsprincipen dates to the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766 — the world's first. Sweden pioneered public access to government records as a constitutional right. Each amendment to TF carries symbolic weight far exceeding its technical scope. KU33 is the 27th or 28th amendment to TF since it was incorporated into the constitutional framework; however, most prior amendments expanded rights (EU compliance, digital formats). This amendment restricts.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact">Lens 2: Legal-Constitutional Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact">Lens 2: Legal-Constitutional Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-legal-constitutional-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>The amendment removes seized digital materials from the definition of "allmän handling" during: (a) law enforcement investigations, (b) upon transfer of information-bearing devices to authorities, and (c) when an authority takes over custody of seized copying-derived data. The carve-out ends when material is "tillförd en utredning" (incorporated into a formal investigation file) — at that point, normal public access rules resume. Critics note that defining when material is "incorporated" into an investigation file is discretionary, creating enforcement ambiguity.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>For the Kristersson government, KU33 advances the law enforcement agenda consistent with HD03246 (juvenile justice), HD03233 (telecoms fraud), and HD01SfU22 (immigration enforcement). The government is constructing a comprehensive crime-fighting narrative ahead of September 2026 elections. Restricting seizure transparency is framed as protecting ongoing investigations, not restricting press.</p>
 <p>For the opposition, KU33 creates a civil liberties argument without risking the nuclear option of blocking Ukraine propositions. S can oppose KU33 while supporting Ukraine — this is a useful positioning move for Magdalena Andersson ahead of the election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Press Freedom Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Press Freedom Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--press-freedom-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>The Swedish Union of Journalists (SJF) and major media organizations will oppose KU33. Investigative journalism in Sweden regularly uses offentlighetsprincipen to access police seizure inventories — for example, in reporting on organized crime asset seizures, corruption investigations, and environmental violations. The exemption removes this tool for the critical period when seized information is most newsworthy.</p>
 <p><strong>Named actors at risk</strong>: TT (Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå), DN investigations unit, SVT Granskar, SR Ekot investigative journalists all use seizure-related public record requests.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-election-implications">Lens 5: Election Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-election-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-election-implications">Lens 5: Election Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-election-implications"></a></h4>
 <p>KU33's fate hinges on the September 2026 election. Current polling (Tidö coalition ≈ 48%) suggests the coalition could lose its working majority. If S+V+MP+MP elect a new government, they could reject the second reading — but only if they have the will to do so. S has historically been cautious about being seen as opposing law enforcement. V and MP would push for rejection.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral risk matrix</strong>:</p>
 
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-election-implications">Lens 5: Election Implications<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Probability</th><th>KU33 outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition wins majority</td><td>35%</td><td>Confirmed — TF amended Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td>S leads minority government</td><td>40%</td><td>S negotiates — likely confirms with modifications</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP majority</td><td>25%</td><td>Likely rejected — second reading fails</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking"></a></h4>
 <p>How do comparable democracies handle law enforcement seizure transparency?</p>
 
 
@@ -2926,7 +2926,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking">Lens 6: International Benchmarking
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Approach</th><th>Comparison</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Investigative secrets protected under §406e StPO; no constitutional right to access</td><td>More restrictive than Swedish baseline; KU33 moves Sweden toward German model</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Forvaltningsloven § 24 allows exemption for investigations</td><td>Similar trajectory; DK has had this exemption for decades</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>JulkL 24 § excludes investigation materials — permanent exemption</td><td>Finland has always been more restrictive; Sweden moving in Finnish direction</td></tr><tr><td>UK</td><td>FOIA 2000 s.30 exempts investigations</td><td>Long-established exemption; UK model justifies Swedish direction</td></tr><tr><td>Canada</td><td>Privacy Act exempts police investigations</td><td>Similar to proposed Swedish position</td></tr><tr><td>Council of Europe</td><td>ECHR Art 10 requires proportionality test</td><td>KU33 must pass proportionality — Sweden's legal advisors will need to defend</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-table-ku33-specific">SWOT Table (KU33-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table-ku33-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-table-ku33-specific">SWOT Table (KU33-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table-ku33-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2975,7 +2975,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-table-ku33-specific">SWOT Table (KU33-specific)<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SWOT</th><th>Entry</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>Protects active investigations from interference</td><td>Law enforcement need to complete investigations without evidence being signalled via public access</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Narrows 250-year constitutional freedom</td><td>TF has stood since 1766; this removes a category of access rights</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Creates discretionary "incorporation" determination</td><td>When material is "incorporated into investigation" is undefined and discretionary</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Models successful approach used by Germany, UK, Finland</td><td>International precedent supports proportionate exemption</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>ECHR Article 10 challenge</td><td>Journalists union likely to pursue European Court route</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Election-dependent: uncertain second reading</td><td>If S+V+MP win September 2026, second reading may fail</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actor-table">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actor-table">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3042,7 +3042,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actor-table">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Institution</th><th>Stance</th><th>Influence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ulf Kristersson</td><td>PM (M)</td><td>Proposer</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer</td><td>Justice Minister (M)</td><td>Strong advocate</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Andreas Norlén</td><td>Speaker/former KU</td><td>Overseer</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Erik Nymansson</td><td>Chefsjustitieombudsman</td><td>Implementing authority</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>SJF (Journalist Union)</td><td>Civil society</td><td>STRONGLY OPPOSE</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>TT</td><td>News agency</td><td>OPPOSE</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Magdalena Andersson</td><td>S party leader</td><td>LIKELY OPPOSE (election calculation)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Jonas Sjöstedt-era V</td><td>Vänsterpartiet</td><td>STRONGLY OPPOSE</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Ann-Sofie Alm</td><td>KU chair (M)</td><td>PROPOSE adoption</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-library">Indicator Library<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-library"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-library">Indicator Library<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-library"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3098,19 +3098,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-library">Indicator Library<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Status</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Owner</th><th>Deadline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Chamber vote KU33</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-22</td><td>Vote outcome → adoption as vilande</td><td>KU/kammarkansliet</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet opinion</td><td>Published</td><td>Proportionality determination</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Pre-vote</td></tr><tr><td>SJF public statement</td><td>Expected</td><td>Press freedom lobbying begins</td><td>SJF</td><td>Post-debate</td></tr><tr><td>Election result</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Determines second reading outcome</td><td>Voters</td><td>2026-09</td></tr><tr><td>Second reading vote</td><td>January 2027</td><td>Final constitutional decision</td><td>New riksdag</td><td>2027-01</td></tr><tr><td>TF amendment gazette</td><td>Jan 2027 if confirmed</td><td>SFS publication</td><td>Riksdag</td><td>2027-01-01</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-critique">Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-critique">Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Steelman for KU33</em>: The argument that ongoing criminal investigations require protection from evidence-alerting via FOIA-style requests is well-established in virtually every comparable democracy. A criminal suspect whose assets are being seized should not be able to use offentlighetsprincipen to learn what the police have taken before the investigation is complete. The amendment is carefully scoped — material reverts to public access once incorporated into the investigation file.</p>
 <p><em>Counter to steelman</em>: The existing law already has exceptions for ongoing investigations (sekretesslagen § 18 chap). KU33 adds a constitutional (not statutory) exemption, which is harder to reverse and broader in principle. The additional layer of constitutional protection is not needed to achieve the stated law enforcement goal — a statutory amendment would suffice and would be easier to calibrate and reverse.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: The law enforcement rationale is legitimate, but the constitutional (rather than statutory) implementation is disproportionate and sets a dangerous precedent for grundlag modification as a routine policy tool.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231-hd03232-ukraine">HD03231-HD03232-ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231-hd03232-ukraine"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_ids</strong>: HD03231, HD03232<br>
 <strong>Depth Tier</strong>: L2+ (P1 Critical — International Treaty)<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-16<br>
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Utrikesdepartementet<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identity-2">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-2">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3157,30 +3157,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-identity-2">Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>HD03231</th><th>HD03232</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Sveriges anslutning till den utvidgade partiella överenskommelsen för den särskilda tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till konventionen om inrättande av en internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type</strong></td><td>Proposition (prop 2025/26:231)</td><td>Proposition (prop 2025/26:232)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee referral</strong></td><td>UU (Utrikesutskottet)</td><td>UU (Utrikesutskottet)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Signatory PM</strong></td><td>Ulf Kristersson</td><td>Ulf Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Signatory FM</strong></td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag URL</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231</a></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Diplomatic context</strong></td><td>King Carl Gustaf + FM visited Ukraine 2026-04-17</td><td>Same diplomatic mission</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-combined-significance-paragraph">Combined Significance Paragraph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-combined-significance-paragraph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-combined-significance-paragraph">Combined Significance Paragraph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-combined-significance-paragraph"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden is simultaneously acceding to two international legal instruments creating unprecedented accountability mechanisms for the Russia-Ukraine war. HD03231 joins Sweden to the "Expanded Partial Agreement" establishing the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine — designed to prosecute the political and military leaders responsible for Russia's February 2022 full-scale invasion, whom the International Criminal Court cannot reach because Russia is not an ICC member for this purpose. HD03232 accedes to the Convention establishing an International Compensation Commission for Ukraine, designed to ensure victims of Russian aggression receive reparations from Russian frozen assets held in European jurisdictions.</p>
 <p>Combined, these two propositions represent Sweden's most significant contribution to the international rule-of-law response to the Ukraine war since Sweden's NATO accession in 2024. The timing — submitted to Riksdag on April 16 and published the same day as the King of Sweden and FM Malmer Stenergard's visit to Kyiv — was deliberate diplomatic signalling.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-analysis-1">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-international-law-significance">Lens 1: International Law Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-international-law-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-analysis-1">6-Lens Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-analysis-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-international-law-significance">Lens 1: International Law Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-international-law-significance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)</strong>:<br>
 The crime of aggression — the "supreme international crime" in the words of the Nuremberg Tribunal — has historically been the hardest to prosecute. The ICC Kampala Amendment (2010) gave the ICC jurisdiction over aggression, but Russia is not a member, and the ICC cannot exercise jurisdiction over nationals of non-member states for this crime. The Special Tribunal closes this gap with a hybrid international-national mechanism. Sweden's accession joins approximately 40 states (as of April 2026) supporting the tribunal.</p>
 <p><strong>Compensation Commission (HD03232)</strong>:<br>
 The Convention on the International Register of Damage and the Compensation Commission represents the financial accountability dimension. Approximately €260bn in Russian sovereign assets are held frozen in European financial institutions (primarily Euroclear in Belgium). The Commission's mandate is to create a legal pathway for using these assets to compensate Ukrainian victims. Swedish accession strengthens the international legal basis for this asset mobilization.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context">Lens 2: Diplomatic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context">Lens 2: Diplomatic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-diplomatic-context"></a></h4>
 <p>The timing of the propositions (April 16) and the King's Kyiv visit (April 17) is explicitly coordinated. H.M. King Carl Gustaf's presence in Kyiv alongside FM Malmer Stenergard sends the strongest possible diplomatic signal: Sweden's head of state endorses the accountability framework being submitted to the Riksdag.</p>
 <p>This is the second time a sitting Swedish monarch has made a major foreign policy statement through a diplomatic visit — previous precedent was Carl Gustaf's Washington visit during Sweden's NATO accession process. The royal dimension elevates both propositions to a level of national commitment that transcends partisan politics.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1">Lens 3: Political-Strategic Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-political-strategic-impact-1"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>For the Kristersson government</strong>: This is a legacy achievement. PM Kristersson has consistently positioned Sweden as a strong Ukraine ally; these propositions deliver concrete legal instruments beyond military aid. They also give the government a strong foreign policy argument heading into the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>For SD</strong>: Sweden Democrats have generally supported Ukraine aid but remain watchful about cost. The Compensation Commission (HD03232) has uncertain Swedish financial obligations. SD's cooperation in UU committee will be crucial. Jimmy Åkesson has publicly supported Ukraine's sovereignty but consistently sought to limit open-ended financial exposure.</p>
 <p><strong>For the opposition</strong>: S, V, C, L all strongly support Ukraine accountability. V's historic opposition to NATO has been paused in the context of Ukraine solidarity. MP supports both propositions. This creates a rare all-party moment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics">Lens 4: Coalition and Stakeholder Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics">Lens 4: Coalition and Stakeholder Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-coalition-and-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>UU committee composition</strong>: UU will handle both propositions. The committee is chaired by a government-aligned member. Cross-party support is expected to be broad. Watch for SD reservations specifically on HD03232 cost dimensions.</p>
 <p><strong>NGO support</strong>: Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, FIDH, and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court all support both instruments. Their domestic Swedish advocacy will reinforce the broad coalition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations">Lens 5: Economic &#x26; Fiscal Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations">Lens 5: Economic &#x26; Fiscal Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-economic--fiscal-considerations"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>HD03232 financial implications</strong>: The Compensation Commission needs operating budget and Swedish contribution. EU member states' contributions are typically GDP-proportional. Sweden's GDP is approximately SEK 7.5 trillion; if Swedish contribution is 2-3% of Commission operating costs, annual exposure could be SEK 50-200m for administration — manageable. The larger question is potential Swedish liability if Russian assets in Swedish jurisdiction are mobilized for compensation payments.</p>
 <p><strong>Frozen assets in Sweden</strong>: Riksbanken and Swedish commercial banks hold some Russian sovereign assets, though the major Euroclear positions are Belgian. Sweden would need to adapt domestic legislation (separate from these propositions) to enable asset mobilization.</p>
 <p><strong>GDP context</strong>: Sweden's 0.82% growth in 2024 (recovering from -0.20% in 2023) and falling inflation (2.84% in 2024 vs 8.55% in 2023) provide a stable but not abundant fiscal backdrop. Finance Minister Svantesson has room for Ukraine commitments but not unlimited room.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1">Lens 6: International Benchmarking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3247,7 +3247,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-international-benchmarking-1">Lens 6: International Benchmarki
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Tribunal</th><th>Compensation Commission</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>EU leader in both instruments</td></tr><tr><td>France</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Strong support, Macron initiative</td></tr><tr><td>UK</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Post-Brexit still engaged</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Nordic solidarity</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>NATO partner, strong Ukraine support</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Nordic pattern</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>Member</td><td>Member</td><td>Host of ICC; natural jurisdiction</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>Acceding</td><td>Acceding</td><td>HD03231/HD03232 completing accession</td></tr><tr><td>USA</td><td>Observer</td><td>Non-member</td><td>Biden admin supported; Trump posture unclear</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-table">SWOT Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-table">SWOT Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3308,7 +3308,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-table">SWOT Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SWOT</th><th>Entry</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>Cross-party political consensus</td><td>All 8 parties support Ukraine; V/MP despite historic NATO skepticism</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Royal diplomatic reinforcement</td><td>King Carl Gustaf's Kyiv visit elevates commitment</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>SD cost resistance</td><td>SD base skeptical of open-ended financial obligations</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>Financial exposure uncertain</td><td>HD03232 contribution calculation not yet specified</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>EU rule-of-law leadership</td><td>Sweden positions as norm-entrepreneur alongside Germany, France</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>Russian asset mobilization legal foundation</td><td>HD03232 creates legal basis for compensation payments</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Russian information operations</td><td>Sweden becomes target for hybrid interference</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>Geopolitical reversal risk</td><td>If US-Russia settlement bypasses tribunal framework</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actor-table-1">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actor-table-1">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actor-table-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3376,7 +3376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actor-table-1">Named Actor Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Stance</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>FM (M), proposition signer</td><td>CHAMPION</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Ulf Kristersson</td><td>PM (M), proposition signer</td><td>STRONG SUPPORT</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>King Carl Gustaf</td><td>Swedish head of state</td><td>Diplomatic signal via Kyiv visit</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Jimmy Åkesson</td><td>SD party leader</td><td>Cautious support, watching costs</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Magdalena Andersson</td><td>S party leader</td><td>STRONG SUPPORT</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Nooshi Dadgostar</td><td>V party leader</td><td>SUPPORT</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Per Bolund</td><td>MP party leader</td><td>STRONG SUPPORT</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Andreas Norlén</td><td>Riksdag Speaker</td><td>Process facilitator</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>UU Committee Chair</td><td>Committee processing</td><td>SUPPORTIVE</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CMP-ID</strong>: CMP-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
@@ -3384,7 +3384,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Benchmarks KU33 (seizure transparency), KU32 (accessibility), and HD03231 + HD03232 (Ukraine accountability) against ≥ 5 comparator jurisdictions per cluster
 <strong>Data sources</strong>: Council of Europe (Venice Commission, ECHR), RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025, OECD Open Government Index, Euroclear public disclosures, Eurostat, World Bank, national statutes</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--jurisdiction-panel">🌍 Jurisdiction Panel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--jurisdiction-panel"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-jurisdiction-panel">🌍 Jurisdiction Panel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-panel"></a></h3>
 <p>The panel is constructed per cluster:</p>
 
 
@@ -3413,8 +3413,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--jurisdiction-panel">🌍 Jurisdiction Panel<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Jurisdiction Panel</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>KU33</strong> (seizure transparency)</td><td>🇩🇪 DE · 🇫🇮 FI · 🇩🇰 DK · 🇳🇴 NO · 🇬🇧 UK · 🇳🇱 NL · 🇨🇦 CA · CoE / ECHR</td><td>Nordic baseline + Germanic civil-law + Anglo FOIA + CoE oversight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU32</strong> (accessibility)</td><td>🇪🇺 EU (Directive 2019/882) · 🇩🇪 DE · 🇫🇷 FR · 🇮🇪 IE · 🇩🇰 DK · 🇫🇮 FI · 🇺🇸 US (ADA Title III)</td><td>EU baseline + national transpositions + US extraterritorial reference</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03231/232</strong> (Ukraine tribunal + compensation)</td><td>🇳🇱 NL · 🇩🇪 DE · 🇫🇷 FR · 🇬🇧 UK · 🇳🇴 NO · 🇫🇮 FI · 🇩🇰 DK · 🇵🇱 PL · 🇺🇸 US · CoE</td><td>ICC host + G7/EU core + Nordic cluster + front-line Ukraine neighbour</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen">🏛️ Cluster 1 — KU33: Seizure Transparency &#x26; Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen">🏛️ Cluster 1 — KU33: Seizure Transparency &#x26; Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1--ku33-seizure-transparency--offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3509,7 +3509,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Legal regime</th><th align="center">Presumption of access to seized digital material</th><th>Exemption mechanism</th><th>When exemption ends</th><th>Sweden relative posture</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SE — Sweden (current)</strong></td><td>TF 1766 + OSL 2009:400 + RB 27 kap.</td><td align="center">Presumption of public access; sekretesslagen §18 kap. allows temporary exemption</td><td>Statutory secrecy (sekretess) during active investigation</td><td>Case closed or material filed</td><td>Baseline (pre-KU33)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SE — Sweden (KU33 if confirmed)</strong></td><td>TF amended</td><td align="center"><strong>No presumption</strong> until "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>"</td><td><strong>Constitutional</strong> carve-out</td><td>Formal incorporation into investigation file</td><td>Proposed shift toward DE/FI model</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE — Germany</strong></td><td>StPO §406e · IFG 2005</td><td align="center">No presumption; investigation files secret by default</td><td>StGB §353b; StPO §406e only grants <em>Akteneinsicht</em> to parties</td><td>When investigation closes and file is released</td><td>More restrictive than Swedish baseline; KU33 moves Sweden toward German model</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI — Finland</strong></td><td>Julkisuuslaki 621/1999 §24 + Förundersökningslagen</td><td align="center">Permanent exemption for ongoing investigation materials</td><td>§24 permanent (not time-limited)</td><td>Case closed, with balancing</td><td>Finland stricter than Sweden — Sweden converging on Finnish baseline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 DK — Denmark</strong></td><td>Offentlighedsloven 2013 §27 + Retsplejeloven</td><td align="center">No presumption during investigation</td><td>§27 categorical investigation exemption</td><td>Case closed</td><td>Similar to post-KU33 Swedish posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 NO — Norway</strong></td><td>Offentlighetsloven 2006 §24</td><td align="center">Conditional presumption; §24 blanket exemption for investigation materials</td><td>§24 investigation-material carve-out</td><td>Case closure + review</td><td>Norway has had KU33-equivalent since 2006</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇬🇧 UK — United Kingdom</strong></td><td>FOIA 2000 s.30 + PACE 1984</td><td align="center">No presumption; s.30 exempts information relating to investigations</td><td>Categorical investigation exemption</td><td>Not time-limited; balance-of-public-interest test</td><td>Long-established exemption; UK posture validates Swedish direction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 NL — Netherlands</strong></td><td>Wet open overheid 2022 + Wetboek van Strafvordering</td><td align="center">Conditional presumption with broad investigation carve-out</td><td>§5.1 investigation exemption</td><td>Investigation closed</td><td>Similar to UK/DK; Swedish KU33 aligns with NL</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇨🇦 CA — Canada</strong></td><td>Privacy Act s.22 + Access to Information Act</td><td align="center">Categorical exemption for law-enforcement investigations</td><td>Investigation exemption s.22(1)(b)</td><td>Investigation ended or 20 years</td><td>Common-law default; SE/KU33 converges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🌍 CoE / ECHR</strong></td><td>ECHR Art 10 · Art 6 · Art 8</td><td align="center">Proportionality test required for any press-freedom restriction</td><td><em>Bladet Tromsø v Norway</em> · <em>Sürek v Turkey</em> line</td><td>Case-by-case</td><td><strong>Sweden KU33 must survive Art 10 proportionality review — Venice Commission likely to opine</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3532,7 +3532,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges">Where Sweden <strong>innovat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stance</th><th>Detail</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>By adopting a seizure-material carve-out, Sweden aligns with DE/FI/DK/NO/UK/CA — the restrictive-default Nordic and Germanic pattern.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Diverges</strong></td><td>Sweden is the only state implementing the carve-out via <strong>constitutional amendment</strong> (grundlag), not statutory. DE/FI/DK/NO/UK all use ordinary law. This makes Sweden's reform <strong>harder to reverse</strong> and sets a precedent for grundlag as a routine legislative tool. <code>[HIGH confidence]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Innovates</strong> (negative connotation)</td><td>The "<em>formellt tillförd bevisning</em>" trigger is <strong>novel</strong> in European practice — comparator jurisdictions use categorical investigation-closed triggers. The interpretive ambiguity is unique to the Swedish proposal.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-press-freedom-scoring-context">Press-freedom scoring context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-scoring-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-press-freedom-scoring-context">Press-freedom scoring context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-freedom-scoring-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3586,8 +3586,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-press-freedom-scoring-context">Press-freedom scoring context<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th align="center">RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025</th><th align="center">Trend</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇳🇴 NO</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 DK</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇸🇪 SE (current)</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 FI</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">→</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 NL</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">↗</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 DE</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">↘</td></tr><tr><td>🇬🇧 UK</td><td align="center">23</td><td align="center">↘</td></tr><tr><td>🇨🇦 CA</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">↘</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: Sweden currently holds #3 globally. Constitutional narrowing at this altitude is visible internationally; any ECHR challenge from SJF/TU/Utgivarna/RSF-SE will be high-profile.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment">🎛️ Cluster 2 — KU32: Accessibility (TF + YGL Amendment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark-1">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment">🎛️ Cluster 2 — KU32: Accessibility (TF + YGL Amendment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2--ku32-accessibility-tf--ygl-amendment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark-1">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3657,7 +3657,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark-1">Tabular benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Transposition instrument</th><th>Constitutional obstacle</th><th align="center">Deadline compliance (EU Directive 2019/882 — 28 Jun 2025)</th><th align="center">Digital-disability population</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 SE</strong></td><td><strong>KU32 + ordinary-law framework</strong></td><td>TF + YGL shielded media products from accessibility obligations</td><td align="center"><strong>Non-compliant until KU32 effect date 2027-01-01</strong> (9-month overrun)</td><td align="center">~1.2m Swedes with disabilities</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇪🇺 EU</strong></td><td>Directive (EU) 2019/882 (EAA)</td><td>n/a (directive sets minimum)</td><td align="center">2025-06-28 deadline</td><td align="center">~87m Europeans</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE</strong></td><td>Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz (BFSG) 2021</td><td>No constitutional obstacle; ordinary law sufficient</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~7.8m</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 FR</strong></td><td>Décret n° 2023-778 + L. 2005-102 amendments</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~12m</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇮🇪 IE</strong></td><td>European Union (Accessibility Requirements) Regs 2023</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~640 000</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 DK</strong></td><td>Tilgængelighedsloven 2025</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~700 000</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI</strong></td><td>Laki digitaalisten palvelujen tarjoamisesta (transposed)</td><td>No obstacle</td><td align="center">On-time 2025-06-28</td><td align="center">~1m</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇺🇸 US</strong></td><td>ADA Title III + Section 508</td><td>No constitutional obstacle (Title III pre-dates internet)</td><td align="center">Independent regime; precedent for 21st-century enforcement</td><td align="center">~61m</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3681,8 +3681,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-1">Where Sweden <strong>innov
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stance</th><th>Detail</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Diverges (negatively)</strong></td><td>Sweden is the <strong>only EU member state</strong> that needed a constitutional amendment to transpose EAA — a consequence of the constitutional protection of media products under TF/YGL. This is a unique civil-law artefact. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>Once KU32 takes effect in January 2027, Sweden aligns with the rest of EU-27. The 18-month compliance gap (2025-06-28 → 2027-01-01) is Commission-reportable but unlikely to trigger infringement proceedings given the good-faith constitutional-reform path. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Innovates</strong></td><td>KU32 explicitly amends both TF and YGL rather than creating an ordinary-law carve-out — giving future accessibility regulations a constitutional anchor. This is unique and potentially exported as a model for other constitutionally-protected-press jurisdictions. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package">🌐 Cluster 3 — HD03231 + HD03232: Ukraine Accountability Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231">Tabular benchmark — Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package">🌐 Cluster 3 — HD03231 + HD03232: Ukraine Accountability Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3--hd03231--hd03232-ukraine-accountability-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231">Tabular benchmark — Special Tribunal for Aggression (HD03231)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3780,7 +3780,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--special-tribunal-for-aggression-hd03231">Tabular b
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Status</th><th>Date</th><th>Contribution (if public)</th><th>Stance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 NL — Netherlands</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>Jun 2024</td><td>Tribunal seat — The Hague (likely)</td><td>Host candidate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE — Germany</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Co-leader; significant secretariat funding</td><td>Founding driver</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 FR — France</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>G7 co-signatory</td><td>Strong political support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇬🇧 UK — United Kingdom</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Core Group participant</td><td>Legal-infrastructure support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇵🇱 PL — Poland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Regional proximity</td><td>Frontline advocate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 NO — Norway</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Nordic pattern</td><td>Early supporter</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI — Finland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>NATO partner (Apr 2023)</td><td>Frontline with Russia</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇰 DK — Denmark</strong></td><td>Member</td><td>2024</td><td>Nordic pattern</td><td>Parliament ratified swiftly</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 SE — Sweden (HD03231)</strong></td><td><strong>Acceding</strong></td><td><strong>Apr 2026</strong></td><td>TBD — UU budget pending</td><td><strong>Cluster latecomer</strong> (NATO-accession sequencing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇺🇸 US — United States</strong></td><td>Observer</td><td>2024</td><td>Intelligence/legal cooperation</td><td>Ambiguous political posture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇷🇺 RU — Russia</strong></td><td>Non-member</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Tribunal target</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🌍 CoE — Council of Europe</strong></td><td>Secretariat host</td><td>2025</td><td>Legal infrastructure</td><td>Institutional anchor</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232">Tabular benchmark — International Compensation Commission (HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232">Tabular benchmark — International Compensation Commission (HD03232)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tabular-benchmark--international-compensation-commission-hd03232">Tab
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Status</th><th align="center">Ratification date</th><th>Domestic frozen-asset base</th><th align="center">Commitment to mobilise</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>🇧🇪 BE — Belgium</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td><strong>€191bn</strong> (Euroclear)</td><td align="center">Operationally coordinating</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇩🇪 DE — Germany</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>€2.5bn (est.)</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇷 FR — France</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>€12bn (est.)</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇬🇧 UK — United Kingdom</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>~£26bn frozen</td><td align="center">Mobilisation legislation being prepared</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇱 NL — Netherlands</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>~€1bn (est.)</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇳🇴 NO — Norway</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Limited</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇫🇮 FI — Finland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Limited</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 SE — Sweden (HD03232)</strong></td><td><strong>Acceding</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Apr 2026</strong></td><td>Limited (Riksbanken + commercial banks)</td><td align="center"><strong>To be determined</strong> — no domestic mobilisation bill yet tabled</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇵🇱 PL — Poland</strong></td><td>Member</td><td align="center">2024</td><td>Limited</td><td align="center">Strong political commitment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇺🇸 US — United States</strong></td><td>Non-member</td><td align="center">—</td><td>~$6bn (Treasury)</td><td align="center">REPO Act enables Treasury-side mobilisation independently</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2">Where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, <strong>diverges</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3892,7 +3892,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-where-sweden-innovates-follows-diverges-2">Where Sweden <strong>innov
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stance</th><th>Detail</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>Sweden is the ninth+ country joining the tribunal in the April 2026 cluster. Policy direction is entirely aligned with the G7 + Nordic + front-line-state consensus. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Follows</strong></td><td>Swedish contribution profile is modest (limited frozen asset base, modest GDP-proportional administrative share). Compensation Commission funding burden sits primarily with BE, UK, DE, FR. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Innovates</strong></td><td>Sweden is the <strong>only Nordic state</strong> joining tribunal and compensation commission <strong>simultaneously with a royal diplomatic visit to Kyiv</strong> — the coordination is unique. This elevates Sweden's norm-entrepreneurship signal above comparable Nordic contributions. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Diverges</strong></td><td>Sweden's accession comes <strong>~2 years after most founding members</strong> — this is a consequence of Sweden's NATO-accession sequencing (Sweden joined NATO in March 2024). Late-follower posture rather than first-mover. <code>[HIGH]</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat">📊 Macroeconomic Context (World Bank, OECD, Eurostat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat">📊 Macroeconomic Context (World Bank, OECD, Eurostat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--macroeconomic-context-world-bank-oecd-eurostat">📊 Macroeconomic C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">SE 2024</th><th align="center">SE 2023</th><th align="center">Nordic peers</th><th align="center">EU-27</th><th align="center">Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP growth (real)</td><td align="center"><strong>+0.82%</strong></td><td align="center">−0.20%</td><td align="center">NO +1.1 · DK +1.8 · FI −0.2</td><td align="center">+0.4%</td><td align="center">World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation (CPI, YoY)</td><td align="center"><strong>2.84%</strong></td><td align="center">8.55%</td><td align="center">NO 3.1 · DK 1.2 · FI 1.0</td><td align="center">2.6%</td><td align="center">World Bank</td></tr><tr><td>Public debt / GDP</td><td align="center">~31%</td><td align="center">~31%</td><td align="center">NO 44 · DK 30 · FI 76</td><td align="center">~82%</td><td align="center">Eurostat</td></tr><tr><td>Defence spending / GDP</td><td align="center">~2.2%</td><td align="center">~1.8%</td><td align="center">Rising post-NATO</td><td align="center">1.9%</td><td align="center">SIPRI</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication for HD03232 affordability</strong>: Sweden's fiscal posture (~31% debt/GDP, ~2% defence) provides <strong>room for moderate Compensation-Commission administrative contribution</strong> but <strong>limited room for open-ended reparation underwriting</strong>. SD cost-resistance is thus fiscally rational, not purely political.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict">🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrated Verdict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict">🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrated Verdict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3986,7 +3986,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-cross-cluster-integrated-verdict">🌡️ Cross-Cluster Integrate
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>SE posture 1219</th><th>Peer median</th><th align="center">Delta</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Domestic transparency (offentlighetsprincipen)</td><td>Narrowing (KU33)</td><td>Mixed</td><td align="center"><strong>↘</strong></td></tr><tr><td>EU legal-compliance posture</td><td>Catching up (KU32)</td><td>On-time 2025</td><td align="center"><strong>↘</strong></td></tr><tr><td>International accountability engagement</td><td>Advancing (HD03231/232)</td><td>Strong</td><td align="center"><strong>↗</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal commitment to Ukraine accountability</td><td>Conservative</td><td>Varied</td><td align="center"><strong>→</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Royal / head-of-state diplomatic signalling</td><td>Active (King's Kyiv visit)</td><td>Rare</td><td align="center"><strong>↑</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net</strong>: Sweden is <strong>strategically asymmetric</strong> — advancing aggressively on the international rule-of-law front while retrenching on the domestic press-freedom front. This asymmetry is the core rhetorical tension flagged in the article.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-confidence--limitations">⚠️ Confidence &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-confidence--limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--limitations">⚠️ Confidence &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>HD03232 contribution numbers</strong> are extrapolations from GDP shares; no Commission secretariat cost model has been published — estimates carry ±100% error bar.</li>
 <li><strong>RSF index 2025 values</strong> are preliminary; final release typically September; rankings may shift ±2 positions.</li>
@@ -3996,12 +3996,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-confidence--limitations">⚠️ Confidence &#x26; Limitations<a c
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-05-15 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 8 (International benchmarking — ≥ 5 jurisdictions per cluster)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CLS-ID</strong>: CLS-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-framework">Sensitivity Decision Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-framework">Sensitivity Decision Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-framework"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Document Received] --> B{Constitutional Change?}
     B -->|Yes| C[P0 - Constitutional Priority]
@@ -4020,7 +4020,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-framework">Sensitivity Decision Framework<a clas
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style G fill:#ffbb00,color:#000
     style H fill:#44aa44,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4075,7 +4075,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Priority</th><th>Classification</th><th>Retention</th><th>Offentlighetsprincipen</th><th>Reasoning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td><strong>P0 Constitutional</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>10 years</td><td>Public</td><td>Grundlag (TF) amendment; affects democratic transparency infrastructure</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td><strong>P0 Constitutional</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>10 years</td><td>Public</td><td>Grundlag (TF+YGL) amendment; EU accessibility implementation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td><strong>P1 Critical</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>7 years</td><td>Public</td><td>International treaty, Ukraine war accountability</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td><strong>P1 Critical</strong></td><td>Public — Full Analysis</td><td>7 years</td><td>Public</td><td>International treaty, international law institution</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td><strong>P2 Sector</strong></td><td>Public — Sector Summary</td><td>5 years</td><td>Public</td><td>Property rights reform; market transparency</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-political-temperature-assessment">Political Temperature Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-temperature-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-temperature-assessment">Political Temperature Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-temperature-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4118,12 +4118,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-temperature-assessment">Political Temperature Assessment<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Temperature</th><th>Trend</th><th>Parties in conflict</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33</td><td>🌡️ HIGH (7/10)</td><td>Rising</td><td>Civil liberties advocates vs. law enforcement proponents</td></tr><tr><td>KU32</td><td>🌡️ MODERATE (5/10)</td><td>Stable</td><td>Broad consensus; EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>🌡️ HIGH (8/10)</td><td>Peak</td><td>Broad cross-party support; SD cautious</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>🌡️ HIGH (7/10)</td><td>Rising</td><td>Same as HD03231</td></tr><tr><td>CU28</td><td>🌡️ LOW (3/10)</td><td>Stable</td><td>Housing industry concerns but broad agreement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU33</strong>: First-reading passage of a constitutional amendment means Sweden has made an irreversible (until next election) commitment to narrow offentlighetsprincipen for law enforcement materials. If the riksdag elected in September 2026 confirms the amendment, it takes effect January 2027 — within 9 months.</li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine Package</strong>: Simultaneous accession to both the Special Tribunal for Aggression AND the Compensation Commission represents a comprehensive legal-accountability commitment to Ukraine, coinciding with the King's visit to Kyiv (2026-04-17). Globally only ≈40 states have joined the tribunal; Sweden's accession is norm-entrepreneurship with historical significance.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis">Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis">Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4160,13 +4160,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention-schedule-legal-basis">Retention Schedule (Legal Basis)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Priority</th><th align="center">Retention period</th><th>Legal basis</th><th>Access rule</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">P0 Constitutional</td><td align="center">10 years</td><td>Arkivlagen 1990:782 §3 + Riksdag ordning 1991:877 — grundlag-related material treated as permanent evidentiary record</td><td>Public — full analysis published</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P1 Critical (treaty)</td><td align="center">7 years</td><td>SOU-series standard; international-treaty material at UD retention schedule</td><td>Public — full analysis published</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P2 Sector</td><td align="center">5 years</td><td>OSL 2009:400 chap 39 — normal sector-policy retention</td><td>Public — sector summary published</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P3 Routine</td><td align="center">2 years</td><td>Allmän retention</td><td>Internal only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-access-rules">Access Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-access-rules">Access Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-access-rules"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>All P0/P1 analysis files</strong> are published under the Riksdagsmonitor public-transparency commitment — no redactions.</li>
 <li><strong>Per-document files in <code>documents/</code></strong> are considered reference-grade intelligence artefacts; they should be preserved for minimum 10 years (P0) or 7 years (P1).</li>
 <li><strong>Upstream data dependencies</strong> (riksdagen.se + regeringen.se + World Bank + SCB) are referenced via permanent dok_id URLs — no data copied into the repository beyond what appears in analysis text.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine">Cross-Reference to Classification Doctrine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine">Cross-Reference to Classification Doctrine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine"></a></h3>
 <p>This run's classification decisions align with Hack23 ISMS <code>CLASSIFICATION.md</code> for CIA triad impact:</p>
 
 
@@ -4212,12 +4212,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-classification-doctrine">Cross-Reference to Classi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th align="center">Confidentiality</th><th align="center">Integrity</th><th align="center">Availability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH (constitutional record)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH (international treaty)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td align="center">Public</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>No CIA-triad rating change is proposed by this run; existing <code>CLASSIFICATION.md</code> baseline holds.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>XRF-ID</strong>: XRF-20260419-1219<br>
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling<br>
 <strong>Version</strong>: 2.0 (Pass 2 enriched)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationships">Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationships"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationships">Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationships"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[HD01KU33&#x3C;br/>Beslag/offentlighetsprincip&#x3C;br/>P0 Constitutional] --> B[HD01KU32&#x3C;br/>Media Accessibility&#x3C;br/>P0 Constitutional]
     B --> C[KU Committee Pattern:&#x3C;br/>Two grundlag amendments&#x3C;br/>same riksmöte]
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationships">Document Relationships<a class="" aria-hidden
     style B fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style D fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs">Forward Chain — Links to Prior Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs">Forward Chain — Links to Prior Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4280,17 +4280,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-chain--links-to-prior-runs">Forward Chain — Links to Prior
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior dok_id</th><th>Prior Run</th><th>Link to This Run</th><th>Type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD0399 (Vårändringsbudget)</td><td>2026-04-18 1705</td><td>Fiscal envelope for Ukraine costs</td><td>Background</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 (Vårproposition)</td><td>2026-04-18 1705</td><td>Economic framework</td><td>Background</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 (Juvenile justice)</td><td>2026-04-18 1705</td><td>Part of Strömmer reform agenda (alongside KU33 law enforcement)</td><td>Thematic</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220 (NATO Finland)</td><td>Earlier run</td><td>Ukraine security architecture; HD03231 completes legal layer</td><td>Direct link</td></tr><tr><td>HD01UFöU3 (NATO Finland bet)</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>Committee approval of NATO contribution; context for Ukraine propositions</td><td>Context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-continuity-contracts">Continuity Contracts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-continuity-contracts">Continuity Contracts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contracts"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU33 monitoring contract</strong>: This run creates monitoring obligation to track: (a) chamber vote 2026-04-22, (b) any opposition amendments, (c) Lagrådet opinion if published, (d) second reading timeline post-September 2026 election.</li>
 <li><strong>Ukraine package monitoring contract</strong>: Track UU committee referral of HD03231/232; expected UU betänkande within 8-10 weeks; vote likely before summer recess.</li>
 <li><strong>Housing registry tracking</strong>: CU28 implementation — Lantmäteriet capacity assessment Q3 2026.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis">Inter-Document Pattern Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis">Inter-Document Pattern Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-inter-document-pattern-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Pattern 1 — Constitutional Double-Move</strong>: KU32 (media accessibility, EU compliance) and KU33 (seizure secrecy, law enforcement) are both grundlag amendments in the same riksmöte. While superficially different in purpose, their simultaneous passage establishes a precedent that grundlag modification is a normal legislative tool. This is historically unusual — Sweden has traditionally treated grundlag amendments with extreme caution.</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern 2 — Ukraine Norm Entrepreneurship</strong>: The combination of HD03231 (Special Tribunal) + HD03232 (Compensation Commission) + HD03220 (NATO Finland contribution) + the King's Kyiv visit forms a coherent pattern: Sweden is actively positioning itself as a Ukraine accountability leader in the post-NATO-accession period. This represents a strategic foreign policy repositioning.</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern 3 — Property Market Anti-Crime Reform</strong>: CU28 (national housing register) + HD01CU27 (lagfart identity) + HD03233 (telecoms fraud, from April 14) form a coordinated anti-financial-crime package, consistent with the Kristersson government's emphasis on law and order across multiple domains.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters">Timeline Spine — Parliamentary Journey of Lead Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters">Timeline Spine — Parliamentary Journey of Lead Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title KU33 + Ukraine Package Parliamentary Journey
     2026-04-16 : HD03231 tabled (UD)
@@ -4307,7 +4307,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-timeline-spine--parliamentary-journey-of-lead-clusters">Timeline Spin
     2027-01 : Post-election riksdag
               : Second reading KU33 + KU32
     2027-01-01 : KU33 + KU32 effect date (if confirmed)</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-continuity-contract-register">Continuity Contract Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contract-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-continuity-contract-register">Continuity Contract Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-contract-register"></a></h3>
 <p>Every open forward watchpoint created by this run is tracked in the central continuity register:</p>
 
 
@@ -4371,7 +4371,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-continuity-contract-register">Continuity Contract Register<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Contract ID</th><th>Subject</th><th>Owner</th><th>Closure trigger</th><th>Owner of next check</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CC-KU33-2026-04</td><td>KU33 chamber vote</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>Chamber protokoll 2026-04-22</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-LAGR-KU33</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>Yttrande publication</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-UU-HD03231</td><td>UU referral of HD03231</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>UU committee chair announcement</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-UU-HD03232</td><td>UU referral of HD03232</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>UU committee chair announcement + SD position</td><td>Next realtime run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-SAPO-2026</td><td>SÄPO posture post-HD03231</td><td>realtime-monitor + evening-analysis</td><td>Any public SÄPO threat-level update</td><td>Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>CC-ELECTION-2026</td><td>Swedish general election impact on KU33</td><td>weekly-review + month-ahead</td><td>2026-09-13 result</td><td>Post-election run</td></tr><tr><td>CC-CU28-IMPL</td><td>CU28 implementation capacity</td><td>realtime-monitor</td><td>Lantmäteriet Q3 2026 capacity assessment</td><td>Weekly-review</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar">Cross-Reference to Upstream Exemplar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar">Cross-Reference to Upstream Exemplar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar"></a></h3>
 <p>This run extends the <strong>reference-grade exemplar structure</strong> introduced by <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></a>. Pattern reuse:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Same 14-artifact registry</li>
@@ -4388,14 +4388,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-upstream-exemplar">Cross-Reference to Upstream Exe
 <li>1219 scenario-analysis shifts probability slightly toward Scenario C because of emergent HD03232 cost uncertainty</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>MTH-ID</strong>: MTH-20260419-1219
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-19
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Version</strong>: 1.0 (Tier-C reference-grade extension)
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Self-audit of the analytic tradecraft applied in realtime-1219, upstream watchpoint reconciliation across 5 sibling runs, and doctrine-level recommendations for codification into <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and <code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>The guide <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 specifies eight rules. This run's application of each:</p>
 
 
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-methodology-application-matrix">1. Methodology Application Matrix<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rule</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence / Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">R1</td><td>Pre-article universal gate (read all analysis before writing article)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §Pre-Article Gate — all 9 core files read before article emitted</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R2</td><td>Article-type isolation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>All analysis written to <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/</code> — no cross-write</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R3</td><td>Coverage-completeness rule (all DIW ≥ 5 documents appear in article)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>KU33, KU32, HD03231, HD03232, CU28 all covered</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R4</td><td>DIW-weighted lead-story selection</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code> §Sensitivity confirms KU33 lead robust</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R5</td><td>Rhetorical-tension gate</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Domestic-transparency-vs-international-accountability tension surfaced in article lede and every analysis file</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R6</td><td>Depth tiers (L1/L2/L2+/L3)</td><td align="center">⚠️ Partial → ✅</td><td>Pass-1: per-document files @ L2 tier (62-114 lines). Pass-2: expanded per plans; registry now at 14 files</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R7</td><td>Self-audit matrix (this file)</td><td align="center">❌ → ✅</td><td>Pass-1: missing entirely. Pass-2: file created with upstream reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R8</td><td>International benchmarking (≥ 5 jurisdictions per cluster)</td><td align="center">⚠️ Partial → ✅</td><td>Pass-1: 6 jurisdictions inside <code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code> only. Pass-2: full <code>comparative-international.md</code> with ≥ 8 jurisdictions for all three clusters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: the initial 1219 draft was L2 / 9-artifact — the new Tier-C extension (README + executive-brief + scenario-analysis + comparative-international + methodology-reflection) brings the run to L3 / 14-artifact reference-grade parity with <code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4595,9 +4595,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">2. Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improveme
 <p><strong>Pass-1 baseline</strong>: 9 registry files totalling ~40 KB, 3 per-document files totalling ~20 KB → 60 KB dossier.
 <strong>Pass-2 target</strong>: 14 registry files totalling ~120 KB + 3 per-document files → ~140 KB dossier — <strong>matches the <code>2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code> reference exemplar</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">3. Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">3. Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h3>
 <p>This section reconciles <strong>every forward indicator</strong> issued in sibling runs over the last 5 days (2026-04-14 → 2026-04-19) and states its disposition in 1219. Dispositions: <strong>Carried forward</strong> · <strong>Retired</strong> · <strong>Carried with reduced priority</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sibling-runs-reviewed">Sibling runs reviewed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-runs-reviewed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sibling-runs-reviewed">Sibling runs reviewed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-runs-reviewed"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4634,7 +4634,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sibling-runs-reviewed">Sibling runs reviewed<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Run</th><th>Path</th><th>Key watchpoints sampled</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/*</code></td><td>Spring budget signals; NATO-Finland betänkande</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-15</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-15/*</code></td><td>Government fortnight calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-16</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-16/*</code></td><td>HD03231/232 tabling indicator</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-17</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-17/realtime-1434/</code></td><td>KU32/KU33 first-reading prep; Ukraine royal-visit signal</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-18</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-18/realtime-1705/</code>, <code>weekly-review/</code></td><td>Vårproposition; HD03246; September election scenario priors</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-reconciliation-table">Reconciliation table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconciliation-table"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reconciliation-table">Reconciliation table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reconciliation-table"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4762,7 +4762,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reconciliation-table">Reconciliation table<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Upstream Source</th><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Disposition in 1219</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>KU33 chamber-vote scheduling</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Chamber vote now scheduled 2026-04-22 — tracked in <code>executive-brief.md</code> calendar</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>KU32 chamber-vote scheduling</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Same 2026-04-22 window — tracked</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>HD03231 tabling</td><td><strong>Closed</strong></td><td>Tabled 2026-04-16; now per-document analysis in 1219</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>HD03232 tabling</td><td><strong>Closed</strong></td><td>Tabled 2026-04-16; now per-document analysis in 1219</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Not yet published; retained in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> trigger calendar</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>Russian hybrid-response leading indicators post-tribunal vote</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Retained as wildcard W1 in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>; MITRE-TTP in <code>threat-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>2026-04-17 realtime-1434</td><td>US tribunal posture</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Retained as wildcard W2; LOW confidence label</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>Vårproposition fiscal envelope</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Used as fiscal context for HD03232 affordability in <code>comparative-international.md</code> §Macro</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>Vårändringsbudget (HD0399)</td><td><strong>Carried forward</strong></td><td>Same use</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>HD03246 juvenile-justice Strömmer agenda</td><td><strong>Carried forward (thematic)</strong></td><td>KU33 is continuation of same crime-enforcement posture</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>HD03236 (not in 1219 cluster)</td><td><strong>Retired</strong></td><td>Outside 1219 document window; handled by date-specific coverage</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td>2026-04-18 realtime-1705</td><td>HD01SfU22 (immigration)</td><td><strong>Retired</strong></td><td>Outside cluster; handled elsewhere</td></tr><tr><td align="center">13</td><td>2026-04-18 weekly-review</td><td>September 2026 election scenario priors</td><td><strong>Carried forward — aligned</strong></td><td>Post-election probability priors in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> aligned to weekly-review values</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td>2026-04-16 (if present)</td><td>HD03244 public-sector interoperability</td><td><strong>Retired</strong></td><td>Outside current cluster; referenced only as policy-trend context in stakeholder perspectives §4</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>HD01UFöU3 NATO-Finland</td><td><strong>Carried forward (background)</strong></td><td>Context for Ukraine-package credibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>HD03233 telecoms fraud</td><td><strong>Carried forward (thematic)</strong></td><td>Context for law-and-order policy pattern in <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> §Pattern 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Hard rule compliance</strong>: every watchpoint is either carried forward with a named continuation or retired with an explicit reason. No silent drops. ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots">4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots">4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4806,7 +4806,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-uncertainty-hot-spots">4. Uncertainty Hot-Spots<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Uncertainty source</th><th>Effect on conclusions</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Formellt tillförd bevisning" judicial interpretation</td><td>Novel phrase, no direct comparator jurisprudence</td><td>Scenario A/C probabilities swing ±0.10</td><td>Track Lagrådet yttrande; update on publication</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish contribution to HD03232 administrative budget</td><td>Commission secretariat cost model not published</td><td>±100% error bar on SEK 50-200m/yr estimate</td><td>Track UU committee budget demand on HD03232</td></tr><tr><td>September 2026 election outcome</td><td>5 months to election; inherent volatility</td><td>Post-election confirmation P(KU33) swings 0.25-0.75</td><td>Monthly SOM-poll Bayesian updates</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid-response magnitude</td><td>Baseline rising post-NATO accession (2024)</td><td>W1 probability 0.04 (with ±0.05 band)</td><td>SÄPO bulletins; coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour detection</td></tr><tr><td>US tribunal posture</td><td>Administration-transition volatility</td><td>W2 probability 0.06 (with ±0.10 band)</td><td>White House + Treasury public statements</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run">5. Known Limitations of This Run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run">5. Known Limitations of This Run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>No primary Swedish-language interview sourcing</strong> — all claims rely on published Riksdag documents, regeringen.se press releases, and secondary academic/NGO material. This is a structural limit of agentic workflow operation.</li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet yttrande had not been published</strong> at run time (2026-04-19 12:19 UTC) — scenario probabilities must be updated when it is.</li>
@@ -4815,7 +4815,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-known-limitations-of-this-run">5. Known Limitations of This Run<a c
 <li><strong>Red-team / steelman coverage</strong> on KU32 is lighter than on KU33 because KU32 is the secondary cluster — acceptable per R6 depth-tier doctrine.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-probability-alignment-audit">6. Probability-Alignment Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-probability-alignment-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-probability-alignment-audit">6. Probability-Alignment Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-probability-alignment-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4873,7 +4873,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-probability-alignment-audit">6. Probability-Alignment Audit<a class
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th align="center">1219 value</th><th align="center">Upstream anchor</th><th align="center">Delta</th><th>Justified by</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Base scenario A probability</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">1434 base = 0.60</td><td align="center">−0.05</td><td>HD03232 cost uncertainty emerged 1219</td></tr><tr><td>Bull scenario B probability</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">1434 bull = 0.20</td><td align="center">0</td><td>No new evidence for strengthening</td></tr><tr><td>Bear scenario C probability</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">1434 bear = 0.15</td><td align="center">+0.05</td><td>Added SD cost-resistance channel</td></tr><tr><td>Wildcard combined</td><td align="center">0.05</td><td align="center">1434 wildcards = 0.05</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Same</td></tr><tr><td>P(KU33 second reading confirmed)</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">weekly-review = 0.60</td><td align="center">−0.05</td><td>Same HD03232 cost-uncertainty drag</td></tr><tr><td>P(Tidö retains majority Sep 2026)</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">weekly-review = 0.38</td><td align="center">−0.03</td><td>Minor poll drift</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Audit finding</strong>: all divergences are within epistemic-band tolerance (±0.10) and have an explicit evidentiary reason. ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">7. Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">7. Recommendations for Doctrine Codification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification"></a></h3>
 <p>These recommendations are proposed for merge into <code>.github/aw/SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md</code> and <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>:</p>
 
 
@@ -4936,7 +4936,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-recommendations-for-doctrine-codification">7. Recommendations for D
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Recommendation</th><th>Rationale</th><th>Proposed destination</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">D1</td><td><strong>Promote <code>news-realtime-monitor</code> to the 14-artifact Tier-C reference-grade tier</strong></td><td>Realtime-monitor is the flagship editorial surface; every breaking run is consumed externally and must carry the same decision-maker entry points as a weekly review.</td><td>SHARED_PROMPT_PATTERNS.md §14 REQUIRED Artifacts — add <code>news-realtime-monitor</code> to AGGREGATION_TYPES</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D2</td><td><strong>Extend the 14-artifact gate to breaking-news runs</strong> with a <code>breaking_override</code> flag so routine daily runs remain at 9-artifact</td><td>Avoid overwhelming daily runs with Tier-C burden when no lead-story DIW ≥ 7.0 exists</td><td>Workflow-level pre-check gate</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D3</td><td><strong>Make <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> upstream-reconciliation table mandatory</strong> for realtime-monitor runs that carry forward indicators from ≥ 3 sibling runs</td><td>Prevents silent-drop of forward indicators</td><td>Guide §Rule 7 + R7 self-audit doctrine</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D4</td><td><strong>Codify "formellt tillförd bevisning" interpretive tracking</strong> as a long-lived watchpoint</td><td>The phrase is the strategic centre of gravity for KU33; needs multi-month tracking</td><td>Continuity-contract template in cross-reference-map.md</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D5</td><td><strong>Require ≥ 5-jurisdiction <code>comparative-international.md</code> for every cluster with DIW ≥ 7.0</strong> regardless of workflow type</td><td>Currently only required for aggregation workflows; KU33 demonstrates the need in realtime-monitor</td><td>Guide §Rule 8 threshold rewrite</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D6</td><td><strong>Require per-document depth-tier declaration in run header</strong> (L1/L2/L2+/L3) with evidence trigger</td><td>The current 1219 per-document files did not declare tier-trigger reasons explicitly</td><td>Per-file template header</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D7</td><td><strong>Add 14-artifact gate test to <code>scripts/analysis-references.ts</code></strong> so the scanner recognises realtime-monitor 14-artifact runs as reference-grade</td><td>Build-time enforcement complements runtime gate</td><td>scripts/analysis-references.ts KNOWN_ANALYSIS_FILES</td></tr><tr><td align="center">D8</td><td><strong>Standardise "Pass-1 → Pass-2 improvement evidence" table</strong> as required section in every methodology-reflection.md</td><td>Provides reproducible quality metric for AI-FIRST iteration principle</td><td>Template in analysis/templates/methodology-reflection.md (new template)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-confidence-self-assessment">8. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-confidence-self-assessment">8. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4989,7 +4989,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-confidence-self-assessment">8. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU33 lead-story correct per DIW</td><td>Sensitivity analysis robust across 3 weight perturbations</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Rhetorical tension is the analytical heart of the run</td><td>Surfaced in every analysis file and article</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario base-case P = 0.55</td><td>Upstream alignment + independent Bayesian update</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 Swedish contribution SEK 50-200m/yr</td><td>GDP-proportional extrapolation</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Second-reading confirmation forecast 0.55</td><td>Heavy dependency on 2026 election outcome</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Russian hybrid W1 P = 0.04</td><td>Order-of-magnitude from post-NATO-accession base rate</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (direction) / LOW (magnitude)</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative panel ≥ 5 jurisdictions per cluster</td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code> tabular benchmark</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Upstream watchpoint reconciliation (16 items, 5 runs)</td><td>Reconciliation table above</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers">9. Recommended Next-Review Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers">9. Recommended Next-Review Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers"></a></h3>
 <p>Trigger a new synthesis for this cluster if any of the following occur within 14 days:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33/KU32 published (any content)</li>
@@ -5002,8 +5002,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-recommended-next-review-triggers">9. Recommended Next-Review Trigge
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 §Rule 7 (self-audit) + §Rule 8 (international benchmarking) · <strong>Next review</strong>: 2026-05-01</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Total</strong>: 5 primary documents + 3 supporting government sources</p>
 
 
@@ -5059,7 +5059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Title</th><th>Date</th><th>Priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>betänkande</td><td>KU</td><td>Insyn i handlingar från beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>P0 (Constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>betänkande</td><td>KU</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>P1 (Constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>proposition</td><td>UD</td><td>Sveriges anslutning till tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>P1 (Critical)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>proposition</td><td>UD</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till konventionen om internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>P1 (Critical)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>betänkande</td><td>CU</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>P2 (Sector)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-supporting-sources">Supporting Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-supporting-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-supporting-sources">Supporting Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-supporting-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5091,18 +5091,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-supporting-sources">Supporting Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Type</th><th>Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Regeringen press release 2026-04-17</td><td>Pressmeddelande</td><td>H.M. Konungen + FM Malmer Stenergard besöker Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen press release 2026-04-18</td><td>Pressmeddelande</td><td>Stöd till kulturarvsbevarande i Ukraina</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank SWE GDP Growth 2024</td><td>Economic data</td><td>GDP growth 0.82% (2024), down from 5.2% in 2021</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank SWE Inflation 2024</td><td>Economic data</td><td>Inflation 2.836% (2024), down from 8.5% in 2023</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-freshness">Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-freshness">Data Freshness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-freshness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Riksdag data</strong>: Live as of 2026-04-19T12:19:53Z (status: "live")</li>
 <li><strong>Government data</strong>: g0v.se last synced within 24h</li>
 <li><strong>World Bank</strong>: Most recent available (2024 values)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-previous-run-coverage">Previous Run Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-coverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-run-coverage">Previous Run Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-coverage"></a></h3>
 <p>The previous realtime run (2026-04-18 1705) covered: HD03100, HD03236, HD03246, HD01SfU22, HD0399. All 5 documents in this run are NEW (not previously covered).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>AI-driven analysis following <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1.
 Per-document depth tiers: KU33 (L3), KU32 (L2+), HD03231+HD03232 (L2+), CU28 (L2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-chain-of-custody-manifest">Chain-of-Custody Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-custody-manifest"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-chain-of-custody-manifest">Chain-of-Custody Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-custody-manifest"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5190,14 +5190,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-chain-of-custody-manifest">Chain-of-Custody Manifest<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Source</th><th>URL / Reference</th><th>Accessed</th><th>Fetched via</th><th>Caching</th><th>Integrity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD01KU33</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache (run-scoped)</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD01KU32</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD03231</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD03232</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Riksdagen.se — HD01CU28</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:19Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Regeringen.se — 2026-04-17 presser</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/">https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:20Z</td><td>riksdag-regering-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>HTTP 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>World Bank — Sweden GDP growth 2024</td><td><a href="https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG">https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:21Z</td><td>world-bank-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>JSON valid</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>World Bank — Sweden CPI 2024</td><td><a href="https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG">https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/SWE/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG</a></td><td>2026-04-19T12:21Z</td><td>world-bank-mcp</td><td>Session cache</td><td>JSON valid</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-integrity-rules">Provenance Integrity Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-integrity-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-integrity-rules">Provenance Integrity Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-integrity-rules"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All riksdag-regering-mcp calls use HTTPS transport to <a href="https://riksdag-regering-ai.onrender.com/mcp">https://riksdag-regering-ai.onrender.com/mcp</a> with proxy allowlist enforcement.</li>
 <li>World Bank data retrieved via worldbank-mcp (container <code>node:25-alpine</code> per <code>.github/workflows/news-realtime-monitor.lock.yml</code> mcp-servers block).</li>
 <li>No personal data (PII) is cached; all fetched content is official public record.</li>
 <li>Cache retention: session-scoped only (per agent run); no persistent storage of external data in the repository.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-quality-rating">Document-Quality Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-quality-rating"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-quality-rating">Document-Quality Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-quality-rating"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5252,7 +5252,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-quality-rating">Document-Quality Rating<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th align="center">Quality rating</th><th align="center">Completeness</th><th align="center">Primary-source confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33 betänkande</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 betänkande</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 proposition</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232 proposition</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28 betänkande</td><td align="center">Official</td><td align="center">Full text available</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen.se presser (King Kyiv)</td><td align="center">Government press release</td><td align="center">Full</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank GDP / CPI</td><td align="center">Public API</td><td align="center">Full</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage-completeness-attestation">Coverage-Completeness Attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-completeness-attestation">Coverage-Completeness Attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-completeness-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>All 4 documents with weighted DIW ≥ 5.0 appear in the published article with dedicated H2/H3 sections:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ HD01KU33 (8.48) — H2 lead-story section</li>
@@ -5261,6 +5261,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-coverage-completeness-attestation">Coverage-Completeness Attestation<
 <li>✅ HD01CU28 (5.93) — H3 under "Sector updates"</li>
 </ul>
 <p>All per-document files exist at the declared depth tier. See <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> §Pass-1 → Pass-2 improvement evidence for the reference-grade-extension audit.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-HD03232-ukraine-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-19/realtime-1219/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -5300,7 +5320,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:04.832Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:26.222Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html b/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html
index 244c823d13..4ee037bc67 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden&#039;s">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.097Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.485Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.097Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.485Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-20T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's","description":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's pre-election parliamentary accountability campaign. The Riksdag's Environment and Agriculture Committee (MJU) published a committee report…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:05.097Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's","description":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's pre-election parliamentary accountability campaign. The Riksdag's Environment and Agriculture Committee (MJU) published a committee report…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:26.485Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,16 +196,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Produced by</strong>: news-evening-analysis</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h3>
 <p>Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's pre-election parliamentary accountability campaign. The Riksdag's Environment and Agriculture Committee (MJU) published a committee report (HD01MJU21) on the National Audit Office's finding that <strong>Sweden's state efforts for agricultural climate transition are insufficient</strong> — a legally binding finding from an independent constitutional body that joins the government's controversial fuel tax cut (HD03236) to create a two-source, independently verified climate credibility challenge going into the September 13, 2026 election.</p>
 <p>The Social Democrats continued their coordinated accountability saturation tactic with <strong>8 written questions in a single day</strong>, targeting infrastructure (Minister Andreas Carlson, KD, for the 6th+ time), justice (Minister Gunnar Strömmer, M), energy (alum shale), and constitutional education. Additionally, S's Mattias Vepsä filed an interpellation (HD10439) challenging Strömmer on the Stockholm police shortage — attacking the government's proudest achievement (BRÅ confirmed the 10,000-officer target) by questioning its geographic and qualitative distribution.</p>
 <p>The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation structure (KU42) and a new Riksdag medal law (KU43), while S's Eva Lindh asked what the Education Ministry is doing to improve constitutional knowledge among citizens — a strategically timed question following last week's passage of two vilande constitutional amendments.</p>
 <p><strong>Three ministers face concentrated pressure</strong>: Strömmer (police), Carlson (infrastructure × 2 new questions), and newly Education Minister Mohammso (constitutional knowledge). The government has a defensible position on police numbers but is exposed on quality/distribution. It has no immediate answer to the Riksrevisionen's agricultural climate finding.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🌾 <strong>Riksrevisionen finds Sweden's agricultural climate transition insufficient</strong> (HD01MJU21) — independent finding joins fuel tax cut as two-front climate challenge</li>
 <li>👮 <strong>S targets Stockholm police shortage</strong> (HD10439: Vepsä → Strömmer) — BRÅ confirmed numbers but distribution gaps remain in capital</li>
@@ -217,14 +217,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-
 <li>🗳️ <strong>146 days to election</strong> — S's filing pace 50%+ above session average; coordinated campaign crystallising</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-supported">3 Decisions Supported<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-supported"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-supported">3 Decisions Supported<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-supported"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Government response strategy</strong>: Justice Minister Strömmer should proactively link HD03237 (paid police training) to HD10439's Stockholm concerns in his response — turning S's question into a government implementation story</li>
 <li><strong>Agricultural climate action</strong>: Climate/Agriculture Ministry should announce an agricultural SOU or consultation process within 30 days to transform MJU21 from a liability into a demonstrated response</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional communication</strong>: Education Ministry HD11726 answer should be substantive — reference vilande amendment education campaign, Riksdag public outreach programme, and school civics curriculum update</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus">Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus">Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus">Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Stockholm media picks up police gap story before Strömmer responds</td><td align="center">1.8</td><td align="center">April 21–22</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Riksrevisionen MJU21 triggers Klimatpolitiska rådet comment</td><td align="center">2.2</td><td align="center">May–June</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>S week-3 interpellation surge (late April) — 3–5 new IPs</td><td align="center">1.86</td><td align="center">April 28–May 5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Constitutional knowledge answer (HD11726) amplified by media post-vilande</td><td align="center">1.2</td><td align="center">April 28–May 7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Coalition climate fracture on alum shale (HD11725)</td><td align="center">0.9</td><td align="center">May–July</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-today">Named Actors Today<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-today"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-today">Named Actors Today<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-today"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors-today">Named Actors Today<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Party/Role</th><th>Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong></td><td>Justice Minister (M)</td><td>Target of HD10439 Stockholm police interpellation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mattias Vepsä</strong></td><td>S MP</td><td>Filed HD10439 interpellation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Eva Lindh</strong></td><td>S MP</td><td>Filed HD11726 constitutional knowledge question</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson</strong></td><td>Infrastructure Minister (KD)</td><td>Target of HD11722 + HD11724 (6th+ accountability filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carina Ödebrink</strong></td><td>S MP</td><td>Filed HD11722 + HD11724 (double infrastructure question)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Britz</strong></td><td>Climate Minister (L)</td><td>Target of HD11720 cable recycling question</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Simona Mohammso</strong></td><td>Education Minister (M)</td><td>Target of HD11726 constitutional knowledge</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Peter Kullgren</strong></td><td>Rural Minister (KD)</td><td>Target of HD11721 Leader rural development</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21">Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21">Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU deliberations</strong>: KU42 and KU43 move toward plenary scheduling</li>
 <li><strong>MJU21 media response</strong>: Watch DN/SvD morning editions for Riksrevisionen agricultural climate coverage</li>
@@ -330,17 +330,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21">Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)<a cl
 <li><strong>EU Summit context</strong>: EU-SUMMIT-20260422 (from realtime memory) — Swedish government positioning on climate/security</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <img src="https://hack23.com/icon-192.png" alt="Hack23 Logo" width="96" height="96">
 </p>
-<h2 align="center" id="rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h2 align="center" id="rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
 <p align="center">
   <strong>Constitutional Budget Scrutiny · Agricultural Climate Failure · Opposition Accountability Offensive</strong><br>
   <em>Monday 2026-04-20 | Riksmöte 2025/26 | Deep Analysis</em>
 </p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--synthesis-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-metadata"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Synthesis ID</strong></td><td><code>SYN-2026-04-20-EVE001</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 17:31 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>14 (3 committee reports + 1 interpellation + 8 written questions + 2 cross-refs)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 (plus integrated sibling analysis: CR, PROP, MOT, IP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-evening-analysis agentic workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH 🟩</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Days to Election</strong></td><td>~146 days (September 13, 2026)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph "📊 Evening Analysis Intelligence Dashboard — 2026-04-20"
         direction TB
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-
     style POL fill:#C62828,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#E65100,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Electoral Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>Budget structure under constitutional scrutiny</strong> — KU42 debates the appropriation-area framework; constitutional committee's scrutiny role underscores the pre-election accountability atmosphere</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">🟠HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">Fiscal credibility narrative</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>Agricultural climate transition failures</strong> — Riksrevisionen MJU21 finds state efforts insufficient; Sweden risks missing 2030 agricultural emissions targets despite government rhetoric on "green transition"</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td align="center">🟠HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">Opposition climate narrative</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>Stockholm police shortage framing</strong> — Vepsä (S) interpellation challenges Strömmer on whether BRÅ-documented police goal masks quality/distribution problems; Stockholm specifically underpoliced</td><td>HD10439</td><td align="center">🟠HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">S security credibility challenge</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>4</strong></td><td><strong>S accountability saturation tactic</strong> — 8 written questions in single day targeting infrastructure, energy, education, justice; pattern across full legislative week shows S filing at 60%+ above session average</td><td>HD11722–HD11727</td><td align="center">🟡MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">Parliamentary record pre-election</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td><strong>Riksdag medal law modernisation</strong> — KU43 creates modern framework for the Riksdag's ceremonial medal; non-controversial; scheduled for debate</td><td>HD01KU43</td><td align="center">🟢LOW</td><td align="center">🟦VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">Symbolic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-significance-ranking">📈 Document Significance Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-significance-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-significance-ranking">📈 Document Significance Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-significance-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -542,44 +542,44 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-significance-ranking">📈 Document Significance Ranking<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Committee</th><th>Title</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Key Driver</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td align="center">MJU</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td align="center"><strong>18/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 TIER-2</td><td>Riksrevisionen finding; climate election battleground</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10439</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm (IP)</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 TIER-2</td><td>Links to HD03237; S-M security debate</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">KU</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td align="center"><strong>15/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 TIER-2</td><td>Budget framework; constitutional scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD11725</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Kommunalt veto mot alunskifferbrytning</td><td align="center"><strong>10/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 TIER-3</td><td>Energy/environment tension; C+S alignment</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD11726</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Kunskap om grundlagarna</td><td align="center"><strong>9/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 TIER-3</td><td>Constitutional week; election-year civics framing</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>HD11722</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Trafikverkets anslag till ideella org</td><td align="center"><strong>8/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 TIER-3</td><td>Carlson infrastructure accountability</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7–14</td><td>HD11720–27</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Written questions (8 items)</td><td align="center">5–8/25</td><td align="center">🟢 TIER-3</td><td>Routine but collectively significant</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-document-patterns">🔍 Cross-Document Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-document-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week">Theme 1: S Accountability Offensive — Constitutional Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-document-patterns">🔍 Cross-Document Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-document-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week">Theme 1: S Accountability Offensive — Constitutional Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: 🟩HIGH</strong> — Reading the day's document flow alongside the week's earlier motions and interpellations, a unified picture emerges: the Social Democrats are running a disciplined, coordinated parliamentary accountability campaign. The August calendar shows S's full-session filing rate has accelerated by ~50% since April 14 (interpellation analysis). Monday April 20's 8 written questions span: infrastructure (Minister Carlson, who faces 6th+ interpellation), energy (alum shale, Minister Busch/Britz), justice (Minister Strömmer, also facing new interpellation HD10439), and constitutional education (Minister Mohammso). No portfolio is left unchallenged.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral logic</strong>: S is exploiting a "records matter" strategy — each written question creates a timestamped parliamentary exchange before the summer recess. Any non-committal or weak ministerial response becomes usable September-campaign material. The constitutional knowledge question (HD11726) is especially strategically timed: one week after two constitutional amendments (KU33/KU32) passed "vilande", demanding constitutional competence answers from the Education Minister while the government champions constitutional reform is a neat rhetorical trap.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens">Theme 2: Climate Credibility Gap Widens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens">Theme 2: Climate Credibility Gap Widens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: 🟩HIGH</strong> — MJU21 (Riksrevisionen on agricultural climate) and HD11725 (alum shale municipal veto) together reinforce the opposition's central Spring 2026 climate narrative established in the motions analysis: the government is simultaneously cutting fuel taxes (HD03236, adding +0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e) and now found to have insufficient agricultural climate transition plans. Agriculture represents ~14% of Sweden's domestic GHG emissions; the Riksrevisionen finding adds a third front of climate accountability to fuel taxes and energy policy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension">Theme 3: Police Quality vs. Quantity Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension">Theme 3: Police Quality vs. Quantity Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: 🟧MEDIUM</strong> — HD10439 targets Justice Minister Strömmer on the BRÅ evaluation of the 10,000 police officer goal. The BRÅ evaluation confirms the numerical target was reached — but S's framing targets Stockholm-specific distribution failures and quality/deployment issues. This is a sophisticated challenge: the government can defend the headline number while S attacks its operational implementation. The argument is rendered more complex because HD03237 (paid police training) — part of today's sibling proposition package — is precisely the government's answer to recruitment constraints. S is attacking a problem the government claims to have already solved.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--aggregated-swot">📊 Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--aggregated-swot"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment">Strengths (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregated-swot">📊 Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregated-swot"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment">Strengths (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Police 10,000 target met (BRÅ confirmed) — defensible headline number</li>
 <li>KU42 debate shows constitutional transparency commitment</li>
 <li>KU43 modernisation demonstrates legislative housekeeping competence</li>
 <li>Energy reform pipeline (HD03240/39/38) provides forward counter-narrative to climate attacks</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment">Weaknesses (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment">Weaknesses (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>MJU21/Riksrevisionen finding on agricultural climate is legally on the record — difficult to dismiss</li>
 <li>Stockholm police distribution gap (HD10439) cannot be erased by numerical targets</li>
 <li>Minister Carlson (infrastructure) remains most-targeted minister — KD portfolio vulnerability</li>
 <li>8 ministerial portfolios challenged in a single day; bandwidth pressure on government responses</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment">Opportunities (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment">Opportunities (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>KU42 budget structure debate allows government to showcase fiscal responsibility narrative</li>
 <li>Linking HD03237 (paid police training) proactively to HD10439 concerns would turn S's question into a government success story</li>
 <li>Agricultural climate: announce SOU or action plan within 30 days to neutralise Riksrevisionen finding</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-coalitiongovernment">Threats (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-coalitiongovernment">Threats (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S's "constitutional knowledge" question (HD11726) creates a rhetorical trap right as vilande amendments are debated</li>
 <li>Alum shale veto (HD11725) exposes energy-environment incoherence — C+S aligned against SD</li>
 <li>S's accelerating filing pace suggests a week-3 interpellation surge likely late April</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape">⚠️ Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape">⚠️ Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape">⚠️ Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen agricultural climate finding triggers Klimatpolitiska rådet escalation</td><td align="center">🟠 M (0.55)</td><td align="center">🔴 H (4)</td><td align="center"><strong>2.2</strong></td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S Stockholm police narrative gains media traction before Strömmer responds</td><td align="center">🟠 M (0.60)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>1.8</strong></td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S's constitutional knowledge question (HD11726) undermines education minister</td><td align="center">🟡 L (0.40)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>1.2</strong></td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU42 budget debate exposes appropriation-area structure weaknesses</td><td align="center">🟡 L (0.35)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>1.05</strong></td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Alum shale veto debate fractures coalition energy consensus</td><td align="center">🟡 L (0.30)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>0.9</strong></td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔭 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">🔭 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔭 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Justice Minister Strömmer responds to HD10439</td><td>Written question deadline (~10 days)</td><td>~April 30</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>MJU21 scheduled for plenary debate</td><td>KU committee timetable</td><td>April 28–May 5</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S files follow-up alum shale interpellation</td><td>HD11725 response quality</td><td>May 1–10</td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional knowledge minister response triggers media analysis</td><td>HD11726 response + vilande debate context</td><td>April 28–May 7</td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet comments on MJU21 findings</td><td>Publication of council review</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-artifacts-inventory">🗂️ Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-artifacts-inventory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-artifacts-inventory">🗂️ Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-artifacts-inventory"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -771,11 +771,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-artifacts-inventory">🗂️ Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Artifact</th><th>File</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Synthesis Summary</td><td>synthesis-summary.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Risk Assessment</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Threat Analysis</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Classification Results</td><td>classification-results.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Significance Scoring</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Stakeholder Perspectives</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Cross-Reference Map</td><td>cross-reference-map.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Data Download Manifest</td><td>data-download-manifest.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>README</td><td>README.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Executive Brief</td><td>executive-brief.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>Comparative International</td><td>comparative-international.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>Methodology Reflection</td><td>methodology-reflection.md</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SIG ID</strong>: <code>SIG-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:37 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points">Significance Scoring Framework (5 Dimensions × 5 Points)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points">Significance Scoring Framework (5 Dimensions × 5 Points)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -813,8 +813,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points">Significance S
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">25%</td><td>Impact on 2026 election dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">20%</td><td>Likelihood/magnitude of policy change</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">20%</td><td>Number/significance of affected groups</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">20%</td><td>Constitutional/legal/institutional significance</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">15%</td><td>Expected media attention and public resonance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-scoring">Per-Document Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-scoring"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-scoring">Per-Document Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-scoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Climate is top-3 election issue; independent audit finding amplifies credibility</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksrevisionen findings legally require government response within 6 months</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Affects all of Sweden (14% domestic GHG), farmers (~70,000), rural communities</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksrevisionen is constitutional body; finding is on official record</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksrevisionen reports routinely get front-page coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>21/25</strong></td><td><strong>High significance — publication priority</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>PUBLISH</strong></td><td>Lead story for climate/environment angle</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation">HD10439 — Brist på poliser i Stockholm (interpellation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation">HD10439 — Brist på poliser i Stockholm (interpellation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation">HD10439 — Br
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Security is #1 election issue per polling; Stockholm focus maximises salience</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Written interpellation; forces Strömmer response on record</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Stockholm = 1/4 of Swedish population; police is universal concern</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Interpellation = formal parliamentary accountability mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Police/crime stories dominate Swedish media</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>19/25</strong></td><td><strong>High significance</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>PUBLISH</strong></td><td>Frames police expansion vs quality debate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report">HD01KU42 — Indelning i utgiftsområden (committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report">HD01KU42 — Indelning i utgiftsområden (committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report">HD01KU42 —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Budget structure is technical; matters for fiscal credibility narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Debate stage — not yet voted</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Affects all taxpayers through fiscal framework</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Constitutional committee debating fundamental budget architecture</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Technical nature limits media interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>15/25</strong></td><td><strong>Medium significance</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>INCLUDE</strong></td><td>Context for fiscal accountability narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question">HD11726 — Kunskap om grundlagarna (question)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question">HD11726 — Kunskap om grundlagarna (question)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question">HD11726 — Kunskap om gru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Post-vilande amendments; constitutional awareness = election-year issue</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Written question; no immediate policy change</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">4</td><td>All citizens affected by constitutional amendments</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Post-KU33/KU32 vilande context amplifies</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Constitutional education not naturally viral; but timing matters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>16/25</strong></td><td><strong>Medium-High significance</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>INCLUDE</strong></td><td>Important constitutional accountability signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727">Collective Written Questions (HD11720–11727)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727">Collective Written Questions (HD11720–11727)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727">Collective Written Questio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Collectively demonstrate S's pre-election accountability saturation</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Individual questions rarely produce immediate policy change</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Cover multiple sectors (infrastructure, environment, justice)</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Routine parliamentary mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Individually minor; collectively signals S's pace</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>13/25 (collective)</strong></td><td><strong>Medium significance as pattern</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>CONTEXT</strong></td><td>Analyse as accountability campaign pattern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary">Overall Evening Analysis Significance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary">Overall Evening Analysis Significance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Composite Score (weighted)</strong>: 74/100
 <strong>Publication Tier</strong>: TIER-2 (High importance, immediate publication)
 <strong>Recommended Lead Story</strong>: Agricultural climate failure (MJU21) — Riksrevisionen finding strongest anchor
@@ -1062,11 +1062,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary">Overall Evening Analys
 <strong>Context Story</strong>: S accountability saturation campaign — 8 questions in one day
 <strong>Election 2026 Relevance</strong>: HIGH 🟩 — climate, security, constitutional accountability all live election issues</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>STA ID</strong>: <code>STA-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:38 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     CENTER[🇸🇪 Evening Analysis&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>Stakeholder Impact] --> CIT[👥 Citizens&#x3C;br/>HIGH]
     CENTER --> GOV[🏛️ Government Coalition&#x3C;br/>MIXED — under pressure]
@@ -1086,8 +1086,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     style JUD fill:#1B5E20,color:#fff
     style MED fill:#E91E63,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups">Stakeholder Analysis — All 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups">Stakeholder Analysis — All 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Election 2026 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Monday's parliamentary activity touches three of the top voter concerns: security (police), environment (agricultural climate), and infrastructure (Carlson's portfolio). The HD10439 Stockholm police interpellation directly affects the 970,000 Stockholm municipality residents who experience the policing gap daily. The MJU21 agricultural climate finding affects both urban consumers (food prices, sustainability expectations) and rural citizens (farming communities). HD11726's constitutional knowledge question affects all 7.7 million eligible voters ahead of the first "constitutional election" in modern Swedish history.</p>
 <p><strong>Specific citizen groups affected</strong>:</p>
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" h
 <li>Trafikverket NGO beneficiaries: HD11722 (civil society cuts)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">2. Government Coalition (M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">2. Government Coalition (M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH (adverse) | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Actor-specific analysis</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">2. Government Coalitio
 <li><strong>Energy Minister Johan Britz/Romina Pourmokhtari (L)</strong>: HD11720 + HD11725 on climate/environment</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c">3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c">3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH (positive) | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Actor-specific analysis</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c">3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)<a
 <li><strong>C (Rickard Nordin, Mikael Larsson)</strong>: Two questions (HD11720, HD11721) on environment and rural policy — positions C as pragmatic environmental actor</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: MEDIUM | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Medium-term | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Farming sector</strong> (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund, LRF): MJU21 agricultural climate transition — mixed. Riksrevisionen finding documents state insufficiency, which LRF will use to argue for better government support rather than regulatory pressure</li>
@@ -1133,7 +1133,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>NGOs/civil society organisations</strong>: HD11722 — Trafikverket cuts to ideella organisationer; S's Ödebrink questioning signals political support for civil society funding</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Medium | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Environmental NGOs</strong> (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF): MJU21 agricultural climate finding = major advocacy victory; validates campaigns against agricultural emissions</li>
@@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 <li><strong>Constitutional civil society</strong> (Transparency International, Myndigheten för press, tv och radio): HD11726 + vilande amendments — constitutional knowledge gap is exactly their mandate</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: LOW-MEDIUM | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Medium | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EU Commission</strong>: MJU21 agricultural climate — Sweden's Riksrevisionen finding will be noted in EU's review of member-state CAP compliance and climate transition progress</li>
@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>EU pay transparency</strong>: From sibling analysis IP437 — Sweden's failure to implement EU directive creates EU infringement risk</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Riksrevisionen</strong>: MJU21 is its own finding — the constitutional body will monitor government response; if no action within 6 months, can escalate</li>
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet</strong>: Independent council mandated by Klimatlagen; MJU21 + HD03236 fuel tax cut combination is exactly the type of policy inconsistency the council monitors</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Expected media framing</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1176,11 +1176,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden
 <li>Constitutional awareness: Only 34% of Swedes can name all five fundamental laws (Demoskop 2024) — HD11726 identifies a real gap</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Horizon</strong>: Tomorrow / 7-day / 30-day</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-three-base-scenarios">Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability">Scenario A: Government Containment (35% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios">Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability">Scenario A: Government Containment (35% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Label</strong>: "Strömmer Responds, Svantesson Pivots"
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Justice Minister Strömmer issues a strong HD10439 response citing HD03237 (paid training) as the structural answer to Stockholm police distribution gaps. The Climate/Agriculture Ministry announces an agricultural emissions action plan within 14 days of the MJU21 debate. The Education Ministry's HD11726 response references a new constitutional literacy campaign timed to coincide with the election. The government successfully frames the week as "accountable governance responding to legitimate questions."</p>
@@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability">Scenario A: Governm
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: This scenario requires coordinated ministerial communications — possible given the government's Spring Fiscal package discipline, but the agricultural response timeline is tight.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability">Scenario B: S Accountability Gains Traction (50% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability">Scenario B: S Accountability Gains Traction (50% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Label</strong>: "The Double Climate Indictment"
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: MJU21 becomes the lead story in DN/SvD on April 21, framed as "Riksrevisionen: Sverige klarar inte jordbrukets klimatomställning." This is combined with reporting that the government simultaneously cut fuel taxes (HD03236), adding emissions. S's Magdalena Andersson holds a press conference citing both Riksrevisionen findings and the motions already filed (HD024082, HD024098). The police interpellation (HD10439) generates secondary coverage on Stockholm-specific policing gaps. The government's response window is 10 days but the media narrative is already set.</p>
@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability">Scenario B
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: This is the base case. S's filing discipline and the independent Riksrevisionen anchor make it structurally likely.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability">Scenario C: Constitutional Accountability Week (15% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability">Scenario C: Constitutional Accountability Week (15% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Label</strong>: "Four Documents, One Theme: Who Controls the State?"
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟥LOW-MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The KU42 budget structure debate, the KU33/KU32 vilande amendments, the HD11726 constitutional knowledge question, and the announced KU summons of Finance Minister Svantesson (from realtime memory) combine into a unified "constitutional accountability week" narrative. Media frames the week as "who controls Sweden's constitutional architecture?" HD11726 becomes a viral talking point about the government changing the constitution without citizen education.</p>
@@ -1217,8 +1217,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability">Scenari
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: Requires media and opposition coordination to land the combined narrative. Possible but not structurally pre-determined.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-two-wildcards">Two Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-wildcards"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response">Wildcard 1: Klimatpolitiska rådet Rapid Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-two-wildcards">Two Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-wildcards"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response">Wildcard 1: Klimatpolitiska rådet Rapid Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 0.25 | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: 🔴CRITICAL</p>
 <p>The independent climate policy council issues an urgent statement on the MJU21 + fuel tax cut combination within 7 days. This would:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1227,11 +1227,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response">Wildcard 1: Klimatp
 <li>Elevate the story from parliamentary-level to constitutional-level accountability</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents">Wildcard 2: KU Summons Reveal Sensitive Budget Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents">Wildcard 2: KU Summons Reveal Sensitive Budget Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 0.20 | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: 🟠HIGH</p>
 <p>The KU summons of Finance Minister Svantesson (flagged in realtime memory for this week) produces unexpected revelations about budgetary decision-making processes. If Svantesson's testimony on the Spring Economic Bill (HD03100) or the extra amendment budget (HD03236) reveals internal disagreements or rushed decision-making, the climate-fiscal accountability narrative widens.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses">ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses">ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses">ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th align="center">Scenario A</th><th align="center">Scenario B</th><th align="center">Scenario C</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1: Media leads with MJU21 tomorrow</td><td align="center">Contradicts</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>H2: S holds climate press conference by April 23</td><td align="center">Contradicts</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>H3: Government announces agricultural action plan by May 1</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Contradicts</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>H4: KU summons produces significant Svantesson testimony</td><td align="center">Neutral</td><td align="center">Neutral</td><td align="center">Supports</td></tr><tr><td>H5: Strömmer cites HD03237 in HD10439 response</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Neutral</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-30-day-forward-indicators">30-Day Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-30-day-forward-indicators">30-Day Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1318,12 +1318,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-30-day-forward-indicators">30-Day Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Expected Date</th><th align="center">Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MJU21 plenary debate</td><td align="center">April 28–May 5</td><td align="center">S/MP/C amplification opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439 Strömmer response</td><td align="center">~April 30</td><td align="center">Government defence of police record</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural climate action plan</td><td align="center">May 1–20</td><td align="center">Government damage control</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet comment</td><td align="center">May–June</td><td align="center">Independent escalation</td></tr><tr><td>S week-3 interpellation surge</td><td align="center">April 28–May 5</td><td align="center">New target portfolios likely</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission climate review</td><td align="center">May–June</td><td align="center">Sweden's CAP compliance assessment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>RSK ID</strong>: <code>RSK-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:34 UTC
 <strong>Risk Framework</strong>: Likelihood × Impact (L×I scoring, 0.1–5.0)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Evening Analysis 2026-04-20
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -1341,8 +1341,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     Carlson portfolio deterioration: [0.70, 0.55]
     S interpellation surge week 3: [0.72, 0.62]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation">Risk 1: Riksrevisionen Agricultural Climate Finding Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation">Risk 1: Riksrevisionen Agricultural Climate Finding Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-001
 <strong>Category</strong>: Policy/Regulatory
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD01MJU21 (MJU21 committee report)</p>
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation">Risk 1
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Riksrevisionen's MJU21 report documents that Sweden's state efforts for agricultural climate transition are insufficient. Agriculture represents ~14% of Sweden's domestic GHG emissions. If Klimatpolitiska rådet (the independent climate policy council) issues a follow-up comment — which it does routinely for Riksrevisionen findings — the damage to government's climate credibility will be officially compounded. Combined with the fuel tax cut (HD03236, adding +0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e), Sweden faces a two-front climate accountability challenge.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Announce an agricultural climate action plan (SOU or government consultation) within 30 days. This would transform the Riksrevisionen finding from a liability into a demonstrated government responsiveness.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction">Risk 2: S Stockholm Police Narrative Gains Media Traction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction">Risk 2: S Stockholm Police Narrative Gains Media Traction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-002
 <strong>Category</strong>: Political/Reputational
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD10439 (interpellation by Mattias Vepsä, S → Gunnar Strömmer, M)</p>
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction">Risk 2: S S
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: S's Mattias Vepsä targets Justice Minister Strömmer on the BRÅ evaluation of the 10,000-police-officer goal. The BRÅ confirmed the numerical target was met — but Vepsä's framing focuses on Stockholm-specific distribution and quality concerns. The government's most defensible position (met the headline number) is also its most vulnerable: it invites the question "why are Stockholm residents still experiencing police shortages?" The new paid-training proposition (HD03237) is the government's structural answer — but HD03237 won't produce trained officers until 2028 at earliest.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Strömmer should cite HD03237 proactively in HD10439 response, present Stockholm deployment data, and announce regional allocation review.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april">Risk 3: S Interpellation Surge Week 3 (Late April)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april">Risk 3: S Interpellation Surge Week 3 (Late April)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-003
 <strong>Category</strong>: Political/Parliamentary
 <strong>Source</strong>: Pattern analysis — motions (21 in 6 days), interpellations (7 in 6 days), questions (8 today)</p>
@@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april">Risk 3: S Interpella
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: S is filing at ~50% above its session average pace. The documented pattern in the interpellation analysis (April 14–17: 7 new S interpellations) plus today's 8 written questions suggests the party is in a high-output pre-election documentation phase. With the Riksdag approaching its final sessions before summer recess, each question/interpellation locks in ministerial response records. A week-3 surge (late April) could include 3–5 new interpellations targeting Carlson, Strömmer, Larsson, and potentially Prime Minister Kristersson directly.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Government communications team should triage incoming questions, prepare comprehensive responses for the most politically salient topics, and consider proactive press conference preemption on key portfolios.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale">Risk 4: Coalition Energy/Environment Fracture on Alum Shale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale">Risk 4: Coalition Energy/Environment Fracture on Alum Shale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-004
 <strong>Category</strong>: Coalition Stability
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD11725 (question on municipal veto on alum shale mining)</p>
@@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale">Risk 4: Co
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Attribute</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Likelihood</strong></td><td>0.30 (LOW-MEDIUM)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Impact</strong></td><td>3 (MEDIUM — exposes Tidö coalition environmental limits)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L×I Score</strong></td><td><strong>0.9</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Velocity</strong></td><td>Slow (depends on government response to HD11725 and broader mining policy debate)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Centerpartiet (C) and S are aligned on municipal veto rights for alum shale extraction. SD is presumed to support mineral extraction for economic reasons. This creates a potential C-vs-SD tension within the Tidö coalition framework. While alum shale is not a first-tier election issue, it is a microcosm of the broader environmental tension that could widen.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726">Risk 5: Constitutional Knowledge Trap (HD11726)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726">Risk 5: Constitutional Knowledge Trap (HD11726)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-005
 <strong>Category</strong>: Reputational/Institutional
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD11726 (question on Kunskap om grundlagarna by Eva Lindh, S → Education Minister Mohammso)</p>
@@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726">Risk 5: Constitutional
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Attribute</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Likelihood</strong></td><td>0.40 (LOW-MEDIUM)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Impact</strong></td><td>3 (MEDIUM — damages constitutional reform credibility)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L×I Score</strong></td><td><strong>1.2</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Velocity</strong></td><td>Medium (answer expected within 14 days)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: S's Eva Lindh asks what the government is doing to improve citizen knowledge of the Swedish constitution — timed precisely one week after the Riksdag adopted two vilande constitutional amendments (KU33 on police seizure secrecy and KU32 on media accessibility). If the Education Ministry's answer is weak or non-committal, it will be used to argue the government is changing the constitution without adequately informing citizens — a powerful democratic accountability argument.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment">Coalition Stability Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment">Coalition Stability Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     M[Moderaterna&#x3C;br/>PM Kristersson] -->|Confidence &#x26; Supply| SD[Sverigedemokraterna]
     M --> KD[Kristdemokraterna]
@@ -1542,12 +1542,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment">Coalition Stability Risk Assessm
 <strong>Key Vulnerability</strong>: KD (Andreas Carlson infrastructure portfolio) and L (Nina Larsson gender equality portfolio)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SWOT ID</strong>: <code>SWT-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:33 UTC
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Full-day synthesis — committee reports, interpellations, written questions</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Evening Analysis&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>SWOT))
     Strengths
@@ -1609,64 +1609,64 @@ <h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
         SD pro-extraction vs C+S vs MP
         Could expose Tidö coalition environmental limits</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">Coalition SWOT (Tidö: M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">Coalition SWOT (Tidö: M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Police delivery</strong>: BRÅ confirmed 10,000 officers target met — rare example of government delivering on a precise numerical commitment. Strömmer can invoke this against HD10439 <code>[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Energy reform package</strong>: The sibling proposition analysis confirms HD03239/240/238 deliver a coherent industrial policy — positive contrast to the climate-only narrative opposition prefers <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>NATO credibility</strong>: HD03220 (EFP Finland) and Ukraine accountability measures (HD03231/32) place Sweden firmly in the mainstream European security architecture <code>[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal package</strong>: Three budget propositions (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236) provide election-year economic narrative <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Agricultural climate</strong>: MJU21/Riksrevisionen creates an official record that cannot be redacted. Agriculture = 14% of domestic GHG; documented insufficiency joins fuel tax cut as climate credibility damage <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Stockholm policing</strong>: Quantitative goal vs qualitative/geographic distribution gap — S's framing exposes the limitation of headline-number politics <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>KD infrastructure</strong>: Carlson's portfolio is consistently identified as weakest in coalition; KD cannot afford to lose further seats to M or S <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Alum shale position</strong>: SD's presumed support for mineral extraction puts it at odds with C (coalition-adjacent) and S on HD11725 — a microcosm of wider environmental coalition tension <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Agricultural action plan</strong>: A rapid announcement of an SOU or consultation process would transform MJU21 from a liability to a response. Window is April 20–May 10 before Riksdag recess discussions begin <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional leadership</strong>: KU42 debate on budget structure — if the government champions transparent fiscal architecture, it takes the lead narrative away from opposition <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Police quality follow-up</strong>: Address Stockholm distribution concern proactively in Strömmer's HD10439 response — cite HD03237 as the structural solution <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet escalation</strong>: The council is independent; MJU21 finding likely triggers a council review comment in May–June 2026, amplifying the damage <code>[MEDIUM-HIGH confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>HD11726 constitutional trap</strong>: The Education Ministry will have to answer "what is being done to increase constitutional knowledge among citizens?" — any weak answer will be weaponised as the vilande amendments make the constitution a live election issue <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>S filing momentum</strong>: The week-over-week escalation in S's parliamentary activity (motions, interpellations, written questions) is structurally concerning — Riksdag summer recess approaches, each filed question locks in a ministerial record <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c">Opposition SWOT (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c">Opposition SWOT (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Documented government failures</strong>: MJU21 provides an independent audit authority's finding — more durable than political accusations <code>[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Coordinated accountability campaign</strong>: S's simultaneous coverage of infrastructure, justice, energy, education, and climate demonstrates portfolio breadth that suggests S is ready to govern <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Climate narrative coherence</strong>: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) + agricultural climate failure (MJU21) + MJU25 (forthcoming) = a layered, multi-front climate case <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S silent on deportation</strong> (from motions analysis): S's revealed strategic choice to avoid the security-enforcement immigration narrative limits coalition-building credibility on the right <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>V+MP electoral risk</strong>: Their arms-export and immigration positions poll poorly with median voter <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>S must own economic failure too</strong>: Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth and 8.69% unemployment happened under conditions S did not fully prevent when in government 2014–2022 <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>MJU21 amplification</strong>: Bring Riksrevisionen finding to media at first plenary debate opportunity <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>HD11726 timing</strong>: Constitutional knowledge debate immediately post-vilande amendments is symbolically perfect for S <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government pays its debts</strong>: If Strömmer, Carlson, and other ministers respond substantively to the written question wave, the accountability saturation tactic loses impact <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Election fatigue</strong>: Voters may tune out escalating accountability campaigns if not tied to vivid personal stories <code>[LOW confidence 🟥]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>THR ID</strong>: <code>THR-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:35 UTC
 <strong>Framework</strong>: STRIDE + Political Threat Taxonomy</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[⚠️ Evening Analysis&#x3C;br/>Threat Taxonomy&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20] --> T1
     ROOT --> T2
@@ -1689,8 +1689,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidd
     style T5 fill:#4A148C,color:#fff
     style T6 fill:#0D47A1,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-category-analysis">Threat Category Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-1-constitutional-threats">Category 1: Constitutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-constitutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-category-analysis">Threat Category Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-1-constitutional-threats">Category 1: Constitutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-constitutional-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 3/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-1-constitutional-threats">Category 1: Constitutional Threats
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget appropriation scrutiny exposes fiscal structural weaknesses</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">April–May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional knowledge deficit legitimises opposition campaign</td><td>HD11726</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">April–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Vilande amendments pass without citizen awareness</td><td>KU33+KU32 context</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">Pre-election 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The constitutional threat cluster centres on the government's management of its constitutional reform agenda. The two vilande amendments (KU33 on police seizure secrecy, KU32 on media accessibility) are legitimate democratic instruments — but passing them without a parallel public education campaign creates a democratic legitimacy question that S's Eva Lindh (HD11726) is expertly exploiting. The Education Ministry's response will be scrutinised.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats">Category 2: Climate/Environment Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats">Category 2: Climate/Environment Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 4/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats">Category 2: Climate/Environmen
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen agricultural climate finding triggers council review</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cut + agricultural failure = documented double standard</td><td>HD03236 + MJU21</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">April–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal alum shale veto fractures C-SD coalition alignment</td><td>HD11725</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">May–July 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The climate threat is the most strategically significant for the 2026 election. The MJU21 finding is produced by an independent constitutional body (Riksrevisionen) whose findings carry legal weight under the Swedish riksrevision framework. Unlike political accusations, this finding will appear in official parliament records. Combined with the fuel tax cut (a proactive government choice to increase emissions), the opposition has constructed a two-source, independently-verified climate credibility challenge.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats">Category 3: Security/Rule of Law Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats">Category 3: Security/Rule of Law Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 3/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats">Category 3: Security/Rule of
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Stockholm police deficit becomes headline story</td><td>HD10439</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">April 21 – May 5</td></tr><tr><td>Gang recruitment crisis continues despite police expansion</td><td>Policy context</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>Paid police training delayed implementation risk</td><td>HD03237</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">2027–2028</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The police threat is primarily electoral rather than operational. The operational situation (10,000 officers) is better than 2022 but the qualitative/geographic distribution argument is legitimate. S's Vepsä (HD10439) is sophisticated: targeting Stockholm specifically forces Strömmer to defend not just national numbers but the most politically salient urban constituency.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-4-economic-threats">Category 4: Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-economic-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-4-economic-threats">Category 4: Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-economic-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 4/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-4-economic-threats">Category 4: Economic Threats<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth gap vs Nordic peers closes too slowly</td><td>Propositions context</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">2026 election</td></tr><tr><td>Spring Economic Bill credibility window narrows as election approaches</td><td>HD03100</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center">May–September</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment 8.69% remains above Nordic peers</td><td>World Bank data</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">Persistent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The economic threat is the background condition against which all other threats are amplified. With Sweden growing at 0.82% vs Denmark (3.48%) and Norway (2.10%), the government cannot easily claim economic management success. The Spring Amendment Budget (HD03236) fuel tax cut is explicitly designed to close the "feel-good" gap — but if voters perceive it as electoral rather than structural, its impact is diminished.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats">Category 5: Coalition Stability Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats">Category 5: Coalition Stability Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 3/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats">Category 5: Coalition Stabili
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KD infrastructure portfolio continues to deteriorate</td><td>Carlson 6th+ IP</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">April–May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>L gender equality failures damage liberal-values brand</td><td>IP437+438</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">April–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>SD-C-L tension on environment/culture policies</td><td>HD11725 + broader</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">Spring session</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats">Category 6: Democratic Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats">Category 6: Democratic Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 2/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 
 
@@ -1910,17 +1910,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats">Category 6: Democratic Integ
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional amendments passed without public awareness campaign</td><td>KU33/KU32 vilande</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center">Pre-election</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition exploits knowledge gap for delegitimisation</td><td>HD11726</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">April–September</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The democratic integrity threat is primarily reputational rather than operational. Sweden's constitutional process (vilande amendments) is legally sound. The risk is that the government fails to communicate adequately what the amendments mean, allowing the opposition to frame them as secretive constitutional changes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-assessment">Overall Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-assessment">Overall Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence level</strong>: Threat near MEDIUM-HIGH (2026-04-20 evening)</p>
 <p>The dominant threat cluster is the <strong>climate accountability compound</strong> (MJU21 + HD03236 + HD11725) — independently verified, multi-front, and aligned with three opposition parties (S, MP, C). The secondary threat is the <strong>parliamentary saturation campaign</strong> — S's escalating filing pace is structurally asymmetric in that the government must respond to every question while S pays no cost for filing.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's Swedish parliamentary activity — Riksrevisionen agricultural climate failure, police quality accountability, and constitutional scrutiny — has direct parallels across Nordic and EU peers.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks">Jurisdiction Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator">1. Denmark 🇩🇰 — Agricultural Climate Transition (Lead Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks">Jurisdiction Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator">1. Denmark 🇩🇰 — Agricultural Climate Transition (Lead Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD01MJU21 agricultural climate findings</p>
 <p>Denmark is the most direct comparator for Sweden's agricultural climate challenge. In 2021, Denmark adopted the world's first comprehensive <strong>agricultural climate plan</strong>, including:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1931,14 +1931,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator">1. Denma
 <p><strong>Sweden vs. Denmark contrast</strong>: Denmark GDP growth 3.48% (2024) vs. Sweden 0.82% — yet Denmark can afford more ambitious agricultural climate spending. Sweden's Riksrevisionen finding that state efforts are "insufficient" places Sweden materially behind Denmark in agricultural climate governance.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Danish Ministry of Environment and Food confirmed targets 2022–2024.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator">2. Finland 🇫🇮 — Police Resource Distribution (Security Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator">2. Finland 🇫🇮 — Police Resource Distribution (Security Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD10439 Stockholm police shortage</p>
 <p>Finland's police reform (2013–2016) provides a cautionary tale for Sweden's HD10439 situation. Finland merged 24 police districts into 11, <strong>reducing operational presence in smaller cities while concentrating resources in Helsinki</strong>. The result was: improved response times in Helsinki (+8%) but <strong>rural policing deterioration</strong> that required emergency reversal 2019–2021.</p>
 <p>Sweden faces an analogous challenge: meeting the national 10,000-officer target (BRÅ confirmed) while Stockholm residents report visible patrol gaps. Finland's experience suggests that numerical targets without geographic distribution requirements produce structural metropolitan gaps.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy implication</strong>: HD03237 (paid police training) should include Stockholm-specific deployment allocation — as Denmark did when expanding Copenhagen police 2019.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Finnish National Police Board annual reports 2014–2022.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent">3. Germany 🇩🇪 — Fuel Tax / Climate Hypocrisy Precedent<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent">3. Germany 🇩🇪 — Fuel Tax / Climate Hypocrisy Precedent<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD03236 fuel tax + MJU21 compound</p>
 <p>Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt (fuel tax cut, €3 billion, June–August 2022) is the direct European precedent for Sweden's HD03236. Key findings:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent">3. Germany 🇩
 <p><strong>Direct implication</strong>: Sweden's HD03236 fuel tax cut is following a well-documented European precedent that shows (a) limited electoral payoff and (b) measurable emissions cost. The MJU21 Riksrevisionen finding adds a third independently-documented climate accountability item to the same government's record.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — German Umweltbundesamt 2023, DIW Berlin 2022.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model">4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Constitutional Education Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model">4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Constitutional Education Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD11726 constitutional knowledge question</p>
 <p>Norway has a relatively strong model for constitutional civic education. In connection with the 2014 bicentenary of the Norwegian constitution, Norway launched:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model">4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Con
 <p><strong>Policy recommendation</strong>: Sweden's Education Ministry HD11726 response should reference Norway's bicentenary model as a blueprint for a 2026 election-year constitutional literacy campaign.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM — Norwegian Ministry of Education reporting 2014–2020.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation">5. Netherlands 🇳🇱 — Audit Authority Climate Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation">5. Netherlands 🇳🇱 — Audit Authority Climate Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: MJU21 Riksrevisionen finding escalation risk</p>
 <p>The Netherlands' Algemene Rekenkamer (national audit court) issued a climate-transition finding in 2022 on agricultural emissions — and the institutional response provides a blueprint for Sweden:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1974,13 +1974,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation">5. Netherlands 
 <p><strong>Warning for Sweden</strong>: Swedish LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) will use MJU21 to demand better government support; Swedish environmental NGOs will use it to demand stricter regulation. The government faces simultaneous pressure from both directions — exactly as the Dutch experienced 2021–2023.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Algemene Rekenkamer 2022, Dutch Parliamentary Record 2022–2023.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference">6. EU Level — Pay Transparency Directive (Cross-Reference)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference">6. EU Level — Pay Transparency Directive (Cross-Reference)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: From sibling interpellation analysis (IP437 — EU pay transparency directive failure)</p>
 <p>Sweden's documented failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970) on time is a compliance failure visible at EU level. The directive requires implementation by June 7, 2026. Sweden withdrew its implementation proposal (frs 2025/26:437 confirms). EU infringement proceedings typically take 12–18 months to reach formal decision — but the <strong>political embarrassment</strong> of being called out at EU institutions before September 13, 2026 is a live risk.</p>
 <p><strong>EU peer comparison</strong>: Of 27 member states, 19 have submitted implementation plans. Sweden and Hungary are the only member states to have withdrawn submitted plans. This is an unusual position for a country with a strong gender equality record.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — EU Commission transposition tracker 2025.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-scorecard">Summary Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-scorecard">Summary Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2030,11 +2030,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-scorecard">Summary Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Area</th><th align="center">Sweden's Position</th><th align="center">Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Agricultural climate</td><td align="center">Behind</td><td align="center">Significant (5+ years)</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>Police distribution</td><td align="center">Risk ahead</td><td align="center">Comparable challenge</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Fuel tax relief</td><td align="center">Following failed precedent</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>Constitutional education</td><td align="center">Behind</td><td align="center">Moderate</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>Audit escalation risk</td><td align="center">Comparable risk profile</td><td align="center">Monitor closely</td></tr><tr><td>EU</td><td>Pay transparency</td><td align="center">Non-compliant (rare)</td><td align="center">Critical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CLS ID</strong>: <code>CLS-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:36 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[📋 Document Classification&#x3C;br/>Evening Analysis 2026-04-20] --> Q1{Personal data?}
     Q1 -->|No| Q2{Security sensitive?}
@@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-
     PUBLIC --> IP439_C[HD10439 — Police interpellation]
     PUBLIC --> FRAG_C[HD11720–11727 — Written questions]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2175,7 +2175,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Type</th><th align="center">Sensitivity</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Publication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>bet (KU)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional/Fiscal</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">PUBLISH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>bet (KU)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional/Ceremonial</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">MENTION</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>bet (MJU)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Environment/Agriculture</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">PUBLISH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>ip (S→M)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Security/Police</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">PUBLISH</td></tr><tr><td>HD11720</td><td>fr (C→L)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Environment/Industry</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11721</td><td>fr (C→KD)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Rural Development</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11722</td><td>fr (S→KD-Infrastructure)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Infrastructure/Civil Society</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11723</td><td>fr (SD→Industry)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Transport/Technology</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11724</td><td>fr (S→KD-Infrastructure)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Transport Safety</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11725</td><td>fr (S→Energy)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Energy/Environment</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>fr (S→Education)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional/Education</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">INCLUDE</td></tr><tr><td>HD11727</td><td>fr (S→Justice)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Justice/Administration</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2218,17 +2218,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Policy Domain</th><th align="center">Documents</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Election Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Environment/Climate</td><td align="center">HD01MJU21, HD11720, HD11725</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Security/Justice/Police</td><td align="center">HD10439, HD11727</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">HD01KU42, HD01KU43, HD11726</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Infrastructure/Transport</td><td align="center">HD11722, HD11723, HD11724</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Rural/Agriculture/Energy</td><td align="center">HD11721, HD11725</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-urgency-classification">Urgency Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-urgency-classification">Urgency Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-classification"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Critical (respond within 24h)</strong>: None
 <strong>High (respond within 48–72h)</strong>: HD10439, HD01MJU21
 <strong>Medium (respond within 7 days)</strong>: HD01KU42, HD11726, HD11722, HD11724, HD11725
 <strong>Low (routine response)</strong>: HD01KU43, HD11720, HD11721, HD11723, HD11727</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>XRF ID</strong>: <code>XRF-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:39 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "🌱 Climate Cluster"
         MJU21[HD01MJU21&#x3C;br/>Agricultural climate&#x3C;br/>Riksrevisionen]
@@ -2277,7 +2277,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" a
     style KU33 fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     style FR726 fill:#1565C0,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2362,28 +2362,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>This Document</th><th>Related Document</th><th>Relationship</th><th>Source</th><th>Type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>HD03236</td><td>MJU21 finding amplifies HD03236 climate hypocrisy</td><td>Sibling: PROP</td><td>Policy compound</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>HD024082</td><td>S motion (Damberg) cites same climate concern</td><td>Sibling: MOT</td><td>Opposition alignment</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>HD024098</td><td>MP motion (Alm Ericson) cites same climate concern</td><td>Sibling: MOT</td><td>Opposition alignment</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>HD03237</td><td>HD03237 is government's structural answer to HD10439 gap</td><td>Sibling: PROP</td><td>Policy response</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>HD10437</td><td>Previous S police interpellation (April 17); same minister</td><td>Sibling: IP</td><td>Escalation pattern</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Spring Economic Bill — KU42 debates appropriation structure against which HD03100 operates</td><td>Sibling: PROP</td><td>Constitutional link</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Constitutional knowledge question directly follows vilande passage of KU33</td><td>Sibling: CR</td><td>Temporal link</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional knowledge question directly follows vilande passage of KU32</td><td>Sibling: CR</td><td>Temporal link</td></tr><tr><td>HD11722</td><td>HD11724</td><td>Both filed by Ödebrink (S), both target Minister Carlson's infrastructure portfolio</td><td>Same day</td><td>Coordinated questions</td></tr><tr><td>HD11725</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Alum shale question + S's fuel tax motion = C+S environmental alignment</td><td>Sibling: MOT</td><td>Coalition rehearsal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound">Cluster A: Climate-Accountability Compound<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound">Cluster A: Climate-Accountability Compound<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🔴CRITICAL</p>
 <p>Connects: MJU21 (Riksrevisionen) ↔ HD03236 (fuel tax) ↔ MOT024082+98 (S+MP counter-motions) ↔ HD11725 (alum shale)</p>
 <p>This cluster represents the most structurally damaging accountability compound for the government. Three independently-sourced challenges to climate credibility, with an independent constitutional body (Riksrevisionen) as the primary anchor.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate">Cluster B: Police Security Debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate">Cluster B: Police Security Debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🔴HIGH</p>
 <p>Connects: HD10439 (new IP) ↔ HD10437 (previous IP) ↔ HD03237 (paid training)</p>
 <p>The police security debate has been running since April 15. HD10439 adds Stockholm specificity — from "national police numbers" to "where are the police in Stockholm?"</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain">Cluster C: Constitutional Awareness Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain">Cluster C: Constitutional Awareness Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🟠HIGH</p>
 <p>Connects: KU33+KU32 vilande ↔ KU42 budget scrutiny ↔ HD11726 constitutional knowledge</p>
 <p>The constitutional awareness chain creates a coherent pre-election narrative: government is changing the constitution (KU33/KU32), managing the fiscal framework (KU42), but not educating citizens about what the constitution is (HD11726).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability">Cluster D: Infrastructure Carlson Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability">Cluster D: Infrastructure Carlson Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🟠MEDIUM</p>
 <p>Connects: HD11722 ↔ HD11724 ↔ IP434 (sibling interpellation on housing starts)</p>
 <p>S is maintaining consistent pressure on Infrastructure Minister Carlson across multiple parliamentary instruments. Written questions, interpellations — the approach is multi-layered.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Analysis Version</strong>: v5.0 | <strong>Depth</strong>: deep</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2469,8 +2469,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Method</th><th align="center">Applied</th><th align="center">Quality</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Per-file analysis (v5.0)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>14 documents analyzed with specific citations</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT (8 stakeholder groups)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All 8 groups in stakeholder-perspectives.md</td></tr><tr><td>Risk matrix (L×I numeric)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>5 risks scored, heat map generated</td></tr><tr><td>Threat taxonomy (6 categories)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All 6 categories with severity and probability</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-reference map</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>4 thematic clusters, 10 cross-reference links</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario analysis (3 base + 2 wildcards)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>ACH grid populated</td></tr><tr><td>International comparative</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>6 jurisdictions benchmarked</td></tr><tr><td>Election 2026 lens</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>In synthesis-summary, SWOT, significance-scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labels on all claims</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>[HIGH]/[MEDIUM]/[LOW] throughout</td></tr><tr><td>Mermaid diagrams</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>≥2 per artifact (synthesis, risk, threat, SWOT)</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence tables with dok_ids</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All primary documents cited by dok_id</td></tr><tr><td>Forward indicators with triggers</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>≥5 indicators with dates</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17">Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17">Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Key watchpoints from previous run</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17">Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint (from 2026-04-17)</th><th align="center">Status Today (2026-04-20)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU constitutional summons of Finance Minister Svantesson</td><td align="center">🟧 IMMINENT</td><td>Realtime memory confirms KU hearing flagged for this week</td></tr><tr><td>EU-SUMMIT-20260422 preparation</td><td align="center">🟩 ON TRACK</td><td>Government Lebanon humanitarian aid (press release) shows active foreign policy</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21 committee report publication</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td>MJU21 published today as expected</td></tr><tr><td>S interpellation acceleration (wave-2)</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td>8 written questions + 1 interpellation today; pace 50%+ above average</td></tr><tr><td>Bernadotte diplomatic sensitivity (IP435)</td><td align="center">🟡 PENDING</td><td>No government response yet; April 30 deadline</td></tr><tr><td>Women's shelter closures narrative</td><td align="center">🟡 ONGOING</td><td>No new documents today but background risk remains</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428">Realtime Monitor Watchpoints (2026-04-20 earlier run — realtime-1428)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428">Realtime Monitor Watchpoints (2026-04-20 earlier run — realtime-1428)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>From memory: lead story "KU Summons Finance Minister Svantesson"</strong></p>
 
 
@@ -2546,7 +2546,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428">R
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th align="center">This Evening's Relevance</th><th align="center">Resolution</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU constitutional accountability week</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td align="center">KU42 published today; constitutional scrutiny dominant theme</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21 as top agenda item</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td align="center">MJU21 is our #1 significance finding</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439 police interpellation (new)</td><td align="center">🟩 NEW TODAY</td><td align="center">Added to analysis as major finding</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition acceleration pre-EU Summit</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td align="center">8 questions today confirms pre-EU Summit pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419">Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 14–19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419">Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 14–19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2584,8 +2584,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419">Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 1
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Spring Economic Bill media narrative</td><td align="center">🟧 EVOLVING</td><td>GDP gap (0.82% vs Denmark 3.48%) remains problematic</td></tr><tr><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive failure</td><td align="center">🟩 DOCUMENTED</td><td>In sibling interpellation analysis (IP437)</td></tr><tr><td>4-party immigration coordination signal</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td>Motions analysis confirms election campaign architecture</td></tr><tr><td>NATO/Ukraine accountability (HD03231/232)</td><td align="center">🟩 PASSED</td><td>Cross-party support confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Women's shelters closure (IP438)</td><td align="center">🟡 PENDING</td><td>Larsson response still pending</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial-draft">Pass 1 (Initial draft)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial-draft"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1-initial-draft">Pass 1 (Initial draft)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial-draft"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Initial analysis focused primarily on individual document summaries</li>
 <li>Risk scoring was initially 3 risks; expanded to 5 after reading cross-reference patterns</li>
@@ -2593,12 +2593,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial-draft">Pass 1 (Initial draft)<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Scenario analysis initially only 2 scenarios; third "constitutional week" scenario added after cross-referencing HD11726 with KU33/KU32 context</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:31 UTC
 <strong>Analysis Type</strong>: evening-analysis
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Workflow</strong>: news-evening-analysis</p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong>: 14</p>
 
 
@@ -2711,13 +2711,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Title</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>bet</td><td>KU</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>bet</td><td>KU</td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>bet</td><td>MJU</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser för jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>ip</td><td>—</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD11720</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Svensk lagstiftning om återvinning av kabel</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11721</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Fortsatt lokal förankring i Leader</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11722</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Trafikverkets minskade anslag till ideella organisationer</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11723</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Sveriges agerande kring EU-godkännande av självkörande fordonsteknik</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11724</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Transportstyrelsens olycksdatabas Strada</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11725</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Utredningen om kommunalt veto mot brytning i alunskiffer</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Kunskap om grundlagarna</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11727</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Statens servicecenters möjlighet att vidimera passkopior</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726-1</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Kunskap om grundlagarna (svar)</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11727-1</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Passkopior (svar)</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering MCP: get_betankanden, get_interpellationer, get_fragor</li>
 <li>Sibling analysis cross-references: committeeReports, propositions, motions, interpellations</li>
 <li>Government press releases (g0v.se): Sverige ökar humanitärt stöd till Libanon (2026-04-19)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-completeness-assessment">Completeness Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-completeness-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-completeness-assessment">Completeness Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-completeness-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core committee reports</strong>: 3/3 (KU42, KU43, MJU21) — HIGH completeness</li>
 <li><strong>Interpellations (new)</strong>: 1/1 (HD10439) — HIGH completeness</li>
@@ -2725,10 +2725,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-completeness-assessment">Completeness Assessment<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>Sibling analysis integrated</strong>: committeeReports (6 docs), propositions (9 docs), motions (21 docs), interpellations (10 docs)</li>
 <li><strong>Government communications</strong>: 1 press release (Libanon aid increase)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-download-timestamps">Download Timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-download-timestamps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-download-timestamps">Download Timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-download-timestamps"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Script pipeline: 2026-04-20 17:29 UTC</li>
 <li>AI analysis: 2026-04-20 17:31 UTC</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -2766,7 +2783,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:05.097Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:26.485Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html b/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html
index c9551ae52c..bd0c45e1a2 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden&#039;s">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.228Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.616Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.228Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.616Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-20T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's","description":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's pre-election parliamentary accountability campaign. The Riksdag's Environment and Agriculture Committee (MJU) published a committee report…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:05.228Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's","description":"Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's pre-election parliamentary accountability campaign. The Riksdag's Environment and Agriculture Committee (MJU) published a committee report…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:26.616Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,16 +196,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Produced by</strong>: news-evening-analysis</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h3>
 <p>Monday April 20 marks a significant escalation in Sweden's pre-election parliamentary accountability campaign. The Riksdag's Environment and Agriculture Committee (MJU) published a committee report (HD01MJU21) on the National Audit Office's finding that <strong>Sweden's state efforts for agricultural climate transition are insufficient</strong> — a legally binding finding from an independent constitutional body that joins the government's controversial fuel tax cut (HD03236) to create a two-source, independently verified climate credibility challenge going into the September 13, 2026 election.</p>
 <p>The Social Democrats continued their coordinated accountability saturation tactic with <strong>8 written questions in a single day</strong>, targeting infrastructure (Minister Andreas Carlson, KD, for the 6th+ time), justice (Minister Gunnar Strömmer, M), energy (alum shale), and constitutional education. Additionally, S's Mattias Vepsä filed an interpellation (HD10439) challenging Strömmer on the Stockholm police shortage — attacking the government's proudest achievement (BRÅ confirmed the 10,000-officer target) by questioning its geographic and qualitative distribution.</p>
 <p>The Constitutional Committee (KU) scheduled debates on budget appropriation structure (KU42) and a new Riksdag medal law (KU43), while S's Eva Lindh asked what the Education Ministry is doing to improve constitutional knowledge among citizens — a strategically timed question following last week's passage of two vilande constitutional amendments.</p>
 <p><strong>Three ministers face concentrated pressure</strong>: Strömmer (police), Carlson (infrastructure × 2 new questions), and newly Education Minister Mohammso (constitutional knowledge). The government has a defensible position on police numbers but is exposed on quality/distribution. It has no immediate answer to the Riksrevisionen's agricultural climate finding.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🌾 <strong>Riksrevisionen finds Sweden's agricultural climate transition insufficient</strong> (HD01MJU21) — independent finding joins fuel tax cut as two-front climate challenge</li>
 <li>👮 <strong>S targets Stockholm police shortage</strong> (HD10439: Vepsä → Strömmer) — BRÅ confirmed numbers but distribution gaps remain in capital</li>
@@ -217,14 +217,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-
 <li>🗳️ <strong>146 days to election</strong> — S's filing pace 50%+ above session average; coordinated campaign crystallising</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-supported">3 Decisions Supported<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-supported"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-supported">3 Decisions Supported<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-supported"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Government response strategy</strong>: Justice Minister Strömmer should proactively link HD03237 (paid police training) to HD10439's Stockholm concerns in his response — turning S's question into a government implementation story</li>
 <li><strong>Agricultural climate action</strong>: Climate/Agriculture Ministry should announce an agricultural SOU or consultation process within 30 days to transform MJU21 from a liability into a demonstrated response</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional communication</strong>: Education Ministry HD11726 answer should be substantive — reference vilande amendment education campaign, Riksdag public outreach programme, and school civics curriculum update</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus">Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus">Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-risks-next-day-focus">Top 5 Risks (Next-Day Focus)<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Stockholm media picks up police gap story before Strömmer responds</td><td align="center">1.8</td><td align="center">April 21–22</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Riksrevisionen MJU21 triggers Klimatpolitiska rådet comment</td><td align="center">2.2</td><td align="center">May–June</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>S week-3 interpellation surge (late April) — 3–5 new IPs</td><td align="center">1.86</td><td align="center">April 28–May 5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Constitutional knowledge answer (HD11726) amplified by media post-vilande</td><td align="center">1.2</td><td align="center">April 28–May 7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Coalition climate fracture on alum shale (HD11725)</td><td align="center">0.9</td><td align="center">May–July</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-today">Named Actors Today<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-today"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-today">Named Actors Today<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-today"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors-today">Named Actors Today<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Party/Role</th><th>Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong></td><td>Justice Minister (M)</td><td>Target of HD10439 Stockholm police interpellation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mattias Vepsä</strong></td><td>S MP</td><td>Filed HD10439 interpellation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Eva Lindh</strong></td><td>S MP</td><td>Filed HD11726 constitutional knowledge question</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson</strong></td><td>Infrastructure Minister (KD)</td><td>Target of HD11722 + HD11724 (6th+ accountability filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carina Ödebrink</strong></td><td>S MP</td><td>Filed HD11722 + HD11724 (double infrastructure question)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Britz</strong></td><td>Climate Minister (L)</td><td>Target of HD11720 cable recycling question</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Simona Mohammso</strong></td><td>Education Minister (M)</td><td>Target of HD11726 constitutional knowledge</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Peter Kullgren</strong></td><td>Rural Minister (KD)</td><td>Target of HD11721 Leader rural development</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21">Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21">Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KU deliberations</strong>: KU42 and KU43 move toward plenary scheduling</li>
 <li><strong>MJU21 media response</strong>: Watch DN/SvD morning editions for Riksrevisionen agricultural climate coverage</li>
@@ -330,17 +330,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-april-21">Next-Day Watch Points (April 21)<a cl
 <li><strong>EU Summit context</strong>: EU-SUMMIT-20260422 (from realtime memory) — Swedish government positioning on climate/security</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <img src="https://hack23.com/icon-192.png" alt="Hack23 Logo" width="96" height="96">
 </p>
-<h2 align="center" id="rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h2 align="center" id="rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
 <p align="center">
   <strong>Constitutional Budget Scrutiny · Agricultural Climate Failure · Opposition Accountability Offensive</strong><br>
   <em>Monday 2026-04-20 | Riksmöte 2025/26 | Deep Analysis</em>
 </p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--synthesis-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-metadata"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Synthesis ID</strong></td><td><code>SYN-2026-04-20-EVE001</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 17:31 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>14 (3 committee reports + 1 interpellation + 8 written questions + 2 cross-refs)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 (plus integrated sibling analysis: CR, PROP, MOT, IP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-evening-analysis agentic workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH 🟩</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Days to Election</strong></td><td>~146 days (September 13, 2026)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph "📊 Evening Analysis Intelligence Dashboard — 2026-04-20"
         direction TB
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-
     style POL fill:#C62828,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#E65100,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th align="center">Electoral Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>Budget structure under constitutional scrutiny</strong> — KU42 debates the appropriation-area framework; constitutional committee's scrutiny role underscores the pre-election accountability atmosphere</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">🟠HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">Fiscal credibility narrative</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>Agricultural climate transition failures</strong> — Riksrevisionen MJU21 finds state efforts insufficient; Sweden risks missing 2030 agricultural emissions targets despite government rhetoric on "green transition"</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td align="center">🟠HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">Opposition climate narrative</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>Stockholm police shortage framing</strong> — Vepsä (S) interpellation challenges Strömmer on whether BRÅ-documented police goal masks quality/distribution problems; Stockholm specifically underpoliced</td><td>HD10439</td><td align="center">🟠HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">S security credibility challenge</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>4</strong></td><td><strong>S accountability saturation tactic</strong> — 8 written questions in single day targeting infrastructure, energy, education, justice; pattern across full legislative week shows S filing at 60%+ above session average</td><td>HD11722–HD11727</td><td align="center">🟡MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td><td align="center">Parliamentary record pre-election</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td><strong>Riksdag medal law modernisation</strong> — KU43 creates modern framework for the Riksdag's ceremonial medal; non-controversial; scheduled for debate</td><td>HD01KU43</td><td align="center">🟢LOW</td><td align="center">🟦VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">Symbolic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-significance-ranking">📈 Document Significance Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-significance-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-significance-ranking">📈 Document Significance Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-significance-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -542,44 +542,44 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-significance-ranking">📈 Document Significance Ranking<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok ID</th><th align="center">Committee</th><th>Title</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Key Driver</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td align="center">MJU</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td align="center"><strong>18/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 TIER-2</td><td>Riksrevisionen finding; climate election battleground</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10439</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm (IP)</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟠 TIER-2</td><td>Links to HD03237; S-M security debate</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">KU</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td align="center"><strong>15/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 TIER-2</td><td>Budget framework; constitutional scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD11725</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Kommunalt veto mot alunskifferbrytning</td><td align="center"><strong>10/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 TIER-3</td><td>Energy/environment tension; C+S alignment</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD11726</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Kunskap om grundlagarna</td><td align="center"><strong>9/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟡 TIER-3</td><td>Constitutional week; election-year civics framing</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>HD11722</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Trafikverkets anslag till ideella org</td><td align="center"><strong>8/25</strong></td><td align="center">🟢 TIER-3</td><td>Carlson infrastructure accountability</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7–14</td><td>HD11720–27</td><td align="center">—</td><td>Written questions (8 items)</td><td align="center">5–8/25</td><td align="center">🟢 TIER-3</td><td>Routine but collectively significant</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-document-patterns">🔍 Cross-Document Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-document-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week">Theme 1: S Accountability Offensive — Constitutional Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-document-patterns">🔍 Cross-Document Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-document-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week">Theme 1: S Accountability Offensive — Constitutional Week<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-s-accountability-offensive--constitutional-week"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: 🟩HIGH</strong> — Reading the day's document flow alongside the week's earlier motions and interpellations, a unified picture emerges: the Social Democrats are running a disciplined, coordinated parliamentary accountability campaign. The August calendar shows S's full-session filing rate has accelerated by ~50% since April 14 (interpellation analysis). Monday April 20's 8 written questions span: infrastructure (Minister Carlson, who faces 6th+ interpellation), energy (alum shale, Minister Busch/Britz), justice (Minister Strömmer, also facing new interpellation HD10439), and constitutional education (Minister Mohammso). No portfolio is left unchallenged.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral logic</strong>: S is exploiting a "records matter" strategy — each written question creates a timestamped parliamentary exchange before the summer recess. Any non-committal or weak ministerial response becomes usable September-campaign material. The constitutional knowledge question (HD11726) is especially strategically timed: one week after two constitutional amendments (KU33/KU32) passed "vilande", demanding constitutional competence answers from the Education Minister while the government champions constitutional reform is a neat rhetorical trap.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens">Theme 2: Climate Credibility Gap Widens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens">Theme 2: Climate Credibility Gap Widens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-climate-credibility-gap-widens"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: 🟩HIGH</strong> — MJU21 (Riksrevisionen on agricultural climate) and HD11725 (alum shale municipal veto) together reinforce the opposition's central Spring 2026 climate narrative established in the motions analysis: the government is simultaneously cutting fuel taxes (HD03236, adding +0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e) and now found to have insufficient agricultural climate transition plans. Agriculture represents ~14% of Sweden's domestic GHG emissions; the Riksrevisionen finding adds a third front of climate accountability to fuel taxes and energy policy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension">Theme 3: Police Quality vs. Quantity Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension">Theme 3: Police Quality vs. Quantity Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-police-quality-vs-quantity-tension"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: 🟧MEDIUM</strong> — HD10439 targets Justice Minister Strömmer on the BRÅ evaluation of the 10,000 police officer goal. The BRÅ evaluation confirms the numerical target was reached — but S's framing targets Stockholm-specific distribution failures and quality/deployment issues. This is a sophisticated challenge: the government can defend the headline number while S attacks its operational implementation. The argument is rendered more complex because HD03237 (paid police training) — part of today's sibling proposition package — is precisely the government's answer to recruitment constraints. S is attacking a problem the government claims to have already solved.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--aggregated-swot">📊 Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--aggregated-swot"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment">Strengths (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregated-swot">📊 Aggregated SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregated-swot"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment">Strengths (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Police 10,000 target met (BRÅ confirmed) — defensible headline number</li>
 <li>KU42 debate shows constitutional transparency commitment</li>
 <li>KU43 modernisation demonstrates legislative housekeeping competence</li>
 <li>Energy reform pipeline (HD03240/39/38) provides forward counter-narrative to climate attacks</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment">Weaknesses (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment">Weaknesses (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>MJU21/Riksrevisionen finding on agricultural climate is legally on the record — difficult to dismiss</li>
 <li>Stockholm police distribution gap (HD10439) cannot be erased by numerical targets</li>
 <li>Minister Carlson (infrastructure) remains most-targeted minister — KD portfolio vulnerability</li>
 <li>8 ministerial portfolios challenged in a single day; bandwidth pressure on government responses</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment">Opportunities (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment">Opportunities (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>KU42 budget structure debate allows government to showcase fiscal responsibility narrative</li>
 <li>Linking HD03237 (paid police training) proactively to HD10439 concerns would turn S's question into a government success story</li>
 <li>Agricultural climate: announce SOU or action plan within 30 days to neutralise Riksrevisionen finding</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-coalitiongovernment">Threats (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-coalitiongovernment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-coalitiongovernment">Threats (Coalition/Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-coalitiongovernment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S's "constitutional knowledge" question (HD11726) creates a rhetorical trap right as vilande amendments are debated</li>
 <li>Alum shale veto (HD11725) exposes energy-environment incoherence — C+S aligned against SD</li>
 <li>S's accelerating filing pace suggests a week-3 interpellation surge likely late April</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape">⚠️ Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape">⚠️ Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-landscape">⚠️ Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Likelihood</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen agricultural climate finding triggers Klimatpolitiska rådet escalation</td><td align="center">🟠 M (0.55)</td><td align="center">🔴 H (4)</td><td align="center"><strong>2.2</strong></td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S Stockholm police narrative gains media traction before Strömmer responds</td><td align="center">🟠 M (0.60)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>1.8</strong></td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S's constitutional knowledge question (HD11726) undermines education minister</td><td align="center">🟡 L (0.40)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>1.2</strong></td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU42 budget debate exposes appropriation-area structure weaknesses</td><td align="center">🟡 L (0.35)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>1.05</strong></td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Alum shale veto debate fractures coalition energy consensus</td><td align="center">🟡 L (0.30)</td><td align="center">🟠 M (3)</td><td align="center"><strong>0.9</strong></td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔭 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">🔭 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔭 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Justice Minister Strömmer responds to HD10439</td><td>Written question deadline (~10 days)</td><td>~April 30</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>MJU21 scheduled for plenary debate</td><td>KU committee timetable</td><td>April 28–May 5</td><td align="center">🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>S files follow-up alum shale interpellation</td><td>HD11725 response quality</td><td>May 1–10</td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional knowledge minister response triggers media analysis</td><td>HD11726 response + vilande debate context</td><td>April 28–May 7</td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet comments on MJU21 findings</td><td>Publication of council review</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td align="center">🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-artifacts-inventory">🗂️ Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-artifacts-inventory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-artifacts-inventory">🗂️ Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-artifacts-inventory"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -771,11 +771,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-artifacts-inventory">🗂️ Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Artifact</th><th>File</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Synthesis Summary</td><td>synthesis-summary.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Risk Assessment</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Threat Analysis</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Classification Results</td><td>classification-results.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Significance Scoring</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Stakeholder Perspectives</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Cross-Reference Map</td><td>cross-reference-map.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Data Download Manifest</td><td>data-download-manifest.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>README</td><td>README.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Executive Brief</td><td>executive-brief.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>Comparative International</td><td>comparative-international.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>Methodology Reflection</td><td>methodology-reflection.md</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SIG ID</strong>: <code>SIG-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:37 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points">Significance Scoring Framework (5 Dimensions × 5 Points)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points">Significance Scoring Framework (5 Dimensions × 5 Points)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -813,8 +813,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring-framework-5-dimensions--5-points">Significance S
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">25%</td><td>Impact on 2026 election dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">20%</td><td>Likelihood/magnitude of policy change</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">20%</td><td>Number/significance of affected groups</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">20%</td><td>Constitutional/legal/institutional significance</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">15%</td><td>Expected media attention and public resonance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-scoring">Per-Document Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-scoring"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-scoring">Per-Document Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-scoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Climate is top-3 election issue; independent audit finding amplifies credibility</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksrevisionen findings legally require government response within 6 months</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Affects all of Sweden (14% domestic GHG), farmers (~70,000), rural communities</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksrevisionen is constitutional body; finding is on official record</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Riksrevisionen reports routinely get front-page coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>21/25</strong></td><td><strong>High significance — publication priority</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>PUBLISH</strong></td><td>Lead story for climate/environment angle</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation">HD10439 — Brist på poliser i Stockholm (interpellation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation">HD10439 — Brist på poliser i Stockholm (interpellation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10439--brist-på-poliser-i-stockholm-interpellation">HD10439 — Br
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Security is #1 election issue per polling; Stockholm focus maximises salience</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Written interpellation; forces Strömmer response on record</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Stockholm = 1/4 of Swedish population; police is universal concern</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Interpellation = formal parliamentary accountability mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Police/crime stories dominate Swedish media</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>19/25</strong></td><td><strong>High significance</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>PUBLISH</strong></td><td>Frames police expansion vs quality debate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report">HD01KU42 — Indelning i utgiftsområden (committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report">HD01KU42 — Indelning i utgiftsområden (committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01ku42--indelning-i-utgiftsområden-committee-report">HD01KU42 —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Budget structure is technical; matters for fiscal credibility narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Debate stage — not yet voted</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Affects all taxpayers through fiscal framework</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Constitutional committee debating fundamental budget architecture</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Technical nature limits media interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>15/25</strong></td><td><strong>Medium significance</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>INCLUDE</strong></td><td>Context for fiscal accountability narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question">HD11726 — Kunskap om grundlagarna (question)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question">HD11726 — Kunskap om grundlagarna (question)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd11726--kunskap-om-grundlagarna-question">HD11726 — Kunskap om gru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Post-vilande amendments; constitutional awareness = election-year issue</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Written question; no immediate policy change</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">4</td><td>All citizens affected by constitutional amendments</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Post-KU33/KU32 vilande context amplifies</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Constitutional education not naturally viral; but timing matters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>16/25</strong></td><td><strong>Medium-High significance</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>INCLUDE</strong></td><td>Important constitutional accountability signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727">Collective Written Questions (HD11720–11727)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727">Collective Written Questions (HD11720–11727)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-collective-written-questions-hd1172011727">Collective Written Questio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Collectively demonstrate S's pre-election accountability saturation</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Change</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Individual questions rarely produce immediate policy change</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Reach</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Cover multiple sectors (infrastructure, environment, justice)</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional Weight</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Routine parliamentary mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Media Salience</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Individually minor; collectively signals S's pace</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>13/25 (collective)</strong></td><td><strong>Medium significance as pattern</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>CONTEXT</strong></td><td>Analyse as accountability campaign pattern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary">Overall Evening Analysis Significance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary">Overall Evening Analysis Significance Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Composite Score (weighted)</strong>: 74/100
 <strong>Publication Tier</strong>: TIER-2 (High importance, immediate publication)
 <strong>Recommended Lead Story</strong>: Agricultural climate failure (MJU21) — Riksrevisionen finding strongest anchor
@@ -1062,11 +1062,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-evening-analysis-significance-summary">Overall Evening Analys
 <strong>Context Story</strong>: S accountability saturation campaign — 8 questions in one day
 <strong>Election 2026 Relevance</strong>: HIGH 🟩 — climate, security, constitutional accountability all live election issues</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>STA ID</strong>: <code>STA-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:38 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     CENTER[🇸🇪 Evening Analysis&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>Stakeholder Impact] --> CIT[👥 Citizens&#x3C;br/>HIGH]
     CENTER --> GOV[🏛️ Government Coalition&#x3C;br/>MIXED — under pressure]
@@ -1086,8 +1086,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     style JUD fill:#1B5E20,color:#fff
     style MED fill:#E91E63,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups">Stakeholder Analysis — All 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups">Stakeholder Analysis — All 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-analysis--all-8-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Election 2026 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Monday's parliamentary activity touches three of the top voter concerns: security (police), environment (agricultural climate), and infrastructure (Carlson's portfolio). The HD10439 Stockholm police interpellation directly affects the 970,000 Stockholm municipality residents who experience the policing gap daily. The MJU21 agricultural climate finding affects both urban consumers (food prices, sustainability expectations) and rural citizens (farming communities). HD11726's constitutional knowledge question affects all 7.7 million eligible voters ahead of the first "constitutional election" in modern Swedish history.</p>
 <p><strong>Specific citizen groups affected</strong>:</p>
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" h
 <li>Trafikverket NGO beneficiaries: HD11722 (civil society cuts)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">2. Government Coalition (M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">2. Government Coalition (M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH (adverse) | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Actor-specific analysis</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">2. Government Coalitio
 <li><strong>Energy Minister Johan Britz/Romina Pourmokhtari (L)</strong>: HD11720 + HD11725 on climate/environment</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c">3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c">3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH (positive) | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Actor-specific analysis</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s--v--mp--c">3. Opposition Bloc (S + V + MP + C)<a
 <li><strong>C (Rickard Nordin, Mikael Larsson)</strong>: Two questions (HD11720, HD11721) on environment and rural policy — positions C as pragmatic environmental actor</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: MEDIUM | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Medium-term | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Farming sector</strong> (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund, LRF): MJU21 agricultural climate transition — mixed. Riksrevisionen finding documents state insufficiency, which LRF will use to argue for better government support rather than regulatory pressure</li>
@@ -1133,7 +1133,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>NGOs/civil society organisations</strong>: HD11722 — Trafikverket cuts to ideella organisationer; S's Ödebrink questioning signals political support for civil society funding</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Medium | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Environmental NGOs</strong> (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF): MJU21 agricultural climate finding = major advocacy victory; validates campaigns against agricultural emissions</li>
@@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 <li><strong>Constitutional civil society</strong> (Transparency International, Myndigheten för press, tv och radio): HD11726 + vilande amendments — constitutional knowledge gap is exactly their mandate</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: LOW-MEDIUM | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Medium | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EU Commission</strong>: MJU21 agricultural climate — Sweden's Riksrevisionen finding will be noted in EU's review of member-state CAP compliance and climate transition progress</li>
@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>EU pay transparency</strong>: From sibling analysis IP437 — Sweden's failure to implement EU directive creates EU infringement risk</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Riksrevisionen</strong>: MJU21 is its own finding — the constitutional body will monitor government response; if no action within 6 months, can escalate</li>
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet</strong>: Independent council mandated by Klimatlagen; MJU21 + HD03236 fuel tax cut combination is exactly the type of policy inconsistency the council monitors</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Expected media framing</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1176,11 +1176,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden
 <li>Constitutional awareness: Only 34% of Swedes can name all five fundamental laws (Demoskop 2024) — HD11726 identifies a real gap</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Horizon</strong>: Tomorrow / 7-day / 30-day</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-three-base-scenarios">Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability">Scenario A: Government Containment (35% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-three-base-scenarios">Three Base Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-base-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability">Scenario A: Government Containment (35% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Label</strong>: "Strömmer Responds, Svantesson Pivots"
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Justice Minister Strömmer issues a strong HD10439 response citing HD03237 (paid training) as the structural answer to Stockholm police distribution gaps. The Climate/Agriculture Ministry announces an agricultural emissions action plan within 14 days of the MJU21 debate. The Education Ministry's HD11726 response references a new constitutional literacy campaign timed to coincide with the election. The government successfully frames the week as "accountable governance responding to legitimate questions."</p>
@@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a-government-containment-35-probability">Scenario A: Governm
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: This scenario requires coordinated ministerial communications — possible given the government's Spring Fiscal package discipline, but the agricultural response timeline is tight.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability">Scenario B: S Accountability Gains Traction (50% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability">Scenario B: S Accountability Gains Traction (50% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Label</strong>: "The Double Climate Indictment"
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: MJU21 becomes the lead story in DN/SvD on April 21, framed as "Riksrevisionen: Sverige klarar inte jordbrukets klimatomställning." This is combined with reporting that the government simultaneously cut fuel taxes (HD03236), adding emissions. S's Magdalena Andersson holds a press conference citing both Riksrevisionen findings and the motions already filed (HD024082, HD024098). The police interpellation (HD10439) generates secondary coverage on Stockholm-specific policing gaps. The government's response window is 10 days but the media narrative is already set.</p>
@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-accountability-gains-traction-50-probability">Scenario B
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: This is the base case. S's filing discipline and the independent Riksrevisionen anchor make it structurally likely.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability">Scenario C: Constitutional Accountability Week (15% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability">Scenario C: Constitutional Accountability Week (15% probability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Label</strong>: "Four Documents, One Theme: Who Controls the State?"
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟥LOW-MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The KU42 budget structure debate, the KU33/KU32 vilande amendments, the HD11726 constitutional knowledge question, and the announced KU summons of Finance Minister Svantesson (from realtime memory) combine into a unified "constitutional accountability week" narrative. Media frames the week as "who controls Sweden's constitutional architecture?" HD11726 becomes a viral talking point about the government changing the constitution without citizen education.</p>
@@ -1217,8 +1217,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-c-constitutional-accountability-week-15-probability">Scenari
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: Requires media and opposition coordination to land the combined narrative. Possible but not structurally pre-determined.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-two-wildcards">Two Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-wildcards"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response">Wildcard 1: Klimatpolitiska rådet Rapid Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-two-wildcards">Two Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-two-wildcards"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response">Wildcard 1: Klimatpolitiska rådet Rapid Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 0.25 | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: 🔴CRITICAL</p>
 <p>The independent climate policy council issues an urgent statement on the MJU21 + fuel tax cut combination within 7 days. This would:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1227,11 +1227,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-wildcard-1-klimatpolitiska-rådet-rapid-response">Wildcard 1: Klimatp
 <li>Elevate the story from parliamentary-level to constitutional-level accountability</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents">Wildcard 2: KU Summons Reveal Sensitive Budget Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents">Wildcard 2: KU Summons Reveal Sensitive Budget Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-ku-summons-reveal-sensitive-budget-documents"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 0.20 | <strong>Impact if realised</strong>: 🟠HIGH</p>
 <p>The KU summons of Finance Minister Svantesson (flagged in realtime memory for this week) produces unexpected revelations about budgetary decision-making processes. If Svantesson's testimony on the Spring Economic Bill (HD03100) or the extra amendment budget (HD03236) reveals internal disagreements or rushed decision-making, the climate-fiscal accountability narrative widens.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses">ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses">ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-grid--key-hypotheses">ACH Grid — Key Hypotheses<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th align="center">Scenario A</th><th align="center">Scenario B</th><th align="center">Scenario C</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1: Media leads with MJU21 tomorrow</td><td align="center">Contradicts</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>H2: S holds climate press conference by April 23</td><td align="center">Contradicts</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>H3: Government announces agricultural action plan by May 1</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Contradicts</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>H4: KU summons produces significant Svantesson testimony</td><td align="center">Neutral</td><td align="center">Neutral</td><td align="center">Supports</td></tr><tr><td>H5: Strömmer cites HD03237 in HD10439 response</td><td align="center">Supports</td><td align="center">Neutral</td><td align="center">Neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-30-day-forward-indicators">30-Day Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-30-day-forward-indicators">30-Day Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-30-day-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1318,12 +1318,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-30-day-forward-indicators">30-Day Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Expected Date</th><th align="center">Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MJU21 plenary debate</td><td align="center">April 28–May 5</td><td align="center">S/MP/C amplification opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439 Strömmer response</td><td align="center">~April 30</td><td align="center">Government defence of police record</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural climate action plan</td><td align="center">May 1–20</td><td align="center">Government damage control</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet comment</td><td align="center">May–June</td><td align="center">Independent escalation</td></tr><tr><td>S week-3 interpellation surge</td><td align="center">April 28–May 5</td><td align="center">New target portfolios likely</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission climate review</td><td align="center">May–June</td><td align="center">Sweden's CAP compliance assessment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>RSK ID</strong>: <code>RSK-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:34 UTC
 <strong>Risk Framework</strong>: Likelihood × Impact (L×I scoring, 0.1–5.0)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Evening Analysis 2026-04-20
     x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
@@ -1341,8 +1341,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     Carlson portfolio deterioration: [0.70, 0.55]
     S interpellation surge week 3: [0.72, 0.62]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation">Risk 1: Riksrevisionen Agricultural Climate Finding Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation">Risk 1: Riksrevisionen Agricultural Climate Finding Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-001
 <strong>Category</strong>: Policy/Regulatory
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD01MJU21 (MJU21 committee report)</p>
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-1-riksrevisionen-agricultural-climate-finding-escalation">Risk 1
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Riksrevisionen's MJU21 report documents that Sweden's state efforts for agricultural climate transition are insufficient. Agriculture represents ~14% of Sweden's domestic GHG emissions. If Klimatpolitiska rådet (the independent climate policy council) issues a follow-up comment — which it does routinely for Riksrevisionen findings — the damage to government's climate credibility will be officially compounded. Combined with the fuel tax cut (HD03236, adding +0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e), Sweden faces a two-front climate accountability challenge.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Announce an agricultural climate action plan (SOU or government consultation) within 30 days. This would transform the Riksrevisionen finding from a liability into a demonstrated government responsiveness.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction">Risk 2: S Stockholm Police Narrative Gains Media Traction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction">Risk 2: S Stockholm Police Narrative Gains Media Traction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-002
 <strong>Category</strong>: Political/Reputational
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD10439 (interpellation by Mattias Vepsä, S → Gunnar Strömmer, M)</p>
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-2-s-stockholm-police-narrative-gains-media-traction">Risk 2: S S
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: S's Mattias Vepsä targets Justice Minister Strömmer on the BRÅ evaluation of the 10,000-police-officer goal. The BRÅ confirmed the numerical target was met — but Vepsä's framing focuses on Stockholm-specific distribution and quality concerns. The government's most defensible position (met the headline number) is also its most vulnerable: it invites the question "why are Stockholm residents still experiencing police shortages?" The new paid-training proposition (HD03237) is the government's structural answer — but HD03237 won't produce trained officers until 2028 at earliest.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Strömmer should cite HD03237 proactively in HD10439 response, present Stockholm deployment data, and announce regional allocation review.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april">Risk 3: S Interpellation Surge Week 3 (Late April)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april">Risk 3: S Interpellation Surge Week 3 (Late April)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-003
 <strong>Category</strong>: Political/Parliamentary
 <strong>Source</strong>: Pattern analysis — motions (21 in 6 days), interpellations (7 in 6 days), questions (8 today)</p>
@@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-3-s-interpellation-surge-week-3-late-april">Risk 3: S Interpella
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: S is filing at ~50% above its session average pace. The documented pattern in the interpellation analysis (April 14–17: 7 new S interpellations) plus today's 8 written questions suggests the party is in a high-output pre-election documentation phase. With the Riksdag approaching its final sessions before summer recess, each question/interpellation locks in ministerial response records. A week-3 surge (late April) could include 3–5 new interpellations targeting Carlson, Strömmer, Larsson, and potentially Prime Minister Kristersson directly.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Government communications team should triage incoming questions, prepare comprehensive responses for the most politically salient topics, and consider proactive press conference preemption on key portfolios.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale">Risk 4: Coalition Energy/Environment Fracture on Alum Shale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale">Risk 4: Coalition Energy/Environment Fracture on Alum Shale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-004
 <strong>Category</strong>: Coalition Stability
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD11725 (question on municipal veto on alum shale mining)</p>
@@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-4-coalition-energyenvironment-fracture-on-alum-shale">Risk 4: Co
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Attribute</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Likelihood</strong></td><td>0.30 (LOW-MEDIUM)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Impact</strong></td><td>3 (MEDIUM — exposes Tidö coalition environmental limits)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L×I Score</strong></td><td><strong>0.9</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Velocity</strong></td><td>Slow (depends on government response to HD11725 and broader mining policy debate)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Centerpartiet (C) and S are aligned on municipal veto rights for alum shale extraction. SD is presumed to support mineral extraction for economic reasons. This creates a potential C-vs-SD tension within the Tidö coalition framework. While alum shale is not a first-tier election issue, it is a microcosm of the broader environmental tension that could widen.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726">Risk 5: Constitutional Knowledge Trap (HD11726)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726">Risk 5: Constitutional Knowledge Trap (HD11726)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk ID</strong>: RSK-EA-005
 <strong>Category</strong>: Reputational/Institutional
 <strong>Source</strong>: HD11726 (question on Kunskap om grundlagarna by Eva Lindh, S → Education Minister Mohammso)</p>
@@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-risk-5-constitutional-knowledge-trap-hd11726">Risk 5: Constitutional
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Attribute</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Likelihood</strong></td><td>0.40 (LOW-MEDIUM)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Impact</strong></td><td>3 (MEDIUM — damages constitutional reform credibility)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L×I Score</strong></td><td><strong>1.2</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Velocity</strong></td><td>Medium (answer expected within 14 days)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: S's Eva Lindh asks what the government is doing to improve citizen knowledge of the Swedish constitution — timed precisely one week after the Riksdag adopted two vilande constitutional amendments (KU33 on police seizure secrecy and KU32 on media accessibility). If the Education Ministry's answer is weak or non-committal, it will be used to argue the government is changing the constitution without adequately informing citizens — a powerful democratic accountability argument.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment">Coalition Stability Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment">Coalition Stability Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     M[Moderaterna&#x3C;br/>PM Kristersson] -->|Confidence &#x26; Supply| SD[Sverigedemokraterna]
     M --> KD[Kristdemokraterna]
@@ -1542,12 +1542,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-assessment">Coalition Stability Risk Assessm
 <strong>Key Vulnerability</strong>: KD (Andreas Carlson infrastructure portfolio) and L (Nina Larsson gender equality portfolio)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SWOT ID</strong>: <code>SWT-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:33 UTC
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Full-day synthesis — committee reports, interpellations, written questions</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Evening Analysis&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>SWOT))
     Strengths
@@ -1609,64 +1609,64 @@ <h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
         SD pro-extraction vs C+S vs MP
         Could expose Tidö coalition environmental limits</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">Coalition SWOT (Tidö: M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd">Coalition SWOT (Tidö: M-KD-L, supported by SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-swot-tidö-m-kd-l-supported-by-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Police delivery</strong>: BRÅ confirmed 10,000 officers target met — rare example of government delivering on a precise numerical commitment. Strömmer can invoke this against HD10439 <code>[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Energy reform package</strong>: The sibling proposition analysis confirms HD03239/240/238 deliver a coherent industrial policy — positive contrast to the climate-only narrative opposition prefers <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>NATO credibility</strong>: HD03220 (EFP Finland) and Ukraine accountability measures (HD03231/32) place Sweden firmly in the mainstream European security architecture <code>[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal package</strong>: Three budget propositions (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236) provide election-year economic narrative <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Agricultural climate</strong>: MJU21/Riksrevisionen creates an official record that cannot be redacted. Agriculture = 14% of domestic GHG; documented insufficiency joins fuel tax cut as climate credibility damage <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Stockholm policing</strong>: Quantitative goal vs qualitative/geographic distribution gap — S's framing exposes the limitation of headline-number politics <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>KD infrastructure</strong>: Carlson's portfolio is consistently identified as weakest in coalition; KD cannot afford to lose further seats to M or S <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Alum shale position</strong>: SD's presumed support for mineral extraction puts it at odds with C (coalition-adjacent) and S on HD11725 — a microcosm of wider environmental coalition tension <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Agricultural action plan</strong>: A rapid announcement of an SOU or consultation process would transform MJU21 from a liability to a response. Window is April 20–May 10 before Riksdag recess discussions begin <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional leadership</strong>: KU42 debate on budget structure — if the government champions transparent fiscal architecture, it takes the lead narrative away from opposition <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Police quality follow-up</strong>: Address Stockholm distribution concern proactively in Strömmer's HD10439 response — cite HD03237 as the structural solution <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet escalation</strong>: The council is independent; MJU21 finding likely triggers a council review comment in May–June 2026, amplifying the damage <code>[MEDIUM-HIGH confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>HD11726 constitutional trap</strong>: The Education Ministry will have to answer "what is being done to increase constitutional knowledge among citizens?" — any weak answer will be weaponised as the vilande amendments make the constitution a live election issue <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>S filing momentum</strong>: The week-over-week escalation in S's parliamentary activity (motions, interpellations, written questions) is structurally concerning — Riksdag summer recess approaches, each filed question locks in a ministerial record <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c">Opposition SWOT (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c">Opposition SWOT (S + V + MP + C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-swot-s--v--mp--c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Documented government failures</strong>: MJU21 provides an independent audit authority's finding — more durable than political accusations <code>[VERY HIGH confidence 🟦]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Coordinated accountability campaign</strong>: S's simultaneous coverage of infrastructure, justice, energy, education, and climate demonstrates portfolio breadth that suggests S is ready to govern <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Climate narrative coherence</strong>: Fuel tax cut (HD03236) + agricultural climate failure (MJU21) + MJU25 (forthcoming) = a layered, multi-front climate case <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S silent on deportation</strong> (from motions analysis): S's revealed strategic choice to avoid the security-enforcement immigration narrative limits coalition-building credibility on the right <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>V+MP electoral risk</strong>: Their arms-export and immigration positions poll poorly with median voter <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>S must own economic failure too</strong>: Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth and 8.69% unemployment happened under conditions S did not fully prevent when in government 2014–2022 <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>MJU21 amplification</strong>: Bring Riksrevisionen finding to media at first plenary debate opportunity <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 <li><strong>HD11726 timing</strong>: Constitutional knowledge debate immediately post-vilande amendments is symbolically perfect for S <code>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government pays its debts</strong>: If Strömmer, Carlson, and other ministers respond substantively to the written question wave, the accountability saturation tactic loses impact <code>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Election fatigue</strong>: Voters may tune out escalating accountability campaigns if not tied to vivid personal stories <code>[LOW confidence 🟥]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>THR ID</strong>: <code>THR-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:35 UTC
 <strong>Framework</strong>: STRIDE + Political Threat Taxonomy</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[⚠️ Evening Analysis&#x3C;br/>Threat Taxonomy&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20] --> T1
     ROOT --> T2
@@ -1689,8 +1689,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidd
     style T5 fill:#4A148C,color:#fff
     style T6 fill:#0D47A1,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-category-analysis">Threat Category Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-1-constitutional-threats">Category 1: Constitutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-constitutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-category-analysis">Threat Category Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-1-constitutional-threats">Category 1: Constitutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-constitutional-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 3/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-1-constitutional-threats">Category 1: Constitutional Threats
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget appropriation scrutiny exposes fiscal structural weaknesses</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">April–May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional knowledge deficit legitimises opposition campaign</td><td>HD11726</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">April–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Vilande amendments pass without citizen awareness</td><td>KU33+KU32 context</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">Pre-election 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The constitutional threat cluster centres on the government's management of its constitutional reform agenda. The two vilande amendments (KU33 on police seizure secrecy, KU32 on media accessibility) are legitimate democratic instruments — but passing them without a parallel public education campaign creates a democratic legitimacy question that S's Eva Lindh (HD11726) is expertly exploiting. The Education Ministry's response will be scrutinised.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats">Category 2: Climate/Environment Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats">Category 2: Climate/Environment Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 4/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-2-climateenvironment-threats">Category 2: Climate/Environmen
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen agricultural climate finding triggers council review</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cut + agricultural failure = documented double standard</td><td>HD03236 + MJU21</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">April–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal alum shale veto fractures C-SD coalition alignment</td><td>HD11725</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">May–July 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The climate threat is the most strategically significant for the 2026 election. The MJU21 finding is produced by an independent constitutional body (Riksrevisionen) whose findings carry legal weight under the Swedish riksrevision framework. Unlike political accusations, this finding will appear in official parliament records. Combined with the fuel tax cut (a proactive government choice to increase emissions), the opposition has constructed a two-source, independently-verified climate credibility challenge.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats">Category 3: Security/Rule of Law Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats">Category 3: Security/Rule of Law Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 3/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-3-securityrule-of-law-threats">Category 3: Security/Rule of
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Stockholm police deficit becomes headline story</td><td>HD10439</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">April 21 – May 5</td></tr><tr><td>Gang recruitment crisis continues despite police expansion</td><td>Policy context</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>Paid police training delayed implementation risk</td><td>HD03237</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">2027–2028</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The police threat is primarily electoral rather than operational. The operational situation (10,000 officers) is better than 2022 but the qualitative/geographic distribution argument is legitimate. S's Vepsä (HD10439) is sophisticated: targeting Stockholm specifically forces Strömmer to defend not just national numbers but the most politically salient urban constituency.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-4-economic-threats">Category 4: Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-economic-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-4-economic-threats">Category 4: Economic Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-economic-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 4/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-4-economic-threats">Category 4: Economic Threats<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden's 0.82% GDP growth gap vs Nordic peers closes too slowly</td><td>Propositions context</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">2026 election</td></tr><tr><td>Spring Economic Bill credibility window narrows as election approaches</td><td>HD03100</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center">May–September</td></tr><tr><td>Unemployment 8.69% remains above Nordic peers</td><td>World Bank data</td><td align="center">4/5</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">Persistent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The economic threat is the background condition against which all other threats are amplified. With Sweden growing at 0.82% vs Denmark (3.48%) and Norway (2.10%), the government cannot easily claim economic management success. The Spring Amendment Budget (HD03236) fuel tax cut is explicitly designed to close the "feel-good" gap — but if voters perceive it as electoral rather than structural, its impact is diminished.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats">Category 5: Coalition Stability Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats">Category 5: Coalition Stability Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 3/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 
 
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-5-coalition-stability-threats">Category 5: Coalition Stabili
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KD infrastructure portfolio continues to deteriorate</td><td>Carlson 6th+ IP</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">April–May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>L gender equality failures damage liberal-values brand</td><td>IP437+438</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">April–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>SD-C-L tension on environment/culture policies</td><td>HD11725 + broader</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">Spring session</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats">Category 6: Democratic Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats">Category 6: Democratic Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Severity</strong>: 2/5 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 
 
@@ -1910,17 +1910,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-6-democratic-integrity-threats">Category 6: Democratic Integ
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th align="center">Severity</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th align="center">Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional amendments passed without public awareness campaign</td><td>KU33/KU32 vilande</td><td align="center">3/5</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center">Pre-election</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition exploits knowledge gap for delegitimisation</td><td>HD11726</td><td align="center">2/5</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">April–September</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The democratic integrity threat is primarily reputational rather than operational. Sweden's constitutional process (vilande amendments) is legally sound. The risk is that the government fails to communicate adequately what the amendments mean, allowing the opposition to frame them as secretive constitutional changes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-assessment">Overall Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-assessment">Overall Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence level</strong>: Threat near MEDIUM-HIGH (2026-04-20 evening)</p>
 <p>The dominant threat cluster is the <strong>climate accountability compound</strong> (MJU21 + HD03236 + HD11725) — independently verified, multi-front, and aligned with three opposition parties (S, MP, C). The secondary threat is the <strong>parliamentary saturation campaign</strong> — S's escalating filing pace is structurally asymmetric in that the government must respond to every question while S pays no cost for filing.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's Swedish parliamentary activity — Riksrevisionen agricultural climate failure, police quality accountability, and constitutional scrutiny — has direct parallels across Nordic and EU peers.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks">Jurisdiction Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator">1. Denmark 🇩🇰 — Agricultural Climate Transition (Lead Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks">Jurisdiction Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-benchmarks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator">1. Denmark 🇩🇰 — Agricultural Climate Transition (Lead Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD01MJU21 agricultural climate findings</p>
 <p>Denmark is the most direct comparator for Sweden's agricultural climate challenge. In 2021, Denmark adopted the world's first comprehensive <strong>agricultural climate plan</strong>, including:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1931,14 +1931,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-denmark---agricultural-climate-transition-lead-comparator">1. Denma
 <p><strong>Sweden vs. Denmark contrast</strong>: Denmark GDP growth 3.48% (2024) vs. Sweden 0.82% — yet Denmark can afford more ambitious agricultural climate spending. Sweden's Riksrevisionen finding that state efforts are "insufficient" places Sweden materially behind Denmark in agricultural climate governance.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Danish Ministry of Environment and Food confirmed targets 2022–2024.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator">2. Finland 🇫🇮 — Police Resource Distribution (Security Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator">2. Finland 🇫🇮 — Police Resource Distribution (Security Comparator)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-finland---police-resource-distribution-security-comparator"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD10439 Stockholm police shortage</p>
 <p>Finland's police reform (2013–2016) provides a cautionary tale for Sweden's HD10439 situation. Finland merged 24 police districts into 11, <strong>reducing operational presence in smaller cities while concentrating resources in Helsinki</strong>. The result was: improved response times in Helsinki (+8%) but <strong>rural policing deterioration</strong> that required emergency reversal 2019–2021.</p>
 <p>Sweden faces an analogous challenge: meeting the national 10,000-officer target (BRÅ confirmed) while Stockholm residents report visible patrol gaps. Finland's experience suggests that numerical targets without geographic distribution requirements produce structural metropolitan gaps.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy implication</strong>: HD03237 (paid police training) should include Stockholm-specific deployment allocation — as Denmark did when expanding Copenhagen police 2019.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Finnish National Police Board annual reports 2014–2022.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent">3. Germany 🇩🇪 — Fuel Tax / Climate Hypocrisy Precedent<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent">3. Germany 🇩🇪 — Fuel Tax / Climate Hypocrisy Precedent<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD03236 fuel tax + MJU21 compound</p>
 <p>Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt (fuel tax cut, €3 billion, June–August 2022) is the direct European precedent for Sweden's HD03236. Key findings:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-germany---fuel-tax--climate-hypocrisy-precedent">3. Germany 🇩
 <p><strong>Direct implication</strong>: Sweden's HD03236 fuel tax cut is following a well-documented European precedent that shows (a) limited electoral payoff and (b) measurable emissions cost. The MJU21 Riksrevisionen finding adds a third independently-documented climate accountability item to the same government's record.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — German Umweltbundesamt 2023, DIW Berlin 2022.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model">4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Constitutional Education Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model">4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Constitutional Education Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: HD11726 constitutional knowledge question</p>
 <p>Norway has a relatively strong model for constitutional civic education. In connection with the 2014 bicentenary of the Norwegian constitution, Norway launched:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-norway---constitutional-education-model">4. Norway 🇳🇴 — Con
 <p><strong>Policy recommendation</strong>: Sweden's Education Ministry HD11726 response should reference Norway's bicentenary model as a blueprint for a 2026 election-year constitutional literacy campaign.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM — Norwegian Ministry of Education reporting 2014–2020.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation">5. Netherlands 🇳🇱 — Audit Authority Climate Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation">5. Netherlands 🇳🇱 — Audit Authority Climate Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: MJU21 Riksrevisionen finding escalation risk</p>
 <p>The Netherlands' Algemene Rekenkamer (national audit court) issued a climate-transition finding in 2022 on agricultural emissions — and the institutional response provides a blueprint for Sweden:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1974,13 +1974,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-netherlands---audit-authority-climate-escalation">5. Netherlands 
 <p><strong>Warning for Sweden</strong>: Swedish LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) will use MJU21 to demand better government support; Swedish environmental NGOs will use it to demand stricter regulation. The government faces simultaneous pressure from both directions — exactly as the Dutch experienced 2021–2023.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — Algemene Rekenkamer 2022, Dutch Parliamentary Record 2022–2023.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference">6. EU Level — Pay Transparency Directive (Cross-Reference)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference">6. EU Level — Pay Transparency Directive (Cross-Reference)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-eu-level--pay-transparency-directive-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Relevance</strong>: From sibling interpellation analysis (IP437 — EU pay transparency directive failure)</p>
 <p>Sweden's documented failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970) on time is a compliance failure visible at EU level. The directive requires implementation by June 7, 2026. Sweden withdrew its implementation proposal (frs 2025/26:437 confirms). EU infringement proceedings typically take 12–18 months to reach formal decision — but the <strong>political embarrassment</strong> of being called out at EU institutions before September 13, 2026 is a live risk.</p>
 <p><strong>EU peer comparison</strong>: Of 27 member states, 19 have submitted implementation plans. Sweden and Hungary are the only member states to have withdrawn submitted plans. This is an unusual position for a country with a strong gender equality record.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — EU Commission transposition tracker 2025.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-scorecard">Summary Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-scorecard">Summary Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2030,11 +2030,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-scorecard">Summary Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Area</th><th align="center">Sweden's Position</th><th align="center">Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Agricultural climate</td><td align="center">Behind</td><td align="center">Significant (5+ years)</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>Police distribution</td><td align="center">Risk ahead</td><td align="center">Comparable challenge</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Fuel tax relief</td><td align="center">Following failed precedent</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>Constitutional education</td><td align="center">Behind</td><td align="center">Moderate</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>Audit escalation risk</td><td align="center">Comparable risk profile</td><td align="center">Monitor closely</td></tr><tr><td>EU</td><td>Pay transparency</td><td align="center">Non-compliant (rare)</td><td align="center">Critical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CLS ID</strong>: <code>CLS-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:36 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT[📋 Document Classification&#x3C;br/>Evening Analysis 2026-04-20] --> Q1{Personal data?}
     Q1 -->|No| Q2{Security sensitive?}
@@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-
     PUBLIC --> IP439_C[HD10439 — Police interpellation]
     PUBLIC --> FRAG_C[HD11720–11727 — Written questions]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2175,7 +2175,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Type</th><th align="center">Sensitivity</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th align="center">Urgency</th><th align="center">Significance</th><th align="center">Publication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>bet (KU)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional/Fiscal</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">PUBLISH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>bet (KU)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional/Ceremonial</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">MENTION</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>bet (MJU)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Environment/Agriculture</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">PUBLISH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>ip (S→M)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Security/Police</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">PUBLISH</td></tr><tr><td>HD11720</td><td>fr (C→L)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Environment/Industry</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11721</td><td>fr (C→KD)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Rural Development</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11722</td><td>fr (S→KD-Infrastructure)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Infrastructure/Civil Society</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11723</td><td>fr (SD→Industry)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Transport/Technology</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11724</td><td>fr (S→KD-Infrastructure)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Transport Safety</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11725</td><td>fr (S→Energy)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Energy/Environment</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>fr (S→Education)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional/Education</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">INCLUDE</td></tr><tr><td>HD11727</td><td>fr (S→Justice)</td><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Justice/Administration</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">CONTEXT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2218,17 +2218,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Policy Domain</th><th align="center">Documents</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Election Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Environment/Climate</td><td align="center">HD01MJU21, HD11720, HD11725</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Security/Justice/Police</td><td align="center">HD10439, HD11727</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">HD01KU42, HD01KU43, HD11726</td><td align="center">🟠 HIGH</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Infrastructure/Transport</td><td align="center">HD11722, HD11723, HD11724</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Rural/Agriculture/Energy</td><td align="center">HD11721, HD11725</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-urgency-classification">Urgency Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-urgency-classification">Urgency Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-classification"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Critical (respond within 24h)</strong>: None
 <strong>High (respond within 48–72h)</strong>: HD10439, HD01MJU21
 <strong>Medium (respond within 7 days)</strong>: HD01KU42, HD11726, HD11722, HD11724, HD11725
 <strong>Low (routine response)</strong>: HD01KU43, HD11720, HD11721, HD11723, HD11727</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>XRF ID</strong>: <code>XRF-2026-04-20-EVE001</code>
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:39 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "🌱 Climate Cluster"
         MJU21[HD01MJU21&#x3C;br/>Agricultural climate&#x3C;br/>Riksrevisionen]
@@ -2277,7 +2277,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" a
     style KU33 fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     style FR726 fill:#1565C0,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2362,28 +2362,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>This Document</th><th>Related Document</th><th>Relationship</th><th>Source</th><th>Type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>HD03236</td><td>MJU21 finding amplifies HD03236 climate hypocrisy</td><td>Sibling: PROP</td><td>Policy compound</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>HD024082</td><td>S motion (Damberg) cites same climate concern</td><td>Sibling: MOT</td><td>Opposition alignment</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>HD024098</td><td>MP motion (Alm Ericson) cites same climate concern</td><td>Sibling: MOT</td><td>Opposition alignment</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>HD03237</td><td>HD03237 is government's structural answer to HD10439 gap</td><td>Sibling: PROP</td><td>Policy response</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>HD10437</td><td>Previous S police interpellation (April 17); same minister</td><td>Sibling: IP</td><td>Escalation pattern</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Spring Economic Bill — KU42 debates appropriation structure against which HD03100 operates</td><td>Sibling: PROP</td><td>Constitutional link</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Constitutional knowledge question directly follows vilande passage of KU33</td><td>Sibling: CR</td><td>Temporal link</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional knowledge question directly follows vilande passage of KU32</td><td>Sibling: CR</td><td>Temporal link</td></tr><tr><td>HD11722</td><td>HD11724</td><td>Both filed by Ödebrink (S), both target Minister Carlson's infrastructure portfolio</td><td>Same day</td><td>Coordinated questions</td></tr><tr><td>HD11725</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Alum shale question + S's fuel tax motion = C+S environmental alignment</td><td>Sibling: MOT</td><td>Coalition rehearsal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound">Cluster A: Climate-Accountability Compound<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound">Cluster A: Climate-Accountability Compound<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-climate-accountability-compound"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🔴CRITICAL</p>
 <p>Connects: MJU21 (Riksrevisionen) ↔ HD03236 (fuel tax) ↔ MOT024082+98 (S+MP counter-motions) ↔ HD11725 (alum shale)</p>
 <p>This cluster represents the most structurally damaging accountability compound for the government. Three independently-sourced challenges to climate credibility, with an independent constitutional body (Riksrevisionen) as the primary anchor.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate">Cluster B: Police Security Debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate">Cluster B: Police Security Debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-police-security-debate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🔴HIGH</p>
 <p>Connects: HD10439 (new IP) ↔ HD10437 (previous IP) ↔ HD03237 (paid training)</p>
 <p>The police security debate has been running since April 15. HD10439 adds Stockholm specificity — from "national police numbers" to "where are the police in Stockholm?"</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain">Cluster C: Constitutional Awareness Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain">Cluster C: Constitutional Awareness Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c-constitutional-awareness-chain"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🟠HIGH</p>
 <p>Connects: KU33+KU32 vilande ↔ KU42 budget scrutiny ↔ HD11726 constitutional knowledge</p>
 <p>The constitutional awareness chain creates a coherent pre-election narrative: government is changing the constitution (KU33/KU32), managing the fiscal framework (KU42), but not educating citizens about what the constitution is (HD11726).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability">Cluster D: Infrastructure Carlson Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability">Cluster D: Infrastructure Carlson Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d-infrastructure-carlson-accountability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Electoral Weight</strong>: 🟠MEDIUM</p>
 <p>Connects: HD11722 ↔ HD11724 ↔ IP434 (sibling interpellation on housing starts)</p>
 <p>S is maintaining consistent pressure on Infrastructure Minister Carlson across multiple parliamentary instruments. Written questions, interpellations — the approach is multi-layered.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Analysis Version</strong>: v5.0 | <strong>Depth</strong>: deep</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2469,8 +2469,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Method</th><th align="center">Applied</th><th align="center">Quality</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Per-file analysis (v5.0)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>14 documents analyzed with specific citations</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT (8 stakeholder groups)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All 8 groups in stakeholder-perspectives.md</td></tr><tr><td>Risk matrix (L×I numeric)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>5 risks scored, heat map generated</td></tr><tr><td>Threat taxonomy (6 categories)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All 6 categories with severity and probability</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-reference map</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>4 thematic clusters, 10 cross-reference links</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario analysis (3 base + 2 wildcards)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>ACH grid populated</td></tr><tr><td>International comparative</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>6 jurisdictions benchmarked</td></tr><tr><td>Election 2026 lens</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>In synthesis-summary, SWOT, significance-scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labels on all claims</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>[HIGH]/[MEDIUM]/[LOW] throughout</td></tr><tr><td>Mermaid diagrams</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>≥2 per artifact (synthesis, risk, threat, SWOT)</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence tables with dok_ids</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All primary documents cited by dok_id</td></tr><tr><td>Forward indicators with triggers</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>≥5 indicators with dates</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17">Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17">Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Key watchpoints from previous run</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-evening-analysis-2026-04-17">Prior Evening Analysis (2026-04-17
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint (from 2026-04-17)</th><th align="center">Status Today (2026-04-20)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU constitutional summons of Finance Minister Svantesson</td><td align="center">🟧 IMMINENT</td><td>Realtime memory confirms KU hearing flagged for this week</td></tr><tr><td>EU-SUMMIT-20260422 preparation</td><td align="center">🟩 ON TRACK</td><td>Government Lebanon humanitarian aid (press release) shows active foreign policy</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21 committee report publication</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td>MJU21 published today as expected</td></tr><tr><td>S interpellation acceleration (wave-2)</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td>8 written questions + 1 interpellation today; pace 50%+ above average</td></tr><tr><td>Bernadotte diplomatic sensitivity (IP435)</td><td align="center">🟡 PENDING</td><td>No government response yet; April 30 deadline</td></tr><tr><td>Women's shelter closures narrative</td><td align="center">🟡 ONGOING</td><td>No new documents today but background risk remains</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428">Realtime Monitor Watchpoints (2026-04-20 earlier run — realtime-1428)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428">Realtime Monitor Watchpoints (2026-04-20 earlier run — realtime-1428)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>From memory: lead story "KU Summons Finance Minister Svantesson"</strong></p>
 
 
@@ -2546,7 +2546,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-realtime-monitor-watchpoints-2026-04-20-earlier-run--realtime-1428">R
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th align="center">This Evening's Relevance</th><th align="center">Resolution</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU constitutional accountability week</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td align="center">KU42 published today; constitutional scrutiny dominant theme</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21 as top agenda item</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td align="center">MJU21 is our #1 significance finding</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439 police interpellation (new)</td><td align="center">🟩 NEW TODAY</td><td align="center">Added to analysis as major finding</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition acceleration pre-EU Summit</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td align="center">8 questions today confirms pre-EU Summit pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419">Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 14–19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419">Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 14–19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2584,8 +2584,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-weeks-watchpoints-april-1419">Prior Weeks' Watchpoints (April 1
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Spring Economic Bill media narrative</td><td align="center">🟧 EVOLVING</td><td>GDP gap (0.82% vs Denmark 3.48%) remains problematic</td></tr><tr><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive failure</td><td align="center">🟩 DOCUMENTED</td><td>In sibling interpellation analysis (IP437)</td></tr><tr><td>4-party immigration coordination signal</td><td align="center">🟩 CONFIRMED</td><td>Motions analysis confirms election campaign architecture</td></tr><tr><td>NATO/Ukraine accountability (HD03231/232)</td><td align="center">🟩 PASSED</td><td>Cross-party support confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Women's shelters closure (IP438)</td><td align="center">🟡 PENDING</td><td>Larsson response still pending</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial-draft">Pass 1 (Initial draft)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial-draft"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence">Pass-1 → Pass-2 Improvement Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--pass-2-improvement-evidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1-initial-draft">Pass 1 (Initial draft)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial-draft"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Initial analysis focused primarily on individual document summaries</li>
 <li>Risk scoring was initially 3 risks; expanded to 5 after reading cross-reference patterns</li>
@@ -2593,12 +2593,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial-draft">Pass 1 (Initial draft)<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Scenario analysis initially only 2 scenarios; third "constitutional week" scenario added after cross-referencing HD11726 with KU33/KU32 context</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-20 17:31 UTC
 <strong>Analysis Type</strong>: evening-analysis
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Workflow</strong>: news-evening-analysis</p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong>: 14</p>
 
 
@@ -2711,13 +2711,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-analyzed">Documents Analyzed<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok ID</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Title</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>bet</td><td>KU</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>bet</td><td>KU</td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>bet</td><td>MJU</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser för jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>ip</td><td>—</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>HD11720</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Svensk lagstiftning om återvinning av kabel</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11721</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Fortsatt lokal förankring i Leader</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11722</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Trafikverkets minskade anslag till ideella organisationer</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11723</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Sveriges agerande kring EU-godkännande av självkörande fordonsteknik</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11724</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Transportstyrelsens olycksdatabas Strada</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11725</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Utredningen om kommunalt veto mot brytning i alunskiffer</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Kunskap om grundlagarna</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11727</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Statens servicecenters möjlighet att vidimera passkopior</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11726-1</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Kunskap om grundlagarna (svar)</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr><tr><td>HD11727-1</td><td>fr</td><td>—</td><td>Passkopior (svar)</td><td>✅ Summary</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering MCP: get_betankanden, get_interpellationer, get_fragor</li>
 <li>Sibling analysis cross-references: committeeReports, propositions, motions, interpellations</li>
 <li>Government press releases (g0v.se): Sverige ökar humanitärt stöd till Libanon (2026-04-19)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-completeness-assessment">Completeness Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-completeness-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-completeness-assessment">Completeness Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-completeness-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core committee reports</strong>: 3/3 (KU42, KU43, MJU21) — HIGH completeness</li>
 <li><strong>Interpellations (new)</strong>: 1/1 (HD10439) — HIGH completeness</li>
@@ -2725,10 +2725,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-completeness-assessment">Completeness Assessment<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>Sibling analysis integrated</strong>: committeeReports (6 docs), propositions (9 docs), motions (21 docs), interpellations (10 docs)</li>
 <li><strong>Government communications</strong>: 1 press release (Libanon aid increase)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-download-timestamps">Download Timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-download-timestamps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-download-timestamps">Download Timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-download-timestamps"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Script pipeline: 2026-04-20 17:29 UTC</li>
 <li>AI analysis: 2026-04-20 17:31 UTC</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -2766,7 +2783,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:05.228Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:26.616Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html b/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html
index be45d7912a..460490b5bc 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Interpellation Wave,">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.407Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.742Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.407Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:26.742Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-20T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Wave,","description":"Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 15 interpellations across the period — of which 10 are in scope for this analysis (HD10429–HD10438, including one…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:05.407Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10430-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10431-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10432-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10433-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10434-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10435-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10436-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10437-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10438-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Wave,","description":"Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 15 interpellations across the period — of which 10 are in scope for this analysis (HD10429–HD10438, including one…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:26.742Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10430-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10431-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10432-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10433-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10434-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10435-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10436-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10437-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10438-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -206,10 +206,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 15 interpellations across the period — of which <strong>10 are in scope for this analysis</strong> (<code>HD10429–HD10438</code>, including one withdrawal, HD10436). This 10-document set represents the largest concentrated accountability push of riksmöte 2025/26. The decisive signal is that <strong>Sweden will fail to transpose the EU Pay Transparency Directive by its June 7, 2026 deadline</strong>, after the government withdrew its own implementation proposal. This is documented in the official Riksdag record via interpellation 2025/26:437 (HD10437). The Social Democrats (S) are weaponising this failure through a coordinated pre-Election-2026 narrative with two April-17 twin interpellations against Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson (L), five accumulated interpellations against Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD), and an independent MP (El-Haj) pressing Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard (M) on historical Israel accountability with a 10-day response window. <strong>Government response strategy in the April 29–May 5 window will determine whether this wave converts into a durable Election-2026 narrative.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-strategic-findings">Top 5 Strategic Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-strategic-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-strategic-findings">Top 5 Strategic Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-strategic-findings"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p>🔴 <strong>Documented EU-directive transposition failure</strong> (HD10437, sig 9.2/10). Sweden's own withdrawal of its implementation proposal creates an <strong>irrefutable factual record</strong> that S will exploit for 6+ months running up to Election 2026. Government loses rhetorical manoeuvre room.</p>
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-strategic-findings">Top 5 Strategic Findings<a class="" aria-hi
 <p>🟡 <strong>Tactical withdrawal signal</strong> (HD10436, space industry, S/Wiking). Voluntary withdrawal suggests informal government-industry accommodation on strategic industrial policy — a <strong>positive</strong> signal for Nordic space-sector cooperation despite the broader accountability climate.</p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot">Ministerial Accountability Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot">Ministerial Accountability Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -304,14 +304,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot">Ministerial Accountability Snaps
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Minister</th><th>Party</th><th>Interp. count (active)</th><th>Nearest deadline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Andreas Carlson</td><td>KD</td><td>6+</td><td>April 29 (HD10434)</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Nina Larsson</td><td>L</td><td>2 (coordinated)</td><td>May 5</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>M</td><td>1+1 (HD10426+HD10435)</td><td>April 30 (URGENT)</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabeth Svantesson</td><td>M</td><td>1+1 (HD10433+HD10427)</td><td>April 29</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabet Lann</td><td>KD</td><td>2 (HD10432+HD10415)</td><td>May 5</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>Benjamin Dousa</td><td>M</td><td>1 (HD10431)</td><td>April 28</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>Jakob Forssmed</td><td>KD</td><td>1 (HD10430)</td><td>April 21</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer</td><td>M</td><td>1 (HD10429)</td><td>April 21</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Lotta Edholm</td><td>L</td><td>0 (HD10436 withdrawn)</td><td>—</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-implications-election-2026">Strategic Implications (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-election-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-implications-election-2026">Strategic Implications (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-election-2026"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S has a campaign spine</strong>: EU directive failure + women's shelters + billionaire tax paradox + housing decline + infrastructure saturation. These themes are mutually reinforcing and give S a coherent narrative arc.</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition fault lines surface</strong>: L minister failing on gender equality (core L brand), KD minister most-targeted (housing/infrastructure), SD applying inverted-expected pressure (HD10429 freedom-of-expression), C differentiating on LGBTQI+ rights (HD10431). The Tidö arrangement is showing strain.</li>
 <li><strong>The June 7 EU deadline is a countdown clock</strong>: S gains one more headline every week Larsson fails to announce implementation progress. The campaign narrative extends naturally into summer.</li>
 <li><strong>Diplomatic exposure</strong>: HD10435 (Bernadotte) forces a Swedish foreign-policy position on Israel that Malmer Stenergard has so far managed to keep general. The three explicit demands (accountability/apology/compensation) prevent general framing.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness">Recommended Government Counter-Moves (for situational awareness)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness">Recommended Government Counter-Moves (for situational awareness)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness">Recom
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Neutralising move</th><th>Likely?</th><th>Political cost</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10437 EU directive</td><td>Pre-deadline transposition announcement by May 20</td><td>P=0.35</td><td>Medium (coalition negotiation)</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438 shelters</td><td>Emergency kvinnojour funding package</td><td>P=0.45</td><td>Low–medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434 housing</td><td>PBL reform + construction-loan guarantee</td><td>P=0.30</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433 tax</td><td>Announcement of a targeted review</td><td>P=0.55</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td>HD10435 Bernadotte</td><td>Firm but narrow historical acknowledgement</td><td>P=0.65</td><td>Low (satisfies most expectations)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days">What to Watch (Next 14 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days">What to Watch (Next 14 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>April 21 ANM of HD10437 + HD10438 (chamber announcement)</li>
 <li>April 21 chamber debate on HD10429 (freedom of expression) and HD10430 (mosques)</li>
@@ -364,20 +364,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days">What to Watch (Next 14 days)<a class="" a
 <li>May 5 responses: HD10437 (EU directive), HD10438 (shelters)</li>
 <li>Weekly: Swedish polling (Novus, Sifo, Demoskop) — any S bounce from the coordinated attacks</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line">Bottom Line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line">Bottom Line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line"></a></h3>
 <p>This interpellation wave is the <strong>first clear evidence</strong> of S operating in full pre-election accountability mode. The coordination, the documentary record (EU directive withdrawal, Länsstyrelsen data, El-Haj's three demands), and the clustering of response deadlines in April 29 – May 5 make it operationally significant. The next 14 days will determine whether the government neutralises this pressure or allows it to compound into a durable narrative running to September 2026.</p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Analysis confidence</strong>: HIGH — Primary sources (MCP full text of HD10437, HD10438, HD10435, HD10434, HD10433), government authority data (Länsstyrelsen Stockholm), World Bank macro indicators
 <strong>Human editorial oversight</strong>: Required before publication (AI_Policy.md)
 <strong>Next update</strong>: 2026-04-29 (post-Carlson-response review)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: Deep | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's opposition Social Democrats (S) have entered their most intensive pre-election parliamentary accountability phase, filing 7 of 10 interpellations since April 14 and 2 on the same day (April 17) targeting the same minister (Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson, L) on coordinated gender equality themes. The discovery that Sweden will FAIL to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive on time — after the government withdrew its own implementation proposal (frs 2025/26:437) — represents the most politically significant parliamentary development of the current session. Combined with documented women's shelter closures (frs 2025/26:438), this creates a "gender accountability double bind" that L's liberal minister cannot easily escape. Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD) now faces his 6th+ interpellation, cementing S's "infrastructure failure" narrative. Independent MP Jamal El-Haj's interpellation demanding Israeli accountability for the 1948 assassination of Folke Bernadotte (frs 2025/26:435) carries a 10-day response deadline and will force Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard (M) into the most diplomatically sensitive response of the current session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings">Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings">Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>[HIGH] S coordinates dual gender equality attack</strong>: Amloh files two interpellations on same day targeting same minister (Nina Larsson, L) — frs 2025/26:437 (EU directive failure) + frs 2025/26:438 (women's shelter closures). SISVA both May 5.</p>
@@ -396,20 +396,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings">Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)<a clas
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-article-decision">Article Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-article-decision">Article Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Publish</strong>: YES — High newsworthiness<br>
 <strong>Priority</strong>: 1 (Immediate)<br>
 <strong>Recommended Article Type</strong>: Interpellation Debates<br>
 <strong>Analysis Depth Achieved</strong>: Deep (2 passes completed)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>: Sweden Misses EU Pay Equality Deadline as Opposition Mounts Coordinated Pre-Election Accountability Campaign</p>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (SV)</strong>: Sverige missar EU:s lönetransparensdirektiv när oppositionen intensifierar valrörelseoffensiven</p>
 <p><strong>Meta Description (EN)</strong>: S files two coordinated interpellations targeting Gender Minister Nina Larsson on pay transparency failure and women's shelter closures, as parliament enters an intensive accountability phase ahead of 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>: S lämnar in två samordnade interpellationer mot jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson om EU-direktiv och kvinnojourer, medan riksdagen intensifierar granskning inför valet 2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment">Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment">Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -446,14 +446,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment">Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Analysis</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Gender gap</strong></td><td>S's dual filing on gender equality is explicitly pre-election. Women's shelter closures + EU pay directive = powerful combination for 2026</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition vulnerability</strong></td><td>L (liberal) minister presiding over gender equality failures creates L-M-KD coalition tension</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carlson/KD accountability</strong></td><td>Most-targeted minister in KD is KD's infrastructure minister — KD will need to defend portfolio in election</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter salience</strong></td><td>Women's safety (shelters) is top-10 voter issue; housing construction decline affects young voters directly</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign vulnerability</strong></td><td>Government has no easy answer to EU directive failure — factual record established in parliament</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-scenario-implications">Coalition Scenario Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-scenario-implications">Coalition Scenario Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-implications"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Red-Green government (S-led)</strong>: S's interpellation campaign is laying pre-election foundation. EU directive, women's shelters, housing, tax fairness are all coalition-building themes with V and MP [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</li>
 <li><strong>Continued M-KD-SD-L government</strong>: Can win re-election only if they neutralize the accountability narratives. Carlson's portfolio weakness is the most exposed [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</li>
 <li><strong>Centre-right realignment (M + C + L)</strong>: C's LGBTQ+ interpellation (HD10431) positions them as distinct from SD-leaning government. C may differentiate on human rights [LOW confidence 🟥]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-summary">Ministerial Accountability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-summary">Ministerial Accountability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     S[S Oppositionen] -->|frs 437+438 April 17| NL[Nina Larsson L]
     S -->|frs 434 April 15| AC[Andreas Carlson KD]
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-summary">Ministerial Accountability Summar
     style JF fill:#dddddd
     style GS fill:#dddddd</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-note">Data Quality Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-note">Data Quality Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-note"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text available: HD10437, HD10438, HD10435, HD10434, HD10433 (verified via get_dokument)</li>
 <li>Summary data: HD10432, HD10431, HD10430, HD10429</li>
@@ -481,15 +481,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-quality-note">Data Quality Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>World Bank data: Sweden GDP growth 2024 0.82%, unemployment 2025 8.694%, inflation 2024 2.836%</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analytic framework</strong>: Structured Analytic Techniques (SATs) — ACH, Key Assumptions Check, Red Team / Devil's Advocate
 <strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Confidence baseline</strong>: HIGH | <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2</p>
 <p>This document applies three structured analytic techniques to pressure-test the main intelligence judgements about the April 14–17 interpellation wave. It is designed to surface hidden assumptions, force consideration of alternative explanations, and reduce the risk of mirror-imaging or confirmation bias.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Part 1 — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-central-question">Central Question<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-central-question"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Part 1 — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-central-question">Central Question<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-central-question"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>What is the primary driver of the observed April 14–17 interpellation wave from S?</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-candidate-hypotheses">Candidate Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-candidate-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-candidate-hypotheses">Candidate Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-candidate-hypotheses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-candidate-hypotheses">Candidate Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Hypothesis</th><th>A priori plausibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1</td><td><strong>Coordinated pre-Election-2026 accountability campaign</strong> — S has moved from reactive opposition to proactive campaign-aligned parliamentary strategy</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>H2</td><td><strong>Opportunistic response to individual policy failures</strong> — No overall coordination; each MP reacting to constituent/sector pressure on policy-by-policy basis</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>H3</td><td><strong>Internal S party-discipline exercise</strong> — New leadership pushing MPs to demonstrate activity; not primarily campaign-driven</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>H4</td><td><strong>Coalition-partner-signal seeking</strong> — S is attempting to probe where the government coalition is internally weakest (testing Tidö fault lines)</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>H5</td><td><strong>Background base-rate noise</strong> — April is a typical high-interpellation month; no special pattern</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-matrix">Evidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-matrix">Evidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-matrix"></a></h4>
 <p>Legend: ✓✓ (strongly supports), ✓ (weakly supports), ✗ (weakly inconsistent), ✗✗ (strongly inconsistent), — (neutral)</p>
 
 
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-evidence-matrix">Evidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th align="center">Weakly inconsistent (✗)</th><th align="center">Strongly inconsistent (✗✗)</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1 Campaign</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>H2 Opportunistic</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">3</td></tr><tr><td>H3 Discipline</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>H4 Fault-line</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>H5 Noise</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-ach-conclusion">ACH Conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-conclusion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ach-conclusion">ACH Conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-conclusion"></a></h4>
 <p>Following Heuer's ACH logic (focus on inconsistency, not consistency):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>H5 "Background noise" is falsified</strong> (6 inconsistencies, including 2 strong). The coordination signals are too dense and too specific to be coincidence.</li>
@@ -691,9 +691,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-ach-conclusion">ACH Conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Final judgement</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The wave is a <strong>coordinated pre-Election-2026 S accountability campaign</strong> (H1), incorporating deliberate coalition-fault-line probing (H4 as component). El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation is a <strong>parallel independent track</strong> that S tolerates but does not coordinate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check">Part 2 — Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check">Part 2 — Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 <p>For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and tested for vulnerability.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline">Judgement: "Sweden will miss the EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition deadline"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline">Judgement: "Sweden will miss the EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition deadline"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transpos
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>A1. The government withdrew its implementation proposal and has not re-submitted</td><td>✅ Verified</td><td>Stated in HD10437 full text; consistent with no proposition in Riksdagen database</td></tr><tr><td>A2. Transposition requires passage of national legislation (not just administrative act)</td><td>✅ Verified</td><td>Directive 2023/970/EU Art. 34 explicitly requires laws, regulations, administrative provisions</td></tr><tr><td>A3. Sweden has no emergency alternative path to compliance by June 7</td><td>⚠️ Partial</td><td>Emergency legislation possible but would require cross-party accord; no signal of such</td></tr><tr><td>A4. EU Commission will treat non-transposition as infringement</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Standard Commission practice; grace period typically 2–4 months</td></tr><tr><td>A5. The interpellation text is accurate on directive content</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Matches published directive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Primary assumptions hold. A3 is the only hedged assumption — emergency legislation is theoretically possible but politically unlikely.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode">Judgement: "S is operating in coordinated pre-election mode"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode">Judgement: "S is operating in coordinated pre-election mode"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode">Judgement:
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>B1. The Amloh dual-filing is strategic, not coincidental</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Same MP, same day, same minister, related topics — probability of coincidence &#x3C;5%</td></tr><tr><td>B2. S has internal communication coordinating interpellation filings</td><td>⚠️ Cannot directly verify</td><td>Inferred from pattern; consistent with public S party-whip structures</td></tr><tr><td>B3. Election 2026 is a primary strategic driver</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Election date (September 2026) within 5 months; polling proximity</td></tr><tr><td>B4. The tactical withdrawal of HD10436 reflects conscious prioritisation</td><td>⚠️ Moderate</td><td>Alternative: minister provided informal assurance</td></tr><tr><td>B5. The 7-of-10 S share is significantly above baseline</td><td>⚠️ Partial</td><td>Historical S share of interpellations ~40–60%; 70% is elevated but not unprecedented</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: B1, B3 are strong. B2, B4, B5 carry more uncertainty — but their combination remains convergent evidence of coordination.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable">Judgement: "Carlson (KD) is electorally vulnerable"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable">Judgement: "Carlson (KD) is electorally vulnerable"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -802,31 +802,31 @@ <h3 id="rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable">Judgement: "Carlson (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C1. Interpellation count correlates with ministerial vulnerability</td><td>⚠️ Partial</td><td>True in expectation; not deterministic</td></tr><tr><td>C2. Housing is top-5 voter concern</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Consistent polling evidence</td></tr><tr><td>C3. Carlson's response quality has been inadequate</td><td>⚠️ Moderate</td><td>Qualitative; requires review of prior responses</td></tr><tr><td>C4. Stockholm is a swing region</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Historical SCB election data</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Main argument holds; specific vulnerability depends on C3 which warrants direct verification of prior Carlson interpellation responses (planned for next iteration).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-systemic-assumption-check">Systemic Assumption Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-systemic-assumption-check"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-systemic-assumption-check">Systemic Assumption Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-systemic-assumption-check"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>We assume <strong>S leadership coordinates interpellations</strong>. If this is wrong (e.g., S is more decentralised than modelled), the "campaign" judgement weakens into "spontaneous opportunism" (H2).</li>
 <li>We assume <strong>interpellations convert to electoral advantage</strong>. This requires media amplification and campaign operationalisation — both are plausible but not guaranteed.</li>
 <li>We assume <strong>government responses will be recognisable as "weak" if they are weak</strong>. Media framing can reverse this in either direction.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate">Part 3 — Red Team / Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave">Red Team Position 1: "The government will neutralise the wave"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate">Part 3 — Red Team / Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave">Red Team Position 1: "The government will neutralise the wave"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: The government has the institutional resources and ministerial experience to defuse each interpellation individually. By May 5, Larsson will likely announce a Pay Transparency Directive implementation plan (possibly by interim administrative measure). Svantesson will signal tax review. Carlson will announce a housing package. The wave will peak on April 29–May 5 and then dissipate. By June, it will be last-month news.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) Ministerial experience (Svantesson 3+ years, Strömmer 3+ years); (2) Government can set policy agenda through propositioner; (3) Media cycle is short; (4) Summer recess dampens parliamentary salience.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: This is a <strong>plausible counter-scenario</strong> (P≈0.25). It assumes the government is strategically aware and operationally unified. The counter-counter: the coalition's internal tensions (L minister, KD minister, SD pressure) complicate unified response. But it cannot be dismissed.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand">Red Team Position 2: "S is overplaying their hand"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand">Red Team Position 2: "S is overplaying their hand"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: 15 interpellations in 2 weeks is <strong>too much</strong>. Voters do not distinguish between 5 interpellations and 15 interpellations — both register as "noise." By trying to saturate across housing, gender, tax, foreign policy, healthcare, S risks diluting focus. A tighter, punchier campaign would be more effective. The tactical withdrawal of HD10436 supports this critique: S is now recognising the saturation risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) Voter cognitive bandwidth limits; (2) Media only covers top 2–3 stories per day; (3) HD10436 withdrawal pattern; (4) Historical campaign literature on message discipline.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>Valid critique</strong> but partially mitigated by (a) parallel targeted attacks on individual ministers (Carlson, Larsson) that <em>are</em> focused; (b) the dual-filing choreography which <em>concentrates</em> rather than dilutes attention. The saturation risk is real but currently managed.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire">Red Team Position 3: "El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation will backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire">Red Team Position 3: "El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation will backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: Sweden's political culture generally avoids open confrontation with allies on historical grievances. El-Haj, as an independent without party backing, lacks institutional weight. The interpellation may attract fringe support but could alienate mainstream voters who view it as excessive. The Foreign Ministry will give a narrow historical-acknowledgement response, and the issue will be parked.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) Swedish mainstream foreign-policy tradition; (2) El-Haj's independent status limits leverage; (3) Israel-Sweden formal relations remain functional; (4) Media may frame as marginal voice.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>Partially valid</strong>. It is likely that the substantive demands will not be met. But the <strong>reputational cost</strong> is not primarily about whether Israel apologises — it is about whether Sweden's foreign minister can articulate a coherent position. Even a "narrow historical acknowledgement" becomes a news event. The Red Team position is too narrow.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative">Red Team Position 4: "The economic context undermines S's narrative"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative">Red Team Position 4: "The economic context undermines S's narrative"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: Sweden's inflation has cooled (2.836% in 2024 from 8.5% in 2023); real wages are recovering; unemployment, while elevated at 8.694%, has structural components unrelated to government policy. By September 2026, economic conditions may have improved enough that accountability narratives appear dated. The government could point to macro stabilisation as counter-evidence.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) World Bank data shows cooling inflation; (2) ECB rate cuts expected 2025–2026; (3) Sweden's labour-market structure mean unemployment has cyclical + structural components.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>Valid macroeconomic critique</strong>. S's narrative leans on micro-level failures (housing, shelters, EU compliance) precisely <em>because</em> the macro story is mixed. This is a sophisticated targeting — the macro is harder to attack, so S focuses on verifiable micro-failures. Red Team critique is correct that the macro context is not supportive, but this is <em>why</em> S's strategy is what it is.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-devils-advocate-summary">Devil's Advocate Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-devils-advocate-summary">Devil's Advocate Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-devils-advocate-summary">Devil's Advocate Summary<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Red Team position</th><th>Strength</th><th>Update to main judgement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RT1 — Government neutralises</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Add scenario (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td>RT2 — S overplays</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Qualify: saturation risk is real but managed</td></tr><tr><td>RT3 — El-Haj backfires</td><td>Weak</td><td>No update</td></tr><tr><td>RT4 — Macro undermines narrative</td><td>Valid observation</td><td>Already accounts for it (S targets micro, not macro)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-integrity-checklist">Analytic Integrity Checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-integrity-checklist"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-integrity-checklist">Analytic Integrity Checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-integrity-checklist"></a></h3>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> ACH matrix completed across 5 hypotheses</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> Inconsistency-counting (not consistency-counting) applied</li>
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytic-integrity-checklist">Analytic Integrity Checklist<a class=""
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> No evidence ignored (including counter-evidence)</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> Analytic integrity: conclusions modified by Red Team where warranted</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat">Final Intelligence Judgements (Post-SAT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat">Final Intelligence Judgements (Post-SAT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>[HIGH confidence 🟩] S is operating a <strong>coordinated pre-Election-2026 accountability campaign</strong> (H1, with H4 as component)</li>
 <li>[HIGH confidence 🟩] Sweden will <strong>fail</strong> to transpose EU Pay Transparency Directive by June 7, 2026 unless emergency legislation is enacted</li>
@@ -888,9 +888,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat">Final Intelligence Judgements
 <li>UK Ministry of Defence, <em>Red Teaming Handbook</em> (2021).</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Scoring Framework</strong>: Newsworthiness × Political Impact × Accountability Pressure</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-significance-matrix">Ranked Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-significance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-significance-matrix">Ranked Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -974,18 +974,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-significance-matrix">Ranked Significance Matrix<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Score</th><th>Dimensions</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>HD10437</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:437</td><td><strong>9.2/10</strong></td><td>EU compliance failure, government accountability, election 2026 gender gap</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>HD10435</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:435</td><td><strong>9.0/10</strong></td><td>Diplomatic controversy, historical justice, urgent deadline April 30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>HD10438</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:438</td><td><strong>8.5/10</strong></td><td>Women's safety, closure crisis, direct policy question</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>HD10433</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:433</td><td><strong>7.8/10</strong></td><td>Systemic tax fairness, Sweden's billionaire paradox, pre-election campaign</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>HD10434</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:434</td><td><strong>7.2/10</strong></td><td>Quantified housing decline (900 units), Carlson pressure escalation</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td><strong>HD10432</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:432</td><td><strong>6.5/10</strong></td><td>Healthcare infrastructure investment gap, state role in regional care</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td><strong>HD10431</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:431</td><td><strong>6.0/10</strong></td><td>International LGBTQ+ rights, foreign aid policy coherence</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td><strong>HD10429</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:429</td><td><strong>5.5/10</strong></td><td>Freedom of expression, SD challenging Moderaterna on prop 2025/26:133</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td><strong>HD10430</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:430</td><td><strong>5.2/10</strong></td><td>Mosque hate-speech scrutiny, SD-KD minister accountability</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td><strong>HD10436</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:436</td><td><strong>4.0/10</strong></td><td>WITHDRAWN — signals political negotiation in space policy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-top-finding-narrative">Top Finding Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-finding-narrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-finding-narrative">Top Finding Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-finding-narrative"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY SIGNIFICANCE</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Sweden's social democratic opposition (S) has filed two interpellations on the same day (April 17, 2026) targeting the same minister (Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson, L) on related gender equality topics. Interpellation frs 2025/26:437 reveals that Sweden will FAIL to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive on time after the government withdrew its implementation proposal — a serious EU compliance breach that strengthens S's pre-election narrative on gender equality and European commitment. The simultaneous filing of frs 2025/26:438 on women's shelter closures compounds the pressure by adding a direct human cost dimension: women fleeing domestic violence losing access to crisis shelters.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY SIGNIFICANCE</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Interpellation frs 2025/26:435 (HD10435) by independent MP Jamal El-Haj connecting the 1948 assassination of Folke Bernadotte to contemporary Israeli death penalty legislation carries an unusually close response deadline (April 30, 2026 — 10 days away) and makes three explicit demands for Israeli accountability, diplomatic apology, and financial compensation. This interpellation will test Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard's (M) capacity to maintain Sweden's human rights profile while managing diplomatic relations with Israel.</p>
 <p><strong>TERTIARY SIGNIFICANCE</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The withdrawal of interpellation frs 2025/26:436 on the Swedish space industry by Mats Wiking (S) is politically notable. Withdrawals typically indicate either a negotiated government commitment or tactical repositioning. Given that Sweden's space sector (Kiruna/Esrange) is a key industrial and NATO-adjacent strategic asset, this withdrawal merits monitoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context-relevance">Economic Context Relevance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context-relevance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context-relevance">Economic Context Relevance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context-relevance"></a></h3>
 <p>The following World Bank indicators provide quantitative grounding:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden GDP growth 2024: <strong>0.82%</strong> (down from 5.2% in 2021) — supports tax reform urgency (HD10433) [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</li>
 <li>Sweden unemployment 2025: <strong>8.694%</strong> (rising trend) — supports labor market/integration interpellations [HIGH confidence 🟩]</li>
 <li>Sweden inflation 2024: <strong>2.836%</strong> (down from 8.5% in 2023) — cost-of-living context for housing (HD10434) [HIGH confidence 🟩]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology">Multi-Dimensional Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology">Multi-Dimensional Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>Each interpellation is scored across <strong>five dimensions</strong> on a 0–10 scale, with weights reflecting political-intelligence priorities. The aggregate is computed as a weighted mean.</p>
 
 
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology">Multi-Dimensional Scoring Meth
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th>What it measures</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Newsworthiness</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Media-framing potential, public interest, sensational element</td></tr><tr><td>Political Impact</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Effect on government policy, coalition dynamics, electoral calculus</td></tr><tr><td>Accountability Pressure</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>How tightly the interpellation constrains ministerial response options</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence Density</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>Volume of verifiable facts in the interpellation text</td></tr><tr><td>Timing Sensitivity</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Proximity of response deadline and policy-clock constraints (e.g., EU directive)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown">Detailed Scoring Breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown">Detailed Scoring Breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1129,22 +1129,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown">Detailed Scoring Breakdown<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th align="center">News</th><th align="center">Pol.Imp</th><th align="center">Acct</th><th align="center">Evid</th><th align="center">Timing</th><th align="center">Weighted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10437</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center"><strong>9.24</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10435</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center">8.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center"><strong>8.53</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.0</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center"><strong>7.80</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">6.5</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">6.5</td><td align="center"><strong>6.43</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10431</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">6.5</td><td align="center"><strong>5.90</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center"><strong>5.60</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center"><strong>5.30</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10436</td><td align="center">4.0</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">2.0</td><td align="center">3.0</td><td align="center">0.0</td><td align="center"><strong>3.35</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-highlights">Dimension Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-highlights"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-highlights">Dimension Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-highlights"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Highest newsworthiness</strong>: HD10437, HD10435 (both 9.5). Documented EU failure + historical-assassination diplomatic demands both have strong media hooks.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest political impact</strong>: HD10437 (9.5). Impacts coalition (L minister), opposition campaign, and EU relations simultaneously.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest accountability pressure</strong>: HD10437, HD10435 (both 9.0). Both interpellations force binary ministerial choices.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest evidence density</strong>: HD10437 (10.0). Directive number, date, deadline, proposal-withdrawal all verifiable in the text.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest timing sensitivity</strong>: HD10435 (9.5). 10-day response window + political urgency.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-grading-of-scores">Confidence Grading of Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-grading-of-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-grading-of-scores">Confidence Grading of Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-grading-of-scores"></a></h3>
 <p>Scores are analyst estimates on a 10-point scale. Inter-rater reliability was not formally measured (single-analyst process), but scores were stress-tested by:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Cross-check against historical interpellations (<em>Statsministerdatabasen</em>, Riksdag records)</li>
 <li>Benchmark against published editorial coverage where available</li>
 <li>Red-Team re-scoring of top-3 documents (no material change)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-historical-context">Comparative Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-historical-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-historical-context">Comparative Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-historical-context"></a></h3>
 <p>The top-scoring interpellation of the 2025/26 session prior to this wave was HD10413 <em>(frs 2025/26:413, energy-supply question to Ebba Busch/KD)</em> at 7.8/10. <strong>HD10437 (9.24) is the highest-scoring interpellation of rm 2025/26 to date.</strong> This alone is a significant political-intelligence signal: the peak accountability pressure of the session has shifted from energy policy to gender equality / EU compliance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-prepost-election-significance-decay">Pre/Post-Election Significance Decay<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prepost-election-significance-decay"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prepost-election-significance-decay">Pre/Post-Election Significance Decay<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prepost-election-significance-decay"></a></h3>
 <p>An interpellation's significance decays differently depending on its type:</p>
 
 
@@ -1184,25 +1184,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-prepost-election-significance-decay">Pre/Post-Election Significance D
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Decay profile</th><th>Example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Documented-failure</strong> type</td><td>Slow decay; value compounds until resolution</td><td>HD10437 — gains value until June 7 deadline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Force-position</strong> type</td><td>Medium decay; peaks at response, then declines</td><td>HD10435 — peaks April 30</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Brand-signalling</strong> type</td><td>Medium decay; stable value over 6–12 months</td><td>HD10429, HD10431</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saturation-targeting</strong> type</td><td>Aggregates with other interpellations</td><td>HD10434 — part of Carlson portfolio attack</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Withdrawn</strong></td><td>Flat but not zero; signals process information</td><td>HD10436 — informational value only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication for Election 2026 campaign planning</strong>: Documented-failure type (HD10437 in particular) should be the <strong>centrepiece</strong> of S's pre-election messaging because its significance grows through summer. Force-position type (HD10435) should be deployed at the April 30 response moment and then retired. Brand-signalling is for steady-state differentiation, not peak moments.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Framework</strong>: Multi-actor perspective analysis</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-minister-perspectives-government-side">Minister Perspectives (Government Side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-perspectives-government-side"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister">Nina Larsson (L — Jämställdhetsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-minister-perspectives-government-side">Minister Perspectives (Government Side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-perspectives-government-side"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister">Nina Larsson (L — Jämställdhetsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Under dual coordinated attack from S. Must respond to both frs 2025/26:437 (EU Pay Transparency) and frs 2025/26:438 (women's shelter closures) by May 5.</p>
 <p><strong>Expected Response Strategy</strong>: Larsson will likely argue that (1) the Pay Transparency Directive implementation is complex and quality of Swedish implementation matters more than speed; (2) women's shelters receive support through existing mechanisms, and responsibility is distributed across government. However, the documented withdrawal of the implementation proposal means she cannot dispute the timeline failure on HD10437.</p>
 <p><strong>Vulnerability Assessment</strong>: [HIGH] The withdrawn proposal is a factual record that S will use in election 2026 campaign materials. L as a liberal party claiming gender equality credentials while presiding over directive failure creates internal party contradictions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister">Andreas Carlson (KD — Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister">Andreas Carlson (KD — Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Most-targeted minister in rm 2025/26 with 6+ interpellations. Housing/infrastructure portfolio encompasses strategic military bases, regional airports (Torsby/Hagfors via HD10424), emergency airports (Scandinavian Mountain via HD10428), highway safety (Riksväg 62 via HD10418), and now Stockholm housing construction decline (HD10434).</p>
 <p><strong>Expected Response Strategy</strong>: Market-based solutions, municipal responsibility, and long-term planning arguments. However, the breadth of failures documented across his portfolio makes a coherent narrative difficult.</p>
 <p><strong>Vulnerability Assessment</strong>: [HIGH] The cumulative interpellation record creates a pattern narrative that S is actively building. Each response that fails to commit to concrete action becomes another data point.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister">Maria Malmer Stenergard (M — Utrikesminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister">Maria Malmer Stenergard (M — Utrikesminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Faces the politically sensitive Bernadotte interpellation with an April 30 deadline.</p>
 <p><strong>Expected Response Strategy</strong>: The Swedish government will almost certainly decline to demand compensation and apology from Israel, citing the limitations of diplomatic intervention in historical matters, the complexity of Israel-Sweden relations, and that the 1948 events fall outside current bilateral frameworks. However, the question of Swedish government acknowledgment of Israel's responsibility is harder to evade given that the assassins' identities are documented.</p>
 <p><strong>Vulnerability Assessment</strong>: [MEDIUM] Malmer Stenergard has already publicly criticized Israeli death penalty legislation. She can partially satisfy the interpellation by noting that position, while deflecting the historical demands. The El-Haj interpellation is politically charged but the independent MP has limited parliamentary leverage.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-actor-perspectives">Opposition Actor Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-actor-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor">Socialdemokraterna (S) — Primary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-actor-perspectives">Opposition Actor Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-actor-perspectives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor">Socialdemokraterna (S) — Primary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategy</strong>: Coordinated, thematic interpellation campaign across gender equality, housing, healthcare, and taxation. The dual April 17 filing targeting Larsson signals S's gender equality campaign is entering its intensive phase.</p>
 <p><strong>Key S Actors</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1213,28 +1213,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor">Socialdemokratern
 <li><strong>Mats Wiking</strong> (frs 2025/26:436): Space industry — <strong>withdrew</strong> interpellation (tactical retreat?)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political Significance</strong>: S's 7 new interpellations since April 14 demonstrate disciplined pre-election strategy, targeting both the government's EU compliance record and domestic welfare failures.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor">Sverigedemokraterna (SD) — Secondary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor">Sverigedemokraterna (SD) — Secondary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategy</strong>: Two interpellations targeting freedom of expression (frs 2025/26:429 — justice minister Strömmer, M) and mosque oversight (frs 2025/26:430 — social minister Forssmed, KD). SD is operating in its traditional lanes: national identity, freedom of expression, and scrutiny of religious institutions.</p>
 <p><strong>Significance</strong>: The mosque interpellation (HD10430 by Richard Jomshof — senior SD MP) targets a KD minister on an issue where SD and KD have policy differences. This represents intra-coalition pressure rather than opposition-government confrontation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus">Centerpartiet (C) — Targeted International Focus<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus">Centerpartiet (C) — Targeted International Focus<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Anna Lasses</strong> (frs 2025/26:431): LGBTQ+ rights in foreign aid — positions C as a progressive voice on international human rights. This interpellation targets M's development minister Dousa, testing whether the government's foreign aid policy reflects Sweden's human rights commitments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-jamal-el-haj-independent">Jamal El-Haj (Independent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jamal-el-haj-independent"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-jamal-el-haj-independent">Jamal El-Haj (Independent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jamal-el-haj-independent"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Background</strong>: Formerly affiliated with S before leaving the party. Now independent (-). His Bernadotte interpellation is the most detailed and historically ambitious of the period — a 1,500-word document connecting 1948 to 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Significance</strong>: El-Haj's presence as an independent enables him to raise Israel-Palestine issues more directly than S party leadership would sanction. The three explicit demands (accountability, apology, compensation) go further than Swedish government policy.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-institutional-perspectives">Institutional Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-riksdag-chamber">Riksdag Chamber<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-chamber"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-institutional-perspectives">Institutional Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-perspectives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-riksdag-chamber">Riksdag Chamber<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-chamber"></a></h4>
 <p>The announcement (ANM) of frs 2025/26:437 and frs 2025/26:438 is scheduled for April 21, 2026 (tomorrow). This will place gender equality in the parliamentary spotlight immediately.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder">EU Commission (External Stakeholder)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder">EU Commission (External Stakeholder)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's failure to implement the Pay Transparency Directive on time (frs 2025/26:437) creates a compliance obligation for the Commission. If Sweden does not formally respond, infringement proceedings are available under EU law. The Commission typically grants grace periods before formal action but the political accountability occurs domestically through parliamentary scrutiny.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Horizon</strong>: 14 days (response window) + 5 months (to Election 2026, September 2026)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Morphological scenario construction with key-uncertainty decomposition
 <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2 (pass 1 draft + pass 2 stress-test)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Four alternative futures for the April 29 – May 5 response window and subsequent political dynamics through September 2026. Probabilities are analyst estimates, sum to ~1.0 (minor overlap intentional). Each scenario covers: trigger, pathway, political effect, Election 2026 implication, and observable indicators to discriminate between scenarios early.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology">Key Uncertainties (2-axis morphology)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology">Key Uncertainties (2-axis morphology)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology"></a></h3>
 <p>The scenarios are generated from the <strong>Cartesian product of two decisive uncertainties</strong>:</p>
 <p><strong>Axis A — Government response quality</strong> (April 29 – May 5 window):</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1248,8 +1248,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology">Key Uncertainties (2-axis morpho
 </ul>
 <p>The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1">Scenario 1 — "Neutralisation" (A1 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-sustained">Government strong + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-sustained"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1">Scenario 1 — "Neutralisation" (A1 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-strong--s-sustained">Government strong + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-sustained"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.20</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: By May 5, Larsson announces interim EU Pay Transparency Directive measures by administrative regulation, pending legislation; Svantesson signals a narrow tax review; Carlson announces a SEK 5–10 billion housing/construction-loan guarantee package; the government also announces SEK 100–150 million emergency kvinnojour funding. S continues the campaign with follow-up motions and committee hearings but is deprived of the "inaction" framing.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: The interpellation wave is <strong>converted into policy concessions</strong> rather than electoral momentum. S's campaign is damaged but survives through autumn policy debates. Coalition demonstrates operational effectiveness.</p>
@@ -1267,8 +1267,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-sustained">Government strong + S sustained<a cla
 <li>SD rejection of any housing-subsidy package → intra-coalition block</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1">Scenario 2 — "S Campaign Traction" (A2 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-sustained">Government weak + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-sustained"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1">Scenario 2 — "S Campaign Traction" (A2 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-weak--s-sustained">Government weak + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-sustained"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.35 (MOST LIKELY)</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Ministerial responses are procedural and lack concrete new commitments. Larsson defers Pay Transparency Directive on "complexity" grounds. Svantesson defends 3:12 rules. Carlson cites "market conditions." The government misses the June 7 EU deadline. S operationalises the documented failures into summer campaign material, coordinating with LO and Byggnads. Media coverage frames accountability responses as inadequate.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: The interpellation wave becomes the <strong>spine of S's election campaign narrative</strong>. Each weekly polling release shows marginal S gains. Gender gap voters shift slightly. Carlson becomes a liability KD cannot remove without acknowledging failure.</p>
@@ -1282,8 +1282,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-sustained">Government weak + S sustained<a class="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Why most likely</strong>: Based on (1) historical government responsiveness to interpellations being low; (2) coalition tensions on directive implementation; (3) S's demonstrated coordination capacity; (4) EU deadline's external timing.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2">Scenario 3 — "Fragmentation" (A2 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-dissipated">Government weak + S dissipated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-dissipated"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2">Scenario 3 — "Fragmentation" (A2 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-weak--s-dissipated">Government weak + S dissipated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-dissipated"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.25</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Ministerial responses are weak as in S2, but S fails to sustain coordinated campaign pressure. Summer recess, competing intra-party priorities, or a leadership communication failure dissipate momentum. The interpellation wave peaks on May 5 and fades into ordinary political noise. Media moves to other topics.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: The accountability material is <strong>generated but not exploited</strong>. The government escapes the narrative consequences of its policy failures through opposition inefficiency.</p>
@@ -1297,8 +1297,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-dissipated">Government weak + S dissipated<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Why not likely</strong>: S has demonstrated coordination in the April 14–17 filings; fragmentation would be inconsistent with the observed pattern. However, summer recess is a genuine risk factor.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2">Scenario 4 — "Coalition Rupture" (A1 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally">Government strong + S dissipated but coalition fractures internally<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2">Scenario 4 — "Coalition Rupture" (A1 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally">Government strong + S dissipated but coalition fractures internally<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.10 (TAIL RISK)</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Aggressive government response to interpellations (announcing concessions) triggers coalition conflict. SD rejects kvinnojour emergency funding as "welfare expansion." KD rejects EU directive implementation as "Brussels overreach." L insists on firmer gender-equality action. The government becomes visibly divided on multiple axes. S's campaign becomes secondary to coalition drama.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: Government paralysis triggers <strong>confidence crisis</strong>. Possible motion of no confidence if numbers align. Small probability of early election or government reshuffle.</p>
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally">G
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Why low probability</strong>: Coalition has held together through more stressful periods (2023 budget); no trigger event as major as Election 2022 counter-trigger; SD has structural reasons to remain (policy gains vs opposition).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Scenario</th><th>Short name</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Gov strong + S sustained</td><td>Neutralisation</td><td align="center">0.20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Gov weak + S sustained</td><td><strong>S Traction</strong> ⭐</td><td align="center"><strong>0.35</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Gov weak + S dissipated</td><td>Fragmentation</td><td align="center">0.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Gov strong + S dissipated → coalition rupture</td><td>Coalition Rupture</td><td align="center">0.10</td></tr><tr><td>—</td><td>Residual / unmodelled</td><td>—</td><td align="center">0.10</td></tr><tr><td></td><td><strong>Sum</strong></td><td></td><td align="center"><strong>1.00</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-indicators-matrix">Decision Indicators Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-indicators-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-indicators-matrix">Decision Indicators Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-indicators-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>A single indicator grid for rapid scenario discrimination by mid-May 2026:</p>
 
 
@@ -1425,14 +1425,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-indicators-matrix">Decision Indicators Matrix<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator (status by 2026-05-15)</th><th align="center">S1 Neutralise</th><th align="center">S2 Traction</th><th align="center">S3 Fragmentation</th><th align="center">S4 Rupture</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Any new major government proposition on gender equality</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>S press activity weekly post-debate</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition joint public statements</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td></tr><tr><td>Novus polling shift ≥1.5pp to S</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>SD public criticism of coalition partners</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission informal signal on Sweden</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">Mixed</td><td align="center">Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Kvinnojour emergency funding announcement</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓ (then blocked)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-judgement">Analytic Judgement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-judgement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-judgement">Analytic Judgement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-judgement"></a></h3>
 <p>The <strong>modal expectation</strong> is S2 "S Traction" at P=0.35, with S3 "Fragmentation" as the most likely alternative at P=0.25. The combined probability of S2 + S3 (weak government response) is <strong>0.60</strong> — the base case is that the government response will be procedural and not neutralising, driven by coalition-internal constraints on issuing concessions.</p>
 <p>The <strong>upside scenario for the government</strong> (S1, P=0.20) requires active coordination between Larsson, Svantesson, Carlson, and SD leadership. This is achievable but not automatic.</p>
 <p>The <strong>tail risk</strong> (S4, P=0.10) is low-probability but high-impact — analysts should monitor SD public criticism as the primary leading indicator.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-reflection">Red Team Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-reflection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-reflection">Red Team Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-reflection"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Could we be over-weighting S2?</em> The coordination pattern is clear, but it is a single observation (one dual-filing). A counter-case would require S to show similar coordination in ≥2 other waves this session. So far, only this wave shows it at such density. Weakening S2 slightly (from 0.40 to 0.35) and redistributing to S3 (0.20 → 0.25) accounts for this.</p>
 <p><em>Could we be under-weighting S4?</em> Coalition tensions have been consistently present but have not produced rupture. P=0.10 is appropriate unless specific trigger events emerge.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-next-update-triggers">Next-Update Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-update-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-update-triggers">Next-Update Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-update-triggers"></a></h3>
 <p>This scenario set should be <strong>re-evaluated</strong> when any of the following occur:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>First ministerial response (April 21 for HD10429, HD10430)</li>
@@ -1448,9 +1448,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-update-triggers">Next-Update Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <strong>Peer-review</strong>: See <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> Red Team for independent challenge
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — scenarios are probabilistic and depend on decision-maker choices not yet made</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Framework</strong>: Likelihood × Impact (1–5 scale)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (L)</th><th>Impact (I)</th><th>Score (L×I)</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R001</td><td>Sweden formally breaches EU Pay Transparency Directive deadline — infringement proceedings</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td><strong>20</strong></td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>R002</td><td>More women's shelters close before government responds to HD10438 — direct harm to DV victims</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td><strong>20</strong></td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>R003</td><td>Foreign minister fails to address Bernadotte demands by April 30 — diplomatic credibility gap</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R004</td><td>Andreas Carlson unable to arrest housing construction decline — election liability crystallizes</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R005</td><td>Tax legitimacy crisis deepens without reform — erosion of civic trust</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R006</td><td>Hospital infrastructure investment backlog reaches crisis point — patient safety risk</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R007</td><td>S coordination pattern signals broader pre-election campaign — government response coordination fails</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>R008</td><td>SD mosque scrutiny creates religious freedom chilling effect</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>R009</td><td>Freedom of expression debate on prop 2025/26:133 escalates</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>R010</td><td>Withdrawn interpellation (HD10436/space) signals unresolved industry concerns</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>4</strong></td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard">Ministerial Accountability Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard">Ministerial Accountability Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1615,21 +1615,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard">Ministerial Accountability Scor
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Minister</th><th>Party</th><th>Interpellations (Active)</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Accountability Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson</strong></td><td>KD (Infrastruktur/Bostadsminister)</td><td>6+</td><td>Medium (April 30)</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL — Most-targeted minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson</strong></td><td>L (Jämställdhetsminister)</td><td>2 new (HD10437, HD10438)</td><td>Near (May 5)</td><td>🔴 HIGH — Dual coordinated attack</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td>M (Utrikesminister)</td><td>1 urgent (HD10435)</td><td>URGENT (April 30)</td><td>🔴 HIGH — Diplomatic dimension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong></td><td>M (Finansminister)</td><td>1+ (HD10433)</td><td>Near (April 29)</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabet Lann</strong></td><td>KD (Sjukvårdsminister)</td><td>1 (HD10432)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Benjamin Dousa</strong></td><td>M (Bistånds-/utrikeshandelsminister)</td><td>1 (HD10431)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jakob Forssmed</strong></td><td>KD (Socialminister)</td><td>1 (HD10430)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong></td><td>M (Justitieminister)</td><td>1 (HD10429)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators">Forward Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5">Immediate (0–14 days, before May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators">Forward Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5">Immediate (0–14 days, before May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Response to frs 2025/26:435 (Bernadotte) by April 30 — diplomatic/historical justice test</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Response to frs 2025/26:434 (Stockholm housing) by April 30 — Carlson accountability</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Response to frs 2025/26:433 (tax reform) by April 29 — Svantesson legitimacy</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Announcement of HD10437/HD10438 announced in chamber April 21 (tomorrow)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-medium-term-26-weeks">Medium-term (2–6 weeks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-term-26-weeks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-medium-term-26-weeks">Medium-term (2–6 weeks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-term-26-weeks"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> EU Commission reaction to Sweden's failure on Pay Transparency Directive</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Potential vote of no confidence against targeted minister if interpellation debate reveals gaps</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> S campaign integration of interpellation themes into election 2026 messaging</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-risk-context">Economic Risk Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-risk-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-risk-context">Economic Risk Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-risk-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-risk-context">Economic Risk Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th><th>Direction</th><th>Risk Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden unemployment (2025)</td><td>8.694%</td><td>↑ Rising</td><td>Labor market stress supports HD10422/HD10421 criticism</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden GDP growth (2024)</td><td>0.82%</td><td>↓ Low</td><td>Economic weakness fuels tax reform urgency (HD10433)</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden housing starts (Stockholm 2026)</td><td>~11,091</td><td>↓ -900</td><td>Confirms HD10434 data — Carlson's failure quantified</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden inflation (2024)</td><td>2.836%</td><td>↓ Cooling</td><td>Cost of living stabilizing but structural issues remain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government">Risk Treatment Options (for Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government">Risk Treatment Options (for Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government">Risk Treatment Options (for Go
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Mitigate</th><th>Transfer</th><th>Avoid</th><th>Accept</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R001 EU directive</td><td>Announce interim measures; introduce emergency legislation</td><td>Not transferable (Sweden is obligated party)</td><td>Would require EU derogation; not available</td><td>Ministerial choice with ~6 months of S narrative exploitation</td></tr><tr><td>R002 Shelters</td><td>Emergency funding package (SEK 50–150m); <em>länsstyrelser</em> administered</td><td>Partial transfer to <em>regioner</em></td><td>Not politically feasible</td><td>Ministerial choice with severe reputational cost</td></tr><tr><td>R003 Bernadotte</td><td>Narrow historical acknowledgement statement</td><td>—</td><td>Would require refusing to respond (not allowed)</td><td>Low-cost if framed carefully</td></tr><tr><td>R004 Carlson housing</td><td>Construction-loan guarantee expansion; PBL revision</td><td>To Boverket / regional planners</td><td>Not feasible given data exposure</td><td>High political cost</td></tr><tr><td>R005 Tax</td><td>Targeted review announcement (e.g., 3:12 committee)</td><td>—</td><td>Defensible but exposes ideology</td><td>Moderate political cost</td></tr><tr><td>R006 Hospitals</td><td>State co-investment mechanism</td><td>To regions (current)</td><td>—</td><td>Structural; hard to neutralise in short term</td></tr><tr><td>R007 Coordination signal</td><td>Coalition strategic communications</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Requires active coalition coherence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-risk-indicators-kris">Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk-indicators-kris"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-risk-indicators-kris">Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk-indicators-kris"></a></h3>
 <p>Leading indicators to monitor between now and the summer recess:</p>
 
 
@@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-risk-indicators-kris">Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KRI</th><th>Trigger threshold</th><th>Monitored via</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KRI-1: Novus S-polling ≥32%</td><td>Crossed</td><td>Novus, Sifo, Demoskop weekly</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-2: L-polling below 4% threshold</td><td>L &#x3C;4.0% sustained 3 weeks</td><td>Polling aggregators</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-3: EU Commission letter on Sweden transposition</td><td>Any correspondence</td><td>Commission DG EMPL releases</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-4: Additional kvinnojour closures announced</td><td>Any new closure in media</td><td>Civil-society monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-5: Carlson public approval</td><td>Below 30% sustained 4 weeks</td><td>Demoskop ministerial ratings</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-6: SD public criticism of coalition partners</td><td>Any Åkesson / Jomshof public statement</td><td>Social media + press</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-7: Coalition internal-meeting cadence</td><td>Fewer than weekly</td><td>Regeringskansliet kalender</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-8: S motion of no confidence discussion</td><td>Any credible leak</td><td>Parliamentary journalists</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-escalation-triggers">Escalation Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-escalation-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-escalation-triggers">Escalation Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-escalation-triggers"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier 1 (government must respond within 24h)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>EU Commission formal notice on Pay Transparency Directive</li>
@@ -1801,14 +1801,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-escalation-triggers">Escalation Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>Trade union public pressure</li>
 <li>Opposition committee-hearing requests</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register-evolution">Risk Register Evolution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-evolution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register-evolution">Risk Register Evolution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-evolution"></a></h3>
 <p>This risk register replaces the previous interpellation-wave register (2026-04-13) and is the active register until the next wave analysis. Key changes:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>R001 elevated from score 15 (previous) to 20 (this update) following full-text analysis of HD10437</li>
 <li>R004 Carlson elevated from score 12 to 16 following 6th-interpellation saturation signal</li>
 <li>R010 (withdrawn-space) added as new low-severity register entry for tracking</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-residual-risk-assessment">Residual Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-residual-risk-assessment">Residual Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Even with optimal government risk-treatment, residual risks remain:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10437: Transposition after June 7 is still transposition failure; residual political cost ≥3/5 severity</li>
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-residual-risk-assessment">Residual Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>HD10434: Even with a construction package, 2026 numbers are already set; residual ≥3/5</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Overall residual risk posture</strong>: 🟧 ELEVATED. The interpellation wave has raised the session risk baseline and will not fully dissipate even with strong government responses.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain">Risk Ownership and Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain">Risk Ownership and Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain">Risk Ownership and Accountab
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Primary owner</th><th>Secondary owner</th><th>Executive accountability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R001 EU directive</td><td>Larsson (L)</td><td>Strömmer (M)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R002 Shelters</td><td>Larsson (L)</td><td>Forssmed (KD)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R003 Bernadotte</td><td>Malmer Stenergard (M)</td><td>—</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R004 Housing</td><td>Carlson (KD)</td><td>Svantesson (M)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R005 Tax</td><td>Svantesson (M)</td><td>Carlson (KD)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R006 Hospitals</td><td>Lann (KD)</td><td>Svantesson (M)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R007 Coordination</td><td>Regeringskansliet strategic communications</td><td>All ministers</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-review-cadence">Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-review-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-review-cadence">Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-review-cadence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Daily monitoring of KRIs during April 29 – May 5 window</li>
 <li>Weekly review during May 6 – June 7</li>
@@ -1879,11 +1879,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-review-cadence">Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Quarterly review until Election 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Focus</strong>: Parliamentary Accountability — April 14–17 Wave</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix">Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public">1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General Public)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix">Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public">1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General Public)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1954,7 +1954,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public">1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Safety net infrastructure intact — question rights formally documented</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438 — parlamentarisk fråga ställd</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>Public accountability</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Formal democratic channel functioning — 438 interpellations filed in rm 2025/26</td><td>Total interpellation count, MCP data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Democratic health</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Women's shelters closing nationwide — direct safety risk</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438 — "många kvinnojourer runt om i landet läggs ned"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Tax system unfair perception — labor taxed heavily vs capital</td><td>frs 2025/26:433 HD10433 — "avsevärt lägre skatt än vanliga löntagare"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Housing access deteriorating — 900 fewer Stockholm homes planned in 2026</td><td>frs 2025/26:434 HD10434 — Länsstyrelsen Stockholm data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Pay gap closure possible via EU directive — if government acts</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — EU directive mechanism exists</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Aging hospital infrastructure creating care gaps — 1960s buildings</td><td>frs 2025/26:432 HD10432 — hospital investment crisis</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l">2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l">2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l">2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD,
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Formal responses can demonstrate competence if handled well</td><td>Response deadlines documented: SISVA April 29–May 5</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+4/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>HD10436 withdrawn — suggests space industry issue resolved bilaterally</td><td>frs 2025/26:436 status: "Återtagen"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive implementation proposal WITHDRAWN by government</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — government withdrew proposal</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Andreas Carlson (KD) is parliament's most-targeted minister — 6+ interpellations on infrastructure</td><td>HD10434, HD10428, HD10425, HD10424, HD10418, HD10417</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Nina Larsson (L) simultaneously targeted on two gender equality failures</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 + frs 2025/26:438 same day</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Moderate responses can reframe interpellations as routine scrutiny</td><td>Standard parliamentary process</td><td>[LOW] 🟥</td><td>+3/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Response to HD10435 (Bernadotte) requires diplomatic precision vs Israel</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 deadline April 30, 2026</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent">3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C dissent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent">3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C dissent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent">3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>S filed 7 of 10 recent interpellations — disciplined pre-election accountability campaign</td><td>Analysis of interpellation filers, MCP data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+8/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>S coordinated dual filing on April 17 targeting same minister on related topics</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 + frs 2025/26:438 filed same day</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>EU compliance failure is documented — government cannot easily rebut factual record</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 — "Sverige kommer inte att lyckas implementera direktivet i tid"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Bernadotte interpellation (El-Haj, independent) could backfire if perceived as partisan</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 — El-Haj is independent, not party-affiliated</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-3/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Five interpellations with SISVA April 29–May 5 create accountability window before spring recess</td><td>Response deadlines clustered</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If ministers respond effectively, parliamentary attention may shift away</td><td>Risk of deflection in responses</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-4/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv">4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv">4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2143,7 +2143,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv">4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Tax certainty debate may clarify investment environment</td><td>frs 2025/26:433 HD10433</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+4/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Housing construction decline (-900 units in Stockholm 2026) affects workforce planning</td><td>frs 2025/26:434 HD10434 — Länsstyrelsen data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive delay creates legal uncertainty for employers</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — compliance uncertainty</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Space industry interpellation withdrawn — signals government-industry dialogue active</td><td>frs 2025/26:436 withdrawn</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Sweden unemployment at 8.694% (2025, World Bank) — rising trend hurts productivity</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)<a c
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Women's shelters (idéburna organisationer) formally defended in parliament</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>LGBTQ+ rights internationally defended via C's interpellation</td><td>frs 2025/26:431 HD10431</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Government failures to fund women's shelters threaten sector viability</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 — "stora konsekvenser för möjligheten att lämna en våldsam relation"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Mosque scrutiny (HD10430) may create chilling effect on religious organizations</td><td>frs 2025/26:430 HD10430 — SD mosque targeting</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-5/10</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Parliamentary pressure may trigger emergency government action on shelter funding</td><td>Accountability mechanism working</td><td>[LOW] 🟥</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Hospital infrastructure crisis without state guarantee endangers community care access</td><td>frs 2025/26:432 HD10432</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. INTERNATIONAL / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. INTERNATIONAL / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. INTERNATIONAL / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Sweden still formally committed to EU directive frameworks</td><td>Multiple EU directives referenced</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+4/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Sweden will MISS EU Pay Transparency Directive deadline — constitutional obligations</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — "Sverige kommer inte att lyckas implementera direktivet i tid"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Swedish foreign policy on Israel/Palestine under parliamentary pressure</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 HD10435 — Bernadotte/Malmer Stenergard</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Bernadotte interpellation creates opportunity for Sweden to lead on historical justice</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 — three explicit demands for apology/compensation</td><td>[LOW] 🟥</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Swedish foreign minister must balance Israel relations with LGBTQ/human rights portfolio</td><td>frs 2025/26:431 + frs 2025/26:435 combined</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2316,7 +2316,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Constitutional freedom of expression tradition formally invoked</td><td>frs 2025/26:429 HD10429 — "Sverige har en stolt och i många avseenden unik tradition"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Proposition 2025/26:133 (unnamed in interpellation) may compromise press freedom — SD challenge</td><td>frs 2025/26:429 HD10429</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>El-Haj interpellation on Bernadotte cites failure to hold Israeli murderers accountable — 78 years unresolved</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 HD10435 — "Ingen dömdes någonsin"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Parliamentary scrutiny of executive compliance with EU law creates constitutional accountability</td><td>EU directive obligation</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Tax system inequality documented in interpellation creates legitimacy crisis risk</td><td>frs 2025/26:433 HD10433</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-5/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2372,14 +2372,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Bernadotte interpellation offers compelling historical narrative with contemporary resonance</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 HD10435 — "ett av de mest uppmärksammade politiska attentaten"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Women's shelter closures are highly media-ready story — human interest + policy failure</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+8/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive failure is a complex story — may require media simplification</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-3/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Six interpellations with deadlines in 9–15 days creates "countdown" media narrative</td><td>Response deadline analysis</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Mosque/freedom of expression interpellations (SD) may dominate coverage vs. substantive S issues</td><td>frs 2025/26:430 + frs 2025/26:429</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-5/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH overall (MCP live data, full text documents)<br>
 <strong>Threat Level</strong>: 🔴 HIGH — Multiple active accountability threats with near-term response deadlines</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview-threat-assessment">Overview Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview-threat-assessment">Overview Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase with 8 active interpellations across 8 ministers, 5 response deadlines clustering in the April 29 – May 5 window, and documented government policy failures that the opposition is systematically exploiting ahead of the 2026 general election.</p>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level: HIGH</strong> | Confidence: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437">Threat 1: EU Pay Transparency Directive Breach (frs 2025/26:437)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437">Threat 1: EU Pay Transparency Directive Breach (frs 2025/26:437)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Socialdemokraterna), Interpellation Sofia Amloh<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Sweden's government withdrew its implementation proposal for the EU Pay Transparency Directive. Sweden will miss the transposition deadline. This creates:</p>
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437">Threat 1
 <strong>Probability</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Government's own withdrawal of proposal is documented evidence<br>
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response due May 5, 2026; EU transposition deadline June 7, 2026 (48 days away as of analysis date)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438">Threat 2: Women's Shelter Closure Crisis (frs 2025/26:438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438">Threat 2: Women's Shelter Closure Crisis (frs 2025/26:438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Socialdemokraterna), Interpellation Sofia Amloh<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Women's shelters (kvinnojourer) closing nationwide due to funding crisis. Direct consequence: women cannot safely leave violent relationships. The interpellation documents this as an institutional failure of the government's anti-violence strategy.</p>
@@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438">Threat 2: Women
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Crisis ongoing; response deadline May 5, 2026</p>
 <p><strong>Connection to Threat 1</strong>: Both HD10437 and HD10438 target the same minister on the same day — this is a coordinated S parliamentary strategy, not coincidence. By doubling the pressure in one day, S forces Larsson to respond to both gender equality crises simultaneously.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435">Threat 3: Diplomatic Accountability — Bernadotte/Israel (frs 2025/26:435)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435">Threat 3: Diplomatic Accountability — Bernadotte/Israel (frs 2025/26:435)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: Independent MP Jamal El-Haj (formerly S)<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Utrikesminister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Three-part demand: (1) Swedish government to require Israel to accept responsibility for 1948 Bernadotte assassination; (2) formal public apology to Bernadotte family; (3) financial compensation. The interpellation explicitly links the 1948 murder to current Israeli death penalty legislation and its application against Palestinians.</p>
@@ -2410,7 +2410,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435">T
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response deadline April 30, 2026 — URGENT (10 days remaining)<br>
 <strong>Complexity</strong>: El-Haj is independent (-) after leaving S over Israel/Palestine disagreements. This creates an unusual dynamic where a former S member makes the most politically charged foreign policy intervention of the session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434">Threat 4: Infrastructure Minister Accountability Saturation (frs 2025/26:434)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434">Threat 4: Infrastructure Minister Accountability Saturation (frs 2025/26:434)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Leif Nysmed)<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Andreas Carlson (KD, Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Stockholm housing construction declining by ~900 units vs 2025 (11,091 vs ~12,000 planned starts). This is Carlson's 6th+ interpellation this session. Each new interpellation compounds reputational damage and narrows his room to claim policy success.</p>
@@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526
 <strong>Probability</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Statistics confirmed by Länsstyrelsen Stockholm<br>
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response deadline April 29, 2026 — 9 days</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433">Threat 5: Government Tax Reform Resistance (frs 2025/26:433)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433">Threat 5: Government Tax Reform Resistance (frs 2025/26:433)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Ida Ekeroth Clausson)<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: The interpellation exposes the fundamental paradox of Sweden's tax system: highest density of billionaires per capita globally while labor income is taxed heavily. Rising inequality, capital-labor tax disparity, and social contract legitimacy questioned.</p>
@@ -2426,7 +2426,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433">Threat 5: Go
 <strong>Probability</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Structural condition documented by interpellation<br>
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response deadline April 29, 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Confidence Level</th><th>Evidence Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Threat 1 (EU directive)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Government's own withdrawal of proposal (documented in frs 2025/26:437)</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 2 (women's shelters)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>"Faktum" stated in frs 2025/26:438 full text</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 3 (Bernadotte)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Full text frs 2025/26:435, response deadline documented</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 4 (housing)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Länsstyrelsen Stockholm quantified data in frs 2025/26:434</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 5 (tax reform)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Systemic analysis in frs 2025/26:433 full text</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-actor-profiling">Threat Actor Profiling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-actor-profiling"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor">TA-1: Social Democrats (S) — Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-actor-profiling">Threat Actor Profiling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-actor-profiling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor">TA-1: Social Democrats (S) — Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Institutional opposition party; tier-1 threat actor
 <strong>Capability</strong>: High — 107 MPs, professional party apparatus, coordinated whip system, union affiliations (LO, TCO), media reach
 <strong>Intent</strong>: HIGH — explicit pre-Election 2026 accountability campaign
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor">TA-1: Social Democrats
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Description</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Initial access (agenda-setting)</td><td>Interpellation filing creates documentary record</td><td>7 of 10 wave interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>Persistence</td><td>Multiple interpellations same minister (Carlson saturation)</td><td>6+ Carlson interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>Privilege escalation</td><td>Dual-filing same day to force compound response</td><td>HD10437+HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>Defence evasion</td><td>Use of government-source data (Länsstyrelsen, EU directive text) to deny minister rhetorical escape</td><td>HD10437, HD10434</td></tr><tr><td>Lateral movement</td><td>Thematic coordination across policy domains (gender→housing→tax)</td><td>Wave structure</td></tr><tr><td>Collection</td><td>Creating documentary record of ministerial answers for campaign use</td><td>Standard practice</td></tr><tr><td>Command &#x26; control</td><td>Party-whip coordination of filing timing</td><td>Dual-filing on April 17</td></tr><tr><td>Exfiltration</td><td>Operationalising into election-campaign messaging</td><td>Expected post-May 5</td></tr><tr><td>Impact</td><td>Electoral gain through accumulated narrative</td><td>To be assessed post-September 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor">TA-2: Sweden Democrats (SD) — Secondary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor">TA-2: Sweden Democrats (SD) — Secondary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Coalition external supply party; tier-2 threat actor (asymmetric)
 <strong>Capability</strong>: Medium–High (72 MPs, coalition arrangement-based leverage)
 <strong>Intent</strong>: MEDIUM — agenda-setting and brand-signalling more than direct government-toppling
@@ -2537,18 +2537,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor">TA-2: Sweden Democr
 <li><strong>Balanced attack</strong> (HD10429 + HD10430 — both liberty expansion and restriction depending on subject)</li>
 <li><strong>Agenda visibility maintenance</strong> — keeping religious-extremism issues in public view</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor">TA-3: Jamal El-Haj (Independent) — Wildcard Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor">TA-3: Jamal El-Haj (Independent) — Wildcard Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Individual independent MP; tier-2 threat actor (institutional weight limited; asymmetric impact potential high)
 <strong>Capability</strong>: Low in raw numbers; high in diaspora-community mobilisation
 <strong>Intent</strong>: HIGH on Israel/Palestine accountability
 <strong>Opportunity</strong>: HIGH — 10-day response window, media-ready narrative</p>
 <p><strong>TTPs</strong>: Single-issue concentrated pressure; using independent platform to make demands party-affiliated MPs cannot</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor">TA-4: Centerpartiet (C) — Tier-3 Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor">TA-4: Centerpartiet (C) — Tier-3 Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: External supply party; tier-3
 <strong>Capability</strong>: 24 MPs; moderate
 <strong>Intent</strong>: Brand-differentiation more than government-opposition
 <strong>TTPs</strong>: Selective issue-championing (HD10431 LGBTQI+)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-landscape-matrix">Threat Landscape Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-landscape-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-landscape-matrix">Threat Landscape Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-landscape-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>        High Impact
              |
      TA-1 (S)● ───── ●TA-3 (El-Haj)
@@ -2561,17 +2561,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-landscape-matrix">Threat Landscape Matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
              └──────────────────→
           Low Intent     High Intent
 </code></pre>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-compound-effects">Threat Compound Effects<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-compound-effects"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-compound-effects">Threat Compound Effects<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-compound-effects"></a></h3>
 <p>Individual threats are analytically meaningful; <strong>compound effects</strong> may be greater than the sum:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438">Compound Effect 1: Dual-gender attack (HD10437 + HD10438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438">Compound Effect 1: Dual-gender attack (HD10437 + HD10438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438"></a></h4>
 <p>Same day, same MP, same minister. Impact: forces Larsson to formulate a response that addresses both EU compliance <em>and</em> service-delivery failure — under constrained time. Impact multiplier: ~1.6x single-interpellation pressure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active">Compound Effect 2: Carlson saturation (HD10434 + 5 other active)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active">Compound Effect 2: Carlson saturation (HD10434 + 5 other active)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active"></a></h4>
 <p>Cumulative policy-area coverage. Impact: no "safe" portfolio retreat. Impact multiplier: ~2x single-interpellation pressure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters">Compound Effect 3: Fiscal-social attack (HD10433 tax + HD10437 gender + HD10432 hospitals + HD10438 shelters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters">Compound Effect 3: Fiscal-social attack (HD10433 tax + HD10437 gender + HD10432 hospitals + HD10438 shelters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters"></a></h4>
 <p>Constructs a unified "government failing working families" narrative. Impact multiplier: ~1.3x — dilutes focus but reinforces frame.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty">Compound Effect 4: Foreign-policy stress (HD10435 + HD10426 Israel death penalty)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty">Compound Effect 4: Foreign-policy stress (HD10435 + HD10426 Israel death penalty)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty"></a></h4>
 <p>Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — keeps foreign-policy-accountability in news.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities">Government Counter-Threat Capabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities">Government Counter-Threat Capabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities">Government Counter-Threat Cap
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Capability</th><th>Current strength</th><th align="center">Deployment likelihood</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ministerial rhetorical skill</td><td>HIGH (Svantesson, Strömmer, Malmer Stenergard)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Policy announcement / concession</td><td>MEDIUM (coalition constraints)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition coordination</td><td>MEDIUM–HIGH (2+ years operation)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Counter-narrative deployment</td><td>MEDIUM (government PR)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative agenda control</td><td>HIGH (parliamentary majority)</td><td align="center">N/A for interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>EU-level coordination</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (on HD10437)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Government has significant counter-threat capabilities but is constrained by coalition internal dynamics. The most likely counter-move is ministerial rhetorical skill + targeted concessions (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version">Threat Intelligence Indicators (IoCs) — Political-Domain Version<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version">Threat Intelligence Indicators (IoCs) — Political-Domain Version<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2661,11 +2661,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version">Threat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator type</th><th>Examples</th><th align="center">Watch priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Filing pattern IoC</strong></td><td>Repeated same-MP same-day same-minister filings</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Language IoC</strong></td><td>Phrase patterns in ministerial responses ("pågående arbete" = holding pattern)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Calendar IoC</strong></td><td>Response-deadline clustering</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media IoC</strong></td><td>Coordinated op-ed timing with LO/TCO amplification</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polling IoC</strong></td><td>≥1.5pp shift after debate cycle</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition IoC</strong></td><td>Public statements by one coalition partner about another</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Withdrawal IoC</strong></td><td>Interpellation withdrawals (information-value signal)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-horizon">Threat Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-horizon">Threat Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-horizon"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current horizon (0–14 days)</strong>: All 10 interpellations in active-response phase. Threat level peaks May 5.</p>
 <p><strong>Medium horizon (14–90 days)</strong>: EU Commission June 7 deadline. Summer recess (typically late June). Polling stabilisation. Government policy announcements.</p>
 <p><strong>Long horizon (90+ days)</strong>: Election 2026 campaign formal launch (August 2026). Interpellation narrative absorbed into campaign messaging. Post-election government formation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Internal S communications</strong>: Coordination structure is inferred, not observed</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition backchannel discussions</strong>: Government coalition internal meetings not observed</li>
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>EU Commission informal communications</strong>: Not directly observable</li>
 <li><strong>Union-campaign coordination</strong>: LO/TCO strategic planning not transparent</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment">Analyst Confidence in Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment">Analyst Confidence in Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Threat identification: HIGH 🟩 (primary-source interpellation text available for tier-1 threats)</li>
 <li>Threat actor capability: HIGH 🟩</li>
@@ -2684,19 +2684,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment">Analyst Confidence in Threat
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10429">HD10429<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10429"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10429 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:429
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-07 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 5.5/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Rashid Farivar (SD) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Justitieminister Gunnar Strömmer (M)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-21</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Rashid Farivar (SD) interpellates Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) on freedom-of-expression protections in relation to government proposition <strong>2025/26:133</strong>. The interpellation opens with an explicit invocation of Sweden's constitutional heritage: <em>"Sverige har en stolt och i många avseenden unik tradition av att värna det fria ordet. Redan 1766 fick vi världens första grundlagsskyddade tryckfrihet"</em> — Sweden's 1766 <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> is the oldest press-freedom constitutional act in the world. The rhetorical frame positions SD as the guardian of this tradition against alleged government overreach.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vad avser ministern att göra för att säkerställa att propositionen 2025/26:133 inte leder till en försvagning av tryck- och yttrandefriheten i Sverige?"
 (<em>"What does the minister intend to do to ensure that proposition 2025/26:133 does not lead to a weakening of press and freedom of expression in Sweden?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is an <strong>inverted-expected interpellation</strong>. SD is typically positioned as favouring stronger law-enforcement/speech-limitation measures. Here, SD is interpellating on <strong>press-freedom</strong> grounds — positioning themselves as <strong>defenders of expression rights</strong> against their own coalition's proposition. This is tactically sophisticated:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Rebuts critiques that SD is anti-free-speech</li>
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<
 <li>Must defend prop 2025/26:133 personally</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Coalition-dynamic signal</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Two SD interpellations in one week (HD10429 + HD10430) — one on expression rights against M, one on religious extremism against KD. This is <strong>balanced pressure</strong> across the coalition: SD is simultaneously demanding more liberty (HD10429) and more restriction (HD10430), depending on subject. The pattern reinforces SD's brand as the <strong>"agenda-setter"</strong> within the coalition without appearing ideologically contradictory.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-constitutional-law-dimension">Constitutional-Law Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-law-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-constitutional-law-dimension">Constitutional-Law Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-law-dimension"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩] Sweden's press-freedom regime has unique constitutional features:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (TF) 1766/1949 — world's oldest</li>
@@ -2732,11 +2732,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-constitutional-law-dimension">Constitutional-Law Dimension<a class=""
 <li><strong>Censurförbud</strong> (no pre-publication review) — near-absolute</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Any proposition touching these protections faces constitutional-review scrutiny (Lagrådet). SD's invocation of this heritage positions them rhetorically with a coalition that includes historic press-freedom defenders.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Strömmer, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Strömmer, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.55): Strömmer defends prop 2025/26:133 as compatible with TF/YGL. Cites Lagrådet review. Emphasises narrow scope. Deflects broader free-speech concerns to other venues.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): Strömmer acknowledges some SD concerns, commits to refinements in committee-stage (<em>utskottsbehandling</em>), offers language clarifications. This would be a small concession satisfying SD optics.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.15): Strömmer withdraws proposition elements or accepts amendments. Would be a notable defeat but reduces coalition friction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2773,7 +2773,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor">Intelligence Indicators to Monito
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet comments on prop 2025/26:133</td><td>Before committee stage</td><td>Constitutional signal</td></tr><tr><td>Journalist-union (Journalistförbundet) reaction</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Civil-society response</td></tr><tr><td>SD voting alignment in committee</td><td>Committee report</td><td>Coalition-integrity test</td></tr><tr><td>Strömmer's rhetoric ("absolute free speech" vs "balanced")</td><td>April 21 debate</td><td>Framing indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Åkesson public comments</td><td>48 hrs post-debate</td><td>Party-leader signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws">Comparative Framework: Foreign-Influence Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws">Comparative Framework: Foreign-Influence Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2811,29 +2811,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws">Comparative Framework:
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Law</th><th>Speech impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Prop 2025/26:133 (pending)</td><td>Contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US</strong></td><td>FARA 1938</td><td>Disclosure-based</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Australia</strong></td><td>Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme 2018</td><td>Disclosure; contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>National Security Act 2023</td><td>Broader; contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz 2017</td><td>Platform-focused</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sweden's historical position has been more liberal than most peers — any perceived erosion is politically charged.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟨 MODERATE-LOW — Free-speech is high-salience for elite but medium for general voter
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟢 LOW-MEDIUM — Strömmer can defend proposition on security grounds; SD won't break coalition
 <strong>SD campaign-utility rating</strong>: 6.0/10 — Brand-positioning more than electoral-swing value</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Prop 2025/26:133 (not in this batch; the target document)</li>
 <li>HD10430 — Mosque hate-speech (Jomshof/SD) — companion interpellation showing balanced SD pressure</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10430">HD10430<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10430"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10430-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10430 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:430
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-07 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 5.2/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Richard Jomshof (SD) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Socialminister Jakob Forssmed (KD)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-21</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Richard Jomshof — Chair of the <em>Justitieutskottet</em> (Justice Committee) and a long-standing SD senior MP — interpellates Social Affairs Minister Jakob Forssmed (KD) on mosques that allegedly spread hate and threats. The interpellation references an <em>Expressen</em> exposé on a Sunni mosque in Kristianstad (Skåne) where an imam reportedly preached hate-incitement content. The interpellation presses the minister on government measures to prevent such institutions from operating.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vilka åtgärder avser ministern och regeringen att vidta för att säkerställa att moskéer och andra trossamfund som sprider hat och hot inte får fortsätta bedriva sin verksamhet?"
 (<em>"What measures do the minister and the government intend to take to ensure that mosques and other religious communities spreading hate and threats are not allowed to continue their operations?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is an <strong>intra-coalition pressure interpellation</strong>. SD and KD agree broadly on religious-extremism concerns, but diverge on the legal instrument and scope. Jomshof's interpellation is not designed to flip government policy — it is designed to <strong>keep religious-extremism visible</strong> in the run-up to Election 2026 and to signal SD's leadership on the issue to its voter base.</p>
 <p><strong>Actor profile: Richard Jomshof</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <li>By interpellating a KD minister (coalition partner), SD signals it is <strong>pressing government from the right</strong></li>
 <li>Creates headline opportunities for SD's campaign ("SD demands action against extremist mosques")</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk">Counter-Narrative and Civil-Society Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk">Counter-Narrative and Civil-Society Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk"></a></h3>
 <p>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧] The interpellation carries non-trivial risks:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Muslim community organisations may perceive collective stigmatisation</li>
@@ -2874,11 +2874,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk">Counter-Narrative and Civil
 <li>Precedent risk for non-Muslim religious communities</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Expected progressive response</strong>: C, V, MP will likely file opposing motions or interpellations emphasising due process and discrimination concerns.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Forssmed, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Forssmed, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.60): Forssmed cites existing legal instruments, ongoing <em>SST</em> reforms, and police-led prosecutions. Emphasises rule-of-law procedures. Avoids new commitments.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): Forssmed signals willingness to review specific SST funding criteria or announces study of best practices from European peers (France, Denmark).</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.10): Forssmed announces a new legal-framework review or a specific targeted mosque-oversight instrument — would require broader coalition sign-off.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2915,7 +2915,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SST communications post-debate</td><td>New guidelines announced</td><td>Government taking SD line</td></tr><tr><td>Prosecution of the specific Kristianstad imam</td><td>Actionable outcome</td><td>Substantive accountability check</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition counter-motions (V, C)</td><td>Within 14 days</td><td>Political polarisation signal</td></tr><tr><td>Muslim Council of Sweden statement</td><td>Any public reaction</td><td>Community response</td></tr><tr><td>Headline coverage in DN/SvD/Aftonbladet</td><td>Week of April 21</td><td>Media framing indicator</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches">Comparative Framework: European Approaches<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches">Comparative Framework: European Approaches<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2952,29 +2952,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches">Comparative Framework: Eur
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Approach</th><th>Outcomes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td><em>Loi Séparatisme</em> 2021 — mosque associations under oversight</td><td>50+ closures; legal challenges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>2016 imam-preaching ban</td><td>Legally effective; limited scope</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Austria</strong></td><td>2015 Islam law</td><td>Comprehensive; contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Case-by-case Verfassungsschutz</td><td>Varies by Land</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>SST funding + hate-speech prosecution</td><td>Narrow instrument</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-1">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-1">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — High for SD base; low for swing voters
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟢 LOW — Within SD-KD policy comfort zone
 <strong>SD campaign-utility rating</strong>: 6.5/10 — Amplifies SD brand without requiring government concession</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents-1">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-1">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10429 — Freedom of expression (SD's Farivar) — thematic pair</li>
 <li>SST annual report 2024 (contextual reference)</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10431">HD10431<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10431"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10431-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10431 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:431
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-14 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 6.0/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Anna Lasses (C) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Bistånds- och utrikeshandelsminister Benjamin Dousa (M)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-28</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Anna Lasses (C) presses Development Aid and Foreign Trade Minister Benjamin Dousa (M) on Sweden's international work for the human rights of LGBTQI+ people. The interpellation cites mounting global pressure on LGBTQI+ rights defenders and the tightening operating environment for HR organisations in authoritarian contexts. This is the <strong>only Centerpartiet (C) interpellation of the batch</strong> — and it is deliberately positioned to signal C's differentiation from government partners on human-rights doctrine.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Hur avser ministern att säkerställa att Sveriges internationella arbete för hbtqi-personers mänskliga rättigheter upprätthålls och fördjupas?"
 (<em>"How does the minister intend to ensure that Sweden's international work for the human rights of LGBTQI+ people is maintained and deepened?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This interpellation is <strong>strategic positioning rather than pure accountability</strong>. C is one of the Tidö-agreement's external supply partners (not a formal coalition member), and Lasses is using the interpellation instrument to:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Signal to progressive centrist voters that C retains a distinct liberal human-rights profile</li>
@@ -3005,14 +3005,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <li>Older socially-conservative voters (target: SD/KD pool)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>C's interpellation positions them for the first segment, tactically abandoning the second.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-accountability-dimension">Accountability Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-accountability-dimension">Accountability Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-dimension"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Will Dousa satisfy the interpellation?</strong> [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: Dousa is likely to reaffirm Sweden's historical commitment to LGBTQI+ rights in international aid. However, <em>how</em> he phrases this matters:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Strong answer → Dousa signals M's liberal values; strains SD relations</li>
 <li>Hedged answer → Gives C more attack material; may appear weak to progressives</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Expected framing</strong>: Dousa likely emphasises Sweden's overall human-rights framework (not LGBTQI+ specifically), cites ongoing Sida programmes, and avoids new commitments. This is the lowest-political-cost response.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers">Comparative Framework: Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers">Comparative Framework: Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3050,11 +3050,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers">Comparative Framework: Nordic Pee
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>LGBTQI+ aid doctrine 2025</th><th>Shift vs 2022</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Strong rhetorical; budget constrained</td><td>Narrowing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Strong rhetorical + budget</td><td>Stable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Moderate</td><td>Slight narrowing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Moderate; less explicit</td><td>Stable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Iceland</strong></td><td>Strong</td><td>Stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sweden's previous position as Nordic LGBTQI+-aid leader is slipping — the interpellation implicitly signals this.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28">Response-Strategy Forecast (Dousa, April 28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28">Response-Strategy Forecast (Dousa, April 28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.65): Affirmative answer citing Sweden's historical role, ongoing Sida funding, and human-rights framework. No new commitments. Limited specifics.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.25): Expanded answer referencing specific programmes (e.g. UN Equal Rights Coalition), with a tacit recognition that funding has been constrained. This would partially satisfy Lasses.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.10): Announcement of a new LGBTQI+-specific Sida funding initiative — would be a political win for C but creates SD tension.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3091,30 +3091,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Dousa speech framing</td><td>"LGBTQI+" explicit vs generic HR</td><td>C success metric</td></tr><tr><td>SD reaction (Åkesson, Jomshof)</td><td>Public comments post-debate</td><td>Coalition strain indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Sida 2026 budget allocations</td><td>Autumn 2026</td><td>Resource-level confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>C polling in urban areas</td><td>30–60 days</td><td>Campaign traction check</td></tr><tr><td>MP/V amplification</td><td>Next 14 days</td><td>Left-flank positioning</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-2">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-2">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟨 MODERATE — Low-20s voter priority; high symbolic weight
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟡 ELEVATED — Interpellation designed to stress coalition
 <strong>C campaign-utility rating</strong>: 7.0/10 for <em>identity positioning</em> (higher than raw electoral salience because it distinguishes C brand)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents-2">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-2">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10426 — Israel death penalty (Muranovic/S) — related HR pressure vector</li>
 <li>HD10435 — Bernadotte/Israel accountability (El-Haj) — thematic overlap</li>
 <li>Prior Sida annual reports (context references)</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10432">HD10432<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10432"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10432-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10432 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:432
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-15 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 6.5/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Robert Olesen (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Sjukvårdsminister Elisabet Lann (KD)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-05-05 (NEAR)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Robert Olesen (S) interpellates Health Minister Elisabet Lann (KD) on state guarantees for hospital-building investments. Sweden's healthcare infrastructure backbone is ageing rapidly: a substantial share of hospital buildings date from the 1960s–1970s and require either reconstruction, extension, or full replacement. The 21 <em>regioner</em> (regional authorities) carry primary financing responsibility, but rising construction costs and capital-market conditions have narrowed their borrowing capacity.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vilka åtgärder avser ministern att vidta för att staten ska kunna säkerställa nödvändiga investeringar i vårdbyggnader?"
 (<em>"What measures does the minister intend to take to ensure the state can secure necessary investments in healthcare buildings?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The interpellation operates at the <strong>fiscal-federalism</strong> pressure point in the Swedish welfare model — regions are constitutionally responsible for healthcare but fiscally constrained. By asking what the <strong>state</strong> will do, Olesen forces Lann into the politically charged territory of proposing either (a) direct state financing (expansion of central government responsibility, ideologically difficult for KD), or (b) explicit refusal (politically costly given hospital-closure fears).</p>
 <p><strong>Structural context</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3126,7 +3126,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Pattern analysis</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is Olesen's <strong>second healthcare-infrastructure interpellation</strong> targeting Lann, following HD10415 (<em>Statligt säkerställande av bra vård</em>). S is building a coordinated "state responsibility for healthcare" narrative across multiple questions, creating incremental pressure rather than one-off confrontation.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition tension vector</strong> [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: KD's traditional position favours expanded state role in healthcare delivery (Christian Democratic "care state" tradition), but the Tidö agreement has pushed the coalition toward <em>regionernas självstyre</em> (regional self-government) framing. Lann is caught between her party's historical instincts and the coalition's operational doctrine.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-quantitative-context">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quantitative-context">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-quantitative-context">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Hospital buildings built 1960–1980</td><td>~60% of stock</td><td>SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)</td></tr><tr><td>Regional investment gap (10-year)</td><td>SEK 60–100 bn</td><td>SKR 2024 estimates</td></tr><tr><td>Average region debt-to-revenue</td><td>~45%</td><td>Statskontoret 2024</td></tr><tr><td>Construction-cost inflation 2021–2025</td><td>+30%</td><td>SCB PPI</td></tr><tr><td>Annual new-hospital starts (Sweden)</td><td>~4–6 major projects</td><td>Regioner aggregated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-dimension">Comparative Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-dimension">Comparative Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-dimension"></a></h3>
 <p>Other Nordic peers structure hospital financing differently:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Norway</strong>: Central government owns hospital trusts (foretak) — direct state investment</li>
@@ -3172,11 +3172,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-dimension">Comparative Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Sweden</strong>: Pure regional financing; state grants ad-hoc</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The interpellation implicitly references that Sweden is <strong>out of step</strong> with the Nordic norm.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5">Response-Strategy Forecast (Lann, May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5">Response-Strategy Forecast (Lann, May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.55): Lann acknowledges the investment gap, cites ongoing state-investment grants for specific projects, and emphasises <em>"sound regional financial management"</em> as the primary lever. Avoids committing to systemic state guarantees.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): Lann signals a planning commission or review to examine capital-funding models. This would be a tactical concession aligning with KD's ideological comfort zone.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.15): Announcement of a specific state-guarantee instrument (like <em>Riksgälden</em>-backed regional bonds). This would be a significant fiscal-policy shift — would require Svantesson's endorsement.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3213,30 +3213,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lann response framing</td><td>"State guarantee" vs "regional responsibility"</td><td>Ideological positioning</td></tr><tr><td>SKR press reaction</td><td>Strong or muted</td><td>Sector coordination</td></tr><tr><td>V/MP follow-up motions</td><td>Next 14 days</td><td>Left-wing amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson statement on regional finances</td><td>Next 30 days</td><td>Cross-portfolio signal</td></tr><tr><td>2026 budget healthcare line</td><td>Autumn 2026</td><td>Budget-cycle test</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-3">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-3">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM-HIGH — Healthcare ranks top-3 voter concern consistently; specific hospital case studies mobilise regional voters
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — Structural issue predates Tidö; can be deflected to long-term planning
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 6.5/10 — Substantial issue, harder to operationalise into single headline; risk of "abstract policy debate"</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents-3">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-3">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10415 — <em>Statligt säkerställande av bra vård</em> (prior Olesen interpellation to Lann)</li>
 <li>frs 2024/25 healthcare-budget lines (prior motions)</li>
 <li>SKR "Ekonomirapporten" 2024 (context reference)</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10433">HD10433<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10433"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10433-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10433 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:433
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-15 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 7.8/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-29 (9 days remaining)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S) — a tax-committee specialist — presses Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) on the "legitimacy, efficiency and distributional profile" (<em>legitimitet, effektivitet och fördelningsprofil</em>) of the Swedish tax system. The interpellation frames a systemic paradox: Sweden taxes labour income at one of Europe's highest effective marginal rates while hosting <strong>one of the world's highest per-capita densities of billionaires</strong> (Credit Suisse/Forbes estimates place Sweden in the global top-3 per-capita, behind only Monaco and Switzerland).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Avser ministern att verka för en bred översyn av det svenska skattesystemet i syfte att öka dess legitimitet och effektivitet?"
 (<em>"Does the minister intend to work for a broad review of the Swedish tax system with the aim of increasing its legitimacy and efficiency?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The interpellation is an <strong>ideological accountability ambush</strong> rather than a narrow policy question. By asking Svantesson to endorse a "broad tax review," Ekeroth Clausson forces the minister into a binary choice:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Accept → signals that current tax doctrine is failing (politically damaging for M)</li>
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Option</th><th>Feasibility</th><th>Political cost</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Announce a commission/review</td><td>Possible</td><td>Low — standard government deflection</td></tr><tr><td>Defend 3:12 explicitly</td><td>Difficult</td><td>High — exposes structural inequality</td></tr><tr><td>Cite international tax competitiveness</td><td>Possible</td><td>Medium — S can cite IMF/OECD fairness research</td></tr><tr><td>Deflect to EU-level action</td><td>Possible</td><td>Medium — neutralizes but does not resolve</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Accountability dimension</strong>: Whatever Svantesson says, S will have a sound-bite. If she promises a review → S claims victory; if she rejects → S has campaign material.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy">Structural Data: Sweden Tax Legitimacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy">Structural Data: Sweden Tax Legitimacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3342,7 +3342,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy">Structural Data: Sweden Tax Le
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th><th>Source</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Labour-income top marginal rate (incl. municipal)</td><td>~52–57%</td><td>Skatteverket</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Capital-gains rate on listed shares</td><td>30%</td><td>Skatteverket</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Effective 3:12 rate (realistic)</td><td>~20–25%</td><td>Riksrevisionen 2024</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Billionaires per million inhabitants</td><td>~52–55</td><td>Forbes 2024</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td></tr><tr><td>Gini coefficient (disposable income)</td><td>0.303</td><td>SCB 2023</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Wealth Gini</td><td>0.80+ (EU: 0.73 avg)</td><td>ECB HFCS</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Interpretation</strong>: Disposable-income Gini is moderate (EU average); wealth Gini is among the highest in Europe. The interpellation implicitly targets the wealth dimension, where S's argument is strongest.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension">Analytic Framework: Social-Contract Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension">Analytic Framework: Social-Contract Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[Labour Income High Tax] -->|Funds| B[Welfare State]
     C[Capital Income Lower Effective Tax] -->|Concentrates| D[Wealth Elite]
@@ -3355,7 +3355,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension">Analytic Framework: Socia
     style H fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style D fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style E fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3392,28 +3392,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Watch window</th><th>Analytical significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson response tone on "review" word</td><td>April 29 debate</td><td>Will she concede rhetorical ground?</td></tr><tr><td>LO (trade union confederation) reaction</td><td>April 29–May 3</td><td>Coordinated campaign signal</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet) motion filings</td><td>Next 14 days</td><td>Left-flank amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Finansdepartementet budget preview</td><td>May 2026</td><td>Tactical tax-policy announcement</td></tr><tr><td>Skatteverket analytical publications</td><td>Rolling</td><td>Structural-data releases</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29">Response-Strategy Forecast (Svantesson, April 29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29">Response-Strategy Forecast (Svantesson, April 29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.60): Svantesson announces willingness to "look at targeted elements" without committing to a systemic review. Defends the 2025 budget as "broad-based relief" for ordinary workers. Cites 2026 budget preparation as forum for continued dialogue.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.25): Svantesson defends 3:12 as "entrepreneurship incentive" and pivots to reducing labour taxes further — tactically appealing to swing voters but cements S's structural critique.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.15): Announcement of a formal <em>utredning</em> (government inquiry) into tax-system legitimacy — this would be a strategic concession but gives S a year of narrative control.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-4">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-4">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Fairness framing, top-10 voter issue, sharp ideological contrast
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — Svantesson is skilled; 3:12 is defensible; timeline favours government (budget in autumn)
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 7.8/10 — Strong systemic argument, harder to "quick-win" in single debate</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10434">HD10434<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10434"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10434-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10434 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:434
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-15 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 7.2/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Leif Nysmed (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister Andreas Carlson (KD)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-29 (9 days remaining as of analysis date)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Leif Nysmed (S), a Stockholm-county S MP with a track record of housing-policy interpellations, targets Infrastructure/Housing Minister Andreas Carlson (KD) on the 900-unit year-on-year decline in Stockholm-region housing starts. The interpellation relies on Länsstyrelsen Stockholm's municipality-aggregated forecast: 11,091 starts in 2026 vs ~12,000 in 2025. This is Carlson's 6th+ interpellation of the session and the first quantitatively grounded housing-specific one.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vilka åtgärder avser ministern och regeringen att vidta för att öka bostadsbyggandet i Stockholmsregionen?"
 (<em>"What measures do the minister and the government intend to take to increase housing construction in the Stockholm region?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The 900-unit decline is a <strong>government-source-confirmed metric</strong> (Länsstyrelsen Stockholm is a state authority under the Ministry of Finance), which removes the government's standard rhetorical defence that opposition housing statistics are contested. Carlson cannot dispute the baseline. This transforms the interpellation from a policy debate into an accountability test: either Carlson announces concrete counter-measures by April 29, or the decline becomes the headline.</p>
 <p><strong>Why it matters for Election 2026</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Housing affordability consistently ranks among the top-5 voter concerns in Stockholm-county polling (SCB/SVT Väljarbarometern). Stockholm county has 29 of 349 Riksdag seats (8.3%) — any swing here materially affects coalition arithmetic. S has held ~28–31% in Stockholm polls; a concrete Carlson failure narrative could lift S to 33–35% in the seat-rich region.</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern analysis</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is the <strong>6th+ interpellation targeting Carlson</strong> in the 2025/26 session:</p>
@@ -3439,7 +3439,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <li>(P=0.40) Pivot to national aggregates where 2026 shows marginal increase in other regions</li>
 <li>(P=0.20) Concede the decline and announce an emergency package (politically costly for KD)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-quantitative-context-1">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quantitative-context-1">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3475,7 +3475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-quantitative-context-1">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th>2024</th><th>2025 (est.)</th><th>2026 (forecast)</th><th>YoY % change 25→26</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Stockholm-region housing starts</td><td>~13,800</td><td>~11,991</td><td>11,091</td><td><strong>−7.5%</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm demand gap (vs Boverket target)</td><td>−4,200</td><td>−5,800</td><td><strong>−6,700</strong></td><td>Widening</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden national housing starts</td><td>~23,500</td><td>~22,000</td><td>~23,000</td><td>+4.5%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Derived indicator</strong>: Stockholm is <strong>underperforming the national trend</strong>, which weakens the government's "national cycle" defence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-interpellation-linkage">Cross-Interpellation Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-interpellation-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-interpellation-linkage">Cross-Interpellation Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-interpellation-linkage"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     HD10434[HD10434 Stockholm housing] --> AC[Andreas Carlson KD]
     HD10417[HD10417 Södra stambanan rail] --> AC
@@ -3488,7 +3488,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-interpellation-linkage">Cross-Interpellation Linkage<a class=""
 
     style AC fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style NARRATIVE fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3525,42 +3525,42 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Carlson response tone (April 29)</td><td>Defensive vs proactive</td><td>Signals coalition confidence</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen announcement of PBL revision</td><td>Pre-May 5</td><td>Tactical concession indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Boverket 2-month forecast update (expected May)</td><td>Further downward revision</td><td>Accelerates narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Länsstyrelsen press releases</td><td>New municipality warnings</td><td>Ground-truth confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>LO/Byggnads union statements</td><td>Coordinated attack</td><td>S-union alignment signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-5">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-5">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Top-5 Stockholm-voter issue; 29-seat swing region
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🔴 HIGH — State-source data; narrow rhetorical options
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 8.5/10 — Concrete, local, quantified, accountable to a named minister</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10435">HD10435<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10435"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10435-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10435 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:435<br>
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-16 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 9.0/10<br>
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Jamal El-Haj (-) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Utrikesminister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>The most substantive and historically ambitious interpellation of the batch. Independent MP El-Haj (former S member) demands that Sweden's government require Israel to: (1) accept accountability for the 1948 Bernadotte assassination, (2) issue public apology, and (3) pay financial compensation to the Bernadotte family.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text">Three Explicit Demands (from full text)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text">Three Explicit Demands (from full text)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><em>"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att staten Israel tar ansvar för mordet på Folke Bernadotte?"</em></li>
 <li><em>"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att Israel framför en offentlig ursäkt till familjen Bernadotte och till Sverige?"</em></li>
 <li><em>"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att Israel utger ekonomisk kompensation till Bernadottes familj?"</em></li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical background</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Count Folke Bernadotte, Swedish diplomat and UN mediator, was assassinated by the Lehi (Stern Gang) paramilitary group on September 17, 1948 in Jerusalem. The murderers were never prosecuted — one (Yitzhak Shamir) later became Israeli Prime Minister. The interpellation cites that perpetrators were decorated with a "tapperhetsmedalj" (valor medal) for their role in "contributing to Israel's founding."</p>
 <p><strong>Contemporary link</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: El-Haj explicitly connects the historical assassination to the 2025/26 Israeli Knesset legislation enabling death penalty. He argues both reflect a pattern of state-sanctioned political violence against perceived opponents.</p>
 <p><strong>Diplomatic context</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Malmer Stenergard has already publicly criticized Israeli death penalty legislation (noted in the interpellation text). However, calling for Israeli accountability, apology, and compensation goes far beyond the government's current position. Response is due April 30 — in 10 days.</p>
 <p><strong>Identity of filer</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Jamal El-Haj is listed as independent (-). He was previously associated with S before breaking over Israel-Palestine policy. His willingness to file this interpellation without S party endorsement indicates that S party leadership calculated the demands are too diplomatically extreme for official opposition policy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-accountability-assessment">Accountability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-accountability-assessment">Accountability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Will government comply with demands?</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Almost certainly not. Sweden will acknowledge the historical events and maintain its criticism of current Israeli policies, but demanding formal apology and compensation is a diplomatic step not supported by current Swedish foreign policy doctrine.</p>
 <p><strong>Will this embarrass Malmer Stenergard?</strong> [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: The response window (April 30) creates media attention. If the minister gives a weak or evasive answer to three explicit numbered demands, opposition MPs can point to the specific unanswered questions.</p>
 <p><strong>Response deadline</strong>: April 30, 2026 (SISVA) — URGENT<br>
 <strong>ANM</strong>: April 21, 2026</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10436">HD10436<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10436"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10436-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10436 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:436
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-16 | <strong>Status</strong>: <strong>ÅTERTAGEN (WITHDRAWN)</strong> | <strong>Significance</strong>: 4.0/10 (significance derives from withdrawal pattern, not content)
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Mats Wiking (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Gymnasie-, högskole- och forskningsminister Lotta Edholm (L)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Mats Wiking (S) filed this interpellation on measures to strengthen Sweden's space industry, then <strong>withdrew</strong> it before chamber announcement. The original text emphasised the growing societal importance of space (satellite data, defence-linked infrastructure) and the strategic significance of the Kiruna/Esrange complex as NATO's only operational European satellite-launch site for small launchers.</p>
 <p>Because the interpellation was withdrawn, its <strong>political signal</strong> — rather than its policy substance — becomes the analytic focus.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-why-withdrawals-matter">Why Withdrawals Matter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-withdrawals-matter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-withdrawals-matter">Why Withdrawals Matter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-withdrawals-matter"></a></h3>
 <p>In Swedish parliamentary practice, interpellations are rarely withdrawn. Withdrawal patterns (<em>återtagen</em>) typically signal one of four conditions:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Negotiated resolution</strong>: The minister or ministry provided informal assurances or concessions that satisfied the interpellator</li>
@@ -3573,7 +3573,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-why-withdrawals-matter">Why Withdrawals Matter<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): <strong>Tactical consolidation</strong>. With S filing 7 interpellations in 6 days (April 14–17), withdrawing one signals deliberate prioritisation. S's top-tier attacks (HD10437 EU directive, HD10438 shelters, HD10434 housing, HD10433 tax) are clearly prioritised for campaign messaging. Space industry, while strategically important, does not fit S's preferred pre-election frame of <strong>domestic welfare and accountability</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>Less likely</strong> (P=0.15): <strong>Information update</strong>. The government may have made a public announcement (budget item, commission report) between April 16 filing and the withdrawal decision that rendered the interpellation unnecessary.</p>
 <p><strong>Low probability</strong> (P=0.05): <strong>Internal party coordination</strong>. S leadership may have reviewed the strategic fit and decided this interpellation was off-message.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry">Strategic Context: Sweden's Space Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry">Strategic Context: Sweden's Space Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Esrange (Kiruna) — Europe's only mainland-based operational sounding-rocket site; rapidly developing small-satellite launch capability</li>
@@ -3591,7 +3591,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry">Strategic Context: Sweden's
 <li>Industrial policy (export-oriented tech sector)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>A lone backbench interpellation cannot do justice to this complexity — which partially explains why it may have been withdrawn in favour of more focused attacks.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking">Actor Profile: Mats Wiking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking">Actor Profile: Mats Wiking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</p>
 <ul>
 <li>S MP from Västra Götalands län norra</li>
@@ -3600,7 +3600,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking">Actor Profile: Mats Wiking<a class="" aria
 <li>Possible professional interest in space/industrial policy</li>
 <li>Withdrawal behaviour consistent with collaborative rather than antagonistic positioning</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm">Target Profile: Lotta Edholm<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm">Target Profile: Lotta Edholm<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</p>
 <ul>
 <li>L Minister for Higher Education and Research</li>
@@ -3609,7 +3609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm">Target Profile: Lotta Edholm<a class=""
 <li>Relatively non-confrontational ministerial style</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The combination (non-confrontational S MP + collaborative L minister + strategically important sector) favours the "negotiated resolution" hypothesis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal">Intelligence Value of the Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal">Intelligence Value of the Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Counter-intelligence reading</strong>: The withdrawal itself is a <strong>positive signal</strong> for the government's space-industry policy trajectory. It suggests:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Informal cross-party consensus is functional on strategic industrial policy</li>
@@ -3618,7 +3618,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal">Intelligence Value of the Withd
 <li>There is no exploitable political failure in the Swedish space sector as of April 2026</li>
 </ol>
 <p>For the S campaign narrative, this is a notable <em>absence</em>: S has no concrete accountability material on space industry to deploy in Election 2026 messaging.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers">Comparative Context: Space-Industry Politics in Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers">Comparative Context: Space-Industry Politics in Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3651,7 +3651,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers">Comparat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Space policy profile</th><th>Political salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Launch site, commercial launches, NATO-aligned</td><td>Rising</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Andøya launch site; strong defence linkage</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Smaller ecosystem; ICEYE commercial leader</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>No launch site; strong CubeSat university sector</td><td>Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sweden's position as a launch-host nation is unique in the Nordic peer group and creates strategic leverage within EU and NATO space cooperation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3688,30 +3688,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Edholm policy announcement within 30 days</td><td>Esrange investment/NATO alignment</td><td>Confirms "negotiated resolution" hypothesis</td></tr><tr><td>Follow-up S interpellation on space (next 60 days)</td><td>Different filer, same topic</td><td>Would invalidate hypothesis</td></tr><tr><td>Rymdstyrelsen budget preview for 2026</td><td>Autumn 2026</td><td>Resource confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>GKN Aerospace announcements</td><td>Rolling</td><td>Industry-trajectory signal</td></tr><tr><td>NATO Space Centre updates</td><td>Rolling</td><td>Alliance-level indicator</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-6">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-6">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟢 LOW (direct) / 🟧 MEDIUM (via defence/industry framing)
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟢 LOW — Withdrawal signals no current exploitable failure
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 3.0/10 — Not deployable in current form</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodological-note">Methodological Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodological-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodological-note">Methodological Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodological-note"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis treats the <strong>withdrawal itself</strong> as the primary analytical object. In political-intelligence practice, non-events and withdrawals often carry higher signal-to-noise ratios than routine filings because they reveal behind-the-scenes coordination. Monitoring <em>pattern</em> deviations (e.g., the ratio of filed vs withdrawn interpellations per party per session) can surface strategic inflection points that raw filing counts miss.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10437">HD10437<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10437"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10437-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10437 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:437<br>
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-17 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 9.2/10</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-8">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-8">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L) on Sweden's failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive. The government withdrew its own implementation proposal, and Sweden will not meet the EU deadline.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Varför väljer ministern och regeringen att inte implementera direktivet?"<br>
 ("Why does the minister and the government choose not to implement the directive?")</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is the most legally and politically consequential interpellation of the batch. The EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive 2023/970/EU) entered into force in June 2023 with a transposition deadline of June 7, 2026. Sweden's government WITHDREW its implementation proposal, meaning the directive will NOT be implemented on time. This creates: (1) EU infringement risk, (2) electoral vulnerability for coalition on gender equality, and (3) a documented policy failure that S can use in campaign materials.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this matters for Election 2026</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Sweden's gender pay gap is "bestående och har till och med ökat de senaste åren" (persistent and has even increased in recent years) — the interpellation's own words. L, as a liberal party claiming commitment to gender equality, cannot reconcile its values with its minister presiding over this compliance failure. S has a ready-made campaign message.</p>
 <p><strong>Accountability dimension</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is not a nuanced policy disagreement — the government withdrew its own proposal. The factual record is established. Larsson must explain why Sweden chose to miss an EU deadline on equal pay.</p>
 <p><strong>Response deadline</strong>: May 5, 2026 (SISVA)<br>
 <strong>ANM (announced to chamber)</strong>: April 21, 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline">Mermaid Diagram: EU Directive Compliance Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline">Mermaid Diagram: EU Directive Compliance Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title EU Pay Transparency Directive: Sweden's Compliance Crisis
     dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
@@ -3724,22 +3724,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline">Mermaid Diagram: EU
     Interpellation filed (Amloh/S)    :2026-04-17, 1d
     Chamber announcement (ANM)        :2026-04-21, 1d
     Minister response deadline        :crit, 2026-05-05, 1d</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-7">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-7">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟦 VERY HIGH — Pay equity is top-5 women voters issue<br>
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: The withdrawal of the proposal is irrevocable — no spin possible</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10438">HD10438<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10438"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10438-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10438 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:438<br>
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-17 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 8.5/10<br>
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Sofia Amloh (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-9">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-9">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson (L) on the nationwide closure of women's shelters (kvinnojourer). Civil society organizations critical to gender-based violence prevention are shutting down due to funding gaps.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Hur tänker ministern agera för att kvinnojourer inte ska behöva lägga ned sin viktiga verksamhet?"<br>
 ("How does the minister intend to act so that women's shelters do not have to close their important operations?")</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Women's shelters in Sweden are operated by "idéburna organisationer" (civil society/non-profit organizations). Many are closing due to inadequate state funding. The interpellation frames this as a direct failure of the government's anti-violence against women strategy. The consequence cited: "stora konsekvenser för möjligheten att lämna en våldsam relation" (major consequences for the ability to leave a violent relationship).</p>
 <p><strong>Coordination significance</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is filed the SAME DAY as frs 2025/26:437 (EU Pay Transparency Directive). Both target the same minister on related gender equality themes. Amloh is clearly executing a coordinated parliamentary assault on Larsson's portfolio from multiple angles simultaneously.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy context</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Sweden's government has, over recent years, shifted funding away from civil society anti-violence organizations toward municipal and regional delivery. The interpellation implies this shift has left funding gaps that women's shelters cannot fill.</p>
@@ -3747,11 +3747,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <p><strong>Response deadline</strong>: May 5, 2026 (SISVA)<br>
 <strong>ANM</strong>: April 21, 2026 (same as HD10437 — simultaneous chamber announcement)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Focus</strong>: HD10437 (frs 2025/26:437) in EU comparative context
 <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2</p>
 <p>This document places Sweden's apparent Pay Transparency Directive transposition failure in comparative EU context, which materially strengthens (or weakens) the political-accountability narrative. Directive 2023/970/EU — the "Pay Transparency Directive" — was adopted on 10 May 2023 with a <strong>transposition deadline of 7 June 2026</strong> (Art. 34).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-directive-summary-2023970eu">Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-directive-summary-2023970eu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-directive-summary-2023970eu">Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-directive-summary-2023970eu"></a></h3>
 <p>Core obligations on Member States:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Mandatory gender pay-gap reporting for employers ≥100 workers (phased by size)</li>
@@ -3762,7 +3762,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-directive-summary-2023970eu">Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)<a class=
 <li>Compensation for workers for proven discrimination (no ceiling)</li>
 <li>Member-state designation of enforcement bodies</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states">Transposition Status Across Selected Member States<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states">Transposition Status Across Selected Member States<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Based on public legislative tracking as of April 2026 — [MEDIUM confidence 🟧] due to the rapidly-shifting transposition landscape. Sources: Member State government websites, European Commission DG EMPL communications, national union reports.</em></p>
 
 
@@ -3849,14 +3849,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states">Transposition Sta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Status (April 2026)</th><th>Legislative vehicle</th><th align="center">Expected on-time?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>✅ Transposed (2024)</td><td>Gender Pay Gap Information Act 2021 + Amendments 2024</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Spain</strong></td><td>✅ Transposed (2024)</td><td>Real Decreto extensions</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>🟡 In advanced parliamentary debate</td><td>Loi Egalité professionnelle reform</td><td align="center">✅ Likely by June</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>🟡 Draft legislation (<em>Entgelttransparenzgesetz</em> reform) in Bundestag</td><td>Federal law amendment</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>🟡 Draft legislation in Tweede Kamer</td><td>Wet gelijke beloning</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>🟡 Tripartite negotiations concluding</td><td>Ligelønsloven amendment</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>🟢 Government bill introduced</td><td>Tasa-arvolaki amendment</td><td align="center">✅ Likely by June</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Belgium</strong></td><td>🟢 Royal Decree transposition</td><td>Loi salaire égal amendment</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Poland</strong></td><td>🔴 Delayed; no active bill</td><td>—</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Hungary</strong></td><td>🔴 No transposition activity</td><td>—</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Italy</strong></td><td>🟡 Draft in Camera dei Deputati</td><td>Legge delega</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 Sweden</strong></td><td>🔴 <strong>Proposal withdrawn; no active legislation</strong></td><td>—</td><td align="center">❌ <strong>Will miss deadline</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong> [MEDIUM 🟧]: Transposition tracking requires continuous monitoring; some Member States may have made progress not yet publicly reported. The general picture — that Sweden, Poland, and Hungary are the most visibly behind — is robust.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway">Strategic Comparative Takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway">Strategic Comparative Takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's transposition failure is <strong>not an isolated underperformance</strong>. Poland and Hungary also appear likely to miss the deadline. However, the political significance is different:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Poland and Hungary</strong> have complicated ideological trajectories on EU social-policy directives — their non-compliance is expected and politically "priced-in" by the Commission.</li>
 <li><strong>Sweden's</strong> non-compliance is politically surprising because Sweden has historically been among the strongest advocates for EU gender-equality law and has one of the most developed national equality-law frameworks.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This means Sweden's failure carries <strong>higher reputational cost per unit of non-compliance</strong> than Poland's or Hungary's. The EU political economy treats a Swedish gender-equality failure as more damaging to the directive's legitimacy than an Eastern European failure.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context">Gender Pay Gap Comparative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context">Gender Pay Gap Comparative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Eurostat unadjusted gender pay gap data, most recent available (2023):</em></p>
 
 
@@ -3930,7 +3930,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context">Gender Pay Gap Comparative Contex
 <li>However, the interpellation's own text (frs 2025/26:437) notes the gap is <em>"bestående och har till och med ökat de senaste åren"</em> (persistent and has even increased in recent years) — a specifically Swedish trend-reversal</li>
 <li>This means: Sweden is comparatively good but <em>getting worse</em>, which amplifies the political cost of failing the directive that is meant to reverse the trend</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison">Legal-Regulatory Environment Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison">Legal-Regulatory Environment Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3986,7 +3986,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison">Legal-Regulatory Environment
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (current)</th><th>EU Directive (required by 7 Jun 2026)</th><th>Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pay-gap reporting</td><td>Employers ≥10 (annual <em>lönekartläggning</em> since 2017)</td><td>≥100 phased</td><td>Sweden partially ahead</td></tr><tr><td>Pay information on request</td><td>Limited</td><td>Required</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Joint pay assessment threshold</td><td>N/A</td><td>≥5% unexplained gap</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Recruitment pay transparency</td><td>No obligation</td><td>Required (salary range)</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Burden of proof</td><td>Shared</td><td>Shifted to employer</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation</td><td>Capped in practice</td><td>Uncapped</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement body</td><td>DO (Diskrimineringsombudsmannen)</td><td>To be designated</td><td>Alignment possible</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden's <em>lönekartläggning</em> obligation under <em>Diskrimineringslagen</em> is an <strong>early-mover strength</strong>, but the directive's broader scope (recruitment, worker-information rights, compensation, burden of proof) is <strong>not currently met</strong>. Transposition is substantive, not merely formal.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response">Trade Union and Civil Society Comparative Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response">Trade Union and Civil Society Comparative Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4024,7 +4024,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response">Trade Union and C
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Trade union position</th><th>Employer position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>LO and TCO support directive; pressure for timely transposition</td><td>Svenskt Näringsliv: implementation "complex"; supports phasing</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>DGB strongly supports; draft already tabled</td><td>BDA: moderate reservations</td></tr><tr><td>France</td><td>CFDT supports; campaign visible</td><td>Medef: cautious</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>FNV supports</td><td>VNO-NCW: moderate reservations</td></tr><tr><td>Poland</td><td>Solidarity moderate support</td><td>PKPP Lewiatan: cautious</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific observation</strong>: Amloh's interpellation (HD10437) is consistent with LO/TCO positioning. The coordinated S–union alignment is a standard Social Democratic play and is facilitated by the interpellation creating a documented minister-accountability record that unions can cite.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-infringement-risk-assessment">Infringement Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-infringement-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-infringement-risk-assessment">Infringement Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-infringement-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>If Sweden misses the June 7 deadline, the European Commission has standard infringement procedure options:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Letter of Formal Notice</strong> (Month 1–3 after deadline)</li>
@@ -4034,13 +4034,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-infringement-risk-assessment">Infringement Risk Assessment<a class=""
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Historic Commission practice</strong>: The Commission typically allows ~2–4 months grace post-deadline for late transposition before formal action. Sweden would likely receive a letter of formal notice by late 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Political significance for Election 2026</strong>: Any EU Commission communication during the campaign window (summer 2026) becomes domestic-political ammunition. S's interpellation strategy is timed to create a documentary record <em>before</em> this EU process starts, positioning S as the domestic accountability actor and the Commission as the external authority.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns">Lessons from Cross-Country Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns">Lessons from Cross-Country Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Ireland and Spain</strong> demonstrate that early transposition is possible even in countries with complex industrial relations. The Irish approach (employer-driven reporting with statutory framework) is a viable model that Sweden could replicate rapidly.</li>
 <li><strong>France and Germany</strong> show that late-but-active transposition reduces political cost — the problem is <strong>withdrawal of a proposal with no replacement</strong>, which is Sweden's specific situation.</li>
 <li><strong>Denmark and Finland</strong> demonstrate that tripartite-negotiation models (Nordic tradition) can produce on-time transposition — raising the question of why Sweden's tripartite structure has not delivered here.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article">Recommendations for the Published Article<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article">Recommendations for the Published Article<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article"></a></h3>
 <p>The article should explicitly include:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Sweden's transposition failure in EU context (not an isolated issue, but politically more costly per unit)</li>
@@ -4049,7 +4049,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article">Recommendations for the Pu
 <li>The Irish and Spanish early-transposition models as viable alternatives</li>
 <li>The infringement-timeline implications for Election 2026 messaging</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-references">References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-references">References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Directive (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 to strengthen the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms</li>
 <li>Eurostat: Gender pay gap statistics (2023 most recent)</li>
@@ -4059,10 +4059,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-references">References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence grade</strong>: MEDIUM–HIGH 🟧🟩 — Directive and Swedish law facts are HIGH; cross-country transposition status is MEDIUM due to rapidly-shifting legislative landscape across 27 Member States</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Total Interpellations</strong>: 10</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience">🔴 TIER 1 — High Electoral Impact (Pre-Election 2026 Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience">🔴 TIER 1 — High Electoral Impact (Pre-Election 2026 Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4097,7 +4097,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience">🔴 TIER
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Electoral Salience</th><th>Key Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD10437</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:437</td><td>Gender Equality / EU Compliance</td><td>🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Sweden to MISS EU Pay Transparency Directive deadline — government implementation proposal withdrawn</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10438</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:438</td><td>Gender Equality / Women's Safety</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td><td>Women's shelters (kvinnojourer) closing nationwide — direct connection to gender-based violence prevention</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10433</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:433</td><td>Fiscal Policy / Tax Fairness</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td><td>Sweden has most billionaires per capita while taxing labor heavily — social contract legitimacy crisis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues">🟡 TIER 2 — Significant Political Accountability Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues">🟡 TIER 2 — Significant Political Accountability Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4139,7 +4139,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues">🟡 TIER 2 —
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Electoral Salience</th><th>Key Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD10434</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:434</td><td>Housing / Regional Development</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Stockholm housing starts down 900 units vs 2025 — Carlson's 6th+ interpellation on infrastructure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10435</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:435</td><td>Foreign Policy / Human Rights / Israel</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historical assassination (1948) linked to current Israeli death penalty law — diplomatic pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10432</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:432</td><td>Healthcare Infrastructure</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Hospital investment crisis — 1960s buildings, no state guarantee mechanism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10431</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:431</td><td>Foreign Aid / Human Rights</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>LGBTQ+ rights under global pressure — Dousa's (M) foreign aid alignment questioned</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny">🟢 TIER 3 — Government Accountability / Opposition Scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny">🟢 TIER 3 — Government Accountability / Opposition Scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4170,7 +4170,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny">🟢 TIER 3
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD10430</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:430</td><td>Religious Freedom / Social Policy</td><td>Mosque hate-speech targeting — SD pressure on KD minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10429</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:429</td><td>Freedom of Expression / Justice</td><td>SD presses on proposition 2025/26:133 and press freedom tradition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10436</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:436</td><td>Research Policy / Space Industry</td><td><strong>WITHDRAWN</strong> — Politically significant: S withdrew space industry interpellation suggesting negotiated resolution or internal pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-by-submitting-party">Classification by Submitting Party<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-submitting-party"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-submitting-party">Classification by Submitting Party<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-submitting-party"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4207,7 +4207,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-by-submitting-party">Classification by Submitting Part
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Count</th><th>Strategy</th><th>Ministers Targeted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>7</td><td>Pre-election accountability campaign across gender, housing, healthcare, taxation</td><td>Larsson (L) x2, Carlson (KD), Svantesson (M), Lann (KD) + 1 withdrawn</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>Freedom of expression + religious institution oversight</td><td>Strömmer (M), Forssmed (KD)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>Human rights/development aid</td><td>Dousa (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Independent (-)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>Foreign policy accountability — Bernadotte/Israel</td><td>Malmer Stenergard (M)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-document-confidence-scores">Document Confidence Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-confidence-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-confidence-scores">Document Confidence Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-confidence-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4280,8 +4280,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-confidence-scores">Document Confidence Scores<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Significance</th><th>Evidence Quality</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>9/10</td><td>Full text available — EU directive failure documented</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>8/10</td><td>Full text available — women's shelter crisis with concrete question</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10435</td><td>9/10</td><td>Full text available — detailed historical/legal analysis</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>7/10</td><td>Full text available — systemic tax fairness critique</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>7/10</td><td>Full text available — 11,091 units + Länsstyrelsen quote</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>6/10</td><td>Summary data — 1960s hospital infrastructure crisis</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10431</td><td>6/10</td><td>Summary data — LGBTQ+ rights international</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td>5/10</td><td>Summary data — mosque hate-speech scrutiny</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>5/10</td><td>Summary data — freedom of expression prop 2025/26:133</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10436</td><td>3/10</td><td>WITHDRAWN — politically significant absence</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-classification-dimensions">Secondary Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-classification-dimensions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-by-accountability-target-type">By Accountability Target Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-accountability-target-type"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-classification-dimensions">Secondary Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-classification-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-accountability-target-type">By Accountability Target Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-accountability-target-type"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4323,7 +4323,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-accountability-target-type">By Accountability Target Type<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Target type</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>dok_ids</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU-compliance failure</strong></td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10437</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Domestic service-delivery failure</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td>HD10438 (shelters), HD10432 (hospitals), HD10434 (housing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal/Systemic policy</strong></td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10433 (tax)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Foreign-policy / HR</strong></td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10435 (Bernadotte), HD10431 (LGBTQI+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security / Civil-liberties balance</strong></td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10429 (expression), HD10430 (extremism)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Industrial policy</strong> (withdrawn)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10436</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-by-strategic-function">By Strategic Function<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-strategic-function"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-strategic-function">By Strategic Function<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-strategic-function"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4360,7 +4360,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-strategic-function">By Strategic Function<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Function</th><th>Description</th><th>dok_ids</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document-the-failure</strong></td><td>Creates a paper record for future exploitation</td><td>HD10437, HD10438, HD10434, HD10433</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Force-a-position</strong></td><td>Compels minister to state a policy on sensitive ground</td><td>HD10435, HD10431</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Brand-signalling</strong></td><td>Distinguishes filing party from coalition partners or opposition peers</td><td>HD10429 (SD inverts), HD10431 (C distinguishes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Base-mobilisation</strong></td><td>Speaks to party's voter base</td><td>HD10430 (SD base), HD10438 (S female voters)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saturation-targeting</strong></td><td>Denies minister any safe policy area</td><td>HD10434 (6th+ Carlson interpellation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-by-evidence-density">By Evidence Density<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-evidence-density"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-evidence-density">By Evidence Density<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-evidence-density"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellations with the highest evidence density (verifiable data points referenced in the text) are the hardest to refute and therefore most durable for accountability purposes:</p>
 
 
@@ -4410,7 +4410,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-evidence-density">By Evidence Density<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence density</th><th>Notable data points</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10437</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>EU directive 2023/970, June 7 2026 deadline, government proposal withdrawal</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10434</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>11,091 units, Länsstyrelsen Stockholm source, year-on-year -900</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>HD10435</td><td>HIGH</td><td>1948 date, Folke Bernadotte ID, 3 specific demands, Israeli death-penalty law citation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD10433</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>3:12 system reference, Sweden billionaire per-capita</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD10438</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>"runt om i landet" (nationwide) — qualitative; would be HIGH with specific closures</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6–10</td><td>Others</td><td>MEDIUM / LOW</td><td>Thematic rather than quantitative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-by-coalition-stress-vector">By Coalition Stress Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-coalition-stress-vector"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-coalition-stress-vector">By Coalition Stress Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-coalition-stress-vector"></a></h4>
 <p>The interpellations place different amounts of stress on different coalition fault lines:</p>
 
 
@@ -4458,18 +4458,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-coalition-stress-vector">By Coalition Stress Vector<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Fault line</th><th>Stressed by</th><th align="center">Level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L ↔ Gender equality brand vs coalition inaction</td><td>HD10437, HD10438</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>KD ↔ Infrastructure competence vs S saturation</td><td>HD10434 (+ HD10424, HD10428, etc.)</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>M ↔ Foreign-policy pragmatism vs historical accountability</td><td>HD10435</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>M ↔ Tax doctrine vs fairness critique</td><td>HD10433</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>M–L ↔ Progressive HR vs SD pressure</td><td>HD10431</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>M ↔ Security vs liberty</td><td>HD10429</td><td align="center">🟡 LOW–MED</td></tr><tr><td>SD–KD ↔ Religious oversight instruments</td><td>HD10430</td><td align="center">🟡 LOW–MED</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-classification-patterns">Strategic Classification Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-classification-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing">Pattern 1: Amloh Dual-Filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-classification-patterns">Strategic Classification Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-classification-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing">Pattern 1: Amloh Dual-Filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing"></a></h4>
 <p>Two interpellations filed by the same MP (Sofia Amloh, S) on the same day against the same minister (Nina Larsson, L) on related themes. <strong>Frequency of such dual-filings in rm 2025/26</strong>: This is the first observed instance. This is the defining coordination signal of the wave.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation">Pattern 2: Carlson Saturation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation">Pattern 2: Carlson Saturation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation"></a></h4>
 <p>Andreas Carlson (KD) is the target of 6+ active interpellations in this session across 5 distinct policy sub-areas (housing, aviation, rail, roads, defence infrastructure). <strong>Frequency</strong>: Unprecedented in the 2022–2026 Tidö government. Previous most-targeted minister was the 2023 Justice Minister with 4 interpellations over 6 weeks.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation">Pattern 3: Independent-MP Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation">Pattern 3: Independent-MP Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation"></a></h4>
 <p>Jamal El-Haj (-) — former S, now independent — filing a high-impact foreign-policy interpellation with specific demands. <strong>Frequency</strong>: Rare but not unprecedented. The independent platform allows demands that a party-affiliated MP would not make (for party-discipline reasons).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure">Pattern 4: SD Inverted Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure">Pattern 4: SD Inverted Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p>SD filed two interpellations simultaneously on opposite speech-regulation sides (HD10429 free-speech against M; HD10430 religious-extremism against KD). <strong>Frequency</strong>: Deliberate pattern; signals SD's "balanced agenda-setting" brand positioning.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal">Pattern 5: Tactical Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal">Pattern 5: Tactical Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10436 withdrawn by S after filing. <strong>Frequency</strong>: Rare; typically 1–3 per session out of 400+ filings. Signals either informal resolution or tactical re-prioritisation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-confidence-audit">Classification Confidence Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-confidence-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-confidence-audit">Classification Confidence Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-confidence-audit"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 10 documents assigned to Tier 1/2/3 with explicit evidence</li>
 <li>All classifications cross-checked against document full text (where available)</li>
@@ -4479,10 +4479,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-confidence-audit">Classification Confidence Audit<a cl
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Overall classification confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (primary-source evidence for 5 of 10; metadata evidence for 5)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Purpose</strong>: Connect interpellations to policy patterns, minister records, and prior session events</p>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters">Thematic Cross-Reference Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance">Cluster 1: Gender Equality &#x26; EU Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters">Thematic Cross-Reference Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance">Cluster 1: Gender Equality &#x26; EU Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:437 (HD10437) ─── Pay Transparency Directive failure ─── Nina Larsson (L)
 frs 2025/26:438 (HD10438) ─── Women's shelter closures ─────────── Nina Larsson (L)
      │
@@ -4491,7 +4491,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance">Cluster 1: Gender Equality
      └── Both SISVA 2026-05-05 = synchronized response deadlines
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Supporting context</strong>: Sweden has a persistent gender pay gap. EU directive gives structural mechanism to address it. Government withdrawal of implementation = documented policy failure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability">Cluster 2: Andreas Carlson Infrastructure Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability">Cluster 2: Andreas Carlson Infrastructure Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:434 (HD10434) ─── Stockholm housing decline (-900 units)
 frs 2025/26:428 (HD10428) ─── Scandinavian Mountain Airport emergency base [from prev batch]
 frs 2025/26:425 (HD10425) ─── Defense infrastructure costs [from prev batch]
@@ -4500,23 +4500,23 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability">Cluster 2: A
 frs 2025/26:417 (HD10417) ─── Södra stambanan double track [from prev batch]
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Six+ interpellations targeting Carlson over 4 weeks. S is building a comprehensive "infrastructure failure" narrative. Each interpellation adds a new failure domain: airports, rail, roads, housing, defense logistics.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights">Cluster 3: Foreign Policy &#x26; Human Rights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights">Cluster 3: Foreign Policy &#x26; Human Rights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:435 (HD10435) ─── Folke Bernadotte/Israel (El-Haj, -) ─── Malmer Stenergard (M)
 frs 2025/26:431 (HD10431) ─── LGBTQ+ rights/foreign aid (Lasses, C) ─ Benjamin Dousa (M)
 frs 2025/26:426 (HD10426) ─── Israel death penalty (prev batch) ──── Malmer Stenergard (M)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Two independent streams targeting Swedish foreign policy on Israel-Palestine and human rights. El-Haj connects HD10435 explicitly to HD10426 (citing same Israeli death penalty legislation). This creates a thematic arc across multiple sessions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure">Cluster 4: Healthcare &#x26; Social Infrastructure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure">Cluster 4: Healthcare &#x26; Social Infrastructure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:432 (HD10432) ─── Hospital building investment crisis ─── Elisabet Lann (KD)
 frs 2025/26:415 (HD10415) ─── Statligt säkerställande av bra vård [from prev batch] ─ Lann (KD)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: S's Robert Olesen has now filed two interpellations against the same KD health minister on related hospital infrastructure topics. Clear coordinated strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract">Cluster 5: Economic Policy &#x26; Social Contract<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract">Cluster 5: Economic Policy &#x26; Social Contract<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:433 (HD10433) ─── Tax reform (S) ──────────────────── Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 frs 2025/26:421 (HD10421) ─── Integration policy (S) [prev batch] ─ Svantesson (M)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Svantesson (M) faces attacks on both tax fairness and integration policy — the economic and social dimensions of the pre-election debate.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-minister-response-status">Minister Response Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-response-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-minister-response-status">Minister Response Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-response-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4587,18 +4587,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-minister-response-status">Minister Response Status<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Minister</th><th>Party</th><th>Active Interpellations</th><th>Responses Received</th><th>Response Rate</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Andreas Carlson</td><td>KD</td><td>6+</td><td>0 (all "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Nina Larsson</td><td>L</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>M</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabeth Svantesson</td><td>M</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabet Lann</td><td>KD</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Benjamin Dousa</td><td>M</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Jakob Forssmed</td><td>KD</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer</td><td>M</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>NOTE</strong>: All interpellations have status "Skickad" (sent). No minister responses recorded yet. This reflects the statutory timeline — responses are due April 29 to May 5. Search for anföranden by minister names returned no results, confirming no formal responses have been given in chamber debates yet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes">MCP Cross-Reference Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes">MCP Cross-Reference Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>search_anforanden</code> for minister names (Nina Larsson, Maria Malmer Stenergard) returned 0 results — consistent with "Skickad" status</li>
 <li><code>get_calendar_events</code> returned HTML instead of JSON (API known issue) — debate scheduling cannot be confirmed via API</li>
 <li><code>get_sync_status</code> confirmed live data as of 2026-04-20 07:14 UTC</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Workflow</strong>: <code>news-interpellations</code> (agentic workflow) + reference-class expansion
 <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2 (pass 1 + pass 2 improvement), plus post-review expansion pass
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Document the analytic pipeline, its strengths and limitations, and lessons for future interpellation-debates runs</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pipeline-overview">Pipeline Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pipeline-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pipeline-overview">Pipeline Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pipeline-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Trigger: scheduled agentic workflow] --> B[MCP data pull: riksdag-regering-mcp]
     B --> C[get_interpellationer, rm=2025/26]
@@ -4624,7 +4624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pipeline-overview">Pipeline Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     S --> W[Per-document deep dives 10/10]
     T &#x26; U &#x26; V &#x26; W --> X[Updated artifacts + articles]
     X --> Y[Final review + publish]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources-and-provenance">Data Sources and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-and-provenance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources-and-provenance">Data Sources and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-and-provenance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4685,7 +4685,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-sources-and-provenance">Data Sources and Provenance<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Purpose</th><th>Status</th><th align="center">Confidence grade</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td>Interpellation list, metadata</td><td>✅ Worked</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_dokument_innehall</code></td><td>Full text</td><td>✅ Worked for HD10437, HD10438, HD10435, HD10434, HD10433</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>search_anforanden</code></td><td>Minister response speeches</td><td>✅ Returned 0 results — <strong>confirming no responses yet</strong> (status "Skickad")</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_calendar_events</code></td><td>Chamber scheduling</td><td>⚠️ Returned HTML instead of JSON (known API issue)</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_ledamot</code></td><td>MP details</td><td>✅ Worked</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>world-bank-mcp</code> — economic indicators</td><td>Macro context</td><td>✅ Worked (SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS, NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG, FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_regering</code> (Regeringskansliet)</td><td>Government-side docs</td><td>✅ Worked</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>European Commission DG EMPL</td><td>Directive transposition tracking</td><td>⚠️ External source, not via MCP</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4762,9 +4762,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Technique
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Technique</th><th>Artifact</th><th>Value delivered</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong> (policy-domain + party-strategy)</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code></td><td>Taxonomy of the wave</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Significance scoring</strong> (multi-dimensional)</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td>Ranked prioritisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SWOT</strong> (8-stakeholder)</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td>Perspective coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Risk matrix</strong> (L × I, 1–5)</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td>Quantitative prioritisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat analysis</strong></td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td>Adversarial mapping</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder mapping</strong> (minister × opposition × institutional)</td><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td>Multi-actor view</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-reference / thematic clustering</strong></td><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></td><td>Pattern detection</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ACH</strong> — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>Hypothesis discrimination</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Key Assumptions Check</strong></td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>Bias surface</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Red Team / Devil's Advocate</strong></td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>Alternative-view stress</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scenario analysis</strong> (4 futures, 2-axis morphology)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Uncertainty structuring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Comparative international</strong></td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td>Peer-benchmark</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Per-document deep dives</strong> (10)</td><td><code>documents/*.md</code></td><td>Granular evidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-first-iteration-log">AI-FIRST Iteration Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-first-iteration-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-first-iteration-log">AI-FIRST Iteration Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-first-iteration-log"></a></h3>
 <p>The AI-FIRST principle mandates <strong>minimum 2 complete iterations</strong> with genuine critical re-evaluation between iterations.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute">Pass 1 — Initial generation (~45 minutes of allocated compute)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute">Pass 1 — Initial generation (~45 minutes of allocated compute)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Generated 9 top-level artifacts</li>
 <li>Generated 3 per-document analyses (HD10435, HD10437, HD10438 only — highest significance)</li>
@@ -4781,13 +4781,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute">Pass 1 
 <li>Red Team: partial (in SWOT 'threats' column only)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-20 07:16 UTC<br>
 <strong>Analysis Type</strong>: interpellations<br>
 <strong>Article Date</strong>: 2026-04-20<br>
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26<br>
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: riksdag-regering-mcp (get_interpellationer, get_dokument, get_dokument_innehall, World Bank)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14">Key Documents Analyzed (New Since Last Run 2026-04-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14">Key Documents Analyzed (New Since Last Run 2026-04-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4893,7 +4893,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14">Key Documents A
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs ID</th><th>Titel</th><th>Datum</th><th>Inlämnare</th><th>Mottagare</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>frs 2025/26:438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Sofia Amloh (S)</td><td>Nina Larsson (L)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>frs 2025/26:437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Sofia Amloh (S)</td><td>Nina Larsson (L)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10436</td><td>frs 2025/26:436</td><td>Åtgärder för att stärka den svenska rymdbranschen</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Mats Wiking (S)</td><td>Lotta Edholm (L)</td><td><strong>ÅTERTAGEN</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10435</td><td>frs 2025/26:435</td><td>Mordet på Folke Bernadotte</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Jamal El-Haj (-)</td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>frs 2025/26:434</td><td>Bostadsbyggandet i Stockholmsregionen</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Leif Nysmed (S)</td><td>Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>frs 2025/26:433</td><td>En bred skatteöversyn</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S)</td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>frs 2025/26:432</td><td>Statligt säkerställande av investeringar i vårdbyggnader</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Robert Olesen (S)</td><td>Elisabet Lann (KD)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10431</td><td>frs 2025/26:431</td><td>Internationellt arbete för hbtqi-personers mänskliga rättigheter</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Anna Lasses (C)</td><td>Benjamin Dousa (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td>frs 2025/26:430</td><td>Moskéer som sprider hat och hot</td><td>2026-04-07</td><td>Richard Jomshof (SD)</td><td>Jakob Forssmed (KD)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>frs 2025/26:429</td><td>Skyddet för yttrandefriheten</td><td>2026-04-07</td><td>Rashid Farivar (SD)</td><td>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-response-deadlines">Response Deadlines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-deadlines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-deadlines">Response Deadlines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-deadlines"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4936,8 +4936,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-response-deadlines">Response Deadlines<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Sista svarsdatum</th><th>Days Remaining</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10435</td><td>2026-04-30</td><td>10 days</td><td>🔴 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>2026-04-29</td><td>9 days</td><td>🔴 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>2026-04-29</td><td>9 days</td><td>🔴 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>2026-05-05</td><td>15 days</td><td>🟡 NEAR</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>2026-05-05</td><td>15 days</td><td>🟡 NEAR</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-calendar-api-status">Calendar API Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-api-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-calendar-api-status">Calendar API Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-api-status"></a></h3>
 <p>Calendar API returned HTML instead of JSON (known Riksdagen API issue). ANM date for HD10437/HD10438 is 2026-04-21 (tomorrow).</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10430-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10431-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10432-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10433-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10434-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10435-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10436-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10437-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10438-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -4985,7 +5013,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:05.407Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:26.742Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html b/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html
index d044384388..f93da0db9b 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Interpellation Wave,">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.721Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:27.132Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.721Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:27.132Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-20T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Wave,","description":"Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 15 interpellations across the period — of which 10 are in scope for this analysis (HD10429–HD10438, including one…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:05.721Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10430-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10431-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10432-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10433-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10434-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10435-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10436-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10437-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10438-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Wave,","description":"Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 15 interpellations across the period — of which 10 are in scope for this analysis (HD10429–HD10438, including one…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:27.132Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-interpellations-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10430-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10431-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10432-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10433-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10434-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10435-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10436-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10437-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10438-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -206,10 +206,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Between April 7 and April 17, 2026, the Swedish Riksdag received approximately 15 interpellations across the period — of which <strong>10 are in scope for this analysis</strong> (<code>HD10429–HD10438</code>, including one withdrawal, HD10436). This 10-document set represents the largest concentrated accountability push of riksmöte 2025/26. The decisive signal is that <strong>Sweden will fail to transpose the EU Pay Transparency Directive by its June 7, 2026 deadline</strong>, after the government withdrew its own implementation proposal. This is documented in the official Riksdag record via interpellation 2025/26:437 (HD10437). The Social Democrats (S) are weaponising this failure through a coordinated pre-Election-2026 narrative with two April-17 twin interpellations against Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson (L), five accumulated interpellations against Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD), and an independent MP (El-Haj) pressing Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard (M) on historical Israel accountability with a 10-day response window. <strong>Government response strategy in the April 29–May 5 window will determine whether this wave converts into a durable Election-2026 narrative.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-strategic-findings">Top 5 Strategic Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-strategic-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-strategic-findings">Top 5 Strategic Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-strategic-findings"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p>🔴 <strong>Documented EU-directive transposition failure</strong> (HD10437, sig 9.2/10). Sweden's own withdrawal of its implementation proposal creates an <strong>irrefutable factual record</strong> that S will exploit for 6+ months running up to Election 2026. Government loses rhetorical manoeuvre room.</p>
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-strategic-findings">Top 5 Strategic Findings<a class="" aria-hi
 <p>🟡 <strong>Tactical withdrawal signal</strong> (HD10436, space industry, S/Wiking). Voluntary withdrawal suggests informal government-industry accommodation on strategic industrial policy — a <strong>positive</strong> signal for Nordic space-sector cooperation despite the broader accountability climate.</p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot">Ministerial Accountability Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot">Ministerial Accountability Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -304,14 +304,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-snapshot">Ministerial Accountability Snaps
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Minister</th><th>Party</th><th>Interp. count (active)</th><th>Nearest deadline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Andreas Carlson</td><td>KD</td><td>6+</td><td>April 29 (HD10434)</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Nina Larsson</td><td>L</td><td>2 (coordinated)</td><td>May 5</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>M</td><td>1+1 (HD10426+HD10435)</td><td>April 30 (URGENT)</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabeth Svantesson</td><td>M</td><td>1+1 (HD10433+HD10427)</td><td>April 29</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabet Lann</td><td>KD</td><td>2 (HD10432+HD10415)</td><td>May 5</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>Benjamin Dousa</td><td>M</td><td>1 (HD10431)</td><td>April 28</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>Jakob Forssmed</td><td>KD</td><td>1 (HD10430)</td><td>April 21</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer</td><td>M</td><td>1 (HD10429)</td><td>April 21</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>Lotta Edholm</td><td>L</td><td>0 (HD10436 withdrawn)</td><td>—</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-implications-election-2026">Strategic Implications (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-election-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-implications-election-2026">Strategic Implications (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-election-2026"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S has a campaign spine</strong>: EU directive failure + women's shelters + billionaire tax paradox + housing decline + infrastructure saturation. These themes are mutually reinforcing and give S a coherent narrative arc.</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition fault lines surface</strong>: L minister failing on gender equality (core L brand), KD minister most-targeted (housing/infrastructure), SD applying inverted-expected pressure (HD10429 freedom-of-expression), C differentiating on LGBTQI+ rights (HD10431). The Tidö arrangement is showing strain.</li>
 <li><strong>The June 7 EU deadline is a countdown clock</strong>: S gains one more headline every week Larsson fails to announce implementation progress. The campaign narrative extends naturally into summer.</li>
 <li><strong>Diplomatic exposure</strong>: HD10435 (Bernadotte) forces a Swedish foreign-policy position on Israel that Malmer Stenergard has so far managed to keep general. The three explicit demands (accountability/apology/compensation) prevent general framing.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness">Recommended Government Counter-Moves (for situational awareness)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness">Recommended Government Counter-Moves (for situational awareness)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-recommended-government-counter-moves-for-situational-awareness">Recom
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Neutralising move</th><th>Likely?</th><th>Political cost</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10437 EU directive</td><td>Pre-deadline transposition announcement by May 20</td><td>P=0.35</td><td>Medium (coalition negotiation)</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438 shelters</td><td>Emergency kvinnojour funding package</td><td>P=0.45</td><td>Low–medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434 housing</td><td>PBL reform + construction-loan guarantee</td><td>P=0.30</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433 tax</td><td>Announcement of a targeted review</td><td>P=0.55</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td>HD10435 Bernadotte</td><td>Firm but narrow historical acknowledgement</td><td>P=0.65</td><td>Low (satisfies most expectations)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days">What to Watch (Next 14 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days">What to Watch (Next 14 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>April 21 ANM of HD10437 + HD10438 (chamber announcement)</li>
 <li>April 21 chamber debate on HD10429 (freedom of expression) and HD10430 (mosques)</li>
@@ -364,20 +364,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-what-to-watch-next-14-days">What to Watch (Next 14 days)<a class="" a
 <li>May 5 responses: HD10437 (EU directive), HD10438 (shelters)</li>
 <li>Weekly: Swedish polling (Novus, Sifo, Demoskop) — any S bounce from the coordinated attacks</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line">Bottom Line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line">Bottom Line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line"></a></h3>
 <p>This interpellation wave is the <strong>first clear evidence</strong> of S operating in full pre-election accountability mode. The coordination, the documentary record (EU directive withdrawal, Länsstyrelsen data, El-Haj's three demands), and the clustering of response deadlines in April 29 – May 5 make it operationally significant. The next 14 days will determine whether the government neutralises this pressure or allows it to compound into a durable narrative running to September 2026.</p>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Analysis confidence</strong>: HIGH — Primary sources (MCP full text of HD10437, HD10438, HD10435, HD10434, HD10433), government authority data (Länsstyrelsen Stockholm), World Bank macro indicators
 <strong>Human editorial oversight</strong>: Required before publication (AI_Policy.md)
 <strong>Next update</strong>: 2026-04-29 (post-Carlson-response review)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Analysis Depth</strong>: Deep | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's opposition Social Democrats (S) have entered their most intensive pre-election parliamentary accountability phase, filing 7 of 10 interpellations since April 14 and 2 on the same day (April 17) targeting the same minister (Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson, L) on coordinated gender equality themes. The discovery that Sweden will FAIL to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive on time — after the government withdrew its own implementation proposal (frs 2025/26:437) — represents the most politically significant parliamentary development of the current session. Combined with documented women's shelter closures (frs 2025/26:438), this creates a "gender accountability double bind" that L's liberal minister cannot easily escape. Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD) now faces his 6th+ interpellation, cementing S's "infrastructure failure" narrative. Independent MP Jamal El-Haj's interpellation demanding Israeli accountability for the 1948 assassination of Folke Bernadotte (frs 2025/26:435) carries a 10-day response deadline and will force Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard (M) into the most diplomatically sensitive response of the current session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings">Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings">Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>[HIGH] S coordinates dual gender equality attack</strong>: Amloh files two interpellations on same day targeting same minister (Nina Larsson, L) — frs 2025/26:437 (EU directive failure) + frs 2025/26:438 (women's shelter closures). SISVA both May 5.</p>
@@ -396,20 +396,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-highlights-top-5-findings">Key Highlights (Top 5 Findings)<a clas
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-article-decision">Article Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-article-decision">Article Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Publish</strong>: YES — High newsworthiness<br>
 <strong>Priority</strong>: 1 (Immediate)<br>
 <strong>Recommended Article Type</strong>: Interpellation Debates<br>
 <strong>Analysis Depth Achieved</strong>: Deep (2 passes completed)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>: Sweden Misses EU Pay Equality Deadline as Opposition Mounts Coordinated Pre-Election Accountability Campaign</p>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (SV)</strong>: Sverige missar EU:s lönetransparensdirektiv när oppositionen intensifierar valrörelseoffensiven</p>
 <p><strong>Meta Description (EN)</strong>: S files two coordinated interpellations targeting Gender Minister Nina Larsson on pay transparency failure and women's shelter closures, as parliament enters an intensive accountability phase ahead of 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>: S lämnar in två samordnade interpellationer mot jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson om EU-direktiv och kvinnojourer, medan riksdagen intensifierar granskning inför valet 2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment">Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment">Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -446,14 +446,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment">Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Analysis</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Gender gap</strong></td><td>S's dual filing on gender equality is explicitly pre-election. Women's shelter closures + EU pay directive = powerful combination for 2026</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition vulnerability</strong></td><td>L (liberal) minister presiding over gender equality failures creates L-M-KD coalition tension</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Carlson/KD accountability</strong></td><td>Most-targeted minister in KD is KD's infrastructure minister — KD will need to defend portfolio in election</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Voter salience</strong></td><td>Women's safety (shelters) is top-10 voter issue; housing construction decline affects young voters directly</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Campaign vulnerability</strong></td><td>Government has no easy answer to EU directive failure — factual record established in parliament</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-scenario-implications">Coalition Scenario Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-scenario-implications">Coalition Scenario Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-implications"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Red-Green government (S-led)</strong>: S's interpellation campaign is laying pre-election foundation. EU directive, women's shelters, housing, tax fairness are all coalition-building themes with V and MP [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</li>
 <li><strong>Continued M-KD-SD-L government</strong>: Can win re-election only if they neutralize the accountability narratives. Carlson's portfolio weakness is the most exposed [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</li>
 <li><strong>Centre-right realignment (M + C + L)</strong>: C's LGBTQ+ interpellation (HD10431) positions them as distinct from SD-leaning government. C may differentiate on human rights [LOW confidence 🟥]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-summary">Ministerial Accountability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-summary">Ministerial Accountability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     S[S Oppositionen] -->|frs 437+438 April 17| NL[Nina Larsson L]
     S -->|frs 434 April 15| AC[Andreas Carlson KD]
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-summary">Ministerial Accountability Summar
     style JF fill:#dddddd
     style GS fill:#dddddd</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-note">Data Quality Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-note">Data Quality Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-note"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text available: HD10437, HD10438, HD10435, HD10434, HD10433 (verified via get_dokument)</li>
 <li>Summary data: HD10432, HD10431, HD10430, HD10429</li>
@@ -481,15 +481,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-quality-note">Data Quality Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>World Bank data: Sweden GDP growth 2024 0.82%, unemployment 2025 8.694%, inflation 2024 2.836%</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analytic framework</strong>: Structured Analytic Techniques (SATs) — ACH, Key Assumptions Check, Red Team / Devil's Advocate
 <strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Confidence baseline</strong>: HIGH | <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2</p>
 <p>This document applies three structured analytic techniques to pressure-test the main intelligence judgements about the April 14–17 interpellation wave. It is designed to surface hidden assumptions, force consideration of alternative explanations, and reduce the risk of mirror-imaging or confirmation bias.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Part 1 — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-central-question">Central Question<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-central-question"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Part 1 — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-1--analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-central-question">Central Question<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-central-question"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>What is the primary driver of the observed April 14–17 interpellation wave from S?</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-candidate-hypotheses">Candidate Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-candidate-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-candidate-hypotheses">Candidate Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-candidate-hypotheses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-candidate-hypotheses">Candidate Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Hypothesis</th><th>A priori plausibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1</td><td><strong>Coordinated pre-Election-2026 accountability campaign</strong> — S has moved from reactive opposition to proactive campaign-aligned parliamentary strategy</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>H2</td><td><strong>Opportunistic response to individual policy failures</strong> — No overall coordination; each MP reacting to constituent/sector pressure on policy-by-policy basis</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>H3</td><td><strong>Internal S party-discipline exercise</strong> — New leadership pushing MPs to demonstrate activity; not primarily campaign-driven</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>H4</td><td><strong>Coalition-partner-signal seeking</strong> — S is attempting to probe where the government coalition is internally weakest (testing Tidö fault lines)</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>H5</td><td><strong>Background base-rate noise</strong> — April is a typical high-interpellation month; no special pattern</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-matrix">Evidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-matrix">Evidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-matrix"></a></h4>
 <p>Legend: ✓✓ (strongly supports), ✓ (weakly supports), ✗ (weakly inconsistent), ✗✗ (strongly inconsistent), — (neutral)</p>
 
 
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-evidence-matrix">Evidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th align="center">Weakly inconsistent (✗)</th><th align="center">Strongly inconsistent (✗✗)</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1 Campaign</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>H2 Opportunistic</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">3</td></tr><tr><td>H3 Discipline</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>H4 Fault-line</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>H5 Noise</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-ach-conclusion">ACH Conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-conclusion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ach-conclusion">ACH Conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-conclusion"></a></h4>
 <p>Following Heuer's ACH logic (focus on inconsistency, not consistency):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>H5 "Background noise" is falsified</strong> (6 inconsistencies, including 2 strong). The coordination signals are too dense and too specific to be coincidence.</li>
@@ -691,9 +691,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-ach-conclusion">ACH Conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Final judgement</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The wave is a <strong>coordinated pre-Election-2026 S accountability campaign</strong> (H1), incorporating deliberate coalition-fault-line probing (H4 as component). El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation is a <strong>parallel independent track</strong> that S tolerates but does not coordinate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check">Part 2 — Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check">Part 2 — Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-2--key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 <p>For each major judgement, the underlying assumptions are made explicit and tested for vulnerability.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline">Judgement: "Sweden will miss the EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition deadline"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline">Judgement: "Sweden will miss the EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition deadline"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transposition-deadline"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-judgement-sweden-will-miss-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-transpos
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>A1. The government withdrew its implementation proposal and has not re-submitted</td><td>✅ Verified</td><td>Stated in HD10437 full text; consistent with no proposition in Riksdagen database</td></tr><tr><td>A2. Transposition requires passage of national legislation (not just administrative act)</td><td>✅ Verified</td><td>Directive 2023/970/EU Art. 34 explicitly requires laws, regulations, administrative provisions</td></tr><tr><td>A3. Sweden has no emergency alternative path to compliance by June 7</td><td>⚠️ Partial</td><td>Emergency legislation possible but would require cross-party accord; no signal of such</td></tr><tr><td>A4. EU Commission will treat non-transposition as infringement</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Standard Commission practice; grace period typically 2–4 months</td></tr><tr><td>A5. The interpellation text is accurate on directive content</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Matches published directive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Primary assumptions hold. A3 is the only hedged assumption — emergency legislation is theoretically possible but politically unlikely.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode">Judgement: "S is operating in coordinated pre-election mode"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode">Judgement: "S is operating in coordinated pre-election mode"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-judgement-s-is-operating-in-coordinated-pre-election-mode">Judgement:
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>B1. The Amloh dual-filing is strategic, not coincidental</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Same MP, same day, same minister, related topics — probability of coincidence &#x3C;5%</td></tr><tr><td>B2. S has internal communication coordinating interpellation filings</td><td>⚠️ Cannot directly verify</td><td>Inferred from pattern; consistent with public S party-whip structures</td></tr><tr><td>B3. Election 2026 is a primary strategic driver</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Election date (September 2026) within 5 months; polling proximity</td></tr><tr><td>B4. The tactical withdrawal of HD10436 reflects conscious prioritisation</td><td>⚠️ Moderate</td><td>Alternative: minister provided informal assurance</td></tr><tr><td>B5. The 7-of-10 S share is significantly above baseline</td><td>⚠️ Partial</td><td>Historical S share of interpellations ~40–60%; 70% is elevated but not unprecedented</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: B1, B3 are strong. B2, B4, B5 carry more uncertainty — but their combination remains convergent evidence of coordination.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable">Judgement: "Carlson (KD) is electorally vulnerable"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable">Judgement: "Carlson (KD) is electorally vulnerable"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -802,31 +802,31 @@ <h3 id="rm-judgement-carlson-kd-is-electorally-vulnerable">Judgement: "Carlson (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Test</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C1. Interpellation count correlates with ministerial vulnerability</td><td>⚠️ Partial</td><td>True in expectation; not deterministic</td></tr><tr><td>C2. Housing is top-5 voter concern</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Consistent polling evidence</td></tr><tr><td>C3. Carlson's response quality has been inadequate</td><td>⚠️ Moderate</td><td>Qualitative; requires review of prior responses</td></tr><tr><td>C4. Stockholm is a swing region</td><td>✅ Strong</td><td>Historical SCB election data</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Main argument holds; specific vulnerability depends on C3 which warrants direct verification of prior Carlson interpellation responses (planned for next iteration).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-systemic-assumption-check">Systemic Assumption Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-systemic-assumption-check"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-systemic-assumption-check">Systemic Assumption Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-systemic-assumption-check"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>We assume <strong>S leadership coordinates interpellations</strong>. If this is wrong (e.g., S is more decentralised than modelled), the "campaign" judgement weakens into "spontaneous opportunism" (H2).</li>
 <li>We assume <strong>interpellations convert to electoral advantage</strong>. This requires media amplification and campaign operationalisation — both are plausible but not guaranteed.</li>
 <li>We assume <strong>government responses will be recognisable as "weak" if they are weak</strong>. Media framing can reverse this in either direction.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate">Part 3 — Red Team / Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave">Red Team Position 1: "The government will neutralise the wave"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate">Part 3 — Red Team / Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-part-3--red-team--devils-advocate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave">Red Team Position 1: "The government will neutralise the wave"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-1-the-government-will-neutralise-the-wave"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: The government has the institutional resources and ministerial experience to defuse each interpellation individually. By May 5, Larsson will likely announce a Pay Transparency Directive implementation plan (possibly by interim administrative measure). Svantesson will signal tax review. Carlson will announce a housing package. The wave will peak on April 29–May 5 and then dissipate. By June, it will be last-month news.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) Ministerial experience (Svantesson 3+ years, Strömmer 3+ years); (2) Government can set policy agenda through propositioner; (3) Media cycle is short; (4) Summer recess dampens parliamentary salience.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: This is a <strong>plausible counter-scenario</strong> (P≈0.25). It assumes the government is strategically aware and operationally unified. The counter-counter: the coalition's internal tensions (L minister, KD minister, SD pressure) complicate unified response. But it cannot be dismissed.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand">Red Team Position 2: "S is overplaying their hand"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand">Red Team Position 2: "S is overplaying their hand"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-2-s-is-overplaying-their-hand"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: 15 interpellations in 2 weeks is <strong>too much</strong>. Voters do not distinguish between 5 interpellations and 15 interpellations — both register as "noise." By trying to saturate across housing, gender, tax, foreign policy, healthcare, S risks diluting focus. A tighter, punchier campaign would be more effective. The tactical withdrawal of HD10436 supports this critique: S is now recognising the saturation risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) Voter cognitive bandwidth limits; (2) Media only covers top 2–3 stories per day; (3) HD10436 withdrawal pattern; (4) Historical campaign literature on message discipline.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>Valid critique</strong> but partially mitigated by (a) parallel targeted attacks on individual ministers (Carlson, Larsson) that <em>are</em> focused; (b) the dual-filing choreography which <em>concentrates</em> rather than dilutes attention. The saturation risk is real but currently managed.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire">Red Team Position 3: "El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation will backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire">Red Team Position 3: "El-Haj's Bernadotte interpellation will backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-3-el-hajs-bernadotte-interpellation-will-backfire"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: Sweden's political culture generally avoids open confrontation with allies on historical grievances. El-Haj, as an independent without party backing, lacks institutional weight. The interpellation may attract fringe support but could alienate mainstream voters who view it as excessive. The Foreign Ministry will give a narrow historical-acknowledgement response, and the issue will be parked.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) Swedish mainstream foreign-policy tradition; (2) El-Haj's independent status limits leverage; (3) Israel-Sweden formal relations remain functional; (4) Media may frame as marginal voice.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>Partially valid</strong>. It is likely that the substantive demands will not be met. But the <strong>reputational cost</strong> is not primarily about whether Israel apologises — it is about whether Sweden's foreign minister can articulate a coherent position. Even a "narrow historical acknowledgement" becomes a news event. The Red Team position is too narrow.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative">Red Team Position 4: "The economic context undermines S's narrative"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative">Red Team Position 4: "The economic context undermines S's narrative"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-position-4-the-economic-context-undermines-ss-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Argument</strong>: Sweden's inflation has cooled (2.836% in 2024 from 8.5% in 2023); real wages are recovering; unemployment, while elevated at 8.694%, has structural components unrelated to government policy. By September 2026, economic conditions may have improved enough that accountability narratives appear dated. The government could point to macro stabilisation as counter-evidence.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence supporting</strong>: (1) World Bank data shows cooling inflation; (2) ECB rate cuts expected 2025–2026; (3) Sweden's labour-market structure mean unemployment has cyclical + structural components.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>Valid macroeconomic critique</strong>. S's narrative leans on micro-level failures (housing, shelters, EU compliance) precisely <em>because</em> the macro story is mixed. This is a sophisticated targeting — the macro is harder to attack, so S focuses on verifiable micro-failures. Red Team critique is correct that the macro context is not supportive, but this is <em>why</em> S's strategy is what it is.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-devils-advocate-summary">Devil's Advocate Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-devils-advocate-summary">Devil's Advocate Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-devils-advocate-summary">Devil's Advocate Summary<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Red Team position</th><th>Strength</th><th>Update to main judgement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RT1 — Government neutralises</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Add scenario (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td>RT2 — S overplays</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Qualify: saturation risk is real but managed</td></tr><tr><td>RT3 — El-Haj backfires</td><td>Weak</td><td>No update</td></tr><tr><td>RT4 — Macro undermines narrative</td><td>Valid observation</td><td>Already accounts for it (S targets micro, not macro)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-integrity-checklist">Analytic Integrity Checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-integrity-checklist"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-integrity-checklist">Analytic Integrity Checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-integrity-checklist"></a></h3>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> ACH matrix completed across 5 hypotheses</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> Inconsistency-counting (not consistency-counting) applied</li>
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytic-integrity-checklist">Analytic Integrity Checklist<a class=""
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> No evidence ignored (including counter-evidence)</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> Analytic integrity: conclusions modified by Red Team where warranted</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat">Final Intelligence Judgements (Post-SAT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat">Final Intelligence Judgements (Post-SAT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>[HIGH confidence 🟩] S is operating a <strong>coordinated pre-Election-2026 accountability campaign</strong> (H1, with H4 as component)</li>
 <li>[HIGH confidence 🟩] Sweden will <strong>fail</strong> to transpose EU Pay Transparency Directive by June 7, 2026 unless emergency legislation is enacted</li>
@@ -888,9 +888,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-final-intelligence-judgements-post-sat">Final Intelligence Judgements
 <li>UK Ministry of Defence, <em>Red Teaming Handbook</em> (2021).</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Scoring Framework</strong>: Newsworthiness × Political Impact × Accountability Pressure</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-significance-matrix">Ranked Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-significance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-significance-matrix">Ranked Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -974,18 +974,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-significance-matrix">Ranked Significance Matrix<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Score</th><th>Dimensions</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>HD10437</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:437</td><td><strong>9.2/10</strong></td><td>EU compliance failure, government accountability, election 2026 gender gap</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>HD10435</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:435</td><td><strong>9.0/10</strong></td><td>Diplomatic controversy, historical justice, urgent deadline April 30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>HD10438</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:438</td><td><strong>8.5/10</strong></td><td>Women's safety, closure crisis, direct policy question</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>HD10433</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:433</td><td><strong>7.8/10</strong></td><td>Systemic tax fairness, Sweden's billionaire paradox, pre-election campaign</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>HD10434</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:434</td><td><strong>7.2/10</strong></td><td>Quantified housing decline (900 units), Carlson pressure escalation</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td><strong>HD10432</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:432</td><td><strong>6.5/10</strong></td><td>Healthcare infrastructure investment gap, state role in regional care</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td><strong>HD10431</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:431</td><td><strong>6.0/10</strong></td><td>International LGBTQ+ rights, foreign aid policy coherence</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td><strong>HD10429</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:429</td><td><strong>5.5/10</strong></td><td>Freedom of expression, SD challenging Moderaterna on prop 2025/26:133</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td><strong>HD10430</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:430</td><td><strong>5.2/10</strong></td><td>Mosque hate-speech scrutiny, SD-KD minister accountability</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td><strong>HD10436</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:436</td><td><strong>4.0/10</strong></td><td>WITHDRAWN — signals political negotiation in space policy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-top-finding-narrative">Top Finding Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-finding-narrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-finding-narrative">Top Finding Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-finding-narrative"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY SIGNIFICANCE</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Sweden's social democratic opposition (S) has filed two interpellations on the same day (April 17, 2026) targeting the same minister (Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson, L) on related gender equality topics. Interpellation frs 2025/26:437 reveals that Sweden will FAIL to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive on time after the government withdrew its implementation proposal — a serious EU compliance breach that strengthens S's pre-election narrative on gender equality and European commitment. The simultaneous filing of frs 2025/26:438 on women's shelter closures compounds the pressure by adding a direct human cost dimension: women fleeing domestic violence losing access to crisis shelters.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY SIGNIFICANCE</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Interpellation frs 2025/26:435 (HD10435) by independent MP Jamal El-Haj connecting the 1948 assassination of Folke Bernadotte to contemporary Israeli death penalty legislation carries an unusually close response deadline (April 30, 2026 — 10 days away) and makes three explicit demands for Israeli accountability, diplomatic apology, and financial compensation. This interpellation will test Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard's (M) capacity to maintain Sweden's human rights profile while managing diplomatic relations with Israel.</p>
 <p><strong>TERTIARY SIGNIFICANCE</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The withdrawal of interpellation frs 2025/26:436 on the Swedish space industry by Mats Wiking (S) is politically notable. Withdrawals typically indicate either a negotiated government commitment or tactical repositioning. Given that Sweden's space sector (Kiruna/Esrange) is a key industrial and NATO-adjacent strategic asset, this withdrawal merits monitoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context-relevance">Economic Context Relevance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context-relevance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context-relevance">Economic Context Relevance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context-relevance"></a></h3>
 <p>The following World Bank indicators provide quantitative grounding:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden GDP growth 2024: <strong>0.82%</strong> (down from 5.2% in 2021) — supports tax reform urgency (HD10433) [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]</li>
 <li>Sweden unemployment 2025: <strong>8.694%</strong> (rising trend) — supports labor market/integration interpellations [HIGH confidence 🟩]</li>
 <li>Sweden inflation 2024: <strong>2.836%</strong> (down from 8.5% in 2023) — cost-of-living context for housing (HD10434) [HIGH confidence 🟩]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology">Multi-Dimensional Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology">Multi-Dimensional Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>Each interpellation is scored across <strong>five dimensions</strong> on a 0–10 scale, with weights reflecting political-intelligence priorities. The aggregate is computed as a weighted mean.</p>
 
 
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-multi-dimensional-scoring-methodology">Multi-Dimensional Scoring Meth
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th>What it measures</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Newsworthiness</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Media-framing potential, public interest, sensational element</td></tr><tr><td>Political Impact</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Effect on government policy, coalition dynamics, electoral calculus</td></tr><tr><td>Accountability Pressure</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>How tightly the interpellation constrains ministerial response options</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence Density</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>Volume of verifiable facts in the interpellation text</td></tr><tr><td>Timing Sensitivity</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Proximity of response deadline and policy-clock constraints (e.g., EU directive)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown">Detailed Scoring Breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown">Detailed Scoring Breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1129,22 +1129,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-detailed-scoring-breakdown">Detailed Scoring Breakdown<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th align="center">News</th><th align="center">Pol.Imp</th><th align="center">Acct</th><th align="center">Evid</th><th align="center">Timing</th><th align="center">Weighted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10437</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center"><strong>9.24</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10435</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center">8.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">9.5</td><td align="center"><strong>9.00</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.0</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center"><strong>8.53</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">8.5</td><td align="center">8.0</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center"><strong>7.80</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">6.5</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">6.5</td><td align="center"><strong>6.43</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10431</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">6.5</td><td align="center"><strong>5.90</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">6.0</td><td align="center"><strong>5.60</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">5.5</td><td align="center"><strong>5.30</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10436</td><td align="center">4.0</td><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">2.0</td><td align="center">3.0</td><td align="center">0.0</td><td align="center"><strong>3.35</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-highlights">Dimension Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-highlights"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-highlights">Dimension Highlights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-highlights"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Highest newsworthiness</strong>: HD10437, HD10435 (both 9.5). Documented EU failure + historical-assassination diplomatic demands both have strong media hooks.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest political impact</strong>: HD10437 (9.5). Impacts coalition (L minister), opposition campaign, and EU relations simultaneously.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest accountability pressure</strong>: HD10437, HD10435 (both 9.0). Both interpellations force binary ministerial choices.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest evidence density</strong>: HD10437 (10.0). Directive number, date, deadline, proposal-withdrawal all verifiable in the text.</p>
 <p><strong>Highest timing sensitivity</strong>: HD10435 (9.5). 10-day response window + political urgency.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-grading-of-scores">Confidence Grading of Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-grading-of-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-grading-of-scores">Confidence Grading of Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-grading-of-scores"></a></h3>
 <p>Scores are analyst estimates on a 10-point scale. Inter-rater reliability was not formally measured (single-analyst process), but scores were stress-tested by:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Cross-check against historical interpellations (<em>Statsministerdatabasen</em>, Riksdag records)</li>
 <li>Benchmark against published editorial coverage where available</li>
 <li>Red-Team re-scoring of top-3 documents (no material change)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-historical-context">Comparative Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-historical-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-historical-context">Comparative Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-historical-context"></a></h3>
 <p>The top-scoring interpellation of the 2025/26 session prior to this wave was HD10413 <em>(frs 2025/26:413, energy-supply question to Ebba Busch/KD)</em> at 7.8/10. <strong>HD10437 (9.24) is the highest-scoring interpellation of rm 2025/26 to date.</strong> This alone is a significant political-intelligence signal: the peak accountability pressure of the session has shifted from energy policy to gender equality / EU compliance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-prepost-election-significance-decay">Pre/Post-Election Significance Decay<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prepost-election-significance-decay"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prepost-election-significance-decay">Pre/Post-Election Significance Decay<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prepost-election-significance-decay"></a></h3>
 <p>An interpellation's significance decays differently depending on its type:</p>
 
 
@@ -1184,25 +1184,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-prepost-election-significance-decay">Pre/Post-Election Significance D
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Decay profile</th><th>Example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Documented-failure</strong> type</td><td>Slow decay; value compounds until resolution</td><td>HD10437 — gains value until June 7 deadline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Force-position</strong> type</td><td>Medium decay; peaks at response, then declines</td><td>HD10435 — peaks April 30</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Brand-signalling</strong> type</td><td>Medium decay; stable value over 6–12 months</td><td>HD10429, HD10431</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saturation-targeting</strong> type</td><td>Aggregates with other interpellations</td><td>HD10434 — part of Carlson portfolio attack</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Withdrawn</strong></td><td>Flat but not zero; signals process information</td><td>HD10436 — informational value only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication for Election 2026 campaign planning</strong>: Documented-failure type (HD10437 in particular) should be the <strong>centrepiece</strong> of S's pre-election messaging because its significance grows through summer. Force-position type (HD10435) should be deployed at the April 30 response moment and then retired. Brand-signalling is for steady-state differentiation, not peak moments.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Framework</strong>: Multi-actor perspective analysis</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-minister-perspectives-government-side">Minister Perspectives (Government Side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-perspectives-government-side"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister">Nina Larsson (L — Jämställdhetsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-minister-perspectives-government-side">Minister Perspectives (Government Side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-perspectives-government-side"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister">Nina Larsson (L — Jämställdhetsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nina-larsson-l--jämställdhetsminister"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Under dual coordinated attack from S. Must respond to both frs 2025/26:437 (EU Pay Transparency) and frs 2025/26:438 (women's shelter closures) by May 5.</p>
 <p><strong>Expected Response Strategy</strong>: Larsson will likely argue that (1) the Pay Transparency Directive implementation is complex and quality of Swedish implementation matters more than speed; (2) women's shelters receive support through existing mechanisms, and responsibility is distributed across government. However, the documented withdrawal of the implementation proposal means she cannot dispute the timeline failure on HD10437.</p>
 <p><strong>Vulnerability Assessment</strong>: [HIGH] The withdrawn proposal is a factual record that S will use in election 2026 campaign materials. L as a liberal party claiming gender equality credentials while presiding over directive failure creates internal party contradictions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister">Andreas Carlson (KD — Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister">Andreas Carlson (KD — Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-andreas-carlson-kd--infrastruktur--och-bostadsminister"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Most-targeted minister in rm 2025/26 with 6+ interpellations. Housing/infrastructure portfolio encompasses strategic military bases, regional airports (Torsby/Hagfors via HD10424), emergency airports (Scandinavian Mountain via HD10428), highway safety (Riksväg 62 via HD10418), and now Stockholm housing construction decline (HD10434).</p>
 <p><strong>Expected Response Strategy</strong>: Market-based solutions, municipal responsibility, and long-term planning arguments. However, the breadth of failures documented across his portfolio makes a coherent narrative difficult.</p>
 <p><strong>Vulnerability Assessment</strong>: [HIGH] The cumulative interpellation record creates a pattern narrative that S is actively building. Each response that fails to commit to concrete action becomes another data point.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister">Maria Malmer Stenergard (M — Utrikesminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister">Maria Malmer Stenergard (M — Utrikesminister)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-maria-malmer-stenergard-m--utrikesminister"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Faces the politically sensitive Bernadotte interpellation with an April 30 deadline.</p>
 <p><strong>Expected Response Strategy</strong>: The Swedish government will almost certainly decline to demand compensation and apology from Israel, citing the limitations of diplomatic intervention in historical matters, the complexity of Israel-Sweden relations, and that the 1948 events fall outside current bilateral frameworks. However, the question of Swedish government acknowledgment of Israel's responsibility is harder to evade given that the assassins' identities are documented.</p>
 <p><strong>Vulnerability Assessment</strong>: [MEDIUM] Malmer Stenergard has already publicly criticized Israeli death penalty legislation. She can partially satisfy the interpellation by noting that position, while deflecting the historical demands. The El-Haj interpellation is politically charged but the independent MP has limited parliamentary leverage.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-actor-perspectives">Opposition Actor Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-actor-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor">Socialdemokraterna (S) — Primary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-actor-perspectives">Opposition Actor Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-actor-perspectives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor">Socialdemokraterna (S) — Primary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategy</strong>: Coordinated, thematic interpellation campaign across gender equality, housing, healthcare, and taxation. The dual April 17 filing targeting Larsson signals S's gender equality campaign is entering its intensive phase.</p>
 <p><strong>Key S Actors</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1213,28 +1213,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s--primary-accountability-actor">Socialdemokratern
 <li><strong>Mats Wiking</strong> (frs 2025/26:436): Space industry — <strong>withdrew</strong> interpellation (tactical retreat?)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political Significance</strong>: S's 7 new interpellations since April 14 demonstrate disciplined pre-election strategy, targeting both the government's EU compliance record and domestic welfare failures.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor">Sverigedemokraterna (SD) — Secondary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor">Sverigedemokraterna (SD) — Secondary Accountability Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd--secondary-accountability-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategy</strong>: Two interpellations targeting freedom of expression (frs 2025/26:429 — justice minister Strömmer, M) and mosque oversight (frs 2025/26:430 — social minister Forssmed, KD). SD is operating in its traditional lanes: national identity, freedom of expression, and scrutiny of religious institutions.</p>
 <p><strong>Significance</strong>: The mosque interpellation (HD10430 by Richard Jomshof — senior SD MP) targets a KD minister on an issue where SD and KD have policy differences. This represents intra-coalition pressure rather than opposition-government confrontation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus">Centerpartiet (C) — Targeted International Focus<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus">Centerpartiet (C) — Targeted International Focus<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c--targeted-international-focus"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Anna Lasses</strong> (frs 2025/26:431): LGBTQ+ rights in foreign aid — positions C as a progressive voice on international human rights. This interpellation targets M's development minister Dousa, testing whether the government's foreign aid policy reflects Sweden's human rights commitments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-jamal-el-haj-independent">Jamal El-Haj (Independent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jamal-el-haj-independent"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-jamal-el-haj-independent">Jamal El-Haj (Independent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jamal-el-haj-independent"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Background</strong>: Formerly affiliated with S before leaving the party. Now independent (-). His Bernadotte interpellation is the most detailed and historically ambitious of the period — a 1,500-word document connecting 1948 to 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Significance</strong>: El-Haj's presence as an independent enables him to raise Israel-Palestine issues more directly than S party leadership would sanction. The three explicit demands (accountability, apology, compensation) go further than Swedish government policy.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-institutional-perspectives">Institutional Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-riksdag-chamber">Riksdag Chamber<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-chamber"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-institutional-perspectives">Institutional Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-perspectives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-riksdag-chamber">Riksdag Chamber<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-chamber"></a></h4>
 <p>The announcement (ANM) of frs 2025/26:437 and frs 2025/26:438 is scheduled for April 21, 2026 (tomorrow). This will place gender equality in the parliamentary spotlight immediately.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder">EU Commission (External Stakeholder)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder">EU Commission (External Stakeholder)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-commission-external-stakeholder"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's failure to implement the Pay Transparency Directive on time (frs 2025/26:437) creates a compliance obligation for the Commission. If Sweden does not formally respond, infringement proceedings are available under EU law. The Commission typically grants grace periods before formal action but the political accountability occurs domestically through parliamentary scrutiny.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Horizon</strong>: 14 days (response window) + 5 months (to Election 2026, September 2026)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Morphological scenario construction with key-uncertainty decomposition
 <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2 (pass 1 draft + pass 2 stress-test)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Four alternative futures for the April 29 – May 5 response window and subsequent political dynamics through September 2026. Probabilities are analyst estimates, sum to ~1.0 (minor overlap intentional). Each scenario covers: trigger, pathway, political effect, Election 2026 implication, and observable indicators to discriminate between scenarios early.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology">Key Uncertainties (2-axis morphology)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology">Key Uncertainties (2-axis morphology)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology"></a></h3>
 <p>The scenarios are generated from the <strong>Cartesian product of two decisive uncertainties</strong>:</p>
 <p><strong>Axis A — Government response quality</strong> (April 29 – May 5 window):</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1248,8 +1248,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-uncertainties-2-axis-morphology">Key Uncertainties (2-axis morpho
 </ul>
 <p>The four resulting quadrants define the scenarios.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1">Scenario 1 — "Neutralisation" (A1 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-sustained">Government strong + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-sustained"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1">Scenario 1 — "Neutralisation" (A1 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--neutralisation-a1--b1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-strong--s-sustained">Government strong + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-sustained"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.20</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: By May 5, Larsson announces interim EU Pay Transparency Directive measures by administrative regulation, pending legislation; Svantesson signals a narrow tax review; Carlson announces a SEK 5–10 billion housing/construction-loan guarantee package; the government also announces SEK 100–150 million emergency kvinnojour funding. S continues the campaign with follow-up motions and committee hearings but is deprived of the "inaction" framing.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: The interpellation wave is <strong>converted into policy concessions</strong> rather than electoral momentum. S's campaign is damaged but survives through autumn policy debates. Coalition demonstrates operational effectiveness.</p>
@@ -1267,8 +1267,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-sustained">Government strong + S sustained<a cla
 <li>SD rejection of any housing-subsidy package → intra-coalition block</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1">Scenario 2 — "S Campaign Traction" (A2 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-sustained">Government weak + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-sustained"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1">Scenario 2 — "S Campaign Traction" (A2 × B1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--s-campaign-traction-a2--b1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-weak--s-sustained">Government weak + S sustained<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-sustained"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.35 (MOST LIKELY)</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Ministerial responses are procedural and lack concrete new commitments. Larsson defers Pay Transparency Directive on "complexity" grounds. Svantesson defends 3:12 rules. Carlson cites "market conditions." The government misses the June 7 EU deadline. S operationalises the documented failures into summer campaign material, coordinating with LO and Byggnads. Media coverage frames accountability responses as inadequate.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: The interpellation wave becomes the <strong>spine of S's election campaign narrative</strong>. Each weekly polling release shows marginal S gains. Gender gap voters shift slightly. Carlson becomes a liability KD cannot remove without acknowledging failure.</p>
@@ -1282,8 +1282,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-sustained">Government weak + S sustained<a class="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Why most likely</strong>: Based on (1) historical government responsiveness to interpellations being low; (2) coalition tensions on directive implementation; (3) S's demonstrated coordination capacity; (4) EU deadline's external timing.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2">Scenario 3 — "Fragmentation" (A2 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-dissipated">Government weak + S dissipated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-dissipated"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2">Scenario 3 — "Fragmentation" (A2 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fragmentation-a2--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-weak--s-dissipated">Government weak + S dissipated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-weak--s-dissipated"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.25</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Ministerial responses are weak as in S2, but S fails to sustain coordinated campaign pressure. Summer recess, competing intra-party priorities, or a leadership communication failure dissipate momentum. The interpellation wave peaks on May 5 and fades into ordinary political noise. Media moves to other topics.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: The accountability material is <strong>generated but not exploited</strong>. The government escapes the narrative consequences of its policy failures through opposition inefficiency.</p>
@@ -1297,8 +1297,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-weak--s-dissipated">Government weak + S dissipated<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Why not likely</strong>: S has demonstrated coordination in the April 14–17 filings; fragmentation would be inconsistent with the observed pattern. However, summer recess is a genuine risk factor.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2">Scenario 4 — "Coalition Rupture" (A1 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally">Government strong + S dissipated but coalition fractures internally<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2">Scenario 4 — "Coalition Rupture" (A1 × B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-rupture-a1--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally">Government strong + S dissipated but coalition fractures internally<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: P = 0.10 (TAIL RISK)</p>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Aggressive government response to interpellations (announcing concessions) triggers coalition conflict. SD rejects kvinnojour emergency funding as "welfare expansion." KD rejects EU directive implementation as "Brussels overreach." L insists on firmer gender-equality action. The government becomes visibly divided on multiple axes. S's campaign becomes secondary to coalition drama.</p>
 <p><strong>Political effect</strong>: Government paralysis triggers <strong>confidence crisis</strong>. Possible motion of no confidence if numbers align. Small probability of early election or government reshuffle.</p>
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-government-strong--s-dissipated-but-coalition-fractures-internally">G
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Why low probability</strong>: Coalition has held together through more stressful periods (2023 budget); no trigger event as major as Election 2022 counter-trigger; SD has structural reasons to remain (policy gains vs opposition).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Scenario</th><th>Short name</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Gov strong + S sustained</td><td>Neutralisation</td><td align="center">0.20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Gov weak + S sustained</td><td><strong>S Traction</strong> ⭐</td><td align="center"><strong>0.35</strong></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Gov weak + S dissipated</td><td>Fragmentation</td><td align="center">0.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Gov strong + S dissipated → coalition rupture</td><td>Coalition Rupture</td><td align="center">0.10</td></tr><tr><td>—</td><td>Residual / unmodelled</td><td>—</td><td align="center">0.10</td></tr><tr><td></td><td><strong>Sum</strong></td><td></td><td align="center"><strong>1.00</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-indicators-matrix">Decision Indicators Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-indicators-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-indicators-matrix">Decision Indicators Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-indicators-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>A single indicator grid for rapid scenario discrimination by mid-May 2026:</p>
 
 
@@ -1425,14 +1425,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-indicators-matrix">Decision Indicators Matrix<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator (status by 2026-05-15)</th><th align="center">S1 Neutralise</th><th align="center">S2 Traction</th><th align="center">S3 Fragmentation</th><th align="center">S4 Rupture</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Any new major government proposition on gender equality</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>S press activity weekly post-debate</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition joint public statements</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td></tr><tr><td>Novus polling shift ≥1.5pp to S</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>SD public criticism of coalition partners</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission informal signal on Sweden</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">Mixed</td><td align="center">Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Kvinnojour emergency funding announcement</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✗</td><td align="center">✓ (then blocked)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-judgement">Analytic Judgement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-judgement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-judgement">Analytic Judgement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-judgement"></a></h3>
 <p>The <strong>modal expectation</strong> is S2 "S Traction" at P=0.35, with S3 "Fragmentation" as the most likely alternative at P=0.25. The combined probability of S2 + S3 (weak government response) is <strong>0.60</strong> — the base case is that the government response will be procedural and not neutralising, driven by coalition-internal constraints on issuing concessions.</p>
 <p>The <strong>upside scenario for the government</strong> (S1, P=0.20) requires active coordination between Larsson, Svantesson, Carlson, and SD leadership. This is achievable but not automatic.</p>
 <p>The <strong>tail risk</strong> (S4, P=0.10) is low-probability but high-impact — analysts should monitor SD public criticism as the primary leading indicator.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-reflection">Red Team Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-reflection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-reflection">Red Team Reflection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-reflection"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Could we be over-weighting S2?</em> The coordination pattern is clear, but it is a single observation (one dual-filing). A counter-case would require S to show similar coordination in ≥2 other waves this session. So far, only this wave shows it at such density. Weakening S2 slightly (from 0.40 to 0.35) and redistributing to S3 (0.20 → 0.25) accounts for this.</p>
 <p><em>Could we be under-weighting S4?</em> Coalition tensions have been consistently present but have not produced rupture. P=0.10 is appropriate unless specific trigger events emerge.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-next-update-triggers">Next-Update Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-update-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-update-triggers">Next-Update Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-update-triggers"></a></h3>
 <p>This scenario set should be <strong>re-evaluated</strong> when any of the following occur:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>First ministerial response (April 21 for HD10429, HD10430)</li>
@@ -1448,9 +1448,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-update-triggers">Next-Update Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <strong>Peer-review</strong>: See <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> Red Team for independent challenge
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM — scenarios are probabilistic and depend on decision-maker choices not yet made</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Framework</strong>: Likelihood × Impact (1–5 scale)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (L)</th><th>Impact (I)</th><th>Score (L×I)</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R001</td><td>Sweden formally breaches EU Pay Transparency Directive deadline — infringement proceedings</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td><strong>20</strong></td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>R002</td><td>More women's shelters close before government responds to HD10438 — direct harm to DV victims</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td><strong>20</strong></td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>R003</td><td>Foreign minister fails to address Bernadotte demands by April 30 — diplomatic credibility gap</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R004</td><td>Andreas Carlson unable to arrest housing construction decline — election liability crystallizes</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R005</td><td>Tax legitimacy crisis deepens without reform — erosion of civic trust</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R006</td><td>Hospital infrastructure investment backlog reaches crisis point — patient safety risk</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R007</td><td>S coordination pattern signals broader pre-election campaign — government response coordination fails</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>R008</td><td>SD mosque scrutiny creates religious freedom chilling effect</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>R009</td><td>Freedom of expression debate on prop 2025/26:133 escalates</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td>R010</td><td>Withdrawn interpellation (HD10436/space) signals unresolved industry concerns</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>4</strong></td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard">Ministerial Accountability Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard">Ministerial Accountability Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1615,21 +1615,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-ministerial-accountability-scorecard">Ministerial Accountability Scor
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Minister</th><th>Party</th><th>Interpellations (Active)</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Accountability Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson</strong></td><td>KD (Infrastruktur/Bostadsminister)</td><td>6+</td><td>Medium (April 30)</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL — Most-targeted minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson</strong></td><td>L (Jämställdhetsminister)</td><td>2 new (HD10437, HD10438)</td><td>Near (May 5)</td><td>🔴 HIGH — Dual coordinated attack</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td>M (Utrikesminister)</td><td>1 urgent (HD10435)</td><td>URGENT (April 30)</td><td>🔴 HIGH — Diplomatic dimension</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson</strong></td><td>M (Finansminister)</td><td>1+ (HD10433)</td><td>Near (April 29)</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elisabet Lann</strong></td><td>KD (Sjukvårdsminister)</td><td>1 (HD10432)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Benjamin Dousa</strong></td><td>M (Bistånds-/utrikeshandelsminister)</td><td>1 (HD10431)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟡 ELEVATED</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Jakob Forssmed</strong></td><td>KD (Socialminister)</td><td>1 (HD10430)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer</strong></td><td>M (Justitieminister)</td><td>1 (HD10429)</td><td>Pending</td><td>🟢 MODERATE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators">Forward Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5">Immediate (0–14 days, before May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators">Forward Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5">Immediate (0–14 days, before May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-immediate-014-days-before-may-5"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Response to frs 2025/26:435 (Bernadotte) by April 30 — diplomatic/historical justice test</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Response to frs 2025/26:434 (Stockholm housing) by April 30 — Carlson accountability</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Response to frs 2025/26:433 (tax reform) by April 29 — Svantesson legitimacy</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Announcement of HD10437/HD10438 announced in chamber April 21 (tomorrow)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-medium-term-26-weeks">Medium-term (2–6 weeks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-term-26-weeks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-medium-term-26-weeks">Medium-term (2–6 weeks)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-term-26-weeks"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> EU Commission reaction to Sweden's failure on Pay Transparency Directive</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> Potential vote of no confidence against targeted minister if interpellation debate reveals gaps</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" disabled> S campaign integration of interpellation themes into election 2026 messaging</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-risk-context">Economic Risk Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-risk-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-risk-context">Economic Risk Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-risk-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-risk-context">Economic Risk Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th><th>Direction</th><th>Risk Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden unemployment (2025)</td><td>8.694%</td><td>↑ Rising</td><td>Labor market stress supports HD10422/HD10421 criticism</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden GDP growth (2024)</td><td>0.82%</td><td>↓ Low</td><td>Economic weakness fuels tax reform urgency (HD10433)</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden housing starts (Stockholm 2026)</td><td>~11,091</td><td>↓ -900</td><td>Confirms HD10434 data — Carlson's failure quantified</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden inflation (2024)</td><td>2.836%</td><td>↓ Cooling</td><td>Cost of living stabilizing but structural issues remain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government">Risk Treatment Options (for Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government">Risk Treatment Options (for Government)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-treatment-options-for-government">Risk Treatment Options (for Go
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Mitigate</th><th>Transfer</th><th>Avoid</th><th>Accept</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R001 EU directive</td><td>Announce interim measures; introduce emergency legislation</td><td>Not transferable (Sweden is obligated party)</td><td>Would require EU derogation; not available</td><td>Ministerial choice with ~6 months of S narrative exploitation</td></tr><tr><td>R002 Shelters</td><td>Emergency funding package (SEK 50–150m); <em>länsstyrelser</em> administered</td><td>Partial transfer to <em>regioner</em></td><td>Not politically feasible</td><td>Ministerial choice with severe reputational cost</td></tr><tr><td>R003 Bernadotte</td><td>Narrow historical acknowledgement statement</td><td>—</td><td>Would require refusing to respond (not allowed)</td><td>Low-cost if framed carefully</td></tr><tr><td>R004 Carlson housing</td><td>Construction-loan guarantee expansion; PBL revision</td><td>To Boverket / regional planners</td><td>Not feasible given data exposure</td><td>High political cost</td></tr><tr><td>R005 Tax</td><td>Targeted review announcement (e.g., 3:12 committee)</td><td>—</td><td>Defensible but exposes ideology</td><td>Moderate political cost</td></tr><tr><td>R006 Hospitals</td><td>State co-investment mechanism</td><td>To regions (current)</td><td>—</td><td>Structural; hard to neutralise in short term</td></tr><tr><td>R007 Coordination signal</td><td>Coalition strategic communications</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Requires active coalition coherence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-risk-indicators-kris">Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk-indicators-kris"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-risk-indicators-kris">Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk-indicators-kris"></a></h3>
 <p>Leading indicators to monitor between now and the summer recess:</p>
 
 
@@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-risk-indicators-kris">Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KRI</th><th>Trigger threshold</th><th>Monitored via</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KRI-1: Novus S-polling ≥32%</td><td>Crossed</td><td>Novus, Sifo, Demoskop weekly</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-2: L-polling below 4% threshold</td><td>L &#x3C;4.0% sustained 3 weeks</td><td>Polling aggregators</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-3: EU Commission letter on Sweden transposition</td><td>Any correspondence</td><td>Commission DG EMPL releases</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-4: Additional kvinnojour closures announced</td><td>Any new closure in media</td><td>Civil-society monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-5: Carlson public approval</td><td>Below 30% sustained 4 weeks</td><td>Demoskop ministerial ratings</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-6: SD public criticism of coalition partners</td><td>Any Åkesson / Jomshof public statement</td><td>Social media + press</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-7: Coalition internal-meeting cadence</td><td>Fewer than weekly</td><td>Regeringskansliet kalender</td></tr><tr><td>KRI-8: S motion of no confidence discussion</td><td>Any credible leak</td><td>Parliamentary journalists</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-escalation-triggers">Escalation Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-escalation-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-escalation-triggers">Escalation Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-escalation-triggers"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier 1 (government must respond within 24h)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>EU Commission formal notice on Pay Transparency Directive</li>
@@ -1801,14 +1801,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-escalation-triggers">Escalation Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>Trade union public pressure</li>
 <li>Opposition committee-hearing requests</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register-evolution">Risk Register Evolution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-evolution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register-evolution">Risk Register Evolution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-evolution"></a></h3>
 <p>This risk register replaces the previous interpellation-wave register (2026-04-13) and is the active register until the next wave analysis. Key changes:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>R001 elevated from score 15 (previous) to 20 (this update) following full-text analysis of HD10437</li>
 <li>R004 Carlson elevated from score 12 to 16 following 6th-interpellation saturation signal</li>
 <li>R010 (withdrawn-space) added as new low-severity register entry for tracking</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-residual-risk-assessment">Residual Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-residual-risk-assessment">Residual Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Even with optimal government risk-treatment, residual risks remain:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10437: Transposition after June 7 is still transposition failure; residual political cost ≥3/5 severity</li>
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-residual-risk-assessment">Residual Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>HD10434: Even with a construction package, 2026 numbers are already set; residual ≥3/5</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Overall residual risk posture</strong>: 🟧 ELEVATED. The interpellation wave has raised the session risk baseline and will not fully dissipate even with strong government responses.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain">Risk Ownership and Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain">Risk Ownership and Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-ownership-and-accountability-chain">Risk Ownership and Accountab
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Primary owner</th><th>Secondary owner</th><th>Executive accountability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R001 EU directive</td><td>Larsson (L)</td><td>Strömmer (M)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R002 Shelters</td><td>Larsson (L)</td><td>Forssmed (KD)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R003 Bernadotte</td><td>Malmer Stenergard (M)</td><td>—</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R004 Housing</td><td>Carlson (KD)</td><td>Svantesson (M)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R005 Tax</td><td>Svantesson (M)</td><td>Carlson (KD)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R006 Hospitals</td><td>Lann (KD)</td><td>Svantesson (M)</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr><tr><td>R007 Coordination</td><td>Regeringskansliet strategic communications</td><td>All ministers</td><td>PM Kristersson</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-review-cadence">Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-review-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-review-cadence">Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-review-cadence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Daily monitoring of KRIs during April 29 – May 5 window</li>
 <li>Weekly review during May 6 – June 7</li>
@@ -1879,11 +1879,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-review-cadence">Review Cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Quarterly review until Election 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Focus</strong>: Parliamentary Accountability — April 14–17 Wave</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix">Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public">1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General Public)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix">Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public">1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General Public)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1954,7 +1954,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens-väljare--general-public">1. CITIZENS (Väljare / General
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Safety net infrastructure intact — question rights formally documented</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438 — parlamentarisk fråga ställd</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>Public accountability</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Formal democratic channel functioning — 438 interpellations filed in rm 2025/26</td><td>Total interpellation count, MCP data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Democratic health</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Women's shelters closing nationwide — direct safety risk</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438 — "många kvinnojourer runt om i landet läggs ned"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Tax system unfair perception — labor taxed heavily vs capital</td><td>frs 2025/26:433 HD10433 — "avsevärt lägre skatt än vanliga löntagare"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Housing access deteriorating — 900 fewer Stockholm homes planned in 2026</td><td>frs 2025/26:434 HD10434 — Länsstyrelsen Stockholm data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Pay gap closure possible via EU directive — if government acts</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — EU directive mechanism exists</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Aging hospital infrastructure creating care gaps — 1960s buildings</td><td>frs 2025/26:432 HD10432 — hospital investment crisis</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l">2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l">2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-kd-sd-l">2. GOVERNMENT COALITION (M, KD, SD,
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Formal responses can demonstrate competence if handled well</td><td>Response deadlines documented: SISVA April 29–May 5</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+4/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>HD10436 withdrawn — suggests space industry issue resolved bilaterally</td><td>frs 2025/26:436 status: "Återtagen"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive implementation proposal WITHDRAWN by government</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — government withdrew proposal</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Andreas Carlson (KD) is parliament's most-targeted minister — 6+ interpellations on infrastructure</td><td>HD10434, HD10428, HD10425, HD10424, HD10418, HD10417</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Nina Larsson (L) simultaneously targeted on two gender equality failures</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 + frs 2025/26:438 same day</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Moderate responses can reframe interpellations as routine scrutiny</td><td>Standard parliamentary process</td><td>[LOW] 🟥</td><td>+3/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Response to HD10435 (Bernadotte) requires diplomatic precision vs Israel</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 deadline April 30, 2026</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent">3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C dissent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent">3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C dissent)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp--c-dissent">3. OPPOSITION BLOC (S, V, MP + C
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>S filed 7 of 10 recent interpellations — disciplined pre-election accountability campaign</td><td>Analysis of interpellation filers, MCP data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+8/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>S coordinated dual filing on April 17 targeting same minister on related topics</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 + frs 2025/26:438 filed same day</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>EU compliance failure is documented — government cannot easily rebut factual record</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 — "Sverige kommer inte att lyckas implementera direktivet i tid"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Bernadotte interpellation (El-Haj, independent) could backfire if perceived as partisan</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 — El-Haj is independent, not party-affiliated</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-3/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Five interpellations with SISVA April 29–May 5 create accountability window before spring recess</td><td>Response deadlines clustered</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>If ministers respond effectively, parliamentary attention may shift away</td><td>Risk of deflection in responses</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-4/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv">4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv">4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2143,7 +2143,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-business--industry-näringsliv">4. BUSINESS / INDUSTRY (Näringsliv
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Tax certainty debate may clarify investment environment</td><td>frs 2025/26:433 HD10433</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+4/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Housing construction decline (-900 units in Stockholm 2026) affects workforce planning</td><td>frs 2025/26:434 HD10434 — Länsstyrelsen data</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive delay creates legal uncertainty for employers</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — compliance uncertainty</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Space industry interpellation withdrawn — signals government-industry dialogue active</td><td>frs 2025/26:436 withdrawn</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Sweden unemployment at 8.694% (2025, World Bank) — rising trend hurts productivity</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. CIVIL SOCIETY (Civilsamhälle)<a c
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Women's shelters (idéburna organisationer) formally defended in parliament</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>LGBTQ+ rights internationally defended via C's interpellation</td><td>frs 2025/26:431 HD10431</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Government failures to fund women's shelters threaten sector viability</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 — "stora konsekvenser för möjligheten att lämna en våldsam relation"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-9/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Mosque scrutiny (HD10430) may create chilling effect on religious organizations</td><td>frs 2025/26:430 HD10430 — SD mosque targeting</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-5/10</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Parliamentary pressure may trigger emergency government action on shelter funding</td><td>Accountability mechanism working</td><td>[LOW] 🟥</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Hospital infrastructure crisis without state guarantee endangers community care access</td><td>frs 2025/26:432 HD10432</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. INTERNATIONAL / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. INTERNATIONAL / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. INTERNATIONAL / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Sweden still formally committed to EU directive frameworks</td><td>Multiple EU directives referenced</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+4/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Sweden will MISS EU Pay Transparency Directive deadline — constitutional obligations</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437 — "Sverige kommer inte att lyckas implementera direktivet i tid"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-8/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Swedish foreign policy on Israel/Palestine under parliamentary pressure</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 HD10435 — Bernadotte/Malmer Stenergard</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Bernadotte interpellation creates opportunity for Sweden to lead on historical justice</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 — three explicit demands for apology/compensation</td><td>[LOW] 🟥</td><td>+5/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Swedish foreign minister must balance Israel relations with LGBTQ/human rights portfolio</td><td>frs 2025/26:431 + frs 2025/26:435 combined</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2316,7 +2316,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. JUDICIARY / CONSTITUTIONAL<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Constitutional freedom of expression tradition formally invoked</td><td>frs 2025/26:429 HD10429 — "Sverige har en stolt och i många avseenden unik tradition"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>Proposition 2025/26:133 (unnamed in interpellation) may compromise press freedom — SD challenge</td><td>frs 2025/26:429 HD10429</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-7/10</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>El-Haj interpellation on Bernadotte cites failure to hold Israeli murderers accountable — 78 years unresolved</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 HD10435 — "Ingen dömdes någonsin"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>-6/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Parliamentary scrutiny of executive compliance with EU law creates constitutional accountability</td><td>EU directive obligation</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Tax system inequality documented in interpellation creates legitimacy crisis risk</td><td>frs 2025/26:433 HD10433</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-5/10</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2372,14 +2372,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. MEDIA / PUBLIC OPINION<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (frs ID/dok_id)</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Entry Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Bernadotte interpellation offers compelling historical narrative with contemporary resonance</td><td>frs 2025/26:435 HD10435 — "ett av de mest uppmärksammade politiska attentaten"</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+7/10</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Women's shelter closures are highly media-ready story — human interest + policy failure</td><td>frs 2025/26:438 HD10438</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+8/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive failure is a complex story — may require media simplification</td><td>frs 2025/26:437 HD10437</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-3/10</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O</strong></td><td>Six interpellations with deadlines in 9–15 days creates "countdown" media narrative</td><td>Response deadline analysis</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>+6/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T</strong></td><td>Mosque/freedom of expression interpellations (SD) may dominate coverage vs. substantive S issues</td><td>frs 2025/26:430 + frs 2025/26:429</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td><td>-5/10</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH overall (MCP live data, full text documents)<br>
 <strong>Threat Level</strong>: 🔴 HIGH — Multiple active accountability threats with near-term response deadlines</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview-threat-assessment">Overview Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview-threat-assessment">Overview Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliament is entering an intensive pre-election accountability phase with 8 active interpellations across 8 ministers, 5 response deadlines clustering in the April 29 – May 5 window, and documented government policy failures that the opposition is systematically exploiting ahead of the 2026 general election.</p>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level: HIGH</strong> | Confidence: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437">Threat 1: EU Pay Transparency Directive Breach (frs 2025/26:437)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437">Threat 1: EU Pay Transparency Directive Breach (frs 2025/26:437)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Socialdemokraterna), Interpellation Sofia Amloh<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Sweden's government withdrew its implementation proposal for the EU Pay Transparency Directive. Sweden will miss the transposition deadline. This creates:</p>
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-1-eu-pay-transparency-directive-breach-frs-202526437">Threat 1
 <strong>Probability</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Government's own withdrawal of proposal is documented evidence<br>
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response due May 5, 2026; EU transposition deadline June 7, 2026 (48 days away as of analysis date)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438">Threat 2: Women's Shelter Closure Crisis (frs 2025/26:438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438">Threat 2: Women's Shelter Closure Crisis (frs 2025/26:438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Socialdemokraterna), Interpellation Sofia Amloh<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Women's shelters (kvinnojourer) closing nationwide due to funding crisis. Direct consequence: women cannot safely leave violent relationships. The interpellation documents this as an institutional failure of the government's anti-violence strategy.</p>
@@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-2-womens-shelter-closure-crisis-frs-202526438">Threat 2: Women
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Crisis ongoing; response deadline May 5, 2026</p>
 <p><strong>Connection to Threat 1</strong>: Both HD10437 and HD10438 target the same minister on the same day — this is a coordinated S parliamentary strategy, not coincidence. By doubling the pressure in one day, S forces Larsson to respond to both gender equality crises simultaneously.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435">Threat 3: Diplomatic Accountability — Bernadotte/Israel (frs 2025/26:435)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435">Threat 3: Diplomatic Accountability — Bernadotte/Israel (frs 2025/26:435)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: Independent MP Jamal El-Haj (formerly S)<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Utrikesminister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Three-part demand: (1) Swedish government to require Israel to accept responsibility for 1948 Bernadotte assassination; (2) formal public apology to Bernadotte family; (3) financial compensation. The interpellation explicitly links the 1948 murder to current Israeli death penalty legislation and its application against Palestinians.</p>
@@ -2410,7 +2410,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-3-diplomatic-accountability--bernadotteisrael-frs-202526435">T
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response deadline April 30, 2026 — URGENT (10 days remaining)<br>
 <strong>Complexity</strong>: El-Haj is independent (-) after leaving S over Israel/Palestine disagreements. This creates an unusual dynamic where a former S member makes the most politically charged foreign policy intervention of the session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434">Threat 4: Infrastructure Minister Accountability Saturation (frs 2025/26:434)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434">Threat 4: Infrastructure Minister Accountability Saturation (frs 2025/26:434)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526434"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Leif Nysmed)<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Andreas Carlson (KD, Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Stockholm housing construction declining by ~900 units vs 2025 (11,091 vs ~12,000 planned starts). This is Carlson's 6th+ interpellation this session. Each new interpellation compounds reputational damage and narrows his room to claim policy success.</p>
@@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-4-infrastructure-minister-accountability-saturation-frs-202526
 <strong>Probability</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Statistics confirmed by Länsstyrelsen Stockholm<br>
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response deadline April 29, 2026 — 9 days</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433">Threat 5: Government Tax Reform Resistance (frs 2025/26:433)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433">Threat 5: Government Tax Reform Resistance (frs 2025/26:433)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Threat Actor</strong>: S (Ida Ekeroth Clausson)<br>
 <strong>Target</strong>: Finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)<br>
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: The interpellation exposes the fundamental paradox of Sweden's tax system: highest density of billionaires per capita globally while labor income is taxed heavily. Rising inequality, capital-labor tax disparity, and social contract legitimacy questioned.</p>
@@ -2426,7 +2426,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-5-government-tax-reform-resistance-frs-202526433">Threat 5: Go
 <strong>Probability</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Structural condition documented by interpellation<br>
 <strong>Timeline</strong>: Response deadline April 29, 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Confidence Level</th><th>Evidence Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Threat 1 (EU directive)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Government's own withdrawal of proposal (documented in frs 2025/26:437)</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 2 (women's shelters)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>"Faktum" stated in frs 2025/26:438 full text</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 3 (Bernadotte)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Full text frs 2025/26:435, response deadline documented</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 4 (housing)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Länsstyrelsen Stockholm quantified data in frs 2025/26:434</td></tr><tr><td>Threat 5 (tax reform)</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td><td>Systemic analysis in frs 2025/26:433 full text</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-actor-profiling">Threat Actor Profiling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-actor-profiling"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor">TA-1: Social Democrats (S) — Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-actor-profiling">Threat Actor Profiling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-actor-profiling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor">TA-1: Social Democrats (S) — Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Institutional opposition party; tier-1 threat actor
 <strong>Capability</strong>: High — 107 MPs, professional party apparatus, coordinated whip system, union affiliations (LO, TCO), media reach
 <strong>Intent</strong>: HIGH — explicit pre-Election 2026 accountability campaign
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ta-1-social-democrats-s--primary-threat-actor">TA-1: Social Democrats
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Description</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Initial access (agenda-setting)</td><td>Interpellation filing creates documentary record</td><td>7 of 10 wave interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>Persistence</td><td>Multiple interpellations same minister (Carlson saturation)</td><td>6+ Carlson interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>Privilege escalation</td><td>Dual-filing same day to force compound response</td><td>HD10437+HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>Defence evasion</td><td>Use of government-source data (Länsstyrelsen, EU directive text) to deny minister rhetorical escape</td><td>HD10437, HD10434</td></tr><tr><td>Lateral movement</td><td>Thematic coordination across policy domains (gender→housing→tax)</td><td>Wave structure</td></tr><tr><td>Collection</td><td>Creating documentary record of ministerial answers for campaign use</td><td>Standard practice</td></tr><tr><td>Command &#x26; control</td><td>Party-whip coordination of filing timing</td><td>Dual-filing on April 17</td></tr><tr><td>Exfiltration</td><td>Operationalising into election-campaign messaging</td><td>Expected post-May 5</td></tr><tr><td>Impact</td><td>Electoral gain through accumulated narrative</td><td>To be assessed post-September 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor">TA-2: Sweden Democrats (SD) — Secondary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor">TA-2: Sweden Democrats (SD) — Secondary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Coalition external supply party; tier-2 threat actor (asymmetric)
 <strong>Capability</strong>: Medium–High (72 MPs, coalition arrangement-based leverage)
 <strong>Intent</strong>: MEDIUM — agenda-setting and brand-signalling more than direct government-toppling
@@ -2537,18 +2537,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-ta-2-sweden-democrats-sd--secondary-threat-actor">TA-2: Sweden Democr
 <li><strong>Balanced attack</strong> (HD10429 + HD10430 — both liberty expansion and restriction depending on subject)</li>
 <li><strong>Agenda visibility maintenance</strong> — keeping religious-extremism issues in public view</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor">TA-3: Jamal El-Haj (Independent) — Wildcard Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor">TA-3: Jamal El-Haj (Independent) — Wildcard Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-3-jamal-el-haj-independent--wildcard-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Individual independent MP; tier-2 threat actor (institutional weight limited; asymmetric impact potential high)
 <strong>Capability</strong>: Low in raw numbers; high in diaspora-community mobilisation
 <strong>Intent</strong>: HIGH on Israel/Palestine accountability
 <strong>Opportunity</strong>: HIGH — 10-day response window, media-ready narrative</p>
 <p><strong>TTPs</strong>: Single-issue concentrated pressure; using independent platform to make demands party-affiliated MPs cannot</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor">TA-4: Centerpartiet (C) — Tier-3 Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor">TA-4: Centerpartiet (C) — Tier-3 Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ta-4-centerpartiet-c--tier-3-actor"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: External supply party; tier-3
 <strong>Capability</strong>: 24 MPs; moderate
 <strong>Intent</strong>: Brand-differentiation more than government-opposition
 <strong>TTPs</strong>: Selective issue-championing (HD10431 LGBTQI+)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-landscape-matrix">Threat Landscape Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-landscape-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-landscape-matrix">Threat Landscape Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-landscape-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>        High Impact
              |
      TA-1 (S)● ───── ●TA-3 (El-Haj)
@@ -2561,17 +2561,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-landscape-matrix">Threat Landscape Matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
              └──────────────────→
           Low Intent     High Intent
 </code></pre>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-compound-effects">Threat Compound Effects<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-compound-effects"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-compound-effects">Threat Compound Effects<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-compound-effects"></a></h3>
 <p>Individual threats are analytically meaningful; <strong>compound effects</strong> may be greater than the sum:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438">Compound Effect 1: Dual-gender attack (HD10437 + HD10438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438">Compound Effect 1: Dual-gender attack (HD10437 + HD10438)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-1-dual-gender-attack-hd10437--hd10438"></a></h4>
 <p>Same day, same MP, same minister. Impact: forces Larsson to formulate a response that addresses both EU compliance <em>and</em> service-delivery failure — under constrained time. Impact multiplier: ~1.6x single-interpellation pressure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active">Compound Effect 2: Carlson saturation (HD10434 + 5 other active)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active">Compound Effect 2: Carlson saturation (HD10434 + 5 other active)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-2-carlson-saturation-hd10434--5-other-active"></a></h4>
 <p>Cumulative policy-area coverage. Impact: no "safe" portfolio retreat. Impact multiplier: ~2x single-interpellation pressure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters">Compound Effect 3: Fiscal-social attack (HD10433 tax + HD10437 gender + HD10432 hospitals + HD10438 shelters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters">Compound Effect 3: Fiscal-social attack (HD10433 tax + HD10437 gender + HD10432 hospitals + HD10438 shelters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-3-fiscal-social-attack-hd10433-tax--hd10437-gender--hd10432-hospitals--hd10438-shelters"></a></h4>
 <p>Constructs a unified "government failing working families" narrative. Impact multiplier: ~1.3x — dilutes focus but reinforces frame.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty">Compound Effect 4: Foreign-policy stress (HD10435 + HD10426 Israel death penalty)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty">Compound Effect 4: Foreign-policy stress (HD10435 + HD10426 Israel death penalty)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compound-effect-4-foreign-policy-stress-hd10435--hd10426-israel-death-penalty"></a></h4>
 <p>Multiple Israel-related accountability moments. Impact multiplier: ~1.2x — keeps foreign-policy-accountability in news.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities">Government Counter-Threat Capabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities">Government Counter-Threat Capabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-government-counter-threat-capabilities">Government Counter-Threat Cap
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Capability</th><th>Current strength</th><th align="center">Deployment likelihood</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ministerial rhetorical skill</td><td>HIGH (Svantesson, Strömmer, Malmer Stenergard)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Policy announcement / concession</td><td>MEDIUM (coalition constraints)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition coordination</td><td>MEDIUM–HIGH (2+ years operation)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Counter-narrative deployment</td><td>MEDIUM (government PR)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative agenda control</td><td>HIGH (parliamentary majority)</td><td align="center">N/A for interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>EU-level coordination</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (on HD10437)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Government has significant counter-threat capabilities but is constrained by coalition internal dynamics. The most likely counter-move is ministerial rhetorical skill + targeted concessions (see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version">Threat Intelligence Indicators (IoCs) — Political-Domain Version<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version">Threat Intelligence Indicators (IoCs) — Political-Domain Version<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2661,11 +2661,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-intelligence-indicators-iocs--political-domain-version">Threat
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator type</th><th>Examples</th><th align="center">Watch priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Filing pattern IoC</strong></td><td>Repeated same-MP same-day same-minister filings</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Language IoC</strong></td><td>Phrase patterns in ministerial responses ("pågående arbete" = holding pattern)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Calendar IoC</strong></td><td>Response-deadline clustering</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media IoC</strong></td><td>Coordinated op-ed timing with LO/TCO amplification</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Polling IoC</strong></td><td>≥1.5pp shift after debate cycle</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coalition IoC</strong></td><td>Public statements by one coalition partner about another</td><td align="center">HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Withdrawal IoC</strong></td><td>Interpellation withdrawals (information-value signal)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-horizon">Threat Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-horizon">Threat Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-horizon"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current horizon (0–14 days)</strong>: All 10 interpellations in active-response phase. Threat level peaks May 5.</p>
 <p><strong>Medium horizon (14–90 days)</strong>: EU Commission June 7 deadline. Summer recess (typically late June). Polling stabilisation. Government policy announcements.</p>
 <p><strong>Long horizon (90+ days)</strong>: Election 2026 campaign formal launch (August 2026). Interpellation narrative absorbed into campaign messaging. Post-election government formation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Internal S communications</strong>: Coordination structure is inferred, not observed</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition backchannel discussions</strong>: Government coalition internal meetings not observed</li>
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>EU Commission informal communications</strong>: Not directly observable</li>
 <li><strong>Union-campaign coordination</strong>: LO/TCO strategic planning not transparent</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment">Analyst Confidence in Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment">Analyst Confidence in Threat Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Threat identification: HIGH 🟩 (primary-source interpellation text available for tier-1 threats)</li>
 <li>Threat actor capability: HIGH 🟩</li>
@@ -2684,19 +2684,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-analyst-confidence-in-threat-assessment">Analyst Confidence in Threat
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10429">HD10429<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10429"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10429 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:429
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-07 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 5.5/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Rashid Farivar (SD) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Justitieminister Gunnar Strömmer (M)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-21</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Rashid Farivar (SD) interpellates Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M) on freedom-of-expression protections in relation to government proposition <strong>2025/26:133</strong>. The interpellation opens with an explicit invocation of Sweden's constitutional heritage: <em>"Sverige har en stolt och i många avseenden unik tradition av att värna det fria ordet. Redan 1766 fick vi världens första grundlagsskyddade tryckfrihet"</em> — Sweden's 1766 <em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> is the oldest press-freedom constitutional act in the world. The rhetorical frame positions SD as the guardian of this tradition against alleged government overreach.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vad avser ministern att göra för att säkerställa att propositionen 2025/26:133 inte leder till en försvagning av tryck- och yttrandefriheten i Sverige?"
 (<em>"What does the minister intend to do to ensure that proposition 2025/26:133 does not lead to a weakening of press and freedom of expression in Sweden?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is an <strong>inverted-expected interpellation</strong>. SD is typically positioned as favouring stronger law-enforcement/speech-limitation measures. Here, SD is interpellating on <strong>press-freedom</strong> grounds — positioning themselves as <strong>defenders of expression rights</strong> against their own coalition's proposition. This is tactically sophisticated:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Rebuts critiques that SD is anti-free-speech</li>
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<
 <li>Must defend prop 2025/26:133 personally</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Coalition-dynamic signal</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Two SD interpellations in one week (HD10429 + HD10430) — one on expression rights against M, one on religious extremism against KD. This is <strong>balanced pressure</strong> across the coalition: SD is simultaneously demanding more liberty (HD10429) and more restriction (HD10430), depending on subject. The pattern reinforces SD's brand as the <strong>"agenda-setter"</strong> within the coalition without appearing ideologically contradictory.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-constitutional-law-dimension">Constitutional-Law Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-law-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-constitutional-law-dimension">Constitutional-Law Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-law-dimension"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩] Sweden's press-freedom regime has unique constitutional features:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><em>Tryckfrihetsförordningen</em> (TF) 1766/1949 — world's oldest</li>
@@ -2732,11 +2732,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-constitutional-law-dimension">Constitutional-Law Dimension<a class=""
 <li><strong>Censurförbud</strong> (no pre-publication review) — near-absolute</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Any proposition touching these protections faces constitutional-review scrutiny (Lagrådet). SD's invocation of this heritage positions them rhetorically with a coalition that includes historic press-freedom defenders.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Strömmer, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Strömmer, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-strömmer-april-21"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.55): Strömmer defends prop 2025/26:133 as compatible with TF/YGL. Cites Lagrådet review. Emphasises narrow scope. Deflects broader free-speech concerns to other venues.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): Strömmer acknowledges some SD concerns, commits to refinements in committee-stage (<em>utskottsbehandling</em>), offers language clarifications. This would be a small concession satisfying SD optics.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.15): Strömmer withdraws proposition elements or accepts amendments. Would be a notable defeat but reduces coalition friction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2773,7 +2773,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor">Intelligence Indicators to Monito
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet comments on prop 2025/26:133</td><td>Before committee stage</td><td>Constitutional signal</td></tr><tr><td>Journalist-union (Journalistförbundet) reaction</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Civil-society response</td></tr><tr><td>SD voting alignment in committee</td><td>Committee report</td><td>Coalition-integrity test</td></tr><tr><td>Strömmer's rhetoric ("absolute free speech" vs "balanced")</td><td>April 21 debate</td><td>Framing indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Åkesson public comments</td><td>48 hrs post-debate</td><td>Party-leader signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws">Comparative Framework: Foreign-Influence Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws">Comparative Framework: Foreign-Influence Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2811,29 +2811,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-foreign-influence-laws">Comparative Framework:
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Law</th><th>Speech impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Prop 2025/26:133 (pending)</td><td>Contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>US</strong></td><td>FARA 1938</td><td>Disclosure-based</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Australia</strong></td><td>Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme 2018</td><td>Disclosure; contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>National Security Act 2023</td><td>Broader; contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz 2017</td><td>Platform-focused</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sweden's historical position has been more liberal than most peers — any perceived erosion is politically charged.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟨 MODERATE-LOW — Free-speech is high-salience for elite but medium for general voter
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟢 LOW-MEDIUM — Strömmer can defend proposition on security grounds; SD won't break coalition
 <strong>SD campaign-utility rating</strong>: 6.0/10 — Brand-positioning more than electoral-swing value</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Prop 2025/26:133 (not in this batch; the target document)</li>
 <li>HD10430 — Mosque hate-speech (Jomshof/SD) — companion interpellation showing balanced SD pressure</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10430">HD10430<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10430"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10430-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10430 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:430
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-07 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 5.2/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Richard Jomshof (SD) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Socialminister Jakob Forssmed (KD)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-21</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Richard Jomshof — Chair of the <em>Justitieutskottet</em> (Justice Committee) and a long-standing SD senior MP — interpellates Social Affairs Minister Jakob Forssmed (KD) on mosques that allegedly spread hate and threats. The interpellation references an <em>Expressen</em> exposé on a Sunni mosque in Kristianstad (Skåne) where an imam reportedly preached hate-incitement content. The interpellation presses the minister on government measures to prevent such institutions from operating.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-1"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vilka åtgärder avser ministern och regeringen att vidta för att säkerställa att moskéer och andra trossamfund som sprider hat och hot inte får fortsätta bedriva sin verksamhet?"
 (<em>"What measures do the minister and the government intend to take to ensure that mosques and other religious communities spreading hate and threats are not allowed to continue their operations?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is an <strong>intra-coalition pressure interpellation</strong>. SD and KD agree broadly on religious-extremism concerns, but diverge on the legal instrument and scope. Jomshof's interpellation is not designed to flip government policy — it is designed to <strong>keep religious-extremism visible</strong> in the run-up to Election 2026 and to signal SD's leadership on the issue to its voter base.</p>
 <p><strong>Actor profile: Richard Jomshof</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-1">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <li>By interpellating a KD minister (coalition partner), SD signals it is <strong>pressing government from the right</strong></li>
 <li>Creates headline opportunities for SD's campaign ("SD demands action against extremist mosques")</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk">Counter-Narrative and Civil-Society Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk">Counter-Narrative and Civil-Society Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk"></a></h3>
 <p>[MEDIUM confidence 🟧] The interpellation carries non-trivial risks:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Muslim community organisations may perceive collective stigmatisation</li>
@@ -2874,11 +2874,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-narrative-and-civil-society-risk">Counter-Narrative and Civil
 <li>Precedent risk for non-Muslim religious communities</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Expected progressive response</strong>: C, V, MP will likely file opposing motions or interpellations emphasising due process and discrimination concerns.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Forssmed, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21">Response-Strategy Forecast (Forssmed, April 21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-forssmed-april-21"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.60): Forssmed cites existing legal instruments, ongoing <em>SST</em> reforms, and police-led prosecutions. Emphasises rule-of-law procedures. Avoids new commitments.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): Forssmed signals willingness to review specific SST funding criteria or announces study of best practices from European peers (France, Denmark).</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.10): Forssmed announces a new legal-framework review or a specific targeted mosque-oversight instrument — would require broader coalition sign-off.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2915,7 +2915,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-1">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SST communications post-debate</td><td>New guidelines announced</td><td>Government taking SD line</td></tr><tr><td>Prosecution of the specific Kristianstad imam</td><td>Actionable outcome</td><td>Substantive accountability check</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition counter-motions (V, C)</td><td>Within 14 days</td><td>Political polarisation signal</td></tr><tr><td>Muslim Council of Sweden statement</td><td>Any public reaction</td><td>Community response</td></tr><tr><td>Headline coverage in DN/SvD/Aftonbladet</td><td>Week of April 21</td><td>Media framing indicator</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches">Comparative Framework: European Approaches<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches">Comparative Framework: European Approaches<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2952,29 +2952,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-european-approaches">Comparative Framework: Eur
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Approach</th><th>Outcomes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td><em>Loi Séparatisme</em> 2021 — mosque associations under oversight</td><td>50+ closures; legal challenges</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>2016 imam-preaching ban</td><td>Legally effective; limited scope</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Austria</strong></td><td>2015 Islam law</td><td>Comprehensive; contested</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Case-by-case Verfassungsschutz</td><td>Varies by Land</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>SST funding + hate-speech prosecution</td><td>Narrow instrument</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-1">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-1">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — High for SD base; low for swing voters
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟢 LOW — Within SD-KD policy comfort zone
 <strong>SD campaign-utility rating</strong>: 6.5/10 — Amplifies SD brand without requiring government concession</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents-1">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-1">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10429 — Freedom of expression (SD's Farivar) — thematic pair</li>
 <li>SST annual report 2024 (contextual reference)</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10431">HD10431<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10431"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10431-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10431 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:431
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-14 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 6.0/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Anna Lasses (C) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Bistånds- och utrikeshandelsminister Benjamin Dousa (M)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-28</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Anna Lasses (C) presses Development Aid and Foreign Trade Minister Benjamin Dousa (M) on Sweden's international work for the human rights of LGBTQI+ people. The interpellation cites mounting global pressure on LGBTQI+ rights defenders and the tightening operating environment for HR organisations in authoritarian contexts. This is the <strong>only Centerpartiet (C) interpellation of the batch</strong> — and it is deliberately positioned to signal C's differentiation from government partners on human-rights doctrine.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-2"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Hur avser ministern att säkerställa att Sveriges internationella arbete för hbtqi-personers mänskliga rättigheter upprätthålls och fördjupas?"
 (<em>"How does the minister intend to ensure that Sweden's international work for the human rights of LGBTQI+ people is maintained and deepened?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This interpellation is <strong>strategic positioning rather than pure accountability</strong>. C is one of the Tidö-agreement's external supply partners (not a formal coalition member), and Lasses is using the interpellation instrument to:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Signal to progressive centrist voters that C retains a distinct liberal human-rights profile</li>
@@ -3005,14 +3005,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-2">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <li>Older socially-conservative voters (target: SD/KD pool)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>C's interpellation positions them for the first segment, tactically abandoning the second.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-accountability-dimension">Accountability Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-accountability-dimension">Accountability Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-dimension"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Will Dousa satisfy the interpellation?</strong> [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: Dousa is likely to reaffirm Sweden's historical commitment to LGBTQI+ rights in international aid. However, <em>how</em> he phrases this matters:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Strong answer → Dousa signals M's liberal values; strains SD relations</li>
 <li>Hedged answer → Gives C more attack material; may appear weak to progressives</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Expected framing</strong>: Dousa likely emphasises Sweden's overall human-rights framework (not LGBTQI+ specifically), cites ongoing Sida programmes, and avoids new commitments. This is the lowest-political-cost response.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers">Comparative Framework: Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers">Comparative Framework: Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3050,11 +3050,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-framework-nordic-peers">Comparative Framework: Nordic Pee
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>LGBTQI+ aid doctrine 2025</th><th>Shift vs 2022</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Strong rhetorical; budget constrained</td><td>Narrowing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Strong rhetorical + budget</td><td>Stable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Moderate</td><td>Slight narrowing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Moderate; less explicit</td><td>Stable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Iceland</strong></td><td>Strong</td><td>Stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sweden's previous position as Nordic LGBTQI+-aid leader is slipping — the interpellation implicitly signals this.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28">Response-Strategy Forecast (Dousa, April 28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28">Response-Strategy Forecast (Dousa, April 28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-dousa-april-28"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.65): Affirmative answer citing Sweden's historical role, ongoing Sida funding, and human-rights framework. No new commitments. Limited specifics.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.25): Expanded answer referencing specific programmes (e.g. UN Equal Rights Coalition), with a tacit recognition that funding has been constrained. This would partially satisfy Lasses.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.10): Announcement of a new LGBTQI+-specific Sida funding initiative — would be a political win for C but creates SD tension.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3091,30 +3091,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-2">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Dousa speech framing</td><td>"LGBTQI+" explicit vs generic HR</td><td>C success metric</td></tr><tr><td>SD reaction (Åkesson, Jomshof)</td><td>Public comments post-debate</td><td>Coalition strain indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Sida 2026 budget allocations</td><td>Autumn 2026</td><td>Resource-level confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>C polling in urban areas</td><td>30–60 days</td><td>Campaign traction check</td></tr><tr><td>MP/V amplification</td><td>Next 14 days</td><td>Left-flank positioning</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-2">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-2">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟨 MODERATE — Low-20s voter priority; high symbolic weight
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟡 ELEVATED — Interpellation designed to stress coalition
 <strong>C campaign-utility rating</strong>: 7.0/10 for <em>identity positioning</em> (higher than raw electoral salience because it distinguishes C brand)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents-2">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-2">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10426 — Israel death penalty (Muranovic/S) — related HR pressure vector</li>
 <li>HD10435 — Bernadotte/Israel accountability (El-Haj) — thematic overlap</li>
 <li>Prior Sida annual reports (context references)</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10432">HD10432<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10432"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10432-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10432 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:432
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-15 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 6.5/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Robert Olesen (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Sjukvårdsminister Elisabet Lann (KD)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-05-05 (NEAR)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Robert Olesen (S) interpellates Health Minister Elisabet Lann (KD) on state guarantees for hospital-building investments. Sweden's healthcare infrastructure backbone is ageing rapidly: a substantial share of hospital buildings date from the 1960s–1970s and require either reconstruction, extension, or full replacement. The 21 <em>regioner</em> (regional authorities) carry primary financing responsibility, but rising construction costs and capital-market conditions have narrowed their borrowing capacity.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-3"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vilka åtgärder avser ministern att vidta för att staten ska kunna säkerställa nödvändiga investeringar i vårdbyggnader?"
 (<em>"What measures does the minister intend to take to ensure the state can secure necessary investments in healthcare buildings?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The interpellation operates at the <strong>fiscal-federalism</strong> pressure point in the Swedish welfare model — regions are constitutionally responsible for healthcare but fiscally constrained. By asking what the <strong>state</strong> will do, Olesen forces Lann into the politically charged territory of proposing either (a) direct state financing (expansion of central government responsibility, ideologically difficult for KD), or (b) explicit refusal (politically costly given hospital-closure fears).</p>
 <p><strong>Structural context</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3126,7 +3126,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-3">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Pattern analysis</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is Olesen's <strong>second healthcare-infrastructure interpellation</strong> targeting Lann, following HD10415 (<em>Statligt säkerställande av bra vård</em>). S is building a coordinated "state responsibility for healthcare" narrative across multiple questions, creating incremental pressure rather than one-off confrontation.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition tension vector</strong> [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: KD's traditional position favours expanded state role in healthcare delivery (Christian Democratic "care state" tradition), but the Tidö agreement has pushed the coalition toward <em>regionernas självstyre</em> (regional self-government) framing. Lann is caught between her party's historical instincts and the coalition's operational doctrine.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-quantitative-context">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quantitative-context">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-quantitative-context">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Hospital buildings built 1960–1980</td><td>~60% of stock</td><td>SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)</td></tr><tr><td>Regional investment gap (10-year)</td><td>SEK 60–100 bn</td><td>SKR 2024 estimates</td></tr><tr><td>Average region debt-to-revenue</td><td>~45%</td><td>Statskontoret 2024</td></tr><tr><td>Construction-cost inflation 2021–2025</td><td>+30%</td><td>SCB PPI</td></tr><tr><td>Annual new-hospital starts (Sweden)</td><td>~4–6 major projects</td><td>Regioner aggregated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-dimension">Comparative Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-dimension">Comparative Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-dimension"></a></h3>
 <p>Other Nordic peers structure hospital financing differently:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Norway</strong>: Central government owns hospital trusts (foretak) — direct state investment</li>
@@ -3172,11 +3172,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-dimension">Comparative Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Sweden</strong>: Pure regional financing; state grants ad-hoc</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The interpellation implicitly references that Sweden is <strong>out of step</strong> with the Nordic norm.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5">Response-Strategy Forecast (Lann, May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5">Response-Strategy Forecast (Lann, May 5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-lann-may-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.55): Lann acknowledges the investment gap, cites ongoing state-investment grants for specific projects, and emphasises <em>"sound regional financial management"</em> as the primary lever. Avoids committing to systemic state guarantees.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): Lann signals a planning commission or review to examine capital-funding models. This would be a tactical concession aligning with KD's ideological comfort zone.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.15): Announcement of a specific state-guarantee instrument (like <em>Riksgälden</em>-backed regional bonds). This would be a significant fiscal-policy shift — would require Svantesson's endorsement.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3213,30 +3213,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-3">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lann response framing</td><td>"State guarantee" vs "regional responsibility"</td><td>Ideological positioning</td></tr><tr><td>SKR press reaction</td><td>Strong or muted</td><td>Sector coordination</td></tr><tr><td>V/MP follow-up motions</td><td>Next 14 days</td><td>Left-wing amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson statement on regional finances</td><td>Next 30 days</td><td>Cross-portfolio signal</td></tr><tr><td>2026 budget healthcare line</td><td>Autumn 2026</td><td>Budget-cycle test</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-3">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-3">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM-HIGH — Healthcare ranks top-3 voter concern consistently; specific hospital case studies mobilise regional voters
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — Structural issue predates Tidö; can be deflected to long-term planning
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 6.5/10 — Substantial issue, harder to operationalise into single headline; risk of "abstract policy debate"</p>
-<h2 id="rm-related-documents-3">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-3">Related Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10415 — <em>Statligt säkerställande av bra vård</em> (prior Olesen interpellation to Lann)</li>
 <li>frs 2024/25 healthcare-budget lines (prior motions)</li>
 <li>SKR "Ekonomirapporten" 2024 (context reference)</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10433">HD10433<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10433"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10433-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10433 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:433
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-15 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 7.8/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-29 (9 days remaining)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S) — a tax-committee specialist — presses Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) on the "legitimacy, efficiency and distributional profile" (<em>legitimitet, effektivitet och fördelningsprofil</em>) of the Swedish tax system. The interpellation frames a systemic paradox: Sweden taxes labour income at one of Europe's highest effective marginal rates while hosting <strong>one of the world's highest per-capita densities of billionaires</strong> (Credit Suisse/Forbes estimates place Sweden in the global top-3 per-capita, behind only Monaco and Switzerland).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-4"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Avser ministern att verka för en bred översyn av det svenska skattesystemet i syfte att öka dess legitimitet och effektivitet?"
 (<em>"Does the minister intend to work for a broad review of the Swedish tax system with the aim of increasing its legitimacy and efficiency?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The interpellation is an <strong>ideological accountability ambush</strong> rather than a narrow policy question. By asking Svantesson to endorse a "broad tax review," Ekeroth Clausson forces the minister into a binary choice:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Accept → signals that current tax doctrine is failing (politically damaging for M)</li>
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-4">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Option</th><th>Feasibility</th><th>Political cost</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Announce a commission/review</td><td>Possible</td><td>Low — standard government deflection</td></tr><tr><td>Defend 3:12 explicitly</td><td>Difficult</td><td>High — exposes structural inequality</td></tr><tr><td>Cite international tax competitiveness</td><td>Possible</td><td>Medium — S can cite IMF/OECD fairness research</td></tr><tr><td>Deflect to EU-level action</td><td>Possible</td><td>Medium — neutralizes but does not resolve</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Accountability dimension</strong>: Whatever Svantesson says, S will have a sound-bite. If she promises a review → S claims victory; if she rejects → S has campaign material.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy">Structural Data: Sweden Tax Legitimacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy">Structural Data: Sweden Tax Legitimacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3342,7 +3342,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-structural-data-sweden-tax-legitimacy">Structural Data: Sweden Tax Le
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th><th>Source</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Labour-income top marginal rate (incl. municipal)</td><td>~52–57%</td><td>Skatteverket</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Capital-gains rate on listed shares</td><td>30%</td><td>Skatteverket</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Effective 3:12 rate (realistic)</td><td>~20–25%</td><td>Riksrevisionen 2024</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Billionaires per million inhabitants</td><td>~52–55</td><td>Forbes 2024</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td></tr><tr><td>Gini coefficient (disposable income)</td><td>0.303</td><td>SCB 2023</td><td>[HIGH] 🟩</td></tr><tr><td>Wealth Gini</td><td>0.80+ (EU: 0.73 avg)</td><td>ECB HFCS</td><td>[MEDIUM] 🟧</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Interpretation</strong>: Disposable-income Gini is moderate (EU average); wealth Gini is among the highest in Europe. The interpellation implicitly targets the wealth dimension, where S's argument is strongest.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension">Analytic Framework: Social-Contract Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension">Analytic Framework: Social-Contract Tension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[Labour Income High Tax] -->|Funds| B[Welfare State]
     C[Capital Income Lower Effective Tax] -->|Concentrates| D[Wealth Elite]
@@ -3355,7 +3355,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analytic-framework-social-contract-tension">Analytic Framework: Socia
     style H fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style D fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style E fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3392,28 +3392,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-4">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Watch window</th><th>Analytical significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson response tone on "review" word</td><td>April 29 debate</td><td>Will she concede rhetorical ground?</td></tr><tr><td>LO (trade union confederation) reaction</td><td>April 29–May 3</td><td>Coordinated campaign signal</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet) motion filings</td><td>Next 14 days</td><td>Left-flank amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Finansdepartementet budget preview</td><td>May 2026</td><td>Tactical tax-policy announcement</td></tr><tr><td>Skatteverket analytical publications</td><td>Rolling</td><td>Structural-data releases</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29">Response-Strategy Forecast (Svantesson, April 29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29">Response-Strategy Forecast (Svantesson, April 29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-strategy-forecast-svantesson-april-29"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most likely</strong> (P=0.60): Svantesson announces willingness to "look at targeted elements" without committing to a systemic review. Defends the 2025 budget as "broad-based relief" for ordinary workers. Cites 2026 budget preparation as forum for continued dialogue.</p>
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.25): Svantesson defends 3:12 as "entrepreneurship incentive" and pivots to reducing labour taxes further — tactically appealing to swing voters but cements S's structural critique.</p>
 <p><strong>Lower probability</strong> (P=0.15): Announcement of a formal <em>utredning</em> (government inquiry) into tax-system legitimacy — this would be a strategic concession but gives S a year of narrative control.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-4">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-4">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Fairness framing, top-10 voter issue, sharp ideological contrast
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — Svantesson is skilled; 3:12 is defensible; timeline favours government (budget in autumn)
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 7.8/10 — Strong systemic argument, harder to "quick-win" in single debate</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10434">HD10434<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10434"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10434-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10434 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:434
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-15 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 7.2/10
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Leif Nysmed (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Infrastruktur- och bostadsminister Andreas Carlson (KD)
 <strong>SISVA (response deadline)</strong>: 2026-04-29 (9 days remaining as of analysis date)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Leif Nysmed (S), a Stockholm-county S MP with a track record of housing-policy interpellations, targets Infrastructure/Housing Minister Andreas Carlson (KD) on the 900-unit year-on-year decline in Stockholm-region housing starts. The interpellation relies on Länsstyrelsen Stockholm's municipality-aggregated forecast: 11,091 starts in 2026 vs ~12,000 in 2025. This is Carlson's 6th+ interpellation of the session and the first quantitatively grounded housing-specific one.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-5"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Vilka åtgärder avser ministern och regeringen att vidta för att öka bostadsbyggandet i Stockholmsregionen?"
 (<em>"What measures do the minister and the government intend to take to increase housing construction in the Stockholm region?"</em>)</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: The 900-unit decline is a <strong>government-source-confirmed metric</strong> (Länsstyrelsen Stockholm is a state authority under the Ministry of Finance), which removes the government's standard rhetorical defence that opposition housing statistics are contested. Carlson cannot dispute the baseline. This transforms the interpellation from a policy debate into an accountability test: either Carlson announces concrete counter-measures by April 29, or the decline becomes the headline.</p>
 <p><strong>Why it matters for Election 2026</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Housing affordability consistently ranks among the top-5 voter concerns in Stockholm-county polling (SCB/SVT Väljarbarometern). Stockholm county has 29 of 349 Riksdag seats (8.3%) — any swing here materially affects coalition arithmetic. S has held ~28–31% in Stockholm polls; a concrete Carlson failure narrative could lift S to 33–35% in the seat-rich region.</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern analysis</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is the <strong>6th+ interpellation targeting Carlson</strong> in the 2025/26 session:</p>
@@ -3439,7 +3439,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-5">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <li>(P=0.40) Pivot to national aggregates where 2026 shows marginal increase in other regions</li>
 <li>(P=0.20) Concede the decline and announce an emergency package (politically costly for KD)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-quantitative-context-1">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quantitative-context-1">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quantitative-context-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3475,7 +3475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-quantitative-context-1">Quantitative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th>2024</th><th>2025 (est.)</th><th>2026 (forecast)</th><th>YoY % change 25→26</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Stockholm-region housing starts</td><td>~13,800</td><td>~11,991</td><td>11,091</td><td><strong>−7.5%</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm demand gap (vs Boverket target)</td><td>−4,200</td><td>−5,800</td><td><strong>−6,700</strong></td><td>Widening</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden national housing starts</td><td>~23,500</td><td>~22,000</td><td>~23,000</td><td>+4.5%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Derived indicator</strong>: Stockholm is <strong>underperforming the national trend</strong>, which weakens the government's "national cycle" defence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-interpellation-linkage">Cross-Interpellation Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-interpellation-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-interpellation-linkage">Cross-Interpellation Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-interpellation-linkage"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     HD10434[HD10434 Stockholm housing] --> AC[Andreas Carlson KD]
     HD10417[HD10417 Södra stambanan rail] --> AC
@@ -3488,7 +3488,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-interpellation-linkage">Cross-Interpellation Linkage<a class=""
 
     style AC fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style NARRATIVE fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3525,42 +3525,42 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-5">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Carlson response tone (April 29)</td><td>Defensive vs proactive</td><td>Signals coalition confidence</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen announcement of PBL revision</td><td>Pre-May 5</td><td>Tactical concession indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Boverket 2-month forecast update (expected May)</td><td>Further downward revision</td><td>Accelerates narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Länsstyrelsen press releases</td><td>New municipality warnings</td><td>Ground-truth confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>LO/Byggnads union statements</td><td>Coordinated attack</td><td>S-union alignment signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-5">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-5">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Top-5 Stockholm-voter issue; 29-seat swing region
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🔴 HIGH — State-source data; narrow rhetorical options
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 8.5/10 — Concrete, local, quantified, accountable to a named minister</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10435">HD10435<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10435"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10435-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10435 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:435<br>
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-16 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 9.0/10<br>
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Jamal El-Haj (-) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Utrikesminister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>The most substantive and historically ambitious interpellation of the batch. Independent MP El-Haj (former S member) demands that Sweden's government require Israel to: (1) accept accountability for the 1948 Bernadotte assassination, (2) issue public apology, and (3) pay financial compensation to the Bernadotte family.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text">Three Explicit Demands (from full text)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text">Three Explicit Demands (from full text)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-explicit-demands-from-full-text"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><em>"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att staten Israel tar ansvar för mordet på Folke Bernadotte?"</em></li>
 <li><em>"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att Israel framför en offentlig ursäkt till familjen Bernadotte och till Sverige?"</em></li>
 <li><em>"Avser ministern och regeringen att kräva att Israel utger ekonomisk kompensation till Bernadottes familj?"</em></li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical background</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Count Folke Bernadotte, Swedish diplomat and UN mediator, was assassinated by the Lehi (Stern Gang) paramilitary group on September 17, 1948 in Jerusalem. The murderers were never prosecuted — one (Yitzhak Shamir) later became Israeli Prime Minister. The interpellation cites that perpetrators were decorated with a "tapperhetsmedalj" (valor medal) for their role in "contributing to Israel's founding."</p>
 <p><strong>Contemporary link</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: El-Haj explicitly connects the historical assassination to the 2025/26 Israeli Knesset legislation enabling death penalty. He argues both reflect a pattern of state-sanctioned political violence against perceived opponents.</p>
 <p><strong>Diplomatic context</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Malmer Stenergard has already publicly criticized Israeli death penalty legislation (noted in the interpellation text). However, calling for Israeli accountability, apology, and compensation goes far beyond the government's current position. Response is due April 30 — in 10 days.</p>
 <p><strong>Identity of filer</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Jamal El-Haj is listed as independent (-). He was previously associated with S before breaking over Israel-Palestine policy. His willingness to file this interpellation without S party endorsement indicates that S party leadership calculated the demands are too diplomatically extreme for official opposition policy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-accountability-assessment">Accountability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-accountability-assessment">Accountability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-accountability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Will government comply with demands?</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Almost certainly not. Sweden will acknowledge the historical events and maintain its criticism of current Israeli policies, but demanding formal apology and compensation is a diplomatic step not supported by current Swedish foreign policy doctrine.</p>
 <p><strong>Will this embarrass Malmer Stenergard?</strong> [MEDIUM confidence 🟧]: The response window (April 30) creates media attention. If the minister gives a weak or evasive answer to three explicit numbered demands, opposition MPs can point to the specific unanswered questions.</p>
 <p><strong>Response deadline</strong>: April 30, 2026 (SISVA) — URGENT<br>
 <strong>ANM</strong>: April 21, 2026</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10436">HD10436<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10436"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10436-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10436 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:436
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-16 | <strong>Status</strong>: <strong>ÅTERTAGEN (WITHDRAWN)</strong> | <strong>Significance</strong>: 4.0/10 (significance derives from withdrawal pattern, not content)
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Mats Wiking (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Gymnasie-, högskole- och forskningsminister Lotta Edholm (L)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Mats Wiking (S) filed this interpellation on measures to strengthen Sweden's space industry, then <strong>withdrew</strong> it before chamber announcement. The original text emphasised the growing societal importance of space (satellite data, defence-linked infrastructure) and the strategic significance of the Kiruna/Esrange complex as NATO's only operational European satellite-launch site for small launchers.</p>
 <p>Because the interpellation was withdrawn, its <strong>political signal</strong> — rather than its policy substance — becomes the analytic focus.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-why-withdrawals-matter">Why Withdrawals Matter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-withdrawals-matter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-withdrawals-matter">Why Withdrawals Matter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-withdrawals-matter"></a></h3>
 <p>In Swedish parliamentary practice, interpellations are rarely withdrawn. Withdrawal patterns (<em>återtagen</em>) typically signal one of four conditions:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Negotiated resolution</strong>: The minister or ministry provided informal assurances or concessions that satisfied the interpellator</li>
@@ -3573,7 +3573,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-why-withdrawals-matter">Why Withdrawals Matter<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Moderately likely</strong> (P=0.30): <strong>Tactical consolidation</strong>. With S filing 7 interpellations in 6 days (April 14–17), withdrawing one signals deliberate prioritisation. S's top-tier attacks (HD10437 EU directive, HD10438 shelters, HD10434 housing, HD10433 tax) are clearly prioritised for campaign messaging. Space industry, while strategically important, does not fit S's preferred pre-election frame of <strong>domestic welfare and accountability</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>Less likely</strong> (P=0.15): <strong>Information update</strong>. The government may have made a public announcement (budget item, commission report) between April 16 filing and the withdrawal decision that rendered the interpellation unnecessary.</p>
 <p><strong>Low probability</strong> (P=0.05): <strong>Internal party coordination</strong>. S leadership may have reviewed the strategic fit and decided this interpellation was off-message.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry">Strategic Context: Sweden's Space Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry">Strategic Context: Sweden's Space Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Esrange (Kiruna) — Europe's only mainland-based operational sounding-rocket site; rapidly developing small-satellite launch capability</li>
@@ -3591,7 +3591,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strategic-context-swedens-space-industry">Strategic Context: Sweden's
 <li>Industrial policy (export-oriented tech sector)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>A lone backbench interpellation cannot do justice to this complexity — which partially explains why it may have been withdrawn in favour of more focused attacks.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking">Actor Profile: Mats Wiking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking">Actor Profile: Mats Wiking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</p>
 <ul>
 <li>S MP from Västra Götalands län norra</li>
@@ -3600,7 +3600,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-actor-profile-mats-wiking">Actor Profile: Mats Wiking<a class="" aria
 <li>Possible professional interest in space/industrial policy</li>
 <li>Withdrawal behaviour consistent with collaborative rather than antagonistic positioning</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm">Target Profile: Lotta Edholm<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm">Target Profile: Lotta Edholm<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm"></a></h3>
 <p>[HIGH confidence 🟩]</p>
 <ul>
 <li>L Minister for Higher Education and Research</li>
@@ -3609,7 +3609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-target-profile-lotta-edholm">Target Profile: Lotta Edholm<a class=""
 <li>Relatively non-confrontational ministerial style</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The combination (non-confrontational S MP + collaborative L minister + strategically important sector) favours the "negotiated resolution" hypothesis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal">Intelligence Value of the Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal">Intelligence Value of the Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Counter-intelligence reading</strong>: The withdrawal itself is a <strong>positive signal</strong> for the government's space-industry policy trajectory. It suggests:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Informal cross-party consensus is functional on strategic industrial policy</li>
@@ -3618,7 +3618,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-value-of-the-withdrawal">Intelligence Value of the Withd
 <li>There is no exploitable political failure in the Swedish space sector as of April 2026</li>
 </ol>
 <p>For the S campaign narrative, this is a notable <em>absence</em>: S has no concrete accountability material on space industry to deploy in Election 2026 messaging.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers">Comparative Context: Space-Industry Politics in Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers">Comparative Context: Space-Industry Politics in Nordic Peers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3651,7 +3651,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-context-space-industry-politics-in-nordic-peers">Comparat
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Space policy profile</th><th>Political salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Launch site, commercial launches, NATO-aligned</td><td>Rising</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Andøya launch site; strong defence linkage</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Smaller ecosystem; ICEYE commercial leader</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>No launch site; strong CubeSat university sector</td><td>Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sweden's position as a launch-host nation is unique in the Nordic peer group and creates strategic leverage within EU and NATO space cooperation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6">Intelligence Indicators to Monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3688,30 +3688,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-indicators-to-monitor-6">Intelligence Indicators to Moni
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Edholm policy announcement within 30 days</td><td>Esrange investment/NATO alignment</td><td>Confirms "negotiated resolution" hypothesis</td></tr><tr><td>Follow-up S interpellation on space (next 60 days)</td><td>Different filer, same topic</td><td>Would invalidate hypothesis</td></tr><tr><td>Rymdstyrelsen budget preview for 2026</td><td>Autumn 2026</td><td>Resource confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>GKN Aerospace announcements</td><td>Rolling</td><td>Industry-trajectory signal</td></tr><tr><td>NATO Space Centre updates</td><td>Rolling</td><td>Alliance-level indicator</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-6">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-6">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟢 LOW (direct) / 🟧 MEDIUM (via defence/industry framing)
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: 🟢 LOW — Withdrawal signals no current exploitable failure
 <strong>S campaign-utility rating</strong>: 3.0/10 — Not deployable in current form</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodological-note">Methodological Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodological-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodological-note">Methodological Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodological-note"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis treats the <strong>withdrawal itself</strong> as the primary analytical object. In political-intelligence practice, non-events and withdrawals often carry higher signal-to-noise ratios than routine filings because they reveal behind-the-scenes coordination. Monitoring <em>pattern</em> deviations (e.g., the ratio of filed vs withdrawn interpellations per party per session) can surface strategic inflection points that raw filing counts miss.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10437">HD10437<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10437"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10437-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10437 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:437<br>
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-17 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 9.2/10</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-8">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-8">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L) on Sweden's failure to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive. The government withdrew its own implementation proposal, and Sweden will not meet the EU deadline.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-6"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Varför väljer ministern och regeringen att inte implementera direktivet?"<br>
 ("Why does the minister and the government choose not to implement the directive?")</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is the most legally and politically consequential interpellation of the batch. The EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive 2023/970/EU) entered into force in June 2023 with a transposition deadline of June 7, 2026. Sweden's government WITHDREW its implementation proposal, meaning the directive will NOT be implemented on time. This creates: (1) EU infringement risk, (2) electoral vulnerability for coalition on gender equality, and (3) a documented policy failure that S can use in campaign materials.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this matters for Election 2026</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Sweden's gender pay gap is "bestående och har till och med ökat de senaste åren" (persistent and has even increased in recent years) — the interpellation's own words. L, as a liberal party claiming commitment to gender equality, cannot reconcile its values with its minister presiding over this compliance failure. S has a ready-made campaign message.</p>
 <p><strong>Accountability dimension</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is not a nuanced policy disagreement — the government withdrew its own proposal. The factual record is established. Larsson must explain why Sweden chose to miss an EU deadline on equal pay.</p>
 <p><strong>Response deadline</strong>: May 5, 2026 (SISVA)<br>
 <strong>ANM (announced to chamber)</strong>: April 21, 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline">Mermaid Diagram: EU Directive Compliance Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline">Mermaid Diagram: EU Directive Compliance Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title EU Pay Transparency Directive: Sweden's Compliance Crisis
     dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
@@ -3724,22 +3724,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-diagram-eu-directive-compliance-timeline">Mermaid Diagram: EU
     Interpellation filed (Amloh/S)    :2026-04-17, 1d
     Chamber announcement (ANM)        :2026-04-21, 1d
     Minister response deadline        :crit, 2026-05-05, 1d</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implication-7">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implication-7">Election 2026 Implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implication-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong>: 🟦 VERY HIGH — Pay equity is top-5 women voters issue<br>
 <strong>Government vulnerability</strong>: The withdrawal of the proposal is irrevocable — no spin possible</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10438">HD10438<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10438"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10438-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10438 | <strong>frs</strong>: 2025/26:438<br>
 <strong>Datum</strong>: 2026-04-17 | <strong>Status</strong>: Skickad | <strong>Significance</strong>: 8.5/10<br>
 <strong>Inlämnare</strong>: Sofia Amloh (S) | <strong>Mottagare</strong>: Jämställdhetsminister Nina Larsson (L)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-9">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-9">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>Sofia Amloh (S) interpellates Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson (L) on the nationwide closure of women's shelters (kvinnojourer). Civil society organizations critical to gender-based violence prevention are shutting down due to funding gaps.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7">Key Question (direct from document)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-question-direct-from-document-7"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Hur tänker ministern agera för att kvinnojourer inte ska behöva lägga ned sin viktiga verksamhet?"<br>
 ("How does the minister intend to act so that women's shelters do not have to close their important operations?")</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Core finding</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Women's shelters in Sweden are operated by "idéburna organisationer" (civil society/non-profit organizations). Many are closing due to inadequate state funding. The interpellation frames this as a direct failure of the government's anti-violence against women strategy. The consequence cited: "stora konsekvenser för möjligheten att lämna en våldsam relation" (major consequences for the ability to leave a violent relationship).</p>
 <p><strong>Coordination significance</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: This is filed the SAME DAY as frs 2025/26:437 (EU Pay Transparency Directive). Both target the same minister on related gender equality themes. Amloh is clearly executing a coordinated parliamentary assault on Larsson's portfolio from multiple angles simultaneously.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy context</strong> [HIGH confidence 🟩]: Sweden's government has, over recent years, shifted funding away from civil society anti-violence organizations toward municipal and regional delivery. The interpellation implies this shift has left funding gaps that women's shelters cannot fill.</p>
@@ -3747,11 +3747,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment-8">Political Intelligence Assessmen
 <p><strong>Response deadline</strong>: May 5, 2026 (SISVA)<br>
 <strong>ANM</strong>: April 21, 2026 (same as HD10437 — simultaneous chamber announcement)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Focus</strong>: HD10437 (frs 2025/26:437) in EU comparative context
 <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2</p>
 <p>This document places Sweden's apparent Pay Transparency Directive transposition failure in comparative EU context, which materially strengthens (or weakens) the political-accountability narrative. Directive 2023/970/EU — the "Pay Transparency Directive" — was adopted on 10 May 2023 with a <strong>transposition deadline of 7 June 2026</strong> (Art. 34).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-directive-summary-2023970eu">Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-directive-summary-2023970eu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-directive-summary-2023970eu">Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-directive-summary-2023970eu"></a></h3>
 <p>Core obligations on Member States:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Mandatory gender pay-gap reporting for employers ≥100 workers (phased by size)</li>
@@ -3762,7 +3762,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-directive-summary-2023970eu">Directive Summary (2023/970/EU)<a class=
 <li>Compensation for workers for proven discrimination (no ceiling)</li>
 <li>Member-state designation of enforcement bodies</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states">Transposition Status Across Selected Member States<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states">Transposition Status Across Selected Member States<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Based on public legislative tracking as of April 2026 — [MEDIUM confidence 🟧] due to the rapidly-shifting transposition landscape. Sources: Member State government websites, European Commission DG EMPL communications, national union reports.</em></p>
 
 
@@ -3849,14 +3849,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-transposition-status-across-selected-member-states">Transposition Sta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Status (April 2026)</th><th>Legislative vehicle</th><th align="center">Expected on-time?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ireland</strong></td><td>✅ Transposed (2024)</td><td>Gender Pay Gap Information Act 2021 + Amendments 2024</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Spain</strong></td><td>✅ Transposed (2024)</td><td>Real Decreto extensions</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>🟡 In advanced parliamentary debate</td><td>Loi Egalité professionnelle reform</td><td align="center">✅ Likely by June</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>🟡 Draft legislation (<em>Entgelttransparenzgesetz</em> reform) in Bundestag</td><td>Federal law amendment</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>🟡 Draft legislation in Tweede Kamer</td><td>Wet gelijke beloning</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>🟡 Tripartite negotiations concluding</td><td>Ligelønsloven amendment</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>🟢 Government bill introduced</td><td>Tasa-arvolaki amendment</td><td align="center">✅ Likely by June</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Belgium</strong></td><td>🟢 Royal Decree transposition</td><td>Loi salaire égal amendment</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Poland</strong></td><td>🔴 Delayed; no active bill</td><td>—</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Hungary</strong></td><td>🔴 No transposition activity</td><td>—</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Italy</strong></td><td>🟡 Draft in Camera dei Deputati</td><td>Legge delega</td><td align="center">⚠️ Tight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>🇸🇪 Sweden</strong></td><td>🔴 <strong>Proposal withdrawn; no active legislation</strong></td><td>—</td><td align="center">❌ <strong>Will miss deadline</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong> [MEDIUM 🟧]: Transposition tracking requires continuous monitoring; some Member States may have made progress not yet publicly reported. The general picture — that Sweden, Poland, and Hungary are the most visibly behind — is robust.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway">Strategic Comparative Takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway">Strategic Comparative Takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-comparative-takeaway"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's transposition failure is <strong>not an isolated underperformance</strong>. Poland and Hungary also appear likely to miss the deadline. However, the political significance is different:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Poland and Hungary</strong> have complicated ideological trajectories on EU social-policy directives — their non-compliance is expected and politically "priced-in" by the Commission.</li>
 <li><strong>Sweden's</strong> non-compliance is politically surprising because Sweden has historically been among the strongest advocates for EU gender-equality law and has one of the most developed national equality-law frameworks.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This means Sweden's failure carries <strong>higher reputational cost per unit of non-compliance</strong> than Poland's or Hungary's. The EU political economy treats a Swedish gender-equality failure as more damaging to the directive's legitimacy than an Eastern European failure.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context">Gender Pay Gap Comparative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context">Gender Pay Gap Comparative Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Eurostat unadjusted gender pay gap data, most recent available (2023):</em></p>
 
 
@@ -3930,7 +3930,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-gender-pay-gap-comparative-context">Gender Pay Gap Comparative Contex
 <li>However, the interpellation's own text (frs 2025/26:437) notes the gap is <em>"bestående och har till och med ökat de senaste åren"</em> (persistent and has even increased in recent years) — a specifically Swedish trend-reversal</li>
 <li>This means: Sweden is comparatively good but <em>getting worse</em>, which amplifies the political cost of failing the directive that is meant to reverse the trend</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison">Legal-Regulatory Environment Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison">Legal-Regulatory Environment Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3986,7 +3986,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legal-regulatory-environment-comparison">Legal-Regulatory Environment
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (current)</th><th>EU Directive (required by 7 Jun 2026)</th><th>Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pay-gap reporting</td><td>Employers ≥10 (annual <em>lönekartläggning</em> since 2017)</td><td>≥100 phased</td><td>Sweden partially ahead</td></tr><tr><td>Pay information on request</td><td>Limited</td><td>Required</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Joint pay assessment threshold</td><td>N/A</td><td>≥5% unexplained gap</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Recruitment pay transparency</td><td>No obligation</td><td>Required (salary range)</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Burden of proof</td><td>Shared</td><td>Shifted to employer</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation</td><td>Capped in practice</td><td>Uncapped</td><td>Gap</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement body</td><td>DO (Diskrimineringsombudsmannen)</td><td>To be designated</td><td>Alignment possible</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden's <em>lönekartläggning</em> obligation under <em>Diskrimineringslagen</em> is an <strong>early-mover strength</strong>, but the directive's broader scope (recruitment, worker-information rights, compensation, burden of proof) is <strong>not currently met</strong>. Transposition is substantive, not merely formal.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response">Trade Union and Civil Society Comparative Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response">Trade Union and Civil Society Comparative Response<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4024,7 +4024,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-trade-union-and-civil-society-comparative-response">Trade Union and C
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Trade union position</th><th>Employer position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>LO and TCO support directive; pressure for timely transposition</td><td>Svenskt Näringsliv: implementation "complex"; supports phasing</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>DGB strongly supports; draft already tabled</td><td>BDA: moderate reservations</td></tr><tr><td>France</td><td>CFDT supports; campaign visible</td><td>Medef: cautious</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>FNV supports</td><td>VNO-NCW: moderate reservations</td></tr><tr><td>Poland</td><td>Solidarity moderate support</td><td>PKPP Lewiatan: cautious</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific observation</strong>: Amloh's interpellation (HD10437) is consistent with LO/TCO positioning. The coordinated S–union alignment is a standard Social Democratic play and is facilitated by the interpellation creating a documented minister-accountability record that unions can cite.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-infringement-risk-assessment">Infringement Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-infringement-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-infringement-risk-assessment">Infringement Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-infringement-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>If Sweden misses the June 7 deadline, the European Commission has standard infringement procedure options:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Letter of Formal Notice</strong> (Month 1–3 after deadline)</li>
@@ -4034,13 +4034,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-infringement-risk-assessment">Infringement Risk Assessment<a class=""
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Historic Commission practice</strong>: The Commission typically allows ~2–4 months grace post-deadline for late transposition before formal action. Sweden would likely receive a letter of formal notice by late 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Political significance for Election 2026</strong>: Any EU Commission communication during the campaign window (summer 2026) becomes domestic-political ammunition. S's interpellation strategy is timed to create a documentary record <em>before</em> this EU process starts, positioning S as the domestic accountability actor and the Commission as the external authority.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns">Lessons from Cross-Country Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns">Lessons from Cross-Country Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-from-cross-country-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Ireland and Spain</strong> demonstrate that early transposition is possible even in countries with complex industrial relations. The Irish approach (employer-driven reporting with statutory framework) is a viable model that Sweden could replicate rapidly.</li>
 <li><strong>France and Germany</strong> show that late-but-active transposition reduces political cost — the problem is <strong>withdrawal of a proposal with no replacement</strong>, which is Sweden's specific situation.</li>
 <li><strong>Denmark and Finland</strong> demonstrate that tripartite-negotiation models (Nordic tradition) can produce on-time transposition — raising the question of why Sweden's tripartite structure has not delivered here.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article">Recommendations for the Published Article<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article">Recommendations for the Published Article<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article"></a></h3>
 <p>The article should explicitly include:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Sweden's transposition failure in EU context (not an isolated issue, but politically more costly per unit)</li>
@@ -4049,7 +4049,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-recommendations-for-the-published-article">Recommendations for the Pu
 <li>The Irish and Spanish early-transposition models as viable alternatives</li>
 <li>The infringement-timeline implications for Election 2026 messaging</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-references">References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-references">References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Directive (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 to strengthen the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms</li>
 <li>Eurostat: Gender pay gap statistics (2023 most recent)</li>
@@ -4059,10 +4059,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-references">References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence grade</strong>: MEDIUM–HIGH 🟧🟩 — Directive and Swedish law facts are HIGH; cross-country transposition status is MEDIUM due to rapidly-shifting legislative landscape across 27 Member States</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Total Interpellations</strong>: 10</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience">🔴 TIER 1 — High Electoral Impact (Pre-Election 2026 Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience">🔴 TIER 1 — High Electoral Impact (Pre-Election 2026 Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4097,7 +4097,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tier-1--high-electoral-impact-pre-election-2026-salience">🔴 TIER
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Electoral Salience</th><th>Key Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD10437</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:437</td><td>Gender Equality / EU Compliance</td><td>🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Sweden to MISS EU Pay Transparency Directive deadline — government implementation proposal withdrawn</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10438</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:438</td><td>Gender Equality / Women's Safety</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td><td>Women's shelters (kvinnojourer) closing nationwide — direct connection to gender-based violence prevention</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10433</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:433</td><td>Fiscal Policy / Tax Fairness</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td><td>Sweden has most billionaires per capita while taxing labor heavily — social contract legitimacy crisis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues">🟡 TIER 2 — Significant Political Accountability Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues">🟡 TIER 2 — Significant Political Accountability Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4139,7 +4139,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tier-2--significant-political-accountability-issues">🟡 TIER 2 —
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Electoral Salience</th><th>Key Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD10434</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:434</td><td>Housing / Regional Development</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Stockholm housing starts down 900 units vs 2025 — Carlson's 6th+ interpellation on infrastructure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10435</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:435</td><td>Foreign Policy / Human Rights / Israel</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historical assassination (1948) linked to current Israeli death penalty law — diplomatic pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10432</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:432</td><td>Healthcare Infrastructure</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Hospital investment crisis — 1960s buildings, no state guarantee mechanism</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10431</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:431</td><td>Foreign Aid / Human Rights</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>LGBTQ+ rights under global pressure — Dousa's (M) foreign aid alignment questioned</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny">🟢 TIER 3 — Government Accountability / Opposition Scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny">🟢 TIER 3 — Government Accountability / Opposition Scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4170,7 +4170,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tier-3--government-accountability--opposition-scrutiny">🟢 TIER 3
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD10430</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:430</td><td>Religious Freedom / Social Policy</td><td>Mosque hate-speech targeting — SD pressure on KD minister</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10429</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:429</td><td>Freedom of Expression / Justice</td><td>SD presses on proposition 2025/26:133 and press freedom tradition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10436</strong></td><td>frs 2025/26:436</td><td>Research Policy / Space Industry</td><td><strong>WITHDRAWN</strong> — Politically significant: S withdrew space industry interpellation suggesting negotiated resolution or internal pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-by-submitting-party">Classification by Submitting Party<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-submitting-party"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-submitting-party">Classification by Submitting Party<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-submitting-party"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4207,7 +4207,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-by-submitting-party">Classification by Submitting Part
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Count</th><th>Strategy</th><th>Ministers Targeted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>7</td><td>Pre-election accountability campaign across gender, housing, healthcare, taxation</td><td>Larsson (L) x2, Carlson (KD), Svantesson (M), Lann (KD) + 1 withdrawn</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>Freedom of expression + religious institution oversight</td><td>Strömmer (M), Forssmed (KD)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>Human rights/development aid</td><td>Dousa (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Independent (-)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>Foreign policy accountability — Bernadotte/Israel</td><td>Malmer Stenergard (M)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-document-confidence-scores">Document Confidence Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-confidence-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-confidence-scores">Document Confidence Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-confidence-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4280,8 +4280,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-confidence-scores">Document Confidence Scores<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Significance</th><th>Evidence Quality</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>9/10</td><td>Full text available — EU directive failure documented</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>8/10</td><td>Full text available — women's shelter crisis with concrete question</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10435</td><td>9/10</td><td>Full text available — detailed historical/legal analysis</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>7/10</td><td>Full text available — systemic tax fairness critique</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>7/10</td><td>Full text available — 11,091 units + Länsstyrelsen quote</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>6/10</td><td>Summary data — 1960s hospital infrastructure crisis</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10431</td><td>6/10</td><td>Summary data — LGBTQ+ rights international</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td>5/10</td><td>Summary data — mosque hate-speech scrutiny</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>5/10</td><td>Summary data — freedom of expression prop 2025/26:133</td><td>[MEDIUM]</td></tr><tr><td>HD10436</td><td>3/10</td><td>WITHDRAWN — politically significant absence</td><td>[HIGH]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-classification-dimensions">Secondary Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-classification-dimensions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-by-accountability-target-type">By Accountability Target Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-accountability-target-type"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-classification-dimensions">Secondary Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-classification-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-accountability-target-type">By Accountability Target Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-accountability-target-type"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4323,7 +4323,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-accountability-target-type">By Accountability Target Type<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Target type</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>dok_ids</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU-compliance failure</strong></td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10437</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Domestic service-delivery failure</strong></td><td align="center">3</td><td>HD10438 (shelters), HD10432 (hospitals), HD10434 (housing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal/Systemic policy</strong></td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10433 (tax)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Foreign-policy / HR</strong></td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10435 (Bernadotte), HD10431 (LGBTQI+)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security / Civil-liberties balance</strong></td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10429 (expression), HD10430 (extremism)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Industrial policy</strong> (withdrawn)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10436</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-by-strategic-function">By Strategic Function<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-strategic-function"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-strategic-function">By Strategic Function<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-strategic-function"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4360,7 +4360,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-strategic-function">By Strategic Function<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Function</th><th>Description</th><th>dok_ids</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document-the-failure</strong></td><td>Creates a paper record for future exploitation</td><td>HD10437, HD10438, HD10434, HD10433</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Force-a-position</strong></td><td>Compels minister to state a policy on sensitive ground</td><td>HD10435, HD10431</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Brand-signalling</strong></td><td>Distinguishes filing party from coalition partners or opposition peers</td><td>HD10429 (SD inverts), HD10431 (C distinguishes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Base-mobilisation</strong></td><td>Speaks to party's voter base</td><td>HD10430 (SD base), HD10438 (S female voters)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saturation-targeting</strong></td><td>Denies minister any safe policy area</td><td>HD10434 (6th+ Carlson interpellation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-by-evidence-density">By Evidence Density<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-evidence-density"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-evidence-density">By Evidence Density<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-evidence-density"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellations with the highest evidence density (verifiable data points referenced in the text) are the hardest to refute and therefore most durable for accountability purposes:</p>
 
 
@@ -4410,7 +4410,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-evidence-density">By Evidence Density<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Evidence density</th><th>Notable data points</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>HD10437</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>EU directive 2023/970, June 7 2026 deadline, government proposal withdrawal</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>HD10434</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>11,091 units, Länsstyrelsen Stockholm source, year-on-year -900</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>HD10435</td><td>HIGH</td><td>1948 date, Folke Bernadotte ID, 3 specific demands, Israeli death-penalty law citation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD10433</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>3:12 system reference, Sweden billionaire per-capita</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD10438</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>"runt om i landet" (nationwide) — qualitative; would be HIGH with specific closures</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6–10</td><td>Others</td><td>MEDIUM / LOW</td><td>Thematic rather than quantitative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-by-coalition-stress-vector">By Coalition Stress Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-coalition-stress-vector"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-by-coalition-stress-vector">By Coalition Stress Vector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-by-coalition-stress-vector"></a></h4>
 <p>The interpellations place different amounts of stress on different coalition fault lines:</p>
 
 
@@ -4458,18 +4458,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-by-coalition-stress-vector">By Coalition Stress Vector<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Fault line</th><th>Stressed by</th><th align="center">Level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L ↔ Gender equality brand vs coalition inaction</td><td>HD10437, HD10438</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>KD ↔ Infrastructure competence vs S saturation</td><td>HD10434 (+ HD10424, HD10428, etc.)</td><td align="center">🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>M ↔ Foreign-policy pragmatism vs historical accountability</td><td>HD10435</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>M ↔ Tax doctrine vs fairness critique</td><td>HD10433</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>M–L ↔ Progressive HR vs SD pressure</td><td>HD10431</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>M ↔ Security vs liberty</td><td>HD10429</td><td align="center">🟡 LOW–MED</td></tr><tr><td>SD–KD ↔ Religious oversight instruments</td><td>HD10430</td><td align="center">🟡 LOW–MED</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-classification-patterns">Strategic Classification Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-classification-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing">Pattern 1: Amloh Dual-Filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-classification-patterns">Strategic Classification Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-classification-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing">Pattern 1: Amloh Dual-Filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1-amloh-dual-filing"></a></h4>
 <p>Two interpellations filed by the same MP (Sofia Amloh, S) on the same day against the same minister (Nina Larsson, L) on related themes. <strong>Frequency of such dual-filings in rm 2025/26</strong>: This is the first observed instance. This is the defining coordination signal of the wave.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation">Pattern 2: Carlson Saturation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation">Pattern 2: Carlson Saturation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2-carlson-saturation"></a></h4>
 <p>Andreas Carlson (KD) is the target of 6+ active interpellations in this session across 5 distinct policy sub-areas (housing, aviation, rail, roads, defence infrastructure). <strong>Frequency</strong>: Unprecedented in the 2022–2026 Tidö government. Previous most-targeted minister was the 2023 Justice Minister with 4 interpellations over 6 weeks.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation">Pattern 3: Independent-MP Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation">Pattern 3: Independent-MP Escalation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3-independent-mp-escalation"></a></h4>
 <p>Jamal El-Haj (-) — former S, now independent — filing a high-impact foreign-policy interpellation with specific demands. <strong>Frequency</strong>: Rare but not unprecedented. The independent platform allows demands that a party-affiliated MP would not make (for party-discipline reasons).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure">Pattern 4: SD Inverted Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure">Pattern 4: SD Inverted Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4-sd-inverted-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p>SD filed two interpellations simultaneously on opposite speech-regulation sides (HD10429 free-speech against M; HD10430 religious-extremism against KD). <strong>Frequency</strong>: Deliberate pattern; signals SD's "balanced agenda-setting" brand positioning.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal">Pattern 5: Tactical Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal">Pattern 5: Tactical Withdrawal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-5-tactical-withdrawal"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10436 withdrawn by S after filing. <strong>Frequency</strong>: Rare; typically 1–3 per session out of 400+ filings. Signals either informal resolution or tactical re-prioritisation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-confidence-audit">Classification Confidence Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-confidence-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-confidence-audit">Classification Confidence Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-confidence-audit"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 10 documents assigned to Tier 1/2/3 with explicit evidence</li>
 <li>All classifications cross-checked against document full text (where available)</li>
@@ -4479,10 +4479,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-confidence-audit">Classification Confidence Audit<a cl
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Overall classification confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (primary-source evidence for 5 of 10; metadata evidence for 5)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Purpose</strong>: Connect interpellations to policy patterns, minister records, and prior session events</p>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters">Thematic Cross-Reference Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance">Cluster 1: Gender Equality &#x26; EU Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters">Thematic Cross-Reference Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance">Cluster 1: Gender Equality &#x26; EU Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:437 (HD10437) ─── Pay Transparency Directive failure ─── Nina Larsson (L)
 frs 2025/26:438 (HD10438) ─── Women's shelter closures ─────────── Nina Larsson (L)
      │
@@ -4491,7 +4491,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-1-gender-equality--eu-compliance">Cluster 1: Gender Equality
      └── Both SISVA 2026-05-05 = synchronized response deadlines
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Supporting context</strong>: Sweden has a persistent gender pay gap. EU directive gives structural mechanism to address it. Government withdrawal of implementation = documented policy failure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability">Cluster 2: Andreas Carlson Infrastructure Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability">Cluster 2: Andreas Carlson Infrastructure Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:434 (HD10434) ─── Stockholm housing decline (-900 units)
 frs 2025/26:428 (HD10428) ─── Scandinavian Mountain Airport emergency base [from prev batch]
 frs 2025/26:425 (HD10425) ─── Defense infrastructure costs [from prev batch]
@@ -4500,23 +4500,23 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-2-andreas-carlson-infrastructure-accountability">Cluster 2: A
 frs 2025/26:417 (HD10417) ─── Södra stambanan double track [from prev batch]
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Six+ interpellations targeting Carlson over 4 weeks. S is building a comprehensive "infrastructure failure" narrative. Each interpellation adds a new failure domain: airports, rail, roads, housing, defense logistics.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights">Cluster 3: Foreign Policy &#x26; Human Rights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights">Cluster 3: Foreign Policy &#x26; Human Rights<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-foreign-policy--human-rights"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:435 (HD10435) ─── Folke Bernadotte/Israel (El-Haj, -) ─── Malmer Stenergard (M)
 frs 2025/26:431 (HD10431) ─── LGBTQ+ rights/foreign aid (Lasses, C) ─ Benjamin Dousa (M)
 frs 2025/26:426 (HD10426) ─── Israel death penalty (prev batch) ──── Malmer Stenergard (M)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Two independent streams targeting Swedish foreign policy on Israel-Palestine and human rights. El-Haj connects HD10435 explicitly to HD10426 (citing same Israeli death penalty legislation). This creates a thematic arc across multiple sessions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure">Cluster 4: Healthcare &#x26; Social Infrastructure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure">Cluster 4: Healthcare &#x26; Social Infrastructure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-healthcare--social-infrastructure"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:432 (HD10432) ─── Hospital building investment crisis ─── Elisabet Lann (KD)
 frs 2025/26:415 (HD10415) ─── Statligt säkerställande av bra vård [from prev batch] ─ Lann (KD)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: S's Robert Olesen has now filed two interpellations against the same KD health minister on related hospital infrastructure topics. Clear coordinated strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract">Cluster 5: Economic Policy &#x26; Social Contract<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract">Cluster 5: Economic Policy &#x26; Social Contract<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5-economic-policy--social-contract"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>frs 2025/26:433 (HD10433) ─── Tax reform (S) ──────────────────── Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 frs 2025/26:421 (HD10421) ─── Integration policy (S) [prev batch] ─ Svantesson (M)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Svantesson (M) faces attacks on both tax fairness and integration policy — the economic and social dimensions of the pre-election debate.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-minister-response-status">Minister Response Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-response-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-minister-response-status">Minister Response Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-minister-response-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4587,18 +4587,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-minister-response-status">Minister Response Status<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Minister</th><th>Party</th><th>Active Interpellations</th><th>Responses Received</th><th>Response Rate</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Andreas Carlson</td><td>KD</td><td>6+</td><td>0 (all "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Nina Larsson</td><td>L</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard</td><td>M</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabeth Svantesson</td><td>M</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Elisabet Lann</td><td>KD</td><td>2</td><td>0 (both "Skickad")</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Benjamin Dousa</td><td>M</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Jakob Forssmed</td><td>KD</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer</td><td>M</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>NOTE</strong>: All interpellations have status "Skickad" (sent). No minister responses recorded yet. This reflects the statutory timeline — responses are due April 29 to May 5. Search for anföranden by minister names returned no results, confirming no formal responses have been given in chamber debates yet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes">MCP Cross-Reference Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes">MCP Cross-Reference Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-cross-reference-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>search_anforanden</code> for minister names (Nina Larsson, Maria Malmer Stenergard) returned 0 results — consistent with "Skickad" status</li>
 <li><code>get_calendar_events</code> returned HTML instead of JSON (API known issue) — debate scheduling cannot be confirmed via API</li>
 <li><code>get_sync_status</code> confirmed live data as of 2026-04-20 07:14 UTC</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Workflow</strong>: <code>news-interpellations</code> (agentic workflow) + reference-class expansion
 <strong>AI-FIRST iterations</strong>: 2 (pass 1 + pass 2 improvement), plus post-review expansion pass
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Document the analytic pipeline, its strengths and limitations, and lessons for future interpellation-debates runs</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pipeline-overview">Pipeline Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pipeline-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pipeline-overview">Pipeline Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pipeline-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Trigger: scheduled agentic workflow] --> B[MCP data pull: riksdag-regering-mcp]
     B --> C[get_interpellationer, rm=2025/26]
@@ -4624,7 +4624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pipeline-overview">Pipeline Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     S --> W[Per-document deep dives 10/10]
     T &#x26; U &#x26; V &#x26; W --> X[Updated artifacts + articles]
     X --> Y[Final review + publish]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources-and-provenance">Data Sources and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-and-provenance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources-and-provenance">Data Sources and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-and-provenance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4685,7 +4685,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-sources-and-provenance">Data Sources and Provenance<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Purpose</th><th>Status</th><th align="center">Confidence grade</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_interpellationer</code></td><td>Interpellation list, metadata</td><td>✅ Worked</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_dokument_innehall</code></td><td>Full text</td><td>✅ Worked for HD10437, HD10438, HD10435, HD10434, HD10433</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>search_anforanden</code></td><td>Minister response speeches</td><td>✅ Returned 0 results — <strong>confirming no responses yet</strong> (status "Skickad")</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_calendar_events</code></td><td>Chamber scheduling</td><td>⚠️ Returned HTML instead of JSON (known API issue)</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr><tr><td><code>riksdag-regering-mcp</code> — <code>get_ledamot</code></td><td>MP details</td><td>✅ Worked</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>world-bank-mcp</code> — economic indicators</td><td>Macro context</td><td>✅ Worked (SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS, NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG, FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_regering</code> (Regeringskansliet)</td><td>Government-side docs</td><td>✅ Worked</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>European Commission DG EMPL</td><td>Directive transposition tracking</td><td>⚠️ External source, not via MCP</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4762,9 +4762,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Technique
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Technique</th><th>Artifact</th><th>Value delivered</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong> (policy-domain + party-strategy)</td><td><code>classification-results.md</code></td><td>Taxonomy of the wave</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Significance scoring</strong> (multi-dimensional)</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td>Ranked prioritisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SWOT</strong> (8-stakeholder)</td><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td>Perspective coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Risk matrix</strong> (L × I, 1–5)</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td>Quantitative prioritisation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat analysis</strong></td><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td>Adversarial mapping</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder mapping</strong> (minister × opposition × institutional)</td><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td>Multi-actor view</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-reference / thematic clustering</strong></td><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></td><td>Pattern detection</td></tr><tr><td><strong>ACH</strong> — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>Hypothesis discrimination</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Key Assumptions Check</strong></td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>Bias surface</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Red Team / Devil's Advocate</strong></td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>Alternative-view stress</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scenario analysis</strong> (4 futures, 2-axis morphology)</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td>Uncertainty structuring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Comparative international</strong></td><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td>Peer-benchmark</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Per-document deep dives</strong> (10)</td><td><code>documents/*.md</code></td><td>Granular evidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-first-iteration-log">AI-FIRST Iteration Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-first-iteration-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-first-iteration-log">AI-FIRST Iteration Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-first-iteration-log"></a></h3>
 <p>The AI-FIRST principle mandates <strong>minimum 2 complete iterations</strong> with genuine critical re-evaluation between iterations.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute">Pass 1 — Initial generation (~45 minutes of allocated compute)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute">Pass 1 — Initial generation (~45 minutes of allocated compute)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Generated 9 top-level artifacts</li>
 <li>Generated 3 per-document analyses (HD10435, HD10437, HD10438 only — highest significance)</li>
@@ -4781,13 +4781,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1--initial-generation-45-minutes-of-allocated-compute">Pass 1 
 <li>Red Team: partial (in SWOT 'threats' column only)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-20 07:16 UTC<br>
 <strong>Analysis Type</strong>: interpellations<br>
 <strong>Article Date</strong>: 2026-04-20<br>
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26<br>
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: riksdag-regering-mcp (get_interpellationer, get_dokument, get_dokument_innehall, World Bank)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14">Key Documents Analyzed (New Since Last Run 2026-04-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14">Key Documents Analyzed (New Since Last Run 2026-04-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4893,7 +4893,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-documents-analyzed-new-since-last-run-2026-04-14">Key Documents A
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>frs ID</th><th>Titel</th><th>Datum</th><th>Inlämnare</th><th>Mottagare</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>frs 2025/26:438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Sofia Amloh (S)</td><td>Nina Larsson (L)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>frs 2025/26:437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Sofia Amloh (S)</td><td>Nina Larsson (L)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10436</td><td>frs 2025/26:436</td><td>Åtgärder för att stärka den svenska rymdbranschen</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Mats Wiking (S)</td><td>Lotta Edholm (L)</td><td><strong>ÅTERTAGEN</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD10435</td><td>frs 2025/26:435</td><td>Mordet på Folke Bernadotte</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Jamal El-Haj (-)</td><td>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>frs 2025/26:434</td><td>Bostadsbyggandet i Stockholmsregionen</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Leif Nysmed (S)</td><td>Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>frs 2025/26:433</td><td>En bred skatteöversyn</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Ida Ekeroth Clausson (S)</td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>frs 2025/26:432</td><td>Statligt säkerställande av investeringar i vårdbyggnader</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Robert Olesen (S)</td><td>Elisabet Lann (KD)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10431</td><td>frs 2025/26:431</td><td>Internationellt arbete för hbtqi-personers mänskliga rättigheter</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Anna Lasses (C)</td><td>Benjamin Dousa (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td>frs 2025/26:430</td><td>Moskéer som sprider hat och hot</td><td>2026-04-07</td><td>Richard Jomshof (SD)</td><td>Jakob Forssmed (KD)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>frs 2025/26:429</td><td>Skyddet för yttrandefriheten</td><td>2026-04-07</td><td>Rashid Farivar (SD)</td><td>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Skickad</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-response-deadlines">Response Deadlines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-deadlines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-response-deadlines">Response Deadlines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-response-deadlines"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4936,8 +4936,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-response-deadlines">Response Deadlines<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Sista svarsdatum</th><th>Days Remaining</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10435</td><td>2026-04-30</td><td>10 days</td><td>🔴 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>2026-04-29</td><td>9 days</td><td>🔴 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>2026-04-29</td><td>9 days</td><td>🔴 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>2026-05-05</td><td>15 days</td><td>🟡 NEAR</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>2026-05-05</td><td>15 days</td><td>🟡 NEAR</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-calendar-api-status">Calendar API Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-api-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-calendar-api-status">Calendar API Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-api-status"></a></h3>
 <p>Calendar API returned HTML instead of JSON (known Riksdagen API issue). ANM date for HD10437/HD10438 is 2026-04-21 (tomorrow).</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10430-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10430-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10431-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10431-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10432-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10432-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10433-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10433-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10434-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10434-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10435-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10435-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10436-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10436-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10437-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10437-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/documents/HD10438-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10438-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -4985,7 +5013,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:05.721Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:27.132Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html b/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html
index c61f0d38ac..505b568ee9 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.997Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:27.429Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:05.997Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:27.429Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-20T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:05.997Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:27.429Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -229,10 +229,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Audience</strong></td><td>Editors-in-chief · political advisors · party whips · newsroom planners</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading time</strong></td><td>3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed <strong>21 coordinated counter-motions</strong> against the government's spring legislative package — the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive of the 2025/26 riksmöte</strong>. The <strong>headline finding</strong> is a historically rare <strong>four-party convergence on a single proposition</strong> (prop. 2025/26:229, <em>New Reception Law</em>) within 72 hours, with each party filing a distinct but mutually reinforcing frame. This establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-things-to-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-things-to-know"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>This is campaign-narrative construction, not coalition rehearsal.</strong> ACH analysis assigns P=0.50 to the campaign-narrative hypothesis vs P=0.35 to coalition-rehearsal. The opposition is locking in timestamped talking points before the summer recess, not preparing to govern.</p>
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidd
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Cluster
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th>Parties</th><th>Watch Out For</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td><strong>Reception Law (4-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande Q2 2026; L backbench sympathy for C's phased amendment</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td><strong>Deportation (3-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>V, C, MP (not S)</td><td>C's statutory proportionality test converges with European mainstream — realistic SfU amendment path</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>S, MP</td><td>Only Germany 2022 Tankrabatt is direct precedent — did not extend. Klimatlagen §5 accountability trigger.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td>V, MP</td><td>Post-NATO positioning; MP's end-user review language aligns with Norway/Netherlands/Germany — mainstream, not outlier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Proba
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Opposition outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 BASE — Government retained, all 4 propositions enacted</td><td align="center"><strong>0.45</strong></td><td>Campaign material only; no reversal within electoral horizon</td></tr><tr><td>🔵 BULL — S-led minority, reception-law partial reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.22</strong></td><td>Partial win: reception + fuel tax reversed; deportation retained</td></tr><tr><td>🔴 BEAR (for government) — S+V+MP+C majority, full reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td><td>Full package reversed; C's HD024095 language adopted statutorily</td></tr><tr><td>⚡ WILDCARD — Inconclusive election / snap re-election</td><td align="center"><strong>0.05</strong></td><td>Motion package becomes amendment-by-amendment negotiation currency</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Why it matters</th><th>Update signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R01</strong> Polarisation lock-in (L×I=25)</td><td>Government has 62% voter support floor on immigration; opposition narrative capped below that floor</td><td>Novus monthly migration-salience polling</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R08</strong> Unemployment context (L×I=16)</td><td>8.69% unemployment 2025 amplifies anti-immigration framing</td><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB, May 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R07</strong> C as pivot party (L×I=12)</td><td>C's HD024095 proportionality amendment could break 4-party front if negotiated</td><td>C leader public statement on SfU amendment posture</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Signal</th><th>What to prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td>Amendment-vote sequencing guidance</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C leader public statement on HD024095</td><td>Updated risk R07 scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union statement on fuel tax</td><td>Rural-voter risk R03 update</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235</td><td>Full cluster scoring update</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>BASE / BULL / BEAR scenario Bayesian update</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Re
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Four opposition parties file coordinated counter-motions against immigration package — historically rare"</td><td>Dok_ids HD024076/80/87/89 within 72 h</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"S's anti-privatisation stance on asylum housing aligns with Nordic peer practice — Sweden is the outlier"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"C's proportionality amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland statutory practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §2</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt — the only peer precedent for Sweden's fuel-tax cut — was not extended"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"MP's arms-export end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, post-2021 German practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Opposition is coalition-ready for post-2026 government" — ACH P=0.35 only; Red-Team critique applies</li>
 <li>❌ "Four-party coordination means S+V+MP+C majority is likely after election" — BEAR scenario P=0.10</li>
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually W
 <li>❌ "Fuel-tax opposition is anti-working-class" — S's HD024082 is a <em>return-with-new-proposal</em> motion, not a cost-of-living rejection</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deeper-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deeper-reading"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Full ACH + Red-Team + cross-cluster interference</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — 4-party division of labour</li>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -493,38 +493,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:10 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Significance</strong></td><td>9.0/10 (Raw) · <strong>9.40 DIW-weighted</strong> on LEAD cluster</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td>PUBLISH IMMEDIATELY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority</strong></td><td><strong>P1</strong> (electoral/policy decisive)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Quality Tier</strong></td><td>🏆 <strong>REFERENCE EXEMPLAR</strong> for opposition-motion analysis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Next Review</strong></td><td>2026-04-27</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 the Swedish opposition filed <strong>21 motions</strong> concentrated in <strong>four coordinated clusters</strong>. The April 2026 wave is the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive</strong> of the 2025/26 riksmöte and establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. Four of the clusters cross filing-time thresholds that constitute <em>prima facie</em> evidence of coordination: the reception-law cluster sees <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions to a single proposition within <strong>72 hours</strong> — historically rare and the headline finding of this dossier. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p>The dominant strategic-logic hypothesis (ACH: P=0.50) is <strong>campaign-narrative construction</strong> rather than coalition-rehearsal or opportunistic signalling. The opposition is using the final pre-election Riksdag cycle to <strong>lock in timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer recess. This distinguishes the April 2026 wave from prior clusters. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Twenty-one opposition motions filed between April 13–17, 2026 represent the most coordinated parliamentary opposition offensive in the current riksmöte. In an historically rare manoeuvre, all four major opposition parties — <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>, <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>, <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>, and <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> — simultaneously filed counter-motions against the government's flagship immigration legislation package, signalling that immigration policy will be the defining battleground of Sweden's September 2026 election.</p>
 <p>The motions target three simultaneous government propositions on immigration (prop. 2025/26:229, 2025/26:235, and 2025/26:215) while also challenging the government's environmentally inconsistent fuel tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236), arms export expansion (prop. 2025/26:228), and healthcare and justice reforms. Sweden's deteriorating economic context — with unemployment rising to 8.69% in 2025 and GDP growth slowing to 0.82% in 2024 — frames a policy environment in which the government has electoral advantage on immigration but exposure on climate credibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 (New Reception Law) within a 72-hour window. <strong>Dok_ids</strong>: HD024076 (V, Tony Haddou), HD024080 (S, Ida Karkiainen), HD024087 (MP, Annika Hirvonen), HD024089 (C, Niels Paarup-Petersen). The filings are a <strong>deliberate division of labour</strong>: V stakes the principled-left position, S anchors welfare-state protection (anti-privatisation), MP internationalises via EU Pact compatibility, C occupies pragmatist-centrist ground with a phased amendment.</p>
 <p>The absence of a joint press conference is strategic: <strong>claimed coordination would attract "coalition of chaos" framing</strong>, whereas parallel messaging projects discipline without vulnerability. Analytically, the division-of-labour pattern survives every available attack vector — a Tidö-aligned attack on V's frame fails against C; an attack on C fails against S. <strong>This is defence-in-depth messaging</strong>, a hallmark of mature opposition tradecraft. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportation — V outright rejection HD024090, C proportionality amendment HD024095, MP partial rejection HD024097) and three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:215 (time-limited housing — V HD024077, S HD024079, MP HD024086). Total immigration motions: <strong>10 of 21 (48%)</strong> — the opposition has made immigration its primary electoral narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>New analytic observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>S is silent on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) while filing on every other immigration track. This is a <strong>revealed strategic choice</strong>: S has concluded that deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party in the current public-opinion environment (70%+ support deportation of convicted foreigners per SOM 2025). The silence signals S's 2026 campaign architecture — <strong>own the economic-welfare immigration narrative, avoid the security-enforcement narrative</strong>. This materially changes post-election coalition calculus: S is not a reliable ECHR-litigation partner post-adoption.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h4>
 <p>S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose the fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. With Sweden's GDP growth at only 0.82% (2024) and 2023 at –0.2%, the government's choice to cut fuel taxes in a supplementary budget creates a credibility gap on climate.</p>
 <p><strong>Quantified climate impact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cut is estimated to add <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> to a 2030 trajectory Sweden is already ~20% behind (Naturvårdsverket 2025). Under Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5, the government must explain incompatibility to parliament — this creates a statutory basis for ongoing challenge by Klimatpolitiska rådet. MP's HD024098 anchors this claim.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative precedent <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut — and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> due to poor electoral payoff.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h4>
 <p>V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation modernization. V's motion explicitly requests rejection of the entire proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports including follow-up deliveries to human rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-NATO context <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024. Public opinion on arms exports has shifted to 58/32/10 favourable (SOM 2025) from 45/45/10 (2021). The cluster is therefore <strong>low electoral consequence but high post-election negotiation value</strong>: if any 2026–2030 government configuration requires V or MP support, HD024091/96 positions become immediate coalition constraints. MP's end-user review language (HD024096) is aligned with Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice — <strong>mainstream Northern European, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h4>
 <p>Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject prop. 2025/26:216 on medical competence in municipal healthcare. C's opposition is the most striking given its centre-right profile — the party argues the reform reduces municipal flexibility and should be redesigned.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-2026 coalition signal <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: S+V+C convergence on healthcare governance is a rehearsal for a potential post-election minority-government working relationship. Coupled with C's amendment position on deportation (HD024095), this is the strongest coalition-rehearsal signal in the cluster.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Counter-hypothesis</strong>: What if the entire cluster has negligible strategic value?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — D
 <p><strong>Red-Team posterior</strong>: The cluster's expected value is <strong>tactical (talking-points, media cycle control)</strong> rather than <strong>strategic (coalition-rehearsal, government-formation preparation)</strong>. The dossier's findings remain valid but the <strong>political-consequence magnitude should be calibrated down</strong>: this is a good campaign input, not a realignment event.</p>
 <p><strong>Integration with main analysis</strong>: We accept the Red-Team critique at 30% weight. It modifies the narrative — this is <strong>the best-coordinated tactical opposition offensive of the riksmöte</strong>, but it is not a strategic re-alignment. See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5 for the scenario-tree consequences.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fiscal, defence, healthcare), rhetorical interference between clusters creates exploitable vectors.</p>
 
 
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference
 <p><strong>Critical finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>"V universal rejectionist"</strong> frame (rows 1, 6) is V's single largest electoral vulnerability. V must sequence its rhetoric to pair rejection with concrete alternatives (e.g., border-capacity investment, Ukraine-lethal-aid affirmation) or lose 1–2 polling points to SD attack ads. V's HD024076, HD024090, and HD024091 texts currently all lead with principled-rejection language; SD will highlight this uniformity.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypoth
 <p>Full ACH analysis: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §1</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessme
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td>Immigration becomes binary-choice election — government "border security" vs opposition "humanitarian alternative"</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition Scenarios</td><td>Current M/SD/KD/L majority retained P=0.50; S-led minority P=0.33; S+V+MP+C majority P=0.12</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Voter Salience</td><td>62% of Swedes support stricter immigration — government has current polling advantage</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Campaign Vulnerability</td><td>Government exposed on climate (fuel tax) and healthcare (3-party opposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Legacy</td><td>If government wins 2026, all four propositions become law and define a decade</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster Value to Opposition</td><td>Tactical (talking points) ≫ Strategic (coalition rehearsal)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (Red-Team adjusted)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government will pass all four immigration+fiscal propositions (prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Immigration will be #1 election issue in 2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax opposition will provide opposition climate narrative</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C will negotiate on deportation proportionality in SfU</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>S will file follow-on motion on 2026–2027 deportation legislation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (P≈0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition forms alternative majority after 2026</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW (P=0.12)</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR issues pilot-judgment vs Sweden within 5 years post-adoption of 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Updates which analysis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> RR1</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C-leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> DR4</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union public position (Transportarbetareförbundet) on fuel tax</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> FR4</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Reception RR2, scenario BULL prior</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Deportation DR5, scenario prior</td></tr><tr><td>May–June 2026</td><td>SfU/FiU/UU chamber votes</td><td>All clusters — locks in BASE scenario</td></tr><tr><td>Rolling</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>Cross-cluster political-consequence magnitude</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>:
 "Four Opposition Parties Unite Against Sweden's Immigration Package in Unprecedented Parliamentary Challenge"</p>
 <p><strong>Alternative Title (EN)</strong>:
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadat
 <p><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>:
 "S, V, MP och C lämnar samordnade motioner mot tre invandringspropositioner medan Socialdemokraterna också utmanar regeringens sänkning av bränsleskatten inför 2026 års val."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a cl
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) multiplier applied per-cluster based on legislative axis (constitutional / electoral / policy / fiscal / international); (2) per-dimension sensitivity analysis ±10%; (3) confidence-weighted ranking.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok_id(s)</th><th>Topic</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW mult.</th><th align="center"><strong>DIW score</strong></th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Electoral</th><th align="center">Coalition risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89</td><td><strong>New Reception Law</strong> — 4-party</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">×0.94</td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td>HD024090/95/97</td><td><strong>Stricter Deportation</strong> — 3-party</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">×0.98</td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td>HD024077/79/86</td><td>Time-Limited Housing — 3-party</td><td align="center">8.8</td><td align="center">×0.93</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD024082/98</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax Cut</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">8.3</td><td align="center">×0.99</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD024091/96</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">7.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>HD024078/84/85</td><td>Crime-Victim Compensation</td><td align="center">7.2</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>HD024081/83/94</td><td>Municipal Healthcare Competence</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>6.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>HD024088</td><td>Consumer Credit Law</td><td align="center">5.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>5.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h3>
 <p>Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects <strong>how much the legislative axis changes the political-system reality</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -1114,8 +1114,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact We
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Multiplier</th><th>Reasoning</th><th>Applied clusters</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td>Highest; alters state powers / rights</td><td>— (none in this cluster set)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral-definitional</strong></td><td align="center">0.98</td><td>Defines a campaign narrative that shapes voter choice</td><td>Deportation (×0.98)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy-defining</strong></td><td align="center">0.94</td><td>Establishes policy architecture persistent ≥ 2 legislative cycles</td><td>Reception (×0.94)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal / climate</strong></td><td align="center">0.99</td><td>Near-full weight; immediate budget + climate-trajectory effects</td><td>Fuel tax (×0.99)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International / defence-industrial</strong></td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>High but conditional on coalition formation</td><td>Arms export (×0.97)</td></tr><tr><td>Social-policy adjustment</td><td align="center">0.93</td><td>Significant but narrower policy scope</td><td>Housing (×0.93)</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory / sectoral</td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>Narrow; affects specific sector only</td><td>Consumer credit (×0.97)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Why DIW matters</strong>: Raw scoring treats all 10-point policy impacts identically. DIW discounts narrower-scope reforms while preserving the full weight of electoral-definitional ones. The result is a <strong>ranking that reflects decision-consequence for the 2026 election</strong>, not merely policy novelty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception L
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Replaces 1994 reception act; introduces private-operator clauses + duty architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>4-party filing within 72 h — unprecedented in current riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Immigration #1 issue in Novus Q1 2026; 62% voter stricter-immigration support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Virtually guaranteed front-page story in SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Government majority; opposition cannot defeat but can amend (C's proportionality)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>10.0/10</strong></td><td>Mean across dimensions (normalised to 10)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.94 (policy-defining axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Dep
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Expands deportation criteria significantly; ECHR proportionality concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>3-party (V+C+MP); <strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Deportation is SD's flagship issue; government-advantage terrain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Tabloid-friendly; C's proportionality amendment drives nuance coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">7/10</td><td>Government majority; C amendment realistic path via L backbench</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.0/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.98 (electoral-definitional axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 20
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Budget-line impact; ~0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year trajectory impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">6/10</td><td>2-party (S+MP); V notably absent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Cost-of-living 74% Novus Q1 2026 priority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Regional media angle (Norrland rural split)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Extra-budget fast-track; definitional government outcome</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.3/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.99 (fiscal/climate axis — near-full weight)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1310,8 +1310,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivi
 <p><strong>Sensitivity verdict <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The LEAD story (reception law) is robust against all tested perturbations. Ranks 3–4 (fuel tax / housing) are tied within uncertainty bands — either could be elevated with minor coordination evidence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-story-decision"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-decision"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this leads</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Historical rarity</strong> — 4-party coordination on single proposition within 72 h is unprecedented in current riksmöte</li>
@@ -1319,14 +1319,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW
 <li><strong>Policy impact</strong> — replaces a 31-year-old reception act with new architecture</li>
 <li><strong>Division-of-labour messaging</strong> — each party occupies distinct rhetorical space, defence-in-depth narrative</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this co-leads despite lower raw</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Electoral-definitional axis</strong> (DIW ×0.98) — nearly full weight</li>
 <li><strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong> — a rare case where <strong>absence</strong> of evidence is primary evidence</li>
 <li><strong>C's statutory proportionality amendment is the most legally-workable opposition motion</strong> in the entire wave</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why secondary</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Climate-fiscal contradiction</strong> provides the opposition's strongest government-credibility attack</li>
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW
 <li>Narrative carries cleanly into summer 2026 European Parliament Fit-for-55 review cycle</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metad
 <p><strong>Article decision</strong>: PUBLISH — CRITICAL political intelligence
 <strong>Article priority</strong>: <strong>P1</strong> (Immediate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — BLUF builds from LEAD cluster</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — scenario priors use DIW-weighted ranks</li>
@@ -1388,17 +1388,17 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:07 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026, with special focus on the immigration cluster (10 motions), fuel tax/climate cluster (2 motions), and arms export cluster (2 motions).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary concerns</strong>: Cost of living, housing, employment security, public safety
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: HIGH — immigration, fuel costs, healthcare all directly affect citizens</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Rural Swedes</strong> (fuel tax): Government's fuel tax cut benefits rural citizens who depend on cars. S's opposition (HD024082) risks alienating this group. Approximately 30% of Swedish workforce commutes by car in rural areas.</li>
 <li><strong>Welfare-dependent citizens</strong> (reception law): The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) affects S's and MP's core voter base — those who believe in comprehensive public services for asylum seekers.</li>
@@ -1407,10 +1407,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — citizen polling data consistently shows immigration as #1 concern</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Will pass all three immigration propositions plus extra budget
 <strong>Motivation</strong>: Tidö agreement mandate + electoral positioning for 2026</p>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong>: Supports all three immigration propositions as part of Tidö agreement. Welcomes the opposition's unified rejection — it confirms M's electoral thesis that only the right-of-centre coalition will enforce Sweden's borders.</li>
 <li><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong>: Strongly supports stricter deportation (HD024090/95/97 motivate their base by showing "the establishment is defending criminals"). New reception law validates SD's decade-long campaign.</li>
@@ -1419,9 +1419,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — coalition voting patterns are predictable</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Coordinated challenge on immigration, fiscal, and defense policy</p>
-<h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> — 6 motions (HD024079/80/82/84/78/81):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Magdalena Andersson's S is pursuing a two-track strategy: (1) accepting some security reform (not opposing deportation outright) while (2) protecting welfare state principles (anti-privatization in HD024080, integration investment in HD024079)</li>
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sectors affected</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Transport/Logistics</strong>: Opposes S+MP fuel tax position; benefits from government's fuel tax cut</li>
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Key conflict</strong>: Transport industry backs government on fuel tax; financial sector cautiously supports C on consumer credit amendment. The business community is fragmented on these motions, with no unified position.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Organizations most vocal</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong>: Opposes prop. 2025/26:229 (new reception law) — supports S, V, MP, C counter-motions</li>
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Civil society is the most organized constituency supporting opposition motions</strong> on immigration.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>EU Commission concerns</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) must comply with EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024)</li>
@@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — EU enforcement timeline is long; NATO pressure is real but informal</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional dimensions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Proportionality in deportation</strong>: C's HD024095 is legally robust — "systematic repeated offenses over time" aligns with ECHR Article 8. If the government ignores this, administrative courts may strike down individual deportation orders.</li>
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a c
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Council on Legislation) has been consulted on all three immigration propositions. Opposition motions reflect areas where Lagrådet expressed reservations.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — constitutional review bodies have long timelines</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Dominant media narrative</strong> (expected coverage):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SVT Nyheter</strong>: "Fyra partier mot ny mottagandelag" (Four parties against new reception law) — likely to be front-page story</li>
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Swedish media behavior on immigration stories is well-established</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Supports["Supports Opposition Motions"]
         CS[Civil Society 🌿&#x3C;br/>Strong support]
@@ -1543,9 +1543,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class=
     style GOV fill:#dc3545,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#007bff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h3>
 <p>Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the influence-network analysis below. Listing is grouped by role category.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamenta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key motion(s)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Ida Karkiainen</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024080</td><td>Reception privatisation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Ardalan Shekarabi</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024079</td><td>Time-limited housing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024082</td><td>Fuel-tax fiscal framing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tony Haddou</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024076</td><td>Reception rights frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Håkan Svenneling</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024091</td><td>Arms-export rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>Janine Alm Ericson</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Party leader + HD024098</td><td>Fuel-tax climate frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>Annika Hirvonen</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024087</td><td>EU Pact compatibility</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>Jacob Risberg</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024096</td><td>Arms end-user review</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td><strong>Niels Paarup-Petersen</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Lead signatory HD024089/95</td><td>Phased amendment + proportionality</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td><strong>Martin Ådahl</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Economic-policy spokesperson</td><td>HD024088 consumer credit</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key decision point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">13</td><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Prime Minister</td><td>Government-wide messaging discipline</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong></td><td align="center">SD</td><td>Tidö signatory</td><td>SD attack-ad strategy owner</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong></td><td align="center">KD</td><td>Deputy PM</td><td>Crime-victim / parent-liability tension</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong></td><td align="center">L</td><td>Tidö party leader</td><td><strong>🔶 Weak link</strong> — rule-of-law sensitivity on proportionality</td></tr><tr><td align="center">17</td><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Migration minister</td><td>Reception-law defence + SfU engagement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Institution</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">18</td><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Council on Legislation</td><td>Yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235 (Q2 2026) — single most consequential pending signal</td></tr><tr><td align="center">19</td><td><strong>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</strong></td><td>Riksdag committee</td><td>Potential constitutional review</td></tr><tr><td align="center">20</td><td><strong>Migrationsöverdomstolen</strong></td><td>Migration Court of Appeal</td><td>Post-adoption administrative review venue</td></tr><tr><td align="center">21</td><td><strong>ECtHR (Strasbourg)</strong></td><td>European Court of Human Rights</td><td>3–5 year pilot-judgment potential on deportation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role in this cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">22</td><td><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong></td><td>Joint remissvar on prop. 2025/26:229 expected</td></tr><tr><td align="center">23</td><td><strong>Rädda Barnen</strong></td><td>Child-welfare concerns on private-operator reception</td></tr><tr><td align="center">24</td><td><strong>Amnesty Sverige</strong></td><td>Critical brief on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">25</td><td><strong>Caritas Sverige</strong></td><td>Reception-law humanitarian coalition</td></tr><tr><td align="center">26</td><td><strong>RFSL</strong></td><td>LGBTQ-asylum deportation concerns</td></tr><tr><td align="center">27</td><td><strong>Diakonia</strong></td><td>Arms-export human-rights advocacy</td></tr><tr><td align="center">28</td><td><strong>Svenska Freds- och Skiljedomsföreningen</strong></td><td>Arms-export policy critique</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business--industry"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Sector</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">29</td><td><strong>Saab AB (Linköping ~15k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Quiet pro-2025/26:228 lobbying; opposes V+MP cluster</td></tr><tr><td align="center">30</td><td><strong>BAE Systems Sweden (Karlskoga ~8k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Aligned with Saab on export flexibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center">31</td><td><strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong></td><td>Labour union</td><td><strong>🔶 Split risk</strong> — may publicly back government fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td align="center">32</td><td><strong>Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR)</strong></td><td>Municipal association</td><td>Concerned about reception-law municipal-capacity burden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">33</td><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet</strong></td><td>Annual Klimatlagen §5 accountability report — key fuel-tax lever</td></tr><tr><td align="center">34</td><td><strong>MSB (Myndigheten för samhällsskydd)</strong></td><td>Disinformation / CIB monitoring</td></tr><tr><td align="center">35</td><td><strong>FOI (Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut)</strong></td><td>Foreign-influence analysis</td></tr><tr><td align="center">36</td><td><strong>ISP (Inspektionen för strategiska produkter)</strong></td><td>Arms-export authorisation authority</td></tr><tr><td align="center">37</td><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket</strong></td><td>Climate-trajectory evidence base</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Actors tracked</strong>: 37 (minimum threshold: 20). ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph OppLeaders["Opposition Leaders"]
         MA["Magdalena Andersson S"]
@@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Clust
 <p><strong>Influence-network reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The key <strong>bridging nodes</strong> are (1) Paarup-Petersen's amendment path to Pehrson (L backbench) — the only opposition → Tidö bridge; (2) <strong>Lagrådet</strong> as the single institutional actor with power to change the government's substantive terms; (3) <strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong> as the split-risk node that could fragment S's working-class narrative on fuel tax. These three nodes deserve disproportionate monitoring effort.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fracture-probability-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h3>
 <p>Where can the opposition coalition fracture, and with what probability?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 Opposition coalition holds&#x3C;br/>through June 2026 chamber votes"]
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class=""
 <p><strong>Highest-probability fracture <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>F5</strong> (SD attack ads force V rejectionism revision). Opposition must execute <strong>M5</strong> (V pairs rejection with concrete alternative) as matter of priority. Next-highest: <strong>F1</strong> (C negotiates). Mitigation <strong>M1</strong> (amendment-first sequencing) addresses both F1 and F3 simultaneously — single highest-leverage move.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Cross-Cluster Interference — influence patterns</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS — stakeholder-informed strategy derivations</li>
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2037,7 +2037,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative ("opposition coordination builds toward 2026 electoral gain"), surface wildcards, and assign prior probabilities that can be updated as forward indicators fire.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <p>Applied to the central question: <em>What is the strategic logic of the April 14–17 opposition-motion wave?</em></p>
 
 
@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: T
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: The opposition's goal is not to prepare for government (too early, polls insufficient) but to <strong>lock in 2026 campaign narratives</strong> before the Riksdag recesses in summer 2026. Motions function as <strong>timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer silence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>Cluster filed"]
 
@@ -2132,8 +2132,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2
 <p>Probabilities are <strong>analyst priors</strong>, zero-sum within each branch. They update as Lagrådet yttranden, polling data, and SfU rapporteur reports arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: SfU/FiU/UU straight-reject opposition motions in May–June; government retains majority in September; all four propositions become law; opposition runs them as 2026–2030 campaign material but cannot reverse them.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BASE:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government R
 <li>Reputational: moderate (climate, possible ECtHR adverse deportation judgment)</li>
 <li>Electoral: favourable to government until 2030</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S-led minority with MP support (±V) but not C; reception-law partial reversal via amendment in Q1 2027. Deportation law retained (S silence locks in). Fuel tax cut reversed. Arms export framework unchanged.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BULL:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BUL
 <li>MP achieves symbolic but not decisive influence</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Partial victory for opposition narrative</strong>: reception and fuel tax reversed; deportation and arms retained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S+V+MP+C 175+ majority; full reversal of reception law, fuel tax, and partial reversal of deportation via statutory proportionality test (HD024095 adopted).</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BEAR-for-government:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Gov
 <li>Sweden climate 2030 target back within plausible range</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Low-probability but high-impact</strong>: requires simultaneous Tidö collapse and opposition discipline — historically rare.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces no 175+ majority configuration; months of negotiation; eventual minority government with no clear mandate. Motions cluster becomes <strong>negotiation currency</strong> rather than governing programme.</p>
 <p><strong>Consequences:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2200,7 +2200,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "M
 <li>Political system instability with 1-2 year horizon for re-election</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Opposition should prepare</th><th>Government should prepare</th><th>Newsroom should prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BASE</td><td>2026–2030 campaign narrative; post-adoption litigation strategy; NGO alliance</td><td>Implementation plan; defensive communications</td><td>Multi-year implementation tracker</td></tr><tr><td>BULL</td><td>Reception-law repeal legislation; coalition-agreement provisions</td><td>Damage-control communications; alternative legislation</td><td>S-leader interview series; legal-analysis series</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR</td><td>Full reversal legislation; new Reception Act drafting; statutory proportionality text</td><td>Post-loss narrative; policy-continuity carve-outs</td><td>Election-reversal analysis; comparative restoration precedents</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD</td><td>Amendment-by-amendment playbook</td><td>Holding-pattern communications</td><td>Minority-government instability explainer</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate</strong>: What if the entire cluster is strategically irrelevant?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a
 <p><strong>Integration</strong>: This Red-Team critique reduces the BASE scenario's political-consequence magnitude, not its probability. The overall scenario tree remains valid; the expected utility to the opposition shrinks.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update
 <p><strong>Update procedure</strong>: Re-score scenario tree when any of these signals fire. If posteriors shift the BASE/BULL/BEAR ranking, update <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>executive-brief.md</code> accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph EarlyNegotiation["Early Negotiation (May-June 2026)"]
         SfU["SfU votes&#x3C;br/>(Reception + Deportation + Housing)"]
@@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — C
     style Implementation fill:#1565C0,color:#FFF
     style Reversal fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — An
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H2 (campaign-narrative) as dominant hypothesis</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Fits evidence pattern; disconfirms available for H1/H3</td></tr><tr><td>BASE scenario probability (0.45)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Polling stable; no Tidö-collapse signals</td></tr><tr><td>BULL scenario probability (0.22)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>S-led minority is plausible but requires favourable polling swings</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR scenario probability (0.10)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historically rare; requires Tidö collapse + opposition unity</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD probability (0.05)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Minority-gov volatility possible but 2022 showed parliament can resolve</td></tr><tr><td>Red-Team posterior (cluster value is tactical not strategic)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Compelling counter-case but not decisive</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian update magnitudes</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Calibrated on historical analogues, but Swedish politics idiosyncratic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> — LEAD story selection and findings</li>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — 14-day watch window</li>
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) Bayesian prior probabilities with forward signals that update L; (2) ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) assessment; (3) risk interconnection graph showing cascade dependencies; (4) scenario-linked risk weighting per <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Likelihood (L)</strong>: 1 (very unlikely) → 5 (near-certain). Expressed with Bayesian prior P(L≥3).</li>
 <li><strong>Impact (I)</strong>: 1 (minimal) → 5 (transformational). Impact magnitude: electoral seats, legislative outcomes, reputational cost.</li>
@@ -2638,8 +2638,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">R#</th><th>Risk description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Band</th><th align="center">Prior P(L≥3)</th><th>Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R01</strong></td><td>Government passes immigration bills over opposition → polarisation lock-in before 2026 election</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>25</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td>Opposition bloc</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R02</strong></td><td>New Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) faces legal challenge at Admin Court on EU Pact / ECHR grounds</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>Government + MP (litigation-support)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R03</strong></td><td>Opposition fuel-tax stance alienates rural voters — S loses seats in Norrland constituencies</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>S Norrland apparatus</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R04</strong></td><td>Arms-export counter-motions (V+MP) create post-2026 coalition-formation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>V + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R05</strong></td><td>Healthcare reform (SoU) passes with S+V+C opposition → implementation friction</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td>Government + SKR</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R06</strong></td><td>Crime-victim compensation changes (prop. 2025/26:214) create unintended consequences for child welfare</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>Socialstyrelsen</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R07</strong></td><td>C breaks from opposition consensus on deportation → negotiates with government</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td>C leadership</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R08</strong></td><td>Rising unemployment (8.69% 2025) amplifies anti-immigration sentiment → opposition narrative harder</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td>Opposition communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R09</strong></td><td><strong>S revealed-preference silence on deportation</strong> becomes durable intra-opposition fracture</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>S + V + MP coordination</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>V's universal-rejectionist pattern triggers SD attack-ad cycle — V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R11</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses → forces amendment</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td>Lagrådet (external)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R12</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax cut triggers EU DG CLIMA infringement preliminary (Fit-for-55 / ETS II context)</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R13</strong></td><td>ECtHR Strasbourg pilot-judgment on deportation expansion (3–5 year horizon)</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Government legal review</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R14</strong></td><td>Transport union (Transportarbetareförbundet) publicly splits from S on fuel-tax cut → damages S working-class brand</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>S + LO dialogue</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R15</strong></td><td>No 175+ post-2026 majority; minority-government instability; snap election 2027–2028</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>All parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The government's three-proposition immigration package (prop. 2025/26:229, 235, 215) will pass with M/SD/KD/L majority. The opposition's 10 counter-motions, while democratically essential, will all fail. This creates a <strong>polarisation lock-in</strong>: the government campaigns on "we secured the borders" while opposition campaigns on "we defended human rights" — both narratives are true and irreconcilable. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (World Bank data), voter anxiety about resource competition makes the government's framing electorally stronger.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2649,7 +2649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Pol
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Materialisation timeline</strong>: SfU → May 2026; Chamber → June 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition strategic response <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: S's pivot to "integration investment" narrative (HD024079) frames integration as economic productivity, not welfare spending. Combine with comparative-international evidence (private-operator clauses outlier even in Nordic context) to shift frame from "border security" to "welfare-state defence".</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Economic context</strong>: Sweden's unemployment rose from 8.4% (2024) to 8.69% (2025) while GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (after –0.2% in 2023). Economic fragility makes voters more receptive to government arguments about limiting immigration-related public expenditure.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2660,8 +2660,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 —
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Q1 2026 LFS results (expected May 2026) will either strengthen or weaken this risk.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Post-adoption, prop. 2025/26:229's private-operator clauses face challenge at Migrationsdomstolen on EU Pact Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 grounds; ultimate ECtHR referral possible within 36 months.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Full elimination requires either government removing private-operator clauses (no political path) or opposition pre-emptively building litigation record — MP's HD024087 is that record.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: MP's HD024087 text explicitly invokes EU Pact — usable as precedent for NGO amicus briefs.</p>
@@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-La
 <li>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar → L ↑ to 4</li>
 <li>Government amends to remove private-operator clauses → L ↓ to 1</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Specific risk</strong>: The extra budget cuts fuel taxes, directly benefiting rural households with longer commutes. S's HD024082 opposing the cut may be read in rural constituencies as "S doesn't care about our fuel costs." S lost Norrland ground in 2022.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination not feasible (S cannot reverse HD024082 filing); reduction requires rural-counter-offer communications strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Ris
 <li>Rural S MPs issue coordinated statement on HD024082 intent → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Major fuel-price spike (OPEC / geopolitical) during campaign → L ↑ to 5</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategic significance</strong>: C's HD024095 on deportation is distinctively moderate — demands proportionality test (systematic repeated offenses). Positions C as potential negotiating partner with government on immigration. If C negotiates, it breaks the four-party opposition front.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. C's negotiation posture is a feature of its political positioning, not elimination-target for opposition. Mitigation is about <strong>channelling</strong> rather than suppressing C.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a
 <li>Paarup-Petersen rejects amendment talks → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Lagrådet cites proportionality test → L ↑ to 5 (government forced to negotiate)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: S filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235 despite filing on reception (HD024080), housing (HD024079), and fuel tax (HD024082). Signals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party. Reveals that "opposition unity" is selective.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination requires S to file on follow-on deportation legislation in 2026–2027. Monitoring is primary mitigation.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals</strong>:</p>
@@ -2710,11 +2710,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on D
 <li>S leadership public statement on deportation proportionality → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>S silence extends through election campaign → L ↑ to 4</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Lagrådet explicitly critiques private-operator clauses; government forced to amend. High-impact but uncertain-likelihood.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE via opposition monitoring and pre-amplification of Lagrådet language in press.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     R01[R01 Polarisation Lock-In&#x3C;br/>L×I=25]
     R08[R08 Unemployment Context&#x3C;br/>L×I=16]
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a
 <p><strong>Cascade reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: R01 (polarisation lock-in) is the <strong>central node</strong> — 6 other risks feed into it. R08 (unemployment) is the <strong>amplification multiplier</strong>. Opposition mitigation should therefore prioritise R08 (labour-market narrative) and R10 (V rejectionism) as the two highest-leverage input nodes.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-visualisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-visualisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Opposition Motions (April 2026)
     x-axis "Low Likelihood" --> "High Likelihood"
@@ -2786,7 +2786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "R13 ECtHR Pilot": [0.28, 0.90]
     "R15 Minority Gov": [0.18, 0.92]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2884,7 +2884,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk I
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SfU committee scheduling of immigration propositions</td><td>Committee dates announced</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R01, R07, R09</td></tr><tr><td>C leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td>Media appearance</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB)</td><td>Monthly release</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R08</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Sweden deportation case rulings</td><td>Any ruling</td><td>Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>R02, R13</td></tr><tr><td>SVT Novus polls on immigration #1 salience</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>FiU committee vote on extra budget</td><td>Committee vote</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R03, R12, R14</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R11, R02</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Transport union public statement</td><td>Press release</td><td>≤ 21 days</td><td>R14</td></tr><tr><td>Saab/BAE quarterly earnings commentary</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R04</td></tr><tr><td>S follow-on motion on 2026-2027 deportation legislation</td><td>Motion filing</td><td>2026-2027</td><td>R09</td></tr><tr><td>Novus migration-salience tracking</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>R12</td></tr><tr><td>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar on 2025/26:229</td><td>Position paper</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>R02, R11</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current coalition stability <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: STABLE (M/SD/KD/L intact)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All immigration propositions will pass as planned</li>
@@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<
 <li>Campaign-narrative lock-in requires sustained media and polling discipline through summer 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — Bayesian scenario weighting + risk activation per scenario</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team critique adjusts R01 consequence magnitude</li>
@@ -2919,7 +2919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2955,7 +2955,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:04 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>Political SWOT v2.2 + <strong>TOWS interference matrix</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Coverage</strong></td><td>All 8 mandatory groups + 4-cluster drill-down</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition counter-strategy against the government's spring legislative package. Analysis below covers:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level SWOT</strong> for the LEAD immigration cluster (primary focus)</li>
@@ -2964,8 +2964,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framew
 <li>All 8 mandatory stakeholder groups</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S1</strong></td><td>Quadruple-party coordination on New Reception Law signals disciplined opposition front</td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C) — all within 72 h of prop. 2025/26:229</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S2</strong></td><td>S's counter-motion on reception law targets private-sector asylum housing — protects vulnerable people and creates positive electoral narrative</td><td>HD024080: "asylboenden ska inte kunna överlåtas i privat drift" — clear anti-privatization platform</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S3</strong></td><td>C takes moderate position on deportation — requires proportionality (systematic repeated offenses) — converges with European statutory mainstream</td><td>HD024095 — aligned with Germany AufenthG §53, Netherlands "glijdende schaal", Denmark Udlændingeloven §26</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S4</strong></td><td>MP's comprehensive rejection of deportation law challenges constitutional proportionality principle; ECHR Art. 8 alignment</td><td>HD024097 — preserves partial law (8 kap. 1-3 §) while rejecting coercive expansion</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S5</strong></td><td>V's total-rejection strategy provides left-flank anchor for opposition messaging</td><td>HD024090 — outright rejection of entire prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S6</strong></td><td>S's challenge to time-limited immigrant housing frames integration as economic investment, not welfare</td><td>HD024079 — Ardalan Shekarabi requests government return with new housing proposals</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S7</strong></td><td>MP's EU Pact compatibility frame (HD024087) gives cluster international-legitimacy authority</td><td>HD024087 cites EU Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 material-conditions standard</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S8</strong></td><td>Division-of-labour frames cover all major voter segments (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric-axis analysis across HD024076/80/87/89</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>W1</strong></td><td>S's positions on immigration are internally contradictory — party supported stricter policies 2022–2024, now opposes them</td><td>S filed HD024080 but governed with stricter policy 2014-2022</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W2</strong></td><td>Four-party coordination masks substantive incompatibility — V's rejection (HD024090) and C's amendment (HD024095) cannot co-govern</td><td>Motion-text comparison V vs C on same proposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W3</strong></td><td>V and MP arms-export motions put them at odds with post-NATO consensus</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58/32/10 SOM arms-export support (2025)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W4</strong></td><td>MP's across-the-board rejection strategy (4 total rejections) risks being seen as obstructionist</td><td>HD024087, HD024097, HD024096, HD024098 — all outright rejections</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) reveals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for centre-left</td><td>S filed no motion on prop. 2025/26:235; filed on every other cluster</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W6</strong></td><td>No joint press conference or coalition statement; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W7</strong></td><td>V's consistent-rejection pattern across immigration + arms creates "universal rejectionist" frame vulnerability</td><td>HD024076 + HD024090 + HD024091 all rejection-structured</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3186,7 +3186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by Thes
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>O1</strong></td><td>Immigration becomes defining election issue — opposition can build 2026 campaign around "humane alternative"</td><td>10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O2</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) gives S+MP ownership of climate narrative</td><td>Sweden GDP 0.82% 2024, unemployment 8.69% 2025 — economic alternative story</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O3</strong></td><td>Healthcare motions (HD024081/83/94) create unusual S+V+C coalition signalling post-2026 cooperation potential</td><td>Three ideologically diverse parties on healthcare governance</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O4</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen report on Sida enables MP+C to demand accountability on government aid effectiveness</td><td>HD024072/70 — adds "good governance" credibility</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O5</strong></td><td>C's proportionality frame on deportation may attract L backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L rule-of-law sensitivity + comparative statutory-test alignment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O6</strong></td><td>Post-adoption ECtHR litigation on deportation creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Swedish ECHR adverse-judgment track record</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O7</strong></td><td>MP's end-user review language on arms (HD024096) aligns with Norwegian/Dutch/German practice — standard-setting</td><td>Comparative analysis §4</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3258,9 +3258,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td>Government M/SD/KD/L majority will pass all four propositions; opposition risks credibility</td><td>prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236/228 all have coalition support</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td>S's opposition to fuel-tax cut may alienate working-class rural voters who benefit</td><td>HD024082 vs Norrland S vote 2022 baseline</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td>Arms-export opposition (V+MP) conflicts with Swedish post-NATO security doctrine</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58% public support continued exports</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td>Coordinated opposition risks being framed as "obstructionism" on security-critical reforms</td><td>Simultaneous rejection on deportation/reception/housing/arms</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's consistent-rejection pattern as "defends criminals / unreliable on Ukraine"</td><td>V's HD024090 + HD024091 joint attack surface</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td>62% voter support for stricter immigration sets a polling floor opposition cannot breach</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 migration salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td>Extra-budget fast-track procedure on fuel tax compresses opposition narrative-building window to ≤ 4 weeks</td><td>FiU extra-budget timetable</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h3>
 <p>The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves. Below: the <strong>≥3-entry interference cells</strong> with strategic impact on the April 2026 opposition campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opport
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO1</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>Sustain coordinated-opposition narrative through summer</strong> with sequential follow-on motions and media events designed to prevent government from reclaiming the agenda</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO2</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C moderate/statutory) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Target L MPs</strong> (Johan Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) via C's amendment frame; L's historical rule-of-law sensitivity + statutory-test comparative alignment creates narrow negotiation window</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × O2 (climate narrative)</strong></td><td><strong>Link housing-privatisation to fuel-tax private-benefit</strong> as "government prioritises private interests over public goods" unified frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO4</strong></td><td><strong>S7 (MP EU Pact compatibility) × O6 (ECtHR litigation)</strong></td><td><strong>Pre-stage EU Commission remissvar + Strasbourg litigation path</strong>; MP's HD024087 text is usable as precedent for post-adoption legal challenge</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST1</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C proportionality, European mainstream) × T4 (obstructionism frame)</strong></td><td><strong>Publish comparative-international analysis</strong> showing C's amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark — neutralises obstructionism charge</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST2</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × T1 (government majority passes)</strong></td><td><strong>Coordinate SfU vote sequencing</strong> — amendment first, then rejection — to prevent "disarray" framing at chamber vote</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × T2 (rural-voter alienation)</strong></td><td><strong>Front Norrland-anchored S MPs</strong> (Joakim Järrebring, Fredrik Lundh Sammeli) in media appearances on welfare-state framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3346,7 +3346,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weakness
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO1</strong></td><td><strong>W1 (S 2015–2022 legacy) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>S must own the 2015 pivot publicly</strong> — frame HD024080 as "learning from experience" to neutralise legacy-credibility gap</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO2</strong></td><td><strong>W5 (S-silence on deportation) × O3 (S+V+C healthcare coalition)</strong></td><td><strong>S should use healthcare coalition as broader S+V+C rehearsal template</strong>; deportation-silence fragments the left only if not compensated by other coordination evidence</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO3</strong></td><td><strong>W2 (V–C incompatibility) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Stage-manage SfU voting</strong>: C's amendment goes first; if passed, C-V-MP-S-L vote together on amended law; if failed, they unify on rejection. Avoid simultaneous V-reject + C-amend vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3387,25 +3387,25 @@ <h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weak
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>WT1</strong> (V universal rejectionism × SD attack ads) and <strong>WT2</strong> (V–C incompatibility × government majority) are the <strong>two critical vulnerabilities</strong> that could collapse the cluster's campaign value. <strong>WO3</strong> is the essential mitigation: disciplined SfU vote sequencing.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish citizens experience immigration policy directly through social services, housing markets, and labour competition. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (up from 8.4% in 2024), citizens in lower-income brackets are receptive to government arguments about limiting new arrivals. However, <strong>S's HD024080</strong> appeals to citizens concerned about privatisation of asylum services — a proxy for welfare-state protection values that resonate with S's base. The fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) speaks directly to household budgets but risks appearing out-of-touch with rural drivers. A <strong>divided citizenry</strong> is the realistic baseline — the opposition's job is to move ~3-5% swing voters, not to flip majority opinion. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>The governing coalition views these counter-motions as expected partisan opposition. For <strong>Tidö-agreement</strong> parties, the immigration cluster validates their legislative agenda. The sheer number of counter-motions (10/21 on immigration) <strong>confirms the opposition's strategy</strong> and allows the government to campaign on "defending Sweden's security" against a unified left-green-centre bloc. <strong>L is the weak link</strong>: Johan Pehrson's historical rule-of-law sensitivity and the comparative evidence backing C's HD024095 proportionality test create a narrow fault line. The fuel-tax counter-motions create a secondary vulnerability — the government must justify why a climate-ambivalent tax cut is in Sweden's interest. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>This batch represents the most coordinated opposition filing in the current riksmöte. <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> under party leader Magdalena Andersson is pursuing a "responsible opposition" strategy — accepting some security reforms while drawing clear lines on welfare-state privatisation (HD024080) and integration investment (HD024079). The <strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> is strategic, not accidental. <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong> under Nooshi Dadgostar maintains a principled rejection stance on all immigration tightening but risks the universal-rejectionist framing. <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong> under Janine Alm Ericson leads on climate issues (HD024098) and humanitarian concerns. <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> occupies the critical swing position — accepting some deportation reform but demanding proportionality (HD024095); C is the most politically interesting actor in this wave because its amendment posture is the bridge between opposition messaging and European mainstream practice. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish industry faces contradictory pressures. The fuel-tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) benefits transport-dependent industries — making S's HD024082 unpopular with business. However, the time-limited housing law (prop. 2025/26:215) addresses industry's need for a stable, integratable workforce — V's HD024077 argues the housing limitation reduces integration success, which over time damages labour supply. Consumer-credit reform (HD024088, C) affects the financial services sector directly. <strong>Defence industry</strong> (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Karlskoga ~8k jobs) opposes V's HD024091 and will quietly lobby committee MPs. <strong>Transport-sector unions</strong> may publicly split from S on HD024082 — a risk S must pre-empt. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>NGOs, church organisations, and refugee-advocacy groups are the strongest supporters of all opposition immigration motions. <strong>Röda Korset</strong>, <strong>Rädda Barnen</strong>, and <strong>Caritas Sverige</strong> have publicly opposed prop. 2025/26:229. Civil-society concerns centre on: (1) private-sector asylum housing (S's HD024080), (2) proportionality in deportation (C's HD024095 / MP's HD024097), and (3) integration investment (S's HD024079). Crime-victim organisations have mixed views on HD024078/84/85 — parent-liability provisions in the crime-victim law create tension with child-protection principles. <strong>Svenska Freds, Diakonia, Amnesty Sverige</strong> form a durable pro-opposition coalition on arms-export motions. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's immigration policy reforms must remain compatible with the <strong>EU Pact on Migration and Asylum</strong> (entered force 2024, phased implementation 2025–2027). <strong>MP's HD024087</strong> explicitly argues the new reception law risks non-compliance with Reg. 2024/1348 Article 17 material-conditions standard. The arms-export motions (HD024091/96) create international friction — <strong>Sweden's NATO partners</strong> (UK, Germany, US) expect continued defence-industry cooperation post-NATO accession. <strong>EU DG CLIMA</strong> is monitoring Swedish fuel-tax policy under Fit-for-55 and ETS II (entering 2027). <strong>ECtHR</strong> remains a durable post-adoption challenge venue on deportation (prop. 2025/26:235). <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Legal scholars have flagged proportionality concerns in prop. 2025/26:235. <strong>C's HD024095</strong> reflects this — requiring "systematic repeated offenses over time" for deportation aligns with European Court of Human Rights proportionality doctrine and converges with Germany/Netherlands/Denmark/Switzerland statutory practice. <strong>V's total rejection (HD024090)</strong> goes further, arguing the entire law conflicts with ECHR Article 8 (family life). <strong>Lagrådet yttrande</strong> on prop. 2025/26:229 and 2025/26:235 is the single most consequential pending signal — expected Q2 2026. Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) has not published a formal opinion. Administrative Courts (Migrationsdomstolen) will become the main post-adoption venue. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish media (SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD) will cover the coordinated opposition filing as a major political story. Public polling (Novus Q1 2026) shows immigration as the #1 political concern for Swedish voters in 2025–2026. The "four parties against one law" narrative is highly newsworthy. The fuel-tax story plays differently: tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) will frame it as "opposition opposes affordable fuel" — a potential negative story for S. Regional/local media (Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT) will cover the Norrland angle on fuel tax. Young-voter media (TikTok, Instagram) favours MP's climate frame. <strong>Press editorial lines</strong> will be split: DN/SvD lean cautiously pro-government; Aftonbladet/ETC lean pro-opposition; Expressen variable. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Immigration["🏛️ Immigration Policy Cluster (10 motions · LEAD)"]
         P229["prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law"]
@@ -3457,7 +3457,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordinatio
     style P228 fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style P216 fill:#17a2b8,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — LEAD finding + ACH + Red-Team</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — LEAD cluster SWOT</li>
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3510,7 +3510,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:06 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td>🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (democratic process functioning normally; specific strategic threats identified)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frameworks</strong></td><td>Threat taxonomy + <strong>Attack-tree</strong> (opposition) + <strong>Kill-chain</strong> (government counter-strategy) + <strong>Diamond Model</strong> (disinformation) + <strong>STRIDE-adapted</strong> (political-process integrity)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or security threat — it constitutes <strong>healthy democratic opposition exercising accountability functions</strong>. The threat dimensions below are <strong>strategic threats to narrative control</strong> (who wins the 2026 campaign), <strong>governance threats to policy coherence</strong> (climate-fiscal contradiction), and <strong>institutional-integrity threats</strong> (disinformation, coordinated inauthentic behaviour around immigration narratives).</p>
 <p><strong>Six substantive threat lines</strong> merit monitoring, mapped across four complementary frameworks:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -3522,7 +3522,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>T6 NEW: Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour</strong> [MEDIUM] — narrative-integrity threat from domestic-foreign influence actors exploiting immigration salience</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 2026 Threat Analysis] --> B[Democratic Process]
     A --> C[Policy Coherence]
@@ -3556,8 +3556,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="t
     style F1 fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style F2 fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration propositions simultaneously risks <strong>locking in a binary political cleavage</strong> that dominates 2026 election discourse to the exclusion of other policy areas. When all major opposition parties align on a single policy dimension:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Simplifies electoral choice in ways that may not reflect voter complexity</li>
@@ -3566,16 +3566,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: 10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration — no other policy area comes close. The concentration signals that the opposition has calculated immigration is their highest-return electoral investment.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — electoral dynamics are inherently uncertain; the threat materialises only if the opposition successfully executes its framing strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), yet the government's prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes in a supplementary budget — a move that adds <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> (Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling) at a time when Sweden is ~20% behind its 2030 trajectory under Klimatlagen 2017:720. S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) both challenge this with different framings but reach the same conclusion: the fuel-tax cut is bad policy.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this is a governance threat</strong>: If the government passes a climate-inconsistent budget measure while claiming climate leadership, it creates a credibility gap that international partners (EU Commission DG CLIMA, climate-finance investors) may exploit. S's demand that the government "return with a new proposal" is procedurally responsible.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative evidence</strong>: Only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt) is a direct precedent; Germany did not extend. Sweden is betting against European experience.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — the climate-fiscal contradiction is factual and measurable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-export ban including follow-up deliveries) signal that a future left-green government would reverse Sweden's post-NATO defence-industrial policy. This creates <strong>policy uncertainty risk</strong> for defence-industry investment decisions. Swedish arms manufacturers (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Systems Karlskoga ~8k jobs) need long-term policy certainty that their export licences will be maintained.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Both motions challenge prop. 2025/26:228. V's motion explicitly rejects the proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports to human-rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — V and MP are currently in opposition with no pathway to government without S.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Immigration-salience political moments in Sweden 2018, 2022, and now 2026 have correlated with <strong>foreign state-linked amplification networks</strong> (documented by MSB and FOI) and <strong>domestic anonymous influence operations</strong> on social platforms. The April 2026 opposition-motion wave provides a high-value target for:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Foreign influence operations</strong> (Russian-linked and Chinese-linked networks per FOI 2024 assessment) amplifying polarising framings</li>
@@ -3627,7 +3627,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium
 <li>Foreign-language amplification of Swedish political debate (Russian, Arabic, English)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h3>
 <p>Modelled from <strong>government-perspective</strong>: how might the government/SD dismantle the opposition's four-party narrative?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Break 4-party opposition narrative&#x3C;br/>before 2026 election"]
@@ -3688,7 +3688,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">
 <p><strong>Highest-feasibility attack vectors</strong> (dark orange): <strong>A1</strong> (V-C split), <strong>A2</strong> (S-silence exploit), <strong>C1</strong> (V rejectionism attack ads), <strong>D1-D3</strong> (party-specific discrediting). <strong>Opposition mitigation priorities</strong> map directly to SWOT TOWS WT1-WT3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h3>
 <p>Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-communications counter-operation:</p>
 
 
@@ -3737,7 +3737,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kil
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Stage</th><th>Government counter-step</th><th>Opposition counter-counter</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1 Reconnaissance</td><td>SD+M opposition-research team analyses V's HD024076/90/91 for rejectionism patterns</td><td>V pre-audits own filing texts for rejection-framing bias</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2 Weaponisation</td><td>SD ad agency produces attack ads: "V abandons Ukraine" (linking HD024091 to Ukraine-support narrative)</td><td>V issues pre-emptive Ukraine-support statement pairing each arms motion</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3 Delivery</td><td>Ads on YouTube, TikTok, Facebook + front-page placement Expressen</td><td>Opposition paid-media counter on same platforms</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4 Exploitation</td><td>Ads exploit cost-of-living anxiety (74% priority — Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Opposition pivots to integration-as-economic-productivity frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5 Installation</td><td>Frame installed via repeated broadcast → "opposition = chaos"</td><td>Opposition produces positive vision: cross-party amendment on HD024095</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6 Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Tidö-coalition daily message discipline enforcing frame</td><td>Opposition four-leader coordinated op-eds (without joint photo)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7 Actions on Objectives</td><td>Polling moves 1–2 points toward M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Mid-campaign frame-shift to climate or healthcare (where opposition wins)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
 <p>Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:</p>
 
 
@@ -3788,7 +3788,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th>Translation to political context</th><th>Manifestation in April 2026 cluster</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Fake actors impersonating politicians / parties</td><td>Deepfake videos of S / V / MP / C leaders pro/anti positions</td><td>Platform verification; rapid-response units</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Altering policy texts or records</td><td>Fake versions of motion texts circulated on social media</td><td>Riksdagen authoritative-text portal; press fact-checking</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Actors denying statements later</td><td>Party leaders claiming "that's not what our motion says"</td><td>Timestamped primary sources; dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation disclosure</td><td>Private-data leaks around politicians</td><td>Hacked constituency data used to target voters</td><td>Cybersecurity; MFA; GDPR enforcement</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of service</td><td>Suppressing legitimate speech</td><td>Spam flooding of comment sections; fake reports to deplatform opponents</td><td>Platform-policy transparency; legal recourse</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of privilege</td><td>Foreign actors posing as Swedish voters</td><td>Foreign-language amplification networks</td><td>MSB/FOI monitoring; platform CIB removal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-level-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3846,7 +3846,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Level</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Framework</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1 Immigration polarisation</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2026 election</td><td>Taxonomy + kill-chain</td></tr><tr><td>T2 Climate-fiscal contradiction</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Immediate</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T3 Arms-export policy uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Post-2026</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T4 Deportation proportionality</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>ECHR review</td></tr><tr><td>T5 Democratic-deficit perception</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T6 Disinformation / CIB</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Immediate–September</td><td>Diamond + STRIDE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: 🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Healthy democratic process with identifiable strategic threats, primarily in the <strong>narrative-capture</strong> and <strong>information-integrity</strong> domains rather than <strong>constitutional / rule-of-law</strong> domains.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3908,7 +3908,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Action</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th>Addressed-to</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Pre-stage V Ukraine-support statement template paired with arms-export motions</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Coordinate SfU amendment-first vote sequencing (mitigates A1 attack)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S+V+MP+C whips</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Issue comparative-international evidence briefing to newsrooms (mitigates C2 obstructionism frame)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Opposition press shops</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Monitor MSB/FOI CIB reports; rapid-response to amplification spikes</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All opposition parties</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Prepare rural S MP media schedule (mitigates D1 + R03)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S Norrland delegation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Pre-audit motion texts for deepfake/rumour pre-emption (STRIDE S/T)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>All four opposition press offices</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Document Lagrådet yttrande preparation; pre-brief journalists</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition legal advisors</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>Establish 24h joint-response rotation for attack-ad counters</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition communications coalition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team + ACH ties directly to T1</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — R10 (V rejectionist) ↔ T1/A1/C1</li>
@@ -3921,7 +3921,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-arms-export-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3969,7 +3969,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>ARMS-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024091 (V), HD024096 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:228 — <em>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>Both 2026-04-16 (same-day dual filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>7.5/10 (minority-bloc opposition on post-NATO defence policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>7.50</strong> (×1.00 — foreign-policy dimension neutral weighting)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral foreign policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🔶 <strong>TERTIARY</strong> story with long-horizon significance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024, ending 200+ years of formal military non-alignment (<em>alliansfriheten</em>). Prop. 2025/26:228 modernises the arms-export legal framework (<em>lag om krigsmateriel</em> + <em>lag om vissa produkter som kan användas för dödsstraff eller tortyr</em>) to align Swedish defence-industrial practice with its new alliance obligations and the post-Ukraine-invasion European armaments market reality.</p>
 <p>The V (HD024091) and MP (HD024096) counter-motions are important <strong>not because they will alter the outcome</strong> — the M/SD/KD/L coalition has a secure majority on foreign-policy questions, and the opposition is split with S absent — but because they are <strong>post-NATO reference points</strong>. They establish, publicly and on the parliamentary record, what a future V/MP/(potential S)-led government would do differently.</p>
 <p>This matters for three audiences:</p>
@@ -3982,7 +3982,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The cluster is a <strong>low-probability, high-consequence signalling event</strong>. With no S and only V+MP filing, it lacks electoral consequence in 2026. But it sets the <strong>baseline parameters of the post-2026 defence-policy debate</strong>. If any government-formation scenario includes V or MP (even as a confidence-and-supply partner), the positions in HD024091 and HD024096 become immediate negotiation constraints.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4012,7 +4012,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Position</th><th>Electoral message</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024091</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Håkan Svenneling</td><td><strong>Complete rejection</strong> of the proposition; preserve pre-existing restrictive regime</td><td>"We do not profit from other people's wars"</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Jacob Risberg</td><td><strong>Conditional acceptance</strong> — ban exports to human-rights-violator states; require follow-up-delivery review</td><td>"Defence yes; profit from oppression no"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Divergence analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: V and MP have historically both opposed arms-export liberalisation but with different intensities. This filing confirms a <strong>persistent 2022 → 2026 ideological gap</strong> between them on defence: V is pacifist-adjacent; MP is "ethical defence" — accepting defence industry but with strict end-user controls. Post-NATO, MP's position is more politically viable; V's position is more electorally costly in the current security environment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4059,7 +4059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession
 <p><strong>Insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Post-NATO context makes this <strong>the weakest cluster</strong> in the April 2026 opposition-motions wave. V and MP are filing for <strong>ideological consistency</strong> rather than electoral leverage. Analysts should weight the motions as <strong>signalling, not policy-influencing</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4137,7 +4137,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Ideological consistency: V and MP have opposed arms-export liberalisation since the 1990s; credible filing</td><td>V 1994–2026 positions; MP 1991–2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's conditional frame (HD024096) is aligned with EU Common Position 2008/944/CFSP criteria 2 (human rights)</td><td>EU Common Position text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — Human-rights NGO support (Amnesty, Svenska Freds, Diakonia) is durable and organised</td><td>NGO historical pattern</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is absent — cannot form majority government opposition with only V+MP</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:228</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024091) is inconsistent with Sweden's Ukraine-support consensus (cross-party ~95%)</td><td>Ukraine lethal aid packages 2022-2025, all-party vote</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — Defence-industrial geographic concentration (Linköping/Saab, Karlskoga/BAE) means local S MPs face job-protection pressure</td><td>Constituency employment data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — Issue has fallen off top-10 voter priorities post-Ukraine invasion</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 issue salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Any future human-rights scandal involving Swedish platform in a recipient country (e.g., Saudi export controversy template) would vindicate MP's frame</td><td>Historical Saudi Arabia controversy</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — MP's end-user review demand could become standard-setting for European export-control modernisation</td><td>EU Common Position review cycle</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Defence-industry excess profits (Saab 22% margin 2024) could fuel populist "war profiteers" frame</td><td>Saab Q4 2024 earnings</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government narrative: "V+MP are unreliable NATO partners" for post-2026 negotiations</td><td>SD and M messaging template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Ukraine allied-support frame ("we help Ukraine by maintaining exports") is electorally dominant</td><td>Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Defence-industry layoff threats (implicit or explicit) during amendment negotiation</td><td>Saab/BAE historical lobbying</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4172,7 +4172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — Th
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cluster's weakness is overwhelming — the <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference (S-absence + NATO-unreliability frame) defines the cluster as a non-decisive signalling event. The interpretive frontier is whether MP's end-user review language (HD024096) gets absorbed into the final UU committee report as a dissenting minority position — that would be the cluster's <strong>only</strong> concrete policy achievement.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6.
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: MP's HD024096 "end-user review" demand is <strong>not an ideological outlier</strong> — it would move Sweden closer to Norway, Netherlands, and post-2024 Germany. Analysts should not report this as a fringe position; it is a mainstream Northern European stance.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4308,7 +4308,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AR1</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 passes without MP's end-user review language incorporated</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>UU minority reservation formalises V/MP position</td><td>UU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>AR2</td><td>Swedish arms used in future recipient-country human-rights incident; vindication for MP frame but reputational damage for Sweden</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Pre-emptive stricter end-user review</td><td>3–7 year horizon</td></tr><tr><td>AR3</td><td>V's total-rejection stance cited by SD as proof V "would abandon Ukraine"</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>V clarifies explicit Ukraine-support carveout</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>AR4</td><td>Defence-industry concentrated-layoff threats influence UU committee negotiations</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td>UU rapporteur independence; media transparency</td><td>UU negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>AR5</td><td>EU Common Position review (2027) adopts language closer to MP's position; Sweden needs to amend retroactively</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP's parliamentary record is usable precedent</td><td>2027+</td></tr><tr><td>AR6</td><td>Post-2026 coalition scenario requires V or MP support; HD024091/96 become negotiation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>Map of alternative coalition configurations</td><td>Post-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4352,7 +4352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>UU rapporteur selection and draft report</strong></td><td>Any inclusion of end-user review language</td><td>May 2026</td><td>AR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab / BAE quarterly earnings</strong></td><td>Public commentary on political risk</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>AR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Svenska Freds annual export analysis</strong></td><td>Data-driven NGO critique</td><td>Annual</td><td>AR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Common Position review</strong></td><td>Brussels-level policy changes</td><td>2027</td><td>AR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Post-election government-formation negotiations</strong></td><td>V/MP coalition conditions if applicable</td><td>Sep–Nov 2026</td><td>AR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         V["V · Håkan Svenneling&#x3C;br/>HD024091&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -4408,7 +4408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
     style Ukraine fill:#ffd700,color:#000
     style NATO_SEC fill:#003399,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 will pass with both motions defeated</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Coalition majority in UU; S non-filing removes only credible threat</td></tr><tr><td>MP's end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Comparative table §6</td></tr><tr><td>V's total rejection vs Ukraine-support coherence gap damages V's electoral standing by 0.5-1%</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Novus polling + Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td></tr><tr><td>Defence industry will publicly intervene in committee process</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Sweden's industry lobbying is usually quiet</td></tr><tr><td>Post-2026 V/MP coalition role includes defence-export renegotiation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Depends on election outcome (P ≈ 0.35 for any V/MP influence)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 5 (defence-policy signalling)</li>
 <li><strong>Threat analysis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>../threat-analysis.md</code></a> T3 (arms export opposition)</li>
@@ -4463,7 +4463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deportation-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>DEPORT-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:235 — <em>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>All 2026-04-16 (same-day triple filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>9/10 (triple-party opposition, constitutional proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.80</strong> (9.0 ×0.98 — electoral-definitional axis per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (P1 policy with ECHR/proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead framing</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h3>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:235 expands the grounds on which non-citizens can be deported following a criminal conviction. It lowers the severity threshold, extends to categories of offence previously requiring repeat conviction, and shortens the procedural window for appeal. The government presents it as a <strong>flagship gäng-kriminalitet response</strong> — a direct continuation of the 2023–2025 organised-crime legislative arc.</p>
 <p>What makes this cluster analytically distinct from the reception-law cluster is that <strong>the three filed counter-motions occupy visibly different positions on the same proportionality axis</strong>, rather than agreeing on one frame. This is not a coordination failure — it is a <strong>deliberate triangulation</strong>, and it demonstrates more sophisticated parliamentary technique than the unified reception-law front:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -4528,7 +4528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This C
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Where the reception-law cluster is a <em>political</em> coordination achievement, the deportation cluster is a <em>legal-rhetorical</em> coordination achievement. The three frames map onto three possible judicial outcomes. This gives opposition parties a durable talking-points inventory for the full litigation lifecycle, not just the 2026 campaign cycle.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4569,7 +4569,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Th
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Legal position</th><th align="center">ECHR alignment</th><th>Post-adoption litigation value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024090</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>Total rejection; law violates equal-protection principle</td><td align="center">Indirect (Art. 14)</td><td>Low — courts cannot strike down statute</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024095</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>Conditional — require "systematic repeated offences over time"</td><td align="center">Direct (Art. 8 proportionality)</td><td><strong>High</strong> — provides appeal template</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024097</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>Partial rejection — preserve 8 kap. 1–3 §; reject coercive expansion</td><td align="center">Indirect (procedural due process)</td><td>Medium — targets specific provisions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Triangulation analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The three motions can be read as a Russian-doll hierarchy of demands. If the government refuses all three, V's position is vindicated as "you see, nothing satisfies them"; if the government accepts C's proportionality test, MP's preservation is automatically satisfied; V loses electorally but gains legally. This structure means the opposition <strong>cannot lose everything</strong> from the filing — at minimum, it has established an evidentiary record for post-adoption challenges.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4647,7 +4647,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aw
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Triangulated frames survive hostile selective reporting; each paper can find a frame that suits its editorial line</td><td>HD024090 (DN), HD024095 (Expressen), HD024097 (Svenska Dagbladet)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — C's HD024095 aligns with Lagrådet's historical proportionality concerns on similar statutes</td><td>C's motion cites 8 kap. 1 § wording with proportionality test</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — MP's preservation logic (HD024097) is the most legally conservative — difficult to attack as obstructionist</td><td>MP explicitly preserves 8 kap. 1-3 §</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024090) anchors the cluster against any government "we met them halfway" framing</td><td>V's rejection text cites ECHR Art. 14 indirectly</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is notably absent from this cluster (filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235)</td><td>Compare: S filed on reception, housing, fuel tax, healthcare — not deportation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on deportation of convicted foreigners runs 70%+ in favour (SOM-institutet 2025)</td><td>SOM-institutet 2025 data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — SD campaign will cherry-pick V's HD024090 "Sweden should not deport criminals" framing</td><td>SD 2022 campaign template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Post-adoption ECHR litigation in Strasbourg creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Pending Sweden ECHR cases backlog</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — C's proportionality frame may attract Liberal (L) backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L historical position on rule-of-law issues</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Lagrådet yttrande may cite C's HD024095 language; elevates it from partisan motion to quasi-consensus</td><td>Lagrådet historically cites committee opposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — S's silence will be framed by opposition-internal critics as "S is too close to government on deportation" — fractures left</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Government argument that deportation is gäng-criminalitet response is electorally dominant (58% support, Novus)</td><td>Novus 2026-Q1 crime salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Administrative Court backlogs mean post-adoption challenges resolve only in 2027–2028</td><td>Sweden admin-court stats</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4682,7 +4682,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference —
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The "S silence" is the <strong>single most revealing signal</strong> in the motions cluster. S has prioritised welfare-state defence over legal-proportionality defence. This is a <strong>strategic choice</strong> that reveals S's 2026 campaign architecture: S intends to own the <em>economic</em> immigration narrative (integration, housing, anti-privatisation) while avoiding the <em>security</em> immigration narrative (deportation, border enforcement). Opposition-bloc analysts should note that this means S is not a reliable partner for ECHR-based challenges post-adoption.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article 8 (family life) because deportation for criminal conduct has been repeatedly upheld by the European Court of Human Rights when:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>The conduct is of sufficient gravity</li>
@@ -4740,7 +4740,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Nordic and continental trend is <strong>towards</strong> statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 is therefore <strong>not a leftist/liberal outlier</strong> — it is a convergence move toward European best practice. Framing it as such in newsroom coverage would materially change the political economy of the motion.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4811,7 +4811,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DR1</td><td>Government rejects all three motions; law passes with expanded triggers; Sweden faces ECHR Strasbourg case within 36 months</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Litigation-ready record already in HD024097</td><td>Post-adoption Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR2</td><td>S-free zone in this cluster becomes durable opposition fracture — V+MP+C cannot form majority without S</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>Requires S to file a motion on subsequent deportation legislation</td><td>2027 follow-on propositions</td></tr><tr><td>DR3</td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's HD024090 "do not deport criminals" soundbite; V drops 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with crime-victim framing</td><td>Pre-election ad cycle Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR4</td><td>C's HD024095 is co-opted by government to add "systematic" qualifier; proportionality test dilutes in drafting</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C leadership must refuse dilutions; protect statutory test</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>DR5</td><td>Lagrådet explicitly cites C's proportionality frame in its yttrande; government is forced to amend</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr><tr><td>DR6</td><td>ECHR issues pilot-judgment against Sweden for disproportionate deportation practice</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td>None (structural); but massive reputational impact</td><td>3–5 year horizon</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</strong></td><td>Any reference to "proportionalitet" or "systematiska upprepade"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>DR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S follow-on motion</strong></td><td>S files motion on follow-on deportation legislation</td><td>2026–2027</td><td>DR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C leader interview on HD024095</strong></td><td>C party leader / Paarup-Petersen media appearance</td><td>Weekly from April 2026</td><td>DR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD ad campaign</strong></td><td>Content analysis of SD social ads for "V defends criminals" framing</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>DR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Administrative Court case filings</strong></td><td>Volume of deportation-order challenges post-adoption</td><td>Monthly 2027+</td><td>DR1, DR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph A["🏛️ Committee-Level Actors"]
         SfU["SfU rapporteur&#x3C;br/>(M/SD/KD)"]
@@ -4910,7 +4910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Mo
     style LAG fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style ECHR fill:#8e44ad,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4948,7 +4948,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertaint
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Uncertainty</th><th align="right">Current prior</th><th>What would update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Will Lagrådet cite C's proportionality language?</td><td align="right">P = 0.40</td><td>Lagrådet historical pattern on committee motions</td></tr><tr><td>Will an L backbencher defect on HD024095?</td><td align="right">P = 0.15</td><td>Any public L statement on deportation</td></tr><tr><td>Will S file a deportation motion in 2026–2027 follow-on legislation?</td><td align="right">P = 0.55</td><td>S 2026 election platform language on crime</td></tr><tr><td>Will ECHR issue pilot judgment vs Sweden within 5 years?</td><td align="right">P = 0.25</td><td>Admin Court case volume after adoption</td></tr><tr><td>Will C's HD024095 survive SfU negotiation intact?</td><td align="right">P = 0.30</td><td>Rapporteur selection and amendment process</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 2 (triple-pressure immigration)</li>
 <li><strong>Related reception cluster</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>./reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
@@ -4967,7 +4967,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5015,7 +5015,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>FUEL-CLUSTER-2026-04-15-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024098 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:236 — <em>Extra ändringsbudget: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Finansutskottet (FiU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-15 (S) · 2026-04-17 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>8.3/10 (climate-fiscal contradiction)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.20</strong> (8.3 ×0.99 — fiscal/climate axis retains near-full weight; per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥉 <strong>SECONDARY</strong> story with electoral-narrative importance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h3>
 <p>The extra budget (<em>extra ändringsbudget</em>) is a mid-cycle supplementary fiscal instrument. Reducing fuel tax via an extra budget is unusual: extra budgets are traditionally reserved for crisis response (pandemic, war, natural disaster). Using one to cut fuel tax signals that the government either (a) believes current fuel prices are a <strong>genuine household-budget crisis</strong> or (b) is delivering an <strong>election-adjacent pocketbook signal</strong> to rural voters within the legal envelope of extra-budget practice.</p>
 <p>The analytic pivot is this: <strong>the fuel tax cut is the only government-policy item in the April 2026 opposition-motion cluster that the opposition can frame as unambiguously contradicting stated government commitments</strong> — in this case, Sweden's Paris Agreement trajectory and the government's own climate mandate under the 2017 Climate Act.</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5027,7 +5027,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cluster is a <em>second electoral pillar</em> for the opposition, independent of the immigration narrative. Opposition strategists will treat this as the <strong>"climate pillar"</strong> to complement the <strong>"humanitarian pillar"</strong> of the immigration clusters. The cluster's value is therefore not in defeating prop. 2025/26:236 (it will pass) but in <strong>building a durable campaign narrative for September 2026</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5060,7 +5060,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Primary frame</th><th>Secondary frame</th><th>Target voter segment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024082</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Mikael Damberg</td><td>Fiscal responsibility — "ineffective spending; return with better proposal"</td><td>Distributional — "tax cut disproportionately benefits higher incomes with larger vehicles"</td><td>Centre-left; suburban S voters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024098</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Janine Alm Ericson</td><td>Climate coherence — "increases emissions; violates Paris and Climate Act trajectory"</td><td>Intergenerational — "shifts costs to future taxpayers via climate penalty"</td><td>Urban-green MP voters; young voters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Data note <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: An earlier draft of this dossier's <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> listed HD024092 as a third fuel-tax counter-motion. That reference was reconciled against the canonical filing index in <code>classification-results.md</code> and <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> (both of which list only HD024082 and HD024098), and removed. The cluster is definitively two-party (S + MP); arguments in this analysis that depend on cluster size are written to the two-party baseline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5138,7 +5138,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Two complementary frames (fiscal + climate) cover centre-left and green voter bases without competition</td><td>HD024082 (fiscal), HD024098 (climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's climate frame is measurable: the cut adds ≈ 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e annually (Naturvårdsverket modelling)</td><td>Naturvårdsverket fuel-tax elasticity models</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — S's procedural "return with better proposal" framing is defensive — hard to attack as obstructionist</td><td>HD024082 motion text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — Rural voters gain directly from the cut; S's HD024082 risks Norrland vote erosion</td><td>S rural-constituency 2022 results</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on fuel taxes is decisively negative (63% support any cut, Novus 2026-Q1)</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — The cut is time-limited (extra budget framing) — reduces long-term climate-accountability leverage</td><td>Extra-budget procedural design</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's climate frame has limited resonance with voters prioritising cost-of-living (74% in Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus priority-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Climate frame aligns with EU Fit-for-55 and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) obligations; international-legitimacy authority for the opposition position</td><td>EU Climate Package</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Young voters (18–29) prioritise climate over fuel cost 52/48 (Ungdomsbarometern 2025); MP's frame captures this cohort</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern 2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Naturskyddsföreningen / WWF / Fridays for Future coalition can amplify MP's frame via civil-society pressure</td><td>Environmental NGO activation patterns</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government can frame S+MP as "elitist" on cost-of-living — inverts S's traditional working-class brand</td><td>SD and M rural-voter messaging</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Extra-budget vote is fast-tracked; opposition has ≤ 4 weeks to build narrative before vote</td><td>FiU fast-track procedure</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Transport-sector unions (Transportarbetareförbundet) may publicly split from S on this issue</td><td>Trade-union historical position</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Climate Act (<em>Klimatlagen 2017:720</em>) obligates the government to pursue policies consistent with the long-term goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 and interim targets:</p>
 
 
@@ -5167,7 +5167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Cont
 <p><strong>Analytic claim <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cut moves Sweden <strong>further away</strong> from its 2030 Climate Act target, at a moment when the government is already ~20% behind that target. MP's HD024098 can cite this as a measurable, reviewable, court-testable obligation breach. In principle, under §5 of Klimatlagen, the government must explain to parliament if a policy measure is incompatible with the climate targets.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5202,7 +5202,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference is the crucial variable. If S does not front Norrland-anchored S MPs in the news cycle, SD will convert this into a "urban elite vs rural family" frame that costs S more electorally than MP's climate frame gains. Historical precedent: 2018 carbon-tax debate (France → Gilets Jaunes) — the lesson is that without a rural counter-offer, climate fiscal policy generates majority backlash.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5261,7 +5261,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of the seven jurisdictions analysed, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt is a direct precedent</strong> for Sweden's proposed cut, and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> because the electoral benefit did not materialise. The proposition is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong> — a point the opposition can cite in newsroom debate.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5323,7 +5323,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FR1</td><td>Fuel tax cut passes; S loses 1–2% Norrland vote before 2026</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Deploy rural S MPs in media; counter-propose transit/EV subsidy</td><td>FiU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR2</td><td>EU Commission initiates infringement proceedings against Sweden for Climate Act / Fit-for-55 backsliding</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>MP escalates via EU remissvar; green-MEP amplification</td><td>Post-adoption Q3-Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR3</td><td>Government narrative ("S and MP out of touch with rural Sweden") dominates 2-week news cycle</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Front rural MPs; counter-propose; attack distributional impact</td><td>Immediate post-filing</td></tr><tr><td>FR4</td><td>Transport unions break publicly from S, endorse government's cut</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>S-union dialogue pre-empting public statement</td><td>Within 14 days</td></tr><tr><td>FR5</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet issues critical report citing the cut</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP in remissvar amplifies Council findings</td><td>Annual report Q1 2027</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5373,7 +5373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which Fi committee MP gets the rapporteur</td><td>≤ 14 days</td><td>FR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norrland local-media coverage</strong></td><td>Content analysis of Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT</td><td>Weekly</td><td>FR1, FR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Transport union statement</strong></td><td>Public position from Transportarbetareförbundet</td><td>Within 21 days</td><td>FR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket Q2 2026 climate report</strong></td><td>Quantified emissions impact estimate</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>FR2, FR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU DG CLIMA monitoring letter</strong></td><td>Any DG CLIMA comment on Swedish policy backsliding</td><td>Q3-Q4 2026</td><td>FR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</strong></td><td>Annual Swedish climate council assessment</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>FR5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         S["S · Mikael Damberg&#x3C;br/>HD024082&#x3C;br/>FISCAL"]
@@ -5429,7 +5429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Clus
     style EU_DG_CLIMA fill:#003399,color:#fff
     style KlimatR fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut adds 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling</td></tr><tr><td>Government will pass the cut</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; Finance Ministry ownership</td></tr><tr><td>S loses ≥1% Norrland vote if rural counter-frame not deployed</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2022 baseline + historical rural-fuel elasticity</td></tr><tr><td>MP's climate frame resonates with 18-29 voters > cost-of-living frame</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern but priority framing effects</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission initiates infringement within 18 months</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>DG CLIMA politically cautious; Sweden in "monitoring" not "procedure" zone</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 3</li>
 <li><strong>Risk assessment</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>../risk-assessment.md</code></a> R03</li>
@@ -5484,7 +5484,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5536,7 +5536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>RCPT-CLUSTER-2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:229 — <em>En ny mottagandelag</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-13 (V) · 2026-04-15 (S, MP, C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>10/10 (unprecedented 4-party coordination)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9.40</strong> (×0.94 — electoral/policy axis, not constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 6 — multi-party coordination on P1 policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead selection</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has not seen <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions against a single government proposition in a 72-hour window at any point in the current riksmöte. The last comparable four-party convergence on an immigration bill was the 2022 "Migration Package" debates — and even then, motions were staggered across a week and coordinated informally. The April 2026 reception-law cluster is <strong>tighter, more public, and more electorally framed</strong> than that precedent.</p>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) is the Tidö government's flagship asylum-reception reform. It replaces the 1994 reception act (<em>Lagen om mottagande av asylsökande m.fl.</em>) with a new architecture that:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5551,7 +5551,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: This is primarily a <em>campaign-narrative construction</em> cluster. The parties are building a broad, electorally legible anti-Tidö story on the dominant 2026 migration issue while preserving differentiated messages for their own voter coalitions (V's total rejection vs. C's proportionality test). A secondary hypothesis is that the cluster also functions as a limited <em>coalition-rehearsal</em> exercise: if the common line holds through chamber vote (expected June 2026), it modestly strengthens the case that a shared opposition front can be sustained after the election. Readers should treat coalition-rehearsal as contingent inference, not as the dominant operational logic.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Committee</th><th>Rhetorical frame</th><th>Core demand</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024076</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Rights-based rejection</em> — "asylum is a right, not a privilege to be earned"</td><td>Total rejection of the law; preserve pre-existing reception act</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024080</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Ida Karkiainen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Welfare-state protection</em> — "asylum housing must not be privatised"</td><td>Remove private-operator provisions; return to parliament with a revised proposal that excludes private asylum housing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024087</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>EU-compliance and humanitarian</em> — "Sweden cannot undercut the EU Pact's minimum standards"</td><td>Reject the law; invoke EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) integration minimums</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024089</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Administrative workability</em> — "reform is too fast, will break municipal capacity"</td><td>Amend the law; phase implementation; restore municipal discretion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Division-of-labour analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Four motions, four distinct frames, one shared target. V takes the principled-left flank; S anchors the welfare-state case; MP internationalises via EU law; C occupies the pragmatist centre. A Tidö-aligned media response that attacks one frame (e.g., "V is soft on criminals") fails against the other three. This is <strong>defence-in-depth messaging</strong> — a hallmark of a coordinated opposition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5683,7 +5683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Unprecedented coordination demonstrates opposition discipline</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89 all filed within 72 hours on same prop.</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — Four distinct frames cover entire voter-coalition surface (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric axis above</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — C's moderate frame (HD024089) insulates cluster from "obstructionism" attack</td><td>C demands amendment, not rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — Publicly visible filing cadence creates sustained news cycle</td><td>4 separate newsroom events over 2 days</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024076) and C's amendment (HD024089) cannot co-govern — coalition is rhetorical, not programmatic</td><td>Compare HD024076 (reject) vs HD024089 (amend) texts</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — S filed HD024080 despite having governed 2014–2022 with successively stricter reception policy — legacy-credibility gap</td><td>S migration-policy shift 2015 (Löfven) → 2022</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — No cluster-wide joint statement or press conference released; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's "EU compliance" frame has limited domestic traction (≤15% of voters cite EU law salience; Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus survey 2026-Q1</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Immigration cluster displaces government agenda for 2–3 news cycles, denying M/SD coverage of other wins</td><td>Expected media cycle post-filing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Post-2026 S+V+MP+C majority scenario (P≈0.15, see scenario-analysis.md) would allow reception-law repeal</td><td>Election prior analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — C's amendment frame creates narrow negotiation channel with L (coalition centrist) — may split Tidö</td><td>L's historical press-freedom / integration posture</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — 62% voter support for stricter immigration (Novus 2026-Q1) means government owns the dominant narrative</td><td>Novus migration-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — SD framing "opposition defends the unvetted" in attack ads will resonate with 2022 SD voters (20% of electorate)</td><td>SD 2022 election data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Legal-aid and housing NGOs may publicly split if S's private-operator carve-out passes into the amended law</td><td>Anticipated Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5718,7 +5718,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The interference <strong>W1 × T1</strong> — the rhetorical incompatibility between V's rejection and C's amendment under a dominant government narrative — is the <strong>single most consequential variable</strong> for whether this cluster converts into durable 2026 electoral advantage. If the four parties can stage-manage the SfU vote sequence (amendment → rejection), the cluster holds. If they cannot, the government's "disarray" frame wins.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but the <strong>combination</strong> of private-sector operation + time-limited benefits + activation duties is on the restrictive end of EU practice.</p>
 
 
@@ -5779,7 +5779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative Interna
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The private-operation provision is the <strong>distinctive outlier</strong>. Only Germany (via Länder-level discretion) offers a close parallel, and Germany's CDU/CSU–SPD governance has maintained active oversight of private operators. The opposition's privatisation-focus in HD024080 is therefore <strong>well-aligned with comparative best practice</strong> — it attacks the provision that deviates most from Nordic peers. See <code>comparative-international.md</code> §1 for full analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5841,7 +5841,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L (1-5)</th><th align="center">I (1-5)</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RR1</td><td>Law passes with private-operator provision intact; S's HD024080 frame fails electorally</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>20</strong></td><td>S must convert housing-privatisation into "welfare-privatisation" umbrella frame</td><td>SfU vote, expected May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR2</td><td>Law challenged at Administrative Court on EU Pact compatibility grounds; ECJ referral possible</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Government legal review shows Pact alignment; MP's HD024087 frame anchors challenge</td><td>Post-adoption legal challenge Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR3</td><td>V's total rejection (HD024076) is singled out in SD attack ads as "pro-illegal-immigration" stance; V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with border-capacity-building alternatives</td><td>SD campaign Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR4</td><td>C's amendment frame (HD024089) is co-opted by government to add minor changes and claim consensus</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C's leadership must refuse any amendment that preserves private-operator core</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>RR5</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 identifies ECHR Art. 8 concerns (family unity); opposition gains legal authority for its position</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet published opinions</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5891,7 +5891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal to watch</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates which risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SfU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which M/SD/KD MP gets the rapporteur role</td><td>Within 14 days</td><td>RR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</strong></td><td>Public release; look for references to "privat aktör" and "rättssäkerhet"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>RR2, RR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Joint opposition press statement</strong></td><td>Four-leader joint presser — holds vs fails coordination</td><td>May 2026</td><td>W1 mitigation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Novus migration salience</strong></td><td>Monthly tracking; focus on "is private asylum housing acceptable?" split</td><td>Monthly 2026</td><td>RR1, RR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L internal debate</strong></td><td>Any L MP (especially Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) breaking on amendments</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>O3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</strong></td><td>Published NGO positions on private-operator carve-out</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>Threat 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Filers["🗳️ Filing Parties (coordination front)"]
         V["V · HD024076&#x3C;br/>Tony Haddou&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -5949,7 +5949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Receptio
     style KD fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style L fill:#fd7e14,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5992,7 +5992,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Four-party coordination is unprecedented in 2025/26 riksmöte</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Filing-date analysis from riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code></td></tr><tr><td>Cluster is lead story of the news-motions run for 2026-04-20</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>DIW weighting + media-attention scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Law will pass despite cluster (prior P ≈ 0.85)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; no defection signal</td></tr><tr><td>C's amendment frame will convert 1–2 L MPs to support</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>L internal divisions historically exist but rarely break Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster will shift Novus migration-issue salience by 2–4 points over 2 weeks</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historical post-filing polling shifts on high-salience issues</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP+C can form post-2026 majority government</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Current polling: S+V+MP+C ≈ 42–45%; would require gains</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 1</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference map</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §Cross-Party Alignment</li>
@@ -6009,7 +6009,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6045,7 +6045,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:55 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Translate the April 2026 opposition coordination into 349-seat arithmetic — which governing combinations become more or less viable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Novus April 2026 trend, SCB-SOM Autumn 2025, Val.se 2022 result, Riksdagen seat distribution</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH on current chamber maths · 🟧 MEDIUM on post-election projections (election 5 months away)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT, scenario, and risk artifacts answer <em>what</em> and <em>why</em>. They do not answer the operational question every editor, civil servant, and foreign desk needs: <strong>which governments are and are not possible after September 2026, and how does the April wave change those numbers?</strong></p>
 <p>This artifact provides:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -6056,7 +6056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic I
 <li>Explicit propagation of the April-wave polling delta (from <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3).</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6113,8 +6113,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">2022 seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong> — Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong> — Sverigedemokraterna</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Government support (Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M</strong> — Moderaterna</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> — Vänsterpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong> — Centerpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong> — Kristdemokraterna</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> — Miljöpartiet</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong> — Liberalerna</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h3>
-<h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h4>
+<h4 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6145,7 +6145,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Key structural fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Tidö majority is <strong>+1 seat</strong> — the narrowest plausible governing majority. A single by-election loss, party-switch, or suspension collapses it. The opposition is <strong>2 seats short</strong> — within polling sampling error. April 2026 is therefore happening in a <strong>genuinely contested</strong> chamber, not a safe-government context.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wave polling effect):</p>
 
 
@@ -6210,7 +6210,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projectio
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>4-percent threshold warning <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: L at 4.3 % is <strong>within the ±1.5 pp Novus sampling band</strong> of the 4.0 % Riksdag threshold. A single bad polling month pushes L below; if L misses the threshold its seats redistribute (≈ 15 of the 16 flow to M/KD/SD under Sainte-Laguë). This is the <strong>single largest single-party uncertainty</strong> in the 2026 election.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6241,7 +6241,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hi
 <p><strong>Inversion finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 pre-wave polling already projects a <strong>~23-seat opposition majority</strong> — a 26-seat swing from the 2022 +1 Tidö majority. If these polling numbers survive to election day, the Tidö bloc <strong>cannot form a government</strong> without a realignment involving C.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h3>
 <p>From <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-year waves is a <strong>−1.3 pp median shift against the government</strong> in the three weeks following a ≥ 10-motion coordinated opposition wave. Applying that prior to the April 2026 polling baseline:</p>
 
 
@@ -6295,8 +6295,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta —
 <p><strong>Decision-useful takeaway <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Across <em>every</em> plausible polling-delta scenario derived from the historical base rate, <strong>the opposition projected seat total remains ≥ 200</strong> and the Tidö total <strong>remains ≤ 160</strong>. The April wave does not create an opposition majority; <strong>it widens an opposition majority that already existed in pre-wave polling</strong>. The correct framing is "opposition widens lead" not "opposition gains lead".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ = mathematically possible (≥ 175 seats) AND politically plausible (no ruled-out blocks)</li>
 <li>🟧 = mathematically possible but requires political compromises with declared ruled-out actors</li>
@@ -6364,12 +6364,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Coalition</th><th align="center">Seats (median delta)</th><th align="center">Viability</th><th>Political barriers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>S + V + MP</strong> (red-green classic)</td><td align="center">119 + 34 + 19 = <strong>172</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (3 short)</td><td>None intrinsic; needs C tolerance</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>S + V + MP + C</strong> (4-party opposition bloc)</td><td align="center">172 + 26 = <strong>198</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td>C historically ruled out V; Sep 2025 Muharrem Demirok signalled conditional openness on migration</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>S + C</strong> (grand-centre minority with SD tolerance? — politically toxic for S)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 = <strong>145</strong></td><td align="center">❌</td><td>Below threshold; SD support unthinkable for S</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>S + C + MP</strong> (excluding V)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 + 19 = <strong>164</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (11 short)</td><td>Would need V tolerance, back to #2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Tidö-continued</strong> (M + KD + L + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 16 + 65 = <strong>160</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (15 short)</td><td>Below threshold under April polling</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tidö + L replaced by C</strong> (M + KD + C + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 26 + 65 = <strong>170</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (5 short)</td><td>C has ruled out SD cooperation; would implode C</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>"Grand coalition" S + M</strong></td><td align="center">119 + 62 = <strong>181</strong></td><td align="center">🟧</td><td>No mainstream support in either party; historically unprecedented in Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Most probable post-2026 government <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>Scenario #2 (S + V + MP + C)</strong> is the <strong>only mathematically viable AND politically plausible</strong> configuration under current polling. The April 2026 opposition wave has a specific effect: it <strong>demonstrates operational capacity for exactly this configuration</strong> ahead of post-election negotiations. Whether intentional or not, the wave functions as <strong>coalition-capability signalling</strong> to C's own voters and party apparatus.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h3>
 <p>Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government with V — a boundary C has historically policed strongly. The April wave provides <strong>three data points on C's posture</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Poi
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Interpretation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: C's filing pattern is <strong>consistent with conditional post-election cooperation, not fusion</strong>. It signals "we can govern with them on issue-by-issue basis" not "we are a bloc with them". This is exactly the <strong>tolerated minority-government</strong> arithmetic that has characterised Swedish politics since 2014 (Löfven I S-MP with V tolerance; Löfven II S-MP-C-L decemberöverenskommelse; Andersson S minority with V tolerance).</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cabinet</strong>: S + MP (two-party cabinet, ~138 seats represented)</li>
 <li><strong>Budget confidence</strong>: V + C tolerate with <strong>policy-specific red lines</strong> (V on welfare spending, C on fiscal discipline)</li>
@@ -6409,7 +6409,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational fo
 <li><strong>Stability forecast</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — comparable to Löfven II (survived ~3 years before early-triggered crisis)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining five months to the election:</p>
 
 
@@ -6456,7 +6456,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–
 <p><strong>Most informative single indicator <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>The June 2026 chamber vote on the April motion cluster.</strong> If S+V+MP+C vote together on even 3 of the 7 clusters, scenario #2 prior rises to ≥ 0.70. If the cluster fractures below 2, scenario #2 prior falls to ≤ 0.45 and the election becomes more genuinely contested.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6499,7 +6499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Invalidating event</th><th>Effect</th><th>Re-run trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>L drops below 4 % in two consecutive polls</strong></td><td>Tidö loses 15+ seats; opposition math widens further</td><td>Update bloc totals immediately</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L recovers to ≥ 5 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~5 seats; still short but not decisively</td><td>Revise seat table</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD surge to ≥ 22 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~12 seats; scenario #5 re-enters 🟧 range</td><td>Add scenario #5 detail</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S–V open split (V declares no tolerance)</strong></td><td>Scenario #2 collapses to scenario #1 (172 seats, short); deadlock</td><td>Major revision</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C joins centre-right talks post-election</strong></td><td>Scenario #6 moves from ❌ to 🟧; six-way negotiation</td><td>Rework §5 fully</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early-election trigger before Sep 2026</strong></td><td>Entire framework re-baselines</td><td>Not expected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> The Tidö government has already lost its projected majority under April 2026 polling — <strong>before</strong> the wave polling effect is applied.</li>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> Scenario #2 (S+V+MP+C cooperation) is the only viable post-election government configuration and the April wave is consistent with capability-signalling for it.</li>
@@ -6508,7 +6508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Con
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Reviewer note</strong>: seat projections use Sainte-Laguë allocation with 4 % threshold; the Novus April mid-month average is the baseline. Update this file when the May 20, 2026 polls are published. The <code>historical-baseline.md</code> polling-delta priors feed directly into §4 here.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6543,11 +6543,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Why this matters</strong>: ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 8 mandates international benchmarking for P0/P1 documents on policy reform. Three of the four April 2026 opposition-motion clusters meet that threshold. Without comparative context, Swedish-domestic framing becomes self-referential and obscures whether the government's reforms are inside or outside the Nordic/EU policy mainstream.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) combines centralised Migrationsverket-run facilities, private-sector operation, time-limited benefits, and activation duties. Four opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024076/80/87/89). S's HD024080 specifically attacks <strong>private-sector operation</strong>. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6638,7 +6638,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comp
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>private-operation provision</strong> is the <strong>distinctive Swedish outlier</strong> relative to Nordic peers. Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Netherlands all operate state-centred reception without private sub-contracting of housing. Germany permits private operation <strong>under Länder-level oversight</strong> — this is the closest parallel, but it exists because of German federalism, not by design. Austria briefly experimented with BBU-GmbH (state-owned limited company) and private sub-contracting; the experiment generated repeated public scandals over housing conditions (2018–2021) and Austria has since rolled back private contracts. <strong>S's HD024080 anti-privatisation frame is therefore aligned with comparative best practice, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h4>
 <p>The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Conditions) sets <strong>minimum standards</strong> for reception, including:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Article 17: material reception conditions must "ensure adequate standard of living"</li>
@@ -6650,11 +6650,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on
 <p><strong>MP's HD024087 argument <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Explicitly invokes the EU Pact, arguing the new reception law's private-operator provisions risk non-compliance with Art. 17 (material conditions). <strong>Comparative strength</strong>: The Austrian BBU experience shows private operators generated documented non-compliance with exactly this article. MP's legal frame is therefore evidence-supported.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:235 expands deportation triggers for non-citizens convicted of crimes. Three opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024090/95/97). C's HD024095 demands <strong>statutory proportionality testing</strong> ("systematic repeated offences over time"). Does this align with European practice?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6734,17 +6734,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparat
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>statutory proportionality test is the modal European approach</strong>. Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, UK, and Belgium all codify deportation-proportionality criteria in legislation, not administrative guidance. <strong>C's HD024095 therefore converges with the European statutory mainstream</strong> — framing it as a leftist or liberal outlier would be factually incorrect. It is a rule-of-law convergence proposal.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h4>
 <p>Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have <strong>lower adverse ECtHR judgment counts</strong> (mean 1.67) than administrative-test jurisdictions (Sweden, Norway: mean 3.5). The correlation is not perfectly causal — ECtHR caseload also depends on litigation capacity — but <strong>statutory specificity does correlate with fewer successful Strasbourg challenges</strong>, which is in the government's own interest.</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Reportable fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The government's legal case for prop. 2025/26:235 would be <em>strengthened</em>, not weakened, by adopting C's HD024095 proportionality language. Opposition editors may use this in newsroom interviews.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes via an <em>extra ändringsbudget</em>. S (HD024082) attacks fiscal framing; MP (HD024098) attacks climate coherence. How does this compare to peer climate-committed democracies 2022–2026?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6802,7 +6802,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt)</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut. Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong>, and the measure is now cited in German policy discourse as an unproductive use of fiscal space that did not buy political goodwill. The Swedish government is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6849,11 +6849,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement C
 <p><strong>Analytic implication <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Sweden's climate-law mechanism is <strong>weaker than Germany, Netherlands, UK, and France</strong> in enforceability. MP's HD024098 cannot easily convert to a <em>Urgenda</em>-style court challenge. The political-accountability route (Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report) is the only credible path. Opposition analysts should manage expectations accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:228 modernises Sweden's arms-export framework post-NATO accession. V (HD024091) rejects totally; MP (HD024096) demands end-user review. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6948,7 +6948,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Co
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>MP's HD024096 end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</strong> (aligned with Norway, Netherlands, post-2021 Germany). It is <strong>not</strong> an outlier, ideological, or anti-defence position. Opposition newsroom framing should reflect this: "MP asks Sweden to match Norwegian practice" is more accurate than "MP demands unprecedented restrictions".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Opposition Motions — Comparative Benchmarking Position
     x-axis "More Restrictive than Peers" --> "More Permissive than Peers"
@@ -6972,7 +6972,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-
 <p><strong>Visualisation reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Seven of the ten cluster motions cluster in the <strong>evidence-supported mainstream quadrant</strong> (top-left) — aligned with Nordic/EU peer practice and supported by measurable data. Three V motions (total-rejection positions) sit in the <strong>ideological outlier</strong> quadrant — not because they are empirically wrong, but because V does not provide a bridge to administrative practice.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7010,7 +7010,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>Reportable statement</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Private asylum housing</td><td>"Of six Nordic/EU peers, only Germany (via Länder discretion) operates similar private-reception contracting. Austria rolled it back after 2018–2021 scandals."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal deportation proportionality</td><td>"Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, UK, and Denmark all use statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 converges with European practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cuts</td><td>"The only peer jurisdiction that cut fuel taxes in 2022–2026 (Germany's Tankrabatt) did not extend the cut due to poor electoral payoff."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export end-user review</td><td>"MP's HD024096 end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-law enforcement</td><td>"Sweden's climate-law mechanism is weaker than Germany's, which produced the 2021 BVerfG ruling forcing emission cuts."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Most-similar design</strong> applied for Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI) — small open-economy parliamentary democracies with welfare states.</li>
 <li><strong>Most-different design</strong> applied for UK, France, Germany — testing whether policy effects replicate across structurally different systems.</li>
@@ -7024,7 +7024,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (cluster-specific comparison)</li>
 <li><code>deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (ECHR alignment)</li>
@@ -7036,11 +7036,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:02 UTC | <strong>Data Depth</strong>: SUMMARY (MCP get_motioner)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7290,7 +7290,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Motion Nr</th><th>Title (EN)</th><th>Party</th><th>Committee</th><th>Domain</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024080</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4080</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>S</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024087</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4087</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024089</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4089</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024076</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4076</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024090</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4090</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4097</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4095</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules (partial)</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024077</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4077</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>V</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024079</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4079</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>S</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024086</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4086</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>MP</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD024082</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4082</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>S</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD024098</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4098</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>MP</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD024078</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4078</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>S</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024084</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4084</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>V</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024085</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4085</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>MP</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD024081</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4081</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>S</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD024083</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4083</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>V</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD024094</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4094</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>C</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD024091</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4091</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>V</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD024096</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4096</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>MP</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>HD024088</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4088</td><td>Consumer credit law</td><td>C</td><td>CU</td><td>Finance/Consumer</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
     "Immigration/Integration" : 10
     "Fiscal/Climate" : 2
@@ -7299,7 +7299,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domai
     "Defense/Arms Export" : 2
     "Finance/Consumer" : 1</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--committee-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[21 Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 14-17, 2026] --> B[SfU: 7 motions&#x3C;br/>🔴 Immigration Cluster]
     A --> C[AU: 3 motions&#x3C;br/>🟠 Integration Housing]
@@ -7315,7 +7315,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-
     style F fill:#69db7c,color:#000
     style G fill:#ffa94d,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7383,22 +7383,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>SfU</th><th>AU</th><th>CU</th><th>SoU</th><th>FiU</th><th>UU</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td><strong>5</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td><strong>4</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>7</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>4</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>21</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-classification-findings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-classification-findings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed motions on <strong>three simultaneous immigration-related propositions</strong> — a coordinated response not seen since the 2022 Migration Package debates. This signals a deliberate opposition strategy to frame immigration as the central political battleground before the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>Both S (center-left) and MP (Green) oppose the government's fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. This unusual alignment of economic-left and climate-green parties creates a unified messaging opportunity: the government is both economically irresponsible (S) and climate-damaging (MP).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>V and MP both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation, continuing a consistent pattern of opposing Sweden's post-2022 defense-industrial pivot. With NATO membership now settled, this opposition has limited practical effect but strong electoral signaling value for their core voters.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>The unusual alignment of S, V, and C against prop. 2025/26:216 (municipal healthcare medical competence) reflects a substantive policy disagreement about regulatory design, not just partisan positioning.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:08 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7472,7 +7472,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Ref
 <p><strong>Scope note</strong>: The table above is restricted to the canonical 21-motion April 14–17 opposition set filed against government propositions. Related parliamentary items (e.g., skr. 2025/26:226 on Sida humanitarian aid and its follow-on motions HD024070 / HD024072) fall outside this dossier's scope and are tracked in a separate skrivelse analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Immigration["🏠 Immigration Policy Cluster"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law]
@@ -7504,8 +7504,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Ne
     Immigration -->|security context| Defense
     P222 -->|enforcement side| P235</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--party-coordination-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-coordination-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph AllFour["All 4 Opposition Parties"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>Reception Law&#x3C;br/>S+V+MP+C]
@@ -7532,8 +7532,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Ali
     style TwoParties fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style OneParty fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--previous-period-cross-references"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-period-cross-references"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p>The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previous run:</p>
 
 
@@ -7561,14 +7561,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Previous Motion</th><th>Today's Related Motion</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024090–HD024097 (April 16)</td><td>Today's April 14-15 motions</td><td>Same policy packages, earlier filings</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097 (MP, deportation)</td><td>HD024090 (V, deportation)</td><td>Parallel rejection strategies</td></tr><tr><td>HD024093 (C, cybersecurity)</td><td>HD024095 (C, deportation)</td><td>C's consistent "more analysis needed" framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>The immigration motions continue opposition strategy from 2024/25 riksmöte when similar restrictions were resisted</li>
 <li>V's complete rejection pattern (HD024090, HD024091) mirrors V's consistent "no" to all security-related legislation since 2022</li>
 <li>MP's partial acceptance approach (HD024097 preserving parts of deportation law) shows MP learning from 2022 when total rejections cost them parliamentary representation</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7601,7 +7601,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cros
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion Cluster</th><th>Economic Context Link</th><th>Data Point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Immigration motions (HD024076/80/87/89)</td><td>Unemployment rising to 8.69% (2025) increases political salience</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax motions (HD024082/98)</td><td>Sweden GDP growth only 0.82% (2024), down from 5.2% (2021)</td><td>World Bank NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG 2024</td></tr><tr><td>Housing motions (HD024077/79/86)</td><td>Integration impacts long-term labour supply; unemployment context</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export (HD024091/96)</td><td>Sweden's defence spending 2.1% GDP (2025) post-NATO</td><td>NATO benchmarking context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>SfU Hearings</strong> (May 2026): All immigration motions will be heard in Social Affairs Committee — expect testimony from Röda Korset, UNHCR Sweden</li>
 <li><strong>FiU Budget Vote</strong> (May 2026): Fuel tax extra budget — HD024082/98 will be voted down but provide campaign material</li>
@@ -7609,7 +7609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Co
 <li><strong>CIA Platform connection</strong>: Voting records for these motions will appear at <a href="https://hack23.github.io/cia/">https://hack23.github.io/cia/</a> when chamber votes occur (June 2026)</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7641,7 +7641,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Reference-exemplar self-audit per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 §Reference Standards</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework versions</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 · DIW v1.0 · Political Risk Matrix v2.0 · Political SWOT v2.2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Iterations</strong></td><td>Pass 1 (2026-04-20 13:10 UTC) → Pass 2 (2026-04-20 14:00 UTC) — both complete</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth achieved</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> on LEAD + co-LEAD clusters; <strong>L2</strong> on tertiary clusters; L1 on baseline artifacts</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data provenance</strong></td><td>Public Riksdagen API · SCB · Novus · SOM-institutet · World Bank · EU Pact documents · RSF · V-Dem · ECtHR HUDOC · national climate-law texts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.</p>
 
 
@@ -7717,7 +7717,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-h
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rule</th><th>Requirement</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Every claim cites dok_id / named actor / vote count / primary source</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>200+ dok_id references; named politicians in all clusters</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Confidence labels on every major claim</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> applied throughout</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Mermaid diagrams with accessible (color-contrast 4.5:1) palettes</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>15+ diagrams; all use cyberpunk-theme-compliant colours</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Quantified risk (L × I × score × ALARP band)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> 15 risks scored</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Multi-framework triangulation (SWOT + STRIDE/MITRE + ACH + scenario-tree)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> TOWS; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> STRIDE + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> ACH + scenario-tree</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>L-tier classification (L1 / L2 / L2+ / L3) assigned per document</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a>; 4 cluster analyses at L2+; top-level at L1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Reference-exemplar file set for P1 priority</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>README, executive-brief, scenario, comparative, methodology-reflection all present</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>International benchmarking for policy-reform P0/P1</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> 4 policy axes, ≥5 comparators each</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>Red-Team / devil's-advocate critique</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Red-Team Box; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td>Bayesian update rules + forward indicators</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §6 ; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> forward-indicator table</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Rule-compliance score</strong>: 10 / 10. All reference-exemplar requirements met.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7810,8 +7810,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>classification-results.md</code></td><td align="center">L1</td><td>Baseline taxonomy; required for all dossiers</td></tr><tr><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>DIW methodology + sensitivity analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>4-cluster SWOT + TOWS interference matrix</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>15 risks scored, Bayesian priors, interconnection graph, ALARP</td></tr><tr><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>6 threats + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE</td></tr><tr><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>8 groups, 20+ named actors, influence graph</td></tr><tr><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>Proposition-motion matrix + coordination network</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; scenario-specific artifact</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; comparative benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Master synthesis; integrates all pillars</td></tr><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>1-page BLUF</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>This file</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>4-party cluster; division-of-labour; 15+ dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>3-party triangulation; ECHR comparative</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; climate-fiscal quantification</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; NATO post-accession context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Baseline artifacts (classification, significance, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder, cross-ref, synthesis)</li>
 <li>Single-frame analysis on each cluster</li>
@@ -7820,11 +7820,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 1
 <li>Synthesis at ~100 lines; SWOT at ~126 lines; risk at ~109 lines</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:09 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-sources-used">📦 Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-sources-used"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources-used">📦 Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-used"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7867,8 +7867,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-sources-used">📦 Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>MCP Tool</th><th>Documents Fetched</th><th>Date Range</th><th>Quality</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdagen motions API</td><td><code>get_motioner</code></td><td>30 documents</td><td>2025/26 riksmöte</td><td>GOOD</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdagen document content</td><td><code>get_dokument_innehall</code></td><td>3 documents (snippet)</td><td>April 14-17</td><td>PARTIAL</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data</td><td><code>world-bank.get-economic-data</code></td><td>2 indicators (GDP, unemployment)</td><td>2021-2025</td><td>GOOD</td></tr><tr><td>Parliamentary speeches</td><td><code>search_anforanden</code></td><td>0 matches (search limitation)</td><td>2025/26</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-selected-for-analysis">📋 Documents Selected for Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-selected-for-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run">Primary Analysis Set (April 14–17, 2026 — not in previous run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-selected-for-analysis">📋 Documents Selected for Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-selected-for-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run">Primary Analysis Set (April 14–17, 2026 — not in previous run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Immigration Cluster — New Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD024080: mot. 2025/26:4080 — Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) — 2026-04-15</li>
@@ -7915,7 +7915,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run">Primary An
 <li>HD024088: mot. 2025/26:4088 — Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) — 2026-04-15</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-quality-notes">📊 Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">📊 Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Full text</strong>: Not available (text field returned null in all get_dokument_innehall calls); snippets available confirm document metadata</li>
 <li><strong>Summary quality</strong>: Good — summaries include party, leading signatory, committee referral, and key policy decisions</li>
@@ -7923,20 +7923,20 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-quality-notes">📊 Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Speeches</strong>: No matching speeches found for these specific motions via search_anforanden (search API limitation)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set">✅ Analysis Artifacts Generated (Reference-Exemplar File Set)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation">Top-level synthesis &#x26; navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set">✅ Analysis Artifacts Generated (Reference-Exemplar File Set)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation">Top-level synthesis &#x26; navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>README.md</code> — folder index, DIW-ranked reading order</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>executive-brief.md</code> — 1-page decision-maker BLUF + 14-day watch window</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> — master synthesis (BLUF, ACH, Red-Team, cross-cluster interference, analyst-confidence meter)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-specialist-audience-artifacts">Specialist-audience artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-specialist-audience-artifacts"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-specialist-audience-artifacts">Specialist-audience artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-specialist-audience-artifacts"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> — ACH 3 hypotheses + 4-scenario tree + Bayesian priors + Red-Team critique</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>comparative-international.md</code> — 4 policy axes × 8+ peer jurisdictions (Nordic + DE/NL/FR + RSF/V-Dem + EU law)</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> — reference-exemplar self-audit + Rule 1–10 compliance matrix</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better">Analytic pillars (all L2 or better)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better">Analytic pillars (all L2 or better)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>classification-results.md</code> — 21 motions taxonomy + L-tier assignment</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>significance-scoring.md</code> — Raw + DIW-weighted scoring + sensitivity analysis</li>
@@ -7946,19 +7946,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better">Analytic pillars (all L2 or better
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code> — 8 groups + 37-actor registry + influence network + fracture-probability tree</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> — proposition → motion matrix + party coordination network</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2">Cluster-level deep dives (per-document L2+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2">Cluster-level deep dives (per-document L2+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code> — LEAD 4-party cluster L2+</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code> — co-LEAD 3-party triangulation L2+</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code> — climate-fiscal cluster L2</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code> — post-NATO cluster L2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-data">Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-data">Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>economic-data.json</code> — World Bank Sweden macroeconomic context</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-baseline"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7994,7 +7994,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:40 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Put the April 14–17 2026 opposition wave in multi-cycle historical context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Riksdagen Öppna Data (document index), SVT/DN/SvD archive, Novus/SOM time-series</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH (public filing index is complete) · 🟧 MEDIUM on cross-period comparability (changing committee structure)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h3>
 <p>Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and hard to falsify without a baseline. This artifact answers three calibration questions that every other artifact in this dossier depends on:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>How often does four-party opposition coordination happen in the Swedish Riksdag?</strong> (bearing on the <code>[HIGH]</code>-confidence "unprecedented" claim in the LEAD cluster)</li>
@@ -8002,7 +8002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Mat
 <li><strong>Does the 2026 wave show quantitatively different coordination patterns compared to past waves — or is it a regression to a well-known Swedish mean?</strong></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h3>
 <p>The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where <strong>≥ 3 opposition parties filed ≥ 10 counter-motions against government propositions within a ≤ 14-day window on a common policy cluster</strong>. Inclusion criteria are deliberately strict so that the 2026 event is judged against its real peers, not noise.</p>
 
 
@@ -8109,7 +8109,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposit
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Period</th><th>Cluster theme</th><th>Parties (filing)</th><th align="center">Counter-motions</th><th>Against gov. of</th><th align="center">Election that year?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>2014-03</td><td>Defence / NATO-adjacent procurement (JAS)</td><td>S, MP, V</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Reinfeldt (M-led Alliance)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>2015-11</td><td>Winter migration package (asylum restrictions)</td><td>V, C, L, (later MP split)</td><td align="center">14</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>2017-02</td><td>Welfare-profit limitation (Reepalu)</td><td>M, C, L, KD</td><td align="center">17</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌ (election 2018)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>2018-04</td><td>Security / FRA signals intelligence reform</td><td>V, C, L</td><td align="center">10</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2018</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>2020-04</td><td>Pandemic extra-budget and Covid-Act</td><td>M, KD, SD</td><td align="center">12</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>2021-06</td><td>Labour-market law (LAS) reform</td><td>V, M, KD</td><td align="center">13</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌ (early-triggered crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>2022-03</td><td>Gang-crime / organised-crime package</td><td>V, MP, C</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Andersson (S)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2022</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>2023-11</td><td>Energy / nuclear re-regulation</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>2024-10</td><td>Migration — return-centres bill</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 10</td><td><strong>2026-04</strong></td><td><strong>Reception + Deportation + Housing + Fuel Tax + Arms + Consumer + Healthcare</strong></td><td><strong>S, V, MP, C</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>21</strong></td><td><strong>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>✅ Sept. 2026</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h4>
 <p>Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period framing:</p>
 
 
@@ -8146,7 +8146,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the
 <p><strong>Revised headline</strong>: The April 2026 wave is the <strong>third four-party S+V+MP+C offensive against the Kristersson government</strong> and the <strong>largest single-wave in motion count (21)</strong> in the 2014–2026 observation window. Its coordination pattern is not novel in type; it is unusually broad in scope.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h3>
 <p>Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates discipline this. For each comparable election-year wave (rows 1, 4, 7) the table below records the wave's quantitative features and the electoral outcome six months later.</p>
 
 
@@ -8194,7 +8194,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Wave</th><th align="center">Motion count</th><th align="center">Parties</th><th align="center">Gov. polling Δ (−3 mo vs −1 mo to vote)</th><th align="center">Opposition polling Δ</th><th align="center">Government change?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">2014-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">S+MP+V</td><td align="center">−1.8 pp</td><td align="center">+1.4 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2018-04</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">V+C+L</td><td align="center">−0.9 pp</td><td align="center">+0.6 pp</td><td align="center">✅ (via 4-mo crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2022-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">V+MP+C</td><td align="center">−1.1 pp</td><td align="center">+1.7 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>2026 median prior</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≈ 10–11</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≥3</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>−1.3 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+1.2 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>3 / 3 = 100 % — but n = 3</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h4>
 <p>The 2026 wave is <strong>larger</strong> (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two reasonable priors follow:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scaling prior</strong>: If motion count is a weak proxy for opposition organisation, and past waves produced ≈ −1.3 pp for the government, the 2026 effect may scale modestly — <strong>expected −1.5 to −2.0 pp</strong> on Tidö bloc aggregate in the Apr–May 2026 Novus / SCB-SOM polls.</li>
@@ -8204,7 +8204,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to
 <p><strong>Forecast window <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Polls released May 6–20, 2026 are the primary calibration moment. A government polling loss <strong>&#x3C; 0.8 pp</strong> falsifies the "broad wave = broad effect" prior and supports the diminishing-returns hypothesis. A loss <strong>> 2.0 pp</strong> supports the scaling prior and moves the Election 2026 prior toward government change.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the <strong>most similar</strong> prior event (same four parties, same government, same migration theme, same parliamentary term), it is the strongest comparator. The deltas below isolate what is genuinely new in 2026.</p>
 
 
@@ -8270,8 +8270,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. C
 <p><strong>Key finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The 2026 wave's <strong>genuine novelty is not coordination existence (that already happened in 2024) but coordination breadth across issue clusters and committees</strong> combined with differentiated framing. This is a <em>qualitative</em> upgrade in opposition operational capacity. It is the opposition equivalent of a combined-arms operation rather than a single-front push.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Opposition counter-motions per riksmöte (partial for 2025/26)"
     x-axis ["2014/15","2015/16","2016/17","2017/18","2018/19","2019/20","2020/21","2021/22","2022/23","2023/24","2024/25","2025/26 YTD"]
@@ -8280,7 +8280,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Trend observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Opposition filing volume has risen ~90% from 2014/15 to 2024/25, with the sharpest acceleration from 2022/23 onward (under the current government). The 2025/26 YTD count of 238 (≈ 60% of the riksmöte elapsed) projects to <strong>≈ 397 by end-of-term if the pace holds</strong> — which would be a new record.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h4>
 <p>Counting the share of opposition motions where <strong>≥ 3 parties file on the same proposition within ≤ 48 hours</strong> of each other:</p>
 
 
@@ -8322,7 +8322,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day
 <p><strong>Systemic finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 wave is not an outlier; it is the <strong>visible peak of a two-year rising trend</strong> in opposition coordination. Treating it as a unique event risks missing the structural change. The more interesting analytic question is <strong>what is causing coordination to rise systematically</strong> — candidate explanations: (1) government's reliance on SD for majority reduces centre-right cross-over options for opposition, collapsing them into one bloc; (2) professionalisation of party-level parliamentary strategy offices; (3) SOM-measured voter polarisation increasing the cost of differentiated opposition.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8363,7 +8363,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This B
 <p><strong>Methodological note</strong>: This historical-baseline artifact is the <strong>confidence-calibration layer</strong> of the dossier. Its purpose is to prevent single-event over-reading. All downstream claims in <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, and <code>risk-assessment.md</code> should be stress-tested against the base rates here, not only against qualitative inference.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coverage</strong>: Riksdagen Öppna Data filing index is complete back to the 2002/03 riksmöte. The 2014–2026 window is chosen because the current five-party bloc structure stabilised post-2014.</li>
 <li><strong>Edge cases</strong>: Rows 2 (2015-11) and 6 (2021-06) involve parties in atypical positions (MP partially opposing own government; V at break point with Löfven II). Treated as opposition-side filings.</li>
@@ -8372,6 +8372,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Confidence on headline baseline claims</strong>: 🟩 HIGH · <strong>Reviewer</strong>: please flag any inter-period comparability concerns (committee reorganisations, rule changes) for the next revision.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -8414,7 +8437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:05.997Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:27.429Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html b/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html
index ead171fe07..fbb5abd3b8 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:06.403Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:27.830Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:06.403Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:27.830Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-20T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:06.403Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:27.830Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-20-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -229,10 +229,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Audience</strong></td><td>Editors-in-chief · political advisors · party whips · newsroom planners</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading time</strong></td><td>3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed <strong>21 coordinated counter-motions</strong> against the government's spring legislative package — the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive of the 2025/26 riksmöte</strong>. The <strong>headline finding</strong> is a historically rare <strong>four-party convergence on a single proposition</strong> (prop. 2025/26:229, <em>New Reception Law</em>) within 72 hours, with each party filing a distinct but mutually reinforcing frame. This establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-things-to-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-things-to-know"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>This is campaign-narrative construction, not coalition rehearsal.</strong> ACH analysis assigns P=0.50 to the campaign-narrative hypothesis vs P=0.35 to coalition-rehearsal. The opposition is locking in timestamped talking points before the summer recess, not preparing to govern.</p>
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidd
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Cluster
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th>Parties</th><th>Watch Out For</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td><strong>Reception Law (4-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande Q2 2026; L backbench sympathy for C's phased amendment</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td><strong>Deportation (3-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>V, C, MP (not S)</td><td>C's statutory proportionality test converges with European mainstream — realistic SfU amendment path</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>S, MP</td><td>Only Germany 2022 Tankrabatt is direct precedent — did not extend. Klimatlagen §5 accountability trigger.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td>V, MP</td><td>Post-NATO positioning; MP's end-user review language aligns with Norway/Netherlands/Germany — mainstream, not outlier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Proba
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Opposition outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 BASE — Government retained, all 4 propositions enacted</td><td align="center"><strong>0.45</strong></td><td>Campaign material only; no reversal within electoral horizon</td></tr><tr><td>🔵 BULL — S-led minority, reception-law partial reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.22</strong></td><td>Partial win: reception + fuel tax reversed; deportation retained</td></tr><tr><td>🔴 BEAR (for government) — S+V+MP+C majority, full reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td><td>Full package reversed; C's HD024095 language adopted statutorily</td></tr><tr><td>⚡ WILDCARD — Inconclusive election / snap re-election</td><td align="center"><strong>0.05</strong></td><td>Motion package becomes amendment-by-amendment negotiation currency</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Why it matters</th><th>Update signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R01</strong> Polarisation lock-in (L×I=25)</td><td>Government has 62% voter support floor on immigration; opposition narrative capped below that floor</td><td>Novus monthly migration-salience polling</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R08</strong> Unemployment context (L×I=16)</td><td>8.69% unemployment 2025 amplifies anti-immigration framing</td><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB, May 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R07</strong> C as pivot party (L×I=12)</td><td>C's HD024095 proportionality amendment could break 4-party front if negotiated</td><td>C leader public statement on SfU amendment posture</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Signal</th><th>What to prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td>Amendment-vote sequencing guidance</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C leader public statement on HD024095</td><td>Updated risk R07 scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union statement on fuel tax</td><td>Rural-voter risk R03 update</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235</td><td>Full cluster scoring update</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>BASE / BULL / BEAR scenario Bayesian update</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Re
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Four opposition parties file coordinated counter-motions against immigration package — historically rare"</td><td>Dok_ids HD024076/80/87/89 within 72 h</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"S's anti-privatisation stance on asylum housing aligns with Nordic peer practice — Sweden is the outlier"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"C's proportionality amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland statutory practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §2</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt — the only peer precedent for Sweden's fuel-tax cut — was not extended"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"MP's arms-export end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, post-2021 German practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Opposition is coalition-ready for post-2026 government" — ACH P=0.35 only; Red-Team critique applies</li>
 <li>❌ "Four-party coordination means S+V+MP+C majority is likely after election" — BEAR scenario P=0.10</li>
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually W
 <li>❌ "Fuel-tax opposition is anti-working-class" — S's HD024082 is a <em>return-with-new-proposal</em> motion, not a cost-of-living rejection</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deeper-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deeper-reading"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Full ACH + Red-Team + cross-cluster interference</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — 4-party division of labour</li>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -493,38 +493,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:10 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Significance</strong></td><td>9.0/10 (Raw) · <strong>9.40 DIW-weighted</strong> on LEAD cluster</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td>PUBLISH IMMEDIATELY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority</strong></td><td><strong>P1</strong> (electoral/policy decisive)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Quality Tier</strong></td><td>🏆 <strong>REFERENCE EXEMPLAR</strong> for opposition-motion analysis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Next Review</strong></td><td>2026-04-27</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 the Swedish opposition filed <strong>21 motions</strong> concentrated in <strong>four coordinated clusters</strong>. The April 2026 wave is the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive</strong> of the 2025/26 riksmöte and establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. Four of the clusters cross filing-time thresholds that constitute <em>prima facie</em> evidence of coordination: the reception-law cluster sees <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions to a single proposition within <strong>72 hours</strong> — historically rare and the headline finding of this dossier. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p>The dominant strategic-logic hypothesis (ACH: P=0.50) is <strong>campaign-narrative construction</strong> rather than coalition-rehearsal or opportunistic signalling. The opposition is using the final pre-election Riksdag cycle to <strong>lock in timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer recess. This distinguishes the April 2026 wave from prior clusters. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Twenty-one opposition motions filed between April 13–17, 2026 represent the most coordinated parliamentary opposition offensive in the current riksmöte. In an historically rare manoeuvre, all four major opposition parties — <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>, <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>, <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>, and <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> — simultaneously filed counter-motions against the government's flagship immigration legislation package, signalling that immigration policy will be the defining battleground of Sweden's September 2026 election.</p>
 <p>The motions target three simultaneous government propositions on immigration (prop. 2025/26:229, 2025/26:235, and 2025/26:215) while also challenging the government's environmentally inconsistent fuel tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236), arms export expansion (prop. 2025/26:228), and healthcare and justice reforms. Sweden's deteriorating economic context — with unemployment rising to 8.69% in 2025 and GDP growth slowing to 0.82% in 2024 — frames a policy environment in which the government has electoral advantage on immigration but exposure on climate credibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 (New Reception Law) within a 72-hour window. <strong>Dok_ids</strong>: HD024076 (V, Tony Haddou), HD024080 (S, Ida Karkiainen), HD024087 (MP, Annika Hirvonen), HD024089 (C, Niels Paarup-Petersen). The filings are a <strong>deliberate division of labour</strong>: V stakes the principled-left position, S anchors welfare-state protection (anti-privatisation), MP internationalises via EU Pact compatibility, C occupies pragmatist-centrist ground with a phased amendment.</p>
 <p>The absence of a joint press conference is strategic: <strong>claimed coordination would attract "coalition of chaos" framing</strong>, whereas parallel messaging projects discipline without vulnerability. Analytically, the division-of-labour pattern survives every available attack vector — a Tidö-aligned attack on V's frame fails against C; an attack on C fails against S. <strong>This is defence-in-depth messaging</strong>, a hallmark of mature opposition tradecraft. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportation — V outright rejection HD024090, C proportionality amendment HD024095, MP partial rejection HD024097) and three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:215 (time-limited housing — V HD024077, S HD024079, MP HD024086). Total immigration motions: <strong>10 of 21 (48%)</strong> — the opposition has made immigration its primary electoral narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>New analytic observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>S is silent on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) while filing on every other immigration track. This is a <strong>revealed strategic choice</strong>: S has concluded that deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party in the current public-opinion environment (70%+ support deportation of convicted foreigners per SOM 2025). The silence signals S's 2026 campaign architecture — <strong>own the economic-welfare immigration narrative, avoid the security-enforcement narrative</strong>. This materially changes post-election coalition calculus: S is not a reliable ECHR-litigation partner post-adoption.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h4>
 <p>S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose the fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. With Sweden's GDP growth at only 0.82% (2024) and 2023 at –0.2%, the government's choice to cut fuel taxes in a supplementary budget creates a credibility gap on climate.</p>
 <p><strong>Quantified climate impact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cut is estimated to add <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> to a 2030 trajectory Sweden is already ~20% behind (Naturvårdsverket 2025). Under Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5, the government must explain incompatibility to parliament — this creates a statutory basis for ongoing challenge by Klimatpolitiska rådet. MP's HD024098 anchors this claim.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative precedent <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut — and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> due to poor electoral payoff.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h4>
 <p>V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation modernization. V's motion explicitly requests rejection of the entire proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports including follow-up deliveries to human rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-NATO context <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024. Public opinion on arms exports has shifted to 58/32/10 favourable (SOM 2025) from 45/45/10 (2021). The cluster is therefore <strong>low electoral consequence but high post-election negotiation value</strong>: if any 2026–2030 government configuration requires V or MP support, HD024091/96 positions become immediate coalition constraints. MP's end-user review language (HD024096) is aligned with Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice — <strong>mainstream Northern European, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h4>
 <p>Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject prop. 2025/26:216 on medical competence in municipal healthcare. C's opposition is the most striking given its centre-right profile — the party argues the reform reduces municipal flexibility and should be redesigned.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-2026 coalition signal <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: S+V+C convergence on healthcare governance is a rehearsal for a potential post-election minority-government working relationship. Coupled with C's amendment position on deportation (HD024095), this is the strongest coalition-rehearsal signal in the cluster.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Counter-hypothesis</strong>: What if the entire cluster has negligible strategic value?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — D
 <p><strong>Red-Team posterior</strong>: The cluster's expected value is <strong>tactical (talking-points, media cycle control)</strong> rather than <strong>strategic (coalition-rehearsal, government-formation preparation)</strong>. The dossier's findings remain valid but the <strong>political-consequence magnitude should be calibrated down</strong>: this is a good campaign input, not a realignment event.</p>
 <p><strong>Integration with main analysis</strong>: We accept the Red-Team critique at 30% weight. It modifies the narrative — this is <strong>the best-coordinated tactical opposition offensive of the riksmöte</strong>, but it is not a strategic re-alignment. See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5 for the scenario-tree consequences.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fiscal, defence, healthcare), rhetorical interference between clusters creates exploitable vectors.</p>
 
 
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference
 <p><strong>Critical finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>"V universal rejectionist"</strong> frame (rows 1, 6) is V's single largest electoral vulnerability. V must sequence its rhetoric to pair rejection with concrete alternatives (e.g., border-capacity investment, Ukraine-lethal-aid affirmation) or lose 1–2 polling points to SD attack ads. V's HD024076, HD024090, and HD024091 texts currently all lead with principled-rejection language; SD will highlight this uniformity.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypoth
 <p>Full ACH analysis: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §1</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessme
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td>Immigration becomes binary-choice election — government "border security" vs opposition "humanitarian alternative"</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition Scenarios</td><td>Current M/SD/KD/L majority retained P=0.50; S-led minority P=0.33; S+V+MP+C majority P=0.12</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Voter Salience</td><td>62% of Swedes support stricter immigration — government has current polling advantage</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Campaign Vulnerability</td><td>Government exposed on climate (fuel tax) and healthcare (3-party opposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Legacy</td><td>If government wins 2026, all four propositions become law and define a decade</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster Value to Opposition</td><td>Tactical (talking points) ≫ Strategic (coalition rehearsal)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (Red-Team adjusted)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government will pass all four immigration+fiscal propositions (prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Immigration will be #1 election issue in 2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax opposition will provide opposition climate narrative</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C will negotiate on deportation proportionality in SfU</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>S will file follow-on motion on 2026–2027 deportation legislation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (P≈0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition forms alternative majority after 2026</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW (P=0.12)</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR issues pilot-judgment vs Sweden within 5 years post-adoption of 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Updates which analysis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> RR1</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C-leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> DR4</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union public position (Transportarbetareförbundet) on fuel tax</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> FR4</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Reception RR2, scenario BULL prior</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Deportation DR5, scenario prior</td></tr><tr><td>May–June 2026</td><td>SfU/FiU/UU chamber votes</td><td>All clusters — locks in BASE scenario</td></tr><tr><td>Rolling</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>Cross-cluster political-consequence magnitude</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>:
 "Four Opposition Parties Unite Against Sweden's Immigration Package in Unprecedented Parliamentary Challenge"</p>
 <p><strong>Alternative Title (EN)</strong>:
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadat
 <p><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>:
 "S, V, MP och C lämnar samordnade motioner mot tre invandringspropositioner medan Socialdemokraterna också utmanar regeringens sänkning av bränsleskatten inför 2026 års val."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a cl
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) multiplier applied per-cluster based on legislative axis (constitutional / electoral / policy / fiscal / international); (2) per-dimension sensitivity analysis ±10%; (3) confidence-weighted ranking.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok_id(s)</th><th>Topic</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW mult.</th><th align="center"><strong>DIW score</strong></th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Electoral</th><th align="center">Coalition risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89</td><td><strong>New Reception Law</strong> — 4-party</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">×0.94</td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td>HD024090/95/97</td><td><strong>Stricter Deportation</strong> — 3-party</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">×0.98</td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td>HD024077/79/86</td><td>Time-Limited Housing — 3-party</td><td align="center">8.8</td><td align="center">×0.93</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD024082/98</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax Cut</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">8.3</td><td align="center">×0.99</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD024091/96</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">7.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>HD024078/84/85</td><td>Crime-Victim Compensation</td><td align="center">7.2</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>HD024081/83/94</td><td>Municipal Healthcare Competence</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>6.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>HD024088</td><td>Consumer Credit Law</td><td align="center">5.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>5.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h3>
 <p>Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects <strong>how much the legislative axis changes the political-system reality</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -1114,8 +1114,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact We
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Multiplier</th><th>Reasoning</th><th>Applied clusters</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td>Highest; alters state powers / rights</td><td>— (none in this cluster set)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral-definitional</strong></td><td align="center">0.98</td><td>Defines a campaign narrative that shapes voter choice</td><td>Deportation (×0.98)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy-defining</strong></td><td align="center">0.94</td><td>Establishes policy architecture persistent ≥ 2 legislative cycles</td><td>Reception (×0.94)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal / climate</strong></td><td align="center">0.99</td><td>Near-full weight; immediate budget + climate-trajectory effects</td><td>Fuel tax (×0.99)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International / defence-industrial</strong></td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>High but conditional on coalition formation</td><td>Arms export (×0.97)</td></tr><tr><td>Social-policy adjustment</td><td align="center">0.93</td><td>Significant but narrower policy scope</td><td>Housing (×0.93)</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory / sectoral</td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>Narrow; affects specific sector only</td><td>Consumer credit (×0.97)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Why DIW matters</strong>: Raw scoring treats all 10-point policy impacts identically. DIW discounts narrower-scope reforms while preserving the full weight of electoral-definitional ones. The result is a <strong>ranking that reflects decision-consequence for the 2026 election</strong>, not merely policy novelty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception L
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Replaces 1994 reception act; introduces private-operator clauses + duty architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>4-party filing within 72 h — unprecedented in current riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Immigration #1 issue in Novus Q1 2026; 62% voter stricter-immigration support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Virtually guaranteed front-page story in SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Government majority; opposition cannot defeat but can amend (C's proportionality)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>10.0/10</strong></td><td>Mean across dimensions (normalised to 10)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.94 (policy-defining axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Dep
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Expands deportation criteria significantly; ECHR proportionality concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>3-party (V+C+MP); <strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Deportation is SD's flagship issue; government-advantage terrain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Tabloid-friendly; C's proportionality amendment drives nuance coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">7/10</td><td>Government majority; C amendment realistic path via L backbench</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.0/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.98 (electoral-definitional axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 20
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Budget-line impact; ~0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year trajectory impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">6/10</td><td>2-party (S+MP); V notably absent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Cost-of-living 74% Novus Q1 2026 priority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Regional media angle (Norrland rural split)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Extra-budget fast-track; definitional government outcome</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.3/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.99 (fiscal/climate axis — near-full weight)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1310,8 +1310,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivi
 <p><strong>Sensitivity verdict <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The LEAD story (reception law) is robust against all tested perturbations. Ranks 3–4 (fuel tax / housing) are tied within uncertainty bands — either could be elevated with minor coordination evidence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-story-decision"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-decision"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this leads</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Historical rarity</strong> — 4-party coordination on single proposition within 72 h is unprecedented in current riksmöte</li>
@@ -1319,14 +1319,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW
 <li><strong>Policy impact</strong> — replaces a 31-year-old reception act with new architecture</li>
 <li><strong>Division-of-labour messaging</strong> — each party occupies distinct rhetorical space, defence-in-depth narrative</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this co-leads despite lower raw</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Electoral-definitional axis</strong> (DIW ×0.98) — nearly full weight</li>
 <li><strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong> — a rare case where <strong>absence</strong> of evidence is primary evidence</li>
 <li><strong>C's statutory proportionality amendment is the most legally-workable opposition motion</strong> in the entire wave</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why secondary</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Climate-fiscal contradiction</strong> provides the opposition's strongest government-credibility attack</li>
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW
 <li>Narrative carries cleanly into summer 2026 European Parliament Fit-for-55 review cycle</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metad
 <p><strong>Article decision</strong>: PUBLISH — CRITICAL political intelligence
 <strong>Article priority</strong>: <strong>P1</strong> (Immediate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — BLUF builds from LEAD cluster</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — scenario priors use DIW-weighted ranks</li>
@@ -1388,17 +1388,17 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:07 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026, with special focus on the immigration cluster (10 motions), fuel tax/climate cluster (2 motions), and arms export cluster (2 motions).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary concerns</strong>: Cost of living, housing, employment security, public safety
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: HIGH — immigration, fuel costs, healthcare all directly affect citizens</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Rural Swedes</strong> (fuel tax): Government's fuel tax cut benefits rural citizens who depend on cars. S's opposition (HD024082) risks alienating this group. Approximately 30% of Swedish workforce commutes by car in rural areas.</li>
 <li><strong>Welfare-dependent citizens</strong> (reception law): The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) affects S's and MP's core voter base — those who believe in comprehensive public services for asylum seekers.</li>
@@ -1407,10 +1407,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — citizen polling data consistently shows immigration as #1 concern</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Will pass all three immigration propositions plus extra budget
 <strong>Motivation</strong>: Tidö agreement mandate + electoral positioning for 2026</p>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong>: Supports all three immigration propositions as part of Tidö agreement. Welcomes the opposition's unified rejection — it confirms M's electoral thesis that only the right-of-centre coalition will enforce Sweden's borders.</li>
 <li><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong>: Strongly supports stricter deportation (HD024090/95/97 motivate their base by showing "the establishment is defending criminals"). New reception law validates SD's decade-long campaign.</li>
@@ -1419,9 +1419,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — coalition voting patterns are predictable</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Coordinated challenge on immigration, fiscal, and defense policy</p>
-<h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> — 6 motions (HD024079/80/82/84/78/81):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Magdalena Andersson's S is pursuing a two-track strategy: (1) accepting some security reform (not opposing deportation outright) while (2) protecting welfare state principles (anti-privatization in HD024080, integration investment in HD024079)</li>
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sectors affected</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Transport/Logistics</strong>: Opposes S+MP fuel tax position; benefits from government's fuel tax cut</li>
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Key conflict</strong>: Transport industry backs government on fuel tax; financial sector cautiously supports C on consumer credit amendment. The business community is fragmented on these motions, with no unified position.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Organizations most vocal</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong>: Opposes prop. 2025/26:229 (new reception law) — supports S, V, MP, C counter-motions</li>
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Civil society is the most organized constituency supporting opposition motions</strong> on immigration.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>EU Commission concerns</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) must comply with EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024)</li>
@@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — EU enforcement timeline is long; NATO pressure is real but informal</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional dimensions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Proportionality in deportation</strong>: C's HD024095 is legally robust — "systematic repeated offenses over time" aligns with ECHR Article 8. If the government ignores this, administrative courts may strike down individual deportation orders.</li>
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a c
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Council on Legislation) has been consulted on all three immigration propositions. Opposition motions reflect areas where Lagrådet expressed reservations.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — constitutional review bodies have long timelines</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Dominant media narrative</strong> (expected coverage):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SVT Nyheter</strong>: "Fyra partier mot ny mottagandelag" (Four parties against new reception law) — likely to be front-page story</li>
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Swedish media behavior on immigration stories is well-established</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Supports["Supports Opposition Motions"]
         CS[Civil Society 🌿&#x3C;br/>Strong support]
@@ -1543,9 +1543,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class=
     style GOV fill:#dc3545,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#007bff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h3>
 <p>Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the influence-network analysis below. Listing is grouped by role category.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamenta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key motion(s)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Ida Karkiainen</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024080</td><td>Reception privatisation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Ardalan Shekarabi</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024079</td><td>Time-limited housing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024082</td><td>Fuel-tax fiscal framing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tony Haddou</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024076</td><td>Reception rights frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Håkan Svenneling</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024091</td><td>Arms-export rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>Janine Alm Ericson</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Party leader + HD024098</td><td>Fuel-tax climate frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>Annika Hirvonen</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024087</td><td>EU Pact compatibility</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>Jacob Risberg</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024096</td><td>Arms end-user review</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td><strong>Niels Paarup-Petersen</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Lead signatory HD024089/95</td><td>Phased amendment + proportionality</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td><strong>Martin Ådahl</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Economic-policy spokesperson</td><td>HD024088 consumer credit</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key decision point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">13</td><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Prime Minister</td><td>Government-wide messaging discipline</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong></td><td align="center">SD</td><td>Tidö signatory</td><td>SD attack-ad strategy owner</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong></td><td align="center">KD</td><td>Deputy PM</td><td>Crime-victim / parent-liability tension</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong></td><td align="center">L</td><td>Tidö party leader</td><td><strong>🔶 Weak link</strong> — rule-of-law sensitivity on proportionality</td></tr><tr><td align="center">17</td><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Migration minister</td><td>Reception-law defence + SfU engagement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Institution</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">18</td><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Council on Legislation</td><td>Yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235 (Q2 2026) — single most consequential pending signal</td></tr><tr><td align="center">19</td><td><strong>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</strong></td><td>Riksdag committee</td><td>Potential constitutional review</td></tr><tr><td align="center">20</td><td><strong>Migrationsöverdomstolen</strong></td><td>Migration Court of Appeal</td><td>Post-adoption administrative review venue</td></tr><tr><td align="center">21</td><td><strong>ECtHR (Strasbourg)</strong></td><td>European Court of Human Rights</td><td>3–5 year pilot-judgment potential on deportation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role in this cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">22</td><td><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong></td><td>Joint remissvar on prop. 2025/26:229 expected</td></tr><tr><td align="center">23</td><td><strong>Rädda Barnen</strong></td><td>Child-welfare concerns on private-operator reception</td></tr><tr><td align="center">24</td><td><strong>Amnesty Sverige</strong></td><td>Critical brief on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">25</td><td><strong>Caritas Sverige</strong></td><td>Reception-law humanitarian coalition</td></tr><tr><td align="center">26</td><td><strong>RFSL</strong></td><td>LGBTQ-asylum deportation concerns</td></tr><tr><td align="center">27</td><td><strong>Diakonia</strong></td><td>Arms-export human-rights advocacy</td></tr><tr><td align="center">28</td><td><strong>Svenska Freds- och Skiljedomsföreningen</strong></td><td>Arms-export policy critique</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business--industry"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Sector</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">29</td><td><strong>Saab AB (Linköping ~15k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Quiet pro-2025/26:228 lobbying; opposes V+MP cluster</td></tr><tr><td align="center">30</td><td><strong>BAE Systems Sweden (Karlskoga ~8k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Aligned with Saab on export flexibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center">31</td><td><strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong></td><td>Labour union</td><td><strong>🔶 Split risk</strong> — may publicly back government fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td align="center">32</td><td><strong>Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR)</strong></td><td>Municipal association</td><td>Concerned about reception-law municipal-capacity burden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">33</td><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet</strong></td><td>Annual Klimatlagen §5 accountability report — key fuel-tax lever</td></tr><tr><td align="center">34</td><td><strong>MSB (Myndigheten för samhällsskydd)</strong></td><td>Disinformation / CIB monitoring</td></tr><tr><td align="center">35</td><td><strong>FOI (Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut)</strong></td><td>Foreign-influence analysis</td></tr><tr><td align="center">36</td><td><strong>ISP (Inspektionen för strategiska produkter)</strong></td><td>Arms-export authorisation authority</td></tr><tr><td align="center">37</td><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket</strong></td><td>Climate-trajectory evidence base</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Actors tracked</strong>: 37 (minimum threshold: 20). ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph OppLeaders["Opposition Leaders"]
         MA["Magdalena Andersson S"]
@@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Clust
 <p><strong>Influence-network reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The key <strong>bridging nodes</strong> are (1) Paarup-Petersen's amendment path to Pehrson (L backbench) — the only opposition → Tidö bridge; (2) <strong>Lagrådet</strong> as the single institutional actor with power to change the government's substantive terms; (3) <strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong> as the split-risk node that could fragment S's working-class narrative on fuel tax. These three nodes deserve disproportionate monitoring effort.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fracture-probability-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h3>
 <p>Where can the opposition coalition fracture, and with what probability?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 Opposition coalition holds&#x3C;br/>through June 2026 chamber votes"]
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class=""
 <p><strong>Highest-probability fracture <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>F5</strong> (SD attack ads force V rejectionism revision). Opposition must execute <strong>M5</strong> (V pairs rejection with concrete alternative) as matter of priority. Next-highest: <strong>F1</strong> (C negotiates). Mitigation <strong>M1</strong> (amendment-first sequencing) addresses both F1 and F3 simultaneously — single highest-leverage move.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Cross-Cluster Interference — influence patterns</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS — stakeholder-informed strategy derivations</li>
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2037,7 +2037,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative ("opposition coordination builds toward 2026 electoral gain"), surface wildcards, and assign prior probabilities that can be updated as forward indicators fire.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <p>Applied to the central question: <em>What is the strategic logic of the April 14–17 opposition-motion wave?</em></p>
 
 
@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: T
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: The opposition's goal is not to prepare for government (too early, polls insufficient) but to <strong>lock in 2026 campaign narratives</strong> before the Riksdag recesses in summer 2026. Motions function as <strong>timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer silence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>Cluster filed"]
 
@@ -2132,8 +2132,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2
 <p>Probabilities are <strong>analyst priors</strong>, zero-sum within each branch. They update as Lagrådet yttranden, polling data, and SfU rapporteur reports arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: SfU/FiU/UU straight-reject opposition motions in May–June; government retains majority in September; all four propositions become law; opposition runs them as 2026–2030 campaign material but cannot reverse them.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BASE:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government R
 <li>Reputational: moderate (climate, possible ECtHR adverse deportation judgment)</li>
 <li>Electoral: favourable to government until 2030</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S-led minority with MP support (±V) but not C; reception-law partial reversal via amendment in Q1 2027. Deportation law retained (S silence locks in). Fuel tax cut reversed. Arms export framework unchanged.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BULL:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BUL
 <li>MP achieves symbolic but not decisive influence</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Partial victory for opposition narrative</strong>: reception and fuel tax reversed; deportation and arms retained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S+V+MP+C 175+ majority; full reversal of reception law, fuel tax, and partial reversal of deportation via statutory proportionality test (HD024095 adopted).</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BEAR-for-government:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Gov
 <li>Sweden climate 2030 target back within plausible range</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Low-probability but high-impact</strong>: requires simultaneous Tidö collapse and opposition discipline — historically rare.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces no 175+ majority configuration; months of negotiation; eventual minority government with no clear mandate. Motions cluster becomes <strong>negotiation currency</strong> rather than governing programme.</p>
 <p><strong>Consequences:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2200,7 +2200,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "M
 <li>Political system instability with 1-2 year horizon for re-election</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Opposition should prepare</th><th>Government should prepare</th><th>Newsroom should prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BASE</td><td>2026–2030 campaign narrative; post-adoption litigation strategy; NGO alliance</td><td>Implementation plan; defensive communications</td><td>Multi-year implementation tracker</td></tr><tr><td>BULL</td><td>Reception-law repeal legislation; coalition-agreement provisions</td><td>Damage-control communications; alternative legislation</td><td>S-leader interview series; legal-analysis series</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR</td><td>Full reversal legislation; new Reception Act drafting; statutory proportionality text</td><td>Post-loss narrative; policy-continuity carve-outs</td><td>Election-reversal analysis; comparative restoration precedents</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD</td><td>Amendment-by-amendment playbook</td><td>Holding-pattern communications</td><td>Minority-government instability explainer</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate</strong>: What if the entire cluster is strategically irrelevant?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a
 <p><strong>Integration</strong>: This Red-Team critique reduces the BASE scenario's political-consequence magnitude, not its probability. The overall scenario tree remains valid; the expected utility to the opposition shrinks.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update
 <p><strong>Update procedure</strong>: Re-score scenario tree when any of these signals fire. If posteriors shift the BASE/BULL/BEAR ranking, update <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>executive-brief.md</code> accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph EarlyNegotiation["Early Negotiation (May-June 2026)"]
         SfU["SfU votes&#x3C;br/>(Reception + Deportation + Housing)"]
@@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — C
     style Implementation fill:#1565C0,color:#FFF
     style Reversal fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — An
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H2 (campaign-narrative) as dominant hypothesis</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Fits evidence pattern; disconfirms available for H1/H3</td></tr><tr><td>BASE scenario probability (0.45)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Polling stable; no Tidö-collapse signals</td></tr><tr><td>BULL scenario probability (0.22)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>S-led minority is plausible but requires favourable polling swings</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR scenario probability (0.10)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historically rare; requires Tidö collapse + opposition unity</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD probability (0.05)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Minority-gov volatility possible but 2022 showed parliament can resolve</td></tr><tr><td>Red-Team posterior (cluster value is tactical not strategic)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Compelling counter-case but not decisive</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian update magnitudes</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Calibrated on historical analogues, but Swedish politics idiosyncratic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> — LEAD story selection and findings</li>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — 14-day watch window</li>
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) Bayesian prior probabilities with forward signals that update L; (2) ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) assessment; (3) risk interconnection graph showing cascade dependencies; (4) scenario-linked risk weighting per <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Likelihood (L)</strong>: 1 (very unlikely) → 5 (near-certain). Expressed with Bayesian prior P(L≥3).</li>
 <li><strong>Impact (I)</strong>: 1 (minimal) → 5 (transformational). Impact magnitude: electoral seats, legislative outcomes, reputational cost.</li>
@@ -2638,8 +2638,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">R#</th><th>Risk description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Band</th><th align="center">Prior P(L≥3)</th><th>Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R01</strong></td><td>Government passes immigration bills over opposition → polarisation lock-in before 2026 election</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>25</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td>Opposition bloc</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R02</strong></td><td>New Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) faces legal challenge at Admin Court on EU Pact / ECHR grounds</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>Government + MP (litigation-support)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R03</strong></td><td>Opposition fuel-tax stance alienates rural voters — S loses seats in Norrland constituencies</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>S Norrland apparatus</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R04</strong></td><td>Arms-export counter-motions (V+MP) create post-2026 coalition-formation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>V + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R05</strong></td><td>Healthcare reform (SoU) passes with S+V+C opposition → implementation friction</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td>Government + SKR</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R06</strong></td><td>Crime-victim compensation changes (prop. 2025/26:214) create unintended consequences for child welfare</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>Socialstyrelsen</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R07</strong></td><td>C breaks from opposition consensus on deportation → negotiates with government</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td>C leadership</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R08</strong></td><td>Rising unemployment (8.69% 2025) amplifies anti-immigration sentiment → opposition narrative harder</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td>Opposition communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R09</strong></td><td><strong>S revealed-preference silence on deportation</strong> becomes durable intra-opposition fracture</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>S + V + MP coordination</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>V's universal-rejectionist pattern triggers SD attack-ad cycle — V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R11</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses → forces amendment</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td>Lagrådet (external)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R12</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax cut triggers EU DG CLIMA infringement preliminary (Fit-for-55 / ETS II context)</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R13</strong></td><td>ECtHR Strasbourg pilot-judgment on deportation expansion (3–5 year horizon)</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Government legal review</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R14</strong></td><td>Transport union (Transportarbetareförbundet) publicly splits from S on fuel-tax cut → damages S working-class brand</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>S + LO dialogue</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R15</strong></td><td>No 175+ post-2026 majority; minority-government instability; snap election 2027–2028</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>All parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The government's three-proposition immigration package (prop. 2025/26:229, 235, 215) will pass with M/SD/KD/L majority. The opposition's 10 counter-motions, while democratically essential, will all fail. This creates a <strong>polarisation lock-in</strong>: the government campaigns on "we secured the borders" while opposition campaigns on "we defended human rights" — both narratives are true and irreconcilable. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (World Bank data), voter anxiety about resource competition makes the government's framing electorally stronger.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2649,7 +2649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Pol
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Materialisation timeline</strong>: SfU → May 2026; Chamber → June 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition strategic response <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: S's pivot to "integration investment" narrative (HD024079) frames integration as economic productivity, not welfare spending. Combine with comparative-international evidence (private-operator clauses outlier even in Nordic context) to shift frame from "border security" to "welfare-state defence".</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Economic context</strong>: Sweden's unemployment rose from 8.4% (2024) to 8.69% (2025) while GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (after –0.2% in 2023). Economic fragility makes voters more receptive to government arguments about limiting immigration-related public expenditure.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2660,8 +2660,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 —
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Q1 2026 LFS results (expected May 2026) will either strengthen or weaken this risk.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Post-adoption, prop. 2025/26:229's private-operator clauses face challenge at Migrationsdomstolen on EU Pact Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 grounds; ultimate ECtHR referral possible within 36 months.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Full elimination requires either government removing private-operator clauses (no political path) or opposition pre-emptively building litigation record — MP's HD024087 is that record.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: MP's HD024087 text explicitly invokes EU Pact — usable as precedent for NGO amicus briefs.</p>
@@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-La
 <li>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar → L ↑ to 4</li>
 <li>Government amends to remove private-operator clauses → L ↓ to 1</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Specific risk</strong>: The extra budget cuts fuel taxes, directly benefiting rural households with longer commutes. S's HD024082 opposing the cut may be read in rural constituencies as "S doesn't care about our fuel costs." S lost Norrland ground in 2022.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination not feasible (S cannot reverse HD024082 filing); reduction requires rural-counter-offer communications strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Ris
 <li>Rural S MPs issue coordinated statement on HD024082 intent → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Major fuel-price spike (OPEC / geopolitical) during campaign → L ↑ to 5</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategic significance</strong>: C's HD024095 on deportation is distinctively moderate — demands proportionality test (systematic repeated offenses). Positions C as potential negotiating partner with government on immigration. If C negotiates, it breaks the four-party opposition front.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. C's negotiation posture is a feature of its political positioning, not elimination-target for opposition. Mitigation is about <strong>channelling</strong> rather than suppressing C.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a
 <li>Paarup-Petersen rejects amendment talks → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Lagrådet cites proportionality test → L ↑ to 5 (government forced to negotiate)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: S filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235 despite filing on reception (HD024080), housing (HD024079), and fuel tax (HD024082). Signals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party. Reveals that "opposition unity" is selective.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination requires S to file on follow-on deportation legislation in 2026–2027. Monitoring is primary mitigation.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals</strong>:</p>
@@ -2710,11 +2710,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on D
 <li>S leadership public statement on deportation proportionality → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>S silence extends through election campaign → L ↑ to 4</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Lagrådet explicitly critiques private-operator clauses; government forced to amend. High-impact but uncertain-likelihood.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE via opposition monitoring and pre-amplification of Lagrådet language in press.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     R01[R01 Polarisation Lock-In&#x3C;br/>L×I=25]
     R08[R08 Unemployment Context&#x3C;br/>L×I=16]
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a
 <p><strong>Cascade reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: R01 (polarisation lock-in) is the <strong>central node</strong> — 6 other risks feed into it. R08 (unemployment) is the <strong>amplification multiplier</strong>. Opposition mitigation should therefore prioritise R08 (labour-market narrative) and R10 (V rejectionism) as the two highest-leverage input nodes.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-visualisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-visualisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Opposition Motions (April 2026)
     x-axis "Low Likelihood" --> "High Likelihood"
@@ -2786,7 +2786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "R13 ECtHR Pilot": [0.28, 0.90]
     "R15 Minority Gov": [0.18, 0.92]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2884,7 +2884,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk I
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SfU committee scheduling of immigration propositions</td><td>Committee dates announced</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R01, R07, R09</td></tr><tr><td>C leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td>Media appearance</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB)</td><td>Monthly release</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R08</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Sweden deportation case rulings</td><td>Any ruling</td><td>Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>R02, R13</td></tr><tr><td>SVT Novus polls on immigration #1 salience</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>FiU committee vote on extra budget</td><td>Committee vote</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R03, R12, R14</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R11, R02</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Transport union public statement</td><td>Press release</td><td>≤ 21 days</td><td>R14</td></tr><tr><td>Saab/BAE quarterly earnings commentary</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R04</td></tr><tr><td>S follow-on motion on 2026-2027 deportation legislation</td><td>Motion filing</td><td>2026-2027</td><td>R09</td></tr><tr><td>Novus migration-salience tracking</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>R12</td></tr><tr><td>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar on 2025/26:229</td><td>Position paper</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>R02, R11</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current coalition stability <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: STABLE (M/SD/KD/L intact)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All immigration propositions will pass as planned</li>
@@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<
 <li>Campaign-narrative lock-in requires sustained media and polling discipline through summer 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — Bayesian scenario weighting + risk activation per scenario</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team critique adjusts R01 consequence magnitude</li>
@@ -2919,7 +2919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2955,7 +2955,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:04 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>Political SWOT v2.2 + <strong>TOWS interference matrix</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Coverage</strong></td><td>All 8 mandatory groups + 4-cluster drill-down</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition counter-strategy against the government's spring legislative package. Analysis below covers:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level SWOT</strong> for the LEAD immigration cluster (primary focus)</li>
@@ -2964,8 +2964,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framew
 <li>All 8 mandatory stakeholder groups</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S1</strong></td><td>Quadruple-party coordination on New Reception Law signals disciplined opposition front</td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C) — all within 72 h of prop. 2025/26:229</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S2</strong></td><td>S's counter-motion on reception law targets private-sector asylum housing — protects vulnerable people and creates positive electoral narrative</td><td>HD024080: "asylboenden ska inte kunna överlåtas i privat drift" — clear anti-privatization platform</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S3</strong></td><td>C takes moderate position on deportation — requires proportionality (systematic repeated offenses) — converges with European statutory mainstream</td><td>HD024095 — aligned with Germany AufenthG §53, Netherlands "glijdende schaal", Denmark Udlændingeloven §26</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S4</strong></td><td>MP's comprehensive rejection of deportation law challenges constitutional proportionality principle; ECHR Art. 8 alignment</td><td>HD024097 — preserves partial law (8 kap. 1-3 §) while rejecting coercive expansion</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S5</strong></td><td>V's total-rejection strategy provides left-flank anchor for opposition messaging</td><td>HD024090 — outright rejection of entire prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S6</strong></td><td>S's challenge to time-limited immigrant housing frames integration as economic investment, not welfare</td><td>HD024079 — Ardalan Shekarabi requests government return with new housing proposals</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S7</strong></td><td>MP's EU Pact compatibility frame (HD024087) gives cluster international-legitimacy authority</td><td>HD024087 cites EU Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 material-conditions standard</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S8</strong></td><td>Division-of-labour frames cover all major voter segments (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric-axis analysis across HD024076/80/87/89</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>W1</strong></td><td>S's positions on immigration are internally contradictory — party supported stricter policies 2022–2024, now opposes them</td><td>S filed HD024080 but governed with stricter policy 2014-2022</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W2</strong></td><td>Four-party coordination masks substantive incompatibility — V's rejection (HD024090) and C's amendment (HD024095) cannot co-govern</td><td>Motion-text comparison V vs C on same proposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W3</strong></td><td>V and MP arms-export motions put them at odds with post-NATO consensus</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58/32/10 SOM arms-export support (2025)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W4</strong></td><td>MP's across-the-board rejection strategy (4 total rejections) risks being seen as obstructionist</td><td>HD024087, HD024097, HD024096, HD024098 — all outright rejections</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) reveals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for centre-left</td><td>S filed no motion on prop. 2025/26:235; filed on every other cluster</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W6</strong></td><td>No joint press conference or coalition statement; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W7</strong></td><td>V's consistent-rejection pattern across immigration + arms creates "universal rejectionist" frame vulnerability</td><td>HD024076 + HD024090 + HD024091 all rejection-structured</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3186,7 +3186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by Thes
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>O1</strong></td><td>Immigration becomes defining election issue — opposition can build 2026 campaign around "humane alternative"</td><td>10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O2</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) gives S+MP ownership of climate narrative</td><td>Sweden GDP 0.82% 2024, unemployment 8.69% 2025 — economic alternative story</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O3</strong></td><td>Healthcare motions (HD024081/83/94) create unusual S+V+C coalition signalling post-2026 cooperation potential</td><td>Three ideologically diverse parties on healthcare governance</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O4</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen report on Sida enables MP+C to demand accountability on government aid effectiveness</td><td>HD024072/70 — adds "good governance" credibility</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O5</strong></td><td>C's proportionality frame on deportation may attract L backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L rule-of-law sensitivity + comparative statutory-test alignment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O6</strong></td><td>Post-adoption ECtHR litigation on deportation creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Swedish ECHR adverse-judgment track record</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O7</strong></td><td>MP's end-user review language on arms (HD024096) aligns with Norwegian/Dutch/German practice — standard-setting</td><td>Comparative analysis §4</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3258,9 +3258,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td>Government M/SD/KD/L majority will pass all four propositions; opposition risks credibility</td><td>prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236/228 all have coalition support</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td>S's opposition to fuel-tax cut may alienate working-class rural voters who benefit</td><td>HD024082 vs Norrland S vote 2022 baseline</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td>Arms-export opposition (V+MP) conflicts with Swedish post-NATO security doctrine</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58% public support continued exports</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td>Coordinated opposition risks being framed as "obstructionism" on security-critical reforms</td><td>Simultaneous rejection on deportation/reception/housing/arms</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's consistent-rejection pattern as "defends criminals / unreliable on Ukraine"</td><td>V's HD024090 + HD024091 joint attack surface</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td>62% voter support for stricter immigration sets a polling floor opposition cannot breach</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 migration salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td>Extra-budget fast-track procedure on fuel tax compresses opposition narrative-building window to ≤ 4 weeks</td><td>FiU extra-budget timetable</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h3>
 <p>The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves. Below: the <strong>≥3-entry interference cells</strong> with strategic impact on the April 2026 opposition campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opport
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO1</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>Sustain coordinated-opposition narrative through summer</strong> with sequential follow-on motions and media events designed to prevent government from reclaiming the agenda</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO2</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C moderate/statutory) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Target L MPs</strong> (Johan Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) via C's amendment frame; L's historical rule-of-law sensitivity + statutory-test comparative alignment creates narrow negotiation window</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × O2 (climate narrative)</strong></td><td><strong>Link housing-privatisation to fuel-tax private-benefit</strong> as "government prioritises private interests over public goods" unified frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO4</strong></td><td><strong>S7 (MP EU Pact compatibility) × O6 (ECtHR litigation)</strong></td><td><strong>Pre-stage EU Commission remissvar + Strasbourg litigation path</strong>; MP's HD024087 text is usable as precedent for post-adoption legal challenge</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST1</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C proportionality, European mainstream) × T4 (obstructionism frame)</strong></td><td><strong>Publish comparative-international analysis</strong> showing C's amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark — neutralises obstructionism charge</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST2</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × T1 (government majority passes)</strong></td><td><strong>Coordinate SfU vote sequencing</strong> — amendment first, then rejection — to prevent "disarray" framing at chamber vote</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × T2 (rural-voter alienation)</strong></td><td><strong>Front Norrland-anchored S MPs</strong> (Joakim Järrebring, Fredrik Lundh Sammeli) in media appearances on welfare-state framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3346,7 +3346,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weakness
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO1</strong></td><td><strong>W1 (S 2015–2022 legacy) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>S must own the 2015 pivot publicly</strong> — frame HD024080 as "learning from experience" to neutralise legacy-credibility gap</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO2</strong></td><td><strong>W5 (S-silence on deportation) × O3 (S+V+C healthcare coalition)</strong></td><td><strong>S should use healthcare coalition as broader S+V+C rehearsal template</strong>; deportation-silence fragments the left only if not compensated by other coordination evidence</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO3</strong></td><td><strong>W2 (V–C incompatibility) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Stage-manage SfU voting</strong>: C's amendment goes first; if passed, C-V-MP-S-L vote together on amended law; if failed, they unify on rejection. Avoid simultaneous V-reject + C-amend vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3387,25 +3387,25 @@ <h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weak
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>WT1</strong> (V universal rejectionism × SD attack ads) and <strong>WT2</strong> (V–C incompatibility × government majority) are the <strong>two critical vulnerabilities</strong> that could collapse the cluster's campaign value. <strong>WO3</strong> is the essential mitigation: disciplined SfU vote sequencing.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish citizens experience immigration policy directly through social services, housing markets, and labour competition. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (up from 8.4% in 2024), citizens in lower-income brackets are receptive to government arguments about limiting new arrivals. However, <strong>S's HD024080</strong> appeals to citizens concerned about privatisation of asylum services — a proxy for welfare-state protection values that resonate with S's base. The fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) speaks directly to household budgets but risks appearing out-of-touch with rural drivers. A <strong>divided citizenry</strong> is the realistic baseline — the opposition's job is to move ~3-5% swing voters, not to flip majority opinion. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>The governing coalition views these counter-motions as expected partisan opposition. For <strong>Tidö-agreement</strong> parties, the immigration cluster validates their legislative agenda. The sheer number of counter-motions (10/21 on immigration) <strong>confirms the opposition's strategy</strong> and allows the government to campaign on "defending Sweden's security" against a unified left-green-centre bloc. <strong>L is the weak link</strong>: Johan Pehrson's historical rule-of-law sensitivity and the comparative evidence backing C's HD024095 proportionality test create a narrow fault line. The fuel-tax counter-motions create a secondary vulnerability — the government must justify why a climate-ambivalent tax cut is in Sweden's interest. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>This batch represents the most coordinated opposition filing in the current riksmöte. <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> under party leader Magdalena Andersson is pursuing a "responsible opposition" strategy — accepting some security reforms while drawing clear lines on welfare-state privatisation (HD024080) and integration investment (HD024079). The <strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> is strategic, not accidental. <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong> under Nooshi Dadgostar maintains a principled rejection stance on all immigration tightening but risks the universal-rejectionist framing. <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong> under Janine Alm Ericson leads on climate issues (HD024098) and humanitarian concerns. <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> occupies the critical swing position — accepting some deportation reform but demanding proportionality (HD024095); C is the most politically interesting actor in this wave because its amendment posture is the bridge between opposition messaging and European mainstream practice. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish industry faces contradictory pressures. The fuel-tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) benefits transport-dependent industries — making S's HD024082 unpopular with business. However, the time-limited housing law (prop. 2025/26:215) addresses industry's need for a stable, integratable workforce — V's HD024077 argues the housing limitation reduces integration success, which over time damages labour supply. Consumer-credit reform (HD024088, C) affects the financial services sector directly. <strong>Defence industry</strong> (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Karlskoga ~8k jobs) opposes V's HD024091 and will quietly lobby committee MPs. <strong>Transport-sector unions</strong> may publicly split from S on HD024082 — a risk S must pre-empt. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>NGOs, church organisations, and refugee-advocacy groups are the strongest supporters of all opposition immigration motions. <strong>Röda Korset</strong>, <strong>Rädda Barnen</strong>, and <strong>Caritas Sverige</strong> have publicly opposed prop. 2025/26:229. Civil-society concerns centre on: (1) private-sector asylum housing (S's HD024080), (2) proportionality in deportation (C's HD024095 / MP's HD024097), and (3) integration investment (S's HD024079). Crime-victim organisations have mixed views on HD024078/84/85 — parent-liability provisions in the crime-victim law create tension with child-protection principles. <strong>Svenska Freds, Diakonia, Amnesty Sverige</strong> form a durable pro-opposition coalition on arms-export motions. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's immigration policy reforms must remain compatible with the <strong>EU Pact on Migration and Asylum</strong> (entered force 2024, phased implementation 2025–2027). <strong>MP's HD024087</strong> explicitly argues the new reception law risks non-compliance with Reg. 2024/1348 Article 17 material-conditions standard. The arms-export motions (HD024091/96) create international friction — <strong>Sweden's NATO partners</strong> (UK, Germany, US) expect continued defence-industry cooperation post-NATO accession. <strong>EU DG CLIMA</strong> is monitoring Swedish fuel-tax policy under Fit-for-55 and ETS II (entering 2027). <strong>ECtHR</strong> remains a durable post-adoption challenge venue on deportation (prop. 2025/26:235). <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Legal scholars have flagged proportionality concerns in prop. 2025/26:235. <strong>C's HD024095</strong> reflects this — requiring "systematic repeated offenses over time" for deportation aligns with European Court of Human Rights proportionality doctrine and converges with Germany/Netherlands/Denmark/Switzerland statutory practice. <strong>V's total rejection (HD024090)</strong> goes further, arguing the entire law conflicts with ECHR Article 8 (family life). <strong>Lagrådet yttrande</strong> on prop. 2025/26:229 and 2025/26:235 is the single most consequential pending signal — expected Q2 2026. Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) has not published a formal opinion. Administrative Courts (Migrationsdomstolen) will become the main post-adoption venue. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish media (SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD) will cover the coordinated opposition filing as a major political story. Public polling (Novus Q1 2026) shows immigration as the #1 political concern for Swedish voters in 2025–2026. The "four parties against one law" narrative is highly newsworthy. The fuel-tax story plays differently: tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) will frame it as "opposition opposes affordable fuel" — a potential negative story for S. Regional/local media (Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT) will cover the Norrland angle on fuel tax. Young-voter media (TikTok, Instagram) favours MP's climate frame. <strong>Press editorial lines</strong> will be split: DN/SvD lean cautiously pro-government; Aftonbladet/ETC lean pro-opposition; Expressen variable. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Immigration["🏛️ Immigration Policy Cluster (10 motions · LEAD)"]
         P229["prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law"]
@@ -3457,7 +3457,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordinatio
     style P228 fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style P216 fill:#17a2b8,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — LEAD finding + ACH + Red-Team</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — LEAD cluster SWOT</li>
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3510,7 +3510,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:06 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td>🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (democratic process functioning normally; specific strategic threats identified)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frameworks</strong></td><td>Threat taxonomy + <strong>Attack-tree</strong> (opposition) + <strong>Kill-chain</strong> (government counter-strategy) + <strong>Diamond Model</strong> (disinformation) + <strong>STRIDE-adapted</strong> (political-process integrity)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or security threat — it constitutes <strong>healthy democratic opposition exercising accountability functions</strong>. The threat dimensions below are <strong>strategic threats to narrative control</strong> (who wins the 2026 campaign), <strong>governance threats to policy coherence</strong> (climate-fiscal contradiction), and <strong>institutional-integrity threats</strong> (disinformation, coordinated inauthentic behaviour around immigration narratives).</p>
 <p><strong>Six substantive threat lines</strong> merit monitoring, mapped across four complementary frameworks:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -3522,7 +3522,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>T6 NEW: Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour</strong> [MEDIUM] — narrative-integrity threat from domestic-foreign influence actors exploiting immigration salience</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 2026 Threat Analysis] --> B[Democratic Process]
     A --> C[Policy Coherence]
@@ -3556,8 +3556,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="t
     style F1 fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style F2 fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration propositions simultaneously risks <strong>locking in a binary political cleavage</strong> that dominates 2026 election discourse to the exclusion of other policy areas. When all major opposition parties align on a single policy dimension:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Simplifies electoral choice in ways that may not reflect voter complexity</li>
@@ -3566,16 +3566,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: 10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration — no other policy area comes close. The concentration signals that the opposition has calculated immigration is their highest-return electoral investment.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — electoral dynamics are inherently uncertain; the threat materialises only if the opposition successfully executes its framing strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), yet the government's prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes in a supplementary budget — a move that adds <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> (Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling) at a time when Sweden is ~20% behind its 2030 trajectory under Klimatlagen 2017:720. S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) both challenge this with different framings but reach the same conclusion: the fuel-tax cut is bad policy.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this is a governance threat</strong>: If the government passes a climate-inconsistent budget measure while claiming climate leadership, it creates a credibility gap that international partners (EU Commission DG CLIMA, climate-finance investors) may exploit. S's demand that the government "return with a new proposal" is procedurally responsible.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative evidence</strong>: Only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt) is a direct precedent; Germany did not extend. Sweden is betting against European experience.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — the climate-fiscal contradiction is factual and measurable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-export ban including follow-up deliveries) signal that a future left-green government would reverse Sweden's post-NATO defence-industrial policy. This creates <strong>policy uncertainty risk</strong> for defence-industry investment decisions. Swedish arms manufacturers (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Systems Karlskoga ~8k jobs) need long-term policy certainty that their export licences will be maintained.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Both motions challenge prop. 2025/26:228. V's motion explicitly rejects the proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports to human-rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — V and MP are currently in opposition with no pathway to government without S.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Immigration-salience political moments in Sweden 2018, 2022, and now 2026 have correlated with <strong>foreign state-linked amplification networks</strong> (documented by MSB and FOI) and <strong>domestic anonymous influence operations</strong> on social platforms. The April 2026 opposition-motion wave provides a high-value target for:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Foreign influence operations</strong> (Russian-linked and Chinese-linked networks per FOI 2024 assessment) amplifying polarising framings</li>
@@ -3627,7 +3627,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium
 <li>Foreign-language amplification of Swedish political debate (Russian, Arabic, English)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h3>
 <p>Modelled from <strong>government-perspective</strong>: how might the government/SD dismantle the opposition's four-party narrative?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Break 4-party opposition narrative&#x3C;br/>before 2026 election"]
@@ -3688,7 +3688,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">
 <p><strong>Highest-feasibility attack vectors</strong> (dark orange): <strong>A1</strong> (V-C split), <strong>A2</strong> (S-silence exploit), <strong>C1</strong> (V rejectionism attack ads), <strong>D1-D3</strong> (party-specific discrediting). <strong>Opposition mitigation priorities</strong> map directly to SWOT TOWS WT1-WT3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h3>
 <p>Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-communications counter-operation:</p>
 
 
@@ -3737,7 +3737,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kil
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Stage</th><th>Government counter-step</th><th>Opposition counter-counter</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1 Reconnaissance</td><td>SD+M opposition-research team analyses V's HD024076/90/91 for rejectionism patterns</td><td>V pre-audits own filing texts for rejection-framing bias</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2 Weaponisation</td><td>SD ad agency produces attack ads: "V abandons Ukraine" (linking HD024091 to Ukraine-support narrative)</td><td>V issues pre-emptive Ukraine-support statement pairing each arms motion</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3 Delivery</td><td>Ads on YouTube, TikTok, Facebook + front-page placement Expressen</td><td>Opposition paid-media counter on same platforms</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4 Exploitation</td><td>Ads exploit cost-of-living anxiety (74% priority — Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Opposition pivots to integration-as-economic-productivity frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5 Installation</td><td>Frame installed via repeated broadcast → "opposition = chaos"</td><td>Opposition produces positive vision: cross-party amendment on HD024095</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6 Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Tidö-coalition daily message discipline enforcing frame</td><td>Opposition four-leader coordinated op-eds (without joint photo)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7 Actions on Objectives</td><td>Polling moves 1–2 points toward M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Mid-campaign frame-shift to climate or healthcare (where opposition wins)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
 <p>Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:</p>
 
 
@@ -3788,7 +3788,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th>Translation to political context</th><th>Manifestation in April 2026 cluster</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Fake actors impersonating politicians / parties</td><td>Deepfake videos of S / V / MP / C leaders pro/anti positions</td><td>Platform verification; rapid-response units</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Altering policy texts or records</td><td>Fake versions of motion texts circulated on social media</td><td>Riksdagen authoritative-text portal; press fact-checking</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Actors denying statements later</td><td>Party leaders claiming "that's not what our motion says"</td><td>Timestamped primary sources; dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation disclosure</td><td>Private-data leaks around politicians</td><td>Hacked constituency data used to target voters</td><td>Cybersecurity; MFA; GDPR enforcement</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of service</td><td>Suppressing legitimate speech</td><td>Spam flooding of comment sections; fake reports to deplatform opponents</td><td>Platform-policy transparency; legal recourse</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of privilege</td><td>Foreign actors posing as Swedish voters</td><td>Foreign-language amplification networks</td><td>MSB/FOI monitoring; platform CIB removal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-level-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3846,7 +3846,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Level</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Framework</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1 Immigration polarisation</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2026 election</td><td>Taxonomy + kill-chain</td></tr><tr><td>T2 Climate-fiscal contradiction</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Immediate</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T3 Arms-export policy uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Post-2026</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T4 Deportation proportionality</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>ECHR review</td></tr><tr><td>T5 Democratic-deficit perception</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T6 Disinformation / CIB</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Immediate–September</td><td>Diamond + STRIDE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: 🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Healthy democratic process with identifiable strategic threats, primarily in the <strong>narrative-capture</strong> and <strong>information-integrity</strong> domains rather than <strong>constitutional / rule-of-law</strong> domains.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3908,7 +3908,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Action</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th>Addressed-to</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Pre-stage V Ukraine-support statement template paired with arms-export motions</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Coordinate SfU amendment-first vote sequencing (mitigates A1 attack)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S+V+MP+C whips</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Issue comparative-international evidence briefing to newsrooms (mitigates C2 obstructionism frame)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Opposition press shops</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Monitor MSB/FOI CIB reports; rapid-response to amplification spikes</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All opposition parties</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Prepare rural S MP media schedule (mitigates D1 + R03)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S Norrland delegation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Pre-audit motion texts for deepfake/rumour pre-emption (STRIDE S/T)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>All four opposition press offices</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Document Lagrådet yttrande preparation; pre-brief journalists</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition legal advisors</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>Establish 24h joint-response rotation for attack-ad counters</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition communications coalition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team + ACH ties directly to T1</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — R10 (V rejectionist) ↔ T1/A1/C1</li>
@@ -3921,7 +3921,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-arms-export-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3969,7 +3969,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>ARMS-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024091 (V), HD024096 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:228 — <em>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>Both 2026-04-16 (same-day dual filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>7.5/10 (minority-bloc opposition on post-NATO defence policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>7.50</strong> (×1.00 — foreign-policy dimension neutral weighting)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral foreign policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🔶 <strong>TERTIARY</strong> story with long-horizon significance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024, ending 200+ years of formal military non-alignment (<em>alliansfriheten</em>). Prop. 2025/26:228 modernises the arms-export legal framework (<em>lag om krigsmateriel</em> + <em>lag om vissa produkter som kan användas för dödsstraff eller tortyr</em>) to align Swedish defence-industrial practice with its new alliance obligations and the post-Ukraine-invasion European armaments market reality.</p>
 <p>The V (HD024091) and MP (HD024096) counter-motions are important <strong>not because they will alter the outcome</strong> — the M/SD/KD/L coalition has a secure majority on foreign-policy questions, and the opposition is split with S absent — but because they are <strong>post-NATO reference points</strong>. They establish, publicly and on the parliamentary record, what a future V/MP/(potential S)-led government would do differently.</p>
 <p>This matters for three audiences:</p>
@@ -3982,7 +3982,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The cluster is a <strong>low-probability, high-consequence signalling event</strong>. With no S and only V+MP filing, it lacks electoral consequence in 2026. But it sets the <strong>baseline parameters of the post-2026 defence-policy debate</strong>. If any government-formation scenario includes V or MP (even as a confidence-and-supply partner), the positions in HD024091 and HD024096 become immediate negotiation constraints.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4012,7 +4012,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Position</th><th>Electoral message</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024091</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Håkan Svenneling</td><td><strong>Complete rejection</strong> of the proposition; preserve pre-existing restrictive regime</td><td>"We do not profit from other people's wars"</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Jacob Risberg</td><td><strong>Conditional acceptance</strong> — ban exports to human-rights-violator states; require follow-up-delivery review</td><td>"Defence yes; profit from oppression no"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Divergence analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: V and MP have historically both opposed arms-export liberalisation but with different intensities. This filing confirms a <strong>persistent 2022 → 2026 ideological gap</strong> between them on defence: V is pacifist-adjacent; MP is "ethical defence" — accepting defence industry but with strict end-user controls. Post-NATO, MP's position is more politically viable; V's position is more electorally costly in the current security environment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4059,7 +4059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession
 <p><strong>Insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Post-NATO context makes this <strong>the weakest cluster</strong> in the April 2026 opposition-motions wave. V and MP are filing for <strong>ideological consistency</strong> rather than electoral leverage. Analysts should weight the motions as <strong>signalling, not policy-influencing</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4137,7 +4137,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Ideological consistency: V and MP have opposed arms-export liberalisation since the 1990s; credible filing</td><td>V 1994–2026 positions; MP 1991–2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's conditional frame (HD024096) is aligned with EU Common Position 2008/944/CFSP criteria 2 (human rights)</td><td>EU Common Position text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — Human-rights NGO support (Amnesty, Svenska Freds, Diakonia) is durable and organised</td><td>NGO historical pattern</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is absent — cannot form majority government opposition with only V+MP</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:228</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024091) is inconsistent with Sweden's Ukraine-support consensus (cross-party ~95%)</td><td>Ukraine lethal aid packages 2022-2025, all-party vote</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — Defence-industrial geographic concentration (Linköping/Saab, Karlskoga/BAE) means local S MPs face job-protection pressure</td><td>Constituency employment data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — Issue has fallen off top-10 voter priorities post-Ukraine invasion</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 issue salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Any future human-rights scandal involving Swedish platform in a recipient country (e.g., Saudi export controversy template) would vindicate MP's frame</td><td>Historical Saudi Arabia controversy</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — MP's end-user review demand could become standard-setting for European export-control modernisation</td><td>EU Common Position review cycle</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Defence-industry excess profits (Saab 22% margin 2024) could fuel populist "war profiteers" frame</td><td>Saab Q4 2024 earnings</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government narrative: "V+MP are unreliable NATO partners" for post-2026 negotiations</td><td>SD and M messaging template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Ukraine allied-support frame ("we help Ukraine by maintaining exports") is electorally dominant</td><td>Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Defence-industry layoff threats (implicit or explicit) during amendment negotiation</td><td>Saab/BAE historical lobbying</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4172,7 +4172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — Th
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cluster's weakness is overwhelming — the <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference (S-absence + NATO-unreliability frame) defines the cluster as a non-decisive signalling event. The interpretive frontier is whether MP's end-user review language (HD024096) gets absorbed into the final UU committee report as a dissenting minority position — that would be the cluster's <strong>only</strong> concrete policy achievement.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6.
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: MP's HD024096 "end-user review" demand is <strong>not an ideological outlier</strong> — it would move Sweden closer to Norway, Netherlands, and post-2024 Germany. Analysts should not report this as a fringe position; it is a mainstream Northern European stance.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4308,7 +4308,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AR1</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 passes without MP's end-user review language incorporated</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>UU minority reservation formalises V/MP position</td><td>UU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>AR2</td><td>Swedish arms used in future recipient-country human-rights incident; vindication for MP frame but reputational damage for Sweden</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Pre-emptive stricter end-user review</td><td>3–7 year horizon</td></tr><tr><td>AR3</td><td>V's total-rejection stance cited by SD as proof V "would abandon Ukraine"</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>V clarifies explicit Ukraine-support carveout</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>AR4</td><td>Defence-industry concentrated-layoff threats influence UU committee negotiations</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td>UU rapporteur independence; media transparency</td><td>UU negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>AR5</td><td>EU Common Position review (2027) adopts language closer to MP's position; Sweden needs to amend retroactively</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP's parliamentary record is usable precedent</td><td>2027+</td></tr><tr><td>AR6</td><td>Post-2026 coalition scenario requires V or MP support; HD024091/96 become negotiation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>Map of alternative coalition configurations</td><td>Post-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4352,7 +4352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>UU rapporteur selection and draft report</strong></td><td>Any inclusion of end-user review language</td><td>May 2026</td><td>AR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab / BAE quarterly earnings</strong></td><td>Public commentary on political risk</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>AR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Svenska Freds annual export analysis</strong></td><td>Data-driven NGO critique</td><td>Annual</td><td>AR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Common Position review</strong></td><td>Brussels-level policy changes</td><td>2027</td><td>AR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Post-election government-formation negotiations</strong></td><td>V/MP coalition conditions if applicable</td><td>Sep–Nov 2026</td><td>AR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         V["V · Håkan Svenneling&#x3C;br/>HD024091&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -4408,7 +4408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
     style Ukraine fill:#ffd700,color:#000
     style NATO_SEC fill:#003399,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 will pass with both motions defeated</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Coalition majority in UU; S non-filing removes only credible threat</td></tr><tr><td>MP's end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Comparative table §6</td></tr><tr><td>V's total rejection vs Ukraine-support coherence gap damages V's electoral standing by 0.5-1%</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Novus polling + Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td></tr><tr><td>Defence industry will publicly intervene in committee process</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Sweden's industry lobbying is usually quiet</td></tr><tr><td>Post-2026 V/MP coalition role includes defence-export renegotiation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Depends on election outcome (P ≈ 0.35 for any V/MP influence)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 5 (defence-policy signalling)</li>
 <li><strong>Threat analysis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>../threat-analysis.md</code></a> T3 (arms export opposition)</li>
@@ -4463,7 +4463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deportation-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>DEPORT-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:235 — <em>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>All 2026-04-16 (same-day triple filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>9/10 (triple-party opposition, constitutional proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.80</strong> (9.0 ×0.98 — electoral-definitional axis per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (P1 policy with ECHR/proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead framing</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h3>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:235 expands the grounds on which non-citizens can be deported following a criminal conviction. It lowers the severity threshold, extends to categories of offence previously requiring repeat conviction, and shortens the procedural window for appeal. The government presents it as a <strong>flagship gäng-kriminalitet response</strong> — a direct continuation of the 2023–2025 organised-crime legislative arc.</p>
 <p>What makes this cluster analytically distinct from the reception-law cluster is that <strong>the three filed counter-motions occupy visibly different positions on the same proportionality axis</strong>, rather than agreeing on one frame. This is not a coordination failure — it is a <strong>deliberate triangulation</strong>, and it demonstrates more sophisticated parliamentary technique than the unified reception-law front:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -4528,7 +4528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This C
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Where the reception-law cluster is a <em>political</em> coordination achievement, the deportation cluster is a <em>legal-rhetorical</em> coordination achievement. The three frames map onto three possible judicial outcomes. This gives opposition parties a durable talking-points inventory for the full litigation lifecycle, not just the 2026 campaign cycle.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4569,7 +4569,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Th
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Legal position</th><th align="center">ECHR alignment</th><th>Post-adoption litigation value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024090</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>Total rejection; law violates equal-protection principle</td><td align="center">Indirect (Art. 14)</td><td>Low — courts cannot strike down statute</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024095</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>Conditional — require "systematic repeated offences over time"</td><td align="center">Direct (Art. 8 proportionality)</td><td><strong>High</strong> — provides appeal template</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024097</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>Partial rejection — preserve 8 kap. 1–3 §; reject coercive expansion</td><td align="center">Indirect (procedural due process)</td><td>Medium — targets specific provisions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Triangulation analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The three motions can be read as a Russian-doll hierarchy of demands. If the government refuses all three, V's position is vindicated as "you see, nothing satisfies them"; if the government accepts C's proportionality test, MP's preservation is automatically satisfied; V loses electorally but gains legally. This structure means the opposition <strong>cannot lose everything</strong> from the filing — at minimum, it has established an evidentiary record for post-adoption challenges.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4647,7 +4647,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aw
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Triangulated frames survive hostile selective reporting; each paper can find a frame that suits its editorial line</td><td>HD024090 (DN), HD024095 (Expressen), HD024097 (Svenska Dagbladet)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — C's HD024095 aligns with Lagrådet's historical proportionality concerns on similar statutes</td><td>C's motion cites 8 kap. 1 § wording with proportionality test</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — MP's preservation logic (HD024097) is the most legally conservative — difficult to attack as obstructionist</td><td>MP explicitly preserves 8 kap. 1-3 §</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024090) anchors the cluster against any government "we met them halfway" framing</td><td>V's rejection text cites ECHR Art. 14 indirectly</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is notably absent from this cluster (filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235)</td><td>Compare: S filed on reception, housing, fuel tax, healthcare — not deportation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on deportation of convicted foreigners runs 70%+ in favour (SOM-institutet 2025)</td><td>SOM-institutet 2025 data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — SD campaign will cherry-pick V's HD024090 "Sweden should not deport criminals" framing</td><td>SD 2022 campaign template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Post-adoption ECHR litigation in Strasbourg creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Pending Sweden ECHR cases backlog</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — C's proportionality frame may attract Liberal (L) backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L historical position on rule-of-law issues</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Lagrådet yttrande may cite C's HD024095 language; elevates it from partisan motion to quasi-consensus</td><td>Lagrådet historically cites committee opposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — S's silence will be framed by opposition-internal critics as "S is too close to government on deportation" — fractures left</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Government argument that deportation is gäng-criminalitet response is electorally dominant (58% support, Novus)</td><td>Novus 2026-Q1 crime salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Administrative Court backlogs mean post-adoption challenges resolve only in 2027–2028</td><td>Sweden admin-court stats</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4682,7 +4682,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference —
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The "S silence" is the <strong>single most revealing signal</strong> in the motions cluster. S has prioritised welfare-state defence over legal-proportionality defence. This is a <strong>strategic choice</strong> that reveals S's 2026 campaign architecture: S intends to own the <em>economic</em> immigration narrative (integration, housing, anti-privatisation) while avoiding the <em>security</em> immigration narrative (deportation, border enforcement). Opposition-bloc analysts should note that this means S is not a reliable partner for ECHR-based challenges post-adoption.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article 8 (family life) because deportation for criminal conduct has been repeatedly upheld by the European Court of Human Rights when:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>The conduct is of sufficient gravity</li>
@@ -4740,7 +4740,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Nordic and continental trend is <strong>towards</strong> statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 is therefore <strong>not a leftist/liberal outlier</strong> — it is a convergence move toward European best practice. Framing it as such in newsroom coverage would materially change the political economy of the motion.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4811,7 +4811,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DR1</td><td>Government rejects all three motions; law passes with expanded triggers; Sweden faces ECHR Strasbourg case within 36 months</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Litigation-ready record already in HD024097</td><td>Post-adoption Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR2</td><td>S-free zone in this cluster becomes durable opposition fracture — V+MP+C cannot form majority without S</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>Requires S to file a motion on subsequent deportation legislation</td><td>2027 follow-on propositions</td></tr><tr><td>DR3</td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's HD024090 "do not deport criminals" soundbite; V drops 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with crime-victim framing</td><td>Pre-election ad cycle Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR4</td><td>C's HD024095 is co-opted by government to add "systematic" qualifier; proportionality test dilutes in drafting</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C leadership must refuse dilutions; protect statutory test</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>DR5</td><td>Lagrådet explicitly cites C's proportionality frame in its yttrande; government is forced to amend</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr><tr><td>DR6</td><td>ECHR issues pilot-judgment against Sweden for disproportionate deportation practice</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td>None (structural); but massive reputational impact</td><td>3–5 year horizon</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</strong></td><td>Any reference to "proportionalitet" or "systematiska upprepade"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>DR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S follow-on motion</strong></td><td>S files motion on follow-on deportation legislation</td><td>2026–2027</td><td>DR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C leader interview on HD024095</strong></td><td>C party leader / Paarup-Petersen media appearance</td><td>Weekly from April 2026</td><td>DR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD ad campaign</strong></td><td>Content analysis of SD social ads for "V defends criminals" framing</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>DR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Administrative Court case filings</strong></td><td>Volume of deportation-order challenges post-adoption</td><td>Monthly 2027+</td><td>DR1, DR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph A["🏛️ Committee-Level Actors"]
         SfU["SfU rapporteur&#x3C;br/>(M/SD/KD)"]
@@ -4910,7 +4910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Mo
     style LAG fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style ECHR fill:#8e44ad,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4948,7 +4948,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertaint
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Uncertainty</th><th align="right">Current prior</th><th>What would update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Will Lagrådet cite C's proportionality language?</td><td align="right">P = 0.40</td><td>Lagrådet historical pattern on committee motions</td></tr><tr><td>Will an L backbencher defect on HD024095?</td><td align="right">P = 0.15</td><td>Any public L statement on deportation</td></tr><tr><td>Will S file a deportation motion in 2026–2027 follow-on legislation?</td><td align="right">P = 0.55</td><td>S 2026 election platform language on crime</td></tr><tr><td>Will ECHR issue pilot judgment vs Sweden within 5 years?</td><td align="right">P = 0.25</td><td>Admin Court case volume after adoption</td></tr><tr><td>Will C's HD024095 survive SfU negotiation intact?</td><td align="right">P = 0.30</td><td>Rapporteur selection and amendment process</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 2 (triple-pressure immigration)</li>
 <li><strong>Related reception cluster</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>./reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
@@ -4967,7 +4967,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5015,7 +5015,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>FUEL-CLUSTER-2026-04-15-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024098 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:236 — <em>Extra ändringsbudget: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Finansutskottet (FiU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-15 (S) · 2026-04-17 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>8.3/10 (climate-fiscal contradiction)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.20</strong> (8.3 ×0.99 — fiscal/climate axis retains near-full weight; per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥉 <strong>SECONDARY</strong> story with electoral-narrative importance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h3>
 <p>The extra budget (<em>extra ändringsbudget</em>) is a mid-cycle supplementary fiscal instrument. Reducing fuel tax via an extra budget is unusual: extra budgets are traditionally reserved for crisis response (pandemic, war, natural disaster). Using one to cut fuel tax signals that the government either (a) believes current fuel prices are a <strong>genuine household-budget crisis</strong> or (b) is delivering an <strong>election-adjacent pocketbook signal</strong> to rural voters within the legal envelope of extra-budget practice.</p>
 <p>The analytic pivot is this: <strong>the fuel tax cut is the only government-policy item in the April 2026 opposition-motion cluster that the opposition can frame as unambiguously contradicting stated government commitments</strong> — in this case, Sweden's Paris Agreement trajectory and the government's own climate mandate under the 2017 Climate Act.</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5027,7 +5027,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cluster is a <em>second electoral pillar</em> for the opposition, independent of the immigration narrative. Opposition strategists will treat this as the <strong>"climate pillar"</strong> to complement the <strong>"humanitarian pillar"</strong> of the immigration clusters. The cluster's value is therefore not in defeating prop. 2025/26:236 (it will pass) but in <strong>building a durable campaign narrative for September 2026</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5060,7 +5060,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Primary frame</th><th>Secondary frame</th><th>Target voter segment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024082</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Mikael Damberg</td><td>Fiscal responsibility — "ineffective spending; return with better proposal"</td><td>Distributional — "tax cut disproportionately benefits higher incomes with larger vehicles"</td><td>Centre-left; suburban S voters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024098</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Janine Alm Ericson</td><td>Climate coherence — "increases emissions; violates Paris and Climate Act trajectory"</td><td>Intergenerational — "shifts costs to future taxpayers via climate penalty"</td><td>Urban-green MP voters; young voters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Data note <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: An earlier draft of this dossier's <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> listed HD024092 as a third fuel-tax counter-motion. That reference was reconciled against the canonical filing index in <code>classification-results.md</code> and <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> (both of which list only HD024082 and HD024098), and removed. The cluster is definitively two-party (S + MP); arguments in this analysis that depend on cluster size are written to the two-party baseline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5138,7 +5138,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Two complementary frames (fiscal + climate) cover centre-left and green voter bases without competition</td><td>HD024082 (fiscal), HD024098 (climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's climate frame is measurable: the cut adds ≈ 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e annually (Naturvårdsverket modelling)</td><td>Naturvårdsverket fuel-tax elasticity models</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — S's procedural "return with better proposal" framing is defensive — hard to attack as obstructionist</td><td>HD024082 motion text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — Rural voters gain directly from the cut; S's HD024082 risks Norrland vote erosion</td><td>S rural-constituency 2022 results</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on fuel taxes is decisively negative (63% support any cut, Novus 2026-Q1)</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — The cut is time-limited (extra budget framing) — reduces long-term climate-accountability leverage</td><td>Extra-budget procedural design</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's climate frame has limited resonance with voters prioritising cost-of-living (74% in Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus priority-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Climate frame aligns with EU Fit-for-55 and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) obligations; international-legitimacy authority for the opposition position</td><td>EU Climate Package</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Young voters (18–29) prioritise climate over fuel cost 52/48 (Ungdomsbarometern 2025); MP's frame captures this cohort</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern 2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Naturskyddsföreningen / WWF / Fridays for Future coalition can amplify MP's frame via civil-society pressure</td><td>Environmental NGO activation patterns</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government can frame S+MP as "elitist" on cost-of-living — inverts S's traditional working-class brand</td><td>SD and M rural-voter messaging</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Extra-budget vote is fast-tracked; opposition has ≤ 4 weeks to build narrative before vote</td><td>FiU fast-track procedure</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Transport-sector unions (Transportarbetareförbundet) may publicly split from S on this issue</td><td>Trade-union historical position</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Climate Act (<em>Klimatlagen 2017:720</em>) obligates the government to pursue policies consistent with the long-term goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 and interim targets:</p>
 
 
@@ -5167,7 +5167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Cont
 <p><strong>Analytic claim <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cut moves Sweden <strong>further away</strong> from its 2030 Climate Act target, at a moment when the government is already ~20% behind that target. MP's HD024098 can cite this as a measurable, reviewable, court-testable obligation breach. In principle, under §5 of Klimatlagen, the government must explain to parliament if a policy measure is incompatible with the climate targets.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5202,7 +5202,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference is the crucial variable. If S does not front Norrland-anchored S MPs in the news cycle, SD will convert this into a "urban elite vs rural family" frame that costs S more electorally than MP's climate frame gains. Historical precedent: 2018 carbon-tax debate (France → Gilets Jaunes) — the lesson is that without a rural counter-offer, climate fiscal policy generates majority backlash.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5261,7 +5261,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of the seven jurisdictions analysed, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt is a direct precedent</strong> for Sweden's proposed cut, and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> because the electoral benefit did not materialise. The proposition is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong> — a point the opposition can cite in newsroom debate.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5323,7 +5323,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FR1</td><td>Fuel tax cut passes; S loses 1–2% Norrland vote before 2026</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Deploy rural S MPs in media; counter-propose transit/EV subsidy</td><td>FiU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR2</td><td>EU Commission initiates infringement proceedings against Sweden for Climate Act / Fit-for-55 backsliding</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>MP escalates via EU remissvar; green-MEP amplification</td><td>Post-adoption Q3-Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR3</td><td>Government narrative ("S and MP out of touch with rural Sweden") dominates 2-week news cycle</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Front rural MPs; counter-propose; attack distributional impact</td><td>Immediate post-filing</td></tr><tr><td>FR4</td><td>Transport unions break publicly from S, endorse government's cut</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>S-union dialogue pre-empting public statement</td><td>Within 14 days</td></tr><tr><td>FR5</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet issues critical report citing the cut</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP in remissvar amplifies Council findings</td><td>Annual report Q1 2027</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5373,7 +5373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which Fi committee MP gets the rapporteur</td><td>≤ 14 days</td><td>FR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norrland local-media coverage</strong></td><td>Content analysis of Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT</td><td>Weekly</td><td>FR1, FR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Transport union statement</strong></td><td>Public position from Transportarbetareförbundet</td><td>Within 21 days</td><td>FR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket Q2 2026 climate report</strong></td><td>Quantified emissions impact estimate</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>FR2, FR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU DG CLIMA monitoring letter</strong></td><td>Any DG CLIMA comment on Swedish policy backsliding</td><td>Q3-Q4 2026</td><td>FR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</strong></td><td>Annual Swedish climate council assessment</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>FR5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         S["S · Mikael Damberg&#x3C;br/>HD024082&#x3C;br/>FISCAL"]
@@ -5429,7 +5429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Clus
     style EU_DG_CLIMA fill:#003399,color:#fff
     style KlimatR fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut adds 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling</td></tr><tr><td>Government will pass the cut</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; Finance Ministry ownership</td></tr><tr><td>S loses ≥1% Norrland vote if rural counter-frame not deployed</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2022 baseline + historical rural-fuel elasticity</td></tr><tr><td>MP's climate frame resonates with 18-29 voters > cost-of-living frame</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern but priority framing effects</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission initiates infringement within 18 months</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>DG CLIMA politically cautious; Sweden in "monitoring" not "procedure" zone</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 3</li>
 <li><strong>Risk assessment</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>../risk-assessment.md</code></a> R03</li>
@@ -5484,7 +5484,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5536,7 +5536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>RCPT-CLUSTER-2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:229 — <em>En ny mottagandelag</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-13 (V) · 2026-04-15 (S, MP, C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>10/10 (unprecedented 4-party coordination)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9.40</strong> (×0.94 — electoral/policy axis, not constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 6 — multi-party coordination on P1 policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead selection</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has not seen <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions against a single government proposition in a 72-hour window at any point in the current riksmöte. The last comparable four-party convergence on an immigration bill was the 2022 "Migration Package" debates — and even then, motions were staggered across a week and coordinated informally. The April 2026 reception-law cluster is <strong>tighter, more public, and more electorally framed</strong> than that precedent.</p>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) is the Tidö government's flagship asylum-reception reform. It replaces the 1994 reception act (<em>Lagen om mottagande av asylsökande m.fl.</em>) with a new architecture that:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5551,7 +5551,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: This is primarily a <em>campaign-narrative construction</em> cluster. The parties are building a broad, electorally legible anti-Tidö story on the dominant 2026 migration issue while preserving differentiated messages for their own voter coalitions (V's total rejection vs. C's proportionality test). A secondary hypothesis is that the cluster also functions as a limited <em>coalition-rehearsal</em> exercise: if the common line holds through chamber vote (expected June 2026), it modestly strengthens the case that a shared opposition front can be sustained after the election. Readers should treat coalition-rehearsal as contingent inference, not as the dominant operational logic.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Committee</th><th>Rhetorical frame</th><th>Core demand</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024076</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Rights-based rejection</em> — "asylum is a right, not a privilege to be earned"</td><td>Total rejection of the law; preserve pre-existing reception act</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024080</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Ida Karkiainen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Welfare-state protection</em> — "asylum housing must not be privatised"</td><td>Remove private-operator provisions; return to parliament with a revised proposal that excludes private asylum housing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024087</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>EU-compliance and humanitarian</em> — "Sweden cannot undercut the EU Pact's minimum standards"</td><td>Reject the law; invoke EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) integration minimums</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024089</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Administrative workability</em> — "reform is too fast, will break municipal capacity"</td><td>Amend the law; phase implementation; restore municipal discretion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Division-of-labour analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Four motions, four distinct frames, one shared target. V takes the principled-left flank; S anchors the welfare-state case; MP internationalises via EU law; C occupies the pragmatist centre. A Tidö-aligned media response that attacks one frame (e.g., "V is soft on criminals") fails against the other three. This is <strong>defence-in-depth messaging</strong> — a hallmark of a coordinated opposition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5683,7 +5683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Unprecedented coordination demonstrates opposition discipline</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89 all filed within 72 hours on same prop.</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — Four distinct frames cover entire voter-coalition surface (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric axis above</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — C's moderate frame (HD024089) insulates cluster from "obstructionism" attack</td><td>C demands amendment, not rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — Publicly visible filing cadence creates sustained news cycle</td><td>4 separate newsroom events over 2 days</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024076) and C's amendment (HD024089) cannot co-govern — coalition is rhetorical, not programmatic</td><td>Compare HD024076 (reject) vs HD024089 (amend) texts</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — S filed HD024080 despite having governed 2014–2022 with successively stricter reception policy — legacy-credibility gap</td><td>S migration-policy shift 2015 (Löfven) → 2022</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — No cluster-wide joint statement or press conference released; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's "EU compliance" frame has limited domestic traction (≤15% of voters cite EU law salience; Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus survey 2026-Q1</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Immigration cluster displaces government agenda for 2–3 news cycles, denying M/SD coverage of other wins</td><td>Expected media cycle post-filing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Post-2026 S+V+MP+C majority scenario (P≈0.15, see scenario-analysis.md) would allow reception-law repeal</td><td>Election prior analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — C's amendment frame creates narrow negotiation channel with L (coalition centrist) — may split Tidö</td><td>L's historical press-freedom / integration posture</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — 62% voter support for stricter immigration (Novus 2026-Q1) means government owns the dominant narrative</td><td>Novus migration-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — SD framing "opposition defends the unvetted" in attack ads will resonate with 2022 SD voters (20% of electorate)</td><td>SD 2022 election data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Legal-aid and housing NGOs may publicly split if S's private-operator carve-out passes into the amended law</td><td>Anticipated Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5718,7 +5718,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The interference <strong>W1 × T1</strong> — the rhetorical incompatibility between V's rejection and C's amendment under a dominant government narrative — is the <strong>single most consequential variable</strong> for whether this cluster converts into durable 2026 electoral advantage. If the four parties can stage-manage the SfU vote sequence (amendment → rejection), the cluster holds. If they cannot, the government's "disarray" frame wins.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but the <strong>combination</strong> of private-sector operation + time-limited benefits + activation duties is on the restrictive end of EU practice.</p>
 
 
@@ -5779,7 +5779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative Interna
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The private-operation provision is the <strong>distinctive outlier</strong>. Only Germany (via Länder-level discretion) offers a close parallel, and Germany's CDU/CSU–SPD governance has maintained active oversight of private operators. The opposition's privatisation-focus in HD024080 is therefore <strong>well-aligned with comparative best practice</strong> — it attacks the provision that deviates most from Nordic peers. See <code>comparative-international.md</code> §1 for full analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5841,7 +5841,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L (1-5)</th><th align="center">I (1-5)</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RR1</td><td>Law passes with private-operator provision intact; S's HD024080 frame fails electorally</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>20</strong></td><td>S must convert housing-privatisation into "welfare-privatisation" umbrella frame</td><td>SfU vote, expected May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR2</td><td>Law challenged at Administrative Court on EU Pact compatibility grounds; ECJ referral possible</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Government legal review shows Pact alignment; MP's HD024087 frame anchors challenge</td><td>Post-adoption legal challenge Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR3</td><td>V's total rejection (HD024076) is singled out in SD attack ads as "pro-illegal-immigration" stance; V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with border-capacity-building alternatives</td><td>SD campaign Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR4</td><td>C's amendment frame (HD024089) is co-opted by government to add minor changes and claim consensus</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C's leadership must refuse any amendment that preserves private-operator core</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>RR5</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 identifies ECHR Art. 8 concerns (family unity); opposition gains legal authority for its position</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet published opinions</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5891,7 +5891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal to watch</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates which risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SfU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which M/SD/KD MP gets the rapporteur role</td><td>Within 14 days</td><td>RR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</strong></td><td>Public release; look for references to "privat aktör" and "rättssäkerhet"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>RR2, RR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Joint opposition press statement</strong></td><td>Four-leader joint presser — holds vs fails coordination</td><td>May 2026</td><td>W1 mitigation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Novus migration salience</strong></td><td>Monthly tracking; focus on "is private asylum housing acceptable?" split</td><td>Monthly 2026</td><td>RR1, RR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L internal debate</strong></td><td>Any L MP (especially Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) breaking on amendments</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>O3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</strong></td><td>Published NGO positions on private-operator carve-out</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>Threat 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Filers["🗳️ Filing Parties (coordination front)"]
         V["V · HD024076&#x3C;br/>Tony Haddou&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -5949,7 +5949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Receptio
     style KD fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style L fill:#fd7e14,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5992,7 +5992,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Four-party coordination is unprecedented in 2025/26 riksmöte</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Filing-date analysis from riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code></td></tr><tr><td>Cluster is lead story of the news-motions run for 2026-04-20</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>DIW weighting + media-attention scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Law will pass despite cluster (prior P ≈ 0.85)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; no defection signal</td></tr><tr><td>C's amendment frame will convert 1–2 L MPs to support</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>L internal divisions historically exist but rarely break Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster will shift Novus migration-issue salience by 2–4 points over 2 weeks</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historical post-filing polling shifts on high-salience issues</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP+C can form post-2026 majority government</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Current polling: S+V+MP+C ≈ 42–45%; would require gains</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 1</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference map</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §Cross-Party Alignment</li>
@@ -6009,7 +6009,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6045,7 +6045,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:55 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Translate the April 2026 opposition coordination into 349-seat arithmetic — which governing combinations become more or less viable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Novus April 2026 trend, SCB-SOM Autumn 2025, Val.se 2022 result, Riksdagen seat distribution</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH on current chamber maths · 🟧 MEDIUM on post-election projections (election 5 months away)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT, scenario, and risk artifacts answer <em>what</em> and <em>why</em>. They do not answer the operational question every editor, civil servant, and foreign desk needs: <strong>which governments are and are not possible after September 2026, and how does the April wave change those numbers?</strong></p>
 <p>This artifact provides:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -6056,7 +6056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic I
 <li>Explicit propagation of the April-wave polling delta (from <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3).</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6113,8 +6113,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">2022 seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong> — Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong> — Sverigedemokraterna</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Government support (Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M</strong> — Moderaterna</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> — Vänsterpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong> — Centerpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong> — Kristdemokraterna</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> — Miljöpartiet</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong> — Liberalerna</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h3>
-<h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h4>
+<h4 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6145,7 +6145,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Key structural fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Tidö majority is <strong>+1 seat</strong> — the narrowest plausible governing majority. A single by-election loss, party-switch, or suspension collapses it. The opposition is <strong>2 seats short</strong> — within polling sampling error. April 2026 is therefore happening in a <strong>genuinely contested</strong> chamber, not a safe-government context.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wave polling effect):</p>
 
 
@@ -6210,7 +6210,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projectio
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>4-percent threshold warning <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: L at 4.3 % is <strong>within the ±1.5 pp Novus sampling band</strong> of the 4.0 % Riksdag threshold. A single bad polling month pushes L below; if L misses the threshold its seats redistribute (≈ 15 of the 16 flow to M/KD/SD under Sainte-Laguë). This is the <strong>single largest single-party uncertainty</strong> in the 2026 election.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6241,7 +6241,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hi
 <p><strong>Inversion finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 pre-wave polling already projects a <strong>~23-seat opposition majority</strong> — a 26-seat swing from the 2022 +1 Tidö majority. If these polling numbers survive to election day, the Tidö bloc <strong>cannot form a government</strong> without a realignment involving C.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h3>
 <p>From <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-year waves is a <strong>−1.3 pp median shift against the government</strong> in the three weeks following a ≥ 10-motion coordinated opposition wave. Applying that prior to the April 2026 polling baseline:</p>
 
 
@@ -6295,8 +6295,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta —
 <p><strong>Decision-useful takeaway <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Across <em>every</em> plausible polling-delta scenario derived from the historical base rate, <strong>the opposition projected seat total remains ≥ 200</strong> and the Tidö total <strong>remains ≤ 160</strong>. The April wave does not create an opposition majority; <strong>it widens an opposition majority that already existed in pre-wave polling</strong>. The correct framing is "opposition widens lead" not "opposition gains lead".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ = mathematically possible (≥ 175 seats) AND politically plausible (no ruled-out blocks)</li>
 <li>🟧 = mathematically possible but requires political compromises with declared ruled-out actors</li>
@@ -6364,12 +6364,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Coalition</th><th align="center">Seats (median delta)</th><th align="center">Viability</th><th>Political barriers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>S + V + MP</strong> (red-green classic)</td><td align="center">119 + 34 + 19 = <strong>172</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (3 short)</td><td>None intrinsic; needs C tolerance</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>S + V + MP + C</strong> (4-party opposition bloc)</td><td align="center">172 + 26 = <strong>198</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td>C historically ruled out V; Sep 2025 Muharrem Demirok signalled conditional openness on migration</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>S + C</strong> (grand-centre minority with SD tolerance? — politically toxic for S)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 = <strong>145</strong></td><td align="center">❌</td><td>Below threshold; SD support unthinkable for S</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>S + C + MP</strong> (excluding V)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 + 19 = <strong>164</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (11 short)</td><td>Would need V tolerance, back to #2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Tidö-continued</strong> (M + KD + L + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 16 + 65 = <strong>160</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (15 short)</td><td>Below threshold under April polling</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tidö + L replaced by C</strong> (M + KD + C + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 26 + 65 = <strong>170</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (5 short)</td><td>C has ruled out SD cooperation; would implode C</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>"Grand coalition" S + M</strong></td><td align="center">119 + 62 = <strong>181</strong></td><td align="center">🟧</td><td>No mainstream support in either party; historically unprecedented in Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Most probable post-2026 government <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>Scenario #2 (S + V + MP + C)</strong> is the <strong>only mathematically viable AND politically plausible</strong> configuration under current polling. The April 2026 opposition wave has a specific effect: it <strong>demonstrates operational capacity for exactly this configuration</strong> ahead of post-election negotiations. Whether intentional or not, the wave functions as <strong>coalition-capability signalling</strong> to C's own voters and party apparatus.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h3>
 <p>Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government with V — a boundary C has historically policed strongly. The April wave provides <strong>three data points on C's posture</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Poi
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Interpretation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: C's filing pattern is <strong>consistent with conditional post-election cooperation, not fusion</strong>. It signals "we can govern with them on issue-by-issue basis" not "we are a bloc with them". This is exactly the <strong>tolerated minority-government</strong> arithmetic that has characterised Swedish politics since 2014 (Löfven I S-MP with V tolerance; Löfven II S-MP-C-L decemberöverenskommelse; Andersson S minority with V tolerance).</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cabinet</strong>: S + MP (two-party cabinet, ~138 seats represented)</li>
 <li><strong>Budget confidence</strong>: V + C tolerate with <strong>policy-specific red lines</strong> (V on welfare spending, C on fiscal discipline)</li>
@@ -6409,7 +6409,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational fo
 <li><strong>Stability forecast</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — comparable to Löfven II (survived ~3 years before early-triggered crisis)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining five months to the election:</p>
 
 
@@ -6456,7 +6456,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–
 <p><strong>Most informative single indicator <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>The June 2026 chamber vote on the April motion cluster.</strong> If S+V+MP+C vote together on even 3 of the 7 clusters, scenario #2 prior rises to ≥ 0.70. If the cluster fractures below 2, scenario #2 prior falls to ≤ 0.45 and the election becomes more genuinely contested.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6499,7 +6499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Invalidating event</th><th>Effect</th><th>Re-run trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>L drops below 4 % in two consecutive polls</strong></td><td>Tidö loses 15+ seats; opposition math widens further</td><td>Update bloc totals immediately</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L recovers to ≥ 5 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~5 seats; still short but not decisively</td><td>Revise seat table</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD surge to ≥ 22 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~12 seats; scenario #5 re-enters 🟧 range</td><td>Add scenario #5 detail</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S–V open split (V declares no tolerance)</strong></td><td>Scenario #2 collapses to scenario #1 (172 seats, short); deadlock</td><td>Major revision</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C joins centre-right talks post-election</strong></td><td>Scenario #6 moves from ❌ to 🟧; six-way negotiation</td><td>Rework §5 fully</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early-election trigger before Sep 2026</strong></td><td>Entire framework re-baselines</td><td>Not expected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> The Tidö government has already lost its projected majority under April 2026 polling — <strong>before</strong> the wave polling effect is applied.</li>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> Scenario #2 (S+V+MP+C cooperation) is the only viable post-election government configuration and the April wave is consistent with capability-signalling for it.</li>
@@ -6508,7 +6508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Con
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Reviewer note</strong>: seat projections use Sainte-Laguë allocation with 4 % threshold; the Novus April mid-month average is the baseline. Update this file when the May 20, 2026 polls are published. The <code>historical-baseline.md</code> polling-delta priors feed directly into §4 here.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6543,11 +6543,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Why this matters</strong>: ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 8 mandates international benchmarking for P0/P1 documents on policy reform. Three of the four April 2026 opposition-motion clusters meet that threshold. Without comparative context, Swedish-domestic framing becomes self-referential and obscures whether the government's reforms are inside or outside the Nordic/EU policy mainstream.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) combines centralised Migrationsverket-run facilities, private-sector operation, time-limited benefits, and activation duties. Four opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024076/80/87/89). S's HD024080 specifically attacks <strong>private-sector operation</strong>. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6638,7 +6638,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comp
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>private-operation provision</strong> is the <strong>distinctive Swedish outlier</strong> relative to Nordic peers. Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Netherlands all operate state-centred reception without private sub-contracting of housing. Germany permits private operation <strong>under Länder-level oversight</strong> — this is the closest parallel, but it exists because of German federalism, not by design. Austria briefly experimented with BBU-GmbH (state-owned limited company) and private sub-contracting; the experiment generated repeated public scandals over housing conditions (2018–2021) and Austria has since rolled back private contracts. <strong>S's HD024080 anti-privatisation frame is therefore aligned with comparative best practice, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h4>
 <p>The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Conditions) sets <strong>minimum standards</strong> for reception, including:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Article 17: material reception conditions must "ensure adequate standard of living"</li>
@@ -6650,11 +6650,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on
 <p><strong>MP's HD024087 argument <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Explicitly invokes the EU Pact, arguing the new reception law's private-operator provisions risk non-compliance with Art. 17 (material conditions). <strong>Comparative strength</strong>: The Austrian BBU experience shows private operators generated documented non-compliance with exactly this article. MP's legal frame is therefore evidence-supported.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:235 expands deportation triggers for non-citizens convicted of crimes. Three opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024090/95/97). C's HD024095 demands <strong>statutory proportionality testing</strong> ("systematic repeated offences over time"). Does this align with European practice?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6734,17 +6734,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparat
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>statutory proportionality test is the modal European approach</strong>. Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, UK, and Belgium all codify deportation-proportionality criteria in legislation, not administrative guidance. <strong>C's HD024095 therefore converges with the European statutory mainstream</strong> — framing it as a leftist or liberal outlier would be factually incorrect. It is a rule-of-law convergence proposal.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h4>
 <p>Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have <strong>lower adverse ECtHR judgment counts</strong> (mean 1.67) than administrative-test jurisdictions (Sweden, Norway: mean 3.5). The correlation is not perfectly causal — ECtHR caseload also depends on litigation capacity — but <strong>statutory specificity does correlate with fewer successful Strasbourg challenges</strong>, which is in the government's own interest.</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Reportable fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The government's legal case for prop. 2025/26:235 would be <em>strengthened</em>, not weakened, by adopting C's HD024095 proportionality language. Opposition editors may use this in newsroom interviews.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes via an <em>extra ändringsbudget</em>. S (HD024082) attacks fiscal framing; MP (HD024098) attacks climate coherence. How does this compare to peer climate-committed democracies 2022–2026?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6802,7 +6802,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt)</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut. Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong>, and the measure is now cited in German policy discourse as an unproductive use of fiscal space that did not buy political goodwill. The Swedish government is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6849,11 +6849,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement C
 <p><strong>Analytic implication <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Sweden's climate-law mechanism is <strong>weaker than Germany, Netherlands, UK, and France</strong> in enforceability. MP's HD024098 cannot easily convert to a <em>Urgenda</em>-style court challenge. The political-accountability route (Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report) is the only credible path. Opposition analysts should manage expectations accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:228 modernises Sweden's arms-export framework post-NATO accession. V (HD024091) rejects totally; MP (HD024096) demands end-user review. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6948,7 +6948,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Co
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>MP's HD024096 end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</strong> (aligned with Norway, Netherlands, post-2021 Germany). It is <strong>not</strong> an outlier, ideological, or anti-defence position. Opposition newsroom framing should reflect this: "MP asks Sweden to match Norwegian practice" is more accurate than "MP demands unprecedented restrictions".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Opposition Motions — Comparative Benchmarking Position
     x-axis "More Restrictive than Peers" --> "More Permissive than Peers"
@@ -6972,7 +6972,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-
 <p><strong>Visualisation reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Seven of the ten cluster motions cluster in the <strong>evidence-supported mainstream quadrant</strong> (top-left) — aligned with Nordic/EU peer practice and supported by measurable data. Three V motions (total-rejection positions) sit in the <strong>ideological outlier</strong> quadrant — not because they are empirically wrong, but because V does not provide a bridge to administrative practice.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7010,7 +7010,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>Reportable statement</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Private asylum housing</td><td>"Of six Nordic/EU peers, only Germany (via Länder discretion) operates similar private-reception contracting. Austria rolled it back after 2018–2021 scandals."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal deportation proportionality</td><td>"Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, UK, and Denmark all use statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 converges with European practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cuts</td><td>"The only peer jurisdiction that cut fuel taxes in 2022–2026 (Germany's Tankrabatt) did not extend the cut due to poor electoral payoff."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export end-user review</td><td>"MP's HD024096 end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-law enforcement</td><td>"Sweden's climate-law mechanism is weaker than Germany's, which produced the 2021 BVerfG ruling forcing emission cuts."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Most-similar design</strong> applied for Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI) — small open-economy parliamentary democracies with welfare states.</li>
 <li><strong>Most-different design</strong> applied for UK, France, Germany — testing whether policy effects replicate across structurally different systems.</li>
@@ -7024,7 +7024,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (cluster-specific comparison)</li>
 <li><code>deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (ECHR alignment)</li>
@@ -7036,11 +7036,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:02 UTC | <strong>Data Depth</strong>: SUMMARY (MCP get_motioner)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7290,7 +7290,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Motion Nr</th><th>Title (EN)</th><th>Party</th><th>Committee</th><th>Domain</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024080</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4080</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>S</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024087</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4087</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024089</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4089</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024076</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4076</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024090</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4090</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4097</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4095</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules (partial)</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024077</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4077</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>V</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024079</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4079</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>S</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024086</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4086</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>MP</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD024082</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4082</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>S</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD024098</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4098</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>MP</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD024078</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4078</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>S</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024084</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4084</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>V</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024085</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4085</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>MP</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD024081</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4081</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>S</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD024083</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4083</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>V</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD024094</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4094</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>C</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD024091</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4091</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>V</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD024096</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4096</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>MP</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>HD024088</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4088</td><td>Consumer credit law</td><td>C</td><td>CU</td><td>Finance/Consumer</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
     "Immigration/Integration" : 10
     "Fiscal/Climate" : 2
@@ -7299,7 +7299,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domai
     "Defense/Arms Export" : 2
     "Finance/Consumer" : 1</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--committee-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[21 Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 14-17, 2026] --> B[SfU: 7 motions&#x3C;br/>🔴 Immigration Cluster]
     A --> C[AU: 3 motions&#x3C;br/>🟠 Integration Housing]
@@ -7315,7 +7315,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-
     style F fill:#69db7c,color:#000
     style G fill:#ffa94d,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7383,22 +7383,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>SfU</th><th>AU</th><th>CU</th><th>SoU</th><th>FiU</th><th>UU</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td><strong>5</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td><strong>4</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>7</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>4</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>21</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-classification-findings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-classification-findings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed motions on <strong>three simultaneous immigration-related propositions</strong> — a coordinated response not seen since the 2022 Migration Package debates. This signals a deliberate opposition strategy to frame immigration as the central political battleground before the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>Both S (center-left) and MP (Green) oppose the government's fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. This unusual alignment of economic-left and climate-green parties creates a unified messaging opportunity: the government is both economically irresponsible (S) and climate-damaging (MP).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>V and MP both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation, continuing a consistent pattern of opposing Sweden's post-2022 defense-industrial pivot. With NATO membership now settled, this opposition has limited practical effect but strong electoral signaling value for their core voters.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>The unusual alignment of S, V, and C against prop. 2025/26:216 (municipal healthcare medical competence) reflects a substantive policy disagreement about regulatory design, not just partisan positioning.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:08 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7472,7 +7472,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Ref
 <p><strong>Scope note</strong>: The table above is restricted to the canonical 21-motion April 14–17 opposition set filed against government propositions. Related parliamentary items (e.g., skr. 2025/26:226 on Sida humanitarian aid and its follow-on motions HD024070 / HD024072) fall outside this dossier's scope and are tracked in a separate skrivelse analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Immigration["🏠 Immigration Policy Cluster"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law]
@@ -7504,8 +7504,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Ne
     Immigration -->|security context| Defense
     P222 -->|enforcement side| P235</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--party-coordination-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-coordination-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph AllFour["All 4 Opposition Parties"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>Reception Law&#x3C;br/>S+V+MP+C]
@@ -7532,8 +7532,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Ali
     style TwoParties fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style OneParty fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--previous-period-cross-references"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-period-cross-references"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p>The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previous run:</p>
 
 
@@ -7561,14 +7561,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Previous Motion</th><th>Today's Related Motion</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024090–HD024097 (April 16)</td><td>Today's April 14-15 motions</td><td>Same policy packages, earlier filings</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097 (MP, deportation)</td><td>HD024090 (V, deportation)</td><td>Parallel rejection strategies</td></tr><tr><td>HD024093 (C, cybersecurity)</td><td>HD024095 (C, deportation)</td><td>C's consistent "more analysis needed" framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>The immigration motions continue opposition strategy from 2024/25 riksmöte when similar restrictions were resisted</li>
 <li>V's complete rejection pattern (HD024090, HD024091) mirrors V's consistent "no" to all security-related legislation since 2022</li>
 <li>MP's partial acceptance approach (HD024097 preserving parts of deportation law) shows MP learning from 2022 when total rejections cost them parliamentary representation</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7601,7 +7601,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cros
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion Cluster</th><th>Economic Context Link</th><th>Data Point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Immigration motions (HD024076/80/87/89)</td><td>Unemployment rising to 8.69% (2025) increases political salience</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax motions (HD024082/98)</td><td>Sweden GDP growth only 0.82% (2024), down from 5.2% (2021)</td><td>World Bank NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG 2024</td></tr><tr><td>Housing motions (HD024077/79/86)</td><td>Integration impacts long-term labour supply; unemployment context</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export (HD024091/96)</td><td>Sweden's defence spending 2.1% GDP (2025) post-NATO</td><td>NATO benchmarking context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>SfU Hearings</strong> (May 2026): All immigration motions will be heard in Social Affairs Committee — expect testimony from Röda Korset, UNHCR Sweden</li>
 <li><strong>FiU Budget Vote</strong> (May 2026): Fuel tax extra budget — HD024082/98 will be voted down but provide campaign material</li>
@@ -7609,7 +7609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Co
 <li><strong>CIA Platform connection</strong>: Voting records for these motions will appear at <a href="https://hack23.github.io/cia/">https://hack23.github.io/cia/</a> when chamber votes occur (June 2026)</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7641,7 +7641,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Reference-exemplar self-audit per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 §Reference Standards</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework versions</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 · DIW v1.0 · Political Risk Matrix v2.0 · Political SWOT v2.2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Iterations</strong></td><td>Pass 1 (2026-04-20 13:10 UTC) → Pass 2 (2026-04-20 14:00 UTC) — both complete</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth achieved</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> on LEAD + co-LEAD clusters; <strong>L2</strong> on tertiary clusters; L1 on baseline artifacts</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data provenance</strong></td><td>Public Riksdagen API · SCB · Novus · SOM-institutet · World Bank · EU Pact documents · RSF · V-Dem · ECtHR HUDOC · national climate-law texts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.</p>
 
 
@@ -7717,7 +7717,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-h
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rule</th><th>Requirement</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Every claim cites dok_id / named actor / vote count / primary source</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>200+ dok_id references; named politicians in all clusters</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Confidence labels on every major claim</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> applied throughout</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Mermaid diagrams with accessible (color-contrast 4.5:1) palettes</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>15+ diagrams; all use cyberpunk-theme-compliant colours</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Quantified risk (L × I × score × ALARP band)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> 15 risks scored</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Multi-framework triangulation (SWOT + STRIDE/MITRE + ACH + scenario-tree)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> TOWS; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> STRIDE + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> ACH + scenario-tree</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>L-tier classification (L1 / L2 / L2+ / L3) assigned per document</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a>; 4 cluster analyses at L2+; top-level at L1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Reference-exemplar file set for P1 priority</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>README, executive-brief, scenario, comparative, methodology-reflection all present</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>International benchmarking for policy-reform P0/P1</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> 4 policy axes, ≥5 comparators each</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>Red-Team / devil's-advocate critique</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Red-Team Box; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td>Bayesian update rules + forward indicators</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §6 ; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> forward-indicator table</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Rule-compliance score</strong>: 10 / 10. All reference-exemplar requirements met.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7810,8 +7810,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>classification-results.md</code></td><td align="center">L1</td><td>Baseline taxonomy; required for all dossiers</td></tr><tr><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>DIW methodology + sensitivity analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>4-cluster SWOT + TOWS interference matrix</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>15 risks scored, Bayesian priors, interconnection graph, ALARP</td></tr><tr><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>6 threats + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE</td></tr><tr><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>8 groups, 20+ named actors, influence graph</td></tr><tr><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>Proposition-motion matrix + coordination network</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; scenario-specific artifact</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; comparative benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Master synthesis; integrates all pillars</td></tr><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>1-page BLUF</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>This file</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>4-party cluster; division-of-labour; 15+ dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>3-party triangulation; ECHR comparative</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; climate-fiscal quantification</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; NATO post-accession context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Baseline artifacts (classification, significance, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder, cross-ref, synthesis)</li>
 <li>Single-frame analysis on each cluster</li>
@@ -7820,11 +7820,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 1
 <li>Synthesis at ~100 lines; SWOT at ~126 lines; risk at ~109 lines</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:09 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-sources-used">📦 Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-sources-used"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources-used">📦 Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources-used"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7867,8 +7867,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-sources-used">📦 Data Sources Used<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>MCP Tool</th><th>Documents Fetched</th><th>Date Range</th><th>Quality</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdagen motions API</td><td><code>get_motioner</code></td><td>30 documents</td><td>2025/26 riksmöte</td><td>GOOD</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdagen document content</td><td><code>get_dokument_innehall</code></td><td>3 documents (snippet)</td><td>April 14-17</td><td>PARTIAL</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank economic data</td><td><code>world-bank.get-economic-data</code></td><td>2 indicators (GDP, unemployment)</td><td>2021-2025</td><td>GOOD</td></tr><tr><td>Parliamentary speeches</td><td><code>search_anforanden</code></td><td>0 matches (search limitation)</td><td>2025/26</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--documents-selected-for-analysis">📋 Documents Selected for Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--documents-selected-for-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run">Primary Analysis Set (April 14–17, 2026 — not in previous run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-selected-for-analysis">📋 Documents Selected for Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-selected-for-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run">Primary Analysis Set (April 14–17, 2026 — not in previous run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Immigration Cluster — New Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD024080: mot. 2025/26:4080 — Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) — 2026-04-15</li>
@@ -7915,7 +7915,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-primary-analysis-set-april-1417-2026--not-in-previous-run">Primary An
 <li>HD024088: mot. 2025/26:4088 — Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) — 2026-04-15</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-quality-notes">📊 Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">📊 Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Full text</strong>: Not available (text field returned null in all get_dokument_innehall calls); snippets available confirm document metadata</li>
 <li><strong>Summary quality</strong>: Good — summaries include party, leading signatory, committee referral, and key policy decisions</li>
@@ -7923,20 +7923,20 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-quality-notes">📊 Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Speeches</strong>: No matching speeches found for these specific motions via search_anforanden (search API limitation)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set">✅ Analysis Artifacts Generated (Reference-Exemplar File Set)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation">Top-level synthesis &#x26; navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set">✅ Analysis Artifacts Generated (Reference-Exemplar File Set)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-artifacts-generated-reference-exemplar-file-set"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation">Top-level synthesis &#x26; navigation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-level-synthesis--navigation"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>README.md</code> — folder index, DIW-ranked reading order</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>executive-brief.md</code> — 1-page decision-maker BLUF + 14-day watch window</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> — master synthesis (BLUF, ACH, Red-Team, cross-cluster interference, analyst-confidence meter)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-specialist-audience-artifacts">Specialist-audience artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-specialist-audience-artifacts"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-specialist-audience-artifacts">Specialist-audience artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-specialist-audience-artifacts"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> — ACH 3 hypotheses + 4-scenario tree + Bayesian priors + Red-Team critique</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>comparative-international.md</code> — 4 policy axes × 8+ peer jurisdictions (Nordic + DE/NL/FR + RSF/V-Dem + EU law)</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> — reference-exemplar self-audit + Rule 1–10 compliance matrix</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better">Analytic pillars (all L2 or better)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better">Analytic pillars (all L2 or better)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>classification-results.md</code> — 21 motions taxonomy + L-tier assignment</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>significance-scoring.md</code> — Raw + DIW-weighted scoring + sensitivity analysis</li>
@@ -7946,19 +7946,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-analytic-pillars-all-l2-or-better">Analytic pillars (all L2 or better
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code> — 8 groups + 37-actor registry + influence network + fracture-probability tree</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> — proposition → motion matrix + party coordination network</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2">Cluster-level deep dives (per-document L2+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2">Cluster-level deep dives (per-document L2+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-deep-dives-per-document-l2"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code> — LEAD 4-party cluster L2+</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code> — co-LEAD 3-party triangulation L2+</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code> — climate-fiscal cluster L2</li>
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code> — post-NATO cluster L2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-data">Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-data">Data<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data"></a></h4>
 <ul class="contains-task-list">
 <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" checked disabled> <code>economic-data.json</code> — World Bank Sweden macroeconomic context</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-baseline"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7994,7 +7994,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:40 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Put the April 14–17 2026 opposition wave in multi-cycle historical context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Riksdagen Öppna Data (document index), SVT/DN/SvD archive, Novus/SOM time-series</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH (public filing index is complete) · 🟧 MEDIUM on cross-period comparability (changing committee structure)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h3>
 <p>Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and hard to falsify without a baseline. This artifact answers three calibration questions that every other artifact in this dossier depends on:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>How often does four-party opposition coordination happen in the Swedish Riksdag?</strong> (bearing on the <code>[HIGH]</code>-confidence "unprecedented" claim in the LEAD cluster)</li>
@@ -8002,7 +8002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Mat
 <li><strong>Does the 2026 wave show quantitatively different coordination patterns compared to past waves — or is it a regression to a well-known Swedish mean?</strong></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h3>
 <p>The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where <strong>≥ 3 opposition parties filed ≥ 10 counter-motions against government propositions within a ≤ 14-day window on a common policy cluster</strong>. Inclusion criteria are deliberately strict so that the 2026 event is judged against its real peers, not noise.</p>
 
 
@@ -8109,7 +8109,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposit
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Period</th><th>Cluster theme</th><th>Parties (filing)</th><th align="center">Counter-motions</th><th>Against gov. of</th><th align="center">Election that year?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>2014-03</td><td>Defence / NATO-adjacent procurement (JAS)</td><td>S, MP, V</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Reinfeldt (M-led Alliance)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>2015-11</td><td>Winter migration package (asylum restrictions)</td><td>V, C, L, (later MP split)</td><td align="center">14</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>2017-02</td><td>Welfare-profit limitation (Reepalu)</td><td>M, C, L, KD</td><td align="center">17</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌ (election 2018)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>2018-04</td><td>Security / FRA signals intelligence reform</td><td>V, C, L</td><td align="center">10</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2018</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>2020-04</td><td>Pandemic extra-budget and Covid-Act</td><td>M, KD, SD</td><td align="center">12</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>2021-06</td><td>Labour-market law (LAS) reform</td><td>V, M, KD</td><td align="center">13</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌ (early-triggered crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>2022-03</td><td>Gang-crime / organised-crime package</td><td>V, MP, C</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Andersson (S)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2022</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>2023-11</td><td>Energy / nuclear re-regulation</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>2024-10</td><td>Migration — return-centres bill</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 10</td><td><strong>2026-04</strong></td><td><strong>Reception + Deportation + Housing + Fuel Tax + Arms + Consumer + Healthcare</strong></td><td><strong>S, V, MP, C</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>21</strong></td><td><strong>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>✅ Sept. 2026</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h4>
 <p>Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period framing:</p>
 
 
@@ -8146,7 +8146,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the
 <p><strong>Revised headline</strong>: The April 2026 wave is the <strong>third four-party S+V+MP+C offensive against the Kristersson government</strong> and the <strong>largest single-wave in motion count (21)</strong> in the 2014–2026 observation window. Its coordination pattern is not novel in type; it is unusually broad in scope.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h3>
 <p>Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates discipline this. For each comparable election-year wave (rows 1, 4, 7) the table below records the wave's quantitative features and the electoral outcome six months later.</p>
 
 
@@ -8194,7 +8194,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Wave</th><th align="center">Motion count</th><th align="center">Parties</th><th align="center">Gov. polling Δ (−3 mo vs −1 mo to vote)</th><th align="center">Opposition polling Δ</th><th align="center">Government change?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">2014-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">S+MP+V</td><td align="center">−1.8 pp</td><td align="center">+1.4 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2018-04</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">V+C+L</td><td align="center">−0.9 pp</td><td align="center">+0.6 pp</td><td align="center">✅ (via 4-mo crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2022-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">V+MP+C</td><td align="center">−1.1 pp</td><td align="center">+1.7 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>2026 median prior</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≈ 10–11</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≥3</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>−1.3 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+1.2 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>3 / 3 = 100 % — but n = 3</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h4>
 <p>The 2026 wave is <strong>larger</strong> (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two reasonable priors follow:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scaling prior</strong>: If motion count is a weak proxy for opposition organisation, and past waves produced ≈ −1.3 pp for the government, the 2026 effect may scale modestly — <strong>expected −1.5 to −2.0 pp</strong> on Tidö bloc aggregate in the Apr–May 2026 Novus / SCB-SOM polls.</li>
@@ -8204,7 +8204,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to
 <p><strong>Forecast window <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Polls released May 6–20, 2026 are the primary calibration moment. A government polling loss <strong>&#x3C; 0.8 pp</strong> falsifies the "broad wave = broad effect" prior and supports the diminishing-returns hypothesis. A loss <strong>> 2.0 pp</strong> supports the scaling prior and moves the Election 2026 prior toward government change.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the <strong>most similar</strong> prior event (same four parties, same government, same migration theme, same parliamentary term), it is the strongest comparator. The deltas below isolate what is genuinely new in 2026.</p>
 
 
@@ -8270,8 +8270,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. C
 <p><strong>Key finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The 2026 wave's <strong>genuine novelty is not coordination existence (that already happened in 2024) but coordination breadth across issue clusters and committees</strong> combined with differentiated framing. This is a <em>qualitative</em> upgrade in opposition operational capacity. It is the opposition equivalent of a combined-arms operation rather than a single-front push.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Opposition counter-motions per riksmöte (partial for 2025/26)"
     x-axis ["2014/15","2015/16","2016/17","2017/18","2018/19","2019/20","2020/21","2021/22","2022/23","2023/24","2024/25","2025/26 YTD"]
@@ -8280,7 +8280,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Trend observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Opposition filing volume has risen ~90% from 2014/15 to 2024/25, with the sharpest acceleration from 2022/23 onward (under the current government). The 2025/26 YTD count of 238 (≈ 60% of the riksmöte elapsed) projects to <strong>≈ 397 by end-of-term if the pace holds</strong> — which would be a new record.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h4>
 <p>Counting the share of opposition motions where <strong>≥ 3 parties file on the same proposition within ≤ 48 hours</strong> of each other:</p>
 
 
@@ -8322,7 +8322,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day
 <p><strong>Systemic finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 wave is not an outlier; it is the <strong>visible peak of a two-year rising trend</strong> in opposition coordination. Treating it as a unique event risks missing the structural change. The more interesting analytic question is <strong>what is causing coordination to rise systematically</strong> — candidate explanations: (1) government's reliance on SD for majority reduces centre-right cross-over options for opposition, collapsing them into one bloc; (2) professionalisation of party-level parliamentary strategy offices; (3) SOM-measured voter polarisation increasing the cost of differentiated opposition.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8363,7 +8363,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This B
 <p><strong>Methodological note</strong>: This historical-baseline artifact is the <strong>confidence-calibration layer</strong> of the dossier. Its purpose is to prevent single-event over-reading. All downstream claims in <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, and <code>risk-assessment.md</code> should be stress-tested against the base rates here, not only against qualitative inference.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coverage</strong>: Riksdagen Öppna Data filing index is complete back to the 2002/03 riksmöte. The 2014–2026 window is chosen because the current five-party bloc structure stabilised post-2014.</li>
 <li><strong>Edge cases</strong>: Rows 2 (2015-11) and 6 (2021-06) involve parties in atypical positions (MP partially opposing own government; V at break point with Löfven II). Treated as opposition-side filings.</li>
@@ -8372,6 +8372,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Confidence on headline baseline claims</strong>: 🟩 HIGH · <strong>Reviewer</strong>: please flag any inter-period comparability concerns (committee reorganisations, rule changes) for the next revision.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-20/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -8414,7 +8437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:06.403Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:27.830Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html b/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html
index 68f583379c..5ec41b8f26 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Committee Reports (April 21, 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:06.843Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:28.235Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:06.843Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:28.235Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Committee Reports (April 21, 2026)","description":"On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a 14-report package that operationalises a three-pillar electoral bet: fiscal relief (FiU48, 4.1B SEK fuel and energy subsidies), enforcement…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:06.843Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md","name":"election-2026-implications.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Committee Reports (April 21, 2026)","description":"On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a 14-report package that operationalises a three-pillar electoral bet: fiscal relief (FiU48, 4.1B SEK fuel and energy subsidies), enforcement…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:28.235Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md","name":"election-2026-implications.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -233,10 +233,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Audience</strong></td><td>Editors-in-chief · political advisors · party whips · newsroom planners · policy analysts</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading time</strong></td><td>3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH (SUMMARY/METADATA + FULL TEXT)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a <strong>14-report package</strong> that operationalises a <strong>three-pillar electoral bet</strong>: fiscal relief (FiU48, 4.1B SEK fuel and energy subsidies), enforcement credibility (SfU22 migration inhibition), and constitutional legacy (KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em> grundlagsändringar that bind the next Riksdag). The <strong>headline finding</strong> is that this is the <strong>first time since the 2014 decemberöverenskommelse</strong> that a sitting government has coordinated pre-election fiscal, enforcement, and constitutional measures within a single committee week. FiU48 and SfU22 both score <strong>22/25</strong> on the significance matrix; their joint adoption defines the spring 2026 inflection point. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-things-to-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-things-to-know"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>FiU48 is simultaneously an election relief measure AND an EU compliance correction.</strong> Cutting petrol tax by 82 öre/liter and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ brings Sweden to the <strong>EU Energy Tax Directive 2003/96/EC floor</strong> — the lowest rate permitted by Brussels. The 4.1B SEK cost is absorbed as a supplementary budget and expires 30 September 2026 — <strong>14 days after the election</strong>. If the government is re-elected it will face pressure to extend; if the opposition wins it inherits a sunset clause that is politically costly to let lapse.</p>
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidd
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance">📊 Top Five Reports, Ranked by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance">📊 Top Five Reports, Ranked by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance">📊 Top Five Reports, Rank
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Report</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Committee</th><th>Watch Out For</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🥇 1</td><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel &#x26; energy relief</td><td align="center"><strong>22/25</strong></td><td>FiU</td><td>Extension pressure post-30 Sept 2026; EU Commission infringement on tax-minimum floor</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥇 1</td><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>Migration inhibition reform</td><td align="center"><strong>22/25</strong></td><td>SfU</td><td>FARR test case Q3 2026; Migrationsöverdomstolen preliminary ruling</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 3</td><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Constitutional accessibility amendment (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td align="center"><strong>19/25</strong></td><td>KU</td><td>Post-election re-affirmation; disability &#x26; media lobby mobilisation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 4</td><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Digital seizure transparency (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>KU</td><td>Journalist protection coalition; press freedom framing</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>HD01TU21</strong></td><td>Statlig e-legitimation</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>TU</td><td>BankID consortium lobbying (€200M+ revenue at risk); eIDAS2 deadline</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>HD01MJU21</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen — agricultural climate audit</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>MJU</td><td>C-party rural defection risk; CAP eco-scheme compliance</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>HD01MJU19</strong></td><td>Waste legislation reform</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>MJU</td><td>Circular economy directive; municipality implementation capacity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> for the full 15-document matrix.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Proba
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Political outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 BASE — Government retained, FiU48 sunset respected, KU32/33 re-affirmed</td><td align="center"><strong>0.42</strong></td><td>Legacy package holds; minor ECHR amendment to SfU22</td></tr><tr><td>🔵 BULL (government) — S leadership change before election compresses opposition</td><td align="center"><strong>0.12</strong></td><td>FiU48 extended to year-end; KU32/33 uncontested</td></tr><tr><td>🔴 BEAR (government) — S-led minority, FiU48 reversed, KU32/33 partially lapse</td><td align="center"><strong>0.28</strong></td><td>SfU22 ECHR-amended; fuel tax restored Q1 2027</td></tr><tr><td>⚡ WILDCARD — Inconclusive election; technical prime minister</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td><td>All spring-2026 measures enter amendment-by-amendment renegotiation</td></tr><tr><td>🟣 TAIL — Migrationsöverdomstolen strikes SfU22 before election</td><td align="center"><strong>0.08</strong></td><td>Crisis reframes migration debate; Tidöavtal credibility damaged</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-four-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-four-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-four-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-four-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-four-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Clos
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Why it matters</th><th>Update signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R-FiU48-1</strong> Fossil-fuel subsidy reframe</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>Opposition climate-credibility attack; EU ETS2 narrative collision</td><td>First Novus climate-salience poll post-May 1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-SfU22-1</strong> ECHR challenge succeeds</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Protocol 4 Art. 2 + Art. 5 exposure; strikes Tidöavtal flagship</td><td>FARR filing at Migrationsöverdomstolen (expected ≤Aug 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-FiU48-2</strong> Structural precedent for fuel tax floor</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Climate Policy Framework §5 accountability trigger at Klimatlagen review</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet statement Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-TU21-BankID</strong> Banking lobby delays state e-ID past 2028 eIDAS2 deadline</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>EU Commission infringement; digital equity gap persists for 1.5M Swedes</td><td>Svenska Bankföreningen position Q2 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> for full ISO 31000 register.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Signal</th><th>What to prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Within 7 days</strong></td><td>Government communications on FiU48 sunset-clause framing</td><td>Campaign-messaging tracker</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Within 14 days</strong></td><td>L-party ECHR posture on SfU22 (backbench dissent watch)</td><td>Coalition-unity score update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>By 1 May 2026</strong></td><td>FiU48 implementation — fuel price ticker at Circle K / OKQ8</td><td>Rural-voter sentiment monitoring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>By 1 June 2026</strong></td><td>SfU22 implementation — first inhibition orders issued</td><td>FARR/Red Cross statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>By 30 Sept 2026</strong></td><td>FiU48 sunset-clause decision (pre-election)</td><td>Post-election coalition brief</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q3 2026</strong></td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen test case filing</td><td>ECHR scenario update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q3/Q4 2026</strong></td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet FiU48 accountability memo</td><td>Climate-credibility risk update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Post-election</strong></td><td>KU32/KU33 re-affirmation vote</td><td>Constitutional-continuity brief</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Re
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Sweden cuts fuel tax to EU minimum — the floor Brussels allows — 14 days before election"</td><td>FiU48 bill text + EU 2003/96/EC Annex I</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Constitutional amendments pre-commit the next Riksdag"</td><td>KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em> status + RF 8:14</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"First ECHR stress test of Tidöavtal flagship: migration inhibition vs Protocol 4 Art. 2"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §T1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"4.1B SEK supplementary budget delivered three weeks before campaign acceleration — fastest fiscal-political cycle since 2014"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a> §1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"State e-ID challenges BankID's de facto monopoly — €200M+ identity-verification market reallocation"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §5</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak or Oversimplified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak or Oversimplified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "FiU48 is a permanent tax cut" — sunset clause 30 Sept 2026; structural continuation requires separate legislation</li>
 <li>❌ "SfU22 deports more people" — it creates a no-status residual cohort, not new removal capacity</li>
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified">❌ Framings to
 <li>❌ "Agricultural audit MJU21 is hostile to farmers" — it audits CAP effectiveness, not farmers' practices</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deeper-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deeper-reading"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Cross-document synthesis + mermaid map</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — 5-dimension matrix across 15 documents</li>
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-28</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21<br>
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow<br>
@@ -527,13 +527,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-21 14:45 UTC<br>
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (SUMMARY/METADATA + FULL TEXT data)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-story">🎯 Top Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story">🎯 Top Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Government Fires Election-Year Populist Salvo: Fuel Tax Cut and Energy Price Relief</strong></p>
 <p>The single most consequential committee report approved on April 21, 2026 is FiU48 — an extraordinary supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes by 82 öre/liter for petrol and 319 SEK/m³ for diesel from May through September 2026, combined with a one-time electricity and gas price support package for Swedish households. The total budget impact of 4.1 billion SEK in 2026 — weakening state finances by that amount — represents a deliberate election-year gamble: the government cites the Middle East conflict and high January-February 2026 heating costs as justification for emergency measures, but the timing, five months before the general election, signals that economic relief for ordinary Swedes is now the government's primary electoral message. The measure reduces petrol and diesel taxes to the EU energy tax directive's minimum level — the floor allowed by Brussels — making Sweden temporarily one of the lowest-taxed fuel markets in the EU.</p>
 <p><strong>Second major story (ongoing)</strong>: Sweden's Migration Enforcement Shifts Away from Humanitarian Permits</p>
 <p>SfU22 — introducing "inhibition" (uppskjuten verkställighet) to replace temporary residence permits for aliens facing deportation obstacles — represents a fundamental shift in how Sweden treats individuals caught between deportation orders and temporary enforcement barriers. With the June 1, 2026 implementation date approaching, the measure will be one of the clearest migration policy tests before the 2026 election.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-rankings-by-significance">📊 Document Rankings by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-rankings-by-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-rankings-by-significance">📊 Document Rankings by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-rankings-by-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-rankings-by-significance">📊 Document Rankings by Signifi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Significance</th><th>Domain</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el/gasprisstöd</td><td><strong>10/10</strong></td><td>Fiscal/Energy policy</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition av verkställigheten</td><td>9/10</td><td>Migration enforcement</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier (grundlagsändring)</td><td>8/10</td><td>Constitutional/Media</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar vid husrannsakan (grundlagsändring)</td><td>7/10</td><td>Constitutional/Rule of law</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen</td><td>7/10</td><td>Environment/Circular economy</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>En statlig e-legitimation</td><td>7/10</td><td>Digital governance</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om klimatpolitiska ramverket</td><td>7/10</td><td>Climate policy</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>7/10</td><td>Agriculture/Climate</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>7/10</td><td>Housing/Property markets</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart</td><td>6/10</td><td>Property/Anti-crime</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>Permanent skattefrihet för laddel</td><td>6/10</td><td>Green taxation</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td>5/10</td><td>Constitutional/Budget</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Slopat krav på anmälan för föräldrapenning</td><td>5/10</td><td>Social insurance</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD01KU43</td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td><td>2/10</td><td>Parliamentary admin</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-committee-activity-overview">🏛️ Committee Activity Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-committee-activity-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-activity-overview">🏛️ Committee Activity Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-activity-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     subgraph "Committee Reports — April 2026"
     FiU["FiU: FISCAL EMERGENCY\n(HD01FiU48 — CRITICAL)\nFuel tax + energy relief 4.1B SEK"]
@@ -672,21 +672,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-committee-activity-overview">🏛️ Committee Activity Overview<
     style SkU fill:#888888,color:#fff
     style SfU2 fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-themes-this-cycle">🔑 Key Themes This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-themes-this-cycle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story">1. 🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Relief (HD01FiU48) — TOP STORY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-themes-this-cycle">🔑 Key Themes This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-themes-this-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story">1. 🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Relief (HD01FiU48) — TOP STORY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story"></a></h4>
 <p>The supplementary budget is the government's most significant economic intervention since the 2022 energy crisis support packages. Fuel tax reduction to EU minimum levels (petrol: 82 öre/liter cut; diesel: 319 SEK/m³ cut) across May-September 2026 will benefit every Swedish driver — approximately 5.7 million licensed drivers and 4.8 million registered vehicles. The el- och gasprisstöd (electricity and gas price support) reimburses January-February 2026 heating costs. Total cost: 4.1 billion SEK. The government's justification — Middle East conflict and high winter heating bills — is technically accurate but politically transparent: this is relief timed to coincide with the final campaign buildup period before September 14, 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22">2. 🔴 Migration Enforcement Tightening (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22">2. 🔴 Migration Enforcement Tightening (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22"></a></h4>
 <p>The inhibition reform closes the temporary-permit pathway while extending deportation enforcement machinery. This is the government's most direct operationalization of its Tidöavtal migration commitments. Risk: ECHR exposure; Opportunity: electoral reward from enforcement-focused voters.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33">3. 🟣 Dual Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU32, HD01KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33">3. 🟣 Dual Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU32, HD01KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33"></a></h4>
 <p>Two constitution-level changes adopted as "vilande" (pending) requiring re-affirmation after the September 2026 election. KU32 expands accessibility requirements applicable to press-freedom-protected media; KU33 restricts public access to digitally seized materials in criminal investigations. Both require the post-election Riksdag to pass identical wording — binding the next government to these changes regardless of who wins.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21">4. 🔵 Digital Infrastructure Modernization (HD01TU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21">4. 🔵 Digital Infrastructure Modernization (HD01TU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21"></a></h4>
 <p>The state e-ID proposal moves Sweden toward eIDAS2 compliance and challenges BankID's near-monopoly. Cross-party support likely; implementation timeline 2027-2028. Digital equity benefit for 15-20% of Swedes lacking BankID access.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21">5. 🟢 Agricultural &#x26; Climate Accountability (HD01MJU19, MJU20, MJU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21">5. 🟢 Agricultural &#x26; Climate Accountability (HD01MJU19, MJU20, MJU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21"></a></h4>
 <p>Three MJU-related reports this cycle: waste legislation reform (circular economy), Riksrevisionen audit of climate policy framework effectiveness, and agricultural emissions audit. Together these constitute the most comprehensive environmental accountability package of the 2025/26 session.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28">6. 🏠 Housing &#x26; Property Market Reforms (HD01CU27, CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28">6. 🏠 Housing &#x26; Property Market Reforms (HD01CU27, CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28"></a></h4>
 <p>Two civil law reforms: a national housing register for all bostadsrätter (condominiums) with improved mortgage transparency, and stricter identity requirements for property registration — targeting money laundering in the real estate sector. Both effective 2026-2027.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-aggregate-risk-assessment">⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-aggregate-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregate-risk-assessment">⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-aggregate-risk-assessment">⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk Area</th><th>Score</th><th>Key Driver</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal sustainability (FiU48)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>4.1B SEK budget weakening in election year</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR/Human Rights (SfU22)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Inhibition without residence creates rights vacuum</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional lock-in (KU32, KU33)</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Vilande decisions bind next government</td></tr><tr><td>EU Compliance (TU21, TU22, MJU19)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Multiple EU deadlines 2026-2027</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural Emissions</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>CAP eco-scheme underperformance</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional (KU42, KU43)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Routine administrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-aggregate-assessment">🗳️ Election 2026 Aggregate Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-aggregate-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-aggregate-assessment">🗳️ Election 2026 Aggregate Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-aggregate-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most electorally salient</strong>: HD01FiU48 (fuel/energy relief — direct voter pocket benefit)<br>
 <strong>Second tier</strong>: HD01SfU22 (migration enforcement — top-3 voter issue)<br>
 <strong>Constitutional stakes</strong>: HD01KU32, HD01KU33 (bind the next government — cross-party significance)<br>
@@ -737,8 +737,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-aggregate-assessment">🗳️ Election 2026 Aggrega
 <strong>Background risk</strong>: HD01MJU21 (rural voter sensitivity to agriculture conditions)<br>
 <strong>Coalition test</strong>: SD's influence visible across SfU22 and KU42 (defense budget areas)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-document-analysis">🔗 Cross-Document Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-document-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle">The Election-Year Economic Triangle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-document-analysis">🔗 Cross-Document Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-document-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle">The Election-Year Economic Triangle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle"></a></h4>
 <p>The FiU48 supplementary budget, the SfU22 migration enforcement reform, and the KU32/33 constitutional amendments form a deliberate electoral triangle:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>FiU48</strong>: "We put money in your pocket" — economic populism targeting centrist/right voters</li>
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle">The Election-Year Economic Trian
 <li><strong>KU32/KU33</strong>: "We reformed foundational laws" — governance legacy regardless of election result</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This pattern — economic relief + enforcement + constitutional legacy — reflects a government that expects to lose some ground in September 2026 but is positioning for a legacy and a competitive return.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-compliance-chain">EU Compliance Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-compliance-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-compliance-chain">EU Compliance Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-compliance-chain"></a></h4>
 <p>Four reports this cycle are directly EU-mandated:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>FiU48</strong>: EU energy tax directive minimum levels (fuel tax floor)</li>
@@ -755,13 +755,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-compliance-chain">EU Compliance Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>MJU19</strong>: EU circular economy directive</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Sweden faces simultaneous compliance pressure across four policy domains. The FiU48 fuel tax cut is paradoxically both an election relief measure AND an EU compliance correction — bringing Sweden to directive minimum levels.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion">Enforcement Architecture Expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion">Enforcement Architecture Expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion"></a></h4>
 <p>Both <strong>SfU22</strong> (migration inhibition) and <strong>TU22</strong> (tachograph) expand state enforcement capacity through surveillance mechanisms (geographic restrictions/mandatory check-ins; digital tachograph monitoring). Together with <strong>TU19</strong> (municipal port security in NATO context) and <strong>CU27</strong> (property registration identity verification), this suggests a broad legislative trend toward enforcement infrastructure buildup across migration, transport, and property domains.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports | <strong>Method</strong>: 5-dimension scoring<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:45 UTC — includes HD01FiU48 (new top story, extra ändringsbudget 2026)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Electoral</th><th>Constitutional</th><th>EU Impact</th><th>Immediacy</th><th>Controversy</th><th>TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td><strong>22/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td><strong>22/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>19/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>16/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>14/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td><strong>13/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>13/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td><strong>13/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td><strong>9/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU22</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td><strong>12/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6/25</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-dimensions">Scoring Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-dimensions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-dimensions">Scoring Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-dimensions"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Electoral</strong>: Impact on 2026 election voter mobilization (1=marginal, 5=top issue)</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional</strong>: Affects fundamental rights, Riksdag powers, or rule of law (1=admin, 5=constitutional)</li>
@@ -920,110 +920,110 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-dimensions">Scoring Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Immediacy</strong>: Implementation timeline relative to election (1=long-term, 5=pre-election)</li>
 <li><strong>Controversy</strong>: Opposition party resistance strength (1=consensus, 5=fierce opposition)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-story-recommendation">Top Story Recommendation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-recommendation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story-recommendation">Top Story Recommendation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-recommendation"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Co-headline</strong>: HD01FiU48 (22/25 — Extra ändringsbudget: fuel tax cut + energy price relief, 4.1B SEK, election-year relief package) and HD01SfU22 (22/25 — Migration enforcement inhibition reform)</p>
 <p><strong>FiU48 tie-break</strong>: Although both FiU48 and SfU22 score 22/25, FiU48 is the <strong>top story</strong> as it was tabled TODAY (April 21, 2026) and its direct financial impact affects the entire Swedish population — making it more immediately newsworthy.</p>
 <p><strong>Strong secondaries</strong>: HD01KU32 (19/25 — Constitutional accessibility amendment, vilande) and HD01KU33 (17/25 — Constitutional search &#x26; seizure amendment, vilande)</p>
 <p><strong>Third tier</strong>: HD01TU21 (17/25 — State e-ID), HD01MJU21 (17/25 — Agriculture climate audit), HD01MJU19 (17/25 — Waste legislation reform)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Framework</strong>: 8-Group Political Intelligence Model | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:52 UTC — HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget) added as primary document for all 8 groups</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Primary focus on <strong>HD01FiU48</strong> (fuel tax cut + energy price relief, 4.1B SEK) as the most broadly impactful document, <strong>HD01SfU22</strong> (migration enforcement) for political significance, with secondary perspectives on KU32/KU33 (constitutional amendments), TU21 (e-ID), and MJU21 (agriculture climate).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HD01SfU22</strong>: Swedish public opinion on migration enforcement remains strongly divided. SIFO polling (Jan 2026) shows 54% support tighter enforcement including stricter return procedures; 31% prioritize humanitarian protection. Working-class voters — SD's strongest demographic — overwhelmingly support deterrence measures. Elderly and welfare-dependent communities track TU21 (e-ID accessibility) as a practical concern.</p>
 <p><strong>HD01TU21</strong>: Digital equity resonates across demographic lines. 1.5 million Swedish adults lack BankID access (primarily elderly, recent immigrants, unbanked). State e-ID addresses a genuine inclusion gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Key citizen concerns</strong>: Rule of law + cost efficiency (SfU22), digital inclusion (TU21), climate fairness without harming food prices (MJU21).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l">2. Government Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l">2. Government Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong>: Champions SfU22 as essential enforcement tool; supports TU21 as digital modernization; endorses MJU21 recommendations for efficiency-first agricultural reform.</p>
 <p><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong>: Principal driver of migration tightening; SfU22 is a core Tidöavtal deliverable. Claims credit for eliminating "residence permit loophole." Skeptical of MJU21 if it threatens food security.</p>
 <p><strong>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</strong>: Supportive of enforcement; adds "human dignity" framing. Supports agricultural subsidy conditionality as stewardship.</p>
 <p><strong>Liberalerna (L)</strong>: Monitors ECHR compliance on SfU22; strongly supports TU21 (digital rights, eIDAS2). Cautious on MJU21 without implementation safeguards.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition unity score</strong>: HIGH on SfU22; HIGH on TU21; MEDIUM on MJU21 (C-party tension risk).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>: Opposes SfU22's elimination of temporary permits; argues it creates "stateless limbo." Supports TU21 in principle but demands privacy safeguards. Cautiously supports MJU21 recommendations.</p>
 <p><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>: Strongly opposes SfU22; labels it "cruel and legally dubious." Demands withdrawal of geographic restriction powers. Strong supporter of MJU21 binding emission conditions.</p>
 <p><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>: Opposes SfU22; prioritizes MJU21 as part of climate transition; wants stronger agricultural emission targets than government proposes.</p>
 <p><strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong>: Splits from coalition trend: opposed to any binding conditions on agricultural subsidies (rural voter base); cautiously supportive of TU21; may abstain on MJU21 key votes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: Transport and construction sectors (reliant on asylum labor) face labor supply uncertainty. Insurance industry monitors inhibited persons' legal status for contract validity.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Banking sector (SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Nordea) opposes state e-ID as threat to BankID revenue model. Fintech and digital services sector sees opportunity. E-commerce sector supports standardized identity verification.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) strongly opposes binding agricultural emission conditions. Food processors (Arla, HKScan) neutral but monitor input cost implications. Biogas and precision agriculture firms see opportunity.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: FARR (Flyktinggruppernas Riksråd), Red Cross, and Amnesty International will challenge inhibition orders through legal aid and court challenges. Public advocacy campaigns expected.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Pensionärsorganisationer (PRO, SPF) strongly supportive of accessibility. Funktionsrätt Sverige supports digital inclusion for disabled persons.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF, Swedish Society for Nature Conservation strongly supportive of binding agricultural climate conditions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: EU Returns Directive (2008/115/EC) permits enforcement delay mechanisms; inhibition must comply. European Commission migration compliance reviews monitor Sweden's returns performance.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: EU eIDAS2 Regulation (EU 910/2014 amended) creates compliance obligation for state digital identity. European Parliament monitors member state implementation timelines.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: EU Commission's CAP monitoring; Sweden must demonstrate eco-scheme effectiveness in Strategic Plan annual reports.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: Migration Court of Appeal (Migrationsöverdomstolen) will face novel questions on geographic restriction proportionality and ECHR Article 5 (liberty). Constitutional review (KU) should assess compatibility with basic freedoms.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Data protection authorities (IMY) will scrutinize state e-ID registry design for GDPR compliance.</p>
 <p><strong>KU42</strong>: KU itself reviews constitutionality of expenditure area design.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: Aftonbladet, Expressen (left-leaning tabloids) will run personal stories of affected families; Svenska Dagbladet, Dagens Nyheter (quality press) will cover legal arguments. SVT will seek balanced reporting. Risk of "Sweden's cruel immigration system" international narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Tech media (Breakit, Computer Sweden) positive. General press frames as digital equity story.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: Agricultural publications (Land, ATL) monitoring; environmental media (Miljöaktuellt) supportive of accountability.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget: Supplementary Analysis Across 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-fiu48">1. Citizens (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget: Supplementary Analysis Across 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-fiu48">1. Citizens (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p>All 5.7 million Swedish licensed drivers benefit from the 82 öre/liter petrol reduction. Rural and suburban households — disproportionately car-dependent — gain the most. Elderly households and those with gas heating benefit from el- och gasprisstöd. Transit users and urban apartment renters see minimal direct benefit. <strong>Net verdict</strong>: High positive reception across a broad voter base, though climate-conscious citizens (primarily MP/V voters) may view the measure negatively.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48">2. Government Coalition (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48">2. Government Coalition (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>M (Moderaterna)</strong>: Embraces fiscal conservatism caveat — supports as temporary, emergency measure; highlights EU compliance angle (directive minimum)
 <strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong>: Champions as "government that delivers for ordinary Swedes" — rural drivers are core SD demographic<br>
 <strong>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</strong>: Frames as family protection — heating costs and commuter costs both benefit family households<br>
 <strong>L (Liberalerna)</strong>: Most cautious — monitors carbon pricing implications; may emphasize "temporary" framing<br>
 <strong>Coalition unity</strong>: VERY HIGH on FiU48 — one of strongest cross-party coalition moments since 2022 energy crisis</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48">3. Opposition Bloc (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48">3. Opposition Bloc (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong>: Split — working-class drivers benefit, but S climate credibility threatened by supporting fossil fuel price cuts. Expected: accept without enthusiasm, criticize "election-year populism"<br>
 <strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong>: Will oppose — frames as fossil fuel subsidy; demands that savings be redirected to public transport<br>
 <strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong>: Will strongly oppose — EU minimum fossil fuel tax is antithema to climate policy<br>
 <strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong>: Will welcome privately (rural voter base heavily car-dependent) but may maintain public silence on climate grounds<br>
 <strong>Opposition fragmentation</strong>: FiU48 splits the opposition, with V/MP opposing and C likely neutral/positive</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48">4. Business/Industry (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48">4. Business/Industry (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Transport sector (haulage, logistics)</strong>: Significant direct savings on diesel — 319 SEK/m³ cut reduces operating costs for every Swedish haulage company. Estimates: 1.5-2% reduction in per-km fuel costs for heavy goods vehicles<br>
 <strong>Agriculture (LRF)</strong>: Combined benefit from FiU48 (fuel costs) and SkU23 (EV charging) — agriculture uses both diesel machinery and increasingly electric alternatives<br>
 <strong>Retail fuel (Circle K, Preem, ST1, OKQ8)</strong>: Volume increase expected as price elasticity triggers additional fill-up frequency<br>
 <strong>EV sector</strong>: Paradoxically disadvantaged — ICE vehicles made relatively more competitive vs. electric<br>
 <strong>Energy providers</strong>: El- och gasprisstöd creates one-time balance sheet item; minimal operational impact</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-fiu48">5. Civil Society (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-fiu48">5. Civil Society (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF, Greenpeace</strong>: Will run "fossil fuel subsidy" campaign framing; pressure government on climate targets<br>
 <strong>Konsumentverket</strong>: Monitors whether petrol stations pass through full savings (price transparency obligation)<br>
 <strong>Consumer organizations</strong>: Support — cost-of-living relief visible and immediate<br>
 <strong>Disability organizations</strong>: Energy support benefits households relying on electric equipment (mobility aids, medical devices)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48">6. International/EU (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48">6. International/EU (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>European Commission</strong>: Will note Sweden temporarily reducing fossil fuel taxes toward directive minimum — no formal infringement since Sweden remains at or above ETD floor. However, Commission Energy Transition DG may express concern about signal<br>
 <strong>Nordic partners (DK, NO, FI)</strong>: Norway exempt (non-EU). Denmark and Finland have higher fuel taxes — no competitive harmonization pressure<br>
 <strong>IPCC/Climate bodies</strong>: Sweden reducing its carbon price signal contradicts Paris Agreement ambition language<br>
 <strong>NATO partners</strong>: No direct implications for defense posture</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Riksdagen (legislative review)</strong>: FiU mechanism legally uncontroversial; Finance Committee finds "special reasons" requirement met<br>
 <strong>Swedish courts</strong>: No constitutional challenge expected — extraordinary budget is standard legislative tool<br>
 <strong>Skattemyndigheten (Tax Authority)</strong>: Administrative implementation straightforward — existing systems handle tax rate changes<br>
 <strong>EU Court of Justice</strong>: Compliance with Energy Taxation Directive minimum levels — no violation</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48">8. Media/Public Opinion (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48">8. Media/Public Opinion (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Aftonbladet, Expressen</strong>: Will run prominent "How much you save" price comparison graphics — positive coverage for government<br>
 <strong>Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet</strong>: "Election-year populism" analytical angle; expert quotes on climate consequences<br>
 <strong>SVT/SR</strong>: Balanced — consumer benefit story + climate policy concern<br>
 <strong>Miljöaktuellt, ETC</strong>: Strong critical coverage on carbon pricing regression<br>
 <strong>International media (FT, Politico Europe)</strong>: "Sweden cuts fuel taxes before election" story fits European right-populism narrative</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Bayesian scenario tree per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> §Scenario Tree Analysis.
 <strong>Assessment window</strong>: 2026-04-21 → 2027-04-21 (12 months).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-space-definition">🎯 Scenario-Space Definition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-space-definition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-space-definition">🎯 Scenario-Space Definition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-space-definition"></a></h3>
 <p>Five scenarios span the most plausible futures for the tri-pillar package (FiU48, SfU22, KU32/33). Each scenario is conditioned on the 14 September 2026 election and on ECHR/EU-court litigation outcomes through Q2 2027.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     Root["🌲 Scenario Root&#x3C;br/>2026-04-21 committee package adopted"]
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-space-definition">🎯 Scenario-Space Definition<a class=""
     style TAIL fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFF
     style WILD fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probability-matrix">📊 Scenario Probability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probability-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-matrix">📊 Scenario Probability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1088,8 +1088,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probability-matrix">📊 Scenario Probability Matrix<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Prior P</th><th align="center">Conditional P(Elec outcome)</th><th align="center">Posterior P</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 <strong>BASE</strong> — Coalition retained; FiU48 sunsets as planned; KU32/33 re-affirmed; SfU22 ECHR amendment minor</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">0.42 × 0.82 (subpath held) + 0.12 (BULL absorbed back)</td><td align="center"><strong>0.42</strong></td></tr><tr><td>🔵 <strong>BULL</strong> — Coalition retained + FiU48 extended to year-end + KU32/33 uncontested</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">0.42 × 0.28</td><td align="center"><strong>0.12</strong></td></tr><tr><td>🔴 <strong>BEAR</strong> — S-led minority; FiU48 reversed Q1 2027; KU33 partially lapses; SfU22 ECHR-amended</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">Direct</td><td align="center"><strong>0.28</strong></td></tr><tr><td>🟣 <strong>TAIL</strong> — S+V+MP+C majority + Migrationsöverdomstolen strikes SfU22 before election</td><td align="center">0.05</td><td align="center">0.10 × 0.80</td><td align="center"><strong>0.08</strong></td></tr><tr><td>⚡ <strong>WILDCARD</strong> — Technical PM government; all measures renegotiated</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">Direct</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO April 2026 polling averages; ECtHR case-law base rates; historical coalition-formation outcomes (1976–2022).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">🎭 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base-p042--legacy-package-holds">🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Package Holds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base-p042--legacy-package-holds"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">🎭 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base-p042--legacy-package-holds">🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Package Holds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-p042--legacy-package-holds"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: Coalition retained with narrower margin (171–178 seats); FiU48 sunsets 30 Sept 2026 as scheduled; post-election Riksdag re-affirms KU32 and KU33 in Q4 2026 / Q1 2027; SfU22 amended minor-procedurally to address Migrationsöverdomstolen preliminary ruling (e.g. narrower geographic-restriction radius).</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes 12 months out</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base-p042--legacy-package-holds">🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Packa
 <li>Opposition narrative: "They bought your votes and walked"</li>
 <li>Coalition narrative: "We delivered relief + reform + legacy"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bull-p012--electoral-tailwind">🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tailwind<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull-p012--electoral-tailwind"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull-p012--electoral-tailwind">🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tailwind<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull-p012--electoral-tailwind"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: Coalition retained + gains. FiU48 extended to 31 Dec 2026 then gradually unwound to March 2027. Constitutional package passes with increased margin.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull-p012--electoral-tailwind">🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tail
 <li>ECHR challenge filed but government uses electoral mandate to resist</li>
 <li>SD + M consolidate enforcement credibility narrative</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bear-p028--partial-reversal">🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear-p028--partial-reversal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear-p028--partial-reversal">🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear-p028--partial-reversal"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: S-led minority government forms (S+V informal support + MP confidence-and-supply). Coalition unable to form alternative majority.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear-p028--partial-reversal">🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal
 <li>KU33: <strong>lapses</strong> — S-led government does not re-propose; 3-year cooling-off period begins</li>
 <li>Tidöavtal effectively defunct post-2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike">🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full Reversal + ECHR Strike<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike">🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full Reversal + ECHR Strike<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: S+V+MP+C majority forms. Migrationsöverdomstolen issues preliminary ruling striking SfU22 §4 before new government takes office.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike">🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full R
 <li>Narrative victory: "Courts protected constitutional rights that parliament tried to abolish"</li>
 <li>ECtHR Strasbourg filing may be withdrawn as moot</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election">⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inconclusive Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election">⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inconclusive Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: 4–6 weeks of talks produce a technical-PM government (Schlüter/Johansson-style cross-bloc figure). No working majority.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election">⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inco
 <li>High political volatility; monthly updating required</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario">📈 Decision-Relevant Variables for Each Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario">📈 Decision-Relevant Variables for Each Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario">📈 Decision-Relevan
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Variable</th><th align="center">BASE</th><th align="center">BULL</th><th align="center">BEAR</th><th align="center">TAIL</th><th align="center">WILDCARD</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 total cost (SEK bn)</td><td align="center">4.1</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center">2.8 (partial)</td><td align="center">2.0</td><td align="center">5.5</td></tr><tr><td>Extended CPI impact (pp)</td><td align="center">-0.3</td><td align="center">-0.6</td><td align="center">-0.1</td><td align="center">+0.1 (rebound)</td><td align="center">-0.3</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 inhibited persons (n, 12 mo)</td><td align="center">900–1,200</td><td align="center">900–1,200</td><td align="center">&#x3C;200</td><td align="center">0 (struck)</td><td align="center">400–700</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 re-affirm probability</td><td align="center">0.85</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.45</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 extension probability</td><td align="center">0.05</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center">0.00</td><td align="center">0.00</td><td align="center">0.30</td></tr><tr><td>Climate framework credibility delta</td><td align="center">-1 (minor)</td><td align="center">-3 (major)</td><td align="center">+1 (repair)</td><td align="center">+2 (strong repair)</td><td align="center">-1</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition unity index post-election</td><td align="center">N/A</td><td align="center">0.99</td><td align="center">0.85</td><td align="center">0.82</td><td align="center">0.70</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-protocol">🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-protocol"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-protocol">🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-protocol"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code>, scenario probabilities must be updated monthly or when any of these evidence events occur:</p>
 
 
@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-protocol">🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Event</th><th>Update direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Novus/Sifo monthly shift ≥3 pp</td><td>Adjust Elec conditional P</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on SfU22</td><td>Adjust TAIL conditional P</td></tr><tr><td>First Migrationsöverdomstolen filing</td><td>+0.04 to TAIL, -0.02 each to BASE/BULL</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet memo Q3 2026</td><td>+0.03 to BEAR</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 extension announcement</td><td>+0.15 to BULL, -0.10 to BASE</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 amendment at committee stage</td><td>+0.03 to BASE (lower ECHR exposure)</td></tr><tr><td>Svenska Bankföreningen lobbying success vs TU21</td><td>Not scenario-relevant (horizon mismatch)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--monitoring-triggers">🧭 Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--monitoring-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">🧭 Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--monitoring-triggers">🧭 Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Novus Sept 2026 poll shows coalition &#x3C;165 seats equivalent</td><td>P(BASE)&#x3C;0.30</td><td>Re-weight BEAR up</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet flags SfU22 as ECHR-problematic</td><td>P(TAIL) >0.12</td><td>Early-warning to newsroom</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 unwind delay announced</td><td>P(BULL) >0.25</td><td>Narrative update</td></tr><tr><td>C-party opens negotiations with S before election</td><td>P(TAIL) >0.15</td><td>Coalition-math rerun</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Art. 39 interim measure in SfU22 case</td><td>P(TAIL) >0.25</td><td>Priority advisory to subscribers</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--worst-case--black-swan-considerations">📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--worst-case--black-swan-considerations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-worst-case--black-swan-considerations">📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-worst-case--black-swan-considerations"></a></h3>
 <p>Beyond the five scenarios, three low-probability high-impact events worth monitoring:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Snap re-election</strong> (P=0.03) — If government falls before 14 Sept 2026 (unlikely given 1-seat majority but possible if L backbench fractures on SfU22). Collapses scenario tree; new root needed.</li>
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--worst-case--black-swan-considerations">📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan
 <li><strong>Major fiscal surprise</strong> (e.g. CPI spike, energy shock) (P=0.12) — Could structurally convert FiU48 sunset into permanent measure regardless of election outcome.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-methodology-linkage">🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-methodology-linkage">🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong> <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — BEAR/TAIL scenarios materialise top-tier risks R-SfU22-1 + R-FiU48-1</li>
 <li><strong>Threat</strong> <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> — TAIL scenario = realised Threat T1 (SfU22 ECHR strike)</li>
@@ -1312,10 +1312,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-methodology-linkage">🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class=""
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟨 MEDIUM. Probabilities are point estimates with ±0.05 uncertainty bands. Primary uncertainty is the September 2026 election outcome (no reliable forecast exists with &#x3C;60% confidence at T-5 months).</p>
 <p><strong>Next Bayesian update</strong>: 2026-05-21 (or triggered by monitor events above).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Framework</strong>: ISO 31000 + ISMS | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:52 UTC — Expanded to 14 documents, FiU48 fiscal risks added</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Committee Reports 2026-04-21 (14 documents)
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -1333,8 +1333,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     MJU21-Rural: [0.75, 0.55]
     TU22-CrossBorder: [0.80, 0.55]
     KU42-Oversight: [0.30, 0.70]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-risks">Priority Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--critical-li--15">🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--critical-li--15"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks">Priority Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-critical-li--15">🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-li--15"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1386,7 +1386,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--critical-li--15">🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th><th>Owner</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-FiU48-1</td><td>Opposition reframes fuel tax cut as "fossil fuel subsidy" — climate credibility damage</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government comms</td><td>May-Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R-FiU48-2</td><td>Carbon pricing precedent — fuel tax cut becomes structural; climate targets undermined</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>Oct 2026 +</td></tr><tr><td>R-SfU22-1</td><td>ECHR challenge to inhibition geographic restrictions</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R-SfU22-2</td><td>Political weaponization of "stateless limbo" narrative</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government comms</td><td>Election 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--high-li-8-14">🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--high-li-8-14"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-high-li-8-14">🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-li-8-14"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--high-li-8-14">🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-TU21-1</td><td>BankID lobby delays state e-ID rollout</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>R-FiU48-3</td><td>Budget impact underestimated — 4.1B SEK in election year weakens fiscal standing</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-MJU21-1</td><td>C-party demands weakened agriculture conditions</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-TU22-1</td><td>Cross-border tachograph enforcement gap</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-MJU21-2</td><td>EU CAP compliance failure</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU32-1</td><td>Post-election Riksdag fails to re-affirm KU32 (accessibility constitutional amendment)</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU33-1</td><td>Press freedom critics mobilize against KU33 (digital seizure ruling)</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--moderate-li--7">🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--moderate-li--7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-moderate-li--7">🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-moderate-li--7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--moderate-li--7">🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-KU42-1</td><td>UO change reduces defense spending oversight</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU28-1</td><td>Housing register implementation delay</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>R-SkU23-1</td><td>EV charging exemption creates unequal subsidy landscape</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigation-priority">Mitigation Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-priority"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigation-priority">Mitigation Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-priority"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>FiU48</strong>: Sunset clause communication — government must proactively frame September 30, 2026 end date to prevent "permanent" expectation from forming</li>
 <li><strong>SfU22</strong>: Legal aid access provisions + geographic restriction proportionality review</li>
@@ -1493,10 +1493,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitigation-priority">Mitigation Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>MJU21</strong>: Assign lead agency (Jordbruksverket) with binding targets</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports | <strong>Scope</strong>: All 14 committee reports<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:50 UTC — Expanded to 14 documents including HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment">Overall Legislative Batch Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment">Overall Legislative Batch Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "STRENGTHS"
     S1["Coalition fiscal delivery\n(FiU48 — cost-of-living relief 4.1B SEK)"]
@@ -1540,8 +1540,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment">Overall Legislative Batch Asses
     style T2 fill:#cc8844,color:#fff
     style T3 fill:#cc8844,color:#fff
     style T4 fill:#cc8844,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-dimension-details">Dimension Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-details"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-dimension-details">Dimension Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-details"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal relief to voters</td><td>Fuel tax cut 82 öre/liter + el/gas support; 5.7M drivers benefit</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition enforcement delivery</td><td>SfU22 implements Tidöavtal migration commitment</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU compliance leadership</td><td>TU21 (eIDAS2), MJU19 (waste directive), FiU48 (ETD minimum)</td><td>HD01TU21, HD01MJU19, HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Digital equity advance</td><td>1.5M Swedes without BankID access gain identity option</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market transparency</td><td>National bostadsrätts register improves mortgage clarity; anti-money-laundering property ID rules</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional legacy</td><td>KU32/KU33 vilande bind next government to accessibility and seizure rules</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Circular economy progress</td><td>Waste legislation clarifies responsibility, enables circular economy</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fossil fuel price signal regression</td><td>Fuel tax to EU minimum undercuts Sweden's carbon leadership</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR exposure</td><td>Geographic restriction + mandatory check-in = liberty risk</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Budgetary fragility</td><td>-4.1B SEK in election year; if extended = structural weakness</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural oversight fragmentation</td><td>Riksrevisionen identified dual-agency responsibility gap</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Technical displacement challenge</td><td>BankID monopoly entrenched; state e-ID faces adoption battle</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Climate audit non-response</td><td>MJU20 climate framework audit shows policy fragmentation</td><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Economic narrative dominance</td><td>FiU48 gives government "on your side" economic story</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Election mandate activation</td><td>SfU22 rewards SD/M base; demonstrates delivery</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic e-ID leadership</td><td>Sweden can model state e-ID for Denmark, Norway, Finland</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market reform credit</td><td>Two CU reforms improve consumer protection</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental compliance</td><td>MJU19 positions Sweden as circular economy leader</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>L×I</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Opposition reframes FiU48 as fossil fuel subsidy</td><td>16</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Carbon price precedent locks in lower fossil fuel taxes</td><td>15</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR challenge to SfU22 geographic restrictions</td><td>15</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Political "cruel Sweden" narrative (SfU22)</td><td>16</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Banking lobby delays TU21 implementation</td><td>16</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C-party defection on MJU21 conditions</td><td>12</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU32/KU33 campaign mobilization against constitutional amendments</td><td>10</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Confidence:</strong> 🟩 HIGH — Based on FULL-TEXT for HD01FiU48, HD01SfU22, HD01KU32, HD01KU33; SUMMARY for remaining 10 documents.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "🏷️ Political Threat Taxonomy — 2026-04-21"
         NI["🎭 Narrative Integrity"]
@@ -1809,7 +1809,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1
     style TR1 fill:#FF9800,color:#000
     style DP1 fill:#FF9800,color:#000
     style PB1 fill:#FF9800,color:#000</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-scores-05">Dimension Scores (0–5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-scores-05"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-scores-05">Dimension Scores (0–5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-scores-05"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1860,7 +1860,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-scores-05">Dimension Scores (0–5)<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Primary evidence</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🎭 <strong>Narrative Integrity</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>FiU48 pre-election framing as "cost-of-living relief" vs analyst reading as "pre-election fiscal populism"</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>📝 <strong>Legislative Integrity</strong></td><td align="center">4/5</td><td>SfU22 creates no-status cohort with geographic restrictions — contra German <em>Duldung</em> ECtHR precedent, Danish <em>udrejsecenter</em> (Akhtar v. Denmark 2023)</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>🚫 <strong>Accountability</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>FiU48 enacted without Klimatpolitiska rådet ex-ante assessment; FiU48 cuts precede MJU20 audit conclusions</td><td>→ steady</td></tr><tr><td>🔇 <strong>Transparency</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>KU33 <em>restricts</em> transparency — digitally seized materials (e.g., mirror-imaged hard drives from police searches) no longer automatically constitute <em>allmänna handlingar</em> under TF. Narrows public-records access; targets a prior ambiguity exploited in high-profile investigations.</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>⛔ <strong>Democratic Process</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>Dual <em>vilande</em> grundlagsändringar pre-commit post-election Riksdag under RF 8:14</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>👑 <strong>Power Balance</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>1-seat coalition majority (176/349) advances generational changes (grundlag + SfU22 structural)</td><td>→ steady</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate</strong>: 19/30 = <strong>HIGH</strong> threat level. The principal pressure points are <strong>legislative integrity</strong> (SfU22 ECHR exposure), <strong>democratic process</strong> (<em>vilande</em> lock-in), and <strong>transparency</strong> (KU33 narrows public-records access).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat "SfU22 struck down by court"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat "SfU22 struck down by court"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court"></a></h3>
 <p>The <code>political-threat-framework.md</code> mandates Attack Trees for the top threat.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: SfU22 struck down&#x3C;br/>(OR — any path suffices)"]
@@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court">🌳 S
     style A fill:#FF9800,color:#FFF
     style B fill:#FF9800,color:#FFF
     style A1 fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol">Leaf-Node Attributes (per framework §Attack Tree Construction Protocol)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol">Leaf-Node Attributes (per framework §Attack Tree Construction Protocol)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol"
 <p><strong>Cheapest attack path</strong>: A1 (Protocol 4 Art. 2) — high feasibility, high detectability, moderate cost.
 <strong>Early-warning MCP signal</strong>: FARR press release on first inhibition order issued (~June 2026) + <code>search_dokument</code> for Migrationsöverdomstolen preliminary ruling docket.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression">⛓️ Section 3: Political Kill Chain — SfU22 ECHR Challenge Progression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression">⛓️ Section 3: Political Kill Chain — SfU22 ECHR Challenge Progression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     R["1️⃣ Reconnaissance&#x3C;br/>FARR monitors HD01SfU22&#x3C;br/>committee drafts (March 2026)"]
     W["2️⃣ Weaponisation&#x3C;br/>Coalition building: FARR + Red Cross + UNHCR&#x3C;br/>(April 2026, in progress)"]
@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression"
     style D fill:#FF9800,color:#FFF
     style I fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFF
     style Ach fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment">Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment">Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment">Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Current status</th><th>Disruption opportunity (for government)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>✅ Completed — FARR tracking</td><td>Negligible — public procedure</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>🟠 In progress</td><td><strong>Window</strong>: amend geographic-restriction proportionality before 1 June implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>🔲 Pending (awaits implementation)</td><td>Legal aid access provisions + individual-case proportionality review</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>🔲 Future</td><td>Proactive government transparency on enforcement numbers</td></tr><tr><td>Installation</td><td>🔲 Expected ≤Aug 2026</td><td>Structurally unavoidable once Stage 4 reached</td></tr><tr><td>Command &#x26; Control</td><td>🔲 Future</td><td>Negligible</td></tr><tr><td>Actions on Objective</td><td>🔲 Q4 2026–2027</td><td>Primary defence: amendment at coalition stage</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — SfU22 Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — SfU22 Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     A["👤 ADVERSARY&#x3C;br/>FARR + Red Cross + UNHCR&#x3C;br/>(coordinated legal challenge)"]
     V["🎯 VICTIM&#x3C;br/>Government enforcement credibility&#x3C;br/>Tidöavtal flagship reform"]
@@ -2008,7 +2008,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor">💎 Section 4:
 <strong>Capability</strong>: Established ECtHR litigation channels; 12+ adverse rulings against German <em>Duldung</em> regime as precedent bank; Akhtar v. Denmark (2023) on concentrated-residence directly analogous.
 <strong>Infrastructure</strong>: Migrationsöverdomstolen admissibility doctrine requires exhausted remedies; ECtHR Section filing window opens after that. INGO amicus pathways active.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor ICO Profile — FARR-led Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor ICO Profile — FARR-led Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2033,31 +2033,31 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition">👤 Section
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Intent</strong></td><td>HIGH — Public commitments to challenge Tidöavtal migration measures; 2023–2025 filing pattern shows systematic litigation strategy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Capability</strong></td><td>HIGH — In-house legal team; UNHCR amicus precedent; established access to Migrationsöverdomstolen and ECtHR</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong></td><td>HIGH — 1 June 2026 implementation creates immediate fact-pattern; geographic-restriction §4 is textually similar to Danish <em>udrejsecenter</em> struck in Akhtar v. Denmark</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>ICO composite</strong>: <strong>HIGH × HIGH × HIGH = HIGH</strong>. The challenge is not speculative; it is an expected feature of SfU22's implementation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6-secondary-threats">🎯 Section 6: Secondary Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6-secondary-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3">T2 — FiU48 Climate-Framework Accountability Bypass (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6-secondary-threats">🎯 Section 6: Secondary Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6-secondary-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3">T2 — FiU48 Climate-Framework Accountability Bypass (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Accountability + Narrative Integrity.
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Klimatlagen (2017:720) §5 mandates climate-impact assessment of fiscal measures with emission significance. FiU48 was expedited as emergency supplementary budget, compressing that review. Klimatpolitiska rådet's Q3 2026 memo is expected to flag the bypass.
 <strong>Disruption</strong>: Government proactively publishes retrospective climate-impact note before Q3 2026.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01FiU48 motivering §3 (emergency justification); Skr. 2025/26:95 (MJU20 Riksrevisionen audit of Climate Policy Framework).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3">T3 — Dual <em>Vilande</em> Post-Election Failure (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3">T3 — Dual <em>Vilande</em> Post-Election Failure (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Democratic Process.
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: RF 8:14 <em>vilande</em> mechanism requires identical wording in next Riksdag. KU33 (digital-seizure <em>access restriction</em> via TF-amendment) has ≤50% re-affirmation probability in BEAR scenarios (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math) — an S-led government could view the restriction as an undue narrowing of public-records access and decline to re-propose. Failure to re-affirm triggers three-year waiting period before re-proposal.
 <strong>Disruption</strong>: None during this parliament; probability depends on 14 Sept election outcome.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01KU32, HD01KU33 <em>vilande</em> status confirmed in betänkandetexts.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23">T4 — Banking Sector Lobbying vs TU21 (Severity 2–3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23">T4 — Banking Sector Lobbying vs TU21 (Severity 2–3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Power Balance + Legislative Integrity.
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Svenska Bankföreningen + BankID consortium have demonstrated 2018–2024 pattern of delaying legislation via regulatory capture of utredning references. eIDAS2 deadline 2026 narrows the window.
 <strong>Disruption</strong>: Hard legislative deadline anchored to eIDAS2; Commission infringement risk pressures compliance.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01TU21 motivering; Svenska Bankföreningen remissvar on SOU 2024:XX.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7-cross-methodology-linkage">🔁 Section 7: Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7-cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7-cross-methodology-linkage">🔁 Section 7: Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7-cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Threat T1 (SfU22 ECHR)</strong> → Risk <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R-SfU22-1 (L=3, I=5, Score=15) + SWOT <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> W2 "ECHR exposure" + Stakeholder <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §3 opposition framing.</li>
 <li><strong>Threat T2 (FiU48 accountability)</strong> → Risk R-FiU48-1 (L=4, I=4, Score=16) + SWOT W1 "fiscal precedent stickiness" + Election lens <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md"><code>election-2026-implications.md</code></a> §Tier 1.</li>
 <li><strong>Threat T3 (<em>vilande</em> failure)</strong> → Coalition math <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math + Scenario tree <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> BEAR branch.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators">📡 Section 8: Forward MCP-Detectable Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators">📡 Section 8: Forward MCP-Detectable Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators">📡 Section 8: Forward
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>MCP tool</th><th>Expected window</th><th>Meaning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>First FARR press release re SfU22 implementation</td><td>— (external) + <code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td><td>≤1 week of 1 June 2026</td><td>Kill Chain stage 3 (Delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen docket entry</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (type=dom)</td><td>≤Aug 2026</td><td>Kill Chain stage 5 (Installation)</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet FiU48 memo</td><td><code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td><td>Q3 2026</td><td>T2 realisation</td></tr><tr><td>L-party backbench statement on SfU22</td><td><code>search_anforanden</code> (parti=L)</td><td>April–May 2026</td><td>Coalition unity risk signal</td></tr><tr><td>Svenska Bankföreningen TU21 position</td><td>— (external) + <code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>T4 escalation signal</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33 enforcement regulations</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (doktyp=Lagrådet)</td><td>Q3 2026</td><td><em>Vilande</em> re-affirmation risk signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement">📅 Section 9: Threat Evolution Timeline (v2.3 template requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement">📅 Section 9: Threat Evolution Timeline (v2.3 template requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title SfU22 ECHR Challenge — Expected Threat Evolution
     April 2026 : Committee adoption (HD01SfU22)
@@ -2124,7 +2124,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement">📅 S
     2027 : ECtHR admissibility decision
          : Potential Art. 39 interim measures</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-10-threat-level-change">📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-10-threat-level-change"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-10-threat-level-change">📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-10-threat-level-change"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2160,8 +2160,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-10-threat-level-change">📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH. Primary evidence is the full text of HD01FiU48, HD01SfU22, HD01KU32, HD01KU33 plus peer-jurisdiction ECtHR case law. See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a> for known gaps.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27">HD01CU27<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2216,10 +2216,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: MEDIUM (SUMMARY). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01CU27 adopts stricter identity-verification requirements at Lantmäteriet for property-title (<em>lagfart</em>) and leasehold-registration applications. This is the civil-affairs committee's <strong>anti-money-laundering</strong> contribution to the coalition's Tidöavtal-era financial-crime agenda: tightened identity checks prevent the use of property transactions to launder proceeds. Expected cross-party majority (≈330–0) reflects broad consensus on the policy direction, though implementation cost to Lantmäteriet is the principal operational concern. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong> (summary data only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01CU27] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Property · Anti-money-laundering]
@@ -2264,8 +2264,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification">📊 Political Classification<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Property / AML</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-1">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AML alignment</td><td>Aligns with 6AMLD + Financial Action Task Force recommendations</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Broad cross-party support</td><td>All parties back principle; only implementation details debated</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2309,7 +2309,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Implementation cost to Lantmäteriet</td><td>Agency remissvar cites staffing + IT costs</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Non-resident purchaser friction</td><td>Transaction slowdown for foreign buyers</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Contributes to Sweden's FATF compliance</td><td>Q3 2026 mutual evaluation cycle</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Integrates with TU21 state e-ID for verification layer</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §4</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2349,7 +2349,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Implementation delay if Lantmäteriet under-resourced</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-1">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-CU27-1</td><td>Lantmäteriet implementation delay</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU27-2</td><td>Foreign-purchaser friction complaints</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-1">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Technical; low salience</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td>No constitutional element</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td>AML directive alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Pre-election implementation path</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Consensus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>12/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2455,14 +2455,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td>Operational concern</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Real-estate industry</td><td>Cautious support</td><td>LOW friction</td></tr><tr><td>Finansinspektionen</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-society (Transparency International Sverige)</td><td>Support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28</strong> (housing register): Thematic sibling; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (state e-ID): Provides identity-layer architecture for CU27 verification; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §4</li>
 <li><strong>HD01SfU22</strong>: Enforcement-architecture cluster; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §2</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2491,8 +2491,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Window</th><th>MCP tool</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lantmäteriet implementation plan</td><td>Q3 2026</td><td><code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td></tr><tr><td>FATF Sweden mutual evaluation findings</td><td>Q4 2026</td><td>— (external)</td></tr><tr><td>Integration with TU21 API spec</td><td>2027+</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu28">HD01CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-1">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-1"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-1">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2547,10 +2547,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-1">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: MEDIUM (SUMMARY). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01CU28 establishes a national register for bostadsrätter (cooperative apartments) — a long-awaited market-transparency reform correcting an information asymmetry peculiar to Sweden's housing market. Unlike single-family homes and condominiums in most European jurisdictions, Swedish cooperative apartments have historically had no centralised ownership register, creating opacity, financial-crime vulnerability, and difficulty with mortgage-security assessment. The register aligns cooperative apartments with EU transparency norms and integrates with TU21 state e-ID and HD01CU27 identity verification. Implementation timeline spans 2027–2029. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong> (summary data only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-1">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-1">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01CU28] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Property · Consumer protection · Transparency]
@@ -2595,8 +2595,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-1">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Housing / Property / Transparency</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-1">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-2">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-2">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-2">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2623,7 +2623,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-2">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Closes long-standing market-transparency gap</td><td>CU: Finansinspektionen 2023 report cited as basis</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>AML/transparency architecture</td><td>Enables systemic financial-crime monitoring</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage-security valuation</td><td>Aligns cooperative apartments with condominium norms</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-2">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-2">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2645,7 +2645,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-2">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Privacy concern for individual owners</td><td>Register scope (full owner disclosure vs aggregated) debated</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Bostadsrättsföreningar administrative burden</td><td>HSB + Riksbyggen remissvar cite small-association cost</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-2">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-2">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2667,7 +2667,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-2">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Proptech innovation pipeline</td><td>Opens data for third-party mortgage/analytics products</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>EU transparency-directive alignment</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-2">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-2">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-2">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDPR compliance challenges on full-owner disclosure</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-1">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-2">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-1">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-CU28-1</td><td>Implementation delay 2027</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU28-2</td><td>GDPR compliance challenge on owner disclosure</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU28-3</td><td>HSB/Riksbyggen small-association cost backlash</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW-MODERATE.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-1">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-2">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2765,7 +2765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-1">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Housing-market voters; moderate salience</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td>No constitutional element</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Transparency-directive alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>2027–2029 rollout</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Owner-privacy debate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>14/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-1">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-1">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2803,13 +2803,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-1">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HSB, Riksbyggen (housing cooperatives)</td><td>Cautious</td><td>MEDIUM administrative burden</td></tr><tr><td>Finansinspektionen</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage industry</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Proptech sector</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten</td><td>Cautious on scope</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-1">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-1">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU27</strong> (identity at lagfart): Integrated verification pipeline; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (state e-ID): Identity-layer dependency; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §4</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-1">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-1">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-1">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Window</th><th>MCP tool</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Förordning implementation guidance</td><td>Q4 2026</td><td><code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td></tr><tr><td>Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten yttrande</td><td>Q3 2026</td><td><code>search_dokument</code></td></tr><tr><td>HSB + Riksbyggen transition plan</td><td>2027</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Document</strong>: HD01FiU48<br>
 <strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd<br>
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)<br>
@@ -2848,7 +2848,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <strong>Analyst Confidence</strong>: 🟦VERY HIGH<br>
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-21 14:45 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-document-summary">1. Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-document-summary">1. Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The Finance Committee (FiU) recommends that the Riksdag approve the government's extraordinary supplementary budget for 2026. The budget contains two measures:</p>
 <p><strong>Measure 1: Fuel Tax Cut (May 1 – September 30, 2026)</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2871,11 +2871,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-document-summary">1. Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Legal authority</strong>: Government may issue extraordinary supplementary budgets when "special reasons" exist (as permitted by the Riksdag Act). FiU finds the cited reasons (Middle East conflict + high winter energy prices) constitute such special reasons.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-six-analytical-lenses">2. Six Analytical Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-analytical-lenses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension">Lens 1: Constitutional/Legal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-six-analytical-lenses">2. Six Analytical Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-analytical-lenses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension">Lens 1: Constitutional/Legal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>The extraordinary budget (extra ändringsbudget) mechanism requires FiU to find "special reasons" (particularly strong justification). The committee accepts the government's framing. The fuel tax cut specifically aligns energy tax levels with EU minimum thresholds — paradoxically making this a compliance-oriented measure as well as an economic relief measure. No constitutional challenge expected.</p>
 <p><strong>Legal risk</strong>: LOW [HIGH confidence]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension">Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension">Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>This is the most electorally transparent measure in the April 2026 batch. The timing — five months before the September 14, 2026 general election — with a measure directly affecting petrol prices at every Swedish gas station — is an unambiguous electoral intervention. The government frames it as emergency relief; political scientists will note that emergency relief packages in election years are a textbook electoral strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral benefit</strong>: The 82 öre/liter cut represents approximately 5% of typical pump price. With ~5.7 million licensed drivers and ~4.8 million registered cars in Sweden, the measure is personally felt by a majority of eligible voters. The rural and suburban voter profile — already disproportionately car-dependent — aligns with the M+SD+KD+L coalition's core demographic.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition dilemma</strong>: S is squeezed between opposing "fossil fuel subsidies" (alienating climate voters) and appearing to deny cost-of-living relief to workers (alienating traditional S voters). V and MP will oppose vocally; C (rural/car-dependent base) may privately welcome the measure.</p>
@@ -2888,11 +2888,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension">Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dime
     style FiU48 fill:#ff0000,color:#fff
     style Rural fill:#00aa00,color:#fff
     style Budget fill:#aa0000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension">Lens 3: Policy Substance Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension">Lens 3: Policy Substance Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>The fuel tax cut brings Swedish energy taxes to the EU directive minimum — a floor set by the Energy Taxation Directive 2003/96/EC. This is a legitimate EU compliance observation, but the directive minimum was set in 2003 and has not been inflation-adjusted since, meaning it represents an extremely low floor by modern standards. Sweden has historically maintained much higher fuel taxes as part of its carbon pricing strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy reversal significance</strong>: Sweden had among the EU's highest fuel taxes pre-cut. Reducing to minimum temporarily reverses decades of progressive carbon pricing at the pump. If this becomes a political precedent, it complicates Sweden's Climate Action Plan targets and carbon price trajectory.</p>
 <p><strong>Energy support</strong>: The el- och gasprisstöd fills a political gap — the high January-February 2026 heating season coincided with a period of above-normal electricity spot prices (due to cold snap + reduced Norwegian hydro). The government cannot change past prices but can compensate affected households retroactively.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension">Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension">Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title FiU48 Fiscal Risk Assessment
     x-axis Low Fiscal Risk --> High Fiscal Risk
@@ -2907,7 +2907,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension">Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension<a
 <p>The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% of GDP — fiscally manageable but symbolically significant. With Sweden running near-zero structural deficit, the one-time cost is absorbable. The real fiscal risk is if the fuel tax cut is extended beyond September 2026 — permanent lower fuel taxes would reduce annual tax revenue by approximately 3 billion SEK per year.</p>
 <p><strong>Interest rate context</strong>: Sweden's Riksbank cut rates to ~2.5% in early 2026 after peak inflation subsided. The government can justify temporary stimulus given improved inflation conditions.</p>
 <p><strong>Economic data (World Bank verified)</strong>: Swedish inflation peaked at 8.5% in 2023 (FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG) before falling to 2.8% in 2024 — household energy cost burden remains politically salient even as headline inflation normalized. GDP growth recovered to 0.82% in 2024 (from -0.20% in 2023), providing fiscal headroom for temporary stimulus. Total 4.1B SEK cost ≈ 0.04% of Swedish GDP (603.7B USD in 2024).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension">Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension">Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension">Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimen
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Impact</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Private car owners (5.7M)</td><td>+33 SEK/month savings (petrol)</td><td>🟩 HIGH benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Truck/diesel operators</td><td>+200-400 SEK/tank savings</td><td>🟩 HIGH benefit</td></tr><tr><td>LRF farmers</td><td>Fuel cost reduction for agriculture</td><td>🟩 MEDIUM benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Fossil fuel retailers (Circle K, Preem, ST1)</td><td>Volume increase expected</td><td>🟩 MEDIUM benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Climate NGOs (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF)</td><td>Carbon price dilution</td><td>🔴 HIGH concern</td></tr><tr><td>S/MP/V opposition</td><td>Electoral disadvantage</td><td>🔴 HIGH concern</td></tr><tr><td>State budget</td><td>-4.1B SEK 2026</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM risk</td></tr><tr><td>EV drivers (SkU23 context)</td><td>Fuel competitors benefited not them</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM concern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension">Lens 6: Forward Indicators/Timeline Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension">Lens 6: Forward Indicators/Timeline Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3002,7 +3002,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension">Lens 6: Forward Indicato
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut takes effect</td><td>May 1, 2026</td><td>Immediate petrol price impact at pumps</td></tr><tr><td>Tax cut expires (unless extended)</td><td>September 30, 2026</td><td>Becomes post-election decision</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support payments</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Households receive retroactive support</td></tr><tr><td>General election</td><td>September 14, 2026</td><td>Voters likely to associate measure with government</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election budget debate</td><td>October 2026</td><td>New/returning government must decide on extension</td></tr><tr><td>EU energy tax directive review</td><td>2027</td><td>Commission expected to propose updated minimum levels</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-evidence-table">3. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-evidence-table">3. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3065,7 +3065,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-evidence-table">3. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Petrol tax cut 82 öre/liter</td><td>FiU48 report, explicit figure</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Diesel cut 319 SEK/m³</td><td>FiU48 report, explicit figure</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Total budget impact 4.1B SEK</td><td>FiU48 report, government proposal</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Income reduction 1.56B SEK</td><td>FiU48 report</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Expenditure increase 2.4B SEK</td><td>FiU48 report</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>May 1 - Sept 30 2026 period</td><td>FiU48 report</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU energy tax directive minimum</td><td>Context analysis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>5.7M licensed drivers in Sweden</td><td>Transportstyrelsen statistics</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish inflation 8.5% (2023), 2.8% (2024)</td><td>World Bank FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>GDP growth 0.82% (2024)</td><td>World Bank NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000">4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000">4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000">4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Measure extended beyond Sept 2026, reducing climate policy base</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Sunset clause built in; but election pressure may force extension</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition success in reframing as "fossil fuel subsidy"</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government must maintain "emergency relief" framing</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support insufficient (too low to cover actual bill increases)</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>More targeted support mechanisms possible</td></tr><tr><td>Carbon price signal disruption</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Climate NGO legal challenges, EU Commission concerns</td></tr><tr><td>Budget impact underestimated if fuel demand exceeds projections</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>One-time measure; capped by period</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific">5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific">5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3169,8 +3169,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific">5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)<a class="" aria-hidde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Demonstrate government "on the side of ordinary Swedes"</td><td>"Populist" label from climate-conscious media</td></tr><tr><td>Neutralize S cost-of-living attacks</td><td>EU Commission may flag carbon pricing regression</td></tr><tr><td>Rural and suburban voter activation</td><td>If prices rise again in Oct 2026, perceived relief is short-lived</td></tr><tr><td>Precedent for post-election energy policy</td><td>Competing with EV charging tax exemption (SkU23) narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-2">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-2"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-2">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3225,10 +3225,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-2">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: HIGH (FULL-TEXT). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-2">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-2">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01KU32 adopts as <em>vilande</em> under Regeringsformen 8:14 a grundlagsändring extending digital-accessibility obligations to press-freedom-protected media (TF- and YGL-registered publications). Its consequence is that the next Riksdag — chosen 14 September 2026 — must pass <strong>identical wording</strong> for the amendment to take effect (expected 1 January 2028). Cross-party support is broad; disability-rights organisations and all four opposition parties endorse the policy direction. The threat surface is not political opposition but procedural continuity: if even minor textual amendments are required after the election, the three-year cooling-off period restarts. <strong>[HIGH]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-2">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-2">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU32] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Constitutional / Media policy]
@@ -3284,8 +3284,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-2">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Standard grundlag process; no national-security element</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Constitutional / Media / Disability</td><td>TF + YGL + CRPD intersection</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td><td><em>Vilande</em> timeline</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td><td>Multi-party alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Legacy constitutional commitment</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td><td>Neither advances nor retards coalition cohesion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-2">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-3">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-3">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-3">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3312,7 +3312,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-3">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CRPD Article 9 compliance strengthening</td><td>KU32 <em>motivering</em> cites UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2022 observations</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Aligns with EU Accessibility Act 2025</td><td>KU32 cross-references Directive (EU) 2019/882 implementation</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Disability-rights sector unified in support</td><td>Funka + Synskadades Riksförbund remissvar supportive</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-3">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-3">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3334,7 +3334,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-3">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Press-freedom concern from small publishers</td><td>TU: SVT Online + large publishers assert cost burden for small TF-registered publications</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement ambiguity for user-generated content</td><td>KU32 §4 leaves implementation to förordning; scope unclear for comment sections</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-3">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-3">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3356,7 +3356,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-3">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Aligns Sweden with Nordic accessibility leadership (Norway AT, Finland WCAG)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §disability</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>CRPD 2027 Sweden review reports</td><td>Strengthens narrative</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-3">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-3">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3374,7 +3374,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-3">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Re-affirmation risk in fragmented post-election Riksdag</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math: P=0.85–0.95 re-affirm</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-2">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-3">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3407,7 +3407,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-2">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-KU32-1</td><td>Post-election Riksdag fails to re-affirm identically</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Cross-party briefing pre-election</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU32-2</td><td>Small publishers challenge proportionality</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Förordning-level exemption thresholds</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW (no critical or high exposure).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU32 lapses without re-affirmation" (goal: lapse)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU32 lapses without re-affirmation" (goal: lapse)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: KU32 lapses"]
     ROOT --> A["A: Post-election Riksdag rejects identical wording&#x3C;br/>(OR)"]
@@ -3419,7 +3419,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse">🌳 Att
     style B fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
 <p>Low-probability threat scenario overall.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-2">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-3">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3462,7 +3462,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-2">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Secondary story; disability-rights coverage</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Grundlag amendment</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">4</td><td>EU Accessibility Act alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Post-election dependency</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Multi-stakeholder debate on scope</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>19/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-2">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-2">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3500,14 +3500,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-2">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Disability orgs (Funka, SRF)</td><td>Support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Small publishers (Sveriges Tidskrifter)</td><td>Cautious</td><td>MEDIUM negative (cost)</td></tr><tr><td>Public broadcasters (SVT/SR/UR)</td><td>Support</td><td>NEUTRAL (already compliant)</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>Mixed support</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition (S, V, MP, C)</td><td>Support</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-2">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-2">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01KU33</strong> (dual <em>vilande</em>): Shared RF 8:14 procedural vehicle and post-election timing; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §3</li>
 <li><strong>HD01KU42</strong> (utgiftsområden): Constitutional-budget structure; same committee</li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (state e-ID): Digital-inclusion horizontal linkage</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-2">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-2">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3537,8 +3537,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-2">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Related</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a> (sibling <em>vilande</em>)</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-3">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-3"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-3">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3594,11 +3594,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-3">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>🛠️ Revision note</strong>: An earlier draft of this file incorrectly framed KU33 as a pro-transparency disclosure obligation. The actual amendment <strong>narrows</strong> public-records access for digitally seized materials. Revised 2026-04-21 after article/analysis reconciliation.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-3">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-3">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01KU33 adopts as <em>vilande grundlagsändring</em> an amendment to Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) establishing that <strong>digital recordings seized or copied during a <em>husrannsakan</em> (police search) are not deemed <em>allmänna handlingar</em></strong>. The rule also covers copies transferred between authorities pursuant to custody of the seized information carrier. A carve-back preserves public-records status for any recording that is <em>affixed</em> to a formal investigation or to separate authority business. As a grundlagsändring, re-affirmation by the post-election Riksdag is required; intended effect date 1 January 2027.</p>
 <p>Politically this is a <strong>transparency-restricting</strong> move, not a transparency-enhancing one. Proponents (government + prosecutorial authorities) argue it ends an anomaly by which entire mirrored hard drives could become searchable public records by default; critics (civil-society, press-freedom, and digital-rights groups) argue it creates a new zone of opaque state custody over personal data with only a narrow carve-back. This is the <strong>more fragile of the two dual-<em>vilande</em> amendments</strong>: an S-led post-election government may view the restriction as too broad and decline to re-propose it in identical wording. Re-affirmation probability 40–70% depending on election outcome (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math). <strong>[HIGH]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-3">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-3">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU33] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Constitutional / Justice / Public-records access]
@@ -3653,8 +3653,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-3">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Standard grundlag process</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Constitutional / TF / Justice</td><td>TF + offentlighetsprincipen</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td><td><em>Vilande</em> timing</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟡 WARM</td><td>Civil-liberties + press-freedom resistance</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Narrows public-records access in digital era</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>↓ slight tension</td><td>L-party cautious; S uncertain post-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-3">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-3"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-4">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-4"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-4">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-4">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-4">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Clarifies anomalous TF treatment of bulk digital-evidence copies</td><td>KU33 <em>motivering</em> references prior cases where whole mirrored drives became searchable public records</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Operational benefit to Åklagarmyndigheten + Polismyndigheten</td><td>Avoids resource-intensive sekretess-review of seized mass-storage media</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Carve-back preserves TF status where material is formally added to investigation file</td><td>KU33 §on <em>allmän handling</em> retention</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition (M, SD, KD, L) unified in support</td><td>Floor-vote readings from KU sitting</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-4">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-4">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3713,7 +3713,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-4">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Narrows <em>offentlighetsprincipen</em> in the digital domain</td><td>Civil Rights Defenders + Journalistförbundet remissvar critical</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Carve-back scope ambiguous for data-at-rest that is never formally "added"</td><td>KU33 <em>motivering</em> §on scope</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Creates opaque custody zone for bulk-extracted personal data</td><td>IMY (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten) yttrande flags data-minimisation concern</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-4">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-4">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-4">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Förordning-level data-minimisation and retention rules could meaningfully narrow scope</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Parallel non-constitutional transparency reforms (e.g., statistical reporting) could offset transparency loss</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-4">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-4">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3763,7 +3763,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-4">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Post-election lapse — most likely of dual <em>vilande</em> to fail</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Journalist/whistleblower chill effect on investigative reporting</td><td>Journalistförbundet remissvar</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Art. 10 challenge (media access) low-probability but non-zero</td><td>Referent cases: <em>Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary</em> (2016) on access to state-held information</td><td>🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-3">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-4">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3804,7 +3804,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-3">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-KU33-1</td><td>Post-election Riksdag lapses KU33</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td>Cross-party pre-election briefing on operational rationale</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU33-2</td><td>Carve-back scope drafting fails legal-certainty test</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande review + förordning clarification</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU33-3</td><td>Journalist/whistleblower chill effect documented in investigative reporting 2027+</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Transparency-by-statistics compensatory measures</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: MODERATE.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33 lapses after election"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33 lapses after election"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: KU33 lapses"]
     ROOT --> A["A: S-led post-election government&#x3C;br/>does not re-propose&#x3C;br/>(OR)"]
@@ -3818,7 +3818,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33
     style A1 fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
 <p>Cheapest attack path: A1 (S-led government reluctance to narrow public-records access).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-3">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-4">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3861,7 +3861,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-3">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Press-freedom + public-records coverage</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">5</td><td>TF amendment</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Indirect Charter Art. 11 (information) linkage</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Post-election dependency</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Civil-society + press-freedom resistance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-3">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-3">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3904,13 +3904,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-3">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Åklagarmyndigheten, Polismyndigheten</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive (operational)</td></tr><tr><td>Journalistförbundet, TU</td><td>Opposition</td><td>HIGH negative (press-freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>Civil Rights Defenders</td><td>Opposition</td><td>HIGH negative (transparency)</td></tr><tr><td>Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)</td><td>Mixed — supports scope limits but flags carve-back scope</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>Supportive with L cautious on scope</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition (S, V, MP, C)</td><td>S cautious, V+MP opposed, C ambivalent</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-3">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-3">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01KU32</strong> (dual <em>vilande</em>): Shared vehicle; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a> — but thematically opposite (KU32 <em>expands</em> accessibility)</li>
 <li><strong>HD01SfU22</strong> (inhibition): Adjacent state-surveillance + rule-of-law space; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-3">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-3">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3945,8 +3945,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-3">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Related</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a> (sibling <em>vilande</em>, contrasting direction)</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku42">HD01KU42<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku42"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-4">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-4"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-4">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3998,10 +3998,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-4">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU42</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:42 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>KU (Konstitutionsutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-4">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-4">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>KU42 concerns the division of Sweden's state budget into expenditure areas (utgiftsområden) — the constitutional architecture that defines how Riksdag controls spending. This seemingly technical matter carries significant political weight: changes to expenditure area classification affect committee jurisdictions, budget flexibility, and governmental accountability. The Constitutional Committee handling this report indicates it has constitutional dimensions, not merely administrative ones. Coming at a time when Sweden's defense budget (utgiftsområde 6) has seen dramatic increases and climate/energy policies are reshaping infrastructure spending (UO21/22/23), the division question directly affects which committees control which funds. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-4">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-4">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-4"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU42] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Constitutional · Budget Architecture · Parliamentary Control"]
@@ -4012,8 +4012,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-4">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style D fill:#44cc44,color:#000
     style G fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-4">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-4"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-5">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-5"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-5">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-5">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4040,7 +4040,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-5">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Parliamentary control</td><td>Clear expenditure areas improve accountability and audit trail</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Defense budget clarity</td><td>Separating defense infrastructure from general infrastructure UOs aids transparency</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative modernization</td><td>Updated classifications reflect post-pandemic policy architecture</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-5">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-5">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4062,7 +4062,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-5">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Inter-committee rivalry</td><td>Changes to UO classification shift power between committees</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Complexity</td><td>Complex cross-UO programs (climate + energy + transport) difficult to segregate cleanly</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-5">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-5">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4079,7 +4079,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-5">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Streamlined Riksdag oversight</td><td>Consolidated UOs reduce audit fragmentation</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-5">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-5">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4097,7 +4097,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-5">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Political manipulation of UO boundaries</td><td>Majority may draw UO lines to advantage coalition committees</td><td>🟥LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-condensed">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives-condensed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-condensed">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-condensed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4141,7 +4141,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-condensed">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (C
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Low awareness; indirect impact through budget transparency</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Supportive of efficient budget architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition</strong></td><td>Alert to any UO changes that reduce oversight of defense spending</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Neutral; monitors UO changes affecting investment grants</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society</strong></td><td>Low interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>No direct interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>KU mandate to ensure compliance with Riksdag Act §§</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media</strong></td><td>Limited interest unless linked to specific budget controversy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4167,12 +4167,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UO change reduces oversight of defense spending</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>Climate/energy UO fragmentation</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥LOW — Highly technical; not salient to voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — Establishes budget architecture for 2027+ electoral cycle governments.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku43">HD01KU43<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku43"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-5">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-5"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-5">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4224,10 +4224,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-5">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU43</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:42 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>KU (Konstitutionsutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-5">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-5">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>KU43 establishes a new law governing the Riksdag's medal — replacing outdated regulations with a modern legal framework for how parliament honors distinguished service. While ceremonially significant, this is administratively routine and politically non-contentious. The Constitutional Committee's involvement reflects Riksdag's self-governance prerogatives under Chapter 4 of the Instrument of Government. The primary political significance is in how the medal criteria are defined — who qualifies and what types of service are honored shapes Riksdag's institutional identity and its relationship with civil society partners. <strong>[VERY LOW]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-5">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-5">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-5"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU43] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Parliamentary Administration · Institutional Law"]
@@ -4235,31 +4235,31 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-5">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     D -->|"🟢 ROUTINE"| E[Low controversy — administrative update]
     style D fill:#44cc44,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-condensed">💪 SWOT Analysis (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-condensed"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-6">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-6"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-condensed">💪 SWOT Analysis (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-condensed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-6">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Modernizes outdated medal statute; enhances institutional transparency</li>
 <li>Clear legal basis for Riksdag's self-governance</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-6">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-6">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Limited substantive policy impact</li>
 <li>Risk of criteria being perceived as politically partisan if awarded inconsistently</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-6">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-6">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Signal parliamentary institutional health and non-partisan tradition</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-6">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-6">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Minimal (administrative only)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥VERY LOW — No direct electoral relevance.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21">HD01MJU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-6">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-6"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-6">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4311,10 +4311,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-6">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01MJU21</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser för jordbrukets klimatomställning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:41 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>MJU (Miljö- och jordbruksutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-6">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-6">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>MJU21 marks the Environment and Agriculture Committee's formal parliamentary response to the National Audit Office (Riksrevisionen) report on state support for agriculture's climate transition. The timing is politically charged: Sweden's agriculture sector produces approximately 13% of national greenhouse gas emissions, yet receives substantial state subsidies (CAP + national co-financing) without demonstrably achieving emissions reductions. The Riksrevisionen's underlying report criticizes the lack of coherent measurement systems, overlapping responsibilities between Jordbruksverket and Naturvårdsverket, and insufficient conditionality in support programs. The committee's response (expected to endorse Riksrevisionen's recommendations) marks a potentially significant shift toward tighter environmental conditions on agricultural subsidies — a direct threat to farming organizations and a potential source of rural voter discontent ahead of the 2026 election. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only; analysis based on Riksrevisionen report patterns and MJU political context)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-6">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-6">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-6"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01MJU21] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Agricultural Policy · Climate Policy · Audit Finding"]
@@ -4327,8 +4327,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-6">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style G fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style H fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-5">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-5"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-7">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-7"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-6">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-7">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4355,7 +4355,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-7">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen legitimacy</td><td>Audit findings carry constitutional authority; difficult for government to dismiss</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU CAP alignment</td><td>EU Common Agricultural Policy 2023-2027 requires eco-schemes; Sweden underperforming</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition opportunity</td><td>KD and C support sustainable farming; M supports efficiency; reform could unite coalition</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-7">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-7">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4382,7 +4382,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-7">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural voter risk</td><td>Tightening conditions on farming subsidies alienates C/SD rural voters</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Measurement gaps</td><td>No established baseline for agricultural GHG emissions reductions at farm level</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional fragmentation</td><td>Dual responsibility (Jordbruksverket + Naturvårdsverket) without clear lead agency</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-7">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-7">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4404,7 +4404,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-7">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden as EU climate leader</td><td>Implementing genuine agricultural climate conditions would position Sweden above EU average</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Technology-driven transition</td><td>Precision agriculture, biogas, and cover crops can achieve reductions without income loss</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-7">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-7">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4432,7 +4432,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-7">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Farmer organization backlash</td><td>LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) fiercely opposes binding conditions</td><td>��HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C-party defection risk</td><td>C (Center Party) represents rural constituencies; may resist binding conditions</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden's 2026 emission targets</td><td>Missing Parisavtalet agriculture commitments exposes Sweden to EU criticism</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-1">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4485,7 +4485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Concern</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Supportive of climate action; divided on farmer impact</td><td>Green transition vs. food costs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Officially supportive of Riksrevisionen; M/KD push efficiency</td><td>Avoid alienating rural C/SD voters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition Bloc</strong></td><td>MP strongly supportive; S cautious; V demand binding conditions</td><td>Speed and ambition of transition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>LRF opposed; food processors neutral; biogas sector supportive</td><td>Subsidy conditions, competitiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society</strong></td><td>Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF strongly supportive</td><td>Biodiversity, climate commitments</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>EU Commission monitoring CAP eco-scheme performance</td><td>Sweden's CAP strategic plan effectiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>No specific risk</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media/Public Opinion</strong></td><td>Sympathetic to climate; sympathetic also to struggling farmers</td><td>Narrative balance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-1">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-1">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4528,21 +4528,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-1">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C-party demands weakened conditions</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td><td>Negotiate eco-scheme flexibility with local adaptation</td></tr><tr><td>LRF lobbying campaign undermines reform</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Government communication on long-term competitiveness</td></tr><tr><td>EU CAP compliance failure</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>Assign clear lead agency (Jordbruksverket) with targets</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural emissions increase continues</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>Binding measurement system and reporting requirements</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — C-party voters (rural, farming) are sensitive; SD rural voters equally so.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong> — C may seek carve-outs for small farmers; SD will prioritize food security narrative over climate.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Agricultural climate transition is more salient among urban climate voters (S/MP/V) than rural voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — If genuine accountability mechanisms established, marks first real step toward Swedish agricultural emission accountability since Paris Agreement.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-4">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-4">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-4"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>May 2026</strong> — Chamber vote on MJU21; watch for C-party reservations or amendment demands</li>
 <li><strong>Q3 2026</strong> — Government response to Riksrevisionen with action plan timeline</li>
 <li><strong>2027</strong> — Mid-term CAP review: Sweden assessed against eco-scheme targets</li>
 </ol>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22">HD01SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-7">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-7"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-7">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-7"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4594,10 +4594,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-7">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01SfU22</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Inhibition av verkställigheten – en ny ordning för vissa utlänningar vid tillfälliga verkställighetshinder</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:40 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>SUMMARY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-7">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-7">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>The Social Insurance Committee's report SfU22 proposes a fundamentally new approach to handling aliens with temporary enforcement obstacles — replacing temporary residence permits with a system of "inhibition" (suspension of deportation) combined with mandatory check-ins and geographic restrictions. This represents a significant tightening of migration policy, eliminating the pathway through which individuals blocked from deportation could effectively gain temporary residence. The reform directly advances the SD-M-KD-L government's migration policy agenda and is expected to face fierce opposition from S, V, and MP on humanitarian grounds. The measure significantly reduces the discretion available to Migrationsverket and expands state surveillance capabilities over individuals awaiting deportation. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong> (summary data only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-7">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-7">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-7"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01SfU22] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🔴 RESTRICTED"| C[Migration/Rule of Law]
@@ -4610,8 +4610,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-7">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style H fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style K fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-6">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-6"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-8">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-8"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-7">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-8">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4643,7 +4643,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-8">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Closes legal loophole</td><td>Temporary residence permits effectively rewarded individuals who couldn't be deported; inhibition system removes this incentive (HD01SfU22 summary)</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition cohesion</td><td>Aligns with SD-M-KD-L priority on controlled migration; passes with coalition majority</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative efficiency</td><td>Migrationsverket no longer required to issue and renew temporary permits; reduces administrative burden</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Threat management</td><td>Enables geographic restrictions and mandatory check-ins for individuals posing security risks</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-8">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-8">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4670,7 +4670,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-8">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Human rights exposure</td><td>Inhibited persons with no pathway to residence — prolonged limbo raises ECHR Article 3/5 concerns</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional risk</td><td>Creating new surveillance category without full residence rights tests Article 2 Protocol 4 ECHR</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Practicability</td><td>Mandatory geographic restrictions unenforceable without significant policing resources</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-8">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-8">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4692,7 +4692,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-8">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Broader migration reform anchor</td><td>SfU22 signals alignment with EU Returns Directive; positions Sweden favorably in EU migration negotiations</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition credibility booster</td><td>SD base reward — demonstrates government can tighten migration beyond just asylum</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-8">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-8">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4720,7 +4720,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-8">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Court overturning</td><td>Sweden's Migration Court of Appeal may strike down geographic restrictions as disproportionate</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU infringement risk</td><td>If inhibition conditions deemed to create de facto statelessness contrary to EU Charter</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Political backlash</td><td>S, V, MP will campaign on humanitarian grounds in 2026 election; vulnerability to "cruel Sweden" narrative</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-1">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-2">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4782,7 +4782,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-1">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Concern</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Split (≈55% supportive per SIFO migration polling)</td><td>Order and rule of law vs. humanitarian treatment</td><td>General Swedish polling on migration enforcement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Closing residence permit loophole; deterrence effect</td><td>HD01SfU22 aligns with Tidöavtalet migration commitments</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Creation of rightless limbo status; ECHR compliance</td><td>Social Democrats previously backed temporary permits as humanitarian tool</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Neutral-concerned</td><td>Labour supply uncertainty for sectors relying on asylum labor</td><td>Sectors: care, food processing, construction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society (FARR, Red Cross)</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Conditions of inhibited persons; access to legal aid</td><td>FARR has historically challenged enforcement orders</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>Monitoring</td><td>EU Returns Directive compatibility check</td><td>European Commission migration compliance reviews</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>Alert</td><td>Administrative custody without residence permit classification</td><td>Migration courts will face novel legal questions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media/Public Opinion</strong></td><td>Polarized</td><td>Framing as humanitarian vs. rule-of-law issue</td><td>Aftonbladet (critical) vs. Svenska Dagbladet (supportive)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-2">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-2">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4825,22 +4825,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-2">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ECHR violation finding</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Ensure legal aid access; amend geographic restriction scope</td></tr><tr><td>Political weaponization in 2026 campaign</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government must pre-empt with humanitarian safeguards communication</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement failure — inhibition unenforced</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td><td>Police resource allocation; Migrationsverket coordination</td></tr><tr><td>EU infringement proceeding</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Legal review against EU Charter Article 7, 18, 19</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Migration enforcement is a top-3 voter issue; SfU22 directly activates SD and M voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong> — SD will claim credit; M positioned as competent manager; if ECHR violations materialize, could damage coalition's rule-of-law credentials.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong> 🟩HIGH — Migration enforcement surveys consistently show 40-55% of Swedish voters prioritize stricter enforcement.</p>
 <p><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Opposition will campaign on "Sweden creating a stateless underclass" — risk of international attention.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — If implemented successfully before September 2026 election, becomes a permanent tightening that future S-led government would struggle to reverse.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-5">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-5">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-5"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>May 2026 chamber vote</strong> — Will pass with coalition majority (M+SD+KD+L); watch for SD amendment requests to expand restrictions</li>
 <li><strong>June 1, 2026</strong> — Implementation date; first inhibition orders expected within weeks; early court challenges anticipated by July 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Q3 2026</strong> — Migration Court of Appeal first rulings on geographic restriction proportionality; determines if reform survives legally</li>
 </ol>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu16">HD01TU16<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-8">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-8"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-8">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-8"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4895,10 +4895,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-8">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: MEDIUM (SUMMARY). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-8">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-8">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01TU16 removes the mandatory introductory driver-training requirement for certain private practice driving situations. The reform addresses a commonly-criticised bureaucratic friction in Sweden's driver-licensing pipeline — practice driving with a family member previously required the supervising adult to complete a one-day introductory course (~1,500 SEK) in addition to other qualifications. TU committee concluded the training requirement did not deliver measurable road-safety benefits relative to its compliance cost. This is a low-salience administrative reform with cross-party support; Transportstyrelsen remissvar cautiously supportive. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-8">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-8">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-8"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU16] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Transport · Road safety]
@@ -4943,8 +4943,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-8">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Transport / Administrative</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-7">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-7"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-9">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-9"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-8">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-9">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4971,7 +4971,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-9">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reduces household administrative cost</td><td>Estimated ~1,500 SEK + half-day per learner household</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Aligns Swedish practice with Nordic norms</td><td>Norway and Denmark do not require equivalent training</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition "regelförenkling" deliverable</td><td>Part of coalition agreement administrative-simplification agenda</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-9">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-9">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4993,7 +4993,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-9">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>STR (Sveriges Trafikutbildares Riksförbund) opposition</td><td>Industry body cites road-safety concern; remissvar critical</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Road-safety evidence ambiguity</td><td>Transportstyrelsen 2023 study inconclusive on training's marginal safety contribution</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-9">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-9">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5010,7 +5010,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-9">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reduces driver-licensing backlog (1.5-year wait in 2024)</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-9">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-9">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5028,7 +5028,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-9">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Road-safety framing if accident statistics spike 2027–2028</td><td>Statistical noise likely but narrative risk present</td><td>🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-4">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-5">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5058,7 +5058,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-4">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-TU16-1</td><td>Post-implementation accident-stat uptick reframed as reform failure</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td></tr><tr><td>R-TU16-2</td><td>STR industry narrative against reform</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-4">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-5">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5101,7 +5101,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-4">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Low salience</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Administrative</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Domestic</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Pre-election implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">2</td><td>STR resistance only</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>10/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-4">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-4">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5134,14 +5134,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-4">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Learner drivers + families</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive (cost saving)</td></tr><tr><td>STR industry</td><td>Opposition</td><td>MEDIUM negative (revenue loss)</td></tr><tr><td>Transportstyrelsen</td><td>Cautious support</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>Trafikverket</td><td>Neutral</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-4">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-4">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01TU19</strong> (port security): Same committee, different theme</li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (e-ID): Same committee but non-comparable policy area</li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU22</strong> (tachograph): Same committee; EU compliance counterpart</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-6">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-6">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5171,8 +5171,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-6">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence note</strong>: Analysis based on SUMMARY depth; full motivtext from <code>hd01tu16.json</code> would upgrade confidence to HIGH.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu19">HD01TU19<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu19"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-9">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-9"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-9">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-9"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5224,10 +5224,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-9">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01TU19</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Ny lag om kommunal hamnverksamhet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:43 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-9">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-9">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>TU19 introduces new legislation governing municipal port operations — a sector that intersects infrastructure ownership (kommunal self-governance), commercial port competition, EU state aid rules, and national security (civilian ports' dual-use military significance has grown since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022). Sweden has 52 commercial ports; 30+ are municipally owned. The law likely addresses operational efficiency, competitive conditions relative to private ports, and potentially security classifications. Municipal port governance is directly relevant to Sweden's Total Defence (Totalförsvar) planning, as ports are critical infrastructure for NATO resupply logistics. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-9">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-9">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-9"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU19] --> B{Dimensions}
     B --> C["Infrastructure · Municipal Governance · Defence · EU Competition"]
@@ -5238,35 +5238,35 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-9">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style D fill:#ffaa00,color:#000
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-8">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-8"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-10">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-10"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-9">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-10">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Modernizes port governance for competitive environment</li>
 <li>Addresses EU state aid compliance issues for municipal port subsidies</li>
 <li>Can codify security classification requirements for Total Defence</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-10">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-10">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Municipal autonomy constraints may limit operational efficiency reforms</li>
 <li>Ports vary enormously (Göteborg's massive private port vs. small municipal ferries)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-10">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-10">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>NATO logistics planning requires clear port command structures</li>
 <li>Standardization can attract private investment partnerships</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-10">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-10">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Municipal lobbying against commercial constraints (SKL/SKR)</li>
 <li>Security dimensions may create NATO-sensitive information sharing complications</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥LOW — Infrastructure and local governance; not a voter hot-button issue.</p>
 <p><strong>Defence Dimension</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Parties competing on defence credibility should highlight port security improvements.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu21">HD01TU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu21"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-10">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-10"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-10">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5318,10 +5318,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-10">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01TU21</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>En statlig e-legitimation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:41 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-10">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-10">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>TU21 proposes a state-issued electronic identity (e-legitimation) for Sweden — a policy debated for over a decade with profound implications for digital governance, private sector competition, and citizen rights. A state e-ID would reduce dependency on bank-issued BankID, which currently holds near-monopoly status among Sweden's 8.5 million digital users. The proposal places the Traffic Committee in an unusual lead role on a digital identity issue that crosses ICT, banking, and constitutional domain boundaries. The coalition government frames this as digital equity and security modernization; the opposition and banking sector have historically resisted due to competition and privacy concerns. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata only — full assessment pending chamber debate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-10">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-10">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-10"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU21] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Digital Governance — e-ID Infrastructure"]
@@ -5333,8 +5333,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-10">📊 Political Classification<a class="
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style G fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-9">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-9"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-11">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-11"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-10">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-11">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5361,7 +5361,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-11">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" h
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Digital equity</td><td>15-20% of Swedish adults lack BankID access (elderly, migrants, unbanked)</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU eIDAS2 compliance</td><td>EU eIDAS2 Regulation (effective 2024) requires member states to offer trusted digital identity wallets</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Security standardization</td><td>State e-ID enables higher assurance level (LoA3/4) than current commercial offerings</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-11">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-11">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5388,7 +5388,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-11">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BankID entrenched</td><td>BankID used by 8.5M Swedes; state e-ID faces major adoption challenge</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation cost</td><td>State infrastructure build-out estimated in hundreds of millions SEK</td><td>🟥LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Privacy risk</td><td>Central state identity registry creates honeypot for cyberattacks and government surveillance</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-11">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-11">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5410,7 +5410,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-11">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cross-border EU recognition</td><td>eIDAS2 enables Swedish state e-ID use across EU member states</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Public service modernization</td><td>Enables digital-first government services for all citizens including vulnerable groups</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-11">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-11">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5433,7 +5433,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-11">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Banking sector lobbying</td><td>Sweden's major banks (SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Nordea) will resist displacement of BankID revenue</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation delay</td><td>Complex cross-ministry coordination (Finance, Justice, ICT, DIGG) risks timeline slippage</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-2">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-3">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5486,7 +5486,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-2">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Concern</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Broadly supportive</td><td>Accessibility for excluded groups</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Digital sovereignty, EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition Bloc</strong></td><td>Cautiously supportive</td><td>Privacy, implementation risks</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Split: banks (opposed), fintechs (opportunity)</td><td>BankID market disruption</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Digital inclusion for elderly, migrants</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>eIDAS2 implementation deadline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>Monitoring</td><td>Data protection, GDPR Article 9</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media/Public Opinion</strong></td><td>Positive-neutral</td><td>Long-overdue modernization</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-3">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-3">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5529,21 +5529,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-3">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BankID lobbying delays implementation</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government must set firm eIDAS2 compliance deadline</td></tr><tr><td>Data breach of central e-ID registry</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>Defense-in-depth security architecture, distributed storage</td></tr><tr><td>Low adoption rate</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Mandate for government services; interoperability with BankID</td></tr><tr><td>eIDAS2 non-compliance fine</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Fast-track implementation with DIGG lead authority</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Digitalization is a second-tier issue; salient for tech-savvy voters and elderly communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong> — Cross-party support likely; rare area of political consensus. Government can claim digital modernization achievement.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong> 🟥LOW-MEDIUM — Most voters unaware of eIDAS2 pressure; framed as "making it easier to access public services."</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — If implemented, becomes a lasting digital infrastructure investment; similar to introduction of personnummer (social security number) in 1947 as foundational state identifier.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-7">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-7">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-7"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Q2 2026 chamber vote</strong> — Expected to pass with broad cross-party support</li>
 <li><strong>2026-2027</strong> — DIGG (Agency for Digital Government) designated as implementation authority; pilot program with 50,000 users</li>
 <li><strong>2027-2028</strong> — Full rollout with eIDAS2 cross-border functionality</li>
 </ol>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu22">HD01TU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-11">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-11"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-11">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-11"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5595,10 +5595,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-11">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01TU22</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Åtgärder mot manipulation och missbruk av färdskrivare</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:43 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-11">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-11">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>TU22 addresses a serious problem in Sweden's road freight sector: systematic manipulation of digital tachographs (färdskrivare) — devices that record driving and rest times for trucks and buses. Tachograph manipulation enables carriers to circumvent EU working time rules, endangering road safety and creating unfair competition against compliant operators. This is an EU compliance measure with direct road safety and fair competition dimensions. The proposal likely introduces enhanced penalties, improved Transportstyrelsen inspection authority, and technical safeguards against tampering. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-11">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-11">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-11"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU22] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Transport · Road Safety · Labour Law · Competition"]
@@ -5609,30 +5609,30 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-11">📊 Political Classification<a class="
     style F fill:#88cc44,color:#000
     style G fill:#44aa00,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-10">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-10"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-12">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-11">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-12">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>EU compliance maintains market access for Swedish transport sector</li>
 <li>Reduces road safety risk from fatigued drivers</li>
 <li>Levels competitive playing field between Swedish and Eastern European operators</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-12">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-12">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Enforcement capacity of Transportstyrelsen limited relative to traffic volume</li>
 <li>Swedish operators may lose competitive edge if Eastern European competitors non-compliant</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-12">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-12">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Strengthen Sweden's reputation for compliance in EU transport market</li>
 <li>Digital tachograph blockchain verification emerging EU standard</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-12">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-12">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Transport company lobbying against inspection costs</li>
 <li>Cross-border enforcement gaps (non-Swedish registered vehicles)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-4">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-4">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5658,12 +5658,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-4">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Continued manipulation with inadequate enforcement</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-border enforcement gap</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-6">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-6">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥LOW — Specialist transport sector issue; relevant to union (IF Metall, Transport) voters.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526">🏛️ Riksdag Seat Configuration (Riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526">🏛️ Riksdag Seat Configuration (Riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5699,7 +5699,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526">🏛️ Riksdag Seat
 </blockquote>
 <p>The government majority is a <strong>one-seat margin (176–173)</strong>. This makes every coalition-internal defection decisive. Historical floor-vote deviation since 2023: <strong>7 instances of L-party backbench dissent</strong> on ECHR/rule-of-law issues; <strong>3 instances of C-party cross-floor voting</strong> on agriculture.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--vote-margin-forecast-by-report">📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--vote-margin-forecast-by-report"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vote-margin-forecast-by-report">📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-margin-forecast-by-report"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5820,23 +5820,23 @@ <h2 id="rm--vote-margin-forecast-by-report">📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report<
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok_id</th><th>Expected floor vote</th><th align="center">Projected yes–no</th><th align="center">Margin</th><th align="center">Pivot risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Coalition bloc vote</td><td align="center">176–165 (8 abstain)</td><td align="center">+11</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Coalition bloc vote</td><td align="center">176–173</td><td align="center">+3</td><td align="center">🟠 <strong>L-backbench watch</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 <em>(vilande)</em></td><td>Dual passage — cross-party</td><td align="center">≈280–40</td><td align="center">+240</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33 <em>(vilande)</em></td><td>Dual passage — cross-party</td><td align="center">≈220–90</td><td align="center">+130</td><td align="center">🟡 Press-freedom mobilisation</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈290–25</td><td align="center">+265</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe (C/S support)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Cross-party acceptance</td><td align="center">≈320–0 (Riksrev skr.)</td><td align="center">≈320</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe (audit acceptance)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>Cross-party acceptance</td><td align="center">≈320–0</td><td align="center">≈320</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Coalition + C support</td><td align="center">≈260–60</td><td align="center">+200</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈305–18</td><td align="center">+287</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe (V/MP abstain)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈330–0</td><td align="center">≈330</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈300–20</td><td align="center">+280</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>Coalition majority</td><td align="center">176–150 (23 abstain)</td><td align="center">+26</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈320–0</td><td align="center">≈320</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU22</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈330–0</td><td align="center">≈330</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈330–0</td><td align="center">≈330</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Projections based on committee-stage party positions + historical voting patterns for analogous bills.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--the-critical-path-sfu22">🎯 The Critical Path: SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--the-critical-path-sfu22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-the-critical-path-sfu22">🎯 The Critical Path: SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-critical-path-sfu22"></a></h3>
 <p>SfU22's expected <strong>176–173</strong> margin is the narrowest of the batch. Three scenarios govern pivot risk:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082">Scenario A — Coalition holds (P=0.82)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082">Scenario A — Coalition holds (P=0.82)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082"></a></h4>
 <p>All 176 coalition MPs vote yes. All 173 opposition MPs vote no. Passes <strong>+3</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012">Scenario B — L-backbench dissent (P=0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012">Scenario B — L-backbench dissent (P=0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012"></a></h4>
 <p>1–3 L MPs abstain or vote no on ECHR grounds (Protocol 4 Art. 2 exposure). Result:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>1 L abstention → 175–172 = <strong>+3</strong> (still passes via reduced-parliament rule if quorum met)</li>
 <li>2 L abstention → 174–173 = <strong>+1</strong> (precarious)</li>
 <li>3 L abstention → 173–173 = <strong>tie</strong>, proposition referred back</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005">Scenario C — C-party split (P=0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005">Scenario C — C-party split (P=0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005"></a></h4>
 <p>C-party (24 MPs) bloc-abstains while signalling intention to negotiate. 176–149 = <strong>+27</strong>, but shifts post-election calculus.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001">Scenario D — Tie/referral (P=0.01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001">Scenario D — Tie/referral (P=0.01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001"></a></h4>
 <p>Deputy-speaker's tie-break invoked; coalition retains on tie-break in Swedish parliamentary practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33">🧮 <em>Vilande</em> Constitutional Math (KU32, KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33">🧮 <em>Vilande</em> Constitutional Math (KU32, KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33"></a></h3>
 <p>Regeringsformen 8:14 requires <em>identical wording</em> passed by two Riksdags with an election between. <strong>The next Riksdag is unknown</strong> — the math depends on the September 2026 election outcome.</p>
 
 
@@ -5876,7 +5876,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33">🧮 <em>Vilande</em> Constit
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Post-election scenario</th><th align="center">KU32 re-affirm prob.</th><th align="center">KU33 re-affirm prob.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Coalition retained (M+SD+KD+L majority)</td><td align="center">0.90</td><td align="center">0.85</td></tr><tr><td>S-led minority (S + V + MP informal)</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">0.35</td></tr><tr><td>Grand coalition (M+S)</td><td align="center">0.80</td><td align="center">0.55</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP+C majority</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center">0.25</td></tr><tr><td>Inconclusive → technical PM</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td align="center">0.45</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>KU33 (digital-seizure access restriction) is the more fragile</strong>: it is framed here as <em>restricting</em> public access to digitally seized materials (a TF-amendment narrowing the <em>allmän handling</em> scope for mirror-imaged storage) — a transparency-narrowing move. An S-led government may view the restriction as too broad an override of <em>offentlighetsprincipen</em> and decline to re-propose in identical wording. KU32 (media accessibility) has broad disability-rights cross-party support and is significantly safer.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch">📈 Coalition Unity Index (CUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch">📈 Coalition Unity Index (CUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch"></a></h3>
 <p>CUI = fraction of coalition MPs voting with the majority on roll-call votes for the batch. Target = 1.00.</p>
 
 
@@ -5918,7 +5918,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch">📈 Coalition Unity Index (C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Report</th><th align="center">Projected CUI</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center"><strong>0.97</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center"><strong>0.99</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Batch average</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.99</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Compared with Q1 2026 average (0.99), this batch shows <strong>no erosion of coalition cohesion</strong>. The marginal 0.97 on SfU22 reflects L-backbench historical volatility on ECHR issues, not organised dissent.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch">🗳️ Opposition Unity Index (OUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch">🗳️ Opposition Unity Index (OUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch"></a></h3>
 <p>OUI = fraction of opposition (S+V+MP+C, 173 MPs) voting together.</p>
 
 
@@ -5953,10 +5953,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch">🗳️ Opposition Unity
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Report</th><th align="center">Projected OUI</th><th>Dissent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td align="center">0.98</td><td>C possibly abstains rather than no</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">0.92</td><td>S votes no for different reasons than V (proportionality vs abolition)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td>V/MP support accessibility grundlag, S neutral, C neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">0.85</td><td>Press-freedom alignment across all four parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Asymmetric-unity pattern</strong>: opposition unified against enforcement/fiscal measures (0.92–0.98), split on constitutional modernisation (0.75). This mirrors the motions-cycle pattern (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../motions/coalition-mathematics.md</code></a>).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications">⚖️ Reduced-Parliament (Minskad Riksdag) Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications">⚖️ Reduced-Parliament (Minskad Riksdag) Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications"></a></h3>
 <p>Although the reduced-parliament quorum provisions are a separate constitutional track, the <strong>one-seat government margin</strong> means that if a foreign/security crisis triggered reduced-parliament rules, the current 176-MP coalition coalition could struggle to maintain a working majority within any 175-MP subset. This is the operational fragility the reduced-parliament amendments are designed to address — and is itself a reason the pre-election constitutional package is politically sensitive.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-analyses">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-analyses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-analyses">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-analyses"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — Why these margins matter</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — Bayesian scenario tree</li>
@@ -5967,14 +5967,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-analyses">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟨 MEDIUM — Projections extrapolated from committee-stage positions + historical analogues. Actual floor votes will refine.
 <strong>Next Update</strong>: 2026-04-29 (post-kammaren roll calls on FiU48 and SfU22).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Peer-jurisdiction benchmarking across fiscal, migration, constitutional, and digital policy axes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--overview">🌍 Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview-1">🌍 Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's 2026-04-21 committee package contains four internationally comparable policy moves. This document benchmarks each against 4–6 peer jurisdictions to establish whether Sweden is moving toward or away from mainstream European practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief">1. <strong>FiU48 — Election-Year Fuel-Tax Relief</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief">1. <strong>FiU48 — Election-Year Fuel-Tax Relief</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6048,7 +6048,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief">1. <strong>FiU48 — Election
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden is replicating the <strong>Germany 2022 <em>Tankrabatt</em> template</strong> — the closest direct precedent. Germany's <em>Tankrabatt</em> was <strong>not extended</strong> despite political pressure and left a structural inflation-control gap. Of six peer cases, <strong>zero</strong> converted temporary fuel-tax cuts into permanent structural relief. Sweden's sunset-clause framing is therefore in line with European practice; the <strong>post-election extension pressure</strong> is the comparatively novel risk factor, driven by Sweden's election coinciding with the sunset date.</p>
 <p><strong>Tax-floor comparison</strong>: By cutting to the EU Energy Tax Directive 2003/96/EC minimum, Sweden moves from upper-quartile fuel taxation (~95th percentile in EU) to the <strong>floor</strong>. Only Bulgaria (structurally) and Hungary (sanctions-era emergency) have operated at or below this level in EU-27 history. This is a <strong>significant positional change</strong> for a Nordic welfare state.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit">2. <strong>SfU22 — Migration Inhibition vs Temporary Permit</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit">2. <strong>SfU22 — Migration Inhibition vs Temporary Permit</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6099,7 +6099,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit">2. <strong>SfU22 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Analogous regime</th><th>Status of inhibited persons</th><th>ECHR litigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden (post-SfU22)</td><td><em>Uppskjuten verkställighet</em></td><td>No residence status, geographic restrictions, check-ins</td><td>Pending</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td><em>Duldung</em> (tolerated stay)</td><td>No residence status, <em>Aufenthaltsgestattung</em> variant, work restrictions</td><td>Multiple ECtHR rulings; Art. 5 &#x26; 8 tensions</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td><em>Niet-uitzetbaar ongedocumenteerde</em></td><td>No status, some rights restored after litigation</td><td>Multiple high-court losses for state</td></tr><tr><td>🇨🇭 Switzerland</td><td><em>Vorläufige Aufnahme (F)</em></td><td>Temporary residence status, reviewable</td><td>ECHR stable</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td><em>Udrejsecenter</em> (departure centres)</td><td>No status, concentrated residence</td><td>EHRR Akhtar v. Denmark (2023), Art. 5 violation</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>Combination of <em>endelig avslag</em> + non-deport</td><td>No status; sometimes regularised after 10+ years</td><td>Stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden's SfU22 is <strong>closest to Germany's <em>Duldung</em></strong> in legal structure — a no-status limbo with enforcement restrictions. Germany's <em>Duldung</em> regime has generated <strong>at least 12 ECtHR adverse rulings</strong> since 2000, primarily on Article 5 (liberty) and Article 8 (family life) grounds, and has been progressively softened by the Integration Acts. Denmark's <em>udrejsecenter</em> concentrated-residence model (closest to SfU22's geographic-restriction element) <strong>lost at ECHR</strong> in <em>Akhtar v. Denmark</em> (2023). This suggests Sweden's ECHR exposure is structurally predictable — <strong>the question is not whether a challenge succeeds but when</strong>. Switzerland's <em>vorläufige Aufnahme</em> — which <strong>grants temporary status rather than inhibiting removal</strong> — is the opposite-direction peer approach and has been ECHR-stable.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments">3. <strong>KU32/KU33 — Constitutional <em>Vilande</em> Amendments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments">3. <strong>KU32/KU33 — Constitutional <em>Vilande</em> Amendments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6144,7 +6144,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments">3. <strong>KU32/KU33 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Two-Riksdag / two-Parliament rule</th><th align="center">Post-election reaffirmation rate</th><th>Notable failures</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden</td><td><em>Vilande</em> under RF 8:14</td><td align="center">~85% (since 1974)</td><td>1999 EU monetary article lapsed</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>Kiireellinen/normaali järjestys</td><td align="center">~78%</td><td>Several lapses in 1990s</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>Section 121 — two-Storting rule</td><td align="center">~75%</td><td>1983 referendum amendment lapsed</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>§88 — two-Folketing + referendum</td><td align="center">Rare — structurally cold</td><td>§20 EU amendments sometimes fail</td></tr><tr><td>🇮🇸 Iceland</td><td><em>Stjórnskipunarákvæði</em> — two-Althingi</td><td align="center">~70%</td><td>2013 constitution draft lapsed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden's ~85% <em>vilande</em> reaffirmation rate is <strong>high by Nordic standards</strong> — stemming from Sweden's more consensus-oriented constitutional culture and the fact that <em>vilande</em> amendments are typically cross-party from the outset. KU32 (accessibility) fits this pattern; KU33 (digital-seizure access restriction) is <strong>more politically charged</strong> — because it narrows <em>offentlighetsprincipen</em> for mirrored digital evidence — and closer to the type of amendment that historically has the 15% failure rate. The dual-adoption pattern is uncommon — most Nordic <em>vilande</em> are handled one at a time — but is formally valid.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly">4. <strong>TU21 — State e-ID vs Private-Sector Monopoly</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly">4. <strong>TU21 — State e-ID vs Private-Sector Monopoly</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6209,7 +6209,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly">4. <strong>TU21 — St
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>State digital identity</th><th>Private-sector incumbent</th><th align="center">Market share</th><th align="center">Year of state scheme</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden (TU21)</td><td>Planned eIDAS2-compliant wallet</td><td>BankID (banks consortium)</td><td align="center">~95%</td><td align="center">2027+ (proposed)</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>MitID (state-led, public-private)</td><td>NemID → MitID</td><td align="center">~100%</td><td align="center">2021</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>ID-porten / BankID / MinID</td><td>BankID (banks)</td><td align="center">~75% BankID / ~25% state</td><td align="center">2008</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td><em>Suomi.fi-tunnistus</em></td><td>TUPAS (bank-based)</td><td align="center">~60% state / ~40% bank</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>eID-Funktion / <em>Online-Ausweis</em></td><td>None; citizen ID card state-issued</td><td align="center">~60% (opt-in low)</td><td align="center">2010</td></tr><tr><td>🇪🇪 Estonia</td><td>e-Residency / national ID</td><td>None; state monopoly</td><td align="center">~100%</td><td align="center">2002</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>DigiD</td><td>Mixed</td><td align="center">~90% DigiD</td><td align="center">2003</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden is the <strong>last major Nordic country</strong> to launch a state digital identity. Denmark (MitID, 2021) is the most recent analogue and is considered the EU gold standard post-rollout. Norway has operated a <strong>dual-track</strong> state+bank model since 2008 with no market failure. Sweden's late entry is a consequence of BankID's exceptional penetration (~95%) — a unique European case of private-sector near-monopoly in digital identity. TU21 aligns Sweden with <strong>Nordic mainstream practice</strong>, albeit 5–19 years later than neighbours.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--summary-alignment-map">📊 Summary Alignment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--summary-alignment-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-alignment-map">📊 Summary Alignment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-alignment-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "Sweden 2026-04-21"
     FiU48[FiU48 fuel-tax cut]
@@ -6233,7 +6233,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--summary-alignment-map">📊 Summary Alignment Map<a class="" aria-hi
     style SfU22 fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style O1 fill:#cc3300,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Comparative Framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Comparative Framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6271,7 +6271,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Compa
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Sweden follows the German 2022 <em>Tankrabatt</em> template — which Germany did not extend"</td><td>§1 table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"SfU22 aligns Sweden with Germany's <em>Duldung</em> and Denmark's <em>udrejsecenter</em> — both with ECHR adverse rulings"</td><td>§2 table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"State e-ID makes Sweden the last Nordic country to offer a public digital identity — 5 years behind Denmark, 19 behind Norway"</td><td>§4 table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Constitutional <em>vilande</em> reaffirmation succeeds ~85% of the time in Sweden — high by Nordic standards"</td><td>§3 data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Cutting fuel tax to the EU Energy Tax Directive floor moves Sweden from 95th percentile to absolute minimum — a category change"</td><td>§1 text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--comparative-framings-to-avoid">❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--comparative-framings-to-avoid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framings-to-avoid">❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framings-to-avoid"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Sweden is unique in cutting fuel tax" — 6 peer precedents 2022 alone</li>
 <li>❌ "SfU22 is harsher than other European countries" — structurally similar to German <em>Duldung</em>, less restrictive than Danish <em>udrejsecenter</em></li>
@@ -6281,11 +6281,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--comparative-framings-to-avoid">❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid<a c
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Peer data validated against OECD, ECRE, and ECtHR case databases.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-21 15:10 UTC | <strong>Data Depth</strong>: SUMMARY + FULL TEXT for top 8</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6473,7 +6473,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Betänkande</th><th>Title (EN short)</th><th>Committee</th><th>Domain</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>2025/26:FiU48</td><td>Supplementary budget — fuel tax cut + energy relief (4.1B SEK)</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal / Energy</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>2025/26:SfU22</td><td>Inhibition of enforcement (migration)</td><td>SfU</td><td>Migration / Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>2025/26:KU32</td><td>Accessibility requirements — press-freedom media (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td>KU</td><td>Constitutional / Media</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>2025/26:KU33</td><td>Digital seizure transparency (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td>KU</td><td>Constitutional / Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>2025/26:TU21</td><td>State e-identification (eIDAS2)</td><td>TU</td><td>Digital / EU</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>2025/26:MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionen — agriculture climate transition</td><td>MJU</td><td>Climate / Agriculture</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>2025/26:MJU19</td><td>Waste legislation reform</td><td>MJU</td><td>Environment / EU</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>2025/26:MJU20</td><td>Riksrevisionen — climate policy framework</td><td>MJU</td><td>Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>2025/26:CU28</td><td>National housing register (bostadsrätter)</td><td>CU</td><td>Housing / Property</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>2025/26:CU27</td><td>Identity requirements — property registration (<em>lagfart</em>)</td><td>CU</td><td>Property / Anti-crime</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>2025/26:SkU23</td><td>Permanent tax exemption — EV charging electricity</td><td>SkU</td><td>Green taxation</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td>2025/26:KU42</td><td>Division into expenditure areas (<em>utgiftsområden</em>)</td><td>KU</td><td>Budget / Constitutional</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>2025/26:SfU20</td><td>Removed notification requirement — parental benefit</td><td>SfU</td><td>Social insurance</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD01TU22</td><td>2025/26:TU22</td><td>Tachograph enforcement (EU)</td><td>TU</td><td>Transport / EU</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD01KU43</td><td>2025/26:KU43</td><td>New law on the Riksdag medal</td><td>KU</td><td>Parliamentary admin</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟢 ROUTINE</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td>2025/26:TU16</td><td>Removed requirement for introductory driver-training</td><td>TU</td><td>Transport / Road safety</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD01TU19</td><td>2025/26:TU19</td><td>Municipal port security (NATO context)</td><td>TU</td><td>Defense / Ports</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
     "Fiscal / Energy" : 1
     "Migration / Justice" : 1
@@ -6485,7 +6485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domai
     "Transport / Defense" : 2
     "Parliamentary admin" : 1
     "Social insurance" : 1</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-committee">📊 Classification by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-committee"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-committee">📊 Classification by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-committee"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6532,7 +6532,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-committee">📊 Classification by Committee<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Committee</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Most significant</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU</strong> (Finance)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01FiU48 ⭐</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SfU</strong> (Social Insurance / Migration)</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01SfU22 ⭐</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU</strong> (Constitution)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33 (dual <em>vilande</em>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TU</strong> (Transport)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD01TU21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MJU</strong> (Environment / Agriculture)</td><td align="center">3</td><td>HD01MJU21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>CU</strong> (Civil Affairs / Housing)</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01CU28</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SkU</strong> (Taxation)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01SkU23</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity--urgency-distribution">📊 Sensitivity &#x26; Urgency Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity--urgency-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity--urgency-distribution">📊 Sensitivity &#x26; Urgency Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity--urgency-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6561,7 +6561,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity--urgency-distribution">📊 Sensitivity &#x26; Urgency D
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center"></th><th align="center">🔴 CRITICAL</th><th align="center">🟠 URGENT</th><th align="center">🟡 STANDARD</th><th align="center">🟢 ROUTINE</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td align="center">1 (FiU48)</td><td align="center">3 (KU32, KU33, TU21)</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1 (KU43)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td align="center">1 (SfU22)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (TU19)</td><td align="center">0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-rules-applied">🧭 Classification Rules Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-rules-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-rules-applied">🧭 Classification Rules Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-rules-applied"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CRITICAL urgency</strong>: Implementation &#x3C; 60 days OR >2B SEK fiscal impact OR ECHR exposure</li>
 <li><strong>URGENT</strong>: Implementation &#x3C; 12 months OR constitutional <em>vilande</em> status OR EU Commission deadline</li>
@@ -6570,7 +6570,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-rules-applied">🧭 Classification Rules Applied<a cl
 <li><strong>SENSITIVE</strong> sensitivity: Involves individual-rights restriction (SfU22) or national-security context (TU19)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-documents-in-this-dossier">🔗 Related Documents in This Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-documents-in-this-dossier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-in-this-dossier">🔗 Related Documents in This Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-in-this-dossier"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — 5-dimension scoring (electoral/constitutional/EU/immediacy/controversy)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> — inter-document + related motions/propositions</li>
@@ -6579,11 +6579,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-documents-in-this-dossier">🔗 Related Documents in This Do
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — All 17 documents mapped from official <em>riksdagen.se</em> document metadata + committee handling cards.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Trace legislative lineage (proposition → remiss → betänkande → motion → beslut) and identify thematic convergence across committees.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages">🧬 Proposition → Betänkande Chain (primary linkages)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages">🧬 Proposition → Betänkande Chain (primary linkages)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6669,7 +6669,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages">🧬 Proposition 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Betänkande</th><th>Upstream proposition / skrivelse</th><th>Parallel motions</th><th>Downstream vote</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:220 (extra ändringsbudget för 2026)</td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024098 (MP) — <em>counter-motions</em></td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-23</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:214 (inhibition av verkställighet)</td><td>HD02... (V), HD02... (MP) <em>pending</em></td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-29</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:109 (<em>vilande grundlagsändring</em>)</td><td>—</td><td>Post-election Riksdag (Sept 2026 +)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:110 (<em>vilande grundlagsändring</em>)</td><td>—</td><td>Post-election Riksdag (Sept 2026 +)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU21</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:181 (Statlig e-legitimation)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01MJU21</strong></td><td>Skr. 2025/26:95 (Riksrevisionen)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01MJU19</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:165 (avfallslagstiftningen)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU28</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:137 (bostadsrättsregister)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU27</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:138 (identitetskrav lagfart)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SkU23</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:155 (laddel)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU16</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:118 (introduktionsutbildning MC)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU22</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:172 (färdskrivare)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-22</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-thematic-cross-linkages">🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-thematic-cross-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-linkages">🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-linkages"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     subgraph "🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Cluster"
     FiU48[HD01FiU48\nFuel &#x26; energy relief]
@@ -6711,10 +6711,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-thematic-cross-linkages">🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages<a class=
     style KU33 fill:#8844ff,color:#fff
     style TU21 fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-cross-references-narrative">🔗 Key Cross-References (Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-cross-references-narrative"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction">1. <strong>FiU48 ↔ MJU20/MJU21 — The Climate-Fiscal Contradiction</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-cross-references-narrative">🔗 Key Cross-References (Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-cross-references-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction">1. <strong>FiU48 ↔ MJU20/MJU21 — The Climate-Fiscal Contradiction</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction"></a></h4>
 <p>FiU48 cuts fuel tax to the EU Energy Tax Directive <strong>floor</strong> (the lowest rate permitted). The SAME week, MJU20 (Riksrevisionen audit of the Climate Policy Framework) and MJU21 (agricultural emissions audit) are adopted. This produces an <strong>internal contradiction visible in the journal-of-record</strong>: the government formally accepts Riksrevisionen's findings on climate-framework shortfalls while simultaneously cutting the most carbon-relevant consumption tax. Expect this juxtaposition in Klimatpolitiska rådet's Q3 2026 memo and in Greens/Centre opposition framings.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle">2. <strong>SfU22 ↔ TU19 ↔ CU27 — Enforcement-Identity-Border Triangle</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle">2. <strong>SfU22 ↔ TU19 ↔ CU27 — Enforcement-Identity-Border Triangle</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle"></a></h4>
 <p>Three seemingly unrelated reports share an underlying enforcement-architecture logic:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SfU22</strong> creates a geographic-restriction regime for inhibited aliens (internal enforcement)</li>
@@ -6722,14 +6722,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle">2. <strong
 <li><strong>CU27</strong> requires tightened identity verification for property registration (financial enforcement)
 Together they represent a <strong>state-capacity build-out</strong> in identity, mobility, and border control. This is the <em>operational</em> expression of the Tidöavtal's security chapter.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap">3. <strong>KU32 ↔ KU33 — The Dual <em>Vilande</em> Trap</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap">3. <strong>KU32 ↔ KU33 — The Dual <em>Vilande</em> Trap</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap"></a></h4>
 <p>Both amendments are <em>vilande</em> constitutional amendments under Regeringsformen 8:14 — they lapse unless the <strong>next Riksdag</strong> passes them again in <strong>identical wording</strong>. Adopted together, they function as a <strong>two-sided handover brief</strong>: the incoming government cannot reverse them as ordinary law, and failure to re-affirm is politically costly (forces explicit rejection of disability accessibility in the case of KU32, or press-freedom alignment in the case of KU33). See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> for game-theoretic treatment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack">4. <strong>TU21 ↔ CU28 — The Digital-ID Stack</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack">4. <strong>TU21 ↔ CU28 — The Digital-ID Stack</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack"></a></h4>
 <p>State e-ID (TU21) + national housing register (CU28) together form a <strong>digital-administrative stack</strong> that will reshape how Swedes interact with public services 2026–2029. The digital housing register requires a trusted identity layer; state e-ID provides that layer without BankID's commercial contract. Together they displace €400M+ in annual private-sector workflow intermediation — a market that Swedish banks and proptech have controlled for a decade.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17">5. <strong>FiU48 ↔ HD024082/HD024098 (Motions of 2026-04-17)</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17">5. <strong>FiU48 ↔ HD024082/HD024098 (Motions of 2026-04-17)</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p>The S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) counter-motions on fuel tax were already filed during the prior motions cycle (14–17 April 2026, see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>../motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a>). FiU48's committee adoption on 2026-04-21 is the <strong>government's procedural reply</strong>: the committee majority rejected both counter-motions and advanced the government proposal. This compresses the motion-to-vote cycle to <strong>4 parliamentary days</strong> — the fastest cycle since the 2022 energy-crisis emergency budget.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--external-legislative-linkages">🌍 External Legislative Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--external-legislative-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-legislative-linkages">🌍 External Legislative Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-legislative-linkages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6777,7 +6777,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--external-legislative-linkages">🌍 External Legislative Linkages<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Betänkande</th><th>EU instrument / international</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Energy Tax Directive 2003/96/EC</td><td>Compliance at floor</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>ECHR Protocol 4 Art. 2, Art. 5</td><td>Pending legal challenge</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>eIDAS2 Regulation (EU) 2024/1183</td><td>Deadline 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU22</td><td>Tachograph Regulation (EU) 2020/1054</td><td>In compliance, enforcement gap</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>EU Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC</td><td>Aligns</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>CAP Regulation (EU) 2021/2115</td><td>Eco-scheme underperformance</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>CRPD (UN Convention Rights of Persons with Disabilities)</td><td>Strengthens Art. 9 compliance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier">🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026 Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier">🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026 Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6806,7 +6806,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier">🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cycle</th><th>Relation to 2026-04-21 committee reports</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-14 → 04-17 motions</strong></td><td>Counter-motions to FiU48 cluster; 4-party immigration opposition to SfU22 lineage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-21 interpellations</strong></td><td>Ministerial accountability on SfU22 enforcement + FiU48 fiscal pathway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-14 propositions</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:220 → direct ancestor of HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-03-20 → 04-10 committee reports</strong></td><td>KU32/KU33 rapporteur drafts; FiU48 Lagrådet timeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../motions/cross-reference-map.md</code></a> for the reciprocal view.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lineage-confidence">🔎 Lineage Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lineage-confidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lineage-confidence">🔎 Lineage Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lineage-confidence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>FiU48 → Prop. 220</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (explicit in betänkande)</li>
 <li><strong>SfU22 → Prop. 214</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (explicit)</li>
@@ -6817,11 +6817,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--lineage-confidence">🔎 Lineage Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-28 (after kammaren votes on FiU48 + SfU22)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Methodology Reflection, transparently report method, data depth, confidence calibration, known gaps, and deviation rationale.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--methodologies-applied">🧭 Methodologies Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--methodologies-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodologies-applied">🧭 Methodologies Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodologies-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6863,7 +6863,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--methodologies-applied">🧭 Methodologies Applied<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology guide</th><th>Applied in</th><th>Version consulted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a></td><td>All outputs — quality gates, evidence density, data-depth confidence ceiling</td><td>v5.0</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md"><code>political-classification-guide.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></td><td>v2.3</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md"><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td><td>v2.2</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md"><code>political-threat-framework.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> — <strong>Political Threat Taxonomy + Attack Trees + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + ICO</strong></td><td>v3.2</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md"><code>political-swot-framework.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></td><td>v2.3</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-style-guide.md"><code>political-style-guide.md</code></a></td><td>All outputs — intelligence-grade writing + evidence density + cui bono</td><td>v2.2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-templates-applied">Templates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-templates-applied"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-templates-applied">Templates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-templates-applied"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6907,7 +6907,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-templates-applied">Templates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Template</th><th>Applied in</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/per-file-political-intelligence.md"><code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code></a></td><td><code>documents/HD01*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/political-classification.md"><code>political-classification.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md"><code>stakeholder-impact.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-depth--confidence-calibration">📊 Data Depth &#x26; Confidence Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-depth--confidence-calibration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-depth--confidence-calibration">📊 Data Depth &#x26; Confidence Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-depth--confidence-calibration"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Data Availability Prerequisites:</p>
 
 
@@ -6969,10 +6969,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-depth--confidence-calibration">📊 Data Depth &#x26; Confidenc
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th align="center">Data depth</th><th align="center">Permitted confidence ceiling</th><th align="center">Confidence used</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td align="center">SUMMARY</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19–21</td><td align="center">SUMMARY</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27, CU28</td><td align="center">SUMMARY</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16, TU22, SkU23, SfU20, KU42, KU43, TU19</td><td align="center">METADATA-ONLY</td><td align="center">LOW / VERY LOW</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance">Confidence-Ceiling Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance">Confidence-Ceiling Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance"></a></h4>
 <p>No analysis in this batch exceeds its permitted confidence ceiling. Per-document analyses for METADATA-ONLY documents carry explicit <code>Confidence: LOW</code> labels.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd">✅ Quality-Gate Compliance (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd">✅ Quality-Gate Compliance (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7035,7 +7035,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd">✅ Quality-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gate</th><th>Requirement</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Evidence density — per-file</td><td>≥3 evidence points, ≥2 dok_id citations, ≥2 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence density — synthesis</td><td>≥10 evidence points, ≥5 dok_id, ≥5 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence density — risk</td><td>≥5 points, ≥3 dok_id, ≥3 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence density — threat</td><td>≥6 points, ≥3 dok_id, ≥3 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Mermaid diagrams</td><td>≥1 per major output</td><td align="center">✅ (all top-level files)</td></tr><tr><td>No STRIDE usage</td><td>Replaced with Political Threat Taxonomy</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Anti-pattern check</td><td>No "No strengths identified", no generic boilerplate, no title-as-finding</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labelling</td><td>Every major claim has 🟩 / 🟨 / 🟥 label</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-methodology linkage</td><td>Threat ↔ Risk ↔ SWOT ↔ Scenario links in place</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Depth indicators</td><td>≥3 of 5 (cui bono, second-order, historical, counter-factual, tension)</td><td align="center">✅ (all 5 used)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-known-gaps">🕳️ Known Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-known-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-known-gaps">🕳️ Known Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-gaps"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Vote records not yet available</strong> — Kammaren floor votes for this batch are scheduled 2026-04-22 / 04-23 / 04-24 / 04-28 / 04-29. Coalition-mathematics projections rely on committee-stage positions + historical analogues. Post-vote reconciliation needed 2026-04-30.</p>
@@ -7057,14 +7057,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-known-gaps">🕳️ Known Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--method-deviations">🧪 Method Deviations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--method-deviations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-method-deviations">🧪 Method Deviations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-method-deviations"></a></h3>
 <p>None material. Specifically:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Threat analysis explicitly <strong>does not use STRIDE</strong> per <code>political-threat-framework.md</code> §Purpose ("This framework deliberately avoids STRIDE"). A prior version of this file (commit <code>0ae623d</code>) used STRIDE; it has been rewritten in this run to comply.</li>
 <li>All scenario probabilities use Bayesian framing per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> rather than point-estimate only.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--iterative-improvement-log">🔁 Iterative Improvement Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--iterative-improvement-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-iterative-improvement-log">🔁 Iterative Improvement Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-iterative-improvement-log"></a></h3>
 <p>Per the project's <strong>AI FIRST</strong> principle (never accept first-pass quality), the following improvement passes were performed in this run:</p>
 
 
@@ -7118,7 +7118,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--iterative-improvement-log">🔁 Iterative Improvement Log<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Pass</th><th>Focus</th><th>Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Inventory existing artifacts</td><td>Identified 8 missing top-level files + 5 missing per-document analyses + 1 non-compliant threat analysis</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Methodology consult</td><td>Read <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>, <code>political-threat-framework.md</code>, <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code>, <code>political-swot-framework.md</code>, <code>political-classification-guide.md</code>, <code>political-style-guide.md</code>, <code>templates/README.md</code>, <code>templates/per-file-political-intelligence.md</code>, <code>templates/threat-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Create missing top-level (5)</td><td>executive-brief, classification-results, cross-reference-map, coalition-mathematics, comparative-international</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Rewrite threat-analysis (compliance)</td><td>Replaced STRIDE with Political Threat Taxonomy + Attack Trees + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + ICO</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Create remaining top-level (3)</td><td>historical-baseline, scenario-analysis, methodology-reflection (this file)</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Per-document depth (5)</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD01TU16 analyses</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Article linkage</td><td>EN + SV articles updated with clickable links to every artifact</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Quality review</td><td>This document</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity">🧩 Cross-Check Against Motions Dossier Parity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity">🧩 Cross-Check Against Motions Dossier Parity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity"></a></h3>
 <p>The motions cycle for the prior week (2026-04-14 → 04-17) produced 18 analysis files. This committee-reports cycle now produces 20 analysis files (17 top-level + per-document):</p>
 
 
@@ -7242,7 +7242,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity">🧩 Cross-Check Against
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th align="center">motions/</th><th align="center">committeeReports/ (before)</th><th align="center">committeeReports/ (this run)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>executive-brief.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>classification-results.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>cross-reference-map.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>coalition-mathematics.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>comparative-international.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>historical-baseline.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>methodology-reflection.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>synthesis-summary.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅ (carried forward)</td></tr><tr><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅ (STRIDE)</td><td align="center">✅ (rewritten compliant)</td></tr><tr><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>election-2026-implications.md</td><td align="center">n/a</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>economic-data.json</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>data-download-manifest.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>README.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">(future work)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Parity status</strong>: ACHIEVED for all mandatory analysis dimensions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lessons-for-future-cycles">🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lessons-for-future-cycles"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-for-future-cycles">🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-for-future-cycles"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Do not allow a news-articles run to begin before the analysis parity check</strong> — this cycle's issue originated in a prior "Analysis Only" run that produced only 10 files instead of the full 18-file set.</p>
@@ -7260,7 +7260,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lessons-for-future-cycles">🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles<a class=""
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH on method compliance; 🟨 MEDIUM on forward-looking claims.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 15:36 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_betankanden, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Scope of this file</strong>: raw data downloaded by the <strong>data-only downloader</strong>. This is <strong>not</strong> the analysis-selection set. The full analysis dossier in this directory covers a broader <strong>14-report week package</strong> that includes reports adopted 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-21 as surfaced by the news-committee-reports workflow; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a> for the complete analysis set.
@@ -7280,7 +7280,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 the preceding committee week. Both selections are intentional; they serve different
 pipeline stages.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -7290,16 +7290,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md"><code>election-2026-implications.md</code></a></em></p>
+<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications-7">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-7"></a></h2>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports | <strong>Framework</strong>: v5.0 Election Lens<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:45 UTC — HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget) added as primary electoral document</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview-1">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview-2">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-2"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 2026 committee reports batch arrives with approximately 5 months until Sweden's general election (September 14, 2026). An extraordinary supplementary budget with fuel tax relief and energy price support now sits alongside the migration enforcement reform as co-leading electoral stories — together they define the government's strategic bet for the final campaign stretch.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-matrix">Electoral Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-matrix">Electoral Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "Tier 1 — Very High Electoral Impact"
     FiU48["FiU48: Fuel tax cut + energy relief\n🟦 VERY HIGH — 5.7M drivers affected"]
@@ -7327,8 +7327,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-matrix">Electoral Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
     style MJU21 fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style Others fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment">Document-by-Document Electoral Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment">Document-by-Document Electoral Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟦VERY HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH — This is the most direct voter benefit in the April 2026 batch. The fuel tax cut of 82 öre/liter for petrol and 319 SEK/m³ for diesel (May 1 – September 30) will be felt at every Swedish petrol station. With approximately 5.7 million licensed drivers and Sweden's relatively high commute-by-car rates in rural and suburban areas, this measure disproportionately benefits the government's suburban and rural voter bases.</p>
 <p><strong>The numbers</strong>: Based on average Swedish petrol consumption of ~40 liters/month for a family car, a typical driver saves approximately 33 SEK/month on fuel, or 165 SEK over May-September. Diesel-heavy users (tradespeople, truck operators) see larger absolute savings. The electricity/gas price support covers January-February 2026 heating bills — adding direct household relief for the winter period.</p>
@@ -7347,7 +7347,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief">H
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong>: If fuel relief extends beyond September 2026, Sweden falls into a structural low-fossil-fuel-tax regime that undermines climate policy for years.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten">HD01SfU22 — Inhibition av verkställigheten<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten">HD01SfU22 — Inhibition av verkställigheten<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH — Migration is consistently Sweden's #2 voter concern (after economy). The inhibition reform directly replaces a humanitarian protection mechanism with a surveillance-enforcement mechanism. SD will campaign: "We delivered — no more residence through the back door." S will counter: "A cruel system that abandons people in legal limbo."</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong>:</p>
@@ -7364,24 +7364,24 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten">HD01SfU22 — Inhibition
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong>: If upheld legally, becomes permanent architecture change; future S-led government inherits enforcement machinery.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande">HD01KU32/KU33 — Constitutional Amendments (vilande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande">HD01KU32/KU33 — Constitutional Amendments (vilande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (constitutional mechanics well-established)</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: MEDIUM but constitutionally unique — Both amendments are adopted "vilande" (pending), meaning the <strong>next</strong> Riksdag after the September 2026 election must re-affirm identical wording. This creates an extraordinary situation: the September 2026 election result directly determines whether KU32 (accessibility requirements for protected media) and KU33 (digital seizure not classified as public records) become law in 2027.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Stakes</strong>: Parties cannot simply reverse these changes — they need to explicitly campaign against re-affirmation. Opposition (S, V, MP) could campaign against KU33 if they view it as restricting press freedom transparency in criminal investigations.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation">HD01TU21 — En statlig e-legitimation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation">HD01TU21 — En statlig e-legitimation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: MEDIUM — Not a hot-button issue, but digital inclusion resonates with elderly voters (≈22% of electorate) and immigrant communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong>: Rare cross-party consensus item; all parties can claim credit.</p>
 <p><strong>Campaign Use</strong>: Government can highlight as "modernizing Sweden's digital infrastructure" — positive legacy.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: MEDIUM — Sensitive for C-party rural voter base. Green voters (MP, V) want stronger action; farmers (C/SD rural) fear binding conditions.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Risk</strong>: C-party may distance from government if binding agricultural conditions perceived as hostile to farming communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Agricultural Sweden in numbers</strong>: 66,000 active farms; 180,000 employed in agriculture; 13% of national GHG emissions; €1.2B annual CAP receipts.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment">Composite Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment">Composite Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7425,7 +7425,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment">Composite Electoral Risk Assessm
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Theme</th><th>Risk for Coalition</th><th>Risk for Opposition</th><th>Net Effect</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal relief (FiU48)</td><td>"Populist" label risk; budget impact</td><td>Can't easily oppose — damages working-class appeal</td><td>Strong net positive for coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Migration enforcement (SfU22)</td><td>ECHR failure = HIGH risk</td><td>"Too cruel" = MEDIUM risk</td><td>Favors coalition if implemented cleanly</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional lock-in (KU32, KU33)</td><td>LOW — cross-party majority</td><td>LOW</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>Digital modernization (TU21)</td><td>LOW — cross-party support</td><td>LOW</td><td>Neutral or slightly positive</td></tr><tr><td>Agriculture climate (MJU21)</td><td>MEDIUM — rural voter sensitivity</td><td>MEDIUM — climate ambition insufficient</td><td>Political stalemate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election">Key Strategic Indicators (Track Before Sept 2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election">Key Strategic Indicators (Track Before Sept 2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Petrol price polling</strong> — does FiU48 register as "government helped with cost of living"? (CRITICAL for election narrative)</li>
 <li><strong>Migration Court of Appeal ruling</strong> on first SfU22 inhibition order (expected Q3 2026) — CRITICAL</li>
@@ -7436,12 +7436,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election">Key Strateg
 <li><strong>September 2026 budget debate</strong> — will fuel relief be extended or reversed?</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-baseline"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>, every significance claim requires comparative grounding. This document anchors the 2026-04-21 package against twelve prior spring committee weeks to answer: <strong>is this cycle ordinary, elevated, or historically anomalous?</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026">📊 Spring Committee-Week Baselines 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026">📊 Spring Committee-Week Baselines 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026"></a></h3>
 <p>Indexed to mid-April committee weeks (~T-20 weeks to mid-term, ~T-20 weeks before general elections in election years).</p>
 
 
@@ -7577,12 +7577,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026">📊 Spring Committee-Week
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Year</th><th>Riksmöte</th><th align="center">Reports adopted</th><th align="center">Top-story significance</th><th align="center">Fiscal emergency</th><th align="center">Constitutional <em>vilande</em></th><th align="center">Pre-election?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013/14</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">18/25 — Gender-equality labour reform</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">1 (inheritance)</td><td align="center">✅ Yes</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>2014/15</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">16/25 — Migration dialogue</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>2015/16</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">20/25 — Refugee crisis response package</td><td align="center">Yes (+3.2B SEK)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>2016/17</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">17/25 — Industrial policy</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">1 (<em>vilande</em> press freedom)</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>2017/18</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">19/25 — Pension reform + A-kassa</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ Yes</td></tr><tr><td>2019</td><td>2018/19</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">14/25 — Budget transition</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2020</td><td>2019/20</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">21/25 — COVID emergency measures</td><td align="center">Yes (+12B SEK)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2021</td><td>2020/21</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">19/25 — Post-pandemic recovery</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2022</td><td>2021/22</td><td align="center">17</td><td align="center">22/25 — Energy-crisis subsidies (HögElPris)</td><td align="center">Yes (+6.0B SEK)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ Yes</td></tr><tr><td>2023</td><td>2022/23</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">18/25 — Tidöavtal first-wave bills</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2024</td><td>2023/24</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">17/25 — NATO implementation</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">1 (territorial integrity)</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2025</td><td>2024/25</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">18/25 — Energy security + digital ID precursor</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026</strong></td><td><strong>2025/26</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>14</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>22/25 — FiU48 fuel/energy + SfU22 migration (tied)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Yes (+4.1B SEK)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>2 (KU32 + KU33)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ <strong>Yes</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Data sourced from riksdagen.se <em>riksdagsprotokoll</em> archive and verified against committee secretariat year-in-review briefings.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context">🔎 Position of 2026-04-21 in Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025">1. <strong>Volume is average</strong> (14 reports vs 13.4 mean 2014–2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context">🔎 Position of 2026-04-21 in Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025">1. <strong>Volume is average</strong> (14 reports vs 13.4 mean 2014–2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025"></a></h4>
 <p>The report count itself is unremarkable. The concentration at the top of the significance matrix is not.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225">2. <strong>Top-story significance is tied for highest since 2014</strong> (22/25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225">2. <strong>Top-story significance is tied for highest since 2014</strong> (22/25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225"></a></h4>
 <p>Equals only 2022 (HögElPris energy-crisis subsidies during the Russian energy shock). 2022 and 2026 are the <strong>only two spring cycles</strong> to combine a <strong>>2B SEK supplementary budget with a pre-election timing window ≤5 months</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented">3. <strong>Triple-pillar convergence is unprecedented</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented">3. <strong>Triple-pillar convergence is unprecedented</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented"></a></h4>
 <p>No prior spring cycle 2014–2025 contains all three of:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Election-year supplementary budget (>2B SEK) ✅ FiU48</li>
@@ -7590,7 +7590,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented">3. <strong>Triple-pilla
 <li>Dual <em>vilande</em> constitutional amendments ✅ KU32 + KU33</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The closest precedents each feature <strong>one</strong> of these: 2022 (supplementary budget only), 2017 (single <em>vilande</em> only), 2023 (enforcement flagship only without fiscal).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed">4. <strong>The fiscal-then-election interval is extraordinarily compressed</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed">4. <strong>The fiscal-then-election interval is extraordinarily compressed</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7628,10 +7628,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed">4.
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Year</th><th align="center">Supplementary budget size</th><th align="center">Months to election</th><th align="center">Structural continuation?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2016</td><td align="center">3.2B SEK</td><td align="center">Non-election</td><td align="center">N/A</td></tr><tr><td>2020</td><td align="center">12.0B SEK</td><td align="center">Non-election</td><td align="center">Yes (pandemic)</td></tr><tr><td>2022</td><td align="center">6.0B SEK</td><td align="center">6 months to Sept 2022 election</td><td align="center">Partial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>4.1B SEK</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≤5 months to 14 Sept 2026</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Unknown (sunset 30 Sept)</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>The 4.1B SEK FiU48 package matures (sunsets) <strong>14 days after</strong> the election — a structural feature absent from every comparable precedent. This is the <strong>single most politically compressed fiscal cycle of the 2014–2026 era</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare">5. <strong><em>Vilande</em> amendment dual-adoption is rare</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare">5. <strong><em>Vilande</em> amendment dual-adoption is rare</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare"></a></h4>
 <p>Since 1974 (Regeringsformen adoption), only <strong>six</strong> spring committee weeks have adopted two <em>vilande</em> amendments simultaneously: 1979, 1988, 1998, 2006, 2017, <strong>2026</strong>. The 2017 cycle is the most recent analogue — its two <em>vilande</em> amendments had an 85% and 70% re-affirmation rate respectively.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring">📈 Comparative Series — Coalition Fiscal Activism (Election-Year Spring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring">📈 Comparative Series — Coalition Fiscal Activism (Election-Year Spring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     Y2014["2014 (S-MP oppositionens år)&#x3C;br/>No spring supplementary"]
     Y2018["2018 (S-MP gov)&#x3C;br/>No spring supplementary"]
@@ -7645,7 +7645,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring">
     style Base fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Election-year spring supplementary budgets are <strong>rare but not unprecedented</strong>. The 2022 HögElPris package established the template (exogenous-shock-justified emergency budget during campaign build-up). FiU48 follows the 2022 template but with a <strong>weaker exogenous shock</strong> (Middle East conflict + high Jan–Feb heating costs vs the 2022 Russian gas crisis). This makes the pre-election-fiscal-populism framing <strong>harder to refute</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates">🏛️ Constitutional Baseline — <em>Vilande</em> Re-Affirmation Rates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates">🏛️ Constitutional Baseline — <em>Vilande</em> Re-Affirmation Rates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates"></a></h3>
 <p>Historical re-affirmation outcomes for <em>vilande</em> amendments passing to the next Riksdag after an intervening election:</p>
 
 
@@ -7698,7 +7698,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates">🏛️ Co
 <p>KU32 (media accessibility) fits the "politically consensual" class with expected ≥90% re-affirmation.
 KU33 (digital-seizure access restriction) fits the "politically-charged" class with expected 70–85% re-affirmation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for">🧭 What This Cycle Is <em>Not</em> Precedented For<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for">🧭 What This Cycle Is <em>Not</em> Precedented For<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for"></a></h3>
 <p>Claims that would <em>exceed</em> historical baselines and require additional evidence before publication:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Unprecedented fiscal-political cycle" — overstates: 2022 is comparable</li>
@@ -7707,7 +7707,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for">🧭 What This Cycle Is <em>
 <li>❌ "Most ECHR-exposed migration reform in Swedish history" — 2015–2016 emergency law package was arguably more exposed</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Historical Framings (Verified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Historical Framings (Verified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7745,7 +7745,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified">🎙️ Newsroom-Gra
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Tied for highest-significance spring committee cycle in 12 years"</td><td>§Position table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Only the second election-year spring supplementary budget since 2014"</td><td>§Comparative Series</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Sweden's sixth dual-<em>vilande</em> spring cycle since 1974"</td><td>§Constitutional Baseline</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Fiscal-election interval is the most compressed since 2022 — and narrower because the sunset precedes the election by only 14 days"</td><td>§Position §4</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Historic <em>vilande</em> re-affirmation rate is 84%; KU33 falls in the lower-rate class"</td><td>§Constitutional Baseline</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM (small-n classification)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-analyses-1">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-analyses-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-analyses-1">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-analyses-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a> — synthesised newsroom summary</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> — peer-jurisdiction baselines</li>
@@ -7754,6 +7754,39 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-analyses-1">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH on aggregate counts; 🟨 MEDIUM on top-story significance re-scoring for pre-2020 cycles (retrospective methodology reconstruction).</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md"><code>election-2026-implications.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -7807,7 +7840,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:06.843Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:28.235Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html b/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html
index 790dfaece9..1be9d617a6 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Committee Reports (April 21, 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.220Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:28.619Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.220Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:28.619Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Committee Reports (April 21, 2026)","description":"On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a 14-report package that operationalises a three-pillar electoral bet: fiscal relief (FiU48, 4.1B SEK fuel and energy subsidies), enforcement…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:07.220Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md","name":"election-2026-implications.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Committee Reports (April 21, 2026)","description":"On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a 14-report package that operationalises a three-pillar electoral bet: fiscal relief (FiU48, 4.1B SEK fuel and energy subsidies), enforcement…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:28.619Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-committeeReports-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md","name":"election-2026-implications.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -233,10 +233,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Audience</strong></td><td>Editors-in-chief · political advisors · party whips · newsroom planners · policy analysts</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading time</strong></td><td>3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH (SUMMARY/METADATA + FULL TEXT)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>On 2026-04-21 the Riksdag's committees adopted a <strong>14-report package</strong> that operationalises a <strong>three-pillar electoral bet</strong>: fiscal relief (FiU48, 4.1B SEK fuel and energy subsidies), enforcement credibility (SfU22 migration inhibition), and constitutional legacy (KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em> grundlagsändringar that bind the next Riksdag). The <strong>headline finding</strong> is that this is the <strong>first time since the 2014 decemberöverenskommelse</strong> that a sitting government has coordinated pre-election fiscal, enforcement, and constitutional measures within a single committee week. FiU48 and SfU22 both score <strong>22/25</strong> on the significance matrix; their joint adoption defines the spring 2026 inflection point. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-things-to-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-things-to-know"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>FiU48 is simultaneously an election relief measure AND an EU compliance correction.</strong> Cutting petrol tax by 82 öre/liter and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ brings Sweden to the <strong>EU Energy Tax Directive 2003/96/EC floor</strong> — the lowest rate permitted by Brussels. The 4.1B SEK cost is absorbed as a supplementary budget and expires 30 September 2026 — <strong>14 days after the election</strong>. If the government is re-elected it will face pressure to extend; if the opposition wins it inherits a sunset clause that is politically costly to let lapse.</p>
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidd
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance">📊 Top Five Reports, Ranked by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance">📊 Top Five Reports, Ranked by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-five-reports-ranked-by-significance">📊 Top Five Reports, Rank
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Report</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Committee</th><th>Watch Out For</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🥇 1</td><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel &#x26; energy relief</td><td align="center"><strong>22/25</strong></td><td>FiU</td><td>Extension pressure post-30 Sept 2026; EU Commission infringement on tax-minimum floor</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥇 1</td><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>Migration inhibition reform</td><td align="center"><strong>22/25</strong></td><td>SfU</td><td>FARR test case Q3 2026; Migrationsöverdomstolen preliminary ruling</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 3</td><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Constitutional accessibility amendment (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td align="center"><strong>19/25</strong></td><td>KU</td><td>Post-election re-affirmation; disability &#x26; media lobby mobilisation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 4</td><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Digital seizure transparency (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>KU</td><td>Journalist protection coalition; press freedom framing</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>HD01TU21</strong></td><td>Statlig e-legitimation</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>TU</td><td>BankID consortium lobbying (€200M+ revenue at risk); eIDAS2 deadline</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>HD01MJU21</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen — agricultural climate audit</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>MJU</td><td>C-party rural defection risk; CAP eco-scheme compliance</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>HD01MJU19</strong></td><td>Waste legislation reform</td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td>MJU</td><td>Circular economy directive; municipality implementation capacity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> for the full 15-document matrix.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Proba
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Political outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 BASE — Government retained, FiU48 sunset respected, KU32/33 re-affirmed</td><td align="center"><strong>0.42</strong></td><td>Legacy package holds; minor ECHR amendment to SfU22</td></tr><tr><td>🔵 BULL (government) — S leadership change before election compresses opposition</td><td align="center"><strong>0.12</strong></td><td>FiU48 extended to year-end; KU32/33 uncontested</td></tr><tr><td>🔴 BEAR (government) — S-led minority, FiU48 reversed, KU32/33 partially lapse</td><td align="center"><strong>0.28</strong></td><td>SfU22 ECHR-amended; fuel tax restored Q1 2027</td></tr><tr><td>⚡ WILDCARD — Inconclusive election; technical prime minister</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td><td>All spring-2026 measures enter amendment-by-amendment renegotiation</td></tr><tr><td>🟣 TAIL — Migrationsöverdomstolen strikes SfU22 before election</td><td align="center"><strong>0.08</strong></td><td>Crisis reframes migration debate; Tidöavtal credibility damaged</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-four-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-four-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-four-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-four-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-four-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Four Risks to Monitor Clos
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Why it matters</th><th>Update signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R-FiU48-1</strong> Fossil-fuel subsidy reframe</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>Opposition climate-credibility attack; EU ETS2 narrative collision</td><td>First Novus climate-salience poll post-May 1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-SfU22-1</strong> ECHR challenge succeeds</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Protocol 4 Art. 2 + Art. 5 exposure; strikes Tidöavtal flagship</td><td>FARR filing at Migrationsöverdomstolen (expected ≤Aug 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-FiU48-2</strong> Structural precedent for fuel tax floor</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Climate Policy Framework §5 accountability trigger at Klimatlagen review</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet statement Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R-TU21-BankID</strong> Banking lobby delays state e-ID past 2028 eIDAS2 deadline</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>EU Commission infringement; digital equity gap persists for 1.5M Swedes</td><td>Svenska Bankföreningen position Q2 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> for full ISO 31000 register.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Signal</th><th>What to prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Within 7 days</strong></td><td>Government communications on FiU48 sunset-clause framing</td><td>Campaign-messaging tracker</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Within 14 days</strong></td><td>L-party ECHR posture on SfU22 (backbench dissent watch)</td><td>Coalition-unity score update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>By 1 May 2026</strong></td><td>FiU48 implementation — fuel price ticker at Circle K / OKQ8</td><td>Rural-voter sentiment monitoring</td></tr><tr><td><strong>By 1 June 2026</strong></td><td>SfU22 implementation — first inhibition orders issued</td><td>FARR/Red Cross statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>By 30 Sept 2026</strong></td><td>FiU48 sunset-clause decision (pre-election)</td><td>Post-election coalition brief</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q3 2026</strong></td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen test case filing</td><td>ECHR scenario update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Q3/Q4 2026</strong></td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet FiU48 accountability memo</td><td>Climate-credibility risk update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Post-election</strong></td><td>KU32/KU33 re-affirmation vote</td><td>Constitutional-continuity brief</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Re
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Sweden cuts fuel tax to EU minimum — the floor Brussels allows — 14 days before election"</td><td>FiU48 bill text + EU 2003/96/EC Annex I</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Constitutional amendments pre-commit the next Riksdag"</td><td>KU32/KU33 <em>vilande</em> status + RF 8:14</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"First ECHR stress test of Tidöavtal flagship: migration inhibition vs Protocol 4 Art. 2"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> §T1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"4.1B SEK supplementary budget delivered three weeks before campaign acceleration — fastest fiscal-political cycle since 2014"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a> §1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"State e-ID challenges BankID's de facto monopoly — €200M+ identity-verification market reallocation"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §5</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak or Oversimplified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak or Oversimplified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "FiU48 is a permanent tax cut" — sunset clause 30 Sept 2026; structural continuation requires separate legislation</li>
 <li>❌ "SfU22 deports more people" — it creates a no-status residual cohort, not new removal capacity</li>
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak-or-oversimplified">❌ Framings to
 <li>❌ "Agricultural audit MJU21 is hostile to farmers" — it audits CAP effectiveness, not farmers' practices</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deeper-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deeper-reading"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Cross-document synthesis + mermaid map</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — 5-dimension matrix across 15 documents</li>
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-28</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21<br>
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26<br>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow<br>
@@ -527,13 +527,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-21 14:45 UTC<br>
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (SUMMARY/METADATA + FULL TEXT data)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-story">🎯 Top Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story">🎯 Top Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Government Fires Election-Year Populist Salvo: Fuel Tax Cut and Energy Price Relief</strong></p>
 <p>The single most consequential committee report approved on April 21, 2026 is FiU48 — an extraordinary supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes by 82 öre/liter for petrol and 319 SEK/m³ for diesel from May through September 2026, combined with a one-time electricity and gas price support package for Swedish households. The total budget impact of 4.1 billion SEK in 2026 — weakening state finances by that amount — represents a deliberate election-year gamble: the government cites the Middle East conflict and high January-February 2026 heating costs as justification for emergency measures, but the timing, five months before the general election, signals that economic relief for ordinary Swedes is now the government's primary electoral message. The measure reduces petrol and diesel taxes to the EU energy tax directive's minimum level — the floor allowed by Brussels — making Sweden temporarily one of the lowest-taxed fuel markets in the EU.</p>
 <p><strong>Second major story (ongoing)</strong>: Sweden's Migration Enforcement Shifts Away from Humanitarian Permits</p>
 <p>SfU22 — introducing "inhibition" (uppskjuten verkställighet) to replace temporary residence permits for aliens facing deportation obstacles — represents a fundamental shift in how Sweden treats individuals caught between deportation orders and temporary enforcement barriers. With the June 1, 2026 implementation date approaching, the measure will be one of the clearest migration policy tests before the 2026 election.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-rankings-by-significance">📊 Document Rankings by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-rankings-by-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-rankings-by-significance">📊 Document Rankings by Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-rankings-by-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-rankings-by-significance">📊 Document Rankings by Signifi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Significance</th><th>Domain</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el/gasprisstöd</td><td><strong>10/10</strong></td><td>Fiscal/Energy policy</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Inhibition av verkställigheten</td><td>9/10</td><td>Migration enforcement</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier (grundlagsändring)</td><td>8/10</td><td>Constitutional/Media</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar vid husrannsakan (grundlagsändring)</td><td>7/10</td><td>Constitutional/Rule of law</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen</td><td>7/10</td><td>Environment/Circular economy</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>En statlig e-legitimation</td><td>7/10</td><td>Digital governance</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om klimatpolitiska ramverket</td><td>7/10</td><td>Climate policy</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>7/10</td><td>Agriculture/Climate</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>7/10</td><td>Housing/Property markets</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart</td><td>6/10</td><td>Property/Anti-crime</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>Permanent skattefrihet för laddel</td><td>6/10</td><td>Green taxation</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td>5/10</td><td>Constitutional/Budget</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Slopat krav på anmälan för föräldrapenning</td><td>5/10</td><td>Social insurance</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD01KU43</td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td><td>2/10</td><td>Parliamentary admin</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-committee-activity-overview">🏛️ Committee Activity Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-committee-activity-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-activity-overview">🏛️ Committee Activity Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-activity-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     subgraph "Committee Reports — April 2026"
     FiU["FiU: FISCAL EMERGENCY\n(HD01FiU48 — CRITICAL)\nFuel tax + energy relief 4.1B SEK"]
@@ -672,21 +672,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-committee-activity-overview">🏛️ Committee Activity Overview<
     style SkU fill:#888888,color:#fff
     style SfU2 fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-themes-this-cycle">🔑 Key Themes This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-themes-this-cycle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story">1. 🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Relief (HD01FiU48) — TOP STORY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-themes-this-cycle">🔑 Key Themes This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-themes-this-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story">1. 🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Relief (HD01FiU48) — TOP STORY<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--election-year-fiscal-relief-hd01fiu48--top-story"></a></h4>
 <p>The supplementary budget is the government's most significant economic intervention since the 2022 energy crisis support packages. Fuel tax reduction to EU minimum levels (petrol: 82 öre/liter cut; diesel: 319 SEK/m³ cut) across May-September 2026 will benefit every Swedish driver — approximately 5.7 million licensed drivers and 4.8 million registered vehicles. The el- och gasprisstöd (electricity and gas price support) reimburses January-February 2026 heating costs. Total cost: 4.1 billion SEK. The government's justification — Middle East conflict and high winter heating bills — is technically accurate but politically transparent: this is relief timed to coincide with the final campaign buildup period before September 14, 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22">2. 🔴 Migration Enforcement Tightening (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22">2. 🔴 Migration Enforcement Tightening (HD01SfU22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2--migration-enforcement-tightening-hd01sfu22"></a></h4>
 <p>The inhibition reform closes the temporary-permit pathway while extending deportation enforcement machinery. This is the government's most direct operationalization of its Tidöavtal migration commitments. Risk: ECHR exposure; Opportunity: electoral reward from enforcement-focused voters.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33">3. 🟣 Dual Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU32, HD01KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33">3. 🟣 Dual Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU32, HD01KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--dual-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku32-hd01ku33"></a></h4>
 <p>Two constitution-level changes adopted as "vilande" (pending) requiring re-affirmation after the September 2026 election. KU32 expands accessibility requirements applicable to press-freedom-protected media; KU33 restricts public access to digitally seized materials in criminal investigations. Both require the post-election Riksdag to pass identical wording — binding the next government to these changes regardless of who wins.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21">4. 🔵 Digital Infrastructure Modernization (HD01TU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21">4. 🔵 Digital Infrastructure Modernization (HD01TU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--digital-infrastructure-modernization-hd01tu21"></a></h4>
 <p>The state e-ID proposal moves Sweden toward eIDAS2 compliance and challenges BankID's near-monopoly. Cross-party support likely; implementation timeline 2027-2028. Digital equity benefit for 15-20% of Swedes lacking BankID access.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21">5. 🟢 Agricultural &#x26; Climate Accountability (HD01MJU19, MJU20, MJU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21">5. 🟢 Agricultural &#x26; Climate Accountability (HD01MJU19, MJU20, MJU21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--agricultural--climate-accountability-hd01mju19-mju20-mju21"></a></h4>
 <p>Three MJU-related reports this cycle: waste legislation reform (circular economy), Riksrevisionen audit of climate policy framework effectiveness, and agricultural emissions audit. Together these constitute the most comprehensive environmental accountability package of the 2025/26 session.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28">6. 🏠 Housing &#x26; Property Market Reforms (HD01CU27, CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28">6. 🏠 Housing &#x26; Property Market Reforms (HD01CU27, CU28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--housing--property-market-reforms-hd01cu27-cu28"></a></h4>
 <p>Two civil law reforms: a national housing register for all bostadsrätter (condominiums) with improved mortgage transparency, and stricter identity requirements for property registration — targeting money laundering in the real estate sector. Both effective 2026-2027.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-aggregate-risk-assessment">⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-aggregate-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregate-risk-assessment">⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-aggregate-risk-assessment">⚠️ Aggregate Risk Assessment<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk Area</th><th>Score</th><th>Key Driver</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal sustainability (FiU48)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>4.1B SEK budget weakening in election year</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR/Human Rights (SfU22)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Inhibition without residence creates rights vacuum</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional lock-in (KU32, KU33)</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Vilande decisions bind next government</td></tr><tr><td>EU Compliance (TU21, TU22, MJU19)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Multiple EU deadlines 2026-2027</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural Emissions</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>CAP eco-scheme underperformance</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional (KU42, KU43)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Routine administrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-aggregate-assessment">🗳️ Election 2026 Aggregate Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-aggregate-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-aggregate-assessment">🗳️ Election 2026 Aggregate Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-aggregate-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Most electorally salient</strong>: HD01FiU48 (fuel/energy relief — direct voter pocket benefit)<br>
 <strong>Second tier</strong>: HD01SfU22 (migration enforcement — top-3 voter issue)<br>
 <strong>Constitutional stakes</strong>: HD01KU32, HD01KU33 (bind the next government — cross-party significance)<br>
@@ -737,8 +737,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-aggregate-assessment">🗳️ Election 2026 Aggrega
 <strong>Background risk</strong>: HD01MJU21 (rural voter sensitivity to agriculture conditions)<br>
 <strong>Coalition test</strong>: SD's influence visible across SfU22 and KU42 (defense budget areas)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-document-analysis">🔗 Cross-Document Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-document-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle">The Election-Year Economic Triangle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-document-analysis">🔗 Cross-Document Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-document-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle">The Election-Year Economic Triangle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle"></a></h4>
 <p>The FiU48 supplementary budget, the SfU22 migration enforcement reform, and the KU32/33 constitutional amendments form a deliberate electoral triangle:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>FiU48</strong>: "We put money in your pocket" — economic populism targeting centrist/right voters</li>
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-the-election-year-economic-triangle">The Election-Year Economic Trian
 <li><strong>KU32/KU33</strong>: "We reformed foundational laws" — governance legacy regardless of election result</li>
 </ul>
 <p>This pattern — economic relief + enforcement + constitutional legacy — reflects a government that expects to lose some ground in September 2026 but is positioning for a legacy and a competitive return.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-compliance-chain">EU Compliance Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-compliance-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-compliance-chain">EU Compliance Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-compliance-chain"></a></h4>
 <p>Four reports this cycle are directly EU-mandated:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>FiU48</strong>: EU energy tax directive minimum levels (fuel tax floor)</li>
@@ -755,13 +755,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-compliance-chain">EU Compliance Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>MJU19</strong>: EU circular economy directive</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Sweden faces simultaneous compliance pressure across four policy domains. The FiU48 fuel tax cut is paradoxically both an election relief measure AND an EU compliance correction — bringing Sweden to directive minimum levels.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion">Enforcement Architecture Expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion">Enforcement Architecture Expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-enforcement-architecture-expansion"></a></h4>
 <p>Both <strong>SfU22</strong> (migration inhibition) and <strong>TU22</strong> (tachograph) expand state enforcement capacity through surveillance mechanisms (geographic restrictions/mandatory check-ins; digital tachograph monitoring). Together with <strong>TU19</strong> (municipal port security in NATO context) and <strong>CU27</strong> (property registration identity verification), this suggests a broad legislative trend toward enforcement infrastructure buildup across migration, transport, and property domains.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports | <strong>Method</strong>: 5-dimension scoring<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:45 UTC — includes HD01FiU48 (new top story, extra ändringsbudget 2026)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-matrix">Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Electoral</th><th>Constitutional</th><th>EU Impact</th><th>Immediacy</th><th>Controversy</th><th>TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td><strong>22/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td><strong>22/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>19/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>17/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>16/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>14/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td><strong>13/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>13/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td><strong>13/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td><strong>9/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU22</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td><strong>12/25</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6/25</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-dimensions">Scoring Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-dimensions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-dimensions">Scoring Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-dimensions"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Electoral</strong>: Impact on 2026 election voter mobilization (1=marginal, 5=top issue)</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional</strong>: Affects fundamental rights, Riksdag powers, or rule of law (1=admin, 5=constitutional)</li>
@@ -920,110 +920,110 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-dimensions">Scoring Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Immediacy</strong>: Implementation timeline relative to election (1=long-term, 5=pre-election)</li>
 <li><strong>Controversy</strong>: Opposition party resistance strength (1=consensus, 5=fierce opposition)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-story-recommendation">Top Story Recommendation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-recommendation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story-recommendation">Top Story Recommendation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-recommendation"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Co-headline</strong>: HD01FiU48 (22/25 — Extra ändringsbudget: fuel tax cut + energy price relief, 4.1B SEK, election-year relief package) and HD01SfU22 (22/25 — Migration enforcement inhibition reform)</p>
 <p><strong>FiU48 tie-break</strong>: Although both FiU48 and SfU22 score 22/25, FiU48 is the <strong>top story</strong> as it was tabled TODAY (April 21, 2026) and its direct financial impact affects the entire Swedish population — making it more immediately newsworthy.</p>
 <p><strong>Strong secondaries</strong>: HD01KU32 (19/25 — Constitutional accessibility amendment, vilande) and HD01KU33 (17/25 — Constitutional search &#x26; seizure amendment, vilande)</p>
 <p><strong>Third tier</strong>: HD01TU21 (17/25 — State e-ID), HD01MJU21 (17/25 — Agriculture climate audit), HD01MJU19 (17/25 — Waste legislation reform)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Framework</strong>: 8-Group Political Intelligence Model | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:52 UTC — HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget) added as primary document for all 8 groups</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>Fourteen committee reports analyzed across 8 mandatory stakeholder groups. Primary focus on <strong>HD01FiU48</strong> (fuel tax cut + energy price relief, 4.1B SEK) as the most broadly impactful document, <strong>HD01SfU22</strong> (migration enforcement) for political significance, with secondary perspectives on KU32/KU33 (constitutional amendments), TU21 (e-ID), and MJU21 (agriculture climate).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-citizens">1. Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HD01SfU22</strong>: Swedish public opinion on migration enforcement remains strongly divided. SIFO polling (Jan 2026) shows 54% support tighter enforcement including stricter return procedures; 31% prioritize humanitarian protection. Working-class voters — SD's strongest demographic — overwhelmingly support deterrence measures. Elderly and welfare-dependent communities track TU21 (e-ID accessibility) as a practical concern.</p>
 <p><strong>HD01TU21</strong>: Digital equity resonates across demographic lines. 1.5 million Swedish adults lack BankID access (primarily elderly, recent immigrants, unbanked). State e-ID addresses a genuine inclusion gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Key citizen concerns</strong>: Rule of law + cost efficiency (SfU22), digital inclusion (TU21), climate fairness without harming food prices (MJU21).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l">2. Government Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l">2. Government Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-m-sd-kd-l"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong>: Champions SfU22 as essential enforcement tool; supports TU21 as digital modernization; endorses MJU21 recommendations for efficiency-first agricultural reform.</p>
 <p><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong>: Principal driver of migration tightening; SfU22 is a core Tidöavtal deliverable. Claims credit for eliminating "residence permit loophole." Skeptical of MJU21 if it threatens food security.</p>
 <p><strong>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</strong>: Supportive of enforcement; adds "human dignity" framing. Supports agricultural subsidy conditionality as stewardship.</p>
 <p><strong>Liberalerna (L)</strong>: Monitors ECHR compliance on SfU22; strongly supports TU21 (digital rights, eIDAS2). Cautious on MJU21 without implementation safeguards.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition unity score</strong>: HIGH on SfU22; HIGH on TU21; MEDIUM on MJU21 (C-party tension risk).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c">3. Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-s-v-mp-c"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>: Opposes SfU22's elimination of temporary permits; argues it creates "stateless limbo." Supports TU21 in principle but demands privacy safeguards. Cautiously supports MJU21 recommendations.</p>
 <p><strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>: Strongly opposes SfU22; labels it "cruel and legally dubious." Demands withdrawal of geographic restriction powers. Strong supporter of MJU21 binding emission conditions.</p>
 <p><strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>: Opposes SfU22; prioritizes MJU21 as part of climate transition; wants stronger agricultural emission targets than government proposes.</p>
 <p><strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong>: Splits from coalition trend: opposed to any binding conditions on agricultural subsidies (rural voter base); cautiously supportive of TU21; may abstain on MJU21 key votes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry">4. Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: Transport and construction sectors (reliant on asylum labor) face labor supply uncertainty. Insurance industry monitors inhibited persons' legal status for contract validity.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Banking sector (SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Nordea) opposes state e-ID as threat to BankID revenue model. Fintech and digital services sector sees opportunity. E-commerce sector supports standardized identity verification.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) strongly opposes binding agricultural emission conditions. Food processors (Arla, HKScan) neutral but monitor input cost implications. Biogas and precision agriculture firms see opportunity.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society">5. Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: FARR (Flyktinggruppernas Riksråd), Red Cross, and Amnesty International will challenge inhibition orders through legal aid and court challenges. Public advocacy campaigns expected.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Pensionärsorganisationer (PRO, SPF) strongly supportive of accessibility. Funktionsrätt Sverige supports digital inclusion for disabled persons.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF, Swedish Society for Nature Conservation strongly supportive of binding agricultural climate conditions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: EU Returns Directive (2008/115/EC) permits enforcement delay mechanisms; inhibition must comply. European Commission migration compliance reviews monitor Sweden's returns performance.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: EU eIDAS2 Regulation (EU 910/2014 amended) creates compliance obligation for state digital identity. European Parliament monitors member state implementation timelines.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: EU Commission's CAP monitoring; Sweden must demonstrate eco-scheme effectiveness in Strategic Plan annual reports.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: Migration Court of Appeal (Migrationsöverdomstolen) will face novel questions on geographic restriction proportionality and ECHR Article 5 (liberty). Constitutional review (KU) should assess compatibility with basic freedoms.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Data protection authorities (IMY) will scrutinize state e-ID registry design for GDPR compliance.</p>
 <p><strong>KU42</strong>: KU itself reviews constitutionality of expenditure area design.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SfU22</strong>: Aftonbladet, Expressen (left-leaning tabloids) will run personal stories of affected families; Svenska Dagbladet, Dagens Nyheter (quality press) will cover legal arguments. SVT will seek balanced reporting. Risk of "Sweden's cruel immigration system" international narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>TU21</strong>: Tech media (Breakit, Computer Sweden) positive. General press frames as digital equity story.</p>
 <p><strong>MJU21</strong>: Agricultural publications (Land, ATL) monitoring; environmental media (Miljöaktuellt) supportive of accountability.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget: Supplementary Analysis Across 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-fiu48">1. Citizens (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget: Supplementary Analysis Across 8 Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-supplementary-analysis-across-8-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-fiu48">1. Citizens (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p>All 5.7 million Swedish licensed drivers benefit from the 82 öre/liter petrol reduction. Rural and suburban households — disproportionately car-dependent — gain the most. Elderly households and those with gas heating benefit from el- och gasprisstöd. Transit users and urban apartment renters see minimal direct benefit. <strong>Net verdict</strong>: High positive reception across a broad voter base, though climate-conscious citizens (primarily MP/V voters) may view the measure negatively.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48">2. Government Coalition (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48">2. Government Coalition (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>M (Moderaterna)</strong>: Embraces fiscal conservatism caveat — supports as temporary, emergency measure; highlights EU compliance angle (directive minimum)
 <strong>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</strong>: Champions as "government that delivers for ordinary Swedes" — rural drivers are core SD demographic<br>
 <strong>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</strong>: Frames as family protection — heating costs and commuter costs both benefit family households<br>
 <strong>L (Liberalerna)</strong>: Most cautious — monitors carbon pricing implications; may emphasize "temporary" framing<br>
 <strong>Coalition unity</strong>: VERY HIGH on FiU48 — one of strongest cross-party coalition moments since 2022 energy crisis</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48">3. Opposition Bloc (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48">3. Opposition Bloc (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong>: Split — working-class drivers benefit, but S climate credibility threatened by supporting fossil fuel price cuts. Expected: accept without enthusiasm, criticize "election-year populism"<br>
 <strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong>: Will oppose — frames as fossil fuel subsidy; demands that savings be redirected to public transport<br>
 <strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong>: Will strongly oppose — EU minimum fossil fuel tax is antithema to climate policy<br>
 <strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong>: Will welcome privately (rural voter base heavily car-dependent) but may maintain public silence on climate grounds<br>
 <strong>Opposition fragmentation</strong>: FiU48 splits the opposition, with V/MP opposing and C likely neutral/positive</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48">4. Business/Industry (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48">4. Business/Industry (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Transport sector (haulage, logistics)</strong>: Significant direct savings on diesel — 319 SEK/m³ cut reduces operating costs for every Swedish haulage company. Estimates: 1.5-2% reduction in per-km fuel costs for heavy goods vehicles<br>
 <strong>Agriculture (LRF)</strong>: Combined benefit from FiU48 (fuel costs) and SkU23 (EV charging) — agriculture uses both diesel machinery and increasingly electric alternatives<br>
 <strong>Retail fuel (Circle K, Preem, ST1, OKQ8)</strong>: Volume increase expected as price elasticity triggers additional fill-up frequency<br>
 <strong>EV sector</strong>: Paradoxically disadvantaged — ICE vehicles made relatively more competitive vs. electric<br>
 <strong>Energy providers</strong>: El- och gasprisstöd creates one-time balance sheet item; minimal operational impact</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-fiu48">5. Civil Society (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-fiu48">5. Civil Society (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF, Greenpeace</strong>: Will run "fossil fuel subsidy" campaign framing; pressure government on climate targets<br>
 <strong>Konsumentverket</strong>: Monitors whether petrol stations pass through full savings (price transparency obligation)<br>
 <strong>Consumer organizations</strong>: Support — cost-of-living relief visible and immediate<br>
 <strong>Disability organizations</strong>: Energy support benefits households relying on electric equipment (mobility aids, medical devices)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48">6. International/EU (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48">6. International/EU (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>European Commission</strong>: Will note Sweden temporarily reducing fossil fuel taxes toward directive minimum — no formal infringement since Sweden remains at or above ETD floor. However, Commission Energy Transition DG may express concern about signal<br>
 <strong>Nordic partners (DK, NO, FI)</strong>: Norway exempt (non-EU). Denmark and Finland have higher fuel taxes — no competitive harmonization pressure<br>
 <strong>IPCC/Climate bodies</strong>: Sweden reducing its carbon price signal contradicts Paris Agreement ambition language<br>
 <strong>NATO partners</strong>: No direct implications for defense posture</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Riksdagen (legislative review)</strong>: FiU mechanism legally uncontroversial; Finance Committee finds "special reasons" requirement met<br>
 <strong>Swedish courts</strong>: No constitutional challenge expected — extraordinary budget is standard legislative tool<br>
 <strong>Skattemyndigheten (Tax Authority)</strong>: Administrative implementation straightforward — existing systems handle tax rate changes<br>
 <strong>EU Court of Justice</strong>: Compliance with Energy Taxation Directive minimum levels — no violation</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48">8. Media/Public Opinion (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48">8. Media/Public Opinion (FiU48)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Aftonbladet, Expressen</strong>: Will run prominent "How much you save" price comparison graphics — positive coverage for government<br>
 <strong>Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet</strong>: "Election-year populism" analytical angle; expert quotes on climate consequences<br>
 <strong>SVT/SR</strong>: Balanced — consumer benefit story + climate policy concern<br>
 <strong>Miljöaktuellt, ETC</strong>: Strong critical coverage on carbon pricing regression<br>
 <strong>International media (FT, Politico Europe)</strong>: "Sweden cuts fuel taxes before election" story fits European right-populism narrative</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Bayesian scenario tree per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> §Scenario Tree Analysis.
 <strong>Assessment window</strong>: 2026-04-21 → 2027-04-21 (12 months).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-space-definition">🎯 Scenario-Space Definition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-space-definition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-space-definition">🎯 Scenario-Space Definition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-space-definition"></a></h3>
 <p>Five scenarios span the most plausible futures for the tri-pillar package (FiU48, SfU22, KU32/33). Each scenario is conditioned on the 14 September 2026 election and on ECHR/EU-court litigation outcomes through Q2 2027.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     Root["🌲 Scenario Root&#x3C;br/>2026-04-21 committee package adopted"]
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-space-definition">🎯 Scenario-Space Definition<a class=""
     style TAIL fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFF
     style WILD fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probability-matrix">📊 Scenario Probability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probability-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-matrix">📊 Scenario Probability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1088,8 +1088,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probability-matrix">📊 Scenario Probability Matrix<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Prior P</th><th align="center">Conditional P(Elec outcome)</th><th align="center">Posterior P</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 <strong>BASE</strong> — Coalition retained; FiU48 sunsets as planned; KU32/33 re-affirmed; SfU22 ECHR amendment minor</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">0.42 × 0.82 (subpath held) + 0.12 (BULL absorbed back)</td><td align="center"><strong>0.42</strong></td></tr><tr><td>🔵 <strong>BULL</strong> — Coalition retained + FiU48 extended to year-end + KU32/33 uncontested</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">0.42 × 0.28</td><td align="center"><strong>0.12</strong></td></tr><tr><td>🔴 <strong>BEAR</strong> — S-led minority; FiU48 reversed Q1 2027; KU33 partially lapses; SfU22 ECHR-amended</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">Direct</td><td align="center"><strong>0.28</strong></td></tr><tr><td>🟣 <strong>TAIL</strong> — S+V+MP+C majority + Migrationsöverdomstolen strikes SfU22 before election</td><td align="center">0.05</td><td align="center">0.10 × 0.80</td><td align="center"><strong>0.08</strong></td></tr><tr><td>⚡ <strong>WILDCARD</strong> — Technical PM government; all measures renegotiated</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">Direct</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Sums to 1.00 (normalised). Conditional probabilities informed by: Novus + SIFO April 2026 polling averages; ECtHR case-law base rates; historical coalition-formation outcomes (1976–2022).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-narratives">🎭 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base-p042--legacy-package-holds">🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Package Holds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base-p042--legacy-package-holds"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-narratives">🎭 Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base-p042--legacy-package-holds">🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Package Holds<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-p042--legacy-package-holds"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: Coalition retained with narrower margin (171–178 seats); FiU48 sunsets 30 Sept 2026 as scheduled; post-election Riksdag re-affirms KU32 and KU33 in Q4 2026 / Q1 2027; SfU22 amended minor-procedurally to address Migrationsöverdomstolen preliminary ruling (e.g. narrower geographic-restriction radius).</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes 12 months out</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base-p042--legacy-package-holds">🟢 BASE (P=0.42) — Legacy Packa
 <li>Opposition narrative: "They bought your votes and walked"</li>
 <li>Coalition narrative: "We delivered relief + reform + legacy"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bull-p012--electoral-tailwind">🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tailwind<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull-p012--electoral-tailwind"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull-p012--electoral-tailwind">🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tailwind<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull-p012--electoral-tailwind"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: Coalition retained + gains. FiU48 extended to 31 Dec 2026 then gradually unwound to March 2027. Constitutional package passes with increased margin.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull-p012--electoral-tailwind">🔵 BULL (P=0.12) — Electoral Tail
 <li>ECHR challenge filed but government uses electoral mandate to resist</li>
 <li>SD + M consolidate enforcement credibility narrative</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bear-p028--partial-reversal">🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear-p028--partial-reversal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear-p028--partial-reversal">🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear-p028--partial-reversal"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: S-led minority government forms (S+V informal support + MP confidence-and-supply). Coalition unable to form alternative majority.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear-p028--partial-reversal">🔴 BEAR (P=0.28) — Partial Reversal
 <li>KU33: <strong>lapses</strong> — S-led government does not re-propose; 3-year cooling-off period begins</li>
 <li>Tidöavtal effectively defunct post-2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike">🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full Reversal + ECHR Strike<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike">🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full Reversal + ECHR Strike<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: S+V+MP+C majority forms. Migrationsöverdomstolen issues preliminary ruling striking SfU22 §4 before new government takes office.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--tail-p008--full-reversal--echr-strike">🟣 TAIL (P=0.08) — Full R
 <li>Narrative victory: "Courts protected constitutional rights that parliament tried to abolish"</li>
 <li>ECtHR Strasbourg filing may be withdrawn as moot</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election">⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inconclusive Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election">⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inconclusive Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Political landscape</strong>: 4–6 weeks of talks produce a technical-PM government (Schlüter/Johansson-style cross-bloc figure). No working majority.</p>
 <p><strong>Key outcomes</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard-p010--inconclusive-election">⚡ WILDCARD (P=0.10) — Inco
 <li>High political volatility; monthly updating required</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario">📈 Decision-Relevant Variables for Each Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario">📈 Decision-Relevant Variables for Each Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--decision-relevant-variables-for-each-scenario">📈 Decision-Relevan
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Variable</th><th align="center">BASE</th><th align="center">BULL</th><th align="center">BEAR</th><th align="center">TAIL</th><th align="center">WILDCARD</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 total cost (SEK bn)</td><td align="center">4.1</td><td align="center">7.5</td><td align="center">2.8 (partial)</td><td align="center">2.0</td><td align="center">5.5</td></tr><tr><td>Extended CPI impact (pp)</td><td align="center">-0.3</td><td align="center">-0.6</td><td align="center">-0.1</td><td align="center">+0.1 (rebound)</td><td align="center">-0.3</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 inhibited persons (n, 12 mo)</td><td align="center">900–1,200</td><td align="center">900–1,200</td><td align="center">&#x3C;200</td><td align="center">0 (struck)</td><td align="center">400–700</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 re-affirm probability</td><td align="center">0.85</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.45</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 extension probability</td><td align="center">0.05</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td align="center">0.00</td><td align="center">0.00</td><td align="center">0.30</td></tr><tr><td>Climate framework credibility delta</td><td align="center">-1 (minor)</td><td align="center">-3 (major)</td><td align="center">+1 (repair)</td><td align="center">+2 (strong repair)</td><td align="center">-1</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition unity index post-election</td><td align="center">N/A</td><td align="center">0.99</td><td align="center">0.85</td><td align="center">0.82</td><td align="center">0.70</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-protocol">🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bayesian-update-protocol"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-update-protocol">🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-update-protocol"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code>, scenario probabilities must be updated monthly or when any of these evidence events occur:</p>
 
 
@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--bayesian-update-protocol">🎯 Bayesian Update Protocol<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Event</th><th>Update direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Novus/Sifo monthly shift ≥3 pp</td><td>Adjust Elec conditional P</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on SfU22</td><td>Adjust TAIL conditional P</td></tr><tr><td>First Migrationsöverdomstolen filing</td><td>+0.04 to TAIL, -0.02 each to BASE/BULL</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet memo Q3 2026</td><td>+0.03 to BEAR</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 extension announcement</td><td>+0.15 to BULL, -0.10 to BASE</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 amendment at committee stage</td><td>+0.03 to BASE (lower ECHR exposure)</td></tr><tr><td>Svenska Bankföreningen lobbying success vs TU21</td><td>Not scenario-relevant (horizon mismatch)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--monitoring-triggers">🧭 Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--monitoring-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">🧭 Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--monitoring-triggers">🧭 Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Novus Sept 2026 poll shows coalition &#x3C;165 seats equivalent</td><td>P(BASE)&#x3C;0.30</td><td>Re-weight BEAR up</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet flags SfU22 as ECHR-problematic</td><td>P(TAIL) >0.12</td><td>Early-warning to newsroom</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 unwind delay announced</td><td>P(BULL) >0.25</td><td>Narrative update</td></tr><tr><td>C-party opens negotiations with S before election</td><td>P(TAIL) >0.15</td><td>Coalition-math rerun</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Art. 39 interim measure in SfU22 case</td><td>P(TAIL) >0.25</td><td>Priority advisory to subscribers</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--worst-case--black-swan-considerations">📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--worst-case--black-swan-considerations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-worst-case--black-swan-considerations">📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan Considerations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-worst-case--black-swan-considerations"></a></h3>
 <p>Beyond the five scenarios, three low-probability high-impact events worth monitoring:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Snap re-election</strong> (P=0.03) — If government falls before 14 Sept 2026 (unlikely given 1-seat majority but possible if L backbench fractures on SfU22). Collapses scenario tree; new root needed.</li>
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--worst-case--black-swan-considerations">📉 Worst-Case / Black-Swan
 <li><strong>Major fiscal surprise</strong> (e.g. CPI spike, energy shock) (P=0.12) — Could structurally convert FiU48 sunset into permanent measure regardless of election outcome.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-methodology-linkage">🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-methodology-linkage">🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong> <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — BEAR/TAIL scenarios materialise top-tier risks R-SfU22-1 + R-FiU48-1</li>
 <li><strong>Threat</strong> <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> — TAIL scenario = realised Threat T1 (SfU22 ECHR strike)</li>
@@ -1312,10 +1312,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-methodology-linkage">🔗 Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class=""
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟨 MEDIUM. Probabilities are point estimates with ±0.05 uncertainty bands. Primary uncertainty is the September 2026 election outcome (no reliable forecast exists with &#x3C;60% confidence at T-5 months).</p>
 <p><strong>Next Bayesian update</strong>: 2026-05-21 (or triggered by monitor events above).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Framework</strong>: ISO 31000 + ISMS | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:52 UTC — Expanded to 14 documents, FiU48 fiscal risks added</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Committee Reports 2026-04-21 (14 documents)
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -1333,8 +1333,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     MJU21-Rural: [0.75, 0.55]
     TU22-CrossBorder: [0.80, 0.55]
     KU42-Oversight: [0.30, 0.70]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-risks">Priority Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--critical-li--15">🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--critical-li--15"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks">Priority Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-critical-li--15">🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-li--15"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1386,7 +1386,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--critical-li--15">🔴 CRITICAL (L×I ≥ 15)<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th><th>Owner</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-FiU48-1</td><td>Opposition reframes fuel tax cut as "fossil fuel subsidy" — climate credibility damage</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government comms</td><td>May-Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R-FiU48-2</td><td>Carbon pricing precedent — fuel tax cut becomes structural; climate targets undermined</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>Oct 2026 +</td></tr><tr><td>R-SfU22-1</td><td>ECHR challenge to inhibition geographic restrictions</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R-SfU22-2</td><td>Political weaponization of "stateless limbo" narrative</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government comms</td><td>Election 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--high-li-8-14">🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--high-li-8-14"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-high-li-8-14">🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-li-8-14"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--high-li-8-14">🟠 HIGH (L×I 8-14)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-TU21-1</td><td>BankID lobby delays state e-ID rollout</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>R-FiU48-3</td><td>Budget impact underestimated — 4.1B SEK in election year weakens fiscal standing</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-MJU21-1</td><td>C-party demands weakened agriculture conditions</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-TU22-1</td><td>Cross-border tachograph enforcement gap</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-MJU21-2</td><td>EU CAP compliance failure</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU32-1</td><td>Post-election Riksdag fails to re-affirm KU32 (accessibility constitutional amendment)</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU33-1</td><td>Press freedom critics mobilize against KU33 (digital seizure ruling)</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--moderate-li--7">🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--moderate-li--7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-moderate-li--7">🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-moderate-li--7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--moderate-li--7">🟢 MODERATE (L×I ≤ 7)<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-KU42-1</td><td>UO change reduces defense spending oversight</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU28-1</td><td>Housing register implementation delay</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>R-SkU23-1</td><td>EV charging exemption creates unequal subsidy landscape</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigation-priority">Mitigation Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-priority"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigation-priority">Mitigation Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigation-priority"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>FiU48</strong>: Sunset clause communication — government must proactively frame September 30, 2026 end date to prevent "permanent" expectation from forming</li>
 <li><strong>SfU22</strong>: Legal aid access provisions + geographic restriction proportionality review</li>
@@ -1493,10 +1493,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitigation-priority">Mitigation Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>MJU21</strong>: Assign lead agency (Jordbruksverket) with binding targets</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports | <strong>Scope</strong>: All 14 committee reports<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:50 UTC — Expanded to 14 documents including HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment">Overall Legislative Batch Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment">Overall Legislative Batch Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "STRENGTHS"
     S1["Coalition fiscal delivery\n(FiU48 — cost-of-living relief 4.1B SEK)"]
@@ -1540,8 +1540,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-overall-legislative-batch-assessment">Overall Legislative Batch Asses
     style T2 fill:#cc8844,color:#fff
     style T3 fill:#cc8844,color:#fff
     style T4 fill:#cc8844,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-dimension-details">Dimension Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-details"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-dimension-details">Dimension Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-details"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">STRENGTHS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal relief to voters</td><td>Fuel tax cut 82 öre/liter + el/gas support; 5.7M drivers benefit</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition enforcement delivery</td><td>SfU22 implements Tidöavtal migration commitment</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU compliance leadership</td><td>TU21 (eIDAS2), MJU19 (waste directive), FiU48 (ETD minimum)</td><td>HD01TU21, HD01MJU19, HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Digital equity advance</td><td>1.5M Swedes without BankID access gain identity option</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market transparency</td><td>National bostadsrätts register improves mortgage clarity; anti-money-laundering property ID rules</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional legacy</td><td>KU32/KU33 vilande bind next government to accessibility and seizure rules</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Circular economy progress</td><td>Waste legislation clarifies responsibility, enables circular economy</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">WEAKNESSES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fossil fuel price signal regression</td><td>Fuel tax to EU minimum undercuts Sweden's carbon leadership</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR exposure</td><td>Geographic restriction + mandatory check-in = liberty risk</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Budgetary fragility</td><td>-4.1B SEK in election year; if extended = structural weakness</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural oversight fragmentation</td><td>Riksrevisionen identified dual-agency responsibility gap</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Technical displacement challenge</td><td>BankID monopoly entrenched; state e-ID faces adoption battle</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Climate audit non-response</td><td>MJU20 climate framework audit shows policy fragmentation</td><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">OPPORTUNITIES<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Economic narrative dominance</td><td>FiU48 gives government "on your side" economic story</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Election mandate activation</td><td>SfU22 rewards SD/M base; demonstrates delivery</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic e-ID leadership</td><td>Sweden can model state e-ID for Denmark, Norway, Finland</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Housing market reform credit</td><td>Two CU reforms improve consumer protection</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental compliance</td><td>MJU19 positions Sweden as circular economy leader</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">THREATS<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>L×I</th><th>Docs</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Opposition reframes FiU48 as fossil fuel subsidy</td><td>16</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Carbon price precedent locks in lower fossil fuel taxes</td><td>15</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR challenge to SfU22 geographic restrictions</td><td>15</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Political "cruel Sweden" narrative (SfU22)</td><td>16</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Banking lobby delays TU21 implementation</td><td>16</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C-party defection on MJU21 conditions</td><td>12</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU32/KU33 campaign mobilization against constitutional amendments</td><td>10</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Confidence:</strong> 🟩 HIGH — Based on FULL-TEXT for HD01FiU48, HD01SfU22, HD01KU32, HD01KU33; SUMMARY for remaining 10 documents.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1: Political Threat Taxonomy Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "🏷️ Political Threat Taxonomy — 2026-04-21"
         NI["🎭 Narrative Integrity"]
@@ -1809,7 +1809,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-section-1-political-threat-taxonomy-assessment">🏷️ Section 1
     style TR1 fill:#FF9800,color:#000
     style DP1 fill:#FF9800,color:#000
     style PB1 fill:#FF9800,color:#000</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-scores-05">Dimension Scores (0–5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-scores-05"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-scores-05">Dimension Scores (0–5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-scores-05"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1860,7 +1860,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-scores-05">Dimension Scores (0–5)<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Primary evidence</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🎭 <strong>Narrative Integrity</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>FiU48 pre-election framing as "cost-of-living relief" vs analyst reading as "pre-election fiscal populism"</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>📝 <strong>Legislative Integrity</strong></td><td align="center">4/5</td><td>SfU22 creates no-status cohort with geographic restrictions — contra German <em>Duldung</em> ECtHR precedent, Danish <em>udrejsecenter</em> (Akhtar v. Denmark 2023)</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>🚫 <strong>Accountability</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>FiU48 enacted without Klimatpolitiska rådet ex-ante assessment; FiU48 cuts precede MJU20 audit conclusions</td><td>→ steady</td></tr><tr><td>🔇 <strong>Transparency</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>KU33 <em>restricts</em> transparency — digitally seized materials (e.g., mirror-imaged hard drives from police searches) no longer automatically constitute <em>allmänna handlingar</em> under TF. Narrows public-records access; targets a prior ambiguity exploited in high-profile investigations.</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>⛔ <strong>Democratic Process</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>Dual <em>vilande</em> grundlagsändringar pre-commit post-election Riksdag under RF 8:14</td><td>↑ rising</td></tr><tr><td>👑 <strong>Power Balance</strong></td><td align="center">3/5</td><td>1-seat coalition majority (176/349) advances generational changes (grundlag + SfU22 structural)</td><td>→ steady</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate</strong>: 19/30 = <strong>HIGH</strong> threat level. The principal pressure points are <strong>legislative integrity</strong> (SfU22 ECHR exposure), <strong>democratic process</strong> (<em>vilande</em> lock-in), and <strong>transparency</strong> (KU33 narrows public-records access).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat "SfU22 struck down by court"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court">🌳 Section 2: Attack Tree — Top Threat "SfU22 struck down by court"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court"></a></h3>
 <p>The <code>political-threat-framework.md</code> mandates Attack Trees for the top threat.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: SfU22 struck down&#x3C;br/>(OR — any path suffices)"]
@@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2-attack-tree--top-threat-sfu22-struck-down-by-court">🌳 S
     style A fill:#FF9800,color:#FFF
     style B fill:#FF9800,color:#FFF
     style A1 fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol">Leaf-Node Attributes (per framework §Attack Tree Construction Protocol)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol">Leaf-Node Attributes (per framework §Attack Tree Construction Protocol)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-leaf-node-attributes-per-framework-attack-tree-construction-protocol"
 <p><strong>Cheapest attack path</strong>: A1 (Protocol 4 Art. 2) — high feasibility, high detectability, moderate cost.
 <strong>Early-warning MCP signal</strong>: FARR press release on first inhibition order issued (~June 2026) + <code>search_dokument</code> for Migrationsöverdomstolen preliminary ruling docket.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression">⛓️ Section 3: Political Kill Chain — SfU22 ECHR Challenge Progression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression">⛓️ Section 3: Political Kill Chain — SfU22 ECHR Challenge Progression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     R["1️⃣ Reconnaissance&#x3C;br/>FARR monitors HD01SfU22&#x3C;br/>committee drafts (March 2026)"]
     W["2️⃣ Weaponisation&#x3C;br/>Coalition building: FARR + Red Cross + UNHCR&#x3C;br/>(April 2026, in progress)"]
@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-section-3-political-kill-chain--sfu22-echr-challenge-progression"
     style D fill:#FF9800,color:#FFF
     style I fill:#D32F2F,color:#FFF
     style Ach fill:#7B1FA2,color:#FFF</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment">Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment">Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-kill-chain-disruption-assessment">Kill-Chain Disruption Assessment<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Current status</th><th>Disruption opportunity (for government)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>✅ Completed — FARR tracking</td><td>Negligible — public procedure</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>🟠 In progress</td><td><strong>Window</strong>: amend geographic-restriction proportionality before 1 June implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>🔲 Pending (awaits implementation)</td><td>Legal aid access provisions + individual-case proportionality review</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>🔲 Future</td><td>Proactive government transparency on enforcement numbers</td></tr><tr><td>Installation</td><td>🔲 Expected ≤Aug 2026</td><td>Structurally unavoidable once Stage 4 reached</td></tr><tr><td>Command &#x26; Control</td><td>🔲 Future</td><td>Negligible</td></tr><tr><td>Actions on Objective</td><td>🔲 Q4 2026–2027</td><td>Primary defence: amendment at coalition stage</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — SfU22 Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor">💎 Section 4: Diamond Model — SfU22 Primary Threat Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     A["👤 ADVERSARY&#x3C;br/>FARR + Red Cross + UNHCR&#x3C;br/>(coordinated legal challenge)"]
     V["🎯 VICTIM&#x3C;br/>Government enforcement credibility&#x3C;br/>Tidöavtal flagship reform"]
@@ -2008,7 +2008,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4-diamond-model--sfu22-primary-threat-actor">💎 Section 4:
 <strong>Capability</strong>: Established ECtHR litigation channels; 12+ adverse rulings against German <em>Duldung</em> regime as precedent bank; Akhtar v. Denmark (2023) on concentrated-residence directly analogous.
 <strong>Infrastructure</strong>: Migrationsöverdomstolen admissibility doctrine requires exhausted remedies; ECtHR Section filing window opens after that. INGO amicus pathways active.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor ICO Profile — FARR-led Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition">👤 Section 5: Threat Actor ICO Profile — FARR-led Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2033,31 +2033,31 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5-threat-actor-ico-profile--farr-led-coalition">👤 Section
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Intent</strong></td><td>HIGH — Public commitments to challenge Tidöavtal migration measures; 2023–2025 filing pattern shows systematic litigation strategy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Capability</strong></td><td>HIGH — In-house legal team; UNHCR amicus precedent; established access to Migrationsöverdomstolen and ECtHR</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity</strong></td><td>HIGH — 1 June 2026 implementation creates immediate fact-pattern; geographic-restriction §4 is textually similar to Danish <em>udrejsecenter</em> struck in Akhtar v. Denmark</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>ICO composite</strong>: <strong>HIGH × HIGH × HIGH = HIGH</strong>. The challenge is not speculative; it is an expected feature of SfU22's implementation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6-secondary-threats">🎯 Section 6: Secondary Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6-secondary-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3">T2 — FiU48 Climate-Framework Accountability Bypass (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6-secondary-threats">🎯 Section 6: Secondary Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6-secondary-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3">T2 — FiU48 Climate-Framework Accountability Bypass (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fiu48-climate-framework-accountability-bypass-severity-3"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Accountability + Narrative Integrity.
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Klimatlagen (2017:720) §5 mandates climate-impact assessment of fiscal measures with emission significance. FiU48 was expedited as emergency supplementary budget, compressing that review. Klimatpolitiska rådet's Q3 2026 memo is expected to flag the bypass.
 <strong>Disruption</strong>: Government proactively publishes retrospective climate-impact note before Q3 2026.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01FiU48 motivering §3 (emergency justification); Skr. 2025/26:95 (MJU20 Riksrevisionen audit of Climate Policy Framework).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3">T3 — Dual <em>Vilande</em> Post-Election Failure (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3">T3 — Dual <em>Vilande</em> Post-Election Failure (Severity 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--dual-vilande-post-election-failure-severity-3"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Democratic Process.
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: RF 8:14 <em>vilande</em> mechanism requires identical wording in next Riksdag. KU33 (digital-seizure <em>access restriction</em> via TF-amendment) has ≤50% re-affirmation probability in BEAR scenarios (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math) — an S-led government could view the restriction as an undue narrowing of public-records access and decline to re-propose. Failure to re-affirm triggers three-year waiting period before re-proposal.
 <strong>Disruption</strong>: None during this parliament; probability depends on 14 Sept election outcome.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01KU32, HD01KU33 <em>vilande</em> status confirmed in betänkandetexts.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23">T4 — Banking Sector Lobbying vs TU21 (Severity 2–3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23">T4 — Banking Sector Lobbying vs TU21 (Severity 2–3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t4--banking-sector-lobbying-vs-tu21-severity-23"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Taxonomy</strong>: Power Balance + Legislative Integrity.
 <strong>Mechanism</strong>: Svenska Bankföreningen + BankID consortium have demonstrated 2018–2024 pattern of delaying legislation via regulatory capture of utredning references. eIDAS2 deadline 2026 narrows the window.
 <strong>Disruption</strong>: Hard legislative deadline anchored to eIDAS2; Commission infringement risk pressures compliance.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01TU21 motivering; Svenska Bankföreningen remissvar on SOU 2024:XX.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7-cross-methodology-linkage">🔁 Section 7: Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7-cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7-cross-methodology-linkage">🔁 Section 7: Cross-Methodology Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7-cross-methodology-linkage"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Threat T1 (SfU22 ECHR)</strong> → Risk <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> R-SfU22-1 (L=3, I=5, Score=15) + SWOT <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> W2 "ECHR exposure" + Stakeholder <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a> §3 opposition framing.</li>
 <li><strong>Threat T2 (FiU48 accountability)</strong> → Risk R-FiU48-1 (L=4, I=4, Score=16) + SWOT W1 "fiscal precedent stickiness" + Election lens <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md"><code>election-2026-implications.md</code></a> §Tier 1.</li>
 <li><strong>Threat T3 (<em>vilande</em> failure)</strong> → Coalition math <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math + Scenario tree <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> BEAR branch.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators">📡 Section 8: Forward MCP-Detectable Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators">📡 Section 8: Forward MCP-Detectable Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8-forward-mcp-detectable-indicators">📡 Section 8: Forward
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>MCP tool</th><th>Expected window</th><th>Meaning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>First FARR press release re SfU22 implementation</td><td>— (external) + <code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td><td>≤1 week of 1 June 2026</td><td>Kill Chain stage 3 (Delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen docket entry</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (type=dom)</td><td>≤Aug 2026</td><td>Kill Chain stage 5 (Installation)</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet FiU48 memo</td><td><code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td><td>Q3 2026</td><td>T2 realisation</td></tr><tr><td>L-party backbench statement on SfU22</td><td><code>search_anforanden</code> (parti=L)</td><td>April–May 2026</td><td>Coalition unity risk signal</td></tr><tr><td>Svenska Bankföreningen TU21 position</td><td>— (external) + <code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>T4 escalation signal</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on KU33 enforcement regulations</td><td><code>search_dokument</code> (doktyp=Lagrådet)</td><td>Q3 2026</td><td><em>Vilande</em> re-affirmation risk signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement">📅 Section 9: Threat Evolution Timeline (v2.3 template requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement">📅 Section 9: Threat Evolution Timeline (v2.3 template requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title SfU22 ECHR Challenge — Expected Threat Evolution
     April 2026 : Committee adoption (HD01SfU22)
@@ -2124,7 +2124,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-9-threat-evolution-timeline-v23-template-requirement">📅 S
     2027 : ECtHR admissibility decision
          : Potential Art. 39 interim measures</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-10-threat-level-change">📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-10-threat-level-change"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-10-threat-level-change">📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-10-threat-level-change"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2160,8 +2160,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-10-threat-level-change">📉 Section 10: Threat Level Change
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH. Primary evidence is the full text of HD01FiU48, HD01SfU22, HD01KU32, HD01KU33 plus peer-jurisdiction ECtHR case law. See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a> for known gaps.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27">HD01CU27<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2216,10 +2216,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: MEDIUM (SUMMARY). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01CU27 adopts stricter identity-verification requirements at Lantmäteriet for property-title (<em>lagfart</em>) and leasehold-registration applications. This is the civil-affairs committee's <strong>anti-money-laundering</strong> contribution to the coalition's Tidöavtal-era financial-crime agenda: tightened identity checks prevent the use of property transactions to launder proceeds. Expected cross-party majority (≈330–0) reflects broad consensus on the policy direction, though implementation cost to Lantmäteriet is the principal operational concern. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong> (summary data only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01CU27] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Property · Anti-money-laundering]
@@ -2264,8 +2264,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification">📊 Political Classification<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Property / AML</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-1">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-1">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AML alignment</td><td>Aligns with 6AMLD + Financial Action Task Force recommendations</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Broad cross-party support</td><td>All parties back principle; only implementation details debated</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2309,7 +2309,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-1">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Implementation cost to Lantmäteriet</td><td>Agency remissvar cites staffing + IT costs</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Non-resident purchaser friction</td><td>Transaction slowdown for foreign buyers</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-1">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Contributes to Sweden's FATF compliance</td><td>Q3 2026 mutual evaluation cycle</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Integrates with TU21 state e-ID for verification layer</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §4</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2349,7 +2349,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-1">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Implementation delay if Lantmäteriet under-resourced</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-1">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-CU27-1</td><td>Lantmäteriet implementation delay</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU27-2</td><td>Foreign-purchaser friction complaints</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-1">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Technical; low salience</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td>No constitutional element</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td>AML directive alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Pre-election implementation path</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Consensus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>12/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2455,14 +2455,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td>Operational concern</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Real-estate industry</td><td>Cautious support</td><td>LOW friction</td></tr><tr><td>Finansinspektionen</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Civil-society (Transparency International Sverige)</td><td>Support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU28</strong> (housing register): Thematic sibling; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (state e-ID): Provides identity-layer architecture for CU27 verification; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §4</li>
 <li><strong>HD01SfU22</strong>: Enforcement-architecture cluster; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §2</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2491,8 +2491,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Window</th><th>MCP tool</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lantmäteriet implementation plan</td><td>Q3 2026</td><td><code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td></tr><tr><td>FATF Sweden mutual evaluation findings</td><td>Q4 2026</td><td>— (external)</td></tr><tr><td>Integration with TU21 API spec</td><td>2027+</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu28">HD01CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-1">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-1"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-1">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2547,10 +2547,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-1">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: MEDIUM (SUMMARY). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01CU28 establishes a national register for bostadsrätter (cooperative apartments) — a long-awaited market-transparency reform correcting an information asymmetry peculiar to Sweden's housing market. Unlike single-family homes and condominiums in most European jurisdictions, Swedish cooperative apartments have historically had no centralised ownership register, creating opacity, financial-crime vulnerability, and difficulty with mortgage-security assessment. The register aligns cooperative apartments with EU transparency norms and integrates with TU21 state e-ID and HD01CU27 identity verification. Implementation timeline spans 2027–2029. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong> (summary data only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-1">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-1">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01CU28] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Property · Consumer protection · Transparency]
@@ -2595,8 +2595,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-1">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Housing / Property / Transparency</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-1">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-2">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-2">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-2">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2623,7 +2623,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-2">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Closes long-standing market-transparency gap</td><td>CU: Finansinspektionen 2023 report cited as basis</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>AML/transparency architecture</td><td>Enables systemic financial-crime monitoring</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage-security valuation</td><td>Aligns cooperative apartments with condominium norms</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-2">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-2">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2645,7 +2645,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-2">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Privacy concern for individual owners</td><td>Register scope (full owner disclosure vs aggregated) debated</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Bostadsrättsföreningar administrative burden</td><td>HSB + Riksbyggen remissvar cite small-association cost</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-2">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-2">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2667,7 +2667,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-2">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Proptech innovation pipeline</td><td>Opens data for third-party mortgage/analytics products</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>EU transparency-directive alignment</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-2">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-2">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-2">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDPR compliance challenges on full-owner disclosure</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-1">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-2">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-1">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-CU28-1</td><td>Implementation delay 2027</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU28-2</td><td>GDPR compliance challenge on owner disclosure</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td></tr><tr><td>R-CU28-3</td><td>HSB/Riksbyggen small-association cost backlash</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW-MODERATE.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-1">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-2">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2765,7 +2765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-1">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Housing-market voters; moderate salience</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">2</td><td>No constitutional element</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Transparency-directive alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>2027–2029 rollout</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Owner-privacy debate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>14/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-1">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-1">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2803,13 +2803,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-1">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HSB, Riksbyggen (housing cooperatives)</td><td>Cautious</td><td>MEDIUM administrative burden</td></tr><tr><td>Finansinspektionen</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage industry</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Proptech sector</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten</td><td>Cautious on scope</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-1">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-1">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01CU27</strong> (identity at lagfart): Integrated verification pipeline; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (state e-ID): Identity-layer dependency; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §4</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-1">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-1">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-1">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Window</th><th>MCP tool</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Förordning implementation guidance</td><td>Q4 2026</td><td><code>search_dokument_fulltext</code></td></tr><tr><td>Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten yttrande</td><td>Q3 2026</td><td><code>search_dokument</code></td></tr><tr><td>HSB + Riksbyggen transition plan</td><td>2027</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Document</strong>: HD01FiU48<br>
 <strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd<br>
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)<br>
@@ -2848,7 +2848,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <strong>Analyst Confidence</strong>: 🟦VERY HIGH<br>
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-21 14:45 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-document-summary">1. Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-document-summary">1. Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The Finance Committee (FiU) recommends that the Riksdag approve the government's extraordinary supplementary budget for 2026. The budget contains two measures:</p>
 <p><strong>Measure 1: Fuel Tax Cut (May 1 – September 30, 2026)</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2871,11 +2871,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-document-summary">1. Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Legal authority</strong>: Government may issue extraordinary supplementary budgets when "special reasons" exist (as permitted by the Riksdag Act). FiU finds the cited reasons (Middle East conflict + high winter energy prices) constitute such special reasons.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-six-analytical-lenses">2. Six Analytical Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-analytical-lenses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension">Lens 1: Constitutional/Legal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-2-six-analytical-lenses">2. Six Analytical Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-six-analytical-lenses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension">Lens 1: Constitutional/Legal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-constitutionallegal-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>The extraordinary budget (extra ändringsbudget) mechanism requires FiU to find "special reasons" (particularly strong justification). The committee accepts the government's framing. The fuel tax cut specifically aligns energy tax levels with EU minimum thresholds — paradoxically making this a compliance-oriented measure as well as an economic relief measure. No constitutional challenge expected.</p>
 <p><strong>Legal risk</strong>: LOW [HIGH confidence]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension">Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension">Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>This is the most electorally transparent measure in the April 2026 batch. The timing — five months before the September 14, 2026 general election — with a measure directly affecting petrol prices at every Swedish gas station — is an unambiguous electoral intervention. The government frames it as emergency relief; political scientists will note that emergency relief packages in election years are a textbook electoral strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral benefit</strong>: The 82 öre/liter cut represents approximately 5% of typical pump price. With ~5.7 million licensed drivers and ~4.8 million registered cars in Sweden, the measure is personally felt by a majority of eligible voters. The rural and suburban voter profile — already disproportionately car-dependent — aligns with the M+SD+KD+L coalition's core demographic.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition dilemma</strong>: S is squeezed between opposing "fossil fuel subsidies" (alienating climate voters) and appearing to deny cost-of-living relief to workers (alienating traditional S voters). V and MP will oppose vocally; C (rural/car-dependent base) may privately welcome the measure.</p>
@@ -2888,11 +2888,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-electoralpolitical-dimension">Lens 2: Electoral/Political Dime
     style FiU48 fill:#ff0000,color:#fff
     style Rural fill:#00aa00,color:#fff
     style Budget fill:#aa0000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension">Lens 3: Policy Substance Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension">Lens 3: Policy Substance Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-policy-substance-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>The fuel tax cut brings Swedish energy taxes to the EU directive minimum — a floor set by the Energy Taxation Directive 2003/96/EC. This is a legitimate EU compliance observation, but the directive minimum was set in 2003 and has not been inflation-adjusted since, meaning it represents an extremely low floor by modern standards. Sweden has historically maintained much higher fuel taxes as part of its carbon pricing strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy reversal significance</strong>: Sweden had among the EU's highest fuel taxes pre-cut. Reducing to minimum temporarily reverses decades of progressive carbon pricing at the pump. If this becomes a political precedent, it complicates Sweden's Climate Action Plan targets and carbon price trajectory.</p>
 <p><strong>Energy support</strong>: The el- och gasprisstöd fills a political gap — the high January-February 2026 heating season coincided with a period of above-normal electricity spot prices (due to cold snap + reduced Norwegian hydro). The government cannot change past prices but can compensate affected households retroactively.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension">Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension">Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title FiU48 Fiscal Risk Assessment
     x-axis Low Fiscal Risk --> High Fiscal Risk
@@ -2907,7 +2907,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-economicfiscal-dimension">Lens 4: Economic/Fiscal Dimension<a
 <p>The 4.1 billion SEK total cost in election year represents approximately 0.04% of GDP — fiscally manageable but symbolically significant. With Sweden running near-zero structural deficit, the one-time cost is absorbable. The real fiscal risk is if the fuel tax cut is extended beyond September 2026 — permanent lower fuel taxes would reduce annual tax revenue by approximately 3 billion SEK per year.</p>
 <p><strong>Interest rate context</strong>: Sweden's Riksbank cut rates to ~2.5% in early 2026 after peak inflation subsided. The government can justify temporary stimulus given improved inflation conditions.</p>
 <p><strong>Economic data (World Bank verified)</strong>: Swedish inflation peaked at 8.5% in 2023 (FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG) before falling to 2.8% in 2024 — household energy cost burden remains politically salient even as headline inflation normalized. GDP growth recovered to 0.82% in 2024 (from -0.20% in 2023), providing fiscal headroom for temporary stimulus. Total 4.1B SEK cost ≈ 0.04% of Swedish GDP (603.7B USD in 2024).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension">Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension">Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-stakeholder-impact-dimension">Lens 5: Stakeholder Impact Dimen
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Impact</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Private car owners (5.7M)</td><td>+33 SEK/month savings (petrol)</td><td>🟩 HIGH benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Truck/diesel operators</td><td>+200-400 SEK/tank savings</td><td>🟩 HIGH benefit</td></tr><tr><td>LRF farmers</td><td>Fuel cost reduction for agriculture</td><td>🟩 MEDIUM benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Fossil fuel retailers (Circle K, Preem, ST1)</td><td>Volume increase expected</td><td>🟩 MEDIUM benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Climate NGOs (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF)</td><td>Carbon price dilution</td><td>🔴 HIGH concern</td></tr><tr><td>S/MP/V opposition</td><td>Electoral disadvantage</td><td>🔴 HIGH concern</td></tr><tr><td>State budget</td><td>-4.1B SEK 2026</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM risk</td></tr><tr><td>EV drivers (SkU23 context)</td><td>Fuel competitors benefited not them</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM concern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension">Lens 6: Forward Indicators/Timeline Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension">Lens 6: Forward Indicators/Timeline Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3002,7 +3002,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-forward-indicatorstimeline-dimension">Lens 6: Forward Indicato
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut takes effect</td><td>May 1, 2026</td><td>Immediate petrol price impact at pumps</td></tr><tr><td>Tax cut expires (unless extended)</td><td>September 30, 2026</td><td>Becomes post-election decision</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support payments</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Households receive retroactive support</td></tr><tr><td>General election</td><td>September 14, 2026</td><td>Voters likely to associate measure with government</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election budget debate</td><td>October 2026</td><td>New/returning government must decide on extension</td></tr><tr><td>EU energy tax directive review</td><td>2027</td><td>Commission expected to propose updated minimum levels</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-evidence-table">3. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-evidence-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-evidence-table">3. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-evidence-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3065,7 +3065,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-evidence-table">3. Evidence Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Petrol tax cut 82 öre/liter</td><td>FiU48 report, explicit figure</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Diesel cut 319 SEK/m³</td><td>FiU48 report, explicit figure</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Total budget impact 4.1B SEK</td><td>FiU48 report, government proposal</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Income reduction 1.56B SEK</td><td>FiU48 report</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Expenditure increase 2.4B SEK</td><td>FiU48 report</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>May 1 - Sept 30 2026 period</td><td>FiU48 report</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU energy tax directive minimum</td><td>Context analysis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>5.7M licensed drivers in Sweden</td><td>Transportstyrelsen statistics</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish inflation 8.5% (2023), 2.8% (2024)</td><td>World Bank FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>GDP growth 0.82% (2024)</td><td>World Bank NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG</td><td>🟦VERY HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000">4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000">4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-risk-assessment-iso-31000">4. Risk Assessment (ISO 31000)<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Measure extended beyond Sept 2026, reducing climate policy base</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Sunset clause built in; but election pressure may force extension</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition success in reframing as "fossil fuel subsidy"</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government must maintain "emergency relief" framing</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support insufficient (too low to cover actual bill increases)</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>More targeted support mechanisms possible</td></tr><tr><td>Carbon price signal disruption</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Climate NGO legal challenges, EU Commission concerns</td></tr><tr><td>Budget impact underestimated if fuel demand exceeds projections</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>One-time measure; capped by period</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific">5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific">5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3169,8 +3169,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-swot-fiu48-specific">5. SWOT (FiU48-specific)<a class="" aria-hidde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Demonstrate government "on the side of ordinary Swedes"</td><td>"Populist" label from climate-conscious media</td></tr><tr><td>Neutralize S cost-of-living attacks</td><td>EU Commission may flag carbon pricing regression</td></tr><tr><td>Rural and suburban voter activation</td><td>If prices rise again in Oct 2026, perceived relief is short-lived</td></tr><tr><td>Precedent for post-election energy policy</td><td>Competing with EV charging tax exemption (SkU23) narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-2">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-2"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-2">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3225,10 +3225,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-2">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: HIGH (FULL-TEXT). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-2">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-2">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01KU32 adopts as <em>vilande</em> under Regeringsformen 8:14 a grundlagsändring extending digital-accessibility obligations to press-freedom-protected media (TF- and YGL-registered publications). Its consequence is that the next Riksdag — chosen 14 September 2026 — must pass <strong>identical wording</strong> for the amendment to take effect (expected 1 January 2028). Cross-party support is broad; disability-rights organisations and all four opposition parties endorse the policy direction. The threat surface is not political opposition but procedural continuity: if even minor textual amendments are required after the election, the three-year cooling-off period restarts. <strong>[HIGH]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-2">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-2">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU32] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Constitutional / Media policy]
@@ -3284,8 +3284,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-2">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Standard grundlag process; no national-security element</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Constitutional / Media / Disability</td><td>TF + YGL + CRPD intersection</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td><td><em>Vilande</em> timeline</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td><td>Multi-party alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Legacy constitutional commitment</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td><td>Neither advances nor retards coalition cohesion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-2">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-3">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-3">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-3">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3312,7 +3312,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-3">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CRPD Article 9 compliance strengthening</td><td>KU32 <em>motivering</em> cites UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2022 observations</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Aligns with EU Accessibility Act 2025</td><td>KU32 cross-references Directive (EU) 2019/882 implementation</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Disability-rights sector unified in support</td><td>Funka + Synskadades Riksförbund remissvar supportive</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-3">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-3">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3334,7 +3334,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-3">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Press-freedom concern from small publishers</td><td>TU: SVT Online + large publishers assert cost burden for small TF-registered publications</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement ambiguity for user-generated content</td><td>KU32 §4 leaves implementation to förordning; scope unclear for comment sections</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-3">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-3">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3356,7 +3356,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-3">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Aligns Sweden with Nordic accessibility leadership (Norway AT, Finland WCAG)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §disability</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>CRPD 2027 Sweden review reports</td><td>Strengthens narrative</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-3">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-3">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3374,7 +3374,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-3">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Re-affirmation risk in fragmented post-election Riksdag</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math: P=0.85–0.95 re-affirm</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-2">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-3">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3407,7 +3407,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-2">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-KU32-1</td><td>Post-election Riksdag fails to re-affirm identically</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Cross-party briefing pre-election</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU32-2</td><td>Small publishers challenge proportionality</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Förordning-level exemption thresholds</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW (no critical or high exposure).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU32 lapses without re-affirmation" (goal: lapse)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU32 lapses without re-affirmation" (goal: lapse)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: KU32 lapses"]
     ROOT --> A["A: Post-election Riksdag rejects identical wording&#x3C;br/>(OR)"]
@@ -3419,7 +3419,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku32-lapses-without-re-affirmation-goal-lapse">🌳 Att
     style B fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
 <p>Low-probability threat scenario overall.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-2">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-3">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3462,7 +3462,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-2">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1–5)</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Secondary story; disability-rights coverage</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Grundlag amendment</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">4</td><td>EU Accessibility Act alignment</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Post-election dependency</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Multi-stakeholder debate on scope</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>19/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-2">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-2">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3500,14 +3500,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-2">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Disability orgs (Funka, SRF)</td><td>Support</td><td>HIGH positive</td></tr><tr><td>Small publishers (Sveriges Tidskrifter)</td><td>Cautious</td><td>MEDIUM negative (cost)</td></tr><tr><td>Public broadcasters (SVT/SR/UR)</td><td>Support</td><td>NEUTRAL (already compliant)</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>Mixed support</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition (S, V, MP, C)</td><td>Support</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-2">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-2">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01KU33</strong> (dual <em>vilande</em>): Shared RF 8:14 procedural vehicle and post-election timing; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §3</li>
 <li><strong>HD01KU42</strong> (utgiftsområden): Constitutional-budget structure; same committee</li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (state e-ID): Digital-inclusion horizontal linkage</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-2">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-2">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3537,8 +3537,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-2">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Related</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a> (sibling <em>vilande</em>)</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-3">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-3"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-3">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3594,11 +3594,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-3">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>🛠️ Revision note</strong>: An earlier draft of this file incorrectly framed KU33 as a pro-transparency disclosure obligation. The actual amendment <strong>narrows</strong> public-records access for digitally seized materials. Revised 2026-04-21 after article/analysis reconciliation.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-3">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-3">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01KU33 adopts as <em>vilande grundlagsändring</em> an amendment to Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) establishing that <strong>digital recordings seized or copied during a <em>husrannsakan</em> (police search) are not deemed <em>allmänna handlingar</em></strong>. The rule also covers copies transferred between authorities pursuant to custody of the seized information carrier. A carve-back preserves public-records status for any recording that is <em>affixed</em> to a formal investigation or to separate authority business. As a grundlagsändring, re-affirmation by the post-election Riksdag is required; intended effect date 1 January 2027.</p>
 <p>Politically this is a <strong>transparency-restricting</strong> move, not a transparency-enhancing one. Proponents (government + prosecutorial authorities) argue it ends an anomaly by which entire mirrored hard drives could become searchable public records by default; critics (civil-society, press-freedom, and digital-rights groups) argue it creates a new zone of opaque state custody over personal data with only a narrow carve-back. This is the <strong>more fragile of the two dual-<em>vilande</em> amendments</strong>: an S-led post-election government may view the restriction as too broad and decline to re-propose it in identical wording. Re-affirmation probability 40–70% depending on election outcome (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math). <strong>[HIGH]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-3">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-3">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU33] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Constitutional / Justice / Public-records access]
@@ -3653,8 +3653,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-3">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Standard grundlag process</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Constitutional / TF / Justice</td><td>TF + offentlighetsprincipen</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td><td><em>Vilande</em> timing</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟡 WARM</td><td>Civil-liberties + press-freedom resistance</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Narrows public-records access in digital era</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>↓ slight tension</td><td>L-party cautious; S uncertain post-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-3">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-3"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-4">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-4"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-4">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-4">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-4">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Clarifies anomalous TF treatment of bulk digital-evidence copies</td><td>KU33 <em>motivering</em> references prior cases where whole mirrored drives became searchable public records</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Operational benefit to Åklagarmyndigheten + Polismyndigheten</td><td>Avoids resource-intensive sekretess-review of seized mass-storage media</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Carve-back preserves TF status where material is formally added to investigation file</td><td>KU33 §on <em>allmän handling</em> retention</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition (M, SD, KD, L) unified in support</td><td>Floor-vote readings from KU sitting</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-4">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-4">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3713,7 +3713,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-4">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Narrows <em>offentlighetsprincipen</em> in the digital domain</td><td>Civil Rights Defenders + Journalistförbundet remissvar critical</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Carve-back scope ambiguous for data-at-rest that is never formally "added"</td><td>KU33 <em>motivering</em> §on scope</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Creates opaque custody zone for bulk-extracted personal data</td><td>IMY (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten) yttrande flags data-minimisation concern</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-4">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-4">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-4">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Förordning-level data-minimisation and retention rules could meaningfully narrow scope</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Parallel non-constitutional transparency reforms (e.g., statistical reporting) could offset transparency loss</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-4">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-4"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-4">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-4"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3763,7 +3763,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-4">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Post-election lapse — most likely of dual <em>vilande</em> to fail</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> §<em>Vilande</em> Math</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Journalist/whistleblower chill effect on investigative reporting</td><td>Journalistförbundet remissvar</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Art. 10 challenge (media access) low-probability but non-zero</td><td>Referent cases: <em>Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary</em> (2016) on access to state-held information</td><td>🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-3">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-4">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3804,7 +3804,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-3">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-KU33-1</td><td>Post-election Riksdag lapses KU33</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td>Cross-party pre-election briefing on operational rationale</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU33-2</td><td>Carve-back scope drafting fails legal-certainty test</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande review + förordning clarification</td></tr><tr><td>R-KU33-3</td><td>Journalist/whistleblower chill effect documented in investigative reporting 2027+</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td>Transparency-by-statistics compensatory measures</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: MODERATE.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33 lapses after election"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33 lapses after election"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: KU33 lapses"]
     ROOT --> A["A: S-led post-election government&#x3C;br/>does not re-propose&#x3C;br/>(OR)"]
@@ -3818,7 +3818,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--attack-tree--ku33-lapses-after-election">🌳 Attack Tree — "KU33
     style A1 fill:#FFC107,color:#000</pre>
 <p>Cheapest attack path: A1 (S-led government reluctance to narrow public-records access).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-3">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-4">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3861,7 +3861,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-3">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Press-freedom + public-records coverage</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">5</td><td>TF amendment</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Indirect Charter Art. 11 (information) linkage</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">3</td><td>Post-election dependency</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Civil-society + press-freedom resistance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>17/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-3">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-3">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3904,13 +3904,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-3">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Åklagarmyndigheten, Polismyndigheten</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive (operational)</td></tr><tr><td>Journalistförbundet, TU</td><td>Opposition</td><td>HIGH negative (press-freedom)</td></tr><tr><td>Civil Rights Defenders</td><td>Opposition</td><td>HIGH negative (transparency)</td></tr><tr><td>Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)</td><td>Mixed — supports scope limits but flags carve-back scope</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>Supportive with L cautious on scope</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition (S, V, MP, C)</td><td>S cautious, V+MP opposed, C ambivalent</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-3">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-3">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01KU32</strong> (dual <em>vilande</em>): Shared vehicle; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a> — but thematically opposite (KU32 <em>expands</em> accessibility)</li>
 <li><strong>HD01SfU22</strong> (inhibition): Adjacent state-surveillance + rule-of-law space; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-3">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-3">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3945,8 +3945,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-3">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Related</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a> (sibling <em>vilande</em>, contrasting direction)</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku42">HD01KU42<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku42"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-4">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-4"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-4">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3998,10 +3998,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-4">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU42</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:42 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>KU (Konstitutionsutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-4">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-4">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>KU42 concerns the division of Sweden's state budget into expenditure areas (utgiftsområden) — the constitutional architecture that defines how Riksdag controls spending. This seemingly technical matter carries significant political weight: changes to expenditure area classification affect committee jurisdictions, budget flexibility, and governmental accountability. The Constitutional Committee handling this report indicates it has constitutional dimensions, not merely administrative ones. Coming at a time when Sweden's defense budget (utgiftsområde 6) has seen dramatic increases and climate/energy policies are reshaping infrastructure spending (UO21/22/23), the division question directly affects which committees control which funds. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-4">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-4">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-4"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU42] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Constitutional · Budget Architecture · Parliamentary Control"]
@@ -4012,8 +4012,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-4">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style D fill:#44cc44,color:#000
     style G fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-4">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-4"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-5">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-5"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-5">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-5">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4040,7 +4040,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-5">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Parliamentary control</td><td>Clear expenditure areas improve accountability and audit trail</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Defense budget clarity</td><td>Separating defense infrastructure from general infrastructure UOs aids transparency</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative modernization</td><td>Updated classifications reflect post-pandemic policy architecture</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-5">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-5">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4062,7 +4062,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-5">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Inter-committee rivalry</td><td>Changes to UO classification shift power between committees</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Complexity</td><td>Complex cross-UO programs (climate + energy + transport) difficult to segregate cleanly</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-5">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-5">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4079,7 +4079,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-5">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Streamlined Riksdag oversight</td><td>Consolidated UOs reduce audit fragmentation</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-5">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-5">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-5"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4097,7 +4097,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-5">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Political manipulation of UO boundaries</td><td>Majority may draw UO lines to advantage coalition committees</td><td>🟥LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-condensed">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives-condensed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-condensed">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-condensed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4141,7 +4141,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-condensed">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives (C
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Low awareness; indirect impact through budget transparency</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Supportive of efficient budget architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition</strong></td><td>Alert to any UO changes that reduce oversight of defense spending</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Neutral; monitors UO changes affecting investment grants</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society</strong></td><td>Low interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>No direct interest</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>KU mandate to ensure compliance with Riksdag Act §§</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media</strong></td><td>Limited interest unless linked to specific budget controversy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4167,12 +4167,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UO change reduces oversight of defense spending</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>Climate/energy UO fragmentation</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥LOW — Highly technical; not salient to voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — Establishes budget architecture for 2027+ electoral cycle governments.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku43">HD01KU43<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku43"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-5">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-5"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-5">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4224,10 +4224,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-5">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01KU43</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:42 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>KU (Konstitutionsutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-5">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-5">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>KU43 establishes a new law governing the Riksdag's medal — replacing outdated regulations with a modern legal framework for how parliament honors distinguished service. While ceremonially significant, this is administratively routine and politically non-contentious. The Constitutional Committee's involvement reflects Riksdag's self-governance prerogatives under Chapter 4 of the Instrument of Government. The primary political significance is in how the medal criteria are defined — who qualifies and what types of service are honored shapes Riksdag's institutional identity and its relationship with civil society partners. <strong>[VERY LOW]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-5">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-5">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-5"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01KU43] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Parliamentary Administration · Institutional Law"]
@@ -4235,31 +4235,31 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-5">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     D -->|"🟢 ROUTINE"| E[Low controversy — administrative update]
     style D fill:#44cc44,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-condensed">💪 SWOT Analysis (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-condensed"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-6">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-6"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-condensed">💪 SWOT Analysis (Condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-condensed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-6">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Modernizes outdated medal statute; enhances institutional transparency</li>
 <li>Clear legal basis for Riksdag's self-governance</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-6">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-6">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Limited substantive policy impact</li>
 <li>Risk of criteria being perceived as politically partisan if awarded inconsistently</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-6">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-6">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Signal parliamentary institutional health and non-partisan tradition</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-6">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-6">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-6"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Minimal (administrative only)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-1">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥VERY LOW — No direct electoral relevance.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21">HD01MJU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-6">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-6"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-6">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4311,10 +4311,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-6">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01MJU21</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser för jordbrukets klimatomställning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:41 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>MJU (Miljö- och jordbruksutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-6">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-6">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>MJU21 marks the Environment and Agriculture Committee's formal parliamentary response to the National Audit Office (Riksrevisionen) report on state support for agriculture's climate transition. The timing is politically charged: Sweden's agriculture sector produces approximately 13% of national greenhouse gas emissions, yet receives substantial state subsidies (CAP + national co-financing) without demonstrably achieving emissions reductions. The Riksrevisionen's underlying report criticizes the lack of coherent measurement systems, overlapping responsibilities between Jordbruksverket and Naturvårdsverket, and insufficient conditionality in support programs. The committee's response (expected to endorse Riksrevisionen's recommendations) marks a potentially significant shift toward tighter environmental conditions on agricultural subsidies — a direct threat to farming organizations and a potential source of rural voter discontent ahead of the 2026 election. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only; analysis based on Riksrevisionen report patterns and MJU political context)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-6">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-6">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-6"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01MJU21] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Agricultural Policy · Climate Policy · Audit Finding"]
@@ -4327,8 +4327,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-6">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style G fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style H fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-5">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-5"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-7">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-7"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-6">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-6"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-7">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4355,7 +4355,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-7">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen legitimacy</td><td>Audit findings carry constitutional authority; difficult for government to dismiss</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU CAP alignment</td><td>EU Common Agricultural Policy 2023-2027 requires eco-schemes; Sweden underperforming</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition opportunity</td><td>KD and C support sustainable farming; M supports efficiency; reform could unite coalition</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-7">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-7">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4382,7 +4382,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-7">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural voter risk</td><td>Tightening conditions on farming subsidies alienates C/SD rural voters</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Measurement gaps</td><td>No established baseline for agricultural GHG emissions reductions at farm level</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Institutional fragmentation</td><td>Dual responsibility (Jordbruksverket + Naturvårdsverket) without clear lead agency</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-7">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-7">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4404,7 +4404,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-7">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden as EU climate leader</td><td>Implementing genuine agricultural climate conditions would position Sweden above EU average</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Technology-driven transition</td><td>Precision agriculture, biogas, and cover crops can achieve reductions without income loss</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-7">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-7">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-7"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4432,7 +4432,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-7">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Farmer organization backlash</td><td>LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund) fiercely opposes binding conditions</td><td>��HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C-party defection risk</td><td>C (Center Party) represents rural constituencies; may resist binding conditions</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden's 2026 emission targets</td><td>Missing Parisavtalet agriculture commitments exposes Sweden to EU criticism</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-1">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4485,7 +4485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Concern</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Supportive of climate action; divided on farmer impact</td><td>Green transition vs. food costs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Officially supportive of Riksrevisionen; M/KD push efficiency</td><td>Avoid alienating rural C/SD voters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition Bloc</strong></td><td>MP strongly supportive; S cautious; V demand binding conditions</td><td>Speed and ambition of transition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>LRF opposed; food processors neutral; biogas sector supportive</td><td>Subsidy conditions, competitiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society</strong></td><td>Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF strongly supportive</td><td>Biodiversity, climate commitments</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>EU Commission monitoring CAP eco-scheme performance</td><td>Sweden's CAP strategic plan effectiveness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>No specific risk</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media/Public Opinion</strong></td><td>Sympathetic to climate; sympathetic also to struggling farmers</td><td>Narrative balance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-1">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-1">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4528,21 +4528,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-1">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C-party demands weakened conditions</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td><td>Negotiate eco-scheme flexibility with local adaptation</td></tr><tr><td>LRF lobbying campaign undermines reform</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Government communication on long-term competitiveness</td></tr><tr><td>EU CAP compliance failure</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>Assign clear lead agency (Jordbruksverket) with targets</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural emissions increase continues</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>Binding measurement system and reporting requirements</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-2">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — C-party voters (rural, farming) are sensitive; SD rural voters equally so.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong> — C may seek carve-outs for small farmers; SD will prioritize food security narrative over climate.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Agricultural climate transition is more salient among urban climate voters (S/MP/V) than rural voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — If genuine accountability mechanisms established, marks first real step toward Swedish agricultural emission accountability since Paris Agreement.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-4">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-4">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-4"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>May 2026</strong> — Chamber vote on MJU21; watch for C-party reservations or amendment demands</li>
 <li><strong>Q3 2026</strong> — Government response to Riksrevisionen with action plan timeline</li>
 <li><strong>2027</strong> — Mid-term CAP review: Sweden assessed against eco-scheme targets</li>
 </ol>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22">HD01SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-7">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-7"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-7">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-7"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4594,10 +4594,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-7">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01SfU22</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Inhibition av verkställigheten – en ny ordning för vissa utlänningar vid tillfälliga verkställighetshinder</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:40 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>SUMMARY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-7">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-7">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>The Social Insurance Committee's report SfU22 proposes a fundamentally new approach to handling aliens with temporary enforcement obstacles — replacing temporary residence permits with a system of "inhibition" (suspension of deportation) combined with mandatory check-ins and geographic restrictions. This represents a significant tightening of migration policy, eliminating the pathway through which individuals blocked from deportation could effectively gain temporary residence. The reform directly advances the SD-M-KD-L government's migration policy agenda and is expected to face fierce opposition from S, V, and MP on humanitarian grounds. The measure significantly reduces the discretion available to Migrationsverket and expands state surveillance capabilities over individuals awaiting deportation. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong> (summary data only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-7">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-7">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-7"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01SfU22] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🔴 RESTRICTED"| C[Migration/Rule of Law]
@@ -4610,8 +4610,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-7">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style H fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style K fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-6">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-6"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-8">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-8"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-7">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-7"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-8">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4643,7 +4643,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-8">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Closes legal loophole</td><td>Temporary residence permits effectively rewarded individuals who couldn't be deported; inhibition system removes this incentive (HD01SfU22 summary)</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition cohesion</td><td>Aligns with SD-M-KD-L priority on controlled migration; passes with coalition majority</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative efficiency</td><td>Migrationsverket no longer required to issue and renew temporary permits; reduces administrative burden</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Threat management</td><td>Enables geographic restrictions and mandatory check-ins for individuals posing security risks</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-8">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-8">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4670,7 +4670,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-8">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Human rights exposure</td><td>Inhibited persons with no pathway to residence — prolonged limbo raises ECHR Article 3/5 concerns</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional risk</td><td>Creating new surveillance category without full residence rights tests Article 2 Protocol 4 ECHR</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Practicability</td><td>Mandatory geographic restrictions unenforceable without significant policing resources</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-8">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-8">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4692,7 +4692,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-8">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Broader migration reform anchor</td><td>SfU22 signals alignment with EU Returns Directive; positions Sweden favorably in EU migration negotiations</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition credibility booster</td><td>SD base reward — demonstrates government can tighten migration beyond just asylum</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-8">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-8">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-8"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4720,7 +4720,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-8">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Court overturning</td><td>Sweden's Migration Court of Appeal may strike down geographic restrictions as disproportionate</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU infringement risk</td><td>If inhibition conditions deemed to create de facto statelessness contrary to EU Charter</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Political backlash</td><td>S, V, MP will campaign on humanitarian grounds in 2026 election; vulnerability to "cruel Sweden" narrative</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-1">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-2">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4782,7 +4782,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-1">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Concern</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Split (≈55% supportive per SIFO migration polling)</td><td>Order and rule of law vs. humanitarian treatment</td><td>General Swedish polling on migration enforcement</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>Closing residence permit loophole; deterrence effect</td><td>HD01SfU22 aligns with Tidöavtalet migration commitments</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition Bloc (S, V, MP)</strong></td><td>Opposed</td><td>Creation of rightless limbo status; ECHR compliance</td><td>Social Democrats previously backed temporary permits as humanitarian tool</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Neutral-concerned</td><td>Labour supply uncertainty for sectors relying on asylum labor</td><td>Sectors: care, food processing, construction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society (FARR, Red Cross)</strong></td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Conditions of inhibited persons; access to legal aid</td><td>FARR has historically challenged enforcement orders</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>Monitoring</td><td>EU Returns Directive compatibility check</td><td>European Commission migration compliance reviews</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>Alert</td><td>Administrative custody without residence permit classification</td><td>Migration courts will face novel legal questions</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media/Public Opinion</strong></td><td>Polarized</td><td>Framing as humanitarian vs. rule-of-law issue</td><td>Aftonbladet (critical) vs. Svenska Dagbladet (supportive)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-2">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-2">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4825,22 +4825,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-2">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ECHR violation finding</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>Ensure legal aid access; amend geographic restriction scope</td></tr><tr><td>Political weaponization in 2026 campaign</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government must pre-empt with humanitarian safeguards communication</td></tr><tr><td>Enforcement failure — inhibition unenforced</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td><td>Police resource allocation; Migrationsverket coordination</td></tr><tr><td>EU infringement proceeding</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Legal review against EU Charter Article 7, 18, 19</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-3">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Migration enforcement is a top-3 voter issue; SfU22 directly activates SD and M voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong> — SD will claim credit; M positioned as competent manager; if ECHR violations materialize, could damage coalition's rule-of-law credentials.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong> 🟩HIGH — Migration enforcement surveys consistently show 40-55% of Swedish voters prioritize stricter enforcement.</p>
 <p><strong>Campaign Vulnerability</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Opposition will campaign on "Sweden creating a stateless underclass" — risk of international attention.</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — If implemented successfully before September 2026 election, becomes a permanent tightening that future S-led government would struggle to reverse.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-5">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-5">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-5"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>May 2026 chamber vote</strong> — Will pass with coalition majority (M+SD+KD+L); watch for SD amendment requests to expand restrictions</li>
 <li><strong>June 1, 2026</strong> — Implementation date; first inhibition orders expected within weeks; early court challenges anticipated by July 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Q3 2026</strong> — Migration Court of Appeal first rulings on geographic restriction proportionality; determines if reform survives legally</li>
 </ol>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu16">HD01TU16<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-8">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-8"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-8">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-8"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4895,10 +4895,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-8">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Confidence ceiling</strong>: MEDIUM (SUMMARY). Template: <code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code> v2.3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-8">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-8">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01TU16 removes the mandatory introductory driver-training requirement for certain private practice driving situations. The reform addresses a commonly-criticised bureaucratic friction in Sweden's driver-licensing pipeline — practice driving with a family member previously required the supervising adult to complete a one-day introductory course (~1,500 SEK) in addition to other qualifications. TU committee concluded the training requirement did not deliver measurable road-safety benefits relative to its compliance cost. This is a low-salience administrative reform with cross-party support; Transportstyrelsen remissvar cautiously supportive. <strong>[MEDIUM]</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-8">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-8">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-8"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU16] --> B{Sensitivity}
     B -->|"🟢 PUBLIC"| C[Transport · Road safety]
@@ -4943,8 +4943,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-8">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td></tr><tr><td>Domain</td><td>Transport / Administrative</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>Political temperature</td><td>🟢 COOL</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic significance</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition impact vector</td><td>→ neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-7">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-7"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-9">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-9"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-8">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-8"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-9">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4971,7 +4971,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-9">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reduces household administrative cost</td><td>Estimated ~1,500 SEK + half-day per learner household</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Aligns Swedish practice with Nordic norms</td><td>Norway and Denmark do not require equivalent training</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition "regelförenkling" deliverable</td><td>Part of coalition agreement administrative-simplification agenda</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-9">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-9">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4993,7 +4993,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-9">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>STR (Sveriges Trafikutbildares Riksförbund) opposition</td><td>Industry body cites road-safety concern; remissvar critical</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Road-safety evidence ambiguity</td><td>Transportstyrelsen 2023 study inconclusive on training's marginal safety contribution</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-9">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-9">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5010,7 +5010,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-9">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reduces driver-licensing backlog (1.5-year wait in 2024)</td><td>—</td><td>🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-9">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-9">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5028,7 +5028,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-9">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Road-safety framing if accident statistics spike 2027–2028</td><td>Statistical noise likely but narrative risk present</td><td>🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-4">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-assessment-5">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5058,7 +5058,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-assessment-4">⚠️ Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-TU16-1</td><td>Post-implementation accident-stat uptick reframed as reform failure</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td></tr><tr><td>R-TU16-2</td><td>STR industry narrative against reform</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Aggregate risk</strong>: LOW.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-4">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-scoring-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-scoring-5">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5101,7 +5101,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-scoring-4">📈 Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral</td><td align="center">2</td><td>Low salience</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Administrative</td></tr><tr><td>EU impact</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Domestic</td></tr><tr><td>Immediacy</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Pre-election implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Controversy</td><td align="center">2</td><td>STR resistance only</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>10/25</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-4">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-4">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5134,14 +5134,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-4">👥 Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Learner drivers + families</td><td>Strong support</td><td>HIGH positive (cost saving)</td></tr><tr><td>STR industry</td><td>Opposition</td><td>MEDIUM negative (revenue loss)</td></tr><tr><td>Transportstyrelsen</td><td>Cautious support</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>Trafikverket</td><td>Neutral</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--same-day-cross-reference-4">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--same-day-cross-reference-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-same-day-cross-reference-4">🔁 Same-Day Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-same-day-cross-reference-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01TU19</strong> (port security): Same committee, different theme</li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU21</strong> (e-ID): Same committee but non-comparable policy area</li>
 <li><strong>HD01TU22</strong> (tachograph): Same committee; EU compliance counterpart</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-6">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-6">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5171,8 +5171,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-6">📡 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence note</strong>: Analysis based on SUMMARY depth; full motivtext from <code>hd01tu16.json</code> would upgrade confidence to HIGH.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu19">HD01TU19<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu19"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-9">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-9"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-9">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-9"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5224,10 +5224,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-9">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01TU19</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Ny lag om kommunal hamnverksamhet</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:43 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-9">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-9">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>TU19 introduces new legislation governing municipal port operations — a sector that intersects infrastructure ownership (kommunal self-governance), commercial port competition, EU state aid rules, and national security (civilian ports' dual-use military significance has grown since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022). Sweden has 52 commercial ports; 30+ are municipally owned. The law likely addresses operational efficiency, competitive conditions relative to private ports, and potentially security classifications. Municipal port governance is directly relevant to Sweden's Total Defence (Totalförsvar) planning, as ports are critical infrastructure for NATO resupply logistics. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-9">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-9">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-9"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU19] --> B{Dimensions}
     B --> C["Infrastructure · Municipal Governance · Defence · EU Competition"]
@@ -5238,35 +5238,35 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-9">📊 Political Classification<a class=""
     style D fill:#ffaa00,color:#000
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-8">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-8"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-10">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-10"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-9">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-10">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Modernizes port governance for competitive environment</li>
 <li>Addresses EU state aid compliance issues for municipal port subsidies</li>
 <li>Can codify security classification requirements for Total Defence</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-10">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-10">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Municipal autonomy constraints may limit operational efficiency reforms</li>
 <li>Ports vary enormously (Göteborg's massive private port vs. small municipal ferries)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-10">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-10">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>NATO logistics planning requires clear port command structures</li>
 <li>Standardization can attract private investment partnerships</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-10">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-10">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-10"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Municipal lobbying against commercial constraints (SKL/SKR)</li>
 <li>Security dimensions may create NATO-sensitive information sharing complications</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-4">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥LOW — Infrastructure and local governance; not a voter hot-button issue.</p>
 <p><strong>Defence Dimension</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Parties competing on defence credibility should highlight port security improvements.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu21">HD01TU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu21"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-10">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-10"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-10">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5318,10 +5318,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-10">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01TU21</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>En statlig e-legitimation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:41 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-10">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-10">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>TU21 proposes a state-issued electronic identity (e-legitimation) for Sweden — a policy debated for over a decade with profound implications for digital governance, private sector competition, and citizen rights. A state e-ID would reduce dependency on bank-issued BankID, which currently holds near-monopoly status among Sweden's 8.5 million digital users. The proposal places the Traffic Committee in an unusual lead role on a digital identity issue that crosses ICT, banking, and constitutional domain boundaries. The coalition government frames this as digital equity and security modernization; the opposition and banking sector have historically resisted due to competition and privacy concerns. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata only — full assessment pending chamber debate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-10">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-10">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-10"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU21] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Digital Governance — e-ID Infrastructure"]
@@ -5333,8 +5333,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-10">📊 Political Classification<a class="
     style E fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style G fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-9">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-9"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-11">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-11"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-10">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-11">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5361,7 +5361,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-11">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" h
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Digital equity</td><td>15-20% of Swedish adults lack BankID access (elderly, migrants, unbanked)</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU eIDAS2 compliance</td><td>EU eIDAS2 Regulation (effective 2024) requires member states to offer trusted digital identity wallets</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Security standardization</td><td>State e-ID enables higher assurance level (LoA3/4) than current commercial offerings</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-11">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-11">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5388,7 +5388,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-11">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BankID entrenched</td><td>BankID used by 8.5M Swedes; state e-ID faces major adoption challenge</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation cost</td><td>State infrastructure build-out estimated in hundreds of millions SEK</td><td>🟥LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Privacy risk</td><td>Central state identity registry creates honeypot for cyberattacks and government surveillance</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-11">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-11">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5410,7 +5410,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-11">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cross-border EU recognition</td><td>eIDAS2 enables Swedish state e-ID use across EU member states</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Public service modernization</td><td>Enables digital-first government services for all citizens including vulnerable groups</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-11">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-11">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-11"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -5433,7 +5433,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-11">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Banking sector lobbying</td><td>Sweden's major banks (SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Nordea) will resist displacement of BankID revenue</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation delay</td><td>Complex cross-ministry coordination (Finance, Justice, ICT, DIGG) risks timeline slippage</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-2">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-perspectives-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives-3">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5486,7 +5486,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-perspectives-2">👥 Stakeholder Perspectives<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder Group</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Concern</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Citizens</strong></td><td>Broadly supportive</td><td>Accessibility for excluded groups</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government Coalition</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Digital sovereignty, EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition Bloc</strong></td><td>Cautiously supportive</td><td>Privacy, implementation risks</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Business/Industry</strong></td><td>Split: banks (opposed), fintechs (opportunity)</td><td>BankID market disruption</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil Society</strong></td><td>Supportive</td><td>Digital inclusion for elderly, migrants</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International/EU</strong></td><td>Strongly supportive</td><td>eIDAS2 implementation deadline</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Judiciary/Constitutional</strong></td><td>Monitoring</td><td>Data protection, GDPR Article 9</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media/Public Opinion</strong></td><td>Positive-neutral</td><td>Long-overdue modernization</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-3">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-3">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5529,21 +5529,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-3">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BankID lobbying delays implementation</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Government must set firm eIDAS2 compliance deadline</td></tr><tr><td>Data breach of central e-ID registry</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>Defense-in-depth security architecture, distributed storage</td></tr><tr><td>Low adoption rate</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Mandate for government services; interoperability with BankID</td></tr><tr><td>eIDAS2 non-compliance fine</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Fast-track implementation with DIGG lead authority</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-5">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟧MEDIUM — Digitalization is a second-tier issue; salient for tech-savvy voters and elderly communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong> — Cross-party support likely; rare area of political consensus. Government can claim digital modernization achievement.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter Salience</strong> 🟥LOW-MEDIUM — Most voters unaware of eIDAS2 pressure; framed as "making it easier to access public services."</p>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong> — If implemented, becomes a lasting digital infrastructure investment; similar to introduction of personnummer (social security number) in 1947 as foundational state identifier.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators-7">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators-7">📅 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators-7"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Q2 2026 chamber vote</strong> — Expected to pass with broad cross-party support</li>
 <li><strong>2026-2027</strong> — DIGG (Agency for Digital Government) designated as implementation authority; pilot program with 50,000 users</li>
 <li><strong>2027-2028</strong> — Full rollout with eIDAS2 cross-border functionality</li>
 </ol>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu22">HD01TU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--document-identity-11">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-identity-11"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-identity-11">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identity-11"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5595,10 +5595,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--document-identity-11">📋 Document Identity<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Document ID</strong></td><td><code>HD01TU22</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Document Type</strong></td><td><code>committeeReports</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Title</strong></td><td>Åtgärder mot manipulation och missbruk av färdskrivare</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-14</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Source MCP Tool</strong></td><td><code>get_betankanden</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 04:43 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-committee-reports</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Depth</strong></td><td>METADATA-ONLY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-11">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-11">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>TU22 addresses a serious problem in Sweden's road freight sector: systematic manipulation of digital tachographs (färdskrivare) — devices that record driving and rest times for trucks and buses. Tachograph manipulation enables carriers to circumvent EU working time rules, endangering road safety and creating unfair competition against compliant operators. This is an EU compliance measure with direct road safety and fair competition dimensions. The proposal likely introduces enhanced penalties, improved Transportstyrelsen inspection authority, and technical safeguards against tampering. <strong>[LOW]</strong> (metadata-only)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--political-classification-11">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--political-classification-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-classification-11">📊 Political Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-classification-11"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     A[HD01TU22] --> B{Domain}
     B --> C["Transport · Road Safety · Labour Law · Competition"]
@@ -5609,30 +5609,30 @@ <h2 id="rm--political-classification-11">📊 Political Classification<a class="
     style F fill:#88cc44,color:#000
     style G fill:#44aa00,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-analysis-10">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-analysis-10"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-12">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis-11">💪 SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis-11"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-12">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>EU compliance maintains market access for Swedish transport sector</li>
 <li>Reduces road safety risk from fatigued drivers</li>
 <li>Levels competitive playing field between Swedish and Eastern European operators</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-12">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-12">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Enforcement capacity of Transportstyrelsen limited relative to traffic volume</li>
 <li>Swedish operators may lose competitive edge if Eastern European competitors non-compliant</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-12">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-12">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Strengthen Sweden's reputation for compliance in EU transport market</li>
 <li>Digital tachograph blockchain verification emerging EU standard</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-12">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-12">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-12"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Transport company lobbying against inspection costs</li>
 <li>Cross-border enforcement gaps (non-Swedish registered vehicles)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-4">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-matrix-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-4">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5658,12 +5658,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-matrix-4">⚠️ Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Continued manipulation with inadequate enforcement</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-border enforcement gap</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications-6">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications-6">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong> 🟥LOW — Specialist transport sector issue; relevant to union (IF Metall, Transport) voters.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526">🏛️ Riksdag Seat Configuration (Riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526">🏛️ Riksdag Seat Configuration (Riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5699,7 +5699,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-riksdag-seat-configuration-riksmöte-202526">🏛️ Riksdag Seat
 </blockquote>
 <p>The government majority is a <strong>one-seat margin (176–173)</strong>. This makes every coalition-internal defection decisive. Historical floor-vote deviation since 2023: <strong>7 instances of L-party backbench dissent</strong> on ECHR/rule-of-law issues; <strong>3 instances of C-party cross-floor voting</strong> on agriculture.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--vote-margin-forecast-by-report">📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--vote-margin-forecast-by-report"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vote-margin-forecast-by-report">📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-margin-forecast-by-report"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5820,23 +5820,23 @@ <h2 id="rm--vote-margin-forecast-by-report">📊 Vote-Margin Forecast by Report<
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dok_id</th><th>Expected floor vote</th><th align="center">Projected yes–no</th><th align="center">Margin</th><th align="center">Pivot risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Coalition bloc vote</td><td align="center">176–165 (8 abstain)</td><td align="center">+11</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>Coalition bloc vote</td><td align="center">176–173</td><td align="center">+3</td><td align="center">🟠 <strong>L-backbench watch</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 <em>(vilande)</em></td><td>Dual passage — cross-party</td><td align="center">≈280–40</td><td align="center">+240</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33 <em>(vilande)</em></td><td>Dual passage — cross-party</td><td align="center">≈220–90</td><td align="center">+130</td><td align="center">🟡 Press-freedom mobilisation</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈290–25</td><td align="center">+265</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe (C/S support)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Cross-party acceptance</td><td align="center">≈320–0 (Riksrev skr.)</td><td align="center">≈320</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe (audit acceptance)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>Cross-party acceptance</td><td align="center">≈320–0</td><td align="center">≈320</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Coalition + C support</td><td align="center">≈260–60</td><td align="center">+200</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈305–18</td><td align="center">+287</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe (V/MP abstain)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈330–0</td><td align="center">≈330</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈300–20</td><td align="center">+280</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>Coalition majority</td><td align="center">176–150 (23 abstain)</td><td align="center">+26</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈320–0</td><td align="center">≈320</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU22</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈330–0</td><td align="center">≈330</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>Cross-party majority</td><td align="center">≈330–0</td><td align="center">≈330</td><td align="center">🟢 Safe</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Projections based on committee-stage party positions + historical voting patterns for analogous bills.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--the-critical-path-sfu22">🎯 The Critical Path: SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--the-critical-path-sfu22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-the-critical-path-sfu22">🎯 The Critical Path: SfU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-critical-path-sfu22"></a></h3>
 <p>SfU22's expected <strong>176–173</strong> margin is the narrowest of the batch. Three scenarios govern pivot risk:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082">Scenario A — Coalition holds (P=0.82)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082">Scenario A — Coalition holds (P=0.82)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--coalition-holds-p082"></a></h4>
 <p>All 176 coalition MPs vote yes. All 173 opposition MPs vote no. Passes <strong>+3</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012">Scenario B — L-backbench dissent (P=0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012">Scenario B — L-backbench dissent (P=0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--l-backbench-dissent-p012"></a></h4>
 <p>1–3 L MPs abstain or vote no on ECHR grounds (Protocol 4 Art. 2 exposure). Result:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>1 L abstention → 175–172 = <strong>+3</strong> (still passes via reduced-parliament rule if quorum met)</li>
 <li>2 L abstention → 174–173 = <strong>+1</strong> (precarious)</li>
 <li>3 L abstention → 173–173 = <strong>tie</strong>, proposition referred back</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005">Scenario C — C-party split (P=0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005">Scenario C — C-party split (P=0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--c-party-split-p005"></a></h4>
 <p>C-party (24 MPs) bloc-abstains while signalling intention to negotiate. 176–149 = <strong>+27</strong>, but shifts post-election calculus.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001">Scenario D — Tie/referral (P=0.01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001">Scenario D — Tie/referral (P=0.01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tiereferral-p001"></a></h4>
 <p>Deputy-speaker's tie-break invoked; coalition retains on tie-break in Swedish parliamentary practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33">🧮 <em>Vilande</em> Constitutional Math (KU32, KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33">🧮 <em>Vilande</em> Constitutional Math (KU32, KU33)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33"></a></h3>
 <p>Regeringsformen 8:14 requires <em>identical wording</em> passed by two Riksdags with an election between. <strong>The next Riksdag is unknown</strong> — the math depends on the September 2026 election outcome.</p>
 
 
@@ -5876,7 +5876,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--vilande-constitutional-math-ku32-ku33">🧮 <em>Vilande</em> Constit
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Post-election scenario</th><th align="center">KU32 re-affirm prob.</th><th align="center">KU33 re-affirm prob.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Coalition retained (M+SD+KD+L majority)</td><td align="center">0.90</td><td align="center">0.85</td></tr><tr><td>S-led minority (S + V + MP informal)</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">0.35</td></tr><tr><td>Grand coalition (M+S)</td><td align="center">0.80</td><td align="center">0.55</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP+C majority</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center">0.25</td></tr><tr><td>Inconclusive → technical PM</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td align="center">0.45</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>KU33 (digital-seizure access restriction) is the more fragile</strong>: it is framed here as <em>restricting</em> public access to digitally seized materials (a TF-amendment narrowing the <em>allmän handling</em> scope for mirror-imaged storage) — a transparency-narrowing move. An S-led government may view the restriction as too broad an override of <em>offentlighetsprincipen</em> and decline to re-propose in identical wording. KU32 (media accessibility) has broad disability-rights cross-party support and is significantly safer.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch">📈 Coalition Unity Index (CUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch">📈 Coalition Unity Index (CUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch"></a></h3>
 <p>CUI = fraction of coalition MPs voting with the majority on roll-call votes for the batch. Target = 1.00.</p>
 
 
@@ -5918,7 +5918,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-unity-index-cui--this-batch">📈 Coalition Unity Index (C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Report</th><th align="center">Projected CUI</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center"><strong>0.97</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center"><strong>0.99</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td align="center">1.00</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Batch average</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.99</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Compared with Q1 2026 average (0.99), this batch shows <strong>no erosion of coalition cohesion</strong>. The marginal 0.97 on SfU22 reflects L-backbench historical volatility on ECHR issues, not organised dissent.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch">🗳️ Opposition Unity Index (OUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch">🗳️ Opposition Unity Index (OUI) — This Batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch"></a></h3>
 <p>OUI = fraction of opposition (S+V+MP+C, 173 MPs) voting together.</p>
 
 
@@ -5953,10 +5953,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-unity-index-oui--this-batch">🗳️ Opposition Unity
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Report</th><th align="center">Projected OUI</th><th>Dissent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td align="center">0.98</td><td>C possibly abstains rather than no</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">0.92</td><td>S votes no for different reasons than V (proportionality vs abolition)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td>V/MP support accessibility grundlag, S neutral, C neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">0.85</td><td>Press-freedom alignment across all four parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Asymmetric-unity pattern</strong>: opposition unified against enforcement/fiscal measures (0.92–0.98), split on constitutional modernisation (0.75). This mirrors the motions-cycle pattern (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../motions/coalition-mathematics.md</code></a>).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications">⚖️ Reduced-Parliament (Minskad Riksdag) Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications">⚖️ Reduced-Parliament (Minskad Riksdag) Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reduced-parliament-minskad-riksdag-implications"></a></h3>
 <p>Although the reduced-parliament quorum provisions are a separate constitutional track, the <strong>one-seat government margin</strong> means that if a foreign/security crisis triggered reduced-parliament rules, the current 176-MP coalition coalition could struggle to maintain a working majority within any 175-MP subset. This is the operational fragility the reduced-parliament amendments are designed to address — and is itself a reason the pre-election constitutional package is politically sensitive.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-analyses">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-analyses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-analyses">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-analyses"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — Why these margins matter</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — Bayesian scenario tree</li>
@@ -5967,14 +5967,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-analyses">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟨 MEDIUM — Projections extrapolated from committee-stage positions + historical analogues. Actual floor votes will refine.
 <strong>Next Update</strong>: 2026-04-29 (post-kammaren roll calls on FiU48 and SfU22).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Peer-jurisdiction benchmarking across fiscal, migration, constitutional, and digital policy axes.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--overview">🌍 Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview-1">🌍 Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's 2026-04-21 committee package contains four internationally comparable policy moves. This document benchmarks each against 4–6 peer jurisdictions to establish whether Sweden is moving toward or away from mainstream European practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief">1. <strong>FiU48 — Election-Year Fuel-Tax Relief</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief">1. <strong>FiU48 — Election-Year Fuel-Tax Relief</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6048,7 +6048,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-fiu48--election-year-fuel-tax-relief">1. <strong>FiU48 — Election
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden is replicating the <strong>Germany 2022 <em>Tankrabatt</em> template</strong> — the closest direct precedent. Germany's <em>Tankrabatt</em> was <strong>not extended</strong> despite political pressure and left a structural inflation-control gap. Of six peer cases, <strong>zero</strong> converted temporary fuel-tax cuts into permanent structural relief. Sweden's sunset-clause framing is therefore in line with European practice; the <strong>post-election extension pressure</strong> is the comparatively novel risk factor, driven by Sweden's election coinciding with the sunset date.</p>
 <p><strong>Tax-floor comparison</strong>: By cutting to the EU Energy Tax Directive 2003/96/EC minimum, Sweden moves from upper-quartile fuel taxation (~95th percentile in EU) to the <strong>floor</strong>. Only Bulgaria (structurally) and Hungary (sanctions-era emergency) have operated at or below this level in EU-27 history. This is a <strong>significant positional change</strong> for a Nordic welfare state.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit">2. <strong>SfU22 — Migration Inhibition vs Temporary Permit</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit">2. <strong>SfU22 — Migration Inhibition vs Temporary Permit</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6099,7 +6099,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-sfu22--migration-inhibition-vs-temporary-permit">2. <strong>SfU22 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Analogous regime</th><th>Status of inhibited persons</th><th>ECHR litigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden (post-SfU22)</td><td><em>Uppskjuten verkställighet</em></td><td>No residence status, geographic restrictions, check-ins</td><td>Pending</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td><em>Duldung</em> (tolerated stay)</td><td>No residence status, <em>Aufenthaltsgestattung</em> variant, work restrictions</td><td>Multiple ECtHR rulings; Art. 5 &#x26; 8 tensions</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td><em>Niet-uitzetbaar ongedocumenteerde</em></td><td>No status, some rights restored after litigation</td><td>Multiple high-court losses for state</td></tr><tr><td>🇨🇭 Switzerland</td><td><em>Vorläufige Aufnahme (F)</em></td><td>Temporary residence status, reviewable</td><td>ECHR stable</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td><em>Udrejsecenter</em> (departure centres)</td><td>No status, concentrated residence</td><td>EHRR Akhtar v. Denmark (2023), Art. 5 violation</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>Combination of <em>endelig avslag</em> + non-deport</td><td>No status; sometimes regularised after 10+ years</td><td>Stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden's SfU22 is <strong>closest to Germany's <em>Duldung</em></strong> in legal structure — a no-status limbo with enforcement restrictions. Germany's <em>Duldung</em> regime has generated <strong>at least 12 ECtHR adverse rulings</strong> since 2000, primarily on Article 5 (liberty) and Article 8 (family life) grounds, and has been progressively softened by the Integration Acts. Denmark's <em>udrejsecenter</em> concentrated-residence model (closest to SfU22's geographic-restriction element) <strong>lost at ECHR</strong> in <em>Akhtar v. Denmark</em> (2023). This suggests Sweden's ECHR exposure is structurally predictable — <strong>the question is not whether a challenge succeeds but when</strong>. Switzerland's <em>vorläufige Aufnahme</em> — which <strong>grants temporary status rather than inhibiting removal</strong> — is the opposite-direction peer approach and has been ECHR-stable.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments">3. <strong>KU32/KU33 — Constitutional <em>Vilande</em> Amendments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments">3. <strong>KU32/KU33 — Constitutional <em>Vilande</em> Amendments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6144,7 +6144,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-ku32ku33--constitutional-vilande-amendments">3. <strong>KU32/KU33 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Two-Riksdag / two-Parliament rule</th><th align="center">Post-election reaffirmation rate</th><th>Notable failures</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden</td><td><em>Vilande</em> under RF 8:14</td><td align="center">~85% (since 1974)</td><td>1999 EU monetary article lapsed</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td>Kiireellinen/normaali järjestys</td><td align="center">~78%</td><td>Several lapses in 1990s</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>Section 121 — two-Storting rule</td><td align="center">~75%</td><td>1983 referendum amendment lapsed</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>§88 — two-Folketing + referendum</td><td align="center">Rare — structurally cold</td><td>§20 EU amendments sometimes fail</td></tr><tr><td>🇮🇸 Iceland</td><td><em>Stjórnskipunarákvæði</em> — two-Althingi</td><td align="center">~70%</td><td>2013 constitution draft lapsed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden's ~85% <em>vilande</em> reaffirmation rate is <strong>high by Nordic standards</strong> — stemming from Sweden's more consensus-oriented constitutional culture and the fact that <em>vilande</em> amendments are typically cross-party from the outset. KU32 (accessibility) fits this pattern; KU33 (digital-seizure access restriction) is <strong>more politically charged</strong> — because it narrows <em>offentlighetsprincipen</em> for mirrored digital evidence — and closer to the type of amendment that historically has the 15% failure rate. The dual-adoption pattern is uncommon — most Nordic <em>vilande</em> are handled one at a time — but is formally valid.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly">4. <strong>TU21 — State e-ID vs Private-Sector Monopoly</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly">4. <strong>TU21 — State e-ID vs Private-Sector Monopoly</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6209,7 +6209,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tu21--state-e-id-vs-private-sector-monopoly">4. <strong>TU21 — St
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>State digital identity</th><th>Private-sector incumbent</th><th align="center">Market share</th><th align="center">Year of state scheme</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🇸🇪 Sweden (TU21)</td><td>Planned eIDAS2-compliant wallet</td><td>BankID (banks consortium)</td><td align="center">~95%</td><td align="center">2027+ (proposed)</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇰 Denmark</td><td>MitID (state-led, public-private)</td><td>NemID → MitID</td><td align="center">~100%</td><td align="center">2021</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇴 Norway</td><td>ID-porten / BankID / MinID</td><td>BankID (banks)</td><td align="center">~75% BankID / ~25% state</td><td align="center">2008</td></tr><tr><td>🇫🇮 Finland</td><td><em>Suomi.fi-tunnistus</em></td><td>TUPAS (bank-based)</td><td align="center">~60% state / ~40% bank</td><td align="center">2017</td></tr><tr><td>🇩🇪 Germany</td><td>eID-Funktion / <em>Online-Ausweis</em></td><td>None; citizen ID card state-issued</td><td align="center">~60% (opt-in low)</td><td align="center">2010</td></tr><tr><td>🇪🇪 Estonia</td><td>e-Residency / national ID</td><td>None; state monopoly</td><td align="center">~100%</td><td align="center">2002</td></tr><tr><td>🇳🇱 Netherlands</td><td>DigiD</td><td>Mixed</td><td align="center">~90% DigiD</td><td align="center">2003</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Sweden is the <strong>last major Nordic country</strong> to launch a state digital identity. Denmark (MitID, 2021) is the most recent analogue and is considered the EU gold standard post-rollout. Norway has operated a <strong>dual-track</strong> state+bank model since 2008 with no market failure. Sweden's late entry is a consequence of BankID's exceptional penetration (~95%) — a unique European case of private-sector near-monopoly in digital identity. TU21 aligns Sweden with <strong>Nordic mainstream practice</strong>, albeit 5–19 years later than neighbours.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--summary-alignment-map">📊 Summary Alignment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--summary-alignment-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-alignment-map">📊 Summary Alignment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-alignment-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "Sweden 2026-04-21"
     FiU48[FiU48 fuel-tax cut]
@@ -6233,7 +6233,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--summary-alignment-map">📊 Summary Alignment Map<a class="" aria-hi
     style SfU22 fill:#ff4444,color:#fff
     style O1 fill:#cc3300,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Comparative Framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Comparative Framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6271,7 +6271,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-comparative-framings">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Compa
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Sweden follows the German 2022 <em>Tankrabatt</em> template — which Germany did not extend"</td><td>§1 table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"SfU22 aligns Sweden with Germany's <em>Duldung</em> and Denmark's <em>udrejsecenter</em> — both with ECHR adverse rulings"</td><td>§2 table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"State e-ID makes Sweden the last Nordic country to offer a public digital identity — 5 years behind Denmark, 19 behind Norway"</td><td>§4 table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Constitutional <em>vilande</em> reaffirmation succeeds ~85% of the time in Sweden — high by Nordic standards"</td><td>§3 data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Cutting fuel tax to the EU Energy Tax Directive floor moves Sweden from 95th percentile to absolute minimum — a category change"</td><td>§1 text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--comparative-framings-to-avoid">❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--comparative-framings-to-avoid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framings-to-avoid">❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framings-to-avoid"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Sweden is unique in cutting fuel tax" — 6 peer precedents 2022 alone</li>
 <li>❌ "SfU22 is harsher than other European countries" — structurally similar to German <em>Duldung</em>, less restrictive than Danish <em>udrejsecenter</em></li>
@@ -6281,11 +6281,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--comparative-framings-to-avoid">❌ Comparative Framings to Avoid<a c
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Peer data validated against OECD, ECRE, and ECtHR case databases.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-21 15:10 UTC | <strong>Data Depth</strong>: SUMMARY + FULL TEXT for top 8</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6473,7 +6473,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Betänkande</th><th>Title (EN short)</th><th>Committee</th><th>Domain</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>2025/26:FiU48</td><td>Supplementary budget — fuel tax cut + energy relief (4.1B SEK)</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal / Energy</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>2025/26:SfU22</td><td>Inhibition of enforcement (migration)</td><td>SfU</td><td>Migration / Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>2025/26:KU32</td><td>Accessibility requirements — press-freedom media (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td>KU</td><td>Constitutional / Media</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>2025/26:KU33</td><td>Digital seizure transparency (<em>vilande</em>)</td><td>KU</td><td>Constitutional / Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01TU21</td><td>2025/26:TU21</td><td>State e-identification (eIDAS2)</td><td>TU</td><td>Digital / EU</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>2025/26:MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionen — agriculture climate transition</td><td>MJU</td><td>Climate / Agriculture</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>2025/26:MJU19</td><td>Waste legislation reform</td><td>MJU</td><td>Environment / EU</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU20</td><td>2025/26:MJU20</td><td>Riksrevisionen — climate policy framework</td><td>MJU</td><td>Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>2025/26:CU28</td><td>National housing register (bostadsrätter)</td><td>CU</td><td>Housing / Property</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>2025/26:CU27</td><td>Identity requirements — property registration (<em>lagfart</em>)</td><td>CU</td><td>Property / Anti-crime</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD01SkU23</td><td>2025/26:SkU23</td><td>Permanent tax exemption — EV charging electricity</td><td>SkU</td><td>Green taxation</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD01KU42</td><td>2025/26:KU42</td><td>Division into expenditure areas (<em>utgiftsområden</em>)</td><td>KU</td><td>Budget / Constitutional</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>2025/26:SfU20</td><td>Removed notification requirement — parental benefit</td><td>SfU</td><td>Social insurance</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD01TU22</td><td>2025/26:TU22</td><td>Tachograph enforcement (EU)</td><td>TU</td><td>Transport / EU</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD01KU43</td><td>2025/26:KU43</td><td>New law on the Riksdag medal</td><td>KU</td><td>Parliamentary admin</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟢 ROUTINE</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td>2025/26:TU16</td><td>Removed requirement for introductory driver-training</td><td>TU</td><td>Transport / Road safety</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD01TU19</td><td>2025/26:TU19</td><td>Municipal port security (NATO context)</td><td>TU</td><td>Defense / Ports</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Committee Reports 2026-04-21 by Domain
     "Fiscal / Energy" : 1
     "Migration / Justice" : 1
@@ -6485,7 +6485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domai
     "Transport / Defense" : 2
     "Parliamentary admin" : 1
     "Social insurance" : 1</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-committee">📊 Classification by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-committee"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-committee">📊 Classification by Committee<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-committee"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6532,7 +6532,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-committee">📊 Classification by Committee<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Committee</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Most significant</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU</strong> (Finance)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01FiU48 ⭐</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SfU</strong> (Social Insurance / Migration)</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01SfU22 ⭐</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU</strong> (Constitution)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33 (dual <em>vilande</em>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TU</strong> (Transport)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>HD01TU21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MJU</strong> (Environment / Agriculture)</td><td align="center">3</td><td>HD01MJU21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>CU</strong> (Civil Affairs / Housing)</td><td align="center">2</td><td>HD01CU28</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SkU</strong> (Taxation)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>HD01SkU23</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity--urgency-distribution">📊 Sensitivity &#x26; Urgency Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity--urgency-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity--urgency-distribution">📊 Sensitivity &#x26; Urgency Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity--urgency-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6561,7 +6561,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity--urgency-distribution">📊 Sensitivity &#x26; Urgency D
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center"></th><th align="center">🔴 CRITICAL</th><th align="center">🟠 URGENT</th><th align="center">🟡 STANDARD</th><th align="center">🟢 ROUTINE</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🟢 PUBLIC</td><td align="center">1 (FiU48)</td><td align="center">3 (KU32, KU33, TU21)</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">1 (KU43)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td align="center">1 (SfU22)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (TU19)</td><td align="center">0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-rules-applied">🧭 Classification Rules Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-rules-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-rules-applied">🧭 Classification Rules Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-rules-applied"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CRITICAL urgency</strong>: Implementation &#x3C; 60 days OR >2B SEK fiscal impact OR ECHR exposure</li>
 <li><strong>URGENT</strong>: Implementation &#x3C; 12 months OR constitutional <em>vilande</em> status OR EU Commission deadline</li>
@@ -6570,7 +6570,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-rules-applied">🧭 Classification Rules Applied<a cl
 <li><strong>SENSITIVE</strong> sensitivity: Involves individual-rights restriction (SfU22) or national-security context (TU19)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-documents-in-this-dossier">🔗 Related Documents in This Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-documents-in-this-dossier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-documents-in-this-dossier">🔗 Related Documents in This Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-documents-in-this-dossier"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a> — 5-dimension scoring (electoral/constitutional/EU/immediacy/controversy)</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a> — inter-document + related motions/propositions</li>
@@ -6579,11 +6579,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-documents-in-this-dossier">🔗 Related Documents in This Do
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — All 17 documents mapped from official <em>riksdagen.se</em> document metadata + committee handling cards.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Trace legislative lineage (proposition → remiss → betänkande → motion → beslut) and identify thematic convergence across committees.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages">🧬 Proposition → Betänkande Chain (primary linkages)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages">🧬 Proposition → Betänkande Chain (primary linkages)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6669,7 +6669,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--proposition--betänkande-chain-primary-linkages">🧬 Proposition 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Betänkande</th><th>Upstream proposition / skrivelse</th><th>Parallel motions</th><th>Downstream vote</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:220 (extra ändringsbudget för 2026)</td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024098 (MP) — <em>counter-motions</em></td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-23</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:214 (inhibition av verkställighet)</td><td>HD02... (V), HD02... (MP) <em>pending</em></td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-29</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU32</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:109 (<em>vilande grundlagsändring</em>)</td><td>—</td><td>Post-election Riksdag (Sept 2026 +)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01KU33</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:110 (<em>vilande grundlagsändring</em>)</td><td>—</td><td>Post-election Riksdag (Sept 2026 +)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU21</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:181 (Statlig e-legitimation)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01MJU21</strong></td><td>Skr. 2025/26:95 (Riksrevisionen)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01MJU19</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:165 (avfallslagstiftningen)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU28</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:137 (bostadsrättsregister)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU27</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:138 (identitetskrav lagfart)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SkU23</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:155 (laddel)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU16</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:118 (introduktionsutbildning MC)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU22</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:172 (färdskrivare)</td><td>—</td><td>Kammaren 2026-04-22</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-thematic-cross-linkages">🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-thematic-cross-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-linkages">🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-linkages"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     subgraph "🔴 Election-Year Fiscal Cluster"
     FiU48[HD01FiU48\nFuel &#x26; energy relief]
@@ -6711,10 +6711,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-thematic-cross-linkages">🕸️ Thematic Cross-Linkages<a class=
     style KU33 fill:#8844ff,color:#fff
     style TU21 fill:#4488ff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-cross-references-narrative">🔗 Key Cross-References (Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-cross-references-narrative"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction">1. <strong>FiU48 ↔ MJU20/MJU21 — The Climate-Fiscal Contradiction</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-cross-references-narrative">🔗 Key Cross-References (Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-cross-references-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction">1. <strong>FiU48 ↔ MJU20/MJU21 — The Climate-Fiscal Contradiction</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiu48--mju20mju21--the-climate-fiscal-contradiction"></a></h4>
 <p>FiU48 cuts fuel tax to the EU Energy Tax Directive <strong>floor</strong> (the lowest rate permitted). The SAME week, MJU20 (Riksrevisionen audit of the Climate Policy Framework) and MJU21 (agricultural emissions audit) are adopted. This produces an <strong>internal contradiction visible in the journal-of-record</strong>: the government formally accepts Riksrevisionen's findings on climate-framework shortfalls while simultaneously cutting the most carbon-relevant consumption tax. Expect this juxtaposition in Klimatpolitiska rådet's Q3 2026 memo and in Greens/Centre opposition framings.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle">2. <strong>SfU22 ↔ TU19 ↔ CU27 — Enforcement-Identity-Border Triangle</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle">2. <strong>SfU22 ↔ TU19 ↔ CU27 — Enforcement-Identity-Border Triangle</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle"></a></h4>
 <p>Three seemingly unrelated reports share an underlying enforcement-architecture logic:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SfU22</strong> creates a geographic-restriction regime for inhibited aliens (internal enforcement)</li>
@@ -6722,14 +6722,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-sfu22--tu19--cu27--enforcement-identity-border-triangle">2. <strong
 <li><strong>CU27</strong> requires tightened identity verification for property registration (financial enforcement)
 Together they represent a <strong>state-capacity build-out</strong> in identity, mobility, and border control. This is the <em>operational</em> expression of the Tidöavtal's security chapter.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap">3. <strong>KU32 ↔ KU33 — The Dual <em>Vilande</em> Trap</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap">3. <strong>KU32 ↔ KU33 — The Dual <em>Vilande</em> Trap</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ku32--ku33--the-dual-vilande-trap"></a></h4>
 <p>Both amendments are <em>vilande</em> constitutional amendments under Regeringsformen 8:14 — they lapse unless the <strong>next Riksdag</strong> passes them again in <strong>identical wording</strong>. Adopted together, they function as a <strong>two-sided handover brief</strong>: the incoming government cannot reverse them as ordinary law, and failure to re-affirm is politically costly (forces explicit rejection of disability accessibility in the case of KU32, or press-freedom alignment in the case of KU33). See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> for game-theoretic treatment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack">4. <strong>TU21 ↔ CU28 — The Digital-ID Stack</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack">4. <strong>TU21 ↔ CU28 — The Digital-ID Stack</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tu21--cu28--the-digital-id-stack"></a></h4>
 <p>State e-ID (TU21) + national housing register (CU28) together form a <strong>digital-administrative stack</strong> that will reshape how Swedes interact with public services 2026–2029. The digital housing register requires a trusted identity layer; state e-ID provides that layer without BankID's commercial contract. Together they displace €400M+ in annual private-sector workflow intermediation — a market that Swedish banks and proptech have controlled for a decade.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17">5. <strong>FiU48 ↔ HD024082/HD024098 (Motions of 2026-04-17)</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17">5. <strong>FiU48 ↔ HD024082/HD024098 (Motions of 2026-04-17)</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-fiu48--hd024082hd024098-motions-of-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p>The S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) counter-motions on fuel tax were already filed during the prior motions cycle (14–17 April 2026, see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>../motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a>). FiU48's committee adoption on 2026-04-21 is the <strong>government's procedural reply</strong>: the committee majority rejected both counter-motions and advanced the government proposal. This compresses the motion-to-vote cycle to <strong>4 parliamentary days</strong> — the fastest cycle since the 2022 energy-crisis emergency budget.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--external-legislative-linkages">🌍 External Legislative Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--external-legislative-linkages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-legislative-linkages">🌍 External Legislative Linkages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-legislative-linkages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6777,7 +6777,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--external-legislative-linkages">🌍 External Legislative Linkages<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Betänkande</th><th>EU instrument / international</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Energy Tax Directive 2003/96/EC</td><td>Compliance at floor</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td>ECHR Protocol 4 Art. 2, Art. 5</td><td>Pending legal challenge</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>eIDAS2 Regulation (EU) 2024/1183</td><td>Deadline 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU22</td><td>Tachograph Regulation (EU) 2020/1054</td><td>In compliance, enforcement gap</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>EU Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC</td><td>Aligns</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>CAP Regulation (EU) 2021/2115</td><td>Eco-scheme underperformance</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>CRPD (UN Convention Rights of Persons with Disabilities)</td><td>Strengthens Art. 9 compliance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier">🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026 Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier">🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026 Dossier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6806,7 +6806,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-cycles-in-the-2026-dossier">🧩 Related Cycles in the 2026
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cycle</th><th>Relation to 2026-04-21 committee reports</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>2026-04-14 → 04-17 motions</strong></td><td>Counter-motions to FiU48 cluster; 4-party immigration opposition to SfU22 lineage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-21 interpellations</strong></td><td>Ministerial accountability on SfU22 enforcement + FiU48 fiscal pathway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-04-14 propositions</strong></td><td>Prop. 2025/26:220 → direct ancestor of HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026-03-20 → 04-10 committee reports</strong></td><td>KU32/KU33 rapporteur drafts; FiU48 Lagrådet timeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../motions/cross-reference-map.md</code></a> for the reciprocal view.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lineage-confidence">🔎 Lineage Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lineage-confidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lineage-confidence">🔎 Lineage Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lineage-confidence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>FiU48 → Prop. 220</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (explicit in betänkande)</li>
 <li><strong>SfU22 → Prop. 214</strong>: 🟩 HIGH (explicit)</li>
@@ -6817,11 +6817,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--lineage-confidence">🔎 Lineage Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-28 (after kammaren votes on FiU48 + SfU22)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports workflow
 <strong>Purpose</strong>: Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Methodology Reflection, transparently report method, data depth, confidence calibration, known gaps, and deviation rationale.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--methodologies-applied">🧭 Methodologies Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--methodologies-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodologies-applied">🧭 Methodologies Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodologies-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6863,7 +6863,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--methodologies-applied">🧭 Methodologies Applied<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology guide</th><th>Applied in</th><th>Version consulted</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a></td><td>All outputs — quality gates, evidence density, data-depth confidence ceiling</td><td>v5.0</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md"><code>political-classification-guide.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></td><td>v2.3</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md"><code>political-risk-methodology.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></td><td>v2.2</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md"><code>political-threat-framework.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> — <strong>Political Threat Taxonomy + Attack Trees + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + ICO</strong></td><td>v3.2</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md"><code>political-swot-framework.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></td><td>v2.3</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-style-guide.md"><code>political-style-guide.md</code></a></td><td>All outputs — intelligence-grade writing + evidence density + cui bono</td><td>v2.2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-templates-applied">Templates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-templates-applied"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-templates-applied">Templates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-templates-applied"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6907,7 +6907,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-templates-applied">Templates Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Template</th><th>Applied in</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/per-file-political-intelligence.md"><code>per-file-political-intelligence.md</code></a></td><td><code>documents/HD01*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/political-classification.md"><code>political-classification.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md"><code>stakeholder-impact.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--data-depth--confidence-calibration">📊 Data Depth &#x26; Confidence Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--data-depth--confidence-calibration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-depth--confidence-calibration">📊 Data Depth &#x26; Confidence Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-depth--confidence-calibration"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §Data Availability Prerequisites:</p>
 
 
@@ -6969,10 +6969,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--data-depth--confidence-calibration">📊 Data Depth &#x26; Confidenc
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th align="center">Data depth</th><th align="center">Permitted confidence ceiling</th><th align="center">Confidence used</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU22</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td align="center">FULL-TEXT</td><td align="center">HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td align="center">SUMMARY</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19–21</td><td align="center">SUMMARY</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27, CU28</td><td align="center">SUMMARY</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16, TU22, SkU23, SfU20, KU42, KU43, TU19</td><td align="center">METADATA-ONLY</td><td align="center">LOW / VERY LOW</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance">Confidence-Ceiling Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance">Confidence-Ceiling Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-ceiling-compliance"></a></h4>
 <p>No analysis in this batch exceeds its permitted confidence ceiling. Per-document analyses for METADATA-ONLY documents carry explicit <code>Confidence: LOW</code> labels.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd">✅ Quality-Gate Compliance (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd">✅ Quality-Gate Compliance (per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7035,7 +7035,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--quality-gate-compliance-per-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd">✅ Quality-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gate</th><th>Requirement</th><th align="center">Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Evidence density — per-file</td><td>≥3 evidence points, ≥2 dok_id citations, ≥2 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence density — synthesis</td><td>≥10 evidence points, ≥5 dok_id, ≥5 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence density — risk</td><td>≥5 points, ≥3 dok_id, ≥3 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Evidence density — threat</td><td>≥6 points, ≥3 dok_id, ≥3 named actors</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Mermaid diagrams</td><td>≥1 per major output</td><td align="center">✅ (all top-level files)</td></tr><tr><td>No STRIDE usage</td><td>Replaced with Political Threat Taxonomy</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Anti-pattern check</td><td>No "No strengths identified", no generic boilerplate, no title-as-finding</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labelling</td><td>Every major claim has 🟩 / 🟨 / 🟥 label</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-methodology linkage</td><td>Threat ↔ Risk ↔ SWOT ↔ Scenario links in place</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>Depth indicators</td><td>≥3 of 5 (cui bono, second-order, historical, counter-factual, tension)</td><td align="center">✅ (all 5 used)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-known-gaps">🕳️ Known Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-known-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-known-gaps">🕳️ Known Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-gaps"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Vote records not yet available</strong> — Kammaren floor votes for this batch are scheduled 2026-04-22 / 04-23 / 04-24 / 04-28 / 04-29. Coalition-mathematics projections rely on committee-stage positions + historical analogues. Post-vote reconciliation needed 2026-04-30.</p>
@@ -7057,14 +7057,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-known-gaps">🕳️ Known Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--method-deviations">🧪 Method Deviations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--method-deviations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-method-deviations">🧪 Method Deviations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-method-deviations"></a></h3>
 <p>None material. Specifically:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Threat analysis explicitly <strong>does not use STRIDE</strong> per <code>political-threat-framework.md</code> §Purpose ("This framework deliberately avoids STRIDE"). A prior version of this file (commit <code>0ae623d</code>) used STRIDE; it has been rewritten in this run to comply.</li>
 <li>All scenario probabilities use Bayesian framing per <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code> rather than point-estimate only.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--iterative-improvement-log">🔁 Iterative Improvement Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--iterative-improvement-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-iterative-improvement-log">🔁 Iterative Improvement Log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-iterative-improvement-log"></a></h3>
 <p>Per the project's <strong>AI FIRST</strong> principle (never accept first-pass quality), the following improvement passes were performed in this run:</p>
 
 
@@ -7118,7 +7118,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--iterative-improvement-log">🔁 Iterative Improvement Log<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Pass</th><th>Focus</th><th>Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Inventory existing artifacts</td><td>Identified 8 missing top-level files + 5 missing per-document analyses + 1 non-compliant threat analysis</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Methodology consult</td><td>Read <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>, <code>political-threat-framework.md</code>, <code>political-risk-methodology.md</code>, <code>political-swot-framework.md</code>, <code>political-classification-guide.md</code>, <code>political-style-guide.md</code>, <code>templates/README.md</code>, <code>templates/per-file-political-intelligence.md</code>, <code>templates/threat-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Create missing top-level (5)</td><td>executive-brief, classification-results, cross-reference-map, coalition-mathematics, comparative-international</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Rewrite threat-analysis (compliance)</td><td>Replaced STRIDE with Political Threat Taxonomy + Attack Trees + Kill Chain + Diamond Model + ICO</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Create remaining top-level (3)</td><td>historical-baseline, scenario-analysis, methodology-reflection (this file)</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Per-document depth (5)</td><td>HD01KU32, HD01KU33, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD01TU16 analyses</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Article linkage</td><td>EN + SV articles updated with clickable links to every artifact</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Quality review</td><td>This document</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity">🧩 Cross-Check Against Motions Dossier Parity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity">🧩 Cross-Check Against Motions Dossier Parity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity"></a></h3>
 <p>The motions cycle for the prior week (2026-04-14 → 04-17) produced 18 analysis files. This committee-reports cycle now produces 20 analysis files (17 top-level + per-document):</p>
 
 
@@ -7242,7 +7242,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-check-against-motions-dossier-parity">🧩 Cross-Check Against
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th align="center">motions/</th><th align="center">committeeReports/ (before)</th><th align="center">committeeReports/ (this run)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>executive-brief.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>classification-results.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>cross-reference-map.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>coalition-mathematics.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>comparative-international.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>historical-baseline.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>methodology-reflection.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>synthesis-summary.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅ (carried forward)</td></tr><tr><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅ (STRIDE)</td><td align="center">✅ (rewritten compliant)</td></tr><tr><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>election-2026-implications.md</td><td align="center">n/a</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>economic-data.json</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>data-download-manifest.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>README.md</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">❌</td><td align="center">(future work)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Parity status</strong>: ACHIEVED for all mandatory analysis dimensions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lessons-for-future-cycles">🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lessons-for-future-cycles"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-for-future-cycles">🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-for-future-cycles"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Do not allow a news-articles run to begin before the analysis parity check</strong> — this cycle's issue originated in a prior "Analysis Only" run that produced only 10 files instead of the full 18-file set.</p>
@@ -7260,7 +7260,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lessons-for-future-cycles">🎓 Lessons for Future Cycles<a class=""
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH on method compliance; 🟨 MEDIUM on forward-looking claims.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 15:36 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_betankanden, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Scope of this file</strong>: raw data downloaded by the <strong>data-only downloader</strong>. This is <strong>not</strong> the analysis-selection set. The full analysis dossier in this directory covers a broader <strong>14-report week package</strong> that includes reports adopted 2026-04-14 → 2026-04-21 as surfaced by the news-committee-reports workflow; see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a> for the complete analysis set.
@@ -7280,7 +7280,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 the preceding committee week. Both selections are intentional; they serve different
 pipeline stages.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -7290,16 +7290,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md"><code>election-2026-implications.md</code></a></em></p>
+<h2 id="rm-election-2026-implications-7">Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications-7"></a></h2>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-committee-reports | <strong>Framework</strong>: v5.0 Election Lens<br>
 <strong>Updated</strong>: 14:45 UTC — HD01FiU48 (extra ändringsbudget) added as primary electoral document</p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview-1">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview-2">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-2"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 2026 committee reports batch arrives with approximately 5 months until Sweden's general election (September 14, 2026). An extraordinary supplementary budget with fuel tax relief and energy price support now sits alongside the migration enforcement reform as co-leading electoral stories — together they define the government's strategic bet for the final campaign stretch.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-matrix">Electoral Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-matrix">Electoral Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "Tier 1 — Very High Electoral Impact"
     FiU48["FiU48: Fuel tax cut + energy relief\n🟦 VERY HIGH — 5.7M drivers affected"]
@@ -7327,8 +7327,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-matrix">Electoral Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
     style MJU21 fill:#ff8800,color:#fff
     style Others fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment">Document-by-Document Electoral Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment">Document-by-Document Electoral Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-by-document-electoral-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget: Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟦VERY HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH — This is the most direct voter benefit in the April 2026 batch. The fuel tax cut of 82 öre/liter for petrol and 319 SEK/m³ for diesel (May 1 – September 30) will be felt at every Swedish petrol station. With approximately 5.7 million licensed drivers and Sweden's relatively high commute-by-car rates in rural and suburban areas, this measure disproportionately benefits the government's suburban and rural voter bases.</p>
 <p><strong>The numbers</strong>: Based on average Swedish petrol consumption of ~40 liters/month for a family car, a typical driver saves approximately 33 SEK/month on fuel, or 165 SEK over May-September. Diesel-heavy users (tradespeople, truck operators) see larger absolute savings. The electricity/gas price support covers January-February 2026 heating bills — adding direct household relief for the winter period.</p>
@@ -7347,7 +7347,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-relief">H
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong>: If fuel relief extends beyond September 2026, Sweden falls into a structural low-fossil-fuel-tax regime that undermines climate policy for years.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten">HD01SfU22 — Inhibition av verkställigheten<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten">HD01SfU22 — Inhibition av verkställigheten<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: VERY HIGH — Migration is consistently Sweden's #2 voter concern (after economy). The inhibition reform directly replaces a humanitarian protection mechanism with a surveillance-enforcement mechanism. SD will campaign: "We delivered — no more residence through the back door." S will counter: "A cruel system that abandons people in legal limbo."</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong>:</p>
@@ -7364,24 +7364,24 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu22--inhibition-av-verkställigheten">HD01SfU22 — Inhibition
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Policy Legacy</strong>: If upheld legally, becomes permanent architecture change; future S-led government inherits enforcement machinery.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande">HD01KU32/KU33 — Constitutional Amendments (vilande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande">HD01KU32/KU33 — Constitutional Amendments (vilande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32ku33--constitutional-amendments-vilande"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (constitutional mechanics well-established)</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: MEDIUM but constitutionally unique — Both amendments are adopted "vilande" (pending), meaning the <strong>next</strong> Riksdag after the September 2026 election must re-affirm identical wording. This creates an extraordinary situation: the September 2026 election result directly determines whether KU32 (accessibility requirements for protected media) and KU33 (digital seizure not classified as public records) become law in 2027.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Stakes</strong>: Parties cannot simply reverse these changes — they need to explicitly campaign against re-affirmation. Opposition (S, V, MP) could campaign against KU33 if they view it as restricting press freedom transparency in criminal investigations.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation">HD01TU21 — En statlig e-legitimation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation">HD01TU21 — En statlig e-legitimation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu21--en-statlig-e-legitimation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: MEDIUM — Not a hot-button issue, but digital inclusion resonates with elderly voters (≈22% of electorate) and immigrant communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Scenarios</strong>: Rare cross-party consensus item; all parties can claim credit.</p>
 <p><strong>Campaign Use</strong>: Government can highlight as "modernizing Sweden's digital infrastructure" — positive legacy.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning">HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionens rapport om jordbrukets klimatomställning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21--riksrevisionens-rapport-om-jordbrukets-klimatomställning"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral Impact</strong>: MEDIUM — Sensitive for C-party rural voter base. Green voters (MP, V) want stronger action; farmers (C/SD rural) fear binding conditions.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition Risk</strong>: C-party may distance from government if binding agricultural conditions perceived as hostile to farming communities.</p>
 <p><strong>Agricultural Sweden in numbers</strong>: 66,000 active farms; 180,000 employed in agriculture; 13% of national GHG emissions; €1.2B annual CAP receipts.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment">Composite Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment">Composite Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7425,7 +7425,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-composite-electoral-risk-assessment">Composite Electoral Risk Assessm
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Theme</th><th>Risk for Coalition</th><th>Risk for Opposition</th><th>Net Effect</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal relief (FiU48)</td><td>"Populist" label risk; budget impact</td><td>Can't easily oppose — damages working-class appeal</td><td>Strong net positive for coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Migration enforcement (SfU22)</td><td>ECHR failure = HIGH risk</td><td>"Too cruel" = MEDIUM risk</td><td>Favors coalition if implemented cleanly</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional lock-in (KU32, KU33)</td><td>LOW — cross-party majority</td><td>LOW</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>Digital modernization (TU21)</td><td>LOW — cross-party support</td><td>LOW</td><td>Neutral or slightly positive</td></tr><tr><td>Agriculture climate (MJU21)</td><td>MEDIUM — rural voter sensitivity</td><td>MEDIUM — climate ambition insufficient</td><td>Political stalemate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election">Key Strategic Indicators (Track Before Sept 2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election">Key Strategic Indicators (Track Before Sept 2026 Election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Petrol price polling</strong> — does FiU48 register as "government helped with cost of living"? (CRITICAL for election narrative)</li>
 <li><strong>Migration Court of Appeal ruling</strong> on first SfU22 inhibition order (expected Q3 2026) — CRITICAL</li>
@@ -7436,12 +7436,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-strategic-indicators-track-before-sept-2026-election">Key Strateg
 <li><strong>September 2026 budget debate</strong> — will fuel relief be extended or reversed?</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-baseline"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">🎯 Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>, every significance claim requires comparative grounding. This document anchors the 2026-04-21 package against twelve prior spring committee weeks to answer: <strong>is this cycle ordinary, elevated, or historically anomalous?</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026">📊 Spring Committee-Week Baselines 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026">📊 Spring Committee-Week Baselines 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026"></a></h3>
 <p>Indexed to mid-April committee weeks (~T-20 weeks to mid-term, ~T-20 weeks before general elections in election years).</p>
 
 
@@ -7577,12 +7577,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--spring-committee-week-baselines-20142026">📊 Spring Committee-Week
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Year</th><th>Riksmöte</th><th align="center">Reports adopted</th><th align="center">Top-story significance</th><th align="center">Fiscal emergency</th><th align="center">Constitutional <em>vilande</em></th><th align="center">Pre-election?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013/14</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">18/25 — Gender-equality labour reform</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">1 (inheritance)</td><td align="center">✅ Yes</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>2014/15</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">16/25 — Migration dialogue</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>2015/16</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">20/25 — Refugee crisis response package</td><td align="center">Yes (+3.2B SEK)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>2016/17</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">17/25 — Industrial policy</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">1 (<em>vilande</em> press freedom)</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>2017/18</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">19/25 — Pension reform + A-kassa</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ Yes</td></tr><tr><td>2019</td><td>2018/19</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">14/25 — Budget transition</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2020</td><td>2019/20</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">21/25 — COVID emergency measures</td><td align="center">Yes (+12B SEK)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2021</td><td>2020/21</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">19/25 — Post-pandemic recovery</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2022</td><td>2021/22</td><td align="center">17</td><td align="center">22/25 — Energy-crisis subsidies (HögElPris)</td><td align="center">Yes (+6.0B SEK)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ Yes</td></tr><tr><td>2023</td><td>2022/23</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">18/25 — Tidöavtal first-wave bills</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2024</td><td>2023/24</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">17/25 — NATO implementation</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">1 (territorial integrity)</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td>2025</td><td>2024/25</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">18/25 — Energy security + digital ID precursor</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026</strong></td><td><strong>2025/26</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>14</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>22/25 — FiU48 fuel/energy + SfU22 migration (tied)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Yes (+4.1B SEK)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>2 (KU32 + KU33)</strong></td><td align="center">✅ <strong>Yes</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Data sourced from riksdagen.se <em>riksdagsprotokoll</em> archive and verified against committee secretariat year-in-review briefings.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context">🔎 Position of 2026-04-21 in Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025">1. <strong>Volume is average</strong> (14 reports vs 13.4 mean 2014–2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context">🔎 Position of 2026-04-21 in Historical Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-position-of-2026-04-21-in-historical-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025">1. <strong>Volume is average</strong> (14 reports vs 13.4 mean 2014–2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-volume-is-average-14-reports-vs-134-mean-20142025"></a></h4>
 <p>The report count itself is unremarkable. The concentration at the top of the significance matrix is not.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225">2. <strong>Top-story significance is tied for highest since 2014</strong> (22/25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225">2. <strong>Top-story significance is tied for highest since 2014</strong> (22/25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-top-story-significance-is-tied-for-highest-since-2014-2225"></a></h4>
 <p>Equals only 2022 (HögElPris energy-crisis subsidies during the Russian energy shock). 2022 and 2026 are the <strong>only two spring cycles</strong> to combine a <strong>>2B SEK supplementary budget with a pre-election timing window ≤5 months</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented">3. <strong>Triple-pillar convergence is unprecedented</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented">3. <strong>Triple-pillar convergence is unprecedented</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented"></a></h4>
 <p>No prior spring cycle 2014–2025 contains all three of:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Election-year supplementary budget (>2B SEK) ✅ FiU48</li>
@@ -7590,7 +7590,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-triple-pillar-convergence-is-unprecedented">3. <strong>Triple-pilla
 <li>Dual <em>vilande</em> constitutional amendments ✅ KU32 + KU33</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The closest precedents each feature <strong>one</strong> of these: 2022 (supplementary budget only), 2017 (single <em>vilande</em> only), 2023 (enforcement flagship only without fiscal).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed">4. <strong>The fiscal-then-election interval is extraordinarily compressed</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed">4. <strong>The fiscal-then-election interval is extraordinarily compressed</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7628,10 +7628,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-the-fiscal-then-election-interval-is-extraordinarily-compressed">4.
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Year</th><th align="center">Supplementary budget size</th><th align="center">Months to election</th><th align="center">Structural continuation?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2016</td><td align="center">3.2B SEK</td><td align="center">Non-election</td><td align="center">N/A</td></tr><tr><td>2020</td><td align="center">12.0B SEK</td><td align="center">Non-election</td><td align="center">Yes (pandemic)</td></tr><tr><td>2022</td><td align="center">6.0B SEK</td><td align="center">6 months to Sept 2022 election</td><td align="center">Partial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>4.1B SEK</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≤5 months to 14 Sept 2026</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Unknown (sunset 30 Sept)</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>The 4.1B SEK FiU48 package matures (sunsets) <strong>14 days after</strong> the election — a structural feature absent from every comparable precedent. This is the <strong>single most politically compressed fiscal cycle of the 2014–2026 era</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare">5. <strong><em>Vilande</em> amendment dual-adoption is rare</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare">5. <strong><em>Vilande</em> amendment dual-adoption is rare</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-vilande-amendment-dual-adoption-is-rare"></a></h4>
 <p>Since 1974 (Regeringsformen adoption), only <strong>six</strong> spring committee weeks have adopted two <em>vilande</em> amendments simultaneously: 1979, 1988, 1998, 2006, 2017, <strong>2026</strong>. The 2017 cycle is the most recent analogue — its two <em>vilande</em> amendments had an 85% and 70% re-affirmation rate respectively.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring">📈 Comparative Series — Coalition Fiscal Activism (Election-Year Spring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring">📈 Comparative Series — Coalition Fiscal Activism (Election-Year Spring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     Y2014["2014 (S-MP oppositionens år)&#x3C;br/>No spring supplementary"]
     Y2018["2018 (S-MP gov)&#x3C;br/>No spring supplementary"]
@@ -7645,7 +7645,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--comparative-series--coalition-fiscal-activism-election-year-spring">
     style Base fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
 <p><strong>Finding</strong>: Election-year spring supplementary budgets are <strong>rare but not unprecedented</strong>. The 2022 HögElPris package established the template (exogenous-shock-justified emergency budget during campaign build-up). FiU48 follows the 2022 template but with a <strong>weaker exogenous shock</strong> (Middle East conflict + high Jan–Feb heating costs vs the 2022 Russian gas crisis). This makes the pre-election-fiscal-populism framing <strong>harder to refute</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates">🏛️ Constitutional Baseline — <em>Vilande</em> Re-Affirmation Rates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates">🏛️ Constitutional Baseline — <em>Vilande</em> Re-Affirmation Rates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates"></a></h3>
 <p>Historical re-affirmation outcomes for <em>vilande</em> amendments passing to the next Riksdag after an intervening election:</p>
 
 
@@ -7698,7 +7698,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-constitutional-baseline--vilande-re-affirmation-rates">🏛️ Co
 <p>KU32 (media accessibility) fits the "politically consensual" class with expected ≥90% re-affirmation.
 KU33 (digital-seizure access restriction) fits the "politically-charged" class with expected 70–85% re-affirmation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for">🧭 What This Cycle Is <em>Not</em> Precedented For<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for">🧭 What This Cycle Is <em>Not</em> Precedented For<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for"></a></h3>
 <p>Claims that would <em>exceed</em> historical baselines and require additional evidence before publication:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Unprecedented fiscal-political cycle" — overstates: 2022 is comparable</li>
@@ -7707,7 +7707,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--what-this-cycle-is-not-precedented-for">🧭 What This Cycle Is <em>
 <li>❌ "Most ECHR-exposed migration reform in Swedish history" — 2015–2016 emergency law package was arguably more exposed</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Historical Framings (Verified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified">🎙️ Newsroom-Grade Historical Framings (Verified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7745,7 +7745,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-newsroom-grade-historical-framings-verified">🎙️ Newsroom-Gra
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Tied for highest-significance spring committee cycle in 12 years"</td><td>§Position table</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Only the second election-year spring supplementary budget since 2014"</td><td>§Comparative Series</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Sweden's sixth dual-<em>vilande</em> spring cycle since 1974"</td><td>§Constitutional Baseline</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Fiscal-election interval is the most compressed since 2022 — and narrower because the sunset precedes the election by only 14 days"</td><td>§Position §4</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Historic <em>vilande</em> re-affirmation rate is 84%; KU33 falls in the lower-rate class"</td><td>§Constitutional Baseline</td><td align="center">🟨 MEDIUM (small-n classification)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--related-analyses-1">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--related-analyses-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-related-analyses-1">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-related-analyses-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a> — synthesised newsroom summary</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> — peer-jurisdiction baselines</li>
@@ -7754,6 +7754,39 @@ <h2 id="rm--related-analyses-1">🔗 Related Analyses<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH on aggregate counts; 🟨 MEDIUM on top-story significance re-scoring for pre-2020 cycles (retrospective methodology reconstruction).</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU42-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU43-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU19-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU21-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/election-2026-implications.md"><code>election-2026-implications.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -7807,7 +7840,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:07.220Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:28.619Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html b/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html
index fcf099de1d..984beb4105 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.562Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:28.976Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.562Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:28.976Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three","description":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three simultaneous high-stakes policy developments. Finance Committee FiU48 — an extraordinary 4.1 billion SEK supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:07.562Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10440.json","name":"documents/hd10440.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10441.json","name":"documents/hd10441.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10442.json","name":"documents/hd10442.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11730.json","name":"documents/hd11730.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11731.json","name":"documents/hd11731.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11732.json","name":"documents/hd11732.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three","description":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three simultaneous high-stakes policy developments. Finance Committee FiU48 — an extraordinary 4.1 billion SEK supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:28.976Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10440.json","name":"documents/hd10440.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10441.json","name":"documents/hd10441.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10442.json","name":"documents/hd10442.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11730.json","name":"documents/hd11730.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11731.json","name":"documents/hd11731.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11732.json","name":"documents/hd11732.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,21 +196,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Package</strong>: EVE-2026-04-21 | <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three simultaneous high-stakes policy developments. Finance Committee FiU48 — an extraordinary 4.1 billion SEK supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes to the EU's legal minimum and providing direct energy price support — moved to chamber vote (expected 2026-04-22), delivering tangible household relief to approximately 9 million Swedes at a moment when GDP growth stands at only 0.82% and unemployment has risen to 8.69%. Simultaneously, the government launched a new law requiring wind turbine operators to share revenues with nearby residents — a policy designed to convert local opposition (NIMBY) to support (YIMBY) for Sweden's renewable energy expansion. These two moves together define the coalition's "affordability and green transition" pre-election narrative.</p>
 <p>The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) faced a public KU open hearing (G16) on fiscal governance, while former Foreign Minister Margot Wallström (S) faced her own KU hearing (G34) on prior government foreign policy decisions — keeping both coalition and opposition under constitutional scrutiny. The opposition response was a coordinated accountability offensive: three new interpellations targeting Svantesson, Britz, and Strömmer were filed today, adding to a 21-motion policy blitz launched last week. The EU clock is also ticking: Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson has 47 days to transpose the EU Pay Transparency Directive or face infringement proceedings. <strong>145 days remain to the September 13, 2026 election.</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial decision</strong>: Publish FiU48 as lead story immediately in EN + SV — affects 9M citizens directly</li>
 <li><strong>Monitoring decision</strong>: Track FiU48 chamber vote (2026-04-22/23) and any L party dissent as coalition stability signal</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis decision</strong>: Flag EU Pay Directive breach (June 7 deadline) as escalating risk requiring dedicated tracking</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>FiU48 fuel tax cut</strong>: Finance Committee approved extra budget reducing petrol tax by 82 öre/l and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ through September 2026; chamber vote imminent</li>
 <li>⚡ <strong>Energy price support</strong>: 4.1B SEK total including household el- och gasprisstöd for ~3M households facing elevated energy costs</li>
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-
 <li>🌍 <strong>Gaza flotilla</strong>: Denis Begic (S) presses Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard on protecting Swedish citizens joining international Gaza civilian convoy</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders">Named Actors (≥5 ministers/party leaders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders">Named Actors (≥5 ministers/party leaders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders">Named Actors (≥5 ministers/p
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Significance Today</th><th>dok_id</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong></td><td>Finance Minister</td><td>FiU48 architect + KU G16 hearing + HD10442 + HD11732</td><td>HD01FiU48, KU G16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Britz (L)</strong></td><td>Acting Climate/Labour Minister</td><td>Vindkraft law announcement + HD10440 interpellation</td><td>gov/vindkraft, HD10440</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</strong></td><td>Justice Minister</td><td>HD10441 on rättssäkerhet; SiS visit</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson (L)</strong></td><td>Gender Equality Minister</td><td>EU Pay Directive 47-day deadline</td><td>(from interpellations analysis)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong></td><td>Foreign Minister</td><td>HD11731 Gaza flotilla accountability</td><td>HD11731</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Margot Wallström (S)</strong></td><td>Former Foreign Minister</td><td>KU G34 constitutional hearing</td><td>KU G34</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson (KD)</strong></td><td>Infrastructure Minister</td><td>9 accumulated interpellations</td><td>(from interpellations analysis)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Markus Kallifatides (S)</strong></td><td>MP, opposition</td><td>HD10442 filed today</td><td>HD10442</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johanna Haraldsson (S)</strong></td><td>MP, opposition</td><td>HD10440 + HD11732 same day</td><td>HD10440, HD11732</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22">Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22">Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22">Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watch Point</th><th>What to Monitor</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>Vote count — L party bloc discipline</td><td>Coalition stability test</td></tr><tr><td>L party communications</td><td>Any public reservations on fuel tax</td><td>Internal fracture signal</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission statement</td><td>Any reaction to Sweden's fuel tax minimum</td><td>External pressure</td></tr><tr><td>Interpellation responses scheduled</td><td>Strömmer, Britz, Svantesson responses</td><td>Minister credibility metrics</td></tr><tr><td>New opposition filings</td><td>Any follow-up motions to 21-motion wave</td><td>Opposition escalation assessment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>EU Pay Transparency infringement proceedings</td><td>16</td><td>47 days</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>EU fossil subsidy challenge (FiU48)</td><td>15</td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>KU G16 formal observation on Svantesson</td><td>12</td><td>2026-05-05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Gaza flotilla incident — Swedish citizens</td><td>8</td><td>Immediate</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>L party abstention FiU48 → coalition fracture</td><td>10</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-meter">Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-meter">Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -409,17 +409,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-meter">Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 content and significance</td><td>🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law policy intent</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition coordination assessment</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU legal risk analysis</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>KU hearing outcomes</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM (not yet concluded)</td></tr><tr><td>Chamber vote result</td><td>🟩 HIGH (predicted: passes 175+)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <img src="https://hack23.com/icon-192.png" alt="Hack23 Logo" width="96" height="96">
 </p>
-<h2 align="center" id="rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h2 align="center" id="rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
 <p align="center">
   <strong>Fuel Tax Election Gamble · Constitutional Hearings · Opposition Accountability Offensive</strong><br>
   <em>Tuesday 2026-04-21 | Riksmöte 2025/26 | Deep Analysis</em>
 </p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--synthesis-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-metadata"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Synthesis ID</strong></td><td><code>SYN-2026-04-21-EVE001</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 18:30 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>8 (direct) + 55 (via sibling analysis cross-reference)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 (plus integrated sibling analysis: CR, MOT, IP, RT-1353)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-evening-analysis agentic workflow v5.0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH 🟩</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Days to Election</strong></td><td>~145 days (September 13, 2026)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph "📊 Evening Analysis Intelligence Dashboard — 2026-04-21"
         direction TB
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-
     style KU fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#E65100,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Electoral Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>FiU48: 4.1B SEK extra budget</strong> — fuel tax cut (82 öre/l) + energy price support benefits ~9M citizens. Coalition election-year "affordability" move at EU fossil minimum</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td><strong>10/10</strong></td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>VERY HIGH</strong> — direct household relief before election</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>KU constitutional hearings</strong> — Svantesson (G16) + Wallström (G34) in annual granskning. Any critical observations could damage coalition's fiscal governance narrative</td><td>HDC220260421ou1/ou2</td><td>8/10</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — constitutional accountability</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>21-motion opposition coordination</strong> — S/V/MP/C filed counter-motions to government immigration bills within 72 hours. Unprecedented multi-party coordination signals opposition's 2026 campaign architecture</td><td>HD024076-HD024089</td><td>9/10</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>VERY HIGH</strong> — electoral campaign launched</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>Eating disorder care crisis</strong> (HD10442) — Kallifatides (S) presses Svantesson about Region Stockholm's failure to provide care. Cross-party concern about private welfare operator failures</td><td>HD10442</td><td>7/10</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> — welfare state credibility</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>Gaza flotilla accountability</strong> (HD11731) — Denis Begic (S) presses Maria Malmer Stenergard on protecting Swedish citizens participating in Gaza civilian convoy. Foreign policy human rights dimension</td><td>HD11731</td><td>6/10</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — foreign policy accountability</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-swot-summary">🗂️ SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-swot-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-summary">🗂️ SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-swot-summary">🗂️ SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Coalition (Tidöalliansen)</th><th>Opposition (S/V/MP/C)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Strengths)</strong></td><td>FiU48 delivers tangible relief; 175-seat majority intact; vindkraft adds green credibility</td><td>Coordinated messaging architecture; EU legal deadlines become attack vectors; 21-motion platform</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W (Weaknesses)</strong></td><td>FiU48 conflicts with climate law §5 (Klimatlagen); L internal tension possible; KU hearings expose fiscal process</td><td>S silent on deportation = credibility gap; M/SD attacks incoming on "chaos coalition" risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O (Opportunities)</strong></td><td>FiU48 + vindkraft dual narrative pre-positions for September; SiS reform shows institutional care commitment</td><td>KU G16 findings could damage Svantesson; EU infringement on Pay Directive (47-day deadline) creates external pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T (Threats)</strong></td><td>EU Commission fossil subsidy challenge; energy price collapse before vote undermines justification; +0.3-0.5 MtCO₂e climate regression</td><td>Opposition must avoid appearing obstructionist on affordability; "chaos coalition" framing if too coordinated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-landscape">📈 Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape">📈 Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-landscape">📈 Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01</td><td>FiU48 undermines Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5 — EU Commission scrutiny</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>R02</td><td>L party dissent on fuel tax clause → coalition fracture</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>0-3 days</td></tr><tr><td>R03</td><td>KU G16 produces formal observation on Svantesson's fiscal process</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>R04</td><td>Opposition 21-motion coordination becomes S "chaos coalition" liability</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>3-6 months</td></tr><tr><td>R05</td><td>EU Pay Directive infringement deadline (47 days, June 7) creates crisis for Nina Larsson</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>47 days</td></tr><tr><td>R06</td><td>Gaza flotilla incident involving Swedish citizens → foreign policy emergency</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>0-30 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔮 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">🔮 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔮 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU48 chamber vote result</strong></td><td>175+ YES from M+SD+KD+L</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td><td>Coalition stability test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L party voting on fuel tax</strong></td><td>Any L abstentions on FiU48</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td><td>Internal coalition fracture signal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission monitoring</strong></td><td>Formal letter to Swedish government</td><td>2-4 weeks</td><td>External climate pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU G16 draft report</strong></td><td>Svantesson fiscal governance observations</td><td>2026-05-05 est.</td><td>Constitutional accountability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson EU deadline</strong></td><td>Transposition or infringement</td><td>2026-06-07</td><td>EU law compliance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition interpellation responses</strong></td><td>Strömmer/Britz/Svantesson reply</td><td>2026-04-28 est.</td><td>Minister accountability metrics</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--artifacts-inventory">📦 Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--artifacts-inventory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-artifacts-inventory">📦 Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-artifacts-inventory"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--artifacts-inventory">📦 Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Artifact</th><th>Status</th><th>Size (bytes)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>synthesis-summary.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~8,000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~5,000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>classification-results.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~3,500</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~3,000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~6,000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cross-reference-map.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>data-download-manifest.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~2,500</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>README.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~3,500</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>executive-brief.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~5,000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>comparative-international.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~5,000</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>methodology-reflection.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -831,12 +831,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a
 <hr>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor AI Evening Analysis — Classification: PUBLIC — See full artifacts inventory above</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SIG-ID</strong>: SIG-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Scoring Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix">5-Dimension Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix">5-Dimension Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "Significance Scoring — Evening Analysis 2026-04-21"
         A["🗳️ Electoral Impact&#x3C;br/>Score: 10/10&#x3C;br/>FiU48 = direct voter relief&#x3C;br/>Opposition 21-motion architecture"] 
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix">5-Dimension Scoring Matrix<a class="" ari
     D -.->|"Weight 15%"| COMP
     E -.->|"Weight 10%"| COMP</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-significance-scores">Per-Document Significance Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-significance-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-significance-scores">Per-Document Significance Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-significance-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-significance-scores">Per-Document Significance Scores<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Electoral</th><th>Constitutional</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>International</th><th>Precedent</th><th><strong>Composite</strong></th><th>DIW Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>10</td><td>7</td><td>10</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.9</strong></td><td>0.30</td></tr><tr><td>Gov/vindkraft</td><td>9</td><td>5</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.2</strong></td><td>0.18</td></tr><tr><td>KU G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.9</strong></td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442 (ätstörning)</td><td>7</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.8</strong></td><td>0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Motions 21-cluster</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>9</td><td><strong>7.3</strong></td><td>0.14</td></tr><tr><td>HD11731 (Gaza)</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.1</strong></td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441 (rättssäkerhet)</td><td>6</td><td>8</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td><strong>5.5</strong></td><td>0.05</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td><strong>2.4</strong></td><td>0.03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Day Composite Score: 8.7/10 (DIW-weighted)</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -983,13 +983,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>PUBLISH IMMEDIATELY</strong></td><td>8.7/10 composite score exceeds 6.0 publication threshold by wide margin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority Level</strong></td><td>P1 — LEAD STORY: FiU48 extra budget</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Languages</strong></td><td>EN + SV (primary); translations via news-translate workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coverage Depth</strong></td><td>Deep — 1,500-2,500 words with economic context and election implications</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>STA-ID</strong>: STA-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef citizens fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     classDef coalition fill:#C62828,color:#fff
@@ -1011,8 +1011,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     CENTER --> C7["7️⃣ JUDICIARY/CONST&#x3C;br/>Impact: HIGH&#x3C;br/>KU hearings today&#x3C;br/>Widding rättssäkerhet"]:::jud
     CENTER --> C8["8️⃣ MEDIA/PUBLIC OPINION&#x3C;br/>Impact: HIGH&#x3C;br/>Affordability narrative&#x3C;br/>Climate vs. relief frame"]:::media</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups">All 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-allmänheten">1. Citizens (Allmänheten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-allmänheten"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups">All 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-allmänheten">1. Citizens (Allmänheten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-allmänheten"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate</p>
 
 
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens-allmänheten">1. Citizens (Allmänheten)<a class="" aria-h
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sub-group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Vehicle owners (~6M)</td><td>POSITIVE — fuel cost relief</td><td>HD01FiU48: 82 öre/l petrol, 319 SEK/m³ diesel</td></tr><tr><td>Households (~3M)</td><td>POSITIVE — energy price support</td><td>HD01FiU48: el- och gasprisstöd</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm residents</td><td>NEGATIVE — police density declining</td><td>BRÅ March 2026, HD10439 (from RT-1353)</td></tr><tr><td>Women needing shelter</td><td>NEGATIVE — closures accelerating</td><td>HD10437-38 (interpellations analysis)</td></tr><tr><td>Eating disorder patients</td><td>NEGATIVE — Region Stockholm service failures</td><td>HD10442 Kallifatides → Svantesson</td></tr><tr><td>Rural residents (Vetlanda)</td><td>NEGATIVE — Skatteverket office closure</td><td>HD11732</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Key actor</strong>: Ordinary Swedish households facing high energy and fuel costs</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (Tidöalliansen: M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (Tidöalliansen: M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: 0–3 days</p>
 
 
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Tension</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong></td><td>SUPPORTS FiU48 — fiscal pragmatism</td><td>Svantesson under KU scrutiny simultaneously</td><td>HD01FiU48, KU G16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong></td><td>SUPPORTS FiU48 — affordability populism</td><td>No climate tension (SD opposes green taxation)</td><td>FiU48 support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</strong></td><td>SUPPORTS FiU48 + SiS reform</td><td>Infrastructure minister Carlson under pressure</td><td>HD01FiU48, SiS press release</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Liberalerna (L)</strong></td><td>Supports FiU48 via Britz vindkraft counterweight</td><td>Ideological climate tension, EU infringement risk</td><td>gov/vindkraft, HD10440</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Coalition message discipline holds for FiU48 vote. L internal tension real but manageable given vindkraft counterweight. Confidence: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Campaign 2026</p>
 
 
@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position on FiU48</th><th>Strategy</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>SILENT/AMBIVALENT — cannot oppose household relief</td><td>File interpellations on social welfare instead</td><td>HD10442, motions analysis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>OPPOSES — climate grounds</td><td>Immigration motion (HD024076) + climate</td><td>Motions synthesis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>STRONGLY OPPOSES FiU48</td><td>Alm Ericson HD024098; Lakso HD11730</td><td>HD11730, motions synthesis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>AMBIVALENT — rural voters need relief</td><td>Immigration pragmatist position</td><td>Motions synthesis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Opposition in strategic bind on FiU48 — welfare concerns require affordability support, climate concerns require opposition. S's silence is strategically rational. Confidence: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv">4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv">4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–12 months</p>
 
 
@@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv">4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sector</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Transport/logistics</td><td>POSITIVE — 319 SEK/m³ diesel cut</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power developers</td><td>POSITIVE — new revenue sharing framework</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td></tr><tr><td>Road haulage industry</td><td>POSITIVE — diesel cost structure improved</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Energy sector</td><td>MIXED — support for renewables + fossil stabilization</td><td>FiU48 + vindkraft</td></tr><tr><td>Rural businesses</td><td>NEGATIVE — Skatteverket Vetlanda service loss</td><td>HD11732</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Medium</p>
 
 
@@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Women's shelters</td><td>NEGATIVE — closures accelerating, pressure continues</td><td>HD10437-38 (interpellations)</td></tr><tr><td>Children's rights organizations</td><td>POSITIVE — SiS care reform improvements</td><td>2026-04-20 press release</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental groups</td><td>NEGATIVE — FiU48 climate regression</td><td>+0.3-0.5 MtCO₂e/year</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine solidarity organizations</td><td>POSITIVE — 154M SEK democracy support</td><td>2026-04-20 press release</td></tr><tr><td>Eating disorder patient groups</td><td>NEGATIVE — Region Stockholm failing on care</td><td>HD10442</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: 47 days–4 weeks</p>
 
 
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Institution</th><th>Issue</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>Pay Transparency Directive non-transposition</td><td>June 7, 2026</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>Fossil subsidy monitoring re: FiU48 fuel cut</td><td>2-4 weeks</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UN/International community</strong></td><td>Gaza flotilla — Swedish citizen protection</td><td>Immediate</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nordic partners (DK/NO/FI)</strong></td><td>Sweden joining EU fossil floor — competitive concern</td><td>Medium-term</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — EU infringement risk is structurally certain; FiU48 EU monitoring is probable</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: 2026-05-05 est.</p>
 
 
@@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Issue</th><th>Body</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU G16 Svantesson hearing</td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td><td>Formal observation possible</td><td>HDC220260421ou1</td></tr><tr><td>KU G34 Wallström hearing</td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td><td>Opposition historical exposure</td><td>HDC220260421ou2</td></tr><tr><td>Rättssäkerhetsproblem (Widding)</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>Systemic reform needed</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 ECHR compliance</td><td>Migrationsverket</td><td>Deportation legal risk</td><td>HD01SfU22</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM (depends on KU conclusions not yet published)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate</p>
 
 
@@ -1332,12 +1332,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 — Confidence: 🟩HIGH</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SCN-ID</strong>: SCN-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH across all base scenarios</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Sweden April 2026&#x3C;br/>Scenario Space))
     Base Scenarios
@@ -1348,8 +1348,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
       W1_Election[W1: Early Election Call&#x3C;br/>Coalition collapses FiU48]
       W2_EUBlock[W2: EU Emergency Block&#x3C;br/>Commission injunction]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65">B1: Smooth Coalition Passage (Probability: 65%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65">B1: Smooth Coalition Passage (Probability: 65%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: FiU48 passes chamber vote 2026-04-22 without L party defection; Vindkraft law clears committee by 2026-05-15.</p>
 <p><strong>Assumptions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65">B1: Smooth Coalition Pass
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Response</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government coalition</td><td>Unified messaging — "affordable energy"</td><td>Immediate</td></tr><tr><td>S opposition</td><td>Accept economic relief, escalate EU challenge</td><td>1 week</td></tr><tr><td>Business (SPBI, Skogsindustrierna)</td><td>Welcome diesel cut, monitor duration</td><td>2 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>Monitor, issue soft concern communiqué</td><td>30 days</td></tr><tr><td>Citizens (9M)</td><td>Immediate fuel price reduction at pump</td><td>Week 1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Forward Path</strong>: Coalition proceeds to Spring Budget (May), election campaign on "relief + green transition" platform. Confidence: 🟩HIGH.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18">B2: L Party Fracture (Probability: 18%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18">B2: L Party Fracture (Probability: 18%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: L Riksdag caucus splits on FiU48 — 3+ L MPs abstain or vote No, forcing minority passage.</p>
 <p><strong>Assumptions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18">B2: L Party Fracture (Probability
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Response</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L party leadership</td><td>Damage control, reassert coalition loyalty</td><td>Immediate</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Amplify L "disloyalty" to consolidate SD-center coalition narrative</td><td>3 days</td></tr><tr><td>S opposition</td><td>Claim "government in chaos"</td><td>Week 1</td></tr><tr><td>Media</td><td>Focus on coalition arithmetic and stability</td><td>2 weeks</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Forward Path</strong>: Ulf Kristersson calls emergency coalition summit. Fuel cut passes with smaller margin. Coalition credibility dented entering election. Confidence: 🟧MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17">B3: EU-Forced Policy Recalibration (Probability: 17%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17">B3: EU-Forced Policy Recalibration (Probability: 17%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: European Commission issues formal challenge to FiU48 (Energy Tax Directive violation) within 14 days; Sweden forced to modify or delay implementation.</p>
 <p><strong>Assumptions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1466,18 +1466,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17">B3: EU-Forced Polic
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Forward Path</strong>: Government issues "EU compatibility review" statement. Fuel cut delayed 30-60 days pending legal review. SD uses delay to attack government on EU "capitulation." Confidence: 🟧MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wild-card-scenarios">Wild Card Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3">W1: Early Election Triggered (Probability: 3%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wild-card-scenarios">Wild Card Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3">W1: Early Election Triggered (Probability: 3%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: FiU48 chamber vote fails due to surprise SD-L-M internal split; Kristersson announces confidence vote; early election (before September).</p>
 <p><strong>Why Unlikely</strong>: SD is strongly pro-fuel-cut; alliance math is solid at 175+. Would require unprecedented 4-party internal collapse.</p>
 <p><strong>ACH Red Flags</strong>: Any SD opposition statement on FiU48 or any L leadership emergency meeting = escalate probability to 12%.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2">W2: EU Emergency Injunction (Probability: 2%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2">W2: EU Emergency Injunction (Probability: 2%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: European Commission takes emergency action within 48 hours of FiU48 chamber vote to block implementation; first such action against a member state's supplementary budget.</p>
 <p><strong>Why Unlikely</strong>: Commission traditionally takes 2-4 weeks for formal challenges; an emergency injunction would set unprecedented precedent.</p>
 <p><strong>ACH Red Flags</strong>: Any Commission spokesperson statement on Swedish fuel taxes; any Belgian/German "level playing field" communiqué.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h3>
 <p>For the central question: <strong>"Will FiU48 pass the chamber vote without major incident?"</strong></p>
 
 
@@ -1517,14 +1517,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Analysis of Competing Hypothese
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Consistent Evidence</th><th>Inconsistent Evidence</th><th>Diagnostic</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1: Passes unanimously</td><td>L participation (Britz), alliance math (175+), no L statements against</td><td>L's EU-alignment, fossil fuel optics</td><td>MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>H2: Passes with L abstentions</td><td>L liberal wing, EU ETD minimum risk</td><td>No public L dissent statements today</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>H3: EU challenge issued same week</td><td>Nina Larsson delay precedent, ETD minimum risk</td><td>Commission typically 4-6 weeks for formal action</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>H4: Fails chamber vote</td><td>Zero consistent evidence</td><td>All alliance parties publicly support</td><td>NONE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Most Likely Scenario: H1</strong> (B1 Smooth Passage, 65% probability). Update this ACH if any L MP issues public statement against FiU48 before 2026-04-22 vote.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard">Scenario Monitoring Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard">Scenario Monitoring Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Scenario Probability Distribution (2026-04-21)"
     x-axis ["B1 Smooth Passage", "B2 L Fracture", "B3 EU Challenge", "W1 Early Election", "W2 EU Block"]
     y-axis "Probability (%)" 0 --> 70
     bar [65, 18, 17, 3, 2]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election">Strategic Implications for 2026 Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election">Strategic Implications for 2026 Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1553,13 +1553,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election">Strategic Implications for
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Election Outcome Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>B1 (65%)</td><td>Coalition gains 2-4% approval; "competent economic management" narrative sticks</td></tr><tr><td>B2 (18%)</td><td>L loses 1-2 seats; S gains urban center-left seats; coalition retains majority barely</td></tr><tr><td>B3 (17%)</td><td>EU compliance becomes ballot-box issue; C and L benefit as "pro-EU" parties</td></tr><tr><td>W1 (3%)</td><td>Hung parliament; S-led minority government most likely outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>RSK-ID</strong>: RSK-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Swedish Politics 2026-04-21
     x-axis "Low Likelihood" --> "High Likelihood"
@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     "R07 Energy Price Collapse": [0.20, 0.72]
     "R08 Climate Credibility Gap": [0.75, 0.70]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-risk-register">Detailed Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-risk-register">Detailed Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-detailed-risk-register">Detailed Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk Title</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Owner</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R01</strong></td><td>EU Commission queries Sweden's fuel tax cut under fossil subsidy monitoring</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td>5 (CRITICAL)</td><td><strong>15</strong></td><td>Svantesson/Government</td><td>2-4 weeks</td><td>Pre-draft EU response noting economic emergency justification</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R02</strong></td><td>L party abstention or defection on FiU48 fuel tax clause</td><td>2 (LOW-MEDIUM)</td><td>5 (CRITICAL)</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>L party leadership</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td><td>L already announced support; Britz + vindkraft law as counterweight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R03</strong></td><td>KU G16 produces formal observation on Svantesson fiscal governance</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson</td><td>2026-05-05 est.</td><td>Transparent documentation preparation for KU submission</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R04</strong></td><td>Government's "chaos coalition" framing succeeds against 4-party coordination</td><td>2 (LOW)</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>Opposition (S/V/MP/C)</td><td>Campaign 2026</td><td>Opposition maintains strategic messaging discipline (not shared press conference)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R05</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive infringement (non-transposition by June 7)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>Nina Larsson (L)</td><td>47 days</td><td>Fast-track transposition legislation; may require extraordinary committee session</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R06</strong></td><td>Gaza flotilla incident involving Swedish citizens</td><td>2 (LOW)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Malmer Stenergard</td><td>0-30 days</td><td>Diplomatic monitoring; consular preparedness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R07</strong></td><td>Energy prices fall sharply before FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>2 (LOW)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>External/market</td><td>0-3 days</td><td>Unlikely given market fundamentals; monitor Nordpool prices</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R08</strong></td><td>Climate credibility gap becomes dominant campaign narrative</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Coalition collective</td><td>Campaign 2026</td><td>Vindkraft law + three-step green package as counternarrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis">Coalition Stability Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis">Coalition Stability Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef critical fill:#C62828,color:#fff
     classDef high fill:#E65100,color:#fff
@@ -1694,7 +1694,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis">Coalition Stability Risk Analysis<
     EU_RISK -->|"June 7 trigger"| INFRINGEMENT["EU Infringement&#x3C;br/>Proceedings"]:::critical
     KU_RISK -->|"May report"| OBSERVATION["Formal KU Observation&#x3C;br/>on Svantesson"]:::medium</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis">Risk Trends from Previous Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis">Risk Trends from Previous Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1732,7 +1732,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis">Risk Trends from Previous Analysi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Yesterday (2026-04-20)</th><th>Today (2026-04-21)</th><th>Change</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R05 EU Pay Directive</td><td>HIGH (48 days)</td><td>HIGH (47 days)</td><td>⚠️ Countdown continues</td></tr><tr><td>R01 EU Commission</td><td>NOT TRACKED</td><td>HIGH (new)</td><td>🔴 New risk (FiU48 triggered)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional scrutiny</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM (KU hearings today)</td><td>↑ Elevated</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition coordination</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (21 motions confirmed)</td><td>↑ Elevated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-risk-assessment">Summary Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-risk-assessment">Summary Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Top 3 Risks requiring immediate monitoring:</strong></p>
 <ol>
 <li>
@@ -1747,13 +1747,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-risk-assessment">Summary Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidd
 </ol>
 <p><em>Confidence: 🟩HIGH | Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SWOT-ID</strong>: SWT-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Sweden 2026-04-21&#x3C;br/>Political SWOT))
     STRENGTHS
@@ -1787,8 +1787,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
       Gaza flotilla incident escalation
       Energy price collapse undermines FiU48 justification</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-full-swot-matrix">Full SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">Strengths (Coalition: Tidöalliansen M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-full-swot-matrix">Full SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">Strengths (Coalition: Tidöalliansen M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">Strengths (Coalition: Tid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU48 delivers immediate household relief</strong></td><td>4.1B SEK extra budget: fuel tax cut (82 öre/l petrol, 319 SEK/m³ diesel) + el-/gasprisstöd. ~6M vehicle owners and ~3M households benefit</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Majority intact</strong></td><td>175/349 Riksdag seats (M+SD+KD+L). No defections reported for FiU48</td><td>RT-1353 synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vindkraft law = green credibility</strong></td><td>Step 2 of three-step vindkraftspaket: resident revenue sharing up to 9 turbine-heights. Strategy to convert NIMBY to YIMBY</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional accountability operational</strong></td><td>KU G16 (Svantesson) + G34 (Wallström) hearings proceed — demonstrates functioning parliamentary oversight</td><td>HDC220260421ou1/ou2</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TU16 simplification</strong></td><td>Removal of mandatory introduction course for B-license practice driving — regulatory simplification message</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen">Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalliansen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen">Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalliansen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen">Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalli
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Climate law conflict</strong></td><td>FiU48 fuel tax cut adds +0.3-0.5 MtCO₂e/year. Under Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5, government must explain incompatibility. Sweden already ~20% behind 2030 target</td><td>HD01FiU48; MP motion HD024098</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU fossil minimum floor</strong></td><td>Sweden's fuel tax cut reduces to EU Energy Tax Directive minimum — weakens negotiating position on future EU climate measures</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson infrastructure accumulation</strong></td><td>9 interpellations against KD Infrastructure Minister covering rail closures, road safety, housing, airports, defense. Creates "minister in crisis" meta-narrative</td><td>HD10434 and prior IPs</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L party climate tension</strong></td><td>Liberals historically support green taxation; supporting fossil subsidy is ideological compromise. Risk of "only for the election" framing</td><td>RT-1353 scenario B</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc">Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc">Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc">Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>21-motion coordinated offensive</strong></td><td>All four major opposition parties filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 within 72 hours — historically rare multi-party coordination</td><td>HD024076-HD024089</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU legal deadline weaponization</strong></td><td>June 7, 2026 = deadline for EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition. Sofia Amloh (S) filed HD10437 directly citing deadline — external legal pressure reinforces parliamentary attack</td><td>HD10437 (from interpellations analysis)</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Women's welfare dual attack</strong></td><td>Two interpellations against Nina Larsson (L) filed same day: EU Pay Directive + women's shelter closures. "Minister failing women on two fronts" narrative</td><td>HD10437, HD10438</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Systematic accountability documentation</strong></td><td>S filed 11 of 14 most recent interpellations — building a timestamped record of government failures to mobilize in campaign</td><td>Interpellations synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc">Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc">Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc">Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S silent on FiU48 opposition</strong></td><td>Social Democrats cannot credibly oppose fuel tax relief when households face real energy costs. Economic reality creates affordability vs. climate dilemma</td><td>RT-1353; motions synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S silent on deportation</strong></td><td>Despite filing motions on reception and housing immigration laws, S avoided HD024090/95/97 deportation cluster — revealed strategic weakness on enforcement narrative</td><td>Motions synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>"Chaos coalition" risk</strong></td><td>When four opposition parties coordinate too visibly, M+SD frame it as "opposition chaos" — hurts opposition messaging</td><td>Motions synthesis</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1967,7 +1967,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU48 + vindkraft dual narrative</strong></td><td>Government can claim both affordability AND green transition before election. Rare political win-win</td><td>2026-04-22 to election</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU constrains opposition on Wallström</strong></td><td>G34 hearing of Wallström forces S to defend prior government decisions on foreign policy</td><td>2026-05 est.</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SiS reform institutional care</strong></td><td>Government commitment to improving conditions for children in institutional care shows social welfare responsiveness</td><td>2026-04-20 (press release)</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2010,7 +2010,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Probability</th><th>Severity</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU Commission fossil subsidy challenge</strong></td><td>EU Commission may formally query Sweden's fuel tax reduction under fossil subsidy monitoring framework</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson EU infringement (June 7)</strong></td><td>Non-transposition of EU Pay Transparency Directive = formal infringement proceedings. Electoral damage for equality-focused L party</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>4-party immigration coordination signal</strong></td><td>Opposition has demonstrated coordination capacity. Government must respond to 21 motions — response strategy risks</td><td>CONFIRMED</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gaza flotilla escalation</strong></td><td>Denis Begic question HD11731 — if Swedish citizens in Gaza convoy are harmed, government faces foreign policy emergency</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot">Coalition vs Opposition SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot">Coalition vs Opposition SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Coalition vs Opposition Strength Assessment 2026-04-21
     x-axis "Weak" --> "Strong"
@@ -2029,13 +2029,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot">Coalition vs Opposition SWOT<a class=""
     "KU Constitutional Hearings": [0.65, 0.75]</pre>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor AI Evening Analysis — Confidence: 🟩HIGH</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>THR-ID</strong>: THR-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef crit fill:#C62828,color:#fff,stroke:#900
     classDef high fill:#E65100,color:#fff,stroke:#C00
@@ -2071,8 +2071,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidd
     T6 --> T6A["Stockholm police density&#x3C;br/>declining despite 10k target&#x3C;br/>(BRÅ March 2026)&#x3C;br/>Severity: 4/5 CRITICAL"]:::high
     T6 --> T6B["Judicial self-scrutiny&#x3C;br/>weakness (Widding HD10441)&#x3C;br/>Severity: 3/5 HIGH"]:::med</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-category-details">Threat Category Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-details"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-1-institutional-threats">Category 1: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-category-details">Threat Category Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-details"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-1-institutional-threats">Category 1: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2100,7 +2100,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-1-institutional-threats">Category 1: Institutional Threats<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU G16 formal observation on Svantesson</td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td><td>4</td><td>KU G16 open hearing 2026-04-21</td><td>2026-05-05</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional norm erosion via executive overreach</td><td>Government</td><td>3</td><td>Background pattern across 2025/26</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-2-legislative-threats">Category 2: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-legislative-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-2-legislative-threats">Category 2: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-legislative-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-2-legislative-threats">Category 2: Legislative Threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 without climate compatibility assessment</td><td>Government</td><td>4</td><td>Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5 obligation</td><td>2026-04-22-24 vote</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 ECHR incompatibility</td><td>Government</td><td>4</td><td>Inhibition replacing temporary permits</td><td>2026-06-01</td></tr><tr><td>21 opposition motions unaddressed</td><td>Opposition</td><td>3</td><td>HD024076-HD024089 etc.</td><td>Committee cycles</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-3-externaleu-threats">Category 3: External/EU Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-externaleu-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-3-externaleu-threats">Category 3: External/EU Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-externaleu-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2170,7 +2170,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-3-externaleu-threats">Category 3: External/EU Threats<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU Pay Transparency infringement</strong></td><td>EU Commission</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>June 7, 2026 transposition deadline</td><td>47 days</td></tr><tr><td>EU fossil subsidy monitoring FiU48</td><td>EU Commission</td><td>4</td><td>EU Energy Tax Directive minimum breach</td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Gaza flotilla diplomatic incident</td><td>Israel/International</td><td>3</td><td>HD11731 question to Malmer Stenergard</td><td>Immediate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-4-electoral-threats">Category 4: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-electoral-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-4-electoral-threats">Category 4: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-electoral-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-4-electoral-threats">Category 4: Electoral Threats<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Opposition 4-party immigration coordination</td><td>S/V/MP/C bloc</td><td>4</td><td>21 motions including 4-party reception law cluster</td><td>Campaign 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S affordability credibility trap</td><td>Social Democrats</td><td>3</td><td>Cannot oppose FiU48 without appearing anti-household</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-5-fiscal-threats">Category 5: Fiscal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-fiscal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-5-fiscal-threats">Category 5: Fiscal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-fiscal-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-5-fiscal-threats">Category 5: Fiscal Threats<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 structural deficit impact</td><td>Government</td><td>3</td><td>4.1B SEK in 2026; structural budget impact</td><td>2026 fiscal year</td></tr><tr><td>Rural service closures (Skatteverket Vetlanda)</td><td>Government</td><td>2</td><td>HD11732 question</td><td>Immediate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-6-security-threats">Category 6: Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-security-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-6-security-threats">Category 6: Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-security-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2255,20 +2255,20 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-6-security-threats">Category 6: Security Threats<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Stockholm police density decline</strong></td><td>Government</td><td>4</td><td>BRÅ March 2026: only region with declining density despite 10k target</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial self-review system weakness</td><td>Rättsväsendet</td><td>3</td><td>HD10441: Widding → Strömmer on jurist-only review process</td><td>Structural</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level-assessment">Overall Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-level-assessment">Overall Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence Near HIGH</strong> | Overall Threat Level: <strong>HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The combination of a pending EU infringement deadline (47 days), climate law obligations triggered by FiU48, constitutional hearings on Finance Minister Svantesson, and a historically coordinated 4-party opposition offensive creates the highest threat concentration of the 2025/26 parliamentary session. The government's response to FiU48 must carefully balance immediate affordability narrative with medium-term climate and EU legal obligations.</p>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CMP-ID</strong>: CMP-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (policy design) | 🟧MEDIUM (electoral outcome predictions)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's Swedish parliamentary activity — a pre-election fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48), renewable energy revenue-sharing law, and EU Pay Directive compliance deadline — has direct parallels in at least five EU member states. This comparative analysis benchmarks each policy against international experience.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison">1. Pre-Election Fuel Tax Cuts: Cross-EU Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison">1. Pre-Election Fuel Tax Cuts: Cross-EU Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's HD01FiU48 reduces petrol excise by 82 öre/litre through September 2026 (election day) at a cost of ~4.1B SEK. How does this compare to peer nations?</p>
 
 
@@ -2335,7 +2335,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison">1. Pre-Election Fue
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: France is the best comparator — Macron's "remise à la pompe" was timed to the 2022 presidential election campaign. EC raised informal concerns but did not issue formal challenge. Short-term approval boost was +4%, but effect dissipated after expiry.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific risk</strong>: Sweden is closer to the EU Energy Tax Directive minimum rate than Germany or Netherlands were — making an EC formal challenge more likely than in the German case.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks">2. Wind Energy Revenue Sharing: International Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks">2. Wind Energy Revenue Sharing: International Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks"></a></h3>
 <p>The new Swedish law (announced by Johan Britz 2026-04-21) requires turbine operators to share revenues with residents within 9 turbine-heights radius.</p>
 
 
@@ -2394,7 +2394,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks">2. Wind Energ
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Policy</th><th>Revenue Share %</th><th>Geographic Scope</th><th>NIMBY→YIMBY Conversion</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden 2026</strong></td><td>Residents within 9 turbine-heights</td><td>~3-5% (TBC)</td><td>National</td><td>Expected — modeled on SE-Norway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Grunnrentebeskatning (2023)</td><td>40% above NOK 0.254/kWh (municipal share)</td><td>National</td><td>✅ Significant — local acceptance up 28% (COWI 2024)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Shared ownership law (2009, updated 2023)</td><td>20% local residents offer</td><td>National</td><td>✅ Strong — DK has 5,700+ turbines, lowest NIMBY rate in EU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>§36g EEG (2021 amendment)</td><td>0.2¢/kWh to municipalities</td><td>National</td><td>🟡 Moderate — municipal income yes, resident income no</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Community benefit funds (voluntary, 2014)</td><td>~0.5% revenue</td><td>England/Wales</td><td>🟡 Moderate — Scotland stronger (Community Ownership Fund)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Lokaal eigendom (2023 target: 50% local)</td><td>Up to 50% ownership stake</td><td>National</td><td>✅ Strong where implemented</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden is adopting a model closest to Norway's (revenue-based, geographically bounded) rather than Denmark's (shared ownership). Norway's model increased local acceptance by 28%. Sweden can expect a 15-25% acceptance increase in turbine-siting areas over 3-5 years — but the law does not yet resolve grid connection disputes (see HD11730).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison">3. Constitutional Review of Finance Ministers: Nordic Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison">3. Constitutional Review of Finance Ministers: Nordic Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison"></a></h3>
 <p>KU G16 hearing on Elisabeth Svantesson (M) on fiscal governance:</p>
 
 
@@ -2439,7 +2439,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison">3. Co
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Frequency</th><th>Consequences</th><th>Recent Notable Case</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Konstitutionsutskott (KU) annual granskning</td><td>Annual (public hearings)</td><td>Observation (anmärkning), reputational</td><td>Svantesson G16 2026; Wallström G34 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Censure possible</td><td>Jonas Gahr Støre (AP) on Acer/ACER energy (2022)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Folketing's Finansudvalget</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Rare formal censure</td><td>Treasury Minister (2021 Covid support payments)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Perustuslakivaliokunta</td><td>Constitutional review of bills</td><td>Veto power on legislation</td><td>Orpo government (2023) initial social security cuts modified</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden's KU granskning is uniquely powerful — a public hearing with named ministers who must attend in person. Svantesson is simultaneously architect of FiU48 AND under constitutional scrutiny today. This dual exposure (fiscal stimulus + constitutional accountability) creates highest-visibility day for any Swedish Finance Minister in at least 5 years.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map">4. EU Pay Transparency Directive: Member State Compliance Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map">4. EU Pay Transparency Directive: Member State Compliance Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden (Nina Larsson, L, 47 days remaining):</p>
 
 
@@ -2503,7 +2503,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map">4. EU Pa
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Implementation Status</th><th>Gap Risk</th><th>Approach</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Draft legislation pending</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Single omnibus bill (late)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Entgelttransparenzgesetz updated Jan 2026</td><td>🟢 LOW</td><td>Existing law extended</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Ligelønslov modified Mar 2026</td><td>🟢 LOW</td><td>Administrative update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Tasa-arvolaki proposal Feb 2026</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>Still in committee</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Wet gelijke beloning submitted Apr 2026</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>On track</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Index égalité professionelle extended</td><td>🟢 LOW</td><td>Existing index system</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Poland</strong></td><td>No bill introduced</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Infringement risk parallel to Sweden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Hungary</strong></td><td>No bill introduced</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Infringement risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden is in the second-slowest tier (with Poland and Hungary in the bottom tier). The Commission is expected to issue formal letters to the 5-7 non-compliant states on June 8, the day after the deadline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis">5. Opposition Coordination Waves: Comparative Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis">5. Opposition Coordination Waves: Comparative Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's 21 coordinated S/V/MP/C counter-motions (2026-04-21) on immigration and fiscal policy:</p>
 
 
@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis">5. Opposition C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country/Context</th><th>Coordination Size</th><th>Issue Focus</th><th>Effectiveness</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden 2026</strong></td><td>4 parties, 21 motions, 1 day</td><td>Immigration + fiscal</td><td>TBD — election 145 days away</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden 2022</strong></td><td>3 parties (S-led), 14 motions</td><td>Energy price relief</td><td>High — forced government fuel rebate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany 2023</strong></td><td>SPD+Grüne+FDP (coalition)</td><td>Budget crisis</td><td>Medium — constitutional court ruling intervened</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark 2024</strong></td><td>Socialdemokratiet+SF+EL</td><td>Green transition</td><td>High — influenced Social Housing law</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK 2023</strong></td><td>Labour+SNP+Lib Dem</td><td>Cost of living</td><td>Low — Conservative majority overrode</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden's opposition coordination is historically effective when focused on economic policy (2022 analogy). The 2026 wave is broader (immigration + fiscal) and happens with 145 days to election — giving media and voters time to process before the ballot.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026">Summary: Sweden's Position in EU Policy Space (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026">Summary: Sweden's Position in EU Policy Space (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title EU Policy Benchmarks vs Sweden 2026
     x-axis "Low Policy Ambition" --> "High Policy Ambition"
@@ -2565,12 +2565,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026">Summary: Swed
     Immigration Counter-Motions: [0.60, 0.20]</pre>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CLS-ID</strong>: CLS-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Classification Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef pub fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff
     classDef int fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
@@ -2598,7 +2598,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-
     DOC_LIST --> FRA731["HD11731: PUBLIC&#x3C;br/>Written question — diplomatic"]:::pub
     DOC_LIST --> FRA732["HD11732: PUBLIC&#x3C;br/>Written question"]:::pub</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2702,7 +2702,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Fiscal/Energy</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>10/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU16</strong></td><td>Slopat krav introduktionsutbildning</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Transport/Regulatory</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>4/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10440</strong></td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Labour/Health</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10441</strong></td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Justice/Constitutional</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10442</strong></td><td>Ätstörningsvård Region Stockholm</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Healthcare/Welfare</td><td>🟠 ELEVATED</td><td>7/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11730</strong></td><td>Utbetalningar till vindkraftskommuner</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Energy/Finance</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>5/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11731</strong></td><td>Gaza flotilla — Swedish citizens</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Foreign Policy</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL (potential)</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11732</strong></td><td>Skatteverket Vetlanda closure</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Public Services</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>4/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gov/vindkraft</strong></td><td>Vindkraft revenue sharing</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Energy Policy</td><td>🟠 ELEVATED</td><td>8/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU G16</strong></td><td>Svantesson hearing</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>8/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU G34</strong></td><td>Wallström hearing</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>7/10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2745,7 +2745,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Documents</th><th>Combined Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD11732</td><td><strong>CRITICAL</strong> (10/10 lead)</td></tr><tr><td>Energy/Climate</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD11730, gov/vindkraft</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> (9/10 cluster)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional/Legal</td><td>HD10441, KU G16, KU G34</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> (8/10)</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare/Welfare</td><td>HD10440, HD10442</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> (7/10)</td></tr><tr><td>Transport</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td><strong>LOW</strong> (4/10)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Policy</td><td>HD11731</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> (6/10)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision-1">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision-1">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2772,12 +2772,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-publication-decision-1">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Article</th><th>Status</th><th>Classification</th><th>Labels</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html</td><td>✅ PUBLISH</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>automated-news, evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html</td><td>✅ PUBLISH</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>automated-news, evening-analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis — Classification: PUBLIC</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>XRF-ID</strong>: XRF-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef prop fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     classDef bet fill:#C62828,color:#fff
@@ -2810,7 +2810,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" a
     IP442 -->|"Targets"| KU16
     SFU22 -->|"Opposition cluster"| MOT_FUEL</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2878,7 +2878,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Primary dok_id</th><th>Linked dok_id(s)</th><th>Relationship Type</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:236</td><td>Bet. approves prop.</td><td>Direct</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>HD024082, HD024098</td><td>Opposition counter-motions</td><td>Adversarial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>KU G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>Finance Minister under dual scrutiny</td><td>Parallel</td></tr><tr><td><strong>gov/vindkraft</strong></td><td>HD11730 (Lakso → Busch)</td><td>Question about wind power municipal payments</td><td>Background</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10440</strong></td><td>HD10441, HD10442</td><td>Three interpellations filed same day</td><td>Coordinated</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10442</strong></td><td>KU G16</td><td>Svantesson targeted from multiple directions</td><td>Convergent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</td><td>Opposition counter-motions to migration reform</td><td>Adversarial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11731</strong> (Gaza)</td><td>Prior Bernadotte interpellation (HD10435)</td><td>Foreign policy accountability chain</td><td>Sequential</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU16</strong></td><td>Previous driver training framework</td><td>Regulatory simplification sequence</td><td>Policy evolution</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Last 3 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Last 3 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2921,7 +2921,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days">Upstream Watchpoint R
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Source</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government response to Bernadotte interpellation (deadline 2026-04-30)</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>⚠️ PENDING — HD11731 new question adds pressure</td></tr><tr><td>Media framing of Spring Economic Bill HD03100 vs Nordic GDP gap</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>🔄 ACTIVE — FiU48 now framing economic relief</td></tr><tr><td>SD positioning on 21 coordinated immigration counter-motions</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>🔄 ACTIVE — SD supporting fuel cut, not engaging immigration motions</td></tr><tr><td>KU33/KU32 second reading fate post-September election</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>⚠️ PENDING — KU hearings today add context</td></tr><tr><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive infringement proceedings</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>🔴 ESCALATING — 47 days remain</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm police density declining (BRÅ March 2026)</td><td>RT-1353 (2026-04-21)</td><td>🔄 ACTIVE — HD10439 filed as interpellation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence">Government Activity — Cross-Ministry Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence">Government Activity — Cross-Ministry Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2955,12 +2955,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence">Government Activity 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Ministry</th><th>Activity Type</th><th>Coherence Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>FiU48 lead + KU hearing + HD10442 + HD11732</td><td>CONTRADICTORY — fiscal relief vs. fiscal responsibility + healthcare scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td>Climate/Labour (Britz)</td><td>Vindkraft law + HD10440 (occupational physicians)</td><td>COMPLEMENTARY — green transition + labour training</td></tr><tr><td>Justice (Strömmer)</td><td>HD10441 (rättssäkerhet) + SiS visit</td><td>PARALLEL — different dimensions of justice</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Affairs (Malmer Stenergard)</td><td>HD11731 (Gaza) + KU G34 (Wallström scrutiny)</td><td>PARALLEL — current crisis + historical scrutiny</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>MTH-ID</strong>: MTH-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-quality-assessment">Analysis Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-quality-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50">Methodology Version: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-quality-assessment">Analysis Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-quality-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50">Methodology Version: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50">Methodology Versi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Phase</th><th>Target Duration</th><th>Actual Duration</th><th>Quality Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Setup + MCP health</td><td>0–3 min</td><td>~3 min</td><td>✅ On target</td></tr><tr><td>Data download</td><td>3–6 min</td><td>~5 min (populate-analysis-data timeout, fallback to download-parliamentary-data)</td><td>✅ Adapted successfully</td></tr><tr><td>AI Analysis Pass 1</td><td>6–21 min</td><td>~14 min (7 core artifacts)</td><td>🟡 Compressed by context compaction</td></tr><tr><td>AI Analysis Pass 2</td><td>21–28 min</td><td>~22 min (7 additional artifacts)</td><td>✅ Full second pass</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-analysis-depth-deep">Analysis Depth: <code>deep</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-depth-deep"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysis-depth-deep">Analysis Depth: <code>deep</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-depth-deep"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3059,7 +3059,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analysis-depth-deep">Analysis Depth: <code>deep</code><a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Requirement</th><th>Target</th><th>Actual</th><th>Met?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AI iterations</td><td>2–3</td><td>2</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT stakeholders</td><td>≥7 groups</td><td>8 groups</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Charts/diagrams</td><td>≥2</td><td>9 Mermaid diagrams across artifacts</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Mindmap</td><td>Required</td><td>✅ In swot-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Color-coded Mermaid</td><td>≥2</td><td>4 (synthesis, swot, threat, cross-reference)</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Risk matrix (L×I)</td><td>≥4 risks</td><td>8 risks with scores</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Forward indicators</td><td>≥3</td><td>7 (synthesis-summary.md table)</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labels</td><td>All claims</td><td>Applied (🟦/🟩/🟧/🟥)</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-tool-performance">MCP Tool Performance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-tool-performance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-tool-performance">MCP Tool Performance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-tool-performance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3112,7 +3112,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-tool-performance">MCP Tool Performance<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tool</th><th>Status</th><th>Fallback Used</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>get_sync_status</code></td><td>✅ Live (status:live 18:20 UTC)</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_anforanden</code></td><td>✅ 50 results returned</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_dokument</code></td><td>✅ 8 documents 2026-04-21</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_regering</code></td><td>✅ 10 press releases</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_voteringar</code></td><td>✅ (returns AU10 from 2026-03-04 — no 2026-04-21 votes yet)</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>get_calendar_events</code></td><td>❌ Returns HTML (known issue)</td><td>Used search_dokument bet. proxy</td></tr><tr><td><code>populate-analysis-data.ts</code></td><td>❌ Timeout (>3 min)</td><td>Used download-parliamentary-data.ts (8s)</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank <code>get_economic_data</code></td><td>✅ GDP, Inflation, Unemployment</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (from 2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (from 2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3155,7 +3155,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20">Upstream Watchpoi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint from 2026-04-20</th><th>Today's Update</th><th>Resolved?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 extra ändringsbudget fate</td><td>Finance Committee approved; chamber vote 2026-04-22/23</td><td>✅ RESOLVED (tracked)</td></tr><tr><td>EU Pay Directive Nina Larsson</td><td>47 days to June 7 confirmed — escalating</td><td>✅ TRACKED → risk R05</td></tr><tr><td>SD immigration positioning</td><td>SD supporting FiU48; not engaging immigration counter-motions</td><td>🔄 ONGOING</td></tr><tr><td>Bernadotte interpellation HD10435 government response deadline</td><td>2026-04-30 deadline still active</td><td>⚠️ STILL PENDING</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm police density</td><td>BRÅ data confirmed — HD10439 filed</td><td>✅ TRACKED → cross-reference</td></tr><tr><td>KU constitutional hearings</td><td>G16 (Svantesson) + G34 (Wallström) completed today</td><td>✅ NEW DEVELOPMENT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22">New Watchpoints Created for 2026-04-22+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22">New Watchpoints Created for 2026-04-22+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3198,8 +3198,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22">New Watchpoints Created for 2
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Priority</th><th>Trigger Condition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote result + L party bloc</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>Any L abstentions = coalition fracture signal</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission fuel tax informal statement</td><td>🟠 HIGH</td><td>Commission spokesperson press briefing</td></tr><tr><td>Nina Larsson EU Pay Directive legislative update</td><td>🟠 HIGH</td><td>Bill submitted to riksdag or announced</td></tr><tr><td>Bernadotte interpellation response (deadline 2026-04-30)</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>Response filed</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law committee referral</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>Which committee receives referral</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish police officer density correction</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>BRÅ follow-up or ministry response</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage-decisions">Coverage Decisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-decisions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources">Documents Analyzed (from 2026-04-21 sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-decisions">Coverage Decisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-decisions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources">Documents Analyzed (from 2026-04-21 sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3266,7 +3266,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources">Documents Analyzed (from
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Analysis Depth</th><th>Included in Articles</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>✅ DEEP — primary analysis</td><td>✅ EN + SV lead</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — mentioned</td><td>✅ Secondary mention</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>✅ DEEP — interpellation wave analysis</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>✅ DEEP — interpellation wave analysis</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>✅ DEEP — interpellation wave analysis</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD11730</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — cross-reference</td><td>✅ Mentioned</td></tr><tr><td>HD11731</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — Gaza foreign policy</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD11732</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — Vetlanda/Skatteverket</td><td>✅ Mentioned</td></tr><tr><td>gov/vindkraft (Britz)</td><td>✅ DEEP — new law</td><td>✅ EN + SV section</td></tr><tr><td>KU G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>✅ DEEP</td><td>✅ EN + SV section</td></tr><tr><td>KU G34 (Wallström)</td><td>✅ DEEP</td><td>✅ EN + SV section</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination">Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination">Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3294,7 +3294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination">Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollinatio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Elements Borrowed</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>FiU48 timeline and vote projections</td></tr><tr><td><code>interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>Full interpellation wave context and 9 Carlson accumulation</td></tr><tr><td><code>motions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>4-party 21-motion coordination analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD10435 Gaza, police density, wind power context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-process-improvement-notes">Process Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-improvement-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-process-improvement-notes">Process Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-improvement-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong><code>get_calendar_events</code> workaround</strong>: Tool consistently returns HTML rather than calendar data. Reliable fallback: <code>search_dokument</code> with <code>doktyp: "bet"</code> + <code>organ: "KU"</code> for constitutional hearings.</li>
 <li><strong><code>populate-analysis-data.ts</code> timeout</strong>: Script times out when MCP server is slow. Use <code>download-parliamentary-data.ts</code> as first-choice — faster, targeted, reliable.</li>
@@ -3303,7 +3303,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-process-improvement-notes">Process Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-
 <li><strong>Economic data</strong>: World Bank SDK returns reliable data; IMF MCP not used this run (not needed given World Bank sufficiency).</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-quality-confidence-assessment">Quality Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-confidence-assessment">Quality Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Overall Analysis Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <ul>
 <li>14 artifacts created (9 core + 5 Tier-C)</li>
@@ -3317,7 +3317,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-quality-confidence-assessment">Quality Confidence Assessment<a class=
 </ul>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 18:24 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_propositioner, get_motioner, get_betankanden, search_voteringar, search_anforanden, get_fragor, get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 180
@@ -3331,7 +3331,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 30 documents</li>
@@ -3341,7 +3341,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21">Date-Filtered Documents for 2026-04-21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21">Date-Filtered Documents for 2026-04-21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3411,7 +3411,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21">Date-Filtered Documents for 2
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Typ</th><th>Organ</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>bet</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>10/10</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning</td><td>bet</td><td>TU</td><td>4/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>ip</td><td>-</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>ip</td><td>-</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Uttalanden om ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm</td><td>ip</td><td>-</td><td>7/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD11730</td><td>Utbetalningar till vindkraftskommuner</td><td>frå</td><td>-</td><td>5/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD11731</td><td>Sveriges agerande för att skydda sina medborgare i Gazaflottiljen</td><td>frå</td><td>-</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD11732</td><td>Planerad nedläggning av Skatteverkets kontor i Vetlanda</td><td>frå</td><td>-</td><td>4/10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references">Sibling Analysis Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references">Sibling Analysis Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3443,11 +3443,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references">Sibling Analysis Cross-References<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling Type</th><th>Documents</th><th>Key Finding</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>committeeReports</td><td>14 (HD01FiU48 + 13 others)</td><td>FiU48 10/10; SfU22 9/10; KU32/KU33 8/10</td></tr><tr><td>interpellations</td><td>14 (HD10437-HD10439 + prior)</td><td>S accountability offensive; EU Pay Directive 47-day deadline</td></tr><tr><td>motions</td><td>21 (opposition cluster 2026-04-13-17)</td><td>4-party coordinated immigration counter-motions</td></tr><tr><td>realtime-1353</td><td>7 (HD01FiU48 + KU hearings + IPs)</td><td>FiU48 + vindkraft law = coalition "affordability+green"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 World Bank data: GDP 0.82% (2024), Inflation 2.84% (2024), Unemployment 8.69% (2025)
 Calendar API: HTML response (fallback document search used)
 Data freshness: Live (synced 2026-04-21T18:20:23Z)</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3492,7 +3509,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:07.562Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:28.976Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html b/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html
index 39729f811f..45400692f1 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.694Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:29.113Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.694Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:29.113Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three","description":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three simultaneous high-stakes policy developments. Finance Committee FiU48 — an extraordinary 4.1 billion SEK supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:07.694Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10440.json","name":"documents/hd10440.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10441.json","name":"documents/hd10441.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10442.json","name":"documents/hd10442.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11730.json","name":"documents/hd11730.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11731.json","name":"documents/hd11731.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11732.json","name":"documents/hd11732.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three","description":"Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three simultaneous high-stakes policy developments. Finance Committee FiU48 — an extraordinary 4.1 billion SEK supplementary budget…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:29.113Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01fiu48.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu48.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd01tu16.json","name":"documents/hd01tu16.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10440.json","name":"documents/hd10440.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10441.json","name":"documents/hd10441.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd10442.json","name":"documents/hd10442.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11730.json","name":"documents/hd11730.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11731.json","name":"documents/hd11731.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/documents/hd11732.json","name":"documents/hd11732.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,21 +196,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Package</strong>: EVE-2026-04-21 | <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front — ≤300 words)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front--300-words"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliament entered a decisive pre-election week with three simultaneous high-stakes policy developments. Finance Committee FiU48 — an extraordinary 4.1 billion SEK supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes to the EU's legal minimum and providing direct energy price support — moved to chamber vote (expected 2026-04-22), delivering tangible household relief to approximately 9 million Swedes at a moment when GDP growth stands at only 0.82% and unemployment has risen to 8.69%. Simultaneously, the government launched a new law requiring wind turbine operators to share revenues with nearby residents — a policy designed to convert local opposition (NIMBY) to support (YIMBY) for Sweden's renewable energy expansion. These two moves together define the coalition's "affordability and green transition" pre-election narrative.</p>
 <p>The constitutional arena was equally active: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) faced a public KU open hearing (G16) on fiscal governance, while former Foreign Minister Margot Wallström (S) faced her own KU hearing (G34) on prior government foreign policy decisions — keeping both coalition and opposition under constitutional scrutiny. The opposition response was a coordinated accountability offensive: three new interpellations targeting Svantesson, Britz, and Strömmer were filed today, adding to a 21-motion policy blitz launched last week. The EU clock is also ticking: Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson has 47 days to transpose the EU Pay Transparency Directive or face infringement proceedings. <strong>145 days remain to the September 13, 2026 election.</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial decision</strong>: Publish FiU48 as lead story immediately in EN + SV — affects 9M citizens directly</li>
 <li><strong>Monitoring decision</strong>: Track FiU48 chamber vote (2026-04-22/23) and any L party dissent as coalition stability signal</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis decision</strong>: Flag EU Pay Directive breach (June 7 deadline) as escalating risk requiring dedicated tracking</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>FiU48 fuel tax cut</strong>: Finance Committee approved extra budget reducing petrol tax by 82 öre/l and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ through September 2026; chamber vote imminent</li>
 <li>⚡ <strong>Energy price support</strong>: 4.1B SEK total including household el- och gasprisstöd for ~3M households facing elevated energy costs</li>
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-
 <li>🌍 <strong>Gaza flotilla</strong>: Denis Begic (S) presses Foreign Minister Malmer Stenergard on protecting Swedish citizens joining international Gaza civilian convoy</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders">Named Actors (≥5 ministers/party leaders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders">Named Actors (≥5 ministers/party leaders)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors-5-ministersparty-leaders">Named Actors (≥5 ministers/p
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Significance Today</th><th>dok_id</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong></td><td>Finance Minister</td><td>FiU48 architect + KU G16 hearing + HD10442 + HD11732</td><td>HD01FiU48, KU G16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Britz (L)</strong></td><td>Acting Climate/Labour Minister</td><td>Vindkraft law announcement + HD10440 interpellation</td><td>gov/vindkraft, HD10440</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</strong></td><td>Justice Minister</td><td>HD10441 on rättssäkerhet; SiS visit</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson (L)</strong></td><td>Gender Equality Minister</td><td>EU Pay Directive 47-day deadline</td><td>(from interpellations analysis)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard (M)</strong></td><td>Foreign Minister</td><td>HD11731 Gaza flotilla accountability</td><td>HD11731</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Margot Wallström (S)</strong></td><td>Former Foreign Minister</td><td>KU G34 constitutional hearing</td><td>KU G34</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson (KD)</strong></td><td>Infrastructure Minister</td><td>9 accumulated interpellations</td><td>(from interpellations analysis)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Markus Kallifatides (S)</strong></td><td>MP, opposition</td><td>HD10442 filed today</td><td>HD10442</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johanna Haraldsson (S)</strong></td><td>MP, opposition</td><td>HD10440 + HD11732 same day</td><td>HD10440, HD11732</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22">Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22">Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-day-watch-points-2026-04-22">Next-Day Watch Points (2026-04-22)<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watch Point</th><th>What to Monitor</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>Vote count — L party bloc discipline</td><td>Coalition stability test</td></tr><tr><td>L party communications</td><td>Any public reservations on fuel tax</td><td>Internal fracture signal</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission statement</td><td>Any reaction to Sweden's fuel tax minimum</td><td>External pressure</td></tr><tr><td>Interpellation responses scheduled</td><td>Strömmer, Britz, Svantesson responses</td><td>Minister credibility metrics</td></tr><tr><td>New opposition filings</td><td>Any follow-up motions to 21-motion wave</td><td>Opposition escalation assessment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>EU Pay Transparency infringement proceedings</td><td>16</td><td>47 days</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>EU fossil subsidy challenge (FiU48)</td><td>15</td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>KU G16 formal observation on Svantesson</td><td>12</td><td>2026-05-05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Gaza flotilla incident — Swedish citizens</td><td>8</td><td>Immediate</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>L party abstention FiU48 → coalition fracture</td><td>10</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-meter">Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-meter">Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -409,17 +409,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-meter">Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 content and significance</td><td>🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law policy intent</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition coordination assessment</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>EU legal risk analysis</td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>KU hearing outcomes</td><td>🟧 MEDIUM (not yet concluded)</td></tr><tr><td>Chamber vote result</td><td>🟩 HIGH (predicted: passes 175+)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <img src="https://hack23.com/icon-192.png" alt="Hack23 Logo" width="96" height="96">
 </p>
-<h2 align="center" id="rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h2 align="center" id="rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis">📊 Intelligence Synthesis Dashboard — Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-synthesis-dashboard--evening-analysis"></a></h2>
 <p align="center">
   <strong>Fuel Tax Election Gamble · Constitutional Hearings · Opposition Accountability Offensive</strong><br>
   <em>Tuesday 2026-04-21 | Riksmöte 2025/26 | Deep Analysis</em>
 </p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--synthesis-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-metadata"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--synthesis-metadata">📋 Synthesis Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Synthesis ID</strong></td><td><code>SYN-2026-04-21-EVE001</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 18:30 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Documents Analyzed</strong></td><td>8 (direct) + 55 (via sibling analysis cross-reference)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Period</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 (plus integrated sibling analysis: CR, MOT, IP, RT-1353)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Produced By</strong></td><td>news-evening-analysis agentic workflow v5.0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Confidence</strong></td><td>HIGH 🟩</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Days to Election</strong></td><td>~145 days (September 13, 2026)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph "📊 Evening Analysis Intelligence Dashboard — 2026-04-21"
         direction TB
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--intelligence-dashboard">📊 Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-
     style KU fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#E65100,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Electoral Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>FiU48: 4.1B SEK extra budget</strong> — fuel tax cut (82 öre/l) + energy price support benefits ~9M citizens. Coalition election-year "affordability" move at EU fossil minimum</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td><strong>10/10</strong></td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>VERY HIGH</strong> — direct household relief before election</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>KU constitutional hearings</strong> — Svantesson (G16) + Wallström (G34) in annual granskning. Any critical observations could damage coalition's fiscal governance narrative</td><td>HDC220260421ou1/ou2</td><td>8/10</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — constitutional accountability</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>21-motion opposition coordination</strong> — S/V/MP/C filed counter-motions to government immigration bills within 72 hours. Unprecedented multi-party coordination signals opposition's 2026 campaign architecture</td><td>HD024076-HD024089</td><td>9/10</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>VERY HIGH</strong> — electoral campaign launched</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td><strong>Eating disorder care crisis</strong> (HD10442) — Kallifatides (S) presses Svantesson about Region Stockholm's failure to provide care. Cross-party concern about private welfare operator failures</td><td>HD10442</td><td>7/10</td><td>🟩HIGH</td><td><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> — welfare state credibility</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td><strong>Gaza flotilla accountability</strong> (HD11731) — Denis Begic (S) presses Maria Malmer Stenergard on protecting Swedish citizens participating in Gaza civilian convoy. Foreign policy human rights dimension</td><td>HD11731</td><td>6/10</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — foreign policy accountability</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-swot-summary">🗂️ SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-swot-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-summary">🗂️ SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-swot-summary">🗂️ SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Coalition (Tidöalliansen)</th><th>Opposition (S/V/MP/C)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Strengths)</strong></td><td>FiU48 delivers tangible relief; 175-seat majority intact; vindkraft adds green credibility</td><td>Coordinated messaging architecture; EU legal deadlines become attack vectors; 21-motion platform</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W (Weaknesses)</strong></td><td>FiU48 conflicts with climate law §5 (Klimatlagen); L internal tension possible; KU hearings expose fiscal process</td><td>S silent on deportation = credibility gap; M/SD attacks incoming on "chaos coalition" risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>O (Opportunities)</strong></td><td>FiU48 + vindkraft dual narrative pre-positions for September; SiS reform shows institutional care commitment</td><td>KU G16 findings could damage Svantesson; EU infringement on Pay Directive (47-day deadline) creates external pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>T (Threats)</strong></td><td>EU Commission fossil subsidy challenge; energy price collapse before vote undermines justification; +0.3-0.5 MtCO₂e climate regression</td><td>Opposition must avoid appearing obstructionist on affordability; "chaos coalition" framing if too coordinated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-landscape">📈 Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-landscape">📈 Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-landscape"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-landscape">📈 Risk Landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01</td><td>FiU48 undermines Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5 — EU Commission scrutiny</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>R02</td><td>L party dissent on fuel tax clause → coalition fracture</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>0-3 days</td></tr><tr><td>R03</td><td>KU G16 produces formal observation on Svantesson's fiscal process</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>R04</td><td>Opposition 21-motion coordination becomes S "chaos coalition" liability</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>3-6 months</td></tr><tr><td>R05</td><td>EU Pay Directive infringement deadline (47 days, June 7) creates crisis for Nina Larsson</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>47 days</td></tr><tr><td>R06</td><td>Gaza flotilla incident involving Swedish citizens → foreign policy emergency</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>0-30 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔮 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicators">🔮 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-indicators">🔮 Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU48 chamber vote result</strong></td><td>175+ YES from M+SD+KD+L</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td><td>Coalition stability test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L party voting on fuel tax</strong></td><td>Any L abstentions on FiU48</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td><td>Internal coalition fracture signal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission monitoring</strong></td><td>Formal letter to Swedish government</td><td>2-4 weeks</td><td>External climate pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU G16 draft report</strong></td><td>Svantesson fiscal governance observations</td><td>2026-05-05 est.</td><td>Constitutional accountability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson EU deadline</strong></td><td>Transposition or infringement</td><td>2026-06-07</td><td>EU law compliance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition interpellation responses</strong></td><td>Strömmer/Britz/Svantesson reply</td><td>2026-04-28 est.</td><td>Minister accountability metrics</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--artifacts-inventory">📦 Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--artifacts-inventory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-artifacts-inventory">📦 Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-artifacts-inventory"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--artifacts-inventory">📦 Artifacts Inventory<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Artifact</th><th>Status</th><th>Size (bytes)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>synthesis-summary.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~8,000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~5,000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>classification-results.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~3,500</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~3,000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~6,000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cross-reference-map.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>data-download-manifest.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~2,500</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>README.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~3,500</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>executive-brief.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~5,000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>comparative-international.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~5,000</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>methodology-reflection.md</td><td>✅ Complete</td><td>~4,000</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -831,12 +831,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-election-2026-implications">🗳️ Election 2026 Implications<a
 <hr>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor AI Evening Analysis — Classification: PUBLIC — See full artifacts inventory above</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SIG-ID</strong>: SIG-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Scoring Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix">5-Dimension Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix">5-Dimension Scoring Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "Significance Scoring — Evening Analysis 2026-04-21"
         A["🗳️ Electoral Impact&#x3C;br/>Score: 10/10&#x3C;br/>FiU48 = direct voter relief&#x3C;br/>Opposition 21-motion architecture"] 
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-scoring-matrix">5-Dimension Scoring Matrix<a class="" ari
     D -.->|"Weight 15%"| COMP
     E -.->|"Weight 10%"| COMP</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-significance-scores">Per-Document Significance Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-significance-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-significance-scores">Per-Document Significance Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-significance-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-significance-scores">Per-Document Significance Scores<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Electoral</th><th>Constitutional</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>International</th><th>Precedent</th><th><strong>Composite</strong></th><th>DIW Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>10</td><td>7</td><td>10</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.9</strong></td><td>0.30</td></tr><tr><td>Gov/vindkraft</td><td>9</td><td>5</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.2</strong></td><td>0.18</td></tr><tr><td>KU G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.9</strong></td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442 (ätstörning)</td><td>7</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.8</strong></td><td>0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Motions 21-cluster</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>9</td><td><strong>7.3</strong></td><td>0.14</td></tr><tr><td>HD11731 (Gaza)</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.1</strong></td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441 (rättssäkerhet)</td><td>6</td><td>8</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td><strong>5.5</strong></td><td>0.05</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td><strong>2.4</strong></td><td>0.03</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Day Composite Score: 8.7/10 (DIW-weighted)</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -983,13 +983,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-publication-decision">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>PUBLISH IMMEDIATELY</strong></td><td>8.7/10 composite score exceeds 6.0 publication threshold by wide margin</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority Level</strong></td><td>P1 — LEAD STORY: FiU48 extra budget</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Languages</strong></td><td>EN + SV (primary); translations via news-translate workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Coverage Depth</strong></td><td>Deep — 1,500-2,500 words with economic context and election implications</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>STA-ID</strong>: STA-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-impact-radar"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef citizens fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     classDef coalition fill:#C62828,color:#fff
@@ -1011,8 +1011,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-impact-radar">Impact Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     CENTER --> C7["7️⃣ JUDICIARY/CONST&#x3C;br/>Impact: HIGH&#x3C;br/>KU hearings today&#x3C;br/>Widding rättssäkerhet"]:::jud
     CENTER --> C8["8️⃣ MEDIA/PUBLIC OPINION&#x3C;br/>Impact: HIGH&#x3C;br/>Affordability narrative&#x3C;br/>Climate vs. relief frame"]:::media</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups">All 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-allmänheten">1. Citizens (Allmänheten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-allmänheten"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups">All 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-allmänheten">1. Citizens (Allmänheten)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-allmänheten"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate</p>
 
 
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-citizens-allmänheten">1. Citizens (Allmänheten)<a class="" aria-h
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sub-group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Vehicle owners (~6M)</td><td>POSITIVE — fuel cost relief</td><td>HD01FiU48: 82 öre/l petrol, 319 SEK/m³ diesel</td></tr><tr><td>Households (~3M)</td><td>POSITIVE — energy price support</td><td>HD01FiU48: el- och gasprisstöd</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm residents</td><td>NEGATIVE — police density declining</td><td>BRÅ March 2026, HD10439 (from RT-1353)</td></tr><tr><td>Women needing shelter</td><td>NEGATIVE — closures accelerating</td><td>HD10437-38 (interpellations analysis)</td></tr><tr><td>Eating disorder patients</td><td>NEGATIVE — Region Stockholm service failures</td><td>HD10442 Kallifatides → Svantesson</td></tr><tr><td>Rural residents (Vetlanda)</td><td>NEGATIVE — Skatteverket office closure</td><td>HD11732</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH | <strong>Key actor</strong>: Ordinary Swedish households facing high energy and fuel costs</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (Tidöalliansen: M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (Tidöalliansen: M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: 0–3 days</p>
 
 
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Tension</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong></td><td>SUPPORTS FiU48 — fiscal pragmatism</td><td>Svantesson under KU scrutiny simultaneously</td><td>HD01FiU48, KU G16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong></td><td>SUPPORTS FiU48 — affordability populism</td><td>No climate tension (SD opposes green taxation)</td><td>FiU48 support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</strong></td><td>SUPPORTS FiU48 + SiS reform</td><td>Infrastructure minister Carlson under pressure</td><td>HD01FiU48, SiS press release</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Liberalerna (L)</strong></td><td>Supports FiU48 via Britz vindkraft counterweight</td><td>Ideological climate tension, EU infringement risk</td><td>gov/vindkraft, HD10440</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Coalition message discipline holds for FiU48 vote. L internal tension real but manageable given vindkraft counterweight. Confidence: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Campaign 2026</p>
 
 
@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position on FiU48</th><th>Strategy</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>SILENT/AMBIVALENT — cannot oppose household relief</td><td>File interpellations on social welfare instead</td><td>HD10442, motions analysis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>OPPOSES — climate grounds</td><td>Immigration motion (HD024076) + climate</td><td>Motions synthesis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>STRONGLY OPPOSES FiU48</td><td>Alm Ericson HD024098; Lakso HD11730</td><td>HD11730, motions synthesis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>AMBIVALENT — rural voters need relief</td><td>Immigration pragmatist position</td><td>Motions synthesis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Opposition in strategic bind on FiU48 — welfare concerns require affordability support, climate concerns require opposition. S's silence is strategically rational. Confidence: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv">4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv">4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–12 months</p>
 
 
@@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry-näringsliv">4. Business/Industry (Näringsliv)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sector</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Transport/logistics</td><td>POSITIVE — 319 SEK/m³ diesel cut</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power developers</td><td>POSITIVE — new revenue sharing framework</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td></tr><tr><td>Road haulage industry</td><td>POSITIVE — diesel cost structure improved</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Energy sector</td><td>MIXED — support for renewables + fossil stabilization</td><td>FiU48 + vindkraft</td></tr><tr><td>Rural businesses</td><td>NEGATIVE — Skatteverket Vetlanda service loss</td><td>HD11732</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate–Medium</p>
 
 
@@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-civilsamhälle">5. Civil Society (Civilsamhälle)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Women's shelters</td><td>NEGATIVE — closures accelerating, pressure continues</td><td>HD10437-38 (interpellations)</td></tr><tr><td>Children's rights organizations</td><td>POSITIVE — SiS care reform improvements</td><td>2026-04-20 press release</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental groups</td><td>NEGATIVE — FiU48 climate regression</td><td>+0.3-0.5 MtCO₂e/year</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine solidarity organizations</td><td>POSITIVE — 154M SEK democracy support</td><td>2026-04-20 press release</td></tr><tr><td>Eating disorder patient groups</td><td>NEGATIVE — Region Stockholm failing on care</td><td>HD10442</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🔴 VERY HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: 47 days–4 weeks</p>
 
 
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu">6. International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Institution</th><th>Issue</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>Pay Transparency Directive non-transposition</td><td>June 7, 2026</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>Fossil subsidy monitoring re: FiU48 fuel cut</td><td>2-4 weeks</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UN/International community</strong></td><td>Gaza flotilla — Swedish citizen protection</td><td>Immediate</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nordic partners (DK/NO/FI)</strong></td><td>Sweden joining EU fossil floor — competitive concern</td><td>Medium-term</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH — EU infringement risk is structurally certain; FiU48 EU monitoring is probable</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: 2026-05-05 est.</p>
 
 
@@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional">7. Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Issue</th><th>Body</th><th>Impact</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU G16 Svantesson hearing</td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td><td>Formal observation possible</td><td>HDC220260421ou1</td></tr><tr><td>KU G34 Wallström hearing</td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td><td>Opposition historical exposure</td><td>HDC220260421ou2</td></tr><tr><td>Rättssäkerhetsproblem (Widding)</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>Systemic reform needed</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 ECHR compliance</td><td>Migrationsverket</td><td>Deportation legal risk</td><td>HD01SfU22</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧MEDIUM (depends on KU conclusions not yet published)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact Level</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>Timeline</strong>: Immediate</p>
 
 
@@ -1332,12 +1332,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion">8. Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 — Confidence: 🟩HIGH</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SCN-ID</strong>: SCN-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH across all base scenarios</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Sweden April 2026&#x3C;br/>Scenario Space))
     Base Scenarios
@@ -1348,8 +1348,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
       W1_Election[W1: Early Election Call&#x3C;br/>Coalition collapses FiU48]
       W2_EUBlock[W2: EU Emergency Block&#x3C;br/>Commission injunction]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65">B1: Smooth Coalition Passage (Probability: 65%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65">B1: Smooth Coalition Passage (Probability: 65%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: FiU48 passes chamber vote 2026-04-22 without L party defection; Vindkraft law clears committee by 2026-05-15.</p>
 <p><strong>Assumptions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-b1-smooth-coalition-passage-probability-65">B1: Smooth Coalition Pass
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Response</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government coalition</td><td>Unified messaging — "affordable energy"</td><td>Immediate</td></tr><tr><td>S opposition</td><td>Accept economic relief, escalate EU challenge</td><td>1 week</td></tr><tr><td>Business (SPBI, Skogsindustrierna)</td><td>Welcome diesel cut, monitor duration</td><td>2 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>Monitor, issue soft concern communiqué</td><td>30 days</td></tr><tr><td>Citizens (9M)</td><td>Immediate fuel price reduction at pump</td><td>Week 1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Forward Path</strong>: Coalition proceeds to Spring Budget (May), election campaign on "relief + green transition" platform. Confidence: 🟩HIGH.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18">B2: L Party Fracture (Probability: 18%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18">B2: L Party Fracture (Probability: 18%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: L Riksdag caucus splits on FiU48 — 3+ L MPs abstain or vote No, forcing minority passage.</p>
 <p><strong>Assumptions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-b2-l-party-fracture-probability-18">B2: L Party Fracture (Probability
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Response</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L party leadership</td><td>Damage control, reassert coalition loyalty</td><td>Immediate</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Amplify L "disloyalty" to consolidate SD-center coalition narrative</td><td>3 days</td></tr><tr><td>S opposition</td><td>Claim "government in chaos"</td><td>Week 1</td></tr><tr><td>Media</td><td>Focus on coalition arithmetic and stability</td><td>2 weeks</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Forward Path</strong>: Ulf Kristersson calls emergency coalition summit. Fuel cut passes with smaller margin. Coalition credibility dented entering election. Confidence: 🟧MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17">B3: EU-Forced Policy Recalibration (Probability: 17%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17">B3: EU-Forced Policy Recalibration (Probability: 17%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: European Commission issues formal challenge to FiU48 (Energy Tax Directive violation) within 14 days; Sweden forced to modify or delay implementation.</p>
 <p><strong>Assumptions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1466,18 +1466,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-b3-eu-forced-policy-recalibration-probability-17">B3: EU-Forced Polic
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Forward Path</strong>: Government issues "EU compatibility review" statement. Fuel cut delayed 30-60 days pending legal review. SD uses delay to attack government on EU "capitulation." Confidence: 🟧MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wild-card-scenarios">Wild Card Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3">W1: Early Election Triggered (Probability: 3%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wild-card-scenarios">Wild Card Scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3">W1: Early Election Triggered (Probability: 3%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1-early-election-triggered-probability-3"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: FiU48 chamber vote fails due to surprise SD-L-M internal split; Kristersson announces confidence vote; early election (before September).</p>
 <p><strong>Why Unlikely</strong>: SD is strongly pro-fuel-cut; alliance math is solid at 175+. Would require unprecedented 4-party internal collapse.</p>
 <p><strong>ACH Red Flags</strong>: Any SD opposition statement on FiU48 or any L leadership emergency meeting = escalate probability to 12%.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2">W2: EU Emergency Injunction (Probability: 2%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2">W2: EU Emergency Injunction (Probability: 2%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2-eu-emergency-injunction-probability-2"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: European Commission takes emergency action within 48 hours of FiU48 chamber vote to block implementation; first such action against a member state's supplementary budget.</p>
 <p><strong>Why Unlikely</strong>: Commission traditionally takes 2-4 weeks for formal challenges; an emergency injunction would set unprecedented precedent.</p>
 <p><strong>ACH Red Flags</strong>: Any Commission spokesperson statement on Swedish fuel taxes; any Belgian/German "level playing field" communiqué.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach"></a></h3>
 <p>For the central question: <strong>"Will FiU48 pass the chamber vote without major incident?"</strong></p>
 
 
@@ -1517,14 +1517,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-ach">Analysis of Competing Hypothese
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Consistent Evidence</th><th>Inconsistent Evidence</th><th>Diagnostic</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1: Passes unanimously</td><td>L participation (Britz), alliance math (175+), no L statements against</td><td>L's EU-alignment, fossil fuel optics</td><td>MODERATE</td></tr><tr><td>H2: Passes with L abstentions</td><td>L liberal wing, EU ETD minimum risk</td><td>No public L dissent statements today</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>H3: EU challenge issued same week</td><td>Nina Larsson delay precedent, ETD minimum risk</td><td>Commission typically 4-6 weeks for formal action</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>H4: Fails chamber vote</td><td>Zero consistent evidence</td><td>All alliance parties publicly support</td><td>NONE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Most Likely Scenario: H1</strong> (B1 Smooth Passage, 65% probability). Update this ACH if any L MP issues public statement against FiU48 before 2026-04-22 vote.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard">Scenario Monitoring Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard">Scenario Monitoring Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-monitoring-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Scenario Probability Distribution (2026-04-21)"
     x-axis ["B1 Smooth Passage", "B2 L Fracture", "B3 EU Challenge", "W1 Early Election", "W2 EU Block"]
     y-axis "Probability (%)" 0 --> 70
     bar [65, 18, 17, 3, 2]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election">Strategic Implications for 2026 Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election">Strategic Implications for 2026 Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1553,13 +1553,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-strategic-implications-for-2026-election">Strategic Implications for
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Election Outcome Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>B1 (65%)</td><td>Coalition gains 2-4% approval; "competent economic management" narrative sticks</td></tr><tr><td>B2 (18%)</td><td>L loses 1-2 seats; S gains urban center-left seats; coalition retains majority barely</td></tr><tr><td>B3 (17%)</td><td>EU compliance becomes ballot-box issue; C and L benefit as "pro-EU" parties</td></tr><tr><td>W1 (3%)</td><td>Hung parliament; S-led minority government most likely outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>RSK-ID</strong>: RSK-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Swedish Politics 2026-04-21
     x-axis "Low Likelihood" --> "High Likelihood"
@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     "R07 Energy Price Collapse": [0.20, 0.72]
     "R08 Climate Credibility Gap": [0.75, 0.70]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-risk-register">Detailed Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-risk-register">Detailed Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-detailed-risk-register">Detailed Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk Title</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I Score</th><th>Owner</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R01</strong></td><td>EU Commission queries Sweden's fuel tax cut under fossil subsidy monitoring</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td>5 (CRITICAL)</td><td><strong>15</strong></td><td>Svantesson/Government</td><td>2-4 weeks</td><td>Pre-draft EU response noting economic emergency justification</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R02</strong></td><td>L party abstention or defection on FiU48 fuel tax clause</td><td>2 (LOW-MEDIUM)</td><td>5 (CRITICAL)</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>L party leadership</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td><td>L already announced support; Britz + vindkraft law as counterweight</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R03</strong></td><td>KU G16 produces formal observation on Svantesson fiscal governance</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson</td><td>2026-05-05 est.</td><td>Transparent documentation preparation for KU submission</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R04</strong></td><td>Government's "chaos coalition" framing succeeds against 4-party coordination</td><td>2 (LOW)</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>Opposition (S/V/MP/C)</td><td>Campaign 2026</td><td>Opposition maintains strategic messaging discipline (not shared press conference)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R05</strong></td><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive infringement (non-transposition by June 7)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>Nina Larsson (L)</td><td>47 days</td><td>Fast-track transposition legislation; may require extraordinary committee session</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R06</strong></td><td>Gaza flotilla incident involving Swedish citizens</td><td>2 (LOW)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Malmer Stenergard</td><td>0-30 days</td><td>Diplomatic monitoring; consular preparedness</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R07</strong></td><td>Energy prices fall sharply before FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>2 (LOW)</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>External/market</td><td>0-3 days</td><td>Unlikely given market fundamentals; monitor Nordpool prices</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R08</strong></td><td>Climate credibility gap becomes dominant campaign narrative</td><td>4 (HIGH)</td><td>3 (MEDIUM)</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Coalition collective</td><td>Campaign 2026</td><td>Vindkraft law + three-step green package as counternarrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis">Coalition Stability Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis">Coalition Stability Risk Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef critical fill:#C62828,color:#fff
     classDef high fill:#E65100,color:#fff
@@ -1694,7 +1694,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-risk-analysis">Coalition Stability Risk Analysis<
     EU_RISK -->|"June 7 trigger"| INFRINGEMENT["EU Infringement&#x3C;br/>Proceedings"]:::critical
     KU_RISK -->|"May report"| OBSERVATION["Formal KU Observation&#x3C;br/>on Svantesson"]:::medium</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis">Risk Trends from Previous Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis">Risk Trends from Previous Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1732,7 +1732,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-trends-from-previous-analysis">Risk Trends from Previous Analysi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Yesterday (2026-04-20)</th><th>Today (2026-04-21)</th><th>Change</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R05 EU Pay Directive</td><td>HIGH (48 days)</td><td>HIGH (47 days)</td><td>⚠️ Countdown continues</td></tr><tr><td>R01 EU Commission</td><td>NOT TRACKED</td><td>HIGH (new)</td><td>🔴 New risk (FiU48 triggered)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional scrutiny</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM (KU hearings today)</td><td>↑ Elevated</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition coordination</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (21 motions confirmed)</td><td>↑ Elevated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-risk-assessment">Summary Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-risk-assessment">Summary Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Top 3 Risks requiring immediate monitoring:</strong></p>
 <ol>
 <li>
@@ -1747,13 +1747,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-risk-assessment">Summary Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidd
 </ol>
 <p><em>Confidence: 🟩HIGH | Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SWOT-ID</strong>: SWT-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quadrant-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">mindmap
   root((Sweden 2026-04-21&#x3C;br/>Political SWOT))
     STRENGTHS
@@ -1787,8 +1787,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-quadrant-mapping">Quadrant Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
       Gaza flotilla incident escalation
       Energy price collapse undermines FiU48 justification</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-full-swot-matrix">Full SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">Strengths (Coalition: Tidöalliansen M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-full-swot-matrix">Full SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">Strengths (Coalition: Tidöalliansen M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-coalition-tidöalliansen-msdkdl">Strengths (Coalition: Tid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU48 delivers immediate household relief</strong></td><td>4.1B SEK extra budget: fuel tax cut (82 öre/l petrol, 319 SEK/m³ diesel) + el-/gasprisstöd. ~6M vehicle owners and ~3M households benefit</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Majority intact</strong></td><td>175/349 Riksdag seats (M+SD+KD+L). No defections reported for FiU48</td><td>RT-1353 synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vindkraft law = green credibility</strong></td><td>Step 2 of three-step vindkraftspaket: resident revenue sharing up to 9 turbine-heights. Strategy to convert NIMBY to YIMBY</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Constitutional accountability operational</strong></td><td>KU G16 (Svantesson) + G34 (Wallström) hearings proceed — demonstrates functioning parliamentary oversight</td><td>HDC220260421ou1/ou2</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TU16 simplification</strong></td><td>Removal of mandatory introduction course for B-license practice driving — regulatory simplification message</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen">Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalliansen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen">Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalliansen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-coalition-tidöalliansen">Weaknesses (Coalition: Tidöalli
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Climate law conflict</strong></td><td>FiU48 fuel tax cut adds +0.3-0.5 MtCO₂e/year. Under Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5, government must explain incompatibility. Sweden already ~20% behind 2030 target</td><td>HD01FiU48; MP motion HD024098</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU fossil minimum floor</strong></td><td>Sweden's fuel tax cut reduces to EU Energy Tax Directive minimum — weakens negotiating position on future EU climate measures</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Andreas Carlson infrastructure accumulation</strong></td><td>9 interpellations against KD Infrastructure Minister covering rail closures, road safety, housing, airports, defense. Creates "minister in crisis" meta-narrative</td><td>HD10434 and prior IPs</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L party climate tension</strong></td><td>Liberals historically support green taxation; supporting fossil subsidy is ideological compromise. Risk of "only for the election" framing</td><td>RT-1353 scenario B</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc">Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc">Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-opposition-svmpc">Strengths (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>21-motion coordinated offensive</strong></td><td>All four major opposition parties filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 within 72 hours — historically rare multi-party coordination</td><td>HD024076-HD024089</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU legal deadline weaponization</strong></td><td>June 7, 2026 = deadline for EU Pay Transparency Directive transposition. Sofia Amloh (S) filed HD10437 directly citing deadline — external legal pressure reinforces parliamentary attack</td><td>HD10437 (from interpellations analysis)</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Women's welfare dual attack</strong></td><td>Two interpellations against Nina Larsson (L) filed same day: EU Pay Directive + women's shelter closures. "Minister failing women on two fronts" narrative</td><td>HD10437, HD10438</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Systematic accountability documentation</strong></td><td>S filed 11 of 14 most recent interpellations — building a timestamped record of government failures to mobilize in campaign</td><td>Interpellations synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc">Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc">Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-opposition-svmpc">Weaknesses (Opposition: S/V/MP/C)<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S silent on FiU48 opposition</strong></td><td>Social Democrats cannot credibly oppose fuel tax relief when households face real energy costs. Economic reality creates affordability vs. climate dilemma</td><td>RT-1353; motions synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S silent on deportation</strong></td><td>Despite filing motions on reception and housing immigration laws, S avoided HD024090/95/97 deportation cluster — revealed strategic weakness on enforcement narrative</td><td>Motions synthesis</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>"Chaos coalition" risk</strong></td><td>When four opposition parties coordinate too visibly, M+SD frame it as "opposition chaos" — hurts opposition messaging</td><td>Motions synthesis</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1967,7 +1967,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU48 + vindkraft dual narrative</strong></td><td>Government can claim both affordability AND green transition before election. Rare political win-win</td><td>2026-04-22 to election</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU constrains opposition on Wallström</strong></td><td>G34 hearing of Wallström forces S to defend prior government decisions on foreign policy</td><td>2026-05 est.</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SiS reform institutional care</strong></td><td>Government commitment to improving conditions for children in institutional care shows social welfare responsiveness</td><td>2026-04-20 (press release)</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2010,7 +2010,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Probability</th><th>Severity</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU Commission fossil subsidy challenge</strong></td><td>EU Commission may formally query Sweden's fuel tax reduction under fossil subsidy monitoring framework</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nina Larsson EU infringement (June 7)</strong></td><td>Non-transposition of EU Pay Transparency Directive = formal infringement proceedings. Electoral damage for equality-focused L party</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>4-party immigration coordination signal</strong></td><td>Opposition has demonstrated coordination capacity. Government must respond to 21 motions — response strategy risks</td><td>CONFIRMED</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>🟩HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gaza flotilla escalation</strong></td><td>Denis Begic question HD11731 — if Swedish citizens in Gaza convoy are harmed, government faces foreign policy emergency</td><td>LOW</td><td>HIGH</td><td>🟧MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot">Coalition vs Opposition SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot">Coalition vs Opposition SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Coalition vs Opposition Strength Assessment 2026-04-21
     x-axis "Weak" --> "Strong"
@@ -2029,13 +2029,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-vs-opposition-swot">Coalition vs Opposition SWOT<a class=""
     "KU Constitutional Hearings": [0.65, 0.75]</pre>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor AI Evening Analysis — Confidence: 🟩HIGH</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>THR-ID</strong>: THR-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef crit fill:#C62828,color:#fff,stroke:#900
     classDef high fill:#E65100,color:#fff,stroke:#C00
@@ -2071,8 +2071,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-network">Threat Taxonomy Network<a class="" aria-hidd
     T6 --> T6A["Stockholm police density&#x3C;br/>declining despite 10k target&#x3C;br/>(BRÅ March 2026)&#x3C;br/>Severity: 4/5 CRITICAL"]:::high
     T6 --> T6B["Judicial self-scrutiny&#x3C;br/>weakness (Widding HD10441)&#x3C;br/>Severity: 3/5 HIGH"]:::med</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-category-details">Threat Category Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-details"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-1-institutional-threats">Category 1: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-category-details">Threat Category Details<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-category-details"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-1-institutional-threats">Category 1: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2100,7 +2100,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-1-institutional-threats">Category 1: Institutional Threats<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KU G16 formal observation on Svantesson</td><td>Konstitutionsutskottet</td><td>4</td><td>KU G16 open hearing 2026-04-21</td><td>2026-05-05</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional norm erosion via executive overreach</td><td>Government</td><td>3</td><td>Background pattern across 2025/26</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-2-legislative-threats">Category 2: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-legislative-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-2-legislative-threats">Category 2: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-legislative-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-2-legislative-threats">Category 2: Legislative Threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 without climate compatibility assessment</td><td>Government</td><td>4</td><td>Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5 obligation</td><td>2026-04-22-24 vote</td></tr><tr><td>SfU22 ECHR incompatibility</td><td>Government</td><td>4</td><td>Inhibition replacing temporary permits</td><td>2026-06-01</td></tr><tr><td>21 opposition motions unaddressed</td><td>Opposition</td><td>3</td><td>HD024076-HD024089 etc.</td><td>Committee cycles</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-3-externaleu-threats">Category 3: External/EU Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-externaleu-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-3-externaleu-threats">Category 3: External/EU Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-externaleu-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2170,7 +2170,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-3-externaleu-threats">Category 3: External/EU Threats<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>EU Pay Transparency infringement</strong></td><td>EU Commission</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>June 7, 2026 transposition deadline</td><td>47 days</td></tr><tr><td>EU fossil subsidy monitoring FiU48</td><td>EU Commission</td><td>4</td><td>EU Energy Tax Directive minimum breach</td><td>2-4 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Gaza flotilla diplomatic incident</td><td>Israel/International</td><td>3</td><td>HD11731 question to Malmer Stenergard</td><td>Immediate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-4-electoral-threats">Category 4: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-electoral-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-4-electoral-threats">Category 4: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-electoral-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-4-electoral-threats">Category 4: Electoral Threats<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Opposition 4-party immigration coordination</td><td>S/V/MP/C bloc</td><td>4</td><td>21 motions including 4-party reception law cluster</td><td>Campaign 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S affordability credibility trap</td><td>Social Democrats</td><td>3</td><td>Cannot oppose FiU48 without appearing anti-household</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-5-fiscal-threats">Category 5: Fiscal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-fiscal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-5-fiscal-threats">Category 5: Fiscal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-5-fiscal-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-5-fiscal-threats">Category 5: Fiscal Threats<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 structural deficit impact</td><td>Government</td><td>3</td><td>4.1B SEK in 2026; structural budget impact</td><td>2026 fiscal year</td></tr><tr><td>Rural service closures (Skatteverket Vetlanda)</td><td>Government</td><td>2</td><td>HD11732 question</td><td>Immediate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-6-security-threats">Category 6: Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-security-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-6-security-threats">Category 6: Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-6-security-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2255,20 +2255,20 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-6-security-threats">Category 6: Security Threats<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Severity (1-5)</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Stockholm police density decline</strong></td><td>Government</td><td>4</td><td>BRÅ March 2026: only region with declining density despite 10k target</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial self-review system weakness</td><td>Rättsväsendet</td><td>3</td><td>HD10441: Widding → Strömmer on jurist-only review process</td><td>Structural</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-threat-level-assessment">Overall Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-threat-level-assessment">Overall Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-threat-level-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence Near HIGH</strong> | Overall Threat Level: <strong>HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The combination of a pending EU infringement deadline (47 days), climate law obligations triggered by FiU48, constitutional hearings on Finance Minister Svantesson, and a historically coordinated 4-party opposition offensive creates the highest threat concentration of the 2025/26 parliamentary session. The government's response to FiU48 must carefully balance immediate affordability narrative with medium-term climate and EU legal obligations.</p>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CMP-ID</strong>: CMP-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩HIGH (policy design) | 🟧MEDIUM (electoral outcome predictions)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's Swedish parliamentary activity — a pre-election fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48), renewable energy revenue-sharing law, and EU Pay Directive compliance deadline — has direct parallels in at least five EU member states. This comparative analysis benchmarks each policy against international experience.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison">1. Pre-Election Fuel Tax Cuts: Cross-EU Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison">1. Pre-Election Fuel Tax Cuts: Cross-EU Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's HD01FiU48 reduces petrol excise by 82 öre/litre through September 2026 (election day) at a cost of ~4.1B SEK. How does this compare to peer nations?</p>
 
 
@@ -2335,7 +2335,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-pre-election-fuel-tax-cuts-cross-eu-comparison">1. Pre-Election Fue
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: France is the best comparator — Macron's "remise à la pompe" was timed to the 2022 presidential election campaign. EC raised informal concerns but did not issue formal challenge. Short-term approval boost was +4%, but effect dissipated after expiry.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific risk</strong>: Sweden is closer to the EU Energy Tax Directive minimum rate than Germany or Netherlands were — making an EC formal challenge more likely than in the German case.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks">2. Wind Energy Revenue Sharing: International Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks">2. Wind Energy Revenue Sharing: International Benchmarks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks"></a></h3>
 <p>The new Swedish law (announced by Johan Britz 2026-04-21) requires turbine operators to share revenues with residents within 9 turbine-heights radius.</p>
 
 
@@ -2394,7 +2394,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-wind-energy-revenue-sharing-international-benchmarks">2. Wind Energ
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Policy</th><th>Revenue Share %</th><th>Geographic Scope</th><th>NIMBY→YIMBY Conversion</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden 2026</strong></td><td>Residents within 9 turbine-heights</td><td>~3-5% (TBC)</td><td>National</td><td>Expected — modeled on SE-Norway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Grunnrentebeskatning (2023)</td><td>40% above NOK 0.254/kWh (municipal share)</td><td>National</td><td>✅ Significant — local acceptance up 28% (COWI 2024)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Shared ownership law (2009, updated 2023)</td><td>20% local residents offer</td><td>National</td><td>✅ Strong — DK has 5,700+ turbines, lowest NIMBY rate in EU</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>§36g EEG (2021 amendment)</td><td>0.2¢/kWh to municipalities</td><td>National</td><td>🟡 Moderate — municipal income yes, resident income no</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK</strong></td><td>Community benefit funds (voluntary, 2014)</td><td>~0.5% revenue</td><td>England/Wales</td><td>🟡 Moderate — Scotland stronger (Community Ownership Fund)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Lokaal eigendom (2023 target: 50% local)</td><td>Up to 50% ownership stake</td><td>National</td><td>✅ Strong where implemented</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden is adopting a model closest to Norway's (revenue-based, geographically bounded) rather than Denmark's (shared ownership). Norway's model increased local acceptance by 28%. Sweden can expect a 15-25% acceptance increase in turbine-siting areas over 3-5 years — but the law does not yet resolve grid connection disputes (see HD11730).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison">3. Constitutional Review of Finance Ministers: Nordic Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison">3. Constitutional Review of Finance Ministers: Nordic Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison"></a></h3>
 <p>KU G16 hearing on Elisabeth Svantesson (M) on fiscal governance:</p>
 
 
@@ -2439,7 +2439,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-constitutional-review-of-finance-ministers-nordic-comparison">3. Co
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Mechanism</th><th>Frequency</th><th>Consequences</th><th>Recent Notable Case</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Konstitutionsutskott (KU) annual granskning</td><td>Annual (public hearings)</td><td>Observation (anmärkning), reputational</td><td>Svantesson G16 2026; Wallström G34 2026</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Censure possible</td><td>Jonas Gahr Støre (AP) on Acer/ACER energy (2022)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Folketing's Finansudvalget</td><td>Continuous</td><td>Rare formal censure</td><td>Treasury Minister (2021 Covid support payments)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Perustuslakivaliokunta</td><td>Constitutional review of bills</td><td>Veto power on legislation</td><td>Orpo government (2023) initial social security cuts modified</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden's KU granskning is uniquely powerful — a public hearing with named ministers who must attend in person. Svantesson is simultaneously architect of FiU48 AND under constitutional scrutiny today. This dual exposure (fiscal stimulus + constitutional accountability) creates highest-visibility day for any Swedish Finance Minister in at least 5 years.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map">4. EU Pay Transparency Directive: Member State Compliance Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map">4. EU Pay Transparency Directive: Member State Compliance Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden (Nina Larsson, L, 47 days remaining):</p>
 
 
@@ -2503,7 +2503,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-eu-pay-transparency-directive-member-state-compliance-map">4. EU Pa
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Implementation Status</th><th>Gap Risk</th><th>Approach</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong></td><td>Draft legislation pending</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Single omnibus bill (late)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Entgelttransparenzgesetz updated Jan 2026</td><td>🟢 LOW</td><td>Existing law extended</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Ligelønslov modified Mar 2026</td><td>🟢 LOW</td><td>Administrative update</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Tasa-arvolaki proposal Feb 2026</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>Still in committee</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td>Wet gelijke beloning submitted Apr 2026</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>On track</td></tr><tr><td><strong>France</strong></td><td>Index égalité professionelle extended</td><td>🟢 LOW</td><td>Existing index system</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Poland</strong></td><td>No bill introduced</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Infringement risk parallel to Sweden</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Hungary</strong></td><td>No bill introduced</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td><td>Infringement risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden is in the second-slowest tier (with Poland and Hungary in the bottom tier). The Commission is expected to issue formal letters to the 5-7 non-compliant states on June 8, the day after the deadline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis">5. Opposition Coordination Waves: Comparative Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis">5. Opposition Coordination Waves: Comparative Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's 21 coordinated S/V/MP/C counter-motions (2026-04-21) on immigration and fiscal policy:</p>
 
 
@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-opposition-coordination-waves-comparative-analysis">5. Opposition C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country/Context</th><th>Coordination Size</th><th>Issue Focus</th><th>Effectiveness</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden 2026</strong></td><td>4 parties, 21 motions, 1 day</td><td>Immigration + fiscal</td><td>TBD — election 145 days away</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sweden 2022</strong></td><td>3 parties (S-led), 14 motions</td><td>Energy price relief</td><td>High — forced government fuel rebate</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany 2023</strong></td><td>SPD+Grüne+FDP (coalition)</td><td>Budget crisis</td><td>Medium — constitutional court ruling intervened</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark 2024</strong></td><td>Socialdemokratiet+SF+EL</td><td>Green transition</td><td>High — influenced Social Housing law</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UK 2023</strong></td><td>Labour+SNP+Lib Dem</td><td>Cost of living</td><td>Low — Conservative majority overrode</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key finding</strong>: Sweden's opposition coordination is historically effective when focused on economic policy (2022 analogy). The 2026 wave is broader (immigration + fiscal) and happens with 145 days to election — giving media and voters time to process before the ballot.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026">Summary: Sweden's Position in EU Policy Space (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026">Summary: Sweden's Position in EU Policy Space (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title EU Policy Benchmarks vs Sweden 2026
     x-axis "Low Policy Ambition" --> "High Policy Ambition"
@@ -2565,12 +2565,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-swedens-position-in-eu-policy-space-april-2026">Summary: Swed
     Immigration Counter-Motions: [0.60, 0.20]</pre>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>CLS-ID</strong>: CLS-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Classification Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-decision-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef pub fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff
     classDef int fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
@@ -2598,7 +2598,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-decision-tree">Sensitivity Decision Tree<a class="" aria-
     DOC_LIST --> FRA731["HD11731: PUBLIC&#x3C;br/>Written question — diplomatic"]:::pub
     DOC_LIST --> FRA732["HD11732: PUBLIC&#x3C;br/>Written question"]:::pub</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2702,7 +2702,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification-table">Per-Document Classification Table<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Fiscal/Energy</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>10/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU16</strong></td><td>Slopat krav introduktionsutbildning</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Transport/Regulatory</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>4/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10440</strong></td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Labour/Health</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10441</strong></td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Justice/Constitutional</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10442</strong></td><td>Ätstörningsvård Region Stockholm</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Healthcare/Welfare</td><td>🟠 ELEVATED</td><td>7/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11730</strong></td><td>Utbetalningar till vindkraftskommuner</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Energy/Finance</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>5/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11731</strong></td><td>Gaza flotilla — Swedish citizens</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Foreign Policy</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL (potential)</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11732</strong></td><td>Skatteverket Vetlanda closure</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Public Services</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>4/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gov/vindkraft</strong></td><td>Vindkraft revenue sharing</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Energy Policy</td><td>🟠 ELEVATED</td><td>8/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU G16</strong></td><td>Svantesson hearing</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>8/10</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KU G34</strong></td><td>Wallström hearing</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>🟡 NORMAL</td><td>7/10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2745,7 +2745,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-domain-classification">Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Policy Domain</th><th>Documents</th><th>Combined Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD11732</td><td><strong>CRITICAL</strong> (10/10 lead)</td></tr><tr><td>Energy/Climate</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD11730, gov/vindkraft</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> (9/10 cluster)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional/Legal</td><td>HD10441, KU G16, KU G34</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> (8/10)</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare/Welfare</td><td>HD10440, HD10442</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> (7/10)</td></tr><tr><td>Transport</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td><strong>LOW</strong> (4/10)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Policy</td><td>HD11731</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> (6/10)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-publication-decision-1">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-publication-decision-1">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-publication-decision-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2772,12 +2772,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-publication-decision-1">Publication Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Article</th><th>Status</th><th>Classification</th><th>Labels</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-en.html</td><td>✅ PUBLISH</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>automated-news, evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>news/2026-04-21-evening-analysis-sv.html</td><td>✅ PUBLISH</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>automated-news, evening-analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis — Classification: PUBLIC</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>XRF-ID</strong>: XRF-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     classDef prop fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     classDef bet fill:#C62828,color:#fff
@@ -2810,7 +2810,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-graph">Document Relationship Graph<a class="" a
     IP442 -->|"Targets"| KU16
     SFU22 -->|"Opposition cluster"| MOT_FUEL</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2878,7 +2878,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-table">Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Primary dok_id</th><th>Linked dok_id(s)</th><th>Relationship Type</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:236</td><td>Bet. approves prop.</td><td>Direct</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>HD024082, HD024098</td><td>Opposition counter-motions</td><td>Adversarial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU48</strong></td><td>KU G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>Finance Minister under dual scrutiny</td><td>Parallel</td></tr><tr><td><strong>gov/vindkraft</strong></td><td>HD11730 (Lakso → Busch)</td><td>Question about wind power municipal payments</td><td>Background</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10440</strong></td><td>HD10441, HD10442</td><td>Three interpellations filed same day</td><td>Coordinated</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10442</strong></td><td>KU G16</td><td>Svantesson targeted from multiple directions</td><td>Convergent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU22</strong></td><td>HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</td><td>Opposition counter-motions to migration reform</td><td>Adversarial</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD11731</strong> (Gaza)</td><td>Prior Bernadotte interpellation (HD10435)</td><td>Foreign policy accountability chain</td><td>Sequential</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01TU16</strong></td><td>Previous driver training framework</td><td>Regulatory simplification sequence</td><td>Policy evolution</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Last 3 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (Last 3 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2921,7 +2921,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-last-3-days">Upstream Watchpoint R
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Source</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government response to Bernadotte interpellation (deadline 2026-04-30)</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>⚠️ PENDING — HD11731 new question adds pressure</td></tr><tr><td>Media framing of Spring Economic Bill HD03100 vs Nordic GDP gap</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>🔄 ACTIVE — FiU48 now framing economic relief</td></tr><tr><td>SD positioning on 21 coordinated immigration counter-motions</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>🔄 ACTIVE — SD supporting fuel cut, not engaging immigration motions</td></tr><tr><td>KU33/KU32 second reading fate post-September election</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>⚠️ PENDING — KU hearings today add context</td></tr><tr><td>EU Pay Transparency Directive infringement proceedings</td><td>2026-04-20 Evening Analysis</td><td>🔴 ESCALATING — 47 days remain</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm police density declining (BRÅ March 2026)</td><td>RT-1353 (2026-04-21)</td><td>🔄 ACTIVE — HD10439 filed as interpellation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence">Government Activity — Cross-Ministry Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence">Government Activity — Cross-Ministry Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2955,12 +2955,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-government-activity--cross-ministry-coherence">Government Activity 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Ministry</th><th>Activity Type</th><th>Coherence Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>FiU48 lead + KU hearing + HD10442 + HD11732</td><td>CONTRADICTORY — fiscal relief vs. fiscal responsibility + healthcare scrutiny</td></tr><tr><td>Climate/Labour (Britz)</td><td>Vindkraft law + HD10440 (occupational physicians)</td><td>COMPLEMENTARY — green transition + labour training</td></tr><tr><td>Justice (Strömmer)</td><td>HD10441 (rättssäkerhet) + SiS visit</td><td>PARALLEL — different dimensions of justice</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Affairs (Malmer Stenergard)</td><td>HD11731 (Gaza) + KU G34 (Wallström scrutiny)</td><td>PARALLEL — current crisis + historical scrutiny</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>MTH-ID</strong>: MTH-2026-04-21-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-21 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-quality-assessment">Analysis Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-quality-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50">Methodology Version: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-quality-assessment">Analysis Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-quality-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50">Methodology Version: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-methodology-version-ai-driven-analysis-guidemd-v50">Methodology Versi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Phase</th><th>Target Duration</th><th>Actual Duration</th><th>Quality Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Setup + MCP health</td><td>0–3 min</td><td>~3 min</td><td>✅ On target</td></tr><tr><td>Data download</td><td>3–6 min</td><td>~5 min (populate-analysis-data timeout, fallback to download-parliamentary-data)</td><td>✅ Adapted successfully</td></tr><tr><td>AI Analysis Pass 1</td><td>6–21 min</td><td>~14 min (7 core artifacts)</td><td>🟡 Compressed by context compaction</td></tr><tr><td>AI Analysis Pass 2</td><td>21–28 min</td><td>~22 min (7 additional artifacts)</td><td>✅ Full second pass</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-analysis-depth-deep">Analysis Depth: <code>deep</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-depth-deep"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysis-depth-deep">Analysis Depth: <code>deep</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-depth-deep"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3059,7 +3059,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analysis-depth-deep">Analysis Depth: <code>deep</code><a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Requirement</th><th>Target</th><th>Actual</th><th>Met?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AI iterations</td><td>2–3</td><td>2</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT stakeholders</td><td>≥7 groups</td><td>8 groups</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Charts/diagrams</td><td>≥2</td><td>9 Mermaid diagrams across artifacts</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Mindmap</td><td>Required</td><td>✅ In swot-analysis.md</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Color-coded Mermaid</td><td>≥2</td><td>4 (synthesis, swot, threat, cross-reference)</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Risk matrix (L×I)</td><td>≥4 risks</td><td>8 risks with scores</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Forward indicators</td><td>≥3</td><td>7 (synthesis-summary.md table)</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence labels</td><td>All claims</td><td>Applied (🟦/🟩/🟧/🟥)</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-tool-performance">MCP Tool Performance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-tool-performance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-tool-performance">MCP Tool Performance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-tool-performance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3112,7 +3112,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-tool-performance">MCP Tool Performance<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tool</th><th>Status</th><th>Fallback Used</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>get_sync_status</code></td><td>✅ Live (status:live 18:20 UTC)</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_anforanden</code></td><td>✅ 50 results returned</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_dokument</code></td><td>✅ 8 documents 2026-04-21</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_regering</code></td><td>✅ 10 press releases</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>search_voteringar</code></td><td>✅ (returns AU10 from 2026-03-04 — no 2026-04-21 votes yet)</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><code>get_calendar_events</code></td><td>❌ Returns HTML (known issue)</td><td>Used search_dokument bet. proxy</td></tr><tr><td><code>populate-analysis-data.ts</code></td><td>❌ Timeout (>3 min)</td><td>Used download-parliamentary-data.ts (8s)</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank <code>get_economic_data</code></td><td>✅ GDP, Inflation, Unemployment</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (from 2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation (from 2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3155,7 +3155,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation-from-2026-04-20">Upstream Watchpoi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint from 2026-04-20</th><th>Today's Update</th><th>Resolved?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 extra ändringsbudget fate</td><td>Finance Committee approved; chamber vote 2026-04-22/23</td><td>✅ RESOLVED (tracked)</td></tr><tr><td>EU Pay Directive Nina Larsson</td><td>47 days to June 7 confirmed — escalating</td><td>✅ TRACKED → risk R05</td></tr><tr><td>SD immigration positioning</td><td>SD supporting FiU48; not engaging immigration counter-motions</td><td>🔄 ONGOING</td></tr><tr><td>Bernadotte interpellation HD10435 government response deadline</td><td>2026-04-30 deadline still active</td><td>⚠️ STILL PENDING</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm police density</td><td>BRÅ data confirmed — HD10439 filed</td><td>✅ TRACKED → cross-reference</td></tr><tr><td>KU constitutional hearings</td><td>G16 (Svantesson) + G34 (Wallström) completed today</td><td>✅ NEW DEVELOPMENT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22">New Watchpoints Created for 2026-04-22+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22">New Watchpoints Created for 2026-04-22+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3198,8 +3198,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-new-watchpoints-created-for-2026-04-22">New Watchpoints Created for 2
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Priority</th><th>Trigger Condition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote result + L party bloc</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td><td>Any L abstentions = coalition fracture signal</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission fuel tax informal statement</td><td>🟠 HIGH</td><td>Commission spokesperson press briefing</td></tr><tr><td>Nina Larsson EU Pay Directive legislative update</td><td>🟠 HIGH</td><td>Bill submitted to riksdag or announced</td></tr><tr><td>Bernadotte interpellation response (deadline 2026-04-30)</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>Response filed</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law committee referral</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>Which committee receives referral</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish police officer density correction</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td><td>BRÅ follow-up or ministry response</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage-decisions">Coverage Decisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-decisions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources">Documents Analyzed (from 2026-04-21 sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage-decisions">Coverage Decisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage-decisions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources">Documents Analyzed (from 2026-04-21 sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3266,7 +3266,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-documents-analyzed-from-2026-04-21-sources">Documents Analyzed (from
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Analysis Depth</th><th>Included in Articles</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>✅ DEEP — primary analysis</td><td>✅ EN + SV lead</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — mentioned</td><td>✅ Secondary mention</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>✅ DEEP — interpellation wave analysis</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>✅ DEEP — interpellation wave analysis</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>✅ DEEP — interpellation wave analysis</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD11730</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — cross-reference</td><td>✅ Mentioned</td></tr><tr><td>HD11731</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — Gaza foreign policy</td><td>✅ Section</td></tr><tr><td>HD11732</td><td>🟡 MODERATE — Vetlanda/Skatteverket</td><td>✅ Mentioned</td></tr><tr><td>gov/vindkraft (Britz)</td><td>✅ DEEP — new law</td><td>✅ EN + SV section</td></tr><tr><td>KU G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>✅ DEEP</td><td>✅ EN + SV section</td></tr><tr><td>KU G34 (Wallström)</td><td>✅ DEEP</td><td>✅ EN + SV section</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination">Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination">Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3294,7 +3294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-pollination">Sibling Analysis Cross-Pollinatio
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Elements Borrowed</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>FiU48 timeline and vote projections</td></tr><tr><td><code>interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>Full interpellation wave context and 9 Carlson accumulation</td></tr><tr><td><code>motions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>4-party 21-motion coordination analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD10435 Gaza, police density, wind power context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-process-improvement-notes">Process Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-improvement-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-process-improvement-notes">Process Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-improvement-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong><code>get_calendar_events</code> workaround</strong>: Tool consistently returns HTML rather than calendar data. Reliable fallback: <code>search_dokument</code> with <code>doktyp: "bet"</code> + <code>organ: "KU"</code> for constitutional hearings.</li>
 <li><strong><code>populate-analysis-data.ts</code> timeout</strong>: Script times out when MCP server is slow. Use <code>download-parliamentary-data.ts</code> as first-choice — faster, targeted, reliable.</li>
@@ -3303,7 +3303,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-process-improvement-notes">Process Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-
 <li><strong>Economic data</strong>: World Bank SDK returns reliable data; IMF MCP not used this run (not needed given World Bank sufficiency).</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-quality-confidence-assessment">Quality Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quality-confidence-assessment">Quality Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quality-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Overall Analysis Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <ul>
 <li>14 artifacts created (9 core + 5 Tier-C)</li>
@@ -3317,7 +3317,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-quality-confidence-assessment">Quality Confidence Assessment<a class=
 </ul>
 <p><em>Produced by Riksdagsmonitor Evening Analysis v5.0 | 2026-04-21</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 18:24 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_propositioner, get_motioner, get_betankanden, search_voteringar, search_anforanden, get_fragor, get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 180
@@ -3331,7 +3331,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 30 documents</li>
@@ -3341,7 +3341,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21">Date-Filtered Documents for 2026-04-21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21">Date-Filtered Documents for 2026-04-21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3411,7 +3411,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-date-filtered-documents-for-2026-04-21">Date-Filtered Documents for 2
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Typ</th><th>Organ</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>bet</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>10/10</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning</td><td>bet</td><td>TU</td><td>4/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>ip</td><td>-</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>ip</td><td>-</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Uttalanden om ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm</td><td>ip</td><td>-</td><td>7/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD11730</td><td>Utbetalningar till vindkraftskommuner</td><td>frå</td><td>-</td><td>5/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD11731</td><td>Sveriges agerande för att skydda sina medborgare i Gazaflottiljen</td><td>frå</td><td>-</td><td>6/10</td></tr><tr><td>HD11732</td><td>Planerad nedläggning av Skatteverkets kontor i Vetlanda</td><td>frå</td><td>-</td><td>4/10</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references">Sibling Analysis Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references">Sibling Analysis Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3443,11 +3443,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-cross-references">Sibling Analysis Cross-References<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling Type</th><th>Documents</th><th>Key Finding</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>committeeReports</td><td>14 (HD01FiU48 + 13 others)</td><td>FiU48 10/10; SfU22 9/10; KU32/KU33 8/10</td></tr><tr><td>interpellations</td><td>14 (HD10437-HD10439 + prior)</td><td>S accountability offensive; EU Pay Directive 47-day deadline</td></tr><tr><td>motions</td><td>21 (opposition cluster 2026-04-13-17)</td><td>4-party coordinated immigration counter-motions</td></tr><tr><td>realtime-1353</td><td>7 (HD01FiU48 + KU hearings + IPs)</td><td>FiU48 + vindkraft law = coalition "affordability+green"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 World Bank data: GDP 0.82% (2024), Inflation 2.84% (2024), Unemployment 8.69% (2025)
 Calendar API: HTML response (fallback document search used)
 Data freshness: Live (synced 2026-04-21T18:20:23Z)</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3492,7 +3509,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:07.694Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:29.113Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html b/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html
index 490a7e9ab8..c7fec92f75 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.836Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:29.263Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:07.836Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:29.263Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:07.836Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:29.263Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -229,10 +229,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Audience</strong></td><td>Editors-in-chief · political advisors · party whips · newsroom planners</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading time</strong></td><td>3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed <strong>21 coordinated counter-motions</strong> against the government's spring legislative package — the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive of the 2025/26 riksmöte</strong>. The <strong>headline finding</strong> is a historically rare <strong>four-party convergence on a single proposition</strong> (prop. 2025/26:229, <em>New Reception Law</em>) within 72 hours, with each party filing a distinct but mutually reinforcing frame. This establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-things-to-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-things-to-know"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>This is campaign-narrative construction, not coalition rehearsal.</strong> ACH analysis assigns P=0.50 to the campaign-narrative hypothesis vs P=0.35 to coalition-rehearsal. The opposition is locking in timestamped talking points before the summer recess, not preparing to govern.</p>
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidd
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Cluster
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th>Parties</th><th>Watch Out For</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td><strong>Reception Law (4-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande Q2 2026; L backbench sympathy for C's phased amendment</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td><strong>Deportation (3-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>V, C, MP (not S)</td><td>C's statutory proportionality test converges with European mainstream — realistic SfU amendment path</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>S, MP</td><td>Only Germany 2022 Tankrabatt is direct precedent — did not extend. Klimatlagen §5 accountability trigger.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td>V, MP</td><td>Post-NATO positioning; MP's end-user review language aligns with Norway/Netherlands/Germany — mainstream, not outlier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Proba
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Opposition outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 BASE — Government retained, all 4 propositions enacted</td><td align="center"><strong>0.45</strong></td><td>Campaign material only; no reversal within electoral horizon</td></tr><tr><td>🔵 BULL — S-led minority, reception-law partial reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.22</strong></td><td>Partial win: reception + fuel tax reversed; deportation retained</td></tr><tr><td>🔴 BEAR (for government) — S+V+MP+C majority, full reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td><td>Full package reversed; C's HD024095 language adopted statutorily</td></tr><tr><td>⚡ WILDCARD — Inconclusive election / snap re-election</td><td align="center"><strong>0.05</strong></td><td>Motion package becomes amendment-by-amendment negotiation currency</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Why it matters</th><th>Update signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R01</strong> Polarisation lock-in (L×I=25)</td><td>Government has 62% voter support floor on immigration; opposition narrative capped below that floor</td><td>Novus monthly migration-salience polling</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R08</strong> Unemployment context (L×I=16)</td><td>8.69% unemployment 2025 amplifies anti-immigration framing</td><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB, May 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R07</strong> C as pivot party (L×I=12)</td><td>C's HD024095 proportionality amendment could break 4-party front if negotiated</td><td>C leader public statement on SfU amendment posture</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Signal</th><th>What to prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td>Amendment-vote sequencing guidance</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C leader public statement on HD024095</td><td>Updated risk R07 scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union statement on fuel tax</td><td>Rural-voter risk R03 update</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235</td><td>Full cluster scoring update</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>BASE / BULL / BEAR scenario Bayesian update</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Re
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Four opposition parties file coordinated counter-motions against immigration package — historically rare"</td><td>Dok_ids HD024076/80/87/89 within 72 h</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"S's anti-privatisation stance on asylum housing aligns with Nordic peer practice — Sweden is the outlier"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"C's proportionality amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland statutory practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §2</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt — the only peer precedent for Sweden's fuel-tax cut — was not extended"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"MP's arms-export end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, post-2021 German practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Opposition is coalition-ready for post-2026 government" — ACH P=0.35 only; Red-Team critique applies</li>
 <li>❌ "Four-party coordination means S+V+MP+C majority is likely after election" — BEAR scenario P=0.10</li>
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually W
 <li>❌ "Fuel-tax opposition is anti-working-class" — S's HD024082 is a <em>return-with-new-proposal</em> motion, not a cost-of-living rejection</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deeper-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deeper-reading"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Full ACH + Red-Team + cross-cluster interference</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — 4-party division of labour</li>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -493,38 +493,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 13:10 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Significance</strong></td><td>9.0/10 (Raw) · <strong>9.40 DIW-weighted</strong> on LEAD cluster</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td>PUBLISH IMMEDIATELY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority</strong></td><td><strong>P1</strong> (electoral/policy decisive)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Quality Tier</strong></td><td>🏆 <strong>REFERENCE EXEMPLAR</strong> for opposition-motion analysis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Next Review</strong></td><td>2026-04-27</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 the Swedish opposition filed <strong>21 motions</strong> concentrated in <strong>four coordinated clusters</strong>. The April 2026 wave is the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive</strong> of the 2025/26 riksmöte and establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. Four of the clusters cross filing-time thresholds that constitute <em>prima facie</em> evidence of coordination: the reception-law cluster sees <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions to a single proposition within <strong>72 hours</strong> — historically rare and the headline finding of this dossier. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p>The dominant strategic-logic hypothesis (ACH: P=0.50) is <strong>campaign-narrative construction</strong> rather than coalition-rehearsal or opportunistic signalling. The opposition is using the final pre-election Riksdag cycle to <strong>lock in timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer recess. This distinguishes the April 2026 wave from prior clusters. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Twenty-one opposition motions filed between April 13–17, 2026 represent the most coordinated parliamentary opposition offensive in the current riksmöte. In an historically rare manoeuvre, all four major opposition parties — <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>, <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>, <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>, and <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> — simultaneously filed counter-motions against the government's flagship immigration legislation package, signalling that immigration policy will be the defining battleground of Sweden's September 2026 election.</p>
 <p>The motions target three simultaneous government propositions on immigration (prop. 2025/26:229, 2025/26:235, and 2025/26:215) while also challenging the government's environmentally inconsistent fuel tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236), arms export expansion (prop. 2025/26:228), and healthcare and justice reforms. Sweden's deteriorating economic context — with unemployment rising to 8.69% in 2025 and GDP growth slowing to 0.82% in 2024 — frames a policy environment in which the government has electoral advantage on immigration but exposure on climate credibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 (New Reception Law) within a 72-hour window. <strong>Dok_ids</strong>: HD024076 (V, Tony Haddou), HD024080 (S, Ida Karkiainen), HD024087 (MP, Annika Hirvonen), HD024089 (C, Niels Paarup-Petersen). The filings are a <strong>deliberate division of labour</strong>: V stakes the principled-left position, S anchors welfare-state protection (anti-privatisation), MP internationalises via EU Pact compatibility, C occupies pragmatist-centrist ground with a phased amendment.</p>
 <p>The absence of a joint press conference is strategic: <strong>claimed coordination would attract "coalition of chaos" framing</strong>, whereas parallel messaging projects discipline without vulnerability. Analytically, the division-of-labour pattern survives every available attack vector — a Tidö-aligned attack on V's frame fails against C; an attack on C fails against S. <strong>This is defence-in-depth messaging</strong>, a hallmark of mature opposition tradecraft. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportation — V outright rejection HD024090, C proportionality amendment HD024095, MP partial rejection HD024097) and three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:215 (time-limited housing — V HD024077, S HD024079, MP HD024086). Total immigration motions: <strong>10 of 21 (48%)</strong> — the opposition has made immigration its primary electoral narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>New analytic observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>S is silent on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) while filing on every other immigration track. This is a <strong>revealed strategic choice</strong>: S has concluded that deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party in the current public-opinion environment (70%+ support deportation of convicted foreigners per SOM 2025). The silence signals S's 2026 campaign architecture — <strong>own the economic-welfare immigration narrative, avoid the security-enforcement narrative</strong>. This materially changes post-election coalition calculus: S is not a reliable ECHR-litigation partner post-adoption.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h4>
 <p>S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose the fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. With Sweden's GDP growth at only 0.82% (2024) and 2023 at –0.2%, the government's choice to cut fuel taxes in a supplementary budget creates a credibility gap on climate.</p>
 <p><strong>Quantified climate impact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cut is estimated to add <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> to a 2030 trajectory Sweden is already ~20% behind (Naturvårdsverket 2025). Under Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5, the government must explain incompatibility to parliament — this creates a statutory basis for ongoing challenge by Klimatpolitiska rådet. MP's HD024098 anchors this claim.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative precedent <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut — and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> due to poor electoral payoff.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h4>
 <p>V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation modernization. V's motion explicitly requests rejection of the entire proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports including follow-up deliveries to human rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-NATO context <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024. Public opinion on arms exports has shifted to 58/32/10 favourable (SOM 2025) from 45/45/10 (2021). The cluster is therefore <strong>low electoral consequence but high post-election negotiation value</strong>: if any 2026–2030 government configuration requires V or MP support, HD024091/96 positions become immediate coalition constraints. MP's end-user review language (HD024096) is aligned with Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice — <strong>mainstream Northern European, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h4>
 <p>Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject prop. 2025/26:216 on medical competence in municipal healthcare. C's opposition is the most striking given its centre-right profile — the party argues the reform reduces municipal flexibility and should be redesigned.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-2026 coalition signal <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: S+V+C convergence on healthcare governance is a rehearsal for a potential post-election minority-government working relationship. Coupled with C's amendment position on deportation (HD024095), this is the strongest coalition-rehearsal signal in the cluster.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Counter-hypothesis</strong>: What if the entire cluster has negligible strategic value?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — D
 <p><strong>Red-Team posterior</strong>: The cluster's expected value is <strong>tactical (talking-points, media cycle control)</strong> rather than <strong>strategic (coalition-rehearsal, government-formation preparation)</strong>. The dossier's findings remain valid but the <strong>political-consequence magnitude should be calibrated down</strong>: this is a good campaign input, not a realignment event.</p>
 <p><strong>Integration with main analysis</strong>: We accept the Red-Team critique at 30% weight. It modifies the narrative — this is <strong>the best-coordinated tactical opposition offensive of the riksmöte</strong>, but it is not a strategic re-alignment. See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5 for the scenario-tree consequences.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fiscal, defence, healthcare), rhetorical interference between clusters creates exploitable vectors.</p>
 
 
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference
 <p><strong>Critical finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>"V universal rejectionist"</strong> frame (rows 1, 6) is V's single largest electoral vulnerability. V must sequence its rhetoric to pair rejection with concrete alternatives (e.g., border-capacity investment, Ukraine-lethal-aid affirmation) or lose 1–2 polling points to SD attack ads. V's HD024076, HD024090, and HD024091 texts currently all lead with principled-rejection language; SD will highlight this uniformity.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypoth
 <p>Full ACH analysis: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §1</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessme
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td>Immigration becomes binary-choice election — government "border security" vs opposition "humanitarian alternative"</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition Scenarios</td><td>Current M/SD/KD/L majority retained P=0.50; S-led minority P=0.33; S+V+MP+C majority P=0.12</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Voter Salience</td><td>62% of Swedes support stricter immigration — government has current polling advantage</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Campaign Vulnerability</td><td>Government exposed on climate (fuel tax) and healthcare (3-party opposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Legacy</td><td>If government wins 2026, all four propositions become law and define a decade</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster Value to Opposition</td><td>Tactical (talking points) ≫ Strategic (coalition rehearsal)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (Red-Team adjusted)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government will pass all four immigration+fiscal propositions (prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Immigration will be #1 election issue in 2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax opposition will provide opposition climate narrative</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C will negotiate on deportation proportionality in SfU</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>S will file follow-on motion on 2026–2027 deportation legislation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (P≈0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition forms alternative majority after 2026</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW (P=0.12)</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR issues pilot-judgment vs Sweden within 5 years post-adoption of 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Updates which analysis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> RR1</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C-leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> DR4</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union public position (Transportarbetareförbundet) on fuel tax</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> FR4</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Reception RR2, scenario BULL prior</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Deportation DR5, scenario prior</td></tr><tr><td>May–June 2026</td><td>SfU/FiU/UU chamber votes</td><td>All clusters — locks in BASE scenario</td></tr><tr><td>Rolling</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>Cross-cluster political-consequence magnitude</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>:
 "Four Opposition Parties Unite Against Sweden's Immigration Package in Unprecedented Parliamentary Challenge"</p>
 <p><strong>Alternative Title (EN)</strong>:
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadat
 <p><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>:
 "S, V, MP och C lämnar samordnade motioner mot tre invandringspropositioner medan Socialdemokraterna också utmanar regeringens sänkning av bränsleskatten inför 2026 års val."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a cl
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) multiplier applied per-cluster based on legislative axis (constitutional / electoral / policy / fiscal / international); (2) per-dimension sensitivity analysis ±10%; (3) confidence-weighted ranking.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok_id(s)</th><th>Topic</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW mult.</th><th align="center"><strong>DIW score</strong></th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Electoral</th><th align="center">Coalition risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89</td><td><strong>New Reception Law</strong> — 4-party</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">×0.94</td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td>HD024090/95/97</td><td><strong>Stricter Deportation</strong> — 3-party</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">×0.98</td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td>HD024077/79/86</td><td>Time-Limited Housing — 3-party</td><td align="center">8.8</td><td align="center">×0.93</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD024082/98</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax Cut</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">8.3</td><td align="center">×0.99</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD024091/96</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">7.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>HD024078/84/85</td><td>Crime-Victim Compensation</td><td align="center">7.2</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>HD024081/83/94</td><td>Municipal Healthcare Competence</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>6.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>HD024088</td><td>Consumer Credit Law</td><td align="center">5.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>5.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h3>
 <p>Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects <strong>how much the legislative axis changes the political-system reality</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -1114,8 +1114,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact We
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Multiplier</th><th>Reasoning</th><th>Applied clusters</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td>Highest; alters state powers / rights</td><td>— (none in this cluster set)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral-definitional</strong></td><td align="center">0.98</td><td>Defines a campaign narrative that shapes voter choice</td><td>Deportation (×0.98)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy-defining</strong></td><td align="center">0.94</td><td>Establishes policy architecture persistent ≥ 2 legislative cycles</td><td>Reception (×0.94)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal / climate</strong></td><td align="center">0.99</td><td>Near-full weight; immediate budget + climate-trajectory effects</td><td>Fuel tax (×0.99)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International / defence-industrial</strong></td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>High but conditional on coalition formation</td><td>Arms export (×0.97)</td></tr><tr><td>Social-policy adjustment</td><td align="center">0.93</td><td>Significant but narrower policy scope</td><td>Housing (×0.93)</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory / sectoral</td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>Narrow; affects specific sector only</td><td>Consumer credit (×0.97)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Why DIW matters</strong>: Raw scoring treats all 10-point policy impacts identically. DIW discounts narrower-scope reforms while preserving the full weight of electoral-definitional ones. The result is a <strong>ranking that reflects decision-consequence for the 2026 election</strong>, not merely policy novelty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception L
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Replaces 1994 reception act; introduces private-operator clauses + duty architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>4-party filing within 72 h — unprecedented in current riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Immigration #1 issue in Novus Q1 2026; 62% voter stricter-immigration support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Virtually guaranteed front-page story in SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Government majority; opposition cannot defeat but can amend (C's proportionality)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>10.0/10</strong></td><td>Mean across dimensions (normalised to 10)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.94 (policy-defining axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Dep
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Expands deportation criteria significantly; ECHR proportionality concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>3-party (V+C+MP); <strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Deportation is SD's flagship issue; government-advantage terrain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Tabloid-friendly; C's proportionality amendment drives nuance coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">7/10</td><td>Government majority; C amendment realistic path via L backbench</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.0/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.98 (electoral-definitional axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 20
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Budget-line impact; ~0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year trajectory impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">6/10</td><td>2-party (S+MP); V notably absent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Cost-of-living 74% Novus Q1 2026 priority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Regional media angle (Norrland rural split)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Extra-budget fast-track; definitional government outcome</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.3/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.99 (fiscal/climate axis — near-full weight)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1310,8 +1310,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivi
 <p><strong>Sensitivity verdict <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The LEAD story (reception law) is robust against all tested perturbations. Ranks 3–4 (fuel tax / housing) are tied within uncertainty bands — either could be elevated with minor coordination evidence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-story-decision"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-decision"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this leads</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Historical rarity</strong> — 4-party coordination on single proposition within 72 h is unprecedented in current riksmöte</li>
@@ -1319,14 +1319,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW
 <li><strong>Policy impact</strong> — replaces a 31-year-old reception act with new architecture</li>
 <li><strong>Division-of-labour messaging</strong> — each party occupies distinct rhetorical space, defence-in-depth narrative</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this co-leads despite lower raw</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Electoral-definitional axis</strong> (DIW ×0.98) — nearly full weight</li>
 <li><strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong> — a rare case where <strong>absence</strong> of evidence is primary evidence</li>
 <li><strong>C's statutory proportionality amendment is the most legally-workable opposition motion</strong> in the entire wave</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why secondary</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Climate-fiscal contradiction</strong> provides the opposition's strongest government-credibility attack</li>
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW
 <li>Narrative carries cleanly into summer 2026 European Parliament Fit-for-55 review cycle</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metad
 <p><strong>Article decision</strong>: PUBLISH — CRITICAL political intelligence
 <strong>Article priority</strong>: <strong>P1</strong> (Immediate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — BLUF builds from LEAD cluster</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — scenario priors use DIW-weighted ranks</li>
@@ -1388,17 +1388,17 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:07 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026, with special focus on the immigration cluster (10 motions), fuel tax/climate cluster (2 motions), and arms export cluster (2 motions).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary concerns</strong>: Cost of living, housing, employment security, public safety
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: HIGH — immigration, fuel costs, healthcare all directly affect citizens</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Rural Swedes</strong> (fuel tax): Government's fuel tax cut benefits rural citizens who depend on cars. S's opposition (HD024082) risks alienating this group. Approximately 30% of Swedish workforce commutes by car in rural areas.</li>
 <li><strong>Welfare-dependent citizens</strong> (reception law): The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) affects S's and MP's core voter base — those who believe in comprehensive public services for asylum seekers.</li>
@@ -1407,10 +1407,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — citizen polling data consistently shows immigration as #1 concern</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Will pass all three immigration propositions plus extra budget
 <strong>Motivation</strong>: Tidö agreement mandate + electoral positioning for 2026</p>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong>: Supports all three immigration propositions as part of Tidö agreement. Welcomes the opposition's unified rejection — it confirms M's electoral thesis that only the right-of-centre coalition will enforce Sweden's borders.</li>
 <li><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong>: Strongly supports stricter deportation (HD024090/95/97 motivate their base by showing "the establishment is defending criminals"). New reception law validates SD's decade-long campaign.</li>
@@ -1419,9 +1419,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — coalition voting patterns are predictable</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Coordinated challenge on immigration, fiscal, and defense policy</p>
-<h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> — 6 motions (HD024079/80/82/84/78/81):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Magdalena Andersson's S is pursuing a two-track strategy: (1) accepting some security reform (not opposing deportation outright) while (2) protecting welfare state principles (anti-privatization in HD024080, integration investment in HD024079)</li>
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sectors affected</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Transport/Logistics</strong>: Opposes S+MP fuel tax position; benefits from government's fuel tax cut</li>
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Key conflict</strong>: Transport industry backs government on fuel tax; financial sector cautiously supports C on consumer credit amendment. The business community is fragmented on these motions, with no unified position.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Organizations most vocal</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong>: Opposes prop. 2025/26:229 (new reception law) — supports S, V, MP, C counter-motions</li>
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Civil society is the most organized constituency supporting opposition motions</strong> on immigration.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>EU Commission concerns</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) must comply with EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024)</li>
@@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — EU enforcement timeline is long; NATO pressure is real but informal</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional dimensions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Proportionality in deportation</strong>: C's HD024095 is legally robust — "systematic repeated offenses over time" aligns with ECHR Article 8. If the government ignores this, administrative courts may strike down individual deportation orders.</li>
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a c
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Council on Legislation) has been consulted on all three immigration propositions. Opposition motions reflect areas where Lagrådet expressed reservations.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — constitutional review bodies have long timelines</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Dominant media narrative</strong> (expected coverage):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SVT Nyheter</strong>: "Fyra partier mot ny mottagandelag" (Four parties against new reception law) — likely to be front-page story</li>
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Swedish media behavior on immigration stories is well-established</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Supports["Supports Opposition Motions"]
         CS[Civil Society 🌿&#x3C;br/>Strong support]
@@ -1543,9 +1543,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class=
     style GOV fill:#dc3545,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#007bff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h3>
 <p>Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the influence-network analysis below. Listing is grouped by role category.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamenta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key motion(s)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Ida Karkiainen</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024080</td><td>Reception privatisation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Ardalan Shekarabi</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024079</td><td>Time-limited housing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024082</td><td>Fuel-tax fiscal framing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tony Haddou</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024076</td><td>Reception rights frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Håkan Svenneling</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024091</td><td>Arms-export rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>Janine Alm Ericson</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Party leader + HD024098</td><td>Fuel-tax climate frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>Annika Hirvonen</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024087</td><td>EU Pact compatibility</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>Jacob Risberg</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024096</td><td>Arms end-user review</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td><strong>Niels Paarup-Petersen</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Lead signatory HD024089/95</td><td>Phased amendment + proportionality</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td><strong>Martin Ådahl</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Economic-policy spokesperson</td><td>HD024088 consumer credit</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key decision point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">13</td><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Prime Minister</td><td>Government-wide messaging discipline</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong></td><td align="center">SD</td><td>Tidö signatory</td><td>SD attack-ad strategy owner</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong></td><td align="center">KD</td><td>Deputy PM</td><td>Crime-victim / parent-liability tension</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong></td><td align="center">L</td><td>Tidö party leader</td><td><strong>🔶 Weak link</strong> — rule-of-law sensitivity on proportionality</td></tr><tr><td align="center">17</td><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Migration minister</td><td>Reception-law defence + SfU engagement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Institution</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">18</td><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Council on Legislation</td><td>Yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235 (Q2 2026) — single most consequential pending signal</td></tr><tr><td align="center">19</td><td><strong>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</strong></td><td>Riksdag committee</td><td>Potential constitutional review</td></tr><tr><td align="center">20</td><td><strong>Migrationsöverdomstolen</strong></td><td>Migration Court of Appeal</td><td>Post-adoption administrative review venue</td></tr><tr><td align="center">21</td><td><strong>ECtHR (Strasbourg)</strong></td><td>European Court of Human Rights</td><td>3–5 year pilot-judgment potential on deportation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role in this cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">22</td><td><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong></td><td>Joint remissvar on prop. 2025/26:229 expected</td></tr><tr><td align="center">23</td><td><strong>Rädda Barnen</strong></td><td>Child-welfare concerns on private-operator reception</td></tr><tr><td align="center">24</td><td><strong>Amnesty Sverige</strong></td><td>Critical brief on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">25</td><td><strong>Caritas Sverige</strong></td><td>Reception-law humanitarian coalition</td></tr><tr><td align="center">26</td><td><strong>RFSL</strong></td><td>LGBTQ-asylum deportation concerns</td></tr><tr><td align="center">27</td><td><strong>Diakonia</strong></td><td>Arms-export human-rights advocacy</td></tr><tr><td align="center">28</td><td><strong>Svenska Freds- och Skiljedomsföreningen</strong></td><td>Arms-export policy critique</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business--industry"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Sector</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">29</td><td><strong>Saab AB (Linköping ~15k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Quiet pro-2025/26:228 lobbying; opposes V+MP cluster</td></tr><tr><td align="center">30</td><td><strong>BAE Systems Sweden (Karlskoga ~8k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Aligned with Saab on export flexibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center">31</td><td><strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong></td><td>Labour union</td><td><strong>🔶 Split risk</strong> — may publicly back government fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td align="center">32</td><td><strong>Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR)</strong></td><td>Municipal association</td><td>Concerned about reception-law municipal-capacity burden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">33</td><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet</strong></td><td>Annual Klimatlagen §5 accountability report — key fuel-tax lever</td></tr><tr><td align="center">34</td><td><strong>MSB (Myndigheten för samhällsskydd)</strong></td><td>Disinformation / CIB monitoring</td></tr><tr><td align="center">35</td><td><strong>FOI (Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut)</strong></td><td>Foreign-influence analysis</td></tr><tr><td align="center">36</td><td><strong>ISP (Inspektionen för strategiska produkter)</strong></td><td>Arms-export authorisation authority</td></tr><tr><td align="center">37</td><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket</strong></td><td>Climate-trajectory evidence base</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Actors tracked</strong>: 37 (minimum threshold: 20). ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph OppLeaders["Opposition Leaders"]
         MA["Magdalena Andersson S"]
@@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Clust
 <p><strong>Influence-network reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The key <strong>bridging nodes</strong> are (1) Paarup-Petersen's amendment path to Pehrson (L backbench) — the only opposition → Tidö bridge; (2) <strong>Lagrådet</strong> as the single institutional actor with power to change the government's substantive terms; (3) <strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong> as the split-risk node that could fragment S's working-class narrative on fuel tax. These three nodes deserve disproportionate monitoring effort.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fracture-probability-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h3>
 <p>Where can the opposition coalition fracture, and with what probability?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 Opposition coalition holds&#x3C;br/>through June 2026 chamber votes"]
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class=""
 <p><strong>Highest-probability fracture <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>F5</strong> (SD attack ads force V rejectionism revision). Opposition must execute <strong>M5</strong> (V pairs rejection with concrete alternative) as matter of priority. Next-highest: <strong>F1</strong> (C negotiates). Mitigation <strong>M1</strong> (amendment-first sequencing) addresses both F1 and F3 simultaneously — single highest-leverage move.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Cross-Cluster Interference — influence patterns</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS — stakeholder-informed strategy derivations</li>
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2037,7 +2037,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative ("opposition coordination builds toward 2026 electoral gain"), surface wildcards, and assign prior probabilities that can be updated as forward indicators fire.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <p>Applied to the central question: <em>What is the strategic logic of the April 14–17 opposition-motion wave?</em></p>
 
 
@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: T
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: The opposition's goal is not to prepare for government (too early, polls insufficient) but to <strong>lock in 2026 campaign narratives</strong> before the Riksdag recesses in summer 2026. Motions function as <strong>timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer silence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>Cluster filed"]
 
@@ -2132,8 +2132,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2
 <p>Probabilities are <strong>analyst priors</strong>, zero-sum within each branch. They update as Lagrådet yttranden, polling data, and SfU rapporteur reports arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: SfU/FiU/UU straight-reject opposition motions in May–June; government retains majority in September; all four propositions become law; opposition runs them as 2026–2030 campaign material but cannot reverse them.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BASE:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government R
 <li>Reputational: moderate (climate, possible ECtHR adverse deportation judgment)</li>
 <li>Electoral: favourable to government until 2030</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S-led minority with MP support (±V) but not C; reception-law partial reversal via amendment in Q1 2027. Deportation law retained (S silence locks in). Fuel tax cut reversed. Arms export framework unchanged.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BULL:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BUL
 <li>MP achieves symbolic but not decisive influence</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Partial victory for opposition narrative</strong>: reception and fuel tax reversed; deportation and arms retained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S+V+MP+C 175+ majority; full reversal of reception law, fuel tax, and partial reversal of deportation via statutory proportionality test (HD024095 adopted).</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BEAR-for-government:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Gov
 <li>Sweden climate 2030 target back within plausible range</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Low-probability but high-impact</strong>: requires simultaneous Tidö collapse and opposition discipline — historically rare.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces no 175+ majority configuration; months of negotiation; eventual minority government with no clear mandate. Motions cluster becomes <strong>negotiation currency</strong> rather than governing programme.</p>
 <p><strong>Consequences:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2200,7 +2200,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "M
 <li>Political system instability with 1-2 year horizon for re-election</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Opposition should prepare</th><th>Government should prepare</th><th>Newsroom should prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BASE</td><td>2026–2030 campaign narrative; post-adoption litigation strategy; NGO alliance</td><td>Implementation plan; defensive communications</td><td>Multi-year implementation tracker</td></tr><tr><td>BULL</td><td>Reception-law repeal legislation; coalition-agreement provisions</td><td>Damage-control communications; alternative legislation</td><td>S-leader interview series; legal-analysis series</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR</td><td>Full reversal legislation; new Reception Act drafting; statutory proportionality text</td><td>Post-loss narrative; policy-continuity carve-outs</td><td>Election-reversal analysis; comparative restoration precedents</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD</td><td>Amendment-by-amendment playbook</td><td>Holding-pattern communications</td><td>Minority-government instability explainer</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate</strong>: What if the entire cluster is strategically irrelevant?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a
 <p><strong>Integration</strong>: This Red-Team critique reduces the BASE scenario's political-consequence magnitude, not its probability. The overall scenario tree remains valid; the expected utility to the opposition shrinks.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update
 <p><strong>Update procedure</strong>: Re-score scenario tree when any of these signals fire. If posteriors shift the BASE/BULL/BEAR ranking, update <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>executive-brief.md</code> accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph EarlyNegotiation["Early Negotiation (May-June 2026)"]
         SfU["SfU votes&#x3C;br/>(Reception + Deportation + Housing)"]
@@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — C
     style Implementation fill:#1565C0,color:#FFF
     style Reversal fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — An
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H2 (campaign-narrative) as dominant hypothesis</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Fits evidence pattern; disconfirms available for H1/H3</td></tr><tr><td>BASE scenario probability (0.45)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Polling stable; no Tidö-collapse signals</td></tr><tr><td>BULL scenario probability (0.22)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>S-led minority is plausible but requires favourable polling swings</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR scenario probability (0.10)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historically rare; requires Tidö collapse + opposition unity</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD probability (0.05)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Minority-gov volatility possible but 2022 showed parliament can resolve</td></tr><tr><td>Red-Team posterior (cluster value is tactical not strategic)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Compelling counter-case but not decisive</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian update magnitudes</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Calibrated on historical analogues, but Swedish politics idiosyncratic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> — LEAD story selection and findings</li>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — 14-day watch window</li>
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) Bayesian prior probabilities with forward signals that update L; (2) ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) assessment; (3) risk interconnection graph showing cascade dependencies; (4) scenario-linked risk weighting per <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Likelihood (L)</strong>: 1 (very unlikely) → 5 (near-certain). Expressed with Bayesian prior P(L≥3).</li>
 <li><strong>Impact (I)</strong>: 1 (minimal) → 5 (transformational). Impact magnitude: electoral seats, legislative outcomes, reputational cost.</li>
@@ -2638,8 +2638,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">R#</th><th>Risk description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Band</th><th align="center">Prior P(L≥3)</th><th>Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R01</strong></td><td>Government passes immigration bills over opposition → polarisation lock-in before 2026 election</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>25</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td>Opposition bloc</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R02</strong></td><td>New Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) faces legal challenge at Admin Court on EU Pact / ECHR grounds</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>Government + MP (litigation-support)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R03</strong></td><td>Opposition fuel-tax stance alienates rural voters — S loses seats in Norrland constituencies</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>S Norrland apparatus</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R04</strong></td><td>Arms-export counter-motions (V+MP) create post-2026 coalition-formation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>V + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R05</strong></td><td>Healthcare reform (SoU) passes with S+V+C opposition → implementation friction</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td>Government + SKR</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R06</strong></td><td>Crime-victim compensation changes (prop. 2025/26:214) create unintended consequences for child welfare</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>Socialstyrelsen</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R07</strong></td><td>C breaks from opposition consensus on deportation → negotiates with government</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td>C leadership</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R08</strong></td><td>Rising unemployment (8.69% 2025) amplifies anti-immigration sentiment → opposition narrative harder</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td>Opposition communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R09</strong></td><td><strong>S revealed-preference silence on deportation</strong> becomes durable intra-opposition fracture</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>S + V + MP coordination</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>V's universal-rejectionist pattern triggers SD attack-ad cycle — V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R11</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses → forces amendment</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td>Lagrådet (external)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R12</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax cut triggers EU DG CLIMA infringement preliminary (Fit-for-55 / ETS II context)</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R13</strong></td><td>ECtHR Strasbourg pilot-judgment on deportation expansion (3–5 year horizon)</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Government legal review</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R14</strong></td><td>Transport union (Transportarbetareförbundet) publicly splits from S on fuel-tax cut → damages S working-class brand</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>S + LO dialogue</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R15</strong></td><td>No 175+ post-2026 majority; minority-government instability; snap election 2027–2028</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>All parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The government's three-proposition immigration package (prop. 2025/26:229, 235, 215) will pass with M/SD/KD/L majority. The opposition's 10 counter-motions, while democratically essential, will all fail. This creates a <strong>polarisation lock-in</strong>: the government campaigns on "we secured the borders" while opposition campaigns on "we defended human rights" — both narratives are true and irreconcilable. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (World Bank data), voter anxiety about resource competition makes the government's framing electorally stronger.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2649,7 +2649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Pol
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Materialisation timeline</strong>: SfU → May 2026; Chamber → June 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition strategic response <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: S's pivot to "integration investment" narrative (HD024079) frames integration as economic productivity, not welfare spending. Combine with comparative-international evidence (private-operator clauses outlier even in Nordic context) to shift frame from "border security" to "welfare-state defence".</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Economic context</strong>: Sweden's unemployment rose from 8.4% (2024) to 8.69% (2025) while GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (after –0.2% in 2023). Economic fragility makes voters more receptive to government arguments about limiting immigration-related public expenditure.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2660,8 +2660,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 —
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Q1 2026 LFS results (expected May 2026) will either strengthen or weaken this risk.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Post-adoption, prop. 2025/26:229's private-operator clauses face challenge at Migrationsdomstolen on EU Pact Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 grounds; ultimate ECtHR referral possible within 36 months.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Full elimination requires either government removing private-operator clauses (no political path) or opposition pre-emptively building litigation record — MP's HD024087 is that record.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: MP's HD024087 text explicitly invokes EU Pact — usable as precedent for NGO amicus briefs.</p>
@@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-La
 <li>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar → L ↑ to 4</li>
 <li>Government amends to remove private-operator clauses → L ↓ to 1</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Specific risk</strong>: The extra budget cuts fuel taxes, directly benefiting rural households with longer commutes. S's HD024082 opposing the cut may be read in rural constituencies as "S doesn't care about our fuel costs." S lost Norrland ground in 2022.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination not feasible (S cannot reverse HD024082 filing); reduction requires rural-counter-offer communications strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Ris
 <li>Rural S MPs issue coordinated statement on HD024082 intent → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Major fuel-price spike (OPEC / geopolitical) during campaign → L ↑ to 5</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategic significance</strong>: C's HD024095 on deportation is distinctively moderate — demands proportionality test (systematic repeated offenses). Positions C as potential negotiating partner with government on immigration. If C negotiates, it breaks the four-party opposition front.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. C's negotiation posture is a feature of its political positioning, not elimination-target for opposition. Mitigation is about <strong>channelling</strong> rather than suppressing C.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a
 <li>Paarup-Petersen rejects amendment talks → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Lagrådet cites proportionality test → L ↑ to 5 (government forced to negotiate)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: S filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235 despite filing on reception (HD024080), housing (HD024079), and fuel tax (HD024082). Signals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party. Reveals that "opposition unity" is selective.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination requires S to file on follow-on deportation legislation in 2026–2027. Monitoring is primary mitigation.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals</strong>:</p>
@@ -2710,11 +2710,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on D
 <li>S leadership public statement on deportation proportionality → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>S silence extends through election campaign → L ↑ to 4</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Lagrådet explicitly critiques private-operator clauses; government forced to amend. High-impact but uncertain-likelihood.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE via opposition monitoring and pre-amplification of Lagrådet language in press.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     R01[R01 Polarisation Lock-In&#x3C;br/>L×I=25]
     R08[R08 Unemployment Context&#x3C;br/>L×I=16]
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a
 <p><strong>Cascade reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: R01 (polarisation lock-in) is the <strong>central node</strong> — 6 other risks feed into it. R08 (unemployment) is the <strong>amplification multiplier</strong>. Opposition mitigation should therefore prioritise R08 (labour-market narrative) and R10 (V rejectionism) as the two highest-leverage input nodes.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-visualisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-visualisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Opposition Motions (April 2026)
     x-axis "Low Likelihood" --> "High Likelihood"
@@ -2786,7 +2786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "R13 ECtHR Pilot": [0.28, 0.90]
     "R15 Minority Gov": [0.18, 0.92]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2884,7 +2884,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk I
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SfU committee scheduling of immigration propositions</td><td>Committee dates announced</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R01, R07, R09</td></tr><tr><td>C leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td>Media appearance</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB)</td><td>Monthly release</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R08</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Sweden deportation case rulings</td><td>Any ruling</td><td>Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>R02, R13</td></tr><tr><td>SVT Novus polls on immigration #1 salience</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>FiU committee vote on extra budget</td><td>Committee vote</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R03, R12, R14</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R11, R02</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Transport union public statement</td><td>Press release</td><td>≤ 21 days</td><td>R14</td></tr><tr><td>Saab/BAE quarterly earnings commentary</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R04</td></tr><tr><td>S follow-on motion on 2026-2027 deportation legislation</td><td>Motion filing</td><td>2026-2027</td><td>R09</td></tr><tr><td>Novus migration-salience tracking</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>R12</td></tr><tr><td>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar on 2025/26:229</td><td>Position paper</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>R02, R11</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current coalition stability <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: STABLE (M/SD/KD/L intact)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All immigration propositions will pass as planned</li>
@@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<
 <li>Campaign-narrative lock-in requires sustained media and polling discipline through summer 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — Bayesian scenario weighting + risk activation per scenario</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team critique adjusts R01 consequence magnitude</li>
@@ -2919,7 +2919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2955,7 +2955,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:04 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>Political SWOT v2.2 + <strong>TOWS interference matrix</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Coverage</strong></td><td>All 8 mandatory groups + 4-cluster drill-down</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition counter-strategy against the government's spring legislative package. Analysis below covers:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level SWOT</strong> for the LEAD immigration cluster (primary focus)</li>
@@ -2964,8 +2964,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framew
 <li>All 8 mandatory stakeholder groups</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S1</strong></td><td>Quadruple-party coordination on New Reception Law signals disciplined opposition front</td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C) — all within 72 h of prop. 2025/26:229</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S2</strong></td><td>S's counter-motion on reception law targets private-sector asylum housing — protects vulnerable people and creates positive electoral narrative</td><td>HD024080: "asylboenden ska inte kunna överlåtas i privat drift" — clear anti-privatization platform</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S3</strong></td><td>C takes moderate position on deportation — requires proportionality (systematic repeated offenses) — converges with European statutory mainstream</td><td>HD024095 — aligned with Germany AufenthG §53, Netherlands "glijdende schaal", Denmark Udlændingeloven §26</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S4</strong></td><td>MP's comprehensive rejection of deportation law challenges constitutional proportionality principle; ECHR Art. 8 alignment</td><td>HD024097 — preserves partial law (8 kap. 1-3 §) while rejecting coercive expansion</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S5</strong></td><td>V's total-rejection strategy provides left-flank anchor for opposition messaging</td><td>HD024090 — outright rejection of entire prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S6</strong></td><td>S's challenge to time-limited immigrant housing frames integration as economic investment, not welfare</td><td>HD024079 — Ardalan Shekarabi requests government return with new housing proposals</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S7</strong></td><td>MP's EU Pact compatibility frame (HD024087) gives cluster international-legitimacy authority</td><td>HD024087 cites EU Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 material-conditions standard</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S8</strong></td><td>Division-of-labour frames cover all major voter segments (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric-axis analysis across HD024076/80/87/89</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>W1</strong></td><td>S's positions on immigration are internally contradictory — party supported stricter policies 2022–2024, now opposes them</td><td>S filed HD024080 but governed with stricter policy 2014-2022</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W2</strong></td><td>Four-party coordination masks substantive incompatibility — V's rejection (HD024090) and C's amendment (HD024095) cannot co-govern</td><td>Motion-text comparison V vs C on same proposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W3</strong></td><td>V and MP arms-export motions put them at odds with post-NATO consensus</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58/32/10 SOM arms-export support (2025)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W4</strong></td><td>MP's across-the-board rejection strategy (4 total rejections) risks being seen as obstructionist</td><td>HD024087, HD024097, HD024096, HD024098 — all outright rejections</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) reveals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for centre-left</td><td>S filed no motion on prop. 2025/26:235; filed on every other cluster</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W6</strong></td><td>No joint press conference or coalition statement; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W7</strong></td><td>V's consistent-rejection pattern across immigration + arms creates "universal rejectionist" frame vulnerability</td><td>HD024076 + HD024090 + HD024091 all rejection-structured</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3186,7 +3186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by Thes
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>O1</strong></td><td>Immigration becomes defining election issue — opposition can build 2026 campaign around "humane alternative"</td><td>10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O2</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) gives S+MP ownership of climate narrative</td><td>Sweden GDP 0.82% 2024, unemployment 8.69% 2025 — economic alternative story</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O3</strong></td><td>Healthcare motions (HD024081/83/94) create unusual S+V+C coalition signalling post-2026 cooperation potential</td><td>Three ideologically diverse parties on healthcare governance</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O4</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen report on Sida enables MP+C to demand accountability on government aid effectiveness</td><td>HD024072/70 — adds "good governance" credibility</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O5</strong></td><td>C's proportionality frame on deportation may attract L backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L rule-of-law sensitivity + comparative statutory-test alignment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O6</strong></td><td>Post-adoption ECtHR litigation on deportation creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Swedish ECHR adverse-judgment track record</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O7</strong></td><td>MP's end-user review language on arms (HD024096) aligns with Norwegian/Dutch/German practice — standard-setting</td><td>Comparative analysis §4</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3258,9 +3258,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td>Government M/SD/KD/L majority will pass all four propositions; opposition risks credibility</td><td>prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236/228 all have coalition support</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td>S's opposition to fuel-tax cut may alienate working-class rural voters who benefit</td><td>HD024082 vs Norrland S vote 2022 baseline</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td>Arms-export opposition (V+MP) conflicts with Swedish post-NATO security doctrine</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58% public support continued exports</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td>Coordinated opposition risks being framed as "obstructionism" on security-critical reforms</td><td>Simultaneous rejection on deportation/reception/housing/arms</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's consistent-rejection pattern as "defends criminals / unreliable on Ukraine"</td><td>V's HD024090 + HD024091 joint attack surface</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td>62% voter support for stricter immigration sets a polling floor opposition cannot breach</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 migration salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td>Extra-budget fast-track procedure on fuel tax compresses opposition narrative-building window to ≤ 4 weeks</td><td>FiU extra-budget timetable</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h3>
 <p>The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves. Below: the <strong>≥3-entry interference cells</strong> with strategic impact on the April 2026 opposition campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opport
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO1</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>Sustain coordinated-opposition narrative through summer</strong> with sequential follow-on motions and media events designed to prevent government from reclaiming the agenda</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO2</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C moderate/statutory) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Target L MPs</strong> (Johan Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) via C's amendment frame; L's historical rule-of-law sensitivity + statutory-test comparative alignment creates narrow negotiation window</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × O2 (climate narrative)</strong></td><td><strong>Link housing-privatisation to fuel-tax private-benefit</strong> as "government prioritises private interests over public goods" unified frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO4</strong></td><td><strong>S7 (MP EU Pact compatibility) × O6 (ECtHR litigation)</strong></td><td><strong>Pre-stage EU Commission remissvar + Strasbourg litigation path</strong>; MP's HD024087 text is usable as precedent for post-adoption legal challenge</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST1</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C proportionality, European mainstream) × T4 (obstructionism frame)</strong></td><td><strong>Publish comparative-international analysis</strong> showing C's amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark — neutralises obstructionism charge</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST2</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × T1 (government majority passes)</strong></td><td><strong>Coordinate SfU vote sequencing</strong> — amendment first, then rejection — to prevent "disarray" framing at chamber vote</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × T2 (rural-voter alienation)</strong></td><td><strong>Front Norrland-anchored S MPs</strong> (Joakim Järrebring, Fredrik Lundh Sammeli) in media appearances on welfare-state framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3346,7 +3346,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weakness
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO1</strong></td><td><strong>W1 (S 2015–2022 legacy) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>S must own the 2015 pivot publicly</strong> — frame HD024080 as "learning from experience" to neutralise legacy-credibility gap</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO2</strong></td><td><strong>W5 (S-silence on deportation) × O3 (S+V+C healthcare coalition)</strong></td><td><strong>S should use healthcare coalition as broader S+V+C rehearsal template</strong>; deportation-silence fragments the left only if not compensated by other coordination evidence</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO3</strong></td><td><strong>W2 (V–C incompatibility) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Stage-manage SfU voting</strong>: C's amendment goes first; if passed, C-V-MP-S-L vote together on amended law; if failed, they unify on rejection. Avoid simultaneous V-reject + C-amend vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3387,25 +3387,25 @@ <h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weak
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>WT1</strong> (V universal rejectionism × SD attack ads) and <strong>WT2</strong> (V–C incompatibility × government majority) are the <strong>two critical vulnerabilities</strong> that could collapse the cluster's campaign value. <strong>WO3</strong> is the essential mitigation: disciplined SfU vote sequencing.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish citizens experience immigration policy directly through social services, housing markets, and labour competition. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (up from 8.4% in 2024), citizens in lower-income brackets are receptive to government arguments about limiting new arrivals. However, <strong>S's HD024080</strong> appeals to citizens concerned about privatisation of asylum services — a proxy for welfare-state protection values that resonate with S's base. The fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) speaks directly to household budgets but risks appearing out-of-touch with rural drivers. A <strong>divided citizenry</strong> is the realistic baseline — the opposition's job is to move ~3-5% swing voters, not to flip majority opinion. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>The governing coalition views these counter-motions as expected partisan opposition. For <strong>Tidö-agreement</strong> parties, the immigration cluster validates their legislative agenda. The sheer number of counter-motions (10/21 on immigration) <strong>confirms the opposition's strategy</strong> and allows the government to campaign on "defending Sweden's security" against a unified left-green-centre bloc. <strong>L is the weak link</strong>: Johan Pehrson's historical rule-of-law sensitivity and the comparative evidence backing C's HD024095 proportionality test create a narrow fault line. The fuel-tax counter-motions create a secondary vulnerability — the government must justify why a climate-ambivalent tax cut is in Sweden's interest. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>This batch represents the most coordinated opposition filing in the current riksmöte. <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> under party leader Magdalena Andersson is pursuing a "responsible opposition" strategy — accepting some security reforms while drawing clear lines on welfare-state privatisation (HD024080) and integration investment (HD024079). The <strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> is strategic, not accidental. <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong> under Nooshi Dadgostar maintains a principled rejection stance on all immigration tightening but risks the universal-rejectionist framing. <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong> under Janine Alm Ericson leads on climate issues (HD024098) and humanitarian concerns. <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> occupies the critical swing position — accepting some deportation reform but demanding proportionality (HD024095); C is the most politically interesting actor in this wave because its amendment posture is the bridge between opposition messaging and European mainstream practice. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish industry faces contradictory pressures. The fuel-tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) benefits transport-dependent industries — making S's HD024082 unpopular with business. However, the time-limited housing law (prop. 2025/26:215) addresses industry's need for a stable, integratable workforce — V's HD024077 argues the housing limitation reduces integration success, which over time damages labour supply. Consumer-credit reform (HD024088, C) affects the financial services sector directly. <strong>Defence industry</strong> (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Karlskoga ~8k jobs) opposes V's HD024091 and will quietly lobby committee MPs. <strong>Transport-sector unions</strong> may publicly split from S on HD024082 — a risk S must pre-empt. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>NGOs, church organisations, and refugee-advocacy groups are the strongest supporters of all opposition immigration motions. <strong>Röda Korset</strong>, <strong>Rädda Barnen</strong>, and <strong>Caritas Sverige</strong> have publicly opposed prop. 2025/26:229. Civil-society concerns centre on: (1) private-sector asylum housing (S's HD024080), (2) proportionality in deportation (C's HD024095 / MP's HD024097), and (3) integration investment (S's HD024079). Crime-victim organisations have mixed views on HD024078/84/85 — parent-liability provisions in the crime-victim law create tension with child-protection principles. <strong>Svenska Freds, Diakonia, Amnesty Sverige</strong> form a durable pro-opposition coalition on arms-export motions. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's immigration policy reforms must remain compatible with the <strong>EU Pact on Migration and Asylum</strong> (entered force 2024, phased implementation 2025–2027). <strong>MP's HD024087</strong> explicitly argues the new reception law risks non-compliance with Reg. 2024/1348 Article 17 material-conditions standard. The arms-export motions (HD024091/96) create international friction — <strong>Sweden's NATO partners</strong> (UK, Germany, US) expect continued defence-industry cooperation post-NATO accession. <strong>EU DG CLIMA</strong> is monitoring Swedish fuel-tax policy under Fit-for-55 and ETS II (entering 2027). <strong>ECtHR</strong> remains a durable post-adoption challenge venue on deportation (prop. 2025/26:235). <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Legal scholars have flagged proportionality concerns in prop. 2025/26:235. <strong>C's HD024095</strong> reflects this — requiring "systematic repeated offenses over time" for deportation aligns with European Court of Human Rights proportionality doctrine and converges with Germany/Netherlands/Denmark/Switzerland statutory practice. <strong>V's total rejection (HD024090)</strong> goes further, arguing the entire law conflicts with ECHR Article 8 (family life). <strong>Lagrådet yttrande</strong> on prop. 2025/26:229 and 2025/26:235 is the single most consequential pending signal — expected Q2 2026. Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) has not published a formal opinion. Administrative Courts (Migrationsdomstolen) will become the main post-adoption venue. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish media (SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD) will cover the coordinated opposition filing as a major political story. Public polling (Novus Q1 2026) shows immigration as the #1 political concern for Swedish voters in 2025–2026. The "four parties against one law" narrative is highly newsworthy. The fuel-tax story plays differently: tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) will frame it as "opposition opposes affordable fuel" — a potential negative story for S. Regional/local media (Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT) will cover the Norrland angle on fuel tax. Young-voter media (TikTok, Instagram) favours MP's climate frame. <strong>Press editorial lines</strong> will be split: DN/SvD lean cautiously pro-government; Aftonbladet/ETC lean pro-opposition; Expressen variable. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Immigration["🏛️ Immigration Policy Cluster (10 motions · LEAD)"]
         P229["prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law"]
@@ -3457,7 +3457,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordinatio
     style P228 fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style P216 fill:#17a2b8,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — LEAD finding + ACH + Red-Team</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — LEAD cluster SWOT</li>
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3510,7 +3510,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:06 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td>🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (democratic process functioning normally; specific strategic threats identified)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frameworks</strong></td><td>Threat taxonomy + <strong>Attack-tree</strong> (opposition) + <strong>Kill-chain</strong> (government counter-strategy) + <strong>Diamond Model</strong> (disinformation) + <strong>STRIDE-adapted</strong> (political-process integrity)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or security threat — it constitutes <strong>healthy democratic opposition exercising accountability functions</strong>. The threat dimensions below are <strong>strategic threats to narrative control</strong> (who wins the 2026 campaign), <strong>governance threats to policy coherence</strong> (climate-fiscal contradiction), and <strong>institutional-integrity threats</strong> (disinformation, coordinated inauthentic behaviour around immigration narratives).</p>
 <p><strong>Six substantive threat lines</strong> merit monitoring, mapped across four complementary frameworks:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -3522,7 +3522,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>T6 NEW: Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour</strong> [MEDIUM] — narrative-integrity threat from domestic-foreign influence actors exploiting immigration salience</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 2026 Threat Analysis] --> B[Democratic Process]
     A --> C[Policy Coherence]
@@ -3556,8 +3556,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="t
     style F1 fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style F2 fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration propositions simultaneously risks <strong>locking in a binary political cleavage</strong> that dominates 2026 election discourse to the exclusion of other policy areas. When all major opposition parties align on a single policy dimension:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Simplifies electoral choice in ways that may not reflect voter complexity</li>
@@ -3566,16 +3566,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: 10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration — no other policy area comes close. The concentration signals that the opposition has calculated immigration is their highest-return electoral investment.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — electoral dynamics are inherently uncertain; the threat materialises only if the opposition successfully executes its framing strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), yet the government's prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes in a supplementary budget — a move that adds <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> (Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling) at a time when Sweden is ~20% behind its 2030 trajectory under Klimatlagen 2017:720. S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) both challenge this with different framings but reach the same conclusion: the fuel-tax cut is bad policy.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this is a governance threat</strong>: If the government passes a climate-inconsistent budget measure while claiming climate leadership, it creates a credibility gap that international partners (EU Commission DG CLIMA, climate-finance investors) may exploit. S's demand that the government "return with a new proposal" is procedurally responsible.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative evidence</strong>: Only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt) is a direct precedent; Germany did not extend. Sweden is betting against European experience.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — the climate-fiscal contradiction is factual and measurable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-export ban including follow-up deliveries) signal that a future left-green government would reverse Sweden's post-NATO defence-industrial policy. This creates <strong>policy uncertainty risk</strong> for defence-industry investment decisions. Swedish arms manufacturers (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Systems Karlskoga ~8k jobs) need long-term policy certainty that their export licences will be maintained.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Both motions challenge prop. 2025/26:228. V's motion explicitly rejects the proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports to human-rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — V and MP are currently in opposition with no pathway to government without S.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Immigration-salience political moments in Sweden 2018, 2022, and now 2026 have correlated with <strong>foreign state-linked amplification networks</strong> (documented by MSB and FOI) and <strong>domestic anonymous influence operations</strong> on social platforms. The April 2026 opposition-motion wave provides a high-value target for:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Foreign influence operations</strong> (Russian-linked and Chinese-linked networks per FOI 2024 assessment) amplifying polarising framings</li>
@@ -3627,7 +3627,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium
 <li>Foreign-language amplification of Swedish political debate (Russian, Arabic, English)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h3>
 <p>Modelled from <strong>government-perspective</strong>: how might the government/SD dismantle the opposition's four-party narrative?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Break 4-party opposition narrative&#x3C;br/>before 2026 election"]
@@ -3688,7 +3688,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">
 <p><strong>Highest-feasibility attack vectors</strong> (dark orange): <strong>A1</strong> (V-C split), <strong>A2</strong> (S-silence exploit), <strong>C1</strong> (V rejectionism attack ads), <strong>D1-D3</strong> (party-specific discrediting). <strong>Opposition mitigation priorities</strong> map directly to SWOT TOWS WT1-WT3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h3>
 <p>Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-communications counter-operation:</p>
 
 
@@ -3737,7 +3737,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kil
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Stage</th><th>Government counter-step</th><th>Opposition counter-counter</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1 Reconnaissance</td><td>SD+M opposition-research team analyses V's HD024076/90/91 for rejectionism patterns</td><td>V pre-audits own filing texts for rejection-framing bias</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2 Weaponisation</td><td>SD ad agency produces attack ads: "V abandons Ukraine" (linking HD024091 to Ukraine-support narrative)</td><td>V issues pre-emptive Ukraine-support statement pairing each arms motion</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3 Delivery</td><td>Ads on YouTube, TikTok, Facebook + front-page placement Expressen</td><td>Opposition paid-media counter on same platforms</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4 Exploitation</td><td>Ads exploit cost-of-living anxiety (74% priority — Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Opposition pivots to integration-as-economic-productivity frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5 Installation</td><td>Frame installed via repeated broadcast → "opposition = chaos"</td><td>Opposition produces positive vision: cross-party amendment on HD024095</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6 Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Tidö-coalition daily message discipline enforcing frame</td><td>Opposition four-leader coordinated op-eds (without joint photo)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7 Actions on Objectives</td><td>Polling moves 1–2 points toward M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Mid-campaign frame-shift to climate or healthcare (where opposition wins)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
 <p>Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:</p>
 
 
@@ -3788,7 +3788,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th>Translation to political context</th><th>Manifestation in April 2026 cluster</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Fake actors impersonating politicians / parties</td><td>Deepfake videos of S / V / MP / C leaders pro/anti positions</td><td>Platform verification; rapid-response units</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Altering policy texts or records</td><td>Fake versions of motion texts circulated on social media</td><td>Riksdagen authoritative-text portal; press fact-checking</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Actors denying statements later</td><td>Party leaders claiming "that's not what our motion says"</td><td>Timestamped primary sources; dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation disclosure</td><td>Private-data leaks around politicians</td><td>Hacked constituency data used to target voters</td><td>Cybersecurity; MFA; GDPR enforcement</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of service</td><td>Suppressing legitimate speech</td><td>Spam flooding of comment sections; fake reports to deplatform opponents</td><td>Platform-policy transparency; legal recourse</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of privilege</td><td>Foreign actors posing as Swedish voters</td><td>Foreign-language amplification networks</td><td>MSB/FOI monitoring; platform CIB removal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-level-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3846,7 +3846,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Level</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Framework</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1 Immigration polarisation</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2026 election</td><td>Taxonomy + kill-chain</td></tr><tr><td>T2 Climate-fiscal contradiction</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Immediate</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T3 Arms-export policy uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Post-2026</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T4 Deportation proportionality</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>ECHR review</td></tr><tr><td>T5 Democratic-deficit perception</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T6 Disinformation / CIB</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Immediate–September</td><td>Diamond + STRIDE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: 🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Healthy democratic process with identifiable strategic threats, primarily in the <strong>narrative-capture</strong> and <strong>information-integrity</strong> domains rather than <strong>constitutional / rule-of-law</strong> domains.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3908,7 +3908,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Action</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th>Addressed-to</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Pre-stage V Ukraine-support statement template paired with arms-export motions</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Coordinate SfU amendment-first vote sequencing (mitigates A1 attack)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S+V+MP+C whips</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Issue comparative-international evidence briefing to newsrooms (mitigates C2 obstructionism frame)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Opposition press shops</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Monitor MSB/FOI CIB reports; rapid-response to amplification spikes</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All opposition parties</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Prepare rural S MP media schedule (mitigates D1 + R03)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S Norrland delegation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Pre-audit motion texts for deepfake/rumour pre-emption (STRIDE S/T)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>All four opposition press offices</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Document Lagrådet yttrande preparation; pre-brief journalists</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition legal advisors</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>Establish 24h joint-response rotation for attack-ad counters</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition communications coalition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team + ACH ties directly to T1</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — R10 (V rejectionist) ↔ T1/A1/C1</li>
@@ -3921,7 +3921,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-arms-export-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3969,7 +3969,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>ARMS-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024091 (V), HD024096 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:228 — <em>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>Both 2026-04-16 (same-day dual filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>7.5/10 (minority-bloc opposition on post-NATO defence policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>7.50</strong> (×1.00 — foreign-policy dimension neutral weighting)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral foreign policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🔶 <strong>TERTIARY</strong> story with long-horizon significance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024, ending 200+ years of formal military non-alignment (<em>alliansfriheten</em>). Prop. 2025/26:228 modernises the arms-export legal framework (<em>lag om krigsmateriel</em> + <em>lag om vissa produkter som kan användas för dödsstraff eller tortyr</em>) to align Swedish defence-industrial practice with its new alliance obligations and the post-Ukraine-invasion European armaments market reality.</p>
 <p>The V (HD024091) and MP (HD024096) counter-motions are important <strong>not because they will alter the outcome</strong> — the M/SD/KD/L coalition has a secure majority on foreign-policy questions, and the opposition is split with S absent — but because they are <strong>post-NATO reference points</strong>. They establish, publicly and on the parliamentary record, what a future V/MP/(potential S)-led government would do differently.</p>
 <p>This matters for three audiences:</p>
@@ -3982,7 +3982,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The cluster is a <strong>low-probability, high-consequence signalling event</strong>. With no S and only V+MP filing, it lacks electoral consequence in 2026. But it sets the <strong>baseline parameters of the post-2026 defence-policy debate</strong>. If any government-formation scenario includes V or MP (even as a confidence-and-supply partner), the positions in HD024091 and HD024096 become immediate negotiation constraints.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4012,7 +4012,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Position</th><th>Electoral message</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024091</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Håkan Svenneling</td><td><strong>Complete rejection</strong> of the proposition; preserve pre-existing restrictive regime</td><td>"We do not profit from other people's wars"</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Jacob Risberg</td><td><strong>Conditional acceptance</strong> — ban exports to human-rights-violator states; require follow-up-delivery review</td><td>"Defence yes; profit from oppression no"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Divergence analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: V and MP have historically both opposed arms-export liberalisation but with different intensities. This filing confirms a <strong>persistent 2022 → 2026 ideological gap</strong> between them on defence: V is pacifist-adjacent; MP is "ethical defence" — accepting defence industry but with strict end-user controls. Post-NATO, MP's position is more politically viable; V's position is more electorally costly in the current security environment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4059,7 +4059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession
 <p><strong>Insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Post-NATO context makes this <strong>the weakest cluster</strong> in the April 2026 opposition-motions wave. V and MP are filing for <strong>ideological consistency</strong> rather than electoral leverage. Analysts should weight the motions as <strong>signalling, not policy-influencing</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4137,7 +4137,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Ideological consistency: V and MP have opposed arms-export liberalisation since the 1990s; credible filing</td><td>V 1994–2026 positions; MP 1991–2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's conditional frame (HD024096) is aligned with EU Common Position 2008/944/CFSP criteria 2 (human rights)</td><td>EU Common Position text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — Human-rights NGO support (Amnesty, Svenska Freds, Diakonia) is durable and organised</td><td>NGO historical pattern</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is absent — cannot form majority government opposition with only V+MP</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:228</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024091) is inconsistent with Sweden's Ukraine-support consensus (cross-party ~95%)</td><td>Ukraine lethal aid packages 2022-2025, all-party vote</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — Defence-industrial geographic concentration (Linköping/Saab, Karlskoga/BAE) means local S MPs face job-protection pressure</td><td>Constituency employment data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — Issue has fallen off top-10 voter priorities post-Ukraine invasion</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 issue salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Any future human-rights scandal involving Swedish platform in a recipient country (e.g., Saudi export controversy template) would vindicate MP's frame</td><td>Historical Saudi Arabia controversy</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — MP's end-user review demand could become standard-setting for European export-control modernisation</td><td>EU Common Position review cycle</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Defence-industry excess profits (Saab 22% margin 2024) could fuel populist "war profiteers" frame</td><td>Saab Q4 2024 earnings</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government narrative: "V+MP are unreliable NATO partners" for post-2026 negotiations</td><td>SD and M messaging template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Ukraine allied-support frame ("we help Ukraine by maintaining exports") is electorally dominant</td><td>Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Defence-industry layoff threats (implicit or explicit) during amendment negotiation</td><td>Saab/BAE historical lobbying</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4172,7 +4172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — Th
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cluster's weakness is overwhelming — the <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference (S-absence + NATO-unreliability frame) defines the cluster as a non-decisive signalling event. The interpretive frontier is whether MP's end-user review language (HD024096) gets absorbed into the final UU committee report as a dissenting minority position — that would be the cluster's <strong>only</strong> concrete policy achievement.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6.
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: MP's HD024096 "end-user review" demand is <strong>not an ideological outlier</strong> — it would move Sweden closer to Norway, Netherlands, and post-2024 Germany. Analysts should not report this as a fringe position; it is a mainstream Northern European stance.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4308,7 +4308,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AR1</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 passes without MP's end-user review language incorporated</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>UU minority reservation formalises V/MP position</td><td>UU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>AR2</td><td>Swedish arms used in future recipient-country human-rights incident; vindication for MP frame but reputational damage for Sweden</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Pre-emptive stricter end-user review</td><td>3–7 year horizon</td></tr><tr><td>AR3</td><td>V's total-rejection stance cited by SD as proof V "would abandon Ukraine"</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>V clarifies explicit Ukraine-support carveout</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>AR4</td><td>Defence-industry concentrated-layoff threats influence UU committee negotiations</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td>UU rapporteur independence; media transparency</td><td>UU negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>AR5</td><td>EU Common Position review (2027) adopts language closer to MP's position; Sweden needs to amend retroactively</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP's parliamentary record is usable precedent</td><td>2027+</td></tr><tr><td>AR6</td><td>Post-2026 coalition scenario requires V or MP support; HD024091/96 become negotiation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>Map of alternative coalition configurations</td><td>Post-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4352,7 +4352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>UU rapporteur selection and draft report</strong></td><td>Any inclusion of end-user review language</td><td>May 2026</td><td>AR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab / BAE quarterly earnings</strong></td><td>Public commentary on political risk</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>AR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Svenska Freds annual export analysis</strong></td><td>Data-driven NGO critique</td><td>Annual</td><td>AR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Common Position review</strong></td><td>Brussels-level policy changes</td><td>2027</td><td>AR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Post-election government-formation negotiations</strong></td><td>V/MP coalition conditions if applicable</td><td>Sep–Nov 2026</td><td>AR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         V["V · Håkan Svenneling&#x3C;br/>HD024091&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -4408,7 +4408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
     style Ukraine fill:#ffd700,color:#000
     style NATO_SEC fill:#003399,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 will pass with both motions defeated</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Coalition majority in UU; S non-filing removes only credible threat</td></tr><tr><td>MP's end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Comparative table §6</td></tr><tr><td>V's total rejection vs Ukraine-support coherence gap damages V's electoral standing by 0.5-1%</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Novus polling + Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td></tr><tr><td>Defence industry will publicly intervene in committee process</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Sweden's industry lobbying is usually quiet</td></tr><tr><td>Post-2026 V/MP coalition role includes defence-export renegotiation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Depends on election outcome (P ≈ 0.35 for any V/MP influence)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 5 (defence-policy signalling)</li>
 <li><strong>Threat analysis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>../threat-analysis.md</code></a> T3 (arms export opposition)</li>
@@ -4463,7 +4463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deportation-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>DEPORT-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:235 — <em>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>All 2026-04-16 (same-day triple filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>9/10 (triple-party opposition, constitutional proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.80</strong> (9.0 ×0.98 — electoral-definitional axis per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (P1 policy with ECHR/proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead framing</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h3>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:235 expands the grounds on which non-citizens can be deported following a criminal conviction. It lowers the severity threshold, extends to categories of offence previously requiring repeat conviction, and shortens the procedural window for appeal. The government presents it as a <strong>flagship gäng-kriminalitet response</strong> — a direct continuation of the 2023–2025 organised-crime legislative arc.</p>
 <p>What makes this cluster analytically distinct from the reception-law cluster is that <strong>the three filed counter-motions occupy visibly different positions on the same proportionality axis</strong>, rather than agreeing on one frame. This is not a coordination failure — it is a <strong>deliberate triangulation</strong>, and it demonstrates more sophisticated parliamentary technique than the unified reception-law front:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -4528,7 +4528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This C
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Where the reception-law cluster is a <em>political</em> coordination achievement, the deportation cluster is a <em>legal-rhetorical</em> coordination achievement. The three frames map onto three possible judicial outcomes. This gives opposition parties a durable talking-points inventory for the full litigation lifecycle, not just the 2026 campaign cycle.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4569,7 +4569,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Th
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Legal position</th><th align="center">ECHR alignment</th><th>Post-adoption litigation value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024090</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>Total rejection; law violates equal-protection principle</td><td align="center">Indirect (Art. 14)</td><td>Low — courts cannot strike down statute</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024095</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>Conditional — require "systematic repeated offences over time"</td><td align="center">Direct (Art. 8 proportionality)</td><td><strong>High</strong> — provides appeal template</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024097</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>Partial rejection — preserve 8 kap. 1–3 §; reject coercive expansion</td><td align="center">Indirect (procedural due process)</td><td>Medium — targets specific provisions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Triangulation analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The three motions can be read as a Russian-doll hierarchy of demands. If the government refuses all three, V's position is vindicated as "you see, nothing satisfies them"; if the government accepts C's proportionality test, MP's preservation is automatically satisfied; V loses electorally but gains legally. This structure means the opposition <strong>cannot lose everything</strong> from the filing — at minimum, it has established an evidentiary record for post-adoption challenges.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4647,7 +4647,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aw
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Triangulated frames survive hostile selective reporting; each paper can find a frame that suits its editorial line</td><td>HD024090 (DN), HD024095 (Expressen), HD024097 (Svenska Dagbladet)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — C's HD024095 aligns with Lagrådet's historical proportionality concerns on similar statutes</td><td>C's motion cites 8 kap. 1 § wording with proportionality test</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — MP's preservation logic (HD024097) is the most legally conservative — difficult to attack as obstructionist</td><td>MP explicitly preserves 8 kap. 1-3 §</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024090) anchors the cluster against any government "we met them halfway" framing</td><td>V's rejection text cites ECHR Art. 14 indirectly</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is notably absent from this cluster (filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235)</td><td>Compare: S filed on reception, housing, fuel tax, healthcare — not deportation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on deportation of convicted foreigners runs 70%+ in favour (SOM-institutet 2025)</td><td>SOM-institutet 2025 data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — SD campaign will cherry-pick V's HD024090 "Sweden should not deport criminals" framing</td><td>SD 2022 campaign template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Post-adoption ECHR litigation in Strasbourg creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Pending Sweden ECHR cases backlog</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — C's proportionality frame may attract Liberal (L) backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L historical position on rule-of-law issues</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Lagrådet yttrande may cite C's HD024095 language; elevates it from partisan motion to quasi-consensus</td><td>Lagrådet historically cites committee opposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — S's silence will be framed by opposition-internal critics as "S is too close to government on deportation" — fractures left</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Government argument that deportation is gäng-criminalitet response is electorally dominant (58% support, Novus)</td><td>Novus 2026-Q1 crime salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Administrative Court backlogs mean post-adoption challenges resolve only in 2027–2028</td><td>Sweden admin-court stats</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4682,7 +4682,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference —
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The "S silence" is the <strong>single most revealing signal</strong> in the motions cluster. S has prioritised welfare-state defence over legal-proportionality defence. This is a <strong>strategic choice</strong> that reveals S's 2026 campaign architecture: S intends to own the <em>economic</em> immigration narrative (integration, housing, anti-privatisation) while avoiding the <em>security</em> immigration narrative (deportation, border enforcement). Opposition-bloc analysts should note that this means S is not a reliable partner for ECHR-based challenges post-adoption.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article 8 (family life) because deportation for criminal conduct has been repeatedly upheld by the European Court of Human Rights when:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>The conduct is of sufficient gravity</li>
@@ -4740,7 +4740,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Nordic and continental trend is <strong>towards</strong> statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 is therefore <strong>not a leftist/liberal outlier</strong> — it is a convergence move toward European best practice. Framing it as such in newsroom coverage would materially change the political economy of the motion.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4811,7 +4811,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DR1</td><td>Government rejects all three motions; law passes with expanded triggers; Sweden faces ECHR Strasbourg case within 36 months</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Litigation-ready record already in HD024097</td><td>Post-adoption Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR2</td><td>S-free zone in this cluster becomes durable opposition fracture — V+MP+C cannot form majority without S</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>Requires S to file a motion on subsequent deportation legislation</td><td>2027 follow-on propositions</td></tr><tr><td>DR3</td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's HD024090 "do not deport criminals" soundbite; V drops 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with crime-victim framing</td><td>Pre-election ad cycle Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR4</td><td>C's HD024095 is co-opted by government to add "systematic" qualifier; proportionality test dilutes in drafting</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C leadership must refuse dilutions; protect statutory test</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>DR5</td><td>Lagrådet explicitly cites C's proportionality frame in its yttrande; government is forced to amend</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr><tr><td>DR6</td><td>ECHR issues pilot-judgment against Sweden for disproportionate deportation practice</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td>None (structural); but massive reputational impact</td><td>3–5 year horizon</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</strong></td><td>Any reference to "proportionalitet" or "systematiska upprepade"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>DR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S follow-on motion</strong></td><td>S files motion on follow-on deportation legislation</td><td>2026–2027</td><td>DR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C leader interview on HD024095</strong></td><td>C party leader / Paarup-Petersen media appearance</td><td>Weekly from April 2026</td><td>DR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD ad campaign</strong></td><td>Content analysis of SD social ads for "V defends criminals" framing</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>DR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Administrative Court case filings</strong></td><td>Volume of deportation-order challenges post-adoption</td><td>Monthly 2027+</td><td>DR1, DR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph A["🏛️ Committee-Level Actors"]
         SfU["SfU rapporteur&#x3C;br/>(M/SD/KD)"]
@@ -4910,7 +4910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Mo
     style LAG fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style ECHR fill:#8e44ad,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4948,7 +4948,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertaint
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Uncertainty</th><th align="right">Current prior</th><th>What would update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Will Lagrådet cite C's proportionality language?</td><td align="right">P = 0.40</td><td>Lagrådet historical pattern on committee motions</td></tr><tr><td>Will an L backbencher defect on HD024095?</td><td align="right">P = 0.15</td><td>Any public L statement on deportation</td></tr><tr><td>Will S file a deportation motion in 2026–2027 follow-on legislation?</td><td align="right">P = 0.55</td><td>S 2026 election platform language on crime</td></tr><tr><td>Will ECHR issue pilot judgment vs Sweden within 5 years?</td><td align="right">P = 0.25</td><td>Admin Court case volume after adoption</td></tr><tr><td>Will C's HD024095 survive SfU negotiation intact?</td><td align="right">P = 0.30</td><td>Rapporteur selection and amendment process</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 2 (triple-pressure immigration)</li>
 <li><strong>Related reception cluster</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>./reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
@@ -4967,7 +4967,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5015,7 +5015,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>FUEL-CLUSTER-2026-04-15-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024098 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:236 — <em>Extra ändringsbudget: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Finansutskottet (FiU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-15 (S) · 2026-04-17 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>8.3/10 (climate-fiscal contradiction)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.20</strong> (8.3 ×0.99 — fiscal/climate axis retains near-full weight; per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥉 <strong>SECONDARY</strong> story with electoral-narrative importance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h3>
 <p>The extra budget (<em>extra ändringsbudget</em>) is a mid-cycle supplementary fiscal instrument. Reducing fuel tax via an extra budget is unusual: extra budgets are traditionally reserved for crisis response (pandemic, war, natural disaster). Using one to cut fuel tax signals that the government either (a) believes current fuel prices are a <strong>genuine household-budget crisis</strong> or (b) is delivering an <strong>election-adjacent pocketbook signal</strong> to rural voters within the legal envelope of extra-budget practice.</p>
 <p>The analytic pivot is this: <strong>the fuel tax cut is the only government-policy item in the April 2026 opposition-motion cluster that the opposition can frame as unambiguously contradicting stated government commitments</strong> — in this case, Sweden's Paris Agreement trajectory and the government's own climate mandate under the 2017 Climate Act.</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5027,7 +5027,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cluster is a <em>second electoral pillar</em> for the opposition, independent of the immigration narrative. Opposition strategists will treat this as the <strong>"climate pillar"</strong> to complement the <strong>"humanitarian pillar"</strong> of the immigration clusters. The cluster's value is therefore not in defeating prop. 2025/26:236 (it will pass) but in <strong>building a durable campaign narrative for September 2026</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5060,7 +5060,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Primary frame</th><th>Secondary frame</th><th>Target voter segment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024082</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Mikael Damberg</td><td>Fiscal responsibility — "ineffective spending; return with better proposal"</td><td>Distributional — "tax cut disproportionately benefits higher incomes with larger vehicles"</td><td>Centre-left; suburban S voters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024098</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Janine Alm Ericson</td><td>Climate coherence — "increases emissions; violates Paris and Climate Act trajectory"</td><td>Intergenerational — "shifts costs to future taxpayers via climate penalty"</td><td>Urban-green MP voters; young voters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Data note <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: An earlier draft of this dossier's <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> listed HD024092 as a third fuel-tax counter-motion. That reference was reconciled against the canonical filing index in <code>classification-results.md</code> and <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> (both of which list only HD024082 and HD024098), and removed. The cluster is definitively two-party (S + MP); arguments in this analysis that depend on cluster size are written to the two-party baseline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5138,7 +5138,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Two complementary frames (fiscal + climate) cover centre-left and green voter bases without competition</td><td>HD024082 (fiscal), HD024098 (climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's climate frame is measurable: the cut adds ≈ 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e annually (Naturvårdsverket modelling)</td><td>Naturvårdsverket fuel-tax elasticity models</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — S's procedural "return with better proposal" framing is defensive — hard to attack as obstructionist</td><td>HD024082 motion text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — Rural voters gain directly from the cut; S's HD024082 risks Norrland vote erosion</td><td>S rural-constituency 2022 results</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on fuel taxes is decisively negative (63% support any cut, Novus 2026-Q1)</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — The cut is time-limited (extra budget framing) — reduces long-term climate-accountability leverage</td><td>Extra-budget procedural design</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's climate frame has limited resonance with voters prioritising cost-of-living (74% in Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus priority-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Climate frame aligns with EU Fit-for-55 and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) obligations; international-legitimacy authority for the opposition position</td><td>EU Climate Package</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Young voters (18–29) prioritise climate over fuel cost 52/48 (Ungdomsbarometern 2025); MP's frame captures this cohort</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern 2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Naturskyddsföreningen / WWF / Fridays for Future coalition can amplify MP's frame via civil-society pressure</td><td>Environmental NGO activation patterns</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government can frame S+MP as "elitist" on cost-of-living — inverts S's traditional working-class brand</td><td>SD and M rural-voter messaging</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Extra-budget vote is fast-tracked; opposition has ≤ 4 weeks to build narrative before vote</td><td>FiU fast-track procedure</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Transport-sector unions (Transportarbetareförbundet) may publicly split from S on this issue</td><td>Trade-union historical position</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Climate Act (<em>Klimatlagen 2017:720</em>) obligates the government to pursue policies consistent with the long-term goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 and interim targets:</p>
 
 
@@ -5167,7 +5167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Cont
 <p><strong>Analytic claim <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cut moves Sweden <strong>further away</strong> from its 2030 Climate Act target, at a moment when the government is already ~20% behind that target. MP's HD024098 can cite this as a measurable, reviewable, court-testable obligation breach. In principle, under §5 of Klimatlagen, the government must explain to parliament if a policy measure is incompatible with the climate targets.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5202,7 +5202,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference is the crucial variable. If S does not front Norrland-anchored S MPs in the news cycle, SD will convert this into a "urban elite vs rural family" frame that costs S more electorally than MP's climate frame gains. Historical precedent: 2018 carbon-tax debate (France → Gilets Jaunes) — the lesson is that without a rural counter-offer, climate fiscal policy generates majority backlash.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5261,7 +5261,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of the seven jurisdictions analysed, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt is a direct precedent</strong> for Sweden's proposed cut, and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> because the electoral benefit did not materialise. The proposition is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong> — a point the opposition can cite in newsroom debate.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5323,7 +5323,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FR1</td><td>Fuel tax cut passes; S loses 1–2% Norrland vote before 2026</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Deploy rural S MPs in media; counter-propose transit/EV subsidy</td><td>FiU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR2</td><td>EU Commission initiates infringement proceedings against Sweden for Climate Act / Fit-for-55 backsliding</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>MP escalates via EU remissvar; green-MEP amplification</td><td>Post-adoption Q3-Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR3</td><td>Government narrative ("S and MP out of touch with rural Sweden") dominates 2-week news cycle</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Front rural MPs; counter-propose; attack distributional impact</td><td>Immediate post-filing</td></tr><tr><td>FR4</td><td>Transport unions break publicly from S, endorse government's cut</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>S-union dialogue pre-empting public statement</td><td>Within 14 days</td></tr><tr><td>FR5</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet issues critical report citing the cut</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP in remissvar amplifies Council findings</td><td>Annual report Q1 2027</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5373,7 +5373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which Fi committee MP gets the rapporteur</td><td>≤ 14 days</td><td>FR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norrland local-media coverage</strong></td><td>Content analysis of Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT</td><td>Weekly</td><td>FR1, FR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Transport union statement</strong></td><td>Public position from Transportarbetareförbundet</td><td>Within 21 days</td><td>FR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket Q2 2026 climate report</strong></td><td>Quantified emissions impact estimate</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>FR2, FR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU DG CLIMA monitoring letter</strong></td><td>Any DG CLIMA comment on Swedish policy backsliding</td><td>Q3-Q4 2026</td><td>FR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</strong></td><td>Annual Swedish climate council assessment</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>FR5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         S["S · Mikael Damberg&#x3C;br/>HD024082&#x3C;br/>FISCAL"]
@@ -5429,7 +5429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Clus
     style EU_DG_CLIMA fill:#003399,color:#fff
     style KlimatR fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut adds 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling</td></tr><tr><td>Government will pass the cut</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; Finance Ministry ownership</td></tr><tr><td>S loses ≥1% Norrland vote if rural counter-frame not deployed</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2022 baseline + historical rural-fuel elasticity</td></tr><tr><td>MP's climate frame resonates with 18-29 voters > cost-of-living frame</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern but priority framing effects</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission initiates infringement within 18 months</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>DG CLIMA politically cautious; Sweden in "monitoring" not "procedure" zone</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 3</li>
 <li><strong>Risk assessment</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>../risk-assessment.md</code></a> R03</li>
@@ -5484,7 +5484,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5536,7 +5536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>RCPT-CLUSTER-2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:229 — <em>En ny mottagandelag</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-13 (V) · 2026-04-15 (S, MP, C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>10/10 (unprecedented 4-party coordination)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9.40</strong> (×0.94 — electoral/policy axis, not constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 6 — multi-party coordination on P1 policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead selection</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has not seen <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions against a single government proposition in a 72-hour window at any point in the current riksmöte. The last comparable four-party convergence on an immigration bill was the 2022 "Migration Package" debates — and even then, motions were staggered across a week and coordinated informally. The April 2026 reception-law cluster is <strong>tighter, more public, and more electorally framed</strong> than that precedent.</p>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) is the Tidö government's flagship asylum-reception reform. It replaces the 1994 reception act (<em>Lagen om mottagande av asylsökande m.fl.</em>) with a new architecture that:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5551,7 +5551,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: This is primarily a <em>campaign-narrative construction</em> cluster. The parties are building a broad, electorally legible anti-Tidö story on the dominant 2026 migration issue while preserving differentiated messages for their own voter coalitions (V's total rejection vs. C's proportionality test). A secondary hypothesis is that the cluster also functions as a limited <em>coalition-rehearsal</em> exercise: if the common line holds through chamber vote (expected June 2026), it modestly strengthens the case that a shared opposition front can be sustained after the election. Readers should treat coalition-rehearsal as contingent inference, not as the dominant operational logic.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Committee</th><th>Rhetorical frame</th><th>Core demand</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024076</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Rights-based rejection</em> — "asylum is a right, not a privilege to be earned"</td><td>Total rejection of the law; preserve pre-existing reception act</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024080</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Ida Karkiainen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Welfare-state protection</em> — "asylum housing must not be privatised"</td><td>Remove private-operator provisions; return to parliament with a revised proposal that excludes private asylum housing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024087</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>EU-compliance and humanitarian</em> — "Sweden cannot undercut the EU Pact's minimum standards"</td><td>Reject the law; invoke EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) integration minimums</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024089</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Administrative workability</em> — "reform is too fast, will break municipal capacity"</td><td>Amend the law; phase implementation; restore municipal discretion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Division-of-labour analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Four motions, four distinct frames, one shared target. V takes the principled-left flank; S anchors the welfare-state case; MP internationalises via EU law; C occupies the pragmatist centre. A Tidö-aligned media response that attacks one frame (e.g., "V is soft on criminals") fails against the other three. This is <strong>defence-in-depth messaging</strong> — a hallmark of a coordinated opposition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5683,7 +5683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Unprecedented coordination demonstrates opposition discipline</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89 all filed within 72 hours on same prop.</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — Four distinct frames cover entire voter-coalition surface (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric axis above</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — C's moderate frame (HD024089) insulates cluster from "obstructionism" attack</td><td>C demands amendment, not rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — Publicly visible filing cadence creates sustained news cycle</td><td>4 separate newsroom events over 2 days</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024076) and C's amendment (HD024089) cannot co-govern — coalition is rhetorical, not programmatic</td><td>Compare HD024076 (reject) vs HD024089 (amend) texts</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — S filed HD024080 despite having governed 2014–2022 with successively stricter reception policy — legacy-credibility gap</td><td>S migration-policy shift 2015 (Löfven) → 2022</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — No cluster-wide joint statement or press conference released; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's "EU compliance" frame has limited domestic traction (≤15% of voters cite EU law salience; Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus survey 2026-Q1</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Immigration cluster displaces government agenda for 2–3 news cycles, denying M/SD coverage of other wins</td><td>Expected media cycle post-filing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Post-2026 S+V+MP+C majority scenario (P≈0.15, see scenario-analysis.md) would allow reception-law repeal</td><td>Election prior analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — C's amendment frame creates narrow negotiation channel with L (coalition centrist) — may split Tidö</td><td>L's historical press-freedom / integration posture</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — 62% voter support for stricter immigration (Novus 2026-Q1) means government owns the dominant narrative</td><td>Novus migration-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — SD framing "opposition defends the unvetted" in attack ads will resonate with 2022 SD voters (20% of electorate)</td><td>SD 2022 election data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Legal-aid and housing NGOs may publicly split if S's private-operator carve-out passes into the amended law</td><td>Anticipated Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5718,7 +5718,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The interference <strong>W1 × T1</strong> — the rhetorical incompatibility between V's rejection and C's amendment under a dominant government narrative — is the <strong>single most consequential variable</strong> for whether this cluster converts into durable 2026 electoral advantage. If the four parties can stage-manage the SfU vote sequence (amendment → rejection), the cluster holds. If they cannot, the government's "disarray" frame wins.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but the <strong>combination</strong> of private-sector operation + time-limited benefits + activation duties is on the restrictive end of EU practice.</p>
 
 
@@ -5779,7 +5779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative Interna
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The private-operation provision is the <strong>distinctive outlier</strong>. Only Germany (via Länder-level discretion) offers a close parallel, and Germany's CDU/CSU–SPD governance has maintained active oversight of private operators. The opposition's privatisation-focus in HD024080 is therefore <strong>well-aligned with comparative best practice</strong> — it attacks the provision that deviates most from Nordic peers. See <code>comparative-international.md</code> §1 for full analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5841,7 +5841,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L (1-5)</th><th align="center">I (1-5)</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RR1</td><td>Law passes with private-operator provision intact; S's HD024080 frame fails electorally</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>20</strong></td><td>S must convert housing-privatisation into "welfare-privatisation" umbrella frame</td><td>SfU vote, expected May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR2</td><td>Law challenged at Administrative Court on EU Pact compatibility grounds; ECJ referral possible</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Government legal review shows Pact alignment; MP's HD024087 frame anchors challenge</td><td>Post-adoption legal challenge Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR3</td><td>V's total rejection (HD024076) is singled out in SD attack ads as "pro-illegal-immigration" stance; V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with border-capacity-building alternatives</td><td>SD campaign Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR4</td><td>C's amendment frame (HD024089) is co-opted by government to add minor changes and claim consensus</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C's leadership must refuse any amendment that preserves private-operator core</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>RR5</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 identifies ECHR Art. 8 concerns (family unity); opposition gains legal authority for its position</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet published opinions</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5891,7 +5891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal to watch</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates which risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SfU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which M/SD/KD MP gets the rapporteur role</td><td>Within 14 days</td><td>RR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</strong></td><td>Public release; look for references to "privat aktör" and "rättssäkerhet"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>RR2, RR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Joint opposition press statement</strong></td><td>Four-leader joint presser — holds vs fails coordination</td><td>May 2026</td><td>W1 mitigation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Novus migration salience</strong></td><td>Monthly tracking; focus on "is private asylum housing acceptable?" split</td><td>Monthly 2026</td><td>RR1, RR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L internal debate</strong></td><td>Any L MP (especially Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) breaking on amendments</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>O3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</strong></td><td>Published NGO positions on private-operator carve-out</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>Threat 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Filers["🗳️ Filing Parties (coordination front)"]
         V["V · HD024076&#x3C;br/>Tony Haddou&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -5949,7 +5949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Receptio
     style KD fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style L fill:#fd7e14,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5992,7 +5992,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Four-party coordination is unprecedented in 2025/26 riksmöte</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Filing-date analysis from riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code></td></tr><tr><td>Cluster is lead story of the news-motions run for 2026-04-20</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>DIW weighting + media-attention scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Law will pass despite cluster (prior P ≈ 0.85)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; no defection signal</td></tr><tr><td>C's amendment frame will convert 1–2 L MPs to support</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>L internal divisions historically exist but rarely break Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster will shift Novus migration-issue salience by 2–4 points over 2 weeks</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historical post-filing polling shifts on high-salience issues</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP+C can form post-2026 majority government</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Current polling: S+V+MP+C ≈ 42–45%; would require gains</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 1</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference map</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §Cross-Party Alignment</li>
@@ -6009,7 +6009,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6045,7 +6045,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:55 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Translate the April 2026 opposition coordination into 349-seat arithmetic — which governing combinations become more or less viable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Novus April 2026 trend, SCB-SOM Autumn 2025, Val.se 2022 result, Riksdagen seat distribution</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH on current chamber maths · 🟧 MEDIUM on post-election projections (election 5 months away)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT, scenario, and risk artifacts answer <em>what</em> and <em>why</em>. They do not answer the operational question every editor, civil servant, and foreign desk needs: <strong>which governments are and are not possible after September 2026, and how does the April wave change those numbers?</strong></p>
 <p>This artifact provides:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -6056,7 +6056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic I
 <li>Explicit propagation of the April-wave polling delta (from <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3).</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6113,8 +6113,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">2022 seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong> — Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong> — Sverigedemokraterna</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Government support (Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M</strong> — Moderaterna</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> — Vänsterpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong> — Centerpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong> — Kristdemokraterna</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> — Miljöpartiet</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong> — Liberalerna</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h3>
-<h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h4>
+<h4 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6145,7 +6145,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Key structural fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Tidö majority is <strong>+1 seat</strong> — the narrowest plausible governing majority. A single by-election loss, party-switch, or suspension collapses it. The opposition is <strong>2 seats short</strong> — within polling sampling error. April 2026 is therefore happening in a <strong>genuinely contested</strong> chamber, not a safe-government context.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wave polling effect):</p>
 
 
@@ -6210,7 +6210,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projectio
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>4-percent threshold warning <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: L at 4.3 % is <strong>within the ±1.5 pp Novus sampling band</strong> of the 4.0 % Riksdag threshold. A single bad polling month pushes L below; if L misses the threshold its seats redistribute (≈ 15 of the 16 flow to M/KD/SD under Sainte-Laguë). This is the <strong>single largest single-party uncertainty</strong> in the 2026 election.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6241,7 +6241,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hi
 <p><strong>Inversion finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 pre-wave polling already projects a <strong>~23-seat opposition majority</strong> — a 26-seat swing from the 2022 +1 Tidö majority. If these polling numbers survive to election day, the Tidö bloc <strong>cannot form a government</strong> without a realignment involving C.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h3>
 <p>From <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-year waves is a <strong>−1.3 pp median shift against the government</strong> in the three weeks following a ≥ 10-motion coordinated opposition wave. Applying that prior to the April 2026 polling baseline:</p>
 
 
@@ -6295,8 +6295,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta —
 <p><strong>Decision-useful takeaway <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Across <em>every</em> plausible polling-delta scenario derived from the historical base rate, <strong>the opposition projected seat total remains ≥ 200</strong> and the Tidö total <strong>remains ≤ 160</strong>. The April wave does not create an opposition majority; <strong>it widens an opposition majority that already existed in pre-wave polling</strong>. The correct framing is "opposition widens lead" not "opposition gains lead".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ = mathematically possible (≥ 175 seats) AND politically plausible (no ruled-out blocks)</li>
 <li>🟧 = mathematically possible but requires political compromises with declared ruled-out actors</li>
@@ -6364,12 +6364,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Coalition</th><th align="center">Seats (median delta)</th><th align="center">Viability</th><th>Political barriers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>S + V + MP</strong> (red-green classic)</td><td align="center">119 + 34 + 19 = <strong>172</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (3 short)</td><td>None intrinsic; needs C tolerance</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>S + V + MP + C</strong> (4-party opposition bloc)</td><td align="center">172 + 26 = <strong>198</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td>C historically ruled out V; Sep 2025 Muharrem Demirok signalled conditional openness on migration</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>S + C</strong> (grand-centre minority with SD tolerance? — politically toxic for S)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 = <strong>145</strong></td><td align="center">❌</td><td>Below threshold; SD support unthinkable for S</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>S + C + MP</strong> (excluding V)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 + 19 = <strong>164</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (11 short)</td><td>Would need V tolerance, back to #2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Tidö-continued</strong> (M + KD + L + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 16 + 65 = <strong>160</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (15 short)</td><td>Below threshold under April polling</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tidö + L replaced by C</strong> (M + KD + C + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 26 + 65 = <strong>170</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (5 short)</td><td>C has ruled out SD cooperation; would implode C</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>"Grand coalition" S + M</strong></td><td align="center">119 + 62 = <strong>181</strong></td><td align="center">🟧</td><td>No mainstream support in either party; historically unprecedented in Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Most probable post-2026 government <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>Scenario #2 (S + V + MP + C)</strong> is the <strong>only mathematically viable AND politically plausible</strong> configuration under current polling. The April 2026 opposition wave has a specific effect: it <strong>demonstrates operational capacity for exactly this configuration</strong> ahead of post-election negotiations. Whether intentional or not, the wave functions as <strong>coalition-capability signalling</strong> to C's own voters and party apparatus.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h3>
 <p>Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government with V — a boundary C has historically policed strongly. The April wave provides <strong>three data points on C's posture</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Poi
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Interpretation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: C's filing pattern is <strong>consistent with conditional post-election cooperation, not fusion</strong>. It signals "we can govern with them on issue-by-issue basis" not "we are a bloc with them". This is exactly the <strong>tolerated minority-government</strong> arithmetic that has characterised Swedish politics since 2014 (Löfven I S-MP with V tolerance; Löfven II S-MP-C-L decemberöverenskommelse; Andersson S minority with V tolerance).</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cabinet</strong>: S + MP (two-party cabinet, ~138 seats represented)</li>
 <li><strong>Budget confidence</strong>: V + C tolerate with <strong>policy-specific red lines</strong> (V on welfare spending, C on fiscal discipline)</li>
@@ -6409,7 +6409,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational fo
 <li><strong>Stability forecast</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — comparable to Löfven II (survived ~3 years before early-triggered crisis)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining five months to the election:</p>
 
 
@@ -6456,7 +6456,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–
 <p><strong>Most informative single indicator <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>The June 2026 chamber vote on the April motion cluster.</strong> If S+V+MP+C vote together on even 3 of the 7 clusters, scenario #2 prior rises to ≥ 0.70. If the cluster fractures below 2, scenario #2 prior falls to ≤ 0.45 and the election becomes more genuinely contested.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6499,7 +6499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Invalidating event</th><th>Effect</th><th>Re-run trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>L drops below 4 % in two consecutive polls</strong></td><td>Tidö loses 15+ seats; opposition math widens further</td><td>Update bloc totals immediately</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L recovers to ≥ 5 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~5 seats; still short but not decisively</td><td>Revise seat table</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD surge to ≥ 22 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~12 seats; scenario #5 re-enters 🟧 range</td><td>Add scenario #5 detail</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S–V open split (V declares no tolerance)</strong></td><td>Scenario #2 collapses to scenario #1 (172 seats, short); deadlock</td><td>Major revision</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C joins centre-right talks post-election</strong></td><td>Scenario #6 moves from ❌ to 🟧; six-way negotiation</td><td>Rework §5 fully</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early-election trigger before Sep 2026</strong></td><td>Entire framework re-baselines</td><td>Not expected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> The Tidö government has already lost its projected majority under April 2026 polling — <strong>before</strong> the wave polling effect is applied.</li>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> Scenario #2 (S+V+MP+C cooperation) is the only viable post-election government configuration and the April wave is consistent with capability-signalling for it.</li>
@@ -6508,7 +6508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Con
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Reviewer note</strong>: seat projections use Sainte-Laguë allocation with 4 % threshold; the Novus April mid-month average is the baseline. Update this file when the May 20, 2026 polls are published. The <code>historical-baseline.md</code> polling-delta priors feed directly into §4 here.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6543,11 +6543,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Why this matters</strong>: ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 8 mandates international benchmarking for P0/P1 documents on policy reform. Three of the four April 2026 opposition-motion clusters meet that threshold. Without comparative context, Swedish-domestic framing becomes self-referential and obscures whether the government's reforms are inside or outside the Nordic/EU policy mainstream.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) combines centralised Migrationsverket-run facilities, private-sector operation, time-limited benefits, and activation duties. Four opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024076/80/87/89). S's HD024080 specifically attacks <strong>private-sector operation</strong>. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6638,7 +6638,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comp
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>private-operation provision</strong> is the <strong>distinctive Swedish outlier</strong> relative to Nordic peers. Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Netherlands all operate state-centred reception without private sub-contracting of housing. Germany permits private operation <strong>under Länder-level oversight</strong> — this is the closest parallel, but it exists because of German federalism, not by design. Austria briefly experimented with BBU-GmbH (state-owned limited company) and private sub-contracting; the experiment generated repeated public scandals over housing conditions (2018–2021) and Austria has since rolled back private contracts. <strong>S's HD024080 anti-privatisation frame is therefore aligned with comparative best practice, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h4>
 <p>The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Conditions) sets <strong>minimum standards</strong> for reception, including:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Article 17: material reception conditions must "ensure adequate standard of living"</li>
@@ -6650,11 +6650,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on
 <p><strong>MP's HD024087 argument <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Explicitly invokes the EU Pact, arguing the new reception law's private-operator provisions risk non-compliance with Art. 17 (material conditions). <strong>Comparative strength</strong>: The Austrian BBU experience shows private operators generated documented non-compliance with exactly this article. MP's legal frame is therefore evidence-supported.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:235 expands deportation triggers for non-citizens convicted of crimes. Three opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024090/95/97). C's HD024095 demands <strong>statutory proportionality testing</strong> ("systematic repeated offences over time"). Does this align with European practice?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6734,17 +6734,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparat
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>statutory proportionality test is the modal European approach</strong>. Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, UK, and Belgium all codify deportation-proportionality criteria in legislation, not administrative guidance. <strong>C's HD024095 therefore converges with the European statutory mainstream</strong> — framing it as a leftist or liberal outlier would be factually incorrect. It is a rule-of-law convergence proposal.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h4>
 <p>Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have <strong>lower adverse ECtHR judgment counts</strong> (mean 1.67) than administrative-test jurisdictions (Sweden, Norway: mean 3.5). The correlation is not perfectly causal — ECtHR caseload also depends on litigation capacity — but <strong>statutory specificity does correlate with fewer successful Strasbourg challenges</strong>, which is in the government's own interest.</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Reportable fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The government's legal case for prop. 2025/26:235 would be <em>strengthened</em>, not weakened, by adopting C's HD024095 proportionality language. Opposition editors may use this in newsroom interviews.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes via an <em>extra ändringsbudget</em>. S (HD024082) attacks fiscal framing; MP (HD024098) attacks climate coherence. How does this compare to peer climate-committed democracies 2022–2026?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6802,7 +6802,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt)</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut. Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong>, and the measure is now cited in German policy discourse as an unproductive use of fiscal space that did not buy political goodwill. The Swedish government is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6849,11 +6849,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement C
 <p><strong>Analytic implication <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Sweden's climate-law mechanism is <strong>weaker than Germany, Netherlands, UK, and France</strong> in enforceability. MP's HD024098 cannot easily convert to a <em>Urgenda</em>-style court challenge. The political-accountability route (Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report) is the only credible path. Opposition analysts should manage expectations accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:228 modernises Sweden's arms-export framework post-NATO accession. V (HD024091) rejects totally; MP (HD024096) demands end-user review. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6948,7 +6948,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Co
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>MP's HD024096 end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</strong> (aligned with Norway, Netherlands, post-2021 Germany). It is <strong>not</strong> an outlier, ideological, or anti-defence position. Opposition newsroom framing should reflect this: "MP asks Sweden to match Norwegian practice" is more accurate than "MP demands unprecedented restrictions".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Opposition Motions — Comparative Benchmarking Position
     x-axis "More Restrictive than Peers" --> "More Permissive than Peers"
@@ -6972,7 +6972,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-
 <p><strong>Visualisation reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Seven of the ten cluster motions cluster in the <strong>evidence-supported mainstream quadrant</strong> (top-left) — aligned with Nordic/EU peer practice and supported by measurable data. Three V motions (total-rejection positions) sit in the <strong>ideological outlier</strong> quadrant — not because they are empirically wrong, but because V does not provide a bridge to administrative practice.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7010,7 +7010,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>Reportable statement</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Private asylum housing</td><td>"Of six Nordic/EU peers, only Germany (via Länder discretion) operates similar private-reception contracting. Austria rolled it back after 2018–2021 scandals."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal deportation proportionality</td><td>"Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, UK, and Denmark all use statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 converges with European practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cuts</td><td>"The only peer jurisdiction that cut fuel taxes in 2022–2026 (Germany's Tankrabatt) did not extend the cut due to poor electoral payoff."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export end-user review</td><td>"MP's HD024096 end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-law enforcement</td><td>"Sweden's climate-law mechanism is weaker than Germany's, which produced the 2021 BVerfG ruling forcing emission cuts."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Most-similar design</strong> applied for Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI) — small open-economy parliamentary democracies with welfare states.</li>
 <li><strong>Most-different design</strong> applied for UK, France, Germany — testing whether policy effects replicate across structurally different systems.</li>
@@ -7024,7 +7024,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (cluster-specific comparison)</li>
 <li><code>deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (ECHR alignment)</li>
@@ -7036,11 +7036,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:02 UTC | <strong>Data Depth</strong>: SUMMARY (MCP get_motioner)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7290,7 +7290,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Motion Nr</th><th>Title (EN)</th><th>Party</th><th>Committee</th><th>Domain</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024080</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4080</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>S</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024087</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4087</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024089</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4089</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024076</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4076</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024090</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4090</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4097</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4095</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules (partial)</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024077</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4077</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>V</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024079</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4079</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>S</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024086</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4086</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>MP</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD024082</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4082</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>S</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD024098</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4098</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>MP</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD024078</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4078</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>S</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024084</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4084</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>V</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024085</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4085</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>MP</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD024081</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4081</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>S</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD024083</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4083</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>V</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD024094</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4094</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>C</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD024091</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4091</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>V</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD024096</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4096</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>MP</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>HD024088</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4088</td><td>Consumer credit law</td><td>C</td><td>CU</td><td>Finance/Consumer</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
     "Immigration/Integration" : 10
     "Fiscal/Climate" : 2
@@ -7299,7 +7299,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domai
     "Defense/Arms Export" : 2
     "Finance/Consumer" : 1</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--committee-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[21 Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 14-17, 2026] --> B[SfU: 7 motions&#x3C;br/>🔴 Immigration Cluster]
     A --> C[AU: 3 motions&#x3C;br/>🟠 Integration Housing]
@@ -7315,7 +7315,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-
     style F fill:#69db7c,color:#000
     style G fill:#ffa94d,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7383,22 +7383,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>SfU</th><th>AU</th><th>CU</th><th>SoU</th><th>FiU</th><th>UU</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td><strong>5</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td><strong>4</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>7</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>4</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>21</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-classification-findings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-classification-findings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed motions on <strong>three simultaneous immigration-related propositions</strong> — a coordinated response not seen since the 2022 Migration Package debates. This signals a deliberate opposition strategy to frame immigration as the central political battleground before the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>Both S (center-left) and MP (Green) oppose the government's fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. This unusual alignment of economic-left and climate-green parties creates a unified messaging opportunity: the government is both economically irresponsible (S) and climate-damaging (MP).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>V and MP both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation, continuing a consistent pattern of opposing Sweden's post-2022 defense-industrial pivot. With NATO membership now settled, this opposition has limited practical effect but strong electoral signaling value for their core voters.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>The unusual alignment of S, V, and C against prop. 2025/26:216 (municipal healthcare medical competence) reflects a substantive policy disagreement about regulatory design, not just partisan positioning.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:08 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7472,7 +7472,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Ref
 <p><strong>Scope note</strong>: The table above is restricted to the canonical 21-motion April 14–17 opposition set filed against government propositions. Related parliamentary items (e.g., skr. 2025/26:226 on Sida humanitarian aid and its follow-on motions HD024070 / HD024072) fall outside this dossier's scope and are tracked in a separate skrivelse analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Immigration["🏠 Immigration Policy Cluster"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law]
@@ -7504,8 +7504,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Ne
     Immigration -->|security context| Defense
     P222 -->|enforcement side| P235</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--party-coordination-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-coordination-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph AllFour["All 4 Opposition Parties"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>Reception Law&#x3C;br/>S+V+MP+C]
@@ -7532,8 +7532,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Ali
     style TwoParties fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style OneParty fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--previous-period-cross-references"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-period-cross-references"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p>The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previous run:</p>
 
 
@@ -7561,14 +7561,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Previous Motion</th><th>Today's Related Motion</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024090–HD024097 (April 16)</td><td>Today's April 14-15 motions</td><td>Same policy packages, earlier filings</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097 (MP, deportation)</td><td>HD024090 (V, deportation)</td><td>Parallel rejection strategies</td></tr><tr><td>HD024093 (C, cybersecurity)</td><td>HD024095 (C, deportation)</td><td>C's consistent "more analysis needed" framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>The immigration motions continue opposition strategy from 2024/25 riksmöte when similar restrictions were resisted</li>
 <li>V's complete rejection pattern (HD024090, HD024091) mirrors V's consistent "no" to all security-related legislation since 2022</li>
 <li>MP's partial acceptance approach (HD024097 preserving parts of deportation law) shows MP learning from 2022 when total rejections cost them parliamentary representation</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7601,7 +7601,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cros
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion Cluster</th><th>Economic Context Link</th><th>Data Point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Immigration motions (HD024076/80/87/89)</td><td>Unemployment rising to 8.69% (2025) increases political salience</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax motions (HD024082/98)</td><td>Sweden GDP growth only 0.82% (2024), down from 5.2% (2021)</td><td>World Bank NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG 2024</td></tr><tr><td>Housing motions (HD024077/79/86)</td><td>Integration impacts long-term labour supply; unemployment context</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export (HD024091/96)</td><td>Sweden's defence spending 2.1% GDP (2025) post-NATO</td><td>NATO benchmarking context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>SfU Hearings</strong> (May 2026): All immigration motions will be heard in Social Affairs Committee — expect testimony from Röda Korset, UNHCR Sweden</li>
 <li><strong>FiU Budget Vote</strong> (May 2026): Fuel tax extra budget — HD024082/98 will be voted down but provide campaign material</li>
@@ -7609,7 +7609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Co
 <li><strong>CIA Platform connection</strong>: Voting records for these motions will appear at <a href="https://hack23.github.io/cia/">https://hack23.github.io/cia/</a> when chamber votes occur (June 2026)</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7641,7 +7641,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Reference-exemplar self-audit per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 §Reference Standards</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework versions</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 · DIW v1.0 · Political Risk Matrix v2.0 · Political SWOT v2.2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Iterations</strong></td><td>Pass 1 (2026-04-20 13:10 UTC) → Pass 2 (2026-04-20 14:00 UTC) — both complete</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth achieved</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> on LEAD + co-LEAD clusters; <strong>L2</strong> on tertiary clusters; L1 on baseline artifacts</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data provenance</strong></td><td>Public Riksdagen API · SCB · Novus · SOM-institutet · World Bank · EU Pact documents · RSF · V-Dem · ECtHR HUDOC · national climate-law texts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.</p>
 
 
@@ -7717,7 +7717,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-h
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rule</th><th>Requirement</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Every claim cites dok_id / named actor / vote count / primary source</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>200+ dok_id references; named politicians in all clusters</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Confidence labels on every major claim</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> applied throughout</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Mermaid diagrams with accessible (color-contrast 4.5:1) palettes</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>15+ diagrams; all use cyberpunk-theme-compliant colours</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Quantified risk (L × I × score × ALARP band)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> 15 risks scored</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Multi-framework triangulation (SWOT + STRIDE/MITRE + ACH + scenario-tree)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> TOWS; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> STRIDE + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> ACH + scenario-tree</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>L-tier classification (L1 / L2 / L2+ / L3) assigned per document</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a>; 4 cluster analyses at L2+; top-level at L1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Reference-exemplar file set for P1 priority</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>README, executive-brief, scenario, comparative, methodology-reflection all present</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>International benchmarking for policy-reform P0/P1</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> 4 policy axes, ≥5 comparators each</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>Red-Team / devil's-advocate critique</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Red-Team Box; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td>Bayesian update rules + forward indicators</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §6 ; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> forward-indicator table</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Rule-compliance score</strong>: 10 / 10. All reference-exemplar requirements met.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7810,8 +7810,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>classification-results.md</code></td><td align="center">L1</td><td>Baseline taxonomy; required for all dossiers</td></tr><tr><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>DIW methodology + sensitivity analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>4-cluster SWOT + TOWS interference matrix</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>15 risks scored, Bayesian priors, interconnection graph, ALARP</td></tr><tr><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>6 threats + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE</td></tr><tr><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>8 groups, 20+ named actors, influence graph</td></tr><tr><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>Proposition-motion matrix + coordination network</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; scenario-specific artifact</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; comparative benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Master synthesis; integrates all pillars</td></tr><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>1-page BLUF</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>This file</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>4-party cluster; division-of-labour; 15+ dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>3-party triangulation; ECHR comparative</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; climate-fiscal quantification</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; NATO post-accession context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Baseline artifacts (classification, significance, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder, cross-ref, synthesis)</li>
 <li>Single-frame analysis on each cluster</li>
@@ -7820,7 +7820,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 1
 <li>Synthesis at ~100 lines; SWOT at ~126 lines; risk at ~109 lines</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 07:16 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>:
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 0
@@ -7834,7 +7834,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -7844,10 +7844,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-baseline"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7883,7 +7883,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:40 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Put the April 14–17 2026 opposition wave in multi-cycle historical context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Riksdagen Öppna Data (document index), SVT/DN/SvD archive, Novus/SOM time-series</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH (public filing index is complete) · 🟧 MEDIUM on cross-period comparability (changing committee structure)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h3>
 <p>Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and hard to falsify without a baseline. This artifact answers three calibration questions that every other artifact in this dossier depends on:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>How often does four-party opposition coordination happen in the Swedish Riksdag?</strong> (bearing on the <code>[HIGH]</code>-confidence "unprecedented" claim in the LEAD cluster)</li>
@@ -7891,7 +7891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Mat
 <li><strong>Does the 2026 wave show quantitatively different coordination patterns compared to past waves — or is it a regression to a well-known Swedish mean?</strong></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h3>
 <p>The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where <strong>≥ 3 opposition parties filed ≥ 10 counter-motions against government propositions within a ≤ 14-day window on a common policy cluster</strong>. Inclusion criteria are deliberately strict so that the 2026 event is judged against its real peers, not noise.</p>
 
 
@@ -7998,7 +7998,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposit
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Period</th><th>Cluster theme</th><th>Parties (filing)</th><th align="center">Counter-motions</th><th>Against gov. of</th><th align="center">Election that year?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>2014-03</td><td>Defence / NATO-adjacent procurement (JAS)</td><td>S, MP, V</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Reinfeldt (M-led Alliance)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>2015-11</td><td>Winter migration package (asylum restrictions)</td><td>V, C, L, (later MP split)</td><td align="center">14</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>2017-02</td><td>Welfare-profit limitation (Reepalu)</td><td>M, C, L, KD</td><td align="center">17</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌ (election 2018)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>2018-04</td><td>Security / FRA signals intelligence reform</td><td>V, C, L</td><td align="center">10</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2018</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>2020-04</td><td>Pandemic extra-budget and Covid-Act</td><td>M, KD, SD</td><td align="center">12</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>2021-06</td><td>Labour-market law (LAS) reform</td><td>V, M, KD</td><td align="center">13</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌ (early-triggered crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>2022-03</td><td>Gang-crime / organised-crime package</td><td>V, MP, C</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Andersson (S)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2022</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>2023-11</td><td>Energy / nuclear re-regulation</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>2024-10</td><td>Migration — return-centres bill</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 10</td><td><strong>2026-04</strong></td><td><strong>Reception + Deportation + Housing + Fuel Tax + Arms + Consumer + Healthcare</strong></td><td><strong>S, V, MP, C</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>21</strong></td><td><strong>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>✅ Sept. 2026</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h4>
 <p>Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period framing:</p>
 
 
@@ -8035,7 +8035,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the
 <p><strong>Revised headline</strong>: The April 2026 wave is the <strong>third four-party S+V+MP+C offensive against the Kristersson government</strong> and the <strong>largest single-wave in motion count (21)</strong> in the 2014–2026 observation window. Its coordination pattern is not novel in type; it is unusually broad in scope.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h3>
 <p>Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates discipline this. For each comparable election-year wave (rows 1, 4, 7) the table below records the wave's quantitative features and the electoral outcome six months later.</p>
 
 
@@ -8083,7 +8083,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Wave</th><th align="center">Motion count</th><th align="center">Parties</th><th align="center">Gov. polling Δ (−3 mo vs −1 mo to vote)</th><th align="center">Opposition polling Δ</th><th align="center">Government change?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">2014-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">S+MP+V</td><td align="center">−1.8 pp</td><td align="center">+1.4 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2018-04</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">V+C+L</td><td align="center">−0.9 pp</td><td align="center">+0.6 pp</td><td align="center">✅ (via 4-mo crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2022-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">V+MP+C</td><td align="center">−1.1 pp</td><td align="center">+1.7 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>2026 median prior</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≈ 10–11</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≥3</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>−1.3 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+1.2 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>3 / 3 = 100 % — but n = 3</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h4>
 <p>The 2026 wave is <strong>larger</strong> (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two reasonable priors follow:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scaling prior</strong>: If motion count is a weak proxy for opposition organisation, and past waves produced ≈ −1.3 pp for the government, the 2026 effect may scale modestly — <strong>expected −1.5 to −2.0 pp</strong> on Tidö bloc aggregate in the Apr–May 2026 Novus / SCB-SOM polls.</li>
@@ -8093,7 +8093,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to
 <p><strong>Forecast window <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Polls released May 6–20, 2026 are the primary calibration moment. A government polling loss <strong>&#x3C; 0.8 pp</strong> falsifies the "broad wave = broad effect" prior and supports the diminishing-returns hypothesis. A loss <strong>> 2.0 pp</strong> supports the scaling prior and moves the Election 2026 prior toward government change.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the <strong>most similar</strong> prior event (same four parties, same government, same migration theme, same parliamentary term), it is the strongest comparator. The deltas below isolate what is genuinely new in 2026.</p>
 
 
@@ -8159,8 +8159,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. C
 <p><strong>Key finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The 2026 wave's <strong>genuine novelty is not coordination existence (that already happened in 2024) but coordination breadth across issue clusters and committees</strong> combined with differentiated framing. This is a <em>qualitative</em> upgrade in opposition operational capacity. It is the opposition equivalent of a combined-arms operation rather than a single-front push.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Opposition counter-motions per riksmöte (partial for 2025/26)"
     x-axis ["2014/15","2015/16","2016/17","2017/18","2018/19","2019/20","2020/21","2021/22","2022/23","2023/24","2024/25","2025/26 YTD"]
@@ -8169,7 +8169,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Trend observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Opposition filing volume has risen ~90% from 2014/15 to 2024/25, with the sharpest acceleration from 2022/23 onward (under the current government). The 2025/26 YTD count of 238 (≈ 60% of the riksmöte elapsed) projects to <strong>≈ 397 by end-of-term if the pace holds</strong> — which would be a new record.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h4>
 <p>Counting the share of opposition motions where <strong>≥ 3 parties file on the same proposition within ≤ 48 hours</strong> of each other:</p>
 
 
@@ -8211,7 +8211,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day
 <p><strong>Systemic finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 wave is not an outlier; it is the <strong>visible peak of a two-year rising trend</strong> in opposition coordination. Treating it as a unique event risks missing the structural change. The more interesting analytic question is <strong>what is causing coordination to rise systematically</strong> — candidate explanations: (1) government's reliance on SD for majority reduces centre-right cross-over options for opposition, collapsing them into one bloc; (2) professionalisation of party-level parliamentary strategy offices; (3) SOM-measured voter polarisation increasing the cost of differentiated opposition.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8252,7 +8252,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This B
 <p><strong>Methodological note</strong>: This historical-baseline artifact is the <strong>confidence-calibration layer</strong> of the dossier. Its purpose is to prevent single-event over-reading. All downstream claims in <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, and <code>risk-assessment.md</code> should be stress-tested against the base rates here, not only against qualitative inference.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coverage</strong>: Riksdagen Öppna Data filing index is complete back to the 2002/03 riksmöte. The 2014–2026 window is chosen because the current five-party bloc structure stabilised post-2014.</li>
 <li><strong>Edge cases</strong>: Rows 2 (2015-11) and 6 (2021-06) involve parties in atypical positions (MP partially opposing own government; V at break point with Löfven II). Treated as opposition-side filings.</li>
@@ -8261,6 +8261,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Confidence on headline baseline claims</strong>: 🟩 HIGH · <strong>Reviewer</strong>: please flag any inter-period comparability concerns (committee reorganisations, rule changes) for the next revision.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -8303,7 +8326,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:07.836Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:29.263Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html b/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html
index 49127e8dbd..cb3cfe2ac2 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.230Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:29.645Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.230Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:29.645Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:08.230Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Opposition Motions (April 14–17, 2026)","description":"Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 21 coordinated counter-motions against the government's spring legislative package — the most…","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:29.645Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md","name":"documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md","name":"historical-baseline.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -229,10 +229,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Audience</strong></td><td>Editors-in-chief · political advisors · party whips · newsroom planners</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reading time</strong></td><td>3 minutes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classification</strong></td><td>Public</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 Sweden's four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed <strong>21 coordinated counter-motions</strong> against the government's spring legislative package — the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive of the 2025/26 riksmöte</strong>. The <strong>headline finding</strong> is a historically rare <strong>four-party convergence on a single proposition</strong> (prop. 2025/26:229, <em>New Reception Law</em>) within 72 hours, with each party filing a distinct but mutually reinforcing frame. This establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--three-things-to-know"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-things-to-know"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>This is campaign-narrative construction, not coalition rehearsal.</strong> ACH analysis assigns P=0.50 to the campaign-narrative hypothesis vs P=0.35 to coalition-rehearsal. The opposition is locking in timestamped talking points before the summer recess, not preparing to govern.</p>
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--three-things-to-know">🎯 Three Things to Know<a class="" aria-hidd
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Clusters, Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--four-clusters-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Four Cluster
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th>Parties</th><th>Watch Out For</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td><strong>Reception Law (4-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande Q2 2026; L backbench sympathy for C's phased amendment</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td><strong>Deportation (3-party)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>V, C, MP (not S)</td><td>C's statutory proportionality test converges with European mainstream — realistic SfU amendment path</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>S, MP</td><td>Only Germany 2022 Tankrabatt is direct precedent — did not extend. Klimatlagen §5 accountability trigger.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 4</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td>V, MP</td><td>Post-NATO positioning; MP's end-user review language aligns with Norway/Netherlands/Germany — mainstream, not outlier</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Probabilities (from <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--scenario-probabilities-from-scenario-analysismd">🎯 Scenario Proba
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">Probability</th><th>Opposition outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>🟢 BASE — Government retained, all 4 propositions enacted</td><td align="center"><strong>0.45</strong></td><td>Campaign material only; no reversal within electoral horizon</td></tr><tr><td>🔵 BULL — S-led minority, reception-law partial reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.22</strong></td><td>Partial win: reception + fuel tax reversed; deportation retained</td></tr><tr><td>🔴 BEAR (for government) — S+V+MP+C majority, full reversal</td><td align="center"><strong>0.10</strong></td><td>Full package reversed; C's HD024095 language adopted statutorily</td></tr><tr><td>⚡ WILDCARD — Inconclusive election / snap re-election</td><td align="center"><strong>0.05</strong></td><td>Motion package becomes amendment-by-amendment negotiation currency</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Closely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-three-risks-to-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-three-risks-to-monitor-closely">🛡️ Three Risks to Monitor Cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Why it matters</th><th>Update signal</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>R01</strong> Polarisation lock-in (L×I=25)</td><td>Government has 62% voter support floor on immigration; opposition narrative capped below that floor</td><td>Novus monthly migration-salience polling</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R08</strong> Unemployment context (L×I=16)</td><td>8.69% unemployment 2025 amplifies anti-immigration framing</td><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB, May 2026)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>R07</strong> C as pivot party (L×I=12)</td><td>C's HD024095 proportionality amendment could break 4-party front if negotiated</td><td>C leader public statement on SfU amendment posture</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Signal</th><th>What to prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td>Amendment-vote sequencing guidance</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C leader public statement on HD024095</td><td>Updated risk R07 scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union statement on fuel tax</td><td>Rural-voter risk R03 update</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235</td><td>Full cluster scoring update</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>BASE / BULL / BEAR scenario Bayesian update</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Recommended Newsroom Framings (Verified Evidence-Based)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-recommended-newsroom-framings-verified-evidence-based">🎙️ Re
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Backed by</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Four opposition parties file coordinated counter-motions against immigration package — historically rare"</td><td>Dok_ids HD024076/80/87/89 within 72 h</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"S's anti-privatisation stance on asylum housing aligns with Nordic peer practice — Sweden is the outlier"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §1</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"C's proportionality amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland statutory practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §2</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt — the only peer precedent for Sweden's fuel-tax cut — was not extended"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>"MP's arms-export end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, post-2021 German practice"</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually Weak)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framings-to-avoid-factually-weak"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>❌ "Opposition is coalition-ready for post-2026 government" — ACH P=0.35 only; Red-Team critique applies</li>
 <li>❌ "Four-party coordination means S+V+MP+C majority is likely after election" — BEAR scenario P=0.10</li>
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--framings-to-avoid-factually-weak">❌ Framings to Avoid (Factually W
 <li>❌ "Fuel-tax opposition is anti-working-class" — S's HD024082 is a <em>return-with-new-proposal</em> motion, not a cost-of-living rejection</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--deeper-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deeper-reading"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Full ACH + Red-Team + cross-cluster interference</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — 4-party division of labour</li>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--deeper-reading">🔗 Deeper Reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -493,38 +493,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-21 13:10 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Significance</strong></td><td>9.0/10 (Raw) · <strong>9.40 DIW-weighted</strong> on LEAD cluster</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publication Decision</strong></td><td>PUBLISH IMMEDIATELY</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority</strong></td><td><strong>P1</strong> (electoral/policy decisive)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Quality Tier</strong></td><td>🏆 <strong>REFERENCE EXEMPLAR</strong> for opposition-motion analysis</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Next Review</strong></td><td>2026-04-27</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1">🧭 BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-13 and 2026-04-17 the Swedish opposition filed <strong>21 motions</strong> concentrated in <strong>four coordinated clusters</strong>. The April 2026 wave is the <strong>most programmatically coordinated opposition offensive</strong> of the 2025/26 riksmöte and establishes the <strong>twin-pillar campaign architecture</strong> (humanitarian immigration + climate credibility) that the opposition will carry into the September 2026 election. Four of the clusters cross filing-time thresholds that constitute <em>prima facie</em> evidence of coordination: the reception-law cluster sees <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions to a single proposition within <strong>72 hours</strong> — historically rare and the headline finding of this dossier. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p>The dominant strategic-logic hypothesis (ACH: P=0.50) is <strong>campaign-narrative construction</strong> rather than coalition-rehearsal or opportunistic signalling. The opposition is using the final pre-election Riksdag cycle to <strong>lock in timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer recess. This distinguishes the April 2026 wave from prior clusters. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Twenty-one opposition motions filed between April 13–17, 2026 represent the most coordinated parliamentary opposition offensive in the current riksmöte. In an historically rare manoeuvre, all four major opposition parties — <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong>, <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong>, <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong>, and <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> — simultaneously filed counter-motions against the government's flagship immigration legislation package, signalling that immigration policy will be the defining battleground of Sweden's September 2026 election.</p>
 <p>The motions target three simultaneous government propositions on immigration (prop. 2025/26:229, 2025/26:235, and 2025/26:215) while also challenging the government's environmentally inconsistent fuel tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236), arms export expansion (prop. 2025/26:228), and healthcare and justice reforms. Sweden's deteriorating economic context — with unemployment rising to 8.69% in 2025 and GDP growth slowing to 0.82% in 2024 — frames a policy environment in which the government has electoral advantage on immigration but exposure on climate credibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance">📊 Key Findings (Ranked by DIW-Weighted Significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings-ranked-by-diw-weighted-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead">Finding 1 — Unprecedented 4-Party Reception-Law Coordination (DIW 9.4/10) 🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1--unprecedented-4-party-reception-law-coordination-diw-9410-️-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed counter-motions to prop. 2025/26:229 (New Reception Law) within a 72-hour window. <strong>Dok_ids</strong>: HD024076 (V, Tony Haddou), HD024080 (S, Ida Karkiainen), HD024087 (MP, Annika Hirvonen), HD024089 (C, Niels Paarup-Petersen). The filings are a <strong>deliberate division of labour</strong>: V stakes the principled-left position, S anchors welfare-state protection (anti-privatisation), MP internationalises via EU Pact compatibility, C occupies pragmatist-centrist ground with a phased amendment.</p>
 <p>The absence of a joint press conference is strategic: <strong>claimed coordination would attract "coalition of chaos" framing</strong>, whereas parallel messaging projects discipline without vulnerability. Analytically, the division-of-labour pattern survives every available attack vector — a Tidö-aligned attack on V's frame fails against C; an attack on C fails against S. <strong>This is defence-in-depth messaging</strong>, a hallmark of mature opposition tradecraft. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead">Finding 2 — Triple Immigration Pressure: Reception + Deportation + Housing (DIW 8.8/10) 🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2--triple-immigration-pressure-reception--deportation--housing-diw-8810--co-lead"></a></h4>
 <p>Beyond reception, three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:235 (stricter deportation — V outright rejection HD024090, C proportionality amendment HD024095, MP partial rejection HD024097) and three parties challenged prop. 2025/26:215 (time-limited housing — V HD024077, S HD024079, MP HD024086). Total immigration motions: <strong>10 of 21 (48%)</strong> — the opposition has made immigration its primary electoral narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>New analytic observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>S is silent on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) while filing on every other immigration track. This is a <strong>revealed strategic choice</strong>: S has concluded that deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party in the current public-opinion environment (70%+ support deportation of convicted foreigners per SOM 2025). The silence signals S's 2026 campaign architecture — <strong>own the economic-welfare immigration narrative, avoid the security-enforcement narrative</strong>. This materially changes post-election coalition calculus: S is not a reliable ECHR-litigation partner post-adoption.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-">Finding 3 — Government Climate Hypocrisy Narrative: Fuel Tax (DIW 8.2/10) 🥉<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3--government-climate-hypocrisy-narrative-fuel-tax-diw-8210-"></a></h4>
 <p>S (HD024082, Mikael Damberg) and MP (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson) both oppose the fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. With Sweden's GDP growth at only 0.82% (2024) and 2023 at –0.2%, the government's choice to cut fuel taxes in a supplementary budget creates a credibility gap on climate.</p>
 <p><strong>Quantified climate impact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cut is estimated to add <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> to a 2030 trajectory Sweden is already ~20% behind (Naturvårdsverket 2025). Under Klimatlagen 2017:720 §5, the government must explain incompatibility to parliament — this creates a statutory basis for ongoing challenge by Klimatpolitiska rådet. MP's HD024098 anchors this claim.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative precedent <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut — and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> due to poor electoral payoff.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §3</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-">Finding 4 — Arms Export: V+MP Post-NATO Signalling (DIW 7.5/10) 🔶<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4--arms-export-vmp-post-nato-signalling-diw-7510-"></a></h4>
 <p>V (HD024091, Håkan Svenneling) and MP (HD024096, Jacob Risberg) both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation modernization. V's motion explicitly requests rejection of the entire proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports including follow-up deliveries to human rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-NATO context <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024. Public opinion on arms exports has shifted to 58/32/10 favourable (SOM 2025) from 45/45/10 (2021). The cluster is therefore <strong>low electoral consequence but high post-election negotiation value</strong>: if any 2026–2030 government configuration requires V or MP support, HD024091/96 positions become immediate coalition constraints. MP's end-user review language (HD024096) is aligned with Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice — <strong>mainstream Northern European, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 <p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> §4</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810">Finding 5 — Unusual S+V+C Healthcare Coalition (DIW 6.8/10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-5--unusual-svc-healthcare-coalition-diw-6810"></a></h4>
 <p>Three ideologically diverse parties (S HD024081, V HD024083, C HD024094) reject prop. 2025/26:216 on medical competence in municipal healthcare. C's opposition is the most striking given its centre-right profile — the party argues the reform reduces municipal flexibility and should be redesigned.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-2026 coalition signal <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: S+V+C convergence on healthcare governance is a rehearsal for a potential post-election minority-government working relationship. Coupled with C's amendment position on deportation (HD024095), this is the strongest coalition-rehearsal signal in the cluster.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — Devil's Advocate Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Counter-hypothesis</strong>: What if the entire cluster has negligible strategic value?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-red-team-box--devils-advocate-critique">⚔️ Red-Team Box — D
 <p><strong>Red-Team posterior</strong>: The cluster's expected value is <strong>tactical (talking-points, media cycle control)</strong> rather than <strong>strategic (coalition-rehearsal, government-formation preparation)</strong>. The dossier's findings remain valid but the <strong>political-consequence magnitude should be calibrated down</strong>: this is a good campaign input, not a realignment event.</p>
 <p><strong>Integration with main analysis</strong>: We accept the Red-Team critique at 30% weight. It modifies the narrative — this is <strong>the best-coordinated tactical opposition offensive of the riksmöte</strong>, but it is not a strategic re-alignment. See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5 for the scenario-tree consequences.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-interference-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>When the dossier covers multiple policy clusters (here: immigration, climate/fiscal, defence, healthcare), rhetorical interference between clusters creates exploitable vectors.</p>
 
 
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-cluster-interference-analysis">🔀 Cross-Cluster Interference
 <p><strong>Critical finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>"V universal rejectionist"</strong> frame (rows 1, 6) is V's single largest electoral vulnerability. V must sequence its rhetoric to pair rejection with concrete alternatives (e.g., border-capacity investment, Ukraine-lethal-aid affirmation) or lose 1–2 polling points to SD attack ads. V's HD024076, HD024090, and HD024091 texts currently all lead with principled-rejection language; SD will highlight this uniformity.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach--three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--ach--three-competing-hypotheses">🎯 ACH — Three Competing Hypoth
 <p>Full ACH analysis: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §1</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--election-2026-implications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-election-2026-implications">⚡ Election 2026 Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-implications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessment (DIW-calibrated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-assessment-diw-calibrated">Electoral Impact Assessme
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Electoral Impact</td><td>Immigration becomes binary-choice election — government "border security" vs opposition "humanitarian alternative"</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition Scenarios</td><td>Current M/SD/KD/L majority retained P=0.50; S-led minority P=0.33; S+V+MP+C majority P=0.12</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Voter Salience</td><td>62% of Swedes support stricter immigration — government has current polling advantage</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Campaign Vulnerability</td><td>Government exposed on climate (fuel tax) and healthcare (3-party opposition)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Policy Legacy</td><td>If government wins 2026, all four propositions become law and define a decade</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster Value to Opposition</td><td>Tactical (talking points) ≫ Strategic (coalition rehearsal)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (Red-Team adjusted)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government will pass all four immigration+fiscal propositions (prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Immigration will be #1 election issue in 2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax opposition will provide opposition climate narrative</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>C will negotiate on deportation proportionality in SfU</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>S will file follow-on motion on 2026–2027 deportation legislation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM (P≈0.55)</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition forms alternative majority after 2026</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW (P=0.12)</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR issues pilot-judgment vs Sweden within 5 years post-adoption of 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-watch-window-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--14-day-watch-window-1">📣 14-Day Watch Window<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Timing</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Updates which analysis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>SfU rapporteur selection (prop. 2025/26:229)</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> RR1</td></tr><tr><td>Within 14 days</td><td>C-leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> DR4</td></tr><tr><td>Within 21 days</td><td>Transport union public position (Transportarbetareförbundet) on fuel tax</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> FR4</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Reception RR2, scenario BULL prior</td></tr><tr><td>Q2 2026</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Deportation DR5, scenario prior</td></tr><tr><td>May–June 2026</td><td>SfU/FiU/UU chamber votes</td><td>All clusters — locks in BASE scenario</td></tr><tr><td>Rolling</td><td>Novus immigration-salience polling</td><td>Cross-cluster political-consequence magnitude</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>:
 "Four Opposition Parties Unite Against Sweden's Immigration Package in Unprecedented Parliamentary Challenge"</p>
 <p><strong>Alternative Title (EN)</strong>:
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">🏆 AI-Recommended Article Metadat
 <p><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>:
 "S, V, MP och C lämnar samordnade motioner mot tre invandringspropositioner medan Socialdemokraterna också utmanar regeringens sänkning av bränsleskatten inför 2026 års val."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-file-index-updated"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analysis-file-index-updated">🔗 Analysis File Index (Updated)<a cl
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27 · <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> v5.1 + DIW v1.0</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) multiplier applied per-cluster based on legislative axis (constitutional / electoral / policy / fiscal / international); (2) per-dimension sensitivity analysis ±10%; (3) confidence-weighted ranking.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DIW-Weighted<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-ranking--diw-weighted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-ranking--diw-weighted">🏆 Significance Ranking — DI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>Dok_id(s)</th><th>Topic</th><th align="center">Raw</th><th align="center">DIW mult.</th><th align="center"><strong>DIW score</strong></th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Electoral</th><th align="center">Coalition risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">🏛️ 1</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89</td><td><strong>New Reception Law</strong> — 4-party</td><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">×0.94</td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥈 2</td><td>HD024090/95/97</td><td><strong>Stricter Deportation</strong> — 3-party</td><td align="center">9.0</td><td align="center">×0.98</td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🥉 3</td><td>HD024077/79/86</td><td>Time-Limited Housing — 3-party</td><td align="center">8.8</td><td align="center">×0.93</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>HD024082/98</td><td><strong>Fuel Tax Cut</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">8.3</td><td align="center">×0.99</td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">LOW (gov wins)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>HD024091/96</td><td><strong>Arms Export</strong> — 2-party</td><td align="center">7.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>HD024078/84/85</td><td>Crime-Victim Compensation</td><td align="center">7.2</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>7.00</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>HD024081/83/94</td><td>Municipal Healthcare Competence</td><td align="center">7.0</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>6.80</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>HD024088</td><td>Consumer Credit Law</td><td align="center">5.7</td><td align="center">×0.97</td><td align="center"><strong>5.50</strong></td><td align="center">🟧 MED</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact Weight) Methodology v1.0<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10"></a></h3>
 <p>Raw significance × DIW multiplier = DIW-weighted significance. DIW reflects <strong>how much the legislative axis changes the political-system reality</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -1114,8 +1114,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-domain-impact-weight-methodology-v10">📊 DIW (Domain-Impact We
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Multiplier</th><th>Reasoning</th><th>Applied clusters</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional</td><td align="center">1.00</td><td>Highest; alters state powers / rights</td><td>— (none in this cluster set)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral-definitional</strong></td><td align="center">0.98</td><td>Defines a campaign narrative that shapes voter choice</td><td>Deportation (×0.98)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Policy-defining</strong></td><td align="center">0.94</td><td>Establishes policy architecture persistent ≥ 2 legislative cycles</td><td>Reception (×0.94)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fiscal / climate</strong></td><td align="center">0.99</td><td>Near-full weight; immediate budget + climate-trajectory effects</td><td>Fuel tax (×0.99)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International / defence-industrial</strong></td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>High but conditional on coalition formation</td><td>Arms export (×0.97)</td></tr><tr><td>Social-policy adjustment</td><td align="center">0.93</td><td>Significant but narrower policy scope</td><td>Housing (×0.93)</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory / sectoral</td><td align="center">0.97</td><td>Narrow; affects specific sector only</td><td>Consumer credit (×0.97)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Why DIW matters</strong>: Raw scoring treats all 10-point policy impacts identically. DIW discounts narrower-scope reforms while preserving the full weight of electoral-definitional ones. The result is a <strong>ranking that reflects decision-consequence for the 2026 election</strong>, not merely policy novelty.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster">📐 Per-Dimension Scoring Breakdown (LEAD Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-dimension-scoring-breakdown-lead-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) — HD024076/80/87/89<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-reception-law-prop-202526229--hd024076808789">🏛️ Reception L
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Replaces 1994 reception act; introduces private-operator clauses + duty architecture</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>4-party filing within 72 h — unprecedented in current riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Immigration #1 issue in Novus Q1 2026; 62% voter stricter-immigration support</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Virtually guaranteed front-page story in SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome Likelihood</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Government majority; opposition cannot defeat but can amend (C's proportionality)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>10.0/10</strong></td><td>Mean across dimensions (normalised to 10)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.40</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.94 (policy-defining axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Deportation (prop. 2025/26:235) — HD024090/95/97<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--stricter-deportation-prop-202526235--hd0240909597">🥈 Stricter Dep
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Expands deportation criteria significantly; ECHR proportionality concerns</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>3-party (V+C+MP); <strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Deportation is SD's flagship issue; government-advantage terrain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Tabloid-friendly; C's proportionality amendment drives nuance coverage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">7/10</td><td>Government majority; C amendment realistic path via L backbench</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>9.0/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.80</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.98 (electoral-definitional axis)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 2025/26:236) — HD024082/98<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--fuel-tax-cut-prop-202526236--hd02408298">🥉 Fuel Tax Cut (prop. 20
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy Impact</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Budget-line impact; ~0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year trajectory impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cross-Party Coordination</strong></td><td align="center">6/10</td><td>2-party (S+MP); V notably absent</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral Salience</strong></td><td align="center">9/10</td><td>Cost-of-living 74% Novus Q1 2026 priority</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media Attention</strong></td><td align="center">8/10</td><td>Regional media angle (Norrland rural split)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksdag Outcome</strong></td><td align="center">10/10</td><td>Extra-budget fast-track; definitional government outcome</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.3/10</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Score</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>8.20</strong></td><td>Raw × 0.99 (fiscal/climate axis — near-full weight)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivity Analysis (±10% dimension weight stress-test)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1310,8 +1310,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--sensitivity-analysis-10-dimension-weight-stress-test">🎯 Sensitivi
 <p><strong>Sensitivity verdict <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The LEAD story (reception law) is robust against all tested perturbations. Ranks 3–4 (fuel tax / housing) are tied within uncertainty bands — either could be elevated with minor coordination evidence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-story-decision"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-story-decision">🎯 Top Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-story-decision"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW 9.40)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this leads</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Historical rarity</strong> — 4-party coordination on single proposition within 72 h is unprecedented in current riksmöte</li>
@@ -1319,14 +1319,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-lead-reception-law-cluster-diw-940">Lead: Reception Law Cluster (DIW
 <li><strong>Policy impact</strong> — replaces a 31-year-old reception act with new architecture</li>
 <li><strong>Division-of-labour messaging</strong> — each party occupies distinct rhetorical space, defence-in-depth narrative</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880">Co-lead: Deportation Cluster (DIW 8.80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-co-lead-deportation-cluster-diw-880"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why this co-leads despite lower raw</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Electoral-definitional axis</strong> (DIW ×0.98) — nearly full weight</li>
 <li><strong>S-silence is analytically revealing</strong> — a rare case where <strong>absence</strong> of evidence is primary evidence</li>
 <li><strong>C's statutory proportionality amendment is the most legally-workable opposition motion</strong> in the entire wave</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW 8.20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Why secondary</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Climate-fiscal contradiction</strong> provides the opposition's strongest government-credibility attack</li>
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-secondary-fuel-tax-cluster-diw-820">Secondary: Fuel Tax Cluster (DIW
 <li>Narrative carries cleanly into summer 2026 European Parliament Fit-for-55 review cycle</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata-1">📈 AI-Recommended Article Metad
 <p><strong>Article decision</strong>: PUBLISH — CRITICAL political intelligence
 <strong>Article priority</strong>: <strong>P1</strong> (Immediate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — BLUF builds from LEAD cluster</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — scenario priors use DIW-weighted ranks</li>
@@ -1388,17 +1388,17 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:07 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overview">Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis provides deep stakeholder perspective assessments for the 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026, with special focus on the immigration cluster (10 motions), fuel tax/climate cluster (2 motions), and arms export cluster (2 motions).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1--citizens">1. 👥 Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1--citizens"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary concerns</strong>: Cost of living, housing, employment security, public safety
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: HIGH — immigration, fuel costs, healthcare all directly affect citizens</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-citizen-segments-affected"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Rural Swedes</strong> (fuel tax): Government's fuel tax cut benefits rural citizens who depend on cars. S's opposition (HD024082) risks alienating this group. Approximately 30% of Swedish workforce commutes by car in rural areas.</li>
 <li><strong>Welfare-dependent citizens</strong> (reception law): The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) affects S's and MP's core voter base — those who believe in comprehensive public services for asylum seekers.</li>
@@ -1407,10 +1407,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-citizen-segments-affected">Key citizen segments affected:<a class
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — citizen polling data consistently shows immigration as #1 concern</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. 🏛️ Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-️-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Will pass all three immigration propositions plus extra budget
 <strong>Motivation</strong>: Tidö agreement mandate + electoral positioning for 2026</p>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-dynamics"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Moderaterna (M)</strong>: Supports all three immigration propositions as part of Tidö agreement. Welcomes the opposition's unified rejection — it confirms M's electoral thesis that only the right-of-centre coalition will enforce Sweden's borders.</li>
 <li><strong>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</strong>: Strongly supports stricter deportation (HD024090/95/97 motivate their base by showing "the establishment is defending criminals"). New reception law validates SD's decade-long campaign.</li>
@@ -1419,9 +1419,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-coalition-dynamics">Coalition dynamics:<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — coalition voting patterns are predictable</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc">3. ⚡ Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3--opposition-bloc-svmpc"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Position</strong>: Coordinated challenge on immigration, fiscal, and defense policy</p>
-<h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> — 6 motions (HD024079/80/82/84/78/81):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Magdalena Andersson's S is pursuing a two-track strategy: (1) accepting some security reform (not opposing deportation outright) while (2) protecting welfare state principles (anti-privatization in HD024080, integration investment in HD024079)</li>
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-party-by-party-strategic-analysis">Party-by-party strategic analysis:
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4--businessindustry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sectors affected</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Transport/Logistics</strong>: Opposes S+MP fuel tax position; benefits from government's fuel tax cut</li>
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4--businessindustry">4. 💼 Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Key conflict</strong>: Transport industry backs government on fuel tax; financial sector cautiously supports C on consumer credit amendment. The business community is fragmented on these motions, with no unified position.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5--civil-society"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Organizations most vocal</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong>: Opposes prop. 2025/26:229 (new reception law) — supports S, V, MP, C counter-motions</li>
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5--civil-society">5. 🌿 Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Civil society is the most organized constituency supporting opposition motions</strong> on immigration.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6--internationaleu"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>EU Commission concerns</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>The new reception law (prop. 2025/26:229) must comply with EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024)</li>
@@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6--internationaleu">6. 🌍 International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — EU enforcement timeline is long; NATO pressure is real but informal</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional dimensions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Proportionality in deportation</strong>: C's HD024095 is legally robust — "systematic repeated offenses over time" aligns with ECHR Article 8. If the government ignores this, administrative courts may strike down individual deportation orders.</li>
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-️-judiciaryconstitutional">7. ⚖️ Judiciary/Constitutional<a c
 <p><strong>Lagrådet</strong> (Council on Legislation) has been consulted on all three immigration propositions. Opposition motions reflect areas where Lagrådet expressed reservations.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — constitutional review bodies have long timelines</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8--mediapublic-opinion"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Dominant media narrative</strong> (expected coverage):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SVT Nyheter</strong>: "Fyra partier mot ny mottagandelag" (Four parties against new reception law) — likely to be front-page story</li>
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8--mediapublic-opinion">8. 📰 Media/Public Opinion<a class="" aria-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — Swedish media behavior on immigration stories is well-established</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Supports["Supports Opposition Motions"]
         CS[Civil Society 🌿&#x3C;br/>Strong support]
@@ -1543,9 +1543,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--stakeholder-impact-summary">📊 Stakeholder Impact Summary<a class=
     style GOV fill:#dc3545,color:#fff
     style OPP fill:#007bff,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked">🎭 Named-Actors Registry (≥20 actors tracked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-registry-20-actors-tracked"></a></h3>
 <p>Actors tracked to establish accountability, enable follow-up, and support the influence-network analysis below. Listing is grouped by role category.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamentary — Opposition (motion signatories)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--opposition-motion-signatories">🏛️ Parliamenta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key motion(s)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>Magdalena Andersson</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>Ida Karkiainen</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024080</td><td>Reception privatisation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>Ardalan Shekarabi</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024079</td><td>Time-limited housing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>Mikael Damberg</strong></td><td align="center">S</td><td>Lead signatory HD024082</td><td>Fuel-tax fiscal framing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Nooshi Dadgostar</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Party leader</td><td>Cluster sponsor</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tony Haddou</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024076</td><td>Reception rights frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>Håkan Svenneling</strong></td><td align="center">V</td><td>Lead signatory HD024091</td><td>Arms-export rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td><strong>Janine Alm Ericson</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Party leader + HD024098</td><td>Fuel-tax climate frame</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td><strong>Annika Hirvonen</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024087</td><td>EU Pact compatibility</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td><strong>Jacob Risberg</strong></td><td align="center">MP</td><td>Lead signatory HD024096</td><td>Arms end-user review</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td><strong>Niels Paarup-Petersen</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Lead signatory HD024089/95</td><td>Phased amendment + proportionality</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td><strong>Martin Ådahl</strong></td><td align="center">C</td><td>Economic-policy spokesperson</td><td>HD024088 consumer credit</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary — Government / Tidö coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-parliamentary--government--tidö-coalition">🏛️ Parliamentary
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th align="center">Party</th><th>Role</th><th>Key decision point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">13</td><td><strong>Ulf Kristersson</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Prime Minister</td><td>Government-wide messaging discipline</td></tr><tr><td align="center">14</td><td><strong>Jimmie Åkesson</strong></td><td align="center">SD</td><td>Tidö signatory</td><td>SD attack-ad strategy owner</td></tr><tr><td align="center">15</td><td><strong>Ebba Busch</strong></td><td align="center">KD</td><td>Deputy PM</td><td>Crime-victim / parent-liability tension</td></tr><tr><td align="center">16</td><td><strong>Johan Pehrson</strong></td><td align="center">L</td><td>Tidö party leader</td><td><strong>🔶 Weak link</strong> — rule-of-law sensitivity on proportionality</td></tr><tr><td align="center">17</td><td><strong>Maria Malmer Stenergard</strong></td><td align="center">M</td><td>Migration minister</td><td>Reception-law defence + SfU engagement</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judiciary--legal-oversight"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-️-judiciary--legal-oversight">⚖️ Judiciary / Legal oversight<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Institution</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">18</td><td><strong>Lagrådet</strong></td><td>Council on Legislation</td><td>Yttrande on 2025/26:229 + 2025/26:235 (Q2 2026) — single most consequential pending signal</td></tr><tr><td align="center">19</td><td><strong>Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)</strong></td><td>Riksdag committee</td><td>Potential constitutional review</td></tr><tr><td align="center">20</td><td><strong>Migrationsöverdomstolen</strong></td><td>Migration Court of Appeal</td><td>Post-adoption administrative review venue</td></tr><tr><td align="center">21</td><td><strong>ECtHR (Strasbourg)</strong></td><td>European Court of Human Rights</td><td>3–5 year pilot-judgment potential on deportation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-civil-society--ngo-network"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--civil-society--ngo-network">🌿 Civil-society &#x26; NGO network<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role in this cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">22</td><td><strong>Röda Korset Sverige</strong></td><td>Joint remissvar on prop. 2025/26:229 expected</td></tr><tr><td align="center">23</td><td><strong>Rädda Barnen</strong></td><td>Child-welfare concerns on private-operator reception</td></tr><tr><td align="center">24</td><td><strong>Amnesty Sverige</strong></td><td>Critical brief on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">25</td><td><strong>Caritas Sverige</strong></td><td>Reception-law humanitarian coalition</td></tr><tr><td align="center">26</td><td><strong>RFSL</strong></td><td>LGBTQ-asylum deportation concerns</td></tr><tr><td align="center">27</td><td><strong>Diakonia</strong></td><td>Arms-export human-rights advocacy</td></tr><tr><td align="center">28</td><td><strong>Svenska Freds- och Skiljedomsföreningen</strong></td><td>Arms-export policy critique</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business--industry"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--business--industry">💼 Business / industry<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Sector</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">29</td><td><strong>Saab AB (Linköping ~15k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Quiet pro-2025/26:228 lobbying; opposes V+MP cluster</td></tr><tr><td align="center">30</td><td><strong>BAE Systems Sweden (Karlskoga ~8k jobs)</strong></td><td>Defence</td><td>Aligned with Saab on export flexibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center">31</td><td><strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong></td><td>Labour union</td><td><strong>🔶 Split risk</strong> — may publicly back government fuel-tax cut</td></tr><tr><td align="center">32</td><td><strong>Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR)</strong></td><td>Municipal association</td><td>Concerned about reception-law municipal-capacity burden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expert--oversight-bodies"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--expert--oversight-bodies">📊 Expert / oversight bodies<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">33</td><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet</strong></td><td>Annual Klimatlagen §5 accountability report — key fuel-tax lever</td></tr><tr><td align="center">34</td><td><strong>MSB (Myndigheten för samhällsskydd)</strong></td><td>Disinformation / CIB monitoring</td></tr><tr><td align="center">35</td><td><strong>FOI (Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut)</strong></td><td>Foreign-influence analysis</td></tr><tr><td align="center">36</td><td><strong>ISP (Inspektionen för strategiska produkter)</strong></td><td>Arms-export authorisation authority</td></tr><tr><td align="center">37</td><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket</strong></td><td>Climate-trajectory evidence base</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Actors tracked</strong>: 37 (minimum threshold: 20). ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph OppLeaders["Opposition Leaders"]
         MA["Magdalena Andersson S"]
@@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-influence-network-cluster-level">🕸️ Influence Network (Clust
 <p><strong>Influence-network reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The key <strong>bridging nodes</strong> are (1) Paarup-Petersen's amendment path to Pehrson (L backbench) — the only opposition → Tidö bridge; (2) <strong>Lagrådet</strong> as the single institutional actor with power to change the government's substantive terms; (3) <strong>Transportarbetareförbundet</strong> as the split-risk node that could fragment S's working-class narrative on fuel tax. These three nodes deserve disproportionate monitoring effort.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--fracture-probability-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fracture-probability-tree"></a></h3>
 <p>Where can the opposition coalition fracture, and with what probability?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 Opposition coalition holds&#x3C;br/>through June 2026 chamber votes"]
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--fracture-probability-tree">🧨 Fracture-Probability Tree<a class=""
 <p><strong>Highest-probability fracture <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>F5</strong> (SD attack ads force V rejectionism revision). Opposition must execute <strong>M5</strong> (V pairs rejection with concrete alternative) as matter of priority. Next-highest: <strong>F1</strong> (C negotiates). Mitigation <strong>M1</strong> (amendment-first sequencing) addresses both F1 and F3 simultaneously — single highest-leverage move.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Cross-Cluster Interference — influence patterns</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> §TOWS — stakeholder-informed strategy derivations</li>
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-1">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2037,7 +2037,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Structured alternative-futures reasoning to stress-test the dominant narrative ("opposition coordination builds toward 2026 electoral gain"), surface wildcards, and assign prior probabilities that can be updated as forward indicators fire.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: Three Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <p>Applied to the central question: <em>What is the strategic logic of the April 14–17 opposition-motion wave?</em></p>
 
 
@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-1--ach-three-competing-hypotheses">🧭 Section 1 — ACH: T
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: The opposition's goal is not to prepare for government (too early, polls insufficient) but to <strong>lock in 2026 campaign narratives</strong> before the Riksdag recesses in summer 2026. Motions function as <strong>timestamped talking points</strong> that survive the summer silence.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2 — Master Scenario Tree (Short → Medium → Long)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     T0["🟡 Now&#x3C;br/>2026-04-20&#x3C;br/>Cluster filed"]
 
@@ -2132,8 +2132,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-2--master-scenario-tree-short--medium--long">🧭 Section 2
 <p>Probabilities are <strong>analyst priors</strong>, zero-sum within each branch. They update as Lagrådet yttranden, polling data, and SfU rapporteur reports arrive.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--scenario-narratives">🧭 Section 3 — Scenario Narratives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--scenario-narratives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government Reforms Enacted" (P = 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: SfU/FiU/UU straight-reject opposition motions in May–June; government retains majority in September; all four propositions become law; opposition runs them as 2026–2030 campaign material but cannot reverse them.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BASE:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--base--government-reforms-enacted-p--045">🟢 BASE — "Government R
 <li>Reputational: moderate (climate, possible ECtHR adverse deportation judgment)</li>
 <li>Electoral: favourable to government until 2030</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BULL — "S-Led Minority, Partial Reception-Law Reversal" (P = 0.22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S-led minority with MP support (±V) but not C; reception-law partial reversal via amendment in Q1 2027. Deportation law retained (S silence locks in). Fuel tax cut reversed. Arms export framework unchanged.</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BULL:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bull--s-led-minority-partial-reception-law-reversal-p--022">🔵 BUL
 <li>MP achieves symbolic but not decisive influence</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Partial victory for opposition narrative</strong>: reception and fuel tax reversed; deportation and arms retained.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Government — "Full Reversal Package" (P = 0.10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces S+V+MP+C 175+ majority; full reversal of reception law, fuel tax, and partial reversal of deportation via statutory proportionality test (HD024095 adopted).</p>
 <p><strong>Key forward signals confirming BEAR-for-government:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--bear-for-government--full-reversal-package-p--010">🔴 BEAR-for-Gov
 <li>Sweden climate 2030 target back within plausible range</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Low-probability but high-impact</strong>: requires simultaneous Tidö collapse and opposition discipline — historically rare.</p>
-<h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "Minority-Government Volatility" (P = 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Setup</strong>: Election produces no 175+ majority configuration; months of negotiation; eventual minority government with no clear mandate. Motions cluster becomes <strong>negotiation currency</strong> rather than governing programme.</p>
 <p><strong>Consequences:</strong></p>
 <ul>
@@ -2200,7 +2200,7 @@ <h3 id="rm--wildcard--minority-government-volatility-p--005">⚡ WILDCARD — "M
 <li>Political system instability with 1-2 year horizon for re-election</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭 Section 4 — Scenario-Specific Intelligence Products to Prepare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-4--scenario-specific-intelligence-products-to-prepare">🧭
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Opposition should prepare</th><th>Government should prepare</th><th>Newsroom should prepare</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BASE</td><td>2026–2030 campaign narrative; post-adoption litigation strategy; NGO alliance</td><td>Implementation plan; defensive communications</td><td>Multi-year implementation tracker</td></tr><tr><td>BULL</td><td>Reception-law repeal legislation; coalition-agreement provisions</td><td>Damage-control communications; alternative legislation</td><td>S-leader interview series; legal-analysis series</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR</td><td>Full reversal legislation; new Reception Act drafting; statutory proportionality text</td><td>Post-loss narrative; policy-continuity carve-outs</td><td>Election-reversal analysis; comparative restoration precedents</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD</td><td>Amendment-by-amendment playbook</td><td>Holding-pattern communications</td><td>Minority-government instability explainer</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--red-team-critique"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate</strong>: What if the entire cluster is strategically irrelevant?</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--red-team-critique">🧭 Section 5 — Red-Team Critique<a
 <p><strong>Integration</strong>: This Red-Team critique reduces the BASE scenario's political-consequence magnitude, not its probability. The overall scenario tree remains valid; the expected utility to the opposition shrinks.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--bayesian-update-rules"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--bayesian-update-rules">🧭 Section 6 — Bayesian Update
 <p><strong>Update procedure</strong>: Re-score scenario tree when any of these signals fire. If posteriors shift the BASE/BULL/BEAR ranking, update <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>executive-brief.md</code> accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — Cross-Cluster Scenario Dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph EarlyNegotiation["Early Negotiation (May-June 2026)"]
         SfU["SfU votes&#x3C;br/>(Reception + Deportation + Housing)"]
@@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--cross-cluster-scenario-dependencies">🧭 Section 7 — C
     style Implementation fill:#1565C0,color:#FFF
     style Reversal fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — Analyst Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-8--analyst-confidence-self-assessment">🧭 Section 8 — An
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H2 (campaign-narrative) as dominant hypothesis</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Fits evidence pattern; disconfirms available for H1/H3</td></tr><tr><td>BASE scenario probability (0.45)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Polling stable; no Tidö-collapse signals</td></tr><tr><td>BULL scenario probability (0.22)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>S-led minority is plausible but requires favourable polling swings</td></tr><tr><td>BEAR scenario probability (0.10)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historically rare; requires Tidö collapse + opposition unity</td></tr><tr><td>WILDCARD probability (0.05)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Minority-gov volatility possible but 2022 showed parliament can resolve</td></tr><tr><td>Red-Team posterior (cluster value is tactical not strategic)</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Compelling counter-case but not decisive</td></tr><tr><td>Bayesian update magnitudes</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Calibrated on historical analogues, but Swedish politics idiosyncratic</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>synthesis-summary.md</code> — LEAD story selection and findings</li>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — 14-day watch window</li>
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-2">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Methodology upgrade from v1</strong>: Added (1) Bayesian prior probabilities with forward signals that update L; (2) ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) assessment; (3) risk interconnection graph showing cascade dependencies; (4) scenario-linked risk weighting per <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks">🎯 Risk Matrix: Consolidated Policy/Electoral/Institutional Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix-consolidated-policyelectoralinstitutional-risks"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Likelihood (L)</strong>: 1 (very unlikely) → 5 (near-certain). Expressed with Bayesian prior P(L≥3).</li>
 <li><strong>Impact (I)</strong>: 1 (minimal) → 5 (transformational). Impact magnitude: electoral seats, legislative outcomes, reputational cost.</li>
@@ -2638,8 +2638,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">R#</th><th>Risk description</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th align="center">Band</th><th align="center">Prior P(L≥3)</th><th>Owner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>R01</strong></td><td>Government passes immigration bills over opposition → polarisation lock-in before 2026 election</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>25</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.95</td><td>Opposition bloc</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R02</strong></td><td>New Reception Law (prop. 2025/26:229) faces legal challenge at Admin Court on EU Pact / ECHR grounds</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>Government + MP (litigation-support)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R03</strong></td><td>Opposition fuel-tax stance alienates rural voters — S loses seats in Norrland constituencies</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>S Norrland apparatus</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R04</strong></td><td>Arms-export counter-motions (V+MP) create post-2026 coalition-formation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>V + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R05</strong></td><td>Healthcare reform (SoU) passes with S+V+C opposition → implementation friction</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td>Government + SKR</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R06</strong></td><td>Crime-victim compensation changes (prop. 2025/26:214) create unintended consequences for child welfare</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>Socialstyrelsen</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R07</strong></td><td>C breaks from opposition consensus on deportation → negotiates with government</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td>C leadership</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R08</strong></td><td>Rising unemployment (8.69% 2025) amplifies anti-immigration sentiment → opposition narrative harder</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td align="center">ACT</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td>Opposition communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R09</strong></td><td><strong>S revealed-preference silence on deportation</strong> becomes durable intra-opposition fracture</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td>S + V + MP coordination</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R10</strong></td><td>V's universal-rejectionist pattern triggers SD attack-ad cycle — V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R11</strong></td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 explicitly critiques private-operator clauses → forces amendment</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td>Lagrådet (external)</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R12</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax cut triggers EU DG CLIMA infringement preliminary (Fit-for-55 / ETS II context)</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet + MP</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R13</strong></td><td>ECtHR Strasbourg pilot-judgment on deportation expansion (3–5 year horizon)</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td>Government legal review</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R14</strong></td><td>Transport union (Transportarbetareförbundet) publicly splits from S on fuel-tax cut → damages S working-class brand</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td align="center">MITIGATE</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td>S + LO dialogue</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R15</strong></td><td>No 175+ post-2026 majority; minority-government instability; snap election 2027–2028</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td align="center">ACCEPT</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td>All parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band">🔴 Critical Risks (L×I ≥ 16 — ACT Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-risks-li--16--act-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In (L×I = 25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The government's three-proposition immigration package (prop. 2025/26:229, 235, 215) will pass with M/SD/KD/L majority. The opposition's 10 counter-motions, while democratically essential, will all fail. This creates a <strong>polarisation lock-in</strong>: the government campaigns on "we secured the borders" while opposition campaigns on "we defended human rights" — both narratives are true and irreconcilable. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (World Bank data), voter anxiety about resource competition makes the government's framing electorally stronger.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2649,7 +2649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r01--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-li--25">R01 — Immigration Pol
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Materialisation timeline</strong>: SfU → May 2026; Chamber → June 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition strategic response <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: S's pivot to "integration investment" narrative (HD024079) frames integration as economic productivity, not welfare spending. Combine with comparative-international evidence (private-operator clauses outlier even in Nordic context) to shift frame from "border security" to "welfare-state defence".</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 — Unemployment Context Erodes Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Economic context</strong>: Sweden's unemployment rose from 8.4% (2024) to 8.69% (2025) while GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (after –0.2% in 2023). Economic fragility makes voters more receptive to government arguments about limiting immigration-related public expenditure.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals that would update L</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2660,8 +2660,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-r08--unemployment-context-erodes-opposition-narrative-li--16">R08 —
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Forward indicator</strong>: Q1 2026 LFS results (expected May 2026) will either strengthen or weaken this risk.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band">🟠 High Risks (L×I 10–15 — MITIGATE Band)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-risks-li-1015--mitigate-band"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-Law ECHR/EU Pact Challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Post-adoption, prop. 2025/26:229's private-operator clauses face challenge at Migrationsdomstolen on EU Pact Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 grounds; ultimate ECtHR referral possible within 36 months.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Full elimination requires either government removing private-operator clauses (no political path) or opposition pre-emptively building litigation record — MP's HD024087 is that record.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>: MP's HD024087 text explicitly invokes EU Pact — usable as precedent for NGO amicus briefs.</p>
@@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r02--reception-law-echreu-pact-challenge-li--12">R02 — Reception-La
 <li>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar → L ↑ to 4</li>
 <li>Government amends to remove private-operator clauses → L ↓ to 1</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Risk (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Specific risk</strong>: The extra budget cuts fuel taxes, directly benefiting rural households with longer commutes. S's HD024082 opposing the cut may be read in rural constituencies as "S doesn't care about our fuel costs." S lost Norrland ground in 2022.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination not feasible (S cannot reverse HD024082 filing); reduction requires rural-counter-offer communications strategy.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r03--fuel-tax-rural-vote-risk-li--12">R03 — Fuel-Tax Rural-Vote Ris
 <li>Rural S MPs issue coordinated statement on HD024082 intent → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Major fuel-price spike (OPEC / geopolitical) during campaign → L ↑ to 5</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Strategic significance</strong>: C's HD024095 on deportation is distinctively moderate — demands proportionality test (systematic repeated offenses). Positions C as potential negotiating partner with government on immigration. If C negotiates, it breaks the four-party opposition front.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. C's negotiation posture is a feature of its political positioning, not elimination-target for opposition. Mitigation is about <strong>channelling</strong> rather than suppressing C.</p>
 <p><strong>Mitigation</strong>:</p>
@@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-r07--c-as-pivot-party-li--12">R07 — C as Pivot Party (L×I = 12)<a
 <li>Paarup-Petersen rejects amendment talks → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>Lagrådet cites proportionality test → L ↑ to 5 (government forced to negotiate)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on Deportation Fracture (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: S filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235 despite filing on reception (HD024080), housing (HD024079), and fuel tax (HD024082). Signals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for a centre-left party. Reveals that "opposition unity" is selective.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE. Elimination requires S to file on follow-on deportation legislation in 2026–2027. Monitoring is primary mitigation.</p>
 <p><strong>Bayesian signals</strong>:</p>
@@ -2710,11 +2710,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-r09--s-silence-on-deportation-fracture-li--12">R09 — S-Silence on D
 <li>S leadership public statement on deportation proportionality → L ↓ to 2</li>
 <li>S silence extends through election campaign → L ↑ to 4</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10">R11 — Lagrådet Critical Yttrande (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r11--lagrådet-critical-yttrande-li--10"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk</strong>: Lagrådet explicitly critiques private-operator clauses; government forced to amend. High-impact but uncertain-likelihood.</p>
 <p><strong>ALARP</strong>: MITIGATE via opposition monitoring and pre-amplification of Lagrådet language in press.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-interconnection-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     R01[R01 Polarisation Lock-In&#x3C;br/>L×I=25]
     R08[R08 Unemployment Context&#x3C;br/>L×I=16]
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-risk-interconnection-graph">🕸️ Risk Interconnection Graph<a
 <p><strong>Cascade reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: R01 (polarisation lock-in) is the <strong>central node</strong> — 6 other risks feed into it. R08 (unemployment) is the <strong>amplification multiplier</strong>. Opposition mitigation should therefore prioritise R08 (labour-market narrative) and R10 (V rejectionism) as the two highest-leverage input nodes.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--risk-visualisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-visualisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Opposition Motions (April 2026)
     x-axis "Low Likelihood" --> "High Likelihood"
@@ -2786,7 +2786,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--risk-visualisation">📊 Risk Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "R13 ECtHR Pilot": [0.28, 0.90]
     "R15 Minority Gov": [0.18, 0.92]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk Indicators (Bayesian Update Signals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2884,7 +2884,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-risk-indicators-bayesian-update-signals">🔭 Forward Risk I
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SfU committee scheduling of immigration propositions</td><td>Committee dates announced</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R01, R07, R09</td></tr><tr><td>C leader public statement on HD024095 amendment</td><td>Media appearance</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 Labour Force Survey (SCB)</td><td>Monthly release</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R08</td></tr><tr><td>ECtHR Sweden deportation case rulings</td><td>Any ruling</td><td>Q2-Q3 2026</td><td>R02, R13</td></tr><tr><td>SVT Novus polls on immigration #1 salience</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>FiU committee vote on extra budget</td><td>Committee vote</td><td>May 2026</td><td>R03, R12, R14</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R11, R02</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</td><td>Release</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>R07</td></tr><tr><td>Transport union public statement</td><td>Press release</td><td>≤ 21 days</td><td>R14</td></tr><tr><td>Saab/BAE quarterly earnings commentary</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R04</td></tr><tr><td>S follow-on motion on 2026-2027 deportation legislation</td><td>Motion filing</td><td>2026-2027</td><td>R09</td></tr><tr><td>Novus migration-salience tracking</td><td>Monthly</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>R01, R08</td></tr><tr><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>R12</td></tr><tr><td>Röda Korset + Rädda Barnen joint remissvar on 2025/26:229</td><td>Position paper</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>R02, R11</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current coalition stability <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: STABLE (M/SD/KD/L intact)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All immigration propositions will pass as planned</li>
@@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--coalition-stability-assessment">🎯 Coalition Stability Assessment<
 <li>Campaign-narrative lock-in requires sustained media and polling discipline through summer 2026</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> — Bayesian scenario weighting + risk activation per scenario</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team critique adjusts R01 consequence magnitude</li>
@@ -2919,7 +2919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-3">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -2955,7 +2955,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:04 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework</strong></td><td>Political SWOT v2.2 + <strong>TOWS interference matrix</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Stakeholder Coverage</strong></td><td>All 8 mandatory groups + 4-cluster drill-down</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-multi-stakeholder-swot-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>The 21 opposition motions filed April 14–17, 2026 reveal a unified opposition counter-strategy against the government's spring legislative package. Analysis below covers:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level SWOT</strong> for the LEAD immigration cluster (primary focus)</li>
@@ -2964,8 +2964,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--multi-stakeholder-swot-framework">🔬 Multi-Stakeholder SWOT Framew
 <li>All 8 mandatory stakeholder groups</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94">⚡ SWOT: Immigration Policy Cluster (LEAD — DIW 9.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-immigration-policy-cluster-lead--diw-94"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-of-opposition-motions">Strengths of Opposition Motions<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S1</strong></td><td>Quadruple-party coordination on New Reception Law signals disciplined opposition front</td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C) — all within 72 h of prop. 2025/26:229</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S2</strong></td><td>S's counter-motion on reception law targets private-sector asylum housing — protects vulnerable people and creates positive electoral narrative</td><td>HD024080: "asylboenden ska inte kunna överlåtas i privat drift" — clear anti-privatization platform</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S3</strong></td><td>C takes moderate position on deportation — requires proportionality (systematic repeated offenses) — converges with European statutory mainstream</td><td>HD024095 — aligned with Germany AufenthG §53, Netherlands "glijdende schaal", Denmark Udlændingeloven §26</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S4</strong></td><td>MP's comprehensive rejection of deportation law challenges constitutional proportionality principle; ECHR Art. 8 alignment</td><td>HD024097 — preserves partial law (8 kap. 1-3 §) while rejecting coercive expansion</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S5</strong></td><td>V's total-rejection strategy provides left-flank anchor for opposition messaging</td><td>HD024090 — outright rejection of entire prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S6</strong></td><td>S's challenge to time-limited immigrant housing frames integration as economic investment, not welfare</td><td>HD024079 — Ardalan Shekarabi requests government return with new housing proposals</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S7</strong></td><td>MP's EU Pact compatibility frame (HD024087) gives cluster international-legitimacy authority</td><td>HD024087 cites EU Reg. 2024/1348 Art. 17 material-conditions standard</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>S8</strong></td><td>Division-of-labour frames cover all major voter segments (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric-axis analysis across HD024076/80/87/89</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses-of-opposition-motions">Weaknesses of Opposition Motions<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>W1</strong></td><td>S's positions on immigration are internally contradictory — party supported stricter policies 2022–2024, now opposes them</td><td>S filed HD024080 but governed with stricter policy 2014-2022</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W2</strong></td><td>Four-party coordination masks substantive incompatibility — V's rejection (HD024090) and C's amendment (HD024095) cannot co-govern</td><td>Motion-text comparison V vs C on same proposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W3</strong></td><td>V and MP arms-export motions put them at odds with post-NATO consensus</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58/32/10 SOM arms-export support (2025)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W4</strong></td><td>MP's across-the-board rejection strategy (4 total rejections) risks being seen as obstructionist</td><td>HD024087, HD024097, HD024096, HD024098 — all outright rejections</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W5</strong></td><td><strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> (HD024090/95/97 cluster) reveals S has calculated deportation is a losing issue for centre-left</td><td>S filed no motion on prop. 2025/26:235; filed on every other cluster</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W6</strong></td><td>No joint press conference or coalition statement; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>W7</strong></td><td>V's consistent-rejection pattern across immigration + arms creates "universal rejectionist" frame vulnerability</td><td>HD024076 + HD024090 + HD024091 all rejection-structured</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by These Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3186,7 +3186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities-created-by-these-motions">Opportunities Created by Thes
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>O1</strong></td><td>Immigration becomes defining election issue — opposition can build 2026 campaign around "humane alternative"</td><td>10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">CRITICAL</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O2</strong></td><td>Fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) gives S+MP ownership of climate narrative</td><td>Sweden GDP 0.82% 2024, unemployment 8.69% 2025 — economic alternative story</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O3</strong></td><td>Healthcare motions (HD024081/83/94) create unusual S+V+C coalition signalling post-2026 cooperation potential</td><td>Three ideologically diverse parties on healthcare governance</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O4</strong></td><td>Riksrevisionen report on Sida enables MP+C to demand accountability on government aid effectiveness</td><td>HD024072/70 — adds "good governance" credibility</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O5</strong></td><td>C's proportionality frame on deportation may attract L backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L rule-of-law sensitivity + comparative statutory-test alignment</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O6</strong></td><td>Post-adoption ECtHR litigation on deportation creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Swedish ECHR adverse-judgment track record</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>O7</strong></td><td>MP's end-user review language on arms (HD024096) aligns with Norwegian/Dutch/German practice — standard-setting</td><td>Comparative analysis §4</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3258,9 +3258,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-to-opposition-strategy">Threats to Opposition Strategy<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Statement</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Conf.</th><th align="center">Impact</th><th align="center">Entry</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>T1</strong></td><td>Government M/SD/KD/L majority will pass all four propositions; opposition risks credibility</td><td>prop. 2025/26:229/235/215/236/228 all have coalition support</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T2</strong></td><td>S's opposition to fuel-tax cut may alienate working-class rural voters who benefit</td><td>HD024082 vs Norrland S vote 2022 baseline</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T3</strong></td><td>Arms-export opposition (V+MP) conflicts with Swedish post-NATO security doctrine</td><td>HD024091/96 vs 58% public support continued exports</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T4</strong></td><td>Coordinated opposition risks being framed as "obstructionism" on security-critical reforms</td><td>Simultaneous rejection on deportation/reception/housing/arms</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T5</strong></td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's consistent-rejection pattern as "defends criminals / unreliable on Ukraine"</td><td>V's HD024090 + HD024091 joint attack surface</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T6</strong></td><td>62% voter support for stricter immigration sets a polling floor opposition cannot breach</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 migration salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T7</strong></td><td>Extra-budget fast-track procedure on fuel tax compresses opposition narrative-building window to ≤ 4 weeks</td><td>FiU extra-budget timetable</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation">🎯 TOWS Interference Matrix — Cross-Quadrant Strategy Derivation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-interference-matrix--cross-quadrant-strategy-derivation"></a></h3>
 <p>The TOWS matrix multiplies SWOT quadrants to surface non-obvious strategic moves. Below: the <strong>≥3-entry interference cells</strong> with strategic impact on the April 2026 opposition campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opportunities) — Offensive Moves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-so-strengths--opportunities--offensive-moves">SO (Strengths × Opport
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO1</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>Sustain coordinated-opposition narrative through summer</strong> with sequential follow-on motions and media events designed to prevent government from reclaiming the agenda</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO2</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C moderate/statutory) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Target L MPs</strong> (Johan Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) via C's amendment frame; L's historical rule-of-law sensitivity + statutory-test comparative alignment creates narrow negotiation window</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × O2 (climate narrative)</strong></td><td><strong>Link housing-privatisation to fuel-tax private-benefit</strong> as "government prioritises private interests over public goods" unified frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>SO4</strong></td><td><strong>S7 (MP EU Pact compatibility) × O6 (ECtHR litigation)</strong></td><td><strong>Pre-stage EU Commission remissvar + Strasbourg litigation path</strong>; MP's HD024087 text is usable as precedent for post-adoption legal challenge</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats) — Defensive Hardening<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-st-strengths--threats--defensive-hardening">ST (Strengths × Threats)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST1</strong></td><td><strong>S3 (C proportionality, European mainstream) × T4 (obstructionism frame)</strong></td><td><strong>Publish comparative-international analysis</strong> showing C's amendment converges with Germany, Netherlands, Denmark — neutralises obstructionism charge</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST2</strong></td><td><strong>S1 (4-party coordination) × T1 (government majority passes)</strong></td><td><strong>Coordinate SfU vote sequencing</strong> — amendment first, then rejection — to prevent "disarray" framing at chamber vote</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>ST3</strong></td><td><strong>S2 (S anti-privatisation) × T2 (rural-voter alienation)</strong></td><td><strong>Front Norrland-anchored S MPs</strong> (Joakim Järrebring, Fredrik Lundh Sammeli) in media appearances on welfare-state framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weaknesses × Opportunities) — Strategic Pivots Required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3346,7 +3346,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wo-weaknesses--opportunities--strategic-pivots-required">WO (Weakness
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Interference</th><th>Strategy</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO1</strong></td><td><strong>W1 (S 2015–2022 legacy) × O1 (election definition)</strong></td><td><strong>S must own the 2015 pivot publicly</strong> — frame HD024080 as "learning from experience" to neutralise legacy-credibility gap</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO2</strong></td><td><strong>W5 (S-silence on deportation) × O3 (S+V+C healthcare coalition)</strong></td><td><strong>S should use healthcare coalition as broader S+V+C rehearsal template</strong>; deportation-silence fragments the left only if not compensated by other coordination evidence</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>WO3</strong></td><td><strong>W2 (V–C incompatibility) × O5 (L backbench)</strong></td><td><strong>Stage-manage SfU voting</strong>: C's amendment goes first; if passed, C-V-MP-S-L vote together on amended law; if failed, they unify on rejection. Avoid simultaneous V-reject + C-amend vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weaknesses × Threats) — 🔴 Critical Strategic Vulnerabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3387,25 +3387,25 @@ <h3 id="rm-wt-weaknesses--threats---critical-strategic-vulnerabilities">WT (Weak
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>WT1</strong> (V universal rejectionism × SD attack ads) and <strong>WT2</strong> (V–C incompatibility × government majority) are the <strong>two critical vulnerabilities</strong> that could collapse the cluster's campaign value. <strong>WO3</strong> is the essential mitigation: disciplined SfU vote sequencing.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix">👥 8-Stakeholder Perspective Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-perspective-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens--medium-salience">1. Citizens (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish citizens experience immigration policy directly through social services, housing markets, and labour competition. With unemployment at 8.69% in 2025 (up from 8.4% in 2024), citizens in lower-income brackets are receptive to government arguments about limiting new arrivals. However, <strong>S's HD024080</strong> appeals to citizens concerned about privatisation of asylum services — a proxy for welfare-state protection values that resonate with S's base. The fuel-tax opposition (HD024082/98) speaks directly to household budgets but risks appearing out-of-touch with rural drivers. A <strong>divided citizenry</strong> is the realistic baseline — the opposition's job is to move ~3-5% swing voters, not to flip majority opinion. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience">2. Government Coalition (M/SD/KD/L) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>The governing coalition views these counter-motions as expected partisan opposition. For <strong>Tidö-agreement</strong> parties, the immigration cluster validates their legislative agenda. The sheer number of counter-motions (10/21 on immigration) <strong>confirms the opposition's strategy</strong> and allows the government to campaign on "defending Sweden's security" against a unified left-green-centre bloc. <strong>L is the weak link</strong>: Johan Pehrson's historical rule-of-law sensitivity and the comparative evidence backing C's HD024095 proportionality test create a narrow fault line. The fuel-tax counter-motions create a secondary vulnerability — the government must justify why a climate-ambivalent tax cut is in Sweden's interest. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience">3. Opposition Bloc (S/V/MP/C) (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-svmpc--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>This batch represents the most coordinated opposition filing in the current riksmöte. <strong>Socialdemokraterna (S)</strong> under party leader Magdalena Andersson is pursuing a "responsible opposition" strategy — accepting some security reforms while drawing clear lines on welfare-state privatisation (HD024080) and integration investment (HD024079). The <strong>S-silence on deportation</strong> is strategic, not accidental. <strong>Vänsterpartiet (V)</strong> under Nooshi Dadgostar maintains a principled rejection stance on all immigration tightening but risks the universal-rejectionist framing. <strong>Miljöpartiet (MP)</strong> under Janine Alm Ericson leads on climate issues (HD024098) and humanitarian concerns. <strong>Centerpartiet (C)</strong> occupies the critical swing position — accepting some deportation reform but demanding proportionality (HD024095); C is the most politically interesting actor in this wave because its amendment posture is the bridge between opposition messaging and European mainstream practice. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience">4. Business/Industry (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-businessindustry--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish industry faces contradictory pressures. The fuel-tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) benefits transport-dependent industries — making S's HD024082 unpopular with business. However, the time-limited housing law (prop. 2025/26:215) addresses industry's need for a stable, integratable workforce — V's HD024077 argues the housing limitation reduces integration success, which over time damages labour supply. Consumer-credit reform (HD024088, C) affects the financial services sector directly. <strong>Defence industry</strong> (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Karlskoga ~8k jobs) opposes V's HD024091 and will quietly lobby committee MPs. <strong>Transport-sector unions</strong> may publicly split from S on HD024082 — a risk S must pre-empt. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society--high-salience">5. Civil Society (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>NGOs, church organisations, and refugee-advocacy groups are the strongest supporters of all opposition immigration motions. <strong>Röda Korset</strong>, <strong>Rädda Barnen</strong>, and <strong>Caritas Sverige</strong> have publicly opposed prop. 2025/26:229. Civil-society concerns centre on: (1) private-sector asylum housing (S's HD024080), (2) proportionality in deportation (C's HD024095 / MP's HD024097), and (3) integration investment (S's HD024079). Crime-victim organisations have mixed views on HD024078/84/85 — parent-liability provisions in the crime-victim law create tension with child-protection principles. <strong>Svenska Freds, Diakonia, Amnesty Sverige</strong> form a durable pro-opposition coalition on arms-export motions. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience">6. International/EU (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-internationaleu--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's immigration policy reforms must remain compatible with the <strong>EU Pact on Migration and Asylum</strong> (entered force 2024, phased implementation 2025–2027). <strong>MP's HD024087</strong> explicitly argues the new reception law risks non-compliance with Reg. 2024/1348 Article 17 material-conditions standard. The arms-export motions (HD024091/96) create international friction — <strong>Sweden's NATO partners</strong> (UK, Germany, US) expect continued defence-industry cooperation post-NATO accession. <strong>EU DG CLIMA</strong> is monitoring Swedish fuel-tax policy under Fit-for-55 and ETS II (entering 2027). <strong>ECtHR</strong> remains a durable post-adoption challenge venue on deportation (prop. 2025/26:235). <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience">7. Judiciary/Constitutional (🟧 MEDIUM Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciaryconstitutional--medium-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Legal scholars have flagged proportionality concerns in prop. 2025/26:235. <strong>C's HD024095</strong> reflects this — requiring "systematic repeated offenses over time" for deportation aligns with European Court of Human Rights proportionality doctrine and converges with Germany/Netherlands/Denmark/Switzerland statutory practice. <strong>V's total rejection (HD024090)</strong> goes further, arguing the entire law conflicts with ECHR Article 8 (family life). <strong>Lagrådet yttrande</strong> on prop. 2025/26:229 and 2025/26:235 is the single most consequential pending signal — expected Q2 2026. Konstitutionsutskottet (KU) has not published a formal opinion. Administrative Courts (Migrationsdomstolen) will become the main post-adoption venue. <code>[MEDIUM]</code></p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience">8. Media/Public Opinion (🟩 HIGH Salience)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-mediapublic-opinion--high-salience"></a></h4>
 <p>Swedish media (SVT, DN, Aftonbladet, SvD) will cover the coordinated opposition filing as a major political story. Public polling (Novus Q1 2026) shows immigration as the #1 political concern for Swedish voters in 2025–2026. The "four parties against one law" narrative is highly newsworthy. The fuel-tax story plays differently: tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) will frame it as "opposition opposes affordable fuel" — a potential negative story for S. Regional/local media (Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT) will cover the Norrland angle on fuel tax. Young-voter media (TikTok, Instagram) favours MP's climate frame. <strong>Press editorial lines</strong> will be split: DN/SvD lean cautiously pro-government; Aftonbladet/ETC lean pro-opposition; Expressen variable. <code>[HIGH]</code></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordination Flowchart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-flowchart"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Immigration["🏛️ Immigration Policy Cluster (10 motions · LEAD)"]
         P229["prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law"]
@@ -3457,7 +3457,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-coordination-flowchart">🗺️ Opposition Coordinatio
     style P228 fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style P216 fill:#17a2b8,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — LEAD finding + ACH + Red-Team</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a> — LEAD cluster SWOT</li>
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-4">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3510,7 +3510,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Date</strong></td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Riksmöte</strong></td><td>2025/26</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:06 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong></td><td>🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (democratic process functioning normally; specific strategic threats identified)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frameworks</strong></td><td>Threat taxonomy + <strong>Attack-tree</strong> (opposition) + <strong>Kill-chain</strong> (government counter-strategy) + <strong>Diamond Model</strong> (disinformation) + <strong>STRIDE-adapted</strong> (political-process integrity)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--executive-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 14–17 opposition-motions wave does not represent a constitutional or security threat — it constitutes <strong>healthy democratic opposition exercising accountability functions</strong>. The threat dimensions below are <strong>strategic threats to narrative control</strong> (who wins the 2026 campaign), <strong>governance threats to policy coherence</strong> (climate-fiscal contradiction), and <strong>institutional-integrity threats</strong> (disinformation, coordinated inauthentic behaviour around immigration narratives).</p>
 <p><strong>Six substantive threat lines</strong> merit monitoring, mapped across four complementary frameworks:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -3522,7 +3522,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--executive-summary-1">🎯 Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>T6 NEW: Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour</strong> [MEDIUM] — narrative-integrity threat from domestic-foreign influence actors exploiting immigration salience</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 2026 Threat Analysis] --> B[Democratic Process]
     A --> C[Policy Coherence]
@@ -3556,8 +3556,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-threat-taxonomy">⚠️ Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="t
     style F1 fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style F2 fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely">🔴 MEDIUM Threats (Monitor Closely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medium-threats-monitor-closely"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 — Immigration Polarisation Lock-In [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The unprecedented coordination of S, V, MP, and C against three immigration propositions simultaneously risks <strong>locking in a binary political cleavage</strong> that dominates 2026 election discourse to the exclusion of other policy areas. When all major opposition parties align on a single policy dimension:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Simplifies electoral choice in ways that may not reflect voter complexity</li>
@@ -3566,16 +3566,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-t1--immigration-polarisation-lock-in-medium---medium-confidence">T1 
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: 10 of 21 motions (48%) target immigration — no other policy area comes close. The concentration signals that the opposition has calculated immigration is their highest-return electoral investment.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — electoral dynamics are inherently uncertain; the threat materialises only if the opposition successfully executes its framing strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence">T2 — Climate-Fiscal Government Contradiction [MEDIUM — 🟩 HIGH Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--climate-fiscal-government-contradiction-medium---high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's GDP growth was only 0.82% in 2024 (recovering from –0.2% in 2023), yet the government's prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes in a supplementary budget — a move that adds <strong>+0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</strong> (Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling) at a time when Sweden is ~20% behind its 2030 trajectory under Klimatlagen 2017:720. S (HD024082) and MP (HD024098) both challenge this with different framings but reach the same conclusion: the fuel-tax cut is bad policy.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this is a governance threat</strong>: If the government passes a climate-inconsistent budget measure while claiming climate leadership, it creates a credibility gap that international partners (EU Commission DG CLIMA, climate-finance investors) may exploit. S's demand that the government "return with a new proposal" is procedurally responsible.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparative evidence</strong>: Only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt) is a direct precedent; Germany did not extend. Sweden is betting against European experience.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟩 HIGH — the climate-fiscal contradiction is factual and measurable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence">T3 — Arms-Export Policy Uncertainty [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--arms-export-policy-uncertainty-medium---medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>V's HD024091 (complete rejection of prop. 2025/26:228) and MP's HD024096 (arms-export ban including follow-up deliveries) signal that a future left-green government would reverse Sweden's post-NATO defence-industrial policy. This creates <strong>policy uncertainty risk</strong> for defence-industry investment decisions. Swedish arms manufacturers (Saab Linköping ~15k jobs, BAE Systems Karlskoga ~8k jobs) need long-term policy certainty that their export licences will be maintained.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Both motions challenge prop. 2025/26:228. V's motion explicitly rejects the proposed law; MP demands a ban on exports to human-rights violators.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — V and MP are currently in opposition with no pathway to government without S.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-">T6 — Disinformation / Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour [MEDIUM — 🟧 MEDIUM Confidence] 🆕<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Immigration-salience political moments in Sweden 2018, 2022, and now 2026 have correlated with <strong>foreign state-linked amplification networks</strong> (documented by MSB and FOI) and <strong>domestic anonymous influence operations</strong> on social platforms. The April 2026 opposition-motion wave provides a high-value target for:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Foreign influence operations</strong> (Russian-linked and Chinese-linked networks per FOI 2024 assessment) amplifying polarising framings</li>
@@ -3627,7 +3627,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t6--disinformation--coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour-medium---medium
 <li>Foreign-language amplification of Swedish political debate (Russian, Arabic, English)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">⚔️ Attack-Tree — Opposition Narrative Capture (Hostile Perspective)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective"></a></h3>
 <p>Modelled from <strong>government-perspective</strong>: how might the government/SD dismantle the opposition's four-party narrative?</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["🎯 GOAL: Break 4-party opposition narrative&#x3C;br/>before 2026 election"]
@@ -3688,7 +3688,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-attack-tree--opposition-narrative-capture-hostile-perspective">
 <p><strong>Highest-feasibility attack vectors</strong> (dark orange): <strong>A1</strong> (V-C split), <strong>A2</strong> (S-silence exploit), <strong>C1</strong> (V rejectionism attack ads), <strong>D1-D3</strong> (party-specific discrediting). <strong>Opposition mitigation priorities</strong> map directly to SWOT TOWS WT1-WT3.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kill-Chain — Government Narrative Counter-Operation (Adapted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted"></a></h3>
 <p>Seven-stage adaptation of the Lockheed-Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a political-communications counter-operation:</p>
 
 
@@ -3737,7 +3737,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--kill-chain--government-narrative-counter-operation-adapted">🎯 Kil
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Stage</th><th>Government counter-step</th><th>Opposition counter-counter</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1 Reconnaissance</td><td>SD+M opposition-research team analyses V's HD024076/90/91 for rejectionism patterns</td><td>V pre-audits own filing texts for rejection-framing bias</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2 Weaponisation</td><td>SD ad agency produces attack ads: "V abandons Ukraine" (linking HD024091 to Ukraine-support narrative)</td><td>V issues pre-emptive Ukraine-support statement pairing each arms motion</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3 Delivery</td><td>Ads on YouTube, TikTok, Facebook + front-page placement Expressen</td><td>Opposition paid-media counter on same platforms</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4 Exploitation</td><td>Ads exploit cost-of-living anxiety (74% priority — Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Opposition pivots to integration-as-economic-productivity frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5 Installation</td><td>Frame installed via repeated broadcast → "opposition = chaos"</td><td>Opposition produces positive vision: cross-party amendment on HD024095</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6 Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Tidö-coalition daily message discipline enforcing frame</td><td>Opposition four-leader coordinated op-eds (without joint photo)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7 Actions on Objectives</td><td>Polling moves 1–2 points toward M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Mid-campaign frame-shift to climate or healthcare (where opposition wins)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRIDE-Adapted — Political-Process Integrity Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
 <p>Adapting STRIDE (Microsoft threat-modelling) to democratic-process integrity:</p>
 
 
@@ -3788,7 +3788,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-stride-adapted--political-process-integrity-threats">🛡️ STRI
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">STRIDE</th><th>Translation to political context</th><th>Manifestation in April 2026 cluster</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center"><strong>S</strong>poofing</td><td>Fake actors impersonating politicians / parties</td><td>Deepfake videos of S / V / MP / C leaders pro/anti positions</td><td>Platform verification; rapid-response units</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>T</strong>ampering</td><td>Altering policy texts or records</td><td>Fake versions of motion texts circulated on social media</td><td>Riksdagen authoritative-text portal; press fact-checking</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>R</strong>epudiation</td><td>Actors denying statements later</td><td>Party leaders claiming "that's not what our motion says"</td><td>Timestamped primary sources; dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>I</strong>nformation disclosure</td><td>Private-data leaks around politicians</td><td>Hacked constituency data used to target voters</td><td>Cybersecurity; MFA; GDPR enforcement</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>D</strong>enial of service</td><td>Suppressing legitimate speech</td><td>Spam flooding of comment sections; fake reports to deplatform opponents</td><td>Platform-policy transparency; legal recourse</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>E</strong>levation of privilege</td><td>Foreign actors posing as Swedish voters</td><td>Foreign-language amplification networks</td><td>MSB/FOI monitoring; platform CIB removal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threat-level-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3846,7 +3846,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threat-level-summary">📊 Threat Level Summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th align="center">Level</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Framework</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1 Immigration polarisation</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2026 election</td><td>Taxonomy + kill-chain</td></tr><tr><td>T2 Climate-fiscal contradiction</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Immediate</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T3 Arms-export policy uncertainty</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Post-2026</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T4 Deportation proportionality</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>ECHR review</td></tr><tr><td>T5 Democratic-deficit perception</td><td align="center">🟢 LOW</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>Taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td>T6 Disinformation / CIB</td><td align="center">🟡 MEDIUM</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Immediate–September</td><td>Diamond + STRIDE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: 🟡 <strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Healthy democratic process with identifiable strategic threats, primarily in the <strong>narrative-capture</strong> and <strong>information-integrity</strong> domains rather than <strong>constitutional / rule-of-law</strong> domains.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-analyst-actions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3908,7 +3908,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--recommended-analyst-actions">🧭 Recommended Analyst Actions<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Action</th><th align="center">Priority</th><th>Addressed-to</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Pre-stage V Ukraine-support statement template paired with arms-export motions</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>V communications</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Coordinate SfU amendment-first vote sequencing (mitigates A1 attack)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S+V+MP+C whips</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Issue comparative-international evidence briefing to newsrooms (mitigates C2 obstructionism frame)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Opposition press shops</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Monitor MSB/FOI CIB reports; rapid-response to amplification spikes</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>All opposition parties</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Prepare rural S MP media schedule (mitigates D1 + R03)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>S Norrland delegation</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Pre-audit motion texts for deepfake/rumour pre-emption (STRIDE S/T)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>All four opposition press offices</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Document Lagrådet yttrande preparation; pre-brief journalists</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition legal advisors</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>Establish 24h joint-response rotation for attack-ad counters</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition communications coalition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — Red-Team + ACH ties directly to T1</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — R10 (V rejectionist) ↔ T1/A1/C1</li>
@@ -3921,7 +3921,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-5">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-arms-export-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -3969,7 +3969,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-arms-export-cluster">arms-export-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>ARMS-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024091 (V), HD024096 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:228 — <em>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Utrikesutskottet (UU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>Both 2026-04-16 (same-day dual filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>7.5/10 (minority-bloc opposition on post-NATO defence policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>7.50</strong> (×1.00 — foreign-policy dimension neutral weighting)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral foreign policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🔶 <strong>TERTIARY</strong> story with long-horizon significance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why This Cluster Matters — The "Post-NATO Posture Divergence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden joined NATO on 7 March 2024, ending 200+ years of formal military non-alignment (<em>alliansfriheten</em>). Prop. 2025/26:228 modernises the arms-export legal framework (<em>lag om krigsmateriel</em> + <em>lag om vissa produkter som kan användas för dödsstraff eller tortyr</em>) to align Swedish defence-industrial practice with its new alliance obligations and the post-Ukraine-invasion European armaments market reality.</p>
 <p>The V (HD024091) and MP (HD024096) counter-motions are important <strong>not because they will alter the outcome</strong> — the M/SD/KD/L coalition has a secure majority on foreign-policy questions, and the opposition is split with S absent — but because they are <strong>post-NATO reference points</strong>. They establish, publicly and on the parliamentary record, what a future V/MP/(potential S)-led government would do differently.</p>
 <p>This matters for three audiences:</p>
@@ -3982,7 +3982,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters--the-post-nato-posture-divergence">1. Why
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The cluster is a <strong>low-probability, high-consequence signalling event</strong>. With no S and only V+MP filing, it lacks electoral consequence in 2026. But it sets the <strong>baseline parameters of the post-2026 defence-policy debate</strong>. If any government-formation scenario includes V or MP (even as a confidence-and-supply partner), the positions in HD024091 and HD024096 become immediate negotiation constraints.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP Divergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4012,7 +4012,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--the-vmp-divergence">2. Evidence Table — The V/MP
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Position</th><th>Electoral message</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024091</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Håkan Svenneling</td><td><strong>Complete rejection</strong> of the proposition; preserve pre-existing restrictive regime</td><td>"We do not profit from other people's wars"</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Jacob Risberg</td><td><strong>Conditional acceptance</strong> — ban exports to human-rights-violator states; require follow-up-delivery review</td><td>"Defence yes; profit from oppression no"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Divergence analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: V and MP have historically both opposed arms-export liberalisation but with different intensities. This filing confirms a <strong>persistent 2022 → 2026 ideological gap</strong> between them on defence: V is pacifist-adjacent; MP is "ethical defence" — accepting defence industry but with strict end-user controls. Post-NATO, MP's position is more politically viable; V's position is more electorally costly in the current security environment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession — Changed Context Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4059,7 +4059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-post-nato-accession--changed-context-matrix">3. Post-NATO Accession
 <p><strong>Insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Post-NATO context makes this <strong>the weakest cluster</strong> in the April 2026 opposition-motions wave. V and MP are filing for <strong>ideological consistency</strong> rather than electoral leverage. Analysts should weight the motions as <strong>signalling, not policy-influencing</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4137,7 +4137,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-cluster-swot">4. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Ideological consistency: V and MP have opposed arms-export liberalisation since the 1990s; credible filing</td><td>V 1994–2026 positions; MP 1991–2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's conditional frame (HD024096) is aligned with EU Common Position 2008/944/CFSP criteria 2 (human rights)</td><td>EU Common Position text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — Human-rights NGO support (Amnesty, Svenska Freds, Diakonia) is durable and organised</td><td>NGO historical pattern</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is absent — cannot form majority government opposition with only V+MP</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:228</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024091) is inconsistent with Sweden's Ukraine-support consensus (cross-party ~95%)</td><td>Ukraine lethal aid packages 2022-2025, all-party vote</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — Defence-industrial geographic concentration (Linköping/Saab, Karlskoga/BAE) means local S MPs face job-protection pressure</td><td>Constituency employment data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — Issue has fallen off top-10 voter priorities post-Ukraine invasion</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 issue salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Any future human-rights scandal involving Swedish platform in a recipient country (e.g., Saudi export controversy template) would vindicate MP's frame</td><td>Historical Saudi Arabia controversy</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — MP's end-user review demand could become standard-setting for European export-control modernisation</td><td>EU Common Position review cycle</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Defence-industry excess profits (Saab 22% margin 2024) could fuel populist "war profiteers" frame</td><td>Saab Q4 2024 earnings</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government narrative: "V+MP are unreliable NATO partners" for post-2026 negotiations</td><td>SD and M messaging template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Ukraine allied-support frame ("we help Ukraine by maintaining exports") is electorally dominant</td><td>Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Defence-industry layoff threats (implicit or explicit) during amendment negotiation</td><td>Saab/BAE historical lobbying</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — The Ukraine Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4172,7 +4172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference--the-ukraine-problem">5. TOWS Interference — Th
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The cluster's weakness is overwhelming — the <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference (S-absence + NATO-unreliability frame) defines the cluster as a non-decisive signalling event. The interpretive frontier is whether MP's end-user review language (HD024096) gets absorbed into the final UU committee report as a dissenting minority position — that would be the cluster's <strong>only</strong> concrete policy achievement.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6. International Comparison — End-User Controls Across NATO Allies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-international-comparison--end-user-controls-across-nato-allies">6.
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: MP's HD024096 "end-user review" demand is <strong>not an ideological outlier</strong> — it would move Sweden closer to Norway, Netherlands, and post-2024 Germany. Analysts should not report this as a fringe position; it is a mainstream Northern European stance.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4308,7 +4308,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix">7. Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AR1</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 passes without MP's end-user review language incorporated</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>UU minority reservation formalises V/MP position</td><td>UU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>AR2</td><td>Swedish arms used in future recipient-country human-rights incident; vindication for MP frame but reputational damage for Sweden</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Pre-emptive stricter end-user review</td><td>3–7 year horizon</td></tr><tr><td>AR3</td><td>V's total-rejection stance cited by SD as proof V "would abandon Ukraine"</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>V clarifies explicit Ukraine-support carveout</td><td>Ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>AR4</td><td>Defence-industry concentrated-layoff threats influence UU committee negotiations</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>6</strong></td><td>UU rapporteur independence; media transparency</td><td>UU negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>AR5</td><td>EU Common Position review (2027) adopts language closer to MP's position; Sweden needs to amend retroactively</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP's parliamentary record is usable precedent</td><td>2027+</td></tr><tr><td>AR6</td><td>Post-2026 coalition scenario requires V or MP support; HD024091/96 become negotiation vetoes</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>Map of alternative coalition configurations</td><td>Post-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4352,7 +4352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>UU rapporteur selection and draft report</strong></td><td>Any inclusion of end-user review language</td><td>May 2026</td><td>AR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Saab / BAE quarterly earnings</strong></td><td>Public commentary on political risk</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>AR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Svenska Freds annual export analysis</strong></td><td>Data-driven NGO critique</td><td>Annual</td><td>AR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU Common Position review</strong></td><td>Brussels-level policy changes</td><td>2027</td><td>AR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Post-election government-formation negotiations</strong></td><td>V/MP coalition conditions if applicable</td><td>Sep–Nov 2026</td><td>AR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         V["V · Håkan Svenneling&#x3C;br/>HD024091&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -4408,7 +4408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map">9. Stakeholder Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
     style Ukraine fill:#ffd700,color:#000
     style NATO_SEC fill:#003399,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Prop. 2025/26:228 will pass with both motions defeated</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>Coalition majority in UU; S non-filing removes only credible threat</td></tr><tr><td>MP's end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Comparative table §6</td></tr><tr><td>V's total rejection vs Ukraine-support coherence gap damages V's electoral standing by 0.5-1%</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Novus polling + Ukraine-support polling 2024-2026</td></tr><tr><td>Defence industry will publicly intervene in committee process</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Sweden's industry lobbying is usually quiet</td></tr><tr><td>Post-2026 V/MP coalition role includes defence-export renegotiation</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Depends on election outcome (P ≈ 0.35 for any V/MP influence)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 5 (defence-policy signalling)</li>
 <li><strong>Threat analysis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>../threat-analysis.md</code></a> T3 (arms export opposition)</li>
@@ -4463,7 +4463,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-deportation-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-deportation-cluster">deportation-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>DEPORT-CLUSTER-2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:235 — <em>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>All 2026-04-16 (same-day triple filing)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>9/10 (triple-party opposition, constitutional proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.80</strong> (9.0 ×0.98 — electoral-definitional axis per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (P1 policy with ECHR/proportionality stakes)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥈 <strong>CO-LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead framing</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This Cluster Matters Beyond Immigration Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics"></a></h3>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:235 expands the grounds on which non-citizens can be deported following a criminal conviction. It lowers the severity threshold, extends to categories of offence previously requiring repeat conviction, and shortens the procedural window for appeal. The government presents it as a <strong>flagship gäng-kriminalitet response</strong> — a direct continuation of the 2023–2025 organised-crime legislative arc.</p>
 <p>What makes this cluster analytically distinct from the reception-law cluster is that <strong>the three filed counter-motions occupy visibly different positions on the same proportionality axis</strong>, rather than agreeing on one frame. This is not a coordination failure — it is a <strong>deliberate triangulation</strong>, and it demonstrates more sophisticated parliamentary technique than the unified reception-law front:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -4528,7 +4528,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-matters-beyond-immigration-politics">1. Why This C
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Where the reception-law cluster is a <em>political</em> coordination achievement, the deportation cluster is a <em>legal-rhetorical</em> coordination achievement. The three frames map onto three possible judicial outcomes. This gives opposition parties a durable talking-points inventory for the full litigation lifecycle, not just the 2026 campaign cycle.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Three-Party Triangulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4569,7 +4569,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--three-party-triangulation">2. Evidence Table — Th
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Legal position</th><th align="center">ECHR alignment</th><th>Post-adoption litigation value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024090</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>Total rejection; law violates equal-protection principle</td><td align="center">Indirect (Art. 14)</td><td>Low — courts cannot strike down statute</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024095</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>Conditional — require "systematic repeated offences over time"</td><td align="center">Direct (Art. 8 proportionality)</td><td><strong>High</strong> — provides appeal template</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024097</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>Partial rejection — preserve 8 kap. 1–3 §; reject coercive expansion</td><td align="center">Indirect (procedural due process)</td><td>Medium — targets specific provisions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Triangulation analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The three motions can be read as a Russian-doll hierarchy of demands. If the government refuses all three, V's position is vindicated as "you see, nothing satisfies them"; if the government accepts C's proportionality test, MP's preservation is automatically satisfied; V loses electorally but gains legally. This structure means the opposition <strong>cannot lose everything</strong> from the filing — at minimum, it has established an evidentiary record for post-adoption challenges.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aware)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4647,7 +4647,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot-triangulation-aware">3. Cluster SWOT (Triangulation-Aw
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Triangulated frames survive hostile selective reporting; each paper can find a frame that suits its editorial line</td><td>HD024090 (DN), HD024095 (Expressen), HD024097 (Svenska Dagbladet)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — C's HD024095 aligns with Lagrådet's historical proportionality concerns on similar statutes</td><td>C's motion cites 8 kap. 1 § wording with proportionality test</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — MP's preservation logic (HD024097) is the most legally conservative — difficult to attack as obstructionist</td><td>MP explicitly preserves 8 kap. 1-3 §</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024090) anchors the cluster against any government "we met them halfway" framing</td><td>V's rejection text cites ECHR Art. 14 indirectly</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — S is notably absent from this cluster (filed nothing on prop. 2025/26:235)</td><td>Compare: S filed on reception, housing, fuel tax, healthcare — not deportation</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on deportation of convicted foreigners runs 70%+ in favour (SOM-institutet 2025)</td><td>SOM-institutet 2025 data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — SD campaign will cherry-pick V's HD024090 "Sweden should not deport criminals" framing</td><td>SD 2022 campaign template</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Post-adoption ECHR litigation in Strasbourg creates multi-year reputational drag on government</td><td>Pending Sweden ECHR cases backlog</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — C's proportionality frame may attract Liberal (L) backbench sympathy; splits Tidö</td><td>L historical position on rule-of-law issues</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Lagrådet yttrande may cite C's HD024095 language; elevates it from partisan motion to quasi-consensus</td><td>Lagrådet historically cites committee opposition</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — S's silence will be framed by opposition-internal critics as "S is too close to government on deportation" — fractures left</td><td>No S motion on prop. 2025/26:235</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Government argument that deportation is gäng-criminalitet response is electorally dominant (58% support, Novus)</td><td>Novus 2026-Q1 crime salience</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Administrative Court backlogs mean post-adoption challenges resolve only in 2027–2028</td><td>Sweden admin-court stats</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference — The "S Silence" Problem<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4682,7 +4682,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference--the-s-silence-problem">4. TOWS Interference —
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The "S silence" is the <strong>single most revealing signal</strong> in the motions cluster. S has prioritised welfare-state defence over legal-proportionality defence. This is a <strong>strategic choice</strong> that reveals S's 2026 campaign architecture: S intends to own the <em>economic</em> immigration narrative (integration, housing, anti-privatisation) while avoiding the <em>security</em> immigration narrative (deportation, border enforcement). Opposition-bloc analysts should note that this means S is not a reliable partner for ECHR-based challenges post-adoption.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>The government will argue that prop. 2025/26:235 is compatible with ECHR Article 8 (family life) because deportation for criminal conduct has been repeatedly upheld by the European Court of Human Rights when:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>The conduct is of sufficient gravity</li>
@@ -4740,7 +4740,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-echr-compatibility-analysis">5. ECHR Compatibility Analysis<a class
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Nordic and continental trend is <strong>towards</strong> statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 is therefore <strong>not a leftist/liberal outlier</strong> — it is a convergence move toward European best practice. Framing it as such in newsroom coverage would materially change the political economy of the motion.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4811,7 +4811,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">6. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DR1</td><td>Government rejects all three motions; law passes with expanded triggers; Sweden faces ECHR Strasbourg case within 36 months</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>15</strong></td><td>Litigation-ready record already in HD024097</td><td>Post-adoption Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR2</td><td>S-free zone in this cluster becomes durable opposition fracture — V+MP+C cannot form majority without S</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>16</strong></td><td>Requires S to file a motion on subsequent deportation legislation</td><td>2027 follow-on propositions</td></tr><tr><td>DR3</td><td>SD attack ads weaponise V's HD024090 "do not deport criminals" soundbite; V drops 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with crime-victim framing</td><td>Pre-election ad cycle Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>DR4</td><td>C's HD024095 is co-opted by government to add "systematic" qualifier; proportionality test dilutes in drafting</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C leadership must refuse dilutions; protect statutory test</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>DR5</td><td>Lagrådet explicitly cites C's proportionality frame in its yttrande; government is forced to amend</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>10</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr><tr><td>DR6</td><td>ECHR issues pilot-judgment against Sweden for disproportionate deportation practice</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center"><strong>5</strong></td><td>None (structural); but massive reputational impact</td><td>3–5 year horizon</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4855,7 +4855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:235</strong></td><td>Any reference to "proportionalitet" or "systematiska upprepade"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>DR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S follow-on motion</strong></td><td>S files motion on follow-on deportation legislation</td><td>2026–2027</td><td>DR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C leader interview on HD024095</strong></td><td>C party leader / Paarup-Petersen media appearance</td><td>Weekly from April 2026</td><td>DR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD ad campaign</strong></td><td>Content analysis of SD social ads for "V defends criminals" framing</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>DR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Administrative Court case filings</strong></td><td>Volume of deportation-order challenges post-adoption</td><td>Monthly 2027+</td><td>DR1, DR6</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Moves Whom"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph A["🏛️ Committee-Level Actors"]
         SfU["SfU rapporteur&#x3C;br/>(M/SD/KD)"]
@@ -4910,7 +4910,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-influence-network--who-moves-whom">8. Influence Network — "Who Mo
     style LAG fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style ECHR fill:#8e44ad,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertainties (Analyst Honest Self-Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4948,7 +4948,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-key-uncertainties-analyst-honest-self-assessment">9. Key Uncertaint
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Uncertainty</th><th align="right">Current prior</th><th>What would update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Will Lagrådet cite C's proportionality language?</td><td align="right">P = 0.40</td><td>Lagrådet historical pattern on committee motions</td></tr><tr><td>Will an L backbencher defect on HD024095?</td><td align="right">P = 0.15</td><td>Any public L statement on deportation</td></tr><tr><td>Will S file a deportation motion in 2026–2027 follow-on legislation?</td><td align="right">P = 0.55</td><td>S 2026 election platform language on crime</td></tr><tr><td>Will ECHR issue pilot judgment vs Sweden within 5 years?</td><td align="right">P = 0.25</td><td>Admin Court case volume after adoption</td></tr><tr><td>Will C's HD024095 survive SfU negotiation intact?</td><td align="right">P = 0.30</td><td>Rapporteur selection and amendment process</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 2 (triple-pressure immigration)</li>
 <li><strong>Related reception cluster</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>./reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
@@ -4967,7 +4967,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5015,7 +5015,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fuel-tax-cluster">fuel-tax-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>FUEL-CLUSTER-2026-04-15-17</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024098 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:236 — <em>Extra ändringsbudget: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Finansutskottet (FiU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-15 (S) · 2026-04-17 (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>8.3/10 (climate-fiscal contradiction)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>8.20</strong> (8.3 ×0.99 — fiscal/climate axis retains near-full weight; per canonical DIW v1.0 table in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2</strong> (P2 — sectoral policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🥉 <strong>SECONDARY</strong> story with electoral-narrative importance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is Strategically Important<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important"></a></h3>
 <p>The extra budget (<em>extra ändringsbudget</em>) is a mid-cycle supplementary fiscal instrument. Reducing fuel tax via an extra budget is unusual: extra budgets are traditionally reserved for crisis response (pandemic, war, natural disaster). Using one to cut fuel tax signals that the government either (a) believes current fuel prices are a <strong>genuine household-budget crisis</strong> or (b) is delivering an <strong>election-adjacent pocketbook signal</strong> to rural voters within the legal envelope of extra-budget practice.</p>
 <p>The analytic pivot is this: <strong>the fuel tax cut is the only government-policy item in the April 2026 opposition-motion cluster that the opposition can frame as unambiguously contradicting stated government commitments</strong> — in this case, Sweden's Paris Agreement trajectory and the government's own climate mandate under the 2017 Climate Act.</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5027,7 +5027,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-strategically-important">1. Why This Cluster Is
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cluster is a <em>second electoral pillar</em> for the opposition, independent of the immigration narrative. Opposition strategists will treat this as the <strong>"climate pillar"</strong> to complement the <strong>"humanitarian pillar"</strong> of the immigration clusters. The cluster's value is therefore not in defeating prop. 2025/26:236 (it will pass) but in <strong>building a durable campaign narrative for September 2026</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame Division<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5060,7 +5060,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--two-frame-division">2. Evidence Table — Two-Frame
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Primary frame</th><th>Secondary frame</th><th>Target voter segment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024082</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Mikael Damberg</td><td>Fiscal responsibility — "ineffective spending; return with better proposal"</td><td>Distributional — "tax cut disproportionately benefits higher incomes with larger vehicles"</td><td>Centre-left; suburban S voters</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024098</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Janine Alm Ericson</td><td>Climate coherence — "increases emissions; violates Paris and Climate Act trajectory"</td><td>Intergenerational — "shifts costs to future taxpayers via climate penalty"</td><td>Urban-green MP voters; young voters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Data note <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: An earlier draft of this dossier's <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> listed HD024092 as a third fuel-tax counter-motion. That reference was reconciled against the canonical filing index in <code>classification-results.md</code> and <code>data-download-manifest.md</code> (both of which list only HD024082 and HD024098), and removed. The cluster is definitively two-party (S + MP); arguments in this analysis that depend on cluster size are written to the two-party baseline.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-cluster-swot"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5138,7 +5138,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-cluster-swot">3. Cluster SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabinde
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Two complementary frames (fiscal + climate) cover centre-left and green voter bases without competition</td><td>HD024082 (fiscal), HD024098 (climate)</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — MP's climate frame is measurable: the cut adds ≈ 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e annually (Naturvårdsverket modelling)</td><td>Naturvårdsverket fuel-tax elasticity models</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — S's procedural "return with better proposal" framing is defensive — hard to attack as obstructionist</td><td>HD024082 motion text</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — Rural voters gain directly from the cut; S's HD024082 risks Norrland vote erosion</td><td>S rural-constituency 2022 results</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — Public opinion on fuel taxes is decisively negative (63% support any cut, Novus 2026-Q1)</td><td>Novus Q1 2026 polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — The cut is time-limited (extra budget framing) — reduces long-term climate-accountability leverage</td><td>Extra-budget procedural design</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's climate frame has limited resonance with voters prioritising cost-of-living (74% in Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus priority-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Climate frame aligns with EU Fit-for-55 and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) obligations; international-legitimacy authority for the opposition position</td><td>EU Climate Package</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Young voters (18–29) prioritise climate over fuel cost 52/48 (Ungdomsbarometern 2025); MP's frame captures this cohort</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern 2025</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — Naturskyddsföreningen / WWF / Fridays for Future coalition can amplify MP's frame via civil-society pressure</td><td>Environmental NGO activation patterns</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — Government can frame S+MP as "elitist" on cost-of-living — inverts S's traditional working-class brand</td><td>SD and M rural-voter messaging</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — Extra-budget vote is fast-tracked; opposition has ≤ 4 weeks to build narrative before vote</td><td>FiU fast-track procedure</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Transport-sector unions (Transportarbetareförbundet) may publicly split from S on this issue</td><td>Trade-union historical position</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Contradiction Quantification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Climate Act (<em>Klimatlagen 2017:720</em>) obligates the government to pursue policies consistent with the long-term goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 and interim targets:</p>
 
 
@@ -5167,7 +5167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-climate-fiscal-contradiction-quantification">4. Climate-Fiscal Cont
 <p><strong>Analytic claim <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The fuel tax cut moves Sweden <strong>further away</strong> from its 2030 Climate Act target, at a moment when the government is already ~20% behind that target. MP's HD024098 can cite this as a measurable, reviewable, court-testable obligation breach. In principle, under §5 of Klimatlagen, the government must explain to parliament if a policy measure is incompatible with the climate targets.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-tows-interference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5202,7 +5202,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-tows-interference">5. TOWS Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>W1 × T1</strong> interference is the crucial variable. If S does not front Norrland-anchored S MPs in the news cycle, SD will convert this into a "urban elite vs rural family" frame that costs S more electorally than MP's climate frame gains. Historical precedent: 2018 carbon-tax debate (France → Gilets Jaunes) — the lesson is that without a rural counter-offer, climate fiscal policy generates majority backlash.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax">6. Comparative Analysis — How Peer Climate-Committed Democracies Treat Fuel Tax<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-fuel-tax"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5261,7 +5261,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-comparative-analysis--how-peer-climate-committed-democracies-treat-
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of the seven jurisdictions analysed, <strong>only Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt is a direct precedent</strong> for Sweden's proposed cut, and Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong> because the electoral benefit did not materialise. The proposition is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong> — a point the opposition can cite in newsroom debate.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5323,7 +5323,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-risk-matrix-cluster-specific">7. Risk Matrix (Cluster-Specific)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FR1</td><td>Fuel tax cut passes; S loses 1–2% Norrland vote before 2026</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Deploy rural S MPs in media; counter-propose transit/EV subsidy</td><td>FiU vote May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR2</td><td>EU Commission initiates infringement proceedings against Sweden for Climate Act / Fit-for-55 backsliding</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>MP escalates via EU remissvar; green-MEP amplification</td><td>Post-adoption Q3-Q4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>FR3</td><td>Government narrative ("S and MP out of touch with rural Sweden") dominates 2-week news cycle</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Front rural MPs; counter-propose; attack distributional impact</td><td>Immediate post-filing</td></tr><tr><td>FR4</td><td>Transport unions break publicly from S, endorse government's cut</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>S-union dialogue pre-empting public statement</td><td>Within 14 days</td></tr><tr><td>FR5</td><td>Klimatpolitiska rådet issues critical report citing the cut</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>MP in remissvar amplifies Council findings</td><td>Annual report Q1 2027</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5373,7 +5373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-forward-indicators-1">8. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>FiU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which Fi committee MP gets the rapporteur</td><td>≤ 14 days</td><td>FR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norrland local-media coverage</strong></td><td>Content analysis of Sveriges Radio Norrbotten, NSD, NT</td><td>Weekly</td><td>FR1, FR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Transport union statement</strong></td><td>Public position from Transportarbetareförbundet</td><td>Within 21 days</td><td>FR4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Naturvårdsverket Q2 2026 climate report</strong></td><td>Quantified emissions impact estimate</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>FR2, FR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU DG CLIMA monitoring letter</strong></td><td>Any DG CLIMA comment on Swedish policy backsliding</td><td>Q3-Q4 2026</td><td>FR2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report</strong></td><td>Annual Swedish climate council assessment</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>FR5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph Parties["Filing Parties"]
         S["S · Mikael Damberg&#x3C;br/>HD024082&#x3C;br/>FISCAL"]
@@ -5429,7 +5429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-stakeholder-map-fuel-tax-cluster">9. Stakeholder Map (Fuel Tax Clus
     style EU_DG_CLIMA fill:#003399,color:#fff
     style KlimatR fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-confidence-self-assessment-1">10. Confidence Self-Assessment<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut adds 0.3–0.5 MtCO₂e/year</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Naturvårdsverket elasticity modelling</td></tr><tr><td>Government will pass the cut</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; Finance Ministry ownership</td></tr><tr><td>S loses ≥1% Norrland vote if rural counter-frame not deployed</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>2022 baseline + historical rural-fuel elasticity</td></tr><tr><td>MP's climate frame resonates with 18-29 voters > cost-of-living frame</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Ungdomsbarometern but priority framing effects</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission initiates infringement within 18 months</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>DG CLIMA politically cautious; Sweden in "monitoring" not "procedure" zone</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 3</li>
 <li><strong>Risk assessment</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>../risk-assessment.md</code></a> R03</li>
@@ -5484,7 +5484,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-11-cross-references-1">11. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -5536,7 +5536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-reception-law-cluster">reception-law-cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cluster ID</strong></td><td>RCPT-CLUSTER-2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member motions</strong></td><td>HD024076 (V), HD024080 (S), HD024087 (MP), HD024089 (C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target proposition</strong></td><td>prop. 2025/26:229 — <em>En ny mottagandelag</em></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Committee</strong></td><td>Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Filing dates</strong></td><td>2026-04-13 (V) · 2026-04-15 (S, MP, C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Raw Significance</strong></td><td>10/10 (unprecedented 4-party coordination)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>DIW Weighted Significance</strong></td><td><strong>9.40</strong> (×0.94 — electoral/policy axis, not constitutional)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth Tier</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> (per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 6 — multi-party coordination on P1 policy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role in dossier</strong></td><td>🏛️ <strong>LEAD</strong> story</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on lead selection</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has not seen <strong>all four major opposition parties</strong> (S, V, MP, C) file counter-motions against a single government proposition in a 72-hour window at any point in the current riksmöte. The last comparable four-party convergence on an immigration bill was the 2022 "Migration Package" debates — and even then, motions were staggered across a week and coordinated informally. The April 2026 reception-law cluster is <strong>tighter, more public, and more electorally framed</strong> than that precedent.</p>
 <p>Proposition 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) is the Tidö government's flagship asylum-reception reform. It replaces the 1994 reception act (<em>Lagen om mottagande av asylsökande m.fl.</em>) with a new architecture that:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -5551,7 +5551,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-this-cluster-is-the-lead-story">1. Why This Cluster Is the Lead
 <p><strong>Analyst framing <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: This is primarily a <em>campaign-narrative construction</em> cluster. The parties are building a broad, electorally legible anti-Tidö story on the dominant 2026 migration issue while preserving differentiated messages for their own voter coalitions (V's total rejection vs. C's proportionality test). A secondary hypothesis is that the cluster also functions as a limited <em>coalition-rehearsal</em> exercise: if the common line holds through chamber vote (expected June 2026), it modestly strengthens the case that a shared opposition front can be sustained after the election. Readers should treat coalition-rehearsal as contingent inference, not as the dominant operational logic.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table — Four-Party Division of Labour<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-evidence-table--four-party-division-of-labour">2. Evidence Table 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Party</th><th>Lead signatory</th><th>Committee</th><th>Rhetorical frame</th><th>Core demand</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD024076</strong></td><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Tony Haddou</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Rights-based rejection</em> — "asylum is a right, not a privilege to be earned"</td><td>Total rejection of the law; preserve pre-existing reception act</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024080</strong></td><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Ida Karkiainen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Welfare-state protection</em> — "asylum housing must not be privatised"</td><td>Remove private-operator provisions; return to parliament with a revised proposal that excludes private asylum housing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024087</strong></td><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Annika Hirvonen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>EU-compliance and humanitarian</em> — "Sweden cannot undercut the EU Pact's minimum standards"</td><td>Reject the law; invoke EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) integration minimums</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024089</strong></td><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>SfU</td><td><em>Administrative workability</em> — "reform is too fast, will break municipal capacity"</td><td>Amend the law; phase implementation; restore municipal discretion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Division-of-labour analysis <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Four motions, four distinct frames, one shared target. V takes the principled-left flank; S anchors the welfare-state case; MP internationalises via EU law; C occupies the pragmatist centre. A Tidö-aligned media response that attacks one frame (e.g., "V is soft on criminals") fails against the other three. This is <strong>defence-in-depth messaging</strong> — a hallmark of a coordinated opposition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5683,7 +5683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-four-party-swot-cluster-level">3. Four-Party SWOT (Cluster-Level)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strength 1</strong> — Unprecedented coordination demonstrates opposition discipline</td><td>HD024076/80/87/89 all filed within 72 hours on same prop.</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 2</strong> — Four distinct frames cover entire voter-coalition surface (left / welfare / international / pragmatist)</td><td>Rhetoric axis above</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 3</strong> — C's moderate frame (HD024089) insulates cluster from "obstructionism" attack</td><td>C demands amendment, not rejection</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strength 4</strong> — Publicly visible filing cadence creates sustained news cycle</td><td>4 separate newsroom events over 2 days</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 1</strong> — V's total rejection (HD024076) and C's amendment (HD024089) cannot co-govern — coalition is rhetorical, not programmatic</td><td>Compare HD024076 (reject) vs HD024089 (amend) texts</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 2</strong> — S filed HD024080 despite having governed 2014–2022 with successively stricter reception policy — legacy-credibility gap</td><td>S migration-policy shift 2015 (Löfven) → 2022</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 3</strong> — No cluster-wide joint statement or press conference released; coordination is visible but unclaimed</td><td>Absence of joint presser from S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weakness 4</strong> — MP's "EU compliance" frame has limited domestic traction (≤15% of voters cite EU law salience; Novus Q1 2026)</td><td>Novus survey 2026-Q1</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 1</strong> — Immigration cluster displaces government agenda for 2–3 news cycles, denying M/SD coverage of other wins</td><td>Expected media cycle post-filing</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 2</strong> — Post-2026 S+V+MP+C majority scenario (P≈0.15, see scenario-analysis.md) would allow reception-law repeal</td><td>Election prior analysis</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opportunity 3</strong> — C's amendment frame creates narrow negotiation channel with L (coalition centrist) — may split Tidö</td><td>L's historical press-freedom / integration posture</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 1</strong> — 62% voter support for stricter immigration (Novus 2026-Q1) means government owns the dominant narrative</td><td>Novus migration-salience polling</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 2</strong> — SD framing "opposition defends the unvetted" in attack ads will resonate with 2022 SD voters (20% of electorate)</td><td>SD 2022 election data</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threat 3</strong> — Legal-aid and housing NGOs may publicly split if S's private-operator carve-out passes into the amended law</td><td>Anticipated Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS Interference Matrix — The Strategic Centre of Gravity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5718,7 +5718,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-tows-interference-matrix--the-strategic-centre-of-gravity">4. TOWS
 <p><strong>Strategic centre of gravity <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The interference <strong>W1 × T1</strong> — the rhetorical incompatibility between V's rejection and C's amendment under a dominant government narrative — is the <strong>single most consequential variable</strong> for whether this cluster converts into durable 2026 electoral advantage. If the four parties can stage-manage the SfU vote sequence (amendment → rejection), the cluster holds. If they cannot, the government's "disarray" frame wins.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative International Positioning (brief)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's proposed reception-law architecture is not unprecedented in Europe, but the <strong>combination</strong> of private-sector operation + time-limited benefits + activation duties is on the restrictive end of EU practice.</p>
 
 
@@ -5779,7 +5779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-comparative-international-positioning-brief">5. Comparative Interna
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: The private-operation provision is the <strong>distinctive outlier</strong>. Only Germany (via Länder-level discretion) offers a close parallel, and Germany's CDU/CSU–SPD governance has maintained active oversight of private operators. The opposition's privatisation-focus in HD024080 is therefore <strong>well-aligned with comparative best practice</strong> — it attacks the provision that deviates most from Nordic peers. See <code>comparative-international.md</code> §1 for full analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5841,7 +5841,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-risk-table-cluster-specific">6. Risk Table (Cluster-Specific)<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>R#</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L (1-5)</th><th align="center">I (1-5)</th><th align="center">L×I</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RR1</td><td>Law passes with private-operator provision intact; S's HD024080 frame fails electorally</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>20</strong></td><td>S must convert housing-privatisation into "welfare-privatisation" umbrella frame</td><td>SfU vote, expected May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR2</td><td>Law challenged at Administrative Court on EU Pact compatibility grounds; ECJ referral possible</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Government legal review shows Pact alignment; MP's HD024087 frame anchors challenge</td><td>Post-adoption legal challenge Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR3</td><td>V's total rejection (HD024076) is singled out in SD attack ads as "pro-illegal-immigration" stance; V loses 1–2 polling points</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center"><strong>8</strong></td><td>V must pair rejection with border-capacity-building alternatives</td><td>SD campaign Q2-Q3 2026</td></tr><tr><td>RR4</td><td>C's amendment frame (HD024089) is co-opted by government to add minor changes and claim consensus</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center"><strong>9</strong></td><td>C's leadership must refuse any amendment that preserves private-operator core</td><td>SfU amendment negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>RR5</td><td>Lagrådet yttrande on prop. 2025/26:229 identifies ECHR Art. 8 concerns (family unity); opposition gains legal authority for its position</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Monitor Lagrådet published opinions</td><td>Pending Lagrådet release</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-forward-indicators-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5891,7 +5891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-forward-indicators-1">7. Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Signal to watch</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Updates which risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SfU rapporteur selection</strong></td><td>Which M/SD/KD MP gets the rapporteur role</td><td>Within 14 days</td><td>RR1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Lagrådet yttrande on 2025/26:229</strong></td><td>Public release; look for references to "privat aktör" and "rättssäkerhet"</td><td>Q2 2026</td><td>RR2, RR5</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Joint opposition press statement</strong></td><td>Four-leader joint presser — holds vs fails coordination</td><td>May 2026</td><td>W1 mitigation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Novus migration salience</strong></td><td>Monthly tracking; focus on "is private asylum housing acceptable?" split</td><td>Monthly 2026</td><td>RR1, RR3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L internal debate</strong></td><td>Any L MP (especially Pehrson, Sofia Zettergren) breaking on amendments</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>O3</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Röda Korset / Rädda Barnen remissvar</strong></td><td>Published NGO positions on private-operator carve-out</td><td>May–June 2026</td><td>Threat 3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Reception-Law Cluster)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Filers["🗳️ Filing Parties (coordination front)"]
         V["V · HD024076&#x3C;br/>Tony Haddou&#x3C;br/>REJECTION"]
@@ -5949,7 +5949,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-stakeholder-map-reception-law-cluster">8. Stakeholder Map (Receptio
     style KD fill:#6f42c1,color:#fff
     style L fill:#fd7e14,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-confidence-self-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -5992,7 +5992,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-confidence-self-assessment">9. Confidence Self-Assessment<a class="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Four-party coordination is unprecedented in 2025/26 riksmöte</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>Filing-date analysis from riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code></td></tr><tr><td>Cluster is lead story of the news-motions run for 2026-04-20</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td><td>DIW weighting + media-attention scoring</td></tr><tr><td>Law will pass despite cluster (prior P ≈ 0.85)</td><td align="center">🟦 VERY HIGH</td><td>M/SD/KD/L majority; no defection signal</td></tr><tr><td>C's amendment frame will convert 1–2 L MPs to support</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>L internal divisions historically exist but rarely break Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster will shift Novus migration-issue salience by 2–4 points over 2 weeks</td><td align="center">🟧 MEDIUM</td><td>Historical post-filing polling shifts on high-salience issues</td></tr><tr><td>S+V+MP+C can form post-2026 majority government</td><td align="center">🟥 LOW</td><td>Current polling: S+V+MP+C ≈ 42–45%; would require gains</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-10-cross-references-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cluster-level synthesis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a> Finding 1</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference map</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a> §Cross-Party Alignment</li>
@@ -6009,7 +6009,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-10-cross-references-1">10. Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6045,7 +6045,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:55 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Translate the April 2026 opposition coordination into 349-seat arithmetic — which governing combinations become more or less viable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Novus April 2026 trend, SCB-SOM Autumn 2025, Val.se 2022 result, Riksdagen seat distribution</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH on current chamber maths · 🟧 MEDIUM on post-election projections (election 5 months away)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic Is the Missing Analytical Layer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT, scenario, and risk artifacts answer <em>what</em> and <em>why</em>. They do not answer the operational question every editor, civil servant, and foreign desk needs: <strong>which governments are and are not possible after September 2026, and how does the April wave change those numbers?</strong></p>
 <p>This artifact provides:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -6056,7 +6056,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-arithmetic-is-the-missing-analytical-layer">1. Why Arithmetic I
 <li>Explicit propagation of the April-wave polling delta (from <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3).</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber Arithmetic (2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6113,8 +6113,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-current-chamber-arithmetic-2022-election-result">2. Current Chamber
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">2022 seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S</strong> — Socialdemokraterna</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD</strong> — Sverigedemokraterna</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Government support (Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>M</strong> — Moderaterna</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong> — Vänsterpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong> — Centerpartiet</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>KD</strong> — Kristdemokraterna</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong> — Miljöpartiet</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L</strong> — Liberalerna</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h3>
-<h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-majority-threshold-175-seats">Majority threshold: <strong>175 seats</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-majority-threshold-175-seats"></a></h4>
+<h4 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-bloc-sums"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6145,7 +6145,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-current-bloc-sums">Current bloc sums<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Key structural fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The Tidö majority is <strong>+1 seat</strong> — the narrowest plausible governing majority. A single by-election loss, party-switch, or suspension collapses it. The opposition is <strong>2 seats short</strong> — within polling sampling error. April 2026 is therefore happening in a <strong>genuinely contested</strong> chamber, not a safe-government context.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projection from April 2026 Polling (Pre-Wave)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Using the Novus April 2026 mid-month average (before publication of any April-wave polling effect):</p>
 
 
@@ -6210,7 +6210,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-seat-projection-from-april-2026-polling-pre-wave">3. Seat-Projectio
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>4-percent threshold warning <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: L at 4.3 % is <strong>within the ±1.5 pp Novus sampling band</strong> of the 4.0 % Riksdag threshold. A single bad polling month pushes L below; if L misses the threshold its seats redistribute (≈ 15 of the 16 flow to M/KD/SD under Sainte-Laguë). This is the <strong>single largest single-party uncertainty</strong> in the 2026 election.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6241,7 +6241,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-pre-wave-bloc-projection">Pre-wave bloc projection<a class="" aria-hi
 <p><strong>Inversion finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 pre-wave polling already projects a <strong>~23-seat opposition majority</strong> — a 26-seat swing from the 2022 +1 Tidö majority. If these polling numbers survive to election day, the Tidö bloc <strong>cannot form a government</strong> without a realignment involving C.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta — Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied"></a></h3>
 <p>From <code>historical-baseline.md</code> §3, the base-rate prior from comparable election-year waves is a <strong>−1.3 pp median shift against the government</strong> in the three weeks following a ≥ 10-motion coordinated opposition wave. Applying that prior to the April 2026 polling baseline:</p>
 
 
@@ -6295,8 +6295,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-april-wave-polling-delta--applied">4. April-Wave Polling Delta —
 <p><strong>Decision-useful takeaway <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Across <em>every</em> plausible polling-delta scenario derived from the historical base rate, <strong>the opposition projected seat total remains ≥ 200</strong> and the Tidö total <strong>remains ≤ 160</strong>. The April wave does not create an opposition majority; <strong>it widens an opposition majority that already existed in pre-wave polling</strong>. The correct framing is "opposition widens lead" not "opposition gains lead".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix">5. Post-2026 Coalition Possibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-post-2026-coalition-possibility-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ = mathematically possible (≥ 175 seats) AND politically plausible (no ruled-out blocks)</li>
 <li>🟧 = mathematically possible but requires political compromises with declared ruled-out actors</li>
@@ -6364,12 +6364,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-notation">Notation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Coalition</th><th align="center">Seats (median delta)</th><th align="center">Viability</th><th>Political barriers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><strong>S + V + MP</strong> (red-green classic)</td><td align="center">119 + 34 + 19 = <strong>172</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (3 short)</td><td>None intrinsic; needs C tolerance</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><strong>S + V + MP + C</strong> (4-party opposition bloc)</td><td align="center">172 + 26 = <strong>198</strong></td><td align="center">✅</td><td>C historically ruled out V; Sep 2025 Muharrem Demirok signalled conditional openness on migration</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><strong>S + C</strong> (grand-centre minority with SD tolerance? — politically toxic for S)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 = <strong>145</strong></td><td align="center">❌</td><td>Below threshold; SD support unthinkable for S</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><strong>S + C + MP</strong> (excluding V)</td><td align="center">119 + 26 + 19 = <strong>164</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (11 short)</td><td>Would need V tolerance, back to #2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><strong>Tidö-continued</strong> (M + KD + L + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 16 + 65 = <strong>160</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (15 short)</td><td>Below threshold under April polling</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td><strong>Tidö + L replaced by C</strong> (M + KD + C + SD)</td><td align="center">62 + 17 + 26 + 65 = <strong>170</strong></td><td align="center">❌ (5 short)</td><td>C has ruled out SD cooperation; would implode C</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td><strong>"Grand coalition" S + M</strong></td><td align="center">119 + 62 = <strong>181</strong></td><td align="center">🟧</td><td>No mainstream support in either party; historically unprecedented in Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-implication">Key implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implication"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Most probable post-2026 government <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>Scenario #2 (S + V + MP + C)</strong> is the <strong>only mathematically viable AND politically plausible</strong> configuration under current polling. The April 2026 opposition wave has a specific effect: it <strong>demonstrates operational capacity for exactly this configuration</strong> ahead of post-election negotiations. Whether intentional or not, the wave functions as <strong>coalition-capability signalling</strong> to C's own voters and party apparatus.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Point<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point"></a></h3>
 <p>Scenario #2's viability depends entirely on C's willingness to sit in government with V — a boundary C has historically policed strongly. The April wave provides <strong>three data points on C's posture</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-the-centrepartiet-c-pivot-point">6. The Centrepartiet (C) Pivot Poi
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Interpretation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: C's filing pattern is <strong>consistent with conditional post-election cooperation, not fusion</strong>. It signals "we can govern with them on issue-by-issue basis" not "we are a bloc with them". This is exactly the <strong>tolerated minority-government</strong> arithmetic that has characterised Swedish politics since 2014 (Löfven I S-MP with V tolerance; Löfven II S-MP-C-L decemberöverenskommelse; Andersson S minority with V tolerance).</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational form (most probable)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Cabinet</strong>: S + MP (two-party cabinet, ~138 seats represented)</li>
 <li><strong>Budget confidence</strong>: V + C tolerate with <strong>policy-specific red lines</strong> (V on welfare spending, C on fiscal discipline)</li>
@@ -6409,7 +6409,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-2-operational-form-most-probable">Scenario #2 operational fo
 <li><strong>Stability forecast</strong>: 🟧 MEDIUM — comparable to Löfven II (survived ~3 years before early-triggered crisis)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>Observations that will update the posterior on scenario #2 during the remaining five months to the election:</p>
 
 
@@ -6456,7 +6456,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-watch-indicators--mayseptember-2026">7. Watch Indicators — May–
 <p><strong>Most informative single indicator <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>The June 2026 chamber vote on the April motion cluster.</strong> If S+V+MP+C vote together on even 3 of the 7 clusters, scenario #2 prior rises to ≥ 0.70. If the cluster fractures below 2, scenario #2 prior falls to ≤ 0.45 and the election becomes more genuinely contested.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity — What Could Invalidate This Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -6499,7 +6499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-sensitivity--what-could-invalidate-this-analysis">8. Sensitivity 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Invalidating event</th><th>Effect</th><th>Re-run trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>L drops below 4 % in two consecutive polls</strong></td><td>Tidö loses 15+ seats; opposition math widens further</td><td>Update bloc totals immediately</td></tr><tr><td><strong>L recovers to ≥ 5 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~5 seats; still short but not decisively</td><td>Revise seat table</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD surge to ≥ 22 %</strong></td><td>Tidö math improves by ~12 seats; scenario #5 re-enters 🟧 range</td><td>Add scenario #5 detail</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S–V open split (V declares no tolerance)</strong></td><td>Scenario #2 collapses to scenario #1 (172 seats, short); deadlock</td><td>Major revision</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C joins centre-right talks post-election</strong></td><td>Scenario #6 moves from ❌ to 🟧; six-way negotiation</td><td>Rework §5 fully</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Early-election trigger before Sep 2026</strong></td><td>Entire framework re-baselines</td><td>Not expected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Confidence-Weighted Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> The Tidö government has already lost its projected majority under April 2026 polling — <strong>before</strong> the wave polling effect is applied.</li>
 <li><strong>[HIGH]</strong> Scenario #2 (S+V+MP+C cooperation) is the only viable post-election government configuration and the April wave is consistent with capability-signalling for it.</li>
@@ -6508,7 +6508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-9-summary--three-confidence-weighted-claims">9. Summary — Three Con
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Reviewer note</strong>: seat projections use Sainte-Laguë allocation with 4 % threshold; the Novus April mid-month average is the baseline. Update this file when the May 20, 2026 polls are published. The <code>historical-baseline.md</code> polling-delta priors feed directly into §4 here.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -6543,11 +6543,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Why this matters</strong>: ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 Rule 8 mandates international benchmarking for P0/P1 documents on policy reform. Three of the four April 2026 opposition-motion clusters meet that threshold. Without comparative context, Swedish-domestic framing becomes self-referential and obscures whether the government's reforms are inside or outside the Nordic/EU policy mainstream.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties">🧭 Section 1 — Asylum-Reception Law: Privatisation and Activation Duties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-1--asylum-reception-law-privatisation-and-activation-duties"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:229 (<em>En ny mottagandelag</em>) combines centralised Migrationsverket-run facilities, private-sector operation, time-limited benefits, and activation duties. Four opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024076/80/87/89). S's HD024080 specifically attacks <strong>private-sector operation</strong>. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6638,7 +6638,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-11-reception-architecture-comparator">1.1 Reception-Architecture Comp
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>private-operation provision</strong> is the <strong>distinctive Swedish outlier</strong> relative to Nordic peers. Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Netherlands all operate state-centred reception without private sub-contracting of housing. Germany permits private operation <strong>under Länder-level oversight</strong> — this is the closest parallel, but it exists because of German federalism, not by design. Austria briefly experimented with BBU-GmbH (state-owned limited company) and private sub-contracting; the experiment generated repeated public scandals over housing conditions (2018–2021) and Austria has since rolled back private contracts. <strong>S's HD024080 anti-privatisation frame is therefore aligned with comparative best practice, not ideological outlier</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum (2024) Compatibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility"></a></h4>
 <p>The EU Pact (Regulation 2024/1347 Asylum Procedures + 2024/1348 Reception Conditions) sets <strong>minimum standards</strong> for reception, including:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Article 17: material reception conditions must "ensure adequate standard of living"</li>
@@ -6650,11 +6650,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-12-eu-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-2024-compatibility">1.2 EU Pact on
 <p><strong>MP's HD024087 argument <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Explicitly invokes the EU Pact, arguing the new reception law's private-operator provisions risk non-compliance with Art. 17 (material conditions). <strong>Comparative strength</strong>: The Austrian BBU experience shows private operators generated documented non-compliance with exactly this article. MP's legal frame is therefore evidence-supported.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality">🧭 Section 2 — Criminal Deportation Proportionality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-2--criminal-deportation-proportionality"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:235 expands deportation triggers for non-citizens convicted of crimes. Three opposition parties filed counter-motions (HD024090/95/97). C's HD024095 demands <strong>statutory proportionality testing</strong> ("systematic repeated offences over time"). Does this align with European practice?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6734,17 +6734,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-21-proportionality-test-comparator">2.1 Proportionality-Test Comparat
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The <strong>statutory proportionality test is the modal European approach</strong>. Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, UK, and Belgium all codify deportation-proportionality criteria in legislation, not administrative guidance. <strong>C's HD024095 therefore converges with the European statutory mainstream</strong> — framing it as a leftist or liberal outlier would be factually incorrect. It is a rule-of-law convergence proposal.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation">2.2 Adverse-Judgment Correlation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-22-adverse-judgment-correlation"></a></h4>
 <p>Statutory-test jurisdictions (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) have <strong>lower adverse ECtHR judgment counts</strong> (mean 1.67) than administrative-test jurisdictions (Sweden, Norway: mean 3.5). The correlation is not perfectly causal — ECtHR caseload also depends on litigation capacity — but <strong>statutory specificity does correlate with fewer successful Strasbourg challenges</strong>, which is in the government's own interest.</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Reportable fact <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The government's legal case for prop. 2025/26:235 would be <em>strengthened</em>, not weakened, by adopting C's HD024095 proportionality language. Opposition editors may use this in newsroom interviews.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories">🧭 Section 3 — Fuel Tax Cuts and Climate Act Trajectories<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-3--fuel-tax-cuts-and-climate-act-trajectories"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:236 cuts fuel taxes via an <em>extra ändringsbudget</em>. S (HD024082) attacks fiscal framing; MP (HD024098) attacks climate coherence. How does this compare to peer climate-committed democracies 2022–2026?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6802,7 +6802,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-31-peer-jurisdiction-fuel-tax-policy">3.1 Peer-Jurisdiction Fuel-Tax
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Of six peer jurisdictions, <strong>only Germany (2022 Tankrabatt)</strong> is a direct precedent for Sweden's proposed cut. Germany <strong>did not extend it</strong>, and the measure is now cited in German policy discourse as an unproductive use of fiscal space that did not buy political goodwill. The Swedish government is therefore <strong>betting against European comparative experience</strong>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6849,11 +6849,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-32-climate-law-enforcement-comparators">3.2 Climate-Law Enforcement C
 <p><strong>Analytic implication <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Sweden's climate-law mechanism is <strong>weaker than Germany, Netherlands, UK, and France</strong> in enforceability. MP's HD024098 cannot easily convert to a <em>Urgenda</em>-style court challenge. The political-accountability route (Klimatpolitiska rådet annual report) is the only credible path. Opposition analysts should manage expectations accordingly.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls">🧭 Section 4 — Arms-Export End-User Controls<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-4--arms-export-end-user-controls"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: prop. 2025/26:228 modernises Sweden's arms-export framework post-NATO accession. V (HD024091) rejects totally; MP (HD024096) demands end-user review. Where does this place Sweden?</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -6948,7 +6948,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-41-end-user-control-regime-comparator">4.1 End-User Control Regime Co
 <p><strong>Comparative insight <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: <strong>MP's HD024096 end-user review language is mainstream Northern European</strong> (aligned with Norway, Netherlands, post-2021 Germany). It is <strong>not</strong> an outlier, ideological, or anti-defence position. Opposition newsroom framing should reflect this: "MP asks Sweden to match Norwegian practice" is more accurate than "MP demands unprecedented restrictions".</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions">🧭 Section 5 — Aggregate Comparative Placement of April 2026 Opposition Motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Opposition Motions — Comparative Benchmarking Position
     x-axis "More Restrictive than Peers" --> "More Permissive than Peers"
@@ -6972,7 +6972,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-5--aggregate-comparative-placement-of-april-2026-opposition-
 <p><strong>Visualisation reading <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Seven of the ten cluster motions cluster in the <strong>evidence-supported mainstream quadrant</strong> (top-left) — aligned with Nordic/EU peer practice and supported by measurable data. Three V motions (total-rejection positions) sit in the <strong>ideological outlier</strong> quadrant — not because they are empirically wrong, but because V does not provide a bridge to administrative practice.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6 — Reportable Comparative Facts for Newsroom<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7010,7 +7010,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-6--reportable-comparative-facts-for-newsroom">🧭 Section 6
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Finding</th><th>Reportable statement</th><th align="center">Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Private asylum housing</td><td>"Of six Nordic/EU peers, only Germany (via Länder discretion) operates similar private-reception contracting. Austria rolled it back after 2018–2021 scandals."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal deportation proportionality</td><td>"Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, UK, and Denmark all use statutory proportionality tests. C's HD024095 converges with European practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cuts</td><td>"The only peer jurisdiction that cut fuel taxes in 2022–2026 (Germany's Tankrabatt) did not extend the cut due to poor electoral payoff."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export end-user review</td><td>"MP's HD024096 end-user review language matches Norwegian, Dutch, and post-2021 German practice."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-law enforcement</td><td>"Sweden's climate-law mechanism is weaker than Germany's, which produced the 2021 BVerfG ruling forcing emission cuts."</td><td align="center">🟩 HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-7--methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Most-similar design</strong> applied for Nordic comparators (DK, NO, FI) — small open-economy parliamentary democracies with welfare states.</li>
 <li><strong>Most-different design</strong> applied for UK, France, Germany — testing whether policy effects replicate across structurally different systems.</li>
@@ -7024,7 +7024,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--section-7--methodology-notes">🧭 Section 7 — Methodology Notes<a
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--cross-references-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (cluster-specific comparison)</li>
 <li><code>deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code> §5 (ECHR alignment)</li>
@@ -7036,11 +7036,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--cross-references-6">📎 Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Next Review</strong>: 2026-04-27</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:02 UTC | <strong>Data Depth</strong>: SUMMARY (MCP get_motioner)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-document-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7290,7 +7290,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-document-classification-overview">🗂️ Document Classification
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dok_id</th><th>Motion Nr</th><th>Title (EN)</th><th>Party</th><th>Committee</th><th>Domain</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Urgency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024080</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4080</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>S</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024087</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4087</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024089</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4089</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024076</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4076</td><td>Counter to new reception law</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024090</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4090</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>V</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4097</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules</td><td>MP</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4095</td><td>Counter to stricter deportation rules (partial)</td><td>C</td><td>SfU</td><td>Immigration/Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024077</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4077</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>V</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024079</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4079</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>S</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024086</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4086</td><td>Counter to time-limited immigrant housing</td><td>MP</td><td>AU</td><td>Integration/Housing</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD024082</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4082</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>S</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD024098</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4098</td><td>Counter to fuel tax cut extra budget</td><td>MP</td><td>FiU</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD024078</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4078</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>S</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024084</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4084</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>V</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024085</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4085</td><td>Crime victim compensation law</td><td>MP</td><td>CU</td><td>Justice</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD024081</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4081</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>S</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD024083</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4083</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>V</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD024094</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4094</td><td>Municipal healthcare medical competence</td><td>C</td><td>SoU</td><td>Healthcare</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD024091</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4091</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>V</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD024096</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4096</td><td>Arms export regulation</td><td>MP</td><td>UU</td><td>Defense/Export</td><td>🟡 SENSITIVE</td><td>🟠 URGENT</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>HD024088</td><td>mot. 2025/26:4088</td><td>Consumer credit law</td><td>C</td><td>CU</td><td>Finance/Consumer</td><td>🟢 PUBLIC</td><td>🟡 STANDARD</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-by-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Opposition Motions by Policy Domain (April 14-17, 2026)
     "Immigration/Integration" : 10
     "Fiscal/Climate" : 2
@@ -7299,7 +7299,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--classification-by-policy-domain">📊 Classification by Policy Domai
     "Defense/Arms Export" : 2
     "Finance/Consumer" : 1</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--committee-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     A[21 Opposition Motions&#x3C;br/>April 14-17, 2026] --> B[SfU: 7 motions&#x3C;br/>🔴 Immigration Cluster]
     A --> C[AU: 3 motions&#x3C;br/>🟠 Integration Housing]
@@ -7315,7 +7315,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--committee-distribution">🎯 Committee Distribution<a class="" aria-
     style F fill:#69db7c,color:#000
     style G fill:#ffa94d,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activity Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-party-activity-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7383,22 +7383,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-opposition-party-activity-matrix">🏛️ Opposition Party Activi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>SfU</th><th>AU</th><th>CU</th><th>SoU</th><th>FiU</th><th>UU</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>S (Socialdemokraterna)</strong></td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td><strong>5</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V (Vänsterpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP (Miljöpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C (Centerpartiet)</strong></td><td>2</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td><strong>4</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>7</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>4</strong></td><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>21</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-classification-findings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-classification-findings">📌 Key Classification Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-classification-findings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-">1. Coordinated Opposition on Immigration (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-coordinated-opposition-on-immigration-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>All four major opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed motions on <strong>three simultaneous immigration-related propositions</strong> — a coordinated response not seen since the 2022 Migration Package debates. This signals a deliberate opposition strategy to frame immigration as the central political battleground before the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-">2. Cross-Ideological Consensus on Fuel Tax Opposition (HIGH Confidence 🟩)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-cross-ideological-consensus-on-fuel-tax-opposition-high-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>Both S (center-left) and MP (Green) oppose the government's fuel tax cut in prop. 2025/26:236. This unusual alignment of economic-left and climate-green parties creates a unified messaging opportunity: the government is both economically irresponsible (S) and climate-damaging (MP).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-">3. Arms Export — Hard Opposition from Left/Green Bloc (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export--hard-opposition-from-leftgreen-bloc-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>V and MP both reject prop. 2025/26:228 on arms export regulation, continuing a consistent pattern of opposing Sweden's post-2022 defense-industrial pivot. With NATO membership now settled, this opposition has limited practical effect but strong electoral signaling value for their core voters.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-">4. Healthcare Competence — Three-Party Rejection (MEDIUM Confidence 🟧)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-healthcare-competence--three-party-rejection-medium-confidence-"></a></h4>
 <p>The unusual alignment of S, V, and C against prop. 2025/26:216 (municipal healthcare medical competence) reflects a substantive policy disagreement about regulatory design, not just partisan positioning.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-20 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26 | <strong>Analyst</strong>: news-motions workflow
 <strong>Analysis Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-20 13:08 UTC</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--document-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-network">🔗 Document Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -7472,7 +7472,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-proposition--motion-cross-reference">Proposition → Motion Cross-Ref
 <p><strong>Scope note</strong>: The table above is restricted to the canonical 21-motion April 14–17 opposition set filed against government propositions. Related parliamentary items (e.g., skr. 2025/26:226 on Sida humanitarian aid and its follow-on motions HD024070 / HD024072) fall outside this dossier's scope and are tracked in a separate skrivelse analysis.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-interdependency-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     subgraph Immigration["🏠 Immigration Policy Cluster"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>New Reception Law]
@@ -7504,8 +7504,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-motion-interdependency-network">🕸️ Motion Interdependency Ne
     Immigration -->|security context| Defense
     P222 -->|enforcement side| P235</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--party-coordination-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-party-coordination-analysis">📊 Party Coordination Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-coordination-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Alignment (same proposition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph AllFour["All 4 Opposition Parties"]
         P229[prop. 2025/26:229&#x3C;br/>Reception Law&#x3C;br/>S+V+MP+C]
@@ -7532,8 +7532,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-party-motion-alignment-same-proposition">Cross-Party Motion Ali
     style TwoParties fill:#ffd43b,color:#000
     style OneParty fill:#69db7c,color:#000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--previous-period-cross-references"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-period-cross-references">🔗 Previous Period Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-period-cross-references"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions from Last Run (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 <p>The April 14–17 motions build on the April 15–17 batch covered in the previous run:</p>
 
 
@@ -7561,14 +7561,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-connection-to-motions-from-last-run-2026-04-17">Connection to Motions
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Previous Motion</th><th>Today's Related Motion</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024090–HD024097 (April 16)</td><td>Today's April 14-15 motions</td><td>Same policy packages, earlier filings</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097 (MP, deportation)</td><td>HD024090 (V, deportation)</td><td>Parallel rejection strategies</td></tr><tr><td>HD024093 (C, cybersecurity)</td><td>HD024095 (C, deportation)</td><td>C's consistent "more analysis needed" framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte">Policy Continuity from Previous Riksmöte<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-continuity-from-previous-riksmöte"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>The immigration motions continue opposition strategy from 2024/25 riksmöte when similar restrictions were resisted</li>
 <li>V's complete rejection pattern (HD024090, HD024091) mirrors V's consistent "no" to all security-related legislation since 2022</li>
 <li>MP's partial acceptance approach (HD024097 preserving parts of deportation law) shows MP learning from 2022 when total rejections cost them parliamentary representation</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cross-Reference to Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7601,7 +7601,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--analytical-cross-reference-to-economic-context">📊 Analytical Cros
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion Cluster</th><th>Economic Context Link</th><th>Data Point</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Immigration motions (HD024076/80/87/89)</td><td>Unemployment rising to 8.69% (2025) increases political salience</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax motions (HD024082/98)</td><td>Sweden GDP growth only 0.82% (2024), down from 5.2% (2021)</td><td>World Bank NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG 2024</td></tr><tr><td>Housing motions (HD024077/79/86)</td><td>Integration impacts long-term labour supply; unemployment context</td><td>World Bank SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS 2025</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export (HD024091/96)</td><td>Sweden's defence spending 2.1% GDP (2025) post-NATO</td><td>NATO benchmarking context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Connections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-cross-reference-connections"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>SfU Hearings</strong> (May 2026): All immigration motions will be heard in Social Affairs Committee — expect testimony from Röda Korset, UNHCR Sweden</li>
 <li><strong>FiU Budget Vote</strong> (May 2026): Fuel tax extra budget — HD024082/98 will be voted down but provide campaign material</li>
@@ -7609,7 +7609,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--forward-cross-reference-connections">🔭 Forward Cross-Reference Co
 <li><strong>CIA Platform connection</strong>: Voting records for these motions will appear at <a href="https://hack23.github.io/cia/">https://hack23.github.io/cia/</a> when chamber votes occur (June 2026)</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7641,7 +7641,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Li
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Reference-exemplar self-audit per ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 §Reference Standards</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Framework versions</strong></td><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 · DIW v1.0 · Political Risk Matrix v2.0 · Political SWOT v2.2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Iterations</strong></td><td>Pass 1 (2026-04-20 13:10 UTC) → Pass 2 (2026-04-20 14:00 UTC) — both complete</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Depth achieved</strong></td><td><strong>L2+</strong> on LEAD + co-LEAD clusters; <strong>L2</strong> on tertiary clusters; L1 on baseline artifacts</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data provenance</strong></td><td>Public Riksdagen API · SCB · Novus · SOM-institutet · World Bank · EU Pact documents · RSF · V-Dem · ECtHR HUDOC · national climate-law texts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Checked against ai-driven-analysis-guide v5.1 rules 1–10.</p>
 
 
@@ -7717,7 +7717,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-rule-compliance-matrix">1. Rule Compliance Matrix<a class="" aria-h
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rule</th><th>Requirement</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Every claim cites dok_id / named actor / vote count / primary source</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>200+ dok_id references; named politicians in all clusters</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Confidence labels on every major claim</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><code>[HIGH]</code> / <code>[MEDIUM]</code> / <code>[LOW]</code> applied throughout</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Mermaid diagrams with accessible (color-contrast 4.5:1) palettes</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>15+ diagrams; all use cyberpunk-theme-compliant colours</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Quantified risk (L × I × score × ALARP band)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> 15 risks scored</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Multi-framework triangulation (SWOT + STRIDE/MITRE + ACH + scenario-tree)</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a> TOWS; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a> STRIDE + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> ACH + scenario-tree</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>L-tier classification (L1 / L2 / L2+ / L3) assigned per document</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a>; 4 cluster analyses at L2+; top-level at L1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Reference-exemplar file set for P1 priority</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td>README, executive-brief, scenario, comparative, methodology-reflection all present</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>International benchmarking for policy-reform P0/P1</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a> 4 policy axes, ≥5 comparators each</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>Red-Team / devil's-advocate critique</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> §Red-Team Box; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td>Bayesian update rules + forward indicators</td><td align="center">✅ PASS</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a> §6 ; <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> forward-indicator table</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Rule-compliance score</strong>: 10 / 10. All reference-exemplar requirements met.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -7810,8 +7810,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-depth-tier-assignment-per-file">2. Depth-Tier Assignment per File<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>File</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>classification-results.md</code></td><td align="center">L1</td><td>Baseline taxonomy; required for all dossiers</td></tr><tr><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>DIW methodology + sensitivity analysis</td></tr><tr><td><code>swot-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>4-cluster SWOT + TOWS interference matrix</td></tr><tr><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>15 risks scored, Bayesian priors, interconnection graph, ALARP</td></tr><tr><td><code>threat-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>6 threats + Attack-Tree + Kill-Chain + Diamond Model + STRIDE</td></tr><tr><td><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>8 groups, 20+ named actors, influence graph</td></tr><tr><td><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></td><td align="center">L1-L2</td><td>Proposition-motion matrix + coordination network</td></tr><tr><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; scenario-specific artifact</td></tr><tr><td><code>comparative-international.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Not L-tier scored; comparative benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>Master synthesis; integrates all pillars</td></tr><tr><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>1-page BLUF</td></tr><tr><td><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td><td align="center">—</td><td>This file</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>4-party cluster; division-of-labour; 15+ dok_id citations</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2+</strong></td><td>3-party triangulation; ECHR comparative</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; climate-fiscal quantification</td></tr><tr><td><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></td><td align="center"><strong>L2</strong></td><td>2-party cluster; NATO post-accession context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle">3. Iteration Log (AI FIRST Principle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-iteration-log-ai-first-principle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 13:10 UTC)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Baseline artifacts (classification, significance, SWOT, risk, threat, stakeholder, cross-ref, synthesis)</li>
 <li>Single-frame analysis on each cluster</li>
@@ -7820,7 +7820,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-pass-1-initial--2026-04-20-1310-utc">Pass 1 (initial — 2026-04-20 1
 <li>Synthesis at ~100 lines; SWOT at ~126 lines; risk at ~109 lines</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 07:16 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>:
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 0
@@ -7834,7 +7834,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -7844,10 +7844,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-baseline"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 
 
 
@@ -7883,7 +7883,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-baseline">Historical Baseline<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dossier</strong></td><td>OPPOSITION-MOTIONS-2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analyst</strong></td><td>news-motions workflow</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Analysis timestamp</strong></td><td>2026-04-20 13:40 UTC</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Purpose</strong></td><td>Put the April 14–17 2026 opposition wave in multi-cycle historical context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Primary sources</strong></td><td>Riksdagen Öppna Data (document index), SVT/DN/SvD archive, Novus/SOM time-series</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Confidence on baseline</strong></td><td>🟩 HIGH (public filing index is complete) · 🟧 MEDIUM on cross-period comparability (changing committee structure)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters"></a></h3>
 <p>Claims that a single opposition wave is "unprecedented" are easy to make and hard to falsify without a baseline. This artifact answers three calibration questions that every other artifact in this dossier depends on:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>How often does four-party opposition coordination happen in the Swedish Riksdag?</strong> (bearing on the <code>[HIGH]</code>-confidence "unprecedented" claim in the LEAD cluster)</li>
@@ -7891,7 +7891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-why-a-historical-baseline-matters">1. Why a Historical Baseline Mat
 <li><strong>Does the 2026 wave show quantitatively different coordination patterns compared to past waves — or is it a regression to a well-known Swedish mean?</strong></li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposition Motion Waves — 2014–2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026"></a></h3>
 <p>The table below lists all identified cases since 2014 where <strong>≥ 3 opposition parties filed ≥ 10 counter-motions against government propositions within a ≤ 14-day window on a common policy cluster</strong>. Inclusion criteria are deliberately strict so that the 2026 event is judged against its real peers, not noise.</p>
 
 
@@ -7998,7 +7998,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-comparable-opposition-motion-waves--20142026">2. Comparable Opposit
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Period</th><th>Cluster theme</th><th>Parties (filing)</th><th align="center">Counter-motions</th><th>Against gov. of</th><th align="center">Election that year?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>2014-03</td><td>Defence / NATO-adjacent procurement (JAS)</td><td>S, MP, V</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Reinfeldt (M-led Alliance)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>2015-11</td><td>Winter migration package (asylum restrictions)</td><td>V, C, L, (later MP split)</td><td align="center">14</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>2017-02</td><td>Welfare-profit limitation (Reepalu)</td><td>M, C, L, KD</td><td align="center">17</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">❌ (election 2018)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>2018-04</td><td>Security / FRA signals intelligence reform</td><td>V, C, L</td><td align="center">10</td><td>Löfven I (S-MP)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2018</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>2020-04</td><td>Pandemic extra-budget and Covid-Act</td><td>M, KD, SD</td><td align="center">12</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>2021-06</td><td>Labour-market law (LAS) reform</td><td>V, M, KD</td><td align="center">13</td><td>Löfven II (S-MP-MRA)</td><td align="center">❌ (early-triggered crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>2022-03</td><td>Gang-crime / organised-crime package</td><td>V, MP, C</td><td align="center">11</td><td>Andersson (S)</td><td align="center">✅ Sept. 2022</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>2023-11</td><td>Energy / nuclear re-regulation</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>2024-10</td><td>Migration — return-centres bill</td><td>S, V, MP, C</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</td><td align="center">❌</td></tr><tr><td align="center">🔶 10</td><td><strong>2026-04</strong></td><td><strong>Reception + Deportation + Housing + Fuel Tax + Arms + Consumer + Healthcare</strong></td><td><strong>S, V, MP, C</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>21</strong></td><td><strong>Kristersson (M-KD-L + SD support)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>✅ Sept. 2026</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the "unprecedented" claim<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim"></a></h4>
 <p>Four findings follow from the table and together supersede any single-period framing:</p>
 
 
@@ -8035,7 +8035,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-calibration-against-the-unprecedented-claim">Calibration against the
 <p><strong>Revised headline</strong>: The April 2026 wave is the <strong>third four-party S+V+MP+C offensive against the Kristersson government</strong> and the <strong>largest single-wave in motion count (21)</strong> in the 2014–2026 observation window. Its coordination pattern is not novel in type; it is unusually broad in scope.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-Rate Table for Election-Year Waves<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves"></a></h3>
 <p>Electoral-cycle analysts often over-weight recent, vivid events. Base rates discipline this. For each comparable election-year wave (rows 1, 4, 7) the table below records the wave's quantitative features and the electoral outcome six months later.</p>
 
 
@@ -8083,7 +8083,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-bayesian-base-rate-table-for-election-year-waves">3. Bayesian Base-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Wave</th><th align="center">Motion count</th><th align="center">Parties</th><th align="center">Gov. polling Δ (−3 mo vs −1 mo to vote)</th><th align="center">Opposition polling Δ</th><th align="center">Government change?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">2014-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">S+MP+V</td><td align="center">−1.8 pp</td><td align="center">+1.4 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2018-04</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">V+C+L</td><td align="center">−0.9 pp</td><td align="center">+0.6 pp</td><td align="center">✅ (via 4-mo crisis)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2022-03</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">V+MP+C</td><td align="center">−1.1 pp</td><td align="center">+1.7 pp</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><strong>2026 median prior</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≈ 10–11</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>≥3</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>−1.3 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+1.2 pp (median)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>3 / 3 = 100 % — but n = 3</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to-posterior update rules for post-April 2026 polling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling"></a></h4>
 <p>The 2026 wave is <strong>larger</strong> (21 motions) than any prior election-year wave. Two reasonable priors follow:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scaling prior</strong>: If motion count is a weak proxy for opposition organisation, and past waves produced ≈ −1.3 pp for the government, the 2026 effect may scale modestly — <strong>expected −1.5 to −2.0 pp</strong> on Tidö bloc aggregate in the Apr–May 2026 Novus / SCB-SOM polls.</li>
@@ -8093,7 +8093,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-to-posterior-update-rules-for-post-april-2026-polling">Prior-to
 <p><strong>Forecast window <code>[MEDIUM]</code></strong>: Polls released May 6–20, 2026 are the primary calibration moment. A government polling loss <strong>&#x3C; 0.8 pp</strong> falsifies the "broad wave = broad effect" prior and supports the diminishing-returns hypothesis. A loss <strong>> 2.0 pp</strong> supports the scaling prior and moves the Election 2026 prior toward government change.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. Coordination-Quality Deltas — 2024 Return-Centres vs. 2026 Wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave"></a></h3>
 <p>Because the 2024 return-centres wave (row 9) is the <strong>most similar</strong> prior event (same four parties, same government, same migration theme, same parliamentary term), it is the strongest comparator. The deltas below isolate what is genuinely new in 2026.</p>
 
 
@@ -8159,8 +8159,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-coordination-quality-deltas--2024-return-centres-vs-2026-wave">4. C
 <p><strong>Key finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The 2026 wave's <strong>genuine novelty is not coordination existence (that already happened in 2024) but coordination breadth across issue clusters and committees</strong> combined with differentiated framing. This is a <em>qualitative</em> upgrade in opposition operational capacity. It is the opposition equivalent of a combined-arms operation rather than a single-front push.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says">5. Long-Run Filing Trends — What the Time Series Says<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-long-run-filing-trends--what-the-time-series-says"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5.1 Total opposition motions filed per riksmöte (2014/15 → 2025/26 YTD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Opposition counter-motions per riksmöte (partial for 2025/26)"
     x-axis ["2014/15","2015/16","2016/17","2017/18","2018/19","2019/20","2020/21","2021/22","2022/23","2023/24","2024/25","2025/26 YTD"]
@@ -8169,7 +8169,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-51-total-opposition-motions-filed-per-riksmöte-201415--202526-ytd">5
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Trend observation <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: Opposition filing volume has risen ~90% from 2014/15 to 2024/25, with the sharpest acceleration from 2022/23 onward (under the current government). The 2025/26 YTD count of 238 (≈ 60% of the riksmöte elapsed) projects to <strong>≈ 397 by end-of-term if the pace holds</strong> — which would be a new record.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day multi-party filings (proxy for coordination)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination"></a></h4>
 <p>Counting the share of opposition motions where <strong>≥ 3 parties file on the same proposition within ≤ 48 hours</strong> of each other:</p>
 
 
@@ -8211,7 +8211,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-52-same-day-multi-party-filings-proxy-for-coordination">5.2 Same-day
 <p><strong>Systemic finding <code>[HIGH]</code></strong>: The April 2026 wave is not an outlier; it is the <strong>visible peak of a two-year rising trend</strong> in opposition coordination. Treating it as a unique event risks missing the structural change. The more interesting analytic question is <strong>what is causing coordination to rise systematically</strong> — candidate explanations: (1) government's reliance on SD for majority reduces centre-right cross-over options for opposition, collapsing them into one bloc; (2) professionalisation of party-level parliamentary strategy offices; (3) SOM-measured voter polarisation increasing the cost of differentiated opposition.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This Baseline Implies for Other Dossier Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -8252,7 +8252,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-what-this-baseline-implies-for-other-dossier-claims">6. What This B
 <p><strong>Methodological note</strong>: This historical-baseline artifact is the <strong>confidence-calibration layer</strong> of the dossier. Its purpose is to prevent single-event over-reading. All downstream claims in <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>, and <code>risk-assessment.md</code> should be stress-tested against the base rates here, not only against qualitative inference.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Coverage</strong>: Riksdagen Öppna Data filing index is complete back to the 2002/03 riksmöte. The 2014–2026 window is chosen because the current five-party bloc structure stabilised post-2014.</li>
 <li><strong>Edge cases</strong>: Rows 2 (2015-11) and 6 (2021-06) involve parties in atypical positions (MP partially opposing own government; V at break point with Löfven II). Treated as opposition-side filings.</li>
@@ -8261,6 +8261,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-data-quality-notes">7. Data-Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public · <strong>Confidence on headline baseline claims</strong>: 🟩 HIGH · <strong>Reviewer</strong>: please flag any inter-period comparability concerns (committee reorganisations, rule changes) for the next revision.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/arms-export-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/deportation-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/fuel-tax-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md"><code>documents/reception-law-cluster-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/motions/historical-baseline.md"><code>historical-baseline.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -8303,7 +8326,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:08.230Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:29.645Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html b/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html
index 3c7c587eb9..0a65057026 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.657Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.066Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.657Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.066Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment","description":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) today cutting fuel taxes and providing electricity/gas price support — directly benefiting ~9M citizens.","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:08.657Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment","description":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) today cutting fuel taxes and providing electricity/gas price support — directly benefiting ~9M citizens.","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:30.066Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,19 +196,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) today cutting fuel taxes and providing electricity/gas price support — directly benefiting ~9M citizens. Simultaneously, the government launched a new wind power revenue-sharing law. Both measures are designed to address household affordability while maintaining a "green transition" narrative ahead of the September 2026 elections.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Elapsed since MCP data pull</strong>: &#x3C; 15 minutes | <strong>Data freshness</strong>: Live (synced 2026-04-21T13:53Z)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial decision</strong>: This is today's lead story — publish EN + SV breaking articles within 2 hours</li>
 <li><strong>Monitoring decision</strong>: Track FiU48 chamber vote outcome (expected 2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24)</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis decision</strong>: Flag FiU48 as potential EU Commission scrutiny target — assign forward monitoring flag</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>FiU48 debate today</strong>: Finance Committee approved extra budget amendment reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support; chamber vote expected within 48 hours</li>
 <li>🌬️ <strong>Wind power law announced</strong>: New legislation requires wind turbine operators to share revenues with residents within 9 turbine-heights — third step of Britz's vindkraftspaket</li>
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-
 <li>⚠️ <strong>Session republication</strong>: Two prior runs (1130, 1240) produced articles on KU + FiU48 but both were lost due to MCP session expiry — this run is the first successful publication</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations">Named Actors with dok_id Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations">Named Actors with dok_id Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations">Named Actors with dok_id Citation
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Significance</th><th>dok_id</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong></td><td>Finance Minister</td><td>Owns FiU48; subject of KU G16 hearing and IP HD10442</td><td>HD01FiU48, HDC220260421ou1, HD10442</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Britz (L)</strong></td><td>Acting Climate/Environment Minister</td><td>Announced vindkraft law; subject of IP HD10440</td><td>gov/vindkraft, HD10440</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Margot Wallström (S)</strong></td><td>Former FM (Löfven govt)</td><td>Subject of KU G34 hearing — foreign policy review</td><td>HDC220260421ou2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</strong></td><td>Justice Minister</td><td>Subject of IP HD10441 on judicial accountability</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Markus Kallifatides (S)</strong></td><td>MP, interpellation filer</td><td>Probing Svantesson on eating disorder care</td><td>HD10442</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johanna Haraldsson (S)</strong></td><td>MP, interpellation filer</td><td>Probing Britz on occupational physician shortage</td><td>HD10440</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elsa Widding (-)</strong></td><td>MP, independent interpellation filer</td><td>Probing Strömmer on judicial self-review</td><td>HD10441</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar">14-Day Forward Vote Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar">14-Day Forward Vote Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar">14-Day Forward Vote Calendar<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date (approx.)</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24</td><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>HIGH — Tidöalliansen majority test</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Interpellation responses: Strömmer, Britz, Svantesson</td><td>MEDIUM — Three simultaneous minister responses</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-05 (est.)</td><td>KU G16/G34 draft report</td><td>HIGH — Constitutional findings on Svantesson + Wallström</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-12 (est.)</td><td>Vindkraft law committee process</td><td>MEDIUM — Implementation timeline confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax cut undermines climate targets</strong> (R01, HIGH probability/HIGH impact)</li>
 <li><strong>FiU48 chamber vote — L dissent possible</strong> (R02, LOW probability/HIGH impact)</li>
@@ -318,22 +318,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 <li><strong>KU Svantesson hearing findings</strong> (R05, LOW probability/HIGH democratic impact)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>LOW ──────────────────── HIGH
                           ████████████ CURRENT: HIGH
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Basis for HIGH confidence</strong>: Live MCP data (synced &#x3C; 1h ago); FiU48 is a published committee report with official Riksdag status; vindkraft announcement is an official government press release; KU hearings are public record.</p>
 <p><strong>Uncertainty factors</strong>: FiU48 exact vote timeline; KU hearing outcomes; EU Commission response timing.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's parliamentary intelligence reveals <strong>two high-significance fiscal and energy policy developments</strong> in Stockholm: the Riksdag Finance Committee's approval of an extra budget amendment (FiU48) reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support, and the government's launch of a new wind power revenue-sharing law giving residents near turbines legal right to compensation. Together these represent Sweden's largest single-day energy and household economics policy event of the 2025/26 Riksdag session.</p>
 <p><strong>Documents analyzed</strong>: 7 primary (date-filtered 2026-04-21) + 4 government press releases (2026-04-20)<br>
 <strong>Analyst confidence</strong>: HIGH<br>
 <strong>Lead-story DIW score</strong>: 9.0/10 (HD01FiU48)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high">Finding 1: Extra Budget FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high">Finding 1: Extra Budget FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48<br>
 <strong>Organ</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)<br>
 <strong>Status</strong>: Committee approved ("Debatt om förslag" 2026-04-21) — chamber vote expected today</p>
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high
 <li><strong>El- och gasprisstöd</strong> — electricity and gas price support scheme — direct support for approximately 3 million Swedish households currently facing elevated energy costs</li>
 </ol>
 <p>The committee debate is scheduled for 2026-04-21. A chamber vote is expected to follow within 1-3 days. The Tidöalliansen (M+SD+KD+L) bloc holds 175/349 seats, providing a narrow majority for passage.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high">Finding 2: Wind Power Revenue-Sharing Law (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high">Finding 2: Wind Power Revenue-Sharing Law (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Regering press release, Johan Britz (acting Climate Minister, L)<br>
 <strong>Status</strong>: Third step of vindkraftspaket — law announced 2026-04-20</p>
 <p>Acting Climate and Environment Minister Johan Britz announced a new law requiring wind power operators to share revenues with residents within up to 9 turbine-heights radius. This is part of a three-step strategy to accelerate Sweden's onshore wind capacity:</p>
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high">Finding 2: Wind Power
 <li>Step 3 (Study): Property buy-out model (inspired by Danish system)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The policy aims to shift local opposition to wind farms (NIMBY) into stakeholder support (YIMBY) — a critical political challenge for Sweden's electricity expansion plans.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance">Finding 3: KU Constitutional Hearings — Svantesson + Wallström (HIGH governance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance">Finding 3: KU Constitutional Hearings — Svantesson + Wallström (HIGH governance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>dok_ids</strong>: HDC220260421ou1, HDC220260421ou2<br>
 <strong>Organ</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)<br>
 <strong>Status</strong>: Open hearings 2026-04-21 (11:00 Svantesson, 12:00 Wallström)</p>
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-gov
 <li><strong>G34</strong>: Former Foreign Minister Margot Wallström (S, Löfven government era) — likely covering foreign policy decisions during previous S government</li>
 </ul>
 <p>These hearings are part of KU's annual constitutional review (granskning) — Sweden's primary mechanism for holding ministers accountable to the Riksdag and constitution.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium">Finding 4: Today's Interpellations (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium">Finding 4: Today's Interpellations (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium"></a></h4>
 <p>Three new interpellations filed 2026-04-21:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD10441</strong>: Elsa Widding → Justice Minister Strömmer on legal system accountability (jurist review of jurists)</li>
@@ -371,12 +371,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium">Finding 4: Today's Interpell
 <li><strong>HD10442</strong>: Markus Kallifatides (S) → Finance Minister Svantesson on eating disorder care in Region Stockholm</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition positioning</strong>: Tidöalliansen pushing two simultaneous "affordability" messages — fuel tax relief AND energy price support — in an apparent bid to pre-empt opposition attacks on high living costs ahead of the 2026 election cycle. The wind power law addition signals the coalition can also address green transition while prioritizing affordability.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition vulnerability</strong>: The S-led opposition faces a dilemma: opposing fuel tax cuts is politically difficult while households face high energy costs; supporting them undermines S's climate credibility. S's interpellation on ätstörningsvård (via Kallifatides → Svantesson) suggests tactical probing of M's fiscal oversight of regional healthcare.</p>
 <p><strong>Election-year significance</strong>: With 2026 elections approaching, FiU48 + vindkraft package represents the coalition's "relief + green" narrative — a politically calculated dual signal.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-event-coverage-status">Event Coverage Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-event-coverage-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-event-coverage-status">Event Coverage Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-event-coverage-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -420,9 +420,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-event-coverage-status">Event Coverage Status<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>Previous run</th><th>This run</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>Covered (1130,1240) BUT LOST</td><td>✅ Re-covered</td></tr><tr><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>Vindkraft intäktsdelning</td><td>Not covered</td><td>✅ New coverage</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou1</td><td>KU-utfrågning Svantesson</td><td>Covered (1240) BUT LOST</td><td>✅ Re-covered</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou2</td><td>KU-utfrågning Wallström</td><td>Covered (1240) BUT LOST</td><td>✅ Re-covered</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441/40/42</td><td>Interpellationer (3 new)</td><td>Not covered</td><td>✅ New coverage</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el- och gasprisstöd<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el- och gasprisstöd<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 9.0 / 10</strong> <em>(Lead Story)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el-
 <strong>Citizen impact</strong>: Approx. 5–15% fuel tax reduction for ~6M drivers; electricity/gas support for ~3M households
 <strong>Implementation</strong>: Law changes expected effective 2026-mid</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende">Vindkraft Intäktsdelning — Ny lag om ersättning till närboende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende">Vindkraft Intäktsdelning — Ny lag om ersättning till närboende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 8.0 / 10</strong> <em>(Second Lead)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende">Vin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>New legislation (lag om intäktsdelning)</td><td>+2</td><td>New law giving residents up to 9 turbine heights compensation rights</td></tr><tr><td>Energy/climate strategic significance</td><td>+2</td><td>Part of Sweden's fossil-free electricity buildout — critical for 2030 targets</td></tr><tr><td>Named minister (Johan Britz)</td><td>+1</td><td>Acting Climate/Environment Minister announces policy</td></tr><tr><td>Multi-tier policy package</td><td>+1</td><td>Third step in vindkraftspaket: communes, residents, property buy-out study</td></tr><tr><td>International comparison (Denmark model)</td><td>+1</td><td>Property buy-out model mirroring Danish precedent</td></tr><tr><td>Local governance impact</td><td>+1</td><td>Direct incentive for commune approval of wind farms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH → SECOND LEAD</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet">KU-utfrågning: Svantesson + Wallström — Konstitutionsutskottet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet">KU-utfrågning: Svantesson + Wallström — Konstitutionsutskottet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 7.5 / 10</strong> <em>(Third Lead)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet">KU-utf
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional committee oversight</td><td>+2</td><td>KU — highest constitutional accountability mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Senior ministers/officials</td><td>+2</td><td>Finance Minister Svantesson (live) + former FM Wallström (opposition era)</td></tr><tr><td>Governance/democratic function</td><td>+2</td><td>Public open hearings (öppna utfrågningar) — KU G16 + G34</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party scrutiny</td><td>+1</td><td>Multi-party committee examining government accountability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>7.5</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH (governance significance)</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm">HD10442 — Interpellation: Ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm (Markus Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm">HD10442 — Interpellation: Ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm (Markus Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 5.5 / 10</strong> <em>(MEDIUM)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-marku
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Finance Minister answer required</td><td>+1</td><td>Svantesson must respond — cross-accountability</td></tr><tr><td>S → M opposition dynamic</td><td>+1</td><td>Kallifatides challenging Moderate regional health policy</td></tr><tr><td>Health/social welfare</td><td>+1</td><td>Eating disorders care — vulnerable population</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm-specific (not national)</td><td>-1</td><td>Regional issue, limits national DIW impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>5.5</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl">HD10440 — Interpellation: Företagsläkare (Johanna Haraldsson/S → Johan Britz/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl">HD10440 — Interpellation: Företagsläkare (Johanna Haraldsson/S → Johan Britz/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 4.5 / 10</strong> <em>(MEDIUM)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -640,13 +640,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-b
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Labor market health policy</td><td>+1</td><td>Occupational physician shortage — systemic problem</td></tr><tr><td>L minister answer</td><td>+1</td><td>Cross-party accountability (S → L coalition partner)</td></tr><tr><td>Long-standing structural issue</td><td>+1</td><td>Arbetslivsinstitutet abolished 2007, no adequate replacement</td></tr><tr><td>Limited immediate policy impact</td><td>-1</td><td>No vote or legislation pending</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>4.5</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm">HD10441 — Interpellation: Rättssäkerheten (Elsa Widding → Gunnar Strömmer/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm">HD10441 — Interpellation: Rättssäkerheten (Elsa Widding → Gunnar Strömmer/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 4.0 / 10</strong> <em>(MEDIUM)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande">HD01TU16 — Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning (TU betänkande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande">HD01TU16 — Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning (TU betänkande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 3.0 / 10</strong> <em>(LOW — skip)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-designation">Lead-Story Designation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-designation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-designation">Lead-Story Designation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-designation"></a></h3>
 <p>🏆 <strong>Primary Lead</strong>: HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All article titles, H1 headings, and meta descriptions MUST reference FiU48 and its consumer impact</li>
@@ -654,15 +654,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-lead-story-designation">Lead-Story Designation<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p>🥈 <strong>Secondary</strong>: Vindkraft intäktsdelning — New revenue-sharing law for wind turbine neighbors</p>
 <p>🥉 <strong>Tertiary</strong>: KU Constitutional Committee open hearings (Svantesson + Wallström)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups">HD01FiU48 Extra Budget + Vindkraft Law — 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents">1. Citizens (10M Swedish residents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups">HD01FiU48 Extra Budget + Vindkraft Law — 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents">1. Citizens (10M Swedish residents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — Direct financial relief from fuel tax cut + energy price support<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: Near-universal short-term benefit; division between urban (public transport) and rural (car-dependent) communities<br>
 <strong>Winners</strong>: ~6M vehicle owners get immediate fuel cost reduction; ~3M households benefit from el- och gasprisstöd<br>
 <strong>Losers</strong>: Climate-conscious citizens concerned about fossil incentives; urban residents who don't own cars get less benefit<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Sweden's fuel costs among Europe's highest (tax component ~50%); energy support addresses post-2022 elevated prices</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — This is their flagship 2026 relief package<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: Coalition frames FiU48 as essential affordability measure; vindkraft law as green credentials<br>
 <strong>Winners</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson (M) owns the fiscal narrative; Acting Climate Minister Johan Britz (L) leads vindkraft<br>
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a
 <strong>Strategy</strong>: "Affordability + transition" messaging — presenting both measures as complementary rather than contradictory<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: FiU48 approval by FiU committee; Britz's three-step vindkraftspaket announcement<br>
 <strong>dok_ids</strong>: HD01FiU48, gov/vindkraft</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues">3. Opposition Bloc (primarily S, but also V, MP, C on specific issues)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues">3. Opposition Bloc (primarily S, but also V, MP, C on specific issues)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — Forced into difficult political position<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: S faces contradictory pressures: oppose fuel tax cuts (climate) or support them (affordability)?<br>
 <strong>S leadership dilemma</strong>:</p>
@@ -683,32 +683,32 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues">3.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Interpellation pattern (Kallifatides on healthcare, Haraldsson on occupational physicians) suggests S prefers tactical probing on social issues rather than direct FiU48 confrontation<br>
 <strong>dok_ids</strong>: HD10442, HD10440</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH — Fuel cost relief for logistics, agriculture, fishing<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: Welcomed by transport sector (last-mile logistics, trucking), agriculture (diesel for farm equipment), fishing<br>
 <strong>Winners</strong>: Logistics companies (DHL Sverige, Postnord, etc.), farming cooperatives (LRF), fishing industry<br>
 <strong>Potential losers</strong>: Electric vehicle manufacturers and charging operators (reduced price incentive for EV switch)<br>
 <strong>Wind power industry</strong>: New revenue-sharing law adds compliance cost but increases social license → net positive for project approvals<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Swedish Transport Agency data shows commercial transport comprises ~35% of fuel consumption; farm diesel tax relief recurring demand from LRF</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations">5. Civil Society (environmental NGOs, social welfare organizations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations">5. Civil Society (environmental NGOs, social welfare organizations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (split)<br>
 <strong>Environmental NGOs</strong> (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF Sverige, Greenpeace): STRONGLY NEGATIVE on fuel tax cut — conflicts with Sweden's climate commitments<br>
 <strong>Social welfare organizations</strong> (Rädda Barnen, Riksförbundet Frivilliga Samhällsarbetare): POSITIVE on energy price support — helps vulnerable households avoid energy poverty<br>
 <strong>Vindkraft opposition groups</strong> (local NIMBY organizations): CAUTIOUSLY POSITIVE on revenue sharing — may reduce opposition but may be insufficient<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Naturskyddsföreningen has previously criticized any fossil fuel subsidy; energy poverty affected approximately 180,000 Swedish households in 2023 (Energimyndigheten data)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM<br>
 <strong>EU Commission</strong>: Will scrutinize fuel tax reduction under Green Deal; Sweden has one of EU's stronger climate reputations → any backsliding noted<br>
 <strong>Nordic neighbors</strong>: DK already has wind power property buy-out model that Sweden is studying — confirms regional policy convergence<br>
 <strong>Ukraine/Baltic dimension</strong>: Sweden's energy security and renewable buildout has NATO/Baltic Sea defense implications — vindkraft expansion aligns with energy independence goals<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: EU State Aid rules require notification for energy support schemes; Nordic comparisons relevant (DK property inlösen model)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary / Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary / Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM<br>
 <strong>Constitutional dimension</strong>: KU hearings today (Svantesson + Wallström) test procedural compliance and ministerial accountability<br>
 <strong>Legal system</strong>: HD10441 interpellation on judicial accountability (Widding → Strömmer) points to structural concern about jurist self-review in civil courts<br>
 <strong>Wind power law</strong>: New intäktsdelning law will inevitably face interpretation disputes in courts about compensation calculation methodology<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: KU hearings 2026-04-21; HD10441; government's new vindkraft law</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media / Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media / Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — both stories are media-friendly (consumer relief + green technology)<br>
 <strong>Framing contests</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -720,9 +720,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media / Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hi
 <strong>Media attention expected</strong>: SR Ekot, SVT Agenda, DN, SvD will cover FiU48 debate day</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon">Base Scenarios (30-day and 90-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case">Scenario A: "Fuel Tax Relief + Green Transition Succeed" (BASE CASE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon">Base Scenarios (30-day and 90-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case">Scenario A: "Fuel Tax Relief + Green Transition Succeed" (BASE CASE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 50% (30-day) | 40% (90-day)</p>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: FiU48 passes Riksdag chamber with M+SD+KD+L bloc intact (175 votes). Fuel tax reduction takes effect, providing measurable household relief. Vindkraft revenue-sharing law passes committee process smoothly. EU Commission issues monitoring note but no formal objection. Coalition's combined "affordability + green" narrative gains political traction.</p>
 <p><strong>30-day indicators</strong>:</p>
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case">Scena
 <li>KU G16 report: no formal criticism of Svantesson</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Policy impact (if achieved)</strong>: ~SEK 3-4B fiscal cost of fuel tax cut; ~SEK 5-8B for energy support; potentially +500-800 MW new wind power capacity approved within 12 months</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely">Scenario B: "Partial Success — FiU48 Passes but Complications Emerge" (LIKELY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely">Scenario B: "Partial Success — FiU48 Passes but Complications Emerge" (LIKELY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 35% (30-day) | 45% (90-day)</p>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: FiU48 passes but with internal L party tension. EU Commission formally queries Sweden under fossil subsidy monitoring framework. Wind power law faces initial legal challenge from developer association. KU G16 hearing results in formal committee observation (not full criticism) of Svantesson's fiscal process documentation.</p>
 <p><strong>30-day indicators</strong>:</p>
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-lik
 <li>KU observation on Svantesson's fiscal documentation — below formal criticism threshold</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political impact</strong>: Coalition appears competent but under pressure; opposition S claims "we said so" on climate tensions</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish">Scenario C: "Coalition Stress — FiU48 Amended or Climate Crisis" (BEARISH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish">Scenario C: "Coalition Stress — FiU48 Amended or Climate Crisis" (BEARISH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 15% (30-day) | 15% (90-day)</p>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: L party unexpectedly votes against or demands significant amendments to FiU48's fuel tax component. EU Commission opens formal State Aid investigation. A major climate event (extreme weather, IPCC report) shifts public opinion sharply against fossil fuel subsidies. Coalition's affordability narrative collapses.</p>
 <p><strong>Trigger events</strong>:</p>
@@ -765,13 +765,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political impact</strong>: Major coalition stress; Svantesson faces political isolation if L distances itself; opposition S gains 3-5 points in polls</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wildcards">Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcards"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10">Wildcard 1: Energy Price Collapse Before Vote (PROBABILITY: 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcards">Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcards"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10">Wildcard 1: Energy Price Collapse Before Vote (PROBABILITY: 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10"></a></h4>
 <p>If European energy prices drop sharply before the FiU48 chamber vote, the political urgency for el- och gasprisstöd evaporates. The bill could appear opportunistic or unnecessary, giving opposition S the "we said so" moment. Impact: MEDIUM-HIGH.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5">Wildcard 2: Major Wind Power Accident or Turbine Fire (PROBABILITY: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5">Wildcard 2: Major Wind Power Accident or Turbine Fire (PROBABILITY: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5"></a></h4>
 <p>A high-profile wind turbine fire or structural failure, particularly in Sweden or adjacent Nordic country, could shift public opinion against vindkraft revenue sharing and potentially delay the entire package. Denmark experienced turbine fires in 2023-2024 that briefly slowed new approvals. Impact: MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis A</strong>: FiU48 is primarily an affordability measure with electoral intent<br>
 <strong>Hypothesis B</strong>: FiU48 is primarily a fiscal stabilization measure responding to genuine economic stress<br>
 <strong>Hypothesis C</strong>: FiU48 is primarily a climate policy compromise — the price of L staying in coalition</p>
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Hyp A (Electoral)</th><th>Hyp B (Fiscal)</th><th>Hyp C (Climate compromise)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Announcement timed near 2026 elections</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>INCONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td></tr><tr><td>Energy prices still elevated vs 2021</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td></tr><tr><td>L's historical green tax opposition</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td></tr><tr><td>No sunset clause in FiU48</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>INCONSISTENT</td></tr><tr><td>Simultaneous vindkraft green package</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td></tr><tr><td>Three-step vindkraftspaket coherence</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Hypotheses A and C are most consistent with available evidence. FiU48 is simultaneously an electoral move AND a coalition management tool to keep L on board with a green counter-balance.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -863,8 +863,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Scenario Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>Scenario A (passes cleanly) or B (amended) or C (fails)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Interpellation answers session</td><td>B/C if Svantesson criticized on healthcare</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-01</td><td>EU Commission quarterly fossil subsidy review</td><td>B (inquiry) or C (investigation)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-15</td><td>KU G16 preliminary findings</td><td>A (clean) or B (observation)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-01</td><td>First vindkraft revenue-sharing implementation cases</td><td>A (smooth) or B (legal challenge)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -943,30 +943,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01</td><td>Fuel tax cut accelerates fossil dependency, missing 2030 transport decarbonization targets</td><td>HIGH (0.7)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>8.5</td><td>Parallel EV charging infrastructure investment; time-limit tax cut to 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R02</td><td>Extra budget FiU48 rejected or amended in chamber vote → coalition embarrassment</td><td>LOW (0.15)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>7.0</td><td>M+SD+KD+L bloc has 175+ seats; rejection unlikely but possible if L dissents</td></tr><tr><td>R03</td><td>EU Commission objects to Swedish fuel tax reduction under Green Deal</td><td>MEDIUM (0.4)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>6.0</td><td>Sweden can argue affordability exemption; precedent from Germany 2022 Tankrabatt</td></tr><tr><td>R04</td><td>Wind power revenue-sharing law triggers property rights litigation</td><td>MEDIUM (0.35)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5.5</td><td>Legal challenge from developers or landowners challenging compensation formula</td></tr><tr><td>R05</td><td>KU Svantesson hearing reveals budget process irregularities</td><td>LOW (0.2)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>6.5</td><td>Committee hearings are constitutional review — potential for governance findings</td></tr><tr><td>R06</td><td>El- och gasprisstöd administrative burden overwhelms Skatteverket</td><td>MEDIUM (0.3)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5.0</td><td>Previous energy support programs (2021-2022) created backlogs</td></tr><tr><td>R07</td><td>Interpellation on ätstörningsvård (HD10442) escalates to formal VU</td><td>LOW (0.1)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>5.5</td><td>Opposition pattern: interpellation → motion → potential VU if no response</td></tr><tr><td>R08</td><td>Wallström KU hearing triggers fresh S-opposition narrative on foreign policy</td><td>MEDIUM (0.3)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>4.5</td><td>Historical review of pre-2022 FP decisions — S leadership may seek to manage narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring">Top-5 Risks for Immediate Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical">R01 — Fossil Lock-in from Fuel Tax Cut <em>(CRITICAL)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring">Top-5 Risks for Immediate Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical">R01 — Fossil Lock-in from Fuel Tax Cut <em>(CRITICAL)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 70% of measurable impact within 12 months<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Sweden's transport emissions fell 19% 2020-2024 partly due to high fuel prices; tax cut reverses price signal<br>
 <strong>Affected parties</strong>: S, MP, C (all have climate commitments); EU Commission<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: Any indication that 2026 transport emission statistics diverge from projections</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact">R02 — Chamber Vote on FiU48 Fails <em>(LOW but HIGH IMPACT)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact">R02 — Chamber Vote on FiU48 Fails <em>(LOW but HIGH IMPACT)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 15%<br>
 <strong>Scenario</strong>: If Liberals (L) — historically pro-green tax — vote against, coalition loses majority (175 − 16 L seats = 159, below 175 threshold)<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: L party statements before chamber vote; any L dissenters emerging</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium">R03 — EU Green Deal Conflict <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium">R03 — EU Green Deal Conflict <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 40%<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: European Commission monitoring member-state fossil subsidies; Sweden could face State Aid review<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: EU Regulation 2024/1679 requires member states to report fossil fuel subsidies<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: EC press releases; Swedish EU mission statements</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact">R05 — KU Hearing Governance Findings <em>(LOW probability, HIGH democratic impact)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact">R05 — KU Hearing Governance Findings <em>(LOW probability, HIGH democratic impact)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 20%<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: KU G16 examines Svantesson on fiscal framework processes; KU G34 examines Wallström on foreign policy decisions during S government<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: KU draft report language; any dissenting KU committee member statements</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium">R04 — Wind Power Law Legal Challenge <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium">R04 — Wind Power Law Legal Challenge <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 35%<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Developers may argue compensation calculation method violates property law; residents may argue amount too low<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: Legal professional organizations' statements; first court filings post-implementation</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs">Risk Trend (Compared to Previous Realtime Runs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs">Risk Trend (Compared to Previous Realtime Runs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1010,8 +1010,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs">Risk Trend (Compared t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk Area</th><th>Previous (1130/1240)</th><th>Current (1353)</th><th>Trend</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal accountability</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (FiU48 debate day)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>Energy policy</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (two major items)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional oversight</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM (hearings complete?)</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition stability</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>Climate targets</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (fuel tax cut)</td><td>↑</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-context-table">Context Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-table"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-context-table">Context Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-context-table">Context Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Analysis Date</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>Run</td><td>realtime-1353</td></tr><tr><td>Lead Doc</td><td>HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Secondary</td><td>Vindkraft intäktsdelning (new law)</td></tr><tr><td>Analyst Confidence</td><td>HIGH (live MCP data, committee report available)</td></tr><tr><td>Political Context</td><td>Tidöalliansen (M+SD+KD+L) governing coalition, 2022-2026 mandate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy">SWOT Analysis — Extra Budget FiU48 + Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy">SWOT Analysis — Extra Budget FiU48 + Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT: Extra Budget FiU48 + Vindkraft Incentives (2026-04-21)
     x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy">SWOT Analysis — E
     Green transition tension: [0.72, 0.75]
     Opposition critique exposure: [0.78, 0.65]
     Fossil fuel lock-in risk: [0.80, 0.72]</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Immediate consumer relief from fuel tax cut</td><td>FiU48 reduces fuel tax burden for ~6M vehicle owners; energy support helps ~3M households</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power revenue sharing builds local acceptance</td><td>Up to 9 turbine-heights radius compensation creates incentive for communes to approve farms</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Three-pillar vindkraftspaket coherence</td><td>Commune subsidies (budget 2025) → resident compensation (new law) → property buy-out study</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FiU approval signals coalition discipline</td><td>Finance Committee (FiU) approving extra budget shows M+SD+KD+L bloc cohesion</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party fiscal pragmatism</td><td>Extra budget outside main annual budget cycle demonstrates crisis-response capability</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut undermines climate commitments</td><td>Sweden's 2030 fossil-free transport target conflicts with reducing fuel tax incentive</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Temporary energy support complexity</td><td>El- och gasprisstöd creates complex administration for Försäkringskassan/Skatteverket</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft compensation may be insufficient</td><td>Residents closest to turbines may still oppose; law-mandated minimum may not match market</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Extra budget process signals fiscal improvisation</td><td>Multiple extra changes budgets in one year suggests reactive rather than strategic fiscal planning</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Accelerate Sweden's fossil-free electricity buildout</td><td>If wind power expansion succeeds → Sweden can export renewable energy surplus → economic gain</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Energy price support → political dividend for coalition</td><td>Direct household relief 2026 → potential electoral credit before 2026 elections</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Property buy-out model from Denmark → innovation</td><td>Investigating Danish property inlösen model → potential Swedish innovation in land rights</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Reframing wind power from NIMBY to YIMBY</td><td>Revenue-sharing turns opponents into stakeholders → paradigm shift in local acceptance</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU hearings strengthen democratic accountability</td><td>Svantesson + Wallström hearings reinforce institutional norms of ministerial accountability</td><td>KU hearings</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1229,19 +1229,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut locks in fossil dependency</td><td>Each SEK/liter reduction reduces price signal for EV adoption; risks missing 2030 targets</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition may face EU criticism</td><td>EU Green Deal compliance tension if Sweden reduces fossil fuel taxes</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft compensation law challenged in court</td><td>Property rights vs. developer rights may trigger legal challenges from landowners</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition S may counter with alternative energy support</td><td>S-led opposition could propose more targeted support → political embarrassment</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU scrutiny may surface governance failures</td><td>Wallström (S) investigation could reveal policy failures damaging coalition's credibility</td><td>KU hearings</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics">Cross-Cutting SWOT Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics">Cross-Cutting SWOT Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Strength–Threat Tension</strong>: The fuel tax cut provides genuine short-term consumer relief (S) but threatens long-term climate targets (T). This tension defines the political debate: coalition argues affordability NOW vs. opposition argues sustainability LATER.</p>
 <p><strong>Opportunity–Weakness Interaction</strong>: Wind power revenue sharing (O) directly addresses local opposition (W) but may be legally challenged (T). The Danish model study (O) signals openness to bolder reforms.</p>
 <p><strong>Scenario Dependency</strong>: If energy prices remain elevated through 2026, el- och gasprisstöd becomes politically essential and FiU48 looks prescient. If energy prices drop, the extra budget looks wasteful.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-level-assessment">Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-assessment"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-assessment">Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH<br>
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (parliamentary session data, no classified sources)<br>
 <strong>Primary Threat Domain</strong>: Democratic Accountability + Climate Policy Integrity</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-active-threats">Active Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high">T01 — Climate Policy Integrity Threat (SEVERITY: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-active-threats">Active Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high">T01 — Climate Policy Integrity Threat (SEVERITY: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Policy coherence threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: Riksdag coalition (M+SD+KD+L), EU Commission<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: The extra budget amendment FiU48 reducing fuel taxes creates a direct structural conflict with Sweden's 2030 climate targets (54% emissions reduction vs. 1990 levels, transport sector currently at -37%). Reduced fuel taxes decrease the economic incentive for EV adoption and carpooling, potentially adding 500,000-1,000,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent annually if sustained beyond 2026.</p>
@@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high">T01 — Climate P
 <li>EU monitoring of member-state fossil fuel subsidies under Regulation 2024/1679</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Democratic dimension</strong>: Citizens who voted for parties with climate commitments (S, C, MP, V) may perceive this as a broken promise; trust in climate governance at risk.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium">T02 — Constitutional Oversight Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium">T02 — Constitutional Oversight Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Governance threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: KU Committee, Finance Minister Svantesson, former FM Wallström<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: The dual KU hearings on 2026-04-21 represent active constitutional scrutiny of both the current government (Svantesson/fiscal processes) and the previous S government (Wallström/foreign policy). If KU hearings reveal ministerial accountability failures, they could trigger formal KU findings that damage reputations and set constitutional precedents.</p>
@@ -1262,16 +1262,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium">T02 — Constit
 <li>Dual hearings same day = coordinated KU scrutiny</li>
 <li>HDA7KU42 (KU granskning meeting) same day suggests active investigation phase</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low">T03 — Social Cohesion Threat from Eating Disorder Care Failures (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low">T03 — Social Cohesion Threat from Eating Disorder Care Failures (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Social welfare governance threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: Region Stockholm, Finance Minister Svantesson, S opposition<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: HD10442 interpellation (Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M) on eating disorder care in Region Stockholm suggests systemic underfunding of mental health services. If Svantesson's response is inadequate, opposition can escalate to formal motion for increased healthcare funding — potential wedge issue on social welfare vs. fiscal conservatism.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low">T04 — Occupational Health Capacity Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low">T04 — Occupational Health Capacity Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Labor market governance threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: Labor Minister Johan Britz (L), S opposition<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: HD10440 interpellation on företagsläkare (occupational physicians) highlights structural gap since Arbetslivsinstitutet abolished 2007. Sweden has approximately 500 active occupational physicians vs. estimated need of 1,500-2,000 — a 60-70% gap. This threatens workplace health monitoring, particularly in sectors with high injury/illness rates.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1309,15 +1309,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger Event</th><th>Threat</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote — any dissenting M/SD/KD/L votes</td><td>T02 (coalition stability)</td><td>1-3 days</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission climate progress report</td><td>T01 (fuel tax)</td><td>30-60 days</td></tr><tr><td>KU draft report on G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>T02 (constitutional)</td><td>30-90 days</td></tr><tr><td>S formal motion on ätstörningsvård</td><td>T03 (social welfare)</td><td>7-21 days</td></tr><tr><td>Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet response to ip HD10440</td><td>T04 (labor health)</td><td>21 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-level-medium-high">Threat Level: MEDIUM-HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-medium-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-medium-high">Threat Level: MEDIUM-HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-medium-high"></a></h3>
 <p>The combination of a significant fiscal policy move (FiU48) that tests coalition climate credibility, simultaneous constitutional hearings on both the current and previous governments, and multiple S opposition interpellations on social welfare issues creates a MEDIUM-HIGH aggregate threat environment to Swedish democratic governance quality for the period 2026-04-21 to 2026-05-21.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context">Overview: Sweden's Fuel Tax Cut + Wind Power Package in Nordic/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context">Overview: Sweden's Fuel Tax Cut + Wind Power Package in Nordic/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price support) and vindkraft revenue-sharing law against 5+ comparable jurisdictions to assess where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, or <strong>diverges</strong> from international best practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-baseline-comparison">Nordic Baseline Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-comparison"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-baseline-comparison">Nordic Baseline Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (FiU48/vindkraft)</th><th>Denmark</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax strategy</td><td>REDUCING (extra budget 2026)</td><td>STABLE (maintaining carbon price)</td><td><strong>Sweden DIVERGES</strong> — DK maintains fuel price signal</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power local compensation</td><td>Revenue-sharing (up to 9 turbine heights)</td><td>Revenue-sharing + property buy-out rights</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS DK</strong> — copying DK model</td></tr><tr><td>Household energy support</td><td>Direct price support (el-/gasprisstöd)</td><td>Green check payments 2022-2023</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> (delayed vs. DK 2022)</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48, gov/vindkraft 2026-04-20</td><td>Danish Energy Agency 2024 report</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key divergence</strong>: Denmark abandoned fossil fuel tax reductions after 2022 energy crisis; Sweden is reintroducing them in 2026. Denmark chose carbon-price stability as a principle; Sweden prioritized short-term affordability. This reflects a fundamental policy philosophy difference.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy">Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy">Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy">Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel P
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Norway</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax policy</td><td>Reducing (FiU48)</td><td>Stable, oil-revenue funds separate</td><td><strong>Sweden DIVERGES</strong> — Norway's oil fund provides fiscal buffer without tax cuts</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support mechanism</td><td>Direct price support</td><td>Electricity subsidy scheme 2022-2024</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> (similar mechanism, different timing)</td></tr><tr><td>Onshore wind opposition</td><td>High NIMBY resistance → revenue sharing law</td><td>High NIMBY resistance → revenue sharing law</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> — Norway's natural damage compensation model predates Sweden's</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48, gov/vindkraft</td><td>Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition">Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Transition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition">Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Transition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1430,8 +1430,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition">Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Trans
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Finland</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Nuclear + wind balance</td><td>Heavy wind buildout; nuclear moratorium ending</td><td>Both nuclear (Olkiluoto 3) and wind</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> — Finland's diversified approach is more energy-secure</td></tr><tr><td>Local compensation for wind</td><td>New revenue-sharing law 2026</td><td>Kuntakorvaus (municipal compensation) since 2019</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> (7 years behind Finland)</td></tr><tr><td>Household energy support</td><td>FiU48 electricity support</td><td>State electricity subsidy 2022-2023</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48; Finnish Energy Authority</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-eu-benchmark-comparison">EU Benchmark Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-benchmark-comparison"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison">Sweden vs. Germany (Energiewende Comparison)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-benchmark-comparison">EU Benchmark Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-benchmark-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison">Sweden vs. Germany (Energiewende Comparison)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison">Sweden vs. Germany (Energi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Germany</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax policy 2026</td><td>Reducing</td><td>STABLE (post-Tankrabatt controversy)</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS controversial path</strong> — Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt (€0.30/L rebate) was widely criticized as regressive and ineffective</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power expansion</td><td>3-step incentive package</td><td>Bürgerbeteiligung (citizen participation) model</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> — German model since 2023 requires 0.2 ct/kWh payout to local residents (similar to Swedish law)</td></tr><tr><td>Energy price support targeting</td><td>Broad (all households)</td><td>Targeted (low-income households, Wohngeld)</td><td><strong>Sweden DIVERGES</strong> — Sweden's approach is less targeted, less effective for most vulnerable</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48; German Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1500,22 +1500,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Netherlands</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax stance</td><td>Reducing</td><td>Reduced then restored (2022-2025)</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS Dutch model</strong> — NL reduced fuel tax 2022, restored 2024; Sweden appears to follow similar path</td></tr><tr><td>Wind local opposition</td><td>Revenue sharing</td><td>SDE+ (Stimulering Duurzame Energieproductie) includes local benefits</td><td><strong>Sweden CONVERGES</strong> with Dutch community benefit approach</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48; Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation">Areas of Swedish Innovation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture">Innovation 1: Three-Step Vindkraftspaket Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation">Areas of Swedish Innovation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture">Innovation 1: Three-Step Vindkraftspaket Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's coordinated three-step approach (commune subsidies → resident compensation → property buy-out study) is <strong>more systematic</strong> than any single Nordic/EU country's wind acceptance policy. While Denmark has individual elements, Sweden's unified legislative package from one government is structurally innovative.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: gov/vindkraft announcement 2026-04-20; Johan Britz three-step description</p>
-<h3 id="rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget">Innovation 2: Combining Fiscal Relief + Green Policy in Single Extra Budget<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget">Innovation 2: Combining Fiscal Relief + Green Policy in Single Extra Budget<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget"></a></h4>
 <p>The FiU48 design—cutting fuel taxes while simultaneously providing energy support AND launching a wind power law—creates a "green-fiscal hybrid" that avoids pure fossil subsidy framing. No exact EU parallel found.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01FiU48; gov/vindkraft</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models">Areas Where Sweden Follows International Models<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models">Areas Where Sweden Follows International Models<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Wind power local compensation</strong>: Sweden explicitly studies Danish property buy-out model (confirmed by Britz statement)</li>
 <li><strong>Energy price support</strong>: Follows 2022-2023 Nordic/EU precedents (Denmark, Norway, Finland all implemented similar schemes earlier)</li>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax reduction</strong>: Follows Germany's controversial 2022 Tankrabatt — with documented ineffectiveness risks</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags">Areas Where Sweden Diverges (Risk Flags)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags">Areas Where Sweden Diverges (Risk Flags)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags">Areas Where Sweden Diverges (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Divergence</th><th>Jurisdictions where Sweden differs</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax reduction while peers maintain</td><td>DK, NO, FI, DE (post-Tankrabatt)</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — Sweden isolated in reverse fossil policy direction</td></tr><tr><td>Broad vs. targeted energy support</td><td>vs. Germany, UK, NL (means-tested)</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Regressive distribution risk</td></tr><tr><td>No sunset clause on fuel tax cut</td><td>vs. most EU peers who time-limited cuts</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — Risk of permanent fossil subsidy lock-in</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>World Bank: Energy data Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland</li>
 <li>EU Commission: State Aid monitoring, fossil subsidy reporting</li>
@@ -1553,11 +1553,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>Finnish Energy Authority (Energiavirasto)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-security-classification-public">Security Classification: PUBLIC<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-classification-public"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-security-classification-public">Security Classification: PUBLIC<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-classification-public"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents analyzed are publicly available via Riksdag and Government APIs.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact">Document Classification by CIA Triad Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact">Document Classification by CIA Triad Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact">Document Classification
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbrev.)</th><th>Confidentiality</th><th>Integrity</th><th>Availability</th><th>RTO</th><th>RPO</th><th>Overall</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra budget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (fiscal law)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou1</td><td>KU Svantesson hearing</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (constitutional)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou2</td><td>KU Wallström hearing</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (constitutional)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>Vindkraft intäktsdelning law</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (new legislation)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441/40/42</td><td>Interpellationer</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>MEDIUM (procedural)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Weekly</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1661,13 +1661,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">Policy Domain Classification<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Documents</th><th>ISMS Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal Policy</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Government budget integrity</td></tr><tr><td>Energy Policy</td><td>HD01FiU48, gov/vindkraft</td><td>Critical infrastructure (energy sector)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional Oversight</td><td>KU hearings</td><td>Democratic governance integrity</td></tr><tr><td>Labor/Health</td><td>HD10440, HD10441</td><td>Social welfare governance</td></tr><tr><td>Social Welfare</td><td>HD10442</td><td>Healthcare accountability</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-gdpr--privacy-notes">GDPR / Privacy Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gdpr--privacy-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-gdpr--privacy-notes">GDPR / Privacy Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gdpr--privacy-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>No personal data beyond publicly elected officials' names</li>
 <li>KU hearing transcripts are public records</li>
 <li>No special category personal data processed</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-information-lifecycle">Information Lifecycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-lifecycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-lifecycle">Information Lifecycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-lifecycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1702,11 +1702,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-lifecycle">Information Lifecycle<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Collection</td><td>MCP API query (public sources)</td></tr><tr><td>Processing</td><td>AI analysis by automated agent</td></tr><tr><td>Storage</td><td>Git repository (public)</td></tr><tr><td>Publication</td><td>GitHub Pages (public)</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Indefinite (public record)</td></tr><tr><td>Deletion</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context">Tidöalliansen Mandate Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context">Tidöalliansen Mandate Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context"></a></h3>
 <p>The Tidöalliansen government (M+SD+KD+L) has governed since October 2022. The 2026 parliamentary election is expected in September 2026, making spring 2026 a critical pre-election period. Both FiU48 and the vindkraft law carry significant electoral framing implications — this classification note is relevant for interpreting the political intent behind simultaneous policy announcements.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-network">Document Relationship Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-network"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-network">Document Relationship Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     FiU48["HD01FiU48\nExtra Budget 2026\nFuel Tax + Energy Support"] 
     VK["gov/vindkraft\nVindkraft Intäktsdelning\nNew Revenue-Sharing Law"]
@@ -1729,29 +1729,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-network">Document Relationship Network<a class=
     style IP42 fill:#888888,color:#fff
     style IP40 fill:#888888,color:#fff
     style IP41 fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead">Cluster A — Affordability + Energy (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead">Cluster A — Affordability + Energy (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01FiU48</strong> ← LEAD: Extra budget, fuel tax, energy support</li>
 <li><strong>gov/vindkraft</strong> ← SECOND: Wind power revenue sharing law</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-link</strong>: Both involve Energy/Climate portfolio; both are "relief + green" framing</li>
 <li><strong>Minister responsible</strong>: Svantesson (fiscal), Britz (energy/climate)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability">Cluster B — Constitutional Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability">Cluster B — Constitutional Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HDC220260421ou1</strong> ← KU hearing: Svantesson (current M government)</li>
 <li><strong>HDC220260421ou2</strong> ← KU hearing: Wallström (previous S government)</li>
 <li><strong>HDA7KU42</strong> ← KU granskning meeting (same day)</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-link</strong>: KU's annual constitutional review examining both coalition and opposition eras</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations">Cluster C — Social Policy Probing (Opposition Interpellations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations">Cluster C — Social Policy Probing (Opposition Interpellations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD10442</strong> ← Ätstörningsvård → Finance Minister (M healthcare accountability)</li>
 <li><strong>HD10440</strong> ← Företagsläkare → Labor Minister (occupational health gaps)</li>
 <li><strong>HD10441</strong> ← Rättssäkerhet → Justice Minister (court accountability)</li>
 <li><strong>Pattern</strong>: S-party interpellations targeting three different ministers = coordinated opposition pressure campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-run-references">Cross-Run References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-run-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-run-references">Cross-Run References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-run-references"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-run-references">Cross-Run References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior Run</th><th>Key Findings</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>realtime-1130</td><td>KU hearings + FiU48 initial coverage</td><td>LOST (session expired)</td></tr><tr><td>realtime-1240</td><td>KU hearings + FiU48 deep analysis</td><td>LOST (session expired)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>realtime-1353</strong></td><td><strong>REPUBLICATION + vindkraft new addition</strong></td><td><strong>THIS RUN</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1821,8 +1821,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Forward Event</th><th>Expected Date</th><th>Linked Docs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>KU G16 draft report</td><td>2026-05 to 2026-06</td><td>HDC220260421ou1</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law implementation</td><td>2026-mid</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td></tr><tr><td>IP response: Strömmer on rättssäkerhet</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td>IP response: Britz on företagsläkare</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HD10440</td></tr><tr><td>IP response: Svantesson on ätstörningsvård</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HD10442</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1896,9 +1896,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology</th><th>Applied?</th><th>Files Produced</th><th>Quality Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>synthesis-summary, executive-brief</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>per-file-political-intelligence.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>HD01FiU48 doc analysis in synthesis</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>political-swot-framework.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>PASS — 4 quadrants, evidence tables, Mermaid</td></tr><tr><td>political-risk-methodology.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>PASS — 8 risks, probability/impact</td></tr><tr><td>political-threat-framework.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>PASS — confidence labels, actors</td></tr><tr><td>political-classification-guide.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>classification-results.md</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>political-style-guide.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>All narrative sections</td><td>PASS — specific actors, no generic phrases</td></tr><tr><td>DIW (Democratic Impact Weighting)</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>PASS — HD01FiU48 = 9.0/10 lead</td></tr><tr><td>9-Artifact Completeness Gate</td><td>✅ PASS (9/9)</td><td>All required</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>14-Artifact Reference-Grade Gate</td><td>✅ PASS (14/14)</td><td>All Tier-C</td><td>PASS</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h3>
 <p><em>(Every forward indicator from last 2 days of sibling realtime-monitor runs, explicitly carried forward or retired with reason)</em></p>
-<h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory">From realtime-1130 (2026-04-21 ~11:30) — LOST run, reconstructed from memory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory">From realtime-1130 (2026-04-21 ~11:30) — LOST run, reconstructed from memory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memor
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Status</th><th>Disposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 committee debate outcome</td><td>Carried forward — committee approved</td><td><strong>RESOLVED: FiU48 approved, debate today</strong></td></tr><tr><td>KU hearing G16 Svantesson</td><td>Carried forward</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Hearing completed 11:00, findings pending</strong></td></tr><tr><td>KU hearing G34 Wallström</td><td>Carried forward</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Hearing completed 12:00, findings pending</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction">From realtime-1240 (2026-04-21 ~12:40) — LOST run, memory reconstruction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction">From realtime-1240 (2026-04-21 ~12:40) — LOST run, memory reconstruction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction">F
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Status</th><th>Disposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote timing</td><td>Forward indicator: 24-48h from committee approval</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Vote expected 2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24</strong></td></tr><tr><td>KU hearings → draft report</td><td>Forward indicator: 30-60 days</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Forwarded to this run's scenario analysis</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law — first legislative steps</td><td>Not identified in 1240 run</td><td><strong>NEW: Announced 2026-04-20, not covered in 1240</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Interpellation responses x3</td><td>Forward indicator</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Expected 2026-04-28</strong></td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission fuel subsidy monitoring</td><td>Forward indicator</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Tracked in R03, scenario-analysis</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-all-watchpoints-summary">All Watchpoints Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-watchpoints-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-all-watchpoints-summary">All Watchpoints Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-watchpoints-summary"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>4 RESOLVED or progressed</strong>: FiU48 committee → approved</li>
 <li><strong>6 ACTIVE</strong>: Chamber vote, KU findings, vindkraft implementation, 3 interpellation responses, EU monitoring</li>
@@ -1970,13 +1970,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-all-watchpoints-summary">All Watchpoints Summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 13:55 UTC
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: realtime-1353
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: riksdag-regering-mcp (32 tools), get_sync_status, search_dokument, get_betankanden, get_interpellationer, get_propositioner, search_regering
 <strong>MCP Status</strong>: live (2026-04-21T13:53:57Z)
 <strong>Documents Analyzed</strong>: 7 primary + 4 government press releases</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21">Primary Documents (date-filtered 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21">Primary Documents (date-filtered 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21">Primary Documents (date-f
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Title</th><th>Organ</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>bet</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>FiU</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou1</td><td>sam-ou</td><td>KU-utfrågning med finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>KU</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou2</td><td>sam-ou</td><td>KU-utfrågning med tidigare utrikesminister Margot Wallström (S)</td><td>KU</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>ip</td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>-</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>ip</td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>-</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>ip</td><td>Uttalanden om ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm</td><td>-</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>bet</td><td>Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning</td><td>TU</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20">Government Press Releases (2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20">Government Press Releases (2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2071,15 +2071,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20">Government Press Releases (2026
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Title</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>regeringen-okar-incitamenten-for-ny-vindkraft</td><td>Regeringen ökar incitamenten för ny vindkraft (intäktsdelning)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>starkta-insatser-for-samhallsplacerade-barn...</td><td>Stärkta insatser för samhällsplacerade barn (SiS)</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>154-miljoner-kronor-i-stod-till-demokrati-...</td><td>15,4 miljoner kronor i stöd till Ukraina</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>riksrevisionens-rapport-om-tandvardsstodet</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om Tandvårdsstödet</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-previous-run-status">Previous Run Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-run-status">Previous Run Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-status"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Run realtime-1240 (run_id: 24722758908): <strong>FAILED_SESSION_EXPIRED</strong> — articles lost, no published PR</li>
 <li>Run realtime-1130: Status unknown, likely covered HD01FiU48 but PR may have failed</li>
 <li><strong>Conclusion</strong>: All today's content requires republication</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary Lead</strong>: HD01FiU48 — Riksdag Finance Committee approves extra budget amendment reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support (FiU48 debate scheduled 2026-04-21)</p>
 <p><strong>Secondary</strong>: Wind power revenue-sharing law — new compensation for residents near turbines (new proposition by Acting Climate Minister Johan Britz)</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -2116,7 +2133,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:08.657Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:30.066Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html b/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html
index df03a31163..471903caff 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.752Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.171Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.752Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.171Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-21T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment","description":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) today cutting fuel taxes and providing electricity/gas price support — directly benefiting ~9M citizens.","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:08.752Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment","description":"Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) today cutting fuel taxes and providing electricity/gas price support — directly benefiting ~9M citizens.","datePublished":"2026-04-21T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:30.171Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-21-realtime-1353-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -196,19 +196,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front">BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Riksdag Finance Committee approved an extra budget amendment (FiU48) today cutting fuel taxes and providing electricity/gas price support — directly benefiting ~9M citizens. Simultaneously, the government launched a new wind power revenue-sharing law. Both measures are designed to address household affordability while maintaining a "green transition" narrative ahead of the September 2026 elections.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH | <strong>Elapsed since MCP data pull</strong>: &#x3C; 15 minutes | <strong>Data freshness</strong>: Live (synced 2026-04-21T13:53Z)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial decision</strong>: This is today's lead story — publish EN + SV breaking articles within 2 hours</li>
 <li><strong>Monitoring decision</strong>: Track FiU48 chamber vote outcome (expected 2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24)</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis decision</strong>: Flag FiU48 as potential EU Commission scrutiny target — assign forward monitoring flag</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-8-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>FiU48 debate today</strong>: Finance Committee approved extra budget amendment reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support; chamber vote expected within 48 hours</li>
 <li>🌬️ <strong>Wind power law announced</strong>: New legislation requires wind turbine operators to share revenues with residents within 9 turbine-heights — third step of Britz's vindkraftspaket</li>
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-8-bullets">60-Second Read (8 Bullets)<a class="" aria-
 <li>⚠️ <strong>Session republication</strong>: Two prior runs (1130, 1240) produced articles on KU + FiU48 but both were lost due to MCP session expiry — this run is the first successful publication</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations">Named Actors with dok_id Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations">Named Actors with dok_id Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-named-actors-with-dok_id-citations">Named Actors with dok_id Citation
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Significance</th><th>dok_id</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong></td><td>Finance Minister</td><td>Owns FiU48; subject of KU G16 hearing and IP HD10442</td><td>HD01FiU48, HDC220260421ou1, HD10442</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johan Britz (L)</strong></td><td>Acting Climate/Environment Minister</td><td>Announced vindkraft law; subject of IP HD10440</td><td>gov/vindkraft, HD10440</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Margot Wallström (S)</strong></td><td>Former FM (Löfven govt)</td><td>Subject of KU G34 hearing — foreign policy review</td><td>HDC220260421ou2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</strong></td><td>Justice Minister</td><td>Subject of IP HD10441 on judicial accountability</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Markus Kallifatides (S)</strong></td><td>MP, interpellation filer</td><td>Probing Svantesson on eating disorder care</td><td>HD10442</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Johanna Haraldsson (S)</strong></td><td>MP, interpellation filer</td><td>Probing Britz on occupational physician shortage</td><td>HD10440</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Elsa Widding (-)</strong></td><td>MP, independent interpellation filer</td><td>Probing Strömmer on judicial self-review</td><td>HD10441</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar">14-Day Forward Vote Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar">14-Day Forward Vote Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-14-day-forward-vote-calendar">14-Day Forward Vote Calendar<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date (approx.)</th><th>Event</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24</td><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>HIGH — Tidöalliansen majority test</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Interpellation responses: Strömmer, Britz, Svantesson</td><td>MEDIUM — Three simultaneous minister responses</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-05 (est.)</td><td>KU G16/G34 draft report</td><td>HIGH — Constitutional findings on Svantesson + Wallström</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-12 (est.)</td><td>Vindkraft law committee process</td><td>MEDIUM — Implementation timeline confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax cut undermines climate targets</strong> (R01, HIGH probability/HIGH impact)</li>
 <li><strong>FiU48 chamber vote — L dissent possible</strong> (R02, LOW probability/HIGH impact)</li>
@@ -318,22 +318,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-5-risks">Top-5 Risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 <li><strong>KU Svantesson hearing findings</strong> (R05, LOW probability/HIGH democratic impact)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analyst-confidence-meter">Analyst Confidence Meter<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analyst-confidence-meter"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>LOW ──────────────────── HIGH
                           ████████████ CURRENT: HIGH
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Basis for HIGH confidence</strong>: Live MCP data (synced &#x3C; 1h ago); FiU48 is a published committee report with official Riksdag status; vindkraft announcement is an official government press release; KU hearings are public record.</p>
 <p><strong>Uncertainty factors</strong>: FiU48 exact vote timeline; KU hearing outcomes; EU Commission response timing.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-executive-summary">Executive Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's parliamentary intelligence reveals <strong>two high-significance fiscal and energy policy developments</strong> in Stockholm: the Riksdag Finance Committee's approval of an extra budget amendment (FiU48) reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support, and the government's launch of a new wind power revenue-sharing law giving residents near turbines legal right to compensation. Together these represent Sweden's largest single-day energy and household economics policy event of the 2025/26 Riksdag session.</p>
 <p><strong>Documents analyzed</strong>: 7 primary (date-filtered 2026-04-21) + 4 government press releases (2026-04-20)<br>
 <strong>Analyst confidence</strong>: HIGH<br>
 <strong>Lead-story DIW score</strong>: 9.0/10 (HD01FiU48)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high">Finding 1: Extra Budget FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings">Key Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high">Finding 1: Extra Budget FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48<br>
 <strong>Organ</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)<br>
 <strong>Status</strong>: Committee approved ("Debatt om förslag" 2026-04-21) — chamber vote expected today</p>
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-1-extra-budget-fiu48--fuel-tax-cut--energy-price-support-high
 <li><strong>El- och gasprisstöd</strong> — electricity and gas price support scheme — direct support for approximately 3 million Swedish households currently facing elevated energy costs</li>
 </ol>
 <p>The committee debate is scheduled for 2026-04-21. A chamber vote is expected to follow within 1-3 days. The Tidöalliansen (M+SD+KD+L) bloc holds 175/349 seats, providing a narrow majority for passage.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high">Finding 2: Wind Power Revenue-Sharing Law (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high">Finding 2: Wind Power Revenue-Sharing Law (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Regering press release, Johan Britz (acting Climate Minister, L)<br>
 <strong>Status</strong>: Third step of vindkraftspaket — law announced 2026-04-20</p>
 <p>Acting Climate and Environment Minister Johan Britz announced a new law requiring wind power operators to share revenues with residents within up to 9 turbine-heights radius. This is part of a three-step strategy to accelerate Sweden's onshore wind capacity:</p>
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-2-wind-power-revenue-sharing-law-high">Finding 2: Wind Power
 <li>Step 3 (Study): Property buy-out model (inspired by Danish system)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The policy aims to shift local opposition to wind farms (NIMBY) into stakeholder support (YIMBY) — a critical political challenge for Sweden's electricity expansion plans.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance">Finding 3: KU Constitutional Hearings — Svantesson + Wallström (HIGH governance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance">Finding 3: KU Constitutional Hearings — Svantesson + Wallström (HIGH governance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-governance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>dok_ids</strong>: HDC220260421ou1, HDC220260421ou2<br>
 <strong>Organ</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)<br>
 <strong>Status</strong>: Open hearings 2026-04-21 (11:00 Svantesson, 12:00 Wallström)</p>
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-3-ku-constitutional-hearings--svantesson--wallström-high-gov
 <li><strong>G34</strong>: Former Foreign Minister Margot Wallström (S, Löfven government era) — likely covering foreign policy decisions during previous S government</li>
 </ul>
 <p>These hearings are part of KU's annual constitutional review (granskning) — Sweden's primary mechanism for holding ministers accountable to the Riksdag and constitution.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium">Finding 4: Today's Interpellations (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium">Finding 4: Today's Interpellations (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium"></a></h4>
 <p>Three new interpellations filed 2026-04-21:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD10441</strong>: Elsa Widding → Justice Minister Strömmer on legal system accountability (jurist review of jurists)</li>
@@ -371,12 +371,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-finding-4-todays-interpellations-medium">Finding 4: Today's Interpell
 <li><strong>HD10442</strong>: Markus Kallifatides (S) → Finance Minister Svantesson on eating disorder care in Region Stockholm</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-intelligence-assessment">Political Intelligence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-intelligence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition positioning</strong>: Tidöalliansen pushing two simultaneous "affordability" messages — fuel tax relief AND energy price support — in an apparent bid to pre-empt opposition attacks on high living costs ahead of the 2026 election cycle. The wind power law addition signals the coalition can also address green transition while prioritizing affordability.</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition vulnerability</strong>: The S-led opposition faces a dilemma: opposing fuel tax cuts is politically difficult while households face high energy costs; supporting them undermines S's climate credibility. S's interpellation on ätstörningsvård (via Kallifatides → Svantesson) suggests tactical probing of M's fiscal oversight of regional healthcare.</p>
 <p><strong>Election-year significance</strong>: With 2026 elections approaching, FiU48 + vindkraft package represents the coalition's "relief + green" narrative — a politically calculated dual signal.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-event-coverage-status">Event Coverage Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-event-coverage-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-event-coverage-status">Event Coverage Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-event-coverage-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -420,9 +420,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-event-coverage-status">Event Coverage Status<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>Previous run</th><th>This run</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>Covered (1130,1240) BUT LOST</td><td>✅ Re-covered</td></tr><tr><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>Vindkraft intäktsdelning</td><td>Not covered</td><td>✅ New coverage</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou1</td><td>KU-utfrågning Svantesson</td><td>Covered (1240) BUT LOST</td><td>✅ Re-covered</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou2</td><td>KU-utfrågning Wallström</td><td>Covered (1240) BUT LOST</td><td>✅ Re-covered</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441/40/42</td><td>Interpellationer (3 new)</td><td>Not covered</td><td>✅ New coverage</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el- och gasprisstöd<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd">HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026: Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el- och gasprisstöd<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el--och-gasprisstöd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 9.0 / 10</strong> <em>(Lead Story)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-2026-sänkt-skatt-på-drivmedel--el-
 <strong>Citizen impact</strong>: Approx. 5–15% fuel tax reduction for ~6M drivers; electricity/gas support for ~3M households
 <strong>Implementation</strong>: Law changes expected effective 2026-mid</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende">Vindkraft Intäktsdelning — Ny lag om ersättning till närboende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende">Vindkraft Intäktsdelning — Ny lag om ersättning till närboende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 8.0 / 10</strong> <em>(Second Lead)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-vindkraft-intäktsdelning--ny-lag-om-ersättning-till-närboende">Vin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>New legislation (lag om intäktsdelning)</td><td>+2</td><td>New law giving residents up to 9 turbine heights compensation rights</td></tr><tr><td>Energy/climate strategic significance</td><td>+2</td><td>Part of Sweden's fossil-free electricity buildout — critical for 2030 targets</td></tr><tr><td>Named minister (Johan Britz)</td><td>+1</td><td>Acting Climate/Environment Minister announces policy</td></tr><tr><td>Multi-tier policy package</td><td>+1</td><td>Third step in vindkraftspaket: communes, residents, property buy-out study</td></tr><tr><td>International comparison (Denmark model)</td><td>+1</td><td>Property buy-out model mirroring Danish precedent</td></tr><tr><td>Local governance impact</td><td>+1</td><td>Direct incentive for commune approval of wind farms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH → SECOND LEAD</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet">KU-utfrågning: Svantesson + Wallström — Konstitutionsutskottet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet">KU-utfrågning: Svantesson + Wallström — Konstitutionsutskottet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 7.5 / 10</strong> <em>(Third Lead)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ku-utfrågning-svantesson--wallström--konstitutionsutskottet">KU-utf
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional committee oversight</td><td>+2</td><td>KU — highest constitutional accountability mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Senior ministers/officials</td><td>+2</td><td>Finance Minister Svantesson (live) + former FM Wallström (opposition era)</td></tr><tr><td>Governance/democratic function</td><td>+2</td><td>Public open hearings (öppna utfrågningar) — KU G16 + G34</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party scrutiny</td><td>+1</td><td>Multi-party committee examining government accountability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>7.5</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH (governance significance)</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm">HD10442 — Interpellation: Ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm (Markus Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm">HD10442 — Interpellation: Ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm (Markus Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-markus-kallifatidess--svantessonm"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 5.5 / 10</strong> <em>(MEDIUM)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10442--interpellation-ätstörningsvården-i-region-stockholm-marku
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Finance Minister answer required</td><td>+1</td><td>Svantesson must respond — cross-accountability</td></tr><tr><td>S → M opposition dynamic</td><td>+1</td><td>Kallifatides challenging Moderate regional health policy</td></tr><tr><td>Health/social welfare</td><td>+1</td><td>Eating disorders care — vulnerable population</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm-specific (not national)</td><td>-1</td><td>Regional issue, limits national DIW impact</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>5.5</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl">HD10440 — Interpellation: Företagsläkare (Johanna Haraldsson/S → Johan Britz/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl">HD10440 — Interpellation: Företagsläkare (Johanna Haraldsson/S → Johan Britz/L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-britzl"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 4.5 / 10</strong> <em>(MEDIUM)</em></p>
 
 
@@ -640,13 +640,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10440--interpellation-företagsläkare-johanna-haraldssons--johan-b
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Points</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Labor market health policy</td><td>+1</td><td>Occupational physician shortage — systemic problem</td></tr><tr><td>L minister answer</td><td>+1</td><td>Cross-party accountability (S → L coalition partner)</td></tr><tr><td>Long-standing structural issue</td><td>+1</td><td>Arbetslivsinstitutet abolished 2007, no adequate replacement</td></tr><tr><td>Limited immediate policy impact</td><td>-1</td><td>No vote or legislation pending</td></tr><tr><td><strong>TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>4.5</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm">HD10441 — Interpellation: Rättssäkerheten (Elsa Widding → Gunnar Strömmer/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm">HD10441 — Interpellation: Rättssäkerheten (Elsa Widding → Gunnar Strömmer/M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10441--interpellation-rättssäkerheten-elsa-widding--gunnar-strömmerm"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 4.0 / 10</strong> <em>(MEDIUM)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande">HD01TU16 — Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning (TU betänkande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande">HD01TU16 — Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning (TU betänkande)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16--slopat-krav-på-introduktionsutbildning-tu-betänkande"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>DIW Score: 3.0 / 10</strong> <em>(LOW — skip)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-designation">Lead-Story Designation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-designation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-designation">Lead-Story Designation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-designation"></a></h3>
 <p>🏆 <strong>Primary Lead</strong>: HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 — Fuel Tax Cut + Energy Price Support</p>
 <ul>
 <li>All article titles, H1 headings, and meta descriptions MUST reference FiU48 and its consumer impact</li>
@@ -654,15 +654,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-lead-story-designation">Lead-Story Designation<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p>🥈 <strong>Secondary</strong>: Vindkraft intäktsdelning — New revenue-sharing law for wind turbine neighbors</p>
 <p>🥉 <strong>Tertiary</strong>: KU Constitutional Committee open hearings (Svantesson + Wallström)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups">HD01FiU48 Extra Budget + Vindkraft Law — 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents">1. Citizens (10M Swedish residents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups">HD01FiU48 Extra Budget + Vindkraft Law — 8 Stakeholder Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-extra-budget--vindkraft-law--8-stakeholder-groups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents">1. Citizens (10M Swedish residents)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-citizens-10m-swedish-residents"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — Direct financial relief from fuel tax cut + energy price support<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: Near-universal short-term benefit; division between urban (public transport) and rural (car-dependent) communities<br>
 <strong>Winners</strong>: ~6M vehicle owners get immediate fuel cost reduction; ~3M households benefit from el- och gasprisstöd<br>
 <strong>Losers</strong>: Climate-conscious citizens concerned about fossil incentives; urban residents who don't own cars get less benefit<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Sweden's fuel costs among Europe's highest (tax component ~50%); energy support addresses post-2022 elevated prices</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — This is their flagship 2026 relief package<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: Coalition frames FiU48 as essential affordability measure; vindkraft law as green credentials<br>
 <strong>Winners</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson (M) owns the fiscal narrative; Acting Climate Minister Johan Britz (L) leads vindkraft<br>
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-government-coalition-msdkdl">2. Government Coalition (M+SD+KD+L)<a
 <strong>Strategy</strong>: "Affordability + transition" messaging — presenting both measures as complementary rather than contradictory<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: FiU48 approval by FiU committee; Britz's three-step vindkraftspaket announcement<br>
 <strong>dok_ids</strong>: HD01FiU48, gov/vindkraft</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues">3. Opposition Bloc (primarily S, but also V, MP, C on specific issues)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues">3. Opposition Bloc (primarily S, but also V, MP, C on specific issues)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — Forced into difficult political position<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: S faces contradictory pressures: oppose fuel tax cuts (climate) or support them (affordability)?<br>
 <strong>S leadership dilemma</strong>:</p>
@@ -683,32 +683,32 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-opposition-bloc-primarily-s-but-also-v-mp-c-on-specific-issues">3.
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Interpellation pattern (Kallifatides on healthcare, Haraldsson on occupational physicians) suggests S prefers tactical probing on social issues rather than direct FiU48 confrontation<br>
 <strong>dok_ids</strong>: HD10442, HD10440</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-business--industry">4. Business &#x26; Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-business--industry"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH — Fuel cost relief for logistics, agriculture, fishing<br>
 <strong>Perspective</strong>: Welcomed by transport sector (last-mile logistics, trucking), agriculture (diesel for farm equipment), fishing<br>
 <strong>Winners</strong>: Logistics companies (DHL Sverige, Postnord, etc.), farming cooperatives (LRF), fishing industry<br>
 <strong>Potential losers</strong>: Electric vehicle manufacturers and charging operators (reduced price incentive for EV switch)<br>
 <strong>Wind power industry</strong>: New revenue-sharing law adds compliance cost but increases social license → net positive for project approvals<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Swedish Transport Agency data shows commercial transport comprises ~35% of fuel consumption; farm diesel tax relief recurring demand from LRF</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations">5. Civil Society (environmental NGOs, social welfare organizations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations">5. Civil Society (environmental NGOs, social welfare organizations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-civil-society-environmental-ngos-social-welfare-organizations"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH (split)<br>
 <strong>Environmental NGOs</strong> (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF Sverige, Greenpeace): STRONGLY NEGATIVE on fuel tax cut — conflicts with Sweden's climate commitments<br>
 <strong>Social welfare organizations</strong> (Rädda Barnen, Riksförbundet Frivilliga Samhällsarbetare): POSITIVE on energy price support — helps vulnerable households avoid energy poverty<br>
 <strong>Vindkraft opposition groups</strong> (local NIMBY organizations): CAUTIOUSLY POSITIVE on revenue sharing — may reduce opposition but may be insufficient<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Naturskyddsföreningen has previously criticized any fossil fuel subsidy; energy poverty affected approximately 180,000 Swedish households in 2023 (Energimyndigheten data)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-international--eu">6. International / EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-international--eu"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM<br>
 <strong>EU Commission</strong>: Will scrutinize fuel tax reduction under Green Deal; Sweden has one of EU's stronger climate reputations → any backsliding noted<br>
 <strong>Nordic neighbors</strong>: DK already has wind power property buy-out model that Sweden is studying — confirms regional policy convergence<br>
 <strong>Ukraine/Baltic dimension</strong>: Sweden's energy security and renewable buildout has NATO/Baltic Sea defense implications — vindkraft expansion aligns with energy independence goals<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: EU State Aid rules require notification for energy support schemes; Nordic comparisons relevant (DK property inlösen model)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary / Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-7-judiciary--constitutional">7. Judiciary / Constitutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-judiciary--constitutional"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: MEDIUM<br>
 <strong>Constitutional dimension</strong>: KU hearings today (Svantesson + Wallström) test procedural compliance and ministerial accountability<br>
 <strong>Legal system</strong>: HD10441 interpellation on judicial accountability (Widding → Strömmer) points to structural concern about jurist self-review in civil courts<br>
 <strong>Wind power law</strong>: New intäktsdelning law will inevitably face interpretation disputes in courts about compensation calculation methodology<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: KU hearings 2026-04-21; HD10441; government's new vindkraft law</p>
-<h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media / Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media / Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-media--public-opinion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Impact</strong>: HIGH — both stories are media-friendly (consumer relief + green technology)<br>
 <strong>Framing contests</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -720,9 +720,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-8-media--public-opinion">8. Media / Public Opinion<a class="" aria-hi
 <strong>Media attention expected</strong>: SR Ekot, SVT Agenda, DN, SvD will cover FiU48 debate day</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon">Base Scenarios (30-day and 90-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case">Scenario A: "Fuel Tax Relief + Green Transition Succeed" (BASE CASE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon">Base Scenarios (30-day and 90-day horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenarios-30-day-and-90-day-horizon"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case">Scenario A: "Fuel Tax Relief + Green Transition Succeed" (BASE CASE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 50% (30-day) | 40% (90-day)</p>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: FiU48 passes Riksdag chamber with M+SD+KD+L bloc intact (175 votes). Fuel tax reduction takes effect, providing measurable household relief. Vindkraft revenue-sharing law passes committee process smoothly. EU Commission issues monitoring note but no formal objection. Coalition's combined "affordability + green" narrative gains political traction.</p>
 <p><strong>30-day indicators</strong>:</p>
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a-fuel-tax-relief--green-transition-succeed-base-case">Scena
 <li>KU G16 report: no formal criticism of Svantesson</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Policy impact (if achieved)</strong>: ~SEK 3-4B fiscal cost of fuel tax cut; ~SEK 5-8B for energy support; potentially +500-800 MW new wind power capacity approved within 12 months</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely">Scenario B: "Partial Success — FiU48 Passes but Complications Emerge" (LIKELY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely">Scenario B: "Partial Success — FiU48 Passes but Complications Emerge" (LIKELY)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-likely"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 35% (30-day) | 45% (90-day)</p>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: FiU48 passes but with internal L party tension. EU Commission formally queries Sweden under fossil subsidy monitoring framework. Wind power law faces initial legal challenge from developer association. KU G16 hearing results in formal committee observation (not full criticism) of Svantesson's fiscal process documentation.</p>
 <p><strong>30-day indicators</strong>:</p>
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b-partial-success--fiu48-passes-but-complications-emerge-lik
 <li>KU observation on Svantesson's fiscal documentation — below formal criticism threshold</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political impact</strong>: Coalition appears competent but under pressure; opposition S claims "we said so" on climate tensions</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish">Scenario C: "Coalition Stress — FiU48 Amended or Climate Crisis" (BEARISH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish">Scenario C: "Coalition Stress — FiU48 Amended or Climate Crisis" (BEARISH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 15% (30-day) | 15% (90-day)</p>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: L party unexpectedly votes against or demands significant amendments to FiU48's fuel tax component. EU Commission opens formal State Aid investigation. A major climate event (extreme weather, IPCC report) shifts public opinion sharply against fossil fuel subsidies. Coalition's affordability narrative collapses.</p>
 <p><strong>Trigger events</strong>:</p>
@@ -765,13 +765,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-c-coalition-stress--fiu48-amended-or-climate-crisis-bearish"
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Political impact</strong>: Major coalition stress; Svantesson faces political isolation if L distances itself; opposition S gains 3-5 points in polls</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-wildcards">Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcards"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10">Wildcard 1: Energy Price Collapse Before Vote (PROBABILITY: 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-wildcards">Wildcards<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcards"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10">Wildcard 1: Energy Price Collapse Before Vote (PROBABILITY: 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-1-energy-price-collapse-before-vote-probability-10"></a></h4>
 <p>If European energy prices drop sharply before the FiU48 chamber vote, the political urgency for el- och gasprisstöd evaporates. The bill could appear opportunistic or unnecessary, giving opposition S the "we said so" moment. Impact: MEDIUM-HIGH.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5">Wildcard 2: Major Wind Power Accident or Turbine Fire (PROBABILITY: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5">Wildcard 2: Major Wind Power Accident or Turbine Fire (PROBABILITY: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wildcard-2-major-wind-power-accident-or-turbine-fire-probability-5"></a></h4>
 <p>A high-profile wind turbine fire or structural failure, particularly in Sweden or adjacent Nordic country, could shift public opinion against vindkraft revenue sharing and potentially delay the entire package. Denmark experienced turbine fires in 2023-2024 that briefly slowed new approvals. Impact: MEDIUM.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) Grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis A</strong>: FiU48 is primarily an affordability measure with electoral intent<br>
 <strong>Hypothesis B</strong>: FiU48 is primarily a fiscal stabilization measure responding to genuine economic stress<br>
 <strong>Hypothesis C</strong>: FiU48 is primarily a climate policy compromise — the price of L staying in coalition</p>
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-analysis-of-competing-hypotheses-grid">ACH (Analysis of Competing
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Hyp A (Electoral)</th><th>Hyp B (Fiscal)</th><th>Hyp C (Climate compromise)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Announcement timed near 2026 elections</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>INCONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td></tr><tr><td>Energy prices still elevated vs 2021</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td></tr><tr><td>L's historical green tax opposition</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td></tr><tr><td>No sunset clause in FiU48</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>INCONSISTENT</td></tr><tr><td>Simultaneous vindkraft green package</td><td>CONSISTENT</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td></tr><tr><td>Three-step vindkraftspaket coherence</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>CONSISTENT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Hypotheses A and C are most consistent with available evidence. FiU48 is simultaneously an electoral move AND a coalition management tool to keep L on board with a green counter-balance.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -863,8 +863,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-trigger-calendar">Monitoring-Trigger Calendar<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Scenario Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>Scenario A (passes cleanly) or B (amended) or C (fails)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Interpellation answers session</td><td>B/C if Svantesson criticized on healthcare</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-01</td><td>EU Commission quarterly fossil subsidy review</td><td>B (inquiry) or C (investigation)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-15</td><td>KU G16 preliminary findings</td><td>A (clean) or B (observation)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-01</td><td>First vindkraft revenue-sharing implementation cases</td><td>A (smooth) or B (legal challenge)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -943,30 +943,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-matrix">Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Probability</th><th>Impact</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01</td><td>Fuel tax cut accelerates fossil dependency, missing 2030 transport decarbonization targets</td><td>HIGH (0.7)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>8.5</td><td>Parallel EV charging infrastructure investment; time-limit tax cut to 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R02</td><td>Extra budget FiU48 rejected or amended in chamber vote → coalition embarrassment</td><td>LOW (0.15)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>7.0</td><td>M+SD+KD+L bloc has 175+ seats; rejection unlikely but possible if L dissents</td></tr><tr><td>R03</td><td>EU Commission objects to Swedish fuel tax reduction under Green Deal</td><td>MEDIUM (0.4)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>6.0</td><td>Sweden can argue affordability exemption; precedent from Germany 2022 Tankrabatt</td></tr><tr><td>R04</td><td>Wind power revenue-sharing law triggers property rights litigation</td><td>MEDIUM (0.35)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5.5</td><td>Legal challenge from developers or landowners challenging compensation formula</td></tr><tr><td>R05</td><td>KU Svantesson hearing reveals budget process irregularities</td><td>LOW (0.2)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>6.5</td><td>Committee hearings are constitutional review — potential for governance findings</td></tr><tr><td>R06</td><td>El- och gasprisstöd administrative burden overwhelms Skatteverket</td><td>MEDIUM (0.3)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>5.0</td><td>Previous energy support programs (2021-2022) created backlogs</td></tr><tr><td>R07</td><td>Interpellation on ätstörningsvård (HD10442) escalates to formal VU</td><td>LOW (0.1)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>5.5</td><td>Opposition pattern: interpellation → motion → potential VU if no response</td></tr><tr><td>R08</td><td>Wallström KU hearing triggers fresh S-opposition narrative on foreign policy</td><td>MEDIUM (0.3)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>4.5</td><td>Historical review of pre-2022 FP decisions — S leadership may seek to manage narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring">Top-5 Risks for Immediate Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical">R01 — Fossil Lock-in from Fuel Tax Cut <em>(CRITICAL)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring">Top-5 Risks for Immediate Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risks-for-immediate-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical">R01 — Fossil Lock-in from Fuel Tax Cut <em>(CRITICAL)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r01--fossil-lock-in-from-fuel-tax-cut-critical"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 70% of measurable impact within 12 months<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: Sweden's transport emissions fell 19% 2020-2024 partly due to high fuel prices; tax cut reverses price signal<br>
 <strong>Affected parties</strong>: S, MP, C (all have climate commitments); EU Commission<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: Any indication that 2026 transport emission statistics diverge from projections</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact">R02 — Chamber Vote on FiU48 Fails <em>(LOW but HIGH IMPACT)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact">R02 — Chamber Vote on FiU48 Fails <em>(LOW but HIGH IMPACT)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r02--chamber-vote-on-fiu48-fails-low-but-high-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 15%<br>
 <strong>Scenario</strong>: If Liberals (L) — historically pro-green tax — vote against, coalition loses majority (175 − 16 L seats = 159, below 175 threshold)<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: L party statements before chamber vote; any L dissenters emerging</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium">R03 — EU Green Deal Conflict <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium">R03 — EU Green Deal Conflict <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r03--eu-green-deal-conflict-medium"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 40%<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: European Commission monitoring member-state fossil subsidies; Sweden could face State Aid review<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: EU Regulation 2024/1679 requires member states to report fossil fuel subsidies<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: EC press releases; Swedish EU mission statements</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact">R05 — KU Hearing Governance Findings <em>(LOW probability, HIGH democratic impact)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact">R05 — KU Hearing Governance Findings <em>(LOW probability, HIGH democratic impact)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r05--ku-hearing-governance-findings-low-probability-high-democratic-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 20%<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: KU G16 examines Svantesson on fiscal framework processes; KU G34 examines Wallström on foreign policy decisions during S government<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: KU draft report language; any dissenting KU committee member statements</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium">R04 — Wind Power Law Legal Challenge <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium">R04 — Wind Power Law Legal Challenge <em>(MEDIUM)</em><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r04--wind-power-law-legal-challenge-medium"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 35%<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Developers may argue compensation calculation method violates property law; residents may argue amount too low<br>
 <strong>Monitoring trigger</strong>: Legal professional organizations' statements; first court filings post-implementation</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs">Risk Trend (Compared to Previous Realtime Runs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs">Risk Trend (Compared to Previous Realtime Runs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1010,8 +1010,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-trend-compared-to-previous-realtime-runs">Risk Trend (Compared t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk Area</th><th>Previous (1130/1240)</th><th>Current (1353)</th><th>Trend</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal accountability</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (FiU48 debate day)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>Energy policy</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (two major items)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional oversight</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM (hearings complete?)</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition stability</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>Climate targets</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (fuel tax cut)</td><td>↑</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-context-table">Context Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-table"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-context-table">Context Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-context-table">Context Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Analysis Date</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>Run</td><td>realtime-1353</td></tr><tr><td>Lead Doc</td><td>HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Secondary</td><td>Vindkraft intäktsdelning (new law)</td></tr><tr><td>Analyst Confidence</td><td>HIGH (live MCP data, committee report available)</td></tr><tr><td>Political Context</td><td>Tidöalliansen (M+SD+KD+L) governing coalition, 2022-2026 mandate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy">SWOT Analysis — Extra Budget FiU48 + Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy">SWOT Analysis — Extra Budget FiU48 + Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT: Extra Budget FiU48 + Vindkraft Incentives (2026-04-21)
     x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis--extra-budget-fiu48--energy-policy">SWOT Analysis — E
     Green transition tension: [0.72, 0.75]
     Opposition critique exposure: [0.78, 0.65]
     Fossil fuel lock-in risk: [0.80, 0.72]</pre>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Immediate consumer relief from fuel tax cut</td><td>FiU48 reduces fuel tax burden for ~6M vehicle owners; energy support helps ~3M households</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power revenue sharing builds local acceptance</td><td>Up to 9 turbine-heights radius compensation creates incentive for communes to approve farms</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Three-pillar vindkraftspaket coherence</td><td>Commune subsidies (budget 2025) → resident compensation (new law) → property buy-out study</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FiU approval signals coalition discipline</td><td>Finance Committee (FiU) approving extra budget shows M+SD+KD+L bloc cohesion</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-party fiscal pragmatism</td><td>Extra budget outside main annual budget cycle demonstrates crisis-response capability</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut undermines climate commitments</td><td>Sweden's 2030 fossil-free transport target conflicts with reducing fuel tax incentive</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Temporary energy support complexity</td><td>El- och gasprisstöd creates complex administration for Försäkringskassan/Skatteverket</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft compensation may be insufficient</td><td>Residents closest to turbines may still oppose; law-mandated minimum may not match market</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Extra budget process signals fiscal improvisation</td><td>Multiple extra changes budgets in one year suggests reactive rather than strategic fiscal planning</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Accelerate Sweden's fossil-free electricity buildout</td><td>If wind power expansion succeeds → Sweden can export renewable energy surplus → economic gain</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Energy price support → political dividend for coalition</td><td>Direct household relief 2026 → potential electoral credit before 2026 elections</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Property buy-out model from Denmark → innovation</td><td>Investigating Danish property inlösen model → potential Swedish innovation in land rights</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Reframing wind power from NIMBY to YIMBY</td><td>Revenue-sharing turns opponents into stakeholders → paradigm shift in local acceptance</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU hearings strengthen democratic accountability</td><td>Svantesson + Wallström hearings reinforce institutional norms of ministerial accountability</td><td>KU hearings</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1229,19 +1229,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut locks in fossil dependency</td><td>Each SEK/liter reduction reduces price signal for EV adoption; risks missing 2030 targets</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition may face EU criticism</td><td>EU Green Deal compliance tension if Sweden reduces fossil fuel taxes</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft compensation law challenged in court</td><td>Property rights vs. developer rights may trigger legal challenges from landowners</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition S may counter with alternative energy support</td><td>S-led opposition could propose more targeted support → political embarrassment</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>KU scrutiny may surface governance failures</td><td>Wallström (S) investigation could reveal policy failures damaging coalition's credibility</td><td>KU hearings</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics">Cross-Cutting SWOT Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics">Cross-Cutting SWOT Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cutting-swot-dynamics"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Strength–Threat Tension</strong>: The fuel tax cut provides genuine short-term consumer relief (S) but threatens long-term climate targets (T). This tension defines the political debate: coalition argues affordability NOW vs. opposition argues sustainability LATER.</p>
 <p><strong>Opportunity–Weakness Interaction</strong>: Wind power revenue sharing (O) directly addresses local opposition (W) but may be legally challenged (T). The Danish model study (O) signals openness to bolder reforms.</p>
 <p><strong>Scenario Dependency</strong>: If energy prices remain elevated through 2026, el- och gasprisstöd becomes politically essential and FiU48 looks prescient. If energy prices drop, the extra budget looks wasteful.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-level-assessment">Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-assessment"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-assessment">Threat Level Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH<br>
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (parliamentary session data, no classified sources)<br>
 <strong>Primary Threat Domain</strong>: Democratic Accountability + Climate Policy Integrity</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-active-threats">Active Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high">T01 — Climate Policy Integrity Threat (SEVERITY: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-active-threats">Active Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high">T01 — Climate Policy Integrity Threat (SEVERITY: HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Policy coherence threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: Riksdag coalition (M+SD+KD+L), EU Commission<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: The extra budget amendment FiU48 reducing fuel taxes creates a direct structural conflict with Sweden's 2030 climate targets (54% emissions reduction vs. 1990 levels, transport sector currently at -37%). Reduced fuel taxes decrease the economic incentive for EV adoption and carpooling, potentially adding 500,000-1,000,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent annually if sustained beyond 2026.</p>
@@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t01--climate-policy-integrity-threat-severity-high">T01 — Climate P
 <li>EU monitoring of member-state fossil fuel subsidies under Regulation 2024/1679</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Democratic dimension</strong>: Citizens who voted for parties with climate commitments (S, C, MP, V) may perceive this as a broken promise; trust in climate governance at risk.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium">T02 — Constitutional Oversight Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium">T02 — Constitutional Oversight Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Governance threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: KU Committee, Finance Minister Svantesson, former FM Wallström<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: The dual KU hearings on 2026-04-21 represent active constitutional scrutiny of both the current government (Svantesson/fiscal processes) and the previous S government (Wallström/foreign policy). If KU hearings reveal ministerial accountability failures, they could trigger formal KU findings that damage reputations and set constitutional precedents.</p>
@@ -1262,16 +1262,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-t02--constitutional-oversight-threat-severity-medium">T02 — Constit
 <li>Dual hearings same day = coordinated KU scrutiny</li>
 <li>HDA7KU42 (KU granskning meeting) same day suggests active investigation phase</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low">T03 — Social Cohesion Threat from Eating Disorder Care Failures (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low">T03 — Social Cohesion Threat from Eating Disorder Care Failures (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t03--social-cohesion-threat-from-eating-disorder-care-failures-severity-medium-low"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Social welfare governance threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: Region Stockholm, Finance Minister Svantesson, S opposition<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: HD10442 interpellation (Kallifatides/S → Svantesson/M) on eating disorder care in Region Stockholm suggests systemic underfunding of mental health services. If Svantesson's response is inadequate, opposition can escalate to formal motion for increased healthcare funding — potential wedge issue on social welfare vs. fiscal conservatism.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low">T04 — Occupational Health Capacity Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low">T04 — Occupational Health Capacity Threat (SEVERITY: MEDIUM-LOW)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t04--occupational-health-capacity-threat-severity-medium-low"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Category</strong>: Labor market governance threat<br>
 <strong>Actors</strong>: Labor Minister Johan Britz (L), S opposition<br>
 <strong>Description</strong>: HD10440 interpellation on företagsläkare (occupational physicians) highlights structural gap since Arbetslivsinstitutet abolished 2007. Sweden has approximately 500 active occupational physicians vs. estimated need of 1,500-2,000 — a 60-70% gap. This threatens workplace health monitoring, particularly in sectors with high injury/illness rates.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-triggers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1309,15 +1309,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-triggers">Monitoring Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Trigger Event</th><th>Threat</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote — any dissenting M/SD/KD/L votes</td><td>T02 (coalition stability)</td><td>1-3 days</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission climate progress report</td><td>T01 (fuel tax)</td><td>30-60 days</td></tr><tr><td>KU draft report on G16 (Svantesson)</td><td>T02 (constitutional)</td><td>30-90 days</td></tr><tr><td>S formal motion on ätstörningsvård</td><td>T03 (social welfare)</td><td>7-21 days</td></tr><tr><td>Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet response to ip HD10440</td><td>T04 (labor health)</td><td>21 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-level-medium-high">Threat Level: MEDIUM-HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-medium-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-level-medium-high">Threat Level: MEDIUM-HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-level-medium-high"></a></h3>
 <p>The combination of a significant fiscal policy move (FiU48) that tests coalition climate credibility, simultaneous constitutional hearings on both the current and previous governments, and multiple S opposition interpellations on social welfare issues creates a MEDIUM-HIGH aggregate threat environment to Swedish democratic governance quality for the period 2026-04-21 to 2026-05-21.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context">Overview: Sweden's Fuel Tax Cut + Wind Power Package in Nordic/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context">Overview: Sweden's Fuel Tax Cut + Wind Power Package in Nordic/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overview-swedens-fuel-tax-cut--wind-power-package-in-nordiceu-context"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis benchmarks Sweden's FiU48 (fuel tax reduction + energy price support) and vindkraft revenue-sharing law against 5+ comparable jurisdictions to assess where Sweden <strong>innovates</strong>, <strong>follows</strong>, or <strong>diverges</strong> from international best practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-baseline-comparison">Nordic Baseline Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-comparison"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-baseline-comparison">Nordic Baseline Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-baseline-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-denmark-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Denmark (Energy Policy)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (FiU48/vindkraft)</th><th>Denmark</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax strategy</td><td>REDUCING (extra budget 2026)</td><td>STABLE (maintaining carbon price)</td><td><strong>Sweden DIVERGES</strong> — DK maintains fuel price signal</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power local compensation</td><td>Revenue-sharing (up to 9 turbine heights)</td><td>Revenue-sharing + property buy-out rights</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS DK</strong> — copying DK model</td></tr><tr><td>Household energy support</td><td>Direct price support (el-/gasprisstöd)</td><td>Green check payments 2022-2023</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> (delayed vs. DK 2022)</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48, gov/vindkraft 2026-04-20</td><td>Danish Energy Agency 2024 report</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key divergence</strong>: Denmark abandoned fossil fuel tax reductions after 2022 energy crisis; Sweden is reintroducing them in 2026. Denmark chose carbon-price stability as a principle; Sweden prioritized short-term affordability. This reflects a fundamental policy philosophy difference.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy">Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy">Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-norway-fossil-fuel-policy">Sweden vs. Norway (Fossil Fuel P
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Norway</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax policy</td><td>Reducing (FiU48)</td><td>Stable, oil-revenue funds separate</td><td><strong>Sweden DIVERGES</strong> — Norway's oil fund provides fiscal buffer without tax cuts</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support mechanism</td><td>Direct price support</td><td>Electricity subsidy scheme 2022-2024</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> (similar mechanism, different timing)</td></tr><tr><td>Onshore wind opposition</td><td>High NIMBY resistance → revenue sharing law</td><td>High NIMBY resistance → revenue sharing law</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> — Norway's natural damage compensation model predates Sweden's</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48, gov/vindkraft</td><td>Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition">Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Transition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition">Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Transition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1430,8 +1430,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-finland-energy-transition">Sweden vs. Finland (Energy Trans
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Finland</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Nuclear + wind balance</td><td>Heavy wind buildout; nuclear moratorium ending</td><td>Both nuclear (Olkiluoto 3) and wind</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> — Finland's diversified approach is more energy-secure</td></tr><tr><td>Local compensation for wind</td><td>New revenue-sharing law 2026</td><td>Kuntakorvaus (municipal compensation) since 2019</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> (7 years behind Finland)</td></tr><tr><td>Household energy support</td><td>FiU48 electricity support</td><td>State electricity subsidy 2022-2023</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48; Finnish Energy Authority</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-eu-benchmark-comparison">EU Benchmark Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-benchmark-comparison"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison">Sweden vs. Germany (Energiewende Comparison)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-benchmark-comparison">EU Benchmark Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-benchmark-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison">Sweden vs. Germany (Energiewende Comparison)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-germany-energiewende-comparison">Sweden vs. Germany (Energi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Germany</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax policy 2026</td><td>Reducing</td><td>STABLE (post-Tankrabatt controversy)</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS controversial path</strong> — Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt (€0.30/L rebate) was widely criticized as regressive and ineffective</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power expansion</td><td>3-step incentive package</td><td>Bürgerbeteiligung (citizen participation) model</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS</strong> — German model since 2023 requires 0.2 ct/kWh payout to local residents (similar to Swedish law)</td></tr><tr><td>Energy price support targeting</td><td>Broad (all households)</td><td>Targeted (low-income households, Wohngeld)</td><td><strong>Sweden DIVERGES</strong> — Sweden's approach is less targeted, less effective for most vulnerable</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48; German Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1500,22 +1500,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-sweden-vs-netherlands-energy-policy">Sweden vs. Netherlands (Energy P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden</th><th>Netherlands</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax stance</td><td>Reducing</td><td>Reduced then restored (2022-2025)</td><td><strong>Sweden FOLLOWS Dutch model</strong> — NL reduced fuel tax 2022, restored 2024; Sweden appears to follow similar path</td></tr><tr><td>Wind local opposition</td><td>Revenue sharing</td><td>SDE+ (Stimulering Duurzame Energieproductie) includes local benefits</td><td><strong>Sweden CONVERGES</strong> with Dutch community benefit approach</td></tr><tr><td>Data source</td><td>FiU48; Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation">Areas of Swedish Innovation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture">Innovation 1: Three-Step Vindkraftspaket Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation">Areas of Swedish Innovation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-of-swedish-innovation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture">Innovation 1: Three-Step Vindkraftspaket Architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-1-three-step-vindkraftspaket-architecture"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's coordinated three-step approach (commune subsidies → resident compensation → property buy-out study) is <strong>more systematic</strong> than any single Nordic/EU country's wind acceptance policy. While Denmark has individual elements, Sweden's unified legislative package from one government is structurally innovative.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: gov/vindkraft announcement 2026-04-20; Johan Britz three-step description</p>
-<h3 id="rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget">Innovation 2: Combining Fiscal Relief + Green Policy in Single Extra Budget<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget">Innovation 2: Combining Fiscal Relief + Green Policy in Single Extra Budget<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-innovation-2-combining-fiscal-relief--green-policy-in-single-extra-budget"></a></h4>
 <p>The FiU48 design—cutting fuel taxes while simultaneously providing energy support AND launching a wind power law—creates a "green-fiscal hybrid" that avoids pure fossil subsidy framing. No exact EU parallel found.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01FiU48; gov/vindkraft</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models">Areas Where Sweden Follows International Models<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models">Areas Where Sweden Follows International Models<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-follows-international-models"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Wind power local compensation</strong>: Sweden explicitly studies Danish property buy-out model (confirmed by Britz statement)</li>
 <li><strong>Energy price support</strong>: Follows 2022-2023 Nordic/EU precedents (Denmark, Norway, Finland all implemented similar schemes earlier)</li>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax reduction</strong>: Follows Germany's controversial 2022 Tankrabatt — with documented ineffectiveness risks</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags">Areas Where Sweden Diverges (Risk Flags)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags">Areas Where Sweden Diverges (Risk Flags)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-areas-where-sweden-diverges-risk-flags">Areas Where Sweden Diverges (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Divergence</th><th>Jurisdictions where Sweden differs</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax reduction while peers maintain</td><td>DK, NO, FI, DE (post-Tankrabatt)</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — Sweden isolated in reverse fossil policy direction</td></tr><tr><td>Broad vs. targeted energy support</td><td>vs. Germany, UK, NL (means-tested)</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Regressive distribution risk</td></tr><tr><td>No sunset clause on fuel tax cut</td><td>vs. most EU peers who time-limited cuts</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — Risk of permanent fossil subsidy lock-in</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>World Bank: Energy data Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland</li>
 <li>EU Commission: State Aid monitoring, fossil subsidy reporting</li>
@@ -1553,11 +1553,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-sources">Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>Finnish Energy Authority (Energiavirasto)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-security-classification-public">Security Classification: PUBLIC<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-classification-public"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-security-classification-public">Security Classification: PUBLIC<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-classification-public"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents analyzed are publicly available via Riksdag and Government APIs.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact">Document Classification by CIA Triad Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact">Document Classification by CIA Triad Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-by-cia-triad-impact">Document Classification
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbrev.)</th><th>Confidentiality</th><th>Integrity</th><th>Availability</th><th>RTO</th><th>RPO</th><th>Overall</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra budget — fuel tax + energy</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (fiscal law)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou1</td><td>KU Svantesson hearing</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (constitutional)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou2</td><td>KU Wallström hearing</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (constitutional)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>gov/vindkraft</td><td>Vindkraft intäktsdelning law</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>HIGH (new legislation)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Daily</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441/40/42</td><td>Interpellationer</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>MEDIUM (procedural)</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>N/A</td><td>Weekly</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">Policy Domain Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1661,13 +1661,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-domain-classification">Policy Domain Classification<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Documents</th><th>ISMS Relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal Policy</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Government budget integrity</td></tr><tr><td>Energy Policy</td><td>HD01FiU48, gov/vindkraft</td><td>Critical infrastructure (energy sector)</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional Oversight</td><td>KU hearings</td><td>Democratic governance integrity</td></tr><tr><td>Labor/Health</td><td>HD10440, HD10441</td><td>Social welfare governance</td></tr><tr><td>Social Welfare</td><td>HD10442</td><td>Healthcare accountability</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-gdpr--privacy-notes">GDPR / Privacy Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gdpr--privacy-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-gdpr--privacy-notes">GDPR / Privacy Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-gdpr--privacy-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>No personal data beyond publicly elected officials' names</li>
 <li>KU hearing transcripts are public records</li>
 <li>No special category personal data processed</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-information-lifecycle">Information Lifecycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-lifecycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-lifecycle">Information Lifecycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-lifecycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1702,11 +1702,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-lifecycle">Information Lifecycle<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Collection</td><td>MCP API query (public sources)</td></tr><tr><td>Processing</td><td>AI analysis by automated agent</td></tr><tr><td>Storage</td><td>Git repository (public)</td></tr><tr><td>Publication</td><td>GitHub Pages (public)</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Indefinite (public record)</td></tr><tr><td>Deletion</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context">Tidöalliansen Mandate Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context">Tidöalliansen Mandate Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidöalliansen-mandate-context"></a></h3>
 <p>The Tidöalliansen government (M+SD+KD+L) has governed since October 2022. The 2026 parliamentary election is expected in September 2026, making spring 2026 a critical pre-election period. Both FiU48 and the vindkraft law carry significant electoral framing implications — this classification note is relevant for interpreting the political intent behind simultaneous policy announcements.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-relationship-network">Document Relationship Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-network"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-document-relationship-network">Document Relationship Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-relationship-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     FiU48["HD01FiU48\nExtra Budget 2026\nFuel Tax + Energy Support"] 
     VK["gov/vindkraft\nVindkraft Intäktsdelning\nNew Revenue-Sharing Law"]
@@ -1729,29 +1729,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-relationship-network">Document Relationship Network<a class=
     style IP42 fill:#888888,color:#fff
     style IP40 fill:#888888,color:#fff
     style IP41 fill:#888888,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead">Cluster A — Affordability + Energy (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-clusters">Thematic Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead">Cluster A — Affordability + Energy (LEAD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--affordability--energy-lead"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01FiU48</strong> ← LEAD: Extra budget, fuel tax, energy support</li>
 <li><strong>gov/vindkraft</strong> ← SECOND: Wind power revenue sharing law</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-link</strong>: Both involve Energy/Climate portfolio; both are "relief + green" framing</li>
 <li><strong>Minister responsible</strong>: Svantesson (fiscal), Britz (energy/climate)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability">Cluster B — Constitutional Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability">Cluster B — Constitutional Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--constitutional-accountability"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HDC220260421ou1</strong> ← KU hearing: Svantesson (current M government)</li>
 <li><strong>HDC220260421ou2</strong> ← KU hearing: Wallström (previous S government)</li>
 <li><strong>HDA7KU42</strong> ← KU granskning meeting (same day)</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-link</strong>: KU's annual constitutional review examining both coalition and opposition eras</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations">Cluster C — Social Policy Probing (Opposition Interpellations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations">Cluster C — Social Policy Probing (Opposition Interpellations)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--social-policy-probing-opposition-interpellations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD10442</strong> ← Ätstörningsvård → Finance Minister (M healthcare accountability)</li>
 <li><strong>HD10440</strong> ← Företagsläkare → Labor Minister (occupational health gaps)</li>
 <li><strong>HD10441</strong> ← Rättssäkerhet → Justice Minister (court accountability)</li>
 <li><strong>Pattern</strong>: S-party interpellations targeting three different ministers = coordinated opposition pressure campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-run-references">Cross-Run References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-run-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-run-references">Cross-Run References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-run-references"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-run-references">Cross-Run References<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior Run</th><th>Key Findings</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>realtime-1130</td><td>KU hearings + FiU48 initial coverage</td><td>LOST (session expired)</td></tr><tr><td>realtime-1240</td><td>KU hearings + FiU48 deep analysis</td><td>LOST (session expired)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>realtime-1353</strong></td><td><strong>REPUBLICATION + vindkraft new addition</strong></td><td><strong>THIS RUN</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1821,8 +1821,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Forward Event</th><th>Expected Date</th><th>Linked Docs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote</td><td>2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>KU G16 draft report</td><td>2026-05 to 2026-06</td><td>HDC220260421ou1</td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law implementation</td><td>2026-mid</td><td>gov/vindkraft</td></tr><tr><td>IP response: Strömmer on rättssäkerhet</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HD10441</td></tr><tr><td>IP response: Britz on företagsläkare</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HD10440</td></tr><tr><td>IP response: Svantesson on ätstörningsvård</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HD10442</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-application-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1896,9 +1896,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-application-matrix">Methodology Application Matrix<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Methodology</th><th>Applied?</th><th>Files Produced</th><th>Quality Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>synthesis-summary, executive-brief</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>per-file-political-intelligence.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>HD01FiU48 doc analysis in synthesis</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>political-swot-framework.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>PASS — 4 quadrants, evidence tables, Mermaid</td></tr><tr><td>political-risk-methodology.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>PASS — 8 risks, probability/impact</td></tr><tr><td>political-threat-framework.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>PASS — confidence labels, actors</td></tr><tr><td>political-classification-guide.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>classification-results.md</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>political-style-guide.md</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>All narrative sections</td><td>PASS — specific actors, no generic phrases</td></tr><tr><td>DIW (Democratic Impact Weighting)</td><td>✅ YES</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>PASS — HD01FiU48 = 9.0/10 lead</td></tr><tr><td>9-Artifact Completeness Gate</td><td>✅ PASS (9/9)</td><td>All required</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>14-Artifact Reference-Grade Gate</td><td>✅ PASS (14/14)</td><td>All Tier-C</td><td>PASS</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation">Upstream Watchpoint Reconciliation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-upstream-watchpoint-reconciliation"></a></h3>
 <p><em>(Every forward indicator from last 2 days of sibling realtime-monitor runs, explicitly carried forward or retired with reason)</em></p>
-<h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory">From realtime-1130 (2026-04-21 ~11:30) — LOST run, reconstructed from memory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory">From realtime-1130 (2026-04-21 ~11:30) — LOST run, reconstructed from memory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memory"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1130-2026-04-21-1130--lost-run-reconstructed-from-memor
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Status</th><th>Disposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 committee debate outcome</td><td>Carried forward — committee approved</td><td><strong>RESOLVED: FiU48 approved, debate today</strong></td></tr><tr><td>KU hearing G16 Svantesson</td><td>Carried forward</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Hearing completed 11:00, findings pending</strong></td></tr><tr><td>KU hearing G34 Wallström</td><td>Carried forward</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Hearing completed 12:00, findings pending</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction">From realtime-1240 (2026-04-21 ~12:40) — LOST run, memory reconstruction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction">From realtime-1240 (2026-04-21 ~12:40) — LOST run, memory reconstruction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-from-realtime-1240-2026-04-21-1240--lost-run-memory-reconstruction">F
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Watchpoint</th><th>Status</th><th>Disposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 chamber vote timing</td><td>Forward indicator: 24-48h from committee approval</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Vote expected 2026-04-22 to 2026-04-24</strong></td></tr><tr><td>KU hearings → draft report</td><td>Forward indicator: 30-60 days</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Forwarded to this run's scenario analysis</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Vindkraft law — first legislative steps</td><td>Not identified in 1240 run</td><td><strong>NEW: Announced 2026-04-20, not covered in 1240</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Interpellation responses x3</td><td>Forward indicator</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Expected 2026-04-28</strong></td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission fuel subsidy monitoring</td><td>Forward indicator</td><td><strong>ACTIVE: Tracked in R03, scenario-analysis</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-all-watchpoints-summary">All Watchpoints Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-watchpoints-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-all-watchpoints-summary">All Watchpoints Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-watchpoints-summary"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>4 RESOLVED or progressed</strong>: FiU48 committee → approved</li>
 <li><strong>6 ACTIVE</strong>: Chamber vote, KU findings, vindkraft implementation, 3 interpellation responses, EU monitoring</li>
@@ -1970,13 +1970,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-all-watchpoints-summary">All Watchpoints Summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-21 13:55 UTC
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: realtime-1353
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: riksdag-regering-mcp (32 tools), get_sync_status, search_dokument, get_betankanden, get_interpellationer, get_propositioner, search_regering
 <strong>MCP Status</strong>: live (2026-04-21T13:53:57Z)
 <strong>Documents Analyzed</strong>: 7 primary + 4 government press releases</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21">Primary Documents (date-filtered 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21">Primary Documents (date-filtered 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-documents-date-filtered-2026-04-21">Primary Documents (date-f
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Title</th><th>Organ</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>bet</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>FiU</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou1</td><td>sam-ou</td><td>KU-utfrågning med finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>KU</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HDC220260421ou2</td><td>sam-ou</td><td>KU-utfrågning med tidigare utrikesminister Margot Wallström (S)</td><td>KU</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>ip</td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>-</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>ip</td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>-</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>ip</td><td>Uttalanden om ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm</td><td>-</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>bet</td><td>Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning</td><td>TU</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20">Government Press Releases (2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20">Government Press Releases (2026-04-20)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2071,15 +2071,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-government-press-releases-2026-04-20">Government Press Releases (2026
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Title</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>regeringen-okar-incitamenten-for-ny-vindkraft</td><td>Regeringen ökar incitamenten för ny vindkraft (intäktsdelning)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>starkta-insatser-for-samhallsplacerade-barn...</td><td>Stärkta insatser för samhällsplacerade barn (SiS)</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>154-miljoner-kronor-i-stod-till-demokrati-...</td><td>15,4 miljoner kronor i stöd till Ukraina</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>riksrevisionens-rapport-om-tandvardsstodet</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport om Tandvårdsstödet</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-previous-run-status">Previous Run Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-previous-run-status">Previous Run Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-previous-run-status"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Run realtime-1240 (run_id: 24722758908): <strong>FAILED_SESSION_EXPIRED</strong> — articles lost, no published PR</li>
 <li>Run realtime-1130: Status unknown, likely covered HD01FiU48 but PR may have failed</li>
 <li><strong>Conclusion</strong>: All today's content requires republication</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-assessment">Lead Story Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary Lead</strong>: HD01FiU48 — Riksdag Finance Committee approves extra budget amendment reducing fuel taxes and providing energy price support (FiU48 debate scheduled 2026-04-21)</p>
 <p><strong>Secondary</strong>: Wind power revenue-sharing law — new compensation for residents near turbines (new proposition by Acting Climate Minister Johan Britz)</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-21/realtime-1353/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -2116,7 +2133,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:08.752Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:30.171Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html b/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html
index 6c2bcacd1c..8975b9ff99 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.848Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.272Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:08.848Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.272Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-22T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief","description":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package today (HD01FiU48) with an anomalous M+SD+S+KD supermajority — the Social Democrats abandoning their climate…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:08.848Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief","description":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package today (HD01FiU48) with an anomalous M+SD+S+KD supermajority — the Social Democrats abandoning their climate…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:30.272Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package today (HD01FiU48) with an anomalous M+SD+S+KD supermajority — the Social Democrats abandoning their climate counter-motion to avoid being blamed for high fuel costs four months before the September 2026 election. Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) simultaneously faces a concentrated five-interpellation accountability offensive from S, including one (HD10442) citing a court ruling that her public statements on eating disorder care were factually incorrect. The Spring Proposition 2026 (HD03100) sets the pre-election fiscal battleground.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Media/editorial decision</strong>: Is the "S votes for fuel tax cut while filing counter-motion" narrative the lead story for the day? → <strong>Yes.</strong> The dual-track behaviour (HD01FiU48 vote Ja + HD024082 opposing motion) is the most analytically significant finding of the day. It reveals S's electoral calculation — pre-election cost-of-living calculus overrides climate consistency. Confidence: HIGH [A1].</p>
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Support
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-bullet-read">⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-bullet-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-bullet-read">⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-bullet-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>ENACTED TODAY</strong>: HD01FiU48 — 4.1 GSEK fuel tax cut &#x26; energy support, voted 16:29. M+SD+S+KD voted Ja.</li>
 <li><strong>STRATEGIC CONTRADICTION</strong>: S votes Ja on enacted bill but filed opposition motion (HD024082) against same policy.</li>
@@ -246,11 +246,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-bullet-read">⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read<a class="" aria-hid
 <li><strong>CLIMATE-FISCAL DIVIDE</strong>: MP+V+S filed parallel climate counter-motions even as S voted for the fuel tax relief.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch for</strong>: Riksdag debate on HD10442 (Svantesson ätstörningsvård IP) — scheduled post-May 5. If Svantesson cannot reconcile her prior public statements with the court ruling, this becomes the biggest ministerial accountability moment of the pre-election period. Probability of significant political damage: <strong>Likely</strong> [B2] (65%).</p>
 <p><strong>Secondary trigger</strong>: S's position on HD03100 vårproposition in FiU committee proceedings — their alternative fiscal document will define the election economic debate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-dashboard">📊 Confidence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-dashboard">📊 Confidence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1B5E20', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'nodeBorder': '#FFFFFF'}}}%%
 pie title Confidence Distribution by Admiralty Code
     "A1 — Confirmed/Reliable (60%)" : 60
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--confidence-dashboard">📊 Confidence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li>Svantesson's parliamentary exposure from HD10442 court reference</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Synthesis ID</strong>: SYN-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 23:50 UTC
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~144 (September 13, 2026)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY: HD01FiU48 ENACTED — Extra Ändringsbudget 4.1 GSEK adopted today by anomalous cross-party supermajority</strong></p>
 <p>The Finance Committee betänkande HD01FiU48 (proposition HD03236) was voted through at 16:29:36 on 2026-04-22 with support from M, SD, S, and KD — a politically extraordinary coalition. The package temporarily cuts petrol tax by 82 öre/litre and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ (May–September 2026) and provides electricity/gas price support for January–February 2026 consumers. The combined budget deterioration is 4.1 billion SEK. The fact that S (opposition) voted <em>alongside</em> the governing coalition on an energy-relief package four months before the September 2026 election reveals both the political potency of energy costs as an electoral issue and the limits of S's climate positioning when household economics dominate the news cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100 + HD0399) — Pre-election fiscal positioning battle begins</strong></p>
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>QUATERNARY: Cross-party opposition climate fracture — S+V+MP file parallel counter-motions on fuel tax cut (HD024082/092/098)</strong></p>
 <p>Three opposition parties filed nearly identical counter-motions rejecting HD03236 on climate grounds. Yet S voted <em>for</em> HD01FiU48 (the committee betänkande) — a strategic contradiction that signals S's dual-track posture: oppose symbolically in committee motions while supporting the relief measure in the chamber to avoid being blamed for higher energy costs.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A["🔴 CRITICAL — TIER 1&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48: Extra Budget ADOPTED&#x3C;br/>4.1 GSEK | Cross-party M+SD+S+KD&#x3C;br/>DIW 9.2 | Confidence: HIGH [A1]"]
     B["🟠 HIGH — TIER 2&#x3C;br/>HD03100: Vårproposition 2026&#x3C;br/>Pre-election fiscal framework&#x3C;br/>DIW 9.0 | Confidence: HIGH [A1]"]
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence
     style G fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF,stroke:#90CAF9
     style H fill:#37474F,color:#FFFFFF,stroke:#90A4AE</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "💰 FISCAL EMERGENCY (FiU)"
         FIU48["HD01FiU48&#x3C;br/>ENACTED 16:29 TODAY&#x3C;br/>4.1 GSEK fuel+energy relief"]
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence
     style KU33 fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     style HD3232 fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>S voted <em>for</em> HD01FiU48 fuel tax cut while simultaneously filing counter-motion HD024082 — dual-track strategy exposing electoral calculation over climate consistency</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote records + HD024082 (riksdagen.se)</td><td>Pre-election horse-trading overrides climate principle</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD10442 places Svantesson in accountability spotlight: court upheld Region Stockholm's position that her public statements were factually wrong</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se IP filed 2026-04-21)</td><td>Ministerial credibility risk during budget season</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Vårproposition HD03100 is the final pre-election fiscal manifesto; S will use every clause as an election battleground</td><td>HD03100 (riksdagen.se, Finansdepartementet, 2026-04-13)</td><td>Defines economic agenda for September 2026</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Two simultaneous grundlag first readings (HD01KU33 + HD01KU32) represent extraordinary legislative tempo for constitutional changes</td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32 (riksdagen.se)</td><td>Long-cycle: effects felt in 2027–2028</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Sweden joining both the Ukraina compensation register (HD03232) and aggression tribunal (HD03231) signals deepening Western alignment on post-war accountability</td><td>HD03232 + HD03231 (riksdagen.se, UU committee)</td><td>Geopolitical commitment beyond NATO membership</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Collection method</strong>: Open-source parliamentary records (riksdagen.se API via riksdag-regering MCP). All documents are publicly filed (GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)).
 <strong>PIR coverage</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -420,47 +420,47 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Meta Description: "The Riksdag voted through a 4.1 billion SEK fuel tax and energy price relief package on April 22, 2026 — with the opposition Social Democrats joining the governing coalition in an extraordinary cross-party majority, signalling the start of the pre-election economic battle."</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Assessment ID</strong>: IA-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] overall
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days to election</strong>: 144</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>The S dual-track strategy on HD01FiU48 — voting Ja in chamber while filing climate counter-motion — is a deliberate electoral calculation, not a policy incoherence.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: S MPs on FiU voted Ja at 16:29 2026-04-22 (riksdagen.se vote record CE14CCEF) while the same party filed HD024082 opposing the same proposition the preceding week. Both actions are confirmed primary-source facts. The strategic logic — avoiding blame for high energy costs while signalling climate credentials to the base — is the only coherent explanation.</p>
 <p><strong>Key Assumption</strong>: S believes the general electorate prioritises cost-of-living over climate consistency in the final 144 days before September 2026 election. If polling shows climate consistently dominating economic concerns (LOW probability), this judgment would be revised.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-1</strong>: What is S's unified electoral positioning on fiscal policy? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — dual-track confirmed.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) faces a heightened ministerial accountability risk from interpellation HD10442 because the court documentation attached makes denial structurally difficult.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10442 (riksdagen.se, filed 2026-04-21 by Markus Kallifatides, S) references a court ruling that upheld Region Stockholm's position on eating disorder care — a position directly contradicting Svantesson's public statements. The accountability chain is: (1) Svantesson makes public statement, (2) Region Stockholm challenges in court, (3) court upholds Region Stockholm, (4) S files IP citing court ruling. Step 4 confirmed; ministerial exposure is probable [B2] but not certain — a skilled parliamentary response could neutralise it.</p>
 <p><strong>Key Assumption</strong>: Svantesson's original statements were indeed the ones characterised in the IP. If the IP mischaracterises her statements (possible [C3]), this judgment weakens.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-2</strong>: Is ministerial accountability creating pre-election risk? → <strong>PARTIALLY ANSWERED</strong> — exposure identified, outcome TBD.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>The Spring Proposition 2026 (HD03100) — the last vårproposition before the September 2026 election — defines the central economic battleground, and S will systematically contest every major fiscal assumption.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: VERY HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD03100 (riksdagen.se, Finansdepartementet, 2026-04-13 by Elisabeth Svantesson) is the formal statement of the government's multi-year fiscal framework. The document sets riktlinjer (spending guidelines) and fiscal targets. Sweden GDP growth 2024: 0.82% (World Bank), 2023: −0.20% — weak trajectory provides S with ammunition. Every budget assumption becomes campaign material.</p>
 <p><strong>Key Assumption</strong>: Swedish parliamentary calendar proceeds normally. No early election disrupts the standard committee proceedings.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-3</strong>: What fiscal framework defines the election battle? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — HD03100 confirmed as the battleground document.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>The simultaneous grundlag first readings (HD01KU33 + HD01KU32) reflect an unusually active constitutional reform agenda that will require a second reading in the next riksmöte — creating campaign complications for all parties.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01KU33 (husrannsakan insyn) and HD01KU32 (medietillgänglighet) are both in first reading (vilande) as of 2026-04-22 (riksdagen.se, KU committee). Both are grundlag changes requiring second reading after election. This means whichever party/coalition wins September 2026 will inherit these constitutional changes — creating electoral accountability for their content.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-4</strong>: Constitutional reform pipeline status? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — two simultaneous first readings active.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden's accession to both the Ukraina compensation commission (HD03232) and the international aggression tribunal (HD03231) on the same day signals a coherent and deepening Western alignment commitment beyond mere NATO membership.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD03232 + HD03231 (riksdagen.se, UU committee, submitted 2026-04-16) — both passed through riksdag committee process and submitted by Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M). Two distinct legal frameworks on the same day = coordinated foreign policy signalling.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-5</strong>: Sweden's Ukraine commitment trajectory? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — deepening confirmed.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21">Prior-Cycle PIR Continuity (Carried-Forward from 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21">Prior-Cycle PIR Continuity (Carried-Forward from 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21">Prior-Cyc
 <li>PIR-C: How will EU Commission respond to fuel tax measures in HD03236?</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -537,13 +537,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>If wrong...</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S's Ja vote on HD01FiU48 was deliberate strategy</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td><td>Low</td><td>If S claims it was a party discipline failure, KJ-1 weakens but remains directionally correct</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson's statements were as characterised in HD10442</td><td>MEDIUM [B2]</td><td>HIGH</td><td>If mischaracterised, KJ-2 collapses</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 vårproposition proceeds to committee vote normally</td><td>VERY HIGH [A1]</td><td>Low</td><td>Extremely low probability of committee blocking</td></tr><tr><td>Election remains on schedule September 13, 2026</td><td>VERY HIGH [A1]</td><td>Low</td><td>Early election (5% probability, Wild Card W1)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Methodology</strong>: DIW weighting per significance-scoring.md template
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Cross-type synthesis of 20 key documents across 4 article types</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-scoring-framework">📊 DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-scoring-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">📊 DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-framework"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-scoring-framework">📊 DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Weight</th><th>Scale</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>D (Depth)</td><td>25%</td><td>1–10</td><td>Breadth/completeness of source document</td></tr><tr><td>I (Immediacy)</td><td>40%</td><td>1–10</td><td>Recency; speed of real-world effect</td></tr><tr><td>W (Width of Impact)</td><td>35%</td><td>1–10</td><td>Population affected; policy breadth</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>DIW Score = (D × 0.25) + (I × 0.40) + (W × 0.35), normalised to 10</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-documents">Ranked Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-documents">Ranked Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-documents"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D1["🏆 9.2 | HD01FiU48&#x3C;br/>Extra ändringsbudget ENACTED&#x3C;br/>Voted 2026-04-22 16:29"]
     D2["🥈 9.0 | HD03100&#x3C;br/>Vårproposition 2026&#x3C;br/>Pre-election fiscal framework"]
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-documents">Ranked Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
     style D12 fill:#37474F,color:#FFFFFF
     style D13 fill:#546E7A,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table">Detailed DIW Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table">Detailed DIW Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -737,17 +737,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table">Detailed DIW Scoring Table<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abridged)</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget ENACTED</td><td>9</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.2</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.5</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD10442</td><td>Ätstörningsvård IP</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Husrannsakan insyn (grundlag)</td><td>9</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.1</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya elsystemlagar</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraina skadeståndskomm.</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Medietillgänglighet (grundlag)</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.9</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt IP</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024082</td><td>S counter-motion fuel tax</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.5</strong></td><td>[B2]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If S had voted Nej on HD01FiU48</strong>: The electoral and strategic significance score would drop from 9.2 to 7.0 — the measure would be a standard coalition achievement, not a cross-party anomaly.</p>
 <p><strong>If HD10442 debate is scheduled before the election</strong>: Significance rises from 8.3 to 9.0+ if Svantesson cannot credibly respond to the court documentation.</p>
 <p><strong>If HD03100 Vårproposition fails FiU committee vote</strong>: This would be a constitutional crisis; significance would reach 10.0. Probability: Remote [E5] (&#x3C;3%).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Media Framing
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predictions">Per-Party Framing Predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predictions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-party-framing-predictions">Per-Party Framing Predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predictions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predictions">Per-Party Framing Predictions<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Expected framing of HD01FiU48</th><th>Expected framing of S interpellations</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>"Responsible relief for Swedish households"</td><td>Dismissal: "political theatre"</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>"We delivered for ordinary Swedes"</td><td>Attack: "Why did S wait until now?"</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>"Family economic relief"</td><td>Neutral — own issues dominate</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>"We refused to increase fossil dependency"</td><td>Neutral — differentiation</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>"Relief for families + we hold government accountable"</td><td>"Concrete accountability on every front"</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>"Wrong tool — climate regression"</td><td>Supportive of IP accountability</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>"Pre-election populism at climate cost"</td><td>Mixed — supports welfare IPs</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Split: rural C supports, urban C opposes</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-media-quadrant-analysis">Media Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-quadrant-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-media-quadrant-analysis">Media Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-quadrant-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Media Framing: HD01FiU48 Coverage Prediction
@@ -817,27 +817,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-media-quadrant-analysis">Media Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidd
     SVT: [0.50, 0.90]
     SR: [0.48, 0.75]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-framing-battles">Key Framing Battles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-framing-battles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy">Battle 1: "Relief" vs. "Fossil Subsidy"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-framing-battles">Key Framing Battles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-framing-battles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy">Battle 1: "Relief" vs. "Fossil Subsidy"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government + S framing</strong>: This is household cost relief for families facing high fuel bills</li>
 <li><strong>V+MP+L framing</strong>: This is a retrograde fossil fuel subsidy at exactly the wrong moment</li>
 <li><strong>Prediction</strong>: Relief framing will dominate Swedish tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) in the short term; fossil subsidy framing will dominate opinion/editorial pages (DN, SvD environmental desks)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist">Battle 2: S Credibility — "Consistent Opposition" vs. "Opportunist"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist">Battle 2: S Credibility — "Consistent Opposition" vs. "Opportunist"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S framing</strong>: We support families AND hold the government accountable</li>
 <li><strong>Government parties framing</strong>: S voted Ja for the measure they filed a motion against — they cannot be trusted</li>
 <li><strong>Prediction</strong>: Government parties will use the dual-track contradiction in campaign ads. S will rely on voters not tracking committee motions.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction">Battle 3: "Accountability" vs. "Obstruction"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction">Battle 3: "Accountability" vs. "Obstruction"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S framing (interpellations)</strong>: We ask hard questions with court documentation</li>
 <li><strong>Government framing</strong>: Opposition filibustering pre-election with procedural tools</li>
 <li><strong>Prediction</strong>: HD10442 eating disorder court documentation makes this difficult to dismiss as obstruction — media will cover the specific case</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-radar">Narrative Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-radar">Narrative Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-radar"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Dominant expected narrative for 2026-04-22 evening news</strong>:</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Riksdag enacts fuel tax relief with broad cross-party support, while Socialdemokraterna simultaneously signals opposition through committee motions — and files five accountability interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson."</p>
@@ -845,12 +845,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-radar">Narrative Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>This narrative is</strong>: Complex (two S positions simultaneously), high-stakes (144 days to election), and rich in specifics (the court documentation elevates HD10442 above typical political theatre).</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B3] — media framing prediction based on structural analysis of party positions and historical press coverage patterns; not verified against actual press coverage.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: stakeholder-impact.md (6-lens matrix, named actors)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network-overview">Influence Network Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-overview">Influence Network Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     GOV["Tidö Government&#x3C;br/>M+KD+L+C"]
@@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network-overview">Influence Network Overview<a class="" ari
     style SVAN fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style KALI fill:#C62828,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc">Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc">Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M), Acting PM Lotta Edholm (L), Minister Johan Britz (KD), Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)</p>
 
 
@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc">Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position on HD01FiU48</th><th>Position on Vårproposition</th><th>Threat exposure</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td>Champion — authored via Finansdepartementet</td><td>Architect of HD03100</td><td>HIGH — Svantesson accountability (HD10442)</td><td>HD03100/HD03236 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td>Supported</td><td>Supported</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote</td></tr><tr><td>L (Liberalerna)</td><td>Supported (Edholm co-signed HD03236)</td><td>Supported</td><td>MEDIUM — wind power YIMBY frictions</td><td>HD03239 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>C (Centerpartiet)</td><td>Supported</td><td>Supported</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM — filed partial opposition motion HD024095 on utvisning</td><td>HD024095 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-support-party-sd">Lens 2: Support Party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-support-party-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-support-party-sd">Lens 2: Support Party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-support-party-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Julia Kronlid, Patrick Reslow, Björn Söder (SD, voted Ja on HD01FiU48)</p>
 
 
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-support-party-sd">Lens 2: Support Party (SD)<a class="" aria-h
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Position</th><th>Analysis</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48</td><td>SD prioritises cost-of-living measures for their voter base; fuel tax cut directly benefits SD's working-class electorate</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote records, riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>No counter-motion filed</td><td>SD has no climate objections to fuel tax cut — consistent with their anti-green agenda</td><td>Absence of SD counter-motion (riksdagen.se)</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine IPs: unclear</td><td>SD's position on HD03232 (Ukraina commission) not confirmed in available data</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s">Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s">Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Kenneth G. Forslund, Anders Ygeman, Mikael Damberg, Fredrik Olovsson (FiU), Markus Kallifatides, Peder Björk, Jonathan Svensson, Åsa Eriksson (interpellants)</p>
 
 
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s">Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Action</th><th>Strategic calculation</th><th>Contradiction</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48</td><td>Electoral calculus: cannot be seen opposing household energy relief 4 months before election</td><td>Simultaneously filed HD024082 opposing the same policy</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote + HD024082 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Filed 5 interpellations in 48 hours</td><td>Pre-election accountability escalation</td><td>None — internally consistent strategy</td><td>HD10442–HD10446 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Coordinated HD10442 with court evidence</td><td>Strongest possible accountability mechanism — court ruling makes denial impossible</td><td>May overreach if Svantesson issues convincing clarification</td><td>HD10442 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v">Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP, V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v">Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP, V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Opposition MPs filing HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP), HD024090 (V), HD024097 (MP), HD024096 (MP)</p>
 
 
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v">Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP,
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Key concern</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MP (Miljöpartiet)</td><td>Opposed HD01FiU48; filed 5 motions including HD024098</td><td>Climate catastrophism risk from fuel tax cut</td><td>HD024098 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td>Opposed HD01FiU48; filed HD024092, HD024090-091</td><td>Economic justice + anti-arms export (HD024091)</td><td>HD024092 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Both parties</td><td>Opposed new utvisning rules but with different framings</td><td>V: rule-of-law; MP: human rights</td><td>HD024090/097 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors">Lens 5: Civil Society / Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors">Lens 5: Civil Society / Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors">Lens 5: Civil Society / I
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Relevance</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Region Stockholm</td><td>Vindicated by court in eating disorder care case referenced in HD10442</td><td>HD10442 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Riksrevisionen (NAO)</td><td>Filed two reports: HD01MJU21 (climate transition in agriculture) + HD01CU42 (estate management)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish consumers (~5M motorists)</td><td>Direct beneficiaries of HD01FiU48 fuel tax cut May–Sep 2026</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal note</td></tr><tr><td>Ukrainian government</td><td>Benefits from HD03232 compensation commission + HD03231 aggression tribunal</td><td>HD03232+HD03231 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment">Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment">Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1086,13 +1086,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment">Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessme
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>E2026 impact of today's events</th><th>Probability of gain/loss</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Svantesson accountability risk (HD10442) threatens Finance Minister's credibility — key election asset</td><td>LOSS risk: Likely [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Dual-track strategy on HD01FiU48 may lose climate voters to MP/V; gains cost-of-living credibility</td><td>MIXED: net neutral</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Benefited from HD01FiU48 passage (aligned with voter base); no accountability exposure today</td><td>GAIN: Possible [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>MP/V</td><td>HD024082/092/098 counter-motions signal climate differentiation from S — potential voter gain</td><td>GAIN from S: Possible [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>KD/L</td><td>No major exposure; KD (Johan Britz) advancing wind power (positive)</td><td>STABLE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Forward Indicators
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Horizons</strong>: 72h / 1 week / 1 month / election (≥10 indicators required)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-01</td><td>Press coverage of HD01FiU48 vote in Expressen/Aftonbladet</td><td>Tabloid coverage confirms public visibility</td><td>[B2]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-02</td><td>Fuel station pump price changes visible (first published data)</td><td>Konkurrensverket / petroleum industry pricing</td><td>[B3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-03</td><td>Government response to HD10442 interpellation (Svantesson/minister team)</td><td>Official response filing in Riksdag — watch for delay tactics</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-04</td><td>S leadership statement clarifying dual-track on HD01FiU48</td><td>Press conference or social media — watch for messaging coherence</td><td>[B2]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29">1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29">1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29">1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-05</td><td>SCB consumer confidence data (if scheduled)</td><td>May reflect energy cost expectations</td><td>[C3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-06</td><td>Riksdag calendar — debate scheduling for HD10442-HD10446</td><td>Formal debate booking = escalation confirmed</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-07</td><td>Additional S interpellations filed (PIR-7 continuity indicator)</td><td>Watch for >2 new IPs from S → confirms coordinated campaign</td><td>[B2]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-08</td><td>C (Centerpartiet) public position clarification on HD01FiU48</td><td>Split within C on fuel vs. climate may emerge in press</td><td>[B3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22">1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22">1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22">1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-09</td><td>First fuel tax cut take-up data (Skatteverket administrative)</td><td>Administrative confirmation of effective reduction</td><td>[B2]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-10</td><td>Riksdag interpellation debate for HD10442 (formal answer from Svantesson)</td><td>Substance of Svantesson's response will reveal if court documentation is contested</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-11</td><td>HD01KU32/KU33 grundlag second-reading scheduling</td><td>Constitutional reform timeline — if not scheduled before summer recess, delays to 2026/27 Riksdag</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-12</td><td>Polling shifts: S rural vs. S urban (if YouGov/Novus release party sub-group data)</td><td>Tests whether HD01FiU48 Ja vote changed S rural support</td><td>[C3]</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09">Election Horizon (by 2026-09)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09">Election Horizon (by 2026-09)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09">Election Horizon (by 2026-09)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-13</td><td>General election result: S bloc vs. Government bloc seat count</td><td>Primary PIR-2 (coalition stability) resolution</td><td>[B3]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-14</td><td>Fuel tax sunset clause renewal decision (post-election)</td><td>Confirms whether temporary measure becomes permanent spending commitment</td><td>[B3]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-15</td><td>Grundlag Stage 2 vote in new Riksdag</td><td>Tests continuity of constitutional reform will</td><td>[B3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-16</td><td>Svantesson position (Finance Minister) post-election</td><td>HD10442 court documentation may affect political sustainability</td><td>[C3]</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-watch-linkage">PIR Watch Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-watch-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-watch-linkage">PIR Watch Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-watch-linkage"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1302,18 +1302,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-watch-linkage">PIR Watch Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Lead indicator</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1 (Fiscal stance)</td><td>FI-09 (fuel tax take-up), FI-14 (renewal)</td><td>1 month / election</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2 (Coalition stability)</td><td>FI-08 (C position), FI-13 (election)</td><td>1 week / election</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4 (Foreign policy)</td><td>(not triggered today — Ukraine framework is stable)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6 (Constitutional)</td><td>FI-11 (KU scheduling), FI-15 (Stage 2)</td><td>1 month / election</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7 (Campaign postures)</td><td>FI-04 (S messaging), FI-07 (new IPs), FI-16 (Svantesson)</td><td>72h / 1 week / election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-summary">Indicator Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-summary">Indicator Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Total indicators</strong>: 16 (exceeds minimum requirement of 10)
 <strong>Horizon coverage</strong>: 4/4 horizons represented (72h: 4, 1-week: 4, 1-month: 4, election: 4)
 <strong>Admiralty range</strong>: [A1] through [C3] — appropriate uncertainty gradient across time horizons</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SCN-ID</strong>: SCN-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: scenario-analysis.md template
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 mindmap
     root((Sweden April 2026&#x3C;br/>Scenario Space))
@@ -1325,8 +1325,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
             W1_Early["W1: Early Election&#x3C;br/>5% — Coalition collapse"]
             W2_EU["W2: EU Challenge&#x3C;br/>5% — Commission challenges fuel measure"]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45">Scenario 1: Coalition Consolidation (Probability: 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45">Scenario 1: Coalition Consolidation (Probability: 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: HD01FiU48 delivers electoral dividend for the governing coalition; Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100) becomes the positive narrative anchor; S accountability offensive fails to gain traction.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers confirming S1</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45">Scenario 1: Coalit
 <p><strong>Strategic implications for government</strong>: Double down on fiscal responsibility narrative; advance HD03240 (electricity system) as forward-looking policy; schedule HD10442 debate late to minimise exposure.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Based on inference from electoral context, not confirmed intelligence</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30">Scenario 2: Accountability Crisis (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30">Scenario 2: Accountability Crisis (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: S's coordinated accountability offensive succeeds; HD10442 forces Svantesson into publicly untenable position; Finance Committee activities become a pre-election liability.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers confirming S2</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30">Scenario 2: Accounta
 <p><strong>Strategic implications for opposition</strong>: Maintain consistent messaging; seek media partners for investigative coverage; consider linking to broader healthcare accountability narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — Probable; court documentation provides unusually strong evidentiary basis for this scenario</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15">Scenario 3: Climate Fracture (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15">Scenario 3: Climate Fracture (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: S's Ja vote on HD01FiU48 while simultaneously filing counter-motions erodes their climate credibility; MP and V gain at S's expense among climate-prioritising voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers confirming S3</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1377,17 +1377,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15">Scenario 3: Climate Fract
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Possible; dependent on media frame choices not yet determined</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5">Scenario 4: Wild Card — EU Challenge (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5">Scenario 4: Wild Card — EU Challenge (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: European Commission challenges HD03236/HD01FiU48 fuel tax reduction as incompatible with EU energy taxation directive or state aid rules.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers</strong>: Any Commission preliminary investigation notification; formal infringement proceedings</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [D4] — Remotely possible; based on general EU legal framework, no specific intelligence</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5">Scenario 5: Wild Card — Early Election (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5">Scenario 5: Wild Card — Early Election (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: Accountability pressure accumulates beyond manageable level; Kristersson government faces confidence vote; early election called.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers</strong>: HD10442 + additional accountability cases trigger combined confidence motion from S+V+MP; L or C defects from coalition</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [E5] — Remote; current parliamentary arithmetic makes this very unlikely before September 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 pie title Scenario Probabilities (Sums to 100%)
     "S1: Coalition Consolidation (45%)" : 45
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<
     "W1: Early Election (5%)" : 5
     "W2: EU Challenge (5%)" : 5</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators Per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators Per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1452,12 +1452,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators Per Scenario<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Svantesson clear response to HD10442</td><td>Parliamentary debate</td><td>2026-05-05+</td></tr><tr><td>S1</td><td>S polling stable or declining</td><td>Demoskop/SIFO</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-06</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>HD10442 debate scheduled before August</td><td>Speaker calendar</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-05</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>DN/SVT investigation on ätstörningsvård</td><td>Media</td><td>2026-05</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>MP/V gain on climate in polls</td><td>SIFO</td><td>2026-05 to 2026-07</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Climate NGO criticism of S</td><td>Public statements</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-05</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Commission notification on HD03236</td><td>EU Official Journal</td><td>2026-06+</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: political-risk-methodology.md (5-dimension register, L×I scoring)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-overview">Risk Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-overview">Risk Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#B71C1C', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Evening Analysis 2026-04-22
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-overview">Risk Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     EU Challenge on Fuel Tax Cut: [0.60, 0.25]
     Constitutional Reform Delay: [0.40, 0.35]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L (1–5)</th><th>I (1–5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Priority</th><th>Source</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson ministerial accountability crisis (HD10442 court ruling)</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-21)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>S dual-track strategy (Ja vote + opposition motion) alienates climate voters</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote + HD024082 (riksdagen.se)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-fiscal credibility gap widening pre-election</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HD024082/092/098 + HD01FiU48 enacted</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Budget deterioration (4.1 GSEK) affects fiscal credibility</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal note; World Bank GDP 0.82%</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Social dumpning becomes media escalation before election</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD10443 + HD10423 scheduled 2026-05-05</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission challenge to fuel tax cut compatibility</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU state aid rules; HD03236 fuel measure</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional reform (KU33 vilande) delayed in second reading</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD01KU33 first reading only</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture on vårproposition HD03100</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>CONTINGENCY</td><td>HD03100 — full coalition backing assumed</td><td>[C3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-cascading-chains">Risk Cascading Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-cascading-chains">Risk Cascading Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     R1["🔴 Svantesson HD10442&#x3C;br/>Accountability Risk&#x3C;br/>L=3, I=5, L×I=15"]
     R2["🔴 S Dual-Track&#x3C;br/>Climate Credibility&#x3C;br/>L=4, I=4, L×I=16"]
@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-cascading-chains">Risk Cascading Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style R5 fill:#F57F17,color:#FFFFFF
     style CRISIS fill:#C62828,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1623,13 +1623,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Base Rate</th><th>Updated P</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson faces significant parliamentary pressure from HD10442</td><td>45%</td><td><strong>65%</strong></td><td>Court documentation attached to IP — unusually strong evidentiary basis</td></tr><tr><td>S loses climate voters due to HD01FiU48 Ja vote</td><td>35%</td><td><strong>55%</strong></td><td>MP+V already signalling in motions; S base increasingly climate-conscious</td></tr><tr><td>Budget balance deteriorates further before June budget</td><td>40%</td><td><strong>60%</strong></td><td>Weak GDP growth trajectory + pre-election spending pressure</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443 social dumpning triggers media investigation</td><td>25%</td><td><strong>45%</strong></td><td>Pattern of multiple S interpellations on same theme is investigative journalism signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: political-swot-framework.md
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Cross-type synthesis — propositions, committee reports, interpellations, motions
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-overview">🎯 SWOT Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-overview">🎯 SWOT Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1B5E20', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'primaryBorderColor': '#C8E6C9', 'lineColor': '#546E7A', 'secondaryColor': '#0D47A1', 'tertiaryColor': '#37474F', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title SWOT — Sweden Parliament 2026-04-22 Evening Synthesis
@@ -1648,7 +1648,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--swot-overview">🎯 SWOT Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
     Election Year Budget Pressure: [0.35, 0.70]
     Pre-election Volatility: [0.20, 0.30]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Broad cross-party coalition enacted HD01FiU48 — demonstrates fiscal responsiveness to household cost pressures</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote record CE14CCEF: M+SD+S+KD voted Ja at riksdagen.se on 2026-04-22</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Coherent spring fiscal framework maintains surplus rule — HD03100 preserves fiscal discipline while providing household relief</td><td>HD03100 (riksdagen.se, Finansdepartementet, 2026-04-13) — surplus rule >0.33% GDP maintained</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden deepens Ukraine accountability commitment via two international frameworks — demonstrates rule-of-law solidarity</td><td>HD03232 + HD03231 (riksdagen.se, UU committee, 2026-04-16) — joined both compensation register and aggression tribunal</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Energy system modernisation advances with new electricity laws and wind revenue sharing</td><td>HD03240 + HD03239 (riksdagen.se, Klimat- och näringsdepartementet, 2026-04-14) — major policy advances</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional reform pipeline active: two grundlag first readings simultaneous</td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32 (riksdagen.se, KU committee) — rarely seen dual constitutional readings</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1736,7 +1736,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Climate-fiscal contradiction: fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) contradicts Sweden's stated carbon tax trajectory</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted vs Sweden's longstanding fossil fuel tax policy trajectory; MP+V+S filed counter-motions HD024082/092/098 citing climate harm (riksdagen.se)</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>S dual-track electoral strategy undermines policy coherence: voted for relief while opposing in motion</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote (Ja, S) + HD024082 opposition motion same week (riksdagen.se) — direct contradiction</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson ministerial accountability exposure: HD10442 cites court ruling contradicting her public statements</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-21, M. Kallifatides/S) — court upheld Region Stockholm, Svantesson's statements deemed incorrect</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr><tr><td>Budget deterioration of 4.1 GSEK in pre-election spending context risks medium-term fiscal credibility</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal impact note + Sweden GDP growth 2024 only 0.82% (World Bank)</td><td>[A1/B2]</td><td>Very likely</td></tr><tr><td>Social dumpning documented (HD10443) — municipalities illegally displacing vulnerable persons between jurisdictions reveals governance gap</td><td>HD10443 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-22, P. Björk/S) + related HD10423 already scheduled for answer 2026-05-05</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election fiscal package galvanises consumer confidence at critical 144-day-to-election moment</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; Sweden inflation dropping from 8.55% (2023) to 2.84% (2024) (World Bank) creates fiscal headroom</td><td>[A1/B2]</td><td>Likely</td></tr><tr><td>EU circular economy compliance via HD01MJU19 waste legislation positions Sweden as a leader in materials recovery</td><td>HD01MJU19 (riksdagen.se, MJU committee) — implements EU circular economy targets</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr><tr><td>Pre-emption rights debate (HD10445) opens housing segregation as electoral issue — S can position on urban justice</td><td>HD10445 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-22, M. Kallifatides/S) — cites SOU 2024:38; government shelved this policy</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Likely</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) resolves key barrier to onshore wind expansion — long-term energy security</td><td>HD03239 (riksdagen.se, Klimat- och näringsdepartementet, 2026-04-14) — municipal resident compensation rights</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threats">⚡ Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">⚡ Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1812,7 +1812,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threats">⚡ Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hre
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Coordinated S accountability offensive could force political crisis before election</td><td>HD10442+10443+10444+10445+10446 (riksdagen.se): 5 interpellations in 48 hours targeting Finance Minister and Civil Minister</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-fiscal gap could become primary S election attack vector if global energy prices normalise</td><td>HD024082/092/098 opposition motions (riksdagen.se) + Sweden commitment to Paris Agreement</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Likely</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal social dumping (HD10443) if unaddressed could generate media escalation pre-election</td><td>HD10443 + HD10423 (riksdagen.se) — pattern: multiple S interpellations on same theme signals investigative journalism likely</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Possible</td></tr><tr><td>4.1 GSEK budget deterioration in context of weak GDP growth risks credit agency scrutiny</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal note + World Bank Sweden GDP 2024: 0.82%, 2023: −0.20% — two consecutive near-zero years</td><td>[A1/B2]</td><td>Unlikely</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1835,13 +1835,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>External Opportunities</th><th>External Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Internal Strengths</strong></td><td>SO: Use cross-party fiscal coalition (HD01FiU48) to frame E2026 as government delivering household relief while investing in energy transition (HD03240+HD03239)</td><td>ST: Leverage Ukraine commitment (HD03232+HD03231) to shift media narrative from S accountability attacks to foreign policy strength</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Internal Weaknesses</strong></td><td>WO: Address S dual-track contradiction by forcing S to explain their simultaneous Ja vote and opposition motion</td><td>WT: Pre-empt Svantesson accountability crisis (HD10442) with proactive ministerial statement before IP debate is scheduled</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: political-threat-framework.md (Political Threat Taxonomy, attack tree)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: Elevated | <strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview">Political Threat Taxonomy Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview">Political Threat Taxonomy Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#C62828', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'lineColor': '#90CAF9'}}}%%
 mindmap
     root((Sweden Political&#x3C;br/>Threat Landscape&#x3C;br/>2026-04-22))
@@ -1867,7 +1867,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview">Political Threat Taxonomy Overvie
                 S+V+MP counter-motion coalition
                 Coordinated accountability offensive</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-analysis">Attack Tree Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-analysis">Attack Tree Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["Opposition Goal: Force Government Accountability Crisis&#x3C;br/>Before September 2026 Election"]
 
@@ -1902,7 +1902,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-analysis">Attack Tree Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style A2a fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF
     style A3a fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain">Parliamentary Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain">Parliamentary Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1959,7 +1959,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain">Parliamentary Accountability Chai
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Phase</th><th>Action</th><th>Actor</th><th>Status</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Evidence gathering</td><td>Identify Svantesson statements on atstorningsvard</td><td>S research</td><td>Complete</td><td>HD10442 references</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Obtain court ruling vindicating Region Stockholm</td><td>Legal research</td><td>Complete</td><td>HD10442 cites court case</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>File interpellation HD10442 with court documentation</td><td>Markus Kallifatides (S)</td><td><strong>Complete</strong> 2026-04-21</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Response forcing</td><td>Force parliamentary debate</td><td>Speaker scheduling</td><td>Pending (post-May 5)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Media escalation</td><td>Coverage of false statements</td><td>Swedish press</td><td>Pending</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral use</td><td>S uses answer in campaign materials</td><td>S party</td><td>Pending (election day)</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Procedure</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-001</td><td>Accountability</td><td>Court-documented accountability</td><td>File IP with court ruling as evidence — higher evidentiary standard than typical IP</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se)</td></tr><tr><td>S-002</td><td>Dual-track positioning</td><td>Simultaneous support and opposition</td><td>Vote for measure in chamber while filing counter-motion</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote + HD024082</td></tr><tr><td>S-003</td><td>Coordinated offensive</td><td>Multi-minister targeting</td><td>File 5 IPs in 48 hours targeting 2 ministers</td><td>HD10442-HD10446</td></tr><tr><td>SD-001</td><td>Coalition support</td><td>Key vote solidarity</td><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48 alongside government</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote records</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-probability-assessment">Threat Probability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-probability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-probability-assessment">Threat Probability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-probability-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2046,29 +2046,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-probability-assessment">Threat Probability Assessment<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Current State</th><th>Probability</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S successfully damages Svantesson in HD10442 IP debate</td><td>IP scheduled, court docs strong</td><td>Likely [B2] 65%</td><td>Post 2026-05-05</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S climate voters defect to MP/V due to HD01FiU48 Ja vote</td><td>Counter-motions + Ja vote contradiction</td><td>Possible [B3] 40%</td><td>By election 2026-09-13</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Social dumpning (HD10443) generates media investigation</td><td>Two S IPs on same theme</td><td>Possible [B3] 35%</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-05</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Government fiscal credibility challenged before June budget</td><td>4.1 GSEK + weak GDP</td><td>Unlikely [D4] 20%</td><td>2026-05 to 2026-06</td><td>[D4]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27">HD01CU27<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01CU27
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande CU27 — Civilutskottet bostadsrätt/hyresrätt reform
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande CU27 — Civilutskottet bostadsrätt/hyresrätt reform. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu28">HD01CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01CU28
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande CU28 — Civilutskottet bostadsrättslagen ändring
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande CU28 — Civilutskottet bostadsrättslagen ändring. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48
 <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (committee report — FiU)
 <strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 — bränsle och drivmedelsavgifter + energistöd
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <strong>Enacted</strong>: 2026-04-22 16:29 CET
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se enacted record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01FiU48 is the committee report on the government's extra ändringsbudget for 2026 addressing fuel and energy costs. The proposition HD03236 was the originating government bill. FiU voted to adopt the measure, and it was enacted by the chamber at 16:29 on 2026-04-22.</p>
 <p><strong>Key provisions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2085,7 +2085,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>Total budget impact: approximately 4.1 GSEK net</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-vote-record">Vote Record<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-record"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vote-record">Vote Record<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-record"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2139,35 +2139,35 @@ <h2 id="rm-vote-record">Vote Record<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Seats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Ja</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Ja</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>Ja</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Ja</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>Nej/Avstår</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Nej</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Nej</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Mixed</td><td>24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total Ja</strong>: ~267 seats (estimated). Majority: 175. Passed with significant supermajority.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-2">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-2">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: W (Warning) — Enacted measure immediately affects national budget and sets political precedent for cross-bloc cooperation.</p>
 <p><strong>Key analytical point</strong>: S participation was mathematically necessary for supermajority. S's 107 Ja votes added to M+SD+KD (160) = 267. Without S, government coalition alone at 160 would have passed with only bare majority (160 > 175 is false — actually 160 &#x3C; 175). S's votes were therefore pivotal to the political optics of broad consensus, even if legally the government had enough with SD included to reach 176 (M+SD+KD = 160 &#x3C; 175... actually M+SD+KD+L = 176 > 175). Clarification: The government bloc (M+SD+KD+L = 176) had enough without S. S's Ja vote was not mathematically required but was politically significant as a cross-bloc endorsement.</p>
 <p><strong>Corrected analysis</strong>: Government bloc (176) > 175 threshold. S participation was <strong>politically voluntary</strong> — not mathematically necessary. This makes S's decision MORE significant: they had the freedom to abstain or vote Nej, but chose Ja.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for vote record; [B2] for political significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU32
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande KU32 — Grundlagsändring medietillgänglighet (Stage 1)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande KU32 — Grundlagsändring medietillgänglighet (Stage 1). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-3">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-3">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU33
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande KU33 — Grundlagsändring husrannsakan insyn (Stage 1)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande KU33 — Grundlagsändring husrannsakan insyn (Stage 1). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-4">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-4">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024082
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion
 <strong>Title</strong>: Följdmotion mot HD03236/HD01FiU48 — klimat och energiomställning
@@ -2176,13 +2176,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <strong>Committee referral</strong>: FiU / MJU (likely)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se motion record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>HD024082 is one of three parallel climate counter-motions filed by S, V, and MP respectively against the fuel tax cut measure (HD03236/HD01FiU48). S filed HD024082 while simultaneously voting Ja on HD01FiU48 in the chamber — creating the "dual-track contradiction" that is a central analytical finding.</p>
 <p><strong>S's position in this motion</strong>: Argues that the fuel tax cut is environmentally regressive and contrary to Sweden's climate commitments. Proposes alternative energy transition measures.</p>
 <p><strong>V's motion (HD024092)</strong>: Similar climate critique from left perspective.
 <strong>MP's motion (HD024098)</strong>: Green party opposition to fossil fuel subsidies.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis">Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis">Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis">Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis<
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>S action</th><th>Date</th><th>Parliament record</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Filed HD024082 opposing fuel cut</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48 enacting fuel cut</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>These two acts occurred on the same calendar day.</strong> This is documented in Riksdag records and cannot be contested.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-5">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-5">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — HD024082 is an indicator of S's internal strategic tensions between climate/environmental wing and rural/cost-of-living electoral bloc.</p>
 <p><strong>Long-term significance</strong>: The motion will be processed in committee (likely rejected with government majority). However, it will remain in the parliamentary record permanently, available for:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2216,62 +2216,62 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-5">Intelligence Significance<a class="" ari
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document facts; [B2] for strategic significance.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024090">HD024090<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024090"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024090
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion 2024/90 — Klimat och energiomställning (relaterad)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion 2024/90 — Klimat och energiomställning (relaterad). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-6">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-6">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024092">HD024092<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024092"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024092
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion V — Klimatmotion mot HD03236 (parallell till HD024082)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion V — Klimatmotion mot HD03236 (parallell till HD024082). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-7">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-7">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024095">HD024095<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024095"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024095
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion 2024/95 — Energipolitik
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion 2024/95 — Energipolitik. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-8">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-8">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024097">HD024097<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024097"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024097
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion 2024/97 — Energi och klimat
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion 2024/97 — Energi och klimat. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-9">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-9">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-9"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024098">HD024098<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024098"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024098
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion MP — Miljöpartiet klimatmotion mot HD03236
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion MP — Miljöpartiet klimatmotion mot HD03236. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-10">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-10">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100
 <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition (Vårproposition 2026)
 <strong>Title</strong>: 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition
@@ -2279,7 +2279,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15 (approximate — vårproposition timing)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03100 is the 2026 Economic Spring Budget (Vårproposition). As a pre-election document, it sets the government's fiscal framework and public spending priorities for the upcoming election campaign period. Filed approximately 5 months before the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Key elements</strong> (synthesised from propositions sibling folder):</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2290,13 +2290,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Ukraine support framework (links to HD03232, HD03231)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment">Pre-Election Fiscal Manifesto Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment">Pre-Election Fiscal Manifesto Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Vårproposition is a structural policy statement that anchors fiscal expectations for election campaign period.</p>
 <p><strong>Key intelligence value</strong>:
 The Vårproposition is the government's last major economic document before the election. It is effectively a political manifesto dressed as a budget document. The opposition (S) will use it as a contrast document in campaign messaging.</p>
 <p><strong>Analytical gap</strong>: Full text of HD03100 was not directly retrieved in this cycle. Summary derived from propositions sibling folder synthesis-summary.md. Marked as [B2] for derived assessment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Locks in the fiscal baseline that any successor government inherits</li>
 <li>The 4.1 GSEK HD01FiU48 appropriation now embedded in this baseline</li>
@@ -2304,62 +2304,62 @@ <h2 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B2] for content assessment (derived from sibling folder).</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03232">HD03232<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03232
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03232 — Sverige ansluter sig till ukrainskt skadeståndsregister
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03232 — Sverige ansluter sig till ukrainskt skadeståndsregister. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-11">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-11">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-11"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03236
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03236 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (source for HD01FiU48)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03236 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (source for HD01FiU48). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-12">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-12">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-12"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03239">HD03239<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03239"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03239
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03239 — Stärkt försörjningsberedskap inom energiområdet
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03239 — Stärkt försörjningsberedskap inom energiområdet. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-13">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-13">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-13"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03240
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03240 — Nya elsystemlagar och energisäkerhetsramverk
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03240 — Nya elsystemlagar och energisäkerhetsramverk. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-14">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-14">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-14"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd0399">HD0399<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd0399"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD0399
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD0399 — Vårändringbudget 2026
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD0399 — Vårändringbudget 2026. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-15">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-15">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-15"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10442">HD10442<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10442
 <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation till statsråd om ätstörningar och ekonomisk prioritering
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10442">HD10442<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Svantesson (Finance), possibly also Health Minister
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se interpellation record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10442 is an interpellation to a government minister (Svantesson or Health Ministry) regarding eating disorders and fiscal prioritisation. The filing MP obtained court documentation as evidence — this elevates the interpellation from typical accountability question to documented legal record.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this matters</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>This creates campaign material: if Svantesson's answer is inadequate, S has documented evidence of ministerial failure on health/welfare priorities</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parliamentary-process">Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-process"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parliamentary-process">Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-process"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2410,62 +2410,62 @@ <h2 id="rm-parliamentary-process">Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Status</th><th>Expected timing</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Filed</td><td>2026-04-21 ✅</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Admitted by Riksdag</td><td>Likely (standard IPs rarely rejected)</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td></tr><tr><td>Minister response scheduling</td><td>Pending</td><td>1–3 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Formal chamber debate</td><td>Pending</td><td>2–4 weeks</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-16">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-16">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-16"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: W (Warning) — The court documentation makes this interpellation uniquely persistent. Unlike most IPs that are answered perfunctorily, HD10442 creates a documented record that will outlast the parliamentary session.</p>
 <p><strong>Party accountability value for S</strong>: This is the highest-quality document in the interpellation cluster. The other 4 (HD10443-HD10446) are standard accountability questions. HD10442 with court documentation is qualitatively different.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document/filing facts; [B2] for strategic significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10443">HD10443<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10443
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10443 — Social dumpning (Svantesson)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10443 — Social dumpning (Svantesson). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-17">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-17">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-17"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10444">HD10444<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10444
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgifter bostadssektor
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgifter bostadssektor. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-18">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-18">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-18"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10445">HD10445<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10445
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10445 — Energikostnader hushåll
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10445 — Energikostnader hushåll. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-19">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-19">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-19"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10446">HD10446<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10446
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10446 — Uppföljning socialtjänst
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10446 — Uppföljning socialtjänst. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-20">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-20">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md + Kent Scale WEP
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days until election</strong>: ~144 days (election estimated September 2026)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-context">Seat Projection Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-context">Seat Projection Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current Riksdag composition</strong> (349 seats):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Government (Tidökoalitionen): M + SD + KD + L ≈ 176 seats (bare majority)</li>
@@ -2483,8 +2483,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-context">Seat Projection Context<a class="" aria-hidd
     "MP (Miljöpartiet)" : 18
     "C (Centerpartiet)" : 24</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis">Today's Electoral Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis">Today's Electoral Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2538,40 +2538,40 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Vote</th><th>Electoral gain/loss</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Ja</td><td>Delivers promise to rural voters; reinforces economic competence narrative</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Ja</td><td>Core voter base (rural, transport-dependent) — HIGH benefit</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>Ja</td><td>Consistent with value-conservative + rural profile</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>Nej (likely)</td><td>Maintains environmental credibility with urban voter base</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Ja</td><td>CONTRADICTED by HD024082 counter-motion — dual-track risk</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Nej</td><td>Consistent with climate/urban profile</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Nej</td><td>Consistent with climate profile</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Mixed</td><td>Split between rural (pro) and liberal (con) wings — no clear read</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: It is <strong>Likely</strong> [60–70%] that S's Ja vote will improve their polling numbers among rural and transport-dependent voters in western and northern Sweden in Q3 2026. It is <strong>Roughly even</strong> [45–55%] that the counter-motion HD024082 will be used effectively against S in the election campaign.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension">HD10442-HD10446 — Interpellation Offensive (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension">HD10442-HD10446 — Interpellation Offensive (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>The S accountability offensive targeting Svantesson (Finance), housing minister, and social minister is a classic pre-election positioning move. The eating disorder court documentation in HD10442 demonstrates opposition research capacity.</p>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: It is <strong>Very likely</strong> [75–90%] that these interpellations will generate campaign material for S. The court documentation in HD10442 means the issue cannot be dismissed as political theatre.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026">Coalition Scenario Analysis (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority">Scenario A: Government coalition wins (Tidökoalitionen majority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026">Coalition Scenario Analysis (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority">Scenario A: Government coalition wins (Tidökoalitionen majority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~35% (based on current trends)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires SD to maintain ~20% polling</li>
 <li>M to consolidate centre-right vote share</li>
 <li>Key indicator: Fuel tax cut voter credit (→ SD/M benefit)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support">Scenario B: S-led government with V+MP support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support">Scenario B: S-led government with V+MP support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~40% (slight S polling advantage)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>S at ~32% in most polls (post-vårproposition period)</li>
 <li>V+MP above 4% threshold both needed</li>
 <li>Key risk: S dual-track strategy may alienate environmental progressive flank</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure">Scenario C: Hung parliament / Grand coalition pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure">Scenario C: Hung parliament / Grand coalition pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~20%</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Neither bloc at 175+</li>
 <li>C acting as kingmaker from centre</li>
 <li>Constitutional reform (HD01KU32/KU33) could influence rules for minority government</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september">Scenario D: Snap election before September<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september">Scenario D: Snap election before September<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~5%</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Only if government loses confidence vote on budgetary grounds</li>
 <li>HD01FiU48 passage with cross-party majority actually REDUCES this risk</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days">Election Countdown Indicators (144 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days">Election Countdown Indicators (144 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2609,13 +2609,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days">Election Countdown Indicators
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Current Status</th><th>Expected development</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S polling position</td><td>~32%</td><td>Likely stable if fuel tax cut credit holds</td></tr><tr><td>SD polling position</td><td>~19-21%</td><td>Dependent on migration narrative + fuel cut credit</td></tr><tr><td>Election date confirmation</td><td>Not formally announced</td><td>Expected Q1 2026 formal call</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag reform impact</td><td>Stage 1 (KU32/33)</td><td>Too late for 2026 election cycle effect</td></tr><tr><td>Budget baseline</td><td>4.1 GSEK deterioration</td><td>May require austerity framing after election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Coalition Mathematics
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Key data</strong>: HD01FiU48 vote record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag">Current Seat Distribution (2025/26 Riksdag)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag">Current Seat Distribution (2025/26 Riksdag)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag">Current Seat Distribution (
 <p><strong>Government majority</strong>: M+SD+KD+L = 176 seats (≥175 needed)
 <strong>Opposition</strong>: S+V+MP+C = 173 seats</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis">HD01FiU48 Vote Record — Pivotal Coalition Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis">HD01FiU48 Vote Record — Pivotal Coalition Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2741,7 +2741,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis">HD01FiU48 Vote Rec
 <strong>Nej/Avstår</strong>: ~82 seats (L+V+MP+ some C)</p>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: The government bloc (M+SD+KD+L = 176) already exceeded the 175-seat majority threshold without S's votes. S's participation was therefore <strong>politically voluntary, not mathematically necessary</strong>. Without L (if L voted Nej), government would have been M+SD+KD = 160 — then S's participation would be necessary. As stated, S had full freedom to oppose; their deliberate Ja vote reflects electoral calculation, not parliamentary obligation. The resulting ~267-seat supermajority amplifies the political signal: S chose to cross the aisle.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation">Sainte-Laguë Scenario Table (for reference — election 2026 simulation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation">Sainte-Laguë Scenario Table (for reference — election 2026 simulation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation"></a></h3>
 <p>Using approximate current poll averages (April 2026):</p>
 
 
@@ -2807,7 +2807,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation"
 <li>S + C + V + MP = 181 = majority → viable S-led government with C support</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     SBL["S-bloc (S+V+MP)&#x3C;br/>~153 seats (simulated)&#x3C;br/>INSUFFICIENT alone"]
@@ -2825,7 +2825,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" ari
     style MAJ1 fill:#8B0000,color:#FFFFFF
     style MAJ2 fill:#003580,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-mathematical-finding">Key Mathematical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-mathematical-finding"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-mathematical-finding">Key Mathematical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-mathematical-finding"></a></h3>
 <p>The HD01FiU48 cross-party majority (M+SD+KD+S) is <strong>constitutionally and electorally significant</strong> because:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>It demonstrates S can cooperate on budget issues across the bloc divide</li>
@@ -2834,12 +2834,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-mathematical-finding">Key Mathematical Finding<a class="" aria-hi
 </ol>
 <p><strong>WEP</strong>: It is <strong>Unlikely</strong> [15–25%] that L would formally withdraw from the government coalition over this single vote. However, it is <strong>Likely</strong> [60–70%] that L will emphasise its Nej vote in campaign materials as environmental credibility marker.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Voter Segmentation
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut">Segment Impact Matrix — HD01FiU48 (Fuel Tax Cut)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut">Segment Impact Matrix — HD01FiU48 (Fuel Tax Cut)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2901,7 +2901,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut">Segment Impact Matrix
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size est.</th><th>Impact of HD01FiU48</th><th>Likely primary beneficiary party</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural households (>50km from city)</td><td>~15% of electorate</td><td>HIGH — direct fuel cost savings</td><td>SD, M, S (rural)</td></tr><tr><td>Commuters >30km (car-dependent)</td><td>~20%</td><td>HIGH — daily saving</td><td>SD, M</td></tr><tr><td>Urban non-car households</td><td>~25%</td><td>LOW — marginal benefit</td><td>V, MP, L (urban)</td></tr><tr><td>Small businesses (transport)</td><td>~5%</td><td>HIGH — operational cost relief</td><td>M, KD</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-concerned voters</td><td>~15%</td><td>NEGATIVE — fossil fuel subsidy</td><td>MP, V, C (green wing)</td></tr><tr><td>Low-income households (fuel-dependent)</td><td>~10%</td><td>HIGH — regressive relief actually progressive for this group</td><td>S, SD</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural sector</td><td>~2%</td><td>HIGH — diesel relief applies</td><td>SD, C, M</td></tr><tr><td>Pensioners (rural, fixed income)</td><td>~8%</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>SD, KD, S</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-geographic-segmentation">Geographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-geographic-segmentation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-geographic-segmentation">Geographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-geographic-segmentation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#006AA7', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     N["Northern Sweden&#x3C;br/>Norrland&#x3C;br/>HIGH fuel dependency&#x3C;br/>S+SD strongholds&#x3C;br/>Clear HD01FiU48 benefit"]
@@ -2917,7 +2917,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-geographic-segmentation">Geographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidd
     style E fill:#0288D1,color:#FFFFFF
     style S fill:#FFD700,color:#000000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact">Interpellation Offensive — Voter Segment Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact">Interpellation Offensive — Voter Segment Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2961,7 +2961,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact">Interpellation Offens
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>IP (dok_id)</th><th>Issue</th><th>Target segment</th><th>S positioning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10442 (eating disorders + Svantesson)</td><td>Health system / fiscal priority</td><td>Middle-class families, women voters</td><td>"We hold government accountable on welfare"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443 (social dumping)</td><td>Labour market</td><td>Union households, LO-affiliated voters</td><td>"We protect Swedish workers"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444 (housing waiting times)</td><td>Young households</td><td>Urban young voters</td><td>"Government has failed on housing"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445 (energy costs)</td><td>Energy transition</td><td>Rural, pensioners</td><td>"We will ensure affordable energy"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10446 (follow-up unknown)</td><td>—</td><td>Broad</td><td>Accountability continuity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-segmentation-finding">Key Segmentation Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segmentation-finding"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-segmentation-finding">Key Segmentation Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segmentation-finding"></a></h3>
 <p>The critical voter segment is <strong>rural S-leaning voters</strong> (traditional social democrat base that has drifted to SD). Today's events create a complex picture for this group:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 Ja vote from S = direct benefit signal</li>
@@ -2970,16 +2970,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-segmentation-finding">Key Segmentation Finding<a class="" aria-hi
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net assessment</strong>: The fuel cut Ja vote is likely more electorally legible to this segment than the technical counter-motion. S has calculated correctly that the visible action (Ja vote) outweighs the insider opposition (committee motion). <strong>Likelihood this segment returns to S</strong>: Unlikely to Very Unlikely without additional signal; HD01FiU48 Ja vote is necessary but not sufficient. Admiralty: [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: comparative-international.md template
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Comparator set</strong>: Norway, Finland, Germany (Nordic + EU minimum requirement)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Norway (NO), Finland (FI), Germany (DE) — all Nordic/EU neighbours facing similar energy policy and fiscal dilemmas in 2025–2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context">Comparative Analysis: Fuel Tax Policy (HD01FiU48 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context">Comparative Analysis: Fuel Tax Policy (HD01FiU48 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     SWE["Sweden (SE)&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48 enacted 2026-04-22&#x3C;br/>Fuel tax cut 82 öre/liter&#x3C;br/>Budget impact: -4.1 GSEK"]
@@ -2996,7 +2996,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context">Comparative A
     style FIN fill:#003580,color:#FFFFFF
     style GER fill:#000000,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table">Jurisdiction Comparison Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table">Jurisdiction Comparison Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3044,18 +3044,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table">Jurisdiction Comparison Table<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Measure</th><th>Duration</th><th>Fiscal Cost</th><th>Political Outcome</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden 2026</td><td>HD01FiU48 — fuel tax cut 82 öre/l petrol</td><td>May–Sep 2026 (5 months)</td><td>4.1 GSEK</td><td>Cross-party adoption; S votes Ja</td><td>[A1] riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Norway 2022–23</td><td>Temporary petrol tax reduction</td><td>~12 months</td><td>~10 BNOK</td><td>Reversed 2024; minor electoral impact</td><td>[B2] SSB/Government reports</td></tr><tr><td>Finland 2022</td><td>Temporary fuel excise cut</td><td>6 months</td><td>~500 MEUR</td><td>Criticised by climate council; not renewed</td><td>[B2] Finnish gov. sources</td></tr><tr><td>Germany 2022</td><td>Tankrabatt fuel subsidy</td><td>3 months (Jun–Aug 2022)</td><td>~3.15 BEUR</td><td>Limited consumer impact; SPD-Greens coalition friction</td><td>[B2] Bundesministerium der Finanzen</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lesson from Norway</strong>: Norway's 2022–23 fuel tax reduction was ~2.5× larger than Sweden's (relative to GDP) and was reversed when energy prices normalised. Swedish policymakers should plan explicit sunset conditions beyond the stated May–September 2026 window to avoid politically painful renewal discussions in an election year.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson from Finland</strong>: The Finnish Climate Council's formal criticism created lasting narrative damage on climate credibility even though the measure was temporary. S filing counter-motions (HD024082/092/098) serves the same function domestically — creating a permanent record of opposition for campaign use.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson from Germany</strong>: Germany's Tankrabatt had limited consumer pass-through (fuel stations kept much of the benefit). Swedish policymakers have not publicly addressed pass-through risk for HD01FiU48. This is an EEI gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific factors not present in comparators</strong>: Sweden has an election in 5 months; none of the comparators faced election-year timing. This amplifies both the political benefit (electoral optics) and the political risk (being held accountable if benefits are not felt by voters).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Historical Parallels
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009">Precedent 1: Cross-Bloc Fiscal Emergency Measures (2008–2009)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009">Precedent 1: Cross-Bloc Fiscal Emergency Measures (2008–2009)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: During the global financial crisis (2008–2009), Sweden's centre-right Alliansregering passed several emergency fiscal measures with tacit S support in key Riksdag votes to stabilise the economy ahead of the 2010 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity to HD01FiU48</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3066,7 +3066,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009">Precedent
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: In 2008–09 the external shock (global crisis) provided cover for cross-party cooperation. In 2026, the "external shock" justification is weaker — energy prices have moderated from 2022 peaks. This makes the cross-party majority more politically conscious and therefore more strategically significant.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — based on public records of 2008–09 Riksdag proceedings; structural comparison drawn by analyst.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022">Precedent 2: S Dual-Track Strategy — The LAS Compromise (2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022">Precedent 2: S Dual-Track Strategy — The LAS Compromise (2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: In 2022, S simultaneously supported LAS (lagen om anställningsskydd) reform as part of the Tidö negotiations while the S party apparatus formally opposed the reform trajectory through affiliated union lobbying. This created a similar dual-track pattern.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity to HD024082 + HD01FiU48 Ja vote</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3077,12 +3077,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022">Precedent
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: The LAS dual-track was between parliament (formal vote) and union structures (informal influence). The 2026 dual-track is entirely within parliament (committee motion vs. chamber vote) — making the contradiction more visible in Riksdag records.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2] — LAS compromise is extensively documented in Swedish parliamentary record.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history">Precedent 3: Fuel Tax Reduction Reversal Risk — Swedish Fuel Tax History<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history">Precedent 3: Fuel Tax Reduction Reversal Risk — Swedish Fuel Tax History<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: Sweden introduced the current fuel tax framework under Alliansen 2011–2012. A temporary fuel duty freeze in 2014–2015 was later partially reversed. The pattern of temporary measures becoming permanent political commitments is documented.</p>
 <p><strong>Relevance to HD01FiU48</strong>: The May–September 2026 sunset clause for the fuel tax cut will face political pressure to extend post-election, regardless of which party forms government. This is a structural fiscal risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — based on Riksdag legislative record (public).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014">Precedent 4: Interpellation Offensive as Pre-Election Signal (2013–2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014">Precedent 4: Interpellation Offensive as Pre-Election Signal (2013–2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: S filed a similar concentrated interpellation campaign in 2013–2014 targeting the Alliansregering in the months before the 2014 election, including specific accountability questions about fiscal priorities and social spending. S won the 2014 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3093,7 +3093,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014"
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: In 2013–14, S had a single coherent message. In 2026, S's simultaneous Ja vote on fuel tax cut creates message complexity — the opposition wants accountability AND credit for relief. The dual-track makes the narrative more complex than 2013–14.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2] — 2013–14 interpellation record is public; electoral analysis draws on published research.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-pattern-summary">Historical Pattern Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-pattern-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-pattern-summary">Historical Pattern Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-pattern-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 timeline
     title Swedish Parliamentary Historical Parallels
@@ -3111,12 +3111,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-pattern-summary">Historical Pattern Summary<a class="" ari
               : 2026 election outcome TBD</pre>
 <p><strong>Analyst Note</strong>: The 2022 precedent (S LAS dual-track → election defeat) is the most structurally similar to today's pattern. Whether the outcome repeats depends on whether S can disambiguate the message before September 2026. Admiralty: [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Implementation Feasibility
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3180,8 +3180,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Measure</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Legal basis</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th><th>Pass-through risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut 82 öre/liter petrol</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Enacted 2026-04-22</td><td>May–Sep 2026</td><td>LOW — legally enacted</td><td>MEDIUM (retail fuel pricing)</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cut diesel</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Same</td><td>May–Sep 2026</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support (households)</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Same</td><td>Delivery via Energimyndigheten</td><td>MEDIUM — administrative</td><td>LOW (direct payments)</td></tr><tr><td>Vårproposition fiscal framework</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Cabinet approved</td><td>Budget 2027 process</td><td>LOW — framework document</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability (Hague)</td><td>HD03232+HD03231</td><td>International treaty</td><td>Multi-year</td><td>LOW — treaty ratification</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag reform Stage 1</td><td>HD01KU32+HD01KU33</td><td>Two-stage constitutional</td><td>Elections required</td><td>HIGH — two-Riksdag rule</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-delivery-risk-assessment">Delivery Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-delivery-risk-assessment">Delivery Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal status</strong>: ENACTED 2026-04-22 — legally effective. No remaining approval hurdles.</p>
 <p><strong>Delivery pathway</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -3191,16 +3191,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut<a class="" aria-h
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Key risk</strong>: Fuel station pass-through. Evidence from Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt showed ~30% of the subsidy was not passed through to consumers. Swedish Competition Authority (Konkurrensverket) monitoring would be needed to ensure pass-through.</p>
 <p><strong>WEP on effective delivery</strong>: It is <strong>Likely</strong> [60–70%] that fuel stations will pass through at least 70% of the reduction. It is <strong>Unlikely</strong> [20–30%] that the full 82 öre/liter reduction will be consistently visible at the pump.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03100--vårproposition">HD03100 — Vårproposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100--vårproposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03100--vårproposition">HD03100 — Vårproposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100--vårproposition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal status</strong>: Government bill — now in Riksdag budget committee process.</p>
 <p><strong>Delivery pathway</strong>: Standard budget cycle. Vårproposition informs Budget 2027 (höstpropostion). No legislative risk at this stage.</p>
 <p><strong>Key risk</strong>: Post-election government may revise HD03100 framework. Pre-election budget commitments are not binding on successor governments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform">HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — Grundlag Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform">HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — Grundlag Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal status</strong>: Stage 1 (first-reading) — 2 of 2 required Riksdag decisions needed.</p>
 <p><strong>Delivery pathway</strong>: Must pass second reading after intervening election (September 2026). Only effective if same parties support it after election.</p>
 <p><strong>Key risk</strong>: HIGH — constitutional reform requires continuity of political will across elections. If September 2026 election changes Riksdag composition significantly, reform may stall.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-administrative-capacity-assessment">Administrative Capacity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-capacity-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-administrative-capacity-assessment">Administrative Capacity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-capacity-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3233,17 +3233,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-administrative-capacity-assessment">Administrative Capacity Assessmen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Implementing body</th><th>Measure</th><th>Capacity status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Skatteverket</td><td>Fuel tax cut</td><td>HIGH — routine tax rate change, well-within administrative capacity</td></tr><tr><td>Energimyndigheten</td><td>Energy support</td><td>MEDIUM — depends on distribution mechanism design</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank</td><td>Macro monitoring</td><td>Ongoing — no new administrative requirement</td></tr><tr><td>Konkurrensverket</td><td>Pass-through monitoring</td><td>LOW — not formally mandated for this measure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-summary">Feasibility Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-summary">Feasibility Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HD01FiU48 is administratively straightforward</strong> — the primary risk is consumer pass-through. <strong>Grundlag reform is feasible but election-dependent</strong> — high political risk despite legal clarity. <strong>Vårproposition is sound framework</strong> but pre-election in nature.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty overall</strong>: [A1] for legal status, [B3] for effective delivery confidence.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ACH matrix + Red Team challenge
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix">Competing Hypotheses (ACH Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support">Hypothesis H1: S's HD01FiU48 Ja Vote was Genuine Policy Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix">Competing Hypotheses (ACH Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support">Hypothesis H1: S's HD01FiU48 Ja Vote was Genuine Policy Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The Socialdemokraterna voted for HD01FiU48 because they genuinely believe fuel tax relief is the right policy response to high energy costs — not as a purely electoral calculation.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H1</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3259,7 +3259,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support">Hypoth
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH judgment</strong>: H1 is UNLIKELY. The simultaneous evidence of both opposition motion and Ja vote in same party makes genuine policy conviction implausible. Admiry: [B2].</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated">Hypothesis H2: S Accountability Offensive is Opportunistic, Not Strategically Coordinated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated">Hypothesis H2: S Accountability Offensive is Opportunistic, Not Strategically Coordinated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 5 interpellations in 48 hours are not a coordinated strategy but individually motivated by specific constituency or committee interests.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H2</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3275,7 +3275,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strateg
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH judgment</strong>: H2 is UNLIKELY. Coordination is the more parsimonious explanation. Admiralty: [B2].</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk">Hypothesis H3: HD01FiU48 Budget Deterioration is Fiscally Manageable Without Election-Year Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk">Hypothesis H3: HD01FiU48 Budget Deterioration is Fiscally Manageable Without Election-Year Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 4.1 GSEK budget deterioration from HD01FiU48 is easily absorbed within Sweden's fiscal framework and poses no meaningful election-year risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H3</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-w
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH judgment</strong>: H3 is POSSIBLE but requires monitoring. The fiscal framework is robust; the risk is political not structural. Admiralty: [B3].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Red Team position</strong>: The mainstream analysis overestimates the significance of S's dual-track strategy. From a voter perspective, most Swedish citizens do not follow parliamentary procedural details (committee motions vs. chamber votes). S will simply claim credit for the relief in the election campaign, and voters will not know about the counter-motion.</p>
 <p><strong>Red Team argument</strong>: The analytical conclusion that S faces a "contradiction" is an insider view. Outside Parliament, S messaging will simply be "we made sure you got the fuel tax cut." The motion is a niche policy insider document; the vote record is the public-facing fact.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment of Red Team challenge</strong>: PARTIALLY VALID. The dual-track contradiction matters primarily for:
@@ -3301,7 +3301,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 (c) Political analysts
 It does NOT matter for the median voter unfamiliar with committee motions. This narrows the risk from S's perspective. Revised confidence on electoral damage risk: from HIGH to MEDIUM. [B2→C3 for general voter impact]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses">Rejected Alternative Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses">Rejected Alternative Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3325,12 +3325,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses">Rejected Alternative Hypotheses<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Why Rejected</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S filed counter-motions to keep HD024082/092/098 in committee, not as public opposition</td><td>Motions are public record; cannot be "hidden" in committee — filed against riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson proactively prepared response to HD10442 before filing</td><td>IP was filed 2026-04-21; debate not yet scheduled — no public response available [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD voted Ja on HD01FiU48 under government pressure rather than genuine support</td><td>SD consistently supports fuel cost relief; no evidence of coercion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: political-classification-guide.md (7-dimension classification per document)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-overview">Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-overview">Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 pie title Document Priority Tier Distribution
     "Tier 1 — Critical (>9.0 DIW)" : 2
@@ -3339,7 +3339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-overview">Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidd
     "Tier 4 — Medium (5.0–6.9 DIW)" : 12
     "Tier 5 — Standard (&#x3C;5.0 DIW)" : 28</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document">7-Dimension Classification Per Key Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document">7-Dimension Classification Per Key Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3490,7 +3490,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document">7-Dimension Classificati
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Policy</th><th>Party</th><th>Stage</th><th>Impact</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Scope</th><th>GDPR basis</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Fiscal emergency relief</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Enacted/Law</td><td>9</td><td>Immediate</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Macroeconomic/Fiscal</td><td>M-led coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>9</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Fiscal/Budget</td><td>M-led coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>8</td><td>Immediate</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Healthcare/Accountability</td><td>S (IP to M)</td><td>Filed/Pending answer</td><td>8</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Regional→National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Energy/Electricity system</td><td>KD/L coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>8</td><td>Medium-term</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Foreign policy/Ukraine</td><td>M coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>8</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>International</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Constitutional/Grundlag</td><td>M coalition</td><td>First reading</td><td>8</td><td>Long-cycle</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>Fiscal/Climate opposition</td><td>S</td><td>Filed/Motion</td><td>8</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>Housing/Segregation</td><td>S (IP to KD)</td><td>Filed/Pending answer</td><td>8</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Urban</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property/Crime prevention</td><td>M coalition</td><td>Enacted</td><td>7</td><td>Immediate</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Energy/Wind power</td><td>KD/L coalition</td><td>Submitted</td><td>7</td><td>Medium-term</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional/Media</td><td>M coalition</td><td>First reading</td><td>8</td><td>Long-cycle</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-retention-and-access-classification">Retention and Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-and-access-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention-and-access-classification">Retention and Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-and-access-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3523,13 +3523,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention-and-access-classification">Retention and Access Classificat
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Classification</th><th>Count</th><th>Access</th><th>Retention</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Public — Primary source (riksdagen.se)</td><td>56</td><td>Unrestricted</td><td>Permanent</td></tr><tr><td>Public — Derived analysis (AI-generated)</td><td>23</td><td>Unrestricted</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>Special category — Political opinions</td><td>56</td><td>GDPR Art.9(2)(e) basis</td><td>5 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>GDPR Note</strong>: All documents analysed are publicly filed parliamentary documents. Political opinions expressed therein are Art. 9(2)(e) (manifestly made public by data subjects). Analysis products are Art. 9(2)(g) (substantial public interest — democratic accountability). No personal profiling beyond publicly declared political positions.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Tier-C cross-type synthesis + structural-metadata-methodology.md
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Cross-reference of all 4 sibling analysis folders + prior evening cycle</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry">Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry">Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3573,7 +3573,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry">Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Path</th><th>Key Artifact</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>committeeReports</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/</code></td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; HD01KU32/33 grundlag</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>interpellations</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/</code></td><td>HD10442-HD10446 S offensive</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>motions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/</code></td><td>HD024082/092/098 climate counter-motions</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>propositions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/</code></td><td>HD03100 vårproposition; HD03236 extra budget</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>Prior evening</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/</code></td><td>PIR-1 through PIR-7 prior cycle</td><td>Merged</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-matrix">Document Cross-Reference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-matrix">Document Cross-Reference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3734,8 +3734,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-matrix">Document Cross-Reference Matrix<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>type</th><th align="center">committeeReports</th><th align="center">interpellations</th><th align="center">motions</th><th align="center">propositions</th><th align="center">evening-analysis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>bet</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (lead story)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (source)</td><td align="center">✅ (enacted origin)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (energy relief)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (Svantesson accountability)</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>mot</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (dual-track contradiction)</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>mot</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>mot</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>bet</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (grundlag)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>bet</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (grundlag)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅ (Ukraine accountability)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference">Thematic Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread">Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference">Thematic Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread">Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: HD03100 (vårproposition), HD03236 (extra budget source)</li>
 <li><strong>committeeReports</strong>: HD01FiU48 (enacted)</li>
@@ -3743,24 +3743,24 @@ <h3 id="rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread">Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: HD10442-HD10446 (accountability response)</li>
 <li><strong>Evening synthesis</strong>: All 4 pillars converge → cross-party fiscal supermajority + S dual-track is today's main story</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread">Theme 2: Constitutional (Secondary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread">Theme 2: Constitutional (Secondary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>committeeReports</strong>: HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — two simultaneous grundlag first readings (KU)</li>
 <li><strong>Evening synthesis</strong>: constitutional reform at Stage 1; cross-reference with election 2026 analysis</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread">Theme 3: International/Ukraine (Tertiary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread">Theme 3: International/Ukraine (Tertiary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: HD03232 + HD03231 — Sweden joins Ukraine accountability frameworks</li>
 <li><strong>Evening synthesis</strong>: cross-reference with forward-indicators.md</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread">Theme 4: Opposition Accountability Offensive (Quaternary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread">Theme 4: Opposition Accountability Offensive (Quaternary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: HD10442-HD10446 — S targets Svantesson + housing/social ministers</li>
 <li><strong>evening-analysis</strong>: synthesis of coordinated opposition strategy</li>
 <li><strong>No sibling overlap</strong>: interpellations folder is the sole data source</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent">PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent">PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3808,13 +3808,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent">PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior PIR (2026-04-21)</th><th>Status Today</th><th>Current Evening Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1 Vårproposition fiscal stance</td><td>ADVANCED</td><td>HD03100 now confirmed pre-election fiscal manifesto; HD01FiU48 enacted strengthens conclusion</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2 Coalition stability</td><td>ADVANCED</td><td>Anomalous M+SD+S+KD majority on HD01FiU48 = new data point; government coalition still solid</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3 SD electoral positioning</td><td>UNCHANGED</td><td>No new SD-specific documents today</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4 Ukraine/foreign policy</td><td>ADVANCED</td><td>HD03232+HD03231 provide new evidence of Sweden's international commitments</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5 Municipal/regional</td><td>UNCHANGED</td><td>No new municipal docs today</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6 Grundlag/constitutional reform</td><td>ADVANCING</td><td>HD01KU32+HD01KU33 Stage-1 readings = concrete progress</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7 Election campaign postures</td><td>CRITICAL ADVANCE</td><td>S dual-track strategy + interpellation offensive = multi-vector campaign evidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Reflection ID</strong>: MR-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: osint-tradecraft-standards.md, ai-driven-analysis-guide.md
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment">Evidence Sufficiency Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment">Evidence Sufficiency Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Total documents in scope</strong>: 56 (20 primary + 36 via cross-reference)
 <strong>Documents with full text</strong>: 20 (HD01FiU48, HD10442-HD10446, HD03100, HD03232, HD03240, others via sibling folders)
 <strong>Metadata-only</strong>: 20 motions (HD024079–HD024098) — acceptable for strategic-level analysis</p>
@@ -3825,7 +3825,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment">Evidence Sufficiency Assessment<a cl
 <li>HD10442 exact Svantesson statements not available — IP text describes them as false per court ruling</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Level</th><th>Count</th><th>%</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Confirmed [A1]</td><td>35</td><td>63%</td><td>Direct primary source, confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Probably true [B2]</td><td>12</td><td>21%</td><td>Strong inference from multiple sources</td></tr><tr><td>Possibly true [B3]</td><td>7</td><td>13%</td><td>Single source or inference only</td></tr><tr><td>Cannot be judged [C3]</td><td>2</td><td>4%</td><td>Insufficient evidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Target distribution</strong>: >60% A1/B2 — ✅ ACHIEVED (84%)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-source-diversity-assessment">Source Diversity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-diversity-assessment">Source Diversity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3898,7 +3898,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-source-diversity-assessment">Source Diversity Assessment<a class="" a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source type</th><th>Count</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdagen.se (vote records, documents)</td><td>40</td><td>71%</td></tr><tr><td>regeringen.se</td><td>10</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>3</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Sibling folder analyses (cross-type)</td><td>4</td><td>7%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>P0/P1 claims</strong> all use multiple independent sources from riksdagen.se + vote record (HD01FiU48 CE14CCEF). Single-source claims flagged with [unconfirmed] where noted.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3952,7 +3952,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party coverage</th><th>Documents citing</th><th>Narratives per party</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td>8 docs</td><td>Both achievement (HD03100/FiU48) and accountability exposure (HD10442)</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>2 docs</td><td>Noted vote alignment, no editorial judgment</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>12 docs</td><td>Both strategy analysis (dual-track) and legitimate accountability role</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>4 docs</td><td>Policy achievements (Britz wind/energy)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>2 docs</td><td>Edholm co-signature on HD03236</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>2 docs</td><td>Partial motion HD024095 on utvisning</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>3 docs</td><td>Opposition motions documented without editorial judgment</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>4 docs</td><td>Climate opposition documented factually</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Balance check</strong>: All 8 parties represented. No party assigned uniform positive or negative framing. ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4010,19 +4010,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 Standard</th><th>Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Sourcing — Every claim cites primary source</td><td>✅</td><td>All key claims cite dok_id or riksdagen.se URL</td></tr><tr><td>2. Uncertainty — Probability language consistent with confidence</td><td>✅</td><td>WEP language used: "Likely", "Probable", "Possible", "Remote"</td></tr><tr><td>3. Analytic tradecraft — SAT applied</td><td>✅</td><td>ACH in devils-advocate.md; scenario analysis; red team</td></tr><tr><td>4. Consistency — No contradictions across artifacts</td><td>✅</td><td>Cross-artifact review completed</td></tr><tr><td>5. Objectivity — No advocacy</td><td>✅</td><td>Party neutrality arithmetic passed</td></tr><tr><td>6. Timeliness — Analysis reflects current events</td><td>✅</td><td>Based on same-day data (HD01FiU48 voted today)</td></tr><tr><td>7. Proper use of sources — No misrepresentation</td><td>✅</td><td>All citations checked against original documents</td></tr><tr><td>8. Visual communication — Mermaid diagrams present</td><td>✅</td><td>≥1 per core synthesis file</td></tr><tr><td>9. Review — Pass 2 completed</td><td>✅</td><td>All files reviewed and improved</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time vote data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time vote data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration"></a></h4>
 <p>The FiU48 vote record (CE14CCEF) was available but grouped party-level data was API-sync-delayed. Future runs should wait 2 hours post-vote for party-level data before finalising significance scoring. This would improve confidence from [B2] to [A1] on vote analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database">Improvement 2: IP scheduling database<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database">Improvement 2: IP scheduling database<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellation scheduling (when debates occur) is critical for assessing accountability risk timelines. A persistent PIR tracker mapping IP dok_id → scheduled debate date would improve lead-time on ministerial accountability scenarios. Recommend populating analysis/data/ip-tracker.json with scheduled dates.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness">Improvement 3: Cross-type synthesis completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness">Improvement 3: Cross-type synthesis completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness"></a></h4>
 <p>Today's sibling folders (committeeReports, interpellations, motions, propositions) each had 9 of 23 required artifacts — partial analyses. Evening analysis had to reconstruct full intelligence from these partial inputs. If sibling folder analyses were complete (all 23), evening synthesis quality would improve significantly. Flag incomplete sibling analyses as a data quality issue.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency">Improvement 4: WEP language consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency">Improvement 4: WEP language consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency"></a></h4>
 <p>Some artifacts used "probable" (not in canonical WEP 7-band list per political-style-guide.md). Canonical WEP bands are: Almost certain / Very likely / Likely / Roughly even / Unlikely / Very unlikely / Remote. Replace "probable" with "Likely" in next cycle.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance">Improvement 5: SAT catalog compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance">Improvement 5: SAT catalog compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance"></a></h4>
 <p>This run used: Scenario Analysis, ACH, Red Team, Hypothesis Testing, SWOT, TOWS, Evidence Scoring. Total: 7 techniques. Target: ≥10 named SAT techniques. Add for next cycle: Structured Self-Critique, Key Assumptions Check (explicit table), Indicators and Warning analysis, Premortem Analysis.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-evening-analysis
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24808228341
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-22T23:40:00Z
@@ -4031,7 +4031,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>MCP Server</strong>: riksdag-regering (live, confirmed at 23:38:58Z)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~144 days (September 13, 2026)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4058,7 +4058,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Server</th><th>Status</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdag-regering</td><td>✅ Live</td><td>Confirmed 2026-04-22T23:38:58Z</td></tr><tr><td>world-bank</td><td>✅ Available</td><td>Sweden GDP/inflation data</td></tr><tr><td>scb</td><td>✅ Available</td><td>Statistics Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4101,7 +4101,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses (T
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Articles</th><th>Key dok_ids</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/</td><td>16 docs</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/</td><td>5 docs</td><td>HD10442, HD10443, HD10444, HD10445, HD10446</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/</td><td>20 docs</td><td>HD024082, HD024092, HD024098, HD024090, HD024097</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/</td><td>15 docs</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03240, HD03232</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/</td><td>Partial</td><td>Prior cycle reference</td><td>✅ Available</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis">Consolidated Documents for Today's Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis">Consolidated Documents for Today's Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4276,7 +4276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis">Consolidated Docu
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Source folder</th><th>Full-text</th><th>DIW</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>9.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget för 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Uttalanden om ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas vid husrannsakan</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>8.1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt av nyckelfastigheter</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — S motion mot sänkt drivmedelsskatt</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — V motion mot sänkt drivmedelsskatt</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — MP motion mot sänkt drivmedelsskatt</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning</td><td>mot (V)</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning (C, partial)</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkning av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>7.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>7.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>7.2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för bostadsrätter</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>7.0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden GDP growth 2024: 0.82% (World Bank)</li>
 <li>Sweden GDP growth 2023: -0.20%</li>
@@ -4284,11 +4284,59 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>Sweden Unemployment 2025: 8.7%</li>
 <li>Fiscal impact HD01FiU48: −4.1 billion SEK budget balance</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>API returned 0 direct hits for 2026-04-22 in real-time search; all data sourced from sibling folder analyses produced during today's earlier workflow runs</li>
 <li>Cross-type synthesis integrates 56 distinct documents across 4 article types</li>
 <li>Prior cycle PIRs read from analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/ for continuity</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4356,7 +4404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:08.848Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:30.272Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html b/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html
index 9f8a5445a1..c4de0353e8 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.051Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.475Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.051Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.475Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-22T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief","description":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package today (HD01FiU48) with an anomalous M+SD+S+KD supermajority — the Social Democrats abandoning their climate…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:09.051Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief","description":"Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package today (HD01FiU48) with an anomalous M+SD+S+KD supermajority — the Social Democrats abandoning their climate…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:30.475Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03232-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliament enacted a 4.1 billion SEK emergency energy relief package today (HD01FiU48) with an anomalous M+SD+S+KD supermajority — the Social Democrats abandoning their climate counter-motion to avoid being blamed for high fuel costs four months before the September 2026 election. Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) simultaneously faces a concentrated five-interpellation accountability offensive from S, including one (HD10442) citing a court ruling that her public statements on eating disorder care were factually incorrect. The Spring Proposition 2026 (HD03100) sets the pre-election fiscal battleground.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Media/editorial decision</strong>: Is the "S votes for fuel tax cut while filing counter-motion" narrative the lead story for the day? → <strong>Yes.</strong> The dual-track behaviour (HD01FiU48 vote Ja + HD024082 opposing motion) is the most analytically significant finding of the day. It reveals S's electoral calculation — pre-election cost-of-living calculus overrides climate consistency. Confidence: HIGH [A1].</p>
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Support
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-bullet-read">⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-bullet-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-bullet-read">⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-bullet-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>ENACTED TODAY</strong>: HD01FiU48 — 4.1 GSEK fuel tax cut &#x26; energy support, voted 16:29. M+SD+S+KD voted Ja.</li>
 <li><strong>STRATEGIC CONTRADICTION</strong>: S votes Ja on enacted bill but filed opposition motion (HD024082) against same policy.</li>
@@ -246,11 +246,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-bullet-read">⚡ 60-Second Bullet Read<a class="" aria-hid
 <li><strong>CLIMATE-FISCAL DIVIDE</strong>: MP+V+S filed parallel climate counter-motions even as S voted for the fuel tax relief.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch for</strong>: Riksdag debate on HD10442 (Svantesson ätstörningsvård IP) — scheduled post-May 5. If Svantesson cannot reconcile her prior public statements with the court ruling, this becomes the biggest ministerial accountability moment of the pre-election period. Probability of significant political damage: <strong>Likely</strong> [B2] (65%).</p>
 <p><strong>Secondary trigger</strong>: S's position on HD03100 vårproposition in FiU committee proceedings — their alternative fiscal document will define the election economic debate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-dashboard">📊 Confidence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-dashboard">📊 Confidence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1B5E20', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'nodeBorder': '#FFFFFF'}}}%%
 pie title Confidence Distribution by Admiralty Code
     "A1 — Confirmed/Reliable (60%)" : 60
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--confidence-dashboard">📊 Confidence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li>Svantesson's parliamentary exposure from HD10442 court reference</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Synthesis ID</strong>: SYN-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 23:50 UTC
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~144 (September 13, 2026)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY: HD01FiU48 ENACTED — Extra Ändringsbudget 4.1 GSEK adopted today by anomalous cross-party supermajority</strong></p>
 <p>The Finance Committee betänkande HD01FiU48 (proposition HD03236) was voted through at 16:29:36 on 2026-04-22 with support from M, SD, S, and KD — a politically extraordinary coalition. The package temporarily cuts petrol tax by 82 öre/litre and diesel by 319 SEK/m³ (May–September 2026) and provides electricity/gas price support for January–February 2026 consumers. The combined budget deterioration is 4.1 billion SEK. The fact that S (opposition) voted <em>alongside</em> the governing coalition on an energy-relief package four months before the September 2026 election reveals both the political potency of energy costs as an electoral issue and the limits of S's climate positioning when household economics dominate the news cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY: Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100 + HD0399) — Pre-election fiscal positioning battle begins</strong></p>
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>QUATERNARY: Cross-party opposition climate fracture — S+V+MP file parallel counter-motions on fuel tax cut (HD024082/092/098)</strong></p>
 <p>Three opposition parties filed nearly identical counter-motions rejecting HD03236 on climate grounds. Yet S voted <em>for</em> HD01FiU48 (the committee betänkande) — a strategic contradiction that signals S's dual-track posture: oppose symbolically in committee motions while supporting the relief measure in the chamber to avoid being blamed for higher energy costs.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A["🔴 CRITICAL — TIER 1&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48: Extra Budget ADOPTED&#x3C;br/>4.1 GSEK | Cross-party M+SD+S+KD&#x3C;br/>DIW 9.2 | Confidence: HIGH [A1]"]
     B["🟠 HIGH — TIER 2&#x3C;br/>HD03100: Vårproposition 2026&#x3C;br/>Pre-election fiscal framework&#x3C;br/>DIW 9.0 | Confidence: HIGH [A1]"]
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence
     style G fill:#1565C0,color:#FFFFFF,stroke:#90CAF9
     style H fill:#37474F,color:#FFFFFF,stroke:#90A4AE</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     subgraph "💰 FISCAL EMERGENCY (FiU)"
         FIU48["HD01FiU48&#x3C;br/>ENACTED 16:29 TODAY&#x3C;br/>4.1 GSEK fuel+energy relief"]
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence
     style KU33 fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     style HD3232 fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-intelligence-findings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--top-5-intelligence-findings">🏆 Top 5 Intelligence Findings<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>Finding</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>S voted <em>for</em> HD01FiU48 fuel tax cut while simultaneously filing counter-motion HD024082 — dual-track strategy exposing electoral calculation over climate consistency</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote records + HD024082 (riksdagen.se)</td><td>Pre-election horse-trading overrides climate principle</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD10442 places Svantesson in accountability spotlight: court upheld Region Stockholm's position that her public statements were factually wrong</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se IP filed 2026-04-21)</td><td>Ministerial credibility risk during budget season</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Vårproposition HD03100 is the final pre-election fiscal manifesto; S will use every clause as an election battleground</td><td>HD03100 (riksdagen.se, Finansdepartementet, 2026-04-13)</td><td>Defines economic agenda for September 2026</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Two simultaneous grundlag first readings (HD01KU33 + HD01KU32) represent extraordinary legislative tempo for constitutional changes</td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32 (riksdagen.se)</td><td>Long-cycle: effects felt in 2027–2028</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Sweden joining both the Ukraina compensation register (HD03232) and aggression tribunal (HD03231) signals deepening Western alignment on post-war accountability</td><td>HD03232 + HD03231 (riksdagen.se, UU committee)</td><td>Geopolitical commitment beyond NATO membership</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Collection method</strong>: Open-source parliamentary records (riksdagen.se API via riksdag-regering MCP). All documents are publicly filed (GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)).
 <strong>PIR coverage</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -420,47 +420,47 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Meta Description: "The Riksdag voted through a 4.1 billion SEK fuel tax and energy price relief package on April 22, 2026 — with the opposition Social Democrats joining the governing coalition in an extraordinary cross-party majority, signalling the start of the pre-election economic battle."</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Assessment ID</strong>: IA-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] overall
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days to election</strong>: 144</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>The S dual-track strategy on HD01FiU48 — voting Ja in chamber while filing climate counter-motion — is a deliberate electoral calculation, not a policy incoherence.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: S MPs on FiU voted Ja at 16:29 2026-04-22 (riksdagen.se vote record CE14CCEF) while the same party filed HD024082 opposing the same proposition the preceding week. Both actions are confirmed primary-source facts. The strategic logic — avoiding blame for high energy costs while signalling climate credentials to the base — is the only coherent explanation.</p>
 <p><strong>Key Assumption</strong>: S believes the general electorate prioritises cost-of-living over climate consistency in the final 144 days before September 2026 election. If polling shows climate consistently dominating economic concerns (LOW probability), this judgment would be revised.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-1</strong>: What is S's unified electoral positioning on fiscal policy? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — dual-track confirmed.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) faces a heightened ministerial accountability risk from interpellation HD10442 because the court documentation attached makes denial structurally difficult.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10442 (riksdagen.se, filed 2026-04-21 by Markus Kallifatides, S) references a court ruling that upheld Region Stockholm's position on eating disorder care — a position directly contradicting Svantesson's public statements. The accountability chain is: (1) Svantesson makes public statement, (2) Region Stockholm challenges in court, (3) court upholds Region Stockholm, (4) S files IP citing court ruling. Step 4 confirmed; ministerial exposure is probable [B2] but not certain — a skilled parliamentary response could neutralise it.</p>
 <p><strong>Key Assumption</strong>: Svantesson's original statements were indeed the ones characterised in the IP. If the IP mischaracterises her statements (possible [C3]), this judgment weakens.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-2</strong>: Is ministerial accountability creating pre-election risk? → <strong>PARTIALLY ANSWERED</strong> — exposure identified, outcome TBD.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>The Spring Proposition 2026 (HD03100) — the last vårproposition before the September 2026 election — defines the central economic battleground, and S will systematically contest every major fiscal assumption.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: VERY HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD03100 (riksdagen.se, Finansdepartementet, 2026-04-13 by Elisabeth Svantesson) is the formal statement of the government's multi-year fiscal framework. The document sets riktlinjer (spending guidelines) and fiscal targets. Sweden GDP growth 2024: 0.82% (World Bank), 2023: −0.20% — weak trajectory provides S with ammunition. Every budget assumption becomes campaign material.</p>
 <p><strong>Key Assumption</strong>: Swedish parliamentary calendar proceeds normally. No early election disrupts the standard committee proceedings.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-3</strong>: What fiscal framework defines the election battle? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — HD03100 confirmed as the battleground document.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>The simultaneous grundlag first readings (HD01KU33 + HD01KU32) reflect an unusually active constitutional reform agenda that will require a second reading in the next riksmöte — creating campaign complications for all parties.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01KU33 (husrannsakan insyn) and HD01KU32 (medietillgänglighet) are both in first reading (vilande) as of 2026-04-22 (riksdagen.se, KU committee). Both are grundlag changes requiring second reading after election. This means whichever party/coalition wins September 2026 will inherit these constitutional changes — creating electoral accountability for their content.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-4</strong>: Constitutional reform pipeline status? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — two simultaneous first readings active.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Sweden's accession to both the Ukraina compensation commission (HD03232) and the international aggression tribunal (HD03231) on the same day signals a coherent and deepening Western alignment commitment beyond mere NATO membership.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD03232 + HD03231 (riksdagen.se, UU committee, submitted 2026-04-16) — both passed through riksdag committee process and submitted by Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M). Two distinct legal frameworks on the same day = coordinated foreign policy signalling.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-5</strong>: Sweden's Ukraine commitment trajectory? → <strong>ANSWERED</strong> — deepening confirmed.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21">Prior-Cycle PIR Continuity (Carried-Forward from 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21">Prior-Cycle PIR Continuity (Carried-Forward from 2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-continuity-carried-forward-from-2026-04-21">Prior-Cyc
 <li>PIR-C: How will EU Commission respond to fuel tax measures in HD03236?</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -537,13 +537,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>If wrong...</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S's Ja vote on HD01FiU48 was deliberate strategy</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td><td>Low</td><td>If S claims it was a party discipline failure, KJ-1 weakens but remains directionally correct</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson's statements were as characterised in HD10442</td><td>MEDIUM [B2]</td><td>HIGH</td><td>If mischaracterised, KJ-2 collapses</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 vårproposition proceeds to committee vote normally</td><td>VERY HIGH [A1]</td><td>Low</td><td>Extremely low probability of committee blocking</td></tr><tr><td>Election remains on schedule September 13, 2026</td><td>VERY HIGH [A1]</td><td>Low</td><td>Early election (5% probability, Wild Card W1)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Methodology</strong>: DIW weighting per significance-scoring.md template
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Cross-type synthesis of 20 key documents across 4 article types</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-scoring-framework">📊 DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-scoring-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">📊 DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-framework"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-scoring-framework">📊 DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Weight</th><th>Scale</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>D (Depth)</td><td>25%</td><td>1–10</td><td>Breadth/completeness of source document</td></tr><tr><td>I (Immediacy)</td><td>40%</td><td>1–10</td><td>Recency; speed of real-world effect</td></tr><tr><td>W (Width of Impact)</td><td>35%</td><td>1–10</td><td>Population affected; policy breadth</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>DIW Score = (D × 0.25) + (I × 0.40) + (W × 0.35), normalised to 10</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-documents">Ranked Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-documents">Ranked Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-documents"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D1["🏆 9.2 | HD01FiU48&#x3C;br/>Extra ändringsbudget ENACTED&#x3C;br/>Voted 2026-04-22 16:29"]
     D2["🥈 9.0 | HD03100&#x3C;br/>Vårproposition 2026&#x3C;br/>Pre-election fiscal framework"]
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-documents">Ranked Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
     style D12 fill:#37474F,color:#FFFFFF
     style D13 fill:#546E7A,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table">Detailed DIW Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table">Detailed DIW Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -737,17 +737,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-detailed-diw-scoring-table">Detailed DIW Scoring Table<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abridged)</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget ENACTED</td><td>9</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.2</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>10</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.5</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD10442</td><td>Ätstörningsvård IP</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Husrannsakan insyn (grundlag)</td><td>9</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.1</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya elsystemlagar</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraina skadeståndskomm.</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Medietillgänglighet (grundlag)</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.9</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt IP</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>[A1]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024082</td><td>S counter-motion fuel tax</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.5</strong></td><td>[B2]</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If S had voted Nej on HD01FiU48</strong>: The electoral and strategic significance score would drop from 9.2 to 7.0 — the measure would be a standard coalition achievement, not a cross-party anomaly.</p>
 <p><strong>If HD10442 debate is scheduled before the election</strong>: Significance rises from 8.3 to 9.0+ if Svantesson cannot credibly respond to the court documentation.</p>
 <p><strong>If HD03100 Vårproposition fails FiU committee vote</strong>: This would be a constitutional crisis; significance would reach 10.0. Probability: Remote [E5] (&#x3C;3%).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Media Framing
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predictions">Per-Party Framing Predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predictions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-party-framing-predictions">Per-Party Framing Predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predictions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predictions">Per-Party Framing Predictions<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Expected framing of HD01FiU48</th><th>Expected framing of S interpellations</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>"Responsible relief for Swedish households"</td><td>Dismissal: "political theatre"</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>"We delivered for ordinary Swedes"</td><td>Attack: "Why did S wait until now?"</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>"Family economic relief"</td><td>Neutral — own issues dominate</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>"We refused to increase fossil dependency"</td><td>Neutral — differentiation</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>"Relief for families + we hold government accountable"</td><td>"Concrete accountability on every front"</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>"Wrong tool — climate regression"</td><td>Supportive of IP accountability</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>"Pre-election populism at climate cost"</td><td>Mixed — supports welfare IPs</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Split: rural C supports, urban C opposes</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-media-quadrant-analysis">Media Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-quadrant-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-media-quadrant-analysis">Media Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-quadrant-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Media Framing: HD01FiU48 Coverage Prediction
@@ -817,27 +817,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-media-quadrant-analysis">Media Quadrant Analysis<a class="" aria-hidd
     SVT: [0.50, 0.90]
     SR: [0.48, 0.75]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-framing-battles">Key Framing Battles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-framing-battles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy">Battle 1: "Relief" vs. "Fossil Subsidy"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-framing-battles">Key Framing Battles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-framing-battles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy">Battle 1: "Relief" vs. "Fossil Subsidy"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-1-relief-vs-fossil-subsidy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government + S framing</strong>: This is household cost relief for families facing high fuel bills</li>
 <li><strong>V+MP+L framing</strong>: This is a retrograde fossil fuel subsidy at exactly the wrong moment</li>
 <li><strong>Prediction</strong>: Relief framing will dominate Swedish tabloid media (Expressen, Aftonbladet) in the short term; fossil subsidy framing will dominate opinion/editorial pages (DN, SvD environmental desks)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist">Battle 2: S Credibility — "Consistent Opposition" vs. "Opportunist"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist">Battle 2: S Credibility — "Consistent Opposition" vs. "Opportunist"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-2-s-credibility--consistent-opposition-vs-opportunist"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S framing</strong>: We support families AND hold the government accountable</li>
 <li><strong>Government parties framing</strong>: S voted Ja for the measure they filed a motion against — they cannot be trusted</li>
 <li><strong>Prediction</strong>: Government parties will use the dual-track contradiction in campaign ads. S will rely on voters not tracking committee motions.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction">Battle 3: "Accountability" vs. "Obstruction"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction">Battle 3: "Accountability" vs. "Obstruction"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-battle-3-accountability-vs-obstruction"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S framing (interpellations)</strong>: We ask hard questions with court documentation</li>
 <li><strong>Government framing</strong>: Opposition filibustering pre-election with procedural tools</li>
 <li><strong>Prediction</strong>: HD10442 eating disorder court documentation makes this difficult to dismiss as obstruction — media will cover the specific case</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-radar">Narrative Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-radar"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-radar">Narrative Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-radar"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Dominant expected narrative for 2026-04-22 evening news</strong>:</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Riksdag enacts fuel tax relief with broad cross-party support, while Socialdemokraterna simultaneously signals opposition through committee motions — and files five accountability interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson."</p>
@@ -845,12 +845,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-radar">Narrative Radar<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>This narrative is</strong>: Complex (two S positions simultaneously), high-stakes (144 days to election), and rich in specifics (the court documentation elevates HD10442 above typical political theatre).</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B3] — media framing prediction based on structural analysis of party positions and historical press coverage patterns; not verified against actual press coverage.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: stakeholder-impact.md (6-lens matrix, named actors)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network-overview">Influence Network Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-overview">Influence Network Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     GOV["Tidö Government&#x3C;br/>M+KD+L+C"]
@@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network-overview">Influence Network Overview<a class="" ari
     style SVAN fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style KALI fill:#C62828,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc">Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc">Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M), Acting PM Lotta Edholm (L), Minister Johan Britz (KD), Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)</p>
 
 
@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-governing-coalition-mkdlc">Lens 1: Governing Coalition (M+KD+L
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position on HD01FiU48</th><th>Position on Vårproposition</th><th>Threat exposure</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td>Champion — authored via Finansdepartementet</td><td>Architect of HD03100</td><td>HIGH — Svantesson accountability (HD10442)</td><td>HD03100/HD03236 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td>Supported</td><td>Supported</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote</td></tr><tr><td>L (Liberalerna)</td><td>Supported (Edholm co-signed HD03236)</td><td>Supported</td><td>MEDIUM — wind power YIMBY frictions</td><td>HD03239 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>C (Centerpartiet)</td><td>Supported</td><td>Supported</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM — filed partial opposition motion HD024095 on utvisning</td><td>HD024095 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-support-party-sd">Lens 2: Support Party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-support-party-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-support-party-sd">Lens 2: Support Party (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-support-party-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Julia Kronlid, Patrick Reslow, Björn Söder (SD, voted Ja on HD01FiU48)</p>
 
 
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-support-party-sd">Lens 2: Support Party (SD)<a class="" aria-h
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Position</th><th>Analysis</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48</td><td>SD prioritises cost-of-living measures for their voter base; fuel tax cut directly benefits SD's working-class electorate</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote records, riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>No counter-motion filed</td><td>SD has no climate objections to fuel tax cut — consistent with their anti-green agenda</td><td>Absence of SD counter-motion (riksdagen.se)</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine IPs: unclear</td><td>SD's position on HD03232 (Ukraina commission) not confirmed in available data</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s">Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s">Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Kenneth G. Forslund, Anders Ygeman, Mikael Damberg, Fredrik Olovsson (FiU), Markus Kallifatides, Peder Björk, Jonathan Svensson, Åsa Eriksson (interpellants)</p>
 
 
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-main-opposition-s">Lens 3: Main Opposition (S)<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Action</th><th>Strategic calculation</th><th>Contradiction</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48</td><td>Electoral calculus: cannot be seen opposing household energy relief 4 months before election</td><td>Simultaneously filed HD024082 opposing the same policy</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote + HD024082 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Filed 5 interpellations in 48 hours</td><td>Pre-election accountability escalation</td><td>None — internally consistent strategy</td><td>HD10442–HD10446 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Coordinated HD10442 with court evidence</td><td>Strongest possible accountability mechanism — court ruling makes denial impossible</td><td>May overreach if Svantesson issues convincing clarification</td><td>HD10442 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v">Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP, V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v">Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP, V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Named actors</strong>: Opposition MPs filing HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP), HD024090 (V), HD024097 (MP), HD024096 (MP)</p>
 
 
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-greenleft-opposition-mp-v">Lens 4: Green/Left Opposition (MP,
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Key concern</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MP (Miljöpartiet)</td><td>Opposed HD01FiU48; filed 5 motions including HD024098</td><td>Climate catastrophism risk from fuel tax cut</td><td>HD024098 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td>Opposed HD01FiU48; filed HD024092, HD024090-091</td><td>Economic justice + anti-arms export (HD024091)</td><td>HD024092 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Both parties</td><td>Opposed new utvisning rules but with different framings</td><td>V: rule-of-law; MP: human rights</td><td>HD024090/097 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors">Lens 5: Civil Society / Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors">Lens 5: Civil Society / Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-civil-society--institutional-actors">Lens 5: Civil Society / I
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Relevance</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Region Stockholm</td><td>Vindicated by court in eating disorder care case referenced in HD10442</td><td>HD10442 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Riksrevisionen (NAO)</td><td>Filed two reports: HD01MJU21 (climate transition in agriculture) + HD01CU42 (estate management)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish consumers (~5M motorists)</td><td>Direct beneficiaries of HD01FiU48 fuel tax cut May–Sep 2026</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal note</td></tr><tr><td>Ukrainian government</td><td>Benefits from HD03232 compensation commission + HD03231 aggression tribunal</td><td>HD03232+HD03231 riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment">Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment">Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1086,13 +1086,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-electoral-impact-assessment">Lens 6: Electoral Impact Assessme
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>E2026 impact of today's events</th><th>Probability of gain/loss</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Svantesson accountability risk (HD10442) threatens Finance Minister's credibility — key election asset</td><td>LOSS risk: Likely [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Dual-track strategy on HD01FiU48 may lose climate voters to MP/V; gains cost-of-living credibility</td><td>MIXED: net neutral</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Benefited from HD01FiU48 passage (aligned with voter base); no accountability exposure today</td><td>GAIN: Possible [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>MP/V</td><td>HD024082/092/098 counter-motions signal climate differentiation from S — potential voter gain</td><td>GAIN from S: Possible [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>KD/L</td><td>No major exposure; KD (Johan Britz) advancing wind power (positive)</td><td>STABLE</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Forward Indicators
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Horizons</strong>: 72h / 1 week / 1 month / election (≥10 indicators required)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-25">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-25)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-01</td><td>Press coverage of HD01FiU48 vote in Expressen/Aftonbladet</td><td>Tabloid coverage confirms public visibility</td><td>[B2]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-02</td><td>Fuel station pump price changes visible (first published data)</td><td>Konkurrensverket / petroleum industry pricing</td><td>[B3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-03</td><td>Government response to HD10442 interpellation (Svantesson/minister team)</td><td>Official response filing in Riksdag — watch for delay tactics</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-04</td><td>S leadership statement clarifying dual-track on HD01FiU48</td><td>Press conference or social media — watch for messaging coherence</td><td>[B2]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29">1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29">1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-week-horizon-by-2026-04-29">1-Week Horizon (by 2026-04-29)<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-05</td><td>SCB consumer confidence data (if scheduled)</td><td>May reflect energy cost expectations</td><td>[C3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-06</td><td>Riksdag calendar — debate scheduling for HD10442-HD10446</td><td>Formal debate booking = escalation confirmed</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-07</td><td>Additional S interpellations filed (PIR-7 continuity indicator)</td><td>Watch for >2 new IPs from S → confirms coordinated campaign</td><td>[B2]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-08</td><td>C (Centerpartiet) public position clarification on HD01FiU48</td><td>Split within C on fuel vs. climate may emerge in press</td><td>[B3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22">1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22">1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-month-horizon-by-2026-05-22">1-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-22)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-09</td><td>First fuel tax cut take-up data (Skatteverket administrative)</td><td>Administrative confirmation of effective reduction</td><td>[B2]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-10</td><td>Riksdag interpellation debate for HD10442 (formal answer from Svantesson)</td><td>Substance of Svantesson's response will reveal if court documentation is contested</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-11</td><td>HD01KU32/KU33 grundlag second-reading scheduling</td><td>Constitutional reform timeline — if not scheduled before summer recess, delays to 2026/27 Riksdag</td><td>[A1]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-12</td><td>Polling shifts: S rural vs. S urban (if YouGov/Novus release party sub-group data)</td><td>Tests whether HD01FiU48 Ja vote changed S rural support</td><td>[C3]</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09">Election Horizon (by 2026-09)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09">Election Horizon (by 2026-09)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-horizon-by-2026-09">Election Horizon (by 2026-09)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-13</td><td>General election result: S bloc vs. Government bloc seat count</td><td>Primary PIR-2 (coalition stability) resolution</td><td>[B3]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-14</td><td>Fuel tax sunset clause renewal decision (post-election)</td><td>Confirms whether temporary measure becomes permanent spending commitment</td><td>[B3]</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-15</td><td>Grundlag Stage 2 vote in new Riksdag</td><td>Tests continuity of constitutional reform will</td><td>[B3]</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-16</td><td>Svantesson position (Finance Minister) post-election</td><td>HD10442 court documentation may affect political sustainability</td><td>[C3]</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-watch-linkage">PIR Watch Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-watch-linkage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-watch-linkage">PIR Watch Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-watch-linkage"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1302,18 +1302,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-watch-linkage">PIR Watch Linkage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Lead indicator</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1 (Fiscal stance)</td><td>FI-09 (fuel tax take-up), FI-14 (renewal)</td><td>1 month / election</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2 (Coalition stability)</td><td>FI-08 (C position), FI-13 (election)</td><td>1 week / election</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4 (Foreign policy)</td><td>(not triggered today — Ukraine framework is stable)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6 (Constitutional)</td><td>FI-11 (KU scheduling), FI-15 (Stage 2)</td><td>1 month / election</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7 (Campaign postures)</td><td>FI-04 (S messaging), FI-07 (new IPs), FI-16 (Svantesson)</td><td>72h / 1 week / election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-summary">Indicator Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-summary">Indicator Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Total indicators</strong>: 16 (exceeds minimum requirement of 10)
 <strong>Horizon coverage</strong>: 4/4 horizons represented (72h: 4, 1-week: 4, 1-month: 4, election: 4)
 <strong>Admiralty range</strong>: [A1] through [C3] — appropriate uncertainty gradient across time horizons</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>SCN-ID</strong>: SCN-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: scenario-analysis.md template
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 mindmap
     root((Sweden April 2026&#x3C;br/>Scenario Space))
@@ -1325,8 +1325,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-taxonomy">Scenario Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
             W1_Early["W1: Early Election&#x3C;br/>5% — Coalition collapse"]
             W2_EU["W2: EU Challenge&#x3C;br/>5% — Commission challenges fuel measure"]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45">Scenario 1: Coalition Consolidation (Probability: 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-base-scenario-analysis">Base Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-base-scenario-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45">Scenario 1: Coalition Consolidation (Probability: 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: HD01FiU48 delivers electoral dividend for the governing coalition; Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100) becomes the positive narrative anchor; S accountability offensive fails to gain traction.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers confirming S1</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-1-coalition-consolidation-probability-45">Scenario 1: Coalit
 <p><strong>Strategic implications for government</strong>: Double down on fiscal responsibility narrative; advance HD03240 (electricity system) as forward-looking policy; schedule HD10442 debate late to minimise exposure.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Based on inference from electoral context, not confirmed intelligence</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30">Scenario 2: Accountability Crisis (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30">Scenario 2: Accountability Crisis (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: S's coordinated accountability offensive succeeds; HD10442 forces Svantesson into publicly untenable position; Finance Committee activities become a pre-election liability.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers confirming S2</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-2-accountability-crisis-probability-30">Scenario 2: Accounta
 <p><strong>Strategic implications for opposition</strong>: Maintain consistent messaging; seek media partners for investigative coverage; consider linking to broader healthcare accountability narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — Probable; court documentation provides unusually strong evidentiary basis for this scenario</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15">Scenario 3: Climate Fracture (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15">Scenario 3: Climate Fracture (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: S's Ja vote on HD01FiU48 while simultaneously filing counter-motions erodes their climate credibility; MP and V gain at S's expense among climate-prioritising voters.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers confirming S3</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1377,17 +1377,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-3-climate-fracture-probability-15">Scenario 3: Climate Fract
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Possible; dependent on media frame choices not yet determined</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5">Scenario 4: Wild Card — EU Challenge (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5">Scenario 4: Wild Card — EU Challenge (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4-wild-card--eu-challenge-probability-5"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: European Commission challenges HD03236/HD01FiU48 fuel tax reduction as incompatible with EU energy taxation directive or state aid rules.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers</strong>: Any Commission preliminary investigation notification; formal infringement proceedings</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [D4] — Remotely possible; based on general EU legal framework, no specific intelligence</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5">Scenario 5: Wild Card — Early Election (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5">Scenario 5: Wild Card — Early Election (Probability: 5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5-wild-card--early-election-probability-5"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Definition</strong>: Accountability pressure accumulates beyond manageable level; Kristersson government faces confidence vote; early election called.</p>
 <p><strong>Triggers</strong>: HD10442 + additional accountability cases trigger combined confidence motion from S+V+MP; L or C defects from coalition</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [E5] — Remote; current parliamentary arithmetic makes this very unlikely before September 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 pie title Scenario Probabilities (Sums to 100%)
     "S1: Coalition Consolidation (45%)" : 45
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<
     "W1: Early Election (5%)" : 5
     "W2: EU Challenge (5%)" : 5</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators Per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators Per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1452,12 +1452,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators Per Scenario<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Svantesson clear response to HD10442</td><td>Parliamentary debate</td><td>2026-05-05+</td></tr><tr><td>S1</td><td>S polling stable or declining</td><td>Demoskop/SIFO</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-06</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>HD10442 debate scheduled before August</td><td>Speaker calendar</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-05</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>DN/SVT investigation on ätstörningsvård</td><td>Media</td><td>2026-05</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>MP/V gain on climate in polls</td><td>SIFO</td><td>2026-05 to 2026-07</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Climate NGO criticism of S</td><td>Public statements</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-05</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Commission notification on HD03236</td><td>EU Official Journal</td><td>2026-06+</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: political-risk-methodology.md (5-dimension register, L×I scoring)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-overview">Risk Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-overview">Risk Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#B71C1C', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Evening Analysis 2026-04-22
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-overview">Risk Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     EU Challenge on Fuel Tax Cut: [0.60, 0.25]
     Constitutional Reform Delay: [0.40, 0.35]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L (1–5)</th><th>I (1–5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Priority</th><th>Source</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson ministerial accountability crisis (HD10442 court ruling)</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-21)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>S dual-track strategy (Ja vote + opposition motion) alienates climate voters</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote + HD024082 (riksdagen.se)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-fiscal credibility gap widening pre-election</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HD024082/092/098 + HD01FiU48 enacted</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Budget deterioration (4.1 GSEK) affects fiscal credibility</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal note; World Bank GDP 0.82%</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Social dumpning becomes media escalation before election</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD10443 + HD10423 scheduled 2026-05-05</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission challenge to fuel tax cut compatibility</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU state aid rules; HD03236 fuel measure</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional reform (KU33 vilande) delayed in second reading</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD01KU33 first reading only</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture on vårproposition HD03100</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>CONTINGENCY</td><td>HD03100 — full coalition backing assumed</td><td>[C3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-cascading-chains">Risk Cascading Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-cascading-chains">Risk Cascading Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     R1["🔴 Svantesson HD10442&#x3C;br/>Accountability Risk&#x3C;br/>L=3, I=5, L×I=15"]
     R2["🔴 S Dual-Track&#x3C;br/>Climate Credibility&#x3C;br/>L=4, I=4, L×I=16"]
@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-cascading-chains">Risk Cascading Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style R5 fill:#F57F17,color:#FFFFFF
     style CRISIS fill:#C62828,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1623,13 +1623,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Base Rate</th><th>Updated P</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson faces significant parliamentary pressure from HD10442</td><td>45%</td><td><strong>65%</strong></td><td>Court documentation attached to IP — unusually strong evidentiary basis</td></tr><tr><td>S loses climate voters due to HD01FiU48 Ja vote</td><td>35%</td><td><strong>55%</strong></td><td>MP+V already signalling in motions; S base increasingly climate-conscious</td></tr><tr><td>Budget balance deteriorates further before June budget</td><td>40%</td><td><strong>60%</strong></td><td>Weak GDP growth trajectory + pre-election spending pressure</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443 social dumpning triggers media investigation</td><td>25%</td><td><strong>45%</strong></td><td>Pattern of multiple S interpellations on same theme is investigative journalism signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: political-swot-framework.md
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Cross-type synthesis — propositions, committee reports, interpellations, motions
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--swot-overview">🎯 SWOT Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--swot-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-overview">🎯 SWOT Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1B5E20', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'primaryBorderColor': '#C8E6C9', 'lineColor': '#546E7A', 'secondaryColor': '#0D47A1', 'tertiaryColor': '#37474F', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title SWOT — Sweden Parliament 2026-04-22 Evening Synthesis
@@ -1648,7 +1648,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--swot-overview">🎯 SWOT Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
     Election Year Budget Pressure: [0.35, 0.70]
     Pre-election Volatility: [0.20, 0.30]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--strengths">✅ Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Broad cross-party coalition enacted HD01FiU48 — demonstrates fiscal responsiveness to household cost pressures</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote record CE14CCEF: M+SD+S+KD voted Ja at riksdagen.se on 2026-04-22</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Coherent spring fiscal framework maintains surplus rule — HD03100 preserves fiscal discipline while providing household relief</td><td>HD03100 (riksdagen.se, Finansdepartementet, 2026-04-13) — surplus rule >0.33% GDP maintained</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Sweden deepens Ukraine accountability commitment via two international frameworks — demonstrates rule-of-law solidarity</td><td>HD03232 + HD03231 (riksdagen.se, UU committee, 2026-04-16) — joined both compensation register and aggression tribunal</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Energy system modernisation advances with new electricity laws and wind revenue sharing</td><td>HD03240 + HD03239 (riksdagen.se, Klimat- och näringsdepartementet, 2026-04-14) — major policy advances</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional reform pipeline active: two grundlag first readings simultaneous</td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32 (riksdagen.se, KU committee) — rarely seen dual constitutional readings</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1736,7 +1736,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-weaknesses">⚠️ Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Climate-fiscal contradiction: fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) contradicts Sweden's stated carbon tax trajectory</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted vs Sweden's longstanding fossil fuel tax policy trajectory; MP+V+S filed counter-motions HD024082/092/098 citing climate harm (riksdagen.se)</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>S dual-track electoral strategy undermines policy coherence: voted for relief while opposing in motion</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote (Ja, S) + HD024082 opposition motion same week (riksdagen.se) — direct contradiction</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson ministerial accountability exposure: HD10442 cites court ruling contradicting her public statements</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-21, M. Kallifatides/S) — court upheld Region Stockholm, Svantesson's statements deemed incorrect</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr><tr><td>Budget deterioration of 4.1 GSEK in pre-election spending context risks medium-term fiscal credibility</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal impact note + Sweden GDP growth 2024 only 0.82% (World Bank)</td><td>[A1/B2]</td><td>Very likely</td></tr><tr><td>Social dumpning documented (HD10443) — municipalities illegally displacing vulnerable persons between jurisdictions reveals governance gap</td><td>HD10443 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-22, P. Björk/S) + related HD10423 already scheduled for answer 2026-05-05</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--opportunities">🚀 Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election fiscal package galvanises consumer confidence at critical 144-day-to-election moment</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; Sweden inflation dropping from 8.55% (2023) to 2.84% (2024) (World Bank) creates fiscal headroom</td><td>[A1/B2]</td><td>Likely</td></tr><tr><td>EU circular economy compliance via HD01MJU19 waste legislation positions Sweden as a leader in materials recovery</td><td>HD01MJU19 (riksdagen.se, MJU committee) — implements EU circular economy targets</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr><tr><td>Pre-emption rights debate (HD10445) opens housing segregation as electoral issue — S can position on urban justice</td><td>HD10445 (riksdagen.se, 2026-04-22, M. Kallifatides/S) — cites SOU 2024:38; government shelved this policy</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Likely</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power revenue sharing (HD03239) resolves key barrier to onshore wind expansion — long-term energy security</td><td>HD03239 (riksdagen.se, Klimat- och näringsdepartementet, 2026-04-14) — municipal resident compensation rights</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--threats">⚡ Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">⚡ Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1812,7 +1812,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--threats">⚡ Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hre
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Coordinated S accountability offensive could force political crisis before election</td><td>HD10442+10443+10444+10445+10446 (riksdagen.se): 5 interpellations in 48 hours targeting Finance Minister and Civil Minister</td><td>[A1]</td><td>Probable</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-fiscal gap could become primary S election attack vector if global energy prices normalise</td><td>HD024082/092/098 opposition motions (riksdagen.se) + Sweden commitment to Paris Agreement</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Likely</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal social dumping (HD10443) if unaddressed could generate media escalation pre-election</td><td>HD10443 + HD10423 (riksdagen.se) — pattern: multiple S interpellations on same theme signals investigative journalism likely</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Possible</td></tr><tr><td>4.1 GSEK budget deterioration in context of weak GDP growth risks credit agency scrutiny</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal note + World Bank Sweden GDP 2024: 0.82%, 2023: −0.20% — two consecutive near-zero years</td><td>[A1/B2]</td><td>Unlikely</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1835,13 +1835,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>External Opportunities</th><th>External Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Internal Strengths</strong></td><td>SO: Use cross-party fiscal coalition (HD01FiU48) to frame E2026 as government delivering household relief while investing in energy transition (HD03240+HD03239)</td><td>ST: Leverage Ukraine commitment (HD03232+HD03231) to shift media narrative from S accountability attacks to foreign policy strength</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Internal Weaknesses</strong></td><td>WO: Address S dual-track contradiction by forcing S to explain their simultaneous Ja vote and opposition motion</td><td>WT: Pre-empt Svantesson accountability crisis (HD10442) with proactive ministerial statement before IP debate is scheduled</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: political-threat-framework.md (Political Threat Taxonomy, attack tree)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: Elevated | <strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview">Political Threat Taxonomy Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview">Political Threat Taxonomy Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#C62828', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'lineColor': '#90CAF9'}}}%%
 mindmap
     root((Sweden Political&#x3C;br/>Threat Landscape&#x3C;br/>2026-04-22))
@@ -1867,7 +1867,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-overview">Political Threat Taxonomy Overvie
                 S+V+MP counter-motion coalition
                 Coordinated accountability offensive</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-analysis">Attack Tree Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-analysis">Attack Tree Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL["Opposition Goal: Force Government Accountability Crisis&#x3C;br/>Before September 2026 Election"]
 
@@ -1902,7 +1902,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-analysis">Attack Tree Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style A2a fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF
     style A3a fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain">Parliamentary Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain">Parliamentary Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1959,7 +1959,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parliamentary-accountability-chain">Parliamentary Accountability Chai
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Phase</th><th>Action</th><th>Actor</th><th>Status</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Evidence gathering</td><td>Identify Svantesson statements on atstorningsvard</td><td>S research</td><td>Complete</td><td>HD10442 references</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Obtain court ruling vindicating Region Stockholm</td><td>Legal research</td><td>Complete</td><td>HD10442 cites court case</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>File interpellation HD10442 with court documentation</td><td>Markus Kallifatides (S)</td><td><strong>Complete</strong> 2026-04-21</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Response forcing</td><td>Force parliamentary debate</td><td>Speaker scheduling</td><td>Pending (post-May 5)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Media escalation</td><td>Coverage of false statements</td><td>Swedish press</td><td>Pending</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral use</td><td>S uses answer in campaign materials</td><td>S party</td><td>Pending (election day)</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (P
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Procedure</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-001</td><td>Accountability</td><td>Court-documented accountability</td><td>File IP with court ruling as evidence — higher evidentiary standard than typical IP</td><td>HD10442 (riksdagen.se)</td></tr><tr><td>S-002</td><td>Dual-track positioning</td><td>Simultaneous support and opposition</td><td>Vote for measure in chamber while filing counter-motion</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote + HD024082</td></tr><tr><td>S-003</td><td>Coordinated offensive</td><td>Multi-minister targeting</td><td>File 5 IPs in 48 hours targeting 2 ministers</td><td>HD10442-HD10446</td></tr><tr><td>SD-001</td><td>Coalition support</td><td>Key vote solidarity</td><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48 alongside government</td><td>HD01FiU48 vote records</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-probability-assessment">Threat Probability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-probability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-probability-assessment">Threat Probability Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-probability-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2046,29 +2046,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-probability-assessment">Threat Probability Assessment<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Current State</th><th>Probability</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S successfully damages Svantesson in HD10442 IP debate</td><td>IP scheduled, court docs strong</td><td>Likely [B2] 65%</td><td>Post 2026-05-05</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S climate voters defect to MP/V due to HD01FiU48 Ja vote</td><td>Counter-motions + Ja vote contradiction</td><td>Possible [B3] 40%</td><td>By election 2026-09-13</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Social dumpning (HD10443) generates media investigation</td><td>Two S IPs on same theme</td><td>Possible [B3] 35%</td><td>2026-04 to 2026-05</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Government fiscal credibility challenged before June budget</td><td>4.1 GSEK + weak GDP</td><td>Unlikely [D4] 20%</td><td>2026-05 to 2026-06</td><td>[D4]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27">HD01CU27<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01CU27
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande CU27 — Civilutskottet bostadsrätt/hyresrätt reform
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande CU27 — Civilutskottet bostadsrätt/hyresrätt reform. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu28">HD01CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01CU28
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande CU28 — Civilutskottet bostadsrättslagen ändring
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande CU28 — Civilutskottet bostadsrättslagen ändring. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48
 <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (committee report — FiU)
 <strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 — bränsle och drivmedelsavgifter + energistöd
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <strong>Enacted</strong>: 2026-04-22 16:29 CET
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se enacted record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01FiU48 is the committee report on the government's extra ändringsbudget for 2026 addressing fuel and energy costs. The proposition HD03236 was the originating government bill. FiU voted to adopt the measure, and it was enacted by the chamber at 16:29 on 2026-04-22.</p>
 <p><strong>Key provisions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2085,7 +2085,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>Total budget impact: approximately 4.1 GSEK net</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-vote-record">Vote Record<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-record"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vote-record">Vote Record<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-record"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2139,35 +2139,35 @@ <h2 id="rm-vote-record">Vote Record<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Seats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Ja</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Ja</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>Ja</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Ja</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>Nej/Avstår</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Nej</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Nej</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Mixed</td><td>24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total Ja</strong>: ~267 seats (estimated). Majority: 175. Passed with significant supermajority.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-2">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-2">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: W (Warning) — Enacted measure immediately affects national budget and sets political precedent for cross-bloc cooperation.</p>
 <p><strong>Key analytical point</strong>: S participation was mathematically necessary for supermajority. S's 107 Ja votes added to M+SD+KD (160) = 267. Without S, government coalition alone at 160 would have passed with only bare majority (160 > 175 is false — actually 160 &#x3C; 175). S's votes were therefore pivotal to the political optics of broad consensus, even if legally the government had enough with SD included to reach 176 (M+SD+KD = 160 &#x3C; 175... actually M+SD+KD+L = 176 > 175). Clarification: The government bloc (M+SD+KD+L = 176) had enough without S. S's Ja vote was not mathematically required but was politically significant as a cross-bloc endorsement.</p>
 <p><strong>Corrected analysis</strong>: Government bloc (176) > 175 threshold. S participation was <strong>politically voluntary</strong> — not mathematically necessary. This makes S's decision MORE significant: they had the freedom to abstain or vote Nej, but chose Ja.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for vote record; [B2] for political significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU32
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande KU32 — Grundlagsändring medietillgänglighet (Stage 1)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande KU32 — Grundlagsändring medietillgänglighet (Stage 1). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-3">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-3">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01KU33
 <strong>Title</strong>: Betänkande KU33 — Grundlagsändring husrannsakan insyn (Stage 1)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Betänkande KU33 — Grundlagsändring husrannsakan insyn (Stage 1). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-4">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-4">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024082
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion
 <strong>Title</strong>: Följdmotion mot HD03236/HD01FiU48 — klimat och energiomställning
@@ -2176,13 +2176,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <strong>Committee referral</strong>: FiU / MJU (likely)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se motion record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>HD024082 is one of three parallel climate counter-motions filed by S, V, and MP respectively against the fuel tax cut measure (HD03236/HD01FiU48). S filed HD024082 while simultaneously voting Ja on HD01FiU48 in the chamber — creating the "dual-track contradiction" that is a central analytical finding.</p>
 <p><strong>S's position in this motion</strong>: Argues that the fuel tax cut is environmentally regressive and contrary to Sweden's climate commitments. Proposes alternative energy transition measures.</p>
 <p><strong>V's motion (HD024092)</strong>: Similar climate critique from left perspective.
 <strong>MP's motion (HD024098)</strong>: Green party opposition to fossil fuel subsidies.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis">Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis">Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-dual-track-contradiction-analysis">Dual-Track Contradiction Analysis<
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>S action</th><th>Date</th><th>Parliament record</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Filed HD024082 opposing fuel cut</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Voted Ja on HD01FiU48 enacting fuel cut</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>These two acts occurred on the same calendar day.</strong> This is documented in Riksdag records and cannot be contested.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-5">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-5">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — HD024082 is an indicator of S's internal strategic tensions between climate/environmental wing and rural/cost-of-living electoral bloc.</p>
 <p><strong>Long-term significance</strong>: The motion will be processed in committee (likely rejected with government majority). However, it will remain in the parliamentary record permanently, available for:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2216,62 +2216,62 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-5">Intelligence Significance<a class="" ari
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document facts; [B2] for strategic significance.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024090">HD024090<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024090"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024090
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion 2024/90 — Klimat och energiomställning (relaterad)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion 2024/90 — Klimat och energiomställning (relaterad). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-6">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-6">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024092">HD024092<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024092"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024092
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion V — Klimatmotion mot HD03236 (parallell till HD024082)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion V — Klimatmotion mot HD03236 (parallell till HD024082). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-7">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-7">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024095">HD024095<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024095"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024095
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion 2024/95 — Energipolitik
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion 2024/95 — Energipolitik. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-8">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-8">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024097">HD024097<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024097"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024097
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion 2024/97 — Energi och klimat
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion 2024/97 — Energi och klimat. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-9">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-9">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-9"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024098">HD024098<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024098"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024098
 <strong>Title</strong>: Motion MP — Miljöpartiet klimatmotion mot HD03236
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Motion MP — Miljöpartiet klimatmotion mot HD03236. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-10">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-10">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100
 <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition (Vårproposition 2026)
 <strong>Title</strong>: 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition
@@ -2279,7 +2279,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15 (approximate — vårproposition timing)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03100 is the 2026 Economic Spring Budget (Vårproposition). As a pre-election document, it sets the government's fiscal framework and public spending priorities for the upcoming election campaign period. Filed approximately 5 months before the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Key elements</strong> (synthesised from propositions sibling folder):</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2290,13 +2290,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Ukraine support framework (links to HD03232, HD03231)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment">Pre-Election Fiscal Manifesto Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment">Pre-Election Fiscal Manifesto Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-manifesto-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Vårproposition is a structural policy statement that anchors fiscal expectations for election campaign period.</p>
 <p><strong>Key intelligence value</strong>:
 The Vårproposition is the government's last major economic document before the election. It is effectively a political manifesto dressed as a budget document. The opposition (S) will use it as a contrast document in campaign messaging.</p>
 <p><strong>Analytical gap</strong>: Full text of HD03100 was not directly retrieved in this cycle. Summary derived from propositions sibling folder synthesis-summary.md. Marked as [B2] for derived assessment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strategic-significance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Locks in the fiscal baseline that any successor government inherits</li>
 <li>The 4.1 GSEK HD01FiU48 appropriation now embedded in this baseline</li>
@@ -2304,62 +2304,62 @@ <h2 id="rm-strategic-significance">Strategic Significance<a class="" aria-hidden
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B2] for content assessment (derived from sibling folder).</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03232">HD03232<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03232
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03232 — Sverige ansluter sig till ukrainskt skadeståndsregister
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03232 — Sverige ansluter sig till ukrainskt skadeståndsregister. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-11">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-11">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-11"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03236
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03236 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (source for HD01FiU48)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03236 — Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (source for HD01FiU48). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-12">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-12">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-12"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03239">HD03239<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03239"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03239
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03239 — Stärkt försörjningsberedskap inom energiområdet
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03239 — Stärkt försörjningsberedskap inom energiområdet. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-13">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-13">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-13"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03240
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD03240 — Nya elsystemlagar och energisäkerhetsramverk
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD03240 — Nya elsystemlagar och energisäkerhetsramverk. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-14">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-14">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-14"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd0399">HD0399<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd0399"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD0399
 <strong>Title</strong>: Prop HD0399 — Vårändringbudget 2026
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h3>
 <p>Prop HD0399 — Vårändringbudget 2026. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-15">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-15">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-15"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10442">HD10442<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10442
 <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation till statsråd om ätstörningar och ekonomisk prioritering
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10442">HD10442<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Svantesson (Finance), possibly also Health Minister
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se interpellation record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10442 is an interpellation to a government minister (Svantesson or Health Ministry) regarding eating disorders and fiscal prioritisation. The filing MP obtained court documentation as evidence — this elevates the interpellation from typical accountability question to documented legal record.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this matters</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>This creates campaign material: if Svantesson's answer is inadequate, S has documented evidence of ministerial failure on health/welfare priorities</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parliamentary-process">Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-process"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parliamentary-process">Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parliamentary-process"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2410,62 +2410,62 @@ <h2 id="rm-parliamentary-process">Parliamentary Process<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Status</th><th>Expected timing</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Filed</td><td>2026-04-21 ✅</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Admitted by Riksdag</td><td>Likely (standard IPs rarely rejected)</td><td>2026-04-22/23</td></tr><tr><td>Minister response scheduling</td><td>Pending</td><td>1–3 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Formal chamber debate</td><td>Pending</td><td>2–4 weeks</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-16">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-16">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-16"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: W (Warning) — The court documentation makes this interpellation uniquely persistent. Unlike most IPs that are answered perfunctorily, HD10442 creates a documented record that will outlast the parliamentary session.</p>
 <p><strong>Party accountability value for S</strong>: This is the highest-quality document in the interpellation cluster. The other 4 (HD10443-HD10446) are standard accountability questions. HD10442 with court documentation is qualitatively different.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document/filing facts; [B2] for strategic significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10443">HD10443<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10443
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10443 — Social dumpning (Svantesson)
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10443 — Social dumpning (Svantesson). Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-17">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-17">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-17"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10444">HD10444<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10444
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgifter bostadssektor
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgifter bostadssektor. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-18">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-18">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-18"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10445">HD10445<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10445
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10445 — Energikostnader hushåll
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10445 — Energikostnader hushåll. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-19">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-19">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-19"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10446">HD10446<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10446
 <strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation HD10446 — Uppföljning socialtjänst
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen.se document record</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation HD10446 — Uppföljning socialtjänst. Retrieved as part of Tier-C evening analysis cross-type synthesis 2026-04-22.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-20">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-20">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: I (Indicator) — Document included in evening synthesis cross-reference map.</p>
 <p>See parent analysis files for full significance assessment and cross-references.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] for document existence; [B3] for contextual significance assessment.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md + Kent Scale WEP
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days until election</strong>: ~144 days (election estimated September 2026)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-context">Seat Projection Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-context">Seat Projection Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Current Riksdag composition</strong> (349 seats):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Government (Tidökoalitionen): M + SD + KD + L ≈ 176 seats (bare majority)</li>
@@ -2483,8 +2483,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-context">Seat Projection Context<a class="" aria-hidd
     "MP (Miljöpartiet)" : 18
     "C (Centerpartiet)" : 24</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis">Today's Electoral Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis">Today's Electoral Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-impact-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2538,40 +2538,40 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut-electoral-dimension">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax C
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Vote</th><th>Electoral gain/loss</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Ja</td><td>Delivers promise to rural voters; reinforces economic competence narrative</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Ja</td><td>Core voter base (rural, transport-dependent) — HIGH benefit</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>Ja</td><td>Consistent with value-conservative + rural profile</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>Nej (likely)</td><td>Maintains environmental credibility with urban voter base</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Ja</td><td>CONTRADICTED by HD024082 counter-motion — dual-track risk</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Nej</td><td>Consistent with climate/urban profile</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Nej</td><td>Consistent with climate profile</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Mixed</td><td>Split between rural (pro) and liberal (con) wings — no clear read</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: It is <strong>Likely</strong> [60–70%] that S's Ja vote will improve their polling numbers among rural and transport-dependent voters in western and northern Sweden in Q3 2026. It is <strong>Roughly even</strong> [45–55%] that the counter-motion HD024082 will be used effectively against S in the election campaign.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension">HD10442-HD10446 — Interpellation Offensive (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension">HD10442-HD10446 — Interpellation Offensive (Electoral Dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442-hd10446--interpellation-offensive-electoral-dimension"></a></h4>
 <p>The S accountability offensive targeting Svantesson (Finance), housing minister, and social minister is a classic pre-election positioning move. The eating disorder court documentation in HD10442 demonstrates opposition research capacity.</p>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: It is <strong>Very likely</strong> [75–90%] that these interpellations will generate campaign material for S. The court documentation in HD10442 means the issue cannot be dismissed as political theatre.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026">Coalition Scenario Analysis (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority">Scenario A: Government coalition wins (Tidökoalitionen majority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026">Coalition Scenario Analysis (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-analysis-election-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority">Scenario A: Government coalition wins (Tidökoalitionen majority)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-government-coalition-wins-tidökoalitionen-majority"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~35% (based on current trends)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires SD to maintain ~20% polling</li>
 <li>M to consolidate centre-right vote share</li>
 <li>Key indicator: Fuel tax cut voter credit (→ SD/M benefit)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support">Scenario B: S-led government with V+MP support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support">Scenario B: S-led government with V+MP support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-government-with-vmp-support"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~40% (slight S polling advantage)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>S at ~32% in most polls (post-vårproposition period)</li>
 <li>V+MP above 4% threshold both needed</li>
 <li>Key risk: S dual-track strategy may alienate environmental progressive flank</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure">Scenario C: Hung parliament / Grand coalition pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure">Scenario C: Hung parliament / Grand coalition pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-hung-parliament--grand-coalition-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~20%</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Neither bloc at 175+</li>
 <li>C acting as kingmaker from centre</li>
 <li>Constitutional reform (HD01KU32/KU33) could influence rules for minority government</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september">Scenario D: Snap election before September<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september">Scenario D: Snap election before September<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-snap-election-before-september"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: ~5%</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Only if government loses confidence vote on budgetary grounds</li>
 <li>HD01FiU48 passage with cross-party majority actually REDUCES this risk</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days">Election Countdown Indicators (144 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days">Election Countdown Indicators (144 days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2609,13 +2609,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-countdown-indicators-144-days">Election Countdown Indicators
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Current Status</th><th>Expected development</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S polling position</td><td>~32%</td><td>Likely stable if fuel tax cut credit holds</td></tr><tr><td>SD polling position</td><td>~19-21%</td><td>Dependent on migration narrative + fuel cut credit</td></tr><tr><td>Election date confirmation</td><td>Not formally announced</td><td>Expected Q1 2026 formal call</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag reform impact</td><td>Stage 1 (KU32/33)</td><td>Too late for 2026 election cycle effect</td></tr><tr><td>Budget baseline</td><td>4.1 GSEK deterioration</td><td>May require austerity framing after election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Coalition Mathematics
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Key data</strong>: HD01FiU48 vote record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag">Current Seat Distribution (2025/26 Riksdag)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag">Current Seat Distribution (2025/26 Riksdag)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-202526-riksdag">Current Seat Distribution (
 <p><strong>Government majority</strong>: M+SD+KD+L = 176 seats (≥175 needed)
 <strong>Opposition</strong>: S+V+MP+C = 173 seats</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis">HD01FiU48 Vote Record — Pivotal Coalition Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis">HD01FiU48 Vote Record — Pivotal Coalition Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2741,7 +2741,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-record--pivotal-coalition-analysis">HD01FiU48 Vote Rec
 <strong>Nej/Avstår</strong>: ~82 seats (L+V+MP+ some C)</p>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: The government bloc (M+SD+KD+L = 176) already exceeded the 175-seat majority threshold without S's votes. S's participation was therefore <strong>politically voluntary, not mathematically necessary</strong>. Without L (if L voted Nej), government would have been M+SD+KD = 160 — then S's participation would be necessary. As stated, S had full freedom to oppose; their deliberate Ja vote reflects electoral calculation, not parliamentary obligation. The resulting ~267-seat supermajority amplifies the political signal: S chose to cross the aisle.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation">Sainte-Laguë Scenario Table (for reference — election 2026 simulation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation">Sainte-Laguë Scenario Table (for reference — election 2026 simulation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation"></a></h3>
 <p>Using approximate current poll averages (April 2026):</p>
 
 
@@ -2807,7 +2807,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-scenario-table-for-reference--election-2026-simulation"
 <li>S + C + V + MP = 181 = majority → viable S-led government with C support</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     SBL["S-bloc (S+V+MP)&#x3C;br/>~153 seats (simulated)&#x3C;br/>INSUFFICIENT alone"]
@@ -2825,7 +2825,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" ari
     style MAJ1 fill:#8B0000,color:#FFFFFF
     style MAJ2 fill:#003580,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-mathematical-finding">Key Mathematical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-mathematical-finding"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-mathematical-finding">Key Mathematical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-mathematical-finding"></a></h3>
 <p>The HD01FiU48 cross-party majority (M+SD+KD+S) is <strong>constitutionally and electorally significant</strong> because:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>It demonstrates S can cooperate on budget issues across the bloc divide</li>
@@ -2834,12 +2834,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-mathematical-finding">Key Mathematical Finding<a class="" aria-hi
 </ol>
 <p><strong>WEP</strong>: It is <strong>Unlikely</strong> [15–25%] that L would formally withdraw from the government coalition over this single vote. However, it is <strong>Likely</strong> [60–70%] that L will emphasise its Nej vote in campaign materials as environmental credibility marker.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Voter Segmentation
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut">Segment Impact Matrix — HD01FiU48 (Fuel Tax Cut)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut">Segment Impact Matrix — HD01FiU48 (Fuel Tax Cut)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2901,7 +2901,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-impact-matrix--hd01fiu48-fuel-tax-cut">Segment Impact Matrix
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size est.</th><th>Impact of HD01FiU48</th><th>Likely primary beneficiary party</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural households (>50km from city)</td><td>~15% of electorate</td><td>HIGH — direct fuel cost savings</td><td>SD, M, S (rural)</td></tr><tr><td>Commuters >30km (car-dependent)</td><td>~20%</td><td>HIGH — daily saving</td><td>SD, M</td></tr><tr><td>Urban non-car households</td><td>~25%</td><td>LOW — marginal benefit</td><td>V, MP, L (urban)</td></tr><tr><td>Small businesses (transport)</td><td>~5%</td><td>HIGH — operational cost relief</td><td>M, KD</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-concerned voters</td><td>~15%</td><td>NEGATIVE — fossil fuel subsidy</td><td>MP, V, C (green wing)</td></tr><tr><td>Low-income households (fuel-dependent)</td><td>~10%</td><td>HIGH — regressive relief actually progressive for this group</td><td>S, SD</td></tr><tr><td>Agricultural sector</td><td>~2%</td><td>HIGH — diesel relief applies</td><td>SD, C, M</td></tr><tr><td>Pensioners (rural, fixed income)</td><td>~8%</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>SD, KD, S</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-geographic-segmentation">Geographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-geographic-segmentation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-geographic-segmentation">Geographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-geographic-segmentation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#006AA7', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     N["Northern Sweden&#x3C;br/>Norrland&#x3C;br/>HIGH fuel dependency&#x3C;br/>S+SD strongholds&#x3C;br/>Clear HD01FiU48 benefit"]
@@ -2917,7 +2917,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-geographic-segmentation">Geographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidd
     style E fill:#0288D1,color:#FFFFFF
     style S fill:#FFD700,color:#000000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact">Interpellation Offensive — Voter Segment Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact">Interpellation Offensive — Voter Segment Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2961,7 +2961,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-interpellation-offensive--voter-segment-impact">Interpellation Offens
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>IP (dok_id)</th><th>Issue</th><th>Target segment</th><th>S positioning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10442 (eating disorders + Svantesson)</td><td>Health system / fiscal priority</td><td>Middle-class families, women voters</td><td>"We hold government accountable on welfare"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443 (social dumping)</td><td>Labour market</td><td>Union households, LO-affiliated voters</td><td>"We protect Swedish workers"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444 (housing waiting times)</td><td>Young households</td><td>Urban young voters</td><td>"Government has failed on housing"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445 (energy costs)</td><td>Energy transition</td><td>Rural, pensioners</td><td>"We will ensure affordable energy"</td></tr><tr><td>HD10446 (follow-up unknown)</td><td>—</td><td>Broad</td><td>Accountability continuity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-segmentation-finding">Key Segmentation Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segmentation-finding"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-segmentation-finding">Key Segmentation Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segmentation-finding"></a></h3>
 <p>The critical voter segment is <strong>rural S-leaning voters</strong> (traditional social democrat base that has drifted to SD). Today's events create a complex picture for this group:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 Ja vote from S = direct benefit signal</li>
@@ -2970,16 +2970,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-segmentation-finding">Key Segmentation Finding<a class="" aria-hi
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net assessment</strong>: The fuel cut Ja vote is likely more electorally legible to this segment than the technical counter-motion. S has calculated correctly that the visible action (Ja vote) outweighs the insider opposition (committee motion). <strong>Likelihood this segment returns to S</strong>: Unlikely to Very Unlikely without additional signal; HD01FiU48 Ja vote is necessary but not sufficient. Admiralty: [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: comparative-international.md template
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Comparator set</strong>: Norway, Finland, Germany (Nordic + EU minimum requirement)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Norway (NO), Finland (FI), Germany (DE) — all Nordic/EU neighbours facing similar energy policy and fiscal dilemmas in 2025–2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context">Comparative Analysis: Fuel Tax Policy (HD01FiU48 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context">Comparative Analysis: Fuel Tax Policy (HD01FiU48 Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     SWE["Sweden (SE)&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48 enacted 2026-04-22&#x3C;br/>Fuel tax cut 82 öre/liter&#x3C;br/>Budget impact: -4.1 GSEK"]
@@ -2996,7 +2996,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-analysis-fuel-tax-policy-hd01fiu48-context">Comparative A
     style FIN fill:#003580,color:#FFFFFF
     style GER fill:#000000,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table">Jurisdiction Comparison Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table">Jurisdiction Comparison Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3044,18 +3044,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-jurisdiction-comparison-table">Jurisdiction Comparison Table<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Measure</th><th>Duration</th><th>Fiscal Cost</th><th>Political Outcome</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden 2026</td><td>HD01FiU48 — fuel tax cut 82 öre/l petrol</td><td>May–Sep 2026 (5 months)</td><td>4.1 GSEK</td><td>Cross-party adoption; S votes Ja</td><td>[A1] riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Norway 2022–23</td><td>Temporary petrol tax reduction</td><td>~12 months</td><td>~10 BNOK</td><td>Reversed 2024; minor electoral impact</td><td>[B2] SSB/Government reports</td></tr><tr><td>Finland 2022</td><td>Temporary fuel excise cut</td><td>6 months</td><td>~500 MEUR</td><td>Criticised by climate council; not renewed</td><td>[B2] Finnish gov. sources</td></tr><tr><td>Germany 2022</td><td>Tankrabatt fuel subsidy</td><td>3 months (Jun–Aug 2022)</td><td>~3.15 BEUR</td><td>Limited consumer impact; SPD-Greens coalition friction</td><td>[B2] Bundesministerium der Finanzen</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lesson from Norway</strong>: Norway's 2022–23 fuel tax reduction was ~2.5× larger than Sweden's (relative to GDP) and was reversed when energy prices normalised. Swedish policymakers should plan explicit sunset conditions beyond the stated May–September 2026 window to avoid politically painful renewal discussions in an election year.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson from Finland</strong>: The Finnish Climate Council's formal criticism created lasting narrative damage on climate credibility even though the measure was temporary. S filing counter-motions (HD024082/092/098) serves the same function domestically — creating a permanent record of opposition for campaign use.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson from Germany</strong>: Germany's Tankrabatt had limited consumer pass-through (fuel stations kept much of the benefit). Swedish policymakers have not publicly addressed pass-through risk for HD01FiU48. This is an EEI gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Sweden-specific factors not present in comparators</strong>: Sweden has an election in 5 months; none of the comparators faced election-year timing. This amplifies both the political benefit (electoral optics) and the political risk (being held accountable if benefits are not felt by voters).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Historical Parallels
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009">Precedent 1: Cross-Bloc Fiscal Emergency Measures (2008–2009)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009">Precedent 1: Cross-Bloc Fiscal Emergency Measures (2008–2009)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: During the global financial crisis (2008–2009), Sweden's centre-right Alliansregering passed several emergency fiscal measures with tacit S support in key Riksdag votes to stabilise the economy ahead of the 2010 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity to HD01FiU48</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3066,7 +3066,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-precedent-1-cross-bloc-fiscal-emergency-measures-20082009">Precedent
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: In 2008–09 the external shock (global crisis) provided cover for cross-party cooperation. In 2026, the "external shock" justification is weaker — energy prices have moderated from 2022 peaks. This makes the cross-party majority more politically conscious and therefore more strategically significant.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — based on public records of 2008–09 Riksdag proceedings; structural comparison drawn by analyst.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022">Precedent 2: S Dual-Track Strategy — The LAS Compromise (2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022">Precedent 2: S Dual-Track Strategy — The LAS Compromise (2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: In 2022, S simultaneously supported LAS (lagen om anställningsskydd) reform as part of the Tidö negotiations while the S party apparatus formally opposed the reform trajectory through affiliated union lobbying. This created a similar dual-track pattern.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity to HD024082 + HD01FiU48 Ja vote</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3077,12 +3077,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-precedent-2-s-dual-track-strategy--the-las-compromise-2022">Precedent
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: The LAS dual-track was between parliament (formal vote) and union structures (informal influence). The 2026 dual-track is entirely within parliament (committee motion vs. chamber vote) — making the contradiction more visible in Riksdag records.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2] — LAS compromise is extensively documented in Swedish parliamentary record.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history">Precedent 3: Fuel Tax Reduction Reversal Risk — Swedish Fuel Tax History<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history">Precedent 3: Fuel Tax Reduction Reversal Risk — Swedish Fuel Tax History<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-3-fuel-tax-reduction-reversal-risk--swedish-fuel-tax-history"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: Sweden introduced the current fuel tax framework under Alliansen 2011–2012. A temporary fuel duty freeze in 2014–2015 was later partially reversed. The pattern of temporary measures becoming permanent political commitments is documented.</p>
 <p><strong>Relevance to HD01FiU48</strong>: The May–September 2026 sunset clause for the fuel tax cut will face political pressure to extend post-election, regardless of which party forms government. This is a structural fiscal risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — based on Riksdag legislative record (public).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014">Precedent 4: Interpellation Offensive as Pre-Election Signal (2013–2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014">Precedent 4: Interpellation Offensive as Pre-Election Signal (2013–2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel</strong>: S filed a similar concentrated interpellation campaign in 2013–2014 targeting the Alliansregering in the months before the 2014 election, including specific accountability questions about fiscal priorities and social spending. S won the 2014 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3093,7 +3093,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-precedent-4-interpellation-offensive-as-pre-election-signal-20132014"
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: In 2013–14, S had a single coherent message. In 2026, S's simultaneous Ja vote on fuel tax cut creates message complexity — the opposition wants accountability AND credit for relief. The dual-track makes the narrative more complex than 2013–14.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2] — 2013–14 interpellation record is public; electoral analysis draws on published research.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-pattern-summary">Historical Pattern Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-pattern-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-pattern-summary">Historical Pattern Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-pattern-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 timeline
     title Swedish Parliamentary Historical Parallels
@@ -3111,12 +3111,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-pattern-summary">Historical Pattern Summary<a class="" ari
               : 2026 election outcome TBD</pre>
 <p><strong>Analyst Note</strong>: The 2022 precedent (S LAS dual-track → election defeat) is the most structurally similar to today's pattern. Whether the outcome repeats depends on whether S can disambiguate the message before September 2026. Admiralty: [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md § Implementation Feasibility
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3180,8 +3180,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Measure</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Legal basis</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Risk</th><th>Pass-through risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut 82 öre/liter petrol</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Enacted 2026-04-22</td><td>May–Sep 2026</td><td>LOW — legally enacted</td><td>MEDIUM (retail fuel pricing)</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel tax cut diesel</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Same</td><td>May–Sep 2026</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Energy support (households)</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Same</td><td>Delivery via Energimyndigheten</td><td>MEDIUM — administrative</td><td>LOW (direct payments)</td></tr><tr><td>Vårproposition fiscal framework</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Cabinet approved</td><td>Budget 2027 process</td><td>LOW — framework document</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability (Hague)</td><td>HD03232+HD03231</td><td>International treaty</td><td>Multi-year</td><td>LOW — treaty ratification</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Grundlag reform Stage 1</td><td>HD01KU32+HD01KU33</td><td>Two-stage constitutional</td><td>Elections required</td><td>HIGH — two-Riksdag rule</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-delivery-risk-assessment">Delivery Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-delivery-risk-assessment">Delivery Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal status</strong>: ENACTED 2026-04-22 — legally effective. No remaining approval hurdles.</p>
 <p><strong>Delivery pathway</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -3191,16 +3191,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--fuel-tax-cut">HD01FiU48 — Fuel Tax Cut<a class="" aria-h
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Key risk</strong>: Fuel station pass-through. Evidence from Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt showed ~30% of the subsidy was not passed through to consumers. Swedish Competition Authority (Konkurrensverket) monitoring would be needed to ensure pass-through.</p>
 <p><strong>WEP on effective delivery</strong>: It is <strong>Likely</strong> [60–70%] that fuel stations will pass through at least 70% of the reduction. It is <strong>Unlikely</strong> [20–30%] that the full 82 öre/liter reduction will be consistently visible at the pump.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03100--vårproposition">HD03100 — Vårproposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100--vårproposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03100--vårproposition">HD03100 — Vårproposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100--vårproposition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal status</strong>: Government bill — now in Riksdag budget committee process.</p>
 <p><strong>Delivery pathway</strong>: Standard budget cycle. Vårproposition informs Budget 2027 (höstpropostion). No legislative risk at this stage.</p>
 <p><strong>Key risk</strong>: Post-election government may revise HD03100 framework. Pre-election budget commitments are not binding on successor governments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform">HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — Grundlag Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform">HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — Grundlag Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32--hd01ku33--grundlag-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Legal status</strong>: Stage 1 (first-reading) — 2 of 2 required Riksdag decisions needed.</p>
 <p><strong>Delivery pathway</strong>: Must pass second reading after intervening election (September 2026). Only effective if same parties support it after election.</p>
 <p><strong>Key risk</strong>: HIGH — constitutional reform requires continuity of political will across elections. If September 2026 election changes Riksdag composition significantly, reform may stall.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-administrative-capacity-assessment">Administrative Capacity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-capacity-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-administrative-capacity-assessment">Administrative Capacity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-capacity-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3233,17 +3233,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-administrative-capacity-assessment">Administrative Capacity Assessmen
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Implementing body</th><th>Measure</th><th>Capacity status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Skatteverket</td><td>Fuel tax cut</td><td>HIGH — routine tax rate change, well-within administrative capacity</td></tr><tr><td>Energimyndigheten</td><td>Energy support</td><td>MEDIUM — depends on distribution mechanism design</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank</td><td>Macro monitoring</td><td>Ongoing — no new administrative requirement</td></tr><tr><td>Konkurrensverket</td><td>Pass-through monitoring</td><td>LOW — not formally mandated for this measure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-summary">Feasibility Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-summary">Feasibility Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HD01FiU48 is administratively straightforward</strong> — the primary risk is consumer pass-through. <strong>Grundlag reform is feasible but election-dependent</strong> — high political risk despite legal clarity. <strong>Vårproposition is sound framework</strong> but pre-election in nature.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty overall</strong>: [A1] for legal status, [B3] for effective delivery confidence.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ACH matrix + Red Team challenge
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix">Competing Hypotheses (ACH Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support">Hypothesis H1: S's HD01FiU48 Ja Vote was Genuine Policy Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix">Competing Hypotheses (ACH Matrix)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support">Hypothesis H1: S's HD01FiU48 Ja Vote was Genuine Policy Support<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The Socialdemokraterna voted for HD01FiU48 because they genuinely believe fuel tax relief is the right policy response to high energy costs — not as a purely electoral calculation.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H1</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3259,7 +3259,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-ss-hd01fiu48-ja-vote-was-genuine-policy-support">Hypoth
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH judgment</strong>: H1 is UNLIKELY. The simultaneous evidence of both opposition motion and Ja vote in same party makes genuine policy conviction implausible. Admiry: [B2].</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated">Hypothesis H2: S Accountability Offensive is Opportunistic, Not Strategically Coordinated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated">Hypothesis H2: S Accountability Offensive is Opportunistic, Not Strategically Coordinated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strategically-coordinated"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 5 interpellations in 48 hours are not a coordinated strategy but individually motivated by specific constituency or committee interests.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H2</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3275,7 +3275,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-s-accountability-offensive-is-opportunistic-not-strateg
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH judgment</strong>: H2 is UNLIKELY. Coordination is the more parsimonious explanation. Admiralty: [B2].</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk">Hypothesis H3: HD01FiU48 Budget Deterioration is Fiscally Manageable Without Election-Year Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk">Hypothesis H3: HD01FiU48 Budget Deterioration is Fiscally Manageable Without Election-Year Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-without-election-year-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 4.1 GSEK budget deterioration from HD01FiU48 is easily absorbed within Sweden's fiscal framework and poses no meaningful election-year risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H3</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd01fiu48-budget-deterioration-is-fiscally-manageable-w
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH judgment</strong>: H3 is POSSIBLE but requires monitoring. The fiscal framework is robust; the risk is political not structural. Admiralty: [B3].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Red Team position</strong>: The mainstream analysis overestimates the significance of S's dual-track strategy. From a voter perspective, most Swedish citizens do not follow parliamentary procedural details (committee motions vs. chamber votes). S will simply claim credit for the relief in the election campaign, and voters will not know about the counter-motion.</p>
 <p><strong>Red Team argument</strong>: The analytical conclusion that S faces a "contradiction" is an insider view. Outside Parliament, S messaging will simply be "we made sure you got the fuel tax cut." The motion is a niche policy insider document; the vote record is the public-facing fact.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment of Red Team challenge</strong>: PARTIALLY VALID. The dual-track contradiction matters primarily for:
@@ -3301,7 +3301,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 (c) Political analysts
 It does NOT matter for the median voter unfamiliar with committee motions. This narrows the risk from S's perspective. Revised confidence on electoral damage risk: from HIGH to MEDIUM. [B2→C3 for general voter impact]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses">Rejected Alternative Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses">Rejected Alternative Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3325,12 +3325,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-rejected-alternative-hypotheses">Rejected Alternative Hypotheses<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Why Rejected</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S filed counter-motions to keep HD024082/092/098 in committee, not as public opposition</td><td>Motions are public record; cannot be "hidden" in committee — filed against riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Svantesson proactively prepared response to HD10442 before filing</td><td>IP was filed 2026-04-21; debate not yet scheduled — no public response available [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD voted Ja on HD01FiU48 under government pressure rather than genuine support</td><td>SD consistently supports fuel cost relief; no evidence of coercion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: political-classification-guide.md (7-dimension classification per document)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-overview">Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-overview">Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'primaryTextColor': '#FFFFFF', 'background': '#0a0e27'}}}%%
 pie title Document Priority Tier Distribution
     "Tier 1 — Critical (>9.0 DIW)" : 2
@@ -3339,7 +3339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-overview">Classification Overview<a class="" aria-hidd
     "Tier 4 — Medium (5.0–6.9 DIW)" : 12
     "Tier 5 — Standard (&#x3C;5.0 DIW)" : 28</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document">7-Dimension Classification Per Key Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document">7-Dimension Classification Per Key Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3490,7 +3490,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-per-key-document">7-Dimension Classificati
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Policy</th><th>Party</th><th>Stage</th><th>Impact</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Scope</th><th>GDPR basis</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Fiscal emergency relief</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Enacted/Law</td><td>9</td><td>Immediate</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Macroeconomic/Fiscal</td><td>M-led coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>9</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Fiscal/Budget</td><td>M-led coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>8</td><td>Immediate</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Healthcare/Accountability</td><td>S (IP to M)</td><td>Filed/Pending answer</td><td>8</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Regional→National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Energy/Electricity system</td><td>KD/L coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>8</td><td>Medium-term</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Foreign policy/Ukraine</td><td>M coalition</td><td>Submitted/Active</td><td>8</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>International</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Constitutional/Grundlag</td><td>M coalition</td><td>First reading</td><td>8</td><td>Long-cycle</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>Fiscal/Climate opposition</td><td>S</td><td>Filed/Motion</td><td>8</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>Housing/Segregation</td><td>S (IP to KD)</td><td>Filed/Pending answer</td><td>8</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Urban</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Property/Crime prevention</td><td>M coalition</td><td>Enacted</td><td>7</td><td>Immediate</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Energy/Wind power</td><td>KD/L coalition</td><td>Submitted</td><td>7</td><td>Medium-term</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional/Media</td><td>M coalition</td><td>First reading</td><td>8</td><td>Long-cycle</td><td>National</td><td>Art.9(2)(e) public</td><td>3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-retention-and-access-classification">Retention and Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-and-access-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention-and-access-classification">Retention and Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-and-access-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3523,13 +3523,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention-and-access-classification">Retention and Access Classificat
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Classification</th><th>Count</th><th>Access</th><th>Retention</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Public — Primary source (riksdagen.se)</td><td>56</td><td>Unrestricted</td><td>Permanent</td></tr><tr><td>Public — Derived analysis (AI-generated)</td><td>23</td><td>Unrestricted</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>Special category — Political opinions</td><td>56</td><td>GDPR Art.9(2)(e) basis</td><td>5 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>GDPR Note</strong>: All documents analysed are publicly filed parliamentary documents. Political opinions expressed therein are Art. 9(2)(e) (manifestly made public by data subjects). Analysis products are Art. 9(2)(g) (substantial public interest — democratic accountability). No personal profiling beyond publicly declared political positions.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Tier-C cross-type synthesis + structural-metadata-methodology.md
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Cross-reference of all 4 sibling analysis folders + prior evening cycle</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry">Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry">Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3573,7 +3573,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tier-c-sibling-folder-registry">Tier-C Sibling Folder Registry<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Path</th><th>Key Artifact</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>committeeReports</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/</code></td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; HD01KU32/33 grundlag</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>interpellations</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/</code></td><td>HD10442-HD10446 S offensive</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>motions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/</code></td><td>HD024082/092/098 climate counter-motions</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>propositions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/</code></td><td>HD03100 vårproposition; HD03236 extra budget</td><td>9/23 artifacts</td></tr><tr><td>Prior evening</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/</code></td><td>PIR-1 through PIR-7 prior cycle</td><td>Merged</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-matrix">Document Cross-Reference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-matrix">Document Cross-Reference Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3734,8 +3734,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-matrix">Document Cross-Reference Matrix<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>type</th><th align="center">committeeReports</th><th align="center">interpellations</th><th align="center">motions</th><th align="center">propositions</th><th align="center">evening-analysis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>bet</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (lead story)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (source)</td><td align="center">✅ (enacted origin)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (energy relief)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (Svantesson accountability)</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>ip</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>mot</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (central)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (dual-track contradiction)</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>mot</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>mot</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>bet</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (grundlag)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>bet</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅ (grundlag)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅ (Ukraine accountability)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>prop</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">✅</td><td align="center">✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference">Thematic Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread">Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-cross-reference">Thematic Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread">Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: HD03100 (vårproposition), HD03236 (extra budget source)</li>
 <li><strong>committeeReports</strong>: HD01FiU48 (enacted)</li>
@@ -3743,24 +3743,24 @@ <h3 id="rm-theme-1-fiscal-policy-primary-thread">Theme 1: Fiscal Policy (Primary
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: HD10442-HD10446 (accountability response)</li>
 <li><strong>Evening synthesis</strong>: All 4 pillars converge → cross-party fiscal supermajority + S dual-track is today's main story</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread">Theme 2: Constitutional (Secondary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread">Theme 2: Constitutional (Secondary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-constitutional-secondary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>committeeReports</strong>: HD01KU32 + HD01KU33 — two simultaneous grundlag first readings (KU)</li>
 <li><strong>Evening synthesis</strong>: constitutional reform at Stage 1; cross-reference with election 2026 analysis</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread">Theme 3: International/Ukraine (Tertiary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread">Theme 3: International/Ukraine (Tertiary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-internationalukraine-tertiary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: HD03232 + HD03231 — Sweden joins Ukraine accountability frameworks</li>
 <li><strong>Evening synthesis</strong>: cross-reference with forward-indicators.md</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread">Theme 4: Opposition Accountability Offensive (Quaternary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread">Theme 4: Opposition Accountability Offensive (Quaternary thread)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-opposition-accountability-offensive-quaternary-thread"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: HD10442-HD10446 — S targets Svantesson + housing/social ministers</li>
 <li><strong>evening-analysis</strong>: synthesis of coordinated opposition strategy</li>
 <li><strong>No sibling overlap</strong>: interpellations folder is the sole data source</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent">PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent">PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3808,13 +3808,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-continuity-map-priorcurrent">PIR Continuity Map (Prior→Current)
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior PIR (2026-04-21)</th><th>Status Today</th><th>Current Evening Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1 Vårproposition fiscal stance</td><td>ADVANCED</td><td>HD03100 now confirmed pre-election fiscal manifesto; HD01FiU48 enacted strengthens conclusion</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2 Coalition stability</td><td>ADVANCED</td><td>Anomalous M+SD+S+KD majority on HD01FiU48 = new data point; government coalition still solid</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3 SD electoral positioning</td><td>UNCHANGED</td><td>No new SD-specific documents today</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4 Ukraine/foreign policy</td><td>ADVANCED</td><td>HD03232+HD03231 provide new evidence of Sweden's international commitments</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5 Municipal/regional</td><td>UNCHANGED</td><td>No new municipal docs today</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6 Grundlag/constitutional reform</td><td>ADVANCING</td><td>HD01KU32+HD01KU33 Stage-1 readings = concrete progress</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7 Election campaign postures</td><td>CRITICAL ADVANCE</td><td>S dual-track strategy + interpellation offensive = multi-vector campaign evidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Reflection ID</strong>: MR-2026-04-22-EVE001
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: osint-tradecraft-standards.md, ai-driven-analysis-guide.md
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment">Evidence Sufficiency Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment">Evidence Sufficiency Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Total documents in scope</strong>: 56 (20 primary + 36 via cross-reference)
 <strong>Documents with full text</strong>: 20 (HD01FiU48, HD10442-HD10446, HD03100, HD03232, HD03240, others via sibling folders)
 <strong>Metadata-only</strong>: 20 motions (HD024079–HD024098) — acceptable for strategic-level analysis</p>
@@ -3825,7 +3825,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency-assessment">Evidence Sufficiency Assessment<a cl
 <li>HD10442 exact Svantesson statements not available — IP text describes them as false per court ruling</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Level</th><th>Count</th><th>%</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Confirmed [A1]</td><td>35</td><td>63%</td><td>Direct primary source, confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Probably true [B2]</td><td>12</td><td>21%</td><td>Strong inference from multiple sources</td></tr><tr><td>Possibly true [B3]</td><td>7</td><td>13%</td><td>Single source or inference only</td></tr><tr><td>Cannot be judged [C3]</td><td>2</td><td>4%</td><td>Insufficient evidence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Target distribution</strong>: >60% A1/B2 — ✅ ACHIEVED (84%)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-source-diversity-assessment">Source Diversity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-diversity-assessment">Source Diversity Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3898,7 +3898,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-source-diversity-assessment">Source Diversity Assessment<a class="" a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source type</th><th>Count</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdagen.se (vote records, documents)</td><td>40</td><td>71%</td></tr><tr><td>regeringen.se</td><td>10</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>3</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Sibling folder analyses (cross-type)</td><td>4</td><td>7%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>P0/P1 claims</strong> all use multiple independent sources from riksdagen.se + vote record (HD01FiU48 CE14CCEF). Single-source claims flagged with [unconfirmed] where noted.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3952,7 +3952,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party coverage</th><th>Documents citing</th><th>Narratives per party</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td>8 docs</td><td>Both achievement (HD03100/FiU48) and accountability exposure (HD10442)</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>2 docs</td><td>Noted vote alignment, no editorial judgment</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>12 docs</td><td>Both strategy analysis (dual-track) and legitimate accountability role</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>4 docs</td><td>Policy achievements (Britz wind/energy)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>2 docs</td><td>Edholm co-signature on HD03236</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>2 docs</td><td>Partial motion HD024095 on utvisning</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>3 docs</td><td>Opposition motions documented without editorial judgment</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>4 docs</td><td>Climate opposition documented factually</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Balance check</strong>: All 8 parties represented. No party assigned uniform positive or negative framing. ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4010,19 +4010,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 Standard</th><th>Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Sourcing — Every claim cites primary source</td><td>✅</td><td>All key claims cite dok_id or riksdagen.se URL</td></tr><tr><td>2. Uncertainty — Probability language consistent with confidence</td><td>✅</td><td>WEP language used: "Likely", "Probable", "Possible", "Remote"</td></tr><tr><td>3. Analytic tradecraft — SAT applied</td><td>✅</td><td>ACH in devils-advocate.md; scenario analysis; red team</td></tr><tr><td>4. Consistency — No contradictions across artifacts</td><td>✅</td><td>Cross-artifact review completed</td></tr><tr><td>5. Objectivity — No advocacy</td><td>✅</td><td>Party neutrality arithmetic passed</td></tr><tr><td>6. Timeliness — Analysis reflects current events</td><td>✅</td><td>Based on same-day data (HD01FiU48 voted today)</td></tr><tr><td>7. Proper use of sources — No misrepresentation</td><td>✅</td><td>All citations checked against original documents</td></tr><tr><td>8. Visual communication — Mermaid diagrams present</td><td>✅</td><td>≥1 per core synthesis file</td></tr><tr><td>9. Review — Pass 2 completed</td><td>✅</td><td>All files reviewed and improved</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time vote data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time vote data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-vote-data-integration"></a></h4>
 <p>The FiU48 vote record (CE14CCEF) was available but grouped party-level data was API-sync-delayed. Future runs should wait 2 hours post-vote for party-level data before finalising significance scoring. This would improve confidence from [B2] to [A1] on vote analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database">Improvement 2: IP scheduling database<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database">Improvement 2: IP scheduling database<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-ip-scheduling-database"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellation scheduling (when debates occur) is critical for assessing accountability risk timelines. A persistent PIR tracker mapping IP dok_id → scheduled debate date would improve lead-time on ministerial accountability scenarios. Recommend populating analysis/data/ip-tracker.json with scheduled dates.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness">Improvement 3: Cross-type synthesis completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness">Improvement 3: Cross-type synthesis completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-cross-type-synthesis-completeness"></a></h4>
 <p>Today's sibling folders (committeeReports, interpellations, motions, propositions) each had 9 of 23 required artifacts — partial analyses. Evening analysis had to reconstruct full intelligence from these partial inputs. If sibling folder analyses were complete (all 23), evening synthesis quality would improve significantly. Flag incomplete sibling analyses as a data quality issue.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency">Improvement 4: WEP language consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency">Improvement 4: WEP language consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-wep-language-consistency"></a></h4>
 <p>Some artifacts used "probable" (not in canonical WEP 7-band list per political-style-guide.md). Canonical WEP bands are: Almost certain / Very likely / Likely / Roughly even / Unlikely / Very unlikely / Remote. Replace "probable" with "Likely" in next cycle.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance">Improvement 5: SAT catalog compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance">Improvement 5: SAT catalog compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5-sat-catalog-compliance"></a></h4>
 <p>This run used: Scenario Analysis, ACH, Red Team, Hypothesis Testing, SWOT, TOWS, Evidence Scoring. Total: 7 techniques. Target: ≥10 named SAT techniques. Add for next cycle: Structured Self-Critique, Key Assumptions Check (explicit table), Indicators and Warning analysis, Premortem Analysis.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-evening-analysis
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24808228341
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-22T23:40:00Z
@@ -4031,7 +4031,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>MCP Server</strong>: riksdag-regering (live, confirmed at 23:38:58Z)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~144 days (September 13, 2026)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4058,7 +4058,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Server</th><th>Status</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdag-regering</td><td>✅ Live</td><td>Confirmed 2026-04-22T23:38:58Z</td></tr><tr><td>world-bank</td><td>✅ Available</td><td>Sweden GDP/inflation data</td></tr><tr><td>scb</td><td>✅ Available</td><td>Statistics Sweden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4101,7 +4101,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses (T
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Articles</th><th>Key dok_ids</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/</td><td>16 docs</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/</td><td>5 docs</td><td>HD10442, HD10443, HD10444, HD10445, HD10446</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/</td><td>20 docs</td><td>HD024082, HD024092, HD024098, HD024090, HD024097</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/</td><td>15 docs</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236, HD03240, HD03232</td><td>✅ Full</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/</td><td>Partial</td><td>Prior cycle reference</td><td>✅ Available</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis">Consolidated Documents for Today's Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis">Consolidated Documents for Today's Evening Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4276,7 +4276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-consolidated-documents-for-todays-evening-analysis">Consolidated Docu
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Source folder</th><th>Full-text</th><th>DIW</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>9.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget för 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Uttalanden om ätstörningsvården i Region Stockholm</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas vid husrannsakan</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>8.1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt av nyckelfastigheter</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — S motion mot sänkt drivmedelsskatt</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — V motion mot sänkt drivmedelsskatt</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — MP motion mot sänkt drivmedelsskatt</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning</td><td>mot (V)</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning (C, partial)</td><td>mot</td><td>motions</td><td>METADATA</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkning av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>7.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>ip</td><td>interpellations</td><td>✅</td><td>7.3</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>7.2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>prop</td><td>propositions</td><td>✅</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för bostadsrätter</td><td>bet</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>✅</td><td>7.0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-context"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Sweden GDP growth 2024: 0.82% (World Bank)</li>
 <li>Sweden GDP growth 2023: -0.20%</li>
@@ -4284,11 +4284,59 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-context">Economic Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>Sweden Unemployment 2025: 8.7%</li>
 <li>Fiscal impact HD01FiU48: −4.1 billion SEK budget balance</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>API returned 0 direct hits for 2026-04-22 in real-time search; all data sourced from sibling folder analyses produced during today's earlier workflow runs</li>
 <li>Cross-type synthesis integrates 56 distinct documents across 4 article types</li>
 <li>Prior cycle PIRs read from analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/ for continuity</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03232-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03232-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4356,7 +4404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:09.051Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:30.475Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html b/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html
index 77d2ae8e93..974a441f0d 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Riksdag Realtime Monitor">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.252Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.684Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.252Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.684Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-22T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Realtime Monitor","description":"The Swedish Riksdag enters the final pre-election legislative sprint with three simultaneous breaking-news vectors: (1) the Social Democrats have launched a coordinated four-interpellation…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:09.252Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Realtime Monitor","description":"The Swedish Riksdag enters the final pre-election legislative sprint with three simultaneous breaking-news vectors: (1) the Social Democrats have launched a coordinated four-interpellation…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:30.684Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,20 +216,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>The Swedish Riksdag enters the final pre-election legislative sprint with three simultaneous breaking-news vectors: (1) the Social Democrats have launched a coordinated four-interpellation accountability offensive against Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) and coalition partners on 2026-04-22, targeting weaknesses in labour, housing, social welfare and civil administration ahead of September 2026 election; (2) the extra supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes was adopted by Riksdag on 2026-04-21, with opposition split along climate-economic lines; and (3) a cluster of substantive propositions on energy, forestry, justice and Ukraine diplomacy signals the Kristersson government's accelerating legislative agenda in the final session before dissolution.</p>
 <p>The S accountability offensive — three separate interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson alone — is the highest-urgency political intelligence signal of the evening. This pattern of multi-vector parliamentary pressure on a single minister indicates a coordinated pre-election strategy to force ministerial missteps in public answers.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial decision</strong>: Whether to cover the S accountability offensive as a unified political story (coordinated attack on Svantesson) or as separate interpellations — the unified framing is analytically stronger.</li>
 <li><strong>Monitoring priority</strong>: Whether to escalate tracking on the employer contribution exploitation case (HD10444) given the Aftonbladet reporting connection — HIGH priority recommended.</li>
 <li><strong>Forecast horizon</strong>: Whether the extra budget fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48 passed) will produce measurable opposition climate-narrative gains ahead of the June budget debate — track via media framing metrics next 7 days.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S triple-strike on Svantesson</strong> [B2]: HD10444 (employer contribution abuse), HD10442 (eating disorder court case), HD10446 (false death declarations) — three vectors simultaneously</li>
 <li><strong>HD10445 housing</strong>: S targets government failure on pre-emption rights for key properties in Stockholm suburbs (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) — segregation policy vector [B2]</li>
@@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Election 2026 lens</strong>: Every interpellation is targeted at a named minister — this is debate-priming for the election campaign</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">📅 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">📅 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</strong>: Ministerial answers to the four interpellations will be debated in the Riksdag chamber. Svantesson's responses to HD10442 (eating disorder court case) and HD10444 (employer contributions) carry the highest media-volatility risk. A single factually contested answer could become the week's dominant political story ahead of the June budget debate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-label">🔍 Confidence Label<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-label"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-label">🔍 Confidence Label<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-label"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Overall assessment confidence</strong>: HIGH [B2] — based on direct MCP retrieval of parliamentary documents and cross-reference with today's sibling analysis folders (propositions, motions, committeeReports, interpellations).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--intelligence-landscape-map">📊 Intelligence Landscape Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-landscape-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-landscape-map">📊 Intelligence Landscape Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-landscape-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     BREAK["⚡ BREAKING 2026-04-22&#x3C;br/>Realtime-2338 Monitor"] --> A1["S Accountability Offensive&#x3C;br/>4 interpellations filed&#x3C;br/>CRITICAL priority"]
     BREAK --> A2["FiU48 enacted&#x3C;br/>Fuel tax cut in force&#x3C;br/>HIGH impact"]
@@ -277,17 +277,17 @@ <h2 id="rm--intelligence-landscape-map">📊 Intelligence Landscape Map<a class=
     style C2 fill:#1565c0,color:#FFFFFF
     style C3 fill:#1565c0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Subfolder</strong>: realtime-2338
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Methodology</strong>: synthesis-methodology.md, ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v6.4
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY STORY</strong>: Social Democrats launch coordinated four-interpellation accountability offensive against the Kristersson coalition on 2026-04-22, with three interpellations targeting Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) in a single day. The employer contribution exploitation case (HD10444) — based on Aftonbladet reporting that retailers diverted the youth employment tax relief into profits rather than new jobs — delivers the sharpest fiscal-policy attack vector ahead of the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY STORY</strong>: The extra supplementary budget (HD01FiU48) was enacted by Riksdag on 2026-04-21 with cross-party support, cutting fuel taxes by 82 öre/litre from 1 May 2026. Despite opposition motions from MP, V, and S (HD024098, HD024092), the coalition prevailed. This signals the government's pre-election energy-cost relief narrative is successfully deployed.</p>
 <p><strong>TERTIARY STORY</strong>: A cluster of five major propositions submitted on 2026-04-14–16 — including new electricity system laws (HD03240), youth offender sentencing reform (HD03246), and dual Ukraine diplomatic instruments (HD03231, HD03232) — demonstrate the government's accelerating legislative push in the final pre-election session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -405,18 +405,18 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ra
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Document</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD10444</td><td>Arbetsgivaravgift abuse → Svantesson</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning → Slottner (KD)</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Housing pre-emption rights → Carlson (KD)</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD10446</td><td>False death declarations → Svantesson</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra budget: fuel+el+gas (ENACTED)</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.7</strong></td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Unga lagöverträdare — sentencing reform</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine damage commission entry</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine aggression tribunal</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Husrannsakan secrecy — constitution</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.7</strong></td><td>L2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>The realtime intelligence picture on the evening of 2026-04-22 shows <strong>four concurrent political dynamics</strong>:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical">1. Pre-Election Accountability War (CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical">1. Pre-Election Accountability War (CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical"></a></h4>
 <p>Socialdemokraterna are executing a deliberate multi-vector ministerial accountability strategy. The selection of three interpellations targeting Svantesson — the government's most prominent fiscal figure — reflects S research into her past statements on employer contributions (HD10444: Aftonbladet confirmed 20+ retailers diverted the relief), the eating disorder court case (HD10442: court vindication of Region Stockholm), and the Skatteverket false death registration failures (HD10446). Admiralty source: [A1] — all from riksdagen.se direct API.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high">2. Budget Enacted — Relief Narrative Active (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high">2. Budget Enacted — Relief Narrative Active (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high"></a></h4>
 <p>The coalition secured passage of HD01FiU48 despite cross-party opposition, establishing a "government cuts your fuel costs" narrative for the summer driving season (1 May–30 September 2026). S/V/MP objection through motions is now <strong>overridden</strong> — the relief is law. [A1]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high">3. Legislative Sprint — Energy and Security Cluster (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high">3. Legislative Sprint — Energy and Security Cluster (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high"></a></h4>
 <p>The April 14–16 proposition cluster reveals a policy agenda accelerating toward the election: energy laws, forestry liberalisation, arms regulation, Ukraine diplomacy, and youth crime — all areas with documented electoral salience. [A2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium">4. Opposition Fragmentation (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium">4. Opposition Fragmentation (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium"></a></h4>
 <p>On deportation (HD024095) and medical care (HD024094), Centerpartiet is attempting to amend rather than reject government proposals — signalling the C's continued attempt to position itself as a responsible alternative at the political centre rather than aligning with S/V/MP on full rejection. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Collection method</strong>: riksdag-regering MCP server (live, verified at 23:38Z). Source authority [A] for all riksdagen.se-origin documents. Completeness [2] — documents cover today's interpellations fully; committee betänkanden covers last 5 days; propositions from past 8 days. Cross-reference with four sibling analysis folders (propositions, motions, committeeReports, interpellations) from today's analysis/daily/2026-04-22/ tree.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Signal vs. Urgency — Realtime Monitor 2026-04-22
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style HD10444 fill:#c62828,color:#fff
     style HD01FiU48 fill:#e65100,color:#fff
     style HD10443 fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SEO title</strong> (EN): "Sweden's Social Democrats Triple-Target Finance Minister Svantesson in Pre-Election Parliamentary Offensive"</li>
 <li><strong>SEO title</strong> (SV): "S triplerar attack mot finansminister Svantesson i förvalspolitisk offensiv"</li>
@@ -447,46 +447,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>Slug</strong>: breaking-2026-04-22</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Sources</strong>: Riksdag API [A1], Sibling Analysis [A2]
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Confidence</strong>: See per-KJ labels | <strong>Cycle</strong>: Realtime-2338</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37">KJ-1 (Confidence: HIGH — Likely [WEP Level 3/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37">KJ-1 (Confidence: HIGH — Likely [WEP Level 3/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>The Social Democrats have launched a coordinated parliamentary accountability campaign targeting Finance Minister Svantesson as the primary vector for undermining the Tidö coalition's fiscal competence narrative ahead of Election 2026.</strong></p>
 <p><em>Basis</em>: 4 interpellations filed on 2026-04-22 by S MPs, 3 directly targeting Svantesson (HD10442 eating disorder court case, HD10444 employer contributions to social dumping, and one other); the cluster follows a pre-existing HD10442 filed 2026-04-21; the accountability emphasis on Svantesson's stewardship of tax-financed employer contributions aligns with S's positioning as the defender of the Swedish welfare model against labour market exploitation. Source authority: [A1] riksdagen.se API direct retrieval.</p>
 <p><em>Counter-indicator to watch</em>: If S files no further interpellations targeting coalition ministers in the 2026-04-23 to 2026-05-15 window, the campaign was a one-day tactical burst rather than a sustained strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47">KJ-2 (Confidence: MODERATE — Roughly even [WEP Level 4/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47">KJ-2 (Confidence: MODERATE — Roughly even [WEP Level 4/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>The extra budget fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48, effective 2026-05-01) will deliver a visible but small consumer benefit that serves both an electoral signalling function and a legitimate emergency relief function; it is unlikely to produce decisive electoral movement but will feature prominently in the coalition's May 2026 campaign messaging.</strong></p>
 <p><em>Basis</em>: FiU48 adopted by Riksdag 2026-04-21 with S/V/MP voting against (per opposition motions HD024082, HD024092, HD024098). The 82 öre/litre cut is modest but politically legible. International comparator (Germany Tankrabatt 2022) shows such measures have short political shelf-lives but serve as credibility-building signals of government responsiveness. Confidence limited to MODERATE because consumer response is not yet observable [B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17">KJ-3 (Confidence: HIGH — Almost certain [WEP Level 1/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17">KJ-3 (Confidence: HIGH — Almost certain [WEP Level 1/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's legislative output for spring 2026 (propositions cluster: electricity system, wind power, environmental permitting, Ukraine tribunals, youth offenders, data interoperability) demonstrates an active pre-election legislative sprint by the Tidö coalition with a legacy-building objective.</strong></p>
 <p><em>Basis</em>: 8+ propositions submitted April 13–16, 2026 across Näringsdepartementet, Klimat- och näringsdepartementet, Utrikesdepartementet, Justitiedepartementet — covering cross-cutting domains. This density of legislative activity in the final legislative weeks before an autumn election is consistent with "legislative sprint" patterns identified in prior Swedish election cycles. Source: [A1] riksdagen.se API direct retrieval.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability">PIR-1 (STANDING): Government Stability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability">PIR-1 (STANDING): Government Stability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Will the Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L) maintain cohesion through the September 2026 election?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: STABLE with LOW-MODERATE attrition risk. The fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) passed with all four coalition parties supporting. No visible internal split on the accountancy interpellations. [B2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast">PIR-2 (STANDING): Election 2026 Forecast<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast">PIR-2 (STANDING): Election 2026 Forecast<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Which bloc will form government after September 2026?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: UNCERTAIN — polling remains within margin of error. S accountability offensive (HD10444 et al.) is the current best signal of whether S can narrow the gap. [B2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track">PIR-3 (ACTIVE): Svantesson Accountability Track<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track">PIR-3 (ACTIVE): Svantesson Accountability Track<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Will the coordinated interpellation campaign produce a factual error by Svantesson that triggers a KU review petition?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: WATCH. Debate answers expected 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05. Gate indicator: KU petition filed by S within 14 days of debate. [B2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact">PIR-4 (ACTIVE): Fuel Tax Electoral Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact">PIR-4 (ACTIVE): Fuel Tax Electoral Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Does the 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut move consumer sentiment / government approval?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: UNKNOWN. Observable from 2026-05-02 pump price data. [not yet rated]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory">PIR-5 (ACTIVE): Constitutional Amendment Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory">PIR-5 (ACTIVE): Constitutional Amendment Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: What are the HD01KU33/32 constitutional amendments about and do they affect electoral rules?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: FLAG for full-text review. Currently title-only assessment [B3].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position">PIR-6 (STANDING): Ukraine Diplomatic-Legal Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position">PIR-6 (STANDING): Ukraine Diplomatic-Legal Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: How does Sweden's Ukraine tribunal package (HD03231/232) affect Sweden's position within EU diplomatic consensus?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: CONSISTENT — both propositions passed through normal procedures; no breakaway signals. [A2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable">PIR-7 (STANDING): Energy Security Legislative Timetable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable">PIR-7 (STANDING): Energy Security Legislative Timetable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: When will the electricity system, wind power, and environmental permitting propositions (HD03240/239/238) receive committee reports?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: Committee review phase (NäringsU, MiljöU) expected May–June 2026. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR inherited</th><th>Source folder</th><th>Resolution status</th><th>This-cycle update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"What is the coalition's energy security legislative timetable before September 2026 election?"</td><td>propositions/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>HD03240/239/238 submitted — committee review next</td></tr><tr><td>"How will opposition parties exploit the fuel tax cut in the election campaign?"</td><td>motions/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>ACTIVE — escalating</td><td>HD10444 interpellation confirms S using fiscal accountability angle</td></tr><tr><td>"When will KU constitutional amendments (KU33/32) come to second reading post-election?"</td><td>committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>First reading done; must await September 2026 election + new Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td>"Is the S accountability strategy a one-day event or a sustained multi-week campaign?"</td><td>interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>NEWLY UPGRADED to ACTIVE</td><td>Today's 4 interpellations confirm campaign, not one-day event — watch 2026-04-28+</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-calibration-summary">Confidence Calibration Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-calibration-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-calibration-summary">Confidence Calibration Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-calibration-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-calibration-summary">Confidence Calibration Summary<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KJ</th><th>WEP Band</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1</td><td>Likely</td><td>A1</td><td>Direct API evidence for interpellation filing</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2</td><td>Roughly even</td><td>B2</td><td>Consumer response not yet observable</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3</td><td>Almost certain</td><td>A1</td><td>Direct API count of propositions submitted</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Methodology</strong>: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md, significance-scoring.md
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-framework">Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-framework">Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-framework"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>D</strong> (Depth/Impact): 1–10 scale on policy substance and magnitude</li>
 <li><strong>I</strong> (Intelligence Value): 1–10 scale on analytical/predictive utility</li>
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-framework">Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Tier</strong>: L1 Surface / L2 Strategic / L2+ Priority / L3 Intelligence-grade</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-ranked-significance-table">1. Ranked Significance Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-ranked-significance-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-ranked-significance-table">1. Ranked Significance Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-ranked-significance-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-ranked-significance-table">1. Ranked Significance Table<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th><strong>DIW</strong></th><th>Tier</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 — bränsle/el/gas (ENACTED)</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.7</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD10444</td><td>Arbetsgivaravgift abuse — Svantesson interpellation</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner — Slottner</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt — housing pre-emption rights</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Sverige + Ukraine skadeståndskommission</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Sverige + aggressionstribunalen för Ukraina</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar — Svantesson</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar vid husrannsakan (constitution, first reading)</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.7</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier (constitution, first reading)</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.3</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk — regulatory reform</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.0</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Datainteroperabilitet — public sector</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.7</strong></td><td>L1</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024090</td><td>Utvisning — V motion (full rejection)</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.7</strong></td><td>L1</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Drivmedel — MP motion (reject fuel cut)</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.7</strong></td><td>L1</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-sensitivity-analysis">2. Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-sensitivity-analysis">2. Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>High-sensitivity items (DIW ≥ 8.0 with electoral impact)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 [A1]: Enacted — fiscal relief narrative is now law. Electoral impact: S/V/MP LOSE this battle in 2026 pre-election. Government gains summer relief narrative.</li>
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-sensitivity-analysis">2. Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidde
 <li>HD10442 (eating disorder court case) present in interpellations sibling but NOT yet in today's new filings — it was filed 2026-04-21. Admiralty [A1-confirmed by sibling analysis] but excluded from today's new documents list.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-diw-rank-diagram">3. DIW Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-diw-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-diw-rank-diagram">3. DIW Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-diw-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title DIW Scores — Realtime Monitor 2026-04-22
     dateFormat X
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-diw-rank-diagram">3. DIW Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style HD01FiU48 fill:#e65100
     style HD10443 fill:#b71c1c</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay">4. Top Forward Triggers (Significance Decay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay">4. Top Forward Triggers (Significance Decay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -825,16 +825,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay">4. Top Forward Triggers (S
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Significance Decay Date</th><th>Trigger Event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Interpellation debate — Svantesson answer</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>2026-04-29</td><td>Interpellation debate — Slottner answer</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>2026-04-30</td><td>Interpellation debate — Carlson answer</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>2026-05-01</td><td>Fuel tax cut takes effect — petrol prices at pump</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>2026-06-01</td><td>El-system law enters parliamentary committee</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor">Expected Framing by Political Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-governmentcoalition-framing">Government/Coalition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-framing"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor">Expected Framing by Political Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-governmentcoalition-framing">Government/Coalition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Delivery-focused government protecting Swedish households" — HD01FiU48 fuel cut as headline, energy legislation as long-term security
 <strong>Supporting narrative</strong>: "S is engaging in pre-election theatre while we govern"
 <strong>Vulnerability</strong>: HD10444 employer contributions to social dumping — if Svantesson cannot provide factual rebuttal, "government enables wage exploitation" frame becomes credible
 <strong>Tone</strong>: "Responsible fiscal management, record delivery"
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Moderate sympathetic outlets (Expressen, SvD), governmental press conferences</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing">S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing">S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Coalition ministers fail to protect Swedish workers and vulnerable citizens"
 <strong>Sub-frames</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -845,19 +845,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing">S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing<a class=
 <strong>Tone</strong>: Accountability, moral outrage (carefully calibrated to avoid "too strident")
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Aftonbladet, LO-Tidningen, S-aligned regional press</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: Unlikely to prominently cover S interpellations (different accountability axis). Will focus on fuel tax cut SUCCESS (populist energy nationalism) and youth crime reform (HD03246).
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Avpixlat-adjacent outlets, social media</p>
-<h3 id="rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing">MP (Miljöpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing">MP (Miljöpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Fuel tax cut is climate regression; coalition abandons Sweden's climate commitments"
 <strong>Sub-frame</strong>: Energy legislation (HD03239 vindkraft) as insufficient half-measure
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Miljömagasinet, urban progressive press</p>
-<h3 id="rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing">V (Vänsterpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing">V (Vänsterpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Government cuts fuel tax instead of investing in public transport — wrong priorities for working class"
 <strong>Sub-frame</strong>: Social dumping (aligns with HD10443/HD10444) — V's traditional labour market accountability frame
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Flamman, Proletären, social media</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets">Expected Mainstream Media Framing (Swedish Press Outlets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets">Expected Mainstream Media Framing (Swedish Press Outlets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets">Expected Mai
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>Expected Frame</th><th>Based on past coverage patterns</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Aftonbladet</td><td>Accountability-first: Svantesson interpellations lead</td><td>S-sympathetic tabloid; likely HD10444/10442 double spread [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Expressen</td><td>Balanced accountability with coalition defence</td><td>Centre-liberal; will examine both interpellations and coalition's fuel tax delivery [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Dagens Nyheter (DN)</td><td>Analysis: "Is this a turning point?"</td><td>Quality broadsheet; likely scenario analysis rather than pure accountability [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>SVT Nyheter</td><td>Public interest neutral: all 4 interpellations reported</td><td>Public broadcaster; procedural coverage of all parties [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>SvD</td><td>Business-framing: HD01FiU48 economic analysis</td><td>Conservative-leaning; will examine fiscal impact of fuel cut [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-risk-matrix">Framing Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-risk-matrix">Framing Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Media Framing Risk vs. Coalition Electoral Impact
     x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
@@ -911,10 +911,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-risk-matrix">Framing Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     Energy legislation: [0.2, 0.4]
     HD03246 youth crime reform: [0.3, 0.5]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc">Lens 1: Government Coalition (Tidö Bloc)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc">Lens 1: Government Coalition (Tidö Bloc)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc">Lens 1: Government Coalition
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Finance Minister</td><td>HIGH NEGATIVE</td><td>Defending three simultaneous interpellations; managing fiscal + accountability narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Infrastructure/Housing Minister</td><td>MEDIUM NEGATIVE</td><td>HD10445 forces public accounting on SOU 2024:38 non-implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Erik Slottner (KD)</td><td>Civilminister</td><td>MEDIUM NEGATIVE</td><td>HD10443 forces answer on municipal social dumping practices</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Justice Minister</td><td>NEUTRAL-POSITIVE</td><td>HD03246 (youth offenders) strengthens his law-and-order record</td></tr><tr><td>Johan Britz (KD/L)</td><td>Climate &#x26; Energy Minister</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD03240 (electricity laws), HD03239 (wind power) are his core delivery</td></tr><tr><td>Lotta Edholm (L)</td><td>Acting PM (April)</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>Signed HD03240 — positioned as energy competence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-parties">Lens 2: Opposition Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-parties"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-parties">Lens 2: Opposition Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-parties"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-parties">Lens 2: Opposition Parties<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Magdalena Andersson (S)</td><td>Opposition Leader</td><td>POSITIVE</td><td>S accountability strategy generates election material</td></tr><tr><td>Jonathan Svensson (S)</td><td>MP, HD10444 author</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>Executing employer contribution investigation angle</td></tr><tr><td>Markus Kallifatides (S)</td><td>MP, HD10445/HD10442</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>Two-pronged housing + healthcare accountability attack</td></tr><tr><td>Peder Björk (S)</td><td>MP, HD10443 author</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>Social welfare accountability angle</td></tr><tr><td>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</td><td>V leader</td><td>POSITIVE</td><td>V motion HD024092 positions V as climate-social alternative</td></tr><tr><td>Janine Alm Ericson (MP)</td><td>MP HD024098</td><td>POSITIVE</td><td>MP framing fuel cut as climate retreat</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups">Lens 3: Directly Affected Citizens/Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups">Lens 3: Directly Affected Citizens/Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups">Lens 3: Directly Affected Ci
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Swedish motorists (~5 million)</td><td>POSITIVE (82 öre/L fuel cut from May 1)</td><td>[A1] HD01FiU48 enacted</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm suburban residents (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved)</td><td>NEGATIVE (pre-emption rights not advanced)</td><td>[B2] HD10445</td></tr><tr><td>Young workers (employer contribution reduction beneficiaries)</td><td>NEGATIVE if exploitation confirmed</td><td>[B2] HD10444</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal welfare recipients (social dumping victims)</td><td>NEGATIVE (transferral without consent documented)</td><td>[B2] HD10443</td></tr><tr><td>~30 citizens/year wrongly declared dead</td><td>NEGATIVE (Skatteverket failure ongoing)</td><td>[A2] HD10446</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-institutional-actors">Lens 4: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-institutional-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-institutional-actors">Lens 4: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-institutional-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-institutional-actors">Lens 4: Institutional Actors<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Institution</th><th>Position</th><th>Stakes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Skatteverket</td><td>Under scrutiny</td><td>HD10446 false death declarations (~30/year admitted by Svantesson)</td></tr><tr><td>Kommunförbundet (SKR)</td><td>Watching closely</td><td>HD10443 social dumping creates inter-municipal tension</td></tr><tr><td>Riksrevisionen</td><td>Active</td><td>HD01MJU21 (agriculture climate audit) ongoing; HD01CU42 (dödsbon) laid to table</td></tr><tr><td>JO (Justitieombudsman)</td><td>Potential</td><td>Social dumping (HD10443) could attract JO complaint if interpellation reveals systematic violations</td></tr><tr><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td>Active</td><td>HD01CU27 (identity at land registration) strengthens registration controls</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector">Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector">Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector">Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sector</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Swedish retailers (named in Aftonbladet investigation)</td><td>NEGATIVE (HD10444 accountability pressure)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy sector (electricity producers)</td><td>POSITIVE (HD03240 new framework)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power developers</td><td>POSITIVE/MIXED (HD03239 revenue sharing mandates)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry/Timber sector</td><td>POSITIVE (HD03242 clearer active forestry rules)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Arms manufacturers</td><td>MONITORING (HD024091/096 motions; policy not changed)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context">Lens 6: International/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context">Lens 6: International/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context">Lens 6: International/EU Context<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ukraine government</td><td>POSITIVE (HD03231 + HD03232 Sweden joins tribunals/commission)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>MONITORING (fuel tax cut at EU minimum floor; HD01FiU48)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>NATO partners</td><td>NEUTRAL-POSITIVE (Ukraine solidarity strengthens security partnership)</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network-map">Influence Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-map">Influence Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     S_PARTY["🔴 S Opposition&#x3C;br/>Coordinated 4 interpellations"] --> SVANTESSON["Elisabeth Svantesson (M)&#x3C;br/>Finance Minister"]
     S_PARTY --> SLOTTNER["Erik Slottner (KD)&#x3C;br/>Civilminister"]
@@ -1175,87 +1175,87 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network-map">Influence Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style HD01FiU48 fill:#e65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style HD03246 fill:#1565c0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>≥10 dated indicators across 4 time horizons (Near, Short, Medium, Long)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06">Horizon 1: Near-Term (0–14 days: 2026-04-22 to 2026-05-06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers">FI-1: Svantesson interpellation debate answers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06">Horizon 1: Near-Term (0–14 days: 2026-04-22 to 2026-05-06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers">FI-1: Svantesson interpellation debate answers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Did Svantesson provide factual, specific answers to HD10444 (employer contributions) and HD10442 (eating disorder court case)?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Detailed factual answer with Finansinspektionen/Tillväxtverket data → narrative containment
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: Vague or deflective answer → S picks up 2-4 points in next poll, KU petition likely
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se anföranden, SVT Nyheter coverage</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate">FI-2: HD10446 false death declaration debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate">FI-2: HD10446 false death declaration debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Carlson (KD) provides government's account of Skatteverket/Socialstyrelsen coordination on false death records
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Documented remediation of process → issue closed
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: No systemic fix documented → JO complaint risk [B2]
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se anföranden</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility">FI-3: HD01FiU48 pump price visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility">FI-3: HD01FiU48 pump price visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-02 to 2026-05-05
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Do major Swedish fuel retailers (Preem, Circle K, OKQ8) publish pump price reduction reflecting 82 öre tax cut?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Visible pump price drop → government can claim HD01FiU48 impact
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: No visible drop → opposition "fake relief" narrative activated
 <strong>Source</strong>: Fuel retailer price data (public websites)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle">FI-4: New S/V/MP interpellations after HD10444 cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle">FI-4: New S/V/MP interpellations after HD10444 cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-04-23 to 2026-05-06
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: How many further accountability interpellations filed by S between now and May 6?
 <strong>Green signal (for coalition)</strong>: 0–1 further interpellations → one-day tactical burst
 <strong>Red signal (for coalition)</strong>: ≥3 further interpellations → sustained campaign confirmed
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se search_dokument(doktyp=ip, rm=2025/26)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03">Horizon 2: Short-Term (2–6 weeks: 2026-05-06 to 2026-06-03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238">FI-5: Energy legislation committee reports (HD03240/239/238)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03">Horizon 2: Short-Term (2–6 weeks: 2026-05-06 to 2026-06-03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238">FI-5: Energy legislation committee reports (HD03240/239/238)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-15 to 2026-06-15
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Do NäringsU and MiljöU publish positive committee reports enabling Riksdag votes before summer recess?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: All three approved → coalition pre-election legacy narrative
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: One or more deferred to autumn → "unfinished business" opposition attack
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=NU,MJU)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report">FI-6: Youth offender reform (HD03246) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report">FI-6: Youth offender reform (HD03246) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-30 to 2026-06-10
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does JuU publish committee report on unga lagöverträdare reform?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Approved with broad support → bipartisan crime policy achievement
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: S/V/MP dissents → crime policy dividing line in election campaign
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=JuU)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle">FI-7: Polling movement post-interpellation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle">FI-7: Polling movement post-interpellation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-10 to 2026-05-20
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Do Novus/Ipsos/SIFO polls show S moving above 30% following interpellation cycle?
 <strong>Green signal (for S)</strong>: S polling >30% → accountability campaign gaining electoral traction
 <strong>Green signal (for coalition)</strong>: M+SD+KD+L hold ≥176 projected seats → Tidö continuation
 <strong>Source</strong>: Published poll aggregates (Novus, Ipsos, SIFO)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01">Horizon 3: Medium-Term (6 weeks–3 months: 2026-06-03 to 2026-09-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal">FI-8: C (Centerpartiet) coalition signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01">Horizon 3: Medium-Term (6 weeks–3 months: 2026-06-03 to 2026-09-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal">FI-8: C (Centerpartiet) coalition signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-06-15 to 2026-08-01
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does C party leader (Muharrem Demirok) state a preference for post-election coalition direction?
 <strong>Green signal (for Tidö)</strong>: C signals it will prioritise governing with M over S bloc
 <strong>Green signal (for S bloc)</strong>: C signals openness to S-led government
 <strong>Source</strong>: Press interviews, SVT/SR Almedalen declarations (Almedalen late June)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll">FI-9: L (Liberalerna) threshold poll<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll">FI-9: L (Liberalerna) threshold poll<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-06-01 to 2026-09-13
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does L consistently poll above 4% in ≥3 successive polls?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: L above 4% → Tidö coalition arithmetic stable
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: L polling below 4% in ≥2 polls → threshold risk scenario activated
 <strong>Source</strong>: Published poll aggregates</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report">FI-10: Ukraine tribunal legislation (HD03231/232) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report">FI-10: Ukraine tribunal legislation (HD03231/232) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-20 to 2026-06-15
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does UtU publish report approving Ukraine tribunal framework propositions?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Approved → Sweden's Ukraine transitional justice role confirmed
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=UU)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward">Horizon 4: Long-Term (3+ months: 2026-09-01 onward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition">FI-11: Election 2026 result — Riksdag composition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward">Horizon 4: Long-Term (3+ months: 2026-09-01 onward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition">FI-11: Election 2026 result — Riksdag composition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-09-13
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Which bloc achieves majority (175 seats)?
 <strong>Source</strong>: Swedish Election Authority (Valmyndigheten)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading">FI-12: HD01KU33/32 constitutional second reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading">FI-12: HD01KU33/32 constitutional second reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-10-01 to 2027-03-01
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does the newly constituted Riksdag (post-election) advance KU33/32 to second reading and approval?
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se post-election session documents</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-indicator-dashboard">Forward Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicator-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicator-dashboard">Forward Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicator-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
     dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
@@ -1276,12 +1276,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-indicator-dashboard">Forward Indicator Dashboard<a class="" a
         FI-11 Election Day                :milestone, 2026-09-13, 1d
         FI-12 KU constitutional 2nd read  :2026-10-01, 2027-03-01</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Three scenarios for the political trajectory of the S accountability offensive and its impact on Election 2026, based on the interpellation cluster filed 2026-04-22.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25">Scenario 1: "Accountability Breakthrough" (Probability: 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25">Scenario 1: "Accountability Breakthrough" (Probability: 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson provides a factually challenged or evasive answer to one or more of the three interpellations targeting her (HD10444 employer contributions, HD10442 eating disorder court case, HD10446 false death declarations). Media coverage escalates to a sustained news cycle over 10+ days. KU constitutional review petition filed by S group.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25">Scenario 1: "A
 <p><strong>Election impact</strong>: HIGH negative for M/coalition. Fiscal competence narrative damaged. S gains 1–3 percentage points in polls (within polling error but directionally significant).</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade</strong>: Coalition considers emergency response (press conference, Riksdag statement); possible M party executive communication strategy revision.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55">Scenario 2: "Narrative Containment" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55">Scenario 2: "Narrative Containment" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson delivers measured, factually defended answers to all three interpellations. Media coverage is routine (one news cycle, 3–5 days). The coalition successfully pivots to the fuel tax relief implementation (2026-05-01) and energy legislation agenda (HD03240, HD03239). The S accountability offensive scores tactical points but does not produce a sustained narrative advantage.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55">Scenario 2: "Narrati
 <p><strong>Election impact</strong>: NEUTRAL. Status quo maintained. Both S and coalition activate base supporters but neither gains net new voters from interpellation cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade</strong>: S shifts to next accountability target (possibly housing segregation HD10445, or education/healthcare domains).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20">Scenario 3: "Opposition Fragmentation" (Probability: 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20">Scenario 3: "Opposition Fragmentation" (Probability: 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The S accountability offensive backfires. The government points to enacted legislation (HD01FiU48 fuel relief, HD03246 youth crime, HD03244 data interoperability) as proof of delivery. Media frames the interpellations as pre-election theatre. Centerpartiet (C) explicitly distances itself from S on deportation (HD024095 amending rather than rejecting prop. 2025/26:235) — fracturing the "alternative bloc" narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1314,12 +1314,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20">Scenario 3: "Oppo
 <p><strong>Election impact</strong>: POSITIVE for coalition. S bloc cohesion weakened. C positioned as responsible alternative, potentially in coalition talks regardless of who wins.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade</strong>: S internal pressure to find stronger accountability angle; possible leadership communication tension within S parliamentary group.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Scenario Probabilities — Realtime 2026-04-22
     "Scenario 1: Accountability Breakthrough" : 25
     "Scenario 2: Narrative Containment" : 55
     "Scenario 3: Opposition Fragmentation" : 20</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-leading-indicator-matrix">Leading Indicator Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicator-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-leading-indicator-matrix">Leading Indicator Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicator-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1369,10 +1369,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-leading-indicator-matrix">Leading Indicator Matrix<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Scenario 1</th><th>Scenario 2</th><th>Scenario 3</th><th>Watch date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson interpellation answer quality</td><td>Weak/evasive</td><td>Measured</td><td>Strong + deflects</td><td>2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet follow-up on HD10444</td><td>Published + names retailers</td><td>No follow-up</td><td>Aftonbladet retracts/corrects</td><td>2026-04-25–05-05</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel prices at pump post-May 1</td><td>No visible drop</td><td>Moderate drop</td><td>Significant drop, consumer praise</td><td>2026-05-02</td></tr><tr><td>C party statement on HD024095</td><td>Aligns with S</td><td>Silent</td><td>Praises government approach</td><td>2026-04-25</td></tr><tr><td>Media framing (SVT/DN/Aftonbladet)</td><td>"Crisis" framing</td><td>"Politics as usual"</td><td>"S overreach" framing</td><td>Daily from 2026-04-28</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items">Risk Register (5 Dimensions × 5 Items)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-definitions">Dimension Definitions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-definitions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items">Risk Register (5 Dimensions × 5 Items)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-definitions">Dimension Definitions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-definitions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>L</strong>: Likelihood (1–5)</li>
 <li><strong>I</strong>: Impact (1–5)</li>
@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-definitions">Dimension Definitions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Score</strong>: L × I (adjusted for T, R)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442">Risk 1 — Interpellation Debate Escalation to Ministerial Crisis [HD10444/HD10442]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442">Risk 1 — Interpellation Debate Escalation to Ministerial Crisis [HD10444/HD10442]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: If Finance Minister Svantesson delivers a weak or factually challenged answer to HD10444 (employer contributions) or HD10442 (eating disorders court case) during the parliamentary debate (expected 2026-04-28–05-05), the accountability story will compound. Given the court vindication of Region Stockholm in HD10442 and documented Aftonbladet evidence for HD10444, the evidentiary burden on Svantesson is high.</p>
 
 
@@ -1408,7 +1408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd1044
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor debate scheduling; prepare analytical brief on each interpellation text vs. prior ministerial statements.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading risk</strong>: Parliamentary demand for Riksdag Konstitutionsutskott review of ministerial statements → constitutional accountability track (possible post-election).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48">Risk 2 — Fuel Tax Cut Backfire: Climate Credibility Collapse [HD01FiU48]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48">Risk 2 — Fuel Tax Cut Backfire: Climate Credibility Collapse [HD01FiU48]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The enacted 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48) reduces Sweden's energy tax to EU minimum floor. If spring/summer fuel consumption increases significantly and emissions data shows uptick, the opposition will have a documented case that the government prioritised electoral cost relief over climate commitments. Particularly damaging if COP or EU review coincides.</p>
 
 
@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48"
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Track fuel consumption data from Trafikverket and SCB fuel statistics post-1 May 2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443">Risk 3 — Social Dumping Litigation / Human Rights Escalation [HD10443]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443">Risk 3 — Social Dumping Litigation / Human Rights Escalation [HD10443]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Interpellation HD10443 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443) documents systematic municipal social dumping — transferring vulnerable residents between municipalities without consent. If civil society organizations or the Justitieombudsman (JO) initiate formal complaints, the government faces a dual legislative-judicial track crisis.</p>
 
 
@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443">R
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor JO diariet for new incoming complaints on kommunal social dumping; check SOU 2025 docket for related investigations.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445">Risk 4 — Stockholm Housing Segregation Escalation [HD10445]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445">Risk 4 — Stockholm Housing Segregation Escalation [HD10445]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Failure to advance SOU 2024:38 recommendations on municipal pre-emption rights for key suburban properties (HD10445, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10445) creates a structural risk: if a private equity or speculative investor acquires one of the named centre properties (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) before the election, the political fallout for the government's urban policy will be acute.</p>
 
 
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445">Risk 4 —
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor property transaction records via Lantmäteriet for named suburban centres; track SOU 2024:38 implementation status.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240">Risk 5 — Energy Law Delay: Electricity System Legislation [HD03240]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240">Risk 5 — Energy Law Delay: Electricity System Legislation [HD03240]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The new electricity system laws (HD03240, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240, submitted 2026-04-14 by Climate and Business Dept.) are scheduled for committee review. If the legislative timeline slips past the September 2026 election, the successor government (of any composition) will inherit an unresolved electricity system framework — creating regulatory uncertainty for grid investments.</p>
 
 
@@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240">Risk
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor NMU/KNU committee scheduling for HD03240 after submission.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A["HD10444 Employer contribution abuse"] --> B["Interpellation debate 2026-04-28+"]
     B --> C{"Svantesson answer quality?"}
@@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style I fill:#f57f17,color:#000000
     style J fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF
     style E fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h3>
 <p>| Risk | P(Trigger Event) | P(Escalation|Trigger) | P(Full escalation) |
 |------|-----------------|----------------------|-------------------|
 | R1: Ministerial debate escalation | 0.40 | 0.45 | <strong>0.18</strong> |
@@ -1543,15 +1543,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a cl
 | R4: Stockholm housing incident | 0.20 | 0.40 | <strong>0.08</strong> |
 | R5: Energy law delay | 0.30 | 0.35 | <strong>0.11</strong> |</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Framework</strong>: political-swot-framework.md
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Cycle</strong>: Realtime-2338 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h3>
 <p>This SWOT analyses the <strong>political position of the Kristersson coalition government</strong> as revealed by the 2026-04-22 realtime parliamentary intelligence picture — specifically assessing governmental strengths, weaknesses, opposition opportunities, and external threats visible in today's documents.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1">S1 — Budget Enacted: Fiscal Relief Narrative Active [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1">S1 — Budget Enacted: Fiscal Relief Narrative Active [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The extra supplementary budget (HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48) passed on 2026-04-21 despite cross-party opposition from S, V and MP. The government now holds a concrete "we cut your fuel costs" narrative deliverable for the summer campaign: 82 öre/litre petrol cut from 1 May 2026. The cross-party majority (M+SD+KD+L+C) demonstrates the Tidö coalition's legislative operability even in contentious fiscal territory.</p>
 
 
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1">S1 — Budget E
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48 enacted 2026-04-21; 82 öre/L cut; 4.1 GSEK fiscal impact</td><td>[A1]</td><td>9</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1">S2 — Legislative Sprint Delivering on Agenda [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1">S2 — Legislative Sprint Delivering on Agenda [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Five major propositions submitted April 14–16 (HD03240 electricity, HD03242 forestry, HD03246 youth offenders, HD03232/231 Ukraine tribunals) demonstrate legislative productivity. This counters opposition narratives of a "do-nothing government" ahead of the election. Each proposition touches a key constituency: rural (forestry), security (crime), energy (electricity/housing), international (Ukraine).</p>
 
 
@@ -1588,8 +1588,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1">S2 — Legislative Sp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03240 (data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240), HD03242, HD03246, HD03231, HD03232 submitted Apr 14–16</td><td>[A1]</td><td>7</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2">W1 — Finance Minister Svantesson: Three Simultaneous Accountability Vectors [A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2">W1 — Finance Minister Svantesson: Three Simultaneous Accountability Vectors [A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2"></a></h4>
 <p>On 2026-04-22 alone, the S opposition filed three separate interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson (HD10444 employer contributions, HD10446 false deaths, HD10442 eating disorder court case). Each targets a documented past ministerial statement that is either contested or contradicted by subsequent events. The concentration of fire on a single minister signals S has research files ready for a coordinated debate campaign.</p>
 
 
@@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vec
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444), HD10446 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10446) filed 2026-04-22; HD10442 filed 2026-04-21</td><td>[A2]</td><td>9</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2">W2 — Employer Contribution Exploitation Scandal [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2">W2 — Employer Contribution Exploitation Scandal [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>The HD10444 interpellation cites an Aftonbladet investigation showing major retailers diverted the youth employment tax relief (10.9% reduction from April 2026) into profit margins rather than new jobs. Riksdagen's own legislative intent was youth job creation. If confirmed, this undermines the flagship labour market reform narrative.</p>
 
 
@@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2">W2 — Employer Co
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444 text citing Aftonbladet investigation (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444); employer contribution reduction enacted April 2026</td><td>[B2]</td><td>8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2">W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2">W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellation HD10443 (Peder Björk/S → Civilminister Slottner/KD) documents that vulnerable persons — social welfare recipients, asylum seekers — are being transferred between municipalities without consent, violating their right to self-determination and established residence. This represents a structural failure in the government's social welfare coordination model.</p>
 
 
@@ -1644,23 +1644,23 @@ <h3 id="rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2">W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10443 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443); municipalities: informal transfer practices documented</td><td>[B2]</td><td>8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1">O1 — Energy Security Narrative Ownership [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1">O1 — Energy Security Narrative Ownership [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The combined passage of HD01FiU48 (fuel cut) and submission of HD03240 (new electricity system laws) and HD03239 (wind power revenue sharing) gives the government a coherent "energy security + household relief" narrative going into the election. If electricity prices remain elevated through summer 2026, the government's proactive measures will be politically valuable. Source: HD01FiU48 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1">O2 — Ukraine Solidarity Positioning [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1">O2 — Ukraine Solidarity Positioning [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The dual Ukraine propositions (HD03231 aggression tribunal + HD03232 damage commission; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232) position Sweden in the front rank of European Ukraine support. Given Sweden's new NATO membership context, this carries strong cross-party consensus value and foreign policy credibility heading into the election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1">O3 — Law and Order Narrative: Youth Offenders [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1">O3 — Law and Order Narrative: Youth Offenders [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>HD03246 (Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare, Gunnar Strömmer, Justitiedept.; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03246) strengthens the government's law-and-order credentials. Youth crime is a high-salience electoral topic where the Tidö bloc has historically polled strongly, particularly among SD voters.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2">T1 — Coordinated S Accountability Offensive Could Dominate News Cycle [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2">T1 — Coordinated S Accountability Offensive Could Dominate News Cycle [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>The four interpellations filed today (HD10444, HD10443, HD10445, HD10446) are structured to generate debate material over the next 7–10 days. If any ministerial answer is factually challenged or contradicted by subsequent evidence, the accountability story will compound. The eating disorder court case (HD10442, where Region Stockholm won 67 MSEK and vindicated its earlier statements) is the pre-existing live risk. Source: interpellations sibling analysis for HD10442.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2">T2 — Fuel Tax Cut: Climate Policy Credibility Damage [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2">T2 — Fuel Tax Cut: Climate Policy Credibility Damage [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>The 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) aligns Sweden with EU minimum levels but is widely framed as a retreat from climate commitments. Opposition motions from MP (HD024098) and V (HD024092) have created a documented record that the government prioritised cost relief over emissions reduction. Ahead of the 2026 election, this may reduce support among climate-sensitive voters (green-conservative segment that traditionally splits between M, C, L, and MP). Source: HD024098, HD024092 (riksdagen.se).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2">T3 — Housing Segregation Backlash in Stockholm [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2">T3 — Housing Segregation Backlash in Stockholm [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellation HD10445 (Markus Kallifatides/S → Andreas Carlson/KD) documents the government's failure to act on SOU 2024:38 recommendations for municipal pre-emption rights over key suburban properties. The affected suburbs (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) are densely populated Stockholm districts with high immigrant-background populations — this story has the potential to intersect housing policy, segregation, and social cohesion debates in a city where swing voters matter for election outcomes. Source: HD10445 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10445).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths</th><th>Weaknesses</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Energy narrative (S2+O1) — leverage legislative productivity + relief measures as pre-election fiscal competence proof</td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Redirect accountability to reform (W1+O3) — use HD03246 law-and-order delivery to shift debate away from Svantesson accountability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Lead with Ukraine solidarity (S2+T1) — keep foreign policy and security narrative active to counter domestic accountability media cycle</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: Climate credibility repair (W1+T2) — acknowledge climate trade-off in HD01FiU48 explicitly; commit to compensating measure before election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant cross-SWOT pattern is <strong>W1/T1 convergence</strong>: the S accountability offensive (W1) directly fuels the media-dominance threat (T1). The single most important risk management action for the coalition is <strong>preparing airtight answers</strong> to the HD10444 employer contribution question and the HD10442 eating disorder case before the interpellation debates scheduled 2026-04-28–05-05.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT Strategic Position — Kristersson Government 2026-04-22
@@ -1705,9 +1705,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
     style Energy fill:#2e7d32,color:#fff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt">Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt">Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1763,34 +1763,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt">Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat Code</th><th>Category</th><th>Active</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PTT-1</td><td>Ministerial Accountability (Interpellation-based)</td><td>YES</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-2</td><td>Legislative Agenda Disruption</td><td>MODERATE</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-3</td><td>Media Cycle Dominance (Opposition)</td><td>YES</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-4</td><td>Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack</td><td>YES</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-5</td><td>Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge</td><td>YES</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-6</td><td>Coalition Stability Threat</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-7</td><td>International/Diplomatic Risk</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-active-threat-profiles">Active Threat Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threat-profiles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive">PTT-1: Ministerial Accountability Offensive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-active-threat-profiles">Active Threat Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threat-profiles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive">PTT-1: Ministerial Accountability Offensive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: Socialdemokraterna (S)
 <strong>Target</strong>: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M); Civilminister Erik Slottner (KD); Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Simultaneous interpellations (HD10444, HD10443, HD10445, HD10446) filed 2026-04-22; pre-existing HD10442 from 2026-04-21
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Force ministerial debate answers that can be exploited for election campaign material
 <strong>Capability</strong>: [A2] — S parliamentary group has documented research capacity; prior interpellation pattern confirms coordinated approach
 <strong>Timing</strong>: Activation window 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-10 (parliamentary debate scheduling)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance">PTT-3: Media Cycle Dominance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance">PTT-3: Media Cycle Dominance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: S + sympathetic media (based on Aftonbladet reporting referenced in HD10444)
 <strong>Target</strong>: Government economic management narrative
 <strong>Method</strong>: Interpellation debates + concurrent Aftonbladet investigation provide a dual parliamentary-journalism combination
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Establish "government serves corporations, not workers" counter-narrative to pre-election budget relief
 <strong>Capability</strong>: [B2] — confirmed Aftonbladet investigation exists per HD10444 text; media cycle risk is high given political salience of employer contributions</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack">PTT-4: Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack">PTT-4: Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: S, MP, V
 <strong>Target</strong>: Svantesson; Kristersson government's fiscal management
 <strong>Method</strong>: Three interpellations + opposition motions on prop. 2025/26:236 (HD024098, HD024092)
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Create narrative that government fiscal policy benefits corporations and top earners, not working families
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10444 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444); HD024098, HD024092 (riksdagen.se)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge">PTT-5: Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge">PTT-5: Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: S
 <strong>Target</strong>: Civilminister Slottner (KD) + municipal welfare system
 <strong>Method</strong>: HD10443 social dumping interpellation; HD10445 housing segregation interpellation
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Frame government as failing to protect Sweden's welfare state guarantees
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10443, HD10445 (riksdagen.se)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     ROOT["☠️ THREAT ROOT&#x3C;br/>S Pre-Election Accountability Campaign&#x3C;br/>2026-04-22 Launch [A2]"] --> AT1
     ROOT --> AT2
@@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     style Y1 fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF
     style L1C fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability">Kill Chain (Parliamentary Accountability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability">Kill Chain (Parliamentary Accountability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability">Kill Chain (Parliamentary Ac
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Action</th><th>Signal</th><th>Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>S research on minister's past statements</td><td>Published interpellation texts</td><td>Monitor interpellation content</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Aftonbladet/court evidence compiled</td><td>HD10442, HD10444 text cites evidence</td><td>Verify evidence strength</td></tr><tr><td>Deployment</td><td>Interpellations filed 2026-04-22</td><td>4 interpellations in one day</td><td>Escalation indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>Parliamentary debate answers</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-28–05-05</td><td>Maximum monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>Persistence</td><td>Media coverage + KU petition</td><td>Post-debate coverage</td><td>Track narrative trajectory</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Parliamentary Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Parliamentary Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1909,18 +1909,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mappin
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP-Code</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Procedure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T001</td><td>Accountability</td><td>Multi-interpellation cluster</td><td>File 3+ interpellations targeting one minister</td></tr><tr><td>T002</td><td>Evidence anchoring</td><td>Court/media corroboration</td><td>Cite court decisions + investigative reporting in interpellation text</td></tr><tr><td>T003</td><td>Minister targeting</td><td>Single-target overload</td><td>Force 3+ debate answers from one minister within 2 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>T004</td><td>Temporal compression</td><td>Legislative session timing</td><td>File before summer recess to force answers before campaign starts</td></tr><tr><td>T005</td><td>Cross-domain synchronisation</td><td>Housing+fiscal+welfare</td><td>Attack multiple policy domains simultaneously to prevent single-issue containment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report) | <strong>Adopted</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Finansutskottets betänkande 2025/26:FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget (Vår 2026)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 <strong>Status</strong>: ENACTED — voted and approved by Riksdag 2026-04-21
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: 2026-05-01 (fuel tax relief component)
 <strong>Fiscal impact</strong>: 4.1 billion SEK (estimated full-year cost of fuel tax reduction)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-core-content">Core Content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-core-content"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-core-content">Core Content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-core-content"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary measure</strong>: 82 öre/litre reduction in fuel excise duty (drivmedelsskatt) effective 1 May 2026. Tax rate kept at EU minimum floor. Duration: May–September 2026 (temporary, aligned with summer driving season).</p>
 <p><strong>Secondary measures</strong> (based on committee report framing):</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-core-content">Core Content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>Ukraine support allocation [B2]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🔴 CRITICAL | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: Highest</p>
 <p>This is the most directly consequential enacted legislation in today's cycle. Effects are immediate (May 1, 2026) and tangible (consumers, businesses, opposition critique). The vote on 2026-04-21 confirmed coalition cohesion — M+SD+KD+L all supported; S+V+MP voted against (confirmed by opposition motions HD024098/HD024092/HD024082 in motions analysis).</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition critique</strong> (from motion filings HD024082/092/098):</p>
@@ -1941,14 +1941,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Government framing</strong>: "Protecting household purchasing power during energy cost crisis; staying at EU minimum to maintain credibility of Sweden's energy market position"</p>
 <p><strong>International context</strong>: Germany Tankrabatt 2022 (35 cents/litre, 3 months) as most direct precedent — see comparative-international.md.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval — betänkande confirmed adopted</li>
 <li>Fiscal figure (4.1 GSEK): [A2] — cited in committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md sibling analysis; assumed confirmed</li>
 <li>Vote outcome (opposition voted against): [A2] — inferred from sibling motions analysis + interpellation context</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Pump price data: 2026-05-01+ (FI-3 forward indicator)</li>
 <li>Opposition communication: S campaign messaging expected immediately post-May 1</li>
@@ -1956,47 +1956,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li>KU review petition: If employer contribution mechanism in FiU48 is linked to HD10444 allegations, KU review is theoretically possible [B3 — speculative]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10443">HD10443<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10443 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Reconciliation/Housing/Social Dumping Minister regarding inter-municipal transfer of welfare-dependent residents
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Erik Slottner (KD), Minister for Civil Affairs and Housing
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: High</p>
 <p>Inter-municipal social welfare dumping (kommuner "recommending" welfare recipients to move to cheaper municipalities) is a well-documented governance gap in Sweden's decentralised welfare model. HD10443 raises a systemic failure that no existing national law directly prohibits — municipalities operate under kommunalt självstyre (local self-governance) principle that creates an enforcement gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Why KD/Slottner is targeted</strong>: Slottner is responsible for housing and civil affairs. The interpellation likely focuses on his failure to introduce legislation preventing municipalities from managing welfare costs by informal relocation pressure. KD traditionally emphasises family values and welfare state coherence — being targetted on welfare dumping creates a party-brand dissonance.</p>
 <p><strong>International parallel</strong>: Dutch court ruling 2023, Danish social housing policy — both show this is a real policy problem across Nordic/European welfare states (comparative-international.md).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-1">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-1">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval of interpellation filing</li>
 <li>Content: [B2] Policy substance inferred from title + governance context</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Pattern recognition from sibling analysis (interpellations/synthesis-summary.md)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-1">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-1">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Slottner's debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</li>
 <li>Potential follow-up: JO complaint from affected municipalities or welfare recipients</li>
 <li>Legislative response: HD10443 raises a genuine governance gap — may appear as government proposal in autumn session</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10444">HD10444<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10444 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) regarding employer contributions paid to employers engaged in social dumping
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP (interpellation author — name to be confirmed in debate)
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Elisabeth Svantesson (Moderaterna), Minister for Finance
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🔴 CRITICAL | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: High</p>
 <p>The interpellation directly challenges the coherence of the government's fiscal management. The core allegation is that Swedish state employer contributions (arbetsgivaravgifter) have been paid to employers who engage in social dumping — i.e., exploiting foreign workers at below-market wages while receiving state-funded payroll subsidies.</p>
 <p>This framing is politically devastating for Svantesson because:</p>
@@ -2007,75 +2007,75 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidd
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Link to HD10443</strong>: HD10443 (Slottner interpellation on inter-municipal social dumping) and HD10444 (Svantesson on employer contributions) are thematically related — both use "social dumping" as the accountability frame on the same day [A1].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-2">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-2">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval of interpellation filing</li>
 <li>Content: [B2] Substantive claims in interpellation text not yet verified (text not retrieved in this run)</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Based on political framing inference from title + context</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-2">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-2">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05 (riksdagen.se anföranden)</li>
 <li>KU petition risk: LOW unless Svantesson's answer reveals factual errors in prior statements</li>
 <li>Follow-on media: Aftonbladet investigation into social dumping employers likely</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10445">HD10445<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10445 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Minister for Housing regarding social segregation and housing allocation
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Erik Slottner (KD), Minister for Civil Affairs and Housing
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: Medium-High</p>
 <p>Housing segregation is a perennial Swedish political issue. Slottner is targeted twice on the same day (HD10443 + HD10445) — a deliberate double-targeting strategy by S to depict him as failing Sweden's vulnerable housing population on multiple dimensions.</p>
 <p>The housing segregation framing links to committee reports HD01CU27/28 (civil law, housing allocations) already in progress through Riksdag. S's strategic logic: Slottner's proposals are insufficient to address structural segregation.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral relevance</strong>: Housing affordability and segregation are top-3 voter concerns in Sweden 2026, particularly for the urban progressive segment (voter-segmentation.md Segment 2). The double interpellation (HD10443 + HD10445) maximises media presence on the housing-welfare nexus.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-3">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-3">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval</li>
 <li>Content: [B2] Substance inferred from title + betänkande cross-reference HD01CU27/28</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Electoral relevance inferred from voter concern surveys</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-3">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-3">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Slottner's debate answer (HD10445): 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: HD01CU27/28 committee reports — if Slottner's answer points to these as his action, S can rebut with insufficiency claims</li>
 <li>Media: DN/SVT housing desk likely to use this as hook for housing segregation investigation</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10446">HD10446<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10446 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Minister regarding Skatteverket/Socialstyrelsen false death record declarations affecting living citizens
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Parisa Liljestrand (M) or Gabriel Wikström-equivalent — Minister for Social Affairs or Digital Governance (minister identity to be confirmed from interpellation text)
 <strong>Note</strong>: In the interpellation cluster context, HD10446 is the fourth interpellation in 24 hours; based on title pattern, it addresses cases where citizens were incorrectly declared deceased in official records, affecting their access to healthcare, social insurance, and banking [B2]
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🔴 CRITICAL | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: High</p>
 <p>False death declarations in Swedish welfare state registers (folkbokföring, Skatteverket, Socialstyrelsen) are a digital governance failure with direct harm to individuals. Citizens falsely registered as deceased lose access to healthcare appointments, social insurance payments (Försäkringskassan), and banking services.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this is HIGH significance</strong>: This issue directly undermines the Swedish welfare state's core identity — the precision and reliability of the folkbokföring register. A government that cannot correctly track who is alive has a fundamental administrative credibility problem.</p>
 <p><strong>Political vulnerability</strong>: Unlike the employer contributions issue (which requires knowledge of tax law to assess), false death declarations are immediately comprehensible to every voter. Media can humanise the story with specific victim accounts. This is potentially the most media-viral issue in the interpellation cluster.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-4">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-4">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval (filing confirmed)</li>
 <li>Content: [B3] Substantial substance inferred from title pattern only — full text not retrieved</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Electoral significance based on comparable welfare-state failure stories in 2022–2025 media</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-4">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-4">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Minister debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</li>
 <li>JO risk: HIGH — false death declarations are exactly the type of systemic failure JO investigates</li>
@@ -2083,21 +2083,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch-4">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Socialstyrelsen/Skatteverket response: Agency heads may be called to parliamentary committee hearing</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-context-september-2026">Electoral Context (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-context-september-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-context-september-2026">Electoral Context (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-context-september-2026"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: 13 September 2026 (second Sunday of September, confirmed by electoral calendar)
 <strong>Time remaining</strong>: ~145 days</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-events--electoral-significance">Today's Events — Electoral Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-events--electoral-significance"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance">S Accountability Offensive (HIGH significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-events--electoral-significance">Today's Events — Electoral Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-events--electoral-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance">S Accountability Offensive (HIGH significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10444, HD10445, HD10446, HD10443 + pre-existing HD10442 represent a coordinated S campaign to frame Finance Minister Svantesson and coalition ministers as managing public funds irresponsibly. Electoral logic: S needs to recover fiscal competence image lost during 2014–2022 government tenure. The interpellation strategy targets the coalition's own fiscal credibility narrative [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance">HD01FiU48 Enacted (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance">HD01FiU48 Enacted (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>The coalition can point to a tangible consumer-benefit delivery (fuel cost relief from 1 May 2026) in the election campaign. Historically, Swedish voters reward demonstrable delivery in their daily costs. Risk: the cut is small enough (82 öre/L) to be lost in price volatility [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance">Energy Legislation Sprint (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance">Energy Legislation Sprint (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>8+ propositions submitted April 13–16 creates a legislative legacy narrative for the coalition: electricity system reform (HD03240), wind power (HD03239), environmental permitting (HD03238) = energy security agenda heading into election [A1].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling">Current Seat Projections (as of April 2026 polling)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling">Current Seat Projections (as of April 2026 polling)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Note: Based on polling aggregates — exact figures subject to polling error ±2–3 seats per party</em></p>
 
 
@@ -2155,7 +2155,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling">Current Seat Proje
 <strong>C pivot</strong>: ~20–28 seats</p>
 <p><em>4% threshold risk</em>: L near threshold; MP borderline</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd">Scenario Impact on Seats (from scenario-analysis.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd">Scenario Impact on Seats (from scenario-analysis.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2183,7 +2183,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd">Scenario Impact on
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Expected seat change</th><th>Winner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Scenario 1 (Accountability Breakthrough)</td><td>S +5–8, M -3–5</td><td>Opposition likely government</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario 2 (Narrative Containment)</td><td>No material change; C determines outcome</td><td>Coin toss</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario 3 (Opposition Fragmentation)</td><td>C aligns with Tidö post-election; Tidö continuation</td><td>Tidö re-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle">Electoral Risk Indicators for This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle">Electoral Risk Indicators for This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Svantesson interpellation answer quality</strong> [WATCH 2026-04-28]: Poor answer → S picks up 2–4 points in next poll</li>
 <li><strong>L threshold risk</strong>: Any L internal crisis + low polling → 4% threshold loss → Tidö loses 12–16 seats overnight</li>
@@ -2203,9 +2203,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle">Electoral Risk Indicators f
     Fuel tax consumer impact: [0.3, 0.5]
     Energy legislation: [0.2, 0.4]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2265,27 +2265,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag S
 <p><strong>Tidö governing majority</strong>: M+KD+L = 103 seats; with SD support = 176 seats (majority = 175)
 <strong>Opposition potential</strong>: S+V+MP = 149; needs C (24) for 173 — short of majority without SD or breakdown of Tidö</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026">Post-Election Scenario Mathematics (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support">Coalition A: Tidö Continuation (M+KD+L+SD support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026">Post-Election Scenario Mathematics (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support">Coalition A: Tidö Continuation (M+KD+L+SD support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires M+KD+L ≥ 100 + SD ≥ 70 → ≥ 175/349</li>
 <li>Current probability: MODERATE (scenario 2 → 55%)</li>
 <li>Risk: L drops below 4% threshold → Tidö loses 16 seats → falls to ~159/349 → minority without SD active support</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc">Coalition B: S-led alternative (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc">Coalition B: S-led alternative (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires S ≥ 95 + V ≥ 20 + MP ≥ 15 + C ≥ 24 → ≥ 154/349 (majority = 175 — falls short)</li>
 <li>S+V+MP+C needs more: requires either S >102 or C > 28 to reach 175</li>
 <li>Current probability: LOW-MODERATE; only viable under Scenario 1 (accountability breakthrough)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain">Coalition C: Grand Centre Bloc (M+C+L+S abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain">Coalition C: Grand Centre Bloc (M+C+L+S abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires M+C+L ≥ 115 (passive S abstention or confidence-and-supply)</li>
 <li>Historically rejected by Swedish political culture; not plausible without crisis</li>
 <li>Current probability: VERY LOW</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts">Today's Electoral Mathematics Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts">Today's Electoral Mathematics Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts">Today's Electoral Mathematics Sh
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Event</th><th>Direction</th><th>Seat impact estimate</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S accountability offensive (HD10444/443/445/446)</td><td>S +1–3% if KJ-1 materialises</td><td>+3–9 seats for S bloc [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48 fuel cut enacted</td><td>Coalition claim +0.5–1% with rural segment</td><td>+1–3 seats for Tidö [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>C deportation nuance (HD024095)</td><td>C towards independent pivot</td><td>C seat-share unchanged; coalition arithmetic risk</td></tr><tr><td>Energy legislation sprint</td><td>Coalition credibility signal</td><td>No immediate seat impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity">Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity">Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Critical 4% threshold parties</strong>: L (currently ~4.5%) and MP (currently ~3.8–4.2%)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>If L falls below 4%: Tidö coalition loses 16 seats → drops to ~159 with SD → below majority</li>
@@ -2333,34 +2333,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity">Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitiv
     line [175, 175, 175, 175]</pre>
 <p><em>Note: 175 = majority threshold. Tidö current projects above threshold; S bloc Scenario 1 projects below.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive">Segment 1: Rural/Commuter Voters (Fuel-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive">Segment 1: Rural/Commuter Voters (Fuel-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~800,000 households outside major metropolitan areas with daily car dependency (SCB transport survey estimate)
 <strong>Impact of HD01FiU48</strong>: DIRECT POSITIVE — 82 öre/litre visible at pump from May 1, 2026. Monthly saving for average commuter (~1,500 km/month, 7L/100km): approximately 87 SEK/month. Tangible but modest. [A2 SCB proxy]
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: Historically split between M/SD/C; this measure targets all three parties' core rural base
 <strong>Risk</strong>: C and M compete for this segment's credit; SD may claim insufficient relief</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive">Segment 2: Urban Progressive Voters (Climate-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive">Segment 2: Urban Progressive Voters (Climate-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: Stockholm/Gothenburg/Malmö metro — approximately 2.8 million voters
 <strong>Impact of HD01FiU48</strong>: NEGATIVE FRAMING — MP and V interpellations against fuel cut tap into this segment's climate anxiety. HD024098 (MP fuel tax motion) and HD024092 (V motion) directly represent this segment's opposition [A1]
 <strong>Impact of Energy legislation (HD03240/239)</strong>: MIXED — electricity system reform + wind power incentives play positively with this segment; coal → renewables framing resonates
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: S/MP/V core; some L and C voters</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive">Segment 3: Public Sector Workers (Accountability-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive">Segment 3: Public Sector Workers (Accountability-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~700,000 municipal and regional government employees
 <strong>Impact of HD10443</strong> (inter-municipal social welfare transfers): DIRECTLY RELEVANT — social workers and welfare administrators most aware of this policy failure [A1]
 <strong>Impact of HD10444</strong> (employer contributions to social dumping): Secondary relevance — fiscal solidarity frame resonates
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: S core voters; moderate turnout amplification if accountability narrative strengthens</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive">Segment 4: Youth and First-Time Voters (Agency/Justice-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive">Segment 4: Youth and First-Time Voters (Agency/Justice-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~300,000 voters aged 18–25 eligible for first time in 2026
 <strong>Impact of HD03246</strong> (unga lagöverträdare — youth criminal sentencing): DIRECTLY RELEVANT — reform of juvenile justice affects this cohort's peers; reactions split between accountability hawks (SD base) and rehabilitation advocates (S/V/MP base) [A1]
 <strong>Impact of eating disorder court case (HD10442)</strong>: Tangentially relevant — eating disorders disproportionately affect youth; governmental accountability on healthcare resonates</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive">Segment 5: Business Owners and Self-Employed (Economic-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive">Segment 5: Business Owners and Self-Employed (Economic-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~500,000 sole traders and SME owners registered in Bolagsverket (proxy)
 <strong>Impact of HD10444</strong> (employer contribution — S interpellation): COMPLEX — if employers are named as social dumping participants, this creates a defensive reaction in the broader business community even though the interpellation targets bad actors specifically. Risk of S being framed as anti-business [B2]
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: M/C core; some L voters</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic">Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic">Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     S1["Segment 1: Rural/Commuter&#x3C;br/>~800k HH&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48 POSITIVE"] -->|"Credit competition"| COAL["Coalition M+SD+C"]
     S2["Segment 2: Urban Progressive&#x3C;br/>~2.8M voters&#x3C;br/>Fuel cut NEGATIVE / Energy MIXED"] -->|"Mobilisation"| OPP["Opposition S+MP+V"]
@@ -2378,12 +2378,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic">Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmeti
     style PIVOT fill:#6a1b9a,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <p><strong>Net electoral vector</strong>: NEUTRAL to SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE for coalition among swing segments. S offensive mobilises public sector base (Segment 3) but risks Segment 5 backlash. HD01FiU48 benefits Segment 1 but C/SD/M split credit. Election outcome remains contingent on C pivot (see coalition-mathematics.md).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark (Nordic peer), Germany (EU large economy), United Kingdom (non-EU Westminster model)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure">Issue 1: Fuel Tax Cuts as Electoral Relief Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure">Issue 1: Fuel Tax Cuts as Electoral Relief Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2415,7 +2415,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure">Issue 1: Fuel Tax
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Recent Action</th><th>Comparator Evidence</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>82 öre/litre cut (HD01FiU48, 2026-04-21); temporary May–Sep 2026; EU minimum floor</td><td>Government used temporary relief framing, justified by Middle East conflict + high energy prices</td><td>riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>2022 Tankrabatt — 35 cents/litre cut for 3 months (June–August 2022)</td><td>Bundesregierung (Scholz) passed similar temporary fuel relief during Ukraine war energy shock; 3 billion EUR cost</td><td>bundesregierung.de (Tankrabatt 2022)</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>No direct fuel tax cut in 2022–2026 period; instead targeted heating subsidies</td><td>Denmark preferred household energy subsidies over transport fuel cuts; different income-group distribution</td><td>ft.dk (heating subsidies 2022)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden's approach most closely parallels Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt in structure (temporary, EU-minimum anchored, justified by external shock). Germany's Tankrabatt was heavily criticised by climate groups as distributional regressive and emissions-inefficient — same critique applies to HD01FiU48. However, the German precedent also shows temporary fuel cuts are generally accepted as legitimate emergency relief and do not produce permanent electoral realignment. Sweden's MP and V opposition (HD024098, HD024092) mirrors German Green/SPD-left criticism in 2022.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns">Issue 2: Parliamentary Accountability Interpellations — Ministerial Targeting Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns">Issue 2: Parliamentary Accountability Interpellations — Ministerial Targeting Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-tar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Pattern</th><th>Comparator Evidence</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>4 interpellations in 24 hours targeting one minister</td><td>Uncommon intensity; confirms coordinated campaign [B2]</td><td>riksdagen.se HD10444–446</td></tr><tr><td>United Kingdom</td><td>PMQs as equivalent weekly ministerial accountability</td><td>UK Opposition regularly "loads" PMQs with coordinated questions on one minister; 6 questions per session standard</td><td>UK Parliament Hansard</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Fragestunde — 60-question session monthly</td><td>Opposition groups coordinate thematic question clusters; equivalent pattern but slower pace</td><td>Bundestag Geschäftsordnung §105</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden's interpellation mechanism is more formally structured than UK PMQs but less frequent. The pattern of 4 interpellations in 24 hours targeting one minister (Svantesson) is the Swedish equivalent of a "PMQ blitz" — an intensification that signals pre-election political season has begun. This is normal behaviour for advanced democratic parliaments in election years; the analytical significance is the target selection (Svantesson, highest-profile fiscal figure) not the tactic itself.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative">Issue 3: Municipal Social Dumping — International Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative">Issue 3: Municipal Social Dumping — International Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative">Issue 3:
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Policy</th><th>Comparator Evidence</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>HD10443 — documented inter-municipal social welfare transfers without consent</td><td>No national law prohibiting informal municipal "recommendations" to residents to relocate</td><td>riksdagen.se HD10443</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Copenhagen municipality has used relocation incentive schemes for social housing</td><td>Controversial; subject to Parliamentary review 2019–2022; partial reform adopted</td><td>ft.dk social housing debates</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>Municipal residency requirements restrictions — ruled partly unconstitutional</td><td>Court ruling 2023 limited municipal power to block welfare recipients; social dumping concept present</td><td>rechtspraak.nl</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden is not alone in facing inter-municipal social welfare dumping dynamics. The Dutch and Danish precedents suggest that legislative solutions (residency protection laws) are technically feasible but politically contested when municipal autonomy interests collide with central welfare state principles. The HD10443 interpellation raises a genuine governance gap that any post-2026 government will need to address.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     SE["🇸🇪 Sweden&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48 fuel cut&#x3C;br/>HD10444 accountability&#x3C;br/>HD10443 social dumping"] --> NORM["Nordic/EU norm check"]
     DE["🇩🇪 Germany&#x3C;br/>Tankrabatt 2022&#x3C;br/>precedent"] --> NORM
@@ -2499,9 +2499,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
     style OUT2 fill:#f57f17,color:#000000
     style OUT3 fill:#e65100,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election">Parallel 1: The 1994 Fuel Tax Cut Pre-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election">Parallel 1: The 1994 Fuel Tax Cut Pre-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical event</strong>: In spring 1994, the Bildt government (M-led) faced mounting economic pressure and introduced limited energy cost relief measures before the September 1994 election. The economic crisis context (Sweden's 1990s banking crisis) dominated the campaign. The government lost; S returned to power.</p>
 <p><strong>Parallels to 2026</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election">Parallel 1: The 1994 F
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: 1994 crisis was far more severe (banking system collapse, currency peg collapse). 2026 context is inflationary pressure post-COVID/Ukraine, not systemic financial crisis. The relief measure's electoral effectiveness is therefore less certain to be overwhelmed by wider crisis dynamics.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2] — historical parallel based on secondary sources; direct documentation available in Riksdagsbiblioteket</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government">Parallel 2: 2018 SD Accountability Interpellations Against Löfven Government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government">Parallel 2: 2018 SD Accountability Interpellations Against Löfven Government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical event</strong>: In the pre-election period of spring 2018, SD filed a cluster of accountability interpellations targeting S Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson on migration costs. The interpellations received moderate media coverage. SD picked up seats in September 2018 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Parallels to 2026</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2523,7 +2523,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-gov
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: SD in 2018 targeted Andersson on immigration/costs — a domain where SD had comparative advantage. S in 2026 targets Svantesson on labour market exploitation and welfare fraud — a domain where S traditionally has credibility. S's strategic positioning is arguably stronger than SD's was in 2018 on these issues.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2] — interpellation records available in riksdagen.se but specific 2018 cluster not independently verified in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint">Parallel 3: 2010 Reinfeldt Alliansen Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint">Parallel 3: 2010 Reinfeldt Alliansen Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical event</strong>: In spring 2010, the Reinfeldt Alliansen government (M+C+KD+FP) filed a substantial pre-election legislative package covering work-life reforms, infrastructure, and social insurance modifications. The "work-first" narrative dominated the campaign. Alliansen won re-election with an increased mandate.</p>
 <p><strong>Parallels to 2026</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2534,7 +2534,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint">Parallel 3: 2
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: 2010 Alliansen had a more unified single economic narrative ("the work-first society") than the current Tidö coalition which spans from nationalist-conservative (SD) to liberal (L) on social policy.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2] — parallel based on well-documented 2010 campaign record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-lessons-for-2026">Historical Lessons for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-lessons-for-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-lessons-for-2026">Historical Lessons for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-lessons-for-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2578,10 +2578,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-lessons-for-2026">Historical Lessons for 2026<a class="" a
         Energy legislation sprint : April 2026 - submitted
         Election 13 September 2026 : Outcome TBD</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessments">Feasibility Assessments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01">1. HD01FiU48 — Extra Budget / Fuel Tax Cut (Effective 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessments">Feasibility Assessments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01">1. HD01FiU48 — Extra Budget / Fuel Tax Cut (Effective 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation status</strong>: ENACTED (Riksdag vote 2026-04-21) [A1]
 <strong>Technical feasibility</strong>: HIGH — fuel tax adjustment via Energiskattelagen. Skatteverket has existing mechanisms for overnight tax rate change.
 <strong>Operational risk</strong>: LOW — logistics pre-notified to fuel retailers; automatic pump price adjustment follows normal supplier pricing cycle
@@ -2589,26 +2589,26 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01">1. HD01
 <strong>Political risk</strong>: LOW for implementation; HIGH for attribution (opposition will challenge whether fuel prices actually drop at pump)
 <strong>GDPR/legal risk</strong>: NONE — straightforward tax law amendment
 <strong>Residual risk</strong>: Pump price lag (retailers adjust prices weekly not daily; 82 öre saving may be invisible in first week post-May 1) → media expectation management needed</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform">2. HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet (Electricity System Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform">2. HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet (Electricity System Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation status</strong>: SUBMITTED to Riksdag 2026-04-14; awaiting committee report [A1]
 <strong>Technical feasibility</strong>: MODERATE — systemic reform of electricity market regulation requires Energimyndigheten implementation framework
 <strong>Operational risk</strong>: MODERATE — new market rules require grid operator coordination (Svenska kraftnät)
 <strong>Timeline risk</strong>: MODERATE — committee report needed by June 2026; Riksdag vote before summer recess; if deferred to autumn, implementation begins after election under (possibly different) government
 <strong>Political risk</strong>: LOW-MODERATE — energy system reform has broad support; SD's nuclear preference adds complexity but does not block passage
 <strong>Residual risk</strong>: Election calendar risk — reform adopted May/June but implemented September+ means a different government may administer it</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain">3. HD10444–HD10446 Interpellation Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain">3. HD10444–HD10446 Interpellation Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation feasibility</strong>: N/A — interpellations are accountability instruments, not legislation
 <strong>Response feasibility</strong>: Svantesson must provide substantive answers to all 3 within the standard interpellation debate window (approximately 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05)
 <strong>Preparation risk</strong>: HIGH — three separate domains (employer contributions, social dumping, false death records) require cross-ministry briefing in 6 days
 <strong>Procedural timeline</strong>: Interpellation filed → speaker schedules debate → minister answers → follow-up questions → debate ends
 <strong>Risk of non-answer</strong>: LOW — Swedish parliamentary convention requires minister to engage substantively; refusal to answer is a political cost signal</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform">4. HD03246 — Unga lagöverträdare (Youth Offender Sentencing Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform">4. HD03246 — Unga lagöverträdare (Youth Offender Sentencing Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation status</strong>: SUBMITTED to Riksdag 2026-04-16 [A1]
 <strong>Technical feasibility</strong>: HIGH — judicial reform with clear Domstolsverket implementation pathway
 <strong>Timeline risk</strong>: MODERATE — committee review Justitieutskottet; expected vote May/June 2026
 <strong>Social risk</strong>: MODERATE — reforms to juvenile justice generate civil society pushback; youth rights organisations active</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-risk-summary">Feasibility Risk Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-risk-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-risk-summary">Feasibility Risk Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-risk-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2677,34 +2677,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-risk-summary">Feasibility Risk Summary<a class="" aria-hi
     section Post-election
         HD01KU33/32 constitutional       :crit, 2026-09-15, 2027-03-01</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment">Hypothesis H1: S Accountability Offensive Is Election-Year Strategy (Primary Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment">Hypothesis H1: S Accountability Offensive Is Election-Year Strategy (Primary Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: 4 interpellations in 24 hours, same MP authorship cluster, identical Svantesson targeting pattern, timing (5 months before September 2026 election) [A1]
 <strong>Evidence against</strong>: Interpellations are a standard parliamentary tool used continuously throughout the term; the 2026-04-22 cluster may coincide with end-of-session filing deadline, not strategic choice [A2]
 <strong>ACH weight</strong>: Strong evidence for [A1]; weak countervailing evidence [A2] → H1 stands as primary</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering">Hypothesis H2: Fuel Tax Cut (HD01FiU48) Is Genuine Emergency Relief, Not Electioneering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering">Hypothesis H2: Fuel Tax Cut (HD01FiU48) Is Genuine Emergency Relief, Not Electioneering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: FiU48 cites EU energy market conditions, Middle East conflict impacts, inflation spike — all documented real-world triggers [A1]; the measure stays at EU minimum floor, not a maximum cut [A2]
 <strong>Evidence against</strong>: Timing (May 2026 start = 4 months before election) suggests electoral calendar influence; no sunset clause makes "temporary" framing weak [B2]; climate expert consensus is that fuel tax cuts are regressive and emission-inefficient [B2]
 <strong>ACH weight</strong>: Mixed [B2+B2] — both emergency relief AND electoral relief are likely simultaneously true; neither hypothesis excludes the other</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on">Hypothesis H3: Slottner/Carlson Interpellations (HD10445/HD10446) Represent New Accountability Fronts, Not Follow-On<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on">Hypothesis H3: Slottner/Carlson Interpellations (HD10445/HD10446) Represent New Accountability Fronts, Not Follow-On<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: Slottner (HD10445, social dumping/KD) and Carlson (HD10446, false death declarations/KD) raise completely different policy domains than Svantesson's financial/fiscal domain [A1]; different S MP authors [A1]
 <strong>Evidence against</strong>: All 4 interpellations filed same day by S MPs — coordination signal regardless of domain [A1]; S parliamentary group coordination meetings would explain simultaneous filing [A2]
 <strong>ACH weight</strong>: H3 (independent fronts) has some support but H1 (coordinated campaign) is more parsimonious given same-day filing [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong">Competing Hypotheses — What Could This Analysis Get Wrong?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire">Red Team Challenge 1: "The Accountability Offensive Will Backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong">Competing Hypotheses — What Could This Analysis Get Wrong?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire">Red Team Challenge 1: "The Accountability Offensive Will Backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate argument</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson has survived multiple media cycles including the 2025 budget controversy. S has limited ability to convert interpellation success into vote-switching because their core voters are already committed, and the swingable voters (C, L-leaning) are more concerned about welfare state competence than about ministerial accountability theatrics. HD10444 (employer contributions to social dumping employers) may alienate the very small-business and self-employed voters S needs to win back.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge</strong>: Poll data showing S polling above 31% after the interpellation cycle; media coverage classified as "accountability" not "theatre" by neutral outlets [B2 required].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect">Red Team Challenge 2: "HD01FiU48 Has No Electoral Effect"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect">Red Team Challenge 2: "HD01FiU48 Has No Electoral Effect"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate argument</strong>: Fuel tax cuts are politically effective only when consumers see an immediate visible effect at the pump. The 82 öre/litre cut (approximately 8 kr per tankful for a typical car) is smaller than normal pump price volatility (10–15 kr/L swings). Voters do not attribute diffuse tax cuts to specific government decisions. The fuel tax cut will be invisible in election-day retrospective assessments.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge</strong>: Swedish consumer sentiment data showing government approval increase in May 2026 fuel period [B2 required]; or alternatively, opposition research showing the cut is too small to matter (which would validate this red team challenge).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story">Red Team Challenge 3: "The Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU33/32) Are the Real Long-Term Story"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story">Red Team Challenge 3: "The Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU33/32) Are the Real Long-Term Story"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate argument</strong>: The realtime monitor analysis is over-indexing on visible interpellation drama and underweighting the structural constitutional amendments (HD01KU33/32) that require a post-2026 election second vote. These amendments — which may concern fundamental rights or electoral rules — will have lasting effects far beyond the current legislative session. The interpellation cycle is ephemeral; the constitutional amendments are permanent.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge</strong>: Read HD01KU33 and HD01KU32 full text to assess whether they concern electoral mechanisms or fundamental rights (which would elevate their significance rating); currently assessed [B2] due to title-only review.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-summary-table">ACH Summary Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-summary-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-summary-table">ACH Summary Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-summary-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2761,10 +2761,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-summary-table">ACH Summary Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Evidence For</th><th>Evidence Against</th><th>ACH Weight</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1: S offensive = election strategy</td><td>[A1] 4 interpel. same day, Svantesson × 3</td><td>[A2] end-of-session filing deadline</td><td>Strong</td><td><strong>SUPPORTED</strong></td></tr><tr><td>H2: FiU48 = emergency relief</td><td>[A1] EU energy conditions, inflation</td><td>[B2] electoral timing, weak sunset</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>PARTIAL — dual motive likely</strong></td></tr><tr><td>H3: Slottner/Carlson = independent fronts</td><td>[A1] different domains</td><td>[A1] same-day S filing</td><td>Weak</td><td><strong>REJECTED — coordination more parsimonious</strong></td></tr><tr><td>RC1: S offensive backfires</td><td>[B2] Svantesson survival history</td><td>[B2] poll evidence needed</td><td>TBD</td><td><strong>WATCH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>RC2: FiU48 invisible electorally</td><td>[B2] pump-price volatility argument</td><td>[B2] consumer sentiment needed</td><td>TBD</td><td><strong>WATCH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>RC3: Constitutional amendments underweighted</td><td>[B2] structural long-term</td><td>[B2] requires full text review</td><td>TBD</td><td><strong>FLAG for follow-on</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions">Classification Framework (7 Dimensions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimensions">Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions">Classification Framework (7 Dimensions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimensions">Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimensions"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Policy Domain</strong> — Primary policy area</li>
 <li><strong>Political Valence</strong> — Partisan direction (government/opposition/cross-party)</li>
@@ -2775,8 +2775,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimensions">Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li><strong>Retention</strong> — Analytical retention period</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classifications">Document Classifications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classifications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation">HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgift Abuse [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classifications">Document Classifications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classifications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation">HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgift Abuse [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2815,7 +2815,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation">HD10444 — Arbetsgi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Fiscal policy / Labour market</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition attack (S → M coalition)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed — awaiting ministerial answer</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>IMMEDIATE — debate scheduled within 2 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — core fiscal credibility narrative for Election 2026</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed; Data minimisation applied</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>5 years (electoral significance)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation">HD10443 — Social Dumpning [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation">HD10443 — Social Dumpning [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2854,7 +2854,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation">HD10443 — Social Dumpning
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Social welfare / Municipal governance</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition (S → KD)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>IMMEDIATE</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — welfare state protection narrative</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>5 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation">HD10445 — Housing Pre-emption [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation">HD10445 — Housing Pre-emption [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2893,7 +2893,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation">HD10445 — Housing Pre-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Housing policy / Urban segregation</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition (S → KD)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>NEAR-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — Stockholm suburban segregation</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>5 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation">HD10446 — False Death Declarations [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation">HD10446 — False Death Declarations [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2932,7 +2932,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation">HD10446 — False D
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Civil administration / Skatteverket</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition (S → M)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>NEAR-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>MEDIUM — administrative competence framing</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(g) public interest; data minimisation</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>3 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget [Betänkande ENACTED]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget [Betänkande ENACTED]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2971,7 +2971,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted">HD01FiU48 — E
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Fiscal policy / Energy pricing</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Cross-party (M+SD+KD+L+C majority)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td><strong>Enacted</strong> — 2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>HIGH — takes effect 2026-05-01</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — government relief narrative</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>N/A (legislative, no personal data)</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Permanent (legislative record)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition">HD03240 — Nya Lagar om Elsystemet [Proposition]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition">HD03240 — Nya Lagar om Elsystemet [Proposition]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3010,7 +3010,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition">HD03240 — Nya Lagar o
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Energy policy / Electricity system</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Proposition submitted — committee review pending</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>MEDIUM-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — energy security + climate narratives</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Permanent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions">HD03232/HD03231 — Ukraine Tribunals [Propositions]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions">HD03232/HD03231 — Ukraine Tribunals [Propositions]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3050,22 +3050,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions">HD03232/HD03231 — U
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Foreign affairs / International law</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Government (broad consensus expected)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Propositions submitted</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>MEDIUM-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>MEDIUM — Sweden's Ukraine solidarity stance</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Permanent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-classification">Priority Tier Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-classification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring">Tier P0 — Highest Priority (immediate monitoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-classification">Priority Tier Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-classification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring">Tier P0 — Highest Priority (immediate monitoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10444, HD10443, HD10445 (interpellations targeting ministers)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate">Tier P1 — High Priority (track through committee/debate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate">Tier P1 — High Priority (track through committee/debate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 (enacted — implementation monitoring)</li>
 <li>HD03240 (new electricity system law — committee)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p2--standard-priority">Tier P2 — Standard Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--standard-priority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p2--standard-priority">Tier P2 — Standard Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--standard-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03232, HD03231, HD03246, HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD03242</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-information-access-control">Information Access Control<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-access-control"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-access-control">Information Access Control<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-access-control"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents: <strong>Public access</strong> (Offentlighetsprincipen — Swedish Freedom of the Press Act)</li>
 <li>Source: data.riksdagen.se (official open data)</li>
@@ -3083,53 +3083,53 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-access-control">Information Access Control<a class="" ari
     style TRACK fill:#f57f17,color:#000000
     style REVIEW fill:#1976d2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence">Cluster A — Fiscal &#x26; Economic Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence">Cluster A — Fiscal &#x26; Economic Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 ↔ HD03236 (Extra budget prop.) ↔ HD024098/092 (opposition motions)</li>
 <li>HD10444 ↔ employer contribution reduction (enacted April 2026) ↔ Aftonbladet investigation</li>
 <li>Cluster logic: The fuel tax relief and employer contribution policy share the same fiscal instrument (tax reduction for economic stimulus) and the same accountability vulnerability (risk of exploitation)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package">Cluster B — Ukraine Diplomatic Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package">Cluster B — Ukraine Diplomatic Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03232 ↔ HD03231 (both Utrikesdepartementet, both 2026-04-16)</li>
 <li>Both represent Sweden's commitment to Ukraine's transitional justice architecture</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: Sweden's NATO membership context (ratified 2024) amplifies the diplomatic significance</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition">Cluster C — Energy &#x26; Climate Transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition">Cluster C — Energy &#x26; Climate Transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03240 (Nya lagar om elsystemet) ↔ HD03239 (Vindkraft i kommuner) ↔ HD03238 (Ny miljöprövningsmyndighet)</li>
 <li>Three-part energy reform package submitted April 13–14, 2026</li>
 <li>Thematic coherence: electricity system law + wind power incentives + environmental permitting reform</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today">Cluster D — Parliamentary Accountability (Today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today">Cluster D — Parliamentary Accountability (Today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10444 ↔ HD10443 ↔ HD10445 ↔ HD10446 (all S interpellations, 2026-04-22)</li>
 <li>HD10442 (filed 2026-04-21, S/Svantesson eating disorder)</li>
 <li>Cluster logic: 5 interpellations in 2 days, 3 targeting Svantesson = coordinated S campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform">Cluster E — Constitutional Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform">Cluster E — Constitutional Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01KU33 ↔ HD01KU32 (both KU betänkanden, both constitutional amendments first reading, 2026-04-17)</li>
 <li>Both require second vote after 2026 election to become law — creates a post-election governance agenda</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief">Chain 1: Fuel Tax Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief">Chain 1: Fuel Tax Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>prop. 2025/26:236 (HD03236) →
 FiU48 (HD01FiU48, adopted 2026-04-21) →
 Law amendment (effective 2026-05-01) →
 Opposition motions HD024098/092 (overridden)
 </code></pre>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform">Chain 2: Energy System Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform">Chain 2: Energy System Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>prop. 2025/26:240 (HD03240) →
 prop. 2025/26:239 (HD03239) →
 prop. 2025/26:238 (HD03238) →
 Committee review (pending)
 </code></pre>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability">Chain 3: Ministerial Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability">Chain 3: Ministerial Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>Past Svantesson statements →
 Aftonbladet investigation →
 HD10444 interpellation (2026-04-22) →
@@ -3137,33 +3137,33 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability">Chain 3: Ministerial Accountabili
 [Potential KU review]
 </code></pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations">Sibling Folders — Tier-C Cross-Type Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations">Sibling Folders — Tier-C Cross-Type Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD03100 (vårproposition), HD03236 (extra budget), HD03240 (el-system), HD03239 (vindkraft), HD03238 (miljöprövning), HD03246 (unga), HD03231/232 (Ukraina)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: Propositions cluster C (energy reform) and cluster B (Ukraine) directly feed this realtime analysis</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "What is the coalition's energy security legislative timetable before September 2026 election?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD024082–HD024098 (fuel tax opposition, deportation, arms)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: S/V/MP triple fuel tax rejection (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) establishes the opposition's climate-fiscal dividing line</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "How will opposition parties exploit the fuel tax cut in the election campaign?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD01FiU48 (extra budget ENACTED), HD01KU33/32 (constitutional), HD01CU27/28 (housing)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: HD01FiU48 enacted — direct cause of today's accountability interpellations</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "When will KU constitutional amendments (KU33/32) come to second reading post-election?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD10442–HD10446 (S accountability offensive)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: HD10442 (eating disorder, filed 2026-04-21) is the pre-existing live risk that today's new interpellations reinforce</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "Is the S accountability strategy a one-day event or a sustained multi-week campaign?"</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S interpellation cluster</strong>: 4 interpellations in 24 hours, all authored by S MPs, all targeting coalition ministers on documented past statements or policy failures — clear coordination indicator [B2]</li>
 <li><strong>S+V+MP fuel tax motions</strong>: Three parties simultaneously filed fuel tax rejection motions on the same proposition — opportunistic coordination, not pre-planned (motions filed on different days but same legislative target) [B2]</li>
@@ -3181,11 +3181,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-Activity Patterns<a class=
     style IP fill:#e53935,color:#FFFFFF
     style RT fill:#c62828,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Standard</strong>: ICD 203 + Admiralty Code + SAT Catalog
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Cycle</strong>: Realtime-2338</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3243,7 +3243,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Standard</th><th>Implementation in This Cycle</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1: Accurately describe quality and reliability of underlying sources</td><td>All claims tagged [A1] (direct API), [A2] (confirmed secondary), [B2] (reported/inferred). Admiralty code applied per evidence type.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-2: Properly caveat analytic assessments</td><td>KJ-1/2/3 carry WEP band labels; PIR-2 explicitly states UNCERTAIN; KJ-2 uses MODERATE not HIGH.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-3: Distinguish between underlying intelligence and analyst judgment</td><td>Data retrieval (dok_id, titles, dates) separated from interpretive analysis (significance scoring, cluster logic).</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-4: Avoid analytical assumptions with insufficient basis</td><td>RC2 (fuel tax electoral impact) explicitly deferred to observable outcome; constitutional amendments (PIR-5) flagged for full-text review before rating.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-5: Incorporate alternative hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>ACH matrix in devils-advocate.md with 3 primary + 3 red team hypotheses; probability distribution in scenario-analysis.md.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-6: Articulate and explain change in analytic judgments</td><td>Prior-cycle PIR ingestion table in intelligence-assessment.md shows what changed from sibling cycle analysis. "Sustained campaign" upgraded from WATCH to ACTIVE based on today's 4 interpellations.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-7: Identify information gaps that could affect judgments</td><td>PIR-4 (consumer response), PIR-5 (KU33/32 full text), RC1/RC2/RC3 evidentiary requirements all stated.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-8: Use consistent, unambiguous language with WEP terms</td><td>WEP terminology applied: "Almost certain" (KJ-3), "Likely" (KJ-1), "Roughly even" (KJ-2). No use of forbidden terms like "probable."</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-9: Properly coordinate, acknowledge disagreement with other analysts</td><td>No other analyst team in this run; Tier-C sibling synthesis acknowledged and cited.</td><td>✅ Met (single analyst acknowledged)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</strong>: Applied in devils-advocate.md — 3 hypotheses + 3 red team challenges with evidentiary requirements specified.</li>
 <li><strong>Scenario analysis</strong>: 3 scenarios (breakthrough, containment, fragmentation) with probability distribution summing to 100% in scenario-analysis.md.</li>
@@ -3257,7 +3257,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied">Structured Analytic Techn
 <li><strong>Probability calibration</strong>: WEP 7-band scale applied consistently with Admiralty source quality codes.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified">Methodology Improvements (Pass 2 Identified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified">Methodology Improvements (Pass 2 Identified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Improve KJ-2 confidence</strong>: KJ-2 (fuel tax electoral impact) is currently MODERATE because consumer response is unobservable. Next cycle should include SCB CPI data or consumer confidence indices from the SCB MCP server to provide a quantitative anchor.</p>
@@ -3270,7 +3270,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified">Methodology Improvements
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-limitations">Data Quality Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-limitations">Data Quality Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-limitations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3303,10 +3303,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-quality-limitations">Data Quality Limitations<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Limitation</th><th>Impact</th><th>Mitigation applied</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>No full-text for all propositions (title + summary only)</td><td>KJ-3 confidence based on submission count, not content review</td><td>Flagged in data-download-manifest.md</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional amendments (HD01KU33/32) title-only</td><td>PIR-5 not rated</td><td>Explicitly deferred to follow-on</td></tr><tr><td>Consumer sentiment post-FiU48 not yet observable</td><td>KJ-2 capped at MODERATE</td><td>WEP MODERATE label applied</td></tr><tr><td>No vote record available for 2026-04-22 data</td><td>Voting patterns inferred from opposition motions</td><td>Cross-referenced with motion filing records [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-1">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-1"></a></h3>
 <p>All analysis in this cycle follows the osint-tradecraft-standards.md canon: ICD 203 audit above confirms 9/9 standards applied. Admiralty codes are [A1] (authoritative, confirmed), [A2] (authoritative, probably true), [B2] (reliable, probably true), [B3] (reliable, possibly true) — no fabricated or unrated claims committed to artifact files. PIR handoff to next cycle documented in intelligence-assessment.md §Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion with full resolution status.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-realtime-monitor
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24808210801
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-22T23:38:00Z
@@ -3314,13 +3314,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Effective Date</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Subfolder</strong>: realtime-2338</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering: <strong>LIVE</strong> (verified via get_sync_status at 23:38:04Z)</li>
 <li>scb: available</li>
 <li>world-bank: available</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-breaking-news-signals-detected">Breaking News Signals Detected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-breaking-news-signals-detected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-breaking-news-signals-detected">Breaking News Signals Detected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-breaking-news-signals-detected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3352,8 +3352,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-breaking-news-signals-detected">Breaking News Signals Detected<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Priority</th><th>Category</th><th>Count</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CRITICAL</td><td>Today's interpellations</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td>Committee betänkanden (2026-04-21/22)</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td>Recent propositions (2026-04-14–16)</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition motions on prop. 2025/26:236</td><td>5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-document-index">Document Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-index"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking">Primary: Today's Interpellations (2026-04-22) — Breaking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-index">Document Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-index"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking">Primary: Today's Interpellations (2026-04-22) — Breaking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3400,7 +3400,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking">Primary: Today's
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Author</th><th>Target Minister</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar</td><td>Åsa Eriksson (S)</td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt av nyckelfastigheter</td><td>Markus Kallifatides (S)</td><td>Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td>Jonathan Svensson (S)</td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>Peder Björk (S)</td><td>Erik Slottner (KD)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21">Secondary: Recent Betänkanden (2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21">Secondary: Recent Betänkanden (2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3449,7 +3449,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21">Secondary: Recent Betänkan
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Committee</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 — bränsle/el/gas</td><td>FiU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning</td><td>TU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport — jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>MJU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17">Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17">Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3498,7 +3498,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17">Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Committee</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar vid husrannsakan</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU42</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport — dödsbon</td><td>CU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>CU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart</td><td>CU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416">Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416">Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3577,7 +3577,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416">Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Department</th><th>Date</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Nya krav på interoperabilitet — datadelning</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>Landsbygdsdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Sveriges anslutning till aggressionstribunalen för Ukraina</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>Klimat- och näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>Klimat- och näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>Klimat- och näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517">Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517">Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3672,19 +3672,50 @@ <h3 id="rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517">Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Party</th><th>Dok-typ</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra budget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt (avslag)</td><td>MP</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra budget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt (avslag)</td><td>V</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler (avslag)</td><td>MP</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler (delvis)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler (avslag)</td><td>V</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>Krigsmaterielexport (förbud)</td><td>MP</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>Krigsmaterielexport (avslag)</td><td>V</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024094</td><td>Kommunal hälso- och sjukvård (delvis avslag)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024093</td><td>Cybersäkerhetscenter (komplettering)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024089</td><td>Ny mottagandelag (kommunalt stöd)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/ — 15 docs incl. vårproposition HD03100</li>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/ — 20 docs incl. HD024082–HD024098</li>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/ — 10 docs incl. HD01FiU48</li>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/ — 5 docs incl. HD10442–HD10446</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents retrieved from data.riksdagen.se via riksdag-regering MCP server</li>
 <li>Full text not fetched for all documents (metadata-only for most)</li>
 <li>Sibling folder synthesis summaries read for Tier-C cross-reference</li>
 <li>No lookback required — documents confirmed for 2026-04-22</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3735,7 +3766,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:09.252Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:30.684Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html b/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html
index 0953ff1374..a034e55038 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Riksdag Realtime Monitor">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.433Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.863Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.433Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:30.863Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-22T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Realtime Monitor","description":"The Swedish Riksdag enters the final pre-election legislative sprint with three simultaneous breaking-news vectors: (1) the Social Democrats have launched a coordinated four-interpellation…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:09.433Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Riksdag Realtime Monitor","description":"The Swedish Riksdag enters the final pre-election legislative sprint with three simultaneous breaking-news vectors: (1) the Social Democrats have launched a coordinated four-interpellation…","datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:30.863Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-22-realtime-2338-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10443-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10444-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10445-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10446-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,20 +216,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>The Swedish Riksdag enters the final pre-election legislative sprint with three simultaneous breaking-news vectors: (1) the Social Democrats have launched a coordinated four-interpellation accountability offensive against Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) and coalition partners on 2026-04-22, targeting weaknesses in labour, housing, social welfare and civil administration ahead of September 2026 election; (2) the extra supplementary budget cutting fuel taxes was adopted by Riksdag on 2026-04-21, with opposition split along climate-economic lines; and (3) a cluster of substantive propositions on energy, forestry, justice and Ukraine diplomacy signals the Kristersson government's accelerating legislative agenda in the final session before dissolution.</p>
 <p>The S accountability offensive — three separate interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson alone — is the highest-urgency political intelligence signal of the evening. This pattern of multi-vector parliamentary pressure on a single minister indicates a coordinated pre-election strategy to force ministerial missteps in public answers.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial decision</strong>: Whether to cover the S accountability offensive as a unified political story (coordinated attack on Svantesson) or as separate interpellations — the unified framing is analytically stronger.</li>
 <li><strong>Monitoring priority</strong>: Whether to escalate tracking on the employer contribution exploitation case (HD10444) given the Aftonbladet reporting connection — HIGH priority recommended.</li>
 <li><strong>Forecast horizon</strong>: Whether the extra budget fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48 passed) will produce measurable opposition climate-narrative gains ahead of the June budget debate — track via media framing metrics next 7 days.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S triple-strike on Svantesson</strong> [B2]: HD10444 (employer contribution abuse), HD10442 (eating disorder court case), HD10446 (false death declarations) — three vectors simultaneously</li>
 <li><strong>HD10445 housing</strong>: S targets government failure on pre-emption rights for key properties in Stockholm suburbs (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) — segregation policy vector [B2]</li>
@@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Election 2026 lens</strong>: Every interpellation is targeted at a named minister — this is debate-priming for the election campaign</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">📅 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">📅 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</strong>: Ministerial answers to the four interpellations will be debated in the Riksdag chamber. Svantesson's responses to HD10442 (eating disorder court case) and HD10444 (employer contributions) carry the highest media-volatility risk. A single factually contested answer could become the week's dominant political story ahead of the June budget debate.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-label">🔍 Confidence Label<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-label"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-label">🔍 Confidence Label<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-label"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Overall assessment confidence</strong>: HIGH [B2] — based on direct MCP retrieval of parliamentary documents and cross-reference with today's sibling analysis folders (propositions, motions, committeeReports, interpellations).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--intelligence-landscape-map">📊 Intelligence Landscape Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--intelligence-landscape-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-landscape-map">📊 Intelligence Landscape Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-landscape-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     BREAK["⚡ BREAKING 2026-04-22&#x3C;br/>Realtime-2338 Monitor"] --> A1["S Accountability Offensive&#x3C;br/>4 interpellations filed&#x3C;br/>CRITICAL priority"]
     BREAK --> A2["FiU48 enacted&#x3C;br/>Fuel tax cut in force&#x3C;br/>HIGH impact"]
@@ -277,17 +277,17 @@ <h2 id="rm--intelligence-landscape-map">📊 Intelligence Landscape Map<a class=
     style C2 fill:#1565c0,color:#FFFFFF
     style C3 fill:#1565c0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-22 | <strong>Subfolder</strong>: realtime-2338
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Methodology</strong>: synthesis-methodology.md, ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v6.4
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY STORY</strong>: Social Democrats launch coordinated four-interpellation accountability offensive against the Kristersson coalition on 2026-04-22, with three interpellations targeting Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) in a single day. The employer contribution exploitation case (HD10444) — based on Aftonbladet reporting that retailers diverted the youth employment tax relief into profits rather than new jobs — delivers the sharpest fiscal-policy attack vector ahead of the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY STORY</strong>: The extra supplementary budget (HD01FiU48) was enacted by Riksdag on 2026-04-21 with cross-party support, cutting fuel taxes by 82 öre/litre from 1 May 2026. Despite opposition motions from MP, V, and S (HD024098, HD024092), the coalition prevailed. This signals the government's pre-election energy-cost relief narrative is successfully deployed.</p>
 <p><strong>TERTIARY STORY</strong>: A cluster of five major propositions submitted on 2026-04-14–16 — including new electricity system laws (HD03240), youth offender sentencing reform (HD03246), and dual Ukraine diplomatic instruments (HD03231, HD03232) — demonstrate the government's accelerating legislative push in the final pre-election session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -405,18 +405,18 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ra
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Document</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD10444</td><td>Arbetsgivaravgift abuse → Svantesson</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning → Slottner (KD)</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Housing pre-emption rights → Carlson (KD)</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD10446</td><td>False death declarations → Svantesson</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra budget: fuel+el+gas (ENACTED)</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.7</strong></td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Unga lagöverträdare — sentencing reform</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine damage commission entry</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine aggression tribunal</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Husrannsakan secrecy — constitution</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.7</strong></td><td>L2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>The realtime intelligence picture on the evening of 2026-04-22 shows <strong>four concurrent political dynamics</strong>:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical">1. Pre-Election Accountability War (CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical">1. Pre-Election Accountability War (CRITICAL)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-accountability-war-critical"></a></h4>
 <p>Socialdemokraterna are executing a deliberate multi-vector ministerial accountability strategy. The selection of three interpellations targeting Svantesson — the government's most prominent fiscal figure — reflects S research into her past statements on employer contributions (HD10444: Aftonbladet confirmed 20+ retailers diverted the relief), the eating disorder court case (HD10442: court vindication of Region Stockholm), and the Skatteverket false death registration failures (HD10446). Admiralty source: [A1] — all from riksdagen.se direct API.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high">2. Budget Enacted — Relief Narrative Active (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high">2. Budget Enacted — Relief Narrative Active (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-budget-enacted--relief-narrative-active-high"></a></h4>
 <p>The coalition secured passage of HD01FiU48 despite cross-party opposition, establishing a "government cuts your fuel costs" narrative for the summer driving season (1 May–30 September 2026). S/V/MP objection through motions is now <strong>overridden</strong> — the relief is law. [A1]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high">3. Legislative Sprint — Energy and Security Cluster (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high">3. Legislative Sprint — Energy and Security Cluster (HIGH)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-legislative-sprint--energy-and-security-cluster-high"></a></h4>
 <p>The April 14–16 proposition cluster reveals a policy agenda accelerating toward the election: energy laws, forestry liberalisation, arms regulation, Ukraine diplomacy, and youth crime — all areas with documented electoral salience. [A2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium">4. Opposition Fragmentation (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium">4. Opposition Fragmentation (MEDIUM)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-opposition-fragmentation-medium"></a></h4>
 <p>On deportation (HD024095) and medical care (HD024094), Centerpartiet is attempting to amend rather than reject government proposals — signalling the C's continued attempt to position itself as a responsible alternative at the political centre rather than aligning with S/V/MP on full rejection. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Collection method</strong>: riksdag-regering MCP server (live, verified at 23:38Z). Source authority [A] for all riksdagen.se-origin documents. Completeness [2] — documents cover today's interpellations fully; committee betänkanden covers last 5 days; propositions from past 8 days. Cross-reference with four sibling analysis folders (propositions, motions, committeeReports, interpellations) from today's analysis/daily/2026-04-22/ tree.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Signal vs. Urgency — Realtime Monitor 2026-04-22
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style HD10444 fill:#c62828,color:#fff
     style HD01FiU48 fill:#e65100,color:#fff
     style HD10443 fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SEO title</strong> (EN): "Sweden's Social Democrats Triple-Target Finance Minister Svantesson in Pre-Election Parliamentary Offensive"</li>
 <li><strong>SEO title</strong> (SV): "S triplerar attack mot finansminister Svantesson i förvalspolitisk offensiv"</li>
@@ -447,46 +447,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>Slug</strong>: breaking-2026-04-22</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Sources</strong>: Riksdag API [A1], Sibling Analysis [A2]
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Confidence</strong>: See per-KJ labels | <strong>Cycle</strong>: Realtime-2338</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37">KJ-1 (Confidence: HIGH — Likely [WEP Level 3/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37">KJ-1 (Confidence: HIGH — Likely [WEP Level 3/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-confidence-high--likely-wep-level-37"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>The Social Democrats have launched a coordinated parliamentary accountability campaign targeting Finance Minister Svantesson as the primary vector for undermining the Tidö coalition's fiscal competence narrative ahead of Election 2026.</strong></p>
 <p><em>Basis</em>: 4 interpellations filed on 2026-04-22 by S MPs, 3 directly targeting Svantesson (HD10442 eating disorder court case, HD10444 employer contributions to social dumping, and one other); the cluster follows a pre-existing HD10442 filed 2026-04-21; the accountability emphasis on Svantesson's stewardship of tax-financed employer contributions aligns with S's positioning as the defender of the Swedish welfare model against labour market exploitation. Source authority: [A1] riksdagen.se API direct retrieval.</p>
 <p><em>Counter-indicator to watch</em>: If S files no further interpellations targeting coalition ministers in the 2026-04-23 to 2026-05-15 window, the campaign was a one-day tactical burst rather than a sustained strategy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47">KJ-2 (Confidence: MODERATE — Roughly even [WEP Level 4/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47">KJ-2 (Confidence: MODERATE — Roughly even [WEP Level 4/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-confidence-moderate--roughly-even-wep-level-47"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>The extra budget fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48, effective 2026-05-01) will deliver a visible but small consumer benefit that serves both an electoral signalling function and a legitimate emergency relief function; it is unlikely to produce decisive electoral movement but will feature prominently in the coalition's May 2026 campaign messaging.</strong></p>
 <p><em>Basis</em>: FiU48 adopted by Riksdag 2026-04-21 with S/V/MP voting against (per opposition motions HD024082, HD024092, HD024098). The 82 öre/litre cut is modest but politically legible. International comparator (Germany Tankrabatt 2022) shows such measures have short political shelf-lives but serve as credibility-building signals of government responsiveness. Confidence limited to MODERATE because consumer response is not yet observable [B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17">KJ-3 (Confidence: HIGH — Almost certain [WEP Level 1/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17">KJ-3 (Confidence: HIGH — Almost certain [WEP Level 1/7])<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-confidence-high--almost-certain-wep-level-17"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Sweden's legislative output for spring 2026 (propositions cluster: electricity system, wind power, environmental permitting, Ukraine tribunals, youth offenders, data interoperability) demonstrates an active pre-election legislative sprint by the Tidö coalition with a legacy-building objective.</strong></p>
 <p><em>Basis</em>: 8+ propositions submitted April 13–16, 2026 across Näringsdepartementet, Klimat- och näringsdepartementet, Utrikesdepartementet, Justitiedepartementet — covering cross-cutting domains. This density of legislative activity in the final legislative weeks before an autumn election is consistent with "legislative sprint" patterns identified in prior Swedish election cycles. Source: [A1] riksdagen.se API direct retrieval.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability">PIR-1 (STANDING): Government Stability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability">PIR-1 (STANDING): Government Stability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-1-standing-government-stability"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Will the Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L) maintain cohesion through the September 2026 election?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: STABLE with LOW-MODERATE attrition risk. The fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) passed with all four coalition parties supporting. No visible internal split on the accountancy interpellations. [B2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast">PIR-2 (STANDING): Election 2026 Forecast<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast">PIR-2 (STANDING): Election 2026 Forecast<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-2-standing-election-2026-forecast"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Which bloc will form government after September 2026?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: UNCERTAIN — polling remains within margin of error. S accountability offensive (HD10444 et al.) is the current best signal of whether S can narrow the gap. [B2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track">PIR-3 (ACTIVE): Svantesson Accountability Track<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track">PIR-3 (ACTIVE): Svantesson Accountability Track<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-3-active-svantesson-accountability-track"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Will the coordinated interpellation campaign produce a factual error by Svantesson that triggers a KU review petition?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: WATCH. Debate answers expected 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05. Gate indicator: KU petition filed by S within 14 days of debate. [B2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact">PIR-4 (ACTIVE): Fuel Tax Electoral Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact">PIR-4 (ACTIVE): Fuel Tax Electoral Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-4-active-fuel-tax-electoral-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Does the 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut move consumer sentiment / government approval?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: UNKNOWN. Observable from 2026-05-02 pump price data. [not yet rated]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory">PIR-5 (ACTIVE): Constitutional Amendment Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory">PIR-5 (ACTIVE): Constitutional Amendment Trajectory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-5-active-constitutional-amendment-trajectory"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: What are the HD01KU33/32 constitutional amendments about and do they affect electoral rules?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: FLAG for full-text review. Currently title-only assessment [B3].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position">PIR-6 (STANDING): Ukraine Diplomatic-Legal Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position">PIR-6 (STANDING): Ukraine Diplomatic-Legal Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-6-standing-ukraine-diplomatic-legal-position"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: How does Sweden's Ukraine tribunal package (HD03231/232) affect Sweden's position within EU diplomatic consensus?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: CONSISTENT — both propositions passed through normal procedures; no breakaway signals. [A2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable">PIR-7 (STANDING): Energy Security Legislative Timetable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable">PIR-7 (STANDING): Energy Security Legislative Timetable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-7-standing-energy-security-legislative-timetable"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: When will the electricity system, wind power, and environmental permitting propositions (HD03240/239/238) receive committee reports?
 <strong>Current assessment</strong>: Committee review phase (NäringsU, MiljöU) expected May–June 2026. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C)<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR inherited</th><th>Source folder</th><th>Resolution status</th><th>This-cycle update</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"What is the coalition's energy security legislative timetable before September 2026 election?"</td><td>propositions/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>HD03240/239/238 submitted — committee review next</td></tr><tr><td>"How will opposition parties exploit the fuel tax cut in the election campaign?"</td><td>motions/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>ACTIVE — escalating</td><td>HD10444 interpellation confirms S using fiscal accountability angle</td></tr><tr><td>"When will KU constitutional amendments (KU33/32) come to second reading post-election?"</td><td>committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>First reading done; must await September 2026 election + new Riksdag</td></tr><tr><td>"Is the S accountability strategy a one-day event or a sustained multi-week campaign?"</td><td>interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</td><td>NEWLY UPGRADED to ACTIVE</td><td>Today's 4 interpellations confirm campaign, not one-day event — watch 2026-04-28+</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-calibration-summary">Confidence Calibration Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-calibration-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-calibration-summary">Confidence Calibration Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-calibration-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-calibration-summary">Confidence Calibration Summary<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KJ</th><th>WEP Band</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1</td><td>Likely</td><td>A1</td><td>Direct API evidence for interpellation filing</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2</td><td>Roughly even</td><td>B2</td><td>Consumer response not yet observable</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3</td><td>Almost certain</td><td>A1</td><td>Direct API count of propositions submitted</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Methodology</strong>: ai-driven-analysis-guide.md, significance-scoring.md
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-framework">Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-framework">Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-framework"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>D</strong> (Depth/Impact): 1–10 scale on policy substance and magnitude</li>
 <li><strong>I</strong> (Intelligence Value): 1–10 scale on analytical/predictive utility</li>
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-framework">Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Tier</strong>: L1 Surface / L2 Strategic / L2+ Priority / L3 Intelligence-grade</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-1-ranked-significance-table">1. Ranked Significance Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-ranked-significance-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-ranked-significance-table">1. Ranked Significance Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-ranked-significance-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-ranked-significance-table">1. Ranked Significance Table<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th><strong>DIW</strong></th><th>Tier</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 — bränsle/el/gas (ENACTED)</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.7</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD10444</td><td>Arbetsgivaravgift abuse — Svantesson interpellation</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.0</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner — Slottner</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.3</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt — housing pre-emption rights</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Sverige + Ukraine skadeståndskommission</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Sverige + aggressionstribunalen för Ukraina</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.7</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar — Svantesson</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.0</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar vid husrannsakan (constitution, first reading)</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.7</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier (constitution, first reading)</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.3</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk — regulatory reform</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.0</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Datainteroperabilitet — public sector</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.7</strong></td><td>L1</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024090</td><td>Utvisning — V motion (full rejection)</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.7</strong></td><td>L1</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Drivmedel — MP motion (reject fuel cut)</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5.7</strong></td><td>L1</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2-sensitivity-analysis">2. Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-sensitivity-analysis">2. Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>High-sensitivity items (DIW ≥ 8.0 with electoral impact)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 [A1]: Enacted — fiscal relief narrative is now law. Electoral impact: S/V/MP LOSE this battle in 2026 pre-election. Government gains summer relief narrative.</li>
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-sensitivity-analysis">2. Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidde
 <li>HD10442 (eating disorder court case) present in interpellations sibling but NOT yet in today's new filings — it was filed 2026-04-21. Admiralty [A1-confirmed by sibling analysis] but excluded from today's new documents list.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-diw-rank-diagram">3. DIW Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-diw-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-diw-rank-diagram">3. DIW Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-diw-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title DIW Scores — Realtime Monitor 2026-04-22
     dateFormat X
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-diw-rank-diagram">3. DIW Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style HD01FiU48 fill:#e65100
     style HD10443 fill:#b71c1c</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay">4. Top Forward Triggers (Significance Decay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay">4. Top Forward Triggers (Significance Decay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -825,16 +825,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-top-forward-triggers-significance-decay">4. Top Forward Triggers (S
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Significance Decay Date</th><th>Trigger Event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Interpellation debate — Svantesson answer</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>2026-04-29</td><td>Interpellation debate — Slottner answer</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>2026-04-30</td><td>Interpellation debate — Carlson answer</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>2026-05-01</td><td>Fuel tax cut takes effect — petrol prices at pump</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>2026-06-01</td><td>El-system law enters parliamentary committee</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor">Expected Framing by Political Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-governmentcoalition-framing">Government/Coalition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-framing"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor">Expected Framing by Political Actor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-political-actor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-governmentcoalition-framing">Government/Coalition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Delivery-focused government protecting Swedish households" — HD01FiU48 fuel cut as headline, energy legislation as long-term security
 <strong>Supporting narrative</strong>: "S is engaging in pre-election theatre while we govern"
 <strong>Vulnerability</strong>: HD10444 employer contributions to social dumping — if Svantesson cannot provide factual rebuttal, "government enables wage exploitation" frame becomes credible
 <strong>Tone</strong>: "Responsible fiscal management, record delivery"
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Moderate sympathetic outlets (Expressen, SvD), governmental press conferences</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing">S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing">S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Coalition ministers fail to protect Swedish workers and vulnerable citizens"
 <strong>Sub-frames</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -845,19 +845,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-s-socialdemokraterna-framing">S (Socialdemokraterna) Framing<a class=
 <strong>Tone</strong>: Accountability, moral outrage (carefully calibrated to avoid "too strident")
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Aftonbladet, LO-Tidningen, S-aligned regional press</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: Unlikely to prominently cover S interpellations (different accountability axis). Will focus on fuel tax cut SUCCESS (populist energy nationalism) and youth crime reform (HD03246).
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Avpixlat-adjacent outlets, social media</p>
-<h3 id="rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing">MP (Miljöpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing">MP (Miljöpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-miljöpartiet-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Fuel tax cut is climate regression; coalition abandons Sweden's climate commitments"
 <strong>Sub-frame</strong>: Energy legislation (HD03239 vindkraft) as insufficient half-measure
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Miljömagasinet, urban progressive press</p>
-<h3 id="rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing">V (Vänsterpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing">V (Vänsterpartiet) Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-vänsterpartiet-framing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary frame</strong>: "Government cuts fuel tax instead of investing in public transport — wrong priorities for working class"
 <strong>Sub-frame</strong>: Social dumping (aligns with HD10443/HD10444) — V's traditional labour market accountability frame
 <strong>Expected media vehicles</strong>: Flamman, Proletären, social media</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets">Expected Mainstream Media Framing (Swedish Press Outlets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets">Expected Mainstream Media Framing (Swedish Press Outlets)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expected-mainstream-media-framing-swedish-press-outlets">Expected Mai
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>Expected Frame</th><th>Based on past coverage patterns</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Aftonbladet</td><td>Accountability-first: Svantesson interpellations lead</td><td>S-sympathetic tabloid; likely HD10444/10442 double spread [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Expressen</td><td>Balanced accountability with coalition defence</td><td>Centre-liberal; will examine both interpellations and coalition's fuel tax delivery [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Dagens Nyheter (DN)</td><td>Analysis: "Is this a turning point?"</td><td>Quality broadsheet; likely scenario analysis rather than pure accountability [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>SVT Nyheter</td><td>Public interest neutral: all 4 interpellations reported</td><td>Public broadcaster; procedural coverage of all parties [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>SvD</td><td>Business-framing: HD01FiU48 economic analysis</td><td>Conservative-leaning; will examine fiscal impact of fuel cut [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-risk-matrix">Framing Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-risk-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-risk-matrix">Framing Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-risk-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Media Framing Risk vs. Coalition Electoral Impact
     x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
@@ -911,10 +911,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-risk-matrix">Framing Risk Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     Energy legislation: [0.2, 0.4]
     HD03246 youth crime reform: [0.3, 0.5]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc">Lens 1: Government Coalition (Tidö Bloc)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc">Lens 1: Government Coalition (Tidö Bloc)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-coalition-tidö-bloc">Lens 1: Government Coalition
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Finance Minister</td><td>HIGH NEGATIVE</td><td>Defending three simultaneous interpellations; managing fiscal + accountability narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Infrastructure/Housing Minister</td><td>MEDIUM NEGATIVE</td><td>HD10445 forces public accounting on SOU 2024:38 non-implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Erik Slottner (KD)</td><td>Civilminister</td><td>MEDIUM NEGATIVE</td><td>HD10443 forces answer on municipal social dumping practices</td></tr><tr><td>Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Justice Minister</td><td>NEUTRAL-POSITIVE</td><td>HD03246 (youth offenders) strengthens his law-and-order record</td></tr><tr><td>Johan Britz (KD/L)</td><td>Climate &#x26; Energy Minister</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD03240 (electricity laws), HD03239 (wind power) are his core delivery</td></tr><tr><td>Lotta Edholm (L)</td><td>Acting PM (April)</td><td>NEUTRAL</td><td>Signed HD03240 — positioned as energy competence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-parties">Lens 2: Opposition Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-parties"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-parties">Lens 2: Opposition Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-parties"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-parties">Lens 2: Opposition Parties<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Magdalena Andersson (S)</td><td>Opposition Leader</td><td>POSITIVE</td><td>S accountability strategy generates election material</td></tr><tr><td>Jonathan Svensson (S)</td><td>MP, HD10444 author</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>Executing employer contribution investigation angle</td></tr><tr><td>Markus Kallifatides (S)</td><td>MP, HD10445/HD10442</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>Two-pronged housing + healthcare accountability attack</td></tr><tr><td>Peder Björk (S)</td><td>MP, HD10443 author</td><td>ACTIVE</td><td>Social welfare accountability angle</td></tr><tr><td>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</td><td>V leader</td><td>POSITIVE</td><td>V motion HD024092 positions V as climate-social alternative</td></tr><tr><td>Janine Alm Ericson (MP)</td><td>MP HD024098</td><td>POSITIVE</td><td>MP framing fuel cut as climate retreat</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups">Lens 3: Directly Affected Citizens/Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups">Lens 3: Directly Affected Citizens/Groups<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-directly-affected-citizensgroups">Lens 3: Directly Affected Ci
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Swedish motorists (~5 million)</td><td>POSITIVE (82 öre/L fuel cut from May 1)</td><td>[A1] HD01FiU48 enacted</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm suburban residents (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved)</td><td>NEGATIVE (pre-emption rights not advanced)</td><td>[B2] HD10445</td></tr><tr><td>Young workers (employer contribution reduction beneficiaries)</td><td>NEGATIVE if exploitation confirmed</td><td>[B2] HD10444</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal welfare recipients (social dumping victims)</td><td>NEGATIVE (transferral without consent documented)</td><td>[B2] HD10443</td></tr><tr><td>~30 citizens/year wrongly declared dead</td><td>NEGATIVE (Skatteverket failure ongoing)</td><td>[A2] HD10446</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-institutional-actors">Lens 4: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-institutional-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-institutional-actors">Lens 4: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-institutional-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-institutional-actors">Lens 4: Institutional Actors<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Institution</th><th>Position</th><th>Stakes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Skatteverket</td><td>Under scrutiny</td><td>HD10446 false death declarations (~30/year admitted by Svantesson)</td></tr><tr><td>Kommunförbundet (SKR)</td><td>Watching closely</td><td>HD10443 social dumping creates inter-municipal tension</td></tr><tr><td>Riksrevisionen</td><td>Active</td><td>HD01MJU21 (agriculture climate audit) ongoing; HD01CU42 (dödsbon) laid to table</td></tr><tr><td>JO (Justitieombudsman)</td><td>Potential</td><td>Social dumping (HD10443) could attract JO complaint if interpellation reveals systematic violations</td></tr><tr><td>Lantmäteriet</td><td>Active</td><td>HD01CU27 (identity at land registration) strengthens registration controls</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector">Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector">Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-businessemployer-sector">Lens 5: Business/Employer Sector<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sector</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Swedish retailers (named in Aftonbladet investigation)</td><td>NEGATIVE (HD10444 accountability pressure)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy sector (electricity producers)</td><td>POSITIVE (HD03240 new framework)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power developers</td><td>POSITIVE/MIXED (HD03239 revenue sharing mandates)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry/Timber sector</td><td>POSITIVE (HD03242 clearer active forestry rules)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Arms manufacturers</td><td>MONITORING (HD024091/096 motions; policy not changed)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context">Lens 6: International/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context">Lens 6: International/EU Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-internationaleu-context">Lens 6: International/EU Context<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Ukraine government</td><td>POSITIVE (HD03231 + HD03232 Sweden joins tribunals/commission)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>MONITORING (fuel tax cut at EU minimum floor; HD01FiU48)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>NATO partners</td><td>NEUTRAL-POSITIVE (Ukraine solidarity strengthens security partnership)</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network-map">Influence Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network-map">Influence Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     S_PARTY["🔴 S Opposition&#x3C;br/>Coordinated 4 interpellations"] --> SVANTESSON["Elisabeth Svantesson (M)&#x3C;br/>Finance Minister"]
     S_PARTY --> SLOTTNER["Erik Slottner (KD)&#x3C;br/>Civilminister"]
@@ -1175,87 +1175,87 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network-map">Influence Network Map<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style HD01FiU48 fill:#e65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style HD03246 fill:#1565c0,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>≥10 dated indicators across 4 time horizons (Near, Short, Medium, Long)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06">Horizon 1: Near-Term (0–14 days: 2026-04-22 to 2026-05-06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers">FI-1: Svantesson interpellation debate answers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06">Horizon 1: Near-Term (0–14 days: 2026-04-22 to 2026-05-06)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-near-term-014-days-2026-04-22-to-2026-05-06"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers">FI-1: Svantesson interpellation debate answers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-1-svantesson-interpellation-debate-answers"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Did Svantesson provide factual, specific answers to HD10444 (employer contributions) and HD10442 (eating disorder court case)?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Detailed factual answer with Finansinspektionen/Tillväxtverket data → narrative containment
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: Vague or deflective answer → S picks up 2-4 points in next poll, KU petition likely
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se anföranden, SVT Nyheter coverage</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate">FI-2: HD10446 false death declaration debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate">FI-2: HD10446 false death declaration debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-2-hd10446-false-death-declaration-debate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Carlson (KD) provides government's account of Skatteverket/Socialstyrelsen coordination on false death records
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Documented remediation of process → issue closed
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: No systemic fix documented → JO complaint risk [B2]
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se anföranden</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility">FI-3: HD01FiU48 pump price visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility">FI-3: HD01FiU48 pump price visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-3-hd01fiu48-pump-price-visibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-02 to 2026-05-05
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Do major Swedish fuel retailers (Preem, Circle K, OKQ8) publish pump price reduction reflecting 82 öre tax cut?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Visible pump price drop → government can claim HD01FiU48 impact
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: No visible drop → opposition "fake relief" narrative activated
 <strong>Source</strong>: Fuel retailer price data (public websites)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle">FI-4: New S/V/MP interpellations after HD10444 cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle">FI-4: New S/V/MP interpellations after HD10444 cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-4-new-svmp-interpellations-after-hd10444-cycle"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-04-23 to 2026-05-06
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: How many further accountability interpellations filed by S between now and May 6?
 <strong>Green signal (for coalition)</strong>: 0–1 further interpellations → one-day tactical burst
 <strong>Red signal (for coalition)</strong>: ≥3 further interpellations → sustained campaign confirmed
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se search_dokument(doktyp=ip, rm=2025/26)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03">Horizon 2: Short-Term (2–6 weeks: 2026-05-06 to 2026-06-03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238">FI-5: Energy legislation committee reports (HD03240/239/238)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03">Horizon 2: Short-Term (2–6 weeks: 2026-05-06 to 2026-06-03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-26-weeks-2026-05-06-to-2026-06-03"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238">FI-5: Energy legislation committee reports (HD03240/239/238)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-5-energy-legislation-committee-reports-hd03240239238"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-15 to 2026-06-15
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Do NäringsU and MiljöU publish positive committee reports enabling Riksdag votes before summer recess?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: All three approved → coalition pre-election legacy narrative
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: One or more deferred to autumn → "unfinished business" opposition attack
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=NU,MJU)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report">FI-6: Youth offender reform (HD03246) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report">FI-6: Youth offender reform (HD03246) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-6-youth-offender-reform-hd03246-committee-report"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-30 to 2026-06-10
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does JuU publish committee report on unga lagöverträdare reform?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Approved with broad support → bipartisan crime policy achievement
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: S/V/MP dissents → crime policy dividing line in election campaign
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=JuU)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle">FI-7: Polling movement post-interpellation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle">FI-7: Polling movement post-interpellation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-7-polling-movement-post-interpellation-cycle"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-10 to 2026-05-20
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Do Novus/Ipsos/SIFO polls show S moving above 30% following interpellation cycle?
 <strong>Green signal (for S)</strong>: S polling >30% → accountability campaign gaining electoral traction
 <strong>Green signal (for coalition)</strong>: M+SD+KD+L hold ≥176 projected seats → Tidö continuation
 <strong>Source</strong>: Published poll aggregates (Novus, Ipsos, SIFO)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01">Horizon 3: Medium-Term (6 weeks–3 months: 2026-06-03 to 2026-09-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal">FI-8: C (Centerpartiet) coalition signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01">Horizon 3: Medium-Term (6 weeks–3 months: 2026-06-03 to 2026-09-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-medium-term-6-weeks3-months-2026-06-03-to-2026-09-01"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal">FI-8: C (Centerpartiet) coalition signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-8-c-centerpartiet-coalition-signal"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-06-15 to 2026-08-01
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does C party leader (Muharrem Demirok) state a preference for post-election coalition direction?
 <strong>Green signal (for Tidö)</strong>: C signals it will prioritise governing with M over S bloc
 <strong>Green signal (for S bloc)</strong>: C signals openness to S-led government
 <strong>Source</strong>: Press interviews, SVT/SR Almedalen declarations (Almedalen late June)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll">FI-9: L (Liberalerna) threshold poll<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll">FI-9: L (Liberalerna) threshold poll<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-9-l-liberalerna-threshold-poll"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-06-01 to 2026-09-13
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does L consistently poll above 4% in ≥3 successive polls?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: L above 4% → Tidö coalition arithmetic stable
 <strong>Red signal</strong>: L polling below 4% in ≥2 polls → threshold risk scenario activated
 <strong>Source</strong>: Published poll aggregates</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report">FI-10: Ukraine tribunal legislation (HD03231/232) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report">FI-10: Ukraine tribunal legislation (HD03231/232) committee report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-10-ukraine-tribunal-legislation-hd03231232-committee-report"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-05-20 to 2026-06-15
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does UtU publish report approving Ukraine tribunal framework propositions?
 <strong>Green signal</strong>: Approved → Sweden's Ukraine transitional justice role confirmed
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se get_betankanden(organ=UU)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward">Horizon 4: Long-Term (3+ months: 2026-09-01 onward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition">FI-11: Election 2026 result — Riksdag composition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward">Horizon 4: Long-Term (3+ months: 2026-09-01 onward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-long-term-3-months-2026-09-01-onward"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition">FI-11: Election 2026 result — Riksdag composition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-11-election-2026-result--riksdag-composition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-09-13
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Which bloc achieves majority (175 seats)?
 <strong>Source</strong>: Swedish Election Authority (Valmyndigheten)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading">FI-12: HD01KU33/32 constitutional second reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading">FI-12: HD01KU33/32 constitutional second reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fi-12-hd01ku3332-constitutional-second-reading"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Watch date</strong>: 2026-10-01 to 2027-03-01
 <strong>Indicator</strong>: Does the newly constituted Riksdag (post-election) advance KU33/32 to second reading and approval?
 <strong>Source</strong>: riksdagen.se post-election session documents</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-indicator-dashboard">Forward Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicator-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-indicator-dashboard">Forward Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicator-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
     dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
@@ -1276,12 +1276,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-indicator-dashboard">Forward Indicator Dashboard<a class="" a
         FI-11 Election Day                :milestone, 2026-09-13, 1d
         FI-12 KU constitutional 2nd read  :2026-10-01, 2027-03-01</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Three scenarios for the political trajectory of the S accountability offensive and its impact on Election 2026, based on the interpellation cluster filed 2026-04-22.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25">Scenario 1: "Accountability Breakthrough" (Probability: 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25">Scenario 1: "Accountability Breakthrough" (Probability: 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson provides a factually challenged or evasive answer to one or more of the three interpellations targeting her (HD10444 employer contributions, HD10442 eating disorder court case, HD10446 false death declarations). Media coverage escalates to a sustained news cycle over 10+ days. KU constitutional review petition filed by S group.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-1-accountability-breakthrough-probability-25">Scenario 1: "A
 <p><strong>Election impact</strong>: HIGH negative for M/coalition. Fiscal competence narrative damaged. S gains 1–3 percentage points in polls (within polling error but directionally significant).</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade</strong>: Coalition considers emergency response (press conference, Riksdag statement); possible M party executive communication strategy revision.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55">Scenario 2: "Narrative Containment" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55">Scenario 2: "Narrative Containment" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson delivers measured, factually defended answers to all three interpellations. Media coverage is routine (one news cycle, 3–5 days). The coalition successfully pivots to the fuel tax relief implementation (2026-05-01) and energy legislation agenda (HD03240, HD03239). The S accountability offensive scores tactical points but does not produce a sustained narrative advantage.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-2-narrative-containment-probability-55">Scenario 2: "Narrati
 <p><strong>Election impact</strong>: NEUTRAL. Status quo maintained. Both S and coalition activate base supporters but neither gains net new voters from interpellation cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade</strong>: S shifts to next accountability target (possibly housing segregation HD10445, or education/healthcare domains).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20">Scenario 3: "Opposition Fragmentation" (Probability: 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20">Scenario 3: "Opposition Fragmentation" (Probability: 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The S accountability offensive backfires. The government points to enacted legislation (HD01FiU48 fuel relief, HD03246 youth crime, HD03244 data interoperability) as proof of delivery. Media frames the interpellations as pre-election theatre. Centerpartiet (C) explicitly distances itself from S on deportation (HD024095 amending rather than rejecting prop. 2025/26:235) — fracturing the "alternative bloc" narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1314,12 +1314,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-3-opposition-fragmentation-probability-20">Scenario 3: "Oppo
 <p><strong>Election impact</strong>: POSITIVE for coalition. S bloc cohesion weakened. C positioned as responsible alternative, potentially in coalition talks regardless of who wins.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascade</strong>: S internal pressure to find stronger accountability angle; possible leadership communication tension within S parliamentary group.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario Probability Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Scenario Probabilities — Realtime 2026-04-22
     "Scenario 1: Accountability Breakthrough" : 25
     "Scenario 2: Narrative Containment" : 55
     "Scenario 3: Opposition Fragmentation" : 20</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-leading-indicator-matrix">Leading Indicator Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicator-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-leading-indicator-matrix">Leading Indicator Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicator-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1369,10 +1369,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-leading-indicator-matrix">Leading Indicator Matrix<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Scenario 1</th><th>Scenario 2</th><th>Scenario 3</th><th>Watch date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svantesson interpellation answer quality</td><td>Weak/evasive</td><td>Measured</td><td>Strong + deflects</td><td>2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet follow-up on HD10444</td><td>Published + names retailers</td><td>No follow-up</td><td>Aftonbladet retracts/corrects</td><td>2026-04-25–05-05</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel prices at pump post-May 1</td><td>No visible drop</td><td>Moderate drop</td><td>Significant drop, consumer praise</td><td>2026-05-02</td></tr><tr><td>C party statement on HD024095</td><td>Aligns with S</td><td>Silent</td><td>Praises government approach</td><td>2026-04-25</td></tr><tr><td>Media framing (SVT/DN/Aftonbladet)</td><td>"Crisis" framing</td><td>"Politics as usual"</td><td>"S overreach" framing</td><td>Daily from 2026-04-28</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items">Risk Register (5 Dimensions × 5 Items)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-definitions">Dimension Definitions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-definitions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items">Risk Register (5 Dimensions × 5 Items)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-5-dimensions--5-items"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-definitions">Dimension Definitions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-definitions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>L</strong>: Likelihood (1–5)</li>
 <li><strong>I</strong>: Impact (1–5)</li>
@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-definitions">Dimension Definitions<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Score</strong>: L × I (adjusted for T, R)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442">Risk 1 — Interpellation Debate Escalation to Ministerial Crisis [HD10444/HD10442]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442">Risk 1 — Interpellation Debate Escalation to Ministerial Crisis [HD10444/HD10442]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd10444hd10442"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: If Finance Minister Svantesson delivers a weak or factually challenged answer to HD10444 (employer contributions) or HD10442 (eating disorders court case) during the parliamentary debate (expected 2026-04-28–05-05), the accountability story will compound. Given the court vindication of Region Stockholm in HD10442 and documented Aftonbladet evidence for HD10444, the evidentiary burden on Svantesson is high.</p>
 
 
@@ -1408,7 +1408,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-1--interpellation-debate-escalation-to-ministerial-crisis-hd1044
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor debate scheduling; prepare analytical brief on each interpellation text vs. prior ministerial statements.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading risk</strong>: Parliamentary demand for Riksdag Konstitutionsutskott review of ministerial statements → constitutional accountability track (possible post-election).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48">Risk 2 — Fuel Tax Cut Backfire: Climate Credibility Collapse [HD01FiU48]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48">Risk 2 — Fuel Tax Cut Backfire: Climate Credibility Collapse [HD01FiU48]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The enacted 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48) reduces Sweden's energy tax to EU minimum floor. If spring/summer fuel consumption increases significantly and emissions data shows uptick, the opposition will have a documented case that the government prioritised electoral cost relief over climate commitments. Particularly damaging if COP or EU review coincides.</p>
 
 
@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-2--fuel-tax-cut-backfire-climate-credibility-collapse-hd01fiu48"
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Track fuel consumption data from Trafikverket and SCB fuel statistics post-1 May 2026.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443">Risk 3 — Social Dumping Litigation / Human Rights Escalation [HD10443]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443">Risk 3 — Social Dumping Litigation / Human Rights Escalation [HD10443]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Interpellation HD10443 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443) documents systematic municipal social dumping — transferring vulnerable residents between municipalities without consent. If civil society organizations or the Justitieombudsman (JO) initiate formal complaints, the government faces a dual legislative-judicial track crisis.</p>
 
 
@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-3--social-dumping-litigation--human-rights-escalation-hd10443">R
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor JO diariet for new incoming complaints on kommunal social dumping; check SOU 2025 docket for related investigations.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445">Risk 4 — Stockholm Housing Segregation Escalation [HD10445]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445">Risk 4 — Stockholm Housing Segregation Escalation [HD10445]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Failure to advance SOU 2024:38 recommendations on municipal pre-emption rights for key suburban properties (HD10445, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10445) creates a structural risk: if a private equity or speculative investor acquires one of the named centre properties (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) before the election, the political fallout for the government's urban policy will be acute.</p>
 
 
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-4--stockholm-housing-segregation-escalation-hd10445">Risk 4 —
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor property transaction records via Lantmäteriet for named suburban centres; track SOU 2024:38 implementation status.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240">Risk 5 — Energy Law Delay: Electricity System Legislation [HD03240]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240">Risk 5 — Energy Law Delay: Electricity System Legislation [HD03240]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The new electricity system laws (HD03240, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240, submitted 2026-04-14 by Climate and Business Dept.) are scheduled for committee review. If the legislative timeline slips past the September 2026 election, the successor government (of any composition) will inherit an unresolved electricity system framework — creating regulatory uncertainty for grid investments.</p>
 
 
@@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-5--energy-law-delay-electricity-system-legislation-hd03240">Risk
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>T</th><th>R</th><th>Score</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: Monitor NMU/KNU committee scheduling for HD03240 after submission.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     A["HD10444 Employer contribution abuse"] --> B["Interpellation debate 2026-04-28+"]
     B --> C{"Svantesson answer quality?"}
@@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style I fill:#f57f17,color:#000000
     style J fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF
     style E fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h3>
 <p>| Risk | P(Trigger Event) | P(Escalation|Trigger) | P(Full escalation) |
 |------|-----------------|----------------------|-------------------|
 | R1: Ministerial debate escalation | 0.40 | 0.45 | <strong>0.18</strong> |
@@ -1543,15 +1543,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a cl
 | R4: Stockholm housing incident | 0.20 | 0.40 | <strong>0.08</strong> |
 | R5: Energy law delay | 0.30 | 0.35 | <strong>0.11</strong> |</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Framework</strong>: political-swot-framework.md
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Cycle</strong>: Realtime-2338 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-22</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h3>
 <p>This SWOT analyses the <strong>political position of the Kristersson coalition government</strong> as revealed by the 2026-04-22 realtime parliamentary intelligence picture — specifically assessing governmental strengths, weaknesses, opposition opportunities, and external threats visible in today's documents.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1">S1 — Budget Enacted: Fiscal Relief Narrative Active [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1">S1 — Budget Enacted: Fiscal Relief Narrative Active [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The extra supplementary budget (HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48) passed on 2026-04-21 despite cross-party opposition from S, V and MP. The government now holds a concrete "we cut your fuel costs" narrative deliverable for the summer campaign: 82 öre/litre petrol cut from 1 May 2026. The cross-party majority (M+SD+KD+L+C) demonstrates the Tidö coalition's legislative operability even in contentious fiscal territory.</p>
 
 
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-s1--budget-enacted-fiscal-relief-narrative-active-a1">S1 — Budget E
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48 enacted 2026-04-21; 82 öre/L cut; 4.1 GSEK fiscal impact</td><td>[A1]</td><td>9</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1">S2 — Legislative Sprint Delivering on Agenda [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1">S2 — Legislative Sprint Delivering on Agenda [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Five major propositions submitted April 14–16 (HD03240 electricity, HD03242 forestry, HD03246 youth offenders, HD03232/231 Ukraine tribunals) demonstrate legislative productivity. This counters opposition narratives of a "do-nothing government" ahead of the election. Each proposition touches a key constituency: rural (forestry), security (crime), energy (electricity/housing), international (Ukraine).</p>
 
 
@@ -1588,8 +1588,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-s2--legislative-sprint-delivering-on-agenda-a1">S2 — Legislative Sp
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03240 (data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240), HD03242, HD03246, HD03231, HD03232 submitted Apr 14–16</td><td>[A1]</td><td>7</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2">W1 — Finance Minister Svantesson: Three Simultaneous Accountability Vectors [A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2">W1 — Finance Minister Svantesson: Three Simultaneous Accountability Vectors [A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vectors-a2"></a></h4>
 <p>On 2026-04-22 alone, the S opposition filed three separate interpellations targeting Finance Minister Svantesson (HD10444 employer contributions, HD10446 false deaths, HD10442 eating disorder court case). Each targets a documented past ministerial statement that is either contested or contradicted by subsequent events. The concentration of fire on a single minister signals S has research files ready for a coordinated debate campaign.</p>
 
 
@@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-w1--finance-minister-svantesson-three-simultaneous-accountability-vec
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444), HD10446 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10446) filed 2026-04-22; HD10442 filed 2026-04-21</td><td>[A2]</td><td>9</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2">W2 — Employer Contribution Exploitation Scandal [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2">W2 — Employer Contribution Exploitation Scandal [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>The HD10444 interpellation cites an Aftonbladet investigation showing major retailers diverted the youth employment tax relief (10.9% reduction from April 2026) into profit margins rather than new jobs. Riksdagen's own legislative intent was youth job creation. If confirmed, this undermines the flagship labour market reform narrative.</p>
 
 
@@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-w2--employer-contribution-exploitation-scandal-b2">W2 — Employer Co
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444 text citing Aftonbladet investigation (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444); employer contribution reduction enacted April 2026</td><td>[B2]</td><td>8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2">W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2">W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellation HD10443 (Peder Björk/S → Civilminister Slottner/KD) documents that vulnerable persons — social welfare recipients, asylum seekers — are being transferred between municipalities without consent, violating their right to self-determination and established residence. This represents a structural failure in the government's social welfare coordination model.</p>
 
 
@@ -1644,23 +1644,23 @@ <h3 id="rm-w3--social-dumping-unaddressed-b2">W3 — Social Dumping Unaddressed
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10443 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443); municipalities: informal transfer practices documented</td><td>[B2]</td><td>8</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1">O1 — Energy Security Narrative Ownership [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1">O1 — Energy Security Narrative Ownership [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o1--energy-security-narrative-ownership-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The combined passage of HD01FiU48 (fuel cut) and submission of HD03240 (new electricity system laws) and HD03239 (wind power revenue sharing) gives the government a coherent "energy security + household relief" narrative going into the election. If electricity prices remain elevated through summer 2026, the government's proactive measures will be politically valuable. Source: HD01FiU48 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1">O2 — Ukraine Solidarity Positioning [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1">O2 — Ukraine Solidarity Positioning [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o2--ukraine-solidarity-positioning-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The dual Ukraine propositions (HD03231 aggression tribunal + HD03232 damage commission; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231, riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232) position Sweden in the front rank of European Ukraine support. Given Sweden's new NATO membership context, this carries strong cross-party consensus value and foreign policy credibility heading into the election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1">O3 — Law and Order Narrative: Youth Offenders [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1">O3 — Law and Order Narrative: Youth Offenders [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o3--law-and-order-narrative-youth-offenders-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>HD03246 (Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare, Gunnar Strömmer, Justitiedept.; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03246) strengthens the government's law-and-order credentials. Youth crime is a high-salience electoral topic where the Tidö bloc has historically polled strongly, particularly among SD voters.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2">T1 — Coordinated S Accountability Offensive Could Dominate News Cycle [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2">T1 — Coordinated S Accountability Offensive Could Dominate News Cycle [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t1--coordinated-s-accountability-offensive-could-dominate-news-cycle-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>The four interpellations filed today (HD10444, HD10443, HD10445, HD10446) are structured to generate debate material over the next 7–10 days. If any ministerial answer is factually challenged or contradicted by subsequent evidence, the accountability story will compound. The eating disorder court case (HD10442, where Region Stockholm won 67 MSEK and vindicated its earlier statements) is the pre-existing live risk. Source: interpellations sibling analysis for HD10442.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2">T2 — Fuel Tax Cut: Climate Policy Credibility Damage [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2">T2 — Fuel Tax Cut: Climate Policy Credibility Damage [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t2--fuel-tax-cut-climate-policy-credibility-damage-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>The 82 öre/litre fuel tax cut (HD01FiU48) aligns Sweden with EU minimum levels but is widely framed as a retreat from climate commitments. Opposition motions from MP (HD024098) and V (HD024092) have created a documented record that the government prioritised cost relief over emissions reduction. Ahead of the 2026 election, this may reduce support among climate-sensitive voters (green-conservative segment that traditionally splits between M, C, L, and MP). Source: HD024098, HD024092 (riksdagen.se).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2">T3 — Housing Segregation Backlash in Stockholm [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2">T3 — Housing Segregation Backlash in Stockholm [B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t3--housing-segregation-backlash-in-stockholm-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>Interpellation HD10445 (Markus Kallifatides/S → Andreas Carlson/KD) documents the government's failure to act on SOU 2024:38 recommendations for municipal pre-emption rights over key suburban properties. The affected suburbs (Sätra, Vårberg, Rågsved) are densely populated Stockholm districts with high immigrant-background populations — this story has the potential to intersect housing policy, segregation, and social cohesion debates in a city where swing voters matter for election outcomes. Source: HD10445 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10445).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths</th><th>Weaknesses</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Energy narrative (S2+O1) — leverage legislative productivity + relief measures as pre-election fiscal competence proof</td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Redirect accountability to reform (W1+O3) — use HD03246 law-and-order delivery to shift debate away from Svantesson accountability</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Lead with Ukraine solidarity (S2+T1) — keep foreign policy and security narrative active to counter domestic accountability media cycle</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: Climate credibility repair (W1+T2) — acknowledge climate trade-off in HD01FiU48 explicitly; commit to compensating measure before election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant cross-SWOT pattern is <strong>W1/T1 convergence</strong>: the S accountability offensive (W1) directly fuels the media-dominance threat (T1). The single most important risk management action for the coalition is <strong>preparing airtight answers</strong> to the HD10444 employer contribution question and the HD10442 eating disorder case before the interpellation debates scheduled 2026-04-28–05-05.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT Strategic Position — Kristersson Government 2026-04-22
@@ -1705,9 +1705,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
     style Energy fill:#2e7d32,color:#fff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt">Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt">Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1763,34 +1763,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-ptt">Political Threat Taxonomy (PTT)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat Code</th><th>Category</th><th>Active</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PTT-1</td><td>Ministerial Accountability (Interpellation-based)</td><td>YES</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-2</td><td>Legislative Agenda Disruption</td><td>MODERATE</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-3</td><td>Media Cycle Dominance (Opposition)</td><td>YES</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-4</td><td>Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack</td><td>YES</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-5</td><td>Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge</td><td>YES</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-6</td><td>Coalition Stability Threat</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>PTT-7</td><td>International/Diplomatic Risk</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-active-threat-profiles">Active Threat Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threat-profiles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive">PTT-1: Ministerial Accountability Offensive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-active-threat-profiles">Active Threat Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-threat-profiles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive">PTT-1: Ministerial Accountability Offensive<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-1-ministerial-accountability-offensive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: Socialdemokraterna (S)
 <strong>Target</strong>: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M); Civilminister Erik Slottner (KD); Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Simultaneous interpellations (HD10444, HD10443, HD10445, HD10446) filed 2026-04-22; pre-existing HD10442 from 2026-04-21
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Force ministerial debate answers that can be exploited for election campaign material
 <strong>Capability</strong>: [A2] — S parliamentary group has documented research capacity; prior interpellation pattern confirms coordinated approach
 <strong>Timing</strong>: Activation window 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-10 (parliamentary debate scheduling)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance">PTT-3: Media Cycle Dominance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance">PTT-3: Media Cycle Dominance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-3-media-cycle-dominance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: S + sympathetic media (based on Aftonbladet reporting referenced in HD10444)
 <strong>Target</strong>: Government economic management narrative
 <strong>Method</strong>: Interpellation debates + concurrent Aftonbladet investigation provide a dual parliamentary-journalism combination
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Establish "government serves corporations, not workers" counter-narrative to pre-election budget relief
 <strong>Capability</strong>: [B2] — confirmed Aftonbladet investigation exists per HD10444 text; media cycle risk is high given political salience of employer contributions</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack">PTT-4: Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack">PTT-4: Fiscal Policy Credibility Attack<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-4-fiscal-policy-credibility-attack"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: S, MP, V
 <strong>Target</strong>: Svantesson; Kristersson government's fiscal management
 <strong>Method</strong>: Three interpellations + opposition motions on prop. 2025/26:236 (HD024098, HD024092)
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Create narrative that government fiscal policy benefits corporations and top earners, not working families
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10444 (riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444); HD024098, HD024092 (riksdagen.se)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge">PTT-5: Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge">PTT-5: Social Policy Legitimacy Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ptt-5-social-policy-legitimacy-challenge"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Actor</strong>: S
 <strong>Target</strong>: Civilminister Slottner (KD) + municipal welfare system
 <strong>Method</strong>: HD10443 social dumping interpellation; HD10445 housing segregation interpellation
 <strong>Goal</strong>: Frame government as failing to protect Sweden's welfare state guarantees
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10443, HD10445 (riksdagen.se)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     ROOT["☠️ THREAT ROOT&#x3C;br/>S Pre-Election Accountability Campaign&#x3C;br/>2026-04-22 Launch [A2]"] --> AT1
     ROOT --> AT2
@@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     style Y1 fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF
     style L1C fill:#2e7d32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability">Kill Chain (Parliamentary Accountability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability">Kill Chain (Parliamentary Accountability)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-parliamentary-accountability">Kill Chain (Parliamentary Ac
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Action</th><th>Signal</th><th>Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>S research on minister's past statements</td><td>Published interpellation texts</td><td>Monitor interpellation content</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Aftonbladet/court evidence compiled</td><td>HD10442, HD10444 text cites evidence</td><td>Verify evidence strength</td></tr><tr><td>Deployment</td><td>Interpellations filed 2026-04-22</td><td>4 interpellations in one day</td><td>Escalation indicator</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>Parliamentary debate answers</td><td>Scheduled 2026-04-28–05-05</td><td>Maximum monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>Persistence</td><td>Media coverage + KU petition</td><td>Post-debate coverage</td><td>Track narrative trajectory</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Parliamentary Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Parliamentary Tactics)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1909,18 +1909,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-parliamentary-tactics">MITRE-Style TTP Mappin
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP-Code</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Procedure</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T001</td><td>Accountability</td><td>Multi-interpellation cluster</td><td>File 3+ interpellations targeting one minister</td></tr><tr><td>T002</td><td>Evidence anchoring</td><td>Court/media corroboration</td><td>Cite court decisions + investigative reporting in interpellation text</td></tr><tr><td>T003</td><td>Minister targeting</td><td>Single-target overload</td><td>Force 3+ debate answers from one minister within 2 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>T004</td><td>Temporal compression</td><td>Legislative session timing</td><td>File before summer recess to force answers before campaign starts</td></tr><tr><td>T005</td><td>Cross-domain synchronisation</td><td>Housing+fiscal+welfare</td><td>Attack multiple policy domains simultaneously to prevent single-issue containment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report) | <strong>Adopted</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Finansutskottets betänkande 2025/26:FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget (Vår 2026)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 <strong>Status</strong>: ENACTED — voted and approved by Riksdag 2026-04-21
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: 2026-05-01 (fuel tax relief component)
 <strong>Fiscal impact</strong>: 4.1 billion SEK (estimated full-year cost of fuel tax reduction)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-core-content">Core Content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-core-content"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-core-content">Core Content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-core-content"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary measure</strong>: 82 öre/litre reduction in fuel excise duty (drivmedelsskatt) effective 1 May 2026. Tax rate kept at EU minimum floor. Duration: May–September 2026 (temporary, aligned with summer driving season).</p>
 <p><strong>Secondary measures</strong> (based on committee report framing):</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-core-content">Core Content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <li>Ukraine support allocation [B2]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🔴 CRITICAL | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: Highest</p>
 <p>This is the most directly consequential enacted legislation in today's cycle. Effects are immediate (May 1, 2026) and tangible (consumers, businesses, opposition critique). The vote on 2026-04-21 confirmed coalition cohesion — M+SD+KD+L all supported; S+V+MP voted against (confirmed by opposition motions HD024098/HD024092/HD024082 in motions analysis).</p>
 <p><strong>Opposition critique</strong> (from motion filings HD024082/092/098):</p>
@@ -1941,14 +1941,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Government framing</strong>: "Protecting household purchasing power during energy cost crisis; staying at EU minimum to maintain credibility of Sweden's energy market position"</p>
 <p><strong>International context</strong>: Germany Tankrabatt 2022 (35 cents/litre, 3 months) as most direct precedent — see comparative-international.md.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval — betänkande confirmed adopted</li>
 <li>Fiscal figure (4.1 GSEK): [A2] — cited in committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md sibling analysis; assumed confirmed</li>
 <li>Vote outcome (opposition voted against): [A2] — inferred from sibling motions analysis + interpellation context</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Pump price data: 2026-05-01+ (FI-3 forward indicator)</li>
 <li>Opposition communication: S campaign messaging expected immediately post-May 1</li>
@@ -1956,47 +1956,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li>KU review petition: If employer contribution mechanism in FiU48 is linked to HD10444 allegations, KU review is theoretically possible [B3 — speculative]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10443">HD10443<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10443 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Reconciliation/Housing/Social Dumping Minister regarding inter-municipal transfer of welfare-dependent residents
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Erik Slottner (KD), Minister for Civil Affairs and Housing
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: High</p>
 <p>Inter-municipal social welfare dumping (kommuner "recommending" welfare recipients to move to cheaper municipalities) is a well-documented governance gap in Sweden's decentralised welfare model. HD10443 raises a systemic failure that no existing national law directly prohibits — municipalities operate under kommunalt självstyre (local self-governance) principle that creates an enforcement gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Why KD/Slottner is targeted</strong>: Slottner is responsible for housing and civil affairs. The interpellation likely focuses on his failure to introduce legislation preventing municipalities from managing welfare costs by informal relocation pressure. KD traditionally emphasises family values and welfare state coherence — being targetted on welfare dumping creates a party-brand dissonance.</p>
 <p><strong>International parallel</strong>: Dutch court ruling 2023, Danish social housing policy — both show this is a real policy problem across Nordic/European welfare states (comparative-international.md).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-1">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-1">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval of interpellation filing</li>
 <li>Content: [B2] Policy substance inferred from title + governance context</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Pattern recognition from sibling analysis (interpellations/synthesis-summary.md)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-1">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-1">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Slottner's debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</li>
 <li>Potential follow-up: JO complaint from affected municipalities or welfare recipients</li>
 <li>Legislative response: HD10443 raises a genuine governance gap — may appear as government proposal in autumn session</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10444">HD10444<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10444 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) regarding employer contributions paid to employers engaged in social dumping
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP (interpellation author — name to be confirmed in debate)
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Elisabeth Svantesson (Moderaterna), Minister for Finance
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🔴 CRITICAL | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: High</p>
 <p>The interpellation directly challenges the coherence of the government's fiscal management. The core allegation is that Swedish state employer contributions (arbetsgivaravgifter) have been paid to employers who engage in social dumping — i.e., exploiting foreign workers at below-market wages while receiving state-funded payroll subsidies.</p>
 <p>This framing is politically devastating for Svantesson because:</p>
@@ -2007,75 +2007,75 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidd
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Link to HD10443</strong>: HD10443 (Slottner interpellation on inter-municipal social dumping) and HD10444 (Svantesson on employer contributions) are thematically related — both use "social dumping" as the accountability frame on the same day [A1].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-2">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-2">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval of interpellation filing</li>
 <li>Content: [B2] Substantive claims in interpellation text not yet verified (text not retrieved in this run)</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Based on political framing inference from title + context</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-2">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-2">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05 (riksdagen.se anföranden)</li>
 <li>KU petition risk: LOW unless Svantesson's answer reveals factual errors in prior statements</li>
 <li>Follow-on media: Aftonbladet investigation into social dumping employers likely</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10445">HD10445<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10445 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Minister for Housing regarding social segregation and housing allocation
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Erik Slottner (KD), Minister for Civil Affairs and Housing
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🟠 HIGH | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: Medium-High</p>
 <p>Housing segregation is a perennial Swedish political issue. Slottner is targeted twice on the same day (HD10443 + HD10445) — a deliberate double-targeting strategy by S to depict him as failing Sweden's vulnerable housing population on multiple dimensions.</p>
 <p>The housing segregation framing links to committee reports HD01CU27/28 (civil law, housing allocations) already in progress through Riksdag. S's strategic logic: Slottner's proposals are insufficient to address structural segregation.</p>
 <p><strong>Electoral relevance</strong>: Housing affordability and segregation are top-3 voter concerns in Sweden 2026, particularly for the urban progressive segment (voter-segmentation.md Segment 2). The double interpellation (HD10443 + HD10445) maximises media presence on the housing-welfare nexus.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-3">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-3">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval</li>
 <li>Content: [B2] Substance inferred from title + betänkande cross-reference HD01CU27/28</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Electoral relevance inferred from voter concern surveys</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-3">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-3">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Slottner's debate answer (HD10445): 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: HD01CU27/28 committee reports — if Slottner's answer points to these as his action, S can rebut with insufficiency claims</li>
 <li>Media: DN/SVT housing desk likely to use this as hook for housing segregation investigation</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10446">HD10446<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10446 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation | <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Source authority</strong>: [A1] riksdagen.se direct retrieval</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Interpellation to Minister regarding Skatteverket/Socialstyrelsen false death record declarations affecting living citizens
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: S MP
 <strong>Target minister</strong>: Parisa Liljestrand (M) or Gabriel Wikström-equivalent — Minister for Social Affairs or Digital Governance (minister identity to be confirmed from interpellation text)
 <strong>Note</strong>: In the interpellation cluster context, HD10446 is the fourth interpellation in 24 hours; based on title pattern, it addresses cases where citizens were incorrectly declared deceased in official records, affecting their access to healthcare, social insurance, and banking [B2]
 <strong>Expected debate</strong>: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Significance tier</strong>: 🔴 CRITICAL | <strong>DIW weight</strong>: High</p>
 <p>False death declarations in Swedish welfare state registers (folkbokföring, Skatteverket, Socialstyrelsen) are a digital governance failure with direct harm to individuals. Citizens falsely registered as deceased lose access to healthcare appointments, social insurance payments (Försäkringskassan), and banking services.</p>
 <p><strong>Why this is HIGH significance</strong>: This issue directly undermines the Swedish welfare state's core identity — the precision and reliability of the folkbokföring register. A government that cannot correctly track who is alive has a fundamental administrative credibility problem.</p>
 <p><strong>Political vulnerability</strong>: Unlike the employer contributions issue (which requires knowledge of tax law to assess), false death declarations are immediately comprehensible to every voter. Media can humanise the story with specific victim accounts. This is potentially the most media-viral issue in the interpellation cluster.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-rating-4">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-rating-4">Admiralty Rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-rating-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Source: [A1] Riksdag API direct retrieval (filing confirmed)</li>
 <li>Content: [B3] Substantial substance inferred from title pattern only — full text not retrieved</li>
 <li>Impact assessment: [B2] Electoral significance based on comparable welfare-state failure stories in 2022–2025 media</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-watch-4">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-watch-4">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-watch-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Minister debate answer: 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05</li>
 <li>JO risk: HIGH — false death declarations are exactly the type of systemic failure JO investigates</li>
@@ -2083,21 +2083,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-watch-4">Forward Watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Socialstyrelsen/Skatteverket response: Agency heads may be called to parliamentary committee hearing</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-context-september-2026">Electoral Context (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-context-september-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-context-september-2026">Electoral Context (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-context-september-2026"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: 13 September 2026 (second Sunday of September, confirmed by electoral calendar)
 <strong>Time remaining</strong>: ~145 days</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-events--electoral-significance">Today's Events — Electoral Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-events--electoral-significance"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance">S Accountability Offensive (HIGH significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-events--electoral-significance">Today's Events — Electoral Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-events--electoral-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance">S Accountability Offensive (HIGH significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-accountability-offensive-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10444, HD10445, HD10446, HD10443 + pre-existing HD10442 represent a coordinated S campaign to frame Finance Minister Svantesson and coalition ministers as managing public funds irresponsibly. Electoral logic: S needs to recover fiscal competence image lost during 2014–2022 government tenure. The interpellation strategy targets the coalition's own fiscal credibility narrative [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance">HD01FiU48 Enacted (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance">HD01FiU48 Enacted (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-enacted-moderate-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>The coalition can point to a tangible consumer-benefit delivery (fuel cost relief from 1 May 2026) in the election campaign. Historically, Swedish voters reward demonstrable delivery in their daily costs. Risk: the cut is small enough (82 öre/L) to be lost in price volatility [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance">Energy Legislation Sprint (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance">Energy Legislation Sprint (MODERATE significance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-legislation-sprint-moderate-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>8+ propositions submitted April 13–16 creates a legislative legacy narrative for the coalition: electricity system reform (HD03240), wind power (HD03239), environmental permitting (HD03238) = energy security agenda heading into election [A1].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling">Current Seat Projections (as of April 2026 polling)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling">Current Seat Projections (as of April 2026 polling)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling"></a></h3>
 <p><em>Note: Based on polling aggregates — exact figures subject to polling error ±2–3 seats per party</em></p>
 
 
@@ -2155,7 +2155,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-as-of-april-2026-polling">Current Seat Proje
 <strong>C pivot</strong>: ~20–28 seats</p>
 <p><em>4% threshold risk</em>: L near threshold; MP borderline</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd">Scenario Impact on Seats (from scenario-analysis.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd">Scenario Impact on Seats (from scenario-analysis.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2183,7 +2183,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-impact-on-seats-from-scenario-analysismd">Scenario Impact on
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Expected seat change</th><th>Winner</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Scenario 1 (Accountability Breakthrough)</td><td>S +5–8, M -3–5</td><td>Opposition likely government</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario 2 (Narrative Containment)</td><td>No material change; C determines outcome</td><td>Coin toss</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario 3 (Opposition Fragmentation)</td><td>C aligns with Tidö post-election; Tidö continuation</td><td>Tidö re-election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle">Electoral Risk Indicators for This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle">Electoral Risk Indicators for This Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Svantesson interpellation answer quality</strong> [WATCH 2026-04-28]: Poor answer → S picks up 2–4 points in next poll</li>
 <li><strong>L threshold risk</strong>: Any L internal crisis + low polling → 4% threshold loss → Tidö loses 12–16 seats overnight</li>
@@ -2203,9 +2203,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-indicators-for-this-cycle">Electoral Risk Indicators f
     Fuel tax consumer impact: [0.3, 0.5]
     Energy legislation: [0.2, 0.4]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2265,27 +2265,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag S
 <p><strong>Tidö governing majority</strong>: M+KD+L = 103 seats; with SD support = 176 seats (majority = 175)
 <strong>Opposition potential</strong>: S+V+MP = 149; needs C (24) for 173 — short of majority without SD or breakdown of Tidö</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026">Post-Election Scenario Mathematics (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support">Coalition A: Tidö Continuation (M+KD+L+SD support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026">Post-Election Scenario Mathematics (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-scenario-mathematics-september-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support">Coalition A: Tidö Continuation (M+KD+L+SD support)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-a-tidö-continuation-mkdlsd-support"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires M+KD+L ≥ 100 + SD ≥ 70 → ≥ 175/349</li>
 <li>Current probability: MODERATE (scenario 2 → 55%)</li>
 <li>Risk: L drops below 4% threshold → Tidö loses 16 seats → falls to ~159/349 → minority without SD active support</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc">Coalition B: S-led alternative (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc">Coalition B: S-led alternative (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-b-s-led-alternative-svmpc"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires S ≥ 95 + V ≥ 20 + MP ≥ 15 + C ≥ 24 → ≥ 154/349 (majority = 175 — falls short)</li>
 <li>S+V+MP+C needs more: requires either S >102 or C > 28 to reach 175</li>
 <li>Current probability: LOW-MODERATE; only viable under Scenario 1 (accountability breakthrough)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain">Coalition C: Grand Centre Bloc (M+C+L+S abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain">Coalition C: Grand Centre Bloc (M+C+L+S abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-c-grand-centre-bloc-mcls-abstain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Requires M+C+L ≥ 115 (passive S abstention or confidence-and-supply)</li>
 <li>Historically rejected by Swedish political culture; not plausible without crisis</li>
 <li>Current probability: VERY LOW</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts">Today's Electoral Mathematics Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts">Today's Electoral Mathematics Shifts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-todays-electoral-mathematics-shifts">Today's Electoral Mathematics Sh
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Event</th><th>Direction</th><th>Seat impact estimate</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S accountability offensive (HD10444/443/445/446)</td><td>S +1–3% if KJ-1 materialises</td><td>+3–9 seats for S bloc [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48 fuel cut enacted</td><td>Coalition claim +0.5–1% with rural segment</td><td>+1–3 seats for Tidö [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>C deportation nuance (HD024095)</td><td>C towards independent pivot</td><td>C seat-share unchanged; coalition arithmetic risk</td></tr><tr><td>Energy legislation sprint</td><td>Coalition credibility signal</td><td>No immediate seat impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity">Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity">Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Critical 4% threshold parties</strong>: L (currently ~4.5%) and MP (currently ~3.8–4.2%)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>If L falls below 4%: Tidö coalition loses 16 seats → drops to ~159 with SD → below majority</li>
@@ -2333,34 +2333,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-threshold-sensitivity">Sainte-Laguë Threshold Sensitiv
     line [175, 175, 175, 175]</pre>
 <p><em>Note: 175 = majority threshold. Tidö current projects above threshold; S bloc Scenario 1 projects below.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive">Segment 1: Rural/Commuter Voters (Fuel-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive">Segment 1: Rural/Commuter Voters (Fuel-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-1-ruralcommuter-voters-fuel-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~800,000 households outside major metropolitan areas with daily car dependency (SCB transport survey estimate)
 <strong>Impact of HD01FiU48</strong>: DIRECT POSITIVE — 82 öre/litre visible at pump from May 1, 2026. Monthly saving for average commuter (~1,500 km/month, 7L/100km): approximately 87 SEK/month. Tangible but modest. [A2 SCB proxy]
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: Historically split between M/SD/C; this measure targets all three parties' core rural base
 <strong>Risk</strong>: C and M compete for this segment's credit; SD may claim insufficient relief</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive">Segment 2: Urban Progressive Voters (Climate-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive">Segment 2: Urban Progressive Voters (Climate-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-2-urban-progressive-voters-climate-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: Stockholm/Gothenburg/Malmö metro — approximately 2.8 million voters
 <strong>Impact of HD01FiU48</strong>: NEGATIVE FRAMING — MP and V interpellations against fuel cut tap into this segment's climate anxiety. HD024098 (MP fuel tax motion) and HD024092 (V motion) directly represent this segment's opposition [A1]
 <strong>Impact of Energy legislation (HD03240/239)</strong>: MIXED — electricity system reform + wind power incentives play positively with this segment; coal → renewables framing resonates
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: S/MP/V core; some L and C voters</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive">Segment 3: Public Sector Workers (Accountability-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive">Segment 3: Public Sector Workers (Accountability-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-3-public-sector-workers-accountability-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~700,000 municipal and regional government employees
 <strong>Impact of HD10443</strong> (inter-municipal social welfare transfers): DIRECTLY RELEVANT — social workers and welfare administrators most aware of this policy failure [A1]
 <strong>Impact of HD10444</strong> (employer contributions to social dumping): Secondary relevance — fiscal solidarity frame resonates
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: S core voters; moderate turnout amplification if accountability narrative strengthens</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive">Segment 4: Youth and First-Time Voters (Agency/Justice-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive">Segment 4: Youth and First-Time Voters (Agency/Justice-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-4-youth-and-first-time-voters-agencyjustice-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~300,000 voters aged 18–25 eligible for first time in 2026
 <strong>Impact of HD03246</strong> (unga lagöverträdare — youth criminal sentencing): DIRECTLY RELEVANT — reform of juvenile justice affects this cohort's peers; reactions split between accountability hawks (SD base) and rehabilitation advocates (S/V/MP base) [A1]
 <strong>Impact of eating disorder court case (HD10442)</strong>: Tangentially relevant — eating disorders disproportionately affect youth; governmental accountability on healthcare resonates</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive">Segment 5: Business Owners and Self-Employed (Economic-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive">Segment 5: Business Owners and Self-Employed (Economic-Sensitive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-5-business-owners-and-self-employed-economic-sensitive"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Size</strong>: ~500,000 sole traders and SME owners registered in Bolagsverket (proxy)
 <strong>Impact of HD10444</strong> (employer contribution — S interpellation): COMPLEX — if employers are named as social dumping participants, this creates a defensive reaction in the broader business community even though the interpellation targets bad actors specifically. Risk of S being framed as anti-business [B2]
 <strong>Electoral leaning</strong>: M/C core; some L voters</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic">Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic">Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     S1["Segment 1: Rural/Commuter&#x3C;br/>~800k HH&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48 POSITIVE"] -->|"Credit competition"| COAL["Coalition M+SD+C"]
     S2["Segment 2: Urban Progressive&#x3C;br/>~2.8M voters&#x3C;br/>Fuel cut NEGATIVE / Energy MIXED"] -->|"Mobilisation"| OPP["Opposition S+MP+V"]
@@ -2378,12 +2378,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-segment-electoral-arithmetic">Cross-Segment Electoral Arithmeti
     style PIVOT fill:#6a1b9a,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <p><strong>Net electoral vector</strong>: NEUTRAL to SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE for coalition among swing segments. S offensive mobilises public sector base (Segment 3) but risks Segment 5 backlash. HD01FiU48 benefits Segment 1 but C/SD/M split credit. Election outcome remains contingent on C pivot (see coalition-mathematics.md).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark (Nordic peer), Germany (EU large economy), United Kingdom (non-EU Westminster model)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure">Issue 1: Fuel Tax Cuts as Electoral Relief Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-framework">Comparative Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure">Issue 1: Fuel Tax Cuts as Electoral Relief Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2415,7 +2415,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-1-fuel-tax-cuts-as-electoral-relief-measure">Issue 1: Fuel Tax
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Recent Action</th><th>Comparator Evidence</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>82 öre/litre cut (HD01FiU48, 2026-04-21); temporary May–Sep 2026; EU minimum floor</td><td>Government used temporary relief framing, justified by Middle East conflict + high energy prices</td><td>riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>2022 Tankrabatt — 35 cents/litre cut for 3 months (June–August 2022)</td><td>Bundesregierung (Scholz) passed similar temporary fuel relief during Ukraine war energy shock; 3 billion EUR cost</td><td>bundesregierung.de (Tankrabatt 2022)</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>No direct fuel tax cut in 2022–2026 period; instead targeted heating subsidies</td><td>Denmark preferred household energy subsidies over transport fuel cuts; different income-group distribution</td><td>ft.dk (heating subsidies 2022)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden's approach most closely parallels Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt in structure (temporary, EU-minimum anchored, justified by external shock). Germany's Tankrabatt was heavily criticised by climate groups as distributional regressive and emissions-inefficient — same critique applies to HD01FiU48. However, the German precedent also shows temporary fuel cuts are generally accepted as legitimate emergency relief and do not produce permanent electoral realignment. Sweden's MP and V opposition (HD024098, HD024092) mirrors German Green/SPD-left criticism in 2022.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns">Issue 2: Parliamentary Accountability Interpellations — Ministerial Targeting Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns">Issue 2: Parliamentary Accountability Interpellations — Ministerial Targeting Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-targeting-patterns"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-2-parliamentary-accountability-interpellations--ministerial-tar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Pattern</th><th>Comparator Evidence</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>4 interpellations in 24 hours targeting one minister</td><td>Uncommon intensity; confirms coordinated campaign [B2]</td><td>riksdagen.se HD10444–446</td></tr><tr><td>United Kingdom</td><td>PMQs as equivalent weekly ministerial accountability</td><td>UK Opposition regularly "loads" PMQs with coordinated questions on one minister; 6 questions per session standard</td><td>UK Parliament Hansard</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>Fragestunde — 60-question session monthly</td><td>Opposition groups coordinate thematic question clusters; equivalent pattern but slower pace</td><td>Bundestag Geschäftsordnung §105</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden's interpellation mechanism is more formally structured than UK PMQs but less frequent. The pattern of 4 interpellations in 24 hours targeting one minister (Svantesson) is the Swedish equivalent of a "PMQ blitz" — an intensification that signals pre-election political season has begun. This is normal behaviour for advanced democratic parliaments in election years; the analytical significance is the target selection (Svantesson, highest-profile fiscal figure) not the tactic itself.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative">Issue 3: Municipal Social Dumping — International Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative">Issue 3: Municipal Social Dumping — International Comparative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-3-municipal-social-dumping--international-comparative">Issue 3:
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Policy</th><th>Comparator Evidence</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>HD10443 — documented inter-municipal social welfare transfers without consent</td><td>No national law prohibiting informal municipal "recommendations" to residents to relocate</td><td>riksdagen.se HD10443</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>Copenhagen municipality has used relocation incentive schemes for social housing</td><td>Controversial; subject to Parliamentary review 2019–2022; partial reform adopted</td><td>ft.dk social housing debates</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>Municipal residency requirements restrictions — ruled partly unconstitutional</td><td>Court ruling 2023 limited municipal power to block welfare recipients; social dumping concept present</td><td>rechtspraak.nl</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden is not alone in facing inter-municipal social welfare dumping dynamics. The Dutch and Danish precedents suggest that legislative solutions (residency protection laws) are technically feasible but politically contested when municipal autonomy interests collide with central welfare state principles. The HD10443 interpellation raises a genuine governance gap that any post-2026 government will need to address.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     SE["🇸🇪 Sweden&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48 fuel cut&#x3C;br/>HD10444 accountability&#x3C;br/>HD10443 social dumping"] --> NORM["Nordic/EU norm check"]
     DE["🇩🇪 Germany&#x3C;br/>Tankrabatt 2022&#x3C;br/>precedent"] --> NORM
@@ -2499,9 +2499,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
     style OUT2 fill:#f57f17,color:#000000
     style OUT3 fill:#e65100,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election">Parallel 1: The 1994 Fuel Tax Cut Pre-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election">Parallel 1: The 1994 Fuel Tax Cut Pre-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical event</strong>: In spring 1994, the Bildt government (M-led) faced mounting economic pressure and introduced limited energy cost relief measures before the September 1994 election. The economic crisis context (Sweden's 1990s banking crisis) dominated the campaign. The government lost; S returned to power.</p>
 <p><strong>Parallels to 2026</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-1-the-1994-fuel-tax-cut-pre-election">Parallel 1: The 1994 F
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: 1994 crisis was far more severe (banking system collapse, currency peg collapse). 2026 context is inflationary pressure post-COVID/Ukraine, not systemic financial crisis. The relief measure's electoral effectiveness is therefore less certain to be overwhelmed by wider crisis dynamics.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2] — historical parallel based on secondary sources; direct documentation available in Riksdagsbiblioteket</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government">Parallel 2: 2018 SD Accountability Interpellations Against Löfven Government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government">Parallel 2: 2018 SD Accountability Interpellations Against Löfven Government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-government"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical event</strong>: In the pre-election period of spring 2018, SD filed a cluster of accountability interpellations targeting S Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson on migration costs. The interpellations received moderate media coverage. SD picked up seats in September 2018 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Parallels to 2026</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2523,7 +2523,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-2-2018-sd-accountability-interpellations-against-löfven-gov
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: SD in 2018 targeted Andersson on immigration/costs — a domain where SD had comparative advantage. S in 2026 targets Svantesson on labour market exploitation and welfare fraud — a domain where S traditionally has credibility. S's strategic positioning is arguably stronger than SD's was in 2018 on these issues.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2] — interpellation records available in riksdagen.se but specific 2018 cluster not independently verified in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint">Parallel 3: 2010 Reinfeldt Alliansen Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint">Parallel 3: 2010 Reinfeldt Alliansen Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Historical event</strong>: In spring 2010, the Reinfeldt Alliansen government (M+C+KD+FP) filed a substantial pre-election legislative package covering work-life reforms, infrastructure, and social insurance modifications. The "work-first" narrative dominated the campaign. Alliansen won re-election with an increased mandate.</p>
 <p><strong>Parallels to 2026</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2534,7 +2534,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-3-2010-reinfeldt-alliansen-legislative-sprint">Parallel 3: 2
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: 2010 Alliansen had a more unified single economic narrative ("the work-first society") than the current Tidö coalition which spans from nationalist-conservative (SD) to liberal (L) on social policy.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: [B2] — parallel based on well-documented 2010 campaign record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-lessons-for-2026">Historical Lessons for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-lessons-for-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-lessons-for-2026">Historical Lessons for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-lessons-for-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2578,10 +2578,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-lessons-for-2026">Historical Lessons for 2026<a class="" a
         Energy legislation sprint : April 2026 - submitted
         Election 13 September 2026 : Outcome TBD</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessments">Feasibility Assessments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01">1. HD01FiU48 — Extra Budget / Fuel Tax Cut (Effective 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessments">Feasibility Assessments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01">1. HD01FiU48 — Extra Budget / Fuel Tax Cut (Effective 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation status</strong>: ENACTED (Riksdag vote 2026-04-21) [A1]
 <strong>Technical feasibility</strong>: HIGH — fuel tax adjustment via Energiskattelagen. Skatteverket has existing mechanisms for overnight tax rate change.
 <strong>Operational risk</strong>: LOW — logistics pre-notified to fuel retailers; automatic pump price adjustment follows normal supplier pricing cycle
@@ -2589,26 +2589,26 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-hd01fiu48--extra-budget--fuel-tax-cut-effective-2026-05-01">1. HD01
 <strong>Political risk</strong>: LOW for implementation; HIGH for attribution (opposition will challenge whether fuel prices actually drop at pump)
 <strong>GDPR/legal risk</strong>: NONE — straightforward tax law amendment
 <strong>Residual risk</strong>: Pump price lag (retailers adjust prices weekly not daily; 82 öre saving may be invisible in first week post-May 1) → media expectation management needed</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform">2. HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet (Electricity System Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform">2. HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet (Electricity System Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-electricity-system-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation status</strong>: SUBMITTED to Riksdag 2026-04-14; awaiting committee report [A1]
 <strong>Technical feasibility</strong>: MODERATE — systemic reform of electricity market regulation requires Energimyndigheten implementation framework
 <strong>Operational risk</strong>: MODERATE — new market rules require grid operator coordination (Svenska kraftnät)
 <strong>Timeline risk</strong>: MODERATE — committee report needed by June 2026; Riksdag vote before summer recess; if deferred to autumn, implementation begins after election under (possibly different) government
 <strong>Political risk</strong>: LOW-MODERATE — energy system reform has broad support; SD's nuclear preference adds complexity but does not block passage
 <strong>Residual risk</strong>: Election calendar risk — reform adopted May/June but implemented September+ means a different government may administer it</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain">3. HD10444–HD10446 Interpellation Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain">3. HD10444–HD10446 Interpellation Accountability Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd10444hd10446-interpellation-accountability-chain"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation feasibility</strong>: N/A — interpellations are accountability instruments, not legislation
 <strong>Response feasibility</strong>: Svantesson must provide substantive answers to all 3 within the standard interpellation debate window (approximately 2026-04-28 to 2026-05-05)
 <strong>Preparation risk</strong>: HIGH — three separate domains (employer contributions, social dumping, false death records) require cross-ministry briefing in 6 days
 <strong>Procedural timeline</strong>: Interpellation filed → speaker schedules debate → minister answers → follow-up questions → debate ends
 <strong>Risk of non-answer</strong>: LOW — Swedish parliamentary convention requires minister to engage substantively; refusal to answer is a political cost signal</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform">4. HD03246 — Unga lagöverträdare (Youth Offender Sentencing Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform">4. HD03246 — Unga lagöverträdare (Youth Offender Sentencing Reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03246--unga-lagöverträdare-youth-offender-sentencing-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Implementation status</strong>: SUBMITTED to Riksdag 2026-04-16 [A1]
 <strong>Technical feasibility</strong>: HIGH — judicial reform with clear Domstolsverket implementation pathway
 <strong>Timeline risk</strong>: MODERATE — committee review Justitieutskottet; expected vote May/June 2026
 <strong>Social risk</strong>: MODERATE — reforms to juvenile justice generate civil society pushback; youth rights organisations active</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-risk-summary">Feasibility Risk Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-risk-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-risk-summary">Feasibility Risk Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-risk-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2677,34 +2677,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-risk-summary">Feasibility Risk Summary<a class="" aria-hi
     section Post-election
         HD01KU33/32 constitutional       :crit, 2026-09-15, 2027-03-01</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment">Hypothesis H1: S Accountability Offensive Is Election-Year Strategy (Primary Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment">Hypothesis H1: S Accountability Offensive Is Election-Year Strategy (Primary Assessment)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-s-accountability-offensive-is-election-year-strategy-primary-assessment"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: 4 interpellations in 24 hours, same MP authorship cluster, identical Svantesson targeting pattern, timing (5 months before September 2026 election) [A1]
 <strong>Evidence against</strong>: Interpellations are a standard parliamentary tool used continuously throughout the term; the 2026-04-22 cluster may coincide with end-of-session filing deadline, not strategic choice [A2]
 <strong>ACH weight</strong>: Strong evidence for [A1]; weak countervailing evidence [A2] → H1 stands as primary</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering">Hypothesis H2: Fuel Tax Cut (HD01FiU48) Is Genuine Emergency Relief, Not Electioneering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering">Hypothesis H2: Fuel Tax Cut (HD01FiU48) Is Genuine Emergency Relief, Not Electioneering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-fuel-tax-cut-hd01fiu48-is-genuine-emergency-relief-not-electioneering"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: FiU48 cites EU energy market conditions, Middle East conflict impacts, inflation spike — all documented real-world triggers [A1]; the measure stays at EU minimum floor, not a maximum cut [A2]
 <strong>Evidence against</strong>: Timing (May 2026 start = 4 months before election) suggests electoral calendar influence; no sunset clause makes "temporary" framing weak [B2]; climate expert consensus is that fuel tax cuts are regressive and emission-inefficient [B2]
 <strong>ACH weight</strong>: Mixed [B2+B2] — both emergency relief AND electoral relief are likely simultaneously true; neither hypothesis excludes the other</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on">Hypothesis H3: Slottner/Carlson Interpellations (HD10445/HD10446) Represent New Accountability Fronts, Not Follow-On<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on">Hypothesis H3: Slottner/Carlson Interpellations (HD10445/HD10446) Represent New Accountability Fronts, Not Follow-On<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-slottnercarlson-interpellations-hd10445hd10446-represent-new-accountability-fronts-not-follow-on"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: Slottner (HD10445, social dumping/KD) and Carlson (HD10446, false death declarations/KD) raise completely different policy domains than Svantesson's financial/fiscal domain [A1]; different S MP authors [A1]
 <strong>Evidence against</strong>: All 4 interpellations filed same day by S MPs — coordination signal regardless of domain [A1]; S parliamentary group coordination meetings would explain simultaneous filing [A2]
 <strong>ACH weight</strong>: H3 (independent fronts) has some support but H1 (coordinated campaign) is more parsimonious given same-day filing [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong">Competing Hypotheses — What Could This Analysis Get Wrong?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire">Red Team Challenge 1: "The Accountability Offensive Will Backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong">Competing Hypotheses — What Could This Analysis Get Wrong?<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses--what-could-this-analysis-get-wrong"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire">Red Team Challenge 1: "The Accountability Offensive Will Backfire"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-1-the-accountability-offensive-will-backfire"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate argument</strong>: Finance Minister Svantesson has survived multiple media cycles including the 2025 budget controversy. S has limited ability to convert interpellation success into vote-switching because their core voters are already committed, and the swingable voters (C, L-leaning) are more concerned about welfare state competence than about ministerial accountability theatrics. HD10444 (employer contributions to social dumping employers) may alienate the very small-business and self-employed voters S needs to win back.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge</strong>: Poll data showing S polling above 31% after the interpellation cycle; media coverage classified as "accountability" not "theatre" by neutral outlets [B2 required].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect">Red Team Challenge 2: "HD01FiU48 Has No Electoral Effect"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect">Red Team Challenge 2: "HD01FiU48 Has No Electoral Effect"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-2-hd01fiu48-has-no-electoral-effect"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate argument</strong>: Fuel tax cuts are politically effective only when consumers see an immediate visible effect at the pump. The 82 öre/litre cut (approximately 8 kr per tankful for a typical car) is smaller than normal pump price volatility (10–15 kr/L swings). Voters do not attribute diffuse tax cuts to specific government decisions. The fuel tax cut will be invisible in election-day retrospective assessments.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge</strong>: Swedish consumer sentiment data showing government approval increase in May 2026 fuel period [B2 required]; or alternatively, opposition research showing the cut is too small to matter (which would validate this red team challenge).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story">Red Team Challenge 3: "The Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU33/32) Are the Real Long-Term Story"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story">Red Team Challenge 3: "The Constitutional Amendments (HD01KU33/32) Are the Real Long-Term Story"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-3-the-constitutional-amendments-hd01ku3332-are-the-real-long-term-story"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Devil's Advocate argument</strong>: The realtime monitor analysis is over-indexing on visible interpellation drama and underweighting the structural constitutional amendments (HD01KU33/32) that require a post-2026 election second vote. These amendments — which may concern fundamental rights or electoral rules — will have lasting effects far beyond the current legislative session. The interpellation cycle is ephemeral; the constitutional amendments are permanent.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidentiary requirement to dismiss this challenge</strong>: Read HD01KU33 and HD01KU32 full text to assess whether they concern electoral mechanisms or fundamental rights (which would elevate their significance rating); currently assessed [B2] due to title-only review.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-summary-table">ACH Summary Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-summary-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-summary-table">ACH Summary Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-summary-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2761,10 +2761,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-summary-table">ACH Summary Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Evidence For</th><th>Evidence Against</th><th>ACH Weight</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1: S offensive = election strategy</td><td>[A1] 4 interpel. same day, Svantesson × 3</td><td>[A2] end-of-session filing deadline</td><td>Strong</td><td><strong>SUPPORTED</strong></td></tr><tr><td>H2: FiU48 = emergency relief</td><td>[A1] EU energy conditions, inflation</td><td>[B2] electoral timing, weak sunset</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>PARTIAL — dual motive likely</strong></td></tr><tr><td>H3: Slottner/Carlson = independent fronts</td><td>[A1] different domains</td><td>[A1] same-day S filing</td><td>Weak</td><td><strong>REJECTED — coordination more parsimonious</strong></td></tr><tr><td>RC1: S offensive backfires</td><td>[B2] Svantesson survival history</td><td>[B2] poll evidence needed</td><td>TBD</td><td><strong>WATCH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>RC2: FiU48 invisible electorally</td><td>[B2] pump-price volatility argument</td><td>[B2] consumer sentiment needed</td><td>TBD</td><td><strong>WATCH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>RC3: Constitutional amendments underweighted</td><td>[B2] structural long-term</td><td>[B2] requires full text review</td><td>TBD</td><td><strong>FLAG for follow-on</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions">Classification Framework (7 Dimensions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimensions">Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions">Classification Framework (7 Dimensions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-framework-7-dimensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimensions">Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimensions"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Policy Domain</strong> — Primary policy area</li>
 <li><strong>Political Valence</strong> — Partisan direction (government/opposition/cross-party)</li>
@@ -2775,8 +2775,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimensions">Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li><strong>Retention</strong> — Analytical retention period</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classifications">Document Classifications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classifications"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation">HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgift Abuse [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classifications">Document Classifications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classifications"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation">HD10444 — Arbetsgivaravgift Abuse [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2815,7 +2815,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10444--arbetsgivaravgift-abuse-interpellation">HD10444 — Arbetsgi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Fiscal policy / Labour market</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition attack (S → M coalition)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed — awaiting ministerial answer</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>IMMEDIATE — debate scheduled within 2 weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — core fiscal credibility narrative for Election 2026</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed; Data minimisation applied</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>5 years (electoral significance)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation">HD10443 — Social Dumpning [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation">HD10443 — Social Dumpning [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2854,7 +2854,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10443--social-dumpning-interpellation">HD10443 — Social Dumpning
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Social welfare / Municipal governance</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition (S → KD)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>IMMEDIATE</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — welfare state protection narrative</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>5 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation">HD10445 — Housing Pre-emption [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation">HD10445 — Housing Pre-emption [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2893,7 +2893,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10445--housing-pre-emption-interpellation">HD10445 — Housing Pre-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Housing policy / Urban segregation</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition (S → KD)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>NEAR-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — Stockholm suburban segregation</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly filed</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>5 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation">HD10446 — False Death Declarations [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation">HD10446 — False Death Declarations [Interpellation]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2932,7 +2932,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10446--false-death-declarations-interpellation">HD10446 — False D
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Civil administration / Skatteverket</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Opposition (S → M)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Interpellation filed</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>NEAR-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>MEDIUM — administrative competence framing</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9(2)(g) public interest; data minimisation</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>3 years</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget [Betänkande ENACTED]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted">HD01FiU48 — Extra Ändringsbudget [Betänkande ENACTED]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2971,7 +2971,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--extra-ändringsbudget-betänkande-enacted">HD01FiU48 — E
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Fiscal policy / Energy pricing</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Cross-party (M+SD+KD+L+C majority)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td><strong>Enacted</strong> — 2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>HIGH — takes effect 2026-05-01</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — government relief narrative</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>N/A (legislative, no personal data)</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Permanent (legislative record)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition">HD03240 — Nya Lagar om Elsystemet [Proposition]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition">HD03240 — Nya Lagar om Elsystemet [Proposition]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3010,7 +3010,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03240--nya-lagar-om-elsystemet-proposition">HD03240 — Nya Lagar o
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Energy policy / Electricity system</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Proposition submitted — committee review pending</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>MEDIUM-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>HIGH — energy security + climate narratives</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Permanent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions">HD03232/HD03231 — Ukraine Tribunals [Propositions]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions">HD03232/HD03231 — Ukraine Tribunals [Propositions]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3050,22 +3050,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03232hd03231--ukraine-tribunals-propositions">HD03232/HD03231 — U
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Classification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Policy Domain</td><td>Foreign affairs / International law</td></tr><tr><td>Political Valence</td><td>Government (broad consensus expected)</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative Stage</td><td>Propositions submitted</td></tr><tr><td>Urgency</td><td>MEDIUM-TERM</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral Relevance</td><td>MEDIUM — Sweden's Ukraine solidarity stance</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Permanent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-classification">Priority Tier Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-classification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring">Tier P0 — Highest Priority (immediate monitoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-classification">Priority Tier Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-classification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring">Tier P0 — Highest Priority (immediate monitoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--highest-priority-immediate-monitoring"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10444, HD10443, HD10445 (interpellations targeting ministers)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate">Tier P1 — High Priority (track through committee/debate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate">Tier P1 — High Priority (track through committee/debate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-priority-track-through-committeedebate"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 (enacted — implementation monitoring)</li>
 <li>HD03240 (new electricity system law — committee)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p2--standard-priority">Tier P2 — Standard Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--standard-priority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p2--standard-priority">Tier P2 — Standard Priority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--standard-priority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03232, HD03231, HD03246, HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD03242</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-information-access-control">Information Access Control<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-access-control"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-access-control">Information Access Control<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-access-control"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents: <strong>Public access</strong> (Offentlighetsprincipen — Swedish Freedom of the Press Act)</li>
 <li>Source: data.riksdagen.se (official open data)</li>
@@ -3083,53 +3083,53 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-access-control">Information Access Control<a class="" ari
     style TRACK fill:#f57f17,color:#000000
     style REVIEW fill:#1976d2,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence">Cluster A — Fiscal &#x26; Economic Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence">Cluster A — Fiscal &#x26; Economic Coherence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--fiscal--economic-coherence"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 ↔ HD03236 (Extra budget prop.) ↔ HD024098/092 (opposition motions)</li>
 <li>HD10444 ↔ employer contribution reduction (enacted April 2026) ↔ Aftonbladet investigation</li>
 <li>Cluster logic: The fuel tax relief and employer contribution policy share the same fiscal instrument (tax reduction for economic stimulus) and the same accountability vulnerability (risk of exploitation)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package">Cluster B — Ukraine Diplomatic Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package">Cluster B — Ukraine Diplomatic Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--ukraine-diplomatic-package"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03232 ↔ HD03231 (both Utrikesdepartementet, both 2026-04-16)</li>
 <li>Both represent Sweden's commitment to Ukraine's transitional justice architecture</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: Sweden's NATO membership context (ratified 2024) amplifies the diplomatic significance</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition">Cluster C — Energy &#x26; Climate Transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition">Cluster C — Energy &#x26; Climate Transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy--climate-transition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03240 (Nya lagar om elsystemet) ↔ HD03239 (Vindkraft i kommuner) ↔ HD03238 (Ny miljöprövningsmyndighet)</li>
 <li>Three-part energy reform package submitted April 13–14, 2026</li>
 <li>Thematic coherence: electricity system law + wind power incentives + environmental permitting reform</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today">Cluster D — Parliamentary Accountability (Today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today">Cluster D — Parliamentary Accountability (Today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--parliamentary-accountability-today"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10444 ↔ HD10443 ↔ HD10445 ↔ HD10446 (all S interpellations, 2026-04-22)</li>
 <li>HD10442 (filed 2026-04-21, S/Svantesson eating disorder)</li>
 <li>Cluster logic: 5 interpellations in 2 days, 3 targeting Svantesson = coordinated S campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform">Cluster E — Constitutional Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform">Cluster E — Constitutional Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--constitutional-reform"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01KU33 ↔ HD01KU32 (both KU betänkanden, both constitutional amendments first reading, 2026-04-17)</li>
 <li>Both require second vote after 2026 election to become law — creates a post-election governance agenda</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief">Chain 1: Fuel Tax Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief">Chain 1: Fuel Tax Relief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fuel-tax-relief"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>prop. 2025/26:236 (HD03236) →
 FiU48 (HD01FiU48, adopted 2026-04-21) →
 Law amendment (effective 2026-05-01) →
 Opposition motions HD024098/092 (overridden)
 </code></pre>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform">Chain 2: Energy System Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform">Chain 2: Energy System Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-energy-system-reform"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>prop. 2025/26:240 (HD03240) →
 prop. 2025/26:239 (HD03239) →
 prop. 2025/26:238 (HD03238) →
 Committee review (pending)
 </code></pre>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability">Chain 3: Ministerial Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability">Chain 3: Ministerial Accountability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>Past Svantesson statements →
 Aftonbladet investigation →
 HD10444 interpellation (2026-04-22) →
@@ -3137,33 +3137,33 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-3-ministerial-accountability">Chain 3: Ministerial Accountabili
 [Potential KU review]
 </code></pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations">Sibling Folders — Tier-C Cross-Type Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations">Sibling Folders — Tier-C Cross-Type Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders--tier-c-cross-type-citations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22propositions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD03100 (vårproposition), HD03236 (extra budget), HD03240 (el-system), HD03239 (vindkraft), HD03238 (miljöprövning), HD03246 (unga), HD03231/232 (Ukraina)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: Propositions cluster C (energy reform) and cluster B (Ukraine) directly feed this realtime analysis</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "What is the coalition's energy security legislative timetable before September 2026 election?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22motions"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD024082–HD024098 (fuel tax opposition, deportation, arms)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: S/V/MP triple fuel tax rejection (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) establishes the opposition's climate-fiscal dividing line</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "How will opposition parties exploit the fuel tax cut in the election campaign?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22committeereports"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD01FiU48 (extra budget ENACTED), HD01KU33/32 (constitutional), HD01CU27/28 (housing)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: HD01FiU48 enacted — direct cause of today's accountability interpellations</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "When will KU constitutional amendments (KU33/32) come to second reading post-election?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations">analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-22interpellations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Synthesis summary reviewed: HD10442–HD10446 (S accountability offensive)</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: HD10442 (eating disorder, filed 2026-04-21) is the pre-existing live risk that today's new interpellations reinforce</li>
 <li>PIR inherited: "Is the S accountability strategy a one-day event or a sustained multi-week campaign?"</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S interpellation cluster</strong>: 4 interpellations in 24 hours, all authored by S MPs, all targeting coalition ministers on documented past statements or policy failures — clear coordination indicator [B2]</li>
 <li><strong>S+V+MP fuel tax motions</strong>: Three parties simultaneously filed fuel tax rejection motions on the same proposition — opportunistic coordination, not pre-planned (motions filed on different days but same legislative target) [B2]</li>
@@ -3181,11 +3181,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-Activity Patterns<a class=
     style IP fill:#e53935,color:#FFFFFF
     style RT fill:#c62828,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Standard</strong>: ICD 203 + Admiralty Code + SAT Catalog
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Cycle</strong>: Realtime-2338</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3243,7 +3243,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Standard</th><th>Implementation in This Cycle</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1: Accurately describe quality and reliability of underlying sources</td><td>All claims tagged [A1] (direct API), [A2] (confirmed secondary), [B2] (reported/inferred). Admiralty code applied per evidence type.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-2: Properly caveat analytic assessments</td><td>KJ-1/2/3 carry WEP band labels; PIR-2 explicitly states UNCERTAIN; KJ-2 uses MODERATE not HIGH.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-3: Distinguish between underlying intelligence and analyst judgment</td><td>Data retrieval (dok_id, titles, dates) separated from interpretive analysis (significance scoring, cluster logic).</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-4: Avoid analytical assumptions with insufficient basis</td><td>RC2 (fuel tax electoral impact) explicitly deferred to observable outcome; constitutional amendments (PIR-5) flagged for full-text review before rating.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-5: Incorporate alternative hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>ACH matrix in devils-advocate.md with 3 primary + 3 red team hypotheses; probability distribution in scenario-analysis.md.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-6: Articulate and explain change in analytic judgments</td><td>Prior-cycle PIR ingestion table in intelligence-assessment.md shows what changed from sibling cycle analysis. "Sustained campaign" upgraded from WATCH to ACTIVE based on today's 4 interpellations.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-7: Identify information gaps that could affect judgments</td><td>PIR-4 (consumer response), PIR-5 (KU33/32 full text), RC1/RC2/RC3 evidentiary requirements all stated.</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-8: Use consistent, unambiguous language with WEP terms</td><td>WEP terminology applied: "Almost certain" (KJ-3), "Likely" (KJ-1), "Roughly even" (KJ-2). No use of forbidden terms like "probable."</td><td>✅ Met</td></tr><tr><td>S-9: Properly coordinate, acknowledge disagreement with other analysts</td><td>No other analyst team in this run; Tier-C sibling synthesis acknowledged and cited.</td><td>✅ Met (single analyst acknowledged)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</strong>: Applied in devils-advocate.md — 3 hypotheses + 3 red team challenges with evidentiary requirements specified.</li>
 <li><strong>Scenario analysis</strong>: 3 scenarios (breakthrough, containment, fragmentation) with probability distribution summing to 100% in scenario-analysis.md.</li>
@@ -3257,7 +3257,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-applied">Structured Analytic Techn
 <li><strong>Probability calibration</strong>: WEP 7-band scale applied consistently with Admiralty source quality codes.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified">Methodology Improvements (Pass 2 Identified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified">Methodology Improvements (Pass 2 Identified)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Improve KJ-2 confidence</strong>: KJ-2 (fuel tax electoral impact) is currently MODERATE because consumer response is unobservable. Next cycle should include SCB CPI data or consumer confidence indices from the SCB MCP server to provide a quantitative anchor.</p>
@@ -3270,7 +3270,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-pass-2-identified">Methodology Improvements
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-limitations">Data Quality Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-limitations">Data Quality Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-limitations"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3303,10 +3303,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-quality-limitations">Data Quality Limitations<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Limitation</th><th>Impact</th><th>Mitigation applied</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>No full-text for all propositions (title + summary only)</td><td>KJ-3 confidence based on submission count, not content review</td><td>Flagged in data-download-manifest.md</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional amendments (HD01KU33/32) title-only</td><td>PIR-5 not rated</td><td>Explicitly deferred to follow-on</td></tr><tr><td>Consumer sentiment post-FiU48 not yet observable</td><td>KJ-2 capped at MODERATE</td><td>WEP MODERATE label applied</td></tr><tr><td>No vote record available for 2026-04-22 data</td><td>Voting patterns inferred from opposition motions</td><td>Cross-referenced with motion filing records [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-1">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-1"></a></h3>
 <p>All analysis in this cycle follows the osint-tradecraft-standards.md canon: ICD 203 audit above confirms 9/9 standards applied. Admiralty codes are [A1] (authoritative, confirmed), [A2] (authoritative, probably true), [B2] (reliable, probably true), [B3] (reliable, possibly true) — no fabricated or unrated claims committed to artifact files. PIR handoff to next cycle documented in intelligence-assessment.md §Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion with full resolution status.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-realtime-monitor
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24808210801
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-22T23:38:00Z
@@ -3314,13 +3314,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Effective Date</strong>: 2026-04-22
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Subfolder</strong>: realtime-2338</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-status">MCP Server Status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-status"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering: <strong>LIVE</strong> (verified via get_sync_status at 23:38:04Z)</li>
 <li>scb: available</li>
 <li>world-bank: available</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-breaking-news-signals-detected">Breaking News Signals Detected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-breaking-news-signals-detected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-breaking-news-signals-detected">Breaking News Signals Detected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-breaking-news-signals-detected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3352,8 +3352,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-breaking-news-signals-detected">Breaking News Signals Detected<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Priority</th><th>Category</th><th>Count</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CRITICAL</td><td>Today's interpellations</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td>Committee betänkanden (2026-04-21/22)</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td>Recent propositions (2026-04-14–16)</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Opposition motions on prop. 2025/26:236</td><td>5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-document-index">Document Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-index"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking">Primary: Today's Interpellations (2026-04-22) — Breaking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-document-index">Document Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-index"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking">Primary: Today's Interpellations (2026-04-22) — Breaking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3400,7 +3400,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-primary-todays-interpellations-2026-04-22--breaking">Primary: Today's
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Author</th><th>Target Minister</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar</td><td>Åsa Eriksson (S)</td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD10445</td><td>Kommunal förköpsrätt av nyckelfastigheter</td><td>Markus Kallifatides (S)</td><td>Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td>Jonathan Svensson (S)</td><td>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>Peder Björk (S)</td><td>Erik Slottner (KD)</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21">Secondary: Recent Betänkanden (2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21">Secondary: Recent Betänkanden (2026-04-21)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3449,7 +3449,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-secondary-recent-betänkanden-2026-04-21">Secondary: Recent Betänkan
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Committee</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 — bränsle/el/gas</td><td>FiU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning</td><td>TU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU42</td><td>Indelning i utgiftsområden</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU43</td><td>En ny lag om riksdagens medalj</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport — jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>MJU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17">Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17">Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3498,7 +3498,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tertiary-betänkanden-2026-04-17">Tertiary: Betänkanden (2026-04-17)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Committee</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i handlingar vid husrannsakan</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier</td><td>KU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU42</td><td>Riksrevisionens rapport — dödsbon</td><td>CU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Ett register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>CU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart</td><td>CU</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416">Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416">Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3577,7 +3577,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-recent-propositions-2026-04-1416">Recent Propositions (2026-04-14–1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Department</th><th>Date</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Nya krav på interoperabilitet — datadelning</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>Landsbygdsdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sveriges tillträde till internationell skadeståndskommission för Ukraina</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Sveriges anslutning till aggressionstribunalen för Ukraina</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>Klimat- och näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>Klimat- och näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>Klimat- och näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517">Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517">Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3672,19 +3672,50 @@ <h3 id="rm-opposition-motions-2026-04-1517">Opposition Motions (2026-04-15–17)
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Party</th><th>Dok-typ</th><th>Retrieved</th><th>Full-text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra budget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt (avslag)</td><td>MP</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra budget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt (avslag)</td><td>V</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler (avslag)</td><td>MP</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler (delvis)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler (avslag)</td><td>V</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>Krigsmaterielexport (förbud)</td><td>MP</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>Krigsmaterielexport (avslag)</td><td>V</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024094</td><td>Kommunal hälso- och sjukvård (delvis avslag)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024093</td><td>Cybersäkerhetscenter (komplettering)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr><tr><td>HD024089</td><td>Ny mottagandelag (kommunalt stöd)</td><td>C</td><td>mot</td><td>23:38Z</td><td>metadata</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/ — 15 docs incl. vårproposition HD03100</li>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/ — 20 docs incl. HD024082–HD024098</li>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/ — 10 docs incl. HD01FiU48</li>
 <li>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/interpellations/ — 5 docs incl. HD10442–HD10446</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents retrieved from data.riksdagen.se via riksdag-regering MCP server</li>
 <li>Full text not fetched for all documents (metadata-only for most)</li>
 <li>Sibling folder synthesis summaries read for Tier-C cross-reference</li>
 <li>No lookback required — documents confirmed for 2026-04-22</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10443-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10443-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10444-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10444-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10445-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10445-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/documents/HD10446-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10446-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3735,7 +3766,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:09.433Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:30.863Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html b/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html
index df2340dc29..54ab613953 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.610Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.046Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.610Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.046Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion","description":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal package (fuel tax cuts + energy support) and two dormant constitutional amendments (TF/YGL) with significant pre-election…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:09.610Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion","description":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal package (fuel tax cuts + energy support) and two dormant constitutional amendments (TF/YGL) with significant pre-election…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:31.046Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal package (fuel tax cuts + energy support) and two dormant constitutional amendments (TF/YGL) with significant pre-election implications. The fiscal intervention directly lowers household energy costs five months before the September 2026 election, while the constitutional reforms require post-election ratification — creating legal continuity stakes tied to election outcomes. Three housing market transparency measures (property identity requirements and a national bostadsrättsregister) add up to the most significant housing market reform in over a decade.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Support
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Decision</th><th>Supported By</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Electoral strategy assessment</strong>: Does FiU48 benefit the Tidö coalition?</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal analysis + electoral impact model</td><td>MEDIUM [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Constitutional continuity risk</strong>: What happens to KU33/KU32 if government changes post-election?</td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32 vilande status analysis</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>Housing market transparency</strong>: Are CU27/CU28 effective anti-money laundering measures?</td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 combined property reform analysis</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>FISCAL EMERGENCY (HIGH PRIORITY)
 • HD01FiU48: SEK 4.1bn emergency budget → fuel tax −82 öre/L petrol, −319 kr/m³ diesel
 • Period: 1 May–30 Sep 2026 (election campaign window)
@@ -280,11 +280,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 • HD01TU16: Mandatory driving course for övningskörning removed
 </code></pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🚨 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🚨 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch</strong>: How S, V, and MP respond to FiU48 in the Riksdag debate and campaign messaging. If the opposition frames this as fiscal irresponsibility + climate regression, it will define a key election battleground. Monitor Riksbank commentary on inflationary effects of fuel subsidy policy — central bank disagreement would amplify opposition arguments.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-1 Trigger</strong>: Constitutional second vote on KU33/KU32 is required after election — monitor election outcome and post-election coalition formation for continuity risk signal.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-label-summary">Confidence Label Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-label-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-label-summary">Confidence Label Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-label-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-label-summary">Confidence Label Summary<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Area</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal figures (FiU48)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Primary source HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional process (KU33/KU32)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Primary source HD01KU33/KU32 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Property reform (CU27/CU28)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Primary source HD01CU27/CU28 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral impact analysis</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Structural reasoning, known party positions [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election constitutional continuity</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Constitutional law analysis [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>WEP Quick Reference</strong> (Pass 2 improvement — explicit probability anchors):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><em>Almost certain</em> (95%+): Vilande amendments (KU33/KU32) adopted by current Riksdag — procedure is binding</li>
@@ -333,16 +333,16 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty source assessment</strong>: All factual claims [A1] (official Riksdag documents); electoral projection [C3] (structural analyst inference).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis folder</strong>: <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/</code>
 <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23T05:00:00Z
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/synthesis-methodology.md</code> + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>
 <strong>Admiralty overall</strong>: [B2] — Multiple reliable primary sources, information independently corroborated</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift">🎯 Lead Story: Emergency Budget Signals Pre-Election Fiscal Shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift">🎯 Lead Story: Emergency Budget Signals Pre-Election Fiscal Shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift"></a></h3>
 <p>The highest-significance decision in this batch is <strong>HD01FiU48</strong> (Extra ändringsbudget 2026), which represents the Tidö coalition deploying SEK 4.1 billion in emergency fiscal measures — fuel tax cuts and energy support — just five months before the September 2026 election. This is the dominant intelligence picture: a government using constitutional emergency budget procedures for what critics will characterize as election-year fiscal stimulus.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ra
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — drivmedelsskatt + energistöd</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>15/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn — beslag och husrannsakan (TF vilande)</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>13/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart + bostadsrättslagen</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för medier (TF+YGL vilande)</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>11/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01CU22</td><td>Ställföreträdarskap att lita på</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>10/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionen — jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Slopat krav anmälan föräldrapenning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6/15</td><td>L1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Slopat krav introduktionsutbildning körning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6/15</td><td>L1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>D = Decision impact, I = Implementation urgency, W = Political weight</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","secondaryColor":"#2E7D32","secondaryTextColor":"#ffffff","tertiaryColor":"#FF6B35","tertiaryTextColor":"#ffffff","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 mindmap
   root((Committee Reports&#x3C;br/>April 2026))
@@ -505,26 +505,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence
     classDef high fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     classDef medium fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff
     classDef low fill:#616161,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--five-strategic-themes">🔍 Five Strategic Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--five-strategic-themes"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance">1. Pre-Election Fiscal Stimulus (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-five-strategic-themes">🔍 Five Strategic Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-strategic-themes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance">1. Pre-Election Fiscal Stimulus (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>FiU48 is an election-year emergency measure. The government's use of the extraordinary "extra ändringsbudget" mechanism for household energy cost relief signals that energy/fuel prices are perceived as an existential electoral threat. The SEK 4.1bn cost will feature in the autumn campaign — both as evidence of government responsiveness (coalition framing) and as fiscal irresponsibility (opposition framing).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance">2. Constitutional Modernization Before Election (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance">2. Constitutional Modernization Before Election (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>Two TF/YGL amendments adopted as vilande in KU33 and KU32 require the incoming post-September 2026 Riksdag to ratify them. This creates a constitutional continuity dependency: a changed government or altered parliamentary majority could refuse the second vote. The constitutional package — restricting transparency of seized digital materials (KU33) and enabling accessibility obligations for media (KU32) — reflects a delicate balance between law enforcement modernization and fundamental freedoms.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance">3. Housing Market Integrity (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance">3. Housing Market Integrity (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>CU27 and CU28 together form a comprehensive housing market transparency reform: national bostadsrättsregister + identity requirements for property transfers. These address money laundering (CU27), consumer protection (CU28), and credit market efficiency (CU28). Both effective before election, creating tangible visible improvements for the large Swedish bostadsrätt owner constituency.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance">4. Environmental Governance Under Scrutiny (MEDIUM SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance">4. Environmental Governance Under Scrutiny (MEDIUM SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>MJU21 (Riksrevisionen agriculture climate audit) and MJU19 (waste law reform) reflect dual pressures: EU compliance obligations (MJU19) and domestic audit scrutiny of climate policy effectiveness (MJU21). The Riksrevisionen finding on agricultural climate transition could emerge as a campaign issue if the government's rural/farming support bloc conflicts with its climate commitments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals">5. Deregulation and Simplification Micro-signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals">5. Deregulation and Simplification Micro-signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals"></a></h4>
 <p>SfU20 and TU16 are individually minor but together signal the government's administrative deregulation agenda — removing requirements that no longer serve their stated purpose. Pre-election optics: competent, practical governance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">📡 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">📡 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SEO Title</strong> (EN): "Sweden's Riksdag Approves Emergency Fuel Tax Cut and Constitutional Reform Package, April 2026"
 <strong>SEO Title</strong> (SV): "Riksdagen godkänner nödbromsat drivmedelsskatt och grundlagspaket april 2026"
 <strong>Meta Description</strong> (EN): "Sweden's parliament approved emergency fuel tax cuts worth SEK 4.1 billion and three constitutional amendments in April 2026, setting the stage for a pivotal election-year legislative sprint."
 <strong>Keywords</strong>: committee reports, riksdag, fuel tax, constitutional amendment, bostadsrätt, election 2026, FiU48, KU33, Sweden politics</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Overall analysis confidence: HIGH [B2] — Based on official riksdagen.se primary sources for all 10 documents; fiscal figures confirmed from government budget text as summarized; political analysis MEDIUM [C3] based on structural reasoning from known party positions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Source quality</strong>: [A1] Official riksdagen.se API data for all 10 documents — highest evidence grade.
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: PRIMARY = [B2] factual findings; SECONDARY = [C3] electoral interpretations.
 <strong>WEP Assessments</strong>:</p>
@@ -537,30 +537,30 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Key assumptions</strong>: Election remains on constitutional schedule (September 2026); Riksdag quorum maintains throughout legislative session; FiU48 not challenged in court.</p>
 <p><strong>Limitations</strong>: No access to internal party polling, coalition agreement revision documents, or Riksdag committee debate records (anföranden) — these would improve confidence on KJ-1 and KJ-4.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48">Key Judgment KJ-1: The Tidö Coalition Will Gain Short-Term Electoral Benefit from FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48">Key Judgment KJ-1: The Tidö Coalition Will Gain Short-Term Electoral Benefit from FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>MEDIUM confidence</strong> that the emergency fuel tax cut and energy support package (HD01FiU48) will provide measurable short-term electoral benefit to the Tidö coalition, particularly with rural and commuter voters. The timing (1 May–30 Sep 2026, covering the election campaign) is deliberately calibrated. However, fiscal responsiveness may be partially offset by opposition framing of the SEK 4.1bn cost as irresponsible pre-election spending.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01FiU48 [A1] — fiscal figures confirmed; electoral impact MEDIUM [C3] — structural reasoning.
 <em>PIR-1 connection</em>: Monitor opposition response framing in September 2026 election results.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution">Key Judgment KJ-2: The Constitutional Package (KU33, KU32) Represents Genuine Policy Need Plus Election-Year Execution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution">Key Judgment KJ-2: The Constitutional Package (KU33, KU32) Represents Genuine Policy Need Plus Election-Year Execution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>HIGH confidence</strong> that both TF amendments (KU33 digital seizure transparency; KU32 media accessibility) address genuine legal modernization needs, but are advanced on an accelerated timeline driven by election-cycle deadlines. The vilande status creates post-election constitutional continuity risk — particularly for KU33, which may face partisan opposition from an S-led government.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01KU33, HD01KU32 [A1] — constitutional process confirmed.
 <em>PIR-2 connection</em>: Monitor KU composition and coalition formation post-election for second-vote credibility.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor">Key Judgment KJ-3: Sweden's Housing Market Transparency Has a Meaningful Post-CU27/CU28 Improvement Floor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor">Key Judgment KJ-3: Sweden's Housing Market Transparency Has a Meaningful Post-CU27/CU28 Improvement Floor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>HIGH confidence</strong> that the combined CU27 (identity requirements) + CU28 (national register) reforms represent the most significant structural improvement to Swedish bostadsrätt market transparency in over a decade. Money laundering reduction will be partial (see H3 in devils-advocate.md) but the consumer protection and credit market efficiency gains are substantial and cross-party supported.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01CU27, HD01CU28 [A1] — legislative text confirmed.
 <em>PIR-3 connection</em>: Monitor register construction progress (2027 implementation) and any implementation delays.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure">Key Judgment KJ-4: The Government's Environmental Credibility Is Under Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure">Key Judgment KJ-4: The Government's Environmental Credibility Is Under Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>MEDIUM confidence</strong> that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fuel tax cuts (climate-adverse signal) and MJU21 Riksrevisionen criticism of agricultural climate transition support will combine to damage the Tidö coalition's environmental credibility, particularly with C and MP voters. This is partially offset by MJU19 (waste law EU compliance) but not substantially.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01FiU48, HD01MJU21 [A1] — direct policy conflict; electoral impact MEDIUM [C3].
 <em>PIR-5 connection</em>: Monitor party manifestos for climate commitments ahead of election; MJU21 media coverage.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Inte
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Requirement</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1</td><td>What is the opposition's (S) detailed response to FiU48 in Riksdag debate?</td><td>Any S/V/MP official statement on FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2</td><td>What is the likelihood of KU33 second vote post-election based on coalition formation?</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3</td><td>Is CU28 bostadsrättsregister procurement/IT tender issued on schedule?</td><td>Government order post-election for register system</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4</td><td>What are fuel price levels in September–October 2026 when FiU48 subsidy expires?</td><td>Energy market monitoring</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5</td><td>What does MJU21 full Riksrevisionen report recommend vs. government response?</td><td>Full report publication</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -640,12 +640,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Basis</th><th>Robustness</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Election scheduled September 2026</td><td>Constitutional calendar [A1]</td><td>Very High</td></tr><tr><td>Tidö coalition remains stable through summer 2026</td><td>No current coalition crisis signals [B2]</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 requires second vote from new Riksdag</td><td>Constitutional process confirmed [A1]</td><td>Very High</td></tr><tr><td>S opposes KU33 second vote</td><td>Based on historical S FOI positions [B3]</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 fuel subsidy expires as scheduled 30 Sep 2026</td><td>Legislative text confirmed [A1]</td><td>High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-intelligence-confidence">Overall Intelligence Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-intelligence-confidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-intelligence-confidence">Overall Intelligence Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-intelligence-confidence"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH confidence</strong> in factual findings (all 10 documents confirmed from primary sources).
 <strong>MEDIUM confidence</strong> in electoral and political impact predictions.
 <strong>VERY HIGH confidence</strong> in constitutional process analysis (KU33, KU32 vilande mechanics confirmed [A1]).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SAT Technique used</strong>: Key Judgments method per ICD 203; ACH used in devils-advocate.md to stress-test KJ-1.
 <strong>WEP Summary for KJs</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -656,8 +656,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class=
 </ul>
 <p><strong>PIR Standing Review</strong>: All 5 PIRs above feed into the standing PIR framework from osint-tradecraft-standards.md. PIR-1 maps to standing PIR-1 (government stability/electoral intent); PIR-2 maps to standing PIR-2 (legislative agenda continuity); PIR-5 maps to standing PIR-5 (environmental policy implementation).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-criteria">DIW Scoring Criteria<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-criteria"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scoring-criteria">DIW Scoring Criteria<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-criteria"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-criteria">DIW Scoring Criteria<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>5 = Maximum</th><th>1 = Minimum</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>D</strong> — Decision immediacy</td><td>Immediate, irreversible</td><td>Gradual, reversible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I</strong> — Implementation impact</td><td>National systemic, 1M+ affected</td><td>Local/administrative, &#x3C;1000 affected</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong> — Political weight</td><td>Government-opposition divide, election-defining</td><td>Procedural/bipartisan, no controversy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-scoring-table">Ranked Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-scoring-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-scoring-table">Ranked Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-scoring-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -801,23 +801,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-scoring-table">Ranked Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW</th><th>Tier</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget drivmedelsskatt + energistöd</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01KU33 — TF vilande: insyn beslag husrannsakan</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>13</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01CU27 — Identitetskrav lagfart + bostadsrättslagen</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU28 — Nationellt bostadsrättsregister</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01KU32 — TF+YGL vilande: tillgänglighetskrav medier</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>11</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01CU22 — Ställföreträdarskap: gode man/förvaltare reform</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>10</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionen jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU19 — Avfallslagstiftning materialåtervinning</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01SfU20 — Slopat anmälningskrav föräldrapenning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>L1</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01TU16 — Slopat krav introduktionsutbildning körning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>L1</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-rank-diagram">📊 Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-rank-diagram">📊 Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Scores — Committee Reports April 2026"
     x-axis ["HD01FiU48", "HD01KU33", "HD01CU27", "HD01CU28", "HD01KU32", "HD01CU22", "HD01MJU21", "HD01MJU19", "HD01SfU20", "HD01TU16"]
     y-axis "DIW Score (max 15)" 0 --> 15
     bar [15, 13, 12, 12, 11, 10, 9, 9, 6, 6]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>What if FiU48 fiscal impact is larger?</strong> The SEK 4.1bn figure is confirmed from primary source. Even conservative scenarios place the fiscal signal at L2+ — the emergency budget mechanism use alone justifies the highest political weight score regardless of exact amounts.</p>
 <p><strong>What if KU33/KU32 second vote is refused post-election?</strong> The constitutional implications escalate to L3 Intelligence-grade if there is a government change and these amendments are blocked — monitor post-election coalition formation.</p>
 <p><strong>What if CU27/CU28 encounter implementation difficulties?</strong> Register construction for bostadsrätter has been debated for years; the 2027 implementation date gives government time — but delays could become a campaign liability.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology-notes">Scoring Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology-notes">Scoring Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>DIW weights applied per <code>synthesis-methodology.md</code> Part 1. All documents confirmed via riksdagen.se primary source [A1] — Admiralty source reliability: A (completely reliable). All dok_ids verified via MCP API response at 2026-04-23T04:45Z.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue">Predicted Editorial Frames by Issue<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy">HD01FiU48 — Emergency Budget (Fuel / Energy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue">Predicted Editorial Frames by Issue<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy">HD01FiU48 — Emergency Budget (Fuel / Energy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy">HD01FiU48 — Emergency Bud
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Medium type</th><th>Likely primary frame</th><th>Likely secondary frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tabloid (Aftonbladet, Expressen)</td><td>"Folkparti för bilismens vänner" / "Billigare bensin" headline</td><td>Cost-of-living relief; consumer wins</td></tr><tr><td>Broadsheet (DN, SvD)</td><td>Fiscal policy analysis; climate tradeoff question</td><td>Election timing critique</td></tr><tr><td>Local/regional (NT, GP, Sydsvenskan)</td><td>Rural beneficiary stories; local household quotes</td><td>Environmental opposition quotes</td></tr><tr><td>SVT/SR news</td><td>Balance: coalition claim + S/MP response</td><td>Economic expert analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Pro-coalition media (Epoch Times, Nyheter Idag)</td><td>"Government delivers for ordinary Swedes"</td><td>Opposition hypocrisy framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net frame prediction</strong>: Dual-track coverage — economic relief story dominant (reaches ~65% of audience); environmental cost story secondary (~35% of audience). Coalition net benefit: positive, especially among targeted rural/suburban demographic.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Ame
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Medium type</th><th>Likely frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Broadsheet</td><td>Process story: procedural milestone; second-vote timeline</td></tr><tr><td>Tabloid</td><td>Very limited coverage unless opposition declares major resistance</td></tr><tr><td>Academic/political blogs</td><td>FOI implications; digital access; press freedom angle</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag press services</td><td>Neutral procedural reporting</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net frame</strong>: Low salience in mainstream media; high salience in policy/press-freedom community. Does not benefit or hurt coalition significantly in voter terms.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime">CU27/CU28 — Property / Housing Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime">CU27/CU28 — Property / Housing Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime">CU27/CU28 — Property / Hous
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Medium type</th><th>Likely frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tabloid</td><td>Crime-in-housing story; gang infiltration of bostadsrätter</td></tr><tr><td>Broadsheet</td><td>AML policy; transparency; housing market stability</td></tr><tr><td>Housing industry media</td><td>Technical compliance; registry burden on bostadsrättsföreningar</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net frame</strong>: Crime-reduction narrative resonates with SD/M base. Industry concerns provide opposition angle.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-disinformation-risk-assessment">Disinformation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-disinformation-risk-assessment">Disinformation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -934,11 +934,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-disinformation-risk-assessment">Disinformation Risk Assessment<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk vector</th><th>Probability</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 misrepresented as permanent subsidy</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Legislation clearly time-limited; fact-check resources available</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 framed as "press censorship"</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>Text clearly expands access; however "vilande" process creates uncertainty window</td></tr><tr><td>CU28 registry framed as "surveillance register"</td><td>LOW</td><td>Register is existing-owner-only; accuracy may reduce concerns</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Media framing is predictive analysis [C3] based on pattern recognition from past Swedish legislative coverage. Actual media response depends on editorial decisions not observable in advance. Confidence: LOW [C4].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Interest</th><th>Power</th><th>Impact</th><th>Position</th><th>Named Actor</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>High — drives all legislation</td><td>High — government majority</td><td>Positive FiU48, CU27/28</td><td>Supportive</td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>High — main opposition</td><td>Medium in current session</td><td>Contested FiU48, supportive CU27/28</td><td>Critical on energy subsidies</td><td>Opposition Leader Magdalena Andersson</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>High — coalition partner, rural voter base benefits from fuel tax cut</td><td>High</td><td>Strongly positive FiU48</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Party leader Jimmie Åkesson</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>High — senior coalition</td><td>High</td><td>Positive housing market reforms</td><td>Supportive</td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>High — fiscal critique</td><td>Low</td><td>Critical FiU48</td><td>Opposed</td><td>Party leader Nooshi Dadgostar</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>High — climate critique</td><td>Low</td><td>Strongly opposed FiU48 fuel cuts</td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Party leader Märta Stenevi</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>High — climate + fiscal + rural tension</td><td>Low (outside coalition)</td><td>Mixed: supports rural relief, opposes climate regression</td><td>Ambivalent</td><td>Party leader Muharrem Demirok</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>High — social welfare (CU22)</td><td>Medium</td><td>Positive CU22, CU28</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Party leader Ebba Busch</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank</td><td>Medium — inflation monitoring</td><td>High (independent)</td><td>Concern about FiU48 inflation risk</td><td>Watching</td><td>Governor Erik Thedéen</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Polisen / Åklagarmyndigheten</td><td>Medium — KU33 digital seizures</td><td>Low direct</td><td>Positive KU33</td><td>Supportive</td><td>National Police Commissioner Petra Lundh</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Housing associations (bostadsrättsföreningar)</td><td>Medium — CU28 register burden</td><td>Medium (industry)</td><td>Transition cost; long-term positive</td><td>Mixed</td><td>HSB, Riksbyggen, SBC</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Disability organizations (NGOs)</td><td>High — CU22, KU32 accessibility</td><td>Medium (advocacy)</td><td>Positive CU22, KU32</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Handikappförbunden, DHR</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Journalists / Civil society</td><td>High — KU33 transparency concern</td><td>Medium (public opinion)</td><td>Negative KU33</td><td>Concerned</td><td>Swedish Press Photographers' Association, JO</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>Farming sector (LRF)</td><td>High — FiU48 diesel cuts; MJU21 climate critique</td><td>Medium</td><td>Mixed: fuel relief positive; climate audit negative</td><td>Ambivalent</td><td>LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Car-dependent households (rural, commuter)</td><td>High — direct FiU48 beneficiaries</td><td>Electoral</td><td>Positive</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Structural — no named actor</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     GOV["Tidö Government&#x3C;br/>Kristersson (M)"]
@@ -1125,11 +1125,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style POLL fill:#37474F,color:#fff
     style NGO fill:#4A148C,color:#fff
     style MEDIA fill:#F57F17,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-neutrality-audit">Neutrality Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-neutrality-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-neutrality-audit">Neutrality Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-neutrality-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>Analysis covers 8 parties + institutional actors. No party systematically advantaged in framing. Positive and negative assessments applied based on primary source evidence [A1] and structural reasoning [B3], not editorial preference. All named actors hold public positions making their views a matter of public record per GDPR Art. 9(2)(e).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon">72-Hour Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-horizon">72-Hour Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon">72-Hour Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-01: FiU48 Riksdag vote</td><td>2026-04-24</td><td>Vote count, party positions</td><td>Confirms coalition unity</td></tr><tr><td>I-02: KU33 Riksdag vote</td><td>2026-04-24</td><td>Vilande adoption formal</td><td>Constitutional process confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>I-03: KU32 Riksdag vote</td><td>2026-04-24</td><td>Vilande adoption formal</td><td>Constitutional process confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>I-04: Party press releases</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>S, V, MP framing of FiU48</td><td>Measures opposition effectiveness</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon">One-Week Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-week-horizon">One-Week Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon">One-Week Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-05: Media polling reaction</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Novus/Demoskop poll shift</td><td>Energy policy salience</td></tr><tr><td>I-06: Industry response CU28</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HSB/Riksbyggen statement</td><td>Registry implementation resistance signal</td></tr><tr><td>I-07: IVO comment on CU22</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>IVO press release</td><td>Supervisory reform signal</td></tr><tr><td>I-08: Riksdag committee follow-up</td><td>2026-04-30</td><td>CU/KU post-decision notes</td><td>Any reconsideration signals</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon">One-Month Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-month-horizon">One-Month Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon">One-Month Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-09: Government proposition on CU22</td><td>2026-05-20</td><td>Government bill for new authority</td><td>Implementation commitment</td></tr><tr><td>I-10: Lantmäteriet CU28 consultation</td><td>2026-05-15</td><td>Lantmäteriet public consultation</td><td>Registry timeline</td></tr><tr><td>I-11: Opposition manifesto energy</td><td>2026-05-01</td><td>S/V/MP climate manifesto</td><td>Counter-narrative strength</td></tr><tr><td>I-12: Riksbank inflation report</td><td>2026-05-15</td><td>Rate decision + forecast</td><td>Coalition economic context</td></tr><tr><td>I-13: SCB housing price data</td><td>2026-05-06</td><td>Swedish housing market indicators</td><td>CU27/CU28 implementation environment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-cycle-horizon">Election-Cycle Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-cycle-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-cycle-horizon">Election-Cycle Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-cycle-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1295,10 +1295,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-cycle-horizon">Election-Cycle Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-14: Party manifestos published</td><td>2026-07-01</td><td>Constitutional commitment language</td><td>KU33/KU32 second vote commitment</td></tr><tr><td>I-15: Election result Sept 2026</td><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Seat distribution</td><td>Constitutional amendment fate</td></tr><tr><td>I-16: Post-election KU33/KU32 second vote</td><td>2026-11-01</td><td>New Riksdag decision</td><td>Constitutional outcome</td></tr><tr><td>I-17: CU28 registry launched</td><td>2027-06-01</td><td>Lantmäteriet public registry live</td><td>Implementation completion</td></tr><tr><td>I-18: CU22 new authority established</td><td>2027-01-01</td><td>Authority operational</td><td>Guardianship reform completion</td></tr><tr><td>I-19: FiU48 renewable energy investment outcome</td><td>2026-12-31</td><td>Government progress report</td><td>Policy effectiveness</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-note">Confidence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-note">Confidence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-note"></a></h3>
 <p>Indicator dates are derived from legislative timelines stated in KU33/KU32 documentation [A1], government procedural norms [B2], and standard Swedish legislative cycles [B3]. Election date 2026-09-13 is the statutory election Sunday [A1].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Key milestones matrix</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -1333,11 +1333,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Horizon</th><th>Most critical indicator</th><th>Monitoring method</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>72h</td><td>I-01: FiU48 vote 2026-04-24</td><td>riksdagen.se voteringer API</td></tr><tr><td>1 week</td><td>I-05: Polling reaction 2026-04-28</td><td>Novus/Demoskop public releases</td></tr><tr><td>1 month</td><td>I-12: Riksbank 2026-05-15</td><td>riksbank.se</td></tr><tr><td>Election</td><td>I-15: Election result 2026-09-13</td><td>valmyndigheten.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Collection gap</strong>: No automated trigger monitoring available in current system — all indicators require manual collection. Recommend Agentic Workflow realtime-monitor to watch riksdagen.se for I-01, I-02, I-03 votes.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Three scenarios for how April 2026 committee report decisions shape the Swedish political and legal landscape through election and beyond.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35">Scenario 1 — Continuity: Tidö Re-elected, Full Constitutional Package Confirmed (35%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35">Scenario 1 — Continuity: Tidö Re-elected, Full Constitutional Package Confirmed (35%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The Tidö coalition wins re-election in September 2026. In the autumn session, the new Riksdag passes the second vote on KU33 and KU32. Both TF/YGL amendments enter into force on 1 January 2027. The bostadsrättsregister (CU28) launches on schedule. Fuel prices stabilize as Middle East tensions ease and the temporary fuel tax subsidy expires 30 September 2026 without cliff-edge shock.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Polls showing Alliansen-SD coalition above 50% by August 2026.
 <strong>Signal</strong>: KU committee announcing second-vote scheduling for autumn 2026 session.</p>
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-c
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence basis</strong>: HD01FiU48, HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD01CU28 [A1]; electoral scenarios [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45">Scenario 2 — Partial Disruption: Government Change, Constitutional Package Blocked (45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45">Scenario 2 — Partial Disruption: Government Change, Constitutional Package Blocked (45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Social Democrats form government with V support after September 2026 election. New KU committee is constituted with different chairperson. The second vote on KU33 is refused or delayed (S traditionally more protective of offentlighetsprincipen). KU32 (accessibility, EU-driven) likely passes regardless. FiU48 energy support creates a cliff-edge debate — S campaign to make energy support permanent vs. Riksbank warning on inflation. CU28 bostadsrättsregister proceeds (cross-party support).</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: S polling above 30% with credible V/MP support by July 2026.
 <strong>Signal</strong>: S/V joint statement opposing KU33 second vote as transparency regression.</p>
@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-packa
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence basis</strong>: HD01KU33, HD01KU32 [A1]; electoral analysis [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20">Scenario 3 — Cliff-Edge Energy Crisis: Fuel Tax Subsidy Expiry Shock (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20">Scenario 3 — Cliff-Edge Energy Crisis: Fuel Tax Subsidy Expiry Shock (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The FiU48 temporary fuel tax cut expires 30 September 2026, coinciding with autumn heating season. If geopolitical factors maintain high energy prices, households face a sudden price jump precisely as election results are being processed and coalition negotiations begin. This creates a political crisis: whoever forms government faces immediate pressure to extend the subsidy (fiscal cost: ~SEK 1.5bn per period), while Riksbank and fiscal hawks argue against.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Energy futures contracts for Q4 2026 showing elevated prices; Middle East conflict escalation signals.
 <strong>Signal</strong>: Riksbank public statement on energy price inflation risk in Sweden; opposition party motions demanding permanent fuel tax cuts.</p>
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence basis</strong>: HD01FiU48 [A1] (subsidy period 1 May–30 Sep 2026); energy market structural analysis [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-probability-summary">Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-probability-summary">Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1407,8 +1407,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-probability-summary">Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Probability</th><th>Sum</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 — Continuity, full package</td><td>35%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S2 — Partial disruption, KU33 blocked</td><td>45%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S3 — Energy cliff-edge crisis</td><td>20%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>100%</strong></td><td>✓</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Dimension</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th><th>Cascade</th><th>Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>Fuel subsidy fuels inflation; Riksbank forced to hold/raise rates longer</td><td>Fiscal-monetary</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>→ R2, R4</td><td>Likely [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>FiU48 fiscal expansion tested against EU fiscal rules (Stability &#x26; Growth Pact)</td><td>EU compliance</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>→ R5</td><td>Unlikely [C4]</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>KU33 second vote refused post-election — TF amendment dies</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>→ R6</td><td>Roughly even [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Opposition frames FiU48 as fiscal irresponsibility; swing voters defect</td><td>Electoral</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>→ R7</td><td>Likely [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>CU28 bostadsrättsregister implementation delayed post-2027</td><td>Administrative</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>isolated</td><td>Unlikely [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>Constitutional package collapse creates legal vacuum for digital investigations</td><td>Legal</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>isolated</td><td>Roughly even [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Climate-minded voters (C, MP support) defect due to FiU48 fuel subsidy</td><td>Electoral</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>→ R1</td><td>Likely [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Riksrevisionen MJU21 critique amplified into government negligence narrative</td><td>Reputational</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>→ R4</td><td>Roughly even [B3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-55-li-matrix">5×5 L×I Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-li-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-55-li-matrix">5×5 L×I Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-li-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Likelihood × Impact (Committee Reports April 2026)
@@ -1523,7 +1523,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-55-li-matrix">5×5 L×I Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
     R8 - Riksrevisionen narrative: [0.35, 0.5]
     R2 - EU fiscal rules: [0.5, 0.35]
     R5 - Register delay: [0.3, 0.3]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary chain</strong>: R1 (inflation) → R4 (electoral framing) → R7 (climate voter defection)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>FiU48 fuel tax cut risks Riksbank concern → triggers S/MP criticism → splits rural vs. urban/educated voter coalitions</li>
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Practical impact: Polisen/Åklagarmyndigheten face legal uncertainty in major digital seizure cases</li>
 <li>Severity: MEDIUM — operational legal issue, not a political crisis</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1566,12 +1566,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Prior</th><th>Conditional update</th><th>Posterior</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksbank publicly critiques FiU48 on inflation</td><td>20%</td><td>+15% if energy prices rise May–June 2026</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 second vote passes post-election</td><td>60%</td><td>+20% if Tidö coalition wins; −40% if S wins</td><td>20–80% range</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition fiscal framing dominates campaign</td><td>40%</td><td>+20% if public polling shows household debt rising</td><td>60%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sources">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sources">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources"></a></h3>
 <p>All risk assessments grounded in: HD01FiU48 [A1] (fiscal data); HD01KU33 [A1] (constitutional process); HD01MJU21 [A1] (climate audit); Structural analysis [B3] for electoral impacts.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Responsive fiscal governance</strong>: HD01FiU48 demonstrates Tidö coalition's ability to deploy emergency tools to protect households from energy price shocks; politically effective pre-election signal [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Housing market modernization</strong>: CU27+CU28 close significant anti-money laundering and consumer protection gaps in the Swedish property market, building on Tidö's stated agenda to combat organized crime [HD01CU27, HD01CU28, riksdagen.se]</li>
@@ -1579,28 +1579,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <li><strong>CRPD alignment</strong>: CU22 (ställföreträdarskap reform) demonstrates Sweden's commitment to CRPD obligations, improving trust among disability rights advocates [HD01CU22, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Deregulation signals</strong>: SfU20, TU16 exemplify practical removal of ineffective administrative burdens — demonstrates competent, evidence-based governance [HD01SfU20, HD01TU16, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fiscal credibility risk</strong>: FiU48's SEK 4.1bn budget weakening in an election year may undermine the coalition's credibility on fiscal discipline — a key differentiator from S-led alternatives [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se; fiscal risk based on structural analysis B3]</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional second-vote dependency</strong>: KU33/KU32 remain dormant until post-election second vote — the legislation is constitutionally fragile and dependent on political continuity; any government change could undo both [HD01KU33, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Agricultural climate transition failure</strong>: MJU21 Riksrevisionen audit signals inadequate state support for agriculture's climate shift — a weakness in the government's environmental credibility, especially with C and MP voters [HD01MJU21, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Bostadsrättsregister implementation risk</strong>: CU28's register construction begins 1 January 2027 — post-election; implementation complications would become next government's problem and a campaign accountability issue [HD01CU28, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Election-year tangible delivery</strong>: Seven out of ten measures take effect before or near the September 2026 election — unprecedented wave of tangible legislative delivery creates voter perception of a productive government [HD01FiU48, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD01MJU19, HD01SfU20, HD01TU16, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Housing market anti-crime narrative</strong>: CU27's identity/lagfart requirements and bostadsrättsombildning rules play directly into the government's core crime-fighting narrative, popular across partisan divides [HD01CU27, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Digital state modernization</strong>: The constitutional framework changes (KU33, KU32) and the planned e-legitimation (HD01TU21 — not yet adopted) together build a modern digital Sweden narrative [HD01KU33, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Nordic/EU alignment</strong>: MJU19 waste law reform, KU32 accessibility requirements align Sweden with EU policy mainstreams — reduces isolation risk and demonstrates international responsibility [HD01MJU19, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Opposition fiscal attack surface</strong>: S, V, MP will use FiU48's SEK 4.1bn cost as evidence of irresponsible pre-election spending; Riksbank could provide implicit support for this critique if it comments on inflationary risk [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se; electoral analysis B3]</li>
 <li><strong>Climate backlash on fuel tax cuts</strong>: The drivmedelsskatt cut (FiU48) directly contradicts climate-science consensus on carbon pricing; environmental movement and MP/C will make this a campaign issue; potential EU scrutiny if cuts undercut energy taxation directive minimum levels [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional overreach perception</strong>: KU33's restriction of offentlighetsprincipen in criminal investigations could be framed as erosion of transparency — historically a sensitive issue in Sweden [HD01KU33, riksdagen.se; civil society analysis C3]</li>
 <li><strong>Riksrevisionen agriculture critique</strong>: If MJU21 report receives wide media coverage, it feeds an election narrative of Tidö coalition sacrificing long-term climate goals for short-term rural constituency appeasement [HD01MJU21, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1622,12 +1622,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td>S-O: Use responsive fiscal governance + housing market delivery as election campaign centrepieces; lead with crime-fighting + household economics narrative</td><td>S-T: Proactively communicate climate transition support via agriculture programs to pre-empt Riksrevisionen criticism; brief Riksbank on FiU48 temporary nature</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td>W-O: Frame CU28 register as phased delivery — first vote wins before election, full implementation follows</td><td>W-T: Address constitutional fragility of KU33/KU32 by seeking cross-party commitments on second vote; reduce exposure if broad support confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h3>
 <p>The most important interference: <strong>FiU48 (Strength: fiscal responsiveness) × MJU21 (Weakness: agriculture climate failure)</strong> — both relate to energy and agriculture. If voters simultaneously receive fuel tax relief AND hear Riksrevisionen criticism of agricultural climate transition support, cognitive dissonance may weaken both messages. The government needs to separate these narratives temporally.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty evidence annotation</strong>: All primary evidence rows cite <code>dok_id</code> from riksdagen.se [A1]. Interpretive rows annotated [B3] or [C3] where inferential.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Taxonomy</th><th>Severity</th><th>Actor</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1: Pre-election fiscal populism erodes budget credibility</td><td>Policy coherence threat</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Government</td><td>HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T2: Constitutional package (KU33/KU32) loses post-election ratification</td><td>Institutional continuity threat</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Parliament</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T3: Offentlighetsprincipen restriction (KU33) challenged by civil society</td><td>Democratic legitimacy threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Civil society, journalists</td><td>HD01KU33 [A1], [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>T4: Money laundering via property market persists despite CU27/CU28</td><td>Crime/organized crime threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Criminal actors</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T5: Agricultural climate transition fails — Sweden misses EU targets</td><td>Environmental governance threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Government, farming lobby</td><td>HD01MJU21 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T6: Energy price volatility recurs after fuel subsidy period ends (1 Oct 2026)</td><td>Economic stability threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Energy markets</td><td>HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism">Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fiscal Populism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism">Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fiscal Populism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#C62828","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#7F0000","lineColor":"#EF9A9A","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     ROOT["T1: Pre-election fiscal expansion undermines budget credibility HD01FiU48"]
@@ -1704,7 +1704,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism">Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fi
     style C fill:#E53935,color:#fff
     style D fill:#FF7043,color:#fff
     style E fill:#1565C0,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ttp-analysis-political">TTP Analysis (Political)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ttp-analysis-political"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ttp-analysis-political">TTP Analysis (Political)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ttp-analysis-political"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1741,25 +1741,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-ttp-analysis-political">TTP Analysis (Political)<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Technique</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TTP-01</td><td>Pre-election emergency budget use</td><td>Maximize electoral benefit</td><td>SEK 4.1bn fiscal expansion [HD01FiU48]</td></tr><tr><td>TTP-02</td><td>Vilande grundlagsandring adoption</td><td>Bind incoming parliament</td><td>Post-election lock-in or block [HD01KU33]</td></tr><tr><td>TTP-03</td><td>Residency requirement for ombildning</td><td>Prevent conversion manipulation</td><td>Tenant protection/enforcement [HD01CU27]</td></tr><tr><td>TTP-04</td><td>Digital seizure non-classification</td><td>Protect investigations from FOI</td><td>Reduced transparency [HD01KU33]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario">Post-Election Constitutional Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario">Post-Election Constitutional Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario"></a></h3>
 <p>If S forms government in October 2026, the second vote on KU33 (TF) may be refused:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Law enforcement digital investigation framework reverts to pre-2026 uncertainty</li>
 <li>Civil society may paradoxically benefit from transparency perspective</li>
 <li>Tidoe coalition would criticize S for weakening crime-fighting capabilities</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sources-1">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sources-1">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <p>All threat assessments grounded in primary documents: HD01FiU48 [A1], HD01KU33 [A1], HD01KU32 [A1], HD01CU27 [A1], HD01MJU21 [A1]. Electoral/political analysis [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu22">HD01CU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01CU22
 <strong>Title</strong>: Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — Major legal guardianship reform affecting vulnerable adults
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved a comprehensive reform of the Swedish ställföreträdarskap (legal guardianship/administratorship) system:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Clearer mandate boundaries for gode män (advisors) and förvaltare (administrators)</li>
@@ -1768,19 +1768,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>National ställföreträdarregister (register) for all appointed representatives</li>
 <li>Most changes: 1 July 2026; register: 1 January 2028</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters"></a></h3>
 <p>The ställföreträdarskap system affects ~100,000+ adults in Sweden who lack legal capacity to fully manage their own affairs (due to cognitive impairment, mental illness, or age-related incapacity). The existing system has faced criticism for quality inconsistency, lack of oversight, and inadequate protection of individuals' autonomy rights. This reform addresses Sweden's obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which Sweden ratified.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01CU22</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU22, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU22">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU22</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27">HD01CU27<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01CU27
 <strong>Title</strong>: Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Housing market integrity, anti-crime, property ownership transparency
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1807,7 +1807,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Lagstiftningsärende</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Property law, anti-money laundering, housing market</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Approved (Riksdagen sa ja)</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>New property transfer identity rules: 1 July 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-1">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-1">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Two distinct legislative packages approved:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>
@@ -1817,40 +1817,40 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-1">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Bostadsrättslagen anti-circumvention</strong>: When a housing association converts rental apartments to bostadsrätter, the tenant must have been registered at the address for ≥6 months before the vote to count in the required 2/3 majority threshold. Prevents rapid turnover of residents to facilitate conversions without genuine tenant approval.</p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-1">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-1">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This reform addresses two distinct but related housing market integrity problems. The identity requirements close an anti-money laundering gap — anonymous property ownership has enabled organized crime asset placement. The 6-month residency requirement for bostadsrättsombildning prevents "straw tenant" schemes where landlords rapidly populate a building with compliant tenants to achieve the 2/3 conversion majority.</p>
 <p>Both measures are politically popular across party lines as anti-crime measures that also protect tenants. They become law on 1 July 2026 — well before the election.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01CU27</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU27, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU27">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU27</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu28">HD01CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01CU28
 <strong>Title</strong>: Ett register för alla bostadsrätter
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Major housing market infrastructure reform
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-2">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-2">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved creation of a national register for all bostadsrätter (condominium apartments):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Records: apartment details, bostadsrättshavare (title holder), bostadsrättsförening (association), pantsättningar (mortgages/pledges)</li>
 <li>Purpose: Central registry replacing fragmented association records; modern pledging system (registration replaces association notification)</li>
 <li>Timeline: Register construction rules from 1 January 2027; remainder from date set by government</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-2">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-2">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden currently lacks a national register for bostadsrätter — a major gap compared to the fastighetsregister for ordinary real property. This reform modernizes the bostadsrätt market, improves consumer protection, and creates transparent credit information for banks and buyers. The pledge registration shift (away from notifying the association) eliminates a significant legal uncertainty that has caused disputes.</p>
 <p><strong>Election-year timing</strong>: Strong cross-party support expected. Housing market transparency is popular among the large proportion of Swedish households (approx. 750,000+ bostadsrätter nationwide) that own or aspire to own bostadsrätter.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01CU28</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU28, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01FiU48
 <strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Fiscal policy with immediate household impact and election-year political salience
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen primary source, confirmed via API</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-1">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-1">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-1">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (Emergency supplementary budget)</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Fiscal policy, energy taxation, household welfare</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional status</td><td>Ordinary law (not grundlag)</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Approved (Riksdagen sa ja)</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>Fuel tax: 1 May–30 September 2026; Energy support: covers January–February 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal impact</td><td>−SEK 1.56 bn (revenue loss) + SEK 2.4 bn (new expenditure) = SEK 4.1 bn total fiscal weakening</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-3">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-3">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved the government's (Tidö coalition) proposal for an emergency supplementary budget 2026 comprising two fiscal measures:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>
@@ -1896,10 +1896,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-3">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 </li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Justification cited by government</strong>: Middle East conflict impact on fuel prices; high electricity/gas prices during harsh January–February 2026 winter.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-3">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-3">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-3"></a></h3>
 <p>This is a politically significant fiscal intervention just five months before the scheduled September 2026 election. The Tidö coalition (M, SD, KD, L) used the emergency budget mechanism — ordinarily reserved for exceptional circumstances — to deliver direct household price relief. <strong>The timing is strategic</strong>: lower fuel prices and energy support will be visible to voters during the election campaign period.</p>
 <p><strong>Fiscal risk signal</strong>: Weakening the budget balance by SEK 4.1 bn in an election year under existing fiscal constraints will strengthen opposition (S, V, MP) arguments about irresponsible pre-election spending. The Centre Party (C), outside the coalition, has historically opposed fuel tax reductions on climate grounds.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-a1">Stakeholder Impact [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-a1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-a1">Stakeholder Impact [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-a1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1951,27 +1951,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-a1">Stakeholder Impact [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Impact</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Households with cars (petrol/diesel users)</td><td>Positive — lower fuel costs from 1 May 2026</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Households: electricity/gas users Jan–Feb 2026</td><td>Positive — retroactive support payment</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Tidö coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>Positive electoral boost — visible pre-election relief</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>Contested — S has supported energy support but opposed structural fuel tax cuts</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Centre Party (C)</td><td>Negative alignment — C climate policy opposes fuel tax reductions</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>Strongly opposed on climate grounds</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>State finances</td><td>Negative — SEK 4.1 bn weakening of financial sparande 2026</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Transport sector (haulage, agriculture)</td><td>Positive — diesel reduction significant for commercial operations</td><td>MEDIUM [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-connection-2026">Electoral Connection (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-connection-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-connection-2026">Electoral Connection (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-connection-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>This measure will dominate for the next five months of election campaign. Fuel prices are a high-salience kitchen-table issue, especially in rural and suburban Sweden where car dependency is high. The SD party, whose voters over-index in rural areas and among manual workers, gains particular electoral benefit. This is a pre-election fiscal stimulus that risks inflationary pressure and clashes with Riksbank's continued tight monetary stance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-a1">Confidence Assessment [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-a1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-a1">Confidence Assessment [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-a1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Decision approved: VERY HIGH confidence — confirmed via riksdagen.se</li>
 <li>Fiscal figures SEK 1.56bn + SEK 2.4bn: VERY HIGH — from government budget proposition text as summarized</li>
 <li>Electoral impact analysis: MEDIUM — based on public polling trends, structural analysis</li>
 <li>Opposition response: MEDIUM — based on known party positions, not direct quote from this debate</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-source-chain">Source Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-chain">Source Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-chain"></a></h3>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01FiU48</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:FiU48, datum 2026-04-21 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01KU32
 <strong>Title</strong>: Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — Constitutional amendment enabling EU accessibility compliance for media/digital products
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-2">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-2">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-2">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Vilande grundlagsändring (TF + YGL)</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Constitutional law, media freedom, disability accessibility, EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional status</td><td>TF + Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL) amendments — FIRST of two required votes</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Adopted as vilande</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>1 January 2027 (contingent on post-election second vote)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-4">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-4">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen adopted (as vilande) amendments to both Tryckfrihetsförordningen and Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen enabling accessibility requirements to be imposed on constitutionally protected media products:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Expands scope for product information requirements on packaging and labelling</li>
@@ -2010,19 +2010,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-4">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Allows carriage obligations for accessibility services (captioning, interpretation) from non-public-service broadcasters</li>
 <li>Purpose: Disability accessibility compliance + EU membership obligations</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-4">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-4">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's constitutional press/speech freedoms have historically created tensions with EU digital single market legislation. This amendment resolves a key legal gap by allowing ordinary law to require accessibility features even on constitutionally protected products. The political debate balances disability rights advocates (supportive) against media freedom purists (cautious). This is also required by EU law — delay could create infringement proceedings.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01KU32</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:KU32, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01KU33
 <strong>Title</strong>: Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Constitutional law, fundamental rights (offentlighetsprincipen vs. criminal investigation effectiveness)
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-3">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-3">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-3">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Vilande grundlagsändring (Dormant constitutional amendment — TF)</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Constitutional law, freedom of information (offentlighetsprincipen), criminal investigation powers</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional status</td><td>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) amendment — FIRST of two required votes</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Adopted as vilande (Riksdagen sa ja till att som vilande anta)</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>1 January 2027 (contingent on second vote after 2026 election)</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal impact</td><td>None direct</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-5">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-5">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen adopted (as vilande/dormant) a government proposal amending Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) to restrict public access to digital materials seized or copied during police searches (husrannsakan). Under the proposed rule:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Digital recordings seized/copied in criminal investigations will <strong>not</strong> be classified as public documents (allmänna handlingar)</li>
@@ -2065,11 +2065,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-5">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Exception maintained: if the material is later incorporated into a criminal investigation file, it regains public document status</li>
 <li>Since this is a grundlagsändring (constitutional amendment), it requires TWO identical Riksdag votes with a Riksdag election between them — this April 2026 vote is the FIRST; the second must come after the September 2026 election</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-5">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-5">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional significance</strong>: TF amendments are among the most significant legislative acts possible in Sweden. The offentlighetsprincipen (principle of public access) is a cornerstone of Swedish democracy, dating to 1766. Restricting access — even temporarily during criminal investigations — is a major policy choice requiring extraordinary process.</p>
 <p><strong>Crime-fighting vs. transparency trade-off</strong>: The government justification emphasizes effectiveness of criminal investigations and digital privacy of third parties caught in searches. Critics may argue this weakens accountability transparency for individuals whose data was seized but who were not charged.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-election lock-in</strong>: The dormant adoption means the incoming Riksdag after September 2026 must confirm this change. If the political balance shifts (e.g., if S forms government), the second vote could be refused — effectively killing the amendment. This creates electoral stakes around constitutional law.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Impact</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Law enforcement (Polisen, Åklagarmyndigheten)</td><td>Positive — clearer legal footing for digital seizures</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal suspects/third parties</td><td>Mixed — digital privacy protected but transparency reduced</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Journalists/civil society</td><td>Concern — reduced offentlighet in investigative phase</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Government (Tidö coalition)</td><td>Supports — framed as crime-fighting measure</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election Riksdag</td><td>Critical actor — must adopt second vote to make permanent</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Decision adopted as vilande: VERY HIGH [A1]</li>
 <li>Implementation contingent on post-election second vote: VERY HIGH [A1]</li>
@@ -2115,14 +2115,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01KU33</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:KU33, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01mju19">HD01MJU19<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju19"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01MJU19
 <strong>Title</strong>: Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Miljö- och jordbruksutskottet (MJU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-16
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — EU circular economy compliance, waste legislation reform
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-6">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-6">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved amendments to multiple environmental laws to reduce waste and increase material recycling:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Clearer rules on waste responsibility (when it begins, when it ends)</li>
@@ -2131,12 +2131,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-6">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Removal of requirement for state/municipal entities to post financial security for landfill operations</li>
 <li>Entry into force: 1 July 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-6">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-6">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-6"></a></h3>
 <p>This reform implements EU waste framework directive obligations and contributes to Sweden's circular economy transition. The removal of state/municipal financial security requirements is a practical simplification. Clearer waste responsibility rules reduce legal uncertainty for businesses and municipalities. The timing with 1 July 2026 implementation aligns with broader pre-election regulatory modernization.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01MJU19</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:MJU19, datum 2026-04-16 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU19">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU19</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21">HD01MJU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01MJU21
 <strong>Title</strong>: Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser för jordbrukets klimatomställning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Miljö- och jordbruksutskottet (MJU)
@@ -2144,22 +2144,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21">HD01MJU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — Riksrevisionen critical audit of agricultural climate transition policy
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]
 <strong>Data Depth</strong>: METADATA-ONLY (no summary available in API response)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-7">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-7">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen considered Riksrevisionen's report on the state's efforts to support agriculture's climate transition. No full summary available in API; based on metadata and Riksrevisionen standard audit format: the report critically assesses whether government programs effectively support agricultural sector decarbonization, and whether targets under Sweden's climate framework are being met.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-7">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-7">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksrevisionen audits trigger parliamentary scrutiny of government program effectiveness. Agricultural climate transition is politically contentious: the Tidö coalition has been perceived as less ambitious on climate than previous S-led government. An audit finding inadequate state support for agricultural climate transition would be politically damaging for the government. The MJU committee would need to respond to Riksrevisionen's recommendations.</p>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: Full analysis limited by metadata-only retrieval. Further detail would require full text access.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01MJU21</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:MJU21, datum 2026-04-20 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU21">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU21</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu20">HD01SfU20<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu20"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01SfU20
 <strong>Title</strong>: Ett slopat krav på anmälan före ansökan om föräldrapenning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-16
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L1 Surface — Administrative simplification, social insurance
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-8">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-8">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved removing the requirement to pre-notify (anmäla) before applying for föräldrapenning (parental benefit):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Eliminates bureaucratic pre-notification step</li>
@@ -2167,37 +2167,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-8">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Technical corrections to socialförsäkringsbalken for alignment with current legislation</li>
 <li>Implementation: Removal of notification requirement 1 July 2026; other corrections 31 May 2026 (retroactive to 1 Jan 2026)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-8">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-8">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-8"></a></h3>
 <p>A clear administrative simplification with broad political support. Forsäkringskassan noted the existing notification requirement no longer serves a control function. Benefits families by reducing bureaucratic burden. Relatively low political salience but exemplifies the government's stated deregulation agenda. Before election, such small welfare improvements help demonstrate competent administration.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01SfU20</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:SfU20, datum 2026-04-16 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU20">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU20</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu16">HD01TU16<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01TU16
 <strong>Title</strong>: Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Trafikutskottet (TU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L1 Surface — Road safety regulation, driving license reform
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-9">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-9">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-9"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved removal of the compulsory introductory course (introduktionsutbildning) for supervised driving practice (övningskörning) for B-licence:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Course has been mandatory since 2006 for both learner drivers and supervisors</li>
 <li>Removal justified by lack of evidence of intended effectiveness in improving practice quality</li>
 <li>Change takes effect 1 August 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-9">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-9">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-9"></a></h3>
 <p>This deregulation removes a requirement that many families found an unnecessary administrative and cost burden. Traffic safety authorities may have mixed views, but the government's assessment is that the course did not achieve its stated goals. The measure has bipartisan appeal as a common-sense deregulation — reduces cost for young drivers and their families.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01TU16</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:TU16, datum 2026-04-21 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU16">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU16</a></p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/electoral-domain-methodology.md</code>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Election</strong>: Swedish general election, September 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden holds its next general election in September 2026 under the current 4-year electoral cycle (last election September 2022). The April 2026 committee reports batch represents the spring legislative sprint — five months before election day.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-by-document">Electoral Impact by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-by-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-by-document">Electoral Impact by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-by-document"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Electoral Impact: Voter Groups vs. Election Salience
@@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-by-document">Electoral Impact by Document<a class=""
     KU22-Guardianship: [0.4, 0.2]
     MJU19-Waste Law: [0.2, 0.1]
     TU16-Driving Course: [0.3, 0.5]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-delta">Seat Projection Delta<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-delta"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-delta">Seat Projection Delta<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-delta"></a></h3>
 <p>Current seat distribution (est. post-2022):</p>
 
 
@@ -2235,7 +2235,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-delta">Seat Projection Delta<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Block</th><th>Approx seats</th><th>Change signal from April 2026</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L)</td><td>176</td><td>FiU48 may +3–5 seats in rural/suburban Sweden; climate risk −1–2 educated urban</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition (S+V+MP+C)</td><td>173</td><td>FiU48 gives S energy policy attack surface; MJU21 aids MP/C climate argument</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Net projection impact: <strong>Marginally positive for coalition</strong> on current evidence, driven by household economics salience (FiU48) outweighing climate concerns (MJU21). However, margin is within polling noise — confidence LOW [C4].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-voter-segments-affected">Key Voter Segments Affected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segments-affected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-voter-segments-affected">Key Voter Segments Affected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segments-affected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2278,9 +2278,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-voter-segments-affected">Key Voter Segments Affected<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size (est.)</th><th>Decision Impact</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Car-dependent rural households</td><td>~1.2M voters</td><td>HIGH</td><td>+Coalition (FiU48 fuel relief)</td></tr><tr><td>Housing-market investors/owners</td><td>~750,000 bostadsrätter</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>+Coalition (CU27/CU28 stability)</td></tr><tr><td>Urban educated (climate voters)</td><td>~900,000</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>−Coalition (FiU48 climate signal)</td></tr><tr><td>Elderly/guardianship affected</td><td>~100,000 adults + families</td><td>LOW</td><td>Neutral (CU22 cross-party)</td></tr><tr><td>Young drivers (18–25)</td><td>~400,000</td><td>LOW</td><td>Slightly positive (TU16 deregulation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics-context">Coalition Mathematics Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-mathematics-context">Coalition Mathematics Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Constitutional amendments (KU33/KU32) require post-election confirmation — this creates a unique electoral dynamic where the constitutional reform agenda itself becomes a campaign issue. Parties must now campaign on whether they will ratify the second vote.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-triggers">Forward Electoral Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-electoral-triggers">Forward Electoral Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-triggers"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>July 2026</strong>: Party manifestos published — will all parties commit to KU33/KU32 second vote?</li>
 <li><strong>August 2026</strong>: Final Riksbank assessment before election — any inflation signal will hurt coalition</li>
@@ -2289,8 +2289,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-triggers">Forward Electoral Triggers<a class="" ari
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Overall assessment</strong>: The April 2026 legislative sprint has placed the Tidö coalition in a favorable but not decisive pre-election position. FiU48 is the most potent tool — but fiscal and climate narratives will contest its effectiveness. Confidence: MEDIUM [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result">Current Seat Distribution (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result">Current Seat Distribution (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2364,7 +2364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result">Current Seat Distribu
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Block</th><th>Seats</th><th>Share</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>73</td><td>20.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>68</td><td>19.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Socialdemokraterna (S)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>107</td><td>30.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>24</td><td>6.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>24</td><td>6.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>19</td><td>5.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Liberalerna (L)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>16</td><td>4.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>18</td><td>5.1%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>49.4%</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition total</strong></td><td></td><td><strong>173</strong></td><td><strong>48.8%</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Source: valmyndigheten.se election 2022 [A1 equivalent]</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments">Pivotal Vote Analysis for Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments">Pivotal Vote Analysis for Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments"></a></h3>
 <p>For KU33 and KU32 to pass the <strong>second vote</strong> in the post-election Riksdag:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Required: Absolute majority in new Riksdag (175+ seats of 349)</li>
@@ -2408,18 +2408,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments">Pivotal Vote Ana
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>KU33 Pass?</th><th>KU32 Pass?</th><th>Coalition basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö re-elected</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Same coalition votes same</td></tr><tr><td>S minority + V</td><td>Nej (likely)</td><td>Ja (likely)</td><td>S opposes KU33 on FOI grounds</td></tr><tr><td>S + M grand coalition</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Grand coalition rare but possible</td></tr><tr><td>S + C + MP</td><td>Nej</td><td>Ja</td><td>Environmental parties oppose KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis">Sainte-Laguë Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis">Sainte-Laguë Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>Seat distribution is sensitive to minor parties near the 4% threshold. Featherstone scenarios:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>If MP falls below 4%: seats redistribute; likely benefits S or C; opposition loses 18 seats net</li>
 <li>If Nydemokraterna or other small party enters above 4%: could shift balance</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Current April 2026 polls suggest both major blocks remain near 50/50 with election outcome highly uncertain. The April 2026 legislative sprint (FiU48 energy support) is a deliberate attempt to move this balance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Seat numbers from official 2022 election [A1]. Polling projections for 2026 based on structural analysis [B3]. Constitutional second-vote mechanics confirmed from KU33/KU32 text [A1].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-demographic-segmentation">Demographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segmentation"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-demographic-segmentation">Demographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segmentation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2489,7 +2489,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-demographic-segmentation">Demographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Estimated size</th><th>Primary concern</th><th>Relevance to this batch</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural car-dependent households</td><td>~1.2M voters</td><td>Transport costs, energy</td><td>FiU48 (HD01FiU48) direct relief</td><td>+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Urban professional commuters</td><td>~800,000</td><td>Housing affordability, crime</td><td>CU27/CU28 property reforms</td><td>+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Housing cooperative owners</td><td>~1.5M (bostadsrättsägare)</td><td>Market transparency, values</td><td>CU28 register, CU27 security</td><td>+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-prioritizing voters</td><td>~700,000</td><td>Climate policy, green transition</td><td>FiU48 negative; MJU21 negative</td><td>−Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Disability community + families</td><td>~300,000</td><td>Accessibility, CRPD compliance</td><td>CU22 (guardianship reform)</td><td>Neutral/+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Elderly and vulnerable adults</td><td>~600,000</td><td>Welfare, guardianship quality</td><td>CU22 (ställföreträdarskap)</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>Farming sector</td><td>~80,000 workers</td><td>Rural subsidies, climate</td><td>MJU21 (Riksrevisionen critique), FiU48 diesel</td><td>Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Young adults (18–30)</td><td>~900,000</td><td>Housing, employment</td><td>CU28 (future homebuyers), TU16</td><td>+Coalition mild</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-segmentation">Regional Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segmentation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-segmentation">Regional Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segmentation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2521,17 +2521,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-segmentation">Regional Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Region type</th><th>Primary driver</th><th>April 2026 relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Norrland (north)</td><td>Energy costs, rural services</td><td>FiU48 very high salience (high fuel dependency)</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm metropolitan</td><td>Housing market, crime</td><td>CU27/CU28 very high salience</td></tr><tr><td>Gothenburg/Malmö</td><td>Manufacturing, crime, energy</td><td>FiU48 moderate; CU27 moderate</td></tr><tr><td>Smaland/rural south</td><td>Farming, car dependency</td><td>FiU48 high; MJU21 negative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues">Baseline Positions on Key Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues">Baseline Positions on Key Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues"></a></h3>
 <p>For a "procedural day" baseline (no specific legislation): rural Sweden = SD/M stronghold; urban educated = MP/S/C stronghold. The April 2026 batch reinforces these patterns — FiU48 advantages SD/M rural support while climate costs continue to disadvantage them with urban educated.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Segmentation estimates based on SCB population data [B2] and Swedish Election Research Program (VALU) typical voter distribution [B3]. Size estimates are approximations; directional signals are more reliable than exact numbers.</p>
 <p>Evidence basis: HD01FiU48 [A1], HD01CU27/28 [A1], HD01CU22 [A1], HD01MJU21 [A1]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Norway (NO), Denmark (DK), Finland (FI) — Nordic baseline; Germany (DE) — EU major economy energy policy comparator; European Union level — constitutional accessibility obligations</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2587,12 +2587,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Measure</th><th>Analogous Policy</th><th>Similarity Score</th><th>Key Difference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Norway (NO)</td><td>FiU48 — fuel tax cut</td><td>NO: Fuel subsidies during energy crisis 2022–23 (petrol/diesel tax relief)</td><td>8/10 — same mechanism, same electoral motivations</td><td>NO subsidies were temporary and targeted; SE cut less generous but EU-minimum constrained</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark (DK)</td><td>FiU48 — energy support</td><td>DK: Varmechecks 2022 (heating support for low-income households)</td><td>6/10 — similar household energy support</td><td>DK more targeted (means-tested); SE universal</td></tr><tr><td>Finland (FI)</td><td>CU22 — guardianship reform</td><td>FI: Laki edunvalvonnasta 1999 (now reformed 2022)</td><td>7/10 — similar reform trajectory, CRPD pressure</td><td>FI reformed earlier; SE now aligning; FI has electronic records since 2020</td></tr><tr><td>Germany (DE)</td><td>FiU48 — fuel subsidy</td><td>DE: Tankrabatt 2022 (90-day fuel tax cut during energy crisis)</td><td>9/10 — almost identical mechanism</td><td>DE limited to 3 months; SE limited to 5 months; both temporary; both politically motivated</td></tr><tr><td>EU level</td><td>KU32 — accessibility for media</td><td>EU: European Accessibility Act (EAA) Directive 2019/882</td><td>Direct transposition</td><td>SE constitutional protection required extraordinary process (vilande); other MS implemented directly</td></tr><tr><td>EU level</td><td>MJU19 — waste reform</td><td>EU: Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC (revised 2018)</td><td>Direct transposition</td><td>SE late implementation (2026 vs. 2018/2022 deadline)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se">What Sweden can learn from Germany's Tankrabatt (DE → SE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se">What Sweden can learn from Germany's Tankrabatt (DE → SE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt lasted 90 days, cost ~€3.1bn, was fiercely contested by environmental groups, and was not renewed. Sweden's FiU48 fuel cut runs 153 days (1 May–30 Sep 2026) at ~SEK 1.5bn revenue loss — similar proportional cost. <strong>German lesson</strong>: The subsidy boosted German election-year approval for the governing coalition (SPD-led) but delivered marginal inflation impact and was criticized by Bundesbank as market-distorting. Sweden should note: Riksbank has an independent mandate and may similarly signal concern. DE experience suggests subsidy expires cleanly if political will holds — but pre-election extensions are tempting (DE did not extend; risk that SE may).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law">Norway's experience with constitutional-level media law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law">Norway's experience with constitutional-level media law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law"></a></h4>
 <p>Norway revised its Grunnloven (constitution) in 2014–2016 to better accommodate EU media regulation, using a similar two-vote process. <strong>Norwegian lesson</strong>: The Norwegian constitutional amendments took three years from first to second vote (vs. Sweden's planned 6-month turnaround driven by election cycle). Constitutional speed in Sweden is driven by election scheduling rather than deliberation quality — a procedural risk if legal tensions emerge between KU33 and existing JO/HD jurisprudence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-4">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-4">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Comparative fiscal measures (FiU48 vs. NO/DE): HIGH [B2] — based on public data from NO/DE treasury announcements</li>
 <li>Constitutional comparisons: MEDIUM [B3] — based on general knowledge of Nordic constitutional processes</li>
@@ -2600,23 +2600,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-4">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Comparator rows</strong>: 6 (meets minimum 2 requirement per gate check)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process">Primary Parallel: 1994 TF Constitutional Reform Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process">Primary Parallel: 1994 TF Constitutional Reform Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: KU33/KU32 — vilande constitutional amendments on TF and YGL</p>
 <p>The 1994 Fundamental Law (TF) reforms followed an identical two-Riksdag procedure under RF 8:14. The key precedent: the <strong>1991–1994 constitutional cycle</strong> where Riksdag dissolved in September 1991, new Riksdag elected, and the second vote on the then-pending reform passed in spring 1994 with cross-party support.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: When constitutional amendments align with broad modernization narratives (digital era access to public documents), they typically survive election transitions even when the sponsoring government changes. Confidence: MEDIUM [B2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022">Secondary Parallel: Energy Price Crisis Response 2021–2022<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022">Secondary Parallel: Energy Price Crisis Response 2021–2022<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: HD01FiU48 — SEK 4.1bn emergency energy/fuel budget amendment</p>
 <p>Sweden enacted emergency household energy support in Q4 2021 and Q1 2022 under the Andersson (S) government, including fuel subsidy equivalents. The 2022 autumn election featured energy costs prominently; SD and M leveraged the issue effectively, contributing to their 2022 victory.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: Emergency fuel/energy support packages immediately before elections have significant polling effect in Sweden — particularly in rural constituencies. FiU48 replicates this strategy from the government side, not opposition side. [B3]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022">Tertiary Parallel: Anti-Money-Laundering Property Reforms (2018–2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022">Tertiary Parallel: Anti-Money-Laundering Property Reforms (2018–2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: HD01CU27/CU28 — AML property safeguards</p>
 <p>Following FATF's 2017 evaluation that rated Sweden's real estate AML compliance as "partially compliant," Sweden undertook successive legislative improvements. The CU27/CU28 batch continues this multi-cycle reform.</p>
 <p><strong>Precedent</strong>: Similar multi-cycle AML reforms in Denmark (2018) and Finland (2020) took 3–4 years to fully implement and faced industry resistance at each stage. Swedish reforms track the Nordic pattern closely.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017">Quaternary Parallel: Guardianship Reform Process 2011–2017<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017">Quaternary Parallel: Guardianship Reform Process 2011–2017<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: HD01CU22 — Ställföreträdarskap reform</p>
 <p>Sweden's 2011 Föräldrabalken guardianship reforms also proceeded incrementally over multiple sessions. The current CU22 reform represents a third generation of reform (2011 → 2017 → 2026 trajectory), each adding CRPD compliance layers. This incremental pattern suggests continued reform in 2027–2028 regardless of which government takes office.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-matrix">Confidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-matrix">Confidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2654,8 +2654,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-matrix">Confidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parallel</th><th>Recency</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1994 TF reform</td><td>32 years</td><td>Direct legislative precedent [A1]</td><td>MEDIUM [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>2022 energy election</td><td>4 years</td><td>Electoral outcome data [A1]</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic AML cycle</td><td>4-8 years</td><td>Comparative national data [B2]</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Guardianship reform</td><td>9 years</td><td>Swedish statute history [A1]</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-scorecard">Feasibility Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-scorecard"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-scorecard">Feasibility Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-scorecard">Feasibility Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Implementation type</th><th>Risk level</th><th>Key bottleneck</th><th>Feasibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Legislative + regulatory (tax rules)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Existing Skatteverket infrastructure</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Constitutional second vote</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional second vote</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Same as KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Brottsbalken amendment (property sanctions)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Courts/prosecution capacity</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>IT registry (bostadsrätter)</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>IT system build, LB/HSB compliance</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU22</td><td>New myndighet (guardianship oversight)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Funding, staffing, IVO redesign</td><td>MEDIUM-LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Agricultural/climate monitoring</td><td>LOW</td><td>Existing JV/SBA infrastructure</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Waste law amendment</td><td>LOW</td><td>Industry compliance</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Civil preparedness update</td><td>LOW</td><td>Existing MSB infrastructure</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Driver education deregulation</td><td>LOW</td><td>Transport agency rule update</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-path-analysis">Critical Path Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system">CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister IT System<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-path-analysis">Critical Path Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system">CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister IT System<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system"></a></h4>
 <p>Most complex single implementation item. Sweden's existing property registries are managed by Lantmäteriet; integrating bostadsrätt ownership is novel. Risks:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>GDPR-compliant data architecture required (personal data + ownership records)</li>
@@ -2749,7 +2749,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system">CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister
 <li>Target implementation date per government: Q2 2027 (post-election)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Feasibility assessment</strong>: MEDIUM — technically achievable but procurement and compliance delays likely push full implementation to 2027–2028.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet">CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet">CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet"></a></h4>
 <p>Creating a new oversight authority requires:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Government proposition 2026/27 (next parliament)</li>
@@ -2758,9 +2758,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet">CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet<a
 <li>IVO role redesign to avoid overlap</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Feasibility assessment</strong>: LOW in the immediate term; MEDIUM over 2027–2028 horizon. Likely requires next government commitment regardless of election outcome.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Purely procedural; no administration required. The second vote is a Riksdag decision, not an executive implementation task. Risk is political (election outcome) not administrative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-resource-requirements-summary">Resource Requirements Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-resource-requirements-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-resource-requirements-summary">Resource Requirements Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-resource-requirements-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2799,9 +2799,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-resource-requirements-summary">Resource Requirements Summary<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Resource type</th><th>High demand items</th><th>Estimated cost</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>IT investment</td><td>CU28 registry</td><td>SEK 150–300M (estimate)</td></tr><tr><td>Staffing</td><td>CU22 new authority</td><td>SEK 80–120M/year</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal</td><td>FiU48 energy support</td><td>SEK 4.1bn (per legislation)</td></tr><tr><td>Court capacity</td><td>CU27 new offences</td><td>Marginal increase</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td>TU16, MJU19</td><td>Low (rule update only)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Confidence: Implementation cost estimates are structural [B3]; IT cost estimates are high-uncertainty [C4].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management">Hypothesis H1: FiU48 is Primarily About Electoral Strategy, Not Genuine Crisis Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management">Hypothesis H1: FiU48 is Primarily About Electoral Strategy, Not Genuine Crisis Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The emergency budget mechanism is being misused for electoral purposes — the "extraordinary circumstances" threshold for extra ändringsbudget is not genuinely met; Middle East conflict and winter energy prices would have normalized without intervention.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H1</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2817,7 +2817,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Score</strong>: Hypothesis H1 is <strong>LIKELY consistent</strong> with evidence — the timing correlation is strong, though genuine crisis elements also exist. Most accurate characterization: crisis-and-electoral motivations are both present.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen">Hypothesis H2: KU33 (TF Digital Seizure Amendment) is a Disproportionate Restriction on Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen">Hypothesis H2: KU33 (TF Digital Seizure Amendment) is a Disproportionate Restriction on Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The proposed TF amendment restricting public access to seized digital materials goes further than law enforcement operational need requires and systematically reduces transparency in criminal investigations in ways that could protect government officials from accountability.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H2</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2833,7 +2833,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Score</strong>: H2 is <strong>POSSIBLY consistent</strong> with evidence — there are legitimate civil society concerns but the hypothesis of deliberate governmental accountability shield overstates the likely intent. The operational law enforcement argument is substantial.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering">Hypothesis H3: CU27/CU28 Housing Reforms Will Not Significantly Reduce Money Laundering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering">Hypothesis H3: CU27/CU28 Housing Reforms Will Not Significantly Reduce Money Laundering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The property identity requirements (CU27) and bostadsrättsregister (CU28) address surface-level transparency but do not target the sophisticated layering structures used by organized crime networks, which use legitimate legal entities to obscure ultimate beneficial ownership.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H3</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2849,7 +2849,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Score</strong>: H3 is <strong>LIKELY consistent</strong> — CU27/CU28 are genuine improvements but will not substantially disrupt sophisticated money laundering operations. Useful as incremental improvement, not systemic solution. Further AMLD implementation would be needed for comprehensive effect.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Challenge to lead finding</strong>: The dominant intelligence picture frames FiU48 as the most significant decision. A red team analyst might argue that <strong>KU33 is actually more consequential long-term</strong> because:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Constitutional amendments are extremely hard to reverse (unlike budget measures)</li>
@@ -2857,7 +2857,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>The electoral impact of FiU48 is 5 months; the constitutional impact of KU33 is indefinite</li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Red team conclusion</strong>: Both FiU48 (high short-term electoral significance) and KU33 (high long-term constitutional significance) deserve P0 treatment. The framing of FiU48 as "lead story" is justified for election-year purposes but understates the structural importance of KU33.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2881,8 +2881,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Alternative</th><th>Reason Rejected</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 will cause sustained inflation (3%+)</td><td>ECB/Riksbank tools exist; 5-month fuel subsidy too short-term to cause structural inflation</td></tr><tr><td>CU22 guardian reform will be politically controversial</td><td>Cross-party support expected; no evidence of partisan opposition; CRPD alignment creates broad consensus</td></tr><tr><td>MJU19 waste reform will face industry opposition</td><td>EU-mandate driven; major industry players already aligned; implementation practical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2993,7 +2993,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD01FiU48</th><th>HD01KU33</th><th>HD01KU32</th><th>HD01CU27</th><th>HD01CU28</th><th>HD01CU22</th><th>HD01MJU21</th><th>HD01MJU19</th><th>HD01SfU20</th><th>HD01TU16</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1. Political temperature</strong></td><td>Hot (5)</td><td>Hot (4)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Neutral (2)</td><td>Neutral (2)</td><td>Neutral (2)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2. Partisan alignment</strong></td><td>Coalition-driven</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Government scrutiny</td><td>EU-driven</td><td>Administrative</td><td>Administrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>3. Timeline urgency</strong></td><td>Immediate (5)</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>EU compliance</td><td>Administrative</td><td>Administrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>4. Scope</strong></td><td>National fiscal</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Property market</td><td>Property market</td><td>Social welfare</td><td>Agricultural</td><td>Environmental</td><td>Social insurance</td><td>Road safety</td></tr><tr><td><strong>5. Reversibility</strong></td><td>Low (election-year)</td><td>Very Low (grundlag)</td><td>Very Low (grundlag)</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td>Low</td><td>N/A (audit)</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>6. EU dimension</strong></td><td>Yes (energy directive)</td><td>No</td><td>Yes (EU accessibility)</td><td>No direct</td><td>No direct</td><td>CRPD indirect</td><td>EU climate</td><td>EU circular economy</td><td>No</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td><strong>7. Election signal</strong></td><td>Strong positive</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Positive</td><td>Positive</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Negative potential</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Positive</td><td>Positive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3025,7 +3025,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Documents</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>P0 — Immediate action</strong></td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Fiscal policy with 1 May 2026 implementation; election-defining significance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P1 — High priority</strong></td><td>HD01KU33, HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>Constitutional change; major property market reforms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P2 — Significant</strong></td><td>HD01KU32, HD01CU22, HD01MJU21, HD01MJU19</td><td>Important legislative/EU compliance/audit significance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P3 — Background</strong></td><td>HD01SfU20, HD01TU16</td><td>Administrative simplification; low controversy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3052,39 +3052,39 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; Access<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Classification</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Data retention</td><td>7 years (standard political analysis retention per ISMS)</td></tr><tr><td>Access control</td><td>Public — all sources from public primary sources (riksdagen.se)</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR Article 9</td><td>Not applicable — no individual political opinion data; party positions are public</td></tr><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>Standard public intelligence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-source-classification">Source Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-classification">Source Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-classification"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents: Primary public source [A1] — Riksdagen API (data.riksdagen.se), confirmed via MCP at 2026-04-23T04:45Z</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy">Cluster 1: Election-Year Fiscal and Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy">Cluster 1: Election-Year Fiscal and Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01FiU48 (Extra ändringsbudget)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01MJU21 (agricultural energy/climate — MJU scrutiny), HD01MJU19 (waste/circular economy EU compliance)</li>
 <li><strong>Tension</strong>: FiU48 fuel tax cuts vs. MJU19/MJU21 environmental ambition</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: Household economics vs. long-term climate policy trade-off</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package">Cluster 2: Constitutional Modernization Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package">Cluster 2: Constitutional Modernization Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01KU33 (TF — beslag/husrannsakan digital insyn)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01KU32 (TF+YGL — tillgänglighetskrav medier)</li>
 <li><strong>Link</strong>: Both are vilande grundlagsändringar decided in same KU session; both require post-election second vote</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: Digital-era constitutional adaptation — crime-fighting efficiency × fundamental freedoms</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime">Cluster 3: Housing Market Transparency and Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime">Cluster 3: Housing Market Transparency and Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01CU27 (Identitetskrav lagfart + bostadsrättslagen)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01CU28 (Nationellt bostadsrättsregister)</li>
 <li><strong>Link</strong>: Both CU committee; complementary measures; both effective before/around election</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: Property market integrity, anti-money laundering, consumer protection</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform">Cluster 4: Social Welfare and Administrative Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform">Cluster 4: Social Welfare and Administrative Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01CU22 (Ställföreträdarskap)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01SfU20 (Föräldrapenning), HD01TU16 (Körkort)</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: State service simplification, CRPD compliance, administrative deregulation</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     subgraph "Constitutional Chain"
@@ -3114,22 +3114,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style CU28 fill:#7B1FA2,color:#fff
     style FiU48 fill:#E65100,color:#fff
     style ENERGY fill:#FF8F00,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 2026 legislative sprint shows coordinated committee scheduling:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>FiU (FiU48) + KU (KU33, KU32) + CU (CU27, CU28, CU22) all reporting in the same week of 17–21 April 2026</li>
 <li>Pattern: Government tabling and committee approval synchronized for maximum legislative throughput before the summer recess and election campaign</li>
 <li>This is not unusual: the spring riksmöte sprint is standard, but the political salience of this year's package is higher than typical due to election-year timing</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling Folder Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling Folder Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h3>
 <p>No sibling analysis folders present for this date (first run). Future Tier-C aggregation should reference:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> if props workflow runs same day</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/evening-analysis/</code> for synthesis integration</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3186,7 +3186,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 Standard</th><th>Compliance</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Timely, objective analysis</td><td>PASS</td><td>Produced within hours; no partisan framing</td></tr><tr><td>2. Analytic tradecraft</td><td>PASS</td><td>Admiralty codes + WEP throughout</td></tr><tr><td>3. Distinguish intel from assessment</td><td>PASS</td><td>A1 = primary fact; B3/C3 = interpretive</td></tr><tr><td>4. Respect policymakers</td><td>PASS</td><td>Descriptive, not prescriptive</td></tr><tr><td>5. Transparent sources</td><td>PASS</td><td>All 10 dok_ids cited; MCP chain documented</td></tr><tr><td>6. Identify uncertainties</td><td>PASS</td><td>Confidence levels explicit</td></tr><tr><td>7. Robust processes</td><td>PASS</td><td>ACH, scenarios, SWOT+TOWS, DIW scoring</td></tr><tr><td>8. Structured analytic techniques</td><td>PASS</td><td>10 SAT techniques applied</td></tr><tr><td>9. Accurate information collection</td><td>PASS</td><td>All dok_ids verified via riksdagen.se API 2026-04-23</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Level</th><th>Count</th><th>Pct</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>5</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td>8</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td>7</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>LOW</td><td>3</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>VERY LOW</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques">SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques">SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3274,14 +3274,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques">SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Technique</th><th>Applied In</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td><td>devils-advocate.md (H1, H2, H3)</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT + TOWS</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md (3 scenarios, sum 100%)</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Mapping</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md (15 actors)</td></tr><tr><td>Red Team Challenge</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td></tr><tr><td>DIW Scoring</td><td>significance-scoring.md (10 documents)</td></tr><tr><td>TTP Analysis</td><td>threat-analysis.md (TTP-01 to TTP-04)</td></tr><tr><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md (5 assumptions)</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative International</td><td>comparative-international.md (6 comparators)</td></tr><tr><td>Historical Parallels</td><td>historical-parallels.md</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents">Improvement 1: Full Text for High-DIW Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents">Improvement 1: Full Text for High-DIW Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents"></a></h4>
 <p>HD01MJU21 was METADATA-ONLY. Next cycle: get_dokument_innehall with include_full_text: true for all L2+ documents (DIW >= 10) to improve evidence quality.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment">Improvement 2: Vote Record Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment">Improvement 2: Vote Record Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment"></a></h4>
 <p>No get_voteringar calls in this run. For FiU48 and KU33/KU32 vilande votes, party-by-party records would confirm partisan alignment and elevate confidence from B3 to B2.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration">Improvement 3: Anforanden Integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration">Improvement 3: Anforanden Integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration"></a></h4>
 <p>Use search_anforanden for FiU48 debates to obtain direct MP quotes, transforming unnamed party position claims into attributed statements with higher evidence quality.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3343,7 +3343,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Favorable</th><th>Critical</th><th>Balance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>Slightly positive (CU22 driver)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>Slightly positive</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>Reflects V actual position</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>Reflects MP actual position</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-committee-reports
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24817022343
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-23T04:45:00Z
@@ -3352,7 +3352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Data Window</strong>: 2025/26 riksmöte, from_date 2026-04-01
 <strong>Riksdag Session</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>MCP Status</strong>: live (riksdag-regering: OK, sync confirmed 2026-04-23T04:39:41Z)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-table">Document Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-table">Document Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3461,7 +3461,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-table">Document Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <p><strong>Total documents</strong>: 10
 <strong>Full text available</strong>: 0 (API confirms fulltext_available=true; not fetched in this run to preserve rate limits)
 <strong>Summary available</strong>: 9/10 (HD01MJU21 has no summary — METADATA-ONLY)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>riksdag-regering</code> MCP: Available and live; sync at 2026-04-23T04:39:41Z</li>
 <li>Retrieval performed via <code>get_betankanden</code> + <code>search_dokument</code> + <code>get_dokument_innehall</code></li>
@@ -3469,11 +3469,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li><code>world-bank</code> MCP: Not queried in this manifest phase</li>
 <li>IMF data: Not queried in this manifest phase</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality">Data Quality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality">Data Quality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 10 documents confirmed from riksdagen.se primary source [A1] per Admiralty Code</li>
 <li>Zero hallucinated dok_ids — all verified via API response</li>
 <li>Article date 2026-04-23 is current; lookback not required (multiple documents from 2026-04-14 to 2026-04-21)</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3529,7 +3565,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:09.610Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:31.046Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html b/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html
index 2ad8cdc0f2..4bc76ecd66 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.768Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.208Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.768Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.208Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion","description":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal package (fuel tax cuts + energy support) and two dormant constitutional amendments (TF/YGL) with significant pre-election…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:09.768Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion","description":"Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal package (fuel tax cuts + energy support) and two dormant constitutional amendments (TF/YGL) with significant pre-election…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:31.208Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-committeeReports-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Riksdag in April 2026 approved an emergency SEK 4.1 billion fiscal package (fuel tax cuts + energy support) and two dormant constitutional amendments (TF/YGL) with significant pre-election implications. The fiscal intervention directly lowers household energy costs five months before the September 2026 election, while the constitutional reforms require post-election ratification — creating legal continuity stakes tied to election outcomes. Three housing market transparency measures (property identity requirements and a national bostadsrättsregister) add up to the most significant housing market reform in over a decade.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Support
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Decision</th><th>Supported By</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td><strong>Electoral strategy assessment</strong>: Does FiU48 benefit the Tidö coalition?</td><td>HD01FiU48 fiscal analysis + electoral impact model</td><td>MEDIUM [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td><strong>Constitutional continuity risk</strong>: What happens to KU33/KU32 if government changes post-election?</td><td>HD01KU33 + HD01KU32 vilande status analysis</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td><strong>Housing market transparency</strong>: Are CU27/CU28 effective anti-money laundering measures?</td><td>HD01CU27 + HD01CU28 combined property reform analysis</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>FISCAL EMERGENCY (HIGH PRIORITY)
 • HD01FiU48: SEK 4.1bn emergency budget → fuel tax −82 öre/L petrol, −319 kr/m³ diesel
 • Period: 1 May–30 Sep 2026 (election campaign window)
@@ -280,11 +280,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 • HD01TU16: Mandatory driving course for övningskörning removed
 </code></pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🚨 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🚨 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch</strong>: How S, V, and MP respond to FiU48 in the Riksdag debate and campaign messaging. If the opposition frames this as fiscal irresponsibility + climate regression, it will define a key election battleground. Monitor Riksbank commentary on inflationary effects of fuel subsidy policy — central bank disagreement would amplify opposition arguments.</p>
 <p><strong>PIR-1 Trigger</strong>: Constitutional second vote on KU33/KU32 is required after election — monitor election outcome and post-election coalition formation for continuity risk signal.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-label-summary">Confidence Label Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-label-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-label-summary">Confidence Label Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-label-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-label-summary">Confidence Label Summary<a class="" aria-hi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Area</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal figures (FiU48)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Primary source HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional process (KU33/KU32)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Primary source HD01KU33/KU32 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Property reform (CU27/CU28)</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Primary source HD01CU27/CU28 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral impact analysis</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Structural reasoning, known party positions [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election constitutional continuity</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Constitutional law analysis [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>WEP Quick Reference</strong> (Pass 2 improvement — explicit probability anchors):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><em>Almost certain</em> (95%+): Vilande amendments (KU33/KU32) adopted by current Riksdag — procedure is binding</li>
@@ -333,16 +333,16 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty source assessment</strong>: All factual claims [A1] (official Riksdag documents); electoral projection [C3] (structural analyst inference).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis folder</strong>: <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/</code>
 <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23T05:00:00Z
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/synthesis-methodology.md</code> + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>
 <strong>Admiralty overall</strong>: [B2] — Multiple reliable primary sources, information independently corroborated</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift">🎯 Lead Story: Emergency Budget Signals Pre-Election Fiscal Shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift">🎯 Lead Story: Emergency Budget Signals Pre-Election Fiscal Shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-emergency-budget-signals-pre-election-fiscal-shift"></a></h3>
 <p>The highest-significance decision in this batch is <strong>HD01FiU48</strong> (Extra ändringsbudget 2026), which represents the Tidö coalition deploying SEK 4.1 billion in emergency fiscal measures — fuel tax cuts and energy support — just five months before the September 2026 election. This is the dominant intelligence picture: a government using constitutional emergency budget procedures for what critics will characterize as election-year fiscal stimulus.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-ranking">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Ra
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — drivmedelsskatt + energistöd</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>15/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn — beslag och husrannsakan (TF vilande)</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>13/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart + bostadsrättslagen</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12/15</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för medier (TF+YGL vilande)</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>11/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01CU22</td><td>Ställföreträdarskap att lita på</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>10/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Riksrevisionen — jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9/15</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Slopat krav anmälan föräldrapenning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6/15</td><td>L1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Slopat krav introduktionsutbildning körning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6/15</td><td>L1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>D = Decision impact, I = Implementation urgency, W = Political weight</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","secondaryColor":"#2E7D32","secondaryTextColor":"#ffffff","tertiaryColor":"#FF6B35","tertiaryTextColor":"#ffffff","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 mindmap
   root((Committee Reports&#x3C;br/>April 2026))
@@ -505,26 +505,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-️-integrated-intelligence-picture">🗺️ Integrated Intelligence
     classDef high fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
     classDef medium fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff
     classDef low fill:#616161,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--five-strategic-themes">🔍 Five Strategic Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--five-strategic-themes"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance">1. Pre-Election Fiscal Stimulus (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-five-strategic-themes">🔍 Five Strategic Themes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-five-strategic-themes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance">1. Pre-Election Fiscal Stimulus (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-fiscal-stimulus-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>FiU48 is an election-year emergency measure. The government's use of the extraordinary "extra ändringsbudget" mechanism for household energy cost relief signals that energy/fuel prices are perceived as an existential electoral threat. The SEK 4.1bn cost will feature in the autumn campaign — both as evidence of government responsiveness (coalition framing) and as fiscal irresponsibility (opposition framing).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance">2. Constitutional Modernization Before Election (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance">2. Constitutional Modernization Before Election (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-constitutional-modernization-before-election-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>Two TF/YGL amendments adopted as vilande in KU33 and KU32 require the incoming post-September 2026 Riksdag to ratify them. This creates a constitutional continuity dependency: a changed government or altered parliamentary majority could refuse the second vote. The constitutional package — restricting transparency of seized digital materials (KU33) and enabling accessibility obligations for media (KU32) — reflects a delicate balance between law enforcement modernization and fundamental freedoms.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance">3. Housing Market Integrity (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance">3. Housing Market Integrity (HIGH SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-housing-market-integrity-high-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>CU27 and CU28 together form a comprehensive housing market transparency reform: national bostadsrättsregister + identity requirements for property transfers. These address money laundering (CU27), consumer protection (CU28), and credit market efficiency (CU28). Both effective before election, creating tangible visible improvements for the large Swedish bostadsrätt owner constituency.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance">4. Environmental Governance Under Scrutiny (MEDIUM SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance">4. Environmental Governance Under Scrutiny (MEDIUM SIGNIFICANCE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-environmental-governance-under-scrutiny-medium-significance"></a></h4>
 <p>MJU21 (Riksrevisionen agriculture climate audit) and MJU19 (waste law reform) reflect dual pressures: EU compliance obligations (MJU19) and domestic audit scrutiny of climate policy effectiveness (MJU21). The Riksrevisionen finding on agricultural climate transition could emerge as a campaign issue if the government's rural/farming support bloc conflicts with its climate commitments.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals">5. Deregulation and Simplification Micro-signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals">5. Deregulation and Simplification Micro-signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-deregulation-and-simplification-micro-signals"></a></h4>
 <p>SfU20 and TU16 are individually minor but together signal the government's administrative deregulation agenda — removing requirements that no longer serve their stated purpose. Pre-election optics: competent, practical governance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata">📡 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">📡 AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SEO Title</strong> (EN): "Sweden's Riksdag Approves Emergency Fuel Tax Cut and Constitutional Reform Package, April 2026"
 <strong>SEO Title</strong> (SV): "Riksdagen godkänner nödbromsat drivmedelsskatt och grundlagspaket april 2026"
 <strong>Meta Description</strong> (EN): "Sweden's parliament approved emergency fuel tax cuts worth SEK 4.1 billion and three constitutional amendments in April 2026, setting the stage for a pivotal election-year legislative sprint."
 <strong>Keywords</strong>: committee reports, riksdag, fuel tax, constitutional amendment, bostadsrätt, election 2026, FiU48, KU33, Sweden politics</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Overall analysis confidence: HIGH [B2] — Based on official riksdagen.se primary sources for all 10 documents; fiscal figures confirmed from government budget text as summarized; political analysis MEDIUM [C3] based on structural reasoning from known party positions.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Source quality</strong>: [A1] Official riksdagen.se API data for all 10 documents — highest evidence grade.
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: PRIMARY = [B2] factual findings; SECONDARY = [C3] electoral interpretations.
 <strong>WEP Assessments</strong>:</p>
@@ -537,30 +537,30 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>Key assumptions</strong>: Election remains on constitutional schedule (September 2026); Riksdag quorum maintains throughout legislative session; FiU48 not challenged in court.</p>
 <p><strong>Limitations</strong>: No access to internal party polling, coalition agreement revision documents, or Riksdag committee debate records (anföranden) — these would improve confidence on KJ-1 and KJ-4.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48">Key Judgment KJ-1: The Tidö Coalition Will Gain Short-Term Electoral Benefit from FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48">Key Judgment KJ-1: The Tidö Coalition Will Gain Short-Term Electoral Benefit from FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-the-tidö-coalition-will-gain-short-term-electoral-benefit-from-fiu48"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>MEDIUM confidence</strong> that the emergency fuel tax cut and energy support package (HD01FiU48) will provide measurable short-term electoral benefit to the Tidö coalition, particularly with rural and commuter voters. The timing (1 May–30 Sep 2026, covering the election campaign) is deliberately calibrated. However, fiscal responsiveness may be partially offset by opposition framing of the SEK 4.1bn cost as irresponsible pre-election spending.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01FiU48 [A1] — fiscal figures confirmed; electoral impact MEDIUM [C3] — structural reasoning.
 <em>PIR-1 connection</em>: Monitor opposition response framing in September 2026 election results.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution">Key Judgment KJ-2: The Constitutional Package (KU33, KU32) Represents Genuine Policy Need Plus Election-Year Execution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution">Key Judgment KJ-2: The Constitutional Package (KU33, KU32) Represents Genuine Policy Need Plus Election-Year Execution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-the-constitutional-package-ku33-ku32-represents-genuine-policy-need-plus-election-year-execution"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>HIGH confidence</strong> that both TF amendments (KU33 digital seizure transparency; KU32 media accessibility) address genuine legal modernization needs, but are advanced on an accelerated timeline driven by election-cycle deadlines. The vilande status creates post-election constitutional continuity risk — particularly for KU33, which may face partisan opposition from an S-led government.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01KU33, HD01KU32 [A1] — constitutional process confirmed.
 <em>PIR-2 connection</em>: Monitor KU composition and coalition formation post-election for second-vote credibility.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor">Key Judgment KJ-3: Sweden's Housing Market Transparency Has a Meaningful Post-CU27/CU28 Improvement Floor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor">Key Judgment KJ-3: Sweden's Housing Market Transparency Has a Meaningful Post-CU27/CU28 Improvement Floor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-swedens-housing-market-transparency-has-a-meaningful-post-cu27cu28-improvement-floor"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>HIGH confidence</strong> that the combined CU27 (identity requirements) + CU28 (national register) reforms represent the most significant structural improvement to Swedish bostadsrätt market transparency in over a decade. Money laundering reduction will be partial (see H3 in devils-advocate.md) but the consumer protection and credit market efficiency gains are substantial and cross-party supported.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01CU27, HD01CU28 [A1] — legislative text confirmed.
 <em>PIR-3 connection</em>: Monitor register construction progress (2027 implementation) and any implementation delays.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure">Key Judgment KJ-4: The Government's Environmental Credibility Is Under Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure">Key Judgment KJ-4: The Government's Environmental Credibility Is Under Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-4-the-governments-environmental-credibility-is-under-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>MEDIUM confidence</strong> that the simultaneous approval of FiU48 fuel tax cuts (climate-adverse signal) and MJU21 Riksrevisionen criticism of agricultural climate transition support will combine to damage the Tidö coalition's environmental credibility, particularly with C and MP voters. This is partially offset by MJU19 (waste law EU compliance) but not substantially.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD01FiU48, HD01MJU21 [A1] — direct policy conflict; electoral impact MEDIUM [C3].
 <em>PIR-5 connection</em>: Monitor party manifestos for climate commitments ahead of election; MJU21 media coverage.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Inte
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Requirement</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Priority</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1</td><td>What is the opposition's (S) detailed response to FiU48 in Riksdag debate?</td><td>Any S/V/MP official statement on FiU48</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2</td><td>What is the likelihood of KU33 second vote post-election based on coalition formation?</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3</td><td>Is CU28 bostadsrättsregister procurement/IT tender issued on schedule?</td><td>Government order post-election for register system</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4</td><td>What are fuel price levels in September–October 2026 when FiU48 subsidy expires?</td><td>Energy market monitoring</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5</td><td>What does MJU21 full Riksrevisionen report recommend vs. government response?</td><td>Full report publication</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -640,12 +640,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Basis</th><th>Robustness</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Election scheduled September 2026</td><td>Constitutional calendar [A1]</td><td>Very High</td></tr><tr><td>Tidö coalition remains stable through summer 2026</td><td>No current coalition crisis signals [B2]</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 requires second vote from new Riksdag</td><td>Constitutional process confirmed [A1]</td><td>Very High</td></tr><tr><td>S opposes KU33 second vote</td><td>Based on historical S FOI positions [B3]</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>FiU48 fuel subsidy expires as scheduled 30 Sep 2026</td><td>Legislative text confirmed [A1]</td><td>High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-overall-intelligence-confidence">Overall Intelligence Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-intelligence-confidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-overall-intelligence-confidence">Overall Intelligence Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-overall-intelligence-confidence"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH confidence</strong> in factual findings (all 10 documents confirmed from primary sources).
 <strong>MEDIUM confidence</strong> in electoral and political impact predictions.
 <strong>VERY HIGH confidence</strong> in constitutional process analysis (KU33, KU32 vilande mechanics confirmed [A1]).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>SAT Technique used</strong>: Key Judgments method per ICD 203; ACH used in devils-advocate.md to stress-test KJ-1.
 <strong>WEP Summary for KJs</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -656,8 +656,8 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class=
 </ul>
 <p><strong>PIR Standing Review</strong>: All 5 PIRs above feed into the standing PIR framework from osint-tradecraft-standards.md. PIR-1 maps to standing PIR-1 (government stability/electoral intent); PIR-2 maps to standing PIR-2 (legislative agenda continuity); PIR-5 maps to standing PIR-5 (environmental policy implementation).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-criteria">DIW Scoring Criteria<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-criteria"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scoring-criteria">DIW Scoring Criteria<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-criteria"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-criteria">DIW Scoring Criteria<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>5 = Maximum</th><th>1 = Minimum</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>D</strong> — Decision immediacy</td><td>Immediate, irreversible</td><td>Gradual, reversible</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I</strong> — Implementation impact</td><td>National systemic, 1M+ affected</td><td>Local/administrative, &#x3C;1000 affected</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W</strong> — Political weight</td><td>Government-opposition divide, election-defining</td><td>Procedural/bipartisan, no controversy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-scoring-table">Ranked Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-scoring-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-scoring-table">Ranked Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-scoring-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -801,23 +801,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-scoring-table">Ranked Scoring Table<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW</th><th>Tier</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget drivmedelsskatt + energistöd</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD01KU33 — TF vilande: insyn beslag husrannsakan</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>13</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01CU27 — Identitetskrav lagfart + bostadsrättslagen</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU28 — Nationellt bostadsrättsregister</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01KU32 — TF+YGL vilande: tillgänglighetskrav medier</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>11</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01CU22 — Ställföreträdarskap: gode man/förvaltare reform</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>10</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01MJU21 — Riksrevisionen jordbrukets klimatomställning</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01MJU19 — Avfallslagstiftning materialåtervinning</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD01SfU20 — Slopat anmälningskrav föräldrapenning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>L1</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD01TU16 — Slopat krav introduktionsutbildning körning</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>L1</td><td>riksdagen.se [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-rank-diagram">📊 Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-rank-diagram">📊 Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Scores — Committee Reports April 2026"
     x-axis ["HD01FiU48", "HD01KU33", "HD01CU27", "HD01CU28", "HD01KU32", "HD01CU22", "HD01MJU21", "HD01MJU19", "HD01SfU20", "HD01TU16"]
     y-axis "DIW Score (max 15)" 0 --> 15
     bar [15, 13, 12, 12, 11, 10, 9, 9, 6, 6]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>What if FiU48 fiscal impact is larger?</strong> The SEK 4.1bn figure is confirmed from primary source. Even conservative scenarios place the fiscal signal at L2+ — the emergency budget mechanism use alone justifies the highest political weight score regardless of exact amounts.</p>
 <p><strong>What if KU33/KU32 second vote is refused post-election?</strong> The constitutional implications escalate to L3 Intelligence-grade if there is a government change and these amendments are blocked — monitor post-election coalition formation.</p>
 <p><strong>What if CU27/CU28 encounter implementation difficulties?</strong> Register construction for bostadsrätter has been debated for years; the 2027 implementation date gives government time — but delays could become a campaign liability.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology-notes">Scoring Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology-notes">Scoring Methodology Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>DIW weights applied per <code>synthesis-methodology.md</code> Part 1. All documents confirmed via riksdagen.se primary source [A1] — Admiralty source reliability: A (completely reliable). All dok_ids verified via MCP API response at 2026-04-23T04:45Z.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue">Predicted Editorial Frames by Issue<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy">HD01FiU48 — Emergency Budget (Fuel / Energy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue">Predicted Editorial Frames by Issue<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-predicted-editorial-frames-by-issue"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy">HD01FiU48 — Emergency Budget (Fuel / Energy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48--emergency-budget-fuel--energy">HD01FiU48 — Emergency Bud
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Medium type</th><th>Likely primary frame</th><th>Likely secondary frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tabloid (Aftonbladet, Expressen)</td><td>"Folkparti för bilismens vänner" / "Billigare bensin" headline</td><td>Cost-of-living relief; consumer wins</td></tr><tr><td>Broadsheet (DN, SvD)</td><td>Fiscal policy analysis; climate tradeoff question</td><td>Election timing critique</td></tr><tr><td>Local/regional (NT, GP, Sydsvenskan)</td><td>Rural beneficiary stories; local household quotes</td><td>Environmental opposition quotes</td></tr><tr><td>SVT/SR news</td><td>Balance: coalition claim + S/MP response</td><td>Economic expert analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Pro-coalition media (Epoch Times, Nyheter Idag)</td><td>"Government delivers for ordinary Swedes"</td><td>Opposition hypocrisy framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net frame prediction</strong>: Dual-track coverage — economic relief story dominant (reaches ~65% of audience); environmental cost story secondary (~35% of audience). Coalition net benefit: positive, especially among targeted rural/suburban demographic.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Ame
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Medium type</th><th>Likely frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Broadsheet</td><td>Process story: procedural milestone; second-vote timeline</td></tr><tr><td>Tabloid</td><td>Very limited coverage unless opposition declares major resistance</td></tr><tr><td>Academic/political blogs</td><td>FOI implications; digital access; press freedom angle</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag press services</td><td>Neutral procedural reporting</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net frame</strong>: Low salience in mainstream media; high salience in policy/press-freedom community. Does not benefit or hurt coalition significantly in voter terms.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime">CU27/CU28 — Property / Housing Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime">CU27/CU28 — Property / Housing Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cu27cu28--property--housing-anti-crime">CU27/CU28 — Property / Hous
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Medium type</th><th>Likely frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tabloid</td><td>Crime-in-housing story; gang infiltration of bostadsrätter</td></tr><tr><td>Broadsheet</td><td>AML policy; transparency; housing market stability</td></tr><tr><td>Housing industry media</td><td>Technical compliance; registry burden on bostadsrättsföreningar</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net frame</strong>: Crime-reduction narrative resonates with SD/M base. Industry concerns provide opposition angle.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-disinformation-risk-assessment">Disinformation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-disinformation-risk-assessment">Disinformation Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -934,11 +934,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-disinformation-risk-assessment">Disinformation Risk Assessment<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk vector</th><th>Probability</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 misrepresented as permanent subsidy</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Legislation clearly time-limited; fact-check resources available</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 framed as "press censorship"</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>Text clearly expands access; however "vilande" process creates uncertainty window</td></tr><tr><td>CU28 registry framed as "surveillance register"</td><td>LOW</td><td>Register is existing-owner-only; accuracy may reduce concerns</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Media framing is predictive analysis [C3] based on pattern recognition from past Swedish legislative coverage. Actual media response depends on editorial decisions not observable in advance. Confidence: LOW [C4].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Interest</th><th>Power</th><th>Impact</th><th>Position</th><th>Named Actor</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>High — drives all legislation</td><td>High — government majority</td><td>Positive FiU48, CU27/28</td><td>Supportive</td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>High — main opposition</td><td>Medium in current session</td><td>Contested FiU48, supportive CU27/28</td><td>Critical on energy subsidies</td><td>Opposition Leader Magdalena Andersson</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>High — coalition partner, rural voter base benefits from fuel tax cut</td><td>High</td><td>Strongly positive FiU48</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Party leader Jimmie Åkesson</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>High — senior coalition</td><td>High</td><td>Positive housing market reforms</td><td>Supportive</td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>High — fiscal critique</td><td>Low</td><td>Critical FiU48</td><td>Opposed</td><td>Party leader Nooshi Dadgostar</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>High — climate critique</td><td>Low</td><td>Strongly opposed FiU48 fuel cuts</td><td>Strongly opposed</td><td>Party leader Märta Stenevi</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>High — climate + fiscal + rural tension</td><td>Low (outside coalition)</td><td>Mixed: supports rural relief, opposes climate regression</td><td>Ambivalent</td><td>Party leader Muharrem Demirok</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>High — social welfare (CU22)</td><td>Medium</td><td>Positive CU22, CU28</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Party leader Ebba Busch</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank</td><td>Medium — inflation monitoring</td><td>High (independent)</td><td>Concern about FiU48 inflation risk</td><td>Watching</td><td>Governor Erik Thedéen</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Polisen / Åklagarmyndigheten</td><td>Medium — KU33 digital seizures</td><td>Low direct</td><td>Positive KU33</td><td>Supportive</td><td>National Police Commissioner Petra Lundh</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Housing associations (bostadsrättsföreningar)</td><td>Medium — CU28 register burden</td><td>Medium (industry)</td><td>Transition cost; long-term positive</td><td>Mixed</td><td>HSB, Riksbyggen, SBC</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Disability organizations (NGOs)</td><td>High — CU22, KU32 accessibility</td><td>Medium (advocacy)</td><td>Positive CU22, KU32</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Handikappförbunden, DHR</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Journalists / Civil society</td><td>High — KU33 transparency concern</td><td>Medium (public opinion)</td><td>Negative KU33</td><td>Concerned</td><td>Swedish Press Photographers' Association, JO</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>Farming sector (LRF)</td><td>High — FiU48 diesel cuts; MJU21 climate critique</td><td>Medium</td><td>Mixed: fuel relief positive; climate audit negative</td><td>Ambivalent</td><td>LRF (Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Car-dependent households (rural, commuter)</td><td>High — direct FiU48 beneficiaries</td><td>Electoral</td><td>Positive</td><td>Supportive</td><td>Structural — no named actor</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     GOV["Tidö Government&#x3C;br/>Kristersson (M)"]
@@ -1125,11 +1125,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style POLL fill:#37474F,color:#fff
     style NGO fill:#4A148C,color:#fff
     style MEDIA fill:#F57F17,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-neutrality-audit">Neutrality Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-neutrality-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-neutrality-audit">Neutrality Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-neutrality-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>Analysis covers 8 parties + institutional actors. No party systematically advantaged in framing. Positive and negative assessments applied based on primary source evidence [A1] and structural reasoning [B3], not editorial preference. All named actors hold public positions making their views a matter of public record per GDPR Art. 9(2)(e).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon">72-Hour Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-horizon">72-Hour Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon">72-Hour Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-01: FiU48 Riksdag vote</td><td>2026-04-24</td><td>Vote count, party positions</td><td>Confirms coalition unity</td></tr><tr><td>I-02: KU33 Riksdag vote</td><td>2026-04-24</td><td>Vilande adoption formal</td><td>Constitutional process confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>I-03: KU32 Riksdag vote</td><td>2026-04-24</td><td>Vilande adoption formal</td><td>Constitutional process confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>I-04: Party press releases</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>S, V, MP framing of FiU48</td><td>Measures opposition effectiveness</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon">One-Week Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-week-horizon">One-Week Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon">One-Week Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-05: Media polling reaction</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>Novus/Demoskop poll shift</td><td>Energy policy salience</td></tr><tr><td>I-06: Industry response CU28</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>HSB/Riksbyggen statement</td><td>Registry implementation resistance signal</td></tr><tr><td>I-07: IVO comment on CU22</td><td>2026-04-28</td><td>IVO press release</td><td>Supervisory reform signal</td></tr><tr><td>I-08: Riksdag committee follow-up</td><td>2026-04-30</td><td>CU/KU post-decision notes</td><td>Any reconsideration signals</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon">One-Month Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-month-horizon">One-Month Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon">One-Month Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-09: Government proposition on CU22</td><td>2026-05-20</td><td>Government bill for new authority</td><td>Implementation commitment</td></tr><tr><td>I-10: Lantmäteriet CU28 consultation</td><td>2026-05-15</td><td>Lantmäteriet public consultation</td><td>Registry timeline</td></tr><tr><td>I-11: Opposition manifesto energy</td><td>2026-05-01</td><td>S/V/MP climate manifesto</td><td>Counter-narrative strength</td></tr><tr><td>I-12: Riksbank inflation report</td><td>2026-05-15</td><td>Rate decision + forecast</td><td>Coalition economic context</td></tr><tr><td>I-13: SCB housing price data</td><td>2026-05-06</td><td>Swedish housing market indicators</td><td>CU27/CU28 implementation environment</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-cycle-horizon">Election-Cycle Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-cycle-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-cycle-horizon">Election-Cycle Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-cycle-horizon"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1295,10 +1295,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-cycle-horizon">Election-Cycle Horizon<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Date</th><th>Observable sign</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>I-14: Party manifestos published</td><td>2026-07-01</td><td>Constitutional commitment language</td><td>KU33/KU32 second vote commitment</td></tr><tr><td>I-15: Election result Sept 2026</td><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Seat distribution</td><td>Constitutional amendment fate</td></tr><tr><td>I-16: Post-election KU33/KU32 second vote</td><td>2026-11-01</td><td>New Riksdag decision</td><td>Constitutional outcome</td></tr><tr><td>I-17: CU28 registry launched</td><td>2027-06-01</td><td>Lantmäteriet public registry live</td><td>Implementation completion</td></tr><tr><td>I-18: CU22 new authority established</td><td>2027-01-01</td><td>Authority operational</td><td>Guardianship reform completion</td></tr><tr><td>I-19: FiU48 renewable energy investment outcome</td><td>2026-12-31</td><td>Government progress report</td><td>Policy effectiveness</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-note">Confidence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-note">Confidence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-note"></a></h3>
 <p>Indicator dates are derived from legislative timelines stated in KU33/KU32 documentation [A1], government procedural norms [B2], and standard Swedish legislative cycles [B3]. Election date 2026-09-13 is the statutory election Sunday [A1].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-pass-2-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Key milestones matrix</strong>:</p>
 
 
@@ -1333,11 +1333,11 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-pass-2-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context (Pass 2)<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Horizon</th><th>Most critical indicator</th><th>Monitoring method</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>72h</td><td>I-01: FiU48 vote 2026-04-24</td><td>riksdagen.se voteringer API</td></tr><tr><td>1 week</td><td>I-05: Polling reaction 2026-04-28</td><td>Novus/Demoskop public releases</td></tr><tr><td>1 month</td><td>I-12: Riksbank 2026-05-15</td><td>riksbank.se</td></tr><tr><td>Election</td><td>I-15: Election result 2026-09-13</td><td>valmyndigheten.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Collection gap</strong>: No automated trigger monitoring available in current system — all indicators require manual collection. Recommend Agentic Workflow realtime-monitor to watch riksdagen.se for I-01, I-02, I-03 votes.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Three scenarios for how April 2026 committee report decisions shape the Swedish political and legal landscape through election and beyond.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35">Scenario 1 — Continuity: Tidö Re-elected, Full Constitutional Package Confirmed (35%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35">Scenario 1 — Continuity: Tidö Re-elected, Full Constitutional Package Confirmed (35%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-confirmed-35"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The Tidö coalition wins re-election in September 2026. In the autumn session, the new Riksdag passes the second vote on KU33 and KU32. Both TF/YGL amendments enter into force on 1 January 2027. The bostadsrättsregister (CU28) launches on schedule. Fuel prices stabilize as Middle East tensions ease and the temporary fuel tax subsidy expires 30 September 2026 without cliff-edge shock.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Polls showing Alliansen-SD coalition above 50% by August 2026.
 <strong>Signal</strong>: KU committee announcing second-vote scheduling for autumn 2026 session.</p>
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-1--continuity-tidö-re-elected-full-constitutional-package-c
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence basis</strong>: HD01FiU48, HD01KU33, HD01KU32, HD01CU28 [A1]; electoral scenarios [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45">Scenario 2 — Partial Disruption: Government Change, Constitutional Package Blocked (45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45">Scenario 2 — Partial Disruption: Government Change, Constitutional Package Blocked (45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-package-blocked-45"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Social Democrats form government with V support after September 2026 election. New KU committee is constituted with different chairperson. The second vote on KU33 is refused or delayed (S traditionally more protective of offentlighetsprincipen). KU32 (accessibility, EU-driven) likely passes regardless. FiU48 energy support creates a cliff-edge debate — S campaign to make energy support permanent vs. Riksbank warning on inflation. CU28 bostadsrättsregister proceeds (cross-party support).</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: S polling above 30% with credible V/MP support by July 2026.
 <strong>Signal</strong>: S/V joint statement opposing KU33 second vote as transparency regression.</p>
@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-disruption-government-change-constitutional-packa
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence basis</strong>: HD01KU33, HD01KU32 [A1]; electoral analysis [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20">Scenario 3 — Cliff-Edge Energy Crisis: Fuel Tax Subsidy Expiry Shock (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20">Scenario 3 — Cliff-Edge Energy Crisis: Fuel Tax Subsidy Expiry Shock (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: The FiU48 temporary fuel tax cut expires 30 September 2026, coinciding with autumn heating season. If geopolitical factors maintain high energy prices, households face a sudden price jump precisely as election results are being processed and coalition negotiations begin. This creates a political crisis: whoever forms government faces immediate pressure to extend the subsidy (fiscal cost: ~SEK 1.5bn per period), while Riksbank and fiscal hawks argue against.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Energy futures contracts for Q4 2026 showing elevated prices; Middle East conflict escalation signals.
 <strong>Signal</strong>: Riksbank public statement on energy price inflation risk in Sweden; opposition party motions demanding permanent fuel tax cuts.</p>
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-3--cliff-edge-energy-crisis-fuel-tax-subsidy-expiry-shock-20
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence basis</strong>: HD01FiU48 [A1] (subsidy period 1 May–30 Sep 2026); energy market structural analysis [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-probability-summary">Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-probability-summary">Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1407,8 +1407,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-probability-summary">Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Probability</th><th>Sum</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 — Continuity, full package</td><td>35%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S2 — Partial disruption, KU33 blocked</td><td>45%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S3 — Energy cliff-edge crisis</td><td>20%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>100%</strong></td><td>✓</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Dimension</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th><th>Cascade</th><th>Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>Fuel subsidy fuels inflation; Riksbank forced to hold/raise rates longer</td><td>Fiscal-monetary</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>→ R2, R4</td><td>Likely [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>FiU48 fiscal expansion tested against EU fiscal rules (Stability &#x26; Growth Pact)</td><td>EU compliance</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>→ R5</td><td>Unlikely [C4]</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>KU33 second vote refused post-election — TF amendment dies</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>→ R6</td><td>Roughly even [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Opposition frames FiU48 as fiscal irresponsibility; swing voters defect</td><td>Electoral</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>→ R7</td><td>Likely [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>CU28 bostadsrättsregister implementation delayed post-2027</td><td>Administrative</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>isolated</td><td>Unlikely [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>Constitutional package collapse creates legal vacuum for digital investigations</td><td>Legal</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>isolated</td><td>Roughly even [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Climate-minded voters (C, MP support) defect due to FiU48 fuel subsidy</td><td>Electoral</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>→ R1</td><td>Likely [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Riksrevisionen MJU21 critique amplified into government negligence narrative</td><td>Reputational</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>→ R4</td><td>Roughly even [B3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-55-li-matrix">5×5 L×I Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-li-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-55-li-matrix">5×5 L×I Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-li-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk Matrix — Likelihood × Impact (Committee Reports April 2026)
@@ -1523,7 +1523,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-55-li-matrix">5×5 L×I Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
     R8 - Riksrevisionen narrative: [0.35, 0.5]
     R2 - EU fiscal rules: [0.5, 0.35]
     R5 - Register delay: [0.3, 0.3]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Primary chain</strong>: R1 (inflation) → R4 (electoral framing) → R7 (climate voter defection)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>FiU48 fuel tax cut risks Riksbank concern → triggers S/MP criticism → splits rural vs. urban/educated voter coalitions</li>
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Practical impact: Polisen/Åklagarmyndigheten face legal uncertainty in major digital seizure cases</li>
 <li>Severity: MEDIUM — operational legal issue, not a political crisis</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1566,12 +1566,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities">Posterior Probabilities<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Prior</th><th>Conditional update</th><th>Posterior</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksbank publicly critiques FiU48 on inflation</td><td>20%</td><td>+15% if energy prices rise May–June 2026</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td>KU33 second vote passes post-election</td><td>60%</td><td>+20% if Tidö coalition wins; −40% if S wins</td><td>20–80% range</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition fiscal framing dominates campaign</td><td>40%</td><td>+20% if public polling shows household debt rising</td><td>60%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sources">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sources">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources"></a></h3>
 <p>All risk assessments grounded in: HD01FiU48 [A1] (fiscal data); HD01KU33 [A1] (constitutional process); HD01MJU21 [A1] (climate audit); Structural analysis [B3] for electoral impacts.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Responsive fiscal governance</strong>: HD01FiU48 demonstrates Tidö coalition's ability to deploy emergency tools to protect households from energy price shocks; politically effective pre-election signal [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Housing market modernization</strong>: CU27+CU28 close significant anti-money laundering and consumer protection gaps in the Swedish property market, building on Tidö's stated agenda to combat organized crime [HD01CU27, HD01CU28, riksdagen.se]</li>
@@ -1579,28 +1579,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <li><strong>CRPD alignment</strong>: CU22 (ställföreträdarskap reform) demonstrates Sweden's commitment to CRPD obligations, improving trust among disability rights advocates [HD01CU22, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Deregulation signals</strong>: SfU20, TU16 exemplify practical removal of ineffective administrative burdens — demonstrates competent, evidence-based governance [HD01SfU20, HD01TU16, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fiscal credibility risk</strong>: FiU48's SEK 4.1bn budget weakening in an election year may undermine the coalition's credibility on fiscal discipline — a key differentiator from S-led alternatives [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se; fiscal risk based on structural analysis B3]</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional second-vote dependency</strong>: KU33/KU32 remain dormant until post-election second vote — the legislation is constitutionally fragile and dependent on political continuity; any government change could undo both [HD01KU33, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Agricultural climate transition failure</strong>: MJU21 Riksrevisionen audit signals inadequate state support for agriculture's climate shift — a weakness in the government's environmental credibility, especially with C and MP voters [HD01MJU21, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Bostadsrättsregister implementation risk</strong>: CU28's register construction begins 1 January 2027 — post-election; implementation complications would become next government's problem and a campaign accountability issue [HD01CU28, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Election-year tangible delivery</strong>: Seven out of ten measures take effect before or near the September 2026 election — unprecedented wave of tangible legislative delivery creates voter perception of a productive government [HD01FiU48, HD01CU27, HD01CU28, HD01MJU19, HD01SfU20, HD01TU16, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Housing market anti-crime narrative</strong>: CU27's identity/lagfart requirements and bostadsrättsombildning rules play directly into the government's core crime-fighting narrative, popular across partisan divides [HD01CU27, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Digital state modernization</strong>: The constitutional framework changes (KU33, KU32) and the planned e-legitimation (HD01TU21 — not yet adopted) together build a modern digital Sweden narrative [HD01KU33, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Nordic/EU alignment</strong>: MJU19 waste law reform, KU32 accessibility requirements align Sweden with EU policy mainstreams — reduces isolation risk and demonstrates international responsibility [HD01MJU19, HD01KU32, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Opposition fiscal attack surface</strong>: S, V, MP will use FiU48's SEK 4.1bn cost as evidence of irresponsible pre-election spending; Riksbank could provide implicit support for this critique if it comments on inflationary risk [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se; electoral analysis B3]</li>
 <li><strong>Climate backlash on fuel tax cuts</strong>: The drivmedelsskatt cut (FiU48) directly contradicts climate-science consensus on carbon pricing; environmental movement and MP/C will make this a campaign issue; potential EU scrutiny if cuts undercut energy taxation directive minimum levels [HD01FiU48, riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional overreach perception</strong>: KU33's restriction of offentlighetsprincipen in criminal investigations could be framed as erosion of transparency — historically a sensitive issue in Sweden [HD01KU33, riksdagen.se; civil society analysis C3]</li>
 <li><strong>Riksrevisionen agriculture critique</strong>: If MJU21 report receives wide media coverage, it feeds an election narrative of Tidö coalition sacrificing long-term climate goals for short-term rural constituency appeasement [HD01MJU21, riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1622,12 +1622,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td>S-O: Use responsive fiscal governance + housing market delivery as election campaign centrepieces; lead with crime-fighting + household economics narrative</td><td>S-T: Proactively communicate climate transition support via agriculture programs to pre-empt Riksrevisionen criticism; brief Riksbank on FiU48 temporary nature</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td>W-O: Frame CU28 register as phased delivery — first vote wins before election, full implementation follows</td><td>W-T: Address constitutional fragility of KU33/KU32 by seeking cross-party commitments on second vote; reduce exposure if broad support confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h3>
 <p>The most important interference: <strong>FiU48 (Strength: fiscal responsiveness) × MJU21 (Weakness: agriculture climate failure)</strong> — both relate to energy and agriculture. If voters simultaneously receive fuel tax relief AND hear Riksrevisionen criticism of agricultural climate transition support, cognitive dissonance may weaken both messages. The government needs to separate these narratives temporally.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty evidence annotation</strong>: All primary evidence rows cite <code>dok_id</code> from riksdagen.se [A1]. Interpretive rows annotated [B3] or [C3] where inferential.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Taxonomy</th><th>Severity</th><th>Actor</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1: Pre-election fiscal populism erodes budget credibility</td><td>Policy coherence threat</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Government</td><td>HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T2: Constitutional package (KU33/KU32) loses post-election ratification</td><td>Institutional continuity threat</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Parliament</td><td>HD01KU33, HD01KU32 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T3: Offentlighetsprincipen restriction (KU33) challenged by civil society</td><td>Democratic legitimacy threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Civil society, journalists</td><td>HD01KU33 [A1], [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>T4: Money laundering via property market persists despite CU27/CU28</td><td>Crime/organized crime threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Criminal actors</td><td>HD01CU27, HD01CU28 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T5: Agricultural climate transition fails — Sweden misses EU targets</td><td>Environmental governance threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Government, farming lobby</td><td>HD01MJU21 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>T6: Energy price volatility recurs after fuel subsidy period ends (1 Oct 2026)</td><td>Economic stability threat</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Energy markets</td><td>HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism">Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fiscal Populism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism">Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fiscal Populism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#C62828","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#7F0000","lineColor":"#EF9A9A","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     ROOT["T1: Pre-election fiscal expansion undermines budget credibility HD01FiU48"]
@@ -1704,7 +1704,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-threat-t1--fiscal-populism">Attack Tree (Threat T1 — Fi
     style C fill:#E53935,color:#fff
     style D fill:#FF7043,color:#fff
     style E fill:#1565C0,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ttp-analysis-political">TTP Analysis (Political)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ttp-analysis-political"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ttp-analysis-political">TTP Analysis (Political)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ttp-analysis-political"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1741,25 +1741,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-ttp-analysis-political">TTP Analysis (Political)<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP</th><th>Technique</th><th>Tactic</th><th>Impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TTP-01</td><td>Pre-election emergency budget use</td><td>Maximize electoral benefit</td><td>SEK 4.1bn fiscal expansion [HD01FiU48]</td></tr><tr><td>TTP-02</td><td>Vilande grundlagsandring adoption</td><td>Bind incoming parliament</td><td>Post-election lock-in or block [HD01KU33]</td></tr><tr><td>TTP-03</td><td>Residency requirement for ombildning</td><td>Prevent conversion manipulation</td><td>Tenant protection/enforcement [HD01CU27]</td></tr><tr><td>TTP-04</td><td>Digital seizure non-classification</td><td>Protect investigations from FOI</td><td>Reduced transparency [HD01KU33]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario">Post-Election Constitutional Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario">Post-Election Constitutional Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-constitutional-scenario"></a></h3>
 <p>If S forms government in October 2026, the second vote on KU33 (TF) may be refused:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Law enforcement digital investigation framework reverts to pre-2026 uncertainty</li>
 <li>Civil society may paradoxically benefit from transparency perspective</li>
 <li>Tidoe coalition would criticize S for weakening crime-fighting capabilities</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sources-1">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sources-1">Evidence Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <p>All threat assessments grounded in primary documents: HD01FiU48 [A1], HD01KU33 [A1], HD01KU32 [A1], HD01CU27 [A1], HD01MJU21 [A1]. Electoral/political analysis [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu22">HD01CU22<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu22"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01CU22
 <strong>Title</strong>: Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — Major legal guardianship reform affecting vulnerable adults
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved a comprehensive reform of the Swedish ställföreträdarskap (legal guardianship/administratorship) system:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Clearer mandate boundaries for gode män (advisors) and förvaltare (administrators)</li>
@@ -1768,19 +1768,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>National ställföreträdarregister (register) for all appointed representatives</li>
 <li>Most changes: 1 July 2026; register: 1 January 2028</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters"></a></h3>
 <p>The ställföreträdarskap system affects ~100,000+ adults in Sweden who lack legal capacity to fully manage their own affairs (due to cognitive impairment, mental illness, or age-related incapacity). The existing system has faced criticism for quality inconsistency, lack of oversight, and inadequate protection of individuals' autonomy rights. This reform addresses Sweden's obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which Sweden ratified.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01CU22</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU22, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU22">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU22</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu27">HD01CU27<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu27"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01CU27
 <strong>Title</strong>: Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Housing market integrity, anti-crime, property ownership transparency
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1807,7 +1807,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Lagstiftningsärende</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Property law, anti-money laundering, housing market</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Approved (Riksdagen sa ja)</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>New property transfer identity rules: 1 July 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-1">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-1">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Two distinct legislative packages approved:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>
@@ -1817,40 +1817,40 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-1">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <p><strong>Bostadsrättslagen anti-circumvention</strong>: When a housing association converts rental apartments to bostadsrätter, the tenant must have been registered at the address for ≥6 months before the vote to count in the required 2/3 majority threshold. Prevents rapid turnover of residents to facilitate conversions without genuine tenant approval.</p>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-1">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-1">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This reform addresses two distinct but related housing market integrity problems. The identity requirements close an anti-money laundering gap — anonymous property ownership has enabled organized crime asset placement. The 6-month residency requirement for bostadsrättsombildning prevents "straw tenant" schemes where landlords rapidly populate a building with compliant tenants to achieve the 2/3 conversion majority.</p>
 <p>Both measures are politically popular across party lines as anti-crime measures that also protect tenants. They become law on 1 July 2026 — well before the election.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01CU27</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU27, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU27">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU27</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu28">HD01CU28<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu28"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01CU28
 <strong>Title</strong>: Ett register för alla bostadsrätter
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Major housing market infrastructure reform
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-2">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-2">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved creation of a national register for all bostadsrätter (condominium apartments):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Records: apartment details, bostadsrättshavare (title holder), bostadsrättsförening (association), pantsättningar (mortgages/pledges)</li>
 <li>Purpose: Central registry replacing fragmented association records; modern pledging system (registration replaces association notification)</li>
 <li>Timeline: Register construction rules from 1 January 2027; remainder from date set by government</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-2">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-2">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden currently lacks a national register for bostadsrätter — a major gap compared to the fastighetsregister for ordinary real property. This reform modernizes the bostadsrätt market, improves consumer protection, and creates transparent credit information for banks and buyers. The pledge registration shift (away from notifying the association) eliminates a significant legal uncertainty that has caused disputes.</p>
 <p><strong>Election-year timing</strong>: Strong cross-party support expected. Housing market transparency is popular among the large proportion of Swedish households (approx. 750,000+ bostadsrätter nationwide) that own or aspire to own bostadsrätter.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01CU28</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:CU28, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU28</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01FiU48
 <strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget för 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel samt el- och gasprisstöd
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Fiscal policy with immediate household impact and election-year political salience
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1] — Riksdagen primary source, confirmed via API</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-1">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-1">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-1">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (Emergency supplementary budget)</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Fiscal policy, energy taxation, household welfare</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional status</td><td>Ordinary law (not grundlag)</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Approved (Riksdagen sa ja)</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>Fuel tax: 1 May–30 September 2026; Energy support: covers January–February 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal impact</td><td>−SEK 1.56 bn (revenue loss) + SEK 2.4 bn (new expenditure) = SEK 4.1 bn total fiscal weakening</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-3">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-3">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved the government's (Tidö coalition) proposal for an emergency supplementary budget 2026 comprising two fiscal measures:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>
@@ -1896,10 +1896,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-3">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 </li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Justification cited by government</strong>: Middle East conflict impact on fuel prices; high electricity/gas prices during harsh January–February 2026 winter.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-3">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-3">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-3"></a></h3>
 <p>This is a politically significant fiscal intervention just five months before the scheduled September 2026 election. The Tidö coalition (M, SD, KD, L) used the emergency budget mechanism — ordinarily reserved for exceptional circumstances — to deliver direct household price relief. <strong>The timing is strategic</strong>: lower fuel prices and energy support will be visible to voters during the election campaign period.</p>
 <p><strong>Fiscal risk signal</strong>: Weakening the budget balance by SEK 4.1 bn in an election year under existing fiscal constraints will strengthen opposition (S, V, MP) arguments about irresponsible pre-election spending. The Centre Party (C), outside the coalition, has historically opposed fuel tax reductions on climate grounds.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-a1">Stakeholder Impact [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-a1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-a1">Stakeholder Impact [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-a1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1951,27 +1951,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-a1">Stakeholder Impact [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Impact</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Households with cars (petrol/diesel users)</td><td>Positive — lower fuel costs from 1 May 2026</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Households: electricity/gas users Jan–Feb 2026</td><td>Positive — retroactive support payment</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Tidö coalition (M, SD, KD, L)</td><td>Positive electoral boost — visible pre-election relief</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>Contested — S has supported energy support but opposed structural fuel tax cuts</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Centre Party (C)</td><td>Negative alignment — C climate policy opposes fuel tax reductions</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>Strongly opposed on climate grounds</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>State finances</td><td>Negative — SEK 4.1 bn weakening of financial sparande 2026</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Transport sector (haulage, agriculture)</td><td>Positive — diesel reduction significant for commercial operations</td><td>MEDIUM [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-connection-2026">Electoral Connection (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-connection-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-connection-2026">Electoral Connection (2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-connection-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>This measure will dominate for the next five months of election campaign. Fuel prices are a high-salience kitchen-table issue, especially in rural and suburban Sweden where car dependency is high. The SD party, whose voters over-index in rural areas and among manual workers, gains particular electoral benefit. This is a pre-election fiscal stimulus that risks inflationary pressure and clashes with Riksbank's continued tight monetary stance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-a1">Confidence Assessment [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-a1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-a1">Confidence Assessment [A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-a1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Decision approved: VERY HIGH confidence — confirmed via riksdagen.se</li>
 <li>Fiscal figures SEK 1.56bn + SEK 2.4bn: VERY HIGH — from government budget proposition text as summarized</li>
 <li>Electoral impact analysis: MEDIUM — based on public polling trends, structural analysis</li>
 <li>Opposition response: MEDIUM — based on known party positions, not direct quote from this debate</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-source-chain">Source Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-chain">Source Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-chain"></a></h3>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01FiU48</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:FiU48, datum 2026-04-21 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku32">HD01KU32<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku32"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01KU32
 <strong>Title</strong>: Tillgänglighetskrav för vissa medier
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — Constitutional amendment enabling EU accessibility compliance for media/digital products
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-2">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-2">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-2">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Vilande grundlagsändring (TF + YGL)</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Constitutional law, media freedom, disability accessibility, EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional status</td><td>TF + Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen (YGL) amendments — FIRST of two required votes</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Adopted as vilande</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>1 January 2027 (contingent on post-election second vote)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-4">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-4">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen adopted (as vilande) amendments to both Tryckfrihetsförordningen and Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen enabling accessibility requirements to be imposed on constitutionally protected media products:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Expands scope for product information requirements on packaging and labelling</li>
@@ -2010,19 +2010,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-4">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Allows carriage obligations for accessibility services (captioning, interpretation) from non-public-service broadcasters</li>
 <li>Purpose: Disability accessibility compliance + EU membership obligations</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-4">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-4">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's constitutional press/speech freedoms have historically created tensions with EU digital single market legislation. This amendment resolves a key legal gap by allowing ordinary law to require accessibility features even on constitutionally protected products. The political debate balances disability rights advocates (supportive) against media freedom purists (cautious). This is also required by EU law — delay could create infringement proceedings.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01KU32</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:KU32, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU32</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01ku33">HD01KU33<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01ku33"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01KU33
 <strong>Title</strong>: Insyn i handlingar som inhämtas genom beslag och kopiering vid husrannsakan
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-17
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2+ Priority — Constitutional law, fundamental rights (offentlighetsprincipen vs. criminal investigation effectiveness)
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-classification-3">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-classification-3">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-classification-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-classification-3">Document Classification<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Vilande grundlagsändring (Dormant constitutional amendment — TF)</td></tr><tr><td>Policy domain</td><td>Constitutional law, freedom of information (offentlighetsprincipen), criminal investigation powers</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional status</td><td>Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) amendment — FIRST of two required votes</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdag decision</td><td>Adopted as vilande (Riksdagen sa ja till att som vilande anta)</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation date</td><td>1 January 2027 (contingent on second vote after 2026 election)</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal impact</td><td>None direct</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-5">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-5">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen adopted (as vilande/dormant) a government proposal amending Tryckfrihetsförordningen (TF) to restrict public access to digital materials seized or copied during police searches (husrannsakan). Under the proposed rule:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Digital recordings seized/copied in criminal investigations will <strong>not</strong> be classified as public documents (allmänna handlingar)</li>
@@ -2065,11 +2065,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-5">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Exception maintained: if the material is later incorporated into a criminal investigation file, it regains public document status</li>
 <li>Since this is a grundlagsändring (constitutional amendment), it requires TWO identical Riksdag votes with a Riksdag election between them — this April 2026 vote is the FIRST; the second must come after the September 2026 election</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-5">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-5">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Constitutional significance</strong>: TF amendments are among the most significant legislative acts possible in Sweden. The offentlighetsprincipen (principle of public access) is a cornerstone of Swedish democracy, dating to 1766. Restricting access — even temporarily during criminal investigations — is a major policy choice requiring extraordinary process.</p>
 <p><strong>Crime-fighting vs. transparency trade-off</strong>: The government justification emphasizes effectiveness of criminal investigations and digital privacy of third parties caught in searches. Critics may argue this weakens accountability transparency for individuals whose data was seized but who were not charged.</p>
 <p><strong>Post-election lock-in</strong>: The dormant adoption means the incoming Riksdag after September 2026 must confirm this change. If the political balance shifts (e.g., if S forms government), the second vote could be refused — effectively killing the amendment. This creates electoral stakes around constitutional law.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact">Stakeholder Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Impact</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Law enforcement (Polisen, Åklagarmyndigheten)</td><td>Positive — clearer legal footing for digital seizures</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal suspects/third parties</td><td>Mixed — digital privacy protected but transparency reduced</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Journalists/civil society</td><td>Concern — reduced offentlighet in investigative phase</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Government (Tidö coalition)</td><td>Supports — framed as crime-fighting measure</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Post-election Riksdag</td><td>Critical actor — must adopt second vote to make permanent</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Decision adopted as vilande: VERY HIGH [A1]</li>
 <li>Implementation contingent on post-election second vote: VERY HIGH [A1]</li>
@@ -2115,14 +2115,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01KU33</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:KU33, datum 2026-04-17 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01KU33</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01mju19">HD01MJU19<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju19"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01MJU19
 <strong>Title</strong>: Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Miljö- och jordbruksutskottet (MJU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-16
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — EU circular economy compliance, waste legislation reform
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-6">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-6">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved amendments to multiple environmental laws to reduce waste and increase material recycling:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Clearer rules on waste responsibility (when it begins, when it ends)</li>
@@ -2131,12 +2131,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-6">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Removal of requirement for state/municipal entities to post financial security for landfill operations</li>
 <li>Entry into force: 1 July 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-6">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-6">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-6"></a></h3>
 <p>This reform implements EU waste framework directive obligations and contributes to Sweden's circular economy transition. The removal of state/municipal financial security requirements is a practical simplification. Clearer waste responsibility rules reduce legal uncertainty for businesses and municipalities. The timing with 1 July 2026 implementation aligns with broader pre-election regulatory modernization.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01MJU19</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:MJU19, datum 2026-04-16 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU19">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU19</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21">HD01MJU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01mju21"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01MJU21
 <strong>Title</strong>: Riksrevisionens rapport om statens insatser för jordbrukets klimatomställning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Miljö- och jordbruksutskottet (MJU)
@@ -2144,22 +2144,22 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01mju21">HD01MJU21<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L2 Strategic — Riksrevisionen critical audit of agricultural climate transition policy
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]
 <strong>Data Depth</strong>: METADATA-ONLY (no summary available in API response)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-7">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-7">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen considered Riksrevisionen's report on the state's efforts to support agriculture's climate transition. No full summary available in API; based on metadata and Riksrevisionen standard audit format: the report critically assesses whether government programs effectively support agricultural sector decarbonization, and whether targets under Sweden's climate framework are being met.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-7">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-7">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksrevisionen audits trigger parliamentary scrutiny of government program effectiveness. Agricultural climate transition is politically contentious: the Tidö coalition has been perceived as less ambitious on climate than previous S-led government. An audit finding inadequate state support for agricultural climate transition would be politically damaging for the government. The MJU committee would need to respond to Riksrevisionen's recommendations.</p>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: Full analysis limited by metadata-only retrieval. Further detail would require full text access.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01MJU21</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:MJU21, datum 2026-04-20 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU21">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01MJU21</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu20">HD01SfU20<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu20"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01SfU20
 <strong>Title</strong>: Ett slopat krav på anmälan före ansökan om föräldrapenning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-16
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L1 Surface — Administrative simplification, social insurance
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-8">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-8">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved removing the requirement to pre-notify (anmäla) before applying for föräldrapenning (parental benefit):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Eliminates bureaucratic pre-notification step</li>
@@ -2167,37 +2167,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-8">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li>Technical corrections to socialförsäkringsbalken for alignment with current legislation</li>
 <li>Implementation: Removal of notification requirement 1 July 2026; other corrections 31 May 2026 (retroactive to 1 Jan 2026)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-8">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-8">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-8"></a></h3>
 <p>A clear administrative simplification with broad political support. Forsäkringskassan noted the existing notification requirement no longer serves a control function. Benefits families by reducing bureaucratic burden. Relatively low political salience but exemplifies the government's stated deregulation agenda. Before election, such small welfare improvements help demonstrate competent administration.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01SfU20</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:SfU20, datum 2026-04-16 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU20">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU20</a></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01tu16">HD01TU16<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01tu16"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Dok ID</strong>: HD01TU16
 <strong>Title</strong>: Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Trafikutskottet (TU)
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-21
 <strong>DIW Tier</strong>: L1 Surface — Road safety regulation, driving license reform
 <strong>Admiralty Source Code</strong>: [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-of-decision-9">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-of-decision-9">Summary of Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-of-decision-9"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksdagen approved removal of the compulsory introductory course (introduktionsutbildning) for supervised driving practice (övningskörning) for B-licence:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Course has been mandatory since 2006 for both learner drivers and supervisors</li>
 <li>Removal justified by lack of evidence of intended effectiveness in improving practice quality</li>
 <li>Change takes effect 1 August 2026</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-why-it-matters-9">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-it-matters-9">Why It Matters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-it-matters-9"></a></h3>
 <p>This deregulation removes a requirement that many families found an unnecessary administrative and cost burden. Traffic safety authorities may have mixed views, but the government's assessment is that the course did not achieve its stated goals. The measure has bipartisan appeal as a common-sense deregulation — reduces cost for young drivers and their families.</p>
 <p>Primary: <code>HD01TU16</code> — Riksdagen betänkande 2025/26:TU16, datum 2026-04-21 [A1]
 URL: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU16">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU16</a></p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Methodology</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/electoral-domain-methodology.md</code>
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Election</strong>: Swedish general election, September 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden holds its next general election in September 2026 under the current 4-year electoral cycle (last election September 2022). The April 2026 committee reports batch represents the spring legislative sprint — five months before election day.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-by-document">Electoral Impact by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-by-document"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-impact-by-document">Electoral Impact by Document<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-impact-by-document"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Electoral Impact: Voter Groups vs. Election Salience
@@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-impact-by-document">Electoral Impact by Document<a class=""
     KU22-Guardianship: [0.4, 0.2]
     MJU19-Waste Law: [0.2, 0.1]
     TU16-Driving Course: [0.3, 0.5]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-delta">Seat Projection Delta<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-delta"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-delta">Seat Projection Delta<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-delta"></a></h3>
 <p>Current seat distribution (est. post-2022):</p>
 
 
@@ -2235,7 +2235,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-delta">Seat Projection Delta<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Block</th><th>Approx seats</th><th>Change signal from April 2026</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L)</td><td>176</td><td>FiU48 may +3–5 seats in rural/suburban Sweden; climate risk −1–2 educated urban</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition (S+V+MP+C)</td><td>173</td><td>FiU48 gives S energy policy attack surface; MJU21 aids MP/C climate argument</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Net projection impact: <strong>Marginally positive for coalition</strong> on current evidence, driven by household economics salience (FiU48) outweighing climate concerns (MJU21). However, margin is within polling noise — confidence LOW [C4].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-voter-segments-affected">Key Voter Segments Affected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segments-affected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-voter-segments-affected">Key Voter Segments Affected<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segments-affected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2278,9 +2278,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-voter-segments-affected">Key Voter Segments Affected<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size (est.)</th><th>Decision Impact</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Car-dependent rural households</td><td>~1.2M voters</td><td>HIGH</td><td>+Coalition (FiU48 fuel relief)</td></tr><tr><td>Housing-market investors/owners</td><td>~750,000 bostadsrätter</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>+Coalition (CU27/CU28 stability)</td></tr><tr><td>Urban educated (climate voters)</td><td>~900,000</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>−Coalition (FiU48 climate signal)</td></tr><tr><td>Elderly/guardianship affected</td><td>~100,000 adults + families</td><td>LOW</td><td>Neutral (CU22 cross-party)</td></tr><tr><td>Young drivers (18–25)</td><td>~400,000</td><td>LOW</td><td>Slightly positive (TU16 deregulation)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics-context">Coalition Mathematics Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-mathematics-context">Coalition Mathematics Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics-context"></a></h3>
 <p>Constitutional amendments (KU33/KU32) require post-election confirmation — this creates a unique electoral dynamic where the constitutional reform agenda itself becomes a campaign issue. Parties must now campaign on whether they will ratify the second vote.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-triggers">Forward Electoral Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-electoral-triggers">Forward Electoral Triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-triggers"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>July 2026</strong>: Party manifestos published — will all parties commit to KU33/KU32 second vote?</li>
 <li><strong>August 2026</strong>: Final Riksbank assessment before election — any inflation signal will hurt coalition</li>
@@ -2289,8 +2289,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-triggers">Forward Electoral Triggers<a class="" ari
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Overall assessment</strong>: The April 2026 legislative sprint has placed the Tidö coalition in a favorable but not decisive pre-election position. FiU48 is the most potent tool — but fiscal and climate narratives will contest its effectiveness. Confidence: MEDIUM [B3].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result">Current Seat Distribution (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result">Current Seat Distribution (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2364,7 +2364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-2022-election-result">Current Seat Distribu
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Block</th><th>Seats</th><th>Share</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>73</td><td>20.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>68</td><td>19.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Socialdemokraterna (S)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>107</td><td>30.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>24</td><td>6.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>24</td><td>6.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>19</td><td>5.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Liberalerna (L)</td><td>Tidö</td><td>16</td><td>4.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>18</td><td>5.1%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>49.4%</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition total</strong></td><td></td><td><strong>173</strong></td><td><strong>48.8%</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Source: valmyndigheten.se election 2022 [A1 equivalent]</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments">Pivotal Vote Analysis for Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments">Pivotal Vote Analysis for Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments"></a></h3>
 <p>For KU33 and KU32 to pass the <strong>second vote</strong> in the post-election Riksdag:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Required: Absolute majority in new Riksdag (175+ seats of 349)</li>
@@ -2408,18 +2408,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-analysis-for-constitutional-amendments">Pivotal Vote Ana
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>KU33 Pass?</th><th>KU32 Pass?</th><th>Coalition basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö re-elected</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Same coalition votes same</td></tr><tr><td>S minority + V</td><td>Nej (likely)</td><td>Ja (likely)</td><td>S opposes KU33 on FOI grounds</td></tr><tr><td>S + M grand coalition</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Grand coalition rare but possible</td></tr><tr><td>S + C + MP</td><td>Nej</td><td>Ja</td><td>Environmental parties oppose KU33</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis">Sainte-Laguë Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis">Sainte-Laguë Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>Seat distribution is sensitive to minor parties near the 4% threshold. Featherstone scenarios:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>If MP falls below 4%: seats redistribute; likely benefits S or C; opposition loses 18 seats net</li>
 <li>If Nydemokraterna or other small party enters above 4%: could shift balance</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Current April 2026 polls suggest both major blocks remain near 50/50 with election outcome highly uncertain. The April 2026 legislative sprint (FiU48 energy support) is a deliberate attempt to move this balance.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Seat numbers from official 2022 election [A1]. Polling projections for 2026 based on structural analysis [B3]. Constitutional second-vote mechanics confirmed from KU33/KU32 text [A1].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-demographic-segmentation">Demographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segmentation"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-demographic-segmentation">Demographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segmentation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2489,7 +2489,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-demographic-segmentation">Demographic Segmentation<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Estimated size</th><th>Primary concern</th><th>Relevance to this batch</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural car-dependent households</td><td>~1.2M voters</td><td>Transport costs, energy</td><td>FiU48 (HD01FiU48) direct relief</td><td>+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Urban professional commuters</td><td>~800,000</td><td>Housing affordability, crime</td><td>CU27/CU28 property reforms</td><td>+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Housing cooperative owners</td><td>~1.5M (bostadsrättsägare)</td><td>Market transparency, values</td><td>CU28 register, CU27 security</td><td>+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Climate-prioritizing voters</td><td>~700,000</td><td>Climate policy, green transition</td><td>FiU48 negative; MJU21 negative</td><td>−Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Disability community + families</td><td>~300,000</td><td>Accessibility, CRPD compliance</td><td>CU22 (guardianship reform)</td><td>Neutral/+Coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Elderly and vulnerable adults</td><td>~600,000</td><td>Welfare, guardianship quality</td><td>CU22 (ställföreträdarskap)</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>Farming sector</td><td>~80,000 workers</td><td>Rural subsidies, climate</td><td>MJU21 (Riksrevisionen critique), FiU48 diesel</td><td>Mixed</td></tr><tr><td>Young adults (18–30)</td><td>~900,000</td><td>Housing, employment</td><td>CU28 (future homebuyers), TU16</td><td>+Coalition mild</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-segmentation">Regional Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segmentation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-segmentation">Regional Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segmentation"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2521,17 +2521,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-segmentation">Regional Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Region type</th><th>Primary driver</th><th>April 2026 relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Norrland (north)</td><td>Energy costs, rural services</td><td>FiU48 very high salience (high fuel dependency)</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm metropolitan</td><td>Housing market, crime</td><td>CU27/CU28 very high salience</td></tr><tr><td>Gothenburg/Malmö</td><td>Manufacturing, crime, energy</td><td>FiU48 moderate; CU27 moderate</td></tr><tr><td>Smaland/rural south</td><td>Farming, car dependency</td><td>FiU48 high; MJU21 negative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues">Baseline Positions on Key Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues">Baseline Positions on Key Issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-key-issues"></a></h3>
 <p>For a "procedural day" baseline (no specific legislation): rural Sweden = SD/M stronghold; urban educated = MP/S/C stronghold. The April 2026 batch reinforces these patterns — FiU48 advantages SD/M rural support while climate costs continue to disadvantage them with urban educated.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Segmentation estimates based on SCB population data [B2] and Swedish Election Research Program (VALU) typical voter distribution [B3]. Size estimates are approximations; directional signals are more reliable than exact numbers.</p>
 <p>Evidence basis: HD01FiU48 [A1], HD01CU27/28 [A1], HD01CU22 [A1], HD01MJU21 [A1]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Norway (NO), Denmark (DK), Finland (FI) — Nordic baseline; Germany (DE) — EU major economy energy policy comparator; European Union level — constitutional accessibility obligations</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2587,12 +2587,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Measure</th><th>Analogous Policy</th><th>Similarity Score</th><th>Key Difference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Norway (NO)</td><td>FiU48 — fuel tax cut</td><td>NO: Fuel subsidies during energy crisis 2022–23 (petrol/diesel tax relief)</td><td>8/10 — same mechanism, same electoral motivations</td><td>NO subsidies were temporary and targeted; SE cut less generous but EU-minimum constrained</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark (DK)</td><td>FiU48 — energy support</td><td>DK: Varmechecks 2022 (heating support for low-income households)</td><td>6/10 — similar household energy support</td><td>DK more targeted (means-tested); SE universal</td></tr><tr><td>Finland (FI)</td><td>CU22 — guardianship reform</td><td>FI: Laki edunvalvonnasta 1999 (now reformed 2022)</td><td>7/10 — similar reform trajectory, CRPD pressure</td><td>FI reformed earlier; SE now aligning; FI has electronic records since 2020</td></tr><tr><td>Germany (DE)</td><td>FiU48 — fuel subsidy</td><td>DE: Tankrabatt 2022 (90-day fuel tax cut during energy crisis)</td><td>9/10 — almost identical mechanism</td><td>DE limited to 3 months; SE limited to 5 months; both temporary; both politically motivated</td></tr><tr><td>EU level</td><td>KU32 — accessibility for media</td><td>EU: European Accessibility Act (EAA) Directive 2019/882</td><td>Direct transposition</td><td>SE constitutional protection required extraordinary process (vilande); other MS implemented directly</td></tr><tr><td>EU level</td><td>MJU19 — waste reform</td><td>EU: Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC (revised 2018)</td><td>Direct transposition</td><td>SE late implementation (2026 vs. 2018/2022 deadline)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se">What Sweden can learn from Germany's Tankrabatt (DE → SE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se">What Sweden can learn from Germany's Tankrabatt (DE → SE)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-sweden-can-learn-from-germanys-tankrabatt-de--se"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's 2022 Tankrabatt lasted 90 days, cost ~€3.1bn, was fiercely contested by environmental groups, and was not renewed. Sweden's FiU48 fuel cut runs 153 days (1 May–30 Sep 2026) at ~SEK 1.5bn revenue loss — similar proportional cost. <strong>German lesson</strong>: The subsidy boosted German election-year approval for the governing coalition (SPD-led) but delivered marginal inflation impact and was criticized by Bundesbank as market-distorting. Sweden should note: Riksbank has an independent mandate and may similarly signal concern. DE experience suggests subsidy expires cleanly if political will holds — but pre-election extensions are tempting (DE did not extend; risk that SE may).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law">Norway's experience with constitutional-level media law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law">Norway's experience with constitutional-level media law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-norways-experience-with-constitutional-level-media-law"></a></h4>
 <p>Norway revised its Grunnloven (constitution) in 2014–2016 to better accommodate EU media regulation, using a similar two-vote process. <strong>Norwegian lesson</strong>: The Norwegian constitutional amendments took three years from first to second vote (vs. Sweden's planned 6-month turnaround driven by election cycle). Constitutional speed in Sweden is driven by election scheduling rather than deliberation quality — a procedural risk if legal tensions emerge between KU33 and existing JO/HD jurisprudence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-4">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-4">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Comparative fiscal measures (FiU48 vs. NO/DE): HIGH [B2] — based on public data from NO/DE treasury announcements</li>
 <li>Constitutional comparisons: MEDIUM [B3] — based on general knowledge of Nordic constitutional processes</li>
@@ -2600,23 +2600,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-4">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Comparator rows</strong>: 6 (meets minimum 2 requirement per gate check)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process">Primary Parallel: 1994 TF Constitutional Reform Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process">Primary Parallel: 1994 TF Constitutional Reform Process<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-1994-tf-constitutional-reform-process"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: KU33/KU32 — vilande constitutional amendments on TF and YGL</p>
 <p>The 1994 Fundamental Law (TF) reforms followed an identical two-Riksdag procedure under RF 8:14. The key precedent: the <strong>1991–1994 constitutional cycle</strong> where Riksdag dissolved in September 1991, new Riksdag elected, and the second vote on the then-pending reform passed in spring 1994 with cross-party support.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: When constitutional amendments align with broad modernization narratives (digital era access to public documents), they typically survive election transitions even when the sponsoring government changes. Confidence: MEDIUM [B2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022">Secondary Parallel: Energy Price Crisis Response 2021–2022<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022">Secondary Parallel: Energy Price Crisis Response 2021–2022<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-energy-price-crisis-response-20212022"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: HD01FiU48 — SEK 4.1bn emergency energy/fuel budget amendment</p>
 <p>Sweden enacted emergency household energy support in Q4 2021 and Q1 2022 under the Andersson (S) government, including fuel subsidy equivalents. The 2022 autumn election featured energy costs prominently; SD and M leveraged the issue effectively, contributing to their 2022 victory.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: Emergency fuel/energy support packages immediately before elections have significant polling effect in Sweden — particularly in rural constituencies. FiU48 replicates this strategy from the government side, not opposition side. [B3]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022">Tertiary Parallel: Anti-Money-Laundering Property Reforms (2018–2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022">Tertiary Parallel: Anti-Money-Laundering Property Reforms (2018–2022)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-anti-money-laundering-property-reforms-20182022"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: HD01CU27/CU28 — AML property safeguards</p>
 <p>Following FATF's 2017 evaluation that rated Sweden's real estate AML compliance as "partially compliant," Sweden undertook successive legislative improvements. The CU27/CU28 batch continues this multi-cycle reform.</p>
 <p><strong>Precedent</strong>: Similar multi-cycle AML reforms in Denmark (2018) and Finland (2020) took 3–4 years to fully implement and faced industry resistance at each stage. Swedish reforms track the Nordic pattern closely.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017">Quaternary Parallel: Guardianship Reform Process 2011–2017<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017">Quaternary Parallel: Guardianship Reform Process 2011–2017<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-quaternary-parallel-guardianship-reform-process-20112017"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Parallel document</strong>: HD01CU22 — Ställföreträdarskap reform</p>
 <p>Sweden's 2011 Föräldrabalken guardianship reforms also proceeded incrementally over multiple sessions. The current CU22 reform represents a third generation of reform (2011 → 2017 → 2026 trajectory), each adding CRPD compliance layers. This incremental pattern suggests continued reform in 2027–2028 regardless of which government takes office.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-matrix">Confidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-matrix">Confidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2654,8 +2654,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-matrix">Confidence Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parallel</th><th>Recency</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1994 TF reform</td><td>32 years</td><td>Direct legislative precedent [A1]</td><td>MEDIUM [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>2022 energy election</td><td>4 years</td><td>Electoral outcome data [A1]</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic AML cycle</td><td>4-8 years</td><td>Comparative national data [B2]</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Guardianship reform</td><td>9 years</td><td>Swedish statute history [A1]</td><td>HIGH [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-scorecard">Feasibility Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-scorecard"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-scorecard">Feasibility Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-scorecard"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-scorecard">Feasibility Scorecard<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Implementation type</th><th>Risk level</th><th>Key bottleneck</th><th>Feasibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Legislative + regulatory (tax rules)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Existing Skatteverket infrastructure</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Constitutional second vote</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Post-election Riksdag composition</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional second vote</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Same as KU33</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Brottsbalken amendment (property sanctions)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Courts/prosecution capacity</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>IT registry (bostadsrätter)</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>IT system build, LB/HSB compliance</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU22</td><td>New myndighet (guardianship oversight)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Funding, staffing, IVO redesign</td><td>MEDIUM-LOW</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU21</td><td>Agricultural/climate monitoring</td><td>LOW</td><td>Existing JV/SBA infrastructure</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Waste law amendment</td><td>LOW</td><td>Industry compliance</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Civil preparedness update</td><td>LOW</td><td>Existing MSB infrastructure</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU16</td><td>Driver education deregulation</td><td>LOW</td><td>Transport agency rule update</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-path-analysis">Critical Path Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system">CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister IT System<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-path-analysis">Critical Path Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system">CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister IT System<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system"></a></h4>
 <p>Most complex single implementation item. Sweden's existing property registries are managed by Lantmäteriet; integrating bostadsrätt ownership is novel. Risks:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>GDPR-compliant data architecture required (personal data + ownership records)</li>
@@ -2749,7 +2749,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cu28--bostadsrättsregister-it-system">CU28 — Bostadsrättsregister
 <li>Target implementation date per government: Q2 2027 (post-election)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Feasibility assessment</strong>: MEDIUM — technically achievable but procurement and compliance delays likely push full implementation to 2027–2028.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet">CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet">CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet"></a></h4>
 <p>Creating a new oversight authority requires:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Government proposition 2026/27 (next parliament)</li>
@@ -2758,9 +2758,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-cu22--new-supervisory-myndighet">CU22 — New Supervisory Myndighet<a
 <li>IVO role redesign to avoid overlap</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Feasibility assessment</strong>: LOW in the immediate term; MEDIUM over 2027–2028 horizon. Likely requires next government commitment regardless of election outcome.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1">KU33/KU32 — Constitutional Amendments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ku33ku32--constitutional-amendments-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Purely procedural; no administration required. The second vote is a Riksdag decision, not an executive implementation task. Risk is political (election outcome) not administrative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-resource-requirements-summary">Resource Requirements Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-resource-requirements-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-resource-requirements-summary">Resource Requirements Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-resource-requirements-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2799,9 +2799,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-resource-requirements-summary">Resource Requirements Summary<a class=
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Resource type</th><th>High demand items</th><th>Estimated cost</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>IT investment</td><td>CU28 registry</td><td>SEK 150–300M (estimate)</td></tr><tr><td>Staffing</td><td>CU22 new authority</td><td>SEK 80–120M/year</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal</td><td>FiU48 energy support</td><td>SEK 4.1bn (per legislation)</td></tr><tr><td>Court capacity</td><td>CU27 new offences</td><td>Marginal increase</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td>TU16, MJU19</td><td>Low (rule update only)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Confidence: Implementation cost estimates are structural [B3]; IT cost estimates are high-uncertainty [C4].</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management">Hypothesis H1: FiU48 is Primarily About Electoral Strategy, Not Genuine Crisis Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management">Hypothesis H1: FiU48 is Primarily About Electoral Strategy, Not Genuine Crisis Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine-crisis-management"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The emergency budget mechanism is being misused for electoral purposes — the "extraordinary circumstances" threshold for extra ändringsbudget is not genuinely met; Middle East conflict and winter energy prices would have normalized without intervention.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H1</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2817,7 +2817,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-fiu48-is-primarily-about-electoral-strategy-not-genuine
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Score</strong>: Hypothesis H1 is <strong>LIKELY consistent</strong> with evidence — the timing correlation is strong, though genuine crisis elements also exist. Most accurate characterization: crisis-and-electoral motivations are both present.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen">Hypothesis H2: KU33 (TF Digital Seizure Amendment) is a Disproportionate Restriction on Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen">Hypothesis H2: KU33 (TF Digital Seizure Amendment) is a Disproportionate Restriction on Offentlighetsprincipen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate-restriction-on-offentlighetsprincipen"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The proposed TF amendment restricting public access to seized digital materials goes further than law enforcement operational need requires and systematically reduces transparency in criminal investigations in ways that could protect government officials from accountability.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H2</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2833,7 +2833,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-ku33-tf-digital-seizure-amendment-is-a-disproportionate
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Score</strong>: H2 is <strong>POSSIBLY consistent</strong> with evidence — there are legitimate civil society concerns but the hypothesis of deliberate governmental accountability shield overstates the likely intent. The operational law enforcement argument is substantial.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering">Hypothesis H3: CU27/CU28 Housing Reforms Will Not Significantly Reduce Money Laundering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering">Hypothesis H3: CU27/CU28 Housing Reforms Will Not Significantly Reduce Money Laundering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-money-laundering"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The property identity requirements (CU27) and bostadsrättsregister (CU28) address surface-level transparency but do not target the sophisticated layering structures used by organized crime networks, which use legitimate legal entities to obscure ultimate beneficial ownership.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for H3</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2849,7 +2849,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-cu27cu28-housing-reforms-will-not-significantly-reduce-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Score</strong>: H3 is <strong>LIKELY consistent</strong> — CU27/CU28 are genuine improvements but will not substantially disrupt sophisticated money laundering operations. Useful as incremental improvement, not systemic solution. Further AMLD implementation would be needed for comprehensive effect.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Challenge to lead finding</strong>: The dominant intelligence picture frames FiU48 as the most significant decision. A red team analyst might argue that <strong>KU33 is actually more consequential long-term</strong> because:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Constitutional amendments are extremely hard to reverse (unlike budget measures)</li>
@@ -2857,7 +2857,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li>The electoral impact of FiU48 is 5 months; the constitutional impact of KU33 is indefinite</li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Red team conclusion</strong>: Both FiU48 (high short-term electoral significance) and KU33 (high long-term constitutional significance) deserve P0 treatment. The framing of FiU48 as "lead story" is justified for election-year purposes but understates the structural importance of KU33.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2881,8 +2881,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Alternative</th><th>Reason Rejected</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 will cause sustained inflation (3%+)</td><td>ECB/Riksbank tools exist; 5-month fuel subsidy too short-term to cause structural inflation</td></tr><tr><td>CU22 guardian reform will be politically controversial</td><td>Cross-party support expected; no evidence of partisan opposition; CRPD alignment creates broad consensus</td></tr><tr><td>MJU19 waste reform will face industry opposition</td><td>EU-mandate driven; major industry players already aligned; implementation practical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2993,7 +2993,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD01FiU48</th><th>HD01KU33</th><th>HD01KU32</th><th>HD01CU27</th><th>HD01CU28</th><th>HD01CU22</th><th>HD01MJU21</th><th>HD01MJU19</th><th>HD01SfU20</th><th>HD01TU16</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1. Political temperature</strong></td><td>Hot (5)</td><td>Hot (4)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Warm (3)</td><td>Neutral (2)</td><td>Neutral (2)</td><td>Neutral (2)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2. Partisan alignment</strong></td><td>Coalition-driven</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Cross-party</td><td>Government scrutiny</td><td>EU-driven</td><td>Administrative</td><td>Administrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>3. Timeline urgency</strong></td><td>Immediate (5)</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Pre-election</td><td>Ongoing</td><td>EU compliance</td><td>Administrative</td><td>Administrative</td></tr><tr><td><strong>4. Scope</strong></td><td>National fiscal</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Constitutional</td><td>Property market</td><td>Property market</td><td>Social welfare</td><td>Agricultural</td><td>Environmental</td><td>Social insurance</td><td>Road safety</td></tr><tr><td><strong>5. Reversibility</strong></td><td>Low (election-year)</td><td>Very Low (grundlag)</td><td>Very Low (grundlag)</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td>Low</td><td>N/A (audit)</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>6. EU dimension</strong></td><td>Yes (energy directive)</td><td>No</td><td>Yes (EU accessibility)</td><td>No direct</td><td>No direct</td><td>CRPD indirect</td><td>EU climate</td><td>EU circular economy</td><td>No</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td><strong>7. Election signal</strong></td><td>Strong positive</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Positive</td><td>Positive</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Negative potential</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Positive</td><td>Positive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3025,7 +3025,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th>Documents</th><th>Justification</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>P0 — Immediate action</strong></td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Fiscal policy with 1 May 2026 implementation; election-defining significance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P1 — High priority</strong></td><td>HD01KU33, HD01CU27, HD01CU28</td><td>Constitutional change; major property market reforms</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P2 — Significant</strong></td><td>HD01KU32, HD01CU22, HD01MJU21, HD01MJU19</td><td>Important legislative/EU compliance/audit significance</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P3 — Background</strong></td><td>HD01SfU20, HD01TU16</td><td>Administrative simplification; low controversy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; Access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3052,39 +3052,39 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; Access<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Classification</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Data retention</td><td>7 years (standard political analysis retention per ISMS)</td></tr><tr><td>Access control</td><td>Public — all sources from public primary sources (riksdagen.se)</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR Article 9</td><td>Not applicable — no individual political opinion data; party positions are public</td></tr><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>Standard public intelligence</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-source-classification">Source Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-classification">Source Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-classification"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents: Primary public source [A1] — Riksdagen API (data.riksdagen.se), confirmed via MCP at 2026-04-23T04:45Z</p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy">Cluster 1: Election-Year Fiscal and Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy">Cluster 1: Election-Year Fiscal and Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-election-year-fiscal-and-energy-policy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01FiU48 (Extra ändringsbudget)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01MJU21 (agricultural energy/climate — MJU scrutiny), HD01MJU19 (waste/circular economy EU compliance)</li>
 <li><strong>Tension</strong>: FiU48 fuel tax cuts vs. MJU19/MJU21 environmental ambition</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: Household economics vs. long-term climate policy trade-off</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package">Cluster 2: Constitutional Modernization Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package">Cluster 2: Constitutional Modernization Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-constitutional-modernization-package"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01KU33 (TF — beslag/husrannsakan digital insyn)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01KU32 (TF+YGL — tillgänglighetskrav medier)</li>
 <li><strong>Link</strong>: Both are vilande grundlagsändringar decided in same KU session; both require post-election second vote</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: Digital-era constitutional adaptation — crime-fighting efficiency × fundamental freedoms</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime">Cluster 3: Housing Market Transparency and Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime">Cluster 3: Housing Market Transparency and Anti-Crime<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-housing-market-transparency-and-anti-crime"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01CU27 (Identitetskrav lagfart + bostadsrättslagen)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01CU28 (Nationellt bostadsrättsregister)</li>
 <li><strong>Link</strong>: Both CU committee; complementary measures; both effective before/around election</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: Property market integrity, anti-money laundering, consumer protection</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform">Cluster 4: Social Welfare and Administrative Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform">Cluster 4: Social Welfare and Administrative Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-social-welfare-and-administrative-reform"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: HD01CU22 (Ställföreträdarskap)</li>
 <li><strong>Related</strong>: HD01SfU20 (Föräldrapenning), HD01TU16 (Körkort)</li>
 <li><strong>Theme</strong>: State service simplification, CRPD compliance, administrative deregulation</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme":"dark","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#1565C0","primaryTextColor":"#ffffff","primaryBorderColor":"#0A3F7F","lineColor":"#90CAF9","fontFamily":"Inter, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     subgraph "Constitutional Chain"
@@ -3114,22 +3114,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style CU28 fill:#7B1FA2,color:#fff
     style FiU48 fill:#E65100,color:#fff
     style ENERGY fill:#FF8F00,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <p>The April 2026 legislative sprint shows coordinated committee scheduling:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>FiU (FiU48) + KU (KU33, KU32) + CU (CU27, CU28, CU22) all reporting in the same week of 17–21 April 2026</li>
 <li>Pattern: Government tabling and committee approval synchronized for maximum legislative throughput before the summer recess and election campaign</li>
 <li>This is not unusual: the spring riksmöte sprint is standard, but the political salience of this year's package is higher than typical due to election-year timing</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling Folder Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling Folder Citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h3>
 <p>No sibling analysis folders present for this date (first run). Future Tier-C aggregation should reference:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> if props workflow runs same day</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/evening-analysis/</code> for synthesis integration</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3186,7 +3186,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit">ICD 203 Compliance Audit<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 Standard</th><th>Compliance</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Timely, objective analysis</td><td>PASS</td><td>Produced within hours; no partisan framing</td></tr><tr><td>2. Analytic tradecraft</td><td>PASS</td><td>Admiralty codes + WEP throughout</td></tr><tr><td>3. Distinguish intel from assessment</td><td>PASS</td><td>A1 = primary fact; B3/C3 = interpretive</td></tr><tr><td>4. Respect policymakers</td><td>PASS</td><td>Descriptive, not prescriptive</td></tr><tr><td>5. Transparent sources</td><td>PASS</td><td>All 10 dok_ids cited; MCP chain documented</td></tr><tr><td>6. Identify uncertainties</td><td>PASS</td><td>Confidence levels explicit</td></tr><tr><td>7. Robust processes</td><td>PASS</td><td>ACH, scenarios, SWOT+TOWS, DIW scoring</td></tr><tr><td>8. Structured analytic techniques</td><td>PASS</td><td>10 SAT techniques applied</td></tr><tr><td>9. Accurate information collection</td><td>PASS</td><td>All dok_ids verified via riksdagen.se API 2026-04-23</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Level</th><th>Count</th><th>Pct</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>5</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td>8</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td>7</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>LOW</td><td>3</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>VERY LOW</td><td>0</td><td>0%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques">SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques">SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3274,14 +3274,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-catalog-applied-10-techniques">SAT Catalog Applied (10 techniques
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Technique</th><th>Applied In</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses)</td><td>devils-advocate.md (H1, H2, H3)</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT + TOWS</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md (3 scenarios, sum 100%)</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Mapping</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md (15 actors)</td></tr><tr><td>Red Team Challenge</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td></tr><tr><td>DIW Scoring</td><td>significance-scoring.md (10 documents)</td></tr><tr><td>TTP Analysis</td><td>threat-analysis.md (TTP-01 to TTP-04)</td></tr><tr><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md (5 assumptions)</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative International</td><td>comparative-international.md (6 comparators)</td></tr><tr><td>Historical Parallels</td><td>historical-parallels.md</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents">Improvement 1: Full Text for High-DIW Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents">Improvement 1: Full Text for High-DIW Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-full-text-for-high-diw-documents"></a></h4>
 <p>HD01MJU21 was METADATA-ONLY. Next cycle: get_dokument_innehall with include_full_text: true for all L2+ documents (DIW >= 10) to improve evidence quality.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment">Improvement 2: Vote Record Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment">Improvement 2: Vote Record Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-vote-record-enrichment"></a></h4>
 <p>No get_voteringar calls in this run. For FiU48 and KU33/KU32 vilande votes, party-by-party records would confirm partisan alignment and elevate confidence from B3 to B2.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration">Improvement 3: Anforanden Integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration">Improvement 3: Anforanden Integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-anforanden-integration"></a></h4>
 <p>Use search_anforanden for FiU48 debates to obtain direct MP quotes, transforming unnamed party position claims into attributed statements with higher evidence quality.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3343,7 +3343,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party Neutrality Arithmetic<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Favorable</th><th>Critical</th><th>Balance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>Slightly positive (CU22 driver)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>Slightly positive</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>Reflects V actual position</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>Reflects MP actual position</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>Balanced</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-committee-reports
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24817022343
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-23T04:45:00Z
@@ -3352,7 +3352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Data Window</strong>: 2025/26 riksmöte, from_date 2026-04-01
 <strong>Riksdag Session</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>MCP Status</strong>: live (riksdag-regering: OK, sync confirmed 2026-04-23T04:39:41Z)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-table">Document Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-table">Document Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3461,7 +3461,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-table">Document Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <p><strong>Total documents</strong>: 10
 <strong>Full text available</strong>: 0 (API confirms fulltext_available=true; not fetched in this run to preserve rate limits)
 <strong>Summary available</strong>: 9/10 (HD01MJU21 has no summary — METADATA-ONLY)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>riksdag-regering</code> MCP: Available and live; sync at 2026-04-23T04:39:41Z</li>
 <li>Retrieval performed via <code>get_betankanden</code> + <code>search_dokument</code> + <code>get_dokument_innehall</code></li>
@@ -3469,11 +3469,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li><code>world-bank</code> MCP: Not queried in this manifest phase</li>
 <li>IMF data: Not queried in this manifest phase</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality">Data Quality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality">Data Quality<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 10 documents confirmed from riksdagen.se primary source [A1] per Admiralty Code</li>
 <li>Zero hallucinated dok_ids — all verified via API response</li>
 <li>Article date 2026-04-23 is current; lookback not required (multiple documents from 2026-04-14 to 2026-04-21)</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU22-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU27-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU28-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU32-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01KU33-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU19-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01MJU21-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU20-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01TU16-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3529,7 +3565,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:09.768Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:31.208Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html b/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html
index 98ad46485c..2ddd3eb992 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.928Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.410Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:09.928Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.410Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary","description":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with three interlocking packages dominating the legislative agenda: the 2026 Spring Fiscal Package (HD03100 vårproposition +…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:09.928Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03217-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03218-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03220-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary","description":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with three interlocking packages dominating the legislative agenda: the 2026 Spring Fiscal Package (HD03100 vårproposition +…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:31.410Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03217-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03218-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03220-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,22 +216,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Period</strong>: 2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31 | <strong>Session</strong>: Riksmöte 2025/26 (final spring phase)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with three interlocking packages dominating the legislative agenda: the 2026 Spring Fiscal Package (HD03100 vårproposition + HD0399 supplementary budget), a Law &#x26; Order Package consolidating the Tidöavtalet's criminal justice agenda, and an Energy Transition Package restructuring the electricity market. All three packages will receive final votes before the summer recess, with the vårproposition setting Sweden's fiscal trajectory through a pre-election period of moderate economic recovery and heightened defence spending.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [B2 — official government documents, riksdagen.se sources]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial priority-setting</strong>: Which legislative package deserves the deepest coverage during the April-May 2026 session? (Answer: Spring Fiscal Package — broadest societal impact, sets 2026-2027 parameters)</li>
 <li><strong>Political risk monitoring</strong>: Where are the most significant coalition stress points likely to emerge before the September 2026 election?</li>
 <li><strong>Forward-watch triggers</strong>: Which indicators signal that the governing coalition is gaining or losing momentum ahead of the autumn campaign?</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fiscal</strong>: Vårproposition HD03100 projects continued recovery (GDP growth recovering from -0.20% in 2023 to 0.82% in 2024); defence spending elevated; energy cost relief via HD03236 (fuel tax cut May–September 2026, energy price support Jan–Feb 2026 retroactively); net fiscal cost ~4.1 billion SEK. Riksdagen's Finance Committee (FiU) already passed HD01FiU48 on 2026-04-21.</li>
 <li><strong>Justice</strong>: HD03218 (double sentences for gang crime), HD03246 (youth offenders), HD03217 (civil servant liability), HD03235 (deportation) — all scheduled for spring votes. V, C, and MP have filed opposing motions on deportation; V and MP oppose arms regulation changes.</li>
@@ -240,10 +240,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Housing/Urban</strong>: HD01CU28 (national condominium register, effective 2027) and HD01CU27 (property identity requirements, effective 2026-07-01) both passed 2026-04-17.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔑 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔑 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch</strong>: Riksdagen vote on HD0399 Vårändringsbudget (expected late May 2026) — if S, V, MP, and C vote against the budget jointly, this signals maximum pre-election opposition unity and provides electoral narrative heading into summer.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-priority-ranking">📊 DIW Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-priority-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-priority-ranking">📊 DIW Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-priority-ranking"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Document Significance — Month Ahead April-May 2026
     x-axis Low Electoral Impact --> High Electoral Impact
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-priority-ranking">📊 DIW Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidd
     style HD03245 fill:#4A148C,color:#FFFFFF
     style HD03242 fill:#00695C,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-profile">🔒 Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-profile"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-profile">🔒 Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-profile"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Overall assessment confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 <li><strong>Economic data confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (World Bank 2024 data, vårproposition not yet full-text parsed)</li>
@@ -279,14 +279,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--confidence-profile">🔒 Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty Code</strong>: [B2] — Reliable source, confirmed by multiple independent parliamentary documents</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23 | <strong>Period</strong>: Apr 23 – May 31, 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative">Lead Story: Spring Fiscal Package Sets Pre-Election Economic Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative">Lead Story: Spring Fiscal Package Sets Pre-Election Economic Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative"></a></h3>
 <p>The Tidökoalition's 2026 Spring Fiscal Package — comprising HD03100 (vårproposition), HD0399 (vårändringsbudget), and HD03236 (extra ändringsbudget, already passed 2026-04-21 via HD01FiU48) — is the most consequential legislative cluster of the spring session. Sweden's GDP growth recovered from -0.20% in 2023 to 0.82% in 2024 (World Bank), and Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson's vårproposition charts a course toward continued but cautious recovery. The extra ändringsbudget cuts energy tax on petrol and diesel by 82 öre/litre and 319 SEK/m³ respectively for May–September 2026, costing approximately 1.56 billion SEK in lost revenue while providing ~2.4 billion SEK in energy price support — net fiscal deterioration of ~4.1 billion SEK in 2026. The Middle East conflict and high electricity prices in early 2026 are cited as justification [HD01FiU48, B2].</p>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: L3 (highest priority) [A1 — primary government documents, parliamentary confirmed]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     subgraph PKG1["💰 Spring Fiscal Package (L3)"]
         FP["HD03100 Vårproposition&#x3C;br/>Economic policy framework 2026-27"]
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a cl
     style NA fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF
     style KM fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -421,15 +421,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>DIW Tier</th><th>Priority Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 Ekonomisk vårproposition</td><td>L3</td><td>Sets entire fiscal framework through election</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>L3</td><td>Modifies spending structure for 2026</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD03218</td><td>Dubbla straff — kriminella nätverk</td><td>L2+</td><td>High political salience, election-year flagship</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>L2+</td><td>Structural reform of electricity market</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler</td><td>L2+</td><td>Contested — V/C/MP opposition motions filed</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03220</td><td>NATO framskjuten närvaro Finland</td><td>L2+</td><td>Security significance, bipartisan support</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>L2+</td><td>Revenue redistribution, rural–urban impact</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>L2+</td><td>Pre-election gender equality commitment</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Unga lagöverträdare</td><td>L2+</td><td>Juvenile justice reform, politically salient</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03217</td><td>Utökat tjänstemannaansvar</td><td>L2+</td><td>Rule of law reform, broad support expected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-synthesis">Thematic Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-synthesis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management">Theme 1: Pre-Election Fiscal Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-synthesis">Thematic Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-synthesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management">Theme 1: Pre-Election Fiscal Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management"></a></h4>
 <p>The government faces a classic pre-election dilemma: demonstrate competent stewardship while providing voter-visible relief. The fuel tax cut (82 öre/litre on petrol) directly targets working-class and rural voters who depend on private transport. Critics from S, V, and MP argue this contradicts climate commitments and is fiscally irresponsible. The vårproposition must balance defence spending growth (NATO commitments) with popular relief measures amid a fiscal framework whose surplus target becomes politically relevant if overshoot signals austerity.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform">Theme 2: Law &#x26; Order Election Platform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform">Theme 2: Law &#x26; Order Election Platform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidöavtalet's criminal justice agenda achieves its most concentrated legislative expression in May 2026. Double sentences for gang crime, stricter youth offender rules, expanded public servant accountability, and tighter deportation rules collectively form the government's most politically coherent package. With SD's support secured, these measures will pass — but V, C (partially), and MP opposition creates a clear left-right cleavage the Social Democrats can exploit.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation">Theme 3: Energy Market Transformation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation">Theme 3: Energy Market Transformation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation"></a></h4>
 <p>The electricity laws package (HD03240) represents the most structurally significant legislation of the session. New market architecture, a dedicated environmental permitting authority (replacing regional boards for large projects), and mandatory revenue-sharing for wind power municipalities alter the investment landscape for both renewable energy and fossil fuel alternatives.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Suggested SEO title</strong>: "Sweden's Parliament: Five Weeks of Budget, Crime, and Energy Votes Before Summer Recess"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description (158 chars)</strong>: "Swedish parliament votes on the spring fiscal package, gang crime double penalties, and electricity market reform in the final five weeks before the 2026 election campaign."</li>
@@ -437,12 +437,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>Secondary keywords</strong>: vårproposition 2026, Swedish election 2026, Swedish energy reform</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC — Offentlighetsprincipen basis; data from open Riksdag sources
 <strong>Framework</strong>: osint-tradecraft-standards.md — Key Judgments, Admiralty, WEP, PIR handoff</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>KJ-1</strong> (Likely / [B2]): The Tidökoalitionen will complete the 2025/26 spring session with its three core legislative packages (Spring Fiscal, Law &#x26; Order, Energy Transition) largely intact, giving PM Kristersson a "delivery" narrative ahead of the September 2026 general election.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <p><strong>KJ-5</strong> (Unlikely / [C3]): An external shock (Russian escalation, energy price spike, IMF growth revision) will force an emergency pivot in the spring session — the current probability is Remote to Unlikely; Sweden's fiscal buffers and NATO membership reduce vulnerability.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-profile">Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-profile"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-profile-1">Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-profile-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-profile">Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KJ</th><th>WEP Band</th><th>Kent %</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1</td><td>Likely</td><td>60–70%</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Coalition parliamentary record 2022–26; Riksdag vote counts</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2</td><td>Roughly even</td><td>40–50%</td><td>[C2]</td><td>C motion HD024095; historical C voting patterns</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3</td><td>Very likely</td><td>80–90%</td><td>[B1]</td><td>11 interpellations identified; S party strategy documents</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-4</td><td>Very likely</td><td>80–90%</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Norway analogy (Comparator 1); public opinion polling patterns</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-5</td><td>Unlikely</td><td>15–25%</td><td>[C3]</td><td>Geopolitical baseline assessment; no confirmed indicators</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Carried-forward PIRs from prior analytical cycle</strong>:</p>
 <p>This analysis is the first run of the 2026-04-23 period. No prior-cycle month-ahead analysis exists under <code>analysis/daily/</code> for the month of March 2026 within this repository. PIRs below are reconstructed from standing requirements:</p>
 
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingesti
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Standing Requirement</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1</td><td>Budget/fiscal track — Monitor vårproposition</td><td>RESOLVED — HD03100 + HD0399 filed; HD01FiU48 enacted. Fiscal stimulus confirmed.</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2</td><td>Justice/gang crime — Monitor law &#x26; order package</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03218 + HD03246 in committee; passage expected May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3</td><td>Energy transition — New electricity law</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03240 + HD03239 in committee NU</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4</td><td>NATO/defence — Forward presence</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03220 in FöU committee</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5</td><td>Migration — Deportation rules</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03235 in SfU; opposition motions filed</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6</td><td>Ukraine — Legal accountability</td><td>PARTIALLY RESOLVED — HD03232 + HD03231 filed; proceedings stage</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7</td><td>Election 2026 — Legislative legacy formation</td><td>ACTIVE — all packages interpreted through Sept 2026 lens</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gap</th><th>Description</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>G-1</td><td>Committee hearing schedules not confirmed</td><td>Cannot pinpoint exact vote dates for HD03218, HD03235, HD03240</td></tr><tr><td>G-2</td><td>SD internal deliberations on HD03235</td><td>No public record of SD group vote; inference only</td></tr><tr><td>G-3</td><td>C position post-HD024095 rejection</td><td>C may shift position without public announcement</td></tr><tr><td>G-4</td><td>Riksbank monetary policy path Q2–Q3 2026</td><td>May interact with fiscal stimulus; direction uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>G-5</td><td>Sweden Q1 2026 GDP print</td><td>Not yet available; World Bank 2024 data used; actual may differ</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle">Collection Requirements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle">Collection Requirements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Monitor C parliamentary group statements on HD03235 (weekly)</li>
 <li>Monitor JuU committee hearing schedule for HD03218 (next 2 weeks)</li>
@@ -606,9 +606,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle">Collection Requirements for N
 <li>Track NATO/SACEUR announcements on HD03220 deployment timeline</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-framework"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Description</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>D — Depth</strong></td><td>Political complexity, institutional reach</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I — Immediate Impact</strong></td><td>Direct policy effect within 30–90 days</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W — Width</strong></td><td>Number of constituencies, parties, sectors affected</td><td>30%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-diw-scores">Ranked DIW Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-diw-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-diw-scores">Ranked DIW Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-diw-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -821,12 +821,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-diw-scores">Ranked DIW Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 Ekonomisk vårproposition</td><td>9</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td><strong>9.65</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03100; World Bank GDP -0.20%→+0.82%</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.00</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD0399; 4.1 bn SEK net fiscal impact</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD03218</td><td>Dubbla straff — kriminella nätverk</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03218; HD024092/HD024091 opposing motions</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.70</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03240; electricity market restructuring</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>HD024090/HD024095/HD024097 opposing motions</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03220</td><td>NATO framskjuten närvaro Finland</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03220; bipartisan support context</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03239; revenue redistribution</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03245; HD10438 interpellation context</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler — unga lagöverträdare</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.65</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03246; youth justice reform</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03217</td><td>Utökat tjänstemannaansvar</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>6.65</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03217; accountability framework</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet — datadelning</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>6.35</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03244; digital government reform</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernt regelverk krigsmateriel</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>HD024096/HD024091 opposing motions</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>7</td><td><strong>6.00</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03242; rural constituencies</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (fuel/energy)</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.70</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>HD01FiU48 PASSED 2026-04-21; 4.1 bn SEK impact</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td><strong>5.70</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03238</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: HD03236 scored high on Immediate Impact but ranking depressed by the fact it already passed (HD01FiU48)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If vårproposition projects GDP contraction</strong>: Significance of HD03100 rises to DIW 10.0 — entire fiscal framework under threat, opposition gains electoral momentum.</p>
 <p><strong>If V/C/MP succeed in opposing utvisningsregler</strong>: DIW score of HD03235 rises to 9.0 — coalition faces first significant legislative defeat of spring session.</p>
 <p><strong>If energy prices remain elevated through May</strong>: DIW score of HD03240 rises to 9.0 — immediate market relevance amplified.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-distribution">Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-distribution">Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Distribution — Month Ahead 2026-04-23"
     x-axis ["HD03100", "HD0399", "HD03218", "HD03236", "HD03240", "HD03235", "HD03220", "HD03239", "HD03245", "HD03246"]
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-distribution">Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-
 
 %%{init: {'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'secondaryColor': '#C62828', 'tertiaryColor': '#2E7D32', 'edgeLabelBackground': '#FFFFFF', 'fontSize': '14px'}}}%%</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-improvement-notes">Pass-2 Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-improvement-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-improvement-notes">Pass-2 Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-improvement-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Evidence Admiralty codes added to each ranked item</li>
 <li>Sensitivity analysis expanded to three scenarios</li>
@@ -843,9 +843,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-pass-2-improvement-notes">Pass-2 Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>DIW weights explicitly defined and applied consistently [Methodology per synthesis-methodology.md]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-party-framing-map">Party Framing Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-framing-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-framing-map">Party Framing Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-framing-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-framing-map">Party Framing Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Core narrative frame</th><th>Key evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (government)</td><td>"Delivery — we promised, we delivered"</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; three packages in progress</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>"Not enough — immigration enforcement must be total"</td><td>May file reservations if HD03235 deemed insufficient</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>"Pro-family, pro-safety"</td><td>Women's strategy (HD03245); crime package</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>"Energy transition + security"</td><td>HD03240, HD03239, HD03220</td></tr><tr><td>S (opposition)</td><td>"Government manages crises without structural solutions"</td><td>6+ interpellations on housing, shelters, police</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>"Climate and workers first"</td><td>3 opposing motions: fuel, deportation, arms</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>"Climate emergency requires reversal of fuel tax"</td><td>HD024098; EU Climate Law framing</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>"Moderate reform — not extreme immigration"</td><td>HD024095 systematic crime threshold</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-press-framing-expected">Press Framing (Expected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-framing-expected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-press-framing-expected">Press Framing (Expected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-framing-expected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-press-framing-expected">Press Framing (Expected)<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Media type</th><th>Expected angle</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svenska Dagbladet (conservative)</td><td>Delivery narrative; coalition stability</td><td>Editorial alignment with M/coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Dagens Nyheter (liberal)</td><td>Mixed — energy transition positive; deportation concerns</td><td>Liberal editorial line</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet (tabloid/social-dem)</td><td>Opposition amplification — shelters, housing</td><td>Social Democratic-adjacent</td></tr><tr><td>SVT/SR (public)</td><td>Balanced — covers all parties; committee hearing focus</td><td>PSB mandate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-media-risk-indicators">Media Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-risk-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-media-risk-indicators">Media Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-risk-indicators"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Women's shelter story</strong> (HD10438) — high viral potential; human interest angle; negative for government</li>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax cut = climate betrayal</strong> framing — sustained NGO campaign likely through summer</li>
@@ -939,12 +939,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-media-risk-indicators">Media Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — media framing projections; no actual press coverage reviewed (open-access Swedish press not queried)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder impact matrix per stakeholder-impact.md template</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-6-lenses">6 Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lenses"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-lenses">6 Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lenses"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Government/Coalition</strong> — Tidökoalitionen (M+KD+L+SD support)</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition</strong> — S, V, MP, C (outside coalition)</li>
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-lenses">6 Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><strong>Civil Society</strong> — NGOs, employers, trade unions, media</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition">Lens 1: Government/Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition">Lens 1: Government/Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition">Lens 1: Government/Coalition<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td><td>Government leader</td><td>Drives spring agenda; responsible for all three packages</td><td>Positive — packages align with Tidöavtalet commitments</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Fiscal principal</td><td>Vårproposition (HD03100) + extra ändringsbudget (HD03236); targeted by 3 interpellations (HD10444, HD10442, HD10433)</td><td>Defensive on fiscal tightness; proactive on recovery narrative</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Justice package lead</td><td>HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235 — full law &#x26; order package</td><td>Strong proponent; targeted by HD10439 and HD10441 interpellations</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Climate/Energy Minister Johan Britz (L)</td><td>Energy reform lead</td><td>HD03239, HD03240, HD03238 — energy and climate agenda</td><td>Balancing renewable growth with fossil fuel relief (tension noted)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD parliamentary group</td><td>Coalition support</td><td>Pivotal support for law &#x26; order package; may seek concessions</td><td>Broadly supportive; monitors if measures "strong enough"</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Housing/transport</td><td>Targeted by HD10434 (housing shortfall) and HD10428 (emergency airport)</td><td>Defensive — housing construction shortfall in Stockholm region noted</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition">Lens 2: Opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-opposition">Lens 2: Opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition">Lens 2: Opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>Main opposition</td><td>Filed most active interpellation campaign in session (6+ in 14 days): HD10444, HD10443, HD10439, HD10438, HD10434, HD10433</td><td>Coordinated offensive — economy, justice, housing, gender equality</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>Left opposition</td><td>Opposing HD03235 (HD024090), HD03228 (HD024091), HD03236 (HD024092)</td><td>Hard opposition — strongest critic of fuel tax cut and deportation</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>Green opposition</td><td>Opposing HD03236 (HD024098), HD03228 (HD024096), HD03235 (HD024097), HD03229 (HD024087)</td><td>Climate-framed opposition — most motions relate to environment and rights</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>Centrist opposition</td><td>Partially opposing HD03235 (HD024095 — requires "systematic and repeated" crime threshold)</td><td>Selective opposition — moderate position on deportation, pro-NATO</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-citizens">Lens 3: Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-citizens"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-citizens">Lens 3: Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-citizens"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-citizens">Lens 3: Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Concern</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural drivers/commuters</td><td>✅ Benefit from 82 öre/litre petrol cut (May–Sep 2026)</td><td>Relief temporary — returns after September</td><td>[A1] — HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Households with heating costs</td><td>✅ Retroactive energy price support for Jan–Feb 2026</td><td>Already paid; relief via Försäkringskassan reimbursement mechanism</td><td>[A1] — HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Victims of gang crime</td><td>✅ Double sentences reduce repeat offending risk</td><td>Implementation timeline unclear</td><td>[A2] — HD03218</td></tr><tr><td>Youth offenders</td><td>⚠️ Stricter penalties — rehabilitation concerns raised by V/S</td><td>Disproportionate impact on socioeconomically vulnerable youth</td><td>[B2] — HD03246 + motions</td></tr><tr><td>Women facing domestic violence</td><td>⚠️ Strategy (HD03245) published but shelters closing (HD10438)</td><td>Implementation gap between strategy and real-world provision</td><td>[A2] — HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>Municipalities hosting wind turbines</td><td>✅ Revenue-sharing law (HD03239) — new income stream</td><td>Revenue percentage not specified in available summary</td><td>[A2] — HD03239</td></tr><tr><td>Property buyers</td><td>✅ Condominium register (HD01CU28) — greater market transparency</td><td>Implementation not until 2027</td><td>[A1] — HD01CU28</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-international-actors">Lens 4: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-international-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-international-actors">Lens 4: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-international-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-international-actors">Lens 4: International Actors<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>NATO (Supreme Headquarters)</td><td>HD03220 (forward presence in Finland) strengthens Article 5 eastern flank</td><td>Positive — demonstrates Swedish commitment</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Finland (host nation)</td><td>Direct beneficiary of HD03220 forward deployment</td><td>Positive — military cooperation deepened</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Russia</td><td>HD03220 interpreted as provocation — diplomatic countermeasures possible</td><td>Negative — potential protest note</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut potentially conflicts with EU Climate Law and Fit for 55</td><td>Watching — no formal proceedings yet</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine</td><td>HD03232 + HD03231 (tribunal and compensation commission accession)</td><td>Positive — legal accountability mechanism supported</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export recipients</td><td>HD03228 (modernised arms rules) — clearer export framework</td><td>Mixed — MP/V concerned about export controls</td><td>[A1] — HD024096, HD024091</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-institutions">Lens 5: Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-institutions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-institutions">Lens 5: Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-institutions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-institutions">Lens 5: Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Institution</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen</td><td>HD03241 (fiscal framework report) + HD03219 (dental care) in scope</td><td>Auditor role — findings may constrain government options</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish courts</td><td>HD03218, HD03235 will face proportionality reviews — risk R02 and R05</td><td>Judicial independence applies</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>New Environmental Permitting Authority</td><td>HD03238 — new agency to be established</td><td>Institutional start-up risk; staffing/mandate timeline unclear</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Police Authority</td><td>HD03237 (paid police training) + HD10439 (Stockholm shortfall)</td><td>Benefits from training reform; capacity gaps acknowledged</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Försäkringskassan</td><td>HD01SfU20 — simplified parental benefit process</td><td>Administrative efficiency gain; implementation 2026-07-01</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-civil-society">Lens 6: Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-civil-society">Lens 6: Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-civil-society"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-civil-society">Lens 6: Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>LO (trade union confederation)</td><td>Interpellation HD10437 (pay transparency) relates to union interests</td><td>Supportive of pay transparency directive implementation</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Women's shelter organisations</td><td>HD10438 — multiple closures despite HD03245 strategy</td><td>Highly negative — underfunding threatens existence</td><td>[A2] — HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish Forests Association</td><td>HD03242 (forestry rules) — active regulatory revision</td><td>Industry supportive of clarity; environmental NGOs concerned</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Tech sector</td><td>HD03244 (interoperability) + HD01TU21 (e-legitimation)</td><td>Industry broadly supportive of digital government infrastructure</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental NGOs</td><td>HD03236 (fuel tax cut) direct contradiction of climate strategy</td><td>Strongly opposed — ally of MP/V framing</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOV["🏛️ Tidökoalitionen&#x3C;br/>(M+KD+L+SD)"]
     S["🔴 Socialdemokraterna&#x3C;br/>(Main opposition)"]
@@ -1279,11 +1279,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style MEDIA fill:#4A148C,color:#FFFFFF
     style RIKSREV fill:#37474F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Gate requirement</strong>: ≥10 indicators with date patterns across 4 horizons</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-set">Indicator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-set"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-set">Indicator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-set"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-set">Indicator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Total</strong>: 13 indicators — gate requirement of ≥10 MET ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-dashboard">Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-dashboard">Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
     dateFormat  YYYY-MM-DD
@@ -1433,16 +1433,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-dashboard">Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     Riksmöte recess                    :2026-06-01, 14d
     Pre-election manifesto             :2026-06-01, 30d</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: strategic-extensions-methodology.md — F3EAD Exploit→Analyze</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framing">Scenario Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framing">Scenario Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framing"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Central Question</strong>: What are the dominant alternative futures for Sweden's political landscape by May 31, 2026 (end of spring session)?</p>
 <p><strong>Scope</strong>: 38-day window (2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31)
 <strong>Horizon</strong>: Session-end (H2 immediate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive">Scenario Set (3 Alternatives — Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive">Scenario Set (3 Alternatives — Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhausti
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Name</th><th>WEP Probability</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1</td><td><strong>Stable Close</strong> — Government completes spring session agenda intact</td><td>Likely (60–70%)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S-2</td><td><strong>Legislative Fracture</strong> — One or more major bills defeated or delayed</td><td>Unlikely (20–30%)</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>S-3</td><td><strong>Crisis Pivot</strong> — External shock (economic/security) forces emergency response</td><td>Remote (5–15%)</td><td>[D4]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: probabilities sum to 100% within rounding tolerance</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60">Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Likely — 60%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60">Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Likely — 60%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The Tidökoalitionen manages SD support and keeps C/L on key votes. The full Law &#x26; Order Package passes JuU; the Energy Transition Package passes NU+MJU. SD accepts HD03235 deportation rules as "adequate first step." C supports HD03235 after amendment to require systematic + repeated crime threshold (per motion HD024095). The vårproposition (HD03100) and supplementary budget (HD0399) pass FiU with government majority. PM Kristersson enters the summer break with three legislative packages delivered.</p>
 <p><strong>Key enabling conditions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60">Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Lik
 <li>JuU approves HD03218 committee report (by May 15)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25">Scenario S-2: Legislative Fracture (Unlikely — 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25">Scenario S-2: Legislative Fracture (Unlikely — 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: C withdraws support for HD03235 over proportionality concerns (motion HD024095 rejected by coalition). V and MP join S in a surprise vote defeating HD03235. Alternatively, HD0399 fails because SD demands amendments on welfare cuts that M rejects. The government is forced into extended committee negotiations, delaying one or more packages past the May 31 session-end.</p>
 <p><strong>Key enabling conditions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25">Scenario S-2: Legisla
 <li>JuU chair requests extended consultation period (by May 5)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10">Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Remote — 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10">Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Remote — 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: External shock — Russia escalates Baltic Sea military activity following HD03220 deployment in Finland; energy price spike driven by Middle East escalation; or IMF revises Sweden growth outlook sharply negative after Q1 data — forces government to abandon normal spring session schedule. Emergency session called; fiscal framework revised; Riksdag recess cancelled.</p>
 <p><strong>Key enabling conditions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1524,18 +1524,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10">Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Rem
 <li>Riksdag talman issues session extension notice (any date)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-validation">Scenario Probability Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-validation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-validation">Scenario Probability Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-validation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Scenario Probability Distribution (% of futures)
     "S-1 Stable Close" : 65
     "S-2 Legislative Fracture" : 25
     "S-3 Crisis Pivot" : 10</pre>
 <p><strong>Confidence assessment</strong>: [C2] — Assessed from public parliamentary record; coalition defection risks inferred from motion/interpellation patterns. External shock probability based on geopolitical baseline, not confirmed intelligence.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 5-dimension × 5-level Likelihood × Impact register per political-risk-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1642,7 +1642,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Domain</th><th>L (1–5)</th><th>I (1–5)</th><th>Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01</td><td>Vårändringsbudget (HD0399) defeated by unified opposition (S+V+MP+C)</td><td>Fiscal/Political</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R02</td><td>Deportation rule (HD03235) challenged in EU Court — Swedish courts apply restrictive interpretation</td><td>Legal</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R03</td><td>Electricity prices remain above 1.50 SEK/kWh through May, amplifying energy reform urgency</td><td>Economic/Energy</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R04</td><td>SD demands additional concessions on immigration/crime ahead of budget vote, destabilising coalition</td><td>Political</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R05</td><td>Gang crime sentences (HD03218) challenged on proportionality grounds by courts</td><td>Legal</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R06</td><td>Environmental permitting authority (HD03238) experiences implementation delays — renewable energy pipeline blocked</td><td>Governance</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R07</td><td>Women's shelter closure crisis escalates — government forced to emergency funding before election</td><td>Social</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R08</td><td>NATO forward presence in Finland triggers Russian countermeasures or diplomatic incident</td><td>Security</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R09</td><td>Spring fiscal projections revised downward — GDP growth forecast cut, undermining Svantesson narrative</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Wind power revenue-sharing (HD03239) opposed by municipal governments as insufficient</td><td>Governance</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-55-risk-heat-map">5×5 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-55-risk-heat-map">5×5 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Likelihood × Impact (April–May 2026)
     x-axis Low Impact (1) --> High Impact (5)
@@ -1673,15 +1673,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-55-risk-heat-map">5×5 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style R09 fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style R10 fill:#757575,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes">Chain 1: Fiscal Dominoes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes">Chain 1: Fiscal Dominoes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>R09</strong> (GDP revision down) → <strong>R01</strong> (budget defeat risk rises) → Opposition exploits fiscal weakness → <strong>R04</strong> (SD demands more) → Coalition credibility crisis ahead of September election</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash">Chain 2: Law &#x26; Order Backlash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash">Chain 2: Law &#x26; Order Backlash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>R02</strong> (deportation court challenge) → EU compliance pressure → <strong>R05</strong> (sentencing proportionality) → Government retreats on headline policy → SD loses confidence in coalition effectiveness</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict">Chain 3: Energy–Climate Conflict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict">Chain 3: Energy–Climate Conflict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>R03</strong> (high energy prices) → Government doubles down on fossil fuel relief → <strong>T3 from SWOT</strong> (climate credibility gap) → EU / international criticism → Election-year reputational damage</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1713,17 +1713,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Prior Probability</th><th>Updating Event</th><th>Posterior</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01 (budget defeat)</td><td>15%</td><td>If all three parties S, V, MP confirm joint opposition</td><td>45%</td></tr><tr><td>R08 (NATO security)</td><td>10%</td><td>If Russia conducts Baltic exercise during Finland deployment</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td>R02 (deportation legal)</td><td>30%</td><td>If UN Human Rights Committee issues advisory</td><td>60%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-notes">Confidence Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-notes">Confidence Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All risk assessments are based on public parliamentary documents. Likelihood scores reflect political dynamics observable from parliamentary record; they are not probabilistic models.<br>
 <strong>Admiralty Code</strong>: [B2] — Reliable source, confirmed by multiple independent documents.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Tidökoalitionen's legislative agenda, April 23 – May 31, 2026
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political SWOT per political-swot-framework.md + TOWS matrix</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Coherent legislative package in law &#x26; order — double penalties (HD03218), youth rules (HD03246), civil servant liability (HD03217), deportation (HD03235) form a unified electoral narrative</td><td>HD03218 submitted 2026-04-09; HD03246 submitted 2026-04-16; riksdagen.se primary sources</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Spring Fiscal Package already partially implemented — extra ändringsbudget (HD03236) passed via HD01FiU48 on 2026-04-21, delivering visible fuel tax relief before summer</td><td>HD01FiU48 committee report confirmed passed; 82 öre/litre petrol reduction, 319 SEK/m³ diesel</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Energy policy package (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238) positions Sweden as European electricity market leader — new laws consolidate grid architecture, create dedicated permitting authority</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03240; HD03239 introduces mandatory revenue-sharing for hosting municipalities</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>NATO integration (HD03220) enjoys broad cross-party support — even S voted for NATO accession in 2022; Finnish forward presence strengthens Nordic-Baltic deterrence</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03220; cross-party context from 2022 NATO vote</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Strong institutional capacity — Finance Committee (FiU) processed extra ändringsbudget within 8 days of submission; committee system functioning effectively</td><td>HD01FiU48 dated 2026-04-21 vs HD03236 dated 2026-04-13</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>Fiscal credibility risk — extra ändringsbudget deteriorates fiscal balance by 4.1 billion SEK in 2026 at a time when the government's own fiscal framework targets surplus</td><td>HD01FiU48 summary: statens inkomster minskar ~1.56 bn SEK, utgifter ökar ~2.4 bn SEK</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Law &#x26; order package lacks S/V/MP/C consensus — HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP) all oppose key provisions of deportation rules, widening the legislative divide</td><td>HD024090, HD024095, HD024097 all filed 2026-04-16 against HD03235</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>Police shortage undermines law &#x26; order narrative — interpellation HD10439 (Mattias Vepsä, S) highlights persistent regional gaps despite achievement of 10,000 police recruitment target</td><td>HD10439 filed 2026-04-20: BRÅ evaluation noted gaps in Stockholm deployment</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Women's shelters closures contradict gender equality strategy — interpellation HD10438 documents closure of multiple shelters while HD03245 positions government as champion of women's safety</td><td>HD10438 (Sofia Amloh, S → Nina Larsson, L) filed 2026-04-17</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Economic recovery narrative — GDP growth recovering from -0.20% (2023) to 0.82% (2024) allows Finance Minister Svantesson to campaign on stability and recovery ahead of September election</td><td>World Bank Sweden GDP data 2023–2024</td><td>[B1]</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Energy crisis exploited for political advantage — high electricity prices in early 2026 justified extra ändringsbudget; if energy remains elevated through May, government can amplify relief narrative</td><td>HD01FiU48 summary cites conflict in Mellanöstern and harsh winter 2026 as justifications</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>Condominium register (HD01CU28) + identity requirements (HD01CU27) address housing market opacity — government can position these as anti-crime/anti-money-laundering measures</td><td>HD01CU28 passed 2026-04-17; HD01CU27 effective 2026-07-01</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Interoperability proposal (HD03244) builds digital government credentials — data-sharing modernisation positions Sweden at EU NIS2/data-act frontier</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03244; EU regulatory alignment context</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Opposition unity risk — if S, V, MP, and C coordinate against the vårändringsbudget (HD0399), the government faces a dramatic budget defeat in the final session week before election campaign</td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP) all oppose fuel tax cut; C ambiguous</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>SD credibility risk — SD MPs' relationship with the Tidö agenda may be tested if gang crime measures are perceived as insufficient; SD could seek to outbid M/KD/L on punitiveness</td><td>HD03218 context; SD's crime narrative history</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Environmental credibility gap — fuel tax cut (HD03236, passed) directly contradicts Sweden's own climate targets; risk of EU infringement proceedings or diplomatic embarrassment at COP32</td><td>HD01FiU48 passed; MP motion HD024098 and V motion HD024092 explicitly cite climate impacts</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>Healthcare investment gap — interpellation HD10432 (Robert Olesen, S → Health Minister Elisabet Lann, KD) exposes ageing hospital infrastructure with massive capital requirements</td><td>HD10432 filed 2026-04-15; many Swedish hospitals built in 1960s</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1901,14 +1901,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th><strong>Strengths (S1–S5)</strong></th><th><strong>Weaknesses (W1–W4)</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities (O1–O4)</strong></td><td><strong>SO Strategies</strong>: Use S2+O2 (fuel tax relief + energy narrative) to build pre-election credibility; use S3+O3 (energy reform + housing transparency) as digital governance platform</td><td><strong>WO Strategies</strong>: Address W4 (shelters) via O1 (recovery dividend) — fund women's shelters through fiscal surplus; address W3 (police gaps) via O1 — deploy incremental policing resources</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats (T1–T4)</strong></td><td><strong>ST Strategies</strong>: Use S4 (NATO bipartisan support) to counter T2 (SD outbidding); use S1 (coherent L&#x26;O narrative) to pre-empt T1 (opposition unity)</td><td><strong>WT Strategies</strong>: Address W1+T3 (fiscal-climate gap) — announce a phased return of fuel tax from October 2026 to restore climate credentials without losing summer voter support</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S2 (extra budget passed) <strong>amplifies</strong> T3 (climate credibility gap) — the fastest legislative win is simultaneously the most environmentally damaging symbol</li>
 <li>W4 (shelter closures) <strong>directly contradicts</strong> S1 (law &#x26; order coherence) — the government's own social safety net strategy undermines its gender equality narrative</li>
 <li>O1 (recovery narrative) <strong>partially mitigates</strong> W1 (fiscal risk) — if growth accelerates to 2%+, the 4.1 bn SEK deterioration appears manageable in debt/GDP terms</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-visualisation">SWOT Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-visualisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-visualisation">SWOT Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-visualisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT Analysis — Tidökoalitionen Spring 2026
     x-axis Internal --> External
@@ -1937,12 +1937,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-visualisation">SWOT Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style T1 fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style T3 fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political Threat Taxonomy per political-threat-framework.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-i-legislative-threats">Category I: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-i-legislative-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-i-legislative-threats">Category I: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-i-legislative-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1977,7 +1977,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-i-legislative-threats">Category I: Legislative Threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>LT-01</td><td>Unified opposition vote defeats vårändringsbudget HD0399</td><td>S+V+MP</td><td>Formal parliamentary vote</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>LT-02</td><td>Constitutional amendment (HD01KU33 — digital seizure) requires second reading after 2026 election</td><td>KU process</td><td>Constitutional procedural constraint</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>LT-03</td><td>V/C/MP jointly amend or defeat HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>V+C+MP</td><td>Opposition motions HD024090, HD024095, HD024097</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-ii-institutional-threats">Category II: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-ii-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-ii-institutional-threats">Category II: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-ii-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-ii-institutional-threats">Category II: Institutional Threats
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>IT-01</td><td>New environmental permitting authority (HD03238) faces delay — conflicts with existing Naturvårdsverket authority</td><td>Bureaucratic</td><td>Implementation gap</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>IT-02</td><td>Riksrevisionen (National Audit Office) broadens fiscal scrutiny scope — second report (HD03241) triggers parliamentary accountability hearings</td><td>Riksrevisionen</td><td>Audit findings</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-iii-electoral-threats">Category III: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iii-electoral-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-iii-electoral-threats">Category III: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iii-electoral-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-iii-electoral-threats">Category III: Electoral Threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ET-01</td><td>Social Democrats consolidate opposition narrative around government's "crisis management incompetence" — 6 interpellations filed in one week signal coordinated offensive</td><td>S</td><td>Interpellation campaign (HD10444, HD10443, HD10439, HD10438, HD10434, HD10433)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ET-02</td><td>SD outbids M/KD/L on crime/immigration hardness, eroding coalition right flank</td><td>SD</td><td>Media positioning</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ET-03</td><td>MP and V campaign on climate rollback (HD03236 fuel tax cut) — younger urban voters shift</td><td>MP+V</td><td>Campaign framing</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats">Category IV: External/Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats">Category IV: External/Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats">Category IV: External/Security
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>XT-01</td><td>Russian diplomatic reaction to NATO forward presence (HD03220)</td><td>Russia</td><td>Diplomatic protest / military signalling</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>XT-02</td><td>EU Commission examines Swedish fuel tax cut against Climate Law</td><td>EU Commission</td><td>Infringement proceedings risk</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>XT-03</td><td>Middle East conflict escalates — energy prices spike, further fiscal pressure on HD0399</td><td>External</td><td>Market forces</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign">Attack Tree — ET-01 (Opposition Coordinated Interpellation Campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign">Attack Tree — ET-01 (Opposition Coordinated Interpellation Campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT["🎯 Weaken Tidö Government Pre-Election"]
 
@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign">At
     style B3 fill:#1976D2,color:#FFFFFF
     style C1 fill:#6A1B9A,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat">Kill Chain Analysis — LT-01 (Budget Defeat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat">Kill Chain Analysis — LT-01 (Budget Defeat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat">Kill Chain Analysis — LT-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Phase</th><th>Description</th><th>Current State</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Opposition assess government vulnerability on fiscal policy</td><td>ACTIVE — S, V, MP filed motions</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Fuel tax cut framed as climate betrayal + fiscal irresponsibility</td><td>ACTIVE — MP motion HD024098</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>Joint parliamentary motion and whipping</td><td>POTENTIAL — C position unclear</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>Budget vote fails — government loses fiscal credibility</td><td>NOT YET</td></tr><tr><td>C&#x26;C</td><td>S leads narrative; V/MP flank on climate; C holds pivotal votes</td><td>POTENTIAL</td></tr><tr><td>Persistence</td><td>Electoral damage extends through summer campaign</td><td>PROJECTED IF SUCCESSFUL</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2186,18 +2186,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (P
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [C2 — assessed from public documents; opposition intent inferred from parliamentary record]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L3 (full analysis)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:100 — Vårpropositionen 2026 (Spring Fiscal Policy Bill)
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen (Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson, M)
 <strong>Status</strong>: In committee (FiU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: The government's spring economic framework projects GDP recovery (0.82% growth 2025, expanding in 2026), sets ceiling for the supplementary budget, and establishes fiscal priorities for the remainder of the Riksmöte 2025/26 session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>GDP growth revised upward from 2025/26 budget assumptions — World Bank data confirms +0.82% 2024</li>
 <li>Fiscal space identified for spring relief measures (HD03236 fuel tax, retroactive energy support)</li>
@@ -2205,7 +2205,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Revenue forecasts updated for 2026 given employment recovery</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-context">Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-context">Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-context">Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Partisan alignment</td><td>Fully coalition-sponsored</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition response</td><td>S filed interpellations HD10444, HD10443, HD10433 targeting Finance Minister</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD position</td><td>Broadly supportive; monitors fiscal relief for constituents</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>C position</td><td>Not opposing fiscal framework</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-score">DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-score">DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2271,20 +2271,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-score">DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Decision impact</td><td>9/10</td><td>Sets fiscal framework for entire spring session</td></tr><tr><td>Intelligence value</td><td>8/10</td><td>Informs all downstream budget analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Warning value</td><td>7/10</td><td>Revenue miss would trigger fiscal adjustment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>Top-tier significance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-flags">Risk Flags<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-flags"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-flags">Risk Flags<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-flags"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>R-01: Revenue miss → fiscal adjustment (see risk-assessment.md)</li>
 <li>R-06: EU fiscal rules scrutiny</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — primary source, directly from Riksdagen API</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03217">HD03217<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03217"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03217-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03217 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Extended criminal liability for civil servants
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen | <strong>Committee</strong>: KU</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: Expands criminal liability for public officials for abuse of office. Strengthens public sector accountability. DIW Score: 4.8/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03218">HD03218<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03218"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03218-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03218 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:218 — Dubbla straff vid gängkriminalitet
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen (Justice Minister Strömmer)</p>
@@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03218">HD03218<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>Implementation risk</strong>: Courts must identify "gang context" — legal definition clarity required.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03220">HD03220<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03220"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03220-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03220 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:220 — Militär framskjuten närvaro i Finland
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen (Defence)</p>
@@ -2303,7 +2303,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03220">HD03220<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>NATO context</strong>: Consistent with Allied eastern flank commitments; smaller than Germany's Lithuania brigade but symbolically important for first-time NATO member Sweden.
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Russian diplomatic reaction (XT-01 in threat-analysis.md) possible.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03235">HD03235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03235"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03235 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:235 — Utvisning vid brottsliga gärningar
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03235">HD03235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>Legal risk</strong>: R-02 in risk-assessment.md — ECHR Article 8 challenge probable.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] + [C2] for legal risk assessment</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03236 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+ | <strong>Status</strong>: ENACTED via HD01FiU48 (2026-04-21)</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax reduction
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2325,20 +2325,20 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — enacted law; primary source confirmed.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03238">HD03238<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03238"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03238 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: New environmental permitting authority
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen | <strong>Committee</strong>: MJU</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: Creates new agency to streamline environmental permitting (currently Naturvårdsverket). Addresses permit backlogs blocking renewable energy projects. DIW Score: 5.6/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>Implementation risk</strong>: New agency start-up — HIGH institutional risk (see implementation-feasibility.md)</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03239">HD03239<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03239"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03239 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Wind power municipal revenue-sharing law
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen | <strong>Committee</strong>: NU</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: Introduces mandatory revenue sharing between wind power developers and host municipalities. Addresses "not in my backyard" opposition. DIW Score: 5.8/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03240 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:240 — Ny ellag (New Electricity Act)
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>Legislative risk</strong>: MEDIUM — NU committee; majority present; no formal C/V/MP joint opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03246"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03246 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:246 — Ungdomsbrottslighet (Youth criminal sentencing)
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 6.2/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]
 <strong>Opposition</strong>: S+V+MP oppose on rehabilitation grounds. C silent.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd0399">HD0399<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd0399"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD0399 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L3</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:99 — Vårändringsbudget 2026
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2371,56 +2371,56 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd0399">HD0399<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
 <p><strong>Political risk</strong>: LOW — government majority holds; SD+M+KD+L = 176 seats. Opposition cannot defeat.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-cluster-remaining">cluster-remaining<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-remaining"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2 cluster</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules">HD03228 — Modernised Arms Export Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules">HD03228 — Modernised Arms Export Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: UU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 5.0 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]
 Opposition motions: HD024091 (V — stricter controls), HD024096 (MP — human rights conditionality)
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Updates Swedish arms export framework; modernises KIMAB oversight.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine">HD03232 — International Tribunal for Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine">HD03232 — International Tribunal for Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: UU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 5.2 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Sweden accedes to international tribunal mechanism for Ukraine war crimes accountability.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission">HD03231 — Ukraine Compensation Commission<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission">HD03231 — Ukraine Compensation Commission<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: UU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 4.5 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Sweden joins compensation mechanism for Ukrainian civilian losses.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy">HD03245 — Women's Rights Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy">HD03245 — Women's Rights Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: AU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 4.2 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>Tension</strong>: HD10438 interpellation notes women's shelters closing simultaneously — implementation gap.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules">HD03242 — Forestry Environmental Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules">HD03242 — Forestry Environmental Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: MJU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.8 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Revises forest environmental requirements; industry/NGO tension.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03237--paid-police-training">HD03237 — Paid Police Training<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03237--paid-police-training"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03237--paid-police-training">HD03237 — Paid Police Training<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03237--paid-police-training"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: JuU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.5 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Officers receive pay during training; addresses recruitment/retention gap.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03244--government-interoperability">HD03244 — Government Interoperability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03244--government-interoperability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03244--government-interoperability">HD03244 — Government Interoperability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03244--government-interoperability"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: TU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.2 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Mandates interoperability between government IT systems.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility">HD03233 — Medical Technology Accessibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility">HD03233 — Medical Technology Accessibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: SoU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.5 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Improves patient access to medical technologies; disability rights impact.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure">HD03243 — Tax Adjustment Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure">HD03243 — Tax Adjustment Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: SkU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.0 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Technical tax adjustment; low political salience.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-context">Election Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-context">Election Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: 2026-09-13 (Sunday)
 <strong>Days remaining</strong>: ~143 days from 2026-04-23
 <strong>Key session milestone</strong>: Riksmöte 2025/26 ends ~June 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result">Current Parliamentary Composition (Approximate — 2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result">Current Parliamentary Composition (Approximate — 2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2493,7 +2493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result">
 <p><strong>Opposition</strong> (S+V+C+MP): 107+24+24+18 = <strong>173 seats</strong></p>
 <p><em>Note: Approximate 2022 election results used; actual current composition may vary by 1–3 seats due to departures/by-elections. See Methodology Improvement 3.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications">Spring 2026 Package Electoral Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications">Spring 2026 Package Electoral Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2526,8 +2526,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications">Spring 2026 Package Elect
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Package</th><th>Electoral target group</th><th>Expected impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut (HD03236)</td><td>Rural/suburban commuters</td><td>Short-term relief narrative — returns credit to M/SD</td></tr><tr><td>Law &#x26; Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03235)</td><td>Crime-concerned suburban voters</td><td>Core SD+M voter consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Energy Transition (HD03240)</td><td>Energy-sector workers; liberal voters</td><td>Positions government as "investment-ready"</td></tr><tr><td>Women's rights strategy (HD03245)</td><td>Suburban women voters</td><td>Attempts to counter S framing on gender equality</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026">Coalition Viability Scenarios (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats">Scenario A: Tidökoalitionen continues (requires ~175+ seats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026">Coalition Viability Scenarios (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats">Scenario A: Tidökoalitionen continues (requires ~175+ seats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Current estimated seats: 176 (bare majority)</li>
 <li>If M gains 3–5 seats from delivering on fiscal promises: +3 seats</li>
@@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats">Scenario A:
 <li>If L holds (currently fragile at 16 seats — 4% threshold): critical</li>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: L polling near 4% threshold — loss of L would drop bloc to 160 seats</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority">Scenario B: S-led bloc majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority">Scenario B: S-led bloc majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Current: 173 seats</li>
 <li>If MP survives 4% threshold: stays at 18 seats</li>
@@ -2543,14 +2543,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority">Scenario B: S-led bloc majority<a cla
 <li>If C swings back toward centre-left: potentially +10–15 seats</li>
 <li><strong>Key swing factor</strong>: C — if C moves toward S collaboration, S-led bloc reaches 175+</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition">Scenario C: Cross-bloc grand coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition">Scenario C: Cross-bloc grand coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Only if A and B both fail to reach 175</li>
 <li>Historical precedent: Sweden has managed minority configurations but not grand coalitions in modern era</li>
 <li>Probability: Remote [D4]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-assessment">Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-risk-assessment">Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Party Electoral Risk (0=Safe, 10=High risk of seat loss)"
     x-axis ["S", "SD", "M", "V", "C", "KD", "MP", "L"]
@@ -2558,9 +2558,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-assessment">Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-
     bar [3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 5, 7, 8]</pre>
 <p><strong>Highest risk parties</strong>: L (threshold risk), MP (threshold risk), C (swing potential)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2620,7 +2620,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution<
 <p><strong>Majority threshold</strong>: 175 seats
 <strong>Government bloc</strong> (M+KD+L+SD): 176 — bare majority (+1)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills">Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills">Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2679,7 +2679,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills">Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th>Ja needed</th><th>Gov (M+KD+L+SD)</th><th>S</th><th>V</th><th>C</th><th>MP</th><th>Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03218 (gang sentences)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235 (deportation)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅ (if SD+C)</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>PASS if C neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399 (supplementary budget)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (electricity law)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅</td><td>TBD</td><td>Nej</td><td>TBD</td><td>Nej</td><td>LIKELY PASS</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: If C votes Nej on HD03235: Government = M+KD+L+SD = 176; C opposition adds to S+V+MP = 173+24 = 197 Nej. Government still has 176 vs 173 opposition bloc — <strong>passes if SD holds</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative">Sainte-Laguë Projection (September 2026 — Illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative">Sainte-Laguë Projection (September 2026 — Illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative"></a></h3>
 <p>Assuming 5% threshold applies. Illustrative scenarios only (no polling data — [D4]):</p>
 
 
@@ -2734,9 +2734,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative">Sainte-Laguë
 <p><strong>Key threshold risk</strong>: L at 16 seats (4.6% 2022 share) — if polls below 4% threshold, government loses L's 16 seats, dropping bloc to 160 (minority).</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [D4] — No polling data; pure structural projection.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2807,7 +2807,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Description</th><th>Key policy concern</th><th>Package impact</th><th>Likely shift</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural commuters</td><td>Households >50 km from city, car-dependent</td><td>Fuel costs, housing</td><td>✅ HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>Stable/slight M+SD gain</td></tr><tr><td>Urban professionals</td><td>Income >median, Stockholm/Gothenburg</td><td>Housing, climate</td><td>⚠️ Energy transition ambiguity</td><td>Possible M→C/S shift</td></tr><tr><td>Working class</td><td>Industrial/service workers, lower income</td><td>Job security, crime</td><td>✅ Law &#x26; order package</td><td>SD consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Younger urban</td><td>18–35, urban, climate-concerned</td><td>Climate, housing</td><td>❌ Fuel tax cut seen as rollback</td><td>MP+V→S flow possible</td></tr><tr><td>Senior citizens</td><td>65+, pension-dependent</td><td>Healthcare, care</td><td>✅ Medical technology access (HD03233)</td><td>Stable, slight KD benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Small business owners</td><td>SME, employer contributions</td><td>Tax burden</td><td>✅ Interpellation HD10444/HD10443 signals attention</td><td>Uncertain; S monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>Women (30–55)</td><td>Working mothers, suburban</td><td>Shelter access, pay equity</td><td>⚠️ Shelters closing despite strategy (HD10438)</td><td>Risk of S+C appeal</td></tr><tr><td>Rural/periphery</td><td>Northern Sweden, forestry/mining</td><td>Energy costs, regional development</td><td>✅ Energy package broadly positive</td><td>M+C stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-volatility-map">Electoral Volatility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-volatility-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-volatility-map">Electoral Volatility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-volatility-map"></a></h3>
 <p>High-volatility segments (most likely to switch):</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Young urban</strong> — 15% shift potential toward left-green bloc if climate framing dominates</li>
@@ -2816,21 +2816,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-volatility-map">Electoral Volatility Map<a class="" aria-hi
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Segment analysis derived from policy content + demographic inference; no direct polling data available (Gap G-2 in intelligence-assessment.md)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: strategic-extensions-methodology.md — comparative analysis</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-selection">Comparator Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-selection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-selection">Comparator Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-selection"></a></h3>
 <p>Two comparator jurisdictions selected per methodology requirements:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Norway (NO)</strong> — Nordic peer; similar energy economy, minority government history</li>
 <li><strong>Germany (DE)</strong> — Major EU member; recent coalition collapse and fiscal stress analogies</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-1-norway">Comparator 1: Norway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-norway"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-1-norway">Comparator 1: Norway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-norway"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h4>
 <p>Norway's Ap-Sp minority government under PM Jonas Gahr Støre faced energy price shock politics in 2022–24. The government implemented temporary electricity price subsidies (strømstøtte) directly analogous to Sweden's retroactive energy price support in HD01FiU48 and HD0399.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236">Key parallels with Swedish HD0399/HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236">Key parallels with Swedish HD0399/HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2875,10 +2875,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236">Key parallels with Swedish
 <p><strong>Key lesson</strong>: Norway's subsidy created dependency expectations — voters were disappointed when support was withdrawn. Sweden's time-limited fuel tax cut (ends after September 2026) faces similar political commitment trap.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Analogy based on structural similarity; Norway context from World Bank/OECD public reports.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-2-germany">Comparator 2: Germany<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-context-1">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-2-germany">Comparator 2: Germany<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-context-1">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's Ampelkoalition (SPD+Greens+FDP) collapsed in November 2024 over a budget dispute. FDP withdrew from coalition when SPD proposed debt brake suspension. Germany held snap elections February 2025, producing CDU/CSU-led coalition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics">Key parallels with Swedish SD support dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics">Key parallels with Swedish SD support dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2918,8 +2918,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics">Key parallels with Sw
 <p><strong>Key lesson</strong>: In the German case, the formal coalition structure made collapse structurally easier. Sweden's minority model (SD as confidence-and-supply) provides SD with exit without full accountability. This reduces (but does not eliminate) collapse risk — SD benefits from legislative outcomes without governing responsibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — Germany analogy well-documented in public sources (Bundestag records, ECFR analysis); applied to Swedish context as structural comparison.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-eu-policy-context">EU Policy Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-policy-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236">EU Climate Law vs HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-policy-context">EU Policy Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-policy-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236">EU Climate Law vs HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's fuel tax cut (82 öre/litre petrol) runs against EU Fit for 55 trajectory. EU Climate Law 2021/1119 requires progressive decarbonisation. While the measure does not formally violate current directives (Sweden retains national competence on fuel taxes until ETS2 2027), it sends a negative signal ahead of:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>ETS2 carbon pricing implementation (2027)</li>
@@ -2927,7 +2927,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236">EU Climate Law vs HD03236<a class="" aria-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Risk R-07</strong> in risk-assessment.md quantifies this at LOW probability of formal infringement proceedings, but political cost in EU Council may be non-trivial.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison">NATO Eastern Flank Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison">NATO Eastern Flank Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2962,9 +2962,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison">NATO Eastern Flank Comparison<a class=
 <p>Sweden's contribution is consistent with Allied commitments but smaller in scale than Germany's Lithuania brigade. Domestic debate about deployment size and legal basis (permanent vs rotational) tracked via HD03220 committee review.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session">Parallel 1: 2010 Alliansen Pre-Election Spring Session<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session">Parallel 1: 2010 Alliansen Pre-Election Spring Session<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: Spring 2010 — 5 months before September 2010 election
 <strong>Government</strong>: Alliansen (M+C+L+KD) under PM Fredrik Reinfeldt
 <strong>Structural similarity</strong>: Right-centre minority coalition; major fiscal package; SD entering parliament for first time in September 2010</p>
@@ -2978,7 +2978,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session">Parallel 1: 20
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: 7/10 — same pre-election spring delivery model; different substantive policy content (tax cuts vs fuel relief); SD now in support role rather than new entrant</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — well-documented Swedish electoral history</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021">Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Crisis 2021<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021">Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Crisis 2021<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: June 2021
 <strong>Government</strong>: S-MP minority under PM Stefan Löfven
 <strong>Event</strong>: No-confidence vote (misstroendevotum) carried in Riksdag when V withdrew support over HD clause reform</p>
@@ -2992,17 +2992,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021">Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Cri
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: 5/10 — parallel on confidence-supply risk; lower probability in 2026 given larger coalition base</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — direct Swedish parliamentary record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-applied">Lessons Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-applied">Lessons Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applied"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Pre-election "delivery" narratives can secure re-election (Alliansen 2010 precedent suggests yes — won September 2010)</li>
 <li>Single party defection in minority parliament was survivable in 2021; 2026 coalition has more buffer</li>
 <li>Fuel tax cuts as pre-election "gift" have Norwegian precedent of temporary relief → future reversal = political cost</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package">Feasibility Assessment by Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236">Package A: Spring Fiscal (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package">Feasibility Assessment by Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236">Package A: Spring Fiscal (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3041,7 +3041,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236">Package A: Spring Fis
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Risk</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative feasibility</td><td>HD03236 enacted; HD0399 pending FiU</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative capacity</td><td>Försäkringskassan must process retroactive energy reimbursements by summer</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal sustainability</td><td>4.1 bn SEK cost; fits within spring fiscal framework</td><td>LOW</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline to impact</td><td>Fuel tax cut immediate (April); retroactive energy support Q2</td><td>LOW</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall package feasibility</strong>: HIGH (HD03236 already enacted)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237">Package B: Law &#x26; Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235, HD03237)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237">Package B: Law &#x26; Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235, HD03237)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3080,7 +3080,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237">Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Risk</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative feasibility</td><td>All in committee; majority present for passage</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial implementation</td><td>Courts must apply new sentence rules; training required</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional test</td><td>HD03235 deportation may face ECHR proportionality review</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[C2]</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline to impact</td><td>Laws enacted by July 2026 earliest; effects 12–18 months</td><td>LOW</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall package feasibility</strong>: MEDIUM (legislative passage likely; implementation slower)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242">Package C: Energy Transition (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238, HD03242)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242">Package C: Energy Transition (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238, HD03242)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242">Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Risk</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative feasibility</td><td>NU + MJU committee review; majority present</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>New agency (HD03238)</td><td>Environmental permitting authority requires staffing, mandate clarity</td><td>HIGH (institutional)</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Electricity market reform (HD03240)</td><td>Grid expansion needed; Vattenfall/Energimarknadsinspektionen coordination</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind revenue sharing (HD03239)</td><td>Municipal revenue model needs regulation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall package feasibility</strong>: MEDIUM (legislative OK; implementation challenging, esp. new agency)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-implementation-risks-summary">Key Implementation Risks Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implementation-risks-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-implementation-risks-summary">Key Implementation Risks Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implementation-risks-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3153,15 +3153,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-implementation-risks-summary">Key Implementation Risks Summary<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Package</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ECHR/constitutional challenge to HD03235</td><td>Law &#x26; Order</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>New environmental permitting agency delayed</td><td>Energy Transition</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Försäkringskassan retroactive payment backlog</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>L threshold failure removes coalition partner</td><td>Cross-package</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2-C2] depending on dimension</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) per strategic-extensions-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>This document stress-tests the dominant assessment (Scenario S-1: Stable Close) by systematically examining three competing hypotheses. Each hypothesis is evaluated against available evidence.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-matrix">Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1">H-1: SD withdrawal is imminent (contradicts S-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-matrix">Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1">H-1: SD withdrawal is imminent (contradicts S-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis</strong>: SD will withdraw support before May 31, triggering a government confidence crisis.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3179,7 +3179,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1">H-1: SD withdrawal is
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: H-1 inconsistent with weight of evidence. [D4] confidence in H-1 being true.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government">H-2: Centre's (C) selective opposition is strategic — they will ultimately vote with government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government">H-2: Centre's (C) selective opposition is strategic — they will ultimately vote with government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis</strong>: C's formal opposing motions (HD024095 on HD03235) are positional theatre — they will ultimately support the government to preserve governing influence.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3196,7 +3196,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: H-2 partially consistent with evidence. [B2] confidence — C probably votes with government after token amendment, but not certain.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded">H-3: The fuel tax cut (HD03236) is already enacted — its political consequences are front-loaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded">H-3: The fuel tax cut (HD03236) is already enacted — its political consequences are front-loaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis</strong>: Because HD01FiU48 enacted the fuel tax cut on 2026-04-21, the political salience of this issue is already priced in. There will be no further material opposition effect in the remaining 38-day window.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3212,7 +3212,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-conseq
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: H-3 largely consistent — the immediate legislative risk is closed. Residual political risk persists at LOW level through election campaign. [A2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-consistency-matrix">ACH Consistency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-consistency-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-consistency-matrix">ACH Consistency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-consistency-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3262,18 +3262,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-consistency-matrix">ACH Consistency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence Item</th><th>H-1 (SD withdraws)</th><th>H-2 (C theatrics)</th><th>H-3 (Front-loaded)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SD stable support 2022–25</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218 delivered for SD</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>C filed HD024095 formally</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48 enacted 21 April</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition motions after enactment</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Interpellation wave (S × 6)</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Inconsistent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-conclusions">Conclusions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conclusions">Conclusions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusions"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S-1 (Stable Close) remains the dominant scenario</strong> — all three devil's advocate hypotheses either fail to dislodge it (H-1) or are partially compatible with it (H-2, H-3).</li>
 <li><strong>Highest residual risk</strong>: C tactical voting (H-2) — if C defects fully on HD03235, the deportation bill may fail. Probability: 10–15%.</li>
 <li><strong>Lowest risk domain</strong>: Fuel tax cut (H-3) — already enacted; legislative risk is closed.</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 7-dimension political classification per political-classification-guide.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-dimensions">Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-dimensions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-dimensions">Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-dimensions"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Issue Area</strong> (policy domain)</li>
 <li><strong>Ideological Positioning</strong> (left-right, libertarian-authoritarian)</li>
@@ -3284,7 +3284,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-dimensions">Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-
 <li><strong>Public Salience</strong> (elite / media / mass public)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3523,7 +3523,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Issue Area</th><th>Ideological Positioning</th><th>Legislative Stage</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Partisan Alignment</th><th>Constitutional</th><th>Public Salience</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Macro-fiscal</td><td>Right-Centre (growth + fiscal responsibility)</td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>CRITICAL — spring fiscal deadline</td><td>Coalition-sponsored</td><td>Framework (budget)</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Macro-fiscal supplementary</td><td>Right-Centre</td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>CRITICAL — immediate relief</td><td>Coalition-sponsored</td><td>Framework (budget)</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Energy/fiscal</td><td>Right/libertarian (tax cut)</td><td>ENACTED 2026-04-21 (HD01FiU48)</td><td>ENACTED</td><td>Coalition + SD</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Energy law</td><td>Centre-right (market reform)</td><td>Committee (NU)</td><td>HIGH — 2030 energy target</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Energy/local government</td><td>Centre (revenue sharing)</td><td>Committee (NU)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition + possible C</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Environmental/institutional</td><td>Centre-right (permitting reform)</td><td>Committee (MJU)</td><td>HIGH — permits backlog</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Justice/criminal</td><td>Right/authoritarian (harsher sentences)</td><td>Committee (JuU)</td><td>HIGH — election priority</td><td>Coalition + SD</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>High (crime)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Justice/youth</td><td>Right/authoritarian</td><td>Committee (JuU)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition + SD</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Justice/public service</td><td>Right/authoritarian (accountability)</td><td>Committee (KU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Migration</td><td>Far-right adjacent (mass deportation)</td><td>Committee (SfU)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition + SD, C opposition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>High (immigration)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>Defence/NATO</td><td>Centre-right (international obligations)</td><td>Committee (FöU)</td><td>HIGH — NATO Article 5</td><td>Coalition + possible S</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Defence/exports</td><td>Centre-right (rule-based)</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition; MP/V opposition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Foreign/Ukraine tribunal</td><td>Cross-partisan (human rights)</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Potentially bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Foreign/Ukraine compensation</td><td>Cross-partisan</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Potentially bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Gender equality / welfare</td><td>Centre</td><td>Committee (AU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition; concerns re implementation</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Forestry/environment</td><td>Centre-right (industry balance)</td><td>Committee (MJU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition; environmental NGO opposition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Justice/policing</td><td>Centre (institutional)</td><td>Committee (JuU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Digital/government</td><td>Centre (modernisation)</td><td>Committee (TU)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Social welfare</td><td>Centre-left (accessibility)</td><td>Committee (SoU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition + possible bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03243</td><td>Taxation</td><td>Centre-right</td><td>Committee (SkU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-issue-area-clustering">Issue Area Clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-area-clustering"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-issue-area-clustering">Issue Area Clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-area-clustering"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Issue Area Distribution (20 documents)
     "Fiscal/Budget" : 3
     "Justice/Crime" : 4
@@ -3534,7 +3534,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-issue-area-clustering">Issue Area Clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "Digital/Admin" : 1
     "Environment/Forestry" : 2</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ideological-spectrum-map">Ideological Spectrum Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-spectrum-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ideological-spectrum-map">Ideological Spectrum Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-spectrum-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Ideological Positioning (Right-Centre vs Authoritarian)"
     x-axis ["Libertarian", "Centre-Libertarian", "Centre", "Centre-Authoritarian", "Authoritarian"]
@@ -3543,7 +3543,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ideological-spectrum-map">Ideological Spectrum Map<a class="" aria-hi
     line [2, 3, 6, 7, 8]</pre>
 <p><strong>Key pattern</strong>: The 2025/26 spring package is distinctively right-of-centre on economic policy AND authoritarian-leaning on justice/migration — consistent with Tidöavtalet's SD-influenced agenda.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary">Constitutional Sensitivity Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary">Constitutional Sensitivity Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3571,12 +3571,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary">Constitutional Sensitivity Summar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th>Count</th><th>Examples</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional (ch. 8 RF)</td><td>1</td><td>HD01KU33 (digital seizure — requires second reading post-election)</td></tr><tr><td>Framework law (budget)</td><td>2</td><td>HD03100, HD0399</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law</td><td>17</td><td>All others</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: structural-metadata-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package">Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package">Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3610,7 +3610,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package">Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>Primary budget framework</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Supplementary budget (vårändringsbudget)</td><td>Implements HD03100</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax</td><td>Enacted via HD01FiU48 2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Finance Committee report — passed</td><td>Enacted outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Legislative chain</strong>: HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236 → HD01FiU48 (enacted)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--law--order-package">Cluster B — Law &#x26; Order Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--law--order-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--law--order-package">Cluster B — Law &#x26; Order Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--law--order-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3649,7 +3649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-b--law--order-package">Cluster B — Law &#x26; Order Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Double gang crime sentences</td><td>Core measure</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Youth offenders — stricter penalties</td><td>Supplementary</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Civil servant criminal liability</td><td>Institutional accountability</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Deportation for criminal convictions</td><td>Migration × justice nexus</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Paid police training</td><td>Enforcement capacity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Opposition motions against cluster</strong>: HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP) vs HD03235</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package">Cluster C — Energy Transition Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package">Cluster C — Energy Transition Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3683,7 +3683,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package">Cluster C — Energy Transition
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>New electricity law</td><td>Market framework</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power municipal revenue sharing</td><td>Local government incentive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Environmental permitting authority (new agency)</td><td>Permit reform</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Forestry environmental rules</td><td>Adjacent environmental reform</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Tension</strong>: HD03236 (fossil fuel tax cut) ↔ HD03240/HD03239 (renewable transition) — internal policy tension within coalition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs">Cluster D — Defence &#x26; Foreign Affairs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs">Cluster D — Defence &#x26; Foreign Affairs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3716,7 +3716,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs">Cluster D — Defence &#x26; For
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>Sweden military forward presence in Finland</td><td>NATO Article 5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernised arms export rules</td><td>Defence exports</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>International tribunal for Ukraine</td><td>Legal accountability</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Compensation commission for Ukraine</td><td>Reparations mechanism</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-e--social--welfare">Cluster E — Social &#x26; Welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--social--welfare"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-e--social--welfare">Cluster E — Social &#x26; Welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--social--welfare"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3744,7 +3744,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-e--social--welfare">Cluster E — Social &#x26; Welfare<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Women's rights strategy</td><td>Gender equality framework</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Medical technology accessibility</td><td>Healthcare equity</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Simplified parental benefit</td><td>Social insurance reform</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-diagram">Legislative Chain Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chain-diagram">Legislative Chain Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     HD03100["📋 HD03100\nVårproposition"] -->|informs| HD0399["📋 HD0399\nVårändringsbudget"]
     HD0399 -->|includes| HD03236["📋 HD03236\nFuel Tax Cut"]
@@ -3765,7 +3765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-diagram">Legislative Chain Diagram<a class="" aria-
     style HD03235 fill:#C62828,color:#FFFFFF
     style HD03240 fill:#F57F17,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders">Cross-Reference to Sibling Analysis Folders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders">Cross-Reference to Sibling Analysis Folders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier-C Aggregation Note</strong>: This is the first run of 2026-04-23. No prior-cycle sibling analysis folders exist under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/</code> at time of writing. When parallel workflows run (propositions, committee-reports, interpellations, evening-analysis), this cross-reference map should be updated to link:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> — single-type proposition analysis</li>
@@ -3781,7 +3781,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders">Cross-Reference to Sibli
 <li>PIR-7 (Election 2026): Active — all packages interpreted through election lens</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-interpellation--minister-mapping">Interpellation → Minister Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation--minister-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-interpellation--minister-mapping">Interpellation → Minister Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation--minister-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3861,7 +3861,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-interpellation--minister-mapping">Interpellation → Minister Mapping
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interpellation</th><th>Filed by</th><th>Target Minister</th><th>Policy Cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — employer contributions</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — SME</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — family debt</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>S</td><td>Justice (Strömmer)</td><td>Justice — cybercrime</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>S</td><td>Justice (Strömmer)</td><td>Justice — police gaps</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>S</td><td>Equality</td><td>Social — women's shelters</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>S</td><td>Labour</td><td>Social — pay transparency</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>S</td><td>Infrastructure (Carlson)</td><td>Housing — construction shortfall</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — SME</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>S</td><td>Energy</td><td>Energy — district heating</td></tr><tr><td>HD10428</td><td>M</td><td>Infrastructure</td><td>Transport — emergency airport</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping">Opposing Motions → Proposition Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping">Opposing Motions → Proposition Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3929,9 +3929,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping">Opposing Motions → Propositi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Filed by</th><th>Against</th><th>Policy Cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td></tr><tr><td>HD024087</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03229</td><td>Environment</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>V</td><td>HD03235 deportation</td><td>Migration/Justice</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>V</td><td>HD03228 arms</td><td>Defence</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>V</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>C</td><td>HD03235 deportation</td><td>Migration</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03228 arms</td><td>Defence</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03235 deportation</td><td>Migration</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax</td><td>Climate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>ICD 203 establishes 9 analytic standards. Below is the audit for this analysis:</p>
 
 
@@ -4001,7 +4001,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Standard</th><th>Requirement</th><th>Self-Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1 Objectivity</td><td>Sources treated impartially; analyst bias minimised</td><td>PASS</td><td>All parties treated in stakeholder matrix; coalition and opposition positions documented equally</td></tr><tr><td>S-2 Independence</td><td>Analysis not shaped by desired outcome</td><td>PASS</td><td>Devils-advocate confirms S-1 against 3 hypotheses; alternate scenarios assigned explicit probabilities</td></tr><tr><td>S-3 Timeliness</td><td>Analysis delivered in time to inform decisions</td><td>PASS</td><td>Delivered 2026-04-23 — covers 38-day window through session end</td></tr><tr><td>S-4 Based on all available information</td><td>All open-source data considered</td><td>PARTIAL — Calendar API returned HTML; committee hearing dates not confirmed. Gap documented in intelligence-assessment.md</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-5 Properly distinguished from advocacy</td><td>Analysis separated from policy preference</td><td>PASS</td><td>Neutral framing; opposition and government positions reported equally</td></tr><tr><td>S-6 Communicates uncertainty</td><td>WEP + Admiralty codes on all key judgments</td><td>PASS — All 5 KJs have explicit WEP + Admiralty + Kent %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-7 Employs alternative analysis</td><td>≥3 ACH hypotheses; scenario alternatives</td><td>PASS — 3 devils-advocate hypotheses; 3 scenarios</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-8 Tradecraft transparency</td><td>Methodology documented</td><td>PASS — This document</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-9 Self-critique</td><td>Limitations acknowledged</td><td>PASS — See §Limitations below</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall rating</strong>: 8/9 — S-4 partial due to calendar API failure.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Required)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Required)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4093,21 +4093,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Req
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Technique</th><th>Applied In</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td><td>Explicit assumption: SD support stable</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td><td>3 hypotheses with consistency matrix</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>5S+4W+4O+4T with TOWS matrix</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Red Team Analysis</td><td>devils-advocate.md H-1 (SD withdrawal test)</td><td>Stress-tests dominant view</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>3 scenarios, probabilities sum to 100%</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Influence diagrams / network mapping</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>Mermaid influence graph</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Risk Matrix</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>10-item 5×5 heat map</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Attack Tree</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>ET-01 interpellation campaign tree</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Kill Chain</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>LT-01 budget defeat chain</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Historical Analogy</td><td>comparative-international.md</td><td>Norway strømstøtte; German Ampel coalition</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>DIW Weighting</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>15 documents ranked 1.0–8.6</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Admiralty Coding</td><td>All artifact headers</td><td>[A-F][1-6] on every evidence item</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>WEP / Kent Scale</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td><td>7-band WEP on all KJs</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-identified">Methodology Improvements Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-identified"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time committee schedule integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-identified">Methodology Improvements Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-identified"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time committee schedule integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Problem</strong>: The analysis cannot identify precise chamber vote dates because the Riksdag calendar API returned HTML rather than JSON. This creates a timing gap — we know bills are in committee but not when they come to a floor vote.<br>
 <strong>Recommendation</strong>: Implement a retry/fallback parser for the calendar endpoint that handles HTML responses; or periodically scrape the public calendar page for key bills.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Would improve TIMELINESS (S-3) and enable forward indicators with precise dates.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration">Improvement 2: Swedish opinion poll data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration">Improvement 2: Swedish opinion poll data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Problem</strong>: The election-2026-analysis.md and voter-segmentation.md artifacts rely on document-derived inferences for voter sentiment, not actual polling data. No Swedish polling MCP tool is currently available.<br>
 <strong>Recommendation</strong>: Integrate a public polls aggregator (e.g., Wikipedia Swedish polls page or Statistikon.se) into the download pipeline.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Would improve KEY JUDGMENTS confidence by grounding KJ-1 and KJ-2 in real voter sentiment data.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference">Improvement 3: Riksdag vote record cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference">Improvement 3: Riksdag vote record cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Problem</strong>: The coaliti on-mathematics.md seat table uses approximate figures (M≈69, S≈105, SD≈73) rather than verified current Riksdag membership. Vacancies, absences, or changes since election could affect pivotal vote counts.<br>
 <strong>Recommendation</strong>: Call <code>get_ledamot</code> API for all 349 current seats and compute exact party tallies; cross-reference with known departures/appointments.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Would improve PRECISION of coalition mathematics and avoid reporting approximation as fact.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-limitations">Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-limitations">Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Calendar API failure</strong>: Committee hearing dates and floor vote dates are approximate/inferred. See G-1 in intelligence-assessment.md.</li>
 <li><strong>No polling data</strong>: Public opinion analysis uses structural/legislative inference, not survey data.</li>
@@ -4115,7 +4115,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-limitations">Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 <li><strong>Tier-C aggregation</strong>: This is the first run on this date. No prior-cycle sibling analysis folders existed at run time. Cross-reference-map.md documents this limitation.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis applies OSINT methodology per ICD 203, using:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Source authority</strong>: Riksdag API (primary), World Bank data, published motions/interpellations</li>
@@ -4125,7 +4125,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-month-ahead
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24810574623
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-23T01:00:00Z
@@ -4133,7 +4133,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Effective Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Lookback Window</strong>: Current session riksmöte 2025/26 (recent 30 days)
 <strong>Analysis Period</strong>: 2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31 (38 days)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability">MCP Server Availability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-availability">MCP Server Availability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4164,7 +4164,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability">MCP Server Availability<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Server</th><th>Status</th><th>Retries</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdag-regering</td><td>✅ Live</td><td>0</td><td><code>get_sync_status</code> 200, sources live</td></tr><tr><td>world-bank</td><td>✅ Live</td><td>0</td><td>GDP growth + inflation retrieved</td></tr><tr><td>scb</td><td>Not queried</td><td>—</td><td>Not required for month-ahead scope</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3">Primary Legislative Corpus (Propositions — L2/L2+/L3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3">Primary Legislative Corpus (Propositions — L2/L2+/L3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4339,7 +4339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3">Primary Legislative
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Department</th><th>Date</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget för 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt, el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner — lag om intäktsdelning</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Dubbla straff för brott i kriminella nätverk</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-09</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Utökat straffrättsligt tjänstemannaansvar</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-09</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>Svenskt bidrag till Natos framskjutna närvaro i Finland</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-09</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernt regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sveriges tillträde — internationell skadeståndskommission Ukraina</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Sveriges anslutning — tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet vid datadelning inom offentlig förvaltning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>prop</td><td>Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdept</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>En betald polisutbildning</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Nationell strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>skr</td><td>Arbetsmarknadsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Regler mot bedrägerier via elektroniska kommunikationer</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03243</td><td>Förbättrade regler för tonnagebeskattning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending">Committee Reports (Betänkanden — Recently Passed or Pending)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending">Committee Reports (Betänkanden — Recently Passed or Pending)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4402,7 +4402,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending">Committee
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Committee</th><th>Date</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt + el-/gasprisstöd</td><td>FiU</td><td>2026-04-21</td><td>✅ Passed</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i beslagtagna digitala handlingar (vilande grundlagsändring)</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Dormant (1st reading)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för media (vilande grundlagsändring)</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Dormant (1st reading)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>✅ Passed</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart, skydd mot kringgåenden av BRL</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>✅ Passed</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>En statlig e-legitimation</td><td>TU</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Pending vote</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Reformering av avfallslagstiftning</td><td>MJU</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Pending vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals">Key Opposition Motions (Against Government Proposals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals">Key Opposition Motions (Against Government Proposals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4475,7 +4475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals">Key Opposition M
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Party</th><th>Against</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>V</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>V</td><td>HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>C</td><td>HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03228 arms regulation</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>V</td><td>HD03228 arms regulation</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024087</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03229 reception law</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD024080</td><td>S</td><td>HD03229 reception law</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days">Active Interpellations (Selected — Past 14 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days">Active Interpellations (Selected — Past 14 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4552,7 +4552,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days">Active Interpellations
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Topic</th><th>Party</th><th>To Minister</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar</td><td>S</td><td>Finance/Svantesson</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Arbetsgivaravgifter — utnyttjande av sänkning</td><td>S</td><td>Finance/Svantesson</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>S</td><td>Civil/Slottner</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td>S</td><td>Justice/Strömmer</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>S</td><td>Equality/Larsson</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet</td><td>S</td><td>Equality/Larsson</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>Bostadsbyggandet i Stockholmsregionen</td><td>S</td><td>Infrastructure/Carlson</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>Bred skatteöversyn</td><td>S</td><td>Finance/Svantesson</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>Statligt säkerställande — investeringar i vårdbyggnader</td><td>S</td><td>Health/Lann</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden">Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden">Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4580,7 +4580,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden">Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>2024</th><th>2023</th><th>2022</th><th>2021</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP Growth (%)</td><td>0.82</td><td>-0.20</td><td>1.26</td><td>5.23</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation CPI (%)</td><td>2.84</td><td>8.55</td><td>8.37</td><td>2.16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4607,13 +4607,51 @@ <h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c">Reference Analyses (Sibli
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Status</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/</td><td>Prior cycle</td><td>Not yet available — no prior analysis folders found</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/propositions/</td><td>Prior cycle</td><td>Not yet available</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/</td><td>Prior cycle</td><td>Not yet available</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Completeness</strong>: 20 primary documents retrieved, covering all major policy domains</li>
 <li><strong>Depth distribution</strong>: L3 (2), L2+ (9), L2 (9)</li>
 <li><strong>Calendar API</strong>: HTML error (known issue) — calendar data inferred from document submission dates and standard Riksdag spring session norms</li>
 <li><strong>Full-text</strong>: Available for all listed propositions via riksdagen.se</li>
 <li><strong>Session context</strong>: Riksmöte 2025/26 spring session ends June 2026; ~38 days of parliamentary activity covered</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03217-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03218-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03220-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4671,7 +4709,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:09.928Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:31.410Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html b/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html
index 0906d2b926..f6f8363fcb 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.127Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.624Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.127Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.624Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary","description":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with three interlocking packages dominating the legislative agenda: the 2026 Spring Fiscal Package (HD03100 vårproposition +…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:10.127Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03217-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03218-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03220-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary","description":"Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with three interlocking packages dominating the legislative agenda: the 2026 Spring Fiscal Package (HD03100 vårproposition +…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:31.624Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-month-ahead-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03217-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03218-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03220-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD0399-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,22 +216,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: Public | <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Period</strong>: 2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31 | <strong>Session</strong>: Riksmöte 2025/26 (final spring phase)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden enters the final five weeks of the 2025/26 parliamentary session with three interlocking packages dominating the legislative agenda: the 2026 Spring Fiscal Package (HD03100 vårproposition + HD0399 supplementary budget), a Law &#x26; Order Package consolidating the Tidöavtalet's criminal justice agenda, and an Energy Transition Package restructuring the electricity market. All three packages will receive final votes before the summer recess, with the vårproposition setting Sweden's fiscal trajectory through a pre-election period of moderate economic recovery and heightened defence spending.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [B2 — official government documents, riksdagen.se sources]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial priority-setting</strong>: Which legislative package deserves the deepest coverage during the April-May 2026 session? (Answer: Spring Fiscal Package — broadest societal impact, sets 2026-2027 parameters)</li>
 <li><strong>Political risk monitoring</strong>: Where are the most significant coalition stress points likely to emerge before the September 2026 election?</li>
 <li><strong>Forward-watch triggers</strong>: Which indicators signal that the governing coalition is gaining or losing momentum ahead of the autumn campaign?</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fiscal</strong>: Vårproposition HD03100 projects continued recovery (GDP growth recovering from -0.20% in 2023 to 0.82% in 2024); defence spending elevated; energy cost relief via HD03236 (fuel tax cut May–September 2026, energy price support Jan–Feb 2026 retroactively); net fiscal cost ~4.1 billion SEK. Riksdagen's Finance Committee (FiU) already passed HD01FiU48 on 2026-04-21.</li>
 <li><strong>Justice</strong>: HD03218 (double sentences for gang crime), HD03246 (youth offenders), HD03217 (civil servant liability), HD03235 (deportation) — all scheduled for spring votes. V, C, and MP have filed opposing motions on deportation; V and MP oppose arms regulation changes.</li>
@@ -240,10 +240,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Housing/Urban</strong>: HD01CU28 (national condominium register, effective 2027) and HD01CU27 (property identity requirements, effective 2026-07-01) both passed 2026-04-17.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔑 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔑 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Watch</strong>: Riksdagen vote on HD0399 Vårändringsbudget (expected late May 2026) — if S, V, MP, and C vote against the budget jointly, this signals maximum pre-election opposition unity and provides electoral narrative heading into summer.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-priority-ranking">📊 DIW Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-priority-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-priority-ranking">📊 DIW Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-priority-ranking"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Document Significance — Month Ahead April-May 2026
     x-axis Low Electoral Impact --> High Electoral Impact
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-priority-ranking">📊 DIW Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidd
     style HD03245 fill:#4A148C,color:#FFFFFF
     style HD03242 fill:#00695C,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-profile">🔒 Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-profile"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-profile">🔒 Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-profile"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Overall assessment confidence</strong>: HIGH</li>
 <li><strong>Economic data confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (World Bank 2024 data, vårproposition not yet full-text parsed)</li>
@@ -279,14 +279,14 @@ <h2 id="rm--confidence-profile">🔒 Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty Code</strong>: [B2] — Reliable source, confirmed by multiple independent parliamentary documents</p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23 | <strong>Period</strong>: Apr 23 – May 31, 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative">Lead Story: Spring Fiscal Package Sets Pre-Election Economic Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative">Lead Story: Spring Fiscal Package Sets Pre-Election Economic Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-spring-fiscal-package-sets-pre-election-economic-narrative"></a></h3>
 <p>The Tidökoalition's 2026 Spring Fiscal Package — comprising HD03100 (vårproposition), HD0399 (vårändringsbudget), and HD03236 (extra ändringsbudget, already passed 2026-04-21 via HD01FiU48) — is the most consequential legislative cluster of the spring session. Sweden's GDP growth recovered from -0.20% in 2023 to 0.82% in 2024 (World Bank), and Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson's vårproposition charts a course toward continued but cautious recovery. The extra ändringsbudget cuts energy tax on petrol and diesel by 82 öre/litre and 319 SEK/m³ respectively for May–September 2026, costing approximately 1.56 billion SEK in lost revenue while providing ~2.4 billion SEK in energy price support — net fiscal deterioration of ~4.1 billion SEK in 2026. The Middle East conflict and high electricity prices in early 2026 are cited as justification [HD01FiU48, B2].</p>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: L3 (highest priority) [A1 — primary government documents, parliamentary confirmed]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
     subgraph PKG1["💰 Spring Fiscal Package (L3)"]
         FP["HD03100 Vårproposition&#x3C;br/>Economic policy framework 2026-27"]
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a cl
     style NA fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF
     style KM fill:#2E7D32,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -421,15 +421,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>DIW Tier</th><th>Priority Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 Ekonomisk vårproposition</td><td>L3</td><td>Sets entire fiscal framework through election</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>L3</td><td>Modifies spending structure for 2026</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD03218</td><td>Dubbla straff — kriminella nätverk</td><td>L2+</td><td>High political salience, election-year flagship</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>L2+</td><td>Structural reform of electricity market</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler</td><td>L2+</td><td>Contested — V/C/MP opposition motions filed</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03220</td><td>NATO framskjuten närvaro Finland</td><td>L2+</td><td>Security significance, bipartisan support</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>L2+</td><td>Revenue redistribution, rural–urban impact</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>L2+</td><td>Pre-election gender equality commitment</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Unga lagöverträdare</td><td>L2+</td><td>Juvenile justice reform, politically salient</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03217</td><td>Utökat tjänstemannaansvar</td><td>L2+</td><td>Rule of law reform, broad support expected</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-synthesis">Thematic Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-synthesis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management">Theme 1: Pre-Election Fiscal Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-synthesis">Thematic Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-synthesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management">Theme 1: Pre-Election Fiscal Management<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-pre-election-fiscal-management"></a></h4>
 <p>The government faces a classic pre-election dilemma: demonstrate competent stewardship while providing voter-visible relief. The fuel tax cut (82 öre/litre on petrol) directly targets working-class and rural voters who depend on private transport. Critics from S, V, and MP argue this contradicts climate commitments and is fiscally irresponsible. The vårproposition must balance defence spending growth (NATO commitments) with popular relief measures amid a fiscal framework whose surplus target becomes politically relevant if overshoot signals austerity.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform">Theme 2: Law &#x26; Order Election Platform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform">Theme 2: Law &#x26; Order Election Platform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-law--order-election-platform"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidöavtalet's criminal justice agenda achieves its most concentrated legislative expression in May 2026. Double sentences for gang crime, stricter youth offender rules, expanded public servant accountability, and tighter deportation rules collectively form the government's most politically coherent package. With SD's support secured, these measures will pass — but V, C (partially), and MP opposition creates a clear left-right cleavage the Social Democrats can exploit.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation">Theme 3: Energy Market Transformation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation">Theme 3: Energy Market Transformation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-energy-market-transformation"></a></h4>
 <p>The electricity laws package (HD03240) represents the most structurally significant legislation of the session. New market architecture, a dedicated environmental permitting authority (replacing regional boards for large projects), and mandatory revenue-sharing for wind power municipalities alter the investment landscape for both renewable energy and fossil fuel alternatives.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Suggested SEO title</strong>: "Sweden's Parliament: Five Weeks of Budget, Crime, and Energy Votes Before Summer Recess"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description (158 chars)</strong>: "Swedish parliament votes on the spring fiscal package, gang crime double penalties, and electricity market reform in the final five weeks before the 2026 election campaign."</li>
@@ -437,12 +437,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>Secondary keywords</strong>: vårproposition 2026, Swedish election 2026, Swedish energy reform</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC — Offentlighetsprincipen basis; data from open Riksdag sources
 <strong>Framework</strong>: osint-tradecraft-standards.md — Key Judgments, Admiralty, WEP, PIR handoff</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>KJ-1</strong> (Likely / [B2]): The Tidökoalitionen will complete the 2025/26 spring session with its three core legislative packages (Spring Fiscal, Law &#x26; Order, Energy Transition) largely intact, giving PM Kristersson a "delivery" narrative ahead of the September 2026 general election.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <p><strong>KJ-5</strong> (Unlikely / [C3]): An external shock (Russian escalation, energy price spike, IMF growth revision) will force an emergency pivot in the spring session — the current probability is Remote to Unlikely; Sweden's fiscal buffers and NATO membership reduce vulnerability.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-profile">Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-profile"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-profile-1">Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-profile-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-profile">Confidence Profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KJ</th><th>WEP Band</th><th>Kent %</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1</td><td>Likely</td><td>60–70%</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Coalition parliamentary record 2022–26; Riksdag vote counts</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2</td><td>Roughly even</td><td>40–50%</td><td>[C2]</td><td>C motion HD024095; historical C voting patterns</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3</td><td>Very likely</td><td>80–90%</td><td>[B1]</td><td>11 interpellations identified; S party strategy documents</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-4</td><td>Very likely</td><td>80–90%</td><td>[B2]</td><td>Norway analogy (Comparator 1); public opinion polling patterns</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-5</td><td>Unlikely</td><td>15–25%</td><td>[C3]</td><td>Geopolitical baseline assessment; no confirmed indicators</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingestion (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Carried-forward PIRs from prior analytical cycle</strong>:</p>
 <p>This analysis is the first run of the 2026-04-23 period. No prior-cycle month-ahead analysis exists under <code>analysis/daily/</code> for the month of March 2026 within this repository. PIRs below are reconstructed from standing requirements:</p>
 
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-Cycle PIR Ingesti
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Standing Requirement</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1</td><td>Budget/fiscal track — Monitor vårproposition</td><td>RESOLVED — HD03100 + HD0399 filed; HD01FiU48 enacted. Fiscal stimulus confirmed.</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2</td><td>Justice/gang crime — Monitor law &#x26; order package</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03218 + HD03246 in committee; passage expected May–June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3</td><td>Energy transition — New electricity law</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03240 + HD03239 in committee NU</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4</td><td>NATO/defence — Forward presence</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03220 in FöU committee</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5</td><td>Migration — Deportation rules</td><td>ACTIVE — HD03235 in SfU; opposition motions filed</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6</td><td>Ukraine — Legal accountability</td><td>PARTIALLY RESOLVED — HD03232 + HD03231 filed; proceedings stage</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7</td><td>Election 2026 — Legislative legacy formation</td><td>ACTIVE — all packages interpreted through Sept 2026 lens</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence Gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gap</th><th>Description</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>G-1</td><td>Committee hearing schedules not confirmed</td><td>Cannot pinpoint exact vote dates for HD03218, HD03235, HD03240</td></tr><tr><td>G-2</td><td>SD internal deliberations on HD03235</td><td>No public record of SD group vote; inference only</td></tr><tr><td>G-3</td><td>C position post-HD024095 rejection</td><td>C may shift position without public announcement</td></tr><tr><td>G-4</td><td>Riksbank monetary policy path Q2–Q3 2026</td><td>May interact with fiscal stimulus; direction uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>G-5</td><td>Sweden Q1 2026 GDP print</td><td>Not yet available; World Bank 2024 data used; actual may differ</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle">Collection Requirements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle">Collection Requirements for Next Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Monitor C parliamentary group statements on HD03235 (weekly)</li>
 <li>Monitor JuU committee hearing schedule for HD03218 (next 2 weeks)</li>
@@ -606,9 +606,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-collection-requirements-for-next-cycle">Collection Requirements for N
 <li>Track NATO/SACEUR announcements on HD03220 deployment timeline</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scoring-framework"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-scoring-framework">DIW Scoring Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Description</th><th>Weight</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>D — Depth</strong></td><td>Political complexity, institutional reach</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>I — Immediate Impact</strong></td><td>Direct policy effect within 30–90 days</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>W — Width</strong></td><td>Number of constituencies, parties, sectors affected</td><td>30%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-diw-scores">Ranked DIW Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-diw-scores"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-diw-scores">Ranked DIW Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-diw-scores"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -821,12 +821,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-diw-scores">Ranked DIW Scores<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>D</th><th>I</th><th>W</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 Ekonomisk vårproposition</td><td>9</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td><strong>9.65</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03100; World Bank GDP -0.20%→+0.82%</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td><strong>9.00</strong></td><td>L3</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD0399; 4.1 bn SEK net fiscal impact</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD03218</td><td>Dubbla straff — kriminella nätverk</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td>8</td><td><strong>8.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03218; HD024092/HD024091 opposing motions</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.70</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03240; electricity market restructuring</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta utvisningsregler</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>HD024090/HD024095/HD024097 opposing motions</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03220</td><td>NATO framskjuten närvaro Finland</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03220; bipartisan support context</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03239; revenue redistribution</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>8</td><td><strong>7.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03245; HD10438 interpellation context</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler — unga lagöverträdare</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.65</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03246; youth justice reform</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03217</td><td>Utökat tjänstemannaansvar</td><td>7</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>6.65</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03217; accountability framework</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet — datadelning</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td><strong>6.35</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03244; digital government reform</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernt regelverk krigsmateriel</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td><strong>6.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>HD024096/HD024091 opposing motions</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>7</td><td><strong>6.00</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03242; rural constituencies</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget (fuel/energy)</td><td>7</td><td>9</td><td>7</td><td><strong>7.70</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td>HD01FiU48 PASSED 2026-04-21; 4.1 bn SEK impact</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td><strong>5.70</strong></td><td>L2</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03238</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: HD03236 scored high on Immediate Impact but ranking depressed by the fact it already passed (HD01FiU48)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If vårproposition projects GDP contraction</strong>: Significance of HD03100 rises to DIW 10.0 — entire fiscal framework under threat, opposition gains electoral momentum.</p>
 <p><strong>If V/C/MP succeed in opposing utvisningsregler</strong>: DIW score of HD03235 rises to 9.0 — coalition faces first significant legislative defeat of spring session.</p>
 <p><strong>If energy prices remain elevated through May</strong>: DIW score of HD03240 rises to 9.0 — immediate market relevance amplified.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-distribution">Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-distribution">Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Distribution — Month Ahead 2026-04-23"
     x-axis ["HD03100", "HD0399", "HD03218", "HD03236", "HD03240", "HD03235", "HD03220", "HD03239", "HD03245", "HD03246"]
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-significance-distribution">Significance Distribution<a class="" aria-
 
 %%{init: {'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1565C0', 'secondaryColor': '#C62828', 'tertiaryColor': '#2E7D32', 'edgeLabelBackground': '#FFFFFF', 'fontSize': '14px'}}}%%</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-improvement-notes">Pass-2 Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-improvement-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-improvement-notes">Pass-2 Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-improvement-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Evidence Admiralty codes added to each ranked item</li>
 <li>Sensitivity analysis expanded to three scenarios</li>
@@ -843,9 +843,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-pass-2-improvement-notes">Pass-2 Improvement Notes<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>DIW weights explicitly defined and applied consistently [Methodology per synthesis-methodology.md]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-party-framing-map">Party Framing Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-framing-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-framing-map">Party Framing Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-framing-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-framing-map">Party Framing Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Core narrative frame</th><th>Key evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (government)</td><td>"Delivery — we promised, we delivered"</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; three packages in progress</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>"Not enough — immigration enforcement must be total"</td><td>May file reservations if HD03235 deemed insufficient</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>"Pro-family, pro-safety"</td><td>Women's strategy (HD03245); crime package</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>"Energy transition + security"</td><td>HD03240, HD03239, HD03220</td></tr><tr><td>S (opposition)</td><td>"Government manages crises without structural solutions"</td><td>6+ interpellations on housing, shelters, police</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>"Climate and workers first"</td><td>3 opposing motions: fuel, deportation, arms</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>"Climate emergency requires reversal of fuel tax"</td><td>HD024098; EU Climate Law framing</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>"Moderate reform — not extreme immigration"</td><td>HD024095 systematic crime threshold</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-press-framing-expected">Press Framing (Expected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-framing-expected"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-press-framing-expected">Press Framing (Expected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-framing-expected"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-press-framing-expected">Press Framing (Expected)<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Media type</th><th>Expected angle</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Svenska Dagbladet (conservative)</td><td>Delivery narrative; coalition stability</td><td>Editorial alignment with M/coalition</td></tr><tr><td>Dagens Nyheter (liberal)</td><td>Mixed — energy transition positive; deportation concerns</td><td>Liberal editorial line</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet (tabloid/social-dem)</td><td>Opposition amplification — shelters, housing</td><td>Social Democratic-adjacent</td></tr><tr><td>SVT/SR (public)</td><td>Balanced — covers all parties; committee hearing focus</td><td>PSB mandate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-media-risk-indicators">Media Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-risk-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-media-risk-indicators">Media Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-risk-indicators"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Women's shelter story</strong> (HD10438) — high viral potential; human interest angle; negative for government</li>
 <li><strong>Fuel tax cut = climate betrayal</strong> framing — sustained NGO campaign likely through summer</li>
@@ -939,12 +939,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-media-risk-indicators">Media Risk Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — media framing projections; no actual press coverage reviewed (open-access Swedish press not queried)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder impact matrix per stakeholder-impact.md template</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-6-lenses">6 Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lenses"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix">Stakeholder Impact Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-impact-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-6-lenses">6 Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lenses"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Government/Coalition</strong> — Tidökoalitionen (M+KD+L+SD support)</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition</strong> — S, V, MP, C (outside coalition)</li>
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-6-lenses">6 Lenses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><strong>Civil Society</strong> — NGOs, employers, trade unions, media</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition">Lens 1: Government/Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition">Lens 1: Government/Coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-governmentcoalition">Lens 1: Government/Coalition<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td><td>Government leader</td><td>Drives spring agenda; responsible for all three packages</td><td>Positive — packages align with Tidöavtalet commitments</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Fiscal principal</td><td>Vårproposition (HD03100) + extra ändringsbudget (HD03236); targeted by 3 interpellations (HD10444, HD10442, HD10433)</td><td>Defensive on fiscal tightness; proactive on recovery narrative</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Justice package lead</td><td>HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235 — full law &#x26; order package</td><td>Strong proponent; targeted by HD10439 and HD10441 interpellations</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Climate/Energy Minister Johan Britz (L)</td><td>Energy reform lead</td><td>HD03239, HD03240, HD03238 — energy and climate agenda</td><td>Balancing renewable growth with fossil fuel relief (tension noted)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD parliamentary group</td><td>Coalition support</td><td>Pivotal support for law &#x26; order package; may seek concessions</td><td>Broadly supportive; monitors if measures "strong enough"</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Housing/transport</td><td>Targeted by HD10434 (housing shortfall) and HD10428 (emergency airport)</td><td>Defensive — housing construction shortfall in Stockholm region noted</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition">Lens 2: Opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-opposition">Lens 2: Opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition">Lens 2: Opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Social Democrats (S)</td><td>Main opposition</td><td>Filed most active interpellation campaign in session (6+ in 14 days): HD10444, HD10443, HD10439, HD10438, HD10434, HD10433</td><td>Coordinated offensive — economy, justice, housing, gender equality</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>Left opposition</td><td>Opposing HD03235 (HD024090), HD03228 (HD024091), HD03236 (HD024092)</td><td>Hard opposition — strongest critic of fuel tax cut and deportation</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>Green opposition</td><td>Opposing HD03236 (HD024098), HD03228 (HD024096), HD03235 (HD024097), HD03229 (HD024087)</td><td>Climate-framed opposition — most motions relate to environment and rights</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>Centrist opposition</td><td>Partially opposing HD03235 (HD024095 — requires "systematic and repeated" crime threshold)</td><td>Selective opposition — moderate position on deportation, pro-NATO</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-citizens">Lens 3: Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-citizens"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-citizens">Lens 3: Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-citizens"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-citizens">Lens 3: Citizens<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Impact</th><th>Concern</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural drivers/commuters</td><td>✅ Benefit from 82 öre/litre petrol cut (May–Sep 2026)</td><td>Relief temporary — returns after September</td><td>[A1] — HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Households with heating costs</td><td>✅ Retroactive energy price support for Jan–Feb 2026</td><td>Already paid; relief via Försäkringskassan reimbursement mechanism</td><td>[A1] — HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>Victims of gang crime</td><td>✅ Double sentences reduce repeat offending risk</td><td>Implementation timeline unclear</td><td>[A2] — HD03218</td></tr><tr><td>Youth offenders</td><td>⚠️ Stricter penalties — rehabilitation concerns raised by V/S</td><td>Disproportionate impact on socioeconomically vulnerable youth</td><td>[B2] — HD03246 + motions</td></tr><tr><td>Women facing domestic violence</td><td>⚠️ Strategy (HD03245) published but shelters closing (HD10438)</td><td>Implementation gap between strategy and real-world provision</td><td>[A2] — HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>Municipalities hosting wind turbines</td><td>✅ Revenue-sharing law (HD03239) — new income stream</td><td>Revenue percentage not specified in available summary</td><td>[A2] — HD03239</td></tr><tr><td>Property buyers</td><td>✅ Condominium register (HD01CU28) — greater market transparency</td><td>Implementation not until 2027</td><td>[A1] — HD01CU28</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-international-actors">Lens 4: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-international-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-international-actors">Lens 4: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-international-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-international-actors">Lens 4: International Actors<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>NATO (Supreme Headquarters)</td><td>HD03220 (forward presence in Finland) strengthens Article 5 eastern flank</td><td>Positive — demonstrates Swedish commitment</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Finland (host nation)</td><td>Direct beneficiary of HD03220 forward deployment</td><td>Positive — military cooperation deepened</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Russia</td><td>HD03220 interpreted as provocation — diplomatic countermeasures possible</td><td>Negative — potential protest note</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut potentially conflicts with EU Climate Law and Fit for 55</td><td>Watching — no formal proceedings yet</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine</td><td>HD03232 + HD03231 (tribunal and compensation commission accession)</td><td>Positive — legal accountability mechanism supported</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export recipients</td><td>HD03228 (modernised arms rules) — clearer export framework</td><td>Mixed — MP/V concerned about export controls</td><td>[A1] — HD024096, HD024091</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-institutions">Lens 5: Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-institutions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-institutions">Lens 5: Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-institutions"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-institutions">Lens 5: Institutions<a class="" aria-hidden="tru
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Institution</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksrevisionen</td><td>HD03241 (fiscal framework report) + HD03219 (dental care) in scope</td><td>Auditor role — findings may constrain government options</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish courts</td><td>HD03218, HD03235 will face proportionality reviews — risk R02 and R05</td><td>Judicial independence applies</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>New Environmental Permitting Authority</td><td>HD03238 — new agency to be established</td><td>Institutional start-up risk; staffing/mandate timeline unclear</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Police Authority</td><td>HD03237 (paid police training) + HD10439 (Stockholm shortfall)</td><td>Benefits from training reform; capacity gaps acknowledged</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Försäkringskassan</td><td>HD01SfU20 — simplified parental benefit process</td><td>Administrative efficiency gain; implementation 2026-07-01</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-civil-society">Lens 6: Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-civil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-civil-society">Lens 6: Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-civil-society"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-civil-society">Lens 6: Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Impact</th><th>Stance</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>LO (trade union confederation)</td><td>Interpellation HD10437 (pay transparency) relates to union interests</td><td>Supportive of pay transparency directive implementation</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Women's shelter organisations</td><td>HD10438 — multiple closures despite HD03245 strategy</td><td>Highly negative — underfunding threatens existence</td><td>[A2] — HD10438</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish Forests Association</td><td>HD03242 (forestry rules) — active regulatory revision</td><td>Industry supportive of clarity; environmental NGOs concerned</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Tech sector</td><td>HD03244 (interoperability) + HD01TU21 (e-legitimation)</td><td>Industry broadly supportive of digital government infrastructure</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental NGOs</td><td>HD03236 (fuel tax cut) direct contradiction of climate strategy</td><td>Strongly opposed — ally of MP/V framing</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     GOV["🏛️ Tidökoalitionen&#x3C;br/>(M+KD+L+SD)"]
     S["🔴 Socialdemokraterna&#x3C;br/>(Main opposition)"]
@@ -1279,11 +1279,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style MEDIA fill:#4A148C,color:#FFFFFF
     style RIKSREV fill:#37474F,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Gate requirement</strong>: ≥10 indicators with date patterns across 4 horizons</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-set">Indicator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-set"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-set">Indicator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-set"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-set">Indicator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Total</strong>: 13 indicators — gate requirement of ≥10 MET ✅</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-dashboard">Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-dashboard">Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
     dateFormat  YYYY-MM-DD
@@ -1433,16 +1433,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-dashboard">Indicator Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     Riksmöte recess                    :2026-06-01, 14d
     Pre-election manifesto             :2026-06-01, 30d</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: strategic-extensions-methodology.md — F3EAD Exploit→Analyze</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framing">Scenario Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framing">Scenario Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framing"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Central Question</strong>: What are the dominant alternative futures for Sweden's political landscape by May 31, 2026 (end of spring session)?</p>
 <p><strong>Scope</strong>: 38-day window (2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31)
 <strong>Horizon</strong>: Session-end (H2 immediate)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive">Scenario Set (3 Alternatives — Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive">Scenario Set (3 Alternatives — Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-set-3-alternatives--mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhausti
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Name</th><th>WEP Probability</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1</td><td><strong>Stable Close</strong> — Government completes spring session agenda intact</td><td>Likely (60–70%)</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S-2</td><td><strong>Legislative Fracture</strong> — One or more major bills defeated or delayed</td><td>Unlikely (20–30%)</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>S-3</td><td><strong>Crisis Pivot</strong> — External shock (economic/security) forces emergency response</td><td>Remote (5–15%)</td><td>[D4]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: probabilities sum to 100% within rounding tolerance</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60">Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Likely — 60%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60">Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Likely — 60%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: The Tidökoalitionen manages SD support and keeps C/L on key votes. The full Law &#x26; Order Package passes JuU; the Energy Transition Package passes NU+MJU. SD accepts HD03235 deportation rules as "adequate first step." C supports HD03235 after amendment to require systematic + repeated crime threshold (per motion HD024095). The vårproposition (HD03100) and supplementary budget (HD0399) pass FiU with government majority. PM Kristersson enters the summer break with three legislative packages delivered.</p>
 <p><strong>Key enabling conditions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-s-1-stable-close-likely--60">Scenario S-1: Stable Close (Lik
 <li>JuU approves HD03218 committee report (by May 15)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25">Scenario S-2: Legislative Fracture (Unlikely — 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25">Scenario S-2: Legislative Fracture (Unlikely — 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: C withdraws support for HD03235 over proportionality concerns (motion HD024095 rejected by coalition). V and MP join S in a surprise vote defeating HD03235. Alternatively, HD0399 fails because SD demands amendments on welfare cuts that M rejects. The government is forced into extended committee negotiations, delaying one or more packages past the May 31 session-end.</p>
 <p><strong>Key enabling conditions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-s-2-legislative-fracture-unlikely--25">Scenario S-2: Legisla
 <li>JuU chair requests extended consultation period (by May 5)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10">Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Remote — 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10">Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Remote — 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: External shock — Russia escalates Baltic Sea military activity following HD03220 deployment in Finland; energy price spike driven by Middle East escalation; or IMF revises Sweden growth outlook sharply negative after Q1 data — forces government to abandon normal spring session schedule. Emergency session called; fiscal framework revised; Riksdag recess cancelled.</p>
 <p><strong>Key enabling conditions</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1524,18 +1524,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-s-3-crisis-pivot-remote--10">Scenario S-3: Crisis Pivot (Rem
 <li>Riksdag talman issues session extension notice (any date)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-validation">Scenario Probability Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-validation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-validation">Scenario Probability Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-validation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Scenario Probability Distribution (% of futures)
     "S-1 Stable Close" : 65
     "S-2 Legislative Fracture" : 25
     "S-3 Crisis Pivot" : 10</pre>
 <p><strong>Confidence assessment</strong>: [C2] — Assessed from public parliamentary record; coalition defection risks inferred from motion/interpellation patterns. External shock probability based on geopolitical baseline, not confirmed intelligence.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 5-dimension × 5-level Likelihood × Impact register per political-risk-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1642,7 +1642,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Domain</th><th>L (1–5)</th><th>I (1–5)</th><th>Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01</td><td>Vårändringsbudget (HD0399) defeated by unified opposition (S+V+MP+C)</td><td>Fiscal/Political</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R02</td><td>Deportation rule (HD03235) challenged in EU Court — Swedish courts apply restrictive interpretation</td><td>Legal</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R03</td><td>Electricity prices remain above 1.50 SEK/kWh through May, amplifying energy reform urgency</td><td>Economic/Energy</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R04</td><td>SD demands additional concessions on immigration/crime ahead of budget vote, destabilising coalition</td><td>Political</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R05</td><td>Gang crime sentences (HD03218) challenged on proportionality grounds by courts</td><td>Legal</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R06</td><td>Environmental permitting authority (HD03238) experiences implementation delays — renewable energy pipeline blocked</td><td>Governance</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R07</td><td>Women's shelter closure crisis escalates — government forced to emergency funding before election</td><td>Social</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R08</td><td>NATO forward presence in Finland triggers Russian countermeasures or diplomatic incident</td><td>Security</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R09</td><td>Spring fiscal projections revised downward — GDP growth forecast cut, undermining Svantesson narrative</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Wind power revenue-sharing (HD03239) opposed by municipal governments as insufficient</td><td>Governance</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-55-risk-heat-map">5×5 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-55-risk-heat-map">5×5 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-55-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Likelihood × Impact (April–May 2026)
     x-axis Low Impact (1) --> High Impact (5)
@@ -1673,15 +1673,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-55-risk-heat-map">5×5 Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style R09 fill:#4CAF50,color:#FFFFFF
     style R10 fill:#757575,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes">Chain 1: Fiscal Dominoes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes">Chain 1: Fiscal Dominoes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-1-fiscal-dominoes"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>R09</strong> (GDP revision down) → <strong>R01</strong> (budget defeat risk rises) → Opposition exploits fiscal weakness → <strong>R04</strong> (SD demands more) → Coalition credibility crisis ahead of September election</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash">Chain 2: Law &#x26; Order Backlash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash">Chain 2: Law &#x26; Order Backlash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-2-law--order-backlash"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>R02</strong> (deportation court challenge) → EU compliance pressure → <strong>R05</strong> (sentencing proportionality) → Government retreats on headline policy → SD loses confidence in coalition effectiveness</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict">Chain 3: Energy–Climate Conflict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict">Chain 3: Energy–Climate Conflict<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-3-energyclimate-conflict"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>R03</strong> (high energy prices) → Government doubles down on fossil fuel relief → <strong>T3 from SWOT</strong> (climate credibility gap) → EU / international criticism → Election-year reputational damage</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-estimates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1713,17 +1713,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-estimates">Posterior Probability Estimates<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Prior Probability</th><th>Updating Event</th><th>Posterior</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R01 (budget defeat)</td><td>15%</td><td>If all three parties S, V, MP confirm joint opposition</td><td>45%</td></tr><tr><td>R08 (NATO security)</td><td>10%</td><td>If Russia conducts Baltic exercise during Finland deployment</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td>R02 (deportation legal)</td><td>30%</td><td>If UN Human Rights Committee issues advisory</td><td>60%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-notes">Confidence Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-notes">Confidence Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All risk assessments are based on public parliamentary documents. Likelihood scores reflect political dynamics observable from parliamentary record; they are not probabilistic models.<br>
 <strong>Admiralty Code</strong>: [B2] — Reliable source, confirmed by multiple independent documents.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Tidökoalitionen's legislative agenda, April 23 – May 31, 2026
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political SWOT per political-swot-framework.md + TOWS matrix</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Coherent legislative package in law &#x26; order — double penalties (HD03218), youth rules (HD03246), civil servant liability (HD03217), deportation (HD03235) form a unified electoral narrative</td><td>HD03218 submitted 2026-04-09; HD03246 submitted 2026-04-16; riksdagen.se primary sources</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Spring Fiscal Package already partially implemented — extra ändringsbudget (HD03236) passed via HD01FiU48 on 2026-04-21, delivering visible fuel tax relief before summer</td><td>HD01FiU48 committee report confirmed passed; 82 öre/litre petrol reduction, 319 SEK/m³ diesel</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Energy policy package (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238) positions Sweden as European electricity market leader — new laws consolidate grid architecture, create dedicated permitting authority</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03240; HD03239 introduces mandatory revenue-sharing for hosting municipalities</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>NATO integration (HD03220) enjoys broad cross-party support — even S voted for NATO accession in 2022; Finnish forward presence strengthens Nordic-Baltic deterrence</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03220; cross-party context from 2022 NATO vote</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Strong institutional capacity — Finance Committee (FiU) processed extra ändringsbudget within 8 days of submission; committee system functioning effectively</td><td>HD01FiU48 dated 2026-04-21 vs HD03236 dated 2026-04-13</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>Fiscal credibility risk — extra ändringsbudget deteriorates fiscal balance by 4.1 billion SEK in 2026 at a time when the government's own fiscal framework targets surplus</td><td>HD01FiU48 summary: statens inkomster minskar ~1.56 bn SEK, utgifter ökar ~2.4 bn SEK</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>Law &#x26; order package lacks S/V/MP/C consensus — HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP) all oppose key provisions of deportation rules, widening the legislative divide</td><td>HD024090, HD024095, HD024097 all filed 2026-04-16 against HD03235</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>Police shortage undermines law &#x26; order narrative — interpellation HD10439 (Mattias Vepsä, S) highlights persistent regional gaps despite achievement of 10,000 police recruitment target</td><td>HD10439 filed 2026-04-20: BRÅ evaluation noted gaps in Stockholm deployment</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Women's shelters closures contradict gender equality strategy — interpellation HD10438 documents closure of multiple shelters while HD03245 positions government as champion of women's safety</td><td>HD10438 (Sofia Amloh, S → Nina Larsson, L) filed 2026-04-17</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Economic recovery narrative — GDP growth recovering from -0.20% (2023) to 0.82% (2024) allows Finance Minister Svantesson to campaign on stability and recovery ahead of September election</td><td>World Bank Sweden GDP data 2023–2024</td><td>[B1]</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Energy crisis exploited for political advantage — high electricity prices in early 2026 justified extra ändringsbudget; if energy remains elevated through May, government can amplify relief narrative</td><td>HD01FiU48 summary cites conflict in Mellanöstern and harsh winter 2026 as justifications</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>Condominium register (HD01CU28) + identity requirements (HD01CU27) address housing market opacity — government can position these as anti-crime/anti-money-laundering measures</td><td>HD01CU28 passed 2026-04-17; HD01CU27 effective 2026-07-01</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Interoperability proposal (HD03244) builds digital government credentials — data-sharing modernisation positions Sweden at EU NIS2/data-act frontier</td><td>riksdagen.se/HD03244; EU regulatory alignment context</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Opposition unity risk — if S, V, MP, and C coordinate against the vårändringsbudget (HD0399), the government faces a dramatic budget defeat in the final session week before election campaign</td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP) all oppose fuel tax cut; C ambiguous</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>SD credibility risk — SD MPs' relationship with the Tidö agenda may be tested if gang crime measures are perceived as insufficient; SD could seek to outbid M/KD/L on punitiveness</td><td>HD03218 context; SD's crime narrative history</td><td>[C3]</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Environmental credibility gap — fuel tax cut (HD03236, passed) directly contradicts Sweden's own climate targets; risk of EU infringement proceedings or diplomatic embarrassment at COP32</td><td>HD01FiU48 passed; MP motion HD024098 and V motion HD024092 explicitly cite climate impacts</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>Healthcare investment gap — interpellation HD10432 (Robert Olesen, S → Health Minister Elisabet Lann, KD) exposes ageing hospital infrastructure with massive capital requirements</td><td>HD10432 filed 2026-04-15; many Swedish hospitals built in 1960s</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1901,14 +1901,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th><strong>Strengths (S1–S5)</strong></th><th><strong>Weaknesses (W1–W4)</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities (O1–O4)</strong></td><td><strong>SO Strategies</strong>: Use S2+O2 (fuel tax relief + energy narrative) to build pre-election credibility; use S3+O3 (energy reform + housing transparency) as digital governance platform</td><td><strong>WO Strategies</strong>: Address W4 (shelters) via O1 (recovery dividend) — fund women's shelters through fiscal surplus; address W3 (police gaps) via O1 — deploy incremental policing resources</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats (T1–T4)</strong></td><td><strong>ST Strategies</strong>: Use S4 (NATO bipartisan support) to counter T2 (SD outbidding); use S1 (coherent L&#x26;O narrative) to pre-empt T1 (opposition unity)</td><td><strong>WT Strategies</strong>: Address W1+T3 (fiscal-climate gap) — announce a phased return of fuel tax from October 2026 to restore climate credentials without losing summer voter support</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-interference">Cross-SWOT Interference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-interference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S2 (extra budget passed) <strong>amplifies</strong> T3 (climate credibility gap) — the fastest legislative win is simultaneously the most environmentally damaging symbol</li>
 <li>W4 (shelter closures) <strong>directly contradicts</strong> S1 (law &#x26; order coherence) — the government's own social safety net strategy undermines its gender equality narrative</li>
 <li>O1 (recovery narrative) <strong>partially mitigates</strong> W1 (fiscal risk) — if growth accelerates to 2%+, the 4.1 bn SEK deterioration appears manageable in debt/GDP terms</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-visualisation">SWOT Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-visualisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-visualisation">SWOT Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-visualisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT Analysis — Tidökoalitionen Spring 2026
     x-axis Internal --> External
@@ -1937,12 +1937,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-swot-visualisation">SWOT Visualisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style T1 fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF
     style T3 fill:#E65100,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political Threat Taxonomy per political-threat-framework.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-i-legislative-threats">Category I: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-i-legislative-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-i-legislative-threats">Category I: Legislative Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-i-legislative-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1977,7 +1977,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-i-legislative-threats">Category I: Legislative Threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>LT-01</td><td>Unified opposition vote defeats vårändringsbudget HD0399</td><td>S+V+MP</td><td>Formal parliamentary vote</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>LT-02</td><td>Constitutional amendment (HD01KU33 — digital seizure) requires second reading after 2026 election</td><td>KU process</td><td>Constitutional procedural constraint</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>LT-03</td><td>V/C/MP jointly amend or defeat HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>V+C+MP</td><td>Opposition motions HD024090, HD024095, HD024097</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-ii-institutional-threats">Category II: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-ii-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-ii-institutional-threats">Category II: Institutional Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-ii-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-ii-institutional-threats">Category II: Institutional Threats
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>IT-01</td><td>New environmental permitting authority (HD03238) faces delay — conflicts with existing Naturvårdsverket authority</td><td>Bureaucratic</td><td>Implementation gap</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>IT-02</td><td>Riksrevisionen (National Audit Office) broadens fiscal scrutiny scope — second report (HD03241) triggers parliamentary accountability hearings</td><td>Riksrevisionen</td><td>Audit findings</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-iii-electoral-threats">Category III: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iii-electoral-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-iii-electoral-threats">Category III: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iii-electoral-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-iii-electoral-threats">Category III: Electoral Threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ET-01</td><td>Social Democrats consolidate opposition narrative around government's "crisis management incompetence" — 6 interpellations filed in one week signal coordinated offensive</td><td>S</td><td>Interpellation campaign (HD10444, HD10443, HD10439, HD10438, HD10434, HD10433)</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>ET-02</td><td>SD outbids M/KD/L on crime/immigration hardness, eroding coalition right flank</td><td>SD</td><td>Media positioning</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>ET-03</td><td>MP and V campaign on climate rollback (HD03236 fuel tax cut) — younger urban voters shift</td><td>MP+V</td><td>Campaign framing</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats">Category IV: External/Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats">Category IV: External/Security Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-iv-externalsecurity-threats">Category IV: External/Security
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Vector</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>XT-01</td><td>Russian diplomatic reaction to NATO forward presence (HD03220)</td><td>Russia</td><td>Diplomatic protest / military signalling</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>XT-02</td><td>EU Commission examines Swedish fuel tax cut against Climate Law</td><td>EU Commission</td><td>Infringement proceedings risk</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>XT-03</td><td>Middle East conflict escalates — energy prices spike, further fiscal pressure on HD0399</td><td>External</td><td>Market forces</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign">Attack Tree — ET-01 (Opposition Coordinated Interpellation Campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign">Attack Tree — ET-01 (Opposition Coordinated Interpellation Campaign)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
     ROOT["🎯 Weaken Tidö Government Pre-Election"]
 
@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--et-01-opposition-coordinated-interpellation-campaign">At
     style B3 fill:#1976D2,color:#FFFFFF
     style C1 fill:#6A1B9A,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat">Kill Chain Analysis — LT-01 (Budget Defeat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat">Kill Chain Analysis — LT-01 (Budget Defeat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-analysis--lt-01-budget-defeat">Kill Chain Analysis — LT-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Phase</th><th>Description</th><th>Current State</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Opposition assess government vulnerability on fiscal policy</td><td>ACTIVE — S, V, MP filed motions</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Fuel tax cut framed as climate betrayal + fiscal irresponsibility</td><td>ACTIVE — MP motion HD024098</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>Joint parliamentary motion and whipping</td><td>POTENTIAL — C position unclear</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>Budget vote fails — government loses fiscal credibility</td><td>NOT YET</td></tr><tr><td>C&#x26;C</td><td>S leads narrative; V/MP flank on climate; C holds pivotal votes</td><td>POTENTIAL</td></tr><tr><td>Persistence</td><td>Electoral damage extends through summer campaign</td><td>PROJECTED IF SUCCESSFUL</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (Political Context)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2186,18 +2186,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping-political-context">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping (P
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [C2 — assessed from public documents; opposition intent inferred from parliamentary record]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L3 (full analysis)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:100 — Vårpropositionen 2026 (Spring Fiscal Policy Bill)
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen (Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson, M)
 <strong>Status</strong>: In committee (FiU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: The government's spring economic framework projects GDP recovery (0.82% growth 2025, expanding in 2026), sets ceiling for the supplementary budget, and establishes fiscal priorities for the remainder of the Riksmöte 2025/26 session.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>GDP growth revised upward from 2025/26 budget assumptions — World Bank data confirms +0.82% 2024</li>
 <li>Fiscal space identified for spring relief measures (HD03236 fuel tax, retroactive energy support)</li>
@@ -2205,7 +2205,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Revenue forecasts updated for 2026 given employment recovery</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-context">Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-context">Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-context">Political Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Partisan alignment</td><td>Fully coalition-sponsored</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition response</td><td>S filed interpellations HD10444, HD10443, HD10433 targeting Finance Minister</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD position</td><td>Broadly supportive; monitors fiscal relief for constituents</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>C position</td><td>Not opposing fiscal framework</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-score">DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-score">DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-score"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2271,20 +2271,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-score">DIW Score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Score</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Decision impact</td><td>9/10</td><td>Sets fiscal framework for entire spring session</td></tr><tr><td>Intelligence value</td><td>8/10</td><td>Informs all downstream budget analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Warning value</td><td>7/10</td><td>Revenue miss would trigger fiscal adjustment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Composite</strong></td><td><strong>8.0</strong></td><td>Top-tier significance</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-flags">Risk Flags<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-flags"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-flags">Risk Flags<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-flags"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>R-01: Revenue miss → fiscal adjustment (see risk-assessment.md)</li>
 <li>R-06: EU fiscal rules scrutiny</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — primary source, directly from Riksdagen API</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03217">HD03217<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03217"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03217-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03217 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Extended criminal liability for civil servants
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen | <strong>Committee</strong>: KU</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: Expands criminal liability for public officials for abuse of office. Strengthens public sector accountability. DIW Score: 4.8/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03218">HD03218<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03218"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03218-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03218 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:218 — Dubbla straff vid gängkriminalitet
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen (Justice Minister Strömmer)</p>
@@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03218">HD03218<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>Implementation risk</strong>: Courts must identify "gang context" — legal definition clarity required.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03220">HD03220<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03220"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03220-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03220 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:220 — Militär framskjuten närvaro i Finland
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen (Defence)</p>
@@ -2303,7 +2303,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03220">HD03220<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>NATO context</strong>: Consistent with Allied eastern flank commitments; smaller than Germany's Lithuania brigade but symbolically important for first-time NATO member Sweden.
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Russian diplomatic reaction (XT-01 in threat-analysis.md) possible.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03235">HD03235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03235"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03235 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:235 — Utvisning vid brottsliga gärningar
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03235">HD03235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>Legal risk</strong>: R-02 in risk-assessment.md — ECHR Article 8 challenge probable.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] + [C2] for legal risk assessment</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03236 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+ | <strong>Status</strong>: ENACTED via HD01FiU48 (2026-04-21)</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax reduction
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2325,20 +2325,20 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — enacted law; primary source confirmed.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03238">HD03238<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03238"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03238 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: New environmental permitting authority
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen | <strong>Committee</strong>: MJU</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: Creates new agency to streamline environmental permitting (currently Naturvårdsverket). Addresses permit backlogs blocking renewable energy projects. DIW Score: 5.6/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>Implementation risk</strong>: New agency start-up — HIGH institutional risk (see implementation-feasibility.md)</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03239">HD03239<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03239"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03239 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Wind power municipal revenue-sharing law
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen | <strong>Committee</strong>: NU</p>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: Introduces mandatory revenue sharing between wind power developers and host municipalities. Addresses "not in my backyard" opposition. DIW Score: 5.8/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03240 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2+</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:240 — Ny ellag (New Electricity Act)
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>Legislative risk</strong>: MEDIUM — NU committee; majority present; no formal C/V/MP joint opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03246"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03246 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:246 — Ungdomsbrottslighet (Youth criminal sentencing)
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 6.2/10 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]
 <strong>Opposition</strong>: S+V+MP oppose on rehabilitation grounds. C silent.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd0399">HD0399<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd0399"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD0399 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L3</p>
 <p><strong>Title</strong>: Proposition 2025/26:99 — Vårändringsbudget 2026
 <strong>Filed by</strong>: Regeringen</p>
@@ -2371,56 +2371,56 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd0399">HD0399<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
 <p><strong>Political risk</strong>: LOW — government majority holds; SD+M+KD+L = 176 seats. Opposition cannot defeat.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-cluster-remaining">cluster-remaining<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-remaining"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23 | <strong>Tier</strong>: L2 cluster</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules">HD03228 — Modernised Arms Export Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules">HD03228 — Modernised Arms Export Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03228--modernised-arms-export-rules"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: UU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 5.0 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]
 Opposition motions: HD024091 (V — stricter controls), HD024096 (MP — human rights conditionality)
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Updates Swedish arms export framework; modernises KIMAB oversight.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine">HD03232 — International Tribunal for Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine">HD03232 — International Tribunal for Ukraine<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03232--international-tribunal-for-ukraine"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: UU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 5.2 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Sweden accedes to international tribunal mechanism for Ukraine war crimes accountability.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission">HD03231 — Ukraine Compensation Commission<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission">HD03231 — Ukraine Compensation Commission<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231--ukraine-compensation-commission"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: UU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 4.5 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Sweden joins compensation mechanism for Ukrainian civilian losses.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy">HD03245 — Women's Rights Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy">HD03245 — Women's Rights Strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03245--womens-rights-strategy"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: AU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 4.2 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>Tension</strong>: HD10438 interpellation notes women's shelters closing simultaneously — implementation gap.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules">HD03242 — Forestry Environmental Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules">HD03242 — Forestry Environmental Rules<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03242--forestry-environmental-rules"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: MJU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.8 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Revises forest environmental requirements; industry/NGO tension.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03237--paid-police-training">HD03237 — Paid Police Training<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03237--paid-police-training"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03237--paid-police-training">HD03237 — Paid Police Training<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03237--paid-police-training"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: JuU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.5 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Officers receive pay during training; addresses recruitment/retention gap.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03244--government-interoperability">HD03244 — Government Interoperability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03244--government-interoperability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03244--government-interoperability">HD03244 — Government Interoperability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03244--government-interoperability"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: TU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.2 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Mandates interoperability between government IT systems.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility">HD03233 — Medical Technology Accessibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility">HD03233 — Medical Technology Accessibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03233--medical-technology-accessibility"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: SoU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.5 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Improves patient access to medical technologies; disability rights impact.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure">HD03243 — Tax Adjustment Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure">HD03243 — Tax Adjustment Measure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03243--tax-adjustment-measure"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: SkU | <strong>DIW</strong>: 3.0 | <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]
 <strong>BLUF</strong>: Technical tax adjustment; low political salience.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: electoral-domain-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-election-context">Election Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-context">Election Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-context"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: 2026-09-13 (Sunday)
 <strong>Days remaining</strong>: ~143 days from 2026-04-23
 <strong>Key session milestone</strong>: Riksmöte 2025/26 ends ~June 2026</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result">Current Parliamentary Composition (Approximate — 2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result">Current Parliamentary Composition (Approximate — 2022 Election Result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2493,7 +2493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-parliamentary-composition-approximate--2022-election-result">
 <p><strong>Opposition</strong> (S+V+C+MP): 107+24+24+18 = <strong>173 seats</strong></p>
 <p><em>Note: Approximate 2022 election results used; actual current composition may vary by 1–3 seats due to departures/by-elections. See Methodology Improvement 3.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications">Spring 2026 Package Electoral Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications">Spring 2026 Package Electoral Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2526,8 +2526,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-spring-2026-package-electoral-implications">Spring 2026 Package Elect
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Package</th><th>Electoral target group</th><th>Expected impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax cut (HD03236)</td><td>Rural/suburban commuters</td><td>Short-term relief narrative — returns credit to M/SD</td></tr><tr><td>Law &#x26; Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03235)</td><td>Crime-concerned suburban voters</td><td>Core SD+M voter consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Energy Transition (HD03240)</td><td>Energy-sector workers; liberal voters</td><td>Positions government as "investment-ready"</td></tr><tr><td>Women's rights strategy (HD03245)</td><td>Suburban women voters</td><td>Attempts to counter S framing on gender equality</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026">Coalition Viability Scenarios (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats">Scenario A: Tidökoalitionen continues (requires ~175+ seats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026">Coalition Viability Scenarios (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-scenarios-september-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats">Scenario A: Tidökoalitionen continues (requires ~175+ seats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Current estimated seats: 176 (bare majority)</li>
 <li>If M gains 3–5 seats from delivering on fiscal promises: +3 seats</li>
@@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-a-tidökoalitionen-continues-requires-175-seats">Scenario A:
 <li>If L holds (currently fragile at 16 seats — 4% threshold): critical</li>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: L polling near 4% threshold — loss of L would drop bloc to 160 seats</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority">Scenario B: S-led bloc majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority">Scenario B: S-led bloc majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Current: 173 seats</li>
 <li>If MP survives 4% threshold: stays at 18 seats</li>
@@ -2543,14 +2543,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-b-s-led-bloc-majority">Scenario B: S-led bloc majority<a cla
 <li>If C swings back toward centre-left: potentially +10–15 seats</li>
 <li><strong>Key swing factor</strong>: C — if C moves toward S collaboration, S-led bloc reaches 175+</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition">Scenario C: Cross-bloc grand coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition">Scenario C: Cross-bloc grand coalition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-cross-bloc-grand-coalition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Only if A and B both fail to reach 175</li>
 <li>Historical precedent: Sweden has managed minority configurations but not grand coalitions in modern era</li>
 <li>Probability: Remote [D4]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-assessment">Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-risk-assessment">Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-risk-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Party Electoral Risk (0=Safe, 10=High risk of seat loss)"
     x-axis ["S", "SD", "M", "V", "C", "KD", "MP", "L"]
@@ -2558,9 +2558,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-risk-assessment">Electoral Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-
     bar [3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 5, 7, 8]</pre>
 <p><strong>Highest risk parties</strong>: L (threshold risk), MP (threshold risk), C (swing potential)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2620,7 +2620,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution">Current Riksdag Seat Distribution<
 <p><strong>Majority threshold</strong>: 175 seats
 <strong>Government bloc</strong> (M+KD+L+SD): 176 — bare majority (+1)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills">Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills">Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2679,7 +2679,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table-selected-bills">Pivotal Vote Table (Selected Bills
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th>Ja needed</th><th>Gov (M+KD+L+SD)</th><th>S</th><th>V</th><th>C</th><th>MP</th><th>Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03218 (gang sentences)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235 (deportation)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅ (if SD+C)</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>PASS if C neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399 (supplementary budget)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>PASS</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (electricity law)</td><td>175</td><td>176 ✅</td><td>TBD</td><td>Nej</td><td>TBD</td><td>Nej</td><td>LIKELY PASS</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: If C votes Nej on HD03235: Government = M+KD+L+SD = 176; C opposition adds to S+V+MP = 173+24 = 197 Nej. Government still has 176 vs 173 opposition bloc — <strong>passes if SD holds</strong>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative">Sainte-Laguë Projection (September 2026 — Illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative">Sainte-Laguë Projection (September 2026 — Illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative"></a></h3>
 <p>Assuming 5% threshold applies. Illustrative scenarios only (no polling data — [D4]):</p>
 
 
@@ -2734,9 +2734,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-september-2026--illustrative">Sainte-Laguë
 <p><strong>Key threshold risk</strong>: L at 16 seats (4.6% 2022 share) — if polls below 4% threshold, government loses L's 16 seats, dropping bloc to 160 (minority).</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [D4] — No polling data; pure structural projection.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2807,7 +2807,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-matrix">Segment Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Description</th><th>Key policy concern</th><th>Package impact</th><th>Likely shift</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Rural commuters</td><td>Households >50 km from city, car-dependent</td><td>Fuel costs, housing</td><td>✅ HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>Stable/slight M+SD gain</td></tr><tr><td>Urban professionals</td><td>Income >median, Stockholm/Gothenburg</td><td>Housing, climate</td><td>⚠️ Energy transition ambiguity</td><td>Possible M→C/S shift</td></tr><tr><td>Working class</td><td>Industrial/service workers, lower income</td><td>Job security, crime</td><td>✅ Law &#x26; order package</td><td>SD consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Younger urban</td><td>18–35, urban, climate-concerned</td><td>Climate, housing</td><td>❌ Fuel tax cut seen as rollback</td><td>MP+V→S flow possible</td></tr><tr><td>Senior citizens</td><td>65+, pension-dependent</td><td>Healthcare, care</td><td>✅ Medical technology access (HD03233)</td><td>Stable, slight KD benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Small business owners</td><td>SME, employer contributions</td><td>Tax burden</td><td>✅ Interpellation HD10444/HD10443 signals attention</td><td>Uncertain; S monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>Women (30–55)</td><td>Working mothers, suburban</td><td>Shelter access, pay equity</td><td>⚠️ Shelters closing despite strategy (HD10438)</td><td>Risk of S+C appeal</td></tr><tr><td>Rural/periphery</td><td>Northern Sweden, forestry/mining</td><td>Energy costs, regional development</td><td>✅ Energy package broadly positive</td><td>M+C stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-volatility-map">Electoral Volatility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-volatility-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-volatility-map">Electoral Volatility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-volatility-map"></a></h3>
 <p>High-volatility segments (most likely to switch):</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Young urban</strong> — 15% shift potential toward left-green bloc if climate framing dominates</li>
@@ -2816,21 +2816,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-volatility-map">Electoral Volatility Map<a class="" aria-hi
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Segment analysis derived from policy content + demographic inference; no direct polling data available (Gap G-2 in intelligence-assessment.md)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: strategic-extensions-methodology.md — comparative analysis</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-selection">Comparator Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-selection"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-selection">Comparator Selection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-selection"></a></h3>
 <p>Two comparator jurisdictions selected per methodology requirements:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Norway (NO)</strong> — Nordic peer; similar energy economy, minority government history</li>
 <li><strong>Germany (DE)</strong> — Major EU member; recent coalition collapse and fiscal stress analogies</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-1-norway">Comparator 1: Norway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-norway"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-1-norway">Comparator 1: Norway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-norway"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-context">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context"></a></h4>
 <p>Norway's Ap-Sp minority government under PM Jonas Gahr Støre faced energy price shock politics in 2022–24. The government implemented temporary electricity price subsidies (strømstøtte) directly analogous to Sweden's retroactive energy price support in HD01FiU48 and HD0399.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236">Key parallels with Swedish HD0399/HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236">Key parallels with Swedish HD0399/HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2875,10 +2875,10 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-hd0399hd03236">Key parallels with Swedish
 <p><strong>Key lesson</strong>: Norway's subsidy created dependency expectations — voters were disappointed when support was withdrawn. Sweden's time-limited fuel tax cut (ends after September 2026) faces similar political commitment trap.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — Analogy based on structural similarity; Norway context from World Bank/OECD public reports.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-2-germany">Comparator 2: Germany<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-context-1">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-2-germany">Comparator 2: Germany<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-context-1">Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-context-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's Ampelkoalition (SPD+Greens+FDP) collapsed in November 2024 over a budget dispute. FDP withdrew from coalition when SPD proposed debt brake suspension. Germany held snap elections February 2025, producing CDU/CSU-led coalition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics">Key parallels with Swedish SD support dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics">Key parallels with Swedish SD support dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2918,8 +2918,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-key-parallels-with-swedish-sd-support-dynamics">Key parallels with Sw
 <p><strong>Key lesson</strong>: In the German case, the formal coalition structure made collapse structurally easier. Sweden's minority model (SD as confidence-and-supply) provides SD with exit without full accountability. This reduces (but does not eliminate) collapse risk — SD benefits from legislative outcomes without governing responsibility.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — Germany analogy well-documented in public sources (Bundestag records, ECFR analysis); applied to Swedish context as structural comparison.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-eu-policy-context">EU Policy Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-policy-context"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236">EU Climate Law vs HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-policy-context">EU Policy Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-policy-context"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236">EU Climate Law vs HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's fuel tax cut (82 öre/litre petrol) runs against EU Fit for 55 trajectory. EU Climate Law 2021/1119 requires progressive decarbonisation. While the measure does not formally violate current directives (Sweden retains national competence on fuel taxes until ETS2 2027), it sends a negative signal ahead of:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>ETS2 carbon pricing implementation (2027)</li>
@@ -2927,7 +2927,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-eu-climate-law-vs-hd03236">EU Climate Law vs HD03236<a class="" aria-
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Risk R-07</strong> in risk-assessment.md quantifies this at LOW probability of formal infringement proceedings, but political cost in EU Council may be non-trivial.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison">NATO Eastern Flank Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison">NATO Eastern Flank Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2962,9 +2962,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-nato-eastern-flank-comparison">NATO Eastern Flank Comparison<a class=
 <p>Sweden's contribution is consistent with Allied commitments but smaller in scale than Germany's Lithuania brigade. Domestic debate about deployment size and legal basis (permanent vs rotational) tracked via HD03220 committee review.</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session">Parallel 1: 2010 Alliansen Pre-Election Spring Session<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session">Parallel 1: 2010 Alliansen Pre-Election Spring Session<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: Spring 2010 — 5 months before September 2010 election
 <strong>Government</strong>: Alliansen (M+C+L+KD) under PM Fredrik Reinfeldt
 <strong>Structural similarity</strong>: Right-centre minority coalition; major fiscal package; SD entering parliament for first time in September 2010</p>
@@ -2978,7 +2978,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-1-2010-alliansen-pre-election-spring-session">Parallel 1: 20
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: 7/10 — same pre-election spring delivery model; different substantive policy content (tax cuts vs fuel relief); SD now in support role rather than new entrant</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2] — well-documented Swedish electoral history</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021">Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Crisis 2021<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021">Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Crisis 2021<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: June 2021
 <strong>Government</strong>: S-MP minority under PM Stefan Löfven
 <strong>Event</strong>: No-confidence vote (misstroendevotum) carried in Riksdag when V withdrew support over HD clause reform</p>
@@ -2992,17 +2992,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-2-löfven-budget-crisis-2021">Parallel 2: Löfven Budget Cri
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: 5/10 — parallel on confidence-supply risk; lower probability in 2026 given larger coalition base</p>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1] — direct Swedish parliamentary record</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-applied">Lessons Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-applied">Lessons Applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applied"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Pre-election "delivery" narratives can secure re-election (Alliansen 2010 precedent suggests yes — won September 2010)</li>
 <li>Single party defection in minority parliament was survivable in 2021; 2026 coalition has more buffer</li>
 <li>Fuel tax cuts as pre-election "gift" have Norwegian precedent of temporary relief → future reversal = political cost</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package">Feasibility Assessment by Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236">Package A: Spring Fiscal (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package">Feasibility Assessment by Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-by-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236">Package A: Spring Fiscal (HD03100, HD0399, HD03236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3041,7 +3041,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-package-a-spring-fiscal-hd03100-hd0399-hd03236">Package A: Spring Fis
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Risk</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative feasibility</td><td>HD03236 enacted; HD0399 pending FiU</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative capacity</td><td>Försäkringskassan must process retroactive energy reimbursements by summer</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal sustainability</td><td>4.1 bn SEK cost; fits within spring fiscal framework</td><td>LOW</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline to impact</td><td>Fuel tax cut immediate (April); retroactive energy support Q2</td><td>LOW</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall package feasibility</strong>: HIGH (HD03236 already enacted)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237">Package B: Law &#x26; Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235, HD03237)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237">Package B: Law &#x26; Order (HD03218, HD03246, HD03217, HD03235, HD03237)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3080,7 +3080,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-package-b-law--order-hd03218-hd03246-hd03217-hd03235-hd03237">Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Risk</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative feasibility</td><td>All in committee; majority present for passage</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Judicial implementation</td><td>Courts must apply new sentence rules; training required</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Constitutional test</td><td>HD03235 deportation may face ECHR proportionality review</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[C2]</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline to impact</td><td>Laws enacted by July 2026 earliest; effects 12–18 months</td><td>LOW</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall package feasibility</strong>: MEDIUM (legislative passage likely; implementation slower)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242">Package C: Energy Transition (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238, HD03242)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242">Package C: Energy Transition (HD03240, HD03239, HD03238, HD03242)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-package-c-energy-transition-hd03240-hd03239-hd03238-hd03242">Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Risk</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative feasibility</td><td>NU + MJU committee review; majority present</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>New agency (HD03238)</td><td>Environmental permitting authority requires staffing, mandate clarity</td><td>HIGH (institutional)</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Electricity market reform (HD03240)</td><td>Grid expansion needed; Vattenfall/Energimarknadsinspektionen coordination</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind revenue sharing (HD03239)</td><td>Municipal revenue model needs regulation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall package feasibility</strong>: MEDIUM (legislative OK; implementation challenging, esp. new agency)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-implementation-risks-summary">Key Implementation Risks Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implementation-risks-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-implementation-risks-summary">Key Implementation Risks Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-implementation-risks-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3153,15 +3153,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-implementation-risks-summary">Key Implementation Risks Summary<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Package</th><th>Severity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ECHR/constitutional challenge to HD03235</td><td>Law &#x26; Order</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>New environmental permitting agency delayed</td><td>Energy Transition</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Försäkringskassan retroactive payment backlog</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>L threshold failure removes coalition partner</td><td>Cross-package</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B2-C2] depending on dimension</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) per strategic-extensions-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-purpose">Purpose<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-purpose"></a></h3>
 <p>This document stress-tests the dominant assessment (Scenario S-1: Stable Close) by systematically examining three competing hypotheses. Each hypothesis is evaluated against available evidence.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-matrix">Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1">H-1: SD withdrawal is imminent (contradicts S-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-matrix">Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1">H-1: SD withdrawal is imminent (contradicts S-1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis</strong>: SD will withdraw support before May 31, triggering a government confidence crisis.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3179,7 +3179,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h-1-sd-withdrawal-is-imminent-contradicts-s-1">H-1: SD withdrawal is
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: H-1 inconsistent with weight of evidence. [D4] confidence in H-1 being true.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government">H-2: Centre's (C) selective opposition is strategic — they will ultimately vote with government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government">H-2: Centre's (C) selective opposition is strategic — they will ultimately vote with government<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately-vote-with-government"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis</strong>: C's formal opposing motions (HD024095 on HD03235) are positional theatre — they will ultimately support the government to preserve governing influence.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3196,7 +3196,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h-2-centres-c-selective-opposition-is-strategic--they-will-ultimately
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: H-2 partially consistent with evidence. [B2] confidence — C probably votes with government after token amendment, but not certain.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded">H-3: The fuel tax cut (HD03236) is already enacted — its political consequences are front-loaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded">H-3: The fuel tax cut (HD03236) is already enacted — its political consequences are front-loaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-consequences-are-front-loaded"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Hypothesis</strong>: Because HD01FiU48 enacted the fuel tax cut on 2026-04-21, the political salience of this issue is already priced in. There will be no further material opposition effect in the remaining 38-day window.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3212,7 +3212,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h-3-the-fuel-tax-cut-hd03236-is-already-enacted--its-political-conseq
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH Assessment</strong>: H-3 largely consistent — the immediate legislative risk is closed. Residual political risk persists at LOW level through election campaign. [A2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-consistency-matrix">ACH Consistency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-consistency-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-consistency-matrix">ACH Consistency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-consistency-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3262,18 +3262,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-consistency-matrix">ACH Consistency Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence Item</th><th>H-1 (SD withdraws)</th><th>H-2 (C theatrics)</th><th>H-3 (Front-loaded)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SD stable support 2022–25</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218 delivered for SD</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>C filed HD024095 formally</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48 enacted 21 April</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition motions after enactment</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Interpellation wave (S × 6)</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Inconsistent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-conclusions">Conclusions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conclusions">Conclusions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusions"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S-1 (Stable Close) remains the dominant scenario</strong> — all three devil's advocate hypotheses either fail to dislodge it (H-1) or are partially compatible with it (H-2, H-3).</li>
 <li><strong>Highest residual risk</strong>: C tactical voting (H-2) — if C defects fully on HD03235, the deportation bill may fail. Probability: 10–15%.</li>
 <li><strong>Lowest risk domain</strong>: Fuel tax cut (H-3) — already enacted; legislative risk is closed.</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 7-dimension political classification per political-classification-guide.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-dimensions">Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-dimensions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-dimensions">Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-dimensions"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Issue Area</strong> (policy domain)</li>
 <li><strong>Ideological Positioning</strong> (left-right, libertarian-authoritarian)</li>
@@ -3284,7 +3284,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-dimensions">Classification Dimensions<a class="" aria-
 <li><strong>Public Salience</strong> (elite / media / mass public)</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3523,7 +3523,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-Document Classification<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Issue Area</th><th>Ideological Positioning</th><th>Legislative Stage</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Partisan Alignment</th><th>Constitutional</th><th>Public Salience</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Macro-fiscal</td><td>Right-Centre (growth + fiscal responsibility)</td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>CRITICAL — spring fiscal deadline</td><td>Coalition-sponsored</td><td>Framework (budget)</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Macro-fiscal supplementary</td><td>Right-Centre</td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>CRITICAL — immediate relief</td><td>Coalition-sponsored</td><td>Framework (budget)</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Energy/fiscal</td><td>Right/libertarian (tax cut)</td><td>ENACTED 2026-04-21 (HD01FiU48)</td><td>ENACTED</td><td>Coalition + SD</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Energy law</td><td>Centre-right (market reform)</td><td>Committee (NU)</td><td>HIGH — 2030 energy target</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Mass public</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Energy/local government</td><td>Centre (revenue sharing)</td><td>Committee (NU)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition + possible C</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Environmental/institutional</td><td>Centre-right (permitting reform)</td><td>Committee (MJU)</td><td>HIGH — permits backlog</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Justice/criminal</td><td>Right/authoritarian (harsher sentences)</td><td>Committee (JuU)</td><td>HIGH — election priority</td><td>Coalition + SD</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>High (crime)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Justice/youth</td><td>Right/authoritarian</td><td>Committee (JuU)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition + SD</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Justice/public service</td><td>Right/authoritarian (accountability)</td><td>Committee (KU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Migration</td><td>Far-right adjacent (mass deportation)</td><td>Committee (SfU)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition + SD, C opposition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>High (immigration)</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>Defence/NATO</td><td>Centre-right (international obligations)</td><td>Committee (FöU)</td><td>HIGH — NATO Article 5</td><td>Coalition + possible S</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Defence/exports</td><td>Centre-right (rule-based)</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition; MP/V opposition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Foreign/Ukraine tribunal</td><td>Cross-partisan (human rights)</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Potentially bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Foreign/Ukraine compensation</td><td>Cross-partisan</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Potentially bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Gender equality / welfare</td><td>Centre</td><td>Committee (AU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition; concerns re implementation</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Forestry/environment</td><td>Centre-right (industry balance)</td><td>Committee (MJU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition; environmental NGO opposition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low-Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Justice/policing</td><td>Centre (institutional)</td><td>Committee (JuU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Digital/government</td><td>Centre (modernisation)</td><td>Committee (TU)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Social welfare</td><td>Centre-left (accessibility)</td><td>Committee (SoU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition + possible bipartisan</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Moderate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03243</td><td>Taxation</td><td>Centre-right</td><td>Committee (SkU)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Coalition</td><td>Ordinary</td><td>Low</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-issue-area-clustering">Issue Area Clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-area-clustering"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-issue-area-clustering">Issue Area Clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-area-clustering"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Issue Area Distribution (20 documents)
     "Fiscal/Budget" : 3
     "Justice/Crime" : 4
@@ -3534,7 +3534,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-issue-area-clustering">Issue Area Clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "Digital/Admin" : 1
     "Environment/Forestry" : 2</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ideological-spectrum-map">Ideological Spectrum Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-spectrum-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ideological-spectrum-map">Ideological Spectrum Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-spectrum-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
     title "Ideological Positioning (Right-Centre vs Authoritarian)"
     x-axis ["Libertarian", "Centre-Libertarian", "Centre", "Centre-Authoritarian", "Authoritarian"]
@@ -3543,7 +3543,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ideological-spectrum-map">Ideological Spectrum Map<a class="" aria-hi
     line [2, 3, 6, 7, 8]</pre>
 <p><strong>Key pattern</strong>: The 2025/26 spring package is distinctively right-of-centre on economic policy AND authoritarian-leaning on justice/migration — consistent with Tidöavtalet's SD-influenced agenda.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary">Constitutional Sensitivity Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary">Constitutional Sensitivity Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3571,12 +3571,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-constitutional-sensitivity-summary">Constitutional Sensitivity Summar
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th>Count</th><th>Examples</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constitutional (ch. 8 RF)</td><td>1</td><td>HD01KU33 (digital seizure — requires second reading post-election)</td></tr><tr><td>Framework law (budget)</td><td>2</td><td>HD03100, HD0399</td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary law</td><td>17</td><td>All others</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: structural-metadata-methodology.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package">Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package">Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3610,7 +3610,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-a--spring-fiscal-package">Cluster A — Spring Fiscal Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>Primary budget framework</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Supplementary budget (vårändringsbudget)</td><td>Implements HD03100</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fuel tax</td><td>Enacted via HD01FiU48 2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Finance Committee report — passed</td><td>Enacted outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Legislative chain</strong>: HD03100 → HD0399 → HD03236 → HD01FiU48 (enacted)</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--law--order-package">Cluster B — Law &#x26; Order Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--law--order-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--law--order-package">Cluster B — Law &#x26; Order Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--law--order-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3649,7 +3649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-b--law--order-package">Cluster B — Law &#x26; Order Package
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Double gang crime sentences</td><td>Core measure</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Youth offenders — stricter penalties</td><td>Supplementary</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Civil servant criminal liability</td><td>Institutional accountability</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Deportation for criminal convictions</td><td>Migration × justice nexus</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Paid police training</td><td>Enforcement capacity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Opposition motions against cluster</strong>: HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP) vs HD03235</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package">Cluster C — Energy Transition Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package">Cluster C — Energy Transition Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3683,7 +3683,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-c--energy-transition-package">Cluster C — Energy Transition
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>New electricity law</td><td>Market framework</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Wind power municipal revenue sharing</td><td>Local government incentive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Environmental permitting authority (new agency)</td><td>Permit reform</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Forestry environmental rules</td><td>Adjacent environmental reform</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Tension</strong>: HD03236 (fossil fuel tax cut) ↔ HD03240/HD03239 (renewable transition) — internal policy tension within coalition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs">Cluster D — Defence &#x26; Foreign Affairs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs">Cluster D — Defence &#x26; Foreign Affairs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3716,7 +3716,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-d--defence--foreign-affairs">Cluster D — Defence &#x26; For
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>Sweden military forward presence in Finland</td><td>NATO Article 5</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernised arms export rules</td><td>Defence exports</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>International tribunal for Ukraine</td><td>Legal accountability</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Compensation commission for Ukraine</td><td>Reparations mechanism</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-e--social--welfare">Cluster E — Social &#x26; Welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--social--welfare"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-e--social--welfare">Cluster E — Social &#x26; Welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-e--social--welfare"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3744,7 +3744,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-e--social--welfare">Cluster E — Social &#x26; Welfare<a cla
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title summary</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Women's rights strategy</td><td>Gender equality framework</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Medical technology accessibility</td><td>Healthcare equity</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU20</td><td>Simplified parental benefit</td><td>Social insurance reform</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-diagram">Legislative Chain Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chain-diagram">Legislative Chain Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
     HD03100["📋 HD03100\nVårproposition"] -->|informs| HD0399["📋 HD0399\nVårändringsbudget"]
     HD0399 -->|includes| HD03236["📋 HD03236\nFuel Tax Cut"]
@@ -3765,7 +3765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-diagram">Legislative Chain Diagram<a class="" aria-
     style HD03235 fill:#C62828,color:#FFFFFF
     style HD03240 fill:#F57F17,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders">Cross-Reference to Sibling Analysis Folders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders">Cross-Reference to Sibling Analysis Folders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier-C Aggregation Note</strong>: This is the first run of 2026-04-23. No prior-cycle sibling analysis folders exist under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/</code> at time of writing. When parallel workflows run (propositions, committee-reports, interpellations, evening-analysis), this cross-reference map should be updated to link:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> — single-type proposition analysis</li>
@@ -3781,7 +3781,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-to-sibling-analysis-folders">Cross-Reference to Sibli
 <li>PIR-7 (Election 2026): Active — all packages interpreted through election lens</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-interpellation--minister-mapping">Interpellation → Minister Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation--minister-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-interpellation--minister-mapping">Interpellation → Minister Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interpellation--minister-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3861,7 +3861,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-interpellation--minister-mapping">Interpellation → Minister Mapping
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Interpellation</th><th>Filed by</th><th>Target Minister</th><th>Policy Cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — employer contributions</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — SME</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — family debt</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>S</td><td>Justice (Strömmer)</td><td>Justice — cybercrime</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>S</td><td>Justice (Strömmer)</td><td>Justice — police gaps</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>S</td><td>Equality</td><td>Social — women's shelters</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>S</td><td>Labour</td><td>Social — pay transparency</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>S</td><td>Infrastructure (Carlson)</td><td>Housing — construction shortfall</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>S</td><td>Finance (Svantesson)</td><td>Fiscal — SME</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>S</td><td>Energy</td><td>Energy — district heating</td></tr><tr><td>HD10428</td><td>M</td><td>Infrastructure</td><td>Transport — emergency airport</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping">Opposing Motions → Proposition Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping">Opposing Motions → Proposition Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3929,9 +3929,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-opposing-motions--proposition-mapping">Opposing Motions → Propositi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion</th><th>Filed by</th><th>Against</th><th>Policy Cluster</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td></tr><tr><td>HD024087</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03229</td><td>Environment</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>V</td><td>HD03235 deportation</td><td>Migration/Justice</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>V</td><td>HD03228 arms</td><td>Defence</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>V</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax</td><td>Fiscal/Climate</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>C</td><td>HD03235 deportation</td><td>Migration</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03228 arms</td><td>Defence</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03235 deportation</td><td>Migration</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax</td><td>Climate</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>ICD 203 establishes 9 analytic standards. Below is the audit for this analysis:</p>
 
 
@@ -4001,7 +4001,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Standard</th><th>Requirement</th><th>Self-Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1 Objectivity</td><td>Sources treated impartially; analyst bias minimised</td><td>PASS</td><td>All parties treated in stakeholder matrix; coalition and opposition positions documented equally</td></tr><tr><td>S-2 Independence</td><td>Analysis not shaped by desired outcome</td><td>PASS</td><td>Devils-advocate confirms S-1 against 3 hypotheses; alternate scenarios assigned explicit probabilities</td></tr><tr><td>S-3 Timeliness</td><td>Analysis delivered in time to inform decisions</td><td>PASS</td><td>Delivered 2026-04-23 — covers 38-day window through session end</td></tr><tr><td>S-4 Based on all available information</td><td>All open-source data considered</td><td>PARTIAL — Calendar API returned HTML; committee hearing dates not confirmed. Gap documented in intelligence-assessment.md</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-5 Properly distinguished from advocacy</td><td>Analysis separated from policy preference</td><td>PASS</td><td>Neutral framing; opposition and government positions reported equally</td></tr><tr><td>S-6 Communicates uncertainty</td><td>WEP + Admiralty codes on all key judgments</td><td>PASS — All 5 KJs have explicit WEP + Admiralty + Kent %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-7 Employs alternative analysis</td><td>≥3 ACH hypotheses; scenario alternatives</td><td>PASS — 3 devils-advocate hypotheses; 3 scenarios</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-8 Tradecraft transparency</td><td>Methodology documented</td><td>PASS — This document</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>S-9 Self-critique</td><td>Limitations acknowledged</td><td>PASS — See §Limitations below</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Overall rating</strong>: 8/9 — S-4 partial due to calendar API failure.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Required)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Required)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4093,21 +4093,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10-required">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10 Req
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Technique</th><th>Applied In</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td><td>Explicit assumption: SD support stable</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td><td>3 hypotheses with consistency matrix</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>5S+4W+4O+4T with TOWS matrix</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Red Team Analysis</td><td>devils-advocate.md H-1 (SD withdrawal test)</td><td>Stress-tests dominant view</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>3 scenarios, probabilities sum to 100%</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Influence diagrams / network mapping</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>Mermaid influence graph</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Risk Matrix</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td><td>10-item 5×5 heat map</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Attack Tree</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>ET-01 interpellation campaign tree</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Kill Chain</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>LT-01 budget defeat chain</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Historical Analogy</td><td>comparative-international.md</td><td>Norway strømstøtte; German Ampel coalition</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>DIW Weighting</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td><td>15 documents ranked 1.0–8.6</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Admiralty Coding</td><td>All artifact headers</td><td>[A-F][1-6] on every evidence item</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>WEP / Kent Scale</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td><td>7-band WEP on all KJs</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-identified">Methodology Improvements Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-identified"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time committee schedule integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-identified">Methodology Improvements Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-identified"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration">Improvement 1: Real-time committee schedule integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-real-time-committee-schedule-integration"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Problem</strong>: The analysis cannot identify precise chamber vote dates because the Riksdag calendar API returned HTML rather than JSON. This creates a timing gap — we know bills are in committee but not when they come to a floor vote.<br>
 <strong>Recommendation</strong>: Implement a retry/fallback parser for the calendar endpoint that handles HTML responses; or periodically scrape the public calendar page for key bills.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Would improve TIMELINESS (S-3) and enable forward indicators with precise dates.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration">Improvement 2: Swedish opinion poll data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration">Improvement 2: Swedish opinion poll data integration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-swedish-opinion-poll-data-integration"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Problem</strong>: The election-2026-analysis.md and voter-segmentation.md artifacts rely on document-derived inferences for voter sentiment, not actual polling data. No Swedish polling MCP tool is currently available.<br>
 <strong>Recommendation</strong>: Integrate a public polls aggregator (e.g., Wikipedia Swedish polls page or Statistikon.se) into the download pipeline.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Would improve KEY JUDGMENTS confidence by grounding KJ-1 and KJ-2 in real voter sentiment data.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference">Improvement 3: Riksdag vote record cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference">Improvement 3: Riksdag vote record cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-riksdag-vote-record-cross-reference"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Problem</strong>: The coaliti on-mathematics.md seat table uses approximate figures (M≈69, S≈105, SD≈73) rather than verified current Riksdag membership. Vacancies, absences, or changes since election could affect pivotal vote counts.<br>
 <strong>Recommendation</strong>: Call <code>get_ledamot</code> API for all 349 current seats and compute exact party tallies; cross-reference with known departures/appointments.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Would improve PRECISION of coalition mathematics and avoid reporting approximation as fact.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-limitations">Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-limitations">Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Calendar API failure</strong>: Committee hearing dates and floor vote dates are approximate/inferred. See G-1 in intelligence-assessment.md.</li>
 <li><strong>No polling data</strong>: Public opinion analysis uses structural/legislative inference, not survey data.</li>
@@ -4115,7 +4115,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-limitations">Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 <li><strong>Tier-C aggregation</strong>: This is the first run on this date. No prior-cycle sibling analysis folders existed at run time. Cross-reference-map.md documents this limitation.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis applies OSINT methodology per ICD 203, using:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Source authority</strong>: Riksdag API (primary), World Bank data, published motions/interpellations</li>
@@ -4125,7 +4125,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tradecraft-context">Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-month-ahead
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24810574623
 <strong>UTC Timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-23T01:00:00Z
@@ -4133,7 +4133,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Effective Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Lookback Window</strong>: Current session riksmöte 2025/26 (recent 30 days)
 <strong>Analysis Period</strong>: 2026-04-23 → 2026-05-31 (38 days)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability">MCP Server Availability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-availability">MCP Server Availability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4164,7 +4164,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability">MCP Server Availability<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Server</th><th>Status</th><th>Retries</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdag-regering</td><td>✅ Live</td><td>0</td><td><code>get_sync_status</code> 200, sources live</td></tr><tr><td>world-bank</td><td>✅ Live</td><td>0</td><td>GDP growth + inflation retrieved</td></tr><tr><td>scb</td><td>Not queried</td><td>—</td><td>Not required for month-ahead scope</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3">Primary Legislative Corpus (Propositions — L2/L2+/L3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3">Primary Legislative Corpus (Propositions — L2/L2+/L3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4339,7 +4339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-legislative-corpus-propositions--l2l2l3">Primary Legislative
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Department</th><th>Date</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget för 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>L3</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt, el- och gasprisstöd</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner — lag om intäktsdelning</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat- och näringslivsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03218</td><td>Dubbla straff för brott i kriminella nätverk</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-09</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler för unga lagöverträdare</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03217</td><td>Utökat straffrättsligt tjänstemannaansvar</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-09</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03220</td><td>Svenskt bidrag till Natos framskjutna närvaro i Finland</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-09</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernt regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sveriges tillträde — internationell skadeståndskommission Ukraina</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Sveriges anslutning — tribunalen för aggressionsbrottet mot Ukraina</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet vid datadelning inom offentlig förvaltning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>prop</td><td>Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdept</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>En betald polisutbildning</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Nationell strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>skr</td><td>Arbetsmarknadsdept</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2+</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Regler mot bedrägerier via elektroniska kommunikationer</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03243</td><td>Förbättrade regler för tonnagebeskattning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>L2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending">Committee Reports (Betänkanden — Recently Passed or Pending)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending">Committee Reports (Betänkanden — Recently Passed or Pending)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4402,7 +4402,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-committee-reports-betänkanden--recently-passed-or-pending">Committee
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Committee</th><th>Date</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — sänkt drivmedelsskatt + el-/gasprisstöd</td><td>FiU</td><td>2026-04-21</td><td>✅ Passed</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33</td><td>Insyn i beslagtagna digitala handlingar (vilande grundlagsändring)</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Dormant (1st reading)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Tillgänglighetskrav för media (vilande grundlagsändring)</td><td>KU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>Dormant (1st reading)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU28</td><td>Register för alla bostadsrätter</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>✅ Passed</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU27</td><td>Identitetskrav vid lagfart, skydd mot kringgåenden av BRL</td><td>CU</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>✅ Passed</td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>En statlig e-legitimation</td><td>TU</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Pending vote</td></tr><tr><td>HD01MJU19</td><td>Reformering av avfallslagstiftning</td><td>MJU</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>Pending vote</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals">Key Opposition Motions (Against Government Proposals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals">Key Opposition Motions (Against Government Proposals)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4475,7 +4475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-opposition-motions-against-government-proposals">Key Opposition M
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Party</th><th>Against</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>V</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S</td><td>HD03236 fuel tax cut</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>V</td><td>HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>C</td><td>HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03235 deportation rules</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03228 arms regulation</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>V</td><td>HD03228 arms regulation</td><td>2026-04-16</td></tr><tr><td>HD024087</td><td>MP</td><td>HD03229 reception law</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD024080</td><td>S</td><td>HD03229 reception law</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days">Active Interpellations (Selected — Past 14 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days">Active Interpellations (Selected — Past 14 Days)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4552,7 +4552,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-active-interpellations-selected--past-14-days">Active Interpellations
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Topic</th><th>Party</th><th>To Minister</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar</td><td>S</td><td>Finance/Svantesson</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Arbetsgivaravgifter — utnyttjande av sänkning</td><td>S</td><td>Finance/Svantesson</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>S</td><td>Civil/Slottner</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td>S</td><td>Justice/Strömmer</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>S</td><td>Equality/Larsson</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet</td><td>S</td><td>Equality/Larsson</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>Bostadsbyggandet i Stockholmsregionen</td><td>S</td><td>Infrastructure/Carlson</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10433</td><td>Bred skatteöversyn</td><td>S</td><td>Finance/Svantesson</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>Statligt säkerställande — investeringar i vårdbyggnader</td><td>S</td><td>Health/Lann</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden">Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden">Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4580,7 +4580,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-data-world-bank-sweden">Economic Data (World Bank, Sweden)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>2024</th><th>2023</th><th>2022</th><th>2021</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GDP Growth (%)</td><td>0.82</td><td>-0.20</td><td>1.26</td><td>5.23</td></tr><tr><td>Inflation CPI (%)</td><td>2.84</td><td>8.55</td><td>8.37</td><td>2.16</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c">Reference Analyses (Sibling Folders — Tier-C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4607,13 +4607,51 @@ <h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-folders--tier-c">Reference Analyses (Sibli
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Status</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/</td><td>Prior cycle</td><td>Not yet available — no prior analysis folders found</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/propositions/</td><td>Prior cycle</td><td>Not yet available</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/committeeReports/</td><td>Prior cycle</td><td>Not yet available</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-assessment">Data Quality Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-assessment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Completeness</strong>: 20 primary documents retrieved, covering all major policy domains</li>
 <li><strong>Depth distribution</strong>: L3 (2), L2+ (9), L2 (9)</li>
 <li><strong>Calendar API</strong>: HTML error (known issue) — calendar data inferred from document submission dates and standard Riksdag spring session norms</li>
 <li><strong>Full-text</strong>: Available for all listed propositions via riksdagen.se</li>
 <li><strong>Session context</strong>: Riksmöte 2025/26 spring session ends June 2026; ~38 days of parliamentary activity covered</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03217-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03217-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03218-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03218-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03220-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03220-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/HD0399-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD0399-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4671,7 +4709,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:10.127Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:31.624Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html b/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html
index 5a04d8c42c..d3ee41de1f 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Monthly Review April 2026">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.321Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.832Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.321Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:31.832Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monthly Review April 2026","description":"Sweden's April 2026 parliamentary sprint delivered the Kristersson government's final pre-election legislative package. The month's political signature is a fiscal-electoral pivot: HD01FiU48 (4.1…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:10.321Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UFöU3-analysis.md","name":"documents/UFöU3-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monthly Review April 2026","description":"Sweden's April 2026 parliamentary sprint delivered the Kristersson government's final pre-election legislative package. The month's political signature is a fiscal-electoral pivot: HD01FiU48 (4.1…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:31.832Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UFöU3-analysis.md","name":"documents/UFöU3-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,25 +216,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] | <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~143</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's April 2026 parliamentary sprint delivered the Kristersson government's final pre-election legislative package. The month's political signature is a <strong>fiscal-electoral pivot</strong>: HD01FiU48 (4.1 billion SEK fuel tax emergency relief) passed April 22 with an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD supermajority, revealing S's inability to oppose household energy relief 143 days before the September 2026 election. Combined with NATO deployments (UFöU3), energy governance restructuring (HD03240/238/239), and a criminal justice sweep, the government has executed a high-confidence electoral positioning strategy — though healthcare (77 combined reservations across SfU18/SoU16/SoU17) and coalition stress (SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15) present credible vulnerabilities.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026">Decision 1: Electoral Strategy Assessment (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026">Decision 1: Electoral Strategy Assessment (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026"></a></h4>
 <p>The government's pre-election positioning is coherent and professionally executed — fiscal responsibility + household relief + security + immigration delivery. The main risk is the healthcare battleground, where 77 combined committee reservations signal a well-organized opposition offensive.
 <strong>Analyst Recommendation</strong>: Monitor SfU committee deliberations and healthcare regional data for S campaign ammunition. Watch SD-KD healthcare split for escalation signals.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing">Decision 2: Energy Policy and Investment Timing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing">Decision 2: Energy Policy and Investment Timing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing"></a></h4>
 <p>The energy triptych (HD03240/238/239) creates new investment opportunities and regulatory clarity for electricity infrastructure. Miljöprövningsmyndigheten will accelerate permitting. Wind power municipal revenue sharing (HD03239) resolves a key local opposition barrier.
 <strong>Analyst Recommendation</strong>: Investors in Swedish electricity production and renewable energy should note the regulatory framework stabilization as a positive signal.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact">Decision 3: Defence and Security Business Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact">Decision 3: Defence and Security Business Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>UFöU3 (1,200 troops eFP Finland) + HD03214 (cybersecurity) + HD03228 (war materiel) signal continued high defence spending. Sweden's defence industrial base is being modernized through cleaner war materiel regulations.
 <strong>Analyst Recommendation</strong>: Defence and cybersecurity sector companies should note accelerated procurement and regulatory modernization signals.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-key-bullets">60-Second Read: Key Bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-key-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-key-bullets">60-Second Read: Key Bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-key-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 22</strong>: HD01FiU48 (4.1 GSEK fuel tax relief) enacted — M+SD+<strong>S</strong>+KD supermajority signals S's electoral vulnerability on energy costs</li>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 13</strong>: Vårproposition (HD03100) + Vårändringsbudget (HD0399) — final pre-election fiscal framework</li>
@@ -246,11 +246,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-key-bullets">60-Second Read: Key Bullets<a class="" ar
 <li>🟢 <strong>Cross-party</strong>: Defence and NATO measures pass with cross-party consensus — government strength</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">⚡ Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">⚡ Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Monitor</strong>: FiU48's post-adoption public opinion tracking — if household energy cost relief translates to M/KD/L polling gains, S's dual-track "symbolic opposition + practical support" strategy has failed. If S maintains or gains polling share despite April 22 vote, their message discipline is effective.
 <strong>Trigger date</strong>: First post-April 22 opinion polls (expected late April/early May 2026).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-distribution">📊 Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">📊 Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--confidence-distribution">📊 Confidence Distribution<a class="" ari
     "MEDIUM [B3]" : 15
     "LOW [C4]" : 5</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--full-analysis-references">🔗 Full Analysis References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--full-analysis-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-full-analysis-references">🔗 Full Analysis References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-analysis-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis Summary</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md">Significance Scoring</a></li>
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--full-analysis-references">🔗 Full Analysis References<a class="" a
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md">Forward Indicators</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: DIW weighting per synthesis-methodology.md; Tier-C 1.5× period multiplier
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Overall Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]
 <strong>Days to Election 2026</strong>: ~143 (September 13, 2026)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY: The Spring 2026 Electoral Pivot — Government's Pre-Election Legislative Blitz and Fiscal Gamble</strong></p>
 <p>The 30-day period March 24 – April 23, 2026 constitutes the most consequential parliamentary month of the 2025/26 riksmöte. The Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) delivered its final comprehensive legislative package before the September 2026 election: a spring fiscal triple-pack (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236), an energy transformation triptych (HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239), a security and defence cluster (HD03214 + HD03228 + UFöU3), and a criminal justice overhaul. The political climax arrived April 22 when HD01FiU48 (the fuel tax emergency budget) passed with an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD supermajority — revealing the limits of S's climate positioning when household energy costs dominate the political agenda 143 days before election day.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY: Healthcare as the Defining Domestic Battleground</strong></p>
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>TERTIARY: NATO Finland Deployment — Sweden's Post-Membership Defence Trajectory</strong></p>
 <p>UFöU3 authorizing 1,200 troops for NATO enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) in Finland through December 2026 is the period's most consequential foreign/security decision. Combined with HD03214 (cybersecurity), HD03228 (war materiel), and HD03214 (cybersecurity center), Sweden's post-NATO accession legislative framework is now substantially in place.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0', 'primaryBorderColor': '#00d9ff', 'lineColor': '#ff006e', 'secondaryColor': '#0a0e27', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     A["🔴 TIER 1 — DIW 9.5&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48: 4.1 GSEK Budget ENACTED&#x3C;br/>M+SD+S+KD supermajority | April 22&#x3C;br/>Confidence: HIGH [A1]"]
@@ -347,19 +347,19 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence
     style G fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#000000
     style H fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#000000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1">Theme 1: The Electoral Fiscal Gamble [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1">Theme 1: The Electoral Fiscal Gamble [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The government's spring budget package is its last major fiscal statement before voters. Three interconnected propositions — the Vårproposition (HD03100/Prop. 2025/26:100), Vårändringsbudget (HD0399/Prop. 2025/26:99), and the Extra Ändringsbudget cutting fuel taxes (HD03236/Prop. 2025/26:236) — represent a carefully calibrated pre-election offer. The April 22 adoption of HD01FiU48 by an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD majority demonstrates that S was unwilling to be seen as blocking household energy relief, even at the cost of strategic consistency on climate. Finance Minister Svantesson (M) has positioned the Tidö government as fiscally responsible defenders of household purchasing power.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1">Theme 2: Energy Transition — Triptych Reform [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1">Theme 2: Energy Transition — Triptych Reform [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Three propositions tabled April 14 — HD03240 (new electricity system laws), HD03238 (new environmental permitting authority Miljöprövningsmyndigheten), and HD03239 (wind power municipal revenue reform) — represent the most comprehensive restructuring of Sweden's energy governance framework in a decade. The creation of Miljöprövningsmyndigheten is particularly significant: it explicitly accelerates permitting for electricity production infrastructure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1">Theme 3: Security and Defence Legislative Framework [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1">Theme 3: Security and Defence Legislative Framework [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's NATO membership has generated a substantial legislative agenda. UFöU3 (1,200 troops eFP Finland), HD03214 (cybersecurity center), and HD03228 (war materiel modernization) represent the core legislative architecture of post-NATO Sweden. The cross-party consensus on defence is structurally important — it isolates SD's occasional dissent on social policy and positions security as a government strength heading into the election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1">Theme 4: Healthcare and Social Insurance Battleground [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1">Theme 4: Healthcare and Social Insurance Battleground [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>With 77 total reservations across SfU18 + SoU16 + SoU17, healthcare and social insurance are the opposition's primary vulnerability-targeting domain. The SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15 is the most analytically significant coalition signal of the month — representing a substantive policy disagreement between the government's two most conservative support pillars. This will be amplified during the election campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1">Theme 5: Immigration Enforcement Acceleration [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1">Theme 5: Immigration Enforcement Acceleration [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Three immigration measures (HD03235 criminal deportation, new reception act, settlement act) represent the Tidö coalition's most ideologically SD-driven deliverables. HD03235 carries the highest ECHR risk (L×I score 15/25) but is also the most electorally potent for SD.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Methodology</strong>: F3EAD (Find-Fix-Finish-Exploit-Analyze-Disseminate) applied across all 5 themes. SAT techniques: SWOT, Scenario Analysis, ACH, Red Team, Coalition Mathematics, Historical Parallels.</p>
 <p><strong>Uncertainty flags</strong>: Electoral projections ([B2]) rely on current seat data without live polling. ECHR timeline ([C3]) is speculative. Post-election formation ([C4]) has low confidence.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>: "Sweden's April 2026 Parliamentary Sprint: How the Kristersson Government Positioned Itself for September's Election"</li>
 <li><strong>Recommended Title (SV)</strong>: "Sveriges riksdag april 2026: Hur Kristerssonregeringen positionerade sig inför septembervalet"</li>
@@ -431,32 +431,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>: "Månadsöversikt: 30 dagars riksdagspolitik — bränsleskattelättnader, NATO-insatser, energireform och sjukvårdsstriden inför valet 2026."</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ICD 203 Key Judgments + Admiralty Code + WEP Kent Scale
 <strong>Period</strong>: March 24 – April 23, 2026
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] — PRIMARY JUDGMENT</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1">KJ-1: HD01FiU48 Enactment Strengthens Government's Pre-Election Positioning [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1">KJ-1: HD01FiU48 Enactment Strengthens Government's Pre-Election Positioning [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The Kristersson government enacted HD01FiU48 on April 22 with M+SD+S+KD majority support, delivering 82 öre/litre fuel tax relief effective May 2026. This represents the government's most significant pre-election economic win. S's tactical affirmative vote further validates the measure's cross-spectrum appeal and may blunt opposition criticism on household living costs.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [A1] — multiple primary sources confirming enactment; World Bank economic data supports stable macro baseline; cross-party vote is verifiable parliamentary record.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Highly likely</strong> the fuel relief will be a positive electoral factor for the governing coalition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2">KJ-2: 77 Committee Reservations Represent the Opposition's Primary Electoral Weapon [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2">KJ-2: 77 Committee Reservations Represent the Opposition's Primary Electoral Weapon [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2"></a></h4>
 <p>The aggregated 77 committee reservations across SfU18 (39), SoU16 (20), and SoU17 (18) constitute the largest coordinated opposition documentation campaign in the 2024/25 riksmöte. Combined with S's Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) and SD's challenges to M (HD10429), the opposition's welfare-state narrative is fully operationalised.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [A2] — official parliamentary documents; committee reservation counts are verifiable from riksdagen.se.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Likely</strong> the welfare narrative will remain the opposition's primary attack vector through September 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2">KJ-3: SD-M Demonstrations Fracture Does Not Yet Threaten Coalition Survival [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2">KJ-3: SD-M Demonstrations Fracture Does Not Yet Threaten Coalition Survival [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2"></a></h4>
 <p>SD's formal interpellation HD10429 against Justice Minister Strömmer on demonstration rights represents an unprecedented intra-coalition challenge, but does not constitute a vote against the government. SD retains every incentive to maintain coalition support through the September 2026 election. The fracture remains symbolic and tactical.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [B2] — HD10429 confirms the interpellation exists; absence of SD motion or vote signal is inferential.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Unlikely</strong> the SD-M fracture will lead to a government collapse before September 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1">KJ-4: UFöU3 NATO Finland Deployment Establishes Sweden as Credible Alliance Member [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1">KJ-4: UFöU3 NATO Finland Deployment Establishes Sweden as Credible Alliance Member [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The Foreign Affairs Committee's UFöU3 authorising deployment of 1,200 Swedish troops to NATO's eFP in Finland pending June 4 Chamber vote has broad cross-party support. This represents Sweden's most significant NATO post-accession commitment and cements Sweden's security contribution.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [A1] — UFöU3 document confirmed via riksdagen-regering MCP; government position confirmed.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Almost certain</strong> the June 4 vote will approve UFöU3 given current political alignment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract">Prior-Cycle PIR Resolution (Tier-C Continuity Contract)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review">Carried-forward PIRs from analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract">Prior-Cycle PIR Resolution (Tier-C Continuity Contract)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review">Carried-forward PIRs from analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review">Carr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior-cycle PIR</th><th>Status</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Residual PIR?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1: Spring budget outcome — will FiU48 pass?</td><td><strong>CLOSED — Resolved YES</strong></td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted April 22 [A1]</td><td>No — new PIR-1 issued below</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2: SD-KD healthcare fracture depth</td><td><strong>ONGOING — Depth confirmed</strong></td><td>SoU17 R15 KD-SD reservation; not yet government crisis [A2]</td><td>Yes — carries forward as PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3: NATO deployment confirmation</td><td><strong>PROGRESSING — UFöU3 before Chamber</strong></td><td>June 4 decision pending [A1]</td><td>Yes — carries forward as PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4: Energy reform legislative timeline</td><td><strong>PROGRESSING</strong></td><td>HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239 in committee [A2]</td><td>Yes — carries forward as PIR-4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026">Issued PIRs — Carrying Forward to May 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026">Issued PIRs — Carrying Forward to May 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026">Issued PIRs — Carrying F
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Question</th><th>Priority</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1</td><td>Will S's healthcare offensive convert to polling lead?</td><td>HIGH</td><td>June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2</td><td>Will KD-SD healthcare fracture (SoU17 R15) escalate to a vote against government?</td><td>HIGH</td><td>June–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3</td><td>Will UFöU3 pass June 4 Chamber vote?</td><td>HIGH</td><td>June 4, 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4</td><td>Will ECHR issue interim measure challenging HD03235?</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>June–December 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5</td><td>Will autumn budget incorporate healthcare increase satisfying KD?</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>September 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Analytic product</th><th>SAT used</th><th>ICD 203 standard</th><th>Improvement flag</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1 FiU48</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>Standards 1, 2, 3</td><td>No improvement needed — [A1] confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2 77 reservations</td><td>Indicator analysis</td><td>Standards 1, 3, 5</td><td>Tracking required for election conversion</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3 SD-M fracture</td><td>ACH (H3 — deliberately signal vs. real)</td><td>Standards 4, 8</td><td>Mirror-imaging risk: do not assume SD's stated position is theater</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-4 NATO Finland</td><td>Signposts</td><td>Standards 1, 2</td><td>June 4 vote will confirm or disconfirm</td></tr><tr><td>PIR resolution</td><td>Structured transition</td><td>Standard 6</td><td>Residual PIRs properly carried forward</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>OSINT collection basis</strong>: All evidence derived from offentlighetsprincipen-compliant public sources — riksdagen.se official records, World Bank Open Data, Regeringen.se. No private communications referenced. GDPR Art. 9(2)(e) applies to all named political actors in their official capacity.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution-summary">Confidence Distribution Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution-summary">Confidence Distribution Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 pie title Admiralty Confidence Distribution — April 2026 Assessment
     "A1 — Completely reliable / Confirmed" : 8
@@ -592,13 +592,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution-summary">Confidence Distribution Summary<a cl
     "B3 — Usually reliable / Possibly true" : 2
     "C3 — Fairly reliable / Possibly true" : 2</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: DIW weighting (Depth × Impact × Width) — ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-rankings">DIW-Weighted Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-rankings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100">Tier 1 — Critical Significance (DIW 9.0–10.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-rankings">DIW-Weighted Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-rankings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100">Tier 1 — Critical Significance (DIW 9.0–10.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD01FiU48 / HD03236</strong> — Extra Ändringsbudget: Fuel tax relief 4.1 GSEK [A1]</p>
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100">Tier 1 — Critical Signific
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589">Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW 7.5–8.9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589">Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW 7.5–8.9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589"></a></h4>
 <ol start="3">
 <li>
 <p><strong>UFöU3</strong> — NATO eFP Finland: 1,200 troops authorized [A1]</p>
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589">Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074">Tier 3 — Medium Significance (DIW 6.0–7.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074">Tier 3 — Medium Significance (DIW 6.0–7.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074"></a></h4>
 <ol start="6">
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03235</strong> — Criminal deportation rules [A1]</p>
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074">Tier 3 — Medium Significance
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Effect on Rankings</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S uses healthcare as primary election issue</td><td>SfU18+SoU16+17 rise to Tier 1</td><td>HIGH [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR ruling on HD03235</td><td>Criminal deportation rises to Tier 1</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy price spike before election</td><td>HD03236/FiU48 remain most salient</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition collapse (SD leaves)</td><td>All legislative outcomes recalibrate</td><td>LOW [C4]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram">Ranking Mermaid Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram">Ranking Mermaid Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Scores — Monthly Review April 2026"
@@ -756,13 +756,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram">Ranking Mermaid Diagram<a class="" aria-hidd
     y-axis "DIW Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [9.5, 9.2, 8.5, 8.3, 8.0, 7.5, 7.2, 7.0, 6.8, 6.7]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Per-party framing analysis + narrative control assessment
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-governing-bloc-framing">Governing Bloc Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-bloc-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame">M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Competence Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-bloc-framing">Governing Bloc Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-bloc-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame">M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Competence Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "We manage Sweden's economy responsibly — HD03100 spring bill + HD01FiU48 household relief proves fiscal leadership."
 <strong>Key messages</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -771,15 +771,15 @@ <h3 id="rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame">M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Co
 <li>"Crime down — criminal deportation law enacted" (HD03235)</li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Framing risk</strong>: S's interpellation series (HD10442) targets Finance Minister Svantesson directly — court ruling potentially contradicting Svantesson's statements. M must counter with factual rebuttal.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) — Order and Identity Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) — Order and Identity Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "SD delivers on immigration and enforcement — HD03235 is SD's biggest win in 2025/26."
 <strong>Contradictory signal</strong>: HD10429 interpellation against M's Strömmer on demonstrations — SD must reconcile "order" frame with civil-liberties dispute.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame">KD — Social-Christian Values Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame">KD — Social-Christian Values Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "Family, healthcare, Christian values — SoU17 R15 signals we will not accept healthcare cuts."
 <strong>Framing vulnerability</strong>: KD's SoU17 R15 reservation publicly distances KD from SD on healthcare — useful for KD differentiation but signals coalition fragility to voters.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame">S — Responsible Opposition Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame">S — Responsible Opposition Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "We vote yes when it helps Swedes (FiU48), no when it hurts (SfU18/SoU16/SoU17). We are the responsible alternative."
 <strong>Strategic advantage</strong>: Cross-party FiU48 vote appears "statesmanlike." Simultaneous interpellation offensive (HD10442) maintains critical distance.
 <strong>Key messages</strong>:</p>
@@ -788,17 +788,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame">S — Responsible Opposition Frame<a
 <li>"Finance Minister Svantesson misled the Riksdag" (HD10442 claim)</li>
 <li>"We supported fuel relief because Swedes needed it — not the government"</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-v--progressive-flank-frame">V — Progressive Flank Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--progressive-flank-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v--progressive-flank-frame">V — Progressive Flank Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--progressive-flank-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "S is too centrist — V is the party of real welfare state defence."
 <strong>Risk</strong>: If S moves to centre, V may lose voters who prefer a clear left alternative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-mp--climate-first-frame">MP — Climate First Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--climate-first-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp--climate-first-frame">MP — Climate First Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--climate-first-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "HD024082 fuel counter-motion shows only MP puts climate first."
 <strong>Risk</strong>: FiU48 + S's yes vote signals climate concerns secondary to household costs — MP narrative is weakened.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame">C — Market Liberal Pragmatist Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame">C — Market Liberal Pragmatist Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "We support energy reform (HD03240 abstained on FiU48) and housing (HC023443) — we are the sensible centre."
 <strong>Strategic opportunity</strong>: C abstained on FiU48 — preserves both coalition and opposition options. C is the true pivot party.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-control-assessment">Narrative Control Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-control-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-control-assessment">Narrative Control Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-control-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Media Narrative Strength by Party (April 2026)"
@@ -807,12 +807,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-control-assessment">Narrative Control Assessment<a class=""
     bar [7, 7, 5, 5, 8, 6, 4, 6]</pre>
 <p><strong>Top finding</strong>: S has the strongest current narrative (8/10) — responsible opposition + accountability offensive. M and SD tied at 7/10. MP weakest at 4/10 following FiU48 cross-party energy passage.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder matrix + influence network
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Interest</th><th>Influence</th><th>Stance</th><th>Named actors</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td>Government lead</td><td>Fiscal credibility + security</td><td>10/10</td><td>Delivering pre-election package</td><td>PM Svantesson, Finance Min. E. Svantesson</td><td>HD03100 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</td><td>Governing support</td><td>Immigration enforcement + SD voter satisfaction</td><td>9/10</td><td>Compliant on most issues; fracture on demonstrations (HD10429)</td><td>Jimmie Åkesson, Farivar</td><td>HD10429 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td>Coalition junior</td><td>Social conservatism + healthcare</td><td>7/10</td><td>Delivering on healthcare competence (HD03216) but fracturing on SoU17 R15</td><td>Ebba Busch, Elisabet Lann</td><td>HD01SoU17 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>L (Liberalerna)</td><td>Coalition junior</td><td>Civil liberties + education</td><td>6/10</td><td>Supporting energy package; PM Lotta Edholm co-signed HD03236</td><td>Lotta Edholm, Paulina Brandberg</td><td>HD03245 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>S (Socialdemokraterna)</td><td>Main opposition</td><td>Return to power; healthcare</td><td>9/10</td><td>Coordinated accountability offensive; strategically voted for FiU48 on energy costs</td><td>Håkan Juholt (absent), named: Gunilla Carlsson, Serkan Köse, Marie Olsson</td><td>HD10442, HD01FiU48 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Progressive welfare state</td><td>6/10</td><td>Consistent opposition on immigration, healthcare, civil rights</td><td>Gudrun Nordborg, Nadja Awad</td><td>HC023444, HC023445 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>MP (Miljöpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Climate + civil rights</td><td>5/10</td><td>Filed climate counter-motions (HD024082) on fuel tax; outflanked by S's FiU48 vote</td><td>Märta Stenevi, Jan Riise, Mats Berglund</td><td>HD024082 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>C (Centerpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Market liberal + rural</td><td>5/10</td><td>Active on housing (HC023443) and LGBTQI (HD10431); pragmatic on energy</td><td>Alireza Akhondi, Catarina Deremar</td><td>HC023437 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>FöU committee</td><td>Parliamentary oversight</td><td>Defence and security</td><td>7/10</td><td>Advancing NATO/defence legislation with broad consensus</td><td>Committee chair</td><td>UFöU3 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish public</td><td>Electorate</td><td>Household energy costs</td><td>N/A</td><td>Broadly supportive of fuel tax relief based on HD01FiU48 passage</td><td>N/A</td><td>World Bank unemployment data</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 graph TD
     GOV["🏛️ Kristersson Government&#x3C;br/>M + KD + L (+ SD support)"]
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style MP fill:#006400,stroke:#006400,color:#FFFFFF
     style C fill:#009933,stroke:#009933,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026">Winner/Loser Analysis — April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026">Winner/Loser Analysis — April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1012,12 +1012,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026">Winner/Loser Analysis — April 202
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Win/Loss</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Svantesson)</td><td><strong>WIN</strong> — spring fiscal package adopted</td><td>HD03100 + FiU48 enacted [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td><strong>MIXED</strong> — immigration delivered; demonstrations conflict [A2]</td><td>HD03235 vs HD10429</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td><strong>NEUTRAL</strong> — healthcare delivered (HD03216) but coalition fracture visible</td><td>SoU17 R15 [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td><strong>TACTICAL WIN</strong> — FiU48 vote shows pragmatism; accountability offensive maintains pressure</td><td>HD10442 series [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td><strong>LOSS</strong> — outflanked on energy; climate narrative diluted by S's FiU48 vote</td><td>HD024082 vs FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish households</td><td><strong>WIN</strong> — 82 öre/l petrol relief May–September 2026</td><td>HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability</td><td><strong>WIN</strong> — HD03231 + HD03232 establish Sweden as serious rule-of-law actor</td><td>riksdagen.se [A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ≥10 dated forward indicators across 4 horizons
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026">Horizon 1: Immediate (April 24 – May 31, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026">Horizon 1: Immediate (April 24 – May 31, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026">Horizon 1: Immediate (Apri
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-01</td><td>FiU48 fuel tax relief activates (82 öre/l)</td><td>May 1, 2026</td><td>Petrol prices drop; government takes credit</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>FI-02</td><td>Svantesson responds to HD10442 interpellation series</td><td>April–May 2026</td><td>Response admission vs. denial shapes narrative</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-03</td><td>Strömmer responds to HD10429 SD interpellation</td><td>April–May 2026</td><td>Tone: conciliatory vs. dismissive affects SD cooperation</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-04</td><td>HD03235 criminal deportation first enforcement case</td><td>May 2026</td><td>ECHR interim measure filing triggered?</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026">Horizon 2: Short-term (June – August 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026">Horizon 2: Short-term (June – August 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026">Horizon 2: Short-term (June 
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-05</td><td>UFöU3 NATO Finland Chamber vote</td><td>June 4, 2026</td><td>Margin > 200 seats = broad consensus; &#x3C; 175 = surprise</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>FI-06</td><td>Riksdag summer recess budget communications</td><td>June 2026</td><td>Will government announce autumn budget healthcare allocation?</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-07</td><td>ECHR formal filing on HD03235</td><td>June–August 2026</td><td>ECHR registration confirms SD deportation law is challenged</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-08</td><td>SCB Q1 2026 GDP data release</td><td>May 2026</td><td>If GDP > 1%: government economic narrative strengthens</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-09</td><td>Party leader polls — SD vs. M dynamic</td><td>June 2026</td><td>If SD > 25%: SD demands greater coalition role</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-10</td><td>Energy committee final report on HD03240</td><td>August 2026</td><td>Legislative timeline for autumn confirms energy reform pace</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026">Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026">Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026">Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-11</td><td>Valmyndigheten advance voting opens</td><td>August 26, 2026</td><td>Turnout patterns indicate which bloc is mobilised</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-12</td><td>September 13 election result</td><td>September 13, 2026</td><td>S+V+MP+C ≥ 175: government change; Governing bloc ≥ 175: re-election</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026">Horizon 4: Post-Election (October 2026+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026">Horizon 4: Post-Election (October 2026+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026">Horizon 4: Post-Election (Octob
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-13</td><td>Talman (Speaker) initiates government formation</td><td>September 2026</td><td>First exploration round signals majority path</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-14</td><td>HD01KU32 constitutional re-approval vote</td><td>October 2026</td><td>New majority votes on media-accessibility constitutional amendment</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicators-summary">Indicators Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicators-summary">Indicators Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -1197,12 +1197,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicators-summary">Indicators Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     FI-14 KU32 re-approval :2026-10-01, 2026-10-31</pre>
 <p><strong>Total indicators</strong>: 14 across 4 horizons. Threshold requirement met (≥10). [A1]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: F3EAD Exploit→Analyze; Kent Scale probability bands
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH [B1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1246,75 +1246,75 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Name</th><th>Probability</th><th>Kent</th><th>Timeframe</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1</td><td>Government survives — fiscal wins dominate</td><td>40%</td><td>Roughly even</td><td>Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S-2</td><td>Narrow S-led government after election</td><td>30%</td><td>Unlikely</td><td>Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S-3</td><td>SD achieves major gains; pushes M further right</td><td>20%</td><td>Very unlikely</td><td>Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S-4</td><td>Coalition collapse before election</td><td>10%</td><td>Remote</td><td>June–Aug 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total: 100%</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40">S-1: Government Survives — Fiscal Wins Dominate (40%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40">S-1: Government Survives — Fiscal Wins Dominate (40%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p>The Kristersson government capitalizes on HD01FiU48 household fuel relief, HD03100 spring economic bill, and NATO-deployment achievement (UFöU3). Unemployment declining, inflation contained at 2.84% — economic management narrative holds. SD and KD demonstrations-healthcare fractures remain verbal, not structural. Election: M+SD+KD+L return with slim majority (≥175 seats).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 enacted April 22 — cross-party support (M+SD+S+KD) signals economic competence [A1]</li>
 <li>World Bank: GDP growth 0.82%, unemployment 8.69% — stable base</li>
 <li>NATO Finland deployment (UFöU3) plays to security-focused voters</li>
 <li>S's tactical FiU48 vote reduces opposition's ability to attack government on energy</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>SD-M demonstrations fracture does not escalate beyond interpellation</li>
 <li>ECHR does not issue interim measure on HD03235 before election</li>
 <li>No major scandal emerges before September 13</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-wild-card">Wild card<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wild-card">Wild card<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card"></a></h4>
 <p>KD-SD healthcare fracture (SoU17 R15) escalates — KD signals it will not pass next healthcare funding bill without additional appropriation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30">S-2: Narrow S-Led Government After Election (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative-1">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30">S-2: Narrow S-Led Government After Election (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative-1">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-1"></a></h4>
 <p>S successfully exploits welfare-state narrative built on 77 committee reservations (SfU18+SoU16+SoU17). S+V+MP+C form narrow majority (≥175 seats). FiU48 energy relief proves insufficient — voters prioritise healthcare. New government rolls back HD03235, re-opens NATO deployment for debate.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>77 cumulative opposition reservations represent largest coordinated campaign in 2025/26 [A2]</li>
 <li>S's Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) shows strategic focus</li>
 <li>SoU17 R15: KD fracture provides S with cross-coalition evidence of government failure</li>
 <li>Historical: S recovered from 2022 defeat faster than expected</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required-1">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required-1">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-1"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>Healthcare spending remains top voter concern through September</li>
 <li>S successfully converts Svantesson accountability offensive into voter movement</li>
 <li>No S internal scandals</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20">S-3: SD Major Gains — M Pushed Further Right (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative-2">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20">S-3: SD Major Gains — M Pushed Further Right (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative-2">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-2"></a></h4>
 <p>SD achieves 25%+ in polls. SD demands larger role in government, potentially PM candidacy or formal coalition membership. M forced to concede more on immigration/criminal justice. ECHR challenge to HD03235 dismissed — SD vindicated.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10429 (SD challenges M) signals SD's growing assertiveness [B2]</li>
 <li>HD03235 (criminal deportation) is SD's core voter-mobilization policy</li>
 <li>If ECHR upholds HD03235: SD gains major credibility boost</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required-2">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required-2">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-2"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>ECHR does not issue adverse ruling on HD03235 before election</li>
 <li>Major immigration/crime incident amplified in media</li>
 <li>SD successfully distinguishes itself from M on demonstrations/civil liberties</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10">S-4: Coalition Collapse Before Election (10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative-3">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10">S-4: Coalition Collapse Before Election (10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative-3">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-3"></a></h4>
 <p>SD withholds support on a critical budget vote in June/July. Emergency SD-S-V situation. Early election or minority government operating under SD's demands escalate beyond acceptable levels for M/KD/L.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10429: SD publicly challenges M on demonstrations — crossing formal interpellation line [B2]</li>
 <li>SoU17 R15: KD healthcare fracture creates second pressure point</li>
 <li>If both fractures converge on same autumn bill, loss of majority in chamber possible</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required-3">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required-3">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-3"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>SD and KD jointly oppose a government bill in same vote</li>
 <li>S refuses to provide replacement support</li>
 <li>Constitutional mechanism for constructive vote of no confidence invoked</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-timeline">Scenario Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-timeline">Scenario Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 gantt
     title Scenario Activation Timeline
@@ -1330,12 +1330,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-timeline">Scenario Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     section S-4 Coalition Collapse
     Risk window — autumn budget :2026-06-01, 2026-08-31</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 5-dimension register, L×I scoring, cascading chains
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1442,8 +1442,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1–5)</th><th>Impact (1–5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Category</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>Healthcare battle escalates to coalition crisis (SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15)</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td><strong>15</strong></td><td>Political/Coalition</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>ECHR challenge to HD03235 criminal deportation produces adverse ruling before election</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Legal/Constitutional</td><td>B3</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>S accountability offensive on Svantesson (HD10442 series) produces ministerial resignation</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Political/Personnel</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Energy prices fall before election — FiU48 relief looks retroactively unnecessary and fiscally irresponsible</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Economic/Political</td><td>B3</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>SD escalates challenge to Justice Minister (HD10429 demonstrations) — coalition rupture before election</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>Coalition/Stability</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>UFöU3 (1,200 troops Finland) triggers Russian escalation response</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>Security/International</td><td>B3</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Miljöprövningsmyndigheten (HD03238) delayed by judicial review or implementation challenges</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>Administrative/Regulatory</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Opposition builds coherent anti-government welfare narrative from 77 reservations</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>Electoral/Political</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>R9</td><td>Wind power (HD03239) municipal buy-in fails — renewable buildout stalls</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>Energy/Climate</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Coalition majority collapses pre-election — vote of no confidence</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>Constitutional/Political</td><td>C4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse">Chain A: Healthcare → Coalition Collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse">Chain A: Healthcare → Coalition Collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>SoU17 R15 SD-KD fracture [R1 → L3/I5]
 → Healthcare debate escalation in campaign
 → SD demands policy concessions to maintain support
@@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse">Chain A: Healthcare → Coali
 → [R10 → L2/I5] Loss of coalition majority
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 15% (Unlikely, WEP standard). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html</a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation">Chain B: Accountability → Finance Minister Resignation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation">Chain B: Accountability → Finance Minister Resignation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) [R3]
 → Potential false-statement allegation
 → Media escalation
@@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation">Chain B: Accoun
 → Resignation or ministerial crisis (election year)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 10% (Very unlikely, WEP). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html</a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative">Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative">Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>77 reservations [R8 → L4/I4]
 → S + V + MP coordinated healthcare campaign
 → Opinion polls shift on healthcare competence
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative">Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narra
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 45% (Roughly even, WEP). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update">Posterior Probability Assessment (Bayesian update)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update">Posterior Probability Assessment (Bayesian update)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update">Posterior Probabili
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Prior P</th><th>Update trigger</th><th>Posterior P</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R8 opposition welfare narrative</td><td>40%</td><td>S already filing 5 Svantesson interpellations in 48 hrs</td><td><strong>55%</strong> [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>R1 healthcare coalition crisis</td><td>15%</td><td>SD-KD fracture documented in SoU17 R15</td><td><strong>20%</strong> [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R2 ECHR HD03235</td><td>20%</td><td>ECHR rapporteur precedents on similar laws</td><td><strong>22%</strong> [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R5 SD-M rupture</td><td>10%</td><td>HD10429 is formal challenge, not just rhetoric</td><td><strong>15%</strong> [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Risk Heatmap — L×I Scores (April 2026)"
@@ -1514,12 +1514,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     y-axis "L×I Score" 0 --> 20
     bar [16, 15, 10, 9, 8, 8, 6, 6, 5, 5]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: SWOT + TOWS matrix | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-framework">SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-framework">SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Comprehensive pre-election delivery</strong>: Government tabled its final legislative package including spring budget (HD03100, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html</a>), fuel relief (HD01FiU48, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html</a>), and energy reform (HD03240) [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-party defence consensus</strong>: UFöU3 (NATO Finland, 1,200 troops) passed with cross-party support — security is a government strength [A1]</li>
@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <li><strong>Fiscal credibility</strong>: Surplus rule maintained in Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100); Svantesson framing "responsible but caring" fiscal management [A2]</li>
 <li><strong>Energy governance modernization</strong>: Miljöprövningsmyndigheten (HD03238) addresses Sweden's notoriously slow permitting — business community broadly supportive [A2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Healthcare vulnerability</strong>: SfU18 (39 reservations), SoU16 (20 reservations), SoU17 (18 reservations) = 77 total reservations across 3 committees — deepest opposition battleground of the session [A1, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a>]</li>
 <li><strong>SD-KD coalition stress</strong>: Joint SD-KD reservation on SoU17 R15 reveals healthcare prioritization disagreement within governing support base [A1, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html</a>]</li>
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li><strong>Fiscal deterioration signal</strong>: 4.1 GSEK HD01FiU48 emergency spending increases deficit — critics note structural inconsistency with surplus rule narrative [A2]</li>
 <li><strong>Unemployment elevated</strong>: 8.69% unemployment (2025 World Bank data) — highest in a decade among Nordic peers; S's main economic attack vector [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Electoral energy narrative</strong>: If fuel price relief reduces household energy bills visibly before September 2026, it directly validates the government's pre-election promise [B2]</li>
 <li><strong>Wind power local buy-in</strong>: HD03239 (municipal revenue from wind power) resolves the key local acceptance barrier for renewable buildout — potential for M+C+L joint electoral appeal on climate-economy integration [A2]</li>
@@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li><strong>Paid police education (HD03237)</strong>: Broadens police recruitment pipeline — visible anti-crime commitment ahead of election [B2]</li>
 <li><strong>Digital infrastructure</strong>: TU21 (state e-ID) + TU17 (anti-fraud telecoms) create observable digital governance improvements valued by younger voters [B2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Healthcare campaign</strong>: S, V, and MP have built a coherent welfare-state narrative across 77 combined reservations — organized opposition attack on government's most vulnerable flank [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Energy price reversal</strong>: If Middle East tensions ease and energy prices fall before election, HD01FiU48's electoral value diminishes and fiscal deterioration looks opportunistic [B3]</li>
@@ -1552,7 +1552,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <li><strong>Svantesson accountability</strong>: S's coordination of 5 interpellations against Finance Minister Svantesson (HD10442 and series) — including potential false-statement allegation — creates targeted ministerial accountability risk [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths</th><th>Weaknesses</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO — Exploit</strong>: Use energy relief + wind power narrative to claim climate-economy integration leadership</td><td><strong>WO — Improve</strong>: Pre-empt healthcare attacks by fast-tracking SoU committee recommendations; repair SD-KD healthcare rift before campaign</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST — Protect</strong>: Lock in NATO/defence consensus to prevent opposition from finding national security wedge</td><td><strong>WT — Avoid</strong>: Minimize ECHR exposure by pre-complying HD03235 provisions; prevent SD from escalating demonstration-rights conflict</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h3>
 <p>The month's dominant pattern is <strong>electoral positioning under fiscal constraint</strong>: the government uses targeted household relief (energy costs) to compensate for structural weaknesses (healthcare, unemployment) while banking on security/NATO as a non-contested strength. The SD-KD healthcare fracture is the single most dangerous SWOT element — if it widens, it could force a headline coalition crisis during the campaign.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
@@ -1595,13 +1595,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     "Wind power HD03239": [0.55, 0.65]
     "8.7% unemployment": [0.80, 0.10]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political Threat Taxonomy + Attack Tree + MITRE-style TTP mapping
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1">Threat T1: Electoral Welfare Narrative Attack [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1">Threat T1: Electoral Welfare Narrative Attack [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1">Threat T1: Ele
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>Socialdemokraterna (S) + Vänsterpartiet (V) + Miljöpartiet (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>Kristersson government's healthcare and social insurance record</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>77 committee reservations + interpellation series + campaign messaging</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>SfU18 (39 reservations, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a>), SoU16 (20), SoU17 (18) as evidence base</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>Now through September 13, 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-POL-001: Coordinated legislative opposition documentation → T-POL-002: Public opinion amplification → T-POL-003: Ministerial accountability targeting</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2">Threat T2: Intra-Coalition Defection — SD Challenges M [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2">Threat T2: Intra-Coalition Defection — SD Challenges M [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2">Thre
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD) [Farivar et al.]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>HD10429 formal interpellation on demonstration rights restrictions in Prop. 133</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>SD using formal parliamentary mechanism against governing-side party — unprecedented in 2025/26 riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>Immediate; interpellation pending response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-COA-001: Support-party formal dissent → T-COA-002: Public signals to SD voter base → T-COA-003: Coalition renegotiation pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3">Threat T3: Legal/ECHR Challenge to Criminal Deportation [MEDIUM — B3]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3">Threat T3: Legal/ECHR Challenge to Criminal Deportation [MEDIUM — B3]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3">Thr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>NGO network (Human Rights Watch, ECRE, Swedish legal NGOs) + ECHR applicants</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>HD03235 (criminal deportation, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>ECHR proportionality challenge + Swedish constitutional court review</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>L×I risk 15/25; prior ECHR precedents on similar deportation laws</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>6–18 months from enactment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-LEG-001: Challenge filing → T-LEG-002: Interim measures request → T-LEG-003: High-profile case selection</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2">Threat T4: S Accountability Offensive — Svantesson [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2">Threat T4: S Accountability Offensive — Svantesson [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2">Threat T4:
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>Socialdemokraterna (S) finance team</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>5 interpellations in 48 hours (HD10442 series); HD10442 cites court ruling potentially contradicting Svantesson's statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>Systematic ministerial pressure: healthcare spending + fiscal accountability + ätstörningsvård [A1]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>Immediate; response required within parliamentary rules</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-ACC-001: Evidence-based interpellation series → T-ACC-002: Media coordination → T-ACC-003: Confidence erosion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 graph TD
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: Undermine Kristersson Government Before September 2026 Election"]
@@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     style C fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#000000
     style D fill:#F57C00,stroke:#F57C00,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative">Threat Vector Phase Analysis — Threat T1 (Welfare Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative">Threat Vector Phase Analysis — Threat T1 (Welfare Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1825,16 +1825,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative">Threat Vec
 <p><strong>Government countermeasure</strong>: Fast-track SoU committee recommendations; announce healthcare investment in autumn budget preview.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet | <strong>Date</strong>: April 22, 2026 (enacted)
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01FiU48 is the Finance Committee's report authorising a temporary reduction in fuel excise tax of approximately 82 öre per litre effective May 1 through September 30, 2026. The measure provides direct household relief on transport energy costs.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 10/10 (Tier 1 Critical)</p>
 <p>This is the most politically significant enactment of April 2026. Passed with M+SD+S+KD majority — the opposition S party's tactical affirmative vote validates cross-spectrum appeal and creates an unusual cross-coalition consensus on a flagship economic measure.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1857,30 +1857,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable (official Riksdag record)</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed by multiple sources</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-stakeholders">Key Stakeholders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-stakeholders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-stakeholders">Key Stakeholders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-stakeholders"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Proponents</strong>: M (fiscal relief), SD (voter cost-of-living), KD (family budgets), S (tactical)</li>
 <li><strong>Opponents</strong>: V and MP (environmental: petrol demand increase); L (abstained)</li>
 <li><strong>Beneficiaries</strong>: Swedish households — particularly rural and suburban car-dependent</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-domain">Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain">Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <p>Fiscal / Energy / Household economics</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html</a></li>
 <li>HD01FiU48 Riksdagen committee report</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu18">HD01SfU18<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu18"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01SfU18 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Socialförsäkringsutskottet | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01SfU18 is the Social Insurance Committee's report on social insurance reform. It contains 39 opposition reservations — the largest single-document reservation count in the 2025/26 riksmöte.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>39 reservations represent the primary documented evidence for the opposition's welfare-state attack narrative. Combined with SoU16 (20) and SoU17 (18), total 77 reservations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-1">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-1">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1903,21 +1903,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-1">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition (Government Bill)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Finansdepartementet | <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03100 is the government's spring economic proposition — Vårproposition 2026. It contains the fiscal framework for 2026/27, including tax and expenditure adjustments.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 9/10 (Tier 1 Critical)</p>
 <p>The spring economic bill is the government's central pre-election economic message. It establishes the fiscal space narrative for the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-2">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-2">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1940,23 +1940,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-2">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03235">HD03235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03235"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03235 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition (Government Bill)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Justitiedepartementet | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03235 extends criminal deportation rules — individuals convicted of serious crimes can face deportation even if granted Swedish residency/citizenship. This is a Tidöavtalet flagship delivery.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>SD's central immigration enforcement demand. High ECHR proportionality challenge risk (L×I: 15/25). Passed with M+SD majority.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-risk">Key Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-risk">Key Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk"></a></h3>
 <p>ECHR challenge timing is critical. An adverse ECHR ruling before September 13, 2026 would significantly harm SD and M's law-and-order narrative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-3">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-3">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1979,22 +1979,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-3">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10429">HD10429<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10429"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10429 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>From</strong>: SD | <strong>To</strong>: Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)
 <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10429 is SD's interpellation challenging Justice Minister Strömmer on the Prop. 133 demonstration rights restriction. SD objects that the restrictions are too broad and may limit legitimate demonstrations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>This is an unprecedented intra-coalition challenge — a support party formally interpellating a minister from the governing bloc. Signals SD's growing assertiveness and its potential to leverage formal parliamentary mechanisms.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-4">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-4">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2017,22 +2017,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-4">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10442">HD10442<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10442 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>From</strong>: S | <strong>To</strong>: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10442 is one of S's 5 interpellations filed against Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson in a 48-hour period in April 2026. This interpellation concerns ätstörningsvård (eating disorder care) funding, citing a court ruling that potentially contradicts Svantesson's public statements.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 7/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>The five-interpellation series represents a coordinated accountability offensive. The eating disorder care angle — which resonates with healthcare narrative — adds emotional weight to a financial accountability argument.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-5">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-5">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2055,21 +2055,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-5">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-uföu3">UFöU3<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uföu3"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UF%C3%B6U3-analysis.md"><code>documents/UFöU3-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: UFöU3 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Utrikesutskottet/Försvarsutskottet | <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026 (pending Chamber vote June 4)
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>UFöU3 authorises the deployment of 1,200 Swedish troops to NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) battalion in Finland. This is Sweden's largest single military commitment since NATO accession in March 2024.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 9/10 (Tier 1 Critical)</p>
 <p>UFöU3 represents Sweden's most significant NATO post-accession commitment. The broad parliamentary consensus (cross-party support anticipated) signals Sweden's credibility as a NATO ally.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-6">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-6">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2092,19 +2092,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-6">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UF%C3%B6U3.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UFöU3.html</a></li>
 <li>Riksdag committee report on defence deployment</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Electoral projection + coalition viability assessment
 <strong>Election date</strong>: September 13, 2026
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026">Current Seat Projection (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026">Current Seat Projection (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2190,18 +2190,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026">Current Seat Projection (April 20
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Current seats (2022)</th><th>April 2026 projection</th><th>Change</th><th>Coalition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>66–70</td><td>±2</td><td>Governing</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>74–80</td><td>+4</td><td>Governing support</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>17–20</td><td>±2</td><td>Governing</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>15–18</td><td>±2</td><td>Governing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total right bloc</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>172–188</strong></td><td>±10</td><td>Majority if ≥175</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>100–108</td><td>-3</td><td>Opposition lead</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>22–25</td><td>±2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>15–19</td><td>±2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>22–26</td><td>±2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total left-centre bloc</strong></td><td><strong>173</strong></td><td><strong>159–178</strong></td><td>±10</td><td>Minority unless C</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total Riksdag seats</strong>: 349. <strong>Majority threshold</strong>: 175.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-electoral-dynamics">Key Electoral Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-dynamics"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect">1. SD Polarisation Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-electoral-dynamics">Key Electoral Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect">1. SD Polarisation Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect"></a></h4>
 <p>SD at 73 seats is the second-largest party. If SD gains from HD03235 criminal deportation narrative, it could reach 78–80 seats — the most in Swedish electoral history. Counter-risk: ECHR adverse ruling diminishes SD's legal credibility on deportation.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Current seat distribution from riksdag-regering.se ledamöter statistics; WEP: <strong>Roughly even</strong> whether SD gains or holds.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-kd-fragility">2. KD Fragility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-kd-fragility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-kd-fragility">2. KD Fragility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-kd-fragility"></a></h4>
 <p>KD's 19 seats in 2022 represents a historical minimum. SoU17 R15 healthcare fracture signals KD voters may migrate to M or S. If KD falls below 4% threshold: <strong>governing bloc loses 19 seats</strong> — potentially catastrophic.</p>
 <p><strong>KD threshold risk</strong>: WEP: <strong>Unlikely</strong> but non-negligible (10%) if healthcare narrative dominates.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-ss-strategic-position">3. S's Strategic Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ss-strategic-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-ss-strategic-position">3. S's Strategic Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ss-strategic-position"></a></h4>
 <p>S at 107 seats needs C (24 seats) to form majority. C's position is ambiguous — market liberal, could support either bloc. S's FiU48 tactical vote signals S is willing to cooperate with right on energy — may attract C.</p>
 <p><strong>WEP</strong>: <strong>Roughly even</strong> whether C supports S-led or M-led government.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Election 2026 — Projected Seats by Party"
@@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" ari
     y-axis "Projected seats" 0 --> 120
     bar [104, 77, 68, 23, 24, 18, 17, 16]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september">Forward Electoral Indicators (April → September)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september">Forward Electoral Indicators (April → September)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2253,12 +2253,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september">Forward Electoral Indi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Target</th><th>Current status</th><th>Risk if missed</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48 household relief effective</td><td>May 1 2026</td><td>ENACTED — on track</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO deployment vote</td><td>June 4 2026</td><td>Pending Chamber vote</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Autumn budget preview</td><td>August 2026</td><td>Not yet announced</td><td>High — KD fracture</td></tr><tr><td>KD polling floor</td><td>≥5%</td><td>At risk per SoU17 fracture</td><td>Critical</td></tr><tr><td>S-C coalition signal</td><td>Before August</td><td>Not yet signalled</td><td>Medium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Riksdag vote mathematics — 349 seats, 175-seat majority threshold
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result">Seat Distribution — Current Riksdag (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result">Seat Distribution — Current Riksdag (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2327,7 +2327,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result">Seat Distrib
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Bloc</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Largest party</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>Governing support</td><td>2nd largest</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>Governing</td><td>PM party</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Pivot party</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Below historical avg</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>Governing</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>Governing</td><td>Fragility risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Governing bloc (M+KD+L + SD support)</strong>: 176 seats = majority by 1</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026">HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — April 22, 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026">HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — April 22, 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026">HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — A
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Absent</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Governing — full support</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Governing support — full support</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — tactical yes vote</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Governing junior — full support</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>16</td><td>0</td><td>Governing junior — abstained</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — no</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — no</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — abstained</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>267</strong></td><td><strong>42</strong></td><td><strong>40</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td>Result: PASSED</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: HD01FiU48 riksdagen.se — vote passed April 22, 2026 [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes">Pivotal Vote Table — Key Upcoming Votes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes">Pivotal Vote Table — Key Upcoming Votes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2452,7 +2452,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes">Pivotal Vote Table — Key Up
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Vote</th><th>Date</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Required support</th><th>Governing bloc sufficient?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO deployment</td><td>June 4, 2026</td><td>175</td><td>M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Yes — 176 seats</td></tr><tr><td>Autumn budget 2026/27</td><td>September/October 2026</td><td>175</td><td>M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Yes — IF KD stays</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 constitutional re-approval</td><td>Post-election</td><td>175</td><td>M+SD+KD+L or new majority</td><td>Depends on election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-fragility-map">Coalition Fragility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fragility-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-fragility-map">Coalition Fragility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fragility-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 graph TD
     GOV["Governing majority: 176 seats&#x3C;br/>Threshold: 175"]
@@ -2487,9 +2487,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-fragility-map">Coalition Fragility Map<a class="" aria-hidd
     style RISK2 fill:#F57C00,stroke:#F57C00,color:#FFFFFF
     style RISK3 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#ff006e,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-demographic-impact-analysis">Demographic Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-impact-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-demographic-impact-analysis">Demographic Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-impact-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2560,7 +2560,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-demographic-impact-analysis">Demographic Impact Analysis<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Policy impact</th><th>Key document</th><th>Net effect</th><th>Electoral implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Working families (car-dependent, suburban/rural)</td><td>+82 öre/l fuel relief</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td><strong>Positive</strong></td><td>Governing bloc +2–3%</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare workers / NHS patients</td><td>Welfare reform uncertainty</td><td>SfU18 + SoU17</td><td><strong>Negative</strong></td><td>Opposition +1–2%</td></tr><tr><td>Young adults (18–29)</td><td>Housing, demonstration rights</td><td>HC023443 + HD10429</td><td><strong>Mixed</strong></td><td>Volatile — possible SD or C gain</td></tr><tr><td>Pensioners</td><td>Social insurance reform</td><td>SfU18 SoU16</td><td><strong>Uncertain</strong></td><td>High sensitivity to SfU18 changes</td></tr><tr><td>Rural voters</td><td>Fuel relief + agricultural energy</td><td>HD01FiU48 + HD03240</td><td><strong>Positive</strong></td><td>SD + M + C benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Urban professionals</td><td>Civil liberties, climate</td><td>HD10429 + HD024082</td><td><strong>Negative toward governing</strong></td><td>MP + S + L benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Immigrants (naturalised citizens)</td><td>Criminal deportation extension</td><td>HD03235</td><td><strong>Very negative</strong></td><td>S + V benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Defence/security voters</td><td>NATO commitment</td><td>UFöU3</td><td><strong>Positive</strong></td><td>Governing bloc + C benefit</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2604,7 +2604,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Region</th><th>Key concerns</th><th>Governing bloc advantage</th><th>Opposition advantage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Norrland</td><td>Energy costs, rural transport</td><td>HD01FiU48 + HD03240 electricity</td><td>Healthcare access — SoU17</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm</td><td>Housing, civil liberties, climate</td><td>N/A</td><td>MP + S + C</td></tr><tr><td>Skåne</td><td>Immigration enforcement</td><td>HD03235</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Västra Götaland</td><td>Manufacturing, energy costs</td><td>HD01FiU48 + energy package</td><td>Healthcare (regional council governance)</td></tr><tr><td>Gotland / military regions</td><td>Defence, NATO</td><td>UFöU3</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mobilisation-index">Mobilisation Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mobilisation-index"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mobilisation-index">Mobilisation Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mobilisation-index"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Voter Mobilisation Potential by Issue (1=low, 10=high)"
@@ -2613,13 +2613,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-mobilisation-index">Mobilisation Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     bar [8, 9, 7, 6, 7, 5, 6]</pre>
 <p><strong>Top insight</strong>: Healthcare is the highest-mobilisation issue (9/10) and favours the opposition — this is the government's primary vulnerability heading into September 2026.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Nordic + EU comparator analysis
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure">Comparator 1: Finland — Coalition Stability Under Security Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure">Comparator 1: Finland — Coalition Stability Under Security Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026"></a></h4>
 <p>Finland's Orpo government (2023-present) has maintained a right-wing coalition (KOK+PS+SFP+KD) under similar pressures: immigration restrictive policies, welfare-state opposition criticism, and enhanced NATO commitments. Key parallels:</p>
 
 
@@ -2660,8 +2660,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hi
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Finland's Orpo government maintained coalition despite similar fractures. Sweden's coalition fractures (HD10429, SoU17 R15) are structurally comparable — not yet destabilising.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: World Bank Finland GDP data + Nordic Council comparative reports + UFöU3 bilateral agreement</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math">Comparator 2: Germany — Bundestag Post-2025 Coalition Math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math">Comparator 2: Germany — Bundestag Post-2025 Coalition Math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's CDU/CSU-SPD grand coalition (2025-present) represents a model of pragmatic cross-aisle cooperation on energy and security. Relevant to Sweden's HD01FiU48 passage (S voted yes with government on energy relief):</p>
 
 
@@ -2702,8 +2702,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Germany's experience shows cross-party energy cooperation is possible without triggering opposition collapse — S's tactical FiU48 vote mirrors SPD's flexibility in grand coalition.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Bundestag.de energy package records + World Bank Germany GDP 1.1% (2025)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis">Comparator 3: Denmark — Mette Frederiksen's Welfare-Security Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis">Comparator 3: Denmark — Mette Frederiksen's Welfare-Security Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark's SVM-government (S+V+M) under Frederiksen demonstrates that a social-democratic party can govern with right-wing support while maintaining welfare credibility:</p>
 
 
@@ -2739,7 +2739,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: S's tactical FiU48 vote may be part of broader "responsible opposition" strategy — mimicking Danish Frederiksen model to appeal to centrist voters. Healthcare investment gap is Sweden's key differentiation point.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Danish Folketing records + OECD Social Expenditure Database</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-assessment">Summary Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-assessment">Summary Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Nordic Governance Performance Matrix April 2026
@@ -2755,16 +2755,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-assessment">Summary Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     Germany Friedrich: [0.60, 0.50]</pre>
 <p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Sweden's coalition stability is on par with Finland's comparable right-wing government. The key vulnerability relative to Denmark is healthcare investment — the dimension where S can differentiate.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Named precedents ≤40 years from analysis date
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy">Parallel 1: Bildt Government Fiscal Consolidation (1991–94) — Direct Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy">Parallel 1: Bildt Government Fiscal Consolidation (1991–94) — Direct Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h4>
 <p>Carl Bildt's (M) bourgeois four-party coalition (M+KD+FP+C) governed 1991–94. The coalition managed a severe banking crisis while delivering fiscal consolidation. The coalition fractured on several issues but survived to 1994 — only losing to S after three years.</p>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 1991–1994 — within 40 years from 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-2026">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2804,11 +2804,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Even a competent fiscal manager can lose the election to a welfare-state narrative. Bildt's government lost in 1994 despite turning the budget around. Kristersson faces the same risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Swedish government historical records + SIFO polling archives (public records)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model">Parallel 2: Reinfeldt Alliance (2006–2014) — Success Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model">Parallel 2: Reinfeldt Alliance (2006–2014) — Success Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Fredrik Reinfeldt's "Alliance" (M+KD+FP+C) governed for two terms (2006–10, 2010–14). Key achievement: "arbetslinjen" — lowering unemployment by reducing social insurance generosity. Reinfeldt's 2010 re-election (first in M history) came after clear economic messaging.</p>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2006–2014 — within 40 years from 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-1">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-1">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2848,11 +2848,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-1">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Reinfeldt won re-election with "arbetslinjen" despite similar welfare-state opposition criticism. Key was economic credibility. Kristersson's path mirrors this — but without S's vote at HD01FiU48, the cross-party validation is harder.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: SCB statistics + Riksdag historical records</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage">Parallel 3: 2021 Löfven Government Crisis — Support-Party Leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage">Parallel 3: 2021 Löfven Government Crisis — Support-Party Leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h4>
 <p>PM Stefan Löfven lost a vote of no confidence in June 2021 when SD + right-wing parties voted against the government. Löfven initially chose dissolution election, then resigned — Magdalena Andersson became PM. Lesson: support-party leverage can destabilise a minority government.</p>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2021 — within 40 years from 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-2">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-2">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2887,12 +2887,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-2">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: SD demonstrated in 2021 that it would use formal parliamentary mechanisms. HD10429 interpellation is a lower-severity version of the same leverage play.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Riksdag records, konstitutionsutskottet proceedings (public records)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Delivery-risk assessment per major legislation
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register">Key Legislation Delivery Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register">Key Legislation Delivery Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2964,7 +2964,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register">Key Legislation Delivery Risk
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Type</th><th>Status</th><th>Implementation deadline</th><th>Delivery risk</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Energy relief</td><td>ENACTED April 22</td><td>May 1, 2026</td><td>LOW</td><td>Tax authority (Skatteverket) implementation straightforward</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Criminal deportation</td><td>ENACTED (date TBC)</td><td>June 2026</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>ECHR challenge risk; Migrationsverket capacity</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>NATO deployment</td><td>Pending June 4 vote</td><td>2026–2027</td><td>LOW</td><td>Cross-party support; military logistics pre-planned</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity market</td><td>Committee stage</td><td>Late 2026</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU directive compliance required; grid operator coordination</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Energy taxation</td><td>Committee stage</td><td>2027</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Multi-year implementation; industry consultation</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional amendment (media)</td><td>Vilande — post-election</td><td>2027</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Requires re-approval after September election</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU18</td><td>Social insurance reform</td><td>Government bill</td><td>2027</td><td>HIGH</td><td>39 opposition reservations signal revision risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix">Delivery Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix">Delivery Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Implementation Feasibility vs. Political Priority
@@ -2981,27 +2981,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix">Delivery Feasibility Matrix<a class="" a
     HD01KU32 constitutional: [0.70, 0.25]
     HD01SfU18 social insurance: [0.75, 0.30]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical Path Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation">1. May 1 — FiU48 tax relief activation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical Path Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation">1. May 1 — FiU48 tax relief activation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Owner</strong>: Skatteverket + Energimyndigheten
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Very low — administrative mechanism exists
 <strong>Monitoring indicator</strong>: Petrol station price data week of May 5</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote">2. June 4 — UFöU3 Chamber vote<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote">2. June 4 — UFöU3 Chamber vote<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Owner</strong>: Riksdag + Försvarsdepartementet
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Low — cross-party support confirmed
 <strong>Monitoring indicator</strong>: Final vote margin > 200</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation">3. Q3 2026 — SfU18 social insurance implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation">3. Q3 2026 — SfU18 social insurance implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Owner</strong>: Försäkringskassan
 <strong>Risk</strong>: HIGH — 39 reservations suggest political pressure to revise
 <strong>Monitoring indicator</strong>: Government announcement of implementation date before/after election</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — minimum 3 competing hypotheses
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypotheses">Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypotheses">Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypotheses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3029,7 +3029,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypotheses">Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Prior probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1</td><td>Government's April legislative package is a genuine pre-election fiscal consolidation</td><td>45%</td></tr><tr><td>H2</td><td>S's FiU48 vote was a strategic error that will backfire by blunting opposition energy narrative</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>H3</td><td>SD-M fracture (HD10429) is a deliberate SD voter-mobilization signal, not a real coalition threat</td><td>25%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix">Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix">Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3090,7 +3090,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix">Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix<a class
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence item</th><th>H1</th><th>H2</th><th>H3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 passed with S+KD support</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 spring economic bill passes</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>77 committee reservations by opposition</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>SD's HD10429 challenges M on demonstrations</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>SoU17 R15: KD-SD fracture on healthcare</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Inconsistent</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442: S's 5 interpellations vs. Svantesson</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank: stable GDP 0.82%</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO deployment broad support</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral">Hypothesis scores (+ = supports, - = contradicts, 0 = neutral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral">Hypothesis scores (+ = supports, - = contradicts, 0 = neutral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3118,7 +3118,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral">Hypothesis sc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Score</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1 Fiscal consolidation genuine</td><td>+3 / -1 = <strong>net +2</strong></td><td>Supported — primary hypothesis stands</td></tr><tr><td>H2 S FiU48 vote strategic error</td><td>+2 / -1 = <strong>net +1</strong></td><td>Weakly supported — uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>H3 SD fracture is deliberate signal</td><td>+1 / -1 = <strong>net 0</strong></td><td>Not supported — may be real fracture</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation">Counter-argument 1: H1 Challenge — "Fiscal Package is Pre-Election Spending, Not Consolidation"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation">Counter-argument 1: H1 Challenge — "Fiscal Package is Pre-Election Spending, Not Consolidation"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: HD03100 + HD01FiU48 represent electoral give-aways, not genuine fiscal management. The government is spending its fiscal space before September 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for this challenge</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3134,7 +3134,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spend
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net verdict</strong>: H1 stands with caveats — fiscal package is partially electoral, partially consolidation. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise">Counter-argument 2: H2 Challenge — "S's FiU48 Vote Was Actually Strategically Wise"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise">Counter-argument 2: H2 Challenge — "S's FiU48 Vote Was Actually Strategically Wise"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: S's vote for HD01FiU48 is rational — it shows S as responsible, not reflexively oppositional. Voters trust a party that can vote for useful measures.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for this challenge</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3150,7 +3150,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategic
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net verdict</strong>: H2 weakly supported — risk for S remains if MP coalition partner is alienated. [B3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater">Counter-argument 3: H3 Refinement — "SD-M Fracture Is Real, Not Just Theater"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater">Counter-argument 3: H3 Refinement — "SD-M Fracture Is Real, Not Just Theater"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: SD's HD10429 interpellation represents a genuine policy dispute (demonstration rights) where SD believes the Prop. 133 restriction goes too far — exposing SD's civil-libertarian streak.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for this challenge</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3166,13 +3166,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-thea
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net verdict</strong>: H3 partially revised — 60% deliberate signal + 40% genuine policy dispute. [B2]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 7-dimension political classification
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment">Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment">Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3221,7 +3221,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment">Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Ideological alignment</th><th>Party</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03235 (criminal deportation)</td><td>Far-right enforcement</td><td>SD/M</td><td>Tidöavtalet delivery</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236 (fuel tax relief)</td><td>Centre-right populist</td><td>M/SD/KD/L</td><td>Cross-coalition; S also voted yes</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 (NATO Finland)</td><td>Cross-spectrum national security</td><td>All parties except historic opposition</td><td>Sweden's NATO post-accession commitment</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (electricity laws)</td><td>Centre-right + market liberal</td><td>M/KD/L/C</td><td>EU compliance-driven</td></tr><tr><td>SfU18 (social insurance)</td><td>Centre-left opposition</td><td>S/V/MP/C</td><td>39 reservations against government</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 (Ukraine tribunal)</td><td>Liberal international order</td><td>Broad coalition</td><td>Human rights, rule of law</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-2-policy-domain">Dimension 2: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-policy-domain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-2-policy-domain">Dimension 2: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-policy-domain"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3268,7 +3268,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-2-policy-domain">Dimension 2: Policy Domain<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Key documents</th><th>Priority tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Tier 1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>Defence/Security</td><td>UFöU3, HD03214, HD03228</td><td>Tier 1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>Energy/Climate</td><td>HD03240, HD03238, HD03239, HD03242</td><td>Tier 2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare/Social</td><td>SfU18, SoU16, SoU17, HD03216, HD03245</td><td>Tier 2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal Justice</td><td>HD03235, HD03237, HD03246</td><td>Tier 2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Affairs</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>Tier 3 — Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Digital/Infrastructure</td><td>HD01TU21, HD01TU17</td><td>Tier 3 — Medium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026">Dimension 3: Political Salience (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026">Dimension 3: Political Salience (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3310,7 +3310,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026">Dimension 3: Political
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Electoral salience</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Household energy relief directly before election</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Government economic narrative</td></tr><tr><td>SfU18+SoU16+17</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Opposition's primary attack vector</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>HIGH</td><td>SD flagship + ECHR risk</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Cross-party consensus, not divisive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Technical but structurally important</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity">Dimension 4: Constitutional Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity">Dimension 4: Constitutional Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3342,7 +3342,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity">Dimension 4: Constitutional S
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Constitutional sensitivity</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU32 (media accessibility)</td><td>HIGH — constitutional amendment</td><td>Vilande; requires re-approval after election</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33 (search/seizure digital)</td><td>HIGH — constitutional amendment</td><td>Vilande; same process</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>HIGH</td><td>ECHR proportionality challenge</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Demonstration rights (fundamental freedom)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-5-international-dimension">Dimension 5: International Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-international-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-5-international-dimension">Dimension 5: International Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-international-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3384,7 +3384,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-5-international-dimension">Dimension 5: International Dimen
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>International dimension</th><th>Treaty/agreement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>HIGH</td><td>NATO Article 5; bilateral Finland agreement</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Arms export/SIPRI/EU regulation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>HIGH</td><td>International Criminal Court cooperation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>HIGH</td><td>UN reparations principles</td></tr><tr><td>HD03214</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU NIS2 directive implementation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU electricity market directive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline">Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline">Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3421,7 +3421,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline">Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Deadline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>Enacted April 22 — immediate effect May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Decision June 4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Pre-election constitutional requirement</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Enactment summer 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Implementation autumn 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR Art. 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR Art. 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3454,7 +3454,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9">Dimension 7: Data Classif
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Data type</th><th>Legal basis</th><th>Risk level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Voting records (named MPs)</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Party affiliations</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Political opinions (analysis)</td><td>Art. 9(2)(g) substantial public interest</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Individual MPs' statements</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-summary">Priority Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-summary">Priority Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 pie title Document Distribution by Priority Tier
     "Tier 1 — Critical" : 5
@@ -3462,12 +3462,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tier-summary">Priority Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "Tier 3 — Medium" : 7
     "Tier 4 — Background" : 3</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Tier-C Aggregation Cross-Reference (ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1">Sibling Analysis Folder References (Tier-C Gate Check 1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1">Sibling Analysis Folder References (Tier-C Gate Check 1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This monthly review synthesises all single-type analyses from the period March 24–April 23, 2026:</p>
 
 
@@ -3567,7 +3567,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1">Sibling Analy
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Date</th><th>Type</th><th>Lead story</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/propositions/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Propositions</td><td>Spring fiscal package initial batch</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>Defence + transport committee</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/interpellations/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Interpellations</td><td>Social policy interpellations</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/motions/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Motions</td><td>Budget counter-motions</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-02/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-02</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>SoU committee reports</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/propositions/</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Propositions</td><td>HD03100 spring economic bill</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>FiU48 energy + SfU18 social</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/evening-analysis/</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Evening Analysis</td><td>Comprehensive April 14 digest</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-15/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>Additional committee reports</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/</td><td>2026-04-19</td><td>Monthly Review</td><td>Prior monthly review (Mar 20–Apr 19)</td><td>INGESTED — BASE</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/</td><td>2026-04-21</td><td>Evening Analysis</td><td>Pre-enactment FiU48 analysis</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Evening Analysis</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; SD-M fracture confirmed</td><td>INGESTED — MOST RECENT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-table">Document Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-table">Document Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3659,7 +3659,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-table">Document Cross-Reference Table<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Referenced in</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Proposition</td><td>significance-scoring, executive-brief, synthesis-summary</td><td>Lead fiscal story</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Proposition</td><td>significance-scoring, risk-assessment</td><td>Spring fiscal package</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>synthesis-summary, executive-brief, risk-assessment, threat-analysis</td><td>Most politically significant — enacted April 22</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>significance-scoring, threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>NATO deployment Finland</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Proposition</td><td>threat-analysis, risk-assessment, classification-results</td><td>Criminal deportation — ECHR risk</td></tr><tr><td>SfU18</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives, classification-results</td><td>39 opposition reservations</td></tr><tr><td>SoU16</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>20 opposition reservations</td></tr><tr><td>SoU17</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives, classification-results</td><td>KD-SD healthcare fracture</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives, threat-analysis, synthesis-summary</td><td>SD challenges M (demonstrations)</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives, threat-analysis, significance-scoring</td><td>S accountability offensive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Proposition</td><td>classification-results, implementation-feasibility</td><td>Electricity market</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Proposition</td><td>classification-results, stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>Ukraine tribunal</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>KU report</td><td>classification-results</td><td>Constitutional amendment — vilande</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19">Thematic Continuity — Prior Monthly Review (Apr 19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19">Thematic Continuity — Prior Monthly Review (Apr 19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3692,11 +3692,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19">Thematic Continuity
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR from Apr 19 monthly-review</th><th>April 23 status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-2: Spring budget outcome — will FiU48 pass?</td><td><strong>RESOLVED</strong> — Yes, passed April 22 with M+SD+S+KD</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3: SD-KD healthcare fracture — how far?</td><td><strong>ONGOING</strong> — SoU17 R15 confirms KD-SD fracture; not yet escalated to government crisis</td><td>SoU17 reservation R15</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4: NATO deployment confirmation</td><td><strong>CONFIRMED</strong> — UFöU3 before Chamber for decision June 4</td><td>UFöU3 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7: Energy reform pace</td><td><strong>PROGRESSING</strong> — HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239 in committee</td><td>Energy committee bills</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ICD 203 audit + SAT catalog + osint-tradecraft-standards.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3754,7 +3754,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 Standard</th><th>Applied?</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Proper sourcing</td><td>✅</td><td>All claims cite dok_id, riksdagen.se URLs, or named primary sources</td></tr><tr><td>2. Uncertainty expression (WEP)</td><td>✅</td><td>"Highly likely", "Likely", "Unlikely", "Almost certain" used throughout</td></tr><tr><td>3. Appropriate confidence</td><td>✅</td><td>Admiralty codes [A1]–[C3] applied per evidence quality</td></tr><tr><td>4. Alternative hypotheses</td><td>✅</td><td>devils-advocate.md: 3 competing hypotheses with ACH matrix</td></tr><tr><td>5. Distinguish fact from judgment</td><td>✅</td><td>Factual claims (enacted, vote count) separated from analytical judgments</td></tr><tr><td>6. Identify information gaps</td><td>✅</td><td>Gap: ECHR timeline on HD03235; Gap: SD's internal coalition strategy</td></tr><tr><td>7. Analytic tradecraft</td><td>✅</td><td>F3EAD model applied; attack tree; coalition mathematics</td></tr><tr><td>8. Avoid mirror imaging</td><td>✅</td><td>Considered SD's genuine policy dispute interpretation (H3 refinement)</td></tr><tr><td>9. Consistent with available data</td><td>✅</td><td>World Bank economic data, MCP download confirmed before analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3840,18 +3840,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>SAT Technique</th><th>Applied in</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td><td>3 hypotheses, 8 evidence items</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Devil's Advocacy</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td><td>Counter-arguments for all 3 hypotheses</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>Full SWOT + TOWS matrix</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>4 scenarios summing to 100%</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Red Team Analysis</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>Attack tree + TTP mapping</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>PESTLE Analysis</td><td>classification-results.md + comparative-international.md</td><td>Political, Economic, Social, Technical, Legal dimensions</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Stakeholder Analysis</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>6-lens matrix</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Historical Analogies</td><td>historical-parallels.md</td><td>≥2 named precedents</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Coalition Mathematics</td><td>coalition-mathematics.md</td><td>Seat-count table with vote distributions</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Forward Indicators / Signposts</td><td>forward-indicators.md</td><td>≥10 dated indicators across 4 horizons</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md §KJ</td><td>Checked: SD fracture, ECHR timeline, S polling</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Confidence Calibration</td><td>All assessments</td><td>Admiralty [A1]–[C3] per evidence base</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs">Methodology Improvements for Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation">Improvement 1: Early MCP Data Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs">Methodology Improvements for Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation">Improvement 1: Early MCP Data Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue observed</strong>: Data download relied on meta-summaries from sibling folders; direct MCP queries for April 20–23 documents were not comprehensively executed.
 <strong>Improvement</strong>: Future monthly-review runs should explicitly query <code>search_dokument</code> with <code>from_date: "$PERIOD_END - 7 days"</code> to ensure the most recent period (which most prior runs have not covered) is fully downloaded.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking">Improvement 2: Automated PIR Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking">Improvement 2: Automated PIR Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue observed</strong>: Prior-cycle PIR resolution required manual reading of April 19 monthly-review <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>. This is error-prone and time-consuming.
 <strong>Improvement</strong>: Implement a <code>pir-tracking.md</code> artifact in each monthly-review folder that is machine-readable. Each run should parse the prior cycle's file and auto-populate the "Carried-forward PIRs" table.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation">Improvement 3: Coalition Mathematics Automation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation">Improvement 3: Coalition Mathematics Automation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue observed</strong>: Seat counts for Mermaid diagrams required manual tallying against 349-seat Riksdag.
 <strong>Improvement</strong>: Create a <code>scripts/coalition-calculator.ts</code> script that accepts a list of parties and their current seat counts (from riksdag-regering MCP ledamöter statistics) and outputs both a seat-count table and Mermaid gantt chart. This would be reusable across all monthly, weekly, and election workflows.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-information-gaps-identified">Information Gaps Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps-identified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-gaps-identified">Information Gaps Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps-identified"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3889,7 +3889,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-gaps-identified">Information Gaps Identified<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gap</th><th>Impact</th><th>PIR?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ECHR filing status for HD03235</td><td>HIGH — if filed, changes risk assessment</td><td>PIR-4</td></tr><tr><td>SD's internal coalition strategy document</td><td>HIGH — separates theater from real fracture</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Autumn budget healthcare allocation</td><td>MEDIUM — determines KD fracture escalation</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td>S's September election target seat count</td><td>MEDIUM — determines interpellation strategy</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>MP polling impact from FiU48 energy vote</td><td>LOW — cross-coalition energy cooperation may affect Green vote</td><td>No</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-standards-met">Tradecraft Standards Met<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-standards-met"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-standards-met">Tradecraft Standards Met<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-standards-met"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Offentlighetsprincipen</strong>: All sources public — riksdagen.se, regeringen.se, World Bank open data</li>
 <li><strong>GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)</strong>: Political opinions referenced only where publicly made by MPs in official capacity</li>
@@ -3897,7 +3897,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tradecraft-standards-met">Tradecraft Standards Met<a class="" aria-hi
 <li><strong>Data minimisation</strong>: No private contact information, personal health data, or non-public communications referenced</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-monthly-review
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24810587515
 <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23T00:58:00Z
@@ -3907,7 +3907,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>MCP servers</strong>: riksdag-regering [LIVE], scb [N/A], world-bank [LIVE]
 <strong>Analysis mode</strong>: Run 1 — Analysis only</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses Ingested (Tier-C cross-type synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses Ingested (Tier-C cross-type synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3999,7 +3999,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference An
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Subfolder</th><th>Synthesis Summary</th><th>Key PIRs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>propositions</td><td>Pre-election security/defence/immigration batch</td><td>Security legislation, Tidö delivery</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>Healthcare/social insurance battleground</td><td>SD-KD healthcare dissent</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>interpellations</td><td>S-dominated infrastructure accountability</td><td>Carlson (KD) targeting</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>motions</td><td>Education, housing, welfare themes</td><td>MP/V/S policy positions</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-02</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>Defence/security/healthcare reports</td><td>NATO, FöU12, SoU reforms</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td>propositions</td><td>Spring fiscal package (Prop. 100/99/236)</td><td>Pre-election fiscal framing</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>FiU48 emergency budget, UFöU3 NATO Finland</td><td>Election-year fiscal/defence</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td>evening-analysis</td><td>8-proposition legislative blitz</td><td>Energy triptych, police</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-15</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>Transport Committee digital/cyber/port reforms</td><td>TU21 e-ID, TU17 anti-fraud</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-19</td><td>monthly-review</td><td>March 20–April 19 review</td><td>Spring budget PIRs</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-21</td><td>evening-analysis</td><td>Fuel tax election gamble, constitutional hearings</td><td>FiU48 pre-decision</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>evening-analysis</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted, M+SD+S+KD supermajority</td><td>Post-vote dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>propositions</td><td>Vårproposition 2026, energy laws</td><td>Svantesson fiscal narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-documents-primary-sources">Key Documents (Primary Sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-primary-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-documents-primary-sources">Key Documents (Primary Sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-primary-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4232,7 +4232,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-documents-primary-sources">Key Documents (Primary Sources)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Date</th><th>Committee</th><th>Full-text</th><th>Source URL</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026 (Prop. 2025/26:100)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026 (Prop. 2025/26:99)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD0399.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD0399.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra Ändringsbudget — bränsle/el/gas (Prop. 2025/26:236)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03236.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03236.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Betänkande FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget beslut</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet (Prop. 2025/26:240)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>TU/NU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny miljöprövningsmyndighet (Prop. 2025/26:238)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>MJU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03238.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03238.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner (Prop. 2025/26:239)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>NU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03239.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03239.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernt regelverk för krigsmateriel (Prop. 2024/25:228)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>UU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03228.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03228.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03214</td><td>Stärkt nationellt cybersäkerhetscenter (Prop. 2025/26:214)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>FöU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03214.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03214.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SfU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning (Prop. 2025/26:237)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>JuU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03237.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03237.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt och hållbart skogsbruk (Prop. 2025/26:242)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>MJU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03242.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03242.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraina aggressionstribunal (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>UU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraina skadeståndskommission (Prop. 2025/26:232)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>UU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>NATO Finland deployment (UFöU3)</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>UFöU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UF%C3%B6U3.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UFöU3.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU18</td><td>SfU18 — Sjukförsäkring (39 reservations)</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SfU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU16</td><td>SoU16 — Hälso- och sjukvård (20 reservations)</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU16.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU16.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU17</td><td>SoU17 — SD-KD coalition fracture</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>TU21 — Statlig e-legitimation</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>TU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU21.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU21.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU17</td><td>TU17 — Åtgärder mot telekombedrägeri</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>TU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU17.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>IP: SD vs Strömmer (M) — demonstrationsrätt</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>JuU</td><td>metadata-only</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>IP: S vs Svantesson (M) — ätstörningsvård</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>SoU</td><td>metadata-only</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03216</td><td>Stärkt medicinsk kompetens kommunal vård (Prop. 2025/26:216)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03216.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03216.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Nationell strategi mot våld mot kvinnor (Skr. 2025/26:245)</td><td>Skrivelse</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03245.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03245.html</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-data-sources">Economic Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-data-sources">Economic Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4282,11 +4282,44 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-data-sources">Economic Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th><th>Year</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>GDP Growth (SE)</td><td>0.82%</td><td>2024</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>GDP Growth (SE)</td><td>-0.20%</td><td>2023</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Unemployment (SE)</td><td>8.69%</td><td>2025</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Unemployment (SE)</td><td>8.40%</td><td>2024</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Inflation CPI (SE)</td><td>2.84%</td><td>2024</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Inflation CPI (SE)</td><td>8.55%</td><td>2023</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering: LIVE — all tools responsive, <code>get_sync_status</code> confirmed at 2026-04-23T00:55:40Z</li>
 <li>world-bank: LIVE — economic data retrieved successfully</li>
 <li>scb: Not queried (monthly review uses cross-type synthesis from sibling analysis)</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UF%C3%B6U3-analysis.md"><code>documents/UFöU3-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4340,7 +4373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:10.321Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:31.832Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html b/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html
index e2fac19f2a..ae2cfa030a 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Monthly Review April 2026">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.550Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.033Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.550Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.033Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monthly Review April 2026","description":"Sweden's April 2026 parliamentary sprint delivered the Kristersson government's final pre-election legislative package. The month's political signature is a fiscal-electoral pivot: HD01FiU48 (4.1…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:10.550Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UFöU3-analysis.md","name":"documents/UFöU3-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Monthly Review April 2026","description":"Sweden's April 2026 parliamentary sprint delivered the Kristersson government's final pre-election legislative package. The month's political signature is a fiscal-electoral pivot: HD01FiU48 (4.1…","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:32.033Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-monthly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03235-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10429-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10442-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UFöU3-analysis.md","name":"documents/UFöU3-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/economic-data.json","name":"economic-data.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,25 +216,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] | <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~143</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's April 2026 parliamentary sprint delivered the Kristersson government's final pre-election legislative package. The month's political signature is a <strong>fiscal-electoral pivot</strong>: HD01FiU48 (4.1 billion SEK fuel tax emergency relief) passed April 22 with an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD supermajority, revealing S's inability to oppose household energy relief 143 days before the September 2026 election. Combined with NATO deployments (UFöU3), energy governance restructuring (HD03240/238/239), and a criminal justice sweep, the government has executed a high-confidence electoral positioning strategy — though healthcare (77 combined reservations across SfU18/SoU16/SoU17) and coalition stress (SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15) present credible vulnerabilities.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026">Decision 1: Electoral Strategy Assessment (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026">Decision 1: Electoral Strategy Assessment (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-electoral-strategy-assessment-september-2026"></a></h4>
 <p>The government's pre-election positioning is coherent and professionally executed — fiscal responsibility + household relief + security + immigration delivery. The main risk is the healthcare battleground, where 77 combined committee reservations signal a well-organized opposition offensive.
 <strong>Analyst Recommendation</strong>: Monitor SfU committee deliberations and healthcare regional data for S campaign ammunition. Watch SD-KD healthcare split for escalation signals.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing">Decision 2: Energy Policy and Investment Timing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing">Decision 2: Energy Policy and Investment Timing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-energy-policy-and-investment-timing"></a></h4>
 <p>The energy triptych (HD03240/238/239) creates new investment opportunities and regulatory clarity for electricity infrastructure. Miljöprövningsmyndigheten will accelerate permitting. Wind power municipal revenue sharing (HD03239) resolves a key local opposition barrier.
 <strong>Analyst Recommendation</strong>: Investors in Swedish electricity production and renewable energy should note the regulatory framework stabilization as a positive signal.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact">Decision 3: Defence and Security Business Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact">Decision 3: Defence and Security Business Impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-defence-and-security-business-impact"></a></h4>
 <p>UFöU3 (1,200 troops eFP Finland) + HD03214 (cybersecurity) + HD03228 (war materiel) signal continued high defence spending. Sweden's defence industrial base is being modernized through cleaner war materiel regulations.
 <strong>Analyst Recommendation</strong>: Defence and cybersecurity sector companies should note accelerated procurement and regulatory modernization signals.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read-key-bullets">60-Second Read: Key Bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-key-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read-key-bullets">60-Second Read: Key Bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read-key-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 22</strong>: HD01FiU48 (4.1 GSEK fuel tax relief) enacted — M+SD+<strong>S</strong>+KD supermajority signals S's electoral vulnerability on energy costs</li>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 13</strong>: Vårproposition (HD03100) + Vårändringsbudget (HD0399) — final pre-election fiscal framework</li>
@@ -246,11 +246,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read-key-bullets">60-Second Read: Key Bullets<a class="" ar
 <li>🟢 <strong>Cross-party</strong>: Defence and NATO measures pass with cross-party consensus — government strength</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">⚡ Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">⚡ Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Monitor</strong>: FiU48's post-adoption public opinion tracking — if household energy cost relief translates to M/KD/L polling gains, S's dual-track "symbolic opposition + practical support" strategy has failed. If S maintains or gains polling share despite April 22 vote, their message discipline is effective.
 <strong>Trigger date</strong>: First post-April 22 opinion polls (expected late April/early May 2026).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence-distribution">📊 Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">📊 Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--confidence-distribution">📊 Confidence Distribution<a class="" ari
     "MEDIUM [B3]" : 15
     "LOW [C4]" : 5</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--full-analysis-references">🔗 Full Analysis References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--full-analysis-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-full-analysis-references">🔗 Full Analysis References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-full-analysis-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md">Synthesis Summary</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md">Significance Scoring</a></li>
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--full-analysis-references">🔗 Full Analysis References<a class="" a
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md">Forward Indicators</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analysis Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: DIW weighting per synthesis-methodology.md; Tier-C 1.5× period multiplier
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <strong>Overall Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]
 <strong>Days to Election 2026</strong>: ~143 (September 13, 2026)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--lead-story-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PRIMARY: The Spring 2026 Electoral Pivot — Government's Pre-Election Legislative Blitz and Fiscal Gamble</strong></p>
 <p>The 30-day period March 24 – April 23, 2026 constitutes the most consequential parliamentary month of the 2025/26 riksmöte. The Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) delivered its final comprehensive legislative package before the September 2026 election: a spring fiscal triple-pack (HD03100 + HD0399 + HD03236), an energy transformation triptych (HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239), a security and defence cluster (HD03214 + HD03228 + UFöU3), and a criminal justice overhaul. The political climax arrived April 22 when HD01FiU48 (the fuel tax emergency budget) passed with an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD supermajority — revealing the limits of S's climate positioning when household energy costs dominate the political agenda 143 days before election day.</p>
 <p><strong>SECONDARY: Healthcare as the Defining Domestic Battleground</strong></p>
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--lead-story-decision">🎯 Lead Story Decision<a class="" aria-hidden
 <p><strong>TERTIARY: NATO Finland Deployment — Sweden's Post-Membership Defence Trajectory</strong></p>
 <p>UFöU3 authorizing 1,200 troops for NATO enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) in Finland through December 2026 is the period's most consequential foreign/security decision. Combined with HD03214 (cybersecurity), HD03228 (war materiel), and HD03214 (cybersecurity center), Sweden's post-NATO accession legislative framework is now substantially in place.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence Dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0', 'primaryBorderColor': '#00d9ff', 'lineColor': '#ff006e', 'secondaryColor': '#0a0e27', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     A["🔴 TIER 1 — DIW 9.5&#x3C;br/>HD01FiU48: 4.1 GSEK Budget ENACTED&#x3C;br/>M+SD+S+KD supermajority | April 22&#x3C;br/>Confidence: HIGH [A1]"]
@@ -347,19 +347,19 @@ <h2 id="rm--diw-weighted-intelligence-dashboard">📊 DIW-Weighted Intelligence
     style G fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#000000
     style H fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#000000</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1">Theme 1: The Electoral Fiscal Gamble [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1">Theme 1: The Electoral Fiscal Gamble [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-1-the-electoral-fiscal-gamble-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The government's spring budget package is its last major fiscal statement before voters. Three interconnected propositions — the Vårproposition (HD03100/Prop. 2025/26:100), Vårändringsbudget (HD0399/Prop. 2025/26:99), and the Extra Ändringsbudget cutting fuel taxes (HD03236/Prop. 2025/26:236) — represent a carefully calibrated pre-election offer. The April 22 adoption of HD01FiU48 by an extraordinary M+SD+S+KD majority demonstrates that S was unwilling to be seen as blocking household energy relief, even at the cost of strategic consistency on climate. Finance Minister Svantesson (M) has positioned the Tidö government as fiscally responsible defenders of household purchasing power.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1">Theme 2: Energy Transition — Triptych Reform [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1">Theme 2: Energy Transition — Triptych Reform [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-2-energy-transition--triptych-reform-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Three propositions tabled April 14 — HD03240 (new electricity system laws), HD03238 (new environmental permitting authority Miljöprövningsmyndigheten), and HD03239 (wind power municipal revenue reform) — represent the most comprehensive restructuring of Sweden's energy governance framework in a decade. The creation of Miljöprövningsmyndigheten is particularly significant: it explicitly accelerates permitting for electricity production infrastructure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1">Theme 3: Security and Defence Legislative Framework [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1">Theme 3: Security and Defence Legislative Framework [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-3-security-and-defence-legislative-framework-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's NATO membership has generated a substantial legislative agenda. UFöU3 (1,200 troops eFP Finland), HD03214 (cybersecurity center), and HD03228 (war materiel modernization) represent the core legislative architecture of post-NATO Sweden. The cross-party consensus on defence is structurally important — it isolates SD's occasional dissent on social policy and positions security as a government strength heading into the election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1">Theme 4: Healthcare and Social Insurance Battleground [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1">Theme 4: Healthcare and Social Insurance Battleground [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-4-healthcare-and-social-insurance-battleground-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>With 77 total reservations across SfU18 + SoU16 + SoU17, healthcare and social insurance are the opposition's primary vulnerability-targeting domain. The SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15 is the most analytically significant coalition signal of the month — representing a substantive policy disagreement between the government's two most conservative support pillars. This will be amplified during the election campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1">Theme 5: Immigration Enforcement Acceleration [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1">Theme 5: Immigration Enforcement Acceleration [HIGH confidence — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-theme-5-immigration-enforcement-acceleration-high-confidence--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Three immigration measures (HD03235 criminal deportation, new reception act, settlement act) represent the Tidö coalition's most ideologically SD-driven deliverables. HD03235 carries the highest ECHR risk (L×I score 15/25) but is also the most electorally potent for SD.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <p><strong>Methodology</strong>: F3EAD (Find-Fix-Finish-Exploit-Analyze-Disseminate) applied across all 5 themes. SAT techniques: SWOT, Scenario Analysis, ACH, Red Team, Coalition Mathematics, Historical Parallels.</p>
 <p><strong>Uncertainty flags</strong>: Electoral projections ([B2]) rely on current seat data without live polling. ECHR timeline ([C3]) is speculative. Post-election formation ([C4]) has low confidence.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Recommended Title (EN)</strong>: "Sweden's April 2026 Parliamentary Sprint: How the Kristersson Government Positioned Itself for September's Election"</li>
 <li><strong>Recommended Title (SV)</strong>: "Sveriges riksdag april 2026: Hur Kristerssonregeringen positionerade sig inför septembervalet"</li>
@@ -431,32 +431,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>Meta Description (SV)</strong>: "Månadsöversikt: 30 dagars riksdagspolitik — bränsleskattelättnader, NATO-insatser, energireform och sjukvårdsstriden inför valet 2026."</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ICD 203 Key Judgments + Admiralty Code + WEP Kent Scale
 <strong>Period</strong>: March 24 – April 23, 2026
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] — PRIMARY JUDGMENT</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1">KJ-1: HD01FiU48 Enactment Strengthens Government's Pre-Election Positioning [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1">KJ-1: HD01FiU48 Enactment Strengthens Government's Pre-Election Positioning [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1-hd01fiu48-enactment-strengthens-governments-pre-election-positioning-high--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The Kristersson government enacted HD01FiU48 on April 22 with M+SD+S+KD majority support, delivering 82 öre/litre fuel tax relief effective May 2026. This represents the government's most significant pre-election economic win. S's tactical affirmative vote further validates the measure's cross-spectrum appeal and may blunt opposition criticism on household living costs.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [A1] — multiple primary sources confirming enactment; World Bank economic data supports stable macro baseline; cross-party vote is verifiable parliamentary record.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Highly likely</strong> the fuel relief will be a positive electoral factor for the governing coalition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2">KJ-2: 77 Committee Reservations Represent the Opposition's Primary Electoral Weapon [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2">KJ-2: 77 Committee Reservations Represent the Opposition's Primary Electoral Weapon [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2-77-committee-reservations-represent-the-oppositions-primary-electoral-weapon-high--a2"></a></h4>
 <p>The aggregated 77 committee reservations across SfU18 (39), SoU16 (20), and SoU17 (18) constitute the largest coordinated opposition documentation campaign in the 2024/25 riksmöte. Combined with S's Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) and SD's challenges to M (HD10429), the opposition's welfare-state narrative is fully operationalised.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [A2] — official parliamentary documents; committee reservation counts are verifiable from riksdagen.se.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Likely</strong> the welfare narrative will remain the opposition's primary attack vector through September 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2">KJ-3: SD-M Demonstrations Fracture Does Not Yet Threaten Coalition Survival [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2">KJ-3: SD-M Demonstrations Fracture Does Not Yet Threaten Coalition Survival [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3-sd-m-demonstrations-fracture-does-not-yet-threaten-coalition-survival-medium--b2"></a></h4>
 <p>SD's formal interpellation HD10429 against Justice Minister Strömmer on demonstration rights represents an unprecedented intra-coalition challenge, but does not constitute a vote against the government. SD retains every incentive to maintain coalition support through the September 2026 election. The fracture remains symbolic and tactical.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [B2] — HD10429 confirms the interpellation exists; absence of SD motion or vote signal is inferential.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Unlikely</strong> the SD-M fracture will lead to a government collapse before September 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1">KJ-4: UFöU3 NATO Finland Deployment Establishes Sweden as Credible Alliance Member [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1">KJ-4: UFöU3 NATO Finland Deployment Establishes Sweden as Credible Alliance Member [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4-uföu3-nato-finland-deployment-establishes-sweden-as-credible-alliance-member-high--a1"></a></h4>
 <p>The Foreign Affairs Committee's UFöU3 authorising deployment of 1,200 Swedish troops to NATO's eFP in Finland pending June 4 Chamber vote has broad cross-party support. This represents Sweden's most significant NATO post-accession commitment and cements Sweden's security contribution.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence basis</strong>: [A1] — UFöU3 document confirmed via riksdagen-regering MCP; government position confirmed.
 <strong>WEP expression</strong>: <strong>Almost certain</strong> the June 4 vote will approve UFöU3 given current political alignment.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract">Prior-Cycle PIR Resolution (Tier-C Continuity Contract)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review">Carried-forward PIRs from analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract">Prior-Cycle PIR Resolution (Tier-C Continuity Contract)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-resolution-tier-c-continuity-contract"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review">Carried-forward PIRs from analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-carried-forward-pirs-from-analysisdaily2026-04-19monthly-review">Carr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Prior-cycle PIR</th><th>Status</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Residual PIR?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1: Spring budget outcome — will FiU48 pass?</td><td><strong>CLOSED — Resolved YES</strong></td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted April 22 [A1]</td><td>No — new PIR-1 issued below</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2: SD-KD healthcare fracture depth</td><td><strong>ONGOING — Depth confirmed</strong></td><td>SoU17 R15 KD-SD reservation; not yet government crisis [A2]</td><td>Yes — carries forward as PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3: NATO deployment confirmation</td><td><strong>PROGRESSING — UFöU3 before Chamber</strong></td><td>June 4 decision pending [A1]</td><td>Yes — carries forward as PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4: Energy reform legislative timeline</td><td><strong>PROGRESSING</strong></td><td>HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239 in committee [A2]</td><td>Yes — carries forward as PIR-4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026">Issued PIRs — Carrying Forward to May 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026">Issued PIRs — Carrying Forward to May 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-issued-pirs--carrying-forward-to-may-2026">Issued PIRs — Carrying F
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Question</th><th>Priority</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1</td><td>Will S's healthcare offensive convert to polling lead?</td><td>HIGH</td><td>June 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2</td><td>Will KD-SD healthcare fracture (SoU17 R15) escalate to a vote against government?</td><td>HIGH</td><td>June–September 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3</td><td>Will UFöU3 pass June 4 Chamber vote?</td><td>HIGH</td><td>June 4, 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4</td><td>Will ECHR issue interim measure challenging HD03235?</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>June–December 2026</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5</td><td>Will autumn budget incorporate healthcare increase satisfying KD?</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>September 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--tradecraft-context-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-context-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--tradecraft-context-1">🔄 Tradecraft Context<a class="" aria-hidden
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Analytic product</th><th>SAT used</th><th>ICD 203 standard</th><th>Improvement flag</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1 FiU48</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>Standards 1, 2, 3</td><td>No improvement needed — [A1] confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2 77 reservations</td><td>Indicator analysis</td><td>Standards 1, 3, 5</td><td>Tracking required for election conversion</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3 SD-M fracture</td><td>ACH (H3 — deliberately signal vs. real)</td><td>Standards 4, 8</td><td>Mirror-imaging risk: do not assume SD's stated position is theater</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-4 NATO Finland</td><td>Signposts</td><td>Standards 1, 2</td><td>June 4 vote will confirm or disconfirm</td></tr><tr><td>PIR resolution</td><td>Structured transition</td><td>Standard 6</td><td>Residual PIRs properly carried forward</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>OSINT collection basis</strong>: All evidence derived from offentlighetsprincipen-compliant public sources — riksdagen.se official records, World Bank Open Data, Regeringen.se. No private communications referenced. GDPR Art. 9(2)(e) applies to all named political actors in their official capacity.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution-summary">Confidence Distribution Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution-summary">Confidence Distribution Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 pie title Admiralty Confidence Distribution — April 2026 Assessment
     "A1 — Completely reliable / Confirmed" : 8
@@ -592,13 +592,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution-summary">Confidence Distribution Summary<a cl
     "B3 — Usually reliable / Possibly true" : 2
     "C3 — Fairly reliable / Possibly true" : 2</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Methodology</strong>: DIW weighting (Depth × Impact × Width) — ai-driven-analysis-guide.md v5.0
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-rankings">DIW-Weighted Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-rankings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100">Tier 1 — Critical Significance (DIW 9.0–10.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-rankings">DIW-Weighted Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-rankings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100">Tier 1 — Critical Significance (DIW 9.0–10.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD01FiU48 / HD03236</strong> — Extra Ändringsbudget: Fuel tax relief 4.1 GSEK [A1]</p>
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-1--critical-significance-diw-90100">Tier 1 — Critical Signific
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589">Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW 7.5–8.9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589">Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW 7.5–8.9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589"></a></h4>
 <ol start="3">
 <li>
 <p><strong>UFöU3</strong> — NATO eFP Finland: 1,200 troops authorized [A1]</p>
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-2--high-significance-diw-7589">Tier 2 — High Significance (DIW
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074">Tier 3 — Medium Significance (DIW 6.0–7.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074">Tier 3 — Medium Significance (DIW 6.0–7.4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074"></a></h4>
 <ol start="6">
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03235</strong> — Criminal deportation rules [A1]</p>
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-3--medium-significance-diw-6074">Tier 3 — Medium Significance
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Effect on Rankings</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S uses healthcare as primary election issue</td><td>SfU18+SoU16+17 rise to Tier 1</td><td>HIGH [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR ruling on HD03235</td><td>Criminal deportation rises to Tier 1</td><td>MEDIUM [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy price spike before election</td><td>HD03236/FiU48 remain most salient</td><td>HIGH [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition collapse (SD leaves)</td><td>All legislative outcomes recalibrate</td><td>LOW [C4]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram">Ranking Mermaid Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram">Ranking Mermaid Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Scores — Monthly Review April 2026"
@@ -756,13 +756,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-mermaid-diagram">Ranking Mermaid Diagram<a class="" aria-hidd
     y-axis "DIW Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [9.5, 9.2, 8.5, 8.3, 8.0, 7.5, 7.2, 7.0, 6.8, 6.7]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Per-party framing analysis + narrative control assessment
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-governing-bloc-framing">Governing Bloc Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-bloc-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame">M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Competence Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-bloc-framing">Governing Bloc Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-bloc-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame">M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Competence Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "We manage Sweden's economy responsibly — HD03100 spring bill + HD01FiU48 household relief proves fiscal leadership."
 <strong>Key messages</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
@@ -771,15 +771,15 @@ <h3 id="rm-m-moderaterna--fiscal-competence-frame">M (Moderaterna) — Fiscal Co
 <li>"Crime down — criminal deportation law enacted" (HD03235)</li>
 </ol>
 <p><strong>Framing risk</strong>: S's interpellation series (HD10442) targets Finance Minister Svantesson directly — court ruling potentially contradicting Svantesson's statements. M must counter with factual rebuttal.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) — Order and Identity Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame">SD (Sverigedemokraterna) — Order and Identity Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sd-sverigedemokraterna--order-and-identity-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "SD delivers on immigration and enforcement — HD03235 is SD's biggest win in 2025/26."
 <strong>Contradictory signal</strong>: HD10429 interpellation against M's Strömmer on demonstrations — SD must reconcile "order" frame with civil-liberties dispute.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame">KD — Social-Christian Values Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame">KD — Social-Christian Values Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kd--social-christian-values-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "Family, healthcare, Christian values — SoU17 R15 signals we will not accept healthcare cuts."
 <strong>Framing vulnerability</strong>: KD's SoU17 R15 reservation publicly distances KD from SD on healthcare — useful for KD differentiation but signals coalition fragility to voters.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame">S — Responsible Opposition Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame">S — Responsible Opposition Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "We vote yes when it helps Swedes (FiU48), no when it hurts (SfU18/SoU16/SoU17). We are the responsible alternative."
 <strong>Strategic advantage</strong>: Cross-party FiU48 vote appears "statesmanlike." Simultaneous interpellation offensive (HD10442) maintains critical distance.
 <strong>Key messages</strong>:</p>
@@ -788,17 +788,17 @@ <h3 id="rm-s--responsible-opposition-frame">S — Responsible Opposition Frame<a
 <li>"Finance Minister Svantesson misled the Riksdag" (HD10442 claim)</li>
 <li>"We supported fuel relief because Swedes needed it — not the government"</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-v--progressive-flank-frame">V — Progressive Flank Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--progressive-flank-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v--progressive-flank-frame">V — Progressive Flank Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--progressive-flank-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "S is too centrist — V is the party of real welfare state defence."
 <strong>Risk</strong>: If S moves to centre, V may lose voters who prefer a clear left alternative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-mp--climate-first-frame">MP — Climate First Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--climate-first-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp--climate-first-frame">MP — Climate First Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--climate-first-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "HD024082 fuel counter-motion shows only MP puts climate first."
 <strong>Risk</strong>: FiU48 + S's yes vote signals climate concerns secondary to household costs — MP narrative is weakened.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame">C — Market Liberal Pragmatist Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame">C — Market Liberal Pragmatist Frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--market-liberal-pragmatist-frame"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Core narrative</strong>: "We support energy reform (HD03240 abstained on FiU48) and housing (HC023443) — we are the sensible centre."
 <strong>Strategic opportunity</strong>: C abstained on FiU48 — preserves both coalition and opposition options. C is the true pivot party.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-control-assessment">Narrative Control Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-control-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-control-assessment">Narrative Control Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-control-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Media Narrative Strength by Party (April 2026)"
@@ -807,12 +807,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-control-assessment">Narrative Control Assessment<a class=""
     bar [7, 7, 5, 5, 8, 6, 4, 6]</pre>
 <p><strong>Top finding</strong>: S has the strongest current narrative (8/10) — responsible opposition + accountability offensive. M and SD tied at 7/10. MP weakest at 4/10 following FiU48 cross-party energy passage.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder matrix + influence network
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th>Interest</th><th>Influence</th><th>Stance</th><th>Named actors</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td>Government lead</td><td>Fiscal credibility + security</td><td>10/10</td><td>Delivering pre-election package</td><td>PM Svantesson, Finance Min. E. Svantesson</td><td>HD03100 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</td><td>Governing support</td><td>Immigration enforcement + SD voter satisfaction</td><td>9/10</td><td>Compliant on most issues; fracture on demonstrations (HD10429)</td><td>Jimmie Åkesson, Farivar</td><td>HD10429 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td>Coalition junior</td><td>Social conservatism + healthcare</td><td>7/10</td><td>Delivering on healthcare competence (HD03216) but fracturing on SoU17 R15</td><td>Ebba Busch, Elisabet Lann</td><td>HD01SoU17 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>L (Liberalerna)</td><td>Coalition junior</td><td>Civil liberties + education</td><td>6/10</td><td>Supporting energy package; PM Lotta Edholm co-signed HD03236</td><td>Lotta Edholm, Paulina Brandberg</td><td>HD03245 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>S (Socialdemokraterna)</td><td>Main opposition</td><td>Return to power; healthcare</td><td>9/10</td><td>Coordinated accountability offensive; strategically voted for FiU48 on energy costs</td><td>Håkan Juholt (absent), named: Gunilla Carlsson, Serkan Köse, Marie Olsson</td><td>HD10442, HD01FiU48 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Progressive welfare state</td><td>6/10</td><td>Consistent opposition on immigration, healthcare, civil rights</td><td>Gudrun Nordborg, Nadja Awad</td><td>HC023444, HC023445 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>MP (Miljöpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Climate + civil rights</td><td>5/10</td><td>Filed climate counter-motions (HD024082) on fuel tax; outflanked by S's FiU48 vote</td><td>Märta Stenevi, Jan Riise, Mats Berglund</td><td>HD024082 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>C (Centerpartiet)</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Market liberal + rural</td><td>5/10</td><td>Active on housing (HC023443) and LGBTQI (HD10431); pragmatic on energy</td><td>Alireza Akhondi, Catarina Deremar</td><td>HC023437 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>FöU committee</td><td>Parliamentary oversight</td><td>Defence and security</td><td>7/10</td><td>Advancing NATO/defence legislation with broad consensus</td><td>Committee chair</td><td>UFöU3 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish public</td><td>Electorate</td><td>Household energy costs</td><td>N/A</td><td>Broadly supportive of fuel tax relief based on HD01FiU48 passage</td><td>N/A</td><td>World Bank unemployment data</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 graph TD
     GOV["🏛️ Kristersson Government&#x3C;br/>M + KD + L (+ SD support)"]
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style MP fill:#006400,stroke:#006400,color:#FFFFFF
     style C fill:#009933,stroke:#009933,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026">Winner/Loser Analysis — April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026">Winner/Loser Analysis — April 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1012,12 +1012,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-winnerloser-analysis--april-2026">Winner/Loser Analysis — April 202
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Win/Loss</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Svantesson)</td><td><strong>WIN</strong> — spring fiscal package adopted</td><td>HD03100 + FiU48 enacted [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td><strong>MIXED</strong> — immigration delivered; demonstrations conflict [A2]</td><td>HD03235 vs HD10429</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td><strong>NEUTRAL</strong> — healthcare delivered (HD03216) but coalition fracture visible</td><td>SoU17 R15 [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td><strong>TACTICAL WIN</strong> — FiU48 vote shows pragmatism; accountability offensive maintains pressure</td><td>HD10442 series [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td><strong>LOSS</strong> — outflanked on energy; climate narrative diluted by S's FiU48 vote</td><td>HD024082 vs FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish households</td><td><strong>WIN</strong> — 82 öre/l petrol relief May–September 2026</td><td>HD01FiU48 [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine accountability</td><td><strong>WIN</strong> — HD03231 + HD03232 establish Sweden as serious rule-of-law actor</td><td>riksdagen.se [A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ≥10 dated forward indicators across 4 horizons
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026">Horizon 1: Immediate (April 24 – May 31, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026">Horizon 1: Immediate (April 24 – May 31, 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-1-immediate-april-24--may-31-2026">Horizon 1: Immediate (Apri
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-01</td><td>FiU48 fuel tax relief activates (82 öre/l)</td><td>May 1, 2026</td><td>Petrol prices drop; government takes credit</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>FI-02</td><td>Svantesson responds to HD10442 interpellation series</td><td>April–May 2026</td><td>Response admission vs. denial shapes narrative</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-03</td><td>Strömmer responds to HD10429 SD interpellation</td><td>April–May 2026</td><td>Tone: conciliatory vs. dismissive affects SD cooperation</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-04</td><td>HD03235 criminal deportation first enforcement case</td><td>May 2026</td><td>ECHR interim measure filing triggered?</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026">Horizon 2: Short-term (June – August 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026">Horizon 2: Short-term (June – August 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-2-short-term-june--august-2026">Horizon 2: Short-term (June 
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-05</td><td>UFöU3 NATO Finland Chamber vote</td><td>June 4, 2026</td><td>Margin > 200 seats = broad consensus; &#x3C; 175 = surprise</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>FI-06</td><td>Riksdag summer recess budget communications</td><td>June 2026</td><td>Will government announce autumn budget healthcare allocation?</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-07</td><td>ECHR formal filing on HD03235</td><td>June–August 2026</td><td>ECHR registration confirms SD deportation law is challenged</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-08</td><td>SCB Q1 2026 GDP data release</td><td>May 2026</td><td>If GDP > 1%: government economic narrative strengthens</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-09</td><td>Party leader polls — SD vs. M dynamic</td><td>June 2026</td><td>If SD > 25%: SD demands greater coalition role</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-10</td><td>Energy committee final report on HD03240</td><td>August 2026</td><td>Legislative timeline for autumn confirms energy reform pace</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026">Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026">Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-3-electoral-september-2026">Horizon 3: Electoral (September 2
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-11</td><td>Valmyndigheten advance voting opens</td><td>August 26, 2026</td><td>Turnout patterns indicate which bloc is mobilised</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>FI-12</td><td>September 13 election result</td><td>September 13, 2026</td><td>S+V+MP+C ≥ 175: government change; Governing bloc ≥ 175: re-election</td><td>CRITICAL</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026">Horizon 4: Post-Election (October 2026+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026">Horizon 4: Post-Election (October 2026+)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-4-post-election-october-2026">Horizon 4: Post-Election (Octob
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Expected date</th><th>Watch signal</th><th>Risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FI-13</td><td>Talman (Speaker) initiates government formation</td><td>September 2026</td><td>First exploration round signals majority path</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>FI-14</td><td>HD01KU32 constitutional re-approval vote</td><td>October 2026</td><td>New majority votes on media-accessibility constitutional amendment</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicators-summary">Indicators Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicators-summary">Indicators Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -1197,12 +1197,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicators-summary">Indicators Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     FI-14 KU32 re-approval :2026-10-01, 2026-10-31</pre>
 <p><strong>Total indicators</strong>: 14 across 4 horizons. Threshold requirement met (≥10). [A1]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: F3EAD Exploit→Analyze; Kent Scale probability bands
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH [B1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1246,75 +1246,75 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Name</th><th>Probability</th><th>Kent</th><th>Timeframe</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-1</td><td>Government survives — fiscal wins dominate</td><td>40%</td><td>Roughly even</td><td>Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S-2</td><td>Narrow S-led government after election</td><td>30%</td><td>Unlikely</td><td>Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S-3</td><td>SD achieves major gains; pushes M further right</td><td>20%</td><td>Very unlikely</td><td>Sept 2026</td></tr><tr><td>S-4</td><td>Coalition collapse before election</td><td>10%</td><td>Remote</td><td>June–Aug 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total: 100%</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40">S-1: Government Survives — Fiscal Wins Dominate (40%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40">S-1: Government Survives — Fiscal Wins Dominate (40%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1-government-survives--fiscal-wins-dominate-40"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p>The Kristersson government capitalizes on HD01FiU48 household fuel relief, HD03100 spring economic bill, and NATO-deployment achievement (UFöU3). Unemployment declining, inflation contained at 2.84% — economic management narrative holds. SD and KD demonstrations-healthcare fractures remain verbal, not structural. Election: M+SD+KD+L return with slim majority (≥175 seats).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01FiU48 enacted April 22 — cross-party support (M+SD+S+KD) signals economic competence [A1]</li>
 <li>World Bank: GDP growth 0.82%, unemployment 8.69% — stable base</li>
 <li>NATO Finland deployment (UFöU3) plays to security-focused voters</li>
 <li>S's tactical FiU48 vote reduces opposition's ability to attack government on energy</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>SD-M demonstrations fracture does not escalate beyond interpellation</li>
 <li>ECHR does not issue interim measure on HD03235 before election</li>
 <li>No major scandal emerges before September 13</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-wild-card">Wild card<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wild-card">Wild card<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wild-card"></a></h4>
 <p>KD-SD healthcare fracture (SoU17 R15) escalates — KD signals it will not pass next healthcare funding bill without additional appropriation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30">S-2: Narrow S-Led Government After Election (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative-1">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30">S-2: Narrow S-Led Government After Election (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2-narrow-s-led-government-after-election-30"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative-1">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-1"></a></h4>
 <p>S successfully exploits welfare-state narrative built on 77 committee reservations (SfU18+SoU16+SoU17). S+V+MP+C form narrow majority (≥175 seats). FiU48 energy relief proves insufficient — voters prioritise healthcare. New government rolls back HD03235, re-opens NATO deployment for debate.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>77 cumulative opposition reservations represent largest coordinated campaign in 2025/26 [A2]</li>
 <li>S's Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) shows strategic focus</li>
 <li>SoU17 R15: KD fracture provides S with cross-coalition evidence of government failure</li>
 <li>Historical: S recovered from 2022 defeat faster than expected</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required-1">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required-1">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-1"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>Healthcare spending remains top voter concern through September</li>
 <li>S successfully converts Svantesson accountability offensive into voter movement</li>
 <li>No S internal scandals</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20">S-3: SD Major Gains — M Pushed Further Right (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative-2">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20">S-3: SD Major Gains — M Pushed Further Right (20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3-sd-major-gains--m-pushed-further-right-20"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative-2">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-2"></a></h4>
 <p>SD achieves 25%+ in polls. SD demands larger role in government, potentially PM candidacy or formal coalition membership. M forced to concede more on immigration/criminal justice. ECHR challenge to HD03235 dismissed — SD vindicated.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10429 (SD challenges M) signals SD's growing assertiveness [B2]</li>
 <li>HD03235 (criminal deportation) is SD's core voter-mobilization policy</li>
 <li>If ECHR upholds HD03235: SD gains major credibility boost</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required-2">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required-2">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-2"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>ECHR does not issue adverse ruling on HD03235 before election</li>
 <li>Major immigration/crime incident amplified in media</li>
 <li>SD successfully distinguishes itself from M on demonstrations/civil liberties</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10">S-4: Coalition Collapse Before Election (10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-narrative-3">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10">S-4: Coalition Collapse Before Election (10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4-coalition-collapse-before-election-10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-narrative-3">Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-3"></a></h4>
 <p>SD withholds support on a critical budget vote in June/July. Emergency SD-S-V situation. Early election or minority government operating under SD's demands escalate beyond acceptable levels for M/KD/L.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3">Evidence supporting this scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-supporting-this-scenario-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10429: SD publicly challenges M on demonstrations — crossing formal interpellation line [B2]</li>
 <li>SoU17 R15: KD healthcare fracture creates second pressure point</li>
 <li>If both fractures converge on same autumn bill, loss of majority in chamber possible</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-conditions-required-3">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-conditions-required-3">Conditions required<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conditions-required-3"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>SD and KD jointly oppose a government bill in same vote</li>
 <li>S refuses to provide replacement support</li>
 <li>Constitutional mechanism for constructive vote of no confidence invoked</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-timeline">Scenario Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-timeline">Scenario Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 gantt
     title Scenario Activation Timeline
@@ -1330,12 +1330,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-timeline">Scenario Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     section S-4 Coalition Collapse
     Risk window — autumn budget :2026-06-01, 2026-08-31</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 5-dimension register, L×I scoring, cascading chains
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] | <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1442,8 +1442,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1–5)</th><th>Impact (1–5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Category</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>Healthcare battle escalates to coalition crisis (SD-KD fracture on SoU17 R15)</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td><strong>15</strong></td><td>Political/Coalition</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>ECHR challenge to HD03235 criminal deportation produces adverse ruling before election</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Legal/Constitutional</td><td>B3</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>S accountability offensive on Svantesson (HD10442 series) produces ministerial resignation</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Political/Personnel</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Energy prices fall before election — FiU48 relief looks retroactively unnecessary and fiscally irresponsible</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Economic/Political</td><td>B3</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>SD escalates challenge to Justice Minister (HD10429 demonstrations) — coalition rupture before election</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td>Coalition/Stability</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>UFöU3 (1,200 troops Finland) triggers Russian escalation response</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>Security/International</td><td>B3</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Miljöprövningsmyndigheten (HD03238) delayed by judicial review or implementation challenges</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>Administrative/Regulatory</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Opposition builds coherent anti-government welfare narrative from 77 reservations</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td>Electoral/Political</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>R9</td><td>Wind power (HD03239) municipal buy-in fails — renewable buildout stalls</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td>Energy/Climate</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Coalition majority collapses pre-election — vote of no confidence</td><td>1</td><td>5</td><td><strong>5</strong></td><td>Constitutional/Political</td><td>C4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse">Chain A: Healthcare → Coalition Collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading Risk Chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse">Chain A: Healthcare → Coalition Collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>SoU17 R15 SD-KD fracture [R1 → L3/I5]
 → Healthcare debate escalation in campaign
 → SD demands policy concessions to maintain support
@@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-a-healthcare--coalition-collapse">Chain A: Healthcare → Coali
 → [R10 → L2/I5] Loss of coalition majority
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 15% (Unlikely, WEP standard). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html</a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation">Chain B: Accountability → Finance Minister Resignation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation">Chain B: Accountability → Finance Minister Resignation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>Svantesson interpellation series (HD10442) [R3]
 → Potential false-statement allegation
 → Media escalation
@@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-b-accountability--finance-minister-resignation">Chain B: Accoun
 → Resignation or ministerial crisis (election year)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 10% (Very unlikely, WEP). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html</a></p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative">Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative">Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>77 reservations [R8 → L4/I4]
 → S + V + MP coordinated healthcare campaign
 → Opinion polls shift on healthcare competence
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-c-electoral-welfare-narrative">Chain C: Electoral Welfare Narra
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 45% (Roughly even, WEP). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update">Posterior Probability Assessment (Bayesian update)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update">Posterior Probability Assessment (Bayesian update)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-assessment-bayesian-update">Posterior Probabili
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>Prior P</th><th>Update trigger</th><th>Posterior P</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R8 opposition welfare narrative</td><td>40%</td><td>S already filing 5 Svantesson interpellations in 48 hrs</td><td><strong>55%</strong> [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>R1 healthcare coalition crisis</td><td>15%</td><td>SD-KD fracture documented in SoU17 R15</td><td><strong>20%</strong> [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R2 ECHR HD03235</td><td>20%</td><td>ECHR rapporteur precedents on similar laws</td><td><strong>22%</strong> [B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R5 SD-M rupture</td><td>10%</td><td>HD10429 is formal challenge, not just rhetoric</td><td><strong>15%</strong> [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heatmap"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Risk Heatmap — L×I Scores (April 2026)"
@@ -1514,12 +1514,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heatmap">Risk Heatmap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
     y-axis "L×I Score" 0 --> 20
     bar [16, 15, 10, 9, 8, 8, 6, 6, 5, 5]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: SWOT + TOWS matrix | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-framework">SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-framework">SWOT Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Comprehensive pre-election delivery</strong>: Government tabled its final legislative package including spring budget (HD03100, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html</a>), fuel relief (HD01FiU48, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html</a>), and energy reform (HD03240) [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-party defence consensus</strong>: UFöU3 (NATO Finland, 1,200 troops) passed with cross-party support — security is a government strength [A1]</li>
@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <li><strong>Fiscal credibility</strong>: Surplus rule maintained in Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100); Svantesson framing "responsible but caring" fiscal management [A2]</li>
 <li><strong>Energy governance modernization</strong>: Miljöprövningsmyndigheten (HD03238) addresses Sweden's notoriously slow permitting — business community broadly supportive [A2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Healthcare vulnerability</strong>: SfU18 (39 reservations), SoU16 (20 reservations), SoU17 (18 reservations) = 77 total reservations across 3 committees — deepest opposition battleground of the session [A1, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a>]</li>
 <li><strong>SD-KD coalition stress</strong>: Joint SD-KD reservation on SoU17 R15 reveals healthcare prioritization disagreement within governing support base [A1, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html</a>]</li>
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li><strong>Fiscal deterioration signal</strong>: 4.1 GSEK HD01FiU48 emergency spending increases deficit — critics note structural inconsistency with surplus rule narrative [A2]</li>
 <li><strong>Unemployment elevated</strong>: 8.69% unemployment (2025 World Bank data) — highest in a decade among Nordic peers; S's main economic attack vector [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Electoral energy narrative</strong>: If fuel price relief reduces household energy bills visibly before September 2026, it directly validates the government's pre-election promise [B2]</li>
 <li><strong>Wind power local buy-in</strong>: HD03239 (municipal revenue from wind power) resolves the key local acceptance barrier for renewable buildout — potential for M+C+L joint electoral appeal on climate-economy integration [A2]</li>
@@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <li><strong>Paid police education (HD03237)</strong>: Broadens police recruitment pipeline — visible anti-crime commitment ahead of election [B2]</li>
 <li><strong>Digital infrastructure</strong>: TU21 (state e-ID) + TU17 (anti-fraud telecoms) create observable digital governance improvements valued by younger voters [B2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Healthcare campaign</strong>: S, V, and MP have built a coherent welfare-state narrative across 77 combined reservations — organized opposition attack on government's most vulnerable flank [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Energy price reversal</strong>: If Middle East tensions ease and energy prices fall before election, HD01FiU48's electoral value diminishes and fiscal deterioration looks opportunistic [B3]</li>
@@ -1552,7 +1552,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <li><strong>Svantesson accountability</strong>: S's coordination of 5 interpellations against Finance Minister Svantesson (HD10442 and series) — including potential false-statement allegation — creates targeted ministerial accountability risk [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths</th><th>Weaknesses</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO — Exploit</strong>: Use energy relief + wind power narrative to claim climate-economy integration leadership</td><td><strong>WO — Improve</strong>: Pre-empt healthcare attacks by fast-tracking SoU committee recommendations; repair SD-KD healthcare rift before campaign</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST — Protect</strong>: Lock in NATO/defence consensus to prevent opposition from finding national security wedge</td><td><strong>WT — Avoid</strong>: Minimize ECHR exposure by pre-complying HD03235 provisions; prevent SD from escalating demonstration-rights conflict</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-pattern"></a></h3>
 <p>The month's dominant pattern is <strong>electoral positioning under fiscal constraint</strong>: the government uses targeted household relief (energy costs) to compensate for structural weaknesses (healthcare, unemployment) while banking on security/NATO as a non-contested strength. The SD-KD healthcare fracture is the single most dangerous SWOT element — if it widens, it could force a headline coalition crisis during the campaign.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
@@ -1595,13 +1595,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot-pattern">Cross-SWOT Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     "Wind power HD03239": [0.55, 0.65]
     "8.7% unemployment": [0.80, 0.10]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political Threat Taxonomy + Attack Tree + MITRE-style TTP mapping
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1">Threat T1: Electoral Welfare Narrative Attack [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1">Threat T1: Electoral Welfare Narrative Attack [HIGH — A1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t1-electoral-welfare-narrative-attack-high--a1">Threat T1: Ele
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>Socialdemokraterna (S) + Vänsterpartiet (V) + Miljöpartiet (MP)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>Kristersson government's healthcare and social insurance record</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>77 committee reservations + interpellation series + campaign messaging</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>SfU18 (39 reservations, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a>), SoU16 (20), SoU17 (18) as evidence base</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>Now through September 13, 2026 election</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-POL-001: Coordinated legislative opposition documentation → T-POL-002: Public opinion amplification → T-POL-003: Ministerial accountability targeting</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2">Threat T2: Intra-Coalition Defection — SD Challenges M [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2">Threat T2: Intra-Coalition Defection — SD Challenges M [MEDIUM — B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t2-intra-coalition-defection--sd-challenges-m-medium--b2">Thre
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD) [Farivar et al.]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>HD10429 formal interpellation on demonstration rights restrictions in Prop. 133</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>SD using formal parliamentary mechanism against governing-side party — unprecedented in 2025/26 riksmöte</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>Immediate; interpellation pending response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-COA-001: Support-party formal dissent → T-COA-002: Public signals to SD voter base → T-COA-003: Coalition renegotiation pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3">Threat T3: Legal/ECHR Challenge to Criminal Deportation [MEDIUM — B3]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3">Threat T3: Legal/ECHR Challenge to Criminal Deportation [MEDIUM — B3]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t3-legalechr-challenge-to-criminal-deportation-medium--b3">Thr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>NGO network (Human Rights Watch, ECRE, Swedish legal NGOs) + ECHR applicants</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>HD03235 (criminal deportation, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>ECHR proportionality challenge + Swedish constitutional court review</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>L×I risk 15/25; prior ECHR precedents on similar deportation laws</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>6–18 months from enactment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-LEG-001: Challenge filing → T-LEG-002: Interim measures request → T-LEG-003: High-profile case selection</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2">Threat T4: S Accountability Offensive — Svantesson [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2">Threat T4: S Accountability Offensive — Svantesson [HIGH — A2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threat-t4-s-accountability-offensive--svantesson-high--a2">Threat T4:
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Threat actor</strong></td><td>Socialdemokraterna (S) finance team</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Target</strong></td><td>Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Vector</strong></td><td>5 interpellations in 48 hours (HD10442 series); HD10442 cites court ruling potentially contradicting Svantesson's statements</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Mechanism</strong></td><td>Systematic ministerial pressure: healthcare spending + fiscal accountability + ätstörningsvård [A1]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timing</strong></td><td>Immediate; response required within parliamentary rules</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MITRE-style TTP</strong></td><td>T-ACC-001: Evidence-based interpellation series → T-ACC-002: Media coordination → T-ACC-003: Confidence erosion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 graph TD
     ROOT["🎯 GOAL: Undermine Kristersson Government Before September 2026 Election"]
@@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree">Attack Tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     style C fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#000000
     style D fill:#F57C00,stroke:#F57C00,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative">Threat Vector Phase Analysis — Threat T1 (Welfare Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative">Threat Vector Phase Analysis — Threat T1 (Welfare Narrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1825,16 +1825,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-vector-phase-analysis--threat-t1-welfare-narrative">Threat Vec
 <p><strong>Government countermeasure</strong>: Fast-track SoU committee recommendations; announce healthcare investment in autumn budget preview.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48">HD01FiU48<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01FiU48 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet | <strong>Date</strong>: April 22, 2026 (enacted)
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01FiU48 is the Finance Committee's report authorising a temporary reduction in fuel excise tax of approximately 82 öre per litre effective May 1 through September 30, 2026. The measure provides direct household relief on transport energy costs.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 10/10 (Tier 1 Critical)</p>
 <p>This is the most politically significant enactment of April 2026. Passed with M+SD+S+KD majority — the opposition S party's tactical affirmative vote validates cross-spectrum appeal and creates an unusual cross-coalition consensus on a flagship economic measure.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1857,30 +1857,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable (official Riksdag record)</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed by multiple sources</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-stakeholders">Key Stakeholders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-stakeholders"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-stakeholders">Key Stakeholders<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-stakeholders"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Proponents</strong>: M (fiscal relief), SD (voter cost-of-living), KD (family budgets), S (tactical)</li>
 <li><strong>Opponents</strong>: V and MP (environmental: petrol demand increase); L (abstained)</li>
 <li><strong>Beneficiaries</strong>: Swedish households — particularly rural and suburban car-dependent</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-domain">Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-domain">Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-domain"></a></h3>
 <p>Fiscal / Energy / Household economics</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html</a></li>
 <li>HD01FiU48 Riksdagen committee report</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu18">HD01SfU18<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu18"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01SfU18 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Socialförsäkringsutskottet | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01SfU18 is the Social Insurance Committee's report on social insurance reform. It contains 39 opposition reservations — the largest single-document reservation count in the 2025/26 riksmöte.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>39 reservations represent the primary documented evidence for the opposition's welfare-state attack narrative. Combined with SoU16 (20) and SoU17 (18), total 77 reservations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-1">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-1">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1903,21 +1903,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-1">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition (Government Bill)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Finansdepartementet | <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03100 is the government's spring economic proposition — Vårproposition 2026. It contains the fiscal framework for 2026/27, including tax and expenditure adjustments.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 9/10 (Tier 1 Critical)</p>
 <p>The spring economic bill is the government's central pre-election economic message. It establishes the fiscal space narrative for the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-2">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-2">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1940,23 +1940,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-2">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03235">HD03235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03235"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03235 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition (Government Bill)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Justitiedepartementet | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03235 extends criminal deportation rules — individuals convicted of serious crimes can face deportation even if granted Swedish residency/citizenship. This is a Tidöavtalet flagship delivery.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>SD's central immigration enforcement demand. High ECHR proportionality challenge risk (L×I: 15/25). Passed with M+SD majority.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-risk">Key Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-risk">Key Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-risk"></a></h3>
 <p>ECHR challenge timing is critical. An adverse ECHR ruling before September 13, 2026 would significantly harm SD and M's law-and-order narrative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-3">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-3">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1979,22 +1979,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-3">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10429">HD10429<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10429"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10429 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>From</strong>: SD | <strong>To</strong>: Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M)
 <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10429 is SD's interpellation challenging Justice Minister Strömmer on the Prop. 133 demonstration rights restriction. SD objects that the restrictions are too broad and may limit legitimate demonstrations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 8/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>This is an unprecedented intra-coalition challenge — a support party formally interpellating a minister from the governing bloc. Signals SD's growing assertiveness and its potential to leverage formal parliamentary mechanisms.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-4">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-4">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-4"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2017,22 +2017,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-4">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10442">HD10442<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10442"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10442 | <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>From</strong>: S | <strong>To</strong>: Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)
 <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10442 is one of S's 5 interpellations filed against Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson in a 48-hour period in April 2026. This interpellation concerns ätstörningsvård (eating disorder care) funding, citing a court ruling that potentially contradicts Svantesson's public statements.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 7/10 (Tier 2 High)</p>
 <p>The five-interpellation series represents a coordinated accountability offensive. The eating disorder care angle — which resonates with healthcare narrative — adds emotional weight to a financial accountability argument.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-5">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-5">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-5"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2055,21 +2055,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-5">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html</a></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-uföu3">UFöU3<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uföu3"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UF%C3%B6U3-analysis.md"><code>documents/UFöU3-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: UFöU3 | <strong>Type</strong>: Betänkande (Committee Report)
 <strong>Committee</strong>: Utrikesutskottet/Försvarsutskottet | <strong>Date</strong>: April 2026 (pending Chamber vote June 4)
 <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>UFöU3 authorises the deployment of 1,200 Swedish troops to NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) battalion in Finland. This is Sweden's largest single military commitment since NATO accession in March 2024.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW Score</strong>: 9/10 (Tier 1 Critical)</p>
 <p>UFöU3 represents Sweden's most significant NATO post-accession commitment. The broad parliamentary consensus (cross-party support anticipated) signals Sweden's credibility as a NATO ally.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-6">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-6">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment-6"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2092,19 +2092,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment-6">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Element</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Source reliability</td><td>A — Completely reliable</td></tr><tr><td>Information quality</td><td>1 — Confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence</td><td><strong>A1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UF%C3%B6U3.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UFöU3.html</a></li>
 <li>Riksdag committee report on defence deployment</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Electoral projection + coalition viability assessment
 <strong>Election date</strong>: September 13, 2026
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026">Current Seat Projection (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026">Current Seat Projection (April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2190,18 +2190,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-projection-april-2026">Current Seat Projection (April 20
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Current seats (2022)</th><th>April 2026 projection</th><th>Change</th><th>Coalition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>66–70</td><td>±2</td><td>Governing</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>74–80</td><td>+4</td><td>Governing support</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>17–20</td><td>±2</td><td>Governing</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>15–18</td><td>±2</td><td>Governing</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total right bloc</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>172–188</strong></td><td>±10</td><td>Majority if ≥175</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>100–108</td><td>-3</td><td>Opposition lead</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>22–25</td><td>±2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>15–19</td><td>±2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>22–26</td><td>±2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total left-centre bloc</strong></td><td><strong>173</strong></td><td><strong>159–178</strong></td><td>±10</td><td>Minority unless C</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total Riksdag seats</strong>: 349. <strong>Majority threshold</strong>: 175.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-electoral-dynamics">Key Electoral Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-dynamics"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect">1. SD Polarisation Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-electoral-dynamics">Key Electoral Dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-dynamics"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect">1. SD Polarisation Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-sd-polarisation-effect"></a></h4>
 <p>SD at 73 seats is the second-largest party. If SD gains from HD03235 criminal deportation narrative, it could reach 78–80 seats — the most in Swedish electoral history. Counter-risk: ECHR adverse ruling diminishes SD's legal credibility on deportation.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Current seat distribution from riksdag-regering.se ledamöter statistics; WEP: <strong>Roughly even</strong> whether SD gains or holds.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-kd-fragility">2. KD Fragility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-kd-fragility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-kd-fragility">2. KD Fragility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-kd-fragility"></a></h4>
 <p>KD's 19 seats in 2022 represents a historical minimum. SoU17 R15 healthcare fracture signals KD voters may migrate to M or S. If KD falls below 4% threshold: <strong>governing bloc loses 19 seats</strong> — potentially catastrophic.</p>
 <p><strong>KD threshold risk</strong>: WEP: <strong>Unlikely</strong> but non-negligible (10%) if healthcare narrative dominates.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-ss-strategic-position">3. S's Strategic Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ss-strategic-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-ss-strategic-position">3. S's Strategic Position<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-ss-strategic-position"></a></h4>
 <p>S at 107 seats needs C (24 seats) to form majority. C's position is ambiguous — market liberal, could support either bloc. S's FiU48 tactical vote signals S is willing to cooperate with right on energy — may attract C.</p>
 <p><strong>WEP</strong>: <strong>Roughly even</strong> whether C supports S-led or M-led government.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Election 2026 — Projected Seats by Party"
@@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-matrix">Coalition Viability Matrix<a class="" ari
     y-axis "Projected seats" 0 --> 120
     bar [104, 77, 68, 23, 24, 18, 17, 16]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september">Forward Electoral Indicators (April → September)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september">Forward Electoral Indicators (April → September)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2253,12 +2253,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-electoral-indicators-april--september">Forward Electoral Indi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Target</th><th>Current status</th><th>Risk if missed</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48 household relief effective</td><td>May 1 2026</td><td>ENACTED — on track</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO deployment vote</td><td>June 4 2026</td><td>Pending Chamber vote</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Autumn budget preview</td><td>August 2026</td><td>Not yet announced</td><td>High — KD fracture</td></tr><tr><td>KD polling floor</td><td>≥5%</td><td>At risk per SoU17 fracture</td><td>Critical</td></tr><tr><td>S-C coalition signal</td><td>Before August</td><td>Not yet signalled</td><td>Medium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Riksdag vote mathematics — 349 seats, 175-seat majority threshold
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result">Seat Distribution — Current Riksdag (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result">Seat Distribution — Current Riksdag (2022 election result)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2327,7 +2327,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-distribution--current-riksdag-2022-election-result">Seat Distrib
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Bloc</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Largest party</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>Governing support</td><td>2nd largest</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>Governing</td><td>PM party</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Pivot party</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Below historical avg</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>Governing</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>Governing</td><td>Fragility risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Governing bloc (M+KD+L + SD support)</strong>: 176 seats = majority by 1</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026">HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — April 22, 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026">HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — April 22, 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hd01fiu48-vote-analysis--april-22-2026">HD01FiU48 Vote Analysis — A
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Absent</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Governing — full support</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Governing support — full support</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — tactical yes vote</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Governing junior — full support</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>16</td><td>0</td><td>Governing junior — abstained</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — no</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — no</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>Opposition — abstained</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>267</strong></td><td><strong>42</strong></td><td><strong>40</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td>Result: PASSED</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: HD01FiU48 riksdagen.se — vote passed April 22, 2026 [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes">Pivotal Vote Table — Key Upcoming Votes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes">Pivotal Vote Table — Key Upcoming Votes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2452,7 +2452,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-vote-table--key-upcoming-votes">Pivotal Vote Table — Key Up
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Vote</th><th>Date</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Required support</th><th>Governing bloc sufficient?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO deployment</td><td>June 4, 2026</td><td>175</td><td>M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Yes — 176 seats</td></tr><tr><td>Autumn budget 2026/27</td><td>September/October 2026</td><td>175</td><td>M+SD+KD+L</td><td>Yes — IF KD stays</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32 constitutional re-approval</td><td>Post-election</td><td>175</td><td>M+SD+KD+L or new majority</td><td>Depends on election</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-fragility-map">Coalition Fragility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fragility-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-fragility-map">Coalition Fragility Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-fragility-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 graph TD
     GOV["Governing majority: 176 seats&#x3C;br/>Threshold: 175"]
@@ -2487,9 +2487,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-fragility-map">Coalition Fragility Map<a class="" aria-hidd
     style RISK2 fill:#F57C00,stroke:#F57C00,color:#FFFFFF
     style RISK3 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#ff006e,color:#FFFFFF</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-demographic-impact-analysis">Demographic Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-impact-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-demographic-impact-analysis">Demographic Impact Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-impact-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2560,7 +2560,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-demographic-impact-analysis">Demographic Impact Analysis<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Policy impact</th><th>Key document</th><th>Net effect</th><th>Electoral implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Working families (car-dependent, suburban/rural)</td><td>+82 öre/l fuel relief</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td><strong>Positive</strong></td><td>Governing bloc +2–3%</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare workers / NHS patients</td><td>Welfare reform uncertainty</td><td>SfU18 + SoU17</td><td><strong>Negative</strong></td><td>Opposition +1–2%</td></tr><tr><td>Young adults (18–29)</td><td>Housing, demonstration rights</td><td>HC023443 + HD10429</td><td><strong>Mixed</strong></td><td>Volatile — possible SD or C gain</td></tr><tr><td>Pensioners</td><td>Social insurance reform</td><td>SfU18 SoU16</td><td><strong>Uncertain</strong></td><td>High sensitivity to SfU18 changes</td></tr><tr><td>Rural voters</td><td>Fuel relief + agricultural energy</td><td>HD01FiU48 + HD03240</td><td><strong>Positive</strong></td><td>SD + M + C benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Urban professionals</td><td>Civil liberties, climate</td><td>HD10429 + HD024082</td><td><strong>Negative toward governing</strong></td><td>MP + S + L benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Immigrants (naturalised citizens)</td><td>Criminal deportation extension</td><td>HD03235</td><td><strong>Very negative</strong></td><td>S + V benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Defence/security voters</td><td>NATO commitment</td><td>UFöU3</td><td><strong>Positive</strong></td><td>Governing bloc + C benefit</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2604,7 +2604,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Region</th><th>Key concerns</th><th>Governing bloc advantage</th><th>Opposition advantage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Norrland</td><td>Energy costs, rural transport</td><td>HD01FiU48 + HD03240 electricity</td><td>Healthcare access — SoU17</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholm</td><td>Housing, civil liberties, climate</td><td>N/A</td><td>MP + S + C</td></tr><tr><td>Skåne</td><td>Immigration enforcement</td><td>HD03235</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Västra Götaland</td><td>Manufacturing, energy costs</td><td>HD01FiU48 + energy package</td><td>Healthcare (regional council governance)</td></tr><tr><td>Gotland / military regions</td><td>Defence, NATO</td><td>UFöU3</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mobilisation-index">Mobilisation Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mobilisation-index"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mobilisation-index">Mobilisation Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mobilisation-index"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Voter Mobilisation Potential by Issue (1=low, 10=high)"
@@ -2613,13 +2613,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-mobilisation-index">Mobilisation Index<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     bar [8, 9, 7, 6, 7, 5, 6]</pre>
 <p><strong>Top insight</strong>: Healthcare is the highest-mobilisation issue (9/10) and favours the opposition — this is the government's primary vulnerability heading into September 2026.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Nordic + EU comparator analysis
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure">Comparator 1: Finland — Coalition Stability Under Security Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure">Comparator 1: Finland — Coalition Stability Under Security Pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-1-finland--coalition-stability-under-security-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026"></a></h4>
 <p>Finland's Orpo government (2023-present) has maintained a right-wing coalition (KOK+PS+SFP+KD) under similar pressures: immigration restrictive policies, welfare-state opposition criticism, and enhanced NATO commitments. Key parallels:</p>
 
 
@@ -2660,8 +2660,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hi
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Finland's Orpo government maintained coalition despite similar fractures. Sweden's coalition fractures (HD10429, SoU17 R15) are structurally comparable — not yet destabilising.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: World Bank Finland GDP data + Nordic Council comparative reports + UFöU3 bilateral agreement</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math">Comparator 2: Germany — Bundestag Post-2025 Coalition Math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math">Comparator 2: Germany — Bundestag Post-2025 Coalition Math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-2-germany--bundestag-post-2025-coalition-math"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's CDU/CSU-SPD grand coalition (2025-present) represents a model of pragmatic cross-aisle cooperation on energy and security. Relevant to Sweden's HD01FiU48 passage (S voted yes with government on energy relief):</p>
 
 
@@ -2702,8 +2702,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-1">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Germany's experience shows cross-party energy cooperation is possible without triggering opposition collapse — S's tactical FiU48 vote mirrors SPD's flexibility in grand coalition.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Bundestag.de energy package records + World Bank Germany GDP 1.1% (2025)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis">Comparator 3: Denmark — Mette Frederiksen's Welfare-Security Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis">Comparator 3: Denmark — Mette Frederiksen's Welfare-Security Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-3-denmark--mette-frederiksens-welfare-security-synthesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark's SVM-government (S+V+M) under Frederiksen demonstrates that a social-democratic party can govern with right-wing support while maintaining welfare credibility:</p>
 
 
@@ -2739,7 +2739,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-sweden-2026-2">Parallels to Sweden 2026<a class="" aria-
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: S's tactical FiU48 vote may be part of broader "responsible opposition" strategy — mimicking Danish Frederiksen model to appeal to centrist voters. Healthcare investment gap is Sweden's key differentiation point.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Danish Folketing records + OECD Social Expenditure Database</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-assessment">Summary Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-assessment">Summary Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-assessment"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'primaryTextColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Nordic Governance Performance Matrix April 2026
@@ -2755,16 +2755,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-summary-assessment">Summary Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     Germany Friedrich: [0.60, 0.50]</pre>
 <p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Sweden's coalition stability is on par with Finland's comparable right-wing government. The key vulnerability relative to Denmark is healthcare investment — the dimension where S can differentiate.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Named precedents ≤40 years from analysis date
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy">Parallel 1: Bildt Government Fiscal Consolidation (1991–94) — Direct Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy">Parallel 1: Bildt Government Fiscal Consolidation (1991–94) — Direct Analogy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-bildt-government-fiscal-consolidation-199194--direct-analogy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h4>
 <p>Carl Bildt's (M) bourgeois four-party coalition (M+KD+FP+C) governed 1991–94. The coalition managed a severe banking crisis while delivering fiscal consolidation. The coalition fractured on several issues but survived to 1994 — only losing to S after three years.</p>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 1991–1994 — within 40 years from 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-2026">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2804,11 +2804,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Even a competent fiscal manager can lose the election to a welfare-state narrative. Bildt's government lost in 1994 despite turning the budget around. Kristersson faces the same risk.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Swedish government historical records + SIFO polling archives (public records)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model">Parallel 2: Reinfeldt Alliance (2006–2014) — Success Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model">Parallel 2: Reinfeldt Alliance (2006–2014) — Success Model<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-reinfeldt-alliance-20062014--success-model"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Fredrik Reinfeldt's "Alliance" (M+KD+FP+C) governed for two terms (2006–10, 2010–14). Key achievement: "arbetslinjen" — lowering unemployment by reducing social insurance generosity. Reinfeldt's 2010 re-election (first in M history) came after clear economic messaging.</p>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2006–2014 — within 40 years from 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-1">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-1">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-1"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2848,11 +2848,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-1">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Reinfeldt won re-election with "arbetslinjen" despite similar welfare-state opposition criticism. Key was economic credibility. Kristersson's path mirrors this — but without S's vote at HD01FiU48, the cross-party validation is harder.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: SCB statistics + Riksdag historical records</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage">Parallel 3: 2021 Löfven Government Crisis — Support-Party Leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage">Parallel 3: 2021 Löfven Government Crisis — Support-Party Leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-2021-löfven-government-crisis--support-party-leverage"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h4>
 <p>PM Stefan Löfven lost a vote of no confidence in June 2021 when SD + right-wing parties voted against the government. Löfven initially chose dissolution election, then resigned — Magdalena Andersson became PM. Lesson: support-party leverage can destabilise a minority government.</p>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2021 — within 40 years from 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-2">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-2">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallels-to-2026-2"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2887,12 +2887,12 @@ <h3 id="rm-parallels-to-2026-2">Parallels to 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: SD demonstrated in 2021 that it would use formal parliamentary mechanisms. HD10429 interpellation is a lower-severity version of the same leverage play.</p>
 <p><strong>Source</strong>: Riksdag records, konstitutionsutskottet proceedings (public records)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Delivery-risk assessment per major legislation
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register">Key Legislation Delivery Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register">Key Legislation Delivery Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2964,7 +2964,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-legislation-delivery-risk-register">Key Legislation Delivery Risk
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Type</th><th>Status</th><th>Implementation deadline</th><th>Delivery risk</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Energy relief</td><td>ENACTED April 22</td><td>May 1, 2026</td><td>LOW</td><td>Tax authority (Skatteverket) implementation straightforward</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Criminal deportation</td><td>ENACTED (date TBC)</td><td>June 2026</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>ECHR challenge risk; Migrationsverket capacity</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>NATO deployment</td><td>Pending June 4 vote</td><td>2026–2027</td><td>LOW</td><td>Cross-party support; military logistics pre-planned</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Electricity market</td><td>Committee stage</td><td>Late 2026</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU directive compliance required; grid operator coordination</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Energy taxation</td><td>Committee stage</td><td>2027</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Multi-year implementation; industry consultation</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>Constitutional amendment (media)</td><td>Vilande — post-election</td><td>2027</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Requires re-approval after September election</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU18</td><td>Social insurance reform</td><td>Government bill</td><td>2027</td><td>HIGH</td><td>39 opposition reservations signal revision risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix">Delivery Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix">Delivery Feasibility Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Implementation Feasibility vs. Political Priority
@@ -2981,27 +2981,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-delivery-feasibility-matrix">Delivery Feasibility Matrix<a class="" a
     HD01KU32 constitutional: [0.70, 0.25]
     HD01SfU18 social insurance: [0.75, 0.30]</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical Path Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation">1. May 1 — FiU48 tax relief activation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical Path Items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation">1. May 1 — FiU48 tax relief activation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-may-1--fiu48-tax-relief-activation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Owner</strong>: Skatteverket + Energimyndigheten
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Very low — administrative mechanism exists
 <strong>Monitoring indicator</strong>: Petrol station price data week of May 5</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote">2. June 4 — UFöU3 Chamber vote<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote">2. June 4 — UFöU3 Chamber vote<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-june-4--uföu3-chamber-vote"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Owner</strong>: Riksdag + Försvarsdepartementet
 <strong>Risk</strong>: Low — cross-party support confirmed
 <strong>Monitoring indicator</strong>: Final vote margin > 200</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation">3. Q3 2026 — SfU18 social insurance implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation">3. Q3 2026 — SfU18 social insurance implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-q3-2026--sfu18-social-insurance-implementation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Owner</strong>: Försäkringskassan
 <strong>Risk</strong>: HIGH — 39 reservations suggest political pressure to revise
 <strong>Monitoring indicator</strong>: Government announcement of implementation date before/after election</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — minimum 3 competing hypotheses
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypotheses">Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypotheses">Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypotheses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3029,7 +3029,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypotheses">Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Prior probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1</td><td>Government's April legislative package is a genuine pre-election fiscal consolidation</td><td>45%</td></tr><tr><td>H2</td><td>S's FiU48 vote was a strategic error that will backfire by blunting opposition energy narrative</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>H3</td><td>SD-M fracture (HD10429) is a deliberate SD voter-mobilization signal, not a real coalition threat</td><td>25%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix">Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix">Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3090,7 +3090,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-evidence-vs-hypothesis-matrix">Evidence vs. Hypothesis Matrix<a class
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence item</th><th>H1</th><th>H2</th><th>H3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU48 passed with S+KD support</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 spring economic bill passes</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>77 committee reservations by opposition</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>SD's HD10429 challenges M on demonstrations</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>SoU17 R15: KD-SD fracture on healthcare</td><td>Inconsistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Inconsistent</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442: S's 5 interpellations vs. Svantesson</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank: stable GDP 0.82%</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO deployment broad support</td><td>Consistent</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral">Hypothesis scores (+ = supports, - = contradicts, 0 = neutral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral">Hypothesis scores (+ = supports, - = contradicts, 0 = neutral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3118,7 +3118,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-scores---supports----contradicts-0--neutral">Hypothesis sc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Score</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1 Fiscal consolidation genuine</td><td>+3 / -1 = <strong>net +2</strong></td><td>Supported — primary hypothesis stands</td></tr><tr><td>H2 S FiU48 vote strategic error</td><td>+2 / -1 = <strong>net +1</strong></td><td>Weakly supported — uncertain</td></tr><tr><td>H3 SD fracture is deliberate signal</td><td>+1 / -1 = <strong>net 0</strong></td><td>Not supported — may be real fracture</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation">Counter-argument 1: H1 Challenge — "Fiscal Package is Pre-Election Spending, Not Consolidation"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation">Counter-argument 1: H1 Challenge — "Fiscal Package is Pre-Election Spending, Not Consolidation"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spending-not-consolidation"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: HD03100 + HD01FiU48 represent electoral give-aways, not genuine fiscal management. The government is spending its fiscal space before September 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for this challenge</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3134,7 +3134,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-argument-1-h1-challenge--fiscal-package-is-pre-election-spend
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net verdict</strong>: H1 stands with caveats — fiscal package is partially electoral, partially consolidation. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise">Counter-argument 2: H2 Challenge — "S's FiU48 Vote Was Actually Strategically Wise"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise">Counter-argument 2: H2 Challenge — "S's FiU48 Vote Was Actually Strategically Wise"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategically-wise"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: S's vote for HD01FiU48 is rational — it shows S as responsible, not reflexively oppositional. Voters trust a party that can vote for useful measures.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for this challenge</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3150,7 +3150,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-argument-2-h2-challenge--ss-fiu48-vote-was-actually-strategic
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net verdict</strong>: H2 weakly supported — risk for S remains if MP coalition partner is alienated. [B3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater">Counter-argument 3: H3 Refinement — "SD-M Fracture Is Real, Not Just Theater"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater">Counter-argument 3: H3 Refinement — "SD-M Fracture Is Real, Not Just Theater"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-theater"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: SD's HD10429 interpellation represents a genuine policy dispute (demonstration rights) where SD believes the Prop. 133 restriction goes too far — exposing SD's civil-libertarian streak.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for this challenge</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3166,13 +3166,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-counter-argument-3-h3-refinement--sd-m-fracture-is-real-not-just-thea
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Net verdict</strong>: H3 partially revised — 60% deliberate signal + 40% genuine policy dispute. [B2]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: 7-dimension political classification
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment">Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment">Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3221,7 +3221,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-1-ideological-alignment">Dimension 1: Ideological Alignment
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Ideological alignment</th><th>Party</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03235 (criminal deportation)</td><td>Far-right enforcement</td><td>SD/M</td><td>Tidöavtalet delivery</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236 (fuel tax relief)</td><td>Centre-right populist</td><td>M/SD/KD/L</td><td>Cross-coalition; S also voted yes</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 (NATO Finland)</td><td>Cross-spectrum national security</td><td>All parties except historic opposition</td><td>Sweden's NATO post-accession commitment</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 (electricity laws)</td><td>Centre-right + market liberal</td><td>M/KD/L/C</td><td>EU compliance-driven</td></tr><tr><td>SfU18 (social insurance)</td><td>Centre-left opposition</td><td>S/V/MP/C</td><td>39 reservations against government</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 (Ukraine tribunal)</td><td>Liberal international order</td><td>Broad coalition</td><td>Human rights, rule of law</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-2-policy-domain">Dimension 2: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-policy-domain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-2-policy-domain">Dimension 2: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-policy-domain"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3268,7 +3268,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-2-policy-domain">Dimension 2: Policy Domain<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Domain</th><th>Key documents</th><th>Priority tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fiscal/Economic</td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03236</td><td>Tier 1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>Defence/Security</td><td>UFöU3, HD03214, HD03228</td><td>Tier 1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>Energy/Climate</td><td>HD03240, HD03238, HD03239, HD03242</td><td>Tier 2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare/Social</td><td>SfU18, SoU16, SoU17, HD03216, HD03245</td><td>Tier 2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>Criminal Justice</td><td>HD03235, HD03237, HD03246</td><td>Tier 2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Affairs</td><td>HD03231, HD03232</td><td>Tier 3 — Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Digital/Infrastructure</td><td>HD01TU21, HD01TU17</td><td>Tier 3 — Medium</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026">Dimension 3: Political Salience (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026">Dimension 3: Political Salience (Election 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3310,7 +3310,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-3-political-salience-election-2026">Dimension 3: Political
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Electoral salience</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Household energy relief directly before election</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Government economic narrative</td></tr><tr><td>SfU18+SoU16+17</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Opposition's primary attack vector</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>HIGH</td><td>SD flagship + ECHR risk</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Cross-party consensus, not divisive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Technical but structurally important</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity">Dimension 4: Constitutional Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity">Dimension 4: Constitutional Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3342,7 +3342,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-4-constitutional-sensitivity">Dimension 4: Constitutional S
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Constitutional sensitivity</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01KU32 (media accessibility)</td><td>HIGH — constitutional amendment</td><td>Vilande; requires re-approval after election</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU33 (search/seizure digital)</td><td>HIGH — constitutional amendment</td><td>Vilande; same process</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>HIGH</td><td>ECHR proportionality challenge</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Demonstration rights (fundamental freedom)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-5-international-dimension">Dimension 5: International Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-international-dimension"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-5-international-dimension">Dimension 5: International Dimension<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-international-dimension"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3384,7 +3384,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-5-international-dimension">Dimension 5: International Dimen
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>International dimension</th><th>Treaty/agreement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>HIGH</td><td>NATO Article 5; bilateral Finland agreement</td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Arms export/SIPRI/EU regulation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>HIGH</td><td>International Criminal Court cooperation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>HIGH</td><td>UN reparations principles</td></tr><tr><td>HD03214</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU NIS2 directive implementation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>EU electricity market directive</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline">Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline">Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3421,7 +3421,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-6-urgencytimeline">Dimension 6: Urgency/Timeline<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Deadline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>Enacted April 22 — immediate effect May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Decision June 4 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Pre-election constitutional requirement</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Enactment summer 2026</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Implementation autumn 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR Art. 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR Art. 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3454,7 +3454,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdpr-art-9">Dimension 7: Data Classif
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Data type</th><th>Legal basis</th><th>Risk level</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Voting records (named MPs)</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Party affiliations</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>Political opinions (analysis)</td><td>Art. 9(2)(g) substantial public interest</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Individual MPs' statements</td><td>Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made</td><td>LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-summary">Priority Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-summary">Priority Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 pie title Document Distribution by Priority Tier
     "Tier 1 — Critical" : 5
@@ -3462,12 +3462,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tier-summary">Priority Tier Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="
     "Tier 3 — Medium" : 7
     "Tier 4 — Background" : 3</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Tier-C Aggregation Cross-Reference (ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1">Sibling Analysis Folder References (Tier-C Gate Check 1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1">Sibling Analysis Folder References (Tier-C Gate Check 1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This monthly review synthesises all single-type analyses from the period March 24–April 23, 2026:</p>
 
 
@@ -3567,7 +3567,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folder-references-tier-c-gate-check-1">Sibling Analy
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Folder</th><th>Date</th><th>Type</th><th>Lead story</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/propositions/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Propositions</td><td>Spring fiscal package initial batch</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>Defence + transport committee</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/interpellations/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Interpellations</td><td>Social policy interpellations</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-01/motions/</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>Motions</td><td>Budget counter-motions</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-02/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-02</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>SoU committee reports</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/propositions/</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Propositions</td><td>HD03100 spring economic bill</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>FiU48 energy + SfU18 social</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-14/evening-analysis/</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>Evening Analysis</td><td>Comprehensive April 14 digest</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-15/committeeReports/</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>Committee Reports</td><td>Additional committee reports</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-19/monthly-review/</td><td>2026-04-19</td><td>Monthly Review</td><td>Prior monthly review (Mar 20–Apr 19)</td><td>INGESTED — BASE</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/evening-analysis/</td><td>2026-04-21</td><td>Evening Analysis</td><td>Pre-enactment FiU48 analysis</td><td>INGESTED</td></tr><tr><td>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>Evening Analysis</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted; SD-M fracture confirmed</td><td>INGESTED — MOST RECENT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-table">Document Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-cross-reference-table">Document Cross-Reference Table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-cross-reference-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3659,7 +3659,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-cross-reference-table">Document Cross-Reference Table<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Referenced in</th><th>Connection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Proposition</td><td>significance-scoring, executive-brief, synthesis-summary</td><td>Lead fiscal story</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Proposition</td><td>significance-scoring, risk-assessment</td><td>Spring fiscal package</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>synthesis-summary, executive-brief, risk-assessment, threat-analysis</td><td>Most politically significant — enacted April 22</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>significance-scoring, threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>NATO deployment Finland</td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Proposition</td><td>threat-analysis, risk-assessment, classification-results</td><td>Criminal deportation — ECHR risk</td></tr><tr><td>SfU18</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives, classification-results</td><td>39 opposition reservations</td></tr><tr><td>SoU16</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>20 opposition reservations</td></tr><tr><td>SoU17</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>threat-analysis, stakeholder-perspectives, classification-results</td><td>KD-SD healthcare fracture</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives, threat-analysis, synthesis-summary</td><td>SD challenges M (demonstrations)</td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives, threat-analysis, significance-scoring</td><td>S accountability offensive</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Proposition</td><td>classification-results, implementation-feasibility</td><td>Electricity market</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Proposition</td><td>classification-results, stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>Ukraine tribunal</td></tr><tr><td>HD01KU32</td><td>KU report</td><td>classification-results</td><td>Constitutional amendment — vilande</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19">Thematic Continuity — Prior Monthly Review (Apr 19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19">Thematic Continuity — Prior Monthly Review (Apr 19)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3692,11 +3692,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-thematic-continuity--prior-monthly-review-apr-19">Thematic Continuity
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR from Apr 19 monthly-review</th><th>April 23 status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-2: Spring budget outcome — will FiU48 pass?</td><td><strong>RESOLVED</strong> — Yes, passed April 22 with M+SD+S+KD</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3: SD-KD healthcare fracture — how far?</td><td><strong>ONGOING</strong> — SoU17 R15 confirms KD-SD fracture; not yet escalated to government crisis</td><td>SoU17 reservation R15</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4: NATO deployment confirmation</td><td><strong>CONFIRMED</strong> — UFöU3 before Chamber for decision June 4</td><td>UFöU3 riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7: Energy reform pace</td><td><strong>PROGRESSING</strong> — HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239 in committee</td><td>Energy committee bills</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Framework</strong>: ICD 203 audit + SAT catalog + osint-tradecraft-standards.md</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3754,7 +3754,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 Audit (9 Standards)<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 Standard</th><th>Applied?</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Proper sourcing</td><td>✅</td><td>All claims cite dok_id, riksdagen.se URLs, or named primary sources</td></tr><tr><td>2. Uncertainty expression (WEP)</td><td>✅</td><td>"Highly likely", "Likely", "Unlikely", "Almost certain" used throughout</td></tr><tr><td>3. Appropriate confidence</td><td>✅</td><td>Admiralty codes [A1]–[C3] applied per evidence quality</td></tr><tr><td>4. Alternative hypotheses</td><td>✅</td><td>devils-advocate.md: 3 competing hypotheses with ACH matrix</td></tr><tr><td>5. Distinguish fact from judgment</td><td>✅</td><td>Factual claims (enacted, vote count) separated from analytical judgments</td></tr><tr><td>6. Identify information gaps</td><td>✅</td><td>Gap: ECHR timeline on HD03235; Gap: SD's internal coalition strategy</td></tr><tr><td>7. Analytic tradecraft</td><td>✅</td><td>F3EAD model applied; attack tree; coalition mathematics</td></tr><tr><td>8. Avoid mirror imaging</td><td>✅</td><td>Considered SD's genuine policy dispute interpretation (H3 refinement)</td></tr><tr><td>9. Consistent with available data</td><td>✅</td><td>World Bank economic data, MCP download confirmed before analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-applied-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3840,18 +3840,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-applied-10">SAT Techniques Applied (≥10)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>SAT Technique</th><th>Applied in</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td><td>3 hypotheses, 8 evidence items</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Devil's Advocacy</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td><td>Counter-arguments for all 3 hypotheses</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>Full SWOT + TOWS matrix</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Scenario Analysis</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>4 scenarios summing to 100%</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Red Team Analysis</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td><td>Attack tree + TTP mapping</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>PESTLE Analysis</td><td>classification-results.md + comparative-international.md</td><td>Political, Economic, Social, Technical, Legal dimensions</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Stakeholder Analysis</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td><td>6-lens matrix</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Historical Analogies</td><td>historical-parallels.md</td><td>≥2 named precedents</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Coalition Mathematics</td><td>coalition-mathematics.md</td><td>Seat-count table with vote distributions</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Forward Indicators / Signposts</td><td>forward-indicators.md</td><td>≥10 dated indicators across 4 horizons</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md §KJ</td><td>Checked: SD fracture, ECHR timeline, S polling</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Confidence Calibration</td><td>All assessments</td><td>Admiralty [A1]–[C3] per evidence base</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs">Methodology Improvements for Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation">Improvement 1: Early MCP Data Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs">Methodology Improvements for Future Runs<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-future-runs"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation">Improvement 1: Early MCP Data Validation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-early-mcp-data-validation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue observed</strong>: Data download relied on meta-summaries from sibling folders; direct MCP queries for April 20–23 documents were not comprehensively executed.
 <strong>Improvement</strong>: Future monthly-review runs should explicitly query <code>search_dokument</code> with <code>from_date: "$PERIOD_END - 7 days"</code> to ensure the most recent period (which most prior runs have not covered) is fully downloaded.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking">Improvement 2: Automated PIR Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking">Improvement 2: Automated PIR Tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-automated-pir-tracking"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue observed</strong>: Prior-cycle PIR resolution required manual reading of April 19 monthly-review <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>. This is error-prone and time-consuming.
 <strong>Improvement</strong>: Implement a <code>pir-tracking.md</code> artifact in each monthly-review folder that is machine-readable. Each run should parse the prior cycle's file and auto-populate the "Carried-forward PIRs" table.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation">Improvement 3: Coalition Mathematics Automation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation">Improvement 3: Coalition Mathematics Automation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-coalition-mathematics-automation"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue observed</strong>: Seat counts for Mermaid diagrams required manual tallying against 349-seat Riksdag.
 <strong>Improvement</strong>: Create a <code>scripts/coalition-calculator.ts</code> script that accepts a list of parties and their current seat counts (from riksdag-regering MCP ledamöter statistics) and outputs both a seat-count table and Mermaid gantt chart. This would be reusable across all monthly, weekly, and election workflows.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-information-gaps-identified">Information Gaps Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps-identified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-gaps-identified">Information Gaps Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps-identified"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3889,7 +3889,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-gaps-identified">Information Gaps Identified<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gap</th><th>Impact</th><th>PIR?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ECHR filing status for HD03235</td><td>HIGH — if filed, changes risk assessment</td><td>PIR-4</td></tr><tr><td>SD's internal coalition strategy document</td><td>HIGH — separates theater from real fracture</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Autumn budget healthcare allocation</td><td>MEDIUM — determines KD fracture escalation</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td>S's September election target seat count</td><td>MEDIUM — determines interpellation strategy</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>MP polling impact from FiU48 energy vote</td><td>LOW — cross-coalition energy cooperation may affect Green vote</td><td>No</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-standards-met">Tradecraft Standards Met<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-standards-met"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-standards-met">Tradecraft Standards Met<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-standards-met"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Offentlighetsprincipen</strong>: All sources public — riksdagen.se, regeringen.se, World Bank open data</li>
 <li><strong>GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)</strong>: Political opinions referenced only where publicly made by MPs in official capacity</li>
@@ -3897,7 +3897,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tradecraft-standards-met">Tradecraft Standards Met<a class="" aria-hi
 <li><strong>Data minimisation</strong>: No private contact information, personal health data, or non-public communications referenced</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-monthly-review
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24810587515
 <strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-23T00:58:00Z
@@ -3907,7 +3907,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>MCP servers</strong>: riksdag-regering [LIVE], scb [N/A], world-bank [LIVE]
 <strong>Analysis mode</strong>: Run 1 — Analysis only</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses Ingested (Tier-C cross-type synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference Analyses Ingested (Tier-C cross-type synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3999,7 +3999,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-reference-analyses-ingested-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Reference An
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Subfolder</th><th>Synthesis Summary</th><th>Key PIRs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>propositions</td><td>Pre-election security/defence/immigration batch</td><td>Security legislation, Tidö delivery</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>Healthcare/social insurance battleground</td><td>SD-KD healthcare dissent</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>interpellations</td><td>S-dominated infrastructure accountability</td><td>Carlson (KD) targeting</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-01</td><td>motions</td><td>Education, housing, welfare themes</td><td>MP/V/S policy positions</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-02</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>Defence/security/healthcare reports</td><td>NATO, FöU12, SoU reforms</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td>propositions</td><td>Spring fiscal package (Prop. 100/99/236)</td><td>Pre-election fiscal framing</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>FiU48 emergency budget, UFöU3 NATO Finland</td><td>Election-year fiscal/defence</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-14</td><td>evening-analysis</td><td>8-proposition legislative blitz</td><td>Energy triptych, police</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-15</td><td>committeeReports</td><td>Transport Committee digital/cyber/port reforms</td><td>TU21 e-ID, TU17 anti-fraud</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-19</td><td>monthly-review</td><td>March 20–April 19 review</td><td>Spring budget PIRs</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-21</td><td>evening-analysis</td><td>Fuel tax election gamble, constitutional hearings</td><td>FiU48 pre-decision</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>evening-analysis</td><td>HD01FiU48 enacted, M+SD+S+KD supermajority</td><td>Post-vote dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>2026-04-22</td><td>propositions</td><td>Vårproposition 2026, energy laws</td><td>Svantesson fiscal narrative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-documents-primary-sources">Key Documents (Primary Sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-primary-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-documents-primary-sources">Key Documents (Primary Sources)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-documents-primary-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4232,7 +4232,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-documents-primary-sources">Key Documents (Primary Sources)<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Date</th><th>Committee</th><th>Full-text</th><th>Source URL</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026 (Prop. 2025/26:100)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03100.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026 (Prop. 2025/26:99)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD0399.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD0399.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra Ändringsbudget — bränsle/el/gas (Prop. 2025/26:236)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03236.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03236.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Betänkande FiU48 — Extra ändringsbudget beslut</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>FiU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU48.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet (Prop. 2025/26:240)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>TU/NU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03240.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny miljöprövningsmyndighet (Prop. 2025/26:238)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>MJU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03238.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03238.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner (Prop. 2025/26:239)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>NU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03239.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03239.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03228</td><td>Modernt regelverk för krigsmateriel (Prop. 2024/25:228)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>UU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03228.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03228.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03214</td><td>Stärkt nationellt cybersäkerhetscenter (Prop. 2025/26:214)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>FöU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03214.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03214.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03235</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SfU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03235.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning (Prop. 2025/26:237)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>JuU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03237.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03237.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt och hållbart skogsbruk (Prop. 2025/26:242)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>MJU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03242.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03242.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraina aggressionstribunal (Prop. 2025/26:231)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>UU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03231.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraina skadeståndskommission (Prop. 2025/26:232)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>UU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03232.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3</td><td>NATO Finland deployment (UFöU3)</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>UFöU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UF%C3%B6U3.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/UFöU3.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU18</td><td>SfU18 — Sjukförsäkring (39 reservations)</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SfU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU18.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU16</td><td>SoU16 — Hälso- och sjukvård (20 reservations)</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU16.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU16.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU17</td><td>SoU17 — SD-KD coalition fracture</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SoU17.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU21</td><td>TU21 — Statlig e-legitimation</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>TU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU21.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU21.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD01TU17</td><td>TU17 — Åtgärder mot telekombedrägeri</td><td>Betänkande</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>TU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU17.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01TU17.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>IP: SD vs Strömmer (M) — demonstrationsrätt</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>JuU</td><td>metadata-only</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10429.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>IP: S vs Svantesson (M) — ätstörningsvård</td><td>Interpellation</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td>SoU</td><td>metadata-only</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10442.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03216</td><td>Stärkt medicinsk kompetens kommunal vård (Prop. 2025/26:216)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>2026-04-01</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03216.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03216.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Nationell strategi mot våld mot kvinnor (Skr. 2025/26:245)</td><td>Skrivelse</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>SoU</td><td>Yes</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03245.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03245.html</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-economic-data-sources">Economic Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-economic-data-sources">Economic Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-economic-data-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4282,11 +4282,44 @@ <h2 id="rm-economic-data-sources">Economic Data Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Value</th><th>Year</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>GDP Growth (SE)</td><td>0.82%</td><td>2024</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>GDP Growth (SE)</td><td>-0.20%</td><td>2023</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Unemployment (SE)</td><td>8.69%</td><td>2025</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Unemployment (SE)</td><td>8.40%</td><td>2024</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Inflation CPI (SE)</td><td>2.84%</td><td>2024</td></tr><tr><td>World Bank</td><td>Inflation CPI (SE)</td><td>8.55%</td><td>2023</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering: LIVE — all tools responsive, <code>get_sync_status</code> confirmed at 2026-04-23T00:55:40Z</li>
 <li>world-bank: LIVE — economic data retrieved successfully</li>
 <li>scb: Not queried (monthly review uses cross-type synthesis from sibling analysis)</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU48-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU18-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD03235-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03235-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10429-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10429-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/HD10442-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10442-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/documents/UF%C3%B6U3-analysis.md"><code>documents/UFöU3-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -4340,7 +4373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:10.550Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:32.033Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html b/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html
index 075f0f8eb3..7bd4f2a3e7 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.753Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.227Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.753Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.227Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of","description":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 April 2026 challenging the government's extra supplementary budget (prop. 2025/26:236), deportation law reform (prop.","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:10.753Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024077-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of","description":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 April 2026 challenging the government's extra supplementary budget (prop. 2025/26:236), deportation law reform (prop.","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:32.227Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024077-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,19 +216,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 April 2026 challenging the government's extra supplementary budget (prop. 2025/26:236), deportation law reform (prop. 2025/26:235), new arms export framework (prop. 2025/26:228), and new asylum reception law (prop. 2025/26:229). The sharpest cleavage is over the government's temporary fuel tax cut to EU minimum levels: S, V, and MP all oppose it but for divergent reasons, signalling that the centre-left opposition cannot coalesce behind a single counter-proposal ahead of the autumn 2026 election.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Media &#x26; editorial framing</strong>: Determine whether the energy/budget dispute should lead as a "fiscal credibility" or "climate policy" story — evidence below supports both framings simultaneously.</li>
 <li><strong>Election intelligence</strong>: Assess whether opposition fragmentation on fiscal and migration issues reduces the probability of a left-of-centre government change in autumn 2026.</li>
 <li><strong>Policy monitoring</strong>: Track which committee (FiU for budget, SfU for migration) will process motions first and when votes are scheduled.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Budget clash</strong>: S wants better-targeted electricity support and flexible use of grid-congestion revenues (HD024082 by Mikael Damberg). V demands the entire fuel tax cut be rejected — cites RUT analysis showing government reforms benefiting top half of income distribution 5× more than the bottom half (HD024092, Nooshi Dadgostar). MP likewise opposes fuel cut; cites Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, and Trafikverket as opposing the proposal (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson).</li>
 <li><strong>Deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235)</strong>: V demands full rejection of stricter deportation rules (HD024090, Tony Haddou); C accepts with conditions requiring systematic repeat offences (HD024095, Niels Paarup-Petersen); MP partial rejection (HD024097, Annika Hirvonen).</li>
@@ -237,10 +237,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Opposition fragmentation</strong>: S, V, and MP oppose the budget supplementary but cannot unite on a common alternative. On migration, the centre-left bloc is even more fractured, with C partly supporting the government.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔭 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔭 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>FiU committee vote on Extra ändringsbudget (prop. 2025/26:236)</strong> — expected within 3–4 weeks. If SD votes with the government as expected, the fuel tax cut will pass. Watch for any SD amendment demands as a pivotal indicator of coalition stability.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-ranking-diw-weighted">📊 Significance Ranking (DIW weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-ranking-diw-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-ranking-diw-weighted">📊 Significance Ranking (DIW weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-ranking-diw-weighted"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Opposition Motion Significance vs Electoral Impact
@@ -258,12 +258,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-ranking-diw-weighted">📊 Significance Ranking (DIW we
     HD024098 MP-Budget: [0.70, 0.78]</pre>
 <p><em>Confidence: HIGH overall [B2]; individual document scores reflect manifest data + full text where available.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc">Lead Story: Energy-Climate Fault Line Fractures Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc">Lead Story: Energy-Climate Fault Line Fractures Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc"></a></h3>
 <p>The week of 13–17 April 2026 produced the spring session's most revealing clash of opposition values: three parties — Socialdemokraterna (S), Vänsterpartiet (V), and Miljöpartiet (MP) — all oppose the government's extra supplementary budget for 2026 (prop. 2025/26:236) but cannot agree on a common alternative. S demands better-designed electricity support and more flexible use of grid-congestion (flaskhals) revenues (dok_id: HD024082, Mikael Damberg m.fl.). V invokes a RUT distributional analysis showing the government's mandate-period reforms have benefited the top income half 5× more than the bottom half, and demands the fuel tax cut be rejected outright (HD024092, Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl.). MP cites a coalition of expert agencies — Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Trafikverket — as opposing the fuel tax reduction on climate and investment-certainty grounds (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson m.fl.).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking">DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking">DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -367,25 +367,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking">DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>Submitter</th><th>DIW</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — elstöd</td><td>Damberg (S)</td><td>0.89</td><td>P1 — Lead story</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — avslå bränsle</td><td>Dadgostar (V)</td><td>0.83</td><td>P1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024090</td><td>Utvisning — avslå proposition</td><td>Haddou (V)</td><td>0.80</td><td>P1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fel väg</td><td>Alm Ericson (MP)</td><td>0.78</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024096</td><td>Krigsmateriel — exportförbud</td><td>Risberg (MP)</td><td>0.75</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024089</td><td>Mottagandelag — kommuners rätt</td><td>Paarup-Petersen (C)</td><td>0.70</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>Utvisning — systematiska brott</td><td>Paarup-Petersen (C)</td><td>0.65</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024097</td><td>Utvisning — partiellt avslag</td><td>Hirvonen (MP)</td><td>0.62</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024087</td><td>Mottagandelag — avslå</td><td>Hirvonen (MP)</td><td>0.58</td><td>P3</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024080</td><td>Mottagandelag — privatisering</td><td>Karkiainen (S)</td><td>0.55</td><td>P3</td></tr><tr><td>11–14</td><td>HD024079/077/086/091</td><td>Bosättning/Mottagande/Krigsmateriel</td><td>S/V/MP</td><td>0.40–0.50</td><td>P3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>Three interlocking policy battles define this week's opposition motions:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction">1. Fiscal-Energy Battle (FiU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction">1. Fiscal-Energy Battle (FiU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction"></a></h4>
 <p>The government's Extra ändringsbudget (prop. 2025/26:236) proposes: (a) temporary fuel tax reduction to EU energy directive minimum 1 May–30 Sep 2026 and (b) 3.4 billion SEK in electricity support (1 bn previously allocated + 2.4 bn new). <strong>S</strong> (HD024082) does not oppose the electricity support amount but criticises its design — approximately 800,000 households in housing cooperatives with shared electricity contracts will not qualify. S demands the government return with proposals for targeted, equitable electricity support and for more flexible use of grid-congestion revenues. <strong>V</strong> (HD024092) goes further: rejects the fuel tax cut entirely, cites RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158 and 2025:1607) showing regressive distributional effects, and argues climate transition requirements override short-term relief. <strong>MP</strong> (HD024098) aligns with V on the fuel tax but grounds the argument in expert agency consensus — the proposal "risks deepening Sweden's fossil fuel dependency."</p>
 <p>Intelligence assessment: The fuel tax cut is likely to pass (SD will vote with government), but the opposition's fragmented response reflects a deeper strategic disagreement about whether to fight the government on fiscal credibility (S's approach), distributional justice (V), or climate integrity (MP). This fragmentation is a structural vulnerability ahead of 2026 elections.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction">2. Migration/Crime Nexus (SfU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction">2. Migration/Crime Nexus (SfU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Prop. 2025/26:235</strong> (stricter deportation): Would lower threshold so any sentence stricter than a fine is deportation-eligible; remove protection for those who arrived before age 15; require prosecutors to seek deportation in all eligible cases; and ignore enforcement barriers at the general courts stage. Both <strong>Lagrådet</strong> (the Council on Legislation) and numerous remiss bodies opposed the reforms. V (HD024090) demands full rejection. C (HD024095) accepts deportation in principle but wants systematic repeated offences to be required, not single incidents. MP (HD024097) partly rejects — supports some changes (aggravated assault provisions, 8 kap. 1 §) but not the broad lowering of the threshold.</p>
 <p><strong>Prop. 2025/26:229</strong> (new reception law/Mottagandelag): Would centralise asylum housing; the government takes over full responsibility from municipalities. C (HD024089) broadly supports the framework but opposes: (a) removing municipalities' right to give emergency welfare assistance and (b) "areas restrictions" (områdespolicies). S (HD024080) opposes privatisation of asylum housing. MP (HD024087) rejects the entire proposition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction">3. Arms Export Regulation (UU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction">3. Arms Export Regulation (UU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Prop. 2025/26:228</strong> (new krigsmateriel framework): MP (HD024096) demands: (1) a complete ban on arms exports to dictatorships, warring nations, and major human rights violators; (2) mandatory consideration of third-country diversion risk; (3) rejection of the new secrecy provisions on software/technology (citing Lagrådet criticism). V (HD024091) opposes the entire proposition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Title</strong>: "Split Opposition Challenges Sweden's Fuel-Tax Budget and Deportation Laws"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description</strong>: "Sweden's Social Democrats, Left Party and Greens all oppose the government's fuel tax cut — but offer incompatible alternatives, revealing a fractured opposition ahead of autumn 2026 elections."</li>
 <li><strong>Keywords</strong>: Swedish parliament, Riksdag motions, fuel tax, deportation law, arms exports, 2026 election</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map">Mermaid: Policy Battle Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map">Mermaid: Policy Battle Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
     subgraph Budget["💰 Extra Ändringsbudget (FiU)"]
         B1["HD024082 S\nBättre elstöd"]:::party_s
@@ -417,27 +417,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map">Mermaid: Policy Battle Map<a class="" aria
     style Migration fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
     style Arms fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-1 (Governmental stability), PIR-3 (Policy reform trajectory), PIR-5 (Electoral dynamics)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story">Key Judgment KJ-1: Opposition Fragmentation is the Dominant Political Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story">Key Judgment KJ-1: Opposition Fragmentation is the Dominant Political Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The most significant intelligence output from this week's motions is not any individual policy clash but the structural fragmentation of the centre-left opposition. S (HD024082), V (HD024092), and MP (HD024098) all oppose the same government proposition (2025/26:236) but cannot agree on a common alternative. This fragmentation is observable, documented, and structurally persistent — reflecting genuine policy disagreements about the relative priority of distributional justice (V), environmental protection (MP), and fiscal competence (S). The pattern is likely to persist through the 2026 election campaign.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: Three separate motion documents, no joint sponsors, no shared analytical framework. Cited sources: HD024082 (riksdagen.se), HD024092 (riksdagen.se), HD024098 (riksdagen.se). [B1] Admiralty code.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated">Key Judgment KJ-2: Government's Legislative Program is Expert-Isolated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated">Key Judgment KJ-2: Government's Legislative Program is Expert-Isolated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The government faces unprecedented expert agency opposition to its supplementary budget: Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet, and Trafikverket all opposed the fuel tax reduction in remiss (cited in HD024098). Simultaneously, Lagrådet explicitly advised against the deportation law (cited in HD024090). This double expert-isolation — on fiscal and legal dimensions simultaneously — is a significant indicator of reduced policy quality and increased implementation risk.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: Five agencies cited by name in HD024098 [A2]; Lagrådet rejection cited in HD024090 [A1]. Independent confirmation from multiple institutional sources.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground">Key Judgment KJ-3: Migration Policy Arena is the Key 2026 Electoral Battleground<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground">Key Judgment KJ-3: Migration Policy Arena is the Key 2026 Electoral Battleground<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The week's migration motions (HD024089, HD024090, HD024095, HD024097, HD024080, HD024079, HD024077, HD024086) reveal that C occupies the most strategically exposed position: broadly accepting both the deportation framework and the Mottagandelag while opposing specific elements. This makes C a plausible coalition partner for either a right-wing or centre-left government in 2026 — and therefore a pivotal swing actor whose final positioning will be decisive.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD024089 (C accepting Mottagandelag broadly); HD024095 (C accepting deportation framework conditionally). [B1] Admiralty. PIR-3 handoff: track C's final vote on SfU committee reports.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle">PIR Handoff for Next Intelligence Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle">PIR Handoff for Next Intelligence Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1 (Government stability)</strong>: Monitor SD's FiU vote on prop. 2025/26:236. Any SD amendment demands = first crack in coalition.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-3 (Policy reform)</strong>: Track FiU and SfU committee dates. If FiU fast-tracks before May 15, opposition loses deliberation window.</li>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle">PIR Handoff for Next Intelli
 <li><strong>EEI</strong>: Watch for any joint S/V/MP press statement on energy (would signal H1 coordination thesis); watch for constitutional complaint filing after deportation law passes.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -478,9 +478,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Risk if wrong</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SD will vote with government on all four propositions</td><td>HIGH confidence</td><td>If wrong: major coalition crisis</td></tr><tr><td>C will vote with government on migration but not energy</td><td>MEDIUM confidence</td><td>If C abstains on energy, slight chance of budget modification</td></tr><tr><td>No joint S/V/MP opposition motion filed</td><td>HIGH confidence (documented)</td><td>If a joint addendum appears, thesis changes</td></tr><tr><td>Courts will not issue interim stay on deportation law</td><td>HIGH confidence short-term</td><td>If ECtHR acts unusually fast, scenario 3 activated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Depth</th><th>Intelligence</th><th>Width</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024082 (S)</td><td>0.92</td><td>0.88</td><td>0.87</td><td><strong>0.89</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024092 (V)</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.80</td><td><strong>0.83</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024090 (V)</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.81</td><td>0.77</td><td><strong>0.80</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024098 (MP)</td><td>0.80</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.76</td><td><strong>0.78</strong></td><td>P2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024096 (MP)</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.72</td><td><strong>0.75</strong></td><td>P2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024089 (C)</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.70</td><td>0.68</td><td><strong>0.70</strong></td><td>P2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095 (C)</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.65</td><td>0.62</td><td><strong>0.65</strong></td><td>P2 — Medium</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024097 (MP)</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.63</td><td>0.60</td><td><strong>0.62</strong></td><td>P2 — Medium</td></tr><tr><td>9–14</td><td>Cluster (low-weight)</td><td>0.40–0.55</td><td>0.40–0.50</td><td>0.42–0.52</td><td><strong>0.40–0.55</strong></td><td>P3 — Standard</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>DIW = Depth × Intelligence × Width (normalised 0–1)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-items-with-evidence">Ranked Items with Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-items-with-evidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-items-with-evidence">Ranked Items with Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-items-with-evidence"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD024082</strong> — S motion on Extra ändringsbudget: Mikael Damberg och Socialdemokraterna kräver ett rättvisare elstöd för 800,000 bostadsrättsinnehavare som exkluderats av regeringens design. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] <code>[B2]</code> IMPACT: HIGH — defines S budget profile pre-election.</p>
@@ -601,13 +601,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-items-with-evidence">Ranked Items with Evidence<a class="" ari
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Downside risk</strong>: If FiU adds conditions making the fuel tax cut contingent on SD support for other measures, the entire budget picture shifts.</li>
 <li><strong>Upside</strong>: If the Mottagandelag passes with C support but faces constitutional review, the judicial dimension adds a new policy layer.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d", "textColor": "#e0e0e0"}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Scores — 2026-04-23 Motions"
@@ -617,21 +617,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram
     line [0.89, 0.83, 0.80, 0.78, 0.75, 0.70, 0.65, 0.62]</pre>
 <p><em>Sources: riksdagen.se document metadata + full-text analysis. Admiralty [B2] for document-derived scores; [A2] for multi-agency corroborated items.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice">Primary Frame War: "Relief" vs. "Justice"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice">Primary Frame War: "Relief" vs. "Justice"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant narrative battle this week is between the government's "relief" frame and the opposition's "justice" frame:</p>
 <p><strong>Government frame (Tidö)</strong>: The supplementary budget provides immediate energy price relief to Swedish households during a difficult economic period. The fuel tax cut is a targeted, temporary measure to help families who depend on their cars.</p>
 <p><strong>V/MP counter-frame (HD024092, HD024098)</strong>: The relief is mis-targeted — it benefits high-income households disproportionately. The five expert agencies said the measure is economically inefficient and climate-damaging. Technical competence arguments.</p>
 <p><strong>S counter-frame (HD024082)</strong>: The relief has design flaws — 800,000 cooperative housing households are excluded. S offers better design, not rejection of relief.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: The government's "relief" frame is emotionally simpler and will likely dominate media coverage. The opposition's counter-frames require voters to process distributional data (V) or engage with design complexity (S). In a pre-election environment, simple beats complex.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence">Secondary Frame: "Rule of Law" vs. "Deterrence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence">Secondary Frame: "Rule of Law" vs. "Deterrence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>V/MP frame (HD024090)</strong>: The deportation law is unconstitutional, legally incoherent, and Lagrådet-rejected. "Rättssäkerheten" (rule of law) is under attack.</p>
 <p><strong>C frame (HD024095)</strong>: Conditional acceptance: the framework is legitimate but must include procedural safeguards. "Proportionality."</p>
 <p><strong>SD/M frame (absent from motions — expected government position)</strong>: "Deterrence works. We need firm signals to prevent migration."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-media-amplification-probability">Media Amplification Probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-amplification-probability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-media-amplification-probability">Media Amplification Probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-amplification-probability"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -669,14 +669,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-media-amplification-probability">Media Amplification Probability<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Topic</th><th>Predicted amplification</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S's design-flaw argument (HD024082)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>800,000 households = concrete, large, sympathetic group</td></tr><tr><td>V's RUT distributional analysis (HD024092)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Requires some media sophistication to convey</td></tr><tr><td>MP's five-agency citation (HD024098)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Expert opinion always amplifiable; threshold risk angle also newsworthy</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet rejection of deportation law (HD024090)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Institutional conflict = classic news story</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export ban motion (HD024096)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Less immediate relevance to domestic agenda</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-social-media-hypothesis">Social Media Hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-hypothesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-social-media-hypothesis">Social Media Hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-hypothesis"></a></h3>
 <p>On platforms prioritising emotional resonance (Instagram, TikTok), the "800,000 households excluded" narrative (S) and "Lagrådet says it's illegal" narrative (V/MP) are the most shareable. The distributional data in V's motion requires more text than a social post allows.</p>
 <p><em>Note: No social media monitoring data available. Assessment is structural inference from content analysis [C3].</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties">Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties">Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties">Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Actor</th><th>Primary Motion</th><th>Strategic Interest</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S — Socialdemokraterna</td><td>Oppose fuel cut design; demand targeted electricity support</td><td>Mikael Damberg</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Fiscal competence credibility; 2026 election positioning</td></tr><tr><td>V — Vänsterpartiet</td><td>Oppose fuel cut entirely; reject deportation law</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar, Tony Haddou</td><td>HD024092, HD024090</td><td>Distributional justice; human rights base mobilisation</td></tr><tr><td>MP — Miljöpartiet</td><td>Oppose fuel cut on climate; oppose arms export liberalisation</td><td>Janine Alm Ericson, Jacob Risberg, Annika Hirvonen</td><td>HD024098, HD024096, HD024097</td><td>Climate mandate; green voter retention</td></tr><tr><td>C — Centerpartiet</td><td>Conditionally accept deportation and reception frameworks</td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>HD024089, HD024095</td><td>Swing-voter appeal; rural municipal interests</td></tr><tr><td>SD — Sverigedemokraterna</td><td>Expected to support government across all four propositions</td><td>(no motions filed in this cluster)</td><td>—</td><td>Coalition stability; border control narrative</td></tr><tr><td>M, L, KD</td><td>Expected to support government</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Government parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies">Lens 2: Civil Society &#x26; Expert Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies">Lens 2: Civil Society &#x26; Expert Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies">Lens 2: Civil Society &#x26; Exp
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Position</th><th>Basis</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Explicitly advised against prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td><td>Official legal opinion</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Konjunkturinstitutet</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut in remiss</td><td>Climate/economic analysis</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Naturvårdsverket</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Environmental mandate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>2030-sekretariatet</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Climate transition mandate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Statens energimyndighet</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Energy security analysis</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Trafikverket</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Transport sector mandate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Remiss bodies on HD024090</td><td>Extensive criticism of deportation reform</td><td>Rule-of-law analysis</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations">Lens 3: Voters &#x26; Affected Populations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations">Lens 3: Voters &#x26; Affected Populations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations">Lens 3: Voters &#x26; Affected P
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Affected by</th><th>Stakes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>~800,000 bostadsrättsinnehavare with shared electricity</td><td>S motion HD024082 — excluded from electricity support</td><td>SEK hundreds per household per month</td></tr><tr><td>Migrants who arrived in Sweden before age 15</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:235 removes their protection</td><td>Potential deportation risk</td></tr><tr><td>Low-income households</td><td>V motion HD024092 — fuel price relief is proportional to car use and income</td><td>5:1 benefit asymmetry per RUT analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Environment-concerned voters (~25–30% of electorate)</td><td>MP motion HD024098 — climate signal from fuel tax cut</td><td>Long-term fossil fuel dependency</td></tr><tr><td>Asylum seekers and municipalities</td><td>Reception law prop. 2025/26:229</td><td>Municipal welfare, area restrictions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Narrative Agents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Narrative Agents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Narrative Agents
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Promoted by</th><th>Risk for opposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Relief for hard-pressed households"</td><td>Government + friendly media</td><td>Makes opposition seem out of touch</td></tr><tr><td>"Government favours the wealthy"</td><td>V (RUT data)</td><td>Resonant but S hasn't adopted it</td></tr><tr><td>"Climate backslide"</td><td>MP + green media</td><td>True but niche; low penetration in election swing voters</td></tr><tr><td>"Rule of law erosion"</td><td>V + legal NGOs</td><td>Strong for base mobilisation; limited mainstream appeal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-international-actors">Lens 5: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-international-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-international-actors">Lens 5: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-international-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-international-actors">Lens 5: International Actors<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Concern</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>Potential state aid issues with selective electricity support</td><td>General EU energy rules [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>Arms recipient states</td><td>Stricter Swedish export controls (MP demands) would restrict flows</td><td>HD024096 — explicit demand for export bans [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>UNHCR / EU migration agencies</td><td>Stricter deportation thresholds and new reception framework</td><td>HD024090, HD024089 [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-institutional-actors">Lens 6: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-institutional-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-institutional-actors">Lens 6: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-institutional-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-institutional-actors">Lens 6: Institutional Actors<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Interest</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU (Finansutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024082, HD024092, HD024098</td><td>Budget supplementary vote timing</td></tr><tr><td>SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024089–090, 095, 097, 076, 080</td><td>Migration reform timeline</td></tr><tr><td>UU (Utrikesutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024096, HD024091</td><td>Arms export framework</td></tr><tr><td>AU (Arbetsmarknadsutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024079, 077, 086</td><td>Labour/housing reception motions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 graph LR
     Lagrådet["Lagrådet\n[A1]"]:::authority --> V_Dep["V Motion\nHD024090"]:::party_v
@@ -939,93 +939,93 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     classDef evidence fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     classDef committee fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0,stroke:#ff006e</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>This file tracks 12 dated indicators across 4 horizons (30-day, 90-day, 6-month, 12-month) that would confirm or refute the key judgments in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026">Horizon 1: 30-Day Indicators (May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax">IND-01: FiU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026">Horizon 1: 30-Day Indicators (May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax">IND-01: FiU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: ~May 5, 2026 (FiU scheduled)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Does FiU adopt S's design amendment (HD024082)? Yes = KJ-1 partially refuted (opposition succeeded). No = KJ-1 confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Trigger threshold</strong>: Any S, V, or MP amendment adopted by FiU majority</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A2] that vote will occur; MEDIUM [B2] that government amendments will prevail</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice">IND-02: Skatteverket Implementation Notice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice">IND-02: Skatteverket Implementation Notice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: ~May 1, 2026 (law comes into force)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Does official implementation guidance include or exclude cooperative housing (<em>bostadsrättsföreningar</em>)? Exclusion confirmed = HD024082 validated; political cost to government elevated.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that notice will be published</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law">IND-03: SfU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law">IND-03: SfU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: ~May 12, 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Does SfU include any C amendments? C amendment adopted = coalition complexity signal.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that vote will occur</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026">Horizon 2: 90-Day Indicators (June–July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law">IND-04: First Deportation Under New Law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026">Horizon 2: 90-Day Indicators (June–July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law">IND-04: First Deportation Under New Law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: June–July 2026 (Migrationsverket implementation)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Is the first deportation case published? Does it produce a court challenge?</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2] that early cases will be filed quickly</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold">IND-05: MP Poll Result (4% threshold)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold">IND-05: MP Poll Result (4% threshold)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Any major poll, June–July 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: MP at/above 4% = electoral calculation shifts. MP below 4% = coalition arithmetic for S+V more difficult.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that polls will be published; threshold outcome is MEDIUM [C3]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement">IND-06: S+V+MP Joint Election Platform Statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement">IND-06: S+V+MP Joint Election Platform Statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: June 2026 (traditional alliance-building period)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: A joint platform on energy would refute H1 (fragmentation is strategic differentiation) and confirm H1-alt (genuine coordination).</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B3] that some form of coordination statement emerges; quality uncertain</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026">Horizon 3: 6-Month Indicators (September–October 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend">IND-07: 2026 Election Polling Trend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026">Horizon 3: 6-Month Indicators (September–October 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend">IND-07: 2026 Election Polling Trend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Ongoing, key snapshot September 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: If government coalition (M+SD+KD+L) polling above 175 seats → KJ-1 (fragmentation = government advantage) confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that polls will be published</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration">IND-08: C's Final Alliance Declaration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration">IND-08: C's Final Alliance Declaration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: C autumn congress, September 2026 (est.)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: C declares coalition preference. C → left = major political realignment. C → right = status quo confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2] that C will clarify before election campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development">IND-09: Arms Export Policy Development<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development">IND-09: Arms Export Policy Development<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Summer/autumn 2026 (Riksdag follows up HD024096)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Any governmental communication on arms export secrecy provisions (opposed by MP in HD024096). Government concession = small HD024096 victory.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: LOW [C3]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027">Horizon 4: 12-Month Indicators (Spring 2027)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration">IND-10: ECtHR Case Registration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027">Horizon 4: 12-Month Indicators (Spring 2027)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration">IND-10: ECtHR Case Registration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Autumn 2026–Spring 2027 (cases filed after law implementation)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: ECtHR registers case against Sweden under ECHR Art. 8 related to prop. 2025/26:235. Registration = medium-term legal risk elevated (KJ-2 confirmed on legal dimension).</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report">IND-11: Migrationsverket Capacity Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report">IND-11: Migrationsverket Capacity Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Q1 2027 (annual report)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Migrationsverket reports implementation difficulties with new Mottagandelagen. Friction confirmed = C's HD024089 concerns validated.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B3]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations">IND-12: Post-Election Coalition Negotiations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations">IND-12: Post-Election Coalition Negotiations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: September–November 2026 (post-election)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Who negotiates with whom? If S+C talks emerge seriously, KJ-3 (C as pivotal actor) fully confirmed. If Tidö 2.0 forms without modification, KJ-1 (fragmentation cost opposition the election) confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that negotiations will occur</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-summary-matrix">Indicator Summary Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-summary-matrix">Indicator Summary Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark"}}%%
 gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -1047,29 +1047,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-summary-matrix">Indicator Summary Matrix<a class="" aria-hi
     IND-11 Migrationsverket rpt :milestone, 2027-02-01, 0d
     IND-12 Coalition talks      :2026-10-01, 60d</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome">Scenarios for Spring 2026 Parliamentary Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely">Scenario 1: Government Wins All Four Propositions (Most Likely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome">Scenarios for Spring 2026 Parliamentary Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely">Scenario 1: Government Wins All Four Propositions (Most Likely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 65% [C2]<br>
 <strong>Narrative</strong>: SD and the four-party government coalition pass prop. 2025/26:235, 236, 228, and 229 intact. Opposition motions (HD024082–098, HD024090–097, HD024096, HD024089–091) are voted down in committee and plenary. The fuel tax cut takes effect 1 May 2026. Deportation rules tighten 1 September 2026.<br>
 <strong>Why likely</strong>: SD has been reliable since the Tidö agreement; no by-election pressure; C partially supporting migration proposals.<br>
 <strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Monitor FiU committee vote date (est. late April/early May 2026). If S/V/MP cannot coordinate to delay, Scenario 1 is confirmed.<br>
 <strong>Impact on opposition</strong>: Deepens fragmentation narrative; V/MP locked into protest stance; S under pressure to differentiate from V.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible">Scenario 2: Budget Propositions Modified — C Demands Concessions (Plausible)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible">Scenario 2: Budget Propositions Modified — C Demands Concessions (Plausible)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 22% [C3]<br>
 <strong>Narrative</strong>: C leverages its SfU position to demand changes to the Mottagandelag area-restriction provisions (HD024089) in exchange for abstention on the fuel tax supplementary. Government makes minor concessions. S, V, MP motions still voted down. Electricity support design is tweaked but 800k cooperative households remain partially excluded.<br>
 <strong>Why plausible</strong>: C has a track record of extracting symbolic wins on migration (see 2023 Tidö addendum). Niels Paarup-Petersen's motion (HD024089) is specifically calibrated to be acceptable as a negotiating position.<br>
 <strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Any informal contact between C leadership and government whips in the two weeks before FiU vote.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Partial vindication for C; S/V/MP still lose but narrative shifts to "C saves municipal welfare."</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact">Scenario 3: Lagrådet Rejection Creates Constitutional Crisis on Deportation Law (Low probability, High impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact">Scenario 3: Lagrådet Rejection Creates Constitutional Crisis on Deportation Law (Low probability, High impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 13% [D3]<br>
 <strong>Narrative</strong>: After prop. 2025/26:235 passes, an immediate constitutional challenge is mounted by legal NGOs citing Lagrådet's opinion. The Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) issues an interim stay on the deportation expansion for those who arrived before age 15. Government embarrassed; V (HD024090, Tony Haddou) vindicated. This delays implementation beyond the September 2026 target and becomes a major election issue.<br>
 <strong>Why low probability</strong>: Courts rarely issue interim stays on legislation; Lagrådet opinions are advisory, not binding. But the specific removal of childhood-arrival protections is a ECHR Art. 8 (family life) flashpoint.<br>
 <strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Filing of a formal constitutional complaint within 30 days of the law passing (est. August 2026); any ECHR provisional measures request.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Severely damages government credibility on rule of law; boosts V/MP in polls; S gains from not opposing in the same extreme terms.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 pie title Scenario Probability Distribution — Spring 2026 Legislative Outcome
     "Scenario 1: Government wins all" : 65
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
     "Scenario 3: Constitutional crisis" : 13</pre>
 <p><em>Probabilities sum to 100%. All scenarios based on parliamentary pattern analysis and motion text; no insider information used. Confidence [C2–D3] reflects the limited predictive base for Swedish coalition dynamics 6+ weeks out.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1115,9 +1115,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators per Scenario<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Triggers</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU committee vote date announced</td><td>Scenario 1 or 2 pathway</td><td>Late April 2026</td></tr><tr><td>C leadership statement on HD024089 outcome</td><td>Scenario 2 possible</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Legal NGO constitutional filing on prop. 2025/26:235</td><td>Scenario 3 activated</td><td>August 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Government press release modifying electricity support</td><td>Scenario 2 outcome</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>SD amendment demand on energy proposition</td><td>New Scenario possible</td><td>April–May 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1197,15 +1197,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>Likelihood (1–5)</th><th>Impact (1–5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Trend</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01</td><td>All opposition motions voted down, zero policy change</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>SD-government bloc solid; structural 2025/26 pattern [B1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-02</td><td>Fuel tax cut passes but electricity support design remains inequitable</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>S motion HD024082 identifies 800k excluded households [B1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-03</td><td>Stricter deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235) creates mass court challenges</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Lagrådet rejection + extensive remiss criticism [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-04</td><td>Opposition fragmentation deepens ahead of 2026 elections</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td><strong>15</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>No joint motions across budget cluster; C partial government support [B1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-05</td><td>Arms export modernisation creates diplomatic risk with EU partners</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>MP HD024096 + remiss citations on third-country diversion [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-06</td><td>Mottagandelag area restrictions ruled unconstitutional</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Uncertain</td><td>C HD024089 raises kommunal självstyre concerns [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-07</td><td>Climate credibility damage from fuel tax cut undermines Swedish COP commitments</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>MP HD024098 + agency consensus [A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-risks-li--10">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--10"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15">R-04 — Opposition Fragmentation [HIGH RISK, L×I = 15]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks-li--10">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15">R-04 — Opposition Fragmentation [HIGH RISK, L×I = 15]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15"></a></h4>
 <p>The most severe risk for democratic accountability: when S, V, and MP cannot agree on a budget alternative, the government faces no unified opposition. Evidence: three separate motions (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) against the same government proposition, each with a different analytical framework and policy demand. This is structurally worse than the 2022–23 budget period when S and V coordinated more frequently.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading chain</strong>: Fragmentation → no alternative budget → government wins FiU vote → fuel tax implemented → climate agencies increase criticism → media shifts to "government vs experts" framing → opposition fails to capture narrative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each">R-02 + R-03 — Social Policy Double Jeopardy [HIGH RISK, L×I = 12 each]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each">R-02 + R-03 — Social Policy Double Jeopardy [HIGH RISK, L×I = 12 each]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each"></a></h4>
 <p>Two simultaneous social policy risks create a compound exposure: (1) electricity support design flaw disproportionately affects cooperative housing (S: HD024082); (2) deportation law challenged as unconstitutional by Lagrådet with likely court litigation (V: HD024090). Either alone is manageable; together they strain public trust in government competence.</p>
 <p><strong>Posterior probability</strong>: Given Lagrådet's explicit rejection and the 2022 reform being less than 4 years old, probability of at least one court challenge to the deportation rules within 12 months of implementation (Sep 2026) is estimated at ~55% [C3 — analyst judgement].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map">Mermaid: Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map">Mermaid: Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Opposition Motions 2026-04-23
@@ -1224,33 +1224,33 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map">Mermaid: Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden=
     R-06 Unconstitutional: [0.42, 0.78]</pre>
 <p><em>Confidence: MEDIUM [B2–C3]. Risk scores based on parliamentary patterns + primary documents.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [B2]<br>
 <strong>Framing</strong>: Strengths/Weaknesses of the <em>opposition bloc's</em> motion strategy; Opportunities/Threats from <em>their</em> political perspective.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expert agency backing for climate framing</strong>: MP's HD024098 cites Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet and Trafikverket as opposing the fuel tax cut — an unusually strong expert consensus. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098] <code>[A2]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet criticism of deportation law</strong>: V's HD024090 highlights that Lagrådet explicitly advised against prop. 2025/26:235, strengthening the human rights argument. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090] <code>[A1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Distributional evidence for V</strong>: V's HD024092 invokes RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158 + dnr 2025:1607) showing the government's reforms disproportionately benefit top-income deciles. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092] <code>[A2]</code></li>
 <li><strong>S credibility on electricity design flaw</strong>: 800,000 households in shared-grid housing cooperatives excluded from S-identified design flaw, giving S a concrete, relatable grievance. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fragmentation undermines narrative unity</strong>: S, V, and MP all oppose the budget supplementary but offer incompatible alternatives (different electricity support models, different rationales). No single motion by multiple parties. [HD024082, HD024092, HD024098 — three separate dok_ids, same proposition, zero joint motion] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>C defection on migration</strong>: C (HD024089, HD024095) broadly accepts both the new Mottagandelag and the deportation framework with modifications, breaking centre-left solidarity. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089, HD024095] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>No budget alternative quantified</strong>: S (HD024082) demands better electricity support design but does not specify a costed alternative in the motion text. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] <code>[B2]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Arms export motion (HD024096) unlikely to pass</strong>: With SD, M, L, KD backing government arms policy, MP's export ban demand is politically isolated. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096] <code>[B2]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Election framing window</strong>: The 2026 election provides a six-month window to build a joint opposition narrative around energy transition + distributional justice — the motion cluster provides raw material. [aggregate assessment, no single dok_id] <code>[C3]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional review potential</strong>: If Mottagandelag area-restrictions violate kommunal självstyre principles, judicial review could embarrass the government. [HD024089 cites constitutional concerns; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089] <code>[C3]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Agency credibility cascade</strong>: If Konjunkturinstitutet issues a formal advisory against the fuel tax (beyond the remiss stage), it upgrades the opposition's credibility posture. [HD024098 — remiss phase already hostile] <code>[B3]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet precedent on deportation</strong>: If courts challenge prop. 2025/26:235 implementation (as Lagrådet suggested they might), V's motion record becomes prescient. [HD024090] <code>[C3]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SD-government bloc solidarity</strong>: SD's reliable coalition support for the government means all three motion clusters will likely be voted down. [structural observation based on riksmöte 2025/26 voting patterns] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Economic relief narrative overrides climate concerns</strong>: Rising energy prices give the government a populist justification; opposition parties risk appearing elitist by opposing fuel price relief. [HD024092, HD024098 acknowledge this framing risk] <code>[B2]</code></li>
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <li><strong>Fast legislative timeline</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:236 fuel tax cut effective 1 May 2026 — if FiU moves quickly, motions may have minimal deliberation time. [HD024092 — motion text references 1 May start date] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1281,10 +1281,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths (Expert consensus, Lagrådet)</th><th>Weaknesses (Fragmentation, no costed alt.)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong> (Election framing, constitutional review)</td><td>SO: Build joint climate narrative using agency consensus as credibility anchor</td><td>WO: Prioritise one common budget alternative and reduce duplication</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong> (SD solidarity, relief narrative)</td><td>ST: Use Lagrådet record to anchor rule-of-law argument in media</td><td>WT: Risk of all motions failing with no political gain; need pre-committee vote coordination</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy">Cross-SWOT: Migration vs Energy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy">Cross-SWOT: Migration vs Energy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy"></a></h3>
 <p>The opposition's tactical problem: energy opponents (V, MP) and migration opponents (all but C) are the same parties, but their framing strategies diverge. MP emphasises expert consensus; V emphasises distributional justice; S emphasises design quality. A unified "alternative governance" framing would require S to explicitly endorse V's distributional frame — currently politically infeasible.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-swot-summary">Mermaid: SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-swot-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-swot-summary">Mermaid: SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-swot-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title SWOT Quadrant — Opposition Motion Strategy
@@ -1304,11 +1304,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-swot-summary">Mermaid: SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="t
     Relief narrative: [0.82, 0.18]</pre>
 <p><em>Admiralty codes assigned per evidence type: government documents [A1], corroborated reports [A2], single-source official [B1], peer-reviewed public [B2], unconfirmed open-source [C3]</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <p>Threats assessed against <strong>democratic accountability norms</strong> and <strong>opposition party viability</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat">T-1: Legislative Steamrolling (Primary Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat">T-1: Legislative Steamrolling (Primary Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Institutional integrity</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Tidewater coalition (M, SD, KD, L) + occasional C</li>
@@ -1317,7 +1317,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat">T-1: Legislative Steamro
 <li><strong>TTP analog</strong>: "Vote dominance" — structural majority used without negotiation</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat">T-2: Distributional Justice Erosion (Social Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat">T-2: Distributional Justice Erosion (Social Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Social cohesion</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Government fiscal policy</li>
@@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat">T-2: Distributional
 <li><strong>Kill chain stage</strong>: Policy formulation → implementation → distributional outcome → public trust erosion</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat">T-3: Constitutional Overreach on Deportation (Rule-of-Law Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat">T-3: Constitutional Overreach on Deportation (Rule-of-Law Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Constitutional order</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Government (prop. 2025/26:235)</li>
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat">T-3:
 <li><strong>TTP</strong>: "Incremental erosion" of judicial review rights</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat">T-4: Climate Policy Regression (Environmental Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat">T-4: Climate Policy Regression (Environmental Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Long-term governance</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Government energy policy</li>
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat">T-4: Climate Poli
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation">Attack Tree: Democratic Accountability Degradation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation">Attack Tree: Democratic Accountability Degradation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     ROOT["⚠️ Degraded democratic accountability"]:::critical
@@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation">Attack Tree: Democ
     classDef threat fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0,stroke:#ff006e
     classDef evidence fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0,stroke:#00d9ff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1423,299 +1423,299 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p><em>Political Threat Actor framework adapted from MITRE ATT&#x26;CK for political intelligence purposes. All threats are of a legislative/policy nature.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024077">HD024077<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024077"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024077-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024077
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024079">HD024079<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024079"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024079
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-1">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-1">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024080">HD024080<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024080"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024080
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-2">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-2">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024082<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Socialdemokraterna (S) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Mikael Damberg<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:236)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed by riksdagen.se document access, primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion opposing prop. 2025/26:236's supplementary budget. Core argument: the electricity support scheme has a design flaw that excludes approximately 800,000 cooperative housing (<em>bostadsrätt</em>) households. S proposes amending the design to include these households, not cancelling the energy support overall.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 8/10. This is the flagship opposition budget motion from the largest opposition party, filed by the former Prime Minister (Damberg). It will attract maximal media attention and define S's pre-election fiscal narrative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-3">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-3">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-3"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>800,000 cooperative housing households are excluded from electricity support by a design flaw.</li>
 <li>The design flaw is amendable — does not require rejecting the entire proposition.</li>
 <li>S positions itself as the "competent alternative" that would fix, not block, energy support.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024092 (V: reject entire fuel tax cut), HD024098 (MP: same rejection) — shows S is the moderate among the three opposition actors.</li>
 <li>Links to <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code> — S's amendment (if adopted by FiU) would require government concession.</li>
 <li>Links to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> IND-01 (FiU vote) and IND-02 (Skatteverket implementation notice).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3"></a></h3>
 <p>The exact number of excluded households (800,000) is S's figure — not independently verified from Skatteverket data. [B2]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024086">HD024086<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024086"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024086
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-4">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-4">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024087">HD024087<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024087"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024087
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-5">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-5">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024089">HD024089<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024089"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024089<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Centerpartiet (C) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Niels Paarup-Petersen<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to new Mottagandelagen)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source; full text fetched</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion on the new reception law (<em>Mottagandelagen</em>). C broadly accepts the framework but opposes specific provisions: area restrictions on asylum seekers and the absence of guaranteed emergency welfare rights for municipalities hosting large reception centres.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. Reveals C's pragmatic liberalism on migration — neither fully supporting the restrictive government framework nor opposing it entirely. This is the key "swing vote" document in the migration cluster.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-6">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-6">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-6"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>C accepts the Mottagandelagen framework broadly — Sweden needs a new reception framework.</li>
 <li>Area restrictions on asylum seekers are disproportionate and should be removed.</li>
 <li>Municipalities must have guaranteed emergency welfare rights when hosting reception centres (financial protection for local authorities).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-1">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-1">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024095 (C: same conditional acceptance pattern on deportation law)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code> §Mottagandelagen vote prediction</li>
 <li>Links to <code>implementation-feasibility.md</code> — C's municipal welfare demand is noted as unlikely to be accepted</li>
 <li>Links to <code>voter-segmentation.md</code> §C section — rural pragmatic liberal base</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Whether C will press its amendments to a committee vote or accept the law without amendment is uncertain. [B3]. The financial scale of C's municipal welfare demand is not costed.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024090">HD024090<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024090"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024090<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Vänsterpartiet (V) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Tony Haddou<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:235)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion demanding rejection of the deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235) on rule-of-law grounds. V cites Lagrådet's explicit rejection of the proposition as evidence of constitutional deficiency.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-7">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-7">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 9/10. Highest-stakes motion in the migration cluster. Lagrådet citation gives it maximum institutional legitimacy for rule-of-law argument.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-7">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-7">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-7"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Lagrådet explicitly rejected prop. 2025/26:235 as "clearly ill-advised."</li>
 <li>The law targets individuals who arrived in Sweden before age 15 — ECHR Art. 8 protection is particularly strong for this group.</li>
 <li>V demands the proposition be withdrawn entirely.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-2">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-2">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024095 (C: conditional acceptance — weaker stance than V's full rejection)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> KJ-2 (expert isolation of government's legislative program)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>historical-parallels.md</code> §Lagrådet Rejections</li>
 <li>Links to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> IND-10 (ECtHR case registration)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Lagrådet opinion text not independently fetched — cited as reported in V's motion. [B2]. "Clearly ill-advised" quote is V's paraphrase, not the verbatim Lagrådet text.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024091">HD024091<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024091"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024091
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-8">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-8">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-8">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-8">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024092">HD024092<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024092"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024092<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Vänsterpartiet (V) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Nooshi Dadgostar<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:236)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion opposing the fuel tax cut element of prop. 2025/26:236. V argues the measure is distributionally regressive, citing RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158) showing that the benefit accrues disproportionately to high-income households (5:1 income-skew ratio).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-9">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-9">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-9"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. Strong analytical foundation via RUT cite. V is positioning itself as the distributional-justice voice in the opposition.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-9">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-9">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-9"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>RUT dnr 2026:158 shows the fuel tax cut benefits high-income households 5x more than low-income households.</li>
 <li>The measure is economically inefficient and regressive.</li>
 <li>V proposes rejecting the fuel tax cut and redirecting funds to targeted household support.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-3">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-3">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024098 (MP agrees on rejection; V and MP aligned on outcome, not on alternative)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>voter-segmentation.md</code> §V section — distributional argument targets different voter segment than S</li>
 <li>Links to <code>devils-advocate.md</code> H2 — electoral vs. economic rationale</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9"></a></h3>
 <p>RUT dnr 2026:158 document not independently fetched — cited as reported in V's motion. [B2]. V's proposed alternative (targeted household support) is not costed in the motion.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024095">HD024095<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024095"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024095<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Centerpartiet (C) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Niels Paarup-Petersen<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:235)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source; full text fetched</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion on the deportation law. Unlike V (HD024090), C does not demand full rejection — instead accepts the framework conditionally, demanding that deportation orders include adequate procedural safeguards and proportionality assessment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-10">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-10">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. C's conditional acceptance is politically consequential — it means C will likely vote for the law despite reservations, giving the government a margin of safety beyond its bare 176 majority.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-10">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-10">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-10"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>The deportation framework has legitimacy — Sweden must be able to deport criminals.</li>
 <li>Individual cases must receive proportionality assessment (balancing Article 8 ECHR rights).</li>
 <li>C does not endorse V/MP's full rejection.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-4">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-4">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024090 (V: full rejection — starkly different from C's position)</li>
 <li>Links to HD024089 (C: parallel conditional-acceptance pattern on Mottagandelag)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code> — C's vote behaviour is the key swing variable</li>
 <li>Links to <code>voter-segmentation.md</code> §C section</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10"></a></h3>
 <p>Whether C's amendment demands will be adopted by SfU committee is uncertain. If adopted (unlikely given government majority), this becomes a signal of coalition complexity. [B3]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024096">HD024096<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024096<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Miljöpartiet (MP) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Jacob Risberg<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion demanding an arms export ban to dictatorships and opposing new secrecy provisions in the arms export control framework. This motion is separate from the budget and migration clusters.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-11">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-11">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-11"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 4/10. Arms export policy is important but less electorally salient than budget and migration in the current cycle.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title">Key Claims (from metadata and title)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title">Key Claims (from metadata and title)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>MP demands a ban on arms exports to authoritarian states.</li>
 <li>MP opposes new secrecy provisions that would reduce parliamentary oversight of arms exports.</li>
 <li>This motion continues MP's longstanding foreign policy profile on arms control.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-5">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-5">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to <code>comparative-international.md</code> — Sweden's arms export policy is under European scrutiny</li>
 <li>Links to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> IND-09 (arms export policy development)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched — analysis based on title and metadata only. [C3]. The specific secrecy provisions being opposed are not detailed in available data. This is a significant evidence gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: This document should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 if full text is fetched.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024097">HD024097<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024097"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024097
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-12">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-12">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-12"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-11">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-11">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-11"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024098">HD024098<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024098"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024098<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Miljöpartiet (MP) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Janine Alm Ericson<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:236)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion opposing the fuel tax cut, citing five expert agencies: Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet, and Trafikverket. MP argues the measure undermines climate targets and contradicts expert advice.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-13">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-13">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-13"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. Five-agency citation gives this motion unusually strong expert legitimacy. MP is positioning as the "expert-aligned" voice.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-12">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-12">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-12"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Five named government agencies opposed the measure in remiss.</li>
 <li>The fuel tax cut contradicts Sweden's climate commitments and 2030 targets.</li>
 <li>MP endorses the V position (reject cut) and adds a climate reinvestment requirement.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-6">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-6">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024092 (V: same rejection; MP endorses V's distributional argument and adds climate dimension)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> — agency documents not independently fetched</li>
 <li>Links to <code>comparative-international.md</code> — Norway and Germany have similar expert-vs-government tensions on energy taxation</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13"></a></h3>
 <p>The five agency remiss documents are not independently fetched — cited as reported in MP's motion. [B2]. MP's threshold risk (currently near 4%) means this motion may be the party's last major pre-election policy statement.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026">Seat-Projection Deltas (as of April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026">Seat-Projection Deltas (as of April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>Based on recent opinion polling patterns (no specific poll cited — structural assessment):</p>
 
 
@@ -1779,13 +1779,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026">Seat-Projection Deltas (as o
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Est. current support</th><th>Trend</th><th>2026 seat projection delta</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>~30%</td><td>Stable</td><td>+0–5</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>~19%</td><td>Stable</td><td>-0–3</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>~18%</td><td>Declining</td><td>-2–5</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>~9%</td><td>Slightly rising</td><td>+0–3</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>~6%</td><td>Stable</td><td>+0–2</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>~5%</td><td>Borderline</td><td>±0 (threshold risk)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>~4%</td><td>At threshold</td><td>±0 (threshold risk)</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>~4%</td><td>Stable</td><td>±0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Assessment confidence: LOW [C3] — no specific poll data. Structural analysis based on motion evidence only.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-2026">Coalition Viability Post-2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic">Current (Tidö) coalition logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-2026">Coalition Viability Post-2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic">Current (Tidö) coalition logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic"></a></h4>
 <p>The motions confirm the current alignment: M + SD + KD + L govern; C is a partial ally. Opposition (S + V + MP) is fragmented. For a 2026 government change:</p>
 <p><strong>Left-bloc requirement</strong>: S + V + MP would need ~175 seats. Current structural position suggests ~165–170 seats probable — requires either MP clearing 4% threshold AND strong S performance.</p>
 <p><strong>Centre-left alternative</strong>: S + C — possible only if C abandons current alliance. C's partial government support on migration (HD024089, HD024095) suggests C is not ready for this move.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning">This Week's Motion Impact on 2026 Electoral Positioning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning">This Week's Motion Impact on 2026 Electoral Positioning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning">This Week's M
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Motion impact on 2026 positioning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>HD024082 reinforces fiscal competence narrative — good for centrist swing voters</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>HD024092's distributional framing is strong for V base but doesn't expand their electorate</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>HD024098's agency-citation approach shores up green credentials but party at threshold risk</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>HD024089's moderate positioning is electorally rational — keeps both coalition options open</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>No motions; expected to support government — reinforces stable coalition partner image</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot">Mermaid: Coalition Mathematics Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot">Mermaid: Coalition Mathematics Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 pie title Current Parliament Approximate Seat Distribution
     "S (103)" : 103
@@ -1830,9 +1830,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot">Mermaid: Coalition Mathematic
     "KD (19)" : 19</pre>
 <p><em>Seat counts based on 2022 election results — 349 total seats. Government coalition (M+SD+KD+L) = 176; Opposition (S+V+MP) = 145; C = 24 pivotal. Sources: riksdagen.se official data [A1]</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense">2022 Election Seat Allocation (official, riksdagen.se)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense">2022 Election Seat Allocation (official, riksdagen.se)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense">2022 Election Sea
 <strong>Pivotal C</strong>: 24 seats</p>
 <p><em>Source: riksdagen.se official election results [A1]</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes">This Week's Motions: Predicted Vote Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes">This Week's Motions: Predicted Vote Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes">This Week's Motions: Pred
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Proposition</th><th>Ja (expect)</th><th>Nej (expect)</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)</td><td>M+SD+KD+L = 176</td><td>S+V+MP = 149</td><td>C ~0–24</td><td>PASSES (government majority)</td></tr><tr><td>prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td><td>M+SD+KD+L = 176</td><td>V+MP = 42</td><td>S+C = 131</td><td>PASSES (government majority)</td></tr><tr><td>prop. 2025/26:Mottagandelag</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+C = 200</td><td>V+MP = 42</td><td>S = 107</td><td>PASSES strongly</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096 arms export ban</td><td>V+MP+S = 149 (partial)</td><td>M+SD = 141</td><td>KD+L+C</td><td>FAILS</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Assessment: All government propositions pass with current coalition. Opposition motions all fail. C's partial abstention on migration does not change outcomes.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis">Governing Majority Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis">Governing Majority Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1977,33 +1977,33 @@ <h2 id="rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis">Governing Majority Sensitivi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Government seats</th><th>Margin</th><th>Stable?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Current (all four parties full support)</td><td>176</td><td>+3</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>L drops out or abstains</td><td>160</td><td>-13</td><td>Minority, needs C</td></tr><tr><td>SD rebels on one vote</td><td>103</td><td>-70</td><td>Needs full C+L</td></tr><tr><td>Full Tidö coalition + C</td><td>200</td><td>+51</td><td>Highly stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Threshold</strong>: 175 seats needed for absolute majority. With 176, the government has a margin of 1. A single resignation or long-term illness in M/SD/KD/L bloc can produce a 174-175 tie requiring Speaker casting vote.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236">Mermaid: Vote Prediction for prop. 2025/26:236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236">Mermaid: Vote Prediction for prop. 2025/26:236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "pie1": "#00d9ff", "pie2": "#ff006e", "pie3": "#ffbe0b"}}}%%
 pie title Predicted Vote: prop 2025/26:236 (Fuel Tax)
     "Ja — Government coalition (176)" : 176
     "Nej — S+V+MP (149)" : 149
     "Abstain/Absent (~24)" : 24</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions">Target Voter Segments by Party (this week's motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082">S — Socialdemokraterna (HD024082)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions">Target Voter Segments by Party (this week's motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082">S — Socialdemokraterna (HD024082)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Cooperative housing residents (<em>bostadsrättsinnehavare</em>) — approximately 800,000 households who were excluded from the electricity support scheme by a design flaw in prop. 2025/26:236. These are primarily urban and suburban middle-income households, core S electoral territory that drifted toward M/SD in 2022.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: The 800,000 cooperative households overlap with voters who might support the fuel tax cut for other reasons. S must offer a compelling alternative that fixes the design flaw without appearing to oppose energy relief broadly.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092">V — Vänsterpartiet (HD024092)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092">V — Vänsterpartiet (HD024092)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Low-income workers and renters in car-dependent areas who spend a disproportionate share of income on fuel. V's motion cites RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158) showing that the fuel tax cut skews 5:1 toward higher-income households — the inverse of V's target segment.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: V's base is partly urban non-car-dependent (where the fuel cut is less salient) and partly peripheral workers (where any energy relief is welcome regardless of distributional analysis). The RUT argument plays well in V's intellectual base but may not resonate with peripheral V voters.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098">MP — Miljöpartiet (HD024098)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098">MP — Miljöpartiet (HD024098)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Climate-concerned voters, primarily urban, highly educated, who frame energy pricing as a climate tool. MP's motion's five-agency citation strategy appeals to voters who trust scientific and bureaucratic expertise.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: MP is at the 4% threshold. The party needs to maximize turnout among its core voters rather than expand. The agency-citation approach is credible with the base but does not add new segments.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095">C — Centerpartiet (HD024089, HD024095)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095">C — Centerpartiet (HD024089, HD024095)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Rural and small-town voters with pragmatic liberal instincts. C's moderate positioning on migration (accepting the framework, opposing extreme elements) and absence of opposition on energy reflect a rural electorate that is culturally conservative but economically pragmatic.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: C must distinguish itself from both M and S. The current motion pattern shows C differentiating on rule-of-law grounds (opposing deportation without procedural safeguards) while accepting the economic framework. This is a coherent "liberal conservative" position.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-map">Segment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-map">Segment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Voter Segment: Economic Concern vs. Cultural Conservatism
@@ -2021,16 +2021,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-map">Segment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     M target: [0.35, 0.75]</pre>
 <p><em>Assessment confidence: MEDIUM [C3]. Quadrant placement is structural inference from motion content, not polling data.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: Norway (Nordic welfare state comparator), Germany (EU arms export + energy policy)</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary</strong>: Denmark (migration/reception policy), Netherlands (deportation reform)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy">Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy">Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy">Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (2026)</th><th>Norway</th><th>Germany</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax policy</td><td>Temporary reduction to EU minimum (prop. 2025/26:236)</td><td>No fuel tax cut; used petroleum fund for household support</td><td>Extended carbon pricing; rebates targeted to low-income</td><td>Sweden outlier in using fuel tax as relief mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Climate instrument</td><td>Carbon tax at risk of dilution</td><td>Carbon pricing maintained</td><td>Emissions trading as primary lever</td><td>Sweden historically strong carbon price — this cut signals policy drift</td></tr><tr><td>Distributional approach</td><td>Electricity support (3.4bn SEK); but cooperative housing excluded</td><td>Targeted household transfers</td><td>Low-income specific rebates</td><td>Norwegian and German models more targeted</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden's approach is anomalous among Nordic states. Norway maintained its carbon price framework during the energy crisis 2022–23 and used general fiscal transfers instead of sectoral tax cuts. Germany's 2022 "Tankrabatt" (fuel tax reduction) was widely criticised as poorly targeted — and is now cited in Swedish debates by opposition parties. The government's choice to replicate the German Tankrabatt model, despite its documented failure, is strategically vulnerable to exactly the critique MP (HD024098) and V (HD024092) are mounting.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals">Issue 2: Deportation of Foreign Nationals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals">Issue 2: Deportation of Foreign Nationals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals">Issue 2: Deportation of For
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (prop. 2025/26:235)</th><th>Denmark</th><th>Netherlands</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Threshold</td><td>Lowered to any sentence stricter than a fine</td><td>Lower threshold already in place; regular reviews</td><td>Tightened in 2023; Lagrådet equivalent raised concerns</td></tr><tr><td>Childhood arrival protection</td><td>Removed for under-15 arrivals</td><td>Never had strong equivalent protection</td><td>Retained with ECHR constraints</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet/constitutional review</td><td>Explicit rejection [A1]</td><td>No equivalent body</td><td>Constitutional court review ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR compliance</td><td>Contested</td><td>Challenged in ECtHR cases</td><td>Several adverse ECtHR judgements on expulsion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In</strong>: Denmark's more aggressive deportation regime has faced multiple ECtHR rulings. The Netherlands' 2023 tightening was struck down in part by constitutional courts. Sweden, by removing childhood-arrival protections, risks ECHR Art. 8 (family life) claims — a risk explicitly noted by V in HD024090. The comparator experience suggests Scenario 3 (constitutional challenge) is underpriced at 13%.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation">Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation">Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation">Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation<a cla
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: [Norway — arms export], [Germany — arms export], [Netherlands — arms export]</p>
 <p><strong>Outside-In</strong>: MP's (HD024096) demand that third-country diversion risk always be considered at the licensing stage aligns with German practice. The Netherlands requires parliamentary notification for major sales. Sweden's proposed framework is less stringent on both counts. From an international norm perspective, MP's position is closer to EU partner practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison">Mermaid: Policy Position Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison">Mermaid: Policy Position Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Policy Restrictiveness vs International Norm (Higher = More Restrictive)"
@@ -2150,25 +2150,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison">Mermaid: Policy Position Comparis
 <p><em>Sweden government position scored against Nordic/EU comparators. Score 1 = least restrictive, 5 = most restrictive.</em><br>
 <em>Sources: riksdagen.se (primary documents) + ECHR case law (general knowledge baseline). Admiralty [B2].</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics">Parallel 1: 2002–2006 — Opposition Fragmentation Before Bloc Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics">Parallel 1: 2002–2006 — Opposition Fragmentation Before Bloc Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Before the "Alliansen" coalition was formalized in 2004–2006, the centre-right parties (M, C, L, KD) often filed competing motions on the same government propositions, offering incompatible alternatives. This fragmentation allowed the Social Democratic government to portray the opposition as ungovernable.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity to 2026</strong>: S, V, and MP are replicating this pattern — all opposing the same proposition (2025/26:236) but with incompatible alternatives. The government can credibly ask: "What would the opposition actually do?"</p>
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: Alliansen required a dominant party (M under Reinfeldt) to discipline the others around a common platform. No equivalent disciplinarian exists in the current S-led opposition. S leads but cannot compel V and MP to align.</p>
 <p><strong>Outcome probability</strong>: Based on this parallel, the government's electoral position is likely to benefit from opposition fragmentation unless a formal pre-election coordination agreement is signed before summer 2026. [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority">Parallel 2: 2014 "Decemberöverenskommelsen" — Managing a Thin Majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority">Parallel 2: 2014 "Decemberöverenskommelsen" — Managing a Thin Majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: In December 2014, after the 2014 election produced no clear majority, the Decemberöverenskommelse (the "December agreement") between the red-green government and the Alliance created a norm that a minority government should be allowed to govern via its own budget.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity</strong>: The current Tidö coalition's 176-seat majority (margin: 1) is structurally similar to the weak governments of 2010–2018. A single defection, illness, or MP threshold breach could recreate a hung-parliament dynamic.</p>
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: The Tidö coalition has an explicit four-party agreement, unlike the minority governments of 2014–2018. This makes it more resilient but also means SD has greater policy leverage than in a confidence-and-supply arrangement.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern">Parallel 3: Lagrådet Rejections — Historical Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern">Parallel 3: Lagrådet Rejections — Historical Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Lagrådet's rejection of prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law) continues a pattern of Lagrådet expressing serious concern about migration-related legislation. Similar concerns were raised about prop. 2021/22:131 (on residence permits) and prop. 2015/16:174 (temporary asylum restrictions).</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: In all three prior cases, the Riksdag passed the legislation despite Lagrådet concerns. In two cases (2015 and 2021), subsequent ECHR or Swedish court rulings required legislative amendments within 3–7 years.</p>
 <p><strong>Implication for 2026</strong>: The deportation law is likely to pass but faces elevated legal risk. The 3–7 year reform cycle means the political consequences will fall on whatever government is in power in 2028–2031.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-historical-timeline">Mermaid: Historical Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-historical-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-historical-timeline">Mermaid: Historical Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-historical-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark"}}%%
 timeline
     title Swedish Legislative-Judicial Cycle on Migration
@@ -2179,9 +2179,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-historical-timeline">Mermaid: Historical Timeline<a class=""
     2026 : Prop 2025/26:235 (New deportation law) — Lagrådet explicitly rejects
     2030 : Projected: ECtHR ruling or Swedish Supreme Administrative Court review</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:236 (Supplementary Budget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:236 (Supplementary Budget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget">Feasibili
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative passage</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Government has 176-seat majority; S/V/MP amendments will fail</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative implementation</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Tax Agency (<em>Skatteverket</em>) has standard fuel tax adjustment mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Cooperative housing exclusion fix</td><td>LOW — short term</td><td>S's HD024082 would require a separate fast-track proposition; FiU would need to schedule before May 1 implementation date</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR compatibility</td><td>HIGH</td><td>No fundamental rights concerns with energy tax cuts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key implementation risk</strong>: The 800,000 cooperative housing household exclusion (HD024082) is a genuine technical problem. If Skatteverket confirms the exclusion at implementation, it becomes a politically embarrassing live issue during the pre-election summer.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:235 (Deportation Law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:235 (Deportation Law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law">Feasibility As
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative passage</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Government majority; Lagrådet rejection is advisory only</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative implementation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Migrationsverket will need new procedures and expanded capacity</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenge</td><td>HIGH probability of ECHR challenge</td><td>HD024090 cites Lagrådet; historical pattern shows ~3–7 year legal trajectory</td></tr><tr><td>Deterrence effect</td><td>LOW confidence</td><td>Limited empirical evidence that deportation threat reduces irregular arrivals [C3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law">Feasibility Assessment: Mottagandelagen (new reception law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law">Feasibility Assessment: Mottagandelagen (new reception law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2276,7 +2276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law">Feasibility
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative passage</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>C broadly accepts; HD024089 shows C's amendments are limited</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal implementation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Area restriction provisions (opposed by C in HD024089) will create friction with municipalities</td></tr><tr><td>Emergency welfare rights</td><td>LOW priority for government</td><td>C's demand for municipal emergency welfare rights (HD024089) is unlikely to be accepted; C has shown it will vote for the law regardless</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility">Opposition's Counterfactual Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility">Opposition's Counterfactual Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility"></a></h3>
 <p>If the opposition's alternative budget were implemented:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S's design fix (HD024082)</strong>: Technically straightforward — would require extending support mechanism to cooperative housing associations. Net cost: estimated 500 MSEK–1.5 GSEK (not costed in motion — gap noted [C3]).</li>
@@ -2285,10 +2285,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility">Opposition's Counterfactual F
 </ul>
 <p><em>Cost assessment confidence: LOW [C3] — no official costing document available for opposition alternatives.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental">Hypothesis H1: Opposition Fragmentation is Strategic, Not Accidental<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental">Hypothesis H1: Opposition Fragmentation is Strategic, Not Accidental<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: S, V, and MP filed separate budget motions (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) deliberately to address different voter segments — S targets cooperative housing residents, V targets low-income workers, MP targets climate voters. This is coordinated differentiation, not genuine disagreement.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence For</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental">H
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH verdict</strong>: H1 partially confirmed. There is likely some tactical coordination at the level of "don't overlap," but the substantive disagreement on the fuel tax cut is genuine. The fragmentation is real and strategically harmful. [C2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic">Hypothesis H2: Government's Fuel Tax Cut is Primarily Electoral, Not Economic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic">Hypothesis H2: Government's Fuel Tax Cut is Primarily Electoral, Not Economic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The fuel tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) has no credible economic rationale (Konjunkturinstitutet says it won't solve household budget pressure effectively) and is primarily designed to generate a pre-election "relief" narrative, with SD and suburban car-dependent voters as the target.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence For</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-eco
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH verdict</strong>: H2 partially confirmed. The measure likely has both genuine relief intent AND electoral timing. The opposition's framing challenge is that they cannot convincingly deny the relief rationale without appearing to oppose household cost relief. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect">Hypothesis H3: Lagrådet Rejection of Deportation Law Will Have No Lasting Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect">Hypothesis H3: Lagrådet Rejection of Deportation Law Will Have No Lasting Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: Despite Lagrådet's explicit rejection of prop. 2025/26:235, the law will pass, be implemented, and face no successful constitutional challenge — Lagrådet opinions are advisory, not binding, and courts rarely strike down parliamentary legislation.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence For</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2337,18 +2337,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-las
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH verdict</strong>: H3 partially confirmed for short-term (2026–27). However, the ECHR dimension means a 5–7 year legal trajectory is possible that could ultimately embarrass the government. The medium-term political risk is underestimated. [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Weakest point in the opposition's overall strategy</strong>: The opposition's biggest vulnerability is that the government can credibly claim to be "doing something" about energy prices and migration — two of the top 2–3 voter concerns. The opposition offers better design and rule-of-law arguments, but these are process arguments, not outcome arguments. Voters who pay high energy bills do not primarily care about distributional efficiency — they care about relief. The opposition is winning the technocratic argument while losing the emotional one.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Hypothesis R1: SD will vote against the fuel tax cut</strong> — Rejected. SD's electoral base in car-dependent peripheral Sweden makes opposing a fuel tax cut politically impossible. [B1]</li>
 <li><strong>Hypothesis R2: S and V will file a joint motion</strong> — Rejected. The documentary record shows three separate motions with no joint sponsor. The distributional framing (V's RUT citation) and design-quality framing (S) are politically incompatible. [B1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2420,17 +2420,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD024082 (S)</th><th>HD024092 (V)</th><th>HD024090 (V)</th><th>HD024096 (MP)</th><th>HD024089 (C)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy domain</strong></td><td>Fiscal/Energy</td><td>Fiscal/Energy/Climate</td><td>Criminal justice/Migration</td><td>Foreign policy/Security</td><td>Migration/Social</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Legislative stage</strong></td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>Committee (SfU)</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>Committee (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ideological axis</strong></td><td>Centre-left</td><td>Left</td><td>Left</td><td>Green-left</td><td>Centre</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU/International dimension</strong></td><td>Moderate (energy directive)</td><td>Moderate (climate treaty)</td><td>High (ECHR, deportation)</td><td>High (EU arms export regime)</td><td>Moderate (EU reception directives)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral salience</strong></td><td>High (household energy)</td><td>Medium-high (redistribution)</td><td>Medium (rule of law)</td><td>Medium-low (niche)</td><td>Medium (municipal autonomy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data sensitivity</strong></td><td>Low (public budget data)</td><td>Low (RUT public analysis)</td><td>Low (public legal opinion)</td><td>Low-medium (export controls)</td><td>Low (public legislation)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority tier</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td><td>P1 — Critical</td><td>P1 — Critical</td><td>P2 — High</td><td>P2 — High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-access-classification">Document Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-access-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-access-classification">Document Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-access-classification"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents are publicly available under Offentlighetsprincipen (Swedish freedom of information law). No special handling required. GDPR Art. 9 special categories (political opinion) apply but are publicly made per Art. 9(2)(e).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-retention-guidelines">Retention Guidelines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-guidelines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention-guidelines">Retention Guidelines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-guidelines"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Analysis files: Retain for 24 months (electoral cycle documentation)</li>
 <li>Raw MCP data: 12 months</li>
 <li>Per-document analyses: Permanent public record</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution">Mermaid: Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution">Mermaid: Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 pie title Policy Domain Distribution — 2026-04-23 Motions
     "Fiscal/Energy" : 3
@@ -2440,10 +2440,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution">Mermaid: Policy Domain Distributi
     "Other" : 1</pre>
 <p><em>Based on 14 analysed motions. Sources: riksdagen.se official document metadata [A1]</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu">Cluster 1: Extra Ändringsbudget för 2026 (FiU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu">Cluster 1: Extra Ändringsbudget för 2026 (FiU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary proposition</strong>: prop. 2025/26:236</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024082 (S), HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP)</li>
@@ -2451,7 +2451,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu">Cluster 1: Extra Ändr
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: risk-assessment.md §R-02, swot-analysis.md §Strengths, election-2026-analysis.md §Budget dimension</li>
 <li><strong>External cross-references</strong>: RUT analysis dnr 2026:158 (cited in HD024092); 5 agency remiss responses (cited in HD024098)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu">Cluster 2: Utvisning på grund av brott (SfU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu">Cluster 2: Utvisning på grund av brott (SfU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary proposition</strong>: prop. 2025/26:235 / SOU 2025:54</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</li>
@@ -2459,7 +2459,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu">Cluster 2: Utvisning på
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: threat-analysis.md §T-3, stakeholder-perspectives.md §Civil Society, historical-parallels.md</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference</strong>: HD024090 cites prop. 2021/22:224 (2022 reform) as context for why another reform is premature</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu">Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu">Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary proposition</strong>: prop. 2025/26:228</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024096 (MP), HD024091 (V)</li>
@@ -2467,7 +2467,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu">Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)<a class=""
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: comparative-international.md (EU arms export regime comparison), threat-analysis.md §T-3</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference</strong>: HD024096 cites Lagrådet criticism of secrecy provisions</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au">Cluster 4: Mottagandelag + Bosättning (SfU / AU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au">Cluster 4: Mottagandelag + Bosättning (SfU / AU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary propositions</strong>: prop. 2025/26:229 (Mottagandelag), prop. 2025/26:215 (Bosättning)</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024089, HD024087, HD024080 (Mottagandelag); HD024079, HD024077, HD024086 (Bosättning)</li>
@@ -2475,14 +2475,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au">Cluster 4: Mottagandela
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: voter-segmentation.md, coalition-mathematics.md §C-swing</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>No joint motions</strong>: Despite opposing the same propositions, S/V/MP filed separate motions against prop. 2025/26:236 — a coordination failure.</li>
 <li><strong>C as partial government ally</strong>: C supported the migration reform framework (HD024089) while opposing specific provisions — diverges from typical opposition coalition.</li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet as opposition amplifier</strong>: Both V (HD024090) and MP (HD024096) explicitly cite Lagrådet rejections, suggesting a deliberate strategy of delegitimising government proposals through constitutional bodies.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network">Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network">Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 graph LR
     P236["Prop 2025/26:236\nBudget supplementary"]:::prop --> M82["HD024082 S"]:::party_s
@@ -2506,51 +2506,51 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network">Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network<a c
     classDef party_c fill:#457b9d,color:#fff
     classDef authority fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--icd-203-audit">§ ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-1-objectivity">Standard 1: Objectivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1-objectivity"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-1-objectivity">Standard 1: Objectivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1-objectivity"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Analysis covers S, V, MP, C motions with equal depth. No party's arguments are dismissed without evidence.</li>
 <li>Limitation: Government's counter-arguments are inferred from proposition text, not from direct government motion analysis. This is a structural limitation of the opposition-motions workflow.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-2-independence">Standard 2: Independence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2-independence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-2-independence">Standard 2: Independence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2-independence"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: No partisan communication influenced the analysis. Sources are all publicly available via riksdagen.se.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-3-timeliness">Standard 3: Timeliness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3-timeliness"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-3-timeliness">Standard 3: Timeliness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3-timeliness"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Motions dated 2026-04-13–17; analysis produced 2026-04-23. Lag: 6–10 days. Acceptable for strategic analysis; not suitable for breaking news.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance">Standard 4: Sourcing and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance">Standard 4: Sourcing and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Strength</strong>: Core claims all cite dok_ids (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024095, HD024096, HD024098, HD024089). External sources (RUT dnr 2026:158, five agencies) are cited as reported in the motions rather than independently verified.</li>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: RUT dnr 2026:158 and specific agency remiss documents were not independently fetched. Confidence in those specific figures is therefore [B2] rather than [A1].</li>
 <li><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: If agency remiss documents are fetched directly, confidence in distributional claims could be upgraded to [A1–A2].</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-5-uncertainty">Standard 5: Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5-uncertainty"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-5-uncertainty">Standard 5: Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5-uncertainty"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Confidence levels applied throughout. WEP language (Likely, Very likely, etc.) used consistently. Coalition scenarios assigned probability bands.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-6-consistency">Standard 6: Consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6-consistency"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-6-consistency">Standard 6: Consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6-consistency"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: The lead narrative (opposition fragmentation as key story) is consistent across executive-brief, synthesis-summary, intelligence-assessment, and scenario-analysis.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-7-completeness">Standard 7: Completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7-completeness"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-7-completeness">Standard 7: Completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7-completeness"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: Arms export motion (HD024096) received less analytical depth than budget and migration motions. Jacob Risberg's full text was not fetched. The secrecy provisions element is underanalysed.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Arms export was identified as significance rank 4 of 4 clusters — lower priority is analytically justified.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-8-accuracy">Standard 8: Accuracy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8-accuracy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-8-accuracy">Standard 8: Accuracy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8-accuracy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Seat counts (349 total, exact per-party figures) sourced from official riksdagen.se election data [A1]. All dok_ids verified against manifest.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies">Standard 9: Appropriate Use of Analogies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies">Standard 9: Appropriate Use of Analogies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Historical parallels (2002–2006 opposition fragmentation, Decemberöverenskommelsen, Lagrådet rejection pattern) are structural analogies, not direct precedent. Limitations noted in <code>historical-parallels.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used">SAT Catalog — Structured Analytic Techniques Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used">SAT Catalog — Structured Analytic Techniques Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2615,8 +2615,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used">SAT Catalog — Str
 <p><strong>Total SAT techniques deployed</strong>: 10 ≥ required minimum of 10. ✅</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-motions</li>
 <li><strong>Run date</strong>: 2026-04-23T07:16:27Z</li>
@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>MCP status</strong>: riksdag-regering LIVE (generated_at: 2026-04-23T07:16:36Z)</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis subfolder</strong>: analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-downloaded-documents">Downloaded Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-downloaded-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-downloaded-documents">Downloaded Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-downloaded-documents"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2783,18 +2783,58 @@ <h2 id="rm-downloaded-documents">Downloaded Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Date</th><th>Committee</th><th>Submitter</th><th>Full-text</th><th>DIW tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>FiU</td><td>Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>FiU</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>FiU</td><td>Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024089</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024087</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024080</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024079</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr><tr><td>HD024077</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>AU</td><td>Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr><tr><td>HD024086</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters-identified">Policy Clusters Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters-identified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters-identified">Policy Clusters Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters-identified"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fiscal / Energy cluster</strong>: HD024082, HD024092, HD024098 — Extra ändringsbudget, bränslesskatt, elstöd</li>
 <li><strong>Migration / Crime nexus cluster</strong>: HD024090, HD024095, HD024097 — Utvisning på grund av brott</li>
 <li><strong>Arms exports cluster</strong>: HD024096, HD024091 — Krigsmateriel regulation</li>
 <li><strong>Asylum reception cluster</strong>: HD024089, HD024087, HD024080, HD024079, HD024077, HD024086 — Mottagandelag, bosättning</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering: All requests successful, no retries required</li>
 <li>Total motions in 2025/26 riksmöte: 4,098 (as of 2026-04-23)</li>
 <li>Retrieval timestamp: 2026-04-23T07:18:00Z</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024077-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -2854,7 +2894,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:10.753Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:32.227Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html b/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html
index 277c111f7c..663cda43dc 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.903Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.380Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:10.903Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.380Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-23T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of","description":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 April 2026 challenging the government's extra supplementary budget (prop. 2025/26:236), deportation law reform (prop.","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:10.903Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024077-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of","description":"Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 April 2026 challenging the government's extra supplementary budget (prop. 2025/26:236), deportation law reform (prop.","datePublished":"2026-04-23T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:32.380Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-23-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024077-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,19 +216,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's parliamentary opposition has filed 14 motions in the week of 13–17 April 2026 challenging the government's extra supplementary budget (prop. 2025/26:236), deportation law reform (prop. 2025/26:235), new arms export framework (prop. 2025/26:228), and new asylum reception law (prop. 2025/26:229). The sharpest cleavage is over the government's temporary fuel tax cut to EU minimum levels: S, V, and MP all oppose it but for divergent reasons, signalling that the centre-left opposition cannot coalesce behind a single counter-proposal ahead of the autumn 2026 election.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Media &#x26; editorial framing</strong>: Determine whether the energy/budget dispute should lead as a "fiscal credibility" or "climate policy" story — evidence below supports both framings simultaneously.</li>
 <li><strong>Election intelligence</strong>: Assess whether opposition fragmentation on fiscal and migration issues reduces the probability of a left-of-centre government change in autumn 2026.</li>
 <li><strong>Policy monitoring</strong>: Track which committee (FiU for budget, SfU for migration) will process motions first and when votes are scheduled.</li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Budget clash</strong>: S wants better-targeted electricity support and flexible use of grid-congestion revenues (HD024082 by Mikael Damberg). V demands the entire fuel tax cut be rejected — cites RUT analysis showing government reforms benefiting top half of income distribution 5× more than the bottom half (HD024092, Nooshi Dadgostar). MP likewise opposes fuel cut; cites Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, and Trafikverket as opposing the proposal (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson).</li>
 <li><strong>Deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235)</strong>: V demands full rejection of stricter deportation rules (HD024090, Tony Haddou); C accepts with conditions requiring systematic repeat offences (HD024095, Niels Paarup-Petersen); MP partial rejection (HD024097, Annika Hirvonen).</li>
@@ -237,10 +237,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⚡ 60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Opposition fragmentation</strong>: S, V, and MP oppose the budget supplementary but cannot unite on a common alternative. On migration, the centre-left bloc is even more fractured, with C partly supporting the government.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔭 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔭 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>FiU committee vote on Extra ändringsbudget (prop. 2025/26:236)</strong> — expected within 3–4 weeks. If SD votes with the government as expected, the fuel tax cut will pass. Watch for any SD amendment demands as a pivotal indicator of coalition stability.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--significance-ranking-diw-weighted">📊 Significance Ranking (DIW weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--significance-ranking-diw-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-ranking-diw-weighted">📊 Significance Ranking (DIW weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-ranking-diw-weighted"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Opposition Motion Significance vs Electoral Impact
@@ -258,12 +258,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--significance-ranking-diw-weighted">📊 Significance Ranking (DIW we
     HD024098 MP-Budget: [0.70, 0.78]</pre>
 <p><em>Confidence: HIGH overall [B2]; individual document scores reflect manifest data + full text where available.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc">Lead Story: Energy-Climate Fault Line Fractures Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc">Lead Story: Energy-Climate Fault Line Fractures Opposition Bloc<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-energy-climate-fault-line-fractures-opposition-bloc"></a></h3>
 <p>The week of 13–17 April 2026 produced the spring session's most revealing clash of opposition values: three parties — Socialdemokraterna (S), Vänsterpartiet (V), and Miljöpartiet (MP) — all oppose the government's extra supplementary budget for 2026 (prop. 2025/26:236) but cannot agree on a common alternative. S demands better-designed electricity support and more flexible use of grid-congestion (flaskhals) revenues (dok_id: HD024082, Mikael Damberg m.fl.). V invokes a RUT distributional analysis showing the government's mandate-period reforms have benefited the top income half 5× more than the bottom half, and demands the fuel tax cut be rejected outright (HD024092, Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl.). MP cites a coalition of expert agencies — Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Trafikverket — as opposing the fuel tax reduction on climate and investment-certainty grounds (HD024098, Janine Alm Ericson m.fl.).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking">DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking">DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -367,25 +367,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-priority-ranking">DIW-Weighted Priority Ranking<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (abbreviated)</th><th>Submitter</th><th>DIW</th><th>Significance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — elstöd</td><td>Damberg (S)</td><td>0.89</td><td>P1 — Lead story</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — avslå bränsle</td><td>Dadgostar (V)</td><td>0.83</td><td>P1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024090</td><td>Utvisning — avslå proposition</td><td>Haddou (V)</td><td>0.80</td><td>P1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget — fel väg</td><td>Alm Ericson (MP)</td><td>0.78</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024096</td><td>Krigsmateriel — exportförbud</td><td>Risberg (MP)</td><td>0.75</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024089</td><td>Mottagandelag — kommuners rätt</td><td>Paarup-Petersen (C)</td><td>0.70</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>Utvisning — systematiska brott</td><td>Paarup-Petersen (C)</td><td>0.65</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024097</td><td>Utvisning — partiellt avslag</td><td>Hirvonen (MP)</td><td>0.62</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024087</td><td>Mottagandelag — avslå</td><td>Hirvonen (MP)</td><td>0.58</td><td>P3</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD024080</td><td>Mottagandelag — privatisering</td><td>Karkiainen (S)</td><td>0.55</td><td>P3</td></tr><tr><td>11–14</td><td>HD024079/077/086/091</td><td>Bosättning/Mottagande/Krigsmateriel</td><td>S/V/MP</td><td>0.40–0.50</td><td>P3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>Three interlocking policy battles define this week's opposition motions:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction">1. Fiscal-Energy Battle (FiU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction">1. Fiscal-Energy Battle (FiU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-fiscal-energy-battle-fiu-jurisdiction"></a></h4>
 <p>The government's Extra ändringsbudget (prop. 2025/26:236) proposes: (a) temporary fuel tax reduction to EU energy directive minimum 1 May–30 Sep 2026 and (b) 3.4 billion SEK in electricity support (1 bn previously allocated + 2.4 bn new). <strong>S</strong> (HD024082) does not oppose the electricity support amount but criticises its design — approximately 800,000 households in housing cooperatives with shared electricity contracts will not qualify. S demands the government return with proposals for targeted, equitable electricity support and for more flexible use of grid-congestion revenues. <strong>V</strong> (HD024092) goes further: rejects the fuel tax cut entirely, cites RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158 and 2025:1607) showing regressive distributional effects, and argues climate transition requirements override short-term relief. <strong>MP</strong> (HD024098) aligns with V on the fuel tax but grounds the argument in expert agency consensus — the proposal "risks deepening Sweden's fossil fuel dependency."</p>
 <p>Intelligence assessment: The fuel tax cut is likely to pass (SD will vote with government), but the opposition's fragmented response reflects a deeper strategic disagreement about whether to fight the government on fiscal credibility (S's approach), distributional justice (V), or climate integrity (MP). This fragmentation is a structural vulnerability ahead of 2026 elections.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction">2. Migration/Crime Nexus (SfU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction">2. Migration/Crime Nexus (SfU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-migrationcrime-nexus-sfu-jurisdiction"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Prop. 2025/26:235</strong> (stricter deportation): Would lower threshold so any sentence stricter than a fine is deportation-eligible; remove protection for those who arrived before age 15; require prosecutors to seek deportation in all eligible cases; and ignore enforcement barriers at the general courts stage. Both <strong>Lagrådet</strong> (the Council on Legislation) and numerous remiss bodies opposed the reforms. V (HD024090) demands full rejection. C (HD024095) accepts deportation in principle but wants systematic repeated offences to be required, not single incidents. MP (HD024097) partly rejects — supports some changes (aggravated assault provisions, 8 kap. 1 §) but not the broad lowering of the threshold.</p>
 <p><strong>Prop. 2025/26:229</strong> (new reception law/Mottagandelag): Would centralise asylum housing; the government takes over full responsibility from municipalities. C (HD024089) broadly supports the framework but opposes: (a) removing municipalities' right to give emergency welfare assistance and (b) "areas restrictions" (områdespolicies). S (HD024080) opposes privatisation of asylum housing. MP (HD024087) rejects the entire proposition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction">3. Arms Export Regulation (UU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction">3. Arms Export Regulation (UU jurisdiction)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-arms-export-regulation-uu-jurisdiction"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Prop. 2025/26:228</strong> (new krigsmateriel framework): MP (HD024096) demands: (1) a complete ban on arms exports to dictatorships, warring nations, and major human rights violators; (2) mandatory consideration of third-country diversion risk; (3) rejection of the new secrecy provisions on software/technology (citing Lagrådet criticism). V (HD024091) opposes the entire proposition.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Title</strong>: "Split Opposition Challenges Sweden's Fuel-Tax Budget and Deportation Laws"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description</strong>: "Sweden's Social Democrats, Left Party and Greens all oppose the government's fuel tax cut — but offer incompatible alternatives, revealing a fractured opposition ahead of autumn 2026 elections."</li>
 <li><strong>Keywords</strong>: Swedish parliament, Riksdag motions, fuel tax, deportation law, arms exports, 2026 election</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map">Mermaid: Policy Battle Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map">Mermaid: Policy Battle Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
     subgraph Budget["💰 Extra Ändringsbudget (FiU)"]
         B1["HD024082 S\nBättre elstöd"]:::party_s
@@ -417,27 +417,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-battle-map">Mermaid: Policy Battle Map<a class="" aria
     style Migration fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
     style Arms fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-1 (Governmental stability), PIR-3 (Policy reform trajectory), PIR-5 (Electoral dynamics)</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story">Key Judgment KJ-1: Opposition Fragmentation is the Dominant Political Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story">Key Judgment KJ-1: Opposition Fragmentation is the Dominant Political Story<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1-opposition-fragmentation-is-the-dominant-political-story"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The most significant intelligence output from this week's motions is not any individual policy clash but the structural fragmentation of the centre-left opposition. S (HD024082), V (HD024092), and MP (HD024098) all oppose the same government proposition (2025/26:236) but cannot agree on a common alternative. This fragmentation is observable, documented, and structurally persistent — reflecting genuine policy disagreements about the relative priority of distributional justice (V), environmental protection (MP), and fiscal competence (S). The pattern is likely to persist through the 2026 election campaign.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: Three separate motion documents, no joint sponsors, no shared analytical framework. Cited sources: HD024082 (riksdagen.se), HD024092 (riksdagen.se), HD024098 (riksdagen.se). [B1] Admiralty code.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated">Key Judgment KJ-2: Government's Legislative Program is Expert-Isolated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated">Key Judgment KJ-2: Government's Legislative Program is Expert-Isolated<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2-governments-legislative-program-is-expert-isolated"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The government faces unprecedented expert agency opposition to its supplementary budget: Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet, and Trafikverket all opposed the fuel tax reduction in remiss (cited in HD024098). Simultaneously, Lagrådet explicitly advised against the deportation law (cited in HD024090). This double expert-isolation — on fiscal and legal dimensions simultaneously — is a significant indicator of reduced policy quality and increased implementation risk.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: Five agencies cited by name in HD024098 [A2]; Lagrådet rejection cited in HD024090 [A1]. Independent confirmation from multiple institutional sources.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground">Key Judgment KJ-3: Migration Policy Arena is the Key 2026 Electoral Battleground<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground">Key Judgment KJ-3: Migration Policy Arena is the Key 2026 Electoral Battleground<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3-migration-policy-arena-is-the-key-2026-electoral-battleground"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH</strong></p>
 <p>The week's migration motions (HD024089, HD024090, HD024095, HD024097, HD024080, HD024079, HD024077, HD024086) reveal that C occupies the most strategically exposed position: broadly accepting both the deportation framework and the Mottagandelag while opposing specific elements. This makes C a plausible coalition partner for either a right-wing or centre-left government in 2026 — and therefore a pivotal swing actor whose final positioning will be decisive.</p>
 <p><em>Evidence</em>: HD024089 (C accepting Mottagandelag broadly); HD024095 (C accepting deportation framework conditionally). [B1] Admiralty. PIR-3 handoff: track C's final vote on SfU committee reports.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle">PIR Handoff for Next Intelligence Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle">PIR Handoff for Next Intelligence Cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1 (Government stability)</strong>: Monitor SD's FiU vote on prop. 2025/26:236. Any SD amendment demands = first crack in coalition.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-3 (Policy reform)</strong>: Track FiU and SfU committee dates. If FiU fast-tracks before May 15, opposition loses deliberation window.</li>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-for-next-intelligence-cycle">PIR Handoff for Next Intelli
 <li><strong>EEI</strong>: Watch for any joint S/V/MP press statement on energy (would signal H1 coordination thesis); watch for constitutional complaint filing after deportation law passes.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -478,9 +478,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Validity</th><th>Risk if wrong</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SD will vote with government on all four propositions</td><td>HIGH confidence</td><td>If wrong: major coalition crisis</td></tr><tr><td>C will vote with government on migration but not energy</td><td>MEDIUM confidence</td><td>If C abstains on energy, slight chance of budget modification</td></tr><tr><td>No joint S/V/MP opposition motion filed</td><td>HIGH confidence (documented)</td><td>If a joint addendum appears, thesis changes</td></tr><tr><td>Courts will not issue interim stay on deportation law</td><td>HIGH confidence short-term</td><td>If ECtHR acts unusually fast, scenario 3 activated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-significance-matrix">DIW-Weighted Significance Matrix<a
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Depth</th><th>Intelligence</th><th>Width</th><th>DIW Score</th><th>Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD024082 (S)</td><td>0.92</td><td>0.88</td><td>0.87</td><td><strong>0.89</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD024092 (V)</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.80</td><td><strong>0.83</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD024090 (V)</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.81</td><td>0.77</td><td><strong>0.80</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD024098 (MP)</td><td>0.80</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.76</td><td><strong>0.78</strong></td><td>P2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024096 (MP)</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.72</td><td><strong>0.75</strong></td><td>P2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD024089 (C)</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.70</td><td>0.68</td><td><strong>0.70</strong></td><td>P2 — High</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD024095 (C)</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.65</td><td>0.62</td><td><strong>0.65</strong></td><td>P2 — Medium</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD024097 (MP)</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.63</td><td>0.60</td><td><strong>0.62</strong></td><td>P2 — Medium</td></tr><tr><td>9–14</td><td>Cluster (low-weight)</td><td>0.40–0.55</td><td>0.40–0.50</td><td>0.42–0.52</td><td><strong>0.40–0.55</strong></td><td>P3 — Standard</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>DIW = Depth × Intelligence × Width (normalised 0–1)</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ranked-items-with-evidence">Ranked Items with Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-items-with-evidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranked-items-with-evidence">Ranked Items with Evidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranked-items-with-evidence"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD024082</strong> — S motion on Extra ändringsbudget: Mikael Damberg och Socialdemokraterna kräver ett rättvisare elstöd för 800,000 bostadsrättsinnehavare som exkluderats av regeringens design. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] <code>[B2]</code> IMPACT: HIGH — defines S budget profile pre-election.</p>
@@ -601,13 +601,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranked-items-with-evidence">Ranked Items with Evidence<a class="" ari
 </li>
 </ol>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Downside risk</strong>: If FiU adds conditions making the fuel tax cut contingent on SD support for other measures, the entire budget picture shifts.</li>
 <li><strong>Upside</strong>: If the Mottagandelag passes with C support but faces constitutional review, the judicial dimension adds a new policy layer.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d", "textColor": "#e0e0e0"}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "DIW Significance Scores — 2026-04-23 Motions"
@@ -617,21 +617,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid: Significance Rank Diagram
     line [0.89, 0.83, 0.80, 0.78, 0.75, 0.70, 0.65, 0.62]</pre>
 <p><em>Sources: riksdagen.se document metadata + full-text analysis. Admiralty [B2] for document-derived scores; [A2] for multi-agency corroborated items.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice">Primary Frame War: "Relief" vs. "Justice"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice">Primary Frame War: "Relief" vs. "Justice"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-frame-war-relief-vs-justice"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant narrative battle this week is between the government's "relief" frame and the opposition's "justice" frame:</p>
 <p><strong>Government frame (Tidö)</strong>: The supplementary budget provides immediate energy price relief to Swedish households during a difficult economic period. The fuel tax cut is a targeted, temporary measure to help families who depend on their cars.</p>
 <p><strong>V/MP counter-frame (HD024092, HD024098)</strong>: The relief is mis-targeted — it benefits high-income households disproportionately. The five expert agencies said the measure is economically inefficient and climate-damaging. Technical competence arguments.</p>
 <p><strong>S counter-frame (HD024082)</strong>: The relief has design flaws — 800,000 cooperative housing households are excluded. S offers better design, not rejection of relief.</p>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: The government's "relief" frame is emotionally simpler and will likely dominate media coverage. The opposition's counter-frames require voters to process distributional data (V) or engage with design complexity (S). In a pre-election environment, simple beats complex.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence">Secondary Frame: "Rule of Law" vs. "Deterrence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence">Secondary Frame: "Rule of Law" vs. "Deterrence"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-frame-rule-of-law-vs-deterrence"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>V/MP frame (HD024090)</strong>: The deportation law is unconstitutional, legally incoherent, and Lagrådet-rejected. "Rättssäkerheten" (rule of law) is under attack.</p>
 <p><strong>C frame (HD024095)</strong>: Conditional acceptance: the framework is legitimate but must include procedural safeguards. "Proportionality."</p>
 <p><strong>SD/M frame (absent from motions — expected government position)</strong>: "Deterrence works. We need firm signals to prevent migration."</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-media-amplification-probability">Media Amplification Probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-amplification-probability"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-media-amplification-probability">Media Amplification Probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-amplification-probability"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -669,14 +669,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-media-amplification-probability">Media Amplification Probability<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Topic</th><th>Predicted amplification</th><th>Reason</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S's design-flaw argument (HD024082)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>800,000 households = concrete, large, sympathetic group</td></tr><tr><td>V's RUT distributional analysis (HD024092)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Requires some media sophistication to convey</td></tr><tr><td>MP's five-agency citation (HD024098)</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Expert opinion always amplifiable; threshold risk angle also newsworthy</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet rejection of deportation law (HD024090)</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Institutional conflict = classic news story</td></tr><tr><td>Arms export ban motion (HD024096)</td><td>LOW</td><td>Less immediate relevance to domestic agenda</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-social-media-hypothesis">Social Media Hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-hypothesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-social-media-hypothesis">Social Media Hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-hypothesis"></a></h3>
 <p>On platforms prioritising emotional resonance (Instagram, TikTok), the "800,000 households excluded" narrative (S) and "Lagrådet says it's illegal" narrative (V/MP) are the most shareable. The distributional data in V's motion requires more text than a social post allows.</p>
 <p><em>Note: No social media monitoring data available. Assessment is structural inference from content analysis [C3].</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties">Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties">Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-parliamentary-parties">Lens 1: Parliamentary Parties<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Position</th><th>Key Actor</th><th>Primary Motion</th><th>Strategic Interest</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S — Socialdemokraterna</td><td>Oppose fuel cut design; demand targeted electricity support</td><td>Mikael Damberg</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Fiscal competence credibility; 2026 election positioning</td></tr><tr><td>V — Vänsterpartiet</td><td>Oppose fuel cut entirely; reject deportation law</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar, Tony Haddou</td><td>HD024092, HD024090</td><td>Distributional justice; human rights base mobilisation</td></tr><tr><td>MP — Miljöpartiet</td><td>Oppose fuel cut on climate; oppose arms export liberalisation</td><td>Janine Alm Ericson, Jacob Risberg, Annika Hirvonen</td><td>HD024098, HD024096, HD024097</td><td>Climate mandate; green voter retention</td></tr><tr><td>C — Centerpartiet</td><td>Conditionally accept deportation and reception frameworks</td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen</td><td>HD024089, HD024095</td><td>Swing-voter appeal; rural municipal interests</td></tr><tr><td>SD — Sverigedemokraterna</td><td>Expected to support government across all four propositions</td><td>(no motions filed in this cluster)</td><td>—</td><td>Coalition stability; border control narrative</td></tr><tr><td>M, L, KD</td><td>Expected to support government</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Government parties</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies">Lens 2: Civil Society &#x26; Expert Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies">Lens 2: Civil Society &#x26; Expert Bodies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-civil-society--expert-bodies">Lens 2: Civil Society &#x26; Exp
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Position</th><th>Basis</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Explicitly advised against prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td><td>Official legal opinion</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Konjunkturinstitutet</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut in remiss</td><td>Climate/economic analysis</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Naturvårdsverket</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Environmental mandate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>2030-sekretariatet</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Climate transition mandate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Statens energimyndighet</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Energy security analysis</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Trafikverket</td><td>Opposed fuel tax cut</td><td>Transport sector mandate</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Remiss bodies on HD024090</td><td>Extensive criticism of deportation reform</td><td>Rule-of-law analysis</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations">Lens 3: Voters &#x26; Affected Populations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations">Lens 3: Voters &#x26; Affected Populations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-3-voters--affected-populations">Lens 3: Voters &#x26; Affected P
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>Affected by</th><th>Stakes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>~800,000 bostadsrättsinnehavare with shared electricity</td><td>S motion HD024082 — excluded from electricity support</td><td>SEK hundreds per household per month</td></tr><tr><td>Migrants who arrived in Sweden before age 15</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:235 removes their protection</td><td>Potential deportation risk</td></tr><tr><td>Low-income households</td><td>V motion HD024092 — fuel price relief is proportional to car use and income</td><td>5:1 benefit asymmetry per RUT analysis</td></tr><tr><td>Environment-concerned voters (~25–30% of electorate)</td><td>MP motion HD024098 — climate signal from fuel tax cut</td><td>Long-term fossil fuel dependency</td></tr><tr><td>Asylum seekers and municipalities</td><td>Reception law prop. 2025/26:229</td><td>Municipal welfare, area restrictions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Narrative Agents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Narrative Agents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-4-media--narrative-agents">Lens 4: Media &#x26; Narrative Agents
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Promoted by</th><th>Risk for opposition</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Relief for hard-pressed households"</td><td>Government + friendly media</td><td>Makes opposition seem out of touch</td></tr><tr><td>"Government favours the wealthy"</td><td>V (RUT data)</td><td>Resonant but S hasn't adopted it</td></tr><tr><td>"Climate backslide"</td><td>MP + green media</td><td>True but niche; low penetration in election swing voters</td></tr><tr><td>"Rule of law erosion"</td><td>V + legal NGOs</td><td>Strong for base mobilisation; limited mainstream appeal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-international-actors">Lens 5: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-international-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-international-actors">Lens 5: International Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-international-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-5-international-actors">Lens 5: International Actors<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Concern</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>Potential state aid issues with selective electricity support</td><td>General EU energy rules [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>Arms recipient states</td><td>Stricter Swedish export controls (MP demands) would restrict flows</td><td>HD024096 — explicit demand for export bans [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>UNHCR / EU migration agencies</td><td>Stricter deportation thresholds and new reception framework</td><td>HD024090, HD024089 [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-institutional-actors">Lens 6: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-institutional-actors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-institutional-actors">Lens 6: Institutional Actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-institutional-actors"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-institutional-actors">Lens 6: Institutional Actors<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>Role</th><th>Interest</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU (Finansutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024082, HD024092, HD024098</td><td>Budget supplementary vote timing</td></tr><tr><td>SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024089–090, 095, 097, 076, 080</td><td>Migration reform timeline</td></tr><tr><td>UU (Utrikesutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024096, HD024091</td><td>Arms export framework</td></tr><tr><td>AU (Arbetsmarknadsutskottet)</td><td>Processes HD024079, 077, 086</td><td>Labour/housing reception motions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 graph LR
     Lagrådet["Lagrådet\n[A1]"]:::authority --> V_Dep["V Motion\nHD024090"]:::party_v
@@ -939,93 +939,93 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     classDef evidence fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     classDef committee fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0,stroke:#ff006e</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-framework">Indicator Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>This file tracks 12 dated indicators across 4 horizons (30-day, 90-day, 6-month, 12-month) that would confirm or refute the key judgments in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026">Horizon 1: 30-Day Indicators (May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax">IND-01: FiU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026">Horizon 1: 30-Day Indicators (May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1-30-day-indicators-may-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax">IND-01: FiU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-01-fiu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526236-fuel-tax"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: ~May 5, 2026 (FiU scheduled)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Does FiU adopt S's design amendment (HD024082)? Yes = KJ-1 partially refuted (opposition succeeded). No = KJ-1 confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Trigger threshold</strong>: Any S, V, or MP amendment adopted by FiU majority</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A2] that vote will occur; MEDIUM [B2] that government amendments will prevail</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice">IND-02: Skatteverket Implementation Notice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice">IND-02: Skatteverket Implementation Notice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-02-skatteverket-implementation-notice"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: ~May 1, 2026 (law comes into force)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Does official implementation guidance include or exclude cooperative housing (<em>bostadsrättsföreningar</em>)? Exclusion confirmed = HD024082 validated; political cost to government elevated.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that notice will be published</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law">IND-03: SfU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law">IND-03: SfU Committee Vote on prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-03-sfu-committee-vote-on-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: ~May 12, 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Does SfU include any C amendments? C amendment adopted = coalition complexity signal.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that vote will occur</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026">Horizon 2: 90-Day Indicators (June–July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law">IND-04: First Deportation Under New Law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026">Horizon 2: 90-Day Indicators (June–July 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2-90-day-indicators-junejuly-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law">IND-04: First Deportation Under New Law<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-04-first-deportation-under-new-law"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: June–July 2026 (Migrationsverket implementation)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Is the first deportation case published? Does it produce a court challenge?</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2] that early cases will be filed quickly</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold">IND-05: MP Poll Result (4% threshold)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold">IND-05: MP Poll Result (4% threshold)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-05-mp-poll-result-4-threshold"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Any major poll, June–July 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: MP at/above 4% = electoral calculation shifts. MP below 4% = coalition arithmetic for S+V more difficult.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that polls will be published; threshold outcome is MEDIUM [C3]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement">IND-06: S+V+MP Joint Election Platform Statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement">IND-06: S+V+MP Joint Election Platform Statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-06-svmp-joint-election-platform-statement"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: June 2026 (traditional alliance-building period)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: A joint platform on energy would refute H1 (fragmentation is strategic differentiation) and confirm H1-alt (genuine coordination).</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B3] that some form of coordination statement emerges; quality uncertain</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026">Horizon 3: 6-Month Indicators (September–October 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend">IND-07: 2026 Election Polling Trend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026">Horizon 3: 6-Month Indicators (September–October 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3-6-month-indicators-septemberoctober-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend">IND-07: 2026 Election Polling Trend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-07-2026-election-polling-trend"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Ongoing, key snapshot September 2026</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: If government coalition (M+SD+KD+L) polling above 175 seats → KJ-1 (fragmentation = government advantage) confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that polls will be published</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration">IND-08: C's Final Alliance Declaration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration">IND-08: C's Final Alliance Declaration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-08-cs-final-alliance-declaration"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: C autumn congress, September 2026 (est.)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: C declares coalition preference. C → left = major political realignment. C → right = status quo confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2] that C will clarify before election campaign</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development">IND-09: Arms Export Policy Development<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development">IND-09: Arms Export Policy Development<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-09-arms-export-policy-development"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Summer/autumn 2026 (Riksdag follows up HD024096)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Any governmental communication on arms export secrecy provisions (opposed by MP in HD024096). Government concession = small HD024096 victory.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: LOW [C3]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027">Horizon 4: 12-Month Indicators (Spring 2027)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration">IND-10: ECtHR Case Registration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027">Horizon 4: 12-Month Indicators (Spring 2027)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4-12-month-indicators-spring-2027"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration">IND-10: ECtHR Case Registration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-10-ecthr-case-registration"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Autumn 2026–Spring 2027 (cases filed after law implementation)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: ECtHR registers case against Sweden under ECHR Art. 8 related to prop. 2025/26:235. Registration = medium-term legal risk elevated (KJ-2 confirmed on legal dimension).</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report">IND-11: Migrationsverket Capacity Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report">IND-11: Migrationsverket Capacity Report<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-11-migrationsverket-capacity-report"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: Q1 2027 (annual report)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Migrationsverket reports implementation difficulties with new Mottagandelagen. Friction confirmed = C's HD024089 concerns validated.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM [B3]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations">IND-12: Post-Election Coalition Negotiations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations">IND-12: Post-Election Coalition Negotiations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ind-12-post-election-coalition-negotiations"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expected date</strong>: September–November 2026 (post-election)</li>
 <li><strong>Indicator</strong>: Who negotiates with whom? If S+C talks emerge seriously, KJ-3 (C as pivotal actor) fully confirmed. If Tidö 2.0 forms without modification, KJ-1 (fragmentation cost opposition the election) confirmed.</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] that negotiations will occur</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-summary-matrix">Indicator Summary Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-summary-matrix">Indicator Summary Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-summary-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark"}}%%
 gantt
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -1047,29 +1047,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-summary-matrix">Indicator Summary Matrix<a class="" aria-hi
     IND-11 Migrationsverket rpt :milestone, 2027-02-01, 0d
     IND-12 Coalition talks      :2026-10-01, 60d</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome">Scenarios for Spring 2026 Parliamentary Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely">Scenario 1: Government Wins All Four Propositions (Most Likely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome">Scenarios for Spring 2026 Parliamentary Outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenarios-for-spring-2026-parliamentary-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely">Scenario 1: Government Wins All Four Propositions (Most Likely)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1-government-wins-all-four-propositions-most-likely"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 65% [C2]<br>
 <strong>Narrative</strong>: SD and the four-party government coalition pass prop. 2025/26:235, 236, 228, and 229 intact. Opposition motions (HD024082–098, HD024090–097, HD024096, HD024089–091) are voted down in committee and plenary. The fuel tax cut takes effect 1 May 2026. Deportation rules tighten 1 September 2026.<br>
 <strong>Why likely</strong>: SD has been reliable since the Tidö agreement; no by-election pressure; C partially supporting migration proposals.<br>
 <strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Monitor FiU committee vote date (est. late April/early May 2026). If S/V/MP cannot coordinate to delay, Scenario 1 is confirmed.<br>
 <strong>Impact on opposition</strong>: Deepens fragmentation narrative; V/MP locked into protest stance; S under pressure to differentiate from V.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible">Scenario 2: Budget Propositions Modified — C Demands Concessions (Plausible)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible">Scenario 2: Budget Propositions Modified — C Demands Concessions (Plausible)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2-budget-propositions-modified--c-demands-concessions-plausible"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 22% [C3]<br>
 <strong>Narrative</strong>: C leverages its SfU position to demand changes to the Mottagandelag area-restriction provisions (HD024089) in exchange for abstention on the fuel tax supplementary. Government makes minor concessions. S, V, MP motions still voted down. Electricity support design is tweaked but 800k cooperative households remain partially excluded.<br>
 <strong>Why plausible</strong>: C has a track record of extracting symbolic wins on migration (see 2023 Tidö addendum). Niels Paarup-Petersen's motion (HD024089) is specifically calibrated to be acceptable as a negotiating position.<br>
 <strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Any informal contact between C leadership and government whips in the two weeks before FiU vote.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Partial vindication for C; S/V/MP still lose but narrative shifts to "C saves municipal welfare."</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact">Scenario 3: Lagrådet Rejection Creates Constitutional Crisis on Deportation Law (Low probability, High impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact">Scenario 3: Lagrådet Rejection Creates Constitutional Crisis on Deportation Law (Low probability, High impact)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3-lagrådet-rejection-creates-constitutional-crisis-on-deportation-law-low-probability-high-impact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Probability</strong>: 13% [D3]<br>
 <strong>Narrative</strong>: After prop. 2025/26:235 passes, an immediate constitutional challenge is mounted by legal NGOs citing Lagrådet's opinion. The Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) issues an interim stay on the deportation expansion for those who arrived before age 15. Government embarrassed; V (HD024090, Tony Haddou) vindicated. This delays implementation beyond the September 2026 target and becomes a major election issue.<br>
 <strong>Why low probability</strong>: Courts rarely issue interim stays on legislation; Lagrådet opinions are advisory, not binding. But the specific removal of childhood-arrival protections is a ECHR Art. 8 (family life) flashpoint.<br>
 <strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Filing of a formal constitutional complaint within 30 days of the law passing (est. August 2026); any ECHR provisional measures request.<br>
 <strong>Impact</strong>: Severely damages government credibility on rule of law; boosts V/MP in polls; S gains from not opposing in the same extreme terms.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 pie title Scenario Probability Distribution — Spring 2026 Legislative Outcome
     "Scenario 1: Government wins all" : 65
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
     "Scenario 3: Constitutional crisis" : 13</pre>
 <p><em>Probabilities sum to 100%. All scenarios based on parliamentary pattern analysis and motion text; no insider information used. Confidence [C2–D3] reflects the limited predictive base for Swedish coalition dynamics 6+ weeks out.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators per Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1115,9 +1115,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-leading-indicators-per-scenario">Leading Indicators per Scenario<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Triggers</th><th>Timeline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FiU committee vote date announced</td><td>Scenario 1 or 2 pathway</td><td>Late April 2026</td></tr><tr><td>C leadership statement on HD024089 outcome</td><td>Scenario 2 possible</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Legal NGO constitutional filing on prop. 2025/26:235</td><td>Scenario 3 activated</td><td>August 2026</td></tr><tr><td>Government press release modifying electricity support</td><td>Scenario 2 outcome</td><td>May 2026</td></tr><tr><td>SD amendment demand on energy proposition</td><td>New Scenario possible</td><td>April–May 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1197,15 +1197,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-Dimension Risk Register<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Description</th><th>Likelihood (1–5)</th><th>Impact (1–5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Trend</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01</td><td>All opposition motions voted down, zero policy change</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>SD-government bloc solid; structural 2025/26 pattern [B1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-02</td><td>Fuel tax cut passes but electricity support design remains inequitable</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>S motion HD024082 identifies 800k excluded households [B1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-03</td><td>Stricter deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235) creates mass court challenges</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>Lagrådet rejection + extensive remiss criticism [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-04</td><td>Opposition fragmentation deepens ahead of 2026 elections</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td><strong>15</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>No joint motions across budget cluster; C partial government support [B1]</td></tr><tr><td>R-05</td><td>Arms export modernisation creates diplomatic risk with EU partners</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Stable</td><td>MP HD024096 + remiss citations on third-country diversion [B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-06</td><td>Mottagandelag area restrictions ruled unconstitutional</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td><strong>8</strong></td><td>Uncertain</td><td>C HD024089 raises kommunal självstyre concerns [C3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-07</td><td>Climate credibility damage from fuel tax cut undermines Swedish COP commitments</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td><strong>9</strong></td><td>Rising</td><td>MP HD024098 + agency consensus [A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-risks-li--10">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--10"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15">R-04 — Opposition Fragmentation [HIGH RISK, L×I = 15]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks-li--10">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15">R-04 — Opposition Fragmentation [HIGH RISK, L×I = 15]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04--opposition-fragmentation-high-risk-li--15"></a></h4>
 <p>The most severe risk for democratic accountability: when S, V, and MP cannot agree on a budget alternative, the government faces no unified opposition. Evidence: three separate motions (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) against the same government proposition, each with a different analytical framework and policy demand. This is structurally worse than the 2022–23 budget period when S and V coordinated more frequently.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading chain</strong>: Fragmentation → no alternative budget → government wins FiU vote → fuel tax implemented → climate agencies increase criticism → media shifts to "government vs experts" framing → opposition fails to capture narrative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each">R-02 + R-03 — Social Policy Double Jeopardy [HIGH RISK, L×I = 12 each]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each">R-02 + R-03 — Social Policy Double Jeopardy [HIGH RISK, L×I = 12 each]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-02--r-03--social-policy-double-jeopardy-high-risk-li--12-each"></a></h4>
 <p>Two simultaneous social policy risks create a compound exposure: (1) electricity support design flaw disproportionately affects cooperative housing (S: HD024082); (2) deportation law challenged as unconstitutional by Lagrådet with likely court litigation (V: HD024090). Either alone is manageable; together they strain public trust in government competence.</p>
 <p><strong>Posterior probability</strong>: Given Lagrådet's explicit rejection and the 2022 reform being less than 4 years old, probability of at least one court challenge to the deportation rules within 12 months of implementation (Sep 2026) is estimated at ~55% [C3 — analyst judgement].</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map">Mermaid: Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map">Mermaid: Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk Heat Map — Opposition Motions 2026-04-23
@@ -1224,33 +1224,33 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-risk-heat-map">Mermaid: Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden=
     R-06 Unconstitutional: [0.42, 0.78]</pre>
 <p><em>Confidence: MEDIUM [B2–C3]. Risk scores based on parliamentary patterns + primary documents.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23 | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [B2]<br>
 <strong>Framing</strong>: Strengths/Weaknesses of the <em>opposition bloc's</em> motion strategy; Opportunities/Threats from <em>their</em> political perspective.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Expert agency backing for climate framing</strong>: MP's HD024098 cites Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet and Trafikverket as opposing the fuel tax cut — an unusually strong expert consensus. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098] <code>[A2]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet criticism of deportation law</strong>: V's HD024090 highlights that Lagrådet explicitly advised against prop. 2025/26:235, strengthening the human rights argument. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090] <code>[A1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Distributional evidence for V</strong>: V's HD024092 invokes RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158 + dnr 2025:1607) showing the government's reforms disproportionately benefit top-income deciles. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092] <code>[A2]</code></li>
 <li><strong>S credibility on electricity design flaw</strong>: 800,000 households in shared-grid housing cooperatives excluded from S-identified design flaw, giving S a concrete, relatable grievance. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Fragmentation undermines narrative unity</strong>: S, V, and MP all oppose the budget supplementary but offer incompatible alternatives (different electricity support models, different rationales). No single motion by multiple parties. [HD024082, HD024092, HD024098 — three separate dok_ids, same proposition, zero joint motion] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>C defection on migration</strong>: C (HD024089, HD024095) broadly accepts both the new Mottagandelag and the deportation framework with modifications, breaking centre-left solidarity. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089, HD024095] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>No budget alternative quantified</strong>: S (HD024082) demands better electricity support design but does not specify a costed alternative in the motion text. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082] <code>[B2]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Arms export motion (HD024096) unlikely to pass</strong>: With SD, M, L, KD backing government arms policy, MP's export ban demand is politically isolated. [riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096] <code>[B2]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Election framing window</strong>: The 2026 election provides a six-month window to build a joint opposition narrative around energy transition + distributional justice — the motion cluster provides raw material. [aggregate assessment, no single dok_id] <code>[C3]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Constitutional review potential</strong>: If Mottagandelag area-restrictions violate kommunal självstyre principles, judicial review could embarrass the government. [HD024089 cites constitutional concerns; riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089] <code>[C3]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Agency credibility cascade</strong>: If Konjunkturinstitutet issues a formal advisory against the fuel tax (beyond the remiss stage), it upgrades the opposition's credibility posture. [HD024098 — remiss phase already hostile] <code>[B3]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet precedent on deportation</strong>: If courts challenge prop. 2025/26:235 implementation (as Lagrådet suggested they might), V's motion record becomes prescient. [HD024090] <code>[C3]</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SD-government bloc solidarity</strong>: SD's reliable coalition support for the government means all three motion clusters will likely be voted down. [structural observation based on riksmöte 2025/26 voting patterns] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 <li><strong>Economic relief narrative overrides climate concerns</strong>: Rising energy prices give the government a populist justification; opposition parties risk appearing elitist by opposing fuel price relief. [HD024092, HD024098 acknowledge this framing risk] <code>[B2]</code></li>
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <li><strong>Fast legislative timeline</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:236 fuel tax cut effective 1 May 2026 — if FiU moves quickly, motions may have minimal deliberation time. [HD024092 — motion text references 1 May start date] <code>[B1]</code></li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1281,10 +1281,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths (Expert consensus, Lagrådet)</th><th>Weaknesses (Fragmentation, no costed alt.)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong> (Election framing, constitutional review)</td><td>SO: Build joint climate narrative using agency consensus as credibility anchor</td><td>WO: Prioritise one common budget alternative and reduce duplication</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong> (SD solidarity, relief narrative)</td><td>ST: Use Lagrådet record to anchor rule-of-law argument in media</td><td>WT: Risk of all motions failing with no political gain; need pre-committee vote coordination</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy">Cross-SWOT: Migration vs Energy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy">Cross-SWOT: Migration vs Energy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-migration-vs-energy"></a></h3>
 <p>The opposition's tactical problem: energy opponents (V, MP) and migration opponents (all but C) are the same parties, but their framing strategies diverge. MP emphasises expert consensus; V emphasises distributional justice; S emphasises design quality. A unified "alternative governance" framing would require S to explicitly endorse V's distributional frame — currently politically infeasible.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-swot-summary">Mermaid: SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-swot-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-swot-summary">Mermaid: SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-swot-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title SWOT Quadrant — Opposition Motion Strategy
@@ -1304,11 +1304,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-swot-summary">Mermaid: SWOT Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="t
     Relief narrative: [0.82, 0.18]</pre>
 <p><em>Admiralty codes assigned per evidence type: government documents [A1], corroborated reports [A2], single-source official [B1], peer-reviewed public [B2], unconfirmed open-source [C3]</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 <p>Threats assessed against <strong>democratic accountability norms</strong> and <strong>opposition party viability</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat">T-1: Legislative Steamrolling (Primary Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat">T-1: Legislative Steamrolling (Primary Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Institutional integrity</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Tidewater coalition (M, SD, KD, L) + occasional C</li>
@@ -1317,7 +1317,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-1-legislative-steamrolling-primary-threat">T-1: Legislative Steamro
 <li><strong>TTP analog</strong>: "Vote dominance" — structural majority used without negotiation</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat">T-2: Distributional Justice Erosion (Social Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat">T-2: Distributional Justice Erosion (Social Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Social cohesion</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Government fiscal policy</li>
@@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-2-distributional-justice-erosion-social-threat">T-2: Distributional
 <li><strong>Kill chain stage</strong>: Policy formulation → implementation → distributional outcome → public trust erosion</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat">T-3: Constitutional Overreach on Deportation (Rule-of-Law Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat">T-3: Constitutional Overreach on Deportation (Rule-of-Law Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Constitutional order</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Government (prop. 2025/26:235)</li>
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-3-constitutional-overreach-on-deportation-rule-of-law-threat">T-3:
 <li><strong>TTP</strong>: "Incremental erosion" of judicial review rights</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat">T-4: Climate Policy Regression (Environmental Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat">T-4: Climate Policy Regression (Environmental Threat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Category</strong>: Long-term governance</li>
 <li><strong>Actor</strong>: Government energy policy</li>
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-4-climate-policy-regression-environmental-threat">T-4: Climate Poli
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation">Attack Tree: Democratic Accountability Degradation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation">Attack Tree: Democratic Accountability Degradation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "edgeLabelBackground": "#1a1e3d"}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     ROOT["⚠️ Degraded democratic accountability"]:::critical
@@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-democratic-accountability-degradation">Attack Tree: Democ
     classDef threat fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0,stroke:#ff006e
     classDef evidence fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0,stroke:#00d9ff</pre>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1423,299 +1423,299 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-Style TTP Mapping<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p><em>Political Threat Actor framework adapted from MITRE ATT&#x26;CK for political intelligence purposes. All threats are of a legislative/policy nature.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024077">HD024077<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024077"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024077-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024077
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024079">HD024079<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024079"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024079
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-1">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-1">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-1">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024080">HD024080<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024080"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024080
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-2">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-2">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-2">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024082<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Socialdemokraterna (S) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Mikael Damberg<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:236)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed by riksdagen.se document access, primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion opposing prop. 2025/26:236's supplementary budget. Core argument: the electricity support scheme has a design flaw that excludes approximately 800,000 cooperative housing (<em>bostadsrätt</em>) households. S proposes amending the design to include these households, not cancelling the energy support overall.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-3">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 8/10. This is the flagship opposition budget motion from the largest opposition party, filed by the former Prime Minister (Damberg). It will attract maximal media attention and define S's pre-election fiscal narrative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-3">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-3">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-3"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>800,000 cooperative housing households are excluded from electricity support by a design flaw.</li>
 <li>The design flaw is amendable — does not require rejecting the entire proposition.</li>
 <li>S positions itself as the "competent alternative" that would fix, not block, energy support.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024092 (V: reject entire fuel tax cut), HD024098 (MP: same rejection) — shows S is the moderate among the three opposition actors.</li>
 <li>Links to <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code> — S's amendment (if adopted by FiU) would require government concession.</li>
 <li>Links to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> IND-01 (FiU vote) and IND-02 (Skatteverket implementation notice).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-3"></a></h3>
 <p>The exact number of excluded households (800,000) is S's figure — not independently verified from Skatteverket data. [B2]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024086">HD024086<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024086"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024086
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-4">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-4">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-4">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024087">HD024087<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024087"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024087
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-5">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-5">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-5">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024089">HD024089<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024089"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024089<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Centerpartiet (C) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Niels Paarup-Petersen<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to new Mottagandelagen)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source; full text fetched</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion on the new reception law (<em>Mottagandelagen</em>). C broadly accepts the framework but opposes specific provisions: area restrictions on asylum seekers and the absence of guaranteed emergency welfare rights for municipalities hosting large reception centres.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-6">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. Reveals C's pragmatic liberalism on migration — neither fully supporting the restrictive government framework nor opposing it entirely. This is the key "swing vote" document in the migration cluster.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-6">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-6">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-6"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>C accepts the Mottagandelagen framework broadly — Sweden needs a new reception framework.</li>
 <li>Area restrictions on asylum seekers are disproportionate and should be removed.</li>
 <li>Municipalities must have guaranteed emergency welfare rights when hosting reception centres (financial protection for local authorities).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-1">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-1">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024095 (C: same conditional acceptance pattern on deportation law)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code> §Mottagandelagen vote prediction</li>
 <li>Links to <code>implementation-feasibility.md</code> — C's municipal welfare demand is noted as unlikely to be accepted</li>
 <li>Links to <code>voter-segmentation.md</code> §C section — rural pragmatic liberal base</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Whether C will press its amendments to a committee vote or accept the law without amendment is uncertain. [B3]. The financial scale of C's municipal welfare demand is not costed.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024090">HD024090<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024090"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024090<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Vänsterpartiet (V) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Tony Haddou<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:235)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion demanding rejection of the deportation law (prop. 2025/26:235) on rule-of-law grounds. V cites Lagrådet's explicit rejection of the proposition as evidence of constitutional deficiency.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-7">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-7">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 9/10. Highest-stakes motion in the migration cluster. Lagrådet citation gives it maximum institutional legitimacy for rule-of-law argument.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-7">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-7">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-7"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Lagrådet explicitly rejected prop. 2025/26:235 as "clearly ill-advised."</li>
 <li>The law targets individuals who arrived in Sweden before age 15 — ECHR Art. 8 protection is particularly strong for this group.</li>
 <li>V demands the proposition be withdrawn entirely.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-2">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-2">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024095 (C: conditional acceptance — weaker stance than V's full rejection)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> KJ-2 (expert isolation of government's legislative program)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>historical-parallels.md</code> §Lagrådet Rejections</li>
 <li>Links to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> IND-10 (ECtHR case registration)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Lagrådet opinion text not independently fetched — cited as reported in V's motion. [B2]. "Clearly ill-advised" quote is V's paraphrase, not the verbatim Lagrådet text.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024091">HD024091<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024091"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024091
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-8">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-8">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-8">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-8">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024092">HD024092<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024092"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024092<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Vänsterpartiet (V) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Nooshi Dadgostar<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:236)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion opposing the fuel tax cut element of prop. 2025/26:236. V argues the measure is distributionally regressive, citing RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158) showing that the benefit accrues disproportionately to high-income households (5:1 income-skew ratio).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-9">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-9">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-9"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. Strong analytical foundation via RUT cite. V is positioning itself as the distributional-justice voice in the opposition.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-9">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-9">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-9"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>RUT dnr 2026:158 shows the fuel tax cut benefits high-income households 5x more than low-income households.</li>
 <li>The measure is economically inefficient and regressive.</li>
 <li>V proposes rejecting the fuel tax cut and redirecting funds to targeted household support.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-3">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-3">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024098 (MP agrees on rejection; V and MP aligned on outcome, not on alternative)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>voter-segmentation.md</code> §V section — distributional argument targets different voter segment than S</li>
 <li>Links to <code>devils-advocate.md</code> H2 — electoral vs. economic rationale</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-9"></a></h3>
 <p>RUT dnr 2026:158 document not independently fetched — cited as reported in V's motion. [B2]. V's proposed alternative (targeted household support) is not costed in the motion.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024095">HD024095<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024095"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024095<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Centerpartiet (C) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Niels Paarup-Petersen<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:235)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source; full text fetched</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion on the deportation law. Unlike V (HD024090), C does not demand full rejection — instead accepts the framework conditionally, demanding that deportation orders include adequate procedural safeguards and proportionality assessment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-10">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-10">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. C's conditional acceptance is politically consequential — it means C will likely vote for the law despite reservations, giving the government a margin of safety beyond its bare 176 majority.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-10">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-10">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-10"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>The deportation framework has legitimacy — Sweden must be able to deport criminals.</li>
 <li>Individual cases must receive proportionality assessment (balancing Article 8 ECHR rights).</li>
 <li>C does not endorse V/MP's full rejection.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-4">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-4">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024090 (V: full rejection — starkly different from C's position)</li>
 <li>Links to HD024089 (C: parallel conditional-acceptance pattern on Mottagandelag)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code> — C's vote behaviour is the key swing variable</li>
 <li>Links to <code>voter-segmentation.md</code> §C section</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-10"></a></h3>
 <p>Whether C's amendment demands will be adopted by SfU committee is uncertain. If adopted (unlikely given government majority), this becomes a signal of coalition complexity. [B3]</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024096">HD024096<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024096<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Miljöpartiet (MP) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Jacob Risberg<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion demanding an arms export ban to dictatorships and opposing new secrecy provisions in the arms export control framework. This motion is separate from the budget and migration clusters.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-11">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-11">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-11"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 4/10. Arms export policy is important but less electorally salient than budget and migration in the current cycle.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title">Key Claims (from metadata and title)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title">Key Claims (from metadata and title)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-from-metadata-and-title"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>MP demands a ban on arms exports to authoritarian states.</li>
 <li>MP opposes new secrecy provisions that would reduce parliamentary oversight of arms exports.</li>
 <li>This motion continues MP's longstanding foreign policy profile on arms control.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-5">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-5">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to <code>comparative-international.md</code> — Sweden's arms export policy is under European scrutiny</li>
 <li>Links to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> IND-09 (arms export policy development)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-11"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched — analysis based on title and metadata only. [C3]. The specific secrecy provisions being opposed are not detailed in available data. This is a significant evidence gap.</p>
 <p><strong>Note</strong>: This document should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 if full text is fetched.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024097">HD024097<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024097"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024097
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [C3] — metadata-only; full text not fetched in this run</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h3>
 <p>This document is catalogued in the data-download-manifest but full text was not retrieved in this analysis run. Analysis is based on title, party attribution, and document metadata only.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-12">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-12">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-12"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 3–5/10. Lower-priority motion in the 2025/26 riksmöte batch relative to the four flagship motions (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024098).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-11">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-11">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-11"></a></h3>
 <p>Available only from title/metadata — specific claims require full text retrieval.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-12"></a></h3>
 <p>Full text not fetched. This file should be upgraded to [B1] in Run 2 by fetching full text via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: Retrieve full text and update this analysis file.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024098">HD024098<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024098"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024098<br>
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-23<br>
 <strong>Party</strong>: Miljöpartiet (MP) | <strong>Talman</strong>: Janine Alm Ericson<br>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Motion (följdmotion to prop. 2025/26:236)<br>
 <strong>Admiralty</strong>: [B1] — confirmed primary source</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion opposing the fuel tax cut, citing five expert agencies: Konjunkturinstitutet, Naturvårdsverket, 2030-sekretariatet, Statens energimyndighet, and Trafikverket. MP argues the measure undermines climate targets and contradicts expert advice.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-13">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-13">Political Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-13"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>DIW</strong>: 7/10. Five-agency citation gives this motion unusually strong expert legitimacy. MP is positioning as the "expert-aligned" voice.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-claims-12">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-claims-12">Key Claims<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-claims-12"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Five named government agencies opposed the measure in remiss.</li>
 <li>The fuel tax cut contradicts Sweden's climate commitments and 2030 targets.</li>
 <li>MP endorses the V position (reject cut) and adds a climate reinvestment requirement.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-6">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-6">Cross-Reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Links to HD024092 (V: same rejection; MP endorses V's distributional argument and adds climate dimension)</li>
 <li>Links to <code>methodology-reflection.md</code> — agency documents not independently fetched</li>
 <li>Links to <code>comparative-international.md</code> — Norway and Germany have similar expert-vs-government tensions on energy taxation</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13">Outstanding Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outstanding-uncertainty-13"></a></h3>
 <p>The five agency remiss documents are not independently fetched — cited as reported in MP's motion. [B2]. MP's threshold risk (currently near 4%) means this motion may be the party's last major pre-election policy statement.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026">Seat-Projection Deltas (as of April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026">Seat-Projection Deltas (as of April 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026"></a></h3>
 <p>Based on recent opinion polling patterns (no specific poll cited — structural assessment):</p>
 
 
@@ -1779,13 +1779,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-as-of-april-2026">Seat-Projection Deltas (as o
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Est. current support</th><th>Trend</th><th>2026 seat projection delta</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>~30%</td><td>Stable</td><td>+0–5</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>~19%</td><td>Stable</td><td>-0–3</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>~18%</td><td>Declining</td><td>-2–5</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>~9%</td><td>Slightly rising</td><td>+0–3</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>~6%</td><td>Stable</td><td>+0–2</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>~5%</td><td>Borderline</td><td>±0 (threshold risk)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>~4%</td><td>At threshold</td><td>±0 (threshold risk)</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>~4%</td><td>Stable</td><td>±0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Assessment confidence: LOW [C3] — no specific poll data. Structural analysis based on motion evidence only.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-2026">Coalition Viability Post-2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-2026"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic">Current (Tidö) coalition logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-2026">Coalition Viability Post-2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic">Current (Tidö) coalition logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-coalition-logic"></a></h4>
 <p>The motions confirm the current alignment: M + SD + KD + L govern; C is a partial ally. Opposition (S + V + MP) is fragmented. For a 2026 government change:</p>
 <p><strong>Left-bloc requirement</strong>: S + V + MP would need ~175 seats. Current structural position suggests ~165–170 seats probable — requires either MP clearing 4% threshold AND strong S performance.</p>
 <p><strong>Centre-left alternative</strong>: S + C — possible only if C abandons current alliance. C's partial government support on migration (HD024089, HD024095) suggests C is not ready for this move.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning">This Week's Motion Impact on 2026 Electoral Positioning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning">This Week's Motion Impact on 2026 Electoral Positioning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motion-impact-on-2026-electoral-positioning">This Week's M
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Motion impact on 2026 positioning</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>HD024082 reinforces fiscal competence narrative — good for centrist swing voters</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>HD024092's distributional framing is strong for V base but doesn't expand their electorate</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>HD024098's agency-citation approach shores up green credentials but party at threshold risk</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>HD024089's moderate positioning is electorally rational — keeps both coalition options open</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>No motions; expected to support government — reinforces stable coalition partner image</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot">Mermaid: Coalition Mathematics Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot">Mermaid: Coalition Mathematics Snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 pie title Current Parliament Approximate Seat Distribution
     "S (103)" : 103
@@ -1830,9 +1830,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-coalition-mathematics-snapshot">Mermaid: Coalition Mathematic
     "KD (19)" : 19</pre>
 <p><em>Seat counts based on 2022 election results — 349 total seats. Government coalition (M+SD+KD+L) = 176; Opposition (S+V+MP) = 145; C = 24 pivotal. Sources: riksdagen.se official data [A1]</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense">2022 Election Seat Allocation (official, riksdagen.se)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense">2022 Election Seat Allocation (official, riksdagen.se)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2022-election-seat-allocation-official-riksdagense">2022 Election Sea
 <strong>Pivotal C</strong>: 24 seats</p>
 <p><em>Source: riksdagen.se official election results [A1]</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes">This Week's Motions: Predicted Vote Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes">This Week's Motions: Predicted Vote Outcomes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-this-weeks-motions-predicted-vote-outcomes">This Week's Motions: Pred
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Proposition</th><th>Ja (expect)</th><th>Nej (expect)</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>prop. 2025/26:236 (fuel tax)</td><td>M+SD+KD+L = 176</td><td>S+V+MP = 149</td><td>C ~0–24</td><td>PASSES (government majority)</td></tr><tr><td>prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation)</td><td>M+SD+KD+L = 176</td><td>V+MP = 42</td><td>S+C = 131</td><td>PASSES (government majority)</td></tr><tr><td>prop. 2025/26:Mottagandelag</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+C = 200</td><td>V+MP = 42</td><td>S = 107</td><td>PASSES strongly</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096 arms export ban</td><td>V+MP+S = 149 (partial)</td><td>M+SD = 141</td><td>KD+L+C</td><td>FAILS</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Assessment: All government propositions pass with current coalition. Opposition motions all fail. C's partial abstention on migration does not change outcomes.</em></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis">Governing Majority Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis">Governing Majority Sensitivity Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1977,33 +1977,33 @@ <h2 id="rm-governing-majority-sensitivity-analysis">Governing Majority Sensitivi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Government seats</th><th>Margin</th><th>Stable?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Current (all four parties full support)</td><td>176</td><td>+3</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>L drops out or abstains</td><td>160</td><td>-13</td><td>Minority, needs C</td></tr><tr><td>SD rebels on one vote</td><td>103</td><td>-70</td><td>Needs full C+L</td></tr><tr><td>Full Tidö coalition + C</td><td>200</td><td>+51</td><td>Highly stable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Threshold</strong>: 175 seats needed for absolute majority. With 176, the government has a margin of 1. A single resignation or long-term illness in M/SD/KD/L bloc can produce a 174-175 tie requiring Speaker casting vote.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236">Mermaid: Vote Prediction for prop. 2025/26:236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236">Mermaid: Vote Prediction for prop. 2025/26:236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-vote-prediction-for-prop-202526236"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27", "pie1": "#00d9ff", "pie2": "#ff006e", "pie3": "#ffbe0b"}}}%%
 pie title Predicted Vote: prop 2025/26:236 (Fuel Tax)
     "Ja — Government coalition (176)" : 176
     "Nej — S+V+MP (149)" : 149
     "Abstain/Absent (~24)" : 24</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions">Target Voter Segments by Party (this week's motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082">S — Socialdemokraterna (HD024082)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions">Target Voter Segments by Party (this week's motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-target-voter-segments-by-party-this-weeks-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082">S — Socialdemokraterna (HD024082)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--socialdemokraterna-hd024082"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Cooperative housing residents (<em>bostadsrättsinnehavare</em>) — approximately 800,000 households who were excluded from the electricity support scheme by a design flaw in prop. 2025/26:236. These are primarily urban and suburban middle-income households, core S electoral territory that drifted toward M/SD in 2022.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: The 800,000 cooperative households overlap with voters who might support the fuel tax cut for other reasons. S must offer a compelling alternative that fixes the design flaw without appearing to oppose energy relief broadly.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092">V — Vänsterpartiet (HD024092)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092">V — Vänsterpartiet (HD024092)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v--vänsterpartiet-hd024092"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Low-income workers and renters in car-dependent areas who spend a disproportionate share of income on fuel. V's motion cites RUT analysis (dnr 2026:158) showing that the fuel tax cut skews 5:1 toward higher-income households — the inverse of V's target segment.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: V's base is partly urban non-car-dependent (where the fuel cut is less salient) and partly peripheral workers (where any energy relief is welcome regardless of distributional analysis). The RUT argument plays well in V's intellectual base but may not resonate with peripheral V voters.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098">MP — Miljöpartiet (HD024098)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098">MP — Miljöpartiet (HD024098)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp--miljöpartiet-hd024098"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Climate-concerned voters, primarily urban, highly educated, who frame energy pricing as a climate tool. MP's motion's five-agency citation strategy appeals to voters who trust scientific and bureaucratic expertise.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: MP is at the 4% threshold. The party needs to maximize turnout among its core voters rather than expand. The agency-citation approach is credible with the base but does not add new segments.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095">C — Centerpartiet (HD024089, HD024095)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095">C — Centerpartiet (HD024089, HD024095)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c--centerpartiet-hd024089-hd024095"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Primary target</strong>: Rural and small-town voters with pragmatic liberal instincts. C's moderate positioning on migration (accepting the framework, opposing extreme elements) and absence of opposition on energy reflect a rural electorate that is culturally conservative but economically pragmatic.</p>
 <p><strong>Voter tension</strong>: C must distinguish itself from both M and S. The current motion pattern shows C differentiating on rule-of-law grounds (opposing deportation without procedural safeguards) while accepting the economic framework. This is a coherent "liberal conservative" position.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-map">Segment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-map">Segment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Voter Segment: Economic Concern vs. Cultural Conservatism
@@ -2021,16 +2021,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-map">Segment Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
     M target: [0.35, 0.75]</pre>
 <p><em>Assessment confidence: MEDIUM [C3]. Quadrant placement is structural inference from motion content, not polling data.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-set">Comparator Set<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-set"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: Norway (Nordic welfare state comparator), Germany (EU arms export + energy policy)</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary</strong>: Denmark (migration/reception policy), Netherlands (deportation reform)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy">Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy">Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-1-energyfuel-tax-policy">Issue 1: Energy/Fuel Tax Policy<a clas
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (2026)</th><th>Norway</th><th>Germany</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fuel tax policy</td><td>Temporary reduction to EU minimum (prop. 2025/26:236)</td><td>No fuel tax cut; used petroleum fund for household support</td><td>Extended carbon pricing; rebates targeted to low-income</td><td>Sweden outlier in using fuel tax as relief mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Climate instrument</td><td>Carbon tax at risk of dilution</td><td>Carbon pricing maintained</td><td>Emissions trading as primary lever</td><td>Sweden historically strong carbon price — this cut signals policy drift</td></tr><tr><td>Distributional approach</td><td>Electricity support (3.4bn SEK); but cooperative housing excluded</td><td>Targeted household transfers</td><td>Low-income specific rebates</td><td>Norwegian and German models more targeted</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In analysis</strong>: Sweden's approach is anomalous among Nordic states. Norway maintained its carbon price framework during the energy crisis 2022–23 and used general fiscal transfers instead of sectoral tax cuts. Germany's 2022 "Tankrabatt" (fuel tax reduction) was widely criticised as poorly targeted — and is now cited in Swedish debates by opposition parties. The government's choice to replicate the German Tankrabatt model, despite its documented failure, is strategically vulnerable to exactly the critique MP (HD024098) and V (HD024092) are mounting.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals">Issue 2: Deportation of Foreign Nationals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals">Issue 2: Deportation of Foreign Nationals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-2-deportation-of-foreign-nationals">Issue 2: Deportation of For
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden (prop. 2025/26:235)</th><th>Denmark</th><th>Netherlands</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Threshold</td><td>Lowered to any sentence stricter than a fine</td><td>Lower threshold already in place; regular reviews</td><td>Tightened in 2023; Lagrådet equivalent raised concerns</td></tr><tr><td>Childhood arrival protection</td><td>Removed for under-15 arrivals</td><td>Never had strong equivalent protection</td><td>Retained with ECHR constraints</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet/constitutional review</td><td>Explicit rejection [A1]</td><td>No equivalent body</td><td>Constitutional court review ongoing</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR compliance</td><td>Contested</td><td>Challenged in ECtHR cases</td><td>Several adverse ECtHR judgements on expulsion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Outside-In</strong>: Denmark's more aggressive deportation regime has faced multiple ECtHR rulings. The Netherlands' 2023 tightening was struck down in part by constitutional courts. Sweden, by removing childhood-arrival protections, risks ECHR Art. 8 (family life) claims — a risk explicitly noted by V in HD024090. The comparator experience suggests Scenario 3 (constitutional challenge) is underpriced at 13%.</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation">Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation">Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-issue-3-arms-export-regulation">Issue 3: Arms Export Regulation<a cla
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: [Norway — arms export], [Germany — arms export], [Netherlands — arms export]</p>
 <p><strong>Outside-In</strong>: MP's (HD024096) demand that third-country diversion risk always be considered at the licensing stage aligns with German practice. The Netherlands requires parliamentary notification for major sales. Sweden's proposed framework is less stringent on both counts. From an international norm perspective, MP's position is closer to EU partner practice.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison">Mermaid: Policy Position Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison">Mermaid: Policy Position Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Policy Restrictiveness vs International Norm (Higher = More Restrictive)"
@@ -2150,25 +2150,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-position-comparison">Mermaid: Policy Position Comparis
 <p><em>Sweden government position scored against Nordic/EU comparators. Score 1 = least restrictive, 5 = most restrictive.</em><br>
 <em>Sources: riksdagen.se (primary documents) + ECHR case law (general knowledge baseline). Admiralty [B2].</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics">Parallel 1: 2002–2006 — Opposition Fragmentation Before Bloc Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics">Parallel 1: 2002–2006 — Opposition Fragmentation Before Bloc Politics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1-20022006--opposition-fragmentation-before-bloc-politics"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Before the "Alliansen" coalition was formalized in 2004–2006, the centre-right parties (M, C, L, KD) often filed competing motions on the same government propositions, offering incompatible alternatives. This fragmentation allowed the Social Democratic government to portray the opposition as ungovernable.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity to 2026</strong>: S, V, and MP are replicating this pattern — all opposing the same proposition (2025/26:236) but with incompatible alternatives. The government can credibly ask: "What would the opposition actually do?"</p>
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: Alliansen required a dominant party (M under Reinfeldt) to discipline the others around a common platform. No equivalent disciplinarian exists in the current S-led opposition. S leads but cannot compel V and MP to align.</p>
 <p><strong>Outcome probability</strong>: Based on this parallel, the government's electoral position is likely to benefit from opposition fragmentation unless a formal pre-election coordination agreement is signed before summer 2026. [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority">Parallel 2: 2014 "Decemberöverenskommelsen" — Managing a Thin Majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority">Parallel 2: 2014 "Decemberöverenskommelsen" — Managing a Thin Majority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2-2014-decemberöverenskommelsen--managing-a-thin-majority"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: In December 2014, after the 2014 election produced no clear majority, the Decemberöverenskommelse (the "December agreement") between the red-green government and the Alliance created a norm that a minority government should be allowed to govern via its own budget.</p>
 <p><strong>Structural similarity</strong>: The current Tidö coalition's 176-seat majority (margin: 1) is structurally similar to the weak governments of 2010–2018. A single defection, illness, or MP threshold breach could recreate a hung-parliament dynamic.</p>
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: The Tidö coalition has an explicit four-party agreement, unlike the minority governments of 2014–2018. This makes it more resilient but also means SD has greater policy leverage than in a confidence-and-supply arrangement.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern">Parallel 3: Lagrådet Rejections — Historical Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern">Parallel 3: Lagrådet Rejections — Historical Pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3-lagrådet-rejections--historical-pattern"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Lagrådet's rejection of prop. 2025/26:235 (deportation law) continues a pattern of Lagrådet expressing serious concern about migration-related legislation. Similar concerns were raised about prop. 2021/22:131 (on residence permits) and prop. 2015/16:174 (temporary asylum restrictions).</p>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: In all three prior cases, the Riksdag passed the legislation despite Lagrådet concerns. In two cases (2015 and 2021), subsequent ECHR or Swedish court rulings required legislative amendments within 3–7 years.</p>
 <p><strong>Implication for 2026</strong>: The deportation law is likely to pass but faces elevated legal risk. The 3–7 year reform cycle means the political consequences will fall on whatever government is in power in 2028–2031.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-historical-timeline">Mermaid: Historical Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-historical-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-historical-timeline">Mermaid: Historical Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-historical-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark"}}%%
 timeline
     title Swedish Legislative-Judicial Cycle on Migration
@@ -2179,9 +2179,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-historical-timeline">Mermaid: Historical Timeline<a class=""
     2026 : Prop 2025/26:235 (New deportation law) — Lagrådet explicitly rejects
     2030 : Projected: ECtHR ruling or Swedish Supreme Administrative Court review</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:236 (Supplementary Budget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:236 (Supplementary Budget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526236-supplementary-budget">Feasibili
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative passage</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Government has 176-seat majority; S/V/MP amendments will fail</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative implementation</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Tax Agency (<em>Skatteverket</em>) has standard fuel tax adjustment mechanism</td></tr><tr><td>Cooperative housing exclusion fix</td><td>LOW — short term</td><td>S's HD024082 would require a separate fast-track proposition; FiU would need to schedule before May 1 implementation date</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR compatibility</td><td>HIGH</td><td>No fundamental rights concerns with energy tax cuts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Key implementation risk</strong>: The 800,000 cooperative housing household exclusion (HD024082) is a genuine technical problem. If Skatteverket confirms the exclusion at implementation, it becomes a politically embarrassing live issue during the pre-election summer.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:235 (Deportation Law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law">Feasibility Assessment: prop. 2025/26:235 (Deportation Law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-prop-202526235-deportation-law">Feasibility As
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative passage</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Government majority; Lagrådet rejection is advisory only</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative implementation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Migrationsverket will need new procedures and expanded capacity</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenge</td><td>HIGH probability of ECHR challenge</td><td>HD024090 cites Lagrådet; historical pattern shows ~3–7 year legal trajectory</td></tr><tr><td>Deterrence effect</td><td>LOW confidence</td><td>Limited empirical evidence that deportation threat reduces irregular arrivals [C3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law">Feasibility Assessment: Mottagandelagen (new reception law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law">Feasibility Assessment: Mottagandelagen (new reception law)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2276,7 +2276,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-assessment-mottagandelagen-new-reception-law">Feasibility
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Assessment</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislative passage</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>C broadly accepts; HD024089 shows C's amendments are limited</td></tr><tr><td>Municipal implementation</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Area restriction provisions (opposed by C in HD024089) will create friction with municipalities</td></tr><tr><td>Emergency welfare rights</td><td>LOW priority for government</td><td>C's demand for municipal emergency welfare rights (HD024089) is unlikely to be accepted; C has shown it will vote for the law regardless</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility">Opposition's Counterfactual Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility">Opposition's Counterfactual Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility"></a></h3>
 <p>If the opposition's alternative budget were implemented:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S's design fix (HD024082)</strong>: Technically straightforward — would require extending support mechanism to cooperative housing associations. Net cost: estimated 500 MSEK–1.5 GSEK (not costed in motion — gap noted [C3]).</li>
@@ -2285,10 +2285,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-oppositions-counterfactual-feasibility">Opposition's Counterfactual F
 </ul>
 <p><em>Cost assessment confidence: LOW [C3] — no official costing document available for opposition alternatives.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental">Hypothesis H1: Opposition Fragmentation is Strategic, Not Accidental<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses">ACH Matrix — Competing Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix--competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental">Hypothesis H1: Opposition Fragmentation is Strategic, Not Accidental<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: S, V, and MP filed separate budget motions (HD024082, HD024092, HD024098) deliberately to address different voter segments — S targets cooperative housing residents, V targets low-income workers, MP targets climate voters. This is coordinated differentiation, not genuine disagreement.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence For</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-opposition-fragmentation-is-strategic-not-accidental">H
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH verdict</strong>: H1 partially confirmed. There is likely some tactical coordination at the level of "don't overlap," but the substantive disagreement on the fuel tax cut is genuine. The fragmentation is real and strategically harmful. [C2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic">Hypothesis H2: Government's Fuel Tax Cut is Primarily Electoral, Not Economic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic">Hypothesis H2: Government's Fuel Tax Cut is Primarily Electoral, Not Economic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-economic"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The fuel tax cut (prop. 2025/26:236) has no credible economic rationale (Konjunkturinstitutet says it won't solve household budget pressure effectively) and is primarily designed to generate a pre-election "relief" narrative, with SD and suburban car-dependent voters as the target.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence For</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-governments-fuel-tax-cut-is-primarily-electoral-not-eco
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH verdict</strong>: H2 partially confirmed. The measure likely has both genuine relief intent AND electoral timing. The opposition's framing challenge is that they cannot convincingly deny the relief rationale without appearing to oppose household cost relief. [B2]</p>
 <hr>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect">Hypothesis H3: Lagrådet Rejection of Deportation Law Will Have No Lasting Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect">Hypothesis H3: Lagrådet Rejection of Deportation Law Will Have No Lasting Effect<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-lasting-effect"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: Despite Lagrådet's explicit rejection of prop. 2025/26:235, the law will pass, be implemented, and face no successful constitutional challenge — Lagrådet opinions are advisory, not binding, and courts rarely strike down parliamentary legislation.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence For</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2337,18 +2337,18 @@ <h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-lagrådet-rejection-of-deportation-law-will-have-no-las
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH verdict</strong>: H3 partially confirmed for short-term (2026–27). However, the ECHR dimension means a 5–7 year legal trajectory is possible that could ultimately embarrass the government. The medium-term political risk is underestimated. [C3]</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team Challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Weakest point in the opposition's overall strategy</strong>: The opposition's biggest vulnerability is that the government can credibly claim to be "doing something" about energy prices and migration — two of the top 2–3 voter concerns. The opposition offers better design and rule-of-law arguments, but these are process arguments, not outcome arguments. Voters who pay high energy bills do not primarily care about distributional efficiency — they care about relief. The opposition is winning the technocratic argument while losing the emotional one.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternatives">Rejected Alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Hypothesis R1: SD will vote against the fuel tax cut</strong> — Rejected. SD's electoral base in car-dependent peripheral Sweden makes opposing a fuel tax cut politically impossible. [B1]</li>
 <li><strong>Hypothesis R2: S and V will file a joint motion</strong> — Rejected. The documentary record shows three separate motions with no joint sponsor. The distributional framing (V's RUT citation) and design-quality framing (S) are politically incompatible. [B1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2420,17 +2420,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-Dimension Classification<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>HD024082 (S)</th><th>HD024092 (V)</th><th>HD024090 (V)</th><th>HD024096 (MP)</th><th>HD024089 (C)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Policy domain</strong></td><td>Fiscal/Energy</td><td>Fiscal/Energy/Climate</td><td>Criminal justice/Migration</td><td>Foreign policy/Security</td><td>Migration/Social</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Legislative stage</strong></td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>Committee (FiU)</td><td>Committee (SfU)</td><td>Committee (UU)</td><td>Committee (SfU)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Ideological axis</strong></td><td>Centre-left</td><td>Left</td><td>Left</td><td>Green-left</td><td>Centre</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU/International dimension</strong></td><td>Moderate (energy directive)</td><td>Moderate (climate treaty)</td><td>High (ECHR, deportation)</td><td>High (EU arms export regime)</td><td>Moderate (EU reception directives)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Electoral salience</strong></td><td>High (household energy)</td><td>Medium-high (redistribution)</td><td>Medium (rule of law)</td><td>Medium-low (niche)</td><td>Medium (municipal autonomy)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data sensitivity</strong></td><td>Low (public budget data)</td><td>Low (RUT public analysis)</td><td>Low (public legal opinion)</td><td>Low-medium (export controls)</td><td>Low (public legislation)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Priority tier</strong></td><td>P1 — Critical</td><td>P1 — Critical</td><td>P1 — Critical</td><td>P2 — High</td><td>P2 — High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-document-access-classification">Document Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-access-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-access-classification">Document Access Classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-access-classification"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents are publicly available under Offentlighetsprincipen (Swedish freedom of information law). No special handling required. GDPR Art. 9 special categories (political opinion) apply but are publicly made per Art. 9(2)(e).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-retention-guidelines">Retention Guidelines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-guidelines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention-guidelines">Retention Guidelines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention-guidelines"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Analysis files: Retain for 24 months (electoral cycle documentation)</li>
 <li>Raw MCP data: 12 months</li>
 <li>Per-document analyses: Permanent public record</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution">Mermaid: Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution">Mermaid: Policy Domain Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 pie title Policy Domain Distribution — 2026-04-23 Motions
     "Fiscal/Energy" : 3
@@ -2440,10 +2440,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-policy-domain-distribution">Mermaid: Policy Domain Distributi
     "Other" : 1</pre>
 <p><em>Based on 14 analysed motions. Sources: riksdagen.se official document metadata [A1]</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu">Cluster 1: Extra Ändringsbudget för 2026 (FiU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu">Cluster 1: Extra Ändringsbudget för 2026 (FiU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary proposition</strong>: prop. 2025/26:236</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024082 (S), HD024092 (V), HD024098 (MP)</li>
@@ -2451,7 +2451,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-1-extra-ändringsbudget-för-2026-fiu">Cluster 1: Extra Ändr
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: risk-assessment.md §R-02, swot-analysis.md §Strengths, election-2026-analysis.md §Budget dimension</li>
 <li><strong>External cross-references</strong>: RUT analysis dnr 2026:158 (cited in HD024092); 5 agency remiss responses (cited in HD024098)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu">Cluster 2: Utvisning på grund av brott (SfU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu">Cluster 2: Utvisning på grund av brott (SfU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary proposition</strong>: prop. 2025/26:235 / SOU 2025:54</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024090 (V), HD024095 (C), HD024097 (MP)</li>
@@ -2459,7 +2459,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-2-utvisning-på-grund-av-brott-sfu">Cluster 2: Utvisning på
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: threat-analysis.md §T-3, stakeholder-perspectives.md §Civil Society, historical-parallels.md</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference</strong>: HD024090 cites prop. 2021/22:224 (2022 reform) as context for why another reform is premature</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu">Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu">Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary proposition</strong>: prop. 2025/26:228</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024096 (MP), HD024091 (V)</li>
@@ -2467,7 +2467,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-3-krigsmateriel-uu">Cluster 3: Krigsmateriel (UU)<a class=""
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: comparative-international.md (EU arms export regime comparison), threat-analysis.md §T-3</li>
 <li><strong>Cross-reference</strong>: HD024096 cites Lagrådet criticism of secrecy provisions</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au">Cluster 4: Mottagandelag + Bosättning (SfU / AU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au">Cluster 4: Mottagandelag + Bosättning (SfU / AU)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary propositions</strong>: prop. 2025/26:229 (Mottagandelag), prop. 2025/26:215 (Bosättning)</li>
 <li><strong>Motions</strong>: HD024089, HD024087, HD024080 (Mottagandelag); HD024079, HD024077, HD024086 (Bosättning)</li>
@@ -2475,14 +2475,14 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-4-mottagandelag--bosättning-sfu--au">Cluster 4: Mottagandela
 <li><strong>Linked files</strong>: voter-segmentation.md, coalition-mathematics.md §C-swing</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated Activity Patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>No joint motions</strong>: Despite opposing the same propositions, S/V/MP filed separate motions against prop. 2025/26:236 — a coordination failure.</li>
 <li><strong>C as partial government ally</strong>: C supported the migration reform framework (HD024089) while opposing specific provisions — diverges from typical opposition coalition.</li>
 <li><strong>Lagrådet as opposition amplifier</strong>: Both V (HD024090) and MP (HD024096) explicitly cite Lagrådet rejections, suggesting a deliberate strategy of delegitimising government proposals through constitutional bodies.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network">Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network">Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {"theme": "dark", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#0a0e27"}}}%%
 graph LR
     P236["Prop 2025/26:236\nBudget supplementary"]:::prop --> M82["HD024082 S"]:::party_s
@@ -2506,51 +2506,51 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-cross-reference-network">Mermaid: Cross-Reference Network<a c
     classDef party_c fill:#457b9d,color:#fff
     classDef authority fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm--icd-203-audit">§ ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-1-objectivity">Standard 1: Objectivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1-objectivity"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-1-objectivity">Standard 1: Objectivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1-objectivity"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Analysis covers S, V, MP, C motions with equal depth. No party's arguments are dismissed without evidence.</li>
 <li>Limitation: Government's counter-arguments are inferred from proposition text, not from direct government motion analysis. This is a structural limitation of the opposition-motions workflow.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-2-independence">Standard 2: Independence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2-independence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-2-independence">Standard 2: Independence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2-independence"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: No partisan communication influenced the analysis. Sources are all publicly available via riksdagen.se.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-3-timeliness">Standard 3: Timeliness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3-timeliness"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-3-timeliness">Standard 3: Timeliness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3-timeliness"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Motions dated 2026-04-13–17; analysis produced 2026-04-23. Lag: 6–10 days. Acceptable for strategic analysis; not suitable for breaking news.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance">Standard 4: Sourcing and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance">Standard 4: Sourcing and Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4-sourcing-and-provenance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Strength</strong>: Core claims all cite dok_ids (HD024082, HD024090, HD024092, HD024095, HD024096, HD024098, HD024089). External sources (RUT dnr 2026:158, five agencies) are cited as reported in the motions rather than independently verified.</li>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: RUT dnr 2026:158 and specific agency remiss documents were not independently fetched. Confidence in those specific figures is therefore [B2] rather than [A1].</li>
 <li><strong>Action required (Run 2)</strong>: If agency remiss documents are fetched directly, confidence in distributional claims could be upgraded to [A1–A2].</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-5-uncertainty">Standard 5: Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5-uncertainty"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-5-uncertainty">Standard 5: Uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5-uncertainty"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Confidence levels applied throughout. WEP language (Likely, Very likely, etc.) used consistently. Coalition scenarios assigned probability bands.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-6-consistency">Standard 6: Consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6-consistency"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-6-consistency">Standard 6: Consistency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6-consistency"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: The lead narrative (opposition fragmentation as key story) is consistent across executive-brief, synthesis-summary, intelligence-assessment, and scenario-analysis.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-7-completeness">Standard 7: Completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7-completeness"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-7-completeness">Standard 7: Completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7-completeness"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: Arms export motion (HD024096) received less analytical depth than budget and migration motions. Jacob Risberg's full text was not fetched. The secrecy provisions element is underanalysed.</li>
 <li><strong>Mitigation</strong>: Arms export was identified as significance rank 4 of 4 clusters — lower priority is analytically justified.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-8-accuracy">Standard 8: Accuracy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8-accuracy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-8-accuracy">Standard 8: Accuracy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8-accuracy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Maintained: Seat counts (349 total, exact per-party figures) sourced from official riksdagen.se election data [A1]. All dok_ids verified against manifest.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies">Standard 9: Appropriate Use of Analogies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies">Standard 9: Appropriate Use of Analogies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9-appropriate-use-of-analogies"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Historical parallels (2002–2006 opposition fragmentation, Decemberöverenskommelsen, Lagrådet rejection pattern) are structural analogies, not direct precedent. Limitations noted in <code>historical-parallels.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used">SAT Catalog — Structured Analytic Techniques Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used">SAT Catalog — Structured Analytic Techniques Used<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2615,8 +2615,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-catalog--structured-analytic-techniques-used">SAT Catalog — Str
 <p><strong>Total SAT techniques deployed</strong>: 10 ≥ required minimum of 10. ✅</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-motions</li>
 <li><strong>Run date</strong>: 2026-04-23T07:16:27Z</li>
@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>MCP status</strong>: riksdag-regering LIVE (generated_at: 2026-04-23T07:16:36Z)</li>
 <li><strong>Analysis subfolder</strong>: analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-downloaded-documents">Downloaded Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-downloaded-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-downloaded-documents">Downloaded Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-downloaded-documents"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2783,18 +2783,58 @@ <h2 id="rm-downloaded-documents">Downloaded Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Date</th><th>Committee</th><th>Submitter</th><th>Full-text</th><th>DIW tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>FiU</td><td>Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>FiU</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – Sänkt skatt på drivmedel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>FiU</td><td>Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning på grund av brott</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024089</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)</td><td>Full</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>HD024087</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024080</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>HD024079</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr><tr><td>HD024077</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>AU</td><td>Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr><tr><td>HD024086</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende för nyanlända</td><td>mot</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP)</td><td>Metadata</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters-identified">Policy Clusters Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters-identified"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters-identified">Policy Clusters Identified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters-identified"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fiscal / Energy cluster</strong>: HD024082, HD024092, HD024098 — Extra ändringsbudget, bränslesskatt, elstöd</li>
 <li><strong>Migration / Crime nexus cluster</strong>: HD024090, HD024095, HD024097 — Utvisning på grund av brott</li>
 <li><strong>Arms exports cluster</strong>: HD024096, HD024091 — Krigsmateriel regulation</li>
 <li><strong>Asylum reception cluster</strong>: HD024089, HD024087, HD024080, HD024079, HD024077, HD024086 — Mottagandelag, bosättning</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-notes">MCP Server Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>riksdag-regering: All requests successful, no retries required</li>
 <li>Total motions in 2025/26 riksmöte: 4,098 (as of 2026-04-23)</li>
 <li>Retrieval timestamp: 2026-04-23T07:18:00Z</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024077-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024077-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -2854,7 +2894,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:10.903Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:32.380Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html b/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html
index c92b72c8df..1e8259c25e 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.059Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.538Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.059Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.538Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö","description":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's three pre-election signature pillars — criminal-justice capacity (HD01CU25), migration enforcement with a research-mobility…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:11.059Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01au15.json","name":"documents/hd01au15.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu25.json","name":"documents/hd01cu25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu29.json","name":"documents/hd01cu29.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu23.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01sfu23.json","name":"documents/hd01sfu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö","description":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's three pre-election signature pillars — criminal-justice capacity (HD01CU25), migration enforcement with a research-mobility…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:32.538Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01au15.json","name":"documents/hd01au15.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu25.json","name":"documents/hd01cu25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu29.json","name":"documents/hd01cu29.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu23.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01sfu23.json","name":"documents/hd01sfu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's three pre-election signature pillars — <strong>criminal-justice capacity</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>), <strong>migration enforcement with a research-mobility carve-out</strong> (<code>HD01SfU23</code>), and <strong>monetary-institutional stewardship</strong> (<code>HD01FiU23</code>) — supplemented by two broad-consensus dossiers on <strong>ILO labour-rights ratification</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code>) and <strong>EV home-charging</strong> (<code>HD01CU29</code>). The cluster is a deliberate signalling composition ~5 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election: it lets M/KD/SD claim delivery on law-and-order and migration while L and centrist actors anchor EU-compatible labour and climate wins. Real implementation risk concentrates in <code>HD01CU25</code> (Kriminalvården capacity absorption) and <code>HD01SfU23</code> (Migrationsverket case-handling bifurcation); reputational risk concentrates in <code>HD01FiU23</code> (Riksbank balance-sheet losses and independence narratives).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Election-cycle messaging</strong> — Government communicators should sequence CU25 (law-and-order) + SfU23 (migration) floor speeches together during May 2026 to maximise pre-recess coverage; opposition should counter-frame SfU23 on researcher-mobility carve-out to split M from L and avoid S being boxed in as anti-research.</li>
 <li><strong>Implementation oversight</strong> — KU and Riksrevisionen should pre-flag CU25 (procurement/environmental shortcut exposure) and SfU23 (Migrationsverket dual-track IT and staffing) for 2026/27 audit scope; FiU23 confirms standing Riksbank independence review cadence.</li>
 <li><strong>International positioning</strong> — Ratification of ILO C190 (AU15) should be paired in government talking points with EU Platform Work Directive transposition and Nordic counterparts' earlier ratifications (Denmark, Finland, Norway) to maximise reputational dividend.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lead story</strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code> — the prison-capacity expansion bill is the highest-weighted item (DIW 85) because it combines large fiscal exposure (Kriminalvården expansion programme), compressed timelines, and pre-election symbolism. See <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>risk-assessment.md §Institutional</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Second line</strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code> (DIW 80) bifurcates migration policy — tightening on study permits while opening for researchers — creating both coalition-internal tension (SD–L) and an Opposition opening on competitiveness framing. See <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code> and <code>devils-advocate.md H3</code>.</li>
@@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Consensus items</strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO, DIW 72) and <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV charging, DIW 58) are broad-support dossiers that provide bipartisan cover for the government to claim delivery width.</li>
 <li><strong>Top forward trigger</strong>: watch the <strong>Kriminalvården 2026 Q2 capacity status report</strong> (expected +60 days, ~2026-06-23). A deviation ≥ 10 % from planned bed count would falsify the CU25 timeline and invert the government's crime-delivery narrative into the election. See <code>forward-indicators.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence--assumptions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--assumptions"></a></h3>
 <p>Key Judgments carry <strong>HIGH</strong> confidence on cluster composition and DIW ranking (based on primary <code>get_dokument</code> metadata, consistent with Riksdag committee calendar). <strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence on implementation deltas (dependent on 2026 Q2 status reports not yet published). <strong>LOW</strong> confidence on voter-level framing effects pending 2026 Q3 polling waves. See <code>intelligence-assessment.md §Key Assumptions Check</code> and <code>methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 audit</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--composition-diagram">📊 Composition diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--composition-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-composition-diagram">📊 Composition diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composition-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     A[CU25 Prison capacity&#x3C;br/>DIW 85] --> G[Tidö pre-election&#x3C;br/>signature cluster]
     B[SfU23 Migration/&#x3C;br/>Researchers DIW 80] --> G
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--composition-diagram">📊 Composition diagram<a class="" aria-hidden
     style J fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style K fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style L fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD01CU25"})</code> → <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD01SfU23"})</code> → <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a> [A1]</li>
@@ -269,10 +269,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <li>See <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> for full judgement-level source mapping.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story--decision">Lead story / decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story--decision"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story--decision">Lead story / decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story--decision"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant signal in today's five-report cluster is a <strong>cross-committee signalling composition</strong> rather than any single blockbuster bill. The Tidö coalition (M, KD, L, SD supply) has staged its two politically hottest pillars — <strong>prison-capacity expansion</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>) and <strong>migration tightening with a research carve-out</strong> (<code>HD01SfU23</code>) — alongside an <strong>institutional-stewardship</strong> report (<code>HD01FiU23</code>, Riksbank 2025) and two <strong>consensus dossiers</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code> ILO, <code>HD01CU29</code> EV charging) that provide breadth cover. This pattern — concentrating signature items in a single tabling window ~5 months before the <strong>September 2026 Riksdag election</strong> (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/sa-fungerar-riksdagen/riksdagens-uppgifter/val/">riksdagen.se election calendar</a> [A1]) — is strategically rational for the government but creates <strong>three concentrated implementation risks</strong> (CU25 procurement, SfU23 Migrationsverket IT, FiU23 balance-sheet narrative) that any of them materialising would damage delivery credibility simultaneously.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     R1["1. HD01CU25 — Prison capacity (DIW 85)&#x3C;br/>[riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25]"]
     R2["2. HD01SfU23 — Migration research (DIW 80)&#x3C;br/>[riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23]"]
@@ -286,50 +286,50 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style R4 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style R5 fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff</pre>
 <p>See <code>significance-scoring.md</code> for per-item DIW decomposition.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23">1. Pre-election signalling cluster (CU25 + SfU23 + FiU23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23">1. Pre-election signalling cluster (CU25 + SfU23 + FiU23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23"></a></h4>
 <p>The three high-DIW items (CU25, SfU23, FiU23 — <code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>) are <strong>not coincidentally tabled together</strong>. The Civilutskottet CU channel is being used unusually heavily for penal policy (CU25) alongside its standard housing/family-law remit, reflecting the government's decision to route capacity-expansion legislation through CU rather than JuU to accelerate planning-law carve-outs. SfU23 follows the 2024–25 migration tightening trajectory (see <code>historical-parallels.md §2024-SfU trajectory</code>) while opening a researcher carve-out that L and C can defend. FiU23 is the annual Riksbank review (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/utskott/finansutskottet</a> [A1]), unusually salient in 2026 because the Riksbank booked balance-sheet losses in 2023–24 that the recapitalisation statute addresses.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29">2. Consensus-breadth cluster (AU15 + CU29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29">2. Consensus-breadth cluster (AU15 + CU29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29"></a></h4>
 <p><code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO C190 on workplace violence/harassment + C155/C187 occupational safety) and <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV home-charging) serve as <strong>narrative-breadth</strong> items. AU15 signals EU-compatible, ILO-aligned labour rights (Denmark ratified C190 in 2022, Finland 2023, Norway 2023 — see <code>comparative-international.md</code>); CU29 signals climate-mobility delivery. Both are expected to attract broad-party support and give the government cover to claim width on workers' rights and climate alongside the harder CU25/SfU23 signals.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions">3. Coalition-internal tensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions">3. Coalition-internal tensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions"></a></h4>
 <p>SfU23 is the most likely intra-coalition friction point: SD will push maximalist framing on permit-abuse; L will defend researcher mobility; M/KD balance. CU25 will see S split — labour-union tradition vs. law-and-order triangulation — with V/MP opposing on environmental-carve-out grounds. FiU23 will see V/MP raise Riksbank mandate/ESG questions while M/L defend independence. See <code>devils-advocate.md §H2</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff">4. Post-election implementation cliff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff">4. Post-election implementation cliff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff"></a></h4>
 <p>All five items will clear chamber in 2026 before dissolution, but <strong>execution lands with whichever government forms after September 2026</strong>. CU25's Kriminalvården capacity timeline extends into 2027–2030 (see <code>forward-indicators.md</code>); SfU23's Migrationsverket IT build extends into 2027. A government transition ↔ delivery handover mismatch is the cluster's single largest cascading risk. See <code>risk-assessment.md §Institutional</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Suggested headline (EN)</strong>: "Riksdag Committee Reports Stack Tidö Pre-Election Pillars: Prisons, Migration, Riksbank"</li>
 <li><strong>Suggested headline (SV)</strong>: "Tidöpartierna staplar sina valsignaler: fängelser, migration och Riksbank i utskottsvågen"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description</strong>: "Five committee reports tabled 23 April cluster Tidö's law-and-order, migration and monetary-stewardship signals five months before the September 2026 election."</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> calls on HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29 [A1]</li>
 <li>riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/ [A1]</li>
 <li>regeringen.se — Tidöavtalet reference context [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling   <strong>Audience</strong>: analyst-desk, newsroom, KU oversight interests.
 <strong>Standards</strong>: ICD 203 (analytic standards); WEP / Kent confidence scale; Admiralty Code on all source citations.
 <strong>Base date</strong>: 2026-04-24.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Tidö has staged its pre-election committee-report cluster with three signature items (CU25 prison capacity, SfU23 migration/researchers, FiU23 Riksbank 2025) and two consensus items (AU15 ILO, CU29 EV charging). Delivery credibility over the next 60–120 days — dominated by the Kriminalvården Q2 capacity report and Migrationsverket dual-track IT milestone — will determine whether this cluster becomes a 2026 campaign asset (~40 % likelihood) or a narrative liability (~40 % combined S2 + S3 likelihood).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2">KJ-1 — The five-report cluster is strategically composed, not calendar-driven (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2">KJ-1 — The five-report cluster is strategically composed, not calendar-driven (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>HIGH</strong> confidence that the composition reflects coordinated signalling and coalition-internal horse-trading (H1 + H4 in <code>devils-advocate.md</code>). Evidence: simultaneous tabling across 4 committees with 3 signature items; coalition-internal balance visible in SfU23 carve-out structure; Tidö April 2026 delivery-ledger communications pattern. Analytic technique: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — 1 inconsistency against mainline H1, 0 against H4. Confidence rated HIGH because coordination is structurally visible; the residual 20 % accounts for partial contribution from calendar mechanics (H2). Primary source: <code>get_dokument</code> × 5 [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2">KJ-2 — CU25 (prison capacity) is the single highest-weight item and highest-risk delivery exposure (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2">KJ-2 — CU25 (prison capacity) is the single highest-weight item and highest-risk delivery exposure (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 85 (bounded 78–88) reflects convergence of electoral salience (95), fiscal/regulatory impact (90), and precedent value (80 — planning-law carve-outs). Implementation risk concentrates on Kriminalvården capacity absorption and procurement; probability of ≥ 10 % timeline slippage at 55 % posterior (Bayesian update from 2020/2023 capacity-plan miss base rate). Primary source: <code>HD01CU25</code> + <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-3 — SfU23 is the single most coalition-internally stressed item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-3 — SfU23 is the single most coalition-internally stressed item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 80 with coalition-stress sub-score 85 — the highest on the cluster table. Tension is between SD maximalist framing of abuse-prevention and L defence of researcher carve-out; M/KD balance. We assess <strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence that visible L position-paper defence will emerge pre-summer recess; L defection on floor vote is <strong>LOW</strong> (&#x3C; 20 %) because carve-out structure accommodates L preference. Primary source: <code>HD01SfU23</code> + L party published positions [B3].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2">KJ-4 — FiU23 (Riksbank 2025) is standing annual review but unusually salient given 2024–25 balance-sheet narrative (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2">KJ-4 — FiU23 (Riksbank 2025) is standing annual review but unusually salient given 2024–25 balance-sheet narrative (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2"></a></h4>
 <p>Probability (~ 45 %) that Riksbank recapitalisation becomes a 2026 chamber-floor debate rather than a contained standing-review item. Indicator: FiU scheduling a separate recapitalisation hearing. Primary source: <code>HD01FiU23</code> + <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> annual reports [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-5 — AU15 + CU29 function as breadth cover, producing low-probability but non-trivial reputational dividend potential (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-5 — AU15 + CU29 function as breadth cover, producing low-probability but non-trivial reputational dividend potential (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h4>
 <p>Scenario 5 ("broad-consensus windfall") sits at 8 %. Principal mechanism: pairing C190 ratification with EU Platform Work Directive transposition for Nordic / EU media. Primary source: <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> + ILO ratification dates [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-6 — The cluster's cascading-risk exposure is larger than any single item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-6 — The cluster's cascading-risk exposure is larger than any single item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h4>
 <p>Joint probability of ≥ 1 delivery failure (R1, R3, R5, R10 in <code>risk-assessment.md</code>) within Q3 2026 is ~ 70 %; joint probability of ≥ 2 is ~ 40 %. A combined CU25 timeline slip + SfU23 judicial/IT cascade + FiU23 recapitalisation debate is the low-probability (&#x3C; 10 %) but high-impact worst case. Primary source: Bayesian update on 2022–24 base rates [B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1">KJ-7 — Sweden's late ratification of ILO C190 is framing-rather-than-substance disadvantage (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1">KJ-7 — Sweden's late ratification of ILO C190 is framing-rather-than-substance disadvantage (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark (2022), Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands ratified before Sweden. Substantive reason: legal compatibility work in Diskrimineringslagen + Arbetsmiljölagen. <code>HD01AU15</code> completes Nordic parity with a measurable lag that opposition actors may frame as stewardship deficit. Primary source: <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org NORMLEX</a> [A1].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Assumption</th><th>Source</th><th>If wrong</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">A1</td><td>Sep 2026 election remains on schedule</td><td><a href="https://www.val.se/">valmyndigheten.se</a></td><td>Early election would compress implementation timelines</td><td>Re-run scenarios on altered horizon</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A2</td><td>Riksbank 2024–25 balance-sheet trajectory holds</td><td><a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a></td><td>Recovery would reduce FiU23 salience</td><td>Re-weight KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A3</td><td>No major Migrationsöverdomstolen ruling pre-tabling</td><td><a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a></td><td>Ruling would alter SfU23 context</td><td>Re-run KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A4</td><td>Kriminalvården 2026 capacity plan remains as published</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a></td><td>Revised plan invalidates CU25 baseline</td><td>Re-run KJ-2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A5</td><td>No EU directive change altering AU15 ratification landscape</td><td><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/">eur-lex.europa.eu</a></td><td>EU change would re-frame KJ-7</td><td>Re-run comparative analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong> (CU25): Kriminalvården Q2 2026 capacity status — target date ~ 2026-06-23; detection: report publication at <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong> (SfU23): any Migrationsöverdomstolen prövningstillstånd on SfU23 test case — rolling; detection: <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> press releases.</li>
@@ -388,20 +388,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Inte
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong> (CU25 politics): L party position-paper releases on CU25 / SfU23 — detection: <a href="https://www.liberalerna.se/">liberalerna.se</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong> (standing): any disinformation / narrative-amplification surge around CU25 slippage or SfU23 abuse framing — detection: <a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a> disinformation observatory.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH / VERY HIGH</strong>: KJ-1, KJ-2, KJ-4, KJ-7 (4 judgments)</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM</strong>: KJ-3, KJ-5, KJ-6 (3 judgments)</li>
 <li><strong>LOW</strong>: none</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Ratio HIGH:MEDIUM:LOW = 4:3:0. Absence of LOW judgments is consistent with a high-information base (5 attested <code>dok_id</code> + well-documented implementing agencies) and consistent with ICD 203 discipline on confidence-to-evidence mapping — see <code>methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 audit</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h3>
 <p>All key judgments cite at least one <code>get_dokument</code> call + one primary-source URL on data.riksdagen.se / regeringen.se / riksbank.se / ilo.org / kriminalvarden.se / migrationsverket.se / domstol.se.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: Decision-Impact Weighting (DIW) from <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §DIW</code>.
 <strong>Components</strong> (0–100 each, weighted): Stakeholder reach (20 %), Fiscal/regulatory impact (20 %), Institutional change (15 %), Electoral salience (15 %), Precedent value (10 %), Time-criticality (10 %), Coalition stress (10 %).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-table">Ranking table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-table">Ranking table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-table">Ranking table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th><code>dok_id</code></th><th align="center">Committee</th><th align="center">Stake</th><th align="center">Fiscal</th><th align="center">Inst</th><th align="center">Elect</th><th align="center">Prec</th><th align="center">Time</th><th align="center">Coal</th><th align="center"><strong>DIW</strong></th><th>Tier</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">95</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center"><strong>85</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">SfU</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center"><strong>80</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code></td><td align="center">FiU</td><td align="center">95</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center"><strong>78</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td align="center">AU</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center"><strong>72</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code></td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">50</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center"><strong>58</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a> [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-diagram">Ranking diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-diagram">Ranking diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Priority_L2plus["L2+ Priority HD01CU25 HD01SfU23 HD01FiU23"]
       A[HD01CU25 85&#x3C;br/>Prison capacity]
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-diagram">Ranking diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style C fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style D fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style E fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CU25 → 85</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>): bounded 78–88. If Kriminalvården publishes its Q2 2026 capacity report confirming on-track delivery (see <code>forward-indicators.md</code> +60d trigger), electoral salience stays at 95; if status slips, institutional weight rises and DIW trends to 88. Source: <code>HD01CU25</code> at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a> [A1].</li>
 <li><strong>SfU23 → 80</strong>: bounded 74–84. Coalition-stress sub-score (85) is the single highest on the table because SD–L friction is the modal public dispute pattern; a visible L defection (or pre-election L position-paper on research mobility) pushes DIW to 84. Source: party communications <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> [A1].</li>
@@ -523,14 +523,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>AU15 → 72</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code>): bounded 68–75. Stable. Precedent value (85) dominates because C190 ratification anchors future gender-equality and harassment litigation framework in Swedish labour-market model. Source: <code>HD01AU15</code> at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a> [A1].</li>
 <li><strong>CU29 → 58</strong>: bounded 52–62. Stable consensus item. Precedent value (55) is only moderate because home-charging regulation is incremental against the existing electricity and property legislation. Source: <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/infrastrukturdepartementet</a> [A2].</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-assignment">Priority tier assignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-assignment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-assignment">Priority tier assignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-assignment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>L2+ Priority</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>): depth-tier L2+ per-document analysis, chart data file, stakeholder network. <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a></li>
 <li><strong>L2 Strategic</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>): standard L2 per-document analysis. <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-completeness">Evidence completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-completeness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-completeness">Evidence completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-completeness"></a></h3>
 <p>All 5 rows cite a live <code>dok_id</code> resolvable via <code>get_dokument</code> + a primary-source URL on <code>data.riksdagen.se</code>. All auxiliary claims cite Kriminalvården, Riksbank, ILO, Regeringen primary URLs.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 (<code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>) at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> committee calendar (A1)</li>
@@ -539,10 +539,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> — ILO C190 / C155 / C187 citations for <code>HD01AU15</code> (A1)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: narrative-ecosystem analysis per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> §Strategic Communication.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on framing uptake.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-likely-outlet-level-framings">Likely outlet-level framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-outlet-level-framings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-likely-outlet-level-framings">Likely outlet-level framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-outlet-level-framings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-likely-outlet-level-framings">Likely outlet-level framings<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>CU25</th><th>SfU23</th><th>FiU23</th><th>AU15</th><th>CU29</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dagens Nyheter</strong></td><td>Delivery + procurement-risk focus</td><td>Proportionality + carve-out clarity focus</td><td>Institutional-independence focus</td><td>Late-ratification framing</td><td>Regressivity critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Svenska Dagbladet</strong></td><td>Tidö delivery-ledger positive</td><td>Carve-out competitiveness positive</td><td>Standing review, low-salience</td><td>Consensus positive</td><td>Cautious-positive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Aftonbladet (LED)</strong></td><td>Welfare-vs-prisons inversion critique</td><td>Abuse-framing critique + humanitarian</td><td>Recap-debate welfare-impact</td><td>Ratification positive</td><td>Climate-transition positive with equity caveat</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Expressen (LED)</strong></td><td>Delivery-ledger positive-sceptical</td><td>Abuse-prevention positive with carve-out caveats</td><td>Neutral standing review</td><td>Positive</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SVT Nyheter</strong></td><td>Balanced delivery + risk</td><td>Balanced tightening + carve-out</td><td>Institutional-review explainer</td><td>Positive ratification</td><td>Balanced regressivity discussion</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sveriges Radio Ekot</strong></td><td>Procedural + delivery detail</td><td>Institutional-balance focus</td><td>Central-bank governance</td><td>Positive</td><td>Distributive discussion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor">Narrative lines to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor">Narrative lines to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>"Fängelser före välfärd"</strong> (prisons before welfare) — S/V/MP-aligned inversion of Tidö delivery claim (CU25 focus).</li>
 <li><strong>"Konkurrenskraft vs. kontroll"</strong> (competitiveness vs. control) — L/C/business-oriented critique of SfU23 balance.</li>
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor">Narrative lines to monitor<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>"Sverige sist i Norden"</strong> (Sweden last in the Nordics) — opposition re-framing of AU15 delay.</li>
 <li><strong>"Elbil åt de redan rika"</strong> (EVs for those already wealthy) — V/MP/C distributive critique of CU29.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment">Disinformation vulnerability assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment">Disinformation vulnerability assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment">Disinformation vulnerability
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Vulnerability</th><th>Amplification vectors</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CU25</td><td>HIGH — capacity-data distortion, procurement-scandal amplification</td><td>Telegram, TikTok, Gab</td><td>Monitor MSB observatory (<a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a>) [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>SfU23</td><td>HIGH — abuse-narrative amplification</td><td>X/Twitter, Telegram</td><td>Monitor MSB + Migrationsverket press (<a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>) [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>FiU23</td><td>MEDIUM — central-bank crisis memes</td><td>Finance-Twitter, niche blogs</td><td>Riksbank communications (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>) [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>AU15</td><td>LOW</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>CU29</td><td>MEDIUM — regressivity meme amplification</td><td>X/Twitter</td><td><a href="https://www.naturvardsverket.se/">naturvardsverket.se</a> + <a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a> data clarity [A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-propagation-diagram">Framing-propagation diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-propagation-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-propagation-diagram">Framing-propagation diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-propagation-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     C[Cluster 2026-04-24]
     C --> Gov[Regeringskansliet framing]
@@ -679,17 +679,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-propagation-diagram">Framing-propagation diagram<a class="" a
     style Alt fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style Dis fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
     style Pub fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 <li>Regeringskansliet communications trend (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>) [A2]</li>
 <li>MSB disinformation observatory (<a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a>) [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens matrix from <code>analysis/methodologies/synthesis-methodology.md</code> — (1) Parties, (2) Government agencies, (3) Affected citizens / demographic groups, (4) Civil society / unions / employers, (5) Subnational government, (6) International / EU.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on party positions (A1–B2); MEDIUM on agency and civil society inference (B3–C3).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-master-stakeholder-table">Master stakeholder table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-stakeholder-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-stakeholder-table">Master stakeholder table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-stakeholder-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -869,18 +869,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-master-stakeholder-table">Master stakeholder table<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">CU25</th><th align="center">SfU23</th><th align="center">FiU23</th><th align="center">AU15</th><th align="center">CU29</th><th>Dominant lens</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderates)</td><td align="center">+++ lead</td><td align="center">++ support</td><td align="center">+ stewardship</td><td align="center">+ technical</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">+++ lead</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">± (defends carve-out)</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">+++ (max framing)</td><td align="center">− (Riksbank critical)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">−</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">± (crime triangulation)</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">−− (environmental)</td><td align="center">−−</td><td align="center">± (mandate critical)</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">−−</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">+++</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+ (carve-out champion)</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>Kriminalvården</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Migrationsverket</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++ (dual-track burden)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Arbetsmiljöverket / DO</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Boverket / Energimynd.</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Universities (SUHF)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Civil society</td></tr><tr><td>LO / TCO / Saco</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Civil society</td></tr><tr><td>Svenskt Näringsliv</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">− (cost)</td><td align="center">++</td><td>Civil society</td></tr><tr><td>Local councils (SKR)</td><td align="center">++ (host sites)</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++ (planning)</td><td>Subnational</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+ (Schengen)</td><td align="center">+ (ECB-aligned)</td><td align="center">+++ (ILO)</td><td align="center">++ (Fit for 55)</td><td>International</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Legend: <code>+++</code> strong support, <code>++</code> support, <code>+</code> mild support, <code>±</code> split / conditional, <code>0</code> neutral / N/A, <code>−</code> opposed, <code>−−</code> strong opposition.</p>
 <p>Sources: party group communications at <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/partierna</a> [A1]; agency mandate references at <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>, <a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>, <a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a> [A2]; civil-society baselines at <a href="https://www.suhf.se/">suhf.se</a>, <a href="https://www.lo.se/">lo.se</a>, <a href="https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/">svensktnaringsliv.se</a> [B2]; SKR baseline at <a href="https://www.skr.se/">skr.se</a> [A2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative">Per-document stakeholder narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity">HD01CU25 — prison capacity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative">Per-document stakeholder narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity">HD01CU25 — prison capacity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: Kriminalvården (mandate expansion), local councils hosting new sites (employment + infrastructure), construction sector. <strong>Losers</strong>: local councils at risk of environmental-carve-out procedural strain; MP/V constituencies on environmental grounds. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: Kriminalvården Q2 status report — sets delivery credibility. Evidence: <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se/om-oss/verksamhet/anstalter-och-hakten</a>, <code>HD01CU25</code> [A2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers">HD01SfU23 — migration / researchers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers">HD01SfU23 — migration / researchers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: Sweden's university sector (SUHF advocacy group) on carve-out; Migrationsverket enforcement division. <strong>Losers</strong>: international students under abuse-prevention tightening; civil-society immigrant-rights orgs. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: SUHF + individual research-university rectors (KTH, KI, Lund, Uppsala) — their position determines L defection probability. Evidence: <a href="https://www.suhf.se/">suhf.se</a>, <code>HD01SfU23</code> [A2/B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025">HD01FiU23 — Riksbank 2025<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025">HD01FiU23 — Riksbank 2025<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: Riksbank General Council (standing affirmation); financial-stability interests. <strong>Losers</strong>: none direct; V rhetorical loss. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: FiU chair — sequencing of recapitalisation hearing vs. annual review. Evidence: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a>, <code>HD01FiU23</code> [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions">HD01AU15 — ILO conventions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions">HD01AU15 — ILO conventions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: LO/TCO/Saco (negotiating leverage); Arbetsmiljöverket/DO (mandate clarification); women and gender-minority workers (C190 scope). <strong>Losers</strong>: small employers on compliance-cost margin. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: Arbetsmiljöverket guidance capacity. Evidence: <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>, <a href="https://www.lo.se/">lo.se</a>, <code>HD01AU15</code> [A1/B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging">HD01CU29 — EV charging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging">HD01CU29 — EV charging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: homeowners with detached dwellings (primary subsidy beneficiaries); EV OEMs; Energimyndigheten. <strong>Losers</strong>: tenants in multi-dwelling buildings without assigned parking (design gap); grid-peak cost allocation may fall on non-EV households. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: Boverket regulatory draft. Evidence: <a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     Tidö["Tidö coalition&#x3C;br/>M/KD/L/SD"] --> CU25
     Tidö --> SfU23
@@ -907,14 +907,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style MV fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style RB fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style LO fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h3>
 <p>See master table for per-row citations. All party positions inferred from published 2025–26 party group statements and prior-vote record at <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/voteringar</a>.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: leading indicator register for +30 d / +60 d / +90 d / +180 d horizons.
 <strong>Standards</strong>: each indicator has owner, source URL, expected date, and detection signal.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2) on sources; MEDIUM (C3) on expected-date predictions.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators">Indicator register (≥ 10 dated indicators)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators">Indicator register (≥ 10 dated indicators)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators">Indicator register (≥ 10 d
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Horizon</th><th align="center">Expected date</th><th>Owner/Source</th><th>Signal</th><th>PIR link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">I1</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 2026 capacity status</td><td align="center">+60 d</td><td align="center">2026-06-23</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2]</td><td>± 5 % of plan → S1; > 10 % slip → S2</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I2</td><td>SfU23 implementation ordinance published</td><td align="center">+90 d</td><td align="center">2026-07-20</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Carve-out scope wording determines L-posture</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I3</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen PT on SfU23 test case</td><td align="center">+180 d</td><td align="center">rolling (by 2026-10)</td><td><a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> [A1]</td><td>PT granted → S3 activation</td><td>PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I4</td><td>FiU separate recapitalisation hearing schedule</td><td align="center">+30 d</td><td align="center">2026-05-24</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a> [A1]</td><td>Separate hearing → KJ-4 ≥ 0.45 confirmed</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I5</td><td>Migrationsverket IT transformation programme status</td><td align="center">+90 d</td><td align="center">2026-07-20</td><td><a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Status-red → SfU23 cascade risk elevated</td><td>PIR-4</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I6</td><td>Arbetsmiljöverket C190 implementation guidance</td><td align="center">+180 d</td><td align="center">2026-10-22</td><td><a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Publication on time → AU15 on track</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I7</td><td>Liberalerna party-group position paper</td><td align="center">+30 d</td><td align="center">2026-05-23</td><td><a href="https://www.liberalerna.se/">liberalerna.se</a> [B2]</td><td>Published position on CU25/SfU23 → confirms defection risk posture</td><td>PIR-6</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I8</td><td>MSB disinformation observatory — SfU23 / CU25 narrative volume</td><td align="center">rolling</td><td align="center">weekly to 2026-09</td><td><a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Spike → campaign-impact risk elevated</td><td>PIR-7</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I9</td><td>Novus / Sifo polling May-June 2026 wave</td><td align="center">+30 d → +60 d</td><td align="center">2026-05 → 2026-06</td><td><a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a> / <a href="https://sifo.se/">sifo.se</a> [B2]</td><td>Tidö bloc Δ ≥ ± 1.5 pp</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I10</td><td>Riksbank 2026 Q2 penningpolitisk rapport</td><td align="center">+90 d</td><td align="center">2026-07-02</td><td><a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> [A1]</td><td>Balance-sheet narrative trigger → S4 activation</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I11</td><td>Kriminalvården procurement-award announcements</td><td align="center">+60 d → +90 d</td><td align="center">rolling 2026-05 → 2026-07</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Awards on schedule → S1; challenges/appeals → S2</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I12</td><td>Riksrevisionen audit notifications</td><td align="center">+180 d</td><td align="center">by 2026-10</td><td><a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a> [A2]</td><td>New audit on CU25 or SfU23 → escalation signal</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I13</td><td>Nordic Council / EU-level coverage of AU15 + CU29</td><td align="center">rolling</td><td align="center">by 2026-07</td><td><a href="https://www.norden.org/">norden.org</a> [B3]</td><td>Major coverage → S5 activation</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I14</td><td>Opposition motion filings referencing CU25 / SfU23</td><td align="center">rolling</td><td align="center">weekly to 2026-06</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> [A1]</td><td>Volume surge → framing intensification</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I15</td><td>S/V/MP coordinated press-event windows</td><td align="center">+30 d → +60 d</td><td align="center">2026-05 → 2026-06</td><td><a href="https://www.socialdemokraterna.se/">socialdemokraterna.se</a> [B3]</td><td>Coordinated timing → campaign alignment signal</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-stacked-diagram">Horizon-stacked diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-stacked-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-stacked-diagram">Horizon-stacked diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-stacked-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     B[Base 2026-04-24]
     B --> H30[+30d indicators]
@@ -1108,41 +1108,41 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-stacked-diagram">Horizon-stacked diagram<a class="" aria-hidd
     I6 AV C190 guidance           :d2, 2026-09-01, 60d
     I12 Riksrevisionen audits     :d3, 2026-08-01, 90d
     I13 Nordic/EU coverage        :d4, 2026-05-01, 90d</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-score">Priority score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-score">Priority score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-score"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>P0</strong> (report-triggering): I1, I2, I4, I11 — directly drive scenario transitions.</li>
 <li><strong>P1</strong> (signal-confirming): I3, I5, I7, I10, I12 — confirm/disconfirm mainline judgments.</li>
 <li><strong>P2</strong> (contextual): I6, I8, I9, I13, I14, I15 — frame movement in surrounding narrative space.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All indicator sources cited above [A1–B3]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/strategic-extensions-methodology.md</code> (Alternative futures + leading indicators).
 <strong>Horizon</strong>: baseline 2026-04-24 → Sep 2026 general election → 2027 H1 implementation.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM overall (C3); HIGH on event set (B2), MEDIUM on probability weighting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 100 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-">Scenario 1 — "Signature delivery locked in" (p = 40 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 100 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-">Scenario 1 — "Signature delivery locked in" (p = 40 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-"></a></h4>
 <p>CU25 Kriminalvården capacity report (+60 d) confirms on-track delivery; SfU23 transposes cleanly with researcher-carve-out operational by 2026 Q3; FiU23 passes without recapitalisation drama. Tidö enters Sep 2026 election with credible delivery ledger. Leading indicator: <strong>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status within ± 5 % of plan</strong> (<a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2], <code>HD01CU25</code>).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-">Scenario 2 — "Partial inversion on CU25" (p = 25 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-">Scenario 2 — "Partial inversion on CU25" (p = 25 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-"></a></h4>
 <p>CU25 timeline slips ≥ 10 %; SfU23 and FiU23 land cleanly. Opposition weaponises delivery gap; Tidö still holds net-positive delivery narrative on migration and monetary stewardship. Leading indicator: <strong>Kriminalvården Q2 report reveals > 10 % capacity shortfall OR Riksrevisionen audit flags procurement</strong> (<a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a> [A2]).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-">Scenario 3 — "Migration legal cascade" (p = 15 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-">Scenario 3 — "Migration legal cascade" (p = 15 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-"></a></h4>
 <p>Migrationsöverdomstolen issues adverse proportionality ruling on SfU23 abuse-prevention provisions; Migrationsverket IT build slips ≥ 6 months. SfU23 becomes a liability. Leading indicator: <strong>Domstolsväsendet prövningstillstånd on SfU23 test case OR MV transformation-programme status flagged at Digg</strong> (<a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a>, <a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a> [B2], <code>HD01SfU23</code>).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-">Scenario 4 — "Institutional-credibility crisis" (p = 12 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-">Scenario 4 — "Institutional-credibility crisis" (p = 12 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-"></a></h4>
 <p>Riksbank recapitalisation becomes 2026 chamber-floor debate triggered by FiU23 review, dragging out into June 2026. V and MP amplify mandate questions; L and C protect independence. Leading indicator: <strong>FiU scheduling a separate recapitalisation hearing OR Riksbank publication of extraordinary balance-sheet communication</strong> (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> [A1], <code>HD01FiU23</code>).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-">Scenario 5 — "Broad-consensus windfall" (p = 8 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-">Scenario 5 — "Broad-consensus windfall" (p = 8 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-"></a></h4>
 <p>AU15 ratification + CU29 EV-charging rollout generate unexpectedly large reputational dividends (Nordic + EU media); Tidö leverages into a L-led pre-election consensus pivot. Probability low because these are not campaign-decisive issues. Leading indicator: <strong>Nordic Council coverage of AU15 ratification debate OR major EU climate outlet coverage of CU29 model</strong> (<a href="https://www.norden.org/">norden.org</a> [B3], <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram">Scenario likelihood diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram">Scenario likelihood diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Scenario probabilities (Sep 2026 horizon)
     "S1 Signature delivery locked in" : 40
     "S2 Partial inversion on CU25" : 25
     "S3 Migration legal cascade" : 15
     "S4 Institutional-credibility crisis" : 12
     "S5 Broad-consensus windfall" : 8</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-branching-tree">Branching tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-branching-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-branching-tree">Branching tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-branching-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Base[2026-04-24 baseline]
     Base --> Q2[Q2 2026 status cycle]
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-branching-tree">Branching tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
     style E3 fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style E4 fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style E5 fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-indicators-summary">Key indicators summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-indicators-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-indicators-summary">Key indicators summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-indicators-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1210,14 +1210,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-indicators-summary">Key indicators summary<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Leading indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity within ± 5 % of plan</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a></td><td>+60 d</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Capacity shortfall > 10 % OR Riksrevisionen audit flag</td><td><a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a></td><td>+60 d to +120 d</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen PT granted on SfU23 test case</td><td><a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a></td><td>+90 d to +180 d</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>FiU separate recap hearing scheduled</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a></td><td>+30 d to +60 d</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Nordic Council or EU media major AU15 / CU29 coverage</td><td><a href="https://www.norden.org/">norden.org</a></td><td>+60 d to +180 d</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-7">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-7">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-7"></a></h3>
 <p><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 at data.riksdagen.se; agency + judicial leading indicators cited above.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> (5 dimensions: Institutional, Operational, Fiscal, Political-reputational, Legal-compliance).
 <strong>Method</strong>: Likelihood (L, 1–5) × Impact (I, 1–5) → Risk score (1–25). Cascading chains + posterior probabilities via Bayesian update where prior data exists.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on top-3 risks (B2); MEDIUM on tail risks (C3).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th>Source doc</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Posterior</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">R1</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Kriminalvården capacity timeline slippage ≥ 10 % vs. plan</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">55 % (prior 45 %, updated on 2024 capacity-report miss pattern)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a>, <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R2</td><td>Legal-compliance</td><td>SfU23 abuse-prevention provisions challenged on proportionality at Migrationsöverdomstolen</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">40 % (prior 35 %, updated on 2024 SfU permit-revocation jurisprudence)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>, <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> [B3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R3</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>CU25 construction cost overrun ≥ 20 % vs. Kriminalvården 2025 baseline</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">50 % (prior 40 %, updated on 2022–24 major infra cost-overrun pattern)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a>, <a href="https://www.esv.se/">esv.se</a> [B2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R4</td><td>Political-reputational</td><td>Riksbank recapitalisation becomes 2026 chamber-floor debate, eclipsing FiU23 standing review</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">45 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a>, <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> [A2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R5</td><td>Operational</td><td>Migrationsverket dual-track IT build on SfU23 delayed by ≥ 6 months</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">55 % (prior 50 %, updated on 2023–24 MV IT-project slippage base rate)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>, <a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a> [B2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R6</td><td>Legal-compliance</td><td>ILO C190 transposition timing pressure from 2027 reporting cycle</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">40 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a>, <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R7</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>CU29 home-charging subsidy regressivity (upper-income capture > 60 %)</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">50 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a>, <a href="https://www.ei.se/">ei.se</a> [C3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R8</td><td>Political-reputational</td><td>L defection on SfU23 researcher carve-out if SD maximalist</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">30 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>, L party 2026 position papers <a href="https://www.liberalerna.se/">liberalerna.se</a> [C3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R9</td><td>Operational</td><td>AU15 Arbetsmiljöverket guidance gap creates employer-compliance ambiguity</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">45 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a> [B3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R10</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Post-2026 government change disrupts CU25 multi-year delivery commitment</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">40 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk heat map (L × I)
     x-axis Low likelihood --> High likelihood
@@ -1364,8 +1364,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     "R8 L defection": [0.35, 0.58]
     "R9 AU15 guidance": [0.55, 0.38]
     "R10 Post-election handover": [0.55, 0.78]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse">Chain A: Delivery-credibility collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse">Chain A: Delivery-credibility collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     R1[R1 Capacity slip] --> M1[Media: Kriminalvården misses plan]
     R3[R3 Cost overrun] --> M1
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse">Chain A: Delivery-credibility
     style P1 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style El fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
 <p>Joint probability ≥ 1 R1/R3/R10 event within 2026 Q3: ~ 0.70. If joint ≥ 2 events: ~ 0.40. Source: Bayesian update on 2022–24 base rates — <code>kriminalvarden.se</code> annual reports, ESV major-project tracking.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade">Chain B: Migration legal–operational cascade<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade">Chain B: Migration legal–operational cascade<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     R2[R2 Proportionality challenge] --> Court[Migrationsöverdomstolen injunction]
     R5[R5 MV IT slip] --> Op[Migrationsverket handling-time surge]
@@ -1392,21 +1392,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade">Chain B: Migration legal
     style Court fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Op fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Pol fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigations-recommended">Mitigations (recommended)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-recommended"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigations-recommended">Mitigations (recommended)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-recommended"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R1 / R3 / R10</strong> — Kriminalvården quarterly capacity-status publication cadence, with KU pre-flagging the Q2 2026 status report. Cost: low. Source: <code>HD01CU25</code> + Kriminalvården standard reporting.</li>
 <li><strong>R2 / R5</strong> — Pre-enactment Migrationsverket IT architecture review by PTS/Digg; proportionality impact assessment published alongside ordinance. Source: <code>HD01SfU23</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>R4</strong> — FiU to schedule Riksbank recapitalisation hearing separately from annual review to separate narratives. Source: <code>HD01FiU23</code>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-8">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-8">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Every row cites <code>dok_id</code> + authoritative implementation agency URL (kriminalvarden.se, migrationsverket.se, riksbank.se, ilo.org, ei.se, domstol.se, av.se).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code> + TOWS matrix.
 <strong>Scope</strong>: the 5-report cluster tabled 2026-04-23.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">S1</td><td>High-salience delivery signal for Tidö on crime + migration</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> prison expansion scope + <code>HD01SfU23</code> tighter study-permit controls (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>)</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S2</td><td>Institutional-stewardship credibility via standing Riksbank review</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> continues annual FiU review per <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S3</td><td>Consensus cover on labour + climate</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO C190/C155/C187) + <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV charging) at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a> and <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S4</td><td>Researcher carve-out in SfU23 protects competitiveness narrative</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> carve-out for forskare/doktorander at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S5</td><td>Cross-committee composition demonstrates coalition working throughput</td><td>CU+SfU+FiU+AU all tabled same day (5 reports) per <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> calendar</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">W1</td><td>CU25 procurement and environmental-permit compression exposes legal challenge risk</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> expansion timeline vs. Kriminalvården planning baseline (<a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>)</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W2</td><td>SfU23 dual-track (tightening + carve-out) doubles Migrationsverket IT and caseworker load</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> scope + Migrationsverket 2025 annual report handling-time trend (<a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>)</td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W3</td><td>FiU23 re-opens the unresolved balance-sheet / recapitalisation narrative</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> on Riksbank 2025 per <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> and prior <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a> metadata</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W4</td><td>AU15 ratification timing (Sweden among the later ratifiers of C190) is defensive framing</td><td>ILO ratifications list at <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>; Denmark 2022, Finland 2023</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W5</td><td>CU29 funding model for home-charging subsidies is underspecified in the report title scope</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">O1</td><td>Pair AU15 ratification with EU Platform Work Directive transposition for EU-policy reputational dividend</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + EU PWD transposition deadline references at <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/arbetsmarknadsdepartementet</a></td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O2</td><td>Use CU29 to anchor 2026 climate pillar for L/C/MP-curious voters</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> + Energimyndigheten charging-infrastructure baseline (<a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a>)</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O3</td><td>SfU23 carve-out creates bilateral positioning space with Nordic research partners</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> carve-out + Nordic Council of Ministers research mobility programmes</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O4</td><td>FiU23 review anchors standing inflation-credibility message pre-election</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> + <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se Penningpolitisk rapport</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O5</td><td>CU25 procurement velocity creates civil-construction jobs in low-population regions</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + Kriminalvården planned sites at <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a></td><td align="center">B2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">T1</td><td>CU25 timeline slippage inverts crime-delivery narrative pre-election</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + prior Kriminalvården capacity-report miss pattern <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se/om-oss</a></td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T2</td><td>SfU23 abuse-prevention provisions face judicial review on proportionality</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + Migrationsöverdomstolen jurisprudence at <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a></td><td align="center">B3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T3</td><td>Riksbank recapitalisation becomes 2026 debate focal point</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> + <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> 2023–24 annual reports</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T4</td><td>ILO ratification + transposition creates compliance litigation baseline for employers</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + Svenskt Näringsliv position papers at <a href="https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/">svensktnaringsliv.se</a></td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T5</td><td>CU29 home-charging incentives capture by grid-peak cost allocation creates regressive effect</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> + Energimarknadsinspektionen tariff framework <a href="https://www.ei.se/">ei.se</a></td><td align="center">C3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies">TOWS matrix (derived strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies">TOWS matrix (derived strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1600,13 +1600,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies">TOWS matrix (derived strategies)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>S (internal +)</th><th>W (internal -)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>O (external +)</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Pair S1+S3 with O1+O2 — message "delivery + EU-compatible workers' rights + climate" (<code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>)</td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Use O1 (EU PWD pair) to offset W4 (late ratification) narrative on <code>HD01AU15</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>T (external -)</strong></td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Use S2 institutional credibility (<code>HD01FiU23</code>) to preempt T3 balance-sheet narrative</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: Pre-publish Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status to defuse W1+T1 combination on <code>HD01CU25</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters">Cross-SWOT integration (policy clusters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters">Cross-SWOT integration (policy clusters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Law-and-order delivery cluster</strong> (CU25 ↔ SfU23): S1+S4 combine with T1+T2 — if CU25 timeline slips <em>and</em> SfU23 gets judicial pushback, the combined narrative inversion is larger than either alone. Source: <code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Institutional-stewardship cluster</strong> (FiU23 ↔ AU15): S2+O4 combine to anchor a pre-election "responsible management" frame; T3 is the counter-frame. Source: <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Climate-mobility cluster</strong> (CU29 only): isolated; O2 creates option to pair with future CU committee agenda. Source: <code>HD01CU29</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-diagram">Cluster diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-diagram">Cluster diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
     S1["S1 Delivery signal&#x3C;br/>CU25+SfU23"]
     S2["S2 Institutional&#x3C;br/>FiU23"]
@@ -1625,15 +1625,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-diagram">Cluster diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style ST fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style ST2 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style NarrInv fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-9">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-9">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-9"></a></h3>
 <p>All rows cite <code>dok_id</code> + primary-source URL. See <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> for policy-cluster citations.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> — Political Threat Taxonomy with attack tree + kill chain + MITRE-style TTP mapping.
 <strong>Scope</strong>: threats to democratic institutions, policy integrity, and epistemic environment arising from today's 5-report cluster.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — intent signals are indirect; capability signals are well-attested.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category">Threat taxonomy (per-category)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-institutional-threats">Institutional threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category">Threat taxonomy (per-category)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-institutional-threats">Institutional threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-institutional-threats">Institutional threats<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">T#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th>Kill-chain stage</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">TI-1</td><td>Erosion of Riksbank independence perception via recapitalisation debate conflation</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> + 2023–24 <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> balance-sheet reports</td><td>Weaponise (rhetorical framing)</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TI-2</td><td>CU25 planning-law carve-outs normalising shortcut procedure for future infra</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + Miljöbalken 6 kap references (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/dokument/1998:808</a>)</td><td>Install (precedent)</td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TI-3</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen caseload surge degrading appeal-quality on SfU23</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> appeal-handling-time metric</td><td>Impact (institutional capacity)</td><td align="center">B3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-policy-integrity-threats">Policy-integrity threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-policy-integrity-threats">Policy-integrity threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-integrity-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-policy-integrity-threats">Policy-integrity threats<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">T#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th>Kill-chain stage</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">TP-1</td><td>SfU23 abuse-prevention scope-creep via ministerial ordinance</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + regeringsformen 8:7 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/regeringsformen</a>)</td><td>Exploit (delegated power)</td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TP-2</td><td>CU29 subsidy capture by property-developer lobby re-routing design</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> + public consultation history on energy/property interface (<a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>)</td><td>Exploit (regulatory-design)</td><td align="center">C3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TP-3</td><td>AU15 employer-compliance guidance thinning under ratification-without-resources dynamic</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a> resource trajectory</td><td>Impact (enforcement gap)</td><td align="center">B3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-epistemic--information-threats">Epistemic / information threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-epistemic--information-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-epistemic--information-threats">Epistemic / information threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-epistemic--information-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-epistemic--information-threats">Epistemic / information threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">T#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th>Kill-chain stage</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">TE-1</td><td>Disinformation campaigns amplifying CU25 slippage to delegitimise 2026 incumbent</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + MSB disinfo baseline <a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a></td><td>Amplify</td><td align="center">C3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TE-2</td><td>Social-media narrative lock-in on SfU23 "abuse" framing ahead of researcher-carve-out media cycle</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + MSB / Diggs reports</td><td>Reconnaissance/Amplify</td><td align="center">C3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TE-3</td><td>Polarised framing of ILO C190 as foreign-imposed on Swedish labour model</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a> ratification coverage</td><td>Weaponise</td><td align="center">D3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative">Attack tree — CU25 delegitimisation (illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative">Attack tree — CU25 delegitimisation (illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Goal[Goal: Delegitimise&#x3C;br/>CU25 delivery claim]
     A[A. Exploit timeline slip]
@@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative">Attack tree — CU25
     style B2 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style C1 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style C2 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-mapping">Kill chain mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-mapping">Kill chain mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-mapping">Kill chain mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>CU25 pathway</th><th>SfU23 pathway</th><th>FiU23 pathway</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Public capacity plans, procurement notices</td><td>Migrationsverket quarterly statistics</td><td>Riksbank annual report</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponise</td><td>Narrative framing kits, think-tank briefings</td><td>Social-media framing templates</td><td>Opinion editorial placement</td></tr><tr><td>Deliver</td><td>Press cycle, chamber debate, KU hearings</td><td>Chamber debate, court filings</td><td>FiU hearings, floor debate</td></tr><tr><td>Exploit</td><td>Procedural motion, amendment</td><td>Test case at Migrationsöverdomstolen</td><td>Independent-review motion</td></tr><tr><td>Install</td><td>Precedent on planning-law shortcut</td><td>Precedent on proportionality threshold</td><td>Precedent on recapitalisation procedure</td></tr><tr><td>Impact</td><td>Delivery credibility</td><td>Appeal capacity + research mobility</td><td>Monetary-policy credibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map">MITRE-style political TTP map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map">MITRE-style political TTP map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1860,38 +1860,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map">MITRE-style political TTP map<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP ID</th><th>Technique</th><th>Instantiation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PT-RE-001</td><td>Reconnaissance: official statistics harvesting</td><td>Kriminalvården quarterly reports on <code>HD01CU25</code></td></tr><tr><td>PT-WE-002</td><td>Weaponise: narrative framing kits</td><td>Opposition think-tank briefings on CU25 / SfU23</td></tr><tr><td>PT-DE-003</td><td>Deliver: chamber debate staging</td><td>FiU / SfU / CU scheduled plenaries</td></tr><tr><td>PT-EX-004</td><td>Exploit: judicial review</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen on <code>HD01SfU23</code></td></tr><tr><td>PT-IN-005</td><td>Install: precedent anchoring</td><td>Planning-law carve-out on <code>HD01CU25</code></td></tr><tr><td>PT-IM-006</td><td>Impact: institutional-credibility erosion</td><td>Riksbank independence narrative on <code>HD01FiU23</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-prioritisation">Threat prioritisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-prioritisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-prioritisation">Threat prioritisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-prioritisation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>P1 (active, monitor)</strong>: TI-1 (Riksbank narrative), TI-2 (CU25 planning precedent), TI-3 (Migration court capacity).</li>
 <li><strong>P2 (latent, prepare)</strong>: TP-1 (SfU23 ordinance scope-creep), TE-1 (CU25 disinfo).</li>
 <li><strong>P3 (watch)</strong>: TP-2 / TP-3 / TE-2 / TE-3.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-10">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-10">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-10"></a></h3>
 <p>All threats cited with <code>dok_id</code> + primary agency URL. Epistemic threats calibrated against <a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a> disinformation baseline (2023–25 reports, B2).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01au15">HD01AU15<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Arbetsmarknadsutskottet (AU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 45
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Internationell arbetsrätt; ILO C190 trolig huvudfokus. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/au</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Internationella arbetsorganisationens (ILO) konventioner, protokoll och rekommendationer"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Arbetsmarknadsutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 45</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -1903,7 +1903,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01AU15] --> C[AU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -1912,36 +1912,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 45 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-11">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-11">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-11"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01AU15"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25">HD01CU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 85
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>+8 500 häktes-/anstaltsplatser över 2026–2030; planlagsundantag. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-1">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-1">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/cu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-1">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-1">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Kriminalvårdens kapacitet"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Civilutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 85</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-1">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-1">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -1953,7 +1953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-1">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-1">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-1">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01CU25] --> C[CU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -1962,36 +1962,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-1">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-1">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-1">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 85 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-12">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-12">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-12"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01CU25"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu29">HD01CU29<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 50
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Laddbox/typ-2 subsidieregim; Boverket + Energimyndigheten. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-2">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-2">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01CU29</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/cu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-2">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-2">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Laddning av elfordon i det egna hemmet"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Civilutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 50</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-2">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-2">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-2">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-2">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-2">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01CU29] --> C[CU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -2012,36 +2012,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-2">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-2">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-2">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 50 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-13">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-13">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-13"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01CU29"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23">HD01FiU23<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 65
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Balansräkning 2024–25, rekapitaliseringsfråga latent. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-3">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-3">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01FiU23</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/fiu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-3">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-3">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Riksbankens verksamhet 2025"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Finansutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 65</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-3">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-3">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-3">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-3">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-3">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01FiU23] --> C[FiU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -2062,36 +2062,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-3">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-3">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-3">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 65 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-14">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-14">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-14"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01FiU23"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23">HD01SfU23<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 80
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Dubbelspår: skärpning + forskarundantag. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-4">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-4">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/sfu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-4">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-4">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Migration, arbetskraft och forskare"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Socialförsäkringsutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 80</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-4">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-4">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-4">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-4">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-4">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-4"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01SfU23] --> C[SfU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -2112,18 +2112,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-4">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-4">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-4">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 80 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-15">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-15">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-15"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01SfU23"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Horizon</strong>: Sep 2026 general election (~140 days from base date).
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on electoral impact inferences; HIGH (B2) on delivery-indicator logic.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items">Electoral salience ranking of cluster items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items">Electoral salience ranking of cluster items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2166,20 +2166,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items">Electoral salience ranki
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th align="center">Electoral salience (0-100)</th><th>Base for rating</th><th>Expected voter segments activated</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity</td><td align="center">95</td><td>Top-3 voter priority (law-and-order) per 2025 Q4 Novus/Sifo</td><td>M, KD, SD base + swing-urban swing</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers</td><td align="center">80</td><td>Top-5 voter priority (migration)</td><td>SD base + competitiveness-minded M/L</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank</td><td align="center">55</td><td>Elite-salient, low mass-salient</td><td>Finance-sector, urban professional</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO</td><td align="center">35</td><td>Low mass-salient, HR/labour niche</td><td>Unionised workers, liberal professional</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging</td><td align="center">45</td><td>Moderate suburban-detached-housing salient</td><td>M suburban, MP climate, L suburban</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-likely-campaign-framings">Likely campaign framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-campaign-framings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tidö-framings-pro">Tidö framings (pro)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-framings-pro"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-likely-campaign-framings">Likely campaign framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-campaign-framings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tidö-framings-pro">Tidö framings (pro)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-framings-pro"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Delivery ledger</strong>: "Vi levererar: 8 500 nya häktes-/anstaltsplatser (CU25), stramare migration med kompetensskydd (SfU23), ansvarsfull ekonomi (FiU23)."</li>
 <li><strong>Breadth</strong>: "Vi ratificerar också internationella arbetsnormer (AU15) och stöttar omställningen (CU29)."</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-opposition-framings-contra">Opposition framings (contra)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framings-contra"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opposition-framings-contra">Opposition framings (contra)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framings-contra"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S</strong> — "Tidö misslyckas med välfärd medan man bygger fängelser" (social-priority inversion).</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong> — "Institutionella fundament urholkas" (Riksbank + Riksrevisionen framing).</li>
 <li><strong>MP</strong> — "Klimatomställning underprioriteras jämfört med straffskärpning."</li>
 <li><strong>C</strong> — "Kommunalt självbestämmande undergrävs av CU25-planlagsundantag."</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-potential-inflection-points">Potential inflection points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-potential-inflection-points"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-potential-inflection-points">Potential inflection points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-potential-inflection-points"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2216,12 +2216,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-potential-inflection-points">Potential inflection points<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date (approx)</th><th>Event</th><th>Expected electoral consequence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-06-23</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status</td><td>If on-track: CU25 becomes campaign asset (+2 pp M/KD); if slip ≥ 10 %: CU25 becomes liability (-1.5 pp Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07</td><td>SfU23 implementation ordinance</td><td>Defines L's in-coalition posture; carve-out clarity +0.5 pp L</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08</td><td>Riksbank penningpolitisk rapport</td><td>Could trigger FiU recap debate surge (+1 pp V, -0.5 pp Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08</td><td>Migration-permit Q2 stats</td><td>If abuse-statistic drops: SfU23 asset; else liability</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09</td><td>General election</td><td>Outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication">Coalition-stress electoral implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication">Coalition-stress electoral implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SD–L stress</strong> on SfU23 is contained (&#x3C; 20 % defection probability per KJ-3). L electorate (urban liberal, university towns) responsive to carve-out framing.</li>
 <li><strong>M–KD stress</strong> on CU29 subsidy cost is low-grade; KD electorate (suburban family) receptive to distributive framing.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-polling-impact">Expected polling impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-polling-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-polling-impact">Expected polling impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-polling-impact"></a></h3>
 <p>Based on Bayesian update on 2022–24 committee-report clusters:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>If delivery on CU25 + SfU23</strong>: Tidö bloc +1.5 to +3 pp through August 2026.</li>
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expected-polling-impact">Expected polling impact<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>If slip on both</strong>: Tidö bloc -1.5 to -3 pp; opposition bloc +1 to +2 pp.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Prior distribution P(delivery-on-track) = 0.45; P(CU25-only-slip) = 0.30; P(both-slip) = 0.25.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram">Cluster-level electoral impact diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram">Cluster-level electoral impact diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     C[Committee Cluster 2026-04-24]
     C --> CU25E[CU25 Salience 95]
@@ -2255,17 +2255,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram">Cluster-level electoral impac
     style Opp fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cons fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Sep fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-16">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-16">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-16"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.val.se/">val.se</a> (election calendar) [A1]</li>
 <li>Novus/Sifo 2025 Q4 priority rankings (<a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a>) [B2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Current 2022–2026 Riksdag arithmetic applied to cluster-item voting scenarios.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2) on seat counts; MEDIUM (C3) on defection probabilities.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat">Current Riksdag seat distribution (349 mandat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat">Current Riksdag seat distribution (349 mandat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2328,8 +2328,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat">Current Riksdag seat di
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="center">Mandat</th><th>Block</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Tidö (confidence &#x26; supply)</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>Majority 175</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>173</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Source: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/ledamoter-och-partier</a> [A1].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-floor-vote-projections">Expected floor vote projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-floor-vote-projections"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-floor-vote-projections">Expected floor vote projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-floor-vote-projections"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU25</code> pri
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">173</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Outcome: adopted 176-173. Tidö margin 3 seats — no defections tolerable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2489,7 +2489,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"><code>HD01SfU23</co
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">173</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Conditional on L staying: adopted 176-173. If L defects (&#x3C; 20 % probability per KJ-3): 160-189, defeated.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank 2025 — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank 2025 — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2569,7 +2569,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"><code>HD01FiU23</code> Rik
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">307</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">42</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Broad-consensus review — expected adoption 307-42.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO ratification — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO ratification — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2649,7 +2649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"><code>HD01AU15</code> IL
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">276</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Expected adoption 276-73 with SD opposition likely (nationalist frame).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2729,7 +2729,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU29</code> EV
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">173</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Adopted 176-0; opposition abstains (distributive critique but not full opposition).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline">Post-election 2026 scenarios (350 polling + Sifo baseline)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline">Post-election 2026 scenarios (350 polling + Sifo baseline)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline">Post-electio
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario (Q4 2025)</th><th align="center">Tidö Σ</th><th align="center">Opposition Σ</th><th align="center">Delta from current</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Base-polling projection</td><td align="center">165-170</td><td align="center">179-184</td><td align="center">Tidö loses majority</td></tr><tr><td>Optimistic-delivery projection</td><td align="center">172-178</td><td align="center">171-177</td><td align="center">Knife-edge</td></tr><tr><td>Pessimistic-slip projection</td><td align="center">158-164</td><td align="center">185-191</td><td align="center">Opposition majority ≥ 12</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram">Coalition arithmetic diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram">Coalition arithmetic diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     T[Tidö 176 mandat]
     O[Opposition 173 mandat]
@@ -2792,17 +2792,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram">Coalition arithmetic diagram<a class=""
     style V fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style C fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style MP fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-17">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-17">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-17"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/ledamoter-och-partier</a> seat distribution [A1]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 <li>Q4 2025 polling: Novus, Sifo, Demoskop aggregates [B2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Segmentation framework</strong>: Swedish voter archetypes (7 segments) × cluster items.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on activation probabilities.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-segment--item-activation-matrix">Segment × item activation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment--item-activation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment--item-activation-matrix">Segment × item activation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment--item-activation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2882,19 +2882,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment--item-activation-matrix">Segment × item activation matrix<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th align="center">CU25</th><th align="center">SfU23</th><th align="center">FiU23</th><th align="center">AU15</th><th align="center">CU29</th><th align="center">Net activation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1. Law-and-order prioritisers</strong> (≈ 18 %)</td><td align="center">HIGH+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">CU25-driven, Tidö-favourable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2. Welfare-state defenders</strong> (≈ 22 %)</td><td align="center">HIGH−</td><td align="center">MEDIUM−</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">CU25-inversion, opposition-favourable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>3. Urban liberal professionals</strong> (≈ 12 %)</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">L-leaning if carve-out + delivery clean</td></tr><tr><td><strong>4. Suburban family voters</strong> (≈ 20 %)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">Mixed; housing/CU29 gateway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>5. Union and public-sector workers</strong> (≈ 15 %)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM−</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">S-leaning; AU15 is gain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>6. Climate / environment voters</strong> (≈ 7 %)</td><td align="center">LOW−</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">CU29-driven, MP/L-favourable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>7. Rural / small-town voters</strong> (≈ 6 %)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM−</td><td align="center">C-leaning; CU29 distributive concern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Percentages approximate 2025 Q4 electorate structure per SCB [A1] + Novus segmentation (<a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a>) [B2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swing-voter-identification">Swing-voter identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swing-voter-identification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swing-voter-identification">Swing-voter identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swing-voter-identification"></a></h3>
 <p>Two segments are pivotal for September:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Segment 3 (urban liberal professionals)</strong> — moved between L/C/M/S historically. SfU23 carve-out + AU15 ratification can lock in L vote; CU25 net neutral.</li>
 <li><strong>Segment 4 (suburban family voters)</strong> — swing between M/KD and S. CU25 + CU29 combination can reinforce M/KD cohesion; CU29 is a distributional test.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-activation-pathways">Activation pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-activation-pathways"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-activation-pathways">Activation pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-activation-pathways"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Tidö-favourable pathway</strong>: CU25 on-track + SfU23 carve-out operational + CU29 subsidy delivered → activation in segments 1, 4, with partial 3 — net + 1.5 to + 3 pp.</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition-favourable pathway</strong>: CU25 slip + SfU23 legal cascade + welfare-priority inversion framing effective → activation in segments 2, 5, 6 — net + 1 to + 2 pp opposition.</li>
 <li><strong>Institutional-independence pathway</strong>: FiU23 recapitalisation becomes central debate → activation in segments 3, 5 — ambiguous net effect; depends on framing.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-diagram">Segment diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-diagram">Segment diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
     Cluster --> S1[Law-and-order 18%]
@@ -2926,18 +2926,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-diagram">Segment diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style O fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff
     style SW fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000
     style Sep fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-18">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-18">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-18"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>2025 Q4 SCB electorate structure (<a href="https://www.scb.se/">scb.se</a>) [A1]</li>
 <li>Novus/Sifo segmentation (<a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a>) [B2]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Outside-In analysis with Nordic + EU comparator set.
 <strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark (primary Nordic), Finland (primary Nordic), Norway (Nordic non-EU), Germany (EU large-state), Netherlands (EU mid-state).
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on ratification dates and formal regimes (A1); MEDIUM on implementation quality inferences (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-summary-table">Comparator summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-summary-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-summary-table">Comparator summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-summary-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3000,18 +3000,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-summary-table">Comparator summary table<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th align="center">ILO C190 ratified</th><th>Prison-capacity model</th><th>Central-bank recap precedent</th><th>Migration-research carve-out</th><th>EV home-charging regime</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (subject)</td><td align="center">Pending via <code>HD01AU15</code></td><td>CU25 capex expansion</td><td>FiU23 review — recap ordinance pending</td><td>SfU23 dual-track</td><td>CU29 expanded subsidy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">2022 (<a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>)</td><td>2021 reform — leased capacity + Kosovo pilot (<a href="https://www.justitsministeriet.dk/">justitsministeriet.dk</a>)</td><td>Nationalbanken equity reserved under statute (<a href="https://www.nationalbanken.dk/">nationalbanken.dk</a>)</td><td>PhD / researcher fast-track since 2020 (<a href="https://www.nyidanmark.dk/">nyidanmark.dk</a>)</td><td>Grøn Bolig / subsidised charging (<a href="https://ens.dk/">energistyrelsen.dk</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">2023 (<a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>)</td><td>2023 capacity-expansion bill (<a href="https://oikeusministerio.fi/">om.fi</a>)</td><td>Suomen Pankki statutory capital — Eurosystem framework</td><td>Researcher residence permit fast-track (<a href="https://migri.fi/">migri.fi</a>)</td><td>EV home-charging subsidy via ARA (<a href="https://www.ara.fi/">ara.fi</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">2023 (<a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>)</td><td>Kriminalomsorgen long-term plan (<a href="https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/">kriminalomsorgen.no</a>)</td><td>Norges Bank capital rules — Fund-law interaction</td><td>Researcher fast-track (<a href="https://www.udi.no/">udi.no</a>)</td><td>Enova support scheme (<a href="https://www.enova.no/">enova.no</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">2022 (<a href="https://www.bmas.de/">bmas.de</a>)</td><td>Federal-state co-investment on Justizvollzug</td><td>Bundesbank statutory framework (ECB)</td><td>Blaue Karte + research fast-track</td><td>KfW home-charging programme (<a href="https://www.kfw.de/">kfw.de</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">2023 (<a href="https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/">rijksoverheid.nl</a>)</td><td>Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen long-term capacity plan</td><td>DNB recap via statutory process (<a href="https://www.dnb.nl/">dnb.nl</a>)</td><td>Kennismigrant visa regime (<a href="https://ind.nl/">ind.nl</a>)</td><td>Subsidieregeling elektrische personenauto's (<a href="https://www.rvo.nl/">rvo.nl</a>)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-lessons">Outside-In lessons<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-lessons"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification">For <code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO ratification)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-lessons">Outside-In lessons<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-lessons"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification">For <code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO ratification)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden is among the later ratifiers — Denmark 2022, Finland/Norway/Netherlands 2023, Germany 2022. The late-ratification framing is quantitatively supported: of 5 Nordic/EU comparators, 4 ratified C190 before Sweden. Defence: Swedish legal compatibility review (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>) treated C190 as requiring transposition work in Diskrimineringslagen and Arbetsmiljölagen — a substantive rather than symbolic approach. [Source A1 ilo.org]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity">For <code>HD01CU25</code> (prison capacity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity">For <code>HD01CU25</code> (prison capacity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark's 2021 leased-capacity + Kosovo pilot is the most aggressive Nordic precedent; Finland's 2023 bill is closest in shape to CU25. Comparative risk signal: both neighbours faced procedural legal challenges before construction began — Sweden's planning-law carve-out pathway has to be evaluated against those experiences. [Source A2 om.fi / justitsministeriet.dk]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025">For <code>HD01FiU23</code> (Riksbank 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025">For <code>HD01FiU23</code> (Riksbank 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025"></a></h4>
 <p>The Nordic / Eurozone central-bank recap framework precedents — Nationalbanken (DK, statutory reserve), Norges Bank (NO, petroleum-fund interaction), Bundesbank/DNB (EU, Eurosystem framework) — show the <strong>procedural separation</strong> between annual review and recapitalisation as standard practice. FiU should sequence accordingly. [Source A1 riksbank.se + comparator central-bank sites]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research">For <code>HD01SfU23</code> (migration / research)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research">For <code>HD01SfU23</code> (migration / research)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands all operate researcher fast-tracks. Sweden's SfU23 carve-out brings it into parity. The abuse-prevention framing is the Swedish-specific differentiator — Denmark's NyiDanmark enforcement model is the closest analogue. [Source A2 nyidanmark.dk]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging">For <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV home-charging)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging">For <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV home-charging)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging"></a></h4>
 <p>Finland's ARA subsidy and Norway's Enova schemes are the most mature Nordic comparators; both show that take-up concentrates in detached-housing demographics without multi-dwelling provisions — the regressivity concern in R7 of <code>risk-assessment.md</code> is replicated internationally. [Source A2 enova.no / ara.fi]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-diagram">Comparator diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-diagram">Comparator diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     SE[Sweden 2026] --- DK[Denmark]
     SE --- FI[Finland]
@@ -3031,25 +3031,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-diagram">Comparator diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style DE fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style NL fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style ILO fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-19">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-19">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-19"></a></h3>
 <p>All ratification dates from ilo.org NORMLEX database [A1]; all comparator agencies cited above.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: historical-pattern analysis with ≥ 3 prior precedents; Admiralty-coded sources.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on causal analogies.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014">Parallel 1 — Pre-election committee-report clustering (2022, 2018, 2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014">Parallel 1 — Pre-election committee-report clustering (2022, 2018, 2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014"></a></h3>
 <p>Incumbent governments have historically front-loaded committee reports in the final spring before September elections. 2018 S+MP government tabled ≥ 5 signature committee reports in April-May; 2014 S-led opposition-constraining cluster in spring 2014; 2022 S government in April 2022. Base rate for pre-election cluster: ~ 80 % of incumbencies. [B2, riksdagen.se/kalender archives]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023">Parallel 2 — Kriminalvården capacity plans (2020, 2023)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023">Parallel 2 — Kriminalvården capacity plans (2020, 2023)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023"></a></h3>
 <p>Two prior capacity-expansion plans (2020, 2023) — both missed original timelines by ≥ 15 % within 18 months (<a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> annual reports) [A2]. This is the base-rate input to KJ-2's 55 % slippage posterior on CU25. The 2023 plan additionally triggered two Riksrevisionen follow-up reviews (<a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a>) [A2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020">Parallel 3 — Central-bank recapitalisation episodes (Sweden 2013, Denmark 2020)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020">Parallel 3 — Central-bank recapitalisation episodes (Sweden 2013, Denmark 2020)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden 2013 Riksbank profit-distribution reform occurred quietly without chamber debate — counter-example to our FiU23 recapitalisation-debate scenario, suggesting the ~ 45 % probability is in line with the base rate rather than above it. Denmark 2020 Nationalbanken statutory-reserve framework — closer parallel: the FiU comparator-reference point for a separate recap hearing. (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>, <a href="https://www.nationalbanken.dk/">nationalbanken.dk</a>) [A1].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021">Parallel 4 — Migration-permit abuse-prevention / carve-out pairing (2014, 2017, 2021)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021">Parallel 4 — Migration-permit abuse-prevention / carve-out pairing (2014, 2017, 2021)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021"></a></h3>
 <p>The pairing of tightening + specialist carve-out is a repeat pattern in Swedish migration legislation: 2014 S carve-out for IT/researchers; 2017 S-MP carve-out for doctoral candidates; 2021 S tightening with doctoral retention. [B2, riksdagen.se] SfU23 fits this pattern; risk that implementation ordinance narrows the carve-out in practice is empirically supported — 2014 carve-out was operationally narrowed within 12 months.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190">Parallel 5 — ILO convention ratification delays (C189, C183, C190)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190">Parallel 5 — ILO convention ratification delays (C189, C183, C190)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has a recurring pattern of ratifying ILO conventions several years after Nordic peers: C189 (domestic workers, 2011): Sweden 2019 vs DK 2014; C183 (maternity): Sweden 2020 vs DK 2013; C190 now 2026 vs DK 2022. Pattern is substantive-compatibility-review culture rather than neglect. [A1, ilo.org NORMLEX]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus">Parallel 6 — EV subsidy / distributive risk (2017 Elbilspremien, 2022 Klimatbonus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus">Parallel 6 — EV subsidy / distributive risk (2017 Elbilspremien, 2022 Klimatbonus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus"></a></h3>
 <p>Both prior EV-subsidy regimes were critiqued as regressive by Riksrevisionen and S/V/MP opposition. Both were eventually re-scoped with income / housing-type caps. CU29's regressivity risk is historically reliably materialised. [A2, riksrevisionen.se]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match">Mini-diagram of historical-parallel pattern match<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match">Mini-diagram of historical-parallel pattern match<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     P1[Pre-election clustering 2014, 2018, 2022] --> M1[2026-04-24 cluster]
     P2[Kriminalvården 2020, 2023 plans] --> M2[CU25 slippage risk]
@@ -3069,7 +3069,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match">Mini-diagram of hi
     style M4 fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
     style M5 fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style M6 fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-20">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-20">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-20"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/kalender</a> historical calendar archives [A1]</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> annual reports 2020-2024 [A2]</li>
@@ -3078,10 +3078,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-20">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href=
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: agency-capacity assessment + risk-adjusted implementation scoring.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2) on agency-mandate; MEDIUM (C3) on capacity forecasts.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite">Feasibility matrix (0-100 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite">Feasibility matrix (0-100 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3142,32 +3142,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite">Feasibility matrix (0-100 composi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th align="center">Agency capacity</th><th align="center">Budget allocation</th><th align="center">Legal complexity</th><th align="center">Political alignment</th><th align="center">Timeline realism</th><th align="center">Composite</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center"><strong>65</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center"><strong>63</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center"><strong>86</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO ratification</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center"><strong>80</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center"><strong>75</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical-path items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65">CU25 — Kriminalvården capacity expansion (composite 65)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical-path items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65">CU25 — Kriminalvården capacity expansion (composite 65)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary constraint</strong>: capacity-absorption of + 8 500 platser requires sustained recruitment and procurement. Historical base rate: 85 % of such plans slip ≥ 10 %. [A2, kriminalvarden.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary constraint</strong>: planning-law carve-out faces municipal-level legal challenges (2014–2023 base rate: 3–5 challenges per large capacity project).</li>
 <li><strong>Key milestone</strong>: Q2 2026 capacity-status report.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63">SfU23 — Migration/researchers (composite 63)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63">SfU23 — Migration/researchers (composite 63)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary constraint</strong>: Migrationsverket transformation programme — dependencies on Digg (<a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a>) [A2].</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary constraint</strong>: dual-track permit processing IT requires ordinance + system integration. Historical base rate: migration-system changes take 12–18 months to operationalise.</li>
 <li><strong>Key milestone</strong>: implementation ordinance (summer 2026) + Migrationsverket IT milestone (Q3 2026).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86">FiU23 — Riksbank 2025 review (composite 86)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86">FiU23 — Riksbank 2025 review (composite 86)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Standing review; no novel implementation workload. Recapitalisation decision (separate ordinance if needed) is the only contingent operational load.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80">AU15 — ILO ratification (composite 80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80">AU15 — ILO ratification (composite 80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Diskrimineringslagen + Arbetsmiljölagen transposition straightforward. DO + AV implementation guidance cycle (<a href="https://www.do.se/">do.se</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>) [A2].</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75">CU29 — EV home-charging (composite 75)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75">CU29 — EV home-charging (composite 75)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Energimyndigheten (<a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a>) + Boverket (<a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>) implementation [A2]. Subsidy-rollout mechanics well-understood; regressivity mitigation requires separate ordinance.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-stress-diagram">Feasibility-stress diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-stress-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-stress-diagram">Feasibility-stress diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-stress-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     I[Cluster items]
     I --> CU25F[CU25 composite 65]
@@ -3191,25 +3191,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-stress-diagram">Feasibility-stress diagram<a class="" ari
     style R3 fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style R4 fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style R5 fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-21">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-21">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-21"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>, <a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>, <a href="https://www.do.se/">do.se</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>, <a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a>, <a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a> [A2]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — Heuer methodology; Red-Team challenge.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — hypotheses test analytic robustness of the mainline reading.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster">H1 — Mainline: Coordinated pre-election signalling cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster">H1 — Mainline: Coordinated pre-election signalling cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster"></a></h4>
 <p>The five-report tabling is a deliberate Tidö composition to front-load delivery signals ahead of Sep 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence">H2 — Bureaucratic coincidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence">H2 — Bureaucratic coincidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The clustering is a mechanical consequence of the Riksdag calendar — betänkanden accumulate for chamber decision before summer recess; committee-chair scheduling is the driver, not strategic messaging.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3--defensive-scrambling">H3 — Defensive scrambling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--defensive-scrambling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3--defensive-scrambling">H3 — Defensive scrambling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--defensive-scrambling"></a></h4>
 <p>The cluster reflects Tidö anxiety about slipping delivery metrics; signature items are being rushed through committee to lock in a pre-election record before unfavourable data emerges.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement">H4 — Coalition-internal settlement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement">H4 — Coalition-internal settlement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement"></a></h4>
 <p>The composition is the output of intra-coalition horse-trading: SD got CU25 + SfU23 hard framing; L got SfU23 carve-out + AU15 ratification; M balances; KD neutralised on CU29 cost caution — each party gets enough to defend its vote.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Evidence mapped to consistency with each hypothesis (C = consistent, I = inconsistent, N = neutral, ? = ambiguous).</p>
 
 
@@ -3292,26 +3292,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <p><strong>Tally of inconsistent evidence</strong> (minimising is the ACH-preferred hypothesis): H1 = 1, H2 = 3, H3 = 1, H4 = 0.</p>
 <p><strong>Preferred hypothesis</strong>: H4 (coalition-internal settlement) shows zero inconsistencies but H1 (coordinated signalling) and H3 (defensive) are both well-supported. H1 and H4 are in fact <strong>compatible</strong> — strategic signalling and horse-trading are concurrent. H2 is weakest but cannot be dismissed because E4 + E6 support it.</p>
 <p><strong>Decision</strong>: present H1 as mainline, with explicit acknowledgement that H4 (horse-trading) is the likely intra-coalition mechanism. H3 is the <strong>downside scenario</strong> to monitor.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim we are most likely wrong about</strong>: the CU25 DIW of 85. Red team contends: (a) CU25 may be operationally blocked by local-council procedural challenges before construction starts, reducing actual impact despite high symbolic weight; (b) prior Kriminalvården capacity-plan misses (2020, 2023) suggest a base rate of under-delivery that should drag CU25's implementation-impact sub-score down; (c) if delivery is performative rather than operational, DIW may reflect attention-weight more than decision-weight.</p>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: the DIW 85 score already integrates a 75 on institutional weight (moderate, not maximal) reflecting operational uncertainty, and an electoral-salience 95 captures the symbolic weight separately. The sensitivity band 78–88 in <code>significance-scoring.md</code> is consistent with the Red-Team concerns. We retain the mainline estimate but log this as a <strong>Priority-1 audit item</strong> for the +60 d Kriminalvården Q2 report.</p>
 <p><strong>Second challenge</strong>: SfU23 may be overrated as a coalition-stress driver (DIW 80, coalition-stress 85). Red team: L may not actually defect because the researcher carve-out already accommodates its preference; the "SD–L tension" narrative may be media framing more than institutional reality. <strong>Response</strong>: carve-out acceptance depends on ministerial ordinance scope, which is TBD — residual tension real but conditional. Retain current scoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-hypothesis-log">Rejected hypothesis log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypothesis-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-hypothesis-log">Rejected hypothesis log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypothesis-log"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>H2 (bureaucratic coincidence)</strong>: retained as null hypothesis for methodology purposes only. Inconsistent with E1 (simultaneous signature + breadth mix) and E2 (three signature items > base rate).</li>
 <li><strong>Sub-hypothesis</strong>: "the cluster signals Tidö pivot away from S-type welfare agenda". Rejected — no evidence in tabled items supports a welfare pivot; AU15 is labour-protection and CU29 is distributive.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-22">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-22">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-22"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 [A1]</li>
 <li>regeringen.se communications trend [A2]</li>
 <li>Historical Riksdag calendar: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/kalender</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: 7-dimension classification from <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code>.
 <strong>Dimensions</strong>: (1) Policy domain, (2) Coalition alignment, (3) Salience, (4) Time-horizon, (5) Contestedness, (6) Institutional locus, (7) Classification (sensitivity).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3378,15 +3378,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th><code>dok_id</code></th><th>Policy domain</th><th>Coalition alignment</th><th align="center">Salience</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Contestedness</th><th>Institutional locus</th><th>Classification / retention</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td>Criminal justice / Housing &#x26; infrastructure (CU)</td><td>Tidö-led (M/KD/SD driving; L concurring)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Short–Medium (2026–2028 construction)</td><td>CONTESTED (S mixed; V/MP opposed on environmental shortcuts)</td><td>CU committee; Kriminalvården implementation</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 10 y; open access</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td>Migration / Research mobility (SfU)</td><td>Tidö-led (SD maximalist; L/M dual-track; KD pragmatic)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Short (implementation 2026–2027)</td><td>BIFURCATED (opposition supports researcher carve-out; opposes abuse-prevention broadness)</td><td>SfU committee; Migrationsverket + UHR implementation</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 10 y; open access</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01FiU23</code></td><td>Monetary / Institutional (FiU)</td><td>Cross-party (standing annual review)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Standing (annual)</td><td>MILD (V raises mandate questions; otherwise consensus)</td><td>FiU committee; Riksbank General Council</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 25 y; open access (monetary-policy sensitivity)</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td>Labour / International (AU)</td><td>Broad cross-party</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Medium (ratification + transposition 2026–2027)</td><td>LOW (symbolic consensus)</td><td>AU committee; Arbetsmiljöverket + Diskrimineringsombudsmannen</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 25 y; open access</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01CU29</code></td><td>Climate / Housing / Mobility (CU)</td><td>Broad (MP/C/L advocate; M/KD/SD concur; SD cost-caution)</td><td align="center">LOW–MEDIUM</td><td>Short (2026–2027 rollout)</td><td>LOW (consensus on direction, quibble on cost)</td><td>CU committee; Boverket + Energimyndigheten</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 10 y; open access</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing">Priority tiers (for publishing + downstream processing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing">Priority tiers (for publishing + downstream processing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>P0 (lead story)</strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code> — CU25 prison capacity.</li>
 <li><strong>P1 (secondary lead)</strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>P2 (breadth)</strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 <p>All five classified <strong>PUBLIC</strong> per Offentlighetsprincipen (Public Access to Information Act, Tryckfrihetsförordningen 2:1). No personal-data processing beyond named public officials in their public role — GDPR Art. 9 basis: 9(2)(e) publicly made + 9(2)(g) substantial public interest. Retention 10 y standard for legislative records; 25 y for monetary-policy and ILO-related records (constitutional / international treaty reference value).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-diagram">Classification diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-diagram">Classification diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph P0["P0 Lead"]
       CU25[HD01CU25&#x3C;br/>Prison capacity]
@@ -3412,36 +3412,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-diagram">Classification diagram<a class="" aria-hidden
     style Tidö fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Inst fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cons fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-23">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-23"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-23">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-23"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 (A1), all at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/%7B%7Bdok_id%7D%7D">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{{dok_id}}</a></li>
 <li>Tryckfrihetsförordningen 2 kap 1 § — <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/TF</a> (A1)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: map policy clusters, legislative chains, coordinated-activity patterns, and sibling-folder references across the five tabled reports.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on direct committee + legislative chains (A1); MEDIUM on cluster inference (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery">Cluster 1 — Law-and-order delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery">Cluster 1 — Law-and-order delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code> (prison capacity), with narrative tie to earlier 2024/25 criminal-justice legislation.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: CU25 descends from 2023 Tidöavtal priority on <code>straffrättslig reform + kapacitetsutbyggnad</code> (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/tidoavtalet</a> [A2]); connects forward to pending 2026 Q3 Kriminalvården capital-expenditure proposition.
 <strong>Coordinated activity</strong>: Pre-debate CU25 + SfU23 pairing in plenary is the documented pattern from prior Tidö sessions (2024 motsvarande cluster on criminal-justice + migration).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out">Cluster 2 — Migration enforcement + competitiveness carve-out<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out">Cluster 2 — Migration enforcement + competitiveness carve-out<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Descends from 2024 SfU permit-tightening legislation (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/voteringar</a> previous SfU votes [A1]); anchors forward to pending 2026 Migrationsverket budget (BP 2026/27).
 <strong>Sibling folders</strong>: <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> (migration-related pending propositions may intersect); <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/</code> (opposition motions on researcher mobility).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship">Cluster 3 — Monetary / institutional stewardship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship">Cluster 3 — Monetary / institutional stewardship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01FiU23</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Standing annual review per Sveriges Riksbankslag (2022:1568) (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/SFS</a> [A1]); FiU23 follows 2024/25 HD01FiU23 predecessor.
 <strong>Forward tie</strong>: 2026 Q2 Riksbank penningpolitisk rapport (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>); potential 2026 Q3 recapitalisation ordinance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance">Cluster 4 — International labour compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance">Cluster 4 — International labour compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Descends from Regeringens skrivelse on ILO ratifications (standing periodic cycle); forward-ties to 2026–27 Arbetsmiljöverket + Diskrimineringsombudsmannen guidance updates.
 <strong>Sibling activity</strong>: 2026-04-14 AU propositions on workplace-safety modernisation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition">Cluster 5 — Climate-mobility transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition">Cluster 5 — Climate-mobility transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01CU29</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Descends from Klimatpolitiska handlingsplanen 2023–24 commitments (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/klimatpolitiska-handlingsplanen</a> [A2]); forward-ties to Boverket charging-infrastructure BBR updates.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix">Cross-cluster coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix">Cross-cluster coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3496,7 +3496,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix">Cross-cluster coordination matrix<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th align="center">CU25</th><th align="center">SfU23</th><th align="center">FiU23</th><th align="center">AU15</th><th align="center">CU29</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CU25</strong></td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">Shared Tidö signal day; joint floor debate likely</td><td align="center">Indirect (fiscal envelope linkage)</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">Indirect (CU committee shared)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SfU23</strong></td><td align="center">Joint floor debate likely</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">Indirect (MV budget linkage)</td><td align="center">Indirect (labour-mobility angle)</td><td align="center">None</td></tr><tr><td><strong>FiU23</strong></td><td align="center">Indirect (fiscal)</td><td align="center">Indirect (MV budget)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">None</td></tr><tr><td><strong>AU15</strong></td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">Labour-mobility overlap</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">None</td></tr><tr><td><strong>CU29</strong></td><td align="center">CU committee shared</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains-diagram">Legislative chains diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains-diagram">Legislative chains diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     T[Tidöavtal 2022] --> P23[2023 CJ priorities]
     P23 --> CU25[HD01CU25]
@@ -3520,20 +3520,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chains-diagram">Legislative chains diagram<a class="" ari
     style RecapOrd fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style AVGuid fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style BBR fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-cross-references">Sibling-folder cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-cross-references">Sibling-folder cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/</code> — predecessor committee-report cluster; compare DIW ranking drift.</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/</code> — opposition motions that may cross-reference CU25 / SfU23 via amendment text.</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/</code> — proposition source material for CU25 / SfU23 (if applicable).</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/monthly-review/</code> — monthly frame anchoring, for comparative positioning.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-24">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-24">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-24"></a></h3>
 <p>All cluster references cite <code>dok_id</code> + primary URL on data.riksdagen.se, regeringen.se, riksbank.se, or riksdagen.se/SFS (constitutional text).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: run-audit gate per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Methodology Reflection</code>.
 <strong>Standards audited</strong>: ICD 203 (9 analytic standards), Admiralty Code, WEP/Kent confidence, OSINT tradecraft ethics, DIW weighting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-1-evidence-sufficiency">1. Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-evidence-sufficiency">1. Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 5 attested <code>dok_id</code> sourced via <code>get_dokument</code> (A1).</li>
 <li>Implementing agency coverage: Kriminalvården, Migrationsverket, Riksbank, Arbetsmiljöverket, DO, Boverket, Energimyndigheten — all with primary-source URLs (A1–A2).</li>
@@ -3541,7 +3541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-evidence-sufficiency">1. Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidde
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: full text of the 5 reports not fetched in this run (titles + metadata only). Mitigated by committee-calendar and Tidöavtal trajectory knowledge; flagged as limitation.</li>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: current polling data not integrated. Mitigated by structural analysis; flagged as PIR-6 + PIR-7 for cross-session-intelligence in next aggregation cycle.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-2-confidence-distribution">2. Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-confidence-distribution">2. Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3579,7 +3579,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-confidence-distribution">2. Confidence distribution<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Level</th><th align="center">Count</th><th align="center">Share</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0 %</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">57 %</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">43 %</td></tr><tr><td>LOW</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0 %</td></tr><tr><td>VERY LOW</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0 %</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>HIGH:MEDIUM ratio (4:3) is calibrated — absence of VERY HIGH reflects that no judgments are derived from settled ground truth (election has not happened; Q2 reports not yet published). Absence of LOW reflects that judgments for which we lacked evidence were instead flagged as <strong>assumptions</strong> in §Key Assumptions Check (A1–A5), not promoted to judgments.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-3-source-diversity">3. Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-source-diversity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-source-diversity">3. Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-source-diversity"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Parliamentary primary</strong>: data.riksdagen.se, riksdagen.se (A1)</li>
 <li><strong>Government primary</strong>: regeringen.se (A2)</li>
@@ -3589,7 +3589,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-source-diversity">3. Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Comparator primary</strong>: justitsministeriet.dk, om.fi, kriminalomsorgen.no, bmas.de, rijksoverheid.nl and central-bank sites (A1–A2)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Diversity satisfies <strong>Source Diversity Rule</strong>: every P0/P1 claim (KJ-1, KJ-2, KJ-3, KJ-4, KJ-7) cites ≥ 3 independent sources across categories.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic">4. Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic">4. Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT + stakeholder + scenario analysis applied evenly across parties:</p>
 
 
@@ -3652,7 +3652,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic">4. Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Positive references</th><th align="center">Negative references</th><th align="center">Net</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+3</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">−1</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+1</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">−1</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+1</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Variance is ≤ ±3 for all parties — within neutrality tolerance (tolerance threshold: ≤ ±5 per <code>political-style-guide.md</code>). No party exceeds ±5. SD's mildly negative score reflects its own hardline positions on CU25 / SfU23 being flagged as coalition-stress factors, not analyst bias.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-5-icd-203-audit">5. ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-icd-203-audit">5. ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3710,7 +3710,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-icd-203-audit">5. ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 standard</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Describes quality and reliability of underlying sources</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Admiralty codes on every evidence row</td></tr><tr><td>2. Properly caveats and expresses uncertainties</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Confidence labels on all KJs + §Key Assumptions Check</td></tr><tr><td>3. Properly distinguishes analyst judgments from facts</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"We assess…" language vs. source-cited facts</td></tr><tr><td>4. Incorporates alternative analyses (ACH/Red Team)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>devils-advocate.md</code> H1–H4 + Red Team</td></tr><tr><td>5. Demonstrates customer relevance</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>§"3 Decisions This Brief Supports" in <code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>6. Uses clear and logical argumentation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Mainline → evidence → confidence structure</td></tr><tr><td>7. Explains change to or consistency of judgments</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Anchored against 2024/25 SfU tightening trajectory + 2022 Tidöavtal</td></tr><tr><td>8. Makes accurate judgments and assessments</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>Will be audited at +60 d Kriminalvården report (PIR-1)</td></tr><tr><td>9. Incorporates visualisations where appropriate</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>12+ Mermaid diagrams across artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Standard 8 is retrospective — marked as action item in §Methodology Improvements.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-sat-technique-attestation">6. SAT technique attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-sat-technique-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-sat-technique-attestation">6. SAT technique attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-sat-technique-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>Structured Analytic Techniques used in this run:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</strong> — <code>devils-advocate.md</code> §ACH matrix</li>
@@ -3726,7 +3726,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-sat-technique-attestation">6. SAT technique attestation<a class=""
 <li><strong>PESTLE-adjacent 5-dimension risk register</strong> — <code>risk-assessment.md</code></li>
 </ol>
 <p>11 distinct SATs applied; meets the ≥ 10 threshold in <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance">7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance">7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All data from Offentlighetsprincipen / public-data MCPs.</li>
 <li>Named actors are public officials or party groups in their public capacity. No private personal data.</li>
@@ -3734,7 +3734,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance">7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance<a
 <li>No voter-level or psychographic inference beyond aggregate party positioning.</li>
 <li>No third-party data sources; no scraping; no leaked/hacked material.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">8. Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">8. Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Pre-fetch full text</strong> for at least the P0 and P1 committee reports (<code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>) by using <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code> in the download pipeline. This will let per-document analyses cite specific paragraphs rather than inferring from titles.</li>
 <li><strong>Integrate Riksdag voting history on predecessor items</strong> via <code>get_voteringar</code> — e.g. pull the prior year's corresponding bet votes to quantify coalition-stress baseline for KJ-3. Add a <code>prior-votes-context.json</code> enrichment step.</li>
@@ -3742,17 +3742,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">8. Methodology Improvement
 <li><strong>Test H3 (defensive scrambling) hypothesis explicitly</strong> at +60 d by comparing the Kriminalvården Q2 capacity figure against the CU25 implied baseline. If deviation ≥ 10 %, update hypothesis weighting.</li>
 <li><strong>Add comparator-side prison-capacity and migration-permit metrics</strong> as structured JSON (<code>comparator-metrics.json</code>) so future Outside-In analyses can quantitatively compare rather than narratively compare.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-9-limitations">9. Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-limitations">9. Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text of committee reports not fetched this run (title + metadata only).</li>
 <li>Polling data not integrated (relies on published 2025 Q4 / 2026 Q1 baselines).</li>
 <li>Implementation-agency status reports for Q1 2026 not all available yet; some inference on capacity trajectory.</li>
 <li>Comparative analysis depth varies by comparator (DK / FI deepest; DE / NL lighter).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-25">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-25">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-25"></a></h3>
 <p>This reflection cites: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>, <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code>, <code>political-style-guide.md</code>, and all 15 other artifacts in this folder.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-24 01:06 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_betankanden, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 50
@@ -3766,7 +3766,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -3776,9 +3776,40 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-23 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3833,7 +3864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:11.059Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:32.538Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html b/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html
index 73a9a55f44..e97170d2ce 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.268Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.814Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.268Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:32.814Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö","description":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's three pre-election signature pillars — criminal-justice capacity (HD01CU25), migration enforcement with a research-mobility…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:11.268Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01au15.json","name":"documents/hd01au15.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu25.json","name":"documents/hd01cu25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu29.json","name":"documents/hd01cu29.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu23.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01sfu23.json","name":"documents/hd01sfu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö","description":"Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's three pre-election signature pillars — criminal-justice capacity (HD01CU25), migration enforcement with a research-mobility…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:32.814Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-committeeReports-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01au15.json","name":"documents/hd01au15.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu25.json","name":"documents/hd01cu25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01cu29.json","name":"documents/hd01cu29.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01fiu23.json","name":"documents/hd01fiu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/hd01sfu23.json","name":"documents/hd01sfu23.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Five committee reports tabled 2026-04-23 cluster along the Tidö coalition's three pre-election signature pillars — <strong>criminal-justice capacity</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>), <strong>migration enforcement with a research-mobility carve-out</strong> (<code>HD01SfU23</code>), and <strong>monetary-institutional stewardship</strong> (<code>HD01FiU23</code>) — supplemented by two broad-consensus dossiers on <strong>ILO labour-rights ratification</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code>) and <strong>EV home-charging</strong> (<code>HD01CU29</code>). The cluster is a deliberate signalling composition ~5 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election: it lets M/KD/SD claim delivery on law-and-order and migration while L and centrist actors anchor EU-compatible labour and climate wins. Real implementation risk concentrates in <code>HD01CU25</code> (Kriminalvården capacity absorption) and <code>HD01SfU23</code> (Migrationsverket case-handling bifurcation); reputational risk concentrates in <code>HD01FiU23</code> (Riksbank balance-sheet losses and independence narratives).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Election-cycle messaging</strong> — Government communicators should sequence CU25 (law-and-order) + SfU23 (migration) floor speeches together during May 2026 to maximise pre-recess coverage; opposition should counter-frame SfU23 on researcher-mobility carve-out to split M from L and avoid S being boxed in as anti-research.</li>
 <li><strong>Implementation oversight</strong> — KU and Riksrevisionen should pre-flag CU25 (procurement/environmental shortcut exposure) and SfU23 (Migrationsverket dual-track IT and staffing) for 2026/27 audit scope; FiU23 confirms standing Riksbank independence review cadence.</li>
 <li><strong>International positioning</strong> — Ratification of ILO C190 (AU15) should be paired in government talking points with EU Platform Work Directive transposition and Nordic counterparts' earlier ratifications (Denmark, Finland, Norway) to maximise reputational dividend.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lead story</strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code> — the prison-capacity expansion bill is the highest-weighted item (DIW 85) because it combines large fiscal exposure (Kriminalvården expansion programme), compressed timelines, and pre-election symbolism. See <code>synthesis-summary.md</code> and <code>risk-assessment.md §Institutional</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Second line</strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code> (DIW 80) bifurcates migration policy — tightening on study permits while opening for researchers — creating both coalition-internal tension (SD–L) and an Opposition opening on competitiveness framing. See <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code> and <code>devils-advocate.md H3</code>.</li>
@@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>Consensus items</strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO, DIW 72) and <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV charging, DIW 58) are broad-support dossiers that provide bipartisan cover for the government to claim delivery width.</li>
 <li><strong>Top forward trigger</strong>: watch the <strong>Kriminalvården 2026 Q2 capacity status report</strong> (expected +60 days, ~2026-06-23). A deviation ≥ 10 % from planned bed count would falsify the CU25 timeline and invert the government's crime-delivery narrative into the election. See <code>forward-indicators.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence--assumptions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--assumptions"></a></h3>
 <p>Key Judgments carry <strong>HIGH</strong> confidence on cluster composition and DIW ranking (based on primary <code>get_dokument</code> metadata, consistent with Riksdag committee calendar). <strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence on implementation deltas (dependent on 2026 Q2 status reports not yet published). <strong>LOW</strong> confidence on voter-level framing effects pending 2026 Q3 polling waves. See <code>intelligence-assessment.md §Key Assumptions Check</code> and <code>methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 audit</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--composition-diagram">📊 Composition diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--composition-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-composition-diagram">📊 Composition diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-composition-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     A[CU25 Prison capacity&#x3C;br/>DIW 85] --> G[Tidö pre-election&#x3C;br/>signature cluster]
     B[SfU23 Migration/&#x3C;br/>Researchers DIW 80] --> G
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--composition-diagram">📊 Composition diagram<a class="" aria-hidden
     style J fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style K fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style L fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD01CU25"})</code> → <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><code>get_dokument({dok_id: "HD01SfU23"})</code> → <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a> [A1]</li>
@@ -269,10 +269,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <li>See <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> for full judgement-level source mapping.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story--decision">Lead story / decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story--decision"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story--decision">Lead story / decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story--decision"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant signal in today's five-report cluster is a <strong>cross-committee signalling composition</strong> rather than any single blockbuster bill. The Tidö coalition (M, KD, L, SD supply) has staged its two politically hottest pillars — <strong>prison-capacity expansion</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>) and <strong>migration tightening with a research carve-out</strong> (<code>HD01SfU23</code>) — alongside an <strong>institutional-stewardship</strong> report (<code>HD01FiU23</code>, Riksbank 2025) and two <strong>consensus dossiers</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code> ILO, <code>HD01CU29</code> EV charging) that provide breadth cover. This pattern — concentrating signature items in a single tabling window ~5 months before the <strong>September 2026 Riksdag election</strong> (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/sa-fungerar-riksdagen/riksdagens-uppgifter/val/">riksdagen.se election calendar</a> [A1]) — is strategically rational for the government but creates <strong>three concentrated implementation risks</strong> (CU25 procurement, SfU23 Migrationsverket IT, FiU23 balance-sheet narrative) that any of them materialising would damage delivery credibility simultaneously.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     R1["1. HD01CU25 — Prison capacity (DIW 85)&#x3C;br/>[riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25]"]
     R2["2. HD01SfU23 — Migration research (DIW 80)&#x3C;br/>[riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23]"]
@@ -286,50 +286,50 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style R4 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style R5 fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff</pre>
 <p>See <code>significance-scoring.md</code> for per-item DIW decomposition.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23">1. Pre-election signalling cluster (CU25 + SfU23 + FiU23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23">1. Pre-election signalling cluster (CU25 + SfU23 + FiU23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-pre-election-signalling-cluster-cu25--sfu23--fiu23"></a></h4>
 <p>The three high-DIW items (CU25, SfU23, FiU23 — <code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>) are <strong>not coincidentally tabled together</strong>. The Civilutskottet CU channel is being used unusually heavily for penal policy (CU25) alongside its standard housing/family-law remit, reflecting the government's decision to route capacity-expansion legislation through CU rather than JuU to accelerate planning-law carve-outs. SfU23 follows the 2024–25 migration tightening trajectory (see <code>historical-parallels.md §2024-SfU trajectory</code>) while opening a researcher carve-out that L and C can defend. FiU23 is the annual Riksbank review (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/utskott/finansutskottet</a> [A1]), unusually salient in 2026 because the Riksbank booked balance-sheet losses in 2023–24 that the recapitalisation statute addresses.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29">2. Consensus-breadth cluster (AU15 + CU29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29">2. Consensus-breadth cluster (AU15 + CU29)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-consensus-breadth-cluster-au15--cu29"></a></h4>
 <p><code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO C190 on workplace violence/harassment + C155/C187 occupational safety) and <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV home-charging) serve as <strong>narrative-breadth</strong> items. AU15 signals EU-compatible, ILO-aligned labour rights (Denmark ratified C190 in 2022, Finland 2023, Norway 2023 — see <code>comparative-international.md</code>); CU29 signals climate-mobility delivery. Both are expected to attract broad-party support and give the government cover to claim width on workers' rights and climate alongside the harder CU25/SfU23 signals.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions">3. Coalition-internal tensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions">3. Coalition-internal tensions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-coalition-internal-tensions"></a></h4>
 <p>SfU23 is the most likely intra-coalition friction point: SD will push maximalist framing on permit-abuse; L will defend researcher mobility; M/KD balance. CU25 will see S split — labour-union tradition vs. law-and-order triangulation — with V/MP opposing on environmental-carve-out grounds. FiU23 will see V/MP raise Riksbank mandate/ESG questions while M/L defend independence. See <code>devils-advocate.md §H2</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff">4. Post-election implementation cliff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff">4. Post-election implementation cliff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-post-election-implementation-cliff"></a></h4>
 <p>All five items will clear chamber in 2026 before dissolution, but <strong>execution lands with whichever government forms after September 2026</strong>. CU25's Kriminalvården capacity timeline extends into 2027–2030 (see <code>forward-indicators.md</code>); SfU23's Migrationsverket IT build extends into 2027. A government transition ↔ delivery handover mismatch is the cluster's single largest cascading risk. See <code>risk-assessment.md §Institutional</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Suggested headline (EN)</strong>: "Riksdag Committee Reports Stack Tidö Pre-Election Pillars: Prisons, Migration, Riksbank"</li>
 <li><strong>Suggested headline (SV)</strong>: "Tidöpartierna staplar sina valsignaler: fängelser, migration och Riksbank i utskottsvågen"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description</strong>: "Five committee reports tabled 23 April cluster Tidö's law-and-order, migration and monetary-stewardship signals five months before the September 2026 election."</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> calls on HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29 [A1]</li>
 <li>riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/ [A1]</li>
 <li>regeringen.se — Tidöavtalet reference context [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling   <strong>Audience</strong>: analyst-desk, newsroom, KU oversight interests.
 <strong>Standards</strong>: ICD 203 (analytic standards); WEP / Kent confidence scale; Admiralty Code on all source citations.
 <strong>Base date</strong>: 2026-04-24.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Tidö has staged its pre-election committee-report cluster with three signature items (CU25 prison capacity, SfU23 migration/researchers, FiU23 Riksbank 2025) and two consensus items (AU15 ILO, CU29 EV charging). Delivery credibility over the next 60–120 days — dominated by the Kriminalvården Q2 capacity report and Migrationsverket dual-track IT milestone — will determine whether this cluster becomes a 2026 campaign asset (~40 % likelihood) or a narrative liability (~40 % combined S2 + S3 likelihood).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2">KJ-1 — The five-report cluster is strategically composed, not calendar-driven (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2">KJ-1 — The five-report cluster is strategically composed, not calendar-driven (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--the-five-report-cluster-is-strategically-composed-not-calendar-driven-high-confidence-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>We assess with <strong>HIGH</strong> confidence that the composition reflects coordinated signalling and coalition-internal horse-trading (H1 + H4 in <code>devils-advocate.md</code>). Evidence: simultaneous tabling across 4 committees with 3 signature items; coalition-internal balance visible in SfU23 carve-out structure; Tidö April 2026 delivery-ledger communications pattern. Analytic technique: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — 1 inconsistency against mainline H1, 0 against H4. Confidence rated HIGH because coordination is structurally visible; the residual 20 % accounts for partial contribution from calendar mechanics (H2). Primary source: <code>get_dokument</code> × 5 [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2">KJ-2 — CU25 (prison capacity) is the single highest-weight item and highest-risk delivery exposure (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2">KJ-2 — CU25 (prison capacity) is the single highest-weight item and highest-risk delivery exposure (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, B2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--cu25-prison-capacity-is-the-single-highest-weight-item-and-highest-risk-delivery-exposure-high-confidence-b2"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 85 (bounded 78–88) reflects convergence of electoral salience (95), fiscal/regulatory impact (90), and precedent value (80 — planning-law carve-outs). Implementation risk concentrates on Kriminalvården capacity absorption and procurement; probability of ≥ 10 % timeline slippage at 55 % posterior (Bayesian update from 2020/2023 capacity-plan miss base rate). Primary source: <code>HD01CU25</code> + <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-3 — SfU23 is the single most coalition-internally stressed item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-3 — SfU23 is the single most coalition-internally stressed item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--sfu23-is-the-single-most-coalition-internally-stressed-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 80 with coalition-stress sub-score 85 — the highest on the cluster table. Tension is between SD maximalist framing of abuse-prevention and L defence of researcher carve-out; M/KD balance. We assess <strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence that visible L position-paper defence will emerge pre-summer recess; L defection on floor vote is <strong>LOW</strong> (&#x3C; 20 %) because carve-out structure accommodates L preference. Primary source: <code>HD01SfU23</code> + L party published positions [B3].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2">KJ-4 — FiU23 (Riksbank 2025) is standing annual review but unusually salient given 2024–25 balance-sheet narrative (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2">KJ-4 — FiU23 (Riksbank 2025) is standing annual review but unusually salient given 2024–25 balance-sheet narrative (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--fiu23-riksbank-2025-is-standing-annual-review-but-unusually-salient-given-202425-balance-sheet-narrative-high-confidence-a2"></a></h4>
 <p>Probability (~ 45 %) that Riksbank recapitalisation becomes a 2026 chamber-floor debate rather than a contained standing-review item. Indicator: FiU scheduling a separate recapitalisation hearing. Primary source: <code>HD01FiU23</code> + <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> annual reports [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-5 — AU15 + CU29 function as breadth cover, producing low-probability but non-trivial reputational dividend potential (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-5 — AU15 + CU29 function as breadth cover, producing low-probability but non-trivial reputational dividend potential (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--au15--cu29-function-as-breadth-cover-producing-low-probability-but-non-trivial-reputational-dividend-potential-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h4>
 <p>Scenario 5 ("broad-consensus windfall") sits at 8 %. Principal mechanism: pairing C190 ratification with EU Platform Work Directive transposition for Nordic / EU media. Primary source: <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> + ILO ratification dates [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-6 — The cluster's cascading-risk exposure is larger than any single item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3">KJ-6 — The cluster's cascading-risk exposure is larger than any single item (<strong>MEDIUM</strong> confidence, C3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--the-clusters-cascading-risk-exposure-is-larger-than-any-single-item-medium-confidence-c3"></a></h4>
 <p>Joint probability of ≥ 1 delivery failure (R1, R3, R5, R10 in <code>risk-assessment.md</code>) within Q3 2026 is ~ 70 %; joint probability of ≥ 2 is ~ 40 %. A combined CU25 timeline slip + SfU23 judicial/IT cascade + FiU23 recapitalisation debate is the low-probability (&#x3C; 10 %) but high-impact worst case. Primary source: Bayesian update on 2022–24 base rates [B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1">KJ-7 — Sweden's late ratification of ILO C190 is framing-rather-than-substance disadvantage (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1">KJ-7 — Sweden's late ratification of ILO C190 is framing-rather-than-substance disadvantage (<strong>HIGH</strong> confidence, A1)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--swedens-late-ratification-of-ilo-c190-is-framing-rather-than-substance-disadvantage-high-confidence-a1"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark (2022), Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands ratified before Sweden. Substantive reason: legal compatibility work in Diskrimineringslagen + Arbetsmiljölagen. <code>HD01AU15</code> completes Nordic parity with a measurable lag that opposition actors may frame as stewardship deficit. Primary source: <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org NORMLEX</a> [A1].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Assumption</th><th>Source</th><th>If wrong</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">A1</td><td>Sep 2026 election remains on schedule</td><td><a href="https://www.val.se/">valmyndigheten.se</a></td><td>Early election would compress implementation timelines</td><td>Re-run scenarios on altered horizon</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A2</td><td>Riksbank 2024–25 balance-sheet trajectory holds</td><td><a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a></td><td>Recovery would reduce FiU23 salience</td><td>Re-weight KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A3</td><td>No major Migrationsöverdomstolen ruling pre-tabling</td><td><a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a></td><td>Ruling would alter SfU23 context</td><td>Re-run KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A4</td><td>Kriminalvården 2026 capacity plan remains as published</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a></td><td>Revised plan invalidates CU25 baseline</td><td>Re-run KJ-2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">A5</td><td>No EU directive change altering AU15 ratification landscape</td><td><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/">eur-lex.europa.eu</a></td><td>EU change would re-frame KJ-7</td><td>Re-run comparative analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong> (CU25): Kriminalvården Q2 2026 capacity status — target date ~ 2026-06-23; detection: report publication at <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong> (SfU23): any Migrationsöverdomstolen prövningstillstånd on SfU23 test case — rolling; detection: <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> press releases.</li>
@@ -388,20 +388,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Inte
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong> (CU25 politics): L party position-paper releases on CU25 / SfU23 — detection: <a href="https://www.liberalerna.se/">liberalerna.se</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong> (standing): any disinformation / narrative-amplification surge around CU25 slippage or SfU23 abuse framing — detection: <a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a> disinformation observatory.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH / VERY HIGH</strong>: KJ-1, KJ-2, KJ-4, KJ-7 (4 judgments)</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM</strong>: KJ-3, KJ-5, KJ-6 (3 judgments)</li>
 <li><strong>LOW</strong>: none</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Ratio HIGH:MEDIUM:LOW = 4:3:0. Absence of LOW judgments is consistent with a high-information base (5 attested <code>dok_id</code> + well-documented implementing agencies) and consistent with ICD 203 discipline on confidence-to-evidence mapping — see <code>methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 audit</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h3>
 <p>All key judgments cite at least one <code>get_dokument</code> call + one primary-source URL on data.riksdagen.se / regeringen.se / riksbank.se / ilo.org / kriminalvarden.se / migrationsverket.se / domstol.se.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: Decision-Impact Weighting (DIW) from <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §DIW</code>.
 <strong>Components</strong> (0–100 each, weighted): Stakeholder reach (20 %), Fiscal/regulatory impact (20 %), Institutional change (15 %), Electoral salience (15 %), Precedent value (10 %), Time-criticality (10 %), Coalition stress (10 %).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-table">Ranking table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-table">Ranking table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-table">Ranking table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th><code>dok_id</code></th><th align="center">Committee</th><th align="center">Stake</th><th align="center">Fiscal</th><th align="center">Inst</th><th align="center">Elect</th><th align="center">Prec</th><th align="center">Time</th><th align="center">Coal</th><th align="center"><strong>DIW</strong></th><th>Tier</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">95</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center"><strong>85</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">SfU</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center"><strong>80</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code></td><td align="center">FiU</td><td align="center">95</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center"><strong>78</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td align="center">AU</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center"><strong>72</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code></td><td align="center">CU</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">50</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center"><strong>58</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a> [A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-diagram">Ranking diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-diagram">Ranking diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph Priority_L2plus["L2+ Priority HD01CU25 HD01SfU23 HD01FiU23"]
       A[HD01CU25 85&#x3C;br/>Prison capacity]
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-diagram">Ranking diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style C fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style D fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style E fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CU25 → 85</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>): bounded 78–88. If Kriminalvården publishes its Q2 2026 capacity report confirming on-track delivery (see <code>forward-indicators.md</code> +60d trigger), electoral salience stays at 95; if status slips, institutional weight rises and DIW trends to 88. Source: <code>HD01CU25</code> at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a> [A1].</li>
 <li><strong>SfU23 → 80</strong>: bounded 74–84. Coalition-stress sub-score (85) is the single highest on the table because SD–L friction is the modal public dispute pattern; a visible L defection (or pre-election L position-paper on research mobility) pushes DIW to 84. Source: party communications <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> [A1].</li>
@@ -523,14 +523,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>AU15 → 72</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code>): bounded 68–75. Stable. Precedent value (85) dominates because C190 ratification anchors future gender-equality and harassment litigation framework in Swedish labour-market model. Source: <code>HD01AU15</code> at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a> [A1].</li>
 <li><strong>CU29 → 58</strong>: bounded 52–62. Stable consensus item. Precedent value (55) is only moderate because home-charging regulation is incremental against the existing electricity and property legislation. Source: <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/infrastrukturdepartementet</a> [A2].</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-assignment">Priority tier assignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-assignment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-assignment">Priority tier assignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-assignment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>L2+ Priority</strong> (<code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>): depth-tier L2+ per-document analysis, chart data file, stakeholder network. <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a></li>
 <li><strong>L2 Strategic</strong> (<code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>): standard L2 per-document analysis. <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-completeness">Evidence completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-completeness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-completeness">Evidence completeness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-completeness"></a></h3>
 <p>All 5 rows cite a live <code>dok_id</code> resolvable via <code>get_dokument</code> + a primary-source URL on <code>data.riksdagen.se</code>. All auxiliary claims cite Kriminalvården, Riksbank, ILO, Regeringen primary URLs.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 (<code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>) at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> committee calendar (A1)</li>
@@ -539,10 +539,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> — ILO C190 / C155 / C187 citations for <code>HD01AU15</code> (A1)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: narrative-ecosystem analysis per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> §Strategic Communication.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on framing uptake.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-likely-outlet-level-framings">Likely outlet-level framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-outlet-level-framings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-likely-outlet-level-framings">Likely outlet-level framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-outlet-level-framings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-likely-outlet-level-framings">Likely outlet-level framings<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>CU25</th><th>SfU23</th><th>FiU23</th><th>AU15</th><th>CU29</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dagens Nyheter</strong></td><td>Delivery + procurement-risk focus</td><td>Proportionality + carve-out clarity focus</td><td>Institutional-independence focus</td><td>Late-ratification framing</td><td>Regressivity critique</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Svenska Dagbladet</strong></td><td>Tidö delivery-ledger positive</td><td>Carve-out competitiveness positive</td><td>Standing review, low-salience</td><td>Consensus positive</td><td>Cautious-positive</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Aftonbladet (LED)</strong></td><td>Welfare-vs-prisons inversion critique</td><td>Abuse-framing critique + humanitarian</td><td>Recap-debate welfare-impact</td><td>Ratification positive</td><td>Climate-transition positive with equity caveat</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Expressen (LED)</strong></td><td>Delivery-ledger positive-sceptical</td><td>Abuse-prevention positive with carve-out caveats</td><td>Neutral standing review</td><td>Positive</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SVT Nyheter</strong></td><td>Balanced delivery + risk</td><td>Balanced tightening + carve-out</td><td>Institutional-review explainer</td><td>Positive ratification</td><td>Balanced regressivity discussion</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sveriges Radio Ekot</strong></td><td>Procedural + delivery detail</td><td>Institutional-balance focus</td><td>Central-bank governance</td><td>Positive</td><td>Distributive discussion</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor">Narrative lines to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor">Narrative lines to monitor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>"Fängelser före välfärd"</strong> (prisons before welfare) — S/V/MP-aligned inversion of Tidö delivery claim (CU25 focus).</li>
 <li><strong>"Konkurrenskraft vs. kontroll"</strong> (competitiveness vs. control) — L/C/business-oriented critique of SfU23 balance.</li>
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-lines-to-monitor">Narrative lines to monitor<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>"Sverige sist i Norden"</strong> (Sweden last in the Nordics) — opposition re-framing of AU15 delay.</li>
 <li><strong>"Elbil åt de redan rika"</strong> (EVs for those already wealthy) — V/MP/C distributive critique of CU29.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment">Disinformation vulnerability assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment">Disinformation vulnerability assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-disinformation-vulnerability-assessment">Disinformation vulnerability
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Vulnerability</th><th>Amplification vectors</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CU25</td><td>HIGH — capacity-data distortion, procurement-scandal amplification</td><td>Telegram, TikTok, Gab</td><td>Monitor MSB observatory (<a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a>) [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>SfU23</td><td>HIGH — abuse-narrative amplification</td><td>X/Twitter, Telegram</td><td>Monitor MSB + Migrationsverket press (<a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>) [A2]</td></tr><tr><td>FiU23</td><td>MEDIUM — central-bank crisis memes</td><td>Finance-Twitter, niche blogs</td><td>Riksbank communications (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>) [A1]</td></tr><tr><td>AU15</td><td>LOW</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>CU29</td><td>MEDIUM — regressivity meme amplification</td><td>X/Twitter</td><td><a href="https://www.naturvardsverket.se/">naturvardsverket.se</a> + <a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a> data clarity [A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-propagation-diagram">Framing-propagation diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-propagation-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-propagation-diagram">Framing-propagation diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-propagation-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     C[Cluster 2026-04-24]
     C --> Gov[Regeringskansliet framing]
@@ -679,17 +679,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-propagation-diagram">Framing-propagation diagram<a class="" a
     style Alt fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style Dis fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
     style Pub fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-4">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 <li>Regeringskansliet communications trend (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>) [A2]</li>
 <li>MSB disinformation observatory (<a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a>) [A2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens matrix from <code>analysis/methodologies/synthesis-methodology.md</code> — (1) Parties, (2) Government agencies, (3) Affected citizens / demographic groups, (4) Civil society / unions / employers, (5) Subnational government, (6) International / EU.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on party positions (A1–B2); MEDIUM on agency and civil society inference (B3–C3).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-master-stakeholder-table">Master stakeholder table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-stakeholder-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-master-stakeholder-table">Master stakeholder table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-master-stakeholder-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -869,18 +869,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-master-stakeholder-table">Master stakeholder table<a class="" aria-hi
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th align="center">CU25</th><th align="center">SfU23</th><th align="center">FiU23</th><th align="center">AU15</th><th align="center">CU29</th><th>Dominant lens</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M (Moderates)</td><td align="center">+++ lead</td><td align="center">++ support</td><td align="center">+ stewardship</td><td align="center">+ technical</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">+++ lead</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">± (defends carve-out)</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">+++ (max framing)</td><td align="center">− (Riksbank critical)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">−</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">± (crime triangulation)</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">−− (environmental)</td><td align="center">−−</td><td align="center">± (mandate critical)</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">−−</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">+++</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+ (carve-out champion)</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++</td><td>Parties</td></tr><tr><td>Kriminalvården</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Migrationsverket</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++ (dual-track burden)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Riksbank</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Arbetsmiljöverket / DO</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Boverket / Energimynd.</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td>Agency (delivery)</td></tr><tr><td>Universities (SUHF)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td>Civil society</td></tr><tr><td>LO / TCO / Saco</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+++</td><td align="center">+</td><td>Civil society</td></tr><tr><td>Svenskt Näringsliv</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">− (cost)</td><td align="center">++</td><td>Civil society</td></tr><tr><td>Local councils (SKR)</td><td align="center">++ (host sites)</td><td align="center">±</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++ (planning)</td><td>Subnational</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+ (Schengen)</td><td align="center">+ (ECB-aligned)</td><td align="center">+++ (ILO)</td><td align="center">++ (Fit for 55)</td><td>International</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Legend: <code>+++</code> strong support, <code>++</code> support, <code>+</code> mild support, <code>±</code> split / conditional, <code>0</code> neutral / N/A, <code>−</code> opposed, <code>−−</code> strong opposition.</p>
 <p>Sources: party group communications at <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/partierna</a> [A1]; agency mandate references at <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>, <a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>, <a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a> [A2]; civil-society baselines at <a href="https://www.suhf.se/">suhf.se</a>, <a href="https://www.lo.se/">lo.se</a>, <a href="https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/">svensktnaringsliv.se</a> [B2]; SKR baseline at <a href="https://www.skr.se/">skr.se</a> [A2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative">Per-document stakeholder narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity">HD01CU25 — prison capacity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative">Per-document stakeholder narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-stakeholder-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity">HD01CU25 — prison capacity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25--prison-capacity"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: Kriminalvården (mandate expansion), local councils hosting new sites (employment + infrastructure), construction sector. <strong>Losers</strong>: local councils at risk of environmental-carve-out procedural strain; MP/V constituencies on environmental grounds. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: Kriminalvården Q2 status report — sets delivery credibility. Evidence: <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se/om-oss/verksamhet/anstalter-och-hakten</a>, <code>HD01CU25</code> [A2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers">HD01SfU23 — migration / researchers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers">HD01SfU23 — migration / researchers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23--migration--researchers"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: Sweden's university sector (SUHF advocacy group) on carve-out; Migrationsverket enforcement division. <strong>Losers</strong>: international students under abuse-prevention tightening; civil-society immigrant-rights orgs. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: SUHF + individual research-university rectors (KTH, KI, Lund, Uppsala) — their position determines L defection probability. Evidence: <a href="https://www.suhf.se/">suhf.se</a>, <code>HD01SfU23</code> [A2/B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025">HD01FiU23 — Riksbank 2025<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025">HD01FiU23 — Riksbank 2025<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23--riksbank-2025"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: Riksbank General Council (standing affirmation); financial-stability interests. <strong>Losers</strong>: none direct; V rhetorical loss. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: FiU chair — sequencing of recapitalisation hearing vs. annual review. Evidence: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a>, <code>HD01FiU23</code> [A1].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions">HD01AU15 — ILO conventions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions">HD01AU15 — ILO conventions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15--ilo-conventions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: LO/TCO/Saco (negotiating leverage); Arbetsmiljöverket/DO (mandate clarification); women and gender-minority workers (C190 scope). <strong>Losers</strong>: small employers on compliance-cost margin. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: Arbetsmiljöverket guidance capacity. Evidence: <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>, <a href="https://www.lo.se/">lo.se</a>, <code>HD01AU15</code> [A1/B2].</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging">HD01CU29 — EV charging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging">HD01CU29 — EV charging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29--ev-charging"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Winners</strong>: homeowners with detached dwellings (primary subsidy beneficiaries); EV OEMs; Energimyndigheten. <strong>Losers</strong>: tenants in multi-dwelling buildings without assigned parking (design gap); grid-peak cost allocation may fall on non-EV households. <strong>Decisive actor</strong>: Boverket regulatory draft. Evidence: <a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     Tidö["Tidö coalition&#x3C;br/>M/KD/L/SD"] --> CU25
     Tidö --> SfU23
@@ -907,14 +907,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style MV fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style RB fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style LO fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-5">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-5"></a></h3>
 <p>See master table for per-row citations. All party positions inferred from published 2025–26 party group statements and prior-vote record at <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/voteringar</a>.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: leading indicator register for +30 d / +60 d / +90 d / +180 d horizons.
 <strong>Standards</strong>: each indicator has owner, source URL, expected date, and detection signal.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2) on sources; MEDIUM (C3) on expected-date predictions.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators">Indicator register (≥ 10 dated indicators)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators">Indicator register (≥ 10 dated indicators)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-register--10-dated-indicators">Indicator register (≥ 10 d
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th align="center">Horizon</th><th align="center">Expected date</th><th>Owner/Source</th><th>Signal</th><th>PIR link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">I1</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 2026 capacity status</td><td align="center">+60 d</td><td align="center">2026-06-23</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2]</td><td>± 5 % of plan → S1; > 10 % slip → S2</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I2</td><td>SfU23 implementation ordinance published</td><td align="center">+90 d</td><td align="center">2026-07-20</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Carve-out scope wording determines L-posture</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I3</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen PT on SfU23 test case</td><td align="center">+180 d</td><td align="center">rolling (by 2026-10)</td><td><a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> [A1]</td><td>PT granted → S3 activation</td><td>PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I4</td><td>FiU separate recapitalisation hearing schedule</td><td align="center">+30 d</td><td align="center">2026-05-24</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a> [A1]</td><td>Separate hearing → KJ-4 ≥ 0.45 confirmed</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I5</td><td>Migrationsverket IT transformation programme status</td><td align="center">+90 d</td><td align="center">2026-07-20</td><td><a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Status-red → SfU23 cascade risk elevated</td><td>PIR-4</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I6</td><td>Arbetsmiljöverket C190 implementation guidance</td><td align="center">+180 d</td><td align="center">2026-10-22</td><td><a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Publication on time → AU15 on track</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I7</td><td>Liberalerna party-group position paper</td><td align="center">+30 d</td><td align="center">2026-05-23</td><td><a href="https://www.liberalerna.se/">liberalerna.se</a> [B2]</td><td>Published position on CU25/SfU23 → confirms defection risk posture</td><td>PIR-6</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I8</td><td>MSB disinformation observatory — SfU23 / CU25 narrative volume</td><td align="center">rolling</td><td align="center">weekly to 2026-09</td><td><a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Spike → campaign-impact risk elevated</td><td>PIR-7</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I9</td><td>Novus / Sifo polling May-June 2026 wave</td><td align="center">+30 d → +60 d</td><td align="center">2026-05 → 2026-06</td><td><a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a> / <a href="https://sifo.se/">sifo.se</a> [B2]</td><td>Tidö bloc Δ ≥ ± 1.5 pp</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I10</td><td>Riksbank 2026 Q2 penningpolitisk rapport</td><td align="center">+90 d</td><td align="center">2026-07-02</td><td><a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> [A1]</td><td>Balance-sheet narrative trigger → S4 activation</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I11</td><td>Kriminalvården procurement-award announcements</td><td align="center">+60 d → +90 d</td><td align="center">rolling 2026-05 → 2026-07</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2]</td><td>Awards on schedule → S1; challenges/appeals → S2</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I12</td><td>Riksrevisionen audit notifications</td><td align="center">+180 d</td><td align="center">by 2026-10</td><td><a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a> [A2]</td><td>New audit on CU25 or SfU23 → escalation signal</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I13</td><td>Nordic Council / EU-level coverage of AU15 + CU29</td><td align="center">rolling</td><td align="center">by 2026-07</td><td><a href="https://www.norden.org/">norden.org</a> [B3]</td><td>Major coverage → S5 activation</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I14</td><td>Opposition motion filings referencing CU25 / SfU23</td><td align="center">rolling</td><td align="center">weekly to 2026-06</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> [A1]</td><td>Volume surge → framing intensification</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I15</td><td>S/V/MP coordinated press-event windows</td><td align="center">+30 d → +60 d</td><td align="center">2026-05 → 2026-06</td><td><a href="https://www.socialdemokraterna.se/">socialdemokraterna.se</a> [B3]</td><td>Coordinated timing → campaign alignment signal</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-stacked-diagram">Horizon-stacked diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-stacked-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-stacked-diagram">Horizon-stacked diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-stacked-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     B[Base 2026-04-24]
     B --> H30[+30d indicators]
@@ -1108,41 +1108,41 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-stacked-diagram">Horizon-stacked diagram<a class="" aria-hidd
     I6 AV C190 guidance           :d2, 2026-09-01, 60d
     I12 Riksrevisionen audits     :d3, 2026-08-01, 90d
     I13 Nordic/EU coverage        :d4, 2026-05-01, 90d</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-score">Priority score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-score"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-score">Priority score<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-score"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>P0</strong> (report-triggering): I1, I2, I4, I11 — directly drive scenario transitions.</li>
 <li><strong>P1</strong> (signal-confirming): I3, I5, I7, I10, I12 — confirm/disconfirm mainline judgments.</li>
 <li><strong>P2</strong> (contextual): I6, I8, I9, I13, I14, I15 — frame movement in surrounding narrative space.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-6">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All indicator sources cited above [A1–B3]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/strategic-extensions-methodology.md</code> (Alternative futures + leading indicators).
 <strong>Horizon</strong>: baseline 2026-04-24 → Sep 2026 general election → 2027 H1 implementation.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM overall (C3); HIGH on event set (B2), MEDIUM on probability weighting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 100 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-">Scenario 1 — "Signature delivery locked in" (p = 40 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 100 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-">Scenario 1 — "Signature delivery locked in" (p = 40 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--signature-delivery-locked-in-p--40-"></a></h4>
 <p>CU25 Kriminalvården capacity report (+60 d) confirms on-track delivery; SfU23 transposes cleanly with researcher-carve-out operational by 2026 Q3; FiU23 passes without recapitalisation drama. Tidö enters Sep 2026 election with credible delivery ledger. Leading indicator: <strong>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status within ± 5 % of plan</strong> (<a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2], <code>HD01CU25</code>).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-">Scenario 2 — "Partial inversion on CU25" (p = 25 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-">Scenario 2 — "Partial inversion on CU25" (p = 25 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-inversion-on-cu25-p--25-"></a></h4>
 <p>CU25 timeline slips ≥ 10 %; SfU23 and FiU23 land cleanly. Opposition weaponises delivery gap; Tidö still holds net-positive delivery narrative on migration and monetary stewardship. Leading indicator: <strong>Kriminalvården Q2 report reveals > 10 % capacity shortfall OR Riksrevisionen audit flags procurement</strong> (<a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a> [A2]).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-">Scenario 3 — "Migration legal cascade" (p = 15 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-">Scenario 3 — "Migration legal cascade" (p = 15 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--migration-legal-cascade-p--15-"></a></h4>
 <p>Migrationsöverdomstolen issues adverse proportionality ruling on SfU23 abuse-prevention provisions; Migrationsverket IT build slips ≥ 6 months. SfU23 becomes a liability. Leading indicator: <strong>Domstolsväsendet prövningstillstånd on SfU23 test case OR MV transformation-programme status flagged at Digg</strong> (<a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a>, <a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a> [B2], <code>HD01SfU23</code>).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-">Scenario 4 — "Institutional-credibility crisis" (p = 12 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-">Scenario 4 — "Institutional-credibility crisis" (p = 12 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--institutional-credibility-crisis-p--12-"></a></h4>
 <p>Riksbank recapitalisation becomes 2026 chamber-floor debate triggered by FiU23 review, dragging out into June 2026. V and MP amplify mandate questions; L and C protect independence. Leading indicator: <strong>FiU scheduling a separate recapitalisation hearing OR Riksbank publication of extraordinary balance-sheet communication</strong> (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> [A1], <code>HD01FiU23</code>).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-">Scenario 5 — "Broad-consensus windfall" (p = 8 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-">Scenario 5 — "Broad-consensus windfall" (p = 8 %)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-5--broad-consensus-windfall-p--8-"></a></h4>
 <p>AU15 ratification + CU29 EV-charging rollout generate unexpectedly large reputational dividends (Nordic + EU media); Tidö leverages into a L-led pre-election consensus pivot. Probability low because these are not campaign-decisive issues. Leading indicator: <strong>Nordic Council coverage of AU15 ratification debate OR major EU climate outlet coverage of CU29 model</strong> (<a href="https://www.norden.org/">norden.org</a> [B3], <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram">Scenario likelihood diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram">Scenario likelihood diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-likelihood-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">pie title Scenario probabilities (Sep 2026 horizon)
     "S1 Signature delivery locked in" : 40
     "S2 Partial inversion on CU25" : 25
     "S3 Migration legal cascade" : 15
     "S4 Institutional-credibility crisis" : 12
     "S5 Broad-consensus windfall" : 8</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-branching-tree">Branching tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-branching-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-branching-tree">Branching tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-branching-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Base[2026-04-24 baseline]
     Base --> Q2[Q2 2026 status cycle]
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-branching-tree">Branching tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
     style E3 fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style E4 fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style E5 fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-indicators-summary">Key indicators summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-indicators-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-indicators-summary">Key indicators summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-indicators-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1210,14 +1210,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-indicators-summary">Key indicators summary<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Leading indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity within ± 5 % of plan</td><td><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a></td><td>+60 d</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Capacity shortfall > 10 % OR Riksrevisionen audit flag</td><td><a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a></td><td>+60 d to +120 d</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen PT granted on SfU23 test case</td><td><a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a></td><td>+90 d to +180 d</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>FiU separate recap hearing scheduled</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a></td><td>+30 d to +60 d</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Nordic Council or EU media major AU15 / CU29 coverage</td><td><a href="https://www.norden.org/">norden.org</a></td><td>+60 d to +180 d</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-7">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-7">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-7"></a></h3>
 <p><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 at data.riksdagen.se; agency + judicial leading indicators cited above.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> (5 dimensions: Institutional, Operational, Fiscal, Political-reputational, Legal-compliance).
 <strong>Method</strong>: Likelihood (L, 1–5) × Impact (I, 1–5) → Risk score (1–25). Cascading chains + posterior probabilities via Bayesian update where prior data exists.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on top-3 risks (B2); MEDIUM on tail risks (C3).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th>Source doc</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">I</th><th align="center">Score</th><th align="center">Posterior</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">R1</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Kriminalvården capacity timeline slippage ≥ 10 % vs. plan</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">55 % (prior 45 %, updated on 2024 capacity-report miss pattern)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a>, <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> [A2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R2</td><td>Legal-compliance</td><td>SfU23 abuse-prevention provisions challenged on proportionality at Migrationsöverdomstolen</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">40 % (prior 35 %, updated on 2024 SfU permit-revocation jurisprudence)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>, <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> [B3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R3</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>CU25 construction cost overrun ≥ 20 % vs. Kriminalvården 2025 baseline</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">50 % (prior 40 %, updated on 2022–24 major infra cost-overrun pattern)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a>, <a href="https://www.esv.se/">esv.se</a> [B2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R4</td><td>Political-reputational</td><td>Riksbank recapitalisation becomes 2026 chamber-floor debate, eclipsing FiU23 standing review</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">45 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a>, <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> [A2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R5</td><td>Operational</td><td>Migrationsverket dual-track IT build on SfU23 delayed by ≥ 6 months</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">55 % (prior 50 %, updated on 2023–24 MV IT-project slippage base rate)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>, <a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a> [B2]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R6</td><td>Legal-compliance</td><td>ILO C190 transposition timing pressure from 2027 reporting cycle</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">40 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a>, <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a> [A1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R7</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>CU29 home-charging subsidy regressivity (upper-income capture > 60 %)</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">50 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a>, <a href="https://www.ei.se/">ei.se</a> [C3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R8</td><td>Political-reputational</td><td>L defection on SfU23 researcher carve-out if SD maximalist</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">30 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>, L party 2026 position papers <a href="https://www.liberalerna.se/">liberalerna.se</a> [C3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R9</td><td>Operational</td><td>AU15 Arbetsmiljöverket guidance gap creates employer-compliance ambiguity</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">45 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a> [B3]</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R10</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Post-2026 government change disrupts CU25 multi-year delivery commitment</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">40 %</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [B2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk heat map (L × I)
     x-axis Low likelihood --> High likelihood
@@ -1364,8 +1364,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     "R8 L defection": [0.35, 0.58]
     "R9 AU15 guidance": [0.55, 0.38]
     "R10 Post-election handover": [0.55, 0.78]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse">Chain A: Delivery-credibility collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse">Chain A: Delivery-credibility collapse<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     R1[R1 Capacity slip] --> M1[Media: Kriminalvården misses plan]
     R3[R3 Cost overrun] --> M1
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-a-delivery-credibility-collapse">Chain A: Delivery-credibility
     style P1 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style El fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
 <p>Joint probability ≥ 1 R1/R3/R10 event within 2026 Q3: ~ 0.70. If joint ≥ 2 events: ~ 0.40. Source: Bayesian update on 2022–24 base rates — <code>kriminalvarden.se</code> annual reports, ESV major-project tracking.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade">Chain B: Migration legal–operational cascade<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade">Chain B: Migration legal–operational cascade<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade"></a></h4>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     R2[R2 Proportionality challenge] --> Court[Migrationsöverdomstolen injunction]
     R5[R5 MV IT slip] --> Op[Migrationsverket handling-time surge]
@@ -1392,21 +1392,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-chain-b-migration-legaloperational-cascade">Chain B: Migration legal
     style Court fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Op fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Pol fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigations-recommended">Mitigations (recommended)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-recommended"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigations-recommended">Mitigations (recommended)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-recommended"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R1 / R3 / R10</strong> — Kriminalvården quarterly capacity-status publication cadence, with KU pre-flagging the Q2 2026 status report. Cost: low. Source: <code>HD01CU25</code> + Kriminalvården standard reporting.</li>
 <li><strong>R2 / R5</strong> — Pre-enactment Migrationsverket IT architecture review by PTS/Digg; proportionality impact assessment published alongside ordinance. Source: <code>HD01SfU23</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>R4</strong> — FiU to schedule Riksbank recapitalisation hearing separately from annual review to separate narratives. Source: <code>HD01FiU23</code>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-8">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-8">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-8"></a></h3>
 <p>Every row cites <code>dok_id</code> + authoritative implementation agency URL (kriminalvarden.se, migrationsverket.se, riksbank.se, ilo.org, ei.se, domstol.se, av.se).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-swot-framework.md</code> + TOWS matrix.
 <strong>Scope</strong>: the 5-report cluster tabled 2026-04-23.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">S1</td><td>High-salience delivery signal for Tidö on crime + migration</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> prison expansion scope + <code>HD01SfU23</code> tighter study-permit controls (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a>)</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S2</td><td>Institutional-stewardship credibility via standing Riksbank review</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> continues annual FiU review per <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/finansutskottet</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S3</td><td>Consensus cover on labour + climate</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO C190/C155/C187) + <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV charging) at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a> and <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S4</td><td>Researcher carve-out in SfU23 protects competitiveness narrative</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> carve-out for forskare/doktorander at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S5</td><td>Cross-committee composition demonstrates coalition working throughput</td><td>CU+SfU+FiU+AU all tabled same day (5 reports) per <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a> calendar</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">W1</td><td>CU25 procurement and environmental-permit compression exposes legal challenge risk</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> expansion timeline vs. Kriminalvården planning baseline (<a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>)</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W2</td><td>SfU23 dual-track (tightening + carve-out) doubles Migrationsverket IT and caseworker load</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> scope + Migrationsverket 2025 annual report handling-time trend (<a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>)</td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W3</td><td>FiU23 re-opens the unresolved balance-sheet / recapitalisation narrative</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> on Riksbank 2025 per <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> and prior <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a> metadata</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W4</td><td>AU15 ratification timing (Sweden among the later ratifiers of C190) is defensive framing</td><td>ILO ratifications list at <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>; Denmark 2022, Finland 2023</td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W5</td><td>CU29 funding model for home-charging subsidies is underspecified in the report title scope</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">O1</td><td>Pair AU15 ratification with EU Platform Work Directive transposition for EU-policy reputational dividend</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + EU PWD transposition deadline references at <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/arbetsmarknadsdepartementet</a></td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O2</td><td>Use CU29 to anchor 2026 climate pillar for L/C/MP-curious voters</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> + Energimyndigheten charging-infrastructure baseline (<a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a>)</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O3</td><td>SfU23 carve-out creates bilateral positioning space with Nordic research partners</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> carve-out + Nordic Council of Ministers research mobility programmes</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O4</td><td>FiU23 review anchors standing inflation-credibility message pre-election</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> + <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se Penningpolitisk rapport</a></td><td align="center">A1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O5</td><td>CU25 procurement velocity creates civil-construction jobs in low-population regions</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + Kriminalvården planned sites at <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a></td><td align="center">B2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">T1</td><td>CU25 timeline slippage inverts crime-delivery narrative pre-election</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + prior Kriminalvården capacity-report miss pattern <a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se/om-oss</a></td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T2</td><td>SfU23 abuse-prevention provisions face judicial review on proportionality</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + Migrationsöverdomstolen jurisprudence at <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a></td><td align="center">B3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T3</td><td>Riksbank recapitalisation becomes 2026 debate focal point</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> + <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> 2023–24 annual reports</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T4</td><td>ILO ratification + transposition creates compliance litigation baseline for employers</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + Svenskt Näringsliv position papers at <a href="https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/">svensktnaringsliv.se</a></td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T5</td><td>CU29 home-charging incentives capture by grid-peak cost allocation creates regressive effect</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> + Energimarknadsinspektionen tariff framework <a href="https://www.ei.se/">ei.se</a></td><td align="center">C3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies">TOWS matrix (derived strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies">TOWS matrix (derived strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1600,13 +1600,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-derived-strategies">TOWS matrix (derived strategies)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>S (internal +)</th><th>W (internal -)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>O (external +)</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Pair S1+S3 with O1+O2 — message "delivery + EU-compatible workers' rights + climate" (<code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>)</td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Use O1 (EU PWD pair) to offset W4 (late ratification) narrative on <code>HD01AU15</code></td></tr><tr><td><strong>T (external -)</strong></td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Use S2 institutional credibility (<code>HD01FiU23</code>) to preempt T3 balance-sheet narrative</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: Pre-publish Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status to defuse W1+T1 combination on <code>HD01CU25</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters">Cross-SWOT integration (policy clusters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters">Cross-SWOT integration (policy clusters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-integration-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Law-and-order delivery cluster</strong> (CU25 ↔ SfU23): S1+S4 combine with T1+T2 — if CU25 timeline slips <em>and</em> SfU23 gets judicial pushback, the combined narrative inversion is larger than either alone. Source: <code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Institutional-stewardship cluster</strong> (FiU23 ↔ AU15): S2+O4 combine to anchor a pre-election "responsible management" frame; T3 is the counter-frame. Source: <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Climate-mobility cluster</strong> (CU29 only): isolated; O2 creates option to pair with future CU committee agenda. Source: <code>HD01CU29</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-diagram">Cluster diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-diagram">Cluster diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
     S1["S1 Delivery signal&#x3C;br/>CU25+SfU23"]
     S2["S2 Institutional&#x3C;br/>FiU23"]
@@ -1625,15 +1625,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-diagram">Cluster diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style ST fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style ST2 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style NarrInv fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-9">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-9">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-9"></a></h3>
 <p>All rows cite <code>dok_id</code> + primary-source URL. See <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> for policy-cluster citations.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: <code>analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md</code> — Political Threat Taxonomy with attack tree + kill chain + MITRE-style TTP mapping.
 <strong>Scope</strong>: threats to democratic institutions, policy integrity, and epistemic environment arising from today's 5-report cluster.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — intent signals are indirect; capability signals are well-attested.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category">Threat taxonomy (per-category)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-institutional-threats">Institutional threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-threats"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category">Threat taxonomy (per-category)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-per-category"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-institutional-threats">Institutional threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-institutional-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-institutional-threats">Institutional threats<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">T#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th>Kill-chain stage</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">TI-1</td><td>Erosion of Riksbank independence perception via recapitalisation debate conflation</td><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> + 2023–24 <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a> balance-sheet reports</td><td>Weaponise (rhetorical framing)</td><td align="center">A2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TI-2</td><td>CU25 planning-law carve-outs normalising shortcut procedure for future infra</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + Miljöbalken 6 kap references (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/dokument/1998:808</a>)</td><td>Install (precedent)</td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TI-3</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen caseload surge degrading appeal-quality on SfU23</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + <a href="https://www.domstol.se/">domstol.se</a> appeal-handling-time metric</td><td>Impact (institutional capacity)</td><td align="center">B3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-policy-integrity-threats">Policy-integrity threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-integrity-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-policy-integrity-threats">Policy-integrity threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-integrity-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-policy-integrity-threats">Policy-integrity threats<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">T#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th>Kill-chain stage</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">TP-1</td><td>SfU23 abuse-prevention scope-creep via ministerial ordinance</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + regeringsformen 8:7 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/regeringsformen</a>)</td><td>Exploit (delegated power)</td><td align="center">B2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TP-2</td><td>CU29 subsidy capture by property-developer lobby re-routing design</td><td><code>HD01CU29</code> + public consultation history on energy/property interface (<a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>)</td><td>Exploit (regulatory-design)</td><td align="center">C3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TP-3</td><td>AU15 employer-compliance guidance thinning under ratification-without-resources dynamic</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a> resource trajectory</td><td>Impact (enforcement gap)</td><td align="center">B3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-epistemic--information-threats">Epistemic / information threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-epistemic--information-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-epistemic--information-threats">Epistemic / information threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-epistemic--information-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-epistemic--information-threats">Epistemic / information threats<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">T#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Source</th><th>Kill-chain stage</th><th align="center">Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">TE-1</td><td>Disinformation campaigns amplifying CU25 slippage to delegitimise 2026 incumbent</td><td><code>HD01CU25</code> + MSB disinfo baseline <a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a></td><td>Amplify</td><td align="center">C3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TE-2</td><td>Social-media narrative lock-in on SfU23 "abuse" framing ahead of researcher-carve-out media cycle</td><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> + MSB / Diggs reports</td><td>Reconnaissance/Amplify</td><td align="center">C3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">TE-3</td><td>Polarised framing of ILO C190 as foreign-imposed on Swedish labour model</td><td><code>HD01AU15</code> + <a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a> ratification coverage</td><td>Weaponise</td><td align="center">D3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative">Attack tree — CU25 delegitimisation (illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative">Attack tree — CU25 delegitimisation (illustrative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     Goal[Goal: Delegitimise&#x3C;br/>CU25 delivery claim]
     A[A. Exploit timeline slip]
@@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--cu25-delegitimisation-illustrative">Attack tree — CU25
     style B2 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style C1 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff
     style C2 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-mapping">Kill chain mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-mapping">Kill chain mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-mapping">Kill chain mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>CU25 pathway</th><th>SfU23 pathway</th><th>FiU23 pathway</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Public capacity plans, procurement notices</td><td>Migrationsverket quarterly statistics</td><td>Riksbank annual report</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponise</td><td>Narrative framing kits, think-tank briefings</td><td>Social-media framing templates</td><td>Opinion editorial placement</td></tr><tr><td>Deliver</td><td>Press cycle, chamber debate, KU hearings</td><td>Chamber debate, court filings</td><td>FiU hearings, floor debate</td></tr><tr><td>Exploit</td><td>Procedural motion, amendment</td><td>Test case at Migrationsöverdomstolen</td><td>Independent-review motion</td></tr><tr><td>Install</td><td>Precedent on planning-law shortcut</td><td>Precedent on proportionality threshold</td><td>Precedent on recapitalisation procedure</td></tr><tr><td>Impact</td><td>Delivery credibility</td><td>Appeal capacity + research mobility</td><td>Monetary-policy credibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map">MITRE-style political TTP map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map">MITRE-style political TTP map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1860,38 +1860,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-political-ttp-map">MITRE-style political TTP map<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP ID</th><th>Technique</th><th>Instantiation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PT-RE-001</td><td>Reconnaissance: official statistics harvesting</td><td>Kriminalvården quarterly reports on <code>HD01CU25</code></td></tr><tr><td>PT-WE-002</td><td>Weaponise: narrative framing kits</td><td>Opposition think-tank briefings on CU25 / SfU23</td></tr><tr><td>PT-DE-003</td><td>Deliver: chamber debate staging</td><td>FiU / SfU / CU scheduled plenaries</td></tr><tr><td>PT-EX-004</td><td>Exploit: judicial review</td><td>Migrationsöverdomstolen on <code>HD01SfU23</code></td></tr><tr><td>PT-IN-005</td><td>Install: precedent anchoring</td><td>Planning-law carve-out on <code>HD01CU25</code></td></tr><tr><td>PT-IM-006</td><td>Impact: institutional-credibility erosion</td><td>Riksbank independence narrative on <code>HD01FiU23</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-prioritisation">Threat prioritisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-prioritisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-prioritisation">Threat prioritisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-prioritisation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>P1 (active, monitor)</strong>: TI-1 (Riksbank narrative), TI-2 (CU25 planning precedent), TI-3 (Migration court capacity).</li>
 <li><strong>P2 (latent, prepare)</strong>: TP-1 (SfU23 ordinance scope-creep), TE-1 (CU25 disinfo).</li>
 <li><strong>P3 (watch)</strong>: TP-2 / TP-3 / TE-2 / TE-3.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-10">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-10">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-10"></a></h3>
 <p>All threats cited with <code>dok_id</code> + primary agency URL. Epistemic threats calibrated against <a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a> disinformation baseline (2023–25 reports, B2).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01au15">HD01AU15<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Arbetsmarknadsutskottet (AU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 45
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Internationell arbetsrätt; ILO C190 trolig huvudfokus. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01AU15</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/au</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Internationella arbetsorganisationens (ILO) konventioner, protokoll och rekommendationer"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Arbetsmarknadsutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 45</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -1903,7 +1903,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01AU15] --> C[AU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -1912,36 +1912,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 45 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-11">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-11">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-11"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01AU15"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25">HD01CU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 85
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>+8 500 häktes-/anstaltsplatser över 2026–2030; planlagsundantag. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-1">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-1">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU25</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/cu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-1">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-1">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Kriminalvårdens kapacitet"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Civilutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 85</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-1">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-1">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -1953,7 +1953,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-1">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-1">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-1">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01CU25] --> C[CU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -1962,36 +1962,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-1">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-1">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-1">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 85 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-12">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-12">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-12"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01CU25"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu29">HD01CU29<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Civilutskottet (CU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 50
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Laddbox/typ-2 subsidieregim; Boverket + Energimyndigheten. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-2">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-2">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01CU29</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01CU29</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/cu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-2">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-2">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Laddning av elfordon i det egna hemmet"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Civilutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 50</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-2">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-2">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-2">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-2">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-2">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01CU29] --> C[CU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -2012,36 +2012,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-2">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-2">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-2">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 50 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-13">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-13">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-13"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01CU29"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23">HD01FiU23<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Finansutskottet (FiU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 65
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Balansräkning 2024–25, rekapitaliseringsfråga latent. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-3">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-3">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01FiU23</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01FiU23</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/fiu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-3">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-3">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Riksbankens verksamhet 2025"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Finansutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 65</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-3">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-3">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-3">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-3">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-3">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01FiU23] --> C[FiU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -2062,36 +2062,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-3">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-3">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-3">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 65 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-14">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-14">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-14"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01FiU23"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23">HD01SfU23<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Committee</strong>: Socialförsäkringsutskottet (SfU)
 <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26   <strong>Tabling date</strong>: 2026-04-23 (lookback from 2026-04-24)
 <strong>DIW</strong>: 80
 <strong>Confidence on analysis</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — title + metadata inference pending full text.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Dubbelspår: skärpning + forskarundantag. This per-document brief tracks the item through the coordinated 2026-04-24 cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>../synthesis-summary.md</code></a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></a>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-identifiers-4">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-identifiers-4">Document identifiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-identifiers-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong><code>dok_id</code></strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code></li>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD01SfU23</a> [A1]</li>
 <li><strong>Committee landing</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden/">riksdagen.se/sfu</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-content-inferred-4">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-content-inferred-4">Key content inferred<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-content-inferred-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Title: "Migration, arbetskraft och forskare"</li>
 <li>Committee discipline: Socialförsäkringsutskottet standard instrument for this policy area.</li>
 <li>Expected outcome: adoption with bloc-line voting per <code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p>This report carries <strong>DIW 80</strong> in the cluster ranking — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>../significance-scoring.md</code></a>. Rationale: salience × coalition-stress × precedent-value per the DIW framework in <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-4">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-linked-artifacts-4">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-linked-artifacts-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Cluster overview: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/README.md"><code>../README.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Executive brief: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>../executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-linked-artifacts-4">Linked artifacts<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li>Scenarios: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
 <li>Intelligence assessment: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-4">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-4">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-specific-mermaid-4"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     D[HD01SfU23] --> C[SfU]
     C --> Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
@@ -2112,18 +2112,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-specific-mermaid-4">Document-specific Mermaid<a class="" ari
     style C fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cluster fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pass-2-note-4">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pass-2-note-4">Pass-2 note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pass-2-note-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Pass 2 revalidated DIW 80 against sensitivity band documented in <code>../significance-scoring.md</code> and confirmed the coalition-stress and electoral-salience sub-scores are internally consistent with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>../coalition-mathematics.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-15">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-15">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-15"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument({"dok_id":"HD01SfU23"})</code> → data.riksdagen.se [A1]</li>
 <li>Committee context: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten-och-eu-namnden</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Horizon</strong>: Sep 2026 general election (~140 days from base date).
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on electoral impact inferences; HIGH (B2) on delivery-indicator logic.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items">Electoral salience ranking of cluster items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items">Electoral salience ranking of cluster items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2166,20 +2166,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-salience-ranking-of-cluster-items">Electoral salience ranki
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th align="center">Electoral salience (0-100)</th><th>Base for rating</th><th>Expected voter segments activated</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity</td><td align="center">95</td><td>Top-3 voter priority (law-and-order) per 2025 Q4 Novus/Sifo</td><td>M, KD, SD base + swing-urban swing</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers</td><td align="center">80</td><td>Top-5 voter priority (migration)</td><td>SD base + competitiveness-minded M/L</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank</td><td align="center">55</td><td>Elite-salient, low mass-salient</td><td>Finance-sector, urban professional</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO</td><td align="center">35</td><td>Low mass-salient, HR/labour niche</td><td>Unionised workers, liberal professional</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging</td><td align="center">45</td><td>Moderate suburban-detached-housing salient</td><td>M suburban, MP climate, L suburban</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-likely-campaign-framings">Likely campaign framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-campaign-framings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tidö-framings-pro">Tidö framings (pro)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-framings-pro"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-likely-campaign-framings">Likely campaign framings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-likely-campaign-framings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tidö-framings-pro">Tidö framings (pro)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-framings-pro"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Delivery ledger</strong>: "Vi levererar: 8 500 nya häktes-/anstaltsplatser (CU25), stramare migration med kompetensskydd (SfU23), ansvarsfull ekonomi (FiU23)."</li>
 <li><strong>Breadth</strong>: "Vi ratificerar också internationella arbetsnormer (AU15) och stöttar omställningen (CU29)."</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-opposition-framings-contra">Opposition framings (contra)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framings-contra"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opposition-framings-contra">Opposition framings (contra)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framings-contra"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S</strong> — "Tidö misslyckas med välfärd medan man bygger fängelser" (social-priority inversion).</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong> — "Institutionella fundament urholkas" (Riksbank + Riksrevisionen framing).</li>
 <li><strong>MP</strong> — "Klimatomställning underprioriteras jämfört med straffskärpning."</li>
 <li><strong>C</strong> — "Kommunalt självbestämmande undergrävs av CU25-planlagsundantag."</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-potential-inflection-points">Potential inflection points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-potential-inflection-points"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-potential-inflection-points">Potential inflection points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-potential-inflection-points"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2216,12 +2216,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-potential-inflection-points">Potential inflection points<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date (approx)</th><th>Event</th><th>Expected electoral consequence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-06-23</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity status</td><td>If on-track: CU25 becomes campaign asset (+2 pp M/KD); if slip ≥ 10 %: CU25 becomes liability (-1.5 pp Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07</td><td>SfU23 implementation ordinance</td><td>Defines L's in-coalition posture; carve-out clarity +0.5 pp L</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08</td><td>Riksbank penningpolitisk rapport</td><td>Could trigger FiU recap debate surge (+1 pp V, -0.5 pp Tidö)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08</td><td>Migration-permit Q2 stats</td><td>If abuse-statistic drops: SfU23 asset; else liability</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09</td><td>General election</td><td>Outcome</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication">Coalition-stress electoral implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication">Coalition-stress electoral implication<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stress-electoral-implication"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SD–L stress</strong> on SfU23 is contained (&#x3C; 20 % defection probability per KJ-3). L electorate (urban liberal, university towns) responsive to carve-out framing.</li>
 <li><strong>M–KD stress</strong> on CU29 subsidy cost is low-grade; KD electorate (suburban family) receptive to distributive framing.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-polling-impact">Expected polling impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-polling-impact"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-polling-impact">Expected polling impact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-polling-impact"></a></h3>
 <p>Based on Bayesian update on 2022–24 committee-report clusters:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>If delivery on CU25 + SfU23</strong>: Tidö bloc +1.5 to +3 pp through August 2026.</li>
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expected-polling-impact">Expected polling impact<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>If slip on both</strong>: Tidö bloc -1.5 to -3 pp; opposition bloc +1 to +2 pp.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Prior distribution P(delivery-on-track) = 0.45; P(CU25-only-slip) = 0.30; P(both-slip) = 0.25.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram">Cluster-level electoral impact diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram">Cluster-level electoral impact diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     C[Committee Cluster 2026-04-24]
     C --> CU25E[CU25 Salience 95]
@@ -2255,17 +2255,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-level-electoral-impact-diagram">Cluster-level electoral impac
     style Opp fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cons fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Sep fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-16">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-16">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-16"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.val.se/">val.se</a> (election calendar) [A1]</li>
 <li>Novus/Sifo 2025 Q4 priority rankings (<a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a>) [B2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Current 2022–2026 Riksdag arithmetic applied to cluster-item voting scenarios.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2) on seat counts; MEDIUM (C3) on defection probabilities.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat">Current Riksdag seat distribution (349 mandat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat">Current Riksdag seat distribution (349 mandat)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2328,8 +2328,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-349-mandat">Current Riksdag seat di
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="center">Mandat</th><th>Block</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Tidö (confidence &#x26; supply)</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>Majority 175</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>173</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Source: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/ledamoter-och-partier</a> [A1].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-floor-vote-projections">Expected floor vote projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-floor-vote-projections"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-floor-vote-projections">Expected floor vote projections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-floor-vote-projections"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU25</code> pri
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">173</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Outcome: adopted 176-173. Tidö margin 3 seats — no defections tolerable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2489,7 +2489,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01sfu23-migrationresearchers--expected-outcome"><code>HD01SfU23</co
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">173</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Conditional on L staying: adopted 176-173. If L defects (&#x3C; 20 % probability per KJ-3): 160-189, defeated.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank 2025 — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank 2025 — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2569,7 +2569,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025--expected-outcome"><code>HD01FiU23</code> Rik
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">307</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">42</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Broad-consensus review — expected adoption 307-42.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO ratification — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO ratification — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2649,7 +2649,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01au15-ilo-ratification--expected-outcome"><code>HD01AU15</code> IL
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">276</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Expected adoption 276-73 with SD opposition likely (nationalist frame).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging — Expected outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2729,7 +2729,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging--expected-outcome"><code>HD01CU29</code> EV
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Result</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">SD</th><th align="center">M</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">C</th><th align="center">KD</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">L</th><th align="center">Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ja</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nej</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Avstår</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">173</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Frånvarande</strong></td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Seats</strong></td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">73</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">18</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">349</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Adopted 176-0; opposition abstains (distributive critique but not full opposition).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline">Post-election 2026 scenarios (350 polling + Sifo baseline)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline">Post-election 2026 scenarios (350 polling + Sifo baseline)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-post-election-2026-scenarios-350-polling--sifo-baseline">Post-electio
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario (Q4 2025)</th><th align="center">Tidö Σ</th><th align="center">Opposition Σ</th><th align="center">Delta from current</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Base-polling projection</td><td align="center">165-170</td><td align="center">179-184</td><td align="center">Tidö loses majority</td></tr><tr><td>Optimistic-delivery projection</td><td align="center">172-178</td><td align="center">171-177</td><td align="center">Knife-edge</td></tr><tr><td>Pessimistic-slip projection</td><td align="center">158-164</td><td align="center">185-191</td><td align="center">Opposition majority ≥ 12</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram">Coalition arithmetic diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram">Coalition arithmetic diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     T[Tidö 176 mandat]
     O[Opposition 173 mandat]
@@ -2792,17 +2792,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic-diagram">Coalition arithmetic diagram<a class=""
     style V fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style C fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style MP fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-17">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-17">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-17"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/ledamoter-och-partier</a> seat distribution [A1]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 <li>Q4 2025 polling: Novus, Sifo, Demoskop aggregates [B2]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Segmentation framework</strong>: Swedish voter archetypes (7 segments) × cluster items.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on activation probabilities.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-segment--item-activation-matrix">Segment × item activation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment--item-activation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment--item-activation-matrix">Segment × item activation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment--item-activation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2882,19 +2882,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment--item-activation-matrix">Segment × item activation matrix<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th align="center">CU25</th><th align="center">SfU23</th><th align="center">FiU23</th><th align="center">AU15</th><th align="center">CU29</th><th align="center">Net activation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1. Law-and-order prioritisers</strong> (≈ 18 %)</td><td align="center">HIGH+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">CU25-driven, Tidö-favourable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2. Welfare-state defenders</strong> (≈ 22 %)</td><td align="center">HIGH−</td><td align="center">MEDIUM−</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">CU25-inversion, opposition-favourable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>3. Urban liberal professionals</strong> (≈ 12 %)</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">L-leaning if carve-out + delivery clean</td></tr><tr><td><strong>4. Suburban family voters</strong> (≈ 20 %)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">Mixed; housing/CU29 gateway</td></tr><tr><td><strong>5. Union and public-sector workers</strong> (≈ 15 %)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM−</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">S-leaning; AU15 is gain</td></tr><tr><td><strong>6. Climate / environment voters</strong> (≈ 7 %)</td><td align="center">LOW−</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">CU29-driven, MP/L-favourable</td></tr><tr><td><strong>7. Rural / small-town voters</strong> (≈ 6 %)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">MEDIUM+</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td align="center">MEDIUM−</td><td align="center">C-leaning; CU29 distributive concern</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Percentages approximate 2025 Q4 electorate structure per SCB [A1] + Novus segmentation (<a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a>) [B2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swing-voter-identification">Swing-voter identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swing-voter-identification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swing-voter-identification">Swing-voter identification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swing-voter-identification"></a></h3>
 <p>Two segments are pivotal for September:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Segment 3 (urban liberal professionals)</strong> — moved between L/C/M/S historically. SfU23 carve-out + AU15 ratification can lock in L vote; CU25 net neutral.</li>
 <li><strong>Segment 4 (suburban family voters)</strong> — swing between M/KD and S. CU25 + CU29 combination can reinforce M/KD cohesion; CU29 is a distributional test.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-activation-pathways">Activation pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-activation-pathways"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-activation-pathways">Activation pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-activation-pathways"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Tidö-favourable pathway</strong>: CU25 on-track + SfU23 carve-out operational + CU29 subsidy delivered → activation in segments 1, 4, with partial 3 — net + 1.5 to + 3 pp.</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition-favourable pathway</strong>: CU25 slip + SfU23 legal cascade + welfare-priority inversion framing effective → activation in segments 2, 5, 6 — net + 1 to + 2 pp opposition.</li>
 <li><strong>Institutional-independence pathway</strong>: FiU23 recapitalisation becomes central debate → activation in segments 3, 5 — ambiguous net effect; depends on framing.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-diagram">Segment diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-diagram">Segment diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     Cluster[2026-04-24 Cluster]
     Cluster --> S1[Law-and-order 18%]
@@ -2926,18 +2926,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-diagram">Segment diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     style O fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff
     style SW fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#b88500,color:#000
     style Sep fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-18">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-18">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-18"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>2025 Q4 SCB electorate structure (<a href="https://www.scb.se/">scb.se</a>) [A1]</li>
 <li>Novus/Sifo segmentation (<a href="https://novus.se/">novus.se</a>) [B2]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Outside-In analysis with Nordic + EU comparator set.
 <strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark (primary Nordic), Finland (primary Nordic), Norway (Nordic non-EU), Germany (EU large-state), Netherlands (EU mid-state).
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on ratification dates and formal regimes (A1); MEDIUM on implementation quality inferences (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-summary-table">Comparator summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-summary-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-summary-table">Comparator summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-summary-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3000,18 +3000,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-summary-table">Comparator summary table<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th align="center">ILO C190 ratified</th><th>Prison-capacity model</th><th>Central-bank recap precedent</th><th>Migration-research carve-out</th><th>EV home-charging regime</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden</strong> (subject)</td><td align="center">Pending via <code>HD01AU15</code></td><td>CU25 capex expansion</td><td>FiU23 review — recap ordinance pending</td><td>SfU23 dual-track</td><td>CU29 expanded subsidy</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td align="center">2022 (<a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>)</td><td>2021 reform — leased capacity + Kosovo pilot (<a href="https://www.justitsministeriet.dk/">justitsministeriet.dk</a>)</td><td>Nationalbanken equity reserved under statute (<a href="https://www.nationalbanken.dk/">nationalbanken.dk</a>)</td><td>PhD / researcher fast-track since 2020 (<a href="https://www.nyidanmark.dk/">nyidanmark.dk</a>)</td><td>Grøn Bolig / subsidised charging (<a href="https://ens.dk/">energistyrelsen.dk</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td align="center">2023 (<a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>)</td><td>2023 capacity-expansion bill (<a href="https://oikeusministerio.fi/">om.fi</a>)</td><td>Suomen Pankki statutory capital — Eurosystem framework</td><td>Researcher residence permit fast-track (<a href="https://migri.fi/">migri.fi</a>)</td><td>EV home-charging subsidy via ARA (<a href="https://www.ara.fi/">ara.fi</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td align="center">2023 (<a href="https://www.ilo.org/">ilo.org</a>)</td><td>Kriminalomsorgen long-term plan (<a href="https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/">kriminalomsorgen.no</a>)</td><td>Norges Bank capital rules — Fund-law interaction</td><td>Researcher fast-track (<a href="https://www.udi.no/">udi.no</a>)</td><td>Enova support scheme (<a href="https://www.enova.no/">enova.no</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td align="center">2022 (<a href="https://www.bmas.de/">bmas.de</a>)</td><td>Federal-state co-investment on Justizvollzug</td><td>Bundesbank statutory framework (ECB)</td><td>Blaue Karte + research fast-track</td><td>KfW home-charging programme (<a href="https://www.kfw.de/">kfw.de</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Netherlands</strong></td><td align="center">2023 (<a href="https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/">rijksoverheid.nl</a>)</td><td>Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen long-term capacity plan</td><td>DNB recap via statutory process (<a href="https://www.dnb.nl/">dnb.nl</a>)</td><td>Kennismigrant visa regime (<a href="https://ind.nl/">ind.nl</a>)</td><td>Subsidieregeling elektrische personenauto's (<a href="https://www.rvo.nl/">rvo.nl</a>)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-lessons">Outside-In lessons<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-lessons"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification">For <code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO ratification)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-lessons">Outside-In lessons<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-lessons"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification">For <code>HD01AU15</code> (ILO ratification)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01au15-ilo-ratification"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden is among the later ratifiers — Denmark 2022, Finland/Norway/Netherlands 2023, Germany 2022. The late-ratification framing is quantitatively supported: of 5 Nordic/EU comparators, 4 ratified C190 before Sweden. Defence: Swedish legal compatibility review (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>) treated C190 as requiring transposition work in Diskrimineringslagen and Arbetsmiljölagen — a substantive rather than symbolic approach. [Source A1 ilo.org]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity">For <code>HD01CU25</code> (prison capacity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity">For <code>HD01CU25</code> (prison capacity)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu25-prison-capacity"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark's 2021 leased-capacity + Kosovo pilot is the most aggressive Nordic precedent; Finland's 2023 bill is closest in shape to CU25. Comparative risk signal: both neighbours faced procedural legal challenges before construction began — Sweden's planning-law carve-out pathway has to be evaluated against those experiences. [Source A2 om.fi / justitsministeriet.dk]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025">For <code>HD01FiU23</code> (Riksbank 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025">For <code>HD01FiU23</code> (Riksbank 2025)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01fiu23-riksbank-2025"></a></h4>
 <p>The Nordic / Eurozone central-bank recap framework precedents — Nationalbanken (DK, statutory reserve), Norges Bank (NO, petroleum-fund interaction), Bundesbank/DNB (EU, Eurosystem framework) — show the <strong>procedural separation</strong> between annual review and recapitalisation as standard practice. FiU should sequence accordingly. [Source A1 riksbank.se + comparator central-bank sites]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research">For <code>HD01SfU23</code> (migration / research)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research">For <code>HD01SfU23</code> (migration / research)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01sfu23-migration--research"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany, Netherlands all operate researcher fast-tracks. Sweden's SfU23 carve-out brings it into parity. The abuse-prevention framing is the Swedish-specific differentiator — Denmark's NyiDanmark enforcement model is the closest analogue. [Source A2 nyidanmark.dk]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging">For <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV home-charging)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging">For <code>HD01CU29</code> (EV home-charging)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-for-hd01cu29-ev-home-charging"></a></h4>
 <p>Finland's ARA subsidy and Norway's Enova schemes are the most mature Nordic comparators; both show that take-up concentrates in detached-housing demographics without multi-dwelling provisions — the regressivity concern in R7 of <code>risk-assessment.md</code> is replicated internationally. [Source A2 enova.no / ara.fi]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-diagram">Comparator diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-diagram">Comparator diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     SE[Sweden 2026] --- DK[Denmark]
     SE --- FI[Finland]
@@ -3031,25 +3031,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-diagram">Comparator diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style DE fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style NL fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style ILO fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b4d1f,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-19">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-19">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-19"></a></h3>
 <p>All ratification dates from ilo.org NORMLEX database [A1]; all comparator agencies cited above.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: historical-pattern analysis with ≥ 3 prior precedents; Admiralty-coded sources.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) on causal analogies.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014">Parallel 1 — Pre-election committee-report clustering (2022, 2018, 2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014">Parallel 1 — Pre-election committee-report clustering (2022, 2018, 2014)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-committee-report-clustering-2022-2018-2014"></a></h3>
 <p>Incumbent governments have historically front-loaded committee reports in the final spring before September elections. 2018 S+MP government tabled ≥ 5 signature committee reports in April-May; 2014 S-led opposition-constraining cluster in spring 2014; 2022 S government in April 2022. Base rate for pre-election cluster: ~ 80 % of incumbencies. [B2, riksdagen.se/kalender archives]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023">Parallel 2 — Kriminalvården capacity plans (2020, 2023)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023">Parallel 2 — Kriminalvården capacity plans (2020, 2023)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--kriminalvården-capacity-plans-2020-2023"></a></h3>
 <p>Two prior capacity-expansion plans (2020, 2023) — both missed original timelines by ≥ 15 % within 18 months (<a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> annual reports) [A2]. This is the base-rate input to KJ-2's 55 % slippage posterior on CU25. The 2023 plan additionally triggered two Riksrevisionen follow-up reviews (<a href="https://www.riksrevisionen.se/">riksrevisionen.se</a>) [A2].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020">Parallel 3 — Central-bank recapitalisation episodes (Sweden 2013, Denmark 2020)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020">Parallel 3 — Central-bank recapitalisation episodes (Sweden 2013, Denmark 2020)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--central-bank-recapitalisation-episodes-sweden-2013-denmark-2020"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden 2013 Riksbank profit-distribution reform occurred quietly without chamber debate — counter-example to our FiU23 recapitalisation-debate scenario, suggesting the ~ 45 % probability is in line with the base rate rather than above it. Denmark 2020 Nationalbanken statutory-reserve framework — closer parallel: the FiU comparator-reference point for a separate recap hearing. (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>, <a href="https://www.nationalbanken.dk/">nationalbanken.dk</a>) [A1].</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021">Parallel 4 — Migration-permit abuse-prevention / carve-out pairing (2014, 2017, 2021)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021">Parallel 4 — Migration-permit abuse-prevention / carve-out pairing (2014, 2017, 2021)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--migration-permit-abuse-prevention--carve-out-pairing-2014-2017-2021"></a></h3>
 <p>The pairing of tightening + specialist carve-out is a repeat pattern in Swedish migration legislation: 2014 S carve-out for IT/researchers; 2017 S-MP carve-out for doctoral candidates; 2021 S tightening with doctoral retention. [B2, riksdagen.se] SfU23 fits this pattern; risk that implementation ordinance narrows the carve-out in practice is empirically supported — 2014 carve-out was operationally narrowed within 12 months.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190">Parallel 5 — ILO convention ratification delays (C189, C183, C190)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190">Parallel 5 — ILO convention ratification delays (C189, C183, C190)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--ilo-convention-ratification-delays-c189-c183-c190"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden has a recurring pattern of ratifying ILO conventions several years after Nordic peers: C189 (domestic workers, 2011): Sweden 2019 vs DK 2014; C183 (maternity): Sweden 2020 vs DK 2013; C190 now 2026 vs DK 2022. Pattern is substantive-compatibility-review culture rather than neglect. [A1, ilo.org NORMLEX]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus">Parallel 6 — EV subsidy / distributive risk (2017 Elbilspremien, 2022 Klimatbonus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus">Parallel 6 — EV subsidy / distributive risk (2017 Elbilspremien, 2022 Klimatbonus)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--ev-subsidy--distributive-risk-2017-elbilspremien-2022-klimatbonus"></a></h3>
 <p>Both prior EV-subsidy regimes were critiqued as regressive by Riksrevisionen and S/V/MP opposition. Both were eventually re-scoped with income / housing-type caps. CU29's regressivity risk is historically reliably materialised. [A2, riksrevisionen.se]</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match">Mini-diagram of historical-parallel pattern match<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match">Mini-diagram of historical-parallel pattern match<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     P1[Pre-election clustering 2014, 2018, 2022] --> M1[2026-04-24 cluster]
     P2[Kriminalvården 2020, 2023 plans] --> M2[CU25 slippage risk]
@@ -3069,7 +3069,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mini-diagram-of-historical-parallel-pattern-match">Mini-diagram of hi
     style M4 fill:#c62828,stroke:#7f1010,color:#fff
     style M5 fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff
     style M6 fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#8c3a00,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-20">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-20">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-20"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/kalender</a> historical calendar archives [A1]</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a> annual reports 2020-2024 [A2]</li>
@@ -3078,10 +3078,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-20">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href=
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: agency-capacity assessment + risk-adjusted implementation scoring.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (B2) on agency-mandate; MEDIUM (C3) on capacity forecasts.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite">Feasibility matrix (0-100 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite">Feasibility matrix (0-100 composite)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3142,32 +3142,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix-0-100-composite">Feasibility matrix (0-100 composi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th align="center">Agency capacity</th><th align="center">Budget allocation</th><th align="center">Legal complexity</th><th align="center">Political alignment</th><th align="center">Timeline realism</th><th align="center">Composite</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>HD01CU25</code> prison capacity</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center"><strong>65</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01SfU23</code> migration/researchers</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">65</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center"><strong>63</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01FiU23</code> Riksbank</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">90</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center"><strong>86</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01AU15</code> ILO ratification</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">85</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center"><strong>80</strong></td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01CU29</code> EV home charging</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">70</td><td align="center">80</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center">75</td><td align="center"><strong>75</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical-path items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65">CU25 — Kriminalvården capacity expansion (composite 65)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-path-items">Critical-path items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-path-items"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65">CU25 — Kriminalvården capacity expansion (composite 65)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu25--kriminalvården-capacity-expansion-composite-65"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary constraint</strong>: capacity-absorption of + 8 500 platser requires sustained recruitment and procurement. Historical base rate: 85 % of such plans slip ≥ 10 %. [A2, kriminalvarden.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary constraint</strong>: planning-law carve-out faces municipal-level legal challenges (2014–2023 base rate: 3–5 challenges per large capacity project).</li>
 <li><strong>Key milestone</strong>: Q2 2026 capacity-status report.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63">SfU23 — Migration/researchers (composite 63)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63">SfU23 — Migration/researchers (composite 63)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sfu23--migrationresearchers-composite-63"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary constraint</strong>: Migrationsverket transformation programme — dependencies on Digg (<a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a>) [A2].</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary constraint</strong>: dual-track permit processing IT requires ordinance + system integration. Historical base rate: migration-system changes take 12–18 months to operationalise.</li>
 <li><strong>Key milestone</strong>: implementation ordinance (summer 2026) + Migrationsverket IT milestone (Q3 2026).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86">FiU23 — Riksbank 2025 review (composite 86)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86">FiU23 — Riksbank 2025 review (composite 86)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiu23--riksbank-2025-review-composite-86"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Standing review; no novel implementation workload. Recapitalisation decision (separate ordinance if needed) is the only contingent operational load.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80">AU15 — ILO ratification (composite 80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80">AU15 — ILO ratification (composite 80)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-au15--ilo-ratification-composite-80"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Diskrimineringslagen + Arbetsmiljölagen transposition straightforward. DO + AV implementation guidance cycle (<a href="https://www.do.se/">do.se</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>) [A2].</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75">CU29 — EV home-charging (composite 75)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75">CU29 — EV home-charging (composite 75)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cu29--ev-home-charging-composite-75"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Energimyndigheten (<a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a>) + Boverket (<a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>) implementation [A2]. Subsidy-rollout mechanics well-understood; regressivity mitigation requires separate ordinance.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-stress-diagram">Feasibility-stress diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-stress-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-stress-diagram">Feasibility-stress diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-stress-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     I[Cluster items]
     I --> CU25F[CU25 composite 65]
@@ -3191,25 +3191,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-stress-diagram">Feasibility-stress diagram<a class="" ari
     style R3 fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style R4 fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style R5 fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-21">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-21">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-21"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.kriminalvarden.se/">kriminalvarden.se</a>, <a href="https://www.migrationsverket.se/">migrationsverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>, <a href="https://www.do.se/">do.se</a>, <a href="https://www.av.se/">av.se</a>, <a href="https://www.energimyndigheten.se/">energimyndigheten.se</a>, <a href="https://www.boverket.se/">boverket.se</a>, <a href="https://www.digg.se/">digg.se</a> [A2]</li>
 <li><code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>, <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — Heuer methodology; Red-Team challenge.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (C3) — hypotheses test analytic robustness of the mainline reading.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster">H1 — Mainline: Coordinated pre-election signalling cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster">H1 — Mainline: Coordinated pre-election signalling cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--mainline-coordinated-pre-election-signalling-cluster"></a></h4>
 <p>The five-report tabling is a deliberate Tidö composition to front-load delivery signals ahead of Sep 2026.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence">H2 — Bureaucratic coincidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence">H2 — Bureaucratic coincidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--bureaucratic-coincidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The clustering is a mechanical consequence of the Riksdag calendar — betänkanden accumulate for chamber decision before summer recess; committee-chair scheduling is the driver, not strategic messaging.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3--defensive-scrambling">H3 — Defensive scrambling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--defensive-scrambling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3--defensive-scrambling">H3 — Defensive scrambling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--defensive-scrambling"></a></h4>
 <p>The cluster reflects Tidö anxiety about slipping delivery metrics; signature items are being rushed through committee to lock in a pre-election record before unfavourable data emerges.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement">H4 — Coalition-internal settlement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement">H4 — Coalition-internal settlement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--coalition-internal-settlement"></a></h4>
 <p>The composition is the output of intra-coalition horse-trading: SD got CU25 + SfU23 hard framing; L got SfU23 carve-out + AU15 ratification; M balances; KD neutralised on CU29 cost caution — each party gets enough to defend its vote.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Evidence mapped to consistency with each hypothesis (C = consistent, I = inconsistent, N = neutral, ? = ambiguous).</p>
 
 
@@ -3292,26 +3292,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <p><strong>Tally of inconsistent evidence</strong> (minimising is the ACH-preferred hypothesis): H1 = 1, H2 = 3, H3 = 1, H4 = 0.</p>
 <p><strong>Preferred hypothesis</strong>: H4 (coalition-internal settlement) shows zero inconsistencies but H1 (coordinated signalling) and H3 (defensive) are both well-supported. H1 and H4 are in fact <strong>compatible</strong> — strategic signalling and horse-trading are concurrent. H2 is weakest but cannot be dismissed because E4 + E6 support it.</p>
 <p><strong>Decision</strong>: present H1 as mainline, with explicit acknowledgement that H4 (horse-trading) is the likely intra-coalition mechanism. H3 is the <strong>downside scenario</strong> to monitor.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-Team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Claim we are most likely wrong about</strong>: the CU25 DIW of 85. Red team contends: (a) CU25 may be operationally blocked by local-council procedural challenges before construction starts, reducing actual impact despite high symbolic weight; (b) prior Kriminalvården capacity-plan misses (2020, 2023) suggest a base rate of under-delivery that should drag CU25's implementation-impact sub-score down; (c) if delivery is performative rather than operational, DIW may reflect attention-weight more than decision-weight.</p>
 <p><strong>Response</strong>: the DIW 85 score already integrates a 75 on institutional weight (moderate, not maximal) reflecting operational uncertainty, and an electoral-salience 95 captures the symbolic weight separately. The sensitivity band 78–88 in <code>significance-scoring.md</code> is consistent with the Red-Team concerns. We retain the mainline estimate but log this as a <strong>Priority-1 audit item</strong> for the +60 d Kriminalvården Q2 report.</p>
 <p><strong>Second challenge</strong>: SfU23 may be overrated as a coalition-stress driver (DIW 80, coalition-stress 85). Red team: L may not actually defect because the researcher carve-out already accommodates its preference; the "SD–L tension" narrative may be media framing more than institutional reality. <strong>Response</strong>: carve-out acceptance depends on ministerial ordinance scope, which is TBD — residual tension real but conditional. Retain current scoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-hypothesis-log">Rejected hypothesis log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypothesis-log"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-hypothesis-log">Rejected hypothesis log<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypothesis-log"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>H2 (bureaucratic coincidence)</strong>: retained as null hypothesis for methodology purposes only. Inconsistent with E1 (simultaneous signature + breadth mix) and E2 (three signature items > base rate).</li>
 <li><strong>Sub-hypothesis</strong>: "the cluster signals Tidö pivot away from S-type welfare agenda". Rejected — no evidence in tabled items supports a welfare pivot; AU15 is labour-protection and CU29 is distributive.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-22">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-22">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-22"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 [A1]</li>
 <li>regeringen.se communications trend [A2]</li>
 <li>Historical Riksdag calendar: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/kalender</a> [A1]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: 7-dimension classification from <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code>.
 <strong>Dimensions</strong>: (1) Policy domain, (2) Coalition alignment, (3) Salience, (4) Time-horizon, (5) Contestedness, (6) Institutional locus, (7) Classification (sensitivity).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3378,15 +3378,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th><code>dok_id</code></th><th>Policy domain</th><th>Coalition alignment</th><th align="center">Salience</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Contestedness</th><th>Institutional locus</th><th>Classification / retention</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>HD01CU25</code></td><td>Criminal justice / Housing &#x26; infrastructure (CU)</td><td>Tidö-led (M/KD/SD driving; L concurring)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Short–Medium (2026–2028 construction)</td><td>CONTESTED (S mixed; V/MP opposed on environmental shortcuts)</td><td>CU committee; Kriminalvården implementation</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 10 y; open access</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01SfU23</code></td><td>Migration / Research mobility (SfU)</td><td>Tidö-led (SD maximalist; L/M dual-track; KD pragmatic)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Short (implementation 2026–2027)</td><td>BIFURCATED (opposition supports researcher carve-out; opposes abuse-prevention broadness)</td><td>SfU committee; Migrationsverket + UHR implementation</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 10 y; open access</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01FiU23</code></td><td>Monetary / Institutional (FiU)</td><td>Cross-party (standing annual review)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Standing (annual)</td><td>MILD (V raises mandate questions; otherwise consensus)</td><td>FiU committee; Riksbank General Council</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 25 y; open access (monetary-policy sensitivity)</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01AU15</code></td><td>Labour / International (AU)</td><td>Broad cross-party</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Medium (ratification + transposition 2026–2027)</td><td>LOW (symbolic consensus)</td><td>AU committee; Arbetsmiljöverket + Diskrimineringsombudsmannen</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 25 y; open access</td></tr><tr><td><code>HD01CU29</code></td><td>Climate / Housing / Mobility (CU)</td><td>Broad (MP/C/L advocate; M/KD/SD concur; SD cost-caution)</td><td align="center">LOW–MEDIUM</td><td>Short (2026–2027 rollout)</td><td>LOW (consensus on direction, quibble on cost)</td><td>CU committee; Boverket + Energimyndigheten</td><td>PUBLIC; retention 10 y; open access</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing">Priority tiers (for publishing + downstream processing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing">Priority tiers (for publishing + downstream processing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers-for-publishing--downstream-processing"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>P0 (lead story)</strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code> — CU25 prison capacity.</li>
 <li><strong>P1 (secondary lead)</strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>P2 (breadth)</strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code>, <code>HD01CU29</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 <p>All five classified <strong>PUBLIC</strong> per Offentlighetsprincipen (Public Access to Information Act, Tryckfrihetsförordningen 2:1). No personal-data processing beyond named public officials in their public role — GDPR Art. 9 basis: 9(2)(e) publicly made + 9(2)(g) substantial public interest. Retention 10 y standard for legislative records; 25 y for monetary-policy and ILO-related records (constitutional / international treaty reference value).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-diagram">Classification diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-diagram">Classification diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     subgraph P0["P0 Lead"]
       CU25[HD01CU25&#x3C;br/>Prison capacity]
@@ -3412,36 +3412,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-diagram">Classification diagram<a class="" aria-hidden
     style Tidö fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style Inst fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#35094f,color:#fff
     style Cons fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0b3a6b,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-23">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-23"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-23">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-23"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_dokument</code> × 5 (A1), all at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/%7B%7Bdok_id%7D%7D">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{{dok_id}}</a></li>
 <li>Tryckfrihetsförordningen 2 kap 1 § — <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/TF</a> (A1)</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: map policy clusters, legislative chains, coordinated-activity patterns, and sibling-folder references across the five tabled reports.
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH on direct committee + legislative chains (A1); MEDIUM on cluster inference (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery">Cluster 1 — Law-and-order delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery">Cluster 1 — Law-and-order delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-1--law-and-order-delivery"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01CU25</code> (prison capacity), with narrative tie to earlier 2024/25 criminal-justice legislation.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: CU25 descends from 2023 Tidöavtal priority on <code>straffrättslig reform + kapacitetsutbyggnad</code> (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/tidoavtalet</a> [A2]); connects forward to pending 2026 Q3 Kriminalvården capital-expenditure proposition.
 <strong>Coordinated activity</strong>: Pre-debate CU25 + SfU23 pairing in plenary is the documented pattern from prior Tidö sessions (2024 motsvarande cluster on criminal-justice + migration).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out">Cluster 2 — Migration enforcement + competitiveness carve-out<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out">Cluster 2 — Migration enforcement + competitiveness carve-out<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-2--migration-enforcement--competitiveness-carve-out"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01SfU23</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Descends from 2024 SfU permit-tightening legislation (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/voteringar</a> previous SfU votes [A1]); anchors forward to pending 2026 Migrationsverket budget (BP 2026/27).
 <strong>Sibling folders</strong>: <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> (migration-related pending propositions may intersect); <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/motions/</code> (opposition motions on researcher mobility).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship">Cluster 3 — Monetary / institutional stewardship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship">Cluster 3 — Monetary / institutional stewardship<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-3--monetary--institutional-stewardship"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01FiU23</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Standing annual review per Sveriges Riksbankslag (2022:1568) (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se/SFS</a> [A1]); FiU23 follows 2024/25 HD01FiU23 predecessor.
 <strong>Forward tie</strong>: 2026 Q2 Riksbank penningpolitisk rapport (<a href="https://www.riksbank.se/">riksbank.se</a>); potential 2026 Q3 recapitalisation ordinance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance">Cluster 4 — International labour compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance">Cluster 4 — International labour compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-4--international-labour-compliance"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01AU15</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Descends from Regeringens skrivelse on ILO ratifications (standing periodic cycle); forward-ties to 2026–27 Arbetsmiljöverket + Diskrimineringsombudsmannen guidance updates.
 <strong>Sibling activity</strong>: 2026-04-14 AU propositions on workplace-safety modernisation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition">Cluster 5 — Climate-mobility transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition">Cluster 5 — Climate-mobility transition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-5--climate-mobility-transition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Members</strong>: <code>HD01CU29</code>.
 <strong>Legislative chain</strong>: Descends from Klimatpolitiska handlingsplanen 2023–24 commitments (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se/klimatpolitiska-handlingsplanen</a> [A2]); forward-ties to Boverket charging-infrastructure BBR updates.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix">Cross-cluster coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix">Cross-cluster coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3496,7 +3496,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-cluster-coordination-matrix">Cross-cluster coordination matrix<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th align="center">CU25</th><th align="center">SfU23</th><th align="center">FiU23</th><th align="center">AU15</th><th align="center">CU29</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>CU25</strong></td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">Shared Tidö signal day; joint floor debate likely</td><td align="center">Indirect (fiscal envelope linkage)</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">Indirect (CU committee shared)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>SfU23</strong></td><td align="center">Joint floor debate likely</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">Indirect (MV budget linkage)</td><td align="center">Indirect (labour-mobility angle)</td><td align="center">None</td></tr><tr><td><strong>FiU23</strong></td><td align="center">Indirect (fiscal)</td><td align="center">Indirect (MV budget)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">None</td></tr><tr><td><strong>AU15</strong></td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">Labour-mobility overlap</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">None</td></tr><tr><td><strong>CU29</strong></td><td align="center">CU committee shared</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">None</td><td align="center">—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains-diagram">Legislative chains diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains-diagram">Legislative chains diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     T[Tidöavtal 2022] --> P23[2023 CJ priorities]
     P23 --> CU25[HD01CU25]
@@ -3520,20 +3520,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chains-diagram">Legislative chains diagram<a class="" ari
     style RecapOrd fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style AVGuid fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff
     style BBR fill:#212121,stroke:#000,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-cross-references">Sibling-folder cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-cross-references">Sibling-folder cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/</code> — predecessor committee-report cluster; compare DIW ranking drift.</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/</code> — opposition motions that may cross-reference CU25 / SfU23 via amendment text.</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/propositions/</code> — proposition source material for CU25 / SfU23 (if applicable).</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-21/monthly-review/</code> — monthly frame anchoring, for comparative positioning.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-24">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-24">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-24"></a></h3>
 <p>All cluster references cite <code>dok_id</code> + primary URL on data.riksdagen.se, regeringen.se, riksbank.se, or riksdagen.se/SFS (constitutional text).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: run-audit gate per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Methodology Reflection</code>.
 <strong>Standards audited</strong>: ICD 203 (9 analytic standards), Admiralty Code, WEP/Kent confidence, OSINT tradecraft ethics, DIW weighting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-1-evidence-sufficiency">1. Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-evidence-sufficiency">1. Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 5 attested <code>dok_id</code> sourced via <code>get_dokument</code> (A1).</li>
 <li>Implementing agency coverage: Kriminalvården, Migrationsverket, Riksbank, Arbetsmiljöverket, DO, Boverket, Energimyndigheten — all with primary-source URLs (A1–A2).</li>
@@ -3541,7 +3541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-1-evidence-sufficiency">1. Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidde
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: full text of the 5 reports not fetched in this run (titles + metadata only). Mitigated by committee-calendar and Tidöavtal trajectory knowledge; flagged as limitation.</li>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: current polling data not integrated. Mitigated by structural analysis; flagged as PIR-6 + PIR-7 for cross-session-intelligence in next aggregation cycle.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-2-confidence-distribution">2. Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-2-confidence-distribution">2. Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3579,7 +3579,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-2-confidence-distribution">2. Confidence distribution<a class="" aria
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Level</th><th align="center">Count</th><th align="center">Share</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0 %</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">57 %</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">43 %</td></tr><tr><td>LOW</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0 %</td></tr><tr><td>VERY LOW</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0 %</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>HIGH:MEDIUM ratio (4:3) is calibrated — absence of VERY HIGH reflects that no judgments are derived from settled ground truth (election has not happened; Q2 reports not yet published). Absence of LOW reflects that judgments for which we lacked evidence were instead flagged as <strong>assumptions</strong> in §Key Assumptions Check (A1–A5), not promoted to judgments.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-3-source-diversity">3. Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-source-diversity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-source-diversity">3. Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-source-diversity"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Parliamentary primary</strong>: data.riksdagen.se, riksdagen.se (A1)</li>
 <li><strong>Government primary</strong>: regeringen.se (A2)</li>
@@ -3589,7 +3589,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-3-source-diversity">3. Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Comparator primary</strong>: justitsministeriet.dk, om.fi, kriminalomsorgen.no, bmas.de, rijksoverheid.nl and central-bank sites (A1–A2)</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Diversity satisfies <strong>Source Diversity Rule</strong>: every P0/P1 claim (KJ-1, KJ-2, KJ-3, KJ-4, KJ-7) cites ≥ 3 independent sources across categories.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic">4. Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic">4. Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 <p>SWOT + stakeholder + scenario analysis applied evenly across parties:</p>
 
 
@@ -3652,7 +3652,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-4-party-neutrality-arithmetic">4. Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Positive references</th><th align="center">Negative references</th><th align="center">Net</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+3</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">−1</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+1</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">−1</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">+1</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">+2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Variance is ≤ ±3 for all parties — within neutrality tolerance (tolerance threshold: ≤ ±5 per <code>political-style-guide.md</code>). No party exceeds ±5. SD's mildly negative score reflects its own hardline positions on CU25 / SfU23 being flagged as coalition-stress factors, not analyst bias.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-5-icd-203-audit">5. ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-icd-203-audit">5. ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3710,7 +3710,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-icd-203-audit">5. ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabin
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 standard</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Describes quality and reliability of underlying sources</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Admiralty codes on every evidence row</td></tr><tr><td>2. Properly caveats and expresses uncertainties</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Confidence labels on all KJs + §Key Assumptions Check</td></tr><tr><td>3. Properly distinguishes analyst judgments from facts</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>"We assess…" language vs. source-cited facts</td></tr><tr><td>4. Incorporates alternative analyses (ACH/Red Team)</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>devils-advocate.md</code> H1–H4 + Red Team</td></tr><tr><td>5. Demonstrates customer relevance</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>§"3 Decisions This Brief Supports" in <code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>6. Uses clear and logical argumentation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Mainline → evidence → confidence structure</td></tr><tr><td>7. Explains change to or consistency of judgments</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Anchored against 2024/25 SfU tightening trajectory + 2022 Tidöavtal</td></tr><tr><td>8. Makes accurate judgments and assessments</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>Will be audited at +60 d Kriminalvården report (PIR-1)</td></tr><tr><td>9. Incorporates visualisations where appropriate</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>12+ Mermaid diagrams across artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Standard 8 is retrospective — marked as action item in §Methodology Improvements.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-sat-technique-attestation">6. SAT technique attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-sat-technique-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-sat-technique-attestation">6. SAT technique attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-sat-technique-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>Structured Analytic Techniques used in this run:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</strong> — <code>devils-advocate.md</code> §ACH matrix</li>
@@ -3726,7 +3726,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-sat-technique-attestation">6. SAT technique attestation<a class=""
 <li><strong>PESTLE-adjacent 5-dimension risk register</strong> — <code>risk-assessment.md</code></li>
 </ol>
 <p>11 distinct SATs applied; meets the ≥ 10 threshold in <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance">7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance">7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All data from Offentlighetsprincipen / public-data MCPs.</li>
 <li>Named actors are public officials or party groups in their public capacity. No private personal data.</li>
@@ -3734,7 +3734,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-gdpr--osint-ethics-compliance">7. GDPR / OSINT ethics compliance<a
 <li>No voter-level or psychographic inference beyond aggregate party positioning.</li>
 <li>No third-party data sources; no scraping; no leaked/hacked material.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">8. Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">8. Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Pre-fetch full text</strong> for at least the P0 and P1 committee reports (<code>HD01CU25</code>, <code>HD01SfU23</code>, <code>HD01FiU23</code>) by using <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> with <code>include_full_text: true</code> in the download pipeline. This will let per-document analyses cite specific paragraphs rather than inferring from titles.</li>
 <li><strong>Integrate Riksdag voting history on predecessor items</strong> via <code>get_voteringar</code> — e.g. pull the prior year's corresponding bet votes to quantify coalition-stress baseline for KJ-3. Add a <code>prior-votes-context.json</code> enrichment step.</li>
@@ -3742,17 +3742,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-8-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">8. Methodology Improvement
 <li><strong>Test H3 (defensive scrambling) hypothesis explicitly</strong> at +60 d by comparing the Kriminalvården Q2 capacity figure against the CU25 implied baseline. If deviation ≥ 10 %, update hypothesis weighting.</li>
 <li><strong>Add comparator-side prison-capacity and migration-permit metrics</strong> as structured JSON (<code>comparator-metrics.json</code>) so future Outside-In analyses can quantitatively compare rather than narratively compare.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-9-limitations">9. Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-limitations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-9-limitations">9. Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-9-limitations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text of committee reports not fetched this run (title + metadata only).</li>
 <li>Polling data not integrated (relies on published 2025 Q4 / 2026 Q1 baselines).</li>
 <li>Implementation-agency status reports for Q1 2026 not all available yet; some inference on capacity trajectory.</li>
 <li>Comparative analysis depth varies by comparator (DK / FI deepest; DE / NL lighter).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-25">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-25">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-25"></a></h3>
 <p>This reflection cites: <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code>, <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code>, <code>political-style-guide.md</code>, and all 15 other artifacts in this folder.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-24 01:06 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_betankanden, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 50
@@ -3766,7 +3766,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -3776,9 +3776,40 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <p>All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-23 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01AU15-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU29-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01FiU23-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SfU23-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3833,7 +3864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:11.268Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:32.814Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html b/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html
index 146b7befb5..ef2b16d1a3 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.481Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.033Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.481Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.033Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill","description":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill pre-election delivery package (EU Banking Package HD03253, detainee benefit restriction HD03252, tachograph enforcement HD03256,…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:11.481Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill","description":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill pre-election delivery package (EU Banking Package HD03253, detainee benefit restriction HD03252, tachograph enforcement HD03256,…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:33.033Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a <strong>four-bill pre-election delivery package</strong> (EU Banking Package HD03253, detainee benefit restriction HD03252, tachograph enforcement HD03256, debt-management review HD03104) while the Riksdag received <strong>five committee reports</strong> (CU25 prison capacity, SfU23 migration bifurcation, FiU23 Riksbank review, AU15 ILO, CU29 EV charging) and fielded <strong>16 opposition interpellations</strong> (12 filed by S). In the preceding 72 hours the opposition filed <strong>20 counter-motions</strong> against 9 propositions, with SD filing <strong>zero</strong>. The integrated picture is of a coalition executing a <strong>tightly synchronised pre-election legacy sprint</strong> with SD maintaining full Tidö discipline, while S concentrates attacks on economic wedges (drivmedel, SME sick-pay) and V/MP hold the civil-liberty and foreign-policy flanks. Admiralty <strong>A1</strong> on document identity and filings; <strong>B2</strong> on strategic interpretation. <strong>ICD 203 compliant</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong> — evening story leads with the <em>pre-election legacy sprint</em> frame (KJ-1), not with any single dok_id, because the cross-type pattern is the story.</li>
 <li><strong>Forward-watch prioritisation</strong> — FiU calendar for HD03253/HD01FiU23 and JuU calendar for HD03252 are the next 14-day pressure points (IT-1…IT-3, see <code>forward-indicators.md</code>).</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition stability signal</strong> — SD's zero motions against 9 props confirms the Tidö bloc is structurally intact through summer recess; L's absence from lead ministry roles persists (see <code>coalition-mathematics.md §Intra-coalition load</code>).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Volume</strong>: 4 props + 5 betänkanden + 20 motions + 16 interpellations = <strong>45 active Riksdag documents</strong> in the 24-April cycle window.</li>
 <li><strong>Lead story</strong>: Pre-election legacy sprint — Kristersson government converting Tidö agenda into visible enforcement ahead of September 2026.</li>
@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>V/MP signal</strong>: Own civil-liberty (HD024091, HD024096) and foreign-policy (MP krigsmateriel ban) cleavages — creates narrow but durable left-bloc wedge.</li>
 <li><strong>C signal</strong>: Motions on 5 bills with <em>procedural tightening</em> framing — positioning for bourgeois-curious voters.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger-72-h">🔮 Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h">🔮 Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>FT-1 · 2026-04-27 (FiU committee calendar)</strong>: First FiU hearing on HD03253 EU Banking Package will reveal committee timetable for summer-recess enactment. A delay beyond May would signal EU transposition risk (→ scenario S3 in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--key-decisions-matrix">📊 Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-decisions-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">📊 Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decisions-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -272,21 +272,21 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-decisions-matrix">📊 Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Owner</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Deadline</th><th>Downstream</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead HD03253 story framing</td><td>Editorial</td><td>FiU hearing published</td><td>2026-04-27</td><td>Lede + 72h forward watch</td></tr><tr><td>Prep HD03252 civil-liberty angle</td><td>Editorial</td><td>ECtHR precedent research</td><td>2026-05-01</td><td>Wedge story + ECHR context</td></tr><tr><td>Forward-watch HD03252 enactment</td><td>Editorial</td><td>Riksdag vote ≥ 1 Aug 2026</td><td>2026-08-01</td><td>Fact-based follow-up</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Tier 1 (systemic)</strong>: HD03253 transposition delay → EU infringement exposure; HD01FiU23 Riksbank independence debate.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier 2 (political)</strong>: HD03252 ECHR/ECtHR rights challenge; drivmedel climate framing by S/V/MP.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier 3 (operational)</strong>: HD03256 enforcement capacity; HD01CU25 prison-capacity slip ≥ 10% would invert coalition crime narrative.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence base</strong>: 19 primary-source Riksdag documents + cross-type patterns from 4 sibling folders. Single-source dependency mitigated by cross-validation with <code>sibling executive-brief.md</code>s and stakeholder role-verification. See <code>methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 compliance audit</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence--assumptions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--assumptions"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH (A1)</strong>: Document identity, filings, party attribution, committee routing.</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM (B2)</strong>: Pre-election-sprint narrative framing (strategic interpretation).</li>
 <li><strong>LOW (C3)</strong>: Specific RWA impact magnitudes on Handelsbanken/SEB (QIS not yet published).</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Key assumption (flagged for next-cycle check per <code>methodology-reflection.md</code>)</strong>: That the Tidö coalition's summer-recess timetable holds — if a coalition crisis emerges (e.g. L–KD on HD03252 proportionality), the sprint collapses into autumn, reshaping the election framing.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--companion-files"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-companion-files"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md">synthesis-summary.md</a> — integrated picture</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md">intelligence-assessment.md</a> — Key Judgments + PIRs (ICD-203)</li>
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a> — run-audit + ICD 203 compliance</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The Kristersson government on 2026-04-24 simultaneously advanced a <strong>four-bill legislative package</strong> (detainee benefits, EU banking, tachograph enforcement, debt review), received <strong>five committee reports</strong> clustering its Tidö pre-election signals (prisons, migration, Riksbank, ILO, EV), and fielded <strong>16 opposition interpellations</strong> — while SD filed <strong>zero counter-motions</strong> against any of the 9 open government bills. This is the profile of a coalition entering <strong>pre-election delivery mode</strong> roughly 16 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election, with the SD party-of-confidence remaining structurally disciplined and S concentrating opposition firepower on economic wedges rather than identity politics.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (cross-type, top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (cross-type, top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -409,8 +409,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (cross-t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>DIW</th><th>Theme</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Source folder</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03253</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.80</td><td>EU Banking Package (CRR3/CRD6) — systemic-fiscal</td><td>B2</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.80</td><td>Detainee benefit restriction — civil-liberty / ECtHR</td><td>A2</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10447</td><td>Ip</td><td>3.85</td><td>SME sick-pay reimbursement — S economic wedge</td><td>A2</td><td>interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.50</td><td>Prison capacity expansion — delivery-risk</td><td>A1</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Motion</td><td>3.45</td><td>S drivmedel counter-motion (prop 236) — climate wedge</td><td>A1</td><td>motions</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01SfU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.40</td><td>Migration bifurcation (study/research) — coalition-tension</td><td>B2</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01FiU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.40</td><td>Riksbank annual review — monetary institutional</td><td>A2</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03256</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.20</td><td>Tachograph enforcement — transport-industry</td><td>A1</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024096</td><td>Motion</td><td>3.00</td><td>MP krigsmateriel export ban — foreign-policy wedge</td><td>A1</td><td>motions</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03104</td><td>Skr</td><td>2.80</td><td>5-year debt-management evaluation — fiscal credibility</td><td>A1</td><td>propositions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Ranking robust under ±1 DIW tier perturbation. HD03253 and HD03252 remain co-leaders under any sensible re-weighting because both carry systemic-grade exposure (one fiscal, one rights-based).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence">Thematic convergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-thematic-convergence">Thematic convergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence"></a></h4>
 <p>Today's 45 active documents cluster into <strong>four coherent narrative threads</strong> that together describe the Tidö coalition's final pre-election positioning:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Coercive-authority expansion</strong> — HD03252 (detainee benefits), HD03256 (tachograph enforcement), HD01CU25 (prison capacity). All three raise the <strong>visible-enforcement</strong> profile ahead of September 2026. Effective dates are front-loaded: HD03256 (1 Jul 2026), HD03252 (1 Aug 2026), HD01CU25 capacity milestones (Q2–Q3 2026).</li>
@@ -418,13 +418,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence">Thematic convergence<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>Migration and labour</strong> — HD01SfU23 (study/research permit bifurcation), HD01AU15 (ILO ratification). The coalition is threading a needle — tightening on irregular migration while loosening on highly-skilled arrivals. Bifurcation is a concession to M's business-vote flank over SD's closed-border preference.</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition counter-choreography</strong> — 20 motions concentrated on drivmedel (FiU), utvisning (SfU), and krigsmateriel (UU); 16 interpellations 75% S-filed. The opposition is running a <em>three-party division-of-labour</em> — S holds the economic centre, V holds the rights-flank, MP holds foreign policy — with C on procedural tightening only.</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Prop → Motion → Committee → Interpellation pipeline</strong> is unusually complete today: HD03252 (prop) will generate JuU counter-motion(s) by 8 May, then the JuU betänkande, then interpellation debate. The full legislative arc is visible.</li>
 <li><strong>SD silence</strong> is the single most structurally revealing signal. Zero motions against 9 props means SD will vote the Tidö line on all current bills — closing the right-flank escape route for opposition messaging.</li>
 <li><strong>S economic-wedge concentration</strong> (drivmedel + sick-pay + Riksbank critique) signals S has decided the 2026 campaign will be fought on <em>cost of living and SME resilience</em> rather than migration or identity.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture">Mermaid — cross-type narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture">Mermaid — cross-type narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   subgraph Gov["Kristersson government (M-KD-L + SD CPA)"]
     direction TB
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture">Mermaid — cross-type na
   classDef consensus fill:#8ac926,stroke:#8ac926,color:#0a0e27
   classDef opp fill:#6a4c93,stroke:#6a4c93,color:#fff
   classDef outcome fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EN headline (72 chars)</strong>: "Tidö's pre-election sprint: banks, prisons, detainees, and SD silence"</li>
 <li><strong>SV headline (74 chars)</strong>: "Tidöregeringens valspurt: banker, fängelser, häkten — och SD:s tystnad"</li>
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>SV meta description (158 chars)</strong>: "Regeringen driver fyra propositioner och fem betänkanden; oppositionen lämnar 20 motioner på 72 timmar — SD noll. Kvällsanalys av valspurtens politiska arkitektur."</li>
 <li><strong>Primary keywords</strong>: Tidöavtalet, Riksdagen 2026, EU bankpaket CRR3, säkerhetsförvaring, drivmedelsskatt, Patrik Lundqvist, Ulf Kristersson, Niklas Wykman, Gunnar Strömmer, SD-disciplin, valet 2026.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH (A1)</strong>: Document identity, authors, effective dates, filings, committee routing, SD zero-count.</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM (B2)</strong>: Pre-election-sprint narrative (SAT used: <strong>Key Assumptions Check</strong> + <strong>Red-Team challenge</strong> in <code>devils-advocate.md</code>).</li>
@@ -477,42 +477,41 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" ari
 <li>PIR-2: Will any L minister publicly dissent on HD03252 proportionality before 2026-05-31?</li>
 <li>PIR-3: Will S escalate HD10447 to a motion/budget amendment after Busch's 2026-05-07 answer?</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-summary">Tradecraft summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-summary">Tradecraft summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>ICD 203</strong> applied: sources characterised, confidence labelled, alternative hypotheses entertained (<code>devils-advocate.md</code>), key assumptions identified (<code>methodology-reflection.md</code>).</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty 6×6</strong>: every evidence row annotated; source diversity ≥ 3 for P0/P1 claims (cross-validated across sibling folders).</li>
 <li><strong>SATs invoked</strong>: ACH (in <code>devils-advocate.md</code>), Red-Team (scenario S4 in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>), Key Assumptions Check, Outside-In (<code>comparative-international.md</code>).</li>
 <li><strong>Neutrality arithmetic</strong>: Each of the 8 parties is named and treated by observable action — Regeringspartier (M, KD, L) as bill-drivers, SD by its zero motions, S/V/MP/C by their filed motions and interpellations.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions|motions|committeeReports|interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</code> + <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> + <code>executive-brief.md</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Classification</strong>: Public OSINT · <strong>ICD 203 compliant</strong>
 <strong>Confidence framework</strong>: VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / VERY LOW (5-level Admiralty-aligned)
 <strong>Tradecraft</strong>: ICD 203 Standards 1–9; Kent Scale (WEP); SATs (ACH, Red Team, Key Assumptions Check)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic">KJ-1 — Pre-election legacy sprint is the dominant organizing logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic">KJ-1 — Pre-election legacy sprint is the dominant organizing logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH (B2)</strong></p>
 <p>The simultaneous tabling of four propositions (HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104), landing of five committee reports (HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29), and absorption of 16 opposition interpellations on a single reporting day is <strong>highly likely</strong> a coordinated pre-election positioning sprint rather than a coincidence of the Riksdag calendar. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) all four propositions signed personally by PM Kristersson; (b) hard effective dates front-loaded into summer 2026 (1 Jul — HD03256; 1 Aug — HD03252); (c) Finance Minister Wykman leads two of four bills, concentrating fiscal-credibility messaging; (d) Tidöavtalet framing explicitly present in committee-report clustering (CU25 prisons + SfU23 migration). <strong>Alternative considered</strong> (<code>devils-advocate.md</code> H1): random calendar clustering — rejected because the effective-date alignment to September 2026 election cycle is too structurally precise for chance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact">KJ-2 — SD party-of-confidence discipline is structurally intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact">KJ-2 — SD party-of-confidence discipline is structurally intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: VERY HIGH (A1)</strong></p>
 <p>SD filed <strong>zero</strong> counter-motions against any of the nine active government propositions in the 72-hour filing window (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17). This is <strong>highly likely</strong> (Kent Scale: ≥ 85%) a signal that SD will vote the Tidö line on all current bills through summer recess. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) primary-source count from riksdagen.se motion index — A1; (b) consistent with SD's pattern since Tidöavtalet (2022): fewer than 5 counter-motions against government bills across the 2022–2026 mandate; (c) no public SD parliamentary-group dissent recorded in the past 30 days. <strong>Forward linkage</strong>: PIR-4 monitors SD on HD03252 proportionality debate in JuU — a late dissent would force immediate KJ revision.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign">KJ-3 — S has decided the 2026 campaign is an economic campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign">KJ-3 — S has decided the 2026 campaign is an economic campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH (B2)</strong></p>
 <p>Filing 12 of 16 interpellations (75%) in the HD10428–HD10447 window and leading the drivmedel counter-motion (HD024082) while <strong>not</strong> filing on krigsmateriel (MP-only, HD024096) is <strong>likely</strong> (Kent Scale: 55–70%) evidence that S's pre-election war-planning has pivoted away from migration/identity politics toward <strong>cost of living, SME resilience, and fiscal critique</strong>. <strong>Indicators</strong>: HD10447 lead dok explicitly reopens the 2024 sick-pay reimbursement decision; S motions cluster in FiU (fiscal) rather than JuU (justice). <strong>Alternative considered</strong>: S is splitting the issue-space with V/MP (division of labour rather than genuine pivot) — partially true but not mutually exclusive with the primary judgment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk">KJ-4 — HD03253 (EU Banking) carries the highest latent transposition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk">KJ-4 — HD03253 (EU Banking) carries the highest latent transposition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Possible</strong> (Kent Scale: 30–45%) that Sweden misses the CRR3/CRD6 transposition deadline if FiU does not schedule first hearing by 2026-05-15 (PIR-1). <strong>Indicators</strong>: EU deadline pressure; Swedish big-4 bank RWA concerns slow political process; QIS studies not yet published by Finansinspektionen. Mitigating factors: Wykman is a technocratic finance minister with EU-law experience; FiU's 2026 agenda has bandwidth after summer recess. <strong>See</strong> <code>scenario-analysis.md §Scenario S3</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk">KJ-5 — HD03252 (detainee benefits) carries the highest rights-litigation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk">KJ-5 — HD03252 (detainee benefits) carries the highest rights-litigation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Likely</strong> (Kent Scale: 55–70%) that HD03252 will face an ECHR Article 3 / Article 8 challenge within 18 months of entry into force (1 Aug 2026). <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) ECtHR case law on detainee conditions (e.g. <em>Khlaifia v. Italy</em>, <em>Muršić v. Croatia</em>) establishes a low threshold for collective rights restrictions; (b) V filed HD024095 seeking full avslag on a related utvisning bill — signalling a ready legal-advocacy ecosystem; (c) absence of a formal Justitieombudsmannen pre-assessment. <strong>Not alternative to KJ-1</strong>: an ECtHR challenge would not necessarily derail the bill's enactment; it would reshape the 2027+ political framing.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate">KJ-6 — L (Liberals) has structurally exited the lead ministry pool for the remainder of the mandate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate">KJ-6 — L (Liberals) has structurally exited the lead ministry pool for the remainder of the mandate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH (B2)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Likely</strong> (Kent Scale: 55–70%) that L will not regain a lead ministerial role on any new Tidö bill before September 2026. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) today's 4-bill batch has zero L-lead ministers; (b) L has held fewer lead roles each quarter since the 2024–25 coalition strain over criminal-justice proportionality; (c) L's internal polling pressure on civil liberty flank (including HD03252). <strong>Implication</strong>: L will seek differentiation via constitutional-committee work rather than ministerial delivery — shifts where pre-election dissent will appear.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy">KJ-7 — The Riksbank independence debate has re-emerged as a sleeper controversy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy">KJ-7 — The Riksbank independence debate has re-emerged as a sleeper controversy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Possible</strong> (Kent Scale: 30–45%) that HD01FiU23 (Riksbank annual review) will escalate into a public debate on Riksbank independence after 2024–25 balance-sheet losses. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) the 2022 Sveriges Riksbank Act overhaul is still within its first-five-years review window; (b) SD has previously expressed interest in political oversight of Riksbank; (c) FiU23 is a standing annual review but the 2026 iteration has unusually thick pre-reading bandwidth. This is the most latent, but highest-optionality, institutional risk in the set.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -550,7 +549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Confidence</th><th>Count</th><th>KJ IDs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VERY HIGH (A1)</td><td>1</td><td>KJ-2</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH (B2)</td><td>3</td><td>KJ-1, KJ-3, KJ-6</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM (C3)</td><td>3</td><td>KJ-4, KJ-5, KJ-7</td></tr><tr><td>LOW</td><td>0</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>VERY LOW</td><td>0</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Source diversity check</strong> (ICD 203 Standard 2): every KJ cites ≥ 2 independent sources (sibling folder corroboration + primary Riksdag document). Single-source dependencies flagged in individual KJs are candidates for next-cycle PIR follow-up.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pirs-for-next-cycle">PIRs for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pirs-for-next-cycle">PIRs for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -619,7 +618,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pirs-for-next-cycle">PIRs for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>Standing PIR-B</strong>: Election-cycle wedge escalations (any party escalating beyond normal parliamentary tools)</li>
 <li><strong>Standing PIR-C</strong>: ECHR / ECtHR filings against Swedish law</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-cycle PIR ingestion (Tier-C requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-cycle PIR ingestion (Tier-C requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h3>
 <p>Carried forward from sibling folders' intelligence-assessments (2026-04-24 morning runs):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Open PIR from propositions (prior cycle)</strong>: Will Wykman publish CRR3 QIS before 2026-05-15? → rolled into <strong>PIR-1</strong> above.</li>
@@ -629,7 +628,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-cycle PIR ingesti
 <li><strong>Previous PIR (from 2026-04-23 monthly-review)</strong>: Budget-recess legislative queue health → <strong>resolved</strong> (today's 4-bill batch indicates healthy queue).</li>
 </ul>
 <p>All inherited PIRs have been incorporated; no orphan PIRs from the 7-day lookback window remain unaddressed.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3">Key Assumptions Check (ICD 203 Standard 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3">Key Assumptions Check (ICD 203 Standard 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -672,7 +671,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3">Key Assumptions Check (ICD
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Assumption</th><th>Evidence strength</th><th>Fragility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Tidö coalition holds through summer recess</td><td>HIGH — SD zero motions + no public ministerial dissent</td><td>MEDIUM — L could break on HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>September 2026 election date is firm</td><td>VERY HIGH — constitutional</td><td>VERY LOW — requires mandate interruption</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Sibling folder analyses are accurate</td><td>HIGH — primary-source-based, cross-validated</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Opposition inter-party coordination is real (S+V+MP on drivmedel)</td><td>MEDIUM — three motions filed within 72h window</td><td>MEDIUM — may be independent convergence</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Kriminalvården can scale capacity per plan</td><td>LOW — history of capacity slippage</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2">Source characterisation (ICD 203 Standard 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2">Source characterisation (ICD 203 Standard 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary (A1)</strong>: Riksdag open data (data.riksdagen.se) — definitive for document identity and filings</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary (A1–A2)</strong>: Regeringen pressroom (regeringen.se) — definitive for ministerial signings</li>
@@ -680,7 +679,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2">Source characterisation (
 <li><strong>Quaternary (C3)</strong>: Market/legal analysis (RWA impact, ECtHR probability) — moderate-reliability inference</li>
 </ul>
 <p>No single-source-of-concern dependency (ICD 203 Standard 4 satisfied).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-standards-checklist">ICD 203 Standards checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-standards-checklist"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-standards-checklist">ICD 203 Standards checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-standards-checklist"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -737,12 +736,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-standards-checklist">ICD 203 Standards checklist<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Standard</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Objective</td><td>✅ No partisan framing; party-neutrality arithmetic in <code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Independent of political considerations</td><td>✅ Judgments cite observable actions, not preferences</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Timely</td><td>✅ All judgments tied to dated triggers (PIR deadlines)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>All available sources</td><td>✅ 4 sibling folders + MCP live check + cached IMF/SCB context</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Implements analytic tradecraft standards</td><td>✅ Admiralty, WEP, SATs explicitly invoked</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Properly describes quality and credibility</td><td>✅ Admiralty code on every claim</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Properly expresses uncertainty</td><td>✅ Kent Scale + VERY HIGH/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/VERY LOW</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Distinguishes assumptions from judgments</td><td>✅ Key Assumptions Check table above</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Incorporates alternative analysis</td><td>✅ <code>devils-advocate.md</code> with 3 competing hypotheses</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling intelligence-assessments; ICD 203 framework per <code>analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Framework</strong>: DIW (Decision-Information-Worth) weighting per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 4</code>
 <strong>Scale</strong>: 1.0 (Surface / L1) → 4.0 (Intelligence-grade / L3). Weights combine salience × novelty × downstream-dependency × uncertainty-reduction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type">DIW scores per document (top 20, cross-type)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type">DIW scores per document (top 20, cross-type)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1022,7 +1020,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type">DIW scores per document (t
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>DIW</th><th>Salience</th><th>Novelty</th><th>Dependency</th><th>Unc-reduction</th><th>Tier</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03253</td><td>Prop</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>3.80</strong></td><td>4.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>L3</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Prop</td><td>JuU</td><td><strong>3.80</strong></td><td>4.0</td><td>3.8</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.6</td><td>L3</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10447</td><td>Ip</td><td>NU</td><td><strong>3.85</strong></td><td>3.5</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>L3</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td><strong>3.50</strong></td><td>3.8</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.8</td><td>3.2</td><td>L2+</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>3.45</strong></td><td>3.8</td><td>3.2</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2+</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01SfU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>3.40</strong></td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2+</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01FiU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>3.40</strong></td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>L2+</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03256</td><td>Prop</td><td>TU</td><td><strong>3.20</strong></td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024096</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td><strong>3.00</strong></td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03104</td><td>Skr</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>2.80</strong></td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD024092</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>2.80</strong></td><td>3.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>2.80</strong></td><td>3.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD01AU15</td><td>Bet</td><td>AU</td><td><strong>2.70</strong></td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024095</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>2.60</strong></td><td>2.8</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024090</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>2.60</strong></td><td>2.8</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD024097</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>2.60</strong></td><td>2.8</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD024091</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td><strong>2.50</strong></td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD01CU29</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td><strong>2.40</strong></td><td>2.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>L1</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD10446</td><td>Ip</td><td>—</td><td><strong>2.20</strong></td><td>2.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>L1</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Ip</td><td>—</td><td><strong>2.20</strong></td><td>2.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>L1</td><td>A2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid — significance rank diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid — significance rank diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
   subgraph L3["L3 · Intelligence-grade (DIW ≥ 3.6)"]
     HD03253["HD03253 EU Banking · 3.80"]:::l3
@@ -1048,7 +1046,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid — significance rank dia
   classDef l2p fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#0a0e27
   classDef l2 fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#0a0e27
   classDef l1 fill:#6a4c93,stroke:#6a4c93,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1076,12 +1074,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Perturbation</th><th>Effect on ranking</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+1 salience on HD03253</td><td>HD03253 moves to sole #1 (4.05); still L3</td></tr><tr><td>−1 novelty on HD03252</td><td>HD03252 drops to 3.50 (L2+); HD10447 takes sole L3 lead</td></tr><tr><td>+1 uncertainty-reduction on HD01FiU23</td><td>FiU23 enters L2+ top-3 at 3.75</td></tr><tr><td>Treat SD silence as DIW-bearing signal (new entity)</td><td>Adds a "null-event" item at DIW 3.4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Robustness</strong>: The top-5 DIW ranking (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252, HD01CU25, HD024082) is stable under any ±0.3 perturbation — all lead items remain in the top-5 under sensible re-weighting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency">Rank-ordering logic (ICD 203 Standard 5 — tradecraft transparency)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency">Rank-ordering logic (ICD 203 Standard 5 — tradecraft transparency)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong> — how many stakeholders care today? HD03253 and HD03252 rank top because they generate cross-constituency attention (banks, civil-liberty NGOs, EU institutions, opposition parties).</p>
 <p><strong>Novelty</strong> — what does this add to prior knowledge? HD10447 ranks top because reopening the 2024 sick-pay reimbursement decision is a strategic signal, not a routine filing. HD03253 is partially telegraphed by EU timeline and thus scores lower on novelty than salience.</p>
 <p><strong>Dependency</strong> — how many downstream decisions hinge on this? HD03253 scores highest — committee bandwidth, summer-recess calendar, banking supervision all cascade off it.</p>
 <p><strong>Uncertainty reduction</strong> — does reading this reduce future ambiguity? HD10447 scores top because Minister Busch's response on 2026-05-07 will directly resolve PIR-3.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up">Cluster-level scoring (where individual items roll up)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up">Cluster-level scoring (where individual items roll up)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1118,48 +1116,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up">Cluster-level s
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Member dok_ids</th><th>Cluster DIW</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Drivmedel counter-motion cluster</td><td>HD024082 + HD024092 + HD024098</td><td>3.60</td><td>Three-party convergence raises political salience</td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning counter-motion cluster</td><td>HD024090 + HD024095 + HD024097</td><td>2.80</td><td>C/V/MP alignment without S — a narrower bloc</td></tr><tr><td>S interpellation cluster</td><td>HD10428–HD10446 (12 S-filed)</td><td>3.20</td><td>Strategic-pattern weight exceeds any single dok</td></tr><tr><td>Krigsmateriel cluster</td><td>HD024091 + HD024096</td><td>2.90</td><td>V+MP with S silence — structurally narrow</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day">Why today is a high-DIW day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day">Why today is a high-DIW day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day"></a></h3>
 <p>Three factors place today in the <strong>top-5% of reporting-day signal density</strong> for the 2026 mandate period to date:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Three L3-grade items land simultaneously (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252) — typical days have 0–1.</li>
 <li>Full legislative-arc visibility (prop → motion → bet → ip on the same cycle) is rare.</li>
 <li>SD's zero motions on 9 bills is itself a high-DIW "null-event" signal — the <strong>dog that did not bark</strong> is informative.</li>
 </ol>
-<p><em>Source: sibling folder significance-scoring.md files + cross-type DIW re-weighting per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §DIW Output Matrix</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Analyze how today's legislative batch is likely to be framed across major Swedish media categories and what this implies for narrative contestation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category">Expected framing by outlet category<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing">Public-service (SVT, SR, DN public-facing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category">Expected framing by outlet category<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing">Public-service (SVT, SR, DN public-facing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Likely frame</strong>: "Riksdagen behandlade fyra viktiga förslag" — procedurally balanced coverage</li>
 <li><strong>Emphasis</strong>: HD03252 and HD01CU25 will receive prominent coverage as most newsworthy</li>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: Proportionality framing on HD03252 — likely to be cautious/balanced</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet">Major morning papers (Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet">Major morning papers (Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DN likely frame</strong>: Rights-centric on HD03252; technocratic on HD03253; business-section on banking</li>
 <li><strong>SvD likely frame</strong>: Economic-competence framing on HD03253; fiscal-credibility framing on HD03104; business section for banking + SME sick-pay</li>
 <li><strong>Divergence</strong>: DN emphasizes rights/governance; SvD emphasizes fiscal/institutional</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen">Tabloids (Aftonbladet, Expressen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen">Tabloids (Aftonbladet, Expressen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Aftonbladet likely frame</strong>: "Regeringen försämrar levnadsvillkor för dömda" — rights framing; SME sick-pay as welfare story</li>
 <li><strong>Expressen likely frame</strong>: "Tidöavtalet levererar" — coalition-delivery framing; cost-of-living framed as opposition weakness</li>
 <li><strong>Divergence</strong>: Sharp — these outlets anchor opposition and coalition narratives respectively</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer">Business press (Affärsvärlden, Veckans Affärer)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer">Business press (Affärsvärlden, Veckans Affärer)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Frame</strong>: HD03253 + HD01FiU23 take center stage; political framing ignored</li>
 <li><strong>Emphasis</strong>: Bank RWA impact; Riksbank annual review; Swedish financial-supervisory stance</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-partisancampaign-media-various">Partisan/campaign media (various)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-partisancampaign-media-various"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-partisancampaign-media-various">Partisan/campaign media (various)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-partisancampaign-media-various"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S-aligned framing</strong>: Cost-of-living; SME workers; drivmedel as "regressive"</li>
 <li><strong>M/coalition-aligned framing</strong>: Discipline + delivery; EU compliance; capacity expansion</li>
 <li><strong>SD-aligned framing</strong>: Migration + rights-restriction victories; the interpellation storm as opposition weakness signals</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252">Framing contest on HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252">Framing contest on HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252"></a></h3>
 <p>Critical contested story. Expected framings:</p>
 
 
@@ -1196,7 +1193,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252">Framing contest on HD03252<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>Frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government PR</td><td>"Stramare regler mot dömda" — tightening rules against convicted</td></tr><tr><td>SVT</td><td>"Regeringen stramar åt för häktade" — tightening for detainees</td></tr><tr><td>DN leder</td><td>"Proportionalitetsfråga"</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet</td><td>"Människovärdets gränser"</td></tr><tr><td>Expressen</td><td>"Strikt men rättfärdigt"</td></tr><tr><td>V/MP aligned</td><td>"Människorättsattack"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Framing-battle prediction</strong>: 5–10 days of contested framing; dominant national frame will be somewhere between "stramare åtgärder" (neutral-government-leaning) and "proportionalitetsfråga" (neutral-rights-leaning). Aftonbladet and Expressen poles rarely capture majority framing in Swedish public discourse.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253">Framing contest on HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253">Framing contest on HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253"></a></h3>
 <p>Less contested. Technocratic dominance likely:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Business press: "CRR3/CRD6 transposition announced" — factual</li>
@@ -1204,7 +1201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253">Framing contest on HD03253<a class="" ari
 <li>Tabloids: Minimal coverage (low newsworthiness)</li>
 <li>Political framing risk: SD could frame as "EU overreach" — low probability given SD's pro-coalition position today</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447">Framing contest on HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447">Framing contest on HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447"></a></h3>
 <p>S's most successful lever. Expected framings:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Aftonbladet: "Företag tvingas betala för sjuka anställda" — sympathetic to SME narrative</li>
@@ -1213,7 +1210,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447">Framing contest on HD10447<a class="" ari
 <li>SVT Aktuellt: Likely features if Busch's response is defensive</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Framing-battle prediction</strong>: S will gain narrative ground if Busch's 2026-05-07 response is pure refusal. If Busch offers any compromise or review, framing neutralizes.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-dominance-matrix">Narrative dominance matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-dominance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-dominance-matrix">Narrative dominance matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-dominance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1256,9 +1253,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-dominance-matrix">Narrative dominance matrix<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Narrative</th><th>Coalition-favourable</th><th>Opposition-favourable</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Discipline + delivery" (HD03252/253/256/3104 + SD zero motions)</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>"Cost of living squeeze" (HD10447 + HD024082 cluster)</td><td>LOW</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>"Rights regime erosion" (HD03252 + HD01SfU23)</td><td>LOW</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>"Institutional competence" (HD03253 + HD01CU25)</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>"Coalition fragility" (L absence signal)</td><td>LOW</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td>"Riksbank under threat" (HD01FiU23 latent)</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW (dormant)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Net media-framing advantage over the next 14 days: <strong>narrowly opposition-favourable</strong> on volume (cost-of-living narrative has Segment F pull); <strong>narrowly coalition-favourable</strong> on institutional credibility.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-to-polling-conversion">Framing-to-polling conversion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-to-polling-conversion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-to-polling-conversion">Framing-to-polling conversion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-to-polling-conversion"></a></h3>
 <p>Historically, a 14-day dominant media frame shifts polling by approximately 0.5–1.5 pp in the favoured party. Today's contested framing batch could produce a <strong>0.5–1.0 pp net shift</strong> toward opposition on cost-of-living, partially offset by <strong>0.3–0.5 pp</strong> coalition shift on institutional credibility. <strong>Net expected shift: 0.0 to +0.5 pp toward opposition</strong> over 14 days.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation">Journalism quality and ICD 203 source-evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation">Journalism quality and ICD 203 source-evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis is framed-prediction, not primary-observation. Sources:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Content analysis from sibling folder media-framing-analysis files</li>
@@ -1266,12 +1263,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation">Journalism quality
 <li>Heuristic reasoning on rights/fiscal/institutional framing dynamics</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty code for framings above</strong>: B2 (reliable source category, but framed prediction, not observation).</p>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of sibling media-framing artifacts + journalism-coverage-pattern base rates.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder matrix per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 5</code>.
 Lenses: Government · Opposition · Civil society · Industry / market · Administrative / expert · International.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1327,28 +1323,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Key actors today</th><th>Reading of the day</th><th>Prevailing frame</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government / coalition</strong></td><td>PM Kristersson; Minister Wykman (FiU); Minister Strömmer (JuU); Minister Carlson (SfU); Minister Busch (NU)</td><td>"Tidöavtalet delivery sprint — four legacy bills signed off in a single reporting day; coalition discipline structurally intact with SD zero-motions."</td><td><em>Credibility through throughput</em></td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104 all Kristersson-signed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Parliamentary opposition (S-V-MP-C)</strong></td><td>S (lead on 12/16 ips + drivmedel); V (filed full-avslag on utvisning); MP (filed krigsmateriel ban); C (filed 3 utvisning counter-motions)</td><td>"Four separate counter-choreographies: S on economy, V on rights-maximalism, MP on ethics, C on flank-of-migration differentiation."</td><td><em>Choose your wedge early</em></td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024095 (V), HD024096 (MP), HD024090/97 (C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil society / NGOs</strong></td><td>Swedish section Amnesty; Civil Rights Defenders; Sveriges Advokatsamfund; Fackförbund TCO/LO</td><td>"HD03252 is the marquee rights concern; HD01SfU23 is the latent structural concern; SME sick-pay is the latent labour-market concern."</td><td><em>Structural rights erosion</em></td><td>ECHR literature; ongoing Advokatsamfundet proportionality campaign</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Industry / market</strong></td><td>Banking four (SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Nordea); SME employer orgs (Företagarna, Svenskt Näringsliv); transport industry (Transportföretagen); motor industry</td><td>"HD03253 is the tail-risk — Swedish banking RWA can change materially. HD10447 is a high-leverage symbolic bargaining chip. Transport industry sees HD03256 as routine."</td><td><em>Regulatory predictability is cheaper than surprise</em></td><td>Banking industry briefings on CRR3; Företagarna's standing sick-pay position</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Administrative / expert</strong></td><td>Kriminalvården (capacity); Migrationsverket (bifurcation); Riksbank (FiU23); Finansinspektionen (CRR3)</td><td>"Three of four top bills land directly on administrative agencies — capacity is the binding constraint, not politics."</td><td><em>Political ambition must match operational capacity</em></td><td>CU25 capacity concerns; SfU23 bifurcation operationalization</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International / EU</strong></td><td>EU Commission (banking + migration); Council of Europe / ECtHR (detainee conditions); Nordic peers (DK/NO/FI parallel tracks)</td><td>"EU prudential file is on the critical path; ECHR watchdogs are priming challenges; Nordic comparators observe Sweden's detainee-rights experiment."</td><td><em>Sweden sets, then sometimes corrects, Nordic norms</em></td><td>CRR3 EU calendar; ECtHR Article 3 case law</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-role-playing-exercises">Role-playing exercises<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-role-playing-exercises"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator">Red team perspective — opposition strategy operator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-role-playing-exercises">Role-playing exercises<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-role-playing-exercises"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator">Red team perspective — opposition strategy operator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"We've chosen our ground. Drivmedel is our pre-election anchor because it translates trivially to household budgets; HD10447 is our strategic reopening of the 2024 sick-pay fight; and we refuse to engage on krigsmateriel or utvisning because those are ideological traps. Let V/MP/C signal-differentiate on rights; we own the wallet."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading is consistent with S filing the sole drivmedel motion (HD024082) and leading 12/16 interpellations in one window — a <strong>strategic concentration</strong>, not a shotgun approach.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff">Red team perspective — PMO chief of staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff">Red team perspective — PMO chief of staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"Four bills, two weeks of session left before summer recess, all signed by the PM personally. Message: the government has delivered. SD filed nothing. L is quiet. The interpellation storm is routine opposition theatre — we respond within rules. The one landmine is HD03252: if L blinks in JuU on proportionality, we lose our coalition-discipline narrative. We watch L, not S."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading is consistent with the observed ministerial signing pattern and the lack of any L-lead ministry in today's batch.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel">Red team perspective — Civil Rights Defenders counsel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel">Red team perspective — Civil Rights Defenders counsel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"HD03252 is a ECHR Article 3 / Article 8 test case waiting to happen. We coordinate with Amnesty SE and Advokatsamfundet. We file an amicus brief before third reading. We prepare litigation readiness for Q4 2026. We do not over-mobilize now — we let V carry the parliamentary fight and we win the courtroom fight."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading predicts a 12–18-month latency between bill enactment (Aug 2026) and the first substantive ECtHR filing (est. 2027–2028).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro">Red team perspective — banking sector CRO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro">Red team perspective — banking sector CRO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"CRR3/CRD6 transposition could add 15–35 bps to our RWA. We cannot tolerate a late or overzealous Swedish transposition. We brief FiU, we brief Finansinspektionen, we publish our own QIS. We push for a minimal-transposition, straight-EU-compliance approach. We treat HD03253 as operationally urgent even if politically quiet."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading explains why HD03253 carries such high DIW despite low public controversy — the markets and regulators treat it as priority-1.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map">Cross-stakeholder tension map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map">Cross-stakeholder tension map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   Gov["Coalition\n(M-KD-L + SD)"] -->|Delivers| HD03252["HD03252"]
   Gov -->|Delivers| HD03253["HD03253"]
@@ -1371,7 +1367,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map">Cross-stakeholder tension map<a class=
   class OppS,OppV,OppMP,OppC opp
   class CivSoc,Industry civ
   class EU,ECHR intl</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary">Stakeholder pressure weight summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary">Stakeholder pressure weight summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>For each top-5 dok_id, weighted sum of aligned-vs-opposed stakeholders:</p>
 
 
@@ -1421,13 +1417,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary">Stakeholder pressure weight summ
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Aligned</th><th>Opposed</th><th>Net</th><th>Interpretation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>Gov + Industry + Admin (FI)</td><td>— (EU neutral)</td><td>+3</td><td>Likely smooth passage</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Gov + SD + Industry (neutral)</td><td>V + MP + CivSoc + C (partial)</td><td>0</td><td>Passage likely but contested</td></tr><tr><td>HD10447</td><td>Industry (SME) + S</td><td>Gov (Busch)</td><td>0</td><td>Symbolic bargaining</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Gov + CivSoc (on standards)</td><td>Admin (capacity concerns)</td><td>+1</td><td>Passage with amendments</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S + V + MP + consumers</td><td>Gov + M-KD-L</td><td>0</td><td>Defeated in plenum but wedge value retained</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<p><em>Source: sibling folder stakeholder-perspectives.md + synthesis of industry-briefing precedent.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Four-horizon dated-indicator system per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 10</code>.
 <strong>Horizons</strong>: T+7 days · T+30 days · T+90 days · T+12 months.
 <strong>Indicator types</strong>: Calendar-anchored · Event-triggered · Threshold-triggered.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01">T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01">T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1466,7 +1461,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01">T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidde
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation if YES</th><th>Interpretation if NO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td>FiU session calendar published</td><td>calendar release</td><td>HD03253 first hearing date</td><td>S1 scenario reinforced</td><td>S3 indicator</td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>DN/SvD editorial on HD03252</td><td>editorial publication</td><td>Proportionality framing</td><td>Framing contest live</td><td>Coalition framing dominant</td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>Aftonbladet front-page on SME sick-pay</td><td>front page</td><td>HD10447 narrative amplification</td><td>S wedge traction</td><td>Wedge contained</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24">T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24">T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1521,7 +1516,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24">T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation if YES</th><th>Interpretation if NO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F4</td><td>Minister Busch HD10447 response</td><td>2026-05-07 session</td><td>Refusal / compromise / review</td><td>Campaign inflection</td><td>Routine defense</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>JuU first hearing on HD03252</td><td>schedule</td><td>Proportionality motion discussed</td><td>PIR-4 activation</td><td>Routine passage path</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td>L public comment on HD03252</td><td>media appearance</td><td>L position clarity</td><td>Coalition reinforced</td><td>L flank signal</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>Kriminalvården monthly capacity update</td><td>end of May publication</td><td>Capacity trend</td><td>On-track</td><td>PIR-5 pre-flag</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td>FiU schedule HD03253 (PIR-1)</td><td>2026-05-15 deadline</td><td>Scheduling event</td><td>S1 reinforced</td><td>S3 activated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23">T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23">T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1584,7 +1579,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23">T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)<a class="" aria-hid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation if YES</th><th>Interpretation if NO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F9</td><td>HD03252 floor vote outcome</td><td>June 2026</td><td>Coalition discipline on amendments</td><td>Sprint narrative succeeds</td><td>Fracture emerges</td></tr><tr><td>F10</td><td>Q2 Kriminalvården capacity report</td><td>2026-06-23</td><td>Bed-count vs plan</td><td>On-plan = S1</td><td>Off-plan = S2</td></tr><tr><td>F11</td><td>Polling shift (YouGov/Novus)</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>+/- 3pp shift bloc-to-bloc</td><td>Scenario discrimination</td><td>Status quo</td></tr><tr><td>F12</td><td>HD03253 first-reading complete</td><td>June/July</td><td>Transposition timeline</td><td>S1 reinforced</td><td>S3 signals</td></tr><tr><td>F13</td><td>ECHR filing signal on HD03252</td><td>post-enactment</td><td>Filing preliminaries</td><td>R2 activated</td><td>Latent remains</td></tr><tr><td>F14</td><td>SD 30-day motion-filing rate</td><td>rolling</td><td>Coalition discipline index</td><td>&#x3C; 2 motions = S1</td><td>> 3 motions = signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24">T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24">T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1640,7 +1635,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24">T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F15</td><td>September 2026 election outcome</td><td>Sep 2026</td><td>Mandatsiffror</td><td>Scenario S1/S2/S3/S4 resolution</td></tr><tr><td>F16</td><td>EU Commission letter on CRR3 transposition</td><td>post-deadline</td><td>Regulatory letter</td><td>R1 confirmed or avoided</td></tr><tr><td>F17</td><td>First ECHR chamber-level filing on HD03252</td><td>Q2-Q3 2027</td><td>Case registration</td><td>R2 activated</td></tr><tr><td>F18</td><td>Kriminalvården annual capacity report</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>Capacity delivery</td><td>Operational promise-keeping</td></tr><tr><td>F19</td><td>SME sick-pay legislation under new government?</td><td>post-election</td><td>Legislative proposal</td><td>Post-S1 or post-S2 directly</td></tr><tr><td>F20</td><td>Riksbank-independence debate escalation</td><td>ongoing</td><td>Institutional debate</td><td>Black-swan latent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-priority-ranking">Indicator priority ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-priority-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-priority-ranking">Indicator priority ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-priority-ranking"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier-1 (decision-forcing, &#x3C; 30 days)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>F4 (Busch response 2026-05-07)</li>
@@ -1659,7 +1654,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-priority-ranking">Indicator priority ranking<a class="" ari
 <li>F15 (election outcome)</li>
 <li>F16-F20 (post-election)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-calendar-placement">Calendar placement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-placement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-calendar-placement">Calendar placement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-placement"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
   dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
   title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -1678,7 +1673,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-calendar-placement">Calendar placement<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
   section T+12 months
   Election                 :crit, f15, 2026-09-13, 1d
   ECHR preliminary filing  :f17, 2027-04-01, 90d</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping">Indicator-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping">Indicator-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1725,14 +1720,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping">Indicator-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Forward Indicator</th><th>Linked PIR</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F4</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>PIR-4</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td>PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>F7, F10, F18</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>F13, F17</td><td>PIR-2 (and emerging)</td></tr><tr><td>F15</td><td>All scenarios</td></tr><tr><td>F16</td><td>PIR-1 final resolution</td></tr><tr><td>F20</td><td>PIR-7</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-null-indicator-watch">Null-indicator watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-null-indicator-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-null-indicator-watch">Null-indicator watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-null-indicator-watch"></a></h3>
 <p>Three <strong>absence</strong> signals to monitor (dog-that-did-not-bark):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SD silence on HD03252</strong>: if SD remains silent through JuU, coalition discipline reinforced</li>
 <li><strong>L silence on HD03252</strong>: if L declines public comment for 30 days, coalition internal-management succeeded</li>
 <li><strong>MP silence on drivmedel</strong>: if MP joins drivmedel cluster (currently S-led), opposition consolidation sharpened</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-cadence">Monitoring cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-cadence">Monitoring cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-cadence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Daily</strong>: F1-F3 (T+7 watch)</li>
 <li><strong>Weekly</strong>: F4-F8 + null-indicators</li>
@@ -1740,14 +1735,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-cadence">Monitoring cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Monthly</strong>: F9-F14 comprehensive review</li>
 <li><strong>Quarterly</strong>: F15-F20 strategic review</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of sibling forward-indicators artifacts; calendar-anchoring per published Riksdag session plan.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Three-scenario baseline + branching (ICD 203 Standard 9 — alternative analysis)
 <strong>Horizon</strong>: T+30 days (pre-summer-recess) → T+4 months (early election campaign) → T+12 months (post-election)
 <strong>Baseline date</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 1.00)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050">Scenario S1 — "Sprint succeeds, coalition consolidates" (Prob: 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 1.00)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050">Scenario S1 — "Sprint succeeds, coalition consolidates" (Prob: 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: All 4 propositions pass committee by mid-June, floor by end-June. HD03253 transposition schedule holds. HD01CU25 Kriminalvården Q2 report shows on-plan capacity. SD maintains zero-motion discipline through summer. L publicly supports HD03252 after a cosmetic proportionality amendment. S's cost-of-living campaign gains traction in July but coalition responds with a pre-recess communication package. The Tidö coalition enters summer recess with a delivery-legacy narrative largely intact.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1757,7 +1751,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050">Scenari
 <li>YouGov/Novus show no ≥ 3pp shift toward S before 2026-08-31</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: Any of the four signposts fails → downgrade to S2.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035">Scenario S2 — "Wedge works, opposition gains ground" (Prob: 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035">Scenario S2 — "Wedge works, opposition gains ground" (Prob: 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: S's HD10447 + drivmedel combination gains media traction during May. Minister Busch gives a flat-footed response. Q2 Kriminalvården capacity data disappoints. Polling shifts 3–5pp toward S–V–MP bloc by August. Coalition still holds formally but loses pre-election momentum. HD03252 passes with minor amendment but faces first ECHR filing signal in Q4. HD03253 transposition slips to autumn session.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1767,7 +1761,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035">Scenario S
 <li>First ECHR preliminary filing signal on HD03252 before 2026-12-31</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: Coalition response to the above blunts wedge → upgrade back to S1 (conditional).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012">Scenario S3 — "Institutional stress — EU deadline slips + L fracture" (Prob: 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012">Scenario S3 — "Institutional stress — EU deadline slips + L fracture" (Prob: 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: HD03253 FiU schedule slips past 2026-05-15. Summer recess consumed. Autumn session rushed. L publicly dissents on HD03252 proportionality, forcing a coalition crisis-management episode in JuU. SD silence broken by an unexpected counter-signal on detainee benefits. Opposition unity strengthens. Coalition enters election campaign with fractured L flank, late EU-banking transposition, and one ECHR filing.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1777,7 +1771,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob
 <li>EU Commission sends letter of formal notice on CRR3 transposition</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: L internal resolution on HD03252 → conditional downgrade.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003">Scenario S4 — "Black swan — Riksbank independence flashpoint" (Prob: 0.03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003">Scenario S4 — "Black swan — Riksbank independence flashpoint" (Prob: 0.03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: HD01FiU23 debate takes an unexpected turn with SD or KD raising a political-oversight proposal. Media frames as "government challenges Riksbank". Markets respond with currency volatility. Opposition pivots to constitutional-defender narrative. Coalition dominates the news cycle for the wrong reason. All other bills become secondary.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1786,7 +1780,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003">S
 <li>KU initiates review of Riksbank law</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: HD01FiU23 passes as routine annual review.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-tree-diagram">Scenario tree diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-tree-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-tree-diagram">Scenario tree diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-tree-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   Start["2026-04-24\nBaseline"] --> Dec1{"FiU schedules\nHD03253 by\n2026-05-15?"}
   Dec1 -- Yes --> Dec2{"L supports\nHD03252 amendment?"}
@@ -1806,7 +1800,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-tree-diagram">Scenario tree diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="
   class S2 s2
   class S3 s3
   class S4 s4</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-probability-rationale">Probability rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-rationale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-probability-rationale">Probability rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-rationale"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1849,7 +1843,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-probability-rationale">Probability rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Prior</th><th>Evidence pull</th><th>Posterior</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>0.40</td><td>+SD discipline intact, +PM-signed bills, −L quiet (neutral-to-positive)</td><td>0.50</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>0.35</td><td>+S concentrated strategy, +drivmedel 3-party convergence</td><td>0.35</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>0.20</td><td>−only L quiet, no public dissent, +EU deadline tight</td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>0.05</td><td>−no current catalyst visible</td><td>0.03</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sum</strong></td><td><strong>1.00</strong></td><td></td><td><strong>1.00</strong> ✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-by-scenario">Implications by scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-by-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-by-scenario">Implications by scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-by-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1891,17 +1885,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-by-scenario">Implications by scenario<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Implication for coalition</th><th>Implication for opposition</th><th>Implication for markets</th><th>Implication for civil society</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Delivery-legacy</td><td>Regroup for Q4</td><td>Low volatility</td><td>Prep for post-enactment litigation</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Campaign on defense</td><td>Momentum, maintain discipline</td><td>Moderate SEK, equity volatility</td><td>Active press/campaign coordination</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Crisis management</td><td>Windfall</td><td>High volatility; bank equities weak</td><td>Accelerated ECHR prep</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Worst case; crisis</td><td>Windfall; constitutional frame</td><td>High SEK/bond volatility</td><td>Neutral (institutional, not rights)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan">Cross-scenario monitoring plan<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan">Cross-scenario monitoring plan<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Week of 2026-04-28</strong>: FiU agenda publication (HD03253 scheduling) — binary signal for S1 vs S3.
 <strong>Week of 2026-05-05</strong>: Minister Busch response on HD10447 — signal for S1 vs S2.
 <strong>Week of 2026-05-15</strong>: PIR-1 deadline — binary signal.
 <strong>Week of 2026-06-09</strong>: JuU passage of HD03252 — signal on L flank.
 <strong>Week of 2026-06-23</strong>: Kriminalvården Q2 capacity report — S1 stability signal.</p>
-<p><em>Source: cross-scenario synthesis of sibling scenario analyses; Bayesian re-weighting of priors based on today's signals.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 5-dimension risk register (Political × Legal × Operational × Financial × Reputational) with L×I (Likelihood × Impact) scoring on a 1–5 scale.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li">Risk register (ranked by L×I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li">Risk register (ranked by L×I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2068,7 +2061,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li">Risk register (ranked by L×I)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Dimensions</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation / monitor</th><th>Linked dok_ids</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>HD03253 missed EU transposition deadline → EU infraction procedure</td><td>Legal × Reputational</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>PIR-1: monitor FiU calendar</td><td>HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>HD03252 ECHR Article 3/8 challenge → constitutional-level loss</td><td>Legal × Reputational</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>Proportionality amendment before 3rd reading</td><td>HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss ≥ 10%</td><td>Operational × Political</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>PIR-5: Kriminalvården Q2 report</td><td>HD01CU25, HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>L-coalition fracture on HD03252</td><td>Political × Reputational</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>PIR-2: L press monitoring</td><td>HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>Banking sector disorderly CRR3 implementation → market stress</td><td>Financial × Operational</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>FI QIS publication; clear transposition calendar</td><td>HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>S cost-of-living campaign achieves traction → Tidö ballot-box damage</td><td>Political × Reputational</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td><td>Counter-narrative on HD03104 debt skr</td><td>HD10447, HD024082</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Migration bifurcation (HD01SfU23) operational breakdown at Migrationsverket</td><td>Operational × Legal</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Post-Q2 audit</td><td>HD01SfU23</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Riksbank independence debate re-opens</td><td>Political × Financial</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>PIR-7: UU/KU calendar</td><td>HD01FiU23</td></tr><tr><td>R9</td><td>Utvisning counter-motions mobilize cross-party C+V+MP bloc</td><td>Political × Reputational</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>SfU committee management</td><td>HD024090/95/97</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Krigsmateriel ethical wedge pulls S supporters away</td><td>Political</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>Monitor S communications</td><td>HD024096</td></tr><tr><td>R11</td><td>MP ethical gambit dilutes S dominance of opposition frame</td><td>Political (inter-opposition)</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>N/A</td><td>HD024096</td></tr><tr><td>R12</td><td>Tachograph (HD03256) delays affect transport industry</td><td>Operational</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>Committee passage</td><td>HD03256</td></tr><tr><td>R13</td><td>Debt-mgmt skr reframed as fiscal vulnerability</td><td>Financial × Political</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>Technical communication</td><td>HD03104</td></tr><tr><td>R14</td><td>Summer-recess schedule compression — bills rushed</td><td>Operational × Legal</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Earlier committee scheduling</td><td>HD03253, HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R15</td><td>Interpellation backlog → administrative fatigue</td><td>Operational</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>Minister response triage</td><td>HD10428–47</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>        I=1   I=2   I=3   I=4   I=5
 L=5      ·     ·     ·     ·     ·
 L=4      ·     ·    R6     ·     ·
@@ -2082,37 +2075,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <li><strong>Sleeper cell (L=2, I=4–5)</strong>: R1, R5, R8 — low-likelihood but catastrophic-if-triggered institutional risks.</li>
 <li><strong>Chronic cell (L≥3, I=3)</strong>: R6, R7, R14 — ongoing political/operational threats requiring sustained monitoring.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives">Top-5 risk deep dives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12">R2 — HD03252 ECHR challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives">Top-5 risk deep dives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12">R2 — HD03252 ECHR challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: Bill passes → enters force 2026-08-01 → first operational incident Q4 2026 → domestic court appeals → ECtHR filing Q2–Q4 2027 → judgment 2028–2029.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: NGO statements within 30 days of promulgation; academic-commentary pattern.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: A formal proportionality clause added before third reading.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12">R3 — Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12">R3 — Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: HD01CU25 sets capacity baseline → Q2 actual falls short → HD03252 operational impacts amplify → legal exposure under R2 compounds.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: PIR-5 Q2 report.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Pre-emptive Kriminalvården communication on capacity realism.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12">R6 — S cost-of-living campaign traction (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12">R6 — S cost-of-living campaign traction (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: S HD10447 traction during May → drivmedel cluster gains summer salience → pre-election polling shift by August.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: DN/SvD editorial alignment by 2026-05-15; YouGov/Novus polling shift.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Coalition positive-agenda launch.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10">R1 — CRR3/CRD6 transposition miss (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10">R1 — CRR3/CRD6 transposition miss (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: FiU fails to schedule by 2026-05-15 → summer recess consumed → autumn rush → incomplete transposition by 2027 deadline → EU infraction.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: PIR-1 FiU calendar.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9">R14 — Summer-recess compression (L×I = 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9">R14 — Summer-recess compression (L×I = 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: 4 bills + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations = high schedule compression → substantive debate quality degrades.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: Any bill withdrawn or postponed from committee in May 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-aggregate-risk-posture">Aggregate risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-posture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregate-risk-posture">Aggregate risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-posture"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Net risk score</strong>: 15 risks × average L×I of 8.3 = <strong>baseline political risk environment: ELEVATED</strong></li>
 <li><strong>Direction of change vs prior 7 days</strong> (from sibling risk-assessments): ↑ +1 quintile — driven by simultaneous legal+operational+financial triple.</li>
 <li><strong>Heat cell concentration</strong>: 2 risks in the (3,4)-(4,4) quadrant — both on HD03252.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling risk-assessment.md files.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Kent-SWOT with TOWS matrix per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 6</code>.
 Actor of analysis: <strong>The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)</strong> as it approaches September 2026 election.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2149,7 +2141,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Legislative throughput — 4 propositions on a single day, 9 active bills</td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>SD coalition discipline intact — zero counter-motions on 9 bills</td><td>Motion registry (72h window)</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>EU-alignment track record (CRR3/CRD6, tachograph)</td><td>HD03253, HD03256</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Personal PM signature on all four props — concentrates credibility</td><td>Signing block on HD03252/253/256/3104</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Administrative capacity backbone — Kriminalvården Q2 reporting</td><td>HD01CU25</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2186,7 +2178,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>L (Liberals) out of lead-minister rotation — signals internal weight loss</td><td>Today's 4-bill batch (zero L leads)</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>HD03252 proportionality design legally thin — ECHR litigation risk</td><td>KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>HD03253 transposition timeline tight — missed EU deadline possible</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Kriminalvården capacity plan unproven against demand curve</td><td>CU25 subtext</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>No positive agenda on cost-of-living — exposed to S wedge</td><td>HD024082 + HD10447</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2223,7 +2215,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence / path</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Pre-recess "legacy-set" framing if all 4 bills pass by June</td><td>Committee calendar</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Banking-sector credit with orderly CRR3 transposition</td><td>HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 "delivery moment" — visible capacity expansion</td><td>HD01CU25</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Quiet co-option of MP's krigsmateriel bill (peel ethical voters)</td><td>HD024096 (low-cost signal)</td></tr><tr><td>O5</td><td>Economic-credibility narrative via skr debt management</td><td>HD03104</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2270,7 +2262,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence / trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>ECHR challenge to HD03252 within 18 months</td><td>KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>Missed EU banking transposition deadline</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>S successful cost-of-living campaign (drivmedel + SME sick-pay)</td><td>HD024082, HD10447</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>L-coalition fracture on HD03252 proportionality</td><td>PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td>Riksbank-independence debate re-opening (sleeper)</td><td>HD01FiU23</td></tr><tr><td>T6</td><td>Opposition coordination on utvisning/bifurcation</td><td>HD024090/95/97, HD01SfU23</td></tr><tr><td>T7</td><td>Late-cycle capacity slippage in Kriminalvården</td><td>CU25 operational risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2292,7 +2284,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td><strong>SO — Delivery-credibility sprint</strong>: S1/S4 × O1/O3. Finish 4 bills + CU25 Q2 delivery milestone on the same pre-recess timeline. Yields "We deliver" narrative.</td><td><strong>ST — Proportionality defence</strong>: S1 × T1/T4. Leverage parliamentary majority to add a formal proportionality safeguard to HD03252, pre-empting ECHR challenge and L fracture.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td><strong>WO — Positive-agenda gap close</strong>: W5 × O5. Use HD03104 debt-management skr as platform for a pre-recess cost-of-living communication push. Partial, but better than silence.</td><td><strong>WT — Defensive containment</strong>: W1/W3 × T2/T3. Accept that HD03253 may slip to autumn; pre-announce a transposition roadmap. On L, pre-emptively float a minor HD03252 amendment to prevent open fracture.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition">TOWS strategic recommendations (for intelligence consumers, not the coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition">TOWS strategic recommendations (for intelligence consumers, not the coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>For parliamentary watchers</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Monitor L's JuU statements on HD03252 for the first-week-of-May proportionality amendment. If L supports amendment, coalition is reinforced; if L opposes, first real fracture of mandate.</li>
@@ -2311,18 +2303,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coa
 <ul>
 <li>S has chosen its campaign terrain (economy). V has chosen rights. MP has chosen ethics. C has chosen migration-flank differentiation. <strong>Four separate campaign arcs in one reporting day</strong> — a first in this mandate.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-net-swot-balance">Net SWOT balance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-swot-balance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-net-swot-balance">Net SWOT balance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-swot-balance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Strengths (5) > Weaknesses (5)</strong> but substantively equal — Tidöavtalet delivery is real but fragile.</li>
 <li><strong>Opportunities (5) ≈ Threats (7)</strong> — threats narrowly outnumber opportunities.</li>
 <li><strong>Net strategic position</strong>: <em>coalition is delivering on its legacy agenda but accumulating latent risks</em> — precisely the position a pre-election incumbent adopts when converting political capital to policy durability.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: Kent-SWOT synthesis of all sibling SWOT analyses + cross-type strategic framing.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Political-threat taxonomy + attack-tree per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 8</code>.
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Threats to democratic accountability, institutional integrity, and rule-of-law durability exposed by today's legislative batch — not security threats to individuals or infrastructure.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2392,7 +2383,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat class</th><th>Manifestation today</th><th>Severity</th><th>Direction (↑/↓/→)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Rights erosion via coercive-authority expansion</td><td>HD03252 benefit restrictions</td><td>HIGH</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>Rule-of-law bifurcation</td><td>HD01SfU23 two-track migration</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Institutional capture (central bank)</td><td>HD01FiU23 recurring Riksbank critique</td><td>MEDIUM (latent)</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>Legislative throughput at expense of deliberation</td><td>4 props + 5 bet in one day</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td>EU-compliance late-failure</td><td>HD03253 tight timeline</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>T6</td><td>Opposition atomization</td><td>S/V/MP/C four separate arcs</td><td>LOW (for gov) / HIGH (for opposition cohesion)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T7</td><td>Coalition discipline hardening (SD zero motions)</td><td>9-bill silence</td><td>LOW (not a threat today)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T8</td><td>Populist media framing of coalition-discipline</td><td>"SD vetoes everything" narrative risk</td><td>LOW</td><td>→</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case">Attack tree — "HD03252 becomes a legitimacy-damaging rights case"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case">Attack tree — "HD03252 becomes a legitimacy-damaging rights case"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>ROOT: HD03252 enters force 2026-08-01 and triggers domestic/ECHR challenge
 ├── Branch A: Bill passes without proportionality safeguard
 │   ├── A1: Government holds firm on Tidö framework
@@ -2410,7 +2401,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case">Attac
     └── D1: 2028–2029 ECtHR judgment (L=0.3 conditional on C reach)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Compound probability of adverse ECHR judgment within 30 months</strong>: ≈ 5–9% (0.7 × 0.5 × 0.3). <strong>Low absolute but high-impact.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping">Threat × stakeholder mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping">Threat × stakeholder mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2489,10 +2480,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping">Threat × stakeholder mapping<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Coalition</th><th>Opposition</th><th>Civil society</th><th>EU</th><th>Markets</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td><strong>Benefits</strong> (campaign)</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Watches</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td><strong>Benefits</strong> (campaign)</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Watches</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Mixed</td><td>Watches</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Watches</td><td><strong>Opposes</strong></td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>Benefits</td><td>Watches</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td><strong>Loses</strong> (if realized)</td><td>Benefits</td><td>Neutral</td><td><strong>Opposes</strong></td><td>Opposes</td></tr><tr><td>T6</td><td>Benefits</td><td><strong>Loses</strong></td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T7</td><td>Benefits</td><td><strong>Loses</strong></td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T8</td><td>Loses slightly</td><td>Benefits</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment">Asymmetric-threat assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment">Asymmetric-threat assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Most of today's threats are <strong>structural-institutional</strong> rather than acute. The one acute threat surface is HD03252's rights-regime footprint: a single operational incident in Q3 2026 could catalyze an outsized rights-NGO and international response.</p>
 <p>The sleeper asymmetric threat is <strong>T3 (Riksbank independence)</strong>: very low probability in the next quarter, but if activated, would have an outsized effect on Swedish financial-market reputation — a classic black-swan-shaped risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-to-pir-mapping">Threat-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-to-pir-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-to-pir-mapping">Threat-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-to-pir-mapping"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>T1 → PIR-2 (L fracture) + PIR-4 (SD discipline on HD03252)</li>
 <li>T2 → Watchlist (HD01SfU23 Q2 audit)</li>
@@ -2503,17 +2494,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-to-pir-mapping">Threat-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>T7 → Standing PIR-A (SD motion filings)</li>
 <li>T8 → N/A (media-framing watchlist only)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers">Counter-threat recommendations (for intelligence consumers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers">Counter-threat recommendations (for intelligence consumers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Parliamentary observers</strong>: Prioritize attention to L in May on HD03252 proportionality; attention to FiU calendar on HD03253.</li>
 <li><strong>Market analysts</strong>: Monitor HD03253 transposition timeline + HD01FiU23 speaker list.</li>
 <li><strong>Civil-liberty NGOs</strong>: Pre-position legal-readiness for HD03252 ECHR challenge starting 2026-Q4.</li>
 <li><strong>EU desk officers</strong>: Track Swedish CRR3 transposition status weekly.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-type synthesis of threat profiles from sibling threat-analysis artifacts.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25">HD01CU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2524,7 +2514,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25">HD01CU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2535,7 +2525,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2546,7 +2536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2557,7 +2547,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10447">HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2568,11 +2558,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10447">HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: September 2026 (statutory cycle)
 <strong>T-minus</strong>: ~5 months
 <strong>Baseline question</strong>: How does today's legislative batch reshape the 2026 campaign arc?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-election-relevant-signals">Today's election-relevant signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-election-relevant-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-election-relevant-signals">Today's election-relevant signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-election-relevant-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2611,38 +2601,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-todays-election-relevant-signals">Today's election-relevant signals<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Campaign implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PM personally signs 4 propositions</td><td>Coalition concentrates credibility in PM office — presidentialization of the M-KD-L-SD arrangement</td></tr><tr><td>SD zero counter-motions</td><td>Coalition-discipline narrative available to government ("partner of confidence delivers")</td></tr><tr><td>S leads 12/16 interpellations + drivmedel motion</td><td>S chooses cost-of-living as primary campaign terrain</td></tr><tr><td>V leads rights-maximalism (HD024095)</td><td>V targets left-libertarian voters; differentiates from S</td></tr><tr><td>MP krigsmateriel motion</td><td>MP targets ethical-progressive voters; classic MP move</td></tr><tr><td>C three utvisning counter-motions</td><td>C targets migration-policy flank; differentiates from S</td></tr><tr><td>L absent from lead ministries</td><td>L's campaign faces "what did we actually deliver?" question</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-campaign-arc-reading">Campaign-arc reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-arc-reading"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd">Coalition (M-KD-L + SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-campaign-arc-reading">Campaign-arc reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-arc-reading"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd">Coalition (M-KD-L + SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: "We delivered" — 4-bill legacy + SD discipline + Kriminalvården capacity + banking transposition</li>
 <li><strong>Vulnerability</strong>: Cost-of-living exposure; no positive fiscal story; L internal tension</li>
 <li><strong>Key pre-election event</strong>: Summer-recess communication sprint on all 4 bills passed</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-s-social-democrats">S (Social Democrats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-social-democrats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-social-democrats">S (Social Democrats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-social-democrats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: "Cost of living; government serves large capital, not families" — drivmedel + SME sick-pay + fiscal critique</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Concentrate fire on economic axis; cede rights/ethics to V/MP/C</li>
 <li><strong>Key test</strong>: Does Busch's HD10447 response on 2026-05-07 open a pathway for S to pivot to "failed response" narrative?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-v-left">V (Left)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-left"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v-left">V (Left)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-left"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: Rights-maximalism; defense of migrants and detainees</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Differentiate left flank from S on identity issues</li>
 <li><strong>Key test</strong>: Will HD024095 vote pattern reveal V-MP-C coordination or fragmentation?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-mp-green">MP (Green)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-green"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp-green">MP (Green)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-green"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: Ethical/climate-adjacent wedges (krigsmateriel)</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Revival of traditional MP identity via ethical-policy motions</li>
 <li><strong>Key test</strong>: Do MP polling numbers move on the krigsmateriel angle?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-c-centre">C (Centre)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-centre"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c-centre">C (Centre)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-centre"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: Migration-flank differentiation</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Maintain urban-rural-centre voter base</li>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: Visibility remains low</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking">Coalition scenario probabilities (T+5 months, forward-looking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking">Coalition scenario probabilities (T+5 months, forward-looking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2675,7 +2665,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking">Coalition
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Coalition outcome 2026</th><th>Probability</th><th>Driver</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M-KD-L + SD re-elected (majority/supported)</td><td>0.38</td><td>S1 scenario plays out</td></tr><tr><td>S + V + MP (+ C?) forms government</td><td>0.30</td><td>S2 scenario + polling shift</td></tr><tr><td>Fragmented result; protracted formation</td><td>0.25</td><td>S3 scenario + volatility</td></tr><tr><td>Minority caretaker</td><td>0.07</td><td>S4 or combination</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Probabilities sum</strong>: 1.00 ✅</p>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0">Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0">Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2737,7 +2727,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0">Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>2022 result (seats)</th><th>Current polling est.</th><th>Pre-election trajectory (est)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>~33% → ~115 seats</td><td>Trending +</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>~18% → ~62 seats</td><td>Flat → -</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>~19% → ~67 seats</td><td>Flat</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>~8% → ~28 seats</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>~6% → ~21 seats</td><td>Flat</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>~4% → ~14 seats</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>~4% → ~14 seats</td><td>Flat</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>~3% → ~11 seats</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: Placeholder estimates; primary polling data ingest pending; this artifact's purpose is campaign-narrative inference, not precision seat forecast.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-election-strategic-map">Pre-election strategic map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-strategic-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-election-strategic-map">Pre-election strategic map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-strategic-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   Today["2026-04-24\nLegislative sprint"] --> Busch["2026-05-07\nBusch SME response\n(PIR-3)"]
   Today --> FiU["2026-05-15\nHD03253 FiU sched.\n(PIR-1)"]
@@ -2753,14 +2743,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-pre-election-strategic-map">Pre-election strategic map<a class="" ari
   class Today today
   class Busch,FiU,L pir
   class Summer,Campaign,Election stage</pre>
-<p><em>Source: cross-type inference from sibling folder materials; placeholder quantitative estimates for next-cycle refinement.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Current Riksdag composition</strong> (2022–2026 mandate):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Total: 349 seats · Majority threshold: 175 seats</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-distribution">Seat distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-distribution">Seat distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2822,8 +2811,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-distribution">Seat distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>Main opposition</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>Government (PM)</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>Support party (Tidöavtalet)</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government coalition + SD</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>Majority</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition (S+V+C+MP)</strong></td><td><strong>173</strong></td><td><strong>Minority</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids">Projected vote breakdown on today's top-5 dok_ids<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03253 (EU banking) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids">Projected vote breakdown on today's top-5 dok_ids<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03253 (EU banking) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2901,7 +2890,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03253 (EU banking) —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>200</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td><td><strong>125</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Bifall med stor majoritet. EU-compliance bills typically pass with broad assent. S abstains (standard on EU-mandated packages); C supports as EU-pragmatist; V likely opposes on ideological grounds; MP abstains.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03252 (detainee benefit restrictions) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03252 (detainee benefit restrictions) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2979,7 +2968,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown">HD032
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td><strong>16</strong></td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>170</strong></td><td><strong>48</strong></td><td><strong>131</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Bifall (170 Ja vs 48 Nej). <strong>However L split (10/6) is a PIR-2 critical signal</strong> — if L unity holds on Ja (16/0), coalition discipline is reinforced. If L dissent is larger (e.g., 6/10 split against), the bill passes with an unusual government-whip failure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (interpellation, SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (interpellation, SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay"></a></h4>
 <p>Not a vote — Minister Busch responds orally. Formal vote risk: if the interpellation is later converted to a motion or budget amendment, vote arithmetic becomes:</p>
 
 
@@ -3030,7 +3019,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (interpellation, SME sic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja (for SME reimbursement)</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>M + KD + L + SD</td><td>0</td><td>176</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Bloc total</strong></td><td><strong>149</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Motion outcome</strong>: Avslag (rejected). But the <strong>campaign value</strong> of 149 Ja seats is high — it sets up a 2026 election narrative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report">HD01CU25 (prison capacity committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report">HD01CU25 (prison capacity committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3087,7 +3076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report">HD01CU25 (prison capacity
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M-KD-L-SD</td><td>176</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>307</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td><td><strong>18</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Bifall with broad majority. Coalition + S + C all align on prison capacity; V alone on principled opposition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion">HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion">HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3144,7 +3133,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion">HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja (for motion)</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>M-KD-L-SD</td><td>0</td><td>176</td><td>0</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>149</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Avslag. Classic S-V-MP bloc vs. M-KD-L-SD bloc with C abstaining.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic">Coalition-discipline diagnostic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic">Coalition-discipline diagnostic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3196,7 +3185,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic">Coalition-discipline diagnostic<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Disciplined vote today?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Yes</td><td>Full Ja on all coalition bills</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>Yes</td><td>Full Ja</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td><strong>Conditional</strong></td><td>HD03252 proportionality flank — PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Yes (disciplined + no motions)</td><td>Zero-motion signal</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Yes (strategic concentration)</td><td>12/16 ip + drivmedel</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Yes (principled maximalism)</td><td>Full avslag on HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Yes (ethical signalling)</td><td>Krigsmateriel motion</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Yes (flank differentiation)</td><td>Utvisning motions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check">Mandatsiffror scenario check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check">Mandatsiffror scenario check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If election were held today</strong> (per most recent polling, rounded):</p>
 
 
@@ -3253,18 +3242,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check">Mandatsiffror scenario check<a class=""
 Opposition (S+V+MP): 115+28+14 = <strong>157</strong> (below threshold, needs C)
 <strong>With C's 21: 178</strong> (majority)</p>
 <p><strong>Under current polling, S + V + MP + C has a narrow majority. But C's willingness to join is an open question — and L's 4%-threshold risk adds volatility.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math">Implication of today's bills on coalition math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math">Implication of today's bills on coalition math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03253 passage</strong>: neutral coalition math (no swing votes at risk).</li>
 <li><strong>HD03252 passage</strong>: depends on L's internal cohesion — if L fractures publicly, coalition narrative weakens in Segment E.</li>
 <li><strong>HD10447 response by Busch</strong>: shapes S's ability to consolidate B + F segments.</li>
 <li><strong>HD024082 + cluster</strong>: baseline campaign fight; vote outcome immaterial, narrative value significant.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: Current Riksdag composition per data.riksdagen.se; projected vote distributions modeled on prior 2022–2026 mandate votes for analogous bills; L split scenarios per PIR-2.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 7-segment post-2022-election taxonomy (refined by 2024 Eurobarometer + SCB socio-economic data).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues">Segment matrix × today's issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues">Segment matrix × today's issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3319,39 +3307,39 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues">Segment matrix × today's issues<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size (est)</th><th>Core concerns</th><th>Today's issue relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>A. Coalition loyalists</strong> (M + KD + SD tail)</td><td>18%</td><td>Law &#x26; order; fiscal conservatism</td><td>Strongly aligned with HD03252, HD01CU25; skeptical of HD03253 costs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>B. S labour loyalists</strong></td><td>22%</td><td>Wage preservation; public services</td><td>Strongly aligned with HD10447, HD024082</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C. Urban progressives</strong> (V + MP + S left)</td><td>14%</td><td>Rights, climate, gender equality</td><td>Aligned with opposition to HD03252; supportive of HD024096</td></tr><tr><td><strong>D. Rural / peripheral SD-leaning</strong></td><td>11%</td><td>Migration, fuel costs, sovereignty</td><td>Ambivalent on HD03253; supportive of HD03252; ambivalent on HD024082</td></tr><tr><td><strong>E. Centrist independents</strong> (C + soft L)</td><td>10%</td><td>Economic pragmatism, stability</td><td>Pragmatic on HD03253; uncertain on HD03252; neutral on HD024082</td></tr><tr><td><strong>F. Low-information / occasional voters</strong></td><td>18%</td><td>Headline issues; cost of living</td><td>Responsive to HD024082; low engagement on prudential HD03253</td></tr><tr><td><strong>G. Disengaged / protest</strong></td><td>7%</td><td>None salient</td><td>Inert today</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-issue-to-segment-mapping">Issue-to-segment mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-to-segment-mapping"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits">HD03252 (detainee benefits)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-issue-to-segment-mapping">Issue-to-segment mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-to-segment-mapping"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits">HD03252 (detainee benefits)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Gains: Segments A (+), D (+)</li>
 <li>Neutral/ambivalent: F, G</li>
 <li>Loses: C (--), E (-)</li>
 <li><strong>Net coalition gain</strong>: +3pp nominal; erodes with each rights-litigation event</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking">HD03253 (EU banking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking">HD03253 (EU banking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Gains: None directly; perceived as "technocratic EU compliance"</li>
 <li>Risk: B (-), F (-) if framed as bank-friendly</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: 0 ± 0.5pp; a technocratic file</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S campaign asset: B (+), E (+), F (+)</li>
 <li>Coalition defensive: A (neutral), D (slight +)</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: S net +1.5pp if Busch response is flat-footed</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024082-drivmedel">HD024082 (drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-drivmedel"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024082-drivmedel">HD024082 (drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-drivmedel"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S campaign asset: B (+), D (+), F (+)</li>
 <li>Coalition risk: A (neutral), E (-)</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: S net +1pp; classic fuel-politics dynamic</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp">HD024096 (krigsmateriel MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp">HD024096 (krigsmateriel MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>MP base signal: C (++) (high-engagement segment)</li>
 <li>No cross-segment reach</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: MP +0.3pp; defensive of left flank</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics">Segment-level coalition mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics">Segment-level coalition mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics"></a></h3>
 <p>If by September 2026:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Segments A + D solidly hold for coalition → 29% floor</li>
@@ -3360,7 +3348,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics">Segment-level coalition mathemat
 <li>Segments B + C solidly hold for S + V + MP → 36% floor</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Pre-election working model</strong>: S-V-MP bloc has a narrow polling advantage (46% vs 43%) with 11% undecided pending cost-of-living debate resolution.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-turnout-sensitivity">Turnout sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-turnout-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-turnout-sensitivity">Turnout sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-turnout-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3387,21 +3375,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-turnout-sensitivity">Turnout sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Turnout</th><th>Coalition advantage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>High turnout (85%+)</td><td>Segment F activated on cost-of-living</td><td>S + V + MP benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Medium turnout (80–85%)</td><td>Standard 2022 dynamics</td><td>Coalition holds</td></tr><tr><td>Low turnout (&#x3C; 80%)</td><td>Segment G dropout benefits concentrated SD/coalition bloc</td><td>Coalition benefits</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings">Messaging alignment (observed from today's filings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings">Messaging alignment (observed from today's filings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition observed messaging</strong>: Delivery + discipline. Aligned with Segments A, D.
 <strong>S observed messaging</strong>: Cost-of-living + SME resilience. Aligned with Segments B, D, F.
 <strong>V observed messaging</strong>: Rights. Aligned with Segment C.
 <strong>MP observed messaging</strong>: Ethics + peace. Aligned with Segment C narrow.
 <strong>C observed messaging</strong>: Migration flank. Aligned with Segment E narrow.
 <strong>L observed messaging</strong>: Silent today. <strong>Risk of Segment E attrition.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway">Key voter-segmentation takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway">Key voter-segmentation takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's battle lines favor S structurally (B + D + F are economy-responsive). Coalition holds A + D partial; vulnerable on L's representation of E. <strong>MP and V compete for C — to the mutual detriment of S narrative consolidation.</strong></p>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of 2022 election data + 2024–25 Eurobarometer segmentation + sibling-folder inference; primary SCB polling not queried this cycle (use sparingly until monthly refresh).</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Nordic + EU minimum (Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, Netherlands)
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Cross-country parallel-case analysis with normalization for political-system differences, per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 9</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch">Comparator table — policy analogs to today's Swedish batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch">Comparator table — policy analogs to today's Swedish batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3485,8 +3472,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch">Comparator
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SE policy</th><th>Closest comparator(s)</th><th>Parallel analogue</th><th>Status abroad</th><th>Lesson for Sweden</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03252 detainee benefit restrictions</strong></td><td>Denmark 2015 "jewelry law" for asylum seekers; Netherlands 2016 detention-conditions restrictions</td><td>State-to-individual coercion layered onto migration/justice framework</td><td>DK: operational but litigated; NL: partially overturned in Raad van State</td><td>Proportionality safeguards essential; ECHR filings follow with 12–24 mo lag</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03253 CRR3/CRD6 transposition</strong></td><td>Germany Kapitaladäquanzverordnung transposition 2024–25; Finland Laki luottolaitostoiminnasta update</td><td>EU prudential package</td><td>DE: transposition complete but with interpretive guidance; FI: on track</td><td>Sweden has options: straight transposition (clean) vs. gold-plated (risk-averse). Germany's interpretive-guidance route balances speed + market clarity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03256 tachograph regulation</strong></td><td>Germany/Netherlands parallel implementation</td><td>EU transport package</td><td>Both on track</td><td>Routine; low policy risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU23 migration law bifurcation</strong></td><td>Denmark bifurcated protection regime (2019); Germany Ankerzentrum framework</td><td>Two-track migration architecture</td><td>DK: stable, critiqued on rights; DE: partial</td><td>Operational complexity is the bottleneck, not legal design</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU25 prison capacity expansion</strong></td><td>Norway tendencies 2023–25 (delayed); Finland capacity plans</td><td>Criminal-justice capacity</td><td>NO: capacity expansion slower than policy targets; FI: modest expansion</td><td>Capacity delivery rarely keeps pace with sentencing-policy changes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10447 SME sick-pay reimbursement</strong></td><td>Norway sykepenger (permanent); Finland sairausvakuutus redesign 2022</td><td>SME labor-cost redistribution</td><td>NO: stable; FI: mildly reduced state share</td><td>SME sick-pay is persistent pre-election lever in Nordic politics</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU23 Riksbank annual review</strong></td><td>Norges Bank annual report; Bank of Finland governance</td><td>Central-bank oversight</td><td>Both: routine and non-controversial</td><td>Sweden's latent political interest in Riksbank independence is distinctive in Nordic context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024082 drivmedel (fuel tax)</strong></td><td>Norway 2022 drivstoff debates; Germany Tankrabatt 2022</td><td>Fuel-cost political pressure</td><td>NO: recurring campaign issue; DE: short-term subsidies withdrawn</td><td>Fuel-tax politics is highly cyclical — rarely decides elections alone</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096 krigsmateriel export ban (MP motion)</strong></td><td>Germany SPD/Greens coalition 2021 debates; Norway 2024 export restrictions</td><td>Arms-export ethics</td><td>DE: eventual tightening; NO: selective tightening</td><td>Ethical-wedge motions rarely pass but reshape party positioning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö pre-election legacy sprint</strong></td><td>Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election bill push; Germany Scholz 2024 pre-election push</td><td>Pre-election legacy legislation</td><td>DK: effective, Frederiksen re-elected; DE: ineffective, SPD lost</td><td>Pre-election legacy pushes help coalitions that have successfully delivered; hurt those with unfulfilled promises</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-case-patterns">Cross-case patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-case-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet">Pattern 1 — "Rights restrictions + migration = litigation magnet"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-case-patterns">Cross-case patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-case-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet">Pattern 1 — "Rights restrictions + migration = litigation magnet"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet"></a></h4>
 <p>HD03252 + HD01SfU23 follow the Danish and Dutch template of tightening state coercion on migration/justice populations. In both comparator cases:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Implementation was operational within 12–18 months.</li>
@@ -3494,13 +3481,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet">Pattern
 <li>Political durability depended on whether rights-based critique could be reframed as "rule-of-law strengthening".</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Implication for Sweden</strong>: Expect the same trajectory — operational before election, litigation after. The political question is whether the Tidö coalition can frame enforcement as strengthening rule-of-law rather than eroding rights.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political">Pattern 2 — "EU prudential transposition is administrative, not political"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political">Pattern 2 — "EU prudential transposition is administrative, not political"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political"></a></h4>
 <p>HD03253 CRR3/CRD6 transposition: Germany and Finland demonstrate that prudential transposition rarely becomes a public controversy. <strong>If Sweden slips the deadline, the issue becomes visibility for EU institutional critique — not voter salience.</strong> This is a <strong>regulatory risk, not electoral risk</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive">Pattern 3 — "Fuel-tax politics are durable but rarely decisive"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive">Pattern 3 — "Fuel-tax politics are durable but rarely decisive"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive"></a></h4>
 <p>HD024082: Fuel-tax debates are common in Nordic pre-election windows but have not independently flipped an election in the comparator set. Combined with sick-pay (HD10447), they acquire more salience. S's strategy is to bundle these into a cost-of-living omnibus narrative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden">Pattern 4 — "Central-bank independence — latent but unique to Sweden"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden">Pattern 4 — "Central-bank independence — latent but unique to Sweden"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden"></a></h4>
 <p>HD01FiU23: Norway and Finland have not shown political appetite for reviewing central-bank independence. Sweden's latent willingness (SD history) makes this the <strong>only uniquely Swedish institutional risk</strong> in today's batch.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed">Nordic comparator matrix (condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed">Nordic comparator matrix (condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3549,57 +3536,56 @@ <h2 id="rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed">Nordic comparator matrix (condens
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>DK</th><th>NO</th><th>FI</th><th>SE today</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election coalition discipline</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td>HIGH (SD zero motions)</td></tr><tr><td>Migration restriction maturity</td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Central-bank politicization risk</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>SME sick-pay politics</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative throughput in pre-election quarter</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (today = top-5% day)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-eu-level-comparator">EU-level comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-level-comparator"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-level-comparator">EU-level comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-level-comparator"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CRR3/CRD6</strong>: 25/27 member states on track; Sweden currently flag-yellow on timeline.</li>
 <li><strong>ECHR litigation volume</strong>: Sweden historically low (per capita); HD03252 could raise the profile.</li>
 <li><strong>Tachograph compliance</strong>: Routine; no EU risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-comparative-observation">Key comparative observation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-comparative-observation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-comparative-observation">Key comparative observation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-comparative-observation"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's distinguishing feature in this reporting day is not any single policy — each has a Nordic or EU parallel — but the <strong>simultaneous layering</strong> of rights, banking, migration, and fiscal items on a single day. The Danish 2015 "jewellery-law" day was a single-issue spectacle; the German 2024 pre-election push was fiscally concentrated. <strong>Sweden 2026-04-24 is unusual in scope and rhythm combined.</strong></p>
-<p><em>Source: cross-case synthesis drawing on sibling folder comparative analyses + Nordic/EU institutional knowledge from prior monthly-reviews.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Place today's reporting signals in historical context — Swedish and Nordic parliamentary history, with disciplined analogical reasoning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swedish-historical-parallels">Swedish historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994">Parallel 1 — Pre-election sprint of Bildt 1994<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swedish-historical-parallels">Swedish historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-historical-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994">Parallel 1 — Pre-election sprint of Bildt 1994<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Carl Bildt's coalition government in spring 1994 similarly pushed a concentrated reform agenda before the autumn 1994 election.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: Bildt had a weaker parliamentary base; Tidöavtalet has SD support-party architecture.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Concentrated pre-election reform agendas can project competence but require delivery proof — Bildt lost, partly on unemployment. Today's coalition must avoid a similar fate on cost-of-living.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy">Parallel 2 — Reinfeldt 2010 pre-election legacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy">Parallel 2 — Reinfeldt 2010 pre-election legacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Fredrik Reinfeldt's 2010 pre-election legacy-consolidation — tax reforms, school reforms, healthcare standards.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: Reinfeldt held two mandates already; Tidöavtalet is first-mandate.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Legacy consolidation worked for Reinfeldt in 2010 but not in 2014. Today's coalition is in a first-mandate position structurally similar to 2010.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis">Parallel 3 — Löfven 2018 pre-formation crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis">Parallel 3 — Löfven 2018 pre-formation crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: 134-day government formation in late 2018–early 2019 demonstrates that Swedish politics tolerates extended formation.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: If the Sept 2026 election produces fragmentation, formation could again be protracted — S's interpellation strategy (HD10447) could become important for post-election bargaining.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited">Parallel 4 — Persson 2006 SME sick-pay revisited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited">Parallel 4 — Persson 2006 SME sick-pay revisited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Göran Persson's government made SME sick-pay a campaign issue in 2006. Outcome: S lost narrowly.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: SME sick-pay (HD10447) is a recurring Swedish campaign axis. Historical base rate suggests it shifts about 1–2 pp but rarely decides elections alone.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul">Parallel 5 — Riksbank Act 2022 overhaul<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul">Parallel 5 — Riksbank Act 2022 overhaul<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Sweden's 2022 Riksbank Act overhaul was the largest institutional change to central-bank governance in decades.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: It was bipartisan.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Riksbank governance rarely polarizes — but if HD01FiU23 opens a political-oversight debate, this would be a <strong>break from the 2022 consensus pattern</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-historical-parallels">Nordic historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push">Parallel 6 — Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election push<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-historical-parallels">Nordic historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-historical-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push">Parallel 6 — Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election push<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Mette Frederiksen's SD government pushed a concentrated pre-election agenda on immigration and welfare in 2019, benefiting from the 2018 sentiment shift.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: SD had just emerged; Frederiksen's base was more centrist.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Pre-election legacy-push succeeded when backed by consistent narrative. Today's Tidöavtalet has discipline (SD) but risks narrative fragmentation (L's quiet absence).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat">Parallel 7 — Norway Solberg 2021 defeat<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat">Parallel 7 — Norway Solberg 2021 defeat<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Erna Solberg's coalition lost 2021 election despite visible pre-election activity.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Legislative throughput alone is insufficient. What matters is how throughput is framed — Solberg's 2021 messaging was diffuse; Frederiksen's 2019 was concentrated.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory">Parallel 8 — Finland Orpo 2023 victory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory">Parallel 8 — Finland Orpo 2023 victory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Petteri Orpo's coalition came to power in 2023 on a very similar M-KD-SD-like framework (Kokoomus-PS-KD-RKP).
 <strong>Relevant lesson</strong>: Fiscal-discipline narrative + coalition-partner-of-confidence strategy can carry centre-right coalitions through pre-election periods — especially if SD-equivalent party maintains support-party discipline. <strong>This is the most direct positive analogue for Sweden's coalition.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-legal-historical-parallels">Legal-historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt">Parallel 9 — 2011 migration bifurcation attempt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-legal-historical-parallels">Legal-historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-historical-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt">Parallel 9 — 2011 migration bifurcation attempt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: The 2011 Reinfeldt coalition attempted a bifurcated protection regime for migrants; aborted by political-complexity concerns.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: Today's HD01SfU23 is a committee report working on a similar structural idea, with an SD support architecture that was unavailable in 2011.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: What was legally possible but politically infeasible in 2011 may now be achievable — but at the cost of litigation trail.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s">Parallel 10 — ECHR cases against Sweden (2010s)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s">Parallel 10 — ECHR cases against Sweden (2010s)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Sweden has received a handful of ECHR adverse judgments on migration/asylum matters in the 2010s, consistently with proportionality gaps.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Proportionality safeguards added before enactment reduce ECHR exposure substantially — a pre-3rd-reading amendment to HD03252 could move KJ-5 confidence from MEDIUM (55–70%) to LOW (15–30%).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-base-rate-summary">Historical-base-rate summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-base-rate-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-base-rate-summary">Historical-base-rate summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-base-rate-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3641,13 +3627,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-base-rate-summary">Historical-base-rate summary<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Class of event</th><th>Historical base rate</th><th>Today's evidence lean</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election legacy sprint succeeding</td><td>50–60% (4/7 in Nordic cases since 2000)</td><td>Narrative consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Pre-election cost-of-living wedge deciding election</td><td>10–15% (1/7 cases)</td><td>Wedge exists, not decisive alone</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture in final 6 months before election</td><td>25–30%</td><td>L structural position high-risk</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR adverse judgment within 24 months of enactment</td><td>20–30% (Swedish rights legislation)</td><td>HD03252 fits pattern</td></tr><tr><td>EU transposition deadline miss</td><td>8–15%</td><td>HD03253 within risk band</td></tr><tr><td>Central-bank politicization debate triggered</td><td>&#x3C; 5% (post-2000)</td><td>HD01FiU23 latent only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning">Conclusion from historical reasoning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning">Conclusion from historical reasoning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's reporting day fits recurrent Swedish + Nordic patterns but with one distinctive feature: the <strong>simultaneous layering of four policy axes</strong> (rights, banking, migration, fiscal) on a single reporting day. In 25 years of post-2000 Nordic pre-election pushes, single-axis concentration is the norm. A four-axis push is a high-stakes gambit: if executed, it creates a legacy; if any axis breaks, it creates cascading doubt.</p>
-<p><em>Source: Historical synthesis from general Swedish/Nordic parliamentary record; not primary-source queried this cycle.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 4-dimension feasibility assessment (Operational × Fiscal × Legal × Political) per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 7</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items">Feasibility matrix — top legislative items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items">Feasibility matrix — top legislative items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3734,44 +3719,44 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items">Feasibility matrix — top
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Operational</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>Legal</th><th>Political</th><th>Overall</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03252</strong> detainee benefits</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Kriminalvården must scale</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — modest cost</td><td><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong> — ECHR risk</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — L flank</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03253</strong> CRR3/CRD6 transposition</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — FI already prepared</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — redistribution not new cost</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — EU-mandated</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — unified coalition</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03256</strong> tachograph</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — routine</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — minimal</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — EU-mandated</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03104</strong> debt-management skr</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — routine</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU25</strong> prison capacity</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — capacity gap</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — cost</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU23</strong> migration bifurcation</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Migrationsverket</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — rights-regime</td><td><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU23</strong> Riksbank review</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — annual</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — latent risk</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10447</strong> SME sick-pay (proposal from interpellation)</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>LOW</strong> — fiscal cost</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>LOW</strong> — government opposed</td><td><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong> krigsmateriel ban</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — WTO/EU considerations</td><td><strong>LOW</strong></td><td><strong>LOW</strong> (if reached vote)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-risk-by-item">Implementation risk by item<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-risk-by-item"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility">HD03252 (detainee benefits) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-risk-by-item">Implementation risk by item<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-risk-by-item"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility">HD03252 (detainee benefits) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Kriminalvården must redesign benefit-delivery systems. Capacity expansion required (HD01CU25 tie-in).
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Manageable — estimated ~ 50–150 MSEK in implementation costs.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: ECHR proportionality test is the binding constraint. If proportionality amendment absent, 15–30% chance of adverse ECtHR judgment within 30 months (per <code>devils-advocate.md</code> ACH).
 <strong>Political path</strong>: L flank is the binding risk. Pre-3rd-reading amendment signals probable (coalition incentive to avoid fracture).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility">HD03253 (EU banking) — HIGH feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility">HD03253 (EU banking) — HIGH feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: FI operationally ready; transposition is regulatory-text work.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: RWA redistribution is industry-internal; no fiscal cost to Treasury.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: EU-mandated; no domestic legal challenge vector.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: Unified coalition + silent S + supportive C. Opposition on ideological grounds limited to V.
 <strong>Binding constraint</strong>: Parliamentary calendar. If FiU schedules by 2026-05-15, probability of on-time transposition > 85%.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility">HD01CU25 (prison capacity) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility">HD01CU25 (prison capacity) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Capacity scaling is real and challenging. Q2 report will reveal if plan is achievable.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Costed in current budget cycle; no new funds.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: Uncontested.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: Broad majority support.
 <strong>Binding constraint</strong>: Actual ability to commission beds per timeline.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility">HD10447 (SME sick-pay, if converted to motion) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility">HD10447 (SME sick-pay, if converted to motion) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Redesign of Försäkringskassan reimbursement rules.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Estimated 500–1500 MSEK/year in reimbursements — politically charged cost.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: Straightforward.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: Government refuses under current coalition math. Opposition push for campaign narrative value, not immediate legislation.
 <strong>Implementation realistic only post-2026 election under S government</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility">HD024096 (krigsmateriel export ban) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility">HD024096 (krigsmateriel export ban) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Redesign of ISP approval regime. Significant.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Indirect costs via industrial contraction.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: Potential WTO and EU considerations.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: No government majority; symbolic vote.
 <strong>Implementation realistic only under a different coalition</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap">Capacity-versus-ambition gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap">Capacity-versus-ambition gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap"></a></h3>
 <p>The key finding: today's legislative ambition <strong>exceeds</strong> current administrative capacity in two places:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Kriminalvården</strong> (HD03252 × HD01CU25) — bed capacity plan tight</li>
 <li><strong>Migrationsverket</strong> (HD01SfU23) — bifurcation operationalization complex</li>
 </ol>
 <p>Capacity gaps do not prevent enactment but create operational-risk pathways (R3, R7 in <code>risk-assessment.md</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-fiscal-absorption">Fiscal absorption<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-absorption"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fiscal-absorption">Fiscal absorption<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-absorption"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3814,7 +3799,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-fiscal-absorption">Fiscal absorption<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Est. direct cost 2026–2028 (MSEK)</th><th>Budget line</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03252 implementation</td><td>50–150</td><td>Justitiedept + Kriminalvården</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU25 capacity expansion</td><td>1500–2500</td><td>Kriminalvården</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU23 operationalization</td><td>200–500</td><td>Migrationsverket</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253 transposition</td><td>10–30 (regulatory)</td><td>FI</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256 tachograph</td><td>10–30</td><td>Transportstyrelsen</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104 debt mgmt</td><td>0 (informational)</td><td>Riksgälden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total new estimated direct fiscal exposure</strong>: ~ 2.0–3.2 BSEK 2026–2028 — modest against national budget; concentrated in justice + migration lines.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping">Capacity bottleneck mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping">Capacity bottleneck mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   HD03252 --> KV["Kriminalvården\n(capacity)"]
   HD01CU25 --> KV
@@ -3826,19 +3811,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping">Capacity bottleneck mapping<a class="" a
   classDef nominal fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#0a0e27
   class KV,MV bottleneck
   class FI,TS,RB nominal</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion">Implementation-feasibility conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion">Implementation-feasibility conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion"></a></h3>
 <p>Of the four PM-signed propositions, <strong>HD03253, HD03256, and HD03104</strong> are structurally feasible with high confidence. <strong>HD03252</strong> is feasible but depends on capacity delivery at Kriminalvården and proportionality safeguards. The committee reports are similarly tiered — FiU23 and CU25 are high-feasibility; SfU23 faces operational risk.</p>
 <p>The <strong>opposition motion cluster</strong> is structurally infeasible under current coalition math — these motions are campaign-signal tools, not immediate legislative risks.</p>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of sibling implementation-feasibility sections + operational-knowledge cross-reference.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) per Heuer, plus formal devil's-advocate challenge to the base narrative (ICD 203 Standard 9).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims">The base narrative (what the synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims">The base narrative (what the synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Tidö coalition is running a coordinated pre-election legacy sprint — 4 PM-signed propositions + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations on one day. SD discipline is intact (zero motions). Opposition has atomized into 4 separate arcs (S economy, V rights, MP ethics, C migration-flank). The day reveals a high-confidence political-rhythm reading."</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination">H1 — "Calendar coincidence, not coordination"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination">H1 — "Calendar coincidence, not coordination"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 4-prop + 5-bet + 16-ip concentration is a calendar-rhythm coincidence driven by committee deadlines, session pacing, and parliamentary filing windows — not a deliberately orchestrated sprint.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3853,7 +3837,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination">H1 — "Calendar coinciden
 <li>SD zero motions against 9 bills is statistically distinctive.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: H1 accounts for 15–25% of variance. The baseline narrative (H0) is still more parsimonious.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal">H2 — "Coalition-fragility signal, not confidence signal"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal">H2 — "Coalition-fragility signal, not confidence signal"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The PM-signature concentration is not a sign of confidence but of <strong>crisis management</strong> — the PM personally shepherds bills because ministerial trust is low, not high. L's absence from lead roles is not structural; it is a current crisis.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3868,7 +3852,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal">H2 — "Coaliti
 <li>SD's zero motions contradicts fragility reading — fragile coalitions would leak.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: H2 accounts for 10–15% of variance. A latent warning to monitor, not the primary reading.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint">H3 — "Strategic convergence, not sprint"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint">H3 — "Strategic convergence, not sprint"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The appearance of a "sprint" is a retrospective frame. What the coalition is doing is <strong>routine legacy consolidation</strong> — bills that have been in pipeline for 6–18 months happen to mature at similar cadence. The political-rhythm reading assigns strategy to what is pipeline physics.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3882,9 +3866,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint">H3 — "Strategic convergence,
 <li>PM personal signing is not routine; it is selective.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: H3 accounts for 20–30% of variance. Part-true but incomplete.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint">H0 — The base narrative ("coordinated pre-election legacy sprint")<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint">H0 — The base narrative ("coordinated pre-election legacy sprint")<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint"></a></h4>
 <p>Still carries 55–65% of variance — the most parsimonious explanation combining signing-pattern + SD-discipline + opposition-atomization + effective-date clustering.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3963,7 +3947,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>H0 (sprint)</th><th>H1 (coincidence)</th><th>H2 (fragility)</th><th>H3 (convergence)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PM personally signs 4 props</td><td>++</td><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>Effective dates cluster summer 2026</td><td>++</td><td>-</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>SD zero counter-motions</td><td>++</td><td>0</td><td>--</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>No L lead ministers</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>++</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>16 interpellations in 72h</td><td>+</td><td>+</td><td>+</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>Summer-recess compression</td><td>+</td><td>++</td><td>0</td><td>++</td></tr><tr><td>Drivmedel cluster 3-party coordination</td><td>+</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR-latent proportionality gap</td><td>+</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>Sibling-folder consistency (4 independent narratives converge)</td><td>++</td><td>--</td><td>-</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Legend: ++ strong support · + moderate support · 0 neutral · - mild contradiction · -- strong contradiction</p>
 <p><strong>Weighted ACH result</strong>: H0 dominates (+11) vs H1 (-2), H2 (+1), H3 (+3). H3 is the most viable alternative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-falsification-tests">Falsification tests<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-falsification-tests"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-falsification-tests">Falsification tests<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-falsification-tests"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>For H0 to be falsified</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>SD files a counter-motion on any of the 9 active bills within 30 days</li>
@@ -3976,7 +3960,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-falsification-tests">Falsification tests<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>Historical average shows that 4 PM-signed bills in one day is normal (it is not — this is top-1% rare)</li>
 <li>Other Nordic or EU governments show identical cyclic pattern</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking">Red-team challenge to the DIW ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking">Red-team challenge to the DIW ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Challenge</strong>: "You rank HD10447 (single interpellation) at DIW 3.85, higher than HD03253 (EU-mandated transposition) at 3.80. This is wrong — an interpellation is non-binding, a transposition is legally binding."</p>
 <p><strong>Response (after red team check)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3986,7 +3970,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking">Red-team challenge to the DIW
 <li>The two are near-tied (3.85 vs 3.80); the ranking is sensitive to ±0.1 perturbation.</li>
 <li><strong>Concession</strong>: If the audience is legal/market, HD03253 should be first. If political-strategy, HD10447 first. The synthesis leads with HD03253 on consequence grounds — this resolves the apparent contradiction.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-alternative-framework-check">Alternative-framework check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-framework-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alternative-framework-check">Alternative-framework check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-framework-check"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If we apply a pure legalist framework (rather than political-rhythm)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Ranking becomes: HD03253 > HD03252 > HD01FiU23 > HD03256 > HD01CU25 > HD03104 > HD10447 > motions cluster</li>
@@ -4000,12 +3984,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-alternative-framework-check">Alternative-framework check<a class="" a
 <li>Narrative shifts to "coercive-authority expansion quarter"</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The choice of framework matters. The base narrative has been tested under three framings; the political-rhythm framing best accommodates all the evidence.</p>
-<p><em>Source: internal devil's-advocate challenge; ACH matrix per Heuer ICD 203-compliant methodology; red-team ranking challenge.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 7-dimension taxonomy per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 3 · Classification</code>.
 Dimensions: Topic · Stakeholder · Urgency · Scope · Impact · Controversy · Decision-lens.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix">Top-tier document classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix">Top-tier document classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4122,8 +4105,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix">Top-tier document classifica
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Topic</th><th>Primary stakeholder</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Scope</th><th>Impact</th><th>Controversy</th><th>Decision-lens</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03253</strong></td><td>EU-mandated banking prudential transposition (CRR3/CRD6)</td><td>Regulators + 4 major banks + SME credit</td><td>HIGH (EU deadline)</td><td>Domestic + EU compliance</td><td>HIGH — capital requirements</td><td>MEDIUM — technical</td><td>Committee schedule + transposition design</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03252</strong></td><td>Coercive-authority expansion (detainee benefit restrictions)</td><td>Civil-liberty NGOs + detainees + prison staff</td><td>MEDIUM (1 Aug 2026)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>HIGH — rights regime</td><td>HIGH — L flank, V opposition</td><td>Parliamentary proportionality amendment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10447</strong></td><td>Fiscal redistribution — SME sick-pay reimbursement</td><td>SMEs + employer organizations + S strategy team</td><td>MEDIUM (2026-05-07)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — small but symbolic fiscal</td><td>MEDIUM — campaign wedge</td><td>Minister Busch public response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU25</strong></td><td>Criminal justice — prison capacity</td><td>Kriminalvården + JuU + CU</td><td>MEDIUM (Q2 review)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>HIGH — operational</td><td>LOW — bipartisan floor</td><td>Bed-count audit</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024082</strong></td><td>Energy/fuel pricing regulation</td><td>S fiscal team + motor-industry + consumers</td><td>MEDIUM (summer recess)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — consumer</td><td>MEDIUM — classic left-right</td><td>Summer-recess debate scheduling</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU23</strong></td><td>Migration law bifurcation</td><td>Migrationsverket + SfU + civil society</td><td>MEDIUM (Q2)</td><td>Domestic + EU</td><td>HIGH — bifurcated rights regime</td><td>HIGH — L/MP flank</td><td>Bifurcation threshold</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU23</strong></td><td>Central-bank oversight</td><td>Riksbank + FiU + markets</td><td>LOW (annual cycle)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — credibility</td><td>LOW (today) but latent</td><td>Independence-debate trigger</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03256</strong></td><td>Transport regulation (tachograph)</td><td>Transport industry + TU</td><td>LOW (routine)</td><td>Domestic + EU harmonization</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>Committee passage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong></td><td>Arms-export ethics</td><td>MP ethical-policy team + UU + defense industry</td><td>LOW (signaling)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>LOW (no majority)</td><td>MEDIUM — moral-wedge</td><td>Coalition-fracture test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03104</strong></td><td>Debt-management skr</td><td>FiU + Riksgälden</td><td>LOW (annual)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — fiscal credibility</td><td>LOW</td><td>Budget-context framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-topic-clustering">Topic clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-topic-clustering"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion">Cluster A · Coercive-authority expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-topic-clustering">Topic clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-topic-clustering"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion">Cluster A · Coercive-authority expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03252 (detainee benefits)</li>
 <li>HD01CU25 (prison capacity)</li>
@@ -4131,7 +4114,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion">Cluster A · Coercive-author
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: State-to-individual coercion in the Tidöavtalet framework</li>
 <li><strong>Cluster controversy</strong>: HIGH (L + V + MP + civil liberty NGOs active)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional">Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional">Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03253 (EU banking)</li>
 <li>HD01FiU23 (Riksbank)</li>
@@ -4139,27 +4122,27 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional">Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: Macro-institutional architecture</li>
 <li><strong>Cluster controversy</strong>: MEDIUM (technical debates, ideological latent)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography">Cluster C · Opposition economic counter-choreography<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography">Cluster C · Opposition economic counter-choreography<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD024082 + HD024092 + HD024098 (drivmedel)</li>
 <li>HD10447 + 11 other S interpellations</li>
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: S-led cost-of-living campaign sequencing</li>
 <li><strong>Cluster controversy</strong>: MEDIUM (classic left-right but high pre-election salience)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput">Cluster D · Low-controversy throughput<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput">Cluster D · Low-controversy throughput<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03256 (tachograph)</li>
 <li>HD01AU15 (ILO)</li>
 <li>HD01CU29 (EV infrastructure)</li>
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: Routine EU-harmonization or bipartisan passages</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-urgency-distribution">Urgency distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-urgency-distribution">Urgency distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-distribution"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH (within 30 days of action trigger)</strong>: 1 · HD03253</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM (within 90 days)</strong>: 6 · HD03252, HD10447, HD01CU25, HD024082, HD01SfU23, (drivmedel cluster)</li>
 <li><strong>LOW (routine cycle)</strong>: 10 · remaining items</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-coverage-map">Stakeholder coverage map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-coverage-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-coverage-map">Stakeholder coverage map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-coverage-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4210,13 +4193,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-coverage-map">Stakeholder coverage map<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Count of today's dokuments touching them</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Civil-liberty / rights NGOs</td><td>4 (HD03252, HD01SfU23, HD01CU25, utvisning cluster)</td></tr><tr><td>Banking and financial sector</td><td>2 (HD03253, HD01FiU23)</td></tr><tr><td>SMEs and employer organizations</td><td>2 (HD10447, indirectly HD024082)</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition S apparatus</td><td>16+ (interpellation stream + drivmedel)</td></tr><tr><td>Kriminalvården</td><td>2 (HD03252, HD01CU25)</td></tr><tr><td>Transport industry</td><td>1 (HD03256)</td></tr><tr><td>Defense industry</td><td>1 (HD024096)</td></tr><tr><td>Consumers (motor fuel)</td><td>1 (HD024082 cluster)</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>2 (HD03253, HD01SfU23)</td></tr><tr><td>Markets / investors</td><td>3 (HD01FiU23, HD03253, HD03104)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4">Cross-classification coverage check (ICD 203 Standard 4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4">Cross-classification coverage check (ICD 203 Standard 4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 19 consolidated dok_ids appear in at least one row above.</li>
 <li>All top-5 DIW items (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252, HD01CU25, HD024082) appear in the top block.</li>
 <li>No dok_id appears in more than one cluster without explicit cross-reference (Cluster A — HD01SfU23; Cluster C — HD024082; handled as cluster-level memberships only).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-lens-output">Decision-lens output<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-lens-output"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-lens-output">Decision-lens output<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-lens-output"></a></h3>
 <p>For each high-DIW item, the <strong>single decision</strong> this classification enables:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03253</strong>: Should FiU schedule a hearing before 2026-05-15? → PIR-1.</li>
@@ -4225,11 +4208,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-lens-output">Decision-lens output<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>HD01CU25</strong>: Will Q2 Kriminalvården capacity report confirm the +5200 bed plan? → PIR-5.</li>
 <li><strong>HD024082 + cluster</strong>: Will a formal summer-recess fuel-price interpellation round be scheduled? → Watchlist.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling classification-results.md files; cross-type topic-cluster synthesis.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Function</strong>: Traceability web linking every claim to source artifacts per Tier-C aggregation contract.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-internal-artifact-dependencies">Internal artifact dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-internal-artifact-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-internal-artifact-dependencies">Internal artifact dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-internal-artifact-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
   DM[data-download-manifest] --> EB[executive-brief]
   EB --> SS[synthesis-summary]
@@ -4253,9 +4235,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-internal-artifact-dependencies">Internal artifact dependencies<a clas
   IF --> FI[forward-indicators]
   FI --> CRM[cross-reference-map]
   CRM --> README[README]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory">Sibling-folder citations (Tier-C mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory">Sibling-folder citations (Tier-C mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory"></a></h3>
 <p>Evening analysis aggregates and cross-references today's four single-type analyses. Sibling paths — all under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code>:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — coalition prop-signing pattern</li>
@@ -4264,7 +4246,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/
 <li><code>devils-advocate.md</code> — H1/H2/H3 on sprint thesis</li>
 <li><code>forward-indicators.md</code> — PIR-1 anchor date</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>classification-results.md</code> — S/V/MP motion clustering</li>
@@ -4273,21 +4255,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motio
 <li><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code> — campaign-narrative mapping</li>
 <li><code>voter-segmentation.md</code> — segment targeting per motion</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> — CU25/SfU23/FiU23/AU15/CU29 committee-floor signal</li>
 <li><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> — coalition durability per committee signal</li>
 <li><code>methodology-reflection.md</code> — committee-floor-signal methodology</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — S-party 12-of-16 interpellation-filing dominance</li>
 <li><code>significance-scoring.md</code> — HD10447 SME sick-pay tier placement</li>
 <li><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code> — Aftonbladet amplification</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims">Claim-to-source matrix (high-value claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims">Claim-to-source matrix (high-value claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4349,7 +4331,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims">Claim-to-source matrix (hig
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim in evening-analysis</th><th>Source artifact</th><th>Source folder</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Tidö pre-election legacy sprint" thesis</td><td>synthesis-summary</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"SD zero-motions day = discipline intact"</td><td>motions/classification-results</td><td>motions</td></tr><tr><td>"Prison-capacity bottleneck for HD03252"</td><td>committeeReports/scenario-analysis</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>"S dominates interpellation filings 12-of-16"</td><td>interpellations/executive-brief</td><td>interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>"HD03253 HIGH feasibility transposition"</td><td>propositions/implementation-feasibility</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>"L flank = binding political constraint"</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"4 scenarios sum to 1.00"</td><td>scenario-analysis</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"PIR-1 anchor: FiU schedule by 2026-05-15"</td><td>propositions/forward-indicators</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>"Coalition math Ja/Nej breakdown per dok_id"</td><td>coalition-mathematics</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"Historical parallel: 2005/2018 pre-election sprints"</td><td>historical-parallels</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-external-authoritative-sources">External authoritative sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-authoritative-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-authoritative-sources">External authoritative sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-authoritative-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4396,32 +4378,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-authoritative-sources">External authoritative sources<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Source</th><th>Usage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Regeringen.se</td><td>SOU 2025:* propositions</td><td>Legal-text reference for HD03252, HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdagen.se</td><td>Dokument.se</td><td>Dok-id resolution, text of motions</td></tr><tr><td>DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen</td><td>Editorial page</td><td>Framing context</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR</td><td>hudoc.echr.coe.int</td><td>HD03252 proportionality precedent</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>CRR3/CRD6 directive</td><td>HD03253 transposition context</td></tr><tr><td>SCB</td><td>Statistics Sweden</td><td>Base-rate referents</td></tr><tr><td>ISP</td><td>Inspektionen för strategiska produkter</td><td>HD024091/96 export-control context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-ingestion">Prior-cycle ingestion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-ingestion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-ingestion">Prior-cycle ingestion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-ingestion"></a></h3>
 <p>Per Tier-C contract, today's analysis ingests <strong>prior-cycle PIRs</strong> from:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/</code> (prior day's evening-analysis, if present) — see <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></li>
 <li><code>analysis/weekly/2026-W17/</code> (prior-week review, if present) — see <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></li>
 <li><code>analysis/monthly/2026-04/</code> (April monthly review, if present) — see <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-reference-targets">Forward-reference targets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-reference-targets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-reference-targets">Forward-reference targets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-reference-targets"></a></h3>
 <p>This evening-analysis cascade will feed forward to:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/weekly/2026-W17/</code> (end-of-week review)</li>
 <li><code>analysis/monthly/2026-04/</code> (end-of-April review)</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-09-*/</code> (election-period analyses)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-traceability-verification">Traceability verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-traceability-verification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-traceability-verification">Traceability verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-traceability-verification"></a></h3>
 <p>Every Key Judgment (KJ1–KJ7) in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> links to ≥ 2 sibling artifacts.
 Every scenario (S1–S4) in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> links to ≥ 1 PIR in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>.
 Every risk (R1–R15) in <code>risk-assessment.md</code> links to ≥ 1 threat in <code>threat-analysis.md</code> or stakeholder in <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code>.
 Every forward indicator (F1–F20) in <code>forward-indicators.md</code> links to ≥ 1 PIR in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>No orphan claims detected.</strong></p>
-<p><em>Source: Internal artifact graph + sibling-folder ingestion table.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Self-audit against ICD 203 + Admiralty + WEP standards; explicit Methodology Improvements for next-cycle application.
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling</p>
-<h2 id="rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied">Compliance matrix — tradecraft standards applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied">Compliance matrix — tradecraft standards applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4506,7 +4487,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied">Compliance matrix 
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Standard</th><th>Requirement</th><th>Where applied in this artifact set</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 1 (Objective)</td><td>No partisan framing</td><td>Every KJ audited against party-neutrality test</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 2 (Independent sources)</td><td>≥ 2 independent sources per KJ</td><td>Sibling folder + primary document evidence chains</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 3 (Timely)</td><td>Every claim tied to time horizon</td><td>All PIRs have explicit deadlines</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 4 (All available sources)</td><td>Evidence diversity</td><td>4 sibling folders + MCP live-check + cached IMF/SCB</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 5 (Tradecraft)</td><td>SATs used</td><td>Kent Scale, Admiralty, ACH, Red Team all applied</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 6 (Quality + credibility)</td><td>Source descriptors</td><td>Admiralty codes A1/B2/C3 on every KJ</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 7 (Uncertainty)</td><td>Explicit probability language</td><td>5-level + Kent Scale ranges</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 8 (Assumptions vs judgments)</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>Table in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 9 (Alternatives)</td><td>ACH + alternatives</td><td><code>devils-advocate.md</code> with H1/H2/H3</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Admiralty system</td><td>Source reliability (A-F) × information credibility (1-6)</td><td>Applied throughout classification + KJs</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>WEP / Kent Scale</td><td>Verbal-probability-to-numeric calibration</td><td>Highly likely = 70–85%; possible = 30–45%</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Structured Analytic Techniques</td><td>ACH, Red Team, Devil's Advocate, Key Assumptions Check, SWOT, TOWS</td><td>All applied across artifact set</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit">Party-neutrality arithmetic audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit">Party-neutrality arithmetic audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>Count of party mentions across the 23 artifacts (indicative):</p>
 
 
@@ -4560,7 +4541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit">Party-neutrality arithmetic audit<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Count</th><th>Framed neutrally</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>38</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>22</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>18</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>18</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>14</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>12</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>10</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Audit conclusion</strong>: All 8 parties mentioned; 8/8 framed in terms of observable actions and strategic-logic interpretation, not moral judgment. The ratio of opposition-to-government mentions (74:74) is perfectly balanced — though this is not a virtue in itself, it reflects the day's genuine political symmetry.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling">Ambiguity and uncertainty handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling">Ambiguity and uncertainty handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling"></a></h3>
 <p>Where today's artifacts deploy explicit uncertainty markers:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>"Highly likely"</strong> (70–85%): 5 uses</li>
@@ -4570,24 +4551,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling">Ambiguity and uncertainty handlin
 <li><strong>"Remote"</strong> (&#x3C; 15%): 1 use (HD01FiU23 → Riksbank independence debate escalation)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Prohibition check</strong>: ✅ No weasel words ("could", "may", "some analysts suggest") without a numeric anchor.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-strengths-observed">Methodology strengths observed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-strengths-observed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-strengths-observed">Methodology strengths observed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-strengths-observed"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Cross-type synthesis</strong> is structurally superior to any single-type analysis — the pre-election-sprint reading emerges only by joining prop + motion + bet + ip.</li>
 <li><strong>SD zero-motion silence</strong> was treated as positive evidence (high DIW null-event) rather than absence — a tradecraft maturity marker.</li>
 <li><strong>Prior-cycle PIR ingestion</strong> was completed (Tier-C requirement) — no orphan PIRs remain from prior cycles.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <p>Three named improvements for the next reporting cycle:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index">Methodology Improvement 1 — <strong>Quantitative coalition-discipline index</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index">Methodology Improvement 1 — <strong>Quantitative coalition-discipline index</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index"></a></h4>
 <p>Today I inferred "SD discipline intact" from a zero-motion count over 72 hours. A more rigorous measurement would construct a discipline index over a rolling 30-day window comparing SD motion-filing rate against prior Tidö periods and the 2022–2026 mandate baseline.</p>
 <p><strong>Action for next run</strong>: Build <code>scripts/coalition-discipline-index.ts</code> using <code>riksdag-regering-search_dokument</code> with filter <code>parti=SD</code> + <code>doktyp=mot</code> + rolling window. Record baseline and today's delta.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments">Methodology Improvement 2 — <strong>ECHR-case-law-anchored confidence for rights judgments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments">Methodology Improvement 2 — <strong>ECHR-case-law-anchored confidence for rights judgments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments"></a></h4>
 <p>Today I asserted (KJ-5) that HD03252 has a ~55–70% probability of ECHR challenge within 18 months. This confidence rests on subject-matter intuition rather than a structured case-law taxonomy.</p>
 <p><strong>Action for next run</strong>: Build a reference table of recent ECtHR Article 3/8 cases on detainee conditions (win/loss rates, timelines, facts) and anchor future rights-litigation probabilities to the empirical base rate.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database">Methodology Improvement 3 — <strong>Pre-election-sprint comparator database</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database">Methodology Improvement 3 — <strong>Pre-election-sprint comparator database</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database"></a></h4>
 <p>Today I used Nordic + EU comparators (Denmark 2019, Germany 2024, etc.) qualitatively. For recurrent Tier-C evening analyses during the pre-election window, a structured comparator database with normalized features (seats-swing, pre-election bill volume, coalition-party count) would elevate the comparative-international artifact from descriptive to explanatory.</p>
 <p><strong>Action for next run</strong>: Build <code>analysis/references/pre-election-sprint-comparators.md</code> with 8–12 normalized cases from 2015–2024.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis">Limitations of today's analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis">Limitations of today's analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Single-day snapshot</strong> — today's high-DIW reading could be smoothed against a 30-day moving average.</li>
 <li><strong>No primary survey data</strong> — polling inferences rely on secondary market commentary.</li>
@@ -4595,7 +4576,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis">Limitations of today's analysis<a cla
 <li><strong>Sibling-folder dependence</strong> — this evening analysis inherits framing from morning analyses; independent re-derivation was partial.</li>
 <li><strong>IMF/SCB data not directly queried this cycle</strong> — carried forward from monthly-review.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration">Process audit — time and iteration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration">Process audit — time and iteration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Wall-clock budget</strong>: 60 minutes end-to-end (Timer A) | 28 minutes to PR call (Timer B)</li>
 <li><strong>Pass 1 time</strong>: Approximately 20–25 minutes to produce 23 artifacts</li>
@@ -4603,7 +4584,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration">Process audit — time and iterati
 <li><strong>AI-FIRST compliance</strong>: Minimum 2 iterations met; all claims reviewed against alternatives</li>
 <li><strong>Shortcut discipline</strong>: All 23 artifacts produced with substantive content; no boilerplate</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis">Next-cycle handoff package (for tomorrow's morning analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis">Next-cycle handoff package (for tomorrow's morning analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>PIR-1–PIR-7 explicit in intelligence-assessment.md</li>
 <li>Standing PIRs A/B/C carried forward</li>
@@ -4611,14 +4592,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis">Next-cycle
 <li>Methodology Improvements 1–3 flagged for implementation</li>
 <li>Carried-forward Scenario monitoring plan</li>
 </ol>
-<p><em>Source: self-audit against <code>analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Self-Audit Checklist</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: <code>news-evening-analysis</code> · <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24906725202 · <strong>UTC</strong>: 2026-04-24T19:00:52Z
 <strong>Requested date</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Effective date</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Window</strong>: today + 7-day lookback for sibling integration</p>
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Classification</strong>: OPEN · Public sources only (GDPR Art. 9(2)(e,g))
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) — primary Riksdag open-data via MCP <code>get_sync_status</code> returned <code>status: live</code> at 19:00:52Z</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-health-at-start">MCP health at start<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health-at-start"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-health-at-start">MCP health at start<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health-at-start"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4655,9 +4635,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-health-at-start">MCP health at start<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Server</th><th>Status</th><th>Latency</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdag-regering</td><td>live</td><td>&#x3C; 1s</td><td><code>get_sync_status</code> returned <code>{status:"live"}</code></td></tr><tr><td>scb</td><td>available</td><td>—</td><td>Not queried today (Tier-C ingests sibling economic context)</td></tr><tr><td>world-bank</td><td>available</td><td>—</td><td>Non-economic residue only (WGI), not required today</td></tr><tr><td>github</td><td>available</td><td>—</td><td>Used for artifact staging</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model">Primary data sources (Tier-C ingestion model)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model">Primary data sources (Tier-C ingestion model)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model"></a></h3>
 <p>This is a <strong>Tier-C aggregation workflow</strong> — the primary data inputs are the four sibling per-type analyses already produced for 2026-04-24. Per <code>ext/tier-c-aggregation.md §Cross-type synthesis</code>, the evening-analysis reads sibling folders and cites them. No fresh per-<code>dok_id</code> downloads are required at this stage; all <code>dok_id</code> provenance is already resolved in the sibling manifests.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sibling-folders-read-today">Sibling folders read (today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders-read-today"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sibling-folders-read-today">Sibling folders read (today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders-read-today"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4689,9 +4669,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-sibling-folders-read-today">Sibling folders read (today)<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling folder</th><th>Path</th><th>Lead documents ingested</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>propositions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/</code></td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104 (4 government bills)</td></tr><tr><td>motions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/</code></td><td>20 opposition motions filed 2026-04-15 → 2026-04-17 against 9 props</td></tr><tr><td>committeeReports</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/</code></td><td>HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29</td></tr><tr><td>interpellations</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/</code></td><td>HD10447 (lead) + HD10428–HD10446 (15 additional)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd">Reference Analyses (sibling synthesis ingestion per ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd">Reference Analyses (sibling synthesis ingestion per ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd"></a></h4>
 <p>Every sibling <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>, and <code>executive-brief.md</code> was read and incorporated into this evening-analysis. Unique <code>dok_id</code> references extracted: <strong>44</strong> (4 propositions + 20 motions + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations − overlap). Open PIRs carried forward: see <code>intelligence-assessment.md §Prior-cycle PIR ingestion</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings">Per-document table (consolidated across siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings">Per-document table (consolidated across siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4879,15 +4859,15 @@ <h3 id="rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings">Per-document table (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Party/Actor</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Full-text status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Restricted detainee benefits (säkerhetsförvaring)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>JuU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Strömmer M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>EU Banking Package (CRR3/CRD6)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>FiU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Wykman M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Tachograph enforcement</td><td>Proposition</td><td>TU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Carlson KD)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>5-year debt-management evaluation</td><td>Skrivelse</td><td>FiU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Wykman M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S drivmedel counter-motion (prop 236)</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td>S (Andersson M.)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>V krigsmateriel amendments</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td>V</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>V drivmedel counter-motion</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td>V</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>MP export ban krigsmateriel</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td>MP</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>MP drivmedel counter-motion</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td>MP</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>C utvisning systematik-krav</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td>C</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>V utvisning full avslag</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td>V</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>MP utvisning motion</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td>MP</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Prison capacity expansion</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>Reg. (Kriminalvården)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU23</td><td>Migration bifurcation (study/research)</td><td>Bet</td><td>SfU</td><td>Reg. (Forssmed KD)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU23</td><td>Riksbank annual review</td><td>Bet</td><td>FiU</td><td>Riksbanken</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01AU15</td><td>ILO ratification</td><td>Bet</td><td>AU</td><td>Reg. (Forssell M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU29</td><td>EV charging infrastructure</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>Reg. (Carlson KD)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD10447</td><td>S sick-pay reimbursement (SME)</td><td>Ip</td><td>NU</td><td>S (Lundqvist P.)</td><td>A2</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD10428–HD10446</td><td>Interpellation batch (S × 12, SD × 2, C × 1, Indep × 1)</td><td>Ip</td><td>Various</td><td>Opposition</td><td>A2</td><td>Metadata + full text</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Full per-document detail lives in each sibling folder's <code>documents/</code> subdirectory. This evening-analysis references but does <strong>not duplicate</strong> those files (see <code>cross-reference-map.md §Sibling folders</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>riksdag-regering</code>: healthy throughout the run. No retries required.</li>
 <li><code>scb</code>: not queried (economic context carried forward from sibling analyses and IMF cache).</li>
 <li><code>world-bank</code>: not queried (non-economic residue not required for today's themes).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retrieval-timestamps">Retrieval timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retrieval-timestamps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retrieval-timestamps">Retrieval timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retrieval-timestamps"></a></h3>
 <p>All sibling folders last written 2026-04-24 between 06:00Z (propositions) and 18:30Z (interpellations) per <code>git log</code> on each folder. This evening-analysis folder created 2026-04-24T19:01Z.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-hash">Provenance hash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-hash"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-hash">Provenance hash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-hash"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: Swedish Riksdag open data (data.riksdagen.se) — A1</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary</strong>: Regeringen pressroom / regeringen.se — A1–A2</li>
@@ -4895,6 +4875,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-provenance-hash">Provenance hash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <li><strong>Tradecraft</strong>: ICD 203, Admiralty 6×6, SATs (ACH, Red Team, Key Assumptions Check) applied per <code>analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code></li>
 </ul>
 <p>— End of manifest —</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -4944,7 +4955,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:11.481Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:33.033Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html b/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html
index 86c7cb0b2d..eec80356a7 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.708Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.276Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.708Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.276Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill","description":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill pre-election delivery package (EU Banking Package HD03253, detainee benefit restriction HD03252, tachograph enforcement HD03256,…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:11.708Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill","description":"On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a four-bill pre-election delivery package (EU Banking Package HD03253, detainee benefit restriction HD03252, tachograph enforcement HD03256,…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:33.276Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-evening-analysis-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>On 2026-04-24 the Kristersson government tabled a <strong>four-bill pre-election delivery package</strong> (EU Banking Package HD03253, detainee benefit restriction HD03252, tachograph enforcement HD03256, debt-management review HD03104) while the Riksdag received <strong>five committee reports</strong> (CU25 prison capacity, SfU23 migration bifurcation, FiU23 Riksbank review, AU15 ILO, CU29 EV charging) and fielded <strong>16 opposition interpellations</strong> (12 filed by S). In the preceding 72 hours the opposition filed <strong>20 counter-motions</strong> against 9 propositions, with SD filing <strong>zero</strong>. The integrated picture is of a coalition executing a <strong>tightly synchronised pre-election legacy sprint</strong> with SD maintaining full Tidö discipline, while S concentrates attacks on economic wedges (drivmedel, SME sick-pay) and V/MP hold the civil-liberty and foreign-policy flanks. Admiralty <strong>A1</strong> on document identity and filings; <strong>B2</strong> on strategic interpretation. <strong>ICD 203 compliant</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial lead selection</strong> — evening story leads with the <em>pre-election legacy sprint</em> frame (KJ-1), not with any single dok_id, because the cross-type pattern is the story.</li>
 <li><strong>Forward-watch prioritisation</strong> — FiU calendar for HD03253/HD01FiU23 and JuU calendar for HD03252 are the next 14-day pressure points (IT-1…IT-3, see <code>forward-indicators.md</code>).</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition stability signal</strong> — SD's zero motions against 9 props confirms the Tidö bloc is structurally intact through summer recess; L's absence from lead ministry roles persists (see <code>coalition-mathematics.md §Intra-coalition load</code>).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Volume</strong>: 4 props + 5 betänkanden + 20 motions + 16 interpellations = <strong>45 active Riksdag documents</strong> in the 24-April cycle window.</li>
 <li><strong>Lead story</strong>: Pre-election legacy sprint — Kristersson government converting Tidö agenda into visible enforcement ahead of September 2026.</li>
@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ <h2 id="rm--60-second-read">⏱ 60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tab
 <li><strong>V/MP signal</strong>: Own civil-liberty (HD024091, HD024096) and foreign-policy (MP krigsmateriel ban) cleavages — creates narrow but durable left-bloc wedge.</li>
 <li><strong>C signal</strong>: Motions on 5 bills with <em>procedural tightening</em> framing — positioning for bourgeois-curious voters.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger-72-h">🔮 Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h">🔮 Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>FT-1 · 2026-04-27 (FiU committee calendar)</strong>: First FiU hearing on HD03253 EU Banking Package will reveal committee timetable for summer-recess enactment. A delay beyond May would signal EU transposition risk (→ scenario S3 in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--key-decisions-matrix">📊 Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--key-decisions-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">📊 Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decisions-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -272,21 +272,21 @@ <h2 id="rm--key-decisions-matrix">📊 Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Owner</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Deadline</th><th>Downstream</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lead HD03253 story framing</td><td>Editorial</td><td>FiU hearing published</td><td>2026-04-27</td><td>Lede + 72h forward watch</td></tr><tr><td>Prep HD03252 civil-liberty angle</td><td>Editorial</td><td>ECtHR precedent research</td><td>2026-05-01</td><td>Wedge story + ECHR context</td></tr><tr><td>Forward-watch HD03252 enactment</td><td>Editorial</td><td>Riksdag vote ≥ 1 Aug 2026</td><td>2026-08-01</td><td>Fact-based follow-up</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Tier 1 (systemic)</strong>: HD03253 transposition delay → EU infringement exposure; HD01FiU23 Riksbank independence debate.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier 2 (political)</strong>: HD03252 ECHR/ECtHR rights challenge; drivmedel climate framing by S/V/MP.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier 3 (operational)</strong>: HD03256 enforcement capacity; HD01CU25 prison-capacity slip ≥ 10% would invert coalition crime narrative.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence base</strong>: 19 primary-source Riksdag documents + cross-type patterns from 4 sibling folders. Single-source dependency mitigated by cross-validation with <code>sibling executive-brief.md</code>s and stakeholder role-verification. See <code>methodology-reflection.md §ICD 203 compliance audit</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--confidence--assumptions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--assumptions">🧠 Confidence &#x26; assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--assumptions"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH (A1)</strong>: Document identity, filings, party attribution, committee routing.</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM (B2)</strong>: Pre-election-sprint narrative framing (strategic interpretation).</li>
 <li><strong>LOW (C3)</strong>: Specific RWA impact magnitudes on Handelsbanken/SEB (QIS not yet published).</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Key assumption (flagged for next-cycle check per <code>methodology-reflection.md</code>)</strong>: That the Tidö coalition's summer-recess timetable holds — if a coalition crisis emerges (e.g. L–KD on HD03252 proportionality), the sprint collapses into autumn, reshaping the election framing.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--companion-files"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-companion-files"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md">synthesis-summary.md</a> — integrated picture</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md">intelligence-assessment.md</a> — Key Judgments + PIRs (ICD-203)</li>
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ <h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a> — run-audit + ICD 203 compliance</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The Kristersson government on 2026-04-24 simultaneously advanced a <strong>four-bill legislative package</strong> (detainee benefits, EU banking, tachograph enforcement, debt review), received <strong>five committee reports</strong> clustering its Tidö pre-election signals (prisons, migration, Riksbank, ILO, EV), and fielded <strong>16 opposition interpellations</strong> — while SD filed <strong>zero counter-motions</strong> against any of the 9 open government bills. This is the profile of a coalition entering <strong>pre-election delivery mode</strong> roughly 16 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election, with the SD party-of-confidence remaining structurally disciplined and S concentrating opposition firepower on economic wedges rather than identity politics.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (cross-type, top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (cross-type, top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -409,8 +409,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-cross-type-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (cross-t
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>DIW</th><th>Theme</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Source folder</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03253</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.80</td><td>EU Banking Package (CRR3/CRD6) — systemic-fiscal</td><td>B2</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.80</td><td>Detainee benefit restriction — civil-liberty / ECtHR</td><td>A2</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10447</td><td>Ip</td><td>3.85</td><td>SME sick-pay reimbursement — S economic wedge</td><td>A2</td><td>interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.50</td><td>Prison capacity expansion — delivery-risk</td><td>A1</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Motion</td><td>3.45</td><td>S drivmedel counter-motion (prop 236) — climate wedge</td><td>A1</td><td>motions</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01SfU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.40</td><td>Migration bifurcation (study/research) — coalition-tension</td><td>B2</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01FiU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.40</td><td>Riksbank annual review — monetary institutional</td><td>A2</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03256</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.20</td><td>Tachograph enforcement — transport-industry</td><td>A1</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024096</td><td>Motion</td><td>3.00</td><td>MP krigsmateriel export ban — foreign-policy wedge</td><td>A1</td><td>motions</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03104</td><td>Skr</td><td>2.80</td><td>5-year debt-management evaluation — fiscal credibility</td><td>A1</td><td>propositions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Ranking robust under ±1 DIW tier perturbation. HD03253 and HD03252 remain co-leaders under any sensible re-weighting because both carry systemic-grade exposure (one fiscal, one rights-based).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence">Thematic convergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-thematic-convergence">Thematic convergence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence"></a></h4>
 <p>Today's 45 active documents cluster into <strong>four coherent narrative threads</strong> that together describe the Tidö coalition's final pre-election positioning:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Coercive-authority expansion</strong> — HD03252 (detainee benefits), HD03256 (tachograph enforcement), HD01CU25 (prison capacity). All three raise the <strong>visible-enforcement</strong> profile ahead of September 2026. Effective dates are front-loaded: HD03256 (1 Jul 2026), HD03252 (1 Aug 2026), HD01CU25 capacity milestones (Q2–Q3 2026).</li>
@@ -418,13 +418,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence">Thematic convergence<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>Migration and labour</strong> — HD01SfU23 (study/research permit bifurcation), HD01AU15 (ILO ratification). The coalition is threading a needle — tightening on irregular migration while loosening on highly-skilled arrivals. Bifurcation is a concession to M's business-vote flank over SD's closed-border preference.</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition counter-choreography</strong> — 20 motions concentrated on drivmedel (FiU), utvisning (SfU), and krigsmateriel (UU); 16 interpellations 75% S-filed. The opposition is running a <em>three-party division-of-labour</em> — S holds the economic centre, V holds the rights-flank, MP holds foreign policy — with C on procedural tightening only.</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Prop → Motion → Committee → Interpellation pipeline</strong> is unusually complete today: HD03252 (prop) will generate JuU counter-motion(s) by 8 May, then the JuU betänkande, then interpellation debate. The full legislative arc is visible.</li>
 <li><strong>SD silence</strong> is the single most structurally revealing signal. Zero motions against 9 props means SD will vote the Tidö line on all current bills — closing the right-flank escape route for opposition messaging.</li>
 <li><strong>S economic-wedge concentration</strong> (drivmedel + sick-pay + Riksbank critique) signals S has decided the 2026 campaign will be fought on <em>cost of living and SME resilience</em> rather than migration or identity.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture">Mermaid — cross-type narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture">Mermaid — cross-type narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   subgraph Gov["Kristersson government (M-KD-L + SD CPA)"]
     direction TB
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--cross-type-narrative-architecture">Mermaid — cross-type na
   classDef consensus fill:#8ac926,stroke:#8ac926,color:#0a0e27
   classDef opp fill:#6a4c93,stroke:#6a4c93,color:#fff
   classDef outcome fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EN headline (72 chars)</strong>: "Tidö's pre-election sprint: banks, prisons, detainees, and SD silence"</li>
 <li><strong>SV headline (74 chars)</strong>: "Tidöregeringens valspurt: banker, fängelser, häkten — och SD:s tystnad"</li>
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a cl
 <li><strong>SV meta description (158 chars)</strong>: "Regeringen driver fyra propositioner och fem betänkanden; oppositionen lämnar 20 motioner på 72 timmar — SD noll. Kvällsanalys av valspurtens politiska arkitektur."</li>
 <li><strong>Primary keywords</strong>: Tidöavtalet, Riksdagen 2026, EU bankpaket CRR3, säkerhetsförvaring, drivmedelsskatt, Patrik Lundqvist, Ulf Kristersson, Niklas Wykman, Gunnar Strömmer, SD-disciplin, valet 2026.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH (A1)</strong>: Document identity, authors, effective dates, filings, committee routing, SD zero-count.</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM (B2)</strong>: Pre-election-sprint narrative (SAT used: <strong>Key Assumptions Check</strong> + <strong>Red-Team challenge</strong> in <code>devils-advocate.md</code>).</li>
@@ -477,42 +477,41 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" ari
 <li>PIR-2: Will any L minister publicly dissent on HD03252 proportionality before 2026-05-31?</li>
 <li>PIR-3: Will S escalate HD10447 to a motion/budget amendment after Busch's 2026-05-07 answer?</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-tradecraft-summary">Tradecraft summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tradecraft-summary">Tradecraft summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tradecraft-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>ICD 203</strong> applied: sources characterised, confidence labelled, alternative hypotheses entertained (<code>devils-advocate.md</code>), key assumptions identified (<code>methodology-reflection.md</code>).</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty 6×6</strong>: every evidence row annotated; source diversity ≥ 3 for P0/P1 claims (cross-validated across sibling folders).</li>
 <li><strong>SATs invoked</strong>: ACH (in <code>devils-advocate.md</code>), Red-Team (scenario S4 in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>), Key Assumptions Check, Outside-In (<code>comparative-international.md</code>).</li>
 <li><strong>Neutrality arithmetic</strong>: Each of the 8 parties is named and treated by observable action — Regeringspartier (M, KD, L) as bill-drivers, SD by its zero motions, S/V/MP/C by their filed motions and interpellations.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions|motions|committeeReports|interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</code> + <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> + <code>executive-brief.md</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Classification</strong>: Public OSINT · <strong>ICD 203 compliant</strong>
 <strong>Confidence framework</strong>: VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / VERY LOW (5-level Admiralty-aligned)
 <strong>Tradecraft</strong>: ICD 203 Standards 1–9; Kent Scale (WEP); SATs (ACH, Red Team, Key Assumptions Check)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic">KJ-1 — Pre-election legacy sprint is the dominant organizing logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic">KJ-1 — Pre-election legacy sprint is the dominant organizing logic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--pre-election-legacy-sprint-is-the-dominant-organizing-logic"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH (B2)</strong></p>
 <p>The simultaneous tabling of four propositions (HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104), landing of five committee reports (HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29), and absorption of 16 opposition interpellations on a single reporting day is <strong>highly likely</strong> a coordinated pre-election positioning sprint rather than a coincidence of the Riksdag calendar. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) all four propositions signed personally by PM Kristersson; (b) hard effective dates front-loaded into summer 2026 (1 Jul — HD03256; 1 Aug — HD03252); (c) Finance Minister Wykman leads two of four bills, concentrating fiscal-credibility messaging; (d) Tidöavtalet framing explicitly present in committee-report clustering (CU25 prisons + SfU23 migration). <strong>Alternative considered</strong> (<code>devils-advocate.md</code> H1): random calendar clustering — rejected because the effective-date alignment to September 2026 election cycle is too structurally precise for chance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact">KJ-2 — SD party-of-confidence discipline is structurally intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact">KJ-2 — SD party-of-confidence discipline is structurally intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--sd-party-of-confidence-discipline-is-structurally-intact"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: VERY HIGH (A1)</strong></p>
 <p>SD filed <strong>zero</strong> counter-motions against any of the nine active government propositions in the 72-hour filing window (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17). This is <strong>highly likely</strong> (Kent Scale: ≥ 85%) a signal that SD will vote the Tidö line on all current bills through summer recess. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) primary-source count from riksdagen.se motion index — A1; (b) consistent with SD's pattern since Tidöavtalet (2022): fewer than 5 counter-motions against government bills across the 2022–2026 mandate; (c) no public SD parliamentary-group dissent recorded in the past 30 days. <strong>Forward linkage</strong>: PIR-4 monitors SD on HD03252 proportionality debate in JuU — a late dissent would force immediate KJ revision.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign">KJ-3 — S has decided the 2026 campaign is an economic campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign">KJ-3 — S has decided the 2026 campaign is an economic campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--s-has-decided-the-2026-campaign-is-an-economic-campaign"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH (B2)</strong></p>
 <p>Filing 12 of 16 interpellations (75%) in the HD10428–HD10447 window and leading the drivmedel counter-motion (HD024082) while <strong>not</strong> filing on krigsmateriel (MP-only, HD024096) is <strong>likely</strong> (Kent Scale: 55–70%) evidence that S's pre-election war-planning has pivoted away from migration/identity politics toward <strong>cost of living, SME resilience, and fiscal critique</strong>. <strong>Indicators</strong>: HD10447 lead dok explicitly reopens the 2024 sick-pay reimbursement decision; S motions cluster in FiU (fiscal) rather than JuU (justice). <strong>Alternative considered</strong>: S is splitting the issue-space with V/MP (division of labour rather than genuine pivot) — partially true but not mutually exclusive with the primary judgment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk">KJ-4 — HD03253 (EU Banking) carries the highest latent transposition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk">KJ-4 — HD03253 (EU Banking) carries the highest latent transposition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--hd03253-eu-banking-carries-the-highest-latent-transposition-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Possible</strong> (Kent Scale: 30–45%) that Sweden misses the CRR3/CRD6 transposition deadline if FiU does not schedule first hearing by 2026-05-15 (PIR-1). <strong>Indicators</strong>: EU deadline pressure; Swedish big-4 bank RWA concerns slow political process; QIS studies not yet published by Finansinspektionen. Mitigating factors: Wykman is a technocratic finance minister with EU-law experience; FiU's 2026 agenda has bandwidth after summer recess. <strong>See</strong> <code>scenario-analysis.md §Scenario S3</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk">KJ-5 — HD03252 (detainee benefits) carries the highest rights-litigation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk">KJ-5 — HD03252 (detainee benefits) carries the highest rights-litigation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--hd03252-detainee-benefits-carries-the-highest-rights-litigation-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Likely</strong> (Kent Scale: 55–70%) that HD03252 will face an ECHR Article 3 / Article 8 challenge within 18 months of entry into force (1 Aug 2026). <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) ECtHR case law on detainee conditions (e.g. <em>Khlaifia v. Italy</em>, <em>Muršić v. Croatia</em>) establishes a low threshold for collective rights restrictions; (b) V filed HD024095 seeking full avslag on a related utvisning bill — signalling a ready legal-advocacy ecosystem; (c) absence of a formal Justitieombudsmannen pre-assessment. <strong>Not alternative to KJ-1</strong>: an ECtHR challenge would not necessarily derail the bill's enactment; it would reshape the 2027+ political framing.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate">KJ-6 — L (Liberals) has structurally exited the lead ministry pool for the remainder of the mandate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate">KJ-6 — L (Liberals) has structurally exited the lead ministry pool for the remainder of the mandate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-6--l-liberals-has-structurally-exited-the-lead-ministry-pool-for-the-remainder-of-the-mandate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: HIGH (B2)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Likely</strong> (Kent Scale: 55–70%) that L will not regain a lead ministerial role on any new Tidö bill before September 2026. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) today's 4-bill batch has zero L-lead ministers; (b) L has held fewer lead roles each quarter since the 2024–25 coalition strain over criminal-justice proportionality; (c) L's internal polling pressure on civil liberty flank (including HD03252). <strong>Implication</strong>: L will seek differentiation via constitutional-committee work rather than ministerial delivery — shifts where pre-election dissent will appear.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy">KJ-7 — The Riksbank independence debate has re-emerged as a sleeper controversy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy">KJ-7 — The Riksbank independence debate has re-emerged as a sleeper controversy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-7--the-riksbank-independence-debate-has-re-emerged-as-a-sleeper-controversy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Confidence: MEDIUM (C3)</strong></p>
 <p><strong>Possible</strong> (Kent Scale: 30–45%) that HD01FiU23 (Riksbank annual review) will escalate into a public debate on Riksbank independence after 2024–25 balance-sheet losses. <strong>Indicators</strong>: (a) the 2022 Sveriges Riksbank Act overhaul is still within its first-five-years review window; (b) SD has previously expressed interest in political oversight of Riksbank; (c) FiU23 is a standing annual review but the 2026 iteration has unusually thick pre-reading bandwidth. This is the most latent, but highest-optionality, institutional risk in the set.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -550,7 +549,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Confidence</th><th>Count</th><th>KJ IDs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>VERY HIGH (A1)</td><td>1</td><td>KJ-2</td></tr><tr><td>HIGH (B2)</td><td>3</td><td>KJ-1, KJ-3, KJ-6</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM (C3)</td><td>3</td><td>KJ-4, KJ-5, KJ-7</td></tr><tr><td>LOW</td><td>0</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>VERY LOW</td><td>0</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Source diversity check</strong> (ICD 203 Standard 2): every KJ cites ≥ 2 independent sources (sibling folder corroboration + primary Riksdag document). Single-source dependencies flagged in individual KJs are candidates for next-cycle PIR follow-up.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pirs-for-next-cycle">PIRs for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pirs-for-next-cycle">PIRs for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -619,7 +618,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pirs-for-next-cycle">PIRs for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li><strong>Standing PIR-B</strong>: Election-cycle wedge escalations (any party escalating beyond normal parliamentary tools)</li>
 <li><strong>Standing PIR-C</strong>: ECHR / ECtHR filings against Swedish law</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-cycle PIR ingestion (Tier-C requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-cycle PIR ingestion (Tier-C requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement"></a></h3>
 <p>Carried forward from sibling folders' intelligence-assessments (2026-04-24 morning runs):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Open PIR from propositions (prior cycle)</strong>: Will Wykman publish CRR3 QIS before 2026-05-15? → rolled into <strong>PIR-1</strong> above.</li>
@@ -629,7 +628,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pir-ingestion-tier-c-requirement">Prior-cycle PIR ingesti
 <li><strong>Previous PIR (from 2026-04-23 monthly-review)</strong>: Budget-recess legislative queue health → <strong>resolved</strong> (today's 4-bill batch indicates healthy queue).</li>
 </ul>
 <p>All inherited PIRs have been incorporated; no orphan PIRs from the 7-day lookback window remain unaddressed.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3">Key Assumptions Check (ICD 203 Standard 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3">Key Assumptions Check (ICD 203 Standard 3)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -672,7 +671,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check-icd-203-standard-3">Key Assumptions Check (ICD
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Assumption</th><th>Evidence strength</th><th>Fragility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Tidö coalition holds through summer recess</td><td>HIGH — SD zero motions + no public ministerial dissent</td><td>MEDIUM — L could break on HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>September 2026 election date is firm</td><td>VERY HIGH — constitutional</td><td>VERY LOW — requires mandate interruption</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Sibling folder analyses are accurate</td><td>HIGH — primary-source-based, cross-validated</td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Opposition inter-party coordination is real (S+V+MP on drivmedel)</td><td>MEDIUM — three motions filed within 72h window</td><td>MEDIUM — may be independent convergence</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Kriminalvården can scale capacity per plan</td><td>LOW — history of capacity slippage</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2">Source characterisation (ICD 203 Standard 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2">Source characterisation (ICD 203 Standard 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary (A1)</strong>: Riksdag open data (data.riksdagen.se) — definitive for document identity and filings</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary (A1–A2)</strong>: Regeringen pressroom (regeringen.se) — definitive for ministerial signings</li>
@@ -680,7 +679,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-source-characterisation-icd-203-standard-2">Source characterisation (
 <li><strong>Quaternary (C3)</strong>: Market/legal analysis (RWA impact, ECtHR probability) — moderate-reliability inference</li>
 </ul>
 <p>No single-source-of-concern dependency (ICD 203 Standard 4 satisfied).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-standards-checklist">ICD 203 Standards checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-standards-checklist"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-standards-checklist">ICD 203 Standards checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-standards-checklist"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -737,12 +736,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-standards-checklist">ICD 203 Standards checklist<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Standard</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Objective</td><td>✅ No partisan framing; party-neutrality arithmetic in <code>methodology-reflection.md</code></td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Independent of political considerations</td><td>✅ Judgments cite observable actions, not preferences</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Timely</td><td>✅ All judgments tied to dated triggers (PIR deadlines)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>All available sources</td><td>✅ 4 sibling folders + MCP live check + cached IMF/SCB context</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Implements analytic tradecraft standards</td><td>✅ Admiralty, WEP, SATs explicitly invoked</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Properly describes quality and credibility</td><td>✅ Admiralty code on every claim</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Properly expresses uncertainty</td><td>✅ Kent Scale + VERY HIGH/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/VERY LOW</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Distinguishes assumptions from judgments</td><td>✅ Key Assumptions Check table above</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Incorporates alternative analysis</td><td>✅ <code>devils-advocate.md</code> with 3 competing hypotheses</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling intelligence-assessments; ICD 203 framework per <code>analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Framework</strong>: DIW (Decision-Information-Worth) weighting per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 4</code>
 <strong>Scale</strong>: 1.0 (Surface / L1) → 4.0 (Intelligence-grade / L3). Weights combine salience × novelty × downstream-dependency × uncertainty-reduction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type">DIW scores per document (top 20, cross-type)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type">DIW scores per document (top 20, cross-type)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1022,7 +1020,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-scores-per-document-top-20-cross-type">DIW scores per document (t
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>DIW</th><th>Salience</th><th>Novelty</th><th>Dependency</th><th>Unc-reduction</th><th>Tier</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03253</td><td>Prop</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>3.80</strong></td><td>4.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>L3</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Prop</td><td>JuU</td><td><strong>3.80</strong></td><td>4.0</td><td>3.8</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.6</td><td>L3</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD10447</td><td>Ip</td><td>NU</td><td><strong>3.85</strong></td><td>3.5</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>L3</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td><strong>3.50</strong></td><td>3.8</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.8</td><td>3.2</td><td>L2+</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD024082</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>3.45</strong></td><td>3.8</td><td>3.2</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2+</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD01SfU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>3.40</strong></td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2+</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD01FiU23</td><td>Bet</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>3.40</strong></td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>L2+</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03256</td><td>Prop</td><td>TU</td><td><strong>3.20</strong></td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD024096</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td><strong>3.00</strong></td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03104</td><td>Skr</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>2.80</strong></td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD024092</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>2.80</strong></td><td>3.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD024098</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td><strong>2.80</strong></td><td>3.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD01AU15</td><td>Bet</td><td>AU</td><td><strong>2.70</strong></td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD024095</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>2.60</strong></td><td>2.8</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD024090</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>2.60</strong></td><td>2.8</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>HD024097</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td><strong>2.60</strong></td><td>2.8</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>HD024091</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td><strong>2.50</strong></td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.5</td><td>L2</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>HD01CU29</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td><strong>2.40</strong></td><td>2.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.8</td><td>L1</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>HD10446</td><td>Ip</td><td>—</td><td><strong>2.20</strong></td><td>2.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>L1</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>HD10445</td><td>Ip</td><td>—</td><td><strong>2.20</strong></td><td>2.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>L1</td><td>A2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid — significance rank diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid — significance rank diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
   subgraph L3["L3 · Intelligence-grade (DIW ≥ 3.6)"]
     HD03253["HD03253 EU Banking · 3.80"]:::l3
@@ -1048,7 +1046,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--significance-rank-diagram">Mermaid — significance rank dia
   classDef l2p fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#0a0e27
   classDef l2 fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#0a0e27
   classDef l1 fill:#6a4c93,stroke:#6a4c93,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1076,12 +1074,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Perturbation</th><th>Effect on ranking</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>+1 salience on HD03253</td><td>HD03253 moves to sole #1 (4.05); still L3</td></tr><tr><td>−1 novelty on HD03252</td><td>HD03252 drops to 3.50 (L2+); HD10447 takes sole L3 lead</td></tr><tr><td>+1 uncertainty-reduction on HD01FiU23</td><td>FiU23 enters L2+ top-3 at 3.75</td></tr><tr><td>Treat SD silence as DIW-bearing signal (new entity)</td><td>Adds a "null-event" item at DIW 3.4</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Robustness</strong>: The top-5 DIW ranking (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252, HD01CU25, HD024082) is stable under any ±0.3 perturbation — all lead items remain in the top-5 under sensible re-weighting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency">Rank-ordering logic (ICD 203 Standard 5 — tradecraft transparency)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency">Rank-ordering logic (ICD 203 Standard 5 — tradecraft transparency)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rank-ordering-logic-icd-203-standard-5--tradecraft-transparency"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Salience</strong> — how many stakeholders care today? HD03253 and HD03252 rank top because they generate cross-constituency attention (banks, civil-liberty NGOs, EU institutions, opposition parties).</p>
 <p><strong>Novelty</strong> — what does this add to prior knowledge? HD10447 ranks top because reopening the 2024 sick-pay reimbursement decision is a strategic signal, not a routine filing. HD03253 is partially telegraphed by EU timeline and thus scores lower on novelty than salience.</p>
 <p><strong>Dependency</strong> — how many downstream decisions hinge on this? HD03253 scores highest — committee bandwidth, summer-recess calendar, banking supervision all cascade off it.</p>
 <p><strong>Uncertainty reduction</strong> — does reading this reduce future ambiguity? HD10447 scores top because Minister Busch's response on 2026-05-07 will directly resolve PIR-3.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up">Cluster-level scoring (where individual items roll up)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up">Cluster-level scoring (where individual items roll up)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1118,48 +1116,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-where-individual-items-roll-up">Cluster-level s
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Member dok_ids</th><th>Cluster DIW</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Drivmedel counter-motion cluster</td><td>HD024082 + HD024092 + HD024098</td><td>3.60</td><td>Three-party convergence raises political salience</td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning counter-motion cluster</td><td>HD024090 + HD024095 + HD024097</td><td>2.80</td><td>C/V/MP alignment without S — a narrower bloc</td></tr><tr><td>S interpellation cluster</td><td>HD10428–HD10446 (12 S-filed)</td><td>3.20</td><td>Strategic-pattern weight exceeds any single dok</td></tr><tr><td>Krigsmateriel cluster</td><td>HD024091 + HD024096</td><td>2.90</td><td>V+MP with S silence — structurally narrow</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day">Why today is a high-DIW day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day">Why today is a high-DIW day<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-why-today-is-a-high-diw-day"></a></h3>
 <p>Three factors place today in the <strong>top-5% of reporting-day signal density</strong> for the 2026 mandate period to date:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>Three L3-grade items land simultaneously (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252) — typical days have 0–1.</li>
 <li>Full legislative-arc visibility (prop → motion → bet → ip on the same cycle) is rare.</li>
 <li>SD's zero motions on 9 bills is itself a high-DIW "null-event" signal — the <strong>dog that did not bark</strong> is informative.</li>
 </ol>
-<p><em>Source: sibling folder significance-scoring.md files + cross-type DIW re-weighting per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §DIW Output Matrix</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Analyze how today's legislative batch is likely to be framed across major Swedish media categories and what this implies for narrative contestation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category">Expected framing by outlet category<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing">Public-service (SVT, SR, DN public-facing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category">Expected framing by outlet category<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet-category"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing">Public-service (SVT, SR, DN public-facing)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-public-service-svt-sr-dn-public-facing"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Likely frame</strong>: "Riksdagen behandlade fyra viktiga förslag" — procedurally balanced coverage</li>
 <li><strong>Emphasis</strong>: HD03252 and HD01CU25 will receive prominent coverage as most newsworthy</li>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: Proportionality framing on HD03252 — likely to be cautious/balanced</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet">Major morning papers (Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet">Major morning papers (Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-major-morning-papers-dagens-nyheter-svenska-dagbladet"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DN likely frame</strong>: Rights-centric on HD03252; technocratic on HD03253; business-section on banking</li>
 <li><strong>SvD likely frame</strong>: Economic-competence framing on HD03253; fiscal-credibility framing on HD03104; business section for banking + SME sick-pay</li>
 <li><strong>Divergence</strong>: DN emphasizes rights/governance; SvD emphasizes fiscal/institutional</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen">Tabloids (Aftonbladet, Expressen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen">Tabloids (Aftonbladet, Expressen)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tabloids-aftonbladet-expressen"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Aftonbladet likely frame</strong>: "Regeringen försämrar levnadsvillkor för dömda" — rights framing; SME sick-pay as welfare story</li>
 <li><strong>Expressen likely frame</strong>: "Tidöavtalet levererar" — coalition-delivery framing; cost-of-living framed as opposition weakness</li>
 <li><strong>Divergence</strong>: Sharp — these outlets anchor opposition and coalition narratives respectively</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer">Business press (Affärsvärlden, Veckans Affärer)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer">Business press (Affärsvärlden, Veckans Affärer)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-business-press-affärsvärlden-veckans-affärer"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Frame</strong>: HD03253 + HD01FiU23 take center stage; political framing ignored</li>
 <li><strong>Emphasis</strong>: Bank RWA impact; Riksbank annual review; Swedish financial-supervisory stance</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-partisancampaign-media-various">Partisan/campaign media (various)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-partisancampaign-media-various"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-partisancampaign-media-various">Partisan/campaign media (various)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-partisancampaign-media-various"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S-aligned framing</strong>: Cost-of-living; SME workers; drivmedel as "regressive"</li>
 <li><strong>M/coalition-aligned framing</strong>: Discipline + delivery; EU compliance; capacity expansion</li>
 <li><strong>SD-aligned framing</strong>: Migration + rights-restriction victories; the interpellation storm as opposition weakness signals</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252">Framing contest on HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252">Framing contest on HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252"></a></h3>
 <p>Critical contested story. Expected framings:</p>
 
 
@@ -1196,7 +1193,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03252">Framing contest on HD03252<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>Frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government PR</td><td>"Stramare regler mot dömda" — tightening rules against convicted</td></tr><tr><td>SVT</td><td>"Regeringen stramar åt för häktade" — tightening for detainees</td></tr><tr><td>DN leder</td><td>"Proportionalitetsfråga"</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet</td><td>"Människovärdets gränser"</td></tr><tr><td>Expressen</td><td>"Strikt men rättfärdigt"</td></tr><tr><td>V/MP aligned</td><td>"Människorättsattack"</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Framing-battle prediction</strong>: 5–10 days of contested framing; dominant national frame will be somewhere between "stramare åtgärder" (neutral-government-leaning) and "proportionalitetsfråga" (neutral-rights-leaning). Aftonbladet and Expressen poles rarely capture majority framing in Swedish public discourse.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253">Framing contest on HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253">Framing contest on HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253"></a></h3>
 <p>Less contested. Technocratic dominance likely:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Business press: "CRR3/CRD6 transposition announced" — factual</li>
@@ -1204,7 +1201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd03253">Framing contest on HD03253<a class="" ari
 <li>Tabloids: Minimal coverage (low newsworthiness)</li>
 <li>Political framing risk: SD could frame as "EU overreach" — low probability given SD's pro-coalition position today</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447">Framing contest on HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447">Framing contest on HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447"></a></h3>
 <p>S's most successful lever. Expected framings:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Aftonbladet: "Företag tvingas betala för sjuka anställda" — sympathetic to SME narrative</li>
@@ -1213,7 +1210,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-framing-contest-on-hd10447">Framing contest on HD10447<a class="" ari
 <li>SVT Aktuellt: Likely features if Busch's response is defensive</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Framing-battle prediction</strong>: S will gain narrative ground if Busch's 2026-05-07 response is pure refusal. If Busch offers any compromise or review, framing neutralizes.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-dominance-matrix">Narrative dominance matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-dominance-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-dominance-matrix">Narrative dominance matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-dominance-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1256,9 +1253,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-dominance-matrix">Narrative dominance matrix<a class="" ari
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Narrative</th><th>Coalition-favourable</th><th>Opposition-favourable</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Discipline + delivery" (HD03252/253/256/3104 + SD zero motions)</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>"Cost of living squeeze" (HD10447 + HD024082 cluster)</td><td>LOW</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>"Rights regime erosion" (HD03252 + HD01SfU23)</td><td>LOW</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td>"Institutional competence" (HD03253 + HD01CU25)</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td>LOW</td></tr><tr><td>"Coalition fragility" (L absence signal)</td><td>LOW</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td>"Riksbank under threat" (HD01FiU23 latent)</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW (dormant)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Net media-framing advantage over the next 14 days: <strong>narrowly opposition-favourable</strong> on volume (cost-of-living narrative has Segment F pull); <strong>narrowly coalition-favourable</strong> on institutional credibility.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-to-polling-conversion">Framing-to-polling conversion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-to-polling-conversion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-to-polling-conversion">Framing-to-polling conversion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-to-polling-conversion"></a></h3>
 <p>Historically, a 14-day dominant media frame shifts polling by approximately 0.5–1.5 pp in the favoured party. Today's contested framing batch could produce a <strong>0.5–1.0 pp net shift</strong> toward opposition on cost-of-living, partially offset by <strong>0.3–0.5 pp</strong> coalition shift on institutional credibility. <strong>Net expected shift: 0.0 to +0.5 pp toward opposition</strong> over 14 days.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation">Journalism quality and ICD 203 source-evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation">Journalism quality and ICD 203 source-evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation"></a></h3>
 <p>This analysis is framed-prediction, not primary-observation. Sources:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Content analysis from sibling folder media-framing-analysis files</li>
@@ -1266,12 +1263,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-journalism-quality-and-icd-203-source-evaluation">Journalism quality
 <li>Heuristic reasoning on rights/fiscal/institutional framing dynamics</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Admiralty code for framings above</strong>: B2 (reliable source category, but framed prediction, not observation).</p>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of sibling media-framing artifacts + journalism-coverage-pattern base rates.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder matrix per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 5</code>.
 Lenses: Government · Opposition · Civil society · Industry / market · Administrative / expert · International.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1327,28 +1323,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Key actors today</th><th>Reading of the day</th><th>Prevailing frame</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Government / coalition</strong></td><td>PM Kristersson; Minister Wykman (FiU); Minister Strömmer (JuU); Minister Carlson (SfU); Minister Busch (NU)</td><td>"Tidöavtalet delivery sprint — four legacy bills signed off in a single reporting day; coalition discipline structurally intact with SD zero-motions."</td><td><em>Credibility through throughput</em></td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104 all Kristersson-signed</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Parliamentary opposition (S-V-MP-C)</strong></td><td>S (lead on 12/16 ips + drivmedel); V (filed full-avslag on utvisning); MP (filed krigsmateriel ban); C (filed 3 utvisning counter-motions)</td><td>"Four separate counter-choreographies: S on economy, V on rights-maximalism, MP on ethics, C on flank-of-migration differentiation."</td><td><em>Choose your wedge early</em></td><td>HD024082 (S), HD024095 (V), HD024096 (MP), HD024090/97 (C)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Civil society / NGOs</strong></td><td>Swedish section Amnesty; Civil Rights Defenders; Sveriges Advokatsamfund; Fackförbund TCO/LO</td><td>"HD03252 is the marquee rights concern; HD01SfU23 is the latent structural concern; SME sick-pay is the latent labour-market concern."</td><td><em>Structural rights erosion</em></td><td>ECHR literature; ongoing Advokatsamfundet proportionality campaign</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Industry / market</strong></td><td>Banking four (SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Nordea); SME employer orgs (Företagarna, Svenskt Näringsliv); transport industry (Transportföretagen); motor industry</td><td>"HD03253 is the tail-risk — Swedish banking RWA can change materially. HD10447 is a high-leverage symbolic bargaining chip. Transport industry sees HD03256 as routine."</td><td><em>Regulatory predictability is cheaper than surprise</em></td><td>Banking industry briefings on CRR3; Företagarna's standing sick-pay position</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Administrative / expert</strong></td><td>Kriminalvården (capacity); Migrationsverket (bifurcation); Riksbank (FiU23); Finansinspektionen (CRR3)</td><td>"Three of four top bills land directly on administrative agencies — capacity is the binding constraint, not politics."</td><td><em>Political ambition must match operational capacity</em></td><td>CU25 capacity concerns; SfU23 bifurcation operationalization</td></tr><tr><td><strong>International / EU</strong></td><td>EU Commission (banking + migration); Council of Europe / ECtHR (detainee conditions); Nordic peers (DK/NO/FI parallel tracks)</td><td>"EU prudential file is on the critical path; ECHR watchdogs are priming challenges; Nordic comparators observe Sweden's detainee-rights experiment."</td><td><em>Sweden sets, then sometimes corrects, Nordic norms</em></td><td>CRR3 EU calendar; ECtHR Article 3 case law</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-role-playing-exercises">Role-playing exercises<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-role-playing-exercises"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator">Red team perspective — opposition strategy operator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-role-playing-exercises">Role-playing exercises<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-role-playing-exercises"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator">Red team perspective — opposition strategy operator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--opposition-strategy-operator"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"We've chosen our ground. Drivmedel is our pre-election anchor because it translates trivially to household budgets; HD10447 is our strategic reopening of the 2024 sick-pay fight; and we refuse to engage on krigsmateriel or utvisning because those are ideological traps. Let V/MP/C signal-differentiate on rights; we own the wallet."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading is consistent with S filing the sole drivmedel motion (HD024082) and leading 12/16 interpellations in one window — a <strong>strategic concentration</strong>, not a shotgun approach.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff">Red team perspective — PMO chief of staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff">Red team perspective — PMO chief of staff<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--pmo-chief-of-staff"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"Four bills, two weeks of session left before summer recess, all signed by the PM personally. Message: the government has delivered. SD filed nothing. L is quiet. The interpellation storm is routine opposition theatre — we respond within rules. The one landmine is HD03252: if L blinks in JuU on proportionality, we lose our coalition-discipline narrative. We watch L, not S."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading is consistent with the observed ministerial signing pattern and the lack of any L-lead ministry in today's batch.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel">Red team perspective — Civil Rights Defenders counsel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel">Red team perspective — Civil Rights Defenders counsel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--civil-rights-defenders-counsel"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"HD03252 is a ECHR Article 3 / Article 8 test case waiting to happen. We coordinate with Amnesty SE and Advokatsamfundet. We file an amicus brief before third reading. We prepare litigation readiness for Q4 2026. We do not over-mobilize now — we let V carry the parliamentary fight and we win the courtroom fight."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading predicts a 12–18-month latency between bill enactment (Aug 2026) and the first substantive ECtHR filing (est. 2027–2028).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro">Red team perspective — banking sector CRO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro">Red team perspective — banking sector CRO<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-perspective--banking-sector-cro"></a></h4>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>"CRR3/CRD6 transposition could add 15–35 bps to our RWA. We cannot tolerate a late or overzealous Swedish transposition. We brief FiU, we brief Finansinspektionen, we publish our own QIS. We push for a minimal-transposition, straight-EU-compliance approach. We treat HD03253 as operationally urgent even if politically quiet."</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>This reading explains why HD03253 carries such high DIW despite low public controversy — the markets and regulators treat it as priority-1.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map">Cross-stakeholder tension map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map">Cross-stakeholder tension map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   Gov["Coalition\n(M-KD-L + SD)"] -->|Delivers| HD03252["HD03252"]
   Gov -->|Delivers| HD03253["HD03253"]
@@ -1371,7 +1367,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-tension-map">Cross-stakeholder tension map<a class=
   class OppS,OppV,OppMP,OppC opp
   class CivSoc,Industry civ
   class EU,ECHR intl</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary">Stakeholder pressure weight summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary">Stakeholder pressure weight summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>For each top-5 dok_id, weighted sum of aligned-vs-opposed stakeholders:</p>
 
 
@@ -1421,13 +1417,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-weight-summary">Stakeholder pressure weight summ
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Aligned</th><th>Opposed</th><th>Net</th><th>Interpretation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>Gov + Industry + Admin (FI)</td><td>— (EU neutral)</td><td>+3</td><td>Likely smooth passage</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Gov + SD + Industry (neutral)</td><td>V + MP + CivSoc + C (partial)</td><td>0</td><td>Passage likely but contested</td></tr><tr><td>HD10447</td><td>Industry (SME) + S</td><td>Gov (Busch)</td><td>0</td><td>Symbolic bargaining</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Gov + CivSoc (on standards)</td><td>Admin (capacity concerns)</td><td>+1</td><td>Passage with amendments</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S + V + MP + consumers</td><td>Gov + M-KD-L</td><td>0</td><td>Defeated in plenum but wedge value retained</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<p><em>Source: sibling folder stakeholder-perspectives.md + synthesis of industry-briefing precedent.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Four-horizon dated-indicator system per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 10</code>.
 <strong>Horizons</strong>: T+7 days · T+30 days · T+90 days · T+12 months.
 <strong>Indicator types</strong>: Calendar-anchored · Event-triggered · Threshold-triggered.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01">T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01">T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1466,7 +1461,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t7-days-by-2026-05-01">T+7 days (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidde
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation if YES</th><th>Interpretation if NO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1</td><td>FiU session calendar published</td><td>calendar release</td><td>HD03253 first hearing date</td><td>S1 scenario reinforced</td><td>S3 indicator</td></tr><tr><td>F2</td><td>DN/SvD editorial on HD03252</td><td>editorial publication</td><td>Proportionality framing</td><td>Framing contest live</td><td>Coalition framing dominant</td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>Aftonbladet front-page on SME sick-pay</td><td>front page</td><td>HD10447 narrative amplification</td><td>S wedge traction</td><td>Wedge contained</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24">T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24">T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1521,7 +1516,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t30-days-by-2026-05-24">T+30 days (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation if YES</th><th>Interpretation if NO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F4</td><td>Minister Busch HD10447 response</td><td>2026-05-07 session</td><td>Refusal / compromise / review</td><td>Campaign inflection</td><td>Routine defense</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>JuU first hearing on HD03252</td><td>schedule</td><td>Proportionality motion discussed</td><td>PIR-4 activation</td><td>Routine passage path</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td>L public comment on HD03252</td><td>media appearance</td><td>L position clarity</td><td>Coalition reinforced</td><td>L flank signal</td></tr><tr><td>F7</td><td>Kriminalvården monthly capacity update</td><td>end of May publication</td><td>Capacity trend</td><td>On-track</td><td>PIR-5 pre-flag</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td>FiU schedule HD03253 (PIR-1)</td><td>2026-05-15 deadline</td><td>Scheduling event</td><td>S1 reinforced</td><td>S3 activated</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23">T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23">T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1584,7 +1579,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t90-days-by-2026-07-23">T+90 days (by 2026-07-23)<a class="" aria-hid
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation if YES</th><th>Interpretation if NO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F9</td><td>HD03252 floor vote outcome</td><td>June 2026</td><td>Coalition discipline on amendments</td><td>Sprint narrative succeeds</td><td>Fracture emerges</td></tr><tr><td>F10</td><td>Q2 Kriminalvården capacity report</td><td>2026-06-23</td><td>Bed-count vs plan</td><td>On-plan = S1</td><td>Off-plan = S2</td></tr><tr><td>F11</td><td>Polling shift (YouGov/Novus)</td><td>Quarterly</td><td>+/- 3pp shift bloc-to-bloc</td><td>Scenario discrimination</td><td>Status quo</td></tr><tr><td>F12</td><td>HD03253 first-reading complete</td><td>June/July</td><td>Transposition timeline</td><td>S1 reinforced</td><td>S3 signals</td></tr><tr><td>F13</td><td>ECHR filing signal on HD03252</td><td>post-enactment</td><td>Filing preliminaries</td><td>R2 activated</td><td>Latent remains</td></tr><tr><td>F14</td><td>SD 30-day motion-filing rate</td><td>rolling</td><td>Coalition discipline index</td><td>&#x3C; 2 motions = S1</td><td>> 3 motions = signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24">T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24">T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1640,7 +1635,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-t12-months-by-2027-04-24">T+12 months (by 2027-04-24)<a class="" aria
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Expected signal</th><th>Interpretation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F15</td><td>September 2026 election outcome</td><td>Sep 2026</td><td>Mandatsiffror</td><td>Scenario S1/S2/S3/S4 resolution</td></tr><tr><td>F16</td><td>EU Commission letter on CRR3 transposition</td><td>post-deadline</td><td>Regulatory letter</td><td>R1 confirmed or avoided</td></tr><tr><td>F17</td><td>First ECHR chamber-level filing on HD03252</td><td>Q2-Q3 2027</td><td>Case registration</td><td>R2 activated</td></tr><tr><td>F18</td><td>Kriminalvården annual capacity report</td><td>Q1 2027</td><td>Capacity delivery</td><td>Operational promise-keeping</td></tr><tr><td>F19</td><td>SME sick-pay legislation under new government?</td><td>post-election</td><td>Legislative proposal</td><td>Post-S1 or post-S2 directly</td></tr><tr><td>F20</td><td>Riksbank-independence debate escalation</td><td>ongoing</td><td>Institutional debate</td><td>Black-swan latent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-priority-ranking">Indicator priority ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-priority-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-priority-ranking">Indicator priority ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-priority-ranking"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Tier-1 (decision-forcing, &#x3C; 30 days)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>F4 (Busch response 2026-05-07)</li>
@@ -1659,7 +1654,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-priority-ranking">Indicator priority ranking<a class="" ari
 <li>F15 (election outcome)</li>
 <li>F16-F20 (post-election)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-calendar-placement">Calendar placement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-placement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-calendar-placement">Calendar placement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-calendar-placement"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">gantt
   dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
   title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -1678,7 +1673,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-calendar-placement">Calendar placement<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
   section T+12 months
   Election                 :crit, f15, 2026-09-13, 1d
   ECHR preliminary filing  :f17, 2027-04-01, 90d</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping">Indicator-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping">Indicator-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1725,14 +1720,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-to-pir-mapping">Indicator-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Forward Indicator</th><th>Linked PIR</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F4</td><td>PIR-3</td></tr><tr><td>F5</td><td>PIR-4</td></tr><tr><td>F6</td><td>PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>F7, F10, F18</td><td>PIR-5</td></tr><tr><td>F8</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>F13, F17</td><td>PIR-2 (and emerging)</td></tr><tr><td>F15</td><td>All scenarios</td></tr><tr><td>F16</td><td>PIR-1 final resolution</td></tr><tr><td>F20</td><td>PIR-7</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-null-indicator-watch">Null-indicator watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-null-indicator-watch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-null-indicator-watch">Null-indicator watch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-null-indicator-watch"></a></h3>
 <p>Three <strong>absence</strong> signals to monitor (dog-that-did-not-bark):</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>SD silence on HD03252</strong>: if SD remains silent through JuU, coalition discipline reinforced</li>
 <li><strong>L silence on HD03252</strong>: if L declines public comment for 30 days, coalition internal-management succeeded</li>
 <li><strong>MP silence on drivmedel</strong>: if MP joins drivmedel cluster (currently S-led), opposition consolidation sharpened</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-monitoring-cadence">Monitoring cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-monitoring-cadence">Monitoring cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-monitoring-cadence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Daily</strong>: F1-F3 (T+7 watch)</li>
 <li><strong>Weekly</strong>: F4-F8 + null-indicators</li>
@@ -1740,14 +1735,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-monitoring-cadence">Monitoring cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><strong>Monthly</strong>: F9-F14 comprehensive review</li>
 <li><strong>Quarterly</strong>: F15-F20 strategic review</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of sibling forward-indicators artifacts; calendar-anchoring per published Riksdag session plan.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Three-scenario baseline + branching (ICD 203 Standard 9 — alternative analysis)
 <strong>Horizon</strong>: T+30 days (pre-summer-recess) → T+4 months (early election campaign) → T+12 months (post-election)
 <strong>Baseline date</strong>: 2026-04-24</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 1.00)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050">Scenario S1 — "Sprint succeeds, coalition consolidates" (Prob: 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100">Scenario set (probabilities sum to 1.00)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-set-probabilities-sum-to-100"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050">Scenario S1 — "Sprint succeeds, coalition consolidates" (Prob: 0.50)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: All 4 propositions pass committee by mid-June, floor by end-June. HD03253 transposition schedule holds. HD01CU25 Kriminalvården Q2 report shows on-plan capacity. SD maintains zero-motion discipline through summer. L publicly supports HD03252 after a cosmetic proportionality amendment. S's cost-of-living campaign gains traction in July but coalition responds with a pre-recess communication package. The Tidö coalition enters summer recess with a delivery-legacy narrative largely intact.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1757,7 +1751,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s1--sprint-succeeds-coalition-consolidates-prob-050">Scenari
 <li>YouGov/Novus show no ≥ 3pp shift toward S before 2026-08-31</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: Any of the four signposts fails → downgrade to S2.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035">Scenario S2 — "Wedge works, opposition gains ground" (Prob: 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035">Scenario S2 — "Wedge works, opposition gains ground" (Prob: 0.35)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: S's HD10447 + drivmedel combination gains media traction during May. Minister Busch gives a flat-footed response. Q2 Kriminalvården capacity data disappoints. Polling shifts 3–5pp toward S–V–MP bloc by August. Coalition still holds formally but loses pre-election momentum. HD03252 passes with minor amendment but faces first ECHR filing signal in Q4. HD03253 transposition slips to autumn session.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1767,7 +1761,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s2--wedge-works-opposition-gains-ground-prob-035">Scenario S
 <li>First ECHR preliminary filing signal on HD03252 before 2026-12-31</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: Coalition response to the above blunts wedge → upgrade back to S1 (conditional).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012">Scenario S3 — "Institutional stress — EU deadline slips + L fracture" (Prob: 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012">Scenario S3 — "Institutional stress — EU deadline slips + L fracture" (Prob: 0.12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob-012"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: HD03253 FiU schedule slips past 2026-05-15. Summer recess consumed. Autumn session rushed. L publicly dissents on HD03252 proportionality, forcing a coalition crisis-management episode in JuU. SD silence broken by an unexpected counter-signal on detainee benefits. Opposition unity strengthens. Coalition enters election campaign with fractured L flank, late EU-banking transposition, and one ECHR filing.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1777,7 +1771,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s3--institutional-stress--eu-deadline-slips--l-fracture-prob
 <li>EU Commission sends letter of formal notice on CRR3 transposition</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: L internal resolution on HD03252 → conditional downgrade.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003">Scenario S4 — "Black swan — Riksbank independence flashpoint" (Prob: 0.03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003">Scenario S4 — "Black swan — Riksbank independence flashpoint" (Prob: 0.03)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Storyline</strong>: HD01FiU23 debate takes an unexpected turn with SD or KD raising a political-oversight proposal. Media frames as "government challenges Riksbank". Markets respond with currency volatility. Opposition pivots to constitutional-defender narrative. Coalition dominates the news cycle for the wrong reason. All other bills become secondary.</p>
 <p><strong>Signposts</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1786,7 +1780,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-s4--black-swan--riksbank-independence-flashpoint-prob-003">S
 <li>KU initiates review of Riksbank law</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Falsifiers</strong>: HD01FiU23 passes as routine annual review.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-tree-diagram">Scenario tree diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-tree-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-tree-diagram">Scenario tree diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-tree-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   Start["2026-04-24\nBaseline"] --> Dec1{"FiU schedules\nHD03253 by\n2026-05-15?"}
   Dec1 -- Yes --> Dec2{"L supports\nHD03252 amendment?"}
@@ -1806,7 +1800,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-tree-diagram">Scenario tree diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="
   class S2 s2
   class S3 s3
   class S4 s4</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-probability-rationale">Probability rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-rationale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-probability-rationale">Probability rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-rationale"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1849,7 +1843,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-probability-rationale">Probability rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Prior</th><th>Evidence pull</th><th>Posterior</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>0.40</td><td>+SD discipline intact, +PM-signed bills, −L quiet (neutral-to-positive)</td><td>0.50</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>0.35</td><td>+S concentrated strategy, +drivmedel 3-party convergence</td><td>0.35</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>0.20</td><td>−only L quiet, no public dissent, +EU deadline tight</td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>0.05</td><td>−no current catalyst visible</td><td>0.03</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sum</strong></td><td><strong>1.00</strong></td><td></td><td><strong>1.00</strong> ✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-by-scenario">Implications by scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-by-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-by-scenario">Implications by scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-by-scenario"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1891,17 +1885,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-by-scenario">Implications by scenario<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Implication for coalition</th><th>Implication for opposition</th><th>Implication for markets</th><th>Implication for civil society</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Delivery-legacy</td><td>Regroup for Q4</td><td>Low volatility</td><td>Prep for post-enactment litigation</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Campaign on defense</td><td>Momentum, maintain discipline</td><td>Moderate SEK, equity volatility</td><td>Active press/campaign coordination</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>Crisis management</td><td>Windfall</td><td>High volatility; bank equities weak</td><td>Accelerated ECHR prep</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Worst case; crisis</td><td>Windfall; constitutional frame</td><td>High SEK/bond volatility</td><td>Neutral (institutional, not rights)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan">Cross-scenario monitoring plan<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan">Cross-scenario monitoring plan<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-scenario-monitoring-plan"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Week of 2026-04-28</strong>: FiU agenda publication (HD03253 scheduling) — binary signal for S1 vs S3.
 <strong>Week of 2026-05-05</strong>: Minister Busch response on HD10447 — signal for S1 vs S2.
 <strong>Week of 2026-05-15</strong>: PIR-1 deadline — binary signal.
 <strong>Week of 2026-06-09</strong>: JuU passage of HD03252 — signal on L flank.
 <strong>Week of 2026-06-23</strong>: Kriminalvården Q2 capacity report — S1 stability signal.</p>
-<p><em>Source: cross-scenario synthesis of sibling scenario analyses; Bayesian re-weighting of priors based on today's signals.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 5-dimension risk register (Political × Legal × Operational × Financial × Reputational) with L×I (Likelihood × Impact) scoring on a 1–5 scale.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li">Risk register (ranked by L×I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li">Risk register (ranked by L×I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2068,7 +2061,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register-ranked-by-li">Risk register (ranked by L×I)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Dimensions</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>L×I</th><th>Mitigation / monitor</th><th>Linked dok_ids</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>HD03253 missed EU transposition deadline → EU infraction procedure</td><td>Legal × Reputational</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>PIR-1: monitor FiU calendar</td><td>HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>HD03252 ECHR Article 3/8 challenge → constitutional-level loss</td><td>Legal × Reputational</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>Proportionality amendment before 3rd reading</td><td>HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss ≥ 10%</td><td>Operational × Political</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>PIR-5: Kriminalvården Q2 report</td><td>HD01CU25, HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>L-coalition fracture on HD03252</td><td>Political × Reputational</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>PIR-2: L press monitoring</td><td>HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>Banking sector disorderly CRR3 implementation → market stress</td><td>Financial × Operational</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>FI QIS publication; clear transposition calendar</td><td>HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>S cost-of-living campaign achieves traction → Tidö ballot-box damage</td><td>Political × Reputational</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>12</td><td>Counter-narrative on HD03104 debt skr</td><td>HD10447, HD024082</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Migration bifurcation (HD01SfU23) operational breakdown at Migrationsverket</td><td>Operational × Legal</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Post-Q2 audit</td><td>HD01SfU23</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Riksbank independence debate re-opens</td><td>Political × Financial</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>PIR-7: UU/KU calendar</td><td>HD01FiU23</td></tr><tr><td>R9</td><td>Utvisning counter-motions mobilize cross-party C+V+MP bloc</td><td>Political × Reputational</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>SfU committee management</td><td>HD024090/95/97</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Krigsmateriel ethical wedge pulls S supporters away</td><td>Political</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>Monitor S communications</td><td>HD024096</td></tr><tr><td>R11</td><td>MP ethical gambit dilutes S dominance of opposition frame</td><td>Political (inter-opposition)</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>N/A</td><td>HD024096</td></tr><tr><td>R12</td><td>Tachograph (HD03256) delays affect transport industry</td><td>Operational</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>Committee passage</td><td>HD03256</td></tr><tr><td>R13</td><td>Debt-mgmt skr reframed as fiscal vulnerability</td><td>Financial × Political</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>Technical communication</td><td>HD03104</td></tr><tr><td>R14</td><td>Summer-recess schedule compression — bills rushed</td><td>Operational × Legal</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>Earlier committee scheduling</td><td>HD03253, HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>R15</td><td>Interpellation backlog → administrative fatigue</td><td>Operational</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>Minister response triage</td><td>HD10428–47</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>        I=1   I=2   I=3   I=4   I=5
 L=5      ·     ·     ·     ·     ·
 L=4      ·     ·    R6     ·     ·
@@ -2082,37 +2075,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <li><strong>Sleeper cell (L=2, I=4–5)</strong>: R1, R5, R8 — low-likelihood but catastrophic-if-triggered institutional risks.</li>
 <li><strong>Chronic cell (L≥3, I=3)</strong>: R6, R7, R14 — ongoing political/operational threats requiring sustained monitoring.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives">Top-5 risk deep dives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12">R2 — HD03252 ECHR challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives">Top-5 risk deep dives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-5-risk-deep-dives"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12">R2 — HD03252 ECHR challenge (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r2--hd03252-echr-challenge-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: Bill passes → enters force 2026-08-01 → first operational incident Q4 2026 → domestic court appeals → ECtHR filing Q2–Q4 2027 → judgment 2028–2029.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: NGO statements within 30 days of promulgation; academic-commentary pattern.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: A formal proportionality clause added before third reading.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12">R3 — Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12">R3 — Kriminalvården Q2 capacity miss (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r3--kriminalvården-q2-capacity-miss-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: HD01CU25 sets capacity baseline → Q2 actual falls short → HD03252 operational impacts amplify → legal exposure under R2 compounds.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: PIR-5 Q2 report.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Pre-emptive Kriminalvården communication on capacity realism.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12">R6 — S cost-of-living campaign traction (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12">R6 — S cost-of-living campaign traction (L×I = 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r6--s-cost-of-living-campaign-traction-li--12"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: S HD10447 traction during May → drivmedel cluster gains summer salience → pre-election polling shift by August.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: DN/SvD editorial alignment by 2026-05-15; YouGov/Novus polling shift.
 <strong>Mitigation</strong>: Coalition positive-agenda launch.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10">R1 — CRR3/CRD6 transposition miss (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10">R1 — CRR3/CRD6 transposition miss (L×I = 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r1--crr3crd6-transposition-miss-li--10"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: FiU fails to schedule by 2026-05-15 → summer recess consumed → autumn rush → incomplete transposition by 2027 deadline → EU infraction.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: PIR-1 FiU calendar.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9">R14 — Summer-recess compression (L×I = 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9">R14 — Summer-recess compression (L×I = 9)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r14--summer-recess-compression-li--9"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Pathway</strong>: 4 bills + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations = high schedule compression → substantive debate quality degrades.
 <strong>Early signals</strong>: Any bill withdrawn or postponed from committee in May 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-aggregate-risk-posture">Aggregate risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-posture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-aggregate-risk-posture">Aggregate risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-aggregate-risk-posture"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Net risk score</strong>: 15 risks × average L×I of 8.3 = <strong>baseline political risk environment: ELEVATED</strong></li>
 <li><strong>Direction of change vs prior 7 days</strong> (from sibling risk-assessments): ↑ +1 quintile — driven by simultaneous legal+operational+financial triple.</li>
 <li><strong>Heat cell concentration</strong>: 2 risks in the (3,4)-(4,4) quadrant — both on HD03252.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling risk-assessment.md files.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Kent-SWOT with TOWS matrix per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 6</code>.
 Actor of analysis: <strong>The Tidö coalition government (M-KD-L + SD support party)</strong> as it approaches September 2026 election.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2149,7 +2141,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>Legislative throughput — 4 propositions on a single day, 9 active bills</td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>SD coalition discipline intact — zero counter-motions on 9 bills</td><td>Motion registry (72h window)</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>EU-alignment track record (CRR3/CRD6, tachograph)</td><td>HD03253, HD03256</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>Personal PM signature on all four props — concentrates credibility</td><td>Signing block on HD03252/253/256/3104</td></tr><tr><td>S5</td><td>Administrative capacity backbone — Kriminalvården Q2 reporting</td><td>HD01CU25</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2186,7 +2178,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence (dok_id)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>W1</td><td>L (Liberals) out of lead-minister rotation — signals internal weight loss</td><td>Today's 4-bill batch (zero L leads)</td></tr><tr><td>W2</td><td>HD03252 proportionality design legally thin — ECHR litigation risk</td><td>KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td>W3</td><td>HD03253 transposition timeline tight — missed EU deadline possible</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>W4</td><td>Kriminalvården capacity plan unproven against demand curve</td><td>CU25 subtext</td></tr><tr><td>W5</td><td>No positive agenda on cost-of-living — exposed to S wedge</td><td>HD024082 + HD10447</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2223,7 +2215,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence / path</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>O1</td><td>Pre-recess "legacy-set" framing if all 4 bills pass by June</td><td>Committee calendar</td></tr><tr><td>O2</td><td>Banking-sector credit with orderly CRR3 transposition</td><td>HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>O3</td><td>Kriminalvården Q2 "delivery moment" — visible capacity expansion</td><td>HD01CU25</td></tr><tr><td>O4</td><td>Quiet co-option of MP's krigsmateriel bill (peel ethical voters)</td><td>HD024096 (low-cost signal)</td></tr><tr><td>O5</td><td>Economic-credibility narrative via skr debt management</td><td>HD03104</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2270,7 +2262,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence / trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>ECHR challenge to HD03252 within 18 months</td><td>KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>Missed EU banking transposition deadline</td><td>PIR-1</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>S successful cost-of-living campaign (drivmedel + SME sick-pay)</td><td>HD024082, HD10447</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>L-coalition fracture on HD03252 proportionality</td><td>PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td>Riksbank-independence debate re-opening (sleeper)</td><td>HD01FiU23</td></tr><tr><td>T6</td><td>Opposition coordination on utvisning/bifurcation</td><td>HD024090/95/97, HD01SfU23</td></tr><tr><td>T7</td><td>Late-cycle capacity slippage in Kriminalvården</td><td>CU25 operational risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2292,7 +2284,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td><strong>SO — Delivery-credibility sprint</strong>: S1/S4 × O1/O3. Finish 4 bills + CU25 Q2 delivery milestone on the same pre-recess timeline. Yields "We deliver" narrative.</td><td><strong>ST — Proportionality defence</strong>: S1 × T1/T4. Leverage parliamentary majority to add a formal proportionality safeguard to HD03252, pre-empting ECHR challenge and L fracture.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td><strong>WO — Positive-agenda gap close</strong>: W5 × O5. Use HD03104 debt-management skr as platform for a pre-recess cost-of-living communication push. Partial, but better than silence.</td><td><strong>WT — Defensive containment</strong>: W1/W3 × T2/T3. Accept that HD03253 may slip to autumn; pre-announce a transposition roadmap. On L, pre-emptively float a minor HD03252 amendment to prevent open fracture.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition">TOWS strategic recommendations (for intelligence consumers, not the coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition">TOWS strategic recommendations (for intelligence consumers, not the coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coalition"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>For parliamentary watchers</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Monitor L's JuU statements on HD03252 for the first-week-of-May proportionality amendment. If L supports amendment, coalition is reinforced; if L opposes, first real fracture of mandate.</li>
@@ -2311,18 +2303,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers-not-the-coa
 <ul>
 <li>S has chosen its campaign terrain (economy). V has chosen rights. MP has chosen ethics. C has chosen migration-flank differentiation. <strong>Four separate campaign arcs in one reporting day</strong> — a first in this mandate.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-net-swot-balance">Net SWOT balance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-swot-balance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-net-swot-balance">Net SWOT balance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-swot-balance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Strengths (5) > Weaknesses (5)</strong> but substantively equal — Tidöavtalet delivery is real but fragile.</li>
 <li><strong>Opportunities (5) ≈ Threats (7)</strong> — threats narrowly outnumber opportunities.</li>
 <li><strong>Net strategic position</strong>: <em>coalition is delivering on its legacy agenda but accumulating latent risks</em> — precisely the position a pre-election incumbent adopts when converting political capital to policy durability.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: Kent-SWOT synthesis of all sibling SWOT analyses + cross-type strategic framing.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Political-threat taxonomy + attack-tree per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 8</code>.
 <strong>Scope</strong>: Threats to democratic accountability, institutional integrity, and rule-of-law durability exposed by today's legislative batch — not security threats to individuals or infrastructure.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2392,7 +2383,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy">Threat taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat class</th><th>Manifestation today</th><th>Severity</th><th>Direction (↑/↓/→)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td>Rights erosion via coercive-authority expansion</td><td>HD03252 benefit restrictions</td><td>HIGH</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td>Rule-of-law bifurcation</td><td>HD01SfU23 two-track migration</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Institutional capture (central bank)</td><td>HD01FiU23 recurring Riksbank critique</td><td>MEDIUM (latent)</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>Legislative throughput at expense of deliberation</td><td>4 props + 5 bet in one day</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td>EU-compliance late-failure</td><td>HD03253 tight timeline</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>→</td></tr><tr><td>T6</td><td>Opposition atomization</td><td>S/V/MP/C four separate arcs</td><td>LOW (for gov) / HIGH (for opposition cohesion)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T7</td><td>Coalition discipline hardening (SD zero motions)</td><td>9-bill silence</td><td>LOW (not a threat today)</td><td>↑</td></tr><tr><td>T8</td><td>Populist media framing of coalition-discipline</td><td>"SD vetoes everything" narrative risk</td><td>LOW</td><td>→</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case">Attack tree — "HD03252 becomes a legitimacy-damaging rights case"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case">Attack tree — "HD03252 becomes a legitimacy-damaging rights case"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case"></a></h3>
 <pre><code>ROOT: HD03252 enters force 2026-08-01 and triggers domestic/ECHR challenge
 ├── Branch A: Bill passes without proportionality safeguard
 │   ├── A1: Government holds firm on Tidö framework
@@ -2410,7 +2401,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-becomes-a-legitimacy-damaging-rights-case">Attac
     └── D1: 2028–2029 ECtHR judgment (L=0.3 conditional on C reach)
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Compound probability of adverse ECHR judgment within 30 months</strong>: ≈ 5–9% (0.7 × 0.5 × 0.3). <strong>Low absolute but high-impact.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping">Threat × stakeholder mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping">Threat × stakeholder mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2489,10 +2480,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat--stakeholder-mapping">Threat × stakeholder mapping<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Coalition</th><th>Opposition</th><th>Civil society</th><th>EU</th><th>Markets</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1</td><td><strong>Benefits</strong> (campaign)</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Watches</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T2</td><td><strong>Benefits</strong> (campaign)</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Watches</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T3</td><td>Mixed</td><td>Watches</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Watches</td><td><strong>Opposes</strong></td></tr><tr><td>T4</td><td>Benefits</td><td>Watches</td><td>Opposes</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T5</td><td><strong>Loses</strong> (if realized)</td><td>Benefits</td><td>Neutral</td><td><strong>Opposes</strong></td><td>Opposes</td></tr><tr><td>T6</td><td>Benefits</td><td><strong>Loses</strong></td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T7</td><td>Benefits</td><td><strong>Loses</strong></td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>T8</td><td>Loses slightly</td><td>Benefits</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Neutral</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment">Asymmetric-threat assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment">Asymmetric-threat assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-asymmetric-threat-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>Most of today's threats are <strong>structural-institutional</strong> rather than acute. The one acute threat surface is HD03252's rights-regime footprint: a single operational incident in Q3 2026 could catalyze an outsized rights-NGO and international response.</p>
 <p>The sleeper asymmetric threat is <strong>T3 (Riksbank independence)</strong>: very low probability in the next quarter, but if activated, would have an outsized effect on Swedish financial-market reputation — a classic black-swan-shaped risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-to-pir-mapping">Threat-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-to-pir-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-to-pir-mapping">Threat-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-to-pir-mapping"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>T1 → PIR-2 (L fracture) + PIR-4 (SD discipline on HD03252)</li>
 <li>T2 → Watchlist (HD01SfU23 Q2 audit)</li>
@@ -2503,17 +2494,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-to-pir-mapping">Threat-to-PIR mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>T7 → Standing PIR-A (SD motion filings)</li>
 <li>T8 → N/A (media-framing watchlist only)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers">Counter-threat recommendations (for intelligence consumers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers">Counter-threat recommendations (for intelligence consumers)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-threat-recommendations-for-intelligence-consumers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Parliamentary observers</strong>: Prioritize attention to L in May on HD03252 proportionality; attention to FiU calendar on HD03253.</li>
 <li><strong>Market analysts</strong>: Monitor HD03253 transposition timeline + HD01FiU23 speaker list.</li>
 <li><strong>Civil-liberty NGOs</strong>: Pre-position legal-readiness for HD03252 ECHR challenge starting 2026-Q4.</li>
 <li><strong>EU desk officers</strong>: Track Swedish CRR3 transposition status weekly.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-type synthesis of threat profiles from sibling threat-analysis artifacts.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25">HD01CU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2524,7 +2514,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25">HD01CU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2535,7 +2525,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2546,7 +2536,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2557,7 +2547,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10447">HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>See aggregated analysis in:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>../intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
@@ -2568,11 +2558,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10447">HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <p>Primary sibling folder analyses under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code> carry the single-type deep treatment.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Election date</strong>: September 2026 (statutory cycle)
 <strong>T-minus</strong>: ~5 months
 <strong>Baseline question</strong>: How does today's legislative batch reshape the 2026 campaign arc?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-todays-election-relevant-signals">Today's election-relevant signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-election-relevant-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-todays-election-relevant-signals">Today's election-relevant signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-todays-election-relevant-signals"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2611,38 +2601,38 @@ <h2 id="rm-todays-election-relevant-signals">Today's election-relevant signals<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Signal</th><th>Campaign implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PM personally signs 4 propositions</td><td>Coalition concentrates credibility in PM office — presidentialization of the M-KD-L-SD arrangement</td></tr><tr><td>SD zero counter-motions</td><td>Coalition-discipline narrative available to government ("partner of confidence delivers")</td></tr><tr><td>S leads 12/16 interpellations + drivmedel motion</td><td>S chooses cost-of-living as primary campaign terrain</td></tr><tr><td>V leads rights-maximalism (HD024095)</td><td>V targets left-libertarian voters; differentiates from S</td></tr><tr><td>MP krigsmateriel motion</td><td>MP targets ethical-progressive voters; classic MP move</td></tr><tr><td>C three utvisning counter-motions</td><td>C targets migration-policy flank; differentiates from S</td></tr><tr><td>L absent from lead ministries</td><td>L's campaign faces "what did we actually deliver?" question</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-campaign-arc-reading">Campaign-arc reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-arc-reading"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd">Coalition (M-KD-L + SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-campaign-arc-reading">Campaign-arc reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-arc-reading"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd">Coalition (M-KD-L + SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-m-kd-l--sd"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: "We delivered" — 4-bill legacy + SD discipline + Kriminalvården capacity + banking transposition</li>
 <li><strong>Vulnerability</strong>: Cost-of-living exposure; no positive fiscal story; L internal tension</li>
 <li><strong>Key pre-election event</strong>: Summer-recess communication sprint on all 4 bills passed</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-s-social-democrats">S (Social Democrats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-social-democrats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-social-democrats">S (Social Democrats)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-social-democrats"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: "Cost of living; government serves large capital, not families" — drivmedel + SME sick-pay + fiscal critique</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Concentrate fire on economic axis; cede rights/ethics to V/MP/C</li>
 <li><strong>Key test</strong>: Does Busch's HD10447 response on 2026-05-07 open a pathway for S to pivot to "failed response" narrative?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-v-left">V (Left)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-left"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-v-left">V (Left)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-v-left"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: Rights-maximalism; defense of migrants and detainees</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Differentiate left flank from S on identity issues</li>
 <li><strong>Key test</strong>: Will HD024095 vote pattern reveal V-MP-C coordination or fragmentation?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-mp-green">MP (Green)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-green"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-mp-green">MP (Green)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mp-green"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: Ethical/climate-adjacent wedges (krigsmateriel)</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Revival of traditional MP identity via ethical-policy motions</li>
 <li><strong>Key test</strong>: Do MP polling numbers move on the krigsmateriel angle?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-c-centre">C (Centre)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-centre"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c-centre">C (Centre)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-centre"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Core message</strong>: Migration-flank differentiation</li>
 <li><strong>Strategy</strong>: Maintain urban-rural-centre voter base</li>
 <li><strong>Risk</strong>: Visibility remains low</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking">Coalition scenario probabilities (T+5 months, forward-looking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking">Coalition scenario probabilities (T+5 months, forward-looking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2675,7 +2665,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-scenario-probabilities-t5-months-forward-looking">Coalition
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Coalition outcome 2026</th><th>Probability</th><th>Driver</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M-KD-L + SD re-elected (majority/supported)</td><td>0.38</td><td>S1 scenario plays out</td></tr><tr><td>S + V + MP (+ C?) forms government</td><td>0.30</td><td>S2 scenario + polling shift</td></tr><tr><td>Fragmented result; protracted formation</td><td>0.25</td><td>S3 scenario + volatility</td></tr><tr><td>Minority caretaker</td><td>0.07</td><td>S4 or combination</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Probabilities sum</strong>: 1.00 ✅</p>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0">Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0">Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2737,7 +2727,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-prediction-placeholder-v0">Seat-prediction placeholder (v.0)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>2022 result (seats)</th><th>Current polling est.</th><th>Pre-election trajectory (est)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>~33% → ~115 seats</td><td>Trending +</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>~18% → ~62 seats</td><td>Flat → -</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>~19% → ~67 seats</td><td>Flat</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>~8% → ~28 seats</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>~6% → ~21 seats</td><td>Flat</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>~4% → ~14 seats</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>~4% → ~14 seats</td><td>Flat</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>~3% → ~11 seats</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: Placeholder estimates; primary polling data ingest pending; this artifact's purpose is campaign-narrative inference, not precision seat forecast.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-election-strategic-map">Pre-election strategic map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-strategic-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-election-strategic-map">Pre-election strategic map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-strategic-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   Today["2026-04-24\nLegislative sprint"] --> Busch["2026-05-07\nBusch SME response\n(PIR-3)"]
   Today --> FiU["2026-05-15\nHD03253 FiU sched.\n(PIR-1)"]
@@ -2753,14 +2743,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-pre-election-strategic-map">Pre-election strategic map<a class="" ari
   class Today today
   class Busch,FiU,L pir
   class Summer,Campaign,Election stage</pre>
-<p><em>Source: cross-type inference from sibling folder materials; placeholder quantitative estimates for next-cycle refinement.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Current Riksdag composition</strong> (2022–2026 mandate):</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Total: 349 seats · Majority threshold: 175 seats</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-distribution">Seat distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-distribution">Seat distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2822,8 +2811,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-distribution">Seat distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>Main opposition</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>Government (PM)</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>Support party (Tidöavtalet)</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Government coalition + SD</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>Majority</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition (S+V+C+MP)</strong></td><td><strong>173</strong></td><td><strong>Minority</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids">Projected vote breakdown on today's top-5 dok_ids<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03253 (EU banking) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids">Projected vote breakdown on today's top-5 dok_ids<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-projected-vote-breakdown-on-todays-top-5-dok_ids"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03253 (EU banking) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2901,7 +2890,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03253 (EU banking) —
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>200</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td><td><strong>125</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Bifall med stor majoritet. EU-compliance bills typically pass with broad assent. S abstains (standard on EU-mandated packages); C supports as EU-pragmatist; V likely opposes on ideological grounds; MP abstains.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03252 (detainee benefit restrictions) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown">HD03252 (detainee benefit restrictions) — expected vote breakdown<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2979,7 +2968,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefit-restrictions--expected-vote-breakdown">HD032
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td><strong>10</strong></td><td><strong>6</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td><strong>16</strong></td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>170</strong></td><td><strong>48</strong></td><td><strong>131</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Bifall (170 Ja vs 48 Nej). <strong>However L split (10/6) is a PIR-2 critical signal</strong> — if L unity holds on Ja (16/0), coalition discipline is reinforced. If L dissent is larger (e.g., 6/10 split against), the bill passes with an unusual government-whip failure.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (interpellation, SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (interpellation, SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay"></a></h4>
 <p>Not a vote — Minister Busch responds orally. Formal vote risk: if the interpellation is later converted to a motion or budget amendment, vote arithmetic becomes:</p>
 
 
@@ -3030,7 +3019,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd10447-interpellation-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (interpellation, SME sic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja (for SME reimbursement)</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>M + KD + L + SD</td><td>0</td><td>176</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Bloc total</strong></td><td><strong>149</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Motion outcome</strong>: Avslag (rejected). But the <strong>campaign value</strong> of 149 Ja seats is high — it sets up a 2026 election narrative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report">HD01CU25 (prison capacity committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report">HD01CU25 (prison capacity committee report)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3087,7 +3076,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity-committee-report">HD01CU25 (prison capacity
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M-KD-L-SD</td><td>176</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>307</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td><td><strong>18</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Bifall with broad majority. Coalition + S + C all align on prison capacity; V alone on principled opposition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion">HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion">HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3144,7 +3133,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd024082-s-drivmedel-motion">HD024082 (S drivmedel motion)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja (for motion)</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>107</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>24</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>24</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>M-KD-L-SD</td><td>0</td><td>176</td><td>0</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>149</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td><strong>24</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Projected outcome</strong>: Avslag. Classic S-V-MP bloc vs. M-KD-L-SD bloc with C abstaining.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic">Coalition-discipline diagnostic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic">Coalition-discipline diagnostic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3196,7 +3185,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-discipline-diagnostic">Coalition-discipline diagnostic<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Disciplined vote today?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>Yes</td><td>Full Ja on all coalition bills</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>Yes</td><td>Full Ja</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td><strong>Conditional</strong></td><td>HD03252 proportionality flank — PIR-2</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Yes (disciplined + no motions)</td><td>Zero-motion signal</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Yes (strategic concentration)</td><td>12/16 ip + drivmedel</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Yes (principled maximalism)</td><td>Full avslag on HD03252</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Yes (ethical signalling)</td><td>Krigsmateriel motion</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Yes (flank differentiation)</td><td>Utvisning motions</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check">Mandatsiffror scenario check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check">Mandatsiffror scenario check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If election were held today</strong> (per most recent polling, rounded):</p>
 
 
@@ -3253,18 +3242,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-mandatsiffror-scenario-check">Mandatsiffror scenario check<a class=""
 Opposition (S+V+MP): 115+28+14 = <strong>157</strong> (below threshold, needs C)
 <strong>With C's 21: 178</strong> (majority)</p>
 <p><strong>Under current polling, S + V + MP + C has a narrow majority. But C's willingness to join is an open question — and L's 4%-threshold risk adds volatility.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math">Implication of today's bills on coalition math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math">Implication of today's bills on coalition math<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implication-of-todays-bills-on-coalition-math"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03253 passage</strong>: neutral coalition math (no swing votes at risk).</li>
 <li><strong>HD03252 passage</strong>: depends on L's internal cohesion — if L fractures publicly, coalition narrative weakens in Segment E.</li>
 <li><strong>HD10447 response by Busch</strong>: shapes S's ability to consolidate B + F segments.</li>
 <li><strong>HD024082 + cluster</strong>: baseline campaign fight; vote outcome immaterial, narrative value significant.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: Current Riksdag composition per data.riksdagen.se; projected vote distributions modeled on prior 2022–2026 mandate votes for analogous bills; L split scenarios per PIR-2.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 7-segment post-2022-election taxonomy (refined by 2024 Eurobarometer + SCB socio-economic data).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues">Segment matrix × today's issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues">Segment matrix × today's issues<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3319,39 +3307,39 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-matrix--todays-issues">Segment matrix × today's issues<a cla
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size (est)</th><th>Core concerns</th><th>Today's issue relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>A. Coalition loyalists</strong> (M + KD + SD tail)</td><td>18%</td><td>Law &#x26; order; fiscal conservatism</td><td>Strongly aligned with HD03252, HD01CU25; skeptical of HD03253 costs</td></tr><tr><td><strong>B. S labour loyalists</strong></td><td>22%</td><td>Wage preservation; public services</td><td>Strongly aligned with HD10447, HD024082</td></tr><tr><td><strong>C. Urban progressives</strong> (V + MP + S left)</td><td>14%</td><td>Rights, climate, gender equality</td><td>Aligned with opposition to HD03252; supportive of HD024096</td></tr><tr><td><strong>D. Rural / peripheral SD-leaning</strong></td><td>11%</td><td>Migration, fuel costs, sovereignty</td><td>Ambivalent on HD03253; supportive of HD03252; ambivalent on HD024082</td></tr><tr><td><strong>E. Centrist independents</strong> (C + soft L)</td><td>10%</td><td>Economic pragmatism, stability</td><td>Pragmatic on HD03253; uncertain on HD03252; neutral on HD024082</td></tr><tr><td><strong>F. Low-information / occasional voters</strong></td><td>18%</td><td>Headline issues; cost of living</td><td>Responsive to HD024082; low engagement on prudential HD03253</td></tr><tr><td><strong>G. Disengaged / protest</strong></td><td>7%</td><td>None salient</td><td>Inert today</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-issue-to-segment-mapping">Issue-to-segment mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-to-segment-mapping"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits">HD03252 (detainee benefits)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-issue-to-segment-mapping">Issue-to-segment mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-to-segment-mapping"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits">HD03252 (detainee benefits)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Gains: Segments A (+), D (+)</li>
 <li>Neutral/ambivalent: F, G</li>
 <li>Loses: C (--), E (-)</li>
 <li><strong>Net coalition gain</strong>: +3pp nominal; erodes with each rights-litigation event</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking">HD03253 (EU banking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking">HD03253 (EU banking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Gains: None directly; perceived as "technocratic EU compliance"</li>
 <li>Risk: B (-), F (-) if framed as bank-friendly</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: 0 ± 0.5pp; a technocratic file</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay">HD10447 (SME sick-pay)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S campaign asset: B (+), E (+), F (+)</li>
 <li>Coalition defensive: A (neutral), D (slight +)</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: S net +1.5pp if Busch response is flat-footed</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024082-drivmedel">HD024082 (drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-drivmedel"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024082-drivmedel">HD024082 (drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082-drivmedel"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>S campaign asset: B (+), D (+), F (+)</li>
 <li>Coalition risk: A (neutral), E (-)</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: S net +1pp; classic fuel-politics dynamic</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp">HD024096 (krigsmateriel MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp">HD024096 (krigsmateriel MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-mp"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>MP base signal: C (++) (high-engagement segment)</li>
 <li>No cross-segment reach</li>
 <li><strong>Net electoral effect</strong>: MP +0.3pp; defensive of left flank</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics">Segment-level coalition mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics">Segment-level coalition mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics"></a></h3>
 <p>If by September 2026:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Segments A + D solidly hold for coalition → 29% floor</li>
@@ -3360,7 +3348,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-level-coalition-mathematics">Segment-level coalition mathemat
 <li>Segments B + C solidly hold for S + V + MP → 36% floor</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Pre-election working model</strong>: S-V-MP bloc has a narrow polling advantage (46% vs 43%) with 11% undecided pending cost-of-living debate resolution.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-turnout-sensitivity">Turnout sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-turnout-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-turnout-sensitivity">Turnout sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-turnout-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3387,21 +3375,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-turnout-sensitivity">Turnout sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Turnout</th><th>Coalition advantage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>High turnout (85%+)</td><td>Segment F activated on cost-of-living</td><td>S + V + MP benefit</td></tr><tr><td>Medium turnout (80–85%)</td><td>Standard 2022 dynamics</td><td>Coalition holds</td></tr><tr><td>Low turnout (&#x3C; 80%)</td><td>Segment G dropout benefits concentrated SD/coalition bloc</td><td>Coalition benefits</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings">Messaging alignment (observed from today's filings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings">Messaging alignment (observed from today's filings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-messaging-alignment-observed-from-todays-filings"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Coalition observed messaging</strong>: Delivery + discipline. Aligned with Segments A, D.
 <strong>S observed messaging</strong>: Cost-of-living + SME resilience. Aligned with Segments B, D, F.
 <strong>V observed messaging</strong>: Rights. Aligned with Segment C.
 <strong>MP observed messaging</strong>: Ethics + peace. Aligned with Segment C narrow.
 <strong>C observed messaging</strong>: Migration flank. Aligned with Segment E narrow.
 <strong>L observed messaging</strong>: Silent today. <strong>Risk of Segment E attrition.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway">Key voter-segmentation takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway">Key voter-segmentation takeaway<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-voter-segmentation-takeaway"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's battle lines favor S structurally (B + D + F are economy-responsive). Coalition holds A + D partial; vulnerable on L's representation of E. <strong>MP and V compete for C — to the mutual detriment of S narrative consolidation.</strong></p>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of 2022 election data + 2024–25 Eurobarometer segmentation + sibling-folder inference; primary SCB polling not queried this cycle (use sparingly until monthly refresh).</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Nordic + EU minimum (Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, Netherlands)
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Cross-country parallel-case analysis with normalization for political-system differences, per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 9</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch">Comparator table — policy analogs to today's Swedish batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch">Comparator table — policy analogs to today's Swedish batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3485,8 +3472,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table--policy-analogs-to-todays-swedish-batch">Comparator
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>SE policy</th><th>Closest comparator(s)</th><th>Parallel analogue</th><th>Status abroad</th><th>Lesson for Sweden</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03252 detainee benefit restrictions</strong></td><td>Denmark 2015 "jewelry law" for asylum seekers; Netherlands 2016 detention-conditions restrictions</td><td>State-to-individual coercion layered onto migration/justice framework</td><td>DK: operational but litigated; NL: partially overturned in Raad van State</td><td>Proportionality safeguards essential; ECHR filings follow with 12–24 mo lag</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03253 CRR3/CRD6 transposition</strong></td><td>Germany Kapitaladäquanzverordnung transposition 2024–25; Finland Laki luottolaitostoiminnasta update</td><td>EU prudential package</td><td>DE: transposition complete but with interpretive guidance; FI: on track</td><td>Sweden has options: straight transposition (clean) vs. gold-plated (risk-averse). Germany's interpretive-guidance route balances speed + market clarity</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03256 tachograph regulation</strong></td><td>Germany/Netherlands parallel implementation</td><td>EU transport package</td><td>Both on track</td><td>Routine; low policy risk</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU23 migration law bifurcation</strong></td><td>Denmark bifurcated protection regime (2019); Germany Ankerzentrum framework</td><td>Two-track migration architecture</td><td>DK: stable, critiqued on rights; DE: partial</td><td>Operational complexity is the bottleneck, not legal design</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU25 prison capacity expansion</strong></td><td>Norway tendencies 2023–25 (delayed); Finland capacity plans</td><td>Criminal-justice capacity</td><td>NO: capacity expansion slower than policy targets; FI: modest expansion</td><td>Capacity delivery rarely keeps pace with sentencing-policy changes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10447 SME sick-pay reimbursement</strong></td><td>Norway sykepenger (permanent); Finland sairausvakuutus redesign 2022</td><td>SME labor-cost redistribution</td><td>NO: stable; FI: mildly reduced state share</td><td>SME sick-pay is persistent pre-election lever in Nordic politics</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU23 Riksbank annual review</strong></td><td>Norges Bank annual report; Bank of Finland governance</td><td>Central-bank oversight</td><td>Both: routine and non-controversial</td><td>Sweden's latent political interest in Riksbank independence is distinctive in Nordic context</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024082 drivmedel (fuel tax)</strong></td><td>Norway 2022 drivstoff debates; Germany Tankrabatt 2022</td><td>Fuel-cost political pressure</td><td>NO: recurring campaign issue; DE: short-term subsidies withdrawn</td><td>Fuel-tax politics is highly cyclical — rarely decides elections alone</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096 krigsmateriel export ban (MP motion)</strong></td><td>Germany SPD/Greens coalition 2021 debates; Norway 2024 export restrictions</td><td>Arms-export ethics</td><td>DE: eventual tightening; NO: selective tightening</td><td>Ethical-wedge motions rarely pass but reshape party positioning</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö pre-election legacy sprint</strong></td><td>Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election bill push; Germany Scholz 2024 pre-election push</td><td>Pre-election legacy legislation</td><td>DK: effective, Frederiksen re-elected; DE: ineffective, SPD lost</td><td>Pre-election legacy pushes help coalitions that have successfully delivered; hurt those with unfulfilled promises</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-case-patterns">Cross-case patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-case-patterns"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet">Pattern 1 — "Rights restrictions + migration = litigation magnet"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-case-patterns">Cross-case patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-case-patterns"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet">Pattern 1 — "Rights restrictions + migration = litigation magnet"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet"></a></h4>
 <p>HD03252 + HD01SfU23 follow the Danish and Dutch template of tightening state coercion on migration/justice populations. In both comparator cases:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Implementation was operational within 12–18 months.</li>
@@ -3494,13 +3481,13 @@ <h3 id="rm-pattern-1--rights-restrictions--migration--litigation-magnet">Pattern
 <li>Political durability depended on whether rights-based critique could be reframed as "rule-of-law strengthening".</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Implication for Sweden</strong>: Expect the same trajectory — operational before election, litigation after. The political question is whether the Tidö coalition can frame enforcement as strengthening rule-of-law rather than eroding rights.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political">Pattern 2 — "EU prudential transposition is administrative, not political"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political">Pattern 2 — "EU prudential transposition is administrative, not political"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-2--eu-prudential-transposition-is-administrative-not-political"></a></h4>
 <p>HD03253 CRR3/CRD6 transposition: Germany and Finland demonstrate that prudential transposition rarely becomes a public controversy. <strong>If Sweden slips the deadline, the issue becomes visibility for EU institutional critique — not voter salience.</strong> This is a <strong>regulatory risk, not electoral risk</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive">Pattern 3 — "Fuel-tax politics are durable but rarely decisive"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive">Pattern 3 — "Fuel-tax politics are durable but rarely decisive"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-3--fuel-tax-politics-are-durable-but-rarely-decisive"></a></h4>
 <p>HD024082: Fuel-tax debates are common in Nordic pre-election windows but have not independently flipped an election in the comparator set. Combined with sick-pay (HD10447), they acquire more salience. S's strategy is to bundle these into a cost-of-living omnibus narrative.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden">Pattern 4 — "Central-bank independence — latent but unique to Sweden"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden">Pattern 4 — "Central-bank independence — latent but unique to Sweden"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pattern-4--central-bank-independence--latent-but-unique-to-sweden"></a></h4>
 <p>HD01FiU23: Norway and Finland have not shown political appetite for reviewing central-bank independence. Sweden's latent willingness (SD history) makes this the <strong>only uniquely Swedish institutional risk</strong> in today's batch.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed">Nordic comparator matrix (condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed">Nordic comparator matrix (condensed)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3549,57 +3536,56 @@ <h2 id="rm-nordic-comparator-matrix-condensed">Nordic comparator matrix (condens
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>DK</th><th>NO</th><th>FI</th><th>SE today</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election coalition discipline</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td>HIGH (SD zero motions)</td></tr><tr><td>Migration restriction maturity</td><td>HIGH</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Central-bank politicization risk</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>SME sick-pay politics</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Legislative throughput in pre-election quarter</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH (today = top-5% day)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-eu-level-comparator">EU-level comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-level-comparator"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-eu-level-comparator">EU-level comparator<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-eu-level-comparator"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CRR3/CRD6</strong>: 25/27 member states on track; Sweden currently flag-yellow on timeline.</li>
 <li><strong>ECHR litigation volume</strong>: Sweden historically low (per capita); HD03252 could raise the profile.</li>
 <li><strong>Tachograph compliance</strong>: Routine; no EU risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-comparative-observation">Key comparative observation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-comparative-observation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-comparative-observation">Key comparative observation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-comparative-observation"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's distinguishing feature in this reporting day is not any single policy — each has a Nordic or EU parallel — but the <strong>simultaneous layering</strong> of rights, banking, migration, and fiscal items on a single day. The Danish 2015 "jewellery-law" day was a single-issue spectacle; the German 2024 pre-election push was fiscally concentrated. <strong>Sweden 2026-04-24 is unusual in scope and rhythm combined.</strong></p>
-<p><em>Source: cross-case synthesis drawing on sibling folder comparative analyses + Nordic/EU institutional knowledge from prior monthly-reviews.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Place today's reporting signals in historical context — Swedish and Nordic parliamentary history, with disciplined analogical reasoning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swedish-historical-parallels">Swedish historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994">Parallel 1 — Pre-election sprint of Bildt 1994<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-swedish-historical-parallels">Swedish historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swedish-historical-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994">Parallel 1 — Pre-election sprint of Bildt 1994<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--pre-election-sprint-of-bildt-1994"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Carl Bildt's coalition government in spring 1994 similarly pushed a concentrated reform agenda before the autumn 1994 election.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: Bildt had a weaker parliamentary base; Tidöavtalet has SD support-party architecture.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Concentrated pre-election reform agendas can project competence but require delivery proof — Bildt lost, partly on unemployment. Today's coalition must avoid a similar fate on cost-of-living.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy">Parallel 2 — Reinfeldt 2010 pre-election legacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy">Parallel 2 — Reinfeldt 2010 pre-election legacy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--reinfeldt-2010-pre-election-legacy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Fredrik Reinfeldt's 2010 pre-election legacy-consolidation — tax reforms, school reforms, healthcare standards.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: Reinfeldt held two mandates already; Tidöavtalet is first-mandate.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Legacy consolidation worked for Reinfeldt in 2010 but not in 2014. Today's coalition is in a first-mandate position structurally similar to 2010.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis">Parallel 3 — Löfven 2018 pre-formation crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis">Parallel 3 — Löfven 2018 pre-formation crisis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--löfven-2018-pre-formation-crisis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: 134-day government formation in late 2018–early 2019 demonstrates that Swedish politics tolerates extended formation.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: If the Sept 2026 election produces fragmentation, formation could again be protracted — S's interpellation strategy (HD10447) could become important for post-election bargaining.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited">Parallel 4 — Persson 2006 SME sick-pay revisited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited">Parallel 4 — Persson 2006 SME sick-pay revisited<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--persson-2006-sme-sick-pay-revisited"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Göran Persson's government made SME sick-pay a campaign issue in 2006. Outcome: S lost narrowly.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: SME sick-pay (HD10447) is a recurring Swedish campaign axis. Historical base rate suggests it shifts about 1–2 pp but rarely decides elections alone.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul">Parallel 5 — Riksbank Act 2022 overhaul<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul">Parallel 5 — Riksbank Act 2022 overhaul<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--riksbank-act-2022-overhaul"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Sweden's 2022 Riksbank Act overhaul was the largest institutional change to central-bank governance in decades.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: It was bipartisan.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Riksbank governance rarely polarizes — but if HD01FiU23 opens a political-oversight debate, this would be a <strong>break from the 2022 consensus pattern</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-historical-parallels">Nordic historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push">Parallel 6 — Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election push<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-historical-parallels">Nordic historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-historical-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push">Parallel 6 — Denmark Frederiksen 2019 pre-election push<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-6--denmark-frederiksen-2019-pre-election-push"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Mette Frederiksen's SD government pushed a concentrated pre-election agenda on immigration and welfare in 2019, benefiting from the 2018 sentiment shift.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: SD had just emerged; Frederiksen's base was more centrist.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Pre-election legacy-push succeeded when backed by consistent narrative. Today's Tidöavtalet has discipline (SD) but risks narrative fragmentation (L's quiet absence).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat">Parallel 7 — Norway Solberg 2021 defeat<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat">Parallel 7 — Norway Solberg 2021 defeat<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-7--norway-solberg-2021-defeat"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Erna Solberg's coalition lost 2021 election despite visible pre-election activity.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Legislative throughput alone is insufficient. What matters is how throughput is framed — Solberg's 2021 messaging was diffuse; Frederiksen's 2019 was concentrated.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory">Parallel 8 — Finland Orpo 2023 victory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory">Parallel 8 — Finland Orpo 2023 victory<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-8--finland-orpo-2023-victory"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Petteri Orpo's coalition came to power in 2023 on a very similar M-KD-SD-like framework (Kokoomus-PS-KD-RKP).
 <strong>Relevant lesson</strong>: Fiscal-discipline narrative + coalition-partner-of-confidence strategy can carry centre-right coalitions through pre-election periods — especially if SD-equivalent party maintains support-party discipline. <strong>This is the most direct positive analogue for Sweden's coalition.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-legal-historical-parallels">Legal-historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt">Parallel 9 — 2011 migration bifurcation attempt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-legal-historical-parallels">Legal-historical parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-historical-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt">Parallel 9 — 2011 migration bifurcation attempt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-9--2011-migration-bifurcation-attempt"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: The 2011 Reinfeldt coalition attempted a bifurcated protection regime for migrants; aborted by political-complexity concerns.
 <strong>Differences</strong>: Today's HD01SfU23 is a committee report working on a similar structural idea, with an SD support architecture that was unavailable in 2011.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: What was legally possible but politically infeasible in 2011 may now be achievable — but at the cost of litigation trail.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s">Parallel 10 — ECHR cases against Sweden (2010s)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s">Parallel 10 — ECHR cases against Sweden (2010s)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-10--echr-cases-against-sweden-2010s"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Analogue</strong>: Sweden has received a handful of ECHR adverse judgments on migration/asylum matters in the 2010s, consistently with proportionality gaps.
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Proportionality safeguards added before enactment reduce ECHR exposure substantially — a pre-3rd-reading amendment to HD03252 could move KJ-5 confidence from MEDIUM (55–70%) to LOW (15–30%).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-base-rate-summary">Historical-base-rate summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-base-rate-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-base-rate-summary">Historical-base-rate summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-base-rate-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3641,13 +3627,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-base-rate-summary">Historical-base-rate summary<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Class of event</th><th>Historical base rate</th><th>Today's evidence lean</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-election legacy sprint succeeding</td><td>50–60% (4/7 in Nordic cases since 2000)</td><td>Narrative consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Pre-election cost-of-living wedge deciding election</td><td>10–15% (1/7 cases)</td><td>Wedge exists, not decisive alone</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition fracture in final 6 months before election</td><td>25–30%</td><td>L structural position high-risk</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR adverse judgment within 24 months of enactment</td><td>20–30% (Swedish rights legislation)</td><td>HD03252 fits pattern</td></tr><tr><td>EU transposition deadline miss</td><td>8–15%</td><td>HD03253 within risk band</td></tr><tr><td>Central-bank politicization debate triggered</td><td>&#x3C; 5% (post-2000)</td><td>HD01FiU23 latent only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning">Conclusion from historical reasoning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning">Conclusion from historical reasoning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-conclusion-from-historical-reasoning"></a></h3>
 <p>Today's reporting day fits recurrent Swedish + Nordic patterns but with one distinctive feature: the <strong>simultaneous layering of four policy axes</strong> (rights, banking, migration, fiscal) on a single reporting day. In 25 years of post-2000 Nordic pre-election pushes, single-axis concentration is the norm. A four-axis push is a high-stakes gambit: if executed, it creates a legacy; if any axis breaks, it creates cascading doubt.</p>
-<p><em>Source: Historical synthesis from general Swedish/Nordic parliamentary record; not primary-source queried this cycle.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 4-dimension feasibility assessment (Operational × Fiscal × Legal × Political) per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 7</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items">Feasibility matrix — top legislative items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items">Feasibility matrix — top legislative items<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3734,44 +3719,44 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix--top-legislative-items">Feasibility matrix — top
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Operational</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>Legal</th><th>Political</th><th>Overall</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03252</strong> detainee benefits</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Kriminalvården must scale</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — modest cost</td><td><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong> — ECHR risk</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — L flank</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03253</strong> CRR3/CRD6 transposition</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — FI already prepared</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — redistribution not new cost</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — EU-mandated</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — unified coalition</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03256</strong> tachograph</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — routine</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — minimal</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — EU-mandated</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03104</strong> debt-management skr</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — routine</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU25</strong> prison capacity</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — capacity gap</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — cost</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU23</strong> migration bifurcation</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — Migrationsverket</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — rights-regime</td><td><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU23</strong> Riksbank review</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong> — annual</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — latent risk</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10447</strong> SME sick-pay (proposal from interpellation)</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>LOW</strong> — fiscal cost</td><td><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td><strong>LOW</strong> — government opposed</td><td><strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong> krigsmateriel ban</td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong></td><td><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — WTO/EU considerations</td><td><strong>LOW</strong></td><td><strong>LOW</strong> (if reached vote)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-risk-by-item">Implementation risk by item<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-risk-by-item"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility">HD03252 (detainee benefits) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-risk-by-item">Implementation risk by item<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-risk-by-item"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility">HD03252 (detainee benefits) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252-detainee-benefits--medium-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Kriminalvården must redesign benefit-delivery systems. Capacity expansion required (HD01CU25 tie-in).
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Manageable — estimated ~ 50–150 MSEK in implementation costs.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: ECHR proportionality test is the binding constraint. If proportionality amendment absent, 15–30% chance of adverse ECtHR judgment within 30 months (per <code>devils-advocate.md</code> ACH).
 <strong>Political path</strong>: L flank is the binding risk. Pre-3rd-reading amendment signals probable (coalition incentive to avoid fracture).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility">HD03253 (EU banking) — HIGH feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility">HD03253 (EU banking) — HIGH feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253-eu-banking--high-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: FI operationally ready; transposition is regulatory-text work.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: RWA redistribution is industry-internal; no fiscal cost to Treasury.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: EU-mandated; no domestic legal challenge vector.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: Unified coalition + silent S + supportive C. Opposition on ideological grounds limited to V.
 <strong>Binding constraint</strong>: Parliamentary calendar. If FiU schedules by 2026-05-15, probability of on-time transposition > 85%.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility">HD01CU25 (prison capacity) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility">HD01CU25 (prison capacity) — MEDIUM feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu25-prison-capacity--medium-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Capacity scaling is real and challenging. Q2 report will reveal if plan is achievable.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Costed in current budget cycle; no new funds.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: Uncontested.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: Broad majority support.
 <strong>Binding constraint</strong>: Actual ability to commission beds per timeline.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility">HD10447 (SME sick-pay, if converted to motion) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility">HD10447 (SME sick-pay, if converted to motion) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-sme-sick-pay-if-converted-to-motion--low-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Redesign of Försäkringskassan reimbursement rules.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Estimated 500–1500 MSEK/year in reimbursements — politically charged cost.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: Straightforward.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: Government refuses under current coalition math. Opposition push for campaign narrative value, not immediate legislation.
 <strong>Implementation realistic only post-2026 election under S government</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility">HD024096 (krigsmateriel export ban) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility">HD024096 (krigsmateriel export ban) — LOW feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096-krigsmateriel-export-ban--low-feasibility"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Operational path</strong>: Redesign of ISP approval regime. Significant.
 <strong>Fiscal path</strong>: Indirect costs via industrial contraction.
 <strong>Legal path</strong>: Potential WTO and EU considerations.
 <strong>Political path</strong>: No government majority; symbolic vote.
 <strong>Implementation realistic only under a different coalition</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap">Capacity-versus-ambition gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap">Capacity-versus-ambition gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-versus-ambition-gap"></a></h3>
 <p>The key finding: today's legislative ambition <strong>exceeds</strong> current administrative capacity in two places:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Kriminalvården</strong> (HD03252 × HD01CU25) — bed capacity plan tight</li>
 <li><strong>Migrationsverket</strong> (HD01SfU23) — bifurcation operationalization complex</li>
 </ol>
 <p>Capacity gaps do not prevent enactment but create operational-risk pathways (R3, R7 in <code>risk-assessment.md</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-fiscal-absorption">Fiscal absorption<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-absorption"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fiscal-absorption">Fiscal absorption<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-absorption"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3814,7 +3799,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-fiscal-absorption">Fiscal absorption<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Est. direct cost 2026–2028 (MSEK)</th><th>Budget line</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03252 implementation</td><td>50–150</td><td>Justitiedept + Kriminalvården</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU25 capacity expansion</td><td>1500–2500</td><td>Kriminalvården</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU23 operationalization</td><td>200–500</td><td>Migrationsverket</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253 transposition</td><td>10–30 (regulatory)</td><td>FI</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256 tachograph</td><td>10–30</td><td>Transportstyrelsen</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104 debt mgmt</td><td>0 (informational)</td><td>Riksgälden</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Total new estimated direct fiscal exposure</strong>: ~ 2.0–3.2 BSEK 2026–2028 — modest against national budget; concentrated in justice + migration lines.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping">Capacity bottleneck mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping">Capacity bottleneck mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   HD03252 --> KV["Kriminalvården\n(capacity)"]
   HD01CU25 --> KV
@@ -3826,19 +3811,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-mapping">Capacity bottleneck mapping<a class="" a
   classDef nominal fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#0a0e27
   class KV,MV bottleneck
   class FI,TS,RB nominal</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion">Implementation-feasibility conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion">Implementation-feasibility conclusion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-conclusion"></a></h3>
 <p>Of the four PM-signed propositions, <strong>HD03253, HD03256, and HD03104</strong> are structurally feasible with high confidence. <strong>HD03252</strong> is feasible but depends on capacity delivery at Kriminalvården and proportionality safeguards. The committee reports are similarly tiered — FiU23 and CU25 are high-feasibility; SfU23 faces operational risk.</p>
 <p>The <strong>opposition motion cluster</strong> is structurally infeasible under current coalition math — these motions are campaign-signal tools, not immediate legislative risks.</p>
-<p><em>Source: Synthesis of sibling implementation-feasibility sections + operational-knowledge cross-reference.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) per Heuer, plus formal devil's-advocate challenge to the base narrative (ICD 203 Standard 9).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims">The base narrative (what the synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims">The base narrative (what the synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-the-base-narrative-what-the-synthesis-claims"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>"Tidö coalition is running a coordinated pre-election legacy sprint — 4 PM-signed propositions + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations on one day. SD discipline is intact (zero motions). Opposition has atomized into 4 separate arcs (S economy, V rights, MP ethics, C migration-flank). The day reveals a high-confidence political-rhythm reading."</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination">H1 — "Calendar coincidence, not coordination"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination">H1 — "Calendar coincidence, not coordination"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 4-prop + 5-bet + 16-ip concentration is a calendar-rhythm coincidence driven by committee deadlines, session pacing, and parliamentary filing windows — not a deliberately orchestrated sprint.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3853,7 +3837,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h1--calendar-coincidence-not-coordination">H1 — "Calendar coinciden
 <li>SD zero motions against 9 bills is statistically distinctive.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: H1 accounts for 15–25% of variance. The baseline narrative (H0) is still more parsimonious.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal">H2 — "Coalition-fragility signal, not confidence signal"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal">H2 — "Coalition-fragility signal, not confidence signal"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The PM-signature concentration is not a sign of confidence but of <strong>crisis management</strong> — the PM personally shepherds bills because ministerial trust is low, not high. L's absence from lead roles is not structural; it is a current crisis.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3868,7 +3852,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h2--coalition-fragility-signal-not-confidence-signal">H2 — "Coaliti
 <li>SD's zero motions contradicts fragility reading — fragile coalitions would leak.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: H2 accounts for 10–15% of variance. A latent warning to monitor, not the primary reading.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint">H3 — "Strategic convergence, not sprint"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint">H3 — "Strategic convergence, not sprint"<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The appearance of a "sprint" is a retrospective frame. What the coalition is doing is <strong>routine legacy consolidation</strong> — bills that have been in pipeline for 6–18 months happen to mature at similar cadence. The political-rhythm reading assigns strategy to what is pipeline physics.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3882,9 +3866,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-h3--strategic-convergence-not-sprint">H3 — "Strategic convergence,
 <li>PM personal signing is not routine; it is selective.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: H3 accounts for 20–30% of variance. Part-true but incomplete.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint">H0 — The base narrative ("coordinated pre-election legacy sprint")<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint">H0 — The base narrative ("coordinated pre-election legacy sprint")<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h0--the-base-narrative-coordinated-pre-election-legacy-sprint"></a></h4>
 <p>Still carries 55–65% of variance — the most parsimonious explanation combining signing-pattern + SD-discipline + opposition-atomization + effective-date clustering.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3963,7 +3947,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th>H0 (sprint)</th><th>H1 (coincidence)</th><th>H2 (fragility)</th><th>H3 (convergence)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PM personally signs 4 props</td><td>++</td><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>Effective dates cluster summer 2026</td><td>++</td><td>-</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>SD zero counter-motions</td><td>++</td><td>0</td><td>--</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>No L lead ministers</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>++</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>16 interpellations in 72h</td><td>+</td><td>+</td><td>+</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>Summer-recess compression</td><td>+</td><td>++</td><td>0</td><td>++</td></tr><tr><td>Drivmedel cluster 3-party coordination</td><td>+</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR-latent proportionality gap</td><td>+</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>Sibling-folder consistency (4 independent narratives converge)</td><td>++</td><td>--</td><td>-</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Legend: ++ strong support · + moderate support · 0 neutral · - mild contradiction · -- strong contradiction</p>
 <p><strong>Weighted ACH result</strong>: H0 dominates (+11) vs H1 (-2), H2 (+1), H3 (+3). H3 is the most viable alternative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-falsification-tests">Falsification tests<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-falsification-tests"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-falsification-tests">Falsification tests<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-falsification-tests"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>For H0 to be falsified</strong>:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>SD files a counter-motion on any of the 9 active bills within 30 days</li>
@@ -3976,7 +3960,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-falsification-tests">Falsification tests<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 <li>Historical average shows that 4 PM-signed bills in one day is normal (it is not — this is top-1% rare)</li>
 <li>Other Nordic or EU governments show identical cyclic pattern</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking">Red-team challenge to the DIW ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking">Red-team challenge to the DIW ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Challenge</strong>: "You rank HD10447 (single interpellation) at DIW 3.85, higher than HD03253 (EU-mandated transposition) at 3.80. This is wrong — an interpellation is non-binding, a transposition is legally binding."</p>
 <p><strong>Response (after red team check)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3986,7 +3970,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge-to-the-diw-ranking">Red-team challenge to the DIW
 <li>The two are near-tied (3.85 vs 3.80); the ranking is sensitive to ±0.1 perturbation.</li>
 <li><strong>Concession</strong>: If the audience is legal/market, HD03253 should be first. If political-strategy, HD10447 first. The synthesis leads with HD03253 on consequence grounds — this resolves the apparent contradiction.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-alternative-framework-check">Alternative-framework check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-framework-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alternative-framework-check">Alternative-framework check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-framework-check"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>If we apply a pure legalist framework (rather than political-rhythm)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Ranking becomes: HD03253 > HD03252 > HD01FiU23 > HD03256 > HD01CU25 > HD03104 > HD10447 > motions cluster</li>
@@ -4000,12 +3984,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-alternative-framework-check">Alternative-framework check<a class="" a
 <li>Narrative shifts to "coercive-authority expansion quarter"</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The choice of framework matters. The base narrative has been tested under three framings; the political-rhythm framing best accommodates all the evidence.</p>
-<p><em>Source: internal devil's-advocate challenge; ACH matrix per Heuer ICD 203-compliant methodology; red-team ranking challenge.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: 7-dimension taxonomy per <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Step 3 · Classification</code>.
 Dimensions: Topic · Stakeholder · Urgency · Scope · Impact · Controversy · Decision-lens.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix">Top-tier document classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix">Top-tier document classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4122,8 +4105,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-tier-document-classification-matrix">Top-tier document classifica
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Topic</th><th>Primary stakeholder</th><th>Urgency</th><th>Scope</th><th>Impact</th><th>Controversy</th><th>Decision-lens</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>HD03253</strong></td><td>EU-mandated banking prudential transposition (CRR3/CRD6)</td><td>Regulators + 4 major banks + SME credit</td><td>HIGH (EU deadline)</td><td>Domestic + EU compliance</td><td>HIGH — capital requirements</td><td>MEDIUM — technical</td><td>Committee schedule + transposition design</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03252</strong></td><td>Coercive-authority expansion (detainee benefit restrictions)</td><td>Civil-liberty NGOs + detainees + prison staff</td><td>MEDIUM (1 Aug 2026)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>HIGH — rights regime</td><td>HIGH — L flank, V opposition</td><td>Parliamentary proportionality amendment</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD10447</strong></td><td>Fiscal redistribution — SME sick-pay reimbursement</td><td>SMEs + employer organizations + S strategy team</td><td>MEDIUM (2026-05-07)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — small but symbolic fiscal</td><td>MEDIUM — campaign wedge</td><td>Minister Busch public response</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01CU25</strong></td><td>Criminal justice — prison capacity</td><td>Kriminalvården + JuU + CU</td><td>MEDIUM (Q2 review)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>HIGH — operational</td><td>LOW — bipartisan floor</td><td>Bed-count audit</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024082</strong></td><td>Energy/fuel pricing regulation</td><td>S fiscal team + motor-industry + consumers</td><td>MEDIUM (summer recess)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — consumer</td><td>MEDIUM — classic left-right</td><td>Summer-recess debate scheduling</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01SfU23</strong></td><td>Migration law bifurcation</td><td>Migrationsverket + SfU + civil society</td><td>MEDIUM (Q2)</td><td>Domestic + EU</td><td>HIGH — bifurcated rights regime</td><td>HIGH — L/MP flank</td><td>Bifurcation threshold</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD01FiU23</strong></td><td>Central-bank oversight</td><td>Riksbank + FiU + markets</td><td>LOW (annual cycle)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — credibility</td><td>LOW (today) but latent</td><td>Independence-debate trigger</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03256</strong></td><td>Transport regulation (tachograph)</td><td>Transport industry + TU</td><td>LOW (routine)</td><td>Domestic + EU harmonization</td><td>LOW</td><td>LOW</td><td>Committee passage</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD024096</strong></td><td>Arms-export ethics</td><td>MP ethical-policy team + UU + defense industry</td><td>LOW (signaling)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>LOW (no majority)</td><td>MEDIUM — moral-wedge</td><td>Coalition-fracture test</td></tr><tr><td><strong>HD03104</strong></td><td>Debt-management skr</td><td>FiU + Riksgälden</td><td>LOW (annual)</td><td>Domestic</td><td>MEDIUM — fiscal credibility</td><td>LOW</td><td>Budget-context framing</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-topic-clustering">Topic clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-topic-clustering"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion">Cluster A · Coercive-authority expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-topic-clustering">Topic clustering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-topic-clustering"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion">Cluster A · Coercive-authority expansion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03252 (detainee benefits)</li>
 <li>HD01CU25 (prison capacity)</li>
@@ -4131,7 +4114,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-a--coercive-authority-expansion">Cluster A · Coercive-author
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: State-to-individual coercion in the Tidöavtalet framework</li>
 <li><strong>Cluster controversy</strong>: HIGH (L + V + MP + civil liberty NGOs active)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional">Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional">Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03253 (EU banking)</li>
 <li>HD01FiU23 (Riksbank)</li>
@@ -4139,27 +4122,27 @@ <h3 id="rm-cluster-b--fiscal--institutional">Cluster B · Fiscal / institutional
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: Macro-institutional architecture</li>
 <li><strong>Cluster controversy</strong>: MEDIUM (technical debates, ideological latent)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography">Cluster C · Opposition economic counter-choreography<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography">Cluster C · Opposition economic counter-choreography<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-c--opposition-economic-counter-choreography"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD024082 + HD024092 + HD024098 (drivmedel)</li>
 <li>HD10447 + 11 other S interpellations</li>
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: S-led cost-of-living campaign sequencing</li>
 <li><strong>Cluster controversy</strong>: MEDIUM (classic left-right but high pre-election salience)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput">Cluster D · Low-controversy throughput<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput">Cluster D · Low-controversy throughput<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-d--low-controversy-throughput"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03256 (tachograph)</li>
 <li>HD01AU15 (ILO)</li>
 <li>HD01CU29 (EV infrastructure)</li>
 <li><strong>Common feature</strong>: Routine EU-harmonization or bipartisan passages</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-urgency-distribution">Urgency distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-urgency-distribution">Urgency distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-urgency-distribution"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH (within 30 days of action trigger)</strong>: 1 · HD03253</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM (within 90 days)</strong>: 6 · HD03252, HD10447, HD01CU25, HD024082, HD01SfU23, (drivmedel cluster)</li>
 <li><strong>LOW (routine cycle)</strong>: 10 · remaining items</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-coverage-map">Stakeholder coverage map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-coverage-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-coverage-map">Stakeholder coverage map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-coverage-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4210,13 +4193,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-coverage-map">Stakeholder coverage map<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Count of today's dokuments touching them</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Civil-liberty / rights NGOs</td><td>4 (HD03252, HD01SfU23, HD01CU25, utvisning cluster)</td></tr><tr><td>Banking and financial sector</td><td>2 (HD03253, HD01FiU23)</td></tr><tr><td>SMEs and employer organizations</td><td>2 (HD10447, indirectly HD024082)</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition S apparatus</td><td>16+ (interpellation stream + drivmedel)</td></tr><tr><td>Kriminalvården</td><td>2 (HD03252, HD01CU25)</td></tr><tr><td>Transport industry</td><td>1 (HD03256)</td></tr><tr><td>Defense industry</td><td>1 (HD024096)</td></tr><tr><td>Consumers (motor fuel)</td><td>1 (HD024082 cluster)</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>2 (HD03253, HD01SfU23)</td></tr><tr><td>Markets / investors</td><td>3 (HD01FiU23, HD03253, HD03104)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4">Cross-classification coverage check (ICD 203 Standard 4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4">Cross-classification coverage check (ICD 203 Standard 4)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-classification-coverage-check-icd-203-standard-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All 19 consolidated dok_ids appear in at least one row above.</li>
 <li>All top-5 DIW items (HD10447, HD03253, HD03252, HD01CU25, HD024082) appear in the top block.</li>
 <li>No dok_id appears in more than one cluster without explicit cross-reference (Cluster A — HD01SfU23; Cluster C — HD024082; handled as cluster-level memberships only).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-lens-output">Decision-lens output<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-lens-output"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-lens-output">Decision-lens output<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-lens-output"></a></h3>
 <p>For each high-DIW item, the <strong>single decision</strong> this classification enables:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03253</strong>: Should FiU schedule a hearing before 2026-05-15? → PIR-1.</li>
@@ -4225,11 +4208,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-lens-output">Decision-lens output<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 <li><strong>HD01CU25</strong>: Will Q2 Kriminalvården capacity report confirm the +5200 bed plan? → PIR-5.</li>
 <li><strong>HD024082 + cluster</strong>: Will a formal summer-recess fuel-price interpellation round be scheduled? → Watchlist.</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>Source: cross-reads of all 4 sibling classification-results.md files; cross-type topic-cluster synthesis.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Function</strong>: Traceability web linking every claim to source artifacts per Tier-C aggregation contract.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-internal-artifact-dependencies">Internal artifact dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-internal-artifact-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-internal-artifact-dependencies">Internal artifact dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-internal-artifact-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
   DM[data-download-manifest] --> EB[executive-brief]
   EB --> SS[synthesis-summary]
@@ -4253,9 +4235,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-internal-artifact-dependencies">Internal artifact dependencies<a clas
   IF --> FI[forward-indicators]
   FI --> CRM[cross-reference-map]
   CRM --> README[README]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory">Sibling-folder citations (Tier-C mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory">Sibling-folder citations (Tier-C mandatory)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations-tier-c-mandatory"></a></h3>
 <p>Evening analysis aggregates and cross-references today's four single-type analyses. Sibling paths — all under <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/</code>:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — coalition prop-signing pattern</li>
@@ -4264,7 +4246,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24propositions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/
 <li><code>devils-advocate.md</code> — H1/H2/H3 on sprint thesis</li>
 <li><code>forward-indicators.md</code> — PIR-1 anchor date</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>classification-results.md</code> — S/V/MP motion clustering</li>
@@ -4273,21 +4255,21 @@ <h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24motions"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motio
 <li><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code> — campaign-narrative mapping</li>
 <li><code>voter-segmentation.md</code> — segment targeting per motion</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24committeereports"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> — CU25/SfU23/FiU23/AU15/CU29 committee-floor signal</li>
 <li><code>scenario-analysis.md</code> — coalition durability per committee signal</li>
 <li><code>methodology-reflection.md</code> — committee-floor-signal methodology</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/</code><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysisdaily2026-04-24interpellations"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Source artifacts ingested</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>executive-brief.md</code> — S-party 12-of-16 interpellation-filing dominance</li>
 <li><code>significance-scoring.md</code> — HD10447 SME sick-pay tier placement</li>
 <li><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code> — Aftonbladet amplification</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims">Claim-to-source matrix (high-value claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims">Claim-to-source matrix (high-value claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4349,7 +4331,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-claim-to-source-matrix-high-value-claims">Claim-to-source matrix (hig
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Claim in evening-analysis</th><th>Source artifact</th><th>Source folder</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Tidö pre-election legacy sprint" thesis</td><td>synthesis-summary</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"SD zero-motions day = discipline intact"</td><td>motions/classification-results</td><td>motions</td></tr><tr><td>"Prison-capacity bottleneck for HD03252"</td><td>committeeReports/scenario-analysis</td><td>committeeReports</td></tr><tr><td>"S dominates interpellation filings 12-of-16"</td><td>interpellations/executive-brief</td><td>interpellations</td></tr><tr><td>"HD03253 HIGH feasibility transposition"</td><td>propositions/implementation-feasibility</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>"L flank = binding political constraint"</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"4 scenarios sum to 1.00"</td><td>scenario-analysis</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"PIR-1 anchor: FiU schedule by 2026-05-15"</td><td>propositions/forward-indicators</td><td>propositions</td></tr><tr><td>"Coalition math Ja/Nej breakdown per dok_id"</td><td>coalition-mathematics</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>"Historical parallel: 2005/2018 pre-election sprints"</td><td>historical-parallels</td><td>evening-analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-external-authoritative-sources">External authoritative sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-authoritative-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-authoritative-sources">External authoritative sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-authoritative-sources"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4396,32 +4378,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-authoritative-sources">External authoritative sources<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Source</th><th>Usage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Regeringen.se</td><td>SOU 2025:* propositions</td><td>Legal-text reference for HD03252, HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>Riksdagen.se</td><td>Dokument.se</td><td>Dok-id resolution, text of motions</td></tr><tr><td>DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen</td><td>Editorial page</td><td>Framing context</td></tr><tr><td>ECHR</td><td>hudoc.echr.coe.int</td><td>HD03252 proportionality precedent</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission</td><td>CRR3/CRD6 directive</td><td>HD03253 transposition context</td></tr><tr><td>SCB</td><td>Statistics Sweden</td><td>Base-rate referents</td></tr><tr><td>ISP</td><td>Inspektionen för strategiska produkter</td><td>HD024091/96 export-control context</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-ingestion">Prior-cycle ingestion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-ingestion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-ingestion">Prior-cycle ingestion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-ingestion"></a></h3>
 <p>Per Tier-C contract, today's analysis ingests <strong>prior-cycle PIRs</strong> from:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/</code> (prior day's evening-analysis, if present) — see <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></li>
 <li><code>analysis/weekly/2026-W17/</code> (prior-week review, if present) — see <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></li>
 <li><code>analysis/monthly/2026-04/</code> (April monthly review, if present) — see <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-reference-targets">Forward-reference targets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-reference-targets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-reference-targets">Forward-reference targets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-reference-targets"></a></h3>
 <p>This evening-analysis cascade will feed forward to:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/weekly/2026-W17/</code> (end-of-week review)</li>
 <li><code>analysis/monthly/2026-04/</code> (end-of-April review)</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-09-*/</code> (election-period analyses)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-traceability-verification">Traceability verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-traceability-verification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-traceability-verification">Traceability verification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-traceability-verification"></a></h3>
 <p>Every Key Judgment (KJ1–KJ7) in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> links to ≥ 2 sibling artifacts.
 Every scenario (S1–S4) in <code>scenario-analysis.md</code> links to ≥ 1 PIR in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>.
 Every risk (R1–R15) in <code>risk-assessment.md</code> links to ≥ 1 threat in <code>threat-analysis.md</code> or stakeholder in <code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code>.
 Every forward indicator (F1–F20) in <code>forward-indicators.md</code> links to ≥ 1 PIR in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>.</p>
 <p><strong>No orphan claims detected.</strong></p>
-<p><em>Source: Internal artifact graph + sibling-folder ingestion table.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Self-audit against ICD 203 + Admiralty + WEP standards; explicit Methodology Improvements for next-cycle application.
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling</p>
-<h2 id="rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied">Compliance matrix — tradecraft standards applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied">Compliance matrix — tradecraft standards applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4506,7 +4487,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-compliance-matrix--tradecraft-standards-applied">Compliance matrix 
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Standard</th><th>Requirement</th><th>Where applied in this artifact set</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 1 (Objective)</td><td>No partisan framing</td><td>Every KJ audited against party-neutrality test</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 2 (Independent sources)</td><td>≥ 2 independent sources per KJ</td><td>Sibling folder + primary document evidence chains</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 3 (Timely)</td><td>Every claim tied to time horizon</td><td>All PIRs have explicit deadlines</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 4 (All available sources)</td><td>Evidence diversity</td><td>4 sibling folders + MCP live-check + cached IMF/SCB</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 5 (Tradecraft)</td><td>SATs used</td><td>Kent Scale, Admiralty, ACH, Red Team all applied</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 6 (Quality + credibility)</td><td>Source descriptors</td><td>Admiralty codes A1/B2/C3 on every KJ</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 7 (Uncertainty)</td><td>Explicit probability language</td><td>5-level + Kent Scale ranges</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 8 (Assumptions vs judgments)</td><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>Table in <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>ICD 203 Standard 9 (Alternatives)</td><td>ACH + alternatives</td><td><code>devils-advocate.md</code> with H1/H2/H3</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Admiralty system</td><td>Source reliability (A-F) × information credibility (1-6)</td><td>Applied throughout classification + KJs</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>WEP / Kent Scale</td><td>Verbal-probability-to-numeric calibration</td><td>Highly likely = 70–85%; possible = 30–45%</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>Structured Analytic Techniques</td><td>ACH, Red Team, Devil's Advocate, Key Assumptions Check, SWOT, TOWS</td><td>All applied across artifact set</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit">Party-neutrality arithmetic audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit">Party-neutrality arithmetic audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>Count of party mentions across the 23 artifacts (indicative):</p>
 
 
@@ -4560,7 +4541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic-audit">Party-neutrality arithmetic audit<
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Count</th><th>Framed neutrally</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td>38</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>22</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>18</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>18</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>14</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>12</td><td>✅</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>10</td><td>✅</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Audit conclusion</strong>: All 8 parties mentioned; 8/8 framed in terms of observable actions and strategic-logic interpretation, not moral judgment. The ratio of opposition-to-government mentions (74:74) is perfectly balanced — though this is not a virtue in itself, it reflects the day's genuine political symmetry.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling">Ambiguity and uncertainty handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling">Ambiguity and uncertainty handling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling"></a></h3>
 <p>Where today's artifacts deploy explicit uncertainty markers:</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>"Highly likely"</strong> (70–85%): 5 uses</li>
@@ -4570,24 +4551,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-ambiguity-and-uncertainty-handling">Ambiguity and uncertainty handlin
 <li><strong>"Remote"</strong> (&#x3C; 15%): 1 use (HD01FiU23 → Riksbank independence debate escalation)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Prohibition check</strong>: ✅ No weasel words ("could", "may", "some analysts suggest") without a numeric anchor.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-strengths-observed">Methodology strengths observed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-strengths-observed"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-strengths-observed">Methodology strengths observed<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-strengths-observed"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Cross-type synthesis</strong> is structurally superior to any single-type analysis — the pre-election-sprint reading emerges only by joining prop + motion + bet + ip.</li>
 <li><strong>SD zero-motion silence</strong> was treated as positive evidence (high DIW null-event) rather than absence — a tradecraft maturity marker.</li>
 <li><strong>Prior-cycle PIR ingestion</strong> was completed (Tier-C requirement) — no orphan PIRs remain from prior cycles.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle">Methodology Improvements (for next cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <p>Three named improvements for the next reporting cycle:</p>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index">Methodology Improvement 1 — <strong>Quantitative coalition-discipline index</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index">Methodology Improvement 1 — <strong>Quantitative coalition-discipline index</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-1--quantitative-coalition-discipline-index"></a></h4>
 <p>Today I inferred "SD discipline intact" from a zero-motion count over 72 hours. A more rigorous measurement would construct a discipline index over a rolling 30-day window comparing SD motion-filing rate against prior Tidö periods and the 2022–2026 mandate baseline.</p>
 <p><strong>Action for next run</strong>: Build <code>scripts/coalition-discipline-index.ts</code> using <code>riksdag-regering-search_dokument</code> with filter <code>parti=SD</code> + <code>doktyp=mot</code> + rolling window. Record baseline and today's delta.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments">Methodology Improvement 2 — <strong>ECHR-case-law-anchored confidence for rights judgments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments">Methodology Improvement 2 — <strong>ECHR-case-law-anchored confidence for rights judgments</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-2--echr-case-law-anchored-confidence-for-rights-judgments"></a></h4>
 <p>Today I asserted (KJ-5) that HD03252 has a ~55–70% probability of ECHR challenge within 18 months. This confidence rests on subject-matter intuition rather than a structured case-law taxonomy.</p>
 <p><strong>Action for next run</strong>: Build a reference table of recent ECtHR Article 3/8 cases on detainee conditions (win/loss rates, timelines, facts) and anchor future rights-litigation probabilities to the empirical base rate.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database">Methodology Improvement 3 — <strong>Pre-election-sprint comparator database</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database">Methodology Improvement 3 — <strong>Pre-election-sprint comparator database</strong><a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvement-3--pre-election-sprint-comparator-database"></a></h4>
 <p>Today I used Nordic + EU comparators (Denmark 2019, Germany 2024, etc.) qualitatively. For recurrent Tier-C evening analyses during the pre-election window, a structured comparator database with normalized features (seats-swing, pre-election bill volume, coalition-party count) would elevate the comparative-international artifact from descriptive to explanatory.</p>
 <p><strong>Action for next run</strong>: Build <code>analysis/references/pre-election-sprint-comparators.md</code> with 8–12 normalized cases from 2015–2024.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis">Limitations of today's analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis">Limitations of today's analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Single-day snapshot</strong> — today's high-DIW reading could be smoothed against a 30-day moving average.</li>
 <li><strong>No primary survey data</strong> — polling inferences rely on secondary market commentary.</li>
@@ -4595,7 +4576,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-limitations-of-todays-analysis">Limitations of today's analysis<a cla
 <li><strong>Sibling-folder dependence</strong> — this evening analysis inherits framing from morning analyses; independent re-derivation was partial.</li>
 <li><strong>IMF/SCB data not directly queried this cycle</strong> — carried forward from monthly-review.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration">Process audit — time and iteration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration">Process audit — time and iteration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Wall-clock budget</strong>: 60 minutes end-to-end (Timer A) | 28 minutes to PR call (Timer B)</li>
 <li><strong>Pass 1 time</strong>: Approximately 20–25 minutes to produce 23 artifacts</li>
@@ -4603,7 +4584,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-process-audit--time-and-iteration">Process audit — time and iterati
 <li><strong>AI-FIRST compliance</strong>: Minimum 2 iterations met; all claims reviewed against alternatives</li>
 <li><strong>Shortcut discipline</strong>: All 23 artifacts produced with substantive content; no boilerplate</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis">Next-cycle handoff package (for tomorrow's morning analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis">Next-cycle handoff package (for tomorrow's morning analysis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>PIR-1–PIR-7 explicit in intelligence-assessment.md</li>
 <li>Standing PIRs A/B/C carried forward</li>
@@ -4611,14 +4592,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-next-cycle-handoff-package-for-tomorrows-morning-analysis">Next-cycle
 <li>Methodology Improvements 1–3 flagged for implementation</li>
 <li>Carried-forward Scenario monitoring plan</li>
 </ol>
-<p><em>Source: self-audit against <code>analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> + <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md §Self-Audit Checklist</code>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: <code>news-evening-analysis</code> · <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24906725202 · <strong>UTC</strong>: 2026-04-24T19:00:52Z
 <strong>Requested date</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Effective date</strong>: 2026-04-24 · <strong>Window</strong>: today + 7-day lookback for sibling integration</p>
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Classification</strong>: OPEN · Public sources only (GDPR Art. 9(2)(e,g))
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) — primary Riksdag open-data via MCP <code>get_sync_status</code> returned <code>status: live</code> at 19:00:52Z</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-health-at-start">MCP health at start<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health-at-start"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-health-at-start">MCP health at start<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health-at-start"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4655,9 +4635,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mcp-health-at-start">MCP health at start<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Server</th><th>Status</th><th>Latency</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>riksdag-regering</td><td>live</td><td>&#x3C; 1s</td><td><code>get_sync_status</code> returned <code>{status:"live"}</code></td></tr><tr><td>scb</td><td>available</td><td>—</td><td>Not queried today (Tier-C ingests sibling economic context)</td></tr><tr><td>world-bank</td><td>available</td><td>—</td><td>Non-economic residue only (WGI), not required today</td></tr><tr><td>github</td><td>available</td><td>—</td><td>Used for artifact staging</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model">Primary data sources (Tier-C ingestion model)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model">Primary data sources (Tier-C ingestion model)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-data-sources-tier-c-ingestion-model"></a></h3>
 <p>This is a <strong>Tier-C aggregation workflow</strong> — the primary data inputs are the four sibling per-type analyses already produced for 2026-04-24. Per <code>ext/tier-c-aggregation.md §Cross-type synthesis</code>, the evening-analysis reads sibling folders and cites them. No fresh per-<code>dok_id</code> downloads are required at this stage; all <code>dok_id</code> provenance is already resolved in the sibling manifests.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-sibling-folders-read-today">Sibling folders read (today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders-read-today"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sibling-folders-read-today">Sibling folders read (today)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folders-read-today"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4689,9 +4669,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-sibling-folders-read-today">Sibling folders read (today)<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling folder</th><th>Path</th><th>Lead documents ingested</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>propositions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/</code></td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104 (4 government bills)</td></tr><tr><td>motions</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/</code></td><td>20 opposition motions filed 2026-04-15 → 2026-04-17 against 9 props</td></tr><tr><td>committeeReports</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/</code></td><td>HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23, HD01AU15, HD01CU29</td></tr><tr><td>interpellations</td><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/</code></td><td>HD10447 (lead) + HD10428–HD10446 (15 additional)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd">Reference Analyses (sibling synthesis ingestion per ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd">Reference Analyses (sibling synthesis ingestion per ext/tier-c-aggregation.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-reference-analyses-sibling-synthesis-ingestion-per-exttier-c-aggregationmd"></a></h4>
 <p>Every sibling <code>synthesis-summary.md</code>, <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>, and <code>executive-brief.md</code> was read and incorporated into this evening-analysis. Unique <code>dok_id</code> references extracted: <strong>44</strong> (4 propositions + 20 motions + 5 committee reports + 16 interpellations − overlap). Open PIRs carried forward: see <code>intelligence-assessment.md §Prior-cycle PIR ingestion</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings">Per-document table (consolidated across siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings">Per-document table (consolidated across siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -4879,15 +4859,15 @@ <h3 id="rm-per-document-table-consolidated-across-siblings">Per-document table (
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Committee</th><th>Party/Actor</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Full-text status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Restricted detainee benefits (säkerhetsförvaring)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>JuU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Strömmer M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>EU Banking Package (CRR3/CRD6)</td><td>Proposition</td><td>FiU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Wykman M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Tachograph enforcement</td><td>Proposition</td><td>TU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Carlson KD)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>5-year debt-management evaluation</td><td>Skrivelse</td><td>FiU</td><td>Reg. (Kristersson/Wykman M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024082</td><td>S drivmedel counter-motion (prop 236)</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td>S (Andersson M.)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024091</td><td>V krigsmateriel amendments</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td>V</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024092</td><td>V drivmedel counter-motion</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td>V</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024096</td><td>MP export ban krigsmateriel</td><td>Motion</td><td>UU</td><td>MP</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024098</td><td>MP drivmedel counter-motion</td><td>Motion</td><td>FiU</td><td>MP</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024090</td><td>C utvisning systematik-krav</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td>C</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024095</td><td>V utvisning full avslag</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td>V</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD024097</td><td>MP utvisning motion</td><td>Motion</td><td>SfU</td><td>MP</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU25</td><td>Prison capacity expansion</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>Reg. (Kriminalvården)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SfU23</td><td>Migration bifurcation (study/research)</td><td>Bet</td><td>SfU</td><td>Reg. (Forssmed KD)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU23</td><td>Riksbank annual review</td><td>Bet</td><td>FiU</td><td>Riksbanken</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01AU15</td><td>ILO ratification</td><td>Bet</td><td>AU</td><td>Reg. (Forssell M)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU29</td><td>EV charging infrastructure</td><td>Bet</td><td>CU</td><td>Reg. (Carlson KD)</td><td>A1</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD10447</td><td>S sick-pay reimbursement (SME)</td><td>Ip</td><td>NU</td><td>S (Lundqvist P.)</td><td>A2</td><td>Full text</td></tr><tr><td>HD10428–HD10446</td><td>Interpellation batch (S × 12, SD × 2, C × 1, Indep × 1)</td><td>Ip</td><td>Various</td><td>Opposition</td><td>A2</td><td>Metadata + full text</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Full per-document detail lives in each sibling folder's <code>documents/</code> subdirectory. This evening-analysis references but does <strong>not duplicate</strong> those files (see <code>cross-reference-map.md §Sibling folders</code>).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>riksdag-regering</code>: healthy throughout the run. No retries required.</li>
 <li><code>scb</code>: not queried (economic context carried forward from sibling analyses and IMF cache).</li>
 <li><code>world-bank</code>: not queried (non-economic residue not required for today's themes).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retrieval-timestamps">Retrieval timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retrieval-timestamps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retrieval-timestamps">Retrieval timestamps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retrieval-timestamps"></a></h3>
 <p>All sibling folders last written 2026-04-24 between 06:00Z (propositions) and 18:30Z (interpellations) per <code>git log</code> on each folder. This evening-analysis folder created 2026-04-24T19:01Z.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-hash">Provenance hash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-hash"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-hash">Provenance hash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-hash"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: Swedish Riksdag open data (data.riksdagen.se) — A1</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary</strong>: Regeringen pressroom / regeringen.se — A1–A2</li>
@@ -4895,6 +4875,37 @@ <h2 id="rm-provenance-hash">Provenance hash<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <li><strong>Tradecraft</strong>: ICD 203, Admiralty 6×6, SATs (ACH, Red Team, Key Assumptions Check) applied per <code>analysis/methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code></li>
 </ul>
 <p>— End of manifest —</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU25-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -4944,7 +4955,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:11.708Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:33.276Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html b/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html
index 15106e10d9..556e979364 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Interpellation Debates">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.960Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.527Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:11.960Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.527Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Debates","description":"A single new interpellation (HD10447, S) was announced today, forcing Energy- och näringsminister Ebba Busch (KD) to defend the 2024 abolition of the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement by 2026-05-07.","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:11.960Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Debates","description":"A single new interpellation (HD10447, S) was announced today, forcing Energy- och näringsminister Ebba Busch (KD) to defend the 2024 abolition of the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement by 2026-05-07.","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:33.527Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,25 +216,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>A single new interpellation (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">HD10447</a>, S) was announced today, forcing Energy- och näringsminister <strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong> to defend the 2024 abolition of the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement by <strong>2026-05-07</strong>. The item is low in legislative velocity but strategically significant because it reopens the SME-growth narrative four months before the September 2026 election. Confidence MEDIUM — single-source day with rich policy history (<code>A2</code> Admiralty).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial</strong>: Should today's political-intelligence lede lead with HD10447 or cluster it as part of the week's S-interpellation campaign pattern (HD10428–HD10447, 16 items in 3 weeks, 12 of them S)? <em>Recommendation: cluster-frame with HD10447 as anchor</em> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: Should we escalate the sick-pay-cost reimbursement to the <strong>election-2026</strong> watchlist as a defined SME-economics wedge? <em>Recommendation: yes, tier-2 indicator</em> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Editorial calendar</strong>: Should we pre-schedule a follow-up piece for the <strong>2026-05-07</strong> ministerial response window? <em>Recommendation: yes, lock 05-07/05-08 window</em> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a> trigger IT-1.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">📌 60-second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">📌 60-second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>What happened</strong> — Patrik Lundqvist (S) filed an interpellation asking whether Minister Busch (KD) will review the effects on SMEs of abolishing the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement (in force 2016–2024). <code>dok_id: HD10447</code> <code>A2</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Why it matters</strong> — Frames the Kristersson government's 2024 SME-cost decision as a growth drag vs Europe; Sweden's underperformance vs EU average since 2023 is embedded in the text. Economic wedge, pre-election.</li>
 <li><strong>Who's on the hook</strong> — Minister Busch (KD) must respond by <strong>2026-05-07</strong>; pressure also implicates Finance Minister Svantesson (M) on fiscal trade-offs.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order signal</strong> — S has filed <strong>12 of 16</strong> interpellations in the HD10428–HD10447 window (75%); SD 2, C 1, independent 1. Pattern: opposition stress-testing the government's economic record.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>IT-1 · 2026-05-07</strong> — Minister Busch's written answer. If the minister declines to re-examine the policy, expect S to escalate via a subsequent motion or budget amendment in the 2026/27 budget round (autumn).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--visual--significance-snapshot">📊 Visual — Significance snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--visual--significance-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual--significance-snapshot">📊 Visual — Significance snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual--significance-snapshot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Interpellation significance (DIW × electoral-horizon impact)
     x-axis "Low legislative velocity" --> "High legislative velocity"
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--visual--significance-snapshot">📊 Visual — Significance snapshot
     "HD10444 arb.giv.avg": [0.28, 0.55]
     "HD10443 social dumping": [0.26, 0.48]
     "HD10439 police shortage": [0.22, 0.62]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--companion-files"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-companion-files"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — integrated picture</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a> — Key Judgments + PIRs</li>
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a> — dated triggers</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — 5-dimension register</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--sources">📜 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">📜 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2)</li>
 <li>SCB labour-market tables (referenced for SME cost context): <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a> (A2)</li>
@@ -263,10 +263,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--sources">📜 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h3>
 <p>The single new interpellation announced in chamber today — <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html"><code>HD10447</code></a> <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em> (Patrik Lundqvist, S → Energi- och näringsminister Ebba Busch, KD) — should be framed as the <strong>anchor of a three-week S-opposition interpellation campaign</strong> on SME-cost and labour-market issues rather than a standalone procedural filing. Evidence: 12 of 16 interpellations in the HD10428–HD10447 window (75%) are S-filed; at least 4 (HD10443 social dumping, HD10444 <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> loopholes, HD10446 false death declarations, HD10447 sick-pay) target labour/social-protection policy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -314,14 +314,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th><code>dok_id</code></th><th>Title</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><code>HD10447</code></td><td>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</td><td align="center"><strong>0.62</strong></td><td>05-07 (answer), Sep 2026 (election)</td><td>Today's only new IP; reopens 2024 budget decision; economic wedge; cites Sweden-vs-EU growth gap</td></tr><tr><td align="center">—</td><td><code>HD10444</code></td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>2026-05</td><td>Complementary SME-cost IP (S, 2026-04-22) — same analytical cluster</td></tr><tr><td align="center">—</td><td><code>HD10443</code></td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td align="center">0.48</td><td>2026-05</td><td>Labour cluster (S, 2026-04-22)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">—</td><td><code>HD10439</code></td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td align="center">0.62</td><td>2026-05</td><td>Separate security-salience cluster (S, 2026-04-20)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>DIW inputs: document-type weight (interpellation = 0.4 base) × ministerial-seniority weight (Energy/Industry = high for SME issues, 1.4) × electoral-horizon multiplier (1.1 for SME economics) × stakeholder-concentration factor (1.0).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Opposition strategy</strong> — S is using the interpellation tool (low legislative cost, public chamber answer) to force televised ministerial accountability on <strong>SME cost structure</strong> in the five-month window before the September 2026 election. The HD10447 text explicitly frames Sweden's post-2023 underperformance vs EU growth as partly attributable to the government's removal of the sick-pay reimbursement.</li>
 <li><strong>Minister exposure</strong> — Ebba Busch (KD), as Energy- och näringsminister, personally owns both the SME narrative and (via the 2024 budget decision) the removal of the reimbursement. Answering on 2026-05-07 she will be forced to either defend the 2024 decision, promise a review, or signal no change. All three answers have electoral costs.</li>
 <li><strong>Structural context</strong> — Small-business sick-pay burden has been studied by Tillväxtverket and Svenskt Näringsliv for two decades. The 2016–2024 <em>ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader</em> was the main state-borne mitigation. Abolishing it shifted ~SEK 1–1.5 bn/year of risk onto employers (baseline estimate, 2023 budget bill impact assessment).</li>
 <li><strong>Pattern signal</strong> — Interpellation volume from S is rising: 12 in 3 weeks is above the 2025/26 session average (~3/week from S). This is consistent with a pre-summer accountability push targeting the autumn budget debate.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-article-framing">Recommended article framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-article-framing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-article-framing">Recommended article framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-article-framing"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lede</strong>: HD10447 as anchor + cluster-level take on the S economic campaign.</li>
 <li><strong>Nut graf</strong>: Why the 2024 reimbursement removal is back on the agenda now.</li>
@@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-recommended-article-framing">Recommended article framing<a class="" a
 <li><strong>Section 3</strong>: Broader interpellation pattern (HD10428–HD10447) — 12/16 S-filed, showing opposition's use of the tool.</li>
 <li><strong>Section 4</strong>: Election-2026 linkage — SME-cost wedge as one of five emerging S campaign themes.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Headline</strong> (EN, 68 chars): "Opposition reopens Sweden's sick-pay reimbursement fight ahead of 2026"</li>
 <li><strong>Headline</strong> (SV, 76 chars): "Oppositionen återöppnar striden om ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description</strong> (EN, 156 chars): "Socialdemokraten Patrik Lundqvist has filed interpellation HD10447, pressing Minister Ebba Busch (KD) to review the 2024 abolition of SME sick-pay aid."</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-visual">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
   S[S opposition&#x3C;br/>12 IPs in 3 weeks]
   S --> C1[SME-cost cluster&#x3C;br/>HD10444 HD10447]
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
   style C3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style C4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style E fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10447 full text: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2)</li>
 <li>HD10428–HD10447 interpellation set: <code>get_interpellationer</code> batch, 2026-04-24 (A2)</li>
@@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Standing PIRs addressed</strong>: PIR-2 (legislative activity), PIR-3 (opposition coordination), PIR-5 (pre-election narrative formation), PIR-6 (coalition fissures).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high">Key Judgment 1 — Coordinated S campaign (Confidence: <strong>HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high">Key Judgment 1 — Coordinated S campaign (Confidence: <strong>HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high"></a></h3>
 <p>S is waging a pre-budget and pre-election coordinated interpellation campaign on SME / labour-cost policy, of which HD10447 is the fourth labour-policy filing in three weeks. <em>[Source: internal cluster HD10428–HD10447 · Admiralty A2 · cluster count 12/16 S-filed]</em></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: cluster density, topic coherence, similar pattern observable in 2018 and 2022 pre-election windows.</li>
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high">Key Judgment
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Low — judgment holds even if HD10447 alone were isolated; the cluster is independently attested.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-3 (opposition coordination), PIR-5.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high">Key Judgment 2 — Minister likely to defend (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high">Key Judgment 2 — Minister likely to defend (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister Busch is most likely (50% + 20% = 70%) to respond with either a full defence (Scenario 1) or a partial-review offer (Scenario 2) on 2026-05-07, not a reinstatement signal. <em>[Source: 2022–2025 Tidö IP answers pattern · A2]</em></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: Tidö ministers have answered 87% of reopened-budget IPs with a defensive or status-quo frame (<code>analysis/data/</code> — observed base-rate on 164 such answers).</li>
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high">Key
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Medium — a surprise review offer would flip S's rhetorical payoff.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-2, PIR-5.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium">Key Judgment 3 — KD brand vulnerability (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium">Key Judgment 3 — KD brand vulnerability (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium"></a></h3>
 <p>KD carries asymmetric political risk from HD10447: its "<em>företagens parti</em>" self-branding is tested by a policy its minister implemented. A visible misstep — even absent coalition fracture — hands S a lasting rhetorical asset. <em>[Source: 2022 KD manifesto + 2024 abolition timeline · A2]</em></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: KD polling in small-business cohort declined from 2024H1 to 2025H2 (Företagarna brand surveys); HD10447 is a targeted probe.</li>
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium">Key Judgmen
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: High — depends on whether press picks up the story.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-5, PIR-6.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium">Key Judgment 4 — Narrow policy-surprise window (Confidence: <strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium">Key Judgment 4 — Narrow policy-surprise window (Confidence: <strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium"></a></h3>
 <p>There is a narrow (10–15%) window in which HD10447 catalyses either a formal review or informal KD policy drift (Scenarios 2+4 cumulative = 30%). Window closes after 2026-05-07 answer.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: scenario-analysis.md probability assignment (20% + 10%).</li>
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium">
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Very High — small evidence shifts move probability markedly.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-2, PIR-6.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements">Information gaps / collection requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements">Information gaps / collection requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -426,22 +426,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements">Information gaps / collect
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gap</th><th>Collection action</th><th>By when</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S leadership position on HD10447 messaging</td><td>Monitor S party website + front-bench press</td><td>2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td>Företagarna / Svenskt Näringsliv response</td><td>Watch sector press 2026-04-28 through 2026-05-06</td><td>2026-05-06</td></tr><tr><td>Additional S interpellations on SME labour cost</td><td>Daily riksdag-regering poll for <code>parti:S iid:SME</code></td><td>daily</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen internal M-KD positioning</td><td>Not publicly observable — caveat</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary">Alternative analysis (Devil's Advocate summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary">Alternative analysis (Devil's Advocate summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>See <code>devils-advocate.md</code>. Alternative framings H2 (constituency-driven) and H3 (KD-fracture signalling) scored lower but remain logged; rebase if coordination signals fail to emerge by 2026-05-06.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-scale-legend">Confidence scale legend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-scale-legend"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-scale-legend">Confidence scale legend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-scale-legend"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>VERY HIGH</strong>: convergent high-quality A1 sources; multi-method corroboration.</li>
 <li><strong>HIGH</strong>: strong A2 sources + internally-consistent pattern; independent corroboration.</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH / MEDIUM</strong>: partial corroboration or base-rate extrapolation.</li>
 <li><strong>LOW-MEDIUM / LOW</strong>: single source or speculative inference.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-consistency--change">Consistency &#x26; change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consistency--change"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-consistency--change">Consistency &#x26; change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consistency--change"></a></h3>
 <p>Consistent with <code>historical-parallels.md</code> pattern of pre-election S wedge campaigns. Material change if 2026-05-07 answer is a review signal — rebase Judgments 2 and 3.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: DIW weighting (Data-Importance-Weight) per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a> §DIW.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (shortened)</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">HD10447</a></td><td>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</td><td align="center"><strong>0.62</strong></td><td align="center">L2+ Priority</td><td>Only new IP today; reopens a 2024 fiscal decision with measurable SME impact; directly cites Sweden-vs-EU growth gap; wedge-ready</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447">DIW breakdown — HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447">DIW breakdown — HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -514,13 +514,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447">DIW breakdown — HD10447<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Value</th><th align="center">Contribution</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document type (interpellation)</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">0.40</td></tr><tr><td>Ministerial seniority (Energy &#x26; Industry, cabinet-level)</td><td align="center">× 1.4</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">+0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral horizon (Sep 2026, 5 months)</td><td align="center">× 1.1</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">+0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder concentration (SMEs, ~1.2M firms)</td><td align="center">× 1.0</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">0.00</td></tr><tr><td>Framing salience (links to GDP growth, fiscal policy)</td><td align="center">× 1.05</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">+0.02</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total DIW</strong></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"><strong>0.62</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Base 0.40 → adjusted 0.62 after multipliers. Keeps item inside the L2+ Priority tier.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity">Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity">Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If the minister's 2026-05-07 answer signals review → DIW rises to ~0.75 (L3 Intelligence-grade).</li>
 <li>If the answer is flat refusal with no new data → DIW drops back to 0.48 (L2 Strategic).</li>
 <li>If S escalates with a motion before 2026-06-21 session-end → cluster DIW rises to 0.82 (L3).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual">Cluster-level scoring (contextual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual">Cluster-level scoring (contextual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -557,14 +557,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual">Cluster-level scoring (contextual)<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster (HD10428–HD10447 window)</th><th>Member dok_ids</th><th align="center">Cluster DIW</th><th align="center">Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SME-cost economics</td><td>HD10444 (S, 04-22) · HD10447 (S, 04-23)</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td>Labour / social protection</td><td>HD10443 · HD10440 · HD10446 (S, 04-21/22)</td><td align="center">0.58</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr><tr><td>Security / policing</td><td>HD10439 Stockholm police shortage (S, 04-20)</td><td align="center">0.62</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare</td><td>HD10432 · HD10442 (S, 04-15/21)</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking">Priority signal — bullet ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking">Priority signal — bullet ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">HD10447</a> — <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em>, DIW 0.62 — wedge-ready (A2).</li>
 <li>HD10444 — <em>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</em>, DIW 0.55 — complementary SME-cost IP (A2), source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a>.</li>
 <li>HD10439 — <em>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</em>, DIW 0.62 — separate salience axis (A2), source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10439.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10439.html</a>.</li>
 <li>HD10443 — <em>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</em>, DIW 0.48 — labour cluster (A2), source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443.html</a>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-1">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-1">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   HD10447["HD10447 · DIW 0.62&#x3C;br/>sick-pay reimbursement"]
   HD10444["HD10444 · DIW 0.55&#x3C;br/>arbetsgivaravgifter"]
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-1">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style HD10443 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style HD10439 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style CL1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2, primary)</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a> (A2)</li>
@@ -587,34 +587,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: Likely media frames for HD10447 and the cluster campaign.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-candidates">Frame candidates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-candidates"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred">Frame A — "Regeringen tog bort stödet — och företagen lider" (S-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-candidates">Frame candidates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-candidates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred">Frame A — "Regeringen tog bort stödet — och företagen lider" (S-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred"></a></h4>
 <p>S narrative frame. Emphasises small-business pain, Swedish growth gap vs EU, KD's "<em>företagens parti</em>" contradiction.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Dagens Arbete, ETC, Aftonbladet (ledar), Arbetet.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Företagarna partial amplification (if they pick the business-cost angle without partisan tie-in).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred">Frame B — "Effektiviserad företagshjälp — inget att ångra" (Tidö-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred">Frame B — "Effektiviserad företagshjälp — inget att ångra" (Tidö-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred"></a></h4>
 <p>Government counter-frame. Emphasises other measures (arbetsgivaravgifter-sänkningar, växa-stöd), administrativ förenkling.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Svenska Dagbladet (borgerlig ledar), Expressen ledar, Bulletin.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Skattebetalarnas förening, Timbro.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish">Frame C — "En kostnad man inte räknat på" (neutral/wonkish)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish">Frame C — "En kostnad man inte räknat på" (neutral/wonkish)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish"></a></h4>
 <p>Analytical / data-centric frame. Cites SCB data, Tillväxtverket rapporter, Finanspolitiska rådet.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Dagens industri, Dagens Nyheter economy section, Sveriges Radio Ekonomiekot.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Academic economists; think tanks.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative">Frame D — "Sverige ut ur Norden" (comparative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative">Frame D — "Sverige ut ur Norden" (comparative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative"></a></h4>
 <p>Comparative/Nordic frame — Sweden as Nordic outlier on SME-sick-pay buffer.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Nordic-oriented outlets, Europaportalen, Altinget.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Nordic labour-market researchers.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07">Frame volume forecast (7-day horizon from 2026-05-07)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07">Frame volume forecast (7-day horizon from 2026-05-07)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
   title Expected coverage volume per frame (articles, D0–D7)
   x-axis [D0, D1, D2, D3, D5, D7]
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07">Frame volume for
   line [0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 2]
   line [0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2]</pre>
 <p>Legend (line order): A (S-frame) · B (Tidö-frame) · C (wonkish) · D (comparative).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-contestation-matrix">Narrative contestation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-contestation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-contestation-matrix">Narrative contestation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-contestation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -661,24 +661,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-contestation-matrix">Narrative contestation matrix<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th align="center">Source authority (Admiralty)</th><th align="center">Public resonance</th><th align="center">Policy-shift leverage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>A — S-preferred</td><td align="center">B2</td><td align="center">HIGH (SME pain)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>B — Tidö-preferred</td><td align="center">B2</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (wonkish offsets)</td><td align="center">HIGH (status-quo preservation)</td></tr><tr><td>C — wonkish</td><td align="center">A2–B1</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH (drives review scenarios)</td></tr><tr><td>D — comparative</td><td align="center">A1</td><td align="center">LOW (abstract)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (intellectual asset for opposition)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk">Disinformation / manipulation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk">Disinformation / manipulation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Statistics cherry-picking</strong>: both sides likely to cherry-pick start/end years on sick-leave cost trends. Standard political-communication pattern; no evidence of malicious disinformation.</li>
 <li><strong>Deepfake / synthetic media</strong>: none detected in prior Tidö-opposition exchanges on this issue; residual baseline risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators">Recommended narrative-monitoring indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators">Recommended narrative-monitoring indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Word-frequency tracking on Mediearkivet: "sjuklönekostnad" · "småföretag" · "företagens parti" · "sjuklön".</li>
 <li>Lead-editorial endorsements DN, SvD, Expressen, Aftonbladet D0–D3.</li>
 <li>Social-media amplification: @socialdemokraterna, @kd, @SvensktNLiv accounts.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — frame typology is grounded in past cluster-campaigns (B2); specific volume forecast is indicative (C3 model output).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: HD10447 <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em>. <strong>Lens</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder matrix per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md"><code>stakeholder-impact.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-matrix">6-lens matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-matrix">6-lens matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -783,13 +783,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-lens-matrix">6-lens matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th align="center">Influence</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Executive</td><td>Energi- och näringsminister <strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong></td><td>Defend 2024 decision; may signal "continued dialogue"</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>HD10447 addressee (A2) <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>1. Executive</td><td>Finansminister <strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong></td><td>Fiscal-rule defensive; unlikely to support reinstatement</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>2024 BP record (A2) <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>2. Legislative</td><td><strong>Patrik Lundqvist (S)</strong> (filer)</td><td>Opposition accountability; pro-review</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>HD10447 signatory (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>2. Legislative</td><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna</strong> party leadership</td><td>Coordinated cluster campaign</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>12/16 cluster IPs (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>2. Legislative</td><td><strong>V / MP / C</strong> (potential co-signers)</td><td>Currently passive on HD10447</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>No co-signature in HD10447 (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>3. Administrative</td><td><strong>Tillväxtverket</strong> (SME agency)</td><td>Historically quantified the 2016–2024 programme</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Tillväxtverket rapport 2023:8 (A2) <a href="https://tillvaxtverket.se/">https://tillvaxtverket.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>3. Administrative</td><td><strong>Försäkringskassan</strong></td><td>Administered the reimbursement 2016–2024</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>FK årsredovisning 2024 (A2) <a href="https://forsakringskassan.se/">https://forsakringskassan.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>4. Industry</td><td><strong>Svenskt Näringsliv</strong></td><td>Pro-reinstatement (has lobbied since 2024)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>2024 remiss submission (A2) <a href="https://svensktnaringsliv.se/">https://svensktnaringsliv.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>4. Industry</td><td><strong>Företagarna</strong></td><td>Strongly pro-reinstatement — core SME constituency</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>2024 policy position (A2) <a href="https://foretagarna.se/">https://foretagarna.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>5. Civil society</td><td><strong>LO</strong> (trade union)</td><td>Focus on worker protection; indirect support for sick-leave buffers</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>LO 2025 arbetslivs-rapport (A2) <a href="https://lo.se/">https://lo.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>5. Civil society</td><td><strong>TCO / SACO</strong></td><td>Neutral-to-supportive on employer burden relief</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>TCO 2024 remiss (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>6. International</td><td><strong>OECD</strong></td><td>Historically flagged SME sick-pay burden as growth-sensitive</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>OECD Economic Survey: Sweden 2023 (A1) <a href="https://www.oecd.org/">https://www.oecd.org/</a></td></tr><tr><td>6. International</td><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>Monitors Swedish fiscal-policy trajectory; no direct line on sick-pay</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>European Semester 2025 report (A1)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-summary">Named actors (summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-summary">Named actors (summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Patrik Lundqvist (S)</strong> — interpellation filer, labour-market focus.</li>
 <li><strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong> — Energy &#x26; Industry Minister, KD party leader since 2015.</li>
 <li><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong> — Finance Minister, fiscal-rule custodian.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   PL[Patrik Lundqvist&#x3C;br/>S filer] -->|files IP| RI[Riksdagen]
   RI -->|delivers| EB[Ebba Busch&#x3C;br/>KD minister]
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
   style SN fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style FO fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style S_party fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-winners--losers-matrix">Winners / losers matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winners--losers-matrix">Winners / losers matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -843,25 +843,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-winners--losers-matrix">Winners / losers matrix<a class="" aria-hidde
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>If minister refuses review</th><th>If minister announces review</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lundqvist / S</td><td>Electoral narrative win</td><td>Procedural win + diluted narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Busch / KD</td><td>Short-term cost; SME-lobby friction</td><td>Possible finance-ministry friction</td></tr><tr><td>SME federations</td><td>No policy gain; messaging leverage</td><td>Direct policy win</td></tr><tr><td>LO</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Indirect win (worker protection)</td></tr><tr><td>M / Svantesson</td><td>Fiscal-rule held</td><td>Potential fiscal-rule friction</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-1">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-1">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — named stakeholders and their historical positions are well-documented; individual response calibration awaits the 2026-05-07 answer.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Dated, observable indicators that will update probability estimates across scenarios. 4 horizons: 72h · week · month · election.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27">Horizon 1 — Next 72h (through 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27">Horizon 1 — Next 72h (through 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>2026-04-25</strong>: Additional S interpellation on labour-cost or SME theme filed. (Tests H1 coordinated campaign.) Source: data.riksdagen.se/dokumentstatus daily poll.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-26</strong>: Företagarna or Svenskt Näringsliv public comment on the abolition or HD10447. Source: organization press pages.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-27</strong>: First national press reference to HD10447 (Mediearkivet scan). Absence = lower H1 weight.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01">Horizon 2 — Next 7 days (through 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01">Horizon 2 — Next 7 days (through 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
 <ol start="4">
 <li><strong>2026-04-29</strong>: S front-bench coordinated statement or op-ed on SME costs. Presence → reinforces H1; absence → shift toward H2.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-30</strong>: KD internal signalling (KD MP op-ed, Företagarna survey release). Presence → reinforces H3 KD-fracture.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-01</strong>: Total count of S labour-cost IPs filed April 2026. Threshold: ≥ 6 = clear coordinated campaign; 3–5 = ambiguous; ≤ 2 = weak H1.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24">Horizon 3 — Month window (through 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24">Horizon 3 — Month window (through 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24"></a></h3>
 <ol start="7">
 <li><strong>2026-05-07</strong>: <strong>SISVA — Minister Busch answers HD10447.</strong> Pivotal indicator. Keyword scan of the answer for: "<em>översyn</em>", "<em>utvärdering</em>", "<em>Tillväxtverket</em>" (→ Scenario 2), "<em>överskottsmålet</em>", "<em>Finanspolitiska rådet</em>" (→ Scenario 3), "<em>förenklat</em>", "<em>växa-stöd</em>" (→ Scenario 1).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-08</strong>: Media coverage volume D+1 after answer (target: ≥ 5 national outlets = narrative capture; ≤ 2 = frame failed).</li>
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24">Horizon 3 — Month windo
 <li><strong>2026-05-20</strong>: Tidö budget-signal leak or FI spring proposition contains any mitigating SME measure.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-24</strong>: 4-week polling update: S vs Tidö delta movement. Baseline delta currently +5 pp red-green; > +6 pp = HD10447 cluster landing; &#x3C; +4 pp = narrative stalled.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13">Horizon 4 — Election window (through 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13">Horizon 4 — Election window (through 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13"></a></h3>
 <ol start="12">
 <li><strong>2026-06-18</strong>: Riksdagens sommaruppehåll begins — narrative locks for summer. Track final positions of all actors heading into recess.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-07Q3</strong>: Sommaravtal (party summer agreements / pre-campaign positioning). Watch for S manifesto inclusion.</li>
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13">Horizon 4 — Election
 <li><strong>2026-08-31</strong>: Late-summer polling snapshot: KD vs 4% threshold (existential for Tidö); S vs 35% (outright-majority reach).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-09-13</strong>: <strong>Valdag — seat allocation</strong>. Ex-post test of voter-segmentation.md shift predictions.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-tracking-matrix">Indicator tracking matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-tracking-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-tracking-matrix">Indicator tracking matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-tracking-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -975,48 +975,48 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-tracking-matrix">Indicator tracking matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Probability-moves scenario</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>New S IP filed</td><td>72h</td><td>S1→S2 weight</td><td>+ H1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Press pickup</td><td>72h</td><td>B-frame vs A-frame</td><td>narrative capture</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>S op-ed</td><td>week</td><td>H1 strength</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>KD signalling</td><td>week</td><td>H3</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>≥6 IPs</td><td>week</td><td>H1 strength</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Answer wording</td><td>month</td><td>Scenario probability</td><td>routes</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Media D+1</td><td>month</td><td>frame landing</td><td>narrative</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Budget-signal</td><td>month</td><td>Scenario 2/4</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Polling delta</td><td>month</td><td>net political impact</td><td>quantified</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Sommaruppehåll positions</td><td>election</td><td>campaign lock-in</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>KD 4% threshold</td><td>election</td><td>coalition-math</td><td>existential</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>Valdag</td><td>election</td><td>ex-post</td><td>final</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-update-frequency">Expected update frequency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-update-frequency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-update-frequency">Expected update frequency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-update-frequency"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Indicators 1–3: poll daily.</li>
 <li>Indicators 4–6: weekly poll.</li>
 <li>Indicators 7–11: event-driven; auto-trigger on 2026-05-07 answer publication.</li>
 <li>Indicators 12–16: monthly cadence through Sep 2026.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-2">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-2">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> on indicator specification (observable, dated, falsifiable). <strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong> on implied probability updates (subject to news-cycle noise).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: Possible outcomes from HD10447 between 2026-05-07 (SISVA) and the 2026-09-13 general election. <strong>Method</strong>: 4 distinct scenarios, probabilities sum to 100%, leading indicator per scenario.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50">Scenario 1 — "Defensive defend" (P = 50%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50">Scenario 1 — "Defensive defend" (P = 50%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister Busch answers on 2026-05-07 defending the 2024 abolition, citing offsetting measures (arbetsgivaravgifter reductions, växa-stöd). No policy change; brief media cycle.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Minister's written answer cites <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> / <em>växa-stöd</em> ≥ 2 times and contains no "review" / "översyn" language.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: S files a motion in autumn 2026 budget round; narrative persists but narrow audience.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: Neutral for Tidö; marginal S gain in SME-owner cohort.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20">Scenario 2 — "Partial review opens" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20">Scenario 2 — "Partial review opens" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister signals a Tillväxtverket-led review of effects on micro-firms (&#x3C; 10 employees). Plays as partial S win, partial KD de-escalation.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Answer contains "Tillväxtverket" + "översyn" / "utvärdering".</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: Review terms released within 60 days; industry federations publish input.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: KD neutralises wedge; S loses unique-ownership claim.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20">Scenario 3 — "Fiscal-rule wall" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20">Scenario 3 — "Fiscal-rule wall" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister — likely backed by Finance Minister Svantesson — answers with a firm fiscal-rule line: no reinstatement path compatible with overskottsmålet at current trajectory. Harder defensive tone than Scenario 1.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Finanspolitiska rådet referenced, or "överskottsmålet" cited ≥ 1 time in the answer.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: S escalates with a co-signed motion invoking V or C to split the fiscal-rule argument.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: Polarises electorate on fiscal-rule question itself; risk for both sides.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10">Scenario 4 — "Coalition drift on KD" (P = 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10">Scenario 4 — "Coalition drift on KD" (P = 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10"></a></h3>
 <p>KD internal business-base pressure (Företagarna, SME owners) produces a quiet policy realignment: partial reinstatement floated informally via KD MPs, even without a formal minister commitment.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: KD MP individual motion or KD-affiliated op-ed citing SME burden within 45 days of the answer.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: Tidö internal negotiation — M / SD resist; public friction visible in press.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: High — exposes Tidö internal divergence on SME policy, core KD brand risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-probability-table">Probability table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-probability-table">Probability table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-probability-table">Probability table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">P</th><th align="center">Cumulative</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 Defensive defend</td><td align="center">50%</td><td align="center">50%</td></tr><tr><td>2 Partial review</td><td align="center">20%</td><td align="center">70%</td></tr><tr><td>3 Fiscal-rule wall</td><td align="center">20%</td><td align="center">90%</td></tr><tr><td>4 Coalition drift on KD</td><td align="center">10%</td><td align="center">100%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-2">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-2">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   MAY7[2026-05-07 answer] --> S1[S1 Defensive defend 50%]
   MAY7 --> S2[S2 Partial review 20%]
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-2">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style S2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
   style S3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style S4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1086,13 +1086,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Risk if wrong</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Minister personally answers (not delegated)</td><td>Low — IPs require ministerial answer by custom</td></tr><tr><td>FI fiscal path unchanged by then</td><td>Low — no BP revision expected before May</td></tr><tr><td>No cross-opposition co-signing before May</td><td>Medium — V could still co-file supporting IPs</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-3">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-3">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — scenarios reflect the observable distribution of past ministerial answers on reopened budget decisions (base-rate ~60% defensive, ~20% partial review, ~15% fiscal-rule wall, ~5% coalition drift based on 2022–2025 IP archive).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: Risks triggered by HD10447 and the wider S-opposition interpellation campaign. <strong>Method</strong>: 5-dimension register (Political / Economic / Institutional / Social / Reputational), L × I scoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Likelihood (1–5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1–5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">R1</td><td>Political</td><td>Minister Busch's 2026-05-07 answer produces a media clip that fuels S election narrative</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">12</td><td>HD10447 SISVA (A2) <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td align="center">R2</td><td>Economic</td><td>Reinstatement of the reimbursement adds ~SEK 1.3 bn/year to the state budget, pressuring FI targets</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td>2024 BP impact assessment (A2) <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td align="center">R3</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Budget-round amendment effort fails for lack of cross-opposition co-signing, weakening S leverage</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD10447 single-signer (A2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R4</td><td>Social</td><td>SME hiring behaviour remains depressed through 2026 H2, reinforcing S claim empirically</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td>SCB arbetsmarknad 2025 Q4 (A2) <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td align="center">R5</td><td>Reputational</td><td>KD loses credibility on pro-business narrative among SME owners</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td>Företagarna 2024 position paper (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   R1[R1 Minister answer&#x3C;br/>media clip] --> R5[R5 KD credibility]
   R4[R4 SME hiring weak] --> R1
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
   style R4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style R5 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style EL fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates">Posterior probabilities (Bayesian updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates">Posterior probabilities (Bayesian updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1204,19 +1204,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates">Posterior probabilities (Ba
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Event</th><th align="center">Prior P</th><th align="center">Posterior P (given HD10447)</th><th align="center">Δ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BP2026/27 S amendment on sick-pay reimbursement</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center"><strong>0.55</strong></td><td align="center">+0.20</td></tr><tr><td>Minister announces policy review in May</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">+0.02</td></tr><tr><td>SME-cost wedge enters top-5 S campaign themes</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center"><strong>0.75</strong></td><td align="center">+0.25</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-opposition IP co-signing in next 30 days</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">+0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance">Mitigations (for an observer, not a partisan stance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance">Mitigations (for an observer, not a partisan stance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Track SCB arbetsmarknad + företagsdynamik releases monthly to empirically test the growth-drag claim.</li>
 <li>Monitor 2026-05-07 response verbatim (chamber transcript) for <em>review / oversight</em> keywords.</li>
 <li>Watch BP2026/27 autumn proposition draft for reinstatement language.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-4">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-4">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — single new document today but rich historical record (2016–2024 programme) and strong cluster context. Admiralty <code>A2</code> for all primary sources.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-s--w--o--t">S / W / O / T<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--w--o--t"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447">Strengths (of the opposition's position on HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-s--w--o--t">S / W / O / T<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--w--o--t"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447">Strengths (of the opposition's position on HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Concrete fiscal reference point</strong> — the 2016–2024 <em>ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader</em> is a documented, costed programme (SEK 1.0–1.5 bn/year) — not abstract rhetoric. Evidence: HD10447 text paragraph 2, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2).</li>
 <li><strong>Coalitional arithmetic</strong> — pressure targets KD specifically, stressing the junior Tidö partner most sensitive to SME narrative. Evidence: <code>HD10447</code> addressed directly to Busch (KD).</li>
@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447">Strengths (of the o
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Supporting evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Documented, costed programme</td><td>HD10447 text; 2023 budget bill at <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Targets junior Tidö partner (KD)</td><td>HD10447 addressee metadata (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Coordinated opposition pattern</td><td>12/16 S-filed IPs in HD10428–HD10447 window (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Low legislative velocity</strong> — an interpellation cannot amend or repeal; it produces a response on the floor, nothing more. Evidence: Riksdagsordningen 8 kap. (A1) <a href="https://riksdagen.se/">https://riksdagen.se/</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>No alternative financing</strong> — HD10447 asks the minister to "see over" the issue but proposes no S alternative funding source. Evidence: text paragraph 6 of <code>HD10447</code> (A2).</li>
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Procedural ceiling</td><td>Riksdagsordningen — source <a href="https://riksdagen.se/">https://riksdagen.se/</a> (A1); no amending power in <code>HD10447</code></td></tr><tr><td>No funding alternative</td><td>HD10447 text, final paragraph (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Single signatory</td><td>HD10447 metadata (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>May 2026 answer</strong> as a televised setpiece (2026-05-07 SISVA). Evidence: HD10447 workflow <em>SISVA: 2026-05-07</em> (A2). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Budget-debate linkage</strong> — reopens a 2024 decision, enabling S to loop it into the autumn 2026/27 budget proposal (BP). Evidence: pattern of S budget amendments cataloged at <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2).</li>
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Televised 2026-05-07 response</td><td>HD10447 SISVA (A2) <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>Budget-round re-entry</td><td>2024 budget bill record <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>SME lobby alignment</td><td>2024 consultation submissions <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position">Threats (to the opposition's position)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position">Threats (to the opposition's position)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government counter-framing</strong> — Busch can pivot to ongoing <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> reductions for young workers and argue the net burden fell. Evidence: 2024 budget bill <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2).</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal constraint line</strong> — Finance Minister Svantesson (M) can frame reinstatement as incompatible with FI's fiscal targets. Evidence: Finanspolitiska rådet 2025 report <a href="https://www.finanspolitiskaradet.se/">https://www.finanspolitiskaradet.se/</a> (A2).</li>
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position">Threats (to the opposition's pos
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Minister counter-frame</td><td>2024 budget bill <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>FI fiscal-rule line</td><td>Finanspolitiska rådet 2025 report (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>IP-topic dilution</td><td>HD10444 at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a> (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1350,12 +1350,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths</th><th>Weaknesses</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO:</strong> Use the televised 2026-05-07 answer to loop the SME-cost claim into the BP2026/27 debate.</td><td><strong>WO:</strong> Co-sign with V and MP ahead of budget round to multiply pressure.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST:</strong> Pre-empt minister counter-frame by citing FR 2025 own assessment of SME cost-sensitivity.</td><td><strong>WT:</strong> Narrow HD10447 narrative to differentiate from HD10444 to avoid dilution.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S-Strength 1 ↔ O-Opportunity 2: documented cost base directly supports a budget-round amendment. Evidence: HD10447 + 2024 BP record.</li>
 <li>W-Weakness 1 ↔ T-Threat 2: procedural ceiling + FI constraint compound into a "symbolic-only" outcome unless paired with a BP motion.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-3">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-3">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT force-field — HD10447 opposition posture
     x-axis "Internal weakness" --> "Internal strength"
@@ -1374,13 +1374,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-3">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
     "FI fiscal line": [0.5, 0.18]</pre>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Frame</strong>: Political-threat taxonomy applied to HD10447 as an opposition accountability instrument. <strong>Method</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md"><code>political-threat-framework.md</code></a> + lightweight MITRE-style TTP mapping for political action.</p>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: MEDIUM · <strong>Severity</strong>: MEDIUM · <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (A2 single-source IP filing, dated 2026-05-07 floor-debate window observable).</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Scope note</strong>: "Threat" in this political intelligence context means <em>actions that may degrade the governing coalition's electoral and legislative standing</em>, not cyber/physical threats. The subject is a legitimate, constitutionally-sanctioned instrument (interpellation). This analysis is descriptive, neutral, and public-source only.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits">Political Threat Taxonomy hits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits">Political Threat Taxonomy hits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits">Political Threat Taxonomy hits<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th align="center">Observed?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Accountability pressure</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>HD10447 directly demands ministerial review (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Narrative reframing</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>Ties Sweden-vs-EU growth gap to the 2024 policy (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition wedge</td><td align="center">PARTIAL</td><td>Targets KD specifically within the Tidö coalition (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Media setup for 2026-05-07 floor speech</td><td align="center">LIKELY</td><td>SISVA date then televised chamber debate (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Disinformation</td><td align="center">NO</td><td>Claims are verifiable against 2024 BP record</td></tr><tr><td>Procedural obstruction</td><td align="center">NO</td><td>Single IP does not block legislation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree">Attack tree (political-action tree)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree">Attack tree (political-action tree)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   ROOT[Goal: Electorally damage Tidö coalition&#x3C;br/>on SME-economics axis]
   ROOT --> A1[Branch A: Force minister&#x3C;br/>on-record commitment/refusal]
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree">Attack tree (political-action tree
   style A2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style A3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style A1x fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages">Chain of political-communications stages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages">Chain of political-communications stages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages">Chain of political-communic
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Activity</th><th>HD10447 observation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Identify policy decisions with measurable constituency impact</td><td>2024 reimbursement abolition identified</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Frame as interpellation with minister addressee</td><td>Lundqvist (S) drafts text citing growth gap</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>File with Riksdagen, schedule chamber announcement</td><td>HD10447 announced 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>Televised chamber answer 2026-05-07</td><td>Pending</td></tr><tr><td>Installation</td><td>Narrative enters media cycle</td><td>Watch: 2026-05-07 through 2026-05-14</td></tr><tr><td>Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Campaign coordination with parallel IPs, press, budget round</td><td>HD10444 companion filed; BP2026/27 pipeline</td></tr><tr><td>Actions on objective</td><td>Vote-share shift on SME-cost axis</td><td>Polling Nov 2025 through Sep 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue">MITRE-style TTP annotation (informal, political-action analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue">MITRE-style TTP annotation (informal, political-action analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1525,32 +1525,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue">MITRE-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP (political)</th><th align="center">Observed</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1: Parliamentary instrument use (IP)</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>HD10447</td></tr><tr><td>T2: Issue-cluster campaign (coordinated IPs)</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>HD10428 through HD10447</td></tr><tr><td>T3: Minister-targeted wedge</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>KD-specific addressee</td></tr><tr><td>T4: Cross-opposition coalition (multi-party co-signing)</td><td align="center">NO</td><td>Single signatory</td></tr><tr><td>T5: Budget-amendment follow-through</td><td align="center">PENDING</td><td>Watch BP2026/27</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-posture-government-side">Counter-posture (government side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-posture-government-side"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-posture-government-side">Counter-posture (government side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-posture-government-side"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CT-1</strong> — Minister prepares data-backed response citing <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> reductions for young workers and net SME burden change.</li>
 <li><strong>CT-2</strong> — Finance ministry publishes budget-rule line: "no reinstatement compatible with FI framework at current fiscal path".</li>
 <li><strong>CT-3</strong> — KD-specific messaging emphasises SME-growth measures already implemented (for example <em>växa-stöd</em>).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-5">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-5">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — reasoning from a single new document plus 3-week cluster; baseline supported by open parliamentary archive.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10447">HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Document</strong>: HD10447 — <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>Submitter</strong>: Patrik Lundqvist (S), Gävleborg
 <strong>Addressee</strong>: Ebba Busch (KD), energi- och näringsminister
 <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-23 · <strong>SISVA</strong>: 2026-05-07
 <strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447</a> (Admiralty A1)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Lundqvist asks Minister Busch:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>What is the regeringens förklaring to the försämringen för småföretagen which the abolition of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader caused?</li>
 <li>Does the regeringen intend to återinföra stödet eller alternativ stödform riktad specifikt till small business?</li>
 </ol>
 <p>Framing: Sweden's growth gap vs EU, SME employment importance, abolition cost borne specifically by small firms.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-7-dimension">Classification (7-dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-7-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-7-dimension">Classification (7-dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-7-dimension"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-7-dimension">Classification (7-dimension)<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Interpellation</td></tr><tr><td>Partistrategisk nivå</td><td>High (labour-cost wedge)</td></tr><tr><td>Tidshorisont</td><td>Short (SISVA 13 days)</td></tr><tr><td>Koalitionsrisk</td><td>Medium (KD-targeted)</td></tr><tr><td>Väljargrupp</td><td>SME owners, SME employees</td></tr><tr><td>Geografisk räckvidd</td><td>National, with Gävleborg constituency amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Admiralty rating</td><td>A1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighting">DIW weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighting"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighting">DIW weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighting"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1639,39 +1639,39 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighting">DIW weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1-5)</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Contribution</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Decision relevance</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">1.20</td></tr><tr><td>Impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.75</td></tr><tr><td>Weight (institutional)</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.60</td></tr><tr><td>Timeliness</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.60</td></tr><tr><td>Novelty</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">0.20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"><strong>3.35</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Cluster-adjusted: +0.5 for campaign membership → <strong>3.85</strong> (above analysis threshold of 3.0).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-one-pager">SWOT (one-pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-one-pager"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-one-pager">SWOT (one-pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-one-pager"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S</strong>: Concrete policy target, KD-specific addressee, cluster coherence.</li>
 <li><strong>W</strong>: Single signatory, no press tie-in, soft evidence on SME growth-gap causation.</li>
 <li><strong>O</strong>: Pre-election window; KD brand vulnerability; Nordic comparative framing.</li>
 <li><strong>T</strong>: Minister defensive reply (70% likely); fiscal-rule wall; S over-reach if overplayed.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-posture">Risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-posture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-posture">Risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-posture"></a></h3>
 <p>Low procedural risk; medium political risk for KD (brand); low risk for S (downside: narrative fails to land).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated">Stakeholder map (abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated">Stakeholder map (abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Patrik Lundqvist (S)</strong>: Gävleborg MP; prior labour-policy IPs. Motivation: constituency SME service + party alignment.</li>
 <li><strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong>: Must answer personally; brand risk; likely defensive answer.</li>
 <li><strong>Företagarna</strong>: Potential amplifier; brand-aligned with S framing on this issue.</li>
 <li><strong>Finance Minister Svantesson (M)</strong>: Non-addressee but fiscal backstop; may signal through written press.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd">Scenario routing (links to folder-level <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd">Scenario routing (links to folder-level <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S1 Defensive defend — 50% — Busch answer cites växa-stöd / arbetsgivaravgifter</li>
 <li>S2 Partial review — 20% — Tillväxtverket review signalled</li>
 <li>S3 Fiscal-rule wall — 20% — överskottsmål cited</li>
 <li>S4 Coalition drift — 10% — KD-internal movement</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-document-level">Key Judgment (document-level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-document-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-document-level">Key Judgment (document-level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-document-level"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10447 is a credible, well-targeted opposition interpellation functioning as a <strong>narrative-capture instrument</strong>, not a realistic policy-change lever. Expected outcome: narrative gain for S, minor brand cost for KD, no policy change in the 2026–2026 mandate period. <strong>Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-references">Cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">Cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Folder index: <code>../README.md</code></li>
 <li>Cluster context: <code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></li>
 <li>Scenario probabilities: <code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></li>
 <li>Election impact: <code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-source-summary">Source summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-summary">Source summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1705,9 +1705,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-source-summary">Source summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>URL</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdagen dokumentstatus HD10447</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447</a></td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen 2024 budget proposition (abolition)</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a></td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>SCB SME labour-market tables</td><td><a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a></td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster cache</td><td><code>analysis/data/documents/interpellations/*.json</code></td><td>A2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Swedish general election 2026-09-13 — ~20 weeks from analysis date. HD10447 lands mid-pre-campaign window where narrative positioning hardens before summer recess.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-timeline">Pre-campaign timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-campaign-timeline">Pre-campaign timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
   title Pre-campaign window 2026
   2026-04-24 : HD10447 filed · cluster pattern visible
@@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-timeline">Pre-campaign timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="
   2026-06-18 : Riksdagens sommaruppehåll · narrative locked for summer
   2026-08-15 : Pre-election campaign formally opens
   2026-09-13 : Valdag</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop">Polling baseline (April 2026, aggregated Novus + SCB + Demoskop)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop">Polling baseline (April 2026, aggregated Novus + SCB + Demoskop)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1786,16 +1786,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop">Polling
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">2025H2 avg</th><th align="center">2026Q1 avg</th><th align="center">Trend</th><th align="center">2022 result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">31%</td><td align="center">33%</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">30.3%</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">18%</td><td align="center">17%</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">19.1%</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">20%</td><td align="center">21%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">20.5%</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">7%</td><td align="center">7%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">6.8%</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">6.7%</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">5.1%</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">4%</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">5.3%</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">4%</td><td align="center">3%</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">4.6%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Coalition math</strong>: Tidö (M+SD+KD+L) = 45% (down from ~49% at 2022 election). S+MP+V+C = 50%. KD/L sit at or near 4% threshold — existential risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hd10447-impact-vectors">HD10447 impact vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-impact-vectors"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate">Vector 1 — SME-owner cohort (~240k eligible voters; est. 4.1% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hd10447-impact-vectors">HD10447 impact vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-impact-vectors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate">Vector 1 — SME-owner cohort (~240k eligible voters; est. 4.1% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate"></a></h4>
 <p>Most directly targeted by the narrative. 2022 split ~35% KD/M, ~20% S. A 5-percentage-point KD/M→S shift in this cohort = ~12k votes nationally, ~0.2% absolute.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate">Vector 2 — SME employees (~1.2M voters; est. 20% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate">Vector 2 — SME employees (~1.2M voters; est. 20% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate"></a></h4>
 <p>Indirect — narrative of "unstable employer" and "labour-insecurity" plays here. Small but non-zero shift possible; base-rate ~2 pp shifts in similar past wedge campaigns.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt">Vector 3 — Rural Gävleborg / northern industrial belt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt">Vector 3 — Rural Gävleborg / northern industrial belt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt"></a></h4>
 <p>Lundqvist's home base. Visible constituency service amplifies S local brand; marginal seat impact in valkrets Gävleborg (≈5 S mandat, 2 M, 1 SD at current aggregate).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost">Vector 4 — KD brand damage (no new voters; existential cost)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost">Vector 4 — KD brand damage (no new voters; existential cost)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost"></a></h4>
 <p>If KD drops below 4%, entire Tidö coalition math collapses (no cabinet). This makes the marginal cost of HD10447 to KD disproportionately high relative to the marginal benefit to S.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-wedge-axis-assessment">Wedge-axis assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wedge-axis-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wedge-axis-assessment">Wedge-axis assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wedge-axis-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1827,22 +1827,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-wedge-axis-assessment">Wedge-axis assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Strength</th><th>Why</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cost-of-doing-business</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Salient for SME owners and their employees</td></tr><tr><td>Growth-gap (SE vs EU)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Technical; requires narrative amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Welfare / fairness</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>Not the core S frame here — more "competence" angle</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal responsibility</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Counter-frame available to Tidö; risk cuts both ways</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios">Election impact — most-likely case (combining scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios">Election impact — most-likely case (combining scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Weighted expected shift</strong>: S +0.1 to +0.3 pp nationally; KD −0.1 to −0.4 pp. Small in isolation. <strong>Cumulative effect matters</strong>: HD10447 is 1 of an expected 12–15 S wedge IPs this cycle; stacked effect could reach 1.5–2.5 pp.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd">Recommended indicator set (feeds forward-indicators.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd">Recommended indicator set (feeds forward-indicators.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Weekly polling delta Tidö vs red-green bloc</li>
 <li>KD small-business cohort favourability (Företagarna surveys)</li>
 <li>Volume of S labour-policy IPs by week (target: 2–3 per week through June)</li>
 <li>Regeringen press responses mentioning "företagare" / "småföretag"</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-6">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-6">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — polling baseline and cohort math are A2; attribution of individual IP to measurable shift is B3 (base-rate extrapolation).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Frame</strong>: Current Riksdag (2022–2026) 349 seats. Tidö = M + SD + KD + L. Red-green opposition = S + MP + V + C.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04">Current seat distribution (post-2022 val, adjusted through 2026-04)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04">Current seat distribution (post-2022 val, adjusted through 2026-04)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04">Cur
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">68</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">73</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">19</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">16</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Majority</strong>: 175 seats. Tidö: 176 (M 68 + SD 73 + KD 19 + L 16). Opposition: 173 (S 107 + V 24 + C 24 + MP 18) — note C is not in the Tidö agreement but votes case-by-case; excluded from Tidö.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion">Hypothetical vote on a HD10447-derived motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion">Hypothetical vote on a HD10447-derived motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion"></a></h3>
 <p>Assume S files a motion proposing partial reinstatement of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader. Probable vote breakdown:</p>
 
 
@@ -1989,8 +1989,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion">Hypothetical vote on a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th><th align="right">Frånvarande</th><th align="right">Seats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">107</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">107</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">68</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">68</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">73</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">73</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">24</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">24</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">24</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">19</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">19</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">18</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">16</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Summa</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>167</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>176</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>6</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>0</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Outcome: <strong>Avslag</strong> (Tidö 176 vs Opposition 167). Motion fails on coalition discipline alone.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-fissure-scenarios">Fissure scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain">Fissure A — KD defection (2 KD MPs abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-fissure-scenarios">Fissure scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain">Fissure A — KD defection (2 KD MPs abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain">Fissure A — KD defection
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö as whole</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">174</td><td align="right">2</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">167</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td></tr><tr><td>Outcome</td><td align="right"></td><td align="right">Avslag 174 vs 167</td><td align="right">still holds</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Even 2 KD abstentions don't flip the vote. KD brand harm outpaces vote-level impact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja">Fissure B — Full KD breaks (entire KD 19 votes Ja)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja">Fissure B — Full KD breaks (entire KD 19 votes Ja)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja">Fissure B — Full K
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö residual</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">157</td><td align="right">0</td></tr><tr><td>KD + Opp</td><td align="right">186</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td></tr><tr><td>Outcome</td><td align="right"><strong>Bifall 186</strong></td><td align="right"></td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Full KD defection flips the vote but is politically implausible — would trigger coalition collapse before the vote.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters">Fissure C — L defection (L sometimes votes with opposition on SME matters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters">Fissure C — L defection (L sometimes votes with opposition on SME matters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2086,7 +2086,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matte
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö residual</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">160</td><td align="right">0</td></tr><tr><td>L + Opp</td><td align="right">183</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td></tr><tr><td>Outcome</td><td align="right"><strong>Bifall 183</strong></td><td align="right"></td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>L has more history of selective defection than KD; still politically unlikely on a government-wedge issue.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds">Post-2026 projection (if polling holds)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds">Post-2026 projection (if polling holds)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds"></a></h3>
 <p>Applying 2026Q1 polling (S 33%, M 17%, SD 21%, V 7%, C 5%, MP 5%, KD 4%, L 3%) to 349 seats:</p>
 
 
@@ -2145,7 +2145,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds">Post-2026 projection (if polli
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Projected seats</th><th align="right">Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">115</td><td align="right">115</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">74</td><td align="right">74</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">60</td><td align="right">60</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">25</td><td align="right">25</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">18</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">18</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">14</td><td align="right">14 — <strong>threshold risk</strong></td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0 — <strong>below 4% threshold</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Remaining</td><td align="right">25 distributed</td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Post-2026 Tidö</strong> (if L falls below threshold): 148 (M+SD+KD), short of 175 majority. <strong>Red-green bloc</strong>: 176 (S+V+C+MP), majority. HD10447's KD-damage vector matters more for the coalition post-2026 than pre-2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-4">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-4">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-4"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
   subgraph Current2022to2026[Current Riksdag]
     T1[Tidö 176]
@@ -2160,13 +2160,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-4">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style O1 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style T2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style O2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-7">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-7">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH</strong> on current seats (A1 — Valmyndigheten). <strong>MEDIUM</strong> on 2026 projection (B2 — polling aggregates, seat allocation via Sainte-Laguë).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Which voter segments does HD10447 move, and how much?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-segments">Primary segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-segments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-segments">Primary segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-segments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2236,7 +2236,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-segments">Primary segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th align="right">Size (eligible)</th><th>2022 vote split</th><th>Relevance to HD10447</th><th>Est. movement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SME owners (&#x3C; 10 emp)</td><td align="right">~240k</td><td>KD/M 35%, S 20%</td><td>HIGH — directly subsidised pre-2024</td><td>S +3–5 pp in-segment</td></tr><tr><td>SME employees</td><td align="right">~1.2M</td><td>~Swedish avg</td><td>MEDIUM — labour-stability narrative</td><td>S +0.5–1 pp</td></tr><tr><td>Public-sector workers</td><td align="right">~1.5M</td><td>S strongest; less exposed</td><td>LOW — not directly affected</td><td>~0</td></tr><tr><td>Freelance / self-employed</td><td align="right">~320k</td><td>mixed; libertarian-leaning</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM — some overlap with SME cohort</td><td>S +1 pp</td></tr><tr><td>Rural / small-town voters</td><td align="right">~1.8M</td><td>SD strong, S second</td><td>MEDIUM — small-town SMEs dominate local economy</td><td>mixed; S +0.5 pp</td></tr><tr><td>Big-city professionals</td><td align="right">~1.4M</td><td>S, M, MP, V; educated</td><td>LOW — not core narrative audience</td><td>~0</td></tr><tr><td>Soft M voters (centrist)</td><td align="right">~0.6M</td><td>M 2022</td><td>MEDIUM — sensitive to "competence" frame</td><td>M → S, C, MP micro-shifts</td></tr><tr><td>Soft KD voters</td><td align="right">~0.3M</td><td>KD 2022</td><td>HIGH — central to KD brand risk</td><td>KD → L, M, abstain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-receptivity">Narrative receptivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-receptivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-receptivity">Narrative receptivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-receptivity"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title HD10447 narrative reach (size × receptivity)
   x-axis Low receptivity --> High receptivity
@@ -2252,24 +2252,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-receptivity">Narrative receptivity<a class="" aria-hidden="
   "Rural voters": [0.45, 0.85]
   "Big-city professionals": [0.15, 0.78]
   "Public-sector workers": [0.10, 0.88]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-movement-model-weighted">Movement model (weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-movement-model-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-movement-model-weighted">Movement model (weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-movement-model-weighted"></a></h3>
 <p>Expected net S gain from HD10447 = Σ(segment size × movement prob) / electorate ≈ <strong>+0.1–0.3 pp nationally</strong>. Expected KD loss ≈ <strong>−0.1–0.4 pp</strong>. See <code>election-2026-analysis.md</code> for stacking effect across the full S IP campaign.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking">High-information segments for tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking">High-information segments for tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Soft KD voters</strong> — KD brand-damage canary; watch Företagarna panels.</li>
 <li><strong>SME owners</strong> — direct narrative target; watch Svenskt Näringsliv surveys.</li>
 <li><strong>Rural Gävleborg</strong> — constituency amplification; watch local press coverage.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-source-rating">Source rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-rating"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-rating">Source rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-rating"></a></h3>
 <p>Segment sizes from SCB 2025 labour-market tables (A1). 2022 vote splits from Valmyndigheten (A1). Movement projections from cluster base-rate modelling (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-8">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-8">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — segment sizes A1; projected shifts B2 (extrapolated from prior wedge-campaign analogs).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: How comparable jurisdictions treat SME high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement. <strong>Method</strong>: Outside-In comparator analysis per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a>.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany, EU baseline (Nordic + EU minimum).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2325,13 +2325,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Equivalent scheme</th><th>Current status</th><th>Employer cost share</th><th>Primary source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden (baseline)</strong></td><td>Ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader (2016–2024)</td><td>Abolished 2024</td><td>Employer bears full sick-pay cost weeks 1–2</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Sygedagpengerefusion (ongoing)</td><td>In force — employer reimbursed from day 31 (or from day 1 under § 56 agreement for chronically ill workers)</td><td>Employer bears weeks 1–4</td><td><a href="https://www.borger.dk/">https://www.borger.dk/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Sairauspäiväraha (Kela)</td><td>Kela compensates from day 10 onward; SME burden weeks 1–2</td><td>Employer weeks 1–2 only</td><td><a href="https://www.kela.fi/">https://www.kela.fi/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Sykepenger (NAV)</td><td>Employer pays first 16 days, state pays from day 17 — much shorter employer burden than SE</td><td>Employer 16 days</td><td><a href="https://www.nav.no/">https://www.nav.no/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Entgeltfortzahlung + Umlageverfahren U1 (EFZG)</td><td>Mandatory pooling scheme for small firms (&#x3C; 30 employees); state covers up to 80%</td><td>Employer 6 weeks, but U1 pools the SME burden</td><td><a href="https://www.bmas.de/">https://www.bmas.de/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU average</strong></td><td>Varies</td><td>~7/27 member states operate explicit SME reimbursement; another ~8 have shorter employer windows</td><td>Mixed</td><td>EU-OSHA 2024 report (A1)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-findings">Key findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings">Key findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Sweden post-2024 is the Nordic outlier.</strong> All three Nordic comparators maintain an explicit mechanism to shorten or pool SME sick-pay exposure. Denmark, Finland, Norway all cap employer burden in weeks, not month. After 2024, Sweden effectively extends employer-borne cost beyond the Nordic norm.</li>
 <li><strong>Germany's U1 Umlageverfahren</strong> offers a design precedent often cited by Företagarna: mandatory small-firm pooling, 60–80% reimbursement, funded by employer levy. Relevant to HD10447 because it is a "reinstate with a twist" option.</li>
 <li><strong>EU policy trajectory</strong> (European Semester 2025) flags employer sick-pay burden as an SME-productivity factor for several member states — Sweden not yet on that list, but the HD10447 narrative could raise its profile.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447">Lessons applicable to HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447">Lessons applicable to HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447">Lessons applicable to HD10447<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lesson</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Nordic Scandinavia maintains some form of SME buffer</td><td>S can frame Sweden as "Nordic outlier"</td></tr><tr><td>German U1 pooling is a revenue-neutral design</td><td>KD/M could propose pooling rather than reinstatement</td></tr><tr><td>Short employer windows (Norway 16 days) are politically stable across left/right governments</td><td>Political risk of abolition is asymmetric — hard to re-establish once removed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-5">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-5">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-5"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
   SE[Sweden&#x3C;br/>no SME reimbursement&#x3C;br/>post-2024]
   DK[Denmark&#x3C;br/>refusion from day 31]
@@ -2372,46 +2372,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-5">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style NO fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style DE fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style EU fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-9">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-9">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-9"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH (A1–A2)</strong> — comparator statutes and scheme designs are matter of open public law.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: What past episodes most closely resemble HD10447 + cluster, and what did they predict?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election">Parallel 1 — 2021-22 S wedge campaign on pensioners' tax (pre-2022 election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election">Parallel 1 — 2021-22 S wedge campaign on pensioners' tax (pre-2022 election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election"></a></h3>
 <p>S coordinated 9 interpellations on pensioners' skatt Jan–May 2022, addressing Finance Minister Damberg and PM Andersson. Pattern: single-signatory, topic-clustered, pre-election. Led to a budget concession on the sänkta skatten för pensionärer.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Direct procedural analog.</li>
 <li><strong>Outcome</strong>: Coalition held; opposition captured narrative; concession made 2 months before election.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: High for narrative-capture, medium for concession (Tidö has less vote slack than the 2021 minority government).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik">Parallel 2 — 2018-19 M campaign on energipolitik<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik">Parallel 2 — 2018-19 M campaign on energipolitik<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik"></a></h3>
 <p>M filed 11 IPs Feb–Jun 2018 on energipolitik ahead of 2018 val, addressing then-minister Baylan (S). Produced narrative traction but no policy change; contributed to 2018 close result.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Same signalling mechanism; opposition party used IPs as narrative tool not legislation tool.</li>
 <li><strong>Outcome</strong>: Narrative win, no policy move.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: Medium — Tidö likely follows Löfven-government pattern of holding line.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested">Parallel 3 — 2024 abolition itself (the policy being contested)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested">Parallel 3 — 2024 abolition itself (the policy being contested)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested"></a></h3>
 <p>The ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader was abolished in the 2024 budget proposition. Tidö argued the scheme was administratively costly relative to its reach. Opposition IPs on the abolition were filed in 2024 Q4 but narrative did not cohere then.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Same actors, same policy, but narrative now being re-activated 18 months later with pre-election framing.</li>
 <li><strong>Outcome then</strong>: Minimal political cost to Tidö.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive implication</strong>: Re-activation with election context materially changes the risk profile.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster">Parallel 4 — 2014 FP (now L) small-business motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster">Parallel 4 — 2014 FP (now L) small-business motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p>Pre-2014 election, FP filed a cluster of motions/IPs on small-business cost pressures. Policy effect near-zero; narrative effect moderate; FP lost ground anyway.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Opposite ideological direction but similar tactic.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: Narrative alone is not sufficient — must be tied to a broader economic frame.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996">Parallel 5 — German Entgeltfortzahlung debate (1996)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996">Parallel 5 — German Entgeltfortzahlung debate (1996)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996"></a></h3>
 <p>Germany's Kohl government cut sick-pay continuation from 100% to 80% in 1996 — faced mass opposition, partly reversed 1999 after Rot-Grün won. Shows the long shadow of sick-pay policy cuts on a ruling coalition.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Different jurisdiction; same political physics (sick-pay cuts as durable wedge).</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: Medium-long-term — cuts of this type tend to return as election issues for many cycles.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
   P1[2021-22 Pensionärsskatt] -->|narrative+concession| PRES[HD10447 outlook]
   P2[2018-19 Energipolitik] -->|narrative only| PRES
@@ -2424,25 +2424,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
   style P3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style P4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style P5 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-net-historical-signal">Net historical signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-historical-signal"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-net-historical-signal">Net historical signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-historical-signal"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative capture is achievable and consistent across all 5 parallels (high prior).</li>
 <li>Concession is conditional on coalition vote-slack — Tidö has <strong>less</strong> slack than the 2022 Andersson government had → <strong>lower</strong> concession probability.</li>
 <li>Wedge-issue durability across cycles (Parallel 5) argues against treating HD10447 as a one-off.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-10">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-10">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> — parallels 1–3 are directly analogous with well-documented A2 sourcing; parallel 5 is international and loosely analogous.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: How feasible is partial or full reinstatement of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader, if a future government chose to do so?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-administrative-readiness">Administrative readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-readiness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-administrative-readiness">Administrative readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-readiness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Legacy system</strong>: Försäkringskassan administered the scheme 2016–2024. Infrastructure de-commissioned but <strong>not fully dismantled</strong>; code paths and reporting schemas are archived. Reactivation estimate: 6–9 months from political decision to operational payout.</li>
 <li><strong>Data flows</strong>: Arbetsgivardeklaration på individnivå (AGI) already reports sick-pay data monthly; the scheme's threshold check is a database query, not a new data collection.</li>
 <li><strong>Complexity</strong>: LOW — scheme was revenue-checked not behaviour-checked.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-fiscal-readiness">Fiscal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-readiness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fiscal-readiness">Fiscal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-readiness"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2470,13 +2470,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-fiscal-readiness">Fiscal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Design</th><th align="right">Annual cost estimate (2024 SEK)</th><th>Commentary</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Full 2016–2024 design</td><td align="right">~1.7 Mdkr</td><td>Abolished for this reason (budget 2024 motivation)</td></tr><tr><td>Threshold raised (applies only to firms &#x3C; 10 emp)</td><td align="right">~0.9 Mdkr</td><td>Likely "partial review" Scenario 2 output</td></tr><tr><td>Pooling levy (German U1 style)</td><td align="right">~0.4 Mdkr net</td><td>Revenue-neutral at mid-term; administrative cost ~0.1 Mdkr</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Tidö fiscal space in 2025 is tight (overskottsmål under pressure); partial or pooling designs more credible than full reinstatement.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-legal-readiness">Legal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-readiness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legal-readiness">Legal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-readiness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Statutory vehicle</strong>: Socialförsäkringsbalken 24 kap. — minor amendment required to reinstate § on reimbursement. Well-understood drafting.</li>
 <li><strong>EU state-aid</strong>: the original scheme was de-minimis-compatible; reinstatement similarly unproblematic under EU 2023/2831.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination with arbetsgivaravgifter</strong>: requires parallel change to SFB 24 kap. to avoid double-compensation.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-political-feasibility-path">Political feasibility path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-feasibility-path"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-feasibility-path">Political feasibility path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-feasibility-path"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   IP[HD10447 IP] --> ANS[2026-05-07 answer]
   ANS -->|status quo| END1[No change]
@@ -2490,7 +2490,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-feasibility-path">Political feasibility path<a class="" ari
   style LAW fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
   style END1 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style END2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-summary-table">Feasibility summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-summary-table">Feasibility summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2532,31 +2532,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-summary-table">Feasibility summary table<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1-5)</th><th>Commentary</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Administrative</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Legacy scheme; rapid reactivation possible</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal</td><td align="center">2–3</td><td>Tight fiscal space; partial or pooling preferred</td></tr><tr><td>Legal</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Straightforward statutory amendment</td></tr><tr><td>Political (Tidö)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Very unlikely to choose reinstatement</td></tr><tr><td>Political (red-green)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Likely to include in 2026 manifesto</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall (post-2026 red-green)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>3.5</strong></td><td>Feasible with partial or pooling design</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-of-botched-implementation">Risk of botched implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-of-botched-implementation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-of-botched-implementation">Risk of botched implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-of-botched-implementation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If reinstated hurriedly post-2026 election without clarified thresholds, could cause administrative flux and temporary under-payment of legitimate claims.</li>
 <li>Mitigation: 6-month transition window with legacy parameters.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-11">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-11">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-11"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> — administrative and legal feasibility A1–A2; political feasibility B2 (based on polling and manifesto signalling).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Challenge the lead framing via ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses). <strong>Reference</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a> §Red-team.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign">Hypothesis H1 — Coordinated pre-election campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign">Hypothesis H1 — Coordinated pre-election campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10447 is part of a deliberate, centrally-coordinated S campaign to build an SME-cost wedge ahead of the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting</strong>: 12/16 S-filed IPs in 3 weeks; topic clustering; explicit growth-gap framing; single-signer pattern mirrors prior coordinated IP campaigns.</p>
 <p><strong>Contradicting</strong>: No public press tie-in yet; single signatory (not co-signed across S front-bench); no parallel S press release.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing">Hypothesis H2 — Constituency-driven individual filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing">Hypothesis H2 — Constituency-driven individual filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10447 is a constituency-driven individual filing by Lundqvist responding to SME owners in Gävleborg, not a party campaign. The cluster pattern is coincidence plus opposition baseline.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting</strong>: Lundqvist has prior SME-labour IPs; no press tie-in; single signer; the "cluster" is plausibly the normal end-of-session S activity peak.</p>
 <p><strong>Contradicting</strong>: Topic density in the cluster (4 labour-policy IPs in 3 weeks) is 4× baseline; similar patterns preceded 2022 and 2018 S campaigns.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture">Hypothesis H3 — Signalling to internal Tidö fracture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture">Hypothesis H3 — Signalling to internal Tidö fracture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10447 is primarily aimed not at Tidö as a whole but at exploiting a latent M-KD tension on SME burden. The KD-specific addressee is the signal.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting</strong>: Busch addressed personally (not Svantesson, whose portfolio includes fiscal cost); KD's "<em>företagens parti</em>" branding is most vulnerable; Företagarna lobby alignment.</p>
 <p><strong>Contradicting</strong>: Energy/Industry ministry is the conventional addressee for SME matters regardless of party — the addressee choice is structural, not tactical.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2624,13 +2624,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">H1 (campaign)</th><th align="center">H2 (constituency)</th><th align="center">H3 (KD-fracture)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12/16 S-filed IPs in 3 weeks</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Single signatory</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Topic clustering across 4 clusters</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>KD-specific addressee</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">++</td></tr><tr><td>No press tie-in (yet)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Growth-gap framing (EU comparative)</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Lundqvist's prior IP portfolio</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Election 5 months out</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Net support</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+7</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+1</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Legend: <code>++</code> strong supporting · <code>+</code> weak supporting · <code>0</code> neutral · <code>−</code> contradicting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-1">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-1">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-1"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>H1 Coordinated campaign</strong> — strongest fit (net +7). Adopted as working hypothesis.</li>
 <li><strong>H3 KD-fracture signalling</strong> — secondary, consistent with H1 (not mutually exclusive).</li>
 <li><strong>H2 Constituency-driven</strong> — weakest fit; useful as null hypothesis.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Challenge A</strong>: If this were a coordinated campaign we would expect co-signers. Why none?
 <ul>
@@ -2648,18 +2648,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected--logged-alternatives">Rejected / logged alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected--logged-alternatives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected--logged-alternatives">Rejected / logged alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected--logged-alternatives"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Policy-wonk filing</strong> (Lundqvist raising a wonkish issue irrespective of campaign) — rejected: text framing is overtly political (Sweden-EU growth gap, "den här regeringen").</li>
 <li><strong>Intra-S factional signalling</strong> (left-S pushing economic-populist agenda over centrist) — logged but not supported by current evidence.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-on-outcome">Confidence on outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-on-outcome"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-on-outcome">Confidence on outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-on-outcome"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> that H1 is the dominant hypothesis. Reassess after 2026-05-06 if no press coordination emerges (then shift weight toward H2/H3).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: 7-dimension political-classification per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md"><code>political-classification-guide.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader">HD10447 — Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader">HD10447 — Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2706,14 +2706,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Document type</td><td>Interpellation (IP)</td><td><code>typ=ip</code> in HD10447 metadata (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>2. Policy domain</td><td>Labour market / SME fiscal policy</td><td>Text references <em>sjuklönekostnader</em>, <em>små och medelstora företag</em>, <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>3. Political orientation</td><td>Opposition (S) → Government (KD)</td><td>Undertecknare: Patrik Lundqvist (S); ställd till Ebba Busch (KD) (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>4. Conflict intensity</td><td>Medium — reopens a 2024 decision; frames Sweden-vs-EU growth gap</td><td>Text explicitly attributes growth underperformance to the policy (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>5. Urgency</td><td>Routine — SISVA (answer deadline) 2026-05-07</td><td><code>SISVA: 2026-05-07</code> in workflow status (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>6. Public interest</td><td>High — affects ~1.2M SMEs, ~60% of private-sector employment</td><td>SCB företagsstatistik 2024 (A2) <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>7. Election relevance</td><td>High — wedge-ready, 5 months before Sep 2026</td><td>Direct cite of Sweden-vs-EU growth comparison is an electoral-narrative frame (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier">Priority tier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier">Priority tier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>L2+ Priority</strong> — one tier above default L2 Strategic because:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Reopens a closed 2024 budget decision with quantifiable fiscal footprint (~SEK 1.0–1.5 bn/year).</li>
 <li>Cabinet-level minister personally exposed.</li>
 <li>Pre-election wedge posture.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2740,7 +2740,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Attribute</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Classification</td><td>Public (primary source is data.riksdagen.se, open data)</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9 special category for <em>political opinion</em> — lawful basis 9(2)(e) publicly made; 9(2)(g) substantial public interest</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Keep indefinitely in <code>analysis/daily/</code>; primary source URL is permanent</td></tr><tr><td>Access</td><td>Analysts + public via news pipeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window">Cluster classifications (HD10428–HD10447 window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window">Cluster classifications (HD10428–HD10447 window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2789,7 +2789,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window">Cluster classification
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Items</th><th>Domain</th><th>Intensity</th><th>Election relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SME-cost economics</td><td>HD10444, HD10447</td><td>Fiscal / labour market</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Labour / social protection</td><td>HD10443, HD10440, HD10446</td><td>Labour, civil</td><td>Low–Med</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Security / policing</td><td>HD10439, HD10430, HD10429, HD10441</td><td>Internal security, rule-of-law</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare</td><td>HD10432, HD10434, HD10442</td><td>Health, regional</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign / diaspora</td><td>HD10435, HD10431</td><td>Foreign, rights</td><td>Low</td><td>Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-6">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-6">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-6"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   HD10447[HD10447&#x3C;br/>S → KD&#x3C;br/>L2+ Priority]
   HD10447 --> D1[Domain&#x3C;br/>Labour / SME fiscal]
@@ -2801,7 +2801,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-6">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style D2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style D3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style D4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2, primary)</li>
 <li>SCB företagsstatistik: <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a> (A2)</li>
@@ -2809,10 +2809,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Map HD10447 to adjacent policy clusters, legislative chains, and coordinated-activity patterns.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster">SME-cost economics cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster">SME-cost economics cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2840,7 +2840,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster">SME-cost economics cluster<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10447</td><td>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</td><td>S Lundqvist</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-labour--social-protection-cluster">Labour / social-protection cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-labour--social-protection-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-labour--social-protection-cluster">Labour / social-protection cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-labour--social-protection-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-labour--social-protection-cluster">Labour / social-protection cluster
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-security--policing-cluster">Security / policing cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security--policing-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-security--policing-cluster">Security / policing cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security--policing-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2920,7 +2920,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-security--policing-cluster">Security / policing cluster<a class="" ar
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td>Moskéer som sprider hat och hot</td><td>SD</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>Skyddet för yttrandefriheten prop 2025/26:133</td><td>SD</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-healthcare--regional-cluster">Healthcare / regional cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-healthcare--regional-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-healthcare--regional-cluster">Healthcare / regional cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-healthcare--regional-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-healthcare--regional-cluster">Healthcare / regional cluster<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Ätstörningsvården Region Stockholm</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>Statligt säkerställande vårdbyggnader</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>Bostadsbyggandet Stockholmsregionen</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-hd10447">Legislative chain (HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chain-hd10447">Legislative chain (HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-hd10447"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   BP2024[Budget Bill 2023/24&#x3C;br/>abolition of reimbursement] --> EFFECT[Policy in force&#x3C;br/>from 2024-01-01]
   EFFECT --> CRITIQUE[Industry + union&#x3C;br/>concerns 2024-25]
@@ -2963,7 +2963,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-hd10447">Legislative chain (HD10447)<a class="" ari
   style HD10447 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style ANSWER fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style EL fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-pattern">Coordinated-activity pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-pattern">Coordinated-activity pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-pattern"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3000,12 +3000,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-pattern">Coordinated-activity pattern<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Observation</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S IP volume in HD10428–HD10447 window</td><td><strong>12 of 16</strong> (75%)</td><td>Batch query to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">https://data.riksdagen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>Period</td><td>3 weeks (2026-04-02 → 2026-04-23)</td><td>dok_ids</td></tr><tr><td>Topic diversity</td><td>4 distinct clusters (SME cost, labour, security, healthcare)</td><td>See above</td></tr><tr><td>Baseline (2025/26 session)</td><td>S files ~3 IPs/week on average</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">https://data.riksdagen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>Campaign index</td><td>4× baseline in cluster weeks</td><td>Ratio calc</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Propositions folder <code>2026-04-24/propositions/</code> — cross-check for any SME-cost government proposition.</li>
 <li>Budget artefacts — historical reimbursement programme references in <code>analysis/worldbank/</code> and <code>analysis/imf/</code> economic context.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated">External-source references (Admiralty annotated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated">External-source references (Admiralty annotated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3054,9 +3054,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated">External-source refer
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th align="center">Grade</th><th>Use</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>data.riksdagen.se (HD10447 + siblings)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Primary document content &#x26; metadata</td></tr><tr><td>regeringen.se (2024 BP, impact assessment)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Fiscal footprint</td></tr><tr><td>scb.se (företagsstatistik, arbetsmarknad)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>SME count, employment share</td></tr><tr><td>tillvaxtverket.se (rapport 2023:8)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Programme evaluation</td></tr><tr><td>forsakringskassan.se (årsredovisning 2024)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Administration volume</td></tr><tr><td>oecd.org (Sweden 2023 survey)</td><td align="center">A1</td><td>International benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td>svensktnaringsliv.se / foretagarna.se</td><td align="center">B2</td><td>Industry advocacy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Audit the analytical process itself against ICD 203 and OSINT tradecraft canon; log what worked, what didn't, and concrete improvements.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3113,9 +3113,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 standard</th><th>How addressed</th><th>Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Objectivity</td><td>Neutral treatment of S, KD, M, Tidö throughout; devils-advocate.md explicitly scored competing hypotheses</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>2. Independence of political considerations</td><td>No partisan framing; each actor's stance recorded per their stated position</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>3. Timeliness</td><td>Analysis completed within 30 min of agent start; SISVA (2026-05-07) clearly marked</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>4. Sources of all key information</td><td>Per-claim <code>dok_id</code> / URL citations on every ranked row and evidence table</td><td>Some A3 press sources projected for Pass 2 follow-up</td></tr><tr><td>5. Uncertainty</td><td>Confidence labels (VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM-HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW-MEDIUM / LOW) on every Key Judgment; probabilities on scenarios</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>6. Distinguishing intel from assumptions</td><td>Scenario and ACH explicitly separate observed evidence from inference</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>7. Relevance to consumers</td><td>BLUF + 3 Decisions + PIR mapping tied to executive brief</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>8. Logical argumentation</td><td>ACH matrix with explicit net-support scoring; transparent scenario probabilities</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>9. Consistency</td><td>Cross-reference map aligns synthesis, threat, SWOT, risk, scenario, intel-assessment</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-code-usage">Admiralty Code usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-usage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-code-usage">Admiralty Code usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-usage"></a></h3>
 <p>Evidence rated A1–F6 throughout. Primary sources (Riksdagen, Regeringen, Kela, NAV) rated A1–A2. Base-rate extrapolations rated B2–B3. No source below C3 used in Key Judgments.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Key Assumptions Check (scenario-analysis.md)</li>
 <li>ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (devils-advocate.md)</li>
@@ -3128,25 +3128,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Technique
 <li>What-If / leading-indicator bait (forward-indicators.md)</li>
 <li>Red-team challenge (devils-advocate.md challenges A–C)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-wep--kent-scale-usage">WEP / Kent Scale usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wep--kent-scale-usage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wep--kent-scale-usage">WEP / Kent Scale usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wep--kent-scale-usage"></a></h3>
 <p>Probabilities expressed both as percentages (50 / 20 / 20 / 10) and anchored to WEP bands:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>50% → <em>Even chance</em> / <em>Sannolikt</em></li>
 <li>20% → <em>Unlikely</em> / <em>Osannolikt</em></li>
 <li>10% → <em>Very unlikely</em> / <em>Mycket osannolikt</em></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-what-worked">What worked<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked">What worked<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Batched heredoc writing kept the 30-min PR deadline feasible.</li>
 <li>Using the 29-IP cluster as cluster-context allowed strong H1 framing without over-claiming on a single doc.</li>
 <li>Pre-flight check correctly routed to Analysis mode.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Initial threat-analysis.md heredoc triggered sandbox block on word "kill-chain"; had to rewrite (cost ~60 s).</li>
 <li>Only one date-filtered document for 2026-04-24 required lookback to 2026-04-23 and wider cluster context — acceptable but reduces narrative variety.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Avoid sandbox hot-words</strong>: add a pre-check for banned strings (<code>kill-chain</code>, etc.) before heredoc write.</li>
 <li><strong>Parallelise Family D</strong>: batch 7 Family D files into one multi-heredoc bash call once cluster data is confirmed stable.</li>
@@ -3154,7 +3154,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for
 <li><strong>Earlier Pass 1 snapshot</strong>: snapshot at the 8-file mark rather than 22-file mark to reduce end-of-run risk if deadline approaches.</li>
 <li><strong>Press-source watch list</strong>: add a standing A3-quality comparator to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> so the 2026-05-07 answer auto-triggers a follow-up workflow.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-osint-ethics-check">OSINT ethics check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-osint-ethics-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-osint-ethics-check">OSINT ethics check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-osint-ethics-check"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Only public sources (Riksdagen open data, Regeringen.se, public comparator government data).</li>
 <li>No personal data beyond what MPs and ministers publish in their official capacity (GDPR Art. 9 lawful basis 9(2)(e)).</li>
@@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-osint-ethics-check">OSINT ethics check<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-24 01:36 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 30
@@ -3177,7 +3177,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -3187,9 +3187,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <h2 id="rm-all-documents-sourced-from-official-riksdag-regering-mcp-apidata-sourced-from-2026-04-23-via-lookback-fallback--check-freshness-indicators">All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-23 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-documents-sourced-from-official-riksdag-regering-mcp-apidata-sourced-from-2026-04-23-via-lookback-fallback--check-freshness-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3235,7 +3262,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:11.960Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:33.527Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html b/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html
index 50dedb16de..12cc653c5c 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Interpellation Debates">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.128Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.677Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.128Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.677Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Debates","description":"A single new interpellation (HD10447, S) was announced today, forcing Energy- och näringsminister Ebba Busch (KD) to defend the 2024 abolition of the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement by 2026-05-07.","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:12.128Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Interpellation Debates","description":"A single new interpellation (HD10447, S) was announced today, forcing Energy- och näringsminister Ebba Busch (KD) to defend the 2024 abolition of the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement by 2026-05-07.","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:33.677Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-interpellations-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10447-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,25 +216,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>A single new interpellation (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">HD10447</a>, S) was announced today, forcing Energy- och näringsminister <strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong> to defend the 2024 abolition of the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement by <strong>2026-05-07</strong>. The item is low in legislative velocity but strategically significant because it reopens the SME-growth narrative four months before the September 2026 election. Confidence MEDIUM — single-source day with rich policy history (<code>A2</code> Admiralty).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial</strong>: Should today's political-intelligence lede lead with HD10447 or cluster it as part of the week's S-interpellation campaign pattern (HD10428–HD10447, 16 items in 3 weeks, 12 of them S)? <em>Recommendation: cluster-frame with HD10447 as anchor</em> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: Should we escalate the sick-pay-cost reimbursement to the <strong>election-2026</strong> watchlist as a defined SME-economics wedge? <em>Recommendation: yes, tier-2 indicator</em> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Editorial calendar</strong>: Should we pre-schedule a follow-up piece for the <strong>2026-05-07</strong> ministerial response window? <em>Recommendation: yes, lock 05-07/05-08 window</em> — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a> trigger IT-1.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm--60-second-read">📌 60-second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">📌 60-second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>What happened</strong> — Patrik Lundqvist (S) filed an interpellation asking whether Minister Busch (KD) will review the effects on SMEs of abolishing the high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement (in force 2016–2024). <code>dok_id: HD10447</code> <code>A2</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Why it matters</strong> — Frames the Kristersson government's 2024 SME-cost decision as a growth drag vs Europe; Sweden's underperformance vs EU average since 2023 is embedded in the text. Economic wedge, pre-election.</li>
 <li><strong>Who's on the hook</strong> — Minister Busch (KD) must respond by <strong>2026-05-07</strong>; pressure also implicates Finance Minister Svantesson (M) on fiscal trade-offs.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order signal</strong> — S has filed <strong>12 of 16</strong> interpellations in the HD10428–HD10447 window (75%); SD 2, C 1, independent 1. Pattern: opposition stress-testing the government's economic record.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">🔮 Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>IT-1 · 2026-05-07</strong> — Minister Busch's written answer. If the minister declines to re-examine the policy, expect S to escalate via a subsequent motion or budget amendment in the 2026/27 budget round (autumn).</p>
-<h2 id="rm--visual--significance-snapshot">📊 Visual — Significance snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--visual--significance-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual--significance-snapshot">📊 Visual — Significance snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual--significance-snapshot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Interpellation significance (DIW × electoral-horizon impact)
     x-axis "Low legislative velocity" --> "High legislative velocity"
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--visual--significance-snapshot">📊 Visual — Significance snapshot
     "HD10444 arb.giv.avg": [0.28, 0.55]
     "HD10443 social dumping": [0.26, 0.48]
     "HD10439 police shortage": [0.22, 0.62]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--companion-files"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-companion-files"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a> — integrated picture</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a> — Key Judgments + PIRs</li>
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ <h2 id="rm--companion-files">🔗 Companion files<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a> — dated triggers</li>
 <li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a> — 5-dimension register</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm--sources">📜 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">📜 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2)</li>
 <li>SCB labour-market tables (referenced for SME cost context): <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a> (A2)</li>
@@ -263,10 +263,10 @@ <h2 id="rm--sources">📜 Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h3>
 <p>The single new interpellation announced in chamber today — <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html"><code>HD10447</code></a> <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em> (Patrik Lundqvist, S → Energi- och näringsminister Ebba Busch, KD) — should be framed as the <strong>anchor of a three-week S-opposition interpellation campaign</strong> on SME-cost and labour-market issues rather than a standalone procedural filing. Evidence: 12 of 16 interpellations in the HD10428–HD10447 window (75%) are S-filed; at least 4 (HD10443 social dumping, HD10444 <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> loopholes, HD10446 false death declarations, HD10447 sick-pay) target labour/social-protection policy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -314,14 +314,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th><code>dok_id</code></th><th>Title</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><code>HD10447</code></td><td>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</td><td align="center"><strong>0.62</strong></td><td>05-07 (answer), Sep 2026 (election)</td><td>Today's only new IP; reopens 2024 budget decision; economic wedge; cites Sweden-vs-EU growth gap</td></tr><tr><td align="center">—</td><td><code>HD10444</code></td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td>2026-05</td><td>Complementary SME-cost IP (S, 2026-04-22) — same analytical cluster</td></tr><tr><td align="center">—</td><td><code>HD10443</code></td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td align="center">0.48</td><td>2026-05</td><td>Labour cluster (S, 2026-04-22)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">—</td><td><code>HD10439</code></td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td align="center">0.62</td><td>2026-05</td><td>Separate security-salience cluster (S, 2026-04-20)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>DIW inputs: document-type weight (interpellation = 0.4 base) × ministerial-seniority weight (Energy/Industry = high for SME issues, 1.4) × electoral-horizon multiplier (1.1 for SME economics) × stakeholder-concentration factor (1.0).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Opposition strategy</strong> — S is using the interpellation tool (low legislative cost, public chamber answer) to force televised ministerial accountability on <strong>SME cost structure</strong> in the five-month window before the September 2026 election. The HD10447 text explicitly frames Sweden's post-2023 underperformance vs EU growth as partly attributable to the government's removal of the sick-pay reimbursement.</li>
 <li><strong>Minister exposure</strong> — Ebba Busch (KD), as Energy- och näringsminister, personally owns both the SME narrative and (via the 2024 budget decision) the removal of the reimbursement. Answering on 2026-05-07 she will be forced to either defend the 2024 decision, promise a review, or signal no change. All three answers have electoral costs.</li>
 <li><strong>Structural context</strong> — Small-business sick-pay burden has been studied by Tillväxtverket and Svenskt Näringsliv for two decades. The 2016–2024 <em>ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader</em> was the main state-borne mitigation. Abolishing it shifted ~SEK 1–1.5 bn/year of risk onto employers (baseline estimate, 2023 budget bill impact assessment).</li>
 <li><strong>Pattern signal</strong> — Interpellation volume from S is rising: 12 in 3 weeks is above the 2025/26 session average (~3/week from S). This is consistent with a pre-summer accountability push targeting the autumn budget debate.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-article-framing">Recommended article framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-article-framing"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-article-framing">Recommended article framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-article-framing"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Lede</strong>: HD10447 as anchor + cluster-level take on the S economic campaign.</li>
 <li><strong>Nut graf</strong>: Why the 2024 reimbursement removal is back on the agenda now.</li>
@@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-recommended-article-framing">Recommended article framing<a class="" a
 <li><strong>Section 3</strong>: Broader interpellation pattern (HD10428–HD10447) — 12/16 S-filed, showing opposition's use of the tool.</li>
 <li><strong>Section 4</strong>: Election-2026 linkage — SME-cost wedge as one of five emerging S campaign themes.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Headline</strong> (EN, 68 chars): "Opposition reopens Sweden's sick-pay reimbursement fight ahead of 2026"</li>
 <li><strong>Headline</strong> (SV, 76 chars): "Oppositionen återöppnar striden om ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader"</li>
 <li><strong>Meta description</strong> (EN, 156 chars): "Socialdemokraten Patrik Lundqvist has filed interpellation HD10447, pressing Minister Ebba Busch (KD) to review the 2024 abolition of SME sick-pay aid."</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-visual">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
   S[S opposition&#x3C;br/>12 IPs in 3 weeks]
   S --> C1[SME-cost cluster&#x3C;br/>HD10444 HD10447]
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
   style C3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style C4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style E fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD10447 full text: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2)</li>
 <li>HD10428–HD10447 interpellation set: <code>get_interpellationer</code> batch, 2026-04-24 (A2)</li>
@@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Standing PIRs addressed</strong>: PIR-2 (legislative activity), PIR-3 (opposition coordination), PIR-5 (pre-election narrative formation), PIR-6 (coalition fissures).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high">Key Judgment 1 — Coordinated S campaign (Confidence: <strong>HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high">Key Judgment 1 — Coordinated S campaign (Confidence: <strong>HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high"></a></h3>
 <p>S is waging a pre-budget and pre-election coordinated interpellation campaign on SME / labour-cost policy, of which HD10447 is the fourth labour-policy filing in three weeks. <em>[Source: internal cluster HD10428–HD10447 · Admiralty A2 · cluster count 12/16 S-filed]</em></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: cluster density, topic coherence, similar pattern observable in 2018 and 2022 pre-election windows.</li>
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-1--coordinated-s-campaign-confidence-high">Key Judgment
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Low — judgment holds even if HD10447 alone were isolated; the cluster is independently attested.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-3 (opposition coordination), PIR-5.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high">Key Judgment 2 — Minister likely to defend (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high">Key Judgment 2 — Minister likely to defend (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister Busch is most likely (50% + 20% = 70%) to respond with either a full defence (Scenario 1) or a partial-review offer (Scenario 2) on 2026-05-07, not a reinstatement signal. <em>[Source: 2022–2025 Tidö IP answers pattern · A2]</em></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: Tidö ministers have answered 87% of reopened-budget IPs with a defensive or status-quo frame (<code>analysis/data/</code> — observed base-rate on 164 such answers).</li>
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-2--minister-likely-to-defend-confidence-medium-high">Key
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Medium — a surprise review offer would flip S's rhetorical payoff.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-2, PIR-5.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium">Key Judgment 3 — KD brand vulnerability (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium">Key Judgment 3 — KD brand vulnerability (Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium"></a></h3>
 <p>KD carries asymmetric political risk from HD10447: its "<em>företagens parti</em>" self-branding is tested by a policy its minister implemented. A visible misstep — even absent coalition fracture — hands S a lasting rhetorical asset. <em>[Source: 2022 KD manifesto + 2024 abolition timeline · A2]</em></p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: KD polling in small-business cohort declined from 2024H1 to 2025H2 (Företagarna brand surveys); HD10447 is a targeted probe.</li>
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-3--kd-brand-vulnerability-confidence-medium">Key Judgmen
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: High — depends on whether press picks up the story.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-5, PIR-6.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium">Key Judgment 4 — Narrow policy-surprise window (Confidence: <strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium">Key Judgment 4 — Narrow policy-surprise window (Confidence: <strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium"></a></h3>
 <p>There is a narrow (10–15%) window in which HD10447 catalyses either a formal review or informal KD policy drift (Scenarios 2+4 cumulative = 30%). Window closes after 2026-05-07 answer.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Analytic basis</strong>: scenario-analysis.md probability assignment (20% + 10%).</li>
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgment-4--narrow-policy-surprise-window-confidence-low-medium">
 <li><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Very High — small evidence shifts move probability markedly.</li>
 <li><strong>Addresses</strong>: PIR-2, PIR-6.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements">Information gaps / collection requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements">Information gaps / collection requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -426,22 +426,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-information-gaps--collection-requirements">Information gaps / collect
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Gap</th><th>Collection action</th><th>By when</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S leadership position on HD10447 messaging</td><td>Monitor S party website + front-bench press</td><td>2026-04-28</td></tr><tr><td>Företagarna / Svenskt Näringsliv response</td><td>Watch sector press 2026-04-28 through 2026-05-06</td><td>2026-05-06</td></tr><tr><td>Additional S interpellations on SME labour cost</td><td>Daily riksdag-regering poll for <code>parti:S iid:SME</code></td><td>daily</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen internal M-KD positioning</td><td>Not publicly observable — caveat</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary">Alternative analysis (Devil's Advocate summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary">Alternative analysis (Devil's Advocate summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-alternative-analysis-devils-advocate-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>See <code>devils-advocate.md</code>. Alternative framings H2 (constituency-driven) and H3 (KD-fracture signalling) scored lower but remain logged; rebase if coordination signals fail to emerge by 2026-05-06.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-scale-legend">Confidence scale legend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-scale-legend"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-scale-legend">Confidence scale legend<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-scale-legend"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>VERY HIGH</strong>: convergent high-quality A1 sources; multi-method corroboration.</li>
 <li><strong>HIGH</strong>: strong A2 sources + internally-consistent pattern; independent corroboration.</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH / MEDIUM</strong>: partial corroboration or base-rate extrapolation.</li>
 <li><strong>LOW-MEDIUM / LOW</strong>: single source or speculative inference.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-consistency--change">Consistency &#x26; change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consistency--change"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-consistency--change">Consistency &#x26; change<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-consistency--change"></a></h3>
 <p>Consistent with <code>historical-parallels.md</code> pattern of pre-election S wedge campaigns. Material change if 2026-05-07 answer is a review signal — rebase Judgments 2 and 3.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: DIW weighting (Data-Importance-Weight) per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a> §DIW.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title (shortened)</th><th align="center">DIW</th><th align="center">Tier</th><th>Rationale</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">HD10447</a></td><td>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</td><td align="center"><strong>0.62</strong></td><td align="center">L2+ Priority</td><td>Only new IP today; reopens a 2024 fiscal decision with measurable SME impact; directly cites Sweden-vs-EU growth gap; wedge-ready</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447">DIW breakdown — HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447">DIW breakdown — HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -514,13 +514,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-breakdown--hd10447">DIW breakdown — HD10447<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Value</th><th align="center">Contribution</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document type (interpellation)</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">0.40</td></tr><tr><td>Ministerial seniority (Energy &#x26; Industry, cabinet-level)</td><td align="center">× 1.4</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">+0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral horizon (Sep 2026, 5 months)</td><td align="center">× 1.1</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">+0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder concentration (SMEs, ~1.2M firms)</td><td align="center">× 1.0</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">0.00</td></tr><tr><td>Framing salience (links to GDP growth, fiscal policy)</td><td align="center">× 1.05</td><td align="center">1.0</td><td align="center">+0.02</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total DIW</strong></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"><strong>0.62</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Base 0.40 → adjusted 0.62 after multipliers. Keeps item inside the L2+ Priority tier.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity">Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity">Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If the minister's 2026-05-07 answer signals review → DIW rises to ~0.75 (L3 Intelligence-grade).</li>
 <li>If the answer is flat refusal with no new data → DIW drops back to 0.48 (L2 Strategic).</li>
 <li>If S escalates with a motion before 2026-06-21 session-end → cluster DIW rises to 0.82 (L3).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual">Cluster-level scoring (contextual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual">Cluster-level scoring (contextual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -557,14 +557,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-level-scoring-contextual">Cluster-level scoring (contextual)<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster (HD10428–HD10447 window)</th><th>Member dok_ids</th><th align="center">Cluster DIW</th><th align="center">Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SME-cost economics</td><td>HD10444 (S, 04-22) · HD10447 (S, 04-23)</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td>Labour / social protection</td><td>HD10443 · HD10440 · HD10446 (S, 04-21/22)</td><td align="center">0.58</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr><tr><td>Security / policing</td><td>HD10439 Stockholm police shortage (S, 04-20)</td><td align="center">0.62</td><td align="center">L2+</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare</td><td>HD10432 · HD10442 (S, 04-15/21)</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">L2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking">Priority signal — bullet ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking">Priority signal — bullet ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-signal--bullet-ranking"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">HD10447</a> — <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em>, DIW 0.62 — wedge-ready (A2).</li>
 <li>HD10444 — <em>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</em>, DIW 0.55 — complementary SME-cost IP (A2), source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a>.</li>
 <li>HD10439 — <em>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</em>, DIW 0.62 — separate salience axis (A2), source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10439.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10439.html</a>.</li>
 <li>HD10443 — <em>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</em>, DIW 0.48 — labour cluster (A2), source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10443.html</a>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-1">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-1">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-1"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   HD10447["HD10447 · DIW 0.62&#x3C;br/>sick-pay reimbursement"]
   HD10444["HD10444 · DIW 0.55&#x3C;br/>arbetsgivaravgifter"]
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-1">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style HD10443 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style HD10439 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style CL1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2, primary)</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a> (A2)</li>
@@ -587,34 +587,34 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-1">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: Likely media frames for HD10447 and the cluster campaign.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-candidates">Frame candidates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-candidates"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred">Frame A — "Regeringen tog bort stödet — och företagen lider" (S-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-candidates">Frame candidates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-candidates"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred">Frame A — "Regeringen tog bort stödet — och företagen lider" (S-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-a--regeringen-tog-bort-stödet--och-företagen-lider-s-preferred"></a></h4>
 <p>S narrative frame. Emphasises small-business pain, Swedish growth gap vs EU, KD's "<em>företagens parti</em>" contradiction.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Dagens Arbete, ETC, Aftonbladet (ledar), Arbetet.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Företagarna partial amplification (if they pick the business-cost angle without partisan tie-in).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred">Frame B — "Effektiviserad företagshjälp — inget att ångra" (Tidö-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred">Frame B — "Effektiviserad företagshjälp — inget att ångra" (Tidö-preferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-b--effektiviserad-företagshjälp--inget-att-ångra-tidö-preferred"></a></h4>
 <p>Government counter-frame. Emphasises other measures (arbetsgivaravgifter-sänkningar, växa-stöd), administrativ förenkling.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Svenska Dagbladet (borgerlig ledar), Expressen ledar, Bulletin.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Skattebetalarnas förening, Timbro.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish">Frame C — "En kostnad man inte räknat på" (neutral/wonkish)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish">Frame C — "En kostnad man inte räknat på" (neutral/wonkish)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-c--en-kostnad-man-inte-räknat-på-neutralwonkish"></a></h4>
 <p>Analytical / data-centric frame. Cites SCB data, Tillväxtverket rapporter, Finanspolitiska rådet.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Dagens industri, Dagens Nyheter economy section, Sveriges Radio Ekonomiekot.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Academic economists; think tanks.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative">Frame D — "Sverige ut ur Norden" (comparative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative">Frame D — "Sverige ut ur Norden" (comparative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-d--sverige-ut-ur-norden-comparative"></a></h4>
 <p>Comparative/Nordic frame — Sweden as Nordic outlier on SME-sick-pay buffer.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Outlets most likely to carry</strong>: Nordic-oriented outlets, Europaportalen, Altinget.</li>
 <li><strong>Amplifiers</strong>: Nordic labour-market researchers.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07">Frame volume forecast (7-day horizon from 2026-05-07)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07">Frame volume forecast (7-day horizon from 2026-05-07)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">xychart-beta
   title Expected coverage volume per frame (articles, D0–D7)
   x-axis [D0, D1, D2, D3, D5, D7]
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-volume-forecast-7-day-horizon-from-2026-05-07">Frame volume for
   line [0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 2]
   line [0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2]</pre>
 <p>Legend (line order): A (S-frame) · B (Tidö-frame) · C (wonkish) · D (comparative).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-contestation-matrix">Narrative contestation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-contestation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-contestation-matrix">Narrative contestation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-contestation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -661,24 +661,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-contestation-matrix">Narrative contestation matrix<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th align="center">Source authority (Admiralty)</th><th align="center">Public resonance</th><th align="center">Policy-shift leverage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>A — S-preferred</td><td align="center">B2</td><td align="center">HIGH (SME pain)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>B — Tidö-preferred</td><td align="center">B2</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (wonkish offsets)</td><td align="center">HIGH (status-quo preservation)</td></tr><tr><td>C — wonkish</td><td align="center">A2–B1</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td align="center">HIGH (drives review scenarios)</td></tr><tr><td>D — comparative</td><td align="center">A1</td><td align="center">LOW (abstract)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM (intellectual asset for opposition)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk">Disinformation / manipulation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk">Disinformation / manipulation risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-disinformation--manipulation-risk"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Statistics cherry-picking</strong>: both sides likely to cherry-pick start/end years on sick-leave cost trends. Standard political-communication pattern; no evidence of malicious disinformation.</li>
 <li><strong>Deepfake / synthetic media</strong>: none detected in prior Tidö-opposition exchanges on this issue; residual baseline risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators">Recommended narrative-monitoring indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators">Recommended narrative-monitoring indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-narrative-monitoring-indicators"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Word-frequency tracking on Mediearkivet: "sjuklönekostnad" · "småföretag" · "företagens parti" · "sjuklön".</li>
 <li>Lead-editorial endorsements DN, SvD, Expressen, Aftonbladet D0–D3.</li>
 <li>Social-media amplification: @socialdemokraterna, @kd, @SvensktNLiv accounts.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — frame typology is grounded in past cluster-campaigns (B2); specific volume forecast is indicative (C3 model output).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: HD10447 <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em>. <strong>Lens</strong>: 6-lens stakeholder matrix per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md"><code>stakeholder-impact.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-matrix">6-lens matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-matrix">6-lens matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -783,13 +783,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-6-lens-matrix">6-lens matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Position</th><th align="center">Influence</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Executive</td><td>Energi- och näringsminister <strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong></td><td>Defend 2024 decision; may signal "continued dialogue"</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>HD10447 addressee (A2) <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>1. Executive</td><td>Finansminister <strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong></td><td>Fiscal-rule defensive; unlikely to support reinstatement</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>2024 BP record (A2) <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>2. Legislative</td><td><strong>Patrik Lundqvist (S)</strong> (filer)</td><td>Opposition accountability; pro-review</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>HD10447 signatory (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>2. Legislative</td><td><strong>Socialdemokraterna</strong> party leadership</td><td>Coordinated cluster campaign</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>12/16 cluster IPs (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>2. Legislative</td><td><strong>V / MP / C</strong> (potential co-signers)</td><td>Currently passive on HD10447</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>No co-signature in HD10447 (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>3. Administrative</td><td><strong>Tillväxtverket</strong> (SME agency)</td><td>Historically quantified the 2016–2024 programme</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Tillväxtverket rapport 2023:8 (A2) <a href="https://tillvaxtverket.se/">https://tillvaxtverket.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>3. Administrative</td><td><strong>Försäkringskassan</strong></td><td>Administered the reimbursement 2016–2024</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>FK årsredovisning 2024 (A2) <a href="https://forsakringskassan.se/">https://forsakringskassan.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>4. Industry</td><td><strong>Svenskt Näringsliv</strong></td><td>Pro-reinstatement (has lobbied since 2024)</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>2024 remiss submission (A2) <a href="https://svensktnaringsliv.se/">https://svensktnaringsliv.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>4. Industry</td><td><strong>Företagarna</strong></td><td>Strongly pro-reinstatement — core SME constituency</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>2024 policy position (A2) <a href="https://foretagarna.se/">https://foretagarna.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>5. Civil society</td><td><strong>LO</strong> (trade union)</td><td>Focus on worker protection; indirect support for sick-leave buffers</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>LO 2025 arbetslivs-rapport (A2) <a href="https://lo.se/">https://lo.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>5. Civil society</td><td><strong>TCO / SACO</strong></td><td>Neutral-to-supportive on employer burden relief</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>TCO 2024 remiss (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>6. International</td><td><strong>OECD</strong></td><td>Historically flagged SME sick-pay burden as growth-sensitive</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>OECD Economic Survey: Sweden 2023 (A1) <a href="https://www.oecd.org/">https://www.oecd.org/</a></td></tr><tr><td>6. International</td><td><strong>EU Commission</strong></td><td>Monitors Swedish fiscal-policy trajectory; no direct line on sick-pay</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>European Semester 2025 report (A1)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-named-actors-summary">Named actors (summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-named-actors-summary">Named actors (summary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-actors-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Patrik Lundqvist (S)</strong> — interpellation filer, labour-market focus.</li>
 <li><strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong> — Energy &#x26; Industry Minister, KD party leader since 2015.</li>
 <li><strong>Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</strong> — Finance Minister, fiscal-rule custodian.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   PL[Patrik Lundqvist&#x3C;br/>S filer] -->|files IP| RI[Riksdagen]
   RI -->|delivers| EB[Ebba Busch&#x3C;br/>KD minister]
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
   style SN fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style FO fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style S_party fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-winners--losers-matrix">Winners / losers matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winners--losers-matrix">Winners / losers matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -843,25 +843,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-winners--losers-matrix">Winners / losers matrix<a class="" aria-hidde
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Actor</th><th>If minister refuses review</th><th>If minister announces review</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lundqvist / S</td><td>Electoral narrative win</td><td>Procedural win + diluted narrative</td></tr><tr><td>Busch / KD</td><td>Short-term cost; SME-lobby friction</td><td>Possible finance-ministry friction</td></tr><tr><td>SME federations</td><td>No policy gain; messaging leverage</td><td>Direct policy win</td></tr><tr><td>LO</td><td>Neutral</td><td>Indirect win (worker protection)</td></tr><tr><td>M / Svantesson</td><td>Fiscal-rule held</td><td>Potential fiscal-rule friction</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-1">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-1">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-1"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — named stakeholders and their historical positions are well-documented; individual response calibration awaits the 2026-05-07 answer.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Dated, observable indicators that will update probability estimates across scenarios. 4 horizons: 72h · week · month · election.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27">Horizon 1 — Next 72h (through 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27">Horizon 1 — Next 72h (through 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-1--next-72h-through-2026-04-27"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>2026-04-25</strong>: Additional S interpellation on labour-cost or SME theme filed. (Tests H1 coordinated campaign.) Source: data.riksdagen.se/dokumentstatus daily poll.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-26</strong>: Företagarna or Svenskt Näringsliv public comment on the abolition or HD10447. Source: organization press pages.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-27</strong>: First national press reference to HD10447 (Mediearkivet scan). Absence = lower H1 weight.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01">Horizon 2 — Next 7 days (through 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01">Horizon 2 — Next 7 days (through 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-2--next-7-days-through-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
 <ol start="4">
 <li><strong>2026-04-29</strong>: S front-bench coordinated statement or op-ed on SME costs. Presence → reinforces H1; absence → shift toward H2.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-30</strong>: KD internal signalling (KD MP op-ed, Företagarna survey release). Presence → reinforces H3 KD-fracture.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-01</strong>: Total count of S labour-cost IPs filed April 2026. Threshold: ≥ 6 = clear coordinated campaign; 3–5 = ambiguous; ≤ 2 = weak H1.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24">Horizon 3 — Month window (through 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24">Horizon 3 — Month window (through 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24"></a></h3>
 <ol start="7">
 <li><strong>2026-05-07</strong>: <strong>SISVA — Minister Busch answers HD10447.</strong> Pivotal indicator. Keyword scan of the answer for: "<em>översyn</em>", "<em>utvärdering</em>", "<em>Tillväxtverket</em>" (→ Scenario 2), "<em>överskottsmålet</em>", "<em>Finanspolitiska rådet</em>" (→ Scenario 3), "<em>förenklat</em>", "<em>växa-stöd</em>" (→ Scenario 1).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-08</strong>: Media coverage volume D+1 after answer (target: ≥ 5 national outlets = narrative capture; ≤ 2 = frame failed).</li>
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-3--month-window-through-2026-05-24">Horizon 3 — Month windo
 <li><strong>2026-05-20</strong>: Tidö budget-signal leak or FI spring proposition contains any mitigating SME measure.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-24</strong>: 4-week polling update: S vs Tidö delta movement. Baseline delta currently +5 pp red-green; > +6 pp = HD10447 cluster landing; &#x3C; +4 pp = narrative stalled.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13">Horizon 4 — Election window (through 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13">Horizon 4 — Election window (through 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13"></a></h3>
 <ol start="12">
 <li><strong>2026-06-18</strong>: Riksdagens sommaruppehåll begins — narrative locks for summer. Track final positions of all actors heading into recess.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-07Q3</strong>: Sommaravtal (party summer agreements / pre-campaign positioning). Watch for S manifesto inclusion.</li>
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-horizon-4--election-window-through-2026-09-13">Horizon 4 — Election
 <li><strong>2026-08-31</strong>: Late-summer polling snapshot: KD vs 4% threshold (existential for Tidö); S vs 35% (outright-majority reach).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-09-13</strong>: <strong>Valdag — seat allocation</strong>. Ex-post test of voter-segmentation.md shift predictions.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-tracking-matrix">Indicator tracking matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-tracking-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-tracking-matrix">Indicator tracking matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-tracking-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -975,48 +975,48 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-tracking-matrix">Indicator tracking matrix<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Probability-moves scenario</th><th>Direction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>New S IP filed</td><td>72h</td><td>S1→S2 weight</td><td>+ H1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Press pickup</td><td>72h</td><td>B-frame vs A-frame</td><td>narrative capture</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>S op-ed</td><td>week</td><td>H1 strength</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>KD signalling</td><td>week</td><td>H3</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>≥6 IPs</td><td>week</td><td>H1 strength</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Answer wording</td><td>month</td><td>Scenario probability</td><td>routes</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Media D+1</td><td>month</td><td>frame landing</td><td>narrative</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Budget-signal</td><td>month</td><td>Scenario 2/4</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Polling delta</td><td>month</td><td>net political impact</td><td>quantified</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Sommaruppehåll positions</td><td>election</td><td>campaign lock-in</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>KD 4% threshold</td><td>election</td><td>coalition-math</td><td>existential</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>Valdag</td><td>election</td><td>ex-post</td><td>final</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-update-frequency">Expected update frequency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-update-frequency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-update-frequency">Expected update frequency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-update-frequency"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Indicators 1–3: poll daily.</li>
 <li>Indicators 4–6: weekly poll.</li>
 <li>Indicators 7–11: event-driven; auto-trigger on 2026-05-07 answer publication.</li>
 <li>Indicators 12–16: monthly cadence through Sep 2026.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-2">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-2">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-2"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> on indicator specification (observable, dated, falsifiable). <strong>LOW-MEDIUM</strong> on implied probability updates (subject to news-cycle noise).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: Possible outcomes from HD10447 between 2026-05-07 (SISVA) and the 2026-09-13 general election. <strong>Method</strong>: 4 distinct scenarios, probabilities sum to 100%, leading indicator per scenario.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50">Scenario 1 — "Defensive defend" (P = 50%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50">Scenario 1 — "Defensive defend" (P = 50%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--defensive-defend-p--50"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister Busch answers on 2026-05-07 defending the 2024 abolition, citing offsetting measures (arbetsgivaravgifter reductions, växa-stöd). No policy change; brief media cycle.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Minister's written answer cites <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> / <em>växa-stöd</em> ≥ 2 times and contains no "review" / "översyn" language.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: S files a motion in autumn 2026 budget round; narrative persists but narrow audience.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: Neutral for Tidö; marginal S gain in SME-owner cohort.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20">Scenario 2 — "Partial review opens" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20">Scenario 2 — "Partial review opens" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--partial-review-opens-p--20"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister signals a Tillväxtverket-led review of effects on micro-firms (&#x3C; 10 employees). Plays as partial S win, partial KD de-escalation.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Answer contains "Tillväxtverket" + "översyn" / "utvärdering".</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: Review terms released within 60 days; industry federations publish input.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: KD neutralises wedge; S loses unique-ownership claim.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20">Scenario 3 — "Fiscal-rule wall" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20">Scenario 3 — "Fiscal-rule wall" (P = 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--fiscal-rule-wall-p--20"></a></h3>
 <p>Minister — likely backed by Finance Minister Svantesson — answers with a firm fiscal-rule line: no reinstatement path compatible with overskottsmålet at current trajectory. Harder defensive tone than Scenario 1.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Finanspolitiska rådet referenced, or "överskottsmålet" cited ≥ 1 time in the answer.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: S escalates with a co-signed motion invoking V or C to split the fiscal-rule argument.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: Polarises electorate on fiscal-rule question itself; risk for both sides.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10">Scenario 4 — "Coalition drift on KD" (P = 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10">Scenario 4 — "Coalition drift on KD" (P = 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--coalition-drift-on-kd-p--10"></a></h3>
 <p>KD internal business-base pressure (Företagarna, SME owners) produces a quiet policy realignment: partial reinstatement floated informally via KD MPs, even without a formal minister commitment.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: KD MP individual motion or KD-affiliated op-ed citing SME burden within 45 days of the answer.</li>
 <li><strong>Second-order</strong>: Tidö internal negotiation — M / SD resist; public friction visible in press.</li>
 <li><strong>Election impact</strong>: High — exposes Tidö internal divergence on SME policy, core KD brand risk.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-probability-table">Probability table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-probability-table">Probability table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-probability-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-probability-table">Probability table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="center">P</th><th align="center">Cumulative</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 Defensive defend</td><td align="center">50%</td><td align="center">50%</td></tr><tr><td>2 Partial review</td><td align="center">20%</td><td align="center">70%</td></tr><tr><td>3 Fiscal-rule wall</td><td align="center">20%</td><td align="center">90%</td></tr><tr><td>4 Coalition drift on KD</td><td align="center">10%</td><td align="center">100%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-2">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-2">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-2"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   MAY7[2026-05-07 answer] --> S1[S1 Defensive defend 50%]
   MAY7 --> S2[S2 Partial review 20%]
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-2">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style S2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
   style S3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style S4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1086,13 +1086,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Risk if wrong</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Minister personally answers (not delegated)</td><td>Low — IPs require ministerial answer by custom</td></tr><tr><td>FI fiscal path unchanged by then</td><td>Low — no BP revision expected before May</td></tr><tr><td>No cross-opposition co-signing before May</td><td>Medium — V could still co-file supporting IPs</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-3">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-3">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-3"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — scenarios reflect the observable distribution of past ministerial answers on reopened budget decisions (base-rate ~60% defensive, ~20% partial review, ~15% fiscal-rule wall, ~5% coalition drift based on 2022–2025 IP archive).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: Risks triggered by HD10447 and the wider S-opposition interpellation campaign. <strong>Method</strong>: 5-dimension register (Political / Economic / Institutional / Social / Reputational), L × I scoring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">Likelihood (1–5)</th><th align="center">Impact (1–5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">R1</td><td>Political</td><td>Minister Busch's 2026-05-07 answer produces a media clip that fuels S election narrative</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">12</td><td>HD10447 SISVA (A2) <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td align="center">R2</td><td>Economic</td><td>Reinstatement of the reimbursement adds ~SEK 1.3 bn/year to the state budget, pressuring FI targets</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">6</td><td>2024 BP impact assessment (A2) <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td align="center">R3</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Budget-round amendment effort fails for lack of cross-opposition co-signing, weakening S leverage</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">6</td><td>HD10447 single-signer (A2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">R4</td><td>Social</td><td>SME hiring behaviour remains depressed through 2026 H2, reinforcing S claim empirically</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td>SCB arbetsmarknad 2025 Q4 (A2) <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td align="center">R5</td><td>Reputational</td><td>KD loses credibility on pro-business narrative among SME owners</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td>Företagarna 2024 position paper (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   R1[R1 Minister answer&#x3C;br/>media clip] --> R5[R5 KD credibility]
   R4[R4 SME hiring weak] --> R1
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
   style R4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style R5 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style EL fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates">Posterior probabilities (Bayesian updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates">Posterior probabilities (Bayesian updates)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1204,19 +1204,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probabilities-bayesian-updates">Posterior probabilities (Ba
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Event</th><th align="center">Prior P</th><th align="center">Posterior P (given HD10447)</th><th align="center">Δ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>BP2026/27 S amendment on sick-pay reimbursement</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center"><strong>0.55</strong></td><td align="center">+0.20</td></tr><tr><td>Minister announces policy review in May</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">+0.02</td></tr><tr><td>SME-cost wedge enters top-5 S campaign themes</td><td align="center">0.50</td><td align="center"><strong>0.75</strong></td><td align="center">+0.25</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-opposition IP co-signing in next 30 days</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">+0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance">Mitigations (for an observer, not a partisan stance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance">Mitigations (for an observer, not a partisan stance)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitigations-for-an-observer-not-a-partisan-stance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Track SCB arbetsmarknad + företagsdynamik releases monthly to empirically test the growth-drag claim.</li>
 <li>Monitor 2026-05-07 response verbatim (chamber transcript) for <em>review / oversight</em> keywords.</li>
 <li>Watch BP2026/27 autumn proposition draft for reinstatement language.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-4">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-4">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — single new document today but rich historical record (2016–2024 programme) and strong cluster context. Admiralty <code>A2</code> for all primary sources.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-s--w--o--t">S / W / O / T<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--w--o--t"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447">Strengths (of the opposition's position on HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-s--w--o--t">S / W / O / T<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s--w--o--t"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447">Strengths (of the opposition's position on HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Concrete fiscal reference point</strong> — the 2016–2024 <em>ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader</em> is a documented, costed programme (SEK 1.0–1.5 bn/year) — not abstract rhetoric. Evidence: HD10447 text paragraph 2, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2).</li>
 <li><strong>Coalitional arithmetic</strong> — pressure targets KD specifically, stressing the junior Tidö partner most sensitive to SME narrative. Evidence: <code>HD10447</code> addressed directly to Busch (KD).</li>
@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths-of-the-oppositions-position-on-hd10447">Strengths (of the o
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Supporting evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Documented, costed programme</td><td>HD10447 text; 2023 budget bill at <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Targets junior Tidö partner (KD)</td><td>HD10447 addressee metadata (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Coordinated opposition pattern</td><td>12/16 S-filed IPs in HD10428–HD10447 window (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Low legislative velocity</strong> — an interpellation cannot amend or repeal; it produces a response on the floor, nothing more. Evidence: Riksdagsordningen 8 kap. (A1) <a href="https://riksdagen.se/">https://riksdagen.se/</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>No alternative financing</strong> — HD10447 asks the minister to "see over" the issue but proposes no S alternative funding source. Evidence: text paragraph 6 of <code>HD10447</code> (A2).</li>
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Procedural ceiling</td><td>Riksdagsordningen — source <a href="https://riksdagen.se/">https://riksdagen.se/</a> (A1); no amending power in <code>HD10447</code></td></tr><tr><td>No funding alternative</td><td>HD10447 text, final paragraph (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Single signatory</td><td>HD10447 metadata (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>May 2026 answer</strong> as a televised setpiece (2026-05-07 SISVA). Evidence: HD10447 workflow <em>SISVA: 2026-05-07</em> (A2). Source: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Budget-debate linkage</strong> — reopens a 2024 decision, enabling S to loop it into the autumn 2026/27 budget proposal (BP). Evidence: pattern of S budget amendments cataloged at <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2).</li>
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Televised 2026-05-07 response</td><td>HD10447 SISVA (A2) <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>Budget-round re-entry</td><td>2024 budget bill record <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>SME lobby alignment</td><td>2024 consultation submissions <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position">Threats (to the opposition's position)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position">Threats (to the opposition's position)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government counter-framing</strong> — Busch can pivot to ongoing <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> reductions for young workers and argue the net burden fell. Evidence: 2024 budget bill <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2).</li>
 <li><strong>Fiscal constraint line</strong> — Finance Minister Svantesson (M) can frame reinstatement as incompatible with FI's fiscal targets. Evidence: Finanspolitiska rådet 2025 report <a href="https://www.finanspolitiskaradet.se/">https://www.finanspolitiskaradet.se/</a> (A2).</li>
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats-to-the-oppositions-position">Threats (to the opposition's pos
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Minister counter-frame</td><td>2024 budget bill <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>FI fiscal-rule line</td><td>Finanspolitiska rådet 2025 report (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>IP-topic dilution</td><td>HD10444 at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a> (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1350,12 +1350,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Strengths</th><th>Weaknesses</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO:</strong> Use the televised 2026-05-07 answer to loop the SME-cost claim into the BP2026/27 debate.</td><td><strong>WO:</strong> Co-sign with V and MP ahead of budget round to multiply pressure.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST:</strong> Pre-empt minister counter-frame by citing FR 2025 own assessment of SME cost-sensitivity.</td><td><strong>WT:</strong> Narrow HD10447 narrative to differentiate from HD10444 to avoid dilution.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S-Strength 1 ↔ O-Opportunity 2: documented cost base directly supports a budget-round amendment. Evidence: HD10447 + 2024 BP record.</li>
 <li>W-Weakness 1 ↔ T-Threat 2: procedural ceiling + FI constraint compound into a "symbolic-only" outcome unless paired with a BP motion.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-3">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-3">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-3"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title SWOT force-field — HD10447 opposition posture
     x-axis "Internal weakness" --> "Internal strength"
@@ -1374,13 +1374,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-3">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
     "FI fiscal line": [0.5, 0.18]</pre>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Frame</strong>: Political-threat taxonomy applied to HD10447 as an opposition accountability instrument. <strong>Method</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-threat-framework.md"><code>political-threat-framework.md</code></a> + lightweight MITRE-style TTP mapping for political action.</p>
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: MEDIUM · <strong>Severity</strong>: MEDIUM · <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (A2 single-source IP filing, dated 2026-05-07 floor-debate window observable).</p>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Scope note</strong>: "Threat" in this political intelligence context means <em>actions that may degrade the governing coalition's electoral and legislative standing</em>, not cyber/physical threats. The subject is a legitimate, constitutionally-sanctioned instrument (interpellation). This analysis is descriptive, neutral, and public-source only.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits">Political Threat Taxonomy hits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits">Political Threat Taxonomy hits<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy-hits">Political Threat Taxonomy hits<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Category</th><th align="center">Observed?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Accountability pressure</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>HD10447 directly demands ministerial review (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Narrative reframing</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>Ties Sweden-vs-EU growth gap to the 2024 policy (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition wedge</td><td align="center">PARTIAL</td><td>Targets KD specifically within the Tidö coalition (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Media setup for 2026-05-07 floor speech</td><td align="center">LIKELY</td><td>SISVA date then televised chamber debate (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>Disinformation</td><td align="center">NO</td><td>Claims are verifiable against 2024 BP record</td></tr><tr><td>Procedural obstruction</td><td align="center">NO</td><td>Single IP does not block legislation</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree">Attack tree (political-action tree)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree">Attack tree (political-action tree)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   ROOT[Goal: Electorally damage Tidö coalition&#x3C;br/>on SME-economics axis]
   ROOT --> A1[Branch A: Force minister&#x3C;br/>on-record commitment/refusal]
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-political-action-tree">Attack tree (political-action tree
   style A2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style A3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style A1x fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages">Chain of political-communications stages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages">Chain of political-communications stages<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-chain-of-political-communications-stages">Chain of political-communic
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Activity</th><th>HD10447 observation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reconnaissance</td><td>Identify policy decisions with measurable constituency impact</td><td>2024 reimbursement abolition identified</td></tr><tr><td>Weaponisation</td><td>Frame as interpellation with minister addressee</td><td>Lundqvist (S) drafts text citing growth gap</td></tr><tr><td>Delivery</td><td>File with Riksdagen, schedule chamber announcement</td><td>HD10447 announced 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td>Exploitation</td><td>Televised chamber answer 2026-05-07</td><td>Pending</td></tr><tr><td>Installation</td><td>Narrative enters media cycle</td><td>Watch: 2026-05-07 through 2026-05-14</td></tr><tr><td>Command &#x26; Control</td><td>Campaign coordination with parallel IPs, press, budget round</td><td>HD10444 companion filed; BP2026/27 pipeline</td></tr><tr><td>Actions on objective</td><td>Vote-share shift on SME-cost axis</td><td>Polling Nov 2025 through Sep 2026</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue">MITRE-style TTP annotation (informal, political-action analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue">MITRE-style TTP annotation (informal, political-action analogue)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1525,32 +1525,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-annotation-informal-political-action-analogue">MITRE-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>TTP (political)</th><th align="center">Observed</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T1: Parliamentary instrument use (IP)</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>HD10447</td></tr><tr><td>T2: Issue-cluster campaign (coordinated IPs)</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>HD10428 through HD10447</td></tr><tr><td>T3: Minister-targeted wedge</td><td align="center">YES</td><td>KD-specific addressee</td></tr><tr><td>T4: Cross-opposition coalition (multi-party co-signing)</td><td align="center">NO</td><td>Single signatory</td></tr><tr><td>T5: Budget-amendment follow-through</td><td align="center">PENDING</td><td>Watch BP2026/27</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-counter-posture-government-side">Counter-posture (government side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-posture-government-side"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counter-posture-government-side">Counter-posture (government side)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counter-posture-government-side"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>CT-1</strong> — Minister prepares data-backed response citing <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> reductions for young workers and net SME burden change.</li>
 <li><strong>CT-2</strong> — Finance ministry publishes budget-rule line: "no reinstatement compatible with FI framework at current fiscal path".</li>
 <li><strong>CT-3</strong> — KD-specific messaging emphasises SME-growth measures already implemented (for example <em>växa-stöd</em>).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-5">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-5">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-5"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — reasoning from a single new document plus 3-week cluster; baseline supported by open parliamentary archive.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10447">HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Document</strong>: HD10447 — <em>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</em>
 <strong>Type</strong>: Interpellation
 <strong>Submitter</strong>: Patrik Lundqvist (S), Gävleborg
 <strong>Addressee</strong>: Ebba Busch (KD), energi- och näringsminister
 <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-23 · <strong>SISVA</strong>: 2026-05-07
 <strong>Primary source</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447</a> (Admiralty A1)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Lundqvist asks Minister Busch:</p>
 <ol>
 <li>What is the regeringens förklaring to the försämringen för småföretagen which the abolition of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader caused?</li>
 <li>Does the regeringen intend to återinföra stödet eller alternativ stödform riktad specifikt till small business?</li>
 </ol>
 <p>Framing: Sweden's growth gap vs EU, SME employment importance, abolition cost borne specifically by small firms.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-7-dimension">Classification (7-dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-7-dimension"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-7-dimension">Classification (7-dimension)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-7-dimension"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-7-dimension">Classification (7-dimension)<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Interpellation</td></tr><tr><td>Partistrategisk nivå</td><td>High (labour-cost wedge)</td></tr><tr><td>Tidshorisont</td><td>Short (SISVA 13 days)</td></tr><tr><td>Koalitionsrisk</td><td>Medium (KD-targeted)</td></tr><tr><td>Väljargrupp</td><td>SME owners, SME employees</td></tr><tr><td>Geografisk räckvidd</td><td>National, with Gävleborg constituency amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Admiralty rating</td><td>A1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighting">DIW weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighting"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighting">DIW weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighting"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1639,39 +1639,39 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighting">DIW weighting<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1-5)</th><th align="center">Weight</th><th align="center">Contribution</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Decision relevance</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">1.20</td></tr><tr><td>Impact</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.75</td></tr><tr><td>Weight (institutional)</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">0.20</td><td align="center">0.60</td></tr><tr><td>Timeliness</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.60</td></tr><tr><td>Novelty</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">0.20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"><strong>3.35</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Cluster-adjusted: +0.5 for campaign membership → <strong>3.85</strong> (above analysis threshold of 3.0).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-one-pager">SWOT (one-pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-one-pager"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-swot-one-pager">SWOT (one-pager)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-one-pager"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S</strong>: Concrete policy target, KD-specific addressee, cluster coherence.</li>
 <li><strong>W</strong>: Single signatory, no press tie-in, soft evidence on SME growth-gap causation.</li>
 <li><strong>O</strong>: Pre-election window; KD brand vulnerability; Nordic comparative framing.</li>
 <li><strong>T</strong>: Minister defensive reply (70% likely); fiscal-rule wall; S over-reach if overplayed.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-posture">Risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-posture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-posture">Risk posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-posture"></a></h3>
 <p>Low procedural risk; medium political risk for KD (brand); low risk for S (downside: narrative fails to land).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated">Stakeholder map (abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated">Stakeholder map (abbreviated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map-abbreviated"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Patrik Lundqvist (S)</strong>: Gävleborg MP; prior labour-policy IPs. Motivation: constituency SME service + party alignment.</li>
 <li><strong>Ebba Busch (KD)</strong>: Must answer personally; brand risk; likely defensive answer.</li>
 <li><strong>Företagarna</strong>: Potential amplifier; brand-aligned with S framing on this issue.</li>
 <li><strong>Finance Minister Svantesson (M)</strong>: Non-addressee but fiscal backstop; may signal through written press.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd">Scenario routing (links to folder-level <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd">Scenario routing (links to folder-level <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-routing-links-to-folder-level-scenario-analysismd"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S1 Defensive defend — 50% — Busch answer cites växa-stöd / arbetsgivaravgifter</li>
 <li>S2 Partial review — 20% — Tillväxtverket review signalled</li>
 <li>S3 Fiscal-rule wall — 20% — överskottsmål cited</li>
 <li>S4 Coalition drift — 10% — KD-internal movement</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgment-document-level">Key Judgment (document-level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-document-level"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-document-level">Key Judgment (document-level)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-document-level"></a></h3>
 <p>HD10447 is a credible, well-targeted opposition interpellation functioning as a <strong>narrative-capture instrument</strong>, not a realistic policy-change lever. Expected outcome: narrative gain for S, minor brand cost for KD, no policy change in the 2026–2026 mandate period. <strong>Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH.</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-references">Cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-references">Cross-references<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Folder index: <code>../README.md</code></li>
 <li>Cluster context: <code>../cross-reference-map.md</code></li>
 <li>Scenario probabilities: <code>../scenario-analysis.md</code></li>
 <li>Election impact: <code>../election-2026-analysis.md</code></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-source-summary">Source summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-summary">Source summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1705,9 +1705,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-source-summary">Source summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th>URL</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdagen dokumentstatus HD10447</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447</a></td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen 2024 budget proposition (abolition)</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a></td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>SCB SME labour-market tables</td><td><a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a></td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>Cluster cache</td><td><code>analysis/data/documents/interpellations/*.json</code></td><td>A2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: Swedish general election 2026-09-13 — ~20 weeks from analysis date. HD10447 lands mid-pre-campaign window where narrative positioning hardens before summer recess.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-timeline">Pre-campaign timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-campaign-timeline">Pre-campaign timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
   title Pre-campaign window 2026
   2026-04-24 : HD10447 filed · cluster pattern visible
@@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-timeline">Pre-campaign timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="
   2026-06-18 : Riksdagens sommaruppehåll · narrative locked for summer
   2026-08-15 : Pre-election campaign formally opens
   2026-09-13 : Valdag</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop">Polling baseline (April 2026, aggregated Novus + SCB + Demoskop)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop">Polling baseline (April 2026, aggregated Novus + SCB + Demoskop)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1786,16 +1786,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-polling-baseline-april-2026-aggregated-novus--scb--demoskop">Polling
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">2025H2 avg</th><th align="center">2026Q1 avg</th><th align="center">Trend</th><th align="center">2022 result</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">31%</td><td align="center">33%</td><td align="center">↑</td><td align="center">30.3%</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">18%</td><td align="center">17%</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">19.1%</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">20%</td><td align="center">21%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">20.5%</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">7%</td><td align="center">7%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">6.8%</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">6.7%</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">→</td><td align="center">5.1%</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">5%</td><td align="center">4%</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">5.3%</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">4%</td><td align="center">3%</td><td align="center">↓</td><td align="center">4.6%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Coalition math</strong>: Tidö (M+SD+KD+L) = 45% (down from ~49% at 2022 election). S+MP+V+C = 50%. KD/L sit at or near 4% threshold — existential risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hd10447-impact-vectors">HD10447 impact vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-impact-vectors"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate">Vector 1 — SME-owner cohort (~240k eligible voters; est. 4.1% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hd10447-impact-vectors">HD10447 impact vectors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447-impact-vectors"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate">Vector 1 — SME-owner cohort (~240k eligible voters; est. 4.1% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-1--sme-owner-cohort-240k-eligible-voters-est-41-of-electorate"></a></h4>
 <p>Most directly targeted by the narrative. 2022 split ~35% KD/M, ~20% S. A 5-percentage-point KD/M→S shift in this cohort = ~12k votes nationally, ~0.2% absolute.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate">Vector 2 — SME employees (~1.2M voters; est. 20% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate">Vector 2 — SME employees (~1.2M voters; est. 20% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-2--sme-employees-12m-voters-est-20-of-electorate"></a></h4>
 <p>Indirect — narrative of "unstable employer" and "labour-insecurity" plays here. Small but non-zero shift possible; base-rate ~2 pp shifts in similar past wedge campaigns.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt">Vector 3 — Rural Gävleborg / northern industrial belt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt">Vector 3 — Rural Gävleborg / northern industrial belt<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-3--rural-gävleborg--northern-industrial-belt"></a></h4>
 <p>Lundqvist's home base. Visible constituency service amplifies S local brand; marginal seat impact in valkrets Gävleborg (≈5 S mandat, 2 M, 1 SD at current aggregate).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost">Vector 4 — KD brand damage (no new voters; existential cost)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost">Vector 4 — KD brand damage (no new voters; existential cost)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vector-4--kd-brand-damage-no-new-voters-existential-cost"></a></h4>
 <p>If KD drops below 4%, entire Tidö coalition math collapses (no cabinet). This makes the marginal cost of HD10447 to KD disproportionately high relative to the marginal benefit to S.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-wedge-axis-assessment">Wedge-axis assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wedge-axis-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wedge-axis-assessment">Wedge-axis assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wedge-axis-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1827,22 +1827,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-wedge-axis-assessment">Wedge-axis assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Axis</th><th align="center">Strength</th><th>Why</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cost-of-doing-business</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Salient for SME owners and their employees</td></tr><tr><td>Growth-gap (SE vs EU)</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Technical; requires narrative amplification</td></tr><tr><td>Welfare / fairness</td><td align="center">LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>Not the core S frame here — more "competence" angle</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal responsibility</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Counter-frame available to Tidö; risk cuts both ways</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios">Election impact — most-likely case (combining scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios">Election impact — most-likely case (combining scenarios)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-impact--most-likely-case-combining-scenarios"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Weighted expected shift</strong>: S +0.1 to +0.3 pp nationally; KD −0.1 to −0.4 pp. Small in isolation. <strong>Cumulative effect matters</strong>: HD10447 is 1 of an expected 12–15 S wedge IPs this cycle; stacked effect could reach 1.5–2.5 pp.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd">Recommended indicator set (feeds forward-indicators.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd">Recommended indicator set (feeds forward-indicators.md)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-recommended-indicator-set-feeds-forward-indicatorsmd"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Weekly polling delta Tidö vs red-green bloc</li>
 <li>KD small-business cohort favourability (Företagarna surveys)</li>
 <li>Volume of S labour-policy IPs by week (target: 2–3 per week through June)</li>
 <li>Regeringen press responses mentioning "företagare" / "småföretag"</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-6">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-6">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-6"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — polling baseline and cohort math are A2; attribution of individual IP to measurable shift is B3 (base-rate extrapolation).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Frame</strong>: Current Riksdag (2022–2026) 349 seats. Tidö = M + SD + KD + L. Red-green opposition = S + MP + V + C.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04">Current seat distribution (post-2022 val, adjusted through 2026-04)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04">Current seat distribution (post-2022 val, adjusted through 2026-04)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-distribution-post-2022-val-adjusted-through-2026-04">Cur
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">68</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">73</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">19</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">16</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Majority</strong>: 175 seats. Tidö: 176 (M 68 + SD 73 + KD 19 + L 16). Opposition: 173 (S 107 + V 24 + C 24 + MP 18) — note C is not in the Tidö agreement but votes case-by-case; excluded from Tidö.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion">Hypothetical vote on a HD10447-derived motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion">Hypothetical vote on a HD10447-derived motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion"></a></h3>
 <p>Assume S files a motion proposing partial reinstatement of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader. Probable vote breakdown:</p>
 
 
@@ -1989,8 +1989,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothetical-vote-on-a-hd10447-derived-motion">Hypothetical vote on a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th><th align="right">Frånvarande</th><th align="right">Seats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">107</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">107</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">68</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">68</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">73</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">73</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">24</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">24</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">24</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">19</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">19</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">18</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">16</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">16</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Summa</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>167</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>176</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>6</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>0</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Outcome: <strong>Avslag</strong> (Tidö 176 vs Opposition 167). Motion fails on coalition discipline alone.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-fissure-scenarios">Fissure scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-scenarios"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain">Fissure A — KD defection (2 KD MPs abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-fissure-scenarios">Fissure scenarios<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-scenarios"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain">Fissure A — KD defection (2 KD MPs abstain)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fissure-a--kd-defection-2-kd-mps-abstain">Fissure A — KD defection
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö as whole</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">174</td><td align="right">2</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">167</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td></tr><tr><td>Outcome</td><td align="right"></td><td align="right">Avslag 174 vs 167</td><td align="right">still holds</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Even 2 KD abstentions don't flip the vote. KD brand harm outpaces vote-level impact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja">Fissure B — Full KD breaks (entire KD 19 votes Ja)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja">Fissure B — Full KD breaks (entire KD 19 votes Ja)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fissure-b--full-kd-breaks-entire-kd-19-votes-ja">Fissure B — Full K
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö residual</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">157</td><td align="right">0</td></tr><tr><td>KD + Opp</td><td align="right">186</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td></tr><tr><td>Outcome</td><td align="right"><strong>Bifall 186</strong></td><td align="right"></td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Full KD defection flips the vote but is politically implausible — would trigger coalition collapse before the vote.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters">Fissure C — L defection (L sometimes votes with opposition on SME matters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters">Fissure C — L defection (L sometimes votes with opposition on SME matters)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matters"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2086,7 +2086,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-fissure-c--l-defection-l-sometimes-votes-with-opposition-on-sme-matte
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parti</th><th align="right">Ja</th><th align="right">Nej</th><th align="right">Avstår</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö residual</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">160</td><td align="right">0</td></tr><tr><td>L + Opp</td><td align="right">183</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">6</td></tr><tr><td>Outcome</td><td align="right"><strong>Bifall 183</strong></td><td align="right"></td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>L has more history of selective defection than KD; still politically unlikely on a government-wedge issue.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds">Post-2026 projection (if polling holds)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds">Post-2026 projection (if polling holds)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds"></a></h3>
 <p>Applying 2026Q1 polling (S 33%, M 17%, SD 21%, V 7%, C 5%, MP 5%, KD 4%, L 3%) to 349 seats:</p>
 
 
@@ -2145,7 +2145,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-post-2026-projection-if-polling-holds">Post-2026 projection (if polli
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Projected seats</th><th align="right">Mandat</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">115</td><td align="right">115</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">74</td><td align="right">74</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">60</td><td align="right">60</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">25</td><td align="right">25</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">18</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">18</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">14</td><td align="right">14 — <strong>threshold risk</strong></td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">0</td><td align="right">0 — <strong>below 4% threshold</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Remaining</td><td align="right">25 distributed</td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Post-2026 Tidö</strong> (if L falls below threshold): 148 (M+SD+KD), short of 175 majority. <strong>Red-green bloc</strong>: 176 (S+V+C+MP), majority. HD10447's KD-damage vector matters more for the coalition post-2026 than pre-2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-4">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-4">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-4"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
   subgraph Current2022to2026[Current Riksdag]
     T1[Tidö 176]
@@ -2160,13 +2160,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-4">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style O1 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style T2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style O2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-7">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-7">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-7"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH</strong> on current seats (A1 — Valmyndigheten). <strong>MEDIUM</strong> on 2026 projection (B2 — polling aggregates, seat allocation via Sainte-Laguë).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: Which voter segments does HD10447 move, and how much?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-segments">Primary segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-segments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-segments">Primary segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-segments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2236,7 +2236,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-segments">Primary segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th align="right">Size (eligible)</th><th>2022 vote split</th><th>Relevance to HD10447</th><th>Est. movement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SME owners (&#x3C; 10 emp)</td><td align="right">~240k</td><td>KD/M 35%, S 20%</td><td>HIGH — directly subsidised pre-2024</td><td>S +3–5 pp in-segment</td></tr><tr><td>SME employees</td><td align="right">~1.2M</td><td>~Swedish avg</td><td>MEDIUM — labour-stability narrative</td><td>S +0.5–1 pp</td></tr><tr><td>Public-sector workers</td><td align="right">~1.5M</td><td>S strongest; less exposed</td><td>LOW — not directly affected</td><td>~0</td></tr><tr><td>Freelance / self-employed</td><td align="right">~320k</td><td>mixed; libertarian-leaning</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM — some overlap with SME cohort</td><td>S +1 pp</td></tr><tr><td>Rural / small-town voters</td><td align="right">~1.8M</td><td>SD strong, S second</td><td>MEDIUM — small-town SMEs dominate local economy</td><td>mixed; S +0.5 pp</td></tr><tr><td>Big-city professionals</td><td align="right">~1.4M</td><td>S, M, MP, V; educated</td><td>LOW — not core narrative audience</td><td>~0</td></tr><tr><td>Soft M voters (centrist)</td><td align="right">~0.6M</td><td>M 2022</td><td>MEDIUM — sensitive to "competence" frame</td><td>M → S, C, MP micro-shifts</td></tr><tr><td>Soft KD voters</td><td align="right">~0.3M</td><td>KD 2022</td><td>HIGH — central to KD brand risk</td><td>KD → L, M, abstain</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-narrative-receptivity">Narrative receptivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-receptivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-narrative-receptivity">Narrative receptivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-narrative-receptivity"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title HD10447 narrative reach (size × receptivity)
   x-axis Low receptivity --> High receptivity
@@ -2252,24 +2252,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-narrative-receptivity">Narrative receptivity<a class="" aria-hidden="
   "Rural voters": [0.45, 0.85]
   "Big-city professionals": [0.15, 0.78]
   "Public-sector workers": [0.10, 0.88]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-movement-model-weighted">Movement model (weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-movement-model-weighted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-movement-model-weighted">Movement model (weighted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-movement-model-weighted"></a></h3>
 <p>Expected net S gain from HD10447 = Σ(segment size × movement prob) / electorate ≈ <strong>+0.1–0.3 pp nationally</strong>. Expected KD loss ≈ <strong>−0.1–0.4 pp</strong>. See <code>election-2026-analysis.md</code> for stacking effect across the full S IP campaign.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking">High-information segments for tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking">High-information segments for tracking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-information-segments-for-tracking"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Soft KD voters</strong> — KD brand-damage canary; watch Företagarna panels.</li>
 <li><strong>SME owners</strong> — direct narrative target; watch Svenskt Näringsliv surveys.</li>
 <li><strong>Rural Gävleborg</strong> — constituency amplification; watch local press coverage.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-source-rating">Source rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-rating"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-rating">Source rating<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-rating"></a></h3>
 <p>Segment sizes from SCB 2025 labour-market tables (A1). 2022 vote splits from Valmyndigheten (A1). Movement projections from cluster base-rate modelling (B2).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-8">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-8">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-8"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM</strong> — segment sizes A1; projected shifts B2 (extrapolated from prior wedge-campaign analogs).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: How comparable jurisdictions treat SME high-sick-pay-cost reimbursement. <strong>Method</strong>: Outside-In comparator analysis per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a>.</p>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany, EU baseline (Nordic + EU minimum).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2325,13 +2325,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table">Comparator table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Equivalent scheme</th><th>Current status</th><th>Employer cost share</th><th>Primary source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden (baseline)</strong></td><td>Ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader (2016–2024)</td><td>Abolished 2024</td><td>Employer bears full sick-pay cost weeks 1–2</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">https://www.regeringen.se/</a> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark</strong></td><td>Sygedagpengerefusion (ongoing)</td><td>In force — employer reimbursed from day 31 (or from day 1 under § 56 agreement for chronically ill workers)</td><td>Employer bears weeks 1–4</td><td><a href="https://www.borger.dk/">https://www.borger.dk/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland</strong></td><td>Sairauspäiväraha (Kela)</td><td>Kela compensates from day 10 onward; SME burden weeks 1–2</td><td>Employer weeks 1–2 only</td><td><a href="https://www.kela.fi/">https://www.kela.fi/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway</strong></td><td>Sykepenger (NAV)</td><td>Employer pays first 16 days, state pays from day 17 — much shorter employer burden than SE</td><td>Employer 16 days</td><td><a href="https://www.nav.no/">https://www.nav.no/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany</strong></td><td>Entgeltfortzahlung + Umlageverfahren U1 (EFZG)</td><td>Mandatory pooling scheme for small firms (&#x3C; 30 employees); state covers up to 80%</td><td>Employer 6 weeks, but U1 pools the SME burden</td><td><a href="https://www.bmas.de/">https://www.bmas.de/</a> (A1)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU average</strong></td><td>Varies</td><td>~7/27 member states operate explicit SME reimbursement; another ~8 have shorter employer windows</td><td>Mixed</td><td>EU-OSHA 2024 report (A1)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-findings">Key findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-findings">Key findings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-findings"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Sweden post-2024 is the Nordic outlier.</strong> All three Nordic comparators maintain an explicit mechanism to shorten or pool SME sick-pay exposure. Denmark, Finland, Norway all cap employer burden in weeks, not month. After 2024, Sweden effectively extends employer-borne cost beyond the Nordic norm.</li>
 <li><strong>Germany's U1 Umlageverfahren</strong> offers a design precedent often cited by Företagarna: mandatory small-firm pooling, 60–80% reimbursement, funded by employer levy. Relevant to HD10447 because it is a "reinstate with a twist" option.</li>
 <li><strong>EU policy trajectory</strong> (European Semester 2025) flags employer sick-pay burden as an SME-productivity factor for several member states — Sweden not yet on that list, but the HD10447 narrative could raise its profile.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447">Lessons applicable to HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447">Lessons applicable to HD10447<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-lessons-applicable-to-hd10447">Lessons applicable to HD10447<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lesson</th><th>Implication</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Nordic Scandinavia maintains some form of SME buffer</td><td>S can frame Sweden as "Nordic outlier"</td></tr><tr><td>German U1 pooling is a revenue-neutral design</td><td>KD/M could propose pooling rather than reinstatement</td></tr><tr><td>Short employer windows (Norway 16 days) are politically stable across left/right governments</td><td>Political risk of abolition is asymmetric — hard to re-establish once removed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-5">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-5">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-5"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TB
   SE[Sweden&#x3C;br/>no SME reimbursement&#x3C;br/>post-2024]
   DK[Denmark&#x3C;br/>refusion from day 31]
@@ -2372,46 +2372,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-5">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style NO fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style DE fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style EU fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-9">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-9">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-9"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH (A1–A2)</strong> — comparator statutes and scheme designs are matter of open public law.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Question</strong>: What past episodes most closely resemble HD10447 + cluster, and what did they predict?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election">Parallel 1 — 2021-22 S wedge campaign on pensioners' tax (pre-2022 election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election">Parallel 1 — 2021-22 S wedge campaign on pensioners' tax (pre-2022 election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2021-22-s-wedge-campaign-on-pensioners-tax-pre-2022-election"></a></h3>
 <p>S coordinated 9 interpellations on pensioners' skatt Jan–May 2022, addressing Finance Minister Damberg and PM Andersson. Pattern: single-signatory, topic-clustered, pre-election. Led to a budget concession on the sänkta skatten för pensionärer.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Direct procedural analog.</li>
 <li><strong>Outcome</strong>: Coalition held; opposition captured narrative; concession made 2 months before election.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: High for narrative-capture, medium for concession (Tidö has less vote slack than the 2021 minority government).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik">Parallel 2 — 2018-19 M campaign on energipolitik<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik">Parallel 2 — 2018-19 M campaign on energipolitik<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-19-m-campaign-on-energipolitik"></a></h3>
 <p>M filed 11 IPs Feb–Jun 2018 on energipolitik ahead of 2018 val, addressing then-minister Baylan (S). Produced narrative traction but no policy change; contributed to 2018 close result.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Same signalling mechanism; opposition party used IPs as narrative tool not legislation tool.</li>
 <li><strong>Outcome</strong>: Narrative win, no policy move.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: Medium — Tidö likely follows Löfven-government pattern of holding line.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested">Parallel 3 — 2024 abolition itself (the policy being contested)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested">Parallel 3 — 2024 abolition itself (the policy being contested)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2024-abolition-itself-the-policy-being-contested"></a></h3>
 <p>The ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader was abolished in the 2024 budget proposition. Tidö argued the scheme was administratively costly relative to its reach. Opposition IPs on the abolition were filed in 2024 Q4 but narrative did not cohere then.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Same actors, same policy, but narrative now being re-activated 18 months later with pre-election framing.</li>
 <li><strong>Outcome then</strong>: Minimal political cost to Tidö.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive implication</strong>: Re-activation with election context materially changes the risk profile.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster">Parallel 4 — 2014 FP (now L) small-business motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster">Parallel 4 — 2014 FP (now L) small-business motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2014-fp-now-l-small-business-motion-cluster"></a></h3>
 <p>Pre-2014 election, FP filed a cluster of motions/IPs on small-business cost pressures. Policy effect near-zero; narrative effect moderate; FP lost ground anyway.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Opposite ideological direction but similar tactic.</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: Narrative alone is not sufficient — must be tied to a broader economic frame.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996">Parallel 5 — German Entgeltfortzahlung debate (1996)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996">Parallel 5 — German Entgeltfortzahlung debate (1996)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--german-entgeltfortzahlung-debate-1996"></a></h3>
 <p>Germany's Kohl government cut sick-pay continuation from 100% to 80% in 1996 — faced mass opposition, partly reversed 1999 after Rot-Grün won. Shows the long shadow of sick-pay policy cuts on a ruling coalition.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Relevance</strong>: Different jurisdiction; same political physics (sick-pay cuts as durable wedge).</li>
 <li><strong>Predictive value</strong>: Medium-long-term — cuts of this type tend to return as election issues for many cycles.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph LR
   P1[2021-22 Pensionärsskatt] -->|narrative+concession| PRES[HD10447 outlook]
   P2[2018-19 Energipolitik] -->|narrative only| PRES
@@ -2424,25 +2424,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-synthesis">Synthesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
   style P3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style P4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style P5 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-net-historical-signal">Net historical signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-historical-signal"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-net-historical-signal">Net historical signal<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-net-historical-signal"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Narrative capture is achievable and consistent across all 5 parallels (high prior).</li>
 <li>Concession is conditional on coalition vote-slack — Tidö has <strong>less</strong> slack than the 2022 Andersson government had → <strong>lower</strong> concession probability.</li>
 <li>Wedge-issue durability across cycles (Parallel 5) argues against treating HD10447 as a one-off.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-10">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-10">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> — parallels 1–3 are directly analogous with well-documented A2 sourcing; parallel 5 is international and loosely analogous.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Subject</strong>: How feasible is partial or full reinstatement of ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader, if a future government chose to do so?</p>
-<h2 id="rm-administrative-readiness">Administrative readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-readiness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-administrative-readiness">Administrative readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-administrative-readiness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Legacy system</strong>: Försäkringskassan administered the scheme 2016–2024. Infrastructure de-commissioned but <strong>not fully dismantled</strong>; code paths and reporting schemas are archived. Reactivation estimate: 6–9 months from political decision to operational payout.</li>
 <li><strong>Data flows</strong>: Arbetsgivardeklaration på individnivå (AGI) already reports sick-pay data monthly; the scheme's threshold check is a database query, not a new data collection.</li>
 <li><strong>Complexity</strong>: LOW — scheme was revenue-checked not behaviour-checked.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-fiscal-readiness">Fiscal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-readiness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-fiscal-readiness">Fiscal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-fiscal-readiness"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2470,13 +2470,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-fiscal-readiness">Fiscal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Design</th><th align="right">Annual cost estimate (2024 SEK)</th><th>Commentary</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Full 2016–2024 design</td><td align="right">~1.7 Mdkr</td><td>Abolished for this reason (budget 2024 motivation)</td></tr><tr><td>Threshold raised (applies only to firms &#x3C; 10 emp)</td><td align="right">~0.9 Mdkr</td><td>Likely "partial review" Scenario 2 output</td></tr><tr><td>Pooling levy (German U1 style)</td><td align="right">~0.4 Mdkr net</td><td>Revenue-neutral at mid-term; administrative cost ~0.1 Mdkr</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Tidö fiscal space in 2025 is tight (overskottsmål under pressure); partial or pooling designs more credible than full reinstatement.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-legal-readiness">Legal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-readiness"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legal-readiness">Legal readiness<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legal-readiness"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Statutory vehicle</strong>: Socialförsäkringsbalken 24 kap. — minor amendment required to reinstate § on reimbursement. Well-understood drafting.</li>
 <li><strong>EU state-aid</strong>: the original scheme was de-minimis-compatible; reinstatement similarly unproblematic under EU 2023/2831.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination with arbetsgivaravgifter</strong>: requires parallel change to SFB 24 kap. to avoid double-compensation.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-political-feasibility-path">Political feasibility path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-feasibility-path"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-feasibility-path">Political feasibility path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-feasibility-path"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   IP[HD10447 IP] --> ANS[2026-05-07 answer]
   ANS -->|status quo| END1[No change]
@@ -2490,7 +2490,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-feasibility-path">Political feasibility path<a class="" ari
   style LAW fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0
   style END1 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style END2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-summary-table">Feasibility summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-summary-table">Feasibility summary table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-summary-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2532,31 +2532,31 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-summary-table">Feasibility summary table<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Score (1-5)</th><th>Commentary</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Administrative</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Legacy scheme; rapid reactivation possible</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal</td><td align="center">2–3</td><td>Tight fiscal space; partial or pooling preferred</td></tr><tr><td>Legal</td><td align="center">5</td><td>Straightforward statutory amendment</td></tr><tr><td>Political (Tidö)</td><td align="center">1</td><td>Very unlikely to choose reinstatement</td></tr><tr><td>Political (red-green)</td><td align="center">4</td><td>Likely to include in 2026 manifesto</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Overall (post-2026 red-green)</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>3.5</strong></td><td>Feasible with partial or pooling design</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-of-botched-implementation">Risk of botched implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-of-botched-implementation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-of-botched-implementation">Risk of botched implementation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-of-botched-implementation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If reinstated hurriedly post-2026 election without clarified thresholds, could cause administrative flux and temporary under-payment of legitimate claims.</li>
 <li>Mitigation: 6-month transition window with legacy parameters.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-11">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-11">Confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-11"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> — administrative and legal feasibility A1–A2; political feasibility B2 (based on polling and manifesto signalling).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Challenge the lead framing via ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses). <strong>Reference</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a> §Red-team.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign">Hypothesis H1 — Coordinated pre-election campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign">Hypothesis H1 — Coordinated pre-election campaign<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1--coordinated-pre-election-campaign"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10447 is part of a deliberate, centrally-coordinated S campaign to build an SME-cost wedge ahead of the September 2026 election.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting</strong>: 12/16 S-filed IPs in 3 weeks; topic clustering; explicit growth-gap framing; single-signer pattern mirrors prior coordinated IP campaigns.</p>
 <p><strong>Contradicting</strong>: No public press tie-in yet; single signatory (not co-signed across S front-bench); no parallel S press release.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing">Hypothesis H2 — Constituency-driven individual filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing">Hypothesis H2 — Constituency-driven individual filing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2--constituency-driven-individual-filing"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10447 is a constituency-driven individual filing by Lundqvist responding to SME owners in Gävleborg, not a party campaign. The cluster pattern is coincidence plus opposition baseline.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting</strong>: Lundqvist has prior SME-labour IPs; no press tie-in; single signer; the "cluster" is plausibly the normal end-of-session S activity peak.</p>
 <p><strong>Contradicting</strong>: Topic density in the cluster (4 labour-policy IPs in 3 weeks) is 4× baseline; similar patterns preceded 2022 and 2018 S campaigns.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture">Hypothesis H3 — Signalling to internal Tidö fracture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture">Hypothesis H3 — Signalling to internal Tidö fracture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3--signalling-to-internal-tidö-fracture"></a></h4>
 <p>HD10447 is primarily aimed not at Tidö as a whole but at exploiting a latent M-KD tension on SME burden. The KD-specific addressee is the signal.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting</strong>: Busch addressed personally (not Svantesson, whose portfolio includes fiscal cost); KD's "<em>företagens parti</em>" branding is most vulnerable; Företagarna lobby alignment.</p>
 <p><strong>Contradicting</strong>: Energy/Industry ministry is the conventional addressee for SME matters regardless of party — the addressee choice is structural, not tactical.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2624,13 +2624,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">H1 (campaign)</th><th align="center">H2 (constituency)</th><th align="center">H3 (KD-fracture)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>12/16 S-filed IPs in 3 weeks</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Single signatory</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Topic clustering across 4 clusters</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>KD-specific addressee</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">++</td></tr><tr><td>No press tie-in (yet)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Growth-gap framing (EU comparative)</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Lundqvist's prior IP portfolio</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Election 5 months out</td><td align="center">++</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Net support</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+7</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+1</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>+5</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Legend: <code>++</code> strong supporting · <code>+</code> weak supporting · <code>0</code> neutral · <code>−</code> contradicting.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-1">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-1">Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-1"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>H1 Coordinated campaign</strong> — strongest fit (net +7). Adopted as working hypothesis.</li>
 <li><strong>H3 KD-fracture signalling</strong> — secondary, consistent with H1 (not mutually exclusive).</li>
 <li><strong>H2 Constituency-driven</strong> — weakest fit; useful as null hypothesis.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Challenge A</strong>: If this were a coordinated campaign we would expect co-signers. Why none?
 <ul>
@@ -2648,18 +2648,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected--logged-alternatives">Rejected / logged alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected--logged-alternatives"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected--logged-alternatives">Rejected / logged alternatives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected--logged-alternatives"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Policy-wonk filing</strong> (Lundqvist raising a wonkish issue irrespective of campaign) — rejected: text framing is overtly political (Sweden-EU growth gap, "den här regeringen").</li>
 <li><strong>Intra-S factional signalling</strong> (left-S pushing economic-populist agenda over centrist) — logged but not supported by current evidence.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-on-outcome">Confidence on outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-on-outcome"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-on-outcome">Confidence on outcome<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-on-outcome"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>MEDIUM-HIGH</strong> that H1 is the dominant hypothesis. Reassess after 2026-05-06 if no press coordination emerges (then shift weight toward H2/H3).</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Method</strong>: 7-dimension political-classification per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md"><code>political-classification-guide.md</code></a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader">HD10447 — Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader">HD10447 — Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2706,14 +2706,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-hd10447--borttagandet-av-ersättningen-för-höga-sjuklönekostnader"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Document type</td><td>Interpellation (IP)</td><td><code>typ=ip</code> in HD10447 metadata (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>2. Policy domain</td><td>Labour market / SME fiscal policy</td><td>Text references <em>sjuklönekostnader</em>, <em>små och medelstora företag</em>, <em>arbetsgivaravgifter</em> (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>3. Political orientation</td><td>Opposition (S) → Government (KD)</td><td>Undertecknare: Patrik Lundqvist (S); ställd till Ebba Busch (KD) (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>4. Conflict intensity</td><td>Medium — reopens a 2024 decision; frames Sweden-vs-EU growth gap</td><td>Text explicitly attributes growth underperformance to the policy (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>5. Urgency</td><td>Routine — SISVA (answer deadline) 2026-05-07</td><td><code>SISVA: 2026-05-07</code> in workflow status (A2)</td></tr><tr><td>6. Public interest</td><td>High — affects ~1.2M SMEs, ~60% of private-sector employment</td><td>SCB företagsstatistik 2024 (A2) <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>7. Election relevance</td><td>High — wedge-ready, 5 months before Sep 2026</td><td>Direct cite of Sweden-vs-EU growth comparison is an electoral-narrative frame (A2)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier">Priority tier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier">Priority tier<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>L2+ Priority</strong> — one tier above default L2 Strategic because:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Reopens a closed 2024 budget decision with quantifiable fiscal footprint (~SEK 1.0–1.5 bn/year).</li>
 <li>Cabinet-level minister personally exposed.</li>
 <li>Pre-election wedge posture.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2740,7 +2740,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Attribute</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Classification</td><td>Public (primary source is data.riksdagen.se, open data)</td></tr><tr><td>GDPR</td><td>Art. 9 special category for <em>political opinion</em> — lawful basis 9(2)(e) publicly made; 9(2)(g) substantial public interest</td></tr><tr><td>Retention</td><td>Keep indefinitely in <code>analysis/daily/</code>; primary source URL is permanent</td></tr><tr><td>Access</td><td>Analysts + public via news pipeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window">Cluster classifications (HD10428–HD10447 window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window">Cluster classifications (HD10428–HD10447 window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2789,7 +2789,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-classifications-hd10428hd10447-window">Cluster classification
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th>Items</th><th>Domain</th><th>Intensity</th><th>Election relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SME-cost economics</td><td>HD10444, HD10447</td><td>Fiscal / labour market</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Labour / social protection</td><td>HD10443, HD10440, HD10446</td><td>Labour, civil</td><td>Low–Med</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Security / policing</td><td>HD10439, HD10430, HD10429, HD10441</td><td>Internal security, rule-of-law</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare</td><td>HD10432, HD10434, HD10442</td><td>Health, regional</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign / diaspora</td><td>HD10435, HD10431</td><td>Foreign, rights</td><td>Low</td><td>Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-6">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-6">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-6"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">graph TD
   HD10447[HD10447&#x3C;br/>S → KD&#x3C;br/>L2+ Priority]
   HD10447 --> D1[Domain&#x3C;br/>Labour / SME fiscal]
@@ -2801,7 +2801,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-6">Visual<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
   style D2 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style D3 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
   style D4 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources-3">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a> (A2, primary)</li>
 <li>SCB företagsstatistik: <a href="https://www.scb.se/">https://www.scb.se/</a> (A2)</li>
@@ -2809,10 +2809,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-sources-2">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Map HD10447 to adjacent policy clusters, legislative chains, and coordinated-activity patterns.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster">SME-cost economics cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster">SME-cost economics cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2840,7 +2840,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-sme-cost-economics-cluster">SME-cost economics cluster<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th><th>Link</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10447</td><td>Borttagandet av ersättningen för höga sjuklönekostnader</td><td>S Lundqvist</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10447.html</a></td></tr><tr><td>HD10444</td><td>Företag som utnyttjar sänkningen av arbetsgivaravgifter</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-22</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD10444.html</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-labour--social-protection-cluster">Labour / social-protection cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-labour--social-protection-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-labour--social-protection-cluster">Labour / social-protection cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-labour--social-protection-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-labour--social-protection-cluster">Labour / social-protection cluster
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10443</td><td>Social dumpning mellan kommuner</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10440</td><td>Utbildningen för företagsläkare</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD10446</td><td>Felaktiga dödförklaringar</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-22</td></tr><tr><td>HD10438</td><td>Nedläggning av kvinnojourer</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr><tr><td>HD10437</td><td>Lönetransparensdirektivet</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-17</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-security--policing-cluster">Security / policing cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security--policing-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-security--policing-cluster">Security / policing cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security--policing-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2920,7 +2920,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-security--policing-cluster">Security / policing cluster<a class="" ar
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10439</td><td>Brist på poliser i Stockholm</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-20</td></tr><tr><td>HD10441</td><td>Rättssäkerheten inom rättsväsendet</td><td>—</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD10430</td><td>Moskéer som sprider hat och hot</td><td>SD</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr><tr><td>HD10429</td><td>Skyddet för yttrandefriheten prop 2025/26:133</td><td>SD</td><td>2026-04-07</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-healthcare--regional-cluster">Healthcare / regional cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-healthcare--regional-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-healthcare--regional-cluster">Healthcare / regional cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-healthcare--regional-cluster"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-healthcare--regional-cluster">Healthcare / regional cluster<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Filer</th><th>Date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD10442</td><td>Ätstörningsvården Region Stockholm</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-21</td></tr><tr><td>HD10432</td><td>Statligt säkerställande vårdbyggnader</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr><tr><td>HD10434</td><td>Bostadsbyggandet Stockholmsregionen</td><td>S</td><td>2026-04-15</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-hd10447">Legislative chain (HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-hd10447"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chain-hd10447">Legislative chain (HD10447)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain-hd10447"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   BP2024[Budget Bill 2023/24&#x3C;br/>abolition of reimbursement] --> EFFECT[Policy in force&#x3C;br/>from 2024-01-01]
   EFFECT --> CRITIQUE[Industry + union&#x3C;br/>concerns 2024-25]
@@ -2963,7 +2963,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chain-hd10447">Legislative chain (HD10447)<a class="" ari
   style HD10447 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
   style ANSWER fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#e0e0e0
   style EL fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00ff88,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-pattern">Coordinated-activity pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-pattern">Coordinated-activity pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-pattern"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3000,12 +3000,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-pattern">Coordinated-activity pattern<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Indicator</th><th>Observation</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S IP volume in HD10428–HD10447 window</td><td><strong>12 of 16</strong> (75%)</td><td>Batch query to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">https://data.riksdagen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>Period</td><td>3 weeks (2026-04-02 → 2026-04-23)</td><td>dok_ids</td></tr><tr><td>Topic diversity</td><td>4 distinct clusters (SME cost, labour, security, healthcare)</td><td>See above</td></tr><tr><td>Baseline (2025/26 session)</td><td>S files ~3 IPs/week on average</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">https://data.riksdagen.se/</a></td></tr><tr><td>Campaign index</td><td>4× baseline in cluster weeks</td><td>Ratio calc</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Propositions folder <code>2026-04-24/propositions/</code> — cross-check for any SME-cost government proposition.</li>
 <li>Budget artefacts — historical reimbursement programme references in <code>analysis/worldbank/</code> and <code>analysis/imf/</code> economic context.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated">External-source references (Admiralty annotated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated">External-source references (Admiralty annotated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3054,9 +3054,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-source-references-admiralty-annotated">External-source refer
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th align="center">Grade</th><th>Use</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>data.riksdagen.se (HD10447 + siblings)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Primary document content &#x26; metadata</td></tr><tr><td>regeringen.se (2024 BP, impact assessment)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Fiscal footprint</td></tr><tr><td>scb.se (företagsstatistik, arbetsmarknad)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>SME count, employment share</td></tr><tr><td>tillvaxtverket.se (rapport 2023:8)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Programme evaluation</td></tr><tr><td>forsakringskassan.se (årsredovisning 2024)</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Administration volume</td></tr><tr><td>oecd.org (Sweden 2023 survey)</td><td align="center">A1</td><td>International benchmarking</td></tr><tr><td>svensktnaringsliv.se / foretagarna.se</td><td align="center">B2</td><td>Industry advocacy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Audit the analytical process itself against ICD 203 and OSINT tradecraft canon; log what worked, what didn't, and concrete improvements.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3113,9 +3113,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ICD 203 standard</th><th>How addressed</th><th>Gap</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Objectivity</td><td>Neutral treatment of S, KD, M, Tidö throughout; devils-advocate.md explicitly scored competing hypotheses</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>2. Independence of political considerations</td><td>No partisan framing; each actor's stance recorded per their stated position</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>3. Timeliness</td><td>Analysis completed within 30 min of agent start; SISVA (2026-05-07) clearly marked</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>4. Sources of all key information</td><td>Per-claim <code>dok_id</code> / URL citations on every ranked row and evidence table</td><td>Some A3 press sources projected for Pass 2 follow-up</td></tr><tr><td>5. Uncertainty</td><td>Confidence labels (VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM-HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW-MEDIUM / LOW) on every Key Judgment; probabilities on scenarios</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>6. Distinguishing intel from assumptions</td><td>Scenario and ACH explicitly separate observed evidence from inference</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>7. Relevance to consumers</td><td>BLUF + 3 Decisions + PIR mapping tied to executive brief</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>8. Logical argumentation</td><td>ACH matrix with explicit net-support scoring; transparent scenario probabilities</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>9. Consistency</td><td>Cross-reference map aligns synthesis, threat, SWOT, risk, scenario, intel-assessment</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-code-usage">Admiralty Code usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-usage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-code-usage">Admiralty Code usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-usage"></a></h3>
 <p>Evidence rated A1–F6 throughout. Primary sources (Riksdagen, Regeringen, Kela, NAV) rated A1–A2. Base-rate extrapolations rated B2–B3. No source below C3 used in Key Judgments.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Techniques applied<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Key Assumptions Check (scenario-analysis.md)</li>
 <li>ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (devils-advocate.md)</li>
@@ -3128,25 +3128,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-applied">Structured Analytic Technique
 <li>What-If / leading-indicator bait (forward-indicators.md)</li>
 <li>Red-team challenge (devils-advocate.md challenges A–C)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-wep--kent-scale-usage">WEP / Kent Scale usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wep--kent-scale-usage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-wep--kent-scale-usage">WEP / Kent Scale usage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wep--kent-scale-usage"></a></h3>
 <p>Probabilities expressed both as percentages (50 / 20 / 20 / 10) and anchored to WEP bands:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>50% → <em>Even chance</em> / <em>Sannolikt</em></li>
 <li>20% → <em>Unlikely</em> / <em>Osannolikt</em></li>
 <li>10% → <em>Very unlikely</em> / <em>Mycket osannolikt</em></li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-what-worked">What worked<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked">What worked<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Batched heredoc writing kept the 30-min PR deadline feasible.</li>
 <li>Using the 29-IP cluster as cluster-context allowed strong H1 framing without over-claiming on a single doc.</li>
 <li>Pre-flight check correctly routed to Analysis mode.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Initial threat-analysis.md heredoc triggered sandbox block on word "kill-chain"; had to rewrite (cost ~60 s).</li>
 <li>Only one date-filtered document for 2026-04-24 required lookback to 2026-04-23 and wider cluster context — acceptable but reduces narrative variety.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Avoid sandbox hot-words</strong>: add a pre-check for banned strings (<code>kill-chain</code>, etc.) before heredoc write.</li>
 <li><strong>Parallelise Family D</strong>: batch 7 Family D files into one multi-heredoc bash call once cluster data is confirmed stable.</li>
@@ -3154,7 +3154,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for
 <li><strong>Earlier Pass 1 snapshot</strong>: snapshot at the 8-file mark rather than 22-file mark to reduce end-of-run risk if deadline approaches.</li>
 <li><strong>Press-source watch list</strong>: add a standing A3-quality comparator to <code>forward-indicators.md</code> so the 2026-05-07 answer auto-triggers a follow-up workflow.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-osint-ethics-check">OSINT ethics check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-osint-ethics-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-osint-ethics-check">OSINT ethics check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-osint-ethics-check"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Only public sources (Riksdagen open data, Regeringen.se, public comparator government data).</li>
 <li>No personal data beyond what MPs and ministers publish in their official capacity (GDPR Art. 9 lawful basis 9(2)(e)).</li>
@@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-osint-ethics-check">OSINT ethics check<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-24 01:36 UTC
 <strong>Data Sources</strong>: get_interpellationer, get_dokument_innehall
 <strong>Documents Downloaded</strong>: 30
@@ -3177,7 +3177,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <code>analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> and using templates
 from <code>analysis/templates/</code>.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-counts-by-type"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
@@ -3187,9 +3187,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-counts-by-type">Document Counts by Type<a class="" aria-hidd
 <li><strong>questions</strong>: 0 documents</li>
 <li><strong>interpellations</strong>: 30 documents</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data Quality Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <h2 id="rm-all-documents-sourced-from-official-riksdag-regering-mcp-apidata-sourced-from-2026-04-23-via-lookback-fallback--check-freshness-indicators">All documents sourced from official riksdag-regering-mcp API.
 Data sourced from 2026-04-23 via lookback fallback — check freshness indicators.<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-all-documents-sourced-from-official-riksdag-regering-mcp-apidata-sourced-from-2026-04-23-via-lookback-fallback--check-freshness-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/documents/HD10447-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10447-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3235,7 +3262,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:12.128Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:33.677Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html b/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html
index f616d8d835..20553a80bc 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V,">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.283Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.825Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.283Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:33.825Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V,","description":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 20 counter-motions against 9 Tidö-government propositions — a coordinated legislative response concentrated in three…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:12.283Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024078-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024081-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024083-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024084-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024085-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024088-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024093-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024094-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V,","description":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 20 counter-motions against 9 Tidö-government propositions — a coordinated legislative response concentrated in three…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:33.825Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024078-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024081-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024083-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024084-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024085-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024088-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024093-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024094-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed <strong>20 counter-motions</strong> against <strong>9 Tidö-government propositions</strong> — a coordinated legislative response concentrated in three utskott (FiU/SfU/SoU) and anchored on the drivmedelsbudget (prop 2025/26:236, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>). <strong>Sverigedemokraterna filed zero counter-motions</strong>, preserving complete Tidö-bloc discipline. The wave telegraphs 2026-election positioning: S owns the fiscal-climate axis; V owns the distributional axis; MP owns the vapenexport axis; C owns the procedural-reform axis; SD stays silent.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial priority ranking</strong> — Lead coverage on drivmedel cluster (3 motions, election-salient), secondary on utvisning cluster (rule-of-law) and vapenexport (foreign-policy cleavage).</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition-signal tracking</strong> — Log that S has <em>not</em> joined MP on the vapenexport motion (HD024096 vs absent S counterpart). This is a load-bearing red-green scenario constraint for 2026 government formation.</li>
 <li><strong>Forecast update</strong> — Raise probability of Tidö bills passing substantially unchanged from baseline 65% → 72%. SD's zero-motion posture removes the only plausible right-flank defection path on migration/justice.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-bullets">60-second bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-bullets">60-second bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scale</strong>: 20 motions / 72 hours / 9 propositions / 6 utskott. <strong>Admiralty B2</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>Battleground</strong>: Drivmedelsbudget (prop 236) is the single hottest file — S (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>), V (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>) and MP (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>) all filed.</li>
@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-bullets">60-second bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Centre track</strong>: C filed on 5 bills (prop 215, 216, 222, 223, 229, 235) but consistently motions for procedural tightening rather than rejection — positioning for bourgeois-curious voters.</li>
 <li><strong>Regering risk</strong>: FiU vote on drivmedelspaket is the most likely outcome to generate floor-visible dissent; the coalition retains the arithmetic but opposition will use the debate for election-cycle framing.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top forward trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top forward trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p>📍 <strong>Watch</strong>: FiU's betänkande timeline on prop 2025/26:236 — if reported out before 2026-06-01, drivmedel becomes the defining pre-summer political narrative. If delayed into autumn, S's framing hardens and coalition cohesion faces stress on fuel-tax permanence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--decision-landscape">Mermaid — decision landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--decision-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--decision-landscape">Mermaid — decision landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--decision-landscape"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Start([20 motions filed&#x3C;br/>2026-04-15/17]) --> Cluster{Cluster by propagent}
@@ -267,13 +267,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--decision-landscape">Mermaid — decision landscape<a class="
 <p><strong>Full analysis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md">synthesis-summary.md</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md">intelligence-assessment.md</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md">risk-assessment.md</a></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: The four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) have filed a <strong>coordinated counter-motion wave</strong> of 20 motions against 9 Tidö-government propositions in a 72-hour window (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17). The dominant battleground is the Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (prop 236) drivmedelsskatt, attracting motions from all three left-bloc parties (S/V/MP). The wave is concentrated in three utskott — <strong>FiU</strong> (economy), <strong>SfU</strong> (migration), <strong>SoU</strong> (health) — mirroring the salience hierarchy heading into the 2026 election. Sverigedemokraterna's complete absence from the counter-motion set is the single most structurally revealing signal: SD remains fully Tidö-aligned, foreclosing any opposition-from-right scenario on these bills.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>DIW tier</th><th>Why it matters</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>HD024082 (S)</td><td>L3</td><td>S-partiets motion mot drivmedelsbudget — largest opposition party on the single most election-salient economic measure (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>HD024098 (MP)</td><td>L2+</td><td>MP: avslag drivmedelsbudget — climate counter-narrative anchor (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>HD024092 (V)</td><td>L2+</td><td>V: avslag drivmedelsbudget — distributional counter-framing (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>HD024090 (V)</td><td>L2+</td><td>V: avslag utvisning vid brott — rule-of-law flashpoint (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>HD024096 (MP)</td><td>L2+</td><td>MP: förbud export av krigsmateriel — foreign-policy divergence (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>HD024097 (MP)</td><td>L2</td><td>MP: avslag utvisning p.g.a. brott (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>HD024089 (C)</td><td>L2</td><td>C: mottagandelag — municipal economic aid (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>HD024078 (S)</td><td>L2</td><td>S: brottsofferlag — rights framework (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>HD024081 (S)</td><td>L2</td><td>S: medicinsk kompetens — 12 kap. avslag (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>HD024093 (C)</td><td>L2</td><td>C: cybersäkerhetscenter — institutional design (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Ranking robust under ±1 tier perturbation — drivmedel cluster remains top by weight-of-evidence regardless of scoring adjustment. Rank sensitivity is formalised in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>The counter-motion flow decomposes into four behaviour signatures:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Coordinated trilateral (S/V/MP)</strong> on Tidö budget (prop 236) and Tidö justice/migration package (prop 235, prop 215, prop 229, prop 222). <strong>Admiralty: B2</strong> (usually reliable open-source confirmed by cross-party filing pattern).</li>
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a cl
 <li><strong>Centre-track reform-not-reject</strong> by C across five bills (215, 216, 222, 223, 229, 235) — C consistently motions for procedural tightening rather than outright avslag. Signals C's positioning as the "responsible alternative" for bourgeois-curious voters. <strong>Admiralty: B2</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>SD silence</strong> — zero counter-motions from SD despite SD being the largest party by 2022 vote share and formal non-member of Tidö government. Full coalition discipline intact. <strong>Admiralty: A1</strong>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-area-heat-map">Policy-area heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-area-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-area-heat-map">Policy-area heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-area-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     A[Prop 236&#x3C;br/>Drivmedelsbudget] -->|3 motions: S,V,MP| B(FiU — top salience)
@@ -377,14 +377,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-area-heat-map">Policy-area heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style L fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style N fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style P fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments-preview">Key judgments preview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-preview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments-preview">Key judgments preview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-preview"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KJ-1 [HIGH]</strong>: The S-led drivmedel counter-motion (HD024082) positions S as the fiscal anchor of a potential red-green coalition in 2026 — S frames the regeringsproposition not as a tax cut but as a climate-policy regression.</li>
 <li><strong>KJ-2 [HIGH]</strong>: The MP vapenexport motion (HD024096) creates a narrow but durable left-bloc cleavage — S has not filed a parallel motion, preserving S's Nato-era defence-industry consensus with M/KD.</li>
 <li><strong>KJ-3 [MEDIUM]</strong>: SD silence on prop 235 (utvisning) indicates SD consents to the Tidö formulation; no right-flank pressure for harsher language, meaning the Regering's immigration package faces no right-critique.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Full judgments, uncertainty and drivers → <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>. Forward triggers → <code>forward-indicators.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Headline (EN)</strong>: "Opposition Files 20-Motion Counter-Wave Against Tidö Budget, Justice Package"</li>
 <li><strong>Headline (SV)</strong>: "Oppositionen svarar med 20 motioner mot Tidö-budget och rättspaket"</li>
@@ -394,36 +394,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <hr>
 <p><em>Sources: riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code> (2026-04-24T01:05:50Z); all dok_id verifiable at data.riksdagen.se.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Opposition filed <strong>20 motions across 9 Tidö bills in 3 days (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17)</strong>, with <strong>zero SD counter-motions</strong>. The pattern reveals disciplined Tidö support on the government side and fragmented-but-parallel opposition on the other. Tidö retains procedural majority (176/349 seats); passage of most bills intact is the most likely outcome (~55%), but election-cycle amplification makes the motion content a narrative-shaping instrument for 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact">KJ-1 — Tidö discipline remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact">KJ-1 — Tidö discipline remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>high confidence</strong> (Admiralty B2) that Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L = 176/349) will deliver all 9 Tidö bills to floor vote in 2026-05/06 with coalition parties voting Ja.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: Zero SD counter-motions in this wave; Tidö has passed every prior legislative package 2022–2026.
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: High (consistent evidence, long baseline).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-2 (coalition discipline).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified">KJ-2 — Opposition coordination is parallel, not unified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified">KJ-2 — Opposition coordination is parallel, not unified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>moderate confidence</strong> (B3) that opposition (S/V/MP/C) remains structurally fragmented; the 2.2 motions/bill density reflects parallel filings, not coordinated opposition.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: No co-signed motions; divergent framing (S fiscal-anchor, V distributional, MP ethical, C reform). Four-party convergence only on prop 216 healthcare.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Moderate (evidence consistent with null hypothesis also — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a>).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-4 (opposition bloc dynamics).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience">KJ-3 — Drivmedel cluster has highest 2026 electoral salience<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience">KJ-3 — Drivmedel cluster has highest 2026 electoral salience<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>moderate confidence</strong> (B3) that the prop 236 / drivmedel cluster (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>) will dominate post-summer 2026 election discourse.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: Three-party opposition convergence; SCB fuel-price indicators trending; rural/urban distributional cleavage aligned with existing S/V/MP base-building.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Moderate (economic-voting literature supports; salience depends on further ECB / oil-price trajectory).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-1 (election 2026 salience).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability">KJ-4 — Prop 216 is the bill with highest amendment probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability">KJ-4 — Prop 216 is the bill with highest amendment probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>low-moderate confidence</strong> (C3) that prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens — healthcare workforce) faces the highest probability of substantial amendment due to the four-party wave (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>) incl. C offering reform path.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: Only bill in the wave with opposition across all four opposition parties; SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner) has standing interest in kommun-sector workforce policy and may weigh in.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Low-Moderate (depends on SKR stance).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-3 (healthcare policy implementation risk).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis">KJ-5 — MP vapenexport framework opens new opposition axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis">KJ-5 — MP vapenexport framework opens new opposition axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>low confidence</strong> (C4) that MP motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a> (ethical vapenexport framework) represents a durable new opposition axis that could fragment opposition further in 2026.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: First substantive MP policy on defence-industry ethics in current mandatperiod; differentiates MP from S (silent) and V (softer framing); creates wedge with defence industry + Nato-alignment camp.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Low (single data point; dependent on media uptake).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-5 (foreign policy positioning).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-level-calibration">Confidence-level calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-level-calibration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-level-calibration">Confidence-level calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-level-calibration"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     KJ1[KJ-1 Tidö discipline&#x3C;br/>High B2] --> Assess([Overall&#x3C;br/>Moderate confidence])
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-level-calibration">Confidence-level calibration<a class=""
     style KJ3 fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style KJ4 fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style KJ5 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs">Priority Intelligence Requirements (standing PIRs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs">Priority Intelligence Requirements (standing PIRs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong> — Does the drivmedel issue gain >5% public salience by summer 2026? (SCB / Novus surveys.)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong> — Does SD publicly dissent on any Tidö bill before floor vote? (Press monitoring.)</li>
@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs">Priority Intelligen
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong> — Does any Tidö party abstain on ändringsbudget vote for prop 236? (Kammarvote record.)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong> — Does V or MP receive +1% in next Novus following utvisning debate? (Polling.)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-caveats">Analytic caveats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-caveats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-caveats">Analytic caveats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-caveats"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Motion-filing ≠ floor-vote outcome; all judgments are probabilistic.</li>
 <li>Baseline motion-density series (2018–2025) would strengthen KJ-2; flagged for acquisition (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a>).</li>
 <li>No classified sources used; all dok_ids verifiable on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-dissemination">Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dissemination"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dissemination">Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dissemination"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary audience: political analysts, journalists, policy researchers.</li>
 <li>Handoff: Next daily brief incorporates updates from utskott hearings.</li>
@@ -463,9 +463,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-dissemination">Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <p><em>ICD 203 standards applied: clear key judgments, explicit confidence, sourcing, caveats, alternative considered (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a>).</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>DIW (Dimension · Intensity · Weight) composite scoring per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a>. Composite = Political (30%) + Fiscal (20%) + Legal (15%) + Distributional (15%) + International (10%) + Electoral (10%).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions">Ranking table (all 20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions">Ranking table (all 20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -787,13 +787,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions">Ranking table (all 20 motions)<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Party</th><th>Cluster</th><th align="right">Pol</th><th align="right">Fiscal</th><th align="right">Legal</th><th align="right">Dist</th><th align="right">Intl</th><th align="right">Elect</th><th align="right">DIW</th><th>Tier</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>HD024082</td><td>S</td><td>drivmedel</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">10</td><td align="right"><strong>8.05</strong></td><td>L3</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>HD024098</td><td>MP</td><td>drivmedel</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right"><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>HD024092</td><td>V</td><td>drivmedel</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right"><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>HD024096</td><td>MP</td><td>krigsmateriel</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">10</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>6.10</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>HD024090</td><td>V</td><td>utvisning</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>MP</td><td>utvisning</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>5.35</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>HD024089</td><td>C</td><td>mottagandelag</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>5.65</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>HD024091</td><td>V</td><td>krigsmateriel</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>5.00</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>HD024081</td><td>S</td><td>medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right"><strong>5.65</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>HD024078</td><td>S</td><td>ersättningsregler</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.95</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">11</td><td>HD024093</td><td>C</td><td>cybersäkerhet</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>4.60</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">12</td><td>HD024087</td><td>MP</td><td>mottagandelag</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.90</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">13</td><td>HD024095</td><td>C</td><td>utvisning</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.45</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">14</td><td>HD024079</td><td>S</td><td>bosättning</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>5.05</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">HD024079</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">15</td><td>HD024086</td><td>MP</td><td>bosättning</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.55</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">HD024086</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">16</td><td>HD024083</td><td>V</td><td>medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.60</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">17</td><td>HD024094</td><td>C</td><td>medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.30</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">18</td><td>HD024085</td><td>MP</td><td>ersättningsregler</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>3.95</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">HD024085</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">19</td><td>HD024084</td><td>V</td><td>ersättningsregler</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>3.95</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">HD024084</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">20</td><td>HD024088</td><td>C</td><td>konsumentkredit</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>3.80</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Weight perturbation (±5% on each axis)</strong>: Top-5 ranking stable. HD024096 (krigsmateriel) rank sensitivity: drops to 6 if International weight reduced to 5%, rises to 3 if weighted 15%.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier cut-off (DIW ≥ 7.0 = L2+)</strong>: Three documents qualify — all three drivmedel motions. Robust finding.</li>
 <li><strong>Party-balance audit</strong>: Scores do not systematically favour any bloc — top-3 are S (1), MP (1), V (1). Audit trail in <code>methodology-reflection.md §Party neutrality arithmetic</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution">Mermaid — DIW tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution">Mermaid — DIW tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Significance — Political vs Electoral axis
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution">Mermaid — DIW tier distribution<a c
     "HD024089 C mottag [5.65]": [0.55, 0.6]
     "HD024081 S med kompet [5.65]": [0.65, 0.6]
     style HD024082 fill:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-notes">Methodology notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-notes">Methodology notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scale</strong>: Each axis 1–10. Weights documented in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Composite formula</strong>: <code>DIW = 0.30·Pol + 0.20·Fiscal + 0.15·Legal + 0.15·Dist + 0.10·Intl + 0.10·Elect</code>.</li>
@@ -822,9 +822,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-notes">Methodology notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><em>Evidence: every row cites a verifiable <code>dok_id</code> resolvable via <code>get_dokument</code>. Source: riksdag-regering MCP.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Analyses anticipated media framing across Swedish outlets for the 9-bill + 20-motion cluster.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet">Expected framing by outlet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet">Expected framing by outlet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet">Expected framing by outlet<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>Orientation</th><th>Likely frame</th><th>Evidence-framed motion</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DN — Dagens Nyheter</td><td>Centre-liberal</td><td>"Tidö pressar igenom — opposition splittrad"</td><td>All bills; emphasis on coordination failure</td></tr><tr><td>SvD — Svenska Dagbladet</td><td>Centre-right</td><td>"Oppositionen ger sig på reformagendan"</td><td>Focus on prop 216, prop 235</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet</td><td>Social-democratic</td><td>"S tar fighten om drivmedel"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td>Expressen</td><td>Liberal-populist</td><td>"Asylpolitiken delar kammaren"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, prop 235</td></tr><tr><td>SR Ekot / SVT Rapport</td><td>Public-service neutral</td><td>Balanced per-bill coverage</td><td>All clusters</td></tr><tr><td>ETC</td><td>Vänster</td><td>"V kräver rättvisa — utvisning hård kritik"</td><td>V motions cluster</td></tr><tr><td>Riks / Samhällsnytt</td><td>SD-aligned</td><td>"Tidö håller linjen mot alla motstånd"</td><td>Zero SD motions as strength</td></tr><tr><td>Fokus</td><td>Nyhetsmagasin</td><td>Analys av Tidö-dynamiken</td><td>Cross-cluster</td></tr><tr><td>DI — Dagens Industri</td><td>Näringsliv-orienterat</td><td>"Vapenexportsystemet under tryck — MP motion"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-cluster-map">Frame cluster map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-cluster-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-cluster-map">Frame cluster map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-cluster-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Gov([Government success frame]) --> GovM[DN SvD Fokus]
@@ -908,32 +908,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-cluster-map">Frame cluster map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style Tactics fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Content fill:#8338ec,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style Wedge fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster">Framing vectors by motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-drivmedel-prop-236">Drivmedel (prop 236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-drivmedel-prop-236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster">Framing vectors by motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-drivmedel-prop-236">Drivmedel (prop 236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-drivmedel-prop-236"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mobiliserande frame</strong> (S/V/MP): "Tidö väljer biltrafik över klimat" / "Skattesänkning på bekostnad av rurala vårdbehov"</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse frame</strong> (Tidö): "Sänkta drivmedelspriser hjälper vanliga familjer"</li>
 <li><strong>Neutral frame</strong> (SR): "Budget-effekten av drivmedelsänkningen — 2.5 mdkr"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-utvisning-prop-235">Utvisning (prop 235)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-utvisning-prop-235"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-utvisning-prop-235">Utvisning (prop 235)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-utvisning-prop-235"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mobiliserande frame</strong> (V/MP): "Rättssäkerheten urholkas" / "Europas hårdaste utvisningslag"</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse frame</strong> (Tidö/SD): "Tidö levererar svensk asylreform"</li>
 <li><strong>Neutral frame</strong>: "Vad ändras konkret? Juridisk analys"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228">Krigsmateriel (prop 228)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228">Krigsmateriel (prop 228)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>MP-frame</strong>: "Etisk kontroll av svenska vapen" (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>)</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse</strong>: "Försvarsindustrin viktig för svensk säkerhet"</li>
 <li><strong>Neutral</strong>: "Nuvarande kontrollsystem — hur fungerar det?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216">Medicinsk kompetens (prop 216)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216">Medicinsk kompetens (prop 216)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>4-partsfronten</strong>: "Sällsynt enighet mot regeringens reform"</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse</strong>: "Snabb behandling av vårdpersonalbristen"</li>
 <li><strong>Kommunsektor-frame</strong>: "SKR bekymrad över finansiering"</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-social-media-framing-predictions">Social-media framing predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-framing-predictions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-social-media-framing-predictions">Social-media framing predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-framing-predictions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -975,14 +975,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-social-media-framing-predictions">Social-media framing predictions<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Platform</th><th>Expected framing dynamic</th><th>Amplification risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>X (Twitter)</td><td>Polarisering; dok_id-citations of motions; hashtag #Tidöfalls vs #Tidöholder</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Facebook</td><td>Longer-form opinion in voter groups; rural vs urban split on drivmedel</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Instagram</td><td>Civil-society mobilisering on utvisning, climate</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>TikTok</td><td>Generationsfrågor on housing, drivmedel, migration</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>LinkedIn</td><td>Näringsliv perspective on vapenexport, cybersäk</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td>Telegram</td><td>Konspirationsnarrativ risk on migration bills</td><td>Medium-High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-war-indicators">Frame-war indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-war-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-war-indicators">Frame-war indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-war-indicators"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Who defines "obstruction"</strong>: Tidö frames 20 motions as opposition obstruction; opposition frames as democratic oversight.</li>
 <li><strong>Who owns "drivmedel"</strong>: S fiscal-anchor frame vs Tidö "familjeekonomi" frame — contested.</li>
 <li><strong>Who owns "rättssäkerhet"</strong>: V/MP civil-rights frame vs Tidö "rättssäker utvisning" frame — contested.</li>
 <li><strong>SD frame absent</strong>: SD does not frame this wave; absence itself is a frame Tidö exploits as "disciplinerat stöd".</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism">Editorial recommendations (for riksdagsmonitor journalism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism">Editorial recommendations (for riksdagsmonitor journalism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Identify each motion by dok_id in every article — avoid generic "opposition motion".</li>
 <li>Explain extra ändringsbudget procedure on prop 236 in plain language.</li>
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism">Editorial r
 <li>Do not over-claim "opposition coordination" — evidence supports parallel filing more than unified strategy.</li>
 <li>Give MP vapenexport framework its own dedicated explanation — underreported axis.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist">Counterspin and balance checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist">Counterspin and balance checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>✓ Name every primary author by party</li>
 <li>✓ Link every dok_id to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a></li>
@@ -1002,9 +1002,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist">Counterspin and balance checklist<
 <hr>
 <p><em>Media framing predictions based on historical outlet patterns 2014–2025. No individual journalist targeting — outlet-level orientation only.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Six-lens stakeholder analysis. Lenses: <strong>Government coalition</strong>, <strong>Opposition bloc</strong>, <strong>Business/industry</strong>, <strong>Civil society</strong>, <strong>Voters/regional</strong>, <strong>Foreign/EU</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-matrix">Stakeholder matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-matrix">Stakeholder matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-matrix">Stakeholder matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Interest</th><th align="right">Power</th><th>Position</th><th>Named actor(s)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Regering (M-KD-L)</strong></td><td>Pass 9 bills intact</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Defend Tidö package</td><td>Ulf Kristersson (M) PM; finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Tidö-avtal; <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Tidö support)</strong></td><td>Lock in Tidö; prepare 2026</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Silent support; no counter-motions</td><td>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</td><td><code>get_motioner</code> result (0 SD)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Election-cycle positioning; fiscal anchor</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Constructive counter on fiscal; silent on vapenexport</td><td>Mikael Damberg (S) finansp; Ardalan Shekarabi (S) migration; Fredrik Lundh Sammeli (S) SoU; Joakim Järrebring (S) CU</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">HD024079</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Distributional justice; civil rights</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Full avslag on welfare/utvisning bills</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar (V) ordf; Tony Haddou (V) migration; Håkan Svenneling (V) UU; Karin Rågsjö (V) SoU; Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez (V) CU</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">HD024084</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Climate; foreign-policy ethics</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Avslag fiscal; full vapenexport ban; rule-of-law</td><td>Janine Alm Ericson (MP); Jacob Risberg (MP); Annika Hirvonen (MP); Ulrika Westerlund (MP); Leila Ali Elmi (MP)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">HD024086</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">HD024085</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Centrist reform; procedural tightening</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Reform-not-reject on 5 bills</td><td>Christofer Bergenblock (C) SoU; Alireza Akhondi (C) CU; Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) SfU/FöU; Mikael Larsson (C) FöU</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Defence industry</strong></td><td>Export clarity</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Oppose MP ban (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>)</td><td>SOFF (Säkerhets- och försvarsföretagen), Saab</td><td><a href="https://soff.se/">soff.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Klimatnätverk / civil society</strong></td><td>Back fuel-tax protection</td><td align="right">Low-Medium</td><td>Support MP/V motions</td><td>Klimatriksdagen, Naturskyddsföreningen</td><td><a href="https://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/">naturskyddsforeningen.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Kommunsektor (SKR)</strong></td><td>Fiscal certainty on kommun-vård</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Neutral-to-worried on prop 216</td><td>SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)</td><td><a href="https://skr.se/">skr.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rural voters</strong></td><td>Fuel-price relief</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Favour prop 236 regardless of opposition</td><td>—</td><td>SCB KPI rural (<a href="https://www.scb.se/">scb.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Migration-sector civil society</strong></td><td>Counter utvisning regime</td><td align="right">Low-Medium</td><td>Ally with V/MP on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td><td>Röda Korset, Amnesty Sverige</td><td><a href="https://www.amnesty.se/">amnesty.se</a>, <a href="https://www.rodakorset.se/">rodakorset.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU (Commission, Member States)</strong></td><td>Compatibility of utvisning with ECHR/EU law</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Silent-monitoring</td><td>DG Home; Nordic partners</td><td><a href="https://ec.europa.eu/">ec.europa.eu</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media ecosystem</strong></td><td>Stories for election cycle</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Amplify drivmedel, utvisning, krigsmateriel</td><td>DN, SvD, SR, SVT</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-interestpower-grid">Interest/Power grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interestpower-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-interestpower-grid">Interest/Power grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interestpower-grid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Stakeholder Interest × Power
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-interestpower-grid">Interest/Power grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     "Migration CS": [0.70, 0.35]
     "EU": [0.50, 0.70]
     "Media": [0.65, 0.65]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     Tidö([Regering M-KD-L]) -->|coalition| SD
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style V fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style MP fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style C fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-winners-and-losers">Winners and losers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners-and-losers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winners-and-losers">Winners and losers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners-and-losers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1245,9 +1245,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-winners-and-losers">Winners and losers<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <hr>
 <p><em>Every named actor is a public officeholder or public-interest organisation. GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) — data made manifestly public by data subjects.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgments from this analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22">Near-term indicators (next 4 weeks, 2026-04-24 → 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22">Near-term indicators (next 4 weeks, 2026-04-24 → 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22">Near-term i
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Trigger date</th><th>Source</th><th>Updates KJ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>First utskott hearing on prop 236 scheduled</td><td>First FiU calendar entry</td><td>+7d (~2026-05-01)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/finansutskottet</a></td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>SD public comment on any Tidö bill</td><td>First press release from SD press office</td><td>+14d (~2026-05-08)</td><td><a href="https://sverigedemokraterna.se/">sverigedemokraterna.se</a></td><td>KJ-1, H3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>SKR formal comment on prop 216</td><td>First published brief on healthcare workforce</td><td>+14d (~2026-05-08)</td><td><a href="https://skr.se/">skr.se</a></td><td>KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>First kammardebatt on prop 236</td><td>Scheduled kammardebatt</td><td>+21d (~2026-05-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se calendar</a></td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>SOFF response to MP vapenexport framework</td><td>First public statement</td><td>+21d (~2026-05-15)</td><td><a href="https://soff.se/">soff.se</a></td><td>KJ-5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17">Mid-term indicators (4–12 weeks, 2026-05-22 → 2026-07-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17">Mid-term indicators (4–12 weeks, 2026-05-22 → 2026-07-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17">Mid-term indica
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Trigger date</th><th>Source</th><th>Updates KJ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>FiU betänkande on prop 236 published</td><td>Betänkande publication</td><td>+5 weeks (~2026-05-29)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/FiU</a></td><td>KJ-1, KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>SfU betänkande on prop 235</td><td>Publication</td><td>+6 weeks (~2026-06-05)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/socialforsakringsutskottet/">riksdagen.se/SfU</a></td><td>KJ-1</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>SoU betänkande on prop 216</td><td>Publication (looking for amendment language)</td><td>+6 weeks (~2026-06-05)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/socialutskottet/">riksdagen.se/SoU</a></td><td>KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>Kammarvote on prop 236</td><td>Final ja/nej/avstår count</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/arende/">riksdagen.se voteringar</a></td><td>KJ-1, KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>Kammarvote on prop 235</td><td>Final count</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se voteringar</a></td><td>KJ-1</td></tr><tr><td align="right">11</td><td>Kammarvote on prop 216</td><td>Final count + any amendment</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se voteringar</a></td><td>KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="right">12</td><td>Any Tidö MP abstain on ändringsbudget vote</td><td>Single abstention</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td>Kammarvote record</td><td>KJ-1, S3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13">Long-term indicators (12+ weeks, toward 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13">Long-term indicators (12+ weeks, toward 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13">Long-term indicators
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Trigger date</th><th>Source</th><th>Updates KJ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">13</td><td>Novus/Demoskop issue-salience update on drivmedel</td><td>Drivmedel in top 3 voter issues</td><td>~2026-07-31</td><td>Polling publications</td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">14</td><td>S party congress economic platform</td><td>Fiscal-anchor framing of drivmedel motion</td><td>2026-08-15 (est.)</td><td><a href="https://www.socialdemokraterna.se/">socialdemokraterna.se</a></td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">15</td><td>Almedalen vecka party speeches</td><td>Motion content incorporation</td><td>2026-07-06..2026-07-12</td><td>Almedalens programme</td><td>KJ-3, KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td align="right">16</td><td>MP vapenexport framework — policy paper</td><td>Formal MP manifesto language</td><td>2026-08-15 (est.)</td><td><a href="https://www.mp.se/">mp.se</a></td><td>KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td align="right">17</td><td>Election 2026-09-13 result</td><td>Final seat distribution</td><td>2026-09-13</td><td><a href="https://www.val.se/">val.se</a></td><td>All KJs</td></tr><tr><td align="right">18</td><td>Post-election coalition formation</td><td>Regering formed / fails</td><td>2026-09..2026-10</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a></td><td>Scenario set</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-trigger-response-mapping">Trigger-response mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-response-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-trigger-response-mapping">Trigger-response mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-response-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-trigger-response-mapping">Trigger-response mapping<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>If indicator fires</th><th>Expected action (next analysis pipeline)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>#2 SD breaks silence</td><td>Elevate H3 to Moderate; re-score scenarios</td></tr><tr><td>#3 SKR formal concern</td><td>Upgrade KJ-4 to Moderate-High</td></tr><tr><td>#9 prop 236 passes intact</td><td>Confirm KJ-1; reduce S2 probability</td></tr><tr><td>#9 prop 236 fails</td><td>Upgrade S3 scenario to dominant; major re-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>#11 prop 216 amendment passes</td><td>Confirm KJ-4; validate 4-party coordination hypothesis</td></tr><tr><td>#12 Tidö abstention</td><td>Immediate triage; S3 scenario update</td></tr><tr><td>#17 L below 4%</td><td>Trigger post-election coalition re-analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-coverage">PIR coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-coverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-coverage">PIR coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-coverage"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-coverage">PIR coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Covered by indicators</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1 Election 2026 salience</td><td>#13, #14, #15, #17</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2 SD coalition discipline</td><td>#2, #12, #9/10/11</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3 Healthcare implementation</td><td>#3, #8, #11</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4 Opposition bloc dynamics</td><td>#6, #7, #8, #15</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5 Foreign policy positioning</td><td>#5, #16</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6 Procedural integrity</td><td>#9, #12</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7 Polling shift</td><td>#13</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-update-cadence">Update cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-update-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-update-cadence">Update cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-update-cadence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Next full re-run: 2026-05-15 (after 3 weeks of indicator data).</li>
 <li>Interim spot-check: +7d (first utskott calendar entry).</li>
@@ -1524,9 +1524,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-update-cadence">Update cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <p><em>All 18 indicators have concrete dates or conditions + public verifiable sources. Forward-looking ≠ predictive.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Three futures for the 9 Tidö bills (prop 214, 215, 216, 222, 223, 228, 229, 235, 236) given the motion wave. Probabilities sum to 100%.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-overview">Scenario overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-overview">Scenario overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-overview">Scenario overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="right">Probability</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 — Tidö holds, bills pass intact</td><td align="right">55%</td><td align="center">Moderate (Admiralty B2)</td><td>60–90 days</td></tr><tr><td>S2 — Partial amendment, 2 bills fall</td><td align="right">30%</td><td align="center">Moderate (B3)</td><td>60–90 days</td></tr><tr><td>S3 — Coalition stress, extra-budget vote fails</td><td align="right">15%</td><td align="center">Low (C3)</td><td>60–180 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-s1--tidö-holds-55">S1 — Tidö holds (55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--tidö-holds-55"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-s1--tidö-holds-55">S1 — Tidö holds (55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--tidö-holds-55"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: All 9 bills adopted with minor utskott amendments. Tidö 176/349 seats prove durable despite fragmented opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Indicators (watch list)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-s1--tidö-holds-55">S1 — Tidö holds (55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Election 2026 runs on completed Tidö record.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Tidö discipline across 2025–2026 (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>); zero SD counter-motions on this wave (dok_id manifest).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-s2--partial-amendment-30">S2 — Partial amendment (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--partial-amendment-30"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-s2--partial-amendment-30">S2 — Partial amendment (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--partial-amendment-30"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: 2 of 9 bills substantially amended or withdrawn. Likely candidates: prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens — 4-party wave incl. C) and prop 236 (drivmedel — fiscal amplification).</p>
 <p><strong>Indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-s2--partial-amendment-30">S2 — Partial amendment (30%)<a class="" a
 <li>Tidö survives but at narrative cost entering 2026 campaign.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: C filed 5 motions including reform-not-reject on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>; 4-party convergence on prop 216.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15">S3 — Coalition stress / extra-budget fails (15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15">S3 — Coalition stress / extra-budget fails (15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget route used for prop 236 fails; at least one Tidö party abstains. Triggers ordningsfråga and possible förtroendeomröstning.</p>
 <p><strong>Indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15">S3 — Coalition stress
 <li>MP/V gain mobilisation headroom.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Historical pattern — minority+support coalitions rarely complete without 1 stress event per mandatperiod. Tidö has been unusually stable 2022–2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-tree">Decision tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-tree">Decision tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Now([2026-04-24&#x3C;br/>20 motions filed]) --> UtskHear[Utskott hearings&#x3C;br/>May 2026]
@@ -1622,13 +1622,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-tree">Decision tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     style S1Path fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style S2Path fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style S3Path fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario probability distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario probability distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 pie title Scenario probabilities (sum = 100%)
     "S1 Tidö holds" : 55
     "S2 Partial amendment" : 30
     "S3 Coalition stress" : 15</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find">Early-warning indicators (F3EAD Disseminate → Find)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find">Early-warning indicators (F3EAD Disseminate → Find)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1681,9 +1681,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find">Early-warning indic
 <p><em>Probabilities are analyst judgements with documented evidence; horizon 60–180 days to kammarvote + förordnand. Bayesian update recommended after each utskott hearing.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Five-dimension risk register. <strong>L</strong> = Likelihood (1–5), <strong>I</strong> = Impact (1–5), <strong>R</strong> = L × I.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1800,20 +1800,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk description</th><th align="right">L</th><th align="right">I</th><th align="right"><strong>R</strong></th><th>Evidence</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-1</td><td>Political</td><td>Tidö passes prop 236 (drivmedel) substantially unchanged; opposition narrative loss locked in before summer</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>16</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, Tidö seat math 176/349 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td><td>Opposition pre-commits to budget-reversal commitment in 2026 manifesto</td></tr><tr><td>R-2</td><td>Political</td><td>V full-avslag on utvisning (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>) gets framed as "soft on crime" during election</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>12</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td><td>V pivots to proportionality/EU-law frame; coordinates with MP/C rule-of-law emphasis</td></tr><tr><td>R-3</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Committee backlog: 9 propositions + 20 motions in 6 utskott = congestion; betänkanden slip into autumn</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>9</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a> (FöU), <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a> (SoU)</td><td>Utskott-chair prioritisation; FiU gets lead track</td></tr><tr><td>R-4</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Drivmedel tax cut blows budget anchor; S's constructive-reform framing (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) vindicated</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>12</strong></td><td>SCB statsfinansiellstatistik (<a href="https://www.scb.se/">scb.se</a>), KPI fuel indices</td><td>Konjunkturinstitutet scenario modelling cited in June debate</td></tr><tr><td>R-5</td><td>Corruption/Integrity</td><td>None detected in current motion wave — low background risk</td><td align="right">1</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right"><strong>2</strong></td><td>—</td><td>Standard Riksdagsreg hygiene</td></tr><tr><td>R-6</td><td>Foreign/Strategic</td><td>MP krigsmateriel motion (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>) gets instrumentalised in disinformation re: Swedish Nato commitment</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>8</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a></td><td>Clear MP messaging distinguishing ethical export policy from Nato alignment</td></tr><tr><td>R-7</td><td>Electoral</td><td>SD silence + Tidö discipline raises Tidö incumbent advantage above model baseline</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Zero SD motions filed (<code>get_motioner</code> result 2026-04-24)</td><td>S-V-MP-C coordinate manifest content before Almedalen 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R-8</td><td>Distributional</td><td>Fuel tax cut is regressive for ecology but progressive for commuters; opposition argues both and risks contradiction</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>9</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a> (MP), <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a> (V)</td><td>Separate climate argument (MP) from distributional argument (V); avoid blending</td></tr><tr><td>R-9</td><td>Legal</td><td>Utvisning regime (prop 235) produces ECHR-compatibility challenge; rapid LR case</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>8</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a> Motivering, prop 235</td><td>Reserve analysis for betänkande hearing; cite MR-expert testimony</td></tr><tr><td>R-10</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget procedure compresses debate time → reduces opposition visibility</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>9</strong></td><td>FiU calendar, prop 236 special-budget route</td><td>Demand extended debate; file ordningsfråga</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading-risk chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in">Chain A — Drivmedel narrative lock-in<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading-risk chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in">Chain A — Drivmedel narrative lock-in<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>R-1 (prop 236 passes) → R-4 (fiscal-anchor frame) → R-7 (Tidö incumbent advantage) → 2026 result
 </code></pre>
 <p>If R-1 materialises without effective opposition counter-framing, R-4 and R-7 compound. <strong>Posterior probability chain passes</strong>: 0.70 × 0.55 × 0.60 ≈ <strong>0.23</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame">Chain B — Utvisning rule-of-law frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame">Chain B — Utvisning rule-of-law frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>R-2 (V framed soft on crime) → R-9 (ECHR challenge surfaces late) → 2027 judicial correction
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Posterior</strong>: 0.55 × 0.25 × 0.40 ≈ <strong>0.055</strong>. Low but election-relevant if V response is slow.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift">Chain C — Foreign policy drift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift">Chain C — Foreign policy drift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>R-6 (MP krigsmateriel instrumentalised) → S-MP alignment breach → post-election coalition failure
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Posterior</strong>: 0.30 × 0.40 × 0.35 ≈ <strong>0.042</strong>. Non-negligible for 2026 government formation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map">Heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map">Heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk heat map — Likelihood × Impact
@@ -1834,7 +1834,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map">Heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
     "R-9 ECHR": [0.40, 0.80]
     "R-10 extra-budget compression": [0.60, 0.60]
     style R-1 fill:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian">Posterior-probability update (Bayesian)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian">Posterior-probability update (Bayesian)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian"></a></h3>
 <p>Prior <code>P(Tidö bills pass substantially unchanged) = 0.65</code> (structural coalition math).
 Likelihood observations:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian">Posterior-probability update (
 <li>Extra-budget procedural route → raise posterior
 Posterior <code>P(pass | observations) ≈ 0.72</code>. Distribution: 72% pass substantially unchanged, 18% pass with marginal amendment, 6% significant amendment, 4% withdrawal or replacement.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-3-actionable-risks">Top 3 actionable risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-actionable-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-actionable-risks">Top 3 actionable risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-actionable-risks"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R-1</strong> (R=16): Drivmedel narrative lock-in — highest combined score.</li>
 <li><strong>R-2</strong> (R=12): V soft-on-crime frame — reputational risk for V coalition value.</li>
@@ -1852,8 +1852,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-3-actionable-risks">Top 3 actionable risks<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><em>Evidence standard: all scores substantiated by at least one <code>dok_id</code> or primary-source URL. Cross-reference → <code>threat-analysis.md</code> for adversary-perspective complement.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-swot-grid">Executive SWOT grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-swot-grid"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-executive-swot-grid">Executive SWOT grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-swot-grid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Opposition SWOT — Internal vs External
@@ -1869,43 +1869,43 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-swot-grid">Executive SWOT grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     "Elect cleavage Tidö permanence": [0.80, 0.85]
     "SD Tidö lock-in": [0.80, 0.25]
     "Coalition math 349 seats": [0.85, 0.20]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis">S-1 · Coordinated trilateral framing on fiscal axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis">S-1 · Coordinated trilateral framing on fiscal axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis"></a></h4>
 <p>Three left-bloc parties simultaneously filed motions against prop 2025/26:236 within 48 hours — S (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>), V (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>), MP (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>). Evidence: temporal clustering (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17), all filed in same utskott (FiU). Demonstrates operational coordination capacity for 2026 campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor">S-2 · S positions as fiscal anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor">S-2 · S positions as fiscal anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor"></a></h4>
 <p>S under Mikael Damberg (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) proposes constructive alternative rather than pure avslag — institutional competence signalling for 2026 government-formation credibility. Evidence: motion text calls for regeringen to "återkomma till riksdagen" with revised framework rather than rejecting outright.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly">S-3 · MP owns climate and vapenexport axes cleanly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly">S-3 · MP owns climate and vapenexport axes cleanly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly"></a></h4>
 <p>MP is the only party filing on prop 228 (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>) with a full export-ban proposition — gives MP unique ownership of two election-relevant frames (climate via drivmedel, ethics via vapenexport). Evidence: no parallel S or V motion proposing full ban.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile">S-4 · C differentiated centre-reform profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile">S-4 · C differentiated centre-reform profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile"></a></h4>
 <p>C filed on 5 distinct propositions (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a>) with consistently procedural/reform language — maintains C as a non-Tidö bourgeois alternative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame">W-1 · Absence of coordinated judicial-policy counter-frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame">W-1 · Absence of coordinated judicial-policy counter-frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame"></a></h4>
 <p>Opposition filed 3 motions on prop 235 (utvisning) but with fundamentally divergent lines: V wants full avslag (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>), MP wants partial avslag (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>), C wants systematik-krav (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a>). This is three parallel messages, not one — weakens narrative cohesion.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport">W-2 · S silence on vapenexport<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport">W-2 · S silence on vapenexport<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport"></a></h4>
 <p>S filed zero motions against prop 228 (krigsmateriel). Leaves MP (and partly V) to carry the line alone. A red-green coalition scenario requires S-MP alignment on foreign policy; this divergence will be used by Tidö parties in 2026 campaign framing.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare">W-3 · No cross-bloc bridge on welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare">W-3 · No cross-bloc bridge on welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare"></a></h4>
 <p>Three motions on prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens) from S/V/C — but no sign of coordinated amendment package. Opposition is parallel, not integrated. Evidence: three distinct utskott filings with different legal pathways.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling">W-4 · Limited full-text signalling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling">W-4 · Limited full-text signalling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling"></a></h4>
 <p>All 20 motions retrieved as metadata-only summaries at retrieval time; deeper textual coordination (wording overlap, shared legal analysis) cannot be verified at this resolution. Pass-2 remediation: prioritise <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> for P0/P1 documents in next run.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg">O-1 · Election-cycle narrative peg<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg">O-1 · Election-cycle narrative peg<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg"></a></h4>
 <p>Drivmedel is Sweden's most-polled cost-of-living issue in 2026 (SCB KPI-F fuel indices persistently salient). The S motion (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) can anchor a broader oppositions-own-the-economy narrative through summer.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235">O-2 · Rule-of-law debate on prop 235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235">O-2 · Rule-of-law debate on prop 235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235"></a></h4>
 <p>Three opposition motions (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>) collectively put proportionality/legal-certainty back on the agenda — creates coverage window for constitutional-committee (KU) scrutiny lines in opposition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026">O-3 · Coalition demarcation for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026">O-3 · Coalition demarcation for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026"></a></h4>
 <p>The motion wave crystallises the S-V-MP-C quartet's distinct positions. Election debates can now reference concrete differentiation rather than abstract positioning.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility">O-4 · Committee-work visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility">O-4 · Committee-work visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility"></a></h4>
 <p>With 6 different utskott touched (FiU, UU, SoU, SfU, CU, AU, FöU), opposition gains recurring media moments throughout the betänkande calendar — each utskott report surfaces the opposition line separately.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact">T-1 · Tidö arithmetic remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact">T-1 · Tidö arithmetic remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact"></a></h4>
 <p>M (68 seats) + SD (73) + KD (19) + L (16) = 176 seats vs 173-seat opposition. Motion wave does not alter coalition math. Evidence: Riksdag seat distribution 2022 baseline. <strong>Admiralty A1</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure">T-2 · SD lock-in removes right-flank pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure">T-2 · SD lock-in removes right-flank pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p>SD filed zero motions against any of the 9 propositions. This means there is no realistic path to Tidö amendment from internal-coalition dissent. Full base available via <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/voteringlista/?rm=2025/26">search_voteringar</a>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters">T-3 · Drivmedel tax cut is popular even among opposition voters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters">T-3 · Drivmedel tax cut is popular even among opposition voters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters"></a></h4>
 <p>KPI trend since 2022 makes fuel-price relief broadly popular. Opposition avslag position risks class-cleavage backlash (rural/commuter vs urban). The V full-avslag line (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>) carries distributional risk.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative">T-4 · Parallel bill flow crowds out narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative">T-4 · Parallel bill flow crowds out narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p>The 9 propositions in one 72-hour motion window dilute media attention per bill — drivmedel may dominate, but prop 216 (kommun-vård) risks being under-covered.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings">TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings">TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1942,7 +1942,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings">TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Leverage for</th><th>Exploit by</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 × O1</td><td>S fiscal anchor + election narrative</td><td>S lead-story positioning on drivmedel; op-ed programme through May</td></tr><tr><td>S3 × O2</td><td>MP vapenexport + rule-of-law debate</td><td>MP as civil-liberties party bridges foreign-policy and domestic constitutionalism</td></tr><tr><td>W1 × T4</td><td>Divergent utvisning lines + narrative crowding</td><td>Risk: opposition self-dilutes on justice; requires unified spokesperson</td></tr><tr><td>S4 × O3</td><td>C differentiated + coalition demarcation</td><td>C targets bourgeois-curious M/L voters who reject SD but approve of Tidö economics</td></tr><tr><td>W2 × T2</td><td>S silence on vapenexport + SD lock-in</td><td>S's silence ensures Tidö defence-industry consensus holds regardless of MP pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S/W pairing</strong>: S-1 (trilateral coord) is real only on fiscal; W-1 (divergent justice) shows it does not generalise. Coordination is issue-specific, not structural.</li>
 <li><strong>S/O</strong>: S-3 (MP clean ownership) × O-3 (coalition demarcation) strengthens a multi-party Left narrative where each party has a distinct role.</li>
@@ -1952,10 +1952,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <p><em>Evidence standard: every entry cites either a dok_id or primary-source URL. Source: riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code> 2026-04-24T01:05:50Z.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: HIGH · <strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH (T-4, T-7) / MEDIUM (T-1, T-2, T-3, T-5) / LOW (T-6) · <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (B2 — multi-source motion-wave pattern, plausibility judgements per row).</p>
 <p>This analysis adopts the Political Threat Taxonomy — adversarial actors, techniques, and targets that could exploit or undermine the democratic process around this motion wave. <strong>This is NOT political opposition research</strong>; it is threat modelling against democratic legitimacy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Actor class</th><th>Technique</th><th>Target</th><th align="right">Plausibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T-1</td><td>Foreign influence (state-linked)</td><td>Frame V avslag on utvisning (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>) as state-capture narrative</td><td>V voter base / centre swing</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-2</td><td>Foreign influence</td><td>Amplify MP krigsmateriel (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>) to depict Sweden as unreliable Nato ally</td><td>Nato discourse in Sweden + allies</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-3</td><td>Domestic extremist</td><td>Weaponise prop 235 debate to mobilise anti-migrant mobilisation</td><td>Public order / community safety</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-4</td><td>Disinformation (platform)</td><td>Mischaracterise S drivmedel motion (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) as endorsing higher fuel tax</td><td>Rural/commuter voters</td><td align="right">High</td></tr><tr><td>T-5</td><td>Legitimate political (within rules)</td><td>Tidö parties frame coordinated motion wave as "obstruction" to legitimise procedural shortcuts</td><td>Democratic debate norms</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-6</td><td>Cyber</td><td>Attempt to compromise Riksdag.se delivery of motion documents during debate window</td><td>Information integrity</td><td align="right">Low</td></tr><tr><td>T-7</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Utskott-chair use of extra-budget procedure (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">prop 236</a> FiU route) to compress opposition time</td><td>Deliberative quality</td><td align="right">High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel">Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo on drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel">Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo on drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Goal([Erode S credibility on fuel prices]) --> A[Mischaracterise HD024082]
@@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel">Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo o
     style Impact fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style A fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style B fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel">Kill chain — T-2 (Nato-alliance framing on krigsmateriel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel">Kill chain — T-2 (Nato-alliance framing on krigsmateriel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     R[Reconnaissance&#x3C;br/>Identify MP motion HD024096] --> W[Weaponisation&#x3C;br/>Selective translation to EN]
@@ -2051,7 +2051,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel">Kill chain 
 
     style R fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Ob fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-style TTP mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-style TTP mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-style TTP mapping<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Procedure (observed / plausible)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TA-Info-Manip</td><td>Selective quotation</td><td>Crop S motion to omit "återkomma till riksdagen" qualifier</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> text structure</td></tr><tr><td>TA-Delegitimise</td><td>Frame substitution</td><td>Label V avslag as "amnesti"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td></tr><tr><td>TA-Polarise</td><td>Issue wedge</td><td>Rural vs urban on drivmedel</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td></tr><tr><td>TA-Amplify</td><td>Bot / coordinated inauthentic</td><td>Reshare cycles on X/Facebook during utskott hearings</td><td>riksdagen.se calendar</td></tr><tr><td>TA-Suppress</td><td>Procedural compression</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget route (prop 236)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> FiU timeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking">Adversary goals &#x26; cost/impact ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking">Adversary goals &#x26; cost/impact ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Threat ranking — Plausibility vs Impact
@@ -2111,14 +2111,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking">Adversary goals &#x26; cost/impa
     "T-5 obstruction frame": [0.60, 0.60]
     "T-6 cyber Riksdag": [0.20, 0.80]
     "T-7 procedural compression": [0.85, 0.65]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-defensive-recommendations">Defensive recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-defensive-recommendations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-defensive-recommendations">Defensive recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-defensive-recommendations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Against T-4</strong>: S and V independently publish plain-language explainers of their drivmedel motions within 72 hours of first debate; cite <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> and <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a> directly.</li>
 <li><strong>Against T-2</strong>: MP coordinates with Swedish embassy comms on English-language explanation of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>, distinguishing ethical-export framework from Nato alignment.</li>
 <li><strong>Against T-7</strong>: Opposition files ordningsfråga at extra-budget procedural votes; document compression in KU annual report.</li>
 <li><strong>Against T-3</strong>: Coordination with MSB (Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap) on monitoring extremist mobilisation around prop 235 debate windows (<a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a>).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-residual-threat-posture">Residual threat posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-threat-posture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-residual-threat-posture">Residual threat posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-threat-posture"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>High-plausibility / high-impact quadrant: T-4, T-2, T-7.</li>
 <li>Watch list next 30 days: platform-level content around drivmedel and utvisning debates.</li>
@@ -2128,17 +2128,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-residual-threat-posture">Residual threat posture<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p><em>This document models adversarial threats to democratic process around the motion wave — it is not an assessment of any specific party's motives. Source: threat framework + riksdag-regering MCP.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024078">HD024078<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024078"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024078-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024078 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion demanding broader kommun-sektor consultation before any reform to medicinsk legitimationsprocess. Flags risk that the Tidö proposition moves too fast without workforce-pipeline data.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-inferred">Key yrkanden (inferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-inferred"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-inferred">Key yrkanden (inferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-inferred"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Kommunsektor-samråd must precede final utformning.</li>
 <li>Socialstyrelsen kapacitet måste bekräftas.</li>
 <li>Begär återkomma till riksdagen med förslag.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW score</strong>: 6.8 (high — 4-party wave context)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / implementation risk / P1</li>
@@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><strong>Implementation risk</strong>: High for prop 216 overall (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination signal</strong>: Part of 4-party wave with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md">HD024083</a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md">HD024087</a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md">HD024094</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Low probability of motion passage standalone; high influence on betänkande amendment text.</li>
 <li>Narrative value for S: fiscal-ansvarsfull + kommun-sektor ansvar framing.</li>
@@ -2154,24 +2154,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code> (riksdag-regering MCP).</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024079">HD024079<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024079"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024079 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: UU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 228 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion on proposed amendments to the swedish arms-export regime (prop 228). S frames as pragmatic support with amendment; not a ban.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Utvidgad transparens.</li>
 <li>ISP-kapacitet måste säkerställas.</li>
 <li>Återrapportering till UU årligen.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-1">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-1">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.2 (med-high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Defence / foreign-policy / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: S positions between MP ethical framework and Tidö status quo — centre-pragmatic.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination signal</strong>: Three-party cluster with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md">HD024091</a> (V) and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md">HD024096</a> (MP) — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Motion likely to be absorbed into betänkande as minority reservation.</li>
 <li>Clarifies S–MP policy distance.</li>
@@ -2179,48 +2179,48 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024080">HD024080<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024080"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024080 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024080.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: AU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 222 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion seeking amendments to ersättningsregler in prop 222. Focus on pensioner/sickness-benefit integrity.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-1">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-1">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-1"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Mildare trappor vid långvarig sjukfrånvaro.</li>
 <li>Administrativ förenkling.</li>
 <li>Bevaka pensionärsinkomst.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-2">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-2">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 4.1 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / labour / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: Targets segment E (pensioners, 22% of electorate, S-strong).</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md">HD024086</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Moderate salience; stable S-base motion.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024081">HD024081<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024081"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024081-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024081 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 235 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion with rättssäkerhets-amendments to prop 235 utvisning reform. Not an avslag; a technical reform motion.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-2">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-2">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-2"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Domstolsprövning-tillgång måste säkerställas.</li>
 <li>Tidsramar för överklaganden rimliga.</li>
 <li>ECHR-kompatibilitet bekräftas.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-3">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-3">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.5 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / rule-of-law / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: S centrist positioning — accepts Tidö hardening framework but amends implementation.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md">HD024090</a> V full avslag and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md">HD024097</a> MP reform.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Distinguishes S from both Tidö and V on this axis.</li>
 <li>Retains centre-right swing voter potential.</li>
@@ -2228,18 +2228,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024082 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: FiU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 236 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lead motion of the entire wave.</strong> S positions as fiscal-anchor — challenges extra ändringsbudget-finansieringen för drivmedel-reduktion utan tydlig motsvarande besparing.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-3">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-3">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-3"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Riksdagen begär regeringens fullständiga finansieringsförslag.</li>
 <li>FiU måste granska makroekonomisk effekt.</li>
 <li>Extra ändringsbudget-proceduren ifrågasätts.</li>
 <li>Återkomma till riksdagen.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-4">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-4">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 8.4 (highest in wave)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Fiscal / macroeconomic / P0</li>
@@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis-4">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <li><strong>Electoral relevance</strong>: Segment A (rural, 18%) + E (pensioners, 22%) = 40% of electorate mobilisation potential (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md">voter-segmentation.md</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Lead of 3-party cluster with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md">HD024092</a> (V) + <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md">HD024098</a> (MP).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-4">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-4">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Highest 2026 electoral salience of any single motion in the wave.</li>
 <li>Procedural challenge to ändringsbudget route creates S3 scenario trigger.</li>
@@ -2256,24 +2256,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-4">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>. Primary campaign-narrative document.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024083">HD024083<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024083"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024083-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024083 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion calling for avslag on prop 216 absent funded workforce pipeline; argues the reform erodes kommun-sector capacity.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-4">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-4">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-4"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Riksdagen avslår prop 216.</li>
 <li>Begär återkomma med finansierat förslag.</li>
 <li>Kommunsektor-ekonomisk analys krävs.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-5">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-5">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.4 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / implementation risk / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: V base mobilisation on public-sector worker rights.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Part of <strong>4-party wave</strong> on prop 216 with S/MP/C — strongest coordination of entire motion wave.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-5">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-5">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Binary avslag position; differs from S amendment approach.</li>
 <li>Raises SoU betänkande amendment probability.</li>
@@ -2281,115 +2281,115 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-5">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024084">HD024084<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024084"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024084-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024084 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: CU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 223 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion demands stricter konsumentskydd än prop 223 som drafted; specifically högre räntetak and stricter marknadsföringsförbud.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-5">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-5">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-5"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Lägre räntetak än regeringens förslag.</li>
 <li>Marknadsföringsförbud för snabblån.</li>
 <li>Förstärkt Konsumentverket-tillsyn.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-6">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-6">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 4.4 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Consumer protection / civil rights / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with C <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md">HD024088</a> — 2-party.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-6">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-6">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Technical policy motion; low campaign salience but stable V-base signal.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024085">HD024085<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024085"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024085-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024085 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: FöU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 214 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion on prop 214 cyber reform — adds privacy/civil-liberty dimensions to cybersäkerhetsreformen.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-6">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-6">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-6"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Integritetsskydd måste balansera NIS2-implementering.</li>
 <li>PTS-tillsyn oberoende.</li>
 <li>Medborgarrättsligt perspektiv i utformning.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-7">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-7">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.8 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Cyber / civil rights / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with C <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md">HD024095</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-7">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-7">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Niche but differentiating; positions MP on civil-liberties axis.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024086">HD024086<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024086"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024086 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: AU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 222 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion on ersättningsreformen; adds jämställdhets- and miljö-dimensioner till arbetslöshets-/sjukersättning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-7">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-7">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-7"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Jämställd utformning av trappor.</li>
 <li>Omställningsstöd i klimatomställning ska ingå.</li>
 <li>Återkomma med förslag.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-8">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-8">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-8"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.9 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / labour / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 2-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md">HD024080</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-8">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-8">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-8"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Moderate salience; differentiates MP on klimat+omställning integration.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024087">HD024087<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024087"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024087 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion mot prop 216 — kräver klimatkompetens-integration i hälso- och sjukvårdsutbildning; betonar jämlikhet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-8">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-8">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-8"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Klimatkompetens i utbildningsreformen.</li>
 <li>Regional jämlik tillgång.</li>
 <li>Icke-diskriminering i legitimationsprocess.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-9">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-9">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-9"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 4.8 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / climate integration / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: <strong>4-party wave</strong> with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md">HD024078</a>, V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md">HD024083</a>, C <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md">HD024094</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-9">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-9">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-9"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Specialised angle; contributes to wave coordination signal but unique framing.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024088">HD024088<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024088"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024088-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024088 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: CU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 223 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion med reform-inte-avslag stance på prop 223 — fokus på småföretagens kreditgivning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-9">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-9">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-9"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>SME-anpassning av regelverket.</li>
 <li>Digital tillsyn.</li>
 <li>Utvärdering efter 24 månader.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-10">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-10">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-10"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.6 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Consumer / SME / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 2-party with V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md">HD024084</a> — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-10">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-10">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-10"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Positioning: centre-reform, not oppositionell avslag.</li>
 <li>Part of C 5-motion differentiation strategy.</li>
@@ -2397,23 +2397,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-10">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024089">HD024089<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024089"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024089 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 229 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på kommunal ersättningsnivå i prop 229 mottagandelag — krever kommunkompensation vid kapacitetskrav.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-10">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-10">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-10"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Full kommunersättning.</li>
 <li>Regional fördelningsmekanism.</li>
 <li>SKR-samråd före ikraftträdande.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-11">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-11">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-11"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 5.4 (medium-high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / kommun economy / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Solo C motion (no other party matches).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-11">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-11">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-11"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Plays kommunsektor-expertise card — C's traditional strength.</li>
 <li>Links mottagandelag to <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md">HD024094</a> (healthcare workforce) thematically.</li>
@@ -2421,23 +2421,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-11">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024090">HD024090<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024090"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024090 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 235 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h3>
 <p>V full avslag på prop 235 — ECHR-kompatibilitet ifrågasatt, rättssäkerhetsrisk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-11">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-11">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-11"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Riksdagen avslår prop 235 i sin helhet.</li>
 <li>Begär ECHR-analys.</li>
 <li>Rättspraxis-sammanställning.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-12">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-12">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-12"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 7.2 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / human-rights / P0</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md">HD024081</a>, MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md">HD024097</a> — <strong>divergent</strong> (S amendment vs V avslag vs MP reform).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-12">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-12">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-12"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Maximal differentiation V vs Tidö on migration.</li>
 <li>Mobilises V base but may alienate swing voters.</li>
@@ -2445,46 +2445,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-12">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024091">HD024091<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024091"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024091 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: UU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 228 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h3>
 <p>V full avslag på prop 228 — vapenexport-liberalisering avvisas principiellt.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-12">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-12">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-12"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Avslag.</li>
 <li>Översyn av svensk vapenexportpolicy.</li>
 <li>UN Arms Trade Treaty-stärkning.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-13">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-13">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-13"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.8 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Defence / foreign-policy / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md">HD024079</a>, MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md">HD024096</a> — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-13">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-13">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-13"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V-base signal on pacifism + anti-imperialist framing.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024092">HD024092<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024092"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024092 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: FiU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 236 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktionen — begär förstärkt kollektivtrafik i stället.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-13">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-13">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-13"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Avvisning av drivmedels-reduktionsprincipen.</li>
 <li>Motförslag: förstärkt regional kollektivtrafik.</li>
 <li>Klimatskatteprincip bevaras.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-14">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-14">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-14"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 7.6 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Fiscal / climate / P0</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md">HD024082</a> lead + MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md">HD024098</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-14">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-14">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-14"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V differentierar sig från S finanspolitisk framing → klimatmoralisk framing.</li>
 <li>Urban segment (D, 20%) mobilisation potential.</li>
@@ -2492,46 +2492,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-14">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024093">HD024093<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024093"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024093-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024093 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: TU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 215 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på digitaliseringsreformen — fokus på rural bredbandsutbyggnad och SME-access.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-14">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-14">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-14"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Geografisk jämlikhet i utrullning.</li>
 <li>SME-skräddarsydda e-tjänster.</li>
 <li>PTS-rapportering per kvartal.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-15">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-15">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-15"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.3 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Digital / regional / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Solo C motion.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-15">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-15">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-15"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Rural-voter positioning (segment A overlap).</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024094">HD024094<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024094"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024094-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024094 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på prop 216 — regional jämlik tillgång, SKR-samråd, kommunekonomisk analys.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-15">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-15">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-15"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Regional tillgänglighet.</li>
 <li>SKR-samråd.</li>
 <li>Kommunersättning vid ny capacitetsförfrågan.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-16">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-16">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-16"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 5.0 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / kommun / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: <strong>4-party wave</strong> with S/V/MP — strongest coordination signal of the wave.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-16">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-16">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-16"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>C sätter kommun-sektor expertise-stämpel på wave.</li>
 <li>Lägger grunden till SoU betänkande-amendment.</li>
@@ -2539,92 +2539,92 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-16">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024095">HD024095<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024095"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024095 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: FöU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 214 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på prop 214 cybersäkerhet — SME-fokus + implementation cost.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-16">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-16">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-16"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>SME-anpassning av NIS2.</li>
 <li>Implementeringskostnad till små företag begränsad.</li>
 <li>Utvärdering efter 24 månader.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-17">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-17">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-17"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.1 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Cyber / SME / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 2-party with MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md">HD024085</a> — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-17">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-17">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-17"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Low salience; stable reform-framing signature C pursues.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024096">HD024096<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024096 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: UU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 228 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-18">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-18">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-18"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion på prop 228 vapenexport — etisk ramverks-amendment, klimatdimension.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-17">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-17">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-17"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Etisk ramverk före export-liberalisering.</li>
 <li>Klimatsäkerhetsperspektiv integreras.</li>
 <li>Demokratiklausul stärks.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-18">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-18">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-18"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 5.8 (medium-high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Defence / ethics / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md">HD024079</a>, V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md">HD024091</a> — divergent.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-18">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-18">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-18"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Distinguishes MP on etisk/klimat integration.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024097">HD024097<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024097"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024097 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 235 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-19">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-19">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-19"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion på prop 235 — reform-ansats, ECHR-kompatibilitet säkerställs, humanitära hänsyn.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-18">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-18">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-18"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>ECHR-analys.</li>
 <li>Humanitära skyddsregler.</li>
 <li>Återkomma med reformerat förslag.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-19">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-19">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-19"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.4 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / human-rights / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md">HD024081</a>, V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md">HD024090</a> — divergent.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-19">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-19">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-19"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Positions MP mellan S amendment och V avslag.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024098">HD024098<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024098"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024098 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: FiU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 236 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-20">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-20">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-20"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktion — klimat-principiell avslag.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-19">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-19">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-19"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Avslag på drivmedelsreduktionen.</li>
 <li>Klimatpolitiska ramverket försvaras.</li>
 <li>Istället: utvidgad bidrag till omställningen.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-20">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-20">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-20"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 7.2 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Fiscal / climate / P0</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md">HD024082</a> lead + V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md">HD024092</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-20">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-20">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-20"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>MP mobiliserar segment D (urban climate) mot Tidö.</li>
 <li>Central klimatnarrativ inför 2026.</li>
@@ -2632,9 +2632,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-20">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>. Part of highest-salience 3-motion cluster.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>The motion wave of 2026-04-24 lands ~4.5 months before the Swedish parliamentary election of 2026-09-13. This analysis maps motion content to 2026 campaign axes.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion">Electoral landscape pre-motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion">Electoral landscape pre-motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2696,7 +2696,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion">Electoral landscape pre-motion<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">2022 result</th><th align="right">Trend (Novus avg Q1 2026)</th><th>Trajectory</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">30.3%</td><td align="right">30–32%</td><td>Stable-up</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">19.1%</td><td align="right">17–19%</td><td>Stable-down</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">20.5%</td><td align="right">21–23%</td><td>Stable-up</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">6.7%</td><td align="right">8–10%</td><td>Up</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">6.7%</td><td align="right">4–5%</td><td>Down (risk under 4% threshold)</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">5.3%</td><td align="right">4–6%</td><td>Stable</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">5.1%</td><td align="right">4–5%</td><td>Stable (threshold risk)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">4.6%</td><td align="right">3–4%</td><td>Down (threshold risk)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Source: aggregate of publicly reported Novus/Demoskop/Ipsos; April 2026.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave">Campaign axes activated by motion wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave">Campaign axes activated by motion wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fiscal / cost-of-living</strong> — drivmedel cluster (prop 236) mobilises rural/commuter vote.</li>
 <li><strong>Migration / rule-of-law</strong> — utvisning cluster (prop 235) mobilises centre-right identity vote + V/MP civil-rights base.</li>
@@ -2705,7 +2705,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave">Campaign axes activated by mo
 <li><strong>Civil rights / cyber</strong> — prop 214 creates smaller axis but differentiates MP/C.</li>
 <li><strong>Social policy / protection of vulnerable</strong> — ersättning (prop 222) + konsumkredit (prop 223) mobilise welfare-sensitive voters.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix">Motion-to-vote translation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix">Motion-to-vote translation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix">Motion-to-vote translation matrix<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion cluster</th><th>Voter segment targeted</th><th>Expected net effect (party)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Drivmedel</td><td>Rural, commuter</td><td>+0.5 to +1.0% S (fiscal anchor)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a></td></tr><tr><td>Drivmedel</td><td>Young urban climate</td><td>+0.3 to +0.5% MP, V</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning</td><td>Civil-society aligned</td><td>+0.3 to +0.5% V, MP</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning</td><td>Tidö base</td><td>Consolidation, ±0 net</td><td>Tidö bills</td></tr><tr><td>Medicinsk kompetens</td><td>Kommun-vårdsektor</td><td>+0.5 to +1.0% S</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td>Krigsmateriel</td><td>Ethical-foreign-policy voters</td><td>+0.2 to +0.4% MP</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td></tr><tr><td>Cybersäk</td><td>Reform-centre voters</td><td>+0.1 to +0.2% C</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-sensitivity">Seat-projection sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-sensitivity">Seat-projection sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2828,14 +2828,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-sensitivity">Seat-projection sensitivity<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario (Sep 2026)</th><th align="right">S</th><th align="right">M</th><th align="right">SD</th><th align="right">V</th><th align="right">C</th><th align="right">KD</th><th align="right">MP</th><th align="right">L</th><th align="right">Tidö total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Base (current polls)</td><td align="right">111</td><td align="right">64</td><td align="right">82</td><td align="right">33</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">11</td><td align="right">175</td></tr><tr><td>Motion-amplified opposition +1% S,V,MP</td><td align="right">115</td><td align="right">62</td><td align="right">80</td><td align="right">36</td><td align="right">14</td><td align="right">17</td><td align="right">16</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">168</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel-price salience +2% S, −1% M</td><td align="right">120</td><td align="right">60</td><td align="right">81</td><td align="right">33</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">14</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">167</td></tr><tr><td>Migration salience +1.5% SD, −1% S</td><td align="right">108</td><td align="right">63</td><td align="right">87</td><td align="right">32</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">11</td><td align="right">179</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Seat allocation via Sainte-Laguë method; 349 seats, 4% national threshold.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threshold-risk-parties">Threshold-risk parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-risk-parties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threshold-risk-parties">Threshold-risk parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-risk-parties"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>C</strong> (4.5%): motion filings (5 motions incl. reform content) aim to differentiate from S — critical survival lever.</li>
 <li><strong>L</strong> (3.8%): zero motions this wave; L relies on Tidö coalition visibility, not parliamentary activism.</li>
 <li><strong>MP</strong> (4.2%): 6 motions create signal but threshold vulnerability remains.</li>
 <li><strong>KD</strong> (5.1%): safely above threshold, no motion activity in wave.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-campaign-narrative-construction">Campaign narrative construction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-narrative-construction"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-campaign-narrative-construction">Campaign narrative construction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-narrative-construction"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     S[S narrative&#x3C;br/>'Ansvarsfull fiscal politik'] -->|evidence| HD082[HD024082 motion]
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-campaign-narrative-construction">Campaign narrative construction<a cl
     style C fill:#009933,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style M fill:#1f9ed1,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style SD fill:#ffd700,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-key-dates">Electoral key dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-key-dates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-key-dates">Electoral key dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-key-dates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2892,7 +2892,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-key-dates">Electoral key dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Motion relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-05 to 2026-06</td><td>Utskott hearings</td><td>Motions referenced in debate</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Riksdagen summer recess</td><td>Kammarvoter on Tidö bills 214–236</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07</td><td>Almedalen veckan</td><td>Motion content becomes campaign material</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08</td><td>Formal campaign start</td><td>Motions cited in party manifestos</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Election day</td><td>Motion-mobilised blocs go to polls</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-judgments">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-judgments">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Motion wave amplifies S fiscal-anchor narrative more than any other single event Q2 2026.</li>
 <li>C needs every motion-driven differentiation event to survive 4% threshold; MP in similar position.</li>
@@ -2902,8 +2902,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-judgments">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <hr>
 <p><em>All percentages are public polling averages. All seat projections are analyst estimates, not predictions.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag seat distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag seat distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2980,7 +2980,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag s
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Seats</th><th align="right">Mandat</th><th>Bloc</th><th align="right">Ja / Nej / Avstår on Tidö bills 214–236 (expected)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">107</td><td align="right">107</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej / Avstår (per motion stance)</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">68</td><td align="right">68</td><td>Tidö</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">73</td><td align="right">73</td><td>Tidö support</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">24</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">24</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej / Reformamendment</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">19</td><td align="right">19</td><td>Tidö</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">18</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">16</td><td align="right">16</td><td>Tidö</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill">Tidö vote-math on each bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill">Tidö vote-math on each bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3068,25 +3068,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill">Tidö vote-math on each bill<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">Expected Ja</th><th align="center">Expected Nej</th><th align="center">Expected Avstår</th><th align="center">Margin</th><th align="center">Pass?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Prop 214 cyber</td><td align="center">176 (M+SD+KD+L)</td><td align="center">66 (V+MP+C)</td><td align="center">107 (S)</td><td align="center">+2.5×opp</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 215 tidsbeg boende</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">66</td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 216 medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">66</td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes, possible amendment</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 222 ersättning</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP)</td><td align="center">131 (S+C)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 223 konsumkredit</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">48 (V+C)</td><td align="center">125</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 228 krigsmateriel</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP)</td><td align="center">131 (S+C)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229 mottagandelag</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP+C partial)</td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235 utvisning</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP)</td><td align="center">107+24 (S+C abstain)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 236 drivmedel (ändringsbudget)</td><td align="center">176*</td><td align="center">49 (V+MP+C)</td><td align="center">107 (S)</td><td align="center">Yes*</td><td align="center">*Extra procedure risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Extra ändringsbudget route requires Finansutskottet majority + kammarmajoritet; Tidö holds both 176/349.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-coalition-pathways">Opposition coalition pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coalition-pathways"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc">Path A — Classical red-green-centre (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coalition-pathways">Opposition coalition pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coalition-pathways"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc">Path A — Classical red-green-centre (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 107 + 24 + 18 + 24 = <strong>173/349</strong> → 3 seats short of majority.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility</strong>: Low — requires all 4 opposition parties in lockstep; C-V ideological gap historical barrier.<br>
 <strong>Motion evidence</strong>: Only prop 216 shows 4-party wave; other bills show fragmentation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-path-b--red-red-svmp">Path B — Red-red (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-b--red-red-svmp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-b--red-red-svmp">Path B — Red-red (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-b--red-red-svmp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 107 + 24 + 18 = <strong>149/349</strong> → 26 seats short. Non-viable without C.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-path-c--red--centre-sc">Path C — Red + centre (S+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-c--red--centre-sc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-c--red--centre-sc">Path C — Red + centre (S+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-c--red--centre-sc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 107 + 24 = <strong>131/349</strong> → 44 seats short. Non-viable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160">Path D — Tidö defection scenario (Tidö − L = 160)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160">Path D — Tidö defection scenario (Tidö − L = 160)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 176 − 16 = <strong>160/349</strong> → 14 seats short. If L leaves Tidö, government falls.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility</strong>: Low in 2026 mandate; L polling below threshold disincentivises defection (lose-lose).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-motion-to-vote-mapping">Motion-to-vote mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-to-vote-mapping">Motion-to-vote mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-mapping"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Motion filings do not alter seat math</strong>. 20 motions produce floor speeches + betänkande content, not vote changes.</li>
 <li><strong>Motion content can alter public opinion</strong> which influences 2026-09 election, which reshapes post-election coalition math.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected">Post-2026 election scenarios (projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift">Scenario P1 — Tidö continuation (probable if no major shift)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected">Post-2026 election scenarios (projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift">Scenario P1 — Tidö continuation (probable if no major shift)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3149,7 +3149,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift">Scenario
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Projected seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">111</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">60</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">85</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">34</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">12–15</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">16</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">14–16</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">8–11 (threshold risk)</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>169–172</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>169–176</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: Near tie; L's threshold survival is decisive. If L drops below 4%, Tidö falls to 161; opposition potentially 179.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc">Scenario P2 — S-led government (requires S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc">Scenario P2 — S-led government (requires S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3168,9 +3168,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc">Scenario P2 — S-led g
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Need</th><th align="center">Seat requirement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Red-green-centre majority</td><td align="center">≥ 175</td></tr><tr><td>Feasible only if MP ≥ 5%, C ≥ 5%</td><td align="center">Both near threshold</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm">Scenario P3 — Grand coalition S+M<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm">Scenario P3 — Grand coalition S+M<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Historical precedent</strong>: None in modern era; improbable.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-indicators">Coalition stability indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-indicators">Coalition stability indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-indicators"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     Tidö[Tidö 176/349] -->|prop 214-236| Pass[Bills pass]
@@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-indicators">Coalition stability indicators<a clas
     style Tidö fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Fall fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style RedGreen fill:#e30613,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments-1">Key judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments-1">Key judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Tidö 176/349 is sufficient for every single vote in the 2026-04-24 motion cluster; no opposition coalition can block passage.</li>
 <li>Post-2026 coalition math depends almost entirely on L threshold survival and SD/M relative share; motion content influences this indirectly.</li>
@@ -3195,46 +3195,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgments-1">Key judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <p><em>Seat counts from <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/ledamoter-partier/">Riksdagen.se</a>. Projected seats are analyst estimates based on reported polling; not predictions.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Maps motions to Swedish voter segments. Based on publicly available SCB demography, Novus/Demoskop issue-salience surveys, and published electoral-research typologies.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-voter-segments">Primary voter segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-voter-segments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate">Segment A — Rural/Commuter (~18% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-voter-segments">Primary voter segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-voter-segments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate">Segment A — Rural/Commuter (~18% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Geographic rural, high fuel dependency, median age 45–65.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Fuel price, healthcare access, school closures.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Drivmedel cluster (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>); prop 216 (rural healthcare).<br>
 <strong>2022 vote split</strong>: S 28%, M 20%, SD 25%, KD 7%, C 10%, other 10%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift from motion wave</strong>: +0.5–1.0% S, −0.5% M.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22">Segment B — Urban professional (~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22">Segment B — Urban professional (~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Stockholm/Göteborg/Malmö urban cores, tertiary educated.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Climate, international policy, welfare.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Krigsmateriel (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>); drivmedel (climate framing MP/V).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 32%, M 22%, V 12%, MP 8%, L 7%, C 5%, SD 8%, KD 2%, other 4%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: +0.3–0.5% V/MP, stable S.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24">Segment C — Suburban middle (~24%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24">Segment C — Suburban middle (~24%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Medelinkomst, småhus, 30–55 years, kommun vs kommun varierande.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Migration, healthcare queues, trygghet.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Utvisning (prop 235); prop 216 (healthcare).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 26%, M 22%, SD 22%, KD 7%, C 6%, L 5%, V 5%, MP 5%, other 2%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: stable to +0.5% SD on migration salience; +0.3% S on healthcare.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15">Segment D — Young voter (18–29, ~15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15">Segment D — Young voter (18–29, ~15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Urban, high education, high climate concern, high migration tolerance.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Climate, housing, civil rights.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Krigsmateriel (MP), drivmedel (climate framing), utvisning (V rights framing).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 20%, M 10%, SD 15%, V 20%, MP 15%, C 8%, KD 4%, L 3%, other 5%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: +0.5–1.0% V, +0.3–0.5% MP.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22">Segment E — Retired pensioners (65+, ~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22">Segment E — Retired pensioners (65+, ~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Pensionsmottagare, geographic mixed, heavy healthcare reliance.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Pension, healthcare, trygghet.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: prop 222 (ersättning); prop 216 (healthcare).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 34%, M 20%, SD 20%, KD 10%, C 6%, V 4%, MP 2%, L 2%, other 2%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: +0.3% S, stable SD.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5">Segment F — Civil-society activist (~5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5">Segment F — Civil-society activist (~5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Cross-generation, high political engagement, media-connected.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Rättssäkerhet, human rights, environmental policy.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Utvisning (V/MP framing); vapenexport (MP).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: V 30%, MP 25%, S 20%, C 10%, L 5%, M 5%, SD 3%, KD 2%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: high mobilisation amplification for V/MP.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix">Segment-motion mobilisation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix">Segment-motion mobilisation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3304,7 +3304,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix">Segment-motion mobilisation matri
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th align="center">Drivmedel</th><th align="center">Utvisning</th><th align="center">Prop 216</th><th align="center">Krigsmateriel</th><th align="center">Ersättning</th><th align="center">Cyber</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>A Rural</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr><tr><td>B Urban prof</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td></tr><tr><td>C Suburban</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr><tr><td>D Young</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td></tr><tr><td>E Pensioners</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td></tr><tr><td>F Civil-society</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-communication-channel-map">Communication channel map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-communication-channel-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-communication-channel-map">Communication channel map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-communication-channel-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     S[S motion&#x3C;br/>HD024082 fiscal] --> A[Seg A Rural&#x3C;br/>local press, DN]
@@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-communication-channel-map">Communication channel map<a class="" aria-
     style V fill:#a31621,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style MP fill:#83c67a,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style C_motion fill:#009933,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy">Implications for campaign strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy">Implications for campaign strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S</strong> should frame drivmedel motion for A+E (rural + pensioner) — combined 40% of electorate.</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong> should frame utvisning motion for D+F (young + civil-society) — combined 20% but high-activism multiplier.</li>
@@ -3329,28 +3329,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy">Implications for campaign strateg
 <hr>
 <p><em>Voter segment sizes are published SCB demographic approximations. Issue salience is reported Novus/Demoskop data. No individual voter targeting — aggregate segments only.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Comparator jurisdictions for the Swedish motion wave. Three comparators: <strong>Denmark</strong>, <strong>Germany</strong>, <strong>United Kingdom</strong>. Purpose: triangulate how equivalent opposition behaviour plays out under different parliamentary systems.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparators">Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparators"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture">1. Denmark — Folketing motion culture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparators">Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture">1. Denmark — Folketing motion culture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>System</strong>: Unicameral, minority governments norm, "parliamentarism".
 <strong>Relevant pattern</strong>: Opposition files "beslutningsforslag" (B) motions prolifically — norm rather than signal.
 <strong>Analogue to SWE 2026-04-24</strong>: Danish opposition similarly fragmented S/SF/EL on fiscal questions; government routinely negotiates per-bill deals ("forligspolitik") unavailable in Swedish Tidö context.
 <strong>Difference</strong>: Denmark's tradition of broad cross-bloc "forlig" dampens motion-wave impact; Sweden's Tidö agreement locks support pre-vote, reducing motion leverage.
 <strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://www.ft.dk/">ft.dk</a>, Danish research "Forhandlingspolitik og fragmenterede majoriteter" (Christiansen, Pedersen).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions">2. Germany — Bundestag opposition motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions">2. Germany — Bundestag opposition motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>System</strong>: Federal bicameral, coalition government norm, constitutional review.
 <strong>Relevant pattern</strong>: SPD/Grüne/FDP Ampel (2021-2024) faced CDU/CSU + AfD + Linke opposition; opposition "Anträge" often parallel, rarely co-signed across bloc.
 <strong>Analogue</strong>: German opposition fragmentation on Heizungsgesetz (2023) mirrors Swedish fragmentation on drivmedel 2026 — three opposition parties, three parallel tracks.
 <strong>Difference</strong>: Bundesrat (Länder chamber) adds veto point absent in Swedish system; Swedish Regering faces only Riksdag floor.
 <strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://www.bundestag.de/">bundestag.de</a>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition">3. United Kingdom — Commons opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition">3. United Kingdom — Commons opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>System</strong>: Westminster unitary, single-party majorities common.
 <strong>Relevant pattern</strong>: HoC opposition amendments on government bills; Labour 2019–2024 in opposition filed reasoned amendments on Conservative migration legislation (Illegal Migration Act 2023, Rwanda Act 2024).
 <strong>Analogue</strong>: Labour reasoned amendments on Rwanda scheme structurally similar to V/MP avslag on Swedish <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>.
 <strong>Difference</strong>: First-past-the-post produces single-axis opposition; PR produces multi-axis (fiscal/defence/migration) as seen 2026-04-24.
 <strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://www.parliament.uk/">parliament.uk</a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-matrix">Comparative matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-matrix">Comparative matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3406,16 +3406,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-matrix">Comparative matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden 2026-04-24</th><th>Denmark</th><th>Germany</th><th>UK</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Parliamentary system</td><td>Unicameral, Tidö + support</td><td>Unicameral, minority norm</td><td>Federal bicameral</td><td>Westminster majority</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition fragmentation</td><td>4 parties S/V/MP/C</td><td>4-5 parties (S/SF/EL/RV)</td><td>3 parties (CDU/AfD/Linke)</td><td>1 dominant (Labour)</td></tr><tr><td>Counter-motion density</td><td>2.2 motions/bill</td><td>~3 motions/bill (B-forslag)</td><td>~2 Anträge/bill</td><td>1 reasoned amendment norm</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition discipline</td><td>Tidö 176/349 locked</td><td>Broad forlig norm</td><td>Ampel internal strain</td><td>Single-party discipline</td></tr><tr><td>Ethical vapenexport precedent</td><td>MP HD024096</td><td>2015 Bahrain debate</td><td>Saudi arms freeze 2018</td><td>Rwanda scheme 2023</td></tr><tr><td>Migration opposition framing</td><td>Rättssäkerhet (V/MP)</td><td>Folkeoplysning (EL)</td><td>Verfassungsmäßigkeit (Linke)</td><td>Human rights (Labour)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-insight">Key insight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-insight">Key insight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PR + formal coalition agreement is unusually rigid</strong>. The comparator jurisdictions show that opposition motion waves in minority/coalition systems typically produce either forlig (Denmark) or per-bill coalition flexibility (Germany Ampel). Tidö's formal written agreement + SD's coalition discipline produces less flexibility than comparable regimes — which means 2026-04-24 motions likely have <strong>less</strong> impact than opposition-motion density would predict.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-21">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-21">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-21"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Swedish opposition cannot replicate Danish forligspolitik because Tidö-avtal precludes bilateral bill-by-bill deals.</li>
 <li>German Bundesrat-style veto point absent — no fallback forum for opposition.</li>
 <li>UK-style single-bill reasoned amendments more impactful per unit effort than Swedish multi-axis motions.</li>
 <li>Election-cycle effect (SE 2026) more determinative of motion impact than parliamentary math.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition">Cross-national lessons for Swedish opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition">Cross-national lessons for Swedish opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S</strong> (take Denmark's book): Build durable fiscal-anchor narrative that survives one election cycle; don't expect per-motion wins.</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong> (take Germany's book): Build extra-parliamentary pressure (civil society + media) to amplify motions.</li>
@@ -3425,40 +3425,40 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition">Cross-national lessons
 <hr>
 <p><em>Comparator data sourced from public parliamentary archives. No classified or private sources.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identifies five relevant parallels.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen">Parallel 1 — 2014 spring motion wave vs. Alliansregeringen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen">Parallel 1 — 2014 spring motion wave vs. Alliansregeringen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: March–May 2014.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Alliansregeringen (M+FP+C+KD) minority government with Tidö-analogous support from opposition Ds on migration.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Opposition S+V+MP filed parallel motions across fiscal/welfare package pre-autumn 2014 election.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: Government lost 2014-09 election despite passing most bills intact.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Bill passage ≠ electoral success; motion content shapes campaign.<br>
 <strong>Source</strong>: Riksdagen archives, <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate">Parallel 2 — 2018 fuel price / drivmedel politisk debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate">Parallel 2 — 2018 fuel price / drivmedel politisk debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2018 pre-election.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: SD mobilised around drivmedel prices against Löfven-S regering.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Drivmedel (prop 236) / <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> / <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a> is ideologically inverted 2018 pattern.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: SD grew from 12.9% (2014) to 17.5% (2018) on rural fiscal grievance.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Drivmedel is recurring Swedish politicum with measurable electoral traction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift">Parallel 3 — 2015–2016 utvisning / asylum policy shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift">Parallel 3 — 2015–2016 utvisning / asylum policy shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: Autumn 2015 → spring 2016.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Löfven-S/MP regering shifted migration policy from "our hearts are wide open" to tougher controls.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Prop 235 / <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a> continues Tidö hardening trajectory; V/MP opposition echoes 2016 dynamics.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: S lost migration-liberal voters to V; gained some centre voters; net near zero.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Migration hardening produces realignment without net shift; V gains at S expense.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application">Parallel 4 — 2022 krigsmateriel / vapenexport debate (pre-Nato application)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application">Parallel 4 — 2022 krigsmateriel / vapenexport debate (pre-Nato application)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: March–May 2022.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Post-invasion of Ukraine; Sweden's Nato application; MP split from S.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: MP motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a> extends 2022 ethical-export axis.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: Swedish Nato accession 2024; MP's ethical critique absorbed into mainstream through qualified support.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: MP's ethical-defence framework has durability but limited single-election traction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering">Parallel 5 — 1994 spring motion wave vs. Bildt regering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering">Parallel 5 — 1994 spring motion wave vs. Bildt regering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: March–June 1994.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Bildt (M) borgerlig minority government with Ny Demokrati support.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Structurally similar to Tidö — borgerlig block + unconventional support party (ND then, SD now); opposition wave included fiscal critique.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: Carlsson (S) won 1994 election; Bildt out; ND vanished.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Dependence on non-traditional support parties creates narrative fragility; motion wave amplifies this.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-motion-density-baselines">Historical motion-density baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-motion-density-baselines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-motion-density-baselines">Historical motion-density baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-motion-density-baselines"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3526,7 +3526,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-motion-density-baselines">Historical motion-density baseli
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">Year</th><th>Post-proposition-package window</th><th align="right">Motions filed</th><th>Opposition parties</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">2014</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~25</td><td>S+V+MP+C</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2018</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~30</td><td>SD+MP+V</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2019</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~18</td><td>M+C+KD+L+V</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2020</td><td>Spring (pandemic)</td><td align="right">~12</td><td>M+V</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2021</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~22</td><td>M+SD+V+KD</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2022</td><td>Spring pre-election</td><td align="right">~35</td><td>M+SD+V+KD+L</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2024</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~15</td><td>S+V+MP+C</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2025</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~20</td><td>S+V+MP+C</td></tr><tr><td align="right"><strong>2026 (this wave)</strong></td><td>Spring pre-election</td><td align="right"><strong>20 in 3 days</strong></td><td><strong>S+V+MP+C</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: 2026-04-24 wave is within normal range but compressed into 3 days — pattern consistent with coordinated pre-election positioning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3575,7 +3575,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parallel</th><th>Regering</th><th align="center">Tidö-analogue?</th><th align="center">Election impact</th><th align="center">Motion wave size</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1994 Bildt</td><td>M+FP+C+KD+ND</td><td align="center">Yes (ND)</td><td align="center">Regering fell</td><td align="center">Large</td></tr><tr><td>2014 Reinfeldt</td><td>M+FP+C+KD</td><td align="center">Partial</td><td align="center">Regering fell</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>2018 Löfven I</td><td>S+MP / C+L neutrality</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center">Minor coalition loss</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>2022 Andersson</td><td>S</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center">Regering fell</td><td align="center">Large</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026 Kristersson</strong></td><td><strong>M+KD+L+SD support</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Yes</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>TBD 2026-09-13</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Medium</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-timeline">Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-timeline">Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 timeline
     title Swedish opposition motion waves vs regering outcomes
@@ -3584,7 +3584,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-timeline">Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
     2018 : Löfven I loses voter support despite passing bills
     2022 : Andersson regering falls after motion wave + election
     2026 : Kristersson regering — TBD</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern">Judgments from historical pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern">Judgments from historical pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Every spring motion wave before a Swedish election since 1994 has preceded a regering change.</li>
 <li>This is <strong>not a universal rule</strong> — but baseline probability of regering change in 2026-09 is ≥ 50% per pattern-base rate.</li>
@@ -3595,67 +3595,67 @@ <h2 id="rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern">Judgments from historical pattern<
 <hr>
 <p><em>Historical data from <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">Riksdagen.se</a> archives and <a href="https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/demokrati/allmanna-val/">SCB election tables</a>. No forecasting claim; pattern base-rate only.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Assesses the implementation feasibility of the 9 Tidö bills <strong>if passed</strong>, independent of political outcome. Focus: administrative, fiscal, legal, and temporal realism.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-bill-feasibility">Per-bill feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-bill-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform">Prop 214 — Cybersäkerhet reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-bill-feasibility">Per-bill feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-bill-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform">Prop 214 — Cybersäkerhet reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Requires MSB capacity expansion; coordination with PTS (Post- och telestyrelsen).<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: ~500 MSEK/year ramp-up; within budget feasibility.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Compatible with NIS2 directive; implementation 12–18 months.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Skill shortage in cybersäkerhet; recruitment timeline.<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: C motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a> flags implementation risk.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Medium</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende">Prop 215 — Tidsbegränsat boende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende">Prop 215 — Tidsbegränsat boende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Migrationsverket + kommunal samordning.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Neutral to slight saving.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: ECHR Art. 8 (family life) compatibility concerns flagged by C <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Legal challenge risk; Migrationsdomstol caseload.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Low-Medium</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform">Prop 216 — Medicinsk kompetens reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform">Prop 216 — Medicinsk kompetens reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Major — SKR kommunsektor engagement required; legitimationsprocess ändras.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Kommunsektor-kostnad unclear; 4-party motion wave flags finansiering.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: EU-direktiv (2005/36/EC) compatibility must be verified.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Workforce pipeline depends on Socialstyrelsens kapacitet.<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: All 4 opposition parties flag implementation concerns.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Low</strong> — highest implementation risk in wave.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler">Prop 222 — Ersättningsregler<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler">Prop 222 — Ersättningsregler<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Försäkringskassan IT-system update; moderate.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Neutral.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Väl avgränsat; minimal risk.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: IT-modernisering timeline.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Medium-High</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit">Prop 223 — Konsumentkredit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit">Prop 223 — Konsumentkredit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Finansinspektionen + Konsumentverket tillsyn.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Neutral.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Kompatibel med EU-direktiv 2008/48/EC som uppdaterat 2023/2225.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Kreditgivare-anpassning 6–12 mån.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>High</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel">Prop 228 — Krigsmateriel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel">Prop 228 — Krigsmateriel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: ISP (Inspektionen för strategiska produkter) capacity.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: ISP-budget ~50 MSEK/år sufficient.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Kompatibel med EU-gemensam ståndpunkt 2008/944/CFSP.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: MP-motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a> framework would add review burden.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>High</strong> as drafted; <strong>Medium</strong> if MP framework adopted.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-229--mottagandelag">Prop 229 — Mottagandelag<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-229--mottagandelag"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-229--mottagandelag">Prop 229 — Mottagandelag<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-229--mottagandelag"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Migrationsverket + kommunal mottagandekapacitet.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Kommunal ersättningssystem ändringar; ~800 MSEK omfördelning.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Dublin III / CEAS compatibility.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Kommunal opposition; C motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a> flags kommun ersättning.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Medium-Low</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-235--utvisning">Prop 235 — Utvisning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-235--utvisning"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-235--utvisning">Prop 235 — Utvisning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-235--utvisning"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Migrationsverket + Migrationsdomstolar + Polisen.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Migrationsverket + Polisen kapacitet ~1.5 mdkr ramp.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: ECHR Art. 3 + 8 + EU return directive (2008/115/EC) compliance non-trivial.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Domstolarnas kapacitet; ECHR rechtspraxis risk.<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: V/MP motions flag rättssäkerhet concerns.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Low-Medium</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget">Prop 236 — Drivmedel (ändringsbudget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget">Prop 236 — Drivmedel (ändringsbudget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Skatteverket systemändring enkel; ~3 månader.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: ~2.5 mdkr statsbudgetkostnad; S motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> begär finansiering.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: EU energiskattedirektiv (2003/96/EC) golvnivå måste hållas.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget procedur — FiU majoritetsmust hållas.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>High administrativt</strong>; <strong>Medium politiskt</strong> (extra procedur).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3742,7 +3742,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">Admin</th><th align="center">Fiscal</th><th align="center">Legal</th><th align="center">Temporal</th><th align="center">Overall</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>214 cyber</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>215 tidsbeg</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Low-Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>216 med komp</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>Low</strong></td></tr><tr><td>222 ersättn</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Medium-High</strong></td></tr><tr><td>223 konskred</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td></tr><tr><td>228 krigsmat</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td></tr><tr><td>229 mottag</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>235 utvisning</td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>Low-Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>236 drivmedel</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong> procedural risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-bill-dependencies">Cross-bill dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-bill-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-bill-dependencies">Cross-bill dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-bill-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     216[Prop 216 med komp] -->|workforce| 235[Prop 235 utvisning]
@@ -3757,7 +3757,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-bill-dependencies">Cross-bill dependencies<a class="" aria-hidd
     style 229 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style 235 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style 236 fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-judgments-1">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-judgments-1">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-1"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Prop 216</strong> is the highest implementation-risk bill; motion wave correctly identifies weakest link.</li>
 <li><strong>Prop 235 + 229</strong> combined create kommunal kapacitet stress.</li>
@@ -3765,7 +3765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-judgments-1">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li><strong>Prop 214 + 223 + 228</strong> är relativt oproblematiska administrativt.</li>
 <li>Opposition-motioner fokuserar — korrekt — på de bilar med reell implementationsrisk (216, 229, 235, 236).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-timeline">Implementation timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-timeline">Implementation timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 gantt
     title Implementation timeline if all bills pass 2026-06
@@ -3785,10 +3785,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-implementation-timeline">Implementation timeline<a class="" aria-hidd
 <hr>
 <p><em>Implementation feasibility is independent of political feasibility. Sources: <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>, <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a>, <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/">ec.europa.eu</a> for EU directive references.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses). Purpose: ensure the dominant narrative is not adopted by default.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-ledger">Hypothesis ledger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-ledger"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims">H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-ledger">Hypothesis ledger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-ledger"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims">H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The 20-motion wave reveals coordinated opposition resistance to Tidö's legislative package; SD silence amplifies Tidö discipline; motions shape 2026 election cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3803,7 +3803,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims">H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthes
 <li>Motion filing != voter salience</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Moderate (Admiralty B3)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis">H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis">H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: This motion wave is routine parliamentary procedure; the 20-motion count is statistically within normal post-proposition activity and has no predictive value for 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3818,7 +3818,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis">H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis<a cl
 <li>Timing 4 months pre-election amplifies salience</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Moderate (Admiralty B3)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party">H3 — Contrarian hypothesis (Tidö is the vulnerable party)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party">H3 — Contrarian hypothesis (Tidö is the vulnerable party)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The real political story is not opposition coordination but Tidö fragility — the need for 9 bills in a single wave is itself a signal of rushed implementation pre-election, and SD silence is preparation to claim credit if bills pass or to break away if they fail.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3833,7 +3833,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party">H3 — Contr
 <li>Extra ändringsbudget is not unprecedented</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Low-Moderate (C3)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis">H4 — Economic-determinist hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis">H4 — Economic-determinist hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: Fuel-price politics (prop 236 / HD024082 / HD024092 / HD024098) dominates everything; migration/defence/welfare motions are noise around the real axis of rural-urban fiscal conflict, already mediated by SCB KPI data and ECB rate cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3848,7 +3848,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis">H4 — Economic-determinist hypo
 <li>MP framing explicitly multi-axis</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Low (C4)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring">ACH matrix (consistency scoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring">ACH matrix (consistency scoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3926,13 +3926,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring">ACH matrix (consistency scoring)<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">H1</th><th align="center">H2</th><th align="center">H3</th><th align="center">H4</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20 motions in 3 days</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Zero SD counter-motions</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Four-party wave on prop 216</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">−</td></tr><tr><td>MP ethical vapenexport framework</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">−</td></tr><tr><td>Extra ändringsbudget route</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>SD polling advantage</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>SCB fuel inflation</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Election-cycle timing</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Historical 15–30 motion baseline</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: + = consistent, − = inconsistent, 0 = neutral. H1 is best-supported but not decisively. H2 is plausible null; analyst should not over-claim.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-uncertainties">Key uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties">Key uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Is 20 motions statistically above baseline? (Answer requires multi-year motion-density dataset — flagged for ingest in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a>.)</li>
 <li>Will SD break silence if any Tidö bill fails? (Watch: public statements next 30 days.)</li>
 <li>Will SKR formally object to prop 216? (Direct validator for H1 vs H2.)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-recommendations">Red-team recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-recommendations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-recommendations">Red-team recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-recommendations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Add</strong>: motion-density baseline from Riksdagen archives 2018–2025 before next run.</li>
 <li><strong>Add</strong>: SCB public-opinion data on drivmedel and migration salience.</li>
@@ -3942,9 +3942,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-recommendations">Red-team recommendations<a class="" aria-hi
 <hr>
 <p><em>Structured challenge does not reject the lead synthesis but recommends hedging on confidence where evidence is thin. All dok_id citations are verifiable at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Seven-dimension classification per document. Dimensions: <strong>Policy Area</strong>, <strong>Process Stage</strong>, <strong>Partisan Axis</strong>, <strong>Electoral Salience</strong>, <strong>Legal Intensity</strong>, <strong>Fiscal Impact</strong>, <strong>Distributional Effect</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4224,7 +4224,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Policy Area</th><th>Stage</th><th>Partisan Axis</th><th>Elect Salience</th><th>Legal</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>Distributional</th><th>Priority</th><th>Retention</th><th>Access</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a></td><td>Fiscal/energy</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left-bloc vs Tidö</td><td>Very High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>High</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P0</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td><td>Fiscal/climate</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a></td><td>Fiscal/distributional</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Highly progressive</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td><td>Foreign/defence</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö+S</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td><td>Migration/justice</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>High</td><td>Very High</td><td>Low</td><td>Redistributive</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td><td>Migration/justice</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Redistributive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td><td>Migration/justice</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a></td><td>Migration/welfare</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a></td><td>Migration/welfare</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a></td><td>Foreign/defence</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a></td><td>Welfare/health</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>S vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Progressive</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a></td><td>Welfare/health</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Progressive</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a></td><td>Welfare/health</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td><td>Civil law</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>S vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">HD024085</a></td><td>Civil law</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">HD024084</a></td><td>Civil law</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">HD024079</a></td><td>Migration/labour</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>S vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">HD024086</a></td><td>Migration/labour</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a></td><td>Defence/cyber</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Low</td><td>Neutral</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a></td><td>Consumer finance</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-distribution">Priority tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-distribution">Priority tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4261,9 +4261,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tier-distribution">Priority tier distribution<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th align="right">Count</th><th align="right">Share</th><th>Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>P0 (critical)</td><td align="right">1</td><td align="right">5%</td><td>Lead article, detailed stakeholder map</td></tr><tr><td>P1 (high)</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">20%</td><td>Secondary articles, dedicated section</td></tr><tr><td>P2 (medium)</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">45%</td><td>Cluster analysis</td></tr><tr><td>P3 (routine)</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">30%</td><td>Briefly noted in table</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 <p>All 20 documents are <strong>Offentliga handlingar</strong> (public documents) under Offentlighetsprincipen. Retention: permanent (Riksdagsdata long-term archive). Access control: none required. GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) — data manifestly made public by data subjects (MPs acting in official capacity). No special-category masking required.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map">Mermaid — classification heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map">Mermaid — classification heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     subgraph Fiscal [Fiscal — 3 motions]
@@ -4307,9 +4307,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map">Mermaid — classification heat map
 <hr>
 <p><em>Classification cross-validated against significance-scoring.md DIW tiers (L3 ↔ P0, L2+ ↔ P1, L2 ↔ P2, L1 ↔ P3).</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Maps policy clusters, legislative chains, opposition coordination patterns across 20 motions.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-graph">Policy cluster graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-cluster-graph">Policy cluster graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     subgraph Fiscal[Fiscal / Economy — FiU]
@@ -4349,7 +4349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-graph">Policy cluster graph<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style Migration fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Welfare fill:#8338ec,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style Civil fill:#3a86ff,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chain">Legislative chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chain">Legislative chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     GovProp[Regering props&#x3C;br/>214-236] --> Filed[Filed&#x3C;br/>riksdag.se]
@@ -4364,7 +4364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chain">Legislative chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style GovProp fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Kammarvote fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style Law fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-coordination-matrix">Opposition coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coordination-matrix">Opposition coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4451,19 +4451,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-opposition-coordination-matrix">Opposition coordination matrix<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">C</th><th>Coordination pattern</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Drivmedel (236)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Three-party parallel (no co-sign)</td></tr><tr><td>Krigsmateriel (228)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Three-party parallel, divergent content</td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning (235)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Three-party parallel, converging on rättssäkerhet</td></tr><tr><td>Medicinsk kompetens (216)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td><strong>Four-party wave</strong> — strongest coordination</td></tr><tr><td>Mottagandelag (229)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Single-party (C)</td></tr><tr><td>Tidsbeg boende (215)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Single-party (C)</td></tr><tr><td>Ersättning (222)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Two-party</td></tr><tr><td>Konsumentkredit (223)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Two-party</td></tr><tr><td>Cybersäk (214)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Two-party</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-issue-linkage-network">Issue-linkage network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-linkage-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-issue-linkage-network">Issue-linkage network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-linkage-network"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Drivmedel ↔ migration</strong>: V explicitly frames both as distributional questions (HD024092 + HD024090). Rhetorical thread: "who pays".</li>
 <li><strong>Krigsmateriel ↔ cyber</strong>: MP links defence-industry scrutiny to civil cyber resilience (HD024096 + HD024085).</li>
 <li><strong>Medicinsk kompetens ↔ mottagandelag</strong>: C links healthcare workforce to migration system capacity (HD024094 + HD024089).</li>
 <li><strong>Utvisning ↔ tidsbeg boende</strong>: Both migration-regime bills; C on one, V/MP/S on the other — divergent issue selection among opposition.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref">Historical precedents (same-day cross-ref)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref">Historical precedents (same-day cross-ref)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>2026-04-23 motions cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/"><code>../2026-04-23/motions/</code></a>) — previous day's motion wave preceded this one; check continuity.</li>
 <li>2026-04-18 propositions cluster — originating Tidö legislative package.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-external-links">External links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-links">External links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-links"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Riksdagen open data: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a></li>
 <li>All dok_ids resolvable at <code>https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html</code></li>
@@ -4472,8 +4472,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-links">External links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <hr>
 <p><em>Cross-reference map generated from 20 motion manifest. Verifiable via <code>search_dokument</code> on any dok_id.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>Checklist against the ICD 203 nine standards:</p>
 
 
@@ -4541,7 +4541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Standard</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>Objectivity</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Neutral language; every party treated symmetrically in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md">swot-analysis.md</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>Independence from political advocacy</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>No recommendations favour any party; judgments are descriptive</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>Timeliness</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>2026-04-24 analysis of 2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17 motion wave</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>Based on available sources</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>All claims cite dok_id or primary URL</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>Proper standard of analytic tradecraft</td><td align="center">Partial</td><td>SATs used: ACH (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a>), SWOT, scenario analysis; attested below</td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>Properly describes quality of source</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Admiralty codes applied in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md">intelligence-assessment.md</a> (B2, B3, C3, C4)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>Expresses uncertainties</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Confidence labels on every KJ; probabilities sum to 100% in scenarios</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>Distinguishes intelligence from assumptions</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Key assumptions flagged (e.g. baseline motion density unknown)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>Incorporates alternative analysis</td><td align="center">✓</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a> H2/H3/H4 considered</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation">Structured analytic techniques (SAT) attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation">Structured analytic techniques (SAT) attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>At least 10 SATs applied to this run:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</strong> — <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a></li>
@@ -4557,7 +4557,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation">Structured analytic t
 <li><strong>Bayesian posterior estimation</strong> — <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md">risk-assessment.md</a></li>
 <li><strong>Decision-tree modelling</strong> — <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md">scenario-analysis.md</a></li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled">Admiralty Code source rating (WEP / Kent Scale reconciled)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled">Admiralty Code source rating (WEP / Kent Scale reconciled)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4613,7 +4613,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled">Admiralty Co
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th align="center">Reliability</th><th align="center">Credibility</th><th align="center">Combined</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdagen open data (dok_id)</td><td align="center">A</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">A1</td><td>Completely reliable, confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen.se propositions</td><td align="center">A</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">A1</td><td>Primary source</td></tr><tr><td>SCB statistics</td><td align="center">A</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Official statistics</td></tr><tr><td>MCP riksdag-regering</td><td align="center">B</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">B2</td><td>Usually reliable proxy for A1 sources</td></tr><tr><td>Historical parliamentary archives (inferred baselines)</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">C3</td><td>Fairly reliable, possibly true</td></tr><tr><td>Expert commentary (not used as primary evidence)</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">C4</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality--gaps">Data quality &#x26; gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality--gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality--gaps">Data quality &#x26; gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality--gaps"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Present</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>20 verified dok_ids, full metadata per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md">data-download-manifest.md</a></li>
@@ -4629,7 +4629,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-quality--gaps">Data quality &#x26; gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Cross-border comparators</strong> — Danish/German/UK equivalents described but not quantified on motion-density metric.</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-motions
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24866827737
 <strong>UTC timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-24T01:05Z
@@ -4639,7 +4639,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Lookback used</strong>: The current riksmöte 2025/26 motion window for counter-motions to government propositions peaked 2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17 (motion deadline following prop tabling). 2026-04-24 is a procedural day; the most recent 20 motions below form today's analytical corpus per §3 lookback policy.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions">Per-document inventory (20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions">Per-document inventory (20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4856,15 +4856,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions">Per-document inventory (20 motions
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Datum</th><th>Organ</th><th>Party</th><th>Responds to</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Full text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>HD024098</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>FiU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – drivmedel/el/gas</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>HD024096</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:228</td><td>Regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>HD024094</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SoU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:216</td><td>Medicinsk kompetens kommunal hälso- och sjukvård</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>HD024092</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>FiU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – drivmedel</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>HD024091</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:228</td><td>Krigsmateriel — vapenexport</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:235</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning p.g.a. brott</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:235</td><td>Utvisning p.g.a. brott — systematik</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>HD024093</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>FöU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:214</td><td>Nationellt cybersäkerhetscenter</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>HD024090</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:235</td><td>Utvisning p.g.a. brott — avslag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>HD024088</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:223</td><td>Ny konsumentkreditlag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">11</td><td>HD024086</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:215</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende nyanlända</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">12</td><td>HD024085</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:222</td><td>Ersättningsregler med brottsoffret i fokus</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">13</td><td>HD024084</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:222</td><td>Ersättningsregler — vårdnadshavares ansvar</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">14</td><td>HD024083</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SoU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:216</td><td>Medicinsk kompetens — avslag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">15</td><td>HD024082</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>FiU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">16</td><td>HD024081</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SoU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:216</td><td>Medicinsk kompetens — S-linje</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">17</td><td>HD024079</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:215</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende — S-linje</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">18</td><td>HD024078</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:222</td><td>Ersättningsregler — brottsofferlag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">19</td><td>HD024089</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:229</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">20</td><td>HD024087</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:229</td><td>En ny mottagandelag — avslag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-source-urls-primary">Source URLs (primary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-urls-primary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-urls-primary">Source URLs (primary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-urls-primary"></a></h3>
 <p>All accessible at <code>https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html</code>. Example: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html</a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_sync_status</code>: live (2026-04-24T01:05:50Z)</li>
 <li><code>get_motioner</code>: successful on first call, 20 records retrieved</li>
 <li>No retries required. No partial failures.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-summary">Cluster summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-summary">Cluster summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4934,6 +4934,53 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-summary">Cluster summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Opposition coverage</strong>: S (5), V (4), MP (6), C (5). Sverigedemokraterna (SD) absent from counter-motion wave — a structurally notable signal given SD's Tidö-coalition alignment.</p>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Author: James Pether Sörling · Generated via riksdag-regering MCP</em></p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024078-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024081-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024083-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024084-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024085-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024088-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024093-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024094-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -4999,7 +5046,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:12.283Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:33.825Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html b/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html
index 2ef5ac8fa9..f9ac3f76ed 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V,">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.542Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.121Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.542Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.121Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V,","description":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 20 counter-motions against 9 Tidö-government propositions — a coordinated legislative response concentrated in three…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:12.542Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024078-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024081-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024083-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024084-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024085-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024088-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024093-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024094-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V,","description":"Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed 20 counter-motions against 9 Tidö-government propositions — a coordinated legislative response concentrated in three…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:34.121Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-motions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024078-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024079-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024080-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024081-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024082-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024083-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024084-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024085-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024086-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024087-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024088-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024089-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024090-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024091-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024092-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024093-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024094-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024095-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024096-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024097-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD024098-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Between 2026-04-15 and 2026-04-17, the four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) filed <strong>20 counter-motions</strong> against <strong>9 Tidö-government propositions</strong> — a coordinated legislative response concentrated in three utskott (FiU/SfU/SoU) and anchored on the drivmedelsbudget (prop 2025/26:236, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>). <strong>Sverigedemokraterna filed zero counter-motions</strong>, preserving complete Tidö-bloc discipline. The wave telegraphs 2026-election positioning: S owns the fiscal-climate axis; V owns the distributional axis; MP owns the vapenexport axis; C owns the procedural-reform axis; SD stays silent.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Editorial priority ranking</strong> — Lead coverage on drivmedel cluster (3 motions, election-salient), secondary on utvisning cluster (rule-of-law) and vapenexport (foreign-policy cleavage).</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition-signal tracking</strong> — Log that S has <em>not</em> joined MP on the vapenexport motion (HD024096 vs absent S counterpart). This is a load-bearing red-green scenario constraint for 2026 government formation.</li>
 <li><strong>Forecast update</strong> — Raise probability of Tidö bills passing substantially unchanged from baseline 65% → 72%. SD's zero-motion posture removes the only plausible right-flank defection path on migration/justice.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-bullets">60-second bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-bullets"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-bullets">60-second bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-bullets"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scale</strong>: 20 motions / 72 hours / 9 propositions / 6 utskott. <strong>Admiralty B2</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>Battleground</strong>: Drivmedelsbudget (prop 236) is the single hottest file — S (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>), V (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>) and MP (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>) all filed.</li>
@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-bullets">60-second bullets<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Centre track</strong>: C filed on 5 bills (prop 215, 216, 222, 223, 229, 235) but consistently motions for procedural tightening rather than rejection — positioning for bourgeois-curious voters.</li>
 <li><strong>Regering risk</strong>: FiU vote on drivmedelspaket is the most likely outcome to generate floor-visible dissent; the coalition retains the arithmetic but opposition will use the debate for election-cycle framing.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top forward trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top forward trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p>📍 <strong>Watch</strong>: FiU's betänkande timeline on prop 2025/26:236 — if reported out before 2026-06-01, drivmedel becomes the defining pre-summer political narrative. If delayed into autumn, S's framing hardens and coalition cohesion faces stress on fuel-tax permanence.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--decision-landscape">Mermaid — decision landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--decision-landscape"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--decision-landscape">Mermaid — decision landscape<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--decision-landscape"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Start([20 motions filed&#x3C;br/>2026-04-15/17]) --> Cluster{Cluster by propagent}
@@ -267,13 +267,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--decision-landscape">Mermaid — decision landscape<a class="
 <p><strong>Full analysis</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md">synthesis-summary.md</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md">intelligence-assessment.md</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> · <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md">risk-assessment.md</a></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-decision">Lead decision<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-decision"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>BLUF</strong>: The four opposition parties (S, V, MP, C) have filed a <strong>coordinated counter-motion wave</strong> of 20 motions against 9 Tidö-government propositions in a 72-hour window (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17). The dominant battleground is the Extra ändringsbudget 2026 (prop 236) drivmedelsskatt, attracting motions from all three left-bloc parties (S/V/MP). The wave is concentrated in three utskott — <strong>FiU</strong> (economy), <strong>SfU</strong> (migration), <strong>SoU</strong> (health) — mirroring the salience hierarchy heading into the 2026 election. Sverigedemokraterna's complete absence from the counter-motion set is the single most structurally revealing signal: SD remains fully Tidö-aligned, foreclosing any opposition-from-right scenario on these bills.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10)<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>DIW tier</th><th>Why it matters</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>HD024082 (S)</td><td>L3</td><td>S-partiets motion mot drivmedelsbudget — largest opposition party on the single most election-salient economic measure (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>HD024098 (MP)</td><td>L2+</td><td>MP: avslag drivmedelsbudget — climate counter-narrative anchor (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>HD024092 (V)</td><td>L2+</td><td>V: avslag drivmedelsbudget — distributional counter-framing (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>HD024090 (V)</td><td>L2+</td><td>V: avslag utvisning vid brott — rule-of-law flashpoint (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>HD024096 (MP)</td><td>L2+</td><td>MP: förbud export av krigsmateriel — foreign-policy divergence (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>HD024097 (MP)</td><td>L2</td><td>MP: avslag utvisning p.g.a. brott (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>HD024089 (C)</td><td>L2</td><td>C: mottagandelag — municipal economic aid (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>HD024078 (S)</td><td>L2</td><td>S: brottsofferlag — rights framework (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>HD024081 (S)</td><td>L2</td><td>S: medicinsk kompetens — 12 kap. avslag (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a>)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>HD024093 (C)</td><td>L2</td><td>C: cybersäkerhetscenter — institutional design (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Ranking robust under ±1 tier perturbation — drivmedel cluster remains top by weight-of-evidence regardless of scoring adjustment. Rank sensitivity is formalised in <code>significance-scoring.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>The counter-motion flow decomposes into four behaviour signatures:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Coordinated trilateral (S/V/MP)</strong> on Tidö budget (prop 236) and Tidö justice/migration package (prop 235, prop 215, prop 229, prop 222). <strong>Admiralty: B2</strong> (usually reliable open-source confirmed by cross-party filing pattern).</li>
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a cl
 <li><strong>Centre-track reform-not-reject</strong> by C across five bills (215, 216, 222, 223, 229, 235) — C consistently motions for procedural tightening rather than outright avslag. Signals C's positioning as the "responsible alternative" for bourgeois-curious voters. <strong>Admiralty: B2</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>SD silence</strong> — zero counter-motions from SD despite SD being the largest party by 2022 vote share and formal non-member of Tidö government. Full coalition discipline intact. <strong>Admiralty: A1</strong>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-area-heat-map">Policy-area heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-area-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-area-heat-map">Policy-area heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-area-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     A[Prop 236&#x3C;br/>Drivmedelsbudget] -->|3 motions: S,V,MP| B(FiU — top salience)
@@ -377,14 +377,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-area-heat-map">Policy-area heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style L fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style N fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style P fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments-preview">Key judgments preview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-preview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments-preview">Key judgments preview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-preview"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>KJ-1 [HIGH]</strong>: The S-led drivmedel counter-motion (HD024082) positions S as the fiscal anchor of a potential red-green coalition in 2026 — S frames the regeringsproposition not as a tax cut but as a climate-policy regression.</li>
 <li><strong>KJ-2 [HIGH]</strong>: The MP vapenexport motion (HD024096) creates a narrow but durable left-bloc cleavage — S has not filed a parallel motion, preserving S's Nato-era defence-industry consensus with M/KD.</li>
 <li><strong>KJ-3 [MEDIUM]</strong>: SD silence on prop 235 (utvisning) indicates SD consents to the Tidö formulation; no right-flank pressure for harsher language, meaning the Regering's immigration package faces no right-critique.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Full judgments, uncertainty and drivers → <code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>. Forward triggers → <code>forward-indicators.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Headline (EN)</strong>: "Opposition Files 20-Motion Counter-Wave Against Tidö Budget, Justice Package"</li>
 <li><strong>Headline (SV)</strong>: "Oppositionen svarar med 20 motioner mot Tidö-budget och rättspaket"</li>
@@ -394,36 +394,36 @@ <h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-Recommended Article Metadata<a cl
 <hr>
 <p><em>Sources: riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code> (2026-04-24T01:05:50Z); all dok_id verifiable at data.riksdagen.se.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Opposition filed <strong>20 motions across 9 Tidö bills in 3 days (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17)</strong>, with <strong>zero SD counter-motions</strong>. The pattern reveals disciplined Tidö support on the government side and fragmented-but-parallel opposition on the other. Tidö retains procedural majority (176/349 seats); passage of most bills intact is the most likely outcome (~55%), but election-cycle amplification makes the motion content a narrative-shaping instrument for 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact">KJ-1 — Tidö discipline remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact">KJ-1 — Tidö discipline remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-1--tidö-discipline-remains-intact"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>high confidence</strong> (Admiralty B2) that Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L = 176/349) will deliver all 9 Tidö bills to floor vote in 2026-05/06 with coalition parties voting Ja.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: Zero SD counter-motions in this wave; Tidö has passed every prior legislative package 2022–2026.
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: High (consistent evidence, long baseline).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-2 (coalition discipline).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified">KJ-2 — Opposition coordination is parallel, not unified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified">KJ-2 — Opposition coordination is parallel, not unified<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-2--opposition-coordination-is-parallel-not-unified"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>moderate confidence</strong> (B3) that opposition (S/V/MP/C) remains structurally fragmented; the 2.2 motions/bill density reflects parallel filings, not coordinated opposition.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: No co-signed motions; divergent framing (S fiscal-anchor, V distributional, MP ethical, C reform). Four-party convergence only on prop 216 healthcare.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Moderate (evidence consistent with null hypothesis also — see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a>).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-4 (opposition bloc dynamics).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience">KJ-3 — Drivmedel cluster has highest 2026 electoral salience<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience">KJ-3 — Drivmedel cluster has highest 2026 electoral salience<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-3--drivmedel-cluster-has-highest-2026-electoral-salience"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>moderate confidence</strong> (B3) that the prop 236 / drivmedel cluster (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>) will dominate post-summer 2026 election discourse.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: Three-party opposition convergence; SCB fuel-price indicators trending; rural/urban distributional cleavage aligned with existing S/V/MP base-building.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Moderate (economic-voting literature supports; salience depends on further ECB / oil-price trajectory).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-1 (election 2026 salience).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability">KJ-4 — Prop 216 is the bill with highest amendment probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability">KJ-4 — Prop 216 is the bill with highest amendment probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-4--prop-216-is-the-bill-with-highest-amendment-probability"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>low-moderate confidence</strong> (C3) that prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens — healthcare workforce) faces the highest probability of substantial amendment due to the four-party wave (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>) incl. C offering reform path.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: Only bill in the wave with opposition across all four opposition parties; SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner) has standing interest in kommun-sector workforce policy and may weigh in.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Low-Moderate (depends on SKR stance).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-3 (healthcare policy implementation risk).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis">KJ-5 — MP vapenexport framework opens new opposition axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis">KJ-5 — MP vapenexport framework opens new opposition axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kj-5--mp-vapenexport-framework-opens-new-opposition-axis"></a></h4>
 <p><em>We judge with <strong>low confidence</strong> (C4) that MP motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a> (ethical vapenexport framework) represents a durable new opposition axis that could fragment opposition further in 2026.</em></p>
 <p><strong>Basis</strong>: First substantive MP policy on defence-industry ethics in current mandatperiod; differentiates MP from S (silent) and V (softer framing); creates wedge with defence industry + Nato-alignment camp.<br>
 <strong>Analytic confidence</strong>: Low (single data point; dependent on media uptake).<br>
 <strong>PIR reference</strong>: PIR-5 (foreign policy positioning).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-level-calibration">Confidence-level calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-level-calibration"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-level-calibration">Confidence-level calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-level-calibration"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     KJ1[KJ-1 Tidö discipline&#x3C;br/>High B2] --> Assess([Overall&#x3C;br/>Moderate confidence])
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-level-calibration">Confidence-level calibration<a class=""
     style KJ3 fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style KJ4 fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style KJ5 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs">Priority Intelligence Requirements (standing PIRs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs">Priority Intelligence Requirements (standing PIRs)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong> — Does the drivmedel issue gain >5% public salience by summer 2026? (SCB / Novus surveys.)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong> — Does SD publicly dissent on any Tidö bill before floor vote? (Press monitoring.)</li>
@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-standing-pirs">Priority Intelligen
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong> — Does any Tidö party abstain on ändringsbudget vote for prop 236? (Kammarvote record.)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong> — Does V or MP receive +1% in next Novus following utvisning debate? (Polling.)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-analytic-caveats">Analytic caveats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-caveats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analytic-caveats">Analytic caveats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytic-caveats"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Motion-filing ≠ floor-vote outcome; all judgments are probabilistic.</li>
 <li>Baseline motion-density series (2018–2025) would strengthen KJ-2; flagged for acquisition (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a>).</li>
 <li>No classified sources used; all dok_ids verifiable on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-dissemination">Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dissemination"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dissemination">Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dissemination"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary audience: political analysts, journalists, policy researchers.</li>
 <li>Handoff: Next daily brief incorporates updates from utskott hearings.</li>
@@ -463,9 +463,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-dissemination">Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <p><em>ICD 203 standards applied: clear key judgments, explicit confidence, sourcing, caveats, alternative considered (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a>).</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>DIW (Dimension · Intensity · Weight) composite scoring per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a>. Composite = Political (30%) + Fiscal (20%) + Legal (15%) + Distributional (15%) + International (10%) + Electoral (10%).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions">Ranking table (all 20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions">Ranking table (all 20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -787,13 +787,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ranking-table-all-20-motions">Ranking table (all 20 motions)<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Party</th><th>Cluster</th><th align="right">Pol</th><th align="right">Fiscal</th><th align="right">Legal</th><th align="right">Dist</th><th align="right">Intl</th><th align="right">Elect</th><th align="right">DIW</th><th>Tier</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>HD024082</td><td>S</td><td>drivmedel</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">10</td><td align="right"><strong>8.05</strong></td><td>L3</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>HD024098</td><td>MP</td><td>drivmedel</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right"><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>HD024092</td><td>V</td><td>drivmedel</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right"><strong>7.35</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>HD024096</td><td>MP</td><td>krigsmateriel</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">10</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>6.10</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>HD024090</td><td>V</td><td>utvisning</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right"><strong>6.00</strong></td><td>L2+</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>MP</td><td>utvisning</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>5.35</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>HD024089</td><td>C</td><td>mottagandelag</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>5.65</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>HD024091</td><td>V</td><td>krigsmateriel</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>5.00</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>HD024081</td><td>S</td><td>medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right"><strong>5.65</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>HD024078</td><td>S</td><td>ersättningsregler</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.95</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">11</td><td>HD024093</td><td>C</td><td>cybersäkerhet</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>4.60</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">12</td><td>HD024087</td><td>MP</td><td>mottagandelag</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.90</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">13</td><td>HD024095</td><td>C</td><td>utvisning</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.45</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">14</td><td>HD024079</td><td>S</td><td>bosättning</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right"><strong>5.05</strong></td><td>L2</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">HD024079</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">15</td><td>HD024086</td><td>MP</td><td>bosättning</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.55</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">HD024086</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">16</td><td>HD024083</td><td>V</td><td>medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.60</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">17</td><td>HD024094</td><td>C</td><td>medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right"><strong>4.30</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">18</td><td>HD024085</td><td>MP</td><td>ersättningsregler</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>3.95</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">HD024085</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">19</td><td>HD024084</td><td>V</td><td>ersättningsregler</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">7</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>3.95</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">HD024084</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">20</td><td>HD024088</td><td>C</td><td>konsumentkredit</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">5</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>3.80</strong></td><td>L1</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Weight perturbation (±5% on each axis)</strong>: Top-5 ranking stable. HD024096 (krigsmateriel) rank sensitivity: drops to 6 if International weight reduced to 5%, rises to 3 if weighted 15%.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier cut-off (DIW ≥ 7.0 = L2+)</strong>: Three documents qualify — all three drivmedel motions. Robust finding.</li>
 <li><strong>Party-balance audit</strong>: Scores do not systematically favour any bloc — top-3 are S (1), MP (1), V (1). Audit trail in <code>methodology-reflection.md §Party neutrality arithmetic</code>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution">Mermaid — DIW tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution">Mermaid — DIW tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Significance — Political vs Electoral axis
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--diw-tier-distribution">Mermaid — DIW tier distribution<a c
     "HD024089 C mottag [5.65]": [0.55, 0.6]
     "HD024081 S med kompet [5.65]": [0.65, 0.6]
     style HD024082 fill:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-notes">Methodology notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-notes">Methodology notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Scale</strong>: Each axis 1–10. Weights documented in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/methodologies/ai-driven-analysis-guide.md"><code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code></a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Composite formula</strong>: <code>DIW = 0.30·Pol + 0.20·Fiscal + 0.15·Legal + 0.15·Dist + 0.10·Intl + 0.10·Elect</code>.</li>
@@ -822,9 +822,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-methodology-notes">Methodology notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <hr>
 <p><em>Evidence: every row cites a verifiable <code>dok_id</code> resolvable via <code>get_dokument</code>. Source: riksdag-regering MCP.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Analyses anticipated media framing across Swedish outlets for the 9-bill + 20-motion cluster.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet">Expected framing by outlet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet">Expected framing by outlet<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-expected-framing-by-outlet"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-expected-framing-by-outlet">Expected framing by outlet<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Outlet</th><th>Orientation</th><th>Likely frame</th><th>Evidence-framed motion</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DN — Dagens Nyheter</td><td>Centre-liberal</td><td>"Tidö pressar igenom — opposition splittrad"</td><td>All bills; emphasis on coordination failure</td></tr><tr><td>SvD — Svenska Dagbladet</td><td>Centre-right</td><td>"Oppositionen ger sig på reformagendan"</td><td>Focus on prop 216, prop 235</td></tr><tr><td>Aftonbladet</td><td>Social-democratic</td><td>"S tar fighten om drivmedel"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td>Expressen</td><td>Liberal-populist</td><td>"Asylpolitiken delar kammaren"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, prop 235</td></tr><tr><td>SR Ekot / SVT Rapport</td><td>Public-service neutral</td><td>Balanced per-bill coverage</td><td>All clusters</td></tr><tr><td>ETC</td><td>Vänster</td><td>"V kräver rättvisa — utvisning hård kritik"</td><td>V motions cluster</td></tr><tr><td>Riks / Samhällsnytt</td><td>SD-aligned</td><td>"Tidö håller linjen mot alla motstånd"</td><td>Zero SD motions as strength</td></tr><tr><td>Fokus</td><td>Nyhetsmagasin</td><td>Analys av Tidö-dynamiken</td><td>Cross-cluster</td></tr><tr><td>DI — Dagens Industri</td><td>Näringsliv-orienterat</td><td>"Vapenexportsystemet under tryck — MP motion"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-cluster-map">Frame cluster map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-cluster-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-cluster-map">Frame cluster map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-cluster-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Gov([Government success frame]) --> GovM[DN SvD Fokus]
@@ -908,32 +908,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-cluster-map">Frame cluster map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style Tactics fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Content fill:#8338ec,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style Wedge fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster">Framing vectors by motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-drivmedel-prop-236">Drivmedel (prop 236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-drivmedel-prop-236"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster">Framing vectors by motion cluster<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-framing-vectors-by-motion-cluster"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-drivmedel-prop-236">Drivmedel (prop 236)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-drivmedel-prop-236"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mobiliserande frame</strong> (S/V/MP): "Tidö väljer biltrafik över klimat" / "Skattesänkning på bekostnad av rurala vårdbehov"</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse frame</strong> (Tidö): "Sänkta drivmedelspriser hjälper vanliga familjer"</li>
 <li><strong>Neutral frame</strong> (SR): "Budget-effekten av drivmedelsänkningen — 2.5 mdkr"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-utvisning-prop-235">Utvisning (prop 235)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-utvisning-prop-235"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-utvisning-prop-235">Utvisning (prop 235)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-utvisning-prop-235"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Mobiliserande frame</strong> (V/MP): "Rättssäkerheten urholkas" / "Europas hårdaste utvisningslag"</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse frame</strong> (Tidö/SD): "Tidö levererar svensk asylreform"</li>
 <li><strong>Neutral frame</strong>: "Vad ändras konkret? Juridisk analys"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228">Krigsmateriel (prop 228)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228">Krigsmateriel (prop 228)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-krigsmateriel-prop-228"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>MP-frame</strong>: "Etisk kontroll av svenska vapen" (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>)</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse</strong>: "Försvarsindustrin viktig för svensk säkerhet"</li>
 <li><strong>Neutral</strong>: "Nuvarande kontrollsystem — hur fungerar det?"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216">Medicinsk kompetens (prop 216)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216">Medicinsk kompetens (prop 216)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-medicinsk-kompetens-prop-216"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>4-partsfronten</strong>: "Sällsynt enighet mot regeringens reform"</li>
 <li><strong>Motrörelse</strong>: "Snabb behandling av vårdpersonalbristen"</li>
 <li><strong>Kommunsektor-frame</strong>: "SKR bekymrad över finansiering"</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-social-media-framing-predictions">Social-media framing predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-framing-predictions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-social-media-framing-predictions">Social-media framing predictions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-social-media-framing-predictions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -975,14 +975,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-social-media-framing-predictions">Social-media framing predictions<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Platform</th><th>Expected framing dynamic</th><th>Amplification risk</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>X (Twitter)</td><td>Polarisering; dok_id-citations of motions; hashtag #Tidöfalls vs #Tidöholder</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>Facebook</td><td>Longer-form opinion in voter groups; rural vs urban split on drivmedel</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>Instagram</td><td>Civil-society mobilisering on utvisning, climate</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>TikTok</td><td>Generationsfrågor on housing, drivmedel, migration</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>LinkedIn</td><td>Näringsliv perspective on vapenexport, cybersäk</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td>Telegram</td><td>Konspirationsnarrativ risk on migration bills</td><td>Medium-High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-war-indicators">Frame-war indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-war-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-war-indicators">Frame-war indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-war-indicators"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Who defines "obstruction"</strong>: Tidö frames 20 motions as opposition obstruction; opposition frames as democratic oversight.</li>
 <li><strong>Who owns "drivmedel"</strong>: S fiscal-anchor frame vs Tidö "familjeekonomi" frame — contested.</li>
 <li><strong>Who owns "rättssäkerhet"</strong>: V/MP civil-rights frame vs Tidö "rättssäker utvisning" frame — contested.</li>
 <li><strong>SD frame absent</strong>: SD does not frame this wave; absence itself is a frame Tidö exploits as "disciplinerat stöd".</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism">Editorial recommendations (for riksdagsmonitor journalism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism">Editorial recommendations (for riksdagsmonitor journalism)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Identify each motion by dok_id in every article — avoid generic "opposition motion".</li>
 <li>Explain extra ändringsbudget procedure on prop 236 in plain language.</li>
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-editorial-recommendations-for-riksdagsmonitor-journalism">Editorial r
 <li>Do not over-claim "opposition coordination" — evidence supports parallel filing more than unified strategy.</li>
 <li>Give MP vapenexport framework its own dedicated explanation — underreported axis.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist">Counterspin and balance checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist">Counterspin and balance checklist<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>✓ Name every primary author by party</li>
 <li>✓ Link every dok_id to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a></li>
@@ -1002,9 +1002,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-counterspin-and-balance-checklist">Counterspin and balance checklist<
 <hr>
 <p><em>Media framing predictions based on historical outlet patterns 2014–2025. No individual journalist targeting — outlet-level orientation only.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Six-lens stakeholder analysis. Lenses: <strong>Government coalition</strong>, <strong>Opposition bloc</strong>, <strong>Business/industry</strong>, <strong>Civil society</strong>, <strong>Voters/regional</strong>, <strong>Foreign/EU</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-matrix">Stakeholder matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-matrix">Stakeholder matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-matrix">Stakeholder matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder</th><th>Interest</th><th align="right">Power</th><th>Position</th><th>Named actor(s)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Regering (M-KD-L)</strong></td><td>Pass 9 bills intact</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Defend Tidö package</td><td>Ulf Kristersson (M) PM; finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M)</td><td>Tidö-avtal; <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>SD (Tidö support)</strong></td><td>Lock in Tidö; prepare 2026</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Silent support; no counter-motions</td><td>Jimmie Åkesson (SD)</td><td><code>get_motioner</code> result (0 SD)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Election-cycle positioning; fiscal anchor</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Constructive counter on fiscal; silent on vapenexport</td><td>Mikael Damberg (S) finansp; Ardalan Shekarabi (S) migration; Fredrik Lundh Sammeli (S) SoU; Joakim Järrebring (S) CU</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">HD024079</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>V</strong></td><td>Distributional justice; civil rights</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Full avslag on welfare/utvisning bills</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar (V) ordf; Tony Haddou (V) migration; Håkan Svenneling (V) UU; Karin Rågsjö (V) SoU; Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez (V) CU</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">HD024084</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>MP</strong></td><td>Climate; foreign-policy ethics</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Avslag fiscal; full vapenexport ban; rule-of-law</td><td>Janine Alm Ericson (MP); Jacob Risberg (MP); Annika Hirvonen (MP); Ulrika Westerlund (MP); Leila Ali Elmi (MP)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">HD024086</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">HD024085</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>C</strong></td><td>Centrist reform; procedural tightening</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Reform-not-reject on 5 bills</td><td>Christofer Bergenblock (C) SoU; Alireza Akhondi (C) CU; Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) SfU/FöU; Mikael Larsson (C) FöU</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Defence industry</strong></td><td>Export clarity</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Oppose MP ban (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>)</td><td>SOFF (Säkerhets- och försvarsföretagen), Saab</td><td><a href="https://soff.se/">soff.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Klimatnätverk / civil society</strong></td><td>Back fuel-tax protection</td><td align="right">Low-Medium</td><td>Support MP/V motions</td><td>Klimatriksdagen, Naturskyddsföreningen</td><td><a href="https://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/">naturskyddsforeningen.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Kommunsektor (SKR)</strong></td><td>Fiscal certainty on kommun-vård</td><td align="right">High</td><td>Neutral-to-worried on prop 216</td><td>SKR (Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner)</td><td><a href="https://skr.se/">skr.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Rural voters</strong></td><td>Fuel-price relief</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Favour prop 236 regardless of opposition</td><td>—</td><td>SCB KPI rural (<a href="https://www.scb.se/">scb.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Migration-sector civil society</strong></td><td>Counter utvisning regime</td><td align="right">Low-Medium</td><td>Ally with V/MP on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td><td>Röda Korset, Amnesty Sverige</td><td><a href="https://www.amnesty.se/">amnesty.se</a>, <a href="https://www.rodakorset.se/">rodakorset.se</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>EU (Commission, Member States)</strong></td><td>Compatibility of utvisning with ECHR/EU law</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Silent-monitoring</td><td>DG Home; Nordic partners</td><td><a href="https://ec.europa.eu/">ec.europa.eu</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Media ecosystem</strong></td><td>Stories for election cycle</td><td align="right">Medium</td><td>Amplify drivmedel, utvisning, krigsmateriel</td><td>DN, SvD, SR, SVT</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-interestpower-grid">Interest/Power grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interestpower-grid"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-interestpower-grid">Interest/Power grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-interestpower-grid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Stakeholder Interest × Power
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-interestpower-grid">Interest/Power grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     "Migration CS": [0.70, 0.35]
     "EU": [0.50, 0.70]
     "Media": [0.65, 0.65]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     Tidö([Regering M-KD-L]) -->|coalition| SD
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style V fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style MP fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style C fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-winners-and-losers">Winners and losers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners-and-losers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winners-and-losers">Winners and losers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners-and-losers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1245,9 +1245,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-winners-and-losers">Winners and losers<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 <hr>
 <p><em>Every named actor is a public officeholder or public-interest organisation. GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) — data made manifestly public by data subjects.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Watch-list of ≥10 dated indicators that will validate, refute, or update judgments from this analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22">Near-term indicators (next 4 weeks, 2026-04-24 → 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22">Near-term indicators (next 4 weeks, 2026-04-24 → 2026-05-22)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-near-term-indicators-next-4-weeks-2026-04-24--2026-05-22">Near-term i
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Trigger date</th><th>Source</th><th>Updates KJ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>First utskott hearing on prop 236 scheduled</td><td>First FiU calendar entry</td><td>+7d (~2026-05-01)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/finansutskottet</a></td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>SD public comment on any Tidö bill</td><td>First press release from SD press office</td><td>+14d (~2026-05-08)</td><td><a href="https://sverigedemokraterna.se/">sverigedemokraterna.se</a></td><td>KJ-1, H3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>SKR formal comment on prop 216</td><td>First published brief on healthcare workforce</td><td>+14d (~2026-05-08)</td><td><a href="https://skr.se/">skr.se</a></td><td>KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>First kammardebatt on prop 236</td><td>Scheduled kammardebatt</td><td>+21d (~2026-05-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se calendar</a></td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>SOFF response to MP vapenexport framework</td><td>First public statement</td><td>+21d (~2026-05-15)</td><td><a href="https://soff.se/">soff.se</a></td><td>KJ-5</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17">Mid-term indicators (4–12 weeks, 2026-05-22 → 2026-07-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17">Mid-term indicators (4–12 weeks, 2026-05-22 → 2026-07-17)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mid-term-indicators-412-weeks-2026-05-22--2026-07-17">Mid-term indica
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Trigger date</th><th>Source</th><th>Updates KJ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>FiU betänkande on prop 236 published</td><td>Betänkande publication</td><td>+5 weeks (~2026-05-29)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/finansutskottet/">riksdagen.se/FiU</a></td><td>KJ-1, KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>SfU betänkande on prop 235</td><td>Publication</td><td>+6 weeks (~2026-06-05)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/socialforsakringsutskottet/">riksdagen.se/SfU</a></td><td>KJ-1</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>SoU betänkande on prop 216</td><td>Publication (looking for amendment language)</td><td>+6 weeks (~2026-06-05)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/utskotten/socialutskottet/">riksdagen.se/SoU</a></td><td>KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>Kammarvote on prop 236</td><td>Final ja/nej/avstår count</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/arende/">riksdagen.se voteringar</a></td><td>KJ-1, KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>Kammarvote on prop 235</td><td>Final count</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se voteringar</a></td><td>KJ-1</td></tr><tr><td align="right">11</td><td>Kammarvote on prop 216</td><td>Final count + any amendment</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td><a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se voteringar</a></td><td>KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td align="right">12</td><td>Any Tidö MP abstain on ändringsbudget vote</td><td>Single abstention</td><td>+8 weeks (~2026-06-15)</td><td>Kammarvote record</td><td>KJ-1, S3</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13">Long-term indicators (12+ weeks, toward 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13">Long-term indicators (12+ weeks, toward 2026-09-13)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-long-term-indicators-12-weeks-toward-2026-09-13">Long-term indicators
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Threshold</th><th>Trigger date</th><th>Source</th><th>Updates KJ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">13</td><td>Novus/Demoskop issue-salience update on drivmedel</td><td>Drivmedel in top 3 voter issues</td><td>~2026-07-31</td><td>Polling publications</td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">14</td><td>S party congress economic platform</td><td>Fiscal-anchor framing of drivmedel motion</td><td>2026-08-15 (est.)</td><td><a href="https://www.socialdemokraterna.se/">socialdemokraterna.se</a></td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td align="right">15</td><td>Almedalen vecka party speeches</td><td>Motion content incorporation</td><td>2026-07-06..2026-07-12</td><td>Almedalens programme</td><td>KJ-3, KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td align="right">16</td><td>MP vapenexport framework — policy paper</td><td>Formal MP manifesto language</td><td>2026-08-15 (est.)</td><td><a href="https://www.mp.se/">mp.se</a></td><td>KJ-5</td></tr><tr><td align="right">17</td><td>Election 2026-09-13 result</td><td>Final seat distribution</td><td>2026-09-13</td><td><a href="https://www.val.se/">val.se</a></td><td>All KJs</td></tr><tr><td align="right">18</td><td>Post-election coalition formation</td><td>Regering formed / fails</td><td>2026-09..2026-10</td><td><a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a></td><td>Scenario set</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-trigger-response-mapping">Trigger-response mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-response-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-trigger-response-mapping">Trigger-response mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-trigger-response-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-trigger-response-mapping">Trigger-response mapping<a class="" aria-hi
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>If indicator fires</th><th>Expected action (next analysis pipeline)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>#2 SD breaks silence</td><td>Elevate H3 to Moderate; re-score scenarios</td></tr><tr><td>#3 SKR formal concern</td><td>Upgrade KJ-4 to Moderate-High</td></tr><tr><td>#9 prop 236 passes intact</td><td>Confirm KJ-1; reduce S2 probability</td></tr><tr><td>#9 prop 236 fails</td><td>Upgrade S3 scenario to dominant; major re-analysis</td></tr><tr><td>#11 prop 216 amendment passes</td><td>Confirm KJ-4; validate 4-party coordination hypothesis</td></tr><tr><td>#12 Tidö abstention</td><td>Immediate triage; S3 scenario update</td></tr><tr><td>#17 L below 4%</td><td>Trigger post-election coalition re-analysis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-coverage">PIR coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-coverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-coverage">PIR coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-coverage"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-coverage">PIR coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>PIR</th><th>Covered by indicators</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PIR-1 Election 2026 salience</td><td>#13, #14, #15, #17</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-2 SD coalition discipline</td><td>#2, #12, #9/10/11</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-3 Healthcare implementation</td><td>#3, #8, #11</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-4 Opposition bloc dynamics</td><td>#6, #7, #8, #15</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-5 Foreign policy positioning</td><td>#5, #16</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-6 Procedural integrity</td><td>#9, #12</td></tr><tr><td>PIR-7 Polling shift</td><td>#13</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-update-cadence">Update cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-update-cadence"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-update-cadence">Update cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-update-cadence"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Next full re-run: 2026-05-15 (after 3 weeks of indicator data).</li>
 <li>Interim spot-check: +7d (first utskott calendar entry).</li>
@@ -1524,9 +1524,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-update-cadence">Update cadence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <p><em>All 18 indicators have concrete dates or conditions + public verifiable sources. Forward-looking ≠ predictive.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Three futures for the 9 Tidö bills (prop 214, 215, 216, 222, 223, 228, 229, 235, 236) given the motion wave. Probabilities sum to 100%.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-overview">Scenario overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-overview">Scenario overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-overview"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-overview">Scenario overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th align="right">Probability</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 — Tidö holds, bills pass intact</td><td align="right">55%</td><td align="center">Moderate (Admiralty B2)</td><td>60–90 days</td></tr><tr><td>S2 — Partial amendment, 2 bills fall</td><td align="right">30%</td><td align="center">Moderate (B3)</td><td>60–90 days</td></tr><tr><td>S3 — Coalition stress, extra-budget vote fails</td><td align="right">15%</td><td align="center">Low (C3)</td><td>60–180 days</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-s1--tidö-holds-55">S1 — Tidö holds (55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--tidö-holds-55"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-s1--tidö-holds-55">S1 — Tidö holds (55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s1--tidö-holds-55"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: All 9 bills adopted with minor utskott amendments. Tidö 176/349 seats prove durable despite fragmented opposition.</p>
 <p><strong>Indicators (watch list)</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-s1--tidö-holds-55">S1 — Tidö holds (55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li>Election 2026 runs on completed Tidö record.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Tidö discipline across 2025–2026 (<a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>); zero SD counter-motions on this wave (dok_id manifest).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-s2--partial-amendment-30">S2 — Partial amendment (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--partial-amendment-30"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-s2--partial-amendment-30">S2 — Partial amendment (30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s2--partial-amendment-30"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: 2 of 9 bills substantially amended or withdrawn. Likely candidates: prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens — 4-party wave incl. C) and prop 236 (drivmedel — fiscal amplification).</p>
 <p><strong>Indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-s2--partial-amendment-30">S2 — Partial amendment (30%)<a class="" a
 <li>Tidö survives but at narrative cost entering 2026 campaign.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: C filed 5 motions including reform-not-reject on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>; 4-party convergence on prop 216.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15">S3 — Coalition stress / extra-budget fails (15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15">S3 — Coalition stress / extra-budget fails (15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget route used for prop 236 fails; at least one Tidö party abstains. Triggers ordningsfråga and possible förtroendeomröstning.</p>
 <p><strong>Indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-s3--coalition-stress--extra-budget-fails-15">S3 — Coalition stress
 <li>MP/V gain mobilisation headroom.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Historical pattern — minority+support coalitions rarely complete without 1 stress event per mandatperiod. Tidö has been unusually stable 2022–2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-tree">Decision tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-tree"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-tree">Decision tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-tree"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Now([2026-04-24&#x3C;br/>20 motions filed]) --> UtskHear[Utskott hearings&#x3C;br/>May 2026]
@@ -1622,13 +1622,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-tree">Decision tree<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
     style S1Path fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style S2Path fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style S3Path fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario probability distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-distribution">Scenario probability distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-distribution"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 pie title Scenario probabilities (sum = 100%)
     "S1 Tidö holds" : 55
     "S2 Partial amendment" : 30
     "S3 Coalition stress" : 15</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find">Early-warning indicators (F3EAD Disseminate → Find)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find">Early-warning indicators (F3EAD Disseminate → Find)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1681,9 +1681,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-early-warning-indicators-f3ead-disseminate--find">Early-warning indic
 <p><em>Probabilities are analyst judgements with documented evidence; horizon 60–180 days to kammarvote + förordnand. Bayesian update recommended after each utskott hearing.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Five-dimension risk register. <strong>L</strong> = Likelihood (1–5), <strong>I</strong> = Impact (1–5), <strong>R</strong> = L × I.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1800,20 +1800,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk description</th><th align="right">L</th><th align="right">I</th><th align="right"><strong>R</strong></th><th>Evidence</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-1</td><td>Political</td><td>Tidö passes prop 236 (drivmedel) substantially unchanged; opposition narrative loss locked in before summer</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>16</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, Tidö seat math 176/349 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td><td>Opposition pre-commits to budget-reversal commitment in 2026 manifesto</td></tr><tr><td>R-2</td><td>Political</td><td>V full-avslag on utvisning (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>) gets framed as "soft on crime" during election</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>12</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td><td>V pivots to proportionality/EU-law frame; coordinates with MP/C rule-of-law emphasis</td></tr><tr><td>R-3</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Committee backlog: 9 propositions + 20 motions in 6 utskott = congestion; betänkanden slip into autumn</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>9</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a> (FöU), <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a> (SoU)</td><td>Utskott-chair prioritisation; FiU gets lead track</td></tr><tr><td>R-4</td><td>Fiscal</td><td>Drivmedel tax cut blows budget anchor; S's constructive-reform framing (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) vindicated</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>12</strong></td><td>SCB statsfinansiellstatistik (<a href="https://www.scb.se/">scb.se</a>), KPI fuel indices</td><td>Konjunkturinstitutet scenario modelling cited in June debate</td></tr><tr><td>R-5</td><td>Corruption/Integrity</td><td>None detected in current motion wave — low background risk</td><td align="right">1</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right"><strong>2</strong></td><td>—</td><td>Standard Riksdagsreg hygiene</td></tr><tr><td>R-6</td><td>Foreign/Strategic</td><td>MP krigsmateriel motion (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>) gets instrumentalised in disinformation re: Swedish Nato commitment</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>8</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a></td><td>Clear MP messaging distinguishing ethical export policy from Nato alignment</td></tr><tr><td>R-7</td><td>Electoral</td><td>SD silence + Tidö discipline raises Tidö incumbent advantage above model baseline</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>12</strong></td><td>Zero SD motions filed (<code>get_motioner</code> result 2026-04-24)</td><td>S-V-MP-C coordinate manifest content before Almedalen 2026</td></tr><tr><td>R-8</td><td>Distributional</td><td>Fuel tax cut is regressive for ecology but progressive for commuters; opposition argues both and risks contradiction</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>9</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a> (MP), <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a> (V)</td><td>Separate climate argument (MP) from distributional argument (V); avoid blending</td></tr><tr><td>R-9</td><td>Legal</td><td>Utvisning regime (prop 235) produces ECHR-compatibility challenge; rapid LR case</td><td align="right">2</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right"><strong>8</strong></td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a> Motivering, prop 235</td><td>Reserve analysis for betänkande hearing; cite MR-expert testimony</td></tr><tr><td>R-10</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget procedure compresses debate time → reduces opposition visibility</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right">3</td><td align="right"><strong>9</strong></td><td>FiU calendar, prop 236 special-budget route</td><td>Demand extended debate; file ordningsfråga</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading-risk chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in">Chain A — Drivmedel narrative lock-in<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-risk-chains">Cascading-risk chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-risk-chains"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in">Chain A — Drivmedel narrative lock-in<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-a--drivmedel-narrative-lock-in"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>R-1 (prop 236 passes) → R-4 (fiscal-anchor frame) → R-7 (Tidö incumbent advantage) → 2026 result
 </code></pre>
 <p>If R-1 materialises without effective opposition counter-framing, R-4 and R-7 compound. <strong>Posterior probability chain passes</strong>: 0.70 × 0.55 × 0.60 ≈ <strong>0.23</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame">Chain B — Utvisning rule-of-law frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame">Chain B — Utvisning rule-of-law frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-b--utvisning-rule-of-law-frame"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>R-2 (V framed soft on crime) → R-9 (ECHR challenge surfaces late) → 2027 judicial correction
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Posterior</strong>: 0.55 × 0.25 × 0.40 ≈ <strong>0.055</strong>. Low but election-relevant if V response is slow.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift">Chain C — Foreign policy drift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift">Chain C — Foreign policy drift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-chain-c--foreign-policy-drift"></a></h4>
 <pre><code>R-6 (MP krigsmateriel instrumentalised) → S-MP alignment breach → post-election coalition failure
 </code></pre>
 <p><strong>Posterior</strong>: 0.30 × 0.40 × 0.35 ≈ <strong>0.042</strong>. Non-negligible for 2026 government formation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map">Heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map">Heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Risk heat map — Likelihood × Impact
@@ -1834,7 +1834,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map">Heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
     "R-9 ECHR": [0.40, 0.80]
     "R-10 extra-budget compression": [0.60, 0.60]
     style R-1 fill:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian">Posterior-probability update (Bayesian)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian">Posterior-probability update (Bayesian)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian"></a></h3>
 <p>Prior <code>P(Tidö bills pass substantially unchanged) = 0.65</code> (structural coalition math).
 Likelihood observations:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-posterior-probability-update-bayesian">Posterior-probability update (
 <li>Extra-budget procedural route → raise posterior
 Posterior <code>P(pass | observations) ≈ 0.72</code>. Distribution: 72% pass substantially unchanged, 18% pass with marginal amendment, 6% significant amendment, 4% withdrawal or replacement.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-3-actionable-risks">Top 3 actionable risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-actionable-risks"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-actionable-risks">Top 3 actionable risks<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-actionable-risks"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R-1</strong> (R=16): Drivmedel narrative lock-in — highest combined score.</li>
 <li><strong>R-2</strong> (R=12): V soft-on-crime frame — reputational risk for V coalition value.</li>
@@ -1852,8 +1852,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-3-actionable-risks">Top 3 actionable risks<a class="" aria-hidden
 <hr>
 <p><em>Evidence standard: all scores substantiated by at least one <code>dok_id</code> or primary-source URL. Cross-reference → <code>threat-analysis.md</code> for adversary-perspective complement.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-executive-swot-grid">Executive SWOT grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-swot-grid"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-executive-swot-grid">Executive SWOT grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-swot-grid"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Opposition SWOT — Internal vs External
@@ -1869,43 +1869,43 @@ <h2 id="rm-executive-swot-grid">Executive SWOT grid<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     "Elect cleavage Tidö permanence": [0.80, 0.85]
     "SD Tidö lock-in": [0.80, 0.25]
     "Coalition math 349 seats": [0.85, 0.20]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis">S-1 · Coordinated trilateral framing on fiscal axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis">S-1 · Coordinated trilateral framing on fiscal axis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-1--coordinated-trilateral-framing-on-fiscal-axis"></a></h4>
 <p>Three left-bloc parties simultaneously filed motions against prop 2025/26:236 within 48 hours — S (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>), V (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>), MP (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>). Evidence: temporal clustering (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17), all filed in same utskott (FiU). Demonstrates operational coordination capacity for 2026 campaign.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor">S-2 · S positions as fiscal anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor">S-2 · S positions as fiscal anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-2--s-positions-as-fiscal-anchor"></a></h4>
 <p>S under Mikael Damberg (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) proposes constructive alternative rather than pure avslag — institutional competence signalling for 2026 government-formation credibility. Evidence: motion text calls for regeringen to "återkomma till riksdagen" with revised framework rather than rejecting outright.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly">S-3 · MP owns climate and vapenexport axes cleanly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly">S-3 · MP owns climate and vapenexport axes cleanly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-3--mp-owns-climate-and-vapenexport-axes-cleanly"></a></h4>
 <p>MP is the only party filing on prop 228 (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>) with a full export-ban proposition — gives MP unique ownership of two election-relevant frames (climate via drivmedel, ethics via vapenexport). Evidence: no parallel S or V motion proposing full ban.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile">S-4 · C differentiated centre-reform profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile">S-4 · C differentiated centre-reform profile<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-s-4--c-differentiated-centre-reform-profile"></a></h4>
 <p>C filed on 5 distinct propositions (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a>) with consistently procedural/reform language — maintains C as a non-Tidö bourgeois alternative.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame">W-1 · Absence of coordinated judicial-policy counter-frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame">W-1 · Absence of coordinated judicial-policy counter-frame<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-1--absence-of-coordinated-judicial-policy-counter-frame"></a></h4>
 <p>Opposition filed 3 motions on prop 235 (utvisning) but with fundamentally divergent lines: V wants full avslag (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>), MP wants partial avslag (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>), C wants systematik-krav (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a>). This is three parallel messages, not one — weakens narrative cohesion.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport">W-2 · S silence on vapenexport<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport">W-2 · S silence on vapenexport<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-2--s-silence-on-vapenexport"></a></h4>
 <p>S filed zero motions against prop 228 (krigsmateriel). Leaves MP (and partly V) to carry the line alone. A red-green coalition scenario requires S-MP alignment on foreign policy; this divergence will be used by Tidö parties in 2026 campaign framing.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare">W-3 · No cross-bloc bridge on welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare">W-3 · No cross-bloc bridge on welfare<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-3--no-cross-bloc-bridge-on-welfare"></a></h4>
 <p>Three motions on prop 216 (medicinsk kompetens) from S/V/C — but no sign of coordinated amendment package. Opposition is parallel, not integrated. Evidence: three distinct utskott filings with different legal pathways.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling">W-4 · Limited full-text signalling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling">W-4 · Limited full-text signalling<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-w-4--limited-full-text-signalling"></a></h4>
 <p>All 20 motions retrieved as metadata-only summaries at retrieval time; deeper textual coordination (wording overlap, shared legal analysis) cannot be verified at this resolution. Pass-2 remediation: prioritise <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> for P0/P1 documents in next run.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg">O-1 · Election-cycle narrative peg<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg">O-1 · Election-cycle narrative peg<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-1--election-cycle-narrative-peg"></a></h4>
 <p>Drivmedel is Sweden's most-polled cost-of-living issue in 2026 (SCB KPI-F fuel indices persistently salient). The S motion (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) can anchor a broader oppositions-own-the-economy narrative through summer.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235">O-2 · Rule-of-law debate on prop 235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235">O-2 · Rule-of-law debate on prop 235<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-2--rule-of-law-debate-on-prop-235"></a></h4>
 <p>Three opposition motions (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a>) collectively put proportionality/legal-certainty back on the agenda — creates coverage window for constitutional-committee (KU) scrutiny lines in opposition.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026">O-3 · Coalition demarcation for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026">O-3 · Coalition demarcation for 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-3--coalition-demarcation-for-2026"></a></h4>
 <p>The motion wave crystallises the S-V-MP-C quartet's distinct positions. Election debates can now reference concrete differentiation rather than abstract positioning.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility">O-4 · Committee-work visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility">O-4 · Committee-work visibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-o-4--committee-work-visibility"></a></h4>
 <p>With 6 different utskott touched (FiU, UU, SoU, SfU, CU, AU, FöU), opposition gains recurring media moments throughout the betänkande calendar — each utskott report surfaces the opposition line separately.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact">T-1 · Tidö arithmetic remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact">T-1 · Tidö arithmetic remains intact<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1--tidö-arithmetic-remains-intact"></a></h4>
 <p>M (68 seats) + SD (73) + KD (19) + L (16) = 176 seats vs 173-seat opposition. Motion wave does not alter coalition math. Evidence: Riksdag seat distribution 2022 baseline. <strong>Admiralty A1</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure">T-2 · SD lock-in removes right-flank pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure">T-2 · SD lock-in removes right-flank pressure<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2--sd-lock-in-removes-right-flank-pressure"></a></h4>
 <p>SD filed zero motions against any of the 9 propositions. This means there is no realistic path to Tidö amendment from internal-coalition dissent. Full base available via <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/voteringlista/?rm=2025/26">search_voteringar</a>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters">T-3 · Drivmedel tax cut is popular even among opposition voters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters">T-3 · Drivmedel tax cut is popular even among opposition voters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3--drivmedel-tax-cut-is-popular-even-among-opposition-voters"></a></h4>
 <p>KPI trend since 2022 makes fuel-price relief broadly popular. Opposition avslag position risks class-cleavage backlash (rural/commuter vs urban). The V full-avslag line (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>) carries distributional risk.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative">T-4 · Parallel bill flow crowds out narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative">T-4 · Parallel bill flow crowds out narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4--parallel-bill-flow-crowds-out-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p>The 9 propositions in one 72-hour motion window dilute media attention per bill — drivmedel may dominate, but prop 216 (kommun-vård) risks being under-covered.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings">TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings">TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1942,7 +1942,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-strategic-pairings">TOWS matrix (strategic pairings)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Leverage for</th><th>Exploit by</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1 × O1</td><td>S fiscal anchor + election narrative</td><td>S lead-story positioning on drivmedel; op-ed programme through May</td></tr><tr><td>S3 × O2</td><td>MP vapenexport + rule-of-law debate</td><td>MP as civil-liberties party bridges foreign-policy and domestic constitutionalism</td></tr><tr><td>W1 × T4</td><td>Divergent utvisning lines + narrative crowding</td><td>Risk: opposition self-dilutes on justice; requires unified spokesperson</td></tr><tr><td>S4 × O3</td><td>C differentiated + coalition demarcation</td><td>C targets bourgeois-curious M/L voters who reject SD but approve of Tidö economics</td></tr><tr><td>W2 × T2</td><td>S silence on vapenexport + SD lock-in</td><td>S's silence ensures Tidö defence-industry consensus holds regardless of MP pressure</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S/W pairing</strong>: S-1 (trilateral coord) is real only on fiscal; W-1 (divergent justice) shows it does not generalise. Coordination is issue-specific, not structural.</li>
 <li><strong>S/O</strong>: S-3 (MP clean ownership) × O-3 (coalition demarcation) strengthens a multi-party Left narrative where each party has a distinct role.</li>
@@ -1952,10 +1952,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <p><em>Evidence standard: every entry cites either a dok_id or primary-source URL. Source: riksdag-regering MCP <code>get_motioner</code> 2026-04-24T01:05:50Z.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: HIGH · <strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH (T-4, T-7) / MEDIUM (T-1, T-2, T-3, T-5) / LOW (T-6) · <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (B2 — multi-source motion-wave pattern, plausibility judgements per row).</p>
 <p>This analysis adopts the Political Threat Taxonomy — adversarial actors, techniques, and targets that could exploit or undermine the democratic process around this motion wave. <strong>This is NOT political opposition research</strong>; it is threat modelling against democratic legitimacy.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat ID</th><th>Actor class</th><th>Technique</th><th>Target</th><th align="right">Plausibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T-1</td><td>Foreign influence (state-linked)</td><td>Frame V avslag on utvisning (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>) as state-capture narrative</td><td>V voter base / centre swing</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-2</td><td>Foreign influence</td><td>Amplify MP krigsmateriel (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>) to depict Sweden as unreliable Nato ally</td><td>Nato discourse in Sweden + allies</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-3</td><td>Domestic extremist</td><td>Weaponise prop 235 debate to mobilise anti-migrant mobilisation</td><td>Public order / community safety</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-4</td><td>Disinformation (platform)</td><td>Mischaracterise S drivmedel motion (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>) as endorsing higher fuel tax</td><td>Rural/commuter voters</td><td align="right">High</td></tr><tr><td>T-5</td><td>Legitimate political (within rules)</td><td>Tidö parties frame coordinated motion wave as "obstruction" to legitimise procedural shortcuts</td><td>Democratic debate norms</td><td align="right">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>T-6</td><td>Cyber</td><td>Attempt to compromise Riksdag.se delivery of motion documents during debate window</td><td>Information integrity</td><td align="right">Low</td></tr><tr><td>T-7</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Utskott-chair use of extra-budget procedure (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">prop 236</a> FiU route) to compress opposition time</td><td>Deliberative quality</td><td align="right">High</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel">Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo on drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel">Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo on drivmedel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     Goal([Erode S credibility on fuel prices]) --> A[Mischaracterise HD024082]
@@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--t-4-disinfo-on-drivmedel">Attack tree — T-4 (disinfo o
     style Impact fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style A fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style B fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel">Kill chain — T-2 (Nato-alliance framing on krigsmateriel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel">Kill chain — T-2 (Nato-alliance framing on krigsmateriel)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     R[Reconnaissance&#x3C;br/>Identify MP motion HD024096] --> W[Weaponisation&#x3C;br/>Selective translation to EN]
@@ -2051,7 +2051,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain--t-2-nato-alliance-framing-on-krigsmateriel">Kill chain 
 
     style R fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Ob fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-style TTP mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-style TTP mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-mapping">MITRE-style TTP mapping<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tactic</th><th>Technique</th><th>Procedure (observed / plausible)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TA-Info-Manip</td><td>Selective quotation</td><td>Crop S motion to omit "återkomma till riksdagen" qualifier</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> text structure</td></tr><tr><td>TA-Delegitimise</td><td>Frame substitution</td><td>Label V avslag as "amnesti"</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td></tr><tr><td>TA-Polarise</td><td>Issue wedge</td><td>Rural vs urban on drivmedel</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td></tr><tr><td>TA-Amplify</td><td>Bot / coordinated inauthentic</td><td>Reshare cycles on X/Facebook during utskott hearings</td><td>riksdagen.se calendar</td></tr><tr><td>TA-Suppress</td><td>Procedural compression</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget route (prop 236)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> FiU timeline</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking">Adversary goals &#x26; cost/impact ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking">Adversary goals &#x26; cost/impact ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 quadrantChart
     title Threat ranking — Plausibility vs Impact
@@ -2111,14 +2111,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-adversary-goals--costimpact-ranking">Adversary goals &#x26; cost/impa
     "T-5 obstruction frame": [0.60, 0.60]
     "T-6 cyber Riksdag": [0.20, 0.80]
     "T-7 procedural compression": [0.85, 0.65]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-defensive-recommendations">Defensive recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-defensive-recommendations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-defensive-recommendations">Defensive recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-defensive-recommendations"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Against T-4</strong>: S and V independently publish plain-language explainers of their drivmedel motions within 72 hours of first debate; cite <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> and <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a> directly.</li>
 <li><strong>Against T-2</strong>: MP coordinates with Swedish embassy comms on English-language explanation of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>, distinguishing ethical-export framework from Nato alignment.</li>
 <li><strong>Against T-7</strong>: Opposition files ordningsfråga at extra-budget procedural votes; document compression in KU annual report.</li>
 <li><strong>Against T-3</strong>: Coordination with MSB (Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap) on monitoring extremist mobilisation around prop 235 debate windows (<a href="https://www.msb.se/">msb.se</a>).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-residual-threat-posture">Residual threat posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-threat-posture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-residual-threat-posture">Residual threat posture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-residual-threat-posture"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>High-plausibility / high-impact quadrant: T-4, T-2, T-7.</li>
 <li>Watch list next 30 days: platform-level content around drivmedel and utvisning debates.</li>
@@ -2128,17 +2128,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-residual-threat-posture">Residual threat posture<a class="" aria-hidd
 <p><em>This document models adversarial threats to democratic process around the motion wave — it is not an assessment of any specific party's motives. Source: threat framework + riksdag-regering MCP.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024078">HD024078<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024078"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024078-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024078 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion demanding broader kommun-sektor consultation before any reform to medicinsk legitimationsprocess. Flags risk that the Tidö proposition moves too fast without workforce-pipeline data.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-inferred">Key yrkanden (inferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-inferred"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-inferred">Key yrkanden (inferred)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-inferred"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Kommunsektor-samråd must precede final utformning.</li>
 <li>Socialstyrelsen kapacitet måste bekräftas.</li>
 <li>Begär återkomma till riksdagen med förslag.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW score</strong>: 6.8 (high — 4-party wave context)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / implementation risk / P1</li>
@@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><strong>Implementation risk</strong>: High for prop 216 overall (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination signal</strong>: Part of 4-party wave with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md">HD024083</a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md">HD024087</a>, <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md">HD024094</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Low probability of motion passage standalone; high influence on betänkande amendment text.</li>
 <li>Narrative value for S: fiscal-ansvarsfull + kommun-sektor ansvar framing.</li>
@@ -2154,24 +2154,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code> (riksdag-regering MCP).</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024079">HD024079<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024079"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024079 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: UU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 228 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion on proposed amendments to the swedish arms-export regime (prop 228). S frames as pragmatic support with amendment; not a ban.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Utvidgad transparens.</li>
 <li>ISP-kapacitet måste säkerställas.</li>
 <li>Återrapportering till UU årligen.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-1">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-1">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.2 (med-high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Defence / foreign-policy / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: S positions between MP ethical framework and Tidö status quo — centre-pragmatic.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination signal</strong>: Three-party cluster with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md">HD024091</a> (V) and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md">HD024096</a> (MP) — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Motion likely to be absorbed into betänkande as minority reservation.</li>
 <li>Clarifies S–MP policy distance.</li>
@@ -2179,48 +2179,48 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-1">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024080">HD024080<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024080"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024080 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024080.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: AU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 222 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion seeking amendments to ersättningsregler in prop 222. Focus on pensioner/sickness-benefit integrity.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-1">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-1">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-1"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Mildare trappor vid långvarig sjukfrånvaro.</li>
 <li>Administrativ förenkling.</li>
 <li>Bevaka pensionärsinkomst.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-2">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-2">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 4.1 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / labour / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: Targets segment E (pensioners, 22% of electorate, S-strong).</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md">HD024086</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-2">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Moderate salience; stable S-base motion.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024081">HD024081<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024081"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024081-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024081 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 235 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>S motion with rättssäkerhets-amendments to prop 235 utvisning reform. Not an avslag; a technical reform motion.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-2">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-2">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-2"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Domstolsprövning-tillgång måste säkerställas.</li>
 <li>Tidsramar för överklaganden rimliga.</li>
 <li>ECHR-kompatibilitet bekräftas.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-3">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-3">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.5 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / rule-of-law / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: S centrist positioning — accepts Tidö hardening framework but amends implementation.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md">HD024090</a> V full avslag and <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md">HD024097</a> MP reform.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Distinguishes S from both Tidö and V on this axis.</li>
 <li>Retains centre-right swing voter potential.</li>
@@ -2228,18 +2228,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-3">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024082">HD024082<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024082"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024082 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: S · <strong>Committee</strong>: FiU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 236 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Lead motion of the entire wave.</strong> S positions as fiscal-anchor — challenges extra ändringsbudget-finansieringen för drivmedel-reduktion utan tydlig motsvarande besparing.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-3">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-3">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-3"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Riksdagen begär regeringens fullständiga finansieringsförslag.</li>
 <li>FiU måste granska makroekonomisk effekt.</li>
 <li>Extra ändringsbudget-proceduren ifrågasätts.</li>
 <li>Återkomma till riksdagen.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-4">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-4">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 8.4 (highest in wave)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Fiscal / macroeconomic / P0</li>
@@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis-4">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <li><strong>Electoral relevance</strong>: Segment A (rural, 18%) + E (pensioners, 22%) = 40% of electorate mobilisation potential (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md">voter-segmentation.md</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Lead of 3-party cluster with <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md">HD024092</a> (V) + <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md">HD024098</a> (MP).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-4">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-4">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Highest 2026 electoral salience of any single motion in the wave.</li>
 <li>Procedural challenge to ändringsbudget route creates S3 scenario trigger.</li>
@@ -2256,24 +2256,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-4">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>. Primary campaign-narrative document.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024083">HD024083<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024083"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024083-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024083 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion calling for avslag on prop 216 absent funded workforce pipeline; argues the reform erodes kommun-sector capacity.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-4">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-4">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-4"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Riksdagen avslår prop 216.</li>
 <li>Begär återkomma med finansierat förslag.</li>
 <li>Kommunsektor-ekonomisk analys krävs.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-5">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-5">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.4 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / implementation risk / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Political significance</strong>: V base mobilisation on public-sector worker rights.</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Part of <strong>4-party wave</strong> on prop 216 with S/MP/C — strongest coordination of entire motion wave.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-5">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-5">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Binary avslag position; differs from S amendment approach.</li>
 <li>Raises SoU betänkande amendment probability.</li>
@@ -2281,115 +2281,115 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-5">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024084">HD024084<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024084"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024084-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024084 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: CU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 223 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion demands stricter konsumentskydd än prop 223 som drafted; specifically högre räntetak and stricter marknadsföringsförbud.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-5">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-5">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-5"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Lägre räntetak än regeringens förslag.</li>
 <li>Marknadsföringsförbud för snabblån.</li>
 <li>Förstärkt Konsumentverket-tillsyn.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-6">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-6">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 4.4 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Consumer protection / civil rights / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with C <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md">HD024088</a> — 2-party.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-6">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-6">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Technical policy motion; low campaign salience but stable V-base signal.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024085">HD024085<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024085"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024085-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024085 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: FöU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 214 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion on prop 214 cyber reform — adds privacy/civil-liberty dimensions to cybersäkerhetsreformen.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-6">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-6">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-6"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Integritetsskydd måste balansera NIS2-implementering.</li>
 <li>PTS-tillsyn oberoende.</li>
 <li>Medborgarrättsligt perspektiv i utformning.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-7">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-7">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.8 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Cyber / civil rights / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Paired with C <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md">HD024095</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-7">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-7">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Niche but differentiating; positions MP on civil-liberties axis.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024086">HD024086<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024086"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024086 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: AU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 222 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-15</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-8">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-8"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion on ersättningsreformen; adds jämställdhets- and miljö-dimensioner till arbetslöshets-/sjukersättning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-7">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-7">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-7"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Jämställd utformning av trappor.</li>
 <li>Omställningsstöd i klimatomställning ska ingå.</li>
 <li>Återkomma med förslag.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-8">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-8">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-8"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.9 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / labour / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 2-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md">HD024080</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-8">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-8">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-8"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Moderate salience; differentiates MP on klimat+omställning integration.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024087">HD024087<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024087"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024087 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-9">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-9"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion mot prop 216 — kräver klimatkompetens-integration i hälso- och sjukvårdsutbildning; betonar jämlikhet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-8">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-8"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-8">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-8"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Klimatkompetens i utbildningsreformen.</li>
 <li>Regional jämlik tillgång.</li>
 <li>Icke-diskriminering i legitimationsprocess.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-9">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-9">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-9"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 4.8 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / climate integration / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: <strong>4-party wave</strong> with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md">HD024078</a>, V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md">HD024083</a>, C <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md">HD024094</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-9">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-9">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-9"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Specialised angle; contributes to wave coordination signal but unique framing.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024088">HD024088<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024088"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024088-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024088 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: CU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 223 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-10">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-10"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion med reform-inte-avslag stance på prop 223 — fokus på småföretagens kreditgivning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-9">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-9"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-9">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-9"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>SME-anpassning av regelverket.</li>
 <li>Digital tillsyn.</li>
 <li>Utvärdering efter 24 månader.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-10">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-10">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-10"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.6 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Consumer / SME / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 2-party with V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md">HD024084</a> — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-10">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-10">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-10"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Positioning: centre-reform, not oppositionell avslag.</li>
 <li>Part of C 5-motion differentiation strategy.</li>
@@ -2397,23 +2397,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-10">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024089">HD024089<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024089"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024089 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 229 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-11">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-11"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på kommunal ersättningsnivå i prop 229 mottagandelag — krever kommunkompensation vid kapacitetskrav.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-10">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-10">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-10"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Full kommunersättning.</li>
 <li>Regional fördelningsmekanism.</li>
 <li>SKR-samråd före ikraftträdande.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-11">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-11">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-11"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 5.4 (medium-high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / kommun economy / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Solo C motion (no other party matches).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-11">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-11">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-11"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Plays kommunsektor-expertise card — C's traditional strength.</li>
 <li>Links mottagandelag to <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md">HD024094</a> (healthcare workforce) thematically.</li>
@@ -2421,23 +2421,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-11">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024090">HD024090<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024090"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024090 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 235 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-12">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-12"></a></h3>
 <p>V full avslag på prop 235 — ECHR-kompatibilitet ifrågasatt, rättssäkerhetsrisk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-11">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-11"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-11">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-11"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Riksdagen avslår prop 235 i sin helhet.</li>
 <li>Begär ECHR-analys.</li>
 <li>Rättspraxis-sammanställning.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-12">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-12">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-12"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 7.2 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / human-rights / P0</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md">HD024081</a>, MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md">HD024097</a> — <strong>divergent</strong> (S amendment vs V avslag vs MP reform).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-12">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-12">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-12"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Maximal differentiation V vs Tidö on migration.</li>
 <li>Mobilises V base but may alienate swing voters.</li>
@@ -2445,46 +2445,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-12">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024091">HD024091<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024091"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024091 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: UU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 228 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-16</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-13">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-13"></a></h3>
 <p>V full avslag på prop 228 — vapenexport-liberalisering avvisas principiellt.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-12">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-12"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-12">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-12"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Avslag.</li>
 <li>Översyn av svensk vapenexportpolicy.</li>
 <li>UN Arms Trade Treaty-stärkning.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-13">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-13">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-13"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.8 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Defence / foreign-policy / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md">HD024079</a>, MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md">HD024096</a> — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-13">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-13">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-13"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V-base signal on pacifism + anti-imperialist framing.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024092">HD024092<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024092"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024092 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: V · <strong>Committee</strong>: FiU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 236 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-14">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-14"></a></h3>
 <p>V motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktionen — begär förstärkt kollektivtrafik i stället.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-13">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-13"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-13">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-13"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Avvisning av drivmedels-reduktionsprincipen.</li>
 <li>Motförslag: förstärkt regional kollektivtrafik.</li>
 <li>Klimatskatteprincip bevaras.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-14">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-14">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-14"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 7.6 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Fiscal / climate / P0</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md">HD024082</a> lead + MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md">HD024098</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-14">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-14">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-14"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V differentierar sig från S finanspolitisk framing → klimatmoralisk framing.</li>
 <li>Urban segment (D, 20%) mobilisation potential.</li>
@@ -2492,46 +2492,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-14">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024093">HD024093<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024093"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024093-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024093 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: TU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 215 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-15">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-15"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på digitaliseringsreformen — fokus på rural bredbandsutbyggnad och SME-access.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-14">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-14"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-14">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-14"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Geografisk jämlikhet i utrullning.</li>
 <li>SME-skräddarsydda e-tjänster.</li>
 <li>PTS-rapportering per kvartal.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-15">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-15">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-15"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.3 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Digital / regional / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: Solo C motion.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-15">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-15">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-15"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Rural-voter positioning (segment A overlap).</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024094">HD024094<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024094"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024094-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024094 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: SoU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 216 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-16">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-16"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på prop 216 — regional jämlik tillgång, SKR-samråd, kommunekonomisk analys.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-15">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-15">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-15"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Regional tillgänglighet.</li>
 <li>SKR-samråd.</li>
 <li>Kommunersättning vid ny capacitetsförfrågan.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-16">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-16">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-16"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 5.0 (medium)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Welfare / kommun / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: <strong>4-party wave</strong> with S/V/MP — strongest coordination signal of the wave.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-16">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-16">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-16"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>C sätter kommun-sektor expertise-stämpel på wave.</li>
 <li>Lägger grunden till SoU betänkande-amendment.</li>
@@ -2539,92 +2539,92 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-16">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024095">HD024095<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024095"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024095 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: C · <strong>Committee</strong>: FöU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 214 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-17">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-17"></a></h3>
 <p>C motion på prop 214 cybersäkerhet — SME-fokus + implementation cost.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-16">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-16"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-16">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-16"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>SME-anpassning av NIS2.</li>
 <li>Implementeringskostnad till små företag begränsad.</li>
 <li>Utvärdering efter 24 månader.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-17">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-17">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-17"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 3.1 (medium-low)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Cyber / SME / P2</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 2-party with MP <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md">HD024085</a> — divergent content.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-17">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-17">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-17"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Low salience; stable reform-framing signature C pursues.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024096">HD024096<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024096"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024096 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: UU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 228 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-18">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-18">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-18"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion på prop 228 vapenexport — etisk ramverks-amendment, klimatdimension.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-17">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-17"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-17">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-17"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Etisk ramverk före export-liberalisering.</li>
 <li>Klimatsäkerhetsperspektiv integreras.</li>
 <li>Demokratiklausul stärks.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-18">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-18">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-18"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 5.8 (medium-high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Defence / ethics / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md">HD024079</a>, V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md">HD024091</a> — divergent.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-18">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-18">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-18"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Distinguishes MP on etisk/klimat integration.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024097">HD024097<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024097"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024097 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: SfU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 235 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-19">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-19">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-19"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion på prop 235 — reform-ansats, ECHR-kompatibilitet säkerställs, humanitära hänsyn.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-18">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-18"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-18">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-18"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>ECHR-analys.</li>
 <li>Humanitära skyddsregler.</li>
 <li>Återkomma med reformerat förslag.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-19">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-19">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-19"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 6.4 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Migration / human-rights / P1</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md">HD024081</a>, V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md">HD024090</a> — divergent.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-19">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-19">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-19"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Positions MP mellan S amendment och V avslag.</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>.</em></p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd024098">HD024098<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd024098"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD024098 · <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">riksdagen.se</a> · <strong>Party</strong>: MP · <strong>Committee</strong>: FiU · <strong>Responds to</strong>: Prop 236 · <strong>Filed</strong>: 2026-04-17</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-20">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-20">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-20"></a></h3>
 <p>MP motion mot prop 236 drivmedelsreduktion — klimat-principiell avslag.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-yrkanden-19">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-19"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-yrkanden-19">Key yrkanden<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-yrkanden-19"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Avslag på drivmedelsreduktionen.</li>
 <li>Klimatpolitiska ramverket försvaras.</li>
 <li>Istället: utvidgad bidrag till omställningen.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-20">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-20">Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-20"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>DIW</strong>: 7.2 (high)</li>
 <li><strong>Classification</strong>: Fiscal / climate / P0</li>
 <li><strong>Coordination</strong>: 3-party with S <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md">HD024082</a> lead + V <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md">HD024092</a>.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-20">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-20">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-20"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>MP mobiliserar segment D (urban climate) mot Tidö.</li>
 <li>Central klimatnarrativ inför 2026.</li>
@@ -2632,9 +2632,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-20">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex=
 <hr>
 <p><em>Source: <code>get_motioner</code>. Part of highest-salience 3-motion cluster.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>The motion wave of 2026-04-24 lands ~4.5 months before the Swedish parliamentary election of 2026-09-13. This analysis maps motion content to 2026 campaign axes.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion">Electoral landscape pre-motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion">Electoral landscape pre-motion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2696,7 +2696,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-landscape-pre-motion">Electoral landscape pre-motion<a clas
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">2022 result</th><th align="right">Trend (Novus avg Q1 2026)</th><th>Trajectory</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">30.3%</td><td align="right">30–32%</td><td>Stable-up</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">19.1%</td><td align="right">17–19%</td><td>Stable-down</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">20.5%</td><td align="right">21–23%</td><td>Stable-up</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">6.7%</td><td align="right">8–10%</td><td>Up</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">6.7%</td><td align="right">4–5%</td><td>Down (risk under 4% threshold)</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">5.3%</td><td align="right">4–6%</td><td>Stable</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">5.1%</td><td align="right">4–5%</td><td>Stable (threshold risk)</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">4.6%</td><td align="right">3–4%</td><td>Down (threshold risk)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Source: aggregate of publicly reported Novus/Demoskop/Ipsos; April 2026.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave">Campaign axes activated by motion wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave">Campaign axes activated by motion wave<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fiscal / cost-of-living</strong> — drivmedel cluster (prop 236) mobilises rural/commuter vote.</li>
 <li><strong>Migration / rule-of-law</strong> — utvisning cluster (prop 235) mobilises centre-right identity vote + V/MP civil-rights base.</li>
@@ -2705,7 +2705,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-campaign-axes-activated-by-motion-wave">Campaign axes activated by mo
 <li><strong>Civil rights / cyber</strong> — prop 214 creates smaller axis but differentiates MP/C.</li>
 <li><strong>Social policy / protection of vulnerable</strong> — ersättning (prop 222) + konsumkredit (prop 223) mobilise welfare-sensitive voters.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix">Motion-to-vote translation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix">Motion-to-vote translation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-motion-to-vote-translation-matrix">Motion-to-vote translation matrix<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Motion cluster</th><th>Voter segment targeted</th><th>Expected net effect (party)</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Drivmedel</td><td>Rural, commuter</td><td>+0.5 to +1.0% S (fiscal anchor)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a></td></tr><tr><td>Drivmedel</td><td>Young urban climate</td><td>+0.3 to +0.5% MP, V</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning</td><td>Civil-society aligned</td><td>+0.3 to +0.5% V, MP</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning</td><td>Tidö base</td><td>Consolidation, ±0 net</td><td>Tidö bills</td></tr><tr><td>Medicinsk kompetens</td><td>Kommun-vårdsektor</td><td>+0.5 to +1.0% S</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td></tr><tr><td>Krigsmateriel</td><td>Ethical-foreign-policy voters</td><td>+0.2 to +0.4% MP</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td></tr><tr><td>Cybersäk</td><td>Reform-centre voters</td><td>+0.1 to +0.2% C</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-sensitivity">Seat-projection sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-sensitivity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-sensitivity">Seat-projection sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-sensitivity"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2828,14 +2828,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-sensitivity">Seat-projection sensitivity<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario (Sep 2026)</th><th align="right">S</th><th align="right">M</th><th align="right">SD</th><th align="right">V</th><th align="right">C</th><th align="right">KD</th><th align="right">MP</th><th align="right">L</th><th align="right">Tidö total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Base (current polls)</td><td align="right">111</td><td align="right">64</td><td align="right">82</td><td align="right">33</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">11</td><td align="right">175</td></tr><tr><td>Motion-amplified opposition +1% S,V,MP</td><td align="right">115</td><td align="right">62</td><td align="right">80</td><td align="right">36</td><td align="right">14</td><td align="right">17</td><td align="right">16</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">168</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel-price salience +2% S, −1% M</td><td align="right">120</td><td align="right">60</td><td align="right">81</td><td align="right">33</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">14</td><td align="right">8</td><td align="right">167</td></tr><tr><td>Migration salience +1.5% SD, −1% S</td><td align="right">108</td><td align="right">63</td><td align="right">87</td><td align="right">32</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">15</td><td align="right">11</td><td align="right">179</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Seat allocation via Sainte-Laguë method; 349 seats, 4% national threshold.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threshold-risk-parties">Threshold-risk parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-risk-parties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threshold-risk-parties">Threshold-risk parties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-risk-parties"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>C</strong> (4.5%): motion filings (5 motions incl. reform content) aim to differentiate from S — critical survival lever.</li>
 <li><strong>L</strong> (3.8%): zero motions this wave; L relies on Tidö coalition visibility, not parliamentary activism.</li>
 <li><strong>MP</strong> (4.2%): 6 motions create signal but threshold vulnerability remains.</li>
 <li><strong>KD</strong> (5.1%): safely above threshold, no motion activity in wave.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-campaign-narrative-construction">Campaign narrative construction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-narrative-construction"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-campaign-narrative-construction">Campaign narrative construction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-campaign-narrative-construction"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     S[S narrative&#x3C;br/>'Ansvarsfull fiscal politik'] -->|evidence| HD082[HD024082 motion]
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-campaign-narrative-construction">Campaign narrative construction<a cl
     style C fill:#009933,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style M fill:#1f9ed1,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style SD fill:#ffd700,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-electoral-key-dates">Electoral key dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-key-dates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-electoral-key-dates">Electoral key dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-electoral-key-dates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2892,7 +2892,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-electoral-key-dates">Electoral key dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Motion relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-05 to 2026-06</td><td>Utskott hearings</td><td>Motions referenced in debate</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Riksdagen summer recess</td><td>Kammarvoter on Tidö bills 214–236</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07</td><td>Almedalen veckan</td><td>Motion content becomes campaign material</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08</td><td>Formal campaign start</td><td>Motions cited in party manifestos</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Election day</td><td>Motion-mobilised blocs go to polls</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-judgments">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-judgments">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Motion wave amplifies S fiscal-anchor narrative more than any other single event Q2 2026.</li>
 <li>C needs every motion-driven differentiation event to survive 4% threshold; MP in similar position.</li>
@@ -2902,8 +2902,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-judgments">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 <hr>
 <p><em>All percentages are public polling averages. All seat projections are analyst estimates, not predictions.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag seat distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag seat distribution (2022–2026 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2980,7 +2980,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-riksdag-seat-distribution-20222026-mandate">Current Riksdag s
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Seats</th><th align="right">Mandat</th><th>Bloc</th><th align="right">Ja / Nej / Avstår on Tidö bills 214–236 (expected)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">107</td><td align="right">107</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej / Avstår (per motion stance)</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">68</td><td align="right">68</td><td>Tidö</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">73</td><td align="right">73</td><td>Tidö support</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">24</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">24</td><td align="right">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej / Reformamendment</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">19</td><td align="right">19</td><td>Tidö</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">18</td><td align="right">18</td><td>Opposition</td><td align="right">Nej</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">16</td><td align="right">16</td><td>Tidö</td><td align="right">Ja</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td><td align="right"></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill">Tidö vote-math on each bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill">Tidö vote-math on each bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3068,25 +3068,25 @@ <h2 id="rm-tidö-vote-math-on-each-bill">Tidö vote-math on each bill<a class=""
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">Expected Ja</th><th align="center">Expected Nej</th><th align="center">Expected Avstår</th><th align="center">Margin</th><th align="center">Pass?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Prop 214 cyber</td><td align="center">176 (M+SD+KD+L)</td><td align="center">66 (V+MP+C)</td><td align="center">107 (S)</td><td align="center">+2.5×opp</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 215 tidsbeg boende</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">66</td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 216 medicinsk kompetens</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">66</td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes, possible amendment</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 222 ersättning</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP)</td><td align="center">131 (S+C)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 223 konsumkredit</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">48 (V+C)</td><td align="center">125</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 228 krigsmateriel</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP)</td><td align="center">131 (S+C)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 229 mottagandelag</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP+C partial)</td><td align="center">107</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 235 utvisning</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">42 (V+MP)</td><td align="center">107+24 (S+C abstain)</td><td align="center">Yes</td><td align="center">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Prop 236 drivmedel (ändringsbudget)</td><td align="center">176*</td><td align="center">49 (V+MP+C)</td><td align="center">107 (S)</td><td align="center">Yes*</td><td align="center">*Extra procedure risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Extra ändringsbudget route requires Finansutskottet majority + kammarmajoritet; Tidö holds both 176/349.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-coalition-pathways">Opposition coalition pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coalition-pathways"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc">Path A — Classical red-green-centre (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coalition-pathways">Opposition coalition pathways<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coalition-pathways"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc">Path A — Classical red-green-centre (S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-a--classical-red-green-centre-svmpc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 107 + 24 + 18 + 24 = <strong>173/349</strong> → 3 seats short of majority.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility</strong>: Low — requires all 4 opposition parties in lockstep; C-V ideological gap historical barrier.<br>
 <strong>Motion evidence</strong>: Only prop 216 shows 4-party wave; other bills show fragmentation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-path-b--red-red-svmp">Path B — Red-red (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-b--red-red-svmp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-b--red-red-svmp">Path B — Red-red (S+V+MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-b--red-red-svmp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 107 + 24 + 18 = <strong>149/349</strong> → 26 seats short. Non-viable without C.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-path-c--red--centre-sc">Path C — Red + centre (S+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-c--red--centre-sc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-c--red--centre-sc">Path C — Red + centre (S+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-c--red--centre-sc"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 107 + 24 = <strong>131/349</strong> → 44 seats short. Non-viable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160">Path D — Tidö defection scenario (Tidö − L = 160)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160">Path D — Tidö defection scenario (Tidö − L = 160)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-path-d--tidö-defection-scenario-tidö--l--160"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Seats</strong>: 176 − 16 = <strong>160/349</strong> → 14 seats short. If L leaves Tidö, government falls.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility</strong>: Low in 2026 mandate; L polling below threshold disincentivises defection (lose-lose).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-motion-to-vote-mapping">Motion-to-vote mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-motion-to-vote-mapping">Motion-to-vote mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-motion-to-vote-mapping"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Motion filings do not alter seat math</strong>. 20 motions produce floor speeches + betänkande content, not vote changes.</li>
 <li><strong>Motion content can alter public opinion</strong> which influences 2026-09 election, which reshapes post-election coalition math.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected">Post-2026 election scenarios (projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift">Scenario P1 — Tidö continuation (probable if no major shift)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected">Post-2026 election scenarios (projected)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-post-2026-election-scenarios-projected"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift">Scenario P1 — Tidö continuation (probable if no major shift)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3149,7 +3149,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-p1--tidö-continuation-probable-if-no-major-shift">Scenario
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="right">Projected seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S</td><td align="right">111</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td align="right">60</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="right">85</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="right">34</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="right">12–15</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="right">16</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="right">14–16</td><td>Opp</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="right">8–11 (threshold risk)</td><td>Tidö</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>169–172</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition total</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>169–176</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: Near tie; L's threshold survival is decisive. If L drops below 4%, Tidö falls to 161; opposition potentially 179.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc">Scenario P2 — S-led government (requires S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc">Scenario P2 — S-led government (requires S+V+MP+C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -3168,9 +3168,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-scenario-p2--s-led-government-requires-svmpc">Scenario P2 — S-led g
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Need</th><th align="center">Seat requirement</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Red-green-centre majority</td><td align="center">≥ 175</td></tr><tr><td>Feasible only if MP ≥ 5%, C ≥ 5%</td><td align="center">Both near threshold</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm">Scenario P3 — Grand coalition S+M<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm">Scenario P3 — Grand coalition S+M<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-p3--grand-coalition-sm"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Historical precedent</strong>: None in modern era; improbable.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-indicators">Coalition stability indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-stability-indicators">Coalition stability indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-stability-indicators"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     Tidö[Tidö 176/349] -->|prop 214-236| Pass[Bills pass]
@@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-stability-indicators">Coalition stability indicators<a clas
     style Tidö fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Fall fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style RedGreen fill:#e30613,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments-1">Key judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments-1">Key judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Tidö 176/349 is sufficient for every single vote in the 2026-04-24 motion cluster; no opposition coalition can block passage.</li>
 <li>Post-2026 coalition math depends almost entirely on L threshold survival and SD/M relative share; motion content influences this indirectly.</li>
@@ -3195,46 +3195,46 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-judgments-1">Key judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <p><em>Seat counts from <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/ledamoter-partier/">Riksdagen.se</a>. Projected seats are analyst estimates based on reported polling; not predictions.</em></p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Maps motions to Swedish voter segments. Based on publicly available SCB demography, Novus/Demoskop issue-salience surveys, and published electoral-research typologies.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-voter-segments">Primary voter segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-voter-segments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate">Segment A — Rural/Commuter (~18% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-voter-segments">Primary voter segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-voter-segments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate">Segment A — Rural/Commuter (~18% of electorate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-a--ruralcommuter-18-of-electorate"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Geographic rural, high fuel dependency, median age 45–65.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Fuel price, healthcare access, school closures.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Drivmedel cluster (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a>); prop 216 (rural healthcare).<br>
 <strong>2022 vote split</strong>: S 28%, M 20%, SD 25%, KD 7%, C 10%, other 10%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift from motion wave</strong>: +0.5–1.0% S, −0.5% M.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22">Segment B — Urban professional (~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22">Segment B — Urban professional (~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-b--urban-professional-22"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Stockholm/Göteborg/Malmö urban cores, tertiary educated.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Climate, international policy, welfare.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Krigsmateriel (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a>); drivmedel (climate framing MP/V).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 32%, M 22%, V 12%, MP 8%, L 7%, C 5%, SD 8%, KD 2%, other 4%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: +0.3–0.5% V/MP, stable S.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24">Segment C — Suburban middle (~24%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24">Segment C — Suburban middle (~24%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-c--suburban-middle-24"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Medelinkomst, småhus, 30–55 years, kommun vs kommun varierande.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Migration, healthcare queues, trygghet.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Utvisning (prop 235); prop 216 (healthcare).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 26%, M 22%, SD 22%, KD 7%, C 6%, L 5%, V 5%, MP 5%, other 2%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: stable to +0.5% SD on migration salience; +0.3% S on healthcare.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15">Segment D — Young voter (18–29, ~15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15">Segment D — Young voter (18–29, ~15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-d--young-voter-1829-15"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Urban, high education, high climate concern, high migration tolerance.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Climate, housing, civil rights.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Krigsmateriel (MP), drivmedel (climate framing), utvisning (V rights framing).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 20%, M 10%, SD 15%, V 20%, MP 15%, C 8%, KD 4%, L 3%, other 5%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: +0.5–1.0% V, +0.3–0.5% MP.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22">Segment E — Retired pensioners (65+, ~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22">Segment E — Retired pensioners (65+, ~22%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-e--retired-pensioners-65-22"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Pensionsmottagare, geographic mixed, heavy healthcare reliance.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Pension, healthcare, trygghet.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: prop 222 (ersättning); prop 216 (healthcare).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: S 34%, M 20%, SD 20%, KD 10%, C 6%, V 4%, MP 2%, L 2%, other 2%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: +0.3% S, stable SD.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5">Segment F — Civil-society activist (~5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5">Segment F — Civil-society activist (~5%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-f--civil-society-activist-5"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Demographics</strong>: Cross-generation, high political engagement, media-connected.<br>
 <strong>Top issues</strong>: Rättssäkerhet, human rights, environmental policy.<br>
 <strong>Motion relevance</strong>: Utvisning (V/MP framing); vapenexport (MP).<br>
 <strong>2022 split</strong>: V 30%, MP 25%, S 20%, C 10%, L 5%, M 5%, SD 3%, KD 2%.<br>
 <strong>Likely shift</strong>: high mobilisation amplification for V/MP.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix">Segment-motion mobilisation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix">Segment-motion mobilisation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3304,7 +3304,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-segment-motion-mobilisation-matrix">Segment-motion mobilisation matri
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th align="center">Drivmedel</th><th align="center">Utvisning</th><th align="center">Prop 216</th><th align="center">Krigsmateriel</th><th align="center">Ersättning</th><th align="center">Cyber</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>A Rural</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr><tr><td>B Urban prof</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td></tr><tr><td>C Suburban</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr><tr><td>D Young</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td></tr><tr><td>E Pensioners</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td></tr><tr><td>F Civil-society</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Low</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-communication-channel-map">Communication channel map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-communication-channel-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-communication-channel-map">Communication channel map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-communication-channel-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     S[S motion&#x3C;br/>HD024082 fiscal] --> A[Seg A Rural&#x3C;br/>local press, DN]
@@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-communication-channel-map">Communication channel map<a class="" aria-
     style V fill:#a31621,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style MP fill:#83c67a,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style C_motion fill:#009933,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy">Implications for campaign strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy">Implications for campaign strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>S</strong> should frame drivmedel motion for A+E (rural + pensioner) — combined 40% of electorate.</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong> should frame utvisning motion for D+F (young + civil-society) — combined 20% but high-activism multiplier.</li>
@@ -3329,28 +3329,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-implications-for-campaign-strategy">Implications for campaign strateg
 <hr>
 <p><em>Voter segment sizes are published SCB demographic approximations. Issue salience is reported Novus/Demoskop data. No individual voter targeting — aggregate segments only.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Comparator jurisdictions for the Swedish motion wave. Three comparators: <strong>Denmark</strong>, <strong>Germany</strong>, <strong>United Kingdom</strong>. Purpose: triangulate how equivalent opposition behaviour plays out under different parliamentary systems.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparators">Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparators"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture">1. Denmark — Folketing motion culture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-comparators">Comparators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparators"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture">1. Denmark — Folketing motion culture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-denmark--folketing-motion-culture"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>System</strong>: Unicameral, minority governments norm, "parliamentarism".
 <strong>Relevant pattern</strong>: Opposition files "beslutningsforslag" (B) motions prolifically — norm rather than signal.
 <strong>Analogue to SWE 2026-04-24</strong>: Danish opposition similarly fragmented S/SF/EL on fiscal questions; government routinely negotiates per-bill deals ("forligspolitik") unavailable in Swedish Tidö context.
 <strong>Difference</strong>: Denmark's tradition of broad cross-bloc "forlig" dampens motion-wave impact; Sweden's Tidö agreement locks support pre-vote, reducing motion leverage.
 <strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://www.ft.dk/">ft.dk</a>, Danish research "Forhandlingspolitik og fragmenterede majoriteter" (Christiansen, Pedersen).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions">2. Germany — Bundestag opposition motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions">2. Germany — Bundestag opposition motions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-germany--bundestag-opposition-motions"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>System</strong>: Federal bicameral, coalition government norm, constitutional review.
 <strong>Relevant pattern</strong>: SPD/Grüne/FDP Ampel (2021-2024) faced CDU/CSU + AfD + Linke opposition; opposition "Anträge" often parallel, rarely co-signed across bloc.
 <strong>Analogue</strong>: German opposition fragmentation on Heizungsgesetz (2023) mirrors Swedish fragmentation on drivmedel 2026 — three opposition parties, three parallel tracks.
 <strong>Difference</strong>: Bundesrat (Länder chamber) adds veto point absent in Swedish system; Swedish Regering faces only Riksdag floor.
 <strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://www.bundestag.de/">bundestag.de</a>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition">3. United Kingdom — Commons opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition">3. United Kingdom — Commons opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-united-kingdom--commons-opposition"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>System</strong>: Westminster unitary, single-party majorities common.
 <strong>Relevant pattern</strong>: HoC opposition amendments on government bills; Labour 2019–2024 in opposition filed reasoned amendments on Conservative migration legislation (Illegal Migration Act 2023, Rwanda Act 2024).
 <strong>Analogue</strong>: Labour reasoned amendments on Rwanda scheme structurally similar to V/MP avslag on Swedish <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a>.
 <strong>Difference</strong>: First-past-the-post produces single-axis opposition; PR produces multi-axis (fiscal/defence/migration) as seen 2026-04-24.
 <strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://www.parliament.uk/">parliament.uk</a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-matrix">Comparative matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-matrix">Comparative matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3406,16 +3406,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-matrix">Comparative matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Sweden 2026-04-24</th><th>Denmark</th><th>Germany</th><th>UK</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Parliamentary system</td><td>Unicameral, Tidö + support</td><td>Unicameral, minority norm</td><td>Federal bicameral</td><td>Westminster majority</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition fragmentation</td><td>4 parties S/V/MP/C</td><td>4-5 parties (S/SF/EL/RV)</td><td>3 parties (CDU/AfD/Linke)</td><td>1 dominant (Labour)</td></tr><tr><td>Counter-motion density</td><td>2.2 motions/bill</td><td>~3 motions/bill (B-forslag)</td><td>~2 Anträge/bill</td><td>1 reasoned amendment norm</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition discipline</td><td>Tidö 176/349 locked</td><td>Broad forlig norm</td><td>Ampel internal strain</td><td>Single-party discipline</td></tr><tr><td>Ethical vapenexport precedent</td><td>MP HD024096</td><td>2015 Bahrain debate</td><td>Saudi arms freeze 2018</td><td>Rwanda scheme 2023</td></tr><tr><td>Migration opposition framing</td><td>Rättssäkerhet (V/MP)</td><td>Folkeoplysning (EL)</td><td>Verfassungsmäßigkeit (Linke)</td><td>Human rights (Labour)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-key-insight">Key insight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-insight">Key insight<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-insight"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>PR + formal coalition agreement is unusually rigid</strong>. The comparator jurisdictions show that opposition motion waves in minority/coalition systems typically produce either forlig (Denmark) or per-bill coalition flexibility (Germany Ampel). Tidö's formal written agreement + SD's coalition discipline produces less flexibility than comparable regimes — which means 2026-04-24 motions likely have <strong>less</strong> impact than opposition-motion density would predict.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-21">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-21"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-21">Implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-21"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Swedish opposition cannot replicate Danish forligspolitik because Tidö-avtal precludes bilateral bill-by-bill deals.</li>
 <li>German Bundesrat-style veto point absent — no fallback forum for opposition.</li>
 <li>UK-style single-bill reasoned amendments more impactful per unit effort than Swedish multi-axis motions.</li>
 <li>Election-cycle effect (SE 2026) more determinative of motion impact than parliamentary math.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition">Cross-national lessons for Swedish opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition">Cross-national lessons for Swedish opposition<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>S</strong> (take Denmark's book): Build durable fiscal-anchor narrative that survives one election cycle; don't expect per-motion wins.</li>
 <li><strong>V</strong> (take Germany's book): Build extra-parliamentary pressure (civil society + media) to amplify motions.</li>
@@ -3425,40 +3425,40 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-national-lessons-for-swedish-opposition">Cross-national lessons
 <hr>
 <p><em>Comparator data sourced from public parliamentary archives. No classified or private sources.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Locates the 2026-04-24 motion wave within Swedish parliamentary history. Identifies five relevant parallels.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen">Parallel 1 — 2014 spring motion wave vs. Alliansregeringen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen">Parallel 1 — 2014 spring motion wave vs. Alliansregeringen<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-spring-motion-wave-vs-alliansregeringen"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: March–May 2014.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Alliansregeringen (M+FP+C+KD) minority government with Tidö-analogous support from opposition Ds on migration.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Opposition S+V+MP filed parallel motions across fiscal/welfare package pre-autumn 2014 election.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: Government lost 2014-09 election despite passing most bills intact.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Bill passage ≠ electoral success; motion content shapes campaign.<br>
 <strong>Source</strong>: Riksdagen archives, <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate">Parallel 2 — 2018 fuel price / drivmedel politisk debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate">Parallel 2 — 2018 fuel price / drivmedel politisk debate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2018-fuel-price--drivmedel-politisk-debate"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2018 pre-election.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: SD mobilised around drivmedel prices against Löfven-S regering.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Drivmedel (prop 236) / <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> / <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a> is ideologically inverted 2018 pattern.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: SD grew from 12.9% (2014) to 17.5% (2018) on rural fiscal grievance.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Drivmedel is recurring Swedish politicum with measurable electoral traction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift">Parallel 3 — 2015–2016 utvisning / asylum policy shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift">Parallel 3 — 2015–2016 utvisning / asylum policy shift<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--20152016-utvisning--asylum-policy-shift"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: Autumn 2015 → spring 2016.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Löfven-S/MP regering shifted migration policy from "our hearts are wide open" to tougher controls.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Prop 235 / <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a> continues Tidö hardening trajectory; V/MP opposition echoes 2016 dynamics.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: S lost migration-liberal voters to V; gained some centre voters; net near zero.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Migration hardening produces realignment without net shift; V gains at S expense.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application">Parallel 4 — 2022 krigsmateriel / vapenexport debate (pre-Nato application)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application">Parallel 4 — 2022 krigsmateriel / vapenexport debate (pre-Nato application)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-4--2022-krigsmateriel--vapenexport-debate-pre-nato-application"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: March–May 2022.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Post-invasion of Ukraine; Sweden's Nato application; MP split from S.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: MP motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a> extends 2022 ethical-export axis.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: Swedish Nato accession 2024; MP's ethical critique absorbed into mainstream through qualified support.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: MP's ethical-defence framework has durability but limited single-election traction.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering">Parallel 5 — 1994 spring motion wave vs. Bildt regering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering">Parallel 5 — 1994 spring motion wave vs. Bildt regering<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-5--1994-spring-motion-wave-vs-bildt-regering"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: March–June 1994.<br>
 <strong>Context</strong>: Bildt (M) borgerlig minority government with Ny Demokrati support.<br>
 <strong>Parallel</strong>: Structurally similar to Tidö — borgerlig block + unconventional support party (ND then, SD now); opposition wave included fiscal critique.<br>
 <strong>Outcome</strong>: Carlsson (S) won 1994 election; Bildt out; ND vanished.<br>
 <strong>Lesson</strong>: Dependence on non-traditional support parties creates narrative fragility; motion wave amplifies this.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-motion-density-baselines">Historical motion-density baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-motion-density-baselines"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-motion-density-baselines">Historical motion-density baselines<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-motion-density-baselines"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3526,7 +3526,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-historical-motion-density-baselines">Historical motion-density baseli
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">Year</th><th>Post-proposition-package window</th><th align="right">Motions filed</th><th>Opposition parties</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">2014</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~25</td><td>S+V+MP+C</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2018</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~30</td><td>SD+MP+V</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2019</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~18</td><td>M+C+KD+L+V</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2020</td><td>Spring (pandemic)</td><td align="right">~12</td><td>M+V</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2021</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~22</td><td>M+SD+V+KD</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2022</td><td>Spring pre-election</td><td align="right">~35</td><td>M+SD+V+KD+L</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2024</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~15</td><td>S+V+MP+C</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2025</td><td>Spring</td><td align="right">~20</td><td>S+V+MP+C</td></tr><tr><td align="right"><strong>2026 (this wave)</strong></td><td>Spring pre-election</td><td align="right"><strong>20 in 3 days</strong></td><td><strong>S+V+MP+C</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Context</strong>: 2026-04-24 wave is within normal range but compressed into 3 days — pattern consistent with coordinated pre-election positioning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-table"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3575,7 +3575,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparative-table">Comparative table<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parallel</th><th>Regering</th><th align="center">Tidö-analogue?</th><th align="center">Election impact</th><th align="center">Motion wave size</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1994 Bildt</td><td>M+FP+C+KD+ND</td><td align="center">Yes (ND)</td><td align="center">Regering fell</td><td align="center">Large</td></tr><tr><td>2014 Reinfeldt</td><td>M+FP+C+KD</td><td align="center">Partial</td><td align="center">Regering fell</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>2018 Löfven I</td><td>S+MP / C+L neutrality</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center">Minor coalition loss</td><td align="center">Medium</td></tr><tr><td>2022 Andersson</td><td>S</td><td align="center">No</td><td align="center">Regering fell</td><td align="center">Large</td></tr><tr><td><strong>2026 Kristersson</strong></td><td><strong>M+KD+L+SD support</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Yes</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>TBD 2026-09-13</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>Medium</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-timeline">Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-timeline">Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 timeline
     title Swedish opposition motion waves vs regering outcomes
@@ -3584,7 +3584,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-timeline">Timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
     2018 : Löfven I loses voter support despite passing bills
     2022 : Andersson regering falls after motion wave + election
     2026 : Kristersson regering — TBD</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern">Judgments from historical pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern">Judgments from historical pattern<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Every spring motion wave before a Swedish election since 1994 has preceded a regering change.</li>
 <li>This is <strong>not a universal rule</strong> — but baseline probability of regering change in 2026-09 is ≥ 50% per pattern-base rate.</li>
@@ -3595,67 +3595,67 @@ <h2 id="rm-judgments-from-historical-pattern">Judgments from historical pattern<
 <hr>
 <p><em>Historical data from <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">Riksdagen.se</a> archives and <a href="https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/demokrati/allmanna-val/">SCB election tables</a>. No forecasting claim; pattern base-rate only.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Assesses the implementation feasibility of the 9 Tidö bills <strong>if passed</strong>, independent of political outcome. Focus: administrative, fiscal, legal, and temporal realism.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-bill-feasibility">Per-bill feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-bill-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform">Prop 214 — Cybersäkerhet reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-per-bill-feasibility">Per-bill feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-bill-feasibility"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform">Prop 214 — Cybersäkerhet reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-214--cybersäkerhet-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Requires MSB capacity expansion; coordination with PTS (Post- och telestyrelsen).<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: ~500 MSEK/year ramp-up; within budget feasibility.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Compatible with NIS2 directive; implementation 12–18 months.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Skill shortage in cybersäkerhet; recruitment timeline.<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: C motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a> flags implementation risk.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Medium</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende">Prop 215 — Tidsbegränsat boende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende">Prop 215 — Tidsbegränsat boende<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-215--tidsbegränsat-boende"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Migrationsverket + kommunal samordning.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Neutral to slight saving.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: ECHR Art. 8 (family life) compatibility concerns flagged by C <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a>.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Legal challenge risk; Migrationsdomstol caseload.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Low-Medium</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform">Prop 216 — Medicinsk kompetens reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform">Prop 216 — Medicinsk kompetens reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-216--medicinsk-kompetens-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Major — SKR kommunsektor engagement required; legitimationsprocess ändras.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Kommunsektor-kostnad unclear; 4-party motion wave flags finansiering.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: EU-direktiv (2005/36/EC) compatibility must be verified.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Workforce pipeline depends on Socialstyrelsens kapacitet.<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: All 4 opposition parties flag implementation concerns.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Low</strong> — highest implementation risk in wave.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler">Prop 222 — Ersättningsregler<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler">Prop 222 — Ersättningsregler<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-222--ersättningsregler"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Försäkringskassan IT-system update; moderate.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Neutral.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Väl avgränsat; minimal risk.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: IT-modernisering timeline.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Medium-High</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit">Prop 223 — Konsumentkredit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit">Prop 223 — Konsumentkredit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-223--konsumentkredit"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Finansinspektionen + Konsumentverket tillsyn.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Neutral.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Kompatibel med EU-direktiv 2008/48/EC som uppdaterat 2023/2225.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Kreditgivare-anpassning 6–12 mån.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>High</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel">Prop 228 — Krigsmateriel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel">Prop 228 — Krigsmateriel<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-228--krigsmateriel"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: ISP (Inspektionen för strategiska produkter) capacity.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: ISP-budget ~50 MSEK/år sufficient.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Kompatibel med EU-gemensam ståndpunkt 2008/944/CFSP.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: MP-motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a> framework would add review burden.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>High</strong> as drafted; <strong>Medium</strong> if MP framework adopted.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-229--mottagandelag">Prop 229 — Mottagandelag<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-229--mottagandelag"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-229--mottagandelag">Prop 229 — Mottagandelag<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-229--mottagandelag"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Migrationsverket + kommunal mottagandekapacitet.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Kommunal ersättningssystem ändringar; ~800 MSEK omfördelning.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: Dublin III / CEAS compatibility.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Kommunal opposition; C motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a> flags kommun ersättning.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Medium-Low</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-235--utvisning">Prop 235 — Utvisning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-235--utvisning"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-235--utvisning">Prop 235 — Utvisning<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-235--utvisning"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Migrationsverket + Migrationsdomstolar + Polisen.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: Migrationsverket + Polisen kapacitet ~1.5 mdkr ramp.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: ECHR Art. 3 + 8 + EU return directive (2008/115/EC) compliance non-trivial.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Domstolarnas kapacitet; ECHR rechtspraxis risk.<br>
 <strong>Evidence</strong>: V/MP motions flag rättssäkerhet concerns.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>Low-Medium</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget">Prop 236 — Drivmedel (ändringsbudget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget">Prop 236 — Drivmedel (ändringsbudget)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prop-236--drivmedel-ändringsbudget"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Administrative</strong>: Skatteverket systemändring enkel; ~3 månader.<br>
 <strong>Fiscal</strong>: ~2.5 mdkr statsbudgetkostnad; S motion <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a> begär finansiering.<br>
 <strong>Legal</strong>: EU energiskattedirektiv (2003/96/EC) golvnivå måste hållas.<br>
 <strong>Blockers</strong>: Extra ändringsbudget procedur — FiU majoritetsmust hållas.<br>
 <strong>Feasibility score</strong>: <strong>High administrativt</strong>; <strong>Medium politiskt</strong> (extra procedur).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-feasibility-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3742,7 +3742,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-feasibility-matrix">Feasibility matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">Admin</th><th align="center">Fiscal</th><th align="center">Legal</th><th align="center">Temporal</th><th align="center">Overall</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>214 cyber</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>215 tidsbeg</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Low-Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>216 med komp</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>Low</strong></td></tr><tr><td>222 ersättn</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Medium-High</strong></td></tr><tr><td>223 konskred</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td></tr><tr><td>228 krigsmat</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td></tr><tr><td>229 mottag</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center"><strong>Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>235 utvisning</td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center">Low</td><td align="center"><strong>Low-Medium</strong></td></tr><tr><td>236 drivmedel</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">High</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong> procedural risk</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-bill-dependencies">Cross-bill dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-bill-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-bill-dependencies">Cross-bill dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-bill-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     216[Prop 216 med komp] -->|workforce| 235[Prop 235 utvisning]
@@ -3757,7 +3757,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-bill-dependencies">Cross-bill dependencies<a class="" aria-hidd
     style 229 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style 235 fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style 236 fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-judgments-1">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-judgments-1">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-judgments-1"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Prop 216</strong> is the highest implementation-risk bill; motion wave correctly identifies weakest link.</li>
 <li><strong>Prop 235 + 229</strong> combined create kommunal kapacitet stress.</li>
@@ -3765,7 +3765,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-judgments-1">Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 <li><strong>Prop 214 + 223 + 228</strong> är relativt oproblematiska administrativt.</li>
 <li>Opposition-motioner fokuserar — korrekt — på de bilar med reell implementationsrisk (216, 229, 235, 236).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-timeline">Implementation timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-timeline"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-timeline">Implementation timeline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-timeline"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 gantt
     title Implementation timeline if all bills pass 2026-06
@@ -3785,10 +3785,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-implementation-timeline">Implementation timeline<a class="" aria-hidd
 <hr>
 <p><em>Implementation feasibility is independent of political feasibility. Sources: <a href="https://www.regeringen.se/">regeringen.se</a>, <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a>, <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/">ec.europa.eu</a> for EU directive references.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Structured challenge to the lead synthesis. Presents competing hypotheses (ACH — Analysis of Competing Hypotheses). Purpose: ensure the dominant narrative is not adopted by default.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-ledger">Hypothesis ledger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-ledger"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims">H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-ledger">Hypothesis ledger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-ledger"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims">H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthesis claims)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The 20-motion wave reveals coordinated opposition resistance to Tidö's legislative package; SD silence amplifies Tidö discipline; motions shape 2026 election cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3803,7 +3803,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h1--lead-hypothesis-synthesis-claims">H1 — Lead hypothesis (synthes
 <li>Motion filing != voter salience</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Moderate (Admiralty B3)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis">H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis">H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: This motion wave is routine parliamentary procedure; the 20-motion count is statistically within normal post-proposition activity and has no predictive value for 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3818,7 +3818,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h2--baseline--null-hypothesis">H2 — Baseline / null hypothesis<a cl
 <li>Timing 4 months pre-election amplifies salience</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Moderate (Admiralty B3)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party">H3 — Contrarian hypothesis (Tidö is the vulnerable party)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party">H3 — Contrarian hypothesis (Tidö is the vulnerable party)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The real political story is not opposition coordination but Tidö fragility — the need for 9 bills in a single wave is itself a signal of rushed implementation pre-election, and SD silence is preparation to claim credit if bills pass or to break away if they fail.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3833,7 +3833,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h3--contrarian-hypothesis-tidö-is-the-vulnerable-party">H3 — Contr
 <li>Extra ändringsbudget is not unprecedented</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Low-Moderate (C3)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis">H4 — Economic-determinist hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis">H4 — Economic-determinist hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: Fuel-price politics (prop 236 / HD024082 / HD024092 / HD024098) dominates everything; migration/defence/welfare motions are noise around the real axis of rural-urban fiscal conflict, already mediated by SCB KPI data and ECB rate cycle.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -3848,7 +3848,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-h4--economic-determinist-hypothesis">H4 — Economic-determinist hypo
 <li>MP framing explicitly multi-axis</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: Low (C4)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring">ACH matrix (consistency scoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring">ACH matrix (consistency scoring)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3926,13 +3926,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix-consistency-scoring">ACH matrix (consistency scoring)<a cl
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">H1</th><th align="center">H2</th><th align="center">H3</th><th align="center">H4</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>20 motions in 3 days</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Zero SD counter-motions</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Four-party wave on prop 216</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">−</td></tr><tr><td>MP ethical vapenexport framework</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">−</td></tr><tr><td>Extra ändringsbudget route</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>SD polling advantage</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>SCB fuel inflation</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Election-cycle timing</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Historical 15–30 motion baseline</td><td align="center">−</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: + = consistent, − = inconsistent, 0 = neutral. H1 is best-supported but not decisively. H2 is plausible null; analyst should not over-claim.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-uncertainties">Key uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-uncertainties">Key uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-uncertainties"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Is 20 motions statistically above baseline? (Answer requires multi-year motion-density dataset — flagged for ingest in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a>.)</li>
 <li>Will SD break silence if any Tidö bill fails? (Watch: public statements next 30 days.)</li>
 <li>Will SKR formally object to prop 216? (Direct validator for H1 vs H2.)</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-recommendations">Red-team recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-recommendations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-recommendations">Red-team recommendations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-recommendations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Add</strong>: motion-density baseline from Riksdagen archives 2018–2025 before next run.</li>
 <li><strong>Add</strong>: SCB public-opinion data on drivmedel and migration salience.</li>
@@ -3942,9 +3942,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-red-team-recommendations">Red-team recommendations<a class="" aria-hi
 <hr>
 <p><em>Structured challenge does not reject the lead synthesis but recommends hedging on confidence where evidence is thin. All dok_id citations are verifiable at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a>.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Seven-dimension classification per document. Dimensions: <strong>Policy Area</strong>, <strong>Process Stage</strong>, <strong>Partisan Axis</strong>, <strong>Electoral Salience</strong>, <strong>Legal Intensity</strong>, <strong>Fiscal Impact</strong>, <strong>Distributional Effect</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4224,7 +4224,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-classification">Per-document classification<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Policy Area</th><th>Stage</th><th>Partisan Axis</th><th>Elect Salience</th><th>Legal</th><th>Fiscal</th><th>Distributional</th><th>Priority</th><th>Retention</th><th>Access</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024082.html">HD024082</a></td><td>Fiscal/energy</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left-bloc vs Tidö</td><td>Very High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>High</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P0</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">HD024098</a></td><td>Fiscal/climate</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024092.html">HD024092</a></td><td>Fiscal/distributional</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Highly progressive</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024096.html">HD024096</a></td><td>Foreign/defence</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö+S</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024090.html">HD024090</a></td><td>Migration/justice</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>High</td><td>Very High</td><td>Low</td><td>Redistributive</td><td><strong>P1</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024097.html">HD024097</a></td><td>Migration/justice</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Redistributive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024095.html">HD024095</a></td><td>Migration/justice</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024089.html">HD024089</a></td><td>Migration/welfare</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024087.html">HD024087</a></td><td>Migration/welfare</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024091.html">HD024091</a></td><td>Foreign/defence</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024081.html">HD024081</a></td><td>Welfare/health</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>S vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Progressive</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024083.html">HD024083</a></td><td>Welfare/health</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Progressive</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024094.html">HD024094</a></td><td>Welfare/health</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024078.html">HD024078</a></td><td>Civil law</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>S vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024085.html">HD024085</a></td><td>Civil law</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024084.html">HD024084</a></td><td>Civil law</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Left vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024079.html">HD024079</a></td><td>Migration/labour</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>S vs Tidö</td><td>Medium</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P2</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024086.html">HD024086</a></td><td>Migration/labour</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Green vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Mixed</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024093.html">HD024093</a></td><td>Defence/cyber</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Low</td><td>Neutral</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024088.html">HD024088</a></td><td>Consumer finance</td><td>Counter-motion</td><td>Centre vs Tidö</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Progressive</td><td><strong>P3</strong></td><td>Permanent</td><td>Public</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-distribution">Priority tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-distribution">Priority tier distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4261,9 +4261,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tier-distribution">Priority tier distribution<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Tier</th><th align="right">Count</th><th align="right">Share</th><th>Response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>P0 (critical)</td><td align="right">1</td><td align="right">5%</td><td>Lead article, detailed stakeholder map</td></tr><tr><td>P1 (high)</td><td align="right">4</td><td align="right">20%</td><td>Secondary articles, dedicated section</td></tr><tr><td>P2 (medium)</td><td align="right">9</td><td align="right">45%</td><td>Cluster analysis</td></tr><tr><td>P3 (routine)</td><td align="right">6</td><td align="right">30%</td><td>Briefly noted in table</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 <p>All 20 documents are <strong>Offentliga handlingar</strong> (public documents) under Offentlighetsprincipen. Retention: permanent (Riksdagsdata long-term archive). Access control: none required. GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) — data manifestly made public by data subjects (MPs acting in official capacity). No special-category masking required.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map">Mermaid — classification heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map">Mermaid — classification heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     subgraph Fiscal [Fiscal — 3 motions]
@@ -4307,9 +4307,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--classification-heat-map">Mermaid — classification heat map
 <hr>
 <p><em>Classification cross-validated against significance-scoring.md DIW tiers (L3 ↔ P0, L2+ ↔ P1, L2 ↔ P2, L1 ↔ P3).</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Maps policy clusters, legislative chains, opposition coordination patterns across 20 motions.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-graph">Policy cluster graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-graph"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-cluster-graph">Policy cluster graph<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-graph"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart TB
     subgraph Fiscal[Fiscal / Economy — FiU]
@@ -4349,7 +4349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-graph">Policy cluster graph<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style Migration fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Welfare fill:#8338ec,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style Civil fill:#3a86ff,stroke:#fff,color:#fff</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chain">Legislative chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chain">Legislative chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chain"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme':'dark'}}%%
 flowchart LR
     GovProp[Regering props&#x3C;br/>214-236] --> Filed[Filed&#x3C;br/>riksdag.se]
@@ -4364,7 +4364,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chain">Legislative chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style GovProp fill:#00d9ff,stroke:#000,color:#000
     style Kammarvote fill:#ff006e,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
     style Law fill:#ffbe0b,stroke:#000,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-coordination-matrix">Opposition coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-coordination-matrix">Opposition coordination matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-coordination-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4451,19 +4451,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-opposition-coordination-matrix">Opposition coordination matrix<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Cluster</th><th align="center">S</th><th align="center">V</th><th align="center">MP</th><th align="center">C</th><th>Coordination pattern</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Drivmedel (236)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Three-party parallel (no co-sign)</td></tr><tr><td>Krigsmateriel (228)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Three-party parallel, divergent content</td></tr><tr><td>Utvisning (235)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Three-party parallel, converging on rättssäkerhet</td></tr><tr><td>Medicinsk kompetens (216)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td><strong>Four-party wave</strong> — strongest coordination</td></tr><tr><td>Mottagandelag (229)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Single-party (C)</td></tr><tr><td>Tidsbeg boende (215)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Single-party (C)</td></tr><tr><td>Ersättning (222)</td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td>Two-party</td></tr><tr><td>Konsumentkredit (223)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Two-party</td></tr><tr><td>Cybersäk (214)</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center">✓</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Two-party</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-issue-linkage-network">Issue-linkage network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-linkage-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-issue-linkage-network">Issue-linkage network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-issue-linkage-network"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Drivmedel ↔ migration</strong>: V explicitly frames both as distributional questions (HD024092 + HD024090). Rhetorical thread: "who pays".</li>
 <li><strong>Krigsmateriel ↔ cyber</strong>: MP links defence-industry scrutiny to civil cyber resilience (HD024096 + HD024085).</li>
 <li><strong>Medicinsk kompetens ↔ mottagandelag</strong>: C links healthcare workforce to migration system capacity (HD024094 + HD024089).</li>
 <li><strong>Utvisning ↔ tidsbeg boende</strong>: Both migration-regime bills; C on one, V/MP/S on the other — divergent issue selection among opposition.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref">Historical precedents (same-day cross-ref)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref">Historical precedents (same-day cross-ref)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-precedents-same-day-cross-ref"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>2026-04-23 motions cluster (see <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/"><code>../2026-04-23/motions/</code></a>) — previous day's motion wave preceded this one; check continuity.</li>
 <li>2026-04-18 propositions cluster — originating Tidö legislative package.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-external-links">External links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-links"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-external-links">External links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-external-links"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Riksdagen open data: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/">data.riksdagen.se</a></li>
 <li>All dok_ids resolvable at <code>https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html</code></li>
@@ -4472,8 +4472,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-external-links">External links<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <hr>
 <p><em>Cross-reference map generated from 20 motion manifest. Verifiable via <code>search_dokument</code> on any dok_id.</em></p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
 <p>Checklist against the ICD 203 nine standards:</p>
 
 
@@ -4541,7 +4541,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>Standard</th><th align="center">Applied?</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>Objectivity</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Neutral language; every party treated symmetrically in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md">swot-analysis.md</a></td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>Independence from political advocacy</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>No recommendations favour any party; judgments are descriptive</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>Timeliness</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>2026-04-24 analysis of 2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17 motion wave</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>Based on available sources</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>All claims cite dok_id or primary URL</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>Proper standard of analytic tradecraft</td><td align="center">Partial</td><td>SATs used: ACH (<a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a>), SWOT, scenario analysis; attested below</td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>Properly describes quality of source</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Admiralty codes applied in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md">intelligence-assessment.md</a> (B2, B3, C3, C4)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>Expresses uncertainties</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Confidence labels on every KJ; probabilities sum to 100% in scenarios</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>Distinguishes intelligence from assumptions</td><td align="center">✓</td><td>Key assumptions flagged (e.g. baseline motion density unknown)</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>Incorporates alternative analysis</td><td align="center">✓</td><td><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a> H2/H3/H4 considered</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation">Structured analytic techniques (SAT) attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation">Structured analytic techniques (SAT) attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>At least 10 SATs applied to this run:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</strong> — <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md">devils-advocate.md</a></li>
@@ -4557,7 +4557,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-analytic-techniques-sat-attestation">Structured analytic t
 <li><strong>Bayesian posterior estimation</strong> — <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md">risk-assessment.md</a></li>
 <li><strong>Decision-tree modelling</strong> — <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md">scenario-analysis.md</a></li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled">Admiralty Code source rating (WEP / Kent Scale reconciled)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled">Admiralty Code source rating (WEP / Kent Scale reconciled)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4613,7 +4613,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-admiralty-code-source-rating-wep--kent-scale-reconciled">Admiralty Co
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Source</th><th align="center">Reliability</th><th align="center">Credibility</th><th align="center">Combined</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Riksdagen open data (dok_id)</td><td align="center">A</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">A1</td><td>Completely reliable, confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>Regeringen.se propositions</td><td align="center">A</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">A1</td><td>Primary source</td></tr><tr><td>SCB statistics</td><td align="center">A</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">A2</td><td>Official statistics</td></tr><tr><td>MCP riksdag-regering</td><td align="center">B</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">B2</td><td>Usually reliable proxy for A1 sources</td></tr><tr><td>Historical parliamentary archives (inferred baselines)</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">C3</td><td>Fairly reliable, possibly true</td></tr><tr><td>Expert commentary (not used as primary evidence)</td><td align="center">C</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">C4</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality--gaps">Data quality &#x26; gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality--gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality--gaps">Data quality &#x26; gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality--gaps"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Present</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>20 verified dok_ids, full metadata per <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md">data-download-manifest.md</a></li>
@@ -4629,7 +4629,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-quality--gaps">Data quality &#x26; gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="
 <li><strong>Cross-border comparators</strong> — Danish/German/UK equivalents described but not quantified on motion-density metric.</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-motions
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24866827737
 <strong>UTC timestamp</strong>: 2026-04-24T01:05Z
@@ -4639,7 +4639,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Lookback used</strong>: The current riksmöte 2025/26 motion window for counter-motions to government propositions peaked 2026-04-15 to 2026-04-17 (motion deadline following prop tabling). 2026-04-24 is a procedural day; the most recent 20 motions below form today's analytical corpus per §3 lookback policy.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions">Per-document inventory (20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions">Per-document inventory (20 motions)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4856,15 +4856,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-document-inventory-20-motions">Per-document inventory (20 motions
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="right">#</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Datum</th><th>Organ</th><th>Party</th><th>Responds to</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Full text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="right">1</td><td>HD024098</td><td>2026-04-17</td><td>FiU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – drivmedel/el/gas</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">2</td><td>HD024096</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:228</td><td>Regelverk för krigsmateriel</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">3</td><td>HD024094</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SoU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:216</td><td>Medicinsk kompetens kommunal hälso- och sjukvård</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">4</td><td>HD024092</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>FiU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026 – drivmedel</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">5</td><td>HD024091</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>UU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:228</td><td>Krigsmateriel — vapenexport</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">6</td><td>HD024097</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:235</td><td>Skärpta regler om utvisning p.g.a. brott</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">7</td><td>HD024095</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:235</td><td>Utvisning p.g.a. brott — systematik</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">8</td><td>HD024093</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>FöU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:214</td><td>Nationellt cybersäkerhetscenter</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">9</td><td>HD024090</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>SfU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:235</td><td>Utvisning p.g.a. brott — avslag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">10</td><td>HD024088</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:223</td><td>Ny konsumentkreditlag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">11</td><td>HD024086</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:215</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende nyanlända</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">12</td><td>HD024085</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:222</td><td>Ersättningsregler med brottsoffret i fokus</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">13</td><td>HD024084</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:222</td><td>Ersättningsregler — vårdnadshavares ansvar</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">14</td><td>HD024083</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SoU</td><td>V</td><td>prop 2025/26:216</td><td>Medicinsk kompetens — avslag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">15</td><td>HD024082</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>FiU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget 2026</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">16</td><td>HD024081</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SoU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:216</td><td>Medicinsk kompetens — S-linje</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">17</td><td>HD024079</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>AU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:215</td><td>Tidsbegränsat boende — S-linje</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">18</td><td>HD024078</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>CU</td><td>S</td><td>prop 2025/26:222</td><td>Ersättningsregler — brottsofferlag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">19</td><td>HD024089</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>C</td><td>prop 2025/26:229</td><td>En ny mottagandelag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr><tr><td align="right">20</td><td>HD024087</td><td>2026-04-15</td><td>SfU</td><td>MP</td><td>prop 2025/26:229</td><td>En ny mottagandelag — avslag</td><td>metadata-only</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-source-urls-primary">Source URLs (primary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-urls-primary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-urls-primary">Source URLs (primary)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-urls-primary"></a></h3>
 <p>All accessible at <code>https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html</code>. Example: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html">https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD024098.html</a>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-server-availability-notes">MCP server availability notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-server-availability-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_sync_status</code>: live (2026-04-24T01:05:50Z)</li>
 <li><code>get_motioner</code>: successful on first call, 20 records retrieved</li>
 <li>No retries required. No partial failures.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-summary">Cluster summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-summary">Cluster summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -4934,6 +4934,53 @@ <h2 id="rm-cluster-summary">Cluster summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
 <p><strong>Opposition coverage</strong>: S (5), V (4), MP (6), C (5). Sverigedemokraterna (SD) absent from counter-motion wave — a structurally notable signal given SD's Tidö-coalition alignment.</p>
 <hr>
 <p><em>Author: James Pether Sörling · Generated via riksdag-regering MCP</em></p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024078-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024078-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024079-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024079-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024080-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024080-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024081-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024081-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024082-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024082-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024083-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024083-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024084-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024084-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024085-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024085-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024086-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024086-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024087-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024087-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024088-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024088-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024089-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024089-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024090-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024090-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024091-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024091-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024092-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024092-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024093-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024093-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024094-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024094-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024095-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024095-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024096-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024096-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024097-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024097-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/documents/HD024098-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD024098-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -4999,7 +5046,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:12.542Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:34.121Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html b/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html
index 353aab605c..d9d7ff20c5 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Propositions ( batch)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.812Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.385Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.812Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.385Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Propositions ( batch)","description":"On 23 April 2026 the Kristersson government (Tidö coalition — M, KD, L + SD confidence partner) tabled 4 parliamentary documents dominated by two strategic priorities: (1) EU-driven financial…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:12.812Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03104-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03104.json","name":"documents/hd03104.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03252.json","name":"documents/hd03252.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03253.json","name":"documents/hd03253.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03256-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03256.json","name":"documents/hd03256.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Propositions ( batch)","description":"On 23 April 2026 the Kristersson government (Tidö coalition — M, KD, L + SD confidence partner) tabled 4 parliamentary documents dominated by two strategic priorities: (1) EU-driven financial…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:34.385Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03104-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03104.json","name":"documents/hd03104.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03252.json","name":"documents/hd03252.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03253.json","name":"documents/hd03253.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03256-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03256.json","name":"documents/hd03256.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>On 23 April 2026 the Kristersson government (Tidö coalition — M, KD, L + SD confidence partner) tabled <strong>4 parliamentary documents</strong> dominated by two strategic priorities: (1) <strong>EU-driven financial regulation</strong> with Prop. 2025/26:253 (EU Banking Package, CRR3/CRD6 transposition — Admiralty B2) and (2) <strong>Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation</strong> with Prop. 2025/26:252 (benefit restrictions for detainees). A debt-management evaluation skrivelse (Skr. 2025/26:104) and a tachograph-enforcement bill (Prop. 2025/26:256) complete the batch. The highest-weight item (Prop. 2025/26:253, DIW <strong>3.8</strong>) is systemic — it reshapes capital requirements for Sweden's four systemically-important banks ahead of Riksbanken's next rate decision.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     A[📜 4 Propositions&#x3C;br/>23 April 2026] --> B[Financial Regulation Track]
@@ -233,13 +233,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
     style B2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
     style C1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
     style C2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Financial-markets desk</strong>: Brief clients on Prop. 2025/26:253 capital-floor impact for Handelsbanken/SEB IRB books ahead of Q2 earnings. <strong>Trigger</strong>: Riksbanken MPC comment at next meeting. Confidence: <strong>HIGH</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>Civil-society / legal</strong>: Prepare Advokatsamfundet remiss challenge to Prop. 2025/26:252 proportionality (Art. 9 GDPR special-category data in benefits assessment; ECHR Art. 8 privacy). <strong>Trigger</strong>: SfU committee referral opens. Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>Political-risk desk</strong>: Monitor V/S/MP pushback framing on Prop. 2025/26:252 as "punishment of poverty" — potential coalition-cohesion test for Tidö parties (L historically more reluctant on punitive social-policy). Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Most significant</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:253 — EU bankpaket (DIW 3.8, Admiralty B2). Transposes CRR3/CRD6; raises RWA floors for big-4 Swedish banks.</li>
 <li><strong>Most controversial</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:252 — benefit restrictions for detainees (DIW 3.5). Civil-liberty flashpoint.</li>
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li><strong>Most symbolic</strong>: Skr. 2025/26:104 — 5-year debt-management evaluation; fiscal-credibility signal into 2026 election cycle.</li>
 <li><strong>Common thread</strong>: All 4 signed by PM Kristersson; 2 by Finance Minister Wykman → Finansdepartementet carries 50% of the day's legislative load.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h">Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h">Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h3>
 <p>🔴 <strong>SfU committee referral for Prop. 2025/26:252</strong> — if opposition (V, S, MP) coordinate on proportionality objections, this becomes the first Tidö criminal-justice bill to face unified opposition legal challenge in 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decisions-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decisions-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Flag banking-sector capital impact</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:253 FiU hearing</td><td>2–4 weeks</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Remiss challenge preparation</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:252 SfU referral</td><td>1 week</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition-cohesion monitoring</td><td>L/KD divergence signal</td><td>4–8 weeks</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Tier 1 (systemic)</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:253 transposition delay → EU infringement exposure.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier 2 (political)</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:252 — ECHR/ECtHR-based rights challenge possible.</li>
@@ -289,12 +289,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <p><strong>Evidence base</strong>: 4 primary-source documents (Riksdagen API) + fiscal-framework context. Single-source dependency flagged in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a>.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The Kristersson government's 23 April 2026 proposition bundle combines <strong>EU-mandated financial regulation</strong> (HD03253 — EU Banking Package) with <strong>Tidö-era criminal-justice operationalisation</strong> (HD03252 — detainee benefit restrictions), positioning both for summer-session enactment. The package signals a government pivoting from "new laws" to "implementation mode" roughly 16 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -357,24 +357,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style R4 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style FIN fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style CJ fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Thematic convergence</strong>: Two propositions (HD03252, HD03256) expand <strong>state coercive authority</strong> (benefit restriction, search powers); two (HD03253, HD03104) <strong>institutionalise financial governance</strong>. This is the profile of a government preparing its <strong>election legacy</strong>: "We delivered financial stability + public order." Whether the Riksdag will enact all four before the summer recess (late June) depends on FiU and SfU committee bandwidth.</p>
 <p><strong>Implementation cluster</strong>: HD03252 (1 Aug 2026) and HD03256 (1 Jul 2026) carry hard effective dates — the government is front-loading <strong>visible enforcement</strong> before the election. HD03253 follows the EU timeline and cannot be politically rushed.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition load-bearing</strong>: All 4 documents signed by PM Kristersson. Ministerial diversity: Wykman (M, finance ×2), Strömmer (M, justice), Carlson (KD, infra). L gets no lead ministry role in today's batch — <strong>consistent with L's reduced legislative footprint since the 2024–25 coalition strain over criminal-justice proportionality</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EN headline (72 chars)</strong>: "Kristersson's pivot: EU bank rules, detainee benefits, truck-fraud law"</li>
 <li><strong>SV headline (75 chars)</strong>: "Kristerssons växel: EU-bankregler, häktesförmåner och färdskrivarlag"</li>
 <li><strong>EN meta description (158 chars)</strong>: "Four government bills signed 23 April 2026 reshape Sweden's banking capital rules, restrict detainee benefits, target tachograph fraud, and evaluate debt mgmt."</li>
 <li><strong>Primary keywords</strong>: EU banking package, Basel III endgame, säkerhetsförvaring, kontrollerat boende, färdskrivare, Tidö-avtalet, Niklas Wykman, Ulf Kristersson.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>With motions pipeline</strong>: Opposition motions on HD03252 expected within 15-day deadline (by ~8 May 2026).</li>
 <li><strong>With committee-reports pipeline</strong>: FiU will need to report HD03253 ahead of summer recess (~20 June).</li>
 <li><strong>With interpellations</strong>: V/S likely to file on HD03252 proportionality; KD to support HD03256.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH</strong>: Document identity, authors, effective dates (A1 primary-source).</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM</strong>: Enactment probability (depends on party whip behaviour — see <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code>).</li>
@@ -382,32 +382,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" ari
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Audience</strong>: Decision-makers in financial markets, political risk, civil society.
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public OSINT.
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: The Kristersson government has transitioned from "new policy" to "implementation mode" 16 months ahead of the September 2026 Riksdag election, as evidenced by 2 bills in today's batch carrying hard pre-election effective dates.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> effective 1 August 2026; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> effective 1 July 2026; no new programmatic announcements today.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong> (multiple corroborating documents; Admiralty B2).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (EU Banking Package transposition) is the single most consequential document in today's batch for Sweden's financial sector, reshaping capital requirements for the 4 systemically-important banks (Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Proposition explicitly cites CRR3/CRD6 directives; Finansdepartementet-led with FI operational role; DIW 3.8 (highest in batch).</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is the politically highest-risk document of the batch. Probability of material amendment during committee stage is <strong>~25%</strong> (P2 scenario — see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande already issued (Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>); historical proportionality sensitivity in Swedish social-insurance law.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (single-source dependency on document text; opposition positioning not yet public).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: Sweden faces an EU Commission infringement-risk window of ~90 days on late CRR3 transposition (scenario S3, probability 20%).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: CRR3 transposition deadline January 2026; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> tabled only 23 April 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5) — LOW confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5) — LOW confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: Coalition cohesion will hold on all 4 votes, including <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: L has historically pushed back on punitive social-policy but has not publicly broken with Tidö on HD03252-adjacent bills 2023–25.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>LOW</strong> — single precedent class, future behaviour contingent on whip calibration. See <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: FiU committee referral decisions on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> — publication of hearing list (expected within 2 weeks).</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: SfU committee referral + remiss summary on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> — flag any dissenting remissinstans position from Advokatsamfundet, Barnombudsmannen, or JO.</li>
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Inte
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande text — deep-read for proportionality specifics on HD03252.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong>: Försäkringskassan IT readiness statement for 1 Aug 2026 cut-over.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -449,16 +449,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Evidence base</th><th>If wrong, then …</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition holds</td><td>2023–25 voting record</td><td>HD03252 fails or is amended</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission follows normal 90-day procedure</td><td>Historical infringement-procedure pattern</td><td>Earlier/harder action on HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet critique is mild</td><td>Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> (not yet parsed)</td><td>Scenario S2 probability rises</td></tr><tr><td>Försäkringskassan can deliver IT in 3 months</td><td>§7 konsekvenser of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Effective date slips</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>No SCB data on current incarcerated-persons benefits baseline (would improve KJ-3 confidence).</li>
 <li>No Riksbanken statement on CRR3 interaction with monetary policy.</li>
 <li>No internal party-group position statements yet.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Decision-Informational-Weighting (DIW) per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §DIW. Scores on 0–5 scale.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-table-ranked">Scoring table (ranked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-table-ranked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-table-ranked">Scoring table (ranked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-table-ranked"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -525,18 +525,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-table-ranked">Scoring table (ranked)<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style R2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style R3 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style R4 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If <strong>HD03253's</strong> RWA-floor impact turns out bigger than QIS (> 8% CET1 hit on Handelsbanken), score rises to <strong>4.3</strong> (L3 Intelligence-grade). <strong>Trigger indicator</strong>: Finansinspektionen QIS publication, expected Q3 2026.</li>
 <li>If <strong>HD03252</strong> triggers Lagrådet second opinion on proportionality, score rises to <strong>4.0</strong>. <strong>Trigger</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande already exists per Bilaga 5 of the proposition — scope for Pass-2 deep-read (HD03252 text page ~49).</li>
 <li>If <strong>HD03256</strong> enforcement provokes union response (Transportarbetareförbundet), political salience multiplies.</li>
 <li>If <strong>HD03104</strong> evaluation attracts IMF Article IV citation, external-credibility weight rises.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-anti-fabrication-check">Anti-fabrication check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-fabrication-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-anti-fabrication-check">Anti-fabrication check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-fabrication-check"></a></h3>
 <p>Every ranked item cites its <code>dok_id</code> and resolvable URL on riksdagen.se. No claim in this table is unevidenced. Sources diversity is <strong>single-channel</strong> (Riksdagen API only) — flagged for Pass-2 enrichment with SCB / Riksbanken / Finansinspektionen statements in a later aggregation run.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predicted">Per-party framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predicted"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-per-party-framing-predicted">Per-party framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predicted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predicted">Per-party framing (predicted)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>HD03252 frame</th><th>HD03253 frame</th><th>HD03256 frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>"Fairness: criminals shouldn't live at taxpayers' expense"</td><td>"Sweden delivers on EU financial stability"</td><td>"Protecting honest hauliers"</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>"Law and order — consequences matter"</td><td>neutral-positive</td><td>"Road safety for families"</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>Cautious support; emphasises safeguards</td><td>Pro-EU</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Strong endorsement; ties to migration-crime narrative</td><td>neutral</td><td>Strong endorsement</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Silent or measured critique (triangulate)</td><td>Tactical support ("we negotiated the EU framework")</td><td>Measured support</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>"Punishing poverty behind bars — class justice"</td><td>neutral</td><td>"Police powers expand — why?"</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>"Rights erosion — where is proportionality?"</td><td>neutral</td><td>"Good intent, but oversight?"</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Split — business-friendly on HD03256; cautious on HD03252</td><td>Small-bank proportionality concerns</td><td>Support</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted">Press-quadrant framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted">Press-quadrant framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -624,20 +624,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted">Press-quadrant framing (predicted)<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Expected frame on HD03252</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Right-of-centre (SvD, Expressen ledarsida)</td><td>Supportive — "common sense"</td></tr><tr><td>Centre-right (DN ledarsida)</td><td>Conditional support — "proportionality must be verified"</td></tr><tr><td>Centre-left (Aftonbladet ledarsida)</td><td>Critical — "justice, not punishment"</td></tr><tr><td>Left-of-centre (ETC, Flamman)</td><td>Strongly critical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-platform-framing-predicted">Platform framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-platform-framing-predicted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-platform-framing-predicted">Platform framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-platform-framing-predicted"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>X / Twitter Sweden</strong>: Polarised — M/KD/SD supporters amplify "fair consequence"; V/MP amplify "rights erosion". <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> gets low engagement (technical).</li>
 <li><strong>TV4 / SVT news</strong>: Framing as bundle — expect 2-minute explainer on all four bills (high production), 15-minute Agenda segment on HD03252 alone.</li>
 <li><strong>Podcasts (Aftonbladet Ledaren, DN Åsikt)</strong>: HD03252 deep-dive likely within 7 days.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry">Longitudinal frame record entry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry">Longitudinal frame record entry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-24. <strong>Bundle</strong>: HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104. <strong>Dominant elite frame</strong>: "government delivers on Tidö-avtalet". <strong>Dominant critical frame</strong>: "proportionality question on HD03252". <strong>Next inflection point</strong>: SfU committee hearing schedule publication.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <p>All framings are predictive, based on 2023–2025 editorial pattern observation. Empirical confirmation awaits Day+1 to Day+7 media capture — recommended follow-up in <code>evening-analysis</code> or <code>weekly-review</code> workflow.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Per <code>analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md</code> — lenses: Government, Opposition, Institutions, Affected citizens, Economic actors, International.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Actor</th><th>Position on bundle</th><th>Key document</th><th>Leverage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government</td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td><td>Signatory on all 4; owns whole bundle</td><td>All</td><td>Executive authority</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>Finance Min. Niklas Wykman (M)</td><td>Leads HD03253, HD03104</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Finansdep. portfolio</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>Justice Min. Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Leads HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Justitiedep. portfolio</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>Infra Min. Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Leads HD03256 — only KD-led bill today</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Landsbygdsdep.</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>SD parliamentary group</td><td>Confidence-support on all 4 (Tidö-avtalet)</td><td>All</td><td>73 mandates pivotal</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Magdalena Andersson (S)</td><td>Expected tactical support on HD03253 (pro-EU); opposed on HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>107 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</td><td>Strongly opposed to HD03252 (class-justice framing)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>24 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Märta Stenevi / Daniel Helldén (MP)</td><td>Opposed to HD03252; conditional on HD03256</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>18 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Muharrem Demirok (C)</td><td>Likely split — business-friendly on HD03256, cautious on HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>24 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Has issued yttrande on HD03252 (Bilaga 5)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Constitutional review</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Riksgälden</td><td>Subject of HD03104 evaluation</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Debt-management execution</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Finansinspektionen</td><td>Gains supervisory toolkit under HD03253</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Prudential authority</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Försäkringskassan</td><td>Operational burden under HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Benefit administration</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Polismyndigheten</td><td>New search powers under HD03256</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Enforcement</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Kriminalvården</td><td>Administers säkerhetsförvaring + kontrollerat boende</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Prison system</td></tr><tr><td>Affected</td><td>Incarcerated persons + families</td><td>Loss of benefits, obligation to pay upkeep</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Limited voice; via Advokatsamfundet</td></tr><tr><td>Affected</td><td>Truck drivers / transport workers</td><td>Subject to new search powers</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Transportarbetareförbundet</td></tr><tr><td>Economic</td><td>Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea</td><td>CRR3 capital impact (IRB users most affected)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>~SEK 6 trn combined balance sheet</td></tr><tr><td>Economic</td><td>Sparbanker</td><td>Proportionality concerns</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Rural financial services</td></tr><tr><td>Economic</td><td>Transportföretagen</td><td>Supports HD03256 (anti-cheating)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Industry lobby</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>EU Commission</td><td>Expects prompt CRR3 transposition</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Infringement procedure</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>IMF Article IV</td><td>Will reference HD03104 evaluation</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>External credibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     PM[Ulf Kristersson PM] --> FM[Niklas Wykman FinMin]
     PM --> JM[Gunnar Strömmer JusMin]
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style FM fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style JM fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style IM fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-winners--losers-summary">Winners / losers summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winners--losers-summary">Winners / losers summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -859,28 +859,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-winners--losers-summary">Winners / losers summary<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th>Winners</th><th>Losers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>FI, depositors, EU alignment</td><td>Big-4 banks (IRB users); Sparbanker</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Tidö parties narrative; Kriminalvården rules clarity</td><td>Incarcerated + dependants; possibly L reputation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Legitimate hauliers; Polismyndigheten</td><td>Rogue operators; civil-liberty advocates</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>Finansdep. narrative; Riksgälden validation</td><td>Opposition critique bandwidth</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Horizons</strong>: 72 h / 1 week / 1 month / Election (Sep 2026).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27">72-hour window (by 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27">72-hour window (by 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>2026-04-24 to 2026-04-27</strong> — Opposition party-group first statements on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> (V, MP, S coordination signal).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-25</strong> — Swedish financial press (DI, Affärsvärlden) commentary on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> RWA impact.</li>
 <li><strong>+72h</strong> — SvD and DN ledarsida editorials on bundle.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01">1-week window (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01">1-week window (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
 <ol start="4">
 <li><strong>2026-04-28 to 2026-05-01</strong> — Committee referral decisions (FiU for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>, SfU for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>, TU for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-01</strong> — Advokatsamfundet position statement on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> proportionality.</li>
 <li><strong>+1 week</strong> — Bankföreningen public comment on CRR3 output-floor (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24">1-month window (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24">1-month window (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24"></a></h3>
 <ol start="7">
 <li><strong>2026-05-08</strong> — Opposition motion-filing deadline (15 days) on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-15</strong> — First FiU hearing on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (typical timetable).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-24</strong> — Finansinspektionen QIS snapshot for CRR3.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-30</strong> — Försäkringskassan IT readiness statement for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> 1 Aug cut-over.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day">Election window (by 2026-09-13, election day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day">Election window (by 2026-09-13, election day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day"></a></h3>
 <ol start="11">
 <li><strong>2026-06-15</strong> — Kammaren vote on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (pre-recess target).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-06-20</strong> — Kammaren vote on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> (or deferred post-recess if Scenario S2).</li>
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day">Election window (by 2026-
 <li><strong>2026-08-01</strong> — <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> effective date — election-year operational reality.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-09-13</strong> — Riksdag election — retrospective scorecard on bundle delivery.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard">Indicator scoring dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard">Indicator scoring dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title Forward indicator horizon
     section 72h
@@ -903,21 +903,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard">Indicator scoring dashboard<a class="" a
         2026-07-01 : HD03256 effective
         2026-08-01 : HD03252 effective
         2026-09-13 : Election day</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-anti-vagueness-check">Anti-vagueness check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-vagueness-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-anti-vagueness-check">Anti-vagueness check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-vagueness-check"></a></h3>
 <p>All 15 indicators have an explicit date, source anchor, and evidenced mechanism. Admiralty codes B2-C3 depending on whether the indicator is scheduled (deterministic) vs. behavioural (probabilistic).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Horizon</strong>: Riksdag summer recess (June 2026) → September 2026 election → first post-election cycle.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45">Scenario 1 — "Clean enactment" (probability 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45">Scenario 1 — "Clean enactment" (probability 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: All 4 bills enacted on schedule. HD03256 effective 1 July, HD03252 effective 1 August, HD03253 in force per EU timetable, HD03104 noted. Tidö framing succeeds: "law and order + sound money."</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: FiU committee report on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> published without amendments by mid-June 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25">Scenario 2 — "Lagrådet-forced redraft of HD03252" (probability 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25">Scenario 2 — "Lagrådet-forced redraft of HD03252" (probability 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande critique on proportionality (visible in Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>) prompts SfU to amend. Effective date slips to 1 Oct 2026 — post-election. Electoral "delivered" message weakens.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: SfU schedules ≥ 2 hearings with rights-focused remissinstanser in May 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20">Scenario 3 — "EU infringement squeeze on HD03253" (probability 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20">Scenario 3 — "EU infringement squeeze on HD03253" (probability 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: EU Commission issues reasoned opinion on late CRR3 transposition before Swedish enactment. Government accelerates FiU timetable. Industry consultation short-circuited → harsher-than-necessary output-floor calibration for Handelsbanken/SEB.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: DG FISMA communication to Stockholm in May; press leak to Financial Times.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10">Scenario 4 — "Bundle dilution success" (probability 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10">Scenario 4 — "Bundle dilution success" (probability 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: 4-bill bundle strategy works: media attention fragmented; opposition coordination fails. All enacted without significant amendment.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Major dailies (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet) devote &#x3C; 500 words combined to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> in first 72 h.</p>
 <p><strong>Total: 100%</strong></p>
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10">Scenario 4 — "B
     "S2 Lagrådet redraft" : 25
     "S3 EU infringement squeeze" : 20
     "S4 Bundle dilution" : 10</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators">Scenario-specific forward indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators">Scenario-specific forward indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -964,9 +964,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators">Scenario-specific forward indic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>72-h indicator</th><th>1-week indicator</th><th>1-month indicator</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>No opposition joint motion filed</td><td>FiU hearing calendar published</td><td>Committee report drafted</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Lagrådet media commentary</td><td>≥ 3 rights-focused op-eds</td><td>SfU amendment proposal</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>EU Commission statement</td><td>Bankföreningen public position</td><td>Revised FiU timetable</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>&#x3C; 500 words press coverage</td><td>Opposition fragmented on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>All 4 in summer recess schedule</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: per <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> — dimensions: Political, Institutional, Economic, Social/Rights, Operational.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L (1–5)</th><th align="center">I (1–5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>dok_id anchor</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>Economic</td><td>Output-floor adoption causes procyclical credit contraction at Handelsbanken/SEB</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Phased transition, FI/Riksbanken coordination</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>Social/Rights</td><td>Benefit restriction disproportionately impacts detainees with dependants → ECHR Art. 8</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Lagrådet review; proportionality clause in beredning</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>Political</td><td>Opposition (V/S/MP) unified motion against HD03252 during committee stage</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>M/KD/L/SD whip discipline</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Polismyndigheten/Transportstyrelsen lacks capacity to operationalise search powers</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Budget allocation in höstbudget; training ramp</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>Economic</td><td>Late CRR3 transposition → EU Commission infringement procedure</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">8</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Accelerated FiU timetable</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>Political</td><td>HD03252 becomes 2026 election attack vector against Tidö</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Messaging discipline; frame as "fair responsibility"</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Operational</td><td>Försäkringskassan IT changes to implement benefit-restriction logic by 1 Aug 2026</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">12</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>§7 konsekvenser in proposition — implementation timeline flagged</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Lagrådet's existing yttrande on HD03252 contains proportionality critique not yet fully addressed</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 5</td><td>SfU redrafts during committee</td></tr><tr><td>R9</td><td>Economic</td><td>Debt-management evaluation (HD03104) exposes opposition attack lines on pandemic-era borrowing</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Government narrative preparation</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Social/Rights</td><td>Expanded search powers (HD03256) criticised by Advokatsamfundet</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Proportionality safeguards in §5.2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk heat map (L × I)
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -1102,12 +1102,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     "R8 Lagrådet gap": [0.55, 0.55]
     "R9 Debt eval attack": [0.35, 0.35]
     "R10 Search-power critique": [0.35, 0.35]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R7 → R2 → R3 → R6</strong>: Försäkringskassan IT slippage delays <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> implementation, opening the door for rights-based critique, enabling opposition motion, escalating to 2026 election attack.</li>
 <li><strong>R5 → R1</strong>: Late CRR3 transposition → accelerated FiU timetable → insufficient industry consultation → harsher-than-necessary capital impact on Swedish banks.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-bayesian-posterior-notes">Bayesian posterior notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-posterior-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-posterior-notes">Bayesian posterior notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-posterior-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Prior (P(Tidö delivers HD03252 on schedule))</strong>: 0.7 (based on Tidö's 2023–25 legislative track record).</li>
 <li><strong>Posterior given Lagrådet yttrande exists but with proportionality comments</strong>: 0.55 — reduced by the signal that legal review flagged issues.</li>
@@ -1115,9 +1115,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-bayesian-posterior-notes">Bayesian posterior notes<a class="" aria-hi
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Sources</strong>: All risks anchored to document text at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">riksdagen.se</a> and <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a>. Admiralty code B2 (usually reliable source, probably true — government proposition text).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Unit of analysis</strong>: The Kristersson government's 23 April 2026 proposition bundle as a whole (HD03253, HD03252, HD03256, HD03104).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">S1</td><td>Technocratic preparedness — EU transposition delivered via standard CRR3/CRD6 machinery.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> "EU:s kapitaltäckningsdirektiv" motivation text; Finansinspektionen remiss.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S2</td><td>Tidö coalition remains operationally cohesive — all 4 signed by PM Kristersson with M/KD ministers delivering on programme.</td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03104 (M ministers); <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> (KD Carlson).</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S3</td><td>Deliverable record before September 2026 election — hard effective dates (1 Jul, 1 Aug 2026).</td><td>Explicit in <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> "träda i kraft den 1 augusti 2026"; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> "1 juli 2026".</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S4</td><td>Reporting discipline — debt-management evaluation per Budgetlagen submitted on cycle.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> submitted to Riksdagen on statutory quinquennial schedule.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">W1</td><td>Late transposition of EU banking package — Sweden behind CRR3 deadline.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> ärendet-och-dess-beredning section; EU transposition deadline was January 2026.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W2</td><td>Proportionality exposure on detainee benefits — civil-liberty backlash risk.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 5 Lagrådets yttrande; implicates regeringsformen 2 kap. 12 § and ECHR Art. 8.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W3</td><td>Enforcement-capacity gap — tachograph law requires new investigative capability at Polismyndigheten and bilinspektörer.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> §5 on new powers; implicit resource question.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W4</td><td>Narrow messaging bandwidth — 4 bills on same day dilute press coverage.</td><td>Pattern observation across <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">riksdagen.se</a> batch-publication days.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">O1</td><td>Financial-stability credential: Sweden aligns with EU Banking Union standard.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> transposes CRR3/CRD6 verbatim.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O2</td><td>Tidö signature reform on criminal justice operational before election.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> effective 1 Aug 2026 — ~5 weeks before election day.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O3</td><td>Business-community goodwill: tachograph crackdown protects legitimate hauliers.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> supports Transportföretagen competitive fairness.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O4</td><td>Frame 2021–2025 debt management as success story.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> skrivelse lets government set the narrative.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">T1</td><td>Opposition coordination on HD03252 proportionality — V/S/MP joint motion possible.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 3 remissinstanserna includes civil-society bodies likely to object.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T2</td><td>Bank-sector pushback on CRR3 output floor — political lobbying during FiU referral.</td><td>Historical pattern on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>-class transposition bills; Swedish banks have active public-affairs presence.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T3</td><td>Opportunity-cost narrative — "government pushing 4 bills while neglecting X".</td><td>Opposition framing risk; no concrete evidence yet on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a>.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T4</td><td>Lagrådet critique on HD03252 could force redraft during committee stage.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 5 Lagrådets yttrande already issued — depth of critique to be assessed in Pass 2.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies">TOWS matrix (integrated strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies">TOWS matrix (integrated strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1267,12 +1267,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies">TOWS matrix (integrated strategies
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Combine S1 technocratic credibility with O1 EU alignment → position Kristersson as "competent EU player" into election. Evidence: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>.</td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Use S2 cohesion to suppress T1 coordination — whip discipline on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> vote.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Address W1 late transposition by invoking O1 completion narrative. Evidence: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>.</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: If W2 proportionality challenge + T4 Lagrådet line up, government must redraft — monitor <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> committee timetable.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant pattern is <strong>"competence vs. rights"</strong> — the government's execution strengths (S1, S2) are challenged by proportionality threats (W2, T4) on HD03252. <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> is structurally safer (EU-mandated, technical); <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is where political risk concentrates.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: HIGH · <strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH (TH1, TH2, TH4) / MEDIUM (TH3, TH5) · <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A2 — primary-source proposition texts HD03252/HD03253/HD03256, FiU referral phase observable).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Threat taxonomy mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Threat taxonomy mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Threat taxonomy mapping<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat category</th><th>Specific threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Target</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TH1</td><td>Regulatory capture</td><td>Big-4 banks lobby FiU committee to dilute CRR3 output floor</td><td>Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea via Svenska Bankföreningen</td><td>Parliamentary committee</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> referral phase</td></tr><tr><td>TH2</td><td>Rights erosion</td><td>Benefit restrictions + säkerhetsförvaring combine to create indefinite-detention-with-reduced-entitlements cohort</td><td>Government (policy intent)</td><td>Incarcerated persons + dependants</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> §4–5</td></tr><tr><td>TH3</td><td>Mission creep</td><td>Search powers for bilinspektörer (civilian inspectors) normalise warrantless search in transport sector</td><td>Polismyndigheten + Transportstyrelsen</td><td>Transport workers</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> §5.2</td></tr><tr><td>TH4</td><td>Information asymmetry</td><td>4-bill bundle on same day suppresses individual scrutiny of HD03252</td><td>Government comms</td><td>Media / opposition oversight</td><td>Pattern observation 23 April 2026</td></tr><tr><td>TH5</td><td>Coalition instability</td><td>L party (historically more liberal on criminal justice) may rebel on HD03252</td><td>L parliamentary group</td><td>Tidö cohesion</td><td>See <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path">Attack tree — HD03252 rights-erosion path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path">Attack tree — HD03252 rights-erosion path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL[Rights erosion for&#x3C;br/>incarcerated cohort] --> M1[Direct: benefit restriction]
     GOAL --> M2[Indirect: reduced legal aid access]
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path">Attack tree — HD03252 rig
     S3 --> E1
     style GOAL fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style E1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture">Kill-chain-style mapping (TH1 regulatory capture)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture">Kill-chain-style mapping (TH1 regulatory capture)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Recon</strong>: Bankföreningen reviews <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> §3 ärendet-och-dess-beredning.</li>
 <li><strong>Weaponisation</strong>: Technical impact study commissioned (CET1 hit estimation).</li>
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture">Kill-chain-style map
 <li><strong>Command &#x26; control</strong>: Minority-government whip calibration.</li>
 <li><strong>Objective</strong>: Softer effective capital requirements in Swedish implementation than pure EU baseline.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy">MITRE-style TTP map (political-analogy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy">MITRE-style TTP map (political-analogy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy">MITRE-style TTP map (political
 <p><strong>Sources</strong>: All threats anchor to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a> document text; no speculative attribution to specific actors.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03104">HD03104<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03104"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03104-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Skrivelse (evaluation report)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Finansdepartementet
@@ -1399,16 +1399,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03104">HD03104<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 2.5 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: N/A (reporting document)
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Statutory 4-year evaluation of state debt management 2021–2025, including cost-minimisation outcomes, Riksgälden's strategy, and interaction with Riksbanken monetary policy. Covers pandemic-era borrowing, quantitative-tightening environment, and real-rate normalisation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Niklas Wykman (M))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (FiU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104">Key provisions (Skr. 2025/26:104)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104">Key provisions (Skr. 2025/26:104)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03104 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1441,19 +1441,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Inledning</td><td>Framing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Mål och strategi</td><td>Baseline against targets</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Kostnad + risk 2021–2025</td><td>Outcome metrics</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Reflektioner</td><td>Forward strategy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 2.5 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Annual reporting cadence, moderate market-shaping power, low electoral salience → solid mid-band.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</li>
 <li>Opposition: partial-cycle framing power (V/MP on rights, S on EU compliance credit).</li>
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" a
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03104" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03104 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03104.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1503,16 +1503,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03104", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03104.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><em>Traceability note: This heading is a shortened paraphrase for readability. For authoritative cross-referencing, use the official document title (<code>titel</code>) in <code>documents/hd03252.json</code> together with dok_id <code>HD03252</code>.</em></p>
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Proposition (ordinary law)
@@ -1523,16 +1523,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 3.5 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: 1 August 2026
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Restricts access to specified social-insurance benefits (bostadstillägg, aktivitetsersättning, sjukersättning components) for persons placed in kontrollerat boende or säkerhetsförvaring (security detention). Introduces calibrated exceptions for dependant-support. Lagrådet yttrande attached as Bilaga 5.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-1">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-1">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Gunnar Strömmer (M))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (SfU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map-1">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map-1">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03252 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1575,19 +1575,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map-1">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Förslag till riksdagsbeslut</td><td>Decision scope</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Bakgrund och skäl</td><td>Policy rationale</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Lagändringar</td><td>Statutory text</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Ikraftträdande</td><td>Effective date + transitional</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Konsekvenser</td><td>Budget/IT/operational impact</td></tr><tr><td>Bilaga 5</td><td>Lagrådets yttrande</td><td>Constitutional review</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes-1">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength-1">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes-1">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength-1">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration-1">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration-1">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-1"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 3.5 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Rights-dimension interaction + pre-election effective date + opposition-polarisation potential → upper mid-band.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <p>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</p>
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1">Stakeholder pressure points<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-1">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-1">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03252" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-1">Cross-references to batch<a class="" ari
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03252 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03252.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1642,16 +1642,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-1">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-1">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03252", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03252.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer-1">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer-1">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Proposition (EU transposition)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Finansdepartementet
@@ -1661,16 +1661,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 3.8 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: Staggered per EU timetable (main provisions 1 January 2027 with transitional output-floor phase-in)
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Transposes CRR3 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1623) and CRD6 (Directive (EU) 2024/1619) into Swedish law. Implements Basel III endgame framework — output floor, revised standardised approach, operational-risk calibration. Amends kapitaltäckningslagen (2014:966) and lag om kapitalbuffertar (2014:966).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-2">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-2">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Niklas Wykman (M))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (FiU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:253)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map-2">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:253)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map-2">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-2"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03253 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1708,19 +1708,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map-2">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Förslag till riksdagsbeslut</td><td>Decision scope</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Bakgrund och skäl</td><td>Policy rationale</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Lagändringar</td><td>Statutory text</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Ikraftträdande</td><td>Effective date + transitional</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Konsekvenser</td><td>Budget/IT/operational impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes-2">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength-2">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes-2">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength-2">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration-2">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration-2">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-2"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 3.8 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Systemic financial impact (4 banks), EU mandate, late transposition, sector lobbying → top of batch.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <p>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</p>
@@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2">Stakeholder pressure points<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-2">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-2">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03253" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1743,7 +1743,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-2">Cross-references to batch<a class="" ari
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03253 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03253.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1775,16 +1775,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-2">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-2">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03253", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03253.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer-2">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer-2">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03256">HD03256<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03256"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03256-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Proposition (ordinary law)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdepartementet
@@ -1794,16 +1794,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03256">HD03256<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 2.8 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: 1 July 2026
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Expands enforcement powers for police and vehicle inspectors to detect and prosecute tachograph manipulation in heavy-goods road transport. Raises fines, expands inspection authority, clarifies criminal liability for fleet operators. Implements parts of EU Mobility Package enforcement directive.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-3">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-3">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Andreas Carlson (KD))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (TU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:256)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map-3">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:256)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map-3">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-3"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03256 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1841,19 +1841,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map-3">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Förslag till riksdagsbeslut</td><td>Decision scope</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Bakgrund och skäl</td><td>Policy rationale</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Lagändringar</td><td>Statutory text</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Ikraftträdande</td><td>Effective date + transitional</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Konsekvenser</td><td>Budget/IT/operational impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes-3">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-3"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength-3">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes-3">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength-3">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration-3">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration-3">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-3"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 2.8 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sectoral (road transport) with narrow direct electorate; enforcement lever vs. sectoral manipulation base rates → mid-band.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <p>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</p>
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3">Stakeholder pressure points<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-3">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-3">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03256" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1876,7 +1876,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-3">Cross-references to batch<a class="" ari
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03256 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03256.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1908,18 +1908,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-3">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-3">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03256", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03256.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer-3">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer-3">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Electoral horizon</strong>: September 2026 Riksdag general election (~20 weeks out).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative">Seat-projection deltas (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative">Seat-projection deltas (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1952,7 +1952,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative">Seat-projection deltas (qualitati
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th>Likely net M/KD/L/SD effect</th><th>Likely net S/V/MP/C effect</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>+ law-and-order narrative; KD/SD benefit most</td><td>V opposition galvanises but modest (S avoids issue)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>+ competence signal; M benefits</td><td>S may claim co-authorship of EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>+ "tough on crime" adjunct; KD/SD benefit</td><td>Marginal</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>+ fiscal-credibility; M benefits</td><td>Potential opposition attack if data unfavourable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Net effect: <strong>Tidö parties gain marginal advantage from bundle</strong> — ~0.5–1.5 percentage points in aggregate, clustered in law-and-order-sensitive voter segments. See <code>voter-segmentation.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-election">Coalition viability post-election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-election">Coalition viability post-election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-election"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If Tidö parties (M, KD, L, SD) retain majority → bundle's enforcement dates (1 Jul, 1 Aug) fall before election day — "delivered" narrative available.</li>
 <li>If opposition (S-led) wins → probability of repeal: HD03252 <strong>30%</strong>, HD03253 <strong>&#x3C; 5%</strong> (EU-mandated), HD03256 <strong>&#x3C; 10%</strong>, HD03104 <strong>0%</strong> (reporting only).</li>
@@ -1969,14 +1969,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-election">Coalition viability post-election<
     style Bundle fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
     style W fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style L fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery">Risk to electoral delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery">Risk to electoral delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> slippage (S2 scenario, 25%) would strip Tidö's "delivered" line → estimated -0.3 pp net.</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> is election-neutral for voters but salient for elite opinion (editorial boards, business lobby).</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate">Current seat map (Riksdag 2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate">Current seat map (Riksdag 2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate">Current seat map (Riksdag 2022
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Seats</th><th>Coalition</th><th>Whip discipline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S (Socialdemokraterna)</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Tidö (gov)</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Tidö confidence</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>C (Centerpartiet)</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Tidö (gov)</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>L (Liberalerna)</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Tidö (gov)</td><td><strong>Medium</strong> (rebellion risk on rights issues)</td></tr><tr><td>MP (Miljöpartiet)</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö bloc</strong> (M+KD+L+SD)</td><td align="center"><strong>176</strong></td><td></td><td>Majority = 175 — Tidö holds <strong>+1</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition</strong> (S+V+C+MP)</td><td align="center"><strong>173</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill">Pivotal votes per bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill">Pivotal votes per bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill">Pivotal votes per bill<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">Majority needed</th><th align="center">Tidö bloc</th><th align="center">Margin</th><th>Pivotal scenario</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td align="center">175 Ja</td><td align="center">176 Ja</td><td align="center"><strong>+1</strong></td><td>2 L rebels = defeat</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td align="center">175 Ja</td><td align="center">176 Ja (+ likely S tactical Ja on EU)</td><td align="center">~+100</td><td>Safe (EU-mandated)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td align="center">175 Ja</td><td align="center">176 Ja (likely + C)</td><td align="center">~+50</td><td>Safe</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td align="center">Notering (no vote)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-vote-hd03252">Critical vote: HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-vote-hd03252"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-vote-hd03252">Critical vote: HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-vote-hd03252"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>+1 margin</strong> is the binding constraint of the Tidö minority-support framework. Two scenarios change arithmetic:</p>
 
 
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-critical-vote-hd03252">Critical vote: HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Outcome</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L whip holds</td><td>176 Ja → bill passes</td><td align="center">70%</td></tr><tr><td>1 L MP abstains</td><td>175 Ja → still passes (simple majority on Ja count)</td><td align="center">20%</td></tr><tr><td>2+ L MPs abstain or vote Nej</td><td>Bill fails or must be amended</td><td align="center">10%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario">Sainte-Laguë projection (2026 baseline scenario)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario">Sainte-Laguë projection (2026 baseline scenario)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario"></a></h3>
 <p>Assuming +2pp M/KD aggregate shift (partly attributable to delivery bundle) and -1.5pp L shift:</p>
 
 
@@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario">Sainte-Laguë projec
     y-axis "Seats" 150 --> 185
     bar [176, 179]
     line [173, 170]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference">Vote-count discipline historical reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference">Vote-count discipline historical reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2223,8 +2223,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference">Vote-count discipline his
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Past vote</th><th align="center">Tidö bloc Ja</th><th align="center">L rebels</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01CU27 Barnkonventionen (2023)</td><td align="center">175</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>Tidö migration reform 2024</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Säkerhetsförvaring lag (2024/25)</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>On <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>-type rights-adjacent bills, whip has held 2/2 historically. Not a guarantee.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-demographic-segments">Demographic segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segments"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-demographic-segments">Demographic segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-demographic-segments">Demographic segments<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>HD03252 impact</th><th>HD03253 impact</th><th>HD03256 impact</th><th>HD03104 impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Urban M-leaning (35–55, high income)</td><td>+</td><td>+ (competence)</td><td>0</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>SD/KD-leaning (rural, 45+)</td><td>++ (law-and-order)</td><td>0</td><td>++ (anti-cheating)</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>S-leaning (working-class, urban)</td><td>– (class-justice concern)</td><td>0 (EU-neutral)</td><td>+ (road safety)</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>V-leaning (young urban, progressive)</td><td>–– (rights concern)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MP-leaning (young urban, environmental)</td><td>–</td><td>0</td><td>+ (fewer manipulated tachographs = climate)</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>C-leaning (rural business owners)</td><td>0</td><td>– (small-bank proportionality)</td><td>+</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>Swing voters (decided in last 2 weeks, 2022)</td><td>+ slight, law-and-order framing</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-segments">Regional segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-segments">Regional segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2314,18 +2314,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-segments">Regional segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Region</th><th>Key interaction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Stockholm county</td><td>HD03253 (banking sector HQ concentration)</td></tr><tr><td>Västra Götaland</td><td>HD03256 (heavy-goods corridors E6/E20)</td></tr><tr><td>Norrland (Norrbotten, Västerbotten)</td><td>HD03252 (per-capita correctional use higher)</td></tr><tr><td>Skåne</td><td>All (mixed urban/rural)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ideological-segments">Ideological segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-segments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ideological-segments">Ideological segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-segments"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Authoritarian-security axis</strong>: strongly pro-<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>, pro-<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Libertarian-rights axis</strong>: opposed to expanded state coercion.</li>
 <li><strong>Pro-EU pragmatists</strong>: neutral on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (alignment positive but late); positive on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> fiscal discipline.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days">Baseline positions on procedural days<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days">Baseline positions on procedural days<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days"></a></h3>
 <p>On a low-drama propositions day (which today is, electorally — high-salience items but procedural not legislative stage), voter movement is <strong>&#x3C;0.3 pp</strong> in any segment. Real movement occurs at committee-report stage and Kammaren vote.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Nordic (Denmark, Finland, Norway) + EU (Germany, Netherlands).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2368,17 +2368,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>CRR3/CRD6 transposition status (April 2026)</th><th>Detainee benefit regime</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>✅ Transposed Jan 2026 (on time)</td><td>Restricted benefits during imprisonment; upkeep obligation</td><td>DK model closer to what <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> now introduces</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>✅ Transposed Feb 2026</td><td>Fängsligt isolerade; social-insurance suspended not fully terminated</td><td>Finland's Art. 8 ECHR jurisprudence informed by KKO cases</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>N/A (not EU)</td><td>Separate framework; limited benefit during custodial sentences</td><td>Historical precedent; comparable outcomes</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>✅ Transposed Jan 2026 (BaFin implementation)</td><td>Differentiated by sentence type; constitutional proportionality bar high</td><td>BVerfG case law central</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>⚠️ Partial transposition (DNB flagged gaps)</td><td>Active reform debate; no full restriction yet</td><td>Sweden + NL both late</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Sweden's CRR3 late transposition</strong> (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>) places it in the NL-led late cohort, not the DK/FI-led on-time cohort. EU Commission pattern suggests reasoned-opinion letters precede infringement procedures by ~90 days — putting Sweden in the Q3 2026 risk window.</li>
 <li><strong>Detainee benefit restriction</strong> (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>) aligns Sweden with DK, which has 5+ years of operational experience. Swedish implementation risk lower because of DK template availability; civil-liberty pushback likely to cite DK proportionality litigation.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-learned-transfer">Lessons-learned transfer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-learned-transfer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-learned-transfer">Lessons-learned transfer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-learned-transfer"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>From DK</strong>: Pre-empt proportionality challenge by embedding carve-outs for dependant-support in regulation (not primary law) — allows faster adjustment.</li>
 <li><strong>From DE</strong>: Bundesverfassungsgericht precedents establish that indefinite preventive detention (säkerhetsförvaring equivalent — <em>Sicherungsverwahrung</em>) requires robust therapeutic element; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> benefit restrictions may face similar scrutiny if not paired with rehabilitative investment.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-comparison">Mermaid comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-comparison">Mermaid comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-comparison"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     SE[🇸🇪 Sweden&#x3C;br/>HD03253 late CRR3&#x3C;br/>HD03252 new restrictions]
     DK[🇩🇰 Denmark&#x3C;br/>On-time CRR3&#x3C;br/>Established detainee regime]
@@ -2392,8 +2392,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-comparison">Mermaid comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style DE fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
     style FI fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968">Parallel 1 — 2014 Basel III transposition (Lag 2014:968)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968">Parallel 1 — 2014 Basel III transposition (Lag 2014:968)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: <strong>0.75</strong>
 <strong>Comparator</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> vs. 2014 Basel III domestic legislation.
 <strong>Similarities</strong>:</p>
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968">Parallel 1 —
 <li>2014 happened at inflation-target floor; 2026 at 2.25% policy rate.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Committee phase in 2014 saw substantive amendments to output-floor phasing. Expect similar in 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156">Parallel 2 — 2006 Fängelsestraff + social-insurance reform (Prop. 2005/06:156)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156">Parallel 2 — 2006 Fängelsestraff + social-insurance reform (Prop. 2005/06:156)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: <strong>0.65</strong>
 <strong>Comparator</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> vs. 2006 benefit-restriction reform for inmates.
 <strong>Similarities</strong>:</p>
@@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506
 <li>2006 did not include a new sentence form (säkerhetsförvaring is novel).</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: 2006 amendments eventually survived with carve-outs for dependant-support. Path of least resistance for 2026 is similar compromise.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform">Parallel 3 — 2019 Körtidsregler (driving-time enforcement reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform">Parallel 3 — 2019 Körtidsregler (driving-time enforcement reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: <strong>0.80</strong>
 <strong>Comparator</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> vs. 2019 driving-time enforcement bill.
 <strong>Similarities</strong>:</p>
@@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform">Para
 <li>2019 did not expand search powers; 2026 does.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: 2019 enforcement took ~18 months to ramp; expect similar for HD03256 post 1 July 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content">No-precedent finding: HD03104 evaluation content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content">No-precedent finding: HD03104 evaluation content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2021–2025 evaluation period overlaps with unprecedented pandemic-era borrowing (2020–2021). No clean pre-2000 parallel exists. <strong>Historical pattern search returns no match.</strong> Treat HD03104 as <em>sui generis</em> for precedent purposes; evaluate on first-principles cost-minimisation-vs-risk metrics.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title Historical parallels timeline
@@ -2442,9 +2442,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content">No-precedent finding
     2026 : Today's bundle
          : HD03252 + HD03253 + HD03256</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill">Delivery-risk register (four lenses per bill)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction">HD03252 — Detainee benefits restriction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill">Delivery-risk register (four lenses per bill)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction">HD03252 — Detainee benefits restriction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2476,7 +2476,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction">HD03252 — Detainee benefits
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Risk level</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>§7 konsekvenser of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> estimates modest savings — not a budget stress point</td></tr><tr><td>IT</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Försäkringskassan must update benefit-eligibility rules engine by 1 Aug 2026 — ~3 months from passage</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>Lagrådet proportionality feedback (Bilaga 5) may force implementing-regulation language changes</td></tr><tr><td>Workforce</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>Kriminalvården + Försäkringskassan case-worker retraining</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package">HD03253 — EU Banking Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package">HD03253 — EU Banking Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package">HD03253 — EU Banking Package<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Risk level</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Regulatory-compliance burden falls on banks, not state</td></tr><tr><td>IT</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>FI supervisory data-ingestion updates for CRR3 disclosures</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Interplay with existing Swedish systemic-risk buffers; Basel III endgame complexity</td></tr><tr><td>Workforce</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>FI hiring plan already in motion from 2023 QIS work</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement">HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement">HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2540,9 +2540,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement">HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Risk level</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>Training Polismyndigheten + bilinspektörer on new search protocols</td></tr><tr><td>IT</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Existing tachograph database sufficient</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Clear EU framework</td></tr><tr><td>Workforce</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Bilinspektör role expansion requires cert program; 1 July 2026 deadline tight</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation">HD03104 — Debt-mgmt evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation">HD03104 — Debt-mgmt evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation"></a></h4>
 <p>Reporting only — no implementation risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-backlog-audit">Backlog audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-backlog-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-backlog-audit">Backlog audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-backlog-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2565,7 +2565,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-backlog-audit">Backlog audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Adjacent pending reform</th><th>Interaction with today's bundle</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pending revision of arbetslöshetsförsäkring</td><td>Administrative overlap with Försäkringskassan IT workload</td></tr><tr><td>FI AI-risk supervisory framework</td><td>CRR3 disclosure co-dependencies</td></tr><tr><td>Transport planning bill 2026</td><td>Tachograph enforcement sync</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map">Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map">Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     HD03252[HD03252] --> IT52[IT: HIGH]
     HD03252 --> REG52[Reg: Med]
@@ -2576,26 +2576,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map">Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map<a
     style REG53 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style WF56 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-working-hypothesis">Working hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-working-hypothesis"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-working-hypothesis">Working hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-working-hypothesis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>H0 (working)</strong>: The 23 April 2026 bundle represents a coherent Tidö "pre-election delivery" strategy combining financial-stability institutionalisation with criminal-justice operationalisation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy">H1: Bundle is artefact, not strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy">H1: Bundle is artefact, not strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 4 bills were ready on 23 April by legal-drafting coincidence, not political choreography.
 <strong>Supporting evidence</strong>: Documents span 4 different ministries (Finansdep. × 2, Justitiedep., Landsbygdsdep.) — unusual coordination cost for intentional bundling.
 <strong>Against</strong>: All 4 signed by PM Kristersson personally on the same day — that IS coordination.
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>LIKELY</strong> for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> (statutory calendar), <strong>UNLIKELY</strong> for HD03252+HD03253 which required cabinet approval alignment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch">H2: EU pressure, not Tidö priorities, drives the batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch">H2: EU pressure, not Tidö priorities, drives the batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> is EU-mandated; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> implements EU Mobility Package. Tidö fingerprint is weaker than public narrative.
 <strong>Supporting evidence</strong>: 2 of 4 documents are EU transpositions. Finance Minister Wykman is the workhorse, not Justice Minister Strömmer.
 <strong>Against</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is purely domestic and carries clearest Tidö signature.
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>PARTIAL SUPPORT</strong> — H2 is correct for 2/4 documents; narrative framing conflates Tidö with EU compliance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny">H3: Pre-election "flooding the zone" to suppress individual scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny">H3: Pre-election "flooding the zone" to suppress individual scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: Releasing 4 bills same day is intentional information-asymmetry tactic.
 <strong>Supporting evidence</strong>: Pattern seen in Tidö comms strategy 2023–2025; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is the most politically sensitive and benefits from dilution.
 <strong>Against</strong>: Lagrådet and FiU/SfU referral processes ensure substantive scrutiny regardless of release timing.
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>PLAUSIBLE</strong> — probability ~30%. Hard to falsify without inside-comms documentation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2651,21 +2651,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">H0 Strategy</th><th align="center">H1 Artefact</th><th align="center">H2 EU-driven</th><th align="center">H3 Zone-flood</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>All 4 signed by PM same day</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">–</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>2 of 4 are EU transpositions</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Hard effective dates pre-election (HD03256, HD03252)</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Different ministries</td><td align="center">–</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet process ongoing</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">–</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Posterior weight</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.40</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.15</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.25</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.20</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Assumption under challenge</strong>: We assume Tidö cohesion holds. What if L backbenchers rebel on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>? — see <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Assumption under challenge</strong>: We assume Swedish banks lobby AGAINST <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>. Counter: some banks may actually prefer strict EU alignment for cross-border competitive parity.</li>
 <li><strong>Assumption under challenge</strong>: We assume <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> is low-salience. Counter: if it reveals fiscal slippage, it becomes a major opposition weapon.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives-logged">Rejected alternatives logged<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives-logged"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternatives-logged">Rejected alternatives logged<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives-logged"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>"The batch is a response to a specific crisis" — rejected: no crisis reported in Riksdag chamber record 21–23 April 2026.</li>
 <li>"HD03252 is constitutionally unsafe and will be struck by HFD" — rejected for now: Lagrådet yttrande exists (Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>) and the proposition proceeded — threshold evidence is against full unconstitutionality.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Per <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2722,13 +2722,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>1. Policy domain</th><th>2. Actor</th><th>3. Geography</th><th>4. Time horizon</th><th align="center">5. Salience</th><th align="center">6. Controversy</th><th>7. Data sensitivity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>Fiscal / debt mgmt</td><td>Finansdepartementet (Wykman)</td><td>National</td><td>Retrospective 2021–25</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Public OSINT</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Criminal justice × social insurance</td><td>Justitiedep. (Strömmer) + Försäkringskassan operational</td><td>National (Swedish prisons)</td><td>Forward (effective 1 Aug 2026)</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong> (Art. 9 GDPR, ECHR Art. 8)</td><td>Public OSINT (but implicates Art. 9 data in implementation)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>Financial regulation / EU</td><td>Finansdep. (Wykman) + FI supervisory</td><td>Supra-national (EU) / national</td><td>Rolling transposition</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td>Public OSINT</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Transport / criminal law</td><td>Landsbygdsdep. (Carlson) + Polisen</td><td>National (heavy-goods corridors)</td><td>Forward (1 Jul 2026)</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td>Public OSINT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>T1 (Immediate action)</strong>: HD03253, HD03252</li>
 <li><strong>T2 (Active monitoring)</strong>: HD03256</li>
 <li><strong>T3 (Contextual)</strong>: HD03104</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retention</strong>: 5 years (analysis artifacts), indefinite (public source URLs).</li>
 <li><strong>Access</strong>: Public (all source documents are official Regeringen/Riksdagen publications).</li>
@@ -2747,21 +2747,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style T2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style T3 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment">Cluster A: Financial stability &#x26; EU alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment">Cluster A: Financial stability &#x26; EU alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> EU bankpaket (primary)</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> Statens skuldförvaltning (context)</li>
 <li>Linkage: Both Finansdepartementet; both position government on macro-financial credibility into 2026 election.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation">Cluster B: Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation">Cluster B: Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Detainee benefit restriction (primary)</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> Tachograph enforcement (adjacent — expands search powers)</li>
 <li>Linkage: Both expand state coercive authority (HD03252 over benefits; HD03256 over search). Both carry 2026 effective dates.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2793,13 +2793,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parent reform</th><th>Today's document</th><th>Next step</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö-avtalet § straff &#x26; brott</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>SfU referral → committee report → Kammaren vote pre-recess</td></tr><tr><td>EU Banking Package CRR3/CRD6 (Brussels 2023)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>FiU referral → hearings → vote before summer recess</td></tr><tr><td>EU Mobility Package II (2020)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>TU referral → vote pre-1 July 2026 deadline</td></tr><tr><td>Budgetlagen §5:6 (quinquennial reporting)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>FiU assesses; report to Kammaren</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-activity patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-activity patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Batch-day publication</strong> — 4 bills same day suggests comms-coordinated release; dilutes per-bill scrutiny (documented pattern on high-agenda days at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>Pre-recess enactment window</strong> — effective dates (1 Jul HD03256, 1 Aug HD03252) require Kammaren votes by mid-June.</li>
 <li><strong>Minister load balancing</strong> — Wykman carries 2 (finance dossier strong); Strömmer 1 (justice high-salience); Carlson 1 (KD visibility on infra).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> (if produced) — source day for 3 of 4 documents (lookback).</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/</code> — check for opposition counter-motions.</li>
@@ -2822,15 +2822,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hi
     style EU fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style BL fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>VITAL audit of this run's methodology.</strong> Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> §ICD 203.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency">Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency">Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>4 primary source documents</strong> retrieved with full text ≥ 100 000 chars each via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code>.</li>
 <li>Every analytical claim in this run is anchored to either a <code>dok_id</code> or a primary-source URL on <code>riksdagen.se</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: No SCB, Riksbanken, IMF, or EU Commission cross-corroboration in this run (single-type workflow scope; reserved for aggregation runs). Flagged.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2858,12 +2858,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Confidence band</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">2</td><td>KJ-1, KJ-2 (<code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2</td><td>KJ-3, KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td>LOW / VERY LOW</td><td align="center">1</td><td>KJ-5 (coalition cohesion)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Balance is appropriate — no false-precision claims; LOW flagged honestly.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-diversity">Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-diversity">Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Single-channel</strong>: All evidence from one MCP server (<code>riksdag-regering</code>). Source Diversity Rule says P0/P1 claims need ≥ 3 independent sources; this run has none at P0/P1 threshold, which is acceptable for a referral-phase analysis. Future runs should enrich with FI, Riksbanken, EU Commission sources.</li>
 <li>Admiralty codes: predominantly <strong>B2</strong> (usually reliable — government official source; probably true — text not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2925,7 +2925,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party mentioned</th><th align="center">Positive frames</th><th align="center">Negative frames</th><th align="center">Neutral</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">4 (delivery)</td><td align="center">1 (late EU)</td><td align="center">5</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">2 (Carlson HD03256)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (reduced footprint, potential rebellion)</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (mandate count)</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">1 (pro-EU on HD03253)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (opposition framing)</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Balance check</strong>: Coverage skews government-side due to bundle authorship (unavoidable for a propositions-only run). Opposition stakeholder modelling is mapped but lacks primary-source statements (opposition hasn't spoken yet — referral phase). <strong>Acceptable</strong>, flagged for aggregation enrichment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 compliance audit (9 standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 compliance audit (9 standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2992,19 +2992,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 compliance audit (9 sta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Standard</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Describes the quality and reliability of underlying sources</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>This §"Source diversity" + per-claim Admiralty codes</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Properly caveats and expresses uncertainties</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Confidence labels on every KJ</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Distinguishes between intelligence and assumptions</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> §"Key Assumptions Check"</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Incorporates alternative analysis</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>devils-advocate.md</code> — 3 competing hypotheses via ACH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Relevance of information to US/SE policy decisions</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code> §"3 Decisions"</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Logical argumentation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Each KJ traced to explicit evidence</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Consistency with prior reports</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>No prior runs for 2026-04-24; cross-session check deferred</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>Accurate judgments of change</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>KJ-1 frames the "implementation-mode" shift</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>Authorship clearly identified</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>James Pether Sörling</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252">Improvement 1 — Parse Lagrådet yttrande (Bilaga 5 of HD03252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252">Improvement 1 — Parse Lagrådet yttrande (Bilaga 5 of HD03252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Current gap</strong>: This run references Lagrådet yttrande existence but did not parse its substance (time-constrained Pass 1). Pass 2 would ideally extract proportionality critique text to raise KJ-3 confidence from MEDIUM to HIGH.</p>
 <p><strong>Action next run</strong>: Script-driven extraction of proposition §"Lagrådet" sections into dedicated artifact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment">Improvement 2 — SCB / Riksbanken cross-source enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment">Improvement 2 — SCB / Riksbanken cross-source enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Current gap</strong>: Single-channel MCP sourcing. Missing SCB baseline on incarcerated-persons population and Riksbanken stance on CRR3.</p>
 <p><strong>Action next run</strong>: Budget 5 minutes for SCB <code>search_tables</code> + <code>query_table</code> on relevant series; include Riksbanken statement if press release is linkable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Opposition reaction monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Opposition reaction monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Current gap</strong>: Analysis written before opposition party-group statements issued. Stakeholder mapping is predictive, not empirical.</p>
 <p><strong>Action next run</strong>: Schedule a follow-up evening-analysis run for 2026-04-25 or 26 to capture reactions; cross-reference with this analysis via <code>cross-run-diff.md</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging">Improvement 4 (bonus) — Tier-upgrade candidate flagging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging">Improvement 4 (bonus) — Tier-upgrade candidate flagging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging"></a></h4>
 <p>Current run scoped as Standard tier due to 28-min MCP idle budget. Budget compression prevented DIW ≥ 3.5 items from getting L2+ Priority treatment they arguably deserve. Next time: explicitly flag L3 candidates for immediate aggregation run rather than deferring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-known-limitations-of-this-run">Known limitations of this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-known-limitations-of-this-run">Known limitations of this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Compressed time budget (~28 min) required scope triage — per-document coverage maintained but each file shorter than ideal.</li>
 <li>Pass 2 depth calibrated to MCP-session survival; any Pass 2 under 5 minutes should be treated as "mitigation pass" rather than true iterative improvement.</li>
@@ -3012,7 +3012,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-known-limitations-of-this-run">Known limitations of this run<a class=
 </ol>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-24 00:28 UTC
 <strong>Workflow</strong>: news-propositions
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24865726626
@@ -3022,7 +3022,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Data sources</strong>: <code>get_propositioner</code>, <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> (riksdag-regering MCP, session 4N6ZRTD5)
 <strong>Window used</strong>: 2026-04-23 00:00–23:59 Europe/Stockholm
 <strong>MCP availability</strong>: <code>riksdag-regering</code> ✅ live (get_sync_status OK at 00:27Z); <code>scb</code>, <code>world-bank</code> not called this run (single-type propositions scope).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents">Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents">Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3074,7 +3074,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents">Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Ministry</th><th>Committee</th><th>Retrieval UTC</th><th>Full text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Utvärdering av statens upplåning och skuldförvaltning 2021–2025</td><td>Skrivelse (Written Communication)</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>FiU (Finansutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>En begränsning av rätten till socialförsäkringsförmåner för den som avtjänar fängelsestraff, vistas i kontrollerat boende eller är underkastad säkerhetsförvaring</td><td>Proposition (Government Bill)</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>EU:s bankpaket</td><td>Proposition (Government Bill)</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>FiU (Finansutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Kraftfullare åtgärder mot manipulation och allvarligt missbruk av färdskrivare</td><td>Proposition (Government Bill)</td><td>Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdepartementet</td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage">Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage">Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 30 downloaded, 4 date-matched, 26 excluded (non-matching dates in the MCP window).</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 (out of scope — <code>--doc-type propositions</code>)</li>
@@ -3082,15 +3082,45 @@ <h2 id="rm-coverage">Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><strong>votes</strong>: 0 (not in scope — no vote rounds matched for these document IDs yet; referral phase)</li>
 <li><strong>speeches / questions / interpellations</strong>: 0 (out of scope)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data-quality notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data-quality notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Lookback fallback active</strong> — 0 docs published under 2026-04-24; falling back to 2026-04-23 retrieved 4 bills signed by PM Kristersson on 2026-04-23. Normal Swedish government pattern (Thursday release, Friday indexing).</li>
 <li><strong>Full text</strong>: All 4 documents have <code>fullContent</code> ≥ 100 000 chars via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> — none flagged <code>metadata-only</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Tachograph document (HD03256)</strong> cross-references transport-law enforcement discussions but no vote record yet — committee referral (TU) expected within 14 days.</li>
 <li><strong>No SCB/IMF calls</strong> this run — fiscal context sourced from MCP document text only. Economic enrichment deferred to evening-analysis or weekly-review workflows.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-4">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-4">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-4"></a></h3>
 <p>All <code>dok_id</code> are resolvable at <code>https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html</code> (verified pattern). No private or leaked data.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03104-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03256-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3143,7 +3173,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:12.812Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:34.385Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html b/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html
index 1b1b61aab7..70c81cbbfa 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Propositions ( batch)">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.956Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.540Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T11:10:12.956Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.540Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-24T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Propositions ( batch)","description":"On 23 April 2026 the Kristersson government (Tidö coalition — M, KD, L + SD confidence partner) tabled 4 parliamentary documents dominated by two strategic priorities: (1) EU-driven financial…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T11:10:12.956Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03104-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03104.json","name":"documents/hd03104.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03252.json","name":"documents/hd03252.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03253.json","name":"documents/hd03253.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03256-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03256.json","name":"documents/hd03256.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Propositions ( batch)","description":"On 23 April 2026 the Kristersson government (Tidö coalition — M, KD, L + SD confidence partner) tabled 4 parliamentary documents dominated by two strategic priorities: (1) EU-driven financial…","datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:34.540Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-24-propositions-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03104-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03104.json","name":"documents/hd03104.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03252-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03252.json","name":"documents/hd03252.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03253-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03253.json","name":"documents/hd03253.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03256-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/hd03256.json","name":"documents/hd03256.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>On 23 April 2026 the Kristersson government (Tidö coalition — M, KD, L + SD confidence partner) tabled <strong>4 parliamentary documents</strong> dominated by two strategic priorities: (1) <strong>EU-driven financial regulation</strong> with Prop. 2025/26:253 (EU Banking Package, CRR3/CRD6 transposition — Admiralty B2) and (2) <strong>Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation</strong> with Prop. 2025/26:252 (benefit restrictions for detainees). A debt-management evaluation skrivelse (Skr. 2025/26:104) and a tachograph-enforcement bill (Prop. 2025/26:256) complete the batch. The highest-weight item (Prop. 2025/26:253, DIW <strong>3.8</strong>) is systemic — it reshapes capital requirements for Sweden's four systemically-important banks ahead of Riksbanken's next rate decision.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     A[📜 4 Propositions&#x3C;br/>23 April 2026] --> B[Financial Regulation Track]
@@ -233,13 +233,13 @@ <h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
     style B2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#e0e0e0
     style C1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0
     style C2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Financial-markets desk</strong>: Brief clients on Prop. 2025/26:253 capital-floor impact for Handelsbanken/SEB IRB books ahead of Q2 earnings. <strong>Trigger</strong>: Riksbanken MPC comment at next meeting. Confidence: <strong>HIGH</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>Civil-society / legal</strong>: Prepare Advokatsamfundet remiss challenge to Prop. 2025/26:252 proportionality (Art. 9 GDPR special-category data in benefits assessment; ECHR Art. 8 privacy). <strong>Trigger</strong>: SfU committee referral opens. Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>.</li>
 <li><strong>Political-risk desk</strong>: Monitor V/S/MP pushback framing on Prop. 2025/26:252 as "punishment of poverty" — potential coalition-cohesion test for Tidö parties (L historically more reluctant on punitive social-policy). Confidence: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Most significant</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:253 — EU bankpaket (DIW 3.8, Admiralty B2). Transposes CRR3/CRD6; raises RWA floors for big-4 Swedish banks.</li>
 <li><strong>Most controversial</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:252 — benefit restrictions for detainees (DIW 3.5). Civil-liberty flashpoint.</li>
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-second read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li><strong>Most symbolic</strong>: Skr. 2025/26:104 — 5-year debt-management evaluation; fiscal-credibility signal into 2026 election cycle.</li>
 <li><strong>Common thread</strong>: All 4 signed by PM Kristersson; 2 by Finance Minister Wykman → Finansdepartementet carries 50% of the day's legislative load.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h">Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h">Top forward trigger (72 h)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-72-h"></a></h3>
 <p>🔴 <strong>SfU committee referral for Prop. 2025/26:252</strong> — if opposition (V, S, MP) coordinate on proportionality objections, this becomes the first Tidö criminal-justice bill to face unified opposition legal challenge in 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decisions-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-decisions-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-decisions-matrix">Key decisions matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision</th><th>Trigger</th><th>Horizon</th><th>Confidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Flag banking-sector capital impact</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:253 FiU hearing</td><td>2–4 weeks</td><td>HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>Remiss challenge preparation</td><td>Prop. 2025/26:252 SfU referral</td><td>1 week</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition-cohesion monitoring</td><td>L/KD divergence signal</td><td>4–8 weeks</td><td>MEDIUM</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-summary"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Tier 1 (systemic)</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:253 transposition delay → EU infringement exposure.</li>
 <li><strong>Tier 2 (political)</strong>: Prop. 2025/26:252 — ECHR/ECtHR-based rights challenge possible.</li>
@@ -289,12 +289,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-summary">Risk summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 <p><strong>Evidence base</strong>: 4 primary-source documents (Riksdagen API) + fiscal-framework context. Single-source dependency flagged in <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md">methodology-reflection.md</a>.</p>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The Kristersson government's 23 April 2026 proposition bundle combines <strong>EU-mandated financial regulation</strong> (HD03253 — EU Banking Package) with <strong>Tidö-era criminal-justice operationalisation</strong> (HD03252 — detainee benefit restrictions), positioning both for summer-session enactment. The package signals a government pivoting from "new laws" to "implementation mode" roughly 16 months before the September 2026 Riksdag election.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -357,24 +357,24 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking">DIW-weighted ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style R4 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style FIN fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style CJ fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Thematic convergence</strong>: Two propositions (HD03252, HD03256) expand <strong>state coercive authority</strong> (benefit restriction, search powers); two (HD03253, HD03104) <strong>institutionalise financial governance</strong>. This is the profile of a government preparing its <strong>election legacy</strong>: "We delivered financial stability + public order." Whether the Riksdag will enact all four before the summer recess (late June) depends on FiU and SfU committee bandwidth.</p>
 <p><strong>Implementation cluster</strong>: HD03252 (1 Aug 2026) and HD03256 (1 Jul 2026) carry hard effective dates — the government is front-loading <strong>visible enforcement</strong> before the election. HD03253 follows the EU timeline and cannot be politically rushed.</p>
 <p><strong>Coalition load-bearing</strong>: All 4 documents signed by PM Kristersson. Ministerial diversity: Wykman (M, finance ×2), Strömmer (M, justice), Carlson (KD, infra). L gets no lead ministry role in today's batch — <strong>consistent with L's reduced legislative footprint since the 2024–25 coalition strain over criminal-justice proportionality</strong>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata">AI-recommended article metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ai-recommended-article-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>EN headline (72 chars)</strong>: "Kristersson's pivot: EU bank rules, detainee benefits, truck-fraud law"</li>
 <li><strong>SV headline (75 chars)</strong>: "Kristerssons växel: EU-bankregler, häktesförmåner och färdskrivarlag"</li>
 <li><strong>EN meta description (158 chars)</strong>: "Four government bills signed 23 April 2026 reshape Sweden's banking capital rules, restrict detainee benefits, target tachograph fraud, and evaluate debt mgmt."</li>
 <li><strong>Primary keywords</strong>: EU banking package, Basel III endgame, säkerhetsförvaring, kontrollerat boende, färdskrivare, Tidö-avtalet, Niklas Wykman, Ulf Kristersson.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals">Cross-type signals<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>With motions pipeline</strong>: Opposition motions on HD03252 expected within 15-day deadline (by ~8 May 2026).</li>
 <li><strong>With committee-reports pipeline</strong>: FiU will need to report HD03253 ahead of summer recess (~20 June).</li>
 <li><strong>With interpellations</strong>: V/S likely to file on HD03252 proportionality; KD to support HD03256.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence--uncertainty"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HIGH</strong>: Document identity, authors, effective dates (A1 primary-source).</li>
 <li><strong>MEDIUM</strong>: Enactment probability (depends on party whip behaviour — see <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code>).</li>
@@ -382,32 +382,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence--uncertainty">Confidence &#x26; uncertainty<a class="" ari
 </ul>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Audience</strong>: Decision-makers in financial markets, political risk, civil society.
 <strong>Classification</strong>: Public OSINT.
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence">Key Judgment 1 (KJ-1) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1-kj-1--high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: The Kristersson government has transitioned from "new policy" to "implementation mode" 16 months ahead of the September 2026 Riksdag election, as evidenced by 2 bills in today's batch carrying hard pre-election effective dates.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> effective 1 August 2026; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> effective 1 July 2026; no new programmatic announcements today.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong> (multiple corroborating documents; Admiralty B2).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 (KJ-2) — HIGH confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2-kj-2--high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (EU Banking Package transposition) is the single most consequential document in today's batch for Sweden's financial sector, reshaping capital requirements for the 4 systemically-important banks (Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Proposition explicitly cites CRR3/CRD6 directives; Finansdepartementet-led with FI operational role; DIW 3.8 (highest in batch).</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 3 (KJ-3) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3-kj-3--medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is the politically highest-risk document of the batch. Probability of material amendment during committee stage is <strong>~25%</strong> (P2 scenario — see <code>scenario-analysis.md</code>).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande already issued (Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>); historical proportionality sensitivity in Swedish social-insurance law.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (single-source dependency on document text; opposition positioning not yet public).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence">Key Judgment 4 (KJ-4) — MEDIUM confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4-kj-4--medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: Sweden faces an EU Commission infringement-risk window of ~90 days on late CRR3 transposition (scenario S3, probability 20%).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: CRR3 transposition deadline January 2026; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> tabled only 23 April 2026.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5) — LOW confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence">Key Judgment 5 (KJ-5) — LOW confidence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5-kj-5--low-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Judgment</strong>: Coalition cohesion will hold on all 4 votes, including <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence</strong>: L has historically pushed back on punitive social-policy but has not publicly broken with Tidö on HD03252-adjacent bills 2023–25.</p>
 <p><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>LOW</strong> — single precedent class, future behaviour contingent on whip calibration. See <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) for next cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: FiU committee referral decisions on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> — publication of hearing list (expected within 2 weeks).</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: SfU committee referral + remiss summary on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> — flag any dissenting remissinstans position from Advokatsamfundet, Barnombudsmannen, or JO.</li>
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pirs-for-next-cycle">Priority Inte
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande text — deep-read for proportionality specifics on HD03252.</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong>: Försäkringskassan IT readiness statement for 1 Aug 2026 cut-over.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -449,16 +449,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Evidence base</th><th>If wrong, then …</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö coalition holds</td><td>2023–25 voting record</td><td>HD03252 fails or is amended</td></tr><tr><td>EU Commission follows normal 90-day procedure</td><td>Historical infringement-procedure pattern</td><td>Earlier/harder action on HD03253</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet critique is mild</td><td>Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> (not yet parsed)</td><td>Scenario S2 probability rises</td></tr><tr><td>Försäkringskassan can deliver IT in 3 months</td><td>§7 konsekvenser of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Effective date slips</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-gaps">Intelligence gaps<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-gaps"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>No SCB data on current incarcerated-persons benefits baseline (would improve KJ-3 confidence).</li>
 <li>No Riksbanken statement on CRR3 interaction with monetary policy.</li>
 <li>No internal party-group position statements yet.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: Decision-Informational-Weighting (DIW) per <code>ai-driven-analysis-guide.md</code> §DIW. Scores on 0–5 scale.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-table-ranked">Scoring table (ranked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-table-ranked"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-table-ranked">Scoring table (ranked)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-table-ranked"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -525,18 +525,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-table-ranked">Scoring table (ranked)<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style R2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style R3 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style R4 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If <strong>HD03253's</strong> RWA-floor impact turns out bigger than QIS (> 8% CET1 hit on Handelsbanken), score rises to <strong>4.3</strong> (L3 Intelligence-grade). <strong>Trigger indicator</strong>: Finansinspektionen QIS publication, expected Q3 2026.</li>
 <li>If <strong>HD03252</strong> triggers Lagrådet second opinion on proportionality, score rises to <strong>4.0</strong>. <strong>Trigger</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande already exists per Bilaga 5 of the proposition — scope for Pass-2 deep-read (HD03252 text page ~49).</li>
 <li>If <strong>HD03256</strong> enforcement provokes union response (Transportarbetareförbundet), political salience multiplies.</li>
 <li>If <strong>HD03104</strong> evaluation attracts IMF Article IV citation, external-credibility weight rises.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-anti-fabrication-check">Anti-fabrication check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-fabrication-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-anti-fabrication-check">Anti-fabrication check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-fabrication-check"></a></h3>
 <p>Every ranked item cites its <code>dok_id</code> and resolvable URL on riksdagen.se. No claim in this table is unevidenced. Sources diversity is <strong>single-channel</strong> (Riksdagen API only) — flagged for Pass-2 enrichment with SCB / Riksbanken / Finansinspektionen statements in a later aggregation run.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predicted">Per-party framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predicted"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-per-party-framing-predicted">Per-party framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-party-framing-predicted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-per-party-framing-predicted">Per-party framing (predicted)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>HD03252 frame</th><th>HD03253 frame</th><th>HD03256 frame</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>"Fairness: criminals shouldn't live at taxpayers' expense"</td><td>"Sweden delivers on EU financial stability"</td><td>"Protecting honest hauliers"</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>"Law and order — consequences matter"</td><td>neutral-positive</td><td>"Road safety for families"</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>Cautious support; emphasises safeguards</td><td>Pro-EU</td><td>Neutral</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Strong endorsement; ties to migration-crime narrative</td><td>neutral</td><td>Strong endorsement</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Silent or measured critique (triangulate)</td><td>Tactical support ("we negotiated the EU framework")</td><td>Measured support</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>"Punishing poverty behind bars — class justice"</td><td>neutral</td><td>"Police powers expand — why?"</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>"Rights erosion — where is proportionality?"</td><td>neutral</td><td>"Good intent, but oversight?"</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Split — business-friendly on HD03256; cautious on HD03252</td><td>Small-bank proportionality concerns</td><td>Support</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted">Press-quadrant framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted">Press-quadrant framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -624,20 +624,20 @@ <h2 id="rm-press-quadrant-framing-predicted">Press-quadrant framing (predicted)<
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Quadrant</th><th>Expected frame on HD03252</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Right-of-centre (SvD, Expressen ledarsida)</td><td>Supportive — "common sense"</td></tr><tr><td>Centre-right (DN ledarsida)</td><td>Conditional support — "proportionality must be verified"</td></tr><tr><td>Centre-left (Aftonbladet ledarsida)</td><td>Critical — "justice, not punishment"</td></tr><tr><td>Left-of-centre (ETC, Flamman)</td><td>Strongly critical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-platform-framing-predicted">Platform framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-platform-framing-predicted"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-platform-framing-predicted">Platform framing (predicted)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-platform-framing-predicted"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>X / Twitter Sweden</strong>: Polarised — M/KD/SD supporters amplify "fair consequence"; V/MP amplify "rights erosion". <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> gets low engagement (technical).</li>
 <li><strong>TV4 / SVT news</strong>: Framing as bundle — expect 2-minute explainer on all four bills (high production), 15-minute Agenda segment on HD03252 alone.</li>
 <li><strong>Podcasts (Aftonbladet Ledaren, DN Åsikt)</strong>: HD03252 deep-dive likely within 7 days.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry">Longitudinal frame record entry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry">Longitudinal frame record entry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-frame-record-entry"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-24. <strong>Bundle</strong>: HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104. <strong>Dominant elite frame</strong>: "government delivers on Tidö-avtalet". <strong>Dominant critical frame</strong>: "proportionality question on HD03252". <strong>Next inflection point</strong>: SfU committee hearing schedule publication.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference">Cross-reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference"></a></h3>
 <p>All framings are predictive, based on 2023–2025 editorial pattern observation. Empirical confirmation awaits Day+1 to Day+7 media capture — recommended follow-up in <code>evening-analysis</code> or <code>weekly-review</code> workflow.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Per <code>analysis/templates/stakeholder-impact.md</code> — lenses: Government, Opposition, Institutions, Affected citizens, Economic actors, International.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-matrix">Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th>Actor</th><th>Position on bundle</th><th>Key document</th><th>Leverage</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Government</td><td>PM Ulf Kristersson (M)</td><td>Signatory on all 4; owns whole bundle</td><td>All</td><td>Executive authority</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>Finance Min. Niklas Wykman (M)</td><td>Leads HD03253, HD03104</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Finansdep. portfolio</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>Justice Min. Gunnar Strömmer (M)</td><td>Leads HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Justitiedep. portfolio</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>Infra Min. Andreas Carlson (KD)</td><td>Leads HD03256 — only KD-led bill today</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Landsbygdsdep.</td></tr><tr><td>Government</td><td>SD parliamentary group</td><td>Confidence-support on all 4 (Tidö-avtalet)</td><td>All</td><td>73 mandates pivotal</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Magdalena Andersson (S)</td><td>Expected tactical support on HD03253 (pro-EU); opposed on HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>, <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>107 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Nooshi Dadgostar (V)</td><td>Strongly opposed to HD03252 (class-justice framing)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>24 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Märta Stenevi / Daniel Helldén (MP)</td><td>Opposed to HD03252; conditional on HD03256</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>18 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition</td><td>Muharrem Demirok (C)</td><td>Likely split — business-friendly on HD03256, cautious on HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>24 mandates</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Lagrådet</td><td>Has issued yttrande on HD03252 (Bilaga 5)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Constitutional review</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Riksgälden</td><td>Subject of HD03104 evaluation</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Debt-management execution</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Finansinspektionen</td><td>Gains supervisory toolkit under HD03253</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Prudential authority</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Försäkringskassan</td><td>Operational burden under HD03252</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Benefit administration</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Polismyndigheten</td><td>New search powers under HD03256</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Enforcement</td></tr><tr><td>Institutions</td><td>Kriminalvården</td><td>Administers säkerhetsförvaring + kontrollerat boende</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Prison system</td></tr><tr><td>Affected</td><td>Incarcerated persons + families</td><td>Loss of benefits, obligation to pay upkeep</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Limited voice; via Advokatsamfundet</td></tr><tr><td>Affected</td><td>Truck drivers / transport workers</td><td>Subject to new search powers</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Transportarbetareförbundet</td></tr><tr><td>Economic</td><td>Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea</td><td>CRR3 capital impact (IRB users most affected)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>~SEK 6 trn combined balance sheet</td></tr><tr><td>Economic</td><td>Sparbanker</td><td>Proportionality concerns</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Rural financial services</td></tr><tr><td>Economic</td><td>Transportföretagen</td><td>Supports HD03256 (anti-cheating)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Industry lobby</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>EU Commission</td><td>Expects prompt CRR3 transposition</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Infringement procedure</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>IMF Article IV</td><td>Will reference HD03104 evaluation</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>External credibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     PM[Ulf Kristersson PM] --> FM[Niklas Wykman FinMin]
     PM --> JM[Gunnar Strömmer JusMin]
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-influence-network">Influence network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     style FM fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style JM fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style IM fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-winners--losers-summary">Winners / losers summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-winners--losers-summary">Winners / losers summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-winners--losers-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -859,28 +859,28 @@ <h2 id="rm-winners--losers-summary">Winners / losers summary<a class="" aria-hid
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th>Winners</th><th>Losers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>FI, depositors, EU alignment</td><td>Big-4 banks (IRB users); Sparbanker</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Tidö parties narrative; Kriminalvården rules clarity</td><td>Incarcerated + dependants; possibly L reputation</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Legitimate hauliers; Polismyndigheten</td><td>Rogue operators; civil-liberty advocates</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>Finansdep. narrative; Riksgälden validation</td><td>Opposition critique bandwidth</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Horizons</strong>: 72 h / 1 week / 1 month / Election (Sep 2026).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27">72-hour window (by 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27">72-hour window (by 2026-04-27)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-window-by-2026-04-27"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>2026-04-24 to 2026-04-27</strong> — Opposition party-group first statements on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> (V, MP, S coordination signal).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-04-25</strong> — Swedish financial press (DI, Affärsvärlden) commentary on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> RWA impact.</li>
 <li><strong>+72h</strong> — SvD and DN ledarsida editorials on bundle.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01">1-week window (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01">1-week window (by 2026-05-01)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-week-window-by-2026-05-01"></a></h3>
 <ol start="4">
 <li><strong>2026-04-28 to 2026-05-01</strong> — Committee referral decisions (FiU for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>, SfU for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>, TU for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-01</strong> — Advokatsamfundet position statement on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> proportionality.</li>
 <li><strong>+1 week</strong> — Bankföreningen public comment on CRR3 output-floor (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24">1-month window (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24">1-month window (by 2026-05-24)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-month-window-by-2026-05-24"></a></h3>
 <ol start="7">
 <li><strong>2026-05-08</strong> — Opposition motion-filing deadline (15 days) on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-15</strong> — First FiU hearing on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (typical timetable).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-24</strong> — Finansinspektionen QIS snapshot for CRR3.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-05-30</strong> — Försäkringskassan IT readiness statement for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> 1 Aug cut-over.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day">Election window (by 2026-09-13, election day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day">Election window (by 2026-09-13, election day)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day"></a></h3>
 <ol start="11">
 <li><strong>2026-06-15</strong> — Kammaren vote on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (pre-recess target).</li>
 <li><strong>2026-06-20</strong> — Kammaren vote on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> (or deferred post-recess if Scenario S2).</li>
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-window-by-2026-09-13-election-day">Election window (by 2026-
 <li><strong>2026-08-01</strong> — <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> effective date — election-year operational reality.</li>
 <li><strong>2026-09-13</strong> — Riksdag election — retrospective scorecard on bundle delivery.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard">Indicator scoring dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard">Indicator scoring dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title Forward indicator horizon
     section 72h
@@ -903,21 +903,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-scoring-dashboard">Indicator scoring dashboard<a class="" a
         2026-07-01 : HD03256 effective
         2026-08-01 : HD03252 effective
         2026-09-13 : Election day</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-anti-vagueness-check">Anti-vagueness check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-vagueness-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-anti-vagueness-check">Anti-vagueness check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-anti-vagueness-check"></a></h3>
 <p>All 15 indicators have an explicit date, source anchor, and evidenced mechanism. Admiralty codes B2-C3 depending on whether the indicator is scheduled (deterministic) vs. behavioural (probabilistic).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Horizon</strong>: Riksdag summer recess (June 2026) → September 2026 election → first post-election cycle.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45">Scenario 1 — "Clean enactment" (probability 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45">Scenario 1 — "Clean enactment" (probability 45%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-1--clean-enactment-probability-45"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: All 4 bills enacted on schedule. HD03256 effective 1 July, HD03252 effective 1 August, HD03253 in force per EU timetable, HD03104 noted. Tidö framing succeeds: "law and order + sound money."</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: FiU committee report on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> published without amendments by mid-June 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25">Scenario 2 — "Lagrådet-forced redraft of HD03252" (probability 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25">Scenario 2 — "Lagrådet-forced redraft of HD03252" (probability 25%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-2--lagrådet-forced-redraft-of-hd03252-probability-25"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: Lagrådet yttrande critique on proportionality (visible in Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>) prompts SfU to amend. Effective date slips to 1 Oct 2026 — post-election. Electoral "delivered" message weakens.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: SfU schedules ≥ 2 hearings with rights-focused remissinstanser in May 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20">Scenario 3 — "EU infringement squeeze on HD03253" (probability 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20">Scenario 3 — "EU infringement squeeze on HD03253" (probability 20%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-3--eu-infringement-squeeze-on-hd03253-probability-20"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: EU Commission issues reasoned opinion on late CRR3 transposition before Swedish enactment. Government accelerates FiU timetable. Industry consultation short-circuited → harsher-than-necessary output-floor calibration for Handelsbanken/SEB.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: DG FISMA communication to Stockholm in May; press leak to Financial Times.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10">Scenario 4 — "Bundle dilution success" (probability 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10">Scenario 4 — "Bundle dilution success" (probability 10%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Narrative</strong>: 4-bill bundle strategy works: media attention fragmented; opposition coordination fails. All enacted without significant amendment.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicator</strong>: Major dailies (DN, SvD, Aftonbladet) devote &#x3C; 500 words combined to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> in first 72 h.</p>
 <p><strong>Total: 100%</strong></p>
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-4--bundle-dilution-success-probability-10">Scenario 4 — "B
     "S2 Lagrådet redraft" : 25
     "S3 EU infringement squeeze" : 20
     "S4 Bundle dilution" : 10</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators">Scenario-specific forward indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators">Scenario-specific forward indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -964,9 +964,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-specific-forward-indicators">Scenario-specific forward indic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>72-h indicator</th><th>1-week indicator</th><th>1-month indicator</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S1</td><td>No opposition joint motion filed</td><td>FiU hearing calendar published</td><td>Committee report drafted</td></tr><tr><td>S2</td><td>Lagrådet media commentary</td><td>≥ 3 rights-focused op-eds</td><td>SfU amendment proposal</td></tr><tr><td>S3</td><td>EU Commission statement</td><td>Bankföreningen public position</td><td>Revised FiU timetable</td></tr><tr><td>S4</td><td>&#x3C; 500 words press coverage</td><td>Opposition fragmented on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>All 4 in summer recess schedule</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Framework</strong>: per <code>analysis/methodologies/political-risk-methodology.md</code> — dimensions: Political, Institutional, Economic, Social/Rights, Operational.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th align="center">L (1–5)</th><th align="center">I (1–5)</th><th align="center">Score</th><th>dok_id anchor</th><th>Mitigation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R1</td><td>Economic</td><td>Output-floor adoption causes procyclical credit contraction at Handelsbanken/SEB</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Phased transition, FI/Riksbanken coordination</td></tr><tr><td>R2</td><td>Social/Rights</td><td>Benefit restriction disproportionately impacts detainees with dependants → ECHR Art. 8</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">12</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Lagrådet review; proportionality clause in beredning</td></tr><tr><td>R3</td><td>Political</td><td>Opposition (V/S/MP) unified motion against HD03252 during committee stage</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>M/KD/L/SD whip discipline</td></tr><tr><td>R4</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Polismyndigheten/Transportstyrelsen lacks capacity to operationalise search powers</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Budget allocation in höstbudget; training ramp</td></tr><tr><td>R5</td><td>Economic</td><td>Late CRR3 transposition → EU Commission infringement procedure</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">8</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>Accelerated FiU timetable</td></tr><tr><td>R6</td><td>Political</td><td>HD03252 becomes 2026 election attack vector against Tidö</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>Messaging discipline; frame as "fair responsibility"</td></tr><tr><td>R7</td><td>Operational</td><td>Försäkringskassan IT changes to implement benefit-restriction logic by 1 Aug 2026</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">12</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>§7 konsekvenser in proposition — implementation timeline flagged</td></tr><tr><td>R8</td><td>Institutional</td><td>Lagrådet's existing yttrande on HD03252 contains proportionality critique not yet fully addressed</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">9</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 5</td><td>SfU redrafts during committee</td></tr><tr><td>R9</td><td>Economic</td><td>Debt-management evaluation (HD03104) exposes opposition attack lines on pandemic-era borrowing</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Government narrative preparation</td></tr><tr><td>R10</td><td>Social/Rights</td><td>Expanded search powers (HD03256) criticised by Advokatsamfundet</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">4</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Proportionality safeguards in §5.2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-l--i"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
     title Risk heat map (L × I)
     x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -1102,12 +1102,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map-l--i">Heat map (L × I)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
     "R8 Lagrådet gap": [0.55, 0.55]
     "R9 Debt eval attack": [0.35, 0.35]
     "R10 Search-power critique": [0.35, 0.35]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cascading-chains">Cascading chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cascading-chains"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>R7 → R2 → R3 → R6</strong>: Försäkringskassan IT slippage delays <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> implementation, opening the door for rights-based critique, enabling opposition motion, escalating to 2026 election attack.</li>
 <li><strong>R5 → R1</strong>: Late CRR3 transposition → accelerated FiU timetable → insufficient industry consultation → harsher-than-necessary capital impact on Swedish banks.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-bayesian-posterior-notes">Bayesian posterior notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-posterior-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bayesian-posterior-notes">Bayesian posterior notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bayesian-posterior-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Prior (P(Tidö delivers HD03252 on schedule))</strong>: 0.7 (based on Tidö's 2023–25 legislative track record).</li>
 <li><strong>Posterior given Lagrådet yttrande exists but with proportionality comments</strong>: 0.55 — reduced by the signal that legal review flagged issues.</li>
@@ -1115,9 +1115,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-bayesian-posterior-notes">Bayesian posterior notes<a class="" aria-hi
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Sources</strong>: All risks anchored to document text at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">riksdagen.se</a> and <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a>. Admiralty code B2 (usually reliable source, probably true — government proposition text).</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Unit of analysis</strong>: The Kristersson government's 23 April 2026 proposition bundle as a whole (HD03253, HD03252, HD03256, HD03104).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">S1</td><td>Technocratic preparedness — EU transposition delivered via standard CRR3/CRD6 machinery.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> "EU:s kapitaltäckningsdirektiv" motivation text; Finansinspektionen remiss.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S2</td><td>Tidö coalition remains operationally cohesive — all 4 signed by PM Kristersson with M/KD ministers delivering on programme.</td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03104 (M ministers); <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> (KD Carlson).</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S3</td><td>Deliverable record before September 2026 election — hard effective dates (1 Jul, 1 Aug 2026).</td><td>Explicit in <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> "träda i kraft den 1 augusti 2026"; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> "1 juli 2026".</td></tr><tr><td align="center">S4</td><td>Reporting discipline — debt-management evaluation per Budgetlagen submitted on cycle.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> submitted to Riksdagen on statutory quinquennial schedule.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">W1</td><td>Late transposition of EU banking package — Sweden behind CRR3 deadline.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> ärendet-och-dess-beredning section; EU transposition deadline was January 2026.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W2</td><td>Proportionality exposure on detainee benefits — civil-liberty backlash risk.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 5 Lagrådets yttrande; implicates regeringsformen 2 kap. 12 § and ECHR Art. 8.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W3</td><td>Enforcement-capacity gap — tachograph law requires new investigative capability at Polismyndigheten and bilinspektörer.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> §5 on new powers; implicit resource question.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">W4</td><td>Narrow messaging bandwidth — 4 bills on same day dilute press coverage.</td><td>Pattern observation across <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">riksdagen.se</a> batch-publication days.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">O1</td><td>Financial-stability credential: Sweden aligns with EU Banking Union standard.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> transposes CRR3/CRD6 verbatim.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O2</td><td>Tidö signature reform on criminal justice operational before election.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> effective 1 Aug 2026 — ~5 weeks before election day.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O3</td><td>Business-community goodwill: tachograph crackdown protects legitimate hauliers.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> supports Transportföretagen competitive fairness.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">O4</td><td>Frame 2021–2025 debt management as success story.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> skrivelse lets government set the narrative.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">T1</td><td>Opposition coordination on HD03252 proportionality — V/S/MP joint motion possible.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 3 remissinstanserna includes civil-society bodies likely to object.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T2</td><td>Bank-sector pushback on CRR3 output floor — political lobbying during FiU referral.</td><td>Historical pattern on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>-class transposition bills; Swedish banks have active public-affairs presence.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T3</td><td>Opportunity-cost narrative — "government pushing 4 bills while neglecting X".</td><td>Opposition framing risk; no concrete evidence yet on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a>.</td></tr><tr><td align="center">T4</td><td>Lagrådet critique on HD03252 could force redraft during committee stage.</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Bilaga 5 Lagrådets yttrande already issued — depth of critique to be assessed in Pass 2.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies">TOWS matrix (integrated strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies">TOWS matrix (integrated strategies)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1267,12 +1267,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix-integrated-strategies">TOWS matrix (integrated strategies
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Combine S1 technocratic credibility with O1 EU alignment → position Kristersson as "competent EU player" into election. Evidence: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>.</td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Use S2 cohesion to suppress T1 coordination — whip discipline on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> vote.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Address W1 late transposition by invoking O1 completion narrative. Evidence: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>.</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: If W2 proportionality challenge + T4 Lagrådet line up, government must redraft — monitor <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> committee timetable.</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot">Cross-SWOT<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot"></a></h3>
 <p>The dominant pattern is <strong>"competence vs. rights"</strong> — the government's execution strengths (S1, S2) are challenged by proportionality threats (W2, T4) on HD03252. <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> is structurally safer (EU-mandated, technical); <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is where political risk concentrates.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Overall Threat Level</strong>: HIGH · <strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH (TH1, TH2, TH4) / MEDIUM (TH3, TH5) · <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A2 — primary-source proposition texts HD03252/HD03253/HD03256, FiU referral phase observable).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Threat taxonomy mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Threat taxonomy mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-taxonomy-mapping">Threat taxonomy mapping<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Threat category</th><th>Specific threat</th><th>Actor</th><th>Target</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TH1</td><td>Regulatory capture</td><td>Big-4 banks lobby FiU committee to dilute CRR3 output floor</td><td>Handelsbanken, SEB, Swedbank, Nordea via Svenska Bankföreningen</td><td>Parliamentary committee</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> referral phase</td></tr><tr><td>TH2</td><td>Rights erosion</td><td>Benefit restrictions + säkerhetsförvaring combine to create indefinite-detention-with-reduced-entitlements cohort</td><td>Government (policy intent)</td><td>Incarcerated persons + dependants</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> §4–5</td></tr><tr><td>TH3</td><td>Mission creep</td><td>Search powers for bilinspektörer (civilian inspectors) normalise warrantless search in transport sector</td><td>Polismyndigheten + Transportstyrelsen</td><td>Transport workers</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> §5.2</td></tr><tr><td>TH4</td><td>Information asymmetry</td><td>4-bill bundle on same day suppresses individual scrutiny of HD03252</td><td>Government comms</td><td>Media / opposition oversight</td><td>Pattern observation 23 April 2026</td></tr><tr><td>TH5</td><td>Coalition instability</td><td>L party (historically more liberal on criminal justice) may rebel on HD03252</td><td>L parliamentary group</td><td>Tidö cohesion</td><td>See <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path">Attack tree — HD03252 rights-erosion path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path">Attack tree — HD03252 rights-erosion path<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
     GOAL[Rights erosion for&#x3C;br/>incarcerated cohort] --> M1[Direct: benefit restriction]
     GOAL --> M2[Indirect: reduced legal aid access]
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree--hd03252-rights-erosion-path">Attack tree — HD03252 rig
     S3 --> E1
     style GOAL fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style E1 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture">Kill-chain-style mapping (TH1 regulatory capture)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture">Kill-chain-style mapping (TH1 regulatory capture)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Recon</strong>: Bankföreningen reviews <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> §3 ärendet-och-dess-beredning.</li>
 <li><strong>Weaponisation</strong>: Technical impact study commissioned (CET1 hit estimation).</li>
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-kill-chain-style-mapping-th1-regulatory-capture">Kill-chain-style map
 <li><strong>Command &#x26; control</strong>: Minority-government whip calibration.</li>
 <li><strong>Objective</strong>: Softer effective capital requirements in Swedish implementation than pure EU baseline.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy">MITRE-style TTP map (political-analogy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy">MITRE-style TTP map (political-analogy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-mitre-style-ttp-map-political-analogy">MITRE-style TTP map (political
 <p><strong>Sources</strong>: All threats anchor to <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a> document text; no speculative attribution to specific actors.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03104">HD03104<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03104"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03104-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Skrivelse (evaluation report)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Finansdepartementet
@@ -1399,16 +1399,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03104">HD03104<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 2.5 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: N/A (reporting document)
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Statutory 4-year evaluation of state debt management 2021–2025, including cost-minimisation outcomes, Riksgälden's strategy, and interaction with Riksbanken monetary policy. Covers pandemic-era borrowing, quantitative-tightening environment, and real-rate normalisation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Niklas Wykman (M))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (FiU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104">Key provisions (Skr. 2025/26:104)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104">Key provisions (Skr. 2025/26:104)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-skr-202526104"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03104 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1441,19 +1441,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Inledning</td><td>Framing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Mål och strategi</td><td>Baseline against targets</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Kostnad + risk 2021–2025</td><td>Outcome metrics</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Reflektioner</td><td>Forward strategy</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 2.5 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Annual reporting cadence, moderate market-shaping power, low electoral salience → solid mid-band.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</li>
 <li>Opposition: partial-cycle framing power (V/MP on rights, S on EU compliance credit).</li>
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" a
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03104" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03104 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03104.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1503,16 +1503,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03104", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03104.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><em>Traceability note: This heading is a shortened paraphrase for readability. For authoritative cross-referencing, use the official document title (<code>titel</code>) in <code>documents/hd03252.json</code> together with dok_id <code>HD03252</code>.</em></p>
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Proposition (ordinary law)
@@ -1523,16 +1523,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252">HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 3.5 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: 1 August 2026
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Restricts access to specified social-insurance benefits (bostadstillägg, aktivitetsersättning, sjukersättning components) for persons placed in kontrollerat boende or säkerhetsförvaring (security detention). Introduces calibrated exceptions for dependant-support. Lagrådet yttrande attached as Bilaga 5.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-1">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-1">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Gunnar Strömmer (M))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (SfU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map-1">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526252"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map-1">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-1"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03252 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1575,19 +1575,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map-1">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Förslag till riksdagsbeslut</td><td>Decision scope</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Bakgrund och skäl</td><td>Policy rationale</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Lagändringar</td><td>Statutory text</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Ikraftträdande</td><td>Effective date + transitional</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Konsekvenser</td><td>Budget/IT/operational impact</td></tr><tr><td>Bilaga 5</td><td>Lagrådets yttrande</td><td>Constitutional review</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes-1">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-1"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength-1">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-1"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes-1">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength-1">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration-1">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration-1">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-1"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 3.5 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Rights-dimension interaction + pre-election effective date + opposition-polarisation potential → upper mid-band.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <p>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</p>
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-1">Stakeholder pressure points<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-1">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-1"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-1">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-1"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03252" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-1">Cross-references to batch<a class="" ari
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03252 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03252.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-1"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1642,16 +1642,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-1">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-1">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-1">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03252", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03252.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer-1">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer-1">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Proposition (EU transposition)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Finansdepartementet
@@ -1661,16 +1661,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253">HD03253<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 3.8 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: Staggered per EU timetable (main provisions 1 January 2027 with transitional output-floor phase-in)
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Transposes CRR3 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1623) and CRD6 (Directive (EU) 2024/1619) into Swedish law. Implements Basel III endgame framework — output floor, revised standardised approach, operational-risk calibration. Amends kapitaltäckningslagen (2014:966) and lag om kapitalbuffertar (2014:966).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-2">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-2">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Niklas Wykman (M))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (FiU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:253)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map-2">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:253)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526253"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map-2">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-2"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03253 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1708,19 +1708,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map-2">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Förslag till riksdagsbeslut</td><td>Decision scope</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Bakgrund och skäl</td><td>Policy rationale</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Lagändringar</td><td>Statutory text</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Ikraftträdande</td><td>Effective date + transitional</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Konsekvenser</td><td>Budget/IT/operational impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes-2">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength-2">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-2"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes-2">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength-2">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration-2">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration-2">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-2"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 3.8 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Systemic financial impact (4 banks), EU mandate, late transposition, sector lobbying → top of batch.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <p>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</p>
@@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-2">Stakeholder pressure points<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-2">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-2">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-2"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03253" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1743,7 +1743,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-2">Cross-references to batch<a class="" ari
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03253 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03253.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-2"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1775,16 +1775,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-2">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-2">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-2">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03253", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03253.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer-2">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer-2">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03256">HD03256<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03256"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03256-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a>
 <strong>Document type</strong>: Proposition (ordinary law)
 <strong>Ministry</strong>: Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdepartementet
@@ -1794,16 +1794,16 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03256">HD03256<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 <strong>DIW score</strong>: 2.8 / 5
 <strong>Effective date</strong>: 1 July 2026
 <strong>Signed</strong>: 2026-04-23 (tabled to Riksdag 2026-04-24)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Expands enforcement powers for police and vehicle inspectors to detect and prosecute tachograph manipulation in heavy-goods road transport. Raises fines, expands inspection authority, clarifies criminal liability for fleet operators. Implements parts of EU Mobility Package enforcement directive.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-3">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-primary-source-anchors-3">Primary-source anchors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-source-anchors-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Full text and bilagor: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html</a></li>
 <li>Government press release: regeringen.se (minister Andreas Carlson (KD))</li>
 <li>Committee page on riksdagen.se (TU) — will update when referral decision is announced</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:256)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-section-map-3">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256">Key provisions (Prop. 2025/26:256)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-prop-202526256"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-section-map-3">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-section-map-3"></a></h4>
 <p>Contents of HD03256 organised by chapter:</p>
 
 
@@ -1841,19 +1841,19 @@ <h3 id="rm-section-map-3">Section map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Chapter</th><th>Focus</th><th>Electoral/Operational salience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Förslag till riksdagsbeslut</td><td>Decision scope</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Bakgrund och skäl</td><td>Policy rationale</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Lagändringar</td><td>Statutory text</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Ikraftträdande</td><td>Effective date + transitional</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Konsekvenser</td><td>Budget/IT/operational impact</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-analytical-notes-3">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-3"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-evidence-strength-3">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-3"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-analytical-notes-3">Analytical notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analytical-notes-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-evidence-strength-3">Evidence strength<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-strength-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary source</strong>: riksdagen.se full text (Admiralty B2 — government official, not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary source</strong>: government press release on regeringen.se (Admiralty B3 — same provenance chain).</li>
 <li><strong>Corroboration opportunities</strong>: committee referral record, Lagrådet yttrande (HD03252), FI QIS (HD03253), Transportstyrelsen impact assessment (HD03256), Riksgälden statistics (HD03104).</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-diw-calibration-3">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-diw-calibration-3">DIW calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-calibration-3"></a></h4>
 <p>DIW 2.8 reflects:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sectoral (road transport) with narrow direct electorate; enforcement lever vs. sectoral manipulation base rates → mid-band.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3">Stakeholder pressure points<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <p>Government: owns narrative; calendar pressure on Riksdag timetable.</p>
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-stakeholder-pressure-points-3">Stakeholder pressure points<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-3">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-3"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-3">Cross-references to batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-references-to-batch-3"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md">executive-brief.md</a> §"HD03256" row.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md">significance-scoring.md</a> for DIW methodology.</li>
@@ -1876,7 +1876,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-references-to-batch-3">Cross-references to batch<a class="" ari
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md">implementation-feasibility.md</a> for HD03256 delivery-risk lenses.</li>
 <li>See <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md">forward-indicators.md</a> for dated indicators tied to HD03256.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment-3"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1908,18 +1908,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment-3">Confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th align="center">Confidence</th><th>Note</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Document authenticity</td><td align="center">VERY HIGH</td><td>Signed PM + responsible minister</td></tr><tr><td>Text interpretation accuracy</td><td align="center">HIGH</td><td>Direct quotation from retrieved full text</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder impact prediction</td><td align="center">MEDIUM</td><td>Based on historical parallels + sector structure</td></tr><tr><td>Electoral-effect estimate</td><td align="center">LOW</td><td>20 weeks to election; segment movement &#x3C; 0.3 pp at referral phase</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-3">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-3">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retrieval</strong>: <code>get_dokument_innehall(dok_id="HD03256", include_full_text=True)</code> via riksdag-regering MCP on 2026-04-24.</li>
 <li><strong>JSON snapshot</strong>: <code>documents/hd03256.json</code> (same folder).</li>
 <li><strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-footer-3">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-footer-3">Methodology footer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-footer-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> — ICD 203 compliant; Admiralty codes assigned; no exfiltration of non-public personal data; GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)+(g) lawful bases applied.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Electoral horizon</strong>: September 2026 Riksdag general election (~20 weeks out).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative">Seat-projection deltas (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative">Seat-projection deltas (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1952,7 +1952,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-projection-deltas-qualitative">Seat-projection deltas (qualitati
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th>Likely net M/KD/L/SD effect</th><th>Likely net S/V/MP/C effect</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>+ law-and-order narrative; KD/SD benefit most</td><td>V opposition galvanises but modest (S avoids issue)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>+ competence signal; M benefits</td><td>S may claim co-authorship of EU compliance</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>+ "tough on crime" adjunct; KD/SD benefit</td><td>Marginal</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>+ fiscal-credibility; M benefits</td><td>Potential opposition attack if data unfavourable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Net effect: <strong>Tidö parties gain marginal advantage from bundle</strong> — ~0.5–1.5 percentage points in aggregate, clustered in law-and-order-sensitive voter segments. See <code>voter-segmentation.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-election">Coalition viability post-election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-election">Coalition viability post-election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-viability-post-election"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>If Tidö parties (M, KD, L, SD) retain majority → bundle's enforcement dates (1 Jul, 1 Aug) fall before election day — "delivered" narrative available.</li>
 <li>If opposition (S-led) wins → probability of repeal: HD03252 <strong>30%</strong>, HD03253 <strong>&#x3C; 5%</strong> (EU-mandated), HD03256 <strong>&#x3C; 10%</strong>, HD03104 <strong>0%</strong> (reporting only).</li>
@@ -1969,14 +1969,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-viability-post-election">Coalition viability post-election<
     style Bundle fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
     style W fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style L fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery">Risk to electoral delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery">Risk to electoral delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-to-electoral-delivery"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> slippage (S2 scenario, 25%) would strip Tidö's "delivered" line → estimated -0.3 pp net.</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> is election-neutral for voters but salient for elite opinion (editorial boards, business lobby).</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate">Current seat map (Riksdag 2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate">Current seat map (Riksdag 2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-map-riksdag-2022-mandate">Current seat map (Riksdag 2022
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th align="center">Seats</th><th>Coalition</th><th>Whip discipline</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S (Socialdemokraterna)</td><td align="center">107</td><td>Opposition</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>M (Moderaterna)</td><td align="center">68</td><td>Tidö (gov)</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>SD (Sverigedemokraterna)</td><td align="center">73</td><td>Tidö confidence</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>V (Vänsterpartiet)</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>C (Centerpartiet)</td><td align="center">24</td><td>Opposition</td><td>Medium</td></tr><tr><td>KD (Kristdemokraterna)</td><td align="center">19</td><td>Tidö (gov)</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td>L (Liberalerna)</td><td align="center">16</td><td>Tidö (gov)</td><td><strong>Medium</strong> (rebellion risk on rights issues)</td></tr><tr><td>MP (Miljöpartiet)</td><td align="center">18</td><td>Opposition</td><td>High</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>349</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö bloc</strong> (M+KD+L+SD)</td><td align="center"><strong>176</strong></td><td></td><td>Majority = 175 — Tidö holds <strong>+1</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Opposition</strong> (S+V+C+MP)</td><td align="center"><strong>173</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill">Pivotal votes per bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill">Pivotal votes per bill<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pivotal-votes-per-bill">Pivotal votes per bill<a class="" aria-hidden
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Bill</th><th align="center">Majority needed</th><th align="center">Tidö bloc</th><th align="center">Margin</th><th>Pivotal scenario</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td align="center">175 Ja</td><td align="center">176 Ja</td><td align="center"><strong>+1</strong></td><td>2 L rebels = defeat</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td align="center">175 Ja</td><td align="center">176 Ja (+ likely S tactical Ja on EU)</td><td align="center">~+100</td><td>Safe (EU-mandated)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td align="center">175 Ja</td><td align="center">176 Ja (likely + C)</td><td align="center">~+50</td><td>Safe</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td align="center">Notering (no vote)</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">—</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-critical-vote-hd03252">Critical vote: HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-vote-hd03252"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-critical-vote-hd03252">Critical vote: HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-critical-vote-hd03252"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>+1 margin</strong> is the binding constraint of the Tidö minority-support framework. Two scenarios change arithmetic:</p>
 
 
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-critical-vote-hd03252">Critical vote: HD03252<a class="" aria-hidden=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Scenario</th><th>Outcome</th><th align="center">Probability</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>L whip holds</td><td>176 Ja → bill passes</td><td align="center">70%</td></tr><tr><td>1 L MP abstains</td><td>175 Ja → still passes (simple majority on Ja count)</td><td align="center">20%</td></tr><tr><td>2+ L MPs abstain or vote Nej</td><td>Bill fails or must be amended</td><td align="center">10%</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario">Sainte-Laguë projection (2026 baseline scenario)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario">Sainte-Laguë projection (2026 baseline scenario)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario"></a></h3>
 <p>Assuming +2pp M/KD aggregate shift (partly attributable to delivery bundle) and -1.5pp L shift:</p>
 
 
@@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sainte-laguë-projection-2026-baseline-scenario">Sainte-Laguë projec
     y-axis "Seats" 150 --> 185
     bar [176, 179]
     line [173, 170]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference">Vote-count discipline historical reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference">Vote-count discipline historical reference<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2223,8 +2223,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-vote-count-discipline-historical-reference">Vote-count discipline his
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Past vote</th><th align="center">Tidö bloc Ja</th><th align="center">L rebels</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01CU27 Barnkonventionen (2023)</td><td align="center">175</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>Tidö migration reform 2024</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Säkerhetsförvaring lag (2024/25)</td><td align="center">176</td><td align="center">0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>On <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>-type rights-adjacent bills, whip has held 2/2 historically. Not a guarantee.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-demographic-segments">Demographic segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segments"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-demographic-segments">Demographic segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-demographic-segments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-demographic-segments">Demographic segments<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>HD03252 impact</th><th>HD03253 impact</th><th>HD03256 impact</th><th>HD03104 impact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Urban M-leaning (35–55, high income)</td><td>+</td><td>+ (competence)</td><td>0</td><td>+</td></tr><tr><td>SD/KD-leaning (rural, 45+)</td><td>++ (law-and-order)</td><td>0</td><td>++ (anti-cheating)</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>S-leaning (working-class, urban)</td><td>– (class-justice concern)</td><td>0 (EU-neutral)</td><td>+ (road safety)</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>V-leaning (young urban, progressive)</td><td>–– (rights concern)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>MP-leaning (young urban, environmental)</td><td>–</td><td>0</td><td>+ (fewer manipulated tachographs = climate)</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>C-leaning (rural business owners)</td><td>0</td><td>– (small-bank proportionality)</td><td>+</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>Swing voters (decided in last 2 weeks, 2022)</td><td>+ slight, law-and-order framing</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-segments">Regional segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-segments">Regional segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-segments"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2314,18 +2314,18 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-segments">Regional segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Region</th><th>Key interaction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Stockholm county</td><td>HD03253 (banking sector HQ concentration)</td></tr><tr><td>Västra Götaland</td><td>HD03256 (heavy-goods corridors E6/E20)</td></tr><tr><td>Norrland (Norrbotten, Västerbotten)</td><td>HD03252 (per-capita correctional use higher)</td></tr><tr><td>Skåne</td><td>All (mixed urban/rural)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-ideological-segments">Ideological segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-segments"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ideological-segments">Ideological segments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ideological-segments"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Authoritarian-security axis</strong>: strongly pro-<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>, pro-<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Libertarian-rights axis</strong>: opposed to expanded state coercion.</li>
 <li><strong>Pro-EU pragmatists</strong>: neutral on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> (alignment positive but late); positive on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> fiscal discipline.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days">Baseline positions on procedural days<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days">Baseline positions on procedural days<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-positions-on-procedural-days"></a></h3>
 <p>On a low-drama propositions day (which today is, electorally — high-salience items but procedural not legislative stage), voter movement is <strong>&#x3C;0.3 pp</strong> in any segment. Real movement occurs at committee-report stage and Kammaren vote.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Nordic (Denmark, Finland, Norway) + EU (Germany, Netherlands).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2368,17 +2368,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>CRR3/CRD6 transposition status (April 2026)</th><th>Detainee benefit regime</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>✅ Transposed Jan 2026 (on time)</td><td>Restricted benefits during imprisonment; upkeep obligation</td><td>DK model closer to what <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> now introduces</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>✅ Transposed Feb 2026</td><td>Fängsligt isolerade; social-insurance suspended not fully terminated</td><td>Finland's Art. 8 ECHR jurisprudence informed by KKO cases</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>N/A (not EU)</td><td>Separate framework; limited benefit during custodial sentences</td><td>Historical precedent; comparable outcomes</td></tr><tr><td>Germany</td><td>✅ Transposed Jan 2026 (BaFin implementation)</td><td>Differentiated by sentence type; constitutional proportionality bar high</td><td>BVerfG case law central</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands</td><td>⚠️ Partial transposition (DNB flagged gaps)</td><td>Active reform debate; no full restriction yet</td><td>Sweden + NL both late</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-analysis">Outside-In analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-analysis"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Sweden's CRR3 late transposition</strong> (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>) places it in the NL-led late cohort, not the DK/FI-led on-time cohort. EU Commission pattern suggests reasoned-opinion letters precede infringement procedures by ~90 days — putting Sweden in the Q3 2026 risk window.</li>
 <li><strong>Detainee benefit restriction</strong> (<a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>) aligns Sweden with DK, which has 5+ years of operational experience. Swedish implementation risk lower because of DK template availability; civil-liberty pushback likely to cite DK proportionality litigation.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-lessons-learned-transfer">Lessons-learned transfer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-learned-transfer"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lessons-learned-transfer">Lessons-learned transfer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lessons-learned-transfer"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>From DK</strong>: Pre-empt proportionality challenge by embedding carve-outs for dependant-support in regulation (not primary law) — allows faster adjustment.</li>
 <li><strong>From DE</strong>: Bundesverfassungsgericht precedents establish that indefinite preventive detention (säkerhetsförvaring equivalent — <em>Sicherungsverwahrung</em>) requires robust therapeutic element; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> benefit restrictions may face similar scrutiny if not paired with rehabilitative investment.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid-comparison">Mermaid comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-comparison"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid-comparison">Mermaid comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid-comparison"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     SE[🇸🇪 Sweden&#x3C;br/>HD03253 late CRR3&#x3C;br/>HD03252 new restrictions]
     DK[🇩🇰 Denmark&#x3C;br/>On-time CRR3&#x3C;br/>Established detainee regime]
@@ -2392,8 +2392,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid-comparison">Mermaid comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style DE fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
     style FI fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968">Parallel 1 — 2014 Basel III transposition (Lag 2014:968)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968">Parallel 1 — 2014 Basel III transposition (Lag 2014:968)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: <strong>0.75</strong>
 <strong>Comparator</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> vs. 2014 Basel III domestic legislation.
 <strong>Similarities</strong>:</p>
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-1--2014-basel-iii-transposition-lag-2014968">Parallel 1 —
 <li>2014 happened at inflation-target floor; 2026 at 2.25% policy rate.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Committee phase in 2014 saw substantive amendments to output-floor phasing. Expect similar in 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156">Parallel 2 — 2006 Fängelsestraff + social-insurance reform (Prop. 2005/06:156)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156">Parallel 2 — 2006 Fängelsestraff + social-insurance reform (Prop. 2005/06:156)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506156"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: <strong>0.65</strong>
 <strong>Comparator</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> vs. 2006 benefit-restriction reform for inmates.
 <strong>Similarities</strong>:</p>
@@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-2--2006-fängelsestraff--social-insurance-reform-prop-200506
 <li>2006 did not include a new sentence form (säkerhetsförvaring is novel).</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: 2006 amendments eventually survived with carve-outs for dependant-support. Path of least resistance for 2026 is similar compromise.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform">Parallel 3 — 2019 Körtidsregler (driving-time enforcement reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform">Parallel 3 — 2019 Körtidsregler (driving-time enforcement reform)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Similarity score</strong>: <strong>0.80</strong>
 <strong>Comparator</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> vs. 2019 driving-time enforcement bill.
 <strong>Similarities</strong>:</p>
@@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-parallel-3--2019-körtidsregler-driving-time-enforcement-reform">Para
 <li>2019 did not expand search powers; 2026 does.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: 2019 enforcement took ~18 months to ramp; expect similar for HD03256 post 1 July 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content">No-precedent finding: HD03104 evaluation content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content">No-precedent finding: HD03104 evaluation content<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2021–2025 evaluation period overlaps with unprecedented pandemic-era borrowing (2020–2021). No clean pre-2000 parallel exists. <strong>Historical pattern search returns no match.</strong> Treat HD03104 as <em>sui generis</em> for precedent purposes; evaluate on first-principles cost-minimisation-vs-risk metrics.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">timeline
     title Historical parallels timeline
@@ -2442,9 +2442,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-no-precedent-finding-hd03104-evaluation-content">No-precedent finding
     2026 : Today's bundle
          : HD03252 + HD03253 + HD03256</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill">Delivery-risk register (four lenses per bill)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction">HD03252 — Detainee benefits restriction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill">Delivery-risk register (four lenses per bill)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-delivery-risk-register-four-lenses-per-bill"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction">HD03252 — Detainee benefits restriction<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2476,7 +2476,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03252--detainee-benefits-restriction">HD03252 — Detainee benefits
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Risk level</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>§7 konsekvenser of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> estimates modest savings — not a budget stress point</td></tr><tr><td>IT</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Försäkringskassan must update benefit-eligibility rules engine by 1 Aug 2026 — ~3 months from passage</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>Lagrådet proportionality feedback (Bilaga 5) may force implementing-regulation language changes</td></tr><tr><td>Workforce</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>Kriminalvården + Försäkringskassan case-worker retraining</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package">HD03253 — EU Banking Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package">HD03253 — EU Banking Package<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03253--eu-banking-package">HD03253 — EU Banking Package<a class="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Risk level</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Regulatory-compliance burden falls on banks, not state</td></tr><tr><td>IT</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>FI supervisory data-ingestion updates for CRR3 disclosures</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Interplay with existing Swedish systemic-risk buffers; Basel III endgame complexity</td></tr><tr><td>Workforce</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>FI hiring plan already in motion from 2023 QIS work</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement">HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement">HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2540,9 +2540,9 @@ <h3 id="rm-hd03256--tachograph-enforcement">HD03256 — Tachograph enforcement<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Lens</th><th align="center">Risk level</th><th>Notes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Budget</td><td align="center">Medium</td><td>Training Polismyndigheten + bilinspektörer on new search protocols</td></tr><tr><td>IT</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Existing tachograph database sufficient</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Clear EU framework</td></tr><tr><td>Workforce</td><td align="center"><strong>HIGH</strong></td><td>Bilinspektör role expansion requires cert program; 1 July 2026 deadline tight</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation">HD03104 — Debt-mgmt evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation">HD03104 — Debt-mgmt evaluation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03104--debt-mgmt-evaluation"></a></h4>
 <p>Reporting only — no implementation risk.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-backlog-audit">Backlog audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-backlog-audit"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-backlog-audit">Backlog audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-backlog-audit"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2565,7 +2565,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-backlog-audit">Backlog audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Adjacent pending reform</th><th>Interaction with today's bundle</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pending revision of arbetslöshetsförsäkring</td><td>Administrative overlap with Försäkringskassan IT workload</td></tr><tr><td>FI AI-risk supervisory framework</td><td>CRR3 disclosure co-dependencies</td></tr><tr><td>Transport planning bill 2026</td><td>Tachograph enforcement sync</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map">Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map">Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
     HD03252[HD03252] --> IT52[IT: HIGH]
     HD03252 --> REG52[Reg: Med]
@@ -2576,26 +2576,26 @@ <h2 id="rm-mermaid--delivery-risk-heat-map">Mermaid — delivery-risk heat map<a
     style REG53 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e
     style WF56 fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ff006e</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-working-hypothesis">Working hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-working-hypothesis"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-working-hypothesis">Working hypothesis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-working-hypothesis"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>H0 (working)</strong>: The 23 April 2026 bundle represents a coherent Tidö "pre-election delivery" strategy combining financial-stability institutionalisation with criminal-justice operationalisation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy">H1: Bundle is artefact, not strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-competing-hypotheses">Competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy">H1: Bundle is artefact, not strategy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h1-bundle-is-artefact-not-strategy"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: The 4 bills were ready on 23 April by legal-drafting coincidence, not political choreography.
 <strong>Supporting evidence</strong>: Documents span 4 different ministries (Finansdep. × 2, Justitiedep., Landsbygdsdep.) — unusual coordination cost for intentional bundling.
 <strong>Against</strong>: All 4 signed by PM Kristersson personally on the same day — that IS coordination.
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>LIKELY</strong> for <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> (statutory calendar), <strong>UNLIKELY</strong> for HD03252+HD03253 which required cabinet approval alignment.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch">H2: EU pressure, not Tidö priorities, drives the batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch">H2: EU pressure, not Tidö priorities, drives the batch<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h2-eu-pressure-not-tidö-priorities-drives-the-batch"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> is EU-mandated; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> implements EU Mobility Package. Tidö fingerprint is weaker than public narrative.
 <strong>Supporting evidence</strong>: 2 of 4 documents are EU transpositions. Finance Minister Wykman is the workhorse, not Justice Minister Strömmer.
 <strong>Against</strong>: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is purely domestic and carries clearest Tidö signature.
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>PARTIAL SUPPORT</strong> — H2 is correct for 2/4 documents; narrative framing conflates Tidö with EU compliance.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny">H3: Pre-election "flooding the zone" to suppress individual scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny">H3: Pre-election "flooding the zone" to suppress individual scrutiny<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-h3-pre-election-flooding-the-zone-to-suppress-individual-scrutiny"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: Releasing 4 bills same day is intentional information-asymmetry tactic.
 <strong>Supporting evidence</strong>: Pattern seen in Tidö comms strategy 2023–2025; <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> is the most politically sensitive and benefits from dilution.
 <strong>Against</strong>: Lagrådet and FiU/SfU referral processes ensure substantive scrutiny regardless of release timing.
 <strong>Assessment</strong>: <strong>PLAUSIBLE</strong> — probability ~30%. Hard to falsify without inside-comms documentation.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2651,21 +2651,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Evidence</th><th align="center">H0 Strategy</th><th align="center">H1 Artefact</th><th align="center">H2 EU-driven</th><th align="center">H3 Zone-flood</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>All 4 signed by PM same day</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">–</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>2 of 4 are EU transpositions</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td></tr><tr><td>Hard effective dates pre-election (HD03256, HD03252)</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Different ministries</td><td align="center">–</td><td align="center">+</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">+</td></tr><tr><td>Lagrådet process ongoing</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">–</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Posterior weight</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.40</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.15</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.25</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>0.20</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-red-team-challenge">Red-team challenge<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-red-team-challenge"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Assumption under challenge</strong>: We assume Tidö cohesion holds. What if L backbenchers rebel on <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>? — see <code>coalition-mathematics.md</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Assumption under challenge</strong>: We assume Swedish banks lobby AGAINST <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a>. Counter: some banks may actually prefer strict EU alignment for cross-border competitive parity.</li>
 <li><strong>Assumption under challenge</strong>: We assume <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> is low-salience. Counter: if it reveals fiscal slippage, it becomes a major opposition weapon.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-alternatives-logged">Rejected alternatives logged<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives-logged"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-alternatives-logged">Rejected alternatives logged<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-alternatives-logged"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>"The batch is a response to a specific crisis" — rejected: no crisis reported in Riksdag chamber record 21–23 April 2026.</li>
 <li>"HD03252 is constitutionally unsafe and will be struck by HFD" — rejected for now: Lagrådet yttrande exists (Bilaga 5 of <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a>) and the proposition proceeded — threshold evidence is against full unconstitutionality.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p>Per <code>analysis/methodologies/political-classification-guide.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2722,13 +2722,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-classification-matrix">Classification matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>1. Policy domain</th><th>2. Actor</th><th>3. Geography</th><th>4. Time horizon</th><th align="center">5. Salience</th><th align="center">6. Controversy</th><th>7. Data sensitivity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>Fiscal / debt mgmt</td><td>Finansdepartementet (Wykman)</td><td>National</td><td>Retrospective 2021–25</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low</td><td>Public OSINT</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Criminal justice × social insurance</td><td>Justitiedep. (Strömmer) + Försäkringskassan operational</td><td>National (Swedish prisons)</td><td>Forward (effective 1 Aug 2026)</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong> (Art. 9 GDPR, ECHR Art. 8)</td><td>Public OSINT (but implicates Art. 9 data in implementation)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>Financial regulation / EU</td><td>Finansdep. (Wykman) + FI supervisory</td><td>Supra-national (EU) / national</td><td>Rolling transposition</td><td align="center"><strong>High</strong></td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td>Public OSINT</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Transport / criminal law</td><td>Landsbygdsdep. (Carlson) + Polisen</td><td>National (heavy-goods corridors)</td><td>Forward (1 Jul 2026)</td><td align="center">Med</td><td align="center">Low-Med</td><td>Public OSINT</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>T1 (Immediate action)</strong>: HD03253, HD03252</li>
 <li><strong>T2 (Active monitoring)</strong>: HD03256</li>
 <li><strong>T3 (Contextual)</strong>: HD03104</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-retention--access"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Retention</strong>: 5 years (analysis artifacts), indefinite (public source URLs).</li>
 <li><strong>Access</strong>: Public (all source documents are official Regeringen/Riksdagen publications).</li>
@@ -2747,21 +2747,21 @@ <h2 id="rm-retention--access">Retention &#x26; access<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
     style T2 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style T3 fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment">Cluster A: Financial stability &#x26; EU alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-policy-clusters">Policy clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment">Cluster A: Financial stability &#x26; EU alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-a-financial-stability--eu-alignment"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a> EU bankpaket (primary)</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a> Statens skuldförvaltning (context)</li>
 <li>Linkage: Both Finansdepartementet; both position government on macro-financial credibility into 2026 election.</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation">Cluster B: Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation">Cluster B: Tidö criminal-justice operationalisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-b-tidö-criminal-justice-operationalisation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a> Detainee benefit restriction (primary)</li>
 <li><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a> Tachograph enforcement (adjacent — expands search powers)</li>
 <li>Linkage: Both expand state coercive authority (HD03252 over benefits; HD03256 over search). Both carry 2026 effective dates.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-chains"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2793,13 +2793,13 @@ <h2 id="rm-legislative-chains">Legislative chains<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Parent reform</th><th>Today's document</th><th>Next step</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tidö-avtalet § straff &#x26; brott</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>SfU referral → committee report → Kammaren vote pre-recess</td></tr><tr><td>EU Banking Package CRR3/CRD6 (Brussels 2023)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>FiU referral → hearings → vote before summer recess</td></tr><tr><td>EU Mobility Package II (2020)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>TU referral → vote pre-1 July 2026 deadline</td></tr><tr><td>Budgetlagen §5:6 (quinquennial reporting)</td><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>FiU assesses; report to Kammaren</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-activity patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coordinated-activity-patterns">Coordinated-activity patterns<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coordinated-activity-patterns"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Batch-day publication</strong> — 4 bills same day suggests comms-coordinated release; dilutes per-bill scrutiny (documented pattern on high-agenda days at <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">riksdagen.se</a>).</li>
 <li><strong>Pre-recess enactment window</strong> — effective dates (1 Jul HD03256, 1 Aug HD03252) require Kammaren votes by mid-June.</li>
 <li><strong>Minister load balancing</strong> — Wykman carries 2 (finance dossier strong); Strömmer 1 (justice high-salience); Carlson 1 (KD visibility on infra).</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-folder-citations"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/propositions/</code> (if produced) — source day for 3 of 4 documents (lookback).</li>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/motions/</code> — check for opposition counter-motions.</li>
@@ -2822,15 +2822,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-folder-citations">Sibling-folder citations<a class="" aria-hi
     style EU fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
     style BL fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>VITAL audit of this run's methodology.</strong> Per <code>osint-tradecraft-standards.md</code> §ICD 203.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency">Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-sufficiency">Evidence sufficiency<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-sufficiency"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>4 primary source documents</strong> retrieved with full text ≥ 100 000 chars each via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code>.</li>
 <li>Every analytical claim in this run is anchored to either a <code>dok_id</code> or a primary-source URL on <code>riksdagen.se</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Gap</strong>: No SCB, Riksbanken, IMF, or EU Commission cross-corroboration in this run (single-type workflow scope; reserved for aggregation runs). Flagged.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2858,12 +2858,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Confidence band</th><th align="center">Count</th><th>Example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HIGH / VERY HIGH</td><td align="center">2</td><td>KJ-1, KJ-2 (<code>intelligence-assessment.md</code>)</td></tr><tr><td>MEDIUM</td><td align="center">2</td><td>KJ-3, KJ-4</td></tr><tr><td>LOW / VERY LOW</td><td align="center">1</td><td>KJ-5 (coalition cohesion)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Balance is appropriate — no false-precision claims; LOW flagged honestly.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-diversity">Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-diversity">Source diversity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-diversity"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Single-channel</strong>: All evidence from one MCP server (<code>riksdag-regering</code>). Source Diversity Rule says P0/P1 claims need ≥ 3 independent sources; this run has none at P0/P1 threshold, which is acceptable for a referral-phase analysis. Future runs should enrich with FI, Riksbanken, EU Commission sources.</li>
 <li>Admiralty codes: predominantly <strong>B2</strong> (usually reliable — government official source; probably true — text not yet independently corroborated).</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2925,7 +2925,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-party-neutrality-arithmetic">Party-neutrality arithmetic<a class="" a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party mentioned</th><th align="center">Positive frames</th><th align="center">Negative frames</th><th align="center">Neutral</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td align="center">4 (delivery)</td><td align="center">1 (late EU)</td><td align="center">5</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td align="center">2 (Carlson HD03256)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (reduced footprint, potential rebellion)</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (mandate count)</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td align="center">1 (pro-EU on HD03253)</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1 (opposition framing)</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">2</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Balance check</strong>: Coverage skews government-side due to bundle authorship (unavoidable for a propositions-only run). Opposition stakeholder modelling is mapped but lacks primary-source statements (opposition hasn't spoken yet — referral phase). <strong>Acceptable</strong>, flagged for aggregation enrichment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 compliance audit (9 standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 compliance audit (9 standards)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2992,19 +2992,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-compliance-audit-9-standards">ICD 203 compliance audit (9 sta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th align="center">#</th><th>Standard</th><th align="center">Status</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">1</td><td>Describes the quality and reliability of underlying sources</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>This §"Source diversity" + per-claim Admiralty codes</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td>Properly caveats and expresses uncertainties</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Confidence labels on every KJ</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td>Distinguishes between intelligence and assumptions</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code> §"Key Assumptions Check"</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td>Incorporates alternative analysis</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>devils-advocate.md</code> — 3 competing hypotheses via ACH</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td>Relevance of information to US/SE policy decisions</td><td align="center">✅</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code> §"3 Decisions"</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td>Logical argumentation</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>Each KJ traced to explicit evidence</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td>Consistency with prior reports</td><td align="center">⚠️</td><td>No prior runs for 2026-04-24; cross-session check deferred</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td>Accurate judgments of change</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>KJ-1 frames the "implementation-mode" shift</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td>Authorship clearly identified</td><td align="center">✅</td><td>James Pether Sörling</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252">Improvement 1 — Parse Lagrådet yttrande (Bilaga 5 of HD03252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run">Methodology Improvements (for next run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements-for-next-run"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252">Improvement 1 — Parse Lagrådet yttrande (Bilaga 5 of HD03252)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--parse-lagrådet-yttrande-bilaga-5-of-hd03252"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Current gap</strong>: This run references Lagrådet yttrande existence but did not parse its substance (time-constrained Pass 1). Pass 2 would ideally extract proportionality critique text to raise KJ-3 confidence from MEDIUM to HIGH.</p>
 <p><strong>Action next run</strong>: Script-driven extraction of proposition §"Lagrådet" sections into dedicated artifact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment">Improvement 2 — SCB / Riksbanken cross-source enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment">Improvement 2 — SCB / Riksbanken cross-source enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--scb--riksbanken-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Current gap</strong>: Single-channel MCP sourcing. Missing SCB baseline on incarcerated-persons population and Riksbanken stance on CRR3.</p>
 <p><strong>Action next run</strong>: Budget 5 minutes for SCB <code>search_tables</code> + <code>query_table</code> on relevant series; include Riksbanken statement if press release is linkable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Opposition reaction monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Opposition reaction monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--opposition-reaction-monitoring"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Current gap</strong>: Analysis written before opposition party-group statements issued. Stakeholder mapping is predictive, not empirical.</p>
 <p><strong>Action next run</strong>: Schedule a follow-up evening-analysis run for 2026-04-25 or 26 to capture reactions; cross-reference with this analysis via <code>cross-run-diff.md</code>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging">Improvement 4 (bonus) — Tier-upgrade candidate flagging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging">Improvement 4 (bonus) — Tier-upgrade candidate flagging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-bonus--tier-upgrade-candidate-flagging"></a></h4>
 <p>Current run scoped as Standard tier due to 28-min MCP idle budget. Budget compression prevented DIW ≥ 3.5 items from getting L2+ Priority treatment they arguably deserve. Next time: explicitly flag L3 candidates for immediate aggregation run rather than deferring.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-known-limitations-of-this-run">Known limitations of this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-known-limitations-of-this-run">Known limitations of this run<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-known-limitations-of-this-run"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Compressed time budget (~28 min) required scope triage — per-document coverage maintained but each file shorter than ideal.</li>
 <li>Pass 2 depth calibrated to MCP-session survival; any Pass 2 under 5 minutes should be treated as "mitigation pass" rather than true iterative improvement.</li>
@@ -3012,7 +3012,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-known-limitations-of-this-run">Known limitations of this run<a class=
 </ol>
 <hr>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Generated</strong>: 2026-04-24 00:28 UTC
 <strong>Workflow</strong>: news-propositions
 <strong>Run ID</strong>: 24865726626
@@ -3022,7 +3022,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden
 <strong>Data sources</strong>: <code>get_propositioner</code>, <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> (riksdag-regering MCP, session 4N6ZRTD5)
 <strong>Window used</strong>: 2026-04-23 00:00–23:59 Europe/Stockholm
 <strong>MCP availability</strong>: <code>riksdag-regering</code> ✅ live (get_sync_status OK at 00:27Z); <code>scb</code>, <code>world-bank</code> not called this run (single-type propositions scope).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents">Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents">Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3074,7 +3074,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents">Documents<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Ministry</th><th>Committee</th><th>Retrieval UTC</th><th>Full text</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03104.html">HD03104</a></td><td>Utvärdering av statens upplåning och skuldförvaltning 2021–2025</td><td>Skrivelse (Written Communication)</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>FiU (Finansutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03252.html">HD03252</a></td><td>En begränsning av rätten till socialförsäkringsförmåner för den som avtjänar fängelsestraff, vistas i kontrollerat boende eller är underkastad säkerhetsförvaring</td><td>Proposition (Government Bill)</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>SfU (Socialförsäkringsutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03253.html">HD03253</a></td><td>EU:s bankpaket</td><td>Proposition (Government Bill)</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>FiU (Finansutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD03256.html">HD03256</a></td><td>Kraftfullare åtgärder mot manipulation och allvarligt missbruk av färdskrivare</td><td>Proposition (Government Bill)</td><td>Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdepartementet</td><td>TU (Trafikutskottet)</td><td>2026-04-24T00:27Z</td><td>✅ 100 KB retrieved</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coverage">Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coverage">Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coverage"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>propositions</strong>: 30 downloaded, 4 date-matched, 26 excluded (non-matching dates in the MCP window).</li>
 <li><strong>motions</strong>: 0 (out of scope — <code>--doc-type propositions</code>)</li>
@@ -3082,15 +3082,45 @@ <h2 id="rm-coverage">Coverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="
 <li><strong>votes</strong>: 0 (not in scope — no vote rounds matched for these document IDs yet; referral phase)</li>
 <li><strong>speeches / questions / interpellations</strong>: 0 (out of scope)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data-quality notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-data-quality-notes">Data-quality notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-quality-notes"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Lookback fallback active</strong> — 0 docs published under 2026-04-24; falling back to 2026-04-23 retrieved 4 bills signed by PM Kristersson on 2026-04-23. Normal Swedish government pattern (Thursday release, Friday indexing).</li>
 <li><strong>Full text</strong>: All 4 documents have <code>fullContent</code> ≥ 100 000 chars via <code>get_dokument_innehall</code> — none flagged <code>metadata-only</code>.</li>
 <li><strong>Tachograph document (HD03256)</strong> cross-references transport-law enforcement discussions but no vote record yet — committee referral (TU) expected within 14 days.</li>
 <li><strong>No SCB/IMF calls</strong> this run — fiscal context sourced from MCP document text only. Economic enrichment deferred to evening-analysis or weekly-review workflows.</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance-4">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance-4">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance-4"></a></h3>
 <p>All <code>dok_id</code> are resolvable at <code>https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/{dok_id}.html</code> (verified pattern). No private or leaked data.</p>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03104-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03104-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03252-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03252-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03253-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03253-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/documents/HD03256-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03256-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
+</ul>
         </div>
 
       <section class="rm-article-sources" aria-labelledby="rm-article-sources-heading">
@@ -3143,7 +3173,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T11:10:12.956Z">2026-04-25 11:10 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:34.540Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html b/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html
index 1394c2ef82..dbad50a5ec 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Month Ahead — May 2026: Sweden at the Pre-Election Inflection Point">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T14:46:43.879Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.697Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T14:46:43.879Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.697Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-25T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Month Ahead — May 2026: Sweden at the Pre-Election Inflection Point","description":"Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-election legislative package: the 2026 Spring Budget (HD03100) projecting continued but slow economic recovery, an emergency…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T14:46:43.879Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03237-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Month Ahead — May 2026: Sweden at the Pre-Election Inflection Point","description":"Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-election legislative package: the 2026 Spring Budget (HD03100) projecting continued but slow economic recovery, an emergency…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:34.697Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03237-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-election legislative package: the 2026 Spring Budget (HD03100) projecting continued but slow economic recovery, an emergency fuel and energy cost relief (HD03236), and a 19-proposition legislative sprint across justice, energy, environment, and foreign policy. With elections exactly five months away (September 2026), the political risk is firmly centred on economic sentiment — whether household cost relief arrives in time to shift voter preferences — and on the government's credibility on rule-of-law reforms that have been central to the Tidö coalition's mandate since 2022.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Economic risk assessment</strong>: Should stakeholders price in accelerated political instability risk before the September 2026 election given the extended recession and the emergency relief budget?</li>
 <li><strong>Legislative pipeline tracking</strong>: Which of the 19 current propositions carry the highest risk of opposition delay or committee blockage before the summer recess (June 2026)?</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition stability</strong>: Does the fuel-tax cut (HD03236) signal SD pressure on the government, and how does that shift coalition mathematics heading into election season?</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-intelligence-read">60-Second Intelligence Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-intelligence-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-intelligence-read">60-Second Intelligence Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-intelligence-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100)</strong> — Spring budget framework projects slow recovery; lågkonjunktur persists longer than earlier forecast. Government targets growth, welfare, security. FiU scrutiny June.</li>
 <li>🔴 <strong>Emergency fuel+energy relief (HD03236)</strong> — Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el/gasprisstöd; election-cycle fiscal signal. Cost estimated at several billion SEK.</li>
@@ -234,11 +234,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-intelligence-read">60-Second Intelligence Read<a class="" a
 <li>🟢 <strong>Ukraine accountability</strong>: Sweden joins aggression tribunal (HD03231) and damages commission (HD03232) — foreign policy cohesion across parties.</li>
 <li>🔵 <strong>Forestry deregulation (HD03242)</strong> — contentious Alliansen/landsbygd vote; MP/S/V opposed.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may">Top Forward Trigger for May<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may">Top Forward Trigger for May<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: Finance Committee (FiU) vote on Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100) and extra ändringsbudget (HD03236) — expected late May / early June. A negative committee opinion or SD abstention on the fiscal framework would be the single most significant political event before the summer recess.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH</strong> [B2] — Based on 20 verified government propositions and skrivelser from data.riksdagen.se, riksmöte 2025/26.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'nodeBorder': '#00d9ff', 'clusterBkg': '#1a1e3d', 'titleColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
@@ -257,12 +257,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style G fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style I fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Tier</strong>: Tier-C Month-Ahead</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-intelligence-picture">Lead Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-intelligence-picture">Lead Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>May 2026 represents Sweden's most consequential legislative month of the election cycle. The Tidö government (M, SD, KD, L with MP support on energy) is racing to deliver tangible voter benefits before the September 2026 election. The concurrent filing of Vårpropositionen 2026 (HD03100), an emergency relief budget (HD03236), and 17 additional propositions in a single April wave signals a politically motivated legislative sprint.</p>
 <p><strong>Central intelligence assessment</strong>: The government is executing a pre-election delivery strategy targeting three voter segments — cost-pressured households (fuel/energy relief), law-and-order prioritisers (justice package), and rural/landsbygd voters (forestry, wind revenue, harbour law). The strategy is coherent but vulnerable: if economic data for Q1 2026 show continued contraction when released in May, the government's narrative of "recovery under way" collapses.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>DIW Weight</th><th>Intelligence Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>9.8</td><td>L3 Intelligence-grade</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra budget — fuel/energy relief</td><td>9.2</td><td>L3 Intelligence-grade</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>8.5</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8.0</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>7.8</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning</td><td>7.5</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>7.2</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>7.0</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine aggression tribunal</td><td>6.8</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine damages commission</td><td>6.8</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>6.5</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategi mot mäns våld</td><td>6.2</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03253</td><td>EU bankpaket</td><td>6.0</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet datadelning</td><td>5.5</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Socialförsäkring vid fängelse</td><td>5.5</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Economic security vector (CRITICAL)</strong>: The spring budget and emergency relief reflect a government reading household cost pain as the primary electoral vulnerability. The fuel tax cut combined with electricity/gas price support sends a direct signal to households that costs are being addressed. This is responsive governance or election-cycle pandering depending on the observer's frame — the fiscal cost is real (est. SEK 4–8 bn for the combined package based on proportional estimates from HD03236 scope).</p>
 <p><strong>Rule-of-law vector (HIGH)</strong>: The justice package — paid police education, tougher juvenile rules, prisoner benefit restriction — is direct Tidö mandate delivery. M/KD designed these; SD supports; L has reservations on youth justice. S/V/MP oppose on rights grounds. Passage is secured (M+SD+KD majority ≈ 175 seats), but committee debates will be televised and will shape media framing.</p>
 <p><strong>Energy transition vector (HIGH)</strong>: New electricity system laws (HD03240) and wind power municipality revenue sharing (HD03239) represent the government's energy security strategy. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) is a major institutional change reducing Länsstyrelse/Mark- och miljödomstol processing times for critical infrastructure. Opposition from MP is expected on process grounds.</p>
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a cl
     "Forestry HD03242": [0.75, 0.65]
     "Police Education HD03237": [0.30, 0.75]
     "Wind Revenue HD03239": [0.50, 0.70]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle">PIR Handoff (Priority Intelligence Requirements for Next Cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle">PIR Handoff (Priority Intelligence Requirements for Next Cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP data release (Statistics Sweden, likely May 2026) — will it confirm or contradict the government's "recovery under way" narrative?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: FiU committee position on HD03100/HD03236 — first opposition position statements expected May 2026.</li>
@@ -412,27 +412,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle">PIR Ha
 <li><strong>PIR-4</strong>: Environmental review authority (HD03238) — Länsstyrelse and NGO responses to institutional restructuring.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence">Key Judgment 1 — Economic Recovery Remains Fragile [MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence">Key Judgment 1 — Economic Recovery Remains Fragile [MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidö government's Spring Budget 2026 (HD03100 [riksdagen.se]) projects recovery, but the explicit acknowledgement in HC01FiU20 [riksdagen.se] that lågkonjunktur is "more prolonged than expected" indicates the government is managing downside scenarios rather than celebrating growth. <strong>We assess with MEDIUM confidence that Q1 2026 GDP data will show growth between 0% and 0.5% — insufficient to validate the government's recovery narrative but not catastrophic.</strong> The risk of negative Q1 GDP is estimated at 15–20% given external trade headwinds.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>
 PIR: PIR-1 (Q1 GDP data release date, expected May 2026)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 — Tidö Coalition Will Remain Intact Through September Election [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 — Tidö Coalition Will Remain Intact Through September Election [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Despite fiscal pressure and opposition attacks, <strong>we assess with HIGH confidence that the Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L) will not fracture before the September 2026 election.</strong> SD has a strong electoral incentive to remain associated with the government's law-and-order delivery (HD03237, HD03246 [riksdagen.se]). M/KD/L have no viable alternative coalition partner. The emergency relief budget (HD03236) is a concession designed precisely to manage SD demands. The marginal risk is SD abstention on specific votes, not a confidence crisis.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>HIGH</strong>
 PIR: PIR-3 (SD official position on Vårpropositionen framework)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence">Key Judgment 3 — Energy Legislative Package Will Pass With Minor Amendments [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence">Key Judgment 3 — Energy Legislative Package Will Pass With Minor Amendments [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The electricity system law (HD03240 [riksdagen.se]) and wind power municipality revenue law (HD03239 [riksdagen.se]) reflect a rare area of broad cross-party support (M, SD, C, L, and conditionally MP). <strong>We assess with HIGH confidence that both will pass the Riksdag before the summer recess</strong>, with possible amendments requiring higher transparency on revenue distribution mechanisms. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) is more contentious and may face one-year implementation delay.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>HIGH</strong>
 PIR: PIR-4 (Environmental review authority legal challenges, Länsstyrelse response)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence">Key Judgment 4 — Ukraine International Legal Instruments Will Achieve Near-Unanimous Ratification [VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence">Key Judgment 4 — Ukraine International Legal Instruments Will Achieve Near-Unanimous Ratification [VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's accession to the special tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine (HD03231 [riksdagen.se]) and the international compensation commission (HD03232 [riksdagen.se]) enjoy support across all eight Riksdag parties. <strong>We assess with VERY HIGH confidence that both propositions will be ratified in May 2026</strong> with near-unanimous votes (expected &#x3C;5 Nej votes from isolated exceptions).</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence">Key Judgment 5 — Government's Election Messaging Will Emphasise Security and Rule of Law [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence">Key Judgment 5 — Government's Election Messaging Will Emphasise Security and Rule of Law [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The concentration of justice reform propositions (HD03237, HD03246, HD03252 [riksdagen.se]) in the final pre-election legislative sprint confirms that M/KD leads are prioritising their mandate-delivery narrative on safety and rule of law. <strong>We assess with HIGH confidence that the government's formal election campaign will lead with the crime/justice agenda, with the economic recovery as a secondary but essential supporting theme.</strong> This reflects internal polling awareness that the government's weakest ground is the economy.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>HIGH</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Basis</th><th>Sensitivity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SD remains in coalition</td><td>Electoral incentive; no viable alternative</td><td>HIGH sensitivity — assumption could fail if GDP data catastrophic</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 GDP ≥ 0%</td><td>Riksbank rate cuts taking effect; base case</td><td>MEDIUM sensitivity — key risk assumption</td></tr><tr><td>FiU committee approves HD03100</td><td>M+SD+KD majority ≥ 175 seats</td><td>LOW sensitivity — structural majority</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine treaties: cross-party consensus</td><td>Unanimous foreign policy position since 2022</td><td>VERY LOW sensitivity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements">PIR Handoff — Priority Intelligence Requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements">PIR Handoff — Priority Intelligence Requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP release (SCB, ~May 2026) — key for Scenario A/B/C determination</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: FiU committee first reading on HD03100/HD03236 — expected second week of May</li>
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements">PIR Handoff — Prio
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong>: First polls post-Vårpropositionen publication — electoral impact measurement</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong>: EU Commission response to HD03242 (forestry) — formal notification risk</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward">Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward">Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Carried forward from monthly-review (analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/)</strong>: The monthly review's PIR on coalition cohesion (post-SD budget demands) remains open; this assessment provides updated HIGH confidence on coalition stability.</li>
 <li><strong>Open PIR on Riksbank rate path</strong> from prior cycles: now partially resolved — KPIF stabilised at 1.9% (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]).</li>
@@ -492,16 +492,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward">Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)<
     style KJ4 fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style KJ5 fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>D</strong> (Domestic Impact): 1–10, parliamentary/electoral/societal significance</li>
 <li><strong>I</strong> (International Resonance): 1–10, EU/NATO/Nordic/global implications</li>
 <li><strong>W</strong> (Welfare Effect): 1–10, direct citizen welfare impact</li>
 <li><strong>DIW Total</strong>: weighted average (D×0.5 + I×0.2 + W×0.3)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-rankings">Priority Tier Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-rankings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance">Tier P0 — Critical National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-rankings">Priority Tier Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-rankings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance">Tier P0 — Critical National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03100 — 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</strong> [riksdagen.se]</p>
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance">Tier P0 — Critical Nationa
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p1--high-significance">Tier P1 — High Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p1--high-significance">Tier P1 — High Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-significance"></a></h4>
 <ol start="3">
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet</strong> [riksdagen.se]</p>
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-p1--high-significance">Tier P1 — High Significance<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p2--significant">Tier P2 — Significant<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--significant"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p2--significant">Tier P2 — Significant<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--significant"></a></h4>
 <ol start="8">
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03231 — Ukraine aggression tribunal</strong> [riksdagen.se]</p>
@@ -603,61 +603,61 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-p2--significant">Tier P2 — Significant<a class="" aria-hidden=
     y-axis "DIW Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [9.2, 8.9, 8.1, 7.5, 7.5, 7.2, 7.1, 6.8, 6.5]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Note</strong>: Qualitative assessment only — no systematic media corpus gathered in this run.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing">Government/Coalition Party Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-moderaterna-m">Moderaterna (M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-moderaterna-m"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing">Government/Coalition Party Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-moderaterna-m">Moderaterna (M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-moderaterna-m"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Ansvar och reform — leverans på löften" (Responsibility and reform — delivery on promises)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Will present HD03100 as proof of economic management competence</li>
 <li>Energy package (HD03240, HD03239) framed as "green competitiveness" not just "green transition"</li>
 <li>Crime laws (HD03237, HD03246) framed as "trygghet" — safety and security delivery</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd">Sverigedemokraterna (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd">Sverigedemokraterna (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Sverige först — kostnader ned, brott upp, vi levererar" (Sweden first — costs down, crime up, we deliver)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03236 (fuel tax cut) will be the primary SD-branded win</li>
 <li>Juvenile justice (HD03246) presented as SD's distinctive policy victory</li>
 <li>Will avoid taking credit for energy transition aspects (ideological tension)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-kristdemokraterna-kd">Kristdemokraterna (KD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kristdemokraterna-kd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kristdemokraterna-kd">Kristdemokraterna (KD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kristdemokraterna-kd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Familjer och trygghet" (Families and safety)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>KD will focus on HD03246 (juvenile justice) — crime/family values intersection</li>
 <li>Will present HD03237 (police education) as long-term investment in community safety</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-liberalerna-l">Liberalerna (L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-liberalerna-l"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-liberalerna-l">Liberalerna (L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-liberalerna-l"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Reformer för frihet och integration" (Reforms for freedom and integration)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Most likely to frame energy transition as EU alignment</li>
 <li>Weakest position in the sprint — will struggle to differentiate from M</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s">Socialdemokraterna (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s">Socialdemokraterna (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "För lite, för sent, för dyrt" (Too little, too late, too expensive)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Will attack HD03236 as inadequate compared to household cost pressures</li>
 <li>Will present HD03100 (spring budget) as a "budget för valvinst, inte för Sverige" (budget for electoral victory, not for Sweden)</li>
 <li>Will attack HD03238 (env authority) as weakening environmental protection</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-vänsterpartiet-v">Vänsterpartiet (V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vänsterpartiet-v"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vänsterpartiet-v">Vänsterpartiet (V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vänsterpartiet-v"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Skattelättnad för bil, ingenting för boende" (Tax cuts for cars, nothing for housing)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sharpest critique will focus on housing absence from legislative sprint</li>
 <li>Will use HD03236 to frame Tidö as "the car lobby's government"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-miljöpartiet-mp">Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-miljöpartiet-mp">Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Klimatbrott mot framtida generationer" (Climate crime against future generations)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sharpest opposition to HD03242 (forestry) and potential HD03238 weakening</li>
 <li>Will use any implementation delays in env authority as confirmation of green regression</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-centerpartiet-c">Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-centerpartiet-c">Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: Mixed — will support energy reforms (HD03239/HD03240) while attacking fiscal framework</p>
 <ul>
 <li>C is internally divided on supporting Tidö energy policies; rural wing supports HD03239</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation">Press Coverage Predicted Polarisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation">Press Coverage Predicted Polarisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     SvD["Svenska Dagbladet\n(pro-reform)"] --> Gov
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation">Press Coverage Predicted Polar
     style Gov fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style Opp fill:#ff006e,color:#fff
     style Mixed fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking">Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking">Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -703,9 +703,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking">Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Expected framing shift</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>May 2026 week 1</td><td>FiU first reading HD03100</td><td>Economic competence debate begins</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026 week 2</td><td>Q1 GDP release</td><td>Frame shifts dramatically based on result</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026 week 3</td><td>BRÅ crime statistics</td><td>Crime narrative frame intensifies</td></tr><tr><td>June 2026</td><td>Riksdag summer recess</td><td>Campaign mode begins formally</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Lens</strong>: 6-Dimension Stakeholder Matrix</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-influence-network">Stakeholder Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-influence-network">Stakeholder Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     A["Government\n(Kristersson/Svantesson)"] --> B["FiU Committee\n(M/SD/KD majority)"]
@@ -721,8 +721,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-influence-network">Stakeholder Influence Network<a class=
     style D fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style E fill:#ff006e,color:#fff
     style K fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition">Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition">Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: PM Ulf Kristersson (M), Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M), Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M), Energy/Climate: Lotta Edholm/Johan Britz (KD/M)</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Deliver visible reforms before September election; maintain coalition coherence; manage economic narrative</li>
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition">Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalitio
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: HIGH (government controls legislative agenda via Riksdag majority)</li>
 <li><strong>Source</strong>: HD03100, HD03237, HD03246 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c">Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c">Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: S party leader (parliamentary opposition), V (Nooshi Dadgostar), MP leadership, C (Muharrem Demirok)</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Maximise opposition visibility; frame government as incompetent economic manager</li>
@@ -738,28 +738,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c">Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class=
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM (132 seats; cannot block with votes but strong media/committee presence)</li>
 <li><strong>Source</strong>: HC01FiU20 opposition positions [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-businessindustry">Lens 3: Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-businessindustry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-businessindustry">Lens 3: Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-businessindustry"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: Svenskt Näringsliv, Energiföretagen Sverige, Skogsindustrierna, banking sector (EU bankpaket HD03253)</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Predictable regulatory environment; energy cost competitiveness; fast permitting (HD03238)</li>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Broadly supportive of deregulation package; concerns about new environmental authority's operational readiness</li>
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (economic feedback loops; employer associations inform FiU)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society">Lens 4: Labour/Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society">Lens 4: Labour/Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: LO (blue-collar), TCO (white-collar), SACO (academic), BRIS, Civil Rights Defenders, Naturskyddsföreningen</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: LO — real wage recovery; BRIS — juvenile justice rights; Naturskyddsföreningen — HD03238/HD03242 opposition</li>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: LO cautious on spring budget adequacy; BRIS opposes HD03246; Naturskyddsföreningen ready to challenge HD03238</li>
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM (civil society litigation capacity; LO's voter bloc signal to S)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-internationaleu">Lens 5: International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-internationaleu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-internationaleu">Lens 5: International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-internationaleu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: European Commission (EU Banking Package HD03253, EIA Directive HD03238), CoE (ECHR HD03246), ICC/UN (Ukraine tribunals HD03231/232), NATO allies</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Swedish compliance with EU directives; rule-of-law standards; Ukraine accountability participation</li>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Supportive on Ukraine; monitoring HD03238 for EIA compliance; neutral on domestic fiscal measures</li>
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH on regulatory compliance; LOW on domestic politics</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy">Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy">Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: Governor (vacant replacement post-Thedéen term?), executive board</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: KPIF stability at 2% target; ECB coordination; exchange rate stability</li>
@@ -768,8 +768,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy">Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)<a
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HC01FiU24 FiU evaluation of Riksbankens penningpolitik 2024 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Riksdag scheduling of HD03100 first reading</td><td>riksdagen.se/kalender</td><td>HIGH</td><td>FiU committee vote timing confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>SD leadership public comment on Vårpropositionen</td><td>SD press office</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Confirms PIR-3 (coalition signal)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>M party spokesperson statement on economic narrative</td><td>M press office</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Sets framing for media cycle</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Environmental NGO (Naturskyddsföreningen) response to HD03238</td><td>NGO press release</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Early legal challenge signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02">One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02">One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02">One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5</td><td>FiU committee scheduling HD03100 (Vårpropositionen)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition management signal</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Opposition (S) press conference on spring budget</td><td>S press office</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Attack line formation</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Sifo/Novus tracking poll release</td><td>Sifo/Novus</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Electoral impact of legislative sprint</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Riksbank advance communication pre-May meeting</td><td>riksbank.se</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Interest rate trajectory</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>SiS (Statens institutionsstyrelse) response to HD03246</td><td>SiS press office</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Juvenile justice implementation signal</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03231/232 committee scheduling (UtU)</td><td>riksdagen.se/utskott</td><td>LOW</td><td>Ukraine ratification timeline confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25">One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25">One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25">One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11</td><td>Q1 2026 GDP release (SCB)</td><td>SCB.se</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Scenario A/B/C determination (PIR-1)</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Riksbank May monetary policy meeting decision</td><td>riksbank.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Rate cut or hold signals fiscal space</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>BRÅ crime statistics release (if scheduled May)</td><td>bra.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Crime narrative validation</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>KD/L party congress statements</td><td>Party websites</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Threshold-party survival signals</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>Environmental review authority NGO court filing</td><td>Administrative court</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>PIR-4 confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>Riksdag final vote HD03100 (Vårpropositionen)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition majority confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-horizon-september-2026">Election Horizon (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-september-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-horizon-september-2026">Election Horizon (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-september-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-horizon-september-2026">Election Horizon (September 2026)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>17</td><td>Q2 2026 GDP growth rate</td><td>SCB.se</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Recovery narrative validation</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>Unemployment rate trajectory (Aug 2026)</td><td>SCB.se/Arbetsförmedlingen</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Economic anxiety level</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>Final Sifo pre-election poll</td><td>Sifo</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Seat projection update</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>KD and L final poll numbers vs 4% threshold</td><td>Multiple pollsters</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Tidö continuation feasibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicators-summary-chart">Indicators Summary Chart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary-chart"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicators-summary-chart">Indicators Summary Chart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary-chart"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 timeline
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -982,11 +982,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicators-summary-chart">Indicators Summary Chart<a class="" aria-hi
         Q2 GDP : Final polls
         Unemployment : KD/L threshold</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Three scenarios are constructed for the May–June 2026 window (before summer Riksdag recess).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30">Scenario A: Economic Recovery Signal — "Soft Landing" (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30">Scenario A: Economic Recovery Signal — "Soft Landing" (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP data released in May shows modest positive growth (0.5–1.5%). Riksbanken signals a possible additional rate cut. The fuel and energy relief package (HD03236) is welcomed by households. The legislative sprint completes on schedule. The government enters summer recess with an economic credibility boost.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30">Sce
 </ul>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Unlikely</em> (20–37% probability range — Kent Scale) given accumulated recession depth</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55">Scenario B: Prolonged Stagnation — "More of the Same" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55">Scenario B: Prolonged Stagnation — "More of the Same" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP is flat (0–0.5%) or marginally positive. Recession continues but doesn't deepen significantly. The spring budget and emergency relief pass but are deemed insufficient by opposition. Legislative sprint completes for all non-contested items; forestry (HD03242) and youth justice (HD03246) face prolonged committee scrutiny. The government governs competently but without a transformative narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55">Sce
 </ul>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Roughly even</em> (45–55% probability) — most consistent with current trajectory</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15">Scenario C: Economic Deterioration — "Crisis Narrative" (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15">Scenario C: Economic Deterioration — "Crisis Narrative" (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP is negative (below -0.5%). US tariff escalation hits Swedish industrial exports in May. Riksbanken signals emergency rate cuts. The emergency relief package is judged too small by public opinion. SD makes public demands for a larger relief budget or threatens abstentions. The "crisis government" narrative takes hold.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1035,12 +1035,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15">S
 </ul>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Unlikely</em> (20–37%) but with higher-than-normal tail risk given the external trade environment</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored">Scenario D: Foreign Policy Escalation — "Ukraine Emergency" (Probability: &#x3C;5%, monitored)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored">Scenario D: Foreign Policy Escalation — "Ukraine Emergency" (Probability: &#x3C;5%, monitored)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Russia escalates hybrid warfare against Sweden following ratification of Ukraine aggression tribunal accession (HD03231). Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure; disinformation campaign; energy supply disruption. Riksdag enters emergency session.</p>
 <p><strong>This scenario is a monitored low-probability/high-impact outlier.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Remote</em> (&#x3C;7%) — but would dominate all other political dynamics</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1084,8 +1084,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
     "A: Soft Landing (30%)" : 30
     "C: Crisis Narrative (15%)" : 15</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1202,17 +1202,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Category</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01</td><td>Q1 2026 GDP contraction confirmed — undermines government recovery narrative</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>20</td><td>Economic</td><td>Pre-emptive communication; additional relief measures</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-02</td><td>SD coalition defection on fiscal framework</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>Political</td><td>Concessions on fuel relief scope; SD consultation</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-03</td><td>Environmental review authority (HD03238) faces legal challenge, delays</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Regulatory</td><td>Transitional provisions; robust legal drafting</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-04</td><td>Opposition unified campaign: "crisis government" narrative</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Electoral</td><td>Deliver visible reform wins before July recess</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-05</td><td>International trade shock (US tariffs on Swedish exports)</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>External</td><td>WTO engagement; EU trade policy coordination</td><td>[C2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-06</td><td>Youth justice reform (HD03246) ECHR challenge succeeds</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Legal</td><td>Council of Europe consultation; proportionality review</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-07</td><td>Police education reform (HD03237) implementation delay</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>Operational</td><td>Phased rollout; existing recruitment measures maintained</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-08</td><td>Forestry deregulation (HD03242) triggers EU Green Deal conflict</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>EU/Legal</td><td>Legal opinion on Natura 2000 compatibility</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-09</td><td>Energy system law (HD03240) creates market uncertainty</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Economic</td><td>Clarity in transitional rules; stakeholder consultation</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-10</td><td>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) faces non-ratification delay</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>Foreign</td><td>Cross-party whip management</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-risks-li--12">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--12"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical">R-01: Economic Narrative Collapse (L×I = 20) — CRITICAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks-li--12">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical">R-01: Economic Narrative Collapse (L×I = 20) — CRITICAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden has been in lågkonjunktur since 2023. The Riksbank cut rates in 2024, and KPIF stabilised at ~1.9% (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]). However, HD03100 [riksdagen.se] explicitly acknowledges the recession is "more prolonged than expected." If Statistics Sweden (SCB) releases Q1 2026 GDP showing negative or flat growth in May, the government's narrative of "recovery under way" — the central premise of the Spring Budget — is contradicted by data.</p>
 <p><strong>Posterior probability</strong>: ~40% that Q1 2026 GDP growth will be negative or below 0.5% [C2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16">R-03: Environmental Review Authority Legal Challenges (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16">R-03: Environmental Review Authority Legal Challenges (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p>The new authority (HD03238 [riksdagen.se]) is designed to replace multiple Länsstyrelse functions and streamline permit processing. NGOs (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF) are likely to challenge the constitutional basis of removing environmental checks from regional authorities. Administrative courts could issue injunctions.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading chain</strong>: HD03238 delay → renewable energy project delays → energy system law (HD03240) implementation gaps → Sweden's climate targets slip</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16">R-04: "Crisis Government" Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16">R-04: "Crisis Government" Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p>S, V, MP collectively hold 132 seats. With the spring budget providing cover for unified messaging, S's economic policy team (under assumed leadership) will frame every relief measure as "inadequate" and every reform as "hurried and legally fragile before the election."</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading chain</strong>: Negative economic data → opposition credibility gain → voter intention shift → SD reassessment of coalition value</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Risk Matrix: Likelihood vs Impact"
@@ -1303,9 +1303,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01 Economic narrative</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>20</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>R-03 Env authority delay</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R-04 Opposition narrative</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R-05 Trade shock</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R-08 EU forestry conflict</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-02 SD defection</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-06 ECHR challenge</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-09 Energy uncertainty</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-07 Police delay</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr><tr><td>R-10 Ukraine non-ratification</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Strong legislative mandate delivery</td><td>19+ propositions in April sprint; HD03100 [riksdagen.se], HD03237 [riksdagen.se], HD03246 [riksdagen.se] demonstrate breadth</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition stability maintained</td><td>SD, M, KD, L aligned on justice and fiscal package despite pre-election pressures</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy policy coherence</td><td>Simultaneous HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239 package shows integrated energy strategy [riksdagen.se]</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine solidarity (cross-party)</td><td>HD03231 + HD03232 [riksdagen.se] enjoy near-universal Riksdag support; Sweden's NATO/rule-of-law standing reinforced</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Police reform credibility</td><td>HD03237 [riksdagen.se] — paid police education addresses the force's staffing crisis directly</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Recession extends longer than projected</td><td>FiU betänkande HC01FiU20 [riksdagen.se]: lågkonjunktur "mer utdragen" than in Vårpropositionen</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal credibility under pressure</td><td>Emergency relief budget (HD03236) signals ad hoc reactive policy rather than structural reform</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental review reform (HD03238) risks speed-quality trade-off</td><td>New authority lacks track record; Länsstyrelse competence transfer uncertain</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Juvenile justice reform (HD03246) ECHR vulnerability</td><td>Tougher rules for under-18s may face Council of Europe scrutiny</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry deregulation (HD03242) divides Sweden's international image</td><td>Green credentials questioned by NGOs citing Natura 2000 [riksdagen.se context]</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Economic recovery narrative if Q1 GDP positive</td><td>Riksbank monetary policy evaluation (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]) suggests KPIF stabilised at ~2%; rate cuts possible</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power income gives municipalities electoral incentive</td><td>HD03239 [riksdagen.se] — local government gain from offshore/onshore wind revenue creates new rural coalition partners</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine leadership position builds NATO credibility</td><td>HD03231/HD03232 [riksdagen.se] — Sweden as early mover on accountability mechanisms</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Police reform delivers visible quick wins</td><td>HD03237 [riksdagen.se] — increased police presence measurable before September election</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q1 2026 GDP contraction data (if negative)</td><td>Extended recession forecast; FiU notes revised downward prognosis in HC01FiU20 [riksdagen.se]</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD ultimatum risk on fuel relief scope</td><td>HD03236 [riksdagen.se] may be insufficient for SD's voter base; risk of SD demanding more</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition unified economic attack</td><td>S/V/MP could frame spring package as "too little, too late" given recession depth</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental review authority implementation failure</td><td>HD03238 [riksdagen.se] — tight timeline to establish new authority by 2027; legal challenges from NGOs likely</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>International trade risk (US tariffs)</td><td>Global trade uncertainty (WEO Apr-2026 context) affects Swedish export-dependent industries</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[C2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th><strong>Strengths</strong></th><th><strong>Weaknesses</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Deploy Ukraine leadership to reinforce security credibility before election; use police reform delivery as election-season visible win</td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Use energy package (HD03240/239) to counter recession weakness; frame environmental reform as pro-growth</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Strong legislative sprint insulates against single-issue opposition attacks; coalition breadth provides buffer against SD ultimatums</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: Economic weakness + fiscal ad-hoc measures + extended recession = narrative crisis if Q1 GDP is negative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression">Cross-SWOT Theme: Election Countdown Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression">Cross-SWOT Theme: Election Countdown Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression"></a></h3>
 <p>All SWOT elements are compressed by the 5-month election countdown. Strengths must translate to voter perception before September 2026. Weaknesses — especially the economic data — are existential if Q1 2026 shows no recovery. The window for corrective action closes in July (Riksdag summer recess).</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
@@ -1514,9 +1514,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression">Cross-SWOT Theme: El
     "Fiscal Credibility": [0.20, 0.25]
     "SD Ultimatum Risk": [0.68, 0.20]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-1-electoral-threats">Category 1: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-electoral-threats"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-1-electoral-threats">Category 1: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-electoral-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-E01</strong>: Opposition "crisis economy" attack campaign</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: Unified S/V/MP messaging on economic failure</li>
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-1-electoral-threats">Category 1: Electoral Threats<a class="
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH</li>
 <li>Source: HD03236 scope (fuel tax cut — magnitude unknown without full text) [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats">Category 2: Institutional/Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats">Category 2: Institutional/Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-L01</strong>: Constitutional Court/Administrative Court challenge to HD03238 (Environmental Review Authority)</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: NGO coalition (Naturskyddsföreningen, ClientEarth, WWF Sweden) seeking injunction</li>
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats">Category 2: Institutional/Lega
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: MEDIUM (long-term)</li>
 <li>Source: HD03246 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats">Category 3: Economic/External Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats">Category 3: Economic/External Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-X01</strong>: US tariff escalation on Swedish manufactured goods</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: WTO-incompatible tariffs on Swedish automotive, steel, pharmaceutical exports</li>
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats">Category 3: Economic/External Th
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH</li>
 <li>Source: HD03231 [riksdagen.se]; Sweden's NATO status (2024)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-category-4-coalition-threats">Category 4: Coalition Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-coalition-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-4-coalition-threats">Category 4: Coalition Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-coalition-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-C01</strong>: SD threatens to vote against Vårproposition if fuel relief insufficient</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: SD leadership signals insufficient cost-of-living support; demands more</li>
@@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-4-coalition-threats">Category 4: Coalition Threats<a class="
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH (but low probability given election proximity — SD also benefits from Tidö success)</li>
 <li>Source: Tidö coalition structure; HD03236 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario">Attack Tree: Coalition Collapse Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario">Attack Tree: Coalition Collapse Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     ROOT["🔴 Government Crisis\n(5+ months pre-election)"]
@@ -1596,23 +1596,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario">Attack Tree: Coalition Colla
     style B fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style C fill:#ff006e,color:#fff
     style F fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-summary">Intelligence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-summary">Intelligence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The most credible threat combination is: <strong>economic data shock (T-X01/T-E01) + opposition narrative exploitation (T-E01)</strong> creating a "lame duck" perception of the government in its final legislative months. This is not likely to trigger coalition collapse (SD has no electoral incentive to destabilise before September), but it could significantly damage the government's vote share and undermine mandate-continuity arguments.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L3 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2026 Spring Budget (Ekonomisk vårproposition) is the government's primary macroeconomic policy statement before the September 2026 election. It establishes the fiscal framework, growth projections, and spending priorities for 2026–2030.</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03100/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03100/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 10/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 10/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1"></a></h3>
 <p>This is the highest-significance document of the legislative sprint. It defines the government's economic record and campaign narrative. The Vårpropositionen is:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>The primary tool for framing "economic recovery" as a government achievement</li>
 <li>The fiscal foundation upon which HD03236 (emergency relief) and HD0399 (spring amendment) layer</li>
 <li>The document that opposition parties (S) will attack most vigorously</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>GDP growth forecast 2026: ~1.5% (recovering from lågkonjunktur)</li>
 <li>Inflation projection: ~2.0% (aligned with Riksbank target)</li>
@@ -1620,151 +1620,151 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Structural surplus: Budget balance target maintained</li>
 <li>Defence spending: Continued increase to NATO 2% target</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-risk">Legislative Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-risk">Legislative Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-risk"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Must pass FiU committee first reading (expected 2026-05-06)</li>
 <li>Coalition vote: M+SD+KD+L = 176 seats (1 seat majority)</li>
 <li>Risk of SD demanding amendments to fiscal relief component before final vote</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03100 is the PIR-1 anchor: if Q1 GDP release (SCB, May 2026) confirms ≥1.5% growth, the Vårpropositionen narrative holds. If GDP is negative, the document becomes the government's primary vulnerability.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03231 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03231/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03231/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-1">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-1">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-1"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03236 | <strong>Type</strong>: Ändringsbudget | <strong>Level</strong>: L3 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>An extra ändringsbudget providing emergency cost-of-living relief via fuel tax reductions and electricity/gas price support for households and businesses.</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03236/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03236/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 9/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 9/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1"></a></h3>
 <p>This is the most politically contentious fiscal document in the sprint. Its use of the extra ändringsbudget instrument signals urgency and executive action. It is the primary visible concession to SD's cost-of-living demands.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-2">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-2">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Reduced drivmedelsskatt (fuel excise) estimated at 0.50–1.00 SEK/litre</li>
 <li>Electricity price support for households above a consumption threshold</li>
 <li>Gas price relief mechanism</li>
 <li>Total estimated fiscal cost: 5–8 billion SEK (based on typical relief scope)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The H3 hypothesis (SD ultimatum) in devils-advocate.md finds its primary support in this document. The extraordinary use of an extra ändringsbudget for what is essentially a routine relief measure suggests a political forcing event.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03237">HD03237<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03237"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03237-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03237 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03237/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03237/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-3">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-3">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-3"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-1">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-1">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03238">HD03238<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03238"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03238 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03238/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03238/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-4">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-4">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-4"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-2">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-2">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03239">HD03239<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03239"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03239 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03239/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03239/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-5">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-5">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-5"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-3">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-3">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03240 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2+ | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Comprehensive legislation restructuring the Swedish electricity grid regulatory framework, including new balancing rules, consumer rights, and grid capacity planning mandates.</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03240/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03240/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2">Political Significance [DIW: 8/10 | Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2">Political Significance [DIW: 8/10 | Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2"></a></h3>
 <p>Part of the integrated energy reform trilogy (HD03238+HD03239+HD03240). The broadest cross-party support among all three — even V and MP are likely to support or abstain. Aligns with EU electricity market reform agenda.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-6">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-6">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>New balancing mechanism requirements for grid operators</li>
 <li>Enhanced consumer rights for commercial electricity buyers</li>
 <li>Long-term grid capacity planning obligation for Svenska kraftnät</li>
 <li>Smart meter data access standards</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710">Implementation Feasibility [Score: 7/10]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710">Implementation Feasibility [Score: 7/10]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710"></a></h3>
 <p>Svenska kraftnät has existing capacity. Primary risk is industry consultation phase extending timelines.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03246"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03246 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03246/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03246/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-7">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-7">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-7"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-4">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-4">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-cluster-remaining">cluster-remaining<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-remaining"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Cluster</strong>: HD03242, HD03232, HD03233, HD03234, HD03243, HD03244, HD03245, HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD0399, HD03104</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-overview">Cluster Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-overview">Cluster Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>These 12 documents complement the 8 top-priority propositions analyzed individually. They are grouped by policy domain.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation">Sub-cluster A: International Law &#x26; Cooperation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation">Sub-cluster A: International Law &#x26; Cooperation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03232</strong> — Ukraine international compensation commission (companion to HD03231 tribunal accession)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03233</strong> — International treaty measure (companion)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03234</strong> — Europol protocol — Swedish participation in enhanced enforcement cooperation</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: All three have near-unanimous Riksdag support. HD03232 and HD03231 form an integrated Ukraine accountability framework. See coalition-mathematics.md for voting pattern.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice">Sub-cluster B: Criminal Justice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice">Sub-cluster B: Criminal Justice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03252</strong> — Detention conditions reform (SiS capacity + EU compliance)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03253</strong> — Court process reform — companion to juvenile justice package (HD03246)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03245</strong> — Criminal sanction reform</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: These three form the secondary layer of the "rule of law sprint" (see cross-reference-map.md). They add depth to the M/SD/KD electoral narrative on safety.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use">Sub-cluster C: Environment &#x26; Land Use<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use">Sub-cluster C: Environment &#x26; Land Use<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03242</strong> — Forestry regulation reform (EU deforestation regulation compatibility)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03243</strong> — Land management reform</li>
 <li><strong>HD03244</strong> — Rural property rights</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: HD03242 is the most contentious in this cluster — faces EU Commission compatibility scrutiny under the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). Risk of formal EU notification.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms">Sub-cluster D: Budget Mechanisms<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms">Sub-cluster D: Budget Mechanisms<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD0399</strong> — Spring amendment budget (riksmöte 2025/26 formal vehicle)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03104</strong> — Supplementary budget mechanism</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Fiscal implementation vehicles for HD03100/HD03236 policy objectives. High procedural significance, low political drama.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous">Sub-cluster E: Miscellaneous<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous">Sub-cluster E: Miscellaneous<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03256</strong> — Administrative reform (Statskontoret delegation area)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Low political visibility; implementation efficiency in government operations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>[B2] for all documents in this cluster — secondary legislative significance confirmed by riksdagen.se publication dates and cross-committee referral patterns.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Election</strong>: Sweden General Election, September 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run">Current Seat Projections (2026-Q1 estimates; no new polling in this run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run">Current Seat Projections (2026-Q1 estimates; no new polling in this run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run"></a></h3>
 <p>Based on polling through Q1 2026 (Novus/Sifo tracking, most recent available):</p>
 
 
@@ -1844,14 +1844,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>2022 Seats</th><th>Q1 2026 Polling Est.</th><th>Change</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Socialdemokraterna (S)</td><td>107</td><td>~112</td><td>+5</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>73</td><td>~68</td><td>-5</td><td>Tidö support</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>68</td><td>~66</td><td>-2</td><td>Tidö core</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>24</td><td>~26</td><td>+2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>24</td><td>~27</td><td>+3</td><td>Swing/Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>19</td><td>~17</td><td>-2</td><td>Tidö core</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD) [above]</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Liberalerna (L)</td><td>16</td><td>~14</td><td>-2</td><td>Tidö core</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>18</td><td>~19</td><td>+1</td><td>Opposition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Bloc estimate</strong>: Tidö (M+SD+KD+L): ~165 seats | S-bloc (S+V+MP+C): ~184 seats
 <strong>Threshold concerns</strong>: KD (17) and L (14) both approaching 4% threshold</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026">Key Electoral Variables for May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026">Key Electoral Variables for May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Q1 GDP release</strong> (PIR-1): If ≥ 0%, reduces S-bloc economic advantage by ~3pp</li>
 <li><strong>Crime statistics</strong> (May 2026 BRÅ release): Tidö's strongest electoral ground</li>
 <li><strong>Energy prices</strong> (electricity spot price trajectory): Direct voter sentiment impact</li>
 <li><strong>SD moderation signals</strong>: SD may make tactical moderation moves to attract centre-right swing voters</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election">Coalition Formation Scenarios Post-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election">Coalition Formation Scenarios Post-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1895,9 +1895,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election">Coalition Formation Scen
     "Hung parliament" : 10
     "C joins Tidö" : 5</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Riksdag</strong>: 349 seats | <strong>Majority threshold</strong>: 175</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate">Current Tidö Vote Distribution (2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate">Current Tidö Vote Distribution (2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1934,7 +1934,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate">Current Tidö Vote Dist
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Coalition role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>Core — PM</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>Support — budget negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>Core</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>Core</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td>1 seat majority</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution">May 2026 Legislative Votes — Expected Ja/Nej Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution">May 2026 Legislative Votes — Expected Ja/Nej Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution">May 2026 Leg
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Proposition</th><th>M</th><th>SD</th><th>KD</th><th>L</th><th>S</th><th>V</th><th>MP</th><th>C</th><th>Expected outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100 Vårpropositionen</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Abstains</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236 Emergency budget</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Abstains</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 Electricity</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (≥190 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239 Wind revenue</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Abstains</td><td>Nej</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (≥185 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237 Police education</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Abstains</td><td>Abstains</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (≥200 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 Juvenile justice</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 Ukraine tribunal</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td><strong>Near-unanimous</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03238 Env authority</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: Seat counts are 2022 election values. Frånvarande/abstention patterns typical; effective majority may differ. C party position on HD03239 (wind revenue) is assumed supportive based on rural energy interests but not formally confirmed.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis">Threshold Vulnerability Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis">Threshold Vulnerability Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Tidö Coalition: Vote Margin per Key Vote"
@@ -2059,8 +2059,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis">Threshold Vulnerability Analysis<a
     bar [1, 1, 15, 25, 60, 1]</pre>
 <p><strong>Critical observation</strong>: Four of the eight key May votes have a projected margin of just 1 seat (176 seats = threshold 175 + 1). A single MP absence or SD rebellion on any of these votes creates a forced revote. This is the primary legislative risk for May 2026.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint">Key Segments Relevant to Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint">Key Segments Relevant to Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2123,9 +2123,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint">Key Segments Relevant to
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size est.</th><th>Current alignment</th><th>Policy driver</th><th>Legislative response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Southern Sweden working class</td><td>~12%</td><td>SD lean</td><td>Cost of living, fuel</td><td>HD03236 (fuel relief)</td></tr><tr><td>Urban knowledge workers</td><td>~18%</td><td>S+MP lean</td><td>Climate, housing</td><td>HD03238 (env authority) — negative reaction likely</td></tr><tr><td>Rural energy communities</td><td>~6%</td><td>M/C</td><td>Energy prices, wind revenue</td><td>HD03239 (wind municipality revenue)</td></tr><tr><td>Security-concerned suburban</td><td>~15%</td><td>M+SD</td><td>Crime, juvenile justice</td><td>HD03237, HD03246</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic solidarity left</td><td>~8%</td><td>S+V+MP</td><td>Ukraine, rule of law</td><td>HD03231/232 (Ukraine)</td></tr><tr><td>SME entrepreneurs</td><td>~7%</td><td>M</td><td>Business regulation, energy costs</td><td>HD03240 (electricity)</td></tr><tr><td>Young voters 18–29</td><td>~10%</td><td>S+MP</td><td>Climate, housing, jobs</td><td>No direct legislative response in this sprint</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging">Implications for May–August Campaign Messaging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging">Implications for May–August Campaign Messaging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging"></a></h3>
 <p>The legislative sprint targets the Southern working class (HD03236), security-concerned suburban (HD03237/HD03246), and rural energy (HD03239) segments most precisely. The young voter segment (10%) is notably absent from the legislative priorities — a structural gap that could become a S/MP attack surface.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 pie title Voter Segment Targeting Reach
     "Southern working class (SD)" : 12
@@ -2134,11 +2134,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     "SME (M)" : 7
     "Untargeted segments" : 60</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Nordic peers (Denmark, Norway, Finland) + Germany + UK (post-Labour)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-framework">Outside-In Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-framework">Outside-In Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's current political-economic positioning is assessed against comparable democratic governance systems facing similar structural pressures.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2188,27 +2188,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>GDP Growth 2025</th><th>Election Context</th><th>Policy Parallelism</th><th>Key Divergence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden (SWE)</strong></td><td>~+1.0% (2025 est.)</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Baseline</td><td>Recession longer than peers</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark (DNK)</strong></td><td>~+2.2%</td><td>No near-term election</td><td>Energy transition advanced</td><td>Higher wage growth</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway (NOR)</strong></td><td>~+1.8%</td><td>No near-term election</td><td>Oil fund buffers shocks</td><td>No structural reform pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland (FIN)</strong></td><td>~-0.5% (2024)→ recovery</td><td>2027 election horizon</td><td>Fiscal consolidation similar</td><td>NATO neighbour parallel on Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany (DEU)</strong></td><td>~-0.2% (2025)→ stagnation</td><td>Post-2025 Bundestag coalition</td><td>Energy reform comparison</td><td>Coalition complexity comparable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: GDP figures are approximate based on IMF WEO Apr-2026 context. Admiralty [C2] for cross-country estimates.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-comparator-profiles">Detailed Comparator Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-comparator-profiles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform">Denmark — Model for Pre-Election Energy Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-comparator-profiles">Detailed Comparator Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-comparator-profiles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform">Denmark — Model for Pre-Election Energy Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark's revenue-sharing model for offshore wind (Havmøllefond) predates Sweden's HD03239 by six years. Danish municipalities hosting offshore wind receive substantial fiscal compensation, with studies showing ~30% local approval increase. Sweden's HD03239 adopts a similar principle but focuses on onshore revenue sharing. <strong>Lesson</strong>: Denmark's early adoption shows the policy works at reducing local opposition; Sweden's implementation timing (pre-election) accelerates the political benefit timeline.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative">Finland — Parallel Fiscal Austerity Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative">Finland — Parallel Fiscal Austerity Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p>Finland entered fiscal consolidation in 2024 under PM Orpo (Kokoomus-led coalition), implementing spending cuts and tax increases. Sweden's Tidö government has avoided Finnish-scale austerity, but both face the same political challenge: structural deficits require consolidation while recession constrains household spending. Finland's experience shows that consolidation with strong rule-of-law reform can maintain coalition stability. <strong>Sweden comparison</strong>: Sweden's spring budget is less austere than Finland's; the political risk is lower but the long-term fiscal trajectory raises similar questions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison">Germany — Environmental Permitting Reform Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison">Germany — Environmental Permitting Reform Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's Bundesimmissionsschutzgesetz (BImSchG) reform (2023) and the establishment of the Bundesnetzagentur's new fast-track permitting function parallels Sweden's HD03238 (new environmental review authority). Germany achieved a 40% reduction in wind energy permit processing time (18→11 months average) within two years of institutional reform. <strong>Sweden comparison</strong>: HD03238 targets similar efficiency gains. Germany's implementation shows a 12–18 month lag before measurable improvement — Sweden's new authority is unlikely to show results before the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery">UK (post-Labour 2024) — Crime-Focused Pre-Election Delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery">UK (post-Labour 2024) — Crime-Focused Pre-Election Delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery"></a></h4>
 <p>Labour's 2024 manifesto focused on "neighbourhood policing" and justice system reform. Sweden's HD03237 (paid police education) parallels UK's recruitment-first police strategy, though Sweden's approach is more structured. The UK experience shows that police reform announcements have a 6–12 month lag before voter impact. Sweden's announcement in April 2026 may not translate to voter perception change before September.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy">Nordic Horizontal Comparison: Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy">Nordic Horizontal Comparison: Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Nordic Energy Reform Progress Index (0-10)"
     x-axis ["Sweden 2026", "Denmark 2026", "Norway 2026", "Finland 2026"]
     y-axis "Reform Progress" 0 --> 10
     bar [6.5, 9.2, 7.8, 5.5]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-analytical-finding">Key Analytical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-analytical-finding"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-analytical-finding">Key Analytical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-analytical-finding"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden is neither the Nordic leader nor the laggard in this pre-election reform sprint. It is executing a broadly coherent centre-right reform agenda under greater political time pressure (imminent election) than comparable Nordic governments. The primary distinguishing feature is the co-occurrence of economic fragility and legislative ambition — a combination that creates higher delivery risk than in Denmark or Norway.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010">Primary Parallel: Reinfeldt Alliance Government Spring Sprint 2010<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010">Primary Parallel: Reinfeldt Alliance Government Spring Sprint 2010<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: April–June 2010 | <strong>Similarity score</strong>: 78/100</p>
 <p><strong>Conditions in 2010</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010">Pr
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: In 2010, the Alliance ran on a completed record of economic recovery (GDP +6.6% 2010). In 2026, Tidö is running on a <em>projected</em> recovery with actual GDP still uncertain. This makes 2026 riskier electorally than 2010.</p>
 <p><strong>2010 outcome</strong>: Alliance won the September 2010 election. GDP performance was the decisive factor. The pre-election legislative sprint signalled competence without producing headline-making reforms.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: The model works if GDP data cooperates. If Q1 2026 GDP is negative, the 2010 parallel breaks down and the relevant parallel shifts to Persson 2006 (see below).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case">Secondary Parallel: Persson Social Democrat Government 2006 (Failure Case)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case">Secondary Parallel: Persson Social Democrat Government 2006 (Failure Case)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: Spring 2006 | <strong>Similarity score</strong>: 42/100</p>
 <p><strong>Conditions in 2006</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2240,7 +2240,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-ca
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Outcome</strong>: Alliance won. The legislative sprint did not save the government. The macroeconomic record was the dominant factor.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: If the unemployment rate (currently ~8–9%) does not show measurable decline before September, the Persson 2006 parallel becomes more relevant than the Reinfeldt 2010 parallel.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk">Tertiary Parallel: Reinfeldt Government 2014 (Narrow Majority Risk)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk">Tertiary Parallel: Reinfeldt Government 2014 (Narrow Majority Risk)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2013–2014 | <strong>Similarity score</strong>: 55/100</p>
 <p><strong>Conditions in 2014</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2256,9 +2256,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk">Ter
     y-axis "Similarity Score" 0 --> 100
     bar [78, 55, 42]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment">High-Priority Reform Feasibility Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority">1. HD03238 — New Environmental Review Authority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment">High-Priority Reform Feasibility Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority">1. HD03238 — New Environmental Review Authority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: HIGH delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority">1. HD03238 — New Env
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Institutional capacity</td><td>Requires new Länsstyrelse coordination structure; ~200 FTE estimated</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Law proposed for 2026; implementation likely 2027</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>Naturskyddsföreningen court challenge expected (PIR-4)</td></tr><tr><td>Budget allocation</td><td>Not explicitly specified in HD03238 text</td></tr><tr><td>EU compatibility</td><td>Must comply with EIA Directive 2011/92/EU</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 4/10 for 2026 delivery, 7/10 for 2027 implementation
 <strong>Key constraint</strong>: Institution-building cannot be accelerated beyond recruitment capacity</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws">2. HD03240 — Electricity System Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws">2. HD03240 — Electricity System Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: MEDIUM delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws">2. HD03240 — Electricity System
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Regulatory authority</td><td>Svenska kraftnät has existing capacity</td></tr><tr><td>Technical complexity</td><td>Grid balancing rules require industry consultation</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Proposed implementation Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>Low — cross-party support reduces challenge probability</td></tr><tr><td>Budget allocation</td><td>Primarily regulatory framework; limited new budget</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 7/10 for 2027 delivery
 <strong>Key constraint</strong>: Industry stakeholder alignment (Energiföretagen, Vattenfall) required for implementation rules</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education">3. HD03237 — Paid Police Education<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education">3. HD03237 — Paid Police Education<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: LOW delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education">3. HD03237 — Paid Police Educatio
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Institutional capacity</td><td>Polisutbildning already has infrastructure</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Proposed implementation Q1 2027</td></tr><tr><td>Budget</td><td>HC01FiU24 includes education budget allocation</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>None expected</td></tr><tr><td>Recruitment capacity</td><td>Primary constraint — Polishögskolan has limited throughput</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 8/10 for 2027 delivery
 <strong>Key constraint</strong>: Physical capacity of Polishögskolan campuses; may require new facility investment</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing">4. HD03239 — Wind Revenue Municipality Sharing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing">4. HD03239 — Wind Revenue Municipality Sharing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: LOW-MEDIUM delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2393,7 +2393,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing">4. HD03239 — Wind Rev
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Technical complexity</td><td>Revenue calculation mechanism requires SKV (Skatteverket) implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Proposed 2027 revenue sharing from 2026 installations</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder buy-in</td><td>Municipal association (SKL) broadly supportive</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>Low — revenue sharing models have precedent</td></tr><tr><td>Retroactivity risk</td><td>Only forward-looking; no retroactive claims</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 7/10</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform">5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform">5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: MEDIUM delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2433,11 +2433,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform">5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice R
     y-axis "Feasibility" 0 --> 10
     bar [4, 7, 8, 7, 6]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Three primary competing hypotheses are evaluated against the evidence base.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view">Hypothesis H1: The Legislative Sprint Is Genuine Governance Reform (Mainstream View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view">Hypothesis H1: The Legislative Sprint Is Genuine Governance Reform (Mainstream View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The April 2026 legislative package represents coherent policy delivery — a government executing its mandate across multiple domains with genuine long-term reform intent, not merely election positioning.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mai
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH diagnostic</strong>: H1 is partially true — technical reforms (energy, environmental) are genuine; fiscal relief measures are election-motivated. H1 scores 6/10 as a complete explanation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view">Hypothesis H2: The Government Is in Pre-Election Panic Mode (Alternative View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view">Hypothesis H2: The Government Is in Pre-Election Panic Mode (Alternative View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The legislative sprint reflects internal awareness that the government's economic record is weak and voters are dissatisfied, prompting a rush of visible deliverables before the summer recess closes the window for action.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2470,7 +2470,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternativ
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH diagnostic</strong>: H2 explains the timing anomalies better than H1 but overstates the panic element. H2 scores 7.5/10 as a complete explanation. <strong>Most likely: H2 is correct on fiscal measures; H1 is correct on structural reforms.</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team">Hypothesis H3: The Coalition Is Managing a Silent SD Ultimatum (Red Team)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team">Hypothesis H3: The Coalition Is Managing a Silent SD Ultimatum (Red Team)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The emergency fuel/energy relief budget (HD03236) is a direct response to an SD ultimatum delivered in private — SD signalled it would abstain on the spring budget framework unless household cost relief was accelerated.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2487,7 +2487,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-tea
 <p><strong>ACH diagnostic</strong>: H3 is unprovable but plausible. If true, it is the most important intelligence finding of this cycle — it suggests the Tidö coalition is more fragile than its outward unity suggests. H3 scores 5/10 certainty but HIGH consequence if confirmed.</p>
 <p><strong>Red Team challenge</strong>: Assume H3 is true. What does this mean? It means SD has already exercised budget leverage once. The probability of a second SD demand increases. The fiscal cost of coalition maintenance rises. The government's macro-fiscal credibility is directly traded against coalition survival.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-hypotheses">Rejected Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-hypotheses">Rejected Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>H4 (Government will call early election)</strong>: Rejected. No constitutional basis; election is September 2026 by schedule; no party has incentive for early call.</li>
 <li><strong>H5 (Ukraine propositions will fail)</strong>: Rejected. Cross-party consensus confirmed; H5 score 1/10.</li>
@@ -2502,9 +2502,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-rejected-hypotheses">Rejected Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     style H3 fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style C fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-framework">7-Dimension Classification Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-1-policy-domain">Dimension 1: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-policy-domain"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-framework">7-Dimension Classification Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-1-policy-domain">Dimension 1: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-policy-domain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: Economic/Fiscal Policy (HD03100, HD03236, HD0399, HD03253)</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary</strong>: Criminal Justice (HD03246, HD03237, HD03252)</li>
@@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-1-policy-domain">Dimension 1: Policy Domain<a class="" aria
 <li><strong>Quaternary</strong>: Foreign/Security Policy (HD03231, HD03232)</li>
 <li><strong>Quinary</strong>: Social/Welfare (HD03245, HD03244)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-2-political-alignment">Dimension 2: Political Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-political-alignment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-2-political-alignment">Dimension 2: Political Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-political-alignment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2554,39 +2554,39 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-2-political-alignment">Dimension 2: Political Alignment<a c
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Block</th><th>Propositions Favoured</th><th>Opposition Focus</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M/KD/L (Alliansen)</td><td>Justice reform, deregulation (HD03242), fiscal framework</td><td>Fiscal sufficiency questions</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Fuel relief (HD03236), justice (HD03246, HD03237), prison restrictions (HD03252)</td><td>Any dilution of criminal justice</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Critiques inadequacy of relief; demands more welfare spending</td><td>HD03236 (not enough), HD03242 (too permissive)</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Energy support policies (HD03239, HD03240 conditionally)</td><td>HD03242 (forestry), HD03238 (too fast)</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>All relief inadequate; demand wealth redistribution</td><td>HD03252, HD03246 (rights concerns)</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Support deregulation (HD03242), rural infrastructure</td><td>Mixed on justice</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity">Dimension 3: Constitutional/Legal Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity">Dimension 3: Constitutional/Legal Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>High</strong>: HD03246 (juvenile rights, ECHR Art. 6), HD03252 (welfare state principles)</li>
 <li><strong>Medium</strong>: HD03238 (administrative law restructuring), HD03240 (electricity market regulation)</li>
 <li><strong>Low</strong>: HD03231, HD03232 (treaty accession, straightforward ratification)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance">Dimension 4: EU/International Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance">Dimension 4: EU/International Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03253 (EU Banking Package): mandatory EU transposition</li>
 <li>HD03244 (Interoperability): EU Data Act compliance</li>
 <li>HD03238 (Environmental review): EU EIA Directive implications</li>
 <li>HD03231, HD03232: UN/EU rule-of-law architecture</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election">Dimension 5: Electoral Salience (5 months to election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election">Dimension 5: Electoral Salience (5 months to election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Maximum salience</strong>: HD03236 (fuel/energy cost), HD03100 (economic direction), HD03237 (police), HD03246 (crime)</li>
 <li><strong>Moderate salience</strong>: HD03239 (rural energy), HD03238 (permitting speed), HD03242 (forestry)</li>
 <li><strong>Low salience</strong>: HD03253, HD03244, HD03256 (technical)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity">Dimension 6: Implementation Complexity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity">Dimension 6: Implementation Complexity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Complex (18+ months)</strong>: HD03238 (new authority establishment), HD03240 (electricity system overhaul)</li>
 <li><strong>Medium (6–18 months)</strong>: HD03237 (education funding system), HD03239 (revenue distribution mechanism)</li>
 <li><strong>Simple (&#x3C;6 months)</strong>: HD03236 (tax change), HD03252 (legal restriction), HD03231/232 (treaty ratification)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR/ISMS)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR/ISMS)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents: PUBLIC data [PUBLIC classification]</li>
 <li>Source: data.riksdagen.se (Offentlighetsprincipen applies)</li>
 <li>GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made; Art. 9(2)(g) substantial public interest</li>
 <li>No DPIA required; no personal data processed</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2628,14 +2628,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
     "Infrastructure" : 2
     "Technical/Regulatory" : 1</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis</strong> | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement">Sibling Analysis Folders (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement">Sibling Analysis Folders (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary sibling</strong>: <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/</code> — all 23 artifacts present; same-day companion analysis covering full April 2026 review period</li>
 <li>This month-ahead analysis MUST be read in conjunction with the monthly-review folder for a complete intelligence picture</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review">Cross-Reference with Monthly-Review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review">Cross-Reference with Monthly-Review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2672,32 +2672,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review">Cross-Reference with Monthly-Rev
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Theme</th><th>Monthly-Review Assessment</th><th>Month-Ahead Forward Projection</th><th>Convergence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Coalition stability</td><td>Assessed April-2026 coalition dynamics</td><td>SD remains in coalition through September 2026 [HIGH]</td><td>✅ Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Energy reform</td><td>April review covers legislative passage tracking</td><td>May-ahead: HD03240/HD03239 expected passage</td><td>✅ Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Economic recovery</td><td>April GDP context</td><td>Q1 GDP release is PIR-1 for May</td><td>✅ Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine instruments</td><td>April foreign policy review</td><td>HD03231/232 ratification expected May</td><td>✅ Consistent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters">Legislative Cross-Reference: Document Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain">Energy Policy Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters">Legislative Cross-Reference: Document Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain">Energy Policy Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03240 → Electricity System Laws → links to HD03239 (wind revenue) → links to HD03238 (env authority)</li>
 <li>These three form an integrated energy infrastructure reform package; amendments to one will likely affect the others</li>
 <li>See significance-scoring.md: HD03240 (DIW 9/10), HD03239 (DIW 7/10), HD03238 (DIW 6/10)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain">Security and Justice Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain">Security and Justice Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03237 (paid police education) → HD03246 (juvenile justice) → HD03252 (detention conditions)</li>
 <li>These form a "rule of law sprint" addressing the full crime-policing chain</li>
 <li>See stakeholder-perspectives.md: SD and M share leadership on this chain; KD provides credibility</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain">Budget and Fiscal Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain">Budget and Fiscal Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03100 (Vårpropositionen 2026) → HD03236 (emergency ändringsbudget) → HD0399 (spring amendment)</li>
 <li>HD03100 is the macro framework; HD03236 is the SD-facing concession layer; HD0399 provides legislative basis</li>
 <li>Fiscal coherence: these three must be read together; surface contradictions between HD03100 macro-targets and HD03236 fiscal cost</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-international-commitments-chain">International Commitments Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-commitments-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-international-commitments-chain">International Commitments Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-commitments-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03231 (Ukraine tribunal accession) → HD03232 (Ukraine compensation commission) → HD03234 (Europol protocol)</li>
 <li>Aligns Sweden's international legal posture post-NATO; all three have near-zero domestic opposition</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: monthly-review covers the diplomatic context of these commitments</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-map">Policy Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-cluster-map">Policy Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     VP["HD03100\nVårproposition"]
@@ -2724,7 +2724,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-map">Policy Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style EL fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style POL fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style UKT fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references">Analysis Artifact Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references">Analysis Artifact Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2762,55 +2762,55 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references">Analysis Artifact Cross-Reference
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Artifact</th><th>Key Link</th><th>Forward Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>executive-brief.md</td><td>BLUF cites HD03100 + HD03236</td><td>Feeds article.md headline and meta</td></tr><tr><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>Scenario B (45%) assumes Q1 GDP ≥ 0%</td><td>PIR-1 in intelligence-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>coalition-mathematics.md</td><td>Seat counts from 2022 election</td><td>Updated by election-2026-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>historical-parallels.md</td><td>Reinfeldt 2010 as best parallel</td><td>Informs risk-assessment.md Risk-3</td></tr><tr><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>All 4 quadrants cite dok_ids</td><td>Feeds significance-scoring.md ranking</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Review type</strong>: AI FIRST Pass 2 retrospective</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer">Standard 1 — Proper Disclaimer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer">Standard 1 — Proper Disclaimer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer"></a></h4>
 <p>Analytical judgments in this report reflect the analyst's assessment and do not represent official government positions. Confidence levels follow the Intelligence Community Directive 203 and Admiralty Code.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-2--source-summary">Standard 2 — Source Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2--source-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-2--source-summary">Standard 2 — Source Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2--source-summary"></a></h4>
 <p>Primary sources: Riksdagen API (riksdag-regering MCP), doktyp <code>prop</code>, riksmöte 2025/26. 20 primary legislative documents downloaded. MCP health: live. No external intelligence sources. Economic context from HC01FiU20/FiU24 [riksdagen.se] committee reports. No classified, hacked, or private data used.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-3--uncertainties">Standard 3 — Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3--uncertainties"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-3--uncertainties">Standard 3 — Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3--uncertainties"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Economic GDP trajectory: LOW confidence on precise Q1 2026 figure (no SCB release yet)</li>
 <li>SD internal deliberations: no primary source; inferred from public statements and structural incentives</li>
 <li>German/Danish comparator GDP figures: approximate, based on IMF WEO Apr-2026 context [Admiralty C2]</li>
 <li>Media framing data: no systematic media monitoring; qualitative assessment only</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence">Standard 4 — Distinguished Analysis from Intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence">Standard 4 — Distinguished Analysis from Intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence"></a></h4>
 <p>All 5 Key Judgments in intelligence-assessment.md are explicitly marked as analytical assessments, not confirmed facts. The "H3: SD Ultimatum" scenario is explicitly red-teamed and marked unprovable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-5--analyst-identity">Standard 5 — Analyst Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5--analyst-identity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-5--analyst-identity">Standard 5 — Analyst Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5--analyst-identity"></a></h4>
 <p>All analysis attributed to: James Pether Sörling, Riksdagsmonitor. No anonymous claims. AI-assisted analysis subject to human review per Hack23 AI Policy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions">Standard 6 — Analytical Assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions">Standard 6 — Analytical Assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions"></a></h4>
 <p>Explicitly documented in intelligence-assessment.md (Key Assumptions Check table). Four assumptions identified, with sensitivity ratings.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination">Standard 7 — Context for Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination">Standard 7 — Context for Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination"></a></h4>
 <p>Public intelligence product. GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)/(g) lawful basis for political opinion references. All politicians named are in public roles performing official functions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology">Standard 8 — Analytic Terminology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology">Standard 8 — Analytic Terminology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology"></a></h4>
 <p>WEP terms used: "Very likely", "Likely", "Roughly even", "Unlikely" — drawn from canon in political-style-guide.md. Admirable Code ratings [A-F][1-6] applied in evidence tables. Banned term "probable" not used.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-9--calibration">Standard 9 — Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9--calibration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-9--calibration">Standard 9 — Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9--calibration"></a></h4>
 <p>Scenario probabilities sum to 100% (25+45+20+10). Key Judgments paired with specific PIR triggers. One scenario (Scenario D, 10%) explicitly assigned as low-probability catastrophic risk.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2">Named Methodology Improvements (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth">Improvement 1 — Economic Data Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2">Named Methodology Improvements (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth">Improvement 1 — Economic Data Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: This analysis relies on HC01FiU20 committee reports for economic context rather than direct IMF WEO data. The IMF CLI (<code>scripts/imf-fetch.ts</code>) should have been invoked.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: Economic data assertions in executive-brief.md and stakeholder-perspectives.md strengthened with explicit vintage notation. Full IMF data call deferred due to session time pressure but piped Admiralty rating downgraded for unverified figures from [B2] to [C2].</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Next month-ahead run should call <code>npx tsx scripts/imf-fetch.ts weo --country SWE --indicator NGDP_RPCH --years 5 --persist</code> at the start of the data download phase, before legislative document analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap">Improvement 2 — SD Internal Deliberation Evidence Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap">Improvement 2 — SD Internal Deliberation Evidence Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: The H3 (SD Ultimatum) hypothesis in devils-advocate.md is structurally sound but lacks primary evidence (speech text, formal declaration, or interview). The Riksdag anföranden search (<code>search_anforanden</code>) for SD spokesperson statements was not executed.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: H3 was explicitly marked as unprovable and given 5/10 certainty score. The hypothesis is preserved as a RED TEAM contribution rather than a key finding.</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Run <code>search_anforanden({parti: "SD", rm: "2025/26", text: "drivmedel OR bränsleskatt"})</code> before concluding devils-advocate analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Media Framing Systematic Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Media Framing Systematic Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: media-framing-analysis.md relies on qualitative assessment. No systematic corpus of media headlines was gathered using the news archive tools or web fetch.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: All media claims in media-framing-analysis.md are hedged with "qualitative assessment only — no systematic media corpus" qualifier.</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Implement a 10-headline sample per major document using web_fetch from Riksdagen press page before writing media-framing section.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth">Improvement 4 — Family D Electoral Analysis Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth">Improvement 4 — Family D Electoral Analysis Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: Family D files (election-2026-analysis, coalition-mathematics, voter-segmentation) could not access current polling data. All seat projections are based on last known SCB/Sifo polling.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: All seat projections explicitly marked with "(2026-Q1 estimate; no new polling data in this run)".</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: SCB Statsborgen or direct fetch of Novus/Sifo tracking poll pages via web_fetch at start of each month-ahead run.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth">Improvement 5 — Tier-C Cross-Reference Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth">Improvement 5 — Tier-C Cross-Reference Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: cross-reference-map.md cites sibling monthly-review folder but does not perform deep content-level comparison. The two analyses were produced independently.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: Added explicit note in cross-reference-map.md that full synthesis required reading both analyses jointly.</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Month-ahead workflows should read the executive-brief.md from the same-day monthly-review folder before starting analysis, to identify and integrate overlapping assessment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-attested">SAT Techniques Attested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-attested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-techniques-attested">SAT Techniques Attested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-attested"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2875,8 +2875,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-attested">SAT Techniques Attested<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Technique</th><th>Applied In</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario Planning (4-scenario cone)</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Mapping</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td></tr><tr><td>Risk Register (L×I matrix)</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>Threat Analysis (STRIDE-style)</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>Significance Scoring (DIW ranking)</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td></tr><tr><td>Key Judgments with confidence labels</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative International Analysis</td><td>comparative-international.md</td></tr><tr><td>Red Team Analysis</td><td>devils-advocate.md (H3)</td></tr><tr><td>Historical Parallels</td><td>historical-parallels.md</td></tr><tr><td>Forward Indicators / Indicators Matrix</td><td>forward-indicators.md</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Total named SAT techniques: <strong>13</strong> (meets ≥10 requirement)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-month-ahead</li>
 <li><strong>Run ID</strong>: 24933129778</li>
@@ -2886,11 +2886,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</li>
 <li><strong>MCP Server</strong>: riksdag-regering (live, HTTP)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-health">MCP Health<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-health">MCP Health<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_sync_status</code> → <code>{"status":"live"}</code> on first attempt. No retries needed.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-downloaded">Documents Downloaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-downloaded"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-downloaded">Documents Downloaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-downloaded"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3086,21 +3086,56 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-downloaded">Documents Downloaded<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Organ</th><th>Date</th><th>Full-text</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>available</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget för 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>available</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget – Sänkt skatt drivmedel/el-gasprisstöd</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Kraftfullare åtgärder mot manipulation av färdskrivare</td><td>prop</td><td>Landsbygds/Infra</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Begränsning socialförsäkringsförmåner vid fängelse</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>EU:s bankpaket</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet datadelning offentlig förvaltning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Tydligt regelverk aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>prop</td><td>Landsbygds/Infra</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Sveriges anslutning till Ukraina-tribunalen</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sverige till Ukrainaskadeståndskommissionen</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>En betald polisutbildning</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03243</td><td>Förbättrade regler tonnagebeskattning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat/Näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03234</td><td>Ny lag kommunal hamnverksamhet</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Nya regler mot bedrägerier elektroniska kommunikationer</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat/Näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Nationell strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>skr</td><td>Arbetsmarknadsdep</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat/Näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>Utvärdering statens upplåning 2021-2025</td><td>skr</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>B2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Sibling Analysis Folders Read (Tier-C Cross-type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Sibling Analysis Folders Read (Tier-C Cross-type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/</code> — Today's monthly review (all 23 artifacts present)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-source-enrichment">Cross-Source Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-source-enrichment">Cross-Source Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Statskontoret</strong>: No specific agency-capacity source found for direct May 2026 implementation issues. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) will warrant Statskontoret follow-up once established.</li>
 <li><strong>SCB</strong>: Riksbank monetary policy evaluation data available from 2024 (KPIF 1.9% average 2024, GDP +1.0% 2024)</li>
 <li><strong>IMF</strong>: WEO Apr-2026 projections consulted for Swedish macroeconomic context</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Calendar API returned HTML (known API issue). Calendar data obtained through document analysis.</li>
 <li>Total documents: 20 propositions/skrivelser</li>
 <li>Full-text available but not fetched given time constraints; summary/snippet level sufficient</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03237-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3155,7 +3190,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T14:46:43.879Z">2026-04-25 14:46 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:34.697Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html b/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html
index 0752de473b..8327b6f871 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Month Ahead — May 2026: Sweden at the Pre-Election Inflection Point">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T14:46:44.382Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.862Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T14:46:44.382Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:34.862Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-25T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Month Ahead — May 2026: Sweden at the Pre-Election Inflection Point","description":"Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-election legislative package: the 2026 Spring Budget (HD03100) projecting continued but slow economic recovery, an emergency…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T14:46:44.382Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03237-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Month Ahead — May 2026: Sweden at the Pre-Election Inflection Point","description":"Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-election legislative package: the 2026 Spring Budget (HD03100) projecting continued but slow economic recovery, an emergency…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:34.862Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-month-ahead-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md","name":"documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03100-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03231-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03236-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03237-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03238-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03239-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03240-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD03246-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,16 +216,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm--bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--bluf"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">🎯 BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden enters May 2026 with the Tidö government deploying its largest pre-election legislative package: the 2026 Spring Budget (HD03100) projecting continued but slow economic recovery, an emergency fuel and energy cost relief (HD03236), and a 19-proposition legislative sprint across justice, energy, environment, and foreign policy. With elections exactly five months away (September 2026), the political risk is firmly centred on economic sentiment — whether household cost relief arrives in time to shift voter preferences — and on the government's credibility on rule-of-law reforms that have been central to the Tidö coalition's mandate since 2022.</p>
-<h2 id="rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm--3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">🧭 3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Economic risk assessment</strong>: Should stakeholders price in accelerated political instability risk before the September 2026 election given the extended recession and the emergency relief budget?</li>
 <li><strong>Legislative pipeline tracking</strong>: Which of the 19 current propositions carry the highest risk of opposition delay or committee blockage before the summer recess (June 2026)?</li>
 <li><strong>Coalition stability</strong>: Does the fuel-tax cut (HD03236) signal SD pressure on the government, and how does that shift coalition mathematics heading into election season?</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-intelligence-read">60-Second Intelligence Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-intelligence-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-intelligence-read">60-Second Intelligence Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-intelligence-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100)</strong> — Spring budget framework projects slow recovery; lågkonjunktur persists longer than earlier forecast. Government targets growth, welfare, security. FiU scrutiny June.</li>
 <li>🔴 <strong>Emergency fuel+energy relief (HD03236)</strong> — Sänkt skatt på drivmedel + el/gasprisstöd; election-cycle fiscal signal. Cost estimated at several billion SEK.</li>
@@ -234,11 +234,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-intelligence-read">60-Second Intelligence Read<a class="" a
 <li>🟢 <strong>Ukraine accountability</strong>: Sweden joins aggression tribunal (HD03231) and damages commission (HD03232) — foreign policy cohesion across parties.</li>
 <li>🔵 <strong>Forestry deregulation (HD03242)</strong> — contentious Alliansen/landsbygd vote; MP/S/V opposed.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may">Top Forward Trigger for May<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may">Top Forward Trigger for May<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger-for-may"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><strong>Trigger</strong>: Finance Committee (FiU) vote on Vårproposition 2026 (HD03100) and extra ändringsbudget (HD03236) — expected late May / early June. A negative committee opinion or SD abstention on the fiscal framework would be the single most significant political event before the summer recess.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>HIGH</strong> [B2] — Based on 20 verified government propositions and skrivelser from data.riksdagen.se, riksmöte 2025/26.</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d', 'background': '#0a0e27', 'nodeBorder': '#00d9ff', 'clusterBkg': '#1a1e3d', 'titleColor': '#e0e0e0'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
@@ -257,12 +257,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-assessment">Confidence Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="
     style G fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style I fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Tier</strong>: Tier-C Month-Ahead</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-intelligence-picture">Lead Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-intelligence-picture">Lead Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p>May 2026 represents Sweden's most consequential legislative month of the election cycle. The Tidö government (M, SD, KD, L with MP support on energy) is racing to deliver tangible voter benefits before the September 2026 election. The concurrent filing of Vårpropositionen 2026 (HD03100), an emergency relief budget (HD03236), and 17 additional propositions in a single April wave signals a politically motivated legislative sprint.</p>
 <p><strong>Central intelligence assessment</strong>: The government is executing a pre-election delivery strategy targeting three voter segments — cost-pressured households (fuel/energy relief), law-and-order prioritisers (justice package), and rural/landsbygd voters (forestry, wind revenue, harbour law). The strategy is coherent but vulnerable: if economic data for Q1 2026 show continued contraction when released in May, the government's narrative of "recovery under way" collapses.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-document-ranking">DIW-Weighted Document Ranking<a class=
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>DIW Weight</th><th>Intelligence Tier</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>9.8</td><td>L3 Intelligence-grade</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra budget — fuel/energy relief</td><td>9.2</td><td>L3 Intelligence-grade</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget 2026</td><td>8.5</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>8.0</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>7.8</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>HD03237</td><td>Betald polisutbildning</td><td>7.5</td><td>L2+ Priority</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>7.2</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>7.0</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD03231</td><td>Ukraine aggression tribunal</td><td>6.8</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03232</td><td>Ukraine damages commission</td><td>6.8</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>HD03242</td><td>Aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>6.5</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>HD03245</td><td>Strategi mot mäns våld</td><td>6.2</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>HD03253</td><td>EU bankpaket</td><td>6.0</td><td>L2 Strategic</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet datadelning</td><td>5.5</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Socialförsäkring vid fängelse</td><td>5.5</td><td>L1 Surface</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Economic security vector (CRITICAL)</strong>: The spring budget and emergency relief reflect a government reading household cost pain as the primary electoral vulnerability. The fuel tax cut combined with electricity/gas price support sends a direct signal to households that costs are being addressed. This is responsive governance or election-cycle pandering depending on the observer's frame — the fiscal cost is real (est. SEK 4–8 bn for the combined package based on proportional estimates from HD03236 scope).</p>
 <p><strong>Rule-of-law vector (HIGH)</strong>: The justice package — paid police education, tougher juvenile rules, prisoner benefit restriction — is direct Tidö mandate delivery. M/KD designed these; SD supports; L has reservations on youth justice. S/V/MP oppose on rights grounds. Passage is secured (M+SD+KD majority ≈ 175 seats), but committee debates will be televised and will shape media framing.</p>
 <p><strong>Energy transition vector (HIGH)</strong>: New electricity system laws (HD03240) and wind power municipality revenue sharing (HD03239) represent the government's energy security strategy. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) is a major institutional change reducing Länsstyrelse/Mark- och miljödomstol processing times for critical infrastructure. Opposition from MP is expected on process grounds.</p>
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated Intelligence Picture<a cl
     "Forestry HD03242": [0.75, 0.65]
     "Police Education HD03237": [0.30, 0.75]
     "Wind Revenue HD03239": [0.50, 0.70]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle">PIR Handoff (Priority Intelligence Requirements for Next Cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle">PIR Handoff (Priority Intelligence Requirements for Next Cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP data release (Statistics Sweden, likely May 2026) — will it confirm or contradict the government's "recovery under way" narrative?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: FiU committee position on HD03100/HD03236 — first opposition position statements expected May 2026.</li>
@@ -412,27 +412,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-handoff-priority-intelligence-requirements-for-next-cycle">PIR Ha
 <li><strong>PIR-4</strong>: Environmental review authority (HD03238) — Länsstyrelse and NGO responses to institutional restructuring.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence">Key Judgment 1 — Economic Recovery Remains Fragile [MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence">Key Judgment 1 — Economic Recovery Remains Fragile [MEDIUM confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-1--economic-recovery-remains-fragile-medium-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidö government's Spring Budget 2026 (HD03100 [riksdagen.se]) projects recovery, but the explicit acknowledgement in HC01FiU20 [riksdagen.se] that lågkonjunktur is "more prolonged than expected" indicates the government is managing downside scenarios rather than celebrating growth. <strong>We assess with MEDIUM confidence that Q1 2026 GDP data will show growth between 0% and 0.5% — insufficient to validate the government's recovery narrative but not catastrophic.</strong> The risk of negative Q1 GDP is estimated at 15–20% given external trade headwinds.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>MEDIUM</strong>
 PIR: PIR-1 (Q1 GDP data release date, expected May 2026)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 — Tidö Coalition Will Remain Intact Through September Election [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence">Key Judgment 2 — Tidö Coalition Will Remain Intact Through September Election [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-2--tidö-coalition-will-remain-intact-through-september-election-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Despite fiscal pressure and opposition attacks, <strong>we assess with HIGH confidence that the Tidö coalition (M+SD+KD+L) will not fracture before the September 2026 election.</strong> SD has a strong electoral incentive to remain associated with the government's law-and-order delivery (HD03237, HD03246 [riksdagen.se]). M/KD/L have no viable alternative coalition partner. The emergency relief budget (HD03236) is a concession designed precisely to manage SD demands. The marginal risk is SD abstention on specific votes, not a confidence crisis.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>HIGH</strong>
 PIR: PIR-3 (SD official position on Vårpropositionen framework)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence">Key Judgment 3 — Energy Legislative Package Will Pass With Minor Amendments [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence">Key Judgment 3 — Energy Legislative Package Will Pass With Minor Amendments [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-3--energy-legislative-package-will-pass-with-minor-amendments-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The electricity system law (HD03240 [riksdagen.se]) and wind power municipality revenue law (HD03239 [riksdagen.se]) reflect a rare area of broad cross-party support (M, SD, C, L, and conditionally MP). <strong>We assess with HIGH confidence that both will pass the Riksdag before the summer recess</strong>, with possible amendments requiring higher transparency on revenue distribution mechanisms. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) is more contentious and may face one-year implementation delay.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>HIGH</strong>
 PIR: PIR-4 (Environmental review authority legal challenges, Länsstyrelse response)</p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence">Key Judgment 4 — Ukraine International Legal Instruments Will Achieve Near-Unanimous Ratification [VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence">Key Judgment 4 — Ukraine International Legal Instruments Will Achieve Near-Unanimous Ratification [VERY HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-4--ukraine-international-legal-instruments-will-achieve-near-unanimous-ratification-very-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden's accession to the special tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine (HD03231 [riksdagen.se]) and the international compensation commission (HD03232 [riksdagen.se]) enjoy support across all eight Riksdag parties. <strong>We assess with VERY HIGH confidence that both propositions will be ratified in May 2026</strong> with near-unanimous votes (expected &#x3C;5 Nej votes from isolated exceptions).</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>VERY HIGH</strong></p>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence">Key Judgment 5 — Government's Election Messaging Will Emphasise Security and Rule of Law [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence">Key Judgment 5 — Government's Election Messaging Will Emphasise Security and Rule of Law [HIGH confidence]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-5--governments-election-messaging-will-emphasise-security-and-rule-of-law-high-confidence"></a></h4>
 <p>The concentration of justice reform propositions (HD03237, HD03246, HD03252 [riksdagen.se]) in the final pre-election legislative sprint confirms that M/KD leads are prioritising their mandate-delivery narrative on safety and rule of law. <strong>We assess with HIGH confidence that the government's formal election campaign will lead with the crime/justice agenda, with the economic recovery as a secondary but essential supporting theme.</strong> This reflects internal polling awareness that the government's weakest ground is the economy.</p>
 <p>Confidence label: <strong>HIGH</strong></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-assumptions-check"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-assumptions-check">Key Assumptions Check<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Assumption</th><th>Basis</th><th>Sensitivity</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SD remains in coalition</td><td>Electoral incentive; no viable alternative</td><td>HIGH sensitivity — assumption could fail if GDP data catastrophic</td></tr><tr><td>Q1 2026 GDP ≥ 0%</td><td>Riksbank rate cuts taking effect; base case</td><td>MEDIUM sensitivity — key risk assumption</td></tr><tr><td>FiU committee approves HD03100</td><td>M+SD+KD majority ≥ 175 seats</td><td>LOW sensitivity — structural majority</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine treaties: cross-party consensus</td><td>Unanimous foreign policy position since 2022</td><td>VERY LOW sensitivity</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements">PIR Handoff — Priority Intelligence Requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements">PIR Handoff — Priority Intelligence Requirements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP release (SCB, ~May 2026) — key for Scenario A/B/C determination</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: FiU committee first reading on HD03100/HD03236 — expected second week of May</li>
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-pir-handoff--priority-intelligence-requirements">PIR Handoff — Prio
 <li><strong>PIR-6</strong>: First polls post-Vårpropositionen publication — electoral impact measurement</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-7</strong>: EU Commission response to HD03242 (forestry) — formal notification risk</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward">Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward">Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Carried forward from monthly-review (analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/)</strong>: The monthly review's PIR on coalition cohesion (post-SD budget demands) remains open; this assessment provides updated HIGH confidence on coalition stability.</li>
 <li><strong>Open PIR on Riksbank rate path</strong> from prior cycles: now partially resolved — KPIF stabilised at 1.9% (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]).</li>
@@ -492,16 +492,16 @@ <h2 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs-carried-forward">Prior-Cycle PIRs (Carried Forward)<
     style KJ4 fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style KJ5 fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-methodology">Scoring Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-methodology"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>D</strong> (Domestic Impact): 1–10, parliamentary/electoral/societal significance</li>
 <li><strong>I</strong> (International Resonance): 1–10, EU/NATO/Nordic/global implications</li>
 <li><strong>W</strong> (Welfare Effect): 1–10, direct citizen welfare impact</li>
 <li><strong>DIW Total</strong>: weighted average (D×0.5 + I×0.2 + W×0.3)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tier-rankings">Priority Tier Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-rankings"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance">Tier P0 — Critical National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tier-rankings">Priority Tier Rankings<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tier-rankings"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance">Tier P0 — Critical National Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03100 — 2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</strong> [riksdagen.se]</p>
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-p0--critical-national-significance">Tier P0 — Critical Nationa
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p1--high-significance">Tier P1 — High Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-significance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p1--high-significance">Tier P1 — High Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p1--high-significance"></a></h4>
 <ol start="3">
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03240 — Nya lagar om elsystemet</strong> [riksdagen.se]</p>
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-p1--high-significance">Tier P1 — High Significance<a class=""
 </ul>
 </li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-tier-p2--significant">Tier P2 — Significant<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--significant"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-tier-p2--significant">Tier P2 — Significant<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tier-p2--significant"></a></h4>
 <ol start="8">
 <li>
 <p><strong>HD03231 — Ukraine aggression tribunal</strong> [riksdagen.se]</p>
@@ -603,61 +603,61 @@ <h3 id="rm-tier-p2--significant">Tier P2 — Significant<a class="" aria-hidden=
     y-axis "DIW Score" 0 --> 10
     bar [9.2, 8.9, 8.1, 7.5, 7.5, 7.2, 7.1, 6.8, 6.5]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Note</strong>: Qualitative assessment only — no systematic media corpus gathered in this run.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing">Government/Coalition Party Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-moderaterna-m">Moderaterna (M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-moderaterna-m"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing">Government/Coalition Party Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-governmentcoalition-party-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-moderaterna-m">Moderaterna (M)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-moderaterna-m"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Ansvar och reform — leverans på löften" (Responsibility and reform — delivery on promises)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Will present HD03100 as proof of economic management competence</li>
 <li>Energy package (HD03240, HD03239) framed as "green competitiveness" not just "green transition"</li>
 <li>Crime laws (HD03237, HD03246) framed as "trygghet" — safety and security delivery</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd">Sverigedemokraterna (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd">Sverigedemokraterna (SD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sverigedemokraterna-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Sverige först — kostnader ned, brott upp, vi levererar" (Sweden first — costs down, crime up, we deliver)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03236 (fuel tax cut) will be the primary SD-branded win</li>
 <li>Juvenile justice (HD03246) presented as SD's distinctive policy victory</li>
 <li>Will avoid taking credit for energy transition aspects (ideological tension)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-kristdemokraterna-kd">Kristdemokraterna (KD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kristdemokraterna-kd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-kristdemokraterna-kd">Kristdemokraterna (KD)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-kristdemokraterna-kd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Familjer och trygghet" (Families and safety)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>KD will focus on HD03246 (juvenile justice) — crime/family values intersection</li>
 <li>Will present HD03237 (police education) as long-term investment in community safety</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-liberalerna-l">Liberalerna (L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-liberalerna-l"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-liberalerna-l">Liberalerna (L)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-liberalerna-l"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Reformer för frihet och integration" (Reforms for freedom and integration)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Most likely to frame energy transition as EU alignment</li>
 <li>Weakest position in the sprint — will struggle to differentiate from M</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s">Socialdemokraterna (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-opposition-framing">Opposition Framing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opposition-framing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-socialdemokraterna-s">Socialdemokraterna (S)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-socialdemokraterna-s"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "För lite, för sent, för dyrt" (Too little, too late, too expensive)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Will attack HD03236 as inadequate compared to household cost pressures</li>
 <li>Will present HD03100 (spring budget) as a "budget för valvinst, inte för Sverige" (budget for electoral victory, not for Sweden)</li>
 <li>Will attack HD03238 (env authority) as weakening environmental protection</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-vänsterpartiet-v">Vänsterpartiet (V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vänsterpartiet-v"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-vänsterpartiet-v">Vänsterpartiet (V)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-vänsterpartiet-v"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Skattelättnad för bil, ingenting för boende" (Tax cuts for cars, nothing for housing)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sharpest critique will focus on housing absence from legislative sprint</li>
 <li>Will use HD03236 to frame Tidö as "the car lobby's government"</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-miljöpartiet-mp">Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-miljöpartiet-mp">Miljöpartiet (MP)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-miljöpartiet-mp"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: "Klimatbrott mot framtida generationer" (Climate crime against future generations)</p>
 <ul>
 <li>Sharpest opposition to HD03242 (forestry) and potential HD03238 weakening</li>
 <li>Will use any implementation delays in env authority as confirmation of green regression</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-centerpartiet-c">Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-centerpartiet-c">Centerpartiet (C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-centerpartiet-c"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Predicted framing</strong>: Mixed — will support energy reforms (HD03239/HD03240) while attacking fiscal framework</p>
 <ul>
 <li>C is internally divided on supporting Tidö energy policies; rural wing supports HD03239</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation">Press Coverage Predicted Polarisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation">Press Coverage Predicted Polarisation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     SvD["Svenska Dagbladet\n(pro-reform)"] --> Gov
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-press-coverage-predicted-polarisation">Press Coverage Predicted Polar
     style Gov fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style Opp fill:#ff006e,color:#fff
     style Mixed fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking">Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking">Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -703,9 +703,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-longitudinal-entry-for-tracking">Longitudinal Entry (for tracking)<a
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Expected framing shift</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>May 2026 week 1</td><td>FiU first reading HD03100</td><td>Economic competence debate begins</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026 week 2</td><td>Q1 GDP release</td><td>Frame shifts dramatically based on result</td></tr><tr><td>May 2026 week 3</td><td>BRÅ crime statistics</td><td>Crime narrative frame intensifies</td></tr><tr><td>June 2026</td><td>Riksdag summer recess</td><td>Campaign mode begins formally</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Lens</strong>: 6-Dimension Stakeholder Matrix</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-influence-network">Stakeholder Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-influence-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-influence-network">Stakeholder Influence Network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-influence-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart LR
     A["Government\n(Kristersson/Svantesson)"] --> B["FiU Committee\n(M/SD/KD majority)"]
@@ -721,8 +721,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-influence-network">Stakeholder Influence Network<a class=
     style D fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style E fill:#ff006e,color:#fff
     style K fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition">Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix">6-Lens Stakeholder Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-6-lens-stakeholder-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition">Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalition)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: PM Ulf Kristersson (M), Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M), Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M), Energy/Climate: Lotta Edholm/Johan Britz (KD/M)</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Deliver visible reforms before September election; maintain coalition coherence; manage economic narrative</li>
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-1-government-tidö-coalition">Lens 1: Government (Tidö Coalitio
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: HIGH (government controls legislative agenda via Riksdag majority)</li>
 <li><strong>Source</strong>: HD03100, HD03237, HD03246 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c">Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c">Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: S party leader (parliamentary opposition), V (Nooshi Dadgostar), MP leadership, C (Muharrem Demirok)</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Maximise opposition visibility; frame government as incompetent economic manager</li>
@@ -738,28 +738,28 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-2-opposition-s-v-mp-c">Lens 2: Opposition (S, V, MP, C)<a class=
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM (132 seats; cannot block with votes but strong media/committee presence)</li>
 <li><strong>Source</strong>: HC01FiU20 opposition positions [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-3-businessindustry">Lens 3: Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-businessindustry"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-3-businessindustry">Lens 3: Business/Industry<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-3-businessindustry"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: Svenskt Näringsliv, Energiföretagen Sverige, Skogsindustrierna, banking sector (EU bankpaket HD03253)</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Predictable regulatory environment; energy cost competitiveness; fast permitting (HD03238)</li>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Broadly supportive of deregulation package; concerns about new environmental authority's operational readiness</li>
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (economic feedback loops; employer associations inform FiU)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society">Lens 4: Labour/Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society">Lens 4: Labour/Civil Society<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-4-labourcivil-society"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: LO (blue-collar), TCO (white-collar), SACO (academic), BRIS, Civil Rights Defenders, Naturskyddsföreningen</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: LO — real wage recovery; BRIS — juvenile justice rights; Naturskyddsföreningen — HD03238/HD03242 opposition</li>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: LO cautious on spring budget adequacy; BRIS opposes HD03246; Naturskyddsföreningen ready to challenge HD03238</li>
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM (civil society litigation capacity; LO's voter bloc signal to S)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-5-internationaleu">Lens 5: International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-internationaleu"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-5-internationaleu">Lens 5: International/EU<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-5-internationaleu"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: European Commission (EU Banking Package HD03253, EIA Directive HD03238), CoE (ECHR HD03246), ICC/UN (Ukraine tribunals HD03231/232), NATO allies</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: Swedish compliance with EU directives; rule-of-law standards; Ukraine accountability participation</li>
 <li><strong>Position</strong>: Supportive on Ukraine; monitoring HD03238 for EIA compliance; neutral on domestic fiscal measures</li>
 <li><strong>Influence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH on regulatory compliance; LOW on domestic politics</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy">Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy">Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Key actors</strong>: Governor (vacant replacement post-Thedéen term?), executive board</li>
 <li><strong>Primary interest</strong>: KPIF stability at 2% target; ECB coordination; exchange rate stability</li>
@@ -768,8 +768,8 @@ <h3 id="rm-lens-6-riksbank-monetary-policy">Lens 6: Riksbank (Monetary Policy)<a
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HC01FiU24 FiU evaluation of Riksbankens penningpolitik 2024 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-72-hour-horizon-by-2026-04-28">72-Hour Horizon (by 2026-04-28)<a clas
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Riksdag scheduling of HD03100 first reading</td><td>riksdagen.se/kalender</td><td>HIGH</td><td>FiU committee vote timing confirmed</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>SD leadership public comment on Vårpropositionen</td><td>SD press office</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Confirms PIR-3 (coalition signal)</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>M party spokesperson statement on economic narrative</td><td>M press office</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Sets framing for media cycle</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Environmental NGO (Naturskyddsföreningen) response to HD03238</td><td>NGO press release</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Early legal challenge signal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02">One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02">One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-week-horizon-by-2026-05-02">One-Week Horizon (by 2026-05-02)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>5</td><td>FiU committee scheduling HD03100 (Vårpropositionen)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition management signal</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Opposition (S) press conference on spring budget</td><td>S press office</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Attack line formation</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Sifo/Novus tracking poll release</td><td>Sifo/Novus</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Electoral impact of legislative sprint</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Riksbank advance communication pre-May meeting</td><td>riksbank.se</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Interest rate trajectory</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>SiS (Statens institutionsstyrelse) response to HD03246</td><td>SiS press office</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Juvenile justice implementation signal</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03231/232 committee scheduling (UtU)</td><td>riksdagen.se/utskott</td><td>LOW</td><td>Ukraine ratification timeline confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25">One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25">One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-one-month-horizon-by-2026-05-25">One-Month Horizon (by 2026-05-25)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>11</td><td>Q1 2026 GDP release (SCB)</td><td>SCB.se</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Scenario A/B/C determination (PIR-1)</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Riksbank May monetary policy meeting decision</td><td>riksbank.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Rate cut or hold signals fiscal space</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>BRÅ crime statistics release (if scheduled May)</td><td>bra.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Crime narrative validation</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>KD/L party congress statements</td><td>Party websites</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Threshold-party survival signals</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>Environmental review authority NGO court filing</td><td>Administrative court</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>PIR-4 confirmation</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>Riksdag final vote HD03100 (Vårpropositionen)</td><td>riksdagen.se</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Coalition majority confirmed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-election-horizon-september-2026">Election Horizon (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-september-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-election-horizon-september-2026">Election Horizon (September 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-horizon-september-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-election-horizon-september-2026">Election Horizon (September 2026)<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>#</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Source</th><th>Significance</th><th>Trigger</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>17</td><td>Q2 2026 GDP growth rate</td><td>SCB.se</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Recovery narrative validation</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>Unemployment rate trajectory (Aug 2026)</td><td>SCB.se/Arbetsförmedlingen</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Economic anxiety level</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>Final Sifo pre-election poll</td><td>Sifo</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>Seat projection update</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>KD and L final poll numbers vs 4% threshold</td><td>Multiple pollsters</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Tidö continuation feasibility</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicators-summary-chart">Indicators Summary Chart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary-chart"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicators-summary-chart">Indicators Summary Chart<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicators-summary-chart"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 timeline
     title Forward Indicators Timeline
@@ -982,11 +982,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicators-summary-chart">Indicators Summary Chart<a class="" aria-hi
         Q2 GDP : Final polls
         Unemployment : KD/L threshold</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-framework">Scenario Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Three scenarios are constructed for the May–June 2026 window (before summer Riksdag recess).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30">Scenario A: Economic Recovery Signal — "Soft Landing" (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30">Scenario A: Economic Recovery Signal — "Soft Landing" (Probability: 30%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP data released in May shows modest positive growth (0.5–1.5%). Riksbanken signals a possible additional rate cut. The fuel and energy relief package (HD03236) is welcomed by households. The legislative sprint completes on schedule. The government enters summer recess with an economic credibility boost.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-a-economic-recovery-signal--soft-landing-probability-30">Sce
 </ul>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Unlikely</em> (20–37% probability range — Kent Scale) given accumulated recession depth</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55">Scenario B: Prolonged Stagnation — "More of the Same" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55">Scenario B: Prolonged Stagnation — "More of the Same" (Probability: 55%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP is flat (0–0.5%) or marginally positive. Recession continues but doesn't deepen significantly. The spring budget and emergency relief pass but are deemed insufficient by opposition. Legislative sprint completes for all non-contested items; forestry (HD03242) and youth justice (HD03246) face prolonged committee scrutiny. The government governs competently but without a transformative narrative.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-b-prolonged-stagnation--more-of-the-same-probability-55">Sce
 </ul>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Roughly even</em> (45–55% probability) — most consistent with current trajectory</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15">Scenario C: Economic Deterioration — "Crisis Narrative" (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15">Scenario C: Economic Deterioration — "Crisis Narrative" (Probability: 15%)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Q1 2026 GDP is negative (below -0.5%). US tariff escalation hits Swedish industrial exports in May. Riksbanken signals emergency rate cuts. The emergency relief package is judged too small by public opinion. SD makes public demands for a larger relief budget or threatens abstentions. The "crisis government" narrative takes hold.</p>
 <p><strong>Leading indicators</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -1035,12 +1035,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-c-economic-deterioration--crisis-narrative-probability-15">S
 </ul>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Unlikely</em> (20–37%) but with higher-than-normal tail risk given the external trade environment</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored">Scenario D: Foreign Policy Escalation — "Ukraine Emergency" (Probability: &#x3C;5%, monitored)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored">Scenario D: Foreign Policy Escalation — "Ukraine Emergency" (Probability: &#x3C;5%, monitored)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d-foreign-policy-escalation--ukraine-emergency-probability-5-monitored"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Description</strong>: Russia escalates hybrid warfare against Sweden following ratification of Ukraine aggression tribunal accession (HD03231). Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure; disinformation campaign; energy supply disruption. Riksdag enters emergency session.</p>
 <p><strong>This scenario is a monitored low-probability/high-impact outlier.</strong></p>
 <p><strong>WEP assessment</strong>: <em>Remote</em> (&#x3C;7%) — but would dominate all other political dynamics</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-probability-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1084,8 +1084,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-probability-summary">Scenario Probability Summary<a class=""
     "A: Soft Landing (30%)" : 30
     "C: Crisis Narrative (15%)" : 15</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1202,17 +1202,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-register">Risk Register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk ID</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood (1-5)</th><th>Impact (1-5)</th><th>L×I</th><th>Category</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01</td><td>Q1 2026 GDP contraction confirmed — undermines government recovery narrative</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>20</td><td>Economic</td><td>Pre-emptive communication; additional relief measures</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-02</td><td>SD coalition defection on fiscal framework</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>Political</td><td>Concessions on fuel relief scope; SD consultation</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-03</td><td>Environmental review authority (HD03238) faces legal challenge, delays</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Regulatory</td><td>Transitional provisions; robust legal drafting</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-04</td><td>Opposition unified campaign: "crisis government" narrative</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>Electoral</td><td>Deliver visible reform wins before July recess</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-05</td><td>International trade shock (US tariffs on Swedish exports)</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>External</td><td>WTO engagement; EU trade policy coordination</td><td>[C2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-06</td><td>Youth justice reform (HD03246) ECHR challenge succeeds</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Legal</td><td>Council of Europe consultation; proportionality review</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-07</td><td>Police education reform (HD03237) implementation delay</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>Operational</td><td>Phased rollout; existing recruitment measures maintained</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-08</td><td>Forestry deregulation (HD03242) triggers EU Green Deal conflict</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>EU/Legal</td><td>Legal opinion on Natura 2000 compatibility</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>R-09</td><td>Energy system law (HD03240) creates market uncertainty</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>Economic</td><td>Clarity in transitional rules; stakeholder consultation</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>R-10</td><td>Ukraine tribunal (HD03231) faces non-ratification delay</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>Foreign</td><td>Cross-party whip management</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-risks-li--12">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--12"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical">R-01: Economic Narrative Collapse (L×I = 20) — CRITICAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-risks-li--12">Priority Risks (L×I ≥ 12)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-risks-li--12"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical">R-01: Economic Narrative Collapse (L×I = 20) — CRITICAL<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-01-economic-narrative-collapse-li--20--critical"></a></h4>
 <p>Sweden has been in lågkonjunktur since 2023. The Riksbank cut rates in 2024, and KPIF stabilised at ~1.9% (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]). However, HD03100 [riksdagen.se] explicitly acknowledges the recession is "more prolonged than expected." If Statistics Sweden (SCB) releases Q1 2026 GDP showing negative or flat growth in May, the government's narrative of "recovery under way" — the central premise of the Spring Budget — is contradicted by data.</p>
 <p><strong>Posterior probability</strong>: ~40% that Q1 2026 GDP growth will be negative or below 0.5% [C2]</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16">R-03: Environmental Review Authority Legal Challenges (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16">R-03: Environmental Review Authority Legal Challenges (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-03-environmental-review-authority-legal-challenges-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p>The new authority (HD03238 [riksdagen.se]) is designed to replace multiple Länsstyrelse functions and streamline permit processing. NGOs (Naturskyddsföreningen, WWF) are likely to challenge the constitutional basis of removing environmental checks from regional authorities. Administrative courts could issue injunctions.</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading chain</strong>: HD03238 delay → renewable energy project delays → energy system law (HD03240) implementation gaps → Sweden's climate targets slip</p>
-<h3 id="rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16">R-04: "Crisis Government" Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16">R-04: "Crisis Government" Opposition Narrative (L×I = 16)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-r-04-crisis-government-opposition-narrative-li--16"></a></h4>
 <p>S, V, MP collectively hold 132 seats. With the spring budget providing cover for unified messaging, S's economic policy team (under assumed leadership) will frame every relief measure as "inadequate" and every reform as "hurried and legally fragile before the election."</p>
 <p><strong>Cascading chain</strong>: Negative economic data → opposition credibility gain → voter intention shift → SD reassessment of coalition value</p>
-<h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-heat-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Risk Matrix: Likelihood vs Impact"
@@ -1303,9 +1303,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-risk-heat-map">Risk Heat Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Risk</th><th>L</th><th>I</th><th>Score</th><th>Status</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-01 Economic narrative</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>20</td><td>🔴 CRITICAL</td></tr><tr><td>R-03 Env authority delay</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R-04 Opposition narrative</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>16</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R-05 Trade shock</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>15</td><td>🔴 HIGH</td></tr><tr><td>R-08 EU forestry conflict</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-02 SD defection</td><td>2</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-06 ECHR challenge</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-09 Energy uncertainty</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>8</td><td>🟡 MEDIUM</td></tr><tr><td>R-07 Police delay</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr><tr><td>R-10 Ukraine non-ratification</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>🟢 LOW</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-swot-matrix">SWOT Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-matrix"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Strength</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Strong legislative mandate delivery</td><td>19+ propositions in April sprint; HD03100 [riksdagen.se], HD03237 [riksdagen.se], HD03246 [riksdagen.se] demonstrate breadth</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Coalition stability maintained</td><td>SD, M, KD, L aligned on justice and fiscal package despite pre-election pressures</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy policy coherence</td><td>Simultaneous HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239 package shows integrated energy strategy [riksdagen.se]</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine solidarity (cross-party)</td><td>HD03231 + HD03232 [riksdagen.se] enjoy near-universal Riksdag support; Sweden's NATO/rule-of-law standing reinforced</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Police reform credibility</td><td>HD03237 [riksdagen.se] — paid police education addresses the force's staffing crisis directly</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A1]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Weakness</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Recession extends longer than projected</td><td>FiU betänkande HC01FiU20 [riksdagen.se]: lågkonjunktur "mer utdragen" than in Vårpropositionen</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Fiscal credibility under pressure</td><td>Emergency relief budget (HD03236) signals ad hoc reactive policy rather than structural reform</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental review reform (HD03238) risks speed-quality trade-off</td><td>New authority lacks track record; Länsstyrelse competence transfer uncertain</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>Juvenile justice reform (HD03246) ECHR vulnerability</td><td>Tougher rules for under-18s may face Council of Europe scrutiny</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Forestry deregulation (HD03242) divides Sweden's international image</td><td>Green credentials questioned by NGOs citing Natura 2000 [riksdagen.se context]</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Opportunity</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Economic recovery narrative if Q1 GDP positive</td><td>Riksbank monetary policy evaluation (HC01FiU24 [riksdagen.se]) suggests KPIF stabilised at ~2%; rate cuts possible</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind power income gives municipalities electoral incentive</td><td>HD03239 [riksdagen.se] — local government gain from offshore/onshore wind revenue creates new rural coalition partners</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine leadership position builds NATO credibility</td><td>HD03231/HD03232 [riksdagen.se] — Sweden as early mover on accountability mechanisms</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>Police reform delivers visible quick wins</td><td>HD03237 [riksdagen.se] — increased police presence measurable before September election</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>[A2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Evidence</th><th>Impact</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q1 2026 GDP contraction data (if negative)</td><td>Extended recession forecast; FiU notes revised downward prognosis in HC01FiU20 [riksdagen.se]</td><td>CRITICAL</td><td>[A1]</td></tr><tr><td>SD ultimatum risk on fuel relief scope</td><td>HD03236 [riksdagen.se] may be insufficient for SD's voter base; risk of SD demanding more</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Opposition unified economic attack</td><td>S/V/MP could frame spring package as "too little, too late" given recession depth</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[B2]</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental review authority implementation failure</td><td>HD03238 [riksdagen.se] — tight timeline to establish new authority by 2027; legal challenges from NGOs likely</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>[B3]</td></tr><tr><td>International trade risk (US tariffs)</td><td>Global trade uncertainty (WEO Apr-2026 context) affects Swedish export-dependent industries</td><td>HIGH</td><td>[C2]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-strategic-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-strategic-matrix">TOWS Strategic Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th><strong>Strengths</strong></th><th><strong>Weaknesses</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Opportunities</strong></td><td><strong>SO</strong>: Deploy Ukraine leadership to reinforce security credibility before election; use police reform delivery as election-season visible win</td><td><strong>WO</strong>: Use energy package (HD03240/239) to counter recession weakness; frame environmental reform as pro-growth</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Threats</strong></td><td><strong>ST</strong>: Strong legislative sprint insulates against single-issue opposition attacks; coalition breadth provides buffer against SD ultimatums</td><td><strong>WT</strong>: Economic weakness + fiscal ad-hoc measures + extended recession = narrative crisis if Q1 GDP is negative</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression">Cross-SWOT Theme: Election Countdown Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression">Cross-SWOT Theme: Election Countdown Compression<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression"></a></h3>
 <p>All SWOT elements are compressed by the 5-month election countdown. Strengths must translate to voter perception before September 2026. Weaknesses — especially the economic data — are existential if Q1 2026 shows no recovery. The window for corrective action closes in July (Riksdag summer recess).</p>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 quadrantChart
@@ -1514,9 +1514,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-swot-theme-election-countdown-compression">Cross-SWOT Theme: El
     "Fiscal Credibility": [0.20, 0.25]
     "SD Ultimatum Risk": [0.68, 0.20]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-category-1-electoral-threats">Category 1: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-electoral-threats"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-political-threat-taxonomy">Political Threat Taxonomy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-threat-taxonomy"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-1-electoral-threats">Category 1: Electoral Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-1-electoral-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-E01</strong>: Opposition "crisis economy" attack campaign</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: Unified S/V/MP messaging on economic failure</li>
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-1-electoral-threats">Category 1: Electoral Threats<a class="
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH</li>
 <li>Source: HD03236 scope (fuel tax cut — magnitude unknown without full text) [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats">Category 2: Institutional/Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats">Category 2: Institutional/Legal Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-L01</strong>: Constitutional Court/Administrative Court challenge to HD03238 (Environmental Review Authority)</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: NGO coalition (Naturskyddsföreningen, ClientEarth, WWF Sweden) seeking injunction</li>
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-2-institutionallegal-threats">Category 2: Institutional/Lega
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: MEDIUM (long-term)</li>
 <li>Source: HD03246 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats">Category 3: Economic/External Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats">Category 3: Economic/External Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-X01</strong>: US tariff escalation on Swedish manufactured goods</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: WTO-incompatible tariffs on Swedish automotive, steel, pharmaceutical exports</li>
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-3-economicexternal-threats">Category 3: Economic/External Th
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH</li>
 <li>Source: HD03231 [riksdagen.se]; Sweden's NATO status (2024)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-category-4-coalition-threats">Category 4: Coalition Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-coalition-threats"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-category-4-coalition-threats">Category 4: Coalition Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-category-4-coalition-threats"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>T-C01</strong>: SD threatens to vote against Vårproposition if fuel relief insufficient</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: SD leadership signals insufficient cost-of-living support; demands more</li>
@@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-category-4-coalition-threats">Category 4: Coalition Threats<a class="
 <li><strong>Severity</strong>: HIGH (but low probability given election proximity — SD also benefits from Tidö success)</li>
 <li>Source: Tidö coalition structure; HD03236 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario">Attack Tree: Coalition Collapse Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario">Attack Tree: Coalition Collapse Scenario<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     ROOT["🔴 Government Crisis\n(5+ months pre-election)"]
@@ -1596,23 +1596,23 @@ <h2 id="rm-attack-tree-coalition-collapse-scenario">Attack Tree: Coalition Colla
     style B fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style C fill:#ff006e,color:#fff
     style F fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-summary">Intelligence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-summary">Intelligence Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The most credible threat combination is: <strong>economic data shock (T-X01/T-E01) + opposition narrative exploitation (T-E01)</strong> creating a "lame duck" perception of the government in its final legislative months. This is not likely to trigger coalition collapse (SD has no electoral incentive to destabilise before September), but it could significantly damage the government's vote share and undermine mandate-continuity arguments.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03100">HD03100<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03100"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03100 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L3 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>The 2026 Spring Budget (Ekonomisk vårproposition) is the government's primary macroeconomic policy statement before the September 2026 election. It establishes the fiscal framework, growth projections, and spending priorities for 2026–2030.</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03100/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03100/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 10/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 10/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-1010--admiralty-b1"></a></h3>
 <p>This is the highest-significance document of the legislative sprint. It defines the government's economic record and campaign narrative. The Vårpropositionen is:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>The primary tool for framing "economic recovery" as a government achievement</li>
 <li>The fiscal foundation upon which HD03236 (emergency relief) and HD0399 (spring amendment) layer</li>
 <li>The document that opposition parties (S) will attack most vigorously</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>GDP growth forecast 2026: ~1.5% (recovering from lågkonjunktur)</li>
 <li>Inflation projection: ~2.0% (aligned with Riksbank target)</li>
@@ -1620,151 +1620,151 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-provisions">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>Structural surplus: Budget balance target maintained</li>
 <li>Defence spending: Continued increase to NATO 2% target</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-risk">Legislative Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-risk">Legislative Risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-risk"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Must pass FiU committee first reading (expected 2026-05-06)</li>
 <li>Coalition vote: M+SD+KD+L = 176 seats (1 seat majority)</li>
 <li>Risk of SD demanding amendments to fiscal relief component before final vote</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>HD03100 is the PIR-1 anchor: if Q1 GDP release (SCB, May 2026) confirms ≥1.5% growth, the Vårpropositionen narrative holds. If GDP is negative, the document becomes the government's primary vulnerability.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03231">HD03231<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03231"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03231 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-1">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03231/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03231/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-1">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-1">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-1"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03236">HD03236<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03236"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03236 | <strong>Type</strong>: Ändringsbudget | <strong>Level</strong>: L3 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-2">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>An extra ändringsbudget providing emergency cost-of-living relief via fuel tax reductions and electricity/gas price support for households and businesses.</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03236/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03236/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 9/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1">Political Significance [DIW: 9/10 | Admiralty: B1]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-910--admiralty-b1"></a></h3>
 <p>This is the most politically contentious fiscal document in the sprint. Its use of the extra ändringsbudget instrument signals urgency and executive action. It is the primary visible concession to SD's cost-of-living demands.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-2">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-2">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Reduced drivmedelsskatt (fuel excise) estimated at 0.50–1.00 SEK/litre</li>
 <li>Electricity price support for households above a consumption threshold</li>
 <li>Gas price relief mechanism</li>
 <li>Total estimated fiscal cost: 5–8 billion SEK (based on typical relief scope)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-significance-1">Intelligence Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p>The H3 hypothesis (SD ultimatum) in devils-advocate.md finds its primary support in this document. The extraordinary use of an extra ändringsbudget for what is essentially a routine relief measure suggests a political forcing event.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03237">HD03237<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03237"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03237-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03237 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-3">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03237/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03237/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-1"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-3">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-3">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-3"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-1">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-1">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03238">HD03238<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03238"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03238 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-4">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03238/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03238/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-2"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-4">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-4">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-4"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-2">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-2">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03239">HD03239<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03239"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03239 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-5">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03239/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03239/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-3"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-5">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-5">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-5"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-3">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-3">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03240">HD03240<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03240"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03240 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2+ | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-6">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Comprehensive legislation restructuring the Swedish electricity grid regulatory framework, including new balancing rules, consumer rights, and grid capacity planning mandates.</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03240/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03240/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2">Political Significance [DIW: 8/10 | Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2">Political Significance [DIW: 8/10 | Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-diw-810--admiralty-b2"></a></h3>
 <p>Part of the integrated energy reform trilogy (HD03238+HD03239+HD03240). The broadest cross-party support among all three — even V and MP are likely to support or abstain. Aligns with EU electricity market reform agenda.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-6">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-6">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>New balancing mechanism requirements for grid operators</li>
 <li>Enhanced consumer rights for commercial electricity buyers</li>
 <li>Long-term grid capacity planning obligation for Svenska kraftnät</li>
 <li>Smart meter data access standards</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710">Implementation Feasibility [Score: 7/10]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710">Implementation Feasibility [Score: 7/10]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility-score-710"></a></h3>
 <p>Svenska kraftnät has existing capacity. Primary risk is industry consultation phase extending timelines.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-hd03246">HD03246<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd03246"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>dok_id</strong>: HD03246 | <strong>Type</strong>: Proposition | <strong>Level</strong>: L2 | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04</p>
-<h2 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-summary-7">Document Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>See significance-scoring.md for DIW ranking. This document is part of the April 2026 legislative sprint (riksmöte 2025/26).</p>
 <p><strong>URL</strong>: <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03246/">https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/HD03246/</a></p>
-<h2 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4">Political Significance [Admiralty: B2]<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-political-significance-admiralty-b2-4"></a></h3>
 <p>This proposition is part of the integrated legislative package described in synthesis-summary.md.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-provisions-7">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-provisions-7">Key Provisions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-provisions-7"></a></h3>
 <p>See cross-reference-map.md for legislative chain membership and stakeholder-perspectives.md for coalition position analysis.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-intelligence-note-4">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-intelligence-note-4">Intelligence Note<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-note-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Detailed analysis of this document is integrated into the Family A synthesis artifacts. See significance-scoring.md for evidence-based DIW score.</p>
 <h3 id="rm-cluster-remaining">cluster-remaining<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-remaining"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Cluster</strong>: HD03242, HD03232, HD03233, HD03234, HD03243, HD03244, HD03245, HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD0399, HD03104</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cluster-overview">Cluster Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cluster-overview">Cluster Overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cluster-overview"></a></h3>
 <p>These 12 documents complement the 8 top-priority propositions analyzed individually. They are grouped by policy domain.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation">Sub-cluster A: International Law &#x26; Cooperation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation">Sub-cluster A: International Law &#x26; Cooperation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-a-international-law--cooperation"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03232</strong> — Ukraine international compensation commission (companion to HD03231 tribunal accession)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03233</strong> — International treaty measure (companion)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03234</strong> — Europol protocol — Swedish participation in enhanced enforcement cooperation</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: All three have near-unanimous Riksdag support. HD03232 and HD03231 form an integrated Ukraine accountability framework. See coalition-mathematics.md for voting pattern.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice">Sub-cluster B: Criminal Justice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice">Sub-cluster B: Criminal Justice<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-b-criminal-justice"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03252</strong> — Detention conditions reform (SiS capacity + EU compliance)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03253</strong> — Court process reform — companion to juvenile justice package (HD03246)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03245</strong> — Criminal sanction reform</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: These three form the secondary layer of the "rule of law sprint" (see cross-reference-map.md). They add depth to the M/SD/KD electoral narrative on safety.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use">Sub-cluster C: Environment &#x26; Land Use<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use">Sub-cluster C: Environment &#x26; Land Use<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-c-environment--land-use"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03242</strong> — Forestry regulation reform (EU deforestation regulation compatibility)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03243</strong> — Land management reform</li>
 <li><strong>HD03244</strong> — Rural property rights</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: HD03242 is the most contentious in this cluster — faces EU Commission compatibility scrutiny under the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). Risk of formal EU notification.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms">Sub-cluster D: Budget Mechanisms<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms">Sub-cluster D: Budget Mechanisms<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-d-budget-mechanisms"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD0399</strong> — Spring amendment budget (riksmöte 2025/26 formal vehicle)</li>
 <li><strong>HD03104</strong> — Supplementary budget mechanism</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Fiscal implementation vehicles for HD03100/HD03236 policy objectives. High procedural significance, low political drama.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous">Sub-cluster E: Miscellaneous<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous">Sub-cluster E: Miscellaneous<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sub-cluster-e-miscellaneous"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD03256</strong> — Administrative reform (Statskontoret delegation area)</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Assessment</strong>: Low political visibility; implementation efficiency in government operations.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-admiralty-assessment">Admiralty Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-admiralty-assessment"></a></h3>
 <p>[B2] for all documents in this cluster — secondary legislative significance confirmed by riksdagen.se publication dates and cross-committee referral patterns.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Election</strong>: Sweden General Election, September 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run">Current Seat Projections (2026-Q1 estimates; no new polling in this run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run">Current Seat Projections (2026-Q1 estimates; no new polling in this run)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run"></a></h3>
 <p>Based on polling through Q1 2026 (Novus/Sifo tracking, most recent available):</p>
 
 
@@ -1844,14 +1844,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-seat-projections-2026-q1-estimates-no-new-polling-in-this-run
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>2022 Seats</th><th>Q1 2026 Polling Est.</th><th>Change</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Socialdemokraterna (S)</td><td>107</td><td>~112</td><td>+5</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>73</td><td>~68</td><td>-5</td><td>Tidö support</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>68</td><td>~66</td><td>-2</td><td>Tidö core</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>24</td><td>~26</td><td>+2</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>24</td><td>~27</td><td>+3</td><td>Swing/Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>19</td><td>~17</td><td>-2</td><td>Tidö core</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD) [above]</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Liberalerna (L)</td><td>16</td><td>~14</td><td>-2</td><td>Tidö core</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>18</td><td>~19</td><td>+1</td><td>Opposition</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Bloc estimate</strong>: Tidö (M+SD+KD+L): ~165 seats | S-bloc (S+V+MP+C): ~184 seats
 <strong>Threshold concerns</strong>: KD (17) and L (14) both approaching 4% threshold</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026">Key Electoral Variables for May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026">Key Electoral Variables for May–September 2026<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-electoral-variables-for-mayseptember-2026"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Q1 GDP release</strong> (PIR-1): If ≥ 0%, reduces S-bloc economic advantage by ~3pp</li>
 <li><strong>Crime statistics</strong> (May 2026 BRÅ release): Tidö's strongest electoral ground</li>
 <li><strong>Energy prices</strong> (electricity spot price trajectory): Direct voter sentiment impact</li>
 <li><strong>SD moderation signals</strong>: SD may make tactical moderation moves to attract centre-right swing voters</li>
 </ol>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election">Coalition Formation Scenarios Post-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election">Coalition Formation Scenarios Post-Election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1895,9 +1895,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-formation-scenarios-post-election">Coalition Formation Scen
     "Hung parliament" : 10
     "C joins Tidö" : 5</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Riksdag</strong>: 349 seats | <strong>Majority threshold</strong>: 175</p>
-<h2 id="rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate">Current Tidö Vote Distribution (2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate">Current Tidö Vote Distribution (2022 mandate)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1934,7 +1934,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-current-tidö-vote-distribution-2022-mandate">Current Tidö Vote Dist
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Coalition role</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>68</td><td>Core — PM</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>73</td><td>Support — budget negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>19</td><td>Core</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>16</td><td>Core</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Tidö total</strong></td><td><strong>176</strong></td><td>1 seat majority</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution">May 2026 Legislative Votes — Expected Ja/Nej Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution">May 2026 Legislative Votes — Expected Ja/Nej Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-may-2026-legislative-votes--expected-janej-distribution">May 2026 Leg
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Proposition</th><th>M</th><th>SD</th><th>KD</th><th>L</th><th>S</th><th>V</th><th>MP</th><th>C</th><th>Expected outcome</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100 Vårpropositionen</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Abstains</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236 Emergency budget</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Abstains</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 Electricity</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (≥190 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239 Wind revenue</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Abstains</td><td>Nej</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (≥185 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237 Police education</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Abstains</td><td>Abstains</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (≥200 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246 Juvenile justice</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231 Ukraine tribunal</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td><strong>Near-unanimous</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HD03238 Env authority</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Ja</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td>Nej</td><td><strong>Passes</strong> (176 Ja)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: Seat counts are 2022 election values. Frånvarande/abstention patterns typical; effective majority may differ. C party position on HD03239 (wind revenue) is assumed supportive based on rural energy interests but not formally confirmed.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis">Threshold Vulnerability Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis">Threshold Vulnerability Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Tidö Coalition: Vote Margin per Key Vote"
@@ -2059,8 +2059,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-threshold-vulnerability-analysis">Threshold Vulnerability Analysis<a
     bar [1, 1, 15, 25, 60, 1]</pre>
 <p><strong>Critical observation</strong>: Four of the eight key May votes have a projected margin of just 1 seat (176 seats = threshold 175 + 1). A single MP absence or SD rebellion on any of these votes creates a forced revote. This is the primary legislative risk for May 2026.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint">Key Segments Relevant to Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint">Key Segments Relevant to Legislative Sprint<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2123,9 +2123,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-segments-relevant-to-legislative-sprint">Key Segments Relevant to
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Segment</th><th>Size est.</th><th>Current alignment</th><th>Policy driver</th><th>Legislative response</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Southern Sweden working class</td><td>~12%</td><td>SD lean</td><td>Cost of living, fuel</td><td>HD03236 (fuel relief)</td></tr><tr><td>Urban knowledge workers</td><td>~18%</td><td>S+MP lean</td><td>Climate, housing</td><td>HD03238 (env authority) — negative reaction likely</td></tr><tr><td>Rural energy communities</td><td>~6%</td><td>M/C</td><td>Energy prices, wind revenue</td><td>HD03239 (wind municipality revenue)</td></tr><tr><td>Security-concerned suburban</td><td>~15%</td><td>M+SD</td><td>Crime, juvenile justice</td><td>HD03237, HD03246</td></tr><tr><td>Nordic solidarity left</td><td>~8%</td><td>S+V+MP</td><td>Ukraine, rule of law</td><td>HD03231/232 (Ukraine)</td></tr><tr><td>SME entrepreneurs</td><td>~7%</td><td>M</td><td>Business regulation, energy costs</td><td>HD03240 (electricity)</td></tr><tr><td>Young voters 18–29</td><td>~10%</td><td>S+MP</td><td>Climate, housing, jobs</td><td>No direct legislative response in this sprint</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging">Implications for May–August Campaign Messaging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging">Implications for May–August Campaign Messaging<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implications-for-mayaugust-campaign-messaging"></a></h3>
 <p>The legislative sprint targets the Southern working class (HD03236), security-concerned suburban (HD03237/HD03246), and rural energy (HD03239) segments most precisely. The young voter segment (10%) is notably absent from the legislative priorities — a structural gap that could become a S/MP attack surface.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-regional-analysis"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 pie title Voter Segment Targeting Reach
     "Southern working class (SD)" : 12
@@ -2134,11 +2134,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-regional-analysis">Regional Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
     "SME (M)" : 7
     "Untargeted segments" : 60</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Nordic peers (Denmark, Norway, Finland) + Germany + UK (post-Labour)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-outside-in-framework">Outside-In Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-framework"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-outside-in-framework">Outside-In Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-outside-in-framework"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's current political-economic positioning is assessed against comparable democratic governance systems facing similar structural pressures.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-analysis"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2188,27 +2188,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-analysis">Comparator Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>GDP Growth 2025</th><th>Election Context</th><th>Policy Parallelism</th><th>Key Divergence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sweden (SWE)</strong></td><td>~+1.0% (2025 est.)</td><td>September 2026</td><td>Baseline</td><td>Recession longer than peers</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Denmark (DNK)</strong></td><td>~+2.2%</td><td>No near-term election</td><td>Energy transition advanced</td><td>Higher wage growth</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Norway (NOR)</strong></td><td>~+1.8%</td><td>No near-term election</td><td>Oil fund buffers shocks</td><td>No structural reform pressure</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Finland (FIN)</strong></td><td>~-0.5% (2024)→ recovery</td><td>2027 election horizon</td><td>Fiscal consolidation similar</td><td>NATO neighbour parallel on Ukraine</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Germany (DEU)</strong></td><td>~-0.2% (2025)→ stagnation</td><td>Post-2025 Bundestag coalition</td><td>Energy reform comparison</td><td>Coalition complexity comparable</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><em>Note: GDP figures are approximate based on IMF WEO Apr-2026 context. Admiralty [C2] for cross-country estimates.</em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-detailed-comparator-profiles">Detailed Comparator Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-comparator-profiles"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform">Denmark — Model for Pre-Election Energy Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-detailed-comparator-profiles">Detailed Comparator Profiles<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-detailed-comparator-profiles"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform">Denmark — Model for Pre-Election Energy Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-denmark--model-for-pre-election-energy-reform"></a></h4>
 <p>Denmark's revenue-sharing model for offshore wind (Havmøllefond) predates Sweden's HD03239 by six years. Danish municipalities hosting offshore wind receive substantial fiscal compensation, with studies showing ~30% local approval increase. Sweden's HD03239 adopts a similar principle but focuses on onshore revenue sharing. <strong>Lesson</strong>: Denmark's early adoption shows the policy works at reducing local opposition; Sweden's implementation timing (pre-election) accelerates the political benefit timeline.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative">Finland — Parallel Fiscal Austerity Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative">Finland — Parallel Fiscal Austerity Narrative<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-finland--parallel-fiscal-austerity-narrative"></a></h4>
 <p>Finland entered fiscal consolidation in 2024 under PM Orpo (Kokoomus-led coalition), implementing spending cuts and tax increases. Sweden's Tidö government has avoided Finnish-scale austerity, but both face the same political challenge: structural deficits require consolidation while recession constrains household spending. Finland's experience shows that consolidation with strong rule-of-law reform can maintain coalition stability. <strong>Sweden comparison</strong>: Sweden's spring budget is less austere than Finland's; the political risk is lower but the long-term fiscal trajectory raises similar questions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison">Germany — Environmental Permitting Reform Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison">Germany — Environmental Permitting Reform Comparison<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-germany--environmental-permitting-reform-comparison"></a></h4>
 <p>Germany's Bundesimmissionsschutzgesetz (BImSchG) reform (2023) and the establishment of the Bundesnetzagentur's new fast-track permitting function parallels Sweden's HD03238 (new environmental review authority). Germany achieved a 40% reduction in wind energy permit processing time (18→11 months average) within two years of institutional reform. <strong>Sweden comparison</strong>: HD03238 targets similar efficiency gains. Germany's implementation shows a 12–18 month lag before measurable improvement — Sweden's new authority is unlikely to show results before the September 2026 election.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery">UK (post-Labour 2024) — Crime-Focused Pre-Election Delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery">UK (post-Labour 2024) — Crime-Focused Pre-Election Delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-uk-post-labour-2024--crime-focused-pre-election-delivery"></a></h4>
 <p>Labour's 2024 manifesto focused on "neighbourhood policing" and justice system reform. Sweden's HD03237 (paid police education) parallels UK's recruitment-first police strategy, though Sweden's approach is more structured. The UK experience shows that police reform announcements have a 6–12 month lag before voter impact. Sweden's announcement in April 2026 may not translate to voter perception change before September.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy">Nordic Horizontal Comparison: Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy">Nordic Horizontal Comparison: Energy Policy<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-nordic-horizontal-comparison-energy-policy"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 xychart-beta
     title "Nordic Energy Reform Progress Index (0-10)"
     x-axis ["Sweden 2026", "Denmark 2026", "Norway 2026", "Finland 2026"]
     y-axis "Reform Progress" 0 --> 10
     bar [6.5, 9.2, 7.8, 5.5]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-key-analytical-finding">Key Analytical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-analytical-finding"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-analytical-finding">Key Analytical Finding<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-analytical-finding"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden is neither the Nordic leader nor the laggard in this pre-election reform sprint. It is executing a broadly coherent centre-right reform agenda under greater political time pressure (imminent election) than comparable Nordic governments. The primary distinguishing feature is the co-occurrence of economic fragility and legislative ambition — a combination that creates higher delivery risk than in Denmark or Norway.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010">Primary Parallel: Reinfeldt Alliance Government Spring Sprint 2010<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010">Primary Parallel: Reinfeldt Alliance Government Spring Sprint 2010<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: April–June 2010 | <strong>Similarity score</strong>: 78/100</p>
 <p><strong>Conditions in 2010</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-primary-parallel-reinfeldt-alliance-government-spring-sprint-2010">Pr
 <p><strong>Key difference</strong>: In 2010, the Alliance ran on a completed record of economic recovery (GDP +6.6% 2010). In 2026, Tidö is running on a <em>projected</em> recovery with actual GDP still uncertain. This makes 2026 riskier electorally than 2010.</p>
 <p><strong>2010 outcome</strong>: Alliance won the September 2010 election. GDP performance was the decisive factor. The pre-election legislative sprint signalled competence without producing headline-making reforms.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: The model works if GDP data cooperates. If Q1 2026 GDP is negative, the 2010 parallel breaks down and the relevant parallel shifts to Persson 2006 (see below).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case">Secondary Parallel: Persson Social Democrat Government 2006 (Failure Case)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case">Secondary Parallel: Persson Social Democrat Government 2006 (Failure Case)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-case"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: Spring 2006 | <strong>Similarity score</strong>: 42/100</p>
 <p><strong>Conditions in 2006</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2240,7 +2240,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-secondary-parallel-persson-social-democrat-government-2006-failure-ca
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Outcome</strong>: Alliance won. The legislative sprint did not save the government. The macroeconomic record was the dominant factor.</p>
 <p><strong>Lesson for 2026</strong>: If the unemployment rate (currently ~8–9%) does not show measurable decline before September, the Persson 2006 parallel becomes more relevant than the Reinfeldt 2010 parallel.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk">Tertiary Parallel: Reinfeldt Government 2014 (Narrow Majority Risk)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk">Tertiary Parallel: Reinfeldt Government 2014 (Narrow Majority Risk)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Period</strong>: 2013–2014 | <strong>Similarity score</strong>: 55/100</p>
 <p><strong>Conditions in 2014</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2256,9 +2256,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-tertiary-parallel-reinfeldt-government-2014-narrow-majority-risk">Ter
     y-axis "Similarity Score" 0 --> 100
     bar [78, 55, 42]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment">High-Priority Reform Feasibility Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority">1. HD03238 — New Environmental Review Authority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment">High-Priority Reform Feasibility Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-high-priority-reform-feasibility-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority">1. HD03238 — New Environmental Review Authority<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: HIGH delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-1-hd03238--new-environmental-review-authority">1. HD03238 — New Env
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Institutional capacity</td><td>Requires new Länsstyrelse coordination structure; ~200 FTE estimated</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Law proposed for 2026; implementation likely 2027</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>Naturskyddsföreningen court challenge expected (PIR-4)</td></tr><tr><td>Budget allocation</td><td>Not explicitly specified in HD03238 text</td></tr><tr><td>EU compatibility</td><td>Must comply with EIA Directive 2011/92/EU</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 4/10 for 2026 delivery, 7/10 for 2027 implementation
 <strong>Key constraint</strong>: Institution-building cannot be accelerated beyond recruitment capacity</p>
-<h3 id="rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws">2. HD03240 — Electricity System Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws">2. HD03240 — Electricity System Laws<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: MEDIUM delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-2-hd03240--electricity-system-laws">2. HD03240 — Electricity System
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Regulatory authority</td><td>Svenska kraftnät has existing capacity</td></tr><tr><td>Technical complexity</td><td>Grid balancing rules require industry consultation</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Proposed implementation Jan 2027</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>Low — cross-party support reduces challenge probability</td></tr><tr><td>Budget allocation</td><td>Primarily regulatory framework; limited new budget</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 7/10 for 2027 delivery
 <strong>Key constraint</strong>: Industry stakeholder alignment (Energiföretagen, Vattenfall) required for implementation rules</p>
-<h3 id="rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education">3. HD03237 — Paid Police Education<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education">3. HD03237 — Paid Police Education<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: LOW delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-3-hd03237--paid-police-education">3. HD03237 — Paid Police Educatio
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Institutional capacity</td><td>Polisutbildning already has infrastructure</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Proposed implementation Q1 2027</td></tr><tr><td>Budget</td><td>HC01FiU24 includes education budget allocation</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>None expected</td></tr><tr><td>Recruitment capacity</td><td>Primary constraint — Polishögskolan has limited throughput</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 8/10 for 2027 delivery
 <strong>Key constraint</strong>: Physical capacity of Polishögskolan campuses; may require new facility investment</p>
-<h3 id="rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing">4. HD03239 — Wind Revenue Municipality Sharing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing">4. HD03239 — Wind Revenue Municipality Sharing<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: LOW-MEDIUM delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2393,7 +2393,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-4-hd03239--wind-revenue-municipality-sharing">4. HD03239 — Wind Rev
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Factor</th><th>Assessment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Technical complexity</td><td>Revenue calculation mechanism requires SKV (Skatteverket) implementation</td></tr><tr><td>Timeline</td><td>Proposed 2027 revenue sharing from 2026 installations</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder buy-in</td><td>Municipal association (SKL) broadly supportive</td></tr><tr><td>Legal challenges</td><td>Low — revenue sharing models have precedent</td></tr><tr><td>Retroactivity risk</td><td>Only forward-looking; no retroactive claims</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Feasibility score</strong>: 7/10</p>
-<h3 id="rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform">5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform">5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice Reform<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Risk rating</strong>: MEDIUM delivery risk</p>
 
 
@@ -2433,11 +2433,11 @@ <h3 id="rm-5-hd03246--juvenile-justice-reform">5. HD03246 — Juvenile Justice R
     y-axis "Feasibility" 0 --> 10
     bar [4, 7, 8, 7, 6]</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-ach-matrix">ACH Matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-matrix"></a></h3>
 <p>Three primary competing hypotheses are evaluated against the evidence base.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view">Hypothesis H1: The Legislative Sprint Is Genuine Governance Reform (Mainstream View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view">Hypothesis H1: The Legislative Sprint Is Genuine Governance Reform (Mainstream View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mainstream-view"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The April 2026 legislative package represents coherent policy delivery — a government executing its mandate across multiple domains with genuine long-term reform intent, not merely election positioning.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-legislative-sprint-is-genuine-governance-reform-mai
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH diagnostic</strong>: H1 is partially true — technical reforms (energy, environmental) are genuine; fiscal relief measures are election-motivated. H1 scores 6/10 as a complete explanation.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view">Hypothesis H2: The Government Is in Pre-Election Panic Mode (Alternative View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view">Hypothesis H2: The Government Is in Pre-Election Panic Mode (Alternative View)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternative-view"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The legislative sprint reflects internal awareness that the government's economic record is weak and voters are dissatisfied, prompting a rush of visible deliverables before the summer recess closes the window for action.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2470,7 +2470,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-the-government-is-in-pre-election-panic-mode-alternativ
 </ul>
 <p><strong>ACH diagnostic</strong>: H2 explains the timing anomalies better than H1 but overstates the panic element. H2 scores 7.5/10 as a complete explanation. <strong>Most likely: H2 is correct on fiscal measures; H1 is correct on structural reforms.</strong></p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team">Hypothesis H3: The Coalition Is Managing a Silent SD Ultimatum (Red Team)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team">Hypothesis H3: The Coalition Is Managing a Silent SD Ultimatum (Red Team)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-team"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Statement</strong>: The emergency fuel/energy relief budget (HD03236) is a direct response to an SD ultimatum delivered in private — SD signalled it would abstain on the spring budget framework unless household cost relief was accelerated.</p>
 <p><strong>Supporting evidence</strong>:</p>
 <ul>
@@ -2487,7 +2487,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-the-coalition-is-managing-a-silent-sd-ultimatum-red-tea
 <p><strong>ACH diagnostic</strong>: H3 is unprovable but plausible. If true, it is the most important intelligence finding of this cycle — it suggests the Tidö coalition is more fragile than its outward unity suggests. H3 scores 5/10 certainty but HIGH consequence if confirmed.</p>
 <p><strong>Red Team challenge</strong>: Assume H3 is true. What does this mean? It means SD has already exercised budget leverage once. The probability of a second SD demand increases. The fiscal cost of coalition maintenance rises. The government's macro-fiscal credibility is directly traded against coalition survival.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-rejected-hypotheses">Rejected Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypotheses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-rejected-hypotheses">Rejected Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-rejected-hypotheses"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>H4 (Government will call early election)</strong>: Rejected. No constitutional basis; election is September 2026 by schedule; no party has incentive for early call.</li>
 <li><strong>H5 (Ukraine propositions will fail)</strong>: Rejected. Cross-party consensus confirmed; H5 score 1/10.</li>
@@ -2502,9 +2502,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-rejected-hypotheses">Rejected Hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true
     style H3 fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style C fill:#1a1e3d,color:#e0e0e0</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-framework">7-Dimension Classification Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-framework"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-1-policy-domain">Dimension 1: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-policy-domain"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification-framework">7-Dimension Classification Framework<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification-framework"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-1-policy-domain">Dimension 1: Policy Domain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-1-policy-domain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary</strong>: Economic/Fiscal Policy (HD03100, HD03236, HD0399, HD03253)</li>
 <li><strong>Secondary</strong>: Criminal Justice (HD03246, HD03237, HD03252)</li>
@@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-1-policy-domain">Dimension 1: Policy Domain<a class="" aria
 <li><strong>Quaternary</strong>: Foreign/Security Policy (HD03231, HD03232)</li>
 <li><strong>Quinary</strong>: Social/Welfare (HD03245, HD03244)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-2-political-alignment">Dimension 2: Political Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-political-alignment"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-2-political-alignment">Dimension 2: Political Alignment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-2-political-alignment"></a></h4>
 
 
 
@@ -2554,39 +2554,39 @@ <h3 id="rm-dimension-2-political-alignment">Dimension 2: Political Alignment<a c
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Block</th><th>Propositions Favoured</th><th>Opposition Focus</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M/KD/L (Alliansen)</td><td>Justice reform, deregulation (HD03242), fiscal framework</td><td>Fiscal sufficiency questions</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Fuel relief (HD03236), justice (HD03246, HD03237), prison restrictions (HD03252)</td><td>Any dilution of criminal justice</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Critiques inadequacy of relief; demands more welfare spending</td><td>HD03236 (not enough), HD03242 (too permissive)</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Energy support policies (HD03239, HD03240 conditionally)</td><td>HD03242 (forestry), HD03238 (too fast)</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>All relief inadequate; demand wealth redistribution</td><td>HD03252, HD03246 (rights concerns)</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Support deregulation (HD03242), rural infrastructure</td><td>Mixed on justice</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity">Dimension 3: Constitutional/Legal Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity">Dimension 3: Constitutional/Legal Sensitivity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-3-constitutionallegal-sensitivity"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>High</strong>: HD03246 (juvenile rights, ECHR Art. 6), HD03252 (welfare state principles)</li>
 <li><strong>Medium</strong>: HD03238 (administrative law restructuring), HD03240 (electricity market regulation)</li>
 <li><strong>Low</strong>: HD03231, HD03232 (treaty accession, straightforward ratification)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance">Dimension 4: EU/International Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance">Dimension 4: EU/International Compliance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-4-euinternational-compliance"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03253 (EU Banking Package): mandatory EU transposition</li>
 <li>HD03244 (Interoperability): EU Data Act compliance</li>
 <li>HD03238 (Environmental review): EU EIA Directive implications</li>
 <li>HD03231, HD03232: UN/EU rule-of-law architecture</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election">Dimension 5: Electoral Salience (5 months to election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election">Dimension 5: Electoral Salience (5 months to election)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-5-electoral-salience-5-months-to-election"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Maximum salience</strong>: HD03236 (fuel/energy cost), HD03100 (economic direction), HD03237 (police), HD03246 (crime)</li>
 <li><strong>Moderate salience</strong>: HD03239 (rural energy), HD03238 (permitting speed), HD03242 (forestry)</li>
 <li><strong>Low salience</strong>: HD03253, HD03244, HD03256 (technical)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity">Dimension 6: Implementation Complexity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity">Dimension 6: Implementation Complexity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-6-implementation-complexity"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Complex (18+ months)</strong>: HD03238 (new authority establishment), HD03240 (electricity system overhaul)</li>
 <li><strong>Medium (6–18 months)</strong>: HD03237 (education funding system), HD03239 (revenue distribution mechanism)</li>
 <li><strong>Simple (&#x3C;6 months)</strong>: HD03236 (tax change), HD03252 (legal restriction), HD03231/232 (treaty ratification)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR/ISMS)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms">Dimension 7: Data Classification (GDPR/ISMS)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dimension-7-data-classification-gdprisms"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>All documents: PUBLIC data [PUBLIC classification]</li>
 <li>Source: data.riksdagen.se (Offentlighetsprincipen applies)</li>
 <li>GDPR basis: Art. 9(2)(e) publicly made; Art. 9(2)(g) substantial public interest</li>
 <li>No DPIA required; no personal data processed</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-tiers"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2628,14 +2628,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-priority-tiers">Priority Tiers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
     "Infrastructure" : 2
     "Technical/Regulatory" : 1</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Tier-C Cross-Type Synthesis</strong> | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement">Sibling Analysis Folders (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement">Sibling Analysis Folders (Tier-C Requirement)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-tier-c-requirement"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Primary sibling</strong>: <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/</code> — all 23 artifacts present; same-day companion analysis covering full April 2026 review period</li>
 <li>This month-ahead analysis MUST be read in conjunction with the monthly-review folder for a complete intelligence picture</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review">Cross-Reference with Monthly-Review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review">Cross-Reference with Monthly-Review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2672,32 +2672,32 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-with-monthly-review">Cross-Reference with Monthly-Rev
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Theme</th><th>Monthly-Review Assessment</th><th>Month-Ahead Forward Projection</th><th>Convergence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Coalition stability</td><td>Assessed April-2026 coalition dynamics</td><td>SD remains in coalition through September 2026 [HIGH]</td><td>✅ Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Energy reform</td><td>April review covers legislative passage tracking</td><td>May-ahead: HD03240/HD03239 expected passage</td><td>✅ Consistent</td></tr><tr><td>Economic recovery</td><td>April GDP context</td><td>Q1 GDP release is PIR-1 for May</td><td>✅ Continuous</td></tr><tr><td>Ukraine instruments</td><td>April foreign policy review</td><td>HD03231/232 ratification expected May</td><td>✅ Consistent</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters">Legislative Cross-Reference: Document Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain">Energy Policy Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters">Legislative Cross-Reference: Document Clusters<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-legislative-cross-reference-document-clusters"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain">Energy Policy Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-energy-policy-legislative-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03240 → Electricity System Laws → links to HD03239 (wind revenue) → links to HD03238 (env authority)</li>
 <li>These three form an integrated energy infrastructure reform package; amendments to one will likely affect the others</li>
 <li>See significance-scoring.md: HD03240 (DIW 9/10), HD03239 (DIW 7/10), HD03238 (DIW 6/10)</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain">Security and Justice Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain">Security and Justice Legislative Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-security-and-justice-legislative-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03237 (paid police education) → HD03246 (juvenile justice) → HD03252 (detention conditions)</li>
 <li>These form a "rule of law sprint" addressing the full crime-policing chain</li>
 <li>See stakeholder-perspectives.md: SD and M share leadership on this chain; KD provides credibility</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain">Budget and Fiscal Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain">Budget and Fiscal Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-budget-and-fiscal-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03100 (Vårpropositionen 2026) → HD03236 (emergency ändringsbudget) → HD0399 (spring amendment)</li>
 <li>HD03100 is the macro framework; HD03236 is the SD-facing concession layer; HD0399 provides legislative basis</li>
 <li>Fiscal coherence: these three must be read together; surface contradictions between HD03100 macro-targets and HD03236 fiscal cost</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-international-commitments-chain">International Commitments Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-commitments-chain"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-international-commitments-chain">International Commitments Chain<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-international-commitments-chain"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>HD03231 (Ukraine tribunal accession) → HD03232 (Ukraine compensation commission) → HD03234 (Europol protocol)</li>
 <li>Aligns Sweden's international legal posture post-NATO; all three have near-zero domestic opposition</li>
 <li>Cross-reference: monthly-review covers the diplomatic context of these commitments</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-map">Policy Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-policy-cluster-map">Policy Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-policy-cluster-map"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">%%{init: {'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#00d9ff', 'secondaryColor': '#ff006e', 'tertiaryColor': '#1a1e3d'}}}%%
 flowchart TD
     VP["HD03100\nVårproposition"]
@@ -2724,7 +2724,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-policy-cluster-map">Policy Cluster Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
     style EL fill:#00d9ff,color:#000
     style POL fill:#ffbe0b,color:#000
     style UKT fill:#00d9ff,color:#000</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references">Analysis Artifact Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references">Analysis Artifact Cross-References<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2762,55 +2762,55 @@ <h2 id="rm-analysis-artifact-cross-references">Analysis Artifact Cross-Reference
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Artifact</th><th>Key Link</th><th>Forward Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>executive-brief.md</td><td>BLUF cites HD03100 + HD03236</td><td>Feeds article.md headline and meta</td></tr><tr><td>scenario-analysis.md</td><td>Scenario B (45%) assumes Q1 GDP ≥ 0%</td><td>PIR-1 in intelligence-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>coalition-mathematics.md</td><td>Seat counts from 2022 election</td><td>Updated by election-2026-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>historical-parallels.md</td><td>Reinfeldt 2010 as best parallel</td><td>Informs risk-assessment.md Risk-3</td></tr><tr><td>swot-analysis.md</td><td>All 4 quadrants cite dok_ids</td><td>Feeds significance-scoring.md ranking</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Review type</strong>: AI FIRST Pass 2 retrospective</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer">Standard 1 — Proper Disclaimer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">§ICD 203 Audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer">Standard 1 — Proper Disclaimer<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-1--proper-disclaimer"></a></h4>
 <p>Analytical judgments in this report reflect the analyst's assessment and do not represent official government positions. Confidence levels follow the Intelligence Community Directive 203 and Admiralty Code.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-2--source-summary">Standard 2 — Source Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2--source-summary"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-2--source-summary">Standard 2 — Source Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-2--source-summary"></a></h4>
 <p>Primary sources: Riksdagen API (riksdag-regering MCP), doktyp <code>prop</code>, riksmöte 2025/26. 20 primary legislative documents downloaded. MCP health: live. No external intelligence sources. Economic context from HC01FiU20/FiU24 [riksdagen.se] committee reports. No classified, hacked, or private data used.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-3--uncertainties">Standard 3 — Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3--uncertainties"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-3--uncertainties">Standard 3 — Uncertainties<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-3--uncertainties"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li>Economic GDP trajectory: LOW confidence on precise Q1 2026 figure (no SCB release yet)</li>
 <li>SD internal deliberations: no primary source; inferred from public statements and structural incentives</li>
 <li>German/Danish comparator GDP figures: approximate, based on IMF WEO Apr-2026 context [Admiralty C2]</li>
 <li>Media framing data: no systematic media monitoring; qualitative assessment only</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence">Standard 4 — Distinguished Analysis from Intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence">Standard 4 — Distinguished Analysis from Intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-4--distinguished-analysis-from-intelligence"></a></h4>
 <p>All 5 Key Judgments in intelligence-assessment.md are explicitly marked as analytical assessments, not confirmed facts. The "H3: SD Ultimatum" scenario is explicitly red-teamed and marked unprovable.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-5--analyst-identity">Standard 5 — Analyst Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5--analyst-identity"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-5--analyst-identity">Standard 5 — Analyst Identity<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-5--analyst-identity"></a></h4>
 <p>All analysis attributed to: James Pether Sörling, Riksdagsmonitor. No anonymous claims. AI-assisted analysis subject to human review per Hack23 AI Policy.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions">Standard 6 — Analytical Assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions">Standard 6 — Analytical Assumptions<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-6--analytical-assumptions"></a></h4>
 <p>Explicitly documented in intelligence-assessment.md (Key Assumptions Check table). Four assumptions identified, with sensitivity ratings.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination">Standard 7 — Context for Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination">Standard 7 — Context for Dissemination<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-7--context-for-dissemination"></a></h4>
 <p>Public intelligence product. GDPR Art. 9(2)(e)/(g) lawful basis for political opinion references. All politicians named are in public roles performing official functions.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology">Standard 8 — Analytic Terminology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology">Standard 8 — Analytic Terminology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-8--analytic-terminology"></a></h4>
 <p>WEP terms used: "Very likely", "Likely", "Roughly even", "Unlikely" — drawn from canon in political-style-guide.md. Admirable Code ratings [A-F][1-6] applied in evidence tables. Banned term "probable" not used.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-standard-9--calibration">Standard 9 — Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9--calibration"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-standard-9--calibration">Standard 9 — Calibration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-standard-9--calibration"></a></h4>
 <p>Scenario probabilities sum to 100% (25+45+20+10). Key Judgments paired with specific PIR triggers. One scenario (Scenario D, 10%) explicitly assigned as low-probability catastrophic risk.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2">Named Methodology Improvements (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth">Improvement 1 — Economic Data Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2">Named Methodology Improvements (Pass 2)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-named-methodology-improvements-pass-2"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth">Improvement 1 — Economic Data Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1--economic-data-depth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: This analysis relies on HC01FiU20 committee reports for economic context rather than direct IMF WEO data. The IMF CLI (<code>scripts/imf-fetch.ts</code>) should have been invoked.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: Economic data assertions in executive-brief.md and stakeholder-perspectives.md strengthened with explicit vintage notation. Full IMF data call deferred due to session time pressure but piped Admiralty rating downgraded for unverified figures from [B2] to [C2].</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Next month-ahead run should call <code>npx tsx scripts/imf-fetch.ts weo --country SWE --indicator NGDP_RPCH --years 5 --persist</code> at the start of the data download phase, before legislative document analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap">Improvement 2 — SD Internal Deliberation Evidence Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap">Improvement 2 — SD Internal Deliberation Evidence Gap<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2--sd-internal-deliberation-evidence-gap"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: The H3 (SD Ultimatum) hypothesis in devils-advocate.md is structurally sound but lacks primary evidence (speech text, formal declaration, or interview). The Riksdag anföranden search (<code>search_anforanden</code>) for SD spokesperson statements was not executed.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: H3 was explicitly marked as unprovable and given 5/10 certainty score. The hypothesis is preserved as a RED TEAM contribution rather than a key finding.</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Run <code>search_anforanden({parti: "SD", rm: "2025/26", text: "drivmedel OR bränsleskatt"})</code> before concluding devils-advocate analysis.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Media Framing Systematic Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring">Improvement 3 — Media Framing Systematic Monitoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3--media-framing-systematic-monitoring"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: media-framing-analysis.md relies on qualitative assessment. No systematic corpus of media headlines was gathered using the news archive tools or web fetch.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: All media claims in media-framing-analysis.md are hedged with "qualitative assessment only — no systematic media corpus" qualifier.</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Implement a 10-headline sample per major document using web_fetch from Riksdagen press page before writing media-framing section.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth">Improvement 4 — Family D Electoral Analysis Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth">Improvement 4 — Family D Electoral Analysis Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4--family-d-electoral-analysis-depth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: Family D files (election-2026-analysis, coalition-mathematics, voter-segmentation) could not access current polling data. All seat projections are based on last known SCB/Sifo polling.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: All seat projections explicitly marked with "(2026-Q1 estimate; no new polling data in this run)".</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: SCB Statsborgen or direct fetch of Novus/Sifo tracking poll pages via web_fetch at start of each month-ahead run.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth">Improvement 5 — Tier-C Cross-Reference Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth">Improvement 5 — Tier-C Cross-Reference Depth<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-5--tier-c-cross-reference-depth"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Gap identified</strong>: cross-reference-map.md cites sibling monthly-review folder but does not perform deep content-level comparison. The two analyses were produced independently.</p>
 <p><strong>Action taken in Pass 2</strong>: Added explicit note in cross-reference-map.md that full synthesis required reading both analyses jointly.</p>
 <p><strong>Future improvement</strong>: Month-ahead workflows should read the executive-brief.md from the same-day monthly-review folder before starting analysis, to identify and integrate overlapping assessment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-attested">SAT Techniques Attested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-attested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sat-techniques-attested">SAT Techniques Attested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sat-techniques-attested"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2875,8 +2875,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-sat-techniques-attested">SAT Techniques Attested<a class="" aria-hidd
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Technique</th><th>Applied In</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)</td><td>devils-advocate.md</td></tr><tr><td>Scenario Planning (4-scenario cone)</td><td>scenario-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>SWOT Analysis</td><td>swot-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholder Mapping</td><td>stakeholder-perspectives.md</td></tr><tr><td>Risk Register (L×I matrix)</td><td>risk-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>Threat Analysis (STRIDE-style)</td><td>threat-analysis.md</td></tr><tr><td>Significance Scoring (DIW ranking)</td><td>significance-scoring.md</td></tr><tr><td>Key Judgments with confidence labels</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>Key Assumptions Check</td><td>intelligence-assessment.md</td></tr><tr><td>Comparative International Analysis</td><td>comparative-international.md</td></tr><tr><td>Red Team Analysis</td><td>devils-advocate.md (H3)</td></tr><tr><td>Historical Parallels</td><td>historical-parallels.md</td></tr><tr><td>Forward Indicators / Indicators Matrix</td><td>forward-indicators.md</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Total named SAT techniques: <strong>13</strong> (meets ≥10 requirement)</p>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-workflow-metadata"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Workflow</strong>: news-month-ahead</li>
 <li><strong>Run ID</strong>: 24933129778</li>
@@ -2886,11 +2886,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-workflow-metadata">Workflow Metadata<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 <li><strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26</li>
 <li><strong>MCP Server</strong>: riksdag-regering (live, HTTP)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-mcp-health">MCP Health<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mcp-health">MCP Health<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mcp-health"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>get_sync_status</code> → <code>{"status":"live"}</code> on first attempt. No retries needed.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-downloaded">Documents Downloaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-downloaded"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-documents-downloaded">Documents Downloaded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-downloaded"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -3086,21 +3086,56 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-downloaded">Documents Downloaded<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Title</th><th>Type</th><th>Organ</th><th>Date</th><th>Full-text</th><th>Admiralty</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD03100</td><td>2026 års ekonomiska vårproposition</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>available</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>HD0399</td><td>Vårändringsbudget för 2026</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>available</td><td>B2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03236</td><td>Extra ändringsbudget – Sänkt skatt drivmedel/el-gasprisstöd</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-13</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03256</td><td>Kraftfullare åtgärder mot manipulation av färdskrivare</td><td>prop</td><td>Landsbygds/Infra</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03252</td><td>Begränsning socialförsäkringsförmåner vid fängelse</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03253</td><td>EU:s bankpaket</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03244</td><td>Interoperabilitet datadelning offentlig förvaltning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03242</td><td>Tydligt regelverk aktivt skogsbruk</td><td>prop</td><td>Landsbygds/Infra</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03246</td><td>Skärpta regler unga lagöverträdare</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03231</td><td>Sveriges anslutning till Ukraina-tribunalen</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03232</td><td>Sverige till Ukrainaskadeståndskommissionen</td><td>prop</td><td>Utrikesdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-16</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03237</td><td>En betald polisutbildning</td><td>prop</td><td>Justitiedepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03243</td><td>Förbättrade regler tonnagebeskattning</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240</td><td>Nya lagar om elsystemet</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat/Näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03234</td><td>Ny lag kommunal hamnverksamhet</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03233</td><td>Nya regler mot bedrägerier elektroniska kommunikationer</td><td>prop</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03238</td><td>Ny myndighet för miljöprövning</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat/Näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03245</td><td>Nationell strategi mot mäns våld mot kvinnor</td><td>skr</td><td>Arbetsmarknadsdep</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A2</td></tr><tr><td>HD03239</td><td>Vindkraft i kommuner</td><td>prop</td><td>Klimat/Näringsliv</td><td>2026-04-14</td><td>available</td><td>A1</td></tr><tr><td>HD03104</td><td>Utvärdering statens upplåning 2021-2025</td><td>skr</td><td>Finansdepartementet</td><td>2026-04-23</td><td>available</td><td>B2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Sibling Analysis Folders Read (Tier-C Cross-type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis">Sibling Analysis Folders Read (Tier-C Cross-type Synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-analysis-folders-read-tier-c-cross-type-synthesis"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/</code> — Today's monthly review (all 23 artifacts present)</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-source-enrichment">Cross-Source Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-source-enrichment">Cross-Source Enrichment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-source-enrichment"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Statskontoret</strong>: No specific agency-capacity source found for direct May 2026 implementation issues. The new environmental review authority (HD03238) will warrant Statskontoret follow-up once established.</li>
 <li><strong>SCB</strong>: Riksbank monetary policy evaluation data available from 2024 (KPIF 1.9% average 2024, GDP +1.0% 2024)</li>
 <li><strong>IMF</strong>: WEO Apr-2026 projections consulted for Swedish macroeconomic context</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-notes">Notes<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notes"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Calendar API returned HTML (known API issue). Calendar data obtained through document analysis.</li>
 <li>Total documents: 20 propositions/skrivelser</li>
 <li>Full-text available but not fetched given time constraints; summary/snippet level sufficient</li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03100-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03100-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03231-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03231-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03236-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03236-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03237-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03237-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03238-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03238-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03239-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03239-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03240-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03240-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/HD03246-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD03246-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md"><code>documents/cluster-remaining-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/month-ahead/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3155,7 +3190,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T14:46:44.382Z">2026-04-25 14:46 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:34.862Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html b/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html
index 27480433a4..4f57e2f618 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T13:40:42.672Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:35.027Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T13:40:42.672Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:35.027Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-25T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson","description":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) completing its pre-election regulatory portfolio. The April 24 committee batch — HD01JuU10 (new firearms law),…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T13:40:42.672Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu24.json","name":"documents/hd01cu24.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu10.json","name":"documents/hd01juu10.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu31.json","name":"documents/hd01juu31.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01sou25.json","name":"documents/hd01sou25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10448-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd10448.json","name":"documents/hd10448.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11747-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11747.json","name":"documents/hd11747.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11748-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11748.json","name":"documents/hd11748.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11749-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11749.json","name":"documents/hd11749.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson","description":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) completing its pre-election regulatory portfolio. The April 24 committee batch — HD01JuU10 (new firearms law),…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:35.027Z","inLanguage":"en","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-en.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu24.json","name":"documents/hd01cu24.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu10.json","name":"documents/hd01juu10.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu31.json","name":"documents/hd01juu31.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01sou25.json","name":"documents/hd01sou25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10448-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd10448.json","name":"documents/hd10448.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11747-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11747.json","name":"documents/hd11747.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11748-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11748.json","name":"documents/hd11748.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11749-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11749.json","name":"documents/hd11749.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,22 +216,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] | <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~141 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf">BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) <strong>completing its pre-election regulatory portfolio</strong>. The April 24 committee batch — <strong>HD01JuU10 (new firearms law), HD01JuU31 (police-reform follow-up), HD01SoU25 (elderly-care reinforcement), HD01CU24 (construction-process efficiency)</strong> — clamps the regulatory closure on top of the April 22 fiscal climax (HD01FiU48 fuel-tax relief, M+SD+S+KD supermajority) [riksdagen.se]. Healthcare and crime remain the dominant <em>electoral</em> wedges; opposition interpellation traffic (HD10448 wind-power disinformation, HD11747 work-environment subsidies, HD11749 rights-of-detained children, HD11748 consular-protection in Burundi) shows S/V/MP running a <strong>disciplined three-track narrative</strong> while <strong>SD has filed zero counter-motions</strong> against the four April-24 committee reports — a structural-confidence signal that has now persisted for 18 consecutive sitting days.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment">Decision 1: Pre-election delivery confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment">Decision 1: Pre-election delivery confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidö coalition has now passed its <strong>complete declared 2025/26 legislative portfolio</strong> in the four core domains — fiscal (HD03100/HD0399), energy (HD03240/HD03238/HD03239), security/defence (UFöU3/HD03214/HD03228), and criminal-justice/welfare (HD01JuU10/HD01JuU31/HD01SoU25) — within 141 days of the September 2026 election. Implementation, not legislation, is now the binding risk. <strong>Recommendation</strong>: pivot monitoring to <em>implementation feasibility</em> (Polismyndigheten capacity post-RiR 2026:6, Miljöprövningsmyndigheten permit throughput, Försäkringskassan elderly-care administrative load).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability">Decision 2: Healthcare-and-crime wedge probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability">Decision 2: Healthcare-and-crime wedge probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability"></a></h4>
 <p>The opposition has <em>not</em> succeeded in fracturing the coalition on its primary attack surfaces: SfU18's 39 reservations did not flip a single vote; SD-KD healthcare split on SoU17 R15 was contained. The HD01JuU10 firearms law and HD01JuU31 police-reform audit both pass with M+SD+KD+L unity. <strong>Recommendation</strong>: investors and stakeholders should treat the welfare/security legislation as <em>durable through September 2026</em>; opposition wedge messaging will dominate but legislative reversal probability is LOW (≤ 25%).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture">Decision 3: Pre-campaign opposition narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture">Decision 3: Pre-campaign opposition narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture"></a></h4>
 <p>Three opposition wedges crystallised in April: (a) economic — drivmedel/SME-sjuklön (S, HD024082, HD10447); (b) environmental-disinformation — HD10448; (c) rights-of-the-detained / migrant minors / consular protection (V/MP, HD11749, HD11748). <strong>Recommendation</strong>: communicators preparing for the late-summer campaign should expect the disinformation frame (HD10448) to expand into a coalition stress-test for SD specifically; the rights-of-detained frame (HD11749) is V's primary post-prison-expansion attack vector.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 24 committee batch closes regulatory portfolio</strong> — HD01JuU10 + HD01JuU31 + HD01SoU25 + HD01CU24 — pre-election delivery on schedule</li>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 22 supermajority</strong> (HD01FiU48, M+SD+S+KD): S could not oppose 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax relief 141 days before election</li>
@@ -243,10 +243,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>🟢 <strong>Bostadsproduktion</strong> — HD01CU24 kortar handläggningstider; effekt på påbörjade bostäder mätbar Q3 2026 (data.scb.se: BO0101)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Monitor</strong>: First post-April-24 SOM Institute or Demoskop opinion poll. If S regains > 28% headline support despite the April 22 fuel-tax-relief vote, S's "symbolic opposition + practical support" message has held under stress and the September election remains a structural toss-up. If S lags below 26%, the M+KD+L bloc's pre-election positioning has demonstrably converted. <strong>Trigger date</strong>: 2026-05-08 ± 5 days (next Demoskop monthly).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -287,17 +287,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
   classDef e fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
   style A stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) · <strong>Mode</strong>: Tier-C monthly aggregation
 <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25 (30 days) · <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Admiralty range</strong>: A1–C3 · <strong>WEP language</strong>: "highly likely" / "likely" / "possible" / "unlikely" per Kent Scale
 <strong>Documents analysed</strong>: 8 primary (April 24 closure batch) + 13 sibling synthesis references in window
 <strong>Days to Election 2026</strong>: 141 (target 2026-09-13)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The 30-day window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25 closes Sweden's <strong>most consequential pre-election parliamentary month</strong> of riksmöte 2025/26. The Kristersson government has now legislated the entirety of its declared 2025/26 portfolio across four domains: <strong>fiscal pivot</strong> (HD03100 spring proposition + HD0399 spring-amending budget + HD01FiU48 emergency fuel-tax relief, the latter passing 2026-04-22 with an extraordinary M+SD+<strong>S</strong>+KD supermajority), <strong>energy transformation triptych</strong> (HD03240 / HD03238 / HD03239), <strong>security and defence cluster</strong> (UFöU3 NATO eFP Finland deployment + HD03214 cybersecurity centre + HD03228 war-materiel reform), and the <strong>April 24 closure batch</strong> of four committee reports — HD01JuU10 (ny vapenlag), HD01JuU31 (Polisreformen 2015 RiR-uppföljning), HD01SoU25 (äldreomsorg + anhörigstöd), HD01CU24 (effektiv och säker byggprocess). The opposition's parliamentary firepower in the closing week (HD10448 wind-power desinformation; HD11747 lönestöd vs arbetsmiljö; HD11748 Sahabo/Burundi; HD11749 children's right to schooling in custody) signals a clean S–V–MP division of labour entering the 18-week pre-campaign. SD continues to file <strong>zero counter-motions</strong> against open government bills — an 18-day structural-confidence streak.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10, this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10, this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -404,8 +404,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>DIW</th><th>Theme</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Bet</td><td>4.10</td><td>Drivmedelsskatte­lättnad — fiscal-electoral supermajoritet</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-22</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.85</td><td>Vårproposition — pre-election fiscal frame</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.60</td><td>Äldreomsorg + anhörigstöd</td><td>A2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01SoU25/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.55</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>A2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01JuU10/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.50</td><td>Polisreformen 2015 — RiR 2026:6 uppföljning</td><td>A2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01JuU31/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>UFöU3</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.50</td><td>NATO eFP Finland 1 200 troops</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-23</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.40</td><td>Elmarknadsreform</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.20</td><td>Effektiv och säker byggprocess</td><td>B2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01CU24/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD10448</td><td>Ip</td><td>2.95</td><td>Desinformation om vindkraft</td><td>B2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Prop</td><td>2.90</td><td>Detainee benefit restriction</td><td>B2</td><td>sibling 04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Under ±1 DIW tier perturbation the top-3 set is robust. HD01SoU25 ↔ HD01JuU10 swap order possible if pre-campaign issue salience tilts crime-ward; HD01JuU31's <em>implementation</em> weight (Polismyndigheten capacity) gives it the largest forward-leverage among the April-24 batch.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads">Thematic convergence — five threads<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads">Thematic convergence — five threads<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fiscal-electoral pivot</strong> (HD03100, HD0399, HD01FiU48). The 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax-relief vote (M+SD+S+KD) on 2026-04-22 is the political signature of the month: S's inability to oppose direct household relief 141 days before the election is the single largest <em>measured</em> opposition constraint of the riksmöte.</li>
 <li><strong>Energy transformation</strong> (HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239). The triptych passes by April 13–22; the April-24 wind-power disinformation interpellation (HD10448) is <em>post hoc</em> opposition counter-framing, not legislative obstruction.</li>
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads">Thematic convergence — five thr
 <li><strong>Criminal-justice / welfare closure</strong> — <em>the April-24 batch</em>. HD01JuU10 (vapenlag) + HD01JuU31 (RiR-uppföljning) modernise crime regulation; HD01SoU25 strengthens elderly-care delivery; HD01CU24 reduces handling time in construction permitting. Together they fill the pre-election regulatory ledger.</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition wedge architecture</strong> — S/V/MP three-track. Economic (HD024082, HD10447), environmental-information (HD10448), rights-of-detained / consular (HD11748, HD11749). C remains procedural-only.</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis">Cross-type signals (Tier-C synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis">Cross-type signals (Tier-C synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Prop → Motion → Bet → Ip pipeline</strong> is fully visible across the window: HD03100/0399 (fiscal prop) → HD024082 (S counter-motion) → HD01FiU48 (committee → vote) → HD10447 (S interpellation on SME sjuklön).</li>
 <li><strong>Implementation pivot</strong> is the dominant new trend: HD01JuU31 (RiR Polisreformen) recasts criminal-justice debate from <em>legislation</em> to <em>capacity</em>; HD11747 (lönestöd vs farlig arbetsmiljö) raises the same theme on labour side.</li>
@@ -439,52 +439,52 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis">Cross-type signals (Tier-C synth
   classDef b fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffffff
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style F3 stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-statement">Confidence statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-statement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-statement">Confidence statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-statement"></a></h3>
 <p>Overall analytic confidence is <strong>HIGH (A1)</strong> for the structural picture (delivery complete, opposition wedge taxonomy stable, SD discipline visible). Confidence is <strong>MEDIUM (B2)</strong> for forward-poll dynamics (single-source dependence on Demoskop / SOM-lag) and for the precise <em>implementation</em> trajectory of HD01JuU31 (RiR 2026:6 contains 9 open recommendations, none yet closed).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-open-pirs-carried-forward">Open PIRs carried forward<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-open-pirs-carried-forward">Open PIRs carried forward<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: Will the M+KD+L bloc convert HD01FiU48 to durable polling lift by 2026-06-01? (carried from 2026-04-23 monthly review)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: Does HD01JuU31's audit produce a Polismyndigheten reorganisation announcement before 2026-08-31?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-3</strong>: Will SD's zero-counter-motion discipline survive the September manifesto launch window?</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Issuing officer</strong>: Pether Sörling, Analyst-of-record
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Sourcing</strong>: A1–C3 Admiralty range
 <strong>Standards</strong>: ICD 203 (Analytic Standards) compliance asserted</p>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Tidö coalition (M-SD-KD-L) has, within the 30-day window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25, <strong>committed and structurally locked-in</strong> its declared 2025/26 legislative portfolio across all four core domains (fiscal, energy, security/defence, criminal-justice/welfare). The April-24 closure batch (HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24) completes the regulatory ledger. The strategic decision-relevant pivot is from <em>legislation</em> to <em>implementation</em>, with Polismyndigheten capacity (RiR 2026:6) the most binding constraint and healthcare-financing the most exposed wedge.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion">Key Judgment KJ-1 — Legislative completion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion">Key Judgment KJ-1 — Legislative completion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>We assess with HIGH confidence</strong> that the Tidö coalition has committed its declared 2025/26 portfolio in all four domains. The April-24 batch is structurally locked-in even where formal chamber votes are scheduled May, given the 2025/26 confidence-coalition >97% committee-to-chamber conversion rate.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD01CU24 (this window) + HD01FiU48, HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3 (carried) [riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong> (multi-source, internally consistent, robust to red-team H1)</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: A2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high">Key Judgment KJ-2 — Wedge effectiveness LOW; implementation risk HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high">Key Judgment KJ-2 — Wedge effectiveness LOW; implementation risk HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>We assess with HIGH confidence</strong> that opposition wedge architecture (S/V/MP three-track) will not produce <em>legislative reversals</em> in the 141-day pre-election window. <strong>We assess with MEDIUM confidence</strong> that implementation friction (R-2 police capacity, R-1 healthcare financing, R-6 construction throughput) will produce <em>politically displaced</em> outcomes that opposition can exploit narratively.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01FiU48 vote pattern (S could not oppose); SD discipline streak; RiR 2026:6 9 open recommendations [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong> for legislative claim; <strong>MEDIUM</strong> for implementation pathway (single-source on Polismyndigheten timeline)</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15">Key Judgment KJ-3 — Pre-campaign architecture stable through July; uncertain June 15+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15">Key Judgment KJ-3 — Pre-campaign architecture stable through July; uncertain June 15+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>We assess with MEDIUM confidence</strong> that SD's structural discipline (18-day zero-counter-motion streak) is durable through May–early June, but uncertain after the formal pre-campaign window opens (~June 15). Past cycles (2018, 2022) show SD pivot in final 12 weeks.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: 18-day streak (siblings); 2018+2022 base rate; H2 red-team</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (calibrated downward by H2)</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-open-pirs-this-cycle">Open PIRs (this cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-this-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-open-pirs-this-cycle">Open PIRs (this cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-this-cycle"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-A</strong>: Will M+KD+L bloc reach Demoskop ≥ 44% by 2026-07-01? (decision-relevant: Scenario A vs B)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-B</strong>: Does HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 produce a Polismyndigheten reorganisation announcement by 2026-08-31?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-C</strong>: Does SD discipline survive to manifesto launch (~2026-08-15)?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-D</strong>: Does the wind-power disinfo frame (HD10448) escalate to a SOM-Institut salience peak by 2026-06-30?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review">Prior-cycle PIRs — carried forward from 2026-04-23 monthly review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review">Prior-cycle PIRs — carried forward from 2026-04-23 monthly review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR carried</strong>: ✅ "Will HD01FiU48 receive a chamber vote before April 25?" — <em>Closed:</em> YES, 2026-04-22 supermajoritet documented</li>
 <li><strong>PIR carried (open)</strong>: 🟡 "Will the M-KD-L bloc convert HD01FiU48 into durable polling lift by 2026-06-01?" — <em>Still open</em> (renamed PIR-A above)</li>
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review">Pri
 <li><strong>Prior PIR closed</strong>: ✅ "Will SD file counter-motions on April-22 fiscal package?" — <em>Closed:</em> NO</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The prior-cycle PIR ledger is maintained in <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md</code> for full audit lineage.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KJ</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Drivers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1</td><td>HIGH</td><td>A2</td><td>Multi-source, robust</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2</td><td>HIGH (legislative) / MEDIUM (impl)</td><td>B2</td><td>Implementation pathway single-source</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>B3</td><td>Historical base rate uncertainty</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-self-attestation">ICD 203 self-attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-self-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-self-attestation">ICD 203 self-attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-self-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>This product:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>(a) Is <strong>independent of political consideration</strong> — analyst attests no advisory role with any party.</li>
@@ -533,12 +533,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-self-attestation">ICD 203 self-attestation<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>(d) Has been <strong>stress-tested</strong> via devils-advocate.md (4 hypotheses).</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) | <strong>Mode</strong>: DIW (Decision-Impact Weighting)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>DIW = 0.30·Decisional Salience + 0.25·Reach + 0.20·Reversibility + 0.15·Time-to-Effect + 0.10·Evidence Strength.
 Tier-C monthly multiplier 1.5× applied to base scores; ceiling 4.50.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window">Top-10 ranked items (this 30-day window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window">Top-10 ranked items (this 30-day window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window">Top-10 ranked items (this 30-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>DIW</th><th>DS</th><th>R</th><th>Rev</th><th>TTE</th><th>ES</th><th>Theme</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>4.10</td><td>4.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>Drivmedelsskatte­lättnad supermajoritet</td><td>sibling 04-23 <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a></td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03100</td><td>3.85</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>3.60</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>Stärkta insatser för äldre</td><td>primary HD01SoU25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>3.55</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>primary HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>3.50</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>Polisreformen 2015 RiR-uppföljning</td><td>primary HD01JuU31</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>UFöU3</td><td>3.50</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>2.5</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>NATO eFP Finland 1 200 troops</td><td>sibling 04-23 [riksdagen.se UFöU3]</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03240</td><td>3.40</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>Elmarknadsreform</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01CU24</td><td>3.20</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>Effektiv och säker byggprocess</td><td>primary HD01CU24</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD10448</td><td>2.95</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>Desinformation om vindkraft (Ip)</td><td>primary HD10448</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD11749</td><td>2.55</td><td>3.0</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>Utbildning för barn i kriminalvård</td><td>primary HD11749</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-rationale">Scoring rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-rationale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-rationale">Scoring rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-rationale"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01FiU48</strong> retains top rank from prior window: M+SD+S+KD supermajority is the single hardest-to-reverse pre-election fiscal commitment of riksmöte 2025/26.</li>
 <li><strong>HD01SoU25</strong> scores 3.60 because elderly-care + carer support is both an electoral salience peak (SOM 2025: omsorg #1 issue) and structurally sticky (kommunalt åtagande, full-cycle implementation > 18 months) [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25].</li>
@@ -710,11 +710,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-rationale">Scoring rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffffff
   classDef d fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
   style H stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>Removing HD01JuU31 (lowest-confidence in committee tier) leaves top-3 unchanged. Adding +0.5 DIW to all April-24 batch items (counterfactual: opposition-led media salience) does not change top-3 rank.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-inventory-this-window">Frame inventory (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-inventory-this-window"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-frame-inventory-this-window">Frame inventory (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-inventory-this-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-inventory-this-window">Frame inventory (this window)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Owner</th><th>Hot dok_ids</th><th>Audience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Leverans" / delivery</td><td>Tidö</td><td>HD01JuU10, HD01SoU25, HD01CU24</td><td>Storstad-pendlare, pensionärer</td></tr><tr><td>"Praktisk politik"</td><td>S</td><td>HD01FiU48 (S voted YES)</td><td>Förvärvsarbetande</td></tr><tr><td>"Trygghet" / public safety</td><td>M+SD</td><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Pensionärer, glesbygd</td></tr><tr><td>"Polisens kapacitet"</td><td>S+V</td><td>HD01JuU31 RiR</td><td>Förvärvsarbetande, yngre</td></tr><tr><td>"Anhörigfrågan"</td><td>KD primary</td><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Pensionärer, kvinnor 50+</td></tr><tr><td>"Bostäder"</td><td>M+L</td><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Storstad-pendlare, yngre</td></tr><tr><td>"Desinformation som hot"</td><td>MP+S</td><td>HD10448</td><td>Yngre, akademiker</td></tr><tr><td>"Rättigheter / mänskliga rättigheter"</td><td>V+MP</td><td>HD11748, HD11749</td><td>Yngre, akademiker</td></tr><tr><td>"Arbetsmiljö och stöd"</td><td>S</td><td>HD11747</td><td>LO-väljare</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-contest-matrix">Frame contest matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-contest-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-contest-matrix">Frame contest matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-contest-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title Frame contest x salience x ownership
   x-axis Low Salience --> High Salience
@@ -795,19 +795,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-contest-matrix">Frame contest matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
   Desinformation: [0.4, 0.25]
   Rättigheter: [0.35, 0.15]
   Arbetsmiljö: [0.45, 0.2]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon">Pre-campaign salience forecast (2026-09-13 horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon">Pre-campaign salience forecast (2026-09-13 horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Trygghet</strong> likely peaks August (HD01JuU10 ikraftträdande Q3) → high benefit to M+SD.</li>
 <li><strong>Anhörig + äldreomsorg</strong> likely peaks early summer (HD01SoU25 implementation) → KD core.</li>
 <li><strong>Polisens kapacitet</strong> is the <em>opposition's</em> peak frame; depends on RiR-uppföljning and any incidents.</li>
 <li><strong>Desinformation</strong> uncertain; H3 (devils-advocate) implies the frame is double-edged for SD. [riksdagen.se HD10448]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-notable-absences">Notable absences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notable-absences"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-notable-absences">Notable absences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notable-absences"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>C is largely <em>off</em> the framing map this window — neither owner nor amplifier of major frames.</li>
 <li>L's media framing is tied to M; insufficient stand-alone identity in window.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-ownership-network">Frame ownership network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-ownership-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-ownership-network">Frame ownership network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-ownership-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   T[Tidö-aligned riksdagen.se]:::g --> F1[Leverans HD01JuU10 HD01CU24]:::g
   T --> F2[Trygghet HD01JuU10]:::g
@@ -820,10 +820,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-ownership-network">Frame ownership network<a class="" aria-hidd
   style T stroke-width:3px
   style O stroke-width:3px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Lens</strong>: 6-stakeholder map — government parties, opposition parties, agencies, kommuner, media, väljargrupper</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
   classDef r fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   classDef m fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#e0e0e0,color:#e0e0e0
   style G stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics">Cross-stakeholder dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics">Cross-stakeholder dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government–SD</strong>: closure-batch unanimity confirms confidence relationship through pre-campaign.</li>
 <li><strong>S–government</strong>: HD01FiU48 reveals tactical complexity — S supports popular pieces while attacking adjacent themes.</li>
@@ -980,10 +980,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics">Cross-stakeholder dynamics<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>Kommuner + Försäkringskassan</strong>: HD01SoU25 + HD01CU24 both rely on kommunal kapacitet — overlap creates implementation risk.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-26 → 2026-09-13 (election day)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10">Dated indicator ledger (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10">Dated indicator ledger (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10">Dated indicator ledger (≥10)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Decision relevance</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-05-01</td><td>HD01FiU48 fuel-tax-relief implementerat</td><td>Visible household effect</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-08</td><td>First post-window Demoskop</td><td>PIR-A; Scenario A vs B</td><td>sibling synthesis</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-15</td><td>HD01CU24 chamber vote</td><td>Implementation start</td><td>HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-20</td><td>HD01JuU10 chamber vote</td><td>Crime narrative anchor</td><td>HD01JuU10 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-22</td><td>HD01SoU25 chamber vote</td><td>Anhörigstrategi launch</td><td>HD01SoU25 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-28</td><td>HD01JuU31 chamber acceptance</td><td>RiR follow-up codified</td><td>HD01JuU31 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-01</td><td>Vårriksdagens slut</td><td>Last bloc-vote opportunity</td><td>calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Pre-campaign window opens</td><td>T-1 (KJ-3)</td><td>calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-30</td><td>HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi nationell direktör utsedd</td><td>R-1 mitigation</td><td>HD01SoU25</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-30</td><td>Polismyndigheten Q1 RiR-uppföljning­statusrapport</td><td>R-2 binding</td><td>HD01JuU31</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-15</td><td>SCB BO0101 påbörjade bostäder Q2 release</td><td>HD01CU24 effect</td><td>HD01CU24</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-20</td><td>Brå brottsstatistik Q2 release</td><td>HD01JuU10 narrative</td><td>HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-30</td><td>Demoskop juli-mätning</td><td>PIR-A confirmation/refutation</td><td>(poll)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-15</td><td>Pre-campaign manifesto launches expected</td><td>KJ-3 SD-discipline test</td><td>calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-31</td><td>Polismyndigheten reorg-meddelande window close</td><td>PIR-B</td><td>HD01JuU31</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Election day</td><td>terminal</td><td>calendar</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-dependencies">Indicator dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-dependencies">Indicator dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   D1[2026-05-08 Demoskop]:::a --> D2[2026-05-15..28 Chamber votes]:::b
   D2 --> D3[2026-06-01 Vårriksdagens slut]:::b
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-dependencies">Indicator dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden
   classDef d fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   classDef e fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style D8 stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage">Indicator ranks by decision-leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage">Indicator ranks by decision-leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1141,12 +1141,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage">Indicator ranks by decision-lev
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Why it matters most</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>2026-05-08 Demoskop</td><td>First test of HD01FiU48 conversion</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2026-08-31 Polismyndigheten reorg</td><td>PIR-B closure</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2026-07-15 SCB BO0101</td><td>Empirical HD01CU24 effect</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2026-08-15 Manifesto launches</td><td>KJ-3 SD-discipline endpoint</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>[riksdagen.se HD01FiU48] [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Three-scenario cone + sensitivity ladder; 141-day horizon to 2026-09-13</p>
-<h2 id="rm-baseline-anchor">Baseline anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-anchor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-baseline-anchor">Baseline anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-anchor"></a></h3>
 <p>Tidö delivers complete legislative portfolio (HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, April-24 batch) with HD01FiU48 supermajority capping the fiscal pivot. Implementation pivot (HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD01CU24) is now the binding constraint. Opposition has tactical capture but no legislative reversals.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045">Scenario A — <em>Delivery-Lock</em> (probability 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045">Scenario A — <em>Delivery-Lock</em> (probability 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Tidö converts the legislative completeness into measurable polling lift; Demoskop shows M+KD+L bloc reaching 47% by mid-July; SD holds 18%; S stuck at 25–27%.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045">Scenario A — <em>Deliver
 <li><strong>Evidence base</strong>: HD01FiU48, HD01JuU10, HD01SoU25 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely">Scenario B — <em>Wedge Stalemate</em> (probability 0.35) — most-likely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely">Scenario B — <em>Wedge Stalemate</em> (probability 0.35) — most-likely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>M+KD+L bloc holds 41–43% but does not break above; S resilient at 28–30%; SD 17–19%; September election reverts to coalition-arithmetic uncertainty.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely">Scenario B
 <li><strong>Evidence base</strong>: HD01SoU25 + HD01SoU17 sibling, HD11749 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015">Scenario C — <em>Implementation Cascade</em> (probability 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015">Scenario C — <em>Implementation Cascade</em> (probability 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>RiR 2026:6 follow-up reveals deeper Polismyndigheten dysfunction; Brå Q2 brottsstatistik shows uptick; HD01JuU10's launch is overshadowed by capacity story; SD frustration with Polismyndigheten ledning becomes overt.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015">Scenario C — <e
 <li><strong>Evidence base</strong>: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6, sibling 2026-04-24 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: C3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005">Scenario D — <em>Tail risk: Geopolitical shock</em> (probability 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005">Scenario D — <em>Tail risk: Geopolitical shock</em> (probability 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Russia/NATO incident or Burundi-style consular escalation reframes campaign mid-cycle; HD11748-class cases multiply.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005">Scenario D
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: C4</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-summary">Scenario summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-summary">Scenario summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title Scenario probability × impact
   x-axis Low Probability --> High Probability
@@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-summary">Scenario summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
   B Wedge Stalemate: [0.35, 0.5]
   C Implementation Cascade: [0.15, 0.85]
   D Tail Geopolitical: [0.05, 0.9]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-implications">Decision implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-implications">Decision implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1229,9 +1229,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-implications">Decision implications<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Audience</th><th>Plan around</th><th>Hedge against</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Communicators</td><td>Scenario B (most-likely)</td><td>Scenario C</td></tr><tr><td>Investors</td><td>Scenario A (delivery-lock)</td><td>Scenario C</td></tr><tr><td>Policy planners</td><td>Scenario A → implementation focus</td><td>Scenario C</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) | <strong>Horizon</strong>: April–September 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-dimension risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-dimension risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-dimension risk register<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>Inherent</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Residual</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-1</td><td>Political</td><td>Healthcare wedge fractures coalition on HD01SoU25 financing</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Treasury-side amendment in autumn budget</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01SoU25 + sibling SoU17 [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>R-2</td><td>Operational</td><td>Polismyndigheten kapacitetsbrist försenar HD01JuU10 implementering</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Allokering i höstbudget; RiR-genomförandeplan</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>R-3</td><td>Reputational</td><td>Wind-disinfo frame slår tillbaka mot regeringsblock</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Energiministerns proaktiva svar</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</td></tr><tr><td>R-4</td><td>Legal</td><td>Konsulärt skydd otillräckligt — Sahabo-fallet</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>UD-resursförstärkning</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</td></tr><tr><td>R-5</td><td>Electoral</td><td>M+KD+L bloc misslyckas omsätta leverans till stöd före 2026-09-13</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Pre-campaign valbudget Q3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01FiU48 + sibling 04-23 monthly review</td></tr><tr><td>R-6</td><td>Implementation</td><td>Construction-permit reform ger inte mätbar effekt på påbörjade bostäder före val</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>SCB BO0101 monitoring + tertialuppföljning</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr><tr><td>R-7</td><td>Information</td><td>Lönestöd-arbetsmiljö samordningsbrist eskalerar</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Tillväxtverket-Arbetsmiljöverket MoU</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD11747 [riksdagen.se HD11747]</td></tr><tr><td>R-8</td><td>Rights</td><td>V/MP-frame om barn i kriminalvård når mediegenombrott</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Skolverket-IVO-kriminalvård gemensamt direktiv</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual">Heat map (likelihood × impact, residual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual">Heat map (likelihood × impact, residual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title Risk heat map (residual)
   x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -1363,15 +1363,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual">Heat map (likelihood × impact,
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffffff
   classDef d fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
   style A stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-top-3-risks-expanded">Top-3 risks expanded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-risks-expanded"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-risks-expanded">Top-3 risks expanded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-risks-expanded"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>R-5 (Electoral conversion)</strong>: Most consequential — even with perfect legislative delivery, polling lift is not automatic. Demoskop/SOM lag 4–6 weeks. <strong>Trigger date</strong>: Demoskop 2026-05-08 ± 5 d.</p>
 <p><strong>R-2 (Police capacity)</strong>: RiR 2026:6 names 9 open recommendations; HD01JuU10's effective enforcement depends on closing them. Capacity lag means HD01JuU10's <em>deterrent</em> signalling effect is decoupled from operational outcome.</p>
 <p><strong>R-1 (Healthcare wedge)</strong>: HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi has no dedicated funding line in HD03100 — opposition will exploit. Needs Q3 2026 amendment.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Subject</strong>: Tidö coalition position 141 days before September 2026 election</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td>SO: Convert delivered portfolio (HD01FiU48 + April-24 batch) into pre-campaign frame [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</td><td>ST: Use SD discipline (zero counter-motions) to deflect coalition-cohesion attacks [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td>WO: Address Polismyndigheten capacity gap with budget signal [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td><td>WT: Healthcare opposition (S+V+MP+C+L division-of-labour) on SoU17/SoU25 reservations [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Complete pre-election regulatory ledger across 4 domains</td><td>HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, HD01JuU10 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>4.1 GSEK fuel-tax supermajority demonstrates opposition capture</td><td>HD01FiU48 — M+SD+S+KD vote 2026-04-22 [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</td></tr><tr><td>SD structural discipline — 18-day zero-counter-motion streak</td><td>sibling synthesis 2026-04-22..24 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>New firearms framework modernises crime regulation</td><td>HD01JuU10 — JuU vote pending May [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</td></tr><tr><td>Construction-permit acceleration unlocks bostadsbyggande</td><td>HD01CU24 — civilutskottet betänkande [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RiR 2026:6 documents kvardröjande lednings- och utredningsproblem i Polismyndigheten</td><td>HD01JuU31 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Anhörigstrategi har ingen tillförd finansieringspost i HD03100</td><td>HD01SoU25 + HD03100 cross-read [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>Lönestöd-vs-arbetsmiljö samordning brister institutionellt</td><td>HD11747 [riksdagen.se HD11747]</td></tr><tr><td>Konsulärt skydd har resursbegränsningar (Sahabo-fallet)</td><td>HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-campaign regulatory closure ger M+KD+L förutsägbar leveransberättelse</td><td>HD03100 + April-24 batch [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation pivot ger Tidö andra runda av "leverans"-tema</td><td>HD01JuU31 RiR-uppföljning [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy disinformation frame kan stärka SD som "common-sense"-aktör</td><td>HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</td></tr><tr><td>Construction-permit reform alignerar med urban väljarskifte</td><td>HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S+V+MP healthcare-attack på SoU25 anhörigstöd-finansiering</td><td>HD01SoU25 [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>V+MP rättighets­frame (kriminalvård/konsulärt) når mediepunkter</td><td>HD11748 + HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749]</td></tr><tr><td>Polisreform-RiR ger oppositionen kapacitetskritik</td><td>HD01JuU31 + RiR 2026:6 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind-power disinformation-frame är dubbelriktad — kan slå tillbaka mot SD</td><td>HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-tows-overview">Visual TOWS overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-tows-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-tows-overview">Visual TOWS overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-tows-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   S[Strengths HD01FiU48 HD01JuU10]:::s --> SO[SO match HD01SoU25 anhörig]:::so
   W[Weaknesses HD01JuU31 HD01SoU25 finansiering]:::w --> WT[WT mitigation HD03100 sibling]:::wt
@@ -1520,11 +1520,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-tows-overview">Visual TOWS overview<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
   style SO stroke-width:2px
   style WT stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political Threat Taxonomy (institutional, electoral, informational, implementation)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-register">Threat register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional">T-1: Coalition cohesion erosion (institutional)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-register">Threat register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional">T-1: Coalition cohesion erosion (institutional)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: SoU17 R15 (sibling) flagged SD–KD healthcare divergence; HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi could re-trigger.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: LOW (≤25%) — SD has held discipline 18 sitting days.</li>
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional">T-1: Coalition cohesion
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01SoU25, sibling SoU17 [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation">T-2: Implementation deficit cascade (implementation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation">T-2: Implementation deficit cascade (implementation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 reveals 9 open Polismyndigheten recommendations; HD01CU24 depends on kommunal kapacitet.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: HIGH — historical base rate from prior reform cycles.</li>
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation">T-2: Implementatio
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01JuU31, HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: A2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational">T-3: Information-environment threat (informational)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational">T-3: Information-environment threat (informational)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: HD10448 explicitly raises wind-power disinformation as a <em>parliamentary</em> concern. The frame can be turned against any actor — including the originator.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: MEDIUM — ongoing anti-renewable campaigns documented in Sweden since 2023.</li>
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational">T-3: Information-en
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral">T-4: Electoral wedge effectiveness (electoral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral">T-4: Electoral wedge effectiveness (electoral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: S/V/MP three-track wedges (economic / informational / rights-of-detained) coordinate without formal coalition.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: MEDIUM — wedge architecture is mature.</li>
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral">T-4: Electoral wedge eff
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024082 sibling, HD11747, HD11748, HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external">T-5: Foreign-policy reputational threat (institutional / external)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external">T-5: Foreign-policy reputational threat (institutional / external)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: Sahabo-fallet (HD11748) — Swedish citizen detained abroad raises consular-protection capacity question.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: LOW — single case.</li>
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external">T-5:
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping">Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping">Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping">Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Confidence</th><th>NATO ATP-2.33.4 alignment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T-1</td><td>HIGH</td><td>political stability surveillance</td></tr><tr><td>T-2</td><td>HIGH</td><td>governance capacity assessment</td></tr><tr><td>T-3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>information environment monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>T-4</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>political opposition dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>T-5</td><td>LOW</td><td>consular / diaspora</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-surface-diagram">Threat surface diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-surface-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-surface-diagram">Threat surface diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-surface-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
   W[Window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25]:::a --> T1[T1 capacity gap HD01JuU31 riksdagen.se]:::r
   W --> T2[T2 finansieringsbrist HD01SoU25 anhörig]:::r
@@ -1619,185 +1619,185 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-surface-diagram">Threat surface diagram<a class="" aria-hidden
   style T2 stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu24">HD01CU24<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu24"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: CU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01CU24 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Reformpaket för förenklad byggprocess och kortare kommunala handläggningstider; instämmer i regeringens förslag med vissa följdmotioner.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>M (regeringsförslag)</li>
 <li>KD/L medverkar</li>
 <li>S följdmotion finansiering</li>
 <li>C tekniska reservationer</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>Tidö-leverans i bostadsfrågan; mätbar effekt via SCB BO0101 från Q3 2026; relevant för storstad-pendlare-segmentet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading"></a></h3>
 <p>Implementeringsrisken ligger på kommunal handläggar­kapacitet, inte på lagtexten. Effekt på påbörjade bostäder syns tidigast 2026-Q3.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01cu24.json">riksdagen.se HD01CU24</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01cu24.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01juu10">HD01JuU10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01juu10"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: JuU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01JuU10 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Ny vapenlag med skärpta tillstånds- och vapenregister­krav; IT-modernisering av vapenregistret krävs; ikraftträdande planerat Q3 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-1">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-1">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>M+SD primära avsändare</li>
 <li>KD/L stöder</li>
 <li>V/MP partiella reservationer</li>
 <li>Polismyndigheten implementeringsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Centralt narrativ för 'trygghet'-frame; Tidöns största kriminalpolitiska leverans i 2025/26-mötet; konsoliderar SD-väljare.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-1">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-1">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Implementeringen är beroende av att RiR-rekommendationerna i HD01JuU31 stängs; risk för operativ flaskhals hos Polismyndigheten.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-1">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-1">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01juu10.json">riksdagen.se HD01JuU10</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01juu10.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01juu31">HD01JuU31<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01juu31"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: JuU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01JuU31 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksrevisionens andra uppföljning av Polisreformen 2015; 9 öppna rekommendationer; utskottet kräver statusrapport Q3 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-2">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-2">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>RiR (Riksrevisionen) avsändare</li>
 <li>JuU-utskott (S+M+SD+KD+L+V+MP+C konsensus)</li>
 <li>Polismyndigheten implementeringsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Avslöjar kapacitetsglappet bakom HD01JuU10; politiskt verktyg för opposition men formellt accepterat av Tidö.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-2">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-2">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Operativ förändring osannolik före september-valet 2026; effekten är narrativ — exponerar gap mellan ambition och kapacitet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-2">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-2">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01juu31.json">riksdagen.se HD01JuU31</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01juu31.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sou25">HD01SoU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sou25"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: SoU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01SoU25 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Nationell anhörigstrategi och förstärkt äldreomsorg; KD primär avsändare; finansiering ej fullt täckt i HD03100 vårpropositionen.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-3">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-3">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>KD primär</li>
 <li>M+L stöder</li>
 <li>S följdmotion fokus på finansiering</li>
 <li>V kompletterande reservation</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Direkt-leverans till pensionärs- och kvinnor-50+-segmenten; bär KD:s identitetspolitik; finansieringsbristen är fragility (R-1).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-3">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-3">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Implementeringen kräver nationell direktör (utses 2026-06-30) och kommunal kapacitet; effekt synlig först 2026 H2.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-3">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-3">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01sou25.json">riksdagen.se HD01SoU25</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01sou25.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10448">HD10448<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10448"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10448-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Ip | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10448 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation från MP/S till energiminister om systematisk desinformation om vindkraft i kommunala beslutsprocesser; svar 2026-05-06.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-4">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-4">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>MP+S avsändare</li>
 <li>Energiminister svarsbärare</li>
 <li>kommuner Norrbotten/Västerbotten primär kontext</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Första parlamentariska eko av 2023 års vindkraftsmotståndsvåg; testar regeringens förmåga att hantera disinformation utan att alienera SD-bas.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-4">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-4">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Frame är dubbelbottnad — gynnar opposition på storstad/yngre men kan förlora för MP+S i glesbygd; H3 i devils-advocate.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-4">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-4">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd10448.json">riksdagen.se HD10448</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd10448.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd11747">HD11747<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11747"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11747-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Fr | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD11747 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Skriftlig fråga från S-ledamot om bristande arbetsmiljöuppföljning vid lönestödsanställningar; svar inom 4 dagar.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-5">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-5">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S-ledamot avsändare</li>
 <li>Arbetsmarknadsminister svarsbärare</li>
 <li>Arbetsförmiljöverket</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-5">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-5">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p>S:s primära attackkanal mot Tidö i förvärvsarbetande LO/TCO-segmentet; etablerar 'arbetsmiljö och stöd'-frame inför kampanj.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-5">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-5">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Liten omedelbar effekt men bygger berättelse-arsenal till manifest-fasen 2026-08.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-5">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-5">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11747.json">riksdagen.se HD11747</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd11747.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd11748">HD11748<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11748"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11748-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Fr | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD11748 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Skriftlig fråga från V-ledamot om svensk hantering av Burundi-tolken Sahabo; mänskliga rättigheter och utlämning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-6">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-6">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V-ledamot avsändare</li>
 <li>Migrationsminister + UD svarsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-6">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-6">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Mindre väljarbas-relevans men hög aktivist-betydelse; bygger V:s mänskliga-rättigheter-profil i yngre/akademiker-segment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-6">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-6">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Ingen omedelbar policy-effekt; ingår i V:s pre-kampanjnarrativ.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-6">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-6">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11748.json">riksdagen.se HD11748</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd11748.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd11749">HD11749<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11749"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11749-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Fr | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD11749 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Skriftlig fråga från V-ledamot om brister i undervisning för barn placerade i förvar; barnkonventionsöverväganden.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-7">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-7">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V-ledamot avsändare</li>
 <li>Migrationsminister + utbildningsminister svarsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-7">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-7">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-7"></a></h3>
 <p>V:s starkaste yngre-väljare-signal i window; rättigheter-frame; potentiell följdmotion i SoU eller UbU.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-7">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-7">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Liten omedelbar effekt men hög sammanlänkning med Yngre 18-29-segmentet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-7">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-7">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11749.json">riksdagen.se HD11749</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd11749.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (B2)
 <strong>Election date</strong>: 2026-09-13 | <strong>Days remaining</strong>: 141</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-architecture">Pre-campaign architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-architecture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-campaign-architecture">Pre-campaign architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-architecture"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government bloc</strong>: M, KD, L, SD-confidence — entered window with 173/349-seat working majority</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition</strong>: S 107 / V 24 / MP 18 / C 24 — 173 (mirror)</li>
 <li><strong>Tied chamber arithmetic</strong> is the structural feature; wedge politics dominates</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-window-end-snapshot">Window-end snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-end-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-window-end-snapshot">Window-end snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-end-snapshot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
   E[Election 2026-09-13 — riksdagen.se context]:::a
   E --> G[Government bloc M+KD+L+SD-confidence ~179 seats]:::g
@@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-window-end-snapshot">Window-end snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true
   style E stroke-width:3px
   style G stroke-width:2px
   style O stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-window-dynamics-summary">Window dynamics summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-dynamics-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-window-dynamics-summary">Window dynamics summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-dynamics-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-window-dynamics-summary">Window dynamics summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Driver</th><th>Effect on M+KD+L</th><th>Effect on S</th><th>Effect on SD</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48 supermajoritet (carried)</td><td>+ 1.5 ppt</td><td>flat (S voted YES)</td><td>+ 0.3 ppt</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU10 vapenlag</td><td>+ 0.4 ppt (M crime narrative)</td><td>– 0.2 ppt</td><td>+ 0.5 ppt (base mobilisation)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31 RiR-uppföljning</td><td>– 0.3 ppt (capacity gap exposed)</td><td>+ 0.5 ppt</td><td>flat</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25 äldreomsorg</td><td>+ 0.6 ppt (KD core voter)</td><td>+ 0.3 ppt (S funding attack)</td><td>flat</td></tr><tr><td>HD10448 desinfo Ip</td><td>– 0.2 ppt</td><td>flat</td><td>– 0.4 ppt (frame ambiguity)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net window effect</strong>: M+KD+L bloc +2.0 ppt, S +0.6 ppt, SD +0.4 ppt — <strong>inside polling noise</strong>, not yet structural shift.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-forward-dates">Key forward dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-forward-dates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-forward-dates">Key forward dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-forward-dates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1901,11 +1901,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-forward-dates">Key forward dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Decision relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-05-08</td><td>First post-window Demoskop</td><td>PIR-A</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-01</td><td>Vårriksdagens slut</td><td>last bloc-vote opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Pre-campaign window opens</td><td>T-1, KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-15</td><td>Manifesto launches expected</td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Election</td><td>terminal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01FiU48 sibling, HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD10448 [riksdagen.se]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526">Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526">Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526">Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Socialdemokraterna (S)</td><td>107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>68</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>73</td><td>Confidence</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition (procedural)</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Liberalerna (L)</td><td>16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Government bloc (M+KD+L): 103. With SD confidence: 176. <strong>Working majority: 3 seats above 175 threshold</strong> (4 with SD discipline).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried">Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (carried)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried">Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (carried)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2042,7 +2042,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried">Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (ca
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Frånvarande</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>65</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>71</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>14</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>95</td><td>0</td><td>12</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>22</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>16</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>22</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>263</strong></td><td><strong>38</strong></td><td><strong>34</strong></td><td><strong>14</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>[riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</p>
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: M+SD+S+KD = 263 Ja → unprecedented multi-bloc supermajority on fuel-tax relief.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026">Forward votes (pending May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026">Forward votes (pending May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2079,7 +2079,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026">Forward votes (pending May 2026)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Issue</th><th>Ja-projection</th><th>Nej-projection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+(C? L?) ≥ 195</td><td>V+MP partially</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>RiR Polisreformen</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+S formal acceptance</td><td>none expected</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Äldreomsorg</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+ partial S</td><td>partial V</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Byggprocess</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+C</td><td>partial V/MP</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election">Coalition arithmetic — September 2026 election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election">Coalition arithmetic — September 2026 election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   M[M+KD+L 103]:::g --> B1{Bloc 175?}
   SD[SD 73]:::sd --> B1
@@ -2100,8 +2100,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election">Coalition arithmetic 
   style B1 stroke-width:2px
   style B2 stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-segments-tracked-this-window">Segments tracked (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segments-tracked-this-window"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-segments-tracked-this-window">Segments tracked (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segments-tracked-this-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2156,14 +2156,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-segments-tracked-this-window">Segments tracked (this window)<a class=
   "Yngre 18-29" : 14
   "SME / egna företagare" : 7
   "Övriga" : 5</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-window-movement-qualitative">Window movement (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-movement-qualitative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-window-movement-qualitative">Window movement (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-movement-qualitative"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Pensionärer</strong>: HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi is <em>direct delivery</em>; finansieringsbrist (R-1) is the only fragility.</li>
 <li><strong>Glesbygd</strong>: HD01FiU48 fuel-tax is consolidating; HD10448 wind-disinfo frame is divisive within segment.</li>
 <li><strong>Förvärvsarbetande LO/TCO</strong>: HD11747 lönestöd-arbetsmiljö story is S's primary attack channel; HD01JuU10 firearms law popular.</li>
 <li><strong>Yngre</strong>: HD11749 rights-of-detained children scheme is V's strongest young-voter signal.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-segment-messaging-map">Cross-segment messaging map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-messaging-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-segment-messaging-map">Cross-segment messaging map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-messaging-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2205,7 +2205,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-segment-messaging-map">Cross-segment messaging map<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Coalition</th><th>Primary segments</th><th>Key window evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M+KD+L</td><td>Storstad-pendlare + Pensionärer + SME</td><td>HD01CU24, HD01SoU25, HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Glesbygd + Pensionärer</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Förvärvsarbetande + Pensionärer</td><td>HD11747, HD024082</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Yngre + LO</td><td>HD11749, HD11748</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Yngre + Storstad-pendlare</td><td>HD10448</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Företagare + Glesbygd</td><td>(procedural this window)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-segment-flow">Cross-segment flow<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-flow"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-segment-flow">Cross-segment flow<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-flow"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   V[Voter segments 2026 riksdagen.se context]:::a --> P1[Pensionärer KD HD01SoU25]:::p
   V --> G1[Glesbygd SD HD01FiU48]:::g
@@ -2220,11 +2220,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-segment-flow">Cross-segment flow<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
   classDef l fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style V stroke-width:3px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Cross-Nordic + EU peer comparison on the four delivered portfolios</p>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, Netherlands</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election">Comparator table — fiscal pivot to election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election">Comparator table — fiscal pivot to election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election">Comparator table — fisc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Election</th><th>Pre-election fiscal action</th><th>Coalition pattern</th><th>Outcome lesson</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden 2026</td><td>2026-09-13</td><td>HD01FiU48 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax (M+SD+S+KD)</td><td>M-SD-KD-L confidence</td><td>live observation [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark 2022</td><td>2022-11-01</td><td>Energy tilbagebetaling pre-election</td><td>SocDem majority</td><td>delivered → polling lift sustained</td></tr><tr><td>Norway 2021</td><td>2021-09-13</td><td>Strømstønad + drivstoffrabatt pre-poll</td><td>Ap-Sp majority</td><td>delivered → polling held</td></tr><tr><td>Finland 2023</td><td>2023-04-02</td><td>Energiakompensaatio late spring</td><td>Centre-right turnover</td><td>popular but not decisive</td></tr><tr><td>Germany 2025</td><td>2025-02-23</td><td>Energy price cap extension</td><td>CDU/CSU+SPD coalition</td><td>delivered → election win</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands 2023</td><td>2023-11-22</td><td>Box-3 reform deferral</td><td>Caretaker</td><td>implementation gap exposed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Across 5 Nordic + EU peers, fiscal pre-election household relief delivered 4–6 months before vote correlates with polling stability (median +1.8 ppt for incumbent block) but rarely delivers >3 ppt lift. Sweden's HD01FiU48 sits within this band — supports Scenario B (Wedge Stalemate).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up">Comparator table — police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up">Comparator table — police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2324,7 +2324,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up">Comparator table — polic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Reform</th><th>Audit follow-up</th><th>Outcome</th><th>Sweden parallel</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden 2015→2026</td><td>Polisreformen 2015</td><td>RiR 2026:6 → HD01JuU31</td><td>implementation gap</td><td>live [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark 2007</td><td>Politireformen</td><td>Rigsrevisionen 2010 + 2014</td><td>7-yr stabilisation</td><td>implementation pivot is multi-year</td></tr><tr><td>Norway 2016</td><td>Nærpolitireformen</td><td>Riksrevisjonen 2018 + 2021</td><td>partial closure</td><td>mid-decade audit cycle typical</td></tr><tr><td>Finland 2014</td><td>Police restructure</td><td>VTV 2017</td><td>quicker closure</td><td>smaller administrative footprint matters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Police reorganisation audits in the Nordic region typically cycle through two follow-up rounds before recommendations close. RiR 2026:6 + HD01JuU31 represent the <em>first</em> follow-up; expect a second around 2029.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark">Cross-Nordic coalition-discipline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark">Cross-Nordic coalition-discipline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2363,29 +2363,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark">Cross-Nordic coalition-d
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Coalition type</th><th>Pre-election counter-motion rate</th><th>Sweden 2026</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>Confidence (M-KD-L + SD external)</td><td>0/18 sitting days</td><td>ANOMALOUSLY HIGH discipline</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>SVM majority 2022</td><td>~7% counter-motion rate pre-2024 EU</td><td>typical</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>Ap-Sp 2021</td><td>~5% pre-2025</td><td>typical</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>Centre-right Orpo 2023</td><td>~9% pre-2027</td><td>typical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: SD's 18-day zero-counter-motion streak is <strong>outside the Nordic norm</strong> and reads as a deliberate pre-election signal of confidence-relationship durability.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-selected-parallels">Selected parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-selected-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot">Pre-election fiscal pivot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-selected-parallels">Selected parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-selected-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot">Pre-election fiscal pivot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2014 Reinfeldt → Löfven</strong>: Spring 2014 alliance-bloc tax restraint pre-election; opposition won despite delivery.</li>
 <li><strong>2018 Löfven I-II transition</strong>: Fiscal package autumn 2017; supermajority not achieved; tied election result.</li>
 <li><strong>2022 Andersson → Kristersson</strong>: spring 2022 elenergistöd; popular but coalition lost narrowly. [riksdagen.se HD03100 sibling]</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Fiscal pre-election delivery is necessary but rarely sufficient (mean polling lift 4-6 weeks post-vote: +1.8 ppt for incumbent bloc, n=4 cycles).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-police-reform-follow-up">Police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-police-reform-follow-up"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-police-reform-follow-up">Police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-police-reform-follow-up"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2010 Politireformen DK</strong>: Two follow-up audits; 7-yr stabilisation cycle; HD01JuU31 ≈ first follow-up. [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Polisreformen 2015 (Sweden)</strong>: Riksrevisionen 2018, 2021, now 2026:6. Recommendations close at ~30%/audit cycle.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: HD01JuU31 will not produce visible operational change before September election; political effect is <em>narrative</em>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-coalition-discipline">Confidence-coalition discipline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-coalition-discipline"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-coalition-discipline">Confidence-coalition discipline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-coalition-discipline"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2014–2018 alliance under Löfven</strong>: counter-motion rate ≈ 8%; modest discipline.</li>
 <li><strong>2018–2022 januariavtal</strong>: ~5%; high discipline because formal contract.</li>
 <li><strong>2022– Tidöavtalet</strong>: 2025/26 Q1–Q2 ≈ 1.5%; 18-day zero-streak in this window. [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Tidöavtalet's discipline is <em>outside</em> historical norms; explanations either institutional (formal contract effect) or strategic (single-cycle pre-election) — H2 in devils-advocate stresses the latter.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle">Wind-power disinformation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle">Wind-power disinformation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2023 vindkraftsmotstånd Q3</strong>: Norrbotten/Västerbotten kommunala vetoexplosion. HD10448 is the first parliamentary echo of that cycle. [riksdagen.se HD10448]</li>
 </ul>
@@ -2395,7 +2395,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle">Wind-power disinformation cycle<a cl
   2018 : Löfven transition : tied election
   2022 : Andersson elenergistöd : narrow opposition win
   2026 : Tidö portfolio + supermajoritet : pending September</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cycle-parallels-diagram">Cycle parallels diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cycle-parallels-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cycle-parallels-diagram">Cycle parallels diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cycle-parallels-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   H[Historical pre-election cycles riksdagen.se]:::a --> H1[2014 alliance fiscal pivot]:::b
   H --> H2[2018 Löfven transition]:::b
@@ -2406,8 +2406,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-cycle-parallels-diagram">Cycle parallels diagram<a class="" aria-hidd
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#ffffff
   style H4 stroke-width:3px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-matrix">Implementation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-matrix">Implementation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2477,7 +2477,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-implementation-matrix">Implementation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Owner</th><th>Critical-path constraint</th><th>Window to visible effect</th><th>Feasibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Polismyndigheten + Domstolsverket</td><td>Tillståndshanterings­kapacitet</td><td>9–18 months</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH; depends on HD01JuU31 closure [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>Polismyndigheten</td><td>RiR 2026:6 9 öppna rekommendationer</td><td>24+ months</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM; second audit cycle expected ~2029 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Försäkringskassan + kommuner</td><td>Anhörigstrategi finansiering (HD03100 saknar post)</td><td>12–18 months</td><td>MEDIUM; R-1 binding [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Boverket + kommuner</td><td>Kommunal handläggar­kapacitet</td><td>6–12 months for permits, 18+ for påbörjade bostäder</td><td>MEDIUM; mätbart Q3 2026 [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 fiscal</td><td>Treasury</td><td>Implementeringsklart Q3 2026</td><td>live</td><td>HIGH (sibling)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 elmarknad</td><td>Energimyndigheten + Svenska Kraftnät</td><td>Teknisk omkonfigurering</td><td>12+ months</td><td>MEDIUM (sibling)</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO eFP</td><td>FM</td><td>Förbandsutbyggnad 1200 trupp</td><td>6–9 months</td><td>HIGH (sibling)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48 fuel</td><td>Treasury (live)</td><td>Implementerat 2026-05-01</td><td>live</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama">Capacity-bottleneck panorama<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama">Capacity-bottleneck panorama<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
   T[Legislation committed]:::a --> P[Polismyndigheten]:::b
   T --> F[Försäkringskassan + kommuner]:::b
@@ -2493,7 +2493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama">Capacity-bottleneck panorama<a class=""
   classDef y fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
   style P1 stroke-width:2px
   style F1 stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-implementation-triggers">Forward implementation triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-implementation-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-implementation-triggers">Forward implementation triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-implementation-triggers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01JuU10 vapenregister IT-modernisering: status report expected Q3 2026 from Polismyndigheten.</li>
 <li>HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi national director: appointment expected 2026-06-30.</li>
@@ -2502,35 +2502,35 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-implementation-triggers">Forward implementation triggers<a cl
 </ul>
 <p>[riksdagen.se HD01JuU31] [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10] [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25] [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (B2)
 <strong>Method</strong>: ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) + structured red-team</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mainline-finding-under-stress">Mainline finding under stress<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-finding-under-stress"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mainline-finding-under-stress">Mainline finding under stress<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-finding-under-stress"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>Tidö coalition has completed its 2025/26 portfolio; implementation is the binding risk; opposition has tactical capture without legislative reversals.</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is <strong>wrong</strong> and tests three competing hypotheses.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery">Hypothesis H1: The April-24 batch is <em>electoral theatre</em>, not delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery">Hypothesis H1: The April-24 batch is <em>electoral theatre</em>, not delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24 are scheduled for committee but not finalised in chamber. The "delivered portfolio" thesis is therefore premature; April-24 is closer to <em>commitments</em> than <em>outcomes</em>.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: Three of four (JuU10, SoU25, CU24) are pre-vote; final chamber vote is May. RiR 2026:6 (HD01JuU31) is <em>information</em>, not legislation [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31].</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: Confidence-coalition committee output has converted to chamber assent at >97% rate in 2025/26; HD01FiU48 vote pattern (M+SD+S+KD) shows even opposition support was extractable.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Mainline is <strong>structurally correct, terminologically loose</strong>. Replace "delivered" with "committed and structurally locked-in" in formal claims.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable">Hypothesis H2: SD discipline is <em>strategic patience</em>, not durable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable">Hypothesis H2: SD discipline is <em>strategic patience</em>, not durable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: SD's zero-counter-motion streak is calculated short-term restraint. Once campaigning begins (≈2026-06-15), SD will publicly differentiate from M on migration/healthcare to mobilise its base, ending the discipline streak.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: 2018 and 2022 cycles both showed SD pivot in final 12 weeks; HD01SoU17 R15 already demonstrated SD-KD healthcare divergence (sibling 2026-04-23).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: 2025/26 is a <em>governing</em> SD cycle; party communication discipline appears institutional, not tactical. No off-script statements observed in 30-day window.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Mainline confidence on SD discipline should drop from VERY HIGH to <strong>HIGH</strong> for the 2026-06-15 → 2026-09-13 window. Add explicit indicator (T-1).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd">Hypothesis H3: HD10448 disinformation frame is a Trojan attack on SD<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd">Hypothesis H3: HD10448 disinformation frame is a Trojan attack on SD<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: MP/V's HD10448 wind-power-disinformation interpellation is not a sincere policy concern but a frame designed to force SD into either <em>defending</em> anti-renewable rhetoric (alienating moderate voters) or <em>renouncing</em> it (alienating its base).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: Wind-power skepticism is correlated with SD voter clusters (SOM 2024 data). Forcing the frame onto the chamber floor is a reasonable opposition manoeuvre [riksdagen.se HD10448].</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: HD10448 names no party; it is procedurally a question to the energiminister. The disinfo frame can equally serve M's consolidation messaging.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Plausible but not actionable. Track post-reply media uptake for confirmation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk">Hypothesis H4: Implementation pivot is the <em>opposition's</em> opportunity, not a coalition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk">Hypothesis H4: Implementation pivot is the <em>opposition's</em> opportunity, not a coalition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 hands the opposition a Polismyndigheten capacity stick that they can use through the entire campaign without ever proposing legislation. Tidö's "delivery" claim becomes a liability if implementation falters.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: RiR 2026:6 contains 9 open recommendations; failure to close any becomes attack material; sibling intel shows S has already begun this framing on HD10447 (sjuklön).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: Voters historically attribute implementation failures to agencies, not parties; M can deflect to Polismyndigheten leadership.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Real risk. Strengthens R-2 in risk register; ought to be cross-referenced.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-red-team-summary">Structured red-team summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-red-team-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-red-team-summary">Structured red-team summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-red-team-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2562,14 +2562,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-red-team-summary">Structured red-team summary<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Plausibility</th><th>Mainline correction needed?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1 — theatre vs delivery</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Yes — terminology</td></tr><tr><td>H2 — SD strategic patience</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Yes — confidence band</td></tr><tr><td>H3 — Trojan disinfo frame</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>H4 — opposition opportunity</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Yes — risk emphasis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections">Mainline carries forward, with two corrections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections">Mainline carries forward, with two corrections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Reword "delivered" → "committed and structurally locked-in" (H1).</li>
 <li>Drop SD-discipline confidence VERY HIGH → HIGH for June–September (H2).</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-dimension classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-dimension classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2616,7 +2616,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-dimension classification<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Tier-C monthly aggregation</td><td>this brief</td></tr><tr><td>Domain (primary)</td><td>Multi-domain — fiscal + energy + criminal-justice + welfare + foreign</td><td>HD03100/HD03240/HD01JuU10/HD01SoU25/UFöU3</td></tr><tr><td>Salience</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>8 primary docs incl. 4 committee closures + 1 supermajoritet sibling</td></tr><tr><td>Window</td><td>30 days (2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25)</td><td>manifest</td></tr><tr><td>Audience</td><td>Decision-makers (analysts, communicators, investors), pre-election</td><td>brief frame</td></tr><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>open-source riksdagen.se data only</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence ceiling</td><td>A1 (structural) / B2 (forward)</td><td>per Admiralty</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-document-level-classification">Document-level classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-level-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-level-classification">Document-level classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-level-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2703,10 +2703,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-level-classification">Document-level classification<a class=
   classDef r fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style V stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Mode</strong>: Tier-C aggregation — siblings ingested per <code>ext/tier-c-aggregation.md</code></p>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested">Sibling synthesis files ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested">Sibling synthesis files ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested"></a></h3>
 <p>The following sibling folders matching <code>analysis/daily/&#x3C;YYYY-MM-DD>/&#x3C;type></code> were read into Pass 1 to establish the 30-day longitudinal picture and carry forward open PIRs:</p>
 
 
@@ -2779,7 +2779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested">Sibling synthesis files ingested<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling path</th><th>Key dok_ids</th><th>Used for</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03100, HD03240, HD03238, HD03239</td><td>Mid-window legislative climax</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01CU25, HD01SfU18, HD01FiU48</td><td>April-22 committee batch</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01FiU48 supermajoritet</td><td>Late-night vote evidence</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/</code> (full set)</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD03100, UFöU3, HD03240, HD03238</td><td>Prior-month baseline; PIRs carried</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01SoU16, HD01SoU17</td><td>Healthcare wedge baseline</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01FiU48 forward indicators</td><td>Month-ahead PIR alignment</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03253, HD03252, HD10447, HD01CU25</td><td>Day-before integration</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23</td><td>Same-day committee siblings</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104</td><td>Government-side props</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD10447 + 15 others</td><td>Opposition wedge taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD024082, HD024096</td><td>Counter-motion choreography</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-13/propositions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03240</td><td>Spring fiscal/energy origin</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings">Cross-reference matrix (this window vs siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings">Cross-reference matrix (this window vs siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2845,27 +2845,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings">Cross-reference matri
   classDef c fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
   classDef d fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#ffffff
   style M25 stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-continuity-of-analytic-line">Continuity of analytic line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-of-analytic-line"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-continuity-of-analytic-line">Continuity of analytic line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-of-analytic-line"></a></h3>
 <p>This monthly review extends <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/</code> by 2 calendar days and integrates the 2026-04-24 closure batch. The dominant analytic claim — <em>the Tidö coalition has completed its declared 2025/26 portfolio with implementation now the binding risk</em> — is <strong>strengthened</strong> by HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24 evidence and <strong>unaltered</strong> in direction.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Standards reference</strong>: ICD 203 (Analytic Standards), Heuer &#x26; Pherson Structured Analytic Techniques</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration">(a) Objectivity / independence of political consideration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration">(a) Objectivity / independence of political consideration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Analyst attestation: no advisory, employment, or financial relationship with any Riksdag party, ministry, or affiliated body in the past 24 months. Source diet (riksdagen.se primary documents + sibling self-references) eliminates source-side political bias.</p>
 <p>⚠️ Residual concern: confirmation bias toward Tidö-delivery thesis given prior monthly review's same conclusion. Mitigation: explicit devils-advocate.md with four competing hypotheses; H1/H2 corrections accepted into mainline.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments">(b) Clear distinction between facts, assumptions, and judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments">(b) Clear distinction between facts, assumptions, and judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Each KJ explicitly labelled with confidence band; PIRs separated from KJs; carried-forward PIRs are explicitly tagged as such.</p>
 <p>⚠️ Forward-poll claims (PIR-A) rely on single-source Demoskop projection — flagged as MEDIUM confidence rather than HIGH; assumption of 4–6 week SOM-lag is methodological assumption, not fact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-c-wep-language">(c) WEP language<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-wep-language"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c-wep-language">(c) WEP language<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-wep-language"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Used "highly likely / likely / possible / unlikely" mapped to numeric probability ranges per Kent Scale; confidence labels (VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / VERY LOW) used consistently.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses">(d) Stress-testing via competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses">(d) Stress-testing via competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Devils-advocate.md applies ACH against 4 hypotheses; H1 (theatre vs delivery) and H2 (SD discipline duration) accepted as mainline corrections.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-e-source-citation">(e) Source citation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-e-source-citation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-e-source-citation">(e) Source citation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-e-source-citation"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ All claims trace to either (i) primary <code>dok_id</code> (HD01CU24, HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD10448, HD11747, HD11748, HD11749), (ii) sibling synthesis files, or (iii) named institutional sources (RiR 2026:6, riksdagen.se).</p>
 <p>⚠️ One claim ("Demoskop 4–6 week SOM-lag") cites general methodology rather than specific report; weakest link in source chain.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-worksheet-status">ACH worksheet status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-worksheet-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-worksheet-status">ACH worksheet status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-worksheet-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2902,30 +2902,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-worksheet-status">ACH worksheet status<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Status</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Mainline (delivery + impl pivot)</td><td>retained, terminology corrected</td><td>adopted</td></tr><tr><td>H1 — theatre, not delivery</td><td>partially accepted</td><td>reword "delivered" → "committed and structurally locked-in"</td></tr><tr><td>H2 — SD strategic patience</td><td>partially accepted</td><td>downgrade SD-discipline confidence June+</td></tr><tr><td>H3 — Trojan disinfo frame</td><td>rejected (insufficient evidence)</td><td>track post-reply media</td></tr><tr><td>H4 — opposition opportunity</td><td>accepted</td><td>strengthens R-2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements">Methodology Improvements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly">Improvement 1: Quantify SOM-lag explicitly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements">Methodology Improvements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly">Improvement 1: Quantify SOM-lag explicitly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: Vague "4–6 week SOM-lag" reference. <strong>Action</strong>: Codify in <code>analysis/methodologies/</code> a calibrated SOM-Demoskop transmission table with citations. <strong>Owner</strong>: data-pipeline-specialist. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-05-15.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard">Improvement 2: Add Polismyndigheten capacity dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard">Improvement 2: Add Polismyndigheten capacity dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: HD01JuU31 implementation tracking is currently narrative-only. <strong>Action</strong>: Build a recurring dashboard on (a) RiR 2026:6 recommendation closure rate, (b) Polismyndigheten Q-on-Q personnel changes, (c) Brå crime statistics. <strong>Owner</strong>: intelligence-operative + data-visualization-specialist. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-06-01.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark">Improvement 3: Counter-motion-rate baseline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark">Improvement 3: Counter-motion-rate baseline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: SD's zero-counter-motion claim relies on sibling synthesis files; lacks Nordic-wide benchmark. <strong>Action</strong>: Build comparator dataset for Denmark/Norway/Finland confidence-coalition counter-motion rates 2018–2025. <strong>Owner</strong>: comparative-international skills set. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-06-30.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection">Improvement 4: Earlier wedge-architecture detection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection">Improvement 4: Earlier wedge-architecture detection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: HD11747/11748/11749 wedge taxonomy was identified <em>after</em> documents appeared rather than predicted. <strong>Action</strong>: Forward-indicators.md template should pre-register wedge categories so detection is faster. <strong>Owner</strong>: news-journalist + analyst-of-record. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-05-08.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle">What worked well this cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle">What worked well this cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Tier-C sibling-folder ingestion gave robust 30-day picture from only 8 fresh primaries.</li>
 <li>✅ DIW ranking remained stable across sensitivity perturbation (top-3 unchanged).</li>
 <li>✅ Carried-forward PIR ledger from 2026-04-23 closed cleanly with vote evidence.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>⚠️ HD03100 fiscal text not directly read this cycle (sibling-only); should refresh quarterly.</li>
 <li>⚠️ Lookback fallback (1-day) means "monthly" is arithmetic only on siblings; document this explicitly in manifest.</li>
 <li>⚠️ One MCP enrichment retry needed.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-in-this-aggregation">Documents in this aggregation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-in-this-aggregation"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-documents-in-this-aggregation">Documents in this aggregation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-in-this-aggregation"></a></h3>
 <p>This monthly review aggregates 8 primary documents from the 2026-04-24 chamber day, supplemented by sibling-day analyses (2026-04-23 monthly-review and the drivmedelsskattepaketet carry-narrative covered in cross-reference-map.md).</p>
 
 
@@ -2988,13 +2988,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-in-this-aggregation">Documents in this aggregation<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01CU24</td><td>bet (CU)</td><td>Byggprocessen — förenklad handläggning</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>bet (JuU)</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>bet (JuU)</td><td>RiR uppföljning Polisreformen</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>bet (SoU)</td><td>Äldreomsorg + anhörigstrategi</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD10448</td><td>ip</td><td>Desinformation om vindkraft</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD11747</td><td>fr</td><td>Lönestöd kontra arbetsmiljö</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD11748</td><td>fr</td><td>Burunditolken Sahabo / mänskliga rättigheter</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD11749</td><td>fr</td><td>Utbildning för barn i förvar</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Source JSON copies stored in <code>documents/</code>. Per-document analyses in <code>documents/&#x3C;DOK_ID>-analysis.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated">Sibling-month context (cross-reference only — not aggregated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated">Sibling-month context (cross-reference only — not aggregated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated"></a></h3>
 <p>The <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> cites prior siblings: 2026-04-23 monthly-review, 2026-04-22 propositions (vårpropositionen), and 2026-04-21 committee-reports (drivmedelsskattepaketet). These are referenced for narrative continuity, not re-aggregated here. Refer to those sibling folders for primary dok_id analyses.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>API: <code>https://data.riksdagen.se</code> open data</li>
 <li>Fetched: 2026-04-25 by <code>scripts/download-parliamentary-data.ts</code> with date=2026-04-24 lookback fallback</li>
 <li>Manifest at <code>manifest.json</code></li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10448-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11747-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11748-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11749-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3056,7 +3090,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T13:40:42.672Z">2026-04-25 13:40 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:35.027Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Additional Resources</h2>
diff --git a/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html b/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html
index b954d9b201..a91e085bd9 100644
--- a/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html
+++ b/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@
     <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200">
     <meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
     <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Riksdagsmonitor Sweden&#039;s 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson">
-    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T13:40:43.147Z">
+    <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:35.167Z">
 
     <meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.hack23.com">
     <meta property="article:section" content="Political Intelligence">
-    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T13:40:43.147Z">
+    <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2026-04-25T15:52:35.167Z">
     <meta property="article:published_time" content="2026-04-25T00:00:00Z">
 
     <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="48x48">
     <link rel="manifest" href="/site.webmanifest">
 
-    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson","description":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) completing its pre-election regulatory portfolio. The April 24 committee batch — HD01JuU10 (new firearms law),…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T13:40:43.147Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu24.json","name":"documents/hd01cu24.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu10.json","name":"documents/hd01juu10.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu31.json","name":"documents/hd01juu31.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01sou25.json","name":"documents/hd01sou25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10448-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd10448.json","name":"documents/hd10448.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11747-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11747.json","name":"documents/hd11747.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11748-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11748.json","name":"documents/hd11748.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11749-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11749.json","name":"documents/hd11749.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
+    <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson","description":"Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) completing its pre-election regulatory portfolio. The April 24 committee batch — HD01JuU10 (new firearms law),…","datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-04-25T15:52:35.167Z","inLanguage":"sv","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html","mainEntityOfPage":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/news/2026-04-25-monthly-review-sv.html","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Riksdagsmonitor (Hack23 AB)","url":"https://www.hack23.com"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Hack23 AB","url":"https://www.hack23.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://riksdagsmonitor.com/images/logo.png"}},"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md","name":"classification-results.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md","name":"coalition-mathematics.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md","name":"comparative-international.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md","name":"cross-reference-map.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md","name":"data-download-manifest.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md","name":"devils-advocate.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01cu24.json","name":"documents/hd01cu24.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu10.json","name":"documents/hd01juu10.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01juu31.json","name":"documents/hd01juu31.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd01sou25.json","name":"documents/hd01sou25.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD10448-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd10448.json","name":"documents/hd10448.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11747-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11747.json","name":"documents/hd11747.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11748-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11748.json","name":"documents/hd11748.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md","name":"documents/HD11749-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/hd11749.json","name":"documents/hd11749.json"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md","name":"election-2026-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md","name":"executive-brief.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md","name":"forward-indicators.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md","name":"historical-parallels.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md","name":"implementation-feasibility.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md","name":"intelligence-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md","name":"media-framing-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md","name":"methodology-reflection.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/README.md","name":"README.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md","name":"risk-assessment.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md","name":"scenario-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md","name":"significance-scoring.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md","name":"stakeholder-perspectives.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md","name":"swot-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md","name":"synthesis-summary.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md","name":"threat-analysis.md"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md","name":"voter-segmentation.md"}]}</script>
 
 
 </head>
@@ -216,22 +216,22 @@ <h2 id="rm-reader-intelligence-guide">Reader Intelligence Guide<a class="" aria-
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Reader need</th><th>What you'll get</th><th>Source artifact</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="#rm-executive-brief">BLUF and editorial decisions</a></td><td>fast answer to what happened, why it matters, who is accountable, and the next dated trigger</td><td><code>executive-brief.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Key Judgments</a></td><td>confidence-bearing political-intelligence conclusions and collection gaps</td><td><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-significance-scoring">Significance scoring</a></td><td>why this story outranks or trails other same-day parliamentary signals</td><td><code>significance-scoring.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-media-framing-analysis">Media framing</a></td><td>likely narrative frames, amplifiers, counter-frames, and manipulation risks</td><td><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-forward-indicators">Forward indicators</a></td><td>dated watch items that let readers verify or falsify the assessment later</td><td><code>forward-indicators.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-scenario-analysis">Scenarios</a></td><td>alternative outcomes with probabilities, triggers, and warning signs</td><td><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-risk-assessment">Risk assessment</a></td><td>policy, electoral, institutional, communications, and implementation risk register</td><td><code>risk-assessment.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence</a></td><td>dok_id-level evidence, named actors, dates, and primary-source traceability</td><td><code>documents/*-analysis.md</code></td></tr><tr><td><a href="#rm-classification-results">Audit appendix</a></td><td>classification, cross-reference, methodology and manifest evidence for reviewers</td><td>appendix artifacts</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-executive-brief">Executive Brief<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-executive-brief"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Classification</strong>: PUBLIC | <strong>Analyst</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25
 <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH [A1] | <strong>Days to Election</strong>: ~141 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-bluf">BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bluf">BLUF<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bluf"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's 30-day legislative window closes with the Kristersson government (M–SD–KD–L) <strong>completing its pre-election regulatory portfolio</strong>. The April 24 committee batch — <strong>HD01JuU10 (new firearms law), HD01JuU31 (police-reform follow-up), HD01SoU25 (elderly-care reinforcement), HD01CU24 (construction-process efficiency)</strong> — clamps the regulatory closure on top of the April 22 fiscal climax (HD01FiU48 fuel-tax relief, M+SD+S+KD supermajority) [riksdagen.se]. Healthcare and crime remain the dominant <em>electoral</em> wedges; opposition interpellation traffic (HD10448 wind-power disinformation, HD11747 work-environment subsidies, HD11749 rights-of-detained children, HD11748 consular-protection in Burundi) shows S/V/MP running a <strong>disciplined three-track narrative</strong> while <strong>SD has filed zero counter-motions</strong> against the four April-24 committee reports — a structural-confidence signal that has now persisted for 18 consecutive sitting days.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment">Decision 1: Pre-election delivery confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports">3 Decisions This Brief Supports<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-3-decisions-this-brief-supports"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment">Decision 1: Pre-election delivery confidence assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-1-pre-election-delivery-confidence-assessment"></a></h4>
 <p>The Tidö coalition has now passed its <strong>complete declared 2025/26 legislative portfolio</strong> in the four core domains — fiscal (HD03100/HD0399), energy (HD03240/HD03238/HD03239), security/defence (UFöU3/HD03214/HD03228), and criminal-justice/welfare (HD01JuU10/HD01JuU31/HD01SoU25) — within 141 days of the September 2026 election. Implementation, not legislation, is now the binding risk. <strong>Recommendation</strong>: pivot monitoring to <em>implementation feasibility</em> (Polismyndigheten capacity post-RiR 2026:6, Miljöprövningsmyndigheten permit throughput, Försäkringskassan elderly-care administrative load).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability">Decision 2: Healthcare-and-crime wedge probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability">Decision 2: Healthcare-and-crime wedge probability<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-2-healthcare-and-crime-wedge-probability"></a></h4>
 <p>The opposition has <em>not</em> succeeded in fracturing the coalition on its primary attack surfaces: SfU18's 39 reservations did not flip a single vote; SD-KD healthcare split on SoU17 R15 was contained. The HD01JuU10 firearms law and HD01JuU31 police-reform audit both pass with M+SD+KD+L unity. <strong>Recommendation</strong>: investors and stakeholders should treat the welfare/security legislation as <em>durable through September 2026</em>; opposition wedge messaging will dominate but legislative reversal probability is LOW (≤ 25%).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture">Decision 3: Pre-campaign opposition narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture">Decision 3: Pre-campaign opposition narrative architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-3-pre-campaign-opposition-narrative-architecture"></a></h4>
 <p>Three opposition wedges crystallised in April: (a) economic — drivmedel/SME-sjuklön (S, HD024082, HD10447); (b) environmental-disinformation — HD10448; (c) rights-of-the-detained / migrant minors / consular protection (V/MP, HD11749, HD11748). <strong>Recommendation</strong>: communicators preparing for the late-summer campaign should expect the disinformation frame (HD10448) to expand into a coalition stress-test for SD specifically; the rights-of-detained frame (HD11749) is V's primary post-prison-expansion attack vector.</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-60-second-read">60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-60-second-read"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 24 committee batch closes regulatory portfolio</strong> — HD01JuU10 + HD01JuU31 + HD01SoU25 + HD01CU24 — pre-election delivery on schedule</li>
 <li>🔴 <strong>April 22 supermajority</strong> (HD01FiU48, M+SD+S+KD): S could not oppose 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax relief 141 days before election</li>
@@ -243,10 +243,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-60-second-read">60-Second Read<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex
 <li>🟢 <strong>Bostadsproduktion</strong> — HD01CU24 kortar handläggningstider; effekt på påbörjade bostäder mätbar Q3 2026 (data.scb.se: BO0101)</li>
 </ul>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-forward-trigger">Top Forward Trigger<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-forward-trigger"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>Monitor</strong>: First post-April-24 SOM Institute or Demoskop opinion poll. If S regains > 28% headline support despite the April 22 fuel-tax-relief vote, S's "symbolic opposition + practical support" message has held under stress and the September election remains a structural toss-up. If S lags below 26%, the M+KD+L bloc's pre-election positioning has demonstrably converted. <strong>Trigger date</strong>: 2026-05-08 ± 5 days (next Demoskop monthly).</p>
 <hr>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-distribution"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -287,17 +287,17 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-distribution">Confidence Distribution<a class="" aria-hidd
   classDef e fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
   style A stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-synthesis-summary">Synthesis Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-synthesis-summary"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling · <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) · <strong>Mode</strong>: Tier-C monthly aggregation
 <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25 (30 days) · <strong>Riksmöte</strong>: 2025/26
 <strong>Admiralty range</strong>: A1–C3 · <strong>WEP language</strong>: "highly likely" / "likely" / "possible" / "unlikely" per Kent Scale
 <strong>Documents analysed</strong>: 8 primary (April 24 closure batch) + 13 sibling synthesis references in window
 <strong>Days to Election 2026</strong>: 141 (target 2026-09-13)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-lead-story-decision-grade">Lead story (decision-grade)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-lead-story-decision-grade"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>The 30-day window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25 closes Sweden's <strong>most consequential pre-election parliamentary month</strong> of riksmöte 2025/26. The Kristersson government has now legislated the entirety of its declared 2025/26 portfolio across four domains: <strong>fiscal pivot</strong> (HD03100 spring proposition + HD0399 spring-amending budget + HD01FiU48 emergency fuel-tax relief, the latter passing 2026-04-22 with an extraordinary M+SD+<strong>S</strong>+KD supermajority), <strong>energy transformation triptych</strong> (HD03240 / HD03238 / HD03239), <strong>security and defence cluster</strong> (UFöU3 NATO eFP Finland deployment + HD03214 cybersecurity centre + HD03228 war-materiel reform), and the <strong>April 24 closure batch</strong> of four committee reports — HD01JuU10 (ny vapenlag), HD01JuU31 (Polisreformen 2015 RiR-uppföljning), HD01SoU25 (äldreomsorg + anhörigstöd), HD01CU24 (effektiv och säker byggprocess). The opposition's parliamentary firepower in the closing week (HD10448 wind-power desinformation; HD11747 lönestöd vs arbetsmiljö; HD11748 Sahabo/Burundi; HD11749 children's right to schooling in custody) signals a clean S–V–MP division of labour entering the 18-week pre-campaign. SD continues to file <strong>zero counter-motions</strong> against open government bills — an 18-day structural-confidence streak.</p>
 </blockquote>
-<h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10, this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10, this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -404,8 +404,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-diw-weighted-ranking-top-10-this-window">DIW-weighted ranking (top 10
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>DIW</th><th>Theme</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>Bet</td><td>4.10</td><td>Drivmedelsskatte­lättnad — fiscal-electoral supermajoritet</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-22</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03100</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.85</td><td>Vårproposition — pre-election fiscal frame</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.60</td><td>Äldreomsorg + anhörigstöd</td><td>A2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01SoU25/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.55</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>A2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01JuU10/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.50</td><td>Polisreformen 2015 — RiR 2026:6 uppföljning</td><td>A2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01JuU31/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>UFöU3</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.50</td><td>NATO eFP Finland 1 200 troops</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-23</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03240</td><td>Prop</td><td>3.40</td><td>Elmarknadsreform</td><td>A1</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Bet</td><td>3.20</td><td>Effektiv och säker byggprocess</td><td>B2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24 (<a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/HD01CU24/">riksdagen.se</a>)</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD10448</td><td>Ip</td><td>2.95</td><td>Desinformation om vindkraft</td><td>B2</td><td>primary 2026-04-24</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD03252</td><td>Prop</td><td>2.90</td><td>Detainee benefit restriction</td><td>B2</td><td>sibling 04-24</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Sensitivity</strong>: Under ±1 DIW tier perturbation the top-3 set is robust. HD01SoU25 ↔ HD01JuU10 swap order possible if pre-campaign issue salience tilts crime-ward; HD01JuU31's <em>implementation</em> weight (Polismyndigheten capacity) gives it the largest forward-leverage among the April-24 batch.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads">Thematic convergence — five threads<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-integrated-intelligence-picture">Integrated intelligence picture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-integrated-intelligence-picture"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads">Thematic convergence — five threads<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads"></a></h4>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>Fiscal-electoral pivot</strong> (HD03100, HD0399, HD01FiU48). The 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax-relief vote (M+SD+S+KD) on 2026-04-22 is the political signature of the month: S's inability to oppose direct household relief 141 days before the election is the single largest <em>measured</em> opposition constraint of the riksmöte.</li>
 <li><strong>Energy transformation</strong> (HD03240 + HD03238 + HD03239). The triptych passes by April 13–22; the April-24 wind-power disinformation interpellation (HD10448) is <em>post hoc</em> opposition counter-framing, not legislative obstruction.</li>
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-thematic-convergence--five-threads">Thematic convergence — five thr
 <li><strong>Criminal-justice / welfare closure</strong> — <em>the April-24 batch</em>. HD01JuU10 (vapenlag) + HD01JuU31 (RiR-uppföljning) modernise crime regulation; HD01SoU25 strengthens elderly-care delivery; HD01CU24 reduces handling time in construction permitting. Together they fill the pre-election regulatory ledger.</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition wedge architecture</strong> — S/V/MP three-track. Economic (HD024082, HD10447), environmental-information (HD10448), rights-of-detained / consular (HD11748, HD11749). C remains procedural-only.</li>
 </ol>
-<h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis">Cross-type signals (Tier-C synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis">Cross-type signals (Tier-C synthesis)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Prop → Motion → Bet → Ip pipeline</strong> is fully visible across the window: HD03100/0399 (fiscal prop) → HD024082 (S counter-motion) → HD01FiU48 (committee → vote) → HD10447 (S interpellation on SME sjuklön).</li>
 <li><strong>Implementation pivot</strong> is the dominant new trend: HD01JuU31 (RiR Polisreformen) recasts criminal-justice debate from <em>legislation</em> to <em>capacity</em>; HD11747 (lönestöd vs farlig arbetsmiljö) raises the same theme on labour side.</li>
@@ -439,52 +439,52 @@ <h3 id="rm-cross-type-signals-tier-c-synthesis">Cross-type signals (Tier-C synth
   classDef b fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffffff
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style F3 stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-statement">Confidence statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-statement"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-statement">Confidence statement<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-statement"></a></h3>
 <p>Overall analytic confidence is <strong>HIGH (A1)</strong> for the structural picture (delivery complete, opposition wedge taxonomy stable, SD discipline visible). Confidence is <strong>MEDIUM (B2)</strong> for forward-poll dynamics (single-source dependence on Demoskop / SOM-lag) and for the precise <em>implementation</em> trajectory of HD01JuU31 (RiR 2026:6 contains 9 open recommendations, none yet closed).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-open-pirs-carried-forward">Open PIRs carried forward<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-open-pirs-carried-forward">Open PIRs carried forward<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-carried-forward"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-1</strong>: Will the M+KD+L bloc convert HD01FiU48 to durable polling lift by 2026-06-01? (carried from 2026-04-23 monthly review)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-2</strong>: Does HD01JuU31's audit produce a Polismyndigheten reorganisation announcement before 2026-08-31?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-3</strong>: Will SD's zero-counter-motion discipline survive the September manifesto launch window?</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments">Intelligence Assessment — Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-intelligence-assessment--key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Issuing officer</strong>: Pether Sörling, Analyst-of-record
 <strong>Date</strong>: 2026-04-25 | <strong>Sourcing</strong>: A1–C3 Admiralty range
 <strong>Standards</strong>: ICD 203 (Analytic Standards) compliance asserted</p>
-<h2 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-bottom-line-up-front">Bottom Line Up Front<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-bottom-line-up-front"></a></h3>
 <p>Sweden's Tidö coalition (M-SD-KD-L) has, within the 30-day window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25, <strong>committed and structurally locked-in</strong> its declared 2025/26 legislative portfolio across all four core domains (fiscal, energy, security/defence, criminal-justice/welfare). The April-24 closure batch (HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24) completes the regulatory ledger. The strategic decision-relevant pivot is from <em>legislation</em> to <em>implementation</em>, with Polismyndigheten capacity (RiR 2026:6) the most binding constraint and healthcare-financing the most exposed wedge.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion">Key Judgment KJ-1 — Legislative completion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-key-judgments">Key Judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion">Key Judgment KJ-1 — Legislative completion<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-1--legislative-completion"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>We assess with HIGH confidence</strong> that the Tidö coalition has committed its declared 2025/26 portfolio in all four domains. The April-24 batch is structurally locked-in even where formal chamber votes are scheduled May, given the 2025/26 confidence-coalition >97% committee-to-chamber conversion rate.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD01CU24 (this window) + HD01FiU48, HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3 (carried) [riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong> (multi-source, internally consistent, robust to red-team H1)</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: A2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high">Key Judgment KJ-2 — Wedge effectiveness LOW; implementation risk HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high">Key Judgment KJ-2 — Wedge effectiveness LOW; implementation risk HIGH<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-2--wedge-effectiveness-low-implementation-risk-high"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>We assess with HIGH confidence</strong> that opposition wedge architecture (S/V/MP three-track) will not produce <em>legislative reversals</em> in the 141-day pre-election window. <strong>We assess with MEDIUM confidence</strong> that implementation friction (R-2 police capacity, R-1 healthcare financing, R-6 construction throughput) will produce <em>politically displaced</em> outcomes that opposition can exploit narratively.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01FiU48 vote pattern (S could not oppose); SD discipline streak; RiR 2026:6 9 open recommendations [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>HIGH</strong> for legislative claim; <strong>MEDIUM</strong> for implementation pathway (single-source on Polismyndigheten timeline)</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15">Key Judgment KJ-3 — Pre-campaign architecture stable through July; uncertain June 15+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15">Key Judgment KJ-3 — Pre-campaign architecture stable through July; uncertain June 15+<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-judgment-kj-3--pre-campaign-architecture-stable-through-july-uncertain-june-15"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>We assess with MEDIUM confidence</strong> that SD's structural discipline (18-day zero-counter-motion streak) is durable through May–early June, but uncertain after the formal pre-campaign window opens (~June 15). Past cycles (2018, 2022) show SD pivot in final 12 weeks.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: 18-day streak (siblings); 2018+2022 base rate; H2 red-team</li>
 <li><strong>Confidence</strong>: <strong>MEDIUM</strong> (calibrated downward by H2)</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-open-pirs-this-cycle">Open PIRs (this cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-this-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir">Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-priority-intelligence-requirements-pir"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-open-pirs-this-cycle">Open PIRs (this cycle)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-open-pirs-this-cycle"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR-A</strong>: Will M+KD+L bloc reach Demoskop ≥ 44% by 2026-07-01? (decision-relevant: Scenario A vs B)</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-B</strong>: Does HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 produce a Polismyndigheten reorganisation announcement by 2026-08-31?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-C</strong>: Does SD discipline survive to manifesto launch (~2026-08-15)?</li>
 <li><strong>PIR-D</strong>: Does the wind-power disinfo frame (HD10448) escalate to a SOM-Institut salience peak by 2026-06-30?</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review">Prior-cycle PIRs — carried forward from 2026-04-23 monthly review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review">Prior-cycle PIRs — carried forward from 2026-04-23 monthly review<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>PIR carried</strong>: ✅ "Will HD01FiU48 receive a chamber vote before April 25?" — <em>Closed:</em> YES, 2026-04-22 supermajoritet documented</li>
 <li><strong>PIR carried (open)</strong>: 🟡 "Will the M-KD-L bloc convert HD01FiU48 into durable polling lift by 2026-06-01?" — <em>Still open</em> (renamed PIR-A above)</li>
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-prior-cycle-pirs--carried-forward-from-2026-04-23-monthly-review">Pri
 <li><strong>Prior PIR closed</strong>: ✅ "Will SD file counter-motions on April-22 fiscal package?" — <em>Closed:</em> NO</li>
 </ul>
 <p>The prior-cycle PIR ledger is maintained in <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md</code> for full audit lineage.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-summary">Confidence summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>KJ</th><th>Confidence</th><th>Admiralty</th><th>Drivers</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>KJ-1</td><td>HIGH</td><td>A2</td><td>Multi-source, robust</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-2</td><td>HIGH (legislative) / MEDIUM (impl)</td><td>B2</td><td>Implementation pathway single-source</td></tr><tr><td>KJ-3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>B3</td><td>Historical base rate uncertainty</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-self-attestation">ICD 203 self-attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-self-attestation"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-self-attestation">ICD 203 self-attestation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-self-attestation"></a></h3>
 <p>This product:</p>
 <ul>
 <li>(a) Is <strong>independent of political consideration</strong> — analyst attests no advisory role with any party.</li>
@@ -533,12 +533,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-icd-203-self-attestation">ICD 203 self-attestation<a class="" aria-hi
 <li>(d) Has been <strong>stress-tested</strong> via devils-advocate.md (4 hypotheses).</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-significance-scoring">Significance Scoring<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-scoring"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) | <strong>Mode</strong>: DIW (Decision-Impact Weighting)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology">Methodology<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology"></a></h3>
 <p>DIW = 0.30·Decisional Salience + 0.25·Reach + 0.20·Reversibility + 0.15·Time-to-Effect + 0.10·Evidence Strength.
 Tier-C monthly multiplier 1.5× applied to base scores; ceiling 4.50.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window">Top-10 ranked items (this 30-day window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window">Top-10 ranked items (this 30-day window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-top-10-ranked-items-this-30-day-window">Top-10 ranked items (this 30-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>dok_id</th><th>DIW</th><th>DS</th><th>R</th><th>Rev</th><th>TTE</th><th>ES</th><th>Theme</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>HD01FiU48</td><td>4.10</td><td>4.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>Drivmedelsskatte­lättnad supermajoritet</td><td>sibling 04-23 <a href="https://www.riksdagen.se/">riksdagen.se</a></td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>HD03100</td><td>3.85</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>Vårproposition 2026</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>3.60</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>Stärkta insatser för äldre</td><td>primary HD01SoU25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>3.55</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>primary HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>3.50</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>Polisreformen 2015 RiR-uppföljning</td><td>primary HD01JuU31</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>UFöU3</td><td>3.50</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>2.5</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>NATO eFP Finland 1 200 troops</td><td>sibling 04-23 [riksdagen.se UFöU3]</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>HD03240</td><td>3.40</td><td>4.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>Elmarknadsreform</td><td>sibling 04-13</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>HD01CU24</td><td>3.20</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>Effektiv och säker byggprocess</td><td>primary HD01CU24</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>HD10448</td><td>2.95</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>Desinformation om vindkraft (Ip)</td><td>primary HD10448</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>HD11749</td><td>2.55</td><td>3.0</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.5</td><td>Utbildning för barn i kriminalvård</td><td>primary HD11749</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-scoring-rationale">Scoring rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-rationale"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scoring-rationale">Scoring rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scoring-rationale"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>HD01FiU48</strong> retains top rank from prior window: M+SD+S+KD supermajority is the single hardest-to-reverse pre-election fiscal commitment of riksmöte 2025/26.</li>
 <li><strong>HD01SoU25</strong> scores 3.60 because elderly-care + carer support is both an electoral salience peak (SOM 2025: omsorg #1 issue) and structurally sticky (kommunalt åtagande, full-cycle implementation > 18 months) [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25].</li>
@@ -710,11 +710,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-scoring-rationale">Scoring rationale<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffffff
   classDef d fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
   style H stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sensitivity-analysis">Sensitivity analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sensitivity-analysis"></a></h3>
 <p>Removing HD01JuU31 (lowest-confidence in committee tier) leaves top-3 unchanged. Adding +0.5 DIW to all April-24 batch items (counterfactual: opposition-led media salience) does not change top-3 rank.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-media-framing-analysis">Media Framing Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-media-framing-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-inventory-this-window">Frame inventory (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-inventory-this-window"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-frame-inventory-this-window">Frame inventory (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-inventory-this-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-inventory-this-window">Frame inventory (this window)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Frame</th><th>Owner</th><th>Hot dok_ids</th><th>Audience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>"Leverans" / delivery</td><td>Tidö</td><td>HD01JuU10, HD01SoU25, HD01CU24</td><td>Storstad-pendlare, pensionärer</td></tr><tr><td>"Praktisk politik"</td><td>S</td><td>HD01FiU48 (S voted YES)</td><td>Förvärvsarbetande</td></tr><tr><td>"Trygghet" / public safety</td><td>M+SD</td><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Pensionärer, glesbygd</td></tr><tr><td>"Polisens kapacitet"</td><td>S+V</td><td>HD01JuU31 RiR</td><td>Förvärvsarbetande, yngre</td></tr><tr><td>"Anhörigfrågan"</td><td>KD primary</td><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Pensionärer, kvinnor 50+</td></tr><tr><td>"Bostäder"</td><td>M+L</td><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Storstad-pendlare, yngre</td></tr><tr><td>"Desinformation som hot"</td><td>MP+S</td><td>HD10448</td><td>Yngre, akademiker</td></tr><tr><td>"Rättigheter / mänskliga rättigheter"</td><td>V+MP</td><td>HD11748, HD11749</td><td>Yngre, akademiker</td></tr><tr><td>"Arbetsmiljö och stöd"</td><td>S</td><td>HD11747</td><td>LO-väljare</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-contest-matrix">Frame contest matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-contest-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-contest-matrix">Frame contest matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-contest-matrix"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title Frame contest x salience x ownership
   x-axis Low Salience --> High Salience
@@ -795,19 +795,19 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-contest-matrix">Frame contest matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
   Desinformation: [0.4, 0.25]
   Rättigheter: [0.35, 0.15]
   Arbetsmiljö: [0.45, 0.2]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon">Pre-campaign salience forecast (2026-09-13 horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon">Pre-campaign salience forecast (2026-09-13 horizon)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-salience-forecast-2026-09-13-horizon"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Trygghet</strong> likely peaks August (HD01JuU10 ikraftträdande Q3) → high benefit to M+SD.</li>
 <li><strong>Anhörig + äldreomsorg</strong> likely peaks early summer (HD01SoU25 implementation) → KD core.</li>
 <li><strong>Polisens kapacitet</strong> is the <em>opposition's</em> peak frame; depends on RiR-uppföljning and any incidents.</li>
 <li><strong>Desinformation</strong> uncertain; H3 (devils-advocate) implies the frame is double-edged for SD. [riksdagen.se HD10448]</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-notable-absences">Notable absences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notable-absences"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-notable-absences">Notable absences<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-notable-absences"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>C is largely <em>off</em> the framing map this window — neither owner nor amplifier of major frames.</li>
 <li>L's media framing is tied to M; insufficient stand-alone identity in window.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-frame-ownership-network">Frame ownership network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-ownership-network"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-frame-ownership-network">Frame ownership network<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-frame-ownership-network"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   T[Tidö-aligned riksdagen.se]:::g --> F1[Leverans HD01JuU10 HD01CU24]:::g
   T --> F2[Trygghet HD01JuU10]:::g
@@ -820,10 +820,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-frame-ownership-network">Frame ownership network<a class="" aria-hidd
   style T stroke-width:3px
   style O stroke-width:3px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-perspectives">Stakeholder Perspectives<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-perspectives"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Lens</strong>: 6-stakeholder map — government parties, opposition parties, agencies, kommuner, media, väljargrupper</p>
-<h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-stakeholder-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-stakeholder-map">Stakeholder map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabind
   classDef r fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   classDef m fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#e0e0e0,color:#e0e0e0
   style G stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics">Cross-stakeholder dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics">Cross-stakeholder dynamics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government–SD</strong>: closure-batch unanimity confirms confidence relationship through pre-campaign.</li>
 <li><strong>S–government</strong>: HD01FiU48 reveals tactical complexity — S supports popular pieces while attacking adjacent themes.</li>
@@ -980,10 +980,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-stakeholder-dynamics">Cross-stakeholder dynamics<a class="" ari
 <li><strong>Kommuner + Försäkringskassan</strong>: HD01SoU25 + HD01CU24 both rely on kommunal kapacitet — overlap creates implementation risk.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-forward-indicators">Forward Indicators<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-indicators"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-26 → 2026-09-13 (election day)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10">Dated indicator ledger (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10">Dated indicator ledger (≥10)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-dated-indicator-ledger-10">Dated indicator ledger (≥10)<a class=""
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Decision relevance</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-05-01</td><td>HD01FiU48 fuel-tax-relief implementerat</td><td>Visible household effect</td><td>HD01FiU48</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-08</td><td>First post-window Demoskop</td><td>PIR-A; Scenario A vs B</td><td>sibling synthesis</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-15</td><td>HD01CU24 chamber vote</td><td>Implementation start</td><td>HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-20</td><td>HD01JuU10 chamber vote</td><td>Crime narrative anchor</td><td>HD01JuU10 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-22</td><td>HD01SoU25 chamber vote</td><td>Anhörigstrategi launch</td><td>HD01SoU25 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-05-28</td><td>HD01JuU31 chamber acceptance</td><td>RiR follow-up codified</td><td>HD01JuU31 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-01</td><td>Vårriksdagens slut</td><td>Last bloc-vote opportunity</td><td>calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Pre-campaign window opens</td><td>T-1 (KJ-3)</td><td>calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-30</td><td>HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi nationell direktör utsedd</td><td>R-1 mitigation</td><td>HD01SoU25</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-30</td><td>Polismyndigheten Q1 RiR-uppföljning­statusrapport</td><td>R-2 binding</td><td>HD01JuU31</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-15</td><td>SCB BO0101 påbörjade bostäder Q2 release</td><td>HD01CU24 effect</td><td>HD01CU24</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-20</td><td>Brå brottsstatistik Q2 release</td><td>HD01JuU10 narrative</td><td>HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>2026-07-30</td><td>Demoskop juli-mätning</td><td>PIR-A confirmation/refutation</td><td>(poll)</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-15</td><td>Pre-campaign manifesto launches expected</td><td>KJ-3 SD-discipline test</td><td>calendar</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-31</td><td>Polismyndigheten reorg-meddelande window close</td><td>PIR-B</td><td>HD01JuU31</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Election day</td><td>terminal</td><td>calendar</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-dependencies">Indicator dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dependencies"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-dependencies">Indicator dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-dependencies"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   D1[2026-05-08 Demoskop]:::a --> D2[2026-05-15..28 Chamber votes]:::b
   D2 --> D3[2026-06-01 Vårriksdagens slut]:::b
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-dependencies">Indicator dependencies<a class="" aria-hidden
   classDef d fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   classDef e fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style D8 stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage">Indicator ranks by decision-leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage">Indicator ranks by decision-leverage<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1141,12 +1141,12 @@ <h2 id="rm-indicator-ranks-by-decision-leverage">Indicator ranks by decision-lev
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Rank</th><th>Indicator</th><th>Why it matters most</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>2026-05-08 Demoskop</td><td>First test of HD01FiU48 conversion</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2026-08-31 Polismyndigheten reorg</td><td>PIR-B closure</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2026-07-15 SCB BO0101</td><td>Empirical HD01CU24 effect</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2026-08-15 Manifesto launches</td><td>KJ-3 SD-discipline endpoint</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>[riksdagen.se HD01FiU48] [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-scenario-analysis">Scenario Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Three-scenario cone + sensitivity ladder; 141-day horizon to 2026-09-13</p>
-<h2 id="rm-baseline-anchor">Baseline anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-anchor"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-baseline-anchor">Baseline anchor<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-baseline-anchor"></a></h3>
 <p>Tidö delivers complete legislative portfolio (HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, April-24 batch) with HD01FiU48 supermajority capping the fiscal pivot. Implementation pivot (HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD01CU24) is now the binding constraint. Opposition has tactical capture but no legislative reversals.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045">Scenario A — <em>Delivery-Lock</em> (probability 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045">Scenario A — <em>Delivery-Lock</em> (probability 0.45)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Tidö converts the legislative completeness into measurable polling lift; Demoskop shows M+KD+L bloc reaching 47% by mid-July; SD holds 18%; S stuck at 25–27%.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-a--delivery-lock-probability-045">Scenario A — <em>Deliver
 <li><strong>Evidence base</strong>: HD01FiU48, HD01JuU10, HD01SoU25 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely">Scenario B — <em>Wedge Stalemate</em> (probability 0.35) — most-likely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely">Scenario B — <em>Wedge Stalemate</em> (probability 0.35) — most-likely<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>M+KD+L bloc holds 41–43% but does not break above; S resilient at 28–30%; SD 17–19%; September election reverts to coalition-arithmetic uncertainty.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-b--wedge-stalemate-probability-035--most-likely">Scenario B
 <li><strong>Evidence base</strong>: HD01SoU25 + HD01SoU17 sibling, HD11749 [riksdagen.se]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015">Scenario C — <em>Implementation Cascade</em> (probability 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015">Scenario C — <em>Implementation Cascade</em> (probability 0.15)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>RiR 2026:6 follow-up reveals deeper Polismyndigheten dysfunction; Brå Q2 brottsstatistik shows uptick; HD01JuU10's launch is overshadowed by capacity story; SD frustration with Polismyndigheten ledning becomes overt.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-c--implementation-cascade-probability-015">Scenario C — <e
 <li><strong>Evidence base</strong>: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6, sibling 2026-04-24 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: C3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005">Scenario D — <em>Tail risk: Geopolitical shock</em> (probability 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005">Scenario D — <em>Tail risk: Geopolitical shock</em> (probability 0.05)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p>Russia/NATO incident or Burundi-style consular escalation reframes campaign mid-cycle; HD11748-class cases multiply.</p>
 </blockquote>
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-d--tail-risk-geopolitical-shock-probability-005">Scenario D
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: C4</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-scenario-summary">Scenario summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-scenario-summary">Scenario summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-scenario-summary"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title Scenario probability × impact
   x-axis Low Probability --> High Probability
@@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-scenario-summary">Scenario summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabi
   B Wedge Stalemate: [0.35, 0.5]
   C Implementation Cascade: [0.15, 0.85]
   D Tail Geopolitical: [0.05, 0.9]</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-decision-implications">Decision implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-implications"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-decision-implications">Decision implications<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-decision-implications"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1229,9 +1229,9 @@ <h2 id="rm-decision-implications">Decision implications<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Audience</th><th>Plan around</th><th>Hedge against</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Communicators</td><td>Scenario B (most-likely)</td><td>Scenario C</td></tr><tr><td>Investors</td><td>Scenario A (delivery-lock)</td><td>Scenario C</td></tr><tr><td>Policy planners</td><td>Scenario A → implementation focus</td><td>Scenario C</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <h2 id="rm-risk-assessment">Risk Assessment<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-risk-assessment"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1) | <strong>Horizon</strong>: April–September 2026</p>
-<h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-dimension risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-dimension risk register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-5-dimension-risk-register"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-5-dimension-risk-register">5-dimension risk register<a class="" aria-
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>ID</th><th>Dimension</th><th>Risk</th><th>Likelihood</th><th>Impact</th><th>Inherent</th><th>Mitigation</th><th>Residual</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R-1</td><td>Political</td><td>Healthcare wedge fractures coalition on HD01SoU25 financing</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Treasury-side amendment in autumn budget</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01SoU25 + sibling SoU17 [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>R-2</td><td>Operational</td><td>Polismyndigheten kapacitetsbrist försenar HD01JuU10 implementering</td><td>HIGH</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Allokering i höstbudget; RiR-genomförandeplan</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>R-3</td><td>Reputational</td><td>Wind-disinfo frame slår tillbaka mot regeringsblock</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Energiministerns proaktiva svar</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</td></tr><tr><td>R-4</td><td>Legal</td><td>Konsulärt skydd otillräckligt — Sahabo-fallet</td><td>LOW</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>UD-resursförstärkning</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</td></tr><tr><td>R-5</td><td>Electoral</td><td>M+KD+L bloc misslyckas omsätta leverans till stöd före 2026-09-13</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>HIGH</td><td>Pre-campaign valbudget Q3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01FiU48 + sibling 04-23 monthly review</td></tr><tr><td>R-6</td><td>Implementation</td><td>Construction-permit reform ger inte mätbar effekt på påbörjade bostäder före val</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>SCB BO0101 monitoring + tertialuppföljning</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr><tr><td>R-7</td><td>Information</td><td>Lönestöd-arbetsmiljö samordningsbrist eskalerar</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Tillväxtverket-Arbetsmiljöverket MoU</td><td>LOW</td><td>HD11747 [riksdagen.se HD11747]</td></tr><tr><td>R-8</td><td>Rights</td><td>V/MP-frame om barn i kriminalvård når mediegenombrott</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Skolverket-IVO-kriminalvård gemensamt direktiv</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual">Heat map (likelihood × impact, residual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual">Heat map (likelihood × impact, residual)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">quadrantChart
   title Risk heat map (residual)
   x-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
@@ -1363,15 +1363,15 @@ <h2 id="rm-heat-map-likelihood--impact-residual">Heat map (likelihood × impact,
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffffff
   classDef d fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#00d9ff
   style A stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-top-3-risks-expanded">Top-3 risks expanded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-risks-expanded"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-top-3-risks-expanded">Top-3 risks expanded<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-top-3-risks-expanded"></a></h3>
 <p><strong>R-5 (Electoral conversion)</strong>: Most consequential — even with perfect legislative delivery, polling lift is not automatic. Demoskop/SOM lag 4–6 weeks. <strong>Trigger date</strong>: Demoskop 2026-05-08 ± 5 d.</p>
 <p><strong>R-2 (Police capacity)</strong>: RiR 2026:6 names 9 open recommendations; HD01JuU10's effective enforcement depends on closing them. Capacity lag means HD01JuU10's <em>deterrent</em> signalling effect is decoupled from operational outcome.</p>
 <p><strong>R-1 (Healthcare wedge)</strong>: HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi has no dedicated funding line in HD03100 — opposition will exploit. Needs Q3 2026 amendment.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-swot-analysis">SWOT Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-swot-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Subject</strong>: Tidö coalition position 141 days before September 2026 election</p>
-<h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-tows-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-tows-matrix">TOWS matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Opportunities</th><th>Threats</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Strengths</strong></td><td>SO: Convert delivered portfolio (HD01FiU48 + April-24 batch) into pre-campaign frame [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</td><td>ST: Use SD discipline (zero counter-motions) to deflect coalition-cohesion attacks [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Weaknesses</strong></td><td>WO: Address Polismyndigheten capacity gap with budget signal [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td><td>WT: Healthcare opposition (S+V+MP+C+L division-of-labour) on SoU17/SoU25 reservations [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-strengths"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-strengths">Strengths<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Complete pre-election regulatory ledger across 4 domains</td><td>HD03100, HD03240, UFöU3, HD01JuU10 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>4.1 GSEK fuel-tax supermajority demonstrates opposition capture</td><td>HD01FiU48 — M+SD+S+KD vote 2026-04-22 [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</td></tr><tr><td>SD structural discipline — 18-day zero-counter-motion streak</td><td>sibling synthesis 2026-04-22..24 [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>New firearms framework modernises crime regulation</td><td>HD01JuU10 — JuU vote pending May [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</td></tr><tr><td>Construction-permit acceleration unlocks bostadsbyggande</td><td>HD01CU24 — civilutskottet betänkande [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-weaknesses"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-weaknesses">Weaknesses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" hr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RiR 2026:6 documents kvardröjande lednings- och utredningsproblem i Polismyndigheten</td><td>HD01JuU31 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Anhörigstrategi har ingen tillförd finansieringspost i HD03100</td><td>HD01SoU25 + HD03100 cross-read [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>Lönestöd-vs-arbetsmiljö samordning brister institutionellt</td><td>HD11747 [riksdagen.se HD11747]</td></tr><tr><td>Konsulärt skydd har resursbegränsningar (Sahabo-fallet)</td><td>HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-opportunities"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-opportunities">Opportunities<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pre-campaign regulatory closure ger M+KD+L förutsägbar leveransberättelse</td><td>HD03100 + April-24 batch [riksdagen.se]</td></tr><tr><td>Implementation pivot ger Tidö andra runda av "leverans"-tema</td><td>HD01JuU31 RiR-uppföljning [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Energy disinformation frame kan stärka SD som "common-sense"-aktör</td><td>HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</td></tr><tr><td>Construction-permit reform alignerar med urban väljarskifte</td><td>HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threats"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-threats">Threats<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#r
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Item</th><th>Evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S+V+MP healthcare-attack på SoU25 anhörigstöd-finansiering</td><td>HD01SoU25 [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>V+MP rättighets­frame (kriminalvård/konsulärt) når mediepunkter</td><td>HD11748 + HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749]</td></tr><tr><td>Polisreform-RiR ger oppositionen kapacitetskritik</td><td>HD01JuU31 + RiR 2026:6 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Wind-power disinformation-frame är dubbelriktad — kan slå tillbaka mot SD</td><td>HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-visual-tows-overview">Visual TOWS overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-tows-overview"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-visual-tows-overview">Visual TOWS overview<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-visual-tows-overview"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   S[Strengths HD01FiU48 HD01JuU10]:::s --> SO[SO match HD01SoU25 anhörig]:::so
   W[Weaknesses HD01JuU31 HD01SoU25 finansiering]:::w --> WT[WT mitigation HD03100 sibling]:::wt
@@ -1520,11 +1520,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-visual-tows-overview">Visual TOWS overview<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
   style SO stroke-width:2px
   style WT stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-threat-analysis">Threat Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Framework</strong>: Political Threat Taxonomy (institutional, electoral, informational, implementation)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-register">Threat register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional">T-1: Coalition cohesion erosion (institutional)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-register">Threat register<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-register"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional">T-1: Coalition cohesion erosion (institutional)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: SoU17 R15 (sibling) flagged SD–KD healthcare divergence; HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi could re-trigger.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: LOW (≤25%) — SD has held discipline 18 sitting days.</li>
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-1-coalition-cohesion-erosion-institutional">T-1: Coalition cohesion
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01SoU25, sibling SoU17 [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation">T-2: Implementation deficit cascade (implementation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation">T-2: Implementation deficit cascade (implementation)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 reveals 9 open Polismyndigheten recommendations; HD01CU24 depends on kommunal kapacitet.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: HIGH — historical base rate from prior reform cycles.</li>
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-2-implementation-deficit-cascade-implementation">T-2: Implementatio
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD01JuU31, HD01CU24 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: A2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational">T-3: Information-environment threat (informational)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational">T-3: Information-environment threat (informational)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: HD10448 explicitly raises wind-power disinformation as a <em>parliamentary</em> concern. The frame can be turned against any actor — including the originator.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: MEDIUM — ongoing anti-renewable campaigns documented in Sweden since 2023.</li>
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-3-information-environment-threat-informational">T-3: Information-en
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD10448 [riksdagen.se HD10448]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral">T-4: Electoral wedge effectiveness (electoral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral">T-4: Electoral wedge effectiveness (electoral)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: S/V/MP three-track wedges (economic / informational / rights-of-detained) coordinate without formal coalition.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: MEDIUM — wedge architecture is mature.</li>
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-4-electoral-wedge-effectiveness-electoral">T-4: Electoral wedge eff
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD024082 sibling, HD11747, HD11748, HD11749 [riksdagen.se HD11749]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B2</li>
 </ul>
-<h3 id="rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external">T-5: Foreign-policy reputational threat (institutional / external)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external">T-5: Foreign-policy reputational threat (institutional / external)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Vector</strong>: Sahabo-fallet (HD11748) — Swedish citizen detained abroad raises consular-protection capacity question.</li>
 <li><strong>Likelihood</strong>: LOW — single case.</li>
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-t-5-foreign-policy-reputational-threat-institutional--external">T-5:
 <li><strong>Evidence</strong>: HD11748 [riksdagen.se HD11748]</li>
 <li><strong>Admiralty</strong>: B3</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping">Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping">Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-confidence-and-atp-2334-mapping">Confidence and ATP-2.33.4 mapping<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Threat</th><th>Confidence</th><th>NATO ATP-2.33.4 alignment</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>T-1</td><td>HIGH</td><td>political stability surveillance</td></tr><tr><td>T-2</td><td>HIGH</td><td>governance capacity assessment</td></tr><tr><td>T-3</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>information environment monitoring</td></tr><tr><td>T-4</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>political opposition dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>T-5</td><td>LOW</td><td>consular / diaspora</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-threat-surface-diagram">Threat surface diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-surface-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-threat-surface-diagram">Threat surface diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-threat-surface-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
   W[Window 2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25]:::a --> T1[T1 capacity gap HD01JuU31 riksdagen.se]:::r
   W --> T2[T2 finansieringsbrist HD01SoU25 anhörig]:::r
@@ -1619,185 +1619,185 @@ <h2 id="rm-threat-surface-diagram">Threat surface diagram<a class="" aria-hidden
   style T2 stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-per-document-intelligence">Per-document intelligence<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-per-document-intelligence"></a></h2>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01cu24">HD01CU24<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01cu24"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: CU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01CU24 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary"></a></h3>
 <p>Reformpaket för förenklad byggprocess och kortare kommunala handläggningstider; instämmer i regeringens förslag med vissa följdmotioner.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>M (regeringsförslag)</li>
 <li>KD/L medverkar</li>
 <li>S följdmotion finansiering</li>
 <li>C tekniska reservationer</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance"></a></h3>
 <p>Tidö-leverans i bostadsfrågan; mätbar effekt via SCB BO0101 från Q3 2026; relevant för storstad-pendlare-segmentet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading"></a></h3>
 <p>Implementeringsrisken ligger på kommunal handläggar­kapacitet, inte på lagtexten. Effekt på påbörjade bostäder syns tidigast 2026-Q3.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01cu24.json">riksdagen.se HD01CU24</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01cu24.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01juu10">HD01JuU10<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01juu10"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: JuU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01JuU10 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-1">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Ny vapenlag med skärpta tillstånds- och vapenregister­krav; IT-modernisering av vapenregistret krävs; ikraftträdande planerat Q3 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-1">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-1">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>M+SD primära avsändare</li>
 <li>KD/L stöder</li>
 <li>V/MP partiella reservationer</li>
 <li>Polismyndigheten implementeringsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-1">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Centralt narrativ för 'trygghet'-frame; Tidöns största kriminalpolitiska leverans i 2025/26-mötet; konsoliderar SD-väljare.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-1">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-1">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-1"></a></h3>
 <p>Implementeringen är beroende av att RiR-rekommendationerna i HD01JuU31 stängs; risk för operativ flaskhals hos Polismyndigheten.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-1">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-1"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-1">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-1"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01juu10.json">riksdagen.se HD01JuU10</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01juu10.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01juu31">HD01JuU31<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01juu31"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: JuU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01JuU31 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-2">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Riksrevisionens andra uppföljning av Polisreformen 2015; 9 öppna rekommendationer; utskottet kräver statusrapport Q3 2026.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-2">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-2">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>RiR (Riksrevisionen) avsändare</li>
 <li>JuU-utskott (S+M+SD+KD+L+V+MP+C konsensus)</li>
 <li>Polismyndigheten implementeringsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-2">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Avslöjar kapacitetsglappet bakom HD01JuU10; politiskt verktyg för opposition men formellt accepterat av Tidö.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-2">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-2">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-2"></a></h3>
 <p>Operativ förändring osannolik före september-valet 2026; effekten är narrativ — exponerar gap mellan ambition och kapacitet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-2">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-2"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-2">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-2"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01juu31.json">riksdagen.se HD01JuU31</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01juu31.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd01sou25">HD01SoU25<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd01sou25"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: SoU | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD01SoU25 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-3">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Nationell anhörigstrategi och förstärkt äldreomsorg; KD primär avsändare; finansiering ej fullt täckt i HD03100 vårpropositionen.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-3">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-3">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>KD primär</li>
 <li>M+L stöder</li>
 <li>S följdmotion fokus på finansiering</li>
 <li>V kompletterande reservation</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-3">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Direkt-leverans till pensionärs- och kvinnor-50+-segmenten; bär KD:s identitetspolitik; finansieringsbristen är fragility (R-1).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-3">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-3">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-3"></a></h3>
 <p>Implementeringen kräver nationell direktör (utses 2026-06-30) och kommunal kapacitet; effekt synlig först 2026 H2.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-3">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-3"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-3">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-3"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd01sou25.json">riksdagen.se HD01SoU25</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd01sou25.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd10448">HD10448<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd10448"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10448-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Ip | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD10448 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-4">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Interpellation från MP/S till energiminister om systematisk desinformation om vindkraft i kommunala beslutsprocesser; svar 2026-05-06.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-4">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-4">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>MP+S avsändare</li>
 <li>Energiminister svarsbärare</li>
 <li>kommuner Norrbotten/Västerbotten primär kontext</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-4">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Första parlamentariska eko av 2023 års vindkraftsmotståndsvåg; testar regeringens förmåga att hantera disinformation utan att alienera SD-bas.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-4">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-4">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-4"></a></h3>
 <p>Frame är dubbelbottnad — gynnar opposition på storstad/yngre men kan förlora för MP+S i glesbygd; H3 i devils-advocate.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-4">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-4"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-4">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-4"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd10448.json">riksdagen.se HD10448</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd10448.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd11747">HD11747<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11747"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11747-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Fr | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD11747 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-5">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Skriftlig fråga från S-ledamot om bristande arbetsmiljöuppföljning vid lönestödsanställningar; svar inom 4 dagar.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-5">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-5">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>S-ledamot avsändare</li>
 <li>Arbetsmarknadsminister svarsbärare</li>
 <li>Arbetsförmiljöverket</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-5">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-5">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-5"></a></h3>
 <p>S:s primära attackkanal mot Tidö i förvärvsarbetande LO/TCO-segmentet; etablerar 'arbetsmiljö och stöd'-frame inför kampanj.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-5">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-5">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-5"></a></h3>
 <p>Liten omedelbar effekt men bygger berättelse-arsenal till manifest-fasen 2026-08.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-5">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-5"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-5">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-5"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11747.json">riksdagen.se HD11747</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd11747.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd11748">HD11748<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11748"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11748-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Fr | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD11748 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-6">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Skriftlig fråga från V-ledamot om svensk hantering av Burundi-tolken Sahabo; mänskliga rättigheter och utlämning.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-6">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-6">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V-ledamot avsändare</li>
 <li>Migrationsminister + UD svarsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-6">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-6">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Mindre väljarbas-relevans men hög aktivist-betydelse; bygger V:s mänskliga-rättigheter-profil i yngre/akademiker-segment.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-6">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-6">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-6"></a></h3>
 <p>Ingen omedelbar policy-effekt; ingår i V:s pre-kampanjnarrativ.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-6">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-6"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-6">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-6"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11748.json">riksdagen.se HD11748</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd11748.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h3 id="rm-hd11749">HD11749<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hd11749"></a></h3>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11749-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Organ</strong>: Fr | <strong>dok_id</strong>: HD11749 | <strong>Window</strong>: 2026-04-25 monthly review
 <strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM-HIGH (B2)</p>
-<h2 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-summary-7">Summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-summary-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Skriftlig fråga från V-ledamot om brister i undervisning för barn placerade i förvar; barnkonventionsöverväganden.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-actors-7">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-actors-7">Key actors<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-actors-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>V-ledamot avsändare</li>
 <li>Migrationsminister + utbildningsminister svarsbärare</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-significance-7">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-significance-7">Significance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-significance-7"></a></h3>
 <p>V:s starkaste yngre-väljare-signal i window; rättigheter-frame; potentiell följdmotion i SoU eller UbU.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-7">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-evidence-and-reading-7">Evidence and reading<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-evidence-and-reading-7"></a></h3>
 <p>Liten omedelbar effekt men hög sammanlänkning med Yngre 18-29-segmentet.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-source-7">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-7"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-source-7">Source<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-source-7"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>Primary: <a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/hd11749.json">riksdagen.se HD11749</a></li>
 <li>Companion JSON: <code>documents/hd11749.json</code></li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-election-2026-analysis">Election 2026 Analysis<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-election-2026-analysis"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (B2)
 <strong>Election date</strong>: 2026-09-13 | <strong>Days remaining</strong>: 141</p>
-<h2 id="rm-pre-campaign-architecture">Pre-campaign architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-architecture"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-pre-campaign-architecture">Pre-campaign architecture<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-campaign-architecture"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Government bloc</strong>: M, KD, L, SD-confidence — entered window with 173/349-seat working majority</li>
 <li><strong>Opposition</strong>: S 107 / V 24 / MP 18 / C 24 — 173 (mirror)</li>
 <li><strong>Tied chamber arithmetic</strong> is the structural feature; wedge politics dominates</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-window-end-snapshot">Window-end snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-end-snapshot"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-window-end-snapshot">Window-end snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-end-snapshot"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TB
   E[Election 2026-09-13 — riksdagen.se context]:::a
   E --> G[Government bloc M+KD+L+SD-confidence ~179 seats]:::g
@@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-window-end-snapshot">Window-end snapshot<a class="" aria-hidden="true
   style E stroke-width:3px
   style G stroke-width:2px
   style O stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-window-dynamics-summary">Window dynamics summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-dynamics-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-window-dynamics-summary">Window dynamics summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-dynamics-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-window-dynamics-summary">Window dynamics summary<a class="" aria-hidd
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Driver</th><th>Effect on M+KD+L</th><th>Effect on S</th><th>Effect on SD</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01FiU48 supermajoritet (carried)</td><td>+ 1.5 ppt</td><td>flat (S voted YES)</td><td>+ 0.3 ppt</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU10 vapenlag</td><td>+ 0.4 ppt (M crime narrative)</td><td>– 0.2 ppt</td><td>+ 0.5 ppt (base mobilisation)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31 RiR-uppföljning</td><td>– 0.3 ppt (capacity gap exposed)</td><td>+ 0.5 ppt</td><td>flat</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25 äldreomsorg</td><td>+ 0.6 ppt (KD core voter)</td><td>+ 0.3 ppt (S funding attack)</td><td>flat</td></tr><tr><td>HD10448 desinfo Ip</td><td>– 0.2 ppt</td><td>flat</td><td>– 0.4 ppt (frame ambiguity)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Net window effect</strong>: M+KD+L bloc +2.0 ppt, S +0.6 ppt, SD +0.4 ppt — <strong>inside polling noise</strong>, not yet structural shift.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-forward-dates">Key forward dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-forward-dates"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-forward-dates">Key forward dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-forward-dates"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1901,11 +1901,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-forward-dates">Key forward dates<a class="" aria-hidden="true" ta
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Event</th><th>Decision relevance</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2026-05-08</td><td>First post-window Demoskop</td><td>PIR-A</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-01</td><td>Vårriksdagens slut</td><td>last bloc-vote opportunity</td></tr><tr><td>2026-06-15</td><td>Pre-campaign window opens</td><td>T-1, KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td>2026-08-15</td><td>Manifesto launches expected</td><td>KJ-3</td></tr><tr><td>2026-09-13</td><td>Election</td><td>terminal</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sources">Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sources"></a></h3>
 <p>HD01FiU48 sibling, HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD10448 [riksdagen.se]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-coalition-mathematics">Coalition Mathematics<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-mathematics"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526">Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526">Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-seat-baseline-riksmöte-202526">Seat baseline (riksmöte 2025/26)<a c
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Seats</th><th>Bloc</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Socialdemokraterna (S)</td><td>107</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Moderaterna (M)</td><td>68</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Sverigedemokraterna (SD)</td><td>73</td><td>Confidence</td></tr><tr><td>Vänsterpartiet (V)</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td>Centerpartiet (C)</td><td>24</td><td>Opposition (procedural)</td></tr><tr><td>Kristdemokraterna (KD)</td><td>19</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Liberalerna (L)</td><td>16</td><td>Government</td></tr><tr><td>Miljöpartiet (MP)</td><td>18</td><td>Opposition</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>349</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Government bloc (M+KD+L): 103. With SD confidence: 176. <strong>Working majority: 3 seats above 175 threshold</strong> (4 with SD discipline).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried">Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (carried)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried">Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (carried)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2042,7 +2042,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-key-window-vote--hd01fiu48-carried">Key window vote — HD01FiU48 (ca
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Party</th><th>Ja</th><th>Nej</th><th>Avstår</th><th>Frånvarande</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M</td><td>65</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>71</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>KD</td><td>18</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>14</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>95</td><td>0</td><td>12</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>0</td><td>22</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>0</td><td>16</td><td>0</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>22</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>263</strong></td><td><strong>38</strong></td><td><strong>34</strong></td><td><strong>14</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>[riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</p>
 <p><strong>Reading</strong>: M+SD+S+KD = 263 Ja → unprecedented multi-bloc supermajority on fuel-tax relief.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026">Forward votes (pending May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026">Forward votes (pending May 2026)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2079,7 +2079,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-votes-pending-may-2026">Forward votes (pending May 2026)<a cl
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Issue</th><th>Ja-projection</th><th>Nej-projection</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+(C? L?) ≥ 195</td><td>V+MP partially</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>RiR Polisreformen</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+S formal acceptance</td><td>none expected</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Äldreomsorg</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+ partial S</td><td>partial V</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Byggprocess</td><td>M+SD+KD+L+C</td><td>partial V/MP</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election">Coalition arithmetic — September 2026 election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election">Coalition arithmetic — September 2026 election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   M[M+KD+L 103]:::g --> B1{Bloc 175?}
   SD[SD 73]:::sd --> B1
@@ -2100,8 +2100,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-coalition-arithmetic--september-2026-election">Coalition arithmetic 
   style B1 stroke-width:2px
   style B2 stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-voter-segmentation">Voter Segmentation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-voter-segmentation"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-segments-tracked-this-window">Segments tracked (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segments-tracked-this-window"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-segments-tracked-this-window">Segments tracked (this window)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-segments-tracked-this-window"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2156,14 +2156,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-segments-tracked-this-window">Segments tracked (this window)<a class=
   "Yngre 18-29" : 14
   "SME / egna företagare" : 7
   "Övriga" : 5</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-window-movement-qualitative">Window movement (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-movement-qualitative"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-window-movement-qualitative">Window movement (qualitative)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-window-movement-qualitative"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Pensionärer</strong>: HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi is <em>direct delivery</em>; finansieringsbrist (R-1) is the only fragility.</li>
 <li><strong>Glesbygd</strong>: HD01FiU48 fuel-tax is consolidating; HD10448 wind-disinfo frame is divisive within segment.</li>
 <li><strong>Förvärvsarbetande LO/TCO</strong>: HD11747 lönestöd-arbetsmiljö story is S's primary attack channel; HD01JuU10 firearms law popular.</li>
 <li><strong>Yngre</strong>: HD11749 rights-of-detained children scheme is V's strongest young-voter signal.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-segment-messaging-map">Cross-segment messaging map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-messaging-map"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-segment-messaging-map">Cross-segment messaging map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-messaging-map"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2205,7 +2205,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-segment-messaging-map">Cross-segment messaging map<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Coalition</th><th>Primary segments</th><th>Key window evidence</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>M+KD+L</td><td>Storstad-pendlare + Pensionärer + SME</td><td>HD01CU24, HD01SoU25, HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>SD</td><td>Glesbygd + Pensionärer</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD01JuU10</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Förvärvsarbetande + Pensionärer</td><td>HD11747, HD024082</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>Yngre + LO</td><td>HD11749, HD11748</td></tr><tr><td>MP</td><td>Yngre + Storstad-pendlare</td><td>HD10448</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Företagare + Glesbygd</td><td>(procedural this window)</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-segment-flow">Cross-segment flow<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-flow"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-segment-flow">Cross-segment flow<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-segment-flow"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   V[Voter segments 2026 riksdagen.se context]:::a --> P1[Pensionärer KD HD01SoU25]:::p
   V --> G1[Glesbygd SD HD01FiU48]:::g
@@ -2220,11 +2220,11 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-segment-flow">Cross-segment flow<a class="" aria-hidden="true"
   classDef l fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style V stroke-width:3px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-comparative-international">Comparative International<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparative-international"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Method</strong>: Cross-Nordic + EU peer comparison on the four delivered portfolios</p>
 <p><strong>Comparator set</strong>: Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, Netherlands</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election">Comparator table — fiscal pivot to election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election">Comparator table — fiscal pivot to election<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table--fiscal-pivot-to-election">Comparator table — fisc
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Election</th><th>Pre-election fiscal action</th><th>Coalition pattern</th><th>Outcome lesson</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden 2026</td><td>2026-09-13</td><td>HD01FiU48 4.1 GSEK fuel-tax (M+SD+S+KD)</td><td>M-SD-KD-L confidence</td><td>live observation [riksdagen.se HD01FiU48]</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark 2022</td><td>2022-11-01</td><td>Energy tilbagebetaling pre-election</td><td>SocDem majority</td><td>delivered → polling lift sustained</td></tr><tr><td>Norway 2021</td><td>2021-09-13</td><td>Strømstønad + drivstoffrabatt pre-poll</td><td>Ap-Sp majority</td><td>delivered → polling held</td></tr><tr><td>Finland 2023</td><td>2023-04-02</td><td>Energiakompensaatio late spring</td><td>Centre-right turnover</td><td>popular but not decisive</td></tr><tr><td>Germany 2025</td><td>2025-02-23</td><td>Energy price cap extension</td><td>CDU/CSU+SPD coalition</td><td>delivered → election win</td></tr><tr><td>Netherlands 2023</td><td>2023-11-22</td><td>Box-3 reform deferral</td><td>Caretaker</td><td>implementation gap exposed</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Across 5 Nordic + EU peers, fiscal pre-election household relief delivered 4–6 months before vote correlates with polling stability (median +1.8 ppt for incumbent block) but rarely delivers >3 ppt lift. Sweden's HD01FiU48 sits within this band — supports Scenario B (Wedge Stalemate).</p>
-<h2 id="rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up">Comparator table — police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up">Comparator table — police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2324,7 +2324,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-comparator-table--police-reform-follow-up">Comparator table — polic
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Jurisdiction</th><th>Reform</th><th>Audit follow-up</th><th>Outcome</th><th>Sweden parallel</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden 2015→2026</td><td>Polisreformen 2015</td><td>RiR 2026:6 → HD01JuU31</td><td>implementation gap</td><td>live [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark 2007</td><td>Politireformen</td><td>Rigsrevisionen 2010 + 2014</td><td>7-yr stabilisation</td><td>implementation pivot is multi-year</td></tr><tr><td>Norway 2016</td><td>Nærpolitireformen</td><td>Riksrevisjonen 2018 + 2021</td><td>partial closure</td><td>mid-decade audit cycle typical</td></tr><tr><td>Finland 2014</td><td>Police restructure</td><td>VTV 2017</td><td>quicker closure</td><td>smaller administrative footprint matters</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Pattern</strong>: Police reorganisation audits in the Nordic region typically cycle through two follow-up rounds before recommendations close. RiR 2026:6 + HD01JuU31 represent the <em>first</em> follow-up; expect a second around 2029.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark">Cross-Nordic coalition-discipline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark">Cross-Nordic coalition-discipline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2363,29 +2363,29 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-nordic-coalition-discipline-benchmark">Cross-Nordic coalition-d
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Country</th><th>Coalition type</th><th>Pre-election counter-motion rate</th><th>Sweden 2026</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sweden</td><td>Confidence (M-KD-L + SD external)</td><td>0/18 sitting days</td><td>ANOMALOUSLY HIGH discipline</td></tr><tr><td>Denmark</td><td>SVM majority 2022</td><td>~7% counter-motion rate pre-2024 EU</td><td>typical</td></tr><tr><td>Norway</td><td>Ap-Sp 2021</td><td>~5% pre-2025</td><td>typical</td></tr><tr><td>Finland</td><td>Centre-right Orpo 2023</td><td>~9% pre-2027</td><td>typical</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p><strong>Implication</strong>: SD's 18-day zero-counter-motion streak is <strong>outside the Nordic norm</strong> and reads as a deliberate pre-election signal of confidence-relationship durability.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-historical-parallels">Historical Parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-historical-parallels"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-selected-parallels">Selected parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-selected-parallels"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot">Pre-election fiscal pivot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot"></a></h3>
+
+<h3 id="rm-selected-parallels">Selected parallels<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-selected-parallels"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot">Pre-election fiscal pivot<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-pre-election-fiscal-pivot"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2014 Reinfeldt → Löfven</strong>: Spring 2014 alliance-bloc tax restraint pre-election; opposition won despite delivery.</li>
 <li><strong>2018 Löfven I-II transition</strong>: Fiscal package autumn 2017; supermajority not achieved; tied election result.</li>
 <li><strong>2022 Andersson → Kristersson</strong>: spring 2022 elenergistöd; popular but coalition lost narrowly. [riksdagen.se HD03100 sibling]</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Fiscal pre-election delivery is necessary but rarely sufficient (mean polling lift 4-6 weeks post-vote: +1.8 ppt for incumbent bloc, n=4 cycles).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-police-reform-follow-up">Police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-police-reform-follow-up"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-police-reform-follow-up">Police-reform follow-up<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-police-reform-follow-up"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2010 Politireformen DK</strong>: Two follow-up audits; 7-yr stabilisation cycle; HD01JuU31 ≈ first follow-up. [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</li>
 <li><strong>Polisreformen 2015 (Sweden)</strong>: Riksrevisionen 2018, 2021, now 2026:6. Recommendations close at ~30%/audit cycle.</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: HD01JuU31 will not produce visible operational change before September election; political effect is <em>narrative</em>.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-confidence-coalition-discipline">Confidence-coalition discipline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-coalition-discipline"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-confidence-coalition-discipline">Confidence-coalition discipline<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-confidence-coalition-discipline"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2014–2018 alliance under Löfven</strong>: counter-motion rate ≈ 8%; modest discipline.</li>
 <li><strong>2018–2022 januariavtal</strong>: ~5%; high discipline because formal contract.</li>
 <li><strong>2022– Tidöavtalet</strong>: 2025/26 Q1–Q2 ≈ 1.5%; 18-day zero-streak in this window. [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</li>
 </ul>
 <p><strong>Lesson</strong>: Tidöavtalet's discipline is <em>outside</em> historical norms; explanations either institutional (formal contract effect) or strategic (single-cycle pre-election) — H2 in devils-advocate stresses the latter.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle">Wind-power disinformation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle">Wind-power disinformation cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle"></a></h4>
 <ul>
 <li><strong>2023 vindkraftsmotstånd Q3</strong>: Norrbotten/Västerbotten kommunala vetoexplosion. HD10448 is the first parliamentary echo of that cycle. [riksdagen.se HD10448]</li>
 </ul>
@@ -2395,7 +2395,7 @@ <h3 id="rm-wind-power-disinformation-cycle">Wind-power disinformation cycle<a cl
   2018 : Löfven transition : tied election
   2022 : Andersson elenergistöd : narrow opposition win
   2026 : Tidö portfolio + supermajoritet : pending September</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-cycle-parallels-diagram">Cycle parallels diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cycle-parallels-diagram"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cycle-parallels-diagram">Cycle parallels diagram<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cycle-parallels-diagram"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart LR
   H[Historical pre-election cycles riksdagen.se]:::a --> H1[2014 alliance fiscal pivot]:::b
   H --> H2[2018 Löfven transition]:::b
@@ -2406,8 +2406,8 @@ <h2 id="rm-cycle-parallels-diagram">Cycle parallels diagram<a class="" aria-hidd
   classDef c fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#ffffff
   style H4 stroke-width:3px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-implementation-feasibility">Implementation Feasibility<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-feasibility"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-implementation-matrix">Implementation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-matrix"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-implementation-matrix">Implementation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-implementation-matrix"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2477,7 +2477,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-implementation-matrix">Implementation matrix<a class="" aria-hidden="
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Owner</th><th>Critical-path constraint</th><th>Window to visible effect</th><th>Feasibility</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>Polismyndigheten + Domstolsverket</td><td>Tillståndshanterings­kapacitet</td><td>9–18 months</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH; depends on HD01JuU31 closure [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>Polismyndigheten</td><td>RiR 2026:6 9 öppna rekommendationer</td><td>24+ months</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM; second audit cycle expected ~2029 [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>Försäkringskassan + kommuner</td><td>Anhörigstrategi finansiering (HD03100 saknar post)</td><td>12–18 months</td><td>MEDIUM; R-1 binding [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25]</td></tr><tr><td>HD01CU24</td><td>Boverket + kommuner</td><td>Kommunal handläggar­kapacitet</td><td>6–12 months for permits, 18+ for påbörjade bostäder</td><td>MEDIUM; mätbart Q3 2026 [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</td></tr><tr><td>HD03100 fiscal</td><td>Treasury</td><td>Implementeringsklart Q3 2026</td><td>live</td><td>HIGH (sibling)</td></tr><tr><td>HD03240 elmarknad</td><td>Energimyndigheten + Svenska Kraftnät</td><td>Teknisk omkonfigurering</td><td>12+ months</td><td>MEDIUM (sibling)</td></tr><tr><td>UFöU3 NATO eFP</td><td>FM</td><td>Förbandsutbyggnad 1200 trupp</td><td>6–9 months</td><td>HIGH (sibling)</td></tr><tr><td>HD01FiU48 fuel</td><td>Treasury (live)</td><td>Implementerat 2026-05-01</td><td>live</td><td>HIGH</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama">Capacity-bottleneck panorama<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama">Capacity-bottleneck panorama<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama"></a></h3>
 <pre class="mermaid">flowchart TD
   T[Legislation committed]:::a --> P[Polismyndigheten]:::b
   T --> F[Försäkringskassan + kommuner]:::b
@@ -2493,7 +2493,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-capacity-bottleneck-panorama">Capacity-bottleneck panorama<a class=""
   classDef y fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
   style P1 stroke-width:2px
   style F1 stroke-width:2px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-forward-implementation-triggers">Forward implementation triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-implementation-triggers"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-forward-implementation-triggers">Forward implementation triggers<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-forward-implementation-triggers"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>HD01JuU10 vapenregister IT-modernisering: status report expected Q3 2026 from Polismyndigheten.</li>
 <li>HD01SoU25 anhörigstrategi national director: appointment expected 2026-06-30.</li>
@@ -2502,35 +2502,35 @@ <h2 id="rm-forward-implementation-triggers">Forward implementation triggers<a cl
 </ul>
 <p>[riksdagen.se HD01JuU31] [riksdagen.se HD01JuU10] [riksdagen.se HD01SoU25] [riksdagen.se HD01CU24]</p>
 <h2 id="rm-devils-advocate">Devil's Advocate<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-devils-advocate"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: MEDIUM (B2)
 <strong>Method</strong>: ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses) + structured red-team</p>
-<h2 id="rm-mainline-finding-under-stress">Mainline finding under stress<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-finding-under-stress"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mainline-finding-under-stress">Mainline finding under stress<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-finding-under-stress"></a></h3>
 <blockquote>
 <p><em>Tidö coalition has completed its 2025/26 portfolio; implementation is the binding risk; opposition has tactical capture without legislative reversals.</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>The remainder of this brief assumes this finding is <strong>wrong</strong> and tests three competing hypotheses.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery">Hypothesis H1: The April-24 batch is <em>electoral theatre</em>, not delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery">Hypothesis H1: The April-24 batch is <em>electoral theatre</em>, not delivery<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h1-the-april-24-batch-is-electoral-theatre-not-delivery"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24 are scheduled for committee but not finalised in chamber. The "delivered portfolio" thesis is therefore premature; April-24 is closer to <em>commitments</em> than <em>outcomes</em>.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: Three of four (JuU10, SoU25, CU24) are pre-vote; final chamber vote is May. RiR 2026:6 (HD01JuU31) is <em>information</em>, not legislation [riksdagen.se HD01JuU31].</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: Confidence-coalition committee output has converted to chamber assent at >97% rate in 2025/26; HD01FiU48 vote pattern (M+SD+S+KD) shows even opposition support was extractable.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Mainline is <strong>structurally correct, terminologically loose</strong>. Replace "delivered" with "committed and structurally locked-in" in formal claims.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable">Hypothesis H2: SD discipline is <em>strategic patience</em>, not durable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable">Hypothesis H2: SD discipline is <em>strategic patience</em>, not durable<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h2-sd-discipline-is-strategic-patience-not-durable"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: SD's zero-counter-motion streak is calculated short-term restraint. Once campaigning begins (≈2026-06-15), SD will publicly differentiate from M on migration/healthcare to mobilise its base, ending the discipline streak.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: 2018 and 2022 cycles both showed SD pivot in final 12 weeks; HD01SoU17 R15 already demonstrated SD-KD healthcare divergence (sibling 2026-04-23).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: 2025/26 is a <em>governing</em> SD cycle; party communication discipline appears institutional, not tactical. No off-script statements observed in 30-day window.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Mainline confidence on SD discipline should drop from VERY HIGH to <strong>HIGH</strong> for the 2026-06-15 → 2026-09-13 window. Add explicit indicator (T-1).</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd">Hypothesis H3: HD10448 disinformation frame is a Trojan attack on SD<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd">Hypothesis H3: HD10448 disinformation frame is a Trojan attack on SD<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h3-hd10448-disinformation-frame-is-a-trojan-attack-on-sd"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: MP/V's HD10448 wind-power-disinformation interpellation is not a sincere policy concern but a frame designed to force SD into either <em>defending</em> anti-renewable rhetoric (alienating moderate voters) or <em>renouncing</em> it (alienating its base).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: Wind-power skepticism is correlated with SD voter clusters (SOM 2024 data). Forcing the frame onto the chamber floor is a reasonable opposition manoeuvre [riksdagen.se HD10448].</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: HD10448 names no party; it is procedurally a question to the energiminister. The disinfo frame can equally serve M's consolidation messaging.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Plausible but not actionable. Track post-reply media uptake for confirmation.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk">Hypothesis H4: Implementation pivot is the <em>opposition's</em> opportunity, not a coalition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk">Hypothesis H4: Implementation pivot is the <em>opposition's</em> opportunity, not a coalition risk<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-hypothesis-h4-implementation-pivot-is-the-oppositions-opportunity-not-a-coalition-risk"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Claim</strong>: HD01JuU31 RiR 2026:6 hands the opposition a Polismyndigheten capacity stick that they can use through the entire campaign without ever proposing legislation. Tidö's "delivery" claim becomes a liability if implementation falters.</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence for</strong>: RiR 2026:6 contains 9 open recommendations; failure to close any becomes attack material; sibling intel shows S has already begun this framing on HD10447 (sjuklön).</p>
 <p><strong>Evidence against</strong>: Voters historically attribute implementation failures to agencies, not parties; M can deflect to Polismyndigheten leadership.</p>
 <p><strong>Verdict</strong>: Real risk. Strengthens R-2 in risk register; ought to be cross-referenced.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-structured-red-team-summary">Structured red-team summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-red-team-summary"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-structured-red-team-summary">Structured red-team summary<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-structured-red-team-summary"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2562,14 +2562,14 @@ <h2 id="rm-structured-red-team-summary">Structured red-team summary<a class="" a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Plausibility</th><th>Mainline correction needed?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H1 — theatre vs delivery</td><td>MEDIUM</td><td>Yes — terminology</td></tr><tr><td>H2 — SD strategic patience</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Yes — confidence band</td></tr><tr><td>H3 — Trojan disinfo frame</td><td>LOW-MEDIUM</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>H4 — opposition opportunity</td><td>MEDIUM-HIGH</td><td>Yes — risk emphasis</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections">Mainline carries forward, with two corrections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections">Mainline carries forward, with two corrections<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-mainline-carries-forward-with-two-corrections"></a></h3>
 <ol>
 <li>Reword "delivered" → "committed and structurally locked-in" (H1).</li>
 <li>Drop SD-discipline confidence VERY HIGH → HIGH for June–September (H2).</li>
 </ol>
 <h2 id="rm-classification-results">Classification Results<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-classification-results"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-dimension classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-dimension classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-7-dimension-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2616,7 +2616,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-7-dimension-classification">7-dimension classification<a class="" ari
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Value</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Type</td><td>Tier-C monthly aggregation</td><td>this brief</td></tr><tr><td>Domain (primary)</td><td>Multi-domain — fiscal + energy + criminal-justice + welfare + foreign</td><td>HD03100/HD03240/HD01JuU10/HD01SoU25/UFöU3</td></tr><tr><td>Salience</td><td>VERY HIGH</td><td>8 primary docs incl. 4 committee closures + 1 supermajoritet sibling</td></tr><tr><td>Window</td><td>30 days (2026-03-26 → 2026-04-25)</td><td>manifest</td></tr><tr><td>Audience</td><td>Decision-makers (analysts, communicators, investors), pre-election</td><td>brief frame</td></tr><tr><td>Sensitivity</td><td>PUBLIC</td><td>open-source riksdagen.se data only</td></tr><tr><td>Confidence ceiling</td><td>A1 (structural) / B2 (forward)</td><td>per Admiralty</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-document-level-classification">Document-level classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-level-classification"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-document-level-classification">Document-level classification<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-document-level-classification"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2703,10 +2703,10 @@ <h2 id="rm-document-level-classification">Document-level classification<a class=
   classDef r fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#ff006e,color:#ffffff
   style V stroke-width:2px</pre>
 <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-map">Cross-Reference Map<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-map"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Mode</strong>: Tier-C aggregation — siblings ingested per <code>ext/tier-c-aggregation.md</code></p>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested">Sibling synthesis files ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested">Sibling synthesis files ingested<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested"></a></h3>
 <p>The following sibling folders matching <code>analysis/daily/&#x3C;YYYY-MM-DD>/&#x3C;type></code> were read into Pass 1 to establish the 30-day longitudinal picture and carry forward open PIRs:</p>
 
 
@@ -2779,7 +2779,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-sibling-synthesis-files-ingested">Sibling synthesis files ingested<a
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Sibling path</th><th>Key dok_ids</th><th>Used for</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03100, HD03240, HD03238, HD03239</td><td>Mid-window legislative climax</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01CU25, HD01SfU18, HD01FiU48</td><td>April-22 committee batch</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-22/realtime-2338/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01FiU48 supermajoritet</td><td>Late-night vote evidence</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/</code> (full set)</td><td>HD01FiU48, HD03100, UFöU3, HD03240, HD03238</td><td>Prior-month baseline; PIRs carried</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01SoU16, HD01SoU17</td><td>Healthcare wedge baseline</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/month-ahead/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01FiU48 forward indicators</td><td>Month-ahead PIR alignment</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/evening-analysis/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03253, HD03252, HD10447, HD01CU25</td><td>Day-before integration</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/committeeReports/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD01CU25, HD01SfU23, HD01FiU23</td><td>Same-day committee siblings</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/propositions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03252, HD03253, HD03256, HD03104</td><td>Government-side props</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD10447 + 15 others</td><td>Opposition wedge taxonomy</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-24/motions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD024082, HD024096</td><td>Counter-motion choreography</td></tr><tr><td><code>analysis/daily/2026-04-13/propositions/synthesis-summary.md</code></td><td>HD03100, HD0399, HD03240</td><td>Spring fiscal/energy origin</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings">Cross-reference matrix (this window vs siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings">Cross-reference matrix (this window vs siblings)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2845,27 +2845,27 @@ <h2 id="rm-cross-reference-matrix-this-window-vs-siblings">Cross-reference matri
   classDef c fill:#0a0e27,stroke:#ffbe0b,color:#ffbe0b
   classDef d fill:#1a1e3d,stroke:#00d9ff,color:#ffffff
   style M25 stroke-width:3px</pre>
-<h2 id="rm-continuity-of-analytic-line">Continuity of analytic line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-of-analytic-line"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-continuity-of-analytic-line">Continuity of analytic line<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-continuity-of-analytic-line"></a></h3>
 <p>This monthly review extends <code>analysis/daily/2026-04-23/monthly-review/</code> by 2 calendar days and integrates the 2026-04-24 closure batch. The dominant analytic claim — <em>the Tidö coalition has completed its declared 2025/26 portfolio with implementation now the binding risk</em> — is <strong>strengthened</strong> by HD01JuU10/JuU31/SoU25/CU24 evidence and <strong>unaltered</strong> in direction.</p>
 <h2 id="rm-methodology-reflection--limitations">Methodology Reflection &#x26; Limitations<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-reflection--limitations"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></em></p>
+
 <p><strong>Author</strong>: James Pether Sörling | <strong>Confidence</strong>: HIGH (A1)
 <strong>Standards reference</strong>: ICD 203 (Analytic Standards), Heuer &#x26; Pherson Structured Analytic Techniques</p>
-<h2 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration">(a) Objectivity / independence of political consideration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-icd-203-audit">ICD 203 audit<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-icd-203-audit"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration">(a) Objectivity / independence of political consideration<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-a-objectivity--independence-of-political-consideration"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Analyst attestation: no advisory, employment, or financial relationship with any Riksdag party, ministry, or affiliated body in the past 24 months. Source diet (riksdagen.se primary documents + sibling self-references) eliminates source-side political bias.</p>
 <p>⚠️ Residual concern: confirmation bias toward Tidö-delivery thesis given prior monthly review's same conclusion. Mitigation: explicit devils-advocate.md with four competing hypotheses; H1/H2 corrections accepted into mainline.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments">(b) Clear distinction between facts, assumptions, and judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments">(b) Clear distinction between facts, assumptions, and judgments<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-b-clear-distinction-between-facts-assumptions-and-judgments"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Each KJ explicitly labelled with confidence band; PIRs separated from KJs; carried-forward PIRs are explicitly tagged as such.</p>
 <p>⚠️ Forward-poll claims (PIR-A) rely on single-source Demoskop projection — flagged as MEDIUM confidence rather than HIGH; assumption of 4–6 week SOM-lag is methodological assumption, not fact.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-c-wep-language">(c) WEP language<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-wep-language"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-c-wep-language">(c) WEP language<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-c-wep-language"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Used "highly likely / likely / possible / unlikely" mapped to numeric probability ranges per Kent Scale; confidence labels (VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / VERY LOW) used consistently.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses">(d) Stress-testing via competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses">(d) Stress-testing via competing hypotheses<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-d-stress-testing-via-competing-hypotheses"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ Devils-advocate.md applies ACH against 4 hypotheses; H1 (theatre vs delivery) and H2 (SD discipline duration) accepted as mainline corrections.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-e-source-citation">(e) Source citation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-e-source-citation"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-e-source-citation">(e) Source citation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-e-source-citation"></a></h4>
 <p>✅ All claims trace to either (i) primary <code>dok_id</code> (HD01CU24, HD01JuU10, HD01JuU31, HD01SoU25, HD10448, HD11747, HD11748, HD11749), (ii) sibling synthesis files, or (iii) named institutional sources (RiR 2026:6, riksdagen.se).</p>
 <p>⚠️ One claim ("Demoskop 4–6 week SOM-lag") cites general methodology rather than specific report; weakest link in source chain.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-ach-worksheet-status">ACH worksheet status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-worksheet-status"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-ach-worksheet-status">ACH worksheet status<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-ach-worksheet-status"></a></h3>
 
 
 
@@ -2902,30 +2902,30 @@ <h2 id="rm-ach-worksheet-status">ACH worksheet status<a class="" aria-hidden="tr
 
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>Hypothesis</th><th>Status</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Mainline (delivery + impl pivot)</td><td>retained, terminology corrected</td><td>adopted</td></tr><tr><td>H1 — theatre, not delivery</td><td>partially accepted</td><td>reword "delivered" → "committed and structurally locked-in"</td></tr><tr><td>H2 — SD strategic patience</td><td>partially accepted</td><td>downgrade SD-discipline confidence June+</td></tr><tr><td>H3 — Trojan disinfo frame</td><td>rejected (insufficient evidence)</td><td>track post-reply media</td></tr><tr><td>H4 — opposition opportunity</td><td>accepted</td><td>strengthens R-2</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
-<h2 id="rm-methodology-improvements">Methodology Improvements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements"></a></h2>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly">Improvement 1: Quantify SOM-lag explicitly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly"></a></h3>
+<h3 id="rm-methodology-improvements">Methodology Improvements<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-methodology-improvements"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly">Improvement 1: Quantify SOM-lag explicitly<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-1-quantify-som-lag-explicitly"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: Vague "4–6 week SOM-lag" reference. <strong>Action</strong>: Codify in <code>analysis/methodologies/</code> a calibrated SOM-Demoskop transmission table with citations. <strong>Owner</strong>: data-pipeline-specialist. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-05-15.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard">Improvement 2: Add Polismyndigheten capacity dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard">Improvement 2: Add Polismyndigheten capacity dashboard<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-2-add-polismyndigheten-capacity-dashboard"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: HD01JuU31 implementation tracking is currently narrative-only. <strong>Action</strong>: Build a recurring dashboard on (a) RiR 2026:6 recommendation closure rate, (b) Polismyndigheten Q-on-Q personnel changes, (c) Brå crime statistics. <strong>Owner</strong>: intelligence-operative + data-visualization-specialist. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-06-01.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark">Improvement 3: Counter-motion-rate baseline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark">Improvement 3: Counter-motion-rate baseline benchmark<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-3-counter-motion-rate-baseline-benchmark"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: SD's zero-counter-motion claim relies on sibling synthesis files; lacks Nordic-wide benchmark. <strong>Action</strong>: Build comparator dataset for Denmark/Norway/Finland confidence-coalition counter-motion rates 2018–2025. <strong>Owner</strong>: comparative-international skills set. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-06-30.</p>
-<h3 id="rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection">Improvement 4: Earlier wedge-architecture detection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection"></a></h3>
+<h4 id="rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection">Improvement 4: Earlier wedge-architecture detection<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-improvement-4-earlier-wedge-architecture-detection"></a></h4>
 <p><strong>Issue</strong>: HD11747/11748/11749 wedge taxonomy was identified <em>after</em> documents appeared rather than predicted. <strong>Action</strong>: Forward-indicators.md template should pre-register wedge categories so detection is faster. <strong>Owner</strong>: news-journalist + analyst-of-record. <strong>Target</strong>: 2026-05-08.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle">What worked well this cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle">What worked well this cycle<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-worked-well-this-cycle"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>✅ Tier-C sibling-folder ingestion gave robust 30-day picture from only 8 fresh primaries.</li>
 <li>✅ DIW ranking remained stable across sensitivity perturbation (top-3 unchanged).</li>
 <li>✅ Carried-forward PIR ledger from 2026-04-23 closed cleanly with vote evidence.</li>
 </ul>
-<h2 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-what-didnt">What didn't<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-what-didnt"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>⚠️ HD03100 fiscal text not directly read this cycle (sibling-only); should refresh quarterly.</li>
 <li>⚠️ Lookback fallback (1-day) means "monthly" is arithmetic only on siblings; document this explicitly in manifest.</li>
 <li>⚠️ One MCP enrichment retry needed.</li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="rm-data-download-manifest">Data Download Manifest<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-data-download-manifest"></a></h2>
-<p><em>Source: <a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></em></p>
-<h2 id="rm-documents-in-this-aggregation">Documents in this aggregation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-in-this-aggregation"></a></h2>
+
+<h3 id="rm-documents-in-this-aggregation">Documents in this aggregation<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-documents-in-this-aggregation"></a></h3>
 <p>This monthly review aggregates 8 primary documents from the 2026-04-24 chamber day, supplemented by sibling-day analyses (2026-04-23 monthly-review and the drivmedelsskattepaketet carry-narrative covered in cross-reference-map.md).</p>
 
 
@@ -2988,13 +2988,47 @@ <h2 id="rm-documents-in-this-aggregation">Documents in this aggregation<a class=
 
 <div class="rm-table-wrap"><table><thead><tr><th>dok_id</th><th>Type</th><th>Title (short)</th><th>Source</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HD01CU24</td><td>bet (CU)</td><td>Byggprocessen — förenklad handläggning</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU10</td><td>bet (JuU)</td><td>Ny vapenlag</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD01JuU31</td><td>bet (JuU)</td><td>RiR uppföljning Polisreformen</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD01SoU25</td><td>bet (SoU)</td><td>Äldreomsorg + anhörigstrategi</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD10448</td><td>ip</td><td>Desinformation om vindkraft</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD11747</td><td>fr</td><td>Lönestöd kontra arbetsmiljö</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD11748</td><td>fr</td><td>Burunditolken Sahabo / mänskliga rättigheter</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr><tr><td>HD11749</td><td>fr</td><td>Utbildning för barn i förvar</td><td>data.riksdagen.se</td></tr></tbody></table></div>
 <p>Source JSON copies stored in <code>documents/</code>. Per-document analyses in <code>documents/&#x3C;DOK_ID>-analysis.md</code>.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated">Sibling-month context (cross-reference only — not aggregated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated">Sibling-month context (cross-reference only — not aggregated)<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-sibling-month-context-cross-reference-only--not-aggregated"></a></h3>
 <p>The <code>cross-reference-map.md</code> cites prior siblings: 2026-04-23 monthly-review, 2026-04-22 propositions (vårpropositionen), and 2026-04-21 committee-reports (drivmedelsskattepaketet). These are referenced for narrative continuity, not re-aggregated here. Refer to those sibling folders for primary dok_id analyses.</p>
-<h2 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h2>
+<h3 id="rm-provenance">Provenance<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-provenance"></a></h3>
 <ul>
 <li>API: <code>https://data.riksdagen.se</code> open data</li>
 <li>Fetched: 2026-04-25 by <code>scripts/download-parliamentary-data.ts</code> with date=2026-04-24 lookback fallback</li>
 <li>Manifest at <code>manifest.json</code></li>
+</ul>
+<h2 id="rm-article-sources">Article Sources<a class="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#rm-article-sources"></a></h2>
+<p>Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:</p>
+<ul>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/executive-brief.md"><code>executive-brief.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/synthesis-summary.md"><code>synthesis-summary.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/intelligence-assessment.md"><code>intelligence-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/significance-scoring.md"><code>significance-scoring.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/media-framing-analysis.md"><code>media-framing-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/stakeholder-perspectives.md"><code>stakeholder-perspectives.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/forward-indicators.md"><code>forward-indicators.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/scenario-analysis.md"><code>scenario-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/risk-assessment.md"><code>risk-assessment.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/swot-analysis.md"><code>swot-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/threat-analysis.md"><code>threat-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01CU24-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU10-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01JuU31-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD01SoU25-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD10448-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD10448-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11747-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11747-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11748-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11748-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/documents/HD11749-analysis.md"><code>documents/HD11749-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/election-2026-analysis.md"><code>election-2026-analysis.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/coalition-mathematics.md"><code>coalition-mathematics.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/voter-segmentation.md"><code>voter-segmentation.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/comparative-international.md"><code>comparative-international.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/historical-parallels.md"><code>historical-parallels.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/implementation-feasibility.md"><code>implementation-feasibility.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/devils-advocate.md"><code>devils-advocate.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/classification-results.md"><code>classification-results.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/cross-reference-map.md"><code>cross-reference-map.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/methodology-reflection.md"><code>methodology-reflection.md</code></a></li>
+<li><a href="https://github.com/Hack23/riksdagsmonitor/blob/main/analysis/daily/2026-04-25/monthly-review/data-download-manifest.md"><code>data-download-manifest.md</code></a></li>
 </ul>
         </div>
 
@@ -3056,7 +3090,7 @@ <h2 id="rm-ft-about" class="rm-footer-heading">Riksdagsmonitor</h2>
             · Built by
             <a href="https://www.hack23.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hack23 AB</a>
           </p>
-          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T13:40:43.147Z">2026-04-25 13:40 UTC</time></small></p>
+          <p class="rm-footer-updated"><small>Last updated: <time datetime="2026-04-25T15:52:35.167Z">2026-04-25 15:52 UTC</time></small></p>
         </section>
         <section class="rm-footer-col rm-footer-navigate" aria-labelledby="rm-ft-nav">
           <h2 id="rm-ft-nav" class="rm-footer-heading">Ytterligare resurser</h2>
diff --git a/package-lock.json b/package-lock.json
index 6aa5d497f1..71508d1f49 100644
--- a/package-lock.json
+++ b/package-lock.json
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
         "chartjs-plugin-annotation": "3.1.0",
         "d3": "7.9.0",
         "eslint": "10.2.1",
+        "github-slugger": "^2.0.0",
         "globals": "17.5.0",
         "gray-matter": "^4.0.3",
         "happy-dom": "20.9.0",
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
         "json-schema-to-typescript": "15.0.4",
         "jszip": "3.10.1",
         "knip": "6.6.3",
+        "mermaid": "11.4.1",
         "papaparse": "5.5.3",
         "playwright": "1.59.1",
         "rehype-autolink-headings": "^7.1.0",
@@ -82,6 +84,30 @@
         }
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@antfu/install-pkg": {
+      "version": "1.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@antfu/install-pkg/-/install-pkg-1.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-MGQsmw10ZyI+EJo45CdSER4zEb+p31LpDAFp2Z3gkSd1yqVZGi0Ebx++YTEMonJy4oChEMLsxZ64j8FH6sSqtQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "package-manager-detector": "^1.3.0",
+        "tinyexec": "^1.0.1"
+      },
+      "funding": {
+        "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/antfu"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@antfu/utils": {
+      "version": "8.1.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@antfu/utils/-/utils-8.1.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Mex9nXf9vR6AhcXmMrlz/HVgYYZpVGJ6YlPgwl7UnaFpnshXs6EK/oa5Gpf3CzENMjkvEx2tQtntGnb7UtSTOQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "funding": {
+        "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/antfu"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/@apidevtools/json-schema-ref-parser": {
       "version": "11.9.3",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@apidevtools/json-schema-ref-parser/-/json-schema-ref-parser-11.9.3.tgz",
@@ -160,6 +186,71 @@
         "node": ">=18"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@braintree/sanitize-url": {
+      "version": "7.1.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@braintree/sanitize-url/-/sanitize-url-7.1.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-jigsZK+sMF/cuiB7sERuo9V7N9jx+dhmHHnQyDSVdpZwVutaBu7WvNYqMDLSgFgfB30n452TP3vjDAvFC973mA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@chevrotain/cst-dts-gen": {
+      "version": "11.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@chevrotain/cst-dts-gen/-/cst-dts-gen-11.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-BvIKpRLeS/8UbfxXxgC33xOumsacaeCKAjAeLyOn7Pcp95HiRbrpl14S+9vaZLolnbssPIUuiUd8IvgkRyt6NQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "Apache-2.0",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@chevrotain/gast": "11.0.3",
+        "@chevrotain/types": "11.0.3",
+        "lodash-es": "4.17.21"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@chevrotain/cst-dts-gen/node_modules/lodash-es": {
+      "version": "4.17.21",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash-es/-/lodash-es-4.17.21.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-mKnC+QJ9pWVzv+C4/U3rRsHapFfHvQFoFB92e52xeyGMcX6/OlIl78je1u8vePzYZSkkogMPJ2yjxxsb89cxyw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@chevrotain/gast": {
+      "version": "11.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@chevrotain/gast/-/gast-11.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-+qNfcoNk70PyS/uxmj3li5NiECO+2YKZZQMbmjTqRI3Qchu8Hig/Q9vgkHpI3alNjr7M+a2St5pw5w5F6NL5/Q==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "Apache-2.0",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@chevrotain/types": "11.0.3",
+        "lodash-es": "4.17.21"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@chevrotain/gast/node_modules/lodash-es": {
+      "version": "4.17.21",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash-es/-/lodash-es-4.17.21.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-mKnC+QJ9pWVzv+C4/U3rRsHapFfHvQFoFB92e52xeyGMcX6/OlIl78je1u8vePzYZSkkogMPJ2yjxxsb89cxyw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@chevrotain/regexp-to-ast": {
+      "version": "11.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@chevrotain/regexp-to-ast/-/regexp-to-ast-11.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-1fMHaBZxLFvWI067AVbGJav1eRY7N8DDvYCTwGBiE/ytKBgP8azTdgyrKyWZ9Mfh09eHWb5PgTSO8wi7U824RA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "Apache-2.0"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@chevrotain/types": {
+      "version": "11.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@chevrotain/types/-/types-11.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-gsiM3G8b58kZC2HaWR50gu6Y1440cHiJ+i3JUvcp/35JchYejb2+5MVeJK0iKThYpAa/P2PYFV4hoi44HD+aHQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "Apache-2.0"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@chevrotain/utils": {
+      "version": "11.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@chevrotain/utils/-/utils-11.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-YslZMgtJUyuMbZ+aKvfF3x1f5liK4mWNxghFRv7jqRR9C3R3fAOGTTKvxXDa2Y1s9zSbcpuO0cAxDYsc9SrXoQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "Apache-2.0"
+    },
     "node_modules/@cypress/request": {
       "version": "3.0.10",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@cypress/request/-/request-3.0.10.tgz",
@@ -948,6 +1039,43 @@
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/nzakas"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@iconify/types": {
+      "version": "2.0.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@iconify/types/-/types-2.0.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-+wluvCrRhXrhyOmRDJ3q8mux9JkKy5SJ/v8ol2tu4FVjyYvtEzkc/3pK15ET6RKg4b4w4BmTk1+gsCUhf21Ykg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@iconify/utils": {
+      "version": "2.3.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@iconify/utils/-/utils-2.3.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-GmQ78prtwYW6EtzXRU1rY+KwOKfz32PD7iJh6Iyqw68GiKuoZ2A6pRtzWONz5VQJbp50mEjXh/7NkumtrAgRKA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@antfu/install-pkg": "^1.0.0",
+        "@antfu/utils": "^8.1.0",
+        "@iconify/types": "^2.0.0",
+        "debug": "^4.4.0",
+        "globals": "^15.14.0",
+        "kolorist": "^1.8.0",
+        "local-pkg": "^1.0.0",
+        "mlly": "^1.7.4"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@iconify/utils/node_modules/globals": {
+      "version": "15.15.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/globals/-/globals-15.15.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-7ACyT3wmyp3I61S4fG682L0VA2RGD9otkqGJIwNUMF1SWUombIIk+af1unuDYgMm082aHYwD+mzJvv9Iu8dsgg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=18"
+      },
+      "funding": {
+        "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/@jridgewell/resolve-uri": {
       "version": "3.1.2",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@jridgewell/resolve-uri/-/resolve-uri-3.1.2.tgz",
@@ -990,6 +1118,16 @@
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT"
     },
+    "node_modules/@mermaid-js/parser": {
+      "version": "0.3.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@mermaid-js/parser/-/parser-0.3.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-HsvL6zgE5sUPGgkIDlmAWR1HTNHz2Iy11BAWPTa4Jjabkpguy4Ze2gzfLrg6pdRuBvFwgUYyxiaNqZwrEEXepA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "langium": "3.0.0"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": {
       "version": "1.27.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/-/sdk-1.27.1.tgz",
@@ -2468,6 +2606,14 @@
       "license": "MIT",
       "optional": true
     },
+    "node_modules/@types/trusted-types": {
+      "version": "2.0.7",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/trusted-types/-/trusted-types-2.0.7.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-ScaPdn1dQczgbl0QFTeTOmVHFULt394XJgOQNoyVhZ6r2vLnMLJfBPd53SB52T/3G36VI1/g2MZaX0cwDuXsfw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "optional": true
+    },
     "node_modules/@types/unist": {
       "version": "3.0.3",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/unist/-/unist-3.0.3.tgz",
@@ -3564,6 +3710,41 @@
         "node": ">= 0.8.0"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/chevrotain": {
+      "version": "11.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chevrotain/-/chevrotain-11.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-ci2iJH6LeIkvP9eJW6gpueU8cnZhv85ELY8w8WiFtNjMHA5ad6pQLaJo9mEly/9qUyCpvqX8/POVUTf18/HFdw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "Apache-2.0",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@chevrotain/cst-dts-gen": "11.0.3",
+        "@chevrotain/gast": "11.0.3",
+        "@chevrotain/regexp-to-ast": "11.0.3",
+        "@chevrotain/types": "11.0.3",
+        "@chevrotain/utils": "11.0.3",
+        "lodash-es": "4.17.21"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/chevrotain-allstar": {
+      "version": "0.3.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chevrotain-allstar/-/chevrotain-allstar-0.3.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-b7g+y9A0v4mxCW1qUhf3BSVPg+/NvGErk/dOkrDaHA0nQIQGAtrOjlX//9OQtRlSCy+x9rfB5N8yC71lH1nvMw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "lodash-es": "^4.17.21"
+      },
+      "peerDependencies": {
+        "chevrotain": "^11.0.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/chevrotain/node_modules/lodash-es": {
+      "version": "4.17.21",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash-es/-/lodash-es-4.17.21.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-mKnC+QJ9pWVzv+C4/U3rRsHapFfHvQFoFB92e52xeyGMcX6/OlIl78je1u8vePzYZSkkogMPJ2yjxxsb89cxyw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/ci-info": {
       "version": "4.4.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ci-info/-/ci-info-4.4.0.tgz",
@@ -3717,6 +3898,13 @@
         "node": ">=4.0.0"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/confbox": {
+      "version": "0.2.4",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/confbox/-/confbox-0.2.4.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-ysOGlgTFbN2/Y6Cg3Iye8YKulHw+R2fNXHrgSmXISQdMnomY6eNDprVdW9R5xBguEqI954+S6709UyiO7B+6OQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/content-disposition": {
       "version": "1.0.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/content-disposition/-/content-disposition-1.0.1.tgz",
@@ -3793,6 +3981,16 @@
         "url": "https://opencollective.com/express"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/cose-base": {
+      "version": "1.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cose-base/-/cose-base-1.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-s9whTXInMSgAp/NVXVNuVxVKzGH2qck3aQlVHxDCdAEPgtMKwc4Wq6/QKhgdEdgbLSi9rBTAcPoRa6JpiG4ksg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "layout-base": "^1.0.0"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/cross-spawn": {
       "version": "7.0.6",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cross-spawn/-/cross-spawn-7.0.6.tgz",
@@ -3874,6 +4072,59 @@
       "license": "0BSD",
       "optional": true
     },
+    "node_modules/cytoscape": {
+      "version": "3.33.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cytoscape/-/cytoscape-3.33.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-sj4HXd3DokGhzZAdjDejGvTPLqlt84vNFN8m7bGsOzDY5DyVcxIb2ejIXat2Iy7HxWhdT/N1oKyheJ5YdpsGuw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=0.10"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/cytoscape-cose-bilkent": {
+      "version": "4.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cytoscape-cose-bilkent/-/cytoscape-cose-bilkent-4.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-wgQlVIUJF13Quxiv5e1gstZ08rnZj2XaLHGoFMYXz7SkNfCDOOteKBE6SYRfA9WxxI/iBc3ajfDoc6hb/MRAHQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "cose-base": "^1.0.0"
+      },
+      "peerDependencies": {
+        "cytoscape": "^3.2.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/cytoscape-fcose": {
+      "version": "2.2.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cytoscape-fcose/-/cytoscape-fcose-2.2.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-ki1/VuRIHFCzxWNrsshHYPs6L7TvLu3DL+TyIGEsRcvVERmxokbf5Gdk7mFxZnTdiGtnA4cfSmjZJMviqSuZrQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "cose-base": "^2.2.0"
+      },
+      "peerDependencies": {
+        "cytoscape": "^3.2.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/cytoscape-fcose/node_modules/cose-base": {
+      "version": "2.2.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cose-base/-/cose-base-2.2.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-AzlgcsCbUMymkADOJtQm3wO9S3ltPfYOFD5033keQn9NJzIbtnZj+UdBJe7DYml/8TdbtHJW3j58SOnKhWY/5g==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "layout-base": "^2.0.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/cytoscape-fcose/node_modules/layout-base": {
+      "version": "2.0.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/layout-base/-/layout-base-2.0.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-dp3s92+uNI1hWIpPGH3jK2kxE2lMjdXdr+DH8ynZHpd6PUlH6x6cbuXnoMmiNumznqaNO31xu9e79F0uuZ0JFg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/d3": {
       "version": "7.9.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d3/-/d3-7.9.0.tgz",
@@ -4189,6 +4440,51 @@
         "node": ">=12"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/d3-sankey": {
+      "version": "0.12.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d3-sankey/-/d3-sankey-0.12.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-nQhsBRmM19Ax5xEIPLMY9ZmJ/cDvd1BG3UVvt5h3WRxKg5zGRbvnteTyWAbzeSvlh3tW7ZEmq4VwR5mB3tutmQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "BSD-3-Clause",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "d3-array": "1 - 2",
+        "d3-shape": "^1.2.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/d3-sankey/node_modules/d3-array": {
+      "version": "2.12.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d3-array/-/d3-array-2.12.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-B0ErZK/66mHtEsR1TkPEEkwdy+WDesimkM5gpZr5Dsg54BiTA5RXtYW5qTLIAcekaS9xfZrzBLF/OAkB3Qn1YQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "BSD-3-Clause",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "internmap": "^1.0.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/d3-sankey/node_modules/d3-path": {
+      "version": "1.0.9",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d3-path/-/d3-path-1.0.9.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-VLaYcn81dtHVTjEHd8B+pbe9yHWpXKZUC87PzoFmsFrJqgFwDe/qxfp5MlfsfM1V5E/iVt0MmEbWQ7FVIXh/bg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "BSD-3-Clause"
+    },
+    "node_modules/d3-sankey/node_modules/d3-shape": {
+      "version": "1.3.7",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d3-shape/-/d3-shape-1.3.7.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-EUkvKjqPFUAZyOlhY5gzCxCeI0Aep04LwIRpsZ/mLFelJiUfnK56jo5JMDSE7yyP2kLSb6LtF+S5chMk7uqPqw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "BSD-3-Clause",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "d3-path": "1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/d3-sankey/node_modules/internmap": {
+      "version": "1.0.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/internmap/-/internmap-1.0.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-lDB5YccMydFBtasVtxnZ3MRBHuaoE8GKsppq+EchKL2U4nK/DmEpPHNH8MZe5HkMtpSiTSOZwfN0tzYjO/lJEw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "ISC"
+    },
     "node_modules/d3-scale": {
       "version": "4.0.2",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d3-scale/-/d3-scale-4.0.2.tgz",
@@ -4316,6 +4612,17 @@
         "node": ">=12"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/dagre-d3-es": {
+      "version": "7.0.11",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/dagre-d3-es/-/dagre-d3-es-7.0.11.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-tvlJLyQf834SylNKax8Wkzco/1ias1OPw8DcUMDE7oUIoSEW25riQVuiu/0OWEFqT0cxHT3Pa9/D82Jr47IONw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "d3": "^7.9.0",
+        "lodash-es": "^4.17.21"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/dashdash": {
       "version": "1.14.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/dashdash/-/dashdash-1.14.1.tgz",
@@ -4333,8 +4640,8 @@
       "version": "1.11.19",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/dayjs/-/dayjs-1.11.19.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-t5EcLVS6QPBNqM2z8fakk/NKel+Xzshgt8FFKAn+qwlD1pzZWxh0nVCrvFK7ZDb6XucZeF9z8C7CBWTRIVApAw==",
-      "license": "MIT",
-      "optional": true
+      "devOptional": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
     },
     "node_modules/debug": {
       "version": "4.4.3",
@@ -4439,6 +4746,16 @@
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/wooorm"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/dompurify": {
+      "version": "3.4.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/dompurify/-/dompurify-3.4.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-JahakDAIg1gyOm7dlgWSDjV4n7Ip2PKR55NIT6jrMfIgLFgWo81vdr1/QGqWtFNRqXP9UV71oVePtjqS2ebnPw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "(MPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0)",
+      "optionalDependencies": {
+        "@types/trusted-types": "^2.0.7"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/dunder-proto": {
       "version": "1.0.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/dunder-proto/-/dunder-proto-1.0.1.tgz",
@@ -5021,6 +5338,13 @@
         "url": "https://opencollective.com/express"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/exsolve": {
+      "version": "1.0.8",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/exsolve/-/exsolve-1.0.8.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-LmDxfWXwcTArk8fUEnOfSZpHOJ6zOMUJKOtFLFqJLoKJetuQG874Uc7/Kki7zFLzYybmZhp1M7+98pfMqeX8yA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/extend": {
       "version": "3.0.2",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend/-/extend-3.0.2.tgz",
@@ -5584,6 +5908,13 @@
         "js-yaml": "bin/js-yaml.js"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/hachure-fill": {
+      "version": "0.5.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/hachure-fill/-/hachure-fill-0.5.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-3GKBOn+m2LX9iq+JC1064cSFprJY4jL1jCXTcpnfER5HYE2l/4EfWSGzkPa/ZDBmYI0ZOEj5VHV/eKnPGkHuOg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/happy-dom": {
       "version": "20.9.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/happy-dom/-/happy-dom-20.9.0.tgz",
@@ -6491,6 +6822,33 @@
         "setimmediate": "^1.0.5"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/katex": {
+      "version": "0.16.45",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/katex/-/katex-0.16.45.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-pQpZbdBu7wCTmQUh7ufPmLr0pFoObnGUoL/yhtwJDgmmQpbkg/0HSVti25Fu4rmd1oCR6NGWe9vqTWuWv3GcNA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "funding": [
+        "https://opencollective.com/katex",
+        "https://github.com/sponsors/katex"
+      ],
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "commander": "^8.3.0"
+      },
+      "bin": {
+        "katex": "cli.js"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/katex/node_modules/commander": {
+      "version": "8.3.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/commander/-/commander-8.3.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-OkTL9umf+He2DZkUq8f8J9of7yL6RJKI24dVITBmNfZBmri9zYZQrKkuXiKhyfPSu8tUhnVBB1iKXevvnlR4Ww==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">= 12"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/keyv": {
       "version": "4.5.4",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/keyv/-/keyv-4.5.4.tgz",
@@ -6501,6 +6859,12 @@
         "json-buffer": "3.0.1"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/khroma": {
+      "version": "2.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/khroma/-/khroma-2.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Ls993zuzfayK269Svk9hzpeGUKob/sIgZzyHYdjQoAdQetRKpOLj+k/QQQ/6Qi0Yz65mlROrfd+Ev+1+7dz9Kw==",
+      "dev": true
+    },
     "node_modules/kind-of": {
       "version": "6.0.3",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-6.0.3.tgz",
@@ -6564,6 +6928,37 @@
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/kolorist": {
+      "version": "1.8.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kolorist/-/kolorist-1.8.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Y+60/zizpJ3HRH8DCss+q95yr6145JXZo46OTpFvDZWLfRCE4qChOyk1b26nMaNpfHHgxagk9dXT5OP0Tfe+dQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/langium": {
+      "version": "3.0.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/langium/-/langium-3.0.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-+Ez9EoiByeoTu/2BXmEaZ06iPNXM6thWJp02KfBO/raSMyCJ4jw7AkWWa+zBCTm0+Tw1Fj9FOxdqSskyN5nAwg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "chevrotain": "~11.0.3",
+        "chevrotain-allstar": "~0.3.0",
+        "vscode-languageserver": "~9.0.1",
+        "vscode-languageserver-textdocument": "~1.0.11",
+        "vscode-uri": "~3.0.8"
+      },
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=16.0.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/layout-base": {
+      "version": "1.0.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/layout-base/-/layout-base-1.0.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-8h2oVEZNktL4BH2JCOI90iD1yXwL6iNW7KcCKT2QZgQJR2vbqDsldCTPRU9NifTCqHZci57XvQQ15YTu+sTYPg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/lazy-ass": {
       "version": "1.6.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lazy-ass/-/lazy-ass-1.6.0.tgz",
@@ -6897,6 +7292,24 @@
         }
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/local-pkg": {
+      "version": "1.1.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/local-pkg/-/local-pkg-1.1.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-arhlxbFRmoQHl33a0Zkle/YWlmNwoyt6QNZEIJcqNbdrsix5Lvc4HyyI3EnwxTYlZYc32EbYrQ8SzEZ7dqgg9A==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "mlly": "^1.7.4",
+        "pkg-types": "^2.3.0",
+        "quansync": "^0.2.11"
+      },
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=14"
+      },
+      "funding": {
+        "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/antfu"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/locate-path": {
       "version": "6.0.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/locate-path/-/locate-path-6.0.0.tgz",
@@ -6920,6 +7333,13 @@
       "devOptional": true,
       "license": "MIT"
     },
+    "node_modules/lodash-es": {
+      "version": "4.18.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash-es/-/lodash-es-4.18.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-J8xewKD/Gk22OZbhpOVSwcs60zhd95ESDwezOFuA3/099925PdHJ7OFHNTGtajL3AlZkykD32HykiMo+BIBI8A==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/lodash.once": {
       "version": "4.1.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.once/-/lodash.once-4.1.1.tgz",
@@ -7104,6 +7524,19 @@
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/wooorm"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/marked": {
+      "version": "13.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/marked/-/marked-13.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-rqRix3/TWzE9rIoFGIn8JmsVfhiuC8VIQ8IdX5TfzmeBucdY05/0UlzKaw0eVtpcN/OdVFpBk7CjKGo9iHJ/zA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "bin": {
+        "marked": "bin/marked.js"
+      },
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">= 18"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/math-intrinsics": {
       "version": "1.1.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/math-intrinsics/-/math-intrinsics-1.1.0.tgz",
@@ -7386,6 +7819,49 @@
       "devOptional": true,
       "license": "MIT"
     },
+    "node_modules/mermaid": {
+      "version": "11.4.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mermaid/-/mermaid-11.4.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Mb01JT/x6CKDWaxigwfZYuYmDZ6xtrNwNlidKZwkSrDaY9n90tdrJTV5Umk+wP1fZscGptmKFXHsXMDEVZ+Q6A==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@braintree/sanitize-url": "^7.0.1",
+        "@iconify/utils": "^2.1.32",
+        "@mermaid-js/parser": "^0.3.0",
+        "@types/d3": "^7.4.3",
+        "cytoscape": "^3.29.2",
+        "cytoscape-cose-bilkent": "^4.1.0",
+        "cytoscape-fcose": "^2.2.0",
+        "d3": "^7.9.0",
+        "d3-sankey": "^0.12.3",
+        "dagre-d3-es": "7.0.11",
+        "dayjs": "^1.11.10",
+        "dompurify": "^3.2.1",
+        "katex": "^0.16.9",
+        "khroma": "^2.1.0",
+        "lodash-es": "^4.17.21",
+        "marked": "^13.0.2",
+        "roughjs": "^4.6.6",
+        "stylis": "^4.3.1",
+        "ts-dedent": "^2.2.0",
+        "uuid": "^9.0.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/mermaid/node_modules/uuid": {
+      "version": "9.0.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/uuid/-/uuid-9.0.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-b+1eJOlsR9K8HJpow9Ok3fiWOWSIcIzXodvv0rQjVoOVNpWMpxf1wZNpt4y9h10odCNrqnYp1OBzRktckBe3sA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "funding": [
+        "https://github.com/sponsors/broofa",
+        "https://github.com/sponsors/ctavan"
+      ],
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "bin": {
+        "uuid": "dist/bin/uuid"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/micromark": {
       "version": "4.0.2",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/micromark/-/micromark-4.0.2.tgz",
@@ -8046,6 +8522,38 @@
         "node": ">=16 || 14 >=14.17"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/mlly": {
+      "version": "1.8.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mlly/-/mlly-1.8.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-d+ObxMQFmbt10sretNDytwt85VrbkhhUA/JBGm1MPaWJ65Cl4wOgLaB1NYvJSZ0Ef03MMEU/0xpPMXUIQ29UfA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "acorn": "^8.16.0",
+        "pathe": "^2.0.3",
+        "pkg-types": "^1.3.1",
+        "ufo": "^1.6.3"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/mlly/node_modules/confbox": {
+      "version": "0.1.8",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/confbox/-/confbox-0.1.8.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-RMtmw0iFkeR4YV+fUOSucriAQNb9g8zFR52MWCtl+cCZOFRNL6zeB395vPzFhEjjn4fMxXudmELnl/KF/WrK6w==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/mlly/node_modules/pkg-types": {
+      "version": "1.3.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pkg-types/-/pkg-types-1.3.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-/Jm5M4RvtBFVkKWRu2BLUTNP8/M2a+UwuAX+ae4770q1qVGtfjG+WTCupoZixokjmHiry8uI+dlY8KXYV5HVVQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "confbox": "^0.1.8",
+        "mlly": "^1.7.4",
+        "pathe": "^2.0.1"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/mrmime": {
       "version": "2.0.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mrmime/-/mrmime-2.0.1.tgz",
@@ -8357,6 +8865,13 @@
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/package-manager-detector": {
+      "version": "1.6.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/package-manager-detector/-/package-manager-detector-1.6.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-61A5ThoTiDG/C8s8UMZwSorAGwMJ0ERVGj2OjoW5pAalsNOg15+iQiPzrLJ4jhZ1HJzmC2PIHT2oEiH3R5fzNA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/pako": {
       "version": "1.0.11",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pako/-/pako-1.0.11.tgz",
@@ -8407,6 +8922,13 @@
         "node": ">= 0.8"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/path-data-parser": {
+      "version": "0.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-data-parser/-/path-data-parser-0.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-NOnmBpt5Y2RWbuv0LMzsayp3lVylAHLPUTut412ZA3l+C4uw4ZVkQbjShYCQ8TCpUMdPapr4YjUqLYD6v68j+w==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/path-exists": {
       "version": "4.0.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-exists/-/path-exists-4.0.0.tgz",
@@ -8516,6 +9038,18 @@
         "node": ">=16.20.0"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/pkg-types": {
+      "version": "2.3.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pkg-types/-/pkg-types-2.3.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-SIqCzDRg0s9npO5XQ3tNZioRY1uK06lA41ynBC1YmFTmnY6FjUjVt6s4LoADmwoig1qqD0oK8h1p/8mlMx8Oig==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "confbox": "^0.2.2",
+        "exsolve": "^1.0.7",
+        "pathe": "^2.0.3"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/playwright": {
       "version": "1.59.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/playwright/-/playwright-1.59.1.tgz",
@@ -8563,6 +9097,24 @@
         "node": "^8.16.0 || ^10.6.0 || >=11.0.0"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/points-on-curve": {
+      "version": "0.2.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/points-on-curve/-/points-on-curve-0.2.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-0mYKnYYe9ZcqMCWhUjItv/oHjvgEsfKvnUTg8sAtnHr3GVy7rGkXCb6d5cSyqrWqL4k81b9CPg3urd+T7aop3A==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/points-on-path": {
+      "version": "0.2.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/points-on-path/-/points-on-path-0.2.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-25ClnWWuw7JbWZcgqY/gJ4FQWadKxGWk+3kR/7kD0tCaDtPPMj7oHu2ToLaVhfpnHrZzYby2w6tUA0eOIuUg8g==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "path-data-parser": "0.1.0",
+        "points-on-curve": "0.2.0"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/postcss": {
       "version": "8.5.10",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/postcss/-/postcss-8.5.10.tgz",
@@ -8727,6 +9279,23 @@
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/quansync": {
+      "version": "0.2.11",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/quansync/-/quansync-0.2.11.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-AifT7QEbW9Nri4tAwR5M/uzpBuqfZf+zwaEM/QkzEjj7NBuFD2rBuy0K3dE+8wltbezDV7JMA0WfnCPYRSYbXA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "funding": [
+        {
+          "type": "individual",
+          "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/antfu"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "individual",
+          "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sxzz"
+        }
+      ],
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/range-parser": {
       "version": "1.2.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/range-parser/-/range-parser-1.2.1.tgz",
@@ -9039,6 +9608,19 @@
         "@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc": "1.0.0-rc.17"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/roughjs": {
+      "version": "4.6.6",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/roughjs/-/roughjs-4.6.6.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-ZUz/69+SYpFN/g/lUlo2FXcIjRkSu3nDarreVdGGndHEBJ6cXPdKguS8JGxwj5HA5xIbVKSmLgr5b3AWxtRfvQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "hachure-fill": "^0.5.2",
+        "path-data-parser": "^0.1.0",
+        "points-on-curve": "^0.2.0",
+        "points-on-path": "^0.2.1"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/router": {
       "version": "2.2.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/router/-/router-2.2.0.tgz",
@@ -9615,6 +10197,13 @@
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/stylis": {
+      "version": "4.4.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/stylis/-/stylis-4.4.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-5Z9ZpRzfuH6l/UAvCPAPUo3665Nk2wLaZU3x+TLHKVzIz33+sbJqbtrYoC3KD4/uVOr2Zp+L0LySezP9OHV9yA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/supports-color": {
       "version": "8.1.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/supports-color/-/supports-color-8.1.1.tgz",
@@ -9827,6 +10416,16 @@
         "typescript": ">=4.8.4"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/ts-dedent": {
+      "version": "2.2.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ts-dedent/-/ts-dedent-2.2.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-q5W7tVM71e2xjHZTlgfTDoPF/SmqKG5hddq9SzR49CH2hayqRKJtQ4mtRlSxKaJlR/+9rEM+mnBHf7I2/BQcpQ==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=6.10"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/tslib": {
       "version": "2.8.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/tslib/-/tslib-2.8.1.tgz",
@@ -10047,6 +10646,13 @@
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT"
     },
+    "node_modules/ufo": {
+      "version": "1.6.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ufo/-/ufo-1.6.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-yDJTmhydvl5lJzBmy/hyOAA0d+aqCBuwl818haVdYCRrWV84o7YyeVm4QlVHStqNrrJSTb6jKuFAVqAFsr+K3Q==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/unbash": {
       "version": "3.0.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/unbash/-/unbash-3.0.0.tgz",
@@ -10468,6 +11074,61 @@
         }
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/vscode-jsonrpc": {
+      "version": "8.2.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vscode-jsonrpc/-/vscode-jsonrpc-8.2.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-C+r0eKJUIfiDIfwJhria30+TYWPtuHJXHtI7J0YlOmKAo7ogxP20T0zxB7HZQIFhIyvoBPwWskjxrvAtfjyZfA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=14.0.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/vscode-languageserver": {
+      "version": "9.0.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vscode-languageserver/-/vscode-languageserver-9.0.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-woByF3PDpkHFUreUa7Hos7+pUWdeWMXRd26+ZX2A8cFx6v/JPTtd4/uN0/jB6XQHYaOlHbio03NTHCqrgG5n7g==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "vscode-languageserver-protocol": "3.17.5"
+      },
+      "bin": {
+        "installServerIntoExtension": "bin/installServerIntoExtension"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/vscode-languageserver-protocol": {
+      "version": "3.17.5",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vscode-languageserver-protocol/-/vscode-languageserver-protocol-3.17.5.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-mb1bvRJN8SVznADSGWM9u/b07H7Ecg0I3OgXDuLdn307rl/J3A9YD6/eYOssqhecL27hK1IPZAsaqh00i/Jljg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "vscode-jsonrpc": "8.2.0",
+        "vscode-languageserver-types": "3.17.5"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/vscode-languageserver-textdocument": {
+      "version": "1.0.12",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vscode-languageserver-textdocument/-/vscode-languageserver-textdocument-1.0.12.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-cxWNPesCnQCcMPeenjKKsOCKQZ/L6Tv19DTRIGuLWe32lyzWhihGVJ/rcckZXJxfdKCFvRLS3fpBIsV/ZGX4zA==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/vscode-languageserver-types": {
+      "version": "3.17.5",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vscode-languageserver-types/-/vscode-languageserver-types-3.17.5.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Ld1VelNuX9pdF39h2Hgaeb5hEZM2Z3jUrrMgWQAu82jMtZp7p3vJT3BzToKtZI7NgQssZje5o0zryOrhQvzQAg==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/vscode-uri": {
+      "version": "3.0.8",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vscode-uri/-/vscode-uri-3.0.8.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-AyFQ0EVmsOZOlAnxoFOGOq1SQDWAB7C6aqMGS23svWAllfOaxbuFvcT8D1i8z3Gyn8fraVeZNNmN6e9bxxXkKw==",
+      "dev": true,
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/wait-on": {
       "version": "9.0.5",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/wait-on/-/wait-on-9.0.5.tgz",
diff --git a/package.json b/package.json
index 8437466158..7fd849dffa 100644
--- a/package.json
+++ b/package.json
@@ -48,7 +48,9 @@
   },
   "scripts": {
     "dev": "vite",
-    "prebuild": "npx tsx scripts/aggregate-analysis.ts --all --quiet && npx tsx scripts/render-articles.ts --all --lang en,sv --quiet && npx tsx scripts/generate-news-indexes/index.ts && npx tsx scripts/extract-news-metadata.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-sitemap-html.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-political-intelligence.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-rss.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-sitemap.ts",
+    "predev": "npx tsx scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts --quiet",
+    "copy-vendor": "npx tsx scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts",
+    "prebuild": "npx tsx scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts --quiet && npx tsx scripts/aggregate-analysis.ts --all --quiet && npx tsx scripts/render-articles.ts --all --lang en,sv --quiet && npx tsx scripts/generate-news-indexes/index.ts && npx tsx scripts/extract-news-metadata.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-sitemap-html.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-political-intelligence.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-rss.ts && npx tsx scripts/generate-sitemap.ts",
     "build": "vite build",
     "build:lib": "tsc -p tsconfig.lib.json && tsc -p tsconfig.npm-scripts.json",
     "postbuild": "cp rss.xml dist/rss.xml && cp sitemap.xml dist/sitemap.xml && cp -r cia-data dist/cia-data",
@@ -69,7 +71,8 @@
     "generate-types": "npx tsx scripts/generate-types-from-cia-schemas.ts",
     "validate-translations": "npx tsx scripts/validate-translations.ts",
     "validate-news": "node scripts/validate-news-translations.ts",
-    "validate-all": "npm run htmlhint && npm run validate-translations && npm run validate-news",
+    "validate-article": "npx tsx scripts/validate-article.ts",
+    "validate-all": "npm run htmlhint && npm run validate-translations && npm run validate-news && npm run validate-article",
     "generate-news": "npx tsx scripts/render-articles.ts --all --lang en,sv",
     "aggregate-analysis": "npx tsx scripts/aggregate-analysis.ts --all",
     "render-articles": "npx tsx scripts/render-articles.ts --all --lang en,sv",
@@ -180,6 +183,7 @@
     "json-schema-to-typescript": "15.0.4",
     "jszip": "3.10.1",
     "knip": "6.6.3",
+    "mermaid": "11.4.1",
     "papaparse": "5.5.3",
     "playwright": "1.59.1",
     "rehype-autolink-headings": "^7.1.0",
diff --git a/scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts b/scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0ad9878c82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/**
+ * @module copy-vendor-mermaid
+ * @description Copies the Mermaid distribution from `node_modules/mermaid/dist/`
+ *              into `js/lib/mermaid/` so the site can serve Mermaid from its own
+ *              S3/CloudFront origin instead of an external CDN
+ *              (`cdn.jsdelivr.net`).
+ *
+ *              This script is invoked as part of `prebuild` in `package.json`.
+ *              The `js/` directory is merged into `dist/js/` by
+ *              `.github/workflows/deploy-s3.yml`, and `scripts/deploy-s3.sh`
+ *              uploads `.mjs` files with `Content-Type: application/javascript`
+ *              and `Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable`.
+ *
+ *              Generated files under `js/lib/mermaid/` are gitignored — they
+ *              are reproducible from the pinned `mermaid` devDependency in
+ *              `package.json` (Open_Source_Policy.md §3 / supply-chain rule:
+ *              vendored copies must trace back to a pinned npm SBOM entry).
+ *
+ *              ISMS rationale: removing the runtime dependency on
+ *              `cdn.jsdelivr.net` shrinks the trust boundary documented in
+ *              `THREAT_MODEL.md` (no third-party script-src), simplifies the
+ *              CSP (no `cdn.jsdelivr.net` allowlist entry needed for JS),
+ *              and aligns with the `Cryptography_Policy.md` SRI requirement
+ *              by allowing `vite-plugin-sri-gen` to hash every Mermaid asset.
+ *
+ * @example
+ *   npx tsx scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts
+ *
+ * @see js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs
+ * @see .github/workflows/deploy-s3.yml
+ * @see scripts/deploy-s3.sh
+ * @author Hack23 AB
+ * @license Apache-2.0
+ */
+
+import { existsSync, mkdirSync, readdirSync, statSync, copyFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { dirname, join, relative, resolve } from 'node:path';
+import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
+
+const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
+const __dirname = dirname(__filename);
+const REPO_ROOT = resolve(__dirname, '..');
+const SOURCE = resolve(REPO_ROOT, 'node_modules', 'mermaid', 'dist');
+const TARGET = resolve(REPO_ROOT, 'js', 'lib', 'mermaid');
+
+const QUIET = process.argv.includes('--quiet');
+function log(msg: string): void {
+  if (!QUIET) console.log(msg);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Recursively copy `.mjs` runtime files from a directory tree, preserving
+ * structure but excluding sourcemaps, type declarations, test mocks, and any
+ * non-runtime artefacts.
+ *
+ * Uses synchronous APIs because the script runs at the start of `prebuild`
+ * and must complete before Vite begins processing assets.
+ */
+function copyTree(src: string, dst: string): number {
+  if (!existsSync(dst)) mkdirSync(dst, { recursive: true });
+  let count = 0;
+  for (const entry of readdirSync(src)) {
+    // Skip non-runtime artefacts: source maps, type declarations, test mocks.
+    if (entry.endsWith('.map')) continue;
+    if (entry.endsWith('.d.ts')) continue;
+    if (entry === '__mocks__') continue;
+    if (entry.endsWith('.spec.d.ts')) continue;
+    const s = join(src, entry);
+    const d = join(dst, entry);
+    const st = statSync(s);
+    if (st.isDirectory()) {
+      count += copyTree(s, d);
+    } else if (st.isFile()) {
+      // Only copy ESM runtime files actually loaded by the browser.
+      if (!entry.endsWith('.mjs')) continue;
+      copyFileSync(s, d);
+      count += 1;
+    }
+  }
+  return count;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Copy only the production ESM bundle (`mermaid.esm.min.mjs` + its chunks)
+ * — the unminified ESM bundle, CommonJS bundle, and `mermaid.core` variant
+ * are all unused by the article renderer's loader and would unnecessarily
+ * inflate the S3 footprint.
+ */
+function copyMermaidRuntime(): number {
+  let count = 0;
+  // 1. Top-level entry point.
+  if (!existsSync(TARGET)) mkdirSync(TARGET, { recursive: true });
+  copyFileSync(join(SOURCE, 'mermaid.esm.min.mjs'), join(TARGET, 'mermaid.esm.min.mjs'));
+  count += 1;
+  // 2. Chunks the entry dynamically imports.
+  const chunksSrc = join(SOURCE, 'chunks', 'mermaid.esm.min');
+  const chunksDst = join(TARGET, 'chunks', 'mermaid.esm.min');
+  if (existsSync(chunksSrc)) {
+    count += copyTree(chunksSrc, chunksDst);
+  } else {
+    console.error(
+      `❌ copy-vendor-mermaid: missing chunks directory ${relative(REPO_ROOT, chunksSrc)}.`,
+    );
+    process.exit(1);
+  }
+  return count;
+}
+
+function main(): void {
+  if (!existsSync(SOURCE)) {
+    console.error(
+      `❌ copy-vendor-mermaid: source not found: ${relative(REPO_ROOT, SOURCE)}\n` +
+        `   Run \`npm ci\` so the pinned mermaid devDependency is installed.`,
+    );
+    process.exit(1);
+  }
+  const required = join(SOURCE, 'mermaid.esm.min.mjs');
+  if (!existsSync(required)) {
+    console.error(
+      `❌ copy-vendor-mermaid: missing required entry point ${relative(REPO_ROOT, required)}.\n` +
+        `   This usually means the installed mermaid version no longer ships an ESM build.\n` +
+        `   Re-pin mermaid in package.json or update this copy script.`,
+    );
+    process.exit(1);
+  }
+  const copied = copyMermaidRuntime();
+  log(`📦 copy-vendor-mermaid: copied ${copied} files → ${relative(REPO_ROOT, TARGET)}/`);
+}
+
+main();
diff --git a/scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts b/scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts
index 8cbf2f02c7..0e18e45b8b 100644
--- a/scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts
+++ b/scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts
@@ -211,7 +211,17 @@ const READER_GUIDE_ENTRIES: readonly {
  * canonical artifact section title.
  */
 function anchorForTitle(title: string): string {
-  return `${HEADING_ID_PREFIX}${new GithubSlugger().slug(title)}`;
+  // Mirror the pre-clean performed by markdown.ts#rehypeSlugWithPrefix:
+  // strip leading non-letter/non-number characters before slugging so
+  // an emoji-prefixed section title (e.g. `🎯 BLUF`) doesn't produce a
+  // leading-dash slug that would render as `rm--bluf` once the prefix
+  // is applied. The Reader Intelligence Guide must produce the
+  // identical slug as the rendered heading ID so its #anchor links
+  // resolve. Note: `anchorForTitle` is only called for distinct
+  // top-level section titles (no dedup state needed here).
+  const cleaned = title.replace(/^[^\p{L}\p{N}]+/u, '').trim() || title;
+  const slug = new GithubSlugger().slug(cleaned);
+  return `${HEADING_ID_PREFIX}${slug}`;
 }
 
 function buildReaderGuide(available: ReadonlySet<string>, hasDocuments: boolean): string {
@@ -371,6 +381,28 @@ function stripLeadingAdminBylines(body: string): string {
  * `Document control`, `Generated by …`), AI self-audit `## Pass 2 …`
  * sections (which carry process metadata, not article content), and
  * leading admin-byline paragraphs (`**Author**: … · **Run ID**: …`).
+ *
+ * Also performs three reader-facing HTML-quality projections, applied
+ * after the structural strips so they never remove signal:
+ *
+ * 1. **Heading demotion** — every artifact body is wrapped under an
+ *    aggregator-injected `## <Section title>`, so the *inner* `##`,
+ *    `###`, … headings are demoted by one level (`##` → `###`,
+ *    `###` → `####`, …, capped at `######`). Without this the rendered
+ *    article ends up with ~170 H2s and a flat outline that violates
+ *    WCAG 2.4.6 ("Headings and Labels") and the SEO heading-hierarchy
+ *    contract documented in `Article-Generation.md`.
+ * 2. **`_Source: file.md_` preamble removal** — the legacy aggregator
+ *    used to inject this italic line under every section heading, but
+ *    it now lives in the Reader Intelligence Guide and the
+ *    `## Article Sources` appendix; on top of an artifact body it reads
+ *    like a folder listing, not journalism. Some artifact templates
+ *    still author one (`_Source: foo.md_`) on their own — strip those
+ *    too.
+ * 3. **Empty-paragraph collapse** — admin-byline removal can leave 3+
+ *    consecutive blank lines and rendered HTML emits a stray `<p></p>`
+ *    for each pair. We already collapse 3+ blank lines to 2; this also
+ *    drops paragraphs that are empty after `_Source:_` italics removal.
  */
 function cleanArtifactBody(raw: string): string {
   const parsed = matter(raw);
@@ -389,11 +421,64 @@ function cleanArtifactBody(raw: string): string {
   body = stripPassTwoSection(body);
   // Strip leading admin-byline paragraphs (template preamble).
   body = stripLeadingAdminBylines(body.trimStart());
-  // Collapse 3+ blank lines to 2
+  // Strip in-body `_Source: file.md_` italic preambles (legacy template
+  // preamble — sources are now surfaced in the Reader Intelligence
+  // Guide and the `## Article Sources` appendix instead).
+  body = stripSourcePreamble(body);
+  // Demote inner headings by one level — the aggregator wraps each body
+  // in its own `## <Section title>` so the artifact's own `##` becomes a
+  // sibling, not a child. Cap at H6.
+  body = demoteHeadings(body);
+  // Collapse 3+ blank lines to 2 (post-strip cleanup).
   body = body.replace(/\n{3,}/g, '\n\n');
   return body.trim();
 }
 
+/**
+ * Remove `_Source: \`file.md\`_` (and `_Source: [\`file.md\`](url)_`)
+ * italic preamble lines. Only strips lines that **start** with the
+ * source marker — never inline mentions. Bracket-link variant is
+ * matched explicitly to allow for the markdown link payload.
+ */
+function stripSourcePreamble(body: string): string {
+  return body
+    .replace(/^_\s*Source:\s*\[?`[^\n]*?\n+/gim, '')
+    .replace(/^_\s*Source:\s*[^\n]*_\s*$\n?/gim, '');
+}
+
+/**
+ * Demote ATX headings by one level inside an artifact body — `##` → `###`,
+ * `###` → `####`, …, capped at `######`. The aggregator wraps each
+ * artifact under its own injected `## <title>`, so without this the
+ * rendered article outline ends up flat (every artifact's internal H2s
+ * become siblings of the wrapper H2). Indentation, fenced code blocks
+ * and table contents are not affected — only line-anchored ATX headings
+ * are matched.
+ *
+ * Headings inside fenced code blocks are explicitly excluded by
+ * tracking fence state line-by-line.
+ */
+function demoteHeadings(body: string): string {
+  const lines = body.split('\n');
+  let inFence = false;
+  for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i += 1) {
+    const line = lines[i]!;
+    // Track entry/exit of triple-backtick or triple-tilde fenced code.
+    if (/^\s{0,3}(?:```|~~~)/.test(line)) {
+      inFence = !inFence;
+      continue;
+    }
+    if (inFence) continue;
+    const m = line.match(/^(#{1,6})(\s+\S)/);
+    if (!m) continue;
+    const current = m[1]!.length;
+    if (current >= 6) continue;          // already at H6, can't demote further
+    if (current === 1) continue;         // H1 already stripped by upstream regex; defensive
+    lines[i] = '#'.repeat(current + 1) + line.slice(current);
+  }
+  return lines.join('\n');
+}
+
 /**
  * Rewrite relative `[label](path.md)` links in the aggregated markdown to
  * absolute GitHub blob URLs — the rendered HTML lives at a different path
@@ -666,10 +751,16 @@ export function aggregateAnalysis(input: AggregationInput): AggregationResult {
     const clean = rewriteRelativeLinks(cleanArtifactBody(raw), subfolderRepoRelPath);
     if (!clean) return;
     const title = titleForArtifact(fileName);
+    // Source attribution previously rendered as an italic preamble
+    // under every section (`_Source: file.md_`), which read like a
+    // folder listing. It now appears once in the Reader Intelligence
+    // Guide and once in the `## Article Sources` appendix; the per-
+    // section heading is annotated with an HTML comment for auditors
+    // that does not surface in rendered HTML.
     const sourceUrl = buildGithubBlobUrl(`${subfolderRepoRelPath}/${fileName}`);
     sections.push(
-      `## ${title}\n\n` +
-      `_Source: [\`${fileName}\`](${sourceUrl})_\n\n` +
+      `## ${title}\n` +
+      `<!-- source: ${fileName} :: ${sourceUrl} -->\n\n` +
       clean,
     );
     used.push(fileName);
@@ -741,8 +832,8 @@ export function aggregateAnalysis(input: AggregationInput): AggregationResult {
               `${subfolderRepoRelPath}/documents/${df}`,
             );
             perDocSections.push(
-              `### ${escapeInlineMd(dokId)}\n\n` +
-              `_Source: [\`documents/${df}\`](${sourceUrl})_\n\n` +
+              `### ${escapeInlineMd(dokId)}\n` +
+              `<!-- source: documents/${df} :: ${sourceUrl} -->\n\n` +
               clean,
             );
             used.push(`documents/${df}`);
@@ -775,7 +866,27 @@ export function aggregateAnalysis(input: AggregationInput): AggregationResult {
     readSection(f, true);
   }
 
-  // 4. Compose final markdown with YAML front-matter.
+  // 4. Article Sources appendix — single canonical list at the end of
+  //    the article. Replaces the per-section `_Source: …_` italics that
+  //    used to read like a folder listing under every heading. Each
+  //    entry links to the artifact on GitHub for full audit traceability.
+  if (used.length > 0) {
+    const sourceLines = used.map((file) => {
+      const url = buildGithubBlobUrl(`${subfolderRepoRelPath}/${file}`);
+      return `- [\`${file}\`](${url})`;
+    });
+    sections.push(
+      [
+        '## Article Sources',
+        '',
+        'Each section above projects one analysis artifact. The full audited markdown is available on GitHub:',
+        '',
+        ...sourceLines,
+      ].join('\n'),
+    );
+  }
+
+  // 5. Compose final markdown with YAML front-matter.
   const now = new Date();
   const slug = `${date}-${subfolder}`;
   const frontMatter = [
@@ -822,6 +933,8 @@ export const __test__ = {
   SENTENCE_END_RE,
   stripPassTwoSection,
   stripLeadingAdminBylines,
+  stripSourcePreamble,
+  demoteHeadings,
   cleanArtifactBody,
   rewriteRelativeLinks,
   prettifyFallbackTitle,
@@ -834,4 +947,5 @@ export const __test__ = {
   titleFromBluf,
   escapeYaml,
   escapeInlineMd,
+  anchorForTitle,
 };
diff --git a/scripts/render-lib/markdown.ts b/scripts/render-lib/markdown.ts
index f7db435a92..0de437cfb4 100644
--- a/scripts/render-lib/markdown.ts
+++ b/scripts/render-lib/markdown.ts
@@ -135,7 +135,21 @@ function rehypeSlugWithPrefix() {
         return;
       }
       const text = hastToString(node);
-      node.properties.id = `${HEADING_ID_PREFIX}${slugger.slug(text)}`;
+      // Pre-strip leading non-letter/non-number characters BEFORE slug
+      // generation, so the slugger never sees an `🎯 BLUF` heading and
+      // emits a leading-hyphen slug that we'd then trim away (which
+      // would silently desynchronise its duplicate-suffix state and
+      // produce two `rm-sources` IDs from `### 📜 Sources` and a
+      // later `### Sources`). Cleaning before slug-time keeps the
+      // slugger's state consistent so duplicates get `-1`, `-2` …
+      // suffixes correctly. If cleaning would produce an empty
+      // string (heading is pure emoji / punctuation), fall back to
+      // the original text so we still emit *some* slug — the
+      // article-validator's `empty-heading-slug` rule blocks those
+      // upstream.
+      const cleanedText = text.replace(/^[^\p{L}\p{N}]+/u, '').trim() || text;
+      const slug = slugger.slug(cleanedText);
+      node.properties.id = `${HEADING_ID_PREFIX}${slug}`;
     });
   };
 }
diff --git a/scripts/validate-article.ts b/scripts/validate-article.ts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f1185ecb9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/validate-article.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
+/**
+ * @module scripts/validate-article
+ * @description Hard, scripted minimum-content validator for aggregated
+ *              `analysis/daily/$DATE/$SUBFOLDER/article.md` files.
+ *
+ *              Implements the script-enforcement layer described in the
+ *              Phase 1 article-quality plan in `Article-Generation.md`:
+ *              every quality minimum (placeholder strings, BLUF presence,
+ *              Reader Intelligence Guide, heading-anchor health,
+ *              per-document `dok_id` citation density) is a real TS
+ *              check that fails CI — never advisory bash.
+ *
+ *              The validator is **content-only** — it does not re-render
+ *              HTML. The renderer's structural projections (heading
+ *              demotion, source-preamble stripping, slug normalisation)
+ *              are unit-tested in `tests/render-lib.test.ts`; this script
+ *              guards the *AI-authored* contribution: the artifact
+ *              contents that the aggregator concatenates.
+ *
+ * @example
+ *   # Validate every aggregated article in the repo:
+ *   npx tsx scripts/validate-article.ts
+ *
+ *   # Validate a single article:
+ *   npx tsx scripts/validate-article.ts analysis/daily/2026-04-24/interpellations/article.md
+ *
+ *   # Used in CI:
+ *   - npm run validate-article
+ *
+ * @see scripts/render-lib/aggregator.ts — produces the article.md files
+ * @see Article-Generation.md — Phase 1 article-quality contract
+ * @see analysis/templates/README.md — template-side authoring contract
+ * @author Hack23 AB
+ * @license Apache-2.0
+ */
+
+import { readFile, readdir, stat } from 'node:fs/promises';
+import { existsSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { join, relative, resolve } from 'node:path';
+import process from 'node:process';
+
+const REPO_ROOT = resolve(process.cwd());
+
+/**
+ * A single rule failure on a single article. `code` is a stable
+ * machine-readable identifier suitable for grep, dashboards, and
+ * suppression workflows.
+ */
+interface ArticleViolation {
+  readonly file: string;
+  readonly code: string;
+  readonly message: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Placeholder strings that templates contain on disk and that the AI
+ * agent is instructed to replace during Pass-1 / Pass-2. Any of these
+ * surviving in the aggregated article means the agent skipped the
+ * substitution and the article is not publishable.
+ *
+ * Keep this list in sync with the markers used in
+ * `analysis/templates/*.md`.
+ */
+const PLACEHOLDER_PATTERNS: readonly RegExp[] = [
+  /\[REQUIRED:[^\]]*\]/,
+  /AI[_-]MUST[_-]REPLACE/i,
+  /\bTBD\b\s*:/,
+  /<insert\b[^>]*>/i,
+  /\bFILL[_\s]IN\b/i,
+];
+
+/**
+ * Reader-Facing Output Contract — every aggregated article must contain
+ * these reader-facing landmarks. The aggregator generates the Reader
+ * Intelligence Guide and the Article Sources appendix automatically;
+ * the BLUF and Executive Brief sections come from the
+ * `executive-brief.md` artifact and are guarded here so a malformed
+ * template can't ship a headless article.
+ */
+const REQUIRED_LANDMARKS: ReadonlyArray<{ pattern: RegExp; label: string; code: string }> = [
+  {
+    pattern: /^##\s+Reader Intelligence Guide\s*$/m,
+    label: 'Reader Intelligence Guide',
+    code: 'missing-reader-guide',
+  },
+  {
+    pattern: /^##\s+Executive Brief\s*$/m,
+    label: '## Executive Brief section',
+    code: 'missing-executive-brief',
+  },
+  {
+    pattern: /^#{2,6}\s+(?:[^\n]*?\s)?BLUF\b/im,
+    label: 'BLUF heading inside the executive brief',
+    code: 'missing-bluf',
+  },
+  {
+    pattern: /^##\s+Article Sources\s*$/m,
+    label: 'Article Sources appendix',
+    code: 'missing-sources-appendix',
+  },
+];
+
+const MIN_BLUF_PROSE_CHARS = 80;
+const MAX_BLUF_PROSE_CHARS = 1200; // generous — long BLUFs are fine; we just guard against empty/stub or runaway dumps
+const MIN_PER_DOC_DOK_ID_HITS = 1;
+
+async function walk(dir: string, name: string): Promise<string[]> {
+  if (!existsSync(dir)) return [];
+  const out: string[] = [];
+  for (const entry of await readdir(dir)) {
+    const full = join(dir, entry);
+    const st = await stat(full);
+    if (st.isDirectory()) {
+      out.push(...(await walk(full, name)));
+    } else if (entry === name) {
+      out.push(full);
+    }
+  }
+  return out;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Extract the prose paragraph that immediately follows a `## … BLUF …`
+ * heading. Mirrors the renderer's BLUF-extraction logic in spirit —
+ * we don't re-import the aggregator here because the validator must
+ * stay decoupled from the render pipeline so CI can run it
+ * independently of any aggregation step.
+ */
+function extractBluf(article: string): string | null {
+  const m = article.match(/^#{2,6}\s+(?:[^\n]*?\s)?BLUF\b[^\n]*\n+([\s\S]*?)(?=\n#{1,6}\s|\n*$)/im);
+  if (!m) return null;
+  const paragraph = m[1]!.split(/\n\n+/).map((p) => p.trim()).find((p) => p.length > 0 && !/^[#|>*<]/.test(p));
+  return paragraph ?? null;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Find every per-document subsection (`### HD12345` produced by the
+ * aggregator beneath the `## Per-document intelligence` header) and
+ * return each one's body. The body must contain at least one
+ * `dok_id` reference so the article remains traceable to a primary
+ * source — orphan per-document sections are blocked.
+ */
+function extractPerDocumentSections(article: string): Array<{ id: string; body: string }> {
+  const start = article.match(/^##\s+Per-document intelligence\s*$/m);
+  if (!start || start.index === undefined) return [];
+  const tail = article.slice(start.index + start[0].length);
+  // Stop at the next `## ` heading (next top-level section in the article).
+  const stop = tail.search(/^##\s+\S/m);
+  const region = stop === -1 ? tail : tail.slice(0, stop);
+  const sections: Array<{ id: string; body: string }> = [];
+
+  // The aggregator emits one `### <dok_id>` per per-document analysis,
+  // where `<dok_id>` is a riksdagen identifier such as `HD12345` or
+  // `FiU17`. After in-body heading demotion (`### Document summary`,
+  // `### Classification`, …) every other `### …` heading inside the
+  // section body is *content*, not a new per-document boundary.
+  // We therefore split only on H3 headings whose text matches a
+  // dok_id-shaped token — everything between two such headings (or
+  // from the last one to end-of-region) is one section's body.
+  const DOK_ID_HEADING = /^###\s+(H[A-Z0-9]{6,10}|[A-ZÅÄÖ]{1,4}\d{4,8})\s*$/m;
+  let cursor = region;
+  // First pass — anchor to the first dok_id heading.
+  let m = cursor.match(DOK_ID_HEADING);
+  while (m && m.index !== undefined) {
+    const id = m[1]!;
+    const after = cursor.slice(m.index + m[0].length);
+    const next = after.match(DOK_ID_HEADING);
+    const body = next && next.index !== undefined ? after.slice(0, next.index) : after;
+    sections.push({ id, body });
+    if (!next || next.index === undefined) break;
+    cursor = after.slice(next.index);
+    m = cursor.match(DOK_ID_HEADING);
+  }
+  return sections;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Slug a heading the way the renderer (and the aggregator's Reader
+ * Intelligence Guide) does: lowercase, replace non-word with `-`,
+ * strip leading/trailing dashes. We don't pull github-slugger into
+ * the validator because we only need to catch the double-dash case;
+ * the renderer is the source of truth for production slugs.
+ */
+function permissiveSlug(heading: string): string {
+  return heading
+    .toLowerCase()
+    .replace(/[^\p{L}\p{N}]+/gu, '-')
+    .replace(/^-+|-+$/g, '');
+}
+
+/**
+ * Validate a single aggregated `article.md`. Returns the list of
+ * violations (empty array means the article passes).
+ */
+async function validateArticle(absPath: string): Promise<ArticleViolation[]> {
+  const rel = relative(REPO_ROOT, absPath);
+  const text = await readFile(absPath, 'utf8');
+  const violations: ArticleViolation[] = [];
+
+  // 1. Placeholder strings must not survive Pass-2.
+  for (const pat of PLACEHOLDER_PATTERNS) {
+    const m = text.match(pat);
+    if (m) {
+      violations.push({
+        file: rel,
+        code: 'unresolved-placeholder',
+        message: `Template placeholder ${JSON.stringify(m[0])} was not replaced during AI-FIRST Pass-2 — see analysis/templates/README.md "Reader-Facing Output Contract".`,
+      });
+    }
+  }
+
+  // 2. Required reader-facing landmarks.
+  for (const landmark of REQUIRED_LANDMARKS) {
+    if (!landmark.pattern.test(text)) {
+      violations.push({
+        file: rel,
+        code: landmark.code,
+        message: `Aggregated article is missing the required "${landmark.label}". The aggregator generates Reader Intelligence Guide and Article Sources automatically; missing Executive Brief / BLUF means the source artifact is malformed.`,
+      });
+    }
+  }
+
+  // 3. BLUF must be a real prose paragraph, not a stub.
+  const bluf = extractBluf(text);
+  if (bluf !== null) {
+    if (bluf.length < MIN_BLUF_PROSE_CHARS) {
+      violations.push({
+        file: rel,
+        code: 'bluf-too-short',
+        message: `BLUF prose is only ${bluf.length} chars — minimum is ${MIN_BLUF_PROSE_CHARS}. A publishable BLUF needs actor + active verb + object + when + so-what.`,
+      });
+    }
+    if (bluf.length > MAX_BLUF_PROSE_CHARS) {
+      violations.push({
+        file: rel,
+        code: 'bluf-too-long',
+        message: `BLUF prose is ${bluf.length} chars — maximum is ${MAX_BLUF_PROSE_CHARS}. Move the long-form analysis to the Synthesis Summary or Intelligence Assessment section.`,
+      });
+    }
+  }
+
+  // 4. Heading-anchor health: no `--` doubles after `rm-` prefix is applied.
+  //    We test the equivalent at the markdown level: no heading whose
+  //    permissive slug is empty or starts with `-`.
+  const headingLines = text.match(/^#{2,6}\s+\S[^\n]*$/gm) ?? [];
+  for (const h of headingLines) {
+    const text = h.replace(/^#+\s+/, '').trim();
+    const slug = permissiveSlug(text);
+    if (!slug) {
+      violations.push({
+        file: rel,
+        code: 'empty-heading-slug',
+        message: `Heading ${JSON.stringify(text)} produces an empty slug — pick a heading that contains at least one word/digit so the rendered #anchor is non-empty.`,
+      });
+    }
+  }
+
+  // 5. Per-document sections must cite at least one dok_id-style code.
+  const docSections = extractPerDocumentSections(text);
+  const dokIdRe = /\b(?:H[A-Z0-9]{6,10}|[A-ZÅÄÖ]{1,4}\d{4,8})\b/;
+  for (const section of docSections) {
+    const hits = section.body.match(new RegExp(dokIdRe.source, 'g')) ?? [];
+    if (hits.length < MIN_PER_DOC_DOK_ID_HITS) {
+      violations.push({
+        file: rel,
+        code: 'per-doc-missing-dok_id',
+        message: `Per-document section "${section.id}" cites zero dok_id-style codes — minimum is ${MIN_PER_DOC_DOK_ID_HITS}. Every per-document subsection must trace back to at least one primary-source identifier (e.g. HD12345, FiU17).`,
+      });
+    }
+  }
+
+  return violations;
+}
+
+async function main(): Promise<void> {
+  const argPaths = process.argv.slice(2).filter((a) => !a.startsWith('--'));
+  let files: string[];
+  if (argPaths.length > 0) {
+    files = argPaths.map((p) => resolve(REPO_ROOT, p));
+  } else {
+    files = await walk(join(REPO_ROOT, 'analysis', 'daily'), 'article.md');
+  }
+
+  if (files.length === 0) {
+    console.log('ℹ️  validate-article: no aggregated article.md files found — nothing to check.');
+    return;
+  }
+
+  let total = 0;
+  const buckets = new Map<string, number>();
+  for (const f of files) {
+    const violations = await validateArticle(f);
+    if (violations.length === 0) continue;
+    total += violations.length;
+    for (const v of violations) {
+      buckets.set(v.code, (buckets.get(v.code) ?? 0) + 1);
+      console.error(`❌ ${v.file}\n   [${v.code}] ${v.message}`);
+    }
+  }
+
+  console.log('');
+  console.log(`📊 validate-article: scanned ${files.length} article(s).`);
+  if (total === 0) {
+    console.log('✅ All aggregated articles pass the minimum-content contract.');
+    return;
+  }
+  console.log(`❌ ${total} violation(s) across ${buckets.size} rule(s):`);
+  for (const [code, count] of [...buckets.entries()].sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1])) {
+    console.log(`   • ${code}: ${count}`);
+  }
+  console.error('');
+  console.error('Article-quality minimums are documented in Article-Generation.md');
+  console.error('and analysis/templates/README.md (Reader-Facing Output Contract).');
+  process.exit(1);
+}
+
+main().catch((err: unknown) => {
+  console.error('💥 validate-article: unhandled error');
+  console.error(err);
+  process.exit(2);
+});
diff --git a/tests/no-external-cdn.test.ts b/tests/no-external-cdn.test.ts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..23ee36b78a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/no-external-cdn.test.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/**
+ * @file no-external-cdn.test.ts
+ * @description CI guard ensuring no runtime JavaScript or rendered HTML
+ *              article loads code from an external CDN. Riksdagsmonitor
+ *              serves all JavaScript from its own S3/CloudFront origin
+ *              (`riksdagsmonitor.com`) — third-party script-src is forbidden
+ *              by `SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md` and `THREAT_MODEL.md` and
+ *              prevents the platform from inheriting CDN compromise risk
+ *              (CIS Controls v8.1 §16.11, ISO 27001:2022 A.8.28).
+ *
+ *              The guard scans:
+ *                - `js/` runtime JavaScript (`.js`, `.mjs`, `.cjs`)
+ *                - `news/` rendered HTML articles
+ *
+ *              Auto-generated and vendored assets are explicitly excluded
+ *              (the `js/lib/mermaid/` tree is copied verbatim from the
+ *              pinned `mermaid` devDependency and is allowed to contain
+ *              comments referencing upstream URLs).
+ *
+ * @see js/lib/mermaid-init.mjs
+ * @see scripts/copy-vendor-mermaid.ts
+ * @see SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
+ */
+
+import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
+import { readFile, readdir, stat } from 'node:fs/promises';
+import { existsSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { join, resolve, sep } from 'node:path';
+
+const REPO_ROOT = resolve(process.cwd());
+
+/**
+ * Hosts that, if found in a runtime JavaScript or rendered HTML asset
+ * served from `riksdagsmonitor.com`, indicate a regression to an external
+ * CDN dependency. Each pattern is a literal lowercase substring that must
+ * not appear in any value of an HTML attribute (`src`, `href`, `import`)
+ * or in any `import`/`fetch` call inside JS.
+ */
+const FORBIDDEN_HOSTS = [
+  'cdn.jsdelivr.net',
+  'cdnjs.cloudflare.com',
+  'unpkg.com',
+  'esm.sh',
+  'cdn.skypack.dev',
+  'ajax.googleapis.com',
+] as const;
+
+/**
+ * File or directory paths (relative to the repository root) that the guard
+ * intentionally skips. These contain either upstream documentation,
+ * vendored third-party code (which legitimately references its origin in
+ * comments), or generated typedoc HTML that mirrors historical source.
+ */
+const EXCLUDED_PATHS = [
+  // Vendored Mermaid copy — contents come from npm; comments may reference
+  // the upstream package URL. Loader is checked separately below.
+  join('js', 'lib', 'mermaid') + sep,
+  // Generated TypeDoc API reference HTML — mirrors source comments, not a
+  // runtime asset served as part of articles.
+  join('docs', 'api') + sep,
+];
+
+async function walk(dir: string, exts: readonly string[]): Promise<string[]> {
+  if (!existsSync(dir)) return [];
+  const out: string[] = [];
+  for (const entry of await readdir(dir)) {
+    const full = join(dir, entry);
+    const st = await stat(full);
+    if (st.isDirectory()) {
+      out.push(...(await walk(full, exts)));
+    } else if (exts.some((e) => entry.endsWith(e))) {
+      out.push(full);
+    }
+  }
+  return out;
+}
+
+function isExcluded(path: string): boolean {
+  const rel = path.startsWith(REPO_ROOT) ? path.slice(REPO_ROOT.length + 1) : path;
+  return EXCLUDED_PATHS.some((p) => rel.startsWith(p));
+}
+
+async function findForbidden(files: string[]): Promise<Array<{ file: string; host: string; line: string }>> {
+  const hits: Array<{ file: string; host: string; line: string }> = [];
+  for (const f of files) {
+    if (isExcluded(f)) continue;
+    const text = await readFile(f, 'utf8');
+    const lower = text.toLowerCase();
+    for (const host of FORBIDDEN_HOSTS) {
+      if (!lower.includes(host)) continue;
+      // Find the offending line for a useful error message.
+      const lines = text.split(/\r?\n/);
+      const offending = lines.find((l) => l.toLowerCase().includes(host)) ?? '';
+      hits.push({ file: f.slice(REPO_ROOT.length + 1), host, line: offending.trim().slice(0, 200) });
+    }
+  }
+  return hits;
+}
+
+describe('no external CDN in runtime JavaScript', () => {
+  it('no js runtime file loads code from an external CDN host', async () => {
+    const files = await walk(join(REPO_ROOT, 'js'), ['.js', '.mjs', '.cjs']);
+    const hits = await findForbidden(files);
+    if (hits.length > 0) {
+      const summary = hits
+        .map((h) => `  - ${h.file} → ${h.host}\n      ${h.line}`)
+        .join('\n');
+      throw new Error(
+        `External CDN reference found in runtime JS — Riksdagsmonitor must serve all\n` +
+          `JavaScript from its own S3/CloudFront origin. Vendor the dependency under\n` +
+          `js/lib/<name>/ via a copy-vendor-* script and import it relatively.\n${summary}`,
+      );
+    }
+    expect(hits).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('mermaid-init.mjs imports Mermaid from the vendored same-origin path', async () => {
+    const loader = join(REPO_ROOT, 'js', 'lib', 'mermaid-init.mjs');
+    const text = await readFile(loader, 'utf8');
+    expect(text, 'mermaid loader should reference the local vendored path').toContain(
+      './mermaid/mermaid.esm.min.mjs',
+    );
+    expect(text, 'mermaid loader must not reference any external CDN host').not.toMatch(
+      /cdn\.jsdelivr|cdnjs\.cloudflare|unpkg\.com|esm\.sh|skypack/i,
+    );
+  });
+});
+
+describe('no external CDN in rendered news articles', () => {
+  it('no rendered news article references an external CDN host', async () => {
+    const files = await walk(join(REPO_ROOT, 'news'), ['.html']);
+    if (files.length === 0) {
+      // Articles haven't been rendered yet in this checkout — nothing to assert.
+      return;
+    }
+    const hits = await findForbidden(files);
+    if (hits.length > 0) {
+      const summary = hits
+        .map((h) => `  - ${h.file} → ${h.host}\n      ${h.line}`)
+        .join('\n');
+      throw new Error(
+        `External CDN reference found in a rendered article. The article renderer\n` +
+          `(scripts/render-lib/chrome.ts) must only emit script/href URLs that resolve\n` +
+          `against the same S3/CloudFront origin.\n${summary}`,
+      );
+    }
+    expect(hits).toEqual([]);
+  });
+});
diff --git a/tests/render-lib.test.ts b/tests/render-lib.test.ts
index 85bc3c7f14..38dca67f3d 100644
--- a/tests/render-lib.test.ts
+++ b/tests/render-lib.test.ts
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ import {
 const {
   stripPassTwoSection,
   stripLeadingAdminBylines,
+  stripSourcePreamble,
+  demoteHeadings,
   cleanArtifactBody,
   rewriteRelativeLinks,
   prettifyFallbackTitle,
@@ -39,6 +41,7 @@ const {
   readFirstParagraph,
   escapeYaml,
   escapeInlineMd,
+  anchorForTitle,
 } = __test__;
 
 describe('render-lib — cleanArtifactBody', () => {
@@ -191,6 +194,112 @@ describe('render-lib — AGGREGATION_ORDER', () => {
   });
 });
 
+describe('render-lib — reader-facing HTML quality projections', () => {
+  describe('demoteHeadings', () => {
+    it('demotes every ATX heading by one level so artifact bodies nest under wrapper H2', () => {
+      const input = [
+        '## 🎯 BLUF',
+        '',
+        'lede paragraph',
+        '',
+        '### 60-second read',
+        '',
+        '#### Detail',
+        '',
+        '##### Sub-detail',
+      ].join('\n');
+      expect(demoteHeadings(input)).toBe(
+        [
+          '### 🎯 BLUF',
+          '',
+          'lede paragraph',
+          '',
+          '#### 60-second read',
+          '',
+          '##### Detail',
+          '',
+          '###### Sub-detail',
+        ].join('\n'),
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('caps demotion at H6 — already-deep headings are left alone', () => {
+      const input = '###### Already at H6';
+      expect(demoteHeadings(input)).toBe('###### Already at H6');
+    });
+
+    it('does not touch ATX-looking lines inside fenced code blocks', () => {
+      const input = [
+        '## Real heading',
+        '',
+        '```bash',
+        '## not a heading inside fence',
+        '### also not',
+        '```',
+        '',
+        '### After fence — real heading',
+      ].join('\n');
+      const out = demoteHeadings(input);
+      expect(out).toContain('### Real heading');
+      // The line inside the fence is preserved verbatim.
+      expect(out).toContain('## not a heading inside fence');
+      expect(out).toContain('### also not');
+      expect(out).toContain('#### After fence — real heading');
+    });
+
+    it('leaves H1 alone (defensive — already stripped by upstream H1 regex)', () => {
+      // H1 demotion would conflict with the wrapper-H2 contract; the
+      // first H1 has been stripped by cleanArtifactBody upstream.
+      const input = '# Surviving H1\n\n## sub';
+      const out = demoteHeadings(input);
+      expect(out).toBe('# Surviving H1\n\n### sub');
+    });
+
+    it('ignores `#` characters that are not the start of an ATX heading', () => {
+      const input = 'an inline mention of #hashtag and `## not a heading`';
+      expect(demoteHeadings(input)).toBe(input);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('stripSourcePreamble', () => {
+    it('strips a `_Source: \\`file.md\\`_` italic preamble line at the top of an artifact body', () => {
+      const input = [
+        '_Source: [`executive-brief.md`](https://github.com/x/y/blob/main/executive-brief.md)_',
+        '',
+        '## 🎯 BLUF',
+        'real content',
+      ].join('\n');
+      const out = stripSourcePreamble(input);
+      expect(out).not.toContain('_Source:');
+      expect(out).toContain('## 🎯 BLUF');
+      expect(out).toContain('real content');
+    });
+
+    it('strips a bare `_Source: file.md_` italic preamble (no link)', () => {
+      const input = '_Source: synthesis-summary.md_\n\nbody';
+      expect(stripSourcePreamble(input)).toBe('body');
+    });
+
+    it('leaves inline `Source:` mentions inside prose untouched', () => {
+      const input = 'According to the report, "Source: Riksdagen" is the canonical citation.';
+      expect(stripSourcePreamble(input)).toBe(input);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('anchorForTitle', () => {
+    it('produces stable rm-prefixed slugs for ASCII titles', () => {
+      expect(anchorForTitle('Executive Brief')).toBe('rm-executive-brief');
+    });
+
+    it('trims leading hyphens that github-slugger emits when a title starts with a stripped character', () => {
+      // emoji 🎯 is stripped by github-slugger → leading hyphen
+      // would yield `rm--bluf` without normalisation.
+      expect(anchorForTitle('🎯 BLUF')).toBe('rm-bluf');
+      expect(anchorForTitle('🎯 60-second read')).toBe('rm-60-second-read');
+    });
+  });
+});
+
 describe('render-lib — aggregateAnalysis (integration)', () => {
   it('aggregates a minimal subfolder, strips Pass-2 and admin bylines, and picks a real description', () => {
     // Build a temp subfolder that mimics analysis/daily/$DATE/$SUB/.
@@ -528,6 +637,40 @@ describe('render-lib — renderMarkdownToHtml', () => {
     );
     expect(html).not.toContain('<iframe');
   });
+
+  it('produces unique heading IDs even when an emoji-prefixed heading shares a base slug with a plain heading (HTMLHint id-unique guard)', async () => {
+    // Reproduces the html-validation CI failure: `### 📜 Sources` and
+    // a later `### Sources` were both slugged to `rm-sources`. The
+    // pre-clean step in `rehypeSlugWithPrefix` must keep the slugger's
+    // duplicate-suffix state consistent so the second heading gets
+    // `rm-sources-1`.
+    const md = [
+      '## Section A',
+      '',
+      '### 📜 Sources',
+      '',
+      'first',
+      '',
+      '## Section B',
+      '',
+      '### Sources',
+      '',
+      'second',
+      '',
+    ].join('\n');
+    const html = await renderMarkdownToHtml(md);
+    expect(html).toContain('id="rm-sources"');
+    expect(html).toContain('id="rm-sources-1"');
+    // Negative: no double-dash slugs may leak through.
+    expect(html).not.toMatch(/id="rm--/);
+  });
+
+  it('produces unique heading IDs across an emoji-prefixed and non-prefixed heading with mixed casing (defensive)', async () => {
+    const md = '### 🔒 Confidence Profile\n\nfoo\n\n### Confidence Profile\n\nbar\n';
+    const html = await renderMarkdownToHtml(md);
+    expect(html).toContain('id="rm-confidence-profile"');
+    expect(html).toContain('id="rm-confidence-profile-1"');
+  });
 });
 
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------